Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

I've said nothing to suggest I follow anything without question. To the contrary, you are the one refuses to open your mind to new ideas just because you didn't personally think of them. There's just no excuse for that level of egoism.No, definitely too much. You're just some kid who thinks he's figured the world out because he's accidental become a communist. I've not asserted it, I've tediously made the case for why money is needed. All money is is a medium of exchange. All this other nonsense is your invention.I know you are a Marxist communist. Nothing else about you is relevant here. You're not mysterious, I can see right through you.You say I small fraction, I say the relevant fraction. Your views on things other than economics don't matter here.You are a Marxist communist. You both deny the necessity of money and believe in a labour theory of value. Both of which have been both theoretically and historically proven wrong.You never answered my question about China. Are they idiots too?You've said it yourself, you don't see any need for money. You are a communist by definition. It's not my invention, it's the political theory you've chosen to live by, intentionally or not.You're both young and lacking mental maturity. You refuse to educate yourselves on even the basics of economics due to laziness and you twist it in your head to convince yourself it's because you don't want to be tainted with knowledge and wisdom or some nonsense like that. You're ignorant of the world. That's nothing to be proud of.I'm not in a box, I have the world of economics and it's history at my disposal to judge and conclude on what works and what doesn't. You are a wilfully ignorant teenager who thinks they're smarter than literally every single contemporary economist simply because they are 'blinded by knowledge'. Absolutely absurd. The ideas you've come up with on your own are wrong. These ideas have been around for almost 200 years now. They've been tried. They've failed. You have nothing going for you here. Do you believe in evolution? Well, that's a predetermined view, so I guess that's a religion too according to you.Your own mind has given you no understanding of the basic of economics, yet you believe you know more about economics than someone with extensive education on the matter. You're a lazy ignoramus kid who can't handle the thought of not automatically being right all the time, but also doesn't want to do any research whatsoever to make sure he is even in the same ballpark as being right. Economics is a highly mathematics field. There is a definitive correct answer to most economic questions. This isn't philosophy. You can't re-invent the wheel here and expect to be taken seriously.having knowledge about economics is absolutely necessary in order to think critically on the topic. If you don't even know about various theories, let alone their tried and proven effects on the market, you may end up, Oh, I don't know, coming up with communism and believing there's nothing wrong with it.But hey, there's a problem with your argument on a more fundamental level. You say I should reject pre-existing theories and instead come up with my own (Which I did, I just wasn't so egotistical as to contend I was the first to think of it when I learned it already existed). The problem with this is that to me, your proto-communist ideas are pre-existing. therefore I cannot adhere to your theory.