azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Catastrophic healthcare is the only thing I believe we should guarantee to people without insurance.There is not enough money in the world to provide free healthcare for the common cold and other elective healthcare. It's funny how people always find money to buy Cell phones, alcohol, cigarettes, drugs, etc. etc. but when it comes to their health, they want others to foot the bill.Everyone should pay for part of their healthcare because everyone has money they use for their vices.You will notice how the Democrat (Socialist) Party never talk about catastrophic healthcare when crying about people dying without insurance. It's all about politics and votes to them. They refuse to compromise with the GOP when it comes to common sense Healthcare.They will see America go bankrupt as they force through their Socialist agendas.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I don’t believe we should have universal healthcare for free. Because free health care has been seen as unsanitary and less efficient. There is even people who are traveling to places where healthcare isn’t free because obviously free health care isn’t working out. The patients aren’t treated properly and as quickly as they should be. Even though you do have to pay a lot for healthcare it’s better that way because people get more efficient treatments and medical attention.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

Although you make a valid point that treatments and medical attention would be less efficient simply because it would be free, its better then not receiving anything medical attention at all.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Healthcare should not be free. If healthcare is free for everyone then there would be little to no advancements in medicine as we wouldn’t be able to afford it, healthcare let’s us have these advancements and allow us to have many lifesaving medicines using the money healthcare provides. Although it may seem like a good idea it wouldn’t be best as it can have many issues with wait time and life changing medicines.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Spending more time on helping patients will limit the technological advances that could possibly be made. There will be more issues with letting healthcare be free for all.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Taking care of ourselves might be cost effective in the long run because of the increase in taxes that would occur if we had health care for all. Wait times would be longer and everybody would not get the necessary medical attention that they need. Although, health care for all might not be that bad, it will make the government control more of how much medicine could be given to hospitals. Therefore, taking care of ourselves is much more effective than health care for all.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I agree health care should not be free in America because as an adult you should be able to take care of your self and of all of your children. You shouldn't have kids if you know you can't afford to keep them healthy and take them to the hospital. If health Care was free we should have less money to spend on more important stuff such as free lunch in schools, scholarships, and the free education we get up until high school.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Even though I believe free healthcare would be beneficial, I believe that if we do change are system in today's world it would either collapse or be a really bad system and cause lots of drama as all the drug companies and insurance companies will sue the government.I think it would really benefit everyone if the healthcare system stayed the same,although we could lower costs if needed insurances for poor.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

If it is free Hospitals and employees would not care possibly then less hospitals will be owned and the government would own hospitals
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

It could be more affordable to benefit all but not completely FREE
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

The reason why health care shouldn’t be free is because many people will abuse the system. People will start to go for any little reason and will be wasting the time of those who actually need to be there. I do believe they should better the system and for certain cases people shouldn’t have to pay but overall I think health care shouldn’t be free. The waiting time is already long, why make it longer.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I choose this position because under the single-payer system in the US tax obligations would double. Bernie Sander’s healthcare plan would cost more for 71% of working families including low-income families. His proposed federal taxes wont even be enough to cover the cost. Universal Healthcare could put a strain on working Americans.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Having health care can be very useful for us but can also be abused by people.It is important to limit the use of health care before it gets taken away.It is important to only use health care when needed or in case of an emergency....sometimes people try to use health insurance for small things...other people can actually use it for a life and death situation.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Only very few people have gone in debt due to medical bills. Also, if we have free healthcare our hospitals won’t be as nice and clean instead they will be dirty and the wait will be long.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I disagree because according to my research more than 137 million people have been affected and struggling to pay their medical bill. I would say thats a big number wouldn’t you?!
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

137 million is a third of the entire American population. What exactly do you mean by struggling to pay medical bills? By what metric is that measured? So yeah I’d say it’s a big number, a little too big to be true
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I disagree because if we take of ourselves down of us will be left in debt while others shine. If we do people will judge the country as a bad country that doesn’t take care of their citizens.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Free government run healthcare isn’t the solution to lowering costs. More privatization and less regulation is the answer as is with most problems with prices in the market. Government price controls and intervention isn’t the answer, it will only make things worse in the long run.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I disagree, a lot of people that are in debt is due to hospital bills and government will run things smoothly because government will want to look good and the lines will not be long because the government will pay more doctors and hire more doctors wich will make waiting time shorter
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

If you look at any one of the other socialized healthcare systems, there isn’t a single one where the government has run things smoothly and healthcare hasn’t been rationed to the people. The government runs the DPS, the VA, and Medicaid and Medicare and social security, and they are all programs that are either slow, inefficient, or running out of money.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

Only few people have gone into debt due to medical bills yes. However those few people are enough. Boone deserves to have a ruined life for trying to take care of their health. Who's to say that the hospital's will be dirty? That can't be proven until it is tried.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I doubt that the hospitals will be dirty if there is free healthcare, the medical places will still be helpful regardless.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

i don’t agree because healthcare would be run by the government and help in the long run as medical places as people help and work for their money
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I kinda agree but disagree a little on this.The amoung in debt should be lower although I think free healthcare will make hospitals not care anymore and not have any ethics,safety measures or proffessinallity
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

The healthcare system needs more privatization to increase the supply and competition, lowering costs. Not more government regulation and bureaucracy.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I sort of agree because the government should decrease the cost for healthcare but not decrease it so much to where it is free.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I disagree because if the government can lower the cost, they might as well just cut the entire cost and take out more tax dollars which, if I may add, would STILL be cheaper and more efficient than pricey healthcare.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I disagree, people should not have to pay to keep their life healthy. Also, we can't depend on the government to do anything. If we do it will take forever for them to amend healthcare.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

Healthcare should be free because it could be a matter of life or death for that individual. Even if costs were decreased depending on their position, they still may not be able to afford it, so that's why I believe healthcare should be free
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

Health care should not be free for anyone if they can’t afford it. Everyone should not be awarded a reward like healthcare if they can’t afford it. People are out here working every single day of their lives to maintain themselves by going to the doctors or the hospital. Homeless people who deliberately DECIDE to be homeless don’t deserve any type of aid, especially paid aid that every single person pays in taxes.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I agree with this statement because any medical assistance is something that a person didn’t have before, and even if it isn’t top notch medical care, it’s still helping a patient.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I agree because the government shouldn’t make medicines that people are truly in need of cost like $1,000,000 or something that’s to much just for some medicine and I get it somethings are not free and you may have to pay for it but It shouldn’t be to where you about to die and need medicine and it’s cost is in the thousands range.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: Healthcare for all

I kinda agree with this statement as we could lower healthcare costs so alot more could receive it and less debt but not free as it may mess the system up.
Debate: Fall 2019-What's your vote? Health Care in the US- Should it be universal, government ran?
Side: We can take care of ourselves

I decided to join the side where it’s not universal which states that we can take care of our selves because I just don’t believe in the universal health care system because you have people without health insurance and they get denied treatment because they can’t afford it and also, in commercials when the health care programs come on they really be trying to make it seem like they care about you and your health but they don’t I believe they just want the money and try to persuade people to get universal health care when their going to just deny them.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: Yes, it is responsible.

Fast Food is responsible for teenage obesity.In America, the amount of fast food has increased over the years. And statistics show that teens who eat fast food for 2 or more times a week gain 10 pounds more than those who eat less fast food than them in a week. Hence fast food is responsible for teenage obesity.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: No, it is not responsible.

I feel that fast food is not responsible for teenage obesity. Fast food is food that are prepared within a short amount of time so that people can have them quickly, especially when they are rushed for time. Teenage obesity refers to people, aged from 13 to 19, being more than average fatness, or if your body mass index is above 30. I feel that fast food is not responsible for teenage obesity because many students have a tendency to skip lessons like endurance trainings just because that lesson is very energy consuming and exhausting. People who are sports lovers, of course continue to attend this lesson as per normal. However, if some students, who really dislike sports, may just find all the different reasons to be excused from this lesson, while they cheer their friends on. Many schools have also decided to cut down PE lessons. This will further cause the teen to gain more weight as he or she is eating the same amount of food, BUT, without much exercise. According to one of the recent study, it has shown that 7 percent of the nation’s 6- to 19-year-olds are obese, and that more than a third are overweight. Those rates have about doubled in the past three decades. Therefore, I feel that fast food is not the cause of obesity in teenagers but the lack of physical exercises or PE lessons.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: No, it is not responsible.

what were the activities of those children though? did the ones who eat fast food just sit behind computers all day and did the teenagers who didn't exercise every second day? according to scientific processes this is not a fair test to produce accurate statistics
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: No, it is not responsible.

I would like to rebut against grace37's point. Even though those teen who eat fast food for 2 or more times a week and gains 10 pounds(about 4.5kg) than those who eat lesser fast food, it does not mean that fast food is the cause of their obesity. Gaining 10 pounds doesn't mean that they will become obese. It is just one of the risk factors that will lead to overweight. Other factors maybe consuming other foods that contains fats and calories. It may not be solely fast food's fault. If the teenagers does regular exercise, they would probably lose weight too. Thus, I disagree that fast food is responsible for teenage obesity.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: Yes, it is responsible.

The tall shaft of cowboy boots provides protection for the ankles and feet https://mencowboyboots.co.uk, making them ideal for various outdoor activities.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: Yes, it is responsible.

I agree that fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Fast food refers to food that can be prepared quickly and easily sold in restaurants or store with preheated or precooked ingredients. When you first consider what is the contributing factor of teenage obesity, it would definitely be the over consuming of fast food like Mcdonald, KFC, long john silvers, burger king etc where their food products contain a large amount of oil which would cause them to gain fats. Nowadays, children have been exposed to more technology than any other generation before them. The personal computer is the most modern technological invention that is like a magnet to kids. When kids start surfing the net, they lose complete track of time and become more sedentary. Most times while using the computer, because of the convenience of fast food, they are snacking on it adding to the obesity problem. Of course, we can't put the blame for teen obesity solely on computers. Television and video games are equally responsible for kids being less physically active. Convenience stores and fast food restaurants are everywhere and most of their advertising targets children. Whether it is to get that next monopoly piece, have the newest big gulp, or the toys included with meals. Normally fast food are food that is high in fat and sugar content which is considered junk food. Children have easy access to junk food that is high in fat and sugars where they can't resist the temptation of sweets and treats so they will consume it.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: No, it is not responsible.

I would like to dispute phylliswai36's point. Since you said that because kids are losing track of time while surfing the net, it means that kids did not have time for exercising after consuming fast food. "Television and video games are equally responsible for kids being less physically active." This shows that the kids are spending more time playing games rather than exercising after meal. Thus, it goes back to my point that not exercising enough is the main cause of teenage obesity.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: Yes, it is responsible.

By not exercising is not the main cause of teenage obesity. Some of the children who doesn't exercise and eats a balanced meal regularly still stays quite healthy. Exercise could mean walking too and they need to walk wherever they go. Also, there is physical education in school which ensures them to exercise 2-3 times a week. Thus it is not possible that lack of exercise is the main cause of teenage obesity. n 1993, for example, 66 percent of teens got enough short bursts of vigorous exercise — 20 minutes of running, biking or other heart-pumping activity at least three days per week. That figure was 64 percent in 2005. When it came to moderate exercise which should, according to guidelines, be performed at least 30 minutes per day, on five or more days per week, only 27 percent met that goal in 1999. That figure was unchanged in 2005. The researchers also found a decline in teenagers’ TV time, which is interesting, because it has been widely believed that an increase in TV time is one of the causes of obesity.In 1999, 43 percent of students spent three or more hours watching TV on school days but this figure dipped to 35 percent in 2007. Wang (researcher of John Hopkins University) said these findings suggest that waning exercise levels are “not likely the major explanation of the recent increase in obesity among U.S. adolescents.” Then it should be other factors which is actually the high consumption of junk food – sugar/high fructose corn syrup and fatty foods – that are the culprit.Sadly, the desire for the junk foods is pretty much an addiction. Studies of the brain function of people with substance addictions has found that junk food triggers the same activity and response in the brain.And a new study by researchers at the Scripps Research Institute in Florida found similar reactions in rats. Pleasure centers in the brains of rats fed high-fat, high-calorie food became less responsive over time – a signal that the rats were becoming addicted. The rats started to eat more and more. They even went for the junk food when they had to endure an electric shock to get it. “Your brain reacts almost identically to that of a cocaine addict looking at cocaine,” said Dr. Louis J. Aronne, a clinical professor at Weill Cornell Medical School and former president of The Obesity Society. “And the interesting thing is that someone who is obese has even more similarity to the cocaine addict. In many ways, they can be addicted to junk food.”And even more sadly, food companies know this and create their food products with this in mind – they want people to be addicted to their products, because then they have a customer for life, regardless of the consequences.And the consequences are that these junk food addicts will be caught in the treadmill of a High Density Lifestyle unless they break their addiction.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: No, it is not responsible.

So as long as teenager dont eat them, they would not be obese. Right? So why blame fast food? Its innocent!
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: Yes, it is responsible.

I agree that fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Fast food is basically food that can be prepared within a short time and can be eaten fast. Teenage refers to people between the ages of 13 to 19. Obesity means to have too much body fat in the body.Teenage obesity is caused by the teenager's surroundings. Teens are more likely to be overweight if they live near convenience stores and are less likely to be overweight if they live near supermarkets that offer a wide variety of healthful food. If they are surrounded by fast food restaurants, they are more likely to be prone to eat it as it is convenient. Who would want to go further and buy healthy food if you are just near a fast food restaurant? There are 33,000 MacDonald's restaurants in the world. This proved that fast food restaurants are all around you, attracting you and you cannot resist it. Hence I think that fast food is responsible for teenage obesity.
Debate: Fast food is responsible for teenage obesity. Do you agree?
Side: No, it is not responsible.

I would like to disagree that PeiPei18 said that teenage obesity is caused by the teenager's surroundings. if the teenagers are really self conscious, i believe that most of them would still be willing to spend more effort to walk further away from their house to buy something more healthy instead of buying something unhealthy from a fast food restaurant nearer to their house. I believe that what cause them to prefer to buy food from the fast food restaurant nearer to their house is a lack of control of their temptations and laziness.