azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

I don't think there is a "gay gene" per say, but rather a sexual disposition which is influenced by hormones.I consider it quite likely that everybody is inherently bisexual, but tend more in one direction than the other.Now I will admit that the idea that homosexuality rose primarily as a means to control populations is still a bit speculative, but this does seem to be the outward affect.Population control as an evolutionary mechanism would only arise if their was a danger to the species' food supply. It is extremely improbable for this to be the case. Homosexual animals would still eat food, and the primary factor governing population growth in a species is the availability of fertile females. In other words, we would be left with a smaller number of heterosexual males impregnating a larger number of females.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I think there is a lot of interesting research on the underlying genetic factors that influence sexual orientation.http://discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/born-gay/article_view?b_start:int=3&-C= one such study found a correlation between finger length and sexual orientation.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

Homosexuality is normal so far as nature's ability to conduct population control is concerned It is extremely unlikely that homosexuality is an evolved trait conducive to population stability. The great limit to the propogation of a species is food, and that fact cannot be reconciled with the theory in bold. Animal populations plateau when their consumption of food is equal to its production, or in the case of predator-prey relationships, the graph appears as two waves of different amplitudes but the same frequency, which are out of phase by about 0.5λ. We must remember that a homosexual animal eats the same amount of food as a heterosexual animal.Homosexual behaviour does not have the capacity to control a population for long; the most it could possibly do is slow its growth, as animals tend to produce as many offspring as can be fed, and the reproductive loss in ~3% of the poulation could easily be made up for by the other 97%.Even then, if genetically controlled as it would ahve to be to be an evolved trait, it would require two heterozygous animals to reproduce to be passed on to the F1, 2, 3 et cetera progeny, assuming that homosexual animals do not reproduce, and that homosexuality is recessive. There's a great deal more to be said on this, but I'll let you respond first.But for the sake of argument, even if it weren't that makes no more of a compelling argument for the simple fact that what is "normal" is entirely socially constructed. Slavery was normal in 1702.First, it must be said that at only ~9% of the population, homosexuality simply is not normal. However, I do not understand why that is relevant to whether it is morally justifiable or not. From what I observe, intelligence is not particularly common either. Does that mean, in the minds of the opposition, that intelligence is immoral (but then, we are opposing the religious in most cases, so the answer might just be yes)?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You're an incestaphobe.And you are a philistine. One can only wonder which is better.Ignorant bigot.Is that a signature?No it's not. Because hetrosexuality is NORMAL.Hetrosexuality? Never heard of it. Perhaps you meant heterosexuality? LOL WTF?The phrase I am not a homosexual conveys the general sentiment that one is neither enticed by or possessed of a proclivity to sexual acts between two males. This ironic rebuttal is brought to you by the Coca Cola soft drinks corporation. Why not read it while enjoying a nice, cool Coke?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

And you are a philistine. One can only wonder which is better....Is that a signature?...Hetrosexuality? Never heard of it. Perhaps you meant heterosexuality?...You are a funny little girl!The phrase I am not a homosexual conveys the general sentiment that one is neither enticed by or possessed of a proclivity to sexual acts between to males.LOL. Anybody who talks like you is a faggot. A kid trying too hard to sound smart. Who ends up sounding gay instead. Am I right? How old are you? I bet you're under 18. Fucking poshiton. Maybe you're in denial about your gayness. You'll realise you're gay once you start begging your dad to molest you again.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You are a funny little girl!SO you believe that I am a homosexual and interested in men, but also a little girl?LOL. Anybody who talks like you is a faggot.Kindling doesn't talk.A kid trying too hard to sound smart.There is no try. Only do, or do not. Who ends up sounding gay instead.I must confess, I do read your rebuttals with a profound mirth. Am I right?I very much doubt it.How old are you?Seventeen, as you would have known if you had bothered to look at my profile.I bet you're under 18.And the jackpot goes to...Fucking poshiton.I beg your pardon? Maybe you're in denial about your gayness.Perhaps you're in denial about my heterosexuality.You'll realise you're gay once you start begging your dad to molest you again.I sense repressed memories, cunty.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Seventeen, as you would have known if you had bothered to look at my profile.Lol. It's too obvious. Just a dumb little gay kid who tries to be smart by using words nobody uses in everyday life. Hope you're proud of your successful and productive life.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

LolYou laugh audibly quite often, it seems.Just a dumb little gay kid who tries to be smart by using words nobody uses in everyday life.Perchance your faculties of discourse are too stunted through malnutrition and want of exercise to penetrate the words hitherto expressed. Or perhaps the general mass of men is mistaken in its estimation of the constitution of intelligence and you are the lone savant railing against the ubiquitous misconception?Verily this vicious torrent of verbiage veers most verbose.Hope you're proud of your successful and productive life.I shall be all the prouder for having avoided the overwhelming temptation of growing up to become an adult who spends his time speaking dirtily to seventeen year old boys over the internet.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Wow. You must be proud that you can read and use a thesaurus. So assuming that you're actually straight, but just come across as a queer little cunt atleast we can assume that your experiences with a woman are limited. At best you got a peak of your mum's hairy nipples. You're either a straight (but gay) little pussy whose going to be a virgin until he grows some balls or a faggot little pussy whose going to partake in rape and sodomy for the rest of his life.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

WowWasn't that destroyed by a Cataclysm or something?You must be proud that you can read and use a thesaurus.Yes, I place that achievement next to heroically overcoming my allergy to idiots. I still can't stand to be in the same room as them, but I can at least hold conversations with them over the internet.So assuming that you're actually straight, but just come across as a queer little cuntI'd employ the old adage "When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me", but you're only really making an ass out of yourself. Have a shiny star!we can assume that your experiences with a woman are limited.Yes, I imagine you must be intimately acquainted with many women. I hear they are fond of colossal pricks.At best you got a peak of your mum's hairy nipples.Ah yes, a dig at my mother. You must be in great demand at parties.You're either a straight (but gay)Oh ho! little pussy whose going to be a virgin until he grows some ballsNo, you are mistaken. One's virginity is lost at the point when one first has sexual intercourse; not when one's testicles develop.faggot little pussy whose going to partake in rape and sodomy for the rest of his life.This conversation is itself both a molestation and sodomy:You're an asshole and you're getting raped.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Lol knew it. I won't even pat myself on the back for being correct. It was too easy.Have a nice day you queer, self important, posh, pussy and probably ugly virgin.I don't even have to add all the usuals of insecure etc. You probably know that yourself.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Lol knew it.You knew something?I won't even pat myself on the back for being correct.You might as well; I can't imagine the opportunity comes around too often.It was too easy.Telling oneself that one is correct is never difficult.Have a nice day youThank you.queer, self important, posh, pussy and probably ugly virgin.Back at you, you unemployed, foul-mouthed, sad, lonely moron who bombards seventeen year old boys with homosexual imagery and then infers that they are homosexual. Honestly, is this were you envisioned yourself?I don't even have to add all the usuals of insecure etc.Right. I'm insecure. Have a cookie.You probably know that yourself.How can one be truly self important and insecure at the same time?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You got 1 thing right. I'm foul-mouthed. But tell me where I've been wrong. Jew.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I'm foul-mouthed. But tell me where I've been wrong.Everywhere since birth, I imagine.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

So you have nothing on me. Pussy.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Haha I'm not gonna marry someone I don't love It's hard since I have no feelings for woman at allPlus I can reproduce dipshit through giving sperm for surrogacy
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Atleast you haven't been violated.So science is making up for your inferiority. Great.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I hope you have many children and then you find out one of them has chosen to live the "gay" lifestyle just so you have to choose b/t what you hate and what you love.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Lol ur funny but wat do u mean u have no feelings for women?Is dis like through ur whole life or jus adulthood?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Ask a few more questions and maybe you won't get any answers.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

pedophilia (note the correct spelling) is illegal because it has been determined that a child is generally not consenting, and incest is considered due to an inherent biochemical response in which people are attracted to members with different genetic makeup than our own.marriage is not a religious thing. It can be, mind you, but all a couple has to do to get married is sign a legal document. No priest, party, or cake is truly necessary. Additionally, Christianity is not the only religion in which marriage occurs. Why can a single religious belief overrule another religion that accepts homosexual marriage?why are you resorting to pathos instead of logos to prove a point?why don't you have any actual arguments rather than what were presumably rhetorical questions that in fact can be answered contrary to your intent?why?why?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

pedophilia (note the correct spelling)Re: paedophilia.Actually, both are acceptable.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Name ONE religion that condones homosexuality....They are none.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Well there are actually very few religions that are against homosexuality.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Laws can be changed. And when I was 13 i didnt mind engaging in sexual acts with my history teacher. In a similar note- werent MY rights being infringed upon because of the law you mentioned. And it has a little to do with being Christian and A LOT to do with health and well being. Incest is nasty. Full stop. Just because a so called biochemical response occurs dosent justify getting it on with your sister. If scientists were peadophiiles, all of a sudden they would find a startling new discovery. Later to be disproved- And to the detriment of young boys and girls. The same with homosexuality. Mix thetwo together and youve got a startling nasty combination.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Because anal is not natural and women and man can get pleasure them self otherwise. If not we were made to be a nuclear family... and procreate as well as explore the opposite gender.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Is it always about sex with you people who oppose homosexuality? You disgust me.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against misrepresenting God

Yes it is because the thing that is wrong with homosexuality is a man lusting after another man.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

How can you prove it's wrong?...............................................................................
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

There is nothing wring with two men (or woman) loving each otherIt's not a sunOr a diseaseOr a mental defectIt's a part of life There is no cureAnd by judging us you are committing an almighty sinGod will condemn you blah blah blah
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

And of course, we Americans ALWAYS reject unnatural things, such as plastic, air conditioning, eyeglasses, cars, etc.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

So what if it's not natural?So your saying a gay man should live his whole life pleasuring himself and never with another manWhereas a straight man can go out and have sex with woman?If the whole world procreated we would be over populated within years!!!!!!!We were made to live our lives to the fullest! Not to explore the other sex
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

It is completely unnatural for a man to hunger after another man's peter squeezin's, or his goddamned dirty ass.Any person who does is a sick, twisted fuck who should go play frogger on the I95 LOL
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

It's better to accept than hateIf your homophobic your lower in life than those you mock
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

So you think it's better to accept a cock in your ass than to call it wrong?Your opinion and $3 will get you a decent cup of coffee.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

YesI'm not the sick twisted individual right nowYou are. You are the one judging people for who they are. You are the one lowering your morals. You are in the wrong. We are in the right. You have no place on this earth if all you are going to do is spread hate. And the thing is, because you will never know the pain we have to induce because of pests like you, you wont stop being pests
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Hmm, sick and twisted is a relative term.These degenerates (on the other hand) are just nice, normal people that anyone should be proud to let watch their children?You are attempting to foist your twisted deas of right and werong upon me, who says that you have the authority to do so?Certainly not I.You have the authority to shove anything you wish, up your goddamned dirty ass.How many helpless creatures have suffered and expired within the foul confines of your man pussy?How many prostates have you ravenously devoured in your search for semen?YOU have no place on this earth, you miserable cock kisser, you and all of your shit eating ass pounding fuktard friends have no place at all( unless you count SanFrancisco).So the next time you are experimenting with your sexuality in the back alleys of Harlem, just remember this: Eliot Terrabonne spits on you and your ilk.The next time you are about to receive a mouth full of steaming turd from the vagrant stooped over you, remember this: Eliot Terrabonne doesn't give a obama assfuck what you think, you snerdgurgling swine.BWUHAHA
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Dude I just argued with you your not even fighting back what were my arguments to powerful for woose!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Who are you talking to, assfuck?What the fuck, are you twelve?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Actually he's 13 and the little fuck is rude as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I think it's actually Al Gore, trolling for children LI suppose it could also be the primate in chief's monster, doing the same LOL
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Well I never thought of that? Could be.... or maybe one of our SH buddies (sicko's)!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Its ok I guess but its on them

Geez man calm down!!! no need for harsh language ok geez shut up and take a chill pill or something all i said was that it was ok but its on them im on your side you should be yelling at those other guys geeez man.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Its ok I guess but its on them

Ok first off it was adam and eve not adam and steve second thats why god created man and women god didnt create man or women for nothing you know,but at the same time i think its ok for them just as long as they dont get married.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Ok first off it was adam and eve not adam and steveIt is quire impossible for Adam and Eve to be the progenitors of the human race, so the above is an entirely worthless argument.second thats why god created man and womenThere is no evidence to be had in support of this statement, thus it is not acceptable. ,but at the same time i think its ok for them just as long as they dont get married.Personally, I believe marriage should be abolished.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Proof?Any proof that god was real?Any proof that he created the world?No?Invalid argument!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Its ok I guess but its on them

Ok first off its about homo sexuality ok not god why are you arguing with me about god true yes I said god was real and all that but you havent even added that much detail you havent even said why they should get married your not going to win with a pathetic argument like that are you trying to change the minds of people who belive in him cause its not going to work your just wasting your time,Thats how powerful god is.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Its ok I guess but its on them

Oh and plus I never said it wasnt ok for gays to be together I just said It was ok but its on them so why are you arguing with me your suppose to be on my side are you trying to convince me theres no god remember this debate is about homo sexuality not god.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

People that are Gay and Lesbian were not "Born this Way" (Lady Gaga) They chose that life and this life is against Gods plan for them.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Right, because a random singer/musician's quote has merit on the fact that most homosexuals are born gay. Do you know any gay people? I doubt you do with that attitude.Going by Christian logic, there are gays that were born gay. God let them be born gay. Therefore, he intended for them to be gay. Therefore, since he also allowed OTHER ANIMAL SPECIES to be born gay, he must love all the gays just like his other children.Now get out of this Dark Age trend of ignorance. During the Middle Ages and Renaissance, more then 50% of all people were gay and bisexual. Get over it.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

No animal species are homosexual. Animals are always bi-sexual. 2. I find it rather interesting that you look to the infererior intelligence of animals to justify homosexuality. The Bible clely states that you are "born into sin"....But to say that God made someone Gay is absurd and ridiculous- As he never made any one a liar- they chose the path of dishonesty... world. The best bet homosexuals have in a Darwinian world is that its a genetic mutation, chemical imbalance o ttp://www.cfsh.net/2.htmlr something like that.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

OH really? People were born Gay? That's insane....Don't drag God into your crazy notions of Homosexual genetics... You have no proof...."Therefore, since he also allowed OTHER ANIMAL SPECIES to be born gay" Its funny how would use UNREASONING animals to justify homosexual behavior... I guess if everyone did stuff like that most of us would have multiple sexual partners(Male lions),we would be murderers, thieves, rapists, and pedophiles JUST because animals engage in these behaviors....
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You think people aren't born gay? Ever? Whatsoever? What a pathetic argument. The only difference between saying that and saying that nobody is born black is that you can't see homosexuality with your own eyes. You only want an excuse to mark it wrong by saying that it's a choice when it almost never is. I will admit, a small amount choose, but the only way they can choose is by lying to themselves or being born with the ability to choose. Also, you apparently did not see who I was replying to. I was arguing against the Christian ideal that God hates all gays because of a few verses from the Bible. So I used her bullshit logic against her. I used unreasoning animals as a comparison as an example of birth. You're, once again, under the impression that homosexuality is a choice. Get your head out of your ass. If you can't agree that it's not a choice, then your arguments will always invalidate themselves, because homosexuality is not a choice. You think people choose to be beaten and abused and denied of rights and psychologically traumatized, then you're merely a fool. Now, either agree that it's not a choice, or we're done arguing, because you have no argument.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Are you Crazy?! if people were born gay, explain identical twins with divergent sexual orientations...surely both of them should be gay.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Are you Crazy?! if people were born gay, explain identical twins with divergent sexual orientations...surely both of them should be gay. and its not christian logic that says God hates gays. If that were true, He would hate heterosexual liars,murderers, people like you,(who make fun of the Bible which you so beautifully described as "bullshit"), and pretty much everyone in the world! But naw a real christian knows God loves all of us..Including The homo.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Am I crazy? No, apparently you are for believing that homosexuality is never something someone is born with.Twins have identical DNA, it identical twins, but what you don't realize is that DNA has no merit on personality. Identical twins fail to have identical brain chemistry. One being born gay and another not being born gay is perfectly logical therefore. And if one mayhaps chose to be gay, instead, then it was because he/she has the born ability to do so.Well, the fun with Christian logic is that there are Christians who DO think that your God hates everyone who isn't White, Christian, Protestent, Straight, Males. So according to the logic of many Christians, God hates homosexuals due to a few versus of the Bible. I commend you if you do not believe this likewise, but that makes me wonder, why are you arguing against homosexuality if you do not believe that homosexuals are evil as dicated by your holy book?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Naw dude i think HOMOSEXUALITY is evil.But not (necessarily) the person.So what your saying is people can be born with a sexual orientation that does not contribute to this life processes' function?What type of evolution is that?If that were true that probably makes homosexuality a disorder...( Not saying I believe in evolution LOl)Oh and the Bible says God would rather if all would be saved and not have to go to hell.Thats clearly SOME type of concern ain't it? Hate is too a strong word for this era, In fact he never did hate Homos, He just HAS a strong abhorrence for it.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

And for those "Christians" I express my grief and sadness.