azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

"Homosexuality is not natural"This is the most preposterous item I've heard in years. Are you ignorant to what is natural and not?!Acceptance vs taboo If you know anything about animal and human sexuality you would properly acknowledge that homosexuality has been around since the existence of sexuality. Animals display it on a daily routine. Alexander the Great, one of the most powerful men in ancient history, had many homosexual tendencies. (even on a more intense level of pedophilia) As an evolving society, homosexuality was bound to get to the point it has today. Let me also add that if you knew anything about the adoption procedure and the psychological harm that those who go through adoption have to deal with, it would pale to comparison to the teasing they would go through in their schooling.My point is that on items of sexuality it is not all monkey see monkey do. I have so many points and so little time. I'm very happy to see the down votes. (means I'm getting to you people!)As for your opinion, I'm not here to change it. I'm just here to point out all the fallacies in your argument.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

If it was monkey see-monkey do, then how come there are many gay children coming out to their heterosexual parents?Its choices. Everyone has a right to their own choice. YOU have no right to strip someone from their choice solely for your own selflish beliefs. Someone's sexual orientation should not affect you and, if it does, then quit brown nosing because it is not any of your business.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

That's what i think too, homosexuality is freaking wrong and you deserve an up-vote ^^
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I'm wondering what part of,"The studies conclude that children of gay or lesbian parents are no different than their counterparts raised by heterosexual parents. In "Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents," a 1992 article in Child Development, Charlotte Patterson states, "Despite dire predictions about children based on well-known theories of psychosocial development, and despite the accumulation of a substantial body of research investigating these issues, not a single study has found children of gay or lesbian parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents," confuses you? Your argument against gays adopting appears to be completely speculative. Also, I'm wondering what kind of buddhism you practice.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

What kind of buddhism i practice is totally none of your buisness although i must thank you for inquiring about my religious heath.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I not only wonder what kind of Buddhism YOU practice after giving a very poor and disgusting diatribe on Christianity...I wonder most of all where you're getting all your Reward POINTS and UP VOTES from for only being here for 13 days and gone the last four? Can it be that Buddhists have multiple personalities which create multiple accounts? I have NEVER seen such utter hatred and blather so richly and constantly REWARDED on this site!
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Don't change the topic i am talking about the topic on christianity don't bring in points or buddhism.They are irrelevant and for your information i don't actually practice buddhism it's more like practicing noting :]Points ain't inportant for me, i don't have so much free time to spam and multiply my accounts so that i could earn more points and be the top of this place.Ah, that would be stupid ain't it :]And also i am not pointing how inferior chrisitanity is i am just trying to show the difference between buddhism and christianiy. Unless all of you are trying to show me that you don't get what i mean.And that you are ignorant oh perhaps we are in two different worlds with different perceptions.With different beliefs and different lifestles.I never get personal with anyone never unless he/she has been hostile to me like you :]hmm i am not actually a buddhist nor a christian nor a atheist.I am just ME !If you want to criticise, please criticise me instead because i am the master who practices buddhism or christianiy or atheism.If you wonder how bad i practice buddhism you got it right i just slack all day long as if i am an atheist.Buddhism is great but i am not, you are just blatantly scolding the wrong thing at the wrong time.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I believe you are the person who changed the topic when you gave your vulgar thoughts on Christianity and those who believe in it very strongly. As to your points, they are highly suspect. Oh, now you don't practice Buddhism? Earlier, you did. My, oh my, things happen very quickly in Oz.You were not showing the difference between the two belief systems, not at all. I do not believe you have the capacity to show them and present them in a mannerly and organized fashion. You are a "master" at nothing other than the smoke and mirror show.I've been here for a fair amount of time and know a bit about the way people up vote and down vote. Never take any of the regulars here for fools...for if you do, you'll fall into your own trap and be the worse for it. You mistake truth for hostility and that will dilute any Karma you have obtained, if any.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

Show me the difference between christianity and buddism in an orderly and organized fashion.This might take some time but nevertheless i do wish to see what kind of mannerly and orderly fashion you have in mind that you want to show.I don't mind mistaking the truth for hostiliity because clarity comes from chaos.I rather learn things the hard way and of course with reasoning and proper understanding, i would'nt believe in god that is omnipotent and thats it i need to know and understand more about it.Please do show me what your opinions are between these two religions.I don't mind them being vulgar but i just need them to be understandable.Whatever vulgar stuff there is i don't care and i can't stop you :]
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

I need show you nothing but what the topic is on this debate. Do you not comprehend what is mannerly and orderly? You have said some very despicable things about Christianity. It's up to you to research your remarks before you make them and it's not my job to educate you in such things. You're the person who needs to explain themselves not I.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

If i am not wrong you are the superhero who tried to intervene into this cannot be won debate and you tried to lure me to think that i had take the truth for hostillity for which i had not. you're the one who thinks so almighty of himself and still thinking of the land oZ oh thats so childish.If insulting people is ignorant and giving opinions is ignorant perhaps, insulting other people with names and not getting to the point is more ignorant.Perhaps the word 'ignorant' is an understatement to describe the idiocy of someone like you. I'm trying to express some of my personal opinions on christianity and i do not intend to post it all over createdebate to let everyone regular or not to know my opinion.It's called Freedom of Speech, freedom to express one owns opinion unless you're against it.Your job is not to educate me in such things, your job is to just keep your mouth zipped up or at least voice out some opinions.And bloody hell not to condemn me while i am trying to type out my opinion here.At least my post ain't reduced to MERE name calling unlike someone who came here just to critizicise me for saying despicable things about christianity.You are evidently trying to take the 'Freedom of Speech' away from me and i can sue you for it.And i did not personally attack christians that christianity is fake.I am just pointing out this this and that that and thats it and i am not surprised i got some downvotes for voicing out my horrible opinions on that matter.and also i am not surprised you got some downvotes there too.Don't think of yourself as smart or regular there are new-comers who know more than you.how active you are on this site doesn't count, you need some common sense and an working mind. But i think you don't. For topic such as these there are always more than one side to the story and not yes gays should adopt fullstop. i appreciate those who reasnwered me to my post unlike you mis kuk.Wild and barbaric and do not get to the point.I'm a turd ?Yes i may be a turd in giving opinions but you ?For a matured person ?Thats ABSURD.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Blah, shit this you win :]. I don't have energy to quarrel with you kuk nor make you an enemyI wish there was a delete arguement function so i could delete my posts. :DGood Day
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Sorry to you and to all who have seen my rubbish and nonsensical posts about christianity and were offended by them. What you said made absolute sense to me and i apologize for what wrong i had done.Especially to those who had their efficiency dropped for no rhyme of any reason.I hope you could forigve me and let the past behind us.One more thing, i do live in Singapore and i have '524493' for my Zip-code and not 52449. I really wished i could add that '3' in to clear some misunderstandings but there is not enough space i guess. :]
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

Thank you Kroticfate for coming clean and admitting that what you did was wrong. I'll try and post that for you on the FATE or KROTICFATE debate since we're having computer problem on the site right now. I am proud you did this and I think others will give you the second chance you deserve, as I will. I will now gladly add you to my ally list for being courageous enough to tell us and make it right.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I just love frigging down votes don't you 50505050505050505050505050550?
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Sorry and thank you kuk for giving me a second chance :P, i appreciate it very much :]Good Day.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

You dun sound as if you is frum a reel dun edumuhcated civuhlization.Translation, wtf? Just because homosexuality isn't right for you, doesn't give you the right to judge others. Don't hate on people who are just trying too love one another. As long as no one is forcing you into anything, what should you care?
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

First of all, i grew up in a Christianity based home, i got taught that liking the same sex is wrong and not part of nature. That if God would be okay with this, we would all be men or all be be women. But what of I have learned is to be opened minded. Most people really don't don't understand Christians, because they believe in a greater power. You say if God see's ahead of everything then why did he create man, since he knew how we were going to become. He knew but God test man, to see if man is strong to follow whats right, in the Bible sense. So really it shouldn't matter what religion you are it only matters if you have the best intensest for man kind and not take advantage of that fact. If a gay man or women want a child they have all the right too. They have a right to just like us, they are human, we are all human. Remember this is America the land of the free, maybe not all the way free but to a certine point it is, that's why other from other countries come to America. By the way i rather worry about criminals on the street and to have them in jail than if gays can adopt!
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

What 'most' debate i saw about how homosexuality is morally accepted by people utterly shocked me to the core. I'm not sure what kind of world are you in but i certainly do not accept it as 'normal'because it is abnormal and going against natureIgnoring the fact that we actually do find many instances of homosexuality in the animal kingdom and thus nature....You're violating the naturalistic fallacy. You assume that something which is natural is inherently "good" and something not natural is "bad".If you can show me where in nature we find skyscrapers and microchips....that would be great! Because these things aren't exactly natural either. Yet something like cannibalism is actually pretty common in nature.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

Does anyone really think their family is absolutely normal?And what about all the children being raised by single moms and dads who've divorced, or never married? They're teased in school too.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I understand that people who are ignorant and uneducated may think that 'gayness' is contagious. Let me assure you, it isn't.During childhood, everyone is laughed at for something.No child will assume a man gave birth to them if the parents explain things the way all parents do. Did you assume your father gave birth to you until your mother said she did?It is alright if he is gay too. There is nothing wrong with being gay. Their is something wrong with judging people and telling children that their gay parents are sinners and are going to hell.There is something wrong with laughing at a child for having two parents who love them. Any orphan would gladly take two fathers or two mothers over no parents any day of the year.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

it's not about whether the parents are gay or straight, it's about how they raise their children, with truth or with lies, open minds or fear. both straight and gay parents are capable of both, their sexuality is irrelevant.during anyone's childhood others may laugh at them for random reasons. the child wouldn't mind having happy gay parents and getting laughed at by mindless kids as much as he/she might mind having a straight couple as parents if they gets divorced or have a drug addiction or are abusive.if a gay child grows up with straight parents, they don't fit in either. he might think he is straight. the mindset would stay with him for a long time, also. and that would be just as wrong as what you claimed.when teaching about reproduction gay parents would have to tell the child where babies come from and how they do so. being gay doesn't mean they will make up some story about how gay people can conceive. they could, but being gay doesn't mean they will. what about all the straight parents who tell their kids they come from cabbages?
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I'm pretty darn sure they would have long ago tell the kid he was adopted. And would you rather him face 'ridicule at a young age' or live in a shelter without a family at all.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

hell no gays should never be allowed to adopt a child the very ill behaved people they ruin things in this country let them go to eurpoe and live the choose there life style is real sick a guy on top of guy a discussing thing same as a woman kissing a woman is sick and noway way should a child be brought into that situation.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

"ill behaved people ruin things in this country"Yeah like those asses who are intolerant of other's existence when they have done absolutely nothing wrong but to live.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

good strategy - I hadn't thought of just picking the other side and making a stupid argument - way to help illuminate some of the ludicrous things people on the other side tend to say. hopefully that is what you are doing.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

A child needs a mother and a father figure. If two men adopt a girl how are they going to explain girl stuff.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

How does a single father explain "girl stuff?" That's just fine, but when it happens to be two men, it's not okay anymore. I don't see the difference here.For that matter, how does a single mother explain "boy stuff?" This situation is socially accepted, but essentially the same thing isn't when it's two of the same sex. As long as the kid's fine who really cares? Why is that?
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

I don't know if you have kids or where recently in school but the government is hiring people to get to the point long before the parents even want to think about it. Most straight parents don't even explain this stuff to their kids anymore either because they don't care or because they say one word and the kid says 'Yeah mom/dad I know. Remember that paper you signed last week giving the school permission to teach me that crap? Yeah please don't go there.'What about single parents? They do it by themselves and to be quite frank I would find it more akward as a single straight parent then a gay couple who don't find any atraction to that sex what so ever. So how bout you through that argument in a single parents face and see if you still have a face when they're done with you.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

What would you do if a gay couple adopted your brother? Or why not you? There are many people who aren't gay that are not allowed to adopt and they'd be good parents.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

Well, much of that argument is outside the scope of the debate. What would I do? Well, I, personally, wouldn't like it. But that doesn't mean it's wrong. That's where I think many people are missing the point. They aren't drawing the line between what they like and what is right.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

If it isn't wrong why don't you like it. Can you prove there is nothing wrong with it? Prove it!
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

First of all, calm down there, Bill...I don't like it because I myself am not gay, and I don't approve of the gay lifestyle. But I do think they should be able to do that if they want. It's a weird little part of me, I know, but that's just how I feel. I don't like it.I can't prove that there isn't anything wrong with it, but I can't prove it just as much as you can't. There is no way to prove it either way.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

HOW DO YOU KNOW MY NAME? Who are you? I guessing it is andrew!
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

You mean people like you?The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

Gay couples are just like straight couples. You tend to fully judge, what you don't fully understand.Gay parents get things done. Just like a modern straight couple might have a "Mr. Mom" who stays home, while the wife goes to work, doesn't mean that that couple wont be good parents.There are many untraditional families who make it work. Just because they don't have to body parts you find fit, doesn't mean they can't raise children.One father can take on the role of the mother. He can be feminine and caring, loving et cetera. These "roles" you place on parents are just an illusion.There is no one, right way to raise a child.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Gay couples are the same as staight couples?If this were true there would not be a debate!....Im just saying
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

Your just sayin? You as an authority on the subject?Of course they are not exactly the same, but the different we are trivial and or cosmetic. The core values of parenting can be preformed similarly by both kinds of parents.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Wow! Your right, I am not an authority. Just a parent as I am sure you either are or aspire to be judging by your passion..That was an attempt to show that it was meant to be a light hearted poke at the wording.But I am curious, why so intolerant? Why just jump right to the "authority" sarcasm? Well, as long as we are at it, and as a non-authority...I disagree for the block! The differences go way deeper than trivial or cosmetic.Women cannot pass masculinity to a male child. A boy cannot learn from a woman what it means to truly be a man just as two men cant teach a young woman what it means to become a real woman. Two women cant do any better raising a boy to be a man than a single mother can, and we all know what that has done to entire generations of young men. The damaging effects on children from the absence of a father in a family is well documented. When it comes to the matter of masculinity its just not possible. Its not that its wrong...its just not possible.Truly I am sorry. I didn't mean to step on toes. Just my non-authoritarian opinion.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

All homosexuals, male or female, who would adopt a child, are acting in a manner that is contrary to the nature and consequences of homosexuality. For by reason of their supposed natural, sexual orientation, as they call it, their actions negate the possibility of becoming progenitors as a consequence. Moreover, the homosexual nature also axiomatically negates the necessary and natural predisposition of progenitors as parents as well as negating the necessary and natural predisposition of progenitors to place their well-being as secondary and a child’s primary. However, before they have attempted to adopt a child, all homosexuals have already, in life, demonstrated the predispositional consequences of their sexual orientation which evidence the fact that they cannot put the well-being of anyone before their own subjective well-being. For don’t all homosexuals act contrary to the heterosexuality of their parents from which, as a consequence, they were born into this world? Moreover, do they not solely seek to please themselves at the expense of the sorrow of their parents and families? So it should be understood that any homosexual male or female who wants to adopt a child is both, acting contrary to his/her sexuality, and is attempting to make the well-being of a child secondary; for homosexuals who want to adopt a child are choosing to do so for themselves and never because a child wants to be raised by homosexual males or females. In conclusion: if adoption is acceptable in a society, the choice as to whom the child can be adopted by must remain the sole authority of the progenitors of the child or relatives and never the public or an institution. For neither the public nor any institution can be held accountable for sorry decisions that ill-affect a child; whereas a parent who gives up its’ child for adoption must live with the consequences of that decision and will therefore choose as wisely as is possible in a manner that agrees with the nature of the parent.Homosexual males and females refuse to be parents. And therefore no rational person ought to give their child to a person who is incapable of acting against his or own nature.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

The progenitors give up their authority to the child the second they give it up for adoption. I'm sorry to say that your conclusion is flawed in that regard.If you are not willing to or cannot take responsibility for maintaining a child and "give" it up for adoption, you lose all rights to that child. Hence the term "give him/her up for adoption". You must also note that the acceptance by society makes it an institution.I must lastly note that most of your first paragraph has no psychological validity in the nature of homosexuality.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: No, gays should not adopt

Bare in mind that homosexuals that adhere to the theory of evolution must also necessarily adhere to the principle of the theory which posits the propagation of the fittest sexually reproductive species; and consequently has damned the homosexual, for the homosexual doesn't propagate its species.
Debate: Gay Adoption
Side: Yes, gays should adopt

If I understand your logic correctly, your argument is that since homosexual's cannot naturally produce a child, they have no right to become parents. Am I hearing this correctly?