azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

I'm not saying God was wrong, only that God is bringing about the fulfillment of his purposes in various ways at various times.Seems contradictory to have condoned war after commanding that his people not kill and then sending his son to say that killing is wrong.But when Jesus came, GOd's SON, he instructed the first century Christians NOT to engage in war, that they should live by the brotherly love principleThat's all very well, why not just live by that in the first place. COnstantine was a pagan politician, firstly. HE was the one who decided Christian doctrine, and wrongly so. God is the only one with that authority.So, do you still believe the bible is the inerrant word of God?A true Christian does not PRACTICE deviation from belief, altho they may sin, become SINCERELY repentant, CHANGE their BEHAVIOR, and be forgiven.Does this count for all sin?Yes, the Old Testament is trustworthy.So it's laws and teachings must be upheld, or is it only when they don't contradict the teaching of Jesus.Christians do not live by the Jewish Law as given to Moses, although many of the PRINCIPLES embodied in that Law were REPEATED for Christians. These principles have never become null and void.So why are the Jews the chosen people? Surely God would value steadfast adherence in the face of challengers, especially given all that he and the Jews had been through.We have not completely switched to a new set of laws through Jesus. As above, many of the PRINCIPLES of the old Law were REPEATED for Christians. But Jesus FULFILLED the old Law with his death, and hence, it has completed the purpose for which God made it.So, you've picked and chosen those parts which make you feel easy about being essentially modern Jews.Jesus was an affront to the Sadducees and Pharisees' teachings because they had perverted, subverted, God's original Law with weighty add-ons.Such as?Jesus set them straight on these things, for which they murdered him.Was Jesus' death not the fulfilment of prophecy and his ultimate goal?Oh by the way, what's with all the fuckin caps, honestly?
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

But when Jesus came, GOd's SON, he instructed the first century Christians NOT to engage in war, that they should live by the brotherly love principleThat's all very well, why not just live by that in the first place. --I agree, that is what God wanted mankind to choose to do--live by the brotherly love principle. But mankind, when presented with the opportunity to be selfish and greedy, chose not to do so.You see, what happened was this: Satan was greedy first, wanting to take God's place in the eyes of the first humans. He wanted God's worship for himself. So he tricked them into choosing greed over love of their creator, and it worked. He raised the issue of whose rulership was right--could mankind rule themselves effectively, without God, or could they not? That is the great question that the past six thousand and more years have played out, and it is about to be answered once and for all time.The brotherly love principle will win out in the end, just as God wanted it to do before our first parents were created.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

Consider the following:If there was no religion, would there not be no wars about religion?
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

If there was no religion, there may not be wars over religion, but there would still be wars, caused by the same thing--greed and thirst for power.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

Doesn't that already happen?Oh look, Atheists are at fighting each other again for who disbelieves in God the most!Oh wait, that never happens.No religion= less reasons for people to go at war. Less reasons for people to go at war= less wars.Understand this logic?
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

It is not the religions` fault since it was the men who decided it. Don`t you think it is a poor excuse to wage war on something because someone told you to? Some believers just use that as an excuse to get what they want. Its like making a cover story about your parents so that you can ditch school.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

If there were no religions, there might not be wars about religion, but there would still be wars.Wars are due to GREED. Religion is only the secondary issue.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

We are not talking about Greed wars.Greed already exists.Wars for Greed are already happening.But removing religious wars will at least give us NO secondary issue.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

Religious wars should not happen at all--at least any involving "Christianity."The fact that they do is due to GREED. ALL wars are caused by GREED first, and religion is only the secondary issue. Religious wars involving Christianity happen because the warmongers have lost their Christianity, are not living up to its principles as taught in the Christian Bible, and are putting GREED in first place in their lives, which amounts to idolatry.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

Religious wars should not happen at all--at least any involving "Christianity."This debate is not only about Christianity. It is about other religions too.The fact that they do is due to GREED. ALL wars are caused by GREED first,World War I, an Arch Duke was assassinated due to his people disliking the changes he was planning to make on their country. They wanted to retain their own independence as a country, so they assassinated him, sparking distrust in countries and alliances, leading to the first World War. The American War of Independance; was about Independence. See, not all wars are about greed.and religion is only the secondary issue.When a famous Shiek declared a Fatwah (Death sentence) on Salman Rushdie for disgracing the name of their God, he did so despite gaining anything except for murdering a man who insulted their 'religion of peace'.Religious wars involving Christianity happen because the warmongers have lost their Christianity, are not living up to its principles as taught in the Christian Bible, and are putting GREED in first place in their lives, which amounts to idolatry.I don't know what the hell you're on about. In the Crusades, they were driven by religion, justifying their killings by God. If they didn't have a religion to give them a drive and justify their killings, they would just be wasting their time. And the Christian Bible? It has genocide, slavery and child-murdering.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

Someone's been up-voting all the people that said false. Good man!
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

Well, people started religions, then because people decided to go to war over religion. Saying it was only people is about as much bull as saying "Guns don't kill, people do." Well, if it weren't for the fucking guns, people wouldn't have been shot. And, if there were no religions, fascism, racism, hundreds of wars and disputes that have occurred through out mankind, would not ave occurred. Yes, people kill other people, but those people were prompted, inspired by religion. So false, religion has been responsible for, over the course of humanity, billions of deaths.Put that in your cross and smoke it.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: True

Saying it was only people is about as much bull as saying "Guns don't kill, people do."Guns don't just get up and shoot people. Blaming inanimate objects for the actions of people is very irrational. Blaming the ideas of something for the actions of people is equally irrational. People can choose to pick up guns and shoot them and me being a racist or fascist cannot rob me of my choice to be violent.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

Well yes, all religions don't kill people, but people holding the ideas that DO kill people do. I don't see a difference between saying "people believing that it's right or just to kill XYZ killed them" and "people killed XYZ"
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

The way I see it, religion has. Religion exists within the people. It doesn't exist by itself. If no one believes in the things listed under religions and it's not talked about, it's nothing but an idea. (for example, I write about the belief that pill bottles can eat and call it pillbotism, it doesn't really exist as a religion though). When people say religion doesn't cause it, they usually are trying to back a stance that people can still believe in religion and it doesn't kill people. Sure, it depends on the religion though. If a religion involves killing, their same stance doesn't stand.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

It's probably false!Religion is one of the reason why war still exist. All people have different religion it means to have different view for everything. They couldn't find a compromission. That's why they fight with each other.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

In my view this is completely wrong statement.If there was no any misunderstanding between religious there were no any war.
Debate: True or false. Religion never caused any wars, it was only people
Side: False

The people represented those Religions so Religion was the main motivation.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

The amount of hormones that transgender people take disqualifies them from being "battlle ready". Straight people are disqualified for lesser reasons.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

You don't have to be on hormone therapy if you are transgender.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

And yet, many are, and you've completely and conveniently ignored the suicide statistics.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

This argument had nothing to do with suicide. This is why you are a terrible debater. Besides, the American government had never given a single fuck about suicide rates of soldiers. Why now? You are making the same arguments Democrats make. Criminals shouldn't be allowed to have guns, right? What is the answer? Do you ban guns or do you ban criminals from having guns? Transgenders on hormone therapy aren't battle ready. What do you do? Ban transgenders, or ban hormone therapy?
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

You don't think a 1 in 2 chance of suicide would be genuine concern, let alone pre screening faze of the no1 military super power in the world?If you don't understand it, just be happy you're not up against it.....
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

No. I am not a liberal bitch. Sorry. I don't think safe spaces and war go together.Answer the fucking question you pansy ass bitch.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

You send off 100 trannys - over 40 of them will kill themselves...Not much of a military super power ay chief...
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

I am sure we have sent at least 100 trannies over there. Bring me the statistics on suicides in the military. Again though, you cowardly avoid the question I posed. Pussy.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

Well why don't you provide the statistics for trannies in the military....Do you feel tough calling someone a pussy over the net lol
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

No, I don't feel tough calling a cowardly pussy a pussy. Just stating facts. There is no reason to provide statistics, you don't actually disagree with me, you are just stupid. I can't fix stupid.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

I just realized the title of your debate said transsexuals. I believe you are right about transsexuals. Trump did make the correct decision about them. But he also decided on people who aren't transsexuals, which you don't understand and that's why you will always be wrong.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

Dumb dumb dumb....There are people in this world without specific gender genitalia.This does not make them 'transexual'It makes them a mutation of the general Human species...You're lost in biology and semantics champ....
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

There are people in this world without specific gender genitalia.This does not make them 'transexual'Correct. I was not talking about them. Dumb shit.makes them a mutation of the general Human species...Why are you bringing them up? You said that they aren't transsexual. I said transsexual. Why are you discussing people who I was not talking about even according to you? You're lost in biology and semantics champ....Lost in semantics? You told me that you believe that people in the world without specific gender genitalia are not transsexuals, then you tell me how you have included them as transsexuals. The only reason I would be lost is because you aren't talking about what you say you are talking about.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

Male - Female - MutationYou fall under one of these 3 categories...It's that simple, didn't mean to rock your world...
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

Cool. We have to get more complicated than that for transgender. You oversimplifying the situation proves nothing.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

I'm not over simplifying anything...Your argument isn't with me, it's with biology and science, I'd take a water bottle.....
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

Biologically transgenders are male or female, not a mutation. You want to treat males differently than males. With your oversimplification it makes no sense.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

" You want to treat males differently than males."No, not at all.Why? Do you?If in fact your problem is so petty you just want to change the definition of 'male', that's fine!....We can play your game too.Only 'selam' are allowed into the military, and you do not fit the criteria, whats wrong?
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

2 simple questions:What do transgender woman (born a man, but thinks they are a woman) count as under your classification system? Male, female, or mutation.Do you think that someone who says their gender is different than their biological sex can be allowed into the military?
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

1) For starters they're not 'transgender women', they are Males,Males with a mental condition or impairment that needs to be addressed.(Especially considering they're killing themselves off at an almost 1 in 2 rate, clearly a serious mental health issue, if not epidemic, in the trans community...)2) Maybe, Probably, Yes.I'm sure there are a lot of nutcases in the military, just ask your cross dressing, killer mate Colonel Russell Williams...lol What's your point?You're not helping your case bro...lol
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

1) so, you acknowledge that transgenders are males, so oversimplifying everything to males, females, and mutation was fucking stupid.2) So, you acknowledge that you think something Trump doesn't think which means you are a fucking idiot for adhering with him.What's your point?My point is that you don't think before you type anything complicated.You're not helping your case bro...lolMy case is that you are a fucking idiot. Case closed.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

Bit worried about you, if you don't want to play within the parameters of logic, your loss...
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

You aren't using any logic. I have proven that.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

You are disregarding science and biology because you 'feel' like it.Real logical....lol
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

You haven't shown that at all. In fact, you proved the opposite according to your beliefs. You are too fucking stupid to understand your own thoughts, so start there before you move on to biology.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

There is no evidence. If he had commissioned research from his government into the costs of transexuals in the military, and then come to that conclusion, then I could respect his decision even if I didn't agree with it. As it is though he has had a bit of a chat with some generals then delivered a one liner on twitter about it. As with most things he says, it is a nothingness. What is there to agree with him? There is nothing - as is evidenced by the fact that Bronto is now randomly talking about high rates of suicide with transsexuals - which is probably not something that Trump has even considered when he delivered his one liner.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

No evidence?Biology...Women aren't allowed on the front lines because they on average biologically inferior.Women who claim to be men, aren't allowed, for the same reasons.FYI - e.g. Hormones does nothing to change your bone densityIf a female was injured on the front line, a male, on average, could carry them out.If a male was injured on the front line, a female, on average, could not carry them out.Your rant is retarded lol
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

1) Trump wasnt talking solely about front line combat. 2) His reasoning wasnt anything to do with the notion that transsexuals are weaker than non-transsexuals.3) Women ARE allowed in front line combat http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/03/458319524/pentagon-will-allow-women-in-frontline-ground-combat-positions Oh and:4) Hormones DO increase bone density https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098904/ So.. every one of your points were false. It is actually quite impressive to be 100% wrong when you make multiple points.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

1 and 2 would be your interpretation, he could easily say that is what he talking about.3 that's cute, saying they can, doesn't mean they should or will, other than 'cannon fodder', but only the ugly ones...4 Bone density was ONE example, hormone treatment does NOT increase bone density, certainly not to the level of the average male bone density... lol, You are just wrong.You still haven't answered why you would want two genders of soldiers,one with the average ability to carry any wounded soldier off the battle field,and one with out that ability...WAITING...lol
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

1and 2 would be your interpretation, he could easily say that is what he talking aboutRead his tweets. He did say what he was talking about.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

Wow - strange somebody would be referring to tweets as executive orders.....Or do you just nit pick everything trump has ever said to use against him?
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

Wow - strange somebody would be referring to tweets as executive orders....Things that don't happen are strange. Good to know. Or do you just nit pick everything trump has ever said to use against him?No, I use what Trump says to know what Trump says, you fucking idiot.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

"No, I use what Trump says to know what Trump says, you fucking idiot."So in your world no one possesses the ability to learn and change their opinion, or even lie....K."Things that don't happen are strange. Good to know."lol What?My point is trump's tweets might not reflect his executive orders...Isn't this reasonable given one of your other rants against trump tweeting out details of military tactics....:/ lol
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

So in your world no one possesses the ability to learn and change their opinion....K.Only a fucking idiot would come to that conclusion. Shame. The fact that you are determining what Trump currently thinks based on his future thoughts is also completely fucking stupid.My point is trump's tweets might not reflect his executive orders...Yeah, and your point is worthless since your accusation had nothing to do with your point.Isn't this reasonable given one of your other rants against trump tweeting out details of military tactics....:/ lolNo, it is not reasonable to have the public determine what the military should decide. The military should be making military decisions.
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: He did

Lol What? You're basing what trump thinks on his tweets to the public...How much of a narrow minded sheep could you be?I say Trumps tweets don't necessarily reflect his executive orders, nor should they....What's wrong with that? Going slow enough? Or do you want the pres to tweet everything he plans to do first....And Vice versa.....lolThe military should be making decisions based off the best interested of the people it protects, wouldn't the people, themselves, know their best interests, or have their best interests at heart?Who makes the decisions then? Put it to a vote? Well...Trump...Voila... :)
Debate: Trump made correct decision on transexuals and military
Side: I need a reason to hate him

Imaging things that aren't true didn't make you open minded.say Trumps tweets don't necessarily reflect his executive orders, nor should they....That wasn't your original argument. You claimed err can't know what he is thinking.Going slow enough?You don't even understand when people answer questions you ask. Moron.Or do you want the pres to tweet everything he plans to do firstI want this president to stop tweeting.The military should be making decisions based off the best interested of the people it protects, wouldn't the people, themselves, know their best interests, or have their best interests at heart?Absolutely fucking not. The middle class votes for tax breaks for the lower class out the upper class depending on their political party. Voters frequently go against their own best interests.Who makes the decisions then? Put it to a vote? Well...Trump...Voila... :)If his executive order ends up changing, he didn't make any decision.