azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

I’m waitingWaiting for what?That’s why I asked as I’ve yet to see oneHow about you look in the previous arguments I've made, then you'll see them.I’m afraid you did , bet you will do it againI did? When? Where?Incorrect , abortion is termination of an embryo or fetus from the uterus before it is sufficiently developed to survive independentlyHow am I incorrect? You practically said the same thing as I did, except I didn't say that last part. If you look up the definition for termination, it says "the action of bringing something or coming to an end." So in this case, you're brining the life of the fetus to an end.No it’s not , why are women not charged with murder then betvyou cannot answer , also I told you your whole argument is the pathetic “ because I said so “ argumentYes it is. You're killing a fetus. The fetus isn't something lifeless, as it is clearly living. The reason women aren't charged for murder is because of the law. I never said because I said so, not once.I agree as it’s exactly as predictedOh so you agree with my statements then?It hasn’t the law agrees with me , making me right ...againIt does, and the law doesn't agree with you, you agree with the law (for some reason) which tells me that you agree with murder.Why’s it in the woman then ?Because that's where babies come from.Are you serious !! Wow , what an insightYes, I'm serious.Still hasn’t got those rights buddy...... anything else?The law says it doesn't have rights, but really the fetus does have rights to life, since it's human. "Still hasn't," so does that mean that it will happen, since it still hasn't yet?
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

It’s not , why are you calling a fetus a “ baby “ ?The fetus has its own genetic code, brain, eyes, nerves, hand and foot brints, sometimes is a boy, it is a person with the right to live. It is rude to say someone's mother coulda shoulda woulda had the right to kill them. Even you have the right to live. Birth is just a change in location.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

It’s not , why are you calling a fetus a “ baby “ ?I’m not The fetus has its own genetic code, brain, eyes, nerves, hand and foot brints, sometimes is a boy, it is a person with the right to live.It’s there by permission a mother has a right to abort  It is rude to say someone's mother coulda shoulda woulda had the right to kill them. It’s rude to say a mother coulda shoulda not have an abortion Even you have the right to live.No I hadn’t , it was granted  Birth is just a change in location.So is death , your point is ?
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

. ....
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

You can't draw a line on where an embryo becomes human. Thus, abortion is definitive murder of a potential life and should therefore be prevented by a responsible government.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

I agree on your previous point on the other debate as in your phrasing “ potential life “ , I disagree here as in your statement claiming abortion is “ murder “ You agree when you say you can’t draw a line when an embryo becomes human yet the very definition of murder is of one human being by another Murder 1.the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another."the brutal murder of a German holidaymaker"
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

I want you to follow me a bit on this: if we were to find a single cell on mars or any other planet, we would consider it life. Why should it be that when their is developing baby or fetus as many like to say it, we consider less than life. It is as if because it is not born yet, it is not considered living yet. This could not be further from the truth. If we are going to consider a single cell organism life, then we must consider an organism that is consisting of millions of cells and containing intelligence life as well.Also, if a person robs and bank and gets caught, we send them to jail. If a person is caught speeding, we give them a ticket. If someone causes an accident, their insurance premiums go up. We as a whole make mistake daily. We have to face those mistakes and suffer the consequences. If you get pregnant my mistake, that is your child. Your consequence is raising it. We cannot always run away from our problems. We must learn to face them. Abortion is just a way to run away from our problems.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

I just think it absolutely asinine that abortion would be legal when in fact it is considered double homicide to murder a pregnant women. At 20 weeks a baby (fetus.. whatever you use to justify this) has tiny feet. at twelve weeks they have rib cages and tiny hands, so know that it isn't a tiny ball of mass. It is a developing human being and should be given its basic rights.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

I can go both sides on this because If a female is raped and she finds out he is pregnant then, I think there can be some leeway between abortion or not. Don't get me wrong it is murder and I don't like seeing innocent people die everyday but if you are raped and usually most women you are raped are not ready for a child, I do think they have the right to have an abortion. But if you have sex (not rape) and you get pregnant I do think then you should not be allowed to have an abortion. Due to the fact that you can prevent all the risk of getting pregnant from happening.- Condoms- Pull out methid- Not having sex at all- or even birth controlYes they all don't always work but only one does work every time and that is just not having sex at all.I'm not saying that an innocent child should die, yes they have the right to live. So I change my opinion I think they should instead send them to a foster home, or adoption center. Sorry.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

A rape, as tragic and evil as it may be, doesn't justify a death (except perhaps that of the rapist). Certainly the unborn child shouldn't be punished for the rapist's crime.You wouldn't say that a rape victim is allowed to go and kill an innocent adult simply as a result of their being raped.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

Why does someone get the right to kill someone just because they were raped? Yes, they may not be ready for a child but adoption exists. To me, it sounds like a bully situation; "The bully experienced pain once, so they made another experience pain." Only, with bullies, it's unacceptable. Why is it fine for raped women to do the same?
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

My bad on that part I did not think of adoption or even foster homes. That's my fault, but thanks for justifying that and I will make sure to correct myself.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

A woman has an inalienable Constitutional right to preserve to gestation period of a human embryo alive in her body. That is why she can be given liberty in the burden of her responsibilities set by nature. She spends her entire fertile life with the loss of life in the hopes of a suitable mate.What was not understood clearly is if United States Constitution separation can or cannot provide equal protection once a process of admission is started publicly
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

Constitutional right?I'm sorry, where's the amendment in the Bill of Rights giving women the ability to kill her own child?
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

where's the amendment in the Bill of Rights giving women the ability to kill her own child?Hello the:It's the 4th Amendment... I'm not gonna argue Constitutional law with you here, but the Supreme Court found that a woman's RIGHT to abort her unborn child is IN the 4th Amendment..exconPS> You're probably one of those who cant find the right for gay marriage in the Constitution either...
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

The 4th Amendment? The 4th Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures of a property or person.If you mean the Roe v. Wade case, you're incorrect there as well. The case used the 14th Amendment to claim that abortion laws/bans are unconstitutional, correct? Now, how could that be? The right to abortion isn't an inherent human right, like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.Where is the right to gay marriage found in the Constitution?
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

Where is the right to gay marriage found in the Constitution?Hello again, the:No. I meant the 4th Amendment. It's often argued as protecting our right to privacy, and that's what I did.. You don't agree.. Got it..They right for gays to marry is found in the 14th. You don't agree with that either. You don't understand what EQUAL protection under the law means.. Got it. But, I'm not here to argue Constitutional law with you.. I'm here to tell you what the law IS pursuant to the great Supreme Court of the United States of America.. If you wanna argue, go argue with them. excon
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

No. I meant the 4th Amendment. It's often argued as protecting our right to privacy.Okay. Banning abortion doesn't infringe on your personal privacy, just like how making the sale of illegal drugs illegal doesn't infringe on your personal freedom.They right for gays to marry is found in the 14th.The privilege, you mean. Marriage isn't a right. But, I do agree that the privilege for anyone to marry anyone is given to us by the 14th Amendment.You don't understand what EQUAL protection under the law meansI understand completely what equal protection under the law means. Equal protection isn't giving protection to one side like you seem to be arguing.the law is pursuant to the great Supreme Court of the United States of America..I would argue the law is pursuant to the Constitution.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

Just to point out some facts artificial insemination is an act of not having sexual intercourse at all. This process may itself create a need for Gender Specific Amputation or female specific Amputation.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

Kill the rapist, not the unborn person...................................................................................................
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: Yes.

"Pull out methid"Doesn't work, aside from the sperm in "pre-ejaculate" it's far easier said than done.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

I agree with this claim I see where you're going with this and I like the fact that you used proof for you're statement also.
Debate: Should abortion be legal?
Side: No.

Fetuses are human beings. Murder is ending the life of a human being. Murder is illegal. Abortion is murder. Abortion should be illegal. The end.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

I'm going to take for granted the notion that federal sanctioning of the taking of human life, be it in favor of whatever "greater good," should not be tolerated. If anyone would like to contest this, let me know and I'll elaborate.While even the most ferocious of pro-borts openly admit that human life is scientifically defined as beginning at conception, others still insist that it is not, and some of their arguments should be taken into consideration. But while we're pontificating on the nature of human life, it is extremely irresponsible to allow potentially millions of human beings to die in the name of another's convenience. Better to err on the side of life.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

I agree with you. We should not abort a fetus simply for the purpose that it will cause or bring convenience to us.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

I'm very against abortion, but I'm not stupid; I know there are times where it is a necessity. I think it should ultimately stay legal, but should be a lot more restricted. I don't see anything good from a 25-year-old going in and getting an abortion because she just doesn't want the baby.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

So are you are saying that because she wants an abortion she should have it? Then why are you even against abortion? We are talking about a life here not just a fetus. I believe that everyone has a right to live. No fetus should pay the consequences because of a decision made by it's mother. In the year 2000, there were 1.3 million fetus that were killed and the same amount of families were waiting for children to adopt.If you are saying that nothing is wrong if a woman needs an abortion, the you are saying she can have repeat abortions. What if a woman who has unprotected sex and knows the consequences of her actions but later decides she wants an abortion? What is your opinion on that?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

I think so too. Every father should have a right to have a say when it comes to an abortion because that fetus was formed from their chromosomes and genetics. I am surprised that advocates for abortion are saying that men have no right to tell a woman how to control her body but yet they don't have a problem with the decision of the U.S Supreme Court in which all of the judges were men.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

I'm very against abortion, but I'm not stupid; I know there are times where it is a necessity. I think it should ultimately stay legal, but should be a lot more restricted. I don't see anything good from a 25-year-old going in and getting an abortion because she just doesn't want the baby.Why should it matter to you if a person does that? That's awfully nosey and judgmental.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

Murder is never a necessity. It is wrong no matter what the situation!
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

No sometimes it is...there is a a type of pregnancy that kills the mother AND the fetus unless its aborted....I pretty much agree that abortion is wrong otherwise though!!
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

Osama bin Laden?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

There is a difference between murder and being legally killed because of issues relating to self defense or for the greater good of society.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

What is the opposite of 'LIFE?' Answer, 'DEATH.' Stop saying 'Pro-choice' the opposite of Pro-life is 'Pro-death' You're not Pro-choice you're Pro-death if you are for abortion
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

fairly stupid argument.what is the opposite of choice? dictatorship?If you do not want the mother and the doctor to go to jail, then you are pro-choice, even if you would prefer the mother chose having the baby.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

The life of a fetus should have as much value as any other human life.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

The life of a fetus should have as much value as any other human life.it is generally accepted that people can kill in self-defense with varying levels of imminent harm as justification - if you apply that same principle to the mother fetus relationship that would permit abortions with varying degrees of danger to life and health of the mother.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

If abortion was made illegal but women still got them, would that not make them criminals? I would believe so, therefore they should have the same consequences as criminals. Right?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

Any Federal law on abortion is inherently illegal because the Federal government has no authority to regulate abortion. The States individually have the power to. I would be ecstatic if every State in the Union outlawed abortion, just like murder is outlawed.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

Any Federal law on abortion is inherently illegal because the Federal government has no authority to regulate abortion. The States individually have the power to. I would be ecstatic if every State in the Union outlawed abortion, just like murder is outlawed.Abortion isn't murder. A foetus is not a person in the meaningful sense of the word.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

Isn't animal cruelty a crime? Animals are technically not people. So shouldn't it apply to unborn humans when one ends their life?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

Isn't animal cruelty a crime? Animals are technically not people. So shouldn't it apply to unborn humans when one ends their life?Ending a life isn't cruel. Cruelty specifically refers to negligence and mistreatment like physical abuse.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

[What? Ending a life isn't cruel? So i guess we should let murders and rapes takes place too because those are not cruel acts]I believe Avasked said mistreatment counted as cruelty. Last I checked, mistreating someone includes murder and rape. Cruelty must involving hurting someone, physically or mentally. The fetus cannot think nor can feel.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

So are you saying that murder is not cruelty? According to the laws it is and also a person can commit rape in a cruel manner by hurting the victim mentally and physically through the ordeal.Like i asked aveske, a person who is paralyzed has lost their consciousness, so should we kill them because they cannot think or feel too?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

No one kills a fetus because it isn't a conscious being. A paralyzed person is not in a literal parasitic relationship with another human being. If they are on life support, they are being kept alive by machines. They are not infringing on anyone's rights to bodily autonomy.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

Do you have any evidence to suggest that the fetus is more of a parasitic entity? It is not a conscious being but so are the people who are paralyzed who depend on other people to take care of them even though they are on life support machines. According to you a fetus is not a conscious being so how can it infringe on a person's right to her own body?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

In the case of paralyzed or comatose patients, if a caretaker becomes unhappy with the situation, they are legally allowed to quit or otherwise cease their involvement. This is also not an issue of bodily autonomy.The only evidence I need for the parasitism of the fetus is the definition of the word parasite: an organism that lives inside another organism (its host) and siphons resources without reciprocation. The fetus uses the mother's body as its host. It depends solely on her for survival; no one else can step in and take her place if she is unhappy with the situation. If someone or something is using your body to survive, you should have a say in whether or not it is allowed to continue doing so. You should be permitted to decide what medical procedures you will undergo or forego. If you do not get to decide this, then your rights to bodily autonomy are being infringed upon. When the interests of the fetus and the mother collide, the mother should take precedence. This, more than a lack of consciousness in the fetus, is why I support abortion at the discretion of the mother and no one else.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

You mentioned the term parasite so my question to you is does parasites posess the DNA which identifies us each as a human? And if the fetus is indeed a parasite then how come it belongs to the race of homo sapiens referred to as humans? To the extent of my knowledge i was taught that parasites feed from their host in return causing injury to the host which is completely the opposite in terms of the fetus.A fetus is formed from a sperm cell and a egg cell which identifies it as a developing human with developing organs. If the fetus is indeed a parasite then you are implying that all humans are parasites at the fetal stage and any doctors or scientist will prove you wrong. The body of a woman is not infringed upon because the fetus is formed from a natural process of reproduction which involves the reproduction of human organisms developing into human beings. Parasites are formed from foreign materials that enter the body but the fetus is formed from the cells of the human body itself which makes it a special function of the sex organs of the human body.Also you said that people who are caretakers of other people can denounce their rights to take care of that person who is paralyzed but what happens if that person signs a irrevocable power of attorney to stand for the person giving power of attorney. In this case it is a permanent legal contract between the appearer and the person recieving power. And even if this person recuses himself or herself from taking care of the paralyzed person wouldn't that person also depend on the help of doctors to survive? And what about newborns that are one day old? Don't they also feed from the body of the mother? Does that makes them a parasite?
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro choice

I am just going to repeat what I said before in different terms because I am not sure how I can make it any more clear.A fetus makes its home inside the mother's body and leeches energy and nutrients from her, which is very taxing on her body. The fetus does not contribute anything in return. This is, without a doubt, the definition of a parasitic relationship. I don't know how you can interpret this relationship as the 'opposite' of what I stated as that would entail the mother leeching from the fetus without contributing anything in return.The bodily autonomy of the woman is infringed upon if she doesn't want the fetus to continue using her as a host and she is forbidden from seeking an abortion.Back to the patient: I admit that I am unfamiliar with legal complications like that. However, it still seems that everyone involved has a way of disentangling themselves from a situation of caring for a paralyzed person, if they wish to do so. The person with power of attorney can recuse, as you said, and doctors voluntarily take care of patients because it is their job. If they didn't like it, they could quit or transfer. No matter what kind of bizarre hypothetical one can pose with a paralyzed person, it is still not an issue of the caretakers' rights to bodily autonomy being challenged.If you have a newborn baby and a mother who does not want to take care of that newborn baby, then the solution is simple; she gives up her rights to the baby and someone else takes care of it. It still needs her permission to be able to use her body for survival, but in this case, if she chooses not to grant it, it can survive in other ways. This is not the case with an inviable fetus.
Debate: Should abortion be made illegal?
Side: pro life

How can the body of a woman be infringed upon when a woman knows the result of sexual intercourse is a fetus? You are failing to understand that a parasite can only be from the animal kingdom and not the human kingdom because the fetus itself is from the family of homo sapiens. A parasite feeds from the host and also injures the host at the same time causing injury. There is no proof of that in a fetus. For a parasitic relationship, those elements of science have to exist. But a mother should not recuse herself from the birth of her fetus when the fetus contains her DNA and is equivalent to murder. Murder is the intentional taking of a human life which in this case refers to abortion itself as well. If a mother chooses not to take care of her child after she gives birth to it, she can be criminally prosecuted for criminal negligence. And if she chooses to give the child away for abortion, then the child will still need the help of another foster mother for survival.