azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Colored PC - Not Good.2.I agree.3. Yes4. Yes,Got a pc with loadz of ram5.Agree but still not as fast as mac6.YeaSo My result is:Get a Custom PC with Hackintosh!
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

1. white My laptop is painted in the same paint as my car. If you want a white PC, you can have one2. different than the PC many apple users pay for an interface that mimics windows. different is not better.3. beautiful (sleek) form over function and relative beauty is debatable4. Performance ( for my needs) spending equal money results in better performance for the PC almost universally5. very fast see above6. etc.. presumably this includes more expensive and less backwards compatibility?
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Macs are the most useful things in the world. I use one when im studying as i need it for school.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Definitely mac. Mac has no viruses, pc has lots, mac is way more efficient, and more powerful
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Because Mac is personalized,so I think Mac is better than PC
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

I own both but I will opine that an Apple Mac is much better because they are built to last a long time and are more intuitive.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

As far as cost and performance PC wins it.Macs are wayyy more expensive, with their cheapest computer being a laptop (a macbook air) for $999. However, their cheapest desktop is $2499. I built my pc for gaming and added a lot of extra features to it for $1500 and it tops a IMAC and MACPRO in performance.MACS are constantly being outdated quicker due to releasing newer versions of computers each year and taking away updates from older computers. This behavior is typical of a corporation like Apple to keep their customers advancing WITH THEM.PCs can be purchased for less than $300 and still contain advanced hardware and performance in graphics and sound. Just look at bestbuy's selection. You can build and customize PCs for less than 800 easily and still maintain performance on par with apple computers.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

PC's have been loyal to us ever since the beggining. Macs have a lot to do with apple where as PC's are Universal and dont have as many restrictions as Apple does.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

Macs are fast and easy to use, which is certainly better for a lot of people, but PCs are almost in a different category with the dynamics involved. There are custom builds out there that are absolute beast machines in comparison to Apple products. Aside from that, I find Apple to be overpriced for what they offer, especially with the way they try to limit what you do to their own software. Simple and easy to use, yes. But as far as power, cost/efficiency, and customizations go? PC's dominate.Example of extreme computer customization: http://img.izismile.com/img/img4/20110917/640/incredible_custom_built_computer_desk_mod_640_44.jpg
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

^Overpriced? Understatement of the year.However, this topic ISN'T about price.Which is why Macs are by far, the better choice.The sleek custom interface and the user-friendly software allows new people to be absorbed into this world.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

I still think PC is better, though the mac is catching up quickly. We will need to see what position apple takes on software and open hardware in the next few years.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

If you consider Mac as better you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm not even gonna list the advantages of a PC, they should be obvious to anyone familiar enough with both.Apple sucks on so many levels.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Well I can.I baught a PC two years ago, and it was slow to begin with (I didn't notice thou, thought every computer was like that) But Then recently I got a mac, and its soooo fast. I was like wow. Its aazing.I think pc's are for gamers and computernerds, and macs are for musicans and ladies ;)
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

I baught a PC two years ago, and it was slow to begin with (I didn't notice thou, thought every computer was like that) But Then recently I got a mac, and its soooo fast. I was like wow. Its aazing.I take it you don't know very much about the hardware (so much variety) a computer is made of, in which part PC easily outruns Mac.PC supports almost everything that has been created for computers, and has a lot of alternatives.I think pc's are for gamers and computernerds, and macs are for musicans and ladies ;)The reason for that is customizability, the hardware part. You don't have that option with Mac. So, of course gamers won't use a Mac. Mac next to a PC supports far less software and has less alternatives. The harsh truth about Apple, their products are inferior while they charge more than a PC of same specifications would cost.Um... I just checked Mac prices (Apple store). You can get as fast and as good PC with half the price of a Mac. This actually was a surprise to me, I have always known Apple is a bad company but I did not expect them to be this blatant.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

I see your point, but I just because you think PC's are better, dosen't mean they are.People are sooo different, you can never agree on one thing. So when I go shop for a computer, I look at sertain things, and so do you, but those thing might be different.So saying that I don't know anything about computers just because I like mac better than PC, is just wrong.About the price.I never regret bying a 999 dollar computer from apple, how ever I DO regret bying a 600 dollar computer from HP. I don't think anyone can convinse me to buy a PC ever again.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

I see your point, but I just because you think PC's are better, dosen't mean they are.I don't think so, I know so for a fact. PCs have much more variety and alternatives, both hardware and software. Double the price of a PC means you should get a much better computer, but you don't. They are way too overpriced, you essentially pay double for the "Apple" on the product.People are sooo different, you can never agree on one thing.I've seen that a lot.So saying that I don't know anything about computers just because I like mac better than PC, is just wrong.I didn't say you don't know anything, just that not enough.I never regret bying a 999 dollar computer from apple, how ever I DO regret bying a 600 dollar computer from HP.If you ask me then spending double the price of a PC, which has potentially better specifications than the way overpriced Mac does, is a waste of money.All of them can break one way or another, even Mac. It all comes down to how you treat them. Also, if you pay more for something, you are far more inclined to treat it well.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

I don't know how to quote what you said, so im just gonna copy the old way."I don't think so, I know so for a fact. PCs have much more variety and alternatives, both hardware and software. Double the price of a PC means you should get a much better computer, but you don't. They are way too overpriced, you essentially pay double for the "Apple" on the product."Oh, you know so for a fact? I bet you know everything then don't ya?If PC's are so damn good, then why is the macbook pro the most popular computer last year? It was voted by computer experts to be best laptop you can get today.Im not saying that just because ''experts'' think so, that its true. But when I share a opinion with some experts, I don't think you or anybody else can come to me and say that their opinion is 'fact'."I didn't say you don't know anything, just that not enough."You don't know what I know about computers, you don't know me."If you ask me then spending double the price of a PC, which has potentially better specifications than the way overpriced Mac does, is a waste of money."I've owned a very popular HP computer, the seller told me, that this was the best computer I could possibly get for that amount of money it costs, and so did reviews from other owners too.But sadly, one year after it just colapsed. It wasn't virus, I didn't ''harm'' it in any way, it was just not working anymore.And guess what, that happened to my other PC too, and also my mothers PC and my dads PC.Now we've all switched to mac, and we have been mac owners for a couple of years now. We've had minor problems with them, that could easily be fixed."All of them can break one way or another, even Mac. It all comes down to how you treat them. Also, if you pay more for something, you are far more inclined to treat it well."Yeah sure all computers can break, their not imortal, so they will break at some point.I've treated all my computers the same way, and the mac is just better. The battery is still working fine after a year, it didn't with the PC.You can say all you want, about treating computers right, but I've treated my mac and all my PC's the same way. My mac is just waaaay better.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Thank you for that tip :)But in this argument I don't have the need to quote anything you said, cuz you just proved my point.PC's collect dust, the sellers tend to fool you and all the stuff you just said, proves to me, that mac is better.But Im getting kinda bored on this one, can we just agree on not agreeing? :p
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

that mac is better.Overall PC is better. But for some more specific uses (like no need for all the variety a PC can offer) Mac can be better.can we just agree on not agreeing?Yup.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Then I guess for my needs Mac is better.I don't play games or anything. I use my computer very simply. Facebook and other social websites like gmail and stuff, and Im a student, so I also use it to make my homework with, and the appstore has some good equipments for me to do this very easily. Like notebooks and stuff, and I think that is the thing that made me think better of mac.I can see the benefits of having a PC, one is, that if you purchase the microsoft word for homeuse and students, you get something calles Onenote, wich I think is sooo cool, and I hope its soon available on macs.But currently it isnt'
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

Are you aware that your on the PC side and not on mac but yet your supporting mac?
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

I was disputing this man.Im not on any side, I didn't vote.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: Mac

See the word "Side:Mac"?wetseu rdn nuw 6lmonvichsrtjrsjtxyfknfut rdxfjx htrxjrs jfgxnfz dhffdxh rdx
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

I would have to say a PC is better than MAC because thats what I use. My PC runs great with windows vista. I can install many games on it and programs on it. I have never used a MAC so I really cant say how well a MAC runs. I just dont know how easy a MAC is to operate.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

which one is you're aware. U do that one..In my think pc is the better.S buckinghams
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

Mac is more beautifull yes but everyone who is saying they are faster are wrong. The operating system contributes to near nothing of the speed, the speed comes from the hardware and the majority of mac os's come with 1.5-2GHz whereas now windows is coming with 2.0+ on just the laptops! Also apple is much more overpriced, I garuntee if Apple stopped sponging money of us, their products would cost less than 60% their value now. I have to say the iPod/Phone is great but the Mac is definantly weaker.Wait..I forgot Linux is better than both :D
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

Macs are to pricy,whereas pc are only going for like £300-£400.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

PC is the original brand that mastered the computer industry. I PC computer is much cheaper than a Mac. Apple should forget about their computer and only focus on their iPods and iPads.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

Ummmmmmm.......................errrr..........................well....... PC!
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

As a Systems Administrator who handles Mac, Windows, Linux, VMware, and various other servers, and mac/windows/linux clients for each...I favor PC over Mac, generally speaking. They're different categories. When a general or multi-purpose system is needed, PC excels over Mac significantly. I see Apple devices in general as appliances rather than computers- quite good at their intended role, but lacking beyond that. PCs, on the other hand, can be made to perform any role, but may not perform it as well as an Apple product designed specifically for that role.I tend to favor versatility, to be fair. Apple's proprietary nature across all of their products cripples them in that regard.I'd love to vote for Linux, as it has the potential to be everything PC is given time and adoption, but at current it has de facto limits much like Apple's, even if being proprietary generally isn't an issue.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

I would have to say PC because PCs are far more customize-able and far more powerful than macs, plus there are many different varieties of PCs that are made to suit your individual needs and macs are all the same, they just come in different sizes.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

I prefer PC. It is much more convenient and you can always change the configuration or repair it. For example if you have problems with the video card, they are quite common. But I think the solution to this problem is not always to replace it. Examples you can look at this website. This is the site of a great company that is dedicated to consulting and solving any problems with electronic gadgets, such as PCs, Macs, iPhones, smartphones, and more. Just go to this site and read 'bout it on your own.
Debate: What is better pc or mac?
Side: PC

PC, all the way. Macs are just way too overpriced. The price/performance ratio is off so it's like people are only paying for the OS, which is definitely not worth $1000~ (iMacs). On a PC, there's upgradability. People don't have to buy the latest MacBook/iMac model just to get better specifications, instead, they could simply open up their PC's side panel, work a bit with a screwdriver (depending on the part) and you're done. You're not replacing your current PC to get a one with better specs.PCs are more customizable. Are you sick and tired of that 1920x1080 AIO monitor? Well, with a PC, you could just buy a new one and do stuff on a 1440p panel. Oh, you don't like the performance that i5? PCs can have their processors replaced! You're Mac can't game (that's another point)? On a Windows/Linux machine, just replace/add a better video card. The possibilities are endless.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Oww, I see what you saying. There not the same because animals are worth more to us. And humans are not worth much to them. I do believe with out animals humans would not lived through out history. But I think animals would not need us I think they would be fine with out us. Just in case that was not what you meant. Yes I think animals are people to. But I would still choose a human over a animal. Uless it a old person or a unborn child.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Animals are just worth the same as a human. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

yes they are the same worth.. but, in the same place people eat them as food
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

And animals eat us as food. what is your point. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

animals rarely eat people but, peolple daily eat animals ..
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

I've backed up your point with some articles, so Goodmale, consider this argument of his an branch of mine or vice versa, if you are considering asking for proof. The proof is in the links, I've yet to see any of yours.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

These are some I can get more. http://www.google.com/url?q=http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Whatanimalsdohumanseat&sa=U&ei=k4vbUtmqPJLgsAT124HgDQ&ved=0CDUQFjAD&sig2=Zi6FgehObNBQ8BmN87zRA&usg=AFQjCNFJzd9yvy0yECOh73fna3jbh6Ljghttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-eater
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

The first link is unnecessary since it's been well established that humans eat animals.The second link is full of holes, that I had taken care of in my argument.Opening the first arrow labeled "Big Cats" under 'Tigers' I saw this statement in favor of my point.Unlike leopards and lions, man-eating tigers rarely enter human habitations in order to acquire prey. The majority of victims are reportedly in the tiger's territory when the attack takes place"As it says the humans that were eaten were in the tiger's territory. I said in my argument that, animals will not normally eat humans unless they are either starved, or protecting their territory, among other reasons. Under 'Lions' I saw this statement in favor of my point:"Lions typically become man-eaters for the same reasons as tigers: starvation, old age and illness"Under leopards I read that they only become that way after eating an already dead corpse and aquiring a taste for humans.I searched "Canids"Under wolves i found that they become man eaters after living close to humans, and losing their fear of humans. Definitely now a normal case. I also read that they are a very low percentage for their danger potential.Under dingoes, their is only 3 recorded cases in Australia, and they say that normally dingoes are shy around humans.Under domestic dogs I found that man eating domestic dogs usually occur when the dog has been mistreated by the owner.Under coyote I found that not one coyote to human attack has ever even succeeded. It stated that the humans always managed to win just by fighting them off.I'll stop there, since I think I've more than proven my point and dashed yours in saying Animals do not normally eat humans.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Your point proves my point and the second you should have read. If the animal is hungry. It may not go after a human because they fear they lose the battle. But Big animals would go after humans. Man eating animal are also that way because they took the chance at eating a human. And if there was a pack of wolves and one human. The wolves would totally go after the human. It is hard to prove this because people don't always walk were wolves can see them. example If a hunter was hunting he would be hiding. Then he see wolves but wolves don't see him. Then he takes the shot killing a wolf. And the other wolves run not because there fear the human. Because they fear the gunshot it self.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

With the link you gave me, and with the link I gave you first, including lions, bears, and piranhas (animals all known for attacking human sized and greater prey) I proved to you that animals do not normally attack humans. How are you even disputing this right now? The evidence could not have been more clear.Your example of the wolves is false. I also told you, from the link you gave me, that wolves lived next to humans, but due to natural fear of the humans never attacked, even the humans that were alone at times. When they finally lost that fear, they still only attacked the smallest, and that was when they had no other food source.You are wrong. Stop talking bullshit. I hate to say things like this because I've seen you when you get defensive, but I've had enough of your bullshit. I have offered you facts that you can not deny, and proof, that you can see clearly by reading any of the links posted. Animals no matter the size do not eat humans normally.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Ok it just go's to show you don't know anything about animals. After you said my wolves example is false because it not. That example go's for all pack animals its a fact. I don't have to prove it to you because you still will not get your wrong.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

That because they don't get a chance to. Or because they did try to eat the human but the human win the battle.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

there are many cases in which a crocodile or a cheeta has eaten peolple but, animals do not like anybody else disturbing them and therefore they attack .. they dont attack because they were hungry
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Believe me, Animals will attack humans because there hungry.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

humans are the only mamal who can eat even if he is not hungry ...but it is not like that in wild animals
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

That is truly false I want some links. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

what is false in this you can eat whenever you want be it vegetarian or non vegetarian
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Animals can eat when they want even if there not hungry.!!!!!
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

no they dont eat when they are not hungry and it is a fact.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

I am sorry but that not a fact. Animals eat mostly when there hungry but they also eat when there not.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

but it is a fact that humans eat more animals than animals eat humans..
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

they don't attack because they are hungry, and without other food source.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

Animals attack for lots of reasons. Iincluding hungry. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

Okay...
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

Animals will normally eat anything besides humans. Humans are literally always a last ditch resort. If an animal does kill a human, and it wasn't for food, it was for territory. You've got to work on the logic, and proof in your arguments or no one will ever take you seriously. I still struggle to.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: Yes

You have no proof so don't talk. Animals will kill a human being just like they would a animal.
Debate: Is a animal worth the same to life as a human
Side: no

Here we have a video of a man swimming with the world's most dangerous fish, the piranha. You will see, and they will tell you, that because the fish are not starving, their is no reason for them to attack a creature as large or as odd as a human.Here you have a link telling you what you should do if you encounter a bear. In case you don't open any of these links I'll simply copy and past the most assertive piece of evidence in favor of my argument."Remember, most bears prefer to avoid contact with humans, and any bear you do see is probably just as frightened as you are!"Here you have an explanation as to why the Tsavo Man Eating lions were man eaters. To sum up the article, lion don't generally hunt, they actually prefer to eat the left over carcass left by another hunter, but if they do hunt they prefer larger animals. Larger than them, such as buffalo, gazelle, or dear, and will usually only resort to eating human when their other food sources, are gone, as they were in the Tsavo man eater case.I've offered proof, and sources of my point, where is yours (I ask for the second time)?Note: Before you dispute me, re read my first argument I never said animals don't eat humans, I said animals won't eat humans normally.