Debate: Is global warming an issue?
Side: No

Your argument for those facts are that you think my sources aren't credible? People like you make me laugh.-Go ahead and look up ClimateGate. There will be multiple sources so you can go ahead and pick the most credible, in your opinion. My source for that is The Wall Street Journal.-I can't make up the failed predictions and quotes from NASA scientists. Look them up for yourself. I gave you the facts, now you can go verify them since you're too ignorant to look beyond what scientists told you without any actual proof.-There are plenty of credible people who know that global warming is not caused my human actions. The definition of global warming is the increase in the earth's temperature that, according to most scientists, is occurring as a result of the carbon dioxide that is produced when fossil fuels are burned collecting in the atmosphere and trapping energy from the sun. That's a definition straight from a textbook. Notice how is says MOST SCIENTISTS, not all. Not all scientists agree with you and to say that all scientists think that we cause global warming is ignorant. There are plenty of scientists who say that we ARE NOT the cause.-The fact that over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition saying that humans are not the cause of global warming can't be denied. Go ahead and google it for yourself if you still don't believe me.-You're telling me that I don't understand the basic fundamentals of science, but you're ignoring the facts that I'm stating about specific heat. If YOU understood the basic fundamentals of science, you would realize that what I'm saying about the specific heats is true. But you choose to believe something without any actual scientific evidence. You're preaching it as a fact simply because scientists have said it. In case you didn't know, not all science is true. In fact, one of the biggest things about science is to keep trying to disprove already believed theories to strengthen what is known to be "true."-I never even mentioned anything about gravity because that's not the main focus here. All you're doing is taking what I said, twisting it, and then saying something irrelevant. While doing all of this, you fail to actually prove me wrong of anything. I also notice how you don't have a rebuttal to many things that I am saying. So I'm just going to assume that you don't have an answer for it (I'm not surprised). Back to what I was saying, the little amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere cannot do a thing. There's just too little of it to do anything. Even IF it was harmful, there's not enough to make any difference, especially in the temperature of earth.-If you're going to say that carbon dioxide is harmful, then explain to me how water vapor hasn't killed us by now. If everything you're saying is true, WATER VAPOR is the thing to worry about, NOT carbon dioxide.-I have not mentioned anything even remotely relevant to politics. All I'm doing is simply giving you the scientific facts, which you can't seem to comprehend.-The fact that you're denying me on how the temperature of earth has not changed and the polar ice caps are increasing just means that you are living proof of someone who fell into the propaganda. Do. The. Research. Look up further what I am telling you if you do not believe me.-You're treating scientists like they are gods. Whatever they have to say, you aimlessly follow them and what they say.-Call me a conservative, call me a liberal, call me a republican, call me a democrat, call me whatever you want. I don't believe something just because the politicians said it was true. I don't label myself with a group just because they said it was true. I'm not like you. I'm an individual who did the research myself. You should try it sometime.