azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

"There was a man walking down a street. There was also another man, who decided to kill him with no acceptable reason", that right there shows ignorant on the details on the events, laws, and reasonable actions. That's why many people found Zimmerman guilty. Pure ignorant.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

* Ignorance. If you're going to pick apart what I have said then I will be more than happy to return the favour. And by the way, saying that I think self defense, given the circumstances, was not a good enough reason to kill someone, is not ignorance. You may say I was ignoring the fact Zimmerman had bruises and scratches on his face, and that he was being sat on by him, yes I left that out. But it's still no excuse to shoot someone. He should have lied and pleaded insanity, then he would have had a half way decent excuse.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

No it doesn't. You can kill people in this nation and not be breaking the law. It's called "self defence" now what do you think the 2nd amendment is for other then for sport? You can kill people if you are being attacked by them the question is though "Is it exeptable is this case?" Well, there is way more then a reasonable doubt this wasn't a murder so he is not guilty. I would have done the same if I was being attacked. Only hopefully I would think fast enough to shoot him in a non fatal area. You have the right to defend your life and liberty.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Don't use the second amendment in your argument if you don't know what it is. It clearly states, " A well run militia..."  I'm not sure, but I don't think this includes neighborhood watch.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Well anyway you can defend yourself otherwise there would be no question wether Zimmerman was guilty. The 2nd amendment says you have the right to bare arms. Anyone who says "You can't take another life just to save your own!" Is A complete dumbass unless they mean that you murdered someone just to get one of their kidneys to save your life. It is perfectly legal to kill someone in self defence and there is no proof beyond reasonable doubt that George wasn't acting in self defence. What would you do if you had a gun and someone was on top of you beating you senceless and you are in fear of your life.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

How was Martin going to kill Zimmerman? Strangle him? We have evidence of this? Nope.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Zimmermans word which really isn't much, uh eye witnesses said Trayvon was on top. Alright say you where in that situation, you don't have much time to think and you aren't sure of anything. You have a gun and your panicing. What would you do? Don't be so critical.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

What proof have you that Zimmerman was beaten 'senseless' too? A few scratches and bruises??
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Yes and he was in fear that it would get wourse, Trayvon WAS attacking him and the prosicution doesn't have enough proof to say he murdered Trayvon. He killed Trayvon but, he didn't murder him.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

And you know for a fact he didn't murder him huh? Based on what? What if they said he was guilty, would you then think " Oh actually, yes there was enough evidence to find him guilty, how about that..."Besides, do we know who started the whole thing, maybe Travon was acting in self defense to start with and Zimmerman shot him. Do you have solid proof to say this isn't true?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

I thought he was innocent months before the trial, asshole. There isn't enough proof to condem him. Yes, Trayvon could have been action in self defense and Zimmerman could be out in bloodlust but, there is so little proof it would probebly put a innocent man behind bars. I personaly believe he is innocent but, even if I thought there was a very good chance he did it. It wouldn't be wourth putting him behind bars.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

There is no point in argueing with you any more. Your mind is set. Do note that I do find you very stupid that is all. Have a nice day.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

From what I saw of the trial, how he acted, all the evidence considered ( for and against) I would have found him guilty, as would many, many people, hence the controversy. If you're so sure he is innocent, why do so many people say otherwise? And you're right I am extremely stubborn, which is why I find entertainment in debating. Schoner-tag to you too.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

And you'll hate me more for this, but throughout the course of these arguments, let it also be noted your spelling, punctuation, and grammar have all been bad. Which is why i find you to be rather uneducated.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

You have a point there and I don't hate you, I just fing that you are acting very stupid for your opinion in this arguement. Very stupid.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

This man killed another human being. Not out of self defense, not for the greater good of mankind, not to protect others. He did it because he says he felt threatened. Anywhere else in the world, that is by no means an acceptable argument for killing someone. Except in this place:http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/write.ign.com/133742/2013/07/Meanwhile+in+Murica+_062f93860376eea9654d7c1a8db8eb13.jpg
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Yes he felt threatened of his life and he WAS beingg attacked. So he shot the guy, he didn't have much time to think pointed the gun up and shot him in the chest. This was just a case started by the media that made blacks angry and became something it wasn't.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Although the death of T. Martin is tragic, and nobody wants to see the death of a young man, but Zimmerman has the right to defend his life and liberty, and he should not be ashamed for using brute force to keep his right.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

but Zimmerman has the right to defend his life and libertySo to protect his "life and liberty" he stole another? Doesnt sound like he is in favor of preserving it if he was willing to deprive another man of it. He didnt have to kill him at all.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

First, you can't prove that, so because he might be guilty, we send him to jail? No, it's beter let a guilty man free then a inocent man to prison. Second, you don't know he wanted to kill Trayvon. He could of, but there's a strong reasonable doubt. Anyway, he has the right to defend himself. He was in the right. So you think he should have let himself get killed so he didn't kill another man? You have surprised and disapointed me.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

He killed him. Who takes the blame the gun? Trayvon? Trayvon didn't shoot himself and that gun most certainly didn't. He didn't have to kill him. He could have just shot him in a non fatal area. Instead he deliberately disobeyed police orders and took his gun with him.  Anyway, he has the right to defend himself. He was in the right. So you think he should have let himself get killed so he didn't kill another man? You have surprised and disapointed me.Really? This wouldn't have happened of he staued in the car like the police told him to do. Instead he follow Trayvon. That makes no sense. They told him to stay. He took his gun with him on purpose. It didn't follow him. Second he could have shot him anywhere else that would be nin fatal. Arm. Hands. Foot. Leg. Something. He had the right to defend himself and so did Trayvon since Zimmerman got out of his car and went after him. There is no excuse. If he stayed in the car this wouldn't have occured. You surprised me and disappointed me by completely missing the fact that if he just followed directions this wouldn't have happened.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

I take back what I said about being disapointed, you see he was the neighborhood watchman. He wanted to be a cop and he wanted to do the things cops do. He came armed, so what? He had a right to! Anyway, this guy could be dangerous. I agree, no he shouldn't of shot him in the heart but, you don't have much time to think when you are being attack he just shot him. Saddly, it killed Trayvon Martin. Trayvon probebly thought George was a sexual preditor so he did what I would do. Punch him in the face. The problem it, he continued the attack. George paniced. He thought he was going to die, he pulled out his gun pointed up and shot trayvon. It was a tragic mishap that should of never happened. The media used this into some sort of racial civil rights outrage and now George will have to live with this for the rest of his life.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Well you killed an African American male when the entire situation could have been avoided. You didnt bring up the fact that he chose to step out of the car. This would have happen if he just took the policemans words.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

He steped out of the car, but he did not break the law! This is almost a purely emotional baced case. A black guy was killed by a white guy. To me which race was which doesn't mater. That was stupid of Zimmerman, but not evil.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

He was actually already out of the car when the dispatcher said that he didn't "need" to follow Martin. Earlier on the tape, the same dispatcher was asking for more information and was asking Zimmerman "what's he doing now" and "let me know if he does anything else." Everyone just assumes that Zimmerman was in his car when he wasn't.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

So why didnt he get back in his car an avoid the situation? Why did he even pursue the boy?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

You would have to ask Zimmerman "why." All I know is that he was within his rights to follow his suspect and to report what he was seeing to the dispatcher even if the dispatcher said he didn't need for Zimmerman to do that.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Ummm he still killed a boy when all he had to do was remain in the car. There is no excuse for it. He should have stayed in his vehicle.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

If I were Zimmerman and a crime watcher I would likely have followed for as long as I felt I could safely do so myself. That's what neighborhood crime watchers do.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

It would be more logical to not pursue a kid who has the potential to attack you. Its illogical to pursue.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

If the person you are legally following becomes violent and attacks you? That's what the gun is for and that's what happened in this case.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Then dont follow him. That simple. Also if you are trained shoot him somewhere else. He didnt have to kill him thats the thing. Are you going to say he had to kill him? Thats just immoral if you do. There is no excuse.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Crime watches are set up for ordinary citizens to police their own neighborhoods by observing suspicious activity and reporting it to the cops. That's all Zimmerman was doing and as for the gun, most everyone I know who carries a gun will tell you the same thing I did earlier. If you have to use your gun to defend yourself you shoot to kill.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

That still doesnt pardon him when he was advised to remain where he was. Thats where he messed up. In the end he still killed a boy and the entire situation could have been avoided. There is no excuse for it.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

I would have done the same thing Zimmerman did to protect my neighborhood and if I was attacked under the same circumstances I would have done the very same thing. Maybe Martin should have assumed that Zimmerman was armed before he confronted him and maybe other kids running the streets now should do the same.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Wow. Thats messed up. Thats really messed up that you say its okay to kill kids.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

There are many kids who are younger than Martin who are doing time because they were charged as adults for their crimes. Martin might have been young in years but he was not just an innocent little kid and Zimmerman had no way of knowing Martin's age when he got jumped by him in the dark.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

He described him as a damn teen. Dont give me that bullshit.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

I don't recall hearing that he called Martin a teen but even if he did, Zimmerman was justified and the jury agreed.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

What the fuck? Is you crazy? The fucking hell is your damn problem. What are we goons or something now? Ignorant as fuck.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

I was with you until you said that Zimmerman should not have shot to kill. I was always told that you should always shoot to kill if you are in that situation. Also, if Martin thought Zimmerman was a sexual predator he should have called the cops or put some distance between himself and Zimmerman. Sucker punching someone can get you killed.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

If Zimmerman never woke up that morning none of this would have happened. If Zimmermann didn't go out on his watch none of this would have happened. If Zimmermann hadn't been in the same area of the neighborhood as Martin, none of this would have happened. The point is, he didn't really do anything more wrong by getting out of his car than any of those other things. It's what happened after that is important.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

The ends do not justify its means. Stay near your vehicle and avoid the situation. Matter of fact dont talk to me. I am done with you.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

He favors niggas being killed. It happens. Shit changes but the game is still the same.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

If you think this argument means anything against you, it doesn't. I'm trying to impartially debate.Zimmerman said that Martin was circling the car until he exited. This is never a good sign, usually it entails hostile intentions. I'm not trying to justify anything, but if Zimmermann was threatened while in the car, who is anyone to say that he was wrong to get out?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

She did say she was done with you. Yet you now choose to debate. Now we are debating logically. I see.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

So she can give an argument, say I'm done and I'm not allowed to respond? Where's the logic in that? I wasn't being disrespectful so there's really no issue here, but thanks anyway man.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Nigga what the fuck? You were mean to other in other debates but now you wanna debate. Also I aint yo nigga so dont call me "man". I dont know you like that.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Answer me this.....Why did he not stay in his fucking car? They told him they dont need him to leave. He did so anyway. He brought this upon himself and he gets to kill a man with no charge. Thats fucked up. Was the nigga gonna beat him with Skittles or something? Thats so deadly. Why did he leave the car then? Why didn't he listen and follow instruction?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

You don't know that! How do you make such a assumtion out of so little evidents? Yes he should of stayed in the car. He didn't. H e wanted to be a cop, spooked Trayvon and shot him in self defence. Now the NAACP is crying civil rights violations just because a black man dies, which is sad. Tell me, where they mad when OJ was aquited?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

The assumption that he should have stayed in his car? I dont know. Mayne because he would have avoided everything.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

I know that but, the fact is he didn't break the law by leaveing his car. Yes, he should have stayed! He failed to address himself Trayvon attacked him probebly because he thought he was a rapist and George shot him in self defence. This was FAR beyond a reasonable doubt!
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

I dont give a fuck if there is a law about leaving or staying in the car its ust common sense. Dont go after the nigga. Creeping on him and shit. If the cop said dont do it and you do it anyways and you kill the nigga in "self defense" thats fucked up. His death could have been prevented. Thats my point.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Yes, it could have been prevented but, George didn't know his actions would result in the death of Trayvon. He was going over to most likely ask him why he was there. In went violent because both of them paniced, Trayvon attacked what he thought was some sort of stalker and Zimmerman shot him in self defence. Your arguement could of happened but, there is suck a huge chance my story and George's stroy is true! What should we so? Throw him in jail because he could have murdered Trayvon not in self defence?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Trayvon was black. .
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Umm. I did know that. I was completely aware of that. I mean I think everybody is aware by now.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

I am on Trayvon's side, hun. .
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

He didn't steal Martin's life, Zimmerman was defending himself from getting his face beat in.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

He killed him. No matter what happen he still killed him.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

No, he didn't kill him, self defense is not murder or killing.---------------------
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Yes it is. He shot someone to death, no matter what, that is killing. But, there is justified killing, like this case, and unjustified called murder. But, no matter what, Zimmerman killed Martin.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Wrong, Zimmerman did not kill Martin, kill has the implication of violence or aggression, and Zimmerman defended himself as a counterpart to violence or aggression. Killing or murder are essential the same thing with varying defintions.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Kill means to extinguish a life. Zimmerman extinguished Martin's life. Therefore, Zimmerman killed Martin. If Zimmerman didn't kill Martin, what did kill him? Murder implies wrongful doing. I agree there is no wrongful doing here, so not murder. But, Martin's life was ended by his killer, that's just the definition of kill.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Kill involves the initation of violence, and Zimmerman didn't start the violence, that was Martin. Self defense is not killing, it is an counter to violence. Nobody killed Martin.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

Nobody killed Martin, what did? Natural causes?
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

It was a gun used in a confrontation by self defense to counteract a threat.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: Yes

But, you can't blame the gun, the person who used the gun is still responsible, right? Or is that only for murder? Sounds like a double standard. For murder the murderer killed the person. For self defense, it was the gun being used in a self defense situation that killed the person. That seems wrong.
Debate: George Zimmerman was just acquitted in the death of Travon Martin was he guilty?
Side: No

Never claimed that the blame is on the gun(classic straw man), the person is still responsible for the death of the person, but it was not a killing, it was self defense. Killing is not a countermeasure, it is a act of initiation.Definition of Self Defense: Self-defense or private defense is a countermeasure that involves defending oneself, one's property, or the well-being of another from harm.