Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

This subject is probably the one that I get most angry about. The question is should abortion be legal. Before we start anything we need to know what the word "abortion" means:Abortion: a medical procedure used to end a pregnancy and cause the death of the fetus (merriam Webster dictionary)Now people (and I'm talking about pro choice people) could say, "Yes that's what abortion means. It's the death of a fetus and a fetus is not a human. Now from that statement we need to see what a fetus actually is.Fetus: a human being or animal in the later stages of development before it is born (merriam Webster dictionary)I got both those definitions from Webster so that's not in my words but back to the argument. A fetus (from the definition) is an unborn child that's in the mothers belly. What I mean by that is like the definition which is the stages before birth. So we can put those 2 definitions together and say that:Abortion is the death of a fetus = abortion is the death of a unborn childThat's the huge point of this argument of whether or not it's a person that's being aborted and pro choice people claim that it's not because a fetus in not a human and when it actually becomes a Hume but haha clearly I just proved that with the definitions but if you don't believe that (which I don't know why you wouldn't) then I will go into more detail. Like I said the big argument is when it's actually becomes a person. Pro life people like myself say it's at conception that it becomes a person which means that when the egg and the sperm come together as one that's when it becomes a person because that's conception. For pro choice people, that's a bit different. It's kinda hard to get a straight answer from the whole group of pro choice people because Iv heard different things from other choice people. Some have said, "it's a person when it is actually born" or "it becomes a person a few months after conception". There are many other things Iv heard but the list is to long. Side note: the pro choice stance seems very inconsistent about the subject of when a person is a person but the pro life stance already knows when it happens so just think about that. Anyway so we need to find out which side is right. I'll choose one argument that some pro choice people choose which is "it becomes a person when it's born". I'm choosing one because that's the one Iv heard the most and I also only want to put one argument, the most popular argument of pro choice, against the pro life argument which is that life starts at conception so the big question is which one is right? Well that's very simple to find out. Most pro choice people are atheists and atheits always go to science for the answer so there gonna get a kick out of what I'm about to say. There's a less known sience called embryology. Search it if you don't believe me. The whole science is about about this kind of stuff, studying embryos and fetuses. And this science has spent so much time focusing on the abortion topic and has studied the stages of a fetus, has studied the stages of pregnancy, and most importantly has studied when life starts. So that brings everything together to find out which argument, or which side (pro life vs pro choice) is right. Does life begin at birth or at conception. Like I said these are trained professional scientists who have been studying this subject for years and have concluded that life does indeed start at conception. That means a fetus is indeed a person (just like I said with the definitions) and if the fetus, or person, was aborted, that means the person was muderd. So pro life wins that one. That's what people need to understand because it has been scientifically proven that life begins at birth. Now since we know now that life starts at conception, we need to clearify a few things. This is the part where we find the true pro lifers. The other part that gets so controversial is not only the "when life begins part" but also what people think is exceptions to abortion. This is when the morality part hits. Since we know that abortion is muder, and since American let's that be legal, (which for the life of me have no idea why) we could ask if that's human rights violations which it is. This country says that every, let me say that again, every human has rights including rights to there life. That includes the humans that are unborn because they are people. And since we let that be legal we are going against human rights by killing thousands of unborn babies. Sorry that got alittle off track of what I wanted to say next. Like I said, people think there should be "exceptions" to abortion. And I know you have heard them: rape, getting pregnant even though you used a condom, the mother has a big chance of dying, etc. The 2 biggest ones that people are alittle bit confused about is rape and the mother possibly dying. Now I want to clearify something that people think pro life think: WE BELIEVE THAT WOMEN SHOULD HAVE RIGHTS TO THERE BODIES!!!!! Just not when it comes to abortion because it's not the women's rights that are being taken when but its the unborn babies rights being taken away but anyway. Let's talk about rape first. Picture this: a 13-14 year old girl got raped. It's a terrible thing that happened and she got pregnant. The big question is should she abort because it was an unwanted pregnancy. That's a big question that some pro lifers think twice about. Now we need to look at this from a moral sense. Since abortion is murder then the teenage girl shouldn't do it no matter what. Even though she got raped, morally she should not kill the baby. Now people think that I don't think women deserve rights. If you think that look up a bit at the capital letters and read that. Now back to this. People say they should abort it since she got raped and didn't want it. Now let's put that logic in another sense: if me and you were talking and you piss me off then does that give me the right to go and kill my best friend? People would say, "no because that really doesn't make sense. If I pissed you off then why would you kill your best friend?" Now some of you (hopefully) saw what I did there. Those to situations have differently things happening but the same question comes up which is should I kill them for something bad that happened to me? And the answer is no. 2 wrongs don't make a right. And plus you don't have to abort it because there's an amazing thing called adoption which you can give your baby to another family if you can't care for it. And you won't feel guilty about it for the rest of your life! The other "exception" is when the mothers life is at risk. This one is a lot hard to explain then the rape one. But people need to ask another question which is, "who deserves life more?" Which don't get me wrong, everyone deserves life but think about it, the mother has already lived her life. The baby hasn't had a chance to speak up for itself and live it's own life. Now people might think "this kid thinks killing is ok". No I don't, that's why I'm pro life but any baby should have the right to live there life even if that means the expense of the mother loosing hers. It's a crappy reality but it's the right one. Plus there have been so many medical miracles that have saved both the baby and the mother. I believe that's why people need to be pro life because if it (hopefully) gets banned then I assure you, it will save more lives and make this country a better place. Btw I'm only 15.