Debate: Socialism vs. Capitalism
Side: Capitalism

This is from bias.Liberty is the ability to for individuals to have control of their choices. Economics wise, if you are told who to pay for what good or service, you don't have economic liberty. That's not bias.Bias.What would be the point to choose if all health care is concentrated under one leadership who ensures best quality of service for anyone in need?What says that it will ensure the best quality of care? In a free market if you health care provider is bad, you go to a new one, if the government health care is bad and there are no other options then you're shit out of luck, you still have to pay for it even if you don't wish to use it.Like paying taxes but you don't have a say where that money goes? Oh, you are talking about present system. But seriously, biased again.It is not bias, you have to pay taxes, there are many projects and programs that people don't agree with and might even find offensive or downright immoral, however, since there is a gun to their head they have to pay. In socialism you don't pick and choose which projects and programs you support you are still forced to fund them. Voluntarily agreeing? Not at all, if they do not have a job they do not have money, if they do not have money they starve to death or start begging for help.Voluntary. When the man says "hey, you can do this job and I'll give you this money" they have the option to voluntarily say yes or no, it is their choice. When the man says "give me your money or I'll shoot" that is not voluntary, that is force and threat.They do not agree, they are forced to do it against their will, not all but I'll say most.No one is forcing them. No one is threatening them. No one is using violence. No one is extorting them. They voluntarily take the job.Oh, almost forgot... biased again, your's that is.Oh the ignorant and biased one calling me biased, oh the irony. You think in socialism people couldn't start their own "business"? Sure they could if what they came up with were useful in some way and if there were demand for it.That is how capitalism works, if you have an idea and people think it is useful and demand it, you can go ahead and start a business. Working the way up in a company? What for? A person either is suited for the job, has the necessary skills, and wants the job, or the person should not get the position.You don't just show up on your first day and say "I'm qualified to be the leader" you need skills for jobs, most of these skills are developed by working. Also, when you run a company, it is best to know how the company works from bottom to top.Working the way up is living for money, as the higher up it goes the bigger the pay. Living for money is not the way to live.You confuse promotions with raises. Getting a raise just lets you have more money, getting a promotion gives you a new job. In other words, you start at the lower jobs, learn those skills and work your way up to other more advanced jobs. Working for money isn't the way to live, choose a job you love and you never work a day in your life. Wtf??? Not just biased but moronic. You fail to see the connection between the first and the second? Being able to control one's own actions, not just actions but being able to control one's own life has the potential to give happiness and a satisfying job.You have control over your life. You can work hard at something and try to make a living out of it, you have the choice to do that. When someone from the government says "I support what your doing, but we need 40% of your earnings to fund our projects, pay up now" you do not have the choice.It does not mean guaranteed happiness, you can make some choices that will make you very unhappy, but hey, that's your choice. Bias.Saying "Bias." is not an argument. Try again next time. Monopoly is not a bad thing, you know... How can you not know it? If the people in control know what is right and wrong and act according to what is right then a monopoly is an extremely fucking good thing!I don't think all monopolies are bad, I just think most government monopolies are bad. In the free market if you abuse your monopoly and treat your workers like shit and have high prices, Joe Shmoe can open up a store and steal all your customers, he barley even has to try now. When the government abuses their monopoly or are not very good at handling what ever they are running, someone can't start competition, its the government, they have the final say. As for the people incharge being good, incase you haven't noticed, most voters are idiots, don't have ANY knowledge or ideology and simply just think about the elections for 5 minutes then decided which moron they want to vote for. The chance of someone good getting elected is very slim, generally because it doesn't happen very often.