azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

I have offered an excellent analogy showing human nature is bad, and many logical, factual, and realistic supporting arguments. No, you haven't. You have offered your theological beliefs in the form of an analogy, and some claims that have been thoroughly rebuked.  You pretty much do nothing but insult me,I did not insult you until well after you took it upon yourself to tell me and others what our beliefs were. I have no tolerance of patience for people to behave as you do.and your personal preference of being rude over exercising your brain to discuss the debate like an adult should be more than enough for you to know your nature is bad the same as me who you are trying to prove is not as good as you.From the very beginning I have discussed the debate with you. Every debate I have come across I have started by debating with you, and in every instance you were thoroughly incapable of actually debating. Instead, you lied, told people what their opinions were, and repeated the same theological beliefs over and over.We are both not good, there is no good, no not one. There is no good or evil. Human nature is bad and God is merciful so He gives us time to breathe His air as a gift. You argue against Him because your nature is bad and He is good. You are getting what you deserve, refusing God's offer of pardon and forgiveness. I hope you change your mind about the value of your sin....and I don't have to name your sin specifically, you know what it is and you know God hates it because it's for nothing but your self-serving pleasure and ego and totally against God's right to rule over you which you can deny but you cannot deprive Him of. Your own death proves it and you deny it and what good are you?I just love how you use theology to enact your little power trips. It is entirely self serving, and if there is a god, I'm fairly sure they would see through it.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

i'm sorry, but nobody here is entitled to take on your identity complex or it's consequences
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

If you can't see that human nature is bad, I don't think you can see.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

"If you don't agree with me, then you are blind".Further demonstrating that you can not debate.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

If a person is bound and determined to prove that they have the right to exist outside of the fire of Hell, there is nothing to debate...just let them go try to prove it. Why waste time arguing with a fool?
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

This is why we are not born with a sexuality, thank you for finally agreeing with me by accident. :)
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

I would say good as everyone has good in mind but they sometimes they can choose whether they want to be good or bad.. but everyone has good at heart unless you are a terrorists..
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

You can choose to do good or bad because bad is in your blood, in your bones, in every fiber of your genes. You can choose to do good because there is still something in you that is like God because He created us in His image. It is His desire for us to be good that values us as worth being redeemed by Him....to show that He is good. We have gone bad and God will change us to be good forever in eternal life if we believe on Him as our Savior and receive Him by faith as He is, risen from the dead, Jesus Christ.Doing good does not make you good. You are gone bad no matter how much good you do. We all went bad and death is in us because of it. Only God is good. Your standard of being "good" is an attempt at self-justification trying to exempt or eventually excuse yourself from punishment.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

Humans are naturally social animals, and morality is built into us. This morality can be restricted to those whom we view as "human", and therefore groups we don't view as fully human can result in the brunt of it. Humans, at our core, are just animals, and work on many of the same principles of social primates. Do we question the morality of a band of maurauding chimps, or promiscuous bonobos? This is the "nature" aspect of the "nature vs. nurture" argument- it is in our instincts as a measure of evolutionary self-preservation.Some humans are psychopaths or sociopaths. Does their existence not prove the rule, by being an exception to it? These are people who have inherently bad natures, and they are perceived as being inhuman. The average person does not exhibit these tendencies.Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has a lot to say about the inherent good and evil of mankind. She seems to be pointing out that man is good, but society can produce great evil. That love breeds love, and rejection results in hatred and violence. Rejection can only hurt when there was love in the first place.Humans are inherently good, which can be corrupted by flaws, 'sin' and societal influence.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

That's exactly what I think, Humans are born good and as time passes they are corrupted by society. Outside influences, for instance, society and custom, are responsible for deviations from natural and healthy development in humans. In Yale University, students have tested babies' minds on whether they are good or bad. The results they have collected state that even the youngest of minds know what is right and wrong, and an instinct to prefer good over evil, since they are at their most innocent age, they have no evil intention so, our intuitive responses or first instincts tend to lead to cooperation rather than selfishness.On the other hand, People never hear about a person who kills just to kill. There is always a reason to do it... and yes, usually done when at the age of an adult because that is when humans are most corrupt and damaged with society.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

Human nature is neither good nor evil. Human nature is the amalgamation of our evolutionary instincts and survival tactics, which is morally neutral.Another question is how do you define "good" and "evil" in this context? The most obvious idea is that good= baking cookies for your neighbor and evil=stalking them. Intuitively, we know that one is right and one is wrong. But which of these two actions is the natural tendency?Evolutionarily, it would make sense that we would seek out our neighbor in a friendly and social manner, in order to widen our support network. It would also make sense for us to keep a close eye on them if we mistrust them or view them as a threat.Because perception is inherently subjective, human's natural inclination towards good or evil is also entirely subjective. I venture that we are asking the wrong question, and that good and evil varies by the individual.So what does "human nature" refer to?
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

this is a lot of self-contradictory nonsense.....sad that a seemingly intelligent person can be so insane.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

If you bothered to think it through, you'd realize it wasn't contradictory at all.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

I pretty much gave up on trying to think through pretty much anything you say because it's pretty much always self-contradictory like you.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

It really isn't. You don't pay any attention to what I say, so you declare it is self-contradictory (without ever explaining how) because you never have any legitimate response to it.You are pathetic.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

You are arguing that human nature is good while you are calling me pathetic and acting like a jerk? So where's the good in that, oh human? God made man good, perfect, and he went bad, fell from being good into being corrupt, gone bad. That's why you are acting like a jerk and you see me as pathetic. Bad.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

You are arguing that human nature is good while you are calling me pathetic and acting like a jerk?I've never claimed it was good, I was simply disputing you.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

If I tried to think through anything you say, it would make my head spin in confusion. You are a pathological liar, and to try to think your confusion through can lead only to a short circuit of the brain. I'll pass on trying to understand your methods. When you start being honest about how you got hurt and messed up mentally and emotionally, and start thinking maybe God really does love you and care enough to fix you...maybe I'll talk to you then.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

Days later you are still seriously spam insulting me?My god dude, let it go. I quoted you, people pointed it out, that's all there is to it.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

I don't know what you are talking about, but whatever it is I know you are lying because you have not stopped lying since the first time I saw you talking.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

"The debate is valid, I have offered validations of the fact that God loves you and I invite you to explain why you believe God does not love you. If this is too much of a challenge to be considered acceptable for this site, I would have to say it's a small-minded site, with all due respect."
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

It is human nature to fight to survive. It is human nature to try to save another human in danger. There are those whose human nature is twisted, but the vast majority are compassionate. Over centuries I believe the survivalists would win out over the "twisted ones". I also believe that injecting a "god entity" that simply MUST be followed associated with "rules" that are set up by the most passionate humans following that entity leads to an abundance of "twisted ones", as in the Crusades, and more recently, ISIS ... etc.! Left alone, I believe human nature and compassion would win over religious dogma, and IS, however slowly. It's just that someone keeps tossing the love of some "god" into the mix and screwing it up!
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

yeah, right. Your world ruler, the anti-Christ is coming to give you what you want if you are here long enough to see it. If you are not here long enough, you will get what you want forever being separated from God by your sin in the fire of Hell where all sin belongs, including yours....and you can blame only yourself though you will probably blame everybody but yourself most of the time forever in the fire....of course I am assuming here, based on the way you talk, you will defy God all the way through the finalization of your death. I hope I'm wrong about that. I really do feel sorry for my enemies....and you are indeed an enemy of God and me both.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

I think we are fundamentally self-interested. However, as a consequence of our natural equality, self-interest tends to makes us cooperate with one another and be "good."
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

The perceived concepts of good and bad can be somewhat complicated. If a man shoots his mother-in-law from a distance of 1000 yards he will be judged to be a good shot, but not necessarily a good person.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

There is no such thing as good or bad. He made a shot that connected. That is what it is. Man has no right to judge. He is nothing more than a person who made a shot that consequently resulted in his mother in laws death. Could have been gods will for all you know.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

enthalpy and the 2nd law of thermodynamics have the answer..the universe tends toward chaos..only thru WILL can order be created and maintained..humans are pushing a rock up hill all the time trying to do good in the world... while NATURE is working to destroy it, tear it down, disorganize it... constantly..so human "nature" is to do the work of the natural environment and help tear things apart..only the creative ppl want to bring order and beauty to the world... we are the "good" ones... but it is unnatural for us to do this..it requires a force of WILL.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

Sometimes you are not very far off in skyfish outerspacelandAdd to this that human nature needs a new anti-entropic will, a sinless nature ingrained in order to eliminate the chaos of entropic tendencies which lead to death and you are getting somewhere.Human nature is gone bad no matter how much beauty we desire or achieve...it's all tainted by the entropic effects of sin which destroys, it's all polluted like that proverbial glass full of pure and perfect water with a fatal dose of poison added to it. Man's will cannot remove that poison from his nature. Only God's will can restore beauty while removing entropy. God did not intend Creation to be victimized by entropy. He created all things perfect to be perfect forever. The disharmony of creatures who corrupted themselves to rebel brought entropy to Creation...in nature it is called entropy, in human nature it is called sin and it destroy, breaks everything down after God created it to as good.Creative people are no more good than any other people. Doing good things does not make you good. They are all polluted by the life-destroying entropic effects of sin. There is none good. Human nature is bad.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

So why did god create everything as it was, knowing what would happen before it did?
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

an "it" is a created thing. God is a person, He is the Creator. If you are going to do nothing but insult Him, I'm not going to talk to you. This will be the last time I will overlook your insults of the God I love who loved me when I was a hater like you.God created everything for Himself to enjoy. He knew what it was going to cost Him to make creatures like Himself with free will. He knew some of them would become proud and love the power He gave them and desire the admiration which only God deserves.He knew they would incur His wrath as they stood up against Him and for themselves, and He knew that to justify keeping them in creation as sinners He would have to pay for their sins Himself. You are created by God forever. God loves you and you exist forever. Will it be with God in heaven or without God in Hell? That's your only options if you believe it or not.If there is anything likable or admirable in you, it is only because God put it in you and God alone deserves the credit, the honor, and the glory for it. As a sinner, your tendency is to elevate yourself apart from God and you are an affront to Him. He loves you and does not want to give you want you deserve, which is Hell, so He gives you time. He paid for your sins with His own blood so you can be forgiven if you believe that He is risen from the dead and receive Him as your Savior. You can discuss this with God right now in prayer and He will hear you if you will agree with Him on these points.Again, if you will not refer to God as He is, God who is a person in masculine form, the Father of us all, I will not bother again trying to reason with you regarding His love for you.If I see you one more time refer to God as a god, or an it, or a he-she or anything other than who He is, God, I'm not going to respond to you again.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

Another little power trip, I see, trying to project yourself as being equal to or greater than God."Adhere to my beliefs or I will insult you" is all you have done here. Why should I be so bummed if you, someone who has admitted they are not going to debate and are here with the express intent of ignoring the purpose of this website, won't respond to me? Especially considering how you have said that before, and yet still find the need to lie about my beliefs and repeat the same shtick over and over?Come on now: You will respond again, and nobody will be surprised.Oh, by the way, by referring to your god as a person you have insulted him/it more than I ever have.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

God did not intend Creation to be victimized by entropy. .how do you know?.maybe she did and just wants to see who "wins" (this time)..its an illusion anyway.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

The myth of the motivated individual is a human fallacy and is not an appropriate analogy to understanding the world's order. It is rather "figurations", that is, networks of dependencies. i.e. the economy or the ecosystem
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

concepts of good and bad as we see them are entirely human inventions, so it would be quite absurd if the collective view of what we call bad happened to describe ourselves. however that is the case. children are not born with an inherent sense of right or wrong. infants have difficulty recognising between objects and people and treat them as a duality, furniture, to explore in a new world they have been brought into and do with as they see fit. it is only by recognising other personalities similar in some personal way to ourselves do we empathise with them and become considerate. to act as if all moving objects within certain criteria are people worthy of morality is what it means to be part of a society. however this only entails triggers for knowing when to act with moral judgement, the question of whether a distinct set of moral responses exit at birth or are naturally taught is something i can't answer, and have never heard to be previously discovered. however suggestive points would include infants choosing protagonists in a puppet show or children without sufficient tutelage of right and wrong occasionally acting wrongly.despite this indirect representation of human morality, it still carries weight, as the issue of not knowing the basic situations in which to act upon with moral consideration is, in my opinion, a large part of the moral code. otherwise, morality could be retracted at any time. (and is, for rocks, plants (and for some, many animals and humans (particularly those people with uncommon characteristics)))
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

Do you really apply yourself to make yourself believe this gibberish?
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

could you at least make the effort to attempt to read and point out what you disagree with? or do you just paste that statement whenever you see my name. you are one of many ambassadors for your opinion. if you don't represent it well you tarnish it and potentially ruin the progress of others working towards the same goal
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

Take a glass of pure water, put a fatal dose of powerful poison in the water......then drink it and see if it's good water.That's us. We are polluted. There is none good, no not one. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. We all have the poison of sin in us and it's killing our bodies and will destroy our souls in Hell if God does not remove it from us. In order to take away our sins, He took them on Himself and paid for them with His own blood as the Son of God. He paid in death for us so we don't have to pay in Hell. He rose from the dead bodily offering full pardon to all who believe on Him and call on God in His name to save them. He gives a new spirit, the Spirit of God, Jesus Christ Himself living in all who will receive Him as their Savior and have His promise of eternal life.Why people reject God's offer of eternal life through faith in His blood amazes me. No matter how plainly and simply it's said, they just can't (better, won't) see it. Men love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil. We are all gone bad and need to be born again as children of God to stop being children of Hell and the devil.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

It's not a question of good water it's a question of pure H2O or not; which is a mathematically findable percentage.There is no good and there is no bad. Infact, that was the original sin mentioned in the book of genesis. Only god knows what is good or what is bad. Man is not supposed to know what good and bad is. It's a concept that only we can create. Explained by the eating of the apple of the tree of knowledge of good and evil which merited adam and eve's eviction from the garden of Eden. Since you're bringing the bible into question in support of the wrong side. We have no right to judge because there is no good and evil. the symbolism of the tree is knowledge and thought which cursed us to death to begin with . apparently only god knows that or he wouldn't have created the devil... the advisory of man. Thought.The rest of your comment is nothing but unrelated religious banter and ranting that holds no merit.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

HHHAHAHHAHAHThis guy, or girl, or whatever it or they are, does not know the difference between good and bad and yet they expect you to believe they are intelligent people rather than talking monkeys.HAHAHAHAHHAHA
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

God is disappointed at how thoroughly you are failing his task for you.He told me.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

It's not a question of good water it's a question of pure H2O or not; which is a mathematically findable percentage.i thought that analogy would make me go insane, but you fixed it doc
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

you and your stupid math. 1 1/000000000000 th of one percent impurity makes the whole glass of water impure. You are impure because your soul is polluted by sin and you are stinking corrupt and have one foot in the grave and the other on thin ice which is being melted by the fire of Hell. You need to get saved while you can....if you can. Maybe God has given you over to a reprobate mind and you won't be saved, maybe you will always be against Him and against yourself.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

i don't suppose if i tell you you're right, you'll leave me alone will you?
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

You don't have to read my comments. You don't want to hear the truth. Why don't you just stop reading me? Leave you alone???....I've pretty much stopped reading your stuff anyways. If you feel like I'm bothering you, it's not me bothering you, it's God bothering you because you are fighting against Him and you are wrong for being that way.
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: bad

you are 99.999999999999% correct
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

you don't know what good or bad is and you are trying to present yourself as being intelligent?
Debate: Is human nature naturally good or bad
Side: good

You hold no merit because you hate God......which proves human nature is bad.