azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: never

LEAVE ME ALONE! I HAVE THE RIGHT TO STAND UP FOR MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

And i have the right to disagree with you. And just because you can stand up for yourself doesn't mean you can curse at people.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: never

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO HARASS ME! YOU WILL LEAVE ME ALONE!
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

Common sense is obviously not making an impact on you, so by trying to explain the truth to someone as ignorant as you is just a waste of my time. So you know what, i will leave you alone.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: never

Unless i see you cursing at people. And also if i see an argument of yours i wish to debate, i will, but if you are obviously not going to debate me and just say "leave me alone!" then i will.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: never

YOU WILL LEAVE ME ALONE NO MATTER WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: never

Please calm down.These sparse outbursts of rage are not supporting your position as a Christian.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

That was a long time ago. I have been behaving now .
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

Oh sorry, I did not notice the time it was posted.But my message is still clear.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

And neither did any one here ask for yours. Why don't you actually dispute his argument rather than just get defensive? Are you that cowardly?
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: never

I do not owe anyone anything. I am not here to make friends. If you are going to be disrespectful, you will need to leave me alone. You do not have the right to follow me around harass me. Goodbye.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

I do not owe anyone anything.Neither do I.I am not here to make friends.You aren't making friends even if that was your intention..If you are going to be disrespectful, you will need to leave me alone.I have been more respectful than necessary to you. And that is a gracious move from me that you have not reciprocated at all.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

You aren't making friends even if that was your intention..I bet that struck a nerve lol!
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha... Oh, reading these made my day
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

I know what you mean but I won't suppose you because you clearly didn't explain your answer so others can understand.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

if you suck at being a parent and havent instilled trust and respect and good reasoning skills in your children, yes you will need to violate their privacy and commit this kind of injustice. however you should also realize that you should not have had children because it is obvious that you were not ready to have them by your apparent failure.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

I would say tat it would be a violation of privacy, but the parents would get to know what their child really feels or is going through. but i bet there are better ways to know your child.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

For the most part, the clear answer is only sometimes in unusual behavior change or mood.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

It will break my heart if my child resents me but if your child is not willing to express his/her feelings or thoughts, then what is best is to read their diary.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

I suppose it depends on circumstances at that time but if you don't think you're kids secretly killing himself/herself behind your back, than their's probably no need to check their daily thoughts. Of course the fact that you need to read the diary really shows how well you know the kid.
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

I can admit only one situation where it can be done: if you really see that a child is something very serious and not, as it is closed for any reason from you. Of course, it's better if you could establish a trust relationship. But not all that easy in life. There are such cases, that is scary: different sects, drugs, unrequited love, humiliation is different. And teenagers are vulnerable and closed. I wonder how would it feel to parents, all of which are correct, do not read, and took the child and with a committed? And could have been avoided .... You just have to be very careful in any case not to talk to them about the read, but just try to correct the situation. And if all goes well with the child, then of course it is not necessary to climb in his life. Wants to - he will tell
Debate: Do parents need to read their child's diary in order to know them better?
Side: sometimes

I support the idea to read the diaries of their children! No matter how unethical accused parents, the "penny price" for failing to find a common language and all that, but it should be read. Another question is how you would have acquired knowledge? - Here also think about the ethics and all the small stuff, to my knowledge does not make things worse.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

The inquisitions, the Crusades, the conflicts between Protestants and Catholics that divided Ireland for decades, the conflict between Muslims and Jews right now in Palestine and Israel, WWII partially (the Christian tradition of hating Jews), the 100 years war, 9/11 etc etc.Religion is also a significant motivator in other laws, as the bible advocates slavery and genocide, in fact, god sanctioned a bunch of wars in the bible, read it if you don't believe me.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

WWII partially (the Christian tradition of hating Jews)Very good point. People often omit this one. There are slews of theories as to why Hitler singled out the Jews for extermination, and I've heard some pretty weak theories put forward (i.e. he got denied from art school... really?), but people always forget or don't want to knowledge that Hitler was a Catholic, as was much of 1930-40s Germany, which means ritualistic Jew hatred (on account mainly of the crucifixion) had been taught to them by their religion for hundreds of years running. Exterminating Jews was something Hitler knew the German population could support because they had already been conditioned by their religion to hate Jews. That, and the Jews lacked a central Jewish state with which to retaliate. If Hitler had picked on Christians he would have lost support in his own country and found Britain, America, and Italy up his ass a lot quicker. If he had chosen Muslims to exterminate he would have had the entire Middle East at war with him. Choosing Jews meant that he was discriminating against a small, minority population spread across several countries, which, if you're trying to carry out genocide, is probably a lot easier than waging war on a collection of countries.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

If Hitler was a strong believing catholic why did he try to kidnap and kill the Pope. Hitler did not hate Jews because he was a Christian, he used Christianity as a tool to get the Nazi public to hate Jews by using the teachings of Martin Luther. If you so strongly believe that Christianity is anti-semite please find a passage in the Bible which implies such.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

If Hitler was a strong believing catholic why did he try to kidnap and kill the Pope.The first word on your source is "alleged." There is as much evidence to support that he tried to kidnap/kill the Pope as there is to refute it. Most of the evidence supporting it also seems to be coming from Nazis, too. Even if we assume the unknowable and say that he did in fact try to capture/assassinate the Pope, the rational is there and doesn't conflict with Hitlers Catholisism. One source states he didn't want the Pope to end up in the hands of the allies; another claims the Pope was collaborating with Hitlers enemies, and Hitler was afraid the Pope would use his influence to turn the Catholics against the Final Solution. Additionally, Pius XII was a Catholic, obviously, and even though he knew well what was happening to the Jews did nothing about the mass exportation of Jews from his country to Nazi death camps. Another of your sources says that the plan to capture the Pope was to ensure that he remained quiet while all of this was going on, but, as you can see, it was unnecessary; the Pope never did a damn thing about it. And now they're in the process of making him a saint for it. "Jerusalem has responded to His call and to His grace with the same rigid blindness and stubborn ingratitude that has led it along the path of guilt to the murder of God." - Pope Pius XII, 1942The Bible is bereft of blatant antisemitism; this is something preached in churches and evident in other religious dogma, some of which I have been privy to, personally, and thought it was pretty messed up. A lot of very intrinsic Christian ideas, like the Trinity or their stance against abortion, have no Biblical basis, but this doesn't make them any less Christian. The Bible is just a part of the Christian faith, not the whole thing. You dont need to look in the Bible to see evidence of the Christian mindset regarding Jews; just look at your history.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

I am not sure what you mean.Even if Hitler himself was pure atheist, the Nazis were not.Even if Hitler was a Muslim, the fact that he COULD use faith in Catholicism is proof that religion can cause war.If those people, the Nazis, had not been religious, they could not have been convinced by Hitler or by religion to kill Jews simply because they were Jewish.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

He was christian read Mein Comf (i still cant spell that). Also he said "tradition" of hating jews. It's not in the bible but the hatred is brought on by christians hating jews for killing their lord.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

Hitler abused Christianity and used it to start his own anti-semite cult.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

All of those wars you've mentioned are primarily political, religion was merely an excuse to get the support of the people.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Exactly, no one would go to war just because of a tiff between politicians, but when they convinced them that the almighty celestial dictator of the universe wants them to, they complied."Good people do good things, bad people do bad things, but to get good people to do bad things, that takes religion."None of those wars would have got the go ahead without religion (except perhaps WWII, which was also due to an acceptance of authoritarianism brought on by nationalism).
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

"Exactly, no one would go to war just because of a tiff between politicians, but when they convinced them that the almighty celestial dictator of the universe wants them to, they complied."It was not that God wanted them to go to war, but that they interpreted it as such. I wish to point out that there would have been much more wars if there were no religious people as the only reason people wouldn't kill one another is because they see murder as a sin."None of those wars would have got the go ahead without religion (except perhaps WWII, which was also due to an acceptance of authoritarianism brought on by nationalism)."*Of course WWII would have happened without religion, if you study the second world war, religion isn't one of the reasons it happened. The hundred years war was a fight about control of the French throne. It is more nationalism instead of religion that causes these conflicts especially the Ireland and Israel conflicts.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

It is more nationalism instead of religion that causes these conflicts especially the Ireland and Israel conflicts.Ireland, maybe, but Israel? Why did they pick that specific chunk of land? Why not carve out a piece of Germany for the Jews? Israel is not exactly prime real estate; it's valued for it's religious significance. If all the monuments and temples and holy sites were to be demolished, Israel would just be another small strip of arid desert in a sea of arid deserts. Not exactly worth fighting for.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

If their millenia old religion wanted them to go to war over the Holy land how come they've only fought over it in the last century?
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Do you just say things because you want them to be true?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_in_Judaism Perhaps you should read, and know WHY Jews and Muslims want Israel.Not to mention, the Holy Land has always been desired by Christians, Muslims and Jews.Because of that, there has been war again and again, and if not war, tensions that often erupt into violent confrontation.I'm not sure what you're arguing though.Unless you completely close your mind to what we're saying, you are wrong. What we've said is true. You can't say "Well, maybe Hitler was an atheist" It doesn't matter, people fight because of religion. Denying that is absurd.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Historically Jews have been unable to do much more than be the subject of discrimination, exodus and mass execution. So I could see how that would put them in a position of being unable to wage a holy war for the holy land. But religions have been fighting over the holy land for hundreds and hundreds of years, not just recently.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Yes religion causes wars. The thirty years war and the crusades to name some.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

But is how can you be so sure that religion cause war but war is formed by taking the mentality of the peron.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

But is how can you be so sure that religion cause war but war is formed by taking the mentality of the peron.Because Europeans would have no other reason to go to Jerusalem if not for religion. Also the Spanish would have no reason to persecute other religions if not for their religion.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Well, religion has both a personal, spiritual dimention and a social dimention. I want to make it clear that the social dimention is the one wich has the potential to be dangerous. If someone has a world view which is considered the truth, no matter what information later is apparent, that is very dangerous, and can lead to fanaticism. Now, if a belief system is closely tied to your social group, your main source of belongingness, and this groups turns radical, it is very conducive to war. Simply because we do just about anything to maintain our bonds with the poeple we love the most (which ironically leads to hate against the ones who do not share your beliefs). People that we have known our whole lives, and share a history with, are very strongly tied to our own self image and feeling of identity. The sad part is though, that this then leads you to lose your own integrity, in the pursuit of maintaining the integrity of your group. You lock your mind in one belief system, that just cannot be rocked by anything. If your group or personal belief is threatened, either physically or simply denied, the flight-or-flight response which is supposed to save your life is activated. We are genetically hardwired to believe in something, a lot of science suggests. This does not mean that God exists or that there is deity in us, it's just that our urge to want to understand the world as a place with meaning and order is so incredibly strong. It's tough to admit that we know so little, and are so small in the vastness of it all.Sacrifice is sometimes necessary in order to keep a social bond with the ones who matter to you the most. But when social bonds are so closely linked to a belief system, and that belief system can have leaders organizing the entire group to do something for the sake of "God", or any other external form of moral imperative, a lot of horrible things can happen. We lose touch with the actual world.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Yes, religion causes war. People will do anything for something they believe so much in. Ever heard of the crusades.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Religion causes war, yes!But that doesn't meen, that if whole world became atheists, all wars would end.It would still be war everywhere.The world will always find a way to fight.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

But that doesn't meen, that if whole world became atheists, all wars would end.It would still be war everywhere.There would still be small fights and disputes but wars as they are now would end. Because no one would see the point in fighting. Why fight if working together is far more beneficial to everyone? In fact, war is beneficial to no one.If you don't trust me then trust the countries with the least religious. Look at how well it is going for them. When were they last in a war? Or rather, when did they last start a war? The only war they will ever take part of is when someone attacks them (unless they give some aid to fight some very possible threats to them as well).How many wars are there caused by religion? Nearly all of them (if you include the fact that religion keeps people stupid then all of them). Remove religion and you remove those wars.It would still be war everywhere.That is so wrong. There would be wars only in very few places, if at all.The world will always find a way to fight.No they won't because people will be smarter and see that fighting is pointless. Religion, fundamentally, keeps people stupid and instigates war.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

Wars wouldn't end. Some people enjoy looking evil or annoyinv others, and on a large scale this could cause a war.The Falklands war wasn't about religion, it was about greed. Geoffrey Chaucer said Greed is the root of all [wars], not religion, and he was right.A smaller scale example wouls be me arguing with my sister, it isn't about what we believe; sometimes it is just to annoy one another.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

Wars wouldn't end.They would. Perhaps one small war here and another small one there and that is it, even then they wouldn't last long.Some people enjoy looking evil or annoyinv others, and on a large scale this could cause a war.People on average would be a lot smarter if they weren't religious. That means they would much less inclined to follow the "evil" people, because they would be far more inclined to see who they really are.The Falklands war wasn't about religion, it was about greed.Greed is in the same alley as is stupidity and religion.Geoffrey Chaucer said Greed is the root of all [wars], not religion, and he was right.I do not know who that person is and neither do I care.Why is it like this [wars]? Did he say it like that? Greed comes from stupidity, religion is built upon greed and religion itself is also stupid and promotes stupidity by its illogical rules.Who were they, Pkistan and Palestine (something like that)? The morons fighting over, basically, religion.Terrorists, aren't they just that because of their religion? Oh yes they are.Whoever that person is, or was, was wrong. People fight because of stupidity. Religion keeps people stupid by not allowing anything that contradicts it. Religion might have been built from greed but now it is simply stupidity that promotes the same. And greed is stupidity because those persons don't know better. Would I like power, money, and all that? Oh, yes I would. Would I like to keep it all to myself? If I didn't know better I would.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: Yes

One small war here and ... another thereExactly, you've said it yourself, now.You quoted me again after this and replied with somrthing completrly irrelevant. Greed is in the same alley as stupidity and religionNo it is not. Greed is a small aspect of human nature, whereas religion is not a stupid thing and only some people are stupid.Then whilst talking about Chaucer you said I do not know who that was. I cannot belive this! He is in some ways regarded as better than Shakespeare at English.Greed comes from stupidityNo, it comes from human nature.Religion is built upon greedSo religion is built from human nature. Wars therefore (from your perspective) come from human nature.People fight because of stupiditySo not because of religion? Glad we've established that.
Debate: Does religion cause war?
Side: No

Exactly, you've said it yourself, now.You quoted me again after this and replied with somrthing completrly irrelevant.Something I said, "There would still be small fights and disputes but wars as they are now would end."Your argument was apparently irrelevant.No it is not.Yes it is.Greed is a small aspect of human natureI could as well say that sharing things is human nature, so is doing good."Human nature" is made up by humans. It is subjective. Some people don't like collecting things, some like sharing them, some like hoarding them, some are disinclined to give them away, some like helping others - all can be natural. Or environmental.whereas religion is not a stupid thing and only some people are stupid.Religion is a stupid thing. Keeping people stupid just so they could be manipulated and controlled is stupid.Then whilst talking about Chaucer you said I do not know who that was. I cannot belive this!That's right, I do not know who that is and neither do I care. I'm not from England, nor any English-speaking country. I wouldn't care even if I was.He is in some ways regarded as better than Shakespeare at English.Irrelevant to me.No, it comes from human nature.Human nature is subjective and made up, just as is religion. There are people from "bad" side to "good" side, all can be considered "human nature", meaning "human nature" is a pointless concept.Wrong, stupidity. If you are smart you share things to improve everything. What is the point of hoarding something you will never use yourself nor need yourself and never allow others use? There is no point, other than being stupid.Greed is a form of stupidity.So religion is built from human nature. Wars therefore (from your perspective) come from human nature.Wrong, as I have already explained.So not because of religion? Glad we've established that.Religion does cause wars, but religion is also a kind of stupidity. The kind that isn't natural, the kind that is taught to a person since birth (brainwashed).Religion keeps people stupid, therefore it makes them more inclined to fighting.