azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Babies should be able to travel by plane when they are old enough but the airlines should designate an area for the families with infants and children.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Almost everything on the other side is a joke. I love this site. :p
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: Yes

they already are allowed on airplanes. at least where i live.....
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: Yes

Yes we are so should babies there no different tovis they are human. Theyre only smaller
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Since babies do not have the psychological capability to fool TSA and carry a bomb onto an airplane in an act of terrorism, then yes, they should be allowed on airplanes with adult supervision.But, knowing rednecks, there will likely be babies accused of airplane terrorism one day...
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

They should have to make their own way there, laziness that's all it is.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

This may be an exception if the baby has to go to another country and do certain operations... (go to the operation theater) This is an emergency case...
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

Bad idea to lift baby into the air.Keep babies close to land. We are ground animals.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

then, why do we travel in air???????????????
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNLNDTCWC0Q&NR=1
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

They are still too young to travel in planes... and travel aroung the world... Why waste the money...???
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

no not all ,they don't know anyhting about aeroplene and this is a very ............... question.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

aeroplane? Are you for real? '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

The pressure is too high for newborns... Their eyes will bulge out and their eardrums may burst. Poor kid...
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

There is ZERO evidence that what you say above it actually true, period.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

It makes sense. Buses are usually only at full capacity during rush hour. If you make the senior citizens bus pass for off peak hours the only cost is the production of the bus passes - the bus companies lose nothing. What is the argument against?
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

I agree. There is a bus system for Manatee County (It's in Florida) And people over 70 get free bus rides with an I.D. The bus fee is only about roughly $2.00 maybe $2.50. And they're only losing so much. Children under 3 can ride for free and veterans and children get a discount. So do the disabled. Children's fee is $1.00-$1.50 And if I'm correct it's the same for veterans and disabled people. It's pretty fair in my opinion.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

With the culture in America and an increasing elderly population, supporting the elderly is a difficult task. In America it is not in our culture to care for our parent, grandparents etc, when they reach old age. That is why we have an incredible amount of nursing homes, senior living centers etc. That being said, who's responsibility is it?The majority of senior citizens are not collecting a retirement, and many that are collecting retirement are not making enough to support a living wage. Is it really that big of a deal if they get a free pass on public transportation? What about those that do not have family support, which is rather common?For those who are not collecting retirement, they are collecting social security alone. What are they supposed to do with $744/month? Many may still be paying a mortgage and have other bills like the rest of us.It is our duty to help our elders and not throw them away and treat them like peasants.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

Yes, of course, the elderly aren't working anymore and it's hard for them to earn money. Free bus rides should be a thing in the US for the elderly.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

I personally support the idea . Most of the elderly has lost their source of income , and solely dependant on their pensions or personal savings . A meagre amount of bus fares , means alot to them . Free bus rides , may appear to be another means of gratefulness of the societies towards them , for their thus long contributions .
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

its fair because you might see an elderly walking and then the next thing you know they fall and they get hurt :(
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

it is just stupid elderly need bus rides because most of them cant drive
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

and some have cancer and other thing like that that is just unfair to the elderly if they cant find help to the store or bank
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

Should the elderly receive free bus rides? Hello O:Yes, and lunch too. excon
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

elderly are weak and need alot of help...............................................................................................
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

......................................................................it is just right
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

......jfij3eioefnionrvowf.it s just right dot com jjdjdjdeidjeijiediejijdidjeidjvnjinvizanezanderzanderzanderzanderzanderzanderzanderzanderzander
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

I don't think the elderly should have free bus rides but a nice alternative would be for a discount.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

I don't believe in automatically giving anything to a whole public group just because someone falls within the parameters of it. There are elderly who could buy and sell the actual bus they're riding so why should they get the same free ride as someone who is poor? And once something is viewed as an entitlement you can't change or cut it back and the users often start taking it for granted and abusing it.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

There are elderly who could buy and sell the actual bus they're riding so why should they get the same free ride as someone who is poor?There are elderly bus insurers and bus deposit managers who could charge and loan the actual bus they're riding so why should they get the same free ride as someone who is poor?
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

Would it really be fair to anybody if anybody elderly gets a free ride? No not at all they are no differant than any of us we are all people that can make money, get jobs and be able to pay for a ticket for a bus ride.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

Its like saying they need more attention because they are elderly but we need everything for everybody to be fair.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

You are mistaking "purely equal" with "fair".
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

Actually they aren't. The elderly are less able to work, rely upon retirement savings, and tend to have higher medical costs.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

No, the families of elderly should pay for their bus rides if the elderly has no money. Its truly sick what the Democrat party has done to take the responsibility of family, to take care of it's own, to yet one more wasteful Government program handing out free stuff on the backs of the middle class.We are going bankrupt with a corrupt bunch of Politicians redistributing our hard earned money all for purposes of getting their vote. REPREHENSIBLE!Now please do what every Left wing person does by spewing the laughable excuse of how not all old people have families to help. The laws never make that distinction! They will create many more Government jobs paid for by the tax payers to hand out freebies to all. WAKE UP!
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

do tell where in this debate mentions anything to do with democrats?
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

What planet do you live on? Everyone with any type of intellect knows that Democrats constantly pander to people for their vote by redistributing money from middle class tax payers.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

"Everyone with any type of intellect agrees with me" There you go again. All political parties pander. Republicans do the same thing with military spending (local jobs) in many states. That is redistributing money from the middle class as well.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

You will make anything pathetically partisan, won't you?Just anything at all. EVERYTHING is "us vs them".
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: No! They can afford it!

You know, I agree entirely. I think that if they really do not have the money, then their family should help out. Or, hey, anyone for that matter. If someone needs help, I, for one, am going to step up and help them. Though, I wouldn't be against a discount for the elderly.
Debate: Should the elderly receive free bus rides?
Side: Yes! It's fair that way!

Riiiiiggghhhht.. And if they don't have family then fuck them? God I'm glad people like you will never ever get into power.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

Airplanes can carry hundreds of passengers around the world within a day, enhances globalization.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

The gym's functional cable machines are excellent for a full-body workout. They provide a wide range of exercises and help improve strength, stability, and overall muscular balance. https://bradgym.com/best-ab-roller/
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

Airplanes are safer.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

airplanes accidents are frequent too. .
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

Not true... in the US, 40,000 die from car accidents each year, less than 1000 die from plane crashes.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

that is the people's fault driving so rash . but most airplane accidents are because of technical faults..
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

I would definitely be piloted around in an Airplane if I could afford something like that xD.I would parachute out of it when reaching the destination. :)
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

Of course ,,,,,, because it is more comfortable and funny
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

For extra long distances, airplanes are safer, plus if you are going somewhere like south america, you don't have to cross the Mexican border by car, or deal with drug lords. There are more car accidents than plane accidents, and there are also more deaths by car accidents than by plane accidents. Planes are also much faster, so if you want to go somewhere far away, you can spend more times there than you do traveling, which is always nice, unless you just want a road trip. Cars can be nice because you can always just get out and make lunch/dinner/breakfast or go to a restaurant, but then again, airports have food, and there is a lot of food that you can actually bring onto an airplane with you. Other than airsickness and the effects of air pressure on the ears, flying in airplanes is, in my opinion, fun. I enjoy the feeling of getting off the ground, and I even like turbulence in moderation. As far as packing is concerned, I must admit that I prefer cars, since you don't have to worry about what you pack in what luggage. You want a knife? No problem. No TSA will take it if you're in a car. On the other hand, though, you can always pack it in your checked luggage, and the TSA won't give you any trouble, and sometimes, they can ship it ahead for you. While airplane's leg room isn't usually optimal, you can always get up and walk up and down the aisle in the middle of you flight. And, you have a chauffeur, AKA pilot. Oh, and by the way, if you are ever bored in an airport and feel like being random, salute to the pilots when you walk by them. Most of them have been in the air force, and they really appreciate it.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

public transport kind of fast travel and food served
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: airplane

I say an airplane because an airplane can get you much faster to your point of destination.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

Airplanes are good for traveling long distances, but cars are more useful day to day. Cars can also be used for long distance traveling if necessary.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

long drives are beautiful too .. :)
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

i prefer cars over airplanes. you can stop whenever you want wherever you want. its scenic too. the most you get to see in an airplane are the clouds below, which get nauseating after a while =\
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

Firstly, travelling by cars is less expensive, therefore you can save your moneySecondly, cars are more suitable, because you can make a stop if it's necessaryThe third reason is that cars can be used by everybody, but airplanes can't, brcause some people are afraid of flying, also cars don't depend on the weather and climate so much like airplanes, therefore if the weather is bad, your flight will be canceled and it will destroy all your plans.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

i prefer cars to airplanes. You can go around enjoying the beauty of nature,the myraids of flowers around.If u find something interesting, u can stop and look around but that's not the case in airplanes, you need keep moving till ur destinations and u look off the windows u could just find those monochrome clouds.
Debate: airplane vs cars
Side: cars

From home to airplane and from airplane to your destination you use car :)
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I buy mostly local and/or organic. With animal products I care about the organic label. Knowing my food is free of added hormones is important to me, as is knowing the animals providing it have access to the outdoors. With grocery items, the organic label is more of a shortcut than something I care about directly -- those items labeled organic are more likely to have a simple ingredients list with real food items, which I prefer over long lists of mostly preservatives and chemical shortcuts. You do have to stay on top of greenwashing (and out-and-out fraud), but to me the value is worth it.As for cost, I've noticed, at least in our region, that while conventional food costs have risen dramatically lately, my grocery bill has not. The organic foods that come from the farmer's market actually cost less at this point than conventional foods at the grocery store, and organic grocery items are comparable or only very slightly higher. Using coupons available at the local co-op and shopping sales for those things not available locally, I usually spend less for organic grocery items than conventional ones, even on those things that cost more.What I don't believe is that one should feel morally superior for shopping organic or inferior for not. I shop that way because it makes sense for me, is easily available, and while we're not well off -- cooking is a hobby, so buying premium ingredients and spending less on entertainment and eating out than others might is a happy trade off.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I don't buy all organic, but we buy Organic Milk for our kids and Organic Fruit, Vegetables and Meat also seem worth the higher prices to me.By the way, buying local is as important to me for these kinds of foods.The main reason for buying Organic to me is to limit pesticide intake, to support sustainable food production and to get better quality produce.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I agree. I buy local and/or organic whenever possible simply to avoid pesticides, antibiotics, and genetically altered food as much as I can. I know it's impossible to avoid all carcinogens all the time, but if a little extra cash means I might be actively avoiding some of them, that's good enough for me.I also grow my own food whenever possible for the same reason. Plus, anything I grow myself seems to taste better. Nothing is quite as nice as the fruits and vegetables of my own labor.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I try to support my local farmers. Not all of them are organic however. I raise honeybees. In SoFla you cannot have organic honey because there are no two mile areas that are guaranteed to be chemical free.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

For some things (meat, fish, poultry, etc) I will pay the extra because the things that are fed to farm animals are horrifying. When it comes to fruits, vegetables, and grains, I would buy those if they were just a little cheaper and bit more variety.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I buy organic fruits and vegetables whenever i can at Henry's. All their produce is organic and it usually cost the same as non-organic products in other supermarkets.I also like organic milk and soy milk after my spanish teacher in middle school told our class a really disturbing story about the effects of non-organic milk on children. >__<I'm a vegetarian, so i don't know much about organic animal products, but the places that sell all organic produce in my area usually keep all the animal products organic as well.Except for dairy products, we usually find cheaper or same priced organic products. I've only seen organic dairy products cost a little more.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I buy organic fruit and vegetables, and buy locally. Fruit that hasn't been pumped with water so it'll stay shiny even after being flown round the world is more appealing to me, and I like being able to buy from markets and local shops. Supermarkets and monoculture make the world a soulless place. And while manic environmentalism isn't my thing, monoculture really is a problem, and since no-one else has mentioned it I will. Intensive farming of the same crop, which has been more and more common since the Industrial Revolution, is nowadays quicker and cheaper than having to deal with multiple fields of different crops. But growing stuff that uniform is bad for biodiversity, not least because hedgerows get destroyed, and is also dangerous. If a disease or pest destroys the year's cotton, it's a lot worse it that's the only thing you're growing. Look at the Irish potato famine - a massive catastrophe. Monoculture destroys the genetic diversity that's needed to stop species being universally vulnerable, reducing their risks of survival, while at the same time making huge numbers of people dependant on that survival. Not that I'm saying not buying organically is going to cause famine, but in the long run its a bad thing to have massive scale farming. You lose biodiversity AND genetic diversity within a species, and that's risky. There are also a lot of smaller-scale implications: planting the same thing year after year depletes the soil of the organic nutrients that sustain life, and that can cause desertification, and it'll reduce the quality of crops and crop yields. To combat this a lot of fertiliser is needed. But industrial fertilisers are inefficient, to the point that only about 10% of them are taken up by the crops, and the rest runs off and contaminates the surrounding. This causes bioaccumulation, which means animals and plants absorb things they're not meant to and then they build up in food chains and end up poisoning animals. It also causes eutrophication in lakes, which starves water of oxygen and kills fish (learn slightly more: http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=171975). .) So basically, organic food supports small farmers, which I think is good, especially if they're local and you're not just picking up the bag labelled organic in the supermarket. And - unlike the mass production in monoculture - it's also not horrifically bad for the environment, either in a long term killing-the-planet way or in an immediate poisoning-the-wildlife way. So why not pay a little extra?
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Animals suffer less - I'm all for less suffering.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Yeah. PROTECT THE SOIL. Lol yeah it is good for the environment (not healthier btw) but what the uneducated masses don't know will not hurt them :Dand I am sorta pro local food... not flying food in from abroad. But I do find it hard to stay away from those kiwis.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: No, I don't.

I agree that local food is good, but I cannot agree with your statement that "what the uneducated masses don't know will not hurt them." The cigarette companies said that same thing... ;)
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Only when its readily available, like right next to the other food, no going to different aisle for me.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Pick it up at the weekly farmer's market (most of it is organic). It doesn't cost any more, and the farmers are usually wicked cool. (And have you seen the chicks who go there!?) The reduced shipping distances from buying local organic also reduce fossil fuel consumption.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: depends

it depends what type of organic food it is.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Idk how much it costs. Its healthy and that's all that matters.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Healthy and better than diet crap. Organic peanut butter is pretty good.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

I don't buy all organic mainly because organic stores aren't that close, and the extra gas plus the extra price for organic, isn't always worth it. But I do prefer healthy eating, and if I had all the money in the world, I'd buy everything that didn't have preservatives and all those ridiculous chemicals in them. Plus, organic truly tastes better, (sometimes). It's a taste you got to acquire though; the first time you eat an organic cupcake, you might want to gag, but if you eat them enough, you'll love them.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Why spend more

What would you rather have organic food for more money or non organic and some spare change to buy other other stuff!
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

Yes, it's better for you and I feel healthier when I eat it... It doesn't matter about the money.. organic living will make you live longer.
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

comment deleted by satan
Debate: Are you buying Organic Food?
Side: Yes, don't mind paying more.

!?hahahahahahahahahaha.....................................................................