azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

What is your reasoning that allows you to believe all these conspiracies? Which ones exactly dont you believe?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Which ones exactly dont you believe?All of the ones you had stated.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Then you're an idiot and I am not going to waste my time with you. The USA government has admitted to some of those.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Then you're an idiot and I am not going to waste my time with you. The USA government has admitted to some of those.Incorrect, the government has not admitted to any of them.The Media, etc only tries to twist the governments words and make it look like they are saying things that they aren't saying.You're the idiot.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

They actually have, by their own words and through freedom of information act requests.Not going to bother sending you links, since you have already demonstrated that evidence holds zero importance or legitimacy to you if it contradicts preconceptions. Please let me know if that has changed and I'll give you some proof.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

They actually have, by their own words and through freedom of information act requests.Not going to bother sending you links, since you have already demonstrated that evidence holds zero importance or legitimacy to you if it contradicts preconceptions. Please let me know if that has changed and I'll give you some proof.You've failed already.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

At what, exactly?Realizing the futility in talking to someone who doesn't accept evidence disprove preconceptions?Because if so, you may be right.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

At what, exactly?Realizing the futility in talking to someone who doesn't accept evidence disprove preconceptions?Because if so, you may be right.I'm not interested in what you believe is futile, Jeremy Kyle.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Listen to IAmSparticus he has patience for people like you. I dont. I am not going to find the facts for you. The government have admitted most of those. Look it up for yourself and stop being so lazy.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

You have only just started communicating with me.What right do you have to make an assertion about a poster that you don't actually know of yet.If we are sitting down having a debate, it isn't my place to look up facts to help prove your own assertion.If you are making a position yourself, it is up to you to find facts to back up your own assertion.It is my place to find facts that back up my own claims, but it isn't my place to find facts that back up your claims.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Normally I agree, but you haven't adhere to these guidelines yourself in past conversations, so by what authority do you hold him to them?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Normally I agree, but you haven't adhere to these guidelines yourself in past conversations, so by what authority do you hold him to them?I always adhere to the guidelines.I show the most noblest of faces when talking to my friends on createdebate.You are still my friend.I show the upmost pride in myself.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

You have a history of refusing to look up the evidence and the facts to back up your assertions, I can even provide quotes if you would like.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

At what, exactly?Realizing the futility in talking to someone who doesn't accept evidence disprove preconceptions?Because if so, you may be right.My choice if I want to use other websites as references.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Saying that the government have never admitted it is like denying that oxygen is in the air. I didn't realise you were so stupid when I started the convo. I made a mistake.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Saying that the government have never admitted it is like denying that oxygen is in the air. I didn't realise you were so stupid when I started the convo. I made a mistake.Of course oxygen is in the air.Proof that the government has said that they have admitted to these crimes though. I'm not sure that the government has admitted that oxygen is in the air, either.I'm not interested in that though.I'm not interested in stupidity.What I actually am interested is evidence that the government has admitted to any of these things.Leave stupidity to Dr Hydroxide Pinkhead.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Let's stick with just MKULTRA for a start and work from there.Now, go here, and ignore the actual article itself if you wish, and head straight to the citations. In it many freedom of information act requested documents are linked that demonstrate it happened.If you recognize that we can move onto another one.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Let's stick with just MKULTRA for a start and work from there.Now, go here, and ignore the actual article itself if you wish, and head straight to the citations. In it many freedom of information act requested documents are linked that demonstrate it happened.If you recognize that we can move onto another one.MKULTRA was intended to be used against prisoners of war and against certain targets. The weapon of mental control regarding these weapons was done to be put to a just purpose.They tested their experiments for these mind control weapons on mental patients, in other words, on people who had low I'Qs, or people who were evil murderers who ended up in mental wards.Nothing wrong with nasty mental experiments on people with low IQs or weird mentally ill murderous locked away guilty of murder!It's an innocent action and expressed through healthy means!
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

The NASA has every right to intercept our phone calls.NASA is the national space agency.They have neither the mandate nor the purpose of intercepting phone calls.The NSA on the other hand...And no. Nobody has any right to listen to what I say to somebody privately, either over the telephone or over the internet or in person. That doesn't mean they don't: simply that it is wrong, no matter what way you look at it.There is no evidence to suggest that MKULTRA really caused any harm.The accounts I've read by people who were tested upon would strongly, vehemently disagree with you there. Try this video of testimony by a psychiatrist. Or this.allowed the government gain the control it needed over society.The government needs control like I need a Gutenberg Bible.It might be fun to have, but having it will only damage it.Society needs controlling.The government needs to be controlled so as to prevent such blatant abuses.There is little evidence that people were injected with plutoniumThere is plentynor that the plutonium given was actually a cause of any harm"Plutonium was recognized as potentially dangerous even when the total amount of Pu in existence was only a few milligrams. " - HereThere is little evidence that alcohol was actually added with "poison", or that people were actually damaged by this so called "poison".Time disagrees with you, no surprise there.Reiterating ideas without including ones own spin on things is the epitome of stupidity.You, my dear idiot, are the epitome of stupidity.Why do I get the feeling that an American politician could shoot every member of your family to death and you'd still vote for them? After all, they must've had a great reason.Do you have any reason to believe the conspiracy theories you do?I don't believe in any conspiracy theories. I believe in the facts.You haven't provided me with any reasoning for them.Thus I have taken it upon myself to do so.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

You might not think so once the "death panels" arrive. Now that they're in the healthcare business, the government's going to need to find ways to pay for it and reduce costs. I've worked for a couple large hospitals in my State and have heard things. The best advice I can give is to stay as healthy as you possibly can.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Death Panels have existed since the creation of the Health Insurance Industry.They aren't new in any way, shape, or form.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

In what form have death panels existed "since the creation of the health insurance industry"?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Panels within Health Care companies that determine whether individuals under their coverage get life saving care or not. This is not new, and is pretty integral to the incredibly messed up health insurance system in this country.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

In what ways do you believe the government tries to kill people?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Where did I say that the govt is trying to kill people? What I said was they shouldn't have that power.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

You mentioned the "death panels".A method of killing people, by drawing them into ill health and death.The government should have the power to kill murderers.Especially when it is up to forensics, judge and jury to decide, as well as psychologists who are experts in psychopathology.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

I am sorry, but the people in government only care about the people in government. The government does not have our best motives at heart.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

How does the government only care about the people in the government?I would you to at least put forth one argument that proves it.You don't have to source anything, just put up one argument.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Why do you act like I can't back up what I said? Leland Yee is the perfect example. He was a staunch anti gun advocate in California. It turns out he was selling missiles when he wasn't working in the government.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

All I am claiming for is a good argument to back up ones claim. Nothing more, nothing less. Let's keep things simple and hopefully you can sort out your differences. No big deal, ok?Leland Yee was a traitor, he should not have been considered a true member of the government. He neither had the Governments or the peoples best interests at heart whatsoever. A traitor shouldn't be regarded as a member.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

No true Scotsman fallacy. Thanking you for proving every bad word I have said about you was justified. Why is it that you want good arguments, but you never provide any?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

The majority of people in the government tend to have our best interests at heart, not all of them, but most of them.Just like people in general tend to be empathetic and kind, but not all of them.(which has been made quite clear, I'm sure).The role of being in the government is to do ones job, anybody who belongs to the government and acts against the will of the people isn't doing their job properly.Someone in the government with only bad intentions is like a fireman who doesn't put out fires.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

If they are acting in our best interest why have they not held a vote to raise the minimum wage, but they hold votes all the time to raise their own pay?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

The thing is, if the government tries to raise the minimum wage, it could cause massive damage to so many other people.It might benefit a lot of people, but it could also could be a major detriment to people of all economic classes as well.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

The thing is, the people in the government promised to raise the minimum wage to get elected. They would have had to lie to get elected.How does raising their own pay help me or you?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Which people in the government have asked for a pay rise. You need to be specific.I am unable to debate with you unless you happen to be specific.Secondly, the government has indeed promised to raise the minimum wage, they haven't yet broken the promise, they just haven't been able to carry out the promise yet. Just because it didn't happen straight away doesn't mean they haven't followed through with the promise.And in my country at least, the minimum wage has gone up every year.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

All of them vote for pay increase all the time. It isn't one specific case.Why does everyone else have to be specific and you are allowed to avoid the topic and lie?Your country raising the minimum wage every year just proves that my country not raising minimum wage is then not caring about the people.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

All of them vote for pay increase all the time. It isn't one specific case.Never use the word "all" when talking about everybody, there is such as thing as "majority", but there is no such thing as "all" when talking about such a huge crowd of people.There are thousands of politicians. Just a side note.To get to that point, I feel that we are unable to judge whether it is right for politicians to get a pay rise. If a politician is of a higher ranking, being a politician can be an expensive job that requires an higher wage, if a politician is of a lower ranking then they are not always paid much money. Low ranking political positions aren't really all that well paid.Why does everyone else have to be specific and you are allowed to avoid the topic and lie?I'll ignore this attempt at a smear, if this is what you mean be "avoiding".Your country raising the minimum wage every year just proves that my country not raising minimum wage is then not caring about the people.I live in Britain, I assume you live in America.The thing is, in Britain the minimum wage does go up per year, which does at least prove that their are some honest governments out their in the world. We may not be talking about the USA, but at least Britain has a fair government.And the thing is, Britain is a smaller country, so it is much easier to rise the minimum wage in that country, but America is a lot larger, so it is more difficult for politicians to efficiently raise the minimum wage.Just a guess, I hope I'm being nice and obvious for you.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

It isn't a smear. You avoid everything.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

"It isn't a smear. You avoid everything."Point proven.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

So, you finally agree that I haven't been smearing you. I am glad you have come around.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

It is YOU who has claimed to not smear me.Claiming that I "avoid everything" is a smear in itself, it has no basis.Now lets actually get back to what we were discussing.We were talking about whether the government is to be trusted with the death penalty and whether the government has our best interests at heart.Are you going to go back to that discussion?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

It is YOU who has claimed to not smear me.And, you agreed.Claiming that I "avoid everything" is a smear in itself, it has no basis.It is based on you avoiding everything. So, since it is true, it isn't a smear.Now lets actually get back to what we were discussing.So, admitting that you derailed us.We were talking about whether the government is to be trusted with the death penalty and whether the government has our best interests at heart.And, you have avoided providing any evidence that the government cares about the people.Are you going to go back to that discussion?Waiting on you.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

And, you agreedSince when?It is based on you avoiding everything. So, since it is true, it isn't a smear.Since when? Yet again you try to smear me.So, admitting that you derailed us.It wasn't me who derailed the discussion. Why haven't you refuted any of my very last arguments on my opinion on why I believe the government isn't able to raise the minimum wage?And, you have avoided providing any evidence that the government cares about the people.It wasn't me who derailed the discussion. Why haven't you refuted any of my very last arguments on my opinion on why I believe the government isn't able to raise the minimum wage?Waiting on you.I have provided an argument which you had ignored to do with the minimum wage. Haven't you bothered to read the post I had made?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Since when?A couple posts ago.Since when? Yet again you try to smear me.16 days and counting.It wasn't me who derailed the discussion. Why haven't you refuted any of my very last arguments on my opinion on why I believe the government isn't able to raise the minimum wage?Because you don't actually believe that the government can't raise minimum wage. You provided evidence that contradicts your claim that the government can't raise minimum wage. Because your idea of refuting my argument is to just claim that a member of the government is not a true member of the government.I have provided an argument which you had ignored to do with the minimum wage. Haven't you bothered to read the post I had made?Which argument should I read? The one where you said it is ok for the government to not raise the minimum wage, or the one where you said it is good when they do.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

A couple posts ago.I'm not interested if that is your only reply.16 days and countingI'm not interested in this talk.Because you don't actually believe that the government can't raise minimum wage. You provided evidence that contradicts your claim that the government can't raise minimum wage. Because your idea of refuting my argument is to just claim that a member of the government is not a true member of the government.*How have I contradicted my claims? I am claiming that anybody who is part of the government yet happens to counter the soul purpose of aiding it's citizens is counter to the purpose of the government and really doing their job. Of course the government has made efforts to raise the minimum wage, it just struggles to, it doesn't mean that the government doesn't try to help raise the minimum wage, it means they just haven't managed to yet.The one where you said it is ok for the government to not raise the minimum wage, or the one where you said it is good when they do.There are two sides to the government, one side that believes it is best to raise the minimum wage and the other who believes it is best to leave it as it is.Those who don't do so because they see fit. Those who do want to raise it simply haven't seen the minimum wage go up because they have been unable to raise it. They both want to do what they see is best, they just haven't been able to do it yet.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

I completely agree with this. I think I laughed a little when I read the government have our 'best interests at heart.'
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

What do you call armed police then? This is poorly phrased.And it isn't the government who makes this call. It's prosecutors!
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Who work for the government, by the way.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

Whether or not they deserve it, we shouldn't kill people unless its completely necessary. Period. If a person is in custody then there is no immediate reason to kill them, therefore we should not.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

What negative consequences would arise if a guilty person would die?No harm would be done, would it not?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

The harm done would be that a person that didn't need to die did, justice doesn't work out of cold blood.Additionally, that isn't justification to kill, so don't act as if it is. That kind of logic can be used to justify plenty of terrible things. The idea that you should kill a person because no negative consequences come out of the killing is incredulous and doesn't make you any better than those on death row, if anything it makes you worse.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

What about if somebody committed murder?That wouldn't be acceptable, would it?
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

No it isn't acceptable. But one person killing someone isn't justification to kill any more, best to just keep the amount of deaths to a minimum. If a person is in custody and kept in prison their entire life then they won't hurt anyone else, there is no point to killing them. Killing is wrong no matter who is doing the killing and who is the victim, and as said earlier, the justice system doesn't work out of cold blood.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

People who actually commit murder are worthless people.You can't consider someone as heinous as Ted Bundy as being a person.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I oppose it

I would completely agree that Ted Bundy is a heinous person, but to say that you can't consider him a person is ridiculous. People aren't inherently good, you can be a bad person and still be considered a person.But the quality of a person, again, isn't justification to kill them. For the third time, justice doesn't work out of cold blood. Your entire argument goes in with the assumption that it does.
Debate: Do You Support or Oppose the Death Penalty?
Side: I Support it

Ted Bundy is an evil sociopath.A sociopath is unable to experience fear, shock, regret, sadness, joy. remorse, empathy or sympathy. I sociopath is incapable of finding any meaning or joy while looking at the most beautiful paintings or watching the sunset. They are incapable of finding any joy in holding a first-born baby in their hands for the first time. They do not fear for the lives of anybody, they aren't even afraid to lose their own lives, they do not care whether they live or do, they are incapable of fear. They have such a disconnection to truth. They do not have any emotions so they are unable to feel any connection to what is true, they are compulsive liars and lie simply because they can. They lie about everything big and small, they have lied their whole lives, they are so dead and void, they just don't care about the truth, look at Ted Bundy's mugshot and look at his eyes, you can see the deadness inside of him right there.