azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Romeo and Juliet - Marriage?
Side: No, marriage not only option

I think that there were many options other than marriage. For starters they had only known each other for one day before the wedding. They could have just dated. Dating isn't even a good word for it. To be dating you should know each other for at least more than a day. They obviously weren't allowed to be seen with each other so no matter what they were doing, it had to be secret. Hiding the fact that you're married is pretty hard to do. I understand that they were in love. "My only love, sprung from my only hate". This quote shows what Juliet thinks when she finds out that Romeo is a Montague. She still loves him and tries to make the best of it. The way that she made the best of it is what's wrong though. There were plenty of options other than marriage. If you ask me, she should have just dated Romeo secretly, or at least only having the Nurse and Friar Lawrence having knowledge about it. While marrying may have possibly brought the families together beforehand, it obviously failed miserably. In the end, love is what's killing these two, and my thoughts are that they should have just dated. They are rushing into marriage at a dangerously fast rate, and that is a mistake that the two of them really shouldn't fall into. In my opinion, marriage was not the only option.
Debate: Romeo and Juliet - Marriage?
Side: No, marriage not only option

I think that marriage was not the only option they had. This might not have been the best option but they could have run away together and eventually gotten married. They could have also talked to there parents and told them how much they cared for each other. "Content thee, gentle coz,...for a feast,"(Shakespeare 602). I chose this because it seems that Lord Capulet is ok with Romeo so maybe if they talked to their parents about the true love they had for each other they could have gotten them to understand and give them their blessing.
Debate: Romeo and Juliet - Marriage?
Side: No, marriage not only option

Marriage between Romeo and Juliet was not their only option. They could have just been friends and let the Paris thing not work. then maybe some how the families come together. then finally they can marry each other without their family problems." Thou shall continue for two-and-forty hours, and then awake from a pleasant sleep."(662 Shakespeare). this was something that is happening from heir marriage. Juliet has to fake die to be with Romeo.
Debate: Romeo and Juliet - Marriage?
Side: No, marriage not only option

Steven Staublein Marriage was indecisive decision made by Romeo and Juliet. Romeo and Juliet rushed too quickly into marriage even Friar didn't agree with them. "Wisely and slow. "They stumble that run fast" Friar said that on the bottle of page 617. That quote means that Friar even thinks that Romeo and Juliet are moving too quickly. Romeo and Juliet should have 'dated' before rushing into a marriage.
Debate: Romeo and Juliet - Marriage?
Side: No, marriage not only option

No, It was not the only option i think it all so part of the reason they died because romeo and Juliet didn't just stand up for their love instead it got two people dead and them as well . By the action of them we know they are not mature or even ready for marriage .
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I think that having a government is necessary because allows organization and control in our society. A government is needed to keep the people under control. We have laws to lay out what we can and can’t do. Without laws, we would have no limitations which could lead to an unorganized and chaotic lifestyle. Nowadays, not all people have the maturity to make smart decisions on their own without having limitations. I believe that our government is successful because we have laws to create boundaries, but we also have freedoms so that people don’t feel that they have no say in what is being decided. Another reason that government is important is that we need defense against outside forces. It is important that citizens feel safe and protected. Without a government, we would not be able to have a strong defense because the government produces goods and services, such as roads and national defense. I support having a government because it provides us with the control that we need.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your statement said in your argument. With out government there would be no public services. This would have the people fall ill and cause cities and towns to fall apart. There would also be no defense to protect the people. I 100% agree with you
Debate: Room 122
Side: No

With out government there would be no public services.Maddeningly, you provide not the slightest explanation for why you believe it to be the case that people are incapable of organising themselves without the oversight of government. I find your premise to be astonishing given that it is the organisation of people which led to the very government (and hence public services) you are defending!!! Your empty claim works just the same if we substitute the word "government" for "king", "queen" or "emperor". Without the emperor there would be no public services. How about that?
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with what you are saying entirely. An absolute lack of laws would cause some (not all) people in a society to act in violent ways if there are no organized police squads formed without government aid. In addition, you make a strong point that there would be a lack of a strong military in an anarchist society, leaving it open to invasions and takeovers by other states. Without taxes, the quality of public services would decrease as well. Finally, most people want to live, structured, orderly, safe lives, which a government can provide.
Debate: Room 122
Side: No

In addition, you make a strong point that there would be a lack of a strong military in an anarchist society, leaving it open to invasions and takeovers by other states.With respect, your appeal to paranoia is just so primitive and stupid. Firstly, a "strong military" makes you a direct threat to other states, leading them to build their own "strong military" until the eventual result is either an all-out war for dominance, the destruction of the species, or a Cold War standoff with millions of lives at risk.Secondly, and perhaps more pertinently, never in the recorded history of mankind (at least not to my meager knowledge) has any invader not had to deal with the military of the state he is invading. Hence, your premise that the military will keep you safe from invaders is about as false as they ever get. An invader would have to be seriously struggling in the aptitude department to presume the place he intends to invade will not be defended.The problem you Americans seem to have generally (and it is almost certainly because of pro-gun propaganda) is in distinguishing attack from defence. Armies are for attacking other armies, not for building defensive shields around you to protect you from harm. The average American's confusion between these two concepts is perhaps one of the most pernicious, if not outright puzzling, aspects of contemporary life.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your thoughts on government being necessary. We absolutely need our government to keep the peace among the people. It is very important to have boundaries which are made by the government. The government is needed to keep the peace of the people and the country as a whole. I completely agree with what youre saying about how we need government.
Debate: Room 122
Side: No

We absolutely need our government to keep the peace among the people.You have the highest incarceration rate in the entire world, idiot. Your government's idea of keeping the peace is putting everyone in jail.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your thoughts that government is necessary. I agree because your right that we need government to keep the peace among the people. It's important to have law to keep people safe and alive. The government is needed to protect people,save lives and keep people happy. I agree with you about how we need a government.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I would rather live under a government for a variety of reasons. First off, living without a government would cause disorganization throughout the whole country. People wouldn't know who to look up to. In addition to that, people wouldn't know who is looking out for us as citizens. With no government means no military, which essentially ends up being every man for himself. With a government, this would not be an issue, and there would be strength in organization and unity. In addition to not being organized, there also would be no higher organization over all citizens to help us when we need it. Veterans would get no help when they need rehabilitation and therapy. The secret service wouldn't be looking out for us overseas when we don't even know we need the help. With no government, so many things would be unleashed on us that we aren't even aware of. The government deals with the country's problems on a daily basis, and without it, they would fall upon citizens, and we wouldn't have a single clue what to do without a government.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I support this argument and everything it says for many reasons. People will be looking for someone to look up to and have someone to take care of everyone. Not everyone can provide for themselves and it is important to have a government to ensure that everyone feels taken care of and protected. There is no way that the citizens of the country would be able to handle all of the responsibilities that the government does. This is why the government is needed to handle things that are out of our knowledge. Everyone should feel protected with a strong military that can protect us.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

You make a great point here. We wouldn’t know what to do and nothing would make sense. It would all be absolute chaos. There would be no help or order to the country. Like you said it would be “every man for himself” and all order would be lost.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

While I, personally, think the government is doing a lot of harm at the current time, I think we need it. I mean... think about it; without a government we would have no way to be protected from other countries and from crime inside our country, we would have no way to trade with other countries, and in the end we would have no structure what so ever. So while we think we could do better on our own, we need it. It just needs some improvements.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

Why is the government harming us? they provide us services like infastructure, medical, utilities services, and many more services. Also, they keep peope in order by enforcing laws and having politicians running our nation. Then, our government invests our tax dolars into improving our servies listed above to give us a better life. Our government helps people follow laws and give freedoms to give people the best possible life. In conclusion i believe you're right about the government being necessary, but I believe they don't do harm to us.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your argument. I also think that we need a government to deal with foreign affairs. It would be too difficult for a governmentless state to respond to war fare. With a government, people stay safe.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I would rather live in a world that is being organized by a government. If we did not have a government too many things would be out of place. There would be no laws, which most people think sounds fun but in reality, if you have no laws then anyone can doing anything they want without having the least amount of punishment. To go along with having no laws, we also would have no justice system meaning that being innocent until proving guilty would probably go out the window. If we have no justice system then criminals could be able to walk the street, and people who have done nothing wrong could be falsely accused of something they didn't do. No government also meaning no local government which would mean no police force, or any departments that are at city hall, like sanitation, and public works which are in place to protect citizens of a town. If we had no government we would have no taxes which would mean that none of these departments would be funded anymore. this meaning that we would't have clean water, safe roads, trash trucks, or even 911. So if you had a fire or were in a car accident, then you wouldn't have the fire and rescue to safe you. If we had no government then we would be living in a considerably more dangerous world and we need the government to make sure that everything is running safely and smoothly.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your opinion on the criminal justice system. Though I didn't touch upon it much in my response, I think it's clever how you mentioned that innocent people could be targeted for no good reason. Not only would this bring more danger and unfairness to our society, but it would prevent good people from assisting in our evolution. This means that we may not be able to adapt to changing circumstances, which could make us prey of many things (not just humans). If this were to become reality, the human race may dissolve as a whole and possibly become extinct.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I believe that the presence of a government is absolutely necessary. It is a system that manages to maintain order and peace within our nation, and we would most likely dissolve into chaos without it. Without safety inspections, we would most likely have contaminated water as well as unlivable conditions in our homes. Without traffic laws, car crashes would be much more frequent, and poor care for roads could result in further automobile damage. While we wouldn't have to pay taxes, that would also mean that the government wouldn't be able to anyone else's needs, thus eliminating banks and organized cash flow. The absence of these systems could potentially result in a loss of currency, as well as the loss of jobs, which could lead to a nation-wide state of poverty. This would mean that police officers would eventually become extinct, leaving criminals to run free. With the addition of stealing and murdering, our community would quite possibly become a terrible wasteland. This chaos could most likely spread across the rest of the world, leading to complete disorder. However, a fair, peace-keeping force would provide assistance in this situation. With the assistance of our government, we can manage to maintain a safe, useful national system in which we can reside in ideal conditions.
Debate: Room 122
Side: No

It is a system that manages to maintain order and peace within our nationYou know that there was a civil war in America, right?
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your statement, the government is absolutely necessary so that we can maintain order and tranquility. The examples of chaos that would occur without a government can show government organization on an everyday basis. Without any of the laws in place, we would not be able to afford basic goods or depend on living in safety. I agree that the government causes tranquility because we are able to have an organization. We all have a routine that is working where we can depend on the safety and a successful cash flow. The government a lot of the citizen's problems every day, without it we would not be able to have the safety and organization we need.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

Our government is important for keeping our lives the way it is right now because without the government, our lives would be worse. For exampe, we would not have the necessary snaitary services we like and heavily rely on. Also, water, electricity, and other utilities arent gauranteed to be the way the are today and could become dangerous. The weather service and GPS arent going to work because both services are government services. There are no reguations and inspectors are here to make sure all our products are 100 percent safe. Without the government, we would not be able to have safe infastructure, especiallly roads. Since there wont be any laws without government, people can do anything they want and desire. Witout government, you wont be gauranteed certified medications and government which could mean that you can end up with bad dictors and medications. You wont be able to acsess emergency services because the services are ran by the government. No banks and financial aids are available since those were ran by by the government. In conclusion, the life of the average person would be worse without government.
Debate: Room 122
Side: No

without the government, our lives would be worse. For exampe, we would not have the necessary snaitary services we like and heavily rely on.I honestly have never heard anything so plainly ridiculous. Are you perhaps unaware that people build and maintain sanitary services? Not government. People.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

There are several reasons why a government is needed. First of all, without it, the nation would be in complete chaos. There would be no laws, no one to control the people, and anyone could just do whatever they want. This means murders would happen all the time, and no one would be safe. Without a government to protect them, the country could be invaded, or any type of crime could be committed. Also, there would be no maintenance, so everything would be in disrepair. Additionally, there would be no regulations, so anyone could be cheated, you couldn't trust your food or water, and there would be even more chaos. There would also be much more conflict because there would be no government to stop it and people would be fighting for power. The government actually does much more than most people realize, and without it, the world would be in shambles. In conclusion, the government is extremely necessary because it keeps nations from going into disrepair and chaos.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

Government is necessary. There are many reasons to support this. A government ensures that all people have their basic ends met. The government takes care of simple things like making sure the garbage is cleaned up and also having a pure supply of water. Without the government, many citizens would become very ill which leads to chaos because people have no way of taking care of themselves. Another reason is that without a government there would be no laws or any regulations. This causes extreme danger and chaos for everyone. Having laws keep us protected and held accountable for bad actions. Without the government, people would do anything they desired which causes terrible things to happen. The government provides justice. If someone does something illegal, the judicial branch will make sure the right person is being punished for the right crime. This is very important to keep people accountable. Government also provides the access of basic public education everyone deserves and should obtain. Everyone should have the chance to know how to read and write. Without a government, the countries citizens will become less and less educated. Another strong reason, is a defense or a military. The government provides a military to act as a defense for us and to keep us safe. The idea of having no government makes it very easy for other countries to take over and to be at war with us because we wouldn't have any control or a strong military to protect ourselves with. The governments police also protect us from internal threats like organized crime. Having no government would eventually lead to no people living within that country anymore. The government keeps us safe, healthy, and protected. These are all basic things that everyone wants to ensure are being taken care of. Without a government, everything would quickly break down leading to chaos and potentially death. Government keeps us all in check and taken care of to the best we can be.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I would rather live under a government then without one at all. One reason being that it provides us with laws. The laws that it provides us helps keep us safe and it gives society a structure that is needed. Government also provides us with order to help to maintain peace. For example it gives us police and firefighters etc- to help maintain peace and protection as well. Another reason why we should have a government is it because it provides children with basic need education. Another reason we need a government is it provides us with protection against security threats. Another reason why we need a government is it makes it so that no one person can have all the power it makes sure everyone is heard. Government also provides people with things. Things it provides us with are things like new roads, money need for schools etc-. Another reason we need a government is it just helps keep order in our country.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I agree with your statement, laws are important to keep peace in a country. Laws are also to prevent violence in dangerous cities or anywhere in the country. I also agree with you about having an education in a government to help educate young people. I agree with you when you talked about the "things" a government provides for the citizens. The government also gives the citizens rights. Overall, I agree with this statement.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I believe, that this world without a formal government would be torn into pieces. With no laws, and citizens being allowed to do whatever they want this world would be so chaotic nothing would able to get done. Who will have jobs, who will take control of currency, and who will even be able to live their lives without having to worry about their own needed safety. Without any government system, who would defend the citizens from other attacking countries. Also, who would interact with other countries to get the supplies we need to live. To add on, who will take care of our new found technology, after lots of hard work by other citizens all of that would go into complete waste. Also, who will develop and create new technology to better advance our society. Lastly, with no laws people of society can torture the life of humans and even animals. Along with that all of our supplies will be fought for between other humans causing a mass amount of deaths completely destroying society. To wrap it up, without any sort of government this world would be torn into pieces.
Debate: Room 122
Side: Yes

I highly support the idea of a government. The lack of a government would bring up such madness and chaos which people would not be able to bare. Any government is better than no government. The idea of living in unity in a state and having such a thing called the government is man's most genius creation. Government protects the people in its state, it controls things like medication and food so that they are trustworthy, and most importantly it organizes money from the people and establishes schools and roads. Without a government people are open to attack and the state is extremely vulnerable. No taxes means no army to protect the territory. We would not know if the food we eat, medication we take, and the water we drink are safe to take in without a government telling us that it is. These things we think are safe could poison us and kill us. No taxes also mean no school which would cause the upcoming generation to be uneducated. And even if there would be private schooling institutions it would be hard to get there because there would be no roads and there would also not be any public transportation. Also, without a government there would be no standardized punishment for crime. So everyone would be in danger at all times. Their property would also be worthless because it could be taken away at any time by anybody with a stronger power. To conclude, a state that lacks a government would not be a state at all. It would be a land ruled by fear and chaos.