Debate: Global Warming, Voice Your Honest Opinion
Side: There should be action taken.

"What can possibly be offensive to me about dissent from my opinion?"Well i didn't just dissent from your opinion i excused you of coming to a conclusion basec on inadequate information, some people may find that offensive, and since i have no idea how much research you have done on this topic i thought it was fitting to include it."Furthermore, what art can you perform that could possibly mitigate my disapproval and still dissent?"Well there is no art i can perform that will mitigate your disapproval, its simply meant to convey the tentative nature of my disagreement."That all of the world's respiring organisms over the last 600 million years have had and continue to have a far more significant impact on atmospheric Co2 concentration than the factories that man has operated over the last 150."So you don't beleive rising CO2 levels have anything to do with it ok, fair enough, lets look at your claim. While i agree the contribution to the concentration of CO2 in the earths atmosphere larger from non-human entities that really isn't a valid bases for beleiving anthropogenic warming is a lie. The fact is our current eco system has evolved to accommodate that level of CO2, by releasing reapped CO2 from oil and gas we are disturbing the balance, of this there is no dispute even among global warming sceptics as the measurements simply don't lie. To think that this will have no effect is naive."Is there a warming trend?"Well the considering the strong correlation between exists between CO2 concentration in the atmopshere, and global mean temperature, i would say yes. "But do I accept that mankind can possibly have affected the world's climate to any significant degree in so short a time and with such a paltry amount of activity? A resounding no."While i understand your scepticism i don't agree, look out at what we have done to this planet, we have acquired gthe ability to drastically alter it, and we have used this abilty in the msot agressive wway possible over the last 150 years, our pumping of CO2 into the atmosphere has been relentless."In addition, I question the political motivations of the researchers that are charged with presenting the information they profess to have gathered."Again i understand your secpticism but there is scientific concensus on this, or as close to one as has ever been attained."Oh indeed? One was dispose to think that everything was managed by a bearded man sat behind a modest desk."No he was slacker so we had to replace him with all the interactions."Incomprehensible up to the point that we can start arguing based on our comprehension of them?"Yes."Yes, those are words."Yes i know."The climate has fluctuated to an incredibly great degree throughout the course of human history, sir."Really."4 degrees by 2100 is not enough to melt ice anywhere in the ice caps, if that figure is even correct."That figure is mroe or less accurate, and if realised will be catastrophic for the human race. You claim to know what is an isn't enough to melt ice caps, where exactly did you get your degree in climatology? Again i have to refer you to the fact that there exists a concensus among climate experts, the fact is the ice caps melt and re-solidify in a cycle, it has been calculated that a 4 degree rise in temperature will be enough to prevent them from re-solidifying. This is already well underway, and there is no shortage of evidence for it."It is irresponsible to urge the entire world into action based on a philosophical formality."Really, so you think it more responsible to comtinue with business as usual and just see what happens?I strongly urge you to read anything written by the famous scientist James Lovelock the man who who invented Gaia theory, and is also credited with discovering the problem of CFCs in the atmosphere, i have read four of his books and found them all equally disturbing. Not that i only read books and listen to people that support my opinion on this matter but frankly most of the main opponents of manm,ade global warming ive found are people with no real grasp of science, im not saying there a few credible scientists on the dissenting side but they are in the extreme minority.