azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

We have the bible.....................................................................
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

and I have all books about Harry Potter
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

True. Kavari should have said "we have no viable alternative".
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

The bible talks about how you can heal a skin disease with a dead birds blood...
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

But it (Evolution)isn't a fact;it had a lot of missing links!
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Many of the so-called 'missing links' have been found.Consider, for a moment, that fossilization is generally the exception, rather than the rule. Most creatures that die are completely devoured by other organisms, even the bones eventually succumbing and turning to dust. Particular conditions must be present to preserve the structure of the bone long enough for fossilization to occur. These conditions are not found everywhere.Not just that, but we've only searched a tiny portion of our world for fossils. From these, it is reasonable to infer that the majority of extinct species have not been discovered in fossil form yet.Despite the facts that only a tiny fraction of dead organisms fossilize, and we've only looked for fossils in a tiny fraction of the earths crust, we've still managed to uncover enough fossils to demonstrate a clear progression, including most of the previously touted missing links.The fossil record alone, as it stands, is already a very strong argument for evolution, and we haven't even touched on other supporting information, such as phylogenetics, or the fact that we've actually witnessed the genome of species changing in response to selective pressure in a lab.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

We still need an alternative. Plus, what missing links are you even talking about?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Only moron would pick Magic :D
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Evolution actually gives us a more understandable way of how everything was made. It actually explains to us and makes a lot of sense. Why do you think Humans look and act so much like other Primates, evolution tells us that. Why does Primates along with Marsupials have thumbs, Evolution gives us a clear answer to that. The bibble just tells us lies. It tell us how we're supposed to live our own lives. Plus Evolution was proven, and there's fossils to prove it. There's barely even any clues given in this "Bibble"!
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Evolution means getting better and go on beyond every day. Doesn't matter how the world began.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It is simple.We have evidence for it. Thus we are inclined to accept it.The other side has no evidence. Their only tool is to ridicule Evolution or cite pseudoscience for that matter. Nothing short of idiocy and is simply unacceptable.Good day.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

No reason not to. It's pretty much proven. We can't see it with our own eyes, like snow, or colors, but we can observe it's affect on generations of quicker aging species. A virus doesn't become airborne because God wanted it to kill more people, it evolves. A Bird with a short beak doesn't have children with long beaks because God decided not to punish the next generation making them starve, they do because of natural selection and evolution.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Only a fool wouldn't with the evidence we have to back it up. It can't be proven 100% but it is the only logical explanation and it has evidence so it is the obvious thing to believe.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

The bible is a logical explanation.......................................
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

The bible is a logical explanation Especially that part about human made from mud his wife from his rib ..followed by talking snake offering magical fruits... yeah fucktard.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Especially that part about human made from mud his wife from his rib ..followed by talking snake offering magical fruits... yeah fucktard.It was actually in the King James Version dust and Christians don't believe the fruit was magic just that God told them not to eat it. Also the snake was Satan.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It was actually in the King James Version dust and Christians don't believe the fruit was magic just that God told them not to eat it. Also the snake was Satan. the fruit of knowledge.. not magical ... there is no word about talking snake being actually a devilish wizard...
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It was nice of you all to upvote me again after that trolling multi accounter downvoted me down into the negatives.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Someone isn't playing fair.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Someone fears the realization that they are wrong so much that they feel they will accomplish something by downvoting the winning arguments, and upvoting the losing ones. It's almost funny.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Seems almost like a minor parallel to the Catholic churches suppression of science hundreds of years ago.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

How many alt accounts does it take to do this much down/up voting? WOW! Someone needs a life. Cough! Jc cough!
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Or Prod. Maybe JC is Prod. .
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

You guys are missing the real point. Christianity is a young religion. It's only 2000 years old. There has been many religions before that. Different gods, different ways the world was made. Too many concepts and Gods.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

and here we have it again, mentally fucked creationist creates new accounts just to support their delusion...
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

C.mon people it is like asking "Do you accept gravity?" or "Do you accept oxygen"?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Of course
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

Read genesis again...................................................................
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It was proven. There's a lot of evidence proving that Evoution is fact. Simple Evolution is in Nature when a Tadpole Evolves into a frog. Also compare Humans To Chimps.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

I've got a question for you..... If evolution is true and we evolved from apes why are there still apes?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

If American came from British, why we still have British ?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

We didn't come from apes. We just share a common ancestor. Apes went one way and we went the other.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

your an idiot...we have a common ancestor the same as dogs with wolves.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Because multiple apes evolved before we came. They were already there when us Humans and Chimps arrived.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

Because multiple apes evolved before we came. They were already there when us Humans and Chimps arrived.They are just regular apes
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Dude, you have no knowledge of your real,origins man. Let me ask you we're you raised Christian?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

There's too much of evidence of the Big Bang. Plus evolution was actually proven.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

There's too much of evidence of the Big Bang.So what? That doesn't have to do with evolution. Note: I have to do this to you because I have done it to all the Theists.Plus evolution was actually proven.Not exactly, but about as close as can be.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

There is clear evidence of progression of living things, all animals, plants, fungi and bacteria. Irrefutable evidence of this is the growing problem of pathogenic diseases that can be treated by antibiotics becoming resistant to antibiotics. How are they becoming resistant? EVOLUTION. There is no other plausible explanation. The one evidence that seems to contradict this is the bible. However, the bible refers to times 8,000 years before the earliest dated piece of inscribed writing. If it wasn't a work of fiction, it was a giant game of Chinese whispers. This is incredibly weak evidence and cannot be supported by any solid proof. Therefore, evolution is true.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Of course: it is backed by scientific evidence, and many decades of research.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

You don't have to except evolution, it will happen weather you like it or not, the fact is you have a chance to except evolution.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

I accept evolution, but I believe that God created this thing we call life and creationism. I do not believe that we came from plant-like animals with no eyes or sense of smell, but I do believe that some things have changed a little bit since creation.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

yes i really accept the evolution. Because as we take our own life we cant born suddenly as a grown up individual, it would take a gradual time to transfer us from a child to a adult. in mean time we undergo many changes in our body as compared to before. So in the mean while evolution also occurred with out that we cant improve like as today. In other way there is direct proof was given in the Hindu literature like BHAGAVADGITA, MAHABHARATA, and BHAGAVATAM
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

I accept evolution as a theory only. I am still waiting for Science to prove it.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

You do know what a theory in science means right?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

No. Evolution gave me a 3 inch penis. And yes, that's with an erection.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

The Bible(Genesis 1:1) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. So,it means that the Bible doesn't suppport the evolution theory.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

How is that proof that the Bible doesn't support evolution?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

How is that proof that the Bible doesn't support evolution?Read it.....
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Well, I have read it... Actually, I have read a great deal of the Bible, but in no way does Genesis 1:1 conflict with the theory of evolution.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

Genesis 1:1 :In the beginning God created(1) the heavens and the earth.1.So,it IS the God who created the world,NOT the Bang(and evolution)!
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

A) The Bible doesn't say that God didn't do that by using the Big Bang.B) Creating the heavens and earth don't have anything to do with how living creatures change over time.NOT the Bang(and evolution)!You guys need to stop lumping these together.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

The Big Bang doesn't contradict God. Neither does evolution. I believe in both of those things as well as God.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

What the hell? When did you become theist?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It's a long story. I was an agnostic before, but I found something that made a lot of sense.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Yeah, I knew you were an agnostic. What, exactly, happened?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It's really difficult to explain to someone who hasn't experienced it, but the closest word I can come to is an enlightenment. Sounds crazy, but in a single moment it was like a puzzle put itself together in my head and my entire outlook changed. I realized that everything and everyone were a whole. A Self. So I looked some stuff up afterwards and found that not only does science agree, but about 90% of the people who have NDE's and come back say that they discovered that we're all one Self.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

So, pantheism, basically?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Kind of. I'm not going to put a name on it. I made an argument for another user that goes into more detail:  If you were to look at an oak tree, you would see what an acorn has become. They are not two separate things, but rather an oak tree is just a grown up acorn. And on that oak tree are leaves, twigs and more acorns. Those are not separate from the tree, but are part of the tree... They ARE the tree. Eventually acorns fall off and grow into oak trees themselves, giving us the illusion of separate trees... But if those acorns that are now oaks once belonged to a single oak tree, then they are still that one tree. It's like cutting a pizza into slices. You have different slices, but they are still the same pizza.Well, everything you see on this planet grew from this planet, just like acorns growing from a single tree. We as humans, grew from the combination of our father's sperm and our mother's egg. We ARE those things, and those are part of our parents. And everything in our universe came from a single point, the Big Bang, if you believe in that. That single point was the acorn from which everything in the universe came from.That creative force, whether it was from two atoms, God, whatever, is as much US, as an acorn is an oak tree. Everything in this universe is ONE. You see, we complain that there is no evidence of God... But as it turns out, if this theory is correct... Then we ARE God. Everything is God and we are everything. Religions have been saying this for thousands of years. Though, I would say that no religion is entirely correct, therefore there is no need to commit to a single one. So if you look up into the sky, you will see stars and planets that came from the exact same point that you did, the seed of creation. Those stars are not miles away from you, they simply are you... And so is everything else, because everything you see is just an oak that was once an acorn."Science and religion are two different languages telling the same story."I tried to explain the biological connection, but there is also another clear connection. If you were to look at your body through a microscope, you would see cells, and within those cells are atoms, and within those atoms is energy. Everything and everyone is made up of that same energy. That's also the energy that came from the Big Bang.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Meaningless new age shit that does not solves anything... .
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Did you actually read all of that? Wow, I'm impressed. Maybe next time you should actually try and refute my argument.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Yes I did read the whole blob of yours .
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

And you understood it?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Sadly I did .
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

LOL! No you didn't! You just proved that to me in another argument. Please, if you understand it, give me a brief summary of what I typed.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

As far as I know there is no religion what would include BBT and/or Evolution.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

I'm not religious, so...
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

then you are probably delusional .
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

What makes you any better than I am? My beliefs are based off of the same theories that yours are.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Do you know what is the difference between reality and poetry?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Man created from mud? Women from his rib ?Does that feel like Evolution ? :d
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

Well, Adam was created from dust, not mud... And both the theory of evolution and Judaism/Christianity agree that we came from the earth.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

Man created from mud? Women from his rib ?Does that feel like Evolution ? :dAgain the word is 'aphar which means in English the cloest to dry earth or dust.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

The Bible also doesn't support the earth being a sphere or revolving around the sun, what is your point?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

If you talks round the Bible,take a closer look of it and it had said the earth being a sphere and revolving around the sun in Psalm(I remember it is...)
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

It also speaks of how you should beat a servant if you think he has done wrong.and it also tells you about healing a leper with a dead birds blood....and the bible also speaks about two different stories for Jesus' birth which can be proven wrong.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Yes, bible does not supports Evolution but it supports flat Earth, genocide, slavery, talking animals....
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

The Bible also uses metaphors and includes talking animals as symbols (by the way, the serpent didn't become a snake until after he was punished), similar to that of Aesop's fables. People just interpret that stuff literally, so now we have delusional Christians, and delusional atheists who think they are making the Christians look stupid, even though they too have misinterpreted the Bible. It's the blind making fun of the blind for their blindness.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Where exactly bible stated that there are no talking animals where it said that it was metaphor ? Who need that like metaphor ?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Uhhh... What? Mind fixing that argument for an English speaker?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Uhhh... What? Mind fixing that argument for an English speaker? well, yes it was a bit crude reply. I was battling auto correction integrated in my cellphone and in combination with strange smell coming out from seat row behind me, I felt quite under pressure and realising that I am replying to some deluded stranger which implies that stone/bronze age mythology and poetry somehow could (metaphorically) be linked to the Evolution. Which with adding the magical word "metaphorically" could be said virtually about anything ever written..so I kind of gave up on proper reply.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Well, that is a pretty lousy excuse. I said that they agree that we came from the earth. I didn't say that they believe we continued to evolve.A lot of religious passages are metaphors. You saying, "No it's not!" is ignorant. Take it from someone who didn't believe in a god at the time he was studying religion in college. We know based on history that metaphors were often used to share stories in ancient times. Prove to me that they weren't.I also think it is incredibly daft of you to say that I am delusional when I actually believe in the same theories as you. It's whether or not intelligence was behind these is where we disagree.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Did you personally knew the author? Does it states somewhere that it is a metaphor. Most of bible are primitive tales divorced from reality. How do you want to distinct entire bullshit from metaphorical bullshit? "we do not "believe" in same things
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Did you personally knew the author? Does it states somewhere that it is a metaphor. Most of bible are primitive tales divorced from reality. How do you want to distinct entire bullshit from metaphorical bullshit?That is how they explained things back then. Not everything were metaphors, but a lot of them were. The Bible even mentions that Jesus spoke in parables... They are actually called the Parables of Jesus Christ. In case you don't know, parables are a type of analogy that teaches a moral lesson. They are like fables, except they don't include animals. What you would find in Old Testament are more along the lines of fables.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

...sorry but the ultimate wizard cound't do any better that give set of trivial myths to bronze age goat farmers? Jesus Christ is as real as Hercules.Parables of Jesus Christ No, no, no, this is just try of modern creatards to make bible look less retarded, saying that they are just "tales" that suppose to teach about "morals" Same as Old testaments bible never states anything about being metaphorical, It wasn't and is not understood that way. For vast majority of it's existence you would be executed for saying something like that.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

No, no, no, this is just try of modern creatards to make bible look less retarded, saying that they are just "tales" that suppose to teach about "morals" Same as Old testaments bible never states anything about being metaphorical, It wasn't and is not understood that way.Oh, good grief... Ignorance and arrogance are not a good combination. The Bible specifically says "parables".Ezekiel 20:49 "Then I said, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Does he not speak parables?"Matthew 13:3 "Then He spoke many things to them in parables, saying: “Behold, a sower went out to sow."Matthew 13:10 "And the disciples came and said to Him, “Why do You speak to them in parables?”Matthew 13:13 "Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand."Matthew 13:35 "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying: “I will open My mouth in parables; I will utter things kept secret from the foundation of the world.”
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Cherry picked 5 sentences out of context? Classics :D
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Are you trying to tell me that you don't know what the word parable means?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

You have cherry picked 5 sentences in translation that fits you. ..
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

45 The Lord spoke his word to me. He said, 46 “Son of man, turn to the south, preach against the south, and prophesy against the forest in the Negev. 47 Tell the forest in the Negev, ‘Listen to the word of the Lord. This is what the Almighty Lord says: I am about to set fire to you to destroy all your green trees and all your dry trees. The blazing fire will not be put out. It will burn the whole land from the south to the north. 48 Then everyone will know that I, the Lord, started the fire. It will never be put out.’”49 Then I said, “Oh no! Almighty Lord, no! The people already say that I’m only telling stories.”You are just another bible cunt that cuts stuff out of context. You cut out dialogues to make it look like bible is not meant to be an encyclopaedia.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

Are you really that stupid? Go back and reread. By the way, for the thousandth time, I am not a Christian. Why else would I be trying to reinterpret modern-Christian thought by arguing that Jesus is the reincarnation of Adam? Get an idea of who you're arguing with before you make ridiculous assumptions, or just fuck off.
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

You are just another fanatical cherry picking zealot thinking that I'm not going to check it out... ,
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

How does that disprove evolution, because a book says so?
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

Bible also refutes logic and common sense ...but enjoy :D
Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: Yes

1. The singularity was not nothing.2. The singularity was all of the universe, there was no vacumm because there was no space for matter to be absence in.3. The big bang is not an explosion, so no "ignition" needed4. It wasn't nothing...really research the singularitty5. Nothingness did not produce heat. The universe expanded in an initial release of pure energy and was light.6. I'm not even addressing this point due to this topic going over your head.The rest are ignorant ramblings with an elementary understanding of physics (Newtonian or otherwise) and so is Vance's book. I'm guessing you're a Christian? Guess what, so am I but you should look up some old-creationism articles.