azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Again, adoption should be a choice, not a must. It should be made available as an option.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

No adoption is a must. If the child is alive, he or she deserves to live. You are certified as an attempted murderer. You belong in jail for this. Fetuses are, proven by science, living human beings in development. Once he or she is born, it's still illegal to kill the child. Either way, you're not getting away with this.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: it depends on the situation

Alright look no abortion isn't good,but you no what what if a 16 year old girl made a mistake and got pregnant,and she can't support the baby,so she wants to abort it,because the baby would have a bad life,she should be allowed to,yea it was her fault for being stupid but,that was what happened and in a way she would be protecting the baby.Or if someone got raped and got pregnant why the hell would you make someone keep that reminder of that experience its there life let them make a choice.I understand if you just keep having sex and aborting the baby then that's horrible but in certain situations sorry its necessary,and its not your life so but out.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Even if the law stopped the woman from aborting her fetus, I wonder whether the life of the baby would be normal and happy as the others. Abortion is both for the baby and the mother.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

.................................................................Abort Banning Stuff...............................................................
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Before the fetus can digest milk. Before the time when the fetus could actually be kept alive by somebody else other than its mother and her blood. Nobody else should have a say but its mother. You can say it's a member of society, but really it is not. It is only the property of its mother until society can keep it alive without her. Society must not make laws that affect things outside of its control. One city should not make laws for another city.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

I believe the person herself should be given a free will to decide whether to abort or not, banning abortion does not give her an option.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: it depends on the situation

In our society's view today abortion is something to be outlawed. Most of the logic behind this stems from the Bible's teachings unfortunately, leading to yet another flawed belief. Abortion is a thing that should be upheld on a case by case basis. You can't argue that it should be banned because the baby has feelings and such, but on the same note you can't just flat out say that Abortion is a great thing because it can help the people having the baby. By going on a case by case basis and comparing statistics such as: age, income, education, living situations, etc.... I believe the problem of abortion would be solved.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

some people have sex for leisure without the use of condom.The excitement are stronger than them.so why do they need to have a baby...
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Who has control over a pregnant womens life...she does because something is going good in her life and she doesn't want to mess that up by having a baby not saying having a baby is a burden (i love babies) but you can't control all of life but you can some what control what happens to you..
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

It shouldn't be banned, but restricted to ONLY the women who really need it for something like Medical purposes.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: it depends on the situation

I don't think it should be banned because like if you don't think its right - don't do the abortion. But they're are teenager outs there who are having babies and if they continue with the 9 months its will ruin their lives. Everyone should make their own choice to do what they want with their baby
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

You can just put the kid up for adoption. Is it really that hard?
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

You put this on the wrong side of the debate. Look at the sides on the top.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: Unbiased facts

I believe that what I have to say has not been said before. I believe that abortion should not be banned, although the facts that I will introduce may complicate the entire debate. Every time a person masturbates, doesn't he release about 50-500 million sperms each time, killing many? Every time a girl is born, isn't she born with two million eggs? The killing of potential lives occur every time a man ejaculates or a women menstruates.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

If a woman/girl is in danger of dying from having a baby, and was either raped or unaware of the fact that she was having sex (because they have never been educated), then they should have the right to not get physically hurt from having the baby or waste 9 months of their life, having to take time off from work to care for a baby she will give up anyway–if it even survives. If she doesn't die from having the baby, she will still be in a position of a weaker person. She will be less fit, and might even lose her job because she had to take a maternity leave.My mother was 26 when she got pregnant with her first child. My father and she were very happy–until 4 months in when she found out that her baby, who she had already named Sarah, had a severe heart condition, where even if it did survive past birth (less than 1% chance), would have serious handicaps its entire life. Is it fair to cause Sarah to feel complete pain and suffering her entire life? At least with the abortion that my mother got, Sarah could feel no pain. She wanted that baby more than anything or anyone else in the world, and her heart was broken that she could not deliver the joy to Sarah that Sarah had first given to her. For three years my mother did not try to have a baby again, and those three years were the hardest of her life.I agree that it's horrible for a woman to abort a child because they can't afford it, or don't want it, in those cases they should put the baby up for adoption. But if the baby or the woman is in extreme danger, then the woman has the right to choose. If you honestly think that it could be legalized for rape, but not for anything else, then how would you judge if it were rape or not? Even if the person could get consent from a judge, by then the baby would be even closer to being born and have more nerves that could feel the pain. Abortion must be either legal or illegal, and it is unfair to cause people like my mother to have even more emotional suffering. So I cast my vote for abortion being legal.P.S. I may only be a 14 year old boy, but I have extensive knowledge on political fronts and current events, and my education thus far has been one of the best available to a public school. It has also been scientifically proven that children on average can see the correct answers to problems more easily than adults if given the same amount of knowledge because they have less emotional backgrounds that will impair their logic.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

I am actually pro-abortion but pro-choice will suffice. Human beings are moral agents, moral agents are moral because we are perceivers and valuers, the ability to perceive and value is only possible when we are conscious. it is therefore our being consciousnes that gives us moral agency. Prior to and independent of our consciousness (and by consiousness, I mean both waking and sleeping levels), our bodies are only able to be classified as human insofar as moral agency is concerned. The term "human-being" really only applies to humans that embody all the distinctions which are sufficient for moral agency. It is only then that we are truly identifiable as human-beings. a hand that is detached is not a human being, an eye, an ear, a heart, leg, etc... these are all just part of the whole, and even when assembled we are not yet a person unless we have the conscious element. Since consciousness only becomes possible at the onset of the third trimester ~ 26 weeks, it is immoral to kill, what I would then call a child. Prior to consciousness the fetus is a fetus, not having moral agency because it lacks the sufficient condition of personhood. Many people like to think about potentiality arguments with regard to a fetus, that it could become conscious. However, potential doesnt relate to the here and now and are therefore invalid insofar as the moral status of the action (abortion) is concerned. Potentiality arguments actually are appropriate as justifications contrary to pro-life opinions because they are valid when speaking of a fetus that will not be aborted, this is because it will almost certainly gain consciouness. For females that are too young to be mothers due to their immaturity as humans - generally thought of as anything younger than the age of majority (18) but also could extend to any age since mental and emotional maturity are only related to age in childhood adolescence and young adulthood - the potential life of the child has a 98-99% chance of being very impoverished both developmentally and with regards to being a productive member of society. The potential life will likely suck a lot. Thus... If moral agency is not established and the life will likely suck, abortion is the ideal choice. Abortion is an a-moral action (not having moral status) prior to the onset of consciousness. So in light of this people should be having more abortions. I think it is more responsible to abort a child that is unwanted and who's life will probably suck, than it is to not. the notion of responsibility should always be predicated upon the quality of the potential child's life - if its life will likely be impoverished it is irresponsible to have it. "Taking responsibility for the mistake of not using protection" is a bad way to think of it.So I say ...- Be moral, have an abortion (not a joke)
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Abortion is murder. Everyone has the right to live .
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

I think that you put this argument on the wrong side of the debate. Please check.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Though i don't think i would be able to get an abortion because i hate big medical procedures i don't see why other people shouldn't or can't. There is not a limit on how many children a women can have, meaning if a women gets an abortion that is not one less child she can have on the future. Most only want 2 or 3 she can still have those 2 or 3 children. At the stage of pregnancy when abortions happen the baby obviously wouldnt be able to live if it was taken out of the womb that early, so is it really considered alive in the womb even if it has a heartbeat. It isn't until the 6th or 7th month that baby might have a chance of surviving if it is taken out early. People say that if it was a mistake you should have been more careful and should deal with it. But if there is a way to fix it it why is it bad? Abortion is in no way an easy route there are consequences and it is punishment enough for a mistake. And if the baby was formed without the mothers consent she whould be able to get rid of it as to not be reminded of the forced father.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

1. Women have a right to do what they want with their body.2. What if a women is raped and gets pregnant? so she just has to live with a messed up child?3. The fetus is not really sentient until it comes out
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Women have a right to do what they want with their body.Yes they do, but the child inside of them is not part of their body it is a separate living being.What if a women is raped and gets pregnant? so she just has to live with a messed up child?This scenario does happen, however, it is much rarer that most believe, most abortions are from irresponsible sex but regardless it is still no reason to kill a human.The fetus is not really sentient until it comes outIt is arguable that they are not conscious, however, just because they aren't does not mean they are not alive or do not matter.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

This scenario does happen, however, it is much rarer that most believe, most abortions are from irresponsible sex but regardless it is still no reason to kill a human.okay so its rarer? and your point is...?  your tying to say that most people who get preganant, are not preganted bc of rape. okay fair enough...than im going to say most people who get pregnant do NOT get an abortion. So it shouldnt be an issue than, Because if you want to compare number of births to abortions. well births outnumber abortions by a landslide. So I guess you could say in comparison, that abortions are rare aswell. And everyone just keeps arguing its not right to kill a human being, and yes i agree. Thats why in our society a fetus is NOT considered a human being until it is born.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

And everyone just keeps arguing its not right to kill a human being, and yes i agree. Thats why in our society a fetus is NOT considered a human being until it is born.1. Try not to comment on stuff thats been posted over 100 days ago.2. I am against killing humans, not just human beings. Something being a human being or person is an intellectual issue, and as history has showed us, this concept of person hood has almost always left one group out and had them get screwed over. It being human or alive is a scientific issue, after conception it is alive and human, now I believe all living humans are entitle to human rights, if you don't agree, well... thats your problem.your tying to say that most people who get preganant, are not preganted bc of rape. okay fair enough...than im going to say most people who get pregnant do NOT get an abortion.Most people who get an abortion are not raped, that's just a fact. Most people who get pregnant don't get an abortion, however, I would argue that 22% is still rather high. So it shouldnt be an issue than, Because if you want to compare number of births to abortions. well births outnumber abortions by a landslide. So I guess you could say in comparison, that abortions are rare aswell.This issue isn't how common they are, again, 1 out of every 5 pregnancies resulting in an abortion is still pretty common. What I'm saying is, rape is not a cause to kill (abort) a human baby, period.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Try not to comment on stuff thats been posted over 100 days ago.1.thats okay thanks. I comment on whatever I want to. Most people who get an abortion are not raped, that's just a fact. Most people who get pregnant don't get an abortion, however, I would argue that 22% is still rather high. 1. Of course most people who get abortions are not raped. Anyone could tell you that. and you could say 22% is high, maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I'm all about personal choice. what about all these people having babies for the wrong reasons? What I'm saying is, rape is not a cause to kill (abort) a human baby, period.1. its not? how would you like to be violently raped and forced to have that mans baby? lol are you kidding me? thats ridiculous. 2. until you can actually get pregnant, your opinion means very little to me. and regardless of whether you think its right or not, abortions will never be illegal. It will never get to that point. Lastly, I will just say if abortions did become illegal, there will be much bigger problems. There would be Dr's doing it under the table, and women even doing it to themselves bc they feel its what they need to do. this would cause higher levels in crime and diseases. People always find ways around things.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Of course most people who get abortions are not raped. Anyone could tell you that. and you could say 22% is high, maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I'm all about personal choice. what about all these people having babies for the wrong reasons?If you don't want it, you can give it away or put it up for adoption. Its not a personal choice when your dealing with someone else's life. its not? how would you like to be violently raped and forced to have that mans baby? lol are you kidding me? thats ridiculous.1. Rape = Tragic and gives you the right to defend your self from the rapist.Rape ≠ Justification to kill a baby.2. Whats ridiculous is that you seem to think that one human's emotions trump another human's life. until you can actually get pregnant, your opinion means very little to me. and regardless of whether you think its right or not, abortions will never be illegal. It will never get to that point.Not really any point made here, but ok.Lastly, I will just say if abortions did become illegal, there will be much bigger problems. There would be Dr's doing it under the table, and women even doing it to themselves bc they feel its what they need to do. First off, if it were to go underground it would be MUCH harder to find a doctor let alone do it. Secondly, if they are still getting abortions then that's their problem, if they damage themselves while killing an innocent human than they shouldn't get a whole lot of sympathy for that.this would cause higher levels in crime and diseases. People always find ways around things.Yes they do, however, you seem to be taking the ideas of drug prohibition and applying it to a medical procedure that isn't exactly easy to preform. Abortion is not a drug, and logically, if people knew that they would have to use a back ally doctor who is likely untrust worthy they would probably be a bit more careful while having sex.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

To refute, your arbitrary claims:1. So did slaveholders when slavery was legal. They had a right to do what they wanted with their slaves.2. If you don't want to take care of the child or don't love it, put it up for adoption.3. Neither are you when you are sleeping or are in a coma.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

I think it should remain as a choice for the mother. What if the child is the result of a rape? What if the mother's life is in danger? What if the child is to be born with a life-threatening illness? I think the quality of life should be taken in to consideration and not necessarily the quantity. If the child was going to live perhaps twenty/thirty years with a debilitating disease is it fair to allow him or her to suffer with no prospect of ever being fully healthy?
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy..why should one kill a living object in you?? I see it as if you are sexually active and know the consequences that they should take on any Consequences that comes your way and thats including a BABY ..
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

the answer is quite simple. absolutely not. It blows my mind that this is still an issue thats brought up all the time. As human beings I cannot comprehend how we feel we have the right to tell another human being what to do/not to do with there own body. As a women how dare someone tell me what i can and cant do with my body, quite frankly thats none of there business. My body, My decision, its that simple!. To the people who agree wth this idea. How would a rape victim feel if they happend to get pregnant and forced to give birth to there attackers baby? And yess ofcourse theres always adoption, and I cant even tell you how many kids are raised in foster care because they have no parents. Lastly at the end of the day people are going to have sex (no strings attached) wether you like it or not. If we force women to have babies they dont want, how are those babies going to end up when there older?! Think about it.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Why would you ban it? Is it not the women's choice? What if it's rape? Or if it's incest? There's a large chances that they'll end up not proper once born.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

i think abortion should not be banned if a women does not want her child you cant force a women to not abort hr child as a result of that this matter could turn into child abuse of not taking care of her child who she didn't want in the first place. instead of children suffering child abuse they should peacefully go back to heaven!!!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Hell no! Women have the right to choose! :'(
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

So what about the rights of the unborn babies? Do they get rights to choose to live?
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Look at the link below like I said I feel both ways this is a website to show how many mother's give their children up for specific reason being.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

There are several cases that support this, the first of which is in the case of Rape or Incest.Oh? You say the baby didn't choose that? Okay, that's fair. But neither did the woman, no girl gets up and says "Hey, I wanna get screwed either by a family member or against my will!" Why are we punishing them? Furthermore, that child would always be a symbol of a mistake. The woman, and possibly the man responsible, would have to look after something that is in and of itself a manifestation of hostility, taboo and hatred.Another case is parents who aren't ready, including but not necessarily teenagers: The first reason I will cite is that there are cases (and yes, the Doctor can tell) in which delivering the baby would prove fatal to the mother. If its homicide to kill an unborn fetus, then the baby deserves to go on trial if it kills its mother. The normal case is people too young to have children; they can't take on that responsibility. Its more merciful to kill the thing than torture it with starvation and neglect. Finally there are people who shouldn't have children. Its called Munchhausen, and its very real. To say abortion to be banned is, in some small way, to support child abuse. I will end by disproving the argument that this is murder; the fetus is hardly self-aware. It can't feel pain, and sinks back into nonexistence or goes to baby heaven depending on your belief. Do you consider it murder to step on an insect? How about putting down an old dog who can no longer enjoy life? There are a few choice differences, but these creatures are about as self-aware as that fetus. If the things could talk for themselves, they would honestly be ambivalent towards death.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Hey yo fear mongers, thanks for trying to use all your biased and invalid sources. As a retaliation, since its apparently fair to cite whatever you want, I cite Ray Bradbury's The Assassin. Its a good short story, don't know if its online. If so, then great. The story is about a baby who is responsible for the death of both his parents, and considering the credibility of some of your sources, this one works well too.