Debate: Does God exist?
Side: Atheism

Nobody will ever never be able to give physical proof that God exist; and nobody will ever be able to give such a proof that God goes not exist due to fact that if God created universe he has to be an outside force which we can not experience since we can not get out of material universe. What we can do is use our logic and reason to proof if our reasoning about religion and God is logically stable and correct. There are at least two levels to consider when reasoning about the God and religion. The obvious and easier questions when it comes to discussion about God and religion are about particular religions that humanity have come up with during the history. here we can argue about the claims that different religions have come up such as Buddhas or Jesus existence, mythical events like Noah or Moses escape from Egypt, Mohamed's rise to heaven, and so on. I think that to this level belongs even discussion about relation between religions and reasons why there are different religions in the world and why religions come and disappeared during the history.On this level I wonder why would God wait about 200 000 years before he revealed himself to humans. If one is to believe archeology, humans have existed on earth in form of homo sapience for about 200 000 years. Christianity has been on Earth for about 2000 years, and Islam even shorter than this. Judaism have been somewhat longer, yet it is still just a small fraction of human history during which we are to know the God. We also know for sure that before Judaism there have been other religions such as those of Egyptians, Greeks or Romans. Even before that people have cherished other Gods, which in modern religions is one of biggest sins. Why would God wait for so many thousands years, and allow people to pray to other Gods when it seems such a big deal for him that people praise only Him? It is a contradiction.If we tackle question from the biblical point and accept that God created Adam & Eve, how come than that those other religions and ancient gods came to be and why he didn't act in time than. Same apply to fact that other religions exist in different parts of the world. I am thinking about Buddhism, Hinduism, and south-American cultures of Mayas, Incas and Aztecs. According to Judaism, Christianity and Islam it is one of biggest sins to praise other Gods than one that is popularized by those religions. It just does not make sense to believe that either of those three is correct in its claims.On second, more meta-level there is discussion about necessity of a creator and religion at all. Here belongs questions like "why does universe exist" or "how it become". While I believe we can reason about question on both levels, the first one is obviously easier and second one will include more subjective beliefs. My own standpoint is that we don't need God to explain those questions. It might appear to be handy to have God as an explanation to some existential questions, but it really is not more handy than to have nothing at all. Using God as explanation, as a creator or cause to explain why universe exist is a trivial solution. It just is not satisfactory to a reasonable being to accept such trivial explanations that a higher "non understandable" power has created universe with higher goals in mind which we can't understand or know about but have to accept exist.But do we really need a creator of a universe? I believe that answer on this question depends on how egoistic as a person one gets. Human beings seems to have need of importance, of being part of something bigger than themselves. Partly it is true, we are all part of nature; but there has to be nothing special in that fact. There is not much more significance in fact that we are part of a nature, as it is in fact that stones, sand, world seas, or a trees in a forest, or Moon or any other particle is also a part of universe. If we can accept that universe just exist, without special purpose or reason, and that world, and life, and finally we as a specie has simply developed because of certain physical laws, that certain answers would be actually possible to answer and world might be a better place. If one really think about it, having a God as an ultimate creator of universe is actually just shifting the problem one step further. If anything that exists has to have a creator, than who created a God. If God does not need a reason to exist, than there is no difference to say that universe does not need a reason (creator) to exist. Those two claims are equivalent and question is which one can accept as an axiom from which to derive the rest of reasoning.I dare to claim that world would be much better place if we can realize that God is totally unnecessary step in that process since it adds nothing of substance to the universe. Why would world be a better place without a God belongs to another debate :).