azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

I called the argument pathetic, not the person. And, sure, I insinuated they were stupid but I don't cater to thin skin if I don't have to. I also explained why the argument was rubbish, so it was neither my sole recourse nor ad hominem. I also haven't silenced you or anyone else so you can set aside your persecution complex (oh, the irony of having to tell you that).And by all means, if you have an argument against my gun control position then make it. Though, of course, that won't actually prove that you all use facts since it's a singular instance of a singular person doing something. But, since you're so well versed in the use of facts and reason I'm sure I didn't really need to point that out.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

That half the country does not persecute you, the side that you think are the ones not persecuting and supporting you are actually just favoring you so as to get your vote on their side. That is why if you recognize any "persecuted" person with any physical characteristic, even when it is not in a bad context, you are stereotyped as hateful and bad and therefore are hated by half the country. Essentially, if you do not worship these so-called persecuted groups, then you are a "persecutor" and and are persecuted yourself because of it. You are not proud to be an American because this country does not support your immoral hypocritical values and you cannot stand it.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

As I already clarified at length to FromWithin and brontorapter...(1) I never said half the country is persecuting me, but that half the country supports my persecution; there's a difference between engaging and condoning.(2) I'm not using 'persecution' in the snowflake sense of the word; I mean it literally. I'm not against free speech; I'm hard-line anti-censorship and generally don't care what others have to say about me (or much else, really). I'm against legal policies that unconstitutionally single out persons. (3) I don't go in for partisan politics, so I'm just as critical of the populist left. Case in point, gun regulation. I think its unconstitutional to restrict the right to bear arms on the basis of prior mental health history. Not only does mental illness not actually dispose to higher incidence of violence, but this sort of policy strips a liberty from people on the mere suspicion of ill-intent which is inconsistent with due process.In short, you pegged me wrong. I'm not a liberal. I detest the populist left PC culture. The reason I'm not proud to be an American is because I'm disillusioned with humanity and don't feel compelled towards nationalism as a consequence. Why would I be proud of the products of mediocrity, particularly when they limit my autonomy?
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

I'm not American, and thank God for that :)
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

Thank God!............................................................................................
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Yup :)
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

I am not proud to be an American. If I am American, I don't want to reveal it as I like to remain anonymous.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

I recently moved to Canada when Trump was elected. I'll have fun laughing with Justin Trudeau while you get blown to bits with your arms war with Russia! Have Fun!
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

I don't think Trudeau is laughing at the moment. I am sure he is still mourning his hero, Fidel Castro's death. Might want to give him another couple months to get over that.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Noooooo take me with you! I don't want to stay here with the annoying orange president!
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Nah. I may be an American, but I've never loved this country nor it's people. I may love life, but America is nothing special.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

America may have its downsides, but it is the best country in the world. You have the right to do whatever job if you work hard. You are free to speak against the government and the freedom to be whatever religion you want to be. Maybe some people are in this country that make it seem that America is not that great, but every country has its downsides.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Best country in the world? In what way? "You have the right to do whatever job if you work hard. You are free to speak against the government and the freedom to be whatever religion you want to be."There are a lot of countries like that out there.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

What makes me dislike america the most is it's people. Not everyone, but america is a nation with a high percentage of people with lesser moral standards and education. What keeps it as a leading nation is merely the top 1% who hoards money, and the millions of people who practically, unknowingly, act like guinea pigs doing the work to keep the nation running.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: Yes!

That is directly related to the statistics that 1% of Americans are actually being responsible with their money. The other 99% are just running around buying everything they think is cool.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Not anymore. We have a country in which people are being shoved into poverty, suicide rates are soaring while there is a opiates epidemic. 90% of Americans are sucking wind financially. And our so called leaders? They couldn't care less.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Yes I am very proud. I am first-generation American. My parents and grandparents fled here from Armenia to escape the Armenian Genocide at the hands of the Turks. They became Naturalized citizens and believed without a doubt that America is the best country in the world. I honor them every time I vote and I ALWAYS vote. I am happy they are no longer here to witness the absurdity/evil of our current so-called prez and his likeminded thugs. I am very worried about our country and awaken each day wondering whether today will be the day DOOFUS DONNY triggers a nuclear war with his mouth.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

I'm a canadian :):):):):):):):):):):) I,m proud to be ccccccaaaaaaaaaaannnnaaaaaaddddddiiiiiiiiiaaaaaannnnnnnnnn
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Well I guess my answer would have to be no but I am proud that I'm not American :)
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

Why would I be proud of something that I was born into by random luck. Whether or not America is great, I didn't do anything to earn being an American, so I have nothing to be proud of.
Debate: Are you proud to be an American?
Side: No!

UGH! Even the statement "Proud to be an American" makes me sick. It's a motto that comes at the expense of other's lives and dignity. We have a habit of looking down on others and even calling ourselves the "superior nation" What nerve we have! Stupid platitudes like "Support our troops!" "Our troops fight so we can be free!" Who the hell is trying to come over and steal our freedom? Why is it a matter of supporting our troops, when it's the people above them telling them what to do, for their own interests, not the interests of troops. Sure there's reasons to be proud of being a citizen of this country, but not for the reasons that are mainstream and popular in our arrogant, and blind culture. We need humility, and I think it's coming.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

You can disprove many ideas of a God. But you can't Disprove that a God or creator created the universe.You can bring up all the scientific facts but there isn't anything disproving that God created this science.No one knows the real answer so yes 50/50.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Schroedinger's Cat. That's the only argument I need.......
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

So true . x)
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

A wise man once said: "On the day that science found God, he wont be a religion. But just another equation to be laid on the table"There is no chance that Science will be able to prove God but neighter will they be able to disprove him either. All it can do is explain how he did it
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

I disagree. Its all about likelyhood. Is it more likely that everything we know about the natural world and the laws of physics will get thrown out the window in favor of bronze age myths and an unfalsifiable space wizard? Or that the beginning of the universe is just as natural as everything else weve come to discover so that it aligns with everything else perfectly? I vote the later. Occams Razor
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I am an Atheist, but one can easily say that God has set this all up and we are simply exploring the many universes he may have created. Universes where laws are different amd we cannot imagine them since we have no measurememt to equate it with. People can create any theory they wish. If one say the Higgs Field gives mass to all things one can say God made that field to keep everything in tact. God can make a singularity and have it travel on its own and can edit what he wishes while following or breaking the laws of that universe. Probability is irrelevant. It is still 50/50. You say all this is natural, what is the starting point? A singularity? Could Gid have made that? Possibly. Then we bring in the Cyclic Model and say why can't God make a universe that goes through these cycles? Is that impossible for a being capable of practically all things? Of course not. Therefore the ratio will always be 1:1. 50:50. No matter what theory one proposes a person can play the role of God could have done this and as a typical non-believer would say "Thats bullshit". They can't really say thay since nobody can prove or disprove it.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Sure you can always resort back to "god did that" but ultimately that's still far more unlikely than a natural explaination so no it is not 50/50. It's more like 99/1. Just because you can stick god in a slot doesn't mean it makes it just as good an answer as a natural one. It absolutely does not.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

See? You pulled the typical Atheist argument out. Thats bullshit right? It's actually not. Someone can say science just finds information on God's creation. It will always be 50:50 if the possibilities are available. If those slots can be filled with God made a singularity what can you say? That is improbable? How so? Have you tested to prove that everything comes naturally? Can you show me a singularity? Show me a singularity now. Show me how everything always was. A natural explaination only explains God's creation and cannot logically turn the table and thus leaves the ratio at 50:50. 99:1 is dispicable, ignorant, bullshit. Just break all the fundamentals of logical reasoning? Logically if you can find a Higgs Boson that is great. You are simply finding more about God's creation. You can create a wormhole. You are finding new things in God's creation. Don't give me that Atheist bullshit. I have my reasons and I realized that many Atheists do not.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

See? You pulled the typical Atheist argument out. Thats bullshit right?By atheist bullshit you mean not accepting an unproven, unsupported and generally absurd claim as a equal possibility to real science? OkSomeone can say science just finds information on God's creationUntil they've proven this god exists and that he created everything that claim can't be used. It's empty and bullshit and should be dismissed.If those slots can be filled with God made a singularity what can you say? That is improbable? How so? Have you tested to prove that everything comes naturally?A god hasn't been proven to exist at all so that claim shouldn't even be taken seriously. And no we haven't tested everything in the universe that is impossible but we HAVE tested a fuckton and that is including every single physical law that governs our universe. So we know a ton and yet have ZERO indication of anything supernatural existing or needing to exist. It's all natural. So when we make theories and hypothesis on what happened at the birth of the universe using Occam's razor we should consider the explainations requiring the least assumptions and speculations and strays from reality. So it's either a natural explaination that is supported by evidence and the fact that everything we know is natural and there's no indication of supernatural anywhere, or we completely forgo all the laws of physics and everything we know to make a giant assumption about what is completely outside of space and time dipped into our reality and caused something natural to occur. One makes giant unsupported assumptions based on myth. One is based in reality and evidence. It is not 50/50. We don't know for 100% certain yet but for fucks sake it isn't an even toss up not even close.The rest is senseless babbling about a bullshit argument from ignorance. You can't claim that anything is part of a gods creation until that god is proven to exist. Well tough shit because it is t anywhere close to proven and has NOTHING to support it at all. You can't say, "oh I don't know and you don't know so ahaha were both stupid" no. Sorry.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

God hasnt been proven to be real, therfore any hypothesis of any kind making assumptions including him are null until he is demonstrated. This leaves only the natural explainations.End of discussion. I wont cater to bullshit about unproven deities and giant assumptions that mock our reality and that mock good science.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

You are still being a typical Atheist. God has not be proven or disproven. Therefore possibility remains in tact. therfore any hypothesis of any kind making assumptions including him are null until he is demonstratedThey remain a possibility. They are not null. Do you even understand this? This leaves only the natural explainationsOkay, you clearly can't understand the notion I am giving.. I wont cater to bullshit about unproven deities and giant assumptions that mock our reality and that mock good science.There you go, again, the typical Atheist. A deity does not mock anything. Science finds explainations. Science cannot explain all things. Science can go far. Science cannot touch infinity. A deity can make a singularity and let it go. Therefore anything Science explains is what is naturally occuring within their realm. The deity still mocks nothing. If this is your last resort I am disappointed. I am an Atheist. I understand a mass majority of Atheist arguments. My college professor showed me how ignorant I was. I used your argument. Many times it has worked. Until my professor explained it to me. We must decode the master image behind our realm. Can we do that? Who knows?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

You are still being a typical Atheist. God has not be proven or disproven. Therefore possibility remains in tact.I never said there wasnt a possibility. Of course a god could exist. But compared to real scientific theory, its a VERY low possibility.They remain a possibility. They are not null. Do you even understand this?Yes they are possible but they are based on an unproved and unsupported premise making them pathetically insignificant compared to current scientific theory.Okay, you clearly can't understand the notion I am giving.No i dont think YOU understand. When you take a natural explaination and tack god onto it it is no longer natural. it becomes supernatural.My college professor showed me how ignorant I was. I used your argument. Many times it has worked. Until my professor explained it to me. We must decode the master image behind our realm. Can we do that? Who knows?I dont give a shit what your professor said. We have no reason to even think there IS any grand master behind anything. Just because one COULD be there doesnt make it true or even likely. Until you demonstrate that there is good reason to believe there is something behind the universes creation then i dont have to cater to this bullshit.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

But compared to real scientific theory, its a VERY low possibility.You still dont understand. If a deity made a singularity what science will prove he exists? Nothing. You are with the singularity. Science explains our surroundings. It does not go past that. You are acting as if it does. Yes they are possible but they are based on an unproved and unsupported premise making them pathetically insignificant compared to current scientific theoryUnproven? You mean it hasn't been proven or disproven. Just making that clear. Again, a scientific theory only explains what we can understand about our surroundings. You act as if science goes beyond that.No i dont think YOU understand. When you take a natural explaination and tack god onto it it is no longer natural. it becomes supernatural.This proves that you missed my notion. I won't even repeat myself.I dont give a shit what your professor saidFunny. I would imagine that he understand more than you do. I would imagine that he has studied this longer than you have. Science is just explanation for occurences. Something cannot be explained because humans are limited. Science cannot even touch the surface of infinity. We have no reason to even think there IS any grand master behind anything.YOU don't have a reason. Someone might. If it is a bad reason so what? It is still a reason. So if there is nothing to prove or disprove it stop giving them shit and shut the fuck up and mind your damn business. Otherwise give me a good theory that shows me how we have reduced the possibility of a God.. Just because one COULD be there doesnt make it true or even likely*5It doesn't make it impossible or improbable either. Don't leave out those words.Until you demonstrate that there is good reason to believe there is something behind the universes creation then i dont have to cater to this bullshit.Sir, I am done. You simply don't understand what I am telling you. You are just the typical Atheist who thinks science can go to infinity and beyond. Science cannot do that. Humans cannot do that. Maybe you will realize that one day.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

but ultimately that's still far more unlikely than a natural explaination so no it is not 50/50.Would you mind explaining how?Just because you can stick god in a slot doesn't mean it makes it just as good an answer as a natural oneAnd I suppose that you are saying that as long as you can explain the process, God isnt there?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Would you mind explaining how?Is the existence of unicorns 50/50? Is the existence of leprechauns 50/50? Is the existence of mermaids 50/50?And I suppose that you are saying that as long as you can explain the process, God isnt there?YES! You are adding an extra layer of difficulty.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Is the existence of unicorns 50/50? Is the existence of leprechauns 50/50? Is the existence of mermaids 50/50?I ask you for an explanation of how it is unlikely. And forgive me but I fail to see the point of your questionYES! You are adding an extra layer of difficulty.Prove it then.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

I ask you for an explanation of how it is unlikely. And forgive me but I fail to see the point of your questionThe only way you can think that God is 50/50 is to also believe those are 50/50. Well, do you believe that?Prove it then.Good job dummy. You asked him if his belief was that providing an explanation means no God, not if that belief is true. Well, his response has shown me to be correct. BOOM, proven.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

The only way you can think that God is 50/50 is to also believe those are 50/50. Well, do you believe that?Under this logic, I ask, what exactly is the formula to decrease/increase the chances of them existing?You asked him if his belief was that providing an explanation means no God, not if that belief is true. Well, his response has shown me to be correct. BOOM, proven.I ask, did you read my response to him?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Under this logic, I ask, what exactly is the formula to decrease/increase the chances of them existing?Ok, so you do believe in unicorns, mermaids, leprechauns, etc. Why don't you just say that? If you believe all those other things, I can see why you also believe in God.I ask, did you read my response to him?I ask did you read my response to you? I proved I was right, what more do you want? You asked me to prove my statement, and it was proven. Do you want me to double prove it? I guess this is the reason why God can't be proven to not exist because even if we did prove it, you would question it.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Ok, so you do believe in unicorns, mermaids, leprechauns, etc. Why don't you just say that? If you believe all those other things, I can see why you also believe in God.Do not take it as an insult, but perhaps you have misunderstand. It is merely a play of logic wherein I can prove that everything that cannot be disproven has a chance of being true.This is the same logic that created Russels Tea Pot and the Flying Spagetti Monster and practically every single conspiracy theory on Earth.Ridiculous, but very entertainingI ask did you read my response to you? I proved I was right, what more do you want?sighI asked you to prove that God will stop existing if you can explain the process. But you replied by saying that evesatanas statement proves yours.I hope you know that ongoing debates is not a good source of facts
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Do not take it as an insult, but perhaps you have misunderstand. It is merely a play of logic wherein I can prove that everything that cannot be disproven has a chance of being true.This is the same logic that created Russels Tea Pot and the Flying Spagetti Monster and practically every single conspiracy theory on Earth.Ridiculous, but very entertainingYou are the one who believes it not me. Why do you believe in unicorns?I asked you to prove that God will stop existing if you can explain the process. But you replied by saying that evesatanas statement proves yours.No dumbass, that is not what you asked me. You ask avesatanas if he believes that to be true. I responded that YES he believes that. You then asked me to prove that statement. But you were asking me to prove that I was right when I said he believed that statement. When he came back to confirm that he did believe that statement, it proved that I was right.