Debate: Remove "In God We Trust" from pledge and U.S. Currency
Side: No

Lucifer was one of Yahweh's top angelsThat is the key word there: was. Not at the time we are speaking about, at this time he does everything in his power to ruin this world so I think your statement there is totally irrelevant.This is a double-point, because God must have known that Lucifer would rebel and lead humans astray (according to your mythology) when he created him.You don't need to keep reassuring me that you don't believe in God, you are atheist and I get that 100%. Yes, God did know that Lucifer would rebel against Him and attempt to draw humans into dark places. What is your point here?Based on?? A hunch? A gut reaction? Your feeling? Do not think your bald assertions hold weight here.You are making a complete ass of yourself, here is why: you state that offense does not always follow from insults, which implies that it sometimes does (in my opinion, often does), which proves that there is a big chance that the 'insult' verse I included refers to offense. To dispute that will insult my intelligence and will also knock you flat on your asinine atheist ass.Does God's perception of time impair his ability to 'save' mankind?Nope.if NO, then you cannot use it as a reasonSo your plan here is to make me answer 'yes' or 'no' then force me to not supply reason so that you can then go on to diss my lack of reasoning and tell me I am making "bald assertions"? You have got absolutely no idea how to debate do you?No. No, it's not.Thats why I didn't say 'same thing', I said "same difference". You truly are a 90 year old without marbles who shits his pants and can't see without a magnifying glass which you evidently forgot to use which would make sense due to lack of marbles.Based on?? A hunch? A gut reaction? Your feeling?Common sense.Authors you mean.Why thank you for the correction in my error of grammar; if this is how we are playing then perhaps I should scroll through your previous posts and correct several of the errors you typed - oh and by the way it is 'irrelevant', not "irrelevent". Two can play that game, mister smart Alec.It also doesn't follow that because he (Lucifer) is evil, that he is unaware of Yahweh's PowerThat sentence doesn't make sense. Satan is aware of God's power, He was not out to destroy God (as he knew he would be a fool to even think it let alone try) but rather wanting to destroy Job's faith in God.The other example, I've stated many times: the great Deluge.So you are standing on a) a "wager" that Satan lost and b) the flood which God gave everyone a chance to escape but most did not believe him therefore got what they had coming to them which they had a chance to escape. These are really what you use for your back up plan? Surely there is something else you can use...?If you could see the future and never made mistakes, you would never need to fix those mistakes. You wouldn't need an eraser, but that's precisely what the deluge (the flood) is.God knew what would happen, He knew it all. An eraser scrubs out something you don't want. God scrubbed out what didn't want Him. The difference is that your theory is back to front. Perhaps in some ways the flood was an eraser, yes, but what was being scrubbed out had a chance and did not heed the warning. Not God's fault, not the floods fault - theirs.If God knew he was going to have to wipe out humanity and restart with Noah and his wife, then not just start out with Noah and his wife in the first place?We would never know the consequences of disobeying God if He did things like this and our fear for Him would be far smaller.Yet we are told that he cannot sin, cannot deny himself, cannot lie, and cannot create a being greater than himself.Obviously a benevolent being such as God could not do those things; He is omnipotent as Revelation tells us and we know that He can do anything (except lie, sin, deny himself, which is pretty obvious for a benevolent being).