azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

This one is actually not a troll. She has been here for years and really ias as stupid as she seems.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

... oh dear god
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

If I was trolling you, you would know it. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You're right, and I do.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I am not trolling, and this conversation is off topic. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Golly gee I wonder why that might be. Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that you stopped putting forward valid arguments ages ago and are now just shitposting for the hell of it.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yes or no: Is abortion a right? .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yep, 14th amendment, roe vs. wade. That's been explained to you on this thread already by people who know it far better than me.My big issue with what you were posting was that you outright stated contraception would prevent the need for any abortions. That's bollocks.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Since you are new here: She doesn't understand fallacies, and she doesn't quite get the concept of rights. When she asks if something is a right she means "should it be a right". She also doesn't read arguments. Hopefully that helps you avoid frustration.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yeah I'm picking up on that now. Kinda sad, really
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Condoms are not always safe. A friend of mine was wearing one a while back and got knocked by a bus.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I'm sorry about your friend. There are other contraceptive methods available. :)
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

What is your solution to the millions of unwanted babies that would be born each year if abortion became illegal?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Thank you for asking a good question. I have multple solutions: Contraception to prevent conception of unwanted children, sex ed to education people on how to prevent conception, adoption reform, public awareness on adoption, welfare for those that need it, job traing, and I am probably forgetting something.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How exactly would you reform adoption?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Background checks for adoptive parents, ending the loop hole that allows rapists to have visitation rights with their children, and so on. Parenting classes for adoptive parents would also help.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

With the emergence of the brain damaging virus Zika abortion could very well become compulsory in some countries never mind a legal option. With experts predicting between 3 to 4 million cases there is no way many nations could provide the necessary welfare for such numbers. Even with this frightening disease gathering pace at an alarming rate the backward and superstitious teaching of the Roman Catholic Church is that abortion is an abomination in the eyes of God and the pregnancies where the presence of the Zika virus is identified must be allowed to proceed as normal. Apart from this new innovation the choice of abortion is exclusively a matter for the two partners involved providing their decision is compatible with the law and medical advice.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Even though I don't support it, abortion is a constitutional right. It is part of the rights life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. There isn't anything the government can do about abortion if there is no law disallowing it.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Well is murder a constitutional right? Last I checked, spontaneous generation was a belief we threw away years ago, it's impossible for living things to come from non living things...
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Some claim the life of the fetus has Constitutional rights. I don't buy that. Some of the founding fathers had slaves, and they didn't give women equal rights in the beginning including the right to vote. So it's laughable that somehow what they wrote was intended to apply to the fetus. But likewise, I don't think they had any thought in their heads at the time as to women having the right to abort their babies. It was nowhere on their radar. So Constitutionally I think it's a wash. There is neither a mandate to give the right nor a mandate to take it away.With all that said, i still think the Supreme Court is the only entity with the authority to rule on the matter for the country as a whole. And yes I do think they can rule for the WHOLE country. This type of individual behavior is not something at the whim of individual states. That would be like letting each state decide on racism or sexism or whatever. Certain basic human liberties need to be decided at the national level and I think abortion is one of them.Currently the Supreme Court sided with abortion rights. Perhaps the reason they made that decision in Roe vs Wade would go away if indeed it is Constitutionally a wash like I say. But then somehow nationally we still need to decide, I think that still should be the Supreme Court, and I actually think they'd still let it stand.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yep, and anyone who's says otherwise is a sexist, misogynistic pig who hates women.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

yes as it is somebody else's body and no government should dictate what somebody else should do with their body because they don't have a right to tell us what to do (unless we are being an indecent citizen)
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Abortion is not a Constitutional right, because it goes against the 14th amendment.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

not exactly.Allow me to explain how it became legal.It all began with this..................A Supreme Court Decision in 1973 that we called Roe v. Wade Ya see....Federal law has protected a woman's right to choose an abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.Norma McCorvey, the plaintiff, was an unmarried pregnant Texas woman who sought an abortion, but was denied one under Texas law. She filed a federal lawsuit under the pseudonym "Jane Roe" to have the Texas law declared unconstitutional. Roe argued that a law prohibiting her from obtaining an abortion violated her constitutional right to privacy.The U.S. Supreme Court, in 7-2 vote, agreed with Roe that Texas's law criminalizing abortion violated her right to privacy. But the Court held that states do have an interest in ensuring the safety and well-being of pregnant women, as well as the potential of human life.Acknowledging that the rights of pregnant women may conflict with the rights of the state to protect potential human life, the Court defined the rights of each party by dividing a pregnancy into three 12-week trimesters:During a pregnant woman's first trimester, the Court held, a state cannot regulate abortion beyond requiring that the procedure be performed by a licensed doctor in medically safe conditions.During the second trimester, the Court held, a state may regulate abortion if the regulations are reasonably related to the health of the pregnant woman.During the third trimester of pregnancy, the state's interest in protecting the potential human life outweighs the woman's right to privacy, and the state may prohibit abortions unless abortion is necessary to save the life or health of the mother.The Court further held that a fetus is not a person protected by the constitution. The decision in Roe v. Wade did not eliminate the controversy surrounding abortion, however. The laws surrounding abortion, ranging from methods, to funding, to parental consent and more, continue to be debated and shaped to this day. The following are a few examples.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Pro choice people keep telling us we can't tell a woman what she can do wit her uterous. Can you even imagine the lack of sincerity it takes to keep spewing such deceptive garbage? if the woman has trouble with her uterous, by all means do whatever you can to heal it. It's your body!If there is another living growing human life inside a woman's body, the mother has NO RIGHT to interfere with that baby's uterous by killing the Baby. Talk about hypocritical liars! They are the ones interfering with a Girl's uterous when they support killing her.There is no debating this type of clinical denial. These people who defend abortion (other than extreme cases) are either living in the shame and guilt of an abortion, and spend their lives attacking pro life people for making them feel bad, or simply want to be ble to eliminate the consequences of their choices.Have you ever heard such anger from pro abortion people? They are vicious and for what? They hate a pro life person for merely trying to protect an innocent life. No matter if you agree or not, why on earth would you be so hateful towards someone with the compassion to respect all innocent life?There can be only a couple reasons.... guilt or the desire to prevent the consequences of your choices.Now start talking again about life of mother or extreme cases to excuse the inhumanity.... LOL (NO ONE PREVENTS THOSE EXCEPTIONS) If you have a problem in your uterous where the Baby could cause your death, then no one is preventing your choice! QUIT USING THAT EXCUSE! IT MAKES YOU LOOK THE FOOL!
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

"Pro choice people keep telling us we can't tell a woman what she can do wit her uterous. Can you even imagine the lack of sincerity it takes to keep spewing such deceptive garbage? if the woman has trouble with her uterous, by all means do whatever you can to heal it. It's your body"!How dare you talk about uterus's when you cant even spell the word uterus right?"If there is another living growing human life inside a woman's body, the mother has NO RIGHT to interfere with that baby's uterous by killing the Baby". Um... Yes she does. Its her body and the baby cant even formulate thoughts yet. So she has every right. I mean, The baby cant pop its head out of her vagina and be like "yo I need you to not kill me. I know what I want to be when I grow up"."Talk about hypocritical liars! They are the ones interfering with a Girl's uterous when they support killing her".And if it is a male "baby" ? Or am I just lost ?"There is no debating this type of clinical denial". I deems this true. Proof ? Debating with you.T"hese people who defend abortion (other than extreme cases) are either living in the shame and guilt of an abortion", Last time I checked, I wasn't feeling any of those things a out abortion. Do not just suggest what people are feeling about thing."and spend their lives attacking pro life people for making them feel bad, or simply want to be ble to eliminate the consequences of their choices".Still suggesting what others feel."Have you ever heard such anger from pro abortion people? They are vicious and for what? They hate a pro life person for merely trying to protect an innocent life". Pro abortion people have its vicious people. Just like pro life people. Do not make pro life people sound so innocent."No matter if you agree or not, why on earth would you be so hateful towards someone with the compassion to respect all innocent life"?Since this was directed to someone else, I will not answer this."There can be only a couple reasons.... guilt or the desire to prevent the consequences of your choices".Suggesting again. ding."Now start talking again about life of mother or extreme cases to excuse the inhumanity.... LOL (NO ONE PREVENTS THOSE EXCEPTIONS) If you have a problem in your uterous where the Baby could cause your death, then no one is preventing your choice! QUIT USING THAT EXCUSE! IT MAKES YOU LOOK THE FOOL"!dingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingdiingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingding
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

Prostitution is something everyone with a vagina can do, and I know that there are some women out there who ''love what they do'', but I bet that 90% are there because of poverty, trafficking or somebody made them do it.No girl grows up dreaming about being a prostitue.Prostituion should not be made legal, they should take those girls and put them in homes, give them an education, so they can have a life worth living.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

Prostitution is something everyone with a vagina can doProstitution is something everyone can do. Period. and I know that there are some women out there who ''love what they do'', but I bet that 90% are there because of poverty, trafficking or somebody made them do it.Your point? Criminalizing prostitution penalizes what can be a safe and consensual exchange, while doing nothing to actually help those pushed into prostitution by the forces you name. If you are genuinely concerned about their well-being, then you should not advocate turning them into criminals and punishing them (usually with jail time and a fine which pushes them even further into dependency upon prostitution).[...] put them in homes, give them an education, so they can have a life worth living.Yes; housing, education, support, and going after the actual criminals (e.g. trafficking rings, etc.) makes sense. These can still be done, and are actually easier to do, when prostitution is legal.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

My point is, that prostitution doesn't really do any good to the society or to the victim (the prostitute). I agree with you when you say the prostitute is the victim, not the criminal. I don't really remember saying that. When I say that prostitution shouldn't be legal, that doesn't mean I imply that the prostitute is the criminal.There are multiple reasons why prostitution should be illegal, but I fail to see a solid argument why it shouldn't. You say that it's easier to give the prostitutes a home and education with prostitution being legal - how?
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

My point is, that prostitution doesn't really do any good to the society or to the victim (the prostitute).Arguably, this is true of a lot of things in society (e.g. fast food, video games, etc.); should me make things illegal in our society simply because they lack utility?Also, it is fallacious to assume that just because many/most prostitutes are victims that all of them are victims. To legislate on that basis, and to restrict the behavior of those entering into the industry of their own volition is illegitimate.I agree with you when you say the prostitute is the victim, not the criminal. I don't really remember saying that. When I say that prostitution shouldn't be legal, that doesn't mean I imply that the prostitute is the criminal. You support making prostitution illegal. That criminalizes the prostitute. Period.There are multiple reasons why prostitution should be illegal, but I fail to see a solid argument why it shouldn't.Pray, do tell, what are these multiple reasons you allude to? The only reason necessary to oppose a law restricting behavior is the lack of compelling reason to enact that law. That said, the criminalization of prostitution does not help those trapped in and exploited by the industry; it lands them in prison and/or exacerbates their financial troubles through fines, thereby pushing them further into the industry.You say that it's easier to give the prostitutes a home and education with prostitution being legal - how?If prostitution is illegal, then those who engage in it are at odds with the law and cannot be open about their engagement in that industry nor are they likely to trust the government when it says it wants to help them. It is unlikely that they would risk prison and/or fines by seeking help that they may not even receive, from an entity they do not trust to help them.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

You support making prostitution illegal. That criminalizes the prostitute. Period. I also support making rape illegal - does that make the one raped a criminal?Pray, do tell, what are these multiple reasons you allude to? The only reason necessary to oppose a law restricting behavior is the lack of compelling reason to enact that law. That said, the criminalization of prostitution does not help those trapped in and exploited by the industry; it lands them in prison and/or exacerbates their financial troubles through fines, thereby pushing them further into the industry.How ironic - I tell you that I fail to see a solid argument supporting prostitution, and you won't give me one?You talk about this subject as if there are only two solutions to choose from. Either we allow prostitution, or all prostitutes go to jail.There are four different ways to look at prostitution. Prohibiton, regulation, abolition and decriminalization.The prohibitionist approach is characterized by criminalization of all prostitution-related activities: soliciting, procuring, pimping, and brothel keeping. The regulation approach is characterized by the legalization and regulation of the sex industry. The abolitionist approach is characterized by the treatment of women and children used in prostitution as victims in need of services and the treatment of the buyers and traffickers as perpetrators. In this scheme, those who sell sex acts are decriminalized, whereas those who buy others for sex are criminalized.It is possible to make prostitution illegal, without making the victim (the prostitute) a criminal. Because there needs to be two people in order to call it prostitution - one to sell and one to buy.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

I also support making rape illegal - does that make the one raped a criminal?I am running out of different ways to explain what is an extremely simple and straightforward facet of law. If you make an action criminal then anyone engaging in it is a criminal. In the case of rape, the rapist; in the case of prostitution, the prostitute. How do you not get this? How ironic - I tell you that I fail to see a solid argument supporting prostitution, and you won't give me one?How is that ironic? I clearly explained why the burden falls to your advocacy and not mine; to restrict individual liberties one must have legitimate cause. You have utterly failed to address this argument, and I will take continued failure to do so as concession of the point. That said, I did give you an argument in defense of my stance and against yours. This, too, you failed to refute. You talk about this subject as if there are only two solutions to choose from. Either we allow prostitution, or all prostitutes go to jail.I have not advanced my stance on this issue, but have contained my remarks to refuting yours. Consequentially, I have not talked about the issue as you claim I have. But thank you for trying to put words in my mouth.There are four different ways to look at prostitution. Prohibiton, regulation, abolition and decriminalization.There are more than four different ways to approach the matter, but if the categories help you to order your thoughts on the matter so be it. I prefer not to limit myself.It is possible to make prostitution illegal, without making the victim (the prostitute) a criminal. Because there needs to be two people in order to call it prostitution - one to sell and one to buy.No, it is not. You are abusing the terminology. Prostitution is defined solely as the exchange of sex for payment. Solicitation is the purchase of sex. Trafficking is the selling of prostitutes for sexual acts to solicitors.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

Many prostitutes out there are highly educated and choose to work as a sex worker. Human trafficking and selling people as sex slaves is illegal and should remain illegal. This is a linked but separate issue. Illegality of prostitution increases the black market for sex slaves and human trafficking. If it is regulated, the call for this would be reduced and the remaining black market can be dealt with just like it is now.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

Thank you. job training and assistance is far more effective than prostitution.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

What about those who have a university education and still go into prostitution? The fact is that there are people who chose to go into prostitution and enjoy the sex trade.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

Prostitution is a sin and their is a higher risk of disease. No thank you.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

Their body. Their rights. You don't have the right to someone else's body.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

When they spread diseases, they have violated someone's body. No one has the right to make someone else sick. People have the right to be healthy.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

Your prejudice is astounding. Not all prostitutes are diseased. This is like arguing all gay people are diseased because they are more likely to have HIV. Judge not lest ye be judged.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

It is a known medical fact that multiple partners increases the risk of STDs.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: No

Prostituion should not be made legalIn Denmark prostitution is legal.hey should take those girls and put them in homes, give them an education, so they can have a life worth living.I don't understand. We're talking about adults. You want to force someone to stop doing something they have chosen to do and go for re-education? Sounds scary. No one should be punished for the harm they do to themselves.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

If you think prostitution is selfharm, then you are very unaware of what is going on.Have you ever heard of trafficking?No woman wants to be a prostitutue - most of them are forced to by other people, or because they need money to survive.I know prostitutions is legal in Denmark.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

No woman wants to be a prostitutue - most of them are forcedYou aren't being consistent, is it all or most? Just saying.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

Most. And when most women are forced into that industry, it shouldn't be legal.
Debate: Should prostitution be made illegal everywhere in this world?
Side: Yes

Can we make forced prostitution illegal without making prostitution illegal overall?