azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin did not just murdered people, he took freedom away from Russia. he banned the people to have religion. He organised lectures that criticized religion to be 'harmful superstitious'. He even messed with the minds of the people. making them worship him as a leader, portraying himself as a fatherly, cheerful and popular man.He taught the wrong things to innocent children. For examples, he had changed the educational system making them learn things like how he played a key and heroic role during the October 1917 Revolution which was not true.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

I disagree to the statement and i strongly think that Stalin is way more ruthless since during WWII ,he encouraged tactics that led to the deaths of about 8,000,000 of his own soldiers.Stalin's policies meant no mercy to prisoners, huge numbers died after being taken captive during the war. . Following WWII, Stalin instigated a policy of terror on the German people. This led to many German civilians being murdered and thousands more committing suicide. Stalin enforced brutal police states on all the peoples of eastern Europe which he overran with his armies. Tens of thousands died in these takeovers. German POWs were kept in horrible conditions for as long as ten years after the war, leading to the deaths of at least a few millions. he also launched an unprovoked war with Japan, killing tens of thousands of Japanese troops and capturing many others. Stalin is estimated to have been responsible for possibly 60 Million Deaths.They all suffered terribly under his repression. Compared to hitler, hitler only tortured the jews but Stalin was torturing the whole entire German.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Yes, but is it not true that if Stalin wasn't ruthless in preventing retreat, Russia would have been defeated? Also, Hitler did not just "torture" the Jews. He also mistreated the Slavs (such as the Czechs, Poles, Russians, Ukranians, Belorussians, Slovakians, etc.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Even though Stalin progressed lots in industrailisation, he mistreated the labours of the workers. Not only they are paid little, in terms of working hours is also long. In addition,they are also not provided with basic neccessities such as shoes and food. Those who resisted were placed to forced labour or concentration camps.However hitler treated his own people with more care and love.-yanyu marcus joel
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin rose to power by cunningly outwitting his rivals and using his positon to create propaganda.Hitler on the other hand,rose to power because of his own strenghts like his charisma and oratorial skills.This tells us that Stalin was more ruthless in rising to power compared to Hitler.-zikri n anwar
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin killed many people that were his fellow citizens, Hitler targeted the Jews for a reason because when Germans are in poverty, the Jews were rich, thus they hated the jews. Of course, Hitler wanted to help his own German people and the only way to do so was to eliminate the Jews but Stalin eliminated everyone that opposed him, he did not want anyone to get in his way and overthrow him as he was paranoid. Stalin did not do anything to provide anything for Soviet Union except for the increasing products of coal, steel, oil and electricity which does not really improved much for the country. Whereas Hitler helped Germany during the Great Depression. - Denise and Sohyee
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Stalin may have killed many people who were his fellow citizens but murder is still murder... You can't possibly justify how one is more evil than the other by looking at who they murdered. Also, Hitler did not only targeted the Jews, he also targeted the other minorities such as Gypsies, homosexuals, handicapped and disabled. Stalin killed those people in a paranoid, confused state of mind. Hitler eliminated those in his way with a clear mindset to reach his goal. -Swee Yingyi and Melinda Chen
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

I think Stalin was more evil. For one, he killed way more people that Hitler, and two, he killed people for all kinds or reasons. Hitler killed just Jews, and he at least gave them a quicker death than Stalin. Stalin sent Russians to Siberia to freeze and die.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Hitler was an important turning point in Germany's economic situation. He created better lives for the people through re-employment and the emergence of big industries. Stalin, on the other hand, made lives worser for the russians as evident from the failure of the five year plans in achieving same economic and military levels as the western powers.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin's over-cautiousness led to his loss of skilled people which is important in overseeing the success of russia's growth.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin forced his people to work in industries with poor working conditions that include working 7 days a week with little pay and one man has to do what 4 men has to do and not allowed to move during working hours. He practically made his people slaves in their own country.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin killed millions of innocent Russians with a clear mind, knowing what he himself is thinking. He killed his own people to have absolute power and would do anything to achieve his goals. He does not care about Russians but on the other hand, Hitler wants to do good for the Germans using his ways and many German supported him, he was a well-loved leader by the Germans. Hitler kills people that he thought was the root of the problems in Germany. -sy and dw
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin introduced collectivisation in USSR had led famine and riots causing the death the millions and millions of Russians. Many farmers burnt their crops and resulted in not enough food for the people in USSR. Even though Stalin knew many people were suffering from famine, he continued in his ways, taking whatever crops left to sell to other countries. He also rejected food aid from the USA. Through this single event, it can be seen that he does not care about his fellow people. Whereas, Hitler would solve problems for Germany. -sy and dw
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Furthermore, this starvation created by Stalin could have been prevented but he chose not to.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

There are a lot of things that prove that Stalin is worse than Hitler. Both of their girlfriends committed suicide. By all accounts Hitler was very sad and possibly crying, but Stalin didn't care about his dead wife, he didn't even go to her funeral. That shows that Stalin was more heartless and soulless than Hitler-Lim Yanyu , Joel Neo , Marcus Liong
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin should be at the TOP. The concentration camps were bad and sad but the Gulags were worse. The difference is that the ghettos were only used for the Jews and sometimes the prisoners of war. But the Gulags were just almost anyone they can lay eyes on and the cold in Siberia was terrible, the rooms were made out of wood without pillows were any soft materials for sleeping they also sometimes didn't have heaters. He always wanted to be the best and strongest.-Lim Yanyu, Marcus Liong, Joel Neo
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Sure, Hitler was bad, but compared to Stalin, he was a saint! Stalin killed somewhere between 6 million to 30 million people (we will never know) just to institute fear! Anyone who disagreed with Stalin was either killed by the KGB or sent to work camps in Siberia and never seen again. He was also leader of the USSR for MUCH longer than Hitler was the leader of Germany. -yanyu marcus joel
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Hitler rewarded people as they deserve. He improved working conditions for many. However Stalin had caused famine for many even though he could have avoided it. He has killed a millions of people. Stalin uses despicable means and killings to rise to power. He implemented propaganda or made up untrue information to let people support him. Example : Acting like he was close to Lenin. However for Hitler, he rises up through proper legal ways without as much killings like him.-yanyu,marcus,joel
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin forced people out of their normal lives to have collective farms and more workers for industrialisation and made life difficult. People would also harm people they disliked by informing the army of the people and that they talked about Stalin being a bad person or communism should not have taken place.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

He acted to be close to Lenin just to get people to notice him he ordered people to kill those that had potential in becoming his future rival and cleared his or her existence and they were cleared from history. Children in schools learnt about him being a great leader for communism. He was worse than Hitler.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Hitler only hated the Jews because he had suffered through WWI and he felt unfair that as the Russians army was suffering, the Jews were living a great life. He wasn't Evil he was just resentful and just wanted a fair treatment. Stalin on the other hand, just wanted fame and status. He wanted to be worshiped and admired at. Because of his desire to be 'god' he killed and tortured people. he took away their freedom, he forced workers to work non-stop everyday. Doesn't that make him evil?
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin was more ruthless I would say. People always call Hitler for what he did to the Jews, but really Stalin was no gem either. Just because Hitler did something people had never really seen or anticipated before, doesn't make him more of a monster than Stalin.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

no you guys ignore the most ruthless man of them all. George W. Bush killed millions of people yet we never hear about. he probably has dead people in his back yard. mr. wingnut himself is a communist and rapist. conservatives tried to bury this fact and i will not take it any longer
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Hitler was evil, but he did seek to better the German economy, which was really bad at the time. Stalin purposefully starved millions of his own people, civilians and soldiers alike. Hitler may have killed 5-10 million, but Stalin killed between 20 and 60 million, alot of which were Russian.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Hitler was sick. Not saying Stalin wasn't, but what Hitler did was child's play compared to what Stalin did.Besides, wasn't it Himmler's idea to execute the Jews?
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

There was no such plan to execute the Jews. What do think the transfer agreement was for? The claims about the murdering of Jews in the German concentration camps have been very much disputed by historical revisionist. After watching their videos and listening to their arguments I am now 100% convinced our history books are all a pack of lies.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

The claims about the murdering of Jews in the German concentration camps have been very much disputed by historical revisionist. The only legitimately true thing you have said, ironically enough, is something you didn't mean to say.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

The victors of wars create the history books. Just as we were lied to about the 9/11 attacks by Fake Jews in order to justify war after war in the Middle East we were also lied to about Hitler. That fact is the Illuminati have taken control of all mainstream media, so called "news networks", and publishers. Ask yourself why the real criminals behind JFK's killing were never brought to justice. Ask yourself why we are told three high rise buildings were brought down supposedly by office fires on 9/11 at nearly the same speed as free fall Acceleration.Then ask yourself why the so called investigators would not have known that the core support structures would have made such an acceleration of fall theoretically impossible.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

the soviets, especially under stalin, suffered more than the nazis. more people died, and less people weren't treated on a lesser scale than the most worthless bug or bacteria.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I think that there isn't a single person that can be judged. if you're a guy you don't choose to be attracted to women. right? I dont think anyone should be told who they can or can't be with. you have the right to be with whoever you want, and you shouldn't be judged for it. i feel that homosexuals should be able to mary. and for realigious people. you say it's a sin to be homosexual, in the bible it says if you judge you'll be condimed to hell. so once my sexualality condems me i'll see you there for your judgement.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: The Bible is not against homosexuals

The bible doesn't say its a sin to be homosexual but rather for a man to lie with a man is a sin much like adultery or to steal murder and various other things is a sin. Quit misrepresenting God's truths its not helpful to him or anyone else.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

But it doesn't state what they mean by lying with a manIn the bible (I have been told by a Christian) Jesus lies in the same bed as a man to warm him upThis means he has "sinned"The bible overlaps itself, everything had a consequenceIf we lived 100% by the bible life would suck
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Holy shit Jacklister. Either 1,000,000 monkeys have been randomly typing shit under an elephant avatar, or you might be the first elephant avatar to make sense on anything... Too bad there's no such thing as republicans anymore. Tough luck there.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

If you don't know what the bible says about a topic, Shut up. Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper.""1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

THe onely person that needs to shut up is you. Not only are you bashing people for their lack of knowlege but you are being completly hypocritical by neglecting the other side of the story. The bible says not to judge others and how that is a sin and that all sins are equal so you are just as wrong in this situation.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I'm agnostic. The Bible doesn't relate to me. And even if it did, there are many MANY laws that everyday Christians choose to ignore, like the consumption of shellfish. Why is it okay for Christians to ignore that religious law but bash gays for breaking laws in the same book?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Yes, being gay/lesbian is not wrong, but being in a relationship with someone of the same sex is. God created man for woman, and woman for man. Without heterosexual people in this world, the human race would fail to continue.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

IF YOU DO IT YOUR WAY YOU WILL LOSE AND YOU WILL BE JUDGED BY THE ALMIGHTY, IF YOU DO IT GOD'S WAY YOU WILL BE BLESSED. TAKE YOUR FREE WILL PICK, CHOOSE, HOMOSEXUALITY THAT COMES FROM THE DEVIL SATAN WITH ITS CANDY COATED SIN, LOOKS GOOD FEELS GOOD, DO IT, BUT THE CONSEQUENCES MUST BE PAYED BY YOU, ARE YOU WILLING TO PAY THE PIPER, OK YOU DECIDED, ITS OK IM HAVING SO MUCH FUN, DON'T STOP RAM ME BANG ME DO IT BABY DO IT LOVER, BAM ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU HAVE A HEART ATTACK, MAN THAT IS NO WAY TO GO, IF YOU WERE MARRIED AND DIED AFTER SEX, THATS HONORALBE IN THE SIGHT OF GOD, BUT IF YOU DIE IN YOUR SINS, THEN CHANCES ARE YOU WILL FIND YOURSELF IN A RUDE AWAKENING. SO IF YOU FOLLOW HOMOSEXUALITY, YOU LOVE GAGA HALF MAN HALF WOMEN FREAK OF NATURE, OR YOU LOVE SATANS WORLD OF DILDOS, WHORES WITH AIDS GUYS WITH AIDS, DICK FALLS OFF, WHAT YOU REAP IS WHAT YOU SOW, YOU SOUND LIKE A PERSON WHO HAS NO CLUE, GET A CLUE, A LITTLE PIECE OF GRAY MATTER BECAUSE BUDDY IT SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ON YOUR WAY THE THAT PLACE OF PARADISE AND SEXUAL BLISS, HELL THE PARTY PLACE. FOOL YOURSELF ALL YOU WANT BUT THE BIBLE FROM ANOTHER TIME AND SPACE DIMENSION SAYS YOU WILL BE JUDGED BY SOMEONE GREATER THAN YOURSELF, EVER ACT OF THE BODY WILL BE GIVEN AN ACCOUNT ON THE DAY OF JUDEMENT. EVERY KNEE WILL BOW EVERY TONGUE WILL CONFESS THE JESUS CHRIST IS LORD, TO THE GLORY OF GOD, EVEN SATAN IN THE LAKE OF FIRE WILL FINALLY CONFESS THAT JESUS CHRIST IS LORD, SO IF SATAN GIVES IN AT THE LAST, IM SURE YOU'LL GIVE IN AT THE FIRST, SO CHOSE YOU THIS DAY WHOM YOU WILL SERVE, BECAUSE WE ALL MUST STAND BEFORE THE JUDGEMENT SEAT OF CHRIST, TO GIVE AN ACCOUNT OF THE THINGS WE HAVE DONE TO THE BODY WEATHER THEY BE GOOD OR BAD, WE WILL GIVE AN ACCOUNT SO STOP FOOLING YOURSELF, ITS NOT ABOUT YOU, IT IS ALL THE CHRIST HAS DONE FOR US, READ THE BIBLE YOU DECEIVED ON MY WAY TO HELL DUDE.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

No u need to get a clue .....For all u religiouse peolple(theres nothing wronge with it) who like to judge ppl u shoudnt be involved in other ppls buisness....and i dont think its right for u to say that homosexualls are going to hell(if here is one)... As you can tell by my remark im athiest and im also gay so who are u to to come here and judge ppl for being human thats not right u wouldnt like it if i were to judge you for ur belifes so before u come here just to piss ppl off remember that everybody is human and we all need to set aside our differences and make the world a better place for all of us
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Actually the bible said u should be happy when you are persecuted/judged for your belief in Christ...
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

If you don't want to hear people disagree with your lifestyle choice, don't come to the "is homosexuality wrong" debate.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You've just committed a big sin there, I'll see you in non existent hell as I look down on you from non existent heavenNow, try to explain your argument without using a religion as your backing
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

All i was trying to say was that when your gay u always have religiouse ppl against you because of ur orientation and i dont think its fair that on the voting ballat for legalizing gay marrage that people dont vote yes because either they dont like it or its because it there religion(and no government cant make a law that has do do with religionor something along thoese lines)..... And second of all yes in the eyes of religiose ppl "i did make a sin" how do u really know that there is a heven nd a hell....have u had any real peices of evidance?(its just something to thinkk about when ur dealing with aithiests)
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Wheres your evedance of where u can justify that there is a hevan and hell
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

I'm not sure I'm "for homosexuality" any more than I am "for polygamy". But I don't believe that we should dictate what types of relationships are "appropriate" between consenting adults and which are not. As for homosexuality being a "choice"...I don't know a single straight person who will admit to having CHOSEN to be straight. You are what you are.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I don't think that people who are against homosexuality truly think of homosexuality, i.e. sexual attraction to people of your own sex, to be a choice. It's more that they think of the actual act of being in a gay relationship or having gay sex to be a choice, which is true.Historical homophobic laws, for example, tended not to target people for the sole reason that they felt sexually attracted to the wrong people; they targeted specific acts like sodomy. Even religion, as far as I know, didn't condemn homosexuality per se. The Bible condemns "men who have sex with other men", i.e. people who choose to engage in gay sex. Homosexuality in itself was seen to be more like a mental disorder that made you prone to commit the crime of sodomy, kinda like how psychopathy is seen to make you prone to be a criminal...
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

Well, it's certainly a lot easier to condemn homosexual acts when you're heterosexual, isn't it?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

I'm straight, but my philosophy of life is basically letting everyone be who they want to be, as long as they don't disturb me or others.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

I believe that you should be able to be with whoever you want to be with, be them the same sex or opposite sex. We are allowed religious freedom here in the US. Why not sexual freedom? We are allowed to speak our minds. Why not let people show affection towards someone they love even if they are of the same sex?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Homosexuality is gay ; )