azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Everything must have been carefully thought out. It could not have just happened, as that is too much of a coincidence. Not only are there countless chances which all must have fallen correctly for life to have come to be by mere chance, these countless chances must have happened in order.It takes a great leap of faith to believe this. God is not an answer, it is a question, one that will be far greater a task to answer. The thing is though that the inception of life only needed to happen once, once it did then it would have the world as its oyster with everything it needed to grow and reproduce. Changing it's chances to becoming what it is today from very slim to reasonable.I really don't want to get into another one of your analogies even though this one is better it is still not sound. There is evidence that life could have come about by chance, check the work of Craig Venter, if man in his limited years of genetic science can produce a living organism in a lab using non-living ingredients then surely a nutrient rich earth with 1.5 billion years could have done it.http://www.jcvi.org/cms/research/projects/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell/overview/ If the chances are so high against monkeys on typewriters writing the complete works of Shakespeare, then how much more would they be against coincidence creating life out of nothing? That entire idea is stupid.I'm glad you find an idea held by the vast majority of scientists as stupid, I mean who are you, Just because the chances of something happening are very slight, there is no way of stating that it is impossible, just as the monkey typewriter analogy, who are you say what can happen in an infinite amount of time, I know I cant. It seems to me that you are of the opinion that what cannot be explained must then be attributed to god.I go into more detail on that below, if you want to see exactly how thought out creation is. Oh, and evolution isn't separate from creation. Evolution is part of creation. And yeah, it happened millions of years ago. What does that have to do with it?Evolution is part of creation? The question is since when? It is being used because the evidence is too overwhelming, just like anything else, it was a heretical idea when it came out and was mocked by the churches. It is being accepted because it is undeniable and this is then attributed to God. It is exactly what I've been saying the involvement of God is pushed into everything you creationists can find a space to put it. Also the evolution of hands and eyes happened millions of years ago, that was my point, God didn't just give them to you especially. Also evolution is still happening now.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

All causes have to have a first cause. According to the law of cause and effect as well as thermodynamics, what is the origin of the universe? If evolution is true what was it's first cause? Remember according to the two laws above no new matter or energy is created. And matter and energy can't create themselves (Big Bang). So what started it all?
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

There has to be a spark, or a trigger, for everything. If you look deep enough, you will come to a point that science can not explain, can not theorise, that is God, an inexplicable divine intervention that causes the cycle that created life. God then watched and guided, and ensured that the necessary catalysts were/are added at the necessary points.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

You seem very sure of yourself, how do you know all this? Are you stating that, because science can not currently explain something then it has to be God, please, this is too much of a leap of faith and you are drawing a conclusion based on lack of evidence rather than having any.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Reading your post I came away feeling you really found GOD in your life. Which is a wonderful spiritual experience. But ,, there is always a but... But, your experience is not unique to the Christian faith. Many others have found this GOD relationship through other avenues, and describe their personal experience in a similar way. All I am saying is there are many paths to finding GOD...
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

It is impossible to believe there is no God. Just because God is the creator. Therefore, with us as the creation. God has to be the Creator.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

It is impossible to believe there is no God.Atheists exist, so clearly, it is possible.Just because God is the creator. Therefore, with us as the creation. God has to be the Creator.The existence of the world is an effect, not proof that God caused it. There is no evidence except for scripture that God created anything, and scripture is not valid evidence by itself.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Atheists exist because they don't want to accept the fact that there is a God. If there was no God then why would you have to argue about it?Scripture is all the evidence I need for scripture cannot be disprove. For example, if your fingerprint was on a murder weapon. You would most likly be charged with the murder. Same with scripture it is the evidence that cannot be swayed or mistaken. Therefore you must come up with evidence not I!
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Atheists exist because they don't want to accept the fact that there is a God.If there was valid evidence for God, I am sure most atheists would be happy to accept his existence. If there was no God then why would you have to argue about it?This is absolute nonsense. Scripture is all the evidence I need for scripture cannot be disprove.Fantastic for you, keep it up. Don't assume it's enough for everybody. For example, if your fingerprint was on a murder weapon. You would most likly be charged with the murder.Scripture is not forensic evidence by any stretch of the imagination. At best, it is bystander testimony. To continue with the murder metaphor, it is akin to coming upon a murder scene and convicting someone when there is absolutely no evidence for their guilt except someone shouting, "I saw them do it!"Same with scripture it is the evidence that cannot be swayed or mistaken.You are wrong on both counts. Scripture has been scientifically refuted in a myriad of instances. Religious people constantly squabble over various pet interpretations of the rest of it. Feel free to continue believing it, but realize it is poor evidence when you are trying to convince logical or scientific people of the validity of your position.Therefore you must come up with evidence not I!When you make a claim, it's your job to provide evidence for it if you want other people to believe it.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

If there was valid evidence for God, I am sure most atheists would be happy to accept his existence. There is it’s called creation. You just don’t accept it.This is absolute nonsense. Nonsense looks to me like you don’t have a good argument or stable ground anymore.Fantastic for you, keep it up. Don't assume it's enough for everybody. Evidence is for everyone to see. That is why it is evidence??Scripture is not forensic evidence by any stretch of the imagination. At best, it is bystander testimony. To continue with the murder metaphor, it is akin to coming upon a murder scene and convicting someone when there is absolutely no evidence for their guilt except someone shouting, "I saw them do it!" Thank you for the correction, but you still have eye witness. Still going to jail. Also, Scripture is made of several writers therefore several eye witnesses.You are wrong on both counts. Scripture has been scientifically refuted in a myriad of instances. Religious people constantly squabble over various pet interpretations of the rest of it. Feel free to continue believing it, but realize it is poor evidence when you are trying to convince logical or scientific people of the validity of your position. Love your spirit, but you have no proof that scripture has been disproven by so called “science”. In fact, you are totally wrong. Look it up.When you make a claim, it's your job to provide evidence for it if you want other people to believe it. Wow, you said exactly what I said only with fluff. You still have nothing to disprove God is false. I have already proved God is true.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

There is it’s called creation. You just don’t accept it.There is no evidence that God is responsible for creation. It is equally probable that creation is the work of the deities of other religions, who also claim responsibility for the world. Nonsense looks to me like you don’t have a good argument or stable ground anymore.Nope, the assertion that arguing something somehow proves its existence is, indeed, nonsense.Thank you for the correction, but you still have eye witness. Still going to jail. Also, Scripture is made of several writers therefore several eye witnesses.Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable, and it would be unsound to convict someone with nothing but that to incriminate them. Especially when others have contradicting testimony (i.e.: other religions).Love your spirit, but you have no proof that scripture has been disproven by so called “science”. In fact, you are totally wrong. Look it up.The willful ignorance of reality that must be required to maintain this view to be absolutely astounding to me. Here's just a couple gigantic errors in the Bible that seem to have conveniently slipped your mind: Noah's flood, a young earth, and creationism.http://www.epicidiot.com/evo_cre/noahs_flood.htm#against http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-youngearth.html http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/search/topicbrowse2.php?topic_id=46 Wow, you said exactly what I said only with fluff. You still have nothing to disprove God is false. I have already proved God is true.Okay, I'll try to explain this in simpler terms. Let me know if it still trips you up somewhere.You are making a claim. I do not believe you.If you want me to believe you, you have to provide verifiable evidence.I do not, as I am not making a claim, I am just rejecting your claim until you have sufficient evidence. Finally, even if something doesn't exist, you are not going to find proof of its nonexistence because there is no such thing. If you disagree with this, please provide adequate evidence that unicorns do not exist.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

I love those so called evidences that are misinterpreted. Let's see Noah's flood seashells on top of mountains. Proof for the creationist. Young Earth, yeah around 6,000 years , any older you have major issues. The one I love is Sun shrinkage. Let it grow we burn up before 1 millinion years. Therefore Creationism explains evolution trips.So please explain seashells on mountains, If the sun was to grow back to the size it was when you think where would earth be. Explain how evoultion is not based upon faith. Therefore it is likewise religion not science.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

So please explain seashells on mountains,The earth is changing. Mountain ranges form, seas recede. Once, these mountains were at the bottom of oceans, but stratigraphy and the fossil records show us that a worldwide flood has not happened. If the sun was to grow back to the size it was when you think where would earth be.http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_arguments/sun_shrinking.html Explain how evoultion is not based upon faith. It has been observed to happen. Scientists are honest about the parts of evolution which are as of yet unknown; they make hypotheses, and defend their ideas, but they do not speak in certainties and they do not substitute supernatural being for gaps in knowledge. It is not faith based. It is fact based.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

The presence of God can be clearly seen in the way any person was born. If a different sperm of the billion ejaculated hit the egg, the person born would be totally different! The chance of how you are alive are a million to 1! And going back further all the way to the big bang, what is the chance that all the matter in the universe compressed to that small a level to give a required bang? This points your sheer existence is a miracle and the opposition, if they weren't born would argue that they just could not exist!
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

The presence of God can be clearly seen in the way any person was born. If a different sperm of the billion ejaculated hit the egg, the person born would be totally different! The chance of how you are alive are a million to 1! The chances of any single blastocyst resulting from a fertilization is just as unlikely as any other. The only reason you place significance on the formation of the blastocyst that ended up being you is that you are here, and have the consciousness to think about it. There is nothing more or less remarkable or divine about the formation of you than there would have been about the formation of one of the other millions or billions of children your parents could have had instead of you.If you have a dice with a million sides, each number only has a one in a million chance of turning up, but you know the dice is going to land on some number when you throw it; you don't need to have a God for that.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

"If a different sperm of the billion ejaculated hit the egg, the person born would be totally different! The chance of how you are alive are a million to 1!"The chances of me specifically might be a million-to-one, but the chances of any of the sperm making it are much higher. No matter who emerged you would make the same argument, but it would always be silly argument. "what is the chance that all the matter in the universe compressed to that small a level to give a required bang? "It didn't. Matter is made of elements and elements didn't start forming until well after the big bang. The big bang instituted the emergence of energy and the laws of physics, neither of which take up space in the manner you are implying.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Of course god is realwho do you think goes to sleep with your children at night,who do think gives us hope,who do you think gives you your home, family, love, food, and opportunitiesIt's sad to thinkthat anyone would deny the presence of godAnd god help me all of you that dont believe prepare forKARMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

"who do you think goes to sleep with your children at night,"Okay, this is just weird. If you put your kids to bed alone, they wake up alone, and there is no evidence of them having any visitations as they slept, why should we assume that any entity has gone to sleep with them?As far as the rest, there are observable explanations for the rest. Why assume that somebody "gave us" these things unless we observed it?Also, since karma is a Hindu and Buddhist notion that is intrinsic to reincarnation in the physical world, Christians who do not believe in reincarnation in the physical world are probably being sacrilegious by supporting its existence
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

God, as you describe him, is the basal personification of natural forces imposed by the human mind.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Whatever his or it's name is, whether it's a ball of energy, whatever it is.......there has got to be something.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

whether it's a ball of energy, whatever it is.......there has got to be something.Sure there is, and it's about 93 million miles away.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

God is real. Creation gives evidence to that fact. Enough said
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

God is real. Creation gives evidence to that fact. Enough saidSelf supposing argument. The very thing being explained cannot be evidence for it's cause.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

yes i personally think that god is true, but i am not judging any1 by what they believe in evry religin believes in different things and u can believe what u want, kk, but i think its quite obvious theat god is true, by the bibles around the world, the m,aiking nd creation of ppl, etc etc
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

I do believe in Jesus and God. Why when people put debates that Allah or whatever is real everyone agrees and when people make something about God or Jesus its wrong? Just like in schools People who believe in Jesus Christ cant speak but if a Muslim comes then they can do what they need to do. Its Not Fair!!
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Yes God is true. Have you ever questioned your self who created the earth. There has to be somone really powerful enough to create the earth and that is God. Also the Bible in the 4 gospels they have 4 different people that saw and recorded what Jesus did when He was alive.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

You know...what you pepople who don't believe in Him are worse than the worst morons this world has ever seen...Now tell me? If there are people who are demon-possesed by whose authority can we drive the out?!
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

God is true because He exists in the heart of the believer.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

God is indeed real, but I do not beleve in him as my savior. I am a follower of Lucifer.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

whos lucifer? I never heard of anyone saying they beleive in Lucifer.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

There is no evidence of God's existence, so I would say that God exists only in the minds of his followers.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

There is more evidence that God exists than there is evidence that He doesn't. Give me one bit of evidence that God does not exist, and I will give you evidence that he does. Saying that God doesn't exist is like closing your eyes and ears and mouth and jumping into the arctic sea, then saying the Earth doesn't exist. that is not true, you are merely ignoring Earth's existence in the face of all of the evidence that the Earth does exist.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

There is more evidence that god exists than there is evidence that He doesn't.Such as?give me one bit of evidence that god does not exist,The idea of God cannot be either proved or disproved because it is with out any clearly definable trait, outside of the description in the holy books, which are just opinion. I never stated that there was any proof of Gods non-existence, as I know there can never be.and I will give you evidence that he doesPlease do, I cant wait to hear this ground breaking piece of evidence.Saying that God doesn't exist is like closing your eyes and ears and mouth and jumping into the arctic seaHow is this so?then saying the Earth doesn't exist. that is not true, you are merely ignoring Earth's existence in the face of all of the evidence that the Earth does exist.Now you've lost me. I didn't say anything about the Earth not existing, that would be ridiculous. There is more than enough evidence for Earths existence. There is however none for God's existence.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Such as?Read my other posts here.The idea of God cannot be either proved or disproved because it is with out any clearly definable trait, outside of the description in the holy books, which are just opinion. I never stated that there was any proof of Gods non-existence, as I know there can never be.This is not proof, and if you cannot provide a counter-argument, then I have won. Stating that you never stated that you can provide evidence that God does not exist is as good as giving upPlease do, I cant wait to hear this ground breaking piece of evidence.See above (or read Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis)Now you've lost me. I didn't say anything about the Earth not existing, that would be ridiculous. There is more than enough evidence for Earths existence. There is however none for God's existence.This is a literary device a like to call an analogy. Perhaps you have heard of it. It compares two different things. You split my analogy into the two things and ignored the analogy in-between. I shall explain it to you in small words so that you can understand.God exists. The Earth exists too. There is a lot of proof of both God and Earth existing. You would not say that the Earth does not exist. But you say that God does not exist. You must be ignoring the proof of God. In order to ignore the proof of Earth, you would need to pretend you were in space. To come to darkness: close your eyes. To come to silence: water muffles sound, plus you can cover your ears. To come to cold: The Arctic sea is cold. To come to no atmosphere: you cannot breathe the water. To come to the floating sensation: You float in water.There is more evidence of God's existence than evidence that He does not exist.
Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Read my other posts hereI did, the complexity of the Universe is not evidence of God, this is anthropopathic. It seems that every time something new is discovered the creationists try to further push back the involvement of God.This is not proof, and if you cannot provide a counter-argument, then I have won. Stating that you never stated that you can provide evidence that God does not exist is as good as giving upI never stated that I had any proof, but you my arrogant friend have none either, your lack of understanding of the nature of the universe does not make compelling evidence.This is a literary device a like to call an analogy. Perhaps you have heard of it. It compares two different things. You split my analogy into the two things and ignored the analogy in-between. I shall explain it to you in small words so that you can understand.I'm quite aware of what an analogy is, but in order for them to work one has to equate two things that could be considered equal, you have not. Let me explain to you in small words Mr arrogant theist.God does not exist, but the earth does, there is a lot of proof for the existence of Earth but unfortunately none for the existence of God. But you say that God does exist, you must be ignoring the lack of any evidence of God. After this point I lost interest in following you BS analogy as it was broken down before it began and continued to become folly.There is more evidence of God's existence than evidence that He does not exist.There is no evidence for either side.
Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Firstly, I did not speak merely of complexity. I spoke of obvious set-up and thought behind it.But, you persist in saying that my arguments are not true because you don't believe them, without giving any reason why you do not believe them besides saying that you would prefer it if He did not exist. As such, I will have to try a different approach.Why did King Herod kill all of the babies when Jesus was born?Why did enormous masses of people sacrifice their lives merely because they refused to say that Jesus was not the Messiah?Why did St. Paul, who persecuted Christians and hated us with everything, suddenly convert to being a more devout Christian than most others?How did St. Joan of Ark, a girl with no military background, convince so many to side with her in battle, then survive numerous lethal injuries?Why did these people die: