azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

maybe you are the one whose new here - there are things that make you lose points. if you can read, click on my (or anyone's) name and it will take you to their profile. For example I clicked on your name and you have 261 arguments (about 100 fewer than i have) and have been on CreateDebate just under 100 days and I joined more than 260 days ago.I'm sure I've responded to you enough to prove I'm no puppet account. Now how 'bout you provide a better argument than Obama's name is close to Hitler's name (even though they are different lengths and don't have any letters in common) - and that somehow people should not like Obama because of it.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

sorry you are correct I apoligise for my mistake .
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Obama is a pro-abortionist. Killing babies is wrong so stop doing it. The new health reform bill is not good. There are some good things but more worse than good. You could have just passed some laws instead of making a whole bill. People are retarted for agreeing with you. Everyone shouldnt have to pay for health care because they might not be able to pay for it because they are not employed aymore because their jobs are shutting down because they need to pay for other peoples health care. Its not are fault if some girl decides to go and have unprotected sex and end up pregnant and want to have an abortion. They should have to still have the baby. They should not have other people pay for their bills because they are young and have no job, in that case they do not have the money to pay for it. Then it will raise peoples insurance to help pay for peoples hospital bills. Last but not least i believe marajuana should be legalized so that all these people wont be going to jail over stupid reasons and the police can focus on the more important things to stop in our neighborhoods.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

I would like to preface this by stating you are a moron.Generally I would not engage in any type of discussion with a complete idiot, but it should at least be pointed out to you (not that your capable of understanding much of anything beyond how and when you are going to get high again) that every country that has a similar healthplan as the one just passed pays less for healthcare, and receives better care. All of them. Every country with a similar plan. Also, we were the only industrialized country in the entire world that still had this antequated type of healthcare that was solely run by a for-profit money machine. Health insurance companies have been raping us for years with double digit cost increases for absolutely no reason but that they wanted more money. For that alone Obama is already going to go down in history as a great president - hate to break it to you.I would also like to point out that fetuses are not babies, and that Jesus was having unprotected sex with a prostitute.Okay, go get high again, hopefully you forget this site's url.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Federal regulation of health care should be limited and focusedFor example, individuals who are continuously covered for a specified period of time should not be denied access to insurance because of pre-existing conditions.individuals should be allowed to purchase insurance across state lines, free from costly state benefit requirements.Finally, individuals and small businesses should be allowed to form purchasing pools to lower insurance costs and improve choice.Regulation can correct common failures in insurance markets, but it is often counterproductive.Regulation places a burden on good portions of the economy, not just bad portions.Regulations function as a hidden tax. The federal government’s own Small Business Administration placing the price tag of regulation at $1.75 trillion annually—much higher than the entire burden of individual and corporate income taxes combined.federal agencies today have near plenary power to issue whatever regulations they see fit. Though most are nominally controlled by the president, in actual practice agencies are frequently able to act autonomously with little or no presidential oversight. The end result is an economy subject to the whims of unaccountable bureaucrats pursuing their own agendas. A new regulation can suddenly transform a profitable investment into an unprofitable one or render employees unproductive. This produces uncertainty with all its attendant economic ills.Just because we have the worst portions of the market, and the worst portions of socialism in American healthcare, does not mean we need to go towards more socialism... These countries that you hold up as models, are more efficient than ours, but they are going away from generous social programs, because they are going broke...You point out that these other countries are more efficient, but Obamacare increases the paperwork, and decreases efficiency. How does Obamacare improve things?
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Killing babies isn't wrong. It's called population control. Besides. We could use those fetuses for stem cell research.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

don't know how accurate this site is, but it gives a good idea of what hes donehttp://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ promises/ seems hes doing alright so far
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Good find. The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

He is far better than anything the RNC has put forth.He represents more than the hope of change for a nation, but the desire to return to our non-religious-super-zealotous views of who we really are as Americans.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Says the man who uses a foreign flag as a picture for his profile.And i love how you made no mention of his politics.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Says the man who uses a picture of a socialist/marxist foreigner for his profile. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Connolly"The picture I use is of James Connolly, a man I greatly admire"http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Why_did_you_choose_the_name_and_picture_ you_use_for_this_site#arg127243 silly silly argument
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

I admire James Connolly's bravery on Easter 1916 and his stance on Womens rights. He received education no farther than a middle-schooler so his politics are of course simple-minded.If I may ask you a question, did you know of James Connolly before you saw my post "The picture I use is of James Connolly, a man I greatly admire"?
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

I had heard of him before, though I did not know that was his picture and it was good to refresh my memory on him. I wasn't commenting on him in particular, just the foreign avatar discredits your argument hypothesis.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

I am glad that I voted for Obama. He was a great choice. I'm happy that we finally have a black president! He deserved that position. I hope that the anti-obamas do realize that if he fought against abortion then he would have had to make some place for those babies to go if the parents didn't want the child.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Of course that makes a little sense, but that's murder. And I dont care that he's black he's also an idiot!
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Abortion is no more murder than jacking off and killing all those little semen, or stepping on an ant. And actually Obama is near genius. He came from a lower middle class family, yet still received all types of honors all throughout school and in Ivy league schools no less. I'm sure his IQ is at least double that of you... or that retard anti-abortinists put in office last time Bush. By the way, how did Bush do with that making abortion illegal thing? I forget...
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Nice! Breaking News  Liberals are voting for Obama because he's black.Such racism...
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Obama is doing fine. Hell, I'll vote for him in 2012. His election brought a lot of racists out of the woodwork which happens to include, (big surprise), the majority of the Republican Party. Obama isn't the next Hitler. If you think so then you've been listening to/watching to much Glenn Beck. I say GObama. (Go + Obama)
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Again someone supports him blindly calling everyone else a racist.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

He said that most racists are in the Republican party, not that everyone who doesn't support Obama is racist.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Well, I'm not wrong. Some people just can't seem to let go of their old ways. If the idea of an African-American as the President of the United States makes you uncomfortable as it did so many people, you're a racist.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

You will judge me and call me a racist based on my political ideals?I could just as easily call you an anti-American communist who only supports Obama because he is half black.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

You call me a racist based on my political ideals?I could just as easily call you an anti-American communist who only supports Obama because he IS half blackNOTE: my apologies i did not see my previous reply so i concluded it was not completed, i will mark this as "none".
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

You could. But that would be flawed just like the rest of your logic.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

But that would be flawed just like the rest of your logic.I'm assuming you voted for Obama because he's half black as you have no other argument to support him. And in that case your logic is flawed because you support a political figure due to the way he looks.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Yes, and while "giving it" to those mean racists is important, I'm afraid I have to tell you something that should sadden you deeply:The country is in ruins; Barack Obama is not working. Get off your elitist high horse and face reality.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

People are pissed off right now. The economy sucks. We're worried about terrorism. We're all going to look at Obama through that pissed off lense. The same thing that's happening to Obama happened to Reagan, too.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

It is now 2015 and I am glad that I voted for Obama twice.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Obama was not a good choice. I can only give him credibility when he can guarantee that has sat down and read all 1000+ pages of the health care legislation he is pushing so intently. Only when a politician reaches out to the public divulging every detail of how legislation will work and can then explain in detail how any random citizen's particular situation will be affected, will they gain my respect. Obama has not done this. He has not shown any effort in attempting to do this.He is no more than a professional politician. He, just like any other politician, was elected by money and has not and will never know what the life of the average US citizen is like. Modern politicians are completely out of touch with the average American and therefore cannot begin to accurately address their needs.I am not anti-democrat. I do not associate with any party. I choose to ignore the "battles" of "party" politics.Personally... it makes me sick when the news and media portray the passing of a piece of legislation as a "victory" for one party or the other.I realize I may have grammar issues above. I don't care.If I could add a second tag it would be Anti Professional Politician, but for the sake of this debate Anti Obama will do.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Obama was not a good choice. I can only give him credibility when he can guarantee that has sat down and read all 1000+ pages of the health care legislation he is pushing so intently.He is pushing legislation, which is different from advocating any specific bill. When the representatives finish debating and come to some kind of concession, a bill will be proposed for legislation, voted on and the President will then review it, sign on or veto it for another round of debate. It would be pointless for the President to read all of the bills before they are up for legislation.Only when a politician reaches out to the public divulging every detail of how legislation will work and can then explain in detail how any random citizen's particular situation will be affected, will they gain my respect.Which is impossible until a bill has been finalized and voted on in the legislative branch. Until then there are no details of "THE bill" to plop out. Obama so far has been doing what he's supposed to be doing: talk about what his agenda is for the bill that is being debated and formed in the legislature, and correcting or clarifying misconceptions about what is being proposed by his administration.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Thinking of the election that was placed you either had to choose from a very old republican canadiate who pretty much followed the steps of bush which probably would not work. Also god forbid if mccain died and palin was president thats a disaster. On the other hand you had a very liberal president and people wanted change and they need it. But now Obama is now president and the media settled down on having a BLACK president (correction half black no1 ever picks that up) implying that does not make me racist only aware. Now America really hasn't all and all changed. The Economy sucks still. Unemployment is up. Foreclosure is up. I mean I give Obama credit he has good ideas but they suck if not putting them to action. Also Bush lost the respect of many foreign countries. Then Obama killed not for personality but just for his race and how a half black man controls a country were the majority is white.........
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

The Economy sucks still. Unemployment is up. Foreclosure is up. I mean I give Obama credit he has good ideas but they suck if not putting them to action. When Obama took office we were losing on average 700,000 jobs per month. Now we've leveled off gaining some and losing some month to month. The reason Obama has not done as much as he wanted is because since he took office Republicans have raped the filibuster rule. Prior to Obama being president the most any party had used the filibuster in the history of the Senate in one year was around a hundred. Last year Republicans filibustered over 200 times. That is the only reason he hasn't had as much as he would like done. That's not his fault.And every president since Nixon except Bush Jr has wanted to pass a healthcare bill. Every single one. Obama has been the only President able to, and that in itself is going to put him on par with some great presidents. And once this psychotic tea party pout fest ends and republicans come to their senses and start compromising on things, he'll be able to bring the economy the rest of the way back as well.Of course though in 6 years Republicans will just elect another frat boy or actor to ruin all the hard democratic work again ><
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

When Obama took office we were losing on average 700,000 jobs per month.The economy hit the trough of it's business cycle, and by suggesting Obama stopped the downward spike has no truth. Last year Republicans filibustered over 200 times.Where is your link of proof?Of course though in 6 years Republicans will just elect another frat boy or actor to ruin all the hard democratic work againRonald Reagan had to clean up the mess after Jimmy Carter.Bill Clinton wasn't a frat boy. He admitted to the use of marijuana in college.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

The economy hit the trough of it's business cycle, and by suggesting Obama stopped the downward spike has no truth.Right wingers who claim to be independent like yourself have been doing this for decades. When the economy is bad when it's Regan or Bush in office it's a business cycle, when it's Obama or Carter it's their fault.Where is your link of proof?Here's a great article on the unprecedented obstruction of government linkAnd here are loads of stories about the record number of filibusters. Google either "Republican filibuster 2009 or 2010", they are breaking their own record linkRonald Reagan had to clean up the mess after Jimmy Carter.Bill Clinton wasn't a frat boy. He admitted to the use of marijuana in college.Ronald Regan was the first to triple the national debt, and began us down the road of deregulation which is the primary reason we today are in such a deep recession. And I wasn't talking about Clinton, he was economically perhaps the best president in our history, Bush Jr. is the frat boy.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

I am anti-Obama. I am not racist, nor do I agree with the comments made about him being only half black. However, some of his slogans and policies worry me. National healthcare (and I know that this is overused) is a good example. Government-run banks are a good example. Government-run anything that was privately owned before Obama came to office is a good example. I'm not saying that he is going to be the one that sends America into socialism. He may be a fluke, or he may be just the first step into the fears of the majority of American people.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

"I am anti-Obama. I am not racist,"im anti-obama because I'm racsit (not to all blacks just to him because he's black) why cant he go back to the country his parents came from and become leader over there
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

wow, you folks are f'ing sick.the guy can prove his citizenship probably more than almost every birther out there. a Birth Certificate, Driver's license, passport, credentialed by the Illinois and US Senate, political enemies in position to know (Republican Governor and Director of Department of Health in Hawaii supported McCain) say Obama's long form is on file, the candidates he ran against with many investigators both agree he was born in Hawaii and the Hillary camp even found 2 newspaper articles published in Hawaii newspapers announcing his birth within 10 days of it happeningAnd the evidence for the other side -  they said the birth certificate wasn't public when it was said it was forged til it was authenticated produced a birth certificate that easily shown to be forged cut off the youtube video of a phone call to Obama's step grandmother to make it seem like she didn't say he was born in Hawaii when she did and once all those don't panout they keep tryingthey start with what they want to be true and then try to make evidence - just like you. "im anti-obama because I'm racsit"the country his parents came fromPS - his mother was from Kansas and grand-father fought in WWII - dumbsh*t
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

If McCain were also young and black he would be siting in the oval office right now, the media decided that election.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

No, if McCain were young and black he never would have been elected to senate in Arizon all those years ago, and so never had the chance to run. Besides you know damn well that a black person cannot win a Republican primary... least you should know that.And that aside, Obama was elected because he had a better message, and the last republican president sucked. He won by a lot, way more than 17% and you realize black people only make up around 17% of the population right?The fact is, he was a better candidate, and the reason he won by so much is because so many people came out to vote. That's just a fact. Like with Clinton before, anytime there is a large turn out the democrat wins, because the democratic platform makes more sense and works better and has been shown to work better historically, and when you get the non-politicals excited enough about voting to actually look at issues without political bias they vote democratic.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Obama was elected because he had a better messageA false one.and you realize black people only make up around 17% of the population right?I never claimed that the black vote won his the election, I claimed the media won it. anytime there is a large turn out the democrat wins, because the democratic platform makes more senseNo, it's because most people are stupid and will only vote when a candidate has massive support from the media.non-politicalsYou mean people who don't care or keep up with politics and have no clue who they're voting for. actually look at issues without political bias they vote democraticNo, they look only at the individuals without looking at politics. I'm sure Obama is a good neighbor, I just disagree greatly with his politics.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

1. Well, he's trying. We now have ended military involvement in Iraq like he said, he passed healthcare like he said, we've ramped up involvement in Afghanistan like he said, and the economy has improved somewhat - not as fast as anyone would like, but it has improved.2. Yeah you did, you said if McCain was black and young he'd be in office. This means being black would be one of the prerequisites. I explained why it was not. And as Fox mentions every 10 minutes more people watch fox, and fox has done nothing but demonize Obama from day 1 so by right media's own admission the idea of media choosing the president is logically impossible.3. same as above. And both the Clinton elections and the Obama election had hundreds of thousands more voters than any Republican election in decades. The numbers say I'm correct.4. It's my experience that those who "disagree with his politics" like prayerfails below is lost in a sea of right wing blogs and fox and actually have no idea what Obama's politics really are. You're going to have to prove a specific issue in some debate in order for me to buy this argument.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

Well, he's tryingWith little results. We now have ended military involvement in Iraq like he saidOne of the few things I approve of him, but if Iraq falls into the sorry state Afghanistan is now I'll blame him almost exclusively.he passed health care like he saidWe will see if it was a good idea.and the economy has improved somewhatIn a recession, this is not the place to "somewhat" do what you said you would do.I explained why it was notBeing black won't only win over the black votes. And both the Clinton elections and the Obama election had hundreds of thousands more voters than any Republican election in decadesExactly, he attracts not only people who actually believe in the Democrat's politics but also with no clue.It's my experience that those who "disagree with his politics" like prayerfails below is lost in a sea of right wing blogs and foxAnd it;s my experience that those who voted for Obama did so only because of his image and not his politics.
Debate: Obama
Side: Pro obama

Point by point:1. Only because republicans have broken the country's record of filibuster 2 years in a row now. That's like blaming a fireman for running into a burning building but not being able to save everyone in it.2. Of course you will, after all it was his fault we went there right... oh wait he was one of the few senators to vote against the war to start with ><3. True. And it will be shown if anything that the bill should have gone further.4. It took almost 10 years to pull out of the great depression. We hit the peak of the second worst recession in our history only 2 years ago.5. The vast majority of people do not vote based on color, and just as many people would automatically not vote for a black person based on the color of their skin as they would for. You're logic is still retarded. Bill Clinton won, he was a democrat, he wasn't black. Jesse Jackson ran once, he didn't win, he is black. Only those obsessed with race are clueless enough to actually believe race had anything to do with it.6. Hm, I would say judging by the previous president's performance compared to Bill Clinton's performance that it is the Republicans who suddenly show up for elections who have no clue.7. Then you have little experience in the matter. I for example seem to be much more aware of this sort of thing and I voted for Obama.
Debate: Obama
Side: Anti Obama

And that aside, Obama was elected because he had a better message, and the last republican president sucked.Apparently, most want socialism and don't even know it.Of course, suggesting the last president sucked is coming from a bias liberal.