azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

All good points,I actually don't even know what kind of animals they test, I do think it is mostly rats though,And oddly pigs innards most closely resemble our own I've heard (irony anyone?)I don't know that anyone tests dogs and cats outsided of for the benefit of dogs and cats. Least not hear. We actually didn't evolve from monkeys at all, or chimps, or banobos or any other of the primates we most closely resemble, that's just the closest common link. Some millions of years ago there was a group of primates that were separated, some turned into us after millions of years, some turned into other monkey-like creatures. So not so much ancestors, as distant distant cousins.But at the end of the day, I'd rather put a chimp in a test flight for a new craft that may or may not blow up.Unfair? yes, but we have to draw the line somewhere, and a rat I don't think would give us the needed info.Hopefully though sometime very soon, we'll be able to move beyond any testing on any living thing, and technology will be able to simulate well enough, and we'll have robots to do the leg work.
Debate: animal testing
Side: It depends

Why just dogs and cats?
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

I think I meant that they are the most likely to be euthanized and if they must be, use them in addition to other creatures.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

The majority of testing is on rats and similar animals that are bred very quickly to become more susceptible to the diseases that the scientists are trying to cure. The rat is the perfect animal for this because they reproduce quickly and numerously and are cheap to care for.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

I dont think any animal should be tested on they have emotions and can feel pain too!! Imagine your an animal in a science lab. You have have people that are bigger, scarier, more powerful than you rubbing stuff on your skin that burns and makes your insides feel as if there broiling. Then they take something and put it on your eyes suddenly your eyes start burning, you try to get it off but the big people hold down your paws, your eyes start to get narrow visioned and suddenly everythings goes black and the burning stops, you cant see because you have gone blind. This may be nothing like they feel like because im sure it is much more graphic and horrible than that, But definetly nothing less than that.“Animals are more than ever a test of our character, of mankind's capacity for empathy and for decent, honorable conduct and faithful stewardship. We are called to treat them with kindness, not because they have rights or power or some claim to total equality, but in a sense because they don't; because they all stand unequal and powerless before us unable to do anything."So please lets stand up against Animal Testing!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

it is the worst thing in the world. how would you feel if people started testing on people then what would you say top that
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

i agree ........................................... yeah i thought the same thing okie dokie
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Plus you dont have to use animals for testing, there are alternatives like computer programs that use Serum, DNA and other stuff to predict what the out come of the product is.There is also something called Human Testing, but it is not on acuall humans it is on human cells, so no one is hurt and they can see how the human would react from it.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Thanks for the idea but DNA cannot get the accurate result in terms of getting a replica of human "'being" sad to say we need to value human lives before another species.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

It is not only immoral but highly hypocritical and inaccurate.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Immoral, Hypocritical , inaccurate for saving human lives ? That's a good reason
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Animal testing is wrong because they can't say no to it. I wouldn't want to be tested on if I was forced too.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

I am against cruelty to animals. I don't want to see animals being tested on and suffering the consequences of pain.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Animal testing for medicine is needed! Would want us all to die just because some hippies don't want animals dead!?
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Never harm animals!!!!! Animals never harmed us,why harm them?Animals are lives too;)
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Sure , but no more fried chicken okay ?
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

People think what are you saying that animals are less important than you like think animals being used for testing mostly half of the time end up dying there using sometimes chemicals inside of dogs for you animals are not for the rights to be used for all that its just them trying illegal things on animals to give to you selfish people dogs are risking there life for you think of you being strangled or maybe you being threatened you have no way out to try and save yourself scientist need to make a machine that will test chemicals or clothing or anything don't harm our animals with you illegal or life threatening chemicals or clothing
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Sure , we can make machine in the future but for now, we'll kill animals.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

When I'm learning, I find that the internet generally provides me with a good broad-brush overview of a topic, but is usually incapable of helping me dig deeply into a particular topic.A book demands patience and effort, but rewards me with the depth that can only come from careful and intensive study and reflection.If I had to choose between books and the internet, there would be no contest. I'll take my books.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Hi. I am a student from school and my task is to write a discussion about whether computers are better than books. What should my arguments be.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: computers

Computers are the besttttttttt play games people---------
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Neither is better as without a human teacher and some decent advice your not going to learn anything. Technically books are more able as you need no power to read them and most are supervised works. A computer allows any idiot to post anything and call it fact. Plus computers have quite a bit of problems on their own. virii, crashes, etc.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

most people say that computers are better for learning because they have more options as to what you can do with them versus an ordinary text book. but what about the children who dont have access to a computer at home? sure computers are a great technological advance, but can they really out-do a normal text book? computers can be difficult to understand and even more difficult to use. they can be broken and fail resulting in information loss. books are much simpler because all you have to do is turn a page. im not saying computers are bad by any means, im simply stating that for educational purposes, books may have the upper hand due to thier reliability.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

the computer teaches us all that we don't need to look for information we can just google it. It is another device that makes us all lazy and stupid.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

I agree with you, technology is making humans more lazy, and lack the desire to go to the library and find a book.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: computers

We must be lazy, that's why you are on a computer right? If you love books so much then just go read one and get off the computer.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

also you will get information of the topics you are searching for and of topics related to the subject. so it will enhance a persons knowledge of other things as well.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

books are the best source of learning. although a person will have to go through a number of books to get the right material, he won't return empty-handed. he will have gained enough knowledge by reading so many things. while on the computer a person will only get information on a specific topic. so computers should only be used when in real hurry. it does help a little when you need knowledge only in one topic.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

agreed the best source of learning are books, and that computers only help on only one topic
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

computers contain some lies and some truths, while books contain full truths
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

There are bad books aswell. Don't take them all as a good thing. I have bought two technical books once that were the most pretentious things I've ever seen, from which I have learned nothing else than what I had learned by myself already. I still wander why I didn't go back to the store for a refund...But distinguishing a good book from a bad book, however, is much easier than distinguishing good internet content from bad internet content.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: computers

Fiction books XD that is how somebody from the internet easily out-goes you.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

any morons can come and post anything in computers, and may be fact
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

computers are fun to play, but is very rarely known for studying
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

The Internet can be misrepresenting and incomplete in many teachings. Most of what you learn on it is gathered from tidbits here and there, and once in a while someone is going to contradict someone, and you'll be left with a hole in your theory. Of course, this can happen in books, but in books you can differentiate easily the pretentious ones from the worthwhile. A pretentious book is usually thin and not often the cheapest, while the book that was made with hard research and revising is usually thick, and doesn't always cost much more than the thin one. But the experienced author made a better job and a greater effort at teaching the matter. I believe some authors will - due to the dedication needed to create a book that will actually be approved for publishing, and to make it sell well - try to, at least, give their best shot at making it worthy. Usualy, a good book is made by at least one serious minded proffessional.On the Internet, the great majority of what you read is made by amateurs or enthusiasts. Creating this is easy and fast, and because it's free most people don't really tend to make sure it is 100% accurate or efficient. There's no danger of economic investment gone wrong. They don't need to sell one text page to have funds to make more pages of text. There are of course, and thankfully, some professionals, or very experienced people, that do share their knowledge, but they still may neglect certain key aspects of teaching it (intentionaly or not). But usualy an internet tutorial is made by a hobbyist, or a professional with some free time to play around.That said, I can give you my personal example. I've tried both ways along my years of self-teaching 3D Modeling, Photoshoping, programming, and a few other things (which is what I hope to be doing to pay the bills someday), and it was only in books where I really learned with greater consistency.The best example in my personally experience is actually in programming. I've spent so much time (3 or 4 years) learning from here and there on the Internet, always being unable to get my projects done for some reason or another. One day my neighbor (a computers technician) borrowed me a book, I studied it, and I was amazed at how many things I have neglected to learn (or they neglected to teach). And I've never needed any other book, nor the Internet (for that specific programming language).Furthermore, if you tend to use the wikipedia a lot, I won't blame you. For the most part it seems ok. But sometimes, if you take a look at the discussions page you'll see how inconsistent some pages may be. Careful with that.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Firstly, I'm for booksWhy FOR books: First of all, firstly appeared books. and we can not live without them.  For some people it is really hard reading from screen of computer. Also, while reading book, you wouldn't be interrupted by advertisement, some bright icons which given in computer during your reading. you are concentrated on this book and nothing more. as a result you will have better achievements. Reading of books has less influence on our health, especially for our eyes. You can even "tick" some moments in your book, which will e very easy for you to find important information.P.S. of course technological progress is excellent, but please, don't forget about books... from the age of Enlightenment books went along us everywhere...
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Yes, I do agree that internet is more conventional to use and there are millions of information we can get from it, but then...we are not sure if all these information was given by the educated and EXPERT people. I say this because, this morning I've gone to the library and I read a book about INTERNET that says..." A webpage is very easy to make. You can say all the things inside your mind,your opinions and insights about a certain topic that you want to talk about."When I read this statement...the idea that comes inside my mind is..."So it is true that SOME information that we can get from the internet are just opinions".
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

I agree with all argument above. and also want to add, that it's more comfortable and interesting read bools, then text in computer, moreover our eyes. because of computers we could lost our perfect vision
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Again I am Claudius, and this is my reply: You can not say that the reply of the internet to your question is SPECIFIC! May I ask you all. When you type a certain question or a word that you want to learn more about, does the internet gives you ONLY ONE ANSWER that provides you the complete and accurate information that you are expecting to receive? That is my question. The word "SPECIFIC" it means "it gives information that is precise and exact".
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

For Detailed study books are the best and for short or just overview Computer is best. Depends on your requirement.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

I love having textbooks to read instead of using the internet or technology! On the internet i could spend hours looking for one piece of information and find dozens of sites that contain the same thing but not what I'm looking for. With textbooks you get everything you need and want and it is creditable! You know who the author is and that the information is true when on the internet you never really know where the information is coming from.I love books! Would rather read a book then use technology any day!
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

books tell more than computers do some novels are not found on computers and some are incomplete
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

i'm supporting booksif you say Internet and computers are more informative than why do we need teachers to teach us .... ?????????? why do you use textbook in schools and colleges [ few colleges ] and also you think Internet is easy for assisting information without analyzing that you are becoming lazy day by day ... , and also usage of Internet you need to pay for it but whereas for books you need not...you think Internet is easy for your sake but you are not thinking of the poor guys and gals who wouldn't be able to use systems and this is also called as selfishness.. i know that everyone writes personal dairy , if you say internet is best why do you want to write in a dairy , you can directly post in internet or save in your system right????
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

I support Homama something arather about the debate of books are better than computers.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Books are way better. They have way more specific and relevant information and are easier to control because computers can have technology failured.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

they are still good after 500 years while you need to update computers after 2 or 3 weeks with the newest WordDocument or other junk like that and books can survive being thrown out a window and run over by a car while conmputers cant
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Homaha3 you are a weird dummy who spams for no reason. you put two good reasons but you still spam >:(
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

you can think for yourself with books you can also imagine what it would be like.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

books are better much better than computers who agrees? everyone
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Do you really expect some one to learn anything when there is a distracting light? Being on-line is like living above a bar on a Friday night at 12:45 There is plenty of noise and lots of action, but not much being learned that one can remember.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

books are cool. jfsdnfjskfnjskfnsfadgnjnfjsfjsbfsfkjsfjasfkaskl
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Books makes you a man .It is through books Charles Babbage found the way to the computer world.Computer allows access to inappropriate sites ,especially to the kiddies............
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

I am deeply convinced that there is nothing better than book (abc-book, textbook, directory, encyclopedia, literature and though brochure! Scientific magazines, codes, dictionaries, my God, the head around from attempt to clasp non-covered things like books). Yes, computer is much more convenient, in it there are more functions and there are advantages like unlimited access to everything. But in these advantages covered, in my opinion, it's main and non-corrected shortcoming also! 1. Convenience. In computer it is possible to see information only which you need right now, passing "unnecessary" or "uninteresting". To use search in words, in key phrases. In the book it will be necessary to study carefully each page to receive the required data. But it after all is plus! Instead of receiving superficial knowledge (which are worse that eve knowing nothing, I think), you learn reasons, a prehistory, interesting facts, your horizons will be broadened, and mind becomes more flexible. Even if you think, what it is not useful to you - who knows? You, eventually, will learn search and reading "on a diagonal" itself, without resorting to the help of programs or special means. You will have skills like quick reading also.2. Functions. I do not argue, of course computer - not simply book, it is the whole library, free, available, in step proximity... But near this library, figuratively speaking, there is the whole amusement park. Being the student, I perfectly represent as it is easy to distract, working at the computer. You will not manage to look back, and yeah - you play the second hour in WoT instead of writing the final essay. So multifunctionality of the computer not so continuous pleasure or absolute plus.3. Unlimited access. I would not want to hear that Father Frost does not exist from any Internet user =) Or to see still something, excessively cruel or cynical, to read any forbidden book. After all any sources are forbidden, isn't it? Forbidden not just because of someone's minute desire. Though it is a disputed issue, but I think so. 4 . Well, and the last. How it is possible to prefer to the book, the friend, this callous, non-soul piece of iron? The book smells as typographical paint, rustles with pages, with it it is possible to lie on a sofa, to walk with a dog and eat in cafe. Book almost live. And computer, well, is computer. Perhaps I think like old or stereotipical person, but it's pleasantly to be engaged according to the book. And what is helped more for educational process than sincere desire to study and learn something new?
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

Books can't get hacked by other people. Also you usually don't have to update books but the dictionary. Books don't crash if something goes wrong. what if you want to know about b.c times and the internet doesn't have it.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

books are lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lo lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol and awesome awesome awesome and cool cool cool and you create a movie in ur head and books rock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

love books coz they r 0-0 n computers r bad 4 ur iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii n they rox
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

I strongly believe books are the best means to study by. Sure the internet might have a lot of information out there, but, you can never be really sure that what you read online is actually true. I LOVE books and whenever I had to study for something, I went straight to the bookshelves. I believe those who study by books, or just read lots of book in general, have better vocabularies and even greater intelligence. And to add to that, Those who study by computer are just lazy. Lazy people don't get good grades. Just Saying.
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

computers crash and need 2 b updated and r really 0-0 and lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

i love books and read them all the time and thats why i am a grade 10 speller in year 6 and books create a fantastic image in your mind and dont give you a headache
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

To be fair I love to sit down and read a good book but then there is learning and of course schools I mean don't you just hate all the heavy books!
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

....we can read but why we don't use it?...were just keep on RESEARCHING???...just copy paste then DONE!!..in very beginning our mom using books to tell us some story...in the pre-school were using books to learn more how to read..but now???...the BOOks is just in your room..cabinet..librarywhy we need to keep on searching if know that BOOk is more important and more better than YOUR GADGETS!?come on!!..Books are very important in everyday life because they are a primary source of information which gives a historical or present insight into the period in which it was produced. The life of a good book is known to be far longer than that of a man....what can you say????BOOKS is more IMPORTANT!!
Debate: Are books or computers better for learning?
Side: Books

books are better than computers :)