azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

You contradicted yourself. The species of the fetus is human if we are discussing a human. I did not contradict myself. I was actually thinking of a variety of fetus from a variety of species. You are discussing human I was not. I was discussing fetus and embryo being human.  It came from no other species. A human fetus is human if the species it came from determines if what it is.How would I know that based purely on the question?So now you just admitted that a human fetus is indeed human.I am admitting that a HUMAN FETUS is a HUMAN.I am not admitting that THE FETUS and THE EMBRYO is a HUMAN without MORE CLARIFICATION.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

I did not contradict myself. I was actually thinking of a variety of fetus from a variety of species. You are discussing human I was not. I was discussing fetus and embryo being human.We have established that a fetus is human. Okay. Why is an embryo not?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

We have established that a fetus is human. Okay. Why is an embryo not?No, we have not. We have establish that a fetus CAN BE A HUMAN. You may as well leave me alone OddHannah. you are arguing with a straw man. Unless you aren`t meaning to misrepresent my argument in which case you can correct yourself.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

You do not have the capacity to understand my argumentYou just admitted a fetus is a human. You never said anything that just utterly made me confused. In fact you have just been running around barely answering anything. You are the one that doesnt have the capacity to understand my arguments.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

No i didn`t. We established that it can be a human.You never said anything that just utterly made me confused.You are obviously confused.In fact you have just been running around barely answering anything.That's not true.You are the one that doesnt have the capacity to understand my argumentsI understand your argument just fine OddHannah. You are claiming that if a member of the homo sapian species has concieved a child. That embryo and that to be fetus is a human. YES!. That is correct. However, just saying that the fetus and the embryo are human does not make that argument valid because I can define the fetus and the embryoThe:DefinitionUsed to refer to a person, place, or thing that is uniqueFetus:An unborn or unhatched offspring of a mammalembryo:An unborn or unhatched offspring in the process of development.Good bye Oddhanah.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

You seemed to be the confused one. You are arguing against her yet your argument supports her. Does that make any logical sense? That's not true.Actually it is. You go from admitting she was right to complete technical terms. However, just saying that the fetus and the embryo are human does not make that argument valid because I can define the fetus and the embryoDo you understand the point of this debate? He argument was valid. Your argument validated her argument. You are arguing against yourself.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

You seemed to be the confused one. You are arguing against her yet your argument supports her. Does that make any logical sense? WOW are you fucking retarded? Do you not know how to read?I'm saying that the fetus can be human but, this fucking question is not that fucking specific. Actually it is. You go from admitting she was right to complete technical terms. Actually, it isn't she isn't arguing against my argument. She's misrepresenting it.Do you understand the point of this debate? He argument was valid. Your argument validated her argument. You are arguing against yourself.Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being? <---------- the point of my argument.Her argument is not valid against mineour argument validated her argument. You are arguing against yourself.No I'm not. You don't get it. The question is unspecific. You assume the specifics. I did not and now I got 3 people trying to tell me I'm wrong and arguing against myself when you all clearly do not understand what I'm arguing.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

WOW are you fucking retarded? Do you not know how to read?I'm saying that the fetus can be human but, this fucking question is not that fucking specific. I am sure the creator of the debate meant for it to be about the human fetus only. Also you could have just looked around and seen that we are talking about a human fetus. No I am not mentally handicapped. I did learn how to read. Actually, it isn't she isn't arguing against my argument. She's misrepresenting it.She understood your argument. You just decided not to attach yourself to her argument. You didn't want to be wrong.Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being? <---------- the point of my argument.Her argument is not valid against mineThe creator of this debate was only referring to a human fetus. There is no use in arguing about any other animal. That should be easy to identify for you. No I'm not. You don't get it. The question is unspecific. You assume the specifics. I did not and now I got 3 people trying to tell me I'm wrong and arguing against myself when you all clearly do not understand what I'm arguing.The creator of this debate doesn't have to be specific. It is implied that when debating we are talking about the most relevant fetus, which is the human fetus. You should know that. You knew. OddHannah's arguments hinted them at you multiple times. The other debater around here only spoke of a human fetus. You knew the whole time and just didn't want to be deemed incorrect.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

I am sure the creator of the debate meant for it to be about the human fetus only. Also you could have just looked around and seen that we are talking about a human fetus. No I am not mentally handicapped. I did learn how to read. Listen PhotoDragon, I don`t care about if I am supposed to assume something or not. I answered the damn question the way it was presented. That is it. End of story. I don`t need you and Chuz, to fight this girls battle for her when you are all now clearly in the wrong.Also you could have just looked around and seen that we are talking about a human fetusI don't care what you were talking about. I WAS ASKED A QUESTION AND WHAT I THOUGHT ABOUT IT. She understood your argument. You just decided not to attach yourself to her argument. You didn't want to be wrong.If she understood my argument she wouldn't be arguing with me. She would accept it and not say that "Oh well, we all assumed that the author was talking about a human child so it's wrong that you didn't too".The creator of this debate was only referring to a human fetus. There is no use in arguing about any other animal. That should be easy to identify for you. There isn't any reason to be arguing with me in the first place. My argument only helps you. A fetus is a describing word of time frames. Embryos too. but they are words referring to a variety of animal species. I help you by saying if that species is human. Then yes, that particular fetus would be a human. The creator of this debate doesn't have to be specific. It is implied that when debating we are talking about the most relevant fetus, which is the human fetus. You should know that. You knew. OddHannah's arguments hinted them at you multiple times. The other debater around here only spoke of a human fetus. You knew the whole time and just didn't want to be deemed incorrect.Specifics are everything. This debate gave me no indication that the fetus in question was objectively human. So I took the most objective answer. SORRY I DIDN`T CONFORM TO EVERYONES GOD DAMNED ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS.You should know that. You knew. LIES!OddHannah's arguments hinted them at you multiple times. The other debater around here only spoke of a human fetus. You knew the whole time and just didn't want to be deemed incorrect.That's not the truth at all.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Listen PhotoDragonIt's PhotonDragon. Not Photo. I don`t care about if I am supposed to assume something or not. I answered the damn question the way it was presented. That is it. End of story. I don`t need you and Chuz, to fight this girls battle for her when you are all now clearly in the wrong.You are in the wrong. The debate implied human fetus. Everybody else seems to have realized that but you.I don't care what you were talking about. I WAS ASKED A QUESTION AND WHAT I THOUGHT ABOUT IT. You went for the "technical" argument so you can't be wrong. The debate implied a human fetus. If she understood my question she wouldn't be arguing with me. She would accept it and not say that "Oh well, we all assumed that the author was talking about a human child so it's wrong that you didn't too".She argued because you admitted it in one of your earlier posts showing that you understood that it was about a human fetus.There isn't any reason to be arguing with me in the first place. My argument only helps you. A fetus is a describing word of time frames. Embryos too. but they are words referring to a variety of animal species. I help you by saying if that species is human. Then yes, that particular fetus would be a human. How does that help me? I may not think it is a human being. Specifics are everything. This debate gave me no indication that the fetus in question was objectively human. So I took the most objective answer. SORRY I DIDN`T CONFORM TO EVERYONES GOD DAMNED ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS.Everyone else understood what was implied but you. That's not the truth at all.It isn't? Everybody else didn't start off debating about a human fetus? OddHannah told you what the debate was about. You still failed to get the picture.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Idiot. You know as well as anything that she is talking about a human fetus.... she shouldn't have to specifiy that it's a human in the fetal stage for every post.Anyone can just see that you said only one post ago "I am admitting that a HUMAN FETUS is a HUMAN."She's arguing with a straw-man alright... though I'd be surprised if you even have that much of a spine.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Idiot. You know as well as anything that she is talking about a human fetus....That doesn't stop me from being critical about what I'm agreeing to or not agreeing too. That also doesn't make me an idiot.she shouldn't have to specifiy that it's a human in the fetal stage for every post.Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being? Then I don't have to accept that it is a human in the fetal stage.though I'd be surprised if you even have that much of a spine.What does that mean?An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Everyone can see it for themselves. First you said they are (humans) and then you pulled a 180 and said they are not... You've no credibility left.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

He did the same thing with me before.... I called him on it and he denied it... so either he was extremely ignorant or extremely self-centered, which means that his psyche is forcing him not to acknowledge that he messed up..... Or he is trolling.I'd say that it is the second one... he believes that there is nothing wrong with slaughtering unborn children.... He is worse than Hitler..................................................
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Double post
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

The technique is called "rope a dope". Muhamed Ali used to use it a lot in his fights... when he was getting tired and had no idea what else to do, he would just tie up his opponent by trying to wear them out, leaning on them and keeping them busy until a chance to make a move presented itself. (like most other pro-aborts) He knows as well as anyone else does - that an abortion kills a child. They know its more than just a semantic case that can be made...They just can't afford to let it be known and so maintaining the denials and playing rope a dope is basically the only two plays they know.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

I mean it might be.Oh wait you mean if the gamete cells are both human that the fetus is? The of course. It's a human fetus, but it's bot a human being if that's what you asking.My hair, is human hair.My nails, are human nails.That fetus, is a human fetus.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

What is the difference between a human and a human being?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

In the case it was being used, a human being is a noun, a thing. Human is at that time being used as an adjective. The fetus is definitely human, but only by adjective it is in no way a human being yet.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Now why is that? Why is the fetus not a human being?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

It has no brain activity that sets it's life as being a being. It's not even a separate being yet. Why is my semen, or a woman's ova not a human being?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

A woman's egg isn't an organism.Sperm however is a living organism. It has no brain activity that sets it's life as being a beingA little after fertilization it becomes an organism. It doesnt matter if it is separate. It is still an organism.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

If sperm is an organism, and it is human in nature, why is it not a human being? A little after fertilization it becomes an organism. It doesnt matter if it is separate. It is still an organism.You are absolutely correct. It is an organism, that organism is a fetus.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

If sperm is an organism, and it is human in nature, why is it not a human being? Honestly I have no clue. However that isn't what this debate is about.You are absolutely correct. It is an organism, that organism is a fetus.And that fetus is a human.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

One is the human body and the other is referring to the human existence.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

A human being is just a human. That is it. Type human being in Google. It pulls up Human.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Why would you be saying human being if you just want to say human? That doesn't make much sense to me. Can you explain?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

I didn't create this debate. Still a human being is a human.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

I didn't create this debateUhh... Okay, I don't see how that was relevant to anything I asked. If you don't want to answer or don't know that's okay. It would be nice to get an actual answer though.Still a human being is a human.Yes but, why would you make two words that mean different things mean the former? Isn't it illogical to have an unnecessary word that has meaning have no meaning and only be used for extra syllables? I don't understand.On top of that I believe human being is looked at as one word. With a space in the middle. No Hyphen.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Uhh... Okay, I don't see how that was relevant to anything I asked. If you don't want to answer or don't know that's okay. It would be nice to get an actual answer though.You posted this: "why say human being?"I didn't say human being any time before that so I assumed you were talking about the creator of the debate.If you agree then why are we arguing?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

I didn't say human being any time before that so I assumed you were talking about the creator of the debate.Uhh... You asked what the difference was between human and human being. Then proceeded to tell me that they are the same thing. I didn't understand that "human being" as it was actually one word as it seems to be two different words with two different meanings. I then asked why would you need to say human being to mean "human"? It sounds rather redundant to add two extra syllables. I'm just curious is all and you just avoided my question twice. I'm assuming to see if I will make a mistake in trying to get a straight answer from you?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Uhh... You asked what the difference was between human and human being. Then proceeded to tell me that they are the same thing. I didn't understand that "human being" as it was actually one word as it seems to be two different words with two different meanings. I then asked why would you need to say human being to mean "human"? It sounds rather redundant to add two extra syllables. You do understand that I asked in order to get an answer out of him right? And begin my debate from there? Thats it. If you don't have anything to debate with me about Fetus' then we are finished.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

You do understand that I asked in order to get an answer out of him right?Yes. Do I not have the right to speak? Looking at this debate as a whole you had no problem doing what I have done. And begin my debate from there?Do you mean begin the discussion from the question I first responded too?Thats it.No need to get decisive. If you don't have anything to debate with me about Fetus' then we are finished.Well, that was a rude way to end the conversation...
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Also you downvoted me because I misunderstood what you said?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

That point wouldn't be relevant to the debate would it? .
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

One is the human body and the other is referring to the human existence.Your comment reminded me of this legal definition. person n1 : natural person 2 : the body of a human being <----Enjoy.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

2. the body of a human being.Being:1.Existence: "the railroad brought many towns into being".2.Living; being alive.Existence:The fact or state of living or having objective reality.So, that means you are agreeing with me that "human being" is a reference to a living human and not a dead human. Correct?If you are agreeing with me then the two terms have slightly different meanings. Correct?If A and B are correct, then thank you.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

the simplicity of this is that the fetus is a human specimen with human dna .
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

I am not sure if I want to classify it as a being yet. I believe it is human. But I like to think it is a being after it has been born.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Why do you not think it is a human? Or better yet a being? Being: something conceivable as existingA fetus is obviously in existence. But I like to think it is a being after it has been born.That does make any logical sense. If being simply means something in existence and the fetus exists then why say it isn't a being?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

We are talking about a human fetus, I still think it is human.Being: something conceivable as existingI wasn't using this definition. I don't consider something that hasn't been born yet higher than it should be.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

I don't consider something that hasn't been born yet higher than it should be.I don't understand. It is in existence. Well what is your definition?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Being born. Sorry for the sort of pun. I think you have to be born in order to be a being. I thought that would be obvious by now.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

The question becomes: "When is an organism (a human being) actually born in that respect? That is, "when does a human being first come into being (existence)?Consider scientific comments like this one: "This is why a single embryonic cell, born at conception, can differentiate into all the different structures of the body. So all the cells in the body have identical sets of chromosomes...."
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Ooh, more dishonest word use by clearly destroying the word birth. At least this time, you are definitely wrong. Birth is not at conception.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

How has the word 'birth' been destroyed by my asking you for clarification and for you to consider the fact that the word birth has more than one definition? It is you who is being dishonest when it is you who wants everyone else to ignore those other deffinitions and their applicabilities.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

You applied the definition of birth incorrectly, sorry. Your use of the word child has been accurate though. Of course in both instances you are trying to trick people.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

1. You haven't shown how I (or the scientists that I quoted) have used the word "birth" incorrectly. The "Big Bang" is thought to be the origin of or the "birth" of our Universe. Do you imagine a giant vagina with our Universe being pushed out of it?Conception is the "birth" of a human being in the way that the "big bang" is thought to be the "birth" of the universe. Is that too difficult for you to comprehend?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

You are the only person I have ever talked to that needs the word parturition to describe birth. You can continue to think you are right, but we have a word for that and that word is wrong.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

Let's see how honest you are Cartman. The words birth and born have more than one definition for themselves.True or False?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

True  Now, maybe you should use one of them instead of one that you have given it
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

I could cut and paste my previous arguments for you but why bother?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

any coming into existence; origin; beginningThis does not mean that every coming into existence is a birth. That's not how definitions work.I know why you have been led astray. I didn't see a reason to discuss it because you are too stubborn for words. Hehe, "for words", we are arguing over words, that's funny.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

any coming into existence; origin; beginningThis does not mean that every coming into existence is a birth. That's not how definitions work.Bwahahahahaha!Just for the comedic value alone, I would love to see your definitions for the word any and for you to show how the all inclusive use of the word any does not or can not mean every.