azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

An afterlife,as colorful,wonderful,poetic and ideal as it seems,should remain but one of the mysterious unanswered questions in this life.when people believe in an afterlife,it tends to comfort them greatly,give them security and reassurance in knowing that their dead are probably having a better time that they are.People who don't believe are faced with the acceptance of the horror of death,the belief that there is absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel.well,unless you believe in reincarnation,but that's another story.people who wonder have the entire spectrum of possibilities to consider and in having that they may not find peace,or they may and the uncertainty is exhilarating.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

In my opinion, no. I don't believe we have any type of "soul" that floats around waiting to consummate somewhere else or whatever. Makes no sense to me. I think death just IS, and that's that. You die, and the end. There's no blackness to look at because you're dead. But I do get how depressing my perception is. Everyone wants to believe we have a soul within us that'll never die and people that live beyond us, will be able to sense it or enjoy their life thinking we're not completely "dead."
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

I was not aware of a beforelife so there's no reason to think I'll be aware of an afterlife.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

I don't believe in it.I think humans are just so into themselves that they can't accept that our conciousness is a random compelation if electric pulses in our own heads. When that stops, we die and our conciousness goes with it. But from the time we a babies in the womb till the day we die, we are all we really know and have for certain. And even some people don't really know themselves.It's a comfort to imagine that this isn't all we have, just like God is a comfort. Like your parents telling you tales of faeries that protect you from monsters under the bed, religion tells us that God has a plan and is protecting you from randomness and uncertainty.Not that it's not a good thing that most people think this way. For the most part people who believe that there is an afterlife are kind to others in this life in holes of a better afterlife. For that I am greatful, although I wish that it didn't have to be that way and others could be kind for the sake of being kind alone.However, you can never be certain. So I always say a prayer if someone dies or I see roadkill on the street, et cetera. Because had they been religious, whatever religion that may be, they probably would have wanted someone to say a prayer for them.I may not believe in religion or prayer, but I respect other's need for it.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

We are all energy , essence and matter, We are all molecular globs. Our soul is lighter and does continue. I believe that the tunnel of light is not just death , but birth also .Afterlife does exist. Its more awsome than "heaven" , its electrical , its hard to explain , almost magical in its appearance , though it is lucid.Religion and Prayer has nothing to do with it. :)
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: questionable

Read my argument below. We are not talking about death of consciousness alone. Consciousness is being conscious of sensations. So if somehow the sense organs stop working, consciousness will not be evident. But a personality is not just consciousness. It is a conglomerate of several factors. We have volitions, perceptions, ideas, emotions, and so much more. So we need to understand exactly what a "personality" really is. I also think we need to carefully examine what we mean by a sense of personality, a sense of "I" with regard to some particular thing. Until we understand these things well, whether we believe in life after death or not is irrelevant. To make a scientific analysis of this matter we need to understand nature as she actually is. Until then, we can only say that we have no scientific evidence of any phenomenon that proves that the sense of personality is somehow sustained after death. We seem to have some startling observations made on little children, but the study of the phenomenon is still not fully developed.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

I suppose "after-death" would be a lot like "before birth". Does anybody here remember what it was like before they were born? Of course not, you didn't exist and when you die, you won't exist either. There is no "sitting there and watching blackness" because you are non-existent, you can't see anything not even black.The burden of proof is on those who say there is an afterlife.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: yes

The burden of proof is on those who say there is an afterlife.OMG Arent you a damning individual.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

Damning? In what way?I am merely stating how debate works. The affirmative belief always carries the burden of proof. If there is an afterlife, no evidence has been presented.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

Im sorry , i guess debate-wise this sort of thing cannot be proven . What a book , religion says etc , isnt proof eitherway.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

Um, yes....I am glad that we can both agree on that. Books can be used but only if their statements can be corroborated with evidence.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

True .
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

How would we know? And why does it matter? And what keeps us from going out like a light, switch and it's off and gone and no more?
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

I think it is best, especially since most people agree that we don't know, to behave as if this was our only stretch. We need to make the best of the one life we are certain about.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

There is no evidence that would support the claim that there is an afterlife, however there is evidence to support the claim there is no afterlife.Let's establish that life is generally considered as biological activity in an entity (i.e. rocks are not alive, they are geological not biological entities), and in humans, life is considered the presence of thought (i.e. brain dead people are not often considered alive). Neurological activity of the brain is dependent on the physical matter that composes it. Upon death, this matter degrades and loses its structure and ability to function as before. This is death. There is no life after death because that is what death is, the end of life.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

I dont understand why those who exclaim their belief in an afterlife are so arrogant they do not see that -THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE - is a prime factor. If the question appended - "only people who can show evidence may reply" - then there would be NO replies from those who hold the view - there is an afterlife.Likewise the over the top claims on - solar flares - earth billions of years old -Matter - Anti - Matter etc, is irrelevant. The onus is on those who believe in the afterlife to show evidence. This can not be done. So obviously you live in hope and if this is the case you should state this. Dont over complicate the question, show any evidence and i will be on your side in a flash.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: Absolutely

I dont understand why those who exclaim their belief in an afterlife are so arrogant they do not see that -THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE - is a prime factor. And I don't understand why those who exclaim their belief in no afterlife say that those who belief in afterlife are arrogant. Don't be talking about others "absence of evidence" unless you, yourself are ready to supply evidence. Debating is about supplying evidence, not criticizing others points. "only people who can show evidence may reply"  If that where the case, their would be no replies at all. Don't criticize, evidize ;)
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

My point, clearly stated, is that for this particular question the fact no evidence can be produced would render there being no answers if the question included "ONLY PEOPLE WHO CAN SHOW EVIDENCE MAY REPLY" the whole crux of the question "IS THERE AN AFTERLIFE"? has been answered by some in the affirmative !!The question did not ask - "do you BELIEVE or DESIRE for an AFTERLIFE"!!I have no problem with people who BELIEVE or WISH for an afterlife or anything else if it makes them whole or feel good. I have not said that I DO NOT BELIEVE in an afterlife. I have simply stated that those who are adamant there is an afterlife have no way of proving it. and as is often the case they are affronted when their argument is challenged.I think it arrogant to state - "THERE IS AN AFTERLIFE". it implies that person has absolute proof, how else do you affirm that something does exist??There is no requirement (upon me) to provide evidence of "NO AFTERLIFE".The clue is in the first word - "NO" !!!!!
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: yes

Ok, gotcha. All I was saying was instead of saying something against the people who have opposing/different beliefs as you, give evidence of your side. Or just don't post at all. There is no requirement (upon me) to provide evidence of "NO AFTERLIFE". There may not be, but then again if you don't plan on supplying any thoughts about the topic, why post? The reason one should post on one side of a debate is to do just that, debate. This is after all a debate website :) The clue is in the first word - "NO" !!!!!I'm not really understanding the clue...
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: yes

hmmm, so then the pyramids did not exist before you, they are just here now because you can see them and validate them, but there was no life before you? after you? no evidence to support it, perhaps you should give it another think as philosophy differs from sceintific opinion. Life, is a window.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: yes

EVIDENCE!!! do you think that you exist? now? are you alive? is the reflection in the mirror proof of ones self? are you a creation of your own imagination and all throughout your life just your creation too? what is life? science says that it is impossible to live or be alive without water, oxygen, and seemingly mild climates. do you think earth is a goldylocks planet? hard to know what to beleive isnt it. can you see your reflection in the mirror? is it real? an illusion? is it what you want to see? IS IT REAL? your spirit self staring back at you in the mirror cannot be touched of felt, it cannot suffer or experience love, hate, fear, or happiness. the you inside the mirror can never be hungry. but you can be hungry you know what hungry is, it is life the spirit that is never hungry wanted to feel and to know and it was.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: No

Just found this thread that has been dormant for a couple years. Is anyone still looking?Occum's razor applies here: the simplest explanation is usually the right one. We can mostly explain life as we know it, from the evolution of proteins and DNA, to the existence of prokariotic life forms like bacteria, to eukaryotic protazoa and then multi-cellular life forms, some with brains, gaining complexity until you have sentient beings that ask a lot of existential questions. Evolution is reactionary, not striving for a purpose (the purpose is to propagate, but evolution is a response to existing (though changing) environments). We can explain this with a biological system that fits the evidence, and this system does not require an afterlife (or a creator) to work and to make sense. It also does not preclude the existence of a creator or an afterlife. Occums razor would tell us, though, that it is most probable that the system as evidence describes it is more or less complete and therefore that it is improbable that there is an afterlife. I do not believe there till be an afterlife, but I cannot say there is not one. Those that believe in an afterlife do so with faith in something perfectly possible, but improbable.
Debate: Is there an "afterlife" after death?
Side: Absolutely

oh and uh, well the evidence. you see, the evidence is in the mirror!
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Social and online media is part of the today's world. Online learning, when designed right, seamlessly integrates the students' everyday experiences with their learning experiences.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Much easier than to sit through an hour class trying not to fall asleep while listening to a professor who basically reviews what you just read out of class anyways. I like not having time constraints as well. Depends on the teacher, but for the most part, I find it easier to get better grades online than in the classroom.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Many argue both sides of the same point when it comes to web-based instruction. Take a look at this article: http://www.worldwidelearn.com/education-articles/benefits-of-online-learning.htm.  WBI allows students to have constant access to their course and materials. They are not hindered by schedules and time constraints, and can work at their own pace in most situations. This flexibility allows more students to obtain an education, and allows students to have a bigger role in their own learning.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Pro: Flexibility Online learning allows students the flexibility to stay at home and work on their classwork. You can work online anytime, anywhere. You can work in your pajamas or even at another job on your break. You can stay home and take care of your kids if you need to.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

The biggest pro that my group decided on was Flexibility. With students being so busy these days with full time jobs, families, and life, it is sometimes hard to fit in graduate school. Being able to work online and go at your own pace is essential. I like the fact that I can work on my homework on my own time, even if it means doing it in my PJ's at midnight!
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

The Uriartes and myself met tonight to discuss the pros and cons of online learning. We all agreed that the most important pro about online learning is ACCESSIBILITY. The accessibility of online learning makes what wasn't possible before, possible. It brings learning to your bedside, to the coffee house, across the nation, around the world. It makes resources accessible that could never have been reached before. It makes learning available any time, any day, any where. How can any "con" top that?
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

I support this view. We talked, typed, about it for a bit and we decided that ACCESSIBILITY was the best pro about on line learning. We also talked about technical issues being a con but it wasn't as strong as the pro we decided to go with.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

During our chat, Tony and I discussed many of the pros and cons to online education. We both agreed that one of the major pros to web-based instruction is the increased access to education. As students, we are able to see firsthand how online education gives us access to our instructor(s), classmates, materials, and technologies. We were able to chat from across the world, as he was in Kazakstan and I was in New Jersey. The online environment allows learners to access course materials 24/7 from anywhere with Internet access. In addition to course access, the Internet provides students with access to endless materials, contacts, visuals, and other information.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Pros1. Accessible to more people.2. Can go at your own pace3. Less distractions (coughing, class clowns, pulled fire alarms, the pretty girl sitting next to you, etc.)Cons1. Easy to turn on the TV or get distracted by some other comfort of the home.2. Too easy to cheat (if we're talking about a degree program, and not just someone who wants to learn something)
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Now as a Pro to the debate I have to say that many students need this option as it is the only way they can complete a degree. If they work full time and the class is only offered when they are at work, that makes it impossible to finish. I have had a student in this situation. So online programs can be a blessing to many as long as they are self starter and non-procrastinator. Many classes could be adapted to online versions if done well. It is just that many classes put online are not "online" classes just classroom based with materials posted online.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

As a mom of a new baby who needs to take a few courses to update my teaching certificate, I cannot be more pleased with online education. The flexibility allows me to complete the courses when my baby sleeps (which is not on a reliable schedule). I don't have to incur babysitting fees or daycare costs because I can work whenever I want. I also like that everything is in one place in the sense that to work all I need to do is sit down at my laptop. No books, notebooks, papers, pens, etc.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

The nature of the hybrid or online course leads to self pacing and individualized instruction (i.e. differentiated instruction). This then leads to greater flexibility for both the teacher of the course and the student in the course.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Online courses have opened up education to many people who would have had to made major lifestyle changes to access a college degree. Mary and I discussed the following pros. Online courses allow students from anywhere to study anywhere and anytime that fits into their schedule. This allows parents with young children, people who work, and individuals who live too far away from a college campus to earn a college degree.A second pro with online courses is they allow students time to construct their responses giving everyone an equal chance to participate in discussion, and constructing meaning from the content from the shyest to the most outgoing students.Debbie and Mary
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

After the debate me and my partner decided that the biggest pro is access. Neither of us would be able to continue our education in this degree if the classes were not held online. Students that are in school districts that do not fit their needs have more options with the accessibility of online learning.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Mike Heinz, Anthony Serafini and myself met in chat yesterday (Sunday Sept. 13th) and discussed this topic. We discussed several things that we felt were pros to Web Based Instruction. The ones we settled on was the flexibility of offering WBI as well as the increased access to education (access to instructor, classmates, instructional materials etc...). As far as flexibility was concerned we all agreed that the ability to work at your own pace was important aspect of flexibility, but the fact that students could review the instructional materials as many times as necessary was the most attractive aspect of WBI
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Online instruction provides access to novel experiences which students may not have overwise had, ie. technology experiences, interacting with new people, learning material not available at their schools.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

In science I can do so much more to tap into the learning styles of individual students. I can post articles for students to read and report back about. I can post links to virtual lab activities and have them write a formal lab report just as if they had done the lab in the classroom. By posting videos, I can also link to more relevant information than I have ever been able to tap into in my 18 years of teaching. Another pro is the fact that I can modify each assesment to truly measure and record student success. By giving authentic feedback on each topic I am assured of setting measureable, reachable goals for each student. Have I been able to accomplish all of this? Not yet - but we are working toward that goal.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

The biggest advantage to learning online is the cost-effectiveness of the instruction. Rural schools could not offer AP classes for students because it would require hiring one teacher for only a handful of students. Also, online courses cut down on overhead costs for institutions, travel costs for students, daycare expensive, physical campus costs, and the overall time savings for travel. In addition, less time would be wasted waiting around for the next class, and natural resources could be saved by cutting down commuting. Online classes can help reduced our congested highways and keep us personal safer from car accidents and campus shootings (VA Tech would agree). Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction. EducationalTechnology & Society, 7 (4), 167-175.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Online learning has lots of pros. First of all it is useful for students who live far away from the university or college. Sometimes it is really difficult to reach the university every single day. Secondly it is useful because you will definitely save your time learning at home by your computer. You can feel comfortably and learn at the same moment. I can see only pros in this way of learning so let's hope that soon it will be the normal practice in many universities.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Pros

Although online learning has its disadvantages, the most common being distraction for students, low effectivity, and of course eye strain and other side effects. I think it is still a relief, a way of continuing learning during the pandemic. There are ways to overcome these difficulties also.But when offline learning will be possible, it is much better for the development of the student, and more enjoyable.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Cons

They say there is usually "two sides to every story". There are many pros to web-based instruction, but there are some cons or hurdles to overcome as well. Tony and I agreed that a learner with little or no motivation would have a major disadvantage in the online education environment. In order for students to be successful in an online course, they need to be motivated, self-starters, responsible, and able to stay on task. Learners who need hand holding do not get all that they can out of a course. They fall behind, become frustrated, and do not engage in deep learning. This is not to say that this type of learner could not succeed in an online class, it would just be more difficult.
Debate: Pros and Cons of Web-Based Instruction
Side: Cons

As a Con one can talk about the courses that really don't work for online instruction. Unless you can have face to face real time interaction with the instructor. For example many students sign up to take their Math classes online (mostly pre-College Algebra level) and end up dropping and try desperately to get into classroom courses. Math when difficult for students as it is, is even harder when online with no interaction. Students need to see whats being done and ask questions during the lesson to say "wait I got lost there can you back up one step and re-explain."