azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

If youy can downvote me, I can downvote you. Hypocrite. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

trying using the reading skills you claim to have. I'm not whining about downvoting I am simply disputing the claim that you only downvote after you yourself have been downvoted.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you just proved it for me by downvoting my previous argument.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Hypocrite. If you can downvote me, I can downvote you. Those who downvote have no right to whine.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you claimed that I downvote first and yet I just proved I haven't downvoted you for a hour where as you just downvoted me a few minutes ago.Those who downvote have no right to whine.Freedom of speech.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

And I have the right to freedom of speech to call you on your hypocrisy. You are a hypocrite for whining about downvoting when you used three accounts to downvote me.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

This debate is about employers stalking their employees. What do you have to say about that?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

This debate is about employers stalking their employees. What do you have to say about that?The same question can be asked of you. You stated your opinion, but when asked to expand upon your opinion or when faced with counters, you added nothing. That is bad debating. Also, debates can have tangents. That's okay. And someone is debating poorly, that is on topic, because it is countering the arguments they have made.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Repeating yourself does not make you right. All you ever do is insult people to hide your own insecurities.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Can ban me from this debate idiot.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Ad homenim fallacy. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

doesn't change the fact that you're an idiot.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

If I am an idiot, you are a dumb piece of of useless trash.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Not as useless as you.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Ad homenim fallacy. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

If you casn insult me, I can stand up for myself. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

You have the right to your opinion.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Ad homenim fallacy. .Something you have been guilty of time and time again, particularly in this debate. Even though you may think it's ok, excessive downvoting is a form of ad homenim. Also, many of your arguments are very clearly copy and pasted. That is bad debating.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Stop using the word "right". Your first argument was good, then you started talking about rights and your argument derailed.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Thanks broski. What did you like about my first answer? .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You've really got to stop saying that.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Freedom of speech. I will say whatever I want. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

THen why is it wrong for potential employers to listen? And just because you have the freedom to say whatever you want, it doesn't mean that is polite, the right thing to do, or that what you have to say is correct.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Free speech is a right. I have done nothing wrong. It is wrong for employers to stalk their employees.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

So is your argument that you should have free speech, but no one should be allowed to listen to the things you have to say?Because that's what you are arguing right now. If you don't actually respond to this and simply restate your previous point, you are proving the points we have been making against you.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

It is wrong because your work only pays you for the time you spend working for them. If they are going to fire you for the stuff you do in your personal life they better pay you for staying clean.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Do you mean to say that the kind of person someone is can never have any impact on how they will behave at work? And by posting something to a public space, why shouldn't people be allowed to view this space?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Do you mean to say that the kind of person someone is can never have any impact on how they will behave at work?Basically. What job would be affected? There are rules for how you behave at work and what you do away from work will not show how you act at work.And by posting something to a public space, why shouldn't people be allowed to view this space?You aren't working, how are you supposed to look professional when you aren't working? There is nothing positive that can come from looking at it, only neutral and negative. The negative reaction is rarely justified so an employer should just avoid looking.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

If you are hiring someone to be a police officer and all their facebook posts are pictures of them slacking off at jobs; they post abusive comments; etc. etc. it can show that this is not a person that would be good for that job. It's why we have interviews; character evaluation is an important part of any hiring. Do you honestly think that if I do a really good job at my work but then spend the rest of the time breaking the law, slacking off, and being abusive there is no job out there that would care? You aren't working, how are you supposed to look professional when you aren't working? No one said that the employers were looking for you to be professional when you weren't working. There is nothing positive that can come from looking at it, only neutral and negative. Sure something positive can come from it. It's only one data point, and things like interviews, resumés, and references will obviously be more important, but if you see a person joking around with their friends on Facebook and you want to create a jovial environment at your work, that's a factor. The negative reaction is rarely justified so an employer should just avoid looking.Well, that's for the employer to decide, and if all that you are saying is true, an employer would probably know this. They are people too, and they understand that people aren't always profession in their spare time. But that doesn't answer the question I posed, which is why shouldn't people be allowed to view something that you post to a public space?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

If you are hiring someone to be a police officer and all their facebook posts are pictures of them slacking off at jobsPeople don't post pictures of themselves at work.they post abusive commentsPerfect for law enforcement, jk.It's why we have interviews; character evaluation is an important part of any hiring.If they can't figure it out in an interview they suck at their job as hiring manager.Do you honestly think that if I do a really good job at my work but then spend the rest of the time breaking the law, slacking off, and being abusive there is no job out there that would care?You aren't allowed to slack off in your free time? If you do a really good job it doesn't matter if you are abusive to people outside work. If you aren't actually getting in trouble for the stuff that can be seen in your photos how badly did you really break the law?No one said that the employers were looking for you to be professional when you weren't working.They are looking for unprofessional behavior in posts about the times you aren't working. You may not realize it, but that is what you were saying.Sure something positive can come from it. It's only one data point, and things like interviews, resumés, and references will obviously be more important, but if you see a person joking around with their friends on Facebook and you want to create a jovial environment at your work, that's a factor.So, that is what complete denial sounds like. No one will ever be hired because they can improve the work environment based on what is seen through facebook.Well, that's for the employer to decide, and if all that you are saying is true, an employer would probably know this. They are people tooThat's exactly why they won't know it. People react stupidly all the time.and they understand that people aren't always profession in their spare time.I disagree.But that doesn't answer the question I posed, which is why shouldn't people be allowed to view something that you post to a public space?I am saying they shouldn't do it. If the company doesn't pay you enough to judge your personal life then they shouldn't do it. Standard jobs don't pay near enough to get that kind of judgement.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

OK. If you want to speak like a chav then it is up to you. But I'm sure it will do nothing to fight the common conception on this site that you are unintelligent.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

I can easily read a college level neuroscience book. The title is "Neuroscience For The Mental Health Clinician". Stupid people would be unable to to read it. I know what hydrocephelic intrecranial pressue is. I know that cannabis is the scientific name for marijuana. I know what a genetic anomaly is. I know what a serotoninin neurepinephren reuptake inhibitor is.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

and yet you can't read and dispute simple arguments on a debating website.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

If you have such a problem with me, why do you even speak to me? Why waste your time?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Because you're a scourge to this site.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

No one is forcing you to speak to me. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

and back to ignoring points.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

still ignoring points.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You have the option to ignore me. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Well in that case you're letting yourself down by making yourself look stupid when you're not. You might not be thick but you make yourself look like it if you speak like a common wannabe Ghetto dweller teenage boy, say ridiculous things contrary to common knowledge like "England is not a democracy", "there is no such thing as a constitutional monarchy" and make it seem like you are unable to accurately comprehend someone else's post and respond with it with something relevant.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Thank you. I just feel strongly about many issues. :)
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

If you feel strongly about something, why give it less mental effort rather than more?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

The ability to read words is different than being able to understand what you read.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

I can read and understand college levfel neuroscience books. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

If everyone has the same perception of you except you - there are two possibilities:that everyone else is wrong, and wrong in the same way;or, you have a somewhat skewed internal perception of yourself.If you are still struggling with what it means to make something public, you may not be a good judge of your own intelligence.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

and yet you can't read simple comments.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You are the one refusing to read. If you have a problem with me, just ignore me.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

still ignoring the points. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

yes you still are ignoring points.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

If you can only figure out how bad an employee will be by looking at their facebook posts you suck at your job as a recruiter. We have succeeded in the past without needing to look at someone's profile.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Have you ever filled out a job application?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

you do know you're talking to Dana.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Employers do not have the right to the employee's personal information.Except it is you are required to give it to them in order to be hired.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Employers do not own their employees. Employers do not have the right to their em[loyee's online accounts. It is none of their business.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

everything you do online is public information how many times does this need to be repeated to you?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Employers do not own their employees.Yes they do.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

No they don't. Slavery is when one person tries to own another person. People are not property.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

No they don't.Prove it. People are not property.Yes they are.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

We hold these truths to be self evident that all people are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you have no proof.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You need to stop trolling. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

You're the only troll here.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Anyone that thinks people are property is the troll. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Prove it.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Prove me wrong. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You have no proof that I have no proof. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you have no proof that I have no proof that you have no proof.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you're the only troll here.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

prove me wrong.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

YOU need to stop trolling.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

I hate to say it, but at this point you seem to be as much of a troll as he is.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You have the right to your opinion. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

only applies to the government not businesses.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

It is wrong to violate the privacy of law abiding citizens. Employers do not own their workers.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

online activity is public information.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Law abiding citizens have the right to do what they want. Liberty is a right.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

right to do what they want.Exactly so employers have the right to look into the online activities of potential employees.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Employers do not have the right to their employee's online activities. You will not change my mind on privacy rights.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

according to you people have the right to do whatever they want so employers have the right to look into potential employees online activity.You will not change my mind on privacy rightsThen debating sites aren't for you.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Your right to speak doesn't include the right for you to speak in public and have people not hear.Make sense?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Employeres don't have the right to know what people do online.Yes they do it's public information.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

No they don't. People have the right to do what they want as long as no one gets hurt. If my employer pulled this, I would not share my online activities bacause I have the right to do what I want. It is none of employer's business what people do onlline as long as no one gets hurt. The Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful search and seizue against law abiding people. If my employer asked me about my online activities, I would refuse to answer. Privacy and freedom of speech are rights.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

except everything you do online is public information. Also the 4th amendment applies to police not businesses.I would refuse to answer. Privacy and freedom of speech are rights.And afterwards you'd be out of a job.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

You can't make something publicly available and claim it to be private at the same time.If I write something on a billboard, is no one allowed to read it?Put the shoe on the other foot - are you allowed to research someone you hire?If you are going to have a contractor come fix your house, would you be able to google them and see if anything turned up?Would you possibly check whether he has a violent criminal record? Whether he is licensed/bonded in your state, etc.?If he posts on his web page that is he actually just starting out in construction and doesn't really know what he is doing, but tells you that he has done it for years, is that relevant?Did you violate his privacy by accessing his publicly available facebook information?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You will not change my mind. Employers do not have the right to their employee's online accounts.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Do you have the right to read this post that I just wrote?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

then debating sites aren't for you.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Yes they are. I am fine with debating, but I will not change my mind on liberty.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

No they aren't you are currently refusing to debate.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Yes they are. I have no problem with proper debating, but I will believe whatever I want.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

I have no problem with proper debating,Yes you do you've never debated properly once.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you've already proved it for me.