azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

If you give me the name of a city near you, I can tell you the closest museum near you that has transitional fossils on display. Pretty much every museum of which has a fossil hall has transitional fossils, and even a lot which don't will occasionally have an exhibit with transitional fossils on display, or a facsimile of a rarer fossil.But this is so easy, I don't even have to do it for you. Google "transitional fossil museum" and your town or local CBD, and I guarantee that you'll find a fossil that you can look at with your own eyes.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

The theory of evolution is at best an idea about history and prehistory, not observable science. If evolution is occurring now, it's moving too slowly to be studied and verified. If it happened in history we cannot go back in time to observe it, so how can we prove it's scientific authenticity for sure? We can't, so right now it remains an unprovable, unscientific theory.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

It's not even a theory, it's a hypothesis and a waste of time trying to twist every scientific discovery to fit the hypothesis.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Have you read 1984, Mr. Thought Police? What the fuck are you doing on a debate site if you can't handle having someone question your beliefs?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

what are you? what kind of pervert are you? What did you evolve into?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

another foul mouth punk. wonderful............................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

have you read about people getting punched in the mouth when they spit fighting words in somebody's face?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So you're a member of the Thought Police, you have a strange aversion to words like "fuck", your an internet tough guy, and you are obsessed with controlling those around you.Anything else I'm missing?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I don't think I should be reading your garbage.............................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Yeah, I might be the devil here to trick you into going to hell. Don't worry bud, intolerance is a sin too. looks like you'll be joining me in the fire.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

yeah, you're a foul mouth punk and I see no reason to read your stuff
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

sounds like want to get kicked out you foul mouth punk .
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Theory; Hypothesis, those are intellectual thought processes. Unproven fiction is entertainment. Funny, what some people take seriously. Oh, well, to each his own.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You CANNOT justify yourself for living, that is why you are DYING. You are CORRUPT, stuck in CORRUPTION, and CONDEMNED to HELL if you do not obtain God's PARDON.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

it is quite difficult to say if evolution is science or a religion . Starting off with , evolution is a theory which states that we evolved from tiny creatures . While scientists claim that we evolved from tiny cells ( microorganisms). Different religions have different teachings. Let's take the case of Christianity. Christianity says that there were two people Adam and Eve on earth, and by them we came . While Islam doesn't believe in evolution as well . No abramanic religions believe . While Sikhism doesn't have a point to make in any of the two matters . But Sikhs believe in recarnation which doesn make since and can relatively go with evolution as well . Every religion believes in their own respective teachings
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

No. But the STUDY of it is! If some people studied it as much as they study ancient fiction, they might learn something.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Evolution is a lie. Creation is truth. Science is finding the truth. Evolution isn't science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

The answer is both yes or no depending on what you mean by evolution if you mean sub-species variation like Darwin's experiments of course it is science it is what we observe it is fact now the theory of evolution itself making claims such as the origin of life and the species-species or genus-genus evolution cannot be observed and lies under historical science to be debated. Now theories can be scientific however evolution does not provide bedrock penetrating arguments for its factual claim. If you want to find the truth for yourself go search and be open minded you will find it. I first came in an Evolutionist and came out a Creationist. Good luck!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

In part it is and in part it isn't Creation DID jump into existence on DAY 5 and DAY 6Evolution has several components that are correct. Evolution combining Astronomy, Archeology, Biology, etc... But even in Evolution's own claims, there is blanks that are positioned for expanding knowledge. Why? Because there is much FAITH also NEEDED in Evolution. It still takes believing in a hypothesis, but you become dumb though when the hypothesis keeps from learning because what can be learned and needs to be learned doesn't fit the model that's trying to be proved. But Adaptation is not the same as Evolving to a different species Man wasn't an ape, even if our structures are "similar." Man was likely hunched over with wider jaws that changed with adaptation But still not EVER an ape. The earth is probably millions of years old, and there was likely a cataclysmic event in space that placed the earth where it is today. That event was an act of a Creator Days 1, 2, 3, and 4 where Not likely 24 hoursTime was created ON DAY 4 DAY 5 was the 1st recorded 24 hour DAY in Genesis. In Genesis 2 through Genesis 4 the details of the creation story are expanded, to give a detailed account of the days. • http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/1.htm• http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/2.htm• http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/3.htm• http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/4.htmThe author of Genesis documented creation in a highly intelligent order from Day 1 to completion.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

One of the evidences for billions of years is distant starlight. Trying to have growing plants, etc without a sun or time doesn't get around this problem since the stars were created on the same day as the sun and moon.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

How do you know the age in comparison? Couldn't the earth be older than thought to be or visa versa? Is all data you have conclusive fact? If so, show me.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

There are several fields of study which show that the earth & universe are far older than 6,000 years.Here is a place to start.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I didn't at all day the Earth was 6000 years old. I said a lot of things but not that
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

What are you saying with these then:"We are in the final days. I have no doubt. The earth is tired 6000 years, it's ready for its rest Day 7"-ref"we are at 2235 years from Adam at 0. We then add 400 years, since Bible clearly states that Israel was in Egypt. Final estimate of Exodus is 2635 from Adam at age 0."-ref"in 6000 years 75 % of Bible Prophesies have been fulfilled"-ref"I don't think we all had a clear idea of the text, but now in the 6 the Day, and the 6000th year He is revealing more as our time on concludes."-ref"I'm inclined to think they made forms like the neanderthal, and mixed in with people made in God's image. Since 6000 years ago is when signs of intelligent life and societies can be found. So cave men to image of God."-ref"Which also makes sense since after an exact time frame of 6000 years, the earth seems to be vomiting man and creature, and the account of 6 days being a typology of term as well as an account of creation"-ref"Genesis says the Nephilim were before and after the flood. What if before it was so heavily saturated by corrupted seed we wouldn't have lasted for the 6000 years?"-ref
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Explain to me how they found a trilobite stepped on by a human
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

They didn't.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

No, the theory of evolution has always been a mystery to me. I dont understand how we humans couldve cime from fish or what many say even an amoeba. So no evolution isnt science because it makes no sense.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You understand all of science except for evolution?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Yes, precisely it just makes no sense to me how us humans could have possibly come from a more primitive species
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

That's impressive. How long have you studied to understand the entirety of science?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Evolution is a Religion.I am a Christian. Christianity is a religion.Christianity states that in the beginning was God.Evolution states that in the beginning there was a big bang.So I believe in the beginning God and evolutionists believe in the beginning dirt.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Evolution makes no mention of a big bang. The theory of evolution is different than the big bang theory. That's why they have 2 different names.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

If evolution is a religion then aren't you afraid the evo-god is going to leave you like this as a monkey?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Evolution has nothing whatsoever to do with the big bang. It only describes the process by which life diversified, not the process by which it emerged. Also, religions require a deity or supernatural doctrine. Evolution has neither of those things. It literally cant be a religion because its missing all the necessary components of a religion
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Evolution is the or a key component of the religion of Naturalism, in which you believe nature justifies your life so you are exempt from Hell. To say it has nothing to do with belief in the big bang or abiogenesis is dishonest, they all kiss each other in today's perverted sciences which basically are designed to allow for sexual perversion with no objective basis of morality.The deity of evolution is material, nature, and your own mind which in evolutionary religion is believed to be nothing but chemical fizzes causing a hologram of you which is self-justified making you exempt from Hell, so you (even though it's not really you in your belief but rather is a manifestation of chemical fizzes) are equal to nature and are your personal contact point of your deity which is nature, hence the religion of Naturalism. And what a stupid deity you serve, one which gives life no real value or meaning, no real purpose, and holds you chained to death. Pitiful religion you have there.I understand evolution better than you do.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Naturalism is the natural conclusion from all of science. We have yet to discover anything supernatural. Why would we assume that any supernatural thing exists? Everything we have ever measured or investigated is natural. Also naturalism isnt a religion. Its a conclusion derived from observing the evidence we have available to us. It doesnt have nothing to do with the big bang and abiogenesis. Obviously you can show where those things link up. But you were saying abiogenesis IS evolution.Which it is not. And what the hell do they have to do with sexual perversion? Also, of course there is no objective basis for morality. Why would we acknowledge that when it doesnt exist? You actually have to prove an objective morality exists.material, nature, and our own minds are not supernatural. A deity is supernatural. Evolution is not a religion as it has no supernatural component.nature and are your personal contact point of your deity which is nature, hence the religion of Naturalism. And what a stupid deity you serve, one which gives life no real value or meaning, no real purpose, and holds you chained to death. Pitiful religion you have there.Its a stupid deity because it isnt a deity. There is no deity in evolution. There is no doctrine in evolution. Evolution is not a religion. Not even close. But at least its true unlike your phony god you cant even prove exists.I understand evolution better than you do.The only thing youve demonstrated is how poorly you understand evolution.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

So you believe that your consciousness is a manifestation of non-living matter, and that is supernatural because nature by itself has no consciousness. To say you have not discovered anything supernatural is a silly attempt to deny your own existence. Try looking in a mirror while you pour hot coffee on your head and maybe you will see that you are real and not just matter fizzing causing an apparition which really is not you.Your logic is nonsense........no logic at all, only hoping you escape justice in death and that's silly.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Why would you conclude that a living being thinks that his consciousness isn't part of himself? He didn't say anything like that. Also, how you can you conclude that nature doesn't have any consciousness when humans are a part of nature? You aren't supernatural. Looking into a mirror shows the natural world.Your argument is purely fallacious. Don't pretend like you used logic.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

This is so dumb. You believe non-living matter caused life, so non-living matter would have supernatural powers and then you claim you believe in nothing supernatural. You believe consciousness rose out of mindless matter again making matter to be supernatural, and you still say you do not believe in anything supernatural.Atheists are either completely fooling themselves or they are purposely deviant. I think it's both...the Bible really has little to say about atheist...just says they are fools and corrupt and have done abominable things.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I understand evolution better than you do.Why haven't you ever stated any facts about evolution then?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Was I talking to you, Fartman?...............................................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Is there anything else you don't believe in that you know better than the people who believe in it? Do you use actual facts when discussing those topics?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

A fact of evolution is that you, in reality are nothing more than a monkey and have no real purpose for existing. Evolution wants you dead, and you are loving it. Give evolution a hug, fool.I'm sure this will provoke a slew of stupid statements as you fume in your desire to justify yourself outside of Hell.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

A fact of the Bible is that you, in reality are nothing more than an insignificant toy to God. God wants you dead, and you are loving it. Give God a hug before He sends you to Hell, fool.You are foolish to think that a strawman argument that comes nowhere close to anything that evolution says would cause anyone to fume.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Nope, sorry Fartman, I know God loves me and I know He loves you, but you want to believe God does not love you, and I have to wonder if anybody loves you.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Nope,Actually, yes. Since we are going by the notion that anyone is allowed to describe the belief system of someone else, I am as accurate about your beliefs as you are about mine.I know God loves meYour version of God loves you because you think you are God.but you want to believe God does not love youFalse. I want God to exist and to love us all. I have looked and looked for evidence of this. It isn't there.and I know He loves you,and I have to wonder if anybody loves you.You just admitted to being an atheist. :)
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You deny that God loves you. Plain and simple. So who does love you?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So, you admit that I am right about God not loving me. Welcome to the atheist club.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Why is atheism authoritative in academic denial of God, when multidisciplinary studyies show atheism underdeveloped, bias, and academically unreliable?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

The fuck are you talking about? There is no "Academic denial of god". That isnt a thing. Science doesnt even concern itself with the question of god. Science can only investigate things that are falsifiable and god is not falsifiable. And id love to see what these "multidisciplinary studies" are because it sounds like a crock of shit. How the fuck is atheism "underdeveloped"? what does that even mean? Bias? No shit everyone has bias. Its literally unavoidable so thats meaningless. And academically unreliable? Yes because we all know how totally reliable religion has been in advancing academics, technology, and science. Just look up a bible verse and boom theres schematics for a computer. Actual studies have shown on average atheists have higher IQs, score higher on scientific literacy tests, and even score higher on religious knowledge tests. And i can actually cite those for you. http://aattp.org/new-study-shows-that-atheists-have-higher-iqs-and-self-esteem-than-religious-people/ http://www.pewforum.org/2010/09/28/u-s-religious-knowledge-survey/ http://phys.org/news/2015-12-worldwide-survey-religion-science-scientists.html
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Here is evidence!Will you look? You ask for evidence, then you don't look!https://youtu.be/EQbrEGP2NAc82 scientist got together with mathmatical equations and developed a list of minimal required expectations, and scientific properties that would have to exist or have occurred in order to have any reasonable expectations of the existence of alien life. We exist by miracle! Science proves God!https://youtu.be/EQbrEGP2NAc
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I don't dignify foul mouths like that sin-bag. The guy is dirty. If people can't speak decently they are not worth reading. You won't get anywhere with Ava....he wants proof that Hell is real and he's waiting for it.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

We exist by 100% guarantee. Our universe allows for stars which allow for planets and planets in the hospitable zone. With billions of glaxies each with billions of suns each with billions of planets its nearly guaranteed that at least one would be earth and host carbon based life. Try again.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I looked at one of your links. So they define self esteem by education. The most educated person in the world doesn't equal self esteem. Everything is self defining, so if you have to be the most educated, the most powerful, the biggest man on campus, or in life ... is that self esteem? Or is self esteem someone who is sure enough of their own value and worth the can have others shine without crumbling? And stand on things they know to be true against the tide? Which really has greater self esteem?.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

No. Just no.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

If an animal develops mutations, is there any beneficial ones?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Yes, there are beneficial mutations.e.g.:"Another mutation of E. coli facilitated amino acid catabolism under starvation conditions, enabling the mutant to outcompete the parental wild-type. This increased catabolism resulted from a genomic rearrangement (Figure 3). The first step of this rearrangement was insertion of an indigenous IS5 element between the promoter and a CRP-binding site (catabolite regulatory protein) of the starvation inducible cstA gene."and:"Hence, certain environmental conditions seem to favor bacteria with specific genes duplicated. This may have provided the organism a temporary increase in gene expression of those duplicated genes, which apparently helped the organism cope with the higher temperature."https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/mutations/a-creationist-perspective-of-beneficial- mutations-in-bacteria/ See also:here and here
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

The genome of a creature is programmed to respond to environmental changes within limits. That is not mutation, it is adaptation. The fact that a lot of people have developed dark skin does not mean they have evolved differently from idiots like you. The variations that express themselves are not additional DNA in the genome.Your making a huge leap of cartoon animated beliefs without evidence to imply that such changes result in little swimmy critters morphing into people gradually or suddenly at any point in time or over huge spans of times during millions of years.This whole argument a few of you buffoons are making trying to equate adaptation with evolution is just a smokescreen attempting to hide the fact that you believe in evolution while never being able to see it happen and nobody has ever seen it happen....because it does not happen, adaptation is not evolution.........and why should you care anyways, you think you are as good as God so you cannot be in Hell as a sinner.......like you said, you don't care, so why do you want to argue about it? I think you are a liar, full of doubletalk, fooling yourself into believing you are exempt from Hell.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Those mutations are not evolution, they are adaptations which the genome is programmed for. Why don't you read that entire article? The article fully supports what I am saying and contradicts from beginning to end belief in evolution. Evolution is a belief, it is not science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Those mutations are not evolution, they are adaptations which the genome is programmed for.Maybe you should provide your definition for evolution...Mine:Evolution = mutations + heredity (mutations can be passed on to the next generation) + selection (some mutations fair better than others in a given environment)
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You cannot show one kind of animal mutating into another kind of animal. It does not happen. If you want to believe it happens, you can believe it. That's not science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

A) define kind.B) Is the Coelacanth the same kind as the Eusthenopteron - if not, why not; is the Eusthenopteron the same kind as the Panderichthys - if not, why not;is the Panderichthys the same kind as Tiktaalik - if not, why not;is the Tiktaalik the same kind as Acanthostega - if not, why not;is the Acanthostega the same kind as Ichthyostega - if not, why not;is the Ichthyostega the same kind as Tolerpeton - if not, why not;
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Your brainwashed into equating beliefs in evolution with science. You cannot see evolution, it's not science, it's a belief system in which you claim your hypothesis is fact without being able to see it happening.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Is a dog the same kind of animal as a cat? You cannot show a dog morphing into a cat or a primate morphing into a man except in cartoon animations and that's comedy, not science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Is a dog the same kind of animal as a cat? Yes they are both mammals and have 4 legs.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

and you are the same kind of animal as a monkey, both with jump on my back to draw attention to themselves, monkeyman
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Yep. Monkeys and humans have similarities too. Well done for finally learning what evolution is.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Since you are the one making up the definition of "kind", you will have to tell me.Is the dog the same kind as the wolf, or the fox?Is the zebra the same kind as the horse, the moose, the deer?Is the Coelacanth the same kind as the Eusthenopteron;is the Eusthenopteron the same kind as the Panderichthys;is the Panderichthys the same kind as the Tiktaalik;is the Tiktaalik the same kind as the Acanthostega;is the Acanthostega the same kind as the Ichthyostega;is the Ichthyostega the same kind as the Tolerpeton;primate morphing into a man except in cartoonAre these fossils cartoons?