Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

know it's impossible for a Christian to believe someone might not actually believe your nonsense, but I simply don't.Believe or not is another for a different day.My focus was on a fake excuse.Nvm Case closed.Arguably Mary, but my point wasn't so much the God raped, but that he condoned it. In Deuteronomy God even gives clear permission to keep the women of the cities they fight. It also instructs if a man is caught raping a woman he simply needs to pay the father and marry the woman.You deviated at first, i pampered and now see where we are.The acts of man instead of the acts of God himself.Difference God(above the law), men(under the law)And yes following your deviation,It became not a sin at that moment only for particular reason by the command of God. He is the Judge and law.A country sentences people to death which is all the same murder, but the reason makes it right according to the law or country, so those who shoot are not even punished But doesn't give right to people at home to be shooting people by heart or of gutts, ........The Bible even says(those days) gays should be killed immediately when caught and their blood will be on their own heads.People are therefore excused by the law(God).It doesn't mean condoning.REASON is what determines what is right or wrong.People donate for the wrong reasons, people steal for the right reasons(ex. Child dying in the hospital not because they felt like it)And can be excused if well proven before the law.It isn't called condoning. Women kill to protect their kids from drunk husbands, if the law excuses it, it is for reason not condoning.You stated every action of God's becomes law, not man. Get your story straightIf so, then why did you relate a man's rape to God, and concluding it to law then, when it wasn't Him in the action.Get your questions straight.Okay, where can it be presented?Real world. Not a debate site.You will need real evidence with all your senses. And when you speak about it, you will be known as the newly mad man on loose.t's just as much nonsense as your godI will ignore that. You will answer later, not to me.There is material evidence for the existence of many men, Who is looking for those men? At least in this argument?what you cannot do is prove why this one is any differentAt least you proved something, you lack focus.We are examining beats by dre and you deviate to talk about JBL, SONY etc which is absolutely(undeniable) irrelevant to what is being discussed.Have you ever actually read the Bible?As you can see, am defending a part of it(about jesus)....how do you defend what you don't knowA red herring. I've made it known in many debates on this site I was a proud Christian for over 30 years, and I still own many Bibles. You did however, fail to address my statement.I know people who own cars but have never driven it or don't know anything about how a car.(engines, acceleration, etc)So about owning plenty bibles isn't a valid argument or else you wouldn't be asking such a silly question. Untill you admit you never had s bible, i won't address that.Of the 107 billion people that ever lived, only 7 billion are alive today.So? Ok i see it down there.........We don't have the bones of all 100 billion dead people so why is it surprising we don't have his.What You search is what you find.You google dog and you expect to find elephant?That is an illogical question.If you don't have proper questions, dont force it.Also, how would you determine with absolute certainty they even were his if you found them?You still distrust science?Okay so what language do you speak now?Even if he did flee he still would have eventually died,Yes, maybe.But let's stick to the story. so this is a pointless argumentYes you raised it. Ask proper questions. This sentence doesn't make any sense, but kicking someone out is entirely different from abandonment.Actually, it's entirely the same. They were entirely kicked out of the garden.(i call it abandoning)You never even addressed the point, much less "destroyed" it.You don't know when a question becomes usesless,huh?Learn to let go.....I don't even understand what you said.Find the word creating the relationship(the verb) between your question and my reply......Another baseless statement.A continuation.....Again, you have to actually address a statement to make the claim. Unfortunately for you there is plenty of archeological evidence supporting human life long before the timeframe of Adam and Eve.Now proof for jesus becomes adam and eve? That for a different time.Pls stay focused.Why? The creation account suggests God merely spoke the universe into existence, why must there be a process to simply remove a contamination?Even so, the universe wasn't created in just a day.....ah, have you ever had a biblee.?Let's say I was at a restaurant and my server brought over my drink. Unknown to me, my drink had been poisoned, but a man across the room had watched it happen, however decided not to tell me. Are you suggesting the witness was a gentleman because I didn't first ask him if it was poisoned?*This is why i keep asking if you ever had a bible when i see such silly questions from you.....When God clearly pointed out to them that the fruit was bad for their healthy and yet they went for it.They could eat of many others bit they chose the only they were warned from.