azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

Ah i see now but I'm going to ask, what if the baby could be saved but the mother would die what would you do then? Also I do think there should be a time after which an abortion should not be allowed, but when the embryo is lets say a few weeks old it is basically just a ball of cells and is definitely not a human by any means. I do think discussions should be had about when is the latest someone should be allowed to have an abortion and also education should be given to people so they won't need to have one, but i still think there should be a choice. I do think people should take measures before hand if they do not want to have children, just getting pregnant and then having an abortion is unnecessary if you could prevent the pregnancy in the first place.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

It's is a homicide to abort a child to save a mother. That's true.But not all homicides are murders. Personally, I would like to see laws that require doctors to at least TRY to save BOTH the mother and her young in a crisis pregnancy.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

Indeed! While a justifiable homicide still is a homicide, it can not be treated the same as a murder. Efforts are made (or should be made) to save BOTH the mother and her prenatal child in these cases. However, when allowing the pregnancy to continue will likely kill BOTH? The abortion (termination of the pregnancy) is justified to save the life of one over the other.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I am mostly against abortion. They say it is the right of the mother to choose, but what about the rights of the child?? Do children/fetuses have rights?
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

No, no, no, no. A baby is a baby, they are defenseless. And is a life that we do not have the right to destroy. I also don't agree with capital punishment.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

Fetuses are not babies they are potential babies.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

They are real enough to be photographed and recognized as children in many of our laws.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

well abortion is still legal and never will change so get over it.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I'll take that bet.Regardless, we aren't going to stop fighting it until we have established the rights of children in the womb to not be killed unjustly.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

I'll take that bet.stupidest bet I've ever seen.Regardless, we aren't going to stop fighting it until we have established the rights of children in the womb to not be killed unjustly.gl with that.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

Thank you.That's such a nice thing for you to say. I'm sure you mean it too.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

well a hopeless plight such as your needs a great deal of luck.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I consider it to be a honor to fight for the rights of children who really have no-one else fighting for them. Win or loose, I don't consider it 'hopeless.'It would only be 'hopeless' if no-one were fighting for them at all.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

Well call me evil but I am very much so against infanticide
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

First i am assuming that you are absolute pro-life so correct me if if im wrong in assuming this.What if a it was a kid who was raped?
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I do not agree with you because we should think that if our mothers had liked abortion than we would not have lots of pleasure .plz think once would you like to die without any sin.if we like it than we can say that we are terrorist because there is no difference between terrorist and me.terrorist kill people and we are also kill clean handed baby.we will be more rascal than terrorist if i like it because we kill a innocent lady who can be our best leader/guide or social worker i think it is so bad to like abortion. _Nawaz
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

Killing an unborn baby is the same as killing a born baby. You're killing a child with a whole life ahead of it. It taking a life because you just don't want to deal with it.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

An fetus baby is just a potential baby not an actual baby.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

you running out of down votes there chuz.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

Bro, when you were a fetus your not parentless. .
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

"Potential" beings can not have an actual real and tangible physical existence. A sperm and an egg cell have the 'potential' to begin a new child's life. After fertilization, their potential has been realized and that child's life, growth and development has already began.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

If you have sex... and you get knocked up... well thats your problem... because you are the one that had the sex.. So dont abort a baby... I mean what if you were abroted?? I understand if you would get an abortion if you got raped.. but if you messed up and didnt take the pill or bother to even ask if he had a condom on then.. thats yours to deal with... keep the kid.. even if you are a teen.... have the baby and put it up for adoption so a family that cant have a baby can have one...
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

i personally am against abortion, i don't think it would be fair to the baby to not give it a chance to live a life that its entitled. abortion goes against everything i believe in and against good morals and values. i know that people have different morals, values and believes and i respect that. but i just find it hard to respect someone that has the guts to take another humans life and not even feel bad or guilty. for all those mothers out there especially teenage mothers i respect them for sticking it out and going ahead with the pregnancy...ps.(hope i have not offended anyone with what i wrote)
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

Abortion is simply legalized murder. And the worst of any murder you can think. If a mother can kill her own children so easily, then what makes you think that he wont do the same to strangers?
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

1. According to our Constitution, all 'persons' are entitled to the 'equal protections of our laws.' (5th and 14th Amendment) 2. Scientists have already proved that a human life begins at and by conception. For example, they have established the fact that conception is when a person's aging begins. 3. We already have laws which make the unlawful killing of a child in the womb a 'crime' of 'murder.' (see Unborn Victims of Violence Act and State Fetal Homicide laws)It is an unacceptable inconsistency in our laws which establish the fact that a person who kills an unborn child during a robbery can be charged with MURDER... and yet the mother can kill the same child for any reason she wants to (with an abortion) and not be charged with the same. Abortions are murders for these (above) reasons and that is why I oppose them.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

Aye, there are many crazy laws, though. Like not getting fish drunk and so on, so law is pretty much useless here. A positive straight line graph begins somewhere, too- and 2 has much difference to 4940.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

Unless you are saying that fetal himicide laws and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act are "crazy laws" and you can prove them to be so? Your comments here are 'non sequiturs' and as such are not even worthy of further consideration.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

My point is that the entire legal system in most countries is pretty crazy- take insurance and suing, the idea that someone can pay more than they have- daft. So law is not applicable to ethics, really.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I do not support it as long as the baby has been in the womb for more than three weeks. I can't stand the thought of remembering the child scream at four weeks old in the womb.. Lives are given by than, they shall not be taken away. Kill the parasite before it has life, if not, do not kill the new human.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

abortion is wrong no human should die abortion is wrong what if you were that baby and your mom had a abortion
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Supportive of Abortion

I agree and disagree at the same time. I believe that there are times when abortion is best.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

The only abortion I support is for mothers who are at risk of death and their babies are less than 20 weeks from conception, but it has to be done in a humane manner.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

unless there is a genuine medical case to abort then why not go full term and have the baby immediately adopted out.couples who opt to abort a healthy fetus are immotionally immature in my opinion.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I think of abortion the way i think of murder. If you netflix and chill and it goes down, you have to pay for your own actions dont make the baby pay. for all the females out there either wait till marriage or deal with it
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I'm personally against abortion. I'm not religious, but I do think it's immoral.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

I personally am against abortion. The whole abortion debate essentially rests on the question of whether the fetus counts as a person. If it does, then abortion is morally wrong, as abortion is equivalent to murder. If it does not, then abortion is perfectly acceptable. I believe that the fetus does count as a person.
Debate: Are you against Abortion? Or do you Support it?
Side: Against Abortion

..............................................................................
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Yes I am against smoking because it is really bad and unhealthy for your body and you can get lung cancer and even die from smoking. I just reached 2.5K points!
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Yes, and this is just the harmful effects on the smoker himself. Consider all the other harmful effects that the smoker impose on people around him. I think smoking is inherently bad. Just compare the short term gratification and long term health effects.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

HAPPY BELATED 2500 POINT PARTY!
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Weed is fine, and so is tobacco. It is that chemical shit that they add that gets ya. Both weed and tobacco have been smoked for centuries with minimal effects but then some idiot started adding bad stuff. There is more to this story than meets the eyes is all I am saying.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Almost every day I pass some fucking smokers, that stench is revolting. I do not want to have that shit in my nose or mouth, and they do not need that pointless crap in the first place. I am not the one who has to find alternative routes, they must find other places to kill their lungs, places away from the public.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

Almost every day I pass some fucking automobiles, that stench is revolting. I do not want to have that shit in my nose or mouth, and they do not need that pointless crap in the first place. I am not the one who has to find alternative routes, they must find other places to drive, places away from the public.Almost every day I pass some fucking industry, that stench is revolting. I do not want to have that shit in my nose or mouth, and they do not need that pointless crap in the first place. I am not the one who has to find alternative routes, they must find other places to build things, places away from the public.Almost every day I pass some fucking people having a fire in their fireplace in the comfort of their own home, that stench is revolting. I do not want to have that shit in my nose or mouth, and they do not need that pointless crap in the first place. I am not the one who has to find alternative routes, they must find other places to enjoy a fire, places away from the public.Almost every day I pass some fucking people having a BBQ, that stench is revolting. I do not want to have that shit in my nose or mouth, and they do not need that pointless crap in the first place. I am not the one who has to find alternative routes, they must find other places to kill their lungs, places away from the public.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Automobiles are actually necessary for society's progress. So is industry. Fire in the fireplace, if there is no alternative or cheaper source of warmth present then it is justified, it is necessary for a decent life (you've heard of such a thing as a winter?). Barbeque is cooking food (I'm not gonna tell you what food is for, figure it out yourself).Smoking is not necessary nor needed. Never has been and never will be.Honestly, think first.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

So you're only willing to put up with things you dislike if they are absolutely necessary for society's progress? That seems rather totalitarian of you. Isn't providing entertainment or pleasure reason enough for something to be allowed to exist? And no, I don't know what winter is, I live in California.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Absolutely necessary?Smoking harms the smoker and it annoys many of those who don't and do not want to breathe in that pointless crap. It also is a complete waste of money.Entertainment and pleasure that is not harming people (many smokers do it because they are addicted) and not annoying others. Smoking as legal is not justified, if it is legal then all drugs should be. A government should see to it that all its citizens are as healthy as possible. Isn't a government supposed to serve its people? Sometimes that means doing things that some won't like, as banning addictive and harming substances like cigarettes. The only reason they don't ban them is because they are taxed, because they get lots of money from people buying that pointless crap.Too bad you're frying all the time. Winter can be a bitch but still a beautiful one.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

Fast food harms the consumer and I'm annoyed every time I see morbidly obese people eating fast food, but I wouldn't suggest a ban on fast food. Loud music can be annoying at times (through admittedly not particularly harmful so long as your not at a show) but I'm less inclined to propose a ban on loud music than I am to just suck it up when I'm walking by some loud music. I don't see why you can't take this attitude with smoking. It's not your choice, fine. You dont see the point. Fine. But other people do choose to smoke and do enjoy it, and they should be allowed to. And I agree: all drugs should be legal. Legalize, educate, regulate. And yes, it is too bad I'm frying all the time. I've got a great tan year-round but that's the only up-side. Both my parents immigrated here from cold ass countries, and I'm really not built for the heat. Once I'm done working my way through college I'm trying to move back to someplace cold.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

If I ever see you, I'm going to take a hit the size of hurricane Issac and blow it in your face.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

That is so sweet. Thank you!But seriously, if you met me and you had malevolent intentions toward me and you actually cared to act them out then you'd end up in a hospital. Not joking at all. And furthermore, if you actually saw me you'd probably reconsider...And smoking should be illegal, just as are other drugs. You want to go further? Just read VecVeltro's arguments again 'cause they reflect reality not your wishful thinking.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Watch out, everyone!We got a real tough guy over here. Well, we've got an internet tough guy, which isn't quite the same thing. In fact, it kind of implies the opposite; we're probably dealing with a skinny, pasty, cowardly 15 year old child who likes to talk big.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

we're probably dealing with a skinny, pasty, cowardly 15 year old child who likes to talk big.The opposite actually. And I'm not 15, been years since that.I simply replied to GuitarisDog's "argument". What's wrong with that?
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

That's the beauty of the internet: you can pretend to be whoever you want to be! In my experience, though, people who go out of their way to act physically tough on the internet (a forum in which no threats or provocations can actually be dealt with or acted upon, physically) are usually physically lacking. Or you're a meathead who likes to solve his disputes with violence, but then, what would you be doing on an internet debate site? Why not go beat the shit out of some smokers?If someone was as rude to me about my smoking as you were to smokers in general with your post, and I happened to be smoking a cigarette at the time, I would probably blow a hit in his face, too. Kind of like when some jackass takes it upon himself to yell "SLOW DOWN!" at me when I'm driving 27 in a 25 zone, I promptly rev my engine and speed up. Not very mature, I know, and two wrongs don't make a right, but and eye for an eye, I suppose. You're a jackass to me, and you've got jackassery coming right back at you. I know blowing a hit of smoke into the face of someone as sensitive and intolerant as you is a severe insult, and I don't believe in unnecessary insults, but I do believe in responding to them in kind.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

I don't pretend to be someone I'm not. Never have. I'm rather disinclined to lying.I said "...and you had malevolent intentions toward me and you actually cared to act them out then..." That indicates I would only get physical if someone attacked me first.If someone was as rude to me about my smoking as you were to smokers in general with your post, and I happened to be smoking a cigarette at the time, I would probably blow a hit in his face, too.Smokers are rude to me by polluting the air I breathe. What I said wasn't rude, it reflected how it is. Cigarettes are pointless crap that harm the smoker and annoy many of those that don't. If they aren't smart enough to keep away from that addictive shit then it is their problem if someone says something like I did. I haven't tried not one cigarette in my life and neither do I need any.If someone'd hit me I'd hit back far worse.You're a jackass to me, and you've got jackassery coming right back at you.I'm not the one who initiates trouble. If someone is as disrespectful as to smoke in public then they have it coming anyway. And if they became violent because of something I'd say, instead of leaving and finding some private places, the more they'd have it coming.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

The "malevolent intentions" you were talking about would be blowing a hit of smoke in your face after you called the smoker a "fucking smoker," called them "revolting," and otherwise complained about how their mode of pleasure and enjoyment is pointless shit. You go on to imply that no intelligent person would smoke. If you said all that to me, you've got something your way; in this case, a hit of smoke. If you said all that you would be initiating trouble, just like I would be initiating trouble if I attacked you're interests and pleasures and insulted you personally for it. And it was rude. Even if that was "how it is" you still laid out your argument in an offensive and provocative manner. Also I can't speak to your country, but here in the US if you're stupid enough to stand around in a DSA and bitch about smoking and smokers (as rudely as you did), best case scenario you get laughed at and ignored worst case you get jumped. Smokers here are not allowed to smoke in many public places, so to place yourself in a designated smoking area and then whine about how smokers are annoying when they smoke in public would come across as extremely infantile. Also it seems like you're still only willing to tolerate things you find rude or annoying if they are absolutely necessary to our society. This seems like the will of a crazy, tyrannical dictator.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

I'm not the one who initiates trouble. If someone is as disrespectful as to smoke in public then they have it coming anyway.Oh and you banning them from smoking isn't disrespectful, cause you don't like it? Why don't you just let them be and ask them to take a step back or you take a step back, seriously, the smoke doesn't go that far, I don't tell you to stay in your home just because I don't like the way your breathe smells.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

I don't smoke the legal stuff, I smoke the legal stuff and I think a hit the size of hurricane Issac the force would likely kill everyone.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

Also Vec's arguments are opinionated, baseless claims; he tries to build valid arguments with passion and emotion, not reality. His arguments actually depend on fiction in order to be valid.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Then why are they true?
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: NO

Obviously a hit the size of a Hurricane would cause my lungs to explode and would likely kill everyone within a 10 mile radius of me, so you'd be in the hospital to.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

I'd rather people didn't smoke, but if that's your thing, I ain't gonna stop you.Like cannabis, or broccoli, or... foot fetishists... Yea, I got nothing.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

People smoke broccoli and foot fetishists??? Well that's just strange.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

O yea, massive scandals over here in Britain when Boris Johnson was caught smoking car freshener in a shisha pipe.What can I say, us Brits are fucked up.
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Well, it's not for me but some people are crabby as hell when they don't have their smokes and I'd rather deal with the smoke than some bitchy twit!
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

Smoking causes respiratory problems, and bonds between your family will weaken. your family members will also get respiratory problems due to secondhand inhalation too. You also have to pay for cigarettes
Debate: ARE YOU AGAINST SMOKING?
Side: YES

yes, I am, many say that the government intervening in smoking does nothing, actually, if you regulate it, you will get less smokers, as proven in Canada