azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I see your also British (or potentially some other European).1) That "endowed" generalization is scientifically accurate so don't postulate me being racist because of your scientific ignorance.2) You can play dumb with your meaning behind that post but you know what it meant (you even included the " :D ")3) I just LOOOVE how you ignored all my points on "non-bastard & wanted children" and just falsely asserted you aren't racist.4) I love all of this animosity you're displaying as if you are trying to cover up you racial intentions.5) I never asked what you thought of yourself as.--Not much else to say but... You are welcomed to try again (if you can properly address my posts). Buh Bye now :)
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

"1)That "endowed" generalization is scientifically accurate so don't postulate me being racist because of your scientific ignorance." Actually it isn't. There is no positive correlation between ethnicity and "endowment".
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Actually it is. http://www.answers.com/Q/WhydoblackmaleshavebiggerpenisesandmusclesandaregenerallybiggerthanwhiteorAsianetcmales
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Did you seriously just cite an unreferenced "answers.com" "article"? You do realize answers.com regularly contains false information, right?https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/unique-everybody-else/201210/the-pseudoscience-race-differences-in-penis-size That article discusses many of the issues with those who claim such correlation exists.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Did you seriously just cite an unreferenced "answers.com" "article"?xD
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

This is an impartial reference. Notably, it is pointing out those who claimed blacks are bigger have ignored evidence contesting claims within their claims (basically, they just are trying to annul their credibility).I already knew black males on average are typically larger than white and Asian males, moreover you could tell this is inclined to be true based on the average female anatomy in regards to vaginal space differing amongst races. http://racehist.blogspot.com/2008/05/racial-differences-in-vaginal.html I typically would not have used a reference because I have learned this. So I just binged the question and the first thing that came up was answers.com
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/6/1618.full Instead of a random blog, let's go with Oxford :D"Race was not associated with any differences in measurements of vaginal dimensions."
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Just because it says "oxford" does not mean it is entirely true. We can do a "source war" from a bunch of viable sources. But in the end, we all know that race and penis size correlate. You may not like the idea of black males (not all) being superior in the part of the body most women tend to care (sexually) about, but it is what it is. ===Another point undirected to you: I think white males hate black males so much because out of all the (bad) things in life white males are glad to not experience (racial stigmas etc.) the one most wanted thing (most) white males cannot experience is fully satisfying a girl sexually. And those same males have animosity towards the unworthy "niggers" that can. Of course they won't admit to blacks being better than whites in the most wanted areas, but, hey, life goes on. ---to clarify: all natural blacks (super dark) are the ones with bigger penises, not the mixtures--which studies like to include when talking about races rendering their conclusion contentious/dubious.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

"We all know" is not a legitimate argument, harvard. We have all HEARD that is the case, but that does not mean anyone "knows it". Trying to imply insecurity on my part, without even knowing my gender or ethnicity, is pretty lame as well, especially when you are coming at me with a blog and an unreferenced answers.com article.And out of curiosity, have you seen some sort of studies on males ability to sexually satisfy women based on ethnicity, or are you just playing off of racial stereotypes.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

1) I clearly stated "undirected towards you". Kill the straw mans.2) In addition to #1 in regards to your straw man I clearly made my second paragraph n "off the record". It wasn't meant to be an argument but of course with straw men you can deter the crux of my argument to be centered toward an off the record.3) I clearly clarified as to why I used that [answers.com] article. Kill the sophistry.4) I have anecdotal evidence (and anatomical) that women prefer bigger penises. And since black males generally have bigger penises, then vaginal intercourse with a random black male is inclined to be nevertheless satisfactory.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

"You may not like the idea of black males (not all) being superior in the part of the body most women tend to care (sexually) about, but it is what it is."Clearly, huh? That's why you used the words "you may not like"? You may want to look into what a straw man is, harvard.And anecdotal evidence means nothing. Women prefer different things depending on a wide variety of factors, you personal experiences don't change that. And you still haven't provided any legitimate evidence of either high satisfaction from black males, or larger penis size. Just racial stereotypes.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Women prefer different things depending on a wide variety of factors, you personal experiences don't change that.Sexually, as I said (more straw mans), through intercourse, a larger penis provides more pleasure because it gives a woman a "full" feeling, a felling which they enjoy. If you have a larger penis, such a the general black male populous, you can satisfy (al least in one way) fully (pun intended) , through sexual intercourse.I never excluded all other possibilities of satisfying women, I clearly was just speaking on intercourse.You may not like the idea of black males (not all) being superior in the part of the body most women tend to care (sexually) about, but it is what it is.- wasn't the crux of my argument. The point I was trying to get across was that black males on average have larger penises than whites. This could (and does sometimes) cause white males to detest blacks more than they irrationally already do.Come to realize, I also see that I said "part of the body" implying an appendage. So you see how equated general satisfaction of females with black males is a straw man misrepresenting what I said. I never said black males satisfy all factors regarding sex, I only said on average blacks have bigger dicks, women like dicks that can fill them up, blacks have a thing they like, thus providing services containing high likeability (and Latinos but that's another story, a story witch involves Latino cultures enforcing the ability to dance amongst their ethnic groups starting at a young age. And that ability to dance impacts sexual motor skills in a positive manner, that's real anecdotal evidence ;).
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

First, what exactly do you think a straw man is?Second, since the size of the vagina differs between women, the optimal size of the penis for said women will obviously change. For a smaller woman, a larger penis will cause pain, for example. Still waiting for evidence of any positive correlation between ethnicity and penis size, by the way.And while I now recognize the nuance in what you said between psychological vs physiological sexual satisfaction, the failure of recognizing it hardly constitutes a straw man.Regardless, I am more interested in comparing evidence of a statistical trend than I am in forms of arguments.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

And you say this without providing evidence that there isn't? Okay. I provided a source (aside from "answers") which you've disregarded. Of course I cannot show you 3 million black dicks and 3 million white dicks (which you are implicitly suggesting) but I can show you stats from sources. Now you may disregard them all while requesting them (makes sense?) but I guess its a waste of time if you just keep proffering contentious sources that are not even directly refuting what I am saying because even they do not have evidence to provide. So instead they just sit back and say "well you were wrong about this" "and you were wrong about that" instead of actually substantiating the contrary with real evidence.Second, since the size of the vagina differs between women, the optimal size of the penis for said women will obviously change. For a smaller woman, a larger penis will cause pain, for exampleWell done... Like that wasn't obvious. But the truth of the matter is most women have a vagina that accommodates sizes much bigger than 4 inches. I love when people say "a girls vagina is 4in deep so you don't really need that much to please them" while the women are clearly suggesting the contrary. I have never heard a woman claim that she prefers 2-4in penises. I am sure some (albeit extremely rare) do but most will never claim such a thing. Articles say that to make smaller guys feel better about themselves, but women prefer in the middle average penises (as in the average is 5.3-7in and women prefer around the 6-61/2 region. Any lower can still do but they will have to be extremely talented in other areas if they wish to please.And women get used to large penises. Not every woman that can take big guys has always had the ability to do so. And it is when the get used to larger penises is when they like it much more than the smaller ones. (Like virgins when they first have sex, it hurts really bad, but the minute they get used to intercourse it feels extremely better.)
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

You keep claiming you have sources you can cite, and yet you are not citing referenced sources. THAT is my problem with answers.com, it is a notoriously unreliable website and you used it without any material to back it up. Additionally, the source I provided, if you read the whole thing, talks about the problems with the studies that make any claims about ethnic differences in penis size. They talk about WHY there is no evidence for them to provide, because their evidence, like the evidence used in the studies you have cited, would be flawed."Well done... Like that wasn't obvious. But the truth of the matter is most women have a vagina that accommodates sizes much bigger than 4 inches. I love when people say "a girls vagina is 4in deep so you don't really need that much to please them" while the women are clearly suggesting the contrary. I have never heard a woman claim that she prefers 2-4in penises. I am sure some (albeit extremely rare) do but most will never claim such a thing." Ok? Not sure what you are trying to prove there, exactly."Articles say that to make smaller guys feel better about themselves, but women prefer in the middle average penises (as in the average is 5.3-7in and women prefer around the 6-61/2 region. Any lower can still do but they will have to be extremely talented in other areas if they wish to please." And yet you claimed that women prefer larger penises, not ones that accommodate the average length of the vagina."And women get used to large penises. Not every woman that can take big guys has always had the ability to do so. And it is when the get used to larger penises is when they like it much more than the smaller ones. (Like virgins when they first have sex, it hurts really bad, but the minute they get used to intercourse it feels extremely better.)" Are you implying that the vaginal lining stretches over time? If so, I've got some sources for you :P
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

another straw man.I gave you TWO sources after I clarified why I used "answers". Yet you are constantly regressing back to answers.com as if that is the only source I provided. reread those two paragraphs to get the point.Are you implying that the vaginal lining stretches over time? If so, I've got some sources for you :have you head the phrase "no walls"? As in, the vagina feels looser for a smaller guy from being penetrated (regularly) by a much bigger guy.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

have you head the phrase "no walls"? As in, the vagina feels looser for a smaller guy from being penetrated (regularly) by a much bigger guy.A little more to it than that.It's not just being penetrated regularly by a bigger guy, but relatively recently. It does not take a long dry spell for the lining to return to (close to) their original dimensions, barring severe trauma (childbirth, prolonged intercourse with a very large member with insufficient lubrication, etc).It's also indicative of a foreplay failure on the guys part. A womans anatomy is very responsive. A woman who is too tight is typically loosened up somewhat during foreplay by inserting an increasing number of fingers; she gradually stretches to accomodate these without having to stretch all at once to accomodate the penis painfully. This can work in reverse as well, in a sense; stimulating the vagina with a small object (say, two fingers, one finger, etc) will encourage the tissue to expand somewhat; this type of foreplay makes her very tight on entry, almost regardless of her past experiences.And of course, a woman's own practices have an effect as well; a woman who does kegels (or similar excercises regularly) will have a firmer, tighter, and more flexible fit.Of all these factors, I can tell you with certainty that foreplay is the foremost of these, and any guy with a current partner can observe the effect I've mentioned with their current partner. If your partner is willing to try kegels, you can observe the effect that those have directly as well. As far as the 'recently' bit goes, well... you'd need to find a girl already used to someone larger than you and remain exclusive with her for a good while to test this, but it should be doable in theory. For me, it was noticing the changes in an on-and-off relationship I had with a girl over the course of years, with different partners in between for both of us.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Again, you are not using the term "straw man" correctly.You gave one non-source, and a blog that I refuted using a more reliable source.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I was going to address most if not all of your post, but you seem to be too much of a cunt to see past your irrationality. I will not reply to anymore of your posts due to the reason I have given. My last statement to you is GTFO and KYS.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Since when did serial killers have anything to do with the nature of this debate? We were discussing how much money an illegitimate, bastard child who was accidentally conceived by people who can't support it themselves would cost the state. Not the likelihood of a child born out of wedlock turning out to be a murder, pedophile, rapist compared to one born in wedlock. You've really gone way beyond the point.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

You are speaking about yourself of course. The world would be a better place without you correct? The self love and arrogance of pro choice loonies is beyond rational. The utter inhumanity of any people to sacrifice others for their own sake is beyond hideous.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Uh oh. You're being mean. The majical sky daddy is definitely angry with you for saying that.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

The world would be a better place without you correct? Maybe, maybe not. I know it would definitely be a better place without you. KYS? :DThe self love and arrogance of pro choice loonies is beyond rational.Depends on your perspective. I feel the same way about pro-life loonies such as yourself. The utter inhumanity of any people to sacrifice others for their own sake is beyond hideous.That's how the world tends to work; deal with it.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Hate on prochoice people all you like the fact is a fetus has no right to live. If you live of another persons body, like a parasite, then that person has every right to remove the parasite if they want to. Furthermore this is considering the most fetuses do not have minds so cannot even be considered alive more than any other insentient organism such as a jellyfish or a plant.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Talk about parasites! The Left is made up of parasites living off Government. You total hypocrite. Is your answer to kill all the parasites on the Left? These parasites also have no minds to think with. They think between their legs and social services locations.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Don't just assume I am left-wing just because I support the abortion. I am actually very right wing. I hate the leftie shirkers who live off the dole while the hardworking middle class support them. We shouldn't kill the left wing people who live off the state just remove their benefits or "welfare" or "social security" or whatever you call it in the US and make them stand on their own two feet.The existence of these left-wing parasites is a reason to support abortion because an unwanted child is likely to become a parasite who lives off the state.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Listen, I'm glad you are not a mindless Liberal who supports the insanity of easy welfare for able bodied people. What you need to understand is that killing our most innocent children is NOT THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM. You must be God to know what the future would bring for a Baby aborted. Do you have clue how many great people came form poverty? Many affluent mothers who can easily support their children have abortions. What you re saying is a pathetic excuse to allow the inhumanity to continue. A very selfish mindset. Are you glad your mother did not think that way with you?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

killing our most innocent childrenIt is no different to killing pond-life. The early stage fetus can't think. It is not sentient, it has no mind.You must be God to know what the future would bring for a Baby abortedYou believe that all aborted children go to heaven. If this is true then women are doing them a favor my aborting them. Do you have clue how many great people came form povertyThere is a great difference between coming from poverty and coming from an arsehole family who chose a slovenly, lazy life. There are some kids my age that have never had a parent in work. With an example like that to follow there is no way for them to go far in life. Lets say we have a young child named something like "Charmaine", whose parents detest the idea of working and are on benefits Whose parents conceived her accidentally, before their time and never wanted a kid. Who live in a rundown flat in a dodgy area. Whose school if full of the vile, misbehaved offspring of the underclass where over two in three of the kids there fail their GCSEs (or high-school diploma or whatever the US equivalent is). Is it really likely that, in these conditions, Charmaine will get anywhere in life at all? I'm going to say that in all likelihood Charmaine will just be another benefits scrounger like the rest of lower-class people.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

While there are many out there who will say "I don't want to pay for someone else's sex", the reality is that free birth control would not only pay for itself, but would over all save the country money. It would decrease the number of unwanted pregnancies, which would help cut the costs to our social safety net. It would also decrease crime rates, as unwanted or unexpected children in lower income areas quite often coincide with increased crime rates (for reasons that should be rather clear).
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Do you honestly think the cost of a condom prevents people from using birth control?I have bridge to sell you.It's called irresponsibility that creates unwanted Babies. Learn please!
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Can you lead to anytime I said the cost of condoms prevents people from using birth control?Condoms aren't the issue when it comes to free birth control. And yes, humans are irresponsible. Always have been, always will be. So why not try to help fix the ISSUE, instead of railing against human nature?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Your clear reference was to free birth control leading to fewer unwanted births. the reality is that free birth control would not only pay for itself, but would over all save the country money. It would decrease the number of unwanted pregnancies.Condoms aren't the issue when it comes to free birth control. The cost of birth control can't be an issue condoms are already dispensed for free in our schools.So why not try to help fix the ISSUE. Hmmmm lets see, condons aren't the issue, free condoms are already available ----------- What was that issue we gota fix again.It would also decrease crime rates, as unwanted or unexpected children in lower income areas quite often coincide with increased crime rates (for reasons that should be rather clearMaybe it should be rather clear, but its not.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Again, CONDOMS aren't the issue when it comes to free birth control, generally speaking the pill is.And are you saying it isn't clear why an increase in unwanted and unsupported children contributes dramatically to an increase in crime in lower income areas?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

At £1 a pop?I don't know how much they are in the US, though, and the UK is the place where they are the most expensive (although you can get them for free at various places).
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I know this is a different debate from a woman having the right but...I believe she has a right, so...It should be free to be fair to women who can't afford it. It should be allowed, therefore, it should be allowed fairly.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

I believe she has a right, so...It should be free to be fair to women who can't afford itDo you see that using this logic also leads to other ridiculous "should be's" like:Since I can control my own body I should be able to get free face lifts, or free tummy tucks, or free sex change surgery. NONE of these are rights that we should be given for free.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I agree that they are not rights, but look at it pragmatically Daver: Would you rather pay for women to get the pill, or would you rather pay (directly or indirectly) for the consequences of these unwanted children? One way or another (be it social services, law enforcement, societal cost from crime, etc) you will pay for it, but the amount you pay will differ depending on how proactive you'd like to be.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

IMO the government need not be in the business of paying for contraception, nor a baby born to someone who can't / won't care for it. Safety nets are needed, but support nets for people making poor choices are not in the purview of government.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Before I address what you just said, let me clarify something: Would you take out the safety net for lower income families in certain circumstances?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Would you rather pay for the deaths of families in their homes when not allowed to have guns for protection and are killed by intruders? If they could not afford guns should Government pay for the guns for their own self protection? Do you people EVER get some semblance of awareness of the ludicrous arguments you make when it comes to things you want paid for by Government? When it comes to things you don't like, you always find an excuse why it should not be covered. It is truly boring bantering words with such one sided hypocrites.