azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Let me start with this:By now you should know he is HolyBy now you should realize I don't believe in god so no verse in your book is going to be the best answer for anything.He is bound by no law. So to describe him as immoral doesn't make sense.He existed before the law.Every action he takes becomes law.By your words then rape, slavery and genocide (including the death of infants) are moral acts. After all, "every action he takes becomes law."The format of the evidence cannot be presented here.Most convenient, but without evidence there's no reason to believe. Why not believe in unicorns or the flying spaghetti monster?The whole world was already going to hell after until christ came. He sent christ.Not true, that's why people were responsible for their own sacrifice. However, if you're suggesting it didn't matter and they were heading to hell, this means god offered no way to save those that lived prior to Jesus. Another reason he is immoral and unworthy of worship.Archaelogy and history proves the existence of christ.There may be evidence of a man named Jesus existing, but this does not prove any supernatural powers. He could have been nothing more than another heretic.God abandoned man in the first placeThe same god of unconditional love abandoned his creation? You're not helping your case of him being worthy worship.Then why is it that even today you still would go to heaven for breaking his rules.You misunderstood me. I'm not referring to the rules he gave us to follow, but that he sent himself to die because of his own rule requiring a sacrifice to be made.You'd call the cops.Invalid.You can't simply assert this being invalid with no reason.You don't understand holiness do youNeither does your godTry ignoring a contaminated chemical preparation(solution) and go ahead to use it.God - being all powerful - could simply remove the contamination. Also, this seems like an odd comparison. If you were working with this same contaminated solution, your response would be to kill yourself? Seems a bit extreme.Says who.Those archaeologists you mentioned earlierWhat is the error?God makes man and woman and they failGod floods earth to wipe the wickedness from the earth.God starts again, but this time with people already afflicted with the curse of sin (because if it didn't work right with perfect people, of course you'd try by starting the second time with sinful people, right?).Again, things didn't go to plan but this time destroys individual cities that are wickedStill doesn't work so after a couple thousand years sends himself to commit suicide on behalf of all mankind.-The claim of "error" is twofold. First, as shown above, god seems quite inept at getting his creation to work properly. Second, to piggyback off your robot example; if you knew your robot would start Skynet, not only would be it be irresponsible to continue with it's creation, but also pointless.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Oh, hell no!!!

Jeffrey you told me to go look at all the great arguments you make and all the up votes you get ? This latest attempt by you is an example I take it of your ' powerful ' debating style ?It's extremely amusing the butt kicking you're taking I almost feel sorry for you ...... easy now I said ....... almost
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Jeffreyfirst time you ever spelt it right.... i wonder how long it took you to learn how to spell yours...probably grade 8...i won't be shockedyou told me to go look at all the great arguments you make and all the up votes you get ? the adjective you chipped in very exaggerating and on my side extremely annoying.no body is a fool here Dermot. you're cunning, everyone sees it. to hell with youIt's extremely amusing the butt kicking you're taking I almost feel sorry for youhuh?
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Oh, hell no!!!

Well now you're just making stuff up what a surprise , still upset because you don't have a school in your village ?Still no up votes ?Too embarrassed to talk about your latest butt kicking on CD ?
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Oh, hell no!!!

I think i will ignore you now............................................................bb
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

By telling me you're .......................ignoring me 🙀
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

You're ;)
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Oh, hell no!!!

Last question..... your ;)
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Thank you ........................................................
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Oh, hell no!!!

It seems you’re lost in this conversation and now you’re just trying to talk your way out of it.First of all, i admit i deviated once with a line(your fault)On the other hand, you have deviated seven times, where i was supposed cancel out such questions, but i stupidly played along thinking it will get better but still the same.After i have answered a question which leaves no room for anymore(about it), you somehow manage to generate a senseless question from the already answered and blend it with an unrelated(extreme deviation) issue and you put it forward as a new question.The fact that one asks plenty questions doesn't mean they are sensible. The focus is to produce water, which is H2O..........But all of a sudden i see H2 +O +K(potassium/unrelated)= ??(it doesn't make sense considering the fact that we intend to produce just water)That is how you've been playing your game, you have been insisting senseless questions......And i managed to answer according to unrelated blending......then you again remind me like "i thought we were producing water?".........Whenever i am approached with a question, the size of the content reduces in less than 48hrs......gradually and it finanlly diminishes.....but with you it's the opposite, it keeps enlarging because you keep deviating and blending with the unrelated.It seems you're a bigot who doesn't want to accept H2+O produces water but for a reason (i insist which you deny) we will spend eternity in the lab......After all you're not the smartest person i have spoken to recently,Just last week i had similar encounters from three people and the conversation was dissolved amicably(which i rarely do but i gave them a chance) in just two days.  I constantly alerted them on their deviations but with you, i condoned...........I try to make sense outta ya senseless(deviations & unrelated blends) questions.I have lost interest already.....But if you insist, start from the beginning where i will scrutinize and omit your deviations and bring some sense in your questioning...cos as far as i know no water has been produced.....
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Just last week i had similar encounters from three people and the conversation was dissolved amicably(which i rarely do but i gave them a chance) in just two days.I constantly alerted them on their deviations Whether I'm one of the three or there were three additional people is unclear, but if you had issues with each of us, it would seem you are the one that just doesn't get it.After i have answered a question which leaves no room for anymore(about it)Only if we agree on your answer would there be no more room. If I ask what 2+2 is and you answer red, there's more discussion to be had.The focus is to produce water, which is H2O..........But all of a sudden i see H2 +O +K(potassium/unrelated)= ??(it doesn't make sense considering the fact that we intend to produce just water)...It seems you're a bigot who doesn't want to accept H2+O produces waterSince you use the word, "bigot", I can only assume you're trying to use this as an odd analogy for human reproduction; and though I do accept H2+O produces water, these aren't the only uses for hydrogen or oxygen, which it seems you believe to be the case. I'm also not following what potassium is supposed to represent since whether you identify as any of the LGBTQ+ community, at it's core we are still starting off as men and women with no suggestion of a 3rd option.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Whether I'm one of the three or there were three additional people is unclear, but if you had issues with each of us, it would seem you are the one that just doesn't get it.Poor comprehension.If something was dissolved, it means there was a final agreement.Plus you 4, i started with them about the same time as i did with you.....i was done with them 5days ago......but here you are still....If I ask what 2+2 is and you answer red, there's more discussion to be had.There have been no such instance...at least not my side....It's more like 2+2 when i say 4 and you're like "oops , + 0.456, so your answer is wrong".....these aren't the only uses for hydrogen or oxygen, which it seems you believe to be the case.This is where you lose focus.You just admitted it.As long as the focus or motive is to produce water, any other uses of hydrogen or oxygen doesn't exist ........stay focused.....I take it as you didn't take my suggestion so this is officially over.....Unless you have a better offer such as a life time job.....then i would tolerate your inconsistencies, lack of focus and deviations.....at least the pay compensates the headache...
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

i was done with them 5days ago......but here you are still....It's only because you take so long to respondThere have been no such instance...at least not my side....There have been many instances on my side that I don't agree with your answersThis is where you lose focus.You just admitted it.As long as the focus or motive is to produce water, any other uses of hydrogen or oxygen doesn't exist ........stay focused.....I'm certainly not the one that lost focus. I perfectly understand that if your presumption of "the focus or motive is to produce water" is correct, then the LGBT community shouldn't exist; but you are wrong in your presumption.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

http://dailyguideafrica.com/waterfall-disaster-warning-ignored-prophet-gyebi/ http://dailyguideafrica.com/tree-kill-20-students-kintampo/ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OEGy1wK6z0w https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QzRj3FsYkohttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OKQk1eOE5Zo The last link, though the pastor really did it, he is not of God
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Oh boy, a list of irrelevant articles and videos. Yay.http://dailyguideafrica.com/waterfall-disaster-warning-ignored-prophet-gyebi/http://dailyguideafrica.com/tree-kill-20-students-kintampo/So let me get this straight. This self proclaimed prophet predicted all of the children on a trip to Kintampo (a popular place for tourism with several attractions) would die, and gave no specific time frame or location. He also added to his "prediction" that if they were to proceed with the trip, they should change their route and avoid the Kintampo road. If that's the case, this would imply the children would be killed on their way to or from the waterfall, not actually at the waterfall. Also, not all of the children died, only some. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OEGy1wK6z0wWhat's the point of this?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QzRj3FsYko Convenient covering of the actual event. You actually believe this crap? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OKQk1eOE5Zo Not English so I have no idea what's going on. I didn't watch all 34 minutes of it, but did skip around and nothing happened. What's the point?-You accuse me of losing focus and then paste some random links which have nothing to do with the topic of this debate, nor each other.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

well, he never said everyone will die ,did he?Actually he did. Look elsewhere and you can find english transcriptions of it and he does specifically state all the children would die. He also did not specify a time or date, he simply stated a school class is planning a trip and they need to cancel it otherwise they would die AND if they were to proceed with it, to at least avoid the specific road, implying it wasn't the waterfall that was the peril.18 Lives is worthless to you?You were expecting about 50 people before he warned?I never suggested this and how dare you suggest otherwise. My point is I don't believe in prophecy and this guy is nothing more than a con artist.What am trying to prove is God exists, and he warns.This isn't proof of anything.It isn't material logic and proves the existence of impossibilities that questions your stand as an atheist(someone who doesn't believe in the existence of such things).This video isn't proof of anything. Why should I even believe this video to be authentic?Because scammers are usually school drop outs who are not supposed to be intelligent than their victims who are mostly rich business men, professors and intellects....So if this video was a scam it just goes to show how gullible religious people can be.you should know by now that you always are hysterical, paranoid and complaining when you talk about GodOn the contrary, I greatly enjoy religious debates. Your most annoying questions are the ones about adam and eve.Its as if you never owned or borrowed a bible to even read it....You keep missing the point. I understand the answers from the Christian or Jewish perspective. My questions are worded as such because when you actually look at the text without the blinders of belief and faith, the stories are actually quite absurd.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

Actually he did. Look elsewhere and you can find english transcriptions of it and he does specifically state all the children would die. He also did not specify a time or date, he simply stated a school class is planning a trip and they need to cancel it otherwise they would die AND if they were to proceed with it, to at least avoid the specific road, implying it wasn't the waterfall that was the peril.Are you trying to translate my own native language to me?Did you hear what he said on radio before the event?I never suggested this and how dare you suggest otherwise. My point is I don't believe in prophecy and this guy is nothing more than a con artist.So then what do you mean by he said all will die but not all died? He shouldn't have cautioned because it was 18?You don't believe in prophecies but there are a few more of irrefutable ones i add.....Like a prophet at the beginning of the year prophesied a lot of youth's suicides and other deaths....Just between february 25 and March 18, 3 students of three different universities(here) commited suicide, plus another at home with her mum.I have links....Just not necessary.This isn't proof of anything.Then derive the formula for his calculation.This video isn't proof of anything. Why should I even believe this video to be authentic?You can take a flight to the church to see more.So if this video was a scam it just goes to show how gullible religious people can be.I don't know how you understood it but from this i can tell how poor your comprehension skill is.On the contrary, I greatly enjoy religious debates.There is zero sense of delight in your words.My questions are worded as such because when you actually look at the text without the blinders of belief and faith, the stories are actually quite absurd.But at least it should go in line with the original story right?.....You always bring your own new story on board.........Which i know nothing of...so annoying.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

So then what do you mean by he said all will die but not all died? He shouldn't have cautioned because it was 18?I don't give a crap if he said anything or not. I'm simply saying he's a con artist and good con artists know how to get lucky. As I stated before, in his "prophecy" he said if the school were to still take the trip to at least avoid the main Kintampo road. Again, his claim was that tragedy would happen on the road, and a quick Google search shows just how common accidents occur in that particular area making the chances of such a tragedy quite likely.Like a prophet at the beginning of the year prophesied a lot of youth's suicides and other deaths....I don't know about where you are, but teen suicide and other deaths are not exactly uncommon here. In fact we average about 121 suicides each day in the US. Unless his "prophecy" indicates a specific person who dies at a specific date & time by a specific method, there's nothing special about it.Then derive the formula for his calculation.What calculation? He makes a "prediction" that is just vague enough to have a good chance of coming true. That's how all of these con artists work, but there's no mathematical formula for it.You can take a flight to the church to see more.Nope, don't need to. People are just as easily fooled in person as they are from video. I don't know how you understood it but from this i can tell how poor your comprehension skill is.You claim the video wasn't true which just goes to show how gullible people can be. There is zero sense of delight in your words.How can you sense anything from just words but no tone? Besides that, it isn't up for debate since you can't argue it.But at least it should go in line with the original story right?.....You always bring your own new story on board.........What other story did I bring on board?
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

As I stated before, in his "prophecy" he said if the school were to still take the trip to at least avoid the main Kintampo road. Again, his claim was that tragedy would happen on the road, and a quick Google search shows just how common accidents occur in that particular area making the chances of such a tragedy quite likely.Ah what nonsense are you saying?That accidents regularly happen on that road says who?Even so, did he talk about a waterfall or road. And about this you still challenge me about my language on what he said. What nonsense?You are not an atheist, you work for satan.I don't know about where you are, but teen suicide and other deaths are not exactly uncommon hereYou are not in my country and you can't tell me what is not rare or is here.What calculation? He makes a "prediction" that is just vague enough to have a good chance of coming true. That's how all of these con artists work, but there's no mathematical formula for it.By this you imply they are the most intelligent people in the world.NASA, or weather forecasters calculate before they predict.But why would they give the credit to God?Nope, don't need to. People are just as easily fooled in person as they are from video.People like you?You claim the video wasn't true which just goes to show how gullible people can be.Ah.....how many times should i say that was for just demonstration?Its like an experiment How can you sense anything from just words but no tone? Besides that, it isn't up for debate since you can't argue it.It is coming from your brain.Psychology.
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

That accidents regularly happen on that road says who?Here's an article that was found among others by doing a quick searchhttp://www.gbcghana.com/1.8693124Even so, did he talk about a waterfall or roadBothAnd about this you still challenge me about my language on what he said. What nonsense?Not my fault you don't understand itYou are not an atheist, you work for satan.Nope, I don't believe satan existsYou are not in my country and you can't tell me what is not rare or is here.Didn't read the entire sentence? "not exactly uncommon here"By this you imply they are the most intelligent people in the world.NASA, or weather forecasters calculate before they predict.I have no idea how you got there, but no. Yes, NASA and meteorologists predict based off actual calculations whereas the con artist in your video made a guess.People like you?Seriously? If that were true we wouldn't even be discussing this and I'd be on your side of this superstitious nonsense.Ah.....how many times should i say that was for just demonstration?So a pointless, waste of time...thanksIt is coming from your brain.Psychology.Where's your PhD? Besides, you believe in a man in the sky and you want to try to explain psychology?
Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

That accidents regularly happen on that road says who?Here's an article that was found among others by doing a quick searchhttp://www.gbcghana.com/1.8693124Even so, did he talk about a waterfall or roadBothAnd about this you still challenge me about my language on what he said. What nonsense?Not my fault you don't understand it. Also, even if this were true (which it's not), he should be held liable for not making the effort to actually tell anybody who could actually do something about it instead of making some claim on a late night radio show.You are not an atheist, you work for satan.Nope, I don't believe satan existsYou are not in my country and you can't tell me what is not rare or is here.Didn't read the entire sentence? "not exactly uncommon here"By this you imply they are the most intelligent people in the world.NASA, or weather forecasters calculate before they predict.I have no idea how you got there, but no. Yes, NASA and meteorologists predict based off actual calculations whereas the con artist in your video made a guess.People like you?Seriously? If that were true we wouldn't even be discussing this and I'd be on your side of this superstitious nonsense.Ah.....how many times should i say that was for just demonstration?So a pointless, waste of time...thanksIt is coming from your brain.Psychology.Where's your PhD? Besides, you believe in a man in the sky and you want to try to explain psychology? --Gotta admit, with the bizarre tangents you keep taking I'm getting bored of this