Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

By atheist bullshit you mean not accepting an unproven, unsupported and generally absurd claim as a equal possibility to real science? OkUnproven? Of course. It has never been proven or disproven. 50:50. Next?Unsupported......now that is just ignorance. Unsupported by what? Science? Lol. That is a no brainer. If a Theist theory holds true then what is Science doing? Explaining God's creation. We are still at 50:50. Next?Generally absurd? Opinion. Can't dispute that.What is fake science? Science: systematic knowledge, esp. of the physical world, gained through observation and experimentationIf you can only obtain information based on what you can observe and God is an infinitly maximal being how will you logically comprehend or understand him? You can't. What observation would you make? Study what God put before you and watch it. That's it. A concept you seem to fail at grasping. Typical Atheist.Until they've proven this god exists and that he created everything that claim can't be used. It's empty and bullshit and should be dismissed.How will you prove or disprove it? God is a maximally infinite being. How wilk a human comprehend or understand his works? Mind explaining that logically? Dismissal? Sure. Just shows ignorance. A god hasn't been proven to exist at all so that claim shouldn't even be taken seriously.That isn't my point. Here we go again. I told you it's 50:50. A God hasn't been disproven. The claim can be taken seriously. Don't start bullshitting me again.And no we haven't tested everything in the universe that is impossible but we HAVE tested a fuckton and that is including every single physical law that governs our universe.Oh so testing everything is impossible? So how can you claim everything is natural if all hasn't been tested and how does that logically disprove that God just didn't make that? I understand our laws. They govern fine. So we know a ton and yet have ZERO indication of anything supernatural existing or needing to exist.Where did those laws come from? Hmmm? Again, you are being a typical Atheist. If God can start from a singularity and not touch anything, everything would go naturally on it's own. That is the possibility I am trying to get through to you. Therefore anything you study is just a creation. It's all natural.Where did it start?So when we make theories and hypothesis on what happened at the birth of the universe using Occam's razor we should consider the explainations requiring the least assumptions and speculations and strays from reality.The fewest assumptions should be selected. 1) God did it.....2) Thats it. That is just one assumption. Do you fully underatand the Razor?So it's either a natural explaination that is supported by evidence and the fact that everything we know is natural and there's no indication of supernatural anywhere, or we completely forgo all the laws of physics and everything we know to make a giant assumption about what is completely outside of space and time dipped into our reality and caused something natural to occur.Why drop the laws of physics? Why drop any of it? You are being ignorant now. You just assume that if a God started it all that all laws a just broken? That is illogical. The laws would still govern. They would be a creation froma higher order. They would created new things natural from themselves with a natural root to God. Normal logic.One makes giant unsupported assumptions based on myth. One is based in reality and evidence. It is not 50/50. We don't know for 100% certain yet but for fucks sake it isn't an even toss up not even close.Now I know you missed the point. If God made a singularity and just let it go what will you be able to describe? The natural qualities of the universe right? That stemmed from what? Ignorance is not a bliss for you as of now. Myth? Sure. Possibility? Yep.You can't claim that anything is part of a gods creation until that god is proven to existIllogical. If I say a God did it it is a logical assumption. You will never understand a maximally infinite being nor its creation. It is ignorant to believe you can especially since we are limited. For example. Can God make a four sided triangle? First if that exists in the realm of physics show me. Otherwise its nonsense. However, a triangle is a shape ordained by man. A polygon is a shape ordained by man. The mindset of a limited individual. Can God make a married bachelor? Can God make a Eukaryotic Prokaryote? No, no, and no. Why? First show me they exist. Then if you cannot show me I declare that nonsese and cannot be equated to a maximal being. If he is omnipotent he cannot do something that makes him non-omnipotent for he is omnipotent. Same argument. Same logic. I can say something that cannot be proven or disproven. It can be dismissed but it cannot be false or true. Therefore you cannot say I can't say it. Logically I can.Well tough shit because it is t anywhere close to proven and has NOTHING to support it at all.You truly missed the notion of my argument. References are above for you. It "ain't" anywher close to being disproven so that tough shit for you. My shit is smooth since I am making the claim. It is tough on you because I can logically continue to say it. It cannot be proven true or false. You can dismiss it and I can continue it. That is how it works.You can't say, "oh I don't know and you don't know so ahaha were both stupid" no. Sorry.What? I don't know what? What is the point of posting this if you lack specifications as to what we don't know?