azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Oh, then may I hear your explanation for how everything came from nothing?It didn't, something was always there, just like your God. The Guadalupe isnt God, it is a miracle feat that defies the laws of Physics. It is an evidence that the paranormal exist and stunned scientists who questioned it.You are awesome with your sighs, and inability to read. I am not sure how you came to think that I said Guadalupe was God. You finally got something right though. Guadalupe only shows the paranormal exists, not God.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

It didn't, something was always there, just like your God.That defies the scientific process, now does it?I am not sure how you came to think that I said Guadalupe was God. You finally got something right though. Guadalupe only shows the paranormal exists, not GodArent the existence of the paranormal dependent on the existence of a divine being? I fail to see how you cant prove God with it
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

That defies the scientific process, now does it?Nope. Science leads us to believe that there was a lot of energy, then a Big Bang, then the energy was able to change to matter. It can still always be there, there isn't a problem.Arent the existence of the paranormal dependent on the existence of a divine being?Well, no, it doesn't have to be divine, just "weird".I fail to see how you cant prove God with itYour definition of God is the creator of the universe. How can you say that whatever created Guadalupe must also be the creator of the universe. That's like jumping off a cliff of logic.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I will reply to this one later. I am almost late for work
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Nope. Science leads us to believe that there was a lot of energy, then a Big Bang, then the energy was able to change to matter. It can still always be there, there isn't a problem.That still defies the laws of physics.Well, no, it doesn't have to be divine, just "weird".In what way is that not divine?Your definition of God is the creator of the universe. How can you say that whatever created Guadalupe must also be the creator of the universe. That's like jumping off a cliff of logic.Simple, it has a back story and the image leans in favor of religion
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

That still defies the laws of physics.Wrong, sorry. Nothing is violated by what I said.In what way is that not divine?Are you out of your mind? There is no reason to think it is divine at all. You only claim it to be paranormal. That's like me saying hey we explained one thing that God previously did as natural, therefore no God. You have one worthless example that we don't really know how it exists, and you are claiming to know how it exists, it is awesome.Simple, it has a back story and the image leans in favor of religionIt does not favor religion at all. No religion mentions that God created Guadalupe, and that is your only evidence of His existence.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Wrong, sorry. Nothing is violated by what I said.In science, everything has its origins. So I ask, where did that energy came from?Are you out of your mind? There is no reason to think it is divine at all. You only claim it to be paranormal.You simply says that being weird isnt a proof of God. I still cannot see how the Guadalupe isnt a proof of his existenceIt does not favor religion at all. No religion mentions that God created Guadalupe, and that is your only evidence of His existence.Just search for "History of Our Lady of Guadalupe" you will find plenty.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

In science, everything has its origins. So I ask, where did that energy came from?I disagree with your assertion. At time 0 there was a certain situation. Nobody asks what came before the beginning of anything except this. That is very strange to me. Science says that everything can be traced back to that point, which it does, so nothing is violated. I guess your idea is better because when you have the same exact problem you can wave your hands and say supernatural. Congratulations.You simply says that being weird isnt a proof of God. I still cannot see how the Guadalupe isnt a proof of his existenceThen you are dumb. Please explain how you can prove that the creator of Guadalupe is also the creator of the universe.Just search for "History of Our Lady of Guadalupe" you will find plenty.Thanks, that's what I was saying. Some random guy claimed that he was told God created Guadalupe, that is not part of the religion. Was that what you were expecting me to find?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I disagree with your assertion. At time 0 there was a certain situation. Nobody asks what came before the beginning of anything except this.sighI like your diligent attitude but if you keep on making up your own scientific logic, then I will lose my respect for you.Your statement reach nothing more than to be labeled as "pseudo-science" (no offense intended). Please allow me to strengthen your reasons by a small lecture of how the universe really came from absolute nothing.M-Theory for newbies:"The world consists of positive and negative energy. In a mathematical equation, this energies will cancel each other out until it became a neutral 0. Every single matter consists of +energy, while gravity on the other hand consists of -energy.Astrologists and Astrophysicists believe that if you add up all the energies in the universe, you will gain a solid 0. And under that logic, they create the theory of "Inflation". Wherein nothingness expanded by creating +matter that always carries a counter -matter. And this process has been going on for billions of years.In conclusion, something and nothing maybe just the same thing".Please use this information as a weapon against me. Like ask me why I still believe in a God despite my knowledge. Then use it again to disprove my reasonsPlease dont disappoint me :)Then you are dumb. Please explain how you can prove that the creator of Guadalupe is also the creator of the universe.Simple, because Physics can only be defile by the person who created it. Your not gonna say that the Guadalupe is explainable, now will you?Thanks, that's what I was saying. Some random guy claimed that he was told God created Guadalupe, that is not part of the religion. Was that what you were expecting me to find?You never researched about it did you?Please stop making guesses and read thisIt was not a random mantel given by a random bible thumper. It is the result of constant doubt by the people including the priest and bishop themselves.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

sighI like your diligent attitude but if you keep on making up your own scientific logic, then I will lose my respect for you.Your statement reach nothing more than to be labeled as "pseudo-science" (no offense intended). Please allow me to strengthen your reasons by a small lecture of how the universe really came from absolute nothing.M-Theory for newbies:"The world consists of positive and negative energy. In a mathematical equation, this energies will cancel each other out until it became a neutral 0. Every single matter consists of +energy, while gravity on the other hand consists of -energy.Astrologists and Astrophysicists believe that if you add up all the energies in the universe, you will gain a solid 0. And under that logic, they create the theory of "Inflation". Wherein nothingness expanded by creating +matter that always carries a counter -matter. And this process has been going on for billions of years.In conclusion, something and nothing maybe just the same thing".Please use this information as a weapon against me. Like ask me why I still believe in a God despite my knowledge. Then use it again to disprove my reasonsPlease dont disappoint me :)I don't really follow M Theory. But, from that small explanation it shows that you are a complete idiot when you say that Atheists are dumb for thinking something came from nothing. M Theory is saying that there is a positive and negative to everything. So, everything equates to nothing no matter what. So, if it came from nothing that isn't anything special. Besides, YOU STILL HAVE A MASSIVE HOLE IN YOUR ARGUMENT BECAUSE YOU THINK GOD CAME FROM NOTHING.Simple, because Physics can only be defile by the person who created it. Your not gonna say that the Guadalupe is explainable, now will you?You have no proof of this. Sorry. You have established paranormal activity, for now. You don't actually have a real explanation either. You are making a massive blunder by saying that you feel that Guadalupe must be from God because you have no other explanation. This is the same thing I have been talking about. Throughout history the unexplained was God, now it is natural. Maybe in a few years Guadalupe will be natural and you will have to find something else to cling to.You never researched about it did you?Please stop making guesses and read thisIt was not a random mantel given by a random bible thumper. It is the result of constant doubt by the people including the priest and bishop themselves.I read enough to know that it is just random people who have decided this was from God. Quote it or shut up. Do your own damn research. Did Paul mention Guadalupe? How about John? Any books in the Bible mention it?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I can see that. You just kept on making your own pseudo-science.You are way better. Hey look, something unexplained, therefore a God created the universe. I don't think you should judge anyone.The M-theory is the origin of the universe and the greatest weapon any atheist can weild in a religious debate. It was also the exact reason why Stephen Hawkings is still an atheist despite his fading life. I am dissapointed at how you insist on your scientific fallacy instead of accepting what was provenThis doesn't make sense. M Theory leads people to Atheism. You admitted yourself that you have no reason to believe God has anything to do with M Theory. I don't understand the point of you showing there is no God in response to me saying there is no God. Fine, you win. I agree with you that God doesn't exist.1st Apparition:...Oh look, a random guy, Indian convert. Exactly what I said. Copying and pasting the entire article makes you look like an idiot. It clearly says that an Indian convert is responsible for making up this whole story. That shows it has nothing to do with Christianity.2nd ApparitionOoh, a bishop is involved, whoop dee doo.3rd Apparition and onI fail to see the point of this.Please stop making a fool of yourself and learn how to do research. Your words of denials hurts me more than you thinkYour nonsense is amusing to me, haha. You found a website that is garbage and think you have done research. All you do is keep pointing to it. It's great. I can't wait for the next bit of rubbish I hear from you. It will be such a great laugh.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

You are way better. Hey look, something unexplained, therefore a God created the universe. I don't think you should judge anyone.You all say that if it can be explained, God does not exist. Now that your in the face of something unexplainable, you still say the same thingUnder this logic I ask, what can you accept as a proof of God?This doesn't make sense. M Theory leads people to Atheism. You admitted yourself that you have no reason to believe God has anything to do with M Theory. I don't understand the point of you showing there is no God in response to me saying there is no God. Fine, you win. I agree with you that God doesn't exist.I simply debunked your failed scientific guess of how the universe came to be and provided you with REAL informations. I did it because I was hoping you can give me a good argument.Its a shame you cannot understand it, let alone use it against me. But I guess wisdom chooses its own master.Oh look, a random guy, Indian convert. Exactly what I said. Copying and pasting the entire article makes you look like an idiot. It clearly says that an Indian convert is responsible for making up this whole story. That shows it has nothing to do with Christianity.Ooh, a bishop is involved, whoop dee doo.I fail to see the point of this.sighFirst off, you were the one who asked for me to qoute the whole article. Which makes you "stupider", I guessSecond, why do you have to force an insult when you can just admit that you did not read it?Your nonsense is amusing to me, haha. You found a website that is garbage and think you have done research. All you do is keep pointing to it. It's great. I can't wait for the next bit of rubbish I hear from you. It will be such a great laugh.Flamewars do not amuse me. But if you dont mind, I would like to press on the fact that despite how you lost 3/5 arguments already, you chose the way of the fool.Denials and Aggression is a psychological defense and you have my pity. :)
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

You all say that if it can be explained, God does not exist. Now that your in the face of something unexplainable, you still say the same thingUnder this logic I ask, what can you accept as a proof of God?First off, you have something unexplained. Throughout history we have had tons of stuff that was once unexplained and now is not. Could be the same for this case. Second off, you have no actual idea of what is really responsible. You just say it is unexplained, therefore it must be supernatural. The problem with this is you actually don't have any idea if it is supernatural, paranormal, aliens. You have only ruled out explained. Lastly, you want to say that if Guadalupe exists that means there is a God that created the universe. It is completely ridiculous to make that assertion. I simply debunked your failed scientific guess of how the universe came to be and provided you with REAL informations. I did it because I was hoping you can give me a good argument.No you didn't, you said you believe in a theory that says God does not exist.Its a shame you cannot understand it, let alone use it against me. But I guess wisdom chooses its own master.You don't understand science. You can't just say that because scientific knowledge is updated that God exists. The idea of God doesn't ever change and we see more and more that idea is wrong. Maybe you guys should jump on the updating bandwagon.First off, you were the one who asked for me to qoute the whole article. Which makes you "stupider", I guessGeez, you are retarded if that's what you got from that. Second, why do you have to force an insult when you can just admit that you did not read it?Why do you have to sigh instead of admitting that you don't know how it applies to the argument.Flamewars do not amuse me. But if you dont mind, I would like to press on the fact that despite how you lost 3/5 arguments already, you chose the way of the fool.You can't count. You have won 0 arguments. In fact your own arguments are proof that your other arguments are wrong.Denials and Aggression is a psychological defense and you have my pity. :)You don't believe in science you psycho. That's the ultimate denial. Man, you are hilarious.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

First off, you have something unexplained. Throughout history we have had tons of stuff that was once unexplained and now is not. Could be the same for this case.Aye, but we have little unexplained things that relates itself in favor of a certain belief.Second off, you have no actual idea of what is really responsible. You just say it is unexplained, therefore it must be supernatural. The problem with this is you actually don't have any idea if it is supernatural, paranormal, aliens. You have only ruled out explained.Oh, so are you saying that the Guadalupe was made by aliens?Lastly, you want to say that if Guadalupe exists that means there is a God that created the universe. It is completely ridiculous to make that assertion.Can you prove im wrong?No you didn't, you said you believe in a theory that says God does not exist.You don't understand science. You can't just say that because scientific knowledge is updated that God exists. The idea of God doesn't ever change and we see more and more that idea is wrong. Maybe you guys should jump on the updating bandwagon.Wise always doubt, the fool is always surePlease dont call your theories as science when you cannot provide any findings that supports it. Much less disputes mineGeez, you are retarded if that's what you got from that.You said: "Quote it or shut up"And I beat you in your own game. Please be a sportWhy do you have to sigh instead of admitting that you don't know how it applies to the argument.Sighing is a nonverbal communication used mostly in a feminine wayYou can't count. You have won 0 arguments. In fact your own arguments are proof that your other arguments are wrong.You don't believe in science you psycho. That's the ultimate denial. Man, you are hilarious.Oh dear did I hit a nerve? Dont worry though, I wont stoop down to your level
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Aye, but we have little unexplained things that relates itself in favor of a certain belief.You are exactly right. There are so few unexplained things that it lends itself to a certain belief. Oh, so are you saying that the Guadalupe was made by aliens?Can you prove me wrong? ;)Can you prove im wrong?Sure. Your only reason for thinking it is God is that you say it is God..So, I say it is not and I have just as much proof as you.Wise always doubt, the fool is always sureHehe. You are the one who is sure that God created the universe and Guadalupe. I am voicing my doubt. You are so hilarious.Please dont call your theories as science when you cannot provide any findings that supports it. Much less disputes mineYou provided the evidence that your own idea is wrong. I didn't do anything. You claim to think that God exists and also claim that M Theory is right and that God doesn't exist.You said: "Quote it or shut up"And I beat you in your own game. Please be a sportThat's funny. I didn't realize that you were dumb enough to equate quoting and completely copying the whole thing. And, you still don't think you did anything wrong. I am telling you that what you posted shows that you are wrong. I read it. Which part of it shows you are right?Sighing is a nonverbal communication used mostly in a feminine wayDoesn't mean that you should be doing it instead of providing evidence.Oh dear did I hit a nerve? Dont worry though, I wont stoop down to your levelIt is funny how I am losing yet you have not provided one bit of argument to combat my statements. If we were on a level playing field I would not have lost once. But you live in the Twilight zone where you think that if you don't understand the response that means that your argument is valid and you don't have to provide anything to counter the other persons argument.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Can you prove me wrong?The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.Sure. Your only reason for thinking it is God is that you say it is God..So, I say it is not and I have just as much proof as you.Nope, because my articles are backed by scientific findings made by real scientist.Hehe. You are the one who is sure that God created the universe and Guadalupe. I am voicing my doubt. You are so hilarious.The voice of doubt isnt an evidence.You provided the evidence that your own idea is wrong. I didn't do anything. You claim to think that God exists and also claim that M Theory is right and that God doesn't exist.I repeat, I simply tried to strengthen your reasons. Shame that you failed. But I guess ignorance is a choiceThat's funny. I didn't realize that you were dumb enough to equate quoting and completely copying the whole thing.sighI gave what you asked. You reap what you sow.It is funny how I am losing yet you have not provided one bit of argument to combat my statements. If we were on a level playing field I would not have lost once. But you live in the Twilight zone where you think that if you don't understand the response that means that your argument is valid and you don't have to provide anything to counter the other persons argument.We are not in a flamewar. The fact that you admitted defeat is the only thing that matters. Thankyou for the time.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.You are absolutely out of your mind. I quoted you word for word. This is what you keep telling me over and over again and that is your only response. It is great.Nope, because my articles are backed by scientific findings made by real scientist.Hehe, You have no idea how science works. Science tells you that it can't explain Guadalupe. It does not provide any evidence that God exists.The voice of doubt isnt an evidence.Your voice of non doubt is not evidence either. Plus, you just got through saying how the wise have doubts. Now you are insulting my doubts. Hehe.I repeat, I simply tried to strengthen your reasons. Shame that you failed. But I guess ignorance is a choiceI am trying to weaken your arguments. And you have 0 strength. In fact you are saying you don't even believe your own beliefs. Why do I need to do any more work? You are already on my side.I gave what you asked. You reap what you sow.I already demonstrated that what you "quoted" was not supporting what you said. I was trying to explain to you that if your source doesn't support your argument you need to point to the exact part that does support you. When I read that article it says that Guadalupe is attributable to a random Indian guy. Therefore, not really part of the religion.The fact that you admitted defeat is the only thing that matters.True. Since I never admitted defeat and you constantly point out how you are wrong, I have won. Thanks.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

You are absolutely out of your mind. I quoted you word for word. Can you qoute it again?You have no idea how science works. Science tells you that it can't explain Guadalupe. It does not provide any evidence that God exists.Science and History says otherwiseYour voice of non doubt is not evidence either. Plus, you just got through saying how the wise have doubts. Now you are insulting my doubts.Nope, you do not doubt. You deny.I am trying to weaken your arguments. And you have 0 strength. In fact you are saying you don't even believe your own beliefs.Dont hang a bait. Just admit your faults and let go. Its easyI already demonstrated that what you "quoted" was not supporting what you said. In what way?When I read that article it says that Guadalupe is attributable to a random Indian guy. Therefore, not really part of the religion.Why do you have to pretend that you read it?True. Since I never admitted defeat and you constantly point out how you are wrong, I have won. Thanks."It is funny how I am losing"-Cartman