azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Wikipedia is never a reliable source. For snowflakes and ignorants, it would suffice them but they know nothing other than blindly believing it is helpful when it is not. Your argument is invalid because you seem offended by the truth. The March of Truth continues. "sciencerules" has failed to convince the audience otherwise. Wikipedia is 100% unreliable, unuseful and relies on opinion rather than pure facts.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Pro choicers are hypocrites and snowflakes. Just because people defend the lives of babies, pro choicers scream about it. "Sciencerules" has lost this debate from day 1. I speak the absolute objective truths. Zero evidence has been presented by the toxic hypocritical snowflake who supports anti human pedophile rights, racism and sexism while also being anti science but doesn't defend the lives of babies. Under false pretenses, "sciencerules" is certified as a failure in life and will be suspended permanently from society. Sentence is for life and the POTUS will overrule any leftist toxic activists 100%. Case is closed, court adjourned.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Choice

Again with the endless ad homiems and strawman attacks. First, your position conflates infants and fetuses. Even the most hardcore pro-choice is against abortion after a certain number of months. Let alone after child birth.That's why your slogan of babies lives matter would make more sense if it said fetus lives matter, FLM. Your position seems to be that life begins at conception. Well, often times implantation fails. "Conception does not always lead to pregnancy. A person is technically not pregnant until implantation has occurred. This is the moment when the fertilized egg implants into the lining of a uterus, which occurs around 5–6 days after fertilization.Not all fertilized eggs get to this stage. An estimated 50% of all fertilized eggs do not implant and leave the body the same way as unfertilized eggs do — during menstruation." Are you really going to dig a grave for the 6 day old fertilized egg? Is that really murder in your view the 50% of the time the fertilized egg does not implant?
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Again with your hypocritical nonsense. Your arguments are once again invalidated. I can go all day on how wrong you are. I will continue the march of truth against your subjective toxicity. You are declared a sexist manhater. Cry me a river and get over it snowfalke.Pro choice claim it's "my body my choice", however, they do not understand what choice means right? Choice means you have options. Not one but two. That's why pro lifers make sense and pro choice doesn't. Pro choicers all scream, "MY BODY MY CHOICE" AND THEN CLAIM THEY ARE FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS. Yet have you ever thought about asking a real woman what she wants to do if she is pregnant? Yeah. If you aren't a woman who is pregnant but are a woman regardless in a relationship with a man or if you are a man who isn't in a relationship with a woman, especially in a marriage, THAN DON'T GET INVOLVED. You pro abortionists claim you are for women's rights, yet you don't let pro lifers speak up eh? That's your hypocrisy and I will continue to argue common sense because pro lifers are common sense. Abortion is murder. Fetuses are living. They develop over 9 months. Baby lives matter. Ask real mothers who have seemingly gone through abortions. Pro abortionists may claim they care but they never will because they think baby lives do not matter. All you pro abortionists do is you want to have sex and than you don't take responsibility for the baby. Give it a rest, take responsibility AND THEN YOU WON'T HAVE A PROBLEM. But do you listen? Nope. That's why, pro abortionists are not common sense. They are child murderers with no morality. Anyone as much as lifts a finger, you will be shot down by the truth and only the truth.I can define strawman argument to you:Arguments that hold no benefit or has weak supporting evidence. That defines your subjectiveness to a nutshell 100%Your hypocrisy is exposed again. Knocks out "Sciencerules" for his strawman hypocritical comments and puts him in Arkham Asylum for life.It is hilarious to see you trip over your own words. I use facts. You don't. Pro lifers are pro science for your information. You are beyond strawman. You are a low IQ braindead fool.Baby lives matter and that is the truth. Your weak strawman tactics have already been debunked 100%. I will continue to do this until you disappear because you will.The risks of Abortion:https://www.compasscare.info/health-information/abortion/abortion-risks-and-side-effects/
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Scientific Facts about how a fetus is living: https://www.mccl.org/post/2017/12/20/the-unborn-is-a-human-being-what-science-tells-us-about-unborn-children It may not be developed to the fullest. Does that mean you may justify it to die? No.End of another chapter.
Debate: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice
Side: Pro-Life

Ben Shapiro is more sensible than you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmtsDxktx68&t=1s Do you hate Jews? Yes? "Sciencerules" is now known as an anti semitic snowflake. What a hypocrite. Even I know, the Jewish are humans and they deserve to live.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

My first thought whenever the topic of Pro-Choice versus Pro-Life comes up, is that it's not a debate. Something that is so highly emotional and so personal. Something where each and every instance of it coming into play (any unwanted pregnancy) is so drastically different each time. The idea of there being one yes or no answer to this question seems archaic. Which is why it's called pro-choice, not pro-abortion. Abortion is never a good thing, no one is happy to have one. But the choice is sometimes the only choice for some people, for others its not. The fact of the matter is, it doesn't matter, as long as the choice is that persons to make, and that person alone. Not some judge, not some republican, and not some small town mayor from Alaska.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

I'm not sure that Palin would or could force women to go full term.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

She (or McCain) could pass laws ordering the arrest of doctors that give abortions. In fact, that's probably what they'll do.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

Are you serious? That's political suicide. And they wont get anything out of it. I tell you what. Lets have a standing bet that if McCain and Palin win and they pass laws (within 4 years of being elected) ordering the arrest of doctors that give abortions, then you win. You'll have to decide what you want though. Maybe I can write a debate claiming you to be the world's greatest debater or the one with the most foresight ever, or something. Deal?
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

It wouldn't be political suicide -- there are a lot of pro-life people out there. Also, McCain himself has said that's what he would do:From http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain_Abortion.htm "If Roe v. Wade is overturned and abortion outlawed, McCain said he believes doctors who performed abortions would be prosecuted. 'But I would not prosecute a woman' who obtained an abortion."As for the bet, well, if McCain or Palin outlaw abortion, I'll be happy if you just say to yourself, "Wow, Jesse was right. I should listen to him more often."
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

I accept the conditions of the wager. Now if I win, I'll be happy if you just say to yourself, "GD that JC! I hate it when he's right." ;)You know, if (and this is a Giant IF) Roe v. Wade is overturned and abortion outlawed, then (by definition) doctors who performed abortions would be prosecuted. Anyone who breaks the law is prosecuted. McCain just stated an obvious fact.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Deal. :)From the same source:A spokesman said that McCain "has a 17-year voting record of supporting efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade. He does that currently, and will continue to do that as president.”Though McCain has gone back and forth on this issue, his current stance is that Roe v. Wade should be overturned.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

He can't overturn Roe vs. Wade on his own and I don't think there's enough votes out there for him to succeed.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

First, he could appoint justices to the Supreme Court that would overturn it.Second, Roe v. Wade states that abortion is protected by the Constitution. Thus, McCain could amend the Constitution and render Roe v. Wade null and void. Once again, this is something he has said he would do.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

I think he would have an up hill battle if he tried to pull that off. Remember, this race is going to be close. He's not going to have a "mandate" and he's going to have a hard time dealing with the pissed off Democratic Party.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

That's at the very least in the ball park of what they'll do. Palin has been VERY vocal about women not having the right to choose in the event of a rape. That would be forcing them to go to term...
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

'Could' and 'probably' are unsubstantiated claims. Where is your proof?
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Again, I agree 100% and couldn't have set it forth better myself. You've said what needed saying...even if everyone needs to be reminded of it from time to time.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Thanks, that's kinda what I was going to say when I saw the debate, probably not as well.And would ad that making abortions illegal does not and I'll repeat it does not, never has, and never will cut down on the number of abortions. All it does is force women into basements to get them performed by people who may or may not be doctors, and it increases the mortality rate for women a hundred times.So you have to ask yourself what really is the goal of the pro-life group? If no one is really saved, and infact more life is lost by making it illegal.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Let's look at the question logically.Pro-Choice fully supports Pro-Life.Pro-Life does not support the most important point behind Pro-Choice.This question is heavily debated, which indicates to me that people cannot decide who is right about the issue. Obviously, because it's a governmental issue, you support the idea that covers most people, and is less restrictive. Like I said, that would be Pro-Choice as it does not conflict with Pro-Life, and does not infringe on people's rights to make their own choices... why would a government unsure of who is right about the issue wish to enforce the more strict ideology? It makes perfect sense to allow people to make their own decisions about this. All of the Pro-Life people need to get used to sharing the nation with people who don't think the way they do... I'm looking at you GOP. 0_O
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Yeah, I agree. I'm "pro-life" but you're entitled to your decision. It's between you and your maker after that. The reason I'm pro-life is because I have 2 kids and I could have had 3. I made a choice and although it may have been the right choice at the time, I would like a do over.What I'm saying is that when I say I'm pro-life, I mean that I would try not to choice and abortion. I do not mean that I would force my views on others.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Yeah, most people are as agreeable about their beliefs, and by that I simply mean that they do as they please and, for the most part, leave others alone. It seems like there are a lot of people out there though, that are fighting to implement their philosophies on life, in other people... I say seems because there aren't that many in actuality. As soon as you have people that all believe in the same thing, and are speaking out against other people, and are organized, it starts to look like a bigger issue than it really is. i understand where you're coming from, I haven't formed an opinion about your opinions so you didn't need to explain yourself. I couldn't imagine having one kid, let alone two and an abortion. I am smart enough to keep myself from getting to the point in my life to where I need that choice, and I plan to keep it that way... but I also know that accidents do happen, and sometimes abortion may be the only reasonable choice.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

"...smart enough to keep myself from getting to the point in my life to where I need that choice..."Now, I am going to have to disagree with you on this statement. What about a woman who was raped? Is she not smart enough to keep her self out of this choice? That is just plain insensitive to think that all people who have abortions were just not smart enough to not get pregnant! (Sorry, I just needed to play Devil's Advocate on this one!) ;)
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Wow... that was very well said! I am coming into this debate late, and missed all of the fireworks, but your point says it all!
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Pro-Choice all the way. The last thing we need is more parents with unwanted children. While we are on the subject, Pro-Life shouldn't be called that. It should be called Anti-Abortion. Life is a much more general term that could be applied to war and capitol punishment.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

So if parents decide that they don't want children they should have a right to end their lives? What about parents whose children are already born? Sounds like the ends justify the means here. That the extinguishing of a life might lead to fewer "unwanted children" hardly justifies the intrinsic evil and relative gravity of this action.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

So, since you are pro-life, how many children have you adopted?
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Women deserve a choice Men like me and every other guy don't deserve to take that painful choice away from women. I don't believe anyone likes an abortion especially women. The reason they have them isn't because they want to see a baby die. There are hundreds of reasons why. Work, there damn lives, who the hell knows what else the point being its called pro-choice not pro-abortion.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Come on now, how are you going to force someone currently alive to ruin their life for a reason you can't understand. I'm pro choice because killing a fetus is no more wrong than killing a animal. They are alive only enough eat, sleep, and breathe. They are in fact more of a hassle at this point.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

well, i disagree with the idea of completely eliminating abortion. i mean, yes, it would protect the rights of the baby inside the mothers, but a stream of post menstrual feminazis will stop having sex with their husbands... and i can't allow this to happen to my fellow man.so i do support up to 3 months because at least the baby is unaware of it's death (thrown into a trashcan, shit like that), but i do support that fetus going into some kind of medical research so at least it's life was worth something... god, i'm so glad i wasn't aborted... imagine that, never existing? never doing what you did? i would never want that to happen... but once again, post menstrual feminazis... it's basically the greater good.hmm, what would have been interesting is if every person who currently supports abortion was aborted so they had never been able to continue that movement. funny thing to think about...
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

I really do hate the term "feminazis." Supporting women's rights should not be analogous to killing off thousands of people!
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

difference between feminazis and feminists. i guess though if you wanna ban "sexist" video games and think that the right to abortion is the same as the right to vote... then i can see how you're offended.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Actually, I think that women have the right to vote, the right to choose, and that 18+ year old men have the right to play video games that I might not agree with due to their possible sexist content. I do not agree in censorship in that regard. I think that we have the right to do what we want with in reason!
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

why only 18+ men? so many video games are considered sexist by the feminazis. hell, Fat Princess was considered sexist. GTA is allowed to be bought by kids with parental consent (which is virtually all) and any game with a female lead character is considered sexist because God forbid the game designers make the female lead hot.otherwise, yeah, women do deserve the right to vote... but it's not EQUAL to their right to having an abortion.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

:) This is in response to the "I guess though if you wanna ban sexist video games...." comment.I am a woman, but sometimes, I swear that the female sex (in the mainstream hub) do not possess brains, but believe that they do. Please all those wonderful government schools out there TEACH LOGIC FOR A CHANGE! Don't just push feminism down all of our throats. There ARE differences between men and women & we each have amazingly different roles in which we are to fulfil. Stop making EVERYTHING an issue for the feminist agenda!
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

I like to think that those "souls" get another chance at life. Or at the very minimum, get to enjoy life after death.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Lol, dude, this sides being serial down voted. How about a reply phantom down voter?
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

This gives new meaning to the "Phantom." Now do you all see what I mean about down voting? No rhyme or reason and done incorrectly to boot!
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

yeah, other side's getting it too...i know because i favored a comment over there (along with someone else) and we all got down voted.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

I rather fry somebody in prison than take away (from somebody that has never been convicted) a chance to live. But that's just me ;)
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Speaking of prisons... What do you think happen to those women who are found guilty of commissioning an illegal abortion? If you define abortion as murder then logically these women would be sentenced with murder, embryonocide as it were.NOTE Sorry, I noticed that I setup a straw man. Just correct me if that isn't your position.ENDNOTE
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

My position on abortion is that I'm against it but I wouldn't force my position on others.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Actually, that statement puts you 100% on the pro-choice side of the debate.Nobody favors abortion. Nobody wants to kill fetuses.Pro-choicers just think the decision should not be forced onto people by others.Pro-lifers sometimes try to portray pro-choicers as pro-abortion, but that simply is not the case.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

You may not favor abortion, and you may not favor killing fetuses but clearly someone does or all of this wouldn't be an issue. Some "pro-choicers" may not favor abortion but it's utterly ridiculous to claim that nobody favors abortion. (forgive my pun)
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

What are you talking about?Women who get abortions don't get them because they want to kill a fetus. They regard abortion as a necessary evil. They get an abortion because they feel the consequences of not getting an abortion are worse.Saying pro-choicers are pro-abortion is like saying America is pro-mass-murder because we nuked Japan.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-STERILIZATION

What do you mean? I'm for sterilization. The reason I went to get one of those government sponsored vasectomies is because I have two kids. The reason I have two kids is because I don't want three. I have a hard enough time keeping up with the two I already have.
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

Definitely. Lets sterilize anyone who doesn't want children.In fact, lets sterilize anyone who can't afford children.And anyone who wouldn't make a good parent.And anyone who...j/k
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-STERILIZATION

Actually, if you sterilize them at birth and then make them take a test which they must pass before the operation can be reversed, you can solve lots of problems ;)
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-LIFE

I'll keep this simple. The abortion issue is an issue because people continue to make bad choices. There are plenty of ways to have safe sex, and can considerably reduce the risk of a pregnancy. To me an abortion is more than murder its a refusal by the parents of the unborn child to take responsibility for their actions. Though I'm not willing to concede that a fetus is not a living thing or at the very least a group of cells with an extremely high probability of developing into an individual organism, I will for the moment put that issue aside. It's hard to imagine that anyone can argue that except for cases of rape, and perhaps even threat to the mother's health, the choice to have an abortion is the choice to run away from a potential "problem." It's a choice that is akin to foisting one's child off to a relative because the parent(s) would rather go off and live their lives free of the worries of parenthood. Not only is it irresponsible its utterly disheartening. Have we as a society really become so selfish?
Debate: PRO-LIFE vs PRO-CHOICE (OBAMA vs McCAIN VERSION)
Side: PRO-CHOICE

I agree that it's stupid and irresponsible to get pregnant, considering safe sex is possible. However no matter how dumb the girls maybe i refuse to have a say in what she does with her body. I simply cannot command someone to have a baby, or to get an abortion. It's her and her parents choice not mine. It's really none of my business to be able to vote pro choice or pro life and possibly end up forcing a young woman to have a baby.