Debate: Can government create jobs and wealth?
Side: yes

You would like that. State control of everything.Your love for Big Brother is strong.Your missing of the point is strong.Can you get any more irrational in your responses?I must not be making myself clear, if I am advocating the private sector, thenall of those services I am willing to pay for in the private sector based on my needs. I am not asking anything for free.Those services are presently provided by the state. Living as a citizen within the state means you owe the government payment in the form of taxes. It is not coerced by a gun unfairly, you owe your government that tax money. It is no more unfair than if you walked out of a store without paying for for something, and store security stopped you.Where did I say that I wanted for services for free? NOWHERE.Plus, I already said like a million times I am willing to pay for government military, police and courts.You and your kind constantly complain about taxes and insinuate that taxes are theft. It is as though you expect military, police, courts, etc. to operate for free.Wow, this really shows your lack of understanding the difference private sector and public sector. So Coca-cola is free? Or do you give them money for a product?If capitalism doesn't create new wealth, where does it come from? It trades hands.If you say government, this really only discredits you every sense of the imagination because government doesn't create wealth, it only takes.Governments create wealth through international trade agreements, state economic policies, and so on.Actually, Microsoft brought all sorts of wealth. First, 90,000 jobs were created since the birth of Microsoft, therefore, when a job is created, it is new wealth. How? because it added new goods and services; therefore, there is more consumption. More consumption means wealth. Second, Microsoft technologically has advanced our society beyond any imagination with its competitors. Third, it is inspires intellectual minds.Wealth traded hands. Microsoft created a product which everybody wanted, it created demand.Demand can act like wealth, but because resources are limited, what it actually does is transfer more of a limited resource into the hands of somebody.I laughed when I seen this sentence. Your continual grammatical mistakes make me think you are an immigrant. South or Central American perhaps?Trading is not wealth. Trade is an exchange. It is commerce or transaction. It is a form mechanism of capitalism, but wealth is creating nothing into something.We already discussed this. Demand. However what you seem to not appreciate is the finite nature of our resources which give our states an intrinsic amount of value (in their natural, rare, resources). If you base an entire economy on demand instead of concrete wealth in rare resources, you end up with inflation because demand can be for anything (including that which is limitless). In other words, if there is high demand for that which is limitless, and demand is all that keeps the economy afloat, then you're constantly adding "wealth" into the economy which is intrinsically worthless (limitless things have no intrinsic value), and there is increasing inflation.Again, I must laugh.This only shows your inept knowledge of economics.Seeing as you are basically a capitalist advocate of near-anarchy, who advocates child labour and sweatshops, and thinks tax is the same as theft... I'll take this as a sign that my views on economics are in the right direction.The study of economics is analyzing the scarcity of natural resources, and how to apply it in the most efficient matter and capitalism is the best tool.Apparently not.Gee, the business owner.... Most small businesses the work is done by the owner.You should have read the rest.