azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Why come up with something so off topic and irrelevant?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Marriage is between a man and a woman. I have no problem with Civil Unions; literally couldn't care less. However Marriage is a sacred institution and rite and no group has the right to erase it in favor of their own branding. More importantly get the government out of marriage.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Marriage used to be between a man and a girl in many places. It also used to be between two people of the same ethnicity. If it has changed before, why can it not change again? Seeing as how it has already changed in many places, who are you to tell them others?Additionally, why should they accept a "Civil Union" (something that marriage already is)? There is no compelling interest for the state to create another institution simply for the purpose of distinction, especially considering separate but equal is inherently unequal. Marriage in this country is not a sacred institution, it is a civil contract as well as a civil right (as per Loving v. Virginia) and therefore protected by the Constitution. You and your group have no right to deny said right to anyone, and homosexuals are not trying to "erase it" in any way, shape, or form.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

I am against it, because in the Bible, it says that marriage should be between a man and a woman.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

That's the issue. To rest your stance upon something that is debatedly "valid" (Bible), weakens your argument. Not everyone believes in that.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

http://www.gaychristian101.com/ .
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

it also says to stone non belivers to death.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

We've had plenty of debates about this already, but I'll respond anyways.Where does it say that in the bible? I mean, I've read in the bible that you are supposed to stone all men who have sex with other men, and you haven't been doing that. I guess you're a pretty bad Christian. I can't remember the last time I saw some Christians stone gay people.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Neither the "bible", nor any other religious text has any business determining public policy in a free and secular nation, such as the Untied States of America.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

I'm against listening about the issue. Gay marriage, gay rights, gay pride. How I wish they'd go and do whatever it is they get up to and shut to hell up. What a beautiful word ''gay'' used to be until it was ''appropriated'' by the homosexual brigade. The word 'Gay' used to conjure up so many beautiful images of carefree cheerfulness, almost a sort of childlike merriment. For the average normal person the current meaning of the word doesn't bear thinking about. No reasonable person has any prejudice against those of a deviant sexual orientation but all normal people I know are sick and tired of been bombarded with the inferiority complex driven squawking of homosexuals and lesbians as they try to assert their abnormal sexual preferences on the rest of society.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

This really is the least I would expect from someone from Northern Ireland. You are asserting your sexual preferences on us by saying we can't get married.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

What is it about these mutant, deviant members of our population known as homosexuals? Why do they incessantly seek acceptance of their condition by normal people, most of whom, including me, couldn't give a chicken noodle what they do,''as long as they don't frighten the horses''. If they want to get married, that's fine, let them go and get married, and if that will shut them up, it will have my blessing and the approval of most of the normal population. They look for an anti homosexual agenda where none exists. They ask, ''do you approve of homosexual marriage''? ''Yes''is the reply. The homos continue, ''are you sure''? ''are you not a homophobic''? ''No, I've no issues with those of a deviant sexuality and feel that they have a right to get married, or even commit bigamy, as I really couldn't give a festering turd what they do''. Ah, ha, they cry, you're a liar, you find us disgusting and are prejudiced against us nice chaps, come on admit it!. Once again, I must stress I have no objection to you lot whatsoever, as long as you stay away from me, okay? So, get married/divorced, or whatever, but once again shut to frig up' just go and do it, quietly and happily like normal folk.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Marriage is between a man and a woman. If some perverts want to live together, I couldn't care less. Just leave the institution of marriage alone.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Perverts you say? What makes these Humans perverts?This is an issue making sly comments as such is undiplomatic, there is nothing perverted about 2 people devoting their lives to each other. Would you like to know why? Simple, there is no difference in a "straight" couple getting married versus a "homosexual" couple getting married both are professing love for their mates. People tend to focus on factors that SHOULD NOT matter in the situation, if these two humans are happy then let them live a blissful life without being stripped of their confidence and humanity.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Is it possible to make an argument that is more unreasonable than what you just said? What makes people perverts just because they're gay or lesbian? You can't help it if you are.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Not for it, If the gay community just used the term civil union instead of marriage, there wouldn't be this uproar about it.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Separate but equal is not equal. There is no reason they should have to use the term civil unions. There is no compelling interest for the state to create a distinction purely for the sake of distinction, and there is no way in which them having access to the same civil contract will have any effect on your life at all.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Right. "Will you civil union me" is so romantic. NOT! Gays have the right to get married too. If hetero couples have the right to get married, gay couples do too. The antigay concept is a religious idea that should NOT dictate the law. It is wrong to tell people what to do. What consenting adults do in their bedrooms is none of your business. We hold these truths to be self evident that all people are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

There is no law that say's that one person of the same sex must use certain words when making a proposal. As you said "What consenting adults do in their bedrooms is none of your business"I agree and what goes on in there personal life all together applies. It would have been wiser for the gay community to use the term civil union. A certificate of civil union would be a legal document that covers all tax laws and would not conflict with the Church. Our tax laws allow people to claim anyone as a dependent with that, they can place the dependent on their insurance policy. That is what the gay community is complaining about and they have an argument. I think the gay community is going a little too far by forcing others to change other peoples personal beliefs.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

A certificate of civil union would be a legal document that covers all tax laws and would not conflict with the Church.Wouldn't we need to create the legal framework for this? Just calling it a civil union doesn't actually mean that civil unions are recognized.A certificate of civil union would be a legal document that covers all tax laws and would not conflict with the Church. Our tax laws allow people to claim anyone as a dependent with that, they can place the dependent on their insurance policy. That is what the gay community is complaining about and they have an argument.They also aren't allowed in to hospitals like family would. The civil union paperwork you are describing doesn't seem to answer that.I think the gay community is going a little too far by forcing others to change other peoples personal beliefs.No, the gay community asking for rights granted by the government shouldn't be affecting personal beliefs at all. People go too far when they say that they need to change their personal beliefs in order for the government to grant rights. That doesn't make sense.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Creating the legal frame work would so difficult, at least I think so.Isn't a marriage certificate a legal document too?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Creating the legal frame work would so difficult, at least I think so.I was asking to see if you thought there was a legal framework already in place that the gays would just use instead of complaining.Isn't a marriage certificate a legal document too?Yes, but you don't believe the gays should use that method.Aren't you advocating that gays should use a legal framework that doesn't exist meaning they have to fight for that legal framework to be created. You are like Marie Antoinette "Let them eat cake"
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

It would have been wiser for the gay community to use the term civil union.There is absolutely no reason for them to do so. Marriage itself is a a civil union and, as I have told you before, separate but equal is inherently unequal. The church has absolutely nothing to do with this secular civil contract, and to claim that people are trying to force you to change your beliefs by allowing them to marry each other does not make sense. This has no effect on you. At all. You don't need to support them getting married, or think it is okay. But they have civil and constitutional rights that are being denied when you try to prevent them from getting married.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Not trying to force me to change my beliefs?I believe marriage is a institution between a man and a woman
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Cool. If gays are allowed to marry you can still believe marriage is between a man and a woman. You don't have to believe that the married gays are a legitimate couple for the government to recognize them.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Well, your belief would become wrong, but making gay marriage legal would not inherently change your beliefs.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Then you can continue to believe that while homosexuals get married. Please tell me how homosexuals getting married forces you to change your beliefs?I believe that every citizen deserves their civil and constitutional rights. The fact that people like you exist and have successfully prevented that from happening doesn't force me to change my belief.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

The fact that people like you exist and have successfully prevented that from happening?Im violating others people's Constitutional rights by believing that marriage is between man and a woman?Sorry, Two people of the same sex? that's civil union, Marriage is between a man and a woman. It's people like you that deny me my Constitutional rights.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

No no, simply believing that does not violate anyone's Constitutional right. You are of course entirely entitled to your beliefs. But when people such as you attempt (and often succeed) in pushing those opinions into law, then you are violating their Constitutional rights.Sorry, Two people of the same sex? that's civil unionNo. As I have said, there is no compelling interest for the state to create an institution purely for the purposes of distinction, especially when said distinction is itself inherently discriminatory and in violation of the Equal Protections Clause (and generally, by nature of implementation, the Due Process Clause).Marriage is between a man and a woman.To you, maybe. But that is a personal belief, not some objective fact. To others, it is between two consenting adults. What authority do you have to force others to adhere to your opinion? It's people like you that deny me my Constitutional rights.Please list which Constitutional rights I have denied or attempt to deny you.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Does the legalization of gay marriage include legalization of gay divorce? Oh yeah, I forgot that we live in a perfect country.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not. Do you have a problem with gay divorce?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

I can't. Does that mean that I hate them or find them disgusting? No. I have gay friends. I can still love them as fellow human beings.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I'm not going to let a Republican "MAN" tell me what to do with MY vagina.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

I'm not going to let a Republican "MAN" tell me what to do with MY vagina.First of all, why make it sound so sexist? Second, no one is telling you what to do with your vagina. Abortion murders fetuses, so that's why the prolife movement wants to abolish it.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Even though your username is "Jacobcoolguy"...----------------
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

You have a vagina? Post some pics. We deserve to see.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Neither am I....................................................................................
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Whom says any politicians can tell you what to do with your body. Talking points fed to you by the politicians that you believe should control the masses.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

The republican man is not telling you what to do with your virgina. He is informing you what you are doing with your mouth. You are openly admitting to a crime in pubic this is clearly done with your mouth and brain not your virgina. What the republican man is wondering is why all woman must be forced to make an admission to a crime by law.The Republic united states of Female Specific Amputation is the republican man telling all woman they do not in fact have to make the admission you are demanding from all of us. Then don’t let the republic. Go to jail. Officially stop admitting to the crime. Take a chance at trial. That’s the prochoice and prolife option. It clearly was not the republics choice as the united states republic serves the United States Constitution.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

The question raised with Pregnancy abortion is about truth or lie. Is pregnancy abortion a lie? Why this question is important is Pregnancy abortion is self-incriminating. It is always admitting a crime publicly that may not exist. First you must be able to say, Pregnancy Abortion is not an admission of guilt to any crime it describes, in any way. Do not confuse this idea with the basic principle innocence’s of the crime admitted, is the use of the word abortion in relationship to pregnancy admitting a crime publicly? My answer is yes it is admitting a crime. Why my answer is yes, abortion is stating a person is officially ending something that has been documented as officially starting. Human life. This makes abortion an assumption of control, on basic principle a woman never has complete control of her own pregnancy. As a united states they are asking for something beyond the law of nature without question.Do all woman need to admit to the crime of officially stopping life? Again as a united State the words Female Specific Amputation say no. All woman do not need to admit publicly to the act of officially ending life.Does this mean abortions cannot be proven? No it does not. A Female Specific Amputation can be proven when addressed in the proper way to be a pregnancy abortion. It also can be proven only when properly questioned not to be pregnancy abortion. This is a united states which is impartial.Woman have already proven to the public and other woman they are willing to murder children of their own posterity. A lie on official documents is not the same crime as the willingness to end officially life. They should not be treated as such as this again is a test to United States Constitution. Why the United States Constitution has been sacrificed as the blame of injustice in this matter is. All life which is brought to an intentional end was expected to go before a judicial constitutional separation to insure that all people in the public could not be trapped as accessories to murder. As this crime negates the right of Vote upon conviction.So again the most important question is. Do the words Pregnancy abortion create an admission to a crime? If no why not? It is not due to the question of when life starts, abortion describes a start is understood so the word is not telling the facts that are being described. This is a type of lie. As for the augment of rape. It may be advisable by law a woman should not take responsibility of the official end of life in this matter. As the basic principle of wrong may be left open to argue it is the person convicted of sexual assault who should take this responsibility. Again the Constitutional argument is based on the embryo a woman holds dies by law of nature every month. So it is reasonable within her powers to insure the law of nature is seen through, or not. This United States Constitutional debate should not be hindered by the improper use of admission to crime.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Haha hilarious cool guy. 1 point for you.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

In the very beginning of pregnancy there is no question about it.As long as it's not self-aware it's absolutely the parent's choice.The more interesting question is at what point in the pregnancy does it become inappropriate?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Inconvenient fact: Self-concept does not develop until well after the time of birth.Conclusion: At no point in the pregnancy does it become inappropriate, as at no point is it self-aware.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Since humans have become a scourge on the earth and the population is extremely out of sustainable existence:We need to be as REDUCE HUMANS any way possible!Semetic religion criminally brainwashes people to think man is more important than the rest of nature. Semitic religion is an enemy of Mother Nature
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Semitic religion is an enemy of Mother NatureHello Nazi:Well, you can try to wipe us out again.. But, you FAILED miserably last time you tried, and you'll FAIL again... What we should RID ourselves of, is fucking Nazis like you..excon
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Slavedevice isn't a Nazi. Nazism died out in the 1940s.-----
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Hello the, I am loathe to call someone a Nazi who hasn’t already identified himself as a Nazi, and this fucking Nazi has. A little research could have revealed that to you. His posts are archived here, after all. excon
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Then you're both incorrect, as Nazism died out in the 1940s like I said previously.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

No it didn't, your POTUS is keeping it alive.....................................................................
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

No it didn't,There's only a few of them left all alive today, but the National Socialist German Workers' Party doesn't exist anymore. The nazis surrendered in 1945, so that was the end of their reign.your POTUS is keeping it alive..................................................................... Actually, the president has nothing to do with nazis, so I don't know where you're getting this from. If you have a source, I'll read it.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

He's your POTUS as well, considering you're also an American. Also, Trump isn't a Nazi and isn't keeping the ideology alive. Nazism died in the 1940s, so I believe you're referencing neo-Nazism.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

It’s better for a small number of people to live a high quality life than for a huge number to live half miserableAnd it’s true - Judeao/ Xtian don’t have a plan for the earth. They don’t give a shit about the rest in future
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I am prochoice. I am pro do whatever you want with your body. A fetus is not a baby until it has brainwaves. This is how you know if someone is alive and a complete sentient person.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Where does God tell you the time frame an unborn baby is ok to kill? You call yourself a Christian and could not care less what God says about unborn babies he knows in the womb.You put your own selfish pro choice beliefs over God. Who do you think you are kidding?Ok, now spew your same old extreme case excuses while you support the choice to kill any unborn baby up to it supposedly has brainwaves. LOL, what a phony!
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

The United States Constitutional argument rebuttal states. Prove a pregnancy abortion it is not a person’s admission to a crime. There is an international game of obstruction of justice being played using an admission of guilt publicly.The ability to brag has clouded common sense of many people. Pregnancy abortion is and admission to officially ending life. The legality of any admissions to a crime has consequence outside the type admission itself. The nature states that the embryo dies every month during a woman’s natural process of menstruation is not GOD, but close enough to make a constitutional argument of precedent.There are a great deal of woman who may have actual not understood the United States Constitution. By this laps in ability made an error in judgement and called a Female Specific Amputation a Pregnancy Abortion.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Hello John, Come on now. You don’t really talk that way in your regular life, do you?? I haven’t a clue what you said.excon