azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Contraception should be required because it is a women's right to choose? If a murderer wishes to purchase a weapon to use for mass slaughter will you favor his decision as well since he has the right to choose what he wants? No. The company has the right to deny service to him and thus can do the same with contraception. You cannot favor the liberty of women without favoring the liberty of a business.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Logical fallacy. Contraception is not comparable to murder. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

You missed the notion of my example. The point you must grasp is that a business can deny service. That is a right of business. Humans have the right to choose. Humans do not have the right to recieve all that they want. You cannot favor liberty for women and not favor liberty for business. My notion still stands. I never claimed or stated that contraception was murder or was the equivalent of murder.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Liberty is not the right to violate someone's rights. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Liberty is the ability to do as one pleases. A business is allowed to choose it's services. Are you saying a business cannot choose?
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Are you saying that a woman cannot choose? .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

To choose contraception? A woman can choose contraception. A business can choose if it wants to even provide that or not.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Wrong. No one has the right to violate a woman's right to choose. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

If I only sell tires and a woman asks me to provide contraception am I violating her rights? No. I choose not to provide it. If an insurance companie doesn't have contraception covered are they violating a woman's rights? No. They choose not to cover it. It is their right not to cover it.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

That I agree with. I think cover both or cover neither. If an insurance company covers neither, oftentimes in cases of medical need, you can still get it covered. I think more than anything, people shouldn't have to fight so hard when it's medical need. But when someone is taking either medicine as a choice, they can pay for it themselves. Nice talking to you!
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Thank you for your time. I enjoyed sharing information and swapping ideas.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Wrong. Women have the right to affordable contraception. I am so tired of sexist males telling women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. My body, my right, my choice. I have the right to choose. Contraception on demand and without apology.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Women have the right to affordable contraception. Yes, this is true. If an insurance company provides it then by all means pursue it. I believe you are misinterpreting the question at hand here.Should contraception be covered by health insurance?If you say "yes" to this question you are implying that all insurance companies must provide contraception. A woman's choice to choose contraception is not what we are discussing here. We are arguing on whether insurance companies must provide contraception.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Contraception should be covered because it is the woman's right. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Okay. Allow me to further explain, because you are not understanding what I am telling you. I agree that it is a woman's right to purchase contraception. It is not a right to force insurance companies to provide them for you unless they wish to do so.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Wrong. It is a right for women to assert their right to choose.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

It is not right for a person to coerce an insurance company into providing coverage over contraception. That is implementing the use of force. If you value liberty then you value a businesses right to choose what services it wishes to provide.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Wrong. Women have the right to assert their right to choose. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Are you saying that a business does not have liberty? Is that your claim?
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Are you saying that women do not have liberty? Is that your claim?
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Fighting my question with a question? Very well. A woman has the right to choose what she wants. A business has the right to choose what it shall provide to the public.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Wrong. No one has the right to violate a woman's right to choose.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

It is not a violation. A business chooses not to do something out of there own liberty. An insurance company is the same. They are allowed, by the logical notions within liberty, to choose what they shall provide.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Not if it violates the woman's right to choose. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

I am no longer arguing with you. You cannot understand what I am trying to tell you. I am beating a dead horse. I am finished.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

The feeling is mutual. #needyourpermission .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Contraception is something that a person would typically seek out by themselves. Insurance companies should not have to provide a person with any contraceptions.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

How come every time a statist doesn't like something its evil and needs to be banned, but if they want something it suddenly becomes a fundamental human right and its okay to force others to pay for it?
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Contraception is a right. My body, my right, my choice. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

No it is not a right. You have the right to do what you want with your body, but you do not have the right to force others to pay for your contraception.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Yes it is a right. No one has the right to deny my right to choose. Not your body? Not your choice.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

As I just stated, you have the right to do what you want with your body but you don't have the right to force other people to pay for your contraceptives. Did you even read what I wrote?
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

It seems that we have a similar notion. A woman has the right to contraceptives, but a woman does not have the right to force an insurance company to pay for her conception unless there was a voluntary contract signed before hand that clearly states that the insurance company will pay.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

I disagree. No one has the right to discriminate. Gender discrimination is a violation of civil rights. #needyourpermission
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

I do think not covering birth control currently is discrimination. Right now, every insurance company I know of covers viagra and other ED drugs. That tells me they support the man's right to screw the woman, but not the woman's right not to get pregnant from that. If they want to pay for the one, then they should pay for the other. However, without a doctor saying it's medically necessary, they don't need to pay for either one. Women's rights is all about the right to choose. To choose a lifestyle, to choose a job (or to not work at all), and to choose to engage in sex. If a woman chooses to engage in sex, part of that responsibility is paying for birth control. Just like if a guy with ED chooses to screw, he needs to pay for his own meds.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

How is it discrimination? Do you not understand that both genders use contraceptives, right?
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Most contraceptive methods are designed for females. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Women get birth control pills, men get condoms... If it isn't in your plan then it doesn't have to be covered, get it? Good!
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

wrong. HMOs do not have the right to get between myself and my doctor. I have the right to choose.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

No one is getting between you and your doctor, stop using that straw man argument. Your health insurance agency either doesn't offer a plan that covers contraceptives or you aren't paying for one, you have the choice to switch agencies, plans or do what most people: buy their own contraceptives!
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

It is not a strawman to assert a woman's right to choose. Women who do not have money have the same right to choose as women with money. I am not arguing for free healthcare and contraception, but affordable healthcare and contraception. Because i support worker's rights, I believe in paying my doctors a fair wage for their services. I feel like it is a logical fallacy to automatically assume that I want everything for free. Please stop it. I do not. I just want things to be affordable. I know that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and if you let me present my case, I can state why I should be allowed contraception to be covered.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

It is not a strawman to assert a woman's right to choose.Actually, it is. You're saying that your "right to choose" is being infringed on by someone not paying for it.I am not arguing for free healthcare and contraception, but affordable healthcare and contraception. Because i support worker's rights, I believe in paying my doctors a fair wage for their services. I feel like it is a logical fallacy to automatically assume that I want everything for free. Its not a fallacy because it is exactly what you are arguing for, you're saying that your rights are being trampled on because someone won't buy you contraceptives.I just want things to be affordable. I know that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and if you let me present my case, I can state why I should be allowed contraception to be covered.Condoms and birth control pills are already affordable to most people, most of my friends and I work for $7.25 and hour and can afford contraceptives. Contraceptives should only be covered if it was in the plan to begin with, if you didn't agree to a plan that covers contraceptives then it shouldn't be covered.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Its not a fallacy because it is exactly what you are arguing for, you're saying that your rights are being trampled on because someone won't buy you contraceptives. That is not what I am saying. I am arguing for affordable contraception, not free contraception. You need to be truthful when you quote me, or I just will not speak to you, end of story.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

You can't argue that companies should be forced to cover contraceptives and then say that you aren't arguing for free contraceptives.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Incorrect. I am arguing for fair prices, not free stuff. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Its not in your plan and you're asking for them to pay for it, that is what we call free...
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

What we have here is a disagreement. I disagree. Have a nice day hun. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

I disagree. Oh wow, you really showed me. You're wrong and you know it, you can't even be honest about what you're arguing about, idiot.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

This is what you are doing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem,  https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem,  and this is what I need you to be doing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/logic, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/logic.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Please explain to me what this logical fallacy is? You have a health care plan that does not include coverage of contraceptives, but you are demanding that they cover it anyway. You are asking them to provide a service that you did not pay for, yet, you say you are not arguing for free contraceptives. You have also said that health insurance not covering contraceptives is sexist despite the fact that both genders use contraceptives.This is what you are doing, stop yelling and give me a definitive answer.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

It is not a logical fallacy for me to disagree with you, and I refuse to speak to if you are going to be disrespectful and call names. You lose when you make personal attacks.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

It is a logical fallacy for you to say you are not arguing for free contraception when you are asking your health insurance provider to give you free contraceptive coverage.You lose when you refuse to answer questions, if this was your debate you would have banned me by now, but you can't, so you're just going to give me this weak excuse.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

And I am done. I am not arguing for free contraception, but affordable contraception. Go ahead and have the last word, since that is all that you care about.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

You arguing that your health care provider should be providing a service to you that you haven't payed for.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

No I am not. I am more than willing to pay if it is a fair price. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

"Women who do not have money have the same right to choose as women with money." - Sitara You're saying that women without the money should also have access to contraceptives.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

And this conversation is over. I am not going to keep banging my head against a wall.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

It is a fallacy......
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Whatever floats your boat, hun. .
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Contraception is a right because its a right because its a right. God damn fucking hell! It a right! a right! Of woman! My body! Fucking facists. Go for it Sitara. Its a right!
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Well shit fire and save your matches! ;)
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Why should the government have to pay for people to be able to have sex and not have children. Sex not to reproduce is recreational and not necessary for the world so if people can't pay for it themselves they can just not have it.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: Yes

Sex is absolutely necessary. It is a fundamental part of a loving successful relationship (I'm not saying that's all that matters). I would like to know your thoughts or "education" regarding why sex is not necessary for the world. Contraception should absolutely be covered by health insurance. If we are talking money aspect, it is far cheaper to pay for contraceptives than it is the pregnancy and birth of a baby. I guess I'm confused on your thought process.
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

Not unless you want to go from Capitalism to Socialism. Oh wait....
Debate: Should contraception be covered by health insurance?
Side: No

You wanna have sex, pay for contraception with your own money.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

Yes and all 12000 different creation myths from all over the world.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

People should decide for themselves instead of blindly following anything. Teach both.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

Certainly, individuals should be allowed to choose their own worldviews. However, the role of schools is to educate not to indoctrinate. Creationism and intelligent design have no basis in fact or reason; they are purely theological constructions. If someone wishes to learn about religion, or parents want to indoctrinate their offspring, then they can got to a church or other place of worship.It is not blind to follow knowledge and reason. It is blind to dogmatically adhere to something for which there is no evidence simply because you have been raised or socialized to believe it is true.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

Aye, my highschool had a SCIENCE class, where I learned evolution and real science, and a mythology class I took which taught the creation stories of many religions. I got the Christian story, the Islamic story, the Jewish story, the ancient Greek story, Ancient Egyptian story, some African stories and loads of stuff.Now THAT'S learning.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

You raise an important distinction I think, which I should like to speak to. I think that Christianity and other contemporary religions can be taught in schools as you were instructed in it (as mythology alongside other mythologies), but not that it should be taught alongside evolution as if it were scientific.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

Teach both... while we are at it lets teach them that the sun orbits the earth. We should let them decide not just blindly follow anything.The problem with this stance is that it is on about teaching it in the science class, intelligent design and creationism are not science. If any of them had evidence supporting them, then its a different matter. Anyway creationism (the biblical creation) has been shown to be false.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

It has not been shown to be false definitively. Please be serious.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

yes the biblical story has been proven false. If you think otherwise you either haven't read the creation myth of Genesis (It contains two which contradict each other, but I will look over that) or you don't know much science.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

Prove the biblical story has been proven false.I will humor you.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

1) Well according to genesis God created plants on the third day and the sun on the fourth. Plants cannot survive without sunlight and we know the sun formed 5 billion years ago and life started almost 2 billion years after that. 2)Also there are seas before there are stars, without the stars there would not be any oxygen. Just so you understand what this means, water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, so no stars no water.3) Also it talks about God separating the light and dark, calling the light day and the darkness night, before he made the stars.
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

Okay, so you have proven that most of the creationism in the bible is false. However, can creationism in general be disproved? It cannot. Evolution is not definitive because of the lack of "the missing link".
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

Creationism in the bible is what I said, I don't know every creation story but unless they can provide evidence supporting them they shouldn't be taught in science classes. Also what missing link?
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should be taught

What SHOULD be taught in schools is that not everything science has to claim is truth. AND THAT, the unknown, the 'non variable" (according to science) ought to be taken into consideration. And so THEREFORE, creationism being taught is not wrong, and should be encouraged. This way, the person can decipher for themselves what is truth, NOT SIMPLY because science says "this is truth".
Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

I have never heard what science doesn't know being referred to as non variable. If science doesn't know, then scientists say they don't know. Also you say that the unknown should be taken into consideration therefore creationism should be taught, this is stupid. If that is the case we should teach all the creation myths because in a science class evidence no longer matters, you should teach reincarnation, astrology, alchemy and also that inside the brain are little men controlling things. Creationism being taught alongside evolution is wrong because one is science and the other is not. Would you teach that in the bible pi is three in a maths class because those mathematicians are not always right?Or will you teach that the crusades never happened because those historians are not always right? You should teach what the evidence shows and in the case of pi being 3.14... there is a lot, the case that the crusades occurred there is a lot, with evolution there is a lot and with creationism there is none.This way, the person can decipher for themselves what is truth, NOT SIMPLY because science says "this is truth".No I will repeat it again maybe if someone continues to repeat it, it might sink in. Evolution is based upon evidence creationism is not, what teaching both alongside each other says is that we are not sure which one is true, when clearly that is not the case there is no controversy. Also by all means teach creationism in a religion class, but it is not science, so it should not be taught in a science class.