azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Have you seen the terrible excuses for cartoons they have on tv these days? Every one of which is all about loving and caring for each other. When I was a kid none of us wanted to watch that boring crap; we wanted to see exciting cartoons, ones we could cheer to! And I can confidently say that I didn't turn into a sadistic murderer. I don't think kids cartoons should be as violent as some R rated films by any means, but these days people (mainly the government and hypocritical parents that loved this stuff when they were a kid and are now saying it's bad) have turned into soft pussy's. A lot of adults think that banning such material is protecting the children, which in course turns them into -to put it lightly- softies! Someone that can't fend for themselves in the REAL WORLD. In the real world people aren't all about hugs and kisses and making friends; there is resentment, hate and plenty of violence. I don't think kids should be exposed to all of those things at such a young age, but they need to have some knowledge of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Also banning material is censorship - and censorship is SHIT!
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

It depends on what kind of violent cartoons you are talking about what kind of cartoons are you saying are violent?
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

There's a bit of childish bullkaka going on in this debate, serial downvoting with no dispute, all by the debate moderator. If you can't defend a point I'd advise not trying to argue it with a community of intelligent and highly opinionated people. Also beware that down-voting reduces your own points.I don't mind being down-voted, especially with a valid dispute, after all it's in the spirit of debate.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Well the cartoons suck now, why? NO VIOLENCE! That's how most cartoons got so popular because they had lots of violence, now they think that kids are too stupid and would try that stuff at home! THEY ARE NOT THAT STUPID LIKE YOU THINK!
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Joey from Full House said something important. I don't know exactly what he said but im going to wing it.....Children cannot imitate the violence of cartoons. Im going to say that children, sometimes, cannot imitate the violence of cartoons. What Joey was saying is that a child cannot move a 600 ton boats and let it fall on his/her sibling. Or a little boy who drives a car over his older sister....tho that is possible...Highly unprobable. lol. Bugz Bunny was violent. Yes, i typed Bugz. No type. I remember i imitated him and it wasn't violent. I would say kinda sexual. I mean, when i was a young kid i had this idea to kiss my older brother on the lips really quicks like how Bugz do it. Is it sexual? Physical. Yes. And i regret it. I think i was about younger than 12. I say if your child gets violent, close of the television. Violent cartoons have been on television for years. Maybe it is a contributor to children's violence. LETS DO RESEARCH!
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Since when did anyone became so concern about ciolate cartoons?! thats the last thing anyone should be worry about after so many years of cartoons showing violence during most of their episodes. Stop worring about petty things like "Viloent cartoons" and try to focus more on the real things thats actually affecting the younger generation.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

cartoons have to be there or kids will never learn what it looks like when u get shot so they don't do it
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

When I see Tom dropping an anvil on Jerry or Wily Coyote shooting Roadrunner with a missile, I don't really take that to heart and go shoot up a school. But that's just me. Newsflash uptight, overprotective parents: Animals hitting each other with frying pans and irons is funny.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

If the parent KNOWS that it is violent, then they should not let the kid watch. Remember parents! ALWAYS watch the show before you let your kids watch and respect the rating. It helps. List of cartoons that are violent or known for being violent :Happy Tree FriendsFamily GuySimpsons Cleveland ShowRobot Chicken But all of these are ADULT CARTOONS which you should not be letting a kid watch anyway.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Teaching children how to distinguish between reality and fiction is a far cheaper and more guaranteed alternative to banning entire media. If a child knows the difference between reality and fiction the less likely he is to enact fiction in reality.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

As long as the parents explain to their children that what they see in those violent cartoons is wrong, then I have no problem with it.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Speaking of Violent Cartoons... It's been that way for a long while, unless you're saying Tom & Jerry is totally not violent even though it shows the cat & mouse hurting each other with explosives, firearms, and traps (that backfire a lot).If you worry about kids doing what's in those violent cartoons, you'd mostly have to worry about those youngsters which don't know what's appropriate and what isn't. If a kid sees something they shouldn't be seeing, as long as they know that "it's something they shouldn't be seeing", they should be fine although the times we should stop kids from watching the stuff that's not for their age (like things with sexual content in it). That's probably one of the only times we stop them before they watch it.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Modern children's cartoons are less violent now then they ever were, the violence in them is always matched with a moral message or a triumph over an obviously evil adversary. In juxtaposition older cartoons showed violence as mechanism for amusement or for comedic effect, often with racial, misogynistic or stereotypical overtones, at times overtly.This sort of argument crops up with every generation and is not limited to cartoons. Music and film have the same sort of criticism, as does printed media.There's always some retro-thinking pedants wanting to stamp out the fun altogether.
Debate: Violent cartoons
Side: Legalization violent cartoons

Children need violence somewhere in their day to make up for the fact that they aren't apart of a hunter-gatherer society where they are taught to hunt from the day they could hold a bow or chuck a spear.Stop this 'child worship' and actually let them grow!We're making our children emotionally weak by sheltering them from the horrible truths of the world! If they don't understand what things in the world are horrible, how will they ever have the want to make the horrible things in the world come to an end when they grow up?Children do not want to become firefighters and policemen for no reason. They want to become those things because those jobs stop people from being hurt or killed. They wouldn't learn about these things nor have the desire to become these things if they have no idea of what violence is.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Music, like any art is a growing, changing, evolving life form. It breathes, it flourishes, it rebels, and it even sleeps at times. What makes great hits so great has more to do with popularity than with actual music itself. Newer generations don’t always enjoy music that was popular in the past; this doesn’t mean they don’t appreciate good music just that they live in a different time and environment. Music of the past may not speak to people the way it spoke to those who were around during the inspirational timeframe it was created in. Music often times carries with it a particular essence, not just in the lyrics but in the very notes played, which is distinctive for the time in which it was crafted. Current events, cultural differences, new technology, all play a big part in influencing the style of music and that comes with a significant amount of appreciation from those people currently being affected by those same influences.Considering the vast diversity of contemporary music available, I think anyone would be hard pressed to seriously sit down and not find something they enjoy listening to after honest consideration. At which point I say to hell with popularity.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

What does "today's music" even mean? Just the hits? Because that doesn't even represent 1% of what's being produced. "Today's Music" includes access to virtually any sound conceivable, includes new instruments (such as the Hang) and production and distribution methods we could barely conceive of when I was born. Will today's songs still be played in 20, 50, 100 years? I don't know, but would that even really be necessarily a good thing? Music, and all art, should be constantly evolving in pace with the evolving world anyway.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Kind of a yes and no question. The music of modern culture isn't great I mean just look at the charts they're terrible especially compared to what used to be in the charts and what was once popular but that doesn't mean that all of the music of today is absolutely terrible. I mean just look at the music artists like coldplay, muse, snow patrol, 30 seconds to mars, the narrative, motion city soundtrack, 12 stones (I could go on forever). Those artists have come out with songs fairly recently (some more recently than others) and I have not found fault with them and do prefer them to older music. If this was only about what has become modern culture music for example one direction, pitbull, rihanna and so on, then I would definitely say no because the music that I hear in the charts or on the radio is just appalling (blurred lines being an example)
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

I'm sure that I can't make an objective answer to this question, but I think that it's worth noting that the only "old" music that we remember now are the ones that we listened to the most ie the good ones.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

True of course.. But what "good" songs in today's music will be remembered?? Please try and name me some!!
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Eiffel 65- I'm BlueJimmy Eat World- The MiddleOutkast- Hey yaShaggy- It wasn't meSublime- SanteriaJack Johnson- Upside DownJohn Mayer- Waiting on the World to ChangeThe Fray- How to Save a LifeThese aren't just relatively recent hits, (most within 10 years, all within 20) these will be talked about for decades to come. If you remember some of these from your childhood, that further reinforces the scope of my earlier claim.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

I'm cinda confused, what do you mean. Are you siding with the nowadays music and saying few old songs were good or that old music had some good hits or what?
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

For now, I'm simply asserting that modern music has plenty of hits that will be remembered, since this can be easily proven.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Trust me, all these mordern song are just a fad and will die off before you know it.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

I m sorry but I have never heard of ny of these. But I won't presume they're not good songs just because I haven't heard them xDIf they are truly revolutionary and have changed the course of music, then I will be all too happy to induct them in to the halls of fame. But I just don't see it happening. Bach, or the Beatles- they will always be remembered. Miley Cyrus and Ed Sheeran? I think not..
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Would I call them revolutionary? Nah. I'm saying that there have been good "modern" songs that we will remember.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Remembered by who? The internet pretty much as every song ever made and played recorded. Technically speaking every song will be remembered forever.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Played on the radio, talked about in television shows and books, taught about in schools e.t.c.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

None of that applies to any old music. Maybe Bach, and the other great composers, but no one from the rock, metal, and even rap history would apply.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Not true.I see documentaries, TV programs, learn about them in school, hear them on the radio, see articles in magazines, etc.I'm talking about the Beatles ya know xD
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Generally documentaries are made about people and or things long since gone.So that's not really a valid source, since every old artist who makes so much as an international splash will get a documentary.Tv programs such as what?I've never heard about the Beatles in school, nor any other rock artist, maybe It's a British thing.I don't listen to the radio...
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

TV programs like a re-run of "It was 40 years ago today" a documentary which I watched a couple of days ago on Chanel 4, on yesterday- countless programs called "Sounds of the Sixties", and yeah, we learned about the Beatles in my music class when I took music- they were the key focus for like a month. And no, I don't know wtf you're on about when you talk abut documentaries being about things long since gone.. You have have documentaries in regards to future technological thingies, documentaries about a disaster that has stricken the world somewhere, wildlife documentaries, e.t.c.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Well yes I too learned about music in music class, I can't recall any specific non composer artists, but I know we often went over the history of music. We also played some songs from today, such hits as "Beautiful girls" by Sean Kingston, "call me maybe" by Carly Rae Jepson, and even "Moving mountains" by Usher. What does that say about the music we're being taught? Not that it's good or bad, but that it's what some people like, or don't.I don't watch tv either, sorry so I don't know about any programs that might host modern artists.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Hmm, well.. MTV shows them o.O But of course modern artists are shown on modern TV. I just doubt tey will be in 50 years xDLook, any song that comes out in nowadays, lasts about a week. A month tops. After that, you're considered out off fashion if you like it and it gets forgotten. Because they're not original, not artistic, not interesting anymore, they just aren't good. Unlike music from the past which, upon release, was listened to consistently until the next track from that artist came out, and then they'd listen to both.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Historically speaking people actually used to buy physical copies of their favorite artists music, because if it was worth listening to, it could only be heard one way since Yt nor the internet existed. So in the way of how old artists had their music bought and listened to consecutively I'll put that up to a different time, different society.Now as for MTV, again arises the issue of me not watching tv. I'll just have to take your word for that one. MTv was actually part of the main reason I stopped watching tv. I could only take so much "teen mom" while I'm looking for music videos.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Completely subjectively I must say yes. Of the old songs I know of, I might like one out of every ten, that compared to music I've listened to growing up, even to now I've heard countless songs out of countless songs that I like.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

That's because those are the song that surround you. These are the song that your friends listen to and are trending. Look up some old music, there's some good stuff. It's just not shoved in your face like the music of this time.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

If I have to search for it it's not that memorable now is it? Why is no one just referring me to some, or rather to some that I enjoy?
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

That's because stuff trending is stupid. Crap like tweaking, Draun Sandstorm, and all that trending crap is what everyone is talking about. People are stupid so they are always talking about this dumb and addictive shit. Basically everything nowadays is is stupid crap. I miss older life.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Why are people stupid? You must base your claims in some truth, rather than just letting them fall out of your mouth like a fool.You sound like the typical person who would swear on their life Justin Bieber is untalented, but when asked for a reason why just says because he's gay, or because he sounds like a girl.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

People are stupid because of many things. From being addicts to mobile games, to messing up simple grammar, and need a calculator to do simple math people have shown that they are pretty dumb. A person alone, oh ya, they are pretty smart. People, they are dumb as hell. This is why people enjoy dumb crap like tweaking, oh look I can move my ass, DUHHHHH!
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

You've shown your idiocy very well on this debate, so I could say this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.The things you say are 'dumb crap' you give no reason why it is 'dumb'. By the way you use the word 'dumb' a lot. Not in the sense that it was coined for, but in the typical bandwagon follower way where anything you don't like simply must be 'dumb'. Which does not bode well for your argument, in fact it's detrimental to it because everything I read just sounds like the thoughts of the millions who create anti fandoms around they don't like, instead of fandoms around the things they do like. I consider those people stupid (not because I don't like them but because they actually lack some intelligence) because they are wasting their time debating the issues they don't like, when their is a world of issues out there they could enjoy.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

If rust was a sound, then I would compare that to the sound of the Old Metal music. Gritty, rough and not appealing. I feel nauseated when I listen to it. The Nu Metal empowers me.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

I'm not sure what language that is, but I was able to decode enough to get the basis of your argument. I'm not sure what people like you see in that music. All that crap metal crap is always the same. Some guy who sounds like he slit his through yells at the top of his lungs while a garage band mercilessly beat their instrument until it's nothing but dust.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Cool beans.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Wow, just, wow. I'm from Colorado, and I know stoners. But in my entire life I've never heard something so brain dead in my life. Yet again your probable going to top that on your next response.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Obvious troll is obvi.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

As I said, something way stupider. I can't think of one good thing about that crap
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

It's good for fertilizer.   I've grown some pretty good weed with it.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Oh just great, weed. You sounded like a stoned idiot. That shot ruined the image of my wonderful state. At least tabocco can be a sauce, while weed is just a brain cell burner. Get a life dumbass.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Weed is great. You can hear me? Holy shit! The only sound I've been making, is with my farts. Can you smell me too? ...What shot? My fart wasn't that loud... THC can be a sauce...it only burns brain cells if you smoke it...I thought everyone uses a vaporizer now. If I didn't have a life, I'd be dead, you gummy dummy.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

1. Weed makes idiots, no wonder all those other countries make fun of each other.2. I can't smell you ya moron3. Auto correct, I was trying to say shit4. Most people do smoke it, and I bet your one of them you stoner5. Vaporizers, oh what new drug trend are you dumbasses making now6. There's a lot more to having a life than just not being dead. You should have a job, not live on welfare, and also not live with your parents still when you grow up
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

1. Prove it.2. But you could hear me. Your nose is broked?3. My name isn't Auto Correct....4. You'd lose that bet.5. Idk ask the google.6. Why would you want to make it hard on yourself? Life should be easy and relaxing.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

1. I'm from Colorado, proof that stoners are idiots is all around me.2. Saying that proves your dumb3. Now you sound dumber4. I don't see people using it as a paper wieght 5. Idk? If you dont know why did you bring it up. "Ask the Google" it's suprising a person can live without a brain, please tell me how you do it. 6. If you going to sit around a do nothing all day what's the point of living?
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Note2you: Text time, save the insults for mid battle, not the start of it. You made your trolling too obvious. :(Guess I'll continue these shenanigans, cuz I'm bored.1. One miniscule place in the world, does not account for the whole world.2. But you could hear me...so why is it illogical to assume that you could smell me as well?3. You called me "Auto Correct" >.>4. Then you need to get out more.5. I have transcended beyond the use of the physical vessel and have become pure energy.6. Just because they have it easy, doesn't mean they don't do anything.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Trolling isn't the same of having a negative opinion. I thought basically everyone had same point of veiw on this stuff. Nazis are bad, a democracy is a good system, and heavy metal is shit. 1. Oh, so where you live if someone gets shot in the head he doesn't die. Effects of crap like this is the same everywhere.2. I couldn't hear you fart, the only reason I know you did is because you said you farted. 3. I'd call you a smart ass, but your dumb as hell4. Just the other day I was on my bike a getting exercise and saw a bunch of idiots smoking weed5. If you can't notice a simple insult than your really going to need that physical vessel 6. Oh ya, I forgot, you have a full day packed full of collecting welfare from people with a life and pay their taxes. I wonder how you even have time to reply.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

1. Getting high and getting shot are obviously, different activities.2. But you said I sounded like something, and the only sound I had made was farts. You were lying then. :(3. Am I suppose to cry now?4. Good for your. There's still no evidence that weed makes people stupid.5. Good thing I can.6. Eh. It's only once a month. They have plenty of time to do shit.