Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

Communism and marxism are not better ideas than capitalism. Not that you'd know, as you're ignorant of all three.You're not getting what I've been saying at all.You see flaws everywhere, but not in yourself? nd you say you're NOT egotistical? Okay there...Everywhere means everywhere, should be obvious by definition what it means. If you think my views and opinions are flawed in some aspects that does not necessarily make it true, in case you are the one whose views and opinions are flawed. You can, still, understand what I'm saying with this?You want a society free of money and you adhere to a labour theory of value. How is that not communism?I won't repeat myself here.Money is a medium of exchange. Literally anything you trade can be argued as money. Literally every nation on earth has some form of money, even the communist ones, because even the communists understand that the economy grinds to a complete halt without a medium of exchange.You are saying that communists think that money is not needed and now you say they think it is needed?Economy based on money would come to a halt. That means people's worldview, their view of values, etc., and most importantly, you don't base our civilization on money.You don't think money is needed because you have no understanding about the role of money in the market.I understand very well the role of money and what its results will be if it is kept. If there was no money there could be no economic collapse, things would advance much faster, there would be no greed as it currently is, people would work because it was necessary not because they need money. If you needed something you wouldn't have to worry about first getting the money to acquire it, you would just get it.I've described you. You're a Marxist and a communist. I don't need to know your birthday or your religious views or any of that nonsense to see this. I don't know why you keep insinuating this.You're still not getting it.I only follow what I myself have come up with. Not some predetermined views.No, I don't need to know everything about you to know that your economic ideas are wrong. That's simply raising the bar. You don't know everything about me, does that mean I'm right too? Hmm?My economic ideas are not wrong. Not my problem you were taught and most probably raised wrong.I don't know everything about you, that's why I'm not claiming you to be someone anymore than you are claiming me to be.This, what you have been going about here, is all wrong. It works, with flaws, but there are better ways with far less flaws, if any.Hasn't been tried? have you ever heard of the USSR? their every effort was to remove money and guess what? It didn't work. Black markets grew and people found other mediums of exchange. I really hope your ideas improve in the future, because they are terrible right now.You're still not getting it. People are greedy, if they are not smart enough to know better. They were used to money, they were raised in an environment dictated by money. Money is not necessary, at all. Money only causes issues.My ideas aren't currently terrible, in fact they are far better than yours, and they will also improve, I'm fairly certain in that. Are your views improving? Or are they already set in place?Which part of your ideology is not communist, exactly?As I've said, you don't know everything about me. And as I've said, ...You have chosen something already existing, but a combination of your ignorance and your unwarranted high view of yourself blind you to this.Developing my own views is not choosing something already existing. You are ignorant and blind if you cannot understand that and comprehend the truth about money.High view of myself? I know I have flaws, and I also know I am much smarter than most of humanity, and that does not make me wrong. I simply look at reality, I observe and conclude (that includes me), you obviously cannot do any of it.saying "I'm more mentally mature than you" is the teenage equivalent of saying "I know you are, but what am I?". You lack maturity.More of your delusions? Seems so. As I've made clear, I'm not a teenager. You must be rather stupid to not understand that.You clearly lack maturity. Or do you call thinking with prejudice mature?Economics is utterly worthless to you when it comes to forming opinions on economics? If you say so...??? You do know what economics means? The definition? There is no need for money for that word to be valid.I know exactly why your ideas will fail and if you continue with these pointless assertions then my next post will only consist of these reasons.Seriously, open your mind and think.You are not above 19. No way. Soviet Russia collapsed in 1991. For you to be older than 20, but not know anything about communism means you are abhorrently unaware of the world around you.I am far more aware of the world than you are. That's what being unbiased causes.Evolution has NOT, I repeat NOT been happening since the beginning of our universe. Not even close. Evolution hasn't even been happening since the Earth formed. Evolution didn't start until after abiogenesis. Furthermore, molecules cannot reproduce. The word you should have used was "organisms". Is there any topic you are not woefully ignorant of? Furthermore, the theory of evolution is a predetermined view. It's tenants have been laid out and refined for the last 150 years or so.There are different evolutions. I am surprised you did not know that. The evolution of the universe. The evolution of a language. The evolution of science. The evolution of life. If you meant only life you should've said so.Molecules cannot reproduce? http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16382-artificial-molecule-evolves-in-the-lab.html And DNA is a molecule.You are the one who is ignorant in, apparently, many topics.Evolution is a fact, not a view. We all evolved from previous ancestors back to the first organisms on this planet.The mathematic extent of economics means that there are definitive correct answers that can be calculated. As it stands, there is no theory of a monetarily void economic system accepted and possibly functional by any economist professor anywhere. Are you honestly saying you know more about economics than literally everyone involved in the field of economics? That's rather egotistical of you.And more of your ignorant crap. I'm not saying you're ignorant in economics based on money, but that does seem to blind you. You clearly cannot come up with how humanity could work without money. That is, rather pathetic.Stuffing your head full of books does not necessarily make one smart if one is incapable of thinking without some predetermined opinions in the first place. Education does not necessarily make one smart, you either have the natural inclination or you don't, and you don't, clearly.More about economics? Why should I if I know there is a better way without money. Knowing money based economics in detail is pointless to me, it would give me nothing.Saying you're not a kid does not prove you're not a kid. Sorry.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/kid?s=t I'm a young goat? Nope.I'm leather? Nope.It's quite impossible to be activity.A wooden tub? Definitely not.Saying you're right does not prove you're right. Sorry.Honestly, begin using your mind without bias, it'll do good to you.If there was no money, there would be no economics for there to be any math on, you fool.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/economics?s=ts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EconomicsCare to rethink what you claimed?There would still be math. There would always be math in physics, chemistry, some other fields. Even in economics, although not as much. How is making things simpler a bad thing? Can you make physics simpler? No.I didn't read the rest, Frankly, you're not worth the time.So, that's how weak you are, cannot even finish. But, yeah, it was rather long...You are definitely worth the time. Just to argue with your flawed opinions and views.