azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: Yes

I told you before there isn't more than one form of Christianity. That is factually untrue. From Catholicism, to Eastern Orthodox, to the dozens of forms of Protestantism, to the Coptic Church, there are many forms of Christianity. There may be only one Bible (not technically true, since there are quite a few versions with different translations, some of which change passages meanings quite substantially), but there are many different interpretations of it. My question is completely valid: Which one of those many forms of Christianity do you adhere to and think has the valid form of Christian Values?That is not cynical, as I have demonstrated multiple times, and it was not intended to upset you, as I demonstrated multiple times. It is incredibly arrogant to think you know my intent better than I do, and to accuse me of lying simply because you became defensive at implications that were not existent within my comments.
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

Fair enough. But tell me, which Version of Relativity Theory do you believe in? The Original or 2.0?
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: Yes

Can you be more specific as to what you mean by "2.0"? Do you mean to ask if I believe in the Theory of Relativity as it originally was, or the most "updated" concept of it? I suppose it is irrelevant, as I really do not know.But I am hoping that your "fair enough" is you saying that you now understand that my original post was not meant to be antagonistic in any way, and if so, I really was wondering which "form" (I honestly don't know which term you would prefer, sect maybe? or affiliation) of Christianity you adhere to. I can understand if you believe it is the only true one, I am not trying to imply otherwise, I was just looking for an affiliation so I could better understand where your opinions on the matter were coming from.
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

Mohammed was a murdering pedophile. He told his followers to do what he did. Islamic terrorists are not radicals. They are conservatives. They do exactly what their prophet told them to do.
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

I answered NO because of Sharia Law that calls for the execution of homosexuals.
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

Video discussing Islam from an ex-Jihadist Terrorist https://youtu.be/df1OzG0bDcU
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

Is the Pope Italian?
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

(and since I know there's going to be someone who doesn't get it.... I know the Pope isn't Italian)
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: Yes

(It was a good joke, no worries, lol. I thought it was funny, anyway.)
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: No

Of course it isn't. A peaceful religion wouldn't incite so much violence among it's followers. They only tell us it's peaceful so we won't stop them from their whole "the whole world will be Islam in 1000 years" quest.
Debate: Is Islam peaceful?
Side: Yes

Well, Islam as a whole is not that violent. In I have known affiliates who are Muslims and they are not such war freak. Islam as a whole is not violent and their philosophies encourage peace and brotherly love. I cannot prove it through passage since I am not a Muslim but through keen observation of their attitude well it tells a different story. Only Islam groups are violent whom have a different mindset on their religion. Plus external factors affect their violence like problems in family, land, money or etc.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think it's better to have a lousy father then to be fatherless because, in my opinion, most dads are lousy in some way. For the most part, dads just go to work and then sleep or watch tv for the remainder of the day. My dad, for example, there are times when I hate him and I think he's a lousy father, but when it comes down to it he is my dad and i love him. If I didn't have a father I wouldn't be able to say that and I would probably spend my whole life trying to find out who he is anyways! I rather know who my father is, even if he is lousy, then to not know anything about him at all.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

Imagine growing up not knowing who your father is. I can't imagine it because no matter how lousy my father is I still go home everyday after baseball practice and know that my father is trying to help my mom pay the bills. I believe that it is better to have a lousy father than to be fatherless because if you grew up without a father then you would be raised by a woman, which there is nothing wrong with that, but if your a boy than you would rather be raised by a mom and a dad. All in all having a father makes you have that comfortable feeling every time you go home.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

It's better to have a father than to not have one. For example, me. I grew up without a father and if I had a choice of being a billionaire or to have a father growing up, I'd choose to have a father. I'm basically a bastard legally because he isn't even on my birth certificate. No one should grow up without a father because honestly, it messes with them. Kids in school will ask about your dad and you have nothing to say. Whether he is lousy or not, a child should always be in touch with their dad. Even if he isn't with the mother anymore.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Fatherless

Yes it would be difficult to not have a father and you may think about all the things you have missed if you had a father groeing up, but it is also difficult when you have one that doesn't care. That also messes you up as well. I grew up with a crappy dad and I honestly believe I would be better off if I had grown up without one. It hurts you more to know you have a dad that doesn't give a crap what's happening with you and what's going on in your life.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think it is better to have lousy father than having no father because anyone is capable to change. By personal experience not every body remains the same. My dad use to be a hard core alcoholic, waking up in the morning and having a drink was a part of his routine. All day every day; but when he was in an accident a hit and run and immediately paralyzed his life changed. My dad has been sober for the first time in 20 years. And now I can actually go visit him and have a decent conversation with him. So I guess from my personal stance I would say that I would rather have a lousy father than no father at all. Because if I were to say I didn’t want a father I would just be speaking out of anger and revenge. Doesn’t matter what people that we love have done to us. We are all forgiving to those who are more important to us than others.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

Good personal side of the arguement, and yes, anyone is capable of change with a second chance.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I believe it is better to have a lousy father than to have none. It is important to have a role model to look up to and without that figure, you might become lost in the world. A lousy father is not that bad because what exactly makes a lousy father, always working and not having time for you. A father that isn't always around is no reason to prefer to have no father. Growing up and seeing the way your father is, makes you want to become like him or gives you the motivation to surpass him and become even better than he is.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

My parents divorced when I was one, meaning that I never had the chance to live with my father. Still to this day I call my dad and talk to him, I feel that no matter how lousy your father is he is still your father. My father is very lousy he never comes to visit me or never bothers to ask how I’m doing, but at the end of the day all that matters is that I have a father. I still wait for that day to come when my father will have a change of heart and become the father I always wanted him to be. I strongly believe that being able to have a father in general gives you hope for that special day where he will change but if your fatherless than there’s no hope for him to change.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

Fatherless seems like the easier choice you never know the lousiness or the neglect however there will always be that void. Sooner or later in life you will stop and ask yourself these questions would he have been a good dad? would we have gotten along? why did life taken hime away? Your heart will be in need of something to fill that void and usually it will be anger, anger at losing your father, anger at the world. However having a lousy father is no different you still will ask yourself these question why is he so lousy why cant he be like other fathers? The only diffenrence is how you fill that void, when you know what a bad father looks like and what he has done, you have a chance to corect that void a not becom like him a chance to tear the vicous cycle and be a better father. If you never had a father how would you know what a good or bad one looks like. There is a higher chance a falling victim to that vicious cycle
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think it's better to have a lousy father than to be fatherless because, growing up without a father can be hard for some kids. For example, there are some children that need dads to teach them right from wrong, but as long as you have a father no matter how lousy he is, at least you have somebody their to support your decisions and encourage you.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

Stating that my father died wen I was 8yrs. old, I would rather have a lousy father then to not have one at all. Without a father you really don't have a man in your life that you can talk to and go to to talk about situations and the care that they give and even the discipline. Even if you don't have a father you look for a mans view point or someone that you can convide in which means you still are searching for a father figure if you don't want one. I would rather have a lousy father that can have help to become a better father and that I can talk to, give me a firm hug when I need one, walk me down the aisle when its time for me to get married, and a father for my boyfreind could meet, so he can tell me if he's right or not even if I don't agree. I'm missing all that and more, I would do anything in the world to have my bestfreind and the one man besides God that I love, back on the earth with me. Therefore I would rather have a lousy father rather than not having one at all.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

Having a Lousy father would be better than being fatherless. If you have a Lousy father you can look at his mistakes, and avoid them. Also being fatherless would be hard on you and your mom. You would have no example or any kind of person to look up to. If you need help, at least you have your father there to lend you a hand, even if he is lousy.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

It is better to have a lousy father because; when it comes to a father he is not only a provider but also a protector. Almost every father is lousy, because they go out and work without giving much time to their children. Some children grow up without a father thinking that they had a father, in any shape or form.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

When I think about this scenario, I think of the pros and cons of the whole idea. If you were to have a lousy father, you wouldn’t have that solid man-figure who’d be fearless when the going gets tough to look up to, and that can really eat out of a child or a teen; however old the victim is. Then on the other hand, a child without a father (particularly a male) would be lost in this world, and he wouldn’t have that significant person to talk to and to relate; a person that he’d trust to the very end when others see it differently. Though in the long run, the victim of that situation should get help if it’s really taking a toll on them physically and mentally.In short, as for my opinion, I say that it’s better to lousy father. You would know that either he’d mistreat you, or that he’s a lazy dead-beat with no job that sleeps in all day, but if the child can use their initiative and some good common sense, then they’d see the wrong path to choose while maturing instead of following their dad’s footsteps. Seeing the negative at times can make out positive in the end, because you don’t want to have to walk the lonely road of life in shame and darkness.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I rather have a lousy father than not have one at all, because a father is one of the most wonderful things it could happen to you. At least a lousy father would be there when you need someone. You can count on your father on anything. and i guess lousy fathers are like that because they love their child, and they want their son or doughter to be as perfect as posible.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think it is better to have a lousy father because if you are fatherless you would be wanting to know who your father is. It would hurt me to not know who my father is. I think that as long as your father provides food for you and your family, that shows that he cares for you. I have a father who drinks and when he is drunk that is when he is a lousy father. He chooses his friends before his own family when he is drunk. But when he is not drunk he is a good father. When he is sober he is a good father he does act as a good father. I think that alchohol makes him a lousy father.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

There is scientific evidence that shows having a mother and a father is the healthiest way for a child to progress physically and mentally. So a lousy father is better than none.(that is of course assuming that he is not abusive in any way)Also, people change. Who says that he will be lousy forever. There are family therapy sessions you can attend to help.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

The shark on Finding Nemo obviously had issues. I mean come on people he never even knew his FATHER!Just trying to lighten things up, this is a depressing topic.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I believe its better to have a lousy father than to be fatherless. I myself know what's its like to not have a father, so to me it would be better to have a lousy father than no father at all. For some people, to have a lousy father is like having no father. But in reality you don't really know how good your father is or how good you really have it until he is gone and never coming back.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think its better to have a lousy father than no father at all. Having a lousy dad means having that second parent in your life that you can tell things to that you may not be able to tell your mom. If you have no father you never get the chance to know who your dad really was or what he was like or even what you had in common with him. A lousy dad may not be the best kind of dad but he's your dad and will love you no matter what. Even if you really don't like him at times, he's your family and you should be thankful for the people that are in your life, especially family.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

It is better to have a lousy father than to be fatherless because you will have someone there to learn mistakes from and to give you motivation to do better. You’ll never have that question in your mind of what it would’ve been like to have a father.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I rather have a lousy father then not have a father at all. Having a lousy father you have a father that cares for you and loves you. You can fix if he's lousy you can talk to him and knock some sense into him. I think it would hurt me not knowing who my father is and would want to know who he is. As long as you have a second parent that you can talk to when you can't talk to your mom about. I don't know how it would be if it was only my mom raising me.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think is better to have a lousy father than a fatherless because you can count on your father. No matter what your father is always going to be there for you in the good and bad times. If you don't have a father you don't really know what is right or wrong. If you don't have a father than you don't have nobody to count with or tell him your problems.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

It's better to have a lousy father for practical reasons. You can blame every mistake you've made on your father. He won't pry into your business and search your room and take your stuff because he doesnt think I need it. He wouldnt care so much that he would get pissed and throw my backpack with my computer in it at a wall putting a hole in it because I didn't clean the sink after breakfast or I forgot my keys. I think it's actually an opinion because that kind of father is still lousy because he'll tell you that he hates you and I ruined his life.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

A lousy father would be able to teach you more than no one at all. Maybe he will be able to teach what not to be like, how not to act, how not to treat your family. That is better than no teaching at all I think. He could toughen you up. Also you will at least know who he was and never wonder if your father was a saint or lousy, you already know.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think its better to have a lousy father than no father at all. Fathers have a key role in a child's life. Some people are raised without a father, but it is important to have one. To me i think a father brings discipline and understanding in a child's life. A lousy father can teach a child many lessons even if the are constantly doing wrong. A mother is for nurturing and love there for you when no one else is. A mother really can't take the role that a father would in a child's life no matter how hard. If there wasn't a dad i don't think there are going to be many boundaries in that child's life than if there was a "lousy" father..
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think that it is better to have a father who is lousy because I consider my father on a low level of lousy, and I think that I'm doing just fine. I just think thats it better to know that you have a father. I think that not knowing him, or what he looks like would ( to me ) be a insecure topic in my life. So, in my opinion. Just to know he exist would be better to me.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think that it will be better to have an lousy father than no father. A least you have an father. You know who he is and where he is. You will also kinda get an idea on what you going to be when you go up. If he is an lousy father, that will help you not be what he is. You can say that it is motivation that will help you became an better father. Because you don't want to be like your father. You want to better that your father, in-fact that should motivate you to be the greatest father you can be.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I try to see things in both ways, but even though sometimes Ill rather have a fatherless father I think having a lousy father would be better for me because in order to grow up and be ready for life you have to learn about life and if you do not have an image or person to look up life could become harder or not good.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I believe that most people look up at their peers and those being their fathers. In my opinion, I think that it doesn’t matter that you are fatherless or have a lousy father. For the most part if you have a lousy father it kind of like not having a father. In some occasions having a lousy father can be ok because you might not feel as lonely or have no one to talk to. Sometimes having a lousy father can help you throughout your life, even if he is strict or you have problems with him. I think that people that grow up without a father grow up missing a big part of their lives. In the end either way it all depends on how you take it and what you decide to do later on.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

In my opinion I think its better to have a lousy father than to be fatherless because when you are raised by your mother in most of the cases you start seeing how your mom struggle in order to pay bills, house rent, food, clothes, and then thats when you start hustling in order to bring some money to the house. In the other hand if you have a father you dont have to worry a lot about those things.That everytime that you come home you know that there would be your father waiting for you ready to listen to your problems or to talk about how was your day or anyting else.In other words you would have a role model.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I would have to choose a lousy father. I think having a father figure around even though he might not do much for you or the family is better than none. A father to me plays a huge role in a childs life he keeps thing stable throughout your childhood. My father is pretty lousy but he does support me and helps out sometimes I would rather have a father than none.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

To my knowledge people are able to change and make themselves better people. I would much rather have the hope that my father could be a good father, than know that I will never meet him. I would be too curious as to what kind of father he could of been.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I feel like it's better to have a lousy father than to not have one at all. If someone is bad at something, it means that there's always a possibility that one day they may be good at it. To be fatherless, there's not even a chance of having a good father. So to have a lousy father would be better.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I say lousy, if by lousy you mean unemployed, distant, detached, overworked, unavailable, lazy, unintelligent, boring, uneducated, and other non-criminal versions of a bad dad. However, if pops is a drug dealer, murderer, rapist, etc... Be satisfied with being alive and not knowing the sperm donor.
Debate: Is it better to have a lousy father or to be fatherless?
Side: Lousy Father

I think that its better to be have a father that is lousy then to not have a father at all. With out a father you would always be asking I wonder what would it would be like if I had a father. I think that the biggest hurt you can have is from someone not being there at all. All do you have one but his kind of lousy you now that he still cares about you because he was their for you when your growing up and not just left you as a bastard child. For my experience I really cant pick a side because i have a father but my father is not lousy. My father is the best all do he dint grow up with his father when he was a little kid that dint stop him from becoming a great father that he is right now.