Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

It seems you’re lost in this conversation and now you’re just trying to talk your way out of it. He is the Judge and law…For the sake of saving space, I’m not going to paste your long rant here. Fact is, yes in this country we do sentence people to death…for heinous crimes! We don’t execute people for matters of disobeying your parents, working on the Sabbath, having sex with your sister-in-law (but sex with your biological sister seems to be okay in the Bible), or for simply not believing the same thing as you. All of these and more are reasons to put someone to death in the Bible; not just rape.If so, then why did you relate a man's rape to God, and concluding it to law then, when it wasn't Him in the action.Why? Because God game the permission to do so. They didn’t act on their own accord, but were instructed to do so.You will need real evidence with all your senses.And no such evidence has ever been provided. Which of the senses can be used to experience this evidence? At least you proved something, you lack focus.We are examining beats by dre and you deviate to talk about JBLNo, no, no. You make the claim there is evidence for Jesus and that he had superpowers, you need to back it up. Don’t come after me for lacking focus just because my questions are becoming too difficult for you. You believe Jesus is real and that he was somehow supernatural? Prove it.As you can see, am defending a part of it(about jesus)....how do you defend what you don't knowYou’re trying to defend it, but you can’t defend the Bible through the use of the Bible. If I don’t believe it to be true, what difference does it make what it says?So about owning plenty bibles isn't a valid argument or else you wouldn't be asking such a silly question.Again, you’re caught in your fallacious claim and now trying to talk your way out of it. You ask if I own a Bible, I say yes, and you claim it’s irrelevant. Something you seem to be unaware of is that most atheists have read the Bible, cover to cover, multiple times; often the reason why we’re atheists (such is the case with me). Christians are forced to read it with rose-tinted glasses and are blind to atrocities either committed by God or at the hand of man under the instruction from God. What You search is what you find.Not always. People have been searching for Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster, but just because you’re looking for it doesn’t mean you’ll find it. You google dog and you expect to find elephant?The ability to find things through Google and through archeology are two entirely different things. If I search “Loch Ness Monster” on Google I will find results on it, yet those who keep searching in the real world keep coming up short.You still distrust science?This is your claim, not mine. I do trust science, but the problem is science would have no way of proving a skeleton to be a particular person without samples that are known to be his. Even in forensics, DNA found at a crime scene is worthless if there’s nothing to compare it with. Actually, it's entirely the same. They were entirely kicked out of the garden.(i call it abandoning)Call it what you want, it’s not. I’ve known parents who have kicked their kids out of the house because they refused to follow the rules. The parents still loved them and would help in any way they needed, but they were simply not allowed to live under the same roof.  You don't know when a question becomes usesless,huh?Again, you’re not keeping track of the conversation and trying to talk your way out. What you failed to address was not a question, it was a statement; and when a person is incapable of addressing such a simple statement, it becomes quite apparent the statement was far from useless. Find the word creating the relationship (the verb) between your question and my replyNo, your statement, “Understanding is not a certificate (PHD) for Him,” does not make sense. What is a “PHD for Him”? Are you referring to a PhD in theology? If so, it is rather impossible to have a PhD without understanding the material. Now proof for jesus becomes adam and eve? That for a different time.Pls stay focused.My focus is fine. Once again you’ve gotten lost, but you still can’t talk your way out of it. You asked who claimed people existed before Adam and Eve and I answered it. Even so, the universe wasn't created in just a dayNope, according to your silly book it took just 6 days (despite the 13.8 billion history we can observe and the 4.5 billion year timeframe of the earth). So in 6 days he was capable of creating everything from scratch, yet took several thousand years to work out that he needed to commit suicide to magically take away sin. If he was able to create everything so quickly, he should have been able to work out the cure for sin over lunch, and that method could easily have not included suicide. ah, have you ever had a biblee.?Yes, but I’m still not convinced you ever have. You seem to be doing the same as most Christians by just picking through the stuff that makes them feel good without actually questioning the authenticity of it. when i see such silly questions from you.....I’ll admit, that was a bad example, but to more accurately compare it with the ridiculous salvation story, if someone were to witness a person about to drink poison, they would simply run over and prevent them from drinking it; they wouldn’t drink it themselves, though.