Debate: Should people have abortions?
Side: Yes, its not even alive

"And the end result is a beautiful child"that is not how symbiosis works.two interacting organisms can either be++ mutualist+0 Commensalist00 noninteractingo- amensalist-- competitivethe fetus gains because it receives nutrientsthe mother gains because the baby develops?in terms of symbiosis, the mother and the fetus are separate organisms. both of the interactions result in a gain for the fetus.from a psychological point of view, the mother may be happybut a symbiotic analysis still suggests that a fetus is parasitic."If it wasn't worth while for the mother, then why do so many women desire to have children (multiple children as well)?"Perhaps for some people it is worthwhile. After all, people are programmed with a maternal clock that encourages them to have children. However, if it was unquestioningly worthwhile, why do so many women even WANT to abort a baby?"I contend the return is quite adequate, in fact I believe it supersedes the negative by far."if the mother is happy because the fetus develops, congratulations. I am not suggesting that every baby should be aborted. However, if the mother is not happy and wants an abortion, the baby is obviously not making her happy, and therefore there is no benefit to counteract the many negative effects.which, even under your hand-picked definition, would result in the embryo as a parasite.since the only people getting abortions are people who are not feeling maternally happy, it would be safe to say that all fetuses that are being aborted are parasitic.Someone who would even consider a child to be a parasiteby the technical definition, a fetus IS a parasite- regardless of how I view any given fetus."This kind of selfish logic is what leads to so much sin...Perhaps if these murderers (abortionists) would consider someone outside themselves, then we would have a much better society"what kind of selfish logic?How am I being selfish? I am arguing the right for people to be entitled to their own body. As a male, I do not have a uterus from which to grow a fetus, nor a fetus to expel from my body.Obviously, I am thinking of other people: people with both uteruses and fetuses. And I am defending them from people like you who want to control them and force them to act against their own will.Isn't it funny, the more liberal (lack of morals)At first I wondered why you did not leap to merriam webster dictionary to prove a point. allow me to do this for you.Definition of LIBERAL1a : of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts b archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth2a : marked by generosity : openhanded b : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way c : ample, full3obsolete : lacking moral restraint : licentious4: not literal or strict : loose 5: broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms6a : of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalismb capitalized : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectivesHey, i guess that according to definition 3, liberal does mean lacking morals. Except for the fact that this definition is marked as obsolete.which means that it is no longer in use.so, the other definitions of liberal meanthe terms that are not obsolete, and referencing the liberal ideologies, includesecuring individual freedoms in a non-authoritarian government.Since you seem to be anti-liberal, I suppose that would make you wantindividual restraintauthoritarian governmentrather than "moral""the world gets the more crimes and problems we face."where are you getting this data?Armenia, one of the most liberal societies in the world, has a crime rate of 4.03889 per 1,000 people and Canada, also far more liberal than the United states, has a crime rate of 75.4921 per 1,000 people whereas the US has a crime rate of 80.0645 per 1,000 people please, I would like to know your source.