Debate: 9/11 was an inside job.
Side: Obviously...Wake up, America!

"By molten steal are you referring to those trusses and beams that had diagonal cuts and were allegedly proof of theremite?"No. Im referring to the video of orange/ yellow molten iron/ steel pouring from the towers before collapse and the firefighters who claimed it was "flowing like lava" among several other documented eyewitesses. All this and more can be found in the 2 hour presentation by gage at 911blogger.com/node/10025."As for WTC7 and why it lands in its foot print: WTC7 had extensive fire damage and therefore its entire structural integrity was compromised."There is no evidence to support this assertion. I challenge you to demonstrate there was any damage whatsoever to the north side of WTC7, with the exception of standard hydrocarbon fires incapable of weakening steel on the bottom 15 floors. Standard fuel fires do NOT melt steel, and this is the ONLY way to eliminate ALL of the resistance to collapse and produce the free fall collapses seen in all of the videos.-------"(which rescue workers were well aware it was going to do 20 minutes ahead of time: hence the "we pulled" and the 20 minute prescient news report) "Workers were told to start moving away from WTC7 HOURS before. And a collapse like this has NEVER occured before without preplanted explosives. They knew because they were told by someone who knew the building was rigged to blow.Cite an example where one of these firefighters might have seen a steel framed high rise collapse at free fall speeds due to standard office/ hydrocarbon fires.---The south side, it's true, had the bulk of the damage mainly from falling debris, once it failed it, like the towers, fell into its foot print through a domino effect succession.A domino effect succession would can not explain the free fall speeds. A complete lack of resistance (or "domino impacts", if you like) is necessary to achieve free fall acceleration.Further, uneven damage leads, if there is to be a collapse at all, to an uneven collapse, in this case a collapse to the south. That was not witnessed. It was a perfectly vertical free fall collapse. which takes systematic planning. Even the slightest mistake in planning leaves some of the structure in place and causes toppling, NOT free fall.-----"In truth, though the south side was badly damaged, fire raged for a long time through practically the whole building."No it didn't, the top 2/3 of the north face of the building showed NO evidence of fires or fire damage.Even if it had, this wouldn't explain the absence of resistance and molten metal witnessed later, because standard hydrocarbon fires don't produce the heat necessary to melt the steel frames, which is the only way to eliminate ALL of the resistance.---This is predicated not only on video evidence and professional testimony,Provide links to the video evidence showing the evidence of fire damage througout WTC7. Include the fire damage in the top 2/3 of the northern half of the buildings.---but also several computer models done by NIST and independent enterprises, including the discovery channels "Conspiracy Files" show.The conspiracy files is a show by the BBC, an organisation managed by UK government appointees and regulated and funded and controlled by the UK government.Most of the simulations you cite are performed by US unversities heavily dependent on Pentagon/US government funding for research.NIST stopped its investigations at "collapse initiation", didn't explain the rest of the collapse, and still hasn't come close to an explanation on WTC7. They never will. Basic physics demonstrates they are lying. Kevin Ryan debunks their report in far more detail than I do here.Occams Razor is not a serious forensics tool. It is usually applied pseudoscientifically by those without enough time to give serious issues the attention they deserve.The seriousness of your response demonstrates you are considering this carefully. Please don't stop thinking about it. You aren't far from realising the story you have been sold is a stack of lies.watch 911blogger.com/node/10025 and www.911blogger.com/node/15793and even more importantly keep your eye focussed very hard on basic physical principles like "free fall", the melting point of structural steel, and angular momentum (which should have been seen in the WTC7 collapse, but wasn't.)This is all assuming that you actually WANT to realise your government sees you as little more than a slave, to be killed at a time of their choosing. Some people don't want to realise just how tyrannical the US government is and will do anything to maintain their delusions.