azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

when proving something exists, you need a corresponding amount of evidence that is proportional to the claim.Saying that the universe was created by an omnipotent being is a very large claim.therefore it would require a very large amount of evidence to prove this claim.The only evidence for the Judeochristian G-d is a book that cannot be verified.There is just as much evidence for G-d as there is for any other literature, including Harry Potter.Yes, many people believe in G-d. To rely on this fact is to succumb to the logical fallacy argumentum ad populum.The evidence against G-d is astounding.fossils, mere snapshots of organisms that can be dated using radioisotope decay, suggests that creatures evolved overtime. Of course, this is evidence-not proof- that G-d did not create all life forms at once. Even if you do not believe this evidence proves evolution, it is a more legitimate source of information than unverifiable literature.And evolution explains many phenomena that the bible simply cannot.For instance, if every man or woman is a descendant of the same two people, how are there so many different varieties of people today?Adam and Eve, collectively, could not have contained the entirety of all possible human genomes between the two of them.For example, there are six known genes for different eye color. Adam and Eve could have between them up to four (one dominant, one recessive each).If animals change over time, then evolution would be inevitable: as two different changes aid two different subsets of a species, given enough time they would accumulate enough of these changes to be considered different species in their own right, much like the Galapagos finches that led Darwin to theorize evolution.However, if animals do not change over time, then there would be no more genetic diversity than could be possible from two normal human beings, in which case there would not be a wide variety of phenotypes today
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

There is more evidence that God exists than there is evidence that He doesn't.What, to you, is satisfactory evidence that something doesn't exist?
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

that doesn't even make since plus God is part of every religon exept Muslumic religon ,I think, even if it's not true God is still apart of most religons and the most belived one Christianity
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

There is nothing in your source that surprises or interests me. What did you intend to prove with it? That Christianity is popular? Popularity does not equal validity. Your statement that God (whether you mean the Christian God, or a god in general) is a component of every religion except 'Muslumic' is astoundingly ignorant on more than one level.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

What are you talking about, Allah is the same as Yahweh, just prophesied through a different man. The Qu'ran has the same opening stories as the Torah and the Bible. All of these are schisms of the same doctrine. To state that God is not present there but present in your religion is the reason why there is so much conflict. By the way Islam is increasing every year While Christianity is shrinking.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

There 3 opinions on the question of God: Yes , No , and NULL. NULL is me and every time Yes or No bugs me with Yes or No question I always think "Why me?".
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

is god true?Then why do people suffer in Africa? Why do innocent people get killed, while the evil ones still run around? Why is there still racism?I rest my case.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

First of all, if you don't believe in God, why is your name christjesus?The answer to your question is simple. What would be the point of our existence of we were merely God's puppets? God gave us free will, and expects us to use it well. He wants us to freely follow Him, for there is no point in making drones who follow Him. That would defeat the purpose of followers.But, as God gave us the free will to obey Him, we must also have the free will to disobey Him, otherwise it would not be actual free will.However, he gave us guidelines, rules ingrained into our very consciousness. All humanity has a sense of right and wrong. You may argue that this is merely a human standard that we learn from our parents. How, then, do you explain the existence of this standard throughout all history in every nation and culture, even in cultures that had never met?Any way you argue, you are comparing reality to a standard. that standard is this sense of right and wrong.So why are there still bad people? No one is intentionally evil. Evil is something that cannot exist without good. Evil is the desire of something good, which we attempt to achieve by the wrong means. If you have ever seen or read Death Note, then you will understand the perfect example of this. The main character wishes to build a world without evil, and does so by killing criminals. Then he kills all who oppose him, as they are opposing the world without evil. Then he kills people who fully support him, merely because they are no longer useful, or he finds them annoying. You can tell what he is doing is evil, but he believes fully that what he is doing is good, even as he kills innocents.Satan is not just some evil dude who does bad stuff. Satan is the fallen angel. He was once good, but is now evil. He tempts us to do evil. To use C. S. Lewis's analogy, this world is like a territory that has been taken over by the enemy. Satan tries to convince us not to go to church, because that is when we listen to our allies who instruct us how to defeat the enemy. This world is at war.Death is not something to be feared. Death is the entrance into eternal paradise, for those who have done good, or the entrance into eternal damnation for those who have done evil. Is you are an atheist, then what do you have to fear? If you truly believe that there is nothing after death, then there would be no punishment for trying to understand and coming to believe in God. For, if God is real, which I sincerely believe that he is, then you would end up in paradise. If he is not, then there would be no negative to believing. But if He is and you do not believe, there is the possibility that you could be punished. although there are many non-believers who probably went to heaven, because they are good people nonetheless.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

First of all, if you don't believe in God, why is your name christjesus?The answer to your question is simple. What would be the point of our existence of we were merely God's puppets? God gave us free will, and expects us to use it well. He wants us to freely follow Him, for there is no point in making drones who follow Him. That would defeat the purpose of followers.But, as God gave us the free will to obey Him, we must also have the free will to disobey Him, otherwise it would not be actual free will.However, he gave us guidelines, rules ingrained into our very consciousness. All humanity has a sense of right and wrong. You may argue that this is merely a human standard that we learn from our parents. How, then, do you explain the existence of this standard throughout all history in every nation and culture, even in cultures that had never met?Any way you argue, you are comparing reality to a standard. that standard is this sense of right and wrong.So why are there still bad people? No one is intentionally evil. Evil is something that cannot exist without good. Evil is the desire of something good, which we attempt to achieve by the wrong means. If you have ever seen or read Death Note, then you will understand the perfect example of this. The main character wishes to build a world without evil, and does so by killing criminals. Then he kills all who oppose him, as they are opposing the world without evil. Then he kills people who fully support him, merely because they are no longer useful, or he finds them annoying. You can tell what he is doing is evil, but he believes fully that what he is doing is good, even as he kills innocents.Satan is not just some evil dude who does bad stuff. Satan is the fallen angel. He was once good, but is now evil. He tempts us to do evil. To use C. S. Lewis's analogy, this world is like a territory that has been taken over by the enemy. Satan tries to convince us not to go to church, because that is when we listen to our allies who instruct us how to defeat the enemy. This world is at war.Death is not something to be feared. Death is the entrance into eternal paradise, for those who have done good, or the entrance into eternal damnation for those who have done evil. Is you are an atheist, then what do you have to fear? If you truly believe that there is nothing after death, then there would be no punishment for trying to understand and coming to believe in God. For, if God is real, which I sincerely believe that he is, then you would end up in paradise. If he is not, then there would be no negative to believing. But if He is and you do not believe, there is the possibility that you could be punished. although there are many non-believers who probably went to heaven, because they are good people nonetheless.You wrote a pargagraph? Wow, you have no life..
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

you troll on a debating website? wow, then you definitely have no life.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

W.T.H is a pargagraph? Seriously, from a fellow troll... at least have a basic grasp of the English language.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

I did not write a paragraph. I wrote multiple, as you may have noticed by the spacing.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

"You wrote a pargagraph? Wow, you have no life.."Just pack it in and move on. If you consider that a paragraph I would hate to see what boks you redd. Correction: boks to books, and redd to read
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

manen why do people suffer in Africa? Why do innocent people get killed, while the evil ones still run around? Why is there still racism?I rest my case."In the Bible we define the non-believers as evil ones. Also suffering is brought on through sin. Genesis 2:17 "but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." Romans 5:12 "Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned." Romans 5:14 "Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam...." Because of our acts of disobedience to God, all of us face sin and death. God gives us freewill to pursue our own virtues or malices. There is an eternal way to be saved through Jesus our savior. Romans 5:16 "And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. Forthee judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses broughtjustificationn."
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

you rest your case?You dont think any of this has anything to do with us!so your going to blame God for our mistakes?
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

True is differnet than real. I would say in the minds of those who believe in god, he is true. That is not the spirit of the argument I sense though. In the spirit of this argument, I'm afraid to inform you this being does not exist.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

"In the spirit of this argument, I'm afraid to inform you this being does not exist." This is proven by your superior understanding of unprovable phenomena outside of scientific law? I am afraid (not really) to inform you, that you have certified yourself insane.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

That makes no sense. If you believe a lie with all your heart, that makes it no closer to truth. It is still a lie.And God does exist.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

If you believe a lie with all your heart, that makes it no closer to truth. It is still a lie>< says the kettle to the coffee.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

¿...........................................................................................?
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

">< says the kettle to the coffee." Ha!, you can't even get that concept right.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

You and zer are both idiots.You're claiming you know something which is unknowable. I'm claiming I don't believe in what you do not know. You call me crazy for not believing your silly fairytale.It's a crazy person calling someone else crazy. The kettle calling the coffee black. In this case I'm the coffee except not crazy.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

"You're claiming you know something which is unknowable." How is this not knowable? We have the word of God, and countless eyewitness testimonies in the Bible. You may not believe what they say, but eyewitness testimony carries a lot of weight in a court of law. "I'm claiming I don't believe in what you do not know. You call me crazy for not believing your silly fairytale." You contradict yourself now. You say we are crazy for believing in what we do not know. Then you call it a "silly fairytale" implying you have methods to prove or disprove it. You ask how we can prove it, yet you have no testable method to disprove it. Thank you for proving you're just as dumb as you look.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

How is this not knowable? We have the word of God, and countless eyewitness testimonies in the Bible. You may not believe what they say, but eyewitness testimony carries a lot of weight in a court of law.No, you don't have any eyewitness testimony. You have a book, that not a word of which was written until about a hundred years after any potential eyewitness would have passed away.That's like saying Superman exists because I read Lois Lane's eyewitness testimony.You contradict yourself now. You say we are crazy for believing in what we do not know. Then you call it a "silly fairytale" implying you have methods to prove or disprove it. You ask how we can prove it, yet you have no testable method to disprove it. Thank you for proving you're just as dumb as you look.This is why Christians today can only recruit from prisons and rehab centers, otherwise one needs to be indoctrinated to buy into the silliness.Claiming something with no evidence puts the burden of proof on the one making the claim. "Fairytale" is fitting because I can say "Peter Pan exists" then simply claim that since you cannot prove he does not, I am right and you are wrong.Yet you fail to see how fitting the analogy is, because you are heavily absorbed in your belief system. How do you expect to talk to anyone who does not believe as you do, if you are incapable of even understanding why believing something based on a fantastical book written over a thousand years ago, seems quite silly?
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

"No, you don't have any eyewitness testimony. You have a book, that not a word of which was written until about a hundred years after any potential eyewitness would have passed away." You are truly ignorant. First of all, the first five books of the Bible were written by Moses. The four gospels of the new testament were written within a generation of the Apostles. Paul's books were written by him as letters to various churches. How is this hundreds of years later? Maybe you are referring to the KJV version, which is a translation of the original text. "This is why Christians today can only recruit from prisons and rehab centers, otherwise one needs to be indoctrinated to buy into the silliness." This is some real conjecture here. Most people who convert are those who have humbled themselves and repent for their sins. Perhaps when you lose your arrogance you too will understand this ideology. "Yet you fail to see how fitting the analogy is, because you are heavily absorbed in your belief system. How do you expect to talk to anyone who does not believe as you do, if you are incapable of even understanding why believing something based on a fantastical book written over a thousand years ago, seems quite silly?" You think we are just following a "book" just to have a religion. That is it just something we do. This "book" was written by the people who lived through the events that happened. You percieved those stories to be fantasy, yet you doubt them on your own conjecture. You weren't there to witness the events. For you to dismiss it, then you better have some compelling evidence to disprove it. You can't say science doesn't support it, because miracles are the violations in natural laws. So of course science doesn't support it, because this is what makes them significant events.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

1. Use shift 8, the star icon to make italics and two of them at the beginning and end of each quote to make it bold. It makes it easier to read, and I can only argue with theists extraordinarily drunk, otherwise your backwards logic and die-hard loyalty to ignoring every point I make gives me ulcers.2. The first books were not written by moses. Give me a link to photographic evidence that they were written in this time frame and contain his signiture. You cannot. He likely did not exist and if he did the stories of him are greatly exaggerated.3. My "conjecture" is based on statistics; that Christians make up over 80% of the US population, have more children per capita, do a stellar job of indoctrinating and flooding the web with bogus sources, and yet are dwindling in numbers can only mean that many Christians are seeing the light and the joke of a hoax your religion has been and is currently playing on the world, that the vast vast majority of Christians were born such and never gave it two thoughts, and that those you do convert only convert due to their own circumstance - and if it were not for Christianity's existance they would find another cult to follow is what I base my conjecture on... granted the last conjecture is based on a Minor in Human Behavior and not on statistics.However, I fail to see what your conjecture is based on. Least mine is based.4. Here's a game I like to play. Not that it has ever done any good with theologians. It is though the most convincing argument to those with no affiliation and debaters fall into it so rarely that I'm compelled to use it whenever possible.Copied and pasted: ""You think we are just following a "Narnia" just to have a religion. That is it just something we do. This "Narnia" was written by the people who lived through the events that happened. You percieved those stories to be fantasy, yet you doubt them on your own conjecture. You weren't there to witness the events. For you to dismiss it, then you better have some compelling evidence to disprove it. You can't say science doesn't support it, because miracles are the violations in natural laws. So of course science doesn't support it, because this is what makes them significant events.""In this case I only had to replace 2 words, usually it is three or four. Hopefully you see how ridiculous this last point of yours is.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

What the hell happened to my replies?Anyway. You have no proof of god. I don't believe he exists. One would think an all encompassing being would leave some trace of his own existence somewhere.For example, a black hole. Never seen it, no human in a hundred lifetimes from now will be able to see one first hand, yet we know they exist in space. So then, something so much bigger and more powerful should have some residual evidence of existence - logical, mathmatical, or some other form. There should be something.Hence, while I cannot prove a negative and you certainly cannot provide your own proof of this mythical being's existance, I still feel I have the stronger arguement.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Okay, maybe my showing of this video is a bit excessive, but it covers a lot.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Give me the link.I've gone through this video point by point before but I don't have 59.45 minutes. I'll look up the text and explain all the places your christian brothers lied to you in this video.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

if god was there people would be living for thousands and millions of years and innocent people would never be the prey of death.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Sin is what caused death. Suffering, disease, and violent crimes are attributed to the sin of man. By the way no one is innocent, for we are born into sin. The acts of man is what caused our fall.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Too find someone like you besides me genesis is a rarity on this website. lol
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Yes this is what really seperates us from God and our points in this debate. We beleive according too the word of God that man is a sinner and we need too repent, and be forgiven through Jesus christ who died on the cross for each and everyone of us. His blood was spilt for us his terrible beatings represent our sin covering up his body so it can be laid out on him. The beleive that he done this for our sake and that he is the son of God will free us from our sin. The other side is what defines good and what defines evil. It comes too this. Read the word of God and you will truely know what is good. You will know what true love is and you will find it. Also we are made in Gods image so for a fact undoubtably there is a part of every human being that longs too beleive in order for the sole to be given life and healing through Jesus christ. I beleive this too be so. Because I was saved because I was drawn in by his love. I knew that my imperfection is what is leading me too sin. MY guilt was eating me apart. But that day was no more, and still is no more because I am a healed.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

God....who created him/her...........If to be human is 2 error..then GOD is fallabile..Gods were created to control human civialization/coupling... the need to explain or divine the meaing of life.......your god .....got it wrong
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Well you see, I once saw my grandma pray to God when she wasn't feeling well...Just then did I understand that god does not exis and he is not a real person but sometime we just wan't him to exist because he gives us faith. So bottom line, he is just alive in everyone's mind and not a human being.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

I do not believe god is "true"... I believe he is make belief..I also don't believe anyone can inpregnate someone with out sexual intercourse.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

God is not true, but just a delusion. Proof:Definition of a god, he is morally perfect, he is almighty, he is all powerful.I would assume a morally perfect being is able to decide if murder/rape of a innocent being is wrong or right. And since god is morally perfect he/she is aware of the fact that these immoral acts are being committed. Now this morally perfect being has done nothing to stop these immoral acts from being committed which he supposedly deemed wrong himself in many holy books. And there is no reason he can't, since he is all powerful.But murder, rape, abuse, etc. still take place without any intervention form a superior being.Therefore God is not true.