azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

In your other comments, you clearly state the dominance depends on the field. I guess your claim only works if you ignore the fields for which women are dominant over men.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

Would you like it if all you did was stay at home and look after babies and your husband and cook and clean and sew? It's okay if you WANT to do that. What it NOT OKAY is if men force women to do that. I am a feminist and I cannot imagine myself doing that all day. It would get pretty boring. Women are just as talented as men (if not more) and we deserve to do whatever we want. What pisses me off the most is that you men take everything for granted. If it wasn't for us women, there would be no such things as human beings to start with. You wouldn't be here if it wasn't for your mom, grandma, great-grandma and so on. Guys are just too chicken to go through that pain. You should be thankful right now, not saying that man are dominant. WHICH IS NOT TRUE ANYWAY!! I would honestly be ashamed if I was your mom/sister/cousin/auntie/grandma and so on.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

women more talented than men lol!! men do not force women to do that guys are not chicken at all we fight in wars. yeah men are dominant and by the way it takes a an to get a women pregnet you idiotic fu*king moron GUYS RULE AND GIRLS DROOL
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

Were not living in the 1950's. Girls don't stay at home and cook, an feed, and sew. (sewing, really?) And it's not all one gender that is responsible for producing human life, it takes both genders. I really hope you don't need to have how babies are made explained to you... So please, don't even try doing that whole grandma thing, wow you you should be so grateful.... you wouldn't be here without... stop.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

How come girls do so much better than boys at school? All that many men can think about is sex. That is not such a hindrance for women.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

girls do beter because SOME teachers are sexist and men dont think about sex girls try and suduce men into having sex so shut up
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

I am quite dumbfounded by the amount of gross misrepresentations regarding my writing. Not once have I stated that men are more intelligent. I said we have bigger brains- an anatomical fact; if this continues then I will just ban the next person who intentionally misrepresents my writings to push their own agenda.Actually read what I say and not what you want me to say, I was careful in my writings to not make any false, or contentious assertions. Intelligence can be manifested in differently in certain fields with one gender being dominant in a specific field, for example, women may be more intelligent with childcare, whereas men may be more intelligent with strategic planning (like hunting, or attacking an enemy village, for example).
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

Hey, stay dumbfounded there Harvard, that's what you're good at, and sure, you've nothing better to do with your time at any rate. As a break from your pompous drivel why don't you try yodeling up the canyon. or some other such activity more commensurate with your arrested intellect. Yes sirree Bob, being dumbfounded and yodeling up the canyon is just you all over. Bye for Now-now-now-now-now.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

This could be a clever smear if you understood what "dumbfounded" meant, and didn't continue your remark premised on falsehoods. You seem to think it implies ignorance, which, if you actually understood fundamental English, Englishman, you would've have known this:Dumbfound- greatly astonish or amaze.Essentially, all you just said was "stay amazed, that's what you're good at [...]-" which, in a sense, is true because I do love to remain amazed, its what keeps me going in life; if things weren't amazing life would be greatly boring...
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

Hi again there again Harvard, ( what a pretentious name) Howzitgoin? Must point out that not only are you wrong but you're wrong at the top of your ''voice'', metaphorically speaking. You see old bean, you should never submit a retort when emotionally charged. The adjective, dumbfounded can be used in place of a host of words including, bewildered, bamboozled, overwhelmed, confused and so forth. Place all these appropriate words in a big pot, stir well, make some alphabet soup, pour all over the floor and the jumbled ''staughy'' would be a good description of you.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

Must point out that not only are you wrong but you're wrong at the top of your ''voice'', metaphorically speaking. The adjective, dumbfounded can be used in place of a host of words including, bewildered, bamboozled, overwhelmed, confused and so forth.This would be intelligible and sensible if I used [dumbfounded] in such a context that implied confused. I used it in the literal sense, amazed.  This almost-clever smear would have been successful if you were a mind reader and knew the context posed. I used it in the literal sense, amazed. Though, you may keep trying (though I should warn you that you are digging yourself a deeper intellectual hole).Secondly, you seem to think that you have effected my emotions in a significant way...? I don't know why you CD users seem to believe that you somehow frustrate people to large degrees with such fatuous and inane remarks that are reflexive of your intelligence.Perhaps you say something and feel good thinking you have done that of which was intended (to frustrate), but such feelings derives from false conceptions. Why would anyone be angry in virtual discourse especially when the one (believing) he is doing the frustrating sounds completely foolish.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

The word amazed means surprised. At some point shouldn't you figure out how things work and stop being surprised at everything?
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

You are directly relating amaze to ignorance which doesn't always have to be the case. One can be amazed with a though every time such thought comes to mind. I am amazed every time I visit the north and see an aurora.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

I agree it isn't always the case. I meant specifically to point out that you were surprised by normal things that happen in life. That is ignorance.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

Was the strawman really necessary (you misrepresented my argument by adding in the term "surprise" to falsely substantiate your point on ignorance)? Where have I said that I am "surprised" by "normal" things?Furthermore, you are issuing a false dichotomy. Amazement doesn't entail ignorance, whether it be 'normal' things or otherwise; it is a description of ones reaction to something; for example, an astronomer may look at nebulae, and galaxies and be amazed even though such galaxies are perfectly normal to him as it is apart of his daily life.Moreover, normalcy (in this context) is entirely subjective, one thing being normal to you may be different to me. One astronomer may look at nebulae, and galaxies and be amazed; another may look at a supernova and be amazed all of which are entirely normal in the context of [an astronomers] life.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

adding in the term "surprise"You used a word that means surprised. Look it up. . Amazement doesn't entail ignorance, whether it be 'normal' things or otherwise; The first time that you are amazed by a microwave making something hot is not ignorance. Being amazed at the 100th time that a microwave makes your food hot is just ignorance.  and be amazedHe should only be amazed when something new shows up, by definition. entirely subjectiveFine, it is normal to everyone but you.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

You used a word that means surprised. Look it up.It also means "to be filled with astonishment-" to which can mean "to be impressed-" which means "feeling of admiration or respect-" to which the context regarding my amazement for things (not specified) would logically follow.The first time that you are amazed by a microwave making something hot is not ignorance. Being amazed at the 100th time that a microwave makes your food hot is just ignorance.Cartman, you keep building your arguments on misrepresentations. I simply said "I do love to remain amazed, its what keeps me going in life-" to attribute microwaves making your food hot to my simple statement, which didn't even specify on things that amazes me, is being grossly uncharitable.And again, I did not specify the ways in which I love to remain amazed.He should only be amazed when something new shows up, by definition.Amaze includes impress, in which one can consistently be impressed. And again, I did not specify the ways in which I love to remain amazed. I could have easily meant that I am amazed at things that are incomprehensible, or inconceivable, etc.--As an aside: Let's assume that I did mean "surprised," this doesn't have to be negatively connoted. As you say "and figure it out" as if 'figuring it out' is what should follow with 'being surprised'- one can be surprised that they, in fact, figured something out, as I am sure Newton was with his many significant discoveries. --The biggest misrepresentation you've made was including the term "normal". You claim I am always amazed at normal things in life, when I simply said "I love to remain amazed". My amazement could be derived from complex, abnormal phenomena- you came to the conclusion that my amazement derived from normalcy, which isn't true.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

It also means "to be filled with astonishment-" to which can mean "to be impressed-" which means "feeling of admiration or respect-" to which the context regarding my amazement for things (not specified) would logically follow.I can't find any dictionary that says astonishment means impressed. Could you provide which dictionary you are using so that I can update my vocabulary?to attribute microwaves making your food hot to my simple statementYou provided an example of amazement, and I provided another. That is all.And again, I did not specify the ways in which I love to remain amazed.You didn't specify which ones you love, but you specified some that you do remain amazed on.I could have easily meant that I am amazed at things that are incomprehensible, or inconceivable, etc.Incomprehensible for you does not mean incomprehensible for all.Let's assume that I did mean "surprised," this doesn't have to be negatively connoted.True, unless it is like the microwave example. As you say "and figure it out" as if 'figuring it out' is what should follow with 'being surprised'- one can be surprised that they, in fact, figured something out, as I am sure Newton was with his many significant discoveries.Comparing Newton not figuring out gravity right away and you not being able to figure out why women don't want to be subservient is hilarious.The biggest misrepresentation you've made was including the term "normal". I apologize. When I said normal, I meant something you would find admirable in a man that you find undesirable in a woman.You claim I am always amazed at normal things in life, when I simply said "I love to remain amazed".No, I said that when you tried to change what everyone means when the say dumbfounded.My amazement could be derived from complex, abnormal phenomena- you came to the conclusion that my amazement derived from normalcy, which isn't true.This debate is not about complex abnormal phenomena.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

A) If it was irrelevant vis-à-vis dominance, why mention it?B) you specifically say that it is more than a trivial fact, but that it does have relevance: "BIGGER than a female brain, which is significant in terms of psychology" - psychology includes intelligence.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/brain-size2.htm
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

How is that a response to my post?....You - I'm dumbfounded that people think I meant intelligenceMe - here's whyYou - check out this article on the relationship between brain size and intelligence...Still dumbfounded???
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

it talks about more than just intelligence, it explains the difference in terms of functionality between male and female brain size differential.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

How does people believing "more than just intelligence" includes intelligence justify your stupor?
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

one gender being dominant in a specific fieldSo, your position is that sometimes men are dominant on average and sometimes women are dominant on average?Then your post belongs on the other side.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

I am quite dumbfounded by the amount of gross misrepresentations regarding my writing. Not once have I stated that men are more intelligent. I said we have bigger brains- an anatomical fact; if this continues then I will just ban the next person who intentionally misrepresents my writings to push their own agenda.Okay so why is men having bigger brains relevant? That those that are more top heavy are naturally the more dominant ones?
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

That is a self evident truth which doesn't require elaborate literary embellishment. Almost everything in the modern world from the computer your using, electricity, the telephone, television, the radio, the automobile, the aeroplane, penicillin and so forth were all invented/discovered by man. The list of the male's inventive genius and pioneering ingenuity is endless. Woman's role in society has expanded as a result of political correctness and not due to their suitability for the roles to which they have aspired.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

the computer your[sic] usingWomen WERE computers!The first program ever written for an electronic computer was written by women.ref
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

Though, they did not invent the actual computer- they invented a program... woohoo!To say "Women were comp!" is a bit of a of exaggeration. Their program is irrelevant if their was no medium through which to propagate.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

they did not invent the actual computerThey made it work - including programming and debugging it.One of those women (Admiral Grace Hopper) also invented the first compiler and oversaw the team that created COBOL refthey invented a program... woohooUm, try using your computer without running any programs...To say "Women were comp!" is a bit of a of exaggeration.Actually, it is not one bit exaggeration - before "computer" was a machine, it was a job - one that many women held.
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

This site is called Create Debate, not, 'Take the Bait''. To where did my last riposte vanish?
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are Not

Click the "Show Replies" under the argument you responded to. (Presumably the one by Harvard that begins "This could be a clever smear...")Or, click "Show All Replies" near the top left(both probably require JavaScript)
Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

What about the gender imbalances favoring women in some occupational fields? The fact that more women teachers are hired than men? or nurses? Most modern feminists go on and on about higher male employment and how it's unfair for women not to receive equal opportunity. If you identify as a feminist who wants everything to be equal for both genders, you have to look at both sides, and examples of women dominance as well. Besides, working to create equal numbers of men and women hired for a particular job is ridiculous. What happened to being hired because of your work ethic and/or knowledge in the field of work? If I were in an employer's position, I would hire based on these characteristics, rather than hire equal amounts of each gender so that I can keep feminists at bay. If you want an example, take firemen. Because men are anatomically built stronger than women, it would make sense that more of them are hired for the job that could potentially involve carrying a person out of a burning building in order to save their life. Or would you rather have dead or injured people instead of more women in the field of work?Another thing that feminists complain about is rape and sexualization of women. Can we really blame men for having testosterone levels sometimes up to 20 times higher than a woman's? They might seem hornier.. because they have more of the hormone that fuels sex drive. In the past feminism was very important, I don't deny that. But now that so much has been achieved- equal women's rights and all that jazz- what's the point? What are modern feminists trying to do? How can you make everything equal for men and women when there is a pre-established hierarchy that favors men when it comes to strength and dominance? I don't understand feminists either, but if you identify as one, here are some things you can do that will actually make sense:1. Blame mother nature (or God, or evolution, or whatever it is you hold responsible for the structure of humans) for making men physically stronger and with higher testosterone levels. 2. Encourage employers to hire based on gender, not on the morals of the worker, or how qualified they are for the job3. If you are a female feminist, go around and rape some guys. If the difference in statistics bother you, that's the only way you're going to be able to fix it.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

If I survive long enough for it to get to me I'd be stupid not to. This is a totally different vaccine from those previous, entirely different technology. THAT is why it was developed so fast, nothing to do with "warp speed"!There are some villains in China, there are also some heroes. Chinese scientists, within days, solved the genetic code of the virus and put it on the internet. Drug companies immediately started work WEEKS before Trump decided it might be a good idea to get his name on the process. He really didn't give a DAMN about the people he lied to, just their VOTES! Then he refused to buy millions of doses he COULD HAVE RESERVED, so, now many more can go to other countries. Not that they don't deserve them, THEY had leaders who saw the writing on the wall! Trump had trouble reading it. ID ten T!
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Yes, of course, but I'm not going to cut in line for it like certain entitled politicians.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Yes I will because I am in always contact with many students. I think it is the most socially-minded thing to do.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Yes. Most definitely.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Vaccines for the win!
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

You don't have to add characters to reach the max limit. Just add a ton of space in between words.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Like this.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Oh wow thanks, it works.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

You don't have to add characters to reach the max limit. Just add a ton of space in between words.I always wondered how that was done. I suspected it had something to do with using the mobile version, so looks like I was completely on the wrong track.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

I always wondered how that was done. I suspected it had something to do with using the mobile version, so looks like I was completely on the wrong track.It took you this long to figure out something I discovered 3 years ago even though you've been using this site longer than me because you are less intelligent than me.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

bruh moment
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

It's a shame. Dr. Trump, Dr. Jesus, .... neither know crap about viruses OR vaccines!Listen to Dr.'s that DO! It's good for your health.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Dr. Jesus, loves you, and was crucified for both of us...........................................................................................
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

So the story goes. Once upon a time a little girl and her dog were sucked up by a tornado and landed in a land of witches and flying monkeys. So the story goes.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

Hell no! I’ll wait for all you get vaccinated and wait to see if you become zombies. Then I will get it
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

I'll make sure I will eat you if I become a zombie. haha
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

Haha!! How strangely arousing! I’ll be sure to have my baseball bat
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

You took it too far, bucko.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

If you're a zombie I'll be sure to not go near your neighborhood you'll probably get all your neighbors to get the vaccine too.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

Haha I apologize for making you uncomfortable then. It was not my intention
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

I wouldn't get a vaccine that's less than 10 years old. These things take testing over time they can have a lot of data now, but there's still a lot of stuff scientist can't predict. Plus I don't feel safe with the government making choices about my body.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Certainly. I’m sane

I wouldn't get a vaccine that's less than 10 years old.Then if you or any of your family die from Covid it will be your own fault. I'm not sure I could cope with knowing that my own ignorance had cost my loved ones their lives.These things take testing over time they can have a lot of data now, but there's still a lot of stuff scientist can't predict.And on the other side of that argument is a killer disease which is highly contagious and ripping through the world population like wildfire. I guess it comes down to whether your priority is distrusting vaccines or living.Plus I don't feel safe with the government making choices about my body.Ah yes, I knew that was coming. Never mind that the government is offering you that choice of course. The vaccine isn't mandatory. We must still always put distrust of government first. Jolly good.
Debate: I’m gonna get vaccinated. You?
Side: Hell no. I’m not insane

1: How am I harming my family if they're all vaccinated? This only affects me.2: I'm not afraid of Covid survival rate in my age group is 99.9973: The government is still administering it and since there are many folks like you, they don't have to make it mandatory.Good luck getting the vaccine, Cheers!