azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I tried to re-phrase my previous point every time you repeated yourself and you still failed to grasp it.You are wrong. It doesn't matter how many times you rephrase a wrong statement.You looked it up? Do you have a link for that?Sure. See below. Search for Ali and all you will find is that the guy who came after Muhammad was named Ali.Who caught me in the example provided?Other 1 caught you by saying "Wait, what?"How can I be caught if I didn't even attempt to trick anyone in the example provided?You did, by using the word hertz instead of hurts.You aren't making any sense.You lack the capacity to understand.In the context provided, target means who the joke is making fun of.You did not actually provide enough context. But, it was making fun of the idea that you can only compare the prophet Muhammad to Jesus because they are religious figures. Who thinks that? The createdebate community.While audience means which people the joke is intended to impress.Makes sense.I can imagine your next word twisting, now!You can't even imagine someone talking about a boxer.The Joke was intended to impress.Which joke are you talking about?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

I have rephrased because I thought you had the sense to know if I rephrased it, my statement wasn't wrong.Why do I have to search for Ali?I have been on many debate sites in the past and have all too much tried to cite sources to make posters understand, but it never gets anywhere. Why should I ever bother? There is a point where one has to stop trying to prove a point to someone who is incapable of receiving that point. I.e. you.It was me who had invented the character in that script I had made for you, so how are you supposed to know that he was implying he had caught someone because he had said "what?".And I don't believe he had said "wait, what?", he had simply said, "wait, what?"I was the one who had written that post with that script in it, so who do you think you are to tell me that the response of comparing hertz to hurts was meant as a trick?You didn't write it, so don't pretend to know what I was trying to say by that script."You did not actually provide enough context. But, it was making fun of the idea that you can only compare the prophet Muhammad to Jesus because they are religious figures. Who thinks that? The createdebate community."Did the createdebate community actually suggest that you can only compare Mohammed to Muhammed? Where did it ever say that? Most of the site knew they were referring to the prophet and not the boxer, only you didn't know.How can you make fun of something if it isn't even the case?See where I am going with this?I didn't say, "The Joke was intended to Impress", that is you making up a new quote, as well.I had said, "In the context provided, target means who the joke is making fun of".You provided a false joke, and in the context of that false joke, then I told you what the term "target" meant.Yet again, you should do the math, I shouldn't be doing your thinking for you, should I?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I have rephrased because I thought you had the sense to know if I rephrased it, my statement wasn't wrong.You are wrong. No amount of rephrasing will fix that.Why do I have to search for Ali?Man, everything has to be spelled out for you. You want to know how I know that no one called the prophet Muhammad Muhammad Ali. In order to do that you would have to search for the name Ali in the link I gave you.I have been on many debate sites in the past and have all too much tried to cite sources to make posters understand, but it never gets anywhere.When you give them the source do they act as retarded as you?Why should I ever bother?I don't give a fuck if you post a source. I posted mine. You weren't going to be able to find a source to support you any way.There is a point where one has to stop trying to prove a point to someone who is incapable of receiving that point. I.e. you.Yeah, but I am the one who needs to stop trying to prove my point because you are clearly incapable of receiving the point.It was me who had invented the character in that script I had made for you, so how are you supposed to know that he was implying he had caught someone because he had said "what?".So, your characters are just incredibly stupid and don't understand what is going on around them. You are going to need smarter characters in order to make a point.And I don't believe he had said "wait, what?", he had simply said, "wait, what?"Is there really a difference? I don't have time to go back to your incredibly stupid example to find the correct wording.You didn't write it, so don't pretend to know what I was trying to say by that script.You are too dumb to even know what you were trying to write. Are you claiming that I am wrong and the person in your example wasn't tricked and thought the use of hertz instead of hurts was funny?Did the createdebate community actually suggest that you can only compare Mohammed to Muhammed?You are too dumb for words. You can't be this dumb in real life, right? Look at what you quoted. I did not say comparing Mohammad to Muhammad. This is one of those cases where it is clear that you aren't listening.How can you make fun of something if it isn't even the case?This doesn't actually make sense. I can't play the pronoun game with you since your mind is all over the place.See where I am going with this?The question everyone else is asking.You provided a false jokeNo, you did. then I told you what the term "target" meant.And, I gave you the target. What's the problem?Yet again, you should do the math, I shouldn't be doing your thinking for you, should I?When are you going to start doing the thinking for yourself? Actually, you should stop thinking. Stop thinking that you are the only one who has something to say here. Stop thinking that you are the only one who is trying to get the other to understand something. Stop thinking that you have all the answers.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

I'm getting quite sick of you.I have tried BREAKING everything up for you and you just tossed it all over the place.A joke has to have some basis of truth in it, but has to have an element that isn't, i.e. imagination.The thing is, when he said that some people think Mohammed is referring to the boxer and not the prophet, that was too truth to actually be ironic. Since there were actually people who thought Mohammed was the boxer, that "joke" of yours was to ironic and actually to really be considered funny.A joke is funny once you subconsciously know that what you are hearing isn't quite true, but if what the person is joking about actually happens to be true, it isn't funny anymore.For example, making a joke like, "be careful with peeling that layer back, I'm sure it might flick right in your face and I might have to call an ambulance instead of your sports car lender" and the accident actually happened, it wouldn't be funny, because it actually happened to pass and ended up being quite grim.See what I mean?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I'm getting quite sick of you.I tend to make people sick when they don't listen to me.I have tried BREAKING everything up for you and you just tossed it all over the place.And, I have easily explained how everything you said was wrong.A joke has to have some basis of truth in it, but has to have an element that isn't, i.e. imagination.So, we are in agreement that what AveSatanas said was a joke?The thing is, when he said that some people think Mohammed is referring to the boxer and not the prophet, that was too truth to actually be ironic.No it didn't. Since there were actually people who thought Mohammed was the boxerThere wasn't anybody who thought Mohammad was the boxer. No one on here thought Mohammad was the boxer. The lone idiot here thought Muhammad Ali was the prophet.A joke is funny once you subconsciously know that what you are hearing isn't quite trueI understand that you didn't get the joke and that's why you don't think it is funny.but if what the person is joking about actually happens to be true, it isn't funny anymore.It doesn't have to be funny to be a joke. Plus, are you admitting that Muhammad Ali could beat up Jesus in the ring?For example, making a joke like, "be careful with peeling that layer back, I'm sure it might flick right in your face and I might have to call an ambulance instead of your sports car lender" and the accident actually happened, it wouldn't be funny, because it actually happened to pass and ended up being quite grim.Would that make the original statement not a joke?See what I mean?I understand what you are saying, but what you are saying deviates from your initial argument. You are saying that AveSatanas joke is not funny. That's fine. But, you have to stop claiming it isn't a joke.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

A joke has to have imagination and be funny in some sort of way, to at least somebody.That "joke" had no imagination, no context, nor was funny.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

A joke has to make fun of somebody or something.A joke has a theme, a joke has to be about something, in the same way that a book or a movie has to have a characters or objects within the scenes. You can't make a joke without it having anything in it.Let me make my point clear, for you, bucko.I have an example of a joke here."What do you call a """Was that joke funny? No, because it had no subject. Once you fill in the blank the joke starts to become funny, possibly. But if since there is nothing in the blank, the joke isn't funny.A joke is an idea that sounds amusing, saying you can only compare something to this or that without any amusing connotation to it is stupid. How is that funny?Of course you have to make fun of something for a joke to work, idiot.And I see you have a problem with the term "trucked up spoon", does it make you feel queasy?Bucko, it's just a phrase.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

A joke has to make fun of somebody or something.A joke has a theme, a joke has to be about something, in the same way that a book or a movie has to have a characters or objects within the scenes. You can't make a joke without it having anything in it.You have no sense of humor, and you have no idea what is a joke.Let me make my point clear, for you, bucko.I have an example of a joke here."What do you call a """Was that joke funny? No, because it had no subject.Without a subject it not only wasn't funny, it wasn't a joke. It was the start of a question.Once you fill in the blank the joke starts to become funny, possibly. But if since there is nothing in the blank, the joke isn't funny.Right, but even if the blank is filled in that doesn't mean it is funny. Just because you don't find it funny doesn't mean it wasn't a joke.A joke is an idea that sounds amusing, saying you can only compare something to this or that without any amusing connotation to it is stupid. How is that funny?You stupid fucking idiot. You are making the argument that we can only compare the prophet Mohammad to Jesus because they are similar and there can't be anything amusing to it. Now you are saying that it is stupid to think you can't find something amusing.Of course you have to make fun of something for a joke to work, idiot.I have a different view of making fun of things. What does the following joke make fun of? "What time is it when an elephant sits on your fence? Time to get a new fence."And I see you have a problem with the term "trucked up spoon", does it make you feel queasy?You are the dumbest fucking person on the face of the Earth, aren't you? I already told you that your stupid fucking phrase doesn't mean anything to me. Of course it doesn't make me queasy dumb fuck.Bucko, it's just a phrase.What does the phrase mean, stupid fucko?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Of course, without a subject, your idea of what was a joke was not only not funny, it was also not a joke.So therefore we should henceforth put the word "joke" in brackets to emphasize that what you think was a "joke" was not even a "joke".Your "joke" had no real subject, so therefore it wasn't a "joke".Claiming that the createdebate audience only thought you could compare Mohammed to Jesus when the createdebate site never said any such thing is like saying "The blue bear made me laugh" out of the blue, without any context. What blue bear made me laugh?In the joke you had made, you were making fun of the blue bear.You trucked up spoon, boasts
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

*elephant/fence, not blue bear.I said blue bear because my laptop is clogged up with fuel again after I had cleaned my laptop, yet again.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

So therefore we should henceforth put the word "joke" in brackets to emphasize that what you think was a "joke" was not even a "joke".You fucking retard. It is what you thought was a joke. Not me. You have no idea what a joke is.Your "joke" had no real subject, so therefore it wasn't a "joke".I didn't make a joke you dumb shit.Claiming that the createdebate audience only thought you could compare Mohammed to Jesus when the createdebate site never said any such thingYou fucking said that you stupid fucking piece of shit. You complained multiple times that we shouldn't be talking about the boxer. You are dumber than a box of rocks.In the joke you had made, you were making fun of the blue bear.How is it making fun of the elephant?You trucked up spoon, boastsYou are actually dumb enough that you are starting to hurt my head. Like dealing with the dumbest possible thing that could be said and then hear even stupider kind of pain. Your stupidity has no bounds. It's amazing.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Looks like you are becoming very pedantic.I never said it was actually a joke, I said it was theoretically a joke, according to YOU.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I never said it was actually a joke, I said it was theoretically a joke, according to YOU.Well, I proved that you don't know anything about what I consider a joke. So, it is really what you consider a joke.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

You still have no evidence.A joke has to have imagination.A joke has to be funny to at least somebody.A joke has to have real context about something stated to actually exist, except is twisted round.You can't twist round something that doesn't exist in any shape or form.For example you can't make a joke about a "blue garden fence looking so blue that you thought it was about to throw up over the flowers in the flowerbed", if no flowerbed actually existed. It would be totally random.There may have been imagination in that example, but it wouldn't even have been a sentence."Some people think Muhammed refers to the boxer and not the prophet".Some people think Muhammed refers to WHICH boxer? What boxer?It isn't even a sentence unless a boxer is actually called into question.If something is called into question, it means it has to be something that was previously stated. No boxer was previously stated to exist ACCORDING TO YOU.If anything, the poster may have originally meant that the author had misspelled Muhammed and that he meant the prophet, but the forum idiots somehow thought that he had meant the boxer and were unable to tell that the name was misspelled.Try to figure things out for yourself.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

You still have no evidence.False.A joke has to have imagination.AveSatanas imagined Muhammad Ali boxing Jesus. So check.A joke has to be funny to at least somebody.AveSatanas thought the joke was funny. So check.A joke has to have real context about something stated to actually exist, except is twisted round.AveSatanas twisted around the idea of comparing Jesus to the prophet Muhammad to comparing him to the boxer Muhammad Ali. So check.So, we are in agreement that what AveSatanas said was a joke."Some people think Muhammed refers to the boxer and not the prophet".WHAT? You pulled the wrong sentence. What ghostheadx said was not a joke. Why are you analyzing what ghostheadx said? We already know that wasn't a joke.Some people think Muhammed refers to WHICH boxer? What boxer?There is only one boxer named Muhammad that was famous, and since ghostheadx was referring to what AveSatanas said, we know the full name from AveSatanas' post: Muhammad Ali. He is the boxer we are talking about.It isn't even a sentence unless a boxer is actually called into question.AveSatanas called into question using the boxer Muhammad Ali.If something is called into question, it means it has to be something that was previously stated. No boxer was previously stated to exist ACCORDING TO YOU.You are out of your mind. I have told you over and over and over again that Muhammad Ali was mentioned in the very first post that you responded to. The very first post that you responded to was talking about the boxer Muhammad Ali and not the prophet Muhammad. So, NOT ACCORDING TO ME.If anything, the poster may have originally meant that the author had misspelled Muhammed and that he meant the prophetNo. No one misspelled Muhammad, the original guy added Ali. Adding Ali changed who we were talking about. but the forum idiotsYou are the only forum idiot.somehow thought that he had meant the boxer and were unable to tell that the name was misspelled.You need to stop playing the pronoun game. I don't know who you mean by "he" in this context. The guy who created the debate (Sherlock17) was talking about the prophet Muhammad. AveSatanas knew that Sherlock17 was talking about the prophet Muhammad. AveSatanas decided to make a joke anyway and changed the conversation to the boxer Muhammad Ali.Try to figure things out for yourself.You really have no idea how dumb you sound when you say things and you are corrected over and over and you think the person who is correcting you and putting you on the right track needs to figure something out.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Cartman, I didn't realise you were talking about what AveSatanas had said.I thought you were talking about ghostheadx.It was just a mistake, don't take it personally.No wonder this confusion arose.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Cartman, I didn't realise you were talking about what AveSatanas had said.You should since it was mentioned over and over.I thought you were talking about ghostheadx.I mentioned AveSatanas many many times.It was just a mistake, don't take it personally.I know you made a mistake. You wouldn't admit it.No wonder this confusion arose.That doesn't begin to explain the confusion.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

You didn't explain the name Cartman over and over.Now go sit on the couch and smoke weed.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I mentioned his name. There wasn't anything to explain.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Both the prophet and the boxer can be called MOhammed.Both the prophet and the boxer can be called MUhammed.No, the boxer isn't just called MUhammed.Nor is the prophet just called MOhammed.You have blatantly lied.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Both the prophet and the boxer can be called MOhammed.But, I only ever referred to one of them as Mohammad.Both the prophet and the boxer can be called MUhammed.But, only one of them can be called Muhammad Ali.No, the boxer isn't just called MUhammed.Correct, he is called Muhammad Ali.Nor is the prophet just called MOhammed.Wrong. He can be referred to as just Mohammad, or just Muhammad. You weren't confused when I called him Mohammad.You have blatantly lied.No I have not.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

You said that a poster was joking saying it would be funny if the word MUhammed was used instead of MOhammed.Well, MUhammed was valid anyway.So his sarcastic comment didn't count as holding any ground. It was him creating a ruse.How is it funny and wrong (you like to claim that jokes have to be so wrong as to be against most peoples beliefs, I'm being kind in light of your original statement btw), it isn't funny nor is it wrong to claim that you can't use the word Muhammed, as that would be the correct word to use.However, the poster made a joke about replacing the word MOhammed with MUhammed, according to you.And I then discussed that, OK, lets pretend MUhammed can't really be called MUhammed as well and lets describe how your joke isn't funny, since it lacks both imagination and context.How is it funny and outrageous to believe that the prophet MUhammed is MOhammed the prophet? It isn't?Do I have to repeat myself?OK, then I will.Lets try again, if Mohammed could really only be called MUhammed the prophet and not MUhammed the prophet, it still would not be funny, within that underlying context, since he wouldn't have been taking the mick out of anybody, since nobody had ever claimed that you could or couldn't use the word MUhammed or MOhammed.Look, I just repeated myself.Do you get it?You can't joke or laud out about things that don't exist in the first place.You can't take the mick out of something that doesn't exist.Nobody Had Ever Claimed That You Aren't Or Are Allowed To Use The Word Mohammed or Muhammed!!!Seriously!!!
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

You said that a poster was joking saying it would be funny if the word MUhammed was used instead of MOhammed.I did not. Quote me saying that.However, the poster made a joke about replacing the word MOhammed with MUhammed, according to you.You stupid forgetful fucko. I did not say that. Only you have said that. I said he added the name Ali. He replaced Muhammad with Muhammad Ali.Do I have to repeat myself?You stupid forgetful fucko. You said that repeating yourself was bad.Lets try againI have corrected you multiple times.if Mohammed could really only be called MUhammed the prophet and not MUhammed the prophet, it still would not be funny, within that underlying context, since he wouldn't have been taking the mick out of anybody, since nobody had ever claimed that you could or couldn't use the word MUhammed or MOhammed.Why do you never mention the name Ali? I have said at least 20 times that the joke was using the name Ali. Look, I just repeated myself.And again, I will tell you that nobody talked about replacing the u with an o. Do you get it?You are the one who doesn't get it you stupid fucko.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Remember, Cartman, you are forgetting things.Not only is the Ali replaced with no first name, as in Ali MUhammed, the letter U is replaced with an O as well.OK, just try to remember that not only is the first name somehow replaced with no first name, you replace the O with a U.Just reminding you of your own grammar lectures, mister!Ali O!So remember the main rule of thumb, ALIO! Your favourite mnemonic!