azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

The bigger picture is that more and more innocents are stuck in mindless violence.They are in a civil war. You would have never cared if chemical weapons weren't used. The media had been covering Syria before the chemical attacks too. Did you pay attention then?The bigger picture is that we have the power to change it yet the majority of the population prefer to delude themselves in their cowardiceThe bigger picture is that Iran said they will bomb Israel if we attack Syria, sending us to war with them. Iran has nuclear weapons. The bigger picture is that our soldiers have been waiting to come home and we're just going to send them off to another war. The bigger picture is that our economy can't take another war. This could possibly lead to World War III.You can check out your words. The debate topic is still alive.So what? Intangible thought you meant sex too. I don't actually think sex is corruption. I've heard people say that before and you seem like they type that would say it. Bragging about achievements are done at FB. But if thats what can raise your self-esteem, then sure.So you're admitting that I had the better arguments? You seem to overestimate your knowledgeYou seem to lack it.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

Did you pay attention then?Yes, and now that I have the chance to do something, I have no intention of coweringThis could possibly lead to World War III.If it is a war brought by doing the right thing, I see no reason to fearI've heard people say that before and you seem like they type that would say it.Nope, but I dont like to talk about off topics. So ill skip this (if you dont mind)So you're admitting that I had the better arguments?I dont watch your arguments. Only you can decide yoursYou seem to lack it.Knowledge is not an excuse to be racist
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Yes, and now that I have the chance to do something, I have no intention of coweringWhat are YOU doing? Telling everyone on CD that you support going to war with Syria? That's pretty damn useless if you ask me, especially considering how thick-headed you've been throughout this debate. If you want to do something, then you need to get over there and help. You don't have to join the military. You can just fall within the rebels and fight among them. How about you help supply some humanitarian aid? That shouldn't be a problem, should it? You believe SO much in helping these people yet you are doing nothing to actually help them. That to me is a coward. If it is a war brought by doing the right thing, I see no reason to fearAssuming you aren't American, would you have jumped in the middle of our civil war? Let me make it even simpler, if you saw two people shooting at eachother, would you storm in there with your gun? Syria is in the middle of a civil war... we aren't allies with either side. What right do we have entering it? Nope, but I dont like to talk about off topics. So ill skip this (if you dont mind)That's fine with me. You probably shouldn't have brought it up in the first place.Knowledge is not an excuse to be racist How is that racism? For all you know, I may come from a Russian background. Would you call it racism if I said that the North Korean government is corrupt? No, because it's very well documented. Same with Russia. I remember not too long ago, I saw an interview with a Russian billionaire who pointed out that "corruption" is embeded in the Russian mindset. Russia has accepted that and they find no need to change as of yet.Their actions have been documented. They've blocked us from interferring with Syria before. They're going to do it again.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

What are YOU doing?Convincing more people to support the troops, letting my words be known and of course, practicing freedom of speech. I work best behind their backs, but give me a body meant for battle and you will see me on the front lines.Assuming you aren't American, would you have jumped in the middle of our civil war?If one violated the rules of the UN, yesIf you saw two people shooting at each other, would you storm in there with your gun?If it endangers the public, yesIt is is a duel between fools, noHow is that racism?Criticizing the government isnt racism. Racism is when you speak ill to the Russians in general. Putin may lead them to bad routes, but it is the people who decides where to go.And I dont suppose that they desire to protect a criminal side.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Convincing more people to support the troops, letting my words be known and of course, practicing freedom of speech.You're convincing people to support the troops? Uhhh... everyone suppports the troops... but they aren't the ones making the decision to attack Syria. Letting your "words be known" and practicing freedom of speech aren't doing anything for the Syrian people. So you aren't doing anything of value. I work best behind their backs, but give me a body meant for battle and you will see me on the front lines.You aren't working behind their backs. At least not in a way that is helpful to them. Are you crippled, old, or overweight? Crippled; then donate money. Old; I doubt you're too old... you can still give them aid. Overweight; not an excuse.If one violated the rules of the UN, yesThat's what drives you? Someone breaking a UN law? Give me a break! Then you should have joined the fight against America in 1999. Look it up. We've broken International Law multiple times.It is is a duel between fools, noThat's what the Syrian civil war is.Criticizing the government isnt racism. Racism is when you speak ill to the Russians in general. Give me an example of where I made a racist remark about Russia.Putin may lead them to bad routes, but it is the people who decides where to go.The people don't decide where to go... he's a dictator!And I dont suppose that they desire to protect a criminal side.Do you know anything about Russia?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

You're convincing people to support the troops? Uhhh... everyone suppports the troops.Rallies on the street and internet. Thats not my definition of supportLetting your "words be known" and practicing freedom of speech aren't doing anything for the Syrian people.It is, when the people will listen and allow themselves to be convinced"Enemy or not, if you are willing to listen, you are free to dine on my table"-Alexander the GreatYou aren't working behind their backs. At least not in a way that is helpful to them.I pay my taxes, and fight misinformed netizens. My skill set are limited to this. But if theres anything else you wish me to do, I am all earsThat's what the Syrian civil war is.Its not because a chemical weapon was used and makes a mockery of the UN.That's what drives you? Someone breaking a UN law? Give me a break! It isnt in the magnitude as big as what happened in Syria.Give me an example of where I made a racist remark about Russia.You just did: "The people don't decide where to go... he's a dictator!"Thats the same as saying "Russians are too stupid to decide their own enemy"Or did I misunderstood?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Rallies on the street and internet. Thats not my definition of supportOur president says if we go to war or not. Our soldiers just follow orders. Do you really think that our soldiers who have been fighting al-Qaeda overseas for 12 years, want to go over to Syria and help them?People don't want us to go to war because of our troops. The President ran for office claiming that he would bring them home. All he's done is add another war.I pay my taxes, and fight misinformed netizens. My skill set are limited to this. But if theres anything else you wish me to do, I am all earsMisinformed citizens!? LOL! You are the definition of a misinformed citizen.You just did: "The people don't decide where to go... he's a dictator!"Thats the same as saying "Russians are too stupid to decide their own enemy"That's not racism! That's the truth! Calling someone a dictator isn't an insult when they really are one.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

Our president says if we go to war or not. Our soldiers just follow orders.Then allow me to rephrase that to "Support the decision of the President"Now do you understand?Do you really think that our soldiers who have been fighting al-Qaeda overseas for 12 years, want to go over to Syria and help them?Punishing the accused isnt helping anyone but the civilians. It bringing an advantage to the other side is an unintentional bonusYou are the definition of a misinformed citizen.WhateverThat's not racism! That's the truth! Calling someone a dictator isn't an insult when they really are one.The fools are always sure-Socrates
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Then allow me to rephrase that to "Support the decision of the President"You sure have been doing a lot of rephrasing.Punishing the accused isnt helping anyone but the civilians. It bringing an advantage to the other side is an unintentional bonusHelping the civilians will have a significant cost if we try to help them through war. It's not smart.The fools are always sure-SocratesThat quote doesn't work as a response to my argument, because my information is based off of fact. However, it could be applied to someone who is positive that we should go to war but doesn't understand the awaiting consequences of the action... or in other words, YOU.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

You sure have been doing a lot of rephrasing.Does it matter?Helping the civilians will have a significant cost if we try to help them through war. It's not smart.Its called war if it is a conflict between nations. But if it is supported by the UN and have a major international support, its called "Justice".That quote doesn't work as a response to my argument, because my information is based of off fact.No facts has ever supported racismHowever, it could be applied to someone who is positive that we should go to war but doesn't understand the awaiting consequences of the actionFighting for something worth dying, or living under the comfort of the blanket?You make me sick
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Does it matter?Yeah, it shows that you screw up a lot.Its called war if it is a conflict between nations. But if it is supported by the UN and have a major international support, its called "Justice".No, it's called war. Attacking Syria will obviously start a confilict between our two nations. We'll also end up going to war with Iran. No facts has ever supported racismThat's the thing though, I never said anything racist. I described the Russian government and mindset. Things that they have even claimed about themselves. Sorry, but pulling the racism card on me isn't going to work.Fighting for something worth dying, or living under the comfort of the blanket?This isn't something worth dying over. It's not our fight! 62% of Americans don't want us to go to war.You make me sickSo the majority of Americans make you sick too? I can live with that.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

Yeah, it shows that you screw up a lot."It isnt about mistakes, it is about the courage of correcting it that makes a man wiser"-AnonymousNo, it's called war. Attacking Syria will obviously start a confilict between our two nations. We'll also end up going to war with Iran.If your reasons are true and good, i see no reason for coweringThat's the thigh though, I never said anything racist.You claimed that Russians are puppets of their government just because they are a dictatorship. And deny the chances of revolt. Your claiming they are stupidHow is that not racist?This isn't something worth dying over. It's not our fight!Again, when it involves severe violation of the UN laws, it isnt a war anymore. But a humanitarian crime. It isnt a fight, but punishmentSo the majority of Americans make you sick too? I can live with that.Taking comfort in numbers changes nothing about yourself. But I can understand your insecurities. Everyone wish to join the crowd"A fools paradise is a wise mans hell"-Thomas Fuller
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

"It isnt about mistakes, it is about the courage of correcting it that makes a man wiser""Stupid is as stupid does"-Forrest GumpIf your reasons are true and good, i see no reason for coweringThis isn't a boxing match, it's a a war between two nations. You claimed that Russians are puppets of their government just because they are a dictatorship. And deny the chances of revolt. Your claiming they are stupidI never said they were puppets. Holy shit, am I arguing with myself here? Your ignorance is incredible.Again, when it involves severe violation of the UN laws, it isnt a war anymore. But a humanitarian crime. It isnt a fight, but punishmentIt's still a war. A country is not a criminal. They will fight back and their allies will fight back as well. Taking comport in numbers changes nothing about yourself. But I can understand your insecurities. Everyone wish to join the crowdSince when did you start understanding stuff? You've been oblivious throughout this entire debate. Apparently, your lack of understanding is detrimental to your decision-making process. You blindly support things that you don't understand. You form your opinions in the same way that a child would. "Let's go to war with Syria because they did bad stuff to themselves". That pretty much sums up all of your arguments.Maybe you need to pay attention to what the crowd is saying. Those numbers send a clear message. One that you aren't catching on to."A fools paradise is a wise mans hell""In a modern war... you will die like a dog for no good reason"-Ernest HemingwayHey look! I can find quotes to support my argument too!
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

This isn't a boxing match, it's a a war between two nations.its a war between criminals and UNI never said they were puppets. Holy shit, am I arguing with myself here? "The people don't decide where to go... he's a dictator!That's not racism! That's the truth! "-GuitarGuyYou deny the capabilities of the Russians to start a rebellion against a leader who will force them to fight for a criminal. And claim they are stupid. How is that not racist?It's still a war. A country is not a criminal. They will fight back and their allies will fight back as well.No one wants to fight along side a criminal. Once Assad was proven accused, all the UN will turn against him or it will give a bad image to the supporting countries. That is allMaybe you need to pay attention to what the crowd is saying. Those numbers send a clear message. One that you aren't catching on to.You know what they say:"The moment you followed the herd, is the moment you lost your ability to think for yourself"Democracy isnt justice.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

its a war between criminals and UNThe UN consists of more than just our allies. Russia and China's UN veto is preventing us from legally taking action.You deny the capabilities of the Russians to start a rebellion against a leader who will force them to fight for a criminal. And claim they are stupid. How is that not racist?I never said they were stupid. They support Putin and his decisions. Nothing wrong with the people supporting their leader, who happens to be allies with our enemies. Russians tend to not like us.No one wants to fight along side a criminal. Once Assad was proven accused, all the UN will turn against him or it will give a bad image to the supporting countries. That is allNo one? Really? Then why are there countries defending Syria? You're so naive! Wake up!
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

The UN consists of more than just our allies. Russia and China's UN veto is preventing us from legally taking action.Question is, how long?Even Russia and China knows that there is no point in defending a country that kills its own people and cares nothing about them than trade of arms.I never said they were stupid. They support Putin and his decisions. Nothing wrong with the people supporting their leader,Americans are currently rallying againt Barrack because they do not like his decisions. What makes you think that Russians will not do the same once they found out that Putin is forcing them to fight for a criminal?No one? Really? Then why are there countries defending Syria?Defending Syria or fighting against America? Theres a difference
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Question is, how long?They won't give up until America takes illegal action.Even Russia and China knows that there is no point in defending a country that cares nothing about them.Russia has persuaded Syria to hand over all of their chemical weapons. Obama might agree that this is acceptable, but he's still considering going to war... so he obviously has ulterior motives for attacking them.Americans are currently rallying againt Barrack because they do not like his decisions. What makes you think that Russians will not do the same once they found out that Putin is forcing them to fight for a criminal?The thing about Russia is that they aren't stupid. Most of them are actually pretty smart. They know that their government supports Syria. Russians have the right to freedom of the press and they see global news just like us. The news isn't delayed over there. If they had a problem, they would have spoken up by now.Defending Syria or fighting against America? Theres a differenceBoth. France and the U.S. are the main advocates for attacking Syria, where as Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Pakistan, and Venezuela are among the few of Syria's allies who are against it.Iran and the terrorist organization Hezbollah, promised immediate retaliation if Syria is attacked.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

They won't give up until America takes illegal action.That would be the fault of America's impatienceObama might agree that this is acceptable, but he's still considering going to war... so he obviously has ulterior motives for attacking them.Till then, he has my supportThe thing about Russia is that they aren't stupid. Most of them are actually pretty smart. They know that their government supports Syria. Aye, and they also know that there is no solid evidence for who caused the chemical attack. I prefer to wait for the resultsBoth. France and the U.S. are the main advocates for attacking Syria, where as Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Pakistan, and Venezuela are among the few of Syria's allies who are against it.An alliance lasts only till your ally has done something worth of destroying your trust. Everything will be decided upon by the voice of the UNIran and the terrorist organization Hezbollah, promised immediate retaliation if Syria is attacked.The keywords there are "terrorist" and "extremist"The rest you can guess
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

That would be the fault of America's impatienceSo now you think patience is important? More and more civilians are dying each day we wait. If we're going to war, it would make sense to go now, would it not?Aye, and they also know that there is no solid evidence for who caused the chemical attack. I prefer to wait for the resultsYou can't support Obama and Putin at the same time, at least not regarding this matter. Personally, I agree with Putin's tactic, which is for the Syrian government to hand over their chemical weapons. Obama says he will look into this matter, but he is still pushing for an attack.An alliance lasts only till your ally has done something worth of destroying your trust. Everything will be decided upon by the voice of the UNHave you ever thought that maybe Syria's allies don't care that he gassed his own people? Not every country has the same moral principles.The keywords there are "terrorist" and "extremist"I never said "extremist", but yeah... and guess what happens if we don't attack? They don't retaliate. Iran isn't a terrorist organization though. They're Syria's most powerful Middle Eastern ally.
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

So now you think patience is important? More and more civilians are dying each day we wait. If we're going to war, it would make sense to go now, would it not?Being lazy is not being patient. And being reckless isnt being quick You said it yourself that this is a sensitive issue that can ignite a war. Except if the UN can approve the action first. Thats the quickest way possible Personally, I agree with Putin's tactic, which is for the Syrian government to hand over their chemical weaponsThat we can agree onObama says he will look into this matter, but he is still pushing for an attackWhen that happens, my loyalty to Obama will be lostHave you ever thought that maybe Syria's allies don't care that he gassed his own people? Not every country has the same moral principles.A country such as that will never last. Once Assad was proven guilty, the only ally he will have are terrorists who can double cross him anytime.guess what happens if we don't attack? They don't retaliate.But there were no plans of attacking them. They are just using Syria as an excuse to pick a fight against America (again).Typical terroristsIran isn't a terrorist organization though. They're Syria's most powerful Middle Eastern ally.But they are ruled by extremists. It makes no difference, does it?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: Yes

Being patient is not being lazy. And being quick isnt being recklessYou do know that "isn't" is supposed to have an apostrophe in it, right? You've been leaving them out the entire debate.You said it yourself that this is a sensitive issue that can ignite a war. Except if the UN can approve the action first. Thats the quickest way possibleRight... you contradict yourself... A LOT.That we can agree onThat's good, but what about the justice you kept talking about? You wanted the people responsible to be held accountable for their actions. You had basically said that you want revenge for the civilians who died.When that happens, my loyalty to Obama will be lostWhy? An attack is what you wanted all along.A country such as that will never last. Once Assad was proven guilty, the only ally he will have are terrorists who can double cross him anytime.You have no proof of that. Patterns throughout history can almost guarantee us that his allies will remain loyal. He'd have to personally affect them in a negative manner, in order for any sort of tension to arise within their alliance.But there were no plans of attacking them. They are just using Syria as an excuse to pick a fight against America (again).Many people believe that we're just using Syria as an excuse to attack Iran.But they are ruled by extremists. It makes no difference, does it?What makes you think that they are ruled by extremists?
Debate: Should the U.S. completely ignore the Syria situation?
Side: No

That's good, but what about the justice you kept talking about?Why? An attack is what you wanted all alongJustice can have more forms than you think. Surrendering the chemical weapons will give us no more reason to fight. But a sanction will still be proposed sooner or later.You have no proof of that. Patterns throughout history can almost guarantee us that his allies will remain loyal.No one wants to protect a criminalThats all you need to know.Many people believe that we're just using Syria as an excuse to attack Iran."Believe". Its not a fact, but I am open to be convinced.What makes you think that they are ruled by extremists?They are aware that they are ruled by extremists