Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

It wouldn't be back to that way but it would have similarities. Same amount of everything would also not be exactly true (people have different preferences and needs).Actually, we are always in a survival state. If we one day decided to stop doing what we do each day (go to work) it would get ugly really fast. Just being alive means we are surviving.There is a difference between surviving and being in a survival situation, currently we don't need to be in one so you would just be setting everything back.It would not ruin economy and it would not slow down human progress, it would speed up human progress.You eliminate trade, please explain how that would not ruin the economy. You put a massive government in power and force people to work towards their goals, that wouldn't speed up human progress. With no money there would always be optimum activity if people and resources were available. Their work would not be based on money, it would be based on getting it done and once done then moving on. Currently money dictates what gets done and what won't.Money is a medium for trading, trading what? Resources! Thus if there was no money there were likely no resources to begin with, research usually isn't funded for a reason.It could and it would if it were done. Utopian? That's rather stupid. Utopia is subjective and impossible, there would always be some issues. The only difference is there would be less than are currently.Utopia is a perfect world, obviously that is impossible, but your views on how the world should work are very similar to a utopian, there would be the same amount of issues if not more, except instead of it being in the private sector they would be in the state. Your not solving a problem, your just creating new ones and moving the old one.What is the deal with US and money? You like money so much? Without even realizing it's bad, considering there is a better way.Whats with the united states and money? We were (up until recently) know for being very independent, hardworking and inovative people, we like to keep what we earn. And what is so bad amount money, all it does is simplify trade so to be against money is to be against trade. Your way isn't better, you just cant see past the whole "oh no, someone is wealthier than me... greedy bastard! I deserve some of that!" phase.Are you afraid of losing money? So afraid that you won't even try to imagine a world without it with an objective mind?Its not out of fear of loosing money, its out of the common sense that destroying trade and having a large government run everything is a terrible path, again you bring up imagination, I can imagine your little fantasy unlike you though I can also see what it would be like outside of my head and in the real world.Economy does not mean the use of money...No, it is in reference to trade, you eliminating the main medium for trade and proposing we do almost no trading would destroy the economy.Survival... there's nothing more important. If we died then everything we have done so far would be for nothing, all pointless. Our existence is constant survival.We are currently not on the brink of extinction, stop acting like were on the verge of death. Too high prices everywhere, too low wages everywhere, or just for most people.The profit, they literally don't need that much money. It's called greed.Someone making more than they need isn't called greed, its one form of being successful, most people forget to take into account that whoever is selling and employing is also taking a very large risk and its not exactly easy running a business.People would notice if someone would be abusing power. What would they use it for? To make the economy money-based again?Do you not understand? Ok, there is no currency, everything is run by government, can you not see how much room for corruption there is?Isn't human nature something that applies to all humans? Being greedy is not human nature. I'm not greedy. Neither does everyone want power.Its applies to everyone, every human is greedy on some level, whether you like it or not ALL people have a desire for wealth or power. Of course your not greedy, its always the other guy right?Keeping something that could be used for something better than just keeping it is being greedy. No money means there will be no profits, everything will go into circulation or be stored till comes time for use. Profit is unused excess. The only benefits people gain from labor is what gets done by their work. Working just to get more money... seriously, that's messed up.Who are you decide how the money that they made is to be used? Keeping your profits, regardless if someone wants a share of it or not isn't greed. Its wouldn't be about profits, it would be about much power and resources can you get your hands on. And most work is to get more money how is that messed up? You work, then you get a medium for trade so you can get what you want, not just what the state has available.IT. IS. ABOUT. MONEY. It is about personal welfare and wants and desires, money also provides power. But not always. It would change a lot, almost everything.Because once you eliminate money personal goals, wants and desires will go away? You do not understand human nature at all, stop being so niave, get off your college campus and go into the real world, its time you get out of this state of mind that people are wonderful creatures that can be trusted by "the evil money" has corrupted us and that you understand how human nature really works.I know how people work, better than you do. Apparently....No you don't, if you did, you would see how flawed your ideology is.