azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

My preferred source is the CDC. It's easy and accessable.Your constant appeals to authority are typical but you never really check what your sources say for example you brushed off gun injures as being not important yet there are on average 40,000 gun deaths through accident and 84,000 gun injuries yearly (CDC)You don’t formulate beliefs on the basis of evidence you do exactly what the religious do as in become more in entrenched in your beliefs which are not tethered to realityThis is a common phenomenon amongst people like you as facts don’t change minds quite the opposite in fact as you cleary demonstrate , theres some excellent literature on this phenomenon of which you’re an excellent example I didn't say anything about protecting my family. I don't know why you keep saying that. Really? You clearly stated ..... Right, I carry mine because safety cannot be assured outside my home. You carry a gun for safety,A prime example again of your cognitive dissonance.Your safety and family’s cannot be guaranteed outside the home and you want to be an asset to your family but it’s not about protecting you or your family .......Vintage Amarel speak it’s utter bullshit and as I keep saying you’re the only person I know who can hold two totally opposed positions at the same time and think himself rationalI said without a gun I am less of an asset to others.Owning a gun for protection and feeling perfectly safe are not a contradiction.Yes you cannot protect them I get that. Yes you said you need a gun for safety and to protect your family as in they see you carrying as an “asset”Also if you felt just as safe without it why have one? Furthermore, your admission that this is your experience of Americans makes my point that Americans do not need to own guns to feel safe. They simply feel safe and own a lot of guns.My experience of living amongst Americans is that everyone of them I’ve ever asked “why do you own a gun “ have replied for protection when then asked what sort of protection and where number one answer is home protection every stat and source gives this as the main reason until the stats and sources are subjected to Amarel speak When one then says “so you need a gun to feel totally protected in your home” that’s when the tap dance begins as in a total denial of having a gun to feel safe ,it’s the very same dance religious nuts do and it’s a total mental disengagement from the facts as the reality of the matter is denied just to crow “ I’m right you’re wrong “ normally accompanied by such bullshit as “ how do you stop government tyranny without guns” etc ,etc If Americans keep telling us all how wonderful America is and how progressive it is how do guns make a society progressive?
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

There were 454 unintentional gun deaths in 2018. There were 18,921 unintentional non-lethal gun injuries in 2018. The top link is to CDC's WISQARS for death and the second bus for injury.https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html https://wisqars-viz.cdc.gov:8006/non-fatal/home I don't buckle up because I live in fear of collision. I don't lock my doors out of paranoia. I've never been afraid my car would be stolen, but I've never left the keys in it. And of course, I don't carry a gun because I feel unsafe without it.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

I don't buckle up because I live in fear of collision.You buckle up to feel safe , you carry a gun to fell safe and make your family feel safe you’ve admitted this , you’re exactly like a religious nut in your style of argumentation  I don't lock my doors out of paranoia. I never said it was out of paranoia , you do it to feel secure and you have several guns as you admit to “bolster “ that feeling I've never been afraid my car would be stolen, but I've never left the keys in it. Yet you’re afraid your family could be threatened which is why you claim your an asset with a gun Your constant red herrings , piss poor analogies and deflections are boring And of course, I don't carry a gun because I feel unsafe without it Warning ⚠️ ⛔️ Amarel -speak incoming ...... I don't carry a gun because I feel unsafe without it .......yet you claim .... I carry mine because safety cannot be assured outside my home. Yes you feel safer with it you keep saying it but denying it , your comments predictably are totally irrational there are on average 40,000 gun deaths through accident and 84,000 gun injuries yearly (CDC)
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

Just to reiterate..... there are on average 40,000 gun deaths through accident and 84,000 gun injuries yearly (CDC)Putting CDC at the end of your sentence doesn't make it accurate. I provided the link so that you can see what the CDC day actually says. You'll find it matches my numbers, not yours.there are on average 40,000 gun deaths through accident and 84,000 gun injuries yearly (CDC)Visit the CDC data visualiser that I links to and you'll find that accidental gun deaths are typically under 500. The average non-fatal accidental gun injury was under 20,000 between 2007 and 2018.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Your still doing your usual trying to narrow the stats down Take gun deaths including accidents and suicides hows that work for you?You live in a very violent society this you admit posting stats from various sources only continue to make my point
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

There were 454 unintentional gun deaths in 2018. I already covered that.Idk why you want me to include suicides. My suicide is not hazard to others, regardless of how I do it. Nonetheless, let's talk about suicide. Guns are the preferred method of suicide in the US, accounting for just over 50% of all suicides in 2018. But what about suicide as a percentage of gun deaths? Well, suicide accounted for 61.5% of all gun deaths in 2018. Wow! It turns out that our problem with guns is more of a suicide problem rather than a murder problem. With all these guns, the US must have terrible suicide rates compared to other countries, right? Not according to worldpopulationreview.com. With all their gun laws, civilized countries like France, Japan, and South Korea couldn't get their suicide rates below that of the US. If the US had Japan's gun laws, would we have Japan's suicide rate? Of course not. That's because suicide rates are not dependant on gun laws. But thanks for bringing it up.I know I live in a violent society Jody. Thats a reason to have a gun, in addition to them being fun. But it's a big country so I want to make sure we are clear about American violence. It's not widespread. More than half of our murders occur in just 2% of our counties. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/most-murders-occurred-in-5-percent-of-countys-says/
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

There were 454 unintentional gun deaths in 2018. I already covered that.From 2006-2016, almost 6,885 people in the U.S. died from unintentional shootings. In 2016 alone, there were 495 incidents of accidental firearm deaths.https://www.aftermath.com/content/accidental-shooting-deaths-statistics/ Accidental gun deaths occur mainly to those under 25 years old. In 2014, 2,549 children (age 0-19) died by gunshot and an additional 13,576 were injuredhttps://www.aftermath.com/content/accidental-shooting-deaths-statistics/ Guns are the preferred method of suicide in the US, accounting for just over 50% of all suicides in 2018.It is so easy and painless to commit suicide with a a gun, that people who would not ordinarily have committed suicide in fact do so because they have access to firearms.But what about suicide as a percentage of gun deaths? Well, suicide accounted for 61.5% of all gun deaths in 2018.Stop treating statistics like a pick and mix section you utter clown. Why not mention that the US has the 34th highest rate of suicide out of all the countries on Earth? It has the highest rate of suicide per person of ALL the developed countries, with the sole exceptions of Belgium, Japan and Sweden.I think we both know why you don't mention things like this. These statistics are inconvenient for your absurd narrative that guns are safe if people only use them to shoot themselves instead of each other.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

There were 454 unintentional gun deaths in 2018. I already covered that.Idk why you want me to include suicides. My suicide is not hazard to others, regardless of how I do it. Nonetheless, let's talk about suicide.Hint : because they are a gun death Guns are the preferred method of suicide in the US, accounting for just over 50% of all suicides in 2018. But what about suicide as a percentage of gun deaths? Well, suicide accounted for 61.5% of all gun deaths in 2018.Wow! It turns out that our problem with guns is more of a suicide problem rather than a murder problem.With all these guns, the US must have terrible suicide rates compared to other countries, right? Not according to worldpopulationreview.com. With all their gun laws, civilized countries like France, Japan, and South Korea couldn't get their suicide rates below that of the US.If the US had Japan's gun laws, would we have Japan's suicide rate? Of course not. That's because suicide rates are not dependant on gun laws. But thanks for bringing it up.Your constant juggling of stats and data is hilarious and is totally irrelevant to my original commentary which was you live in a very violent society which you admit , you need a gun for safety your wife needs mace which you admit ( kids not known preferred method ) so what are you arguing again? I know I live in a violent society Jody. Yes Thats a reason to have a gun, Yes in addition to them being fun. For a sportsman / woman but again that’s irrelevant But it's a big country so I want to make sure we are clear about American violence. It's not widespread. More than half of our murders occur in just 2% of our But again that’s deflection as we have to take in all gun incidents into account which I think you have conceded is a huge problem and the reason your country is rated one of the most violent on the planet
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

Did you know that 38 of the 59 States are larger than Ireland? When 2% of the counties in the US account for half the murder, it's worth noting. I'm happy to focus on national level statistics, but there's a reasonable explanation why most Americans feel their society is safe. Because for most Americans it is. Especially in rural America where murder is low and gun ownership is high (I'm not arguing this is causal).
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Did you know that 38 of the 59 States are larger than Ireland? Yes , also I lived in the states for many years and I enjoyed it , I lived in LA (Santa Monica) When 2% of the counties in the US account for half the murder, it's worth noting. I'm happy to focus on national level statistics, but there's a reasonable explanation why most Americans feel their society is safe. Because for most Americans it is. Especially in rural America where murder is low and gun ownership is high (I'm not arguing this is causal).Yet as I stated before every American I’ve met has when asked why they own a gun has told me for protection , I deal with Americans daily over here and they are astonished that as a society we abhor the notion of citizens carrying guns and equally amazed when they see cops without PEWWhile many gun owners say they have more than one reason for owning a firearm, 67% cite protection as a major reason. About four-in-ten gun owners (38%) say hunting is a major reason, and 30% cite sport shooting. Smaller shares cite a gun collection or their job as major reasons.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Guns are the preferred method of suicide in the US, accounting for just over 50% of all suicides in 2018.They are also the preferred method of homicide in the US, used in 75 percent of homicides. Guns are used three times more often to kill other people than the grand total of all other weapons combined.Guns are very good at killing things, Amarel. That is why they are popular when you want to kill something. Whether that something is yourself or someone else doesn't matter in the goddamned slightest. Suicides are yet another red herring with no relevance to any conversation about the safety of guns.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Wow! It turns out that our problem with guns is more of a suicide problem rather than a murder problem.No Amarel. It turns out you are simply playing pick and mix with statistics again. You were very keen to tell us that guns are used in 50 percent of suicides in the US, but of course you did not mention that they are also used in 75 percent of homicides!!!!
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

He had just accused me of ignoring suicide smart guy, so that's what I talked about.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

He had just accused me of ignoring suicide smart guy, so that's what I talked about.I didn’t “accuse “ you of anything , I asked you a question as in ......Take gun deaths accidents and suicides hows that work for you?
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Only about 30% of American adults own a gun.You have been told repeatedly to include sources when you make claims, and yesterday you were criticising Jody for not doing exactly that. What you are Amarel is a joke. Your sneering hypocrisy is just a simple laughing matter.The Small Arms Survey stated that U.S. civilians alone account for 393 million (about 46 percent) of the worldwide total of civilian held firearms. This amounts to "120.5 firearms for every 100 residents."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GunownershipSo almost half of the private gun owners in the entire world live in America and there are more guns in America than there are people. And it gets even crazier:-The world's armed forces control about 133 million (approximately 18 percent) of the global total of small armshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GunownershipSo US citizens have three times more guns than all the armies in the world combined.Finally, I found your source, and quite predictably you are distorting the findings. Americans were asked whether they own a gun. Thirty two percent of them said yes. Your claim arbitrarily eliminates the possibility that any of them lied. You have taken a claim which you cannot be sure is accurate and presented it as though it were a fact.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

The poll is Pew, which is credible. The poll goes on to cover people with multiple firearms, which is quite a few. Relatively few households hold large shares of the firearms and that's how the matter has been discussed for over a decade. A poll that supports that is credible if not perfectly accurate.I personally have 6 for now. And I'm not a gun nut by the standards of my area.  Jody wouldn't even give a quote for what he meant by Trump's incitement. He referenced twitter but couldn't reproduce what they were even referring to. He made an assertion on the authority of someone some why at Twitter and told me to go find it. That's what pissed me off.If I make a data based statement, it most often came from a source I recently consumed. So if I make a data claim, you don't have to go searching for my source, you can ask or even rudely demand. I'll provide it unless I don't have it.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Well, maybe it's 8. I just don't own them all. .
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

If I make a data based statement, it most often came from a source I recently consumed. So if I make a data claim, you don't have to go searching for my source, you can askFuck off Amarel. It is your responsibility to support your claims with evidence, not my responsibility to chase you for it, as you know full well because you were arguing the exact same thing yesterday when the shoe was on the other foot, you completely pointless hypocrite.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

It would make more sense to type "show your source" then to go looking for it yourself.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

The poll is Pew, which is credible. Stop telling me what is and is not credible and start linking the sources from which you derive your claims you persistently dishonest idiot.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

OK, here is the poll:-https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/06/ 22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/ This is what the poll says:-Three-in-ten American adults say they currently own a gunThis is what you changed it to:-30 percent of Americans own a gunYou don't link the stuff you source because nine out of every ten times you are misrepresenting the source somehow, and you don't want to increase the chances of someone finding out.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

Which I changed to "only about 30%" because I don't presume precision in surveys. That's not a misrepresentation of what the source says. And it's consistent with what I've heard for years
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

Which I changed to "only about 30%" because I don't presume precision in surveys.The issue is not that you weren't precise. The issue is that you deliberately omitted the word "say" from the poll's vocabulary and hence misrepresented something as a fact which is not necessarily a fact.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

nine out of every ten times you are misrepresenting the source somehowI couldn't find anything on this stat. What's your source?
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

For the record, I am inclined to agree that surveys are a somewhat poor data source. And I doubt that this survey covered the significant number of households with illegal guns. Nonetheless, for certain kinds of data, only a survey will do. And if the survey is supported over time or by other metrics, it's more likely to be more accurate.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

For the record, I am inclined to agree that surveys are a somewhat poor data source.If you agree then why did you use a survey as your data source, and then try to obfuscate that fact by failing to even link it? That's essentially an admission of bias.And I doubt that this survey covered the significant number of households with illegal guns.Exactly. People lie for all sorts of reasons. They also frequently misunderstand questions. For example, you might legitimately ask someone if they own a gun, and they might say no on the grounds that they own five. As stupid as that sounds, I guarantee you it happens.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: This is wrong

As I explained, surveys often present some information that cannot be gotten through "harder" scientific means. While the info is imprecise and sometimes problematic, it is better than a guess.Nom, anyone who doesn't admit to bias is lying at least to themselves.
Debate: Where are you Republicans?
Side: No it's cool

As I explained, surveys often present some information that cannot be gotten through "harder" scientific means.You don't explain Amarel. You backtrack and obfuscate. If you were confident that the information you were giving was accurate then there was no reason not to include your source.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

There's many reasons many people from around the world try to immigrate and to become US citizens. Although I'm sure there are some who do that into Russia I bet you it's dwarfed compared to the USA.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Just to give you the figures, it's 1.86 immigrants per 1000 for Russia and 3.89 immigrants per 1000 for the U.S., according to the CIA (which might be a little biased on Russia).
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

I'm surprised it wasn't a wider gap. But at least it supports my argument 2 to 1.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

Russia has more powerful military equipment.Tanks, fighter jets, guns, artillery, better training, you name it.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

You love being wrong.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

You love being wrong.I guess you are a blind patriotic of America then.Have you done any research into the weapons of the USA and Russia?I doubt it.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

I love how the king of making shit up and not doing research is going to lecture anyone on doing research.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

I love how the king of making shit up and not doing research is going to lecture anyone on doing research.Let's start.M1A2SEP lvl two Abrahams vs T-90AM vs T-14 Armata.You decide.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-armata-t-14-tank-vs-americas-m-1-abrams-who-wins-13825 The idea of trying to discuss how two machines with classified specifications would fare makes no sense.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

The idea of trying to discuss how two machines with classified specifications would fare makes no sense.You must debate how the classification system works to make it into sense!You must debate and divide!
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

You still haven't learned to stop letting me decide.The Abrams would win that fight every day and twice on Sunday.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

You still haven't learned to stop letting me decide.Asking you what is your own opinion is giving you the control that you should have.Not the control that you try to have.The Abrams would win that fight every day and twice on Sunday.The Abrams isn't as powerful as people make it out to be.You do realise how many Abrams that the Americans have lost?The Abrams isn't that good, they have lost about 4,000 tanks in the past.We have only lost about 2/3 challenger 2 tanks and have lost none of our Challenger 1's.So the Abrams is definitely inferior to the Challenger 2.But what for the T-14 Armata or the T-90AM?Those tanks are not bad at all.Their new reflekt (that's foreign) explosive reactive armour is actually quite strong, which is in front of a firm, thick base on composite armour.The Abrams may have Chobham armour, but not the second generation of Chobham that the British use (the British use Dorchester), the USA just use an improved version of the original Chobham armour (Burlington).
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Anyone who does will find that the United States is technologically superior both in terms of domestic technological applications and military applications. On top of that, we have a larger pool of active personnel and a substantially higher military budget.Have you done any research on this topic?
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

Anyone who does will find that the United States is technologically superior both in terms of domestic technological applications and military applications. On top of that, we have a larger pool of active personnel and a substantially higher military budget.Have you done any research on this topic?Russia is technologically advanced both in terms of agricultural laboratory practices and military equipment. Russia has a larger base of alert soldiers and a substantially cutting military sharehold.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Russia is technologically advanced both in terms of agricultural laboratory practices and military equipment. In both cases they are less technologically advanced than the United States. Outside of agriculture we are still far beyond Russia in technological advancement. Russia has a larger base of alert soldiers and a substantially cutting military sharehold.Actually they don't.Russia has the 5th largest active pool at 845,000. We are second at 1.5 million. As for "a substantially cutting military sharehold", that combination of words does not result in any actual meaning. If you wrongfully phrased what you meant, feel free to try again. But you might want to check up on your facts before doing so.