azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

A) I love how it was religion that was women's outlets.B) Greeks are whites even though a lot of their philosophy was derived/similar to asian philosophy.C) Articles written by women obviously biasedly focusing on some inequalities. They never mention how men died in their millions so that women could live.last I checked everyone was different and all people are too be treated as equals.Last I checked paedophiles (etc. etc.) were not treated as equals either. You want gay rights.. you best give all these sick fucks rights.Call the gays civil partners then. Not married. Simples.I don't have to believe in God or follow religion to have the same arguments I have.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

A) I love how it was religion that was women's outletsFair enough I think that it was deemed that here is where they could do the least damage. Given that there is nothing they could say or do.B) Greeks are whites even though a lot of their philosophy was derived/similar to asian philosophy.What has this got to do with anything?C) Articles written by women obviously biasedly focusing on some inequalities. They never mention how men died in their millions so that women could live.And articles written bt men are bias towards women.Was it only for the sake of women that were wars fought for, not for land, freedom, religion, wealth, to protect everyone.last I checked everyone was different and all people are too be treated as equals.Glad to see you agree that homosexual people should be treated as equals.Last I checked paedophiles (etc. etc.) were not treated as equals either. You want gay rights.. you best give all these sick fucks rights.The treatment of paedophiles should have no bearing on this debate if you want to debate that I would advise setting up a debate on it. Giving rights to Gay people is not the same, paedophiles are sexual predators that destroy lives, Gay people are not and do not.Call the gays civil partners then. Not married. Simples.Why, because you say so, not going to happen, don't you live in England where the rights of same sex couples to get married are law, have fun trying to change that.I don't have to believe in God or follow religion to have the same arguments I have.No you do not, but it is you that brought religion into this debate.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

Naw fags can't get married in England.. they get civil partnerships or some shit like that. Still giving them too much.I've been tired of this long ago and can't be bothered to reply anymore. Here's my final say.You have no morals - because you're gay. Ok you may have some morals but not when it comes to this.Your ethics differ - because you think it's ok to be gay.There is no denying what I say about gays is true.They're feminine (in general)It's disgustingYou're not born gayIt's wrong.You're gay. And a paedophile.Anything else I can't remember and cna't be bothered to remember. End of story. Have fun watching 4year olds being raped by 60year olds.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

I've been tired of this long ago and can't be bothered to reply anymore.Then why bother now? If only to have the last say.You have no morals - because you're gay. OK you may have some morals but not when it comes to this.Mate I am not Gay and I do have morals especially when it comes to this. Just because I agree with that Gay people should be allowed to marry does not make me Gay, I am married to a women are you?Your ethics differ - because you think it's OK to be gayWell, if this isn't stating the obvious.It's disgustingThis is only to you.You're not born gayYes you are, it is quite a detailed answer but if you would like I could go in to it.It's wrong.To you, this does not make it undeniably true.You're gay. And a paedophile.No I am not, are you trying to insult me, because coming from you after your tirade of bullshit it is not even in the slightest bit annoying.Have fun watching 4year olds being raped by 60year olds.It takes a sick mind to come up with this sort of scenario you may need help.It is also quite telling of the validity of your arguement that you would drop so low to finish off.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

morals are completely opinionated, what may seem strang to you is normal to others."Lol you being serious?"not all religions condem gays"I need to come up with a new accurate word to describe you queers"how about right?
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

not all religions condem gaysWow that's a first.Well technically it's not a first but you get the idea.You're a retard.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

ahh so instead of coming with a intelligent rebuttal you just resort to name calling, well done. to name a few religions that don't condemn gays, Buddhists don't, some sects of Hinduism doesn't, Scientology doesn't, a lot of pagans don't, FSM doesn't, neither does tarvuism. you have to understand not everyone is as closed minded as you.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

FSM? Tarvuism? SCIENTOLOGY??They're not religions. Maybe tarvuism but who the fuck cares right?Buddhism and Hinduism condemn homosexuality. No illicit sex/sexual behaviour. End of.I woudn't mind taking a tolerant approach if they kept it in the background. Shagging in public mens toilets. Not on tv and cinema and public and schools and constantly in your face about how what they do is ok. They keep it hidden.. I keep my mouth shut.you have to understand not everyone is as closed minded as you.No I'm a man. That's the difference. You're liberals or kids. Until you dicksucks become men, you wouldn't understand this shit either.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

to me mate, all religions are just as silly as the last,cause you know, thats a great mentality to impose on peoplewhat your doing is wrong, your a abomination. this can lead to mental stress and denial, since homosexuality is not a choice (backed by a thing called science). and i didn't know "being a man" required the ability to completely shut off logical arguments and refuse to think that you could possibly be wrong.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

MAYBE being gay isn't a choice.But you don't have to live a homosexual lifestyle.But you're not born gay. Aslong as that remains true then maybe we can do something to cure the disease/sickness/disorder.No being a man is a lot of things but one of them is definately to be straight. There are extreme and I mean EXTREME and by that i mean EXTREME!! exceptions where a faggot can be considered a man... but in general the rulse stands.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

"maybe"? even though there is tones of scientific evidence that shows it isn't a choice, and that it isn't a disease/ sickness / disorder (watch the video that Atlanta Esq posted near the top) your going to go with "maybe". and when a very large majority of the scientific community say being gay isn't a choice, and back it up with their "silly" facts, their probably more right then you when your argument is piratically "cause I'm right"
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

Well IF science 'says' that your fate is decided at birth then I'm going to say it how it is.Bullshit.Science only points to an increase likelyhood of being gay. Never 100% definately going to be a cocksucker. A lot of the general 'science' is flawed and sometimes doesn't even give cause.Sexuality isn't predetermined at birth. Anybody who says so is just trying to give gays a free pass. We should start doing that with criminals. Ohh wait they are.....
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

so even tough there is tones of scientific evidence to back my theory's up, you calling BS on the grounds of "i don't agree so I'm going to ignore it without a shred of evidence to back me up"?
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

so even tough there is tones of scientific evidence to back my theory's upWhere are your links?I've already had tons of links posted to me several hundred times on this site and have disputed them all. Your just another faggot on the block who's trying to prove another point. Lay out YOUR evidence and I'll piss all over it. That's the drill.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

the video provided by Atlanta Esqhttp://current.com/143jm4cplease give me your evidence, I'm always looking for new ways to observe things. and do you always have to try to insult people to prove a lost point? its saddening really.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

differences are likely to have beenparameters likely toin a group of 90 volunteersJust a quick glance at 'the most compelling evidence' shows it's nothing really that stable.But atleast it shows they agree with me.Gays are basically women with cocks.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

ah, but still no evidence of your own, "Gays are basically women with cocks"ever heard of the sacred band of Thebes?
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

RETARD ALERT! EEERT! EEERT! EEERT! No, seriously, if your just that stupid then you need the dosage upped on your meds!brother and sister or brother and father or brother and mother or sister and father or sister and mother or sister and sister or brother and brother or paedophile and young person or dead body and necrophile or a dog and a bestiality person.well of coarse not, those are illegal, because of defects in child births, and animal cruelty laws. second, were not advocating that. third, we accept people who don't do things wrong, because MANY studies have proven that sexuality is proven before birth.fourth, calling people names just shows how unexcepting you RED NECKS are. see, we can be just as cruel. You really need to read your little bible. doesn't teach you to accept, forgive thou neighbor (even though the gays arent your neighbors, and never did anything to you)? Did your "Christ" not die for ALL of us?
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

A) I'm not ChristianB) I'm not WhiteC) I'm not from America.Awwww did all your judgements crumble in one blow?
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

"Blah blah blah anybody that isn't accepting of all types of peoples is a bigot. Have fun advocating paedophilia."Were talking about a relationship between two consenting adults not one adult and an underage kid that either has no idea that what their doing with the adult is wrong or is being forced to commit the act.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

As an Englishman, I believe I have the authority to declare that the defenition of the word marriage is 'The state of being married', or as a noun 'An act of lawful romantic union between two persons'.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

Well the fact that it's wrong to be gay in the first place......why would you want there to be marriage?You're acting very gay right now.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

Of course they should. Who am I or you, or any other person to say who can and can't be in love?
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

They can be in love without getting married. You haven't really made a point there. If you mean marriage, then who are you to say they should be able to do things. Your belief that they should is no more valid than someone else that says "Of course they shouldn't". It being self-evident to you is no better than it being self-evident to them.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

I can be in love without getting married, but I don't wanna. Why souldn't they want to as well?Who am I to say to let them do things???That dosen't make any sence. I believe no matter sex, skincolor and what sex you're into, shouldn't keep you from living just like anybody else.Its normal to get married.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

So you meet a guy, you like him, then.... you get married and hope love follows? Or you love first and then decide to marry? The first way sounds silly, maybe that's just me though. And the second one involves love without marriage.You seem to be assuming that every homosexual agrees with this point. Maybe they have good reasons and in fact do want to. You have no right to say what everyone else should want.Now you have provided a little justification, which I agree with.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

You seem to be assuming that every homosexual agrees with this pointI've never said that.The first thing you wrote just dosen't make sence. What does it matter how you felt in love? Everyone has the right to get married.Also, there are many many gay couple, who really wants to have children.But unmarried people don't get to adopt. And the gay's aren't allowed to get married. So their chance of having a child are small, if not impossible.Also, if they were allowed to get married and then adopt, then alot of children will get homes, its a win win situation, and I can't see why anyone loses at any point?Does it bother you seeing two men or women together?Does it bother anyone seing two men or women together?Im not saying ALL gays should get married. The ones who want to, they should do it.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

Okay, don't worry about that bit, it doesn't matter.You just saying you think they should have the right is the same as someone else saying they shouldn't have the right.Also, there are many many gay couple, who really wants to have children.But unmarried people don't get to adopt. And the gay's aren't allowed to get married. So their chance of having a child are small, if not impossible.Unmarried people can adopt, at least in the UK and US, but google tells me it makes the process a little easier, so that's a good point that I hadn't considered.Depends. Two men kissing is fine but I wouldn't really want to see them getting up to their private business. With women, I'd be quite happy to watch that all day. Even kissing does bother a lot of people though, and I see that as being their own fault. Unfortunately, the majority of voters seem to be in this category. And democracy is founded on the voters wishes.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

Unmarried people can adopt, at least in the UK and US, but google tells me it makes the process a little easier, so that's a good point that I hadn't considered.oh sorry, I wasn't aware of that.Where I come from you have to be married if you want to adopt, and you can't marry the same sex.Depends. Two men kissing is fine but I wouldn't really want to see them getting up to their private business. With women, I'd be quite happy to watch that all day.Even kissing does bother a lot of people though, and I see that as being their own fault. Unfortunately, the majority of voters seem to be in this category. And democracy is founded on the voters wishes.I don't get what you're saying here, and I have no idea what difference it makes considering what you want to watch, and what you don't.Are there men/women doing their buisness outside you're home? or in public? I don't see alot of that around here, but who knows.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

Where I come from you have to be married if you want to adopt, and you can't marry the same sex.That is a pretty appalling system. I don't get what you're saying here, and I have no idea what difference it makes considering what you want to watch, and what you don't.You asked me if it bothered me/others to see them. That is my feelings on the matter. I don't tend to see it unless I happen to be in a gay bar, but that isn't often. While I don't really care, some people do. And unfortunately 51% of voters are allowed to oppress everyone else. My concern is that gay marriage is being voted against, which means that more people don't like seeing it than those that can be bothered to vote for something which will probably never affect them. And while we may disagree with the result, it's hard to argue with democracy.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

That is a pretty appalling system.I agree :)You asked me if it bothered me/others to see them. That is my feelings on the matter. I don't tend to see it unless I happen to be in a gay bar, but that isn't often. While I don't really care, some people do. And unfortunately 51% of voters are allowed to oppress everyone else. My concern is that gay marriage is being voted against, which means that more people don't like seeing it than those that can be bothered to vote for something which will probably never affect them. And while we may disagree with the result, it's hard to argue with democracy.Wow, I didn't think people could ever be so stupid. They just want people to look at them selves, than to look at gaysIm not saying that its your opinion, but if people really think that, they're crazy.I really don't know wich side you're on actually :P Its okay to be natural tho
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

I probably should clarify. I'm here because it interests me to know what reasons people have. I support do support gay marriage. In England the debate has come down to whether or not a legally identical thing (Civil-partnerships) should be renamed marriage. In my mind, both sides are being pedantic over wording and I think it's pretty pointless. However, if it was a matter of race, I would support changing "black marriage" to just marriage, so that's the view I have to hold here as well.They're not crazy, they're Christian. They have been taught forever to overthrow their own view of morality and reason, and instead accept what some guy in a big building up the road tells them. I think I can forgive them on the grounds of ignorance. I can't forgive the millions of straight men and women that couldn't be bothered to vote simply because the issue didn't directly affect them.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

I am a christian.I have read the bible, also where it says: Man shall not be with another man, and woman shall not be with another woman.This is my personal law, Im not gonna be with another woman, couse my belief says its wrong.But not everyone has the same religion as me. I think everyone has the right to believe what they want, and marry whomever they want.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

That's perfectly reasonable, unless you're attracted to woman. For people who are attracted to the same sex and are religious, it causes them a lot of unnecessary distress. I assume that isn't the case for you though, so that is a perfectly good system.The bible says a lot of crazy things, that's why most Christians don't read it.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

The bible says a lot of crazy things, that's why most Christians don't read it.Yeah, its sad.. or at least I think its sad. But its also good if you go to church, and the priest will explain to everyone, and they'll learn to understand it.it causes them a lot of unnecessary distress.I so agree on this.I've seen CHRISTIAN parents kick they're children out of the house, becouse they don't live up to the parents christian standards. Some teenagers get pregnant, find out they're gay or something else, that don't 'fit in' the church.And thats aweful. When christians do that, I wonder if there is any difference between islam and christianity after all. You know christians are going around and telling people how good and kind they are? And the next you know their children are on their own on the street.Not only underage children. I know a lesbian, who's christian parents didn't want anything to do with her, when she told them who she really was. She was 20 back then, and she has never spoken to her parents since.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

It should be allowed because it's love. IT'S LOVE PEOPLE
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

This has nothing to do about their actions. Listen, they will be confronted and dealt with in the end, not my problem. I do not want to control them from being together, I honestly don't care. However, they DO NOT get to claim the title of marriage and receive the benefits of marriage when there is no such a thing! http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage  read it and weep!It is not recognized by our constitution as a right. The end. And it won't get added. If a state wants to legalize it they can try.Personally, I say don't legalize it nor make it illegal, that way it will not be legally recognized however a person can either deny or accept "ceremonially" performing a wedding for them.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

Marriage is a civil ceremony, and therefore a civil right. Someone wanting the same rights as you is not asking for "special" rights, just the same ones you have.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

You can't seriously use a dictionary definition to argue against gay marriage, especially when the definition of words and phrases changes all the time.Fact of the matter is, any modern society worth its salt is always changing. Fifty years ago inter-racial relationships were unthinkable, let alone marriages. Once upon a time marriage had more to do with status and family importance than anything else. The world will not collapse due to gay marriage and those who feel it will are ignorant of history.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

Love does not require marriage. You have not made an argument.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

Same sex couples can adopt and help kids in foster-care.Peace!
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

They don't have to be married to do so. Besides, that has nothing to do with my point about them not having a special set of rights that no one else has!
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

Saying gay people can't be married is like saying black people can't be married. It is completely bigoted.You Christians are saying that gay marriage is not Christian because of the bible. Well, if you want to stick to biblical standards of marriage, then you have to stone women who cheat on their husbands. Also, you are allowed to take as many wives as you like. Oh and by the way, women, you are your husbands property according to the "Good Book".So much for "a Christian tradition". I don't really understand why gays want to be part of Christianity anyway, it's like being a Jewish Nazi.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Same-sex

I don't like the way this question is phrased. People should be "allowed" to be with whoever they want. And they're going to. Even if we decided to be unconstitutional and dissolve the separation of church and state how would you enforce peoples personal relationships? So naturally people should be legally allowed to be with whoever they want. But that doesn't mean we have to change the definition of marriage. The protection of marriage is about protecting the definition of marriage by law. So it's not a question of gay people being oppressed. So "gay marriage" does exist in some states. So it's more a question of should the definition of marriage be changed at a national level. Why? Marriage is a religious thing. So it all seems kind of ironic. Most People for gay marriage are not religious. It would be a good compromise if they formed some other type of union. I think they just wan't what they can't have. It's like two children and a toy.
Debate: Should gay marriage be allowed
Side: Opposite-sex

Marriage has been swallowed by religion. Records of marriage go back as far as we have records. It is something that has essentially always happened. The main religions didn't exist back then. Essentially, we chose to have marriage defined like that in a time when gays were oppressed. If we created it, why can't we change it?