Debate: Creationism vs. Evolutionism
Side: creationism

If you'd rather believe the words of desert goat herders form the bronze age go ahead, or as in the case of your link the words of a priest written in ignorance in the 1920sSeriously, you're making this debate such an effin drag, man.If you want to believe what you believe then that is your entitlementI know it is, I never asked for your permission.Do you think it is not, it is accepted as true and thought in all decent. universities. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/  4/325.full.pdf+html (this may be a bit old, as it does not include baobabs but the info is sound.) Sound? You call that sound? A document telling me something is not sound evidence, my friend, it is very much lacking in evidence.The sarcasm is obviously lost on youNo but mine was clearly lost on you ;) I'd like to see the results of this in-depth study. I also have read a lot of creationist material as I do not comment unless I know.You’re asking me to type up a whole study that is a complete mess of papers in a bout three different ring binders and which one is not even in my house? That I don’t have time for.That's a good thing, it's better to know what the other side are propagatingTrue, even if its horseshit.This is a bold statement, the top scientists you speak of are using these data to make life better.Making life better for whom? And how does a study with no evidence make ones life more complete? This I fail to understand as would any other rational human being.As far as your link is concerned, this mans facts are old and out datedSo is the bible yet it’s the best selling book. Outdated? No such thing except from when it comes to food.he states that the world is 60 million years oldWrong, he gives an example such as “even if the world was 60 million years old…” (which he knows it isn’t), you read it wrong. He doesn’t believe the world to be anywhere near that amount of years old.The article goes on to state that their is no observed evolution, this is also completely rubbished by the work of John Endler, he observed the macro evolution of guppies where due to predation in a small few generations they lost their characteristic spots that were essential to mating, female fish without spots in the new system, where predation was introduced favored males with out spots, something that in their previous habitat was an essential to attracting a mate, that is, environmental adaptation in a large complex organism within a relatively short space of time. Evolution in action.Ahh, another single man who ‘witnessed’ “evolution in action”. These men – so selfish of them to hog the labs like that and not let anyone else in to see their amazing horseshit findings! Perhaps because there is nothing happening…There is also many untruths in his facts and figures, such as his estimate of how many species exist, this also puts his figures right outWho’s figures? My guy or your guy?There is too much on this article to dispute all, but I've thrown in a few nuggets to keep this debate moving, I hope you'll appreciate this, if there are individual points you think are relevant I'd be more than willing to go head to head on themGoody – my favourite part. Firstly, of course you cannot dispute it all, you barely even mentioned it. You just went on to talk about some scientist who apparently witnessed evolution in action. Doesn’t it strike you as rather odd that no man in your street or my street or even any one on my fucking island has ever witnessed “evolution in action” before? Rather odd indeed, no, it’s a fucking wake up call man. Secondly, your “nuggets” did nothing of the sort but rather only further showed your incapability to prove to me that evolution is fact which its not. Hey, I know what!! Someone recently told me in a post that I disprove arguments but fail to produce my own. Ok, well here mine is: God created the world, God created man, God did not create a big hairy ape that evolved into an upright human being who could read, write and pat the monkeys on the head that failed to ‘evolve into human beings’. So, how about you telling me some reasons why not to believe in creationism. Thirdly, let’s cut the sarcasm and between the lines insults – they’re gay and seriously, I will quit responding if you continue to act like a prick.Sometimes I think that you are reasonable and sometimes I think that you are being arrogant, please stop telling me your "rules", I'd be insulted if I was a lesser manLOL! Wow, that’s rich. So, I’m meant to take your shit but I can’t ask for my words to remain in context? Fuck you man, if you can’t debate like a mature grown up then its posts like this that will head your way. As you can tell, my approach to this debate is now reluctant and bored, you are the most dull and insulting debater. Perhaps you have potential but we will never know. As for the bit above this where I say ‘lets debate reasionably’ – forget that, I’m bored. You can call this ‘defeat’ if it makes you feel any better, but take a look at my ‘about me’ page and you will see that I don’t debate with people who insult me and debates that are a drag. Debate closed.