Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"My sources show precisely how India was exploited by Great Britain, did you even bother to read them? You may ignore them all you like but as for myself and anyone else on this site, we know that India was exploited by your country. Your denial changes nothing."We founded India's infastructure we built its vast and powerful railway system,started many schools, bridges and roads. Sure we exploited them but I doubt that the U.S.A has never exploited a country."And your country is incapable of voicing it's own opinion?"We only cared about our empire at the time, I doubt you presidents pitch would have mention that the League would have failed drastically."So only rich people are important in your eyes?"Are you denying that the U.S doesn't have the same opinion?"You were not fighting "most of europe" you were fighting Nazi Germany,"which had Conquered France, Poland, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg and other countries meaning its territory covered most of Europe" and you had the help of the Russians, which easily outnumbered the Germans."Russia was invadedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II) ) "And if you recall, we did help you. Where this delusion that we "didn't help you" comes from, I cannot say, but you incessantly repeating it makes it no less false."No, you didn't help us, we stood on our own and you only joined after the Battle of Britain(1940)-U.S join war(1941)"You did not help us fight Japan. Which makes you a hypocrite."Liar, we helped you at:Indian ocean raidBattle of Badung StraitGuadalcanal campaignBattle of Admin Box-Battle we fought without your helpBattle of Imphal-Battle we fought without your helpBattle of Kohima-Battle we fought without your help"The might of a country does not come from the size of it's borders."The amount of land it has contributes to the amount of food it can generate and the amount of military it can recruit etc.The fact that many other people fighting your side of the debate calim that U.S.A must be superior due to its size supports my argument."No you didn't. I asked you what made you think that The Japanese were planning to surrender and your response was "what makes you think it's okay to bomb innocent people", which in no way answers my question."http://www.rense.com/general72/jee.htm"There was an attempted coup after Emperor accepted surrender, his decision was pretty unpopular even after TWO nuclear weapons leveled two Japanese cities."Now answer my question: what makes you think its ok to wipeout innocent people?"I appreciate the fact that you admit when you know you're wrong, but when exactly have I "Blankout all the evidence"?"For example earlier on I listed all the failures of your country which you just ignored, on the other side of the debate answered against a completely biased argument and you then highlighted 1 sentance which you disagreed with and claimed I was wrong, at least I can admit when my opponent is right."You must have strong resolution to have been wrong so many times in this debate and to continue on."It is a skill you have yet to learn"No, you will find that this was not your most recent military failure. You're forgetting the second and third Anglo-dutch wars"One of the few wars we actually lost" and of course the American Revolutionary war."Once of the few wars you actually won"Yes, but you did not mention how immoral it is to intentionally addict a populace of a foreign country to opium which you are importing into the country illegally. "You fail to admit that it is completly immoral to nuke a town of civilians becauseyou are at war with their leaders."I won't dispute that, but it doesn't change the fact that your nation has plenty of it's own failures to boast....as does nearly every nation on earth."But our failures are debatable about, yours are just fails."They wouldn't need to be liberated in the first place, if not for the oppression suffered under English rule."It was a time of empires, if they weren't part of ours they would have been claimed but the Dutch, French or Spanish.  "As to why I said "It had little to do with condoms". What does abortion have to do with condoms? "Why did you bring condoms into it? "If anything condoms reduce the cause of abortions, unwanted pregnancies."If anything condoms reduce the amount of risk taken by under-aged sex, implying that under-aged sex is ok."Okay, but it does no good to complain about what is an effect of the free market. Do you propose a solution?"Most of the media is mainly following that of the 1920's and when Media first started, if you know so much about your own countries history you will know how provocative and explicite it was at the time."Maybe you forgot who I am. It makes no difference whatsoever what "religious" traditions or morals say, when religion is the manifestation of man's irrationality. Religious tradition also taught man that the sun revolves around the earth and anybody who dared say otherwise was a heretic.likewise any moral tradition not based on fact and reason, is worthless.There are many men who have never felt, or never will feel a woman's touch, for them depictions of sex (on print or screen) is as close as they will ever get and this brings them solace. Who are you to deny them that?"Many men see sex and think "hmm, I want some of that" and go rape girls, is that what you want? and the problem of your country is that it has no traditional values, meaning no social barriers.