azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

It's ironic that catholics defend babies now whereas before, they allowed Augustine to condemn babies for not being baptized.....https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/five-non-religious-arguments-against-abortion
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Even Secularists value the lives of an infant: https://www.frc.org/brochure/the-best-pro-life-arguments-for-secular- audiences It's common sense that most human beings; man or woman, boy or girl can come to understand if they allow themselves to.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Common abortion fallacies:https://abort73.com/abortion/commonobjections/
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Arguments over rape and incest divides pro choicers? Tell me, pro choicers, do you bleed? You will!https://apnews.com/article/health-north-america-us-news-ap-top-news-elections-84a47d2e26d4419c8b616db5c5f0fa6d
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Pro choicers do not value human life. Just because you are pro choice, doesn't mean you are making the right decision, because pro lifers know right from wrong. https://www.avemariapress.com/engagingfaith/argument-against-abortion-using-sled-acronym
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

More Evidence that fetuses are living:https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Philosophy/Thinking CriticallyAboutAbortion(NobisandGrob)/05:BetterArguments-Philosophers’Arguments/5.01:ArgumentsAgainstAbortion/05:BetterArguments-Philosophers’Arguments/5.01:ArgumentsAgainstAbortion)Yes. Real scientists are doing this to prove pro choicers wrong.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

God gave us the gift and tools of procreation. Jesus spoke about how children are precious and are to be cherished. Killing fetuses aka murderous abortion is unjustified. Secularists are using the science, religious people are using moral values. Both are not without one another. In other words, it is not mutually exclusive. God and science go together because He created all things including science. https://reasons.org/explore/publications/facts-for-faith/argument-for-the-silent-a-biblical-case- against-abortion
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Pro life arguments:https://endabortionnow.com/10-answers-to-common-pro-choice-objections/
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

As I said before, relationships are made up of two people; one man and one woman. Men should not remain silent and women should not silence men on this matter. Feminazis and man haters will be silenced by the truth and only the truth. You are warned.https://www.mccl.org/post/men-shouldn-t-be-silent-on-abortion
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

There are reasons behind why women would choose no on having an abortion. You want women to choose? Then LET THEM SPEAK! MOST WOMEN WITH COMMON SENSE AND EXPERIENCE WILL SAY NO AND YOU WILL SEE WHY. AS FOR WOMEN WHO DON'T HAVE EXPERIENCE YET OR NEVER WANT TO? REMAIN SILENT AND SHOW SOME HUMILITY. https://www.profemina.org/en/abortion/reasons-against-abortion
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

If you think this is a game, "pro choicers", you've mastered nothing. I am well aware that pro choice is only a coverup for pro abortionist menaces aka baby serial killers. Abortion remains a crime and is unacceptable. Whether it's religious or not, people have common ground on this. Human life is precious.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

You may argue that pro lifers don't have proof that abortion is terrible. But that's the very reason why we don't show pictures of dead babies because those photos are terrifying and horrible. I will testify, I have seen pictures of real dead babies due to an abortion. I will say, it is what it is. It is not a pleasant sight. It is not right. It is not justified. It is pure evil. You pro choicers aka po abortionists may think it's fake. But is it? No.https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Siegel RightsReasonsDukeLJ.pdfEven Yale Students protested against Roe v Wade in favour of banning abortion!!! I will go to Yale to finish Law School.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Let me ask you, is Roe v Wade justified? No. It claims that we cannot ban abortion? Than what's the point of choosing right? Exactly. Roe v Wade is wrong, that's why it was overturned.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

The risks of Abortion:https://www.compasscare.info/health-information/abortion/abortion-risks-and-side-effects/
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

The bash against hypocrites like "sciencerules" continues:It seems science disagrees with the snowflake.Mad? I don't care truthphobe.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Pro lifers are pro science. But pro abortion are anti science. "Sciencerules" is the pinnacle of that example above all the other pro abortionists. He is defeated in an absolute manner. Baby lives matter.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Hypocrisy within the pro choice movement exists like how water exists on earth and like how the devil loves to use pawns in his political game which he always fails because God always wins. "Sciencerules" is only one of many under his evil influence. Pro abortionists are weak and exposed. They have zero morality and only the claim that it's the "mother's choice" and yet they deny people to be pro lifers hm? That is the definition of hypocritical. Claiming one thing but doing the exact opposite. "Sciencerules" also claims to be anti hateful but is hateful towards Christians, pro lifers and truth speakers. He is a snowflake and a truthphobic ignorant. https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/june-web-only/abortion-politics-pro-lifers-arent-hypocrites.html
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Pro choicers claim there is a choice right? But how when they decide babies should be aborted? Does that give babies A CHOICE? No, it robs them of life! That is the truth behind abortion supporters. Murderers will not see the Kingdom of God. The left, as disarranged as it is may claim whatever they like about pro lifers. It doesn't change the fact that the sanctity of life is precious. Mothers cherish their babies. Pro abortionists forget that they were once born from his or her mother's womb once. What an abuse of choice eh? Going against your own kind? Calling fetuses parasites?
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

I am pulling back the lens. This might seem off topic at first. Conservatives don't care about fetuses. They just want a way to enforce the white supremacist patriarchal status quo.Conservatives don't care about Japanese Americans. "incarcerate about 120,000 Japanese Americans, many American-born, in internment camps. Forced to leave behind their homes, businesses, and property, many Japanese Americans lost everything." Erin BlakemoreNor the Chinese Americans with the Chinese Exclusion Act. Remember yellowface? Trump doesn't care about Asian Americans. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-kellyanne-conway-coronavirus n5eeebc5dc5b6aac5f3a46b45Which leads to violence against all Asian Americans. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/trumps-chinese-virus-tweet-helped-lead-rise-racist/story?id=76530148 Trump doesn't care about you. Stop voting against your own interests. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35657278/
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

All of your arguments are invalidated 100%. What you say makes zero sense. Cry me a river and get over it. All truths I speak of are absolute. My testimony of Jesus Christ stands.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

"Sciencerules" has zero reliable sources, reasons being, he is very biased from biden's administration of corruption, hypocrisy and racism. His arguments are invalidated once again.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

I wonder what would be a reliable source for you? Clearly not national geographic since I just linked to that.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Clearly, you are blinded by your own pride, hubris and hypocrisy so you turn a blind eye whenever I do post reliable sources. That is why your arguments are invalidated and ignored.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Trump doesn't care about Asian Americans."On the night several Asian women were shot dead in Atlanta, he referred to COVID-19 as the "China Virus" on Fox News." Dr. Mishal RejaMaking incendiary racist remarks is not pro-life.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

You deliver false news. While Trump cares about all Americans. It's biden and his bidencrats who doesn't care. They like to lie alot about Trump and so does the media. Blind sheep like you are naive enough to believe the lies. That's why your arguments are invalidated. "Trump doesn't care" - says the leftists and corrupt snowflakes, "Sciencerules" includedThat's only a toxic subjective opinion. Democrats don't care and they are liars, hypocrites and narcissists. Fact check: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/ Trump made America great in all aspects and he cared to improve the employment rates to increase. For all Americans of all ethnicities. Your arguments are invalidated. "Sciencerules" is not only hypocritical, he is a sexist, racist and a pedophile.Ron DeSantis is absolutely justified to overturn the toxic roe v wade "law". Leftists claim it is for the "unconstitutional ban" of abortions across the states. Yet, you can't have one side without the other. Of course there will be a balance of pro abortionists who are fools and the common sense motivated pro lifers. Near the end, it was justified to overturn roe v wade because it doesn't give women the choice to say no to abortion and it's absolutely their right to say no to abortions. Feminazis will be skinned alive by the truth and only the truth. "sciencerules" has already been skinned and will again. His arguments are invalidated to the bone.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Please don't use the word Rush Limbaugh coined in 1992. Just for starters it violates Godwin's law. This is just an easy slur that many others have used. Covid-19 deniers violate Godwin's law. Also, it cheapens the deaths of those who suffered in world war II. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nashville-hat-shop-promotes-anti-vaccine-yellow-star-david-badge-n1269106
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Using wikipedia once again? Another strawman attack dodged. You are weak and invalidated indeed. You do not have the truth in you because you are a weak subjective toxic snowflake. Your arguments are invalidated. Cry me a river. I will use what I want. You are silenced.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

This is why pro lifers are pro lifers:4 real women talk about having an abortion. You WILL FIND OUT OF ALL OF THEM, AT LEAST ONE OR A FEW WHO HAVE REGRETTED HAVING AN ABORTION. PRO ABORTIONISTS HAVE THE AUDACITY TO SHOW COMPASSION FOR WHAT YOU'VE GONE THROUGH AND YET THEY STILL WANT KILLING A DEVELOPING HUMAN BEING AKA A FETUS TO BE LEGAL? HYPOCRISY OF THE ABORTIONIST AGENDA EXPOSED. FEMINAZIS ARE BANNED FROM THIS FORUM FOR MISANDRISM AND MISGOGYNISM."If you won't even accept left center feminist frequency and probably center bias center for countering digital hate then you are so extreme right there is no convincing you." - "sciencerules" the hypocritical strawman loving snowflake (Opponent on the wrong side)"Truly truly I say unto you, if ye are not reborn from water and of the spirit, thou shalt not enter thy Kingdom of God." - Jesus Christ, the Son of God (Our Savior who is on the righteous side)"If you won't accept that real women have gone through abortions and have regretted it, then you are clearly a human being without a conscience and because of this, pro lifers are even more justified to fight for baby lives because yes, they do matter. You clearly are extremely leftist and you are clearly ignorant and retarded. There is no common sense within you and you clearly are sexist towards men. You are a hypocrite and you are clearly hateful. There is no truth within you. You have proven time and time and again that you would rather support pedophiles and immoral toxic ideologies rather than defending the lives of human beings, especially developing newborns. What does this say about yourself? That you are no longer behaving humanely but rather, inhumanely. You will be committed to Arkham Asylum for life because you just proved yourself to be a feminazi. Nazis were leftists FYI snowflake. Cry me a river and get over it." - Dr. Batman (Follower of Jesus who is also on the righteous side.)Here are four women who have gone through abortions. One or a few will say they've regretted it. None of my arguments have strawman to it. You on the other hand? Yep. You are what you sew. That's how your arguments are invalidated 100% flawlessly.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgvOtrBbYE0 God prevails!
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Evidence of women testifying that abortion is terrifying:https://siragainesville.com/abortion-regrets-a-sad-reality-for-many-  women/Attempt to say that "it's a strawman attack" and you will automatically be destroyed by your own words. I dare you because I know some of you are naive enough to step out of line. There will be zero mercy for the wicked of this world. You have been warned.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Ex female abortionist regrets holding up her abortion sign:https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/ 250254/women-regret-abortion-find-healing Many women say they don't regret an abortion is solely because they are affected by today's third wave feminazism. Yes, that's right. They are only saying that because they are brainwashed. All non redeemable feminazis will be wiped from the earth. Women who realize the truth of how much babies are precious will wake up from their mind controlled state and stand against the feminazis regime. To the women out there, I may not understand the pain of pregnancy but as a man, I know I would be responsible and I do not run from my responsibilities. Having an abortion is running from your responsibilities. Once you see that, you will realize how wrong you were for supporting the termination of a newborn child. Children have the right to live. You were once a fetus yourself. What does that say about yourself? Oh please, don't try to use the "But you are trying to make me feel guilty" kind of statement. It doesn't work because are you offended by the truth? If you are offended and if you are a woman, you deserve to be sterilized. If you are a man tho and you want your wife's child or girlfriend's child to die, even though you are the dad here not the mom, you deserve to be imprisoned as well because you equally had a hand in creating the child in the first place. All abortionists deserve to be imprisoned for life. Dehumanizing a fetus to a mere parasite says alot about yourself as a human being because you were once in your mother's womb. Did she not push you out and bring you into this world? If you had been aborted, you wouldn't even get to have your say and that's what's unfortunate about those newborn baby boys and girls. They could have lived better lives than all of you abortionists combined. But it doesn't matter to you about whether a baby lives right? Why? Because you are so selfish when you made the decision to have sex and won't take responsibility! That IS THE TRUTH! To all pro lifers, keep standing up for truth. DO NOT BE AFRAID!God prevails.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Everything you've said are not lies. You have spoken the truth indeed. I USED TO BELIEVE IT UNTIL I SAW THE TRUTH!
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Children have the right to liveYou don't have the right to force anyone to live in this swamp of corruption and degeneracy. This isn't about a child's right to anything; it's about your desire for control. You don't have any right to decide for anybody else whether they want to live in this world. All you are interested in doing is forcing your insane zealotry down the throats of other people.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Relief to regret: (Your conscience will never rest)https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-38775641
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

A woman talks about her regret of an abortion:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dCwx91MOY
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

"Every villain is a hero of his own story." - Bruce Wayne in court from Injustice 2"Sciencerules" is a MAJOR EXAMPLE OF THIS. Out of the amount of toxic comments, hypocritical strawman assaults, insults, heterophobic, Christophobic and truthphobic immature screaming, I find the accused guilty of committing crime against humanity. He certifies himself as a hero yet he proves otherwise. A true hero never has to call himself nor herself a hero. I will not say I am a hero, I will say I am a concerned citizen for the safety and security of all citizens, all human beings; men and women, boys and girls who have the common sense to know right from wrong. Those who are activists for immoral views and subjective toxic ideologies are liars of society. But they claim they are heroic in their actions. They only prove to be monsters. Bruce was right. Jesus was right too. Only a few walk the narrow path through the narrow gate of truth and life. Caring about the lives of innocent babies isn't wrong but only villains will say otherwise. Sooner or later, people will regret ever supporting abortion once they realize the truths behind it.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

If the fetus isn't a feeling and thinking conscious life, then I don't see the problem in aborting it. It can't feel pain emotional or physical, and it has no thoughts about it, this being hasn't came into existence yet, being against abortion before the fetus has obtained consciousness is like being mad because Bob the person with A, B, ..., Y, Z traits hadn't come into existence. Abortion before the fetus has gained consciousness is no more wrong than using a condom, in either case you are preventing the potential existence of a human being, not ending one.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

My wife was in a coma for 3 weeks following a heart attack and we didn't know if she would ever come out of it. Your comments are very disturbing.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Okay, but that doesn't dispute his point. Or, if it is an attempt to dispute his original point, all you've done is an appeal to emotion. This is not a good basis for an argument.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

I agree, in addition to this, I think a woman should have a choice of what grows in her body at all times. For example, if she had a parasite, isn't it reasonable for her to take medication to get rid of it?I do not think pregnancy is that much different. A fetus shares a lot in common with a parasite.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Are you saying that a child in the womb is a parasite?
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

They share many of the properties of a parasite. They do not benefit the mother, they take up nutrition, they are dependent on the host. This is debatable, however, many argue that fetuses are in fact parasites.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

I am asking YOU - if YOU think a child in the womb is a parasite and if you do,... what is it that you support that belief with? Because the science classes I had - taught me that the child in the womb is a member of the same species as it's parent and that alone is enough to disqualify it as a parasite.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

I see, but that is a really weak criteria to base it on. If it does everything a parasite does and is unwanted, it truly is a parasite. If you want it, it is not a parasite. Understand? I'm talking about bad parasites.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

No. I don't understand what you typed at all. Is English a second language for you? If so, something is getting lost in your translation.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Actually a child in the womb is like a parasite. Definition of a parasite an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment. The child in question cannot survive outside of the womb on its own making it a parasite.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

A fetus, aside from extreme examples, is not a safety hazard in the way that a parasite is
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

How dare you dehumanize a fetus to a mere parasite. You were once a fetus too. Why didn't your mother ever teach you that you are a human being and that you should respect people all around you? It just seems you would be willing to degrade a newborn baby to a mere parasite? So you weren't then nomeansno? I would say you are the parasite here and you are a murderer of infants. Your arguments are invalidated because it's solely immoral. Fetuses are developing human beings. Parasites are a danger to human beings. Babies are not parasites.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Anyone that thinks a zygote is a person needs to go back to 2nd grade biology class.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Yeah well a zygote happens to be part of a human being so it's out of the question, degenerate. Your argument is invalidated. Cry me a river and get over it, snowflake.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

When people make the argument that Abortion is the murder of a potential life, then they should try to ban masturbation, since it is the knowing "murder" of potential children. And what if the women is raped? or molested? What if men poked a hole in the condom to force a broken condom?
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

When people like you claim it's a "pro choice" to not let the baby live and then attempt to bash in those who care for human life, you stand out as a hypocritical murderer. Your argument is invalidated 100% immediately. You have zero common sense.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

I like the idea that the person who is already alive should have the choice whether or not they want bring another life into this world that hasn't even had a chance to live yet, that could be troublesome to their life.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

But now wait a second..., people have the choice to use condoms. If they don't want to bring another life into this world that hasn't even had a chance to live yet, that could be troublesome to their life..., couldn't they just chose to use a condom? Pro-Choice is an oxymoron. They had a choice. They just didn't make the right choice when they decided to have unprotected sex. ;)
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

That too. I'm a forward thinker. lol. I like to jump to the most dramatic idea I can get and in this case the idea was few days before birth.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

A child in the womb is also alive... else how would they grow, mature and further develop past that magical point where (after) even YOU can't deny they are alive anymore?
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

The adjective already, meaning Before or by now or the time in question was used.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

In most pregnancies, they are both already alive.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

So the child is already alive when the woman 1st got her driver's license? Was the child alive when she went to prom? When she got her first hair, said her first word, drank alcohol for the first time?Absolutely not, the fetus is only existing in there after she had sex and let the semen take route. At this point in time the one who was already alive should have say in what happens to the fetus that was not already alive that is leaching off of her.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

No matter when it begins...Once the child is alive, it is automatically entitled to his or her life and to the equal protections of our laws.