azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: Yes

One world government is going to happen no matter what. There will be a lot of sacrificing, destruction, death and so forth. We will always disagree among ourselves because thats who we are. This will not happen within the next few years but it will happen in the future. When it does happen the biggest thought to a one world government would need to have more than one person in power. I would say minimum of 3 a maximum or 21 but cannot have an even number. The reason for not having an even number is because the last decision will be the final decision. Everybody can disagree with me but my thoughts are final and i believe it will be true but probably not as accurate. We need to work as one and become one so we can finally colonize other planets (but of course when we colonize other planets we will probably fight each other because we always seem to repeat history in some way) to move forward and advance our technology.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: Yes

One world government will not come about anytime soon but it is the direction humans have been going ever since the first tribes amalgamated and became a bigger tribe. Every country existing today is an amalgamation of different peoples that were either forced together or saw common ground to unite under. We are just in the long process of coming together. It might seem impossible today that Russia and America may someday be governed under the same body but unless the environmental world has a cataclysmic collapse or a world war kills us all we will get there some day. And of course we will have "growing pains" ie: wars, breakups of states. However the common trend since the beginning of human history is uniting. It makes sense if we want to reach our fullest potential as a species. Note: I am in favour of peaceful unification not forced unification :)
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: Yes

I am for a One-World Government, but I am against to it if it is run by corrupt and greedy Elitists! this One-world government should be formed based on democratic and humane principles and should act as a unifying entity of humanity. I am tired of the endless wars and terrorism we face today, there are many nations who are opposed to each other due to their government's (though not all are like this) intense nationalistic propaganda and also due to religious bigotry. We are all Humans, it doesn't matter if you're Black, White, Asian or a Pacific Islander, we all share the same home and the same race, which is the Human race, just because we have different cultures doesn't mean we can't work together and unite for the betterment of the world and for the unification of humanity. UNITY THROUGH DIVERSITY! I am a Human and I oppose nationalism and religious backwardness and bigotry!
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: Yes

I agree with E223, if we have one person in charge and subdivide it that way it could happen. I think of it as an Absolute Monarchy, since we all know a democracy wouldn't happen just look at our country of the USA. Obama can't even get any legislation passed due to the Republicans, yet if Obama was an Absolute Monarch the country would be drastically better or worse... Dictatorship wouldn't work but people getting behind the Monarch and believing in their ideology and beliefs and plans for the future I could see it happening. However we'd have to get rid of money and capitalism since that is always the problem, money, money and more money. Without money corruption wouldn't happen, if you already have the power as an Monarch you can't really get any more. Our population is too great for a evil monarch or dictator they'd get killed probably by his own people but a good fair true monarch could save us all. That Monarch could be me... Just saying....
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: Yes

A One World Government would end war and peace would prevail on Earth.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

changing a goverment is not agood idea .
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

Our government is going to hell, our elected officials can't even agree with each other.. Democracy in the US is a failure, period. We have separation of powers and that is the problem, the President has power over his branch but can't get done what he wants done without serious compromise. Legislative branch does absolutely nothing except make a nice 175K a year for doing the absolute opposite of what they promised to do until elections come around, that is corruption in mind and things need to change that is why a world government wouldn't be a democracy or any kind of government where you need to have elections, it would fail. But the fact remains we do need one and fast before this climate change or any other number of issues causes a serious catastrophe.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

no we should not move
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

Yeah, lets do it. The end of the world is near and this is just one of the signs. Lets get it over with already (;
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: There must be a better way

I have read this article three times and am bewildered at how, exactly, something like this could be set up and work for ALL the people of the world. This is not something which can be accomplished with a trial run. If it didn't work, and I am very wary of something like this happening, how would we go about reversing it?This speaks of countries like India, China, Russia, France, the USA and Euro nations all ceding power to someone or something. The article states "The United Nations is becoming increasingly irrelevant and antiquated, unable to adapt its structure to accommodate rising powers." If we cannot work toward getting The United Nations back to being a relevant entity, how shall we begin a 'New World Order', as it were, and have that be a success?I really don't know if this kind of global government could ever work between countries so very different from one another. What recourse will the people have under such an extreme way of governing? Yes, where will the people go if the horizon gives them nothing more and is no different than the very place they stand on? I don't know Jess, I really don't.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

Exactly what I am saying. Nobody knows how to manage any specific culture more than that culture itself. I wouldn't want somebody who has only read about my culture to have the responsibility of governing it, and I know anybody in any other culture would say the same.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: Yes

kuklapolitan, honestly id expect more from someone who wants prosperity and happiness. The one world government does not need to be reversed and "This speaks of countries like India, China, Russia, France, the USA and Euro nations" - it does not need to be reversed because all these countries will be one powerful union under which they will support each other. This one world government is our only hope of becoming a planetary empire and maybe even solar+.if we were to hand power to someone we ain't going to hand it to some nut job.most likely it would go to a world council and the head of that council will havepower.We are not going to be a military dictatorship, but a democracy.Wars will no longer exist as there will be no need. Human science and technology development on a globally supported scale will be exponentially increased we will have technology we can only dream of.Furthermore, countries all want to be prosperous and develop together even north Korea and south Korea, Israel and Palestine, all these nations will settle for excellent technology, food, peace and a harmonious relationship for ages to come.Who wouldn't? you'd be insane not to.additionally, your point "Yes, where will the people go if the horizon gives them nothing more and is no different than the very place they stand on? " - on travel and holidays. To be honest, the society will still be normal on that, e.g Africa there will still be dark people, just with mobile phones and electricity. I think its selfish of you to suggest that these people who have suffered for years and years without food and electricity to never have it. And if you say oh they should have it, then why not now? why not under a one world government. they ain't going to get it otherwise because they will just keep getting attacked killed and having civil wars.Remember, we are humans and we find strength not just in numbers not just in technology or development but through unity we find strength.and with that unity we can conquer our world and others.it seems a bit far fetched. of course it does in a multi-Govt. world.think of the possibilities don't be a pile of baggage for the rest of the world who is realising we need a one world government. Join the union.the choice is up to you, multiple government multiple wars between humans, humans killing humans, mass genocides and terrorism in abundance.or one world government, cultural happiness, acceptance of all societies, solar empire and peace.(+ we have cookies )
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

You're too optimistic. Open your eyes and see how humans governed themselves in the past! Think about it.. a one world government would detain too much power not to abuse it. A one world government would be dictatorial because that's what happens when all forms of opposition are destroyed. That's what the nazi party did, they became the all-powerful government of Germany and guess what? People lost their civil rights as they were slowly becoming slaves. Read about USSR, and you'll see that when your government tells you he will lead alone, "uniting" the country into a one government state, all the nice promises and expectations vanish as people turn into servants with no rights. I used to think like you back then, and I realised that this kind of government isn't possible.. 15,000 years of civilization have told us that leaders with too much power abuse from it, no matter how advanced our technology is. In fact, technology only makes it easier for a dictatorial state to control their people, look at North Korea; a perfect exemple of modern slave-state, and the entire world will become one if we allow our current world leaders to "unite" and seize control of everyone and everything.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

No, because one worldwide government would ignore the diversity and the differences in cultures throughout the world. The reason that governments are separated into countries is mainly due to the differences in people and what they expect from their government. Even if a government was to try and incorporate the diversity of the world into their system, it would be a massive bureaucratic behemoth. Even governments of countries today cannot meet the needs of the different people that make up their country.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

what if we allowed nations freedom to govern how they wished but had a world organization that dealt only with universal issues? I think we can all agree that human rights and environmental policy are two areas where an international government would be useful, but at the same time not be imposing on other cultures. Allow the nations to keep doing what their doing except in a select few areas that affect the world as a whole. Otherwise you have nations like China who pollute incredible amounts and answer to no one, or like zimbabwe where the government has allowed thousands of it's citizens to starve to death.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: It needs careful planning

If you get your facts like America is the world most polluting country. Advocate so much about Amercian's so call peace and harmony it boils down to one thing. Self Interest. What is it so difficult to ink and ratify the koyoto protocol.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

Are you kidding? Have you never paid attention to any movie ever made that revolves around that theory of a one world government? Equilibrium is a great example of that. There is an underground resistance that must go against this supreme ruer's beliefs and take him down. And they succeed. The problem with a one world governemnt is that not everyone under this government's jurisdiction may agree with their laws but there would be no other place for them to go. With a multiple amount of different governemnts it gives people the choice to choose to live where they agree with government laws and so-forth.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

"World government" doesn't have to mean global fascism like in Equilibrium. Those are just movies; they portray a scrappy rebellion fighting against a powerful empire. It appeals to people and sells tickets. But that's not the way government works in the real world. Modern governments are based on ideas like majority rule and minority rights. They have systems of checks and balances. The complex needs of the governed can be taken into account.Global management could lie anywhere on the spectrum from an all powerful dictator to a loose organization based mainly on cooperation like what we have now. I'm saying we should move in the more powerful direction, but my question is, "How much?"
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

If we allow a one world government to take place, this "powerful" direction you talk about would be very strong indeed for humanity, but only the leading class would benefit from it. A state with too much power inevitably abuse from it, a state with only one party without opposition always become totalitarian. Learn history, and you'll see how naive it is to perceive this one world government as a friendly pal that actually cares about your civil rights. That's why martial law exists in every developped countries in the world, to strip you out of your rights whenever they want.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

You're making the assumption that the government would be oppressive, which is unfair because there's more than just that option.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

No we should not the other side needs to think. Who would govern the government? How would you decide who is running it? There are many other reason's that I could list. This just would not work because of the different governments and the different ties to different people. I don't think this is possible at all.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

it is natural for human beings to search for power. if only one person is ruling the entire world, soon there will be civil wars.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

We already have a world goverment, its called money. It is something to be surpassed, by world wide anarchy.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

One word: Balance. One world government isn't the solution but just the end result of our obession with "bettering" the world. Do you know how peace results? From war. With no war comes no peace. It's dual natured. It's human natured. It is a never ending rollercoaster and we're all on it for the ride. One world government would just lead to more chaos. What happens when you hold all the power and control? That's all a "world government" would become. One giant agenda, and what would that be? Who's to say you'd have a say? And finally, how do you find a balance if there is nothing to balance on?
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: yes

"With no war comes no peace."What? No war is the definition of peace.As has been said in other arguments, it doesn't have to be an all powerful government. It can simply regulate certain things. It can have checks and balances, minority rights, etc. It can have all the features history has taught us make for effective governments.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

Well, a dictator killing off anyone he likes without confrontation (the confrontation being war) I would not consider peace."Let he who wants peace prepare for war."the second paragraph is, as you said, another argument. but just remember the whole thing on peace. The holocaust wasn't a war... but the people fighting against it made a war.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

Regulate certain things? I'm confused by this. I get what you're trying to get at but you haven't convinced me. I'm going to assume that you are looking at this from a western perspective. Now take this into account when trying to mix you're perspective, western, with an eastern perspective.... you're view of the world is different than the rest. And how is one world government going to bring about something "better"? What is better? What are our problems now that a one world government entity would solve or be more efficient at? What do you consider an effective government? I would like to hear of some examples.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

I agree, very bad wording on my part. I wanted to say Without war there is no concept of peace. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/peace  Look at the first definition. Regulate certain things? Then what the hell is the point of one world government? Aren't you guys just reinforcing the concept of the UN?
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

Effective governments don't have to let their working class citizens benefit from it. Read about nazi Germany, it was an effective government; they had a strong economy with impressive manufacturing abilities that were bolstered with innovative technologies. The people, however, had absolutely no rights, because their party was unchallenged, it was unique, all-powerful. A one world government would detain so much power that it would slowly turn everyone into slaves, and guess what? The world government would still be "effective".
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

What helps an economy: A desire to get ahead of others or an understanding of work as a community resource? As demonstrated by the poverty of many former Communist countries immediately after the collapse fo the Soviet Union, a desire to get ahead helps an economy for all members. Therefore, International competition in the long run helps all countries.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

A world goverment will take away the power from all countries and give it all to China. A world government will most likely be a democracy so the country with the biggest population will have all the power. What we have now keeps the power spread around among Nation States and is working fine.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

I am all in favor for a one nation world with no countries. a world where the real problems of today are already dealt with. where politicians aren't split on the important issues. once a world power can lead the way in a great country, then we can start moving into a one world country with no real active government that makes laws to bind us. but instead, a government that helps it's people and leads the way and keeps balance
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

While I would love to see that happen (I think as I need to be careful what I wish for), I am afraid we are all too diverse and this will never happen.Sad, but likely true.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

We would be creating a global elite, a group of the super rich and super powerful people. These "politicians, central bankers, chief executives and lesser mortals". Would answer to no one. These "elite" would be a power unto themselves. A group of millionaires and billionaires. These global elite are insular and benefit from unregulated capitalism. These global elite are causing violence throughout the world. They will force judges to enforce their laws which are placed by their elitist politicians. Because they will and are funding the Congressmen and U.S. Senators, the global elite will threaten and imprison those who do not agree with their exploitation of the world's economy.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

No. Humanity as a species, and as a population is too large, and too diverse for a single government to effectively govern.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

The most prevelant argument for world government is this touchy feely deal of uniting the human species. Well humans have differing opinions on how to live and how to view the world.It would be extremely oppressive to have a one world government as it would be difficult to accommodate all the different views people have of the role of government in their lives.You could attempt to use mass education and propaganda to attempt to sway people to want one world government but everyone would have their own idea of how that government would be like.My view of world government and your view of world government can differ and if my form of world government became reality it would be oppressive to you and it may call for your eradication and the eradication of any who disagree with it in order to preserve the state.Hitler and stalin attempted this utopia by propaganda and when that was not enough to get everyone with the program they began to kill those who opposed in an attempt to evolve humanity and civilization.In both those instances people either did not fit the planned utopia or simply did not want it and led to violence against those with differing thoughts.Think of your version of the perfect world government. Now picture that world government to be the polar opposite of what you want it to be.. Do you still want world government? Regardless of what you think many would be persecuted no matter what form of government you attempted to put in.We do not need world government. There would be peace if the people did not allow their government to wage war. People do not wage wargovernments and people who crave power wage war. All these governments who wage war and crave power have aspirations of world domination via world government. I as a person do not want it but it is a notion put in peoples mind to make you believe that the answer to achieve peace and prosperity is government. When the reality is that government is responsible for all war and oppression.If all you people want peace dominate your government. Do not allow it wage a war based on what governments/special interests want but what the people want.Attempting a one world government will bring death and destruction. The suppression of ideas cultures and the genocide of people. World government has been attempted by many empires. All have ended in nothing but carnage. Are you all aware of what the price is for world government? Are you willing to pay the price? If you life family and lineage everything you are was on the chopping block would you still want it?…
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

For this to happen.we would have to get rid of the U.S.A.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

If there was a one world government, it wouldn't be able to take care of the 6 billion+ people. To many different geographical issues, language varieties, lifestyle situations, etc. It's that simple, no matter how much you try and decorate it.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

There are two flaws that come to my mind when it deals with a one world government. It is too much to run. Secondly, when people don't agree, it is never good and it will be one Civil War.
Debate: Should we move toward one world government?
Side: No

hitler and the ussr tried it; both failed. some forms are right for some, some arent. the thing is if you dont like your worl government, it's alot harder to leave.