azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

hitler is too evil. he don't deserve to live in the world. he's bad .. :(
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I doubt anyone can ever explain why some people take pleasure in torturing and murdering others. There are many theories, psychologists refer to it sometimes as the 'mad versus bad' debate.I don't think Hitler was insane. He knew what he was doing, and he knew it was wrong, that much is clear given the way many of the meetings to 'design' the concentration camps and the 'final solution' were held in secret. Also, Hitler functioned rationally enough to appear in public, to hold mass rallies, to attend meetings, to travel, and so on.So clearly he wasn't mad. What he did have, though, was a pathological hatred of Jews. It was totally irrational. So, he was sane, but filled with hate.Finally, my own personal opinion is that some people ARE 'evil'. After all, surely evil is, as evil does?Hitler planned and orchestrated the deaths of HALF THE JEWS ON OUR PLANET. Six million innocent children, women and men.He also murdered millions of non Jews. He was a mass murderer.The man was evil. Sometimes the simple explanation is the right one.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Hitler just wanted to take revenge on the jews as he felt that as the army is fighting a war, the jews did not help them despite being rich and all.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler hated the Jews a lot. Hence, he forbade the intermarriage of Jews and Germans. He began to take measures against the Jews. They were gradually not allowed to own property, banned from jobs, stripped of their German citizenship and disallowed Jews from entering public places. -Melinda Chen, Swee Yingyi.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler's plans and policies were biased towards himself and the German men. He ostracised the Jews and the women. He did not have many plans that benefited the country but Stalin introduced collectivisation, industralisation and five year plans to improve the economy of Russia. Stalin also improved the lives of Russians to an extend but Hitler was just an icon of fear to the Germans-chin li qi & tan ming xia
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin did introduce a few economic policies but generally, there was an economic slowdown. The emphasis on heavy industries neglected the people's welfare such as production of clothes, house-building etc. Also, we should not forget that there was overproduction of certain industries leading to poor quality products that can have an adverse effect on people's health.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I doubt anyone can ever explain why some people take pleasure in torturing and murdering others. There are many theories, psychologists refer to it sometimes as the 'mad versus bad' debate.I don't think Hitler was insane. He knew what he was doing, and he knew it was wrong, that much is clear given the way many of the meetings to 'design' the concentration camps and the 'final solution' were held in secret. Also, Hitler functioned rationally enough to appear in public, to hold mass rallies, to attend meetings, to travel, and so on.So clearly he wasn't mad. What he did have, though, was a pathological hatred of Jews. It was totally irrational. So, he was sane, but filled with hate.Finally, my own personal opinion is that some people ARE 'evil'. After all, surely evil is, as evil does?Hitler planned and orchestrated the deaths of HALF THE JEWS ON OUR PLANET. Six million innocent children, women and men.He also murdered millions of non Jews. He was a mass murderer.The man was evil. Sometimes the simple explanation is the right one.By darren , weicheng, seongheon.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Evil is evil. Hitler was Catholic and Stalin was an Atheist. Both murdered millions. Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union, set in motion events designed to cause a famine in the Ukraine to destroy the people there seeking independence from his rule. As a result, an estimated 7,000,000 persons perished in this farming area, known as the breadbasket of Europe, with the people deprived of the food they had grown with their own hands. Hitler came to power with the intention of eliminating the Jews from Europe; the war in the east showed that this could be achieved by mass killing. Within weeks of the attack by Germany (and its Finnish, Romanian, Hungarian, Italian, and other allies) on the USSR, Germans, with local help, were exterminating entire Jewish communities. 12,000,000 died under Hitler's reign (concentration camps and civilians deliberately killed in WWII plus 3 million Russian POWs left to die). They're both bad men, but Hitler gets the nod for more evil.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler was probably more ruthless, but neither was evil. Ultimately, they were just humans and it is both illogical and dangerous to think otherwise.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I believe Adolph Hitler was more evil than Stalin in many ways. Hitler's motives were more evil because he specifically wanted to wipe out one whole race based on their roots and their religion. His way of destroying them was evil and ruthless. You have to be a very evil person to be able to burn people alive, and keep them in concentration camps and starve them, all while having no regrets or second thoughts. Amos peh , Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler wanted to make a German Empire all throughout Europe and evidentially the world. World War II had over sixty nations involved in it. He wanted superiority over everyone in the world. Hitler wanted to wipe out an entire race. He put Jews in concentration camps. In concentration camps, Jews were tortured, gassed, used as sick experiments, shot, starved, and hung. He wasn’t going to stop until he wiped every single Jew off the face of the world. To Hitler, the Jewish race was nothing but little, annoying animals.Amos peh , Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

There are many people who Hitler hated and wanted to annihilate. Hitler wanted a pure Aryan race. This means he wanted only perfect people. The people must be tall, slender, physically fit, and free of any disability, deformity, abnormality, mental illness, and homosexuality. Above all people Hitler hated he hated the Jews the most. He firmly believed that the Jews were the inferior race. He blamed the Jews for Germany’s defeat in World War I. He believed that Germany would have never lost the war if it wasn’t for the Jews stabbing Germany in the back. In Europe at the time, Jews were known as Communists and to some people Germany was known as a Jewish Country. This was the last thing Hitler wanted his country called. Amos peh , Bryan seah
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

There are many people who Hitler hated and wanted to annihilate. Hitler wanted a pure Aryan race. This means he wanted only perfect people. The people must be tall, slender, physically fit, and free of any disability, deformity, abnormality, mental illness, and homosexuality. Above all people Hitler hated he hated the Jews the most. He firmly believed that the Jews were the inferior race. He blamed the Jews for Germany’s defeat in World War I. He believed that Germany would have never lost the war if it wasn’t for the Jews stabbing Germany in the back. In Europe at the time, Jews were known as Communists and to some people Germany was known as a Jewish Country. This was the last thing Hitler wanted his country called. Amos peh , bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler began as no more than an idle, self-deluded, uneducated young man who liked World War I army life because it gave a sense of purpose. In 1919 that suddenly changed when he discovered, as he said. "I could make a good speech." He turned out to be a bold, sharp political tactician as well, but it was his hypnosis of the masses that made him the Führer, the unchallenged leader. Nevertheless, he is paranoid & insensitive to human. Amos peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler started WWII and lost.He killed eight million Jews and undesirables and was honest about his hatred of them. Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I know Adolf Hitler is evil, just because of the sheer mass genocide that took place within the regimes....based it on a particular race, or class, of people.Not only that, he orchestrated elaborate work camps wherein people were forced to work under INHUMANE conditions.I think Hitler took it a step, further, though, as he played on Germany's economic depravation to convince an entire society to destroy an entire race of Jews. Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I still think Hitler was more evil then Stalin. Stalin may have murdered more people, but most of them were people he thought were a threat to his rule (he was paranoidXcore) Where as Hitler killed innocents for not being worthy of his new world order. I think motive makes the crime, and Stalin's political agenda is a lot less "evil" sounding then Hitlers cleansing But Hitler get's more attention for motive.Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin also killed innocent people and even horses. Stalin was paranoid too, for he killed anybody that opposed him and even planned the assasination of his rivals as well as pretending to be close to Lenin to tricked others in thinking that Stalin will most likely be the next successor instead. On the otherhand, Hitler is not ruthless enough compared to Stalin for he failed to gain support for the first time and even landed in jail. -Denise and Sohyee
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I still think Hitler was more evil then Stalin. Stalin may have murdered more people, but most of them were people he thought were a threat to his rule (he was paranoidXcore) Where as Hitler killed innocents for not being worthy of his new world order. I think motive makes the crime, and Stalin's political agenda is a lot less "evil" sounding than Hitler.But Hitler get's more attention for motive. Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

The ways which stalin used to gain political support are despicable. How he pretended to be close to Lenin to gain support is by taking away people close to Lenin, which are his competitors. He also changed photos of Trotsky to him being very close to lenin. he even told the wrong date of lenin's funeral so that Trotsky would go on the wrong day. he was trying to make people think that he was closer to Lenin than Trotsky did. This is soo evil. -Joel, Yan Yu and Marcus
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

His personal ambition, fueled by extreme racial hatred and a deranged vision, led directly to the European War and the series of atrocities later known as the Holocaust. That's Hitler.Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler rmembered deep in his heart that it was a Jewish doctor who failed to cure his mother. By 1909, he found himself in a homeless shelter and then a house for poor workers. He begged and shoveled snow for a living. He hated Jews and hence massive murder of a single racial in history.Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

On 29 Jul 1921, Hitler successfully maneuvered himself into the position of party leadership, gaining himself the infamous rank, Führer, as a result. He renamed his party to the National Socialist German Workers Party, or, the Nazi Party. Thereafter he engaged in a series of schemes to rid of his political rivals in Germany. Then in 1932, the Nazi Party became the ruling party. In 1934, Hitler declared himself as absolute ruler of German that was completely illegal in a German Constitution. Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

In 1935, Hitler publicly promoted the Nuremberg Laws, depriving German Jews of their citizenship; by 1938, the Nazi Party openly urged hooligans to destroy Jewish-owned businesses and synagogues.Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Among one of the first items Hitler engaged upon was Germany's participation in the League of Nations; specifically, his dislike of German participation. Beginning in Mar 1933, the League of Nations took up the question of firebombing, noting that it should be banned because the resulting fires was as uncontrollable as poison gas that the League of Nations had already outlawed. As the new resolution was about to be passed, Hitler announced Germany's exit from the League of Nations, throwing global politics upside down. The topic of firebombing was never passed into law, and even if it was, it would mean nothing without Germany's backing. Hitler walked away with pride that his Germany held so much power, but little did he know, his decision "ensured the death of hundreds of thousands of his own countrymen" as British and American aircraft would, ten years later, firebomb his cities.Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

After WW2 broke out in Europe, Hitler's racial persecutions intensified. Between 1939 and 1945, an estimated minimum of 11 million people were systematically brought to concentration camps and murdered. No one could ever be sure of how many innocent Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, homosexuals, and political enemies of the Nazi Party were killed in these concentration camps; some estimates ran as high as 25 million. Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler had no regards in God. He picked and chose elements of Christianity as he saw fit to aid him in his persecution of Jews and to establish his political position.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler's complete disregard for humanity, then, made his complete lack of integrity so much expected. The Sep 1939 invasion of Poland was committed while a peace treaty between Germany and Poland was still in place. Then in Jun 1941, Hitler tore up the non-aggression pact that his government had sign with Russia only a few years before, and launched Operation Barbarossa into Russia. Throughout his career as the leader of Germany, he again and again turned on those who helped him to the top, purging them out of positions of power to prevent them from challenging his position.Amos Peh & Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

The Gestapo, the Nazi's secret police force, was responsible for finding an removing threats to the Nazi Party as well as to the Nazi state. By 1937, the police especially the Gestapo had unlimited powers of arrest. People could be taken into custody just based on the suspicion that they MIGHT commit a crime. Many Germans were arrested and put into concentration camps without a trial. The Gestapo used torture, murder, arrests and dirty tactics such as blackmail to stifle opposition to Hitler. The Gestapo became feared throughout Germany and Europe. -Swee Yingyi and Melinda chen
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler killed people for the purpose of racial extermination. Stalin killed people because he believed that they posed a threat to him. Neither of those are excusable, but Stalin at least had a legitimate reason for killing, while Hitler just killed because of racism.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I believe Hitler was more evil than Stalin in many ways. Hitler's motives were more evil because he specifically wanted to wipe out one whole race based on their roots and their religion. His way of destroying them was evil and ruthless. You have to be a very evil person to be able to burn people alive, and keep them in concentration camps and starve them, all while having no regrets or second thoughts.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler killed many Jews due to some of their decisions in the treaty of varsaillies I think it was strictly unfair. He also indirectly started world war 2 causing more deaths. Stalin forced people to his demands but had no means in killing except those who disagreed with communism
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

He indirectly ordered people to die even the League of Nations and some other countries like the French could not stop him from taking some countries like Austria. People died because they were Jewish, disabled or was hated by people.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I would say they are about as bad as each over, however, I just hate Hitler more anyway.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

I think so. Hitler exterminated 6 million people. He was terrible!
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler murdered people because of their race, physical disabilities (mental and physical) and their political behaviour. Although Stalin's regime also killed a number of people but Hitler only focus on getting revenge with the Jews. - Melinda Chen, Swee Ying Yi.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

In the name of religion. That makes Hitler far worse. .
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Murder is still murder... You can't possibly justify how one is more evil than the other by looking at who they murdered
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler caused the deaths of 60 million people. I come to this conclusion by looking at the root cause of the deaths. Furthermore, he deliberately exterminated people, and restricted even the most basic freedoms.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

To some maybe, to others maybe not.I'm sure the Jewish people, and everyone under Hitler's domination saw him as evil while the people under Stalin's reign saw him as more evil.What I mean is evil is subjective, it's not definite enough to say what or who is more evil because evil really is in the eye of the beholder.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin only cared about making Russia more powerful.He did not care about the welfare of his people.Most of the rules that were implemented by Stalin benefited himself rather than Russians. He wanted to be seen as the god by the people.The policies that were implemented by Stalin such as collectivization and rapid industrialization. There were both Pros and Cons in those policies. The people benefited in a way that it made the their work easier with the introduction of tractors. However, the people earned nothing as Stalin grabbed their crops and sold them.On the other hand,Hitler cared for the German people.He also promise Germany that he will overturn the treaty of Versailles and restore Germany's former borders.-by anwar n zikri
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Stalin is more evil and ruthless for he is cunning for he pretended that he was close with Lenin in order to gain legimitacy. Stalin even tricked Trotsky into missing Lenin's funeral by giving him the wrong date and as a result, many party members were angry with Trotsky when he failed to appear at the funeral. he convinced the moderates that Kamenev and Zinoviev were plotting to overthrow the government with Trotsky. Kamenev and Zinoviev were discredited and isolated after they succeed. He even expelled Trotsky from the Party and attacked Bukharin and Rykov. After eliminating all his rivals, he eventually became the dictator of Soviet Union.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

Your point will be more convincing if you can compare with Hitler. Was Hitler as ruthless as Stalin in ascending to party leadership?
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Your right except Hitler had no such plan of Genocide. Virtually everything being said about the mass murdering of Jews in concentration camps like Auschwitz have been proven to be lies. The claims by the people who write the history books about the so called Holocaust simply don't hold up under scientific scrutiny.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

I would say Stalin as he was more evil. Hitler was evil , but Stalin hated everyone. Hitler had problems with the Jews and a few others, but Stalin killed his own people and others. stalin also used fear to reign his country , he was harsh on everyone who went against his way , being merciless. stalin was not as discrimant as hitler unlike hitler who isolated a particular group . stalin even put women in the workforce and was harsh on working condition . stalin knew what he was doing to the people and knew the consequences but yet he continued which made him more evil . -marcus , yanyu , joel .
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Regardless of killing 'others' or 'one's own people', killing is still killing. How are you going to prove that Stalin was more evil than Hitler. PLease clarigy BaiJingSquared
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Stalin gave valuable opportunites to those who had proven themselves worthy to him. -Amos and Bryan
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: No, I disagree

as compared to hitler who killed 12 million people , stalin killed more than 50 million people . if murder defines evil , stalin should be more evil and merciless. - marcu , yanyu and joel .
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Hitler was in power for 12 years while Stalin was in power for 21 years. If Hitler was to be in power for 10 more years, he could have killed more than 50 million people too. -Melinda Chen, Swee Yingyi.
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Murder does not come in quantity, but in the types or state of mind in which those people were murdered. Even if one kills many in a cold-blooded massacre, killing them without thought is not as bad as killing a few with a satanic state of mind. - Aaron, Clara, Celeste
Debate: "Hitler was a more evil and ruthless leader than Stalin."
Side: Yes, I agree.

Murder does not necessarily mean evil. Evil is in the eye of the beholder. Murder is only the resultant of ones anguish and anger, they are actions of frustration. We are all human beings , we are not born evil but made evil.