Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

"How is this a rebuttal?"Okay i'll explain in simpler words for you.first you say"Your logic of the origin of the universe is that nothing created something. Which we know by various laws of science is not the case for instance the law of cause and effect (all causes trace back to a first cause)."The you say"God has no creator, He is eternal. You can't apply the natural sciences to the supernatural."That is a logical fallacy of self exclusion, it is almost childish that you even made that fallacy."Can you prove He doesn't exist? Didn't think so."I have presented you with logical arguments, yet you refuse to even consider them and just tell me stories from a book, which has been conveniently re-written multiple times, meanings of things have changed multiple times. I mean seriously i wonder if you live in a bubble or something. At this point im actually feeling bad for you, for you don't know what it is like to experience freedom."You have yet to make an intelligent remark." just telling you, you aren't making any real points, while my cuzin has used mathematics and studies in logic to make some plausible arguments."So are you denying the historical fact of the crimes these regimes committed? If so you might want monitor what you say for fear of confirming your lack of brain power to function as a sea sponge."Nope i am not denying it, did you seem me say "oh that didn't happen??"."The books were written by the next generation and secretaries of the Apostles. And He is risen not dead, you will have to find His body to prove otherwise."This is exactly why i feel like you have the IQ of a peanut, There is no body that doesn't mean he is risen you fool, it means he was never there to begin with. And its just a fairy tale."How is this a rebuttal with no statement to contradict me? Maybe you should just limit yourself to Twitter, since you are speaking from opinion not verifiable statements."Again, i already proved the bible is a fairytale, but you just can't accept it. Just because over 2 billion people read it doesn't make it true. You see any religion based on harry potter? "When did we speak of this? You are bringing up the actions of men, not the word of God."Again, you fail to understand simple things im implying. A God should stop these actions, a God should protect the victims. And not worry about the "sin" because in the end you say he loves everyone, but he lets them go through these brutal events and experience so much suffering and for what? to test there faith? If that is the case then God can easily be confused with the Devil."Is that why you don't wear a shirt, and shave your chest? I could see why you would reject such an obvious homosexual religion." I don't see why this remark is needed but hey w/e helps you feel secure about your religion. And what i do and don't do with my body is only my concern. "No, by definition you have to deny God to be an atheist. So therefore you would deny any evidence of His existence. That is not reasonable."Lol clearly you don't understand atheists. We deny God because we have yet to see any evidence of his/her existence. And Again i feel like a broken record and i don't know why you can't get this through your head but, BIBLE IS NOT A SOURCE THATS PROVES ANYTHING, IT CAN'T BE USED TO SUPPORT ANY ARGUMENT. IT IS MERELY A STORY BOOK."Alone a sperm has no potential for life. I already said this to you." That was a typo sperm & egg* have the probability to meet"Those cells have the ability to be a human life. When conception occurs you must give life a chance. It is murder to cease that life."It is not a life until it can process some thought, can be aware of it's surroundings, or at least until it has the shape similar to a human From that point i agree its murder, But before that it is nothing but a blob of cells."You have not supported any of your conjecture. You are merely stating your opinion.If sperm could make a life on it's own, then you would have babies crawling all over you chin."SEE aboveALSO I find it very interesting that you didn't even acknowladge my source that i provided i will paste it again http://www.google.com/search?q=Religious+wats&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en#q=Religious+wars&hl=en&prmd;=ivnsub&tbs=tl:1&tbo=u&ei=5JgtTZylPI-t8AaHm8XNCQ&sa=X&oi=timeline_result&ct=title&resnum=14&ved=0CJQBEOcCMA0&fp=a20cfd04ba3c5cf9 I hope your eyes don't miss it. but again you seem like you are blinded so lets see what happens.EDIT-I see that link is directing to the search result but not the link im trying to jump at, so im gonna write down this processSearch on google -> "Religious Wars"Scroll down and you will see, "Timeline results of religious wars" that has 2000 years of history of religious wars.EDIT"Is a 58 percent chance that an atheist leader will murder a noticeable percentage of the population over which he rules sufficient evidence that atheism does, in fact, provide a systematic influence to do bad things? If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation committed by Christians, even though atheists have had less than one-twentieth the number of opportunities with which to commit them. If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large-scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case. Once might be an accident, even twice could be coincidence, but fifty-two incidents in ninety years reeks of causation!""That sir is a groundless statement, yes Stalin murdered. But thats the only guy you in the history who was an atheist and a ruler who murdered.Rest Are Part of a religion and murdered in the name of a religion, many including your religion and many other religions.