Debate: Should the government be regulating baby names?
Side: NO

Many people are unaware of that. And anyway, he was an American president, much more closer to home.And it's not like he's the equivalent of Hitler?Andrew Jackson slaughter thousands of Native Americas, is it illegal to name your kid after him?Again, he is not as known nor has been as significant as Hitler.It would still be offensive to anyone who knows anything about history. What about Joseph? You can still name your kid Joseph.AND the reputation Hitler has, who in the world wouldn't bully a child with that name?People with enough brain power to not think that the kid named Adolf or Hitler is the real guy.Oh so they must feel so depressed after they couldn't make their child have a weird name, which would result in the feeling different, and ridiculed in his school life after it, longing to be like everyone else with a normal name.Who decides what is weird? Exactly, to them a name may seem perfectly normal but when you hear it you would likely throw a hissy fit. Again, get your nose out of their damn business. Names that are too stupid that will cause bullying to the child, and make the child feel different in a bad way should not be encouraged. Do you give a shit about how the child would feel about being different?I don't encourage them and I don't discourage them either, its not my choice and its not yours either. I do care about kids who are bullied, I was bullied simply for being alive, it wouldn't have mattered if I had "Assfuck" as my name, I would have still been bullied.THOSE ARE NOT THE ONES I AM TALKING ABOUT IF YOU HAVE SEEN MY EXAMPLES.These names are alright, and I'd consider them normal.Most people would consider them to be strange. But we are not talking about slightly odd names. Without regulations, anyone can make completely odd names. The sky is the limit.God forbid someone names their kid something unusual. Again, what is unusual and is normal is opinion, so if someone wants to name their kid something weird that is their choice.THIS IS SO STUPID AND IRRELEVANT.WHAT THE HELL IS THIS JUSTIFICATION?Just trying to awaken you to the fact that most kids aren't like "whats your name? ha! now I'm gonna bully you" it starts out like this "that kid, I don't like him/her, I'm gonna bully him/her"So just because there are other factors for people to be bullied makes it okay for people to have another reason more to bully them?There is almost never an actual reason to bully another kid. Most of them time it is random, stop intruding in other people's lives.Only when the name is too far fetched and inappropriate that regulations should apply.And who determines that? You? The doctor? The government? It would all come down to opinion.Only when the name is too far fetched and inappropriate that regulations should apply.Its not depressing, it is just that some people (like myself) prefer to let people keep their rights instead of letting people like you take them away."Those willing to give up liberty for security deserve neither and will lose both" - Benjamin FranklinStupid logic again!IT WOULD PREVENT IT.I hate it when people ignore the word 'prevent'.I hate it when people ignore that it won't prevent anything and it will just leave the door open for the government to take away other rights.Its happened before, up until the the 1900's stayed out of foreign wars, then Wilson dragged us into WWI and then it opened up the door to all of our interventionist wars.Sometimes it's bad if they love them too much that they would name them "Little munchkin" or "BubzCutie".HNNNNNGGGG XFRHTHSGHSEHSH =/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/= The last part, its just oozing with intellect.