azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross is the secong most physically demanding sport out there hands down. World champiuonship soccer is the first in a FAMOUS study. a motocross work out compared to a football workout is hands down unequal. Motocross work outs consist of everyday work outs (if your a pro/ national amateur rider) such as cardiovascular, endurance, mental strength, physical strength, and HEART. You have to have heart to be a motocross rider. let alone a professional. Football, i can pllay football right now because in motocross you dont have time to figure out your strategy or play if someone is pressuring you. it's insticnt. I've had my friends THAT PLAY FOOTBALL do cardio workouts and go to the gym with me and say that can't keep up with me in the workouts. everytime i go to the track i do 4 30 minute motos straight to be the best. Football is a joke. Everyone on the football side look at the points. Enough Said.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

motocross fo sho!!! i was playing football maybe 1 year and I was pretty good actually, but it was so fucking boring, so i started to ride motocross, and holy fuck!!! it was so extremly hard, and i was training much much more than i did when i was playing football, you cant even compare football to motocross. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP1A8xydXtE  //nuff saidsry for bad english xDD
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I support motocross for the obvious reason. Its harder. This isnt to say football players arent in great shape also, but at the age of 14 I was racing Sportsman, Open A, 250A, and winning. These are three of the most difficult classes to race ever. Keep in mind I was 14 and beeting 20-24 year old men who had grown up riding. I could run a sub 6 minute mile, do at least 50 pull ups with easeand bench over 150 pounds. At that age I was in better shape then most football players were at 14. I had what most racers endure, a life changing crash. That bike you sit on for 30 minutes or less before you run out of gas? Yeah it broke 5 of my ribs, myfemur, gave me a severe concussion causing damage that gives me nightmares I still wake up screaming to, and stopped my heart for 38 seconds. How many football players can say that? Not even this but the amount of endurance it takes to race a 20 lap race on a bike that weighs AT LEAST double you takes way more endurence then it takes to play a football game. Anyone who thinks motocross is twisting a throttle and sitting on a bike has clearly never raced before. Mind you all of those things I was phsyically capable of I could do at 14. And I'm a girl. Both sports require physical skill, but motocross takes more. Period the end.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

i race motocross and play football i can say for a fact motocross is way more demanding than football!
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Does anybody remember Dean Wilson riding with a broken wrist???? So football players back of!
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

MX at the pro-level (Race duration: 30-minutes plus 2 laps) is an endurance sport, like soccer or medium distance running. This is apparent by the medium to very low amount of muscle mass the competitors can "preserve". Football is an explosive sport that does require a certain and very specific type of endurance, but the participants can, obviously, maintain a high degree of body weight and muscle mass that no MX athlete could ever keep, or even use because it requires too much aerobic capacity to support. Obviously the MX athlete is an endurance type of athlete. Being a "winning" pro MX athlete requires the same aerobic capacity as running for 30-36 minutes at approximately a 6-minute per mile pace and stopping to do a few push ups, pulls ups and squats at intervals along the way. In football only a few of the receivers, (skinnier guys) could ever do that. Endurance athletes are required to be skinny, even if they don't start out that way, and explosive athletes do not have to be, but can be. Its a different challenge, both are specialized. MX is more challenging for one reason; there are many times fewer people in the world that are genetically able to perform to the levels needed to be successful in MX, unlike football that has thousands of excellent athletes. So, MX is the most challenging, by far.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I am a motocross racer myself . there are a lot of people out there that think football is harder than motocross . well im not trying to push football down but in motocross you do a lot of physical demanding stuff . believe me , its not hard to move a bike around that is bigger than you . so MOTOCROSS IS HARDER
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Alright I've played both and motocross is harder. It is so much stress on your body and physically demanding. People saying football takes more mental strength then motocross but how do you figure. In football you have plays and the conditions won't change. Motocross there are no plays and track conditions change every moto not to mention it takes years to learn what to do in each situation you will get into during each moto. Lets see a football player throw a whip and bring it back that takes some thought. Also there is much more of a risk every race can be your last. I broke my shoulder in a race once and got up and kept racing did tend to my broken shoulder and torn labrum until my moto was over let's see a football player do that.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I dont race, first of all. I have played football. I can end this whole arguement by saying that motocross is by far a more challenging sport. I do ride, on trail. I do drag race. I wouldnt even want to race on a track. The level of danger there is on that track during a race is FAR BEYOND any other sport. There are so many variables. The Bike, the rider, other bikes, other riders, your condition, track condition, weather, temperature. Plus, if you put a football player on a bike for the first time, they wouldnt even know were to begin. They wouldnt know how to shift. A MX racer had to learn how to use a clutch. And now, that is the easiest thing to him about racing, were a football player would be in a whole other world. Trust me, if motocross was easy, everyone would do it, because flying through the air with that machine and passing up someone faster than you on a track is about the best feeling in the world.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

OK, First of all whoever created this topic does not know anything about MX as they said "In motocross you sit on a vehicle for 30 minutes or less....then you run out of gas." 1000000% NOT TRUE. I have done MX most of my life but before MX, i played football...SOOOOO Boring and i know you do have to sprint alot but in MX you have to stand, sit, stand, sit its a constant battle with your bike. Fall of in MX...IT WILL HURT and i know you can brake a leg in football but you can brake your neck and back instantly in MX. This would happen in most races...NOT FOOTBALL. My last point would be the wimpiness of football. If you fall over/get tackled then you sit on the floor,crying like a baby without bottle, in Mx your straight back on your bike!!!!! People who disagree with this please feel free to comment.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Football is typically a physical sports that every casualties or injury in this sports is just normal as it is part of physical movement that is need in this sport, while motocross is more dangerous and extreme sports that is not only involves physical but also your mental awareness to every obstacle to pass out in the track. Listed in the source below why football is one of the most secure sports and most played.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

so, you people who think football is better and harder you are so very wrong. It takes no skill to run a football up and down a field, you haven't had pain if you haven't rode a dirt bike. Motocross, you get so tired you just want to rip your own arms off. When you ride you have the fear of jumping into the air and coming back down on your back. I never see anyone get hurt playing football, motocross, ever race there is broken bones. So its best for you to stay with football because if you think football is hard you would never servive on a dirt bike.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Football may be tough but racing motocross is a lot harder. In motocross you are starting on line with 40 other riders starting at the Same time going 40 mph into a tight corner and people saying you have to remember plays in football in motocross you have to remember which lines are the bestowed to take and if you don't remember you can go down with a few other rider and you have to be able to take some big hits because you can make one little mistake and fly off your bike and not land on grass but hard packed dirt from a great distance.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

i play foot ball and ride motocross and i know how hard football can be but motocross is hands down more physicaly demanding
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

What about professional football? We are trying to compare the physicality of professional sports.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

you say that you sit on a bike for 30 minuets then run out of gas i dont know what bike your ridineg but if you run out of gas in 30 minutes you have a hole in your tank
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

motocross is hand down harder. I want to see your fifteen year old bench-press more than some 8 year olds I know, I am not saying football is easy anything classified as a sport is hard but mx is just way harder, the training the endurance the list just goes on and on football is basically running around throwing and catching a ball, you do need endurance but most plays last about 4-8 seconds MAX then its another break and a drink of water almost, moto is just hands down harder
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

You fucking football faggots don't know what the fuck your talking about even if you rode dirt bikes you can't just put around and think your lazy asses are gonna get a work out you need to be actually menouvering around and going hard on a track to get a work out and I garruntee that none of you dumb fucks could do that most pro football players are playing at a lot older age than pro dirt bike riders because dirt bike racing is so much harder on your body than football and at a certain age your body just won't take it anymore on dirt bikes you fucking football people don't know what those rider go through but you fucking pussies are to fucking stupid to realize it.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

O.k first of all this guy is obviously on drugs because if you think that all you do in motocross is sit down and twist the throttle and you think kicking a ball around and by the way before professional pussy soccer players play they take 12 kind of medicine which are kind of like steroids in motocross you don't you work hard you train hard and you get what you get from the results, and please before you say soccer is a harder sport than motocross please first grow some balls actually get a bike and ride it but like the professionals do it and I'm 100% sure that you will understand that motocross is not just sitting and twisting the throttle.the greatest and toughest sport in the world. motocross is a sport for real men and thin lean sexy women. a sport that is done by BRAVE people as it is very dangerous. while real men and the nice ladies race motocross other little boys play soccerok so now you little pussy's grow some balls. and go on youtube and look at how hard they trained and how people have actually died and also there was a guy called Jeffrey Herlings (MX2 was about to win a championship) he lost a championship because he broke his femur but he did one of the bravest things in the world he picked up his ass and he rode the last race with a broken femur, of course he didn't win but that is what growing some balls means.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

He is talking about American football, not pussy soccer.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I'm going to go with motocross here.If you look at all of the skills involved in playing football, one might believe that football is the more physically challenging of the two- but also consider that few, if any, football players emphasize all of the skillset and conditioning required to play football. Football players tend to specialize, and focus on their role. A receiver, for example, has a larger emphasis on speed, agility, and hand eye coordination. Raw physical strength, while beneficial, isn't generally a huge requirement for a receiver, and a particularly high level of endurance isn't particularly needed either- if a receiver can maintain full speed long enough to cover the entire field, he has all the endurance he needs given the breaks between plays. A lineman, on the other hand, benefits from speed and agility, and to a lesser extent hand eye coordination, but these aren't as firm a requirement for the position as is raw strength, endurance, and mass. Players can be benched and replaced in football as well; individual performance is important, but it is the team that plays, and a players ability to coordinate well with his or her team outstrips individual athletic ability, generally speaking.Motocross, while more limited in overall skill and athletic requirements generally speaking, does not allow for 'specialization.' You don't get a 'dump stat' in Motocross, you don't get frequent breaks, you don't generally get to bench yourself and let someone else win for you. Motocross also requires significantly more physical endurance as well as the ability to endure harsher conditions.TLDR: If every football player had to be able to play every position at a professional level, football would outstrip motocross in terms of physical challenge in my opinion- but as they do not, I feel that Motocross comes out ahead.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

yeetnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnbnbnbnbnbnbn
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross is a lot harder than people say it is. People think that it is just sitting on a bike and twisting the throttle to make it go. If you guys are not tough enough to go out and try it yourself then don't have an opinion. No bike, No opinion.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I am voting for motocross because I race motocross and play football. When I'm racing it is so much more physical than when I'm out on the field. When I finish a moto I am normally sweating so much that i have to go and take a freezing cold shower to cool myself off. In football you may have other people to worry about on your team but you get breaks every time you come off from defense or offense. Even if you were to play for the Broncos and come off and immediately need oxygen. It's the same for Pro Motocross racers at Thunder Valley except they don't get oxygen till the race is over. Plus the heat of the track the amount of fitness going into moving the bike around definitely would beat the fitness it takes for football.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

motocross is so much harder and wayy more physically demanding than football i have done both football for 7 years and motocross for 9 years and riding for 13 years and i'm only 16. During my 1st year during A squad i was in the entire game every game and going as hard as i could with difficulty but i was able to do it but after 1 motocross race (I race a yz250f 2011) i'm controlling a somewhere around 200 lbs (i don't know exactly) bike in head to toe gear in blazing heat with more limited vision than football with 20 other riders on the track taking up the same space as you and you're constantly pushing yourself to the limit for 10-15 minutes straight with no breaks (unless you crash) but even then all that energy that you were feeling is like gone all of a sudden your dead beat tired picking up a 200 lbs bike after crashing so you're in pain and getting up and going as fast as you can so u dont fall to far behind to extremely rough so its not exactly a break and you're 5x more tired after you fall than before. after a race i just want to go to my trailer drop the bike fall on the ground and just lay there but with football i can just walk off the field and stay upright and i can still walk around. with football you get like a 10 second break for every 10 seconds oh you go all out for 5 seconds holding back a guy is not that hard at all so no football is not more physically demanding that motocross.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

manouvering a 230lb bike around a track, with your heavy protection on, sweating inside of your helmet, pushing through arm pump while going as fast as you can over bumps and ruts and jumps and getting pelted with huge rocks, whilst looking out for other riders around you, the track gets more difficult each lap.motocross wins by a landslide in all aspects
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

When a Football player pulls a muscle they have cry, but when a motorcross rider falls of their bike and is riden over by other riders and get back on their bike. That is determination and is not being a little pussy. Motorcross is a lot more physical demanding and mental. Pro motorcross riders need to have a lot of endurance to keep on going for 20 min hitting every single bump, rut, burm and jump that is on the track and to have agility to dodge other riders. Yeah you need to be strong, fast and agile in football but when you do motorcross you need to be a lot more than what you have to be in football. Motorcross is not as easy as just sitting down and turning the throttle, you need to standing and trying to control a 250 pound bike that is bouncing around every where. If you do not have fast reactions in motorcross you are gonna have broken bones and punctured organs. When a motorcross rider breaks their bones they just get back on their bike to finish the race. They don't just fuck this I'm done, they just keep going and try their best. Very recently in the Australian Finke desert race KTM Fatory racer Toby Price broke his foot halfway through the race, did he stop, no he pushed on and finished the race 1st place. What does that tell. I know football players are weak as piss. Motorcross is a lot more physically challenging. Pro riders don't just kick a ball around for a couple of hours, no they have to train the assses of tell their are nearly dead so that when it comes to a race their body is prepared to absorb every bump and hits. If you don't think that Motorcross is the most physically challenging sport your a Cockhead
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

I completely agree with Mr. Dawkins. Not allowing a child to explore, is trapping him or her in a mindset. I think this is just as damaging as other forms of child abuse.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: No

I think this is just as damaging as other forms of child abuse.Really, so taking your kid to church is a s bad a s the couple who killed their 5 month old by leaving them in a car seat for 8 days.... Taking your kid to church is as bad as molestation huh? Why don't you try thinking before you type.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

http://bishop-accountability.org/priestdb/PriestDBbydiocese.html Don't know about leaving your kid in the car but the molestation thing, could have picked a better example..
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

Taking a kid to church isn't child abuse. Forcing them to believe is. It isn't as bad as anything physical, but your above comment is like saying teasing isn't bullying because it's not as bad as punching. Young kids are often very gullible.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

It's not the same as murdering children, but it still forces children to believe something that they don't believe. For example: if two Christian parents had a child, they would want the child to be Christian. But the child might believe in science and logic more than religion. Therefore the parents are forcing their children to do something they don't believe in, which could be seen as child abuse.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

Smacking a kid in the head is child abuse.Telling your kid if he doesn't conform to a books rules he will rott in hell for eternity is NOT child abuse.They are both bad, but one is legal and one is not. That's my point, and I believe Mr. Dawkins point.AngryGenX try thinking before you get angry.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: No

No, but I agree with the following points: it is to what extent and religion should not be forced upon. However, making a child do their homework for their own sake you could call trapping them in a state of boredom or unhappiness because they dislike doing it or even asking them to lose weight because they are too heavy. It depends on how old and mature they are - a young child and adolescents require the most input from parents as studies have shown.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

It really depends on what you are doing to "force" them. Needless to say, you're a really poor parent if you can't accept that your child has different views than you.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

Number 1, your brain washing them. Number 2, your not allowing them to discover the world and religion themselves. Their freedom is being token away. Also, they can't live their lives nor enjoy themselves because they live in fear. It's just another way to control people. We Need a law for this.America gives Women, Blacks, and handicaps rights, but not children. The USA is getting less democratic.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: No

Get back on here in 15 years... Tell me how wonderful and smart 13 year olds are and how they should be running the world.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: No

Children have no rights until they are legally an adult. The only right a child has is to be treated with dignity as a human being.
Debate: Is forcing your child to be a certain religion, a form of child abuse?
Side: Yes

That's really not fair. How a Lion is able to make choices for itself when he's only a few months, but a highly intelligent and mature 16 year old isn't able to make choices. Children are nothing but Slaves in the U.S Of A.