Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

"And this can back fire on you. If something can't be created from nothing, then who created your god?" God has no creator, He is eternal. You can't apply the natural sciences to the supernatural. "So You are only a humble person because of fear, if you don't see whats wrong with that, then you are just foolish." We are to humble ourselves before God. It's because He is the Almighty Creator that you must humble yourself out of respect. Those who do not fear (respect and humble themselves) God will be arrogant and sinful in all aspects of their life. "You could not be more wrong, you see any atheist running into a building blowing themselves up? you see any atheist molesting a child? (yes im talking about the priests). Now i believe you are confusing atheists with psychopaths but since you aren't educated i guess you don't know what that is." There are plenty of atheists molesting children, priests make up only a minute percent of those crimes. Far more atheists murder then suicide bombers. Do you remember Stalin? "In 2008, Vox Day notes concerning atheism and mass murder: Apparently it was just an amazing coincidence that every Communist of historical note publicly declared his atheism … .there have been twenty-eight countries in world history that can be confirmed to have been ruled by regimes with avowed atheists at the helm … These twenty-eight historical regimes have been ruled by eighty-nine atheists, of whom more than half have engaged in democidal acts of the sort committed by Stalin and Mao … The total body count for the ninety years between 1917 and 2007 is approximately 148 million dead at the bloody hands of fifty-two atheists, three times more than all the human beings killed by war, civil war, and individual crime in the entire twentieth century combined. The historical record of collective atheism is thus 182,716 times worse on an annual basis than Christianity’s worst and most infamous misdeed, the Spanish Inquisition. It is not only Stalin and Mao who were so murderously inclined, they were merely the worst of the whole Hell-bound lot. For every Pol Pot whose infamous name is still spoken with horror today, there was a Mengistu, a Bierut, and a Choibalsan, godless men whose names are now forgotten everywhere but in the lands they once ruled with a red hand. Is a 58 percent chance that an atheist leader will murder a noticeable percentage of the population over which he rules sufficient evidence that atheism does, in fact, provide a systematic influence to do bad things? If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation committed by Christians, even though atheists have had less than one-twentieth the number of opportunities with which to commit them. If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large-scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case. Once might be an accident, even twice could be coincidence, but fifty-two incidents in ninety years reeks of causation!" Quoted source http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#Atheism_and_Mass_Murder  "No sir i do not know what caused the big bang, but i certainly don't rely on fairy tales to answer that question." You prove you are uneducated here, you imply the Bible is a fairytale yet you have no way to prove or disprove it. Such claims are based on conjecture, and further prove your ignorance. That and of course you don't cite any sources for your theories (conjecture without evidence). "But here is how my ethics and morals work." Let me stop you right there, since the point flew way over that tiny brain of yours. You can't claim 'your ethics' when they all descend from religious law. Morals of not murdering and stealing date back to pre-Mesopotamian era. That is before secular historians claim we formed settlements and became sedentary. So then it must mean these morals are 'wired' in us. I would ask that you do some simple research before bringing non-sensical conjecture to an argument. "As for abortion, It is only a human life after 12 weeks before that it is just a bunch of cells. It is like saying you want to save every sperm cell and every egg because it maybe a child one day." You contradict your beliefs here. Doesn't the atheist agenda say it's not human until its born. Sperm alone and an egg alone doesn't have the potential for life. A fertilized egg does have the potential for life. If it can become a living breathing human, then it's murder to cease this process. I think an important step for pro-choice people to take, is to demonstrate abortions on themselves. Since it's not murder it won't be suicide. Just call it an 'abortion' right?