Debate: A fetus is just one phase of a human's life.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

So you would allow a woman to kill a human being that relies on her? You mean a potential human in the making ?Yes I would allow her to abort is this not clear to you yet ?. Anti-abortion advocates make the jump from these cells being capable of later on forming a person to the conclusion that these cells are the equivalent of a person. I fail to see how that jump in logic is valid. Let's take away all factors, except for that their's a human and the woman wants to kill it. What you mean is “ let’s insert your particular view”” and attempt to force the issue Is that not murder/manslaughter?No , it’s merely you asserting it is and being wrong again , why is a woman not jailed for this “crime “ if that’s not the case ?You make statements that are incorrect and assume they’re correct because you say so , why’s that ?Why? Her body , her choice Excluding "her body, her choice", Why does that upset you ?because that response is based on nothing other than the response itself.What a bizarre statement the response explains perfectly the woman’s position in the mattersWhat about the father? What about him ?Doesn't he get a say?He does but his wishes are secondary to the woman’s , also I bet he only gets a say if he’s anti abortion isn’t that right ?Or do you believe he also can only make 1 choice ?  What if he doesn't want an abortion? What if he does ? It's his son too, Potential son /daughter actually  and the mother wouldn't be a mother if not for him.So what ? When did I say women shouldn't have any rights over their bodies? Well you wish to deny the woman a right to abort so that’s a denial of her bodily rights ,are you now denying this ? I’ve yet to “ get angry “ I’m amused actually , so tell me is this projection on your part ?You get angryAnd that makes you immoral,Incorrect , I’m perfectly will to allow a woman to carry a child to pregnancy or abort making me a paragon of fairness and morality  saying women can kill their childrenIt’s children now , no longer a “ fetus “ or even a “baby “ your appeal to emotion is “ touching “ but Victorian melodrama does not work with me  without input from the father.Again what if the father wants to abort is that “ input “ equally valid ?Nothing, other than the law considering with abortion you're still killing a potential human.The law does not say that and if your killing a human being why aren’t you jailed for it ?But I see at last you agree with me as you’re now also saying “ a potential human “ So it’s not “ children “ or “babies “ anymore but a “ potential human “ By contraception you mean things like birth control pills, correct?Well done Sherlock  We'll assume that's the focus here. The giveaway was in the term “ contraception “ Contraception is different than abortionQuiet similar actually as both are preventative measures because it stops the potential life from existing in the first placeExactly what abortion does as in stops a potential life from existing . In other words, the fetus doesn't exist. Because you’ve prevented it existing like abortion With abortion, you're ending the fetus' life.You’re preventing it from being born the exact function of contraception, making you a ......hypocrite No, I actually encourage contraception for teens and those who think they don't have the money to raise a child, the same goes for adoption.So you encourage the prevention of a birth because teens and others may not have the money to raise a child , so if a teen gets pregnant why not encourage abortion or does your hypocrisy not allow this either No, I'm against terminating a life.But you’re for preventing a potential child life No, I'm pro-contraception.Yes your hypocrisy noted It is, read thisfe·tusˈfēdəs/Submitnounan unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular, an unborn human babyNonsense A fertilized egg and a cloned cell represent a potential, not an actual human being. It’s a worn cliché, but it bears repeating—an acorn isn’t an oak tree and the egg you had for breakfast isn’t a chicken  Tell that to Mississippi*I did say “ primitive “ Mississippi “ and it’s inhabitants are not exactly renowned for being “ intellectual powerhouses “ are they ?Are you a native ?I ask this because of your views also on Evolution , it is a typical knee jerk Bible Belt retort by American religious nuts to the Evolution is fact statement , this seems to drive a fair amount of mainly Americans insane while the rest of the world know it as fact