azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Do you have any evidence that suggests that a fetus is not alive at conception?Well, firstly even a lack of evidence wouldn't prove that abortion is inherently wrong.Secondly, there is evidence to support many points of distinction, conception being by far the lowest on the list.Thirdly, simple logic dictates that if you think it is bad to kill a fetus at the point of conception then it is bad to kill any living thing ever. This is because at this early stage there has been no progression whatsoever with the baby - it has absolutely no cognitive ability or organ development or any bodily functions.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Well, firstly even a lack of evidence wouldn't prove that abortion is inherently wrong.Secondly, there is evidence to support many points of distinction, conception being by far the lowest on the list.Thirdly, simple logic dictates that if you think it is bad to kill a fetus at the point of conception then it is bad to kill any living thing ever. This is because at this early stage there has been no progression whatsoever with the baby - it has absolutely no cognitive ability or organ development or any bodily functions.Where do cognitive functions come from?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Where do cognitive functions come from?The brain, they are determined by electronic pulses that go off in response to things. That is what we use to determine cognitive function.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

The brain, they are determined by electronic pulses that go off in response to things. That is what we use to determine cognitive function.How do you know that a baby doesn't have a brain at birth?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

How do you know that a baby doesn't have a brain at birth?Seriously what the fuck do you think abortion is? Of course babies have brains at birth CONCEPTION AND BIRTH ARE DIFFERENT.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Seriously what the fuck do you think abortion is? Of course babies have brains at birth CONCEPTION AND BIRTH ARE DIFFERENT.I obviously meant at conception.Can't you see a typo?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Do you honestly believe that we have brains at conception? At the moment in sex when the egg is fertilized? Do you not see how ridiculous of a claim that is?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Do you honestly believe that we have brains at conception? At the moment in sex when the egg is fertilized? Do you not see how ridiculous of a claim that is?That depends on what you classify as a brain.What do you classify as a brain?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Formula for abortions:Fetus<HumanLowerConciousAnimals<HumanFetus<:LowerConciousAnimalsf(kill)=LowerConciousAnimalsand since Fetus is a subtype of animal, you can plug in Fetus for LowerConciousAnimals:f(kill)=Fetus
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Formula for abortions:Fetus<HumanLowerConciousAnimals<HumanFetus<:LowerConciousAnimalsf(kill)=LowerConciousAnimalsand since Fetus is a subtype of animal, you can plug in Fetus for LowerConciousAnimals:f(kill)=FetusWhat determines consciousness?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

the more people you are able to empathize with, the more consciousness you have.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

the more people you are able to empathize with, the more consciousness you have.If you don't have consciousness, you can't empathise.Which would mean empathy is impossible since you also need empathy to be conscious.Like you have to press B on order to press A, but you can't press A unless you press B.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Like you have to press B on order to press A, but you can't press A unless you press B.That is not a proper analogy. You can't choose to be conscious. You can choose to be empathatic if you are conscious.If B is a switch and it is flipped "on", then you can press A.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

That is not a proper analogy. You can't choose to be conscious. You can choose to be empathatic if you are conscious.If B is a switch and it is flipped "on", then you can press A.You said that empathy is consciousness and that consciousness is empathy.You can't choose B, but you can choose A.This thing that you can choose is triggered from something you can't choose, yet this thing you can't choose is triggered by something you can choose, which in turn is triggered by this thing you can't choose and so on...In other words according to your statement, only A and B can be turned on together going by your logic.Going by your logic, A can't be turned on without B, and B can't be turned on without A.To sum it up, only conscious people are empathic in your world.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

In other words according to your statement, only A and B can be turned on together going by your logic.I don't understand why you think that
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I don't understand why you think thatDid you not say that empathy is caused by consciousness and that consciousness is caused by empathy?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

I did not say that .
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I did not say that.What causes empathy then?What flicks that switch on?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Okay let me say everything difference. Consciousness and empathy go hand in hand. Empathy indicates whether a being is conscious or not.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Okay let me say everything difference. Consciousness and empathy go hand in hand. Empathy indicates whether a being is conscious or not.You're statement implies that all conscious entities have empathy, then.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Yeah, and that the level consciousness can be measured by the amount of empathy an organism can exhibit.That is why it is not okay to kill elephants, but killing flies is okay. Elephants care for their family, hey grieve. So do humans. But unborn babies? Not so much.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Do you regard psychopaths as not being conscious, since they have no empathy?And do you believe that flies therefore have no consciousness as well?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Yup, flies and psychopaths have lower consciousness. The only reason I would feel bad if a totally unempathetic psychopath dies is because he might have a family who cares for him and would grieve.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Yup, flies and psychopaths have lower consciousness. The only reason I would feel bad if a totally unempathetic psychopath dies is because he might have a family who cares for him and would grieve.What do you believe causes empathy?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

I don't know. Complex molecular interactions? Special neurons?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I don't know. Complex molecular interactions? Special neurons?If you don't know, how do you know that empathy exists?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Because you can measure it by the actions of people. Elephants grieve, I grieve, my parents grieve. We also get excited for other people, even if we gain nothing from it.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Because you can measure it by the actions of people. Elephants grieve, I grieve, my parents grieve. We also get excited for other people, even if we gain nothing from it.Do you have to like someone in order to grieve for someone or be pleased for them?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

I guess. But all empathetic people like SOMEONE and can feel emotionally attached to SOMEONE. If you don't care about anyone, you must not be consciously experiencing life. Life must be like a drug
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I guess. But all empathetic people like SOMEONE and can feel emotionally attached to SOMEONE. If you don't care about anyone, you must not be consciously experiencing life. Life must be like a drugWhat makes people like each other, in that case?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Similar interests, being able to bond over important things
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Similar interests, being able to bond over important thingsDon't we all have similar interests in some way?Going by what you are saying, if we didn't all have some of the same interests or sharing the same important values, then we wouldn't be able to empathise with every single person, there would be some people we wouldn't sympathise with.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

As a scientist I as always am pro logic on this issue. Let's face it folks....sometimes..although it is not a pleasant choice..the best option for all concerned is for a disadvantaged pregnant woman or girl to terminate her pregnancy during the first three months. This act solves many if not all potential problems and suffering. Wake up.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

What about the baby's right to choose? .
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

There is no "baby" involved in a 1st trimester abortion.That fetus does not even have a brain or nervous system that can comprehend the word "choose." It is not even a sentient being. Thus, your augment here is moot.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Yes it is a baby. The baby has the same genetic code at conception as she does at birth.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

So would you finger, cut off from your body, be a person, simply because it has the same genetic code?What about a blood sample?Not trying to belittle your stance, I'm just trying to figure out its boundaries.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

A finger will have the same genetic code as the rest of the body, but the zygote has a genetic that is different than both parents. The baby has the same genetic code at conception as she does at birth.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

So it is a living person because of the mixed dna? Or because the dna remains the same?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I am having doubts to be honest. ...............................................
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Nothing wrong with that.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Thank you. I am considering the view that life begins when the fetus has brainwaves.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

why would you choose to think abortion is wrong? It creates so many problems and so much suffering to call it wrong.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

"Am I proud to be an American during this 2016 election?" Yes and No. I have reasons for both.I am not proud of Americans. Because if evolution has any validity, it would show proven as a science of declining, de-evolving, full circle of the rise and fall of mankind, as we evolve to be dense fools!God created perfect balance. The fall put in the law of entropy decaying the heart and soul of mankind. God made man to stand upright in His image, but man's constant descent is proving to be a never-ending fall.I can't believe how unreasonable people have become. So, Im not proud of that.The greatness of America was people side by side, not overtaking each other. We corrected from within. Win win negotiations with fairness in the middle. As a people we respected each others freedooms and rights more than everywhere else in the world. America began with everyone working together and building communities. We were great because each individual's rights and boundaries were considered. The American idea or world view managed that individually according to the golden rule. When we had to, we fought for rights and corrected wrongs. We fought, won fairly, and we actually fought FOR fairness.But today, American rights are shoot, grab, and run! The WORLD VIEW changed! This is not America.So, I am not proud today to be an American.But I am proud of individuals who are still American. So in that way I am proud to be an American.Here is an interesting thing I noticed.Christianity that built us is attacked in our society. An assault these days on faith, disloyalty for I think the first time ever toward Israel also. From attacking the Bible, even discussions on changing its content. Sounds like we are entering the dark ages all over again. Lies in fields of academia about the Bible, even its reliability in its historic content. Equally so America is persecuted by her own children and people of other nations demand our heritage yet burn our flag in our own streets! And our children, America, joins them.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

At what point in American history, exactly, do you think we actually respected each others' freedoms and rights more than everywhere else in the world? When we practiced slavery, when women were disenfranchised, when we interned Japanese citizens without due process, when we criminalized sexual orientation as a private expression which harmed no one, etc? When was America this utopia of equality you believe existed? Christianity certainly has influenced American history, but the democratic ideals the nation was built upon came from enlightenment era philosophy. Or did you never learn / forget that European monarchies at the time were also heavily Christian? The religion was the same across the nations in question, but the philosophy was fundamentally different and that is what made the critical difference (not religion). Also, get over yourself; religion is not "under attack" in America. People not sharing your faith and not accepting its imposition on their personal lives is not an attack on your faith; it's a repudiation of a religious attack on themselves.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Right before Columbus showed up. ;)
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

True. But we try to learn from our mistakes and right our wrongs. We haven't gone back to slavery. Women can now vote. We no longer intern Japanese citizens. Gays are allowed to marry. It's a slow process but it seems to be working ;)
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

I'm very skeptical about the credibility of the idea of progress. It's built on the unsound notion that there is somehow a fixed morality and mode of correctness that we can identify and bend ourselves towards. Slavery still exists. There is a large industry in human trafficking and people who genuinely do not believe it was or is wrong. Those who used to practice it did not think it was wrong either. Neither did those who barred women from politics, discriminated against gays, etc. Tomorrow will look at today and say it was bad, and their tomorrow will look at them the same way. This is not because we are progressing, though, but because morality is context sensitive. It varies by time and place and person.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

There seems to me to be a fixed morality in place in all cultures. Murder, theft, sloth, greed are all seen as acts that are against the grain of social harmony. The simple notion of freedom is spreading across the world. The facts about slavery, the treatment of women, or any other activities working against freedom for everyone, that you point to, don't erase the progress we've made, it least not in my opinion. It seems that the perspective you offer could also be used to say that science, or medicine have not progressed because there are still people somewhere who think the world is flat, or madness is caused by evil spirits. Does that make sense to you?
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

I think we've covered this already, but it's been a while. Briefly: While murder, theft, sloth, greed seem to exist across cultures what constitutes each varies considerably between and even within cultures. They're not universal when you get into how they are actually applied. The difference between morality and science is that the former cannot be studied with any objective means and the latter can. We cannot quantify morality, measure it, etc. the way we can oxygen. It cannot be proved or disproved, etc. That said, I'm not tremendously attached to the mythos of science anyways.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

As a culture in society we did. We didnt destroy our community baker over their faith. We respected their freedom, and with freedom we chose anther baker!!
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Repeating a vague allusion to a time when society was egalitarian is not an answer to my question.So, once more: when exactly did this fabled equality exist in America?
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

humamistic world view and controlling faith by fascism. They call exercising their "freedom of religion" as "freedom from religion." So to them, silencing other people's religion is their right in exercising their freedom of religion! Since when is it American for one persons freedom of religion, a mandate to silence another's freedom to exercise religion by its conduct and influence in our everyday lives?Fyi oppressing and silencing the influence of faith in peoples lives is literally a breach in the establishment clause! Freedom to exercise faith means we are all free to influence and all are free to be influenced by their own choices. Now media steers and oppression denies people their own choices of the influence of faith throughout their communities. The politically correct with oppressive intolerance silence freedom of faith, and accuse its influence of intolerance. We live in a world thats darker than ever. Because truth is true in the eyes of the beholder, and truth needs to stay silent. Political correct speech is the Spirit of antichrist. It is used to silence the influence of faith of the only True God, to keep all in darkness. As slaves to its gods.As long as we all agree to not speak truth out in public, and we heartily agree to hide truth that offends, and exalt each one's lies as if truth. Tolerance each one as a true god, tickling theur ears and stroking their egos according to each one's own mind. Bowing down to their truths as if they were their own gods. Freedom is iron sharpens iron, and truth is the standard. We each have free choice to choose as we will. But to present is illegal because the spirit of tolerance is from Hell. False peace silences truth In this age political correction, social shaming, silencing of truth, tolerance sold as peace. Truth offends.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

In other words, then, you cannot identify any point in American history where society was actually egalitarian. All the rest of your comment is entirely non-responsive to the question I have now asked you clearly and repeatedly. Once you either concede the question you have answered or actually attempt to answer it, then answer me this as well: In what way, exactly, has anyone ever restricted your ability to practice your faith in your personal life? P.S. Do not err in assuming that I support PC culture. I categorically don't, but I still think your belief that your beliefs are being suppressed is unfounded and indefensible.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

Since Im not a baker or in the wedding industry I have not. But the potential is there. And stirring society in a certain way, so as to shame others into silence or to have every sign of religion removed is literaaly an attack on religious freedom.Even the law type not black and white has also contributed by legal presedence and making morals a discrimanotry matter. Its been a tearing down of respect for the values of people to live their faith. Globalization and the spirit of this age are the spirit of antichristIf interested watch https://youtu.be/zN36168k2_I
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

The potential is there for any right to be violated, and it's fairly evident that other groups have had their rights violated more regularly and more severely than Christians in this country. Slavery. Disenfranchisement of women, non-land owning persons, incarcerated people, etc. The Trail of Tears, Japanese internment. I'd agree that a private business that takes no public funds should be able to decline service for any reason, but I disagree that this signals any sort of war on faith such as you've heavily suggested. And in this case the courts did adjudicate upon it as a civil rights issue where that right was viewed as infringing on the rights of another, so unless you want to reject the authority of the judiciary to mediate such rights conflicts then you have to accept that ruling as consistent with the Constitution.Desegregation laws are not interchangeable with this scenario, because they often dealt with state action which would have been publicly funded and therefore in violation of the Constitution. Again, I would be inclined to agree that private persons should have autonomy, but public operations or those funded by the public in any proportion should not. Otherwise you are stealing money from people to finance what they will never be able to benefit from. I don't watch video links, but if you want to explain it in your own words I'll read that. I'll say off the bat thought that I don't give a whit about whether something is the antichrist, so if you want me to care you'll have to ground it in something more tangible... like clear and direct harms to people.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

What's your point? I already told you I'm not a communist, or otherwise liberal. I'm not making any arguments to which this could possibly be relevant.Rant against the pinko commies all you like. That still doesn't answer the question as to when in American history people were equal, as you claimed they were. Safe to assume you can't, at this point, so that matter's closed.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

Actually the joining of Catholocism and Rome was birthed out of antichrist also. Rev is all about it Creating a one world anything creates a regime to feed those in power. It will result in world wide slavery as all work to feed the beast.And this thread of power hungry regimes is of the same mold and illumanatie and Luciferianism and other radical groups seek to control others even their way of thinking, and they are in education fields of study motivated by that aggenda.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Another entirely non-responsive post in response to my arguments. I'd say I'm surprised, but really I'm not. Incidentally, if you think power actually cares about political philosophy (liberal, conservative, etc.) then you're just a puppet for those who have it. Ideologies are instruments used by those with power to keep people with less power fighting other people with less power. You're such a good puppet. Dance puppet, dance. Call your strings freedom even while someone else moves you.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

Wow hello? The party is a door, bear left and open air free fall! The liberal world view is straight out of HellOpen your eyes and see whats behind it all. Its the spirit of the age and that is spirit of antichrist. Globalization and the co-exist one world religion is to empower a one world government over our lives and our souls. God commands us to self govern, even if it costs us everything even our lives. Ruling in goodness, rewarded but not in self-elevating The greatest is the least. We are commanded to direct our own lives, and be captains of our own souls. WhenbHe put man in the garden, He told him to subdue all the earth. Only truth, goodness, mercy, can truely be free. America was listening for God and heard Him in 1776To co-exist in pollitical correct (in)tolerance is to live in a dark pit of collectivism, like an unmarked grave.