azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: YES

Absolutely they are a waste of money, especially when countries that are already financially crippled & with plenty of impoverished citizens blow billions upon billions of dollars (e.g. Greece & Brazil) & countries like England could have better spent the estimated £24 billion that was spent upon the previous Olympics in London...mind you, it's typical of England/Great Britain to only focus their resources upon London - no wonder so many Scots want out of the United Kingdom!!And while I'm currently flicking from screen to screen (of the 4 available to watch here in Australia), I'm seeing one half-empty stadium after another at these games in Rio, especially at sports that are not even traditional Olympic sports - e.g. Rugby 7's, canoeing, tennis... And ever since I was a kid in the early 80s - when the Olympics were supposedly for amateur athletes - things have changed so much when one considers the 'value' of the athletes in basketball (especially the US team), road cycling (the top pro' cyclists such as Froome, Porte, Nibali, Valverde, etc), tennis (Nadal, Djokovic, Federer, etc) & a number of other 100% professional sports...just like most sports in general, money has ruined things.And finally, I must laugh when people try to justify the cost of holding such an event in order to promote tourism - if they can't fill stadiums while the Olympics are being held, then how in God's name will they flock to the cities afterward, simply because of the Olympics?! Did they honestly not know that such cities as Sydney, London & Rio existed BEFORE they held the Olympics?!!
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: YES

they are a waste of money because the 2008 summer games cost 40 bill on dollars it takes alto of money out of a country like rio had to go 20 percent over budget. One country went 759 percent over budget they had to pay 51 bill on dollars they spent 3 decase paying it off
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: YES

yesssssssssssssss the olympic games are a TOTAL waste. The money they spend on the games, the money they could spend on better health care, education and even save the homeless!
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: YES

They are more of a waist of money for the country holding them then the world as a whole, and more of a waist for the city it is held in then the country it is held in. Money made in the country and city will be offset by the cost of facilities both before and after the games. The value to the world is arguable because it centers our worth on unproductive games instead intellectually achievements.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

The olympics is a good form of entertainment as well as unite countries together and can even form friendships. Also, with the amount of fans watching, the money is made back.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

The Olympics was and is a great tradition, it brought investments and inspires people to be more active too.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

I believe the vast majority of Olympics held have brought in quite a bit more money than the initial cost of holding them. I could be wrong though :/
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

olympics is held only every 4 yrs and many people find it fun so i think it is not a waste of money.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

No I don't think a tinge so . Outweighing its beneficial sides comparison to the other sides , Olympics , really brings a vast array of helpful and good main and side effects to its organising country and folks , of course . Surplus of bulk and chunk of monetary income into country's pocket certainly burst a wide grin for the rest of the countryfolks . The attractions of it , is like suction - irresistable , drawing tourists and backpackers , to flow in to the event-holding cities . Most of the countries in the world is recovering from the economic recession , right ? So , why keep such a good opportunity to cash in at bay ? Saying of pumping money to the poverty , this action should be done from time to time . But , investment in a gigantic , honorable event like Olympic , swearly will have hefty and great returns - few folds . More poor people will be aided , just at the expense of about a month or so . Why not give it a good shot ?
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

Olympics is one of the great events in the world of sports. I take the view that it is not only a waste of money. Olympics brings more money than we spend on it, but I may be mistaken. I believe Olympics brings countries together, and can even form friendships between some countries. And when you think about construction of a stadium in the world, to always hold the Olympics there, it will be a great conflict in the world.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

It shows countries though separated by distance- can be united and I agree with Margarita that it does show we have things in common.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

The Olympic games bring regeneration to cities and regions and provide a galvanizing force for communities to come together. They encourage and inspire new generations to reach higher. They are a wonderful representation of international co-operation.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

The olympics might cost a lot of money, but all the money gets paid back through tickets, but also because billions of people enter the city which gives it an extreme boost with tourism. Also the olympic games unites the countries together in a peaceful manner.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

No because many people see this eventand it is very funny
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

olympics gives something to cheer for people it also could be a festival for people around the country.It can help government to increase its money or income.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

its not a waste of money because people at home enjoy watching the Olympic games.
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

These Olympics show that the participants have talent. This shows a goal for these Olympic players that are good at something. If that country wins and the other top 2 win money. They win money for them and that country. So the players help there country. If they're in debt(country) they get money to help them. Another fact is that people look up to those Olympic players. Like me, I look up to Miguel Cabrera. He is an inspiration
Debate: Are Olympics a waste of money?
Side: NO

I think the Olympics are not a waste of money. They show each countries' pride. It brings almost the whole world together. This creates world unity. It also gives people hope and courage to train and become better people. It helps people's dreams come true to be a famous athlete. The Olympics have also helped poor needy people reach their needs and earn their own money.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

In the real world, the sexes are usually going to be competing against each other. Might as well get the students used to it.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

Yes*
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

I believe we should stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender because of the following:1. Sports are taught to impart a skill to the student2. Sports are taught to show how exercise can be helpful to fitness, coordination and stamina3. Sports are taught to impart teamwork skills.All of the above are important and gender has nothing to do with any of the three. Therefore I believe sports classes should not be split my gender.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

All three of your reasons for coed sports are just as achievable in segregated classes. When you consider how horny teenagers are, its seems wise to separate them.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

When you consider how horny teenagers are, its seems wise to separate them.Should homosexual students be barred from participating in gender-segregated sports, then?
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Right, because they are going to start fucking on the gym floor. Give me a break.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

Can you say "coed wresting". Gave me a break
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Seen coed wrestling in high schools. Actually interviewed students and coaches. Was not a problem. They certainly were not fucking each other on the mats...
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

today you say yes mate,but when the girls' participation would plummet as daboiz would enjoy their superiority and they would face some sort of harrassment at the hands of the other lot(the boys) ,you would say "no".Authorities concerned are no "mighty fools".
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Yes*
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

today you say yes mate,but when the girls' participation would plummet as daboiz would enjoy their superiority and they would face some sort of harassment at the hands of the other lot(the boys) ,you would say "no".Authorities concerned are no "mighty fools".
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

I have seen on evidence that coed physical education courses serve students any less efficiently than segregated courses do. I certainly never suffered from having been in them. The risks of segregation, however, are fairly apparent in my opinion.While physicality differences between biological males and biological females will generally hold consistent, they are both exaggerated and non-absolute averages. The exaggeration stems from historically unfounded and sexist views that categorized women as inherently physically inferior to a significant degree, without any real scientific basis; this is why Class IX had to happen in the first place. Further, for those students (male and female) who are exceptions to the actual biophysical norms being stuck in segregated courses can be damaging either by imposing underexertion or overexertion.Additionally, neither sex nor gender actually exist on a binary so segregated courses will inevitably leave intersex and gender queer students in a grey area. This is not only a practical problem, but can further isolate such students and open them up to harassment and bullying.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

I didn't know that was still an issue.I feel that since the competition isn't for anything, and everyone gets a grade regardless, that no one has anything to lose by playing with someone who physically out classes them. I mean if we're dividing people up so that they can compete better, why don't we just put all the bookish people in a separate class from the athletic people as well?
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Yes, because it's makes it easier for the girls to win in school sports... Like the boy and girl best scores are way off, so like any fairly good girl could win.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

I think the time is here to end the gender separation in Sports.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

Here's the thing, biologically speaking males are naturally more capable for certain physical activity, as are women more capable to do others better. So the classes should focus on what each gender needs to focus on for a successful habit of exercise to be made. Students should be able to choose if they want to focus on what the other gender is working on though.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

So why continue the cycle?Why not put females and males through the same exercises so that genes are altered, thus bringing the next genderations closer to being physiologically equal?
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

I agree, that would be ideal. But completely impossible to successfully do in our society. The school systems won't push to advance students like that, in fear of upsetting parents. Which is why I included it should be a choice, they should have both class types though
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Screw the parents! They don't know what's good for their kids. D:<
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Hahaha, and who is to say a school system does? The success of the students growth also has to do with what the child is naturally capable of as well. So it's difficult to say either way. Sadly, this is where majority rules injures some of the students growth.But I'm rambling a bit, please excuse me. It's been awhile since I've had the chance to be on here
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

How would this be accomplished? Would women sacrifice some of the organs that make them unique for a bit more space for the muscle that they would use to play American football? Do you realize that both men and women have been doing manual labor for millennia? Yet men are still generally stronger and women more flexible. If the genes did magically alter because a few girls started wrestling instead of playing volleyball, and some men started participating in professional netball, resulting in the differences between the sexes disappearing, we had better learn how to reproduce asexually.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

Would women sacrifice some of the organs that make them unique for a bit more space for the muscle that they would use to play American football?No.Do you realize that both men and women have been doing manual labor for millennia?Yes.Yet men are still generally stronger and women more flexible.Because they have not been conditioning themselves to be more flexible or stronger.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

I do beg your pardon. I had believed you said: "Why not put females and males through the same exercises so that genes are altered, thus bringing the next genderations closer to being physiologically equal?" I am terribly sorry for the misunderstanding.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

NP.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

That awkward moment when your sarcasm is so advanced that uninformed people agree with you.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

That awkward moment when you realize that your sarcasm was just ignored.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

No boy is going to join gymnastics, for example, if the whole class is made up of girls.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

Strange. Being surrounded by girls is incentive for boys to join most things. They're led by their penises.Y'know?
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

I disagree with that, because I know countless of boys and girls who just did what they wanted. A boy in my school played flute even though he got hell for it, a girl played wrestling, and so forth. Of course, that does raise the question of who is to blame for that sexism. I don't believe it's because boys are better suited for specific physical activities, rather society who judges. We can't simply change societies views, but we can at least give students an option to be brave enough to question their own.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: Yes

My physical education courses - sports, fitness, and weight training - were all coed. It really was not an issue. Honestly, initial physical health was far more relevant and noticeable. A lot of the gendered norms about physical ability are exaggerated, rendering it less of a concern than one might think in coed courses and also lending credibility against segregating courses since it can facilitate sex-based discrimination due to those exaggerations.
Debate: Should we stop segregating sports classes in schools by gender?
Side: No

unless it's segregated boys would deprive the other lot(the girls) of their share,girls' participation would plummet and then you ld all say we shud hav said "no" to this topic.Authorities concerned are no fools in segregating these classes being fully aware of the"other" risks involved in it.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

AI would prefer football because football is more of a challenge and you need more skills basketball yea you need skills but what just shooting a ball in a hoop that doesn't take much athleticism or skill actually but in football you need to be in shape athletic and not to mention you have all the pads and everything. I mean when have you seen a three hundred pound Man Run just as good as a one hundred eighty pound man in basketball
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

In my point of view, football is the most interesting sport in the world. I think, today more than half of the people interested in football and half of them play. There are several reasons why most of people interested in this kind of sport. Firstly, football it isn't just game it is like an art, where people not only run with the ball, but also they show feints with the ball, team playing and beautiful goals. Secondly, it is champions league. I think, it is the best championship in the world. There is no better feelings than when you are watching champion's league games, because this tournament has everything: emotions,intrigue and tears. I think thats why football is the best game in the world.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

I play both. My speed helps with this one.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Football is better in many aspects. It is much more better to watch, and if you get some people together it is very fun. It requires you to do much more. Also, basketball can be more annoying.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Basketball

Totally, I agree. Watching men running with a ball trying to not get raped is entertaining. That's like the hunger games. So here's my aspect on football. First to get ready you must practice stamina, catching, throwing, and tackling. Stamina to run from the 11 people trying to throw you down on the ground, Catching to catch a football so you can run from 11 people, Throwing to get rid of the ball so you don't get chased by 11 men to the touchdown, Tackling to throw people down and release aggression. Sounds a lot like the hunger games to me.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

W O W. That was extremely stupid. If you talk like that you can make anything sound stupid. Basketball is a bunch of people running around trying to fling a ball in a hoop. Then they go crazy and flop around when someone just barely touches them. ^I know monkeys that can do that.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Basketball

Thats no where near basketball. Basketball is a sport of skill, logic, and teamwork. I bet you can't even play football. Do you even actually like football? I do, but do you like it because others like it and you don't? I think thats the case here.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Logic. Wtf? Ya ok. I can play football, and I am good at it. I'm not great and I am no allstar but you wouldn't know. I also like basketball. You said "but do you like it because others like it and you don't" that doesn't make any sense. How could I like it because I don't like it. And by the way, that isn't true at all. You wouldn't even know. I like football because its a good sport. You don't know me and don't know sports, and use stupid, foolish reasoning. I think that's the case here.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Foot ball ius the best sport ever It rocks.It rocks It rocks.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

In both you are scoring all the time, however, I would argue American Football is better, as the best players in basket ball are genrally the tall ones.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

I don't play either, but I find football much more interesting to watch. I understand both sports include athleticism and strategy, although football seems to require a little more planning, scoring is more exciting, etc. Also, I like how football is weighted- the points in a game and games in a season, and there's no series of games in playoffs.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

I play football and i tried basketball but i personally felt like there was missing contact so i stopped basketball
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

I think football is better than basketball because football is a popular game
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Football is more exciting. Plus, there is the SuperBowl.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Most of the population in India love cricket, but I'm here to tell you otherwise, it's football. Its the best game in the world. Football is a game which was founded in England and is now played in all of the continents of the world, except Antarctica.Football is a game which comprises of two teams which have 11 players each. Each team can have a maximum of six substitutes, from which only three are allowed to be substited. It is played for 90 minutes. These 90 minutes are divided into two halfs of 45 minutes each. A break of 15 minutes is given at the half called half time break.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Both football and basketball are popular sports that have their unique characteristics. Football is known for its physicality and strategy, while basketball is known for its fast-paced action and high-scoring games. As a fan of both sports, I enjoy keeping track of the latest scores and statistics on https://azscore.com/football/leagues/bahrain/2nd-division-2  a reliable sports scores website. It's fascinating to see how the different leagues and teams perform throughout the season. If you're a sports fan, I recommend checking out a good sports scores website to keep up with your favorite teams and sports.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Basketball

I play both. My ups help with this one.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Basketball

I perfer basketball over football. For starters basketball takes skill and practice. Yeah football takes practice and skill but to what extent? For bqsketball you need to practice dribbling, shooting, passing, and crossing people over. And for football all you need is muscle, stamina catching and throwing.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

I think you forgot some skills. Flopping, intentional fouling, complaining to the refs, and how to take a foul.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Basketball

No, thats the ragemonkeys. Thats like 1 or 2 out of the whole team.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

Everyone on the basketball team for the NBA needs to do those things, except for maybe argue with the refs. Name someone who doesn't.
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Football

First of all i know people who are like twigs but still play i know dwarvs that can probably hit harder than you but everyone knows this ONLY THE QB NEEDS TO THROW THE BALL
Debate: Football vs Basketball
Side: Basketball

I prefer basketball because in football you have more chance of injury due to the fact people hit hard in football. Basketball is a lot more competitive and it takes skill because you have to practice constantly if you want to be really good. Football is easy anybody could easily play football.