azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

hence will you say universe,galaxies,sun,day and night evolution are just a false because it is a human concept
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: SCIENCE

That's not even remotely close to what he said. Science is a generalised concept to encapsulate many individual entities. He's right in saying that "science" itself didn't create the earth; it was a process that occured which we encapsulate within the concept of science. The big bang occured, which led to the eventual creation of the universe. The big bang is a scientific theory. So, one of the scientific theories led to the earth's creation, not science itself.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

SO WHAT DO YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE WITH................. SCIENCE OR GOD??????????
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

I'm a lady, but thank you for the defense! You summarized it perfectly; When we decided upon the word "blue", we didn't cause the sky to become a color, we merely described it; science is how we describe our world, not the nature or the cause of it. We created science; we did not create the world.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: SCIENCE

As a Physicists I'm fairly sure, and as dictionary.com defines it...Science: A branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws.So the laws of Physics created the Universe and a study of these laws is Physical science. Really a moot point at this stage though.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

In social science, a social relation or social interaction refers to a relationship between two (i.e. a dyad), three (i.e. a triad) or more individuals (e.g. a social group).
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

i think its science which has created the world............science has created all the comforts for us and there is evidence that it is the creator and still if we say god is the creator then it is foolishness as it is just an imaginary figure......
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Science makes my cars go, and my computer run.Science cures disease and prolongs life.Science explains natural phenomena.Science gives reason to the otherwise reasonless.Science has created prosthetics for people who have lost limbs.Science has done so much it's disturbingly awesome.God has done... uh... well, I don't know how to answer that.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Science: monotheism is a dated kind of thinking. One cannot fully integrate something like this into their life because of the way society is setup now. During the time when Jerusalem was in full bloom, no one had technology or many forms of entertainment like we do today. Science explains that there are many concrete and logical reasons for things, which paints a clear picture of the world around them to those who prefer it. Although a modern religion is somewhat important, it is also equally important for people to realize that they cannot dominate their lives with such things. Many liberals and "new-age" people prefer to use the term agnostic to show their appreciation of God and the world around them. This kind of thinking is probably the closest we will come to full integration of Science and God today.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

darwin is clearly right theres to much evidence on his side
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

science has discoverd things like fossiles of early humans and apes proving evoulition plus if you look at older pictures of some animals they have changed
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

religion without science is blind.science without religion is lame.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I like to believe the big bang theory, of about how the Earth was created from rocks and other materials then compacted to form the round shape it has today, not the religous belief in bibles of about how God created Earth from DUST.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

God is a guess.Science is an educated guess.Both can be equally wrong at any point in time, but science is still more thoughtful.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: SCIENCE

Since nobody can answer either question, what made the Higgs Boson particle and what made god, we can only keep searching for answers.It doesnt matter if every search and every experiment and finding that science does is worthless or not, I dont need a Higgs Boson, or a any bosons to know that all knowing, all powerful and all loving creators arent likely to be homophobic sexist bullies!The consensus is some god is our father, what if science was called a father too.One is here everyday making our lives better thru technology, and one is a dead beat no show father who is playing Annie with his tomorrow, tommorrow, I’ll see ya tomorrow routine!The SAD consensus is, No, not zeus or aphrodite, but a homophobic sexist who threatens punishment if you dont believe and kiss his up to him!DevientGenie 7:72–Thou can tripith and fall in any squasre mile in this country and hit the ground where a religious claiming pedophile hath walked before.I’d like to give a Big Higgs Boson shout out to Science….WE LOVE YOU….Thank You for proving your points without crucifing anyone!Also a big thanks to our sponsors, Check and Mate!SCIENCE WINS! (Now Say It Like Raden in Mortal Combat)
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

SCIENCE SHOULD NOT OPPOSE GOD AND RELIGION SHOULD NOT REJECT SCIENCE UNLESS THE RELIGION IS FAKE BECAUSE SCIENCE IS ONLY UNVEILING AND EXPLAINING COMPLEX WORKS OF NATURE  IF YOUR SCRIPTURE DOES NOT STAND SCIENCE IT ONLY MEANS YOUR BOOK IS FICTION THEREFORE YOU CAN CREATE SCIENCE FICTION BOOK TO SUPPORT YOUR SCRIPTS.ISLAM DOES NOT REJECT SCIENCE QURAN HAS STOOD SCIENCE TEST QURAN HAS BEEN PROVEN BY SCIENTISTS TO BE FROM GODQURAN YOUR ONLY WAY OUT OF THIS MESS.EVERY ONE SHALL CONSIDER IT IF YOU ARE REASONABLE IF NOT STAY STUBORN AND OBSTINATE WE'LL C YOUR DESTINITY.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: SCIENCE

"QURAN HAS BEEN PROVEN BY SCIENTISTS TO BE FROM GOD"Really? Where's the proof?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Both

Why do people assume God uses some kind of magic? Don't you think that if there was a God, he would know more about science than we do? Just saying. ..
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

At least one person in this debate is seeing when they look...We're not here to test the validity of either, independently of the other. The parameters of the debate are set. Consider what is known about God and compare it to what is known about Science. Step one is whether or not God (if it does exist) could create a universe... Yes, because it's all powerful, all knowing, etc... and whether science could create a universe... SCIENCE IS A METHOD, NOT A THING THAT CAN CREATE!!! So, JakeJ is finally saying something that makes sense. ;P
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Both

Why thank you. (8Actually I always make sense, and you are finally realizing that. ;p Okay so maybe not. But it's more fare to say that I'm finally saying something that you agree with.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Even if I didn't believe in God I wouldn't think that science created the world.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Man is god, science is just a tool for studying man.Therefor, God > Science.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

i say that it is the big bang theory that created the world
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

"i say that it was the big bang  theory that created the world"Who created the theory?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

LOL''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Just because someone was able to make observations and come up with a theory doesn't mean that person is responsible for the actions that occurred.The Big Bang would have happened regardless of whether or not someone thought of it.I'm not really sure I like this debate at all though, because it's intended to pit religion against science, and this usually tends to hurt our society because people view certain scientific theories as somehow in opposition to religion (a.k.a. big bang theory, or evolution) when in reality they have nothing to do with each other.However, as far as ideas go, the scientific method has advanced us much further than a society then our beliefs in God(s).
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Both

The Big Bang would have happened regardless of whether or not someone thought of it.I think that was the point he was making. Because they said the theory created the earth. I thought he was just mocking them, was I wrong?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

No you're right.The person he was arguing against was trying to argue that science created the universe, when it's nature that causes things to happen and science that describes these natural phenomenon.On this point I agree with bradf0rd, but for the sake of argument I wanted to challenge him on a different point.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I have an interesting and serious question for you:If a big bang happens and nothing is around to witness it, was it really big and did it really bang?---WTF--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "However, as far as ideas go, the scientific method has advanced us much further than a society then our beliefs in God(s).">>the scientific method has advanced us>>much further than a society>>then our beliefs>>in God(s).O_O----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

I have a serious and uninteresting answer for you:Considering the fact that it created the whole universe, and is still going on today... yes you could say it was big.And considering the term big bang is a misnomer, and what really happened was an expansion (which as I said can still be observed) then no it didn't expand.In addition, whether we can observe it directly or not, we are still feeling the its effects and therefore it definitely occurred. Even if we couldn't observe it though (directly or indirectly) it still would have happened because the laws of nature do not stop working just because no one is watching.Do you disagree with my assertion about the scientific method's superiority over a belief in god?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Edwin Hubble, George Gammow, Kunal Nayar, Fred Hoyle. Just to name a few.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

of course science.........................................
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

If science is a tool for man to study man, and you already said man is god, then science is studying god. Science supports evolutionary theory. Science cannot support both because they are opposing forces. Making science hypocritical. New content is discovered and created in science daily. whereas the bible hasn't been revised or edited in nearly 2000 years. making the bible obsolete and outdated. God killed roughly 1800 people in the bible compared to the devil which allegedly killed 3.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

No, Science isn't a person, or a thing that does something, science, like I've said, is nothing more than a tool. It's a function of the human mind, in other words.  The human mind supports evolution via a function. "New" content is found via a function of the mind. The Bible was also a human invention. Hence, man is god. The Bible is less outdated than the last scientific theory because the Bible isn't a theory, it's a book. People may take it as a theory, sure, but that doesn't mean it is one... does it?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

It all comes down to personal opinion. I think god is a theory and you dont oh well. science has many theories but god only has one. "You shalt worship no other god"closed minded. whereas science can bend and flex to any theory or idea.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Fundamental enquiries into the nature of social relations are to be found in the work of the classical sociologists, for instance, in Max Weber's theory of social action.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Anthropology is the study of man. Science is the study of nature, the world around us, and the laws that govern them.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Me: "Man is god, science is just a tool for studying man."You: "Anthropology is the study of man. Science is the study of nature, the world around us, and the laws that govern them" Anthropology is what, an art? No, it's a science. When I say that science is a tool for studying man this includes anthropology. There is no conflict. Science can only explain to man what is in man's capacity to know. It is man explaining the universe, not science.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I believe God created the world as we know it and that science can try to explain it from varying viewpoints if one is not a believer in God.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

I would say that science explains the world a little better than than the bible does. Now I know that that may be a matter of opinion, but I'm sure that most rational people would agree.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

so you say you are not a believer of science.....................
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Belief is great, but this is a debate site. Debate entails offering arguments supported by evidence. You seem to suggest that one cannot be a believer in science and god at the same time. Any support for this?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I think the universe exists, and if it was created out of nothing, it was God. And even if it wasn't, it still might be.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

a man create life in a test tube so do you agree man is god
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

well, unbeliever people just looking for logical explanations about the topics which are related with god. But they usually cant find. Galaxy is very very big system in which everything working very balanced(regulated). Even in the world is everything very good balanced. And who did regulate everything ? in my opinion :Of course there is a god! ..
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

god has created the world .god only created us,and inturn we created science we should be thankful to him ,if we don't then it's clear that we are selfish. who knows even you can die this moment at that tin=me you pry to god please save me. so god,god,god.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

You have no evidence to back that up. This is a debate. Your opinion is not what's important here.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

GoD is just an IMAGINARY FIGURE CREATED BY THE HUMANS..............it is utter foolishness to say god created science and uswe should not be thankful to him ,if we don't then it's clear that we are GOOD IN IMAGINATION
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

God is the Creators... Science is a way for us to learn, or maybe a tools to create. well that was what I'm thinking right now :D
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I believe that God created science to get a more precise view in life, but people believe that they can prove that he doesn't exist because of atoms and cells, isn't it easy to say that that is what God created for us to understand. He is not just gonna give us an easy trip to the mountain, we ourselves have to climb it in order to enjoy our success. What I mean by that is that most likely God would not wish to declare that he is real but allow us to believe and discover on our own and to put our faith in him.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

though I don't fully believe in god, I think it is him who has created our world. and science came up only after god/the creator created man.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

God is not a person, who sits else where and rule universe. he is available to us in invisible astro physical forces. they are eternal. science is a small tool to prove certain manipulations like gravity. science came into existence recently . no god means know god
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

God, obviously .
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

God can kick Science's ass any day of the week. For starters, He can change the entire physics of the universe and science would be like screwed ;)
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Science has helped and hurt us throughout the years, but eventually man-kind is going to come across something they can't explain, if they haven't already.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: GOD

Science is fake because you cant make nothing out of something its impossible to make even 1 .
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Well if we're going to be anal, I believe science created the world as we know it and still governs it.HOWEVER, I believe God sparked the Big Bang and thus created science and time! ;)
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: GOD

I wish more Christians would be as rational as you. In no way should science be thought of as hostile to religion, and those Christians who reject science in because they can't understand the idea of metaphors, are doing a disservice to the entire world by standing in the way of knowledge.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Both

Because most Christians are not rational? I have been saying almost exactly what he said for some time now, and I hear no compliments from you. Quite the opposite actually. Maybe you just don't like me. (;
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: GOD

Because most Christians are not rational?That's not what I'm saying at all. Something like 40% of the people in the U.S. think that the earth is about 6,000 years old (because apparently that's what the Bible says).I have been saying almost exactly what he said for some time now, and I hear no compliments from you. Quite the opposite actually. Maybe you just don't like me. (;Have you changed your views in the last couple months?You are a creationist, are you not?Creationism is totally irrational, and harmful to society in that it undermines science.Also, you do occasionally make points that I agree with, and when I see them I don't hesitate to upvote you.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Both

I haven't changed my views. I believe like he said about God and the big bang theory. That theory is undeniable because everything in the solar system is moving apart and had to start together. That doesn't contradict my belief that god created the world.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: GOD

But do you believe that he created it out of nowhere or through natural methods that we can study?For example when scientists study the creation of the solar system, part of that has to do with the creation of planets, and how heavy matter orbiting around the sun came together to form objects that are now either planets or moons.Does your belief in God interfere with your ability to accept the validity of their research in this respect?Or how about the age of the universe, and the age of the earth itself, which has been determined through numerous different sources to be just over 4 billion years old?How about the diversity of life?Do you think that god created people and animals from nothing and put them on the earth, or that through natural processes we evolved from simpler organisms into what we are today?I'm sorry for giving you all these questions about your beliefs, but I need to understand to what degree your religion influences your ideas of science.Many people in this country reject those theories and scientific ideas that have to do with our origins because they feel that the conclusions based on the available evidence contradict the Bible. Sometimes these people will go through a lot of trouble to discredit science in these fields because of their religious beliefs, and more often than not they are dishonest in their attacks.So here is the basic question I am getting at: do you think that God actively has interfered with our creation, or that he is more like a watchmaker that created the universe and then tweaked here and there?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Both

So here is the basic question I am getting at: do you think that God actively has interfered with our creation, or that he is more like a watchmaker that created the universe and then tweaked here and there?We don't think God said poof with a magic wand. We believe that he used elements that where already there. Does that answer the question? I just had almost the same discussion with David. As for the age of the earth and the evolution of animals I'm not sure, not that I don't care to learn, I do. I stand by all of the beliefs of my religion because I have a true testimony of it and it's very important to me. That is not something most people understand. Most people just don't believe that you can know anything for sure spiritually, but I do.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Social relations, derived from individual agency, form the basis of the social structure. To this extent social relations are always the basic object of analysis for social scientists.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

God sparked the Big Bang and thus created science and time..so where has the god gone now.....when the whole world is dying slowly.....
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Would you enjoy life if every minute detail to it was controlled by someone else? That would mean you don't have free will.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

this ....... is ......... crazy................
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

If you were to believe in God and the bible you would know that God is here and still is, but if the world is dying it doesn't matter, because the afterlife is what is important. Your statement doesn't add anything to the argument anyhow
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

If you were to believe in God and the bible you would know that God is here and still is, but if the world is dying it doesn't matter, because the afterlife is what is important. That's why religion can be a cancer to humanity, it deludes people into inaction when the world dies around them.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

the problem with that theory is that the bible, your one source of evidence, doesn't state that it happened that way. There is no explosion described in the bible. There is no explanation in the bible for an expanding universe. In the bible, humans did not evolve, they were created as is in gods image. Seems that you don't agree with your holy source of evidence?
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I see no problem in my beliefs because I don't take the Bible as a literal history of the Earth and everything. Most of it is just stories and allegories.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

There could be a force undefined by science which know as god.I support this as there is know science reasoning that has been proved so far.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

Everything in this world or universe has a creator. The fact remains that scientist are humans which are not guaranteed 100%. This means that they can make errors or even make something up because of human nature. Yes, things get tested over and over, but nothing is 100%. Too many things in this world to explain so I believe there is a creator. Look at medicine, it helps people yet many makers of medication are being sued because medicine is not guaranteed 100%.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: Science

Everything has a creator? Great, who or what created your god then? We can all agree that the bible was written by humans, and yet you suggest that because something is created by humans, it can be just made up. Exactly. The bible can be made up. You attack the very advances in medicine that have most likely contributed to your life in countless time. Scientific advances in medicine have allowed us to live longer, healthier lives AS A SPECIES.
Debate: GOD vs SCIENCE
Side: God

I think you are missing his point. Something perfect does not need a creator. Medicine isn't perfect Man made medicine. Man Isn't perfect God made Man. God is perfect and always was.