azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Are you so blind that you can't that you are an instrument, a pawn, used by the terrorists to spread their hatred towards America. Oh wait, don't answer that. You do it willingly and knowingly ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

How am i an instrument. I dont beleive any radical beleifs,i dont support any crimes any side. I'm not spreading hatred towards America. I mean how can you say that. Mind my is free my friend. I say what i say cause see enormous suffering, islamic terroism is just response to that suffering and mistreatment. I dont support any terrorist, beleive me i dont supprt any of thsoe organisations, but i look at whose doing the most damage and im sorry but there really is only one answer to that. Your problem is you value Western blood alot more than middle eastern. You think its a much bigger crime is a Western is killed than if a thousand Iraqis die in some air raid, thats just collateral damage to you. Well i look at and it makes me sick to my stomach. Why can you not acknowledge that your country has done more wrong than any terrorist organisation.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

you value Western blood alot more than middle eastern. It's not that I value one over the other. It's that I am extremely prejudiced against stupid people.Let me explain. For decades, the terrorists have tried to change the Palestinian situation through terrorism. And here we are. Decades later and still..... nothing has changed. Albert Einstein once said, "Insanity is doing the sane thing over and over again and expecting different results." I call it stupidity.Anyone that expects to change America's international policy by stating, to anyone who will listen, that America is the largest terrorist organization the world has ever known, is an idiot. That tactic has never worked. A better tactic would be to tell the people of any middle eastern country to overthrow their oppressive, tyrannical government and replace it with a democratic government that will use the money (obtained from selling oil to the U.S.) to improve the standard of living of the people and invest it in the country's infrastructure. The U.S. doesn't care what the country's ruler does with the money. The U.S. only cares that the are no threats to the flow of oil.What benefit is there to the U.S. for ANY collateral damage? Do you really believe that America loves to inflict collateral damage?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding NO

1. War will never end. I believe it was Plato who said "Only the dead have seen the end of war".2. Terrorism is a form of war and violence.3. The question reads whether non-violence can completely end terrorism.4. Non-violence cannot destroy terrorism because the human condition does not allow for it.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You're probably right, but there's no reason we shouldn't work towards peace. Isolated acts of violence may continue, but with global cooperation peace between nations can exist (at least I hope).
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Thats like changing the saying don't bring a knife to a gun fight to don't bring a Kumbaya into a gun fight.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: Friends maybe

Take a knife to a gunfight and stab them while they're laughing. Muslim terrorists hold the belief that if they die in a war for God they will go to paradise regardless of past actions. Convince them that Americans hold nothing against Islam and they will have a much harder time recruiting albeit it's a bit too late for that now that we've entered a full on war.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: Peace is good

I think we all like peace and want peace. I wish we could destroy terrorism with non violence I really do, but it can't happen that way. However anything we can do with non violence we should.Does anyone really think we can get Osama Bin Laden and or take down the tali-ban with non-violence?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Yes....Just like we found Saddam Hussein...in a hole somewhere in Afghanistan or Pakistan.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Yes. With an educated populace, the Taliban would have nowhere to recruit from. The current Taliban would either kill themselves in terrorist acts (or get caught beforehand), or just die of natural causes in a few decades. With no recruiting pool, they can't survive.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

The reason we haven't had a major terroristic attack since 2001 is that the terrorists are trying to run from our military. If we suddenly try to make peace with them, they will go all out and attack attack attack. These radical Muslims do not care if we want to be friendly with them. They only want to kill the "infidels" and the "non-believers", regardless of friendship status!
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Allahu Akbar!!!
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

GO BACK TO BED AMERICA YOUR GOVERNEMENT IS IN CONTROL. GO BACK TO BED, HERES SOME AMERICAN GLADIATORS. YOU ARE FREE TO AS WE TELL YOU, YOU ARE FREE TO DO AS WE TELL Bill Hicks R.I.P.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You know...., who are you going to blame once the people in the Middle East get rid of their oppressive governments and they start fighting among themselves ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Youhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7hiiuSdT5o go on watch it you know you want to, its calling your name Joe, Joeee, Joooeeee.....
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

OMG! You want me NOT to listen to any propaganda except the one you send me? You're funny ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Ya im trying to brainwash you. My cult is low on members so this our new strategy, go onto social networking sites and rope people in with our crazy propaganda. Its the craziest method ever used, let me tell you what we do, we tell people the truth and hope that if they have a shred of compassions for their fellow man they'll listen and not dismiss it as propaganda cause it doesnt fit into their narrow view of the world.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Your so called "truth" is not my "truth" ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

How do you know that if you havent engaged with it.You pass judgement without knowing the full story.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Give it a rest. I already told you.1. I don't care.2. The truth lies in the middle. You're way out in left field.3. Your sources have a political agenda (read: propaganda).
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

1. You dont care because you dont have to care. You incapable of putting yourself in the shoes of the peoples were discussing.Ok, fair enough you're not a empathic person, you're incapable feeling compassion for your fellow man, your happy doing what your doing cause your one of the lucky ones i.e. born in the West.Thats fair enough if i blame you for that ill have to blame the whole of Western society.2. Ive already talked about this, i honestly beleive the truth doesnt lie in the middle, and i base that on the facts(not leftist propaganda like you want to beleive and begged you not to take my word for this but you seem so dedicated to living in bluissful ignorance that ill drop it after this)3. Again, i direct you to Noam Chomsky. Your small minded opinion thatv this man has an agenda only shows how little you know of him (and theres a good reason you dont know who he is as well). Becoming the 2nd most quoted author in history means something you obviously cant comprehend. It means that the facts you present in your books (again hes written over one hundred) are so incontrovertible that every other respected author uses them. Again, i absolutely beg you not to take my word for it, look the man up, make up your own mind.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Being the 2nd most quoted author in history means the liberals have to heavily rely on him because they've got no one else ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

What? I know this probably isnt meant to be a serious comment but really is that the only way you an justifly it to yourself.What does that even mean, do you even know. You say your truth is not my truth but there only one truth, you'd know that if you actually gave a fuck about the e truth
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

The truth is that human nature is what it is and you will be hard pressed to change it in any significant manner any time soon. Therefore, you're just wasting time ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Human nature, your still takin that crap.Ive already said i agree completely with you on that particular issue but to take the stance you take because of it i find quite pathetic. We cant win so why try, fair enough i can understand it alright.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

OK, now the next step is to realize that being passionate about something you are powerless against is frustrating (for me). Therefore, I don't get passionate about things I am powerless against because I hate feeling frustrated. If you can handle being frustrated that's fine. Just don't try to drag me to your level. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Ya, exactly me and those pescy liberals, as usual you got it in one Joe. Me and the liberals usual meet up at some ranchy bath house to discuss or evil plans, then we collect all our ball sweat in one big jug and we do like a little lottery.The person who wins gets fuckin drenched in the stuff while we all watch and wank furiously.Uhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!! Seriosuly man you dont know what your fuckin missin.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

? I have no idea what you're talking about .
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Noam Chomsky isnt propaganda if you studied his worl you'd know that.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Oh, please! OK, then, Glen Beck, Bill O'reilly and Rush Limbaugh are moderates ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You clearly can't see the difference so ill attemp to dscribe it to you. Those peopel you mentioned only support the interests of the giant corporations who own their souls even the most moderate people in your media can be tared with the same brush as your whole madia is corrupt. Noam Chomsky was voted the greatest intellectual alive. This man will go down in history, poeple will be studying him in philosophy, political science, sociology, etc., etc. courses long after both of us are dead. He is the second most quoted author in history, shakespeare is the 1st. This means the information he presents (leaving out the judgements he comes to based on it) is irreftutable, or as close to it as is humanly possible.Thats wht you dont seem to grasp, you think he has an agenda because he doesnt say what you agree with.What could his agenda possibly be, seriously i want to know. Why do think he holds the views he does. He disagrees with the entire politcal system in America, not liberals or conservative or otherwise. Anyway, you'll find if you want to.Again, though i think your happy living in ignorance
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You clearly can't seeI wear glasses so.... that may be part of the problem ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Well get new ones, fuckin hell do i have to tell you everything
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

The problem is that you don't have anything worth reading ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Then why you keep reponding, i mean i would have stopped posting to you along time ago if you had, so why continue if what i say isnt worth reading
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I have a reputation to maintain. Most people stay on this site for about a year. I've been here for almost 3 years now? I guess you haven't learned that you shouldn't try to teach a pig to dance. Nor have you learned that you shouldn't wrestle with a pig. You can't win and the pig likes it ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You clearly dont know me either, i grind people down over time. When i started college i did so with new friends i had made. They were from a much different background to myself. They were all reasonably posh, not very open minded kind of elitists but i worked on them. Over time they made an impression on me but i made a much beiiger impressoin onthem.Although if i knew you were nealry 50 i probably would nt have bothered, it does seem ive bitten off more than i can chew.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

So you make friends in order to grind them down ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

No, im sorry if thats the impression i gave you. My opinions are shaped by the info. i receive. I question that info. more than most, beleive me. This has lead me to become more aware than others(i hope that doesnt sound to egotistical, inevitably when you talk about yourself personal bias is unaviodable). Then i share this info./opnion based knowledge with people who i think are somewhat receptive and open-minded. Sometimes they reject sometimes they questoin it. When it works it workd well though cause not only to i change their minds on many critical issues but my own views are refined based on being put under such scrutiny. I admit my views are still far from correct, nobodies are, personal bias, emotinal bias etc. etc always gets in the way, but when you can look at things cynically, prahmatically, realistically and above all objectively(although pure objectivity doesnt exist as close as you can manage) you begin to see things a lot clearer. Sometimes someone needs to piont out how your views are wrong (thats what i attempted with you) other time you can come to those concluions yourself.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Your opinions are so warped against America that you can't see anything good that comes out of this country. I bet that as far as you're concerned Bill Gates is not a philanthropist. All the money he gives towards helping African nations nations get rid of disease is really a cover up so that he can take over, rape Africa and steal their natural resources.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Thats just not true. I have a deep respect and admiration for things your country has done, the movements produced within your own country etc etc. I have nothing against the American people, i beleive them to be badly brainwashed people who beleive in a lie. There news media is badly letting them down. The lie that America is a froce for good needs to be acknowledged as such. By the way there are exceptions to every rule, Bill Gates has done alot of good but that in no way negates any of the claim ive made about US corporatism.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

OK! Now we're getting somewhere. So when you rant and rave about America being an evil empire, you're talking about every American corporation....., because, I guess every Irish corporation is a force for good. Is that what you're saying? Or is it that every corporation on the planet is a blood sucking entity?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Firstly, there are no International Irish corporation, Glanbia foods used to be until the co-operative broke off and formed there own irish organisation. Or is it that every corporation on the planet is a blood sucking entity?The answer (at what i beleive in my heart) to this question is yes, all corporation are prodiminantly evil entites, ok. They do not exist to serve the masses, they exist to serve a priveleged few at the expense of the masses. Now im am speaking relatively here. I think on the whole this statement is trueLike if you've ever dabled in advanced statistics you may have heard of hypothesis tests, i think that in a hypothesis test where the null hypothesis is that the above statement is false, would have a p-value of below 0.05. Now the reason i single America out is becasue your American and you have disagreed with me about what i stated about your country from the very beginning, so really it wouldnt be much good talking about finlands crimes. Also, your country has done a lot more wrong than alot of others. When i say that what i mean is they have interferred wit other people from other countries, much more thn any other country. Also, capitiism, free market econimics, and the worlds dominant(most ruthless) corporations all emanate from the US. Also, these corporations control your geovernment, you have the illusion of a democracy, it not really what you think it to be. Admittedly its better than many other places but the corporations cant have the people realising how their being fucked in the ass everyday now can they. They thing is they dont care about anyone pver seas. Yes other corporations are just as bad, some based in Brazil are destrying the rainforest, the list is endless but the frustrations of someone like me will alweays predominantly be pionted at the US because they are the worst and that is where they were born.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

all corporation are prodiminantly evil entitesAt best, you sound paranoid. At worst, you sound like a delusional, fanatic. A lunatic out there on the fringe of society ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

At best your an idiot at worst your an idiot, your just an idiot im afraid.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Listen camel boy (C.B.) Your mother looks like a camel. Which is good because it shows that she is not concerned about society's high expectations of what women should look like.You would rather screw a camel than drive a car that gets low gas mileage.Your being associated with camels shows your solidarity with terrorists.In short, CB is the perfect name for you ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Hey CB, wasn't this your very first ad hominem attack? You're starting to repeat yourself and that is so boring. Don't you have any imagination? ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Now i guess your lack of imagination is contagious. Hey you know what you shoul try, its great for the imagination. Try sticking your head into the oven and turning on the gas, does wonders for your imagination.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Lol!!! I was drinking beer when I read that and beer almost came out of my nose. I admit, that was really good. OK, you win that one ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding NO

You must be on some serious meth to think that non-violence can end terrorism. What do you suggest Gahndi, should we go to the Tygris River and make our own salt?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

After 491 days and countless arguments (which I haven't read) to the contrary, I still chose this side ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Look, we've tried the whole 'peace' and 'non-violence' thingy time and time again. There's nothing that non-violence can do to stop the terrorism. They just want to fight, and they see non-violence as a weak and easily exploited trait. The only way we can stop the terrorism is with violence.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: I wish we could but it would not work

Dont forget to include state sponsored terrorism like that of the U.S. which is responsible for about the deaths of people on a gigantic scale. Ordinary run of the mill terrorism like alkida can never hope to compare to that. Think about over a million Iraqis have died since the invasion. Now they werent in a good position before that but still. 1/4 million died from the first gulf war and the sanctions imposed on Samdam (by the U.S.) as a result of it collectively punished the entire Iraqi people and caused the deaths of untold millions (look it up, its well documented, type killing the children of Iraq into youtube or else you have to trawl through amnesty international and WHO documents). I know ive only focued on Iraq but you could apply similar arguments to most countries outside the Western world and some inside.The amount of blodd on Americas hands no conventional terrorist can ever compare to and you'd be hipocrites to exclude it from your argument.Peace out.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Millions, huh? So American soldiers went into Iraq and killed over a million Iraqis? Are you sure you are not counting the Shiites killed by the Sunnies? Maybe you're also throwing in the Iraqis that got killed by Al Qaeda? And Iraqis that died of old age and natural causes? I'm just saying ;)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War Maybe it is you who should look it up, it's well documented. Peace out ;)