Debate: The Practicality of "The Wall"
Side: Yes, because...

Some have brought up the idea of tit for tat.Its possibly racial to focus on a border for the South and not consider the same for the Canadian borderEven Huffington post, that in my opinion is left biased, says:"U.S. Border Patrol agents apprehended about 3,300 people along the northern border in fiscal year 2014, compared with about 480,000 people on the southwest border and about 3,900 people on the coastal border.DHS created its first northern border strategy in 2012, which is focused on information-sharing with Canada and risk-based assessments for how to use resources.The government operates unmanned aerial drones along the border and uses sensors to catch illegal activity, in addition to working with Canada to detect threats.DHS created its first northern border strategy in 2012, which is focused on information-sharing with Canada and risk-based assessments for how to use resources. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/scott-walkers-canadian-wall-idea-is-absurd-solution-to-a-real-problem  us55e491a6e4b0b7a96339c216The northern border is nearly 4,000 miles of often wide-open space that differs from the southern border as much as a jungle differs from an ice floe. It’s a region stretching from the Pacific to the Atlantic oceans, touching 13 states (not including Alaska), 12 national parks and forests, four Indian reservations, 18 international bridges and four of the five Great Lakes. The border is demarcated by thousands of small monuments established and maintained by a binational commission."Similarly, the enforcement picture at the U.S.-Canada juncture bears only a passing resemblance to the way the Border Patrol operates down south. Because the physical landscape at the northern divide is rugged in many places, about 1,000 agents patrol it – compared to nearly 10,000 at the southern border.Many people see those numbers as evidence the northern border is poorly guarded – especially since it’s twice as long as the southern border, and that’s not including Alaska. But Giuliano said the opposite is true.Near Canada, geography works to the Border Patrol’s advantage, he said. There are some locations where the wilderness is virtually impassable. Those limitations mean the Border Patrol is able to do more with less."All you have to do is look at the north Cascades ... to realize I just don’t need people standing shoulder-to-shoulder watching that border," Giuliano said.Also the environmental impact would be catastrophic due to the mountainess, wilderness and especially the 4 out of 5 Great Lakes.And the annual percipitation and snow fall combined with ice and thaw.A wall crossing that area would create environmental changes that would likely create natural disasters across that terain.Damaging communities by floods, from a wall blocking waterflow and absorption that occurs naturally in that area.The Great Lakes could become vicious instead of beautiful!And would also disrupt the natural flow of wildlife.Possibly even pushing unwelcome predatory animals toward human populations into US towns and Canadian porovinces.And we can see by the reports I have quoted an attached, it is not an applicable solution on the Canadiam Border. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/scott-walkers-canadian-wall-idea-is-absurd-solution-to-a-real-problem  us55e491a6e4b0b7a96339c216http://lang.sbsun.com/socal/beyondborders/part  4/p4day1_canada.asp