azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

i compleatly agrea with you. schools should be focused on teaching kids how to eat better instead of thinking how they can FORCE kids to eat better.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

I'm not sure how this site works, but yeah: I don't think there's such a thing as 'junk food' beyond things like 'Vanillin, Nutmeg and artificial trans-fats.' -- Those were my enemies. Still are some couple decades later.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Junk foods are not bad for itself. If you control yourself to only eat portion, I think it'll be okay to sell at school.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

i dnt think there is any need to bann it....it is all fine if students get some new taste .......why it shud be banned???student only spend few hours in school and if they have it then there is no big deal........
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

could you stop copying and pasting the same thing?.... it kinda gets a bit annoying ive seen this article three times already. Everytime on different times
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

i don't think there is any need to ban it....it is all fine if students get some new taste .......why it should be banned???student only spend few hours in school and if they have it then there is no big deal........
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

No, junk food should NOT be banned in school cafeterias. Firstly, banning junk food can result in binging later on. Every human nature wants more, when things are taken away from them. Taking away junk food from children will be ENCOURAGING them to want more junk food than they would have desired before. Then, without noticing, school WILL be encouraging the children to want more. People say that junk food is the leading cause of childhood’s obesity. However, wouldn’t banning junk food become the new leading cause because the children will desire it more? It’s like cigarettes. Just because some places are banned for smoking, do you think that they WILL NOT smoke out of that area? It stops nothing. In fact, it encourages more of it. Secondly, schools should educate children about healthy choice and encourage them to participate to physical activities. Banning junk food does NOT teach children HOW to make good and healthy choices. Just simply taking junk food away does not teach the children anything. It just simply takes away the CHOICE of having junk food. Are schools not meant to teach the children HOW to make the right choices, not FORCE them not to have any junk food? Instead of forcing the children, would it not be a smarter idea to educate and inform them about junk food and encourage them to do more sports?  Junk food should not be banned, because if they are banned, it will encourage the children to desire more of it, and will not teach the children anything. I hope I have convinced everyone and once again, junk food should not be banned in school cafeterias.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Your tongue has a limited variety of taste receptors because sugar, salt, and fat were the flavors most important for human survival over the last few million years of evolution. Your tongue craves sweetness because it signals ripe fruit. You yearn for salt because it’s an essential compound for basic body function. You long for fat because it’s an extremely dense source of dietary energy. On the other side of things, sourness can alert you to spoiled food, and bitterness can warn you about poisonous substances. So there for the human craves this so called "junk" food
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

No, those junk food companies give much needed money to schools.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Don't Bite the hand that feeds you!! Right------------------------Corporations donate millions of dollars to public schools. [1]One of the more popular methods for raising money is for a school or school district to sign an exclusive beverage contract with Coca-Cola or Pepsi in return for a share in the profits. The practice tripled across the nation from 1997 to 1999 and now includes 150 districts in 29 states, including many in Michigan, according to The Detroit New
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

I think they should just exercise their body until they can't feel their numb body. LOL. No I mean it. At least students are working their asses until there dead, literally.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

You know what, why don't you get your fat booty out and start exercising!>:D I saw all those twinkys in your purse.Lol. Also your mom as thunder thighs. Every time she walks an eathquake happens!:O And I live in China!:|
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

That is gonna be stupid because.. If they don't get it there. They will forced to get it somewhere else. And that wont lead to a nice end. Instead they should be counselled and a diet must be produced that they feel is working for them.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

FibreThere is absolutely no doubt that fruits and vegetables are rich in vitamins, minerals and all things good, and that they also contain fibre, which prevents constipation and other gastric problems. But too much fibre (for instance, when you eat platefuls of raw green leafy vegetables or salads like radishes day in and out) can mess things up – big time. Excess fibre often causes bloating, abdominal cramps and gas right away. In the long term, it can interfere with the absorption of minerals like iron, zinc, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus, causing some serious deficiencies. “Plus, each individual food you overdose on has its own set of problems,” says Dr Manjinder Sandhu, head of cardiology at Artemis Health Institute, Gurgaon. “For example, eating large amounts of carrots or papaya will not necessarily result in greater benefits for you. Though the body converts the beta-carotene into vitamin A, it absorbs only the amount it needs, leaving the rest to stay in the system. Over time, this turns the palms of your hands and soles of your feet a yellow or yellowish-orange, a condition called carotenemia.”Carotenemia can also occur when you drink too much carrot juice or over-eat other foods high in beta-carotene, such as sweet potatoes, squash, spinach and broccoli. The condition, fortunately, is harmless and can be sorted out simply by staying away from vitamin A-rich foods for a while. “Papaya also has a digestive enzyme called papain which has beneficial effects in moderation, but over-consumption can cause stomach discomfort, coughs, colds and wheezing,” says Dr Arpit Jain, senior consultant, department of internal medicine, Artemis Health Institute. “Papaya, orange and kiwi are rich sources of vitamin C, very high consumption of which can cause headaches, vomiting, bladder irritation and occasionally, kidney stones too.” Finally, too many apples may cause gas, bloating and diarrhoea because of high fibre and sorbitol, and oranges and tomatoes can cause stomach irritation due to their high acidic content, Dr Jain adds.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

NO.It has also been proven that no one can force you to eat the junk food. True, some people do eat it as comfort food, but that's their choice you see. Child obesity may be higher than before, but its not all because of junk food. Children have lost the will to excersize. Wheres the fun? All you do is get hot, sweaty and tired. I'm sure some kids still enjoy excersize but those kids are few. Most kids would rather sit at home and play games where they shoot zombie people or run around collecting coins. Some kids eat to much junk food but, its our body! We don't tell you you can't smoke! We say you should not, but should not and YOU CAN'T are two totally different things. Gym periods, they may be short but from my experience, most schools give a rigorous workout in gym. Any kid who doesn't do well on school work or testing is because they don't understand the material or they just don't care. Junk food is bad for you in large quantities, but in the small amounts most people eat it in, it is not harmful. This is TheBono123 and I approve this message.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Resolved. why banned junk food. 240 kids died from starving. 240(drag it)x2 Just think of it. If eaing junk food while playing games , you will be smarter at that game and just one second. They will gain expirience without even knowing it. its also healthy for the mine. its like taking candy from a baby , but in a good way. A honeybun will satisfy your sweet tooth. You choose.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

!I strongly believe that school should not ban junk . what they should do is get the teachers to teach their students to teach them how they can limit the amount of junk food they can eat or how much junk food is in the junk food. Also if kids want to be obese its their choice, i mean come on you can tell when you start to get a little over weight !! And just because you ban them at school it doesnt mean that they will stop the student , there it many stores out there that will have junk food and the parent may or may no but it for them. Depending of course on what kind of parent they are ! most parents dont think junk food is healthy bit it really is ! A little junk food every once in a while wont do any one no harm .
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

i believe that junk food should be allowed in schools. i mean think about the schools main corses like the pizza they serve it is extremly greacy. not to mention the nachos that chease is not real chease it is all processed, and my school ocationaly serves EXTRA greacy waffles and/or pankakes. if they wan't to help kids make better choices they should find healthier substitutes for theoes foods
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

schools should focus on their students education more than how they can make them eat better. just because they see a few kids out of the thousands of kids that can be in the school does not mean that they need a menu change. it should be up to the parents what their kids eat not the school districts.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

from my point of view the government is just trying to take more control of this nation students have the right to eat what they please so the gov. should butt out of this. let the parents decide what is best for THEIR kids not the government.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

parents should teach their kids that it is OK to eat junk food in moderation and have at least an hour of exercise daily. junk food can part of a healthy diet
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

erw35rvgfteddacqefw2xsdwsawzrfajhghjghsggdgdfgfvahdfhysadtfdgfdx gzfrds s fafsfasytfdufsydutsyudatdysuafdyaf asjgHGSXfaatf ASFYFAtyfastyfdsaytdfstyfdft ijnfdjkshgjdshgshghhjghdfbgf n m c bfgrtgtge hi
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

spammer.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

we can eat whatever we feel like and they aint gonna stop us wether they like it or not
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

hi hi hi ni hi ih mxcbixbhuvzdhhji shhjbvhjhxijhfu h ∫vhjicxbvhjubdfsijbvijcinsdfjkrhn bich
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

BENS AMG BMW NBCVJBSVHJDSBFVHSBFHUBSHBDHUBSHAMG AMG AMG AMG BEN BENS BENSW BEN ANG
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Junk-food shouldn't be banned in school canteens. I know, that kids can get fat and obese/overweight, but it is their choice to eat fattish foods if they want to.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

good job I believe you have mastered the word spam.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

i don't like how school administrators are making such a big deal about the way students eat instead of doing their job and focusing on how to better our education
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

The people who are in the no side, junk food can make you gain weight and u can die earlier in ur life. Just saying.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Junk food should not be prohibited ,because in this modern world eat junk food.if we ban it we lot of workers will lose their daily income.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Lot of children also like junk food very well they won't eat normal food. If we ban junk food children will start to fight. After this the government should teach how to and what to eat
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Junk food makes kids happy and I don't want to see their happiness taken away from them.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

i found out prison food is better for you why did america get this far now they want to get rid of junk food well look how much is in school food
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

they should not ban junk food from public schools because people probably don't want to eat veggies all the time.That's my reason
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

fuck you stupid motherfuckers , don't you see that junk food is part of our childhood , had you never eaten junk food before ? fuck you
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

No because without junk food we would hardly have food that we like...
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Freedom for choice will be lost!!!.Most globalized countries' economy will be down.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

if schools want to make sure that students are eating right then just stop whith the extrreamly greacy crap like the pizza i had for lunch today was EXTREAMLY greacy and i don't need the greace they need to find a better way to prepare our lunches.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

After i did some reaserch i found out that prizon food is healthier that the food that they serve at schools. i don't like knowing that a guy who is in prizon for murder is given food that is better than the food that is given to someone who has done nothing wrong and is working hard in school so they can be sucessful. that is just plain wrong.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Yes, yes, yes.... but with machines and not people for the time being.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

machines are not capable of doing everything a person can. For example, Some missions have the chance of losing connection to a ground base which can control machines, if a human operator is needed for a machine's operation then the whole mission is at risk. Having a human up there improves the chance that something won't go wrong on critical missions. yes, trips should be cost effective and that means that some trips at least, should be manned. we owe much to space exploration, and it still has much to give. It should indeed be invested in.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

We can send many, many unmanned missions for the same price as one manned mission... until we are able to send humans great distances quickly and bring them back quickly I'd rather spend our limited resources on sending as many unmanned missions out to explore all the moons, asteroids etc as possible.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: No

There are other more important missions then random spatial space exploration. By the way most spatial space exploration is by necessity and efficiency going to be done with unmanned ships, at least for a long while. The world benefits more from exploring how things behave in space.http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/16jan_sts107/
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: No

How is this adding to the argument? Please elaborate on your beliefs.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: No

What would be the point of exploring moons, asteroids, and other celestial objects? It wouldn't teach us anything about our planet. Scientists are desperate to find life out in space to prove their origin theories. That's what they are wasting our money on. We have telescopes in space and on the ground. We have wasted enough time and money.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

What would be the point of exploring moons, asteroids, and other celestial objects?To gain knowledge of the formation of said moons, asteroids and celestial objects.It wouldn't teach us anything about our planet.Is our planet not a celestial object now?Scientists are desperate to find life out in space to prove their origin theories. That's what they are wasting our money on.So you're content to twiddle your thumbs on Earth in ignorance of our vast universe. Typical of superstition, to never aspire towards knowledge. That's why the rise of Christianity saw a millennium of stagnation known as the middle ages, and the Islamic middle east regressed for centuries when its religion took over.We have telescopes in space and on the ground. We have wasted enough time and money.Which are still limited, and which do not give us the security of another planet should an asteroid hit us.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: No

To gain knowledge of the formation of said moons, asteroids and celestial objects.This doesn't answer the relevance to us. Is our planet not a celestial object now?It is unique and special. No other planet is as complex. Typical of superstition, to never aspire towards knowledge.You mean aspire to more absurd assumptions? That's why the rise of Christianity saw a millennium of stagnation known as the middle ages, and the Islamic middle east regressed for centuries when its religion took over.The Ptolemaic model was created during the rise of Islam. Which are still limited, and which do not give us the security of another planet should an asteroid hit us.So what kind of device to suggest?
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

This doesn't answer the relevance to us. It is relevant to us because we are the ones seeking that knowledge.It is unique and special. No other planet is as complex. Prove it.You mean aspire to more absurd assumptions? I said it before, I'll say it again:Typical of superstition, to never aspire towards knowledge.The Ptolemaic model was created during the rise of Islam. Wrong. He was alive centuries before Islam.So what kind of device to suggest?I already made that suggestion: visit other planets, move society outward.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: No

It is relevant to us because we are the ones seeking that knowledge.Assumptions don't equal knowledge. Prove it.Like I said you have to show me a planet that is as equally complex is ours. If not then you just assume and have no real stance. I said it before, I'll say it again:Typical of superstition, to never aspire towards knowledge.What I said before, assumptions don't translate to knowledge. Wrong. He was alive centuries before Islam.His theory and model were used all the way until Copernicus, this includes the rise of these religions. I already made that suggestion: visit other planets, move society outwardGo from habitable to inhabitable? Or do you have a magic machine that will convert an entire planet to be livable. If you do then you are far too deep into your own crazy ideals.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Assumptions don't equal knowledge. Your statement doesn't follow what I said, and it is demonstrably untrue anyway since everything we reason with is based on assumptions, including math.Like I said you have to show me a planet that is as equally complex is ours. If not then you just assume and have no real stance. I don't have to. I can use our knowledge about planetary formation, and life formation to predict that planets with life must exist elsewhere in the universe. This is, in fact, the established position in science. If you wish to dispute it, substantiate your claim by demonstrating how Earth is unique in the universe.What I said before, assumptions don't translate to knowledge. Assumptions are the bedrock of reason.His theory and model were used all the way until Copernicus, this includes the rise of these religions. Which wasn't your original claim. It also isn't on the topic.Go from habitable to inhabitable? Or do you have a magic machine that will convert an entire planet to be livable. If you do then you are far too deep into your own crazy ideals.It isn't magic, just a combination of engineering and environmental sciences. You create atmospheres on the planets you wish to inhabit.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Yes, yes definitely so everybody will stop with the terrorist and war drama send everybody to a different place lol
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Absolutely. Maybe we'd find a new energy source, or new cultures.. Even though we'd probably just try to enslave them.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Space exploration has the potential of discovering the yet undiscovered facts about space. It has a great potential of resolving mysteries that surround the outer space. It may bring about a dramatic change to our lives.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Through the exploration of space, we may find new minerals, new precious materials. We may end up finding new human-like species in the outer space. We may find new living beings that are better developed and better evolved than we are. Exploring space may lead us to the discovery of an all-new world. An unexpected progress and advancement that the living beings in space might have made, may take us by surprise.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

Earth isn't going to be around forever. If mankind wants to survive we will eventually have to move somewhere else. First we colonize the moon, then Mars, and work our way out of our solar system. When the technology will catch up, I can't say.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: yes

YES!! Oh how cool would it be to be able to go into space yourself? If you can imagine, what percentage of humans will ever have the chance of going into space? (Our generation). I've been to a space camp before (yes I know, how nerdy of me) in grade 6 and we were able to experience walking on the moon (with the aid of a large contraption thing, but it was still neat) and being in zero gravity (again with a large contraption, but it was weighted on the other side of a large climbing wall so you felt literally like you weighed zero pounds. It was neat!)Space exploration is the next big thing that we might as well do? Why stay cooped up on Earth for the rest of eternity? Why not try to do a little exploration around the town if I may call it that.
Debate: Should mankind invest in the exploration of space?
Side: No

Why stay cooped up on Earth for the rest of eternity?Because our planet is the only inhabitable one. There is no where else that could support life. No life has been found anywhere else. People continue to debate life on Mars, but to date life in any form has not been found. Get used to this planet it's the only one we got.