Debate: Socialism vs Capitalism
Side: Socialism

"Ha, okay you got this all wrong, if this was a capitalist team they would be giving all players opportunity to work there way up to the top. Thats like saying the government doesn't let poor people work! and that is not true."I'm not saying they don't give every one the 'opportunity' to work. But there is a clear and inherent disadvantage to poorer families in a capitalist society. If you try to argue that point then you are even dumber than your arguments would make you appear. "So those parents are the bad guys? Who says that those player's parents didn't come from nothing and get rich through hard work? That would make them good examples." No no no, i am not saying that the parents are the bad guys... i am simply saying that those people born into wealthy families have an extreme advantage in a capitalist system, in regards to your football team analogy the richer parents could afford to buy their children the best equipment, new equipment on a regular basis, lots of professional training, and in some cases even buying their children spots on certain high profile teams or w/e. In the real world this can equate to the parents buying their children positions in expensive private schools to gain a great education, to buying them all the best in learning materials (such as computers etc.), and even buying them (or using their influence) jobs in high profile companies etc.Whereas a poorer family can only afford (again, conforming to your football analogy) use equipment (which will never be replaced) and low qualiy (if any) practice or training. In the real world this equates to public schooling (generally low quality), a generally unstable home in a generally poor neighborhood, and used or outdated equipment.As you can see, a capitalist society clearly helps richer families much more than poorer families. Therefor your statement: "f this was a capitalist team they would be giving all players opportunity to work there way up to the top. Thats like saying the government doesn't let poor people work! and that is not true." is not true, yes they 'can' work, but they are at an extreme disadvantage.Any yes, i know what capitalism is."A distinguishing feature of capitalism is that each person owns his or her own labor and therefore is allowed to sell the use of it to employers."--this is the exact downfall of capitalism... those with wealth have the ability to gain valuable training to sell for more wealth. those without wealth do not have this ability."Who says that those player's parents didn't come from nothing and get rich through hard work?"--- fair point, but if we compare the children, one who grows up in a rich environment, and one who grows up in a poor environment, both of whom put in the same amount of work in 'growing up' yet one has an extreme advantage. Is that fair? Not at all. Not at all.Again, you fail to realize what socialism is, its based on meritocracy, so those who do work more get more compensation. However, there is an effort to equalize the classes so the difference in wage between a brain doctor for example or a janitor would be smaller than in a capitalist society. Obviously a society where everyone gets the same exact wage for any level of work is a bad idea. Good thing thats NOT socialism.