azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Why are you making up a fake comparison instead of arguing the ACTUAL topic? Again: I SUPPORT gun rights. I am pro-2nd amendment.And again: Do you recognize that paying for birth control would save this country MONEY? Or are you just against it on principal, regardless of the utility of the matter?And why do you keeping calling me a hypocrite when it doesn't make sense? I am failing to see how you think that word is defined.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Population growth is at an alarming rate that poses innumerable threats to the economy and ecology. The government should do whatever to help push prevention methods. It's not a mere matter of personal responsibility, it is a global crisis that needs to be dealt with carefully.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Germany and the Nazi's had similar mind sets when they deemed the Jewish people being a burden on their society so their answer was the holocaust. I'm sure you are for forcing tax payers to fund abortions through medicaid, etc. If you are so afraid of population growth, start your own free birth control condom banks for the people ok? I mean gee, a condom costs a whole dollar or free in most places. NAHHH, YOU WANT TO FORCE OTHERS TO PAY FOR YOUR BIRTH CONTROL AND ABORTIONS.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

"Germany and the Nazi's had similar mind sets when they deemed the Jewish people being a burden on their society so their answer was the holocaust." Wow. That is so, SO far off. The Nazi's believed the Jews had TOO much power, and TOO much wealth, and that they were taking advantage of the German people. Which is the exact opposite of the poorly done comparison you made.And you will be paying, indirectly or directly, for the repercussions one way or another. If you are proactive, you will pay less. If you are reactive, you will pay more. You can pitch a fit if you want, but the societal cost will remain, be it through government action, or through social repercussions (crime, unemployment, etc).
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I'm sure you are for forcing tax payers to fund abortions through medicaid, etc.I am not a big fan of abortion either, but making it illegal is one of the worst solutions. Abortion made illegal just goes underground where it is more dangerous. The right solution is to make prevention extremely accessible to everyone, and to boost sex education. Sex ed is disastrous right now. I didn't take sex ed until I was 17, and it was one class about 30 minutes long. If you are so afraid of population growth, start your own free birth control condom banks for the people ok? I mean gee, a condom costs a whole dollar or free in most places. NAHHH, YOU WANT TO FORCE OTHERS TO PAY FOR YOUR BIRTH CONTROL AND ABORTIONS. We already have a system where people can decide to create condom banks for people, and as you can tell it isn't working.Germany and the Nazi's had similar mind sets when they deemed the Jewish people being a burden on their society so their answer was the holocaust.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Hmmmm, so your argument is that making abortions illegal would take it underground where some women might accidentally die? So you have no problem with the MILLIONS of Babies being killed every year. That's your reasoning?You do realize that the GOP only wants laws to prevent abortions on demand past five months(unless life of mother)? If you say you are not a big fan of abortions, you should support this correct?I always get a laugh at people who say they are not big fans of abortions, or they say they are personally against abortions for themselves, etc. etc. etc. blah blah blah.... tell me, why are these people not big fans of or personally opposed to abortion if it is not killing an innocent living growing human being. Ask yourself why you are not big fan of abortions. If the answer is because you know it is killing another living human being, HOW ON EARTH COULD YOU SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF OTHERS TO KILL INNOCENT HUMAN BEINGS?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

"Hmmmm, so your argument is that making abortions illegal would take it underground where some women might accidentally die? So you have no problem with the MILLIONS of Babies being killed every year. That's your reasoning?" You don't seem to realize that people have different beliefs on when life begins. Many don't think that a zygote is a life."You do realize that the GOP only wants laws to prevent abortions on demand past five months(unless life of mother)? If you say you are not a big fan of abortions, you should support this correct?" Some in the GOP only want that, others want to outlaw abortion ENTIRELY."I always get a laugh at people who say they are not big fans of abortions, or they say they are personally against abortions for themselves, etc. etc. etc. blah blah blah.... tell me, why are these people not big fans of or personally opposed to abortion if it is not killing an innocent living growing human being. Ask yourself why you are not big fan of abortions. If the answer is because you know it is killing another living human being, HOW ON EARTH COULD YOU SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF OTHERS TO KILL INNOCENT HUMAN BEINGS?" Again, because people have different beliefs regarding human life. You need to get that through your head.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

If you want to understand the GOP read their intellectuals. I really doubt that the GOP, who has as its main intellectual Ayn Rand, is going to be a big anti-abortion pusher. I mean, have you read The Virtue of Selfishness? That's who Rand Paul is named after.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

If only it could be ........
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Yes.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Birth control should be free With all the greed in this world, a budget for free birth control is not only necessary because of rape, experimentation of sexuality (aka human nature) and any other miscellaneous reasoning to one's bennefit, but plausible to women and society. How? Let me tell you. For one rape happens every few minutes, this means children are accidentally conceived, the solution is birth control. You can not control human nature either, sex is going to happen, birth control should be available the moment a girl gets her period. Complain all you want about where your money goes. You have no idea where your money even does go, do it for a good cause. Stop being greedy. Do not even call me greedy for a second because I am only worrying about us women and what benefits us, you should too.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I think birth control should be free for those who can't afford it.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

How about abstinence...*
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

No it should be controlled because resourced are getting over and people are suffering in poverty
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

I can see it coming a mile away! Liberals declaring that a woman has a constitutional right to have a cock put in her vagina without a condom attached and without risk of pregnancy. Therefore, she has a right to free birth control pills or any other method she so desires. It is a privacy issue after all, just like abortion.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Personally I'm on the pill because it stops my periods and allows me to concentrate on studying, not being in a ridiculous amount of pain. And yes, I get it for free because contraceptives are free on the NHS and I don't pay for prescription being a full time student. Talking about people that actually have sex, condoms (which are also birth control) break. People get drunk and forget them, and if a child is produced the state has to pay out for education, child support or quite likely their care home.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I'm guessing that in your opinion BC pills should be free. The reasons being that you want to avoid menstrual pain (which can be severe in some some women) plus the pill provides better protection than condoms. Further the pill provides protection in case someone makes two poor decisions at the same time (drunken sex). I agree that those are significant benefits, but I'm failing to understand why you believe taxpayers should provide them to you at their expense. :-/
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Because most tax revenues are disposable income ?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Well that's incorrect: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable anddiscretionary_income
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

I didn't mean "disposable" in the technical sense, just that the income could easily spared.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

If tax revenue were so easily spared by the tax payer, why do you suppose hundreds of millions of people work vary hard to avoid paying taxes?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Who actually WANTS to pay for things if they have to, Daver? Not just taxes, ANYTHING.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Returning to the posted topic and my comment: Tax money is not extra cash that people have lying around. It is money they pay to provide for the essential functions of government. Quite clearly for the common good.When governments start dispensing, so called free things to individuals, a line is crossed that leads to unfairness, misuse, division, mistrust. Virtually all of the division and ranker that currently beset the US government, pitting citizen against citizen, is rooted in this overextending of governments essential role.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I think most people actually do want to pay for things. Most people would feel bad for stealing or mooching. With taxes, people feel they are not getting a value equivalent to what they pay. There's a big difference between taxes other forms of payment.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Basically what GenericName said was succinct, but additionally I'm guessing that most tax obligated citizens who go out of their way to pay taxes (to the point of breaking the law) wouldn't collectively contribute more than a percent of our revenues.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Yes, people CHOOSE to get drunk and then have a ludicrous excuse to do stupid irresponsible things. I never got drunk when I was young..... gee how is that possible? According to those on the Left there is no fault for anything people choose to do. That's the problem with this sickening new age political correct drivel.Idiots tell people that alcoholism is a disease and no one's fault. What a crock! If that person chose not to drink too much, he would have never become an alcoholic. No fault!They tell everyone it's not your fault when you choose to have sex with losers who would never be a father to their child, and when you get pregnant you run down to the tax payers to bail you out. No fault!You choose to buy houses you could never afford and the Government blames the banks.... No fault!This left wing America is a dead man walking. The no fault ideology will be the death to this nation. We will die from within. No foreign power needed.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

You are an incredibly angry individual, FromWithin. Like incredibly so.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

You know it is incredibly hard not to use the name fool with you. But I'm trying. Hey wait a minute, I will just call you an incredibly angry person and in your self absorbed world it is not an insult. That's a nice thing to say to someone. Insults hurt people, but calling them an incredibly angry person is a kind uplifting thing to say.Yes I do know what the word hypocrite means.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Can you explain how calling someone angry is insulting?I'll admit it is no compliment, but considering how you spend your time on this website screaming at people, or about people, I fail to see how pointing out the overwhelming amount of negativity emanating from your posts constitutes an insult.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I've never been drunk either. (I've had a small amount of alcohol and suddenly became terrified of all the extra attention I was having to put into walking and started drinking ridiculous amounts of water and eating bitter things (like willow bark, or instant coffee granules))I just accept that there are some things I don't understand. The desire to be drunk one of them, probably because I'm a control freak. I do know however that 'young' people get drunk and end up doing stupid things like sleeping with other people without contraception. I do know that people can get addicted to alcohol and that addiction is very hard to break. In the UK, when industries like fishing and steel collapse, the rise in unemployment brings a rise in alcoholism as the people turn to drink because their livelihoods have been taken away. I have yet to understand the amount of pain someone must feel in order to give their life away to a drug. Of course this has nothing to do with the party culture (of which my experience is zero) which this is all about, off track, off track. I can only guess at why people start drinking so much informally: thinking that they know better, overestimating their capacity to drink, competition, conformity? Of course it's their fault that they drink too much. But let's face it. They're citizens of a state and the state has to look after its citizens. It can't just say 'ah, do what you want, what do I care anyway?', it has to look at ways to alter culture to ensure safety and reduce expenditure. The citizens are the country.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

That is the typical answer to no fault Liberals who basically say, some people will do stupid irresponsible things and therefore we will force others to pay for the consequences.Do you have a clue how damaging that kind of bleeding heart thinking has been to this nation?Imagine if we used that same type of reasoning to things hypocrite Liberals are against. Lets use your reasoning and put it into action for those who do stupid things such as getting drunk and driving. Are you against laws that say getting drunk is no excuse for drunk driving because you are taking a chance you might harm others. But I thought you said getting drunk and doing stupid things is not something to condemn. You say "They're citizens of a state and the state has to look after its citizens". Hmmmmmmm..... does choosing to get drunk, sleeping with an idiot dead beat who would probably abandon his child, taking the chance of getting pregnant, etc. harm others? Yes it harms that child who never asked to be fatherless and never asked to live a demeaning life of welfare, living off charity from others. It hurts the tax payers and society as a whole when they are forced to support the mother and child. But in your world, that analogy does not resonate.How about when someone gets drunk and then sets a Forrest on fire by accident. Not his fault right? We won't condemn him or fine him will we? Not his fault?.... people do stupid things don't you know? Another analogy that just does not resonate with Liberal thinking. People such as yourself have no problem forcing accountability for those types of things but when it comes to sex or drugs or drinking irresponsibly, etc. you say let them be, don't shame them, they are citizens of the state don't you know?Liberals are so quick to judge and punish those who dare break their rules, but choosing to get drunk, having irresponsible sex, living off the tax payers and sentencing an innocent child to a lousy life is no one's fault. We will say and do nothing about it.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I didn't say once that getting drunk wasn't someone's fault. Indeed, I said the exact opposite. What you seem to disagree with is that there are situations that make it more likely for people to drink: like unemployment, poor education etcetera. You seem to like stereotyping and ignore anything that doesn't fit in the little boxes. People are like electrons. They bounce around and do their own thing but they can be directed and controlled. When creating electronic devices, engineers try to make them as efficient as possible by reducing any resistance.In many parts of the world access to birth control is a barrier. It is a barrier to women's equality and health. It is a barrier to the growth of the country. In developed countries access to birth control is also important. $20 a week is a lot of money. Condoms can be expensive, although if condoms were not available free I think more competition would drive the price down. The economic argument is simple. If free birth control encourages more people to use it, the state does not have to spend as much money and the people also have more disposable income which is good for the economy. About the whole drunk thing, a lot of people get drunk regularly. The intelligence of their choice is not the subject of this debate. If a woman gets drunk and ends up sleeping with some random guy while on the pill: no pregnancy, no abortion, or no child in care. Or maybe she slept with her boyfriend, or even husband. Whoever it was, if she got pregnant and couldn't afford to keep another child the outcome is the same.EDIT: Do you care so little for debating that you copy and paste your arguments?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

If free birth control encourages more people to use it, the state does not have to spend as much money and the people also have more disposable income which is good for the economy. That argument is based, not only on the assumption that government should take on the responsibility of shielding citizens from the consequences of their poor decisions, but also that the government should take a step that encourages poor decision making. I reject these assumptions as invalid.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Humans will always make bad decisions. We as a society can either choose to say "Well they shouldn't!", or we can try to mitigate the effect of said mistakes. The first choice accomplishes nothing, short of making certain people feel better about themselves, while the other will save society time and money.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Everybody makes stupid decisions. Some people get drunk. Other people refuse completely to walk the same way back as they came causing them to get hopelessly lost in the middle of the night (that would be me). I don't see how the pill encourages poor decisions. It doesn't remove all the consequences of sleeping with someone without a condom. It only removes 1 possible consequence.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

One very important consequence don't you agree. The main, the important, one everyone is worried about consequence.But that's enough off topic.Why is is right, why is it proper, why is it even a good idea for the government to take someone else's money and spent it, not on national defense, not on building roads, not for the common good, but instead so you can study more comfortably?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

I think that dangerous STI's such as AIDS are a million times more worrying than pregnancy. The emotional consequences can also be pretty harsh for some people and there are social consequences to consider also. Some people regard their reputation as more important than anything.It wasn't a matter of being able to study 'comfortably' it was being able to study at all. I took time off school when I was on my period because of the pain being such a huge distraction that I would not be able to understand what is normally either easy or slightly challenging. It isn't my fault that I'm female or that I had overly painful periods and this clearly put me at a disadvantage for a few years. If not just one, but many, students are incapable of using +/-25% of their government-funded schooling time effectively, is this not a bad thing? For me, it was up to 1 week off school a month incapable of studying when it was at its worst. Painkillers would last up to an hour and then I would have to last another 3 hours before I could take another.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Yes I understand the pain, and I'm truly sorry that you suffer in such a way. In my long life I have met many women that experience painful periods.Your topic is Should birth control be free?Your meaning is should the taxpayer buy "The Pill" and give it to people who want to have sex without getting pregnant. Your justification is that in doing so the government is avoiding future cost.By this logic does it not follow that the government should provide drugs to addicts as a means to prevent future crime. Or perhaps provide jobs for everyone to prevent poverty that also can lead to crime. What of providing education at all junior colleges as Obama has just proposed here in the US.I say NO. Government entitlement programs are largely failures in terms of providing for the common good.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

"By this logic does it not follow that the government should provide drugs to addicts as a means to prevent future crime. Or perhaps provide jobs for everyone to prevent poverty that also can lead to crime. What of providing education at all junior colleges as Obama has just proposed here in the US." No, that does not follow at all. It SHOULD provide addicts with rehabilitation programs, and legalize and regulate drugs to at least harmful substances being on the market.And why not junior colleges? If not junior colleges, why high school?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

How else are things to get done?Is there evidence that top-down restructuring does not work?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

What a laugh, no response to the entire point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Drunk driving????????????????Are you ok with drunk driving being against the law? Or is it ok since they got drunk and did not know what they were doing. In your lunatic reasoning, they could be in situations that make them more likely to drink, like unemployment, poor education, etc.Not their fault right? Tell that to the mother whose child was killed by a drunk driver. Or better yet, tell that to the child born with no father after that drunken one night stand.Do you EVER look at your positions and think to yourself... I'm live in a world of double standards and therefore am a moron.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Are you ok with drunk driving being against the law? Or is it ok since they got drunk and did not know what they were doing. In your lunatic reasoning, they could be in situations that make them more likely to drink, like unemployment, poor education, etc.Drink driving is against the law. Therefore, if someone drinks and drives they are guilty of an offence. If they have had a difficult life that creates a strong tendency to drink, not present in others, then this is used as mitigation in sentencing. What part of that don't you understand angry man?
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Drunk driving has nothing to do with birth control so I did not address it. I try to keep on track... I try.Since when did I say that it was not their fault! Read my previous argument because I'm not repeating myself! (Which applies to your entire argument)
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: No

Time to ignore you. You are not that stupid to know exactly what I am saying and you refused to address it.If getting drunk can not be an excuse for drunk driving(because it is not), then it CAN NOT BE AN EXCUSE FOR GETTING PREGNANT AND LIVING OFF THE TAX PAYER.
Debate: Should birth control be free?
Side: Yes

Ah, do I really have to repeat myself? I made 2 points.One is that getting drunk is your own fault.Another is that the government has the power to mitigate the consequences of getting drunk, or to prevent people from drinking so much they lose control.These points address your entire argument about any occasion of getting drunk and doing something stupid because they are largely generalised.