Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

Every quote you had of me clearly shows you misrepresented what I said on this portion of the debate. This time you just assert it without any quotes so I am not left with anything to defend against but an assertion. You failed to back up your statement, defend it nor admit you were mistaken...just claim you are right when all else fails.Hey, didn't I say you would do that...Your two links are to the same post. My links showed an additional 10% difference though when the wording changes. In my last post I said you would probably skip my evidence of this...and you did. That is two things in a row I predicted you would do. I can predict the future!! Proof of the supernatural!! Or your behavior is predictable based on evidence from the past. You avoid talking about the GuadalupeWhat about it? It is just a painting. You begin by explaining something by what it is not by what it isn't. It makes no logical sense to start describing a person for instance by saying, they are not a pineapple, they are not a rock, they are not a dog. You begin with what they are.You corrupted the our argument into a worthless flamewarYou mean by asking you to back up a comment you said I said, then you failed to show I said it. Every instance you claimed supports your claim actually doesn't as I shown. You kept tacking things onto another claim. If I say I like pepsi it doesn't mean I like coke. According to your logic it does though. If I say evolution doesn't need a god to explain how it works you say that is me claiming there is no god. Me doubting the painting is a miracle is me saying there is no god by your logic.After all this you say I am to blame for the flame war...but no blame to yourself.Now thats childish, obviously we both share that burden but you seem to not claim any fault.Stop lying about your goodbyes. It is good as a joke, but it has overstayed its welcomeIt is the only way you will address anything I say is when you think you don't have to fear a rebuttal. Seems you are keen on my trick now though.Don't like me debating in this style? I don't like you debating by lying about my actual position. I been asking you to not strawman me but you continue long past me showing where you have done it, long after you failed to provide evidence of your claim. I think I will keep doing my goodbyes in the same fashion.Really though nothing will change your mind. You say I am in denial? We both know what was said, it is written above all this. Your theatrics must be for an audience because you can't fool me on what I said and vice versa. Anyone who reads our exchanges critically though will see your claims seem to fall short where you straw man my position, heck others have called you out on this when you were dealing with them. You have a reputation. Well your internet persona does.Hell I know I am blunt and a bit jerky at times. No denial here. I just do it to people who try to get one by me. I call them on it.Again if you are to hold a belief I believe it must be on solid information which means you should not misrepresent your opponents stances. I am guessing we are here for different reasons though, yours is not to explore an idea but to pad your beliefs with evidence that only supports it. Otherwise why would you misrepresent someones stance? That must be your tactic for the audience too, hoping they are too lazy to read what was written. I will give you this though, you are probably right. Probably why you continue it.You are starting to bore me so I will take off now this time. Really!buh by.