azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Humans against a sexuality are creating division,and division is wrong. Jesus went around gathering humans to him,and not repelling anyone, but humans taking Christs name are repelling,and dividing,and that is taking Christs name in vain.Matthew 12:30 :King James BibleHe that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad That means those that are against the gay,and whatever sexuality including zoosexuality is a scatterer being not of God but of the devil, but that can change in whoever repenting to become a gatherer, and not a scatterer.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Homosexuals have the right to love whoever they want to, and others should not stop them being happy. I believe that you cannot help the way you are born and that if you believe in God then he surely must have made people that way.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You came to that conclusion based on your assumption that homosexuality is not choice but nature/genetical. If homosexuality was a choice, God would not have "made them that way" (and I believe He didn't make them that way) therefore we would not be pointing our fingers at Him and blaming Him for our sins so that we may wipe our consciences clean. Something that I dislike very much is that many Christians (and of course non-believers too) judge homosexuals yet the Christians themselves lie, steal and corrupt the churches regularly which, in my eyes is far worse than what homosexuals 'do' in the night hours. For the record, I believe homosexuality to be a choice.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Okay, if you can't change your sexual oreintation, then how do people CHOSE to be gay? Being gay is not a choice. It's something that just happens. Was being straight a choice for you?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

Is homosexuality wrong?By all means, NO.Why is it wrong?(discarded question :D)What gives religions the right to take away the freedom from homosexuals?Nothing that I know of.Why are people so ignorant to think it is a choice?Well, it may be a choice to some. I know at least one girl who chose to try it and liked it. She never had feelings for girls before this. She came to me saying "wtf, i actualy enjoyed it!". She's bisexual now and she seems to take some pride in it. :DBut I still believe most homosexuals must have it in them, as a natural thing such as liking pasta or hating caviar. Whatever is their preference, I don't see anything wrong with it.Why?Because.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

Is homosexuality wrong?NoWhy is it Right?Its not about being a right or a wrong...its just this person likes someone of the same sex...and I'm totally cool with it...why should I even think of judging something like that.What gives religions the right to take away the freedom from homosexuals?None but religion does it anyways because Religion is good at that taking away freedoms..Why are people so ignorant to think it is a choice?Its not a choice but people want to believe that everyone thinks and feels the same which obviously is not true. To say being homosexual is a choice then you might as well say being Heterosexual is a choice. Honestly I think anyone on the opposing side is completely ignorant. why is homosexuality any different then heterosexuality...how would you feel if you where deemed unnatural just because your someone who likes the opposite sex. For people to ostracize others for sexuality, gender or race or skin color is completely retarded.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I believe you are who you are and so you have the ability to like who you like and fuck who you wanto fuck. i am no gay but i believe if it was the the other way round straight people would not feel that it was bad to f people of the opposite sex!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

The fact is, we don't know if God is against homosexuality or not.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

It is rather subjective to choose. But, people better understand that there are a hell lot more issues that need to be liked or disliked and spoken against rather than something so Harmless. Everything important is ignored.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

When the scriptures where written it was a sin to do a lot more things which are commonly accepted today. Religions tallk of a lot of better things that need better attention than things that forbid a man to man or a girl to girl relationship.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I'm not personally Gay. Just believe in letting people do what they want.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Keeping away from the other topics that deal with homosexuality that have sprouted up from this debate, I would say for it. I personally am not homosexual though I do have friends who are homosexual and I see nothing wrong with it. Love is love, whether between two men, two women, one man and one woman or different. It is still love whether it be romantically or sexually.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Is homosexuality wrong?: No.Why is it wrong?: It's not.What gives religions the right to take away the freedom from homosexuals?: Nothing does. Separation of Church and State does not allow that.Why are people so ignorant to think it is a choice?: Close-minded attitudes.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

For those who's not homosexual, there is a freedom of choice whether to think of homosexuality as right or wrong. but for those whose nature is limited to have sexual feelings to the same sex, the decision is already made without asking them. this is unfair. they did not ask for that, i am sure, but what can you do? it is the way you were born. so when the frist stage of fighting with theirselves is done, there is a fight with nature, with society, religion. why should some people deal with it, and the others, those who is not accepting that, judge and ban it? if we say about the nature and religion, come on, we do not know if nature really banned same sex relationships, personally i think nature is about live without pretending. so if you are a real homesexual , then so be it. religion? here i am confused. i mean religion correlates with equity between humanity, understanding. so why cannot people be happy the way they really are? then again, love is not about what type of person are you, wherre are you from, and what do you look like, but for purity of the feeling.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

The only reason why homosexuality is wrong is that it doesn't produce a baby. Procreation is overrated.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

THERE IS NOTHING WRONG ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY. Marriage is not purely a 'spiritual' thing nor does it really have to be. I really despair with people who hide behind Bibles and say that it is wrong because a homosexual relationship produces no children. If they love each other then shouldn't that be enough?! For hundreds of years it was seen as a disease, an 'abomination', 'the worst thing that could happen to anyone'. So let's stop being so medieval about it. Some people are gay.GET OVER IT.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Religion can't, and does not, take away gay freedom. Name one gay freedom taken away by religion ;)
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

to all the people saying marriage is a religious thing ATHEISTS GET MARRIED. Marriage is between two consenting adults as is sex and relationships. Please mind your own business. May I just point that all these people asking for gays to be persecuted are the same ones who want the government to get out of out lives.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

People just think that it is wrong because it is different than what they are used to.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

The bible says one puny little sentence about homosexuality and that's it. Jesus never once says anything about it EVER. Dont believe me? Look it up. The bible may say homosexuality is a sin but you know what else it says? That people should have slaves, that if someone raped your daughter to make them pay you and go off unpunished, that divorce is a sin. Also why did God make a g-spot in man's ass? huh? to have sex with another man. Now for all the non-Christian fucktards who are homophobic. Homosexuality IS natural. Animals can be gay. It's scientifically proven. If you say ERMAGERHD BUT YOU CAN GET STDS FROM GAY PEOPLE -_- straight people can get stds too you fucktard.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Nothing is good or bad but thinking makes it so. Homosexuality is O.K.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I know for a fact that as a human, anyone has the right to love whatever gender\sex they want to, and if the Bible can't change their discrimination then Its official god does NOT love all
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

So someone has to agree with you, to love, you? That is NOT love, that is a dictatorship!.......................................................
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I know for a fact anyone can love however they what, and if the Bible says that's wrong then god does NOT really love all
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

i beleive it is wrong. But it is our human right to have freedom. Freedom to choose who we want to be and how we spend our valuable time. Nobody can tell you not to be something and you have to listen. You dont have to. You can choose. Thats the beauty if being a human being. THats what makes us unique.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

i beleive it is wrong. But it is our human right to have freedom. Why do you believe it is wrong? Can you justify it as more than a belief?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

well according to the word of God it is considered a sin. I beleive in the word of God. Second, it does not serve any purpose. When a man and women has sex it has the potential to result in a baby. When a man and a man has sex it results in absolutely nothing. Well except aides. It is disgusting to be honest with you. Also it is hard for men to establish relationships with other men who are gay.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

it does not serve any purpose.I could provide a very long list of things that are probably part of your daily life and do not serve in the slightest to aid the process of procreation. When a man and women has sex it has the potential to result in a baby. Rarely. There is also a variety of other heterosexual acts that have zero potential to result in fertilization. When a man and a man has sex it results in absolutely nothing. Except all the other benefits of sex such as bonding, stress relief, and immune system boosts. Exactly like the vast majority of heterosexual sex. Well except aides.I hope you do not actually think only homosexuals are capable of contracting AIDS because that would be moronic. It is disgusting to be honest with you. I think you are disgusting but I would never support any hypothetical restriction on your right to marry another similarly disgusting person if you wanted.Also it is hard for men to establish relationships with other men who are gay.Do you mean it is hard for straight men to be friends with a gay man, or it is hard for gay men to maintain a relationship?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

i am being honest with you and you give me grief? lol. I hope you do not actually think only homosexuals are capable of contracting AIDS because that would be moronic  Well i can see how my statment would imply that. Thats not what i mean. What I really mean is the benefits of gay sex MAY result in disease and does not result in life. Sex between a man and women MAY result in disease as well and can be equally protected as well as gay sex, BUT MAY result in life. There is a huge difference between the two. Potential of having a baby or 0 potential of having a baby.  Except all the other benefits of sex such as bonding, stress relief, and immune system boosts. Exactly like the vast majority of heterosexual sex.  Wow. You do understand that one of the most important aspects of a relationship beween man and women are children? Right? Thats one of the big flaws of a homosexual relationship. You cant have children together. That is one of the important aspects of marriage. Building a family.  Do you mean it is hard for straight men to be friends with a gay man, or it is hard for gay men to maintain a relationship?  It is hard for straight guys to be friends with gay men. Its not the same. I can be close to my friends one on one. GO to their homes sleep in the same room do whatever we want. Tell me have you ever talked to any strait guy having that kind of close relationship with a gay guy. I seriously doubt it.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Well i can see how my statment would imply that. Thats not what i mean. What I really mean is the benefits of gay sex MAY result in disease and does not result in life. Sex between a man and women MAY result in disease as well and can be equally protected as well as gay sex, BUT MAY result in life. There is a huge difference between the two. Potential of having a baby or 0 potential of having a baby. A man having sex with a woman who is not ovulating or about to ovulate has the exact same likelihood of creating a baby as two men having sex: zero. And women are only ovulating a small percent of the time, making conception unlikely even without the use of contraceptives. This means that if you think the possibility of conception is the only thing that makes sex acceptable or normal or whatever, then most heterosexual sex does not meet that definition either. Keep in mind heterosexuals also regularly engage in oral and anal sex.Most people do not have sex because it has a small chance of making a baby; in fact, they are counting on it not happening. They have sex because it's fun. And that's fine.Wow. You do understand that one of the most important aspects of a relationship beween man and women are children? Right? Thats one of the big flaws of a homosexual relationship. You cant have children together. That is one of the important aspects of marriage. Building a family. Who says? Who says that's the most important part of everyone's relationship? Who says the ability to create biological children together is the deciding factor in the ability to marry? Who says that the 'flaw' of being unable to create children together is grounds on which to bar a couple from officiating their relationship? By the way, this logic would bar elderly, infertile, and childfree couples from getting married, too. Which would be ridiculous - because having children is not considered a requirement for marriage.  Also, homosexual couples can raise children via adoption, surrogacy, or IVF. Just like a lot of heterosexual couples. It is hard for straight guys to be friends with gay men. Its not the same. I can be close to my friends one on one. GO to their homes sleep in the same room do whatever we want. Tell me have you ever talked to any strait guy having that kind of close relationship with a gay guy. I seriously doubt it.I live in an apartment with my boyfriend, who is a straight man, and our roommate, who is a gay man. Somehow, they have continually managed to treat each other like human beings who deserve equal rights. It's hard to understand, I know, but some people don't define themselves or others solely by their orientation. Also, restricting the rights of homosexuals has no effect on the existence of homosexuality, which is what you appear to be complaining about in this last paragraph.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Well I have nothing more to say. Ill just finish by saying that I do beleive Homosexuals deserve equal rights and should be treated equally but not in marriage. This is not something I debate on. What I am debating on is that it is moraly wrong. And it seams like your ignoring alot of what i say and exagerrating what I say as well. For example i said one of the most important aspects of marriage. And you say that I said the most important aspect of marriage. :/  I do respect all people. This is no debatable. I just dont want gay marriage to be established in this country. It challenges the very foundation of marriage, in my opinion. It encourages our children to explorer their sexuality. Before you know it Gay marriage will be tapped into our childrens books. That is quite disturbing. That is how I feel. You dont have to agree with what I am saying.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Ill just finish by saying that I do beleive Homosexuals deserve equal rights and should be treated equally but not in marriage. As marriage is a civil right, and you do not think homosexuals deserve it, you have just said "I believe homosexuals deserve equal rights except they do not deserve equal rights."What I am debating on is that it is moraly wrong.That's great. Don't think your morals are important enough on their own to be made into legislature. And it seams like your ignoring alot of what i say and exagerrating what I say as well. For example i said one of the most important aspects of marriage. And you say that I said the most important aspect of marriage. :/ You appear to be saying that the ability to make children is the factor that should decide whether or not a certain relationship should be legally recognized in marriage. By doing this, you make that the most important factor. It encourages our children to explorer their sexuality. I think the fact that you portray this as a negative thing explains a lot about why you think what you think. Before you know it Gay marriage will be tapped into our childrens books. And? That is how I feel. You dont have to agree with what I am saying.I don't agree with you, which is why I am posting a counterargument...this is what this site is for, not just saying what you think and not defending it. You are allowed to dislike homosexuality all you want, that's not what I care about. But you should not be allowed to let your discomfort or religious prejudice prevent a demographic of citizens from being treated equally. That is what is happening, and that's what I care about.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Arent morals one of the most important factors in the world? And yet you say they are insignificant. Tell me do you think the constitution of the united states of american completely ignored morals? Are we machines, or are we human beings? I have every right as an American citizen to be apart of deciding what the foundation of marriage is founded upon. I beleive this threatens our moral environment. And yes morals are extremely important.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I am talking about your morals, specifically, and how they should be insignificant when deciding how homosexuals are treated. Homosexuality is not a crime, it doesn't hurt anyone, and there are plenty of people who don't consider it immoral at all. So, if you want to deny civil equality to an entire segment of the United States population, you are going to need something better than the fact that homosexuality grosses you out and God doesn't like it. Allowing the majority to oppress the minority just because they agree on it is dangerous, and there is no reason religion should get to dictate the terms of marriage in this country.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Have you ever heard a christian say God/jesus lives in me? What does this mean to you? It means Being a christian and beleiving in God and his word is a priority in our lives not a side dish of the main meal. Homosexuals should not be persecuted because that would mean we would have to persecute ourselves. We all are under persecution, and we are free from that once we submit ourselves to Jesus christ. What Im getting at is that we are all sinners as a whole. I detest people Saying that God hates fags because this is not even close to being true. It is so far off the charts, because Jesus didnt come to judge the world but to save it. We are all to love one another. God detests homosexuality. Homosexuality itself he detests according to biblical terms. It just sadens him to see his children fall into this sin, just as he is sad to see his children commit other sins, which are too many to count. In conclusion we are all on the same boat that is going full spead into a cliff. We can choose to stay on the boat, or we can do what God has been urging us the whole time every step of the way. Get off the boat! Hurry! I love you too much just call my name and ill pick you up and take you to a safe place, where i will be your shelter and protection. Do you think I have the right to judge someone whos on the same boat I am? And do you think for a moment the ones who were saved are going to judge those who are on the boat? NO! They are already saved! They will risk their lives to save their lost sisters and brothers. This is how the real christian life should be lived. So do you think I want the best for people? Do you think I want people to smoke? NO. But can I stop them. Defenitely not. Will I repect their rights if they choose to do it? Yes of course. You will say isnt homosexual marriage the same thing? And I would say God would not want this for our country. So then I am against it. Will I persecute anyone for it? Absolutely not. Will I say it is wrong? Absolutely. If I do not say this is wrong, then i cannot say smoking is wrong, I cannot say overdouse on alchol is wrong, I cannot say lying is wrong, I cannot say swearing us wrong. Do you see where Im getting at? I Have placed my trust in the hands of Love. This is where I will be.