azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Axmeister's Errors:-US armed forces left Iraq-Native Americans were wiped out-Native Americans didn't have firearms-Great Britain didn't need food exported from America-Japan was "preparing" to surrender in WW2 before the A-bomb-England was not involved in the Hundred years war.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Wait hold on...why did you edit out my article? You made the claim that the food didn't help at all, and yet you feel the need to ignore the fact that extensive rationing and food shortages occurred in your country. Did you not say that you admit when you are not wrong? Clearly the massive amounts of food imported into your country was much needed, or you navy wouldn't have had a need to defend our trade ships nor would Germany have felt the need to cut off your food supply.You are being very disingenuous here.I know of all these other factors but you can't deny that if you had been able to sell your food to us your chances of depression would have shrunk enormously.Apparently you don't know. You didn't even know there was a huge drought in the western United States during this time, nor would I expect you to, your educational system probably doesn't even teach about the Dust Bowl expect perhaps on a university level. You didn't even know about the exploitation of India, you thought that your country improved the conditions in India, when in truth your country we siphoning wealth from India and using their population as an expansion of your military force.Britain is clearly betterAn example of blind nationalism.No, it isn't but it doesn't mean that you know more than I doAt least on this subject, I do.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

Actually, at the time the French really hated us, the British, and joined forces with the Americans. King George III would not surrender such a large land mass to an army of 200. At the time the French ranked #1 biggest army with England right behind them. So the Americans didn't win that war buy themselves.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

A lot of people hate the USA because we have had some questionable leaders in the past and maybe done a few stupid things. Above all though, I think people are just jealous. The totally ignore what good we have done for the world. The entire ocean would be like the coast of Somalia if the American Navy was not protecting everyone. We've probably invented many everyday things that you take for granted. We also beat the Nazis and Japanese and saved your snobby British butts. Then we kept the peace unlike what you did after WWI. Oh, and did I mention how many wars we have stopped?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"A lot of people hate the USA because "They're bastards"The totally ignore what good we have done for the world."You've done hardly anything but you brag so much about it"The entire ocean would be like the coast of Somalia if the American Navy was not protecting everyone."In theory we still own the ocean as we won it in the Battle of Trafalger"We've probably invented many everyday things that you take for granted. "You invented things that make people lazier,e.g. automatic gear shift, we actually invented useful things"We also beat the Nazis and Japanese and saved your snobby British butts."We could have easily won the war without you.You only joined when we were winning anyway."Then we kept the peace unlike what you did after WWI. Oh, and did I mention how many wars we have stopped?"HA! that is your biggest fail, you have so much military and nuclear weapons yet you can't use it because you represent world peace XD
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

They're bastardsThose bastards are you greatest allies.In theory we still own the ocean as we won it in the Battle of TrafalgerOnly an idiot would argue that one nation literally owns the entire ocean.we actually invented useful thingsPlease do not try to argue that the United States has not invented useful things.We could have easily won the war without youDon't be pretentious. Your military was being destroyed by the Germans.You only joined when we were winning anyway.What do you consider winning? When the United States entered the war, the British were stuck on their island slowly building up for an offensive. They hadn't even launched a successful offensive against the Axis at that point.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"Those bastards are you greatest allies."Some allies they are, didn't even help us properly at WW2."Only an idiot would argue that one nation literally owns the entire ocean."Only an idiot would argue against someone with only an insult."Please do not try to argue that the United States has not invented useful things."Wait a sec, your asking me to argue against myself?(debates are supposed to be for 2 people)"Don't be pretentious. Your military was being destroyed by the Germans."Do you learn history? our military wasn't destroyed by Germans, if your going to make a staement like that at least have sources to back it up."What do you consider winning? When the United States entered the war, the British were stuck on their island slowly building up for an offensive. They hadn't even launched a successful offensive against the Axis at that point."What so if the USA are bombarded by bombs night after night and then finally defeats the enemy in an epic battle, it can instantly recover and then launch attacks? also while we were apparently "slowly building up offensives" we were also infiltrating German High Command and tricking them with our secret service. maybe our country still hasn't told you the amount of undercover operations we administerd but here's one as an example:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mincemeat
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Some allies they are, didn't even help us properly at WW2.We didn't help you "properly"? I would get angry at that statement but I have come to learn that I shouldn't blame retards for the stupid things they say. By the way, the United States lost more soldiers in World War II than the United Kingdom.Only an idiot would argue against someone with only an insult.What other way could I possibly argue against it? If someone tells you that one country literally owns every ocean on the planet, what would you do? Its completely idiotic to even suggest something like that.your asking me to argue against myself?What? How did you get that out of what I said? You made some implication that the United States has not invented anything useful and I told you not to argue that because, along with your other arguments, its completely ridiculous.our military wasn't destroyed by Germans, if your going to make a staement like that at least have sources to back it up.You really need to read my statements more carefully. I never said that the military of the United Kingdom was destroyed by the Germans. I said that it was being destroyed. There is a pretty big difference there.then finally defeats the enemy in an epic battleI guess your talking about the Battle of Britain? If so, then you must know that that was an offensive for the Germans and the British were simply defending themselves. I don't mean to belittle the strength of the United Kingdom's forces, but its much easier to win a battle when your not the one trying to invade a heavily fortified island filled with troops. No intelligent person would suggest that the Battle of Britain was the point at which England started to win the war.we were also infiltrating German High Command and tricking them with our secret serviceMost if not all of the missions meant to deceive the Axis powers were carried out after the US entered the war.maybe our country still hasn't told youThat's an odd way to phrase it........
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"We didn't help you "properly"? I would get angry at that statement but I have come to learn that I shouldn't blame retards for the stupid things they say."There was a point where Britain was repeatedly being bombard by German bombers, France had been conquered and Russia preoccupied.And what does your country do? nothing. "By the way, the United States lost more soldiers in World War II than the United Kingdom."We had a higher pecentage than you,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_War_II_Casualties2.svg Also, according to the graph on the website, the difference between the deaths of our two countrys is hardly seeable."What other way could I possibly argue against it? If someone tells you that one country literally owns every ocean on the planet, what would you do? Its completely idiotic to even suggest something like that."Yet you haven't found any evidence that disagrees with the evidence I have placed."You really need to read my statements more carefully. I never said that the military of the United Kingdom was destroyed by the Germans. I said that it was being destroyed. There is a pretty big difference there."This is one small country against an alliance that has conquered Europe and you gave us no help, yet you still expect our army to have survived untouched?"I guess your talking about the Battle of Britain? If so, then you must know that that was an offensive for the Germans and the British were simply defending themselves. I don't mean to belittle the strength of the United Kingdom's forces,"It was a major turning point of the Second World War "but its much easier to win a battle when your not the one trying to invade a heavily fortified island filled with troops."Exactly what I've been saying to you americans who keep bringing up the U.S revolution."No intelligent person would suggest that the Battle of Britain was the point at which England started to win the war."Only a complete idiot would make a statement like that without any sources to back it up.http://www.helium.com/items/819304-the-battle-of-britain-a-turning-point-in-world-war-ii http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWbritainB.htm and as you can clearly see these people are intelligent."Most if not all of the missions meant to deceive the Axis powers were carried out after the US entered the war."Where is your evidence of such claims?"That's an odd way to phrase it........"Thats the way it is
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

And what does your country do? nothing.Don't blame a country for failing to quickly jumping into a foreign conflict that would have undisputedly lead to a loss of life of it's own citizens. Shall I blame your country for failing to help the United States after Pearl Harbor?We had a higher pecentage than youHuman life is too valuable to consider loss in terms of percentage. When disasters occur, people don't mention what percentage of a certain country died, they say how many people died.Yet you haven't found any evidence that disagrees with the evidence I have placed.Really? Are you really dumb enough to try to prove this to someone? You are ridiculously stupid....Sources: http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/8_1.htm http://www.mcatoolkit.org/Overview/Basics_Boundaries.html yet you still expect our army to have survived untouchedI didn't expect anything. I was simply saying that your country's military was being destroyed, which is the truth.It was a major turning point of the Second World WarNot because the British won, but because the Germans gained their first significant loss.Exactly what I've been saying to you americans who keep bringing up the U.S revolution.That's a separate issue.Only a complete idiot would make a statement like that without any sources to back it up.LOL. Yeah, but an even dumber person oppose the point and provide sources that lack to say the contrary. The Battle of Britain may have been a turning point in the war, but it was most certainly not the point at which Britain started to win. That took place after Britain gained momentum. You misread what I typed, again.Where is your evidence of such claims?The US joined on December 8th of 1941, look at the dates of these missions:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Accumulator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bagration http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barclay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_El_Alamein#Operation_Bertram http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Avalanche_(World_War_II)#Salerno_landings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bodyguard Those are the first 6 of a list of 21. If you wish to further your studies, there is a list at the bottom of the pages which provides the entire list.Thats the way it is"maybe our country still hasn't told you" <----- lol is that the way it is? Does that sound right to you?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

blahalbhalhbalbjaihba chips and burgers bleheheehee blaha blahbha -.--.--..-
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

England has fish and chips. i like fish and chips. and snails :D
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

Why have you included only 2 of the world many countries? Why am even asking this debate seems pretty stupid anyway
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

USA! because the country is more technologically bounded, economically progressive, nationally secured, etc.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

the country is more technologically boundedWhat does that even mean?economically progressiveCare to give an example?nationally securedAs the World Trade Centre was secure?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

What does that even mean?It means that we have invented more than you.Care to give an example?Ummm.. we have the highest GDP in the world?As the World Trade Centre was secure?Nor were your subways
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

It means that we have invented more than you.You mean like the rotary steam engine, the train, calculus (fuck you Leibniz), the internet, the computer, the police, the electric motor, the microphone, the lawn mower, the machine gun, the tank, the jet engine, the submarine, the hovercraft, the incandescent light bulb, the electrical generator, the fire extinguisher, the digital audio player, hydraulics, the adjustable spanner, the Bessemer process... ? I could go on. we have the highest GDP in the worldThe EU has the highest GDP in the world.Nor were your subwaysA train versus two of the largest and most important buildings in the United States?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

calculus (fuck you Leibniz)I thought Calculus was Newton or did I miss something?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

I thought Calculus was Newton or did I miss something?Isaac Newton was born in, educated in and never set foot in any country other than England.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Oh I wasn't disputing that.(fuck you Leibniz)Who is Leibniz?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Who is Leibniz?A German mathematician who had the audacity to claim the invention of calculus as his own, damn his eyes.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Ah, this could prove useful. Chances are however it is merely trivial ;)
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

You mean like the rotary steam engine, the train, calculus (fuck you Leibniz), the internet, the computer, the police, the electric motor, the microphone, the lawn mower, the machine gun, the tank, the jet engine, the submarine, the hovercraft, the incandescent light bulb, the electrical generator, the fire extinguisher, the digital audio player, hydraulics, the adjustable spanner, the Bessemer process... ? I could go on.Atomic bomb, The Airplane, Circular saw, Vulcanized rubber, Polio vaccine, Assembly line, Particle Accelerator, Lasers, Pacemakers, Morse code, Radar, Personal Computers, Nuclear submarine, Bifocals, Sunglasses, Common Lightswitch, Motorcycles, Breakfast cereal, Hearing-aid, Defibrillator, E-mail, Rolled Toilet paper, Printing press, Anesthesia, Zipper, Supermarket, Chemotherapy, Nylon, Fiberglass, Solar cell, Cell phones, Cash register, Napalm, Fast food, barbed-wire, Gas masks, jeans, Radiocarbon dating, Micro-processors, Coca-Cola, traffic lights, MRI machine, Compact Disc, Lunar module, artificial hearts, HPV vaccine, and Bone Marrow transplants.--Also I'm fairly certain the Machine gun, was invented in the United States, both the hand cranked Gatling gun and the automatic maxim Gun.---The EU has the highest GDP in the world.You're comparing 1 Nation to 47 nations.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Atomic bombThe Manhattan Project was an international effort comprising 30 research sites across the U.S, Canada and Britain. The entire affair would have been impossible without Dalton's atomic theory (English) and the discovery of the Neutron by James Chadwick. The AirplaneThe first fixed-wing aircraft was French and aerodynamics was invented by Sir George Cayley, who was English. RadarThe first functioning RADAR system was created by an American named Robert Page, but the theory, the first demonstration of radio waves, and the first employment of radar were European.Assembly lineImpossible without the manufactory, which was an English invention.Personal ComputersWell, we invented the computer, so we'll call that one a joint effort.E-mailWe invented the World Wide Web.Rolled Toilet paperWe have the flushing toilet.Printing pressThe press was German; a man by the name of Johannes Gutenberg. Solar cell, Cell phones, Cash register, Radiocarbon dating, Micro-processors, traffic lights, MRI machine, Compact Disc, Lunar module, artificial hearts,All of which are entirely useless or non-functional without the electrical generator, which was ours.Also I'm fairly certain the Machine gun, was invented in the United States, both the hand cranked Gatling gun and the automatic maxim Gun.The puckle gun outdates both. Maxim was born in the United States, but lived in Britain, which is where he was educated and invented the maxim gun. You're comparing 1 Nation to 47 nations.I'm comparing them to one nation composed of 51 states, most of which are larger than any European country.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

The Manhattan Project was an international effortNonsense! "In 1939 U.S. scientists urged Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt to establish a program to study the potential military use of fission, and $6,000 was appropriated. By 1942 the project was code-named Manhattan, after the site of Columbia University, where much of the early research was done. Research also was carried out at the University of California and the University of Chicago. In 1943 a laboratory to construct the bomb was established at Los Alamos, N.M."http://www.answers.com/topic/manhattan-project  It was funded by US tax dollars. Research, construction, and testing all occurred in the United states. That some foreign scientists aided the project does not make it an international effort.The first fixed-wing aircraft was French and aerodynamics was invented by Sir George Cayley, who was English.And yet the first successful aircraft ever built was built by the Wright brothers in North Carolina. This is undeniable.The first functioning RADAR system was created by an American named Robert Page, but the theoryExcept we aren't talking about theories, we are talking about inventions. And this invention came from the United states.Impossible without the manufactory, which was an English invention.Which in no way makes it NOT an American invention. I could just as easily use the same tactic to undermine most of your English inventions.Well, we invented the computer, so we'll call that one a joint effort.You could call it that, but you'd be wrong. Personal Computers, were developed by an American, to put the power of computers into anybody's home.We invented the World Wide Web.And we invented the Internet....and yes there is a difference.We have the flushing toiletGood luck using it without TP.The press was German; a man by the name of Johannes Gutenberg.Excuse me, I meant to say the Rotary Printing Press, which was invented by Richard m. Hoe, an American.All of which are entirely useless or non-functional without the electrical generator, which was oursWhich would have been useless without the discovery of electricity. See, two can play at that game, yes?Nearly every invention is based on some previous invention, innovation, or scientific discovery. I could break any invention down to it's fundamental parts, and attribute those discoveries to other nations, but this does nothing to dispute the fact that these were in fact American discoveries, things we use everyday.The puckle gun outdates both.The Puckle gun was nothing more than an oversized revolver and what a glorious failure that was! I'm comparing them to one nation composed of 51 states, most of which are larger than any European countryMaybe so, but the EU is not a nation.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Nonsense!By what novel historical insight you contrive to label this truth nonsense, I cannot conceive.That some foreign scientists aided the project does not make it an international effort.The means by which a nation devises new technologies is intelligence coupled with science. To state that the origin of that intelligence and its education are impartial to the intellectual ownership of an invention is ridiculous.And yet the first successful aircraft ever built was built by the Wright brothers in North Carolina.From what I understand, the French aircraft flew successfully. The means may have been a horse tied to the vehicle, but it was flight nonetheless.Except we aren't talking about theories, we are talking about inventions.To invent the functional concept of RADAR is to invent RADAR. Building one is entirely separate.Which in no way makes it NOT an American invention.The means of running a factory efficiently is not a tangible invention. You have taken RADAR based on the first construction of a RADAR device, yet now you abandon that principle?And we invented the Internet....and yes there is a difference.I am aware of the difference. The email would be useless to 99% of the world's population without a public internet.Good luck using it without TP.That wasn't really an issue for the billions of people to have lived before 1857. Besides, we made moist toilet paper, which is far more hygienic and... refreshing. Nearly every invention is based on some previous invention, innovation, or scientific discovery. I could break any invention down to it's fundamental parts, and attribute those discoveries to other nationsRendering this entire childish pissing contest obsolete.The Puckle gun was nothing more than an oversized revolver and what a glorious failure that was!Irrelevant. Maybe so, but the EU is not a nation.A nation is merely a group of people bound together by a common trait; such as coming form Europe. It is not a state or a country, but it equates to the U.S federation in terms of the resources available to it.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

I agree with all your points, but please stop tagging your arguments as USA.