Debate: Is Jesus God ?
Side: No, Jesus is not a God.

As it appear this online debate relies on a point system, which makes the reality of the answers coming from both camps useless since it is dependent to the number of participants of the two groups. one wins if many is of his ideals but even though, as a philosopher, I will stand by my belief that Jesus is not a God.  Since this is not the first debate that I have come to witness about this topic I would create statements independent of the arguments presented by those of my same belief and this have come to my evaluation, I would present my two contentions:  That the evidences presented are third hand or here says and is a subject to proof of authenticity, such that what proof can one give that that tomb was really empty, what proofs can one give that the witnesses have not fabricated the stories, and what proof can one give that this miracles have really happened, all the evidences seems to have existed in numbers but the problem is the evidences are also subject for evidence, just like a tree having roots connected to a more complex pattern of another sets of roots, Proving Jesus, the primary, requires evidences, roots, it also requires evidences, which makes it more complex and all of them approached history that no one can unfold, in other words all of this evidences are one in essence, and asserting truth requires cross examination of the said witnesses in a proper interrogation, but nothing of such kind can be done, it means that one, in this case, should be agnostic or uncertain, however if one is to present evidences such as this then it supports reality and if the evidences presented are vague and not capable of being examined then one's position hangs on a slim thread and if that is cut none is to be the basis for such case. Suppose that a group of people claim to have witness Virgin Mary and has blessed a particular body of water in that area, saying that those who drink from it regardless of his moral standing will go to heaven and all who have said to witnessed it died instantaneously the next few weeks after, is one to believe immediately? of course no, one is to examine the evidences, even those of the opposing side would be doubtful about its claims since it is established to nothing but here says and its desired effect of cleansing is far from reach, anyone can say that. All evidences which is said to support the claims are writings of a poetic expressionism of a writer thus none of you can unlock the real meaning of the author's mind when he was writing it, notice that all biblical analogy has its own way of interpretation. The second contention is that, as a philosopher I have noticed the grievances in all philosophical schools, if all ideas claim to be correct then all of them are wrong. A thinker may ask is my Philosophy correct if it is somehow opposite to that of the others? to solve this I propose that all schools of thought are focused on different incompatible matters such that Idealism and Nihilism would be, both of them are focused to different area but at some point other or this mentioned ideas won't escape that it is really contradictory to each other to solve this, all ideas may be correct at some point but not completely so that its weakness should be a place for the establishment of the common ground to the other, one should find it to make a stronger idea out two schools that are otherwise distinct, in this case I am sewing commonality in all religions stating that they are personal thus cannot be proven wrong nor considered correct for it is ones way of knowing his God personally, but to assert that Jesus is God removes freedom to choose a belief since all that is left is to accept and follow that particular religion which holds the divinity of this being.