azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Civil wars are sacred grounds. Of course the force has to be limited or else it will be considered as an InvasionAfter we blow up Assad's chemical weapons, do you think we'll be finished? No, him and his allies will retaliate against us. We'll end up putting boots on the ground.Just to let you know, I'm pretty sure that attacking Syria is just an excuse for us to go to war with another country. I'll let you guess which one.The report states that Russia's support will only last till Assad was proven guiltyRussia will continue to support Syria no matter what. That is their closest Middle Eastern ally. They even have a naval base in Syria. Also, Syria buys their equipment from Russia. If we take out Syria's chemical weapons, Russia will replace them.The rebels has complete access to Chemical Weapons and they were caught using one in battle. Its just America again jumping on the conclusion that Assad is behind itSo, now you don't support going to war? We're defending the rebels. Assad is the enemy if we go to war.But this isnt a war. This is justice. Your a coward if you will ignore the voice of the innocentsDon't try and turn this around on me. You're sitting in your fucking air conditioned house on your computer chanting "go to war!" What are you going to do to support this war that you believe so much in? I'm going to say it again and again until you respond to it... go enlist. Are you crippled? Unhealthy? What is your excuse? Maybe you aren't trained... don't worry, they'll train you! Unless the deaths are caused by banned weapons in a massive scale, the UN is powerless to intervene.How about we go after Russia for selling them those banned weapons? Are you down for that?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

After we blow up Assad's chemical weapons, do you think we'll be finished? No, him and his allies will retaliate against us.No because a personal vendeta among counties does not exist in an allience. Russia will continue to support Syria no matter what.This is the part where I will ask you to prove it.So, now you don't support going to war? We're defending the rebels. Assad is the enemy if we go to war.I was saying that America has a chance of being wrong in their suspicions (again) Nothing more.Don't try and turn this around on me. You're sitting in your fucking air conditioned house on your computer chanting "go to war!"Do you think that a war is played on the battlefield alone? I pay my taxes, and I have the right to decide where I want it to be used.The number of countries that support a strike against Assad is growing. Why do you resist?How about we go after Russia for selling them those banned weapons? Are you down for that?Actually, no one knows who sold those Chemicals. And even if we do, it is unrighteous to punish a business man when he is unaware of where the costumer will use it.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

No because a personal vendeta among counties does not exist in an allience.Uhhh... what? Iran already said that they would retaliate if we attacked Syria. Hell, they're even calling for us to be attacked right now!This is the part where I will ask you to prove it.Here's some!Here's some more!Here, take this one too...And this one...Alright, I'll stopI can give you some more if you want...?I was saying that America has a chance of being wrong in their suspicions (again) Nothing more.What's your point?Do you think that a war is played on the battlefield alone? I pay my taxes, and I have the right to decide where I want it to be used.I'm not an idiot. I know how a war works. You may pay your taxes, but that doesn't give you the right to call people who don't support going to war "cowards". You aren't a leader, you aren't involved in the military. If you want us to play the offense in this war, then you need to be out their with our soldiers... or else YOU are the coward.The number of countries that support a strike against Assad is growing. Why do you resist?The number of American's who don't support going to war is increasing. Why do you resist?Actually, no one knows who sold those Chemicals. And even if we do, it is unrighteous to punish a business man when he is unaware of where the costumer will use it.You said it yourself... chemical weapons are banned. Russia knew that when they sold him those weapons.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

Uhhh... what? Iran already said that they would retaliate if we attacked Syria. Hell, they're even calling for us to be attacked right now!Its the code of allience to protect your ally. But once the fight was over, any plot for revenge will be shunned upon.I can give you some more if you want...?I just read it. its all just the same news about Russia sending fleets for Syria. But in end, the situation all says the same thing;"Referring to the gas attacks in Damascus on Aug 21, these countries said: "We call for a strong international response to this grave violation of the world's rules and conscience that will send a clear message that this kind of atrocity can never be repeated. Those who perpetrated these crimes must be held accountable.""Just as what your articles said, Russia will only protect Syria as long as it proves itself worthy of being protected.What's your point?You are jumping on the conclusion that there was proof that Assad was behind the attack. But theres none (not yet)You may pay your taxes, but that doesn't give you the right to call people who don't support going to war "cowards"Sorry, but people who turns a blind eye towards inhumane actions are called "cowards". The number of American's who don't support going to war is increasing. Why do you resist?Because I prefer to listen to the voice of what has to be done.You said it yourself... chemical weapons are banned. Russia knew that when they sold him those weapons.Selling chemical weapons are banned. But selling deadly toxins isnt. Anyone can buy toxins by simply promising to use it for scientific purposes. But loading it on rockets is a different issue
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Its the code of allience to protect your ally. But once the fight was over, any plot for revenge will be shunned upon.And when do you think the fight will be over?I just read it. its all just the same news about Russia sending fleets for Syria. But in end, the situation all says the same thing;I was giving you multiple articles because I wanted to show how many different news agencies have covered it."Referring to the gas attacks in Damascus on Aug 21, these countries said: "We call for a strong international response to this grave violation of the world's rules and conscience that will send a clear message that this kind of atrocity can never be repeated. Those who perpetrated these crimes must be held accountable."" Did you read the entire article? You're quoting Susan Rice's statement that was made by her and our allies. Russia is still going to support Syria. Just as what your articles said, Russia will only protect Syria as long as it proves itself worthy of being protected.Russia is going to protect Syria if we attack them. End of story. I can break down each article word for word if you'd like, because apparently you don't understand. I'm not trying to offend you, but you really aren't getting it.You are jumping on the conclusion that there was proof that Assad was behind the attack. But theres none (not yet)Obama has already made up his mind on who he wants to go to war with. Like I said, I'm sure there are ulterior motives behind going to war with Syria.Sorry, but people who turns a blind eye towards inhumane actions are called "cowards".I'll say it again... go enlist. Don't worry, you can take your time, because if we do go to war... it's going to last longer than 90 days.Because I prefer to listen to the voice of what has to be done.This doesn't have to be done. Syria didn't want to go to war with us.Selling chemical weapons are banned. But selling deadly toxins isnt. Anyone can buy toxins by simply promising to use it for scientific purposes. But loading it on rockets is a different issueI didn't say Russia sold Syria toxins. They sold them chemical weapons... which as you just pointed out, are BANNED.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

And when do you think the fight will be over?When the government surrenderedDid you read the entire article? You're quoting Susan Rice's statement that was made by her and our allies. Russia is still going to support Syria.Nope, it was message given by G20 leaders. Russia is going to protect Syria if we attack them. End of story."Russia could approve military strikes against the Syrian government if the West presented watertight evidence of chemical weapons crimes but warned the use of force without UN approval would be an "aggression."Their loyalty is limited. End of storyObama has already made up his mind on who he wants to go to war with. Like I said, I'm sure there are ulterior motives behind going to war with Syria.I support Obama for now.I'll say it again... go enlist.To die for the sake of doing what right is an eternal joy. But the fact that I contributes the most behind their backs is my physical limitationsThis doesn't have to be done. Syria didn't want to go to war with us.Justice isnt something that you choose.I didn't say Russia sold Syria toxins. They sold them chemical weapons... which as you just pointed out, are BANNED.I made my researchRussia says: "Russia supplying Syria with chemical weapons is 100% false. Supplying conventional weapons "which can" be modified to support a chemical weapons program is not even in the same ballpark as "supplying" chemical weapons. You can modify a pipe into a pipe bomb. Does that mean Ace Hardware is "supplying" pipe bombs?"
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

When the government surrenderedHow long do you think that will take?Nope, it was message given by G20 leaders.Ugh... "Susan Rice and our allies" consists of a few G20 leaders. The G20 is divided on support for the war. I believe only nine out of the twenty nations actually support attacking Syria."Russia could approve military strikes against the Syrian government if the West presented watertight evidence of chemical weapons crimes but warned the use of force without UN approval would be an "aggression."If you paid attention to the rest of the article, you would realize that does not mean that they will no longer support Syria. What it means is "You can legally attack Syria if you find evidence, but we're still going to support them". If America attacks Syria, whether it be before evidence is found or after, Russia is still going to defend them.Justice isnt something that you choose.It is in this case."Russia supplying Syria with chemical weapons is 100% false. Supplying conventional weapons "which can" be modified to support a chemical weapons program is not even in the same ballpark as "supplying" chemical weapons. You can modify a pipe into a pipe bomb. Does that mean Ace Hardware is "supplying" pipe bombs?"Of course Putin is going to deny that he supplied Syria with chemical weapons. It's illegal! Assad is denying that he gassed his own people. Do you believe that? The rebels are denying it too. So someone is lying... do you just believe everyone? There are more articles stating that Putin DID supply Syria with chemical weapons, then there are that say he DIDN'T.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

How long do you think that will take?Haste makes wasteThe length of time is the last thing to worry aboutThe G20 is divided on support for the war. I believe only nine out of the twenty nations actually support attacking Syria.11 actually. Namely: Australia, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Turkey, Britain and the United StatesIf you paid attention to the rest of the article, you would realize that does not mean that they will no longer support Syria.That would be considered illegal and Putin's people will be his own enemy if he do so.It is in this case.It isnt, and never shouldOf course Putin is going to deny that he supplied Syria with chemical weapons.The Code of Justice states:"Everyone is innocent until proven guilty"It doesnt matter how many people condemns him. If there is no evidence, there is no punishment
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

The length of time is the last thing to worry aboutThe longer we're there, the greater our deficit will increase. Our gas prices will go up as well. 11 actually. Namely:Britain doesn't really count. They voted against military action... so it's more like 10.That would be considered illegal and Putin's people will be his own enemy if he do so.Legalities won't matter. Russia will veto the UN Security Council's vote to go to war and then America will be going after Syria illegaly. This is similar to the Kosovo situation in 1999. The UN Security Council was held up by a Russian veto and American and NATO forces still intervened illegaly. It doesnt matter how many people condemns him. If there is no evidence, there is no punishmentAssad hasn't been proven guilty. The rebels haven't been proven guilty. So who do you think we should attack, because according to you... everyone is innocent so far?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

The longer we're there, the greater our deficit will increase. Our gas prices will go up as well.Small price for the safety of the troopsBritain doesn't really count. They voted against military action... so it's more like 10.The rest are unsure or against isnt it? The number of those who supports it are growing. Why are you scared of fighting for what is right?Legalities won't matter.It matters. How can you make the people follow you when they know that you are protecting a criminal? And it appears like you are judging Russians in a racist mannerAssad hasn't been proven guilty. The rebels haven't been proven guilty. So who do you think we should attack, because according to you... everyone is innocent so far?Exactly why the UN is studying the case.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Small price for the safety of the troopsWe are TRILLIONS of dollars in debt. Our other war that we are currently in has also increased the debt... and guess what? Our troops are still dying. The difference between our war with Al Qaeda and the war with Syria, is that Al Qaeda attacked us first... Syria hasn't attacked us! Attacking the Syrian government will strengthen al Qaeda... our main enemy.The rest are unsure or against isnt it? The number of those who supports it are growing. Why are you scared of fighting for what is right?The number of American's who DON'T support it is growing as well. Other countries shouldn't speak for our country. If the American people don't want to go to war, then America shouldn't go to war! It's that simple. This isn't our problem. Why can't the other countries deal with it? Why are we the police of the world? We have more important problems we need to focus on.It matters. How can you make the people follow you when they know that you are protecting a criminal? And it appears like you are judging Russians in a racist mannerA racist manner? Give me a break! You're obviously running out of arguments, not that it matters though, because you never understood what you were talking about in the first place. I know how Russia is. They're allies with most of our enemies. They still hold the cold war mentality. Also, you apparently didn't read the rest of my comment. Russia will veto the attack, we will still go to war. We'll be breaking the law, not Russia! If you don't understand what we're talking about, then just admit it. You continually ignore most of my keypoints and misunderstand the others.Exactly why the UN is studying the case.You want to attack them, so who do you want to attack? You've clearly already made up your mind.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

We are TRILLIONS of dollars in debt. Our other war that we are currently in has also increased the debt... and guess what? Our troops are still dying.The attack makes a mockery of the UN laws, endangers the neighboring allies and leaves the rule open for terrorists to do the same.Soldiers always die, they are aware of that. Their question is what they will die for. Other than being war weary, I see no other reasons not to fightAttacking the Syrian government will strengthen al Qaeda... our main enemy.NopeThe number of American's who DON'T support it is growing as well. Other countries shouldn't speak for our country. If the American people don't want to go to war, then America shouldn't go to war!All the moral reasons to fight leans with us, we have the capability to help and the international support is growing. Yet you still refuse to act nor accept the name "coward". You disgust meI know how Russia is. They're allies with most of our enemies.Russia will veto the attack, we will still go to war. We'll be breaking the law, not Russia!You cant judge a person by whom they hang out with. Even Russia has a taste for JusticeYou want to attack them, so who do you want to attack? You've clearly already made up your mind.I made up my mind to punish those who violated the law. But I am not to quick to jump on the conclusion on who is responsible for it. Is there a problem?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Soldiers always die, they are aware of that. Their question is what they will die for. Other than being war weary, I see no other reasons not to fightI gave you reasons, you're just too naive to understand them. NopeYour links never support your arguments. Did I ever say that the Syrian rebels were dominated by al Qaeda? No. Al Qaeda is supporting the rebels and fighting among them. Al Qaeda actually led the rebels in an attack on a Christian village the other day. If the Syrian government falls, the second greatest military influence in Syria, al Qaeda, will take over. ArticleAll the moral reasons to fight leans with us, we have the capability to help and the international support is growing. Yet you still refuse to act nor accept the name "coward".You don't know shit. You can call people cowards all day, but you are completely ignorant on this topic. You thought al Qaeda was a person... let me repeat that... YOU thought our biggest enemy was a PERSON. You disgust meYour ignorance disgusts me. How can you know so little about the world you live in? You cant judge a person by whom they hang out with. Even Russia has a taste for JusticeAre you Russian? You sure do defend them a lot. I recommend you take a few hours to do some research. I made up my mind to punish those who violated the law. But I am not to quick to jump on the conclusion on who is responsible for it. Is there a problem?You aren't punishing anyone. You're sitting on your ass saying "Justice must be served!". It's absolutely pathetic. What makes it even more pathetic is your lack of knowledge on the subject.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

I gave you reasons, you're just too naive to understand them.The reasons you gave are acts of selfishness and self importance. I can see the logic, but not the righteousnessIf the Syrian government falls, the second greatest military influence in Syria, al Qaeda, will take over.Exactly the reason why military intervention must come. With the force of the UN, you can take down Assad, protect the innocents and renew their congressYou thought al Qaeda was a person... let me repeat that... YOU thought our biggest enemy was a PERSON.You thought Eben Alexander is a ChristianYou measured a woman's purity by her hymenWe are all humans, we make mistakes. The important thing is how we learn from itYou don't know shit. You can call people cowards all day, but you are completely ignorant on this topic.Your ignorance disgusts me. How can you know so little about the world you live in?Your attitude in defeat marks your worth as a person. Funny how you condemn Malachi's immaturity but you are not so different Are you Russian? You sure do defend them a lot. I recommend you take a few hours to do some research.Judging a person by his origin is a form of racism. Doesnt matter where I came from. It is the voice of reason that should be taken focus onYou aren't punishing anyone. You're sitting on your ass saying "Justice must be served!".I already said the reasons right?To die for the sake of doing what right is an eternal joy. But the fact that I contributes the most behind their backs is my physical limitations
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

The reasons you gave are acts of selfishness and self importance. I can see the logic, but not the righteousnessI've given you articles, I've given you history lessons, I've had to correct you multiple times... you just don't understand. Look at the BIG PICTURE.Exactly the reason why military intervention must come. With the force of the UN, you can take down Assad, protect the innocents and renew their congressWait... so now you think Assad is innocent? What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?You thought Eben Alexander is a ChristianThat has nothing to do with this debate... but he is a Christian, at least he claims to be. That's just another example of your ignorance.You measured a woman's purity by her hymenNo I didn't. You apparently don't understand any of our debates.We are all humans, we make mistakes. The important thing is how we learn from itYou don't learn. I've been trying to teach you. You only catch the simple stuff. Sorry, but it's true.Your attitude in defeat marks your worth as a person. Funny how you condemn Malachi's immaturity but you are not so differentYou called me a "coward" and said that I "disgust" you. I decided to stoop down to your level for a little bit. We could have a group vote if you want to see who had the better arguments. You'd be suprised how you're arguments appear to outsiders.Judging a person by his origin is a form of racism. Doesnt matter where I came from. It is the voice of reason that should be taken focus onYou don't seem to know much about Russia. To die for the sake of doing what right is an eternal joy. But the fact that I contributes the most behind their backs is my physical limitationsWhich is probably just a load of BS.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

Look at the BIG PICTUREThe bigger picture is that more and more innocents are stuck in mindless violence.The bigger picture is that we have the power to change it yet the majority of the population prefer to delude themselves in their cowardiceWait... so now you think Assad is innocent? What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?Let me rephrase that to: "With the force of the UN, you can take down the one at fault, protect the innocents and renew their congress"Thanks for pointing it outThat has nothing to do with this debate...I can say the same thing to yoursNo I didn't. You apparently don't understand any of our debates.You don't learn.You can check out your words. The debate topic is still alive.You called me a "coward" and said that I "disgust" you.What else do you wish to be called?We could have a group vote if you want to see who had the better arguments. You'd be suprised how you're arguments Bragging about achievements are done at FB. But if thats what can raise your self-esteem, then sure.Whatever floats your boat, I guessYou don't seem to know much about Russia.You seem to overestimate your knowledgeWhich is probably just a load of BS.I pity the fool