azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

1. A picture is worth a thousand words. TV lets you see and hear a story, or information. Imagine just reading about the recent disasters in Japan, Alabama and Missouri vs. seeing them and seeing interviews with survivors. Much more powerful and immediate on TV. 2. Books take too much time. TV gives the info much faster. 3. More interactive than books. People have said that books are more interactive because why? Because you have to turn the pages? Technology now allows you to vote and interact with TV programs. 4. Information is more current, right up to the minute. 5. People will say you can take your time with a book, pick it up whenever you like, stop, and re-read it. But with recording devices, you can do the same with TV programs. 6. Your hands are free to do other things while watching TV, whereas you have to hold books. You can knit, quilt, do homework, play a game while watching TV. You can even exercise - there are devices that let your exercise power up the TV. 7. You only need ONE TV to get all kinds of information and entertainment for years and years. You'd need walls full of books to do that. 8. Your TV set can double as a game screen, movie screen, etc. Your books can only be paperweights. 9. Easy way to keep kids entertained, and really, there's nothing wrong with that if it's used in moderation. You could argue that it makes kids (and adults) too sedentary, but the same is true of books. I am a total bookworm, too, but I've never thought of books as innately superior to TV. There's a lot of good to TV.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Unless the brain is used no human being can understand any medium. Be it TV or books. By watching the television people can create a make believe situation and think. "What if they would go left? They would be SAVED, wouldn't they?" Even viewing tv requires brains. And moreover we can watch television in the dark. But to read a book you need the lights on. Which also wastes electricity.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

It Improves academic skills of a child .Television has made children enthusiastic and confident.Children improve their academics and increase their ideas and innovations!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Yes I would say it has you relax in case your tired, but you can read to relax as well. Plus have you ever considered about the commercials and how annoying they are?
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

BOOKZ SUCK BECAUSE it iz harder To SPELL lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL :)
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I think T.V. is more helpful as the you can watch and listen to something being explained like if we read about budding or spore formation we have to create an image about that in mind, but when we watch the animation of budding then we could understand better. Some people can't even imagine so T.V. is helpful. As concerning the time limit or harm to our eyes, we should watch T.V. in a limit, because the excess of everything is harmful, even reading of books. Surveys have found that a normal person can remember 10% of what he had read and 50% of what he had listened and watched.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

A picture is worth a thousand words. TV lets you see and hear a story, or information. Imagine just reading about the recent disasters in Japan, Alabama and Missouri vs. seeing them and seeing interviews with survivors. Much more powerful and immediate on TV. Books take too much time. TV gives the info much faster.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Television shows images and pictures are so easy to watch while reading can take longer and you may not understand all the words so it takes a long time to read vs a picture of the story can teach you quickly.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Television uses electricity and books such as harry potter are made of trees so it causes more damage to the environment.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

yea, but electricity also harms the enviroment, cuz if you are using non renewable sources, like coal, then you are harming the environment more cuz of CO2
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is important for communication. This is to cross the charector limit.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

The overblown benefits of reading have long gone unchallenged as have the perils of TV viewing. The educational value of TV has been known even before the first lunar landing. TV has brought us up close to distant lands and cultures as well as important issues. We have listened to and watched political debates, interpreting gestures as well as content. Yes, even with fiction, TV leaves you to form conclusions based on tone, facial expressions, gestures, etc. Reading, on the other hand, "leaves little to the imagination", he said confidently. Consider the format for a novel. You can get a character's whole history delivered in writing before they even enter the room. Unfair comparisons between books an movies have long gone uncontested. Comparing a poorly produced movie to a well written novel does little to promote reading over TV. Try comparing a poorly written novel to a blockbuster movie classic and you will get the opposite results. TV is a superior medium for delivering educational content faster and more efficiently - a multimedia format that stimulates multiple senses. Other forms of content favor TV as well. Ever read a comedic monologue and find it as entertaining as watching it in real time on TV? How about reading the play by play of a sporting event vs watching it happen?
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I learned English through TV.Technically, I learned English through interaction with native speakers, but TV helped a lot more than books.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Because it is a source of entertainment also its help people that cant read :)
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

cuz the tv bettereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV can be better than books because TV can show the characters' faces and the action can be displayed that is hard for one to decipher from a book.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

i believe books are better(i believe i can fly...)So true
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Tv is better than books because it can ease the mind. Sure, it spoils the eye but books also spoil our eyesight because of how small the words are. Books also can stress the mind because of the font and size of the word, not to also mention that we don't understand the words and we have to imagine it. Television can improve our imagination but seeing what it is like. Books can also improve imagination but it isn't the way the writer is trying to show and it isn't the exact image the writer is telling us and we might be even more curious. The television tells us almost everything and shows how it is like unlike books. So I agree that TV is better than books
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV IS DA BEST IF YOU DO NOT LIKE TV U NEED A DOCTOR OH BABY TV IS DA BEST MATE LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

i think that tv are better then books because you can learn more on tv then reading books and u are releaxed
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

tv is better because it can give you live news lololollolollololololoolololollolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is better than books.... TV is entertaining but every book is not entertaining or intresting.... TV tell us new things..... latest news etc.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Tv is best ....... tv is better.... tv is better than books
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

OF COURSE TV is better than books. First and foremost, TV is very entertaining. When you read, Your bored af. when you watch Tv you can look at the weather. JUST LIKE TV BISSSSH
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

You can watch sports like AFL,cricket,NFL,soccer and tennis and the olympics. Books can also be expensive and you can lose them. Tv can be expensive but you only have to pay once. If you get a book you have to pay over and over again to get a new book.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

tv tv tv tv tv tv tv tv tv is a dog I am very smart just randomly typing things I don't understand why I am doing this to myself am my family and wtf is this amazing website I rated 5 stars
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

relaxing when watching television is good and releases stress in our body and we get to learn things faster by watching television instead of books
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I love books and consider them very important and useful. Nothing I'm about to write is meant to discredit or devalue books.But TV is more universally consumable. An entire family ranging from infant to retiree can watch the same TV same time and appreciate it in their own ways. Furthermore, people vote with their actions and the reality of modern life is more people spend more time at their TV (or other electronic media, too, like their computer or cell) than they do reading an old fashioned book. Furthermore, although the depth of information can be far better in a book, the information from TV can be assimilated faster and in more ways.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Hi, we did a debate at school and tv won. When we looked at this site it had really good information. Hi pikachu. And don't be surprised peeps!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV can relief stress and you can share laughs with family!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is better than books because some people can't read and books use paper from trees.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Yeah! TV is better than books because it allows us to learn extra things from National Geographic Channel and Discovery channel. 1> Television is time saving. 2> TV is interesting. 3> There are many better things on TV nowadays, like YouTube. One can get any  information on YouTube. 4> To some people (like me), books are too lengthy and one would not be interested  in books if TV provides the same information. 5> You can easily switch topics on TV by switching channels. 6> TV costs less while it provides better services. 7> No book can beat Disney+ and Netflix.I am saying all these because I prefer Television over those lengthy, ugly and enormous books. Different people's views always differ.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

A picture is worth a thousand words TV shows hundreds of pictures in a matter of seconds. TV is more interactive Toddlers talk to Mikey Mouse on tv but they don't talks to Mikey Mouse with books. People say reading is better because you can read ,but you can use subtitles and read them while watching TV right? Technically TV is more fun because you get dopamine which makes you addicted
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

books causes too much deforestation which is harmful for the environment plus it takes too long to update them. Adding on to this, if someone is unable to read for any reason, they can learn the same way as others who can read.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is not necessarily better than books. In terms of entertainment, TV is better than books, but in terms of depth and concentration, books are much better. Look at the kids who can notice that. But don't worry about death run 3d. Combining the two is a smart choice
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I appreciate you sharing this. Recently, I've done a lot of looking. During my hunt, I came upon this capybara clicker
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Coming to the hot summer, I am choosing for myself a healthy game to be able to entertain with friends. connect dots is an attractive puzzle game with different levels of shapes, and roller baller is a casual ball game with beautiful graphics. I am quite confused to choose an elite game.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

it is t.v.not phone,tvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Yes, this is a fantastic article, but I believe connecting to Yo WhatsApp apk before streaming is a better option.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

India Travel Blog to find holiday packages or Usha Destinations in India. IndiaTravelBlog is one of the best Indian travel blogs where people share their travel experiences in various tourist places in India.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

The age of 33 was a crucial year in the life of Prophet Muhammad as it marked the beginning of his prophetic mission. The revelations he received during this time laid the foundation for the beliefs and practices of Islam. Despite facing opposition, the message of monotheism and the call to justice and morality continued to spread among the early converts.romshippowisheshippoIf you have any more specific questions or would like to know about events in Prophet Muhammad's life after the first revelation, please feel free to ask.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Hey, TV vs. Books! 📺📚 Personally, I'm Team TV for the visuals, but what about podcasts? They bring a whole new dimension
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Engaging and insightful, your blog effortlessly weaves together information and clarity, making it a delightful read for anyone seeking valuable knowledge.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Determining whether TV or books are better ultimately depends on individual preferences and the specific context. TV offers visual storytelling with sound and motion, making it immersive and convenient for some people. On the other hand, books provide a unique experience of engaging imagination and intellect, allowing readers to interpret characters and settings in their minds.Both mediums have their advantages and disadvantages. TV can provide immediate entertainment and visual stimulation, making it easier for some to consume stories quickly. However, it may lack the depth and detail that books often offer. Books, while requiring more time and focus, allow for deeper exploration of characters, themes, and emotions.In the end, whether TV or books are better is subjective and depends on personal preferences, the specific content being compared, and the individual's goals and interests. Some may prefer the visual and auditory experience of TV, while others may value the depth and introspection that books provide. Ultimately, both mediums have their place in storytelling and offer unique experiences to their audiences.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I am grateful that you shared this knowledge with me. I really like the article you have made on your blog very much. capybara clicker
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Great article. Fascinating to read. I love Basket Random reading such an excellent article.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Yes its a great article but i think connecting to Nordvpn mod apk before streaming is a more good idea
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I believe that viewing an instructional channel on television is preferable to reading books because you can move between channels and look for cookie clicker documentaries on various themes, and when you are finished learning and want to relax, you can switch to a humorous program or anything you want to watch.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV can be an education to little kids. TV is also an entertainment.Television can teach kids important values and life lessons. If you struggle at reading videos can help you.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV can relieve stress and you can share laughter with your family! and the flagle game brings interesting experiences.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I agree with the point of preferring TV over books. Young people today mostly approach TV more than reading books and fleeing the complex
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

For me, television is better than books. I hate reading and writing. Back in college, I used resources for help research papers for sale https://essaykeeper.com/research-paper-for-sale  It saved my nerves and time
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Of course books are better than TV. It destroys society. I would like to mention that TV does not have conscience, moral principles and shame. Besides, it promotes violence, debauchery and cynicism. In addition, today television takes the role of up bringer for our children. However, almost all the cartoons promote violence and as the result children grow up angry and without any sense what is good and what is bad, what is right and what is wrong. Today teenagers do not have the desire to develop their knowledge. They just sit down near the TV and watch rubbish and as usual they do not have any topics to discuss.Nowadays television has bad influence not only on children but also on adults. I would like to consider this issue as an example the sitcom "Married...with children" because my family watches it and I decided to find out the meaning of this TV series. Soon i realized that it is the propaganda of ignorance, disrespect women to men and to seniors.An adult can understand that it is exaggerated, mocking look at our reality, but the child absorbs information in its pure form.However, when you read a book you develop your imagination, vocabulary and train memory. Besides, very often a person can find answers to many questions of concern to human and sometimes solutions to any problems connecting with not only with romantic relationships but with global problems such as finding meaning in life and choosing the right path. In the heroes of the books we often can find similar traits of character, outlook and attitude towards life. There is is no wonder that a lot of people have their favorite literary characters and when people read about them in particular book, they cognize themselves and reveal the hidden potential of own character.In addition, reading the works of good writers makes a person think as smoothly as in the book. Swear words disappear from the lexicon and language become more intelligent. Besides, it becomes easier to write a letter, essay, composition and poem.To my mind people should read books as more as it possible in order to stop degradation!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Tv is awesome!!,!,!,!, boooks bad. Books are awesome! Tv is bad. Books let mind grow. I don't know which is better but probs books.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

In order to write a good article or a story that people want to read, the author needs to have good judgment and a sharp eye. I will remember your article for a long time. 2048 game.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Book are better than TV because when you read you became smarter and your writing skills are more correct day by day, you will not have a mistakes because reading is very helpful for human beings , if you read books you improve your knowledge and books can avoid you from degradation of your brain. There are many arguments why books are better ,I can say best of all even of the Internet. If you are interested in book of your choice , you can read it from the morning till the midnight and anyone will not desterb you but when you watching TV ? You can waste your time just for watching advertisements is it good for you ? I don't think so.There are no advertisements in books.Books are portable and can be carried around. TV's are less portable. If you want to read , you can read everywhere you want , in bus, on the station, in taxy everywhere you want, but what about TV is it suitable? It's not. I prefer books, because we can read while travelling.Books are great, they are good for everything. I think if person doesn't love read the books he doen't tried it because it's unforgattable feeling to finish book you loved and start it again..... Books are better anyway ! ;)
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Why can't books be violent? Also violence is a part of entertainment, most people would have enough common sense not to start a mass murder after some bloddy tv show. Also TV isn't uneduacational. We just choose to not watch the helpful parts of it, and so goes the same with books. When you read a book, you don't actually learn anything. It's not like anyone really rereads, checks for comprehension, looks at every single misunderstood word in the dictionary, takes notes about how the author writes, you get it. All we do (most of us atleast) when we read a book is just sit back and enjoy the story. And if you say you read non fiction? So do I, and also nonfiction on a TV.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

well books can promote sex, drugs and TV as well I read an article saying that tv is better for teaching babies
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

tv and books can promote sex and drugs. It just depends on rating or classification
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Books are better than TV because books have each and every detail briefly . we get to read books like story books , fairy tales, ghost stories etc these books help us in bringing imaginary power in us . In TV only some points are explained and sometimes we cant remember it easily but in books if we forget anything we can now and then read it .At last I only want to tell that books are much and much better than TV .
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

One Flew over the Cuckoos Nest, East of Eden, Nabokov's Lolita, 1984, Martian Chronicles - I could go on and on. For real. There's very little that beats the world described in books.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

One Flew over the Cuckoos Nest, East of Eden, Nabokov's Lolita, 1984, Martian Chronicles - I could go on and on. For real. There's very little that beats the world described in books.I just finished Martian Chronicles the other day, I enjoyed many of the short stories. Did you like the Usher II "log?" I thought it was clever how the guests' ignorance of literature brought on by their book burnings made them vulnerable to those ironic deaths.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

I just finished Martian Chronicles the other day, I enjoyed many of the short stories. Did you like the Usher II "log?" I thought it was clever how the guests' ignorance of literature brought on by their book burnings made them vulnerable to those ironic deaths.I wouldn't call them guests inasmuch as they were the enemy, who would censor literature (and consequently the expression and trade of ideas). But I also enjoyed it. Thoroughly. My favorite short story is the one in the Martian insane asylum, where everyone ends up dying and/or committing suicide. I can't recall the name of the particular story.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

I wouldn't call them guests inasmuch as they were the enemy, who would censor literature (and consequently the expression and trade of ideas).I noticed this as a recurring theme in Fahrenheit 451. I wonder if the short story Usher II was a prelude to his idea for the future book revolving around censorship.My favorite short story is the one in the Martian insane asylum, where everyone ends up dying and/or committing suicide. I can't recall the name of the particular story.Oh, yes, I plum forgot about that one. The Earth Men it was called, and I didn't quite expect the insane asylum turn.