azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

I disagree, prove me wrong. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

you've already done that for me.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

every single post of yours on this debate proves it.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You have no proof. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

The burden of proof lies with you here. He has provided evidence, your 'arguments' on this debate which clearly show poor debating skills. If you wish to disprove this, you must provide evidence of you debating properly. Because based on the evidence provided, you have never once debated properly.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

I am not the one making the positive claim, he is. The burden of proof is on him.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

…As I said, and please read it this time. "the burden of proof lies with you here. He has provided evidence, your 'arguments' on this debate which clearly show poor debating skills. If you wish to disprove this, you must provide evidence of you debating properly. Because based on the evidence provided, you have never once debated properly."I know you say you read through things, but I responded to the argument you just made in my previous comment. That shows that you aren't reading, or at the very least you are not trying to respond to arguments. This is further proof that you are a poor debater.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You said that I have never debated properly, and that is false.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Ok, prove that. So far, all the evidence presented has shown that you have never debated properly. If you wish to provide evidence that that statement is false, you must provide evidence of yourself debating properly. If you were to debate properly, that is what you would do. If you do not do this, you are simply proving our point.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Prove me wrong. You have no proof that I am a poor debater. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

here you go all the proof you could ever want http://www.createdebate.com/user/viewprofile/LibProlifer  let me know if you require more proof.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

still don't know the difference between opinion and fact?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

It's a fact not an opinion learn the difference.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Well looks like I knocked it back to its default settings.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

It is less about you being a poor debtor, and more about you simply not debating. For example, on this very debate you just declared that you would never change your mind, then simply repeated your opinion. That isn't debating.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

read what he wrote.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

yes i do literally every post of yours on this debate is proof.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Employers do not have the right to their employee's online accounts.Yes they do just like everyone else does.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

No they don't. What I do at home is none of my employer's business.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

what part of everything you do online is public information do you not understand?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

Employers do not own their employees. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

and how is viewing public information about potential employees owning them?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

My employer does not have the right to my personal information. You will not change my mind.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

oh and every single employer requires you to give personal information in order to get hired.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

then don't put personal information where everyone can view it then.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

What I do on my own time is none of my employer's business. You will never change my mind on this.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

What I do on my own time is none of my employer's business.If the public can view what you do on your own time it's open game for anyone.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

You will not change my mind. .
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Ok, if nothing will change your mind, explain why. Why is the argument they just made illegitimate? If nothing will change your mind, you have to have a reason why each argument presented at you is illegitimate. That is how a debate works. It is fine to restate a claim, but you MUST back it up with new information, or at least respond to what was just said to you. Otherwise you are not debating.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Do you have a right to privacy at the supermarket?When you do things publicly, you waive your own right to privacy.If you want to keep something private - don't tell the whole world about it. Still not making sense?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

I agree, but stuff made available to the public is public knowledge. I feel as if the employer has the right to do background checks on their employees. What is your exact problem with employee searches? Is there a limit you have on that?
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: Yes, it is wrong.

What if they were hiding secrets from someone it should get the person who did it fired
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

I believe if the person had made anything public, and by that I mean it's blatantly searchable to the public, then finding someones interests in fine. I would say it's almost similar to a library search for the book you want. If it's made public it's available for all to see.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Whatever we put out on Twitter, Facebook, etc etc are global and in the public domain so anyone from anywhere can access the info.A good reason why we should be conscious about what we put there about ourselves and what we "talk" about, our opinions, ideas, etc etc. Its all there for anyone else to read.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

Employers have done background checks for years. It would be silly for them to specifically exclude publicly available information from the person directly. It may reveal potential discrepancies from what they provide in their resume (e.g. they say they went to Stanford, but their facebook profile shows they went to a community college, etc.), can give a general perspective of personality of the candidate, etc.For jobs with a public profile, you would find things before the public does, etc.I don't think employers should 'stalk' potential employees, and I think they can go too far when they request usernames/passwords, etc. but reviewing the public info is acceptable and people should post accordingly.
Debate: Is it wrong for employers to 'stalk' potential employee's internet personas?
Side: No, it is not wrong.

As said already, what's made public by others is public to all. However I think the searches conducted by most employers involves hacking the employee's networking account, which in relation to freedom and privacy. But I think the reason the employer wants to go through this information takes precedence as it is essential that you know that you get what you are looking at, particularly since recruiting and employing is costly and time consuming. I'm sure most people would be outraged if you bought a TV that didn't work and had no a no returns policy.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Yes, because of what He taught to everyone and the world would be a better place if more people followed His teachings.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

These teachings?:  The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. "But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given." (Luke 12:47-48)"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." (Matthew 10:34)
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Context is the key to Jesus' words. In Matthew 10:34, Jesus is speaking about the divisions that will come, even among family members, over their belief or lack of belief about Him. In that respect, He has come to bring division. This context is also related in Luke 12:51.This is my source.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

It seems Srom's tactic is to ignore any argument that pins him down.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

I wasn't ignoring his post. I just simply wasn't online to dispute his argument. If I am not online that doesn't mean I am ignoring his post.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

I don't understand believing a teaching that there is an invisible, undetectable being in the sky who created everything and controls everything would make you a better person.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

He wasn't invisible when He was on this earth. He made it clear that He was alive when He was on this earth through multiple sources. He does makes you a better person because you don't do what you used to do anymore and you are changed person through Christ.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

He wasn't on the Earth people just made up that Jesus was the son of God.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

The Old Testament predicts the coming of the Christ. If people made up Jesus being the Son of God, then why do so many of His prophecies match up with the Old Testament, yet it not be so obvious that everyone believe it, displaying that Jesus was not intentionally made up to deceive?
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

Because bits of his life were made up and altered later on to match the prophecies in the old testament.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

So why do all of the stories coincide with one another in the Bible?
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

Because they were made up.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

But they were written by different authors in a time that did not believe that the Messiah would die, let alone be resurrected. No one believed Jesus, not even His own apostles at the time of His death; Paul and James had radical conversions. The power of Christ moved within these peoples and showed them the truth!
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Yes, He was on this earth. That explains why we know of Him because if Christ never came we wouldn't know of Him. You've go to thank those men in the Bible who were authors of some of those books because if it weren't for them we wouldn't have information about God or any of the stories in the Bible.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

So how do you reinforce justice and morals if let's say the Government goes bankrupt and there is no budget to spend on police? Crime rates would be sky high.But when a person knows that God is watching, he might not be all good, but there will be some sort of phobia created to ban him from doing criminal acts.This is a reply to this specific argument that knowing that God is watching will let people be better people.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Absolutely YES, especially when you consider the ear-ey alternative.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

By what records we have, should he have existed, he was a great public speaker and influenced many people.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

So was Hitler. Being a great public speaker doesn't have anything to do with whether or not you're a good role model. Stephen Hawking - not such a great public speaker because it's hard to listen to Teletype for 3 hours. However, if any of my children would pick him as a role model (astrophysicist), then I'd say that's a pretty darn good choice compared to a self righteous liberal hippy.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Anybody successful can be taken as a good role model. Hitler was not successful as his prejudices and rushed strategies brought him down pretty quickly. If someone is corrupt, they cannot be successful as they have already lost their principles. Anything wrong with self-righteous liberal hippies?
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Did Jesus try to make the world a better place for everyone? YesIs he a good example of how one person can change the world? Yes.Should we follow his example of doing everything in our power to make the world better for everyone? Well obviously. Does that mean that we have to preach that there's an evil force in all of mankind because a rib-woman that didn't know right from wrong discovered right from wrong by eating an illegal fruit that God created for no reason? No that's insane.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Yes, because I look up to all hippies.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Christians like to claim ownership of Christ. But the veneration of Jesus by Muslims began during the lifetime of the Prophet of Islam. Perhaps most telling is the story in the classical biographies of Muhammad, who, entering the city of Mecca in triumph in 630AD, proceeded at once to the Kaaba to cleanse the holy shrine of its idols. As he walked around, ordering the destruction of the pictures and statues of the 360 or so pagan deities, he came across a fresco on the wall depicting the Virgin and Child. He is said to have covered it reverently with his cloak and decreed that all other paintings be washed away except that one.Jesus, or Isa is referred to by name in as many as 25 different verses of the Quran and six times with the title of "Messiah" (or "Christ", depending on which Quranic translation is being used). He is also referred to as the "Messenger" and the "Prophet" but, perhaps above all else, as the "Word" and the "Spirit" of God. No other prophet in the Quran, not even Muhammad, is given this particular honour. In fact, among the 124,000 prophets said to be recognised by Islam - a figure that includes all of the Jewish prophets of the Old Testament - Jesus is considered second only to Muhammad, and is believed to be the precursor to the Prophet of Islam.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

Jesus, or Isa, as he is known in Arabic, is deemed by Islam to be a Muslim prophet rather than the Son of God, or God incarnate. He is referred to by name in as many as 25 different verses of the Quran and six times with the title of "Messiah" (or "Christ", depending on which Quranic translation is being used).The Old Testament said that the Messiah would be the Son of God. Jesus is the Messiah in Islam. Therefore, in Islam, Jesus is the Son of God.Jesus is considered second only to Muhammad, and is believed to be the precursor to the Prophet of Islam.The Old Testament leads up to the coming of the Messiah. Why would the Messiah come and not be the greatest of all the prophets?
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

I believe in the real Injeel (Arabic for Bible) that is now in the possession of Jesus peace be upon him. And I believe that the testament and the Bible has been falsified by the jews during the time of Jesus. The reason was to regain control of their religious authority.And the Quran clearly states: It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! when He determines a matter, He only says to it, "Be", and it is. Verily Allah is my Lord and your Lord: therefore serve Him; this is the Straight Way. [The Holy Qur'an, Surah 19:35-36]
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Both religeons (Christianity and Islam) look at jesus as a holy role model. Don't forget to correct the side you are supporting in the previous argument. ( it states that NO).
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Yes (assuming that he did exist) .
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

That would depend on what you define a good role model as.If you mean in a christian stance then he is a perfect role model because the whole idea is to be "christ-like"If you mean in a moral sense then its relative, unless you decide there is a good to give objective morality to the situation. And that would also be unhelpful because that would not tell us what morals are objective, unless you believe that christ was God which is circular and needs you to believe the premise (that Jesus was a good role model).Thus the only defensible position to take is that he is structurally neccesary to christianity as a role model, and is good in that sense.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Yes, if you look at the stories of Jesus, he was a good role model. He helped and loved everyone. He never turned a person away-not even prostitutes or criminals. He believed in feeding everyone. From a WWJD website: 1)He embraced the outcasts--Jesus demonstrated the love of God by accepting the castaways of society. This provoked great disdain from the religious establishment. But Jesus was much less squeamish than most about embracing the sinful and sickly, the unseemly and unimportant. 2)He restored broken lives--Jesus provided for people's physical and financial needs (Matt. 14:14-21-21, 17:27). He cast out demons (Luke 4:36), healed broken bodies (Luke 5:17), raised the dead (John 11:1-44), and forgave the sins of the guilty (Matt. 9:6).
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Jesus Christ is the best role model because he imitated his Father so perfectly. Jesus was never greedy. Isn't that what we tell our children to never be?Jesus spoke the truth. Isn't that what we tell our children to do?Jesus respected and loved his earthly parents. Isn't that what we want from our children?Jesus loved and was kind to everyone. Isn't that the kind of people we want our children to be?Jesus never caused pain or suffering. Isn't that what we want our children to do?Jesus always gave. isn't that what we want our children to do?Jesus was described as poor, and uneducated.Yet he understood the Scriptures better than the High Priests and gained large numbers of followers whom he fed and took care of.He wasn't crucified for nothing. The authority of those days felt threatened of Jesus becuase he exposes the hyprocrisy and evil within them.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

He's taught us to be compassionate, stand up for what is just no matter what and to really look deep beyond the surface on things.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

Yes, what he taught to everyone that the world could become a great place if everyone followed his teaching.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

When He told to turn the other cheek when someone strikes at you, He is the perfect role model for peace.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

Sure... if ya wanna end up nailed to a cross one day.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

I consider the willingness to die for the greater good to be a good quality.Granted, dying needlessly is stupid, so it should be avoided. Jesus himself demonstrates his hesitation to die in Luke 22:42, also implying that there was no other way for him to achieve God's greater purpose (which would achieve the greater good).
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

"Love me more than anything else or I will burn you!"Such a great role model.......
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

To all you butthurt christians who downvoted me without argument, I will quote the bible"Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me." Matthew 10:37Basically hes saying if you dont love him more than your mom and dad he will send you to hell, were every second of the rest of your existence will be never ending agony and suffering.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: Yes

"Hell" is a term used to describe the figurative common grave for all mankind. The idea of God to (God is the father Jesus is the son) torment disobedient humans is a false truth that has been taught by most Christians who have very little biblical understanding. Also they were under the influence of Satan.This Scripture you are referring to if you study the rest of the Bible more. Jesus is saying that if you put anyone else before God or give worship that rightfully belongs to God you are not worthy of a place in paradise. Yes we all love our sons, daughters, mothers, fathers a lot, but you should never place them above God. If you do however, decide to follow God you will see that nothing that God requires you to do is painful.So it is a win win situation for us. Not so much for God because as you can see you have fallen for a lie. God is actually loving and caring more so than anyone can imagine.
Debate: Is Jesus Christ a good role model?
Side: No

"If you do however, decide to follow God you will see that nothing that God requires you to do is painful."Martyrs spanning millenia would like a word with you.