Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

"Because to claim that power must be a concession of the people is a valid argument only so long as one acknowledges that Her Majesty has any."Did I say she had absolutely no power? If I did that was a mistake. " I wonder if you understand how the British system of governance works."I am aware of basic things, but not very may details. I'd be grateful if you would explain the system for members in parliamentary to pass new laws. And what are the terms of a member in parliament?"It is not to govern, as you seem to believe."Whether her powers are in policy or executive powers, I hold that they should not be hereditary. "Again, here is the issue. The Queen has no legislative powers, so this quite simply is not a valid argument."But she hold executive powers, which I believe should be run in legislative fashion. "Democracy as a pure system is not an effective from of governance and cannot maintain order and stability. It would breed chaos and strife. What exactly do you find appealing about that?"I agree. I not for a pure democracy. I believe in rights, and in that belief comes a firm believe in law. Order will be maintained through law, and law won't be abused by being kept in check by rights. It is a theoretical system, but one that has not had its chance to be carried out. "Free, in this context, means unbound by authority"Okay, but that is not how I define it.I define freedom as unbound personal choice when not in conflict with rights or law.Maximum potential utility if you will. This way of use can be taken in a very bad way if used in system like communism, but with the system I have in mind it works well enough. "Should representation and all other forms of government be destroyed based on the universal history of abuse?"I have no effective rebuttal. I yield. " The libertarian world that you propose would not last for long before the physically strong would be overwhelmed by the organised and intelligent."Such problems are present in all ideologies. Never will I claim to have to perfect system, I just have the one that fits with how I view people and the world. "corporatocracy of the United States, the inevitable end of a purely democratic system under capitalism."I agree that that the thought and purpose behind our founding has been greatly twisted. "You have yourself declared this to be false, as there are no democracies."Democracy is not the only ideal in which the people are the source of power."And that is, precisely, none. There are no rights beyond those that are supported by those with the greatest strength"And? As long as the weak are disposed of through the intent of the people im fine. "As am I, but within an ordered society"I am as well, we just differ on the form of order. "but I think we should all strive for elegance in expression, especially in English, that most venerable and superior, king of all languages."Agreed. "If nothing more, they preserve something quintessentially English. You cannot expect to mourn its loss until it is gone"Okay, I admit I do not hold the tradition dear as you might. But in my opinion, such a position shouldn't be gained by birth. Elections should be held, at least once every generation.