azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

For. I really don't get what's wrong if someone is homosexual. That's how they feel and they can't change that. The fact that people are so unsupportive of that is what's actually sickening. Honestly. We all talk about aliens (people I don't believe in) and when they will come and crap like that, yet we can't even accept the differences among each other.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Is it right for me? No. Is it right for others? Who the hell am I to say? For that matter, who the hell is anyone to say what is right or wrong for any other as long as it doesn't hurt others? People who judge others need to mind their own f*ing business!! Those who cast judgement and assert their beliefs as "holier than thou" are psychopathic control freaks. How would I react if I learned my son were gay? Well, I wouldn't be thrilled since I'd like to have grandkids someday, but he's still my son and I wouldn't love him any less. I'd understand he was born that way and I'd encourage him to feel happy and comfortable being who he is.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I don't think homosexuality is either right or wrong. It just is. If doesn't bennifit soceity, nor does it hurt soceity (at the moment). Should there ever come a time when the number of birthes drops signifigantly, we may need to revisit the issue. But for right now, let's all just mind our own buissness when it comes to letting people find their soul mate.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

To start off, the views should have been yes and no. ANYWAYS, I am answering For, as in I am for Human Rights. I really am unsure how to answer this. Homosexuality has been discovered to be linked with genetics. You are either homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual, or any other -sexual variation I have not listed. You are born this way. I do not believe in God, and am against the Catholic church for condemning homosexuality. It is this, and a few other unrelated views, that makes me dislike the Catholic church. I respect the religious views of everyone, but do not support the idea that 'God made us all' and 'God made it so naturally we would select a mate of the opposite sex to have children with and reproduce' It has been proven that a gay gene exists, this being said, who are we to condemn those who are genetically different?
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

There is nothing wrong with being a homosexual. Homosexuality is very common and natural.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Common? Yes. Natural? No. Nothing wrong with it? Are you sure, it seems pretty unnatural to me.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Well. It might be icky to some people, I guess, but I don't really think that's a premise for condemning it. Also it... kind of is natural. I mean, you don't even really have to go that far from home to see it either. I mean, not that I'm one to watch dogs hump one another, but uh, I have managed to catch a glimpse of it before pulling a one-eighty and walking away.Also might I add that there's a difference between having a sexual preference and being a whore. I'm pretty sure on that one.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Penises aren't meant to go in a butthole, just a fact. I'm pretty sure you wouldn't touch your own crap let alone want to put your penis in where crap in general comes from or someone elses crap. Not right.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Penises aren't meant to go in a butthole, just a fact.See, the problem here is, I don't really deal in religion, so if you want to prove this to me, you're going to have to prove why this is a fact instead of just stating it's a fact. And yeah sure, it's a little weird, but it ain't hurtin' nothin'.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Biologically they aren't meant to go there and God also says they shouldn't go there. Trust me it's hurting more than you know, more than you know......
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

You know, I really don't think biology ever had a plan to begin with and hey! They fit. So obviously, someone found out something or another. And like I said, I don't deal in religion, so your second point is kind of moot.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Go live in a cave or a tree like a chimpanzee. That's natural. Your house, car and workplace, unnatural!!!
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

How can anything be unnatural? If it's a human choice, or deposition, or defect, or disease, or whatever you believe, its human, we're human, and humans are part of nature.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

All That is not unnatural, that's produced by humans naturally adapting to produce self enjoyment for themselves, which humans naturally have a limitless desire for.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Homosexuality has been a part of mankind since before Christ existed! Alexander the Great for one, was a bisexual; and Oscar Wilde was gay. And how is it any of your business who a person can choose to love? Didn't Jesus go on about loving one's enemies and all that entailed?
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Jesus has always existed, he is God, and God has existed before all man or anything at all. Alexander the Not-So-Great must have have been one of the biggest STD spreaders in history than!!! Lets all praise him for the great things he has done like spreading STDs!!!
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

If Jesus is God, than why is he referred to as the SON OF GOD? Following that how can Mary be a virgin, if the Holy Spirit impregnated her? And if your holy spirit is part of the trinity, than does that mean God impregnated Mary and then had himself? Oh, brilliant. Your worshiping someone that gave birth to himself and then called himself his son. Me thinks God has a bipolar personality disorder coupled with a narcissistic ego.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Triune, three in one, paradoxical, in our universe yes, in God's no....
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Ain't nothin' wrong with a 'lil faggotry now and then. And it may go against the bible, but definitely not nature. Unless well, you just discount all of the evidence insisting that our animal brethren don't commit acts of a homosexual nature.Maybe I'm just desensitized. That might be it.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

You might have a chance actually. Animals aren't our brethren either. I had a dog who was a Boston Terrier and if you got him excited or by making him too hyper he'd go hump a pillow. He didn't know what the hell he was doing, but he just did it. Why? Because he's an animal, an innocent, unknowing animal. What does this have to do with anything many might ask? When another animal humps another animal of the same gender it's humping to hump like my dog not knowing what the hell it's humping unlike humans. Humans know what we do.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Well of course we know what we do. If you deal in terms of logic, then a man having sex with another man is a neutral exchange. Nothing is lost. Nothing is gained. It's grody, but it's not really like anything bad happens or kitten suddenly explode. I can't really attack homosexuality, because there's nothing to attack. Nobody dies when two men have themselves some good ol' fashioned lovin'. Well. I guess unless one of them has AIDS and they don't use protection. Then their dumb-asses deserve whatever repercussions are coming their way. But that's not really a sexual-preference related issue. Mainly because AIDS doesn't just target homosexual men.Besides, how do you define innocence, and how exactly do you determine how smart or stupid an animal has to be before they are aware of their own actions? Well. I hear, and maybe it's only a rumor, but from what I understand, Dolphins are pretty smart puppies. They can communicate and everything. And they perform acts of gay sex and rape.(Dorsal hole rape, even.) I hardly consider them innocent. Damn dolphins.But right. My point. Maybe if there was something tangible lost when two dudes boned, I'd have a problem with it. But there isn't. Nobody dies. Nobody gets hurt. It's not so much that it isn't innocent or it isn't 'gross,' but really that, in the grand scheme of things, what people do in their free time pretty much doesn't matter. And besides, if it does turn out to be a terrible, terrible sin, by the whole Christian religion, they can just ask for forgiveness and bamf they're good to go.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Theres nothing to attack? You just said it's grody?How about it's unnatural or it's against the Bible, or it's sickening? Another man putting his penis in another mans butt or two women rubbing up against each other is perfectly fine? It's almost a disease I must say. Animals in general are innocent like a baby if you say because babies are innocent and I guess you would say raping a baby is okay also right? I kill people in my mean time (not really) so it's not affecting you is it? Of course not because I'm allowed to do whatever I want in my free time. They can ask but they better mean it, and unlike most sins God allows their hearts to harden against what is right and wrong and that means they can no longer see what they are doing wrong, they can't tell they are drowning and it seems as if they need someone to put their arm in the water and tell them to grab it to pull them out which you guys don't allow Christians to do, you guys are killing them by not allowing us Christians to help them! I only want to save them but you guys think they are perfectly fine down there drowing, just because they are looking up smiling doesn't mean they are okay.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

How about it's unnatural or it's against the Bible, or it's sickening?People do things that are against the bible all the time, and we don't even take a second to bat an eyelash at them. Because nobody cares anymore. Most of the things that came from the bible were written by men anyways.I kill people in my mean time (not really) so it's not affecting you is it?This is a logical fallacy. You're equating a negative-sum to a neutral-sum. Dick-butting isn't going to hurt anyone. Murdering someone is. And I would care about that very much.I only want to save them but you guys think they are perfectly fine down there drowing, just because they are looking up smiling doesn't mean they are okay.So what's your position on masturbating or nocturnal emissions?
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

People do things that are against the bible all the time, and we don't even take a second to bat an eyelash at them. Because nobody cares anymore. Most of the things that came from the bible were written by men anyways. The Bible wasn't written by men and I care. I and many real Christians who will now by silenced by your kind any more, this world is getting sick the USA has been in liberal control with the accept everything and anything mentality and we have gone way downhill to an almost unfixable position. I and many REAL Christian will not by silenced no longer and most of you cannot accpet that, I and many REAL Christians cannot sit on the sideline any longer while people like you kill my country and ruin everything because you can't draw a line unless it benefits you and no one else but you and your kind.This is a logical fallacy. You're equating a negative-sum to a neutral-sum. Dick-butting isn't going to hurt anyone. Murdering someone is. And I would care about that very much.But I'm doing it in my spare time so you shouldn't care, let me do what I want because it's my right supposedly.So what's your position on masturbating or nocturnal emissions?Depends on what masturbate to in a way although I believe it's gross. I don't know what you mean by nocturnal emissions, please elaborate what you mean.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I'm not going to lie, I am having so much fun. So much fun.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Yes so am I. So am I, this is so much fun...
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Hey at least we agree on something. Unless you're being sarcastic. In which point, hey at least I have something.Also I really can't trust the bible. I mean they did say that god wrote it, but men transcribed it and were like y'know, read to it by angels, and seriously, men fuck everything up. Intentionally, unintentionally or otherwise. I mean just look at what they're doing right now. Totally fucking up.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Yes we're both having fun as that's why I joined this site unlike Ben..... Trust me the Bible is very dependable, have you even read it? If not you know absolutely nothing of what you are talking about or are blatantly trying to sound like an idiot off of the terrible show Family Guy? Yes I mean we are! Girls screwin girls, men screwin men! I mean seriously! Plus these "men" were filled with the Holy Ghost so there was no way they could screw up as really they weren't even in control in a way.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

Yes it is. It is not 'homosexual' it is actuallysame sex attraction or homophilia. I am not talking about trans-persons those who are physically disabled from birth, they need care, protection and have rights. I am talking about same sex attractions. Sex is possible between a male and female in every living beings, it's basic objective is procreation or creating offspring to transfer genetic information and life. In fact, there some other ways to transfer genetic information and life to another generation in some species. But commonly among living beings sex is the only way for this. It is a necessity for the nature so naturally an attraction between opposite sexes created. It is similar to consumption of food, to sustain the organic life in the nature we naturally feel appetite. One can eat food for their proper health or can consume more, that leads to obesity and unhealthy conditions. It create disorder in nature, may lead over consumption of resources, carbon dating, scarcity of food etc. It is harmful for the society aswellas for the nature. Just like that, sexual intercourse can be misused like homophilia, pedophilia, beastophilia etc. Semen consists of sperm and other things to preserve the life of the sperms to their journey to ovum. Also the female reproduction system with it's full processes is fully dedicated to create the life with sperm. That's why from puberty female body is changing to create enough muscles and strength in thighs and back - to carry the baby. It is not just in the case of humans but for all living beings in those the procreation is done through sexual intercourse. So the sole purpose of 'sex' is to create life, ie to transfer the life and hence the genetic information. So the nature can keep organic life in it's biospheres. So firstly, it is harmful for the society as it is anti-nature or anti-social. Eventually the nature will take remedies to tackle these things for the equilibrium, may lead to a mass extinction in future. Homophilia, Beastophilia (Zoophilia), Incest, erotic fetishism or Pedophilia have similar arguments. So if we agree with same sex attractions we have to agree with other paraphilias as they raise the same arguments. So it is harmful for the society in that way too. Homophilia is actually same time a bad habit with extreme sexual desires (they want some strange ways) and an addiction, like drug addiction or alcohol addiction, and also a mental disorder. Just take an example of alcohol addiction - it is more or less similar to homophilia.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

Yes! Faggotry is always negative to society! What's next? Incest?
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

Give me any good reason outside of bible verses. chances are you cannot. society sees this as a terrible ace because of our dominant religion Christianity, I have not seen any other reasons this is a bad thing. they quote Leviticus and claim it evil. Without the bible tell me why it is bad.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

I'll probably catch a lot of flack for this...Yeah, you're bloody right about that, you troll. How are those facts?Are Christians harmful? Yes. Why? Because for thousands of years they've stifled dissent from every other important group of people.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

We spend billions of dollars a year treating aids patients, so there is also financial harm.Your point is? We also spend billions of dollars on the military as well as other things. Yes, but is it worth the billions of dollars? Or are we wasting it when we could be treating more urgent problems? This is only meant to be an example, not to seem impertinent, despite the fact that the highest cause of HIV transmission rates are understandably highest; it is an example of either statistical manipulation or carelessness - the majority of the population are heterosexual!
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

"If a self-employed business owner with strong religious convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and goes bankrupt, is he harmed?People aren't sued for not providing services; and if they are, they certainly aren't going to go bankrupt from one court case."Remember the bakers who refused to bake a gay wedding cake? They weren't forced out of business, but they did have to close their store and relocate to their home. And a small business CAN be forced out of business if sued."If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to homosexual couples, is someone hurt?Um... I'm pretty sure an institution (such as an orphanage) cannot refuse people just because of their sexuality. Forced to comply? Yes. Forced to shut down? No."You don't think they would shut down, rather than place children in an environment that they believe would be harmful to them? Think again."If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed?OMFG. Seriously? Majority of people are god damn Christians. CHRISTIANS ARE NOT BEING PROSECUTED."Christians are not a majority. The Bible even says so. "Narrow is the way that leads to life, and FEW there are who find it." I would guess that at least 90% of people, who claim to be Christians, are not. And Christians ARE being persecuted. They are probably one of the most persecuted groups in the world today."Add to this the fact that the vast majority of aids victims are homosexuals." In many developed countries, there is an association between AIDS and homosexuality or bisexuality, and this association is correlated with higher levels of sexual prejudice, such as anti-homosexual/bisexual attitudes. There is also a perceived association between AIDS and all male-male sexual behavior, including sex between uninfected men. However, the dominant mode of spread worldwide for HIV remains heterosexual transmission."Homosexual men, are about 50 times more like to get aids. Look at the numbers again. There are more heterosexual cases, true. But there are also about 30 times more of them. MSM are responsible for about 25% of new cases. Per capita.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality and pulls his child out of school and because of it is ridiculed and/or jailed, is he harmed?This doesn't happen. It is illegal to take a child out of school and not educate them but it is okay to move schools. Its their choice.If a self-employed business owner with strong religious convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and goes bankrupt, is he harmed?Yes. Criminal deserve to suffer the consequence of their actions.If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to homosexual couples, is someone hurt?If the children go to atheist children's homes, then no.If a public school teacher voices his disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in his own home, on his own computer and is fired from his teaching position, is he harmed? Teachers cannot do things that brings their school into disrepute. Including this. If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the congregation harmed? This is an illegal act. The person that does this should be treated like any other criminal.If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed?Too vague to answer.When morally conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are they harmed?Most conservatives are big enough, fat enough and bald enough to be able to take it ;)
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

"If a self-employed business owner with strong religious convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and goes bankrupt, is he harmed?Yes. Criminal deserve to suffer the consequence of their actions."How is one a criminal for following deeply held religious beliefs? What if a Christian photographer was asked to do a nude photo shoot? Are you saying it would be a crime for him to refuse? What if a Jewish baker was asked to bake a Nazi themed wedding cake? Does he not have the right to refuse?
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

Because freedom of religion, much like freedom of speech, is respected only insofar as it does not infringe upon the rights of others.The Old Testament prescribes stoning for numerous offenses; Christians and Jews are not allowed to stone sinners to death either.Part of holding a business license is agreeing not to discriminate against protected classes. This is why businesses can be sued for not being handicapped accessible, for example. In many jurisdictions now, sexual orientation is considered a protected class. Your examples do not fit, because desiring a nude photo shoot, or supporting the nazis, do not constitute protected classes.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

How is one a criminal for following deeply held religious beliefs? Because when someone runs a business in a country with a secular government they have to obey by it's laws. As I understand it, the USA has laws against discrimination.hat if a Christian photographer was asked to do a nude photo shoot? Are you saying it would be a crime for him to refuse? What if a Jewish baker was asked to bake a Nazi themed wedding cake? Does he not have the right to refuse?He has a right to refuse to do something that he doesn't usually do. So yes he can refuse to do the things you mentioned. However, he does not have the right to refuse service based on the personal characteristics of the customer.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

If anything, all of these are arguments against homophobia, not homosexuality. Imagine each of these situations without homophobia. See? No problem.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

True, if only it were that simple though...it would be like asking people not to have any opinion/ suppress it.
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

Can you give examples of when these things have happened? If you are preemptively complaining don't you lose credibility?
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Agree

What, you never took a "pro-homosexuality" class? It's in the common core!
Debate: Is homosexual behavior harmful to society?
Side: Disagree

Hehe, no I never took that.