azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

well this is beyond sources for the validity of the bible. but there are a few points i can still argue if you wish to put aside the search for proof. i mean obviously if you were interested into God you would just as easily find sources to prove his existence as the argument against it.one the roman empire was strongly anti Christan until later, some time after Nero who was documented for burning Christians alive as candles. but yes later Rome adopted Christianity as its official religion.as for indoctrination, its curious to see what denomination you studied under. for there are many denominations who have other agendas tied to their teachings that are also considered inaccurate to the Christan world, for example jw's, Mormons and so on. and for not worshiping a a all powerful being because they should not require it or is the mark of a Deva i dont agree. God does not require our pray, it is simple pleasing to him. its ultimately a way of talking to him because God explains it is a way of reaching him. as for him wanting conversation making him a Deva is wrong, he wants a relationship with us because he made us. well we can argue more on it later. and heres an other site that could be of interest to explain my stance on things, it is a Christan site arguing for the existence of God with a load of different topics. read if you wish
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

Hi all  when you are talking about history , is NOT what you believe anymore ,it's about what factually took place..... of course you can still believe whatever you wish ,but that doesn't mean what you believe factually took place......please do bear that in mind. the bible cannot even be consistence on its contents and self-contradictory most of the time ,how can you say its accurate ?best regards
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

again have you read the bible? what is not factual about the migration of Hebrews from Egypt to modern day Palestine not be accurate? how is the ancient Israeli state and the history around it about the wars and collapse of ancient Israel not accurate?how is the early history of Christianity in Europe and Asia minor not accurate?
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

Hi all how can god inspired the bible with all the inconsistencies and contradictions because that itself is one big contradiction YHWH ,an absolute being ,inspired such a horrible written book ? even human work like "lord of the rings" is better.see you
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

have you read the bible? please tell me contradictions instead of telling me it is a contradiction. as for lord of the rings, it was written by a Christian and is in some instances a analogy to the bible.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

Hi"have you read the bible? please tell me contradictions instead of telling me it is a contradiction. as for lord of the rings, it was written by a Christian and is in some instances a analogy to the bible."well, an analogy to the bible LOTR ,how is that so?you want Contradictions you have it ,to named a few referring to the resurrection of story of Jesus in all gospels in detail ,none of them are parallelJudas death they are two versionsthe genocide of children of Herod is a fraud because no historical evidence to substantiatelet me give you a geographical contradiction see Lk4:29Nazareth wasn't built 'on/near a cliff' in the first place ,obviously the author/s (YHWH) had poor palestine geographical knowledge. there are more please research & reply with referencesbest regardsenjoy "How well we know ,what profitable superstition this Fable of christhas been for us." Pope Leo X (1513-1521)
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

Hi all the bible is full mistakes even after translations and many wrong translations due the christian own agenda. see you
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"but on the spiritual side of the debate, yes the bible is the ultimate authority on all things and and is completely accurate. being a Christan requires this belief."And you call me ignorant? That's ironic."the history of the life of Jesus and early Christianity come form the bible. whether you believe in the events such as the resurrection of Jesus and all those miraculous events are up to you."There's no conclusive proof that a man named Jesus or Yeshua ever existed and even if he did, the Bible heavily exaggerated his so-called miracles. It takes a very weak-minded individual to blindly believe what you claim is true. In short, it is you who appears to be the ignorant one here. Not to mention bigoted and arrogant.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

you are really ignorant. the life and death of Jesus has been recored by roman executioners, Jewish historians who disliked Jesus, and his numerous disciples. but onto the spiritual part of the debate. how does it take a blind weak mind to believe in God? pleas tell me.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"you are really ignorant"All evidence to the contrary"the life and death of Jesus has been recored by roman executioners, Jewish historians who disliked Jesus, and his numerous disciples."Show me a non-biased source and evidence of your claim."how does it take a blind weak mind to believe in God? pleas tell me."Think of it this way, when you're thinking religiously, you're using the right side of your brain. That's the emotional, creative side. Not the logical, rational side. You're letting your biased, emotional opinions get in the way of your logical thought process. Not only that, but if you just believe in god because your parents told you he existed, and didn't even look further for some valid proof, that's weak. The concept of gods was used by the ancients to try and explain what they didn't understand. Alot of stuff that's actually common knowledge now. Natural disasters, wind, all weather, life, reproduction, etc. To believe in any god now is basically like having an imaginary friend. It's an emotional crutch that you use to try and delude yourself into believing that everything is going to be alright. You have some psychological need to believe in something or someone that will always love you no matter what. Independent and intelligent critical thinkers have no need for an imaginary deity because they're capable of figuring out life's problems and mysteries by themselves. To blindly place your faith in something that only you claim is real just because you may have experienced some personally grand emotional event which you claim to be a "divine miracle" is ridiculous. Not only that, you try and convince others that this all-powerful imaginary being is real and use it to try and explain that of which YOU don't understand or don't have the answers to. I can assure you, we as human beings have the answers, and if we don't have an answer for something, we will in due time. That's how science works. Time to grow up and stop placing your belief in imaginary deities. That, my academically-challenged young friend, is weak minded
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

"Think of it this way, when you're thinking religiously, you're using the right side of your brain. That's the emotional, creative side. Not the logical, rational side. You're letting your biased, emotional opinions get in the way of your logical thought process. Not only that, but if you just believe in god because your parents told you he existed, and didn't even look further for some valid proof, that's weak. The concept of gods was used by the ancients to try and explain what they didn't understand. Alot of stuff that's actually common knowledge now. Natural disasters, wind, all weather, life, reproduction, etc. To believe in any god now is basically like having an imaginary friend. It's an emotional crutch that you use to try and delude yourself into believing that everything is going to be alright. You have some psychological need to believe in something or someone that will always love you no matter what. Independent and intelligent critical thinkers have no need for an imaginary deity because they're capable of figuring out life's problems and mysteries by themselves. To blindly place your faith in something that only you claim is real just because you may have experienced some personally grand emotional event which you claim to be a "divine miracle" is ridiculous. Not only that, you try and convince others that this all-powerful imaginary being is real and use it to try and explain that of which YOU don't understand or don't have the answers to. I can assure you, we as human beings have the answers, and if we don't have an answer for something, we will in due time. That's how science works. Time to grow up and stop placing your belief in imaginary deities. That, my academically-challenged young friend, is weak minded"Show me a non-biased source and evidence of your claim.woah it works both ways, funny isn't?but to the point of your argument. you assume i am using biased emotional unreasoned information to prove the existence of God. well instead of regurgitating what other highly educated theologians said i will instead direct you to some very informing sites about proof for God's existence since we are no longer arguing about the authority of the bible, but of the proof of its author, God.please read these sites, you mention good points in your argument, in fact points most atheist suggest for my faith in "God". so i hope your accusations are answered by these sites.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"i will instead direct you to some very informing sites about proof for God's existence since we are no longer arguing about the authority of the bible, but of the proof of its author, God."The bible has no authority and you can't prove god's existence. He only exists in your mind. There's no denying that. Nor did your god write the bible or anything for that matter. You really are deluded aren't you?
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

"The bible has no authority and you can't prove god's existence. He only exists in your mind. There's no denying that. Nor did your god write the bible or anything for that matter. You really are deluded aren't you?"Again, show me a non biased source to support your claim.for some reason i have to show educated out side sources for my claims while yet your claims i have to assume have authority or proof because you say them?lets debate by the same rules here please. and ill mention an other great site i highly recommend for your numerous questions you have.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

How about this. Instead of having me spoon-feed it to you, why don't you prove yourself capable of independent thought and do the research yourself. Huh? You want answers? Go look for them. I've done my homework. It's time you did the same.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

how bout this. instead of you again offering me no evidence for your claims and then telling me i have to do my homework when i show you i have. you do your homeworkand i don't want answers you do. your the one asking me and arguing against me. then getting angry when i supply you with some. usually the theologian is called narrow minded but you seem to have enough of it for both of us.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

I have done all my homework. How do think I came to the conclusion that there is no god? Guesswork? No. That's your area of expertise. Alot of guesswork. You haven't supplied any answers, here. Merely opinions and perspective guesswork. Seeing as you being the religious extremist you are, your perspective is too emotionally biased and cannot be taken seriously here or elsewhere. In other words, unless you can argue without emotion, your argument is rendered invalid.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

if you have done homework then show me instead of telling me i haven't. and the sites i showed you are not guesses but thought out answers. its up to you to believe if their true or not. and i am not using emotion in my statements. in all reality you seem the most emotional here and for what reason? i can only imagine.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

You should be able to do the research on your own and prove that the religious aren't as lazy as they appear to be. Your perspective is emotional based. That's one of the reasons you believe in a god.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

lol it appears are argument has died down. and it is turning into a i know more than you therefore your wrong. well i do and will continue to do my resarch, aka read the bible daily and such :)
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"it appears are argument has died down."Indeed."and it is turning into a i know more than you therefore your wrong."Unfortunately, yes. This is not true debating nor are we grasping the opportunity to share knowledge and learn from one another. Instead, we're quarreling like a pair of juveniles. "well i do and will continue to do my resarch, aka read the bible daily and such :)"Do as you will. Just don't be afraid to look outside the box. You may not like what you find, but you'll grow from it as a person.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

By the way, I've already seen that site you gave the link to. That doesn't anywhere close to "proof" that your imaginary friend exists. Nice try, though. Try using a real source next time.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"That doesn't anywhere close to "proof" that your imaginary friend exists."I meant to say: That doesn't come anywhere close to "proof" that your imaginary friend exists.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

no sorry about that. i meant to post to sites but they merged into one. heres the other site about non biblical sources of Jesus.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

Hi Hey due its Not yesterday news that the bible is full oF errors ,even more after translations that is excluding the contents ,contexts ,geographical and historical contradictions.well ,surly you would agree that we all can believe anything we want. but what you believe its just "true" to you only ,what's facts may not be what you believe....in addition ,if you still want to believe what's in the bible .well of course you can but remember its with all the errors after translations & with the contents ,contexts ,geographical and historical contradictions as well. so good luckbest regards"How well we know ,what profitable superstition this Fable of christhas been for us." Pope Leo X (1513-1521)
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

I think you responded to the wrong person. I don't believe the bible is truth. In fact, I agree with everything you just pointed out. Happy Thanksgiving.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

It was written and so many peope agree with it and have agreed with it for centuries.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

So... wikiality then?Does the majority agreeing with something make it true?One more thing... how do you know for sure it wasn't written by the prince of lies?
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

"Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. "Men of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know.  That is how we know.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

More people believed the earth was flat, and for a longer time. It did not make it so in retrospect.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

Interesting how the world being flat and the Bible being real has no relevance. Not to mention things in Bible have came true in the past years. When world being flat was proven to be wrong. Yet no one has proven the Bible to be wrong in all these years...hmmmm....
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"Interesting how the world being flat and the Bible being real has no relevance."Actually, they do. See, the bible was written by the very same people who believed the world to be flat and like the bible, that claim was disproved using modern science."things in Bible have came true in the past years"Like what? Those broad-termed prophesies that are open to heavy interpretation?
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

"Actually, they do. See, the bible was written by the very same people who believed the world to be flat and like the bible, that claim was disproved using modern science."They were not the same people because thats a different time. Can you show me the proof that modern science proved that?  "Like what? Those broad-termed prophesies that are open to heavy interpretation?"For one: The regathering of Israel as a nation in the 20th century. "Thus says the Lord God: ' Surely I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, wherever they have gone, and will gather them from every side and bring them into their own land." (Ezekiel 37:21) ['Nations' plural ... this is not their return from Babylon]Some would depart from the faith and go into devil worship-1 Tim 4:1. This is perfect. Reportedly in Great Britain alone, there are about 35,000 professing witches. The Christian church at the time of the end would be lukewarm, neither cold nor hot for Jesus. Prophecy fulfilled.There would be weapons that could destroy the world-Mk 13:20; Rev 6:8; Rev 9:18; Zech 14:8,12. There would be an increase in earthquakes-Mt 24:2,3,7; Mk 13:8; Lk 21:11. This prophecy is correct. That’s 9 out of 9. Note: One might think as the earth settled over a period of time that earthquakes would decrease like ripples in the water. Yet the Bible indicates the opposite is true. In this last generation, research from the U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center reveals that major earthquakes of a magnitude of 6.0 or higher have remained relatively constant during this century. However, the total number of earthquakes in recent years appear to be rising. For example, it was reported that in 1986, the total number of earthquakes was 12,718. In l990, it was 16,612. In 1994, it was 19,371. This will culminate during the Battle of Armageddon, AFTER THE TRIBULATION OF THOSE DAYS. At that time, there will be an earthquake that will shake the world. The cities of the nations will fall. Every island will flee away.There is your proof.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"They were not the same people because thats a different time."Same time period, kid. They're also the same people who believed that constellations were celestial beings. They're the same people that thought that the Sun and the Universe revolved around Earth."This is perfect. Reportedly in Great Britain alone, there are about 35,000 professing witches."Doesn't make them "Devil worshipers". Why would they worship some dark entity that your religion made-up to begin with? Witchcraft is just another form of Wicca which has its roots in Celtic Paganism. It's such a shame you Theists are so easily frightened by that which you don't understand. "There is your proof."That's only proof of how you are so easily manipulated into believing in this ancient Mythology.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

Again no proof. There is no proof that these were the same people and my religion didnt just come up with them. Not to mention what about my other points? So those are valid but some of my points are not? Just shows you again that my religion is real, just like my God is real.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"Just shows you again that my religion is real, just like my God is real."Wrong again. You're mere perspective doesn't make your religion any more valid than the hundreds of others nor does it make your god any more real than the thousands of others that people have believed in just as passionately as you have believed in yours. Your imaginary friend doesn't exist anywhere beyond the right half of your brain (The creative, imaginative side) and there isn't anything you believe in that can prove otherwise.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

But again you have not proven anything which just shows that you obviously cannot come up with proof which means I am right. Your ignorance humors me.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

You yourself take it all upon blind faith and willfully ignore all facts and evidence that contradict your beliefs. Your bigotry humors me.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

So when are you going to provide me with this evidence? I am just going to keep asking for it because again I am winning because you have provided no evidence. Also, I gave you evidence that things in the Bible are coming true which means God is real which means it is not all blind faith.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"I am winning"Being a female Republican, it's not surprising that you would try and dumb down the debate into a childish game and try to declare yourself the victor. "things in the Bible are coming true which means God is real which means it is not all blind faith."Even if these minor coincidences are true, it doesn't prove the existence of your god. Your faith is blind for believing so. Use common sense, sheep.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: yes

Just like you said I was a child because you don't like my beliefs and said I am easily manipulated and called my God an imaginary friend instead of using some different wording. Which shows that you were the one in the first place to act like it was a childish game and dumb down the debate so basically you are calling yourself dumb. I am not angry that you have different beliefs I was merely giving you the proof of what i know to be true. You need to use common sense and maybe read the Bible first to understand all points of view. I have learned of evolution and learned different beliefs and have chose my point of view because it makes the most sense to me. It might not make sense to you and i don't have a problem with that.You are the sheep because you have not broaden your views to different things and haven't tryed to understand them.
Debate: Is the bible 100% true
Side: No

"I am not angry that you have different beliefs"Nor am I. "I was merely giving you the proof of what i know to be true"I wouldn't say it constitutes as proof. It's open to interpretation."read the Bible first to understand all points of view"Being an ex-christian, I did so. That's why I understand it's message, mythology and hypocrisy. I'm not going to debate something without know both perspectives. Otherwise I'd be the hypocrite."because it makes the most sense to me"Ever consider that you're letting your emotional biases get in the way of critical, rational, and logical thinking? That tends to be the case with most religious people."It might not make sense to you and i don't have a problem with that."It makes sense and I understand it perfectly. You don't have all the answers so you take on the religion you were raised upon and conditioned from birth to allow yourself to believe that you do. Based on observation, you need some emotional crutch to get you through life by giving you a false sense of hope. "You are the sheep because you have not broaden your views to different things and haven't tryed to understand them."All evidence to the contrary, my dear.