Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Im ignoring your sources as they aren't with your argumentsMy sources show precisely how India was exploited by Great Britain, did you even bother to read them? You may ignore them all you like but as for myself and anyone else on this site, we know that India was exploited by your country. Your denial changes nothing.of your President Wilson's 14 points i shall quote the lastAnd your country is incapable of voicing it's own opinion?Anyone who isn't richSo only rich people are important in your eyes?You leave us to fend for ourselves against the majority of Europe, which Nazi-Germany and his allies conquered, but when it comes to a country smaller than yours you need our help.You were not fighting "most of europe" you were fighting Nazi Germany, and you had the help of the Russians, which easily outnumbered the Germans. And if you recall, we did help you. Where this delusion that we "didn't help you" comes from, I cannot say, but you incessantly repeating it makes it no less false.You did not help us fight Japan. Which makes you a hypocrite.The might of a country does not come from the size of it's borders.I answered your question with another question.No you didn't. I asked you what made you think that The Japanese were planning to surrender and your response was "what makes you think it's okay to bomb innocent people", which in no way answers my question.There was an attempted coup after Emperor accepted surrender, his decision was pretty unpopular even after TWO nuclear weapons leveled two Japanese cities.I SIDE-TRACK DEBATE! thats rich (sarcasm by the way), whenever you make a point which i can't argue against I admit I was wrong whereas you just blankout all the evidence which you know is true and pick at the 1 little sentance which you can find fault with.I appreciate the fact that you admit when you know you're wrong, but when exactly have I "Blankout all the evidence"?I was wrong then but you have to go back over 600 years to find a war that we lost at a time when England wasn't at the level of unity that it is at now.You must have strong resolution to have been wrong so many times in this debate and to continue on.No, you will find that this was not your most recent military failure. You're forgetting the second and third Anglo-dutch wars and of course the American Revolutionary war.I think that its a cunning strategic plan, have you seen how fast China's economy explodes when you leave it on its own. I will discuss "morals" at the endYes, but you did not mention how immoral it is to intentionally addict a populace of a foreign country to opium which you are importing into the country illegally. World Trade Centre- lack of safety precautionsI won't dispute that, but it doesn't change the fact that your nation has plenty of it's own failures to boast....as does nearly every nation on earth.It's called Democracy, first you complain that drug smugglings "moral failure" but when we liberate countries thats sill a fail? make up your mindThey wouldn't need to be liberated in the first place, if not for the oppression suffered under English rule.The sentance I said was clearly about abortion and did not have the word "condoms" in it.As to why I said "It had little to do with condoms". What does abortion have to do with condoms? If anything condoms reduce the cause of abortions, unwanted pregnancies.Consequences for everythingConsequences for unprotected sex, and yet you are opposed to means which can reduce disease, unwanted pregnancies and therefore abortions.Your position is one of irrationality.I don't give a damn about what you can do, this is about your country and mine.Okay, but it does no good to complain about what is an effect of the free market. Do you propose a solution?Pornography isn't ok because it goes against nearly all religions andis against nearly all traditional morals. For you to create a form of world communication"internet" and then use it for pornography is just insulting.{Laughs}Maybe you forgot who I am. It makes no difference whatsoever what "religious" traditions or morals say, when religion is the manifestation of man's irrationality. Religious tradition also taught man that the sun revolves around the earth and anybody who dared say otherwise was a heretic.likewise any moral tradition not based on fact and reason, is worthless.There are many men who have never felt, or never will feel a woman's touch, for them depictions of sex (on print or screen) is as close as they will ever get and this brings them solace. Who are you to deny them that?