Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Firstly id like to say i agree with a large portion of this argument i just think your coming to the wrong conclusions. Just look at what you've said, at no point have you acknowledged that your country is guilty of anything. Thats your tax dollars at work my friend. As i said the greatest propaganda and indoctrination system ever create and its in existence currently in operation in the U.S. The only reason we have left and right in govenement is so people think they have both ends of the politcal spectrum, nothing could be further from the truth they are both controlled by the same puppet masters(CALLED BIG BUSINESS,MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND CONGLOMERATES) Have you ever read the book "a brave new world" by Aldous Huxley. Its like Orwells 1984 (which you must have heard of)except he proposes that governments of the future arent going to control their populations through violent repression, thats proved to be ineffective in the long term, at some piont the people organise and rebel. He proposes that they will use much softer methods but no less coercive.They will keep their populations happy (and unfufilled) and docile all the time, there would be no reason to rebel people would just be completely ignorant and no one would ever question the power of the state as there is an ideological belief imbued into each citezen from birth(Americanism, freedom fries, patriotsm, have you ever thought about that shit). They will also be kept docile (from thinking) by supplementing their human experience with mind altering drugs that numb the mind and the senses (PROZAC,~40% of U.S. adults take it regularly).Now the reason i bring this up is because i believe the American model to be the first prototype of this kind of society.You can call me whatever you want if it makes you sleep better beleiving im a nut job, i sure you will as this should be very hard for you to digest and there no way i can begin to describe why i believe this via this ineffective medium of communication.Again if your interested look up the book, the author see what you think for your self, im not telling what to think im merely making suggestions which you most likely wont take up as you probably dont have a high opinion of me given that i dont share your views.Now onto your actual argument as is largely correct in content but fundamentally flawed and selectively excluded the U.S. from blame.Ill start with egypt, people are willing to tolerate a great deal before rebelling against their government, this well known by the U.S. government, they been seeing how far they can push poor depreived civilian populations for a long time (50-60yrs). This is the exactly what happened in egypt and tunisia. Food prices shot up, many peope could not even afford to feed their families and that was the straw that broke the camels back. Now you havent even entertained the possibility this regime survived as long as it did due to U.S. backing but this is the reality whether you want to beleive it or not, im not the only one saying this, the whole fucking world is open your eyes for fucks sake. I wonder why. You immediately blame the corrupt Egyptian people. I will openly admit that midlle eastern people are just as flawed as those in the U.S. (humans are humans no matter where you are) im not claiming anything else but your still failing to see my piont, no middle eastern country or peope has done the things you've done.Your country is to blame as without its backing (with disgusting amounts of blood money funneled into the army and corrupt egpytian hands) this governemnt (Mubaraks) would not have lasted long and probably woudnt even have gotten into power in the first place, sadat who would not have entertained the U.S. so its very likely he was assinated as the behest of the cia (you can label it a conspiracy theory and it may well be but sadat wasnt willing to tolerate what Isreal was doing and then hes conveniently assinated and Mubarak takes his place??hmmm?). When your empire finally does crumble and lets say China replaces it then it will most likely be the subject of my (or people like me) criticism as China will most likely exert themselves in other countries as well when their powerful enough to do so but that hasnt happened yet. So why do you not blame your governemt becasue you dont want to face the truth ive said this before."I'm not afraid of terrorists or radical Muslims and I don't care who created them." of course you dont care who created them, cause it was your own fucking government. is it really that hard to accept, cant you just say it. Your government funded the mujahadine in afganihistan which metamorphosised into alkiada. Its a well known and widely acknowledged fact that U.S> foreign policay is responsible for fannjing the flames of hatred and breeding terrorism. Most people have acknowledged this (even in your ownj government) why cant you. If the U.S. kept its hands off what wasnt theirs radical islam would wither and die, can you not see that, come on. And there falgrant support for isreal who are currently commiting genocide against the palestian peolpe. You need to at least try and wake up, you have to want to to to be able to but i dont think you do.