Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

Then why is a woman pressured by society to change her name upon marriage but not a man? Because marriage is a Christian institution (in this case), and the Christian faith is inherently misogynistic. It does not reflect the attitude of general society.And don't get me started on the image of the female body.Males have evolved to find the image of the female body an inherently sexual one. It is impossible to revert this.All women are, are things to look at that help around the house and make sons.Women generally comprising one half of the population of any given nation, it is surely not beyond their capacity to resist objectification. Indeed, I submit that no such general suppression could have been maintained, nigh everywhere and through most of human history, without some inherent meekness on their part.Just as racism is a personal opinion and cannot be banned but it should not be tolerated.Racism is more than an opinion, as sexism is. It is an evolved trait. It ought, like other natural traits, to be conquered by philosophy and not by force.You infer that women are inferior at something dominated by men for 6,000 years (because just 40 years ago women were allowed to enter the workforce)?What is this "allowed"? Why must women be "allowed" by men to do anything, if women are equal to men? How can one equal force dominate another without its collusion?You really didn't have to add the last part about small breasts.I did. If you read the argument to which I answered, you would observe a reference to small penises, to which my statement about breasts was an obvious reaction.Now you're just picking on someone you deem inferior to you and you're attempting to devalue them using things you think might hurt their dignityNo, I was pointing out, in an ironic fashion, that mine opponent was doing so. Perhaps if you thought before you typed, this would become clear.Why don't you do some research on the history of feminism?What has this to do with my juxtaposition?Maybe the sexist of men can finally win the right to vote or enter the workforce or not be criticized by his breast size by the opposite sex.This is gibberish.Men also didn't have to face 6,000 years of patriarchy and oppression based on their sex, only achieving explicit freedom of sexism just 40 years ago, still fighting implicit sexism and some other forms of explicit sexism today.I acknowledge this to be the reason for our apathy. Would you like it if someone told you you were inferior because the only thing you were good at was lifting furniture?I'd just refuse to lift any more furniture, until the inertia of bookcases caused them to retract the appraisal. What if an entire society thought like that?Most of society are consumerist, dishonourable and uneducated fools, who cogitate with their reproductive organs and pray to spirits. I am more concerned by this, than by sexism.You don't know what it's like to feel like somehow you're less of a human being because you were born with a uterus.That is an exaggeration. It has nothing to do with the presence of a uterus.But that opinion hurts.The concept of "freedom of conscience" would mean little if it applied only to benign opinions. That's half the human population.Half the human population should not have taken six thousand years to do something about sexism.I have the right to be respected as an equal just as much as you doI endeavour to respect you, but your lack of intellect or understanding makes this a difficult undertaking. I don't view you lesser than me just because you're a man and I expect the same respect in return.I have strenuously declared that I do not regard women as morally inferior, but you have ignored these declarations.It can ultimately destroy everything humanity has worked so hard for.That is nonsense. The bulk of our progress was made during the millennia in which sexism was rampant and institutionalised. It is therefore impossible to demonstrate that sexism is likely to erase that progress.