azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Please realize that Fox news is not a credible source. Could you please provide a source for this definition? Communism (from Latin communis - common, universal) is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless[1][2] and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order.[3] This movement, in its Marxist–Leninist interpretations, significantly influenced the history of the 20th century, which saw intense rivalry between the "socialist world" (socialist states ruled by communist parties) and the "western world" (countries with capitalist economies).[4] Marxist theory holds that pure communism or full communism is a specific stage of historical development that inevitably emerges from the development of the productive forces that leads to a superabundance of material wealth, allowing for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely associated individuals.[5][6] The exact definition of communism varies, and it is often mistakenly, in general political discourse, used interchangeably with socialism; however, Marxist theory contends that socialism is just a transitional stage on the road to communism. Leninism adds to Marxism the notion of a vanguard party to lead the proletarian revolution and to secure all political power after the revolution for the working class, for the development of universal class consciousness and worker participation, in a transitional stage between capitalism and communism. Council communists and non-Marxist libertarian communists and anarcho-communists oppose the ideas of a vanguard party and a transition stage, and advocate for the construction of full communism to begin immediately upon the abolition of capitalism. There is a very wide range of theories amongst those particular communists in regards to how to build the types of institutions that would replace the various economic engines (such as food distribution, education, and hospitals) as they exist under capitalist systems—or even whether to do so at all. Some of these communists have specific plans for the types of administrative bodies that would replace the current ones, while always qualifying that these bodies would be decentralised and worker-owned, just as they currently are within the activist movements themselves. Others have no concrete set of post-revolutionary blueprints at all, claiming instead that they simply trust that the world's workers and poor will figure out proper modes of distribution and wide-scale production, and also coordination, entirely on their own, without the need for any structured "replacements" for capitalist state-based control.Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

Saying China isn't communist is kind of like saying China isn't chinese.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

You have valid points, but the name of the ruling party doesn't mean anything at all. China is state-capitalist.When looking at China, we see government, and complete private, or state control of the means of production. A pretty far cry from Communism don't you think?
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Well thank you. You may have a point. Was just reading this: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/07/how_communist_is_china.html
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Child exploitation is horrifying and countries like the United States should speak out against child labor.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

Well, Capitalists aren't whom are using child labor. It would be Fascist/quasi-socialist regimes like China.Capitalism, in its Free-Market form (what most self-described Capitalists tend to support) is a system of free trade/market/enterprise. The people have a right to work for whomever they wish. There is no government interference in the market.Now, is child labor possible under a free market? Of course. However, that would be by a voluntary whim. As well, child labor is hardly useful in a developed Western nation. Often times the only child labor would exist in family owned businesses or paper boys and small stuff like that. Child labor is more useful overseas in developing nations where people are poor and oppressed. This is why it is so prevalent (and even forced) in China. China allows trade with outside "Capitalsit" countries, and even fortifies most of its most low of labor into children. this is due to strict regulation in America and Western Nations that forces businesses to try and send their production elsewhere. In the States, Child labor would be possible without regulation, but not nearly what it is in China, where even the government itself uses children.Child labor itself is not a bad thing. Exploitation and tyranny is. Often times, that exploitation and tyranny can drift into child labor, muddying the waters. In a nation where the people are free to make their own decisions, people naturally don't like a business that puts children into such terrible work camps. However in China, where government has made it common practice, the people there don't care and have learned helplessness.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Fascism and communism are two different things. China is communist, not fascist. Educate yourself, please.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

As a matter of fact, China is neither really Communist nor Fascist. It is State Capitalist. In a way this can be compared to Fascism.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Fascism and communism are still two different things. .
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

I don't think you understand much about the philosophies or Chinese economics.Long story short, China is extremely authoritarian and controls pretty much all aspects of the economy. What makes it NOT Communist is because it does allow for private property and the pursuit of enterprise. It isn't China, specifically, that trades with other countries all the time. It is many private businesses within China. This would be closer to Fascism. Fascism allows for private property but still has total control of the economy (as in, China can tell you to do something with your business and you can't say 'no'). China was at one time Communist, but in opening itself to trade it has lowered its authoritarian hold over the people by a slight amount.As well, Communism differs in application. If Communism was by what Marx envisioned, even the USSR would not be considered "truly communist." Fascism applies third way economics, mixing socialism with capitalism. This is what the West does, some leaning more toward Capitalism (America) others leaning away (France, Spain). None of the countries are fully Socialist, Capitalist, Communist, Fascist, etc.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

You are wrong. Fascism, communism and socialism are three different things. I know because I am a socialist, but I am not a communist or a fascist.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

Socialism varies on application, like all the other systems. What differentiates Socialism from Communism and Fascism is that Socialism, over time, has been specifically an economic system, while Communism has been a philosophy proposed by Marx (who used the term interchangeably with Socialism), and Fascism is a Nationalistic philosophy that applies variants of Socialism into its economics (however, like I said, Fascism applies Third Way Economics, not COMPLETE Socialism.)If you are a State Socialist, you would support all goods and services to be distributed by the State. As well, this would mean that you support that all employment is by the State. How the hiring process works is up to the leaders.If you are an Anarcho-Socialist, you would support a Collective cooperation of free people that avoids land ownership. Things would be mostly distributed fairly, but no one would "own" the means to production. It would be owned by entire communities, decided based on Direct Democracy.Communism, as proposed by Marx, supports Anarcho-Socialism as the futuristic utopia. The State would only be necessary to fairly redistribute all the wealth. Once this wealth is redistributed, the state would be unnecessary and the people would be able to continue Socialism without a government. It would be post-monetarist and post-materialistic because the people would learn to live without pursuing their own self-interest that is beyond common need.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

I prefer democratic socialism. .
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

People will be exploited regardless. I disagree with exploitation and poor working conditions, but child labor is perfectly acceptable given equal protections and working conditions as as adults. If the adults have them good, the children should have them good, if the adults have them bad, why should the children be excepted? (And if the adults have it bad, it's likely the children will have it bad regardless anyway)So, no, Capitalism should not stop using child labor. Though exploitation of peoples should be stopped regardless.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

The covid 19 pandaemic has triggered new ways of learning. All around the world ,educational institutions are looking toward online learning platforms to continue with the process of educating students.This is entirely new way of education that every instiution have had to adapt and it has emerged as a necessary resources for students. E-learning has been demonstrated to be effective as conventional didacticism and can be used to foster self directed learning.It ecncourages medical students to exert greater control over their learning by allowing flexibility over content and pace . E-learning computers are increasingly used and is moving from textbooks in electronic fromat to truly interactive medium that delivers the needs and meet of educational needs.learning in freee time led to better performance and higher efficiency,because e learning soft ware will enable them to revisit any information they need,whenever they need.it also help in speeding up, cost reduction, maximum knowledge retention,increasing productivity, better collabration with students .Regards Dr.Gayatri.NACME 2021 A batch.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

COVID created geographical and time barriers to education. Technology can be used to maintain learning innovative way. This crisis has given us an opportunity to disclose unexposed areas of technology-based medical education. All institutions were not equipped with infrastructure in terms of sufficient classrooms, faculty, and other academic resources. Online learning can bridge the gap and strengthen the quality of medical education as it is flexible and adaptable. The competency-based medical education document of the Medical Council of India (2018) has recognized the importance of the technology. It has included electronic means in the broad competency “Lifelong learner” committed to continuous improvement of skills and knowledge. Now it is time for adapting to the new virtual world till we get back to physically being available in our institutions again.RegardsDr.S.Vijaya kumari ACME 2021 A
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

Dr Santosh Bhosale2020bProposeThe Corona pandemic has pushed the population of the world into unprecedented catastrophy dirsupting the regular rythm of education making the students and professors homebound in lockdown, but the world has to move along and find the silver lining, medical education is no difference, we have to find a way to come out of it and focus on medical education as doctors are corona worriors on the battlefieldI propose e learning to tackle the lack of human contact and interaction in medical education.1. E-learning is a new norm and effective in certain way to convet theorotical knowledge to students at their door step2. The younger generation is tech-savy and competent to follow the e-platform3. In E-learning there are different modules which can be utilised to impart the specific lteaching & learning techniques4. Its a ray of hope where learning never stops and knowledge disposal is there round the clock5. Students require interaction and confidence building in these tough times through e-learning6. E-learning is fruitful at least in this lockdown if not in future, it maintains the momentum7. ACME online workshop for both 2020 B & 2021 A batches is a great example of e-learning and learning should never stopRegardsDr.Santosh Bhosale 2020 B Batch
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

• Thanks to technology, e-learning is now made possible. Many students worldwide can now access all kinds of courses online without leaving the comfort of their homes. They are given opportunities to learn from competent educators and interact with other students from different locations.• Advantages of E-learning• 1. Saves time and money• One of the most obvious advantages of e-learning is that you can save time and money. You can manage your schedule and take online courses at your most convenient time, whether early in the morning, late afternoon, or evening. You save money, too, because you don’t have to pay for transportation or worry about eating on the go.• 2. Better retention• E-learning makes use of different platforms like Pedagogue, which provides interactive content. Also, you can share your thoughts and opinions with others. The more engaging the lessons, the more students can remember the information.• 3. Personalized learning• You can choose your learning path and study at your own pace. You become more motivated and invested in the course.• 4. Cost-effective• Students aren’t the only ones that can save money in e-learning. Many educational institutions save money through this set-up because there’s no need to use a physical classroom, which translates to reduced monetary spending.• 5. Environment-friendly• E-learning is also more environmentally friendly because it doesn’t contribute to the pollution brought about by paper productiondr.kanyaACME 2021 A bacth
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

The students belong to the internet generation where they are already into E-learning through online coaching, online examinations before entering into medical education.Online teaching is the correct choice in the present situation amid lockdowns and need to maintain social distancing.Even though it is new to some faculty they can be trained through FDP(faculty development programs)and also have access to various LMS software.In E-learning the learners have control over the content, learning sequence, pace of learning and time.E-learning is flexible, cost effective and convenient.NMC advocates self directed learning in Andragogy and E-learning is instrumental in promoting SDL. One can make use of various learning platforms as VLE (virtual learning environments),video streaming services, visual instructor-lead training (VILT),Discussion boards, Forums, Podcasts for CBL,WPBL, interactive learning.Through web- based OSCE and video technology the performance based skills as decision making can be taught and evaluated.E- learning creates opportunities for critical thinking and encourages them to reexamine their beliefs and attitudes thus making them more willing to accept and imbibe the content. The availability of 4G internet at low cost had made online teaching accessible to students from remote areas.The teachers can prepare their own teaching module to meet their objectives using LMS.They can evaluate competencies through online assessments, give feedback to the students for self improvement.We are conducting online sessions for our students since 1 year and are having a positive response from them.In this era of Artificial Intelligence and robotic surgeries we need to make the teachers and students efficient in using the online techniques and E-learning is the best way to begin with.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

Dr. M.V.Sailaja from 2020B BatchRespected DOME faculty and co-learners,I am hereby rebut to statement made by Dr. Umesh Ramadurg - "Lack of flexibility:E-learning can be great for learning specific skills and for knowledge that needs to be transferred. However, with more complex skills and competencies, it is more difficult to put together an effective e-learning programme."I hereby submit my views:1. E-learning is seen as a catalyst for applying adult learning theory, thus many medical educators are taking on the role of facilitator and assessor of competency.2. It encourages medical students to exert greater control over their learning by allowing flexibility over content and pace.3. Educators can evaluate competencies objectively through online assessments, enabling students to receive personalized feedback for self-improvement.4. It can foster self-directed learning.5. Technology is a tool for deeper learning, and learning experiences beyond lecture-based learning. With the emergence of students who have grown up with technology, e-learning may increase. 6. In an era of value for money, e-learning offers an opportunity to disseminate the experience of clinicians to a wide audience.With Regards,Dr. M.V.Sailaja,ACME 2020B.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

Dr Kuldeep Dabade Batch 2020 B ProposeI propose E learning for the following reasons in view of current COVID-19 pandemic1. Flexibility and ease of access: E-learning is not fixed or time bound to a particular schedule and is very easily accessible, so learners can choose a place and time of their own liking. Teachers can also update and edit the learning material at their own convenience. The accessibility of the content via small size of the gadgets, mostly hand-held, also complements this feature.2. Cosmopolitan nature: E-learning has been found to be useful in remote and rural areas as well. The participants may actually belong to any part of the globe. Rare cases and diseases peculiar to a particular geographical area can also be studied globally.3. Time-saving: More number of students can be taken up at same time, thereby reducing the time needed for total lectures. The content once made is eternal, and can be revisited any number of times. The saved time in preparing lectures can be used by the teachers to develop their higher level of cognitive e-learning .4. Stop-gap arrangement: E-learning can be used to hone the skills before actually encountering the real patient. This decreases the probability of error and also saves time. This allows repetition, and thereby improvement in the desired skills.5. Adult learning principles: E-learning helps in deeper learning, increases self-motivation, and fulfils the adult learning principles. It also allows the participants to set their own pace as per their learning styles and can be used as best suited tool for personalized and interactive e-learning experience. It is tailored to student’s needs and is learner-centered, thus helping in self-directed learning.6. Uniformity: Since identical information is posted to all the participants, the curricula uniformity is maintained across the learners. The students posted in off-site campuses also receive identical inputs. This helps in the uniform attainment of learning objectives because of equal availability of quality and quantity of information dispersed.RegardsDr. Kuldeep J DabadeACME 2020 B batch
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

"E-Learning: educational norm in COVID times": I, Dr.Pramod Rangasubhe from Group Bloom Proposing E-Learning: The integration of e-learning into existing medical curricula should be the result of a well-devised plan that begins with a needs assessment and concludes with the decision to use e-learning, Kern (1998). Clearly, e-learning will quickly grow in all areas of medicine. Not only will it play a major role in medical universities, most likely in the form of blended learning, but it will also become a key element in post-graduate training. The reasons why I propose for E-Learning are:• Flexibility and ease of access: During this current situation of Covid pandemic, where all Universities have recommended for Online teaching, it makes teachers and Learners to use this format of teaching-learning mode flexible and easy to access. E-learning is not fixed or time bound to a particular schedule and is very easily accessible, so learners can choose a place and time of their own liking. Teachers can also update and edit the learning material at their own convenience. The accessibility of the content via small size of the gadgets, mostly hand-held, also complements this feature. • Cosmopolitan nature: E-learning is sans frontiers, and this has been found to be useful in remote and rural areas as well. All they need will be a Mobile and Internet connectivity. The participants may actually belong to any part of the globe. • Time-saving: More number of students can be taken up at same time, thereby reducing the time needed for total lectures. The content once made is eternal, and can be revisited any number of times. The saved time in preparing lectures can be used by the teachers to hone their higher level of cognitive e-learning. • Stop-gap arrangement: E-learning can be used to hone the skills before actually encountering the real patient. This decreases the probability of error and also saves time. This allows repetition, and thereby improvement in the desired skills. • Adult learning principles: E-learning helps in deeper learning, increases self-motivation, and fulfils the adult learning principles. It also allows the participants to set their own pace as per their learning styles and can be used as best suited tool for personalized and interactive e-learning experience. It is tailored to student’s needs and is learner-centered, thus helping in self-directed learning. • Uniformity: Since identical information is posted to all the participants, the curricula uniformity is maintained across the learners. The students posted in off-site campuses also receive identical inputs. This helps in the uniform attainment of learning objectives because of equal availability of quality and quantity of information dispersed.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Propose

Dr. Jayaprakash B RACME2020B_batchThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the routine learningschedule of the day-scholars. Due to COVID-19 lockdownacross the globe, the active hours the day-scholars that they would be spending in their college for learning is being spent athome which means they are left behind their routine learningactivities. These online active teaching-learning andengagement strategies, if applied for teaching, learning andassessment purposes will help our learners to continuouslyinvolve themselves in the learning process and will also fostergood study habits in them without compromising theirprofessional attitudes. All these require faculty involvement,identification of appropriate digital learning platforms,designing of educational activities and proper planning andscheduling of activities based on the proposed learningexperiences and expected learning outcomes. Thoughtechnology cannot fully substitute a good teaching or a teacherit can be used as an effective tool for actively engaging thestudents who would otherwise be missing their routine classesdue to any unprecedented disaster like COVID-19. Thesestrategies will not only help the students of medical collegesbut also all higher education institutions to effectivelyovercome the educational crisis that emerges at times ofsituation like lockdown due to public health emergencies or anyother disaster for this matter.