azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

All the info that you will needFrom telephone number to address. Be creative in your denialsNot a single word about your magical branch of million secret experts... try again.8Yes, the DoE has a copy of every book published. Why not leave the basement for once and actually read something informative?As far as I remember having a book and checking it for BS are two different things...Give up. Einstein is not on your side hereI gave you link to direct translation of his private correspondence where he is mocking all religions and all views of personal gods...You on other hand said that he was religious and that he was jew trough all his life... You do not know how the government worksYou mean that I do not know about secret book agency hidden somewhere in DoE's basement??You call JSSR, JAAR and its professors and scientists flawed I call them fully incompetent in Physics.You refuse to read an article simply because of the titlewhich article?You made over 10 threads all of which you flee except for this last one does not even make sense.You are still using the same argument since your first dayBecause you failed to provide anything against them.And you call yourself an intelligent being?* Yes like to think about myself as about highly intelligent individual, which is not likely to be true in your case.You have said that the picture is magical. I have asked for evidence. You gave me none. It is not your fail, there is simply no evidence.I did check around and there are no reputable papers in any scientific databases. Nothing relevant, Just garbage on suspicious websites.Callahan's opinion on Theoretical Physics does not means anything same as yours...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Hey, nice formatting. Perfectly demonstrates how low your intelligence isNot a single word about your magical branch of million secret expertsEven a dog can formulate a better excuse than this. HAHAHA! This is so much fun. :DI gave you link to direct translation of his private correspondence where he is mocking all religions and all views of personal gods...You on other hand said that he was religious and that he was jew trough all his life...Einstein stood up and spoke against the cruelty and stupidity of the modern religion. But guess what? Even the pope hates the church.But despite their hate, they are true to their faith and made actions to improve the forms of worship. A person that speaks against blind dogma is not automatically an atheistGive up, already. History cannot lieYou mean that I do not know about secret book agency hidden somewhere in DoE's basementSecret book? LOLIt was never hidden. And the fact that even a Grade school pupil knows about it makes you even funnier. hahaha! :DYes like to think about myself as about highly intelligent individual,HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!OH MY GOD I AM ROLLING ON THE FLOOR FROM PURE LAUGHTER HAHAHAHAH!MY SIDES! I CANT BREATHE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

You are deluded cunt full of shit. I went trough your history on CD and clearly see that you try same fake evidence for your fake picture on another people... You have been always destroyed...You are pathetic.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

I can see that you stopped arguing and now reverted to tasteless insults that a little kid can do better. Just go back to what shithole you came from and never come back. Its so easy. But nevertheless...You're a great laughing stock
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (J Sci Study Relig) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell in the United States of America under the auspices of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, dedicated to publishing scholarly articles in the social sciences, including psychology, sociology and anthropology, devoted to the study of religion.Physical Review is an American peer-reviewed scientific journal established in 1893 by Edward Nichols. It publishes original research as well as scientific and literature reviews on all aspects of physicsDivided in Physical Review Cwhich deals with Nuclear PhysicsPhysical Review Dwhich deals with Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologyPhysical Review Ewhich deals with Statistical, non linear, and soft matter physicsNow, which one accepts papers on Physics and which one accepts papers on Healing rocks...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Now, which one accepts papers on Physics and which one accepts papers on Healing rocks...You pretty much explained everything about it so the better question is:What part of it does not?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I have destroyed you again... as other people did on CD .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Keep on dreaming. Im sure it will lead you somewhere
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Why I cannot find any of his papers on ant's antennas in religious papers? Why only the one about magical healing power of Tachyons? :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Next time, use proper grammar.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Also interesting how your imaginary Jody B. Smith is in one "paper" a Philosophy professor (without any link to any institution) is in another paper NASA scientist that is also impossible to Google out anything about.José Aste Tonsmann of the Mexican Center of Guadalupan Studies which is a religious institution, and with background in Enviromental Scineces (glorified gardener) used >>> satelite technology <<< :D :D :D looolRichard Kuhn - Nobel Prize winner in chemistry awarded for work on Vitamins in 1915, died 50 years ago again with no qualification for stating something like that also as usual without any record of doing so.Philip Callahan by profession entomologist (bug science) ...did infrared exam on painting :D :D Try harder :DWhat about Truck driver used cold fusion to detect black holes in her eyes :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

1. José Aste Tonsmann was a former environmental scientist but he converted into the Mexican Center of Guadalupan Studies after he failed to explain the Tilma of Guadalupe. 2. Richard Kuhn died on 1967. Scientists began to test the Tilma after Pope Pius XII gave it the title "Empress of the Americans" in 1947.3. What are you talking about? Dr. Philip Serna Callahan is a biophysicist at the University of Florida and an expert in infrared photography.Go ahead, give me more excuses. It is entertaining to watch how science will go against you.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

José Aste Tonsmann works and is paid by religious company, that is called as the picture, and that company is funded purely by religious organisations. He is paid for saying that it is magical.... sorry but are you serious :D ?Richard Kuhn his life work was on >> Vitamins<< and he never done a single paper about magic. Dr. Philip Serna Callahan http://gap.entclub.org/taxonomists/Callahan/index.html he worked on bugs mainly, he also discovered magical features of some rocks :D And detected Tachyons :D :D :DAlso "He has written two booksdealing specifically with his discoveries there of the seemingly magicalproperties of the ancient Irish round towers and of certain rocks and rockpowders.This is common for religious hoaxes, They use a name o scientist that exists and it is possible to see his name on first page of google search but if you check deeper you will see that the scientist works in completely unrelated field and most likely never even heard about the picture. Same with the NASA scientist that does not even exists.Only one who does "research" on that picture is Tosmann who is paid for promoting it's magical properties." :D :D :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

You can be sued for what you just said. If you claim that Jose Aste is being bribed, then you need some valid evidences for that. Do you have one?Indeed, Richard Kuhn never worked on magic, only facts. And the Guadalupe is a factual evidence of the paranormal.Dr. Philip Serna CallahanQoute from your article:"He is the author of 106 scientific papers and 12 books on science and a full professor on the graduate faculty of the University of Florida. He is one of 5% of U.S. Scientists in the Who’s Who of Technology today. He retired from the USDA on June 20, 1986, and is now on the staff of the Olive W. Garvey Center for the improvement of Human Functioning, Inc., Wichita, Kansas as an infrared systems and low energy consultant."Dr. Callahan explains that a particle moving faster than the speed of light is called a tachyon, and a message sent by such a particle would actually arrive before it was sent. He also states that he published, in 1986, the first experimental proof that tachyon particles actually exist. (One of the world's great unsolved mysteries is why Dr. Callahan has never been honored with the Nobel Prize in physics for such an amazing and historic achievement.)His background are both insects and physics, made major contributions in the field of science and a very well respected figure with valid studies about his claims.Where is the fault in his study again?Thats funny. You actually think that anyone can just point out a random person as witness? LOL Do you even understand how a person can be arrested for such an act? Can you even comprehend how the government ensures that every published book actually contains real facts?Thousands of publishers and authors has been sued for false information. And yet, the books about Gualupe remains untouched. Gee..I wonder why.P.SCan you be more creative in your denials? Im starting to get sick of you already.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

First he works with bugs, to be more accurate he is studying bugs behavior, nothing to do with painting at all. Second his biology background excludes any work of Theoretical Physics at all, Also his paper on Tachyon is a BS... he was "detecting" tachyons by connecting standard electro meter to a ficus plant... I think that is self explanatory...Book on Gualupe are religious stuff, they cannot be sued for being hoaxes. Also what is important there never were taken samples from that picture. Otherwise we both know that it would end up quickly as Turin did...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Richard Kuhn is dead for 50 years and there is no record that he ever said anything about that Picture.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Looks like someone skipped the other scientists. Whats the problem? Cat got your tongue?1. He is called "Biophysicist" because he knows how biology works. The Tilma of Guadalupe was made from the fibers of cactus that should have easily decomposed, but it didn't. Which is why he was calledDoesnt mean your passion are insects, doesnt mean you dont know how plants work.2. Qoute from your source says:"Dr. Callahan explains that a particle moving faster than the speed of light is called a tachyon, and a message sent by such a particle would actually arrive before it was sent. He also states that he published, in 1986, the first experimental proof that tachyon particles actually exist"Which means that despite the ridiculousness, he proved his claims with solid evidences.Religious books cannot be sued for inaccuracy? Really? Last time I checked, thousands of publishers had their licenses removed just because of mistranslations.The Guadalupe books involved the names of real men. If ever there was anything false, the government would easily ban it from public use. Its been more than 30 years but nothing happened.Try harder. You are not entertaining anyone.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Jose Aste is an employee of a company that makes money from spreading myths about that picture.He is as credible as neoNazi historians denying Holocaust.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Evidence please.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

by self explanatory you mean " I don't know how stuff works therefore it was done by magic..." :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Thats cute, very original
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I know :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

yes, and?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

You have sent your "you are cute..." as a Dispute ... I didn't know what to reply :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Can you offer unbiased evidence ?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

it was never tested in independent laboratory, just another fraud. They never even borrowed that to Randi's institution. It is evidence of miracle as me saying that I can walk trough walls (but I am not going to show you, you have to believe that)...I would like something more ... I don't know ... real?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

What are you talking about?It was tested by certified scientists-including Nobel prize winners and NASA itself. The documents are readily available online.Many have tried to disprove the Guadalupe, all of them failed.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I would like to see evidence that NASA has tested it. I want to see laboratory reports, not random peoples opinion. No random articles lab reports.I can write article that I was been tested by NASA, JPL, ESA DARPA... and all of them examined me and sai that I can walk trough walls...Would My article about Me being tested, enough for you to believe me that I can walk trough the walls?I don't think so...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Here you go Its on page 4
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

It is same as random web article. No link to labs, lab statements, I say too that I was tested by NASA and they confirmed that I can walk trough walls.Do you want it in PDF ? ###NASA confirms that Mathele can walk trough walls and latest NASA lab tests shown that Mathlete can also fly!###see? now I have NASA confirmation that I can walk trough the walls.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

This one provided links for the study Check the references for it
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I have checked most of them. They are irrelevant/proprietary/doggy or just statements of random people. This is not how scientific examination is done.I also cannot find links to anything from NASA. I have sent request to NASA's library, asking if they ever heard about that painting.In your PDF is mentioned that the picture is made from materials that are not present on Earth, which laboratory did it? How many new different materials or elements were discovered? What are the properties of those new materials?. Where it was published?It seems to be made up fake.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

I also cannot find links to anything from NASA.Why would NASA publish a report that proves God?All scientists who converted after testing the Guadalupe were all rejected from the scientific community. Gee, I wonder why?In your PDF is mentioned that the picture is made from materials that are not present on Earth, which laboratory did it?None. It was done by individual scientists such as: Dr. Philip Callahan- biophysicist, USDA entomologist and NASA consultantRichard Kuhn - Biochemist and Nobel Prize winner in Physics for 1945and Dr. Jose Aste Tonsmann - ophthalmologistDenial can only take you so far
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Why would NASA publish a report that proves God?All scientists who converted after testing the Guadalupe were all rejected from the scientific community. Gee, I wonder why?Means nothing in real world. I read articles "NASA proves that Islam is the only true religion", all same fake as the PDF.After brief Googling I discovered:""Dr. Philip Callahan"" There are two people with that name. First is Physicist working for NASA (on Radar systems) and has nothing to do with the fake thing.Second is a discredited weird man known for love to ghosts, magic, healing stones and by qualification he is Entomologist. That means that his area of study does not involves material sciece and he is not working for NASA he is working on ants and how they communicate and in spare time he writes funny books about the power of healing rocks...""Richard Kuhn"" did not won Nobel prize in Physics but in Chemistry and that for discovery of several vitamins. Most important is there is no evidence that he ever examined that painting.Dr. Jose Aste Tonsmann is not ophthalmologist but old system engineer who worked on maps in IBM...All you gave me means nothing. Why there are no independent testing institutes involved? Why so much fake?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Dr. Philip Callahan"" There are two people with that name. First is Physicist working for NASA (on Radar systems) and has nothing to do with the fake thing.Second is a discredited weird man known for love to ghosts, magic, healing stones and by qualification he is Entomologist"in 1979 Philip Callahan, (biophysicist, USDA entomologist, NASA consultant) specializing in infrared imaging, was allowed direct access to visually inspect, and photograph, the image. He took numerous infrared photographs of the front of the tilma. Taking notes that were later published, his assistant noted that the original art work was neither cracked nor flaked, while later additions (gold leaf, silver plating the moon) showed serious signs of wear, if not complete deterioration. Callahan could not explain the excellent state of preservation of the un-retouched areas of the image on the tilma, particularly the upper two-thirds of the image. His findings, with photographs, were published in 1981."-Wikipedia"Richard Kuhn"" did not won Nobel prize in Physics but in Chemistry and that for discovery of several vitamins. Most important is there is no evidence that he ever examined that painting."in 1936 biochemist Richard Kuhn analyzed a sample of the fabric and announced that the pigments used were from no known source, whether animal, mineral or vegetable"-WikipediaDr. Jose Aste Tonsmann is not ophthalmologist but old system engineer who worked on maps in IBM...Then in 1929 and 1951 photographers found a figure reflected in the Virgin's eyes; upon inspection they said that the reflection was tripled in what is called the Purkinje effect, commonly found in human eyes.[54] An ophthalmologist, Dr. Jose Aste Tonsmann, later enlarged an image of the Virgin's eyes by 2500x and claimed to have found not only the aforementioned single figure, but images of all the witnesses present when the tilma was first revealed before Zumárraga in 1531, plus a small family group of mother, father, and a group of children, in the center of the Virgin's eyes, fourteen people in all-WikipediaStop embarrasing yourself. The evidences are right in front of you
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Still being dishonest I see. Here your opponent notes that some data is unsourced, you use a wiki link to say it is despite your source backing Mathletes claim, you just omit that part so it appears toback you.Bold is mathletes italics is yours."Richard Kuhn"" did not won Nobel prize in Physics but in Chemistry and that for discovery of several vitamins. Most important is there is no evidence that he ever examined that painting."in 1936 biochemist Richard Kuhn analyzed a sample of the fabric and announced that the pigments used were from no known source, whether animal, mineral or vegetable"-WikipediaSee where you started your quote? You left out what was right before it. Here is what you left out.http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OurLadyof_Guadalupe#References"Numerous Catholic websites repeat an unsourced claim[56] that in 1936 biochemist Richard Kuhn analyzed a sample of the fabric and announced that the pigments used were from no known source, whether animal, mineral or vegetable."More evidence of your lack of credibility concerning the evidence on this subject. Your arguments are littered with these types of falsehoods as well as others. buh by;)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

sighHere are the discussions for it Ctrl+F + Richard KuhnIt is unsourced but they cannot prove it false either. I left it out to remain on track. But thanks for asking
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

So he raises the issue of it being unsourced....so you completely ignore that, and to" remain on track" you repost the assertion he was contending, minus the part that confirms your opponents skepticism. So it doesn't matter your opponent found a legitimate contention with a piece of evidence you are just going to re assert the same evidence without addressing his point against it.Your logic there makes no sense. It makes more sense that you made a dishonest move to attempt to make it appear as if the evidence was sourced. If not why bother answer his question with your method at all? At the veryleast this is another example of you ignoring (until you were caught) a legitimate issue with your evidence. In the name of remaining on track...whatever track ignores legitimate claims of skeptifism if I were to hazard a guess. But you still continue with this assertion in spite of having no evidence to back your position....and try poor logic to justify your action.Your logic continues to make no sense as you then assert "but they cannot prove it false either." As if that has any bearing on the claim. It is called shifting the burden of proof, for an example look up "Russels teapot". To prove a claim as true one needs to support the claim, not being able to disprove it doesn't prove the original claim to be true.For instance, just because a believer or non believer cannot prove a diety to be true or false does not support the oppositions side.For instance I do not ask you to prove you're honest and using good logic in these matters, I just keep showing evidence to the contrary to back my claim.Your last post is another example of your use of fallacies to support your evidence. Burden of proof fallacy in case you missed it. buh by;)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Its simple:I hate having to argue about something that cannot be proven, nor disproven. I am willing to listen if you have something to add to the argument, though
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

So far you haven't listened at all. What are the chances you listen later?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I heard that Albert Einstein went to check and he said it was totally fake. I don't have a source for that information, but you can't prove me wrong either.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Wikipedia articles are written by random people. It is not evidence for anything. That is why people names do not fit with their qualification.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Then check the references.Stop denying already. You know that it wont take you anywhere
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

References do not leads to any independent material lab .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Yes it does, apparentlyHow long do you plan to deny the elephant in the room?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Which of those references (please give me a number) leads to independent lab?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

sighCheck #s 1,3,4,6,78,10.That should be enough research to convince you that the Guadalupe was tested, and proven.