Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: No

In absolutely no circumstance should a perfect Christian put a member of his family before pleasing God. Irrespective of whether atheists sometimes put themselves before their family, a Christian should never put their family before their faith. This is the evil that Christianity creates. No, and again, stating that this is evil is your subjective interpretation of anothers actions. Even so that predicament is not inherently evil. In fact it only contests some ideals that society holds. Society is only the accumulation of rejected and accepted ideals by authority figures in society. This argument is weak in and of itself.  Thankfully there are Christians that aren't very good Christian that would put their family before their faith but they are not as good a Christian as they should be.Useless information that doesn't show that teaching a child a religion is child abuse. I'll try and explain how they are not the same. Child A is raised a Christian. Child B is raised an atheist. Child A is taught that homosexuality is wrong. Child B is left to form his own opinion. Both children met homosexuals throughout their lives. They see that they are good people and that there is nothing about their sexuality that causes harm to other. Child B assimilates all of his experiences and forms a view based on his observations: he wants gay people to be happy and sees no harm in what they do. Child A experiences the same things but his morality develops differently. Irrespective of the fact that he himself wants gay people to be happy and sees no harm in their acts, homosexuality is immoral to him. He campaigns strongly for limits to the rights of homosexuals. His justification? Because the Bible, his church, and his parents told him so.Both children learn from their experiences, that is true. The difference is that child A MUST not follow his own feelings and justifications for gay relations. He MUST follow the Bible. Or else he is not a Christian. By forcing a child to be a Christian you create an self-identity that directly conflicts with the morals they may develop.This follows a biased assumption as well. You assume that Christians aren't accepting of gays when the bible clearly tells them not to judge other and to treat them better than they would treat themselves, thus your entire argument is flawed. Even then there are Atheists who don't like gays. You are aruing with a biased intent. You have flawed your own argument while ignoring the principles of religion. Christians are commanded to accept gays. I still see no child abuse. Also is morality is subjective then again the child abuse is absent since morality isn't objective. This lack of objectivity allows for the formation of many different moral codes. Personal morality and law is not the same. There are many things that are legal but immoral (being generally a prick to people is one example) and there are many things that are illegal but moral to society at large (laws on copyright and certain frauds, for example).An atheists morality is not bound by law.This is the same for Christians. Christians are to obey law in the same fashion Atheists do. Atheists may hold opinions that differ from the law in the same fashion as a Christian would. Again, where does this constitute child abuse? It was not off-topic. It was a rebuttal to your original statement that it cant be abuse because the child does not cry. A child does not always cry at abuse.I see. So then relate that to the teaching of religion and demonstrate how this is child abuse. You have yet to show me how.