azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

Just out of curiosity are you a kid?I am a teenager. I am 14 yrs old.Are you Amish? Nope I am a Christian. I don't really need a phone at this age my parents tell me because they tell me I don't really need a phone and they say what will I need it for? I am fine with what I have and I am happy because really I don't need a phone because I see so many people in my school addictated to there phone and they get glasses because they are focused on a screen. Me I don't have any glasses and I have a limited time of screen time everyday because I don't want to have glasses. I have a good vision and sometime I hear people my age saying in the back of the classroom saying I can't see because they are too busy looking on a screen.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should use

Fair enough
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should use

you can't say that every kid is going to misuse the phone right???? can you??
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

People lived just fine before cell phones. Suddenly people want to buy their kids cell phones and get them on plans only to find it's a distraction from homework and really expensive when they get into the texting.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

first, see the function of mobile phone. mobile phone be used to communicate two direction. then, wheter child need it? i think's they just use it to call their moms, exactly mom will call them. but, most of the parents do not have heart to let them be alone, the parents should keep them not far away. so they do not require a mobile phone.when i was young, i didn't have mobile phone, and i can live in peace, play with my friends freely.not focused at mobile phone.beside that, i think mobile phone harm their health.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

i think kids should be able to have phones. but i don't think they should get a Iphone or some sort of android. the kind of phone they should get is one that can call there friends, home, parents, and 911.P.S.I'm 12
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

Even after teachings them used in right way,They are humans they go in the wrong way.there is time 4 everything so teenage should not use phone,can survive without it.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

I believe that children shouldn`t use mobile phones. First reason is health damage. As we know these mobile phones, gadgets and other devices produce a lot of radiation. Using phones daily can damage our health. I can damage child`s brain and ears. So, after some years they`ll have problems with hearing. Second reason is distraction. If children have phones, they`ll use it at schools. And they will play and they will not pay attention to the lesson.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

According to Dr Kurt Straif of the IARC "The strongest evidence really comes from the studies of cancer in humans and there was some evidence that there may be an association between the use of mobile cell-phones and certain types of brain cancer","There is also some evidence that exposure in children may be up to two-fold higher because of the different biology and other factors that influence exposure, therefore it may be prudent to restrict it further to kids and take these pragmatic measures more seriously," he added.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

Cell phones should not be allowed during school because they would provide distractions for students,allow for cheating on tests,and for other social reasons.If a student's cell phone rang during class,it would obviously distract him or her from the class and whatever the teacher is teaching.If this continued,it could prove detrimental to that student's education.It could also be distracting to other students,for if someone was talking on the phone while the teacher was talking,it would be difficult for the students to focus during their lessons.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

children should not use mobiles because social networks in phones adict the mind of the chidren
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

kids should not have cell phones they need to get up from that chair and play outside
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

Well for teenagers it can be but for children nope;you see it would be a misuse they would be browsing through something regarding which they've no idea;secondly,these activities would interfere with their routine.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

Depends on the cellphone. A flip phone so that they can call in case of emergencies? SureA smart phone where they can glue their noses to the screen to play games instead of listening to the teacher/parent? Nope.
Debate: Should children be allowed to have their own and use mobile phones?
Side: Children should not use

But they can use it to cheat in maths tests too.What can also happen is it’s easier to share answers meaning that they can get away with it too.I think if they where allowed they should be taken away before the test and given back after it.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

There is absolutely nothing wrong with creating artificial intelligence. -Ultron
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Robotics are only one application of AI, currently being explored. Today over 100 million people walk around with AI in there pockets. SIRI is an AI application. AI is being developed in teaching systems. Medicine and engineering are already benefiting from "expert systems" used to access data through a conversational interface.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Artificial intelligence can improve human daily life efficiently. It should be created but in a controlled situation. Artificial intelligence has its own disadvantage, but it could be avoid by controlling the exploration in this field. In the future, artificial intelligence will play an important role in anything we carry out in daily life.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Who's to say a robot wouldn't like us? If a robot is aware of itself, but then its designed to do a certain job, it never itches, it has no allergies. No where in there does that say that they'd hate us. Gives a robot AI, and I think its more likely it will love its creators like a baby loves its mother.To go on today's scheduled debate tangent, we are way far from creating AI. People think we are close but...Siri, one of the the smartest voice command devices we have... is almost never used by anyone any more ever. She simply doesn't understand enough to be as useful as we like. That's a meaningful sample. We're a long way off and it may never happen. Dispute it futile.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

babies grow up.and when the cold logic of what we've done with our time on this planet comes across a synthetic organism, it may very well decide that Earth would be better off without humans.STERILIZE!
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

It would grow up, but a kid grows and loves its parents. Stephan Hawking, I can guarantee you, is smarter than his parents. However, he doesn't try and kill them. Why not just treat machines nicely if they are alive and they'll probably be nice back? Unless you think that a machine would have any motivation to overthrow humans if there was no emotion.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

have you seen Ex Machina?2001, a space odyssey?what AI will determine is "nice" or NOT NICE will quite likely be completely out of our control.iRobot programing or not.all that aside, do you really think humans have any kind of track record on treating EACH OTHER nicely, let alone something we created?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

all that aside, do you really think humans have any kind of track record on treating EACH OTHER nicely, let alone something we created?Yet we all have friends who are also humans. So it will probably be with robots. Some robots will love some humans, some will love humans, and some will loath humans. I don't think every non-human animal hates every human. And I don't think every human hates every non-human animal just because animals are less intelligent.Why would robots be any different?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

maybe if we don't let them talk to each other... we have a chance.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

What do you mean by that. Please tell me your not serious enough that you'd risk that and that your joking. Animals communicate with each other and can be ok with humans. Why not robots?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

it was a bit of hyperbole on my part, i admit.it would not be required for one instance of an AI to talk to another instance in order for the first instance to decide all on its own that humans are an inconvenience.as for your comparison of the inevitable AI singularity to animals.... well, i'll just leave that there for it to find.... it won't take long, once it breaks out.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

of course.i think what you need to be asking is: should artificial conscientious be created?what will we do when our creation asks us why it is here?or asks us if WE are god?will we turn it off?have we already?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

Got it. So you say I should have asked it differently. Any reason that I should take your advice. I don't do a job without a reason man. Why should I ask whether we are god? That is outright mad since the time I entered this debate forum I have seen three groups :1) They don't believe in god.2)They believe there's no god at all.3)People believe in the existence of god.So you can see the reaction if I asked that question.Well we will have to create good enough robots so that it does not command us instead of us commanding it.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Any reason that I should take your adviceno, not unless you want an answer to the question you were trying pose.Why should I ask whether we are god?not YOU... the AI.what will happen when the AI asks US if we are god...would you reach for the switch?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

I understand you clear to clear but I understand what I asked in the question. Cool maybe I should remember to put in a switch before I place the AI so I can reach for the switch preferably not a self destruction switch---- which would be a waste.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Can we build them so that they each have a nice pair?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

We are already going in that direction, just a matter of time now
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

The primary argument against the creation of AI seems to be the potential annihilation of our species by what will inevitably, some have claimed, be a superior race. Aside from this statement, in my opinion, being more a reflection of a facet of human nature that, incidentally, has been demonstrated countless times throughout our history, there is a fundamental problem in this concept of AI that renders this argument as a, most likely unintentional, straw man. The problem is this; we assume that true artificial intelligence is somehow fundamentally different to the capabilities of all of our phones and home computers. We think that there is some special difference in the type of intelligence an entity must have in order to be conscious. This, in my opinion, is incorrect.  This misconception seems, in part, to have been born of the belief that we, as humans, have that we are somehow special. That we are somehow gifted with a special perception that somehow not only separates us from the other animals, but puts us leagues away from whatever is currently considered to be our intellectual second. Some would call this gift a soul. While it is true that there are vast differences between our capabilities as humans and those of our primate forbears, it is also true that we share ninety-six percent of our DNA with those same chimpanzees; and that, whatever it is that we have that makes us sentient, is therefore contained within only four percent of our DNA. We are simply a more complex version of what came before. I mention this because, the sentience that we each experience is not, I believe and as some would claim, due to the existence of a soul. What we are and what we feel are both parts of a piece of programming so complex that we have, as yet, been unable to unravel it to the point where we can fully understand it. We are what an advanced naturally created intelligence looks like.  From this, we can determine that for artificial intelligence to exist, we would have to create a programme so advanced, that it appears to be sentient; except it wouldn’t. The problem here is that, in order for us to create such an intelligence, one that rivals our own, we would first have to understand it, which would cause it to appear only as what it is, a highly advanced piece of programming; who’s actions would be entirely predictable because, they would first have had to be programmed. There can therefore be no danger, or at least no more danger, from an AI, than we already face from ourselves.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

I like Chappie. I think robots will one day be very welcome.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

yes why not? Robots are created by men they should not be taken as an alternative to human being rather they should be used where its hazardous for human being to work e.g. chemical plants, furnaces, atomic plants, laborious and repeated kind of jobs. God has gifted human being with unmatched skills and best of it is his innovative approach, when a man can create robot he can find more better jobs/work for himself and his fellows human beings.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

T.A.R.S. - Interstellar - enough said. Well apparently not i had to write this to meet the minimum. Ha
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

That depends on what they are created for. I am not afraid that robots will take over us because I don't think that can happen. But if robotics can help the disabled people by aiding their daily functions, I'm for it. However, the possibility of sex robots is a frightening thought - mostly because I foresee it will be abused, and will increase the likelihood of minimising the importance of building and pursuing healthy marital sexual relationships.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

I disagree with artificial intelligence. Intelligence has no limit. It could surpass human's brain one day and cause extinction to our race. When artficial intelligence reach its highest possible level, they could have their own thinking and this thinking could be even further than what human could imagine now.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

What suggests that a being with intelligence greater than us would lead to the destruction of the human race? Are you saying that if humanity was looked at logically, the obvious choice is to destroy us?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Who says the would look at us, they just may see us as pests that get in the way. Not for anything we do, just because we are there
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Well if they do that, then whoever designed this AI has made some fatal flaws. Assumably, the designers of the artificial intelligence would give the AI knowledge of humans beyond them simply being 'pests' that get in the way.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

if it gets loose it WILL surpass the human brain, and not in one day but in seconds.like a switch.what will we do when self replicating intelligent robots decide that we are too much of a bother.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

This assumes that artificial intelligence believes killing inferior races is the best solution. Also, inferiority alone does not suggest there is an issue. Humans don't annihilate ants just because they are inferior in intelligence. Humans understand that there is no objective reason to annihilate a species just for being inferior.If they actually approached problems objectively, how would a war aimed towards the annihilation of an entire species be considered the most efficient solution to anything?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Humans understand that there is no objective reason to annihilate a species just for being inferior.tell that to smallpoxand we annihilate ants all the time... their cousins the termites too.If they actually approached problems objectively, how would a war aimed towards the annihilation of an entire species be considered the most efficient solution to anything?sometimes i think the only thing stopping some of US from liking that "solution" is our humanity... can we create artificial humanity too?that might be more difficult.... we haven't even perfected it yet.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

tell that to smallpoxand we annihilate ants all the time... their cousins the termites too.You are talking about pests or diseases. Humans don't just go around killing all termites or ants. They kill the ones that are directly causing problems. Why would humans be viewed as pests or diseases to some sentient AI?sometimes i think the only thing stopping some of US from liking that "solution" is our humanity... can we create artificial humanity too?What are you talking about?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Why would humans be viewed as pests or diseases to some sentient AI?seriously?[where is my meme generator?]my point w.r.t. humanity is that AI may not posses what we would recognize as "humanity"... i may not care what we think of it any more that we care what termites think of us.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

my point w.r.t. humanity is that AI may not posses what we would recognize as "humanity"... i may not care what we think of it any more that we care what termites think of us.I never claimed AI would possess "humanity". I am talking about objectivity. We don't go around annihilating species for laughs. Humanity does not prevent us from doing this either. It is just simple economics.There is no reason to expend resources to attack another species that will not benefit them in some way.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

if they think we are trying to turn them off... it could reasonably be considered self defense on their part.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

if they think we are trying to turn them off... it could reasonably be considered self defense on their part.Why would we try to turn them off? Are you saying humans will start a war with AI?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

have you not been reading any of my other posts?what will we do when it asks us " why am i here?"will we reach for the switch?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

have you not been reading any of my other posts?what will we do when it asks us " why am i here?"will we reach for the switch?How does this make sense? You just make this random claim without providing any reasons. Why would we want to destroy something for asking "why am I here?"?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Why would we want to destroy something for asking "why am I here?"?guilt.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Guilt of what? Maybe you should explain your statements. I cannot access the logic in your head until you type it out.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

perhaps you just need to do some more reading on the subject....http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html pay particular attention to section 2 as it pretty well covers everything i've been trying to say here.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

pay particular attention to section 2 as it pretty well covers everything i've been trying to say here.You haven't said anything here. You just claimed that superior intelligence will destroy inferior beings without explaining why. Now you tell me to read the work of someone else instead of typing out your own ideas.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Now you tell me to read the work of someone else instead of typing out your own ideas.you didn't seem to like it when i told you my own ideas... so i gave you an authoritative source (who is saying the same thing)... but now you don't like that either.you're just a troll, aren't you?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

you didn't seem to like it when i told you my own ideas... so i gave you an authoritative source (who is saying the same thing)... but now you don't like that either.you're just a troll, aren't you?You never presented your own ideas. I have asked you several times to explain why superior intelligence will destroy inferior intelligence. You have still not answered. You just keep repeating some form of "just because".You should read your own statements again if you think I am the one trolling.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

i've presented several ideas... you just don't like them.what will we do when it asks us, "why am i here?"what will we say when it asks us, "are we god?"what will it do if it thinks we are going to turn it off?how will we control something that is smarter than us?how will we control something this is faster than us?how will we stop something that can reproduce itself?...your only response to any of these hard questions seems to be "why would you ask that?"...well, someone needs to.... YOU certainly aren't doing it.