azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

I say yes it should be illegalBut according to those who are for homosexuality the answer should be no.Why?Underage sex doesn't hurt anybody.If two people want to do it they should.Its their own bodies.What they do only affects them.As long as they practice safe sex..
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

Kinda, you must be a homo. I don't really know or care. What I do know is that sex between minors, protected or unprotected should be illegal. ~! V
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

Calling people names does NOTHING to further your "argument", period. Stop it.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Ok mister guy I can agree with you on that. I'll work on my diplomacy. See, we can agree on somethings.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Thats it. Im tired of you fascist totalitarians poisoning my debates.Im just gonna ban you for your fascist ageist views.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

So if a 14 year old buy & girl have sex you think the police should arrest them? what kind of sick bastard are you?
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

The kind who knows that kidds that are 14 years old should not be having sex. A girl having a guy's dick shoved into her vagina is some kind of stress to her body that NO 14, 15, 16, or even 17 year old should experience. And you know he isn't going to be gentle. He doesn't know the difference from her screaming 'yes, yes, more more' and her going 'no no stop'. Cuz they are KIDDS!!! They don't have the self control. That is why you are not allowed to leave your parents until you are 18. ~! V
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Give girls more credit. And, for that matter, give guys more credit. Yes, a lot of teens have meaningless, bad sex- and so do adults. Many teens can have consensual (your description sounds like rape), safe, pleasurable sex- and, just so you know, for most of human history, teens were considered adults and procreated like adults.Not all teenage guys are violent sexual fiends, just like not all teenage girls are innocent flowers waiting to be corrupted. This ideology enforces Victorian ideas about sexuality that are unrealistic and oppressive- for both males and females.I'm sorry if you had a bad experience, and I'm not trying to be insensitive to whatever makes you have a reaction so strongly and with such terrible grammar. However, I think it's important to say that most teenage sex isn't violent or forced- yes, it does happen, and when it does it's unfortunate, but there's more to sex than "shoving a dick into her vagina"- most teenagers could tell you that.Saying that young men don't have self control only excuses inexcusable behavior, while treating young women like docile lambs only sets them up to be victimized. All parties need to be held responsible for their roles in sexual practices, and young people need education- young people (male AND female) need to be empowered to say "no" and back it up- and understand that "no means no". Saying that teens are somehow underdeveloped or out of control of their behaviors doesn't help anyone.Besides, what's so magical about eighteen? At seventeen and 364 days, a young women shouldn't be subjected to the horror that is sexual activity, but at eighteen she's totally ready for everything? Your argument makes me unhappy.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

I don't know wheather you're disscusing rape or sexual activity. Obviously you've never been laid or you had a very bad experience. And you also have some indipendence issues because you're convinced that minors can't live on their own until they're 18 but they do it all the time so I suggest you join the real world honey. =]
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

We are discussing sexual activity between 2 minors the same age.Example: A 14 year old boy & a 14 year old girl are dating & really love each other. They go home & do stuff like making out, taking their clothes off, having sex, & sleeping naked together. Should the government interfere with that?Should the police arrest them & have them charged with having sex while under the age of consent?
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

So, we know where you stand on this whole thing. If it was your son shoving his dick into some girls vagina or your daughter vagina getting a dick shoved into it, you would be totally cool with it... when he or she was 14. What about if they were 16? You tell me~! V
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

You have to think about why this law would be created in the first place. Anything to try and cut down on the number of teen pregnancies and STDs I'm all for. There are good intentions behind this law even if it is hard to enforce. Teens make very stupid and immature choices all the time. Billions of dollars are spent every year on costs related to teen pregnancy. The only way i can see this really being enforced is if the parents were to press charges. Still I'm sure many minors would think twice about having sex if they knew jail was a possibility. I know if it was my daughter and the guy was trying to skip out I'd press charges in a heartbeat. No matter how much you guys argue against this law it's still in place in many places, so deal with it fuckers!
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

the reason it is illegal is that it spreads disease it causes turmoil and it is inappropriate adn the government should be able to decide
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

"arrest those F*ers"? Really?! They should put a tighter leash on the use of inappropriate words on this site. Anyway, yes it should be illegal. In fact fortification of all kinds should be illegal.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

I'm not sure arresting would be appropriate, it isn't going to help anyone, however by the same token, you are obviously immature and have no grasp on the consequences of your actions. This is why ages were set for consent. If your minor girl friend gets pregnant, are you willing to marry her, and without a high school education supporting her and the baby is going to be tough. Your job qualifications are manual labor, the cost of having a baby easily exceeds $5000 these days. Most areas of the country rent exceeds $600/month, not to mention utilities, etc., etc. Many grown up and responsible adults are struggling to meet their needs, even some of those with an education. If you are willing to marry her, then get approval from both parents, yours and hers and marry the girl, then you are not doing anything illegal. Let's ask you a question, if you were to get married and the girl you were marrying refused to have sex until marriage, would you trust her more or less than a girl who wanted to hit the sack with you on the first date? If the answer you give is the same as or less, then you obviously have some growing up to do. Your actions have consequences that you have obviously not thought through. If you do indeed have sex out of marriage, especially as a minor still in school, (assuming you have not dropped out), then your immaturity is obvious and is exactly why you should not be having sex, and you are the reason why an age of consent is in place, and some people are not mature even at the age of 18, 25, even 35, but most at these ages have graduated and will live with the consequences of their actions, but at least they can get a job and try to support their decisions.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

If the age of consent law says that a person under the age of 18 doesn't have the maturity or emotional security to have sexually intercourse then yes it should be illegal. The parents should have the right to press charges on the fact. There shouldn't be any gray area with the law, it's a yes or a no.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Wrong. The government does not have the right to dictate what people do with their bodies.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

Yes they do when what people do to their body cost me money!
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Wrong. People have the right to choose what to do with their bodies.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest those fuckers!

Yeah, when they are considered adults not when they are children.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

You do not have the right to tell people what to do with their bodies. .
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

There is a legal age limit for a reason. People often regret decisions they made rather hastily as a teenager. Also, teen pregnancy is currently a huge issue. If you make it OK to have sex underage this problem will only get worse. Teen pregnancy is also proof that many underage are not ready to make a responsible choice.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

No one is saying that is not something that needs to talked about and make clear how serious it is, but arresting people will not serve anyone.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

Do you even know what illegal means? illegal doesn't mean don't support it. Illegal means if you do it then the police will arrest you & take you to jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!If a 14 year old boy & a 14 year old girl have sex then you want the cops to break in & arrest them?What kind of sick bastard are you.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

lol just because it's illegal doesn't mean they're going to be arrested. It's one of those laws which are there to deter, but nobody gives a shit about. Like speed limits.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

Yes it does. How many laws are there that if you break them you won't get in trouble?Why do you support sexual fascism?
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest them!

Any law you break you could get in trouble. That does not mean it will be prison. How many times do you think you need to repeat the same flawed argument before you realize nobody is buying it.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

"just because it's illegal doesn't mean they're going to be arrested. It's one of those laws which are there to deter, but nobody gives a shit about."You've just contradicted yourself over the course of two sentences! If the already (supposed) laws that are (aren't) on the books aren't being effective, then what's the point??
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

Ok so far I've been ignoring your useless comments but you nearly made a point.Except you haven't...Or maybe I didn't make myself clear.It's one of those laws nobody gives a shit about upholding.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

HAHAHA. You think every law is enforced by jail time? There are other ways of enforcing a law. Public service etc
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

Once again, do you REALLY want the govt. inside people's bedrooms??
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No they should be allowed

Of course most laws are enforced by prison. Or they're enforced by stealing shit loads of money aka writing tickets.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes they are too young

Or, they are enforced by community service, parole, suspended licenses etc. There are many ways to enforce a law that needs to be there.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Why do you want them to get punished?They never did anything to you. They aren't hurting anybody.JUST LEAVE THEM ALONE YOU FUCKEN TOTALITARIAN!
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest them!

Actually, when they get pregnant and use the governments resources, they are hurting me. They are also hurting themselves by engaging in an activity they do not have the maturity to be engaging in.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Well if a poor middle aged woman gets pregnant isn't that just as bad?Also they aren't hurting themselves. They are making each otehr feel good.If anybody should go to prison it's you totalitarians!
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: Yes arrest them!

If a middle aged woman gets pregnant, she is old enough to deal with the consequences. Also, she would not have to drop out of school to raise this child. Which affects our national education rate. Also, you think that the only effect of sex is physical? There are many mental effects to sex as well. Both positive and negative. Especially, when the said party is not old enough, or mature enough to understand the consequences already mentioned.
Debate: Should sex between minors the same age be illegal?
Side: No leave them alone

Thats it. Im tired of you fascist totalitarians poisoning my debates.Im just gonna ban you for your fascist ageist views.Im giving you fascists a taste of your own medicine.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I say yes we should Because He is a grate writer and we can learn a lot more about writing and literature from the work that his done so I think we should keep learning Shakespeare’s work at a high school level.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

We should continue studying about Shakespeare's work because it shows the most amazing plays made by himself and also shows about how complex love and poetry really is back then. Also if you're an actor or trying to be one. Shakespeare is great to study of how they act and show tragedy, love, disaster, and etc...
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I think Shakespeare should continue being taught in high school. Shakespeare's work is defined and takes actual thinking to comprehend. Many high school students want to go through high school doing the minimal amount of work possible. That's why many students don't want to continue it. Shakespeare's pieces that are studied in high school are a preview and a jump start to what is studied in college. Therefore, Shakespeare should continue to be taught in high school.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Great point on how Shakespeare's writing or "work is defined and takes actual thinking to comprehend."
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Shakespeare’s work should still be studied in high school. Not only is he as a person a part of our history, but his works is as well. Many theatrical play writes, directors, and even theatrical teachers use his works as reference and inspiration. Learning it in high school helps to expand our horizons and think deeper about little things. Seeing how Shakespeare used everyday life, and emotions to create stories and plays that are significantly similar to what others go through each day can help us to better express ourselves. It shows us that there are other ways to view the world, and there are more creative ways to show how we view our thoughts and emotions. Just like History, Math, and Science, are taught to enhance our intelligence, studying Shakespeare’s work can do the same as well.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I believe that Shakespeare's works should be studied at the high school level, but on the Honors and AP level. Shakespeare's works are very admirable and everyone should be exposed to them; however, I feel that some students at the high school levels do not respect and take his works very seriously. Shakespeare's works are profound and some people can't understand it.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Having shakespeare's work in high schools could have a substantial affect in student's studies and knowledge. Most high school students believe in just doing the least minimum amount of work, and having to study shakespeare's writting's destroys most high school students mind set. I believe that shakespeare's work should continue to be studied at the high school level simply because this subject can further our education and could prepare us for post high school education.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Shakespeare should continue to be taught at a high school level because he has made monumental literature steps that has altered the way plays, sonnets, poems, and even stories were written. Without Shakespeare there would be far less great works for kids to study in high school, therefore we should study him.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I think that Shakespeare should be studied in high school because even though people don't speak the way they did back in his day, its good literature and makes people think about what he was trying to say and portray in his plays. People seem to not want to read it simply because they find it boring, but if you actually took the time to try and understand what it meant and was saying, you may see why so many people back then enjoyed his plays/literature.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Shakespeare should continue to be taught in high schools.His works are probably the most difficult and most challenging portions in all of literature. There are countless courses in school which may or may not benefit in the outside, however Shakespeare illustrates the most benevolent and nefarious aspects of human nature in such ways that are unique in literature.Examples: Macbeth's relentless quest for power, Romeo and Juliet's teenage lust, Caesar and Cleopatra's undying passions, Othello's unfounded jealousy driving him to murder, the consequences of greed and envy which lead to murder such as in Julius Caesar.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Personally I love Romeo + Juliet and his life story in general, there for i am for it. However, regardless of you liking him or not his genius and the level of english his stories teach is undeniable.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I think that Shakespeare’s work should be continued to be studied in high schools because it can help us become skilled at the writing, and literature that was used in the past, and help us comprehend Shakespeare's work. I also think it should be studied because it prepares you for college and the type of stories that are required to be read in English courses.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I feel that Shakespeare should continue being taught in the high school level. It offers an out reach of education. However i feel that Shakespeare should be taught in a more modern fashion.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I believe that Shakespeare's work should continue to be studied at the high school level because, it is very knowledgeable, and also teenagers can learn a thing or to from Shakespeare about love and real poetry and plays. Also, his work has meaning that is still similar to the years now, alot has changed and it is good to compare the changes from the years with Shakespeare and now.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I do believe that the high school systems should continue to flourish the works of Shakespeare. Although he was not modern or up to speed with our times, he was and is a historical figure that shows the progression of how far the art of playwright and poetry has come. It is the best of our histories past that connects us to the sufficiency of our future.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Teaching Shakespeare in high school does not harm anyone in any way. It only makes you that much wiser, and exercises your brain.. Kids who don't enjoy learning it are just lazy. It will only broaden your understanding of how your language began and has evolved and maybe even give you some appreciation for they way things are now even if the way things are now is improper. You wouldn't want to stop teaching about world history would you? I mean why not it's the past. It's the same here learning this just gives you more appreciation and knowledge and the saying goes history repeats itself, maybe we will be speaking Shakespearian again one day.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

William Shakespeare invented a lot of the words in the English language, many of them are still in use today. This is one reason to study Shakespeare's works.Another reason to learn Shakespeare is that Shakespeare is that Shakespeare was an expert in using words to make ordinary people understand things and feel emotion. He was a great writer who wrote plays not for highly educated people, but for everyone to enjoy. In these plays, he talked about controversial topics, tragedy, horror, fantasy, love, and famous people. We can learn from Shakespeare if we want to be able to influence other people as well as he did.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I think it should be taught, not from the facts that I know about Shakespeare, but what I hear about his works. His writings, are above "my" reading levels, therefor giving me somewhat of a challenge. I'm more neutral in this debate, but variations of new and old works should be studied.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

I strongly agree that Shakespeare’s works should continue to be studied at the highs school level. Shakespeare’s impact in the English department is like Michael Jordan’s on basketball or Tiger Woods on golf. Shakespeare’s work is pure genius and every high school student should have the chance of studying it. Studying his work really defines breaking down complex readings, and really trying to understand it. Studying his work could really benefit every student’s outlook on English.
Debate: Should Shakespeare's works continue to be studied at the high school level?
Side: yes

Shakespeare has taught me many things. The most valuable thing to me was not to let your anger of something long ago ruin relationships now. Besides that, it gives us some variety, and lets us slip into roles and characters outside of our daily lives. He's plays a key role in literature and eliminating him from our curriculum would mean amongst other classroom teachings he is of little importance.