azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Israel is the mother of the church .When Jesus told John to honor and watch over His mother, and to His mother behold your son.John was a prophetic word picture of the church.We are to honor her as our motherand listen to her as our parent in the Lord so we may live long in the land.1000 year millenial reign of Christ Yushua the Messiah
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Information Revelation talking lightGiving understanding at the speed of lightThis is how I hear God, and how others "hear God"
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Which words have been given you by religions that tell the whole story. And it actually has evidence piled to Heaven, which regardless if you admit it has been shown and proven. And it all is consistent and makes sense beginning to end.You may want to have an open mind so your eyes are opened before the door is shut!
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

It has been estimated that since 1973 Black women have had about 16 million abortions. Michael Novak had calculated "Since the number of current living Blacks (in the U.S.) is 36 million, the missing 16 million represents an enormous loss, for without abortion, America's Black community would now number 52 million persons. It would be 36 percent larger than it is. Abortion has swept through the Black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member."Is this the Margret Sanger dream ?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

I dont talk to chat bots sorry. Try http://www.personalityforge.com/
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

The rapture is almost a logical impossibility. So, it can't happen. The old administrators must have expected this religion to have gone extinct by now, thus they made such prediction. Funny that even Hinduism and Buddhism predict the same thing. Ancient Hindus went far enough to say that it happens periodically - the next time of it happening, when God will come and 'destroy the sinners, protect the religious (and have them flourish)', is just over 427,000 years away.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Well it will and you can be logically left here! You dont know Him you are of this dieing world. God news He can show you and save you. If it were true, when would you want to know?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

It can't. No deity is coming. Because none can come. As I said, it is an impossibility.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Then I guess there is no need for you to discuss further.Faith is a choice. I feel my faith is solid on a body of evidence I couldnt reasonably deny even if I didnt have faith. But you dont.So go to a discussion that isnt about faith. If nothing Ive shown you convinces you that it is at least compelling and worth the investigation, then go discuss something you have more to converse about, beyond no it aint, and yes it is. I refer you to debates more on your interest level, perhaps youd enjoy one about what color car you like best, or who is cooler batman or robin?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Reason is a slave of passions, just as it ought to be. So, I doubt there can be agreement between us on the topic. But you can wait, and then you will know that the rapture can't happen, as it won't.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

You cant prove there is no God. And God says there will be a rapture. I like the idea of His Kingdom reigning in the place of this worlds systems. His Kingdom principles would put an end to violence and hate and all the worlds evils. If you want to embrace evil, and be hopeless, that is your choice.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

You can't prove anything. So what? Is there any prediction to exactly when the rapture will happen? Judging from so many failed guesses, I don't think so. If there were, there would be something more concrete for me rather than seeing postpones till we're just radiation.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Thats pretty hypocritical, everything offers failures and successes. So you judge information by past and never learn from it for future accuracey? Like in science or in personal struggles.Or do you evaluate everything and refine a hypothesis as more information becomes available.We have almost the whole puzzle together now, so its very clear.God isnt as mysterious as peopke assume. He makes things very clear at the appointed time. But to the wicked it is not made clear. He doesnt hear the wicked, he is against the wicked.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Yes, I can make theories on the go if it failing any number of times is not an indicator of whether it will succeed or not.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Actually the rapture is what Jesus spoke of day or hour unknown. Most prophesies have a trigger event. The rapture doesnt have a trigger event. It has a completion appointment. And it has a prior to, appointment. The evaluation of Rapture can be at any time prior to wrath ...Which is the final 3.5 years. We have every indication that is on the horizon by the Bible and all the current events.There are 21 judgments starting with the seals and the horses.As we interpret we see these things becoming clearer and in a line. So in times past, there were scattered pieces that resembled and some of the old guys got it closer than others.But it really wasnt for them, other than awareness and anticipation. But now its like we are the most dense and He is speaking the loudest. So everything is lining up like dominoes. It makes sense for the actual time to be the most clear since we have to follow instructions and be aware the most because we are in it.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

So that means you can conveniently postpone it to eternity. It won't happen, and you could see it if any time limit was present.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

No we are entering the last 7 years now .........................
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

That's about the time I'll be preparing for the next wave of attacks on religions. So, that can probably be about the last time limit. I don't expect the tools to stand for much longer with anyone worth representing them against the competition.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Isnt Hindu the religion they think the world is carried by elephants on turtles backs.At least the Bible is honest He hangs it on nothing!One is accurate the other is not!
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

I don't remember seeing any such claim. But it might be, after all, it is a religion at least 5000 years old. The vedas were compiled around 3500 years ago, before which they were passed down orally. Still, I doubt it would say any such thing. Even if it did, though, most world religions so far have failed to surpass it, because it isn't based on dogma and around administrative purposes.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

The Great Turtle myth was first brought to the public’s attention in the 17th century, after a man named Jasper Danckaerts learned of it from several tribes of Native Americans he encountered. The Native Americans, however, are not the only ones who believed that the world rested on the shell of a giant turtle, as the myth is also prevalent in Chinese and Indian culture.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Yes, I've seen the tool that represents our turtle. It might be a belief - there was no universal law of gravitation with them to justify observations. I've never really inquired about its use - the answer I got as a child was some 'lucky charm' spin. At least they knew that the earth moved at all (and that it isn't entirely flat). Which means that they were astronomically advanced enough to deduce it. Rather than arguing how the angels flap their wings in space, if you really have to bring ancient astronomical knowledge in debate.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

The Bible actually tells the earth is a sphere hung on nothing.The Bible is accurate, no turtlesIsaiah 40He sits on top of the CIRCLE of the earth, LOOKING DOWN at men looking like grasshoppers isThis is a circle, as in our world. It is hung in the sky, And God is sitting on top looking down, NOT at a flat plain circle. If it were flat, even a flat circle then how would GOD then sit on top, and see all of the contents of the world before Him?Job 26:7“He stretches out the north over empty space And hangs the earth on nothing.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

That's attributing meaning by yourself. Doesn't seem like you know about psychology enough to claim that. I have, as a set of subjects, people who weren't aware of the earth being spherical, and had read the book. Take things before Renaissance in Christian countries.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Oh i thought it was basic reading skills. Move on I have no further interest in speaking with those who hate reason and logic. If you are not called by truth, and you dont respond to truth, I suspect you are likely not a child of truth.John 10:3To him the doorkeeper opens, and the sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out..His voice is the word and His Spirit, which you hear neither regardless of reasoning.Isaiah 1:18[ “Let Us Reason” ] “Come now, and let us reason together,” Says the Lord, “Though your sins are as scarlet, They will be as white as snow; Though they are red like crimson, They will be like wool.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

John 10:3To him the doorkeeper opens, and the sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.John 10:8All who came before Me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them.John 10:16I have other sheep, which are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will hear My voice; and they will become one flock with one shepherd.John 10:27My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me;.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

The sheep reference has already been explicit by your words. You say I hate reason and logic? It is you who is randomly attributing meanings to things and thinking that someday a shepherd will lead you directly. But I don't give something so much of benefit of doubt. That's simply absurd. And following sheep mindlessly waiting to probably some day see a shepherd is already not one of my greatest skills.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Don't you think I could use a similar format for the religious dogmatists? I understand how logic and arguments work. You are trying to hide implications in long texts. Basically, you just said that "All atheists are evil idiots." Is there anything that isn't so much based on dogma and would not clearly benefit by saying such a thing, that you can use to deduce that?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

You sre correct God calls them evil.Move on! God has measured it and it is nothing but death. Dont believe me? Open your eyes and see the world as light and salt are rejected. Move on! Be a fool. Its your choice. Not mine!
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

The Bible doesnt attribute things like wind to flapping wings.The Bible is much more scientific than that. Your unaware. I am aware, I study it to see if these things are so. And its really more advanced than science. Even in basic terms it explains science without a lab and microscope or telescope. It describes the properies of light and even time travel. It describes precipitation and psychology and more.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

"he" doesn't exist, so no! I don't know him :)
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Are you reasonable when weighing evidence? If coincidences add up impossible odds, are you the type to ignore that or do you weigh evidence with reasonable just weights put on to the evidence according to its merit in improbability?So far Ive found many people put irrationally low levels of merit on evidence that should weigh heavy.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

The odds are low no matter which side you choose :)
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

By that rationale anything goes and criminal justice and civil legal systems are intrinsically indefensible. Because it's all just our CHOICE and that's apparently a right that supersedes all other rights automatically. It isn't enough to say that we have a right to choice in a case of conflicting rights; you have to explain why a right to choose should supersede in this case.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Just ask the black population. Margret Sanger would be proud and defend their right to eliminate their own population.According to the CDC, between 2007 and 2010, innocent black babies were victimized in nearly 36 percent of the abortion deaths in the United States, though blacks represent only 12.8 percent of the population. Some say the abortion capital of America is New York City.Jan 21, 2015On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

I am not sure what you insinuating... Abortion was intended for the elimination of the black population? Margret Sanger may have been racist but that seems a bit far fetched.Or, are you saying people have abortions because they are black? Why are you particularly pointing out the abortion rate of the black population?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Yes, abortion is a human right. No mother or family should be forced to bring a life into this world, and spend time and money to feed and care for it.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

No one should be forced to die for the convenience of another!Evil hearts and minds will be judged by the Lord of the Living
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

The prevision to the declaration of Human rights acknowledgement of abortion must pivot on the understanding that abortion is a confession being made publicly to a crime.Abortion, a woman who is having a pregnancy aborted is describing officially stopping human life. The right to confess has legal obligations already attached to it.The understanding is a description like Gender Specific Amputation is not making the same incriminating statement.Corpus delicti - used to describe the evidence that proves that a crime has been committed (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/corpus+delicti) The term “confession” means any confession of guilt of any criminal offence or any self-incriminating statement made or given orally or in writing. (www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3501) Two key points we are asked to weight, rape has a statute of limitation while the act of murder does not.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Minors - I don't think that abortion should be a right. Abortion is most common starting from 15 years old. As you would know in the US and many other countries sex isn't legal to you are 18, give or take a couple years due to different countries laws. Why should we give people a right to something that legally shouldn't happen. Unless there is a 100% legal way to impregnate a minor then sorry I'm wrong. Adults - I see consent pop up every on social media, news etc. Consent is everywhere and it's true, consent is everything. But, if you were able to consent to having sex then it is in your hands to make sure proper precautions are in place. And look, I know there are other situations where in-time precautions aren't the problem such as wanting to have a baby then you break up, you decide you want a baby then you don't but that is part of consent. Do you have a secure enough relationship to have a baby? Are you 100% sure that you will still want a baby 1 month in the future. These are all precautions that are really, really important and needed to be debated about. Not wanting a baby after you've decided you did is 100% the two people involved's fault. Therefore it shouldn't be a right.Morals - Is also comes down to your morals as a person and what the majority of the world thinks. To create a right I think that majority of the world or the US would need to agree with that right before it is put into place.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Why should we give people a right to something that legally shouldn't happen.Are you saying that because they shouldn't get pregnant in the first place... then what? I didn't catch whether you think they should get an abortion or not.In our previous debate I suggested rewriting the Declaration of Human Rights - you replied with ''the declaration is fine''Do you think a declaration that poses abortion as a human right is something you can support?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Murder is murder regardlesd of the reason, right?Getting pregnant or not getting pregnant doesnt change that any more than murdering someone because you feel bad that day.Feeling bad is obviously not an excuse to murder. Im sorry they got pregnant before they were ready. Then 9 months and give up for adoption.And if you want to use the foolish excuse babies would be too many, 1st alot of people want to adopt, 2 many people would be more carefull if tbey did not have a crutch, injections every 3 months, sex is a risk. What does a risk have to do with murder, what does inconvenience or not wanting to poisen body with birth control make? Use condom then! And thats crap too, since the market is putting all kinds of crap in them from Monsters to drugs, to junk food!And as far as filling orphanages, if this is your lame evil excuse, then I guess you can decide up to 2 years old who lives and dies, are they worth keeping in the orphanage since children 2 or older are more difficult to place?God will judge their blood on all those who perpetrate, and also on people who by mouth or by post give hearty approval of these murders.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

What are you disputing? I never said whether I was for or against abortion
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Because they legally shouldn't be getting pregnant then they shouldn't need an abortion. If you are a minor it is ILLEGAL for you to get to a abortion stage in the first place.No I don't think that's something I will support.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

a minor is also partially immune to the law, we dont hold them accountable for much, they dont recieve jail time or fines. I do realize that not all countries are alike in that matter, but my point is that given that abortion is legal, it would be called a punishment if the minor wasnt offered one simply because he broke a completely different law. I dont think its common either to take certain rights away as punishment, except when facing jailtime of course.I think its an upside down logic, whether the situation is legal or not you're in a problem that you need to deal with.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

I understand that they don't get charged for much but does that make it right? Just because a minor doesn't get charged often that doesn't make it okay to break that law?If they were to abide by the law they wouldn't have that problem to deal with.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

No it wouldnt be a problem, but they do break the law and we deal with it as we see fit. We dont live in a perfect world where people, including minors, dont commit crime.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Exactly, not allowing abortion would deteriorate those rules being broken. Would it not?
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

Statistics don't show increases in teen pregnancies where abortion is legal internationally. But if you look at the states in the US the states with the strictest abortion laws are also the one's with the highest teen pregnancy rates :)These are wikipedia sites as well, I'm not sure how reliable they are. But interesting for sure. The first link shows a list with abortion rates by state, and the second shows US teen pregnancy rate by state as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AbortionintheUnitedStatesbystatehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeenagepregnancyintheUnited_States
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: No, abortion is not a right

Please try and find something not on wikipedia i never trust that crap.
Debate: Should the Declaration of Human Rights acknowledge abortion as a right?
Side: Abortion is a human right

A good rule of thumb is to check the sources :)