Debate: Get this over with...why do you believe/disbelieve in God?
Side: I believe because.....

Ah paragraphs now we're talking. (; "Either stick to the topic or start a new debate"The debate we're having is different than the debate we are in. I guess we could have this debate elsewhere but I don't really want to. All of the sudden you care about the semantics of this website. Right. "your entire argument here is based on your arbitrary definition of debate."Debate Definition: "A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward."Your "argument" was not formal. And as I said it was weak. This is what we're talking about. I know you don't like it. But who cares. (:  Argument Definition:(yeah you can make fun of me for using google)"An exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one: "I've had an argument with my father".A reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong."The second definition in particular applies here. By this definition you literally had no argument. Ouch. "I'm also not trying to change the topic we are discussing, we have already moved quite far away from the debate topic."Yes you are! And "we" where never discussing the topic of God we were discussing the legitimacy of your argument. "I think it's funny that you believe you have me backed in to a corner and that I'm losing."I think it's funny too. (; "My original post has more points than yours."Really?..Explain. "Furthermore, your definition of a weak debater is also arbitrary, I'd say that within a debate, sticking to the topic is fundamental, which is something I see you are unable to do."What?! You and me are having(and have been having this whole time) a completely separate discussion. What a cop out. "in order to explain to you that long winded arguments do not make good arguments just because they are long."When did I ever say that? When? "It was not my intention to give you the impression that I do not read longer posts""barely anyone reads long posts on here" -you. That's a little misleading then. "1,I am a weak debater, because, by your definition my post was too short.2,If I did construct a longer argument you wouldn't read it simply because it was mine.3, I wouldn't have to refute all arguments for reasons to believe in a God, even though I've stated I've no reason to, because obviously that would be stupid.1 and 2 contradict each other, and 3 contradicts itself."1. It doesn't have to be my definition. 2. Oh come on now. I love reading your arguments. (; This isn't personal! Ok I did say no when you asked me if I would read it but it was a joke. (; 3. The thing is that a proper argument would be stating why you have no reason to. Heck it doesn't even have to be a long post(well... longer than a sentance but you get what I'm saying) just give reason for not having a reason. It's like this; I have no reason to go to the grocery store because I have food in my refrigerator. It wouldn't make any sense to go to the store right now. I don't have any room in my refrigerator. By the time I ate my other groceries my new ones would go bad. etc etc.  Get it? -and there could be lots of reasons. That's just a tiny example. Notice how I didn't have to list every single argument in existence why going to the store isn't necessary.