azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

You aren't looking at the whole picture.Imagine you are a single mother at home with your kids. If there are no guns, any male that enters your house wins any confrontation with you about 99% of the time. But if you have a gun you are equal. Even if he has a gun too, you are equal. If you have a gun and he has a Machete you have the power to defend yourself and your children.Removing guns from people who want to use it to defend themselves, is leaving them at the mercy of any criminal that decides to target them. It is a sad reality but there are bad people out there, and it is up to you to be responsible and defend yourself, your property, and your family.Sure the police will get there after the crime is over, if your lucky they will get there DURING the crime being committed. But police are reactionary. They only come after the crime has started, and it takes time for them to arrive. The Police do not defend you, it is their job to put people in jail AFTER they commit a crime.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

I said I can pull up thousands of gang violence murders that are done with Machetes.I never said it was in the U.S.But you said comparing stats with other countries was ridiculous , except of course when an idiot like you tries to argue otherwise .So where are the “thousands of machete deaths “ taking place yearly , bet you cannot answer ?  I was stating how gangs in locations that do not have access to guns operate.Machete gangs ? You really are an idiot , ok name the countries that has machete gangs .....bet you cannot answer ?If I was your English teacher you'd get a very low score for reading comprehension.But you wouldn’t even make it into a junior school here such is your level of stupidity......Regarding your own comprehension your teacher should have told you that’s meant to be were not was you dummy
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Ok let's see...http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/07/19/lured-to-park-by-girls-and-hacked-to-death-with-machetes-gruesome-details-show-ms-13-initiation-killings.htmlhttps://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article206950449.htmlhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6465513/london-machete-gang-drill-music-rap-videos-jailed-banned/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/3214859/Machete-gangs-bring-fear-to-South-Africa-as-they-carry-out-mutilations-for-traditional-medicine.htmlhttps://www.reddit.com/r/watchpeopledie/ comments/3mdq2u/gang macheteattackinmalaysia/They are all over the place. I mean that's 5 seconds of googling, not to mention a few websites report that a machete attack happens about every 90 seconds in the UK.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

You said thousands didn’t you ? So let’s see your contention is that if Americans hadn’t guns the population would buy machetes instead and murder and maim each other with them instead , did you ever think of moving buddy ?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

About 150 million people in the USA own a gun.There are about 30-40k deaths caused by guns per year.About 65% of those are suicides.About 80% of what is left are Gang-Related.So if you don't kill yourself and you are not the member of a gang then your chance of being killed by a fire-arm in the United States is about 0.0006%. (That includes Accidental Deaths, Justified Police Killings, Justified Defensive Killings, etc)So if you aren't a criminal or involved in an accident, your chances are even lower.But let's all pretend America has some big issue with guns.Our real issue is Mental Health (suicides) and Gangs.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

they actually perform a very necessary function in civilian life which is to allow weaker humans to defend themselves against stronger humans.You're an idiot. Guns don't "defend". They spit toxic chunks of lead into other humans. If you think that's what "defence" is then there is only one explanation: you're retarded.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

You're an idiot. Guns don't "defend". They spit toxic chunks of lead into other humans. If you think that's what "defence" is then there is only one explanation: you're retarded.I can't believe they haven't invented a device to disable firearms. You could wear it on your wrist like an Assassin's hidden blade and if someone puts a gun to your balls you can just activate the device.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

I can't believe they haven't invented a device to disable firearms. You could wear it on your wrist like an Assassin's hidden blade and if someone puts a gun to your balls you can just activate the device.I don't know if or how that would be possible, but if it was, then it would definitely be a great example of defence.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

I don't know if or how that would be possible, but if it was, then it would definitely be a great example of defence.Spiderman web launcher with a nanotech guidance system that is designed to find the barrel and clog it with adhesive polymere nanotubes.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Tell it to a woman about to be raped who fills her wannabe rapist with lead.http://www.kfvs12.com/story/9273275/accused-rapist-shot-killed-by-victim/
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

NOM you puke up nothing but sheer nonsense !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

NOM why do Leftist call the police ?????????? They got guns ?????????????
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

You're an idiot. Guns don't "defend".Yes they do. If a murderer tries to kill me, I defend myself with a gun. I don't have to kill them, maybe I can shoot them in the leg or arm and disable them. That is defending yourself by using a gun.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

What do you think Defense is then?3 Men break into your home armed with baseball bats.Which would you rather have to defend yourself, your property, and your family:A Shield:A Baseball bat: (Hey you'd be even!)A Knife:A Taser:A Can of Mace:A Gun:Which one would be more effective at achieving the goal of defending your property and lives in this situation?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

What do you think Defense is then?I don't think it's the same thing as attack. Attack is an antonym of defence. It means the literal opposite thing.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

If a group of Soldiers were unarmed, and they were attacked by people with guns, you would consider them to be "Defenseless".if a group of Soldiers were armed, and they were attacked by people with guns, they would then be able to defend themselves.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

It went right over his head. That's why he vanished.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Except for the fact that we shouldn't have to defend ourselves against stronger humans in such a civilised world. Only America's military should use guns.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Right, so when America's military starts fighting who it's supposed to protect, civilians won't even have to defend themselves.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Oh your right. I forgot there is a way to eliminate violent crime.Oh wait there isn't, and also 1% of humans are psychopaths.We don't live in a fantasy land, and police are reactionary. You don't buy a gun because you want to use it. You buy a gun hoping you never have the need to use it. Knowing that some day you may be glad you had one.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Except for the fact that we shouldn't have to defend ourselves against stronger humans in such a civilised world.I would be interested to hear the armed muggers thoughts on the subject. In the off chance you ever get mugged, try to explain this to them.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Dermot it is designed to kill and puts wild game in the freezer and food on the table for a family so you got it right. Damn good job and perfectly done.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Dermot it is designed to kill and puts wild game in the freezer and food on the table for a familyDo you hunt or do you just say these things while you bring your legal murder weapon to the grocery store?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

NOM are you opposed to me hunting wild game ????????????Fresh backstrap from a whitetail deer is excellent on the grill !!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Weapons in general are murder weapons. Forks can kill, but they're legal. Why is that?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Oh do shut up you idiotic brute , a gun is designed to kill you fucking half - wit a car is designed to transport people , goods etc car deaths are accidental gun deaths are mostly not .The hilarious thing is you claim to be a “Christian “ and idiots like you actually think if Jesus roamed the earth today he would carry a gun ...... Ignore
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Intent doesn't matter when one is much more deadly than the other.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

What do you mean ?...........................................................
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

As always, control fanatics like you do not care about saving lives, you just want to take our guns.It's not an accident when a person chooses to drink too much and then drive! He is playing Russian roulette with other's lives.IGNORE
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

As always, control fanatics like you do not care about saving lives, you just want to take our guns.I know terrible isn’t it “fanatics “ like me think 30,000 to 40,000 gun deaths a year are appalling add on 70,000 odd gun accidents , schools shootings etc, etc, and Americans think it’s something to be proud off , sure idiots like you go to church and console yourself that “ Hey Jesus would have carried a gun “ ....... How are you so fucked in the head ?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

LOL, you lack the honesty to even talk about drunk driving and the many many more deaths of children and adults. So you obviously drink and don't want to be bothered with control fanatics trying to put more restrictions and back ground checks on your alcohol consumption.You are an absolute waste of time...IGNORE!
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

*In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States.That's awesome. Nobody died from nuclear weapons during that period, therefore nuclear weapons are safe and should be legalised immediately.Take your retarded logical fallacies back to the Westboro Baptist Church you militant wingnut retard.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Lets, see, MANY MANY MANY MORE CHILDREN ARE KILLED BY DRUNK DRIVERS THEN SOME LUNATIC MASS KILLERS, BUT WHY TALK ABOUT THEIR LIVES AND THE CAUSE OF THEIR DEATH. YOU DRINK SO HANDS OFF YOUR VICE!LETS JUST TALK ABOUT GUNS BECAUSE WE ARE RADICAL CONTROL FANATICS WHO DON'T LIKE GUNS AND WANT BIG GOVERNMENT TO CONTROL THE PEOPLE!
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

It seems, Joe, that you're living in a fantasy world. Guns aren't the only thing used in murders, for one, so I doubt that it would drop as significantly as you think. If it dropped at all, that is. Second, how are license agreement violation charges going to dissuade people from killing each other?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

It seems, Joe, that you're living in a fantasy world.Oh, the pure, unadulterated irony. Over thirty thousand completely preventable deaths per year, but HE'S living in the fantasy world?? As retards go, you're a large one.You're literally delusional kid. Literally.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

preventableAnd how would you prevent those thirty thousand gun deaths? By the way, most of those are suicides by people who were able to legally obtain the firearm they used.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

And how would you prevent those thirty thousand gun deaths?Ahahahahahaha! I refuse to believe that's a serious question. Think really hard about it buddy.By the way, most of those are suicidesYeah, this fallacy is one of my particular favourites because people are always less dead when they commit suicide. Good point.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

30,000 deaths is tiny compared to 350,000,000 people. It's not even a blip on the radar. And with most of those deaths being suicides, and most of the rest being gang on gang, there's almost zero chance I get shot today.As for your snarky, toxic tone, how were you planning on defending yourself against all these Nazis & fascists you claim exist? Bean flip?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

30,000 deaths is tiny compared to 350,000,000 people.By that logic it was fine to kill 6 million Jews because there were 80 million people in Germany. I mean, you literally have the brain of a twelve year old child. You can't compare dead people to alive people and then argue it proves the dead people should be dead. That's unbelievably stupid. A fairer comparison would be between the 30,000 completely unnecessary, completely preventable gun deaths per year, and the 1,000 people killed by Hurricane Katrina, which constituted a national emergency.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

No, it isn't about if someone is less or more dead.60% of gun deaths in the U.S. are Suicides.Of the remaining 40%, about 80% of those are gang-related.Which leaves 5% of gun deaths in the united states are homicides, accidental deaths, self defense, police shootings, mass shootings, etc. We have an incredibly low amount of gun deaths per capita. We have enough guns to arm every man woman and child in a country of over 300 million people, and more people die from kitchen appliances every year than these remaining 5% of gun deaths.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

about itSorry, I forgot that you want to repeal the 2nd Amendment.Good pointThe mere fact that you want to repeal the 2nd Amendment is enough evidence for myself to prove that you are anti-Constitution and anti-America.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Being against a given Amendment does not mean you are against the Constitution. Nor is it anti-Constitution to be in favor of amending it. The most recent Amendment was in 1992. Those involved successfully changed the Constitution. Where they anti-American? What about those who were against the 18th Amendment which outlawed drinking? Anti-American? No.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

I worded myself wrong. I mean that by being against the 2nd Amendment, you are against the human right to self-preservation granted by the Second Amendment.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

The mere fact that you want to repeal the 2nd Amendment is enough evidence for myself to prove that you are anti-Constitution and anti-America.Wanting to stop kids getting shot every day is anti-America, you are absolutely correct. Another great point.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

stop kids gettings shotIf a kid really wants to kill his classmates, he's going to do it regardless of restrictions. And, when that kid obtains a gun, legally or otherwise, and shoots up his school, who's going to take him down if no citizen can legally own a gun? I hope you see what I'm getting at.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

If a kid really wants to kill his classmates, he's going to do it regardless of restrictions.This is retard logic. You are trying to use a fact (i.e. some people will kill regardless) to validate the opposite of a fact (i.e. we should therefore make it ten times easier for them by arming them with guns). Your statement is, at very best, completely fucking irrelevant.And, when that kid obtains a gun, legally or otherwise, and shoots up his school, who's going to take him down if no citizen can legally own a gun?Ah, the old "we need more guns to save us from all the guns" circular reasoning. How refreshing. Jesus Christ you're so stupid. In Britain we do not need to give out automatic weapons to our school children to "protect" them from maniacs with automatic weapons. Do you know why? BECAUSE WE DON'T GIVE OUT AUTOMATIC WEAPONS TO MANIACS IN THE FIRST PLACE!! You are literally so much of a retard that you want to arm everybody, right down to little old ladies and pre-pubescent school children, instead of just doing the simple thing and taking the gun away from the shooter. Nobody needs guns to defend themselves in a society which isn't selling guns, because the bad guys don't have guns.You and your entire gun culture are fucking retarded. You've had your brain melted with fallacious NRA bullshit your entire life. It's a wonder you know up from down, if indeed you even do.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

arming them with gunsNo one wants kids to get shot, and no one is arming depressed 15-year-olds while knowing what they'd do with the weapons.irrelevantNo, not if you're saying that repealing the 2nd Amendment would result in fewer gun murders. Gangs will always be able to obtain firearms one way or another, so those numbers wouldn't fluctuate just by repealing the 2nd Amendment.from all the gunsWho's going to take the gun from the maniac shooting up his school? A security guard with pepper spray and a walkie-talkie?In BritainYes, your gun laws are extremely strict. I understand. Now, would you like to comment on the rampant knife crime and acid attacks?school childrenI never said you should give guns to kids. You said that. Please don't put words in my mouth.automatic weaponsYou're not able to legally own an automatic weapon without a gun license that is very* difficult to obtain.little old ladies and pre-pubescent school childrenI never said any of that. Where did you get this?taking the gun awayAnd how would you take away a gun from a "gun-wielding maniac"?which isn't selling gunsLegality would only harm the ability of good Samaritans to protect themselves from gang members and other criminals who own guns illegally.bad guys don't have gunsUnless they buy guns illegally. That's a bit of a spanner in the works.fucking retardedGood word choice in a debate in which I'm attempting to be civil.fallacious NRA bullshitI don't believe I've read anything from the NRA in my life.if indeed you even doGood to know that when you've run out of arguments, you resort to insulting your opponent.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

NOM you want to speak up on the Chicago gun violence ????????? Come on Dummy nut up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

NOM you ain't got nothing but an ignorant pie hole !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

We'll just have everything have an end user license agreement ;)
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Agreements are worthless when people will disobey them regardless. You act like everyone wants to kill someone and we need to put into place laws preventing them from doing so. Fact of the matter is that normal, everyday people don't want to murder their wife and kids.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Then they should have no problem with the end user license agreement ;)
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

There's no point in implementing pointless policies. The agreement wouldn't matter in the first place.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

They implement pointless policies all the time ;)
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Saying "we should add a EULA to gun purchases" is like saying "we should outlaw crime".----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Hey!!! That's not a bad idea ;)
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

How does this work ? - Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.When one inherits family guns should the guberment make me sign a license agreement?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Just make it so that if you want to use a gun, you need a license. Just like driving a car ;)