azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Pretty much the links he posted. But these in particular: http://justiceforall.firedoglake.com/2013/12/10/family-research-council-distorts-researchers-work-a-decade-after-he-demanded-a-retraction/http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2011/02/peter-sprigg-proves-family-research.htmlhttp://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2010/12/family-research-council-defends-itself.htmlhttp://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.  com/2011/06/family-research-council-sneaking.html
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Couldn't of put it better another great article from the Family Research Center!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

There is no proof of your accusations. You need to come up with a neutral source.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

4 real... who would you call a neutral source? From my point of view almost all medical and educational institutions have completely bought in to the gay agenda. Anyone who speaks out against the gay agenda from within those institutions are instantly purged.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

The link i have provided accuratly presents both sides of an issue and leaves you to think for yourself.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Homosexuality disgusts me and they have a mental problem and they need help!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

You need to debate with logic, and not emotion. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

You need to debate with logic, and not emotion. .The bible is logic
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Prove it. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Some Christian you are you are arguing against Christians.................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Excellent counter argument. (sarcasm)Being a Christian does not inherently mean that all Christians must agree with eachother. Also, there is a huge difference between "arguing" and "debating." Debate implies reasoning, and does not necessarily imply that you are fighting eachother. It's supposed to be an intellectual conversation.I think that you currently are just blindly arguing, rolling out hate, avoiding questions, and using the Bible and Christianity as your defense.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

No true Scotsman, ad hom, and strawman fallacies. Im not arguing against Chrstians, just asking people to be better debaters, and you are not the author and finisher of faith that you should have any right to say who is and is not Chrstian as well as the fact that Im not obligated to agree with someone just becfause they are a Chrstian. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NotrueScotsman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhominem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

You don't feel that the bible is logical? :S
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Yes. I just want people to prove their claims. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Is it really? Think long and hard about that one without putting your religious bias into play here.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Homosexuality disgusts me and they have a mental problem and they need help! Tell me where it logically says this in the Bible.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Romans 1:25-27 (King James Version)Page OptionsShare on facebook Share on twitter Share on email  >>Show resourcesAdd parallelRomans 1:25-27King James Version (KJV)25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Says the one that didn't use logic on my other topic !!! hypocrite !!!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Um, ok, that statement sort of disgusts me because of the ignorance behind it, but regardless of that:How does that make it so they cannot be allowed to adopt? There are plenty of people with mental problems (I'm not saying homosexuals have a mental problem, they don't) who may adopt already...
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Your ignorant of the gospelRomans 1:25-27 (King James Version)Page OptionsShare on facebook Share on twitter Share on email  >>Show resourcesAdd parallelRomans 1:25-27King James Version (KJV)25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

So, we must follow every single teaching of the Bible, correct?Tell me, did you ever do ANYTHING, EVER that could ever have dishonored your parents?Ever. At all. Even if you repented. No matter what. Because if so, you must be put to death. Leviticus 20:9 says: "Anyone who dishonors father or mother must be put to death. Such a person is guilty of a capital offense."I assume that you, having your need to preach the gospel, find children who have dishonored their parents and command that they are executed. I don't have ignorance of the gospel. I understand that everything in the gospel is not meant to be taken literally and not all of it is meant to be applied to every single part of life.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Your personal disgust at homosexuality doesn't relate to the argument of gay people being allowed to adopt, whilst your view that homosexuality is a mental problem is simply wrong. I'd like to know how you define mental problems.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

GAYS AND THEIR LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

And what exactly have the gays lied about?I mean, do you have any specifics?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

That being a perverted homosexual should be allowed and tolerated without shame or penalty.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

What makes a homosexual perverted and why shouldn't they be tolerated without shame or penalty? Being homosexual is natural.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Homosexuality is a choice and perverted would you want people to see gay people kissing? EWWW..... It disgusts me.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Gays should not be allowed to adopt because:1) the world is created for a male and a female to become a couple. From there, they will procreate and extends the existence of the humankind. Gays cannot procreate unless they receive the help of Science. Thus, by allowing adoption, are we encouraging such relationships?2) The child(ren) will not grow up in a wholesome family to understand straight human relationships. While I am not against homosexuality, it is a matter of choice, I do not encourage it. How should the child(ren) be taught to address the parents; as father or mother or simply fathers / mothers? The child(ren) will likely grow up to face social pressures. While we cannot for sure say that gays will bring up gays, I am not confident to say that the child(ren) will not be influenced by his / their gay parents towards their own sexual orientation.3) Adoption should be an option for couples who have failed to have children. This is entirely different from people who simply cannot because of their sexual orientation.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Have fun proving your crap......................................................................................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Homosexuals disgust me and their perverts and are disgusting...............
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Very true.Homosexuality isa mental disorder. Its a disease. Would you risk innocent children to be exposed to potential abuse and very big possibility to be infected as well...
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Gays raise the best kids...................................................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

An entire population of people shouldn't be oppressed because of something you find icky.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Homosexuality is a sin per the bible and Leviticus and Romans and other verses so to allow it is wrong. The bible clearly states homosexuals are to be put to death.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

This is a list of everyone who the Bible commands must be put to death:1. People who don't listen to Priests.2. Witches3. Homosexuals4. Fortune-tellers5. Anyone who hits their father or mother6. Anyone who curses at their father or mother7. Anyone who cheats on a spouse8. Anyone who commits fornication9. ANYONE WHO IS NOT CHRISTIAN10. Atheists11. False Prophets12. The entire population of any town if one person within the town worships  another god.13. Anyone who is not a virgin before marriage.14. Anyone who commits Blasphemy.15. Anyone who works on the SabbathGod Himself also killed many, and I assume you would believe that the crimes they committed are wrong:16. Any child of a sinner17. The death of all the first born in EgyptThere are more and more, check out the link at the end of this page. The source is truly the Bible, so I believe you will find this an acceptable argument. Source: http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm and you know, the Bible
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

9. ANYONE WHO IS NOT CHRISTIANI think you mean Jewish, because New Testament doesn't command anyone to be put to death, that I know of.People should realize that there is a reason why OT and NT are so much different.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

ANYONE WHO IS NOT CHRISTIANHow can you be Christian if it was before Jesus Christ was born in 4 BC?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Hooray!!!!!!First man on the moonbat................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

no dey have no such xperience dat can help dem to handle da child
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

dey cant breastfeed which is vry imp for phsical development of kids
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Okay so the inability to breastfeed means they can not adopt children who are older than infants?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Even though this arguement has nothing to do with your ability to be a parent, I don't think they should. I have nothing against them, I'm fine with it because it isn't my business, but, if they adopt think about the impact happening on the child thing adopt. That child may face bullying because of this and may be treated differently, I have heard of cases that the child is treated as dirt by both kids and PARENTS, particularly in high school and college when the child is more independent and alone in the world. This may lead to suicide for the child.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

child may face bullying because of this and may be treated differently Well then why don't you teach your shitty kids not to bully someone for being different?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

That's like saying we shouldn't allow women in the military because they may be raped. Stop blaming the victims and work on fixing the antagonists.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

We shouldn't allow women in the military because THEY DO get raped. One in three females in the military have been sexually assaulted. If your worldview breaks down whenever it is challenged you should change it.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

No because no.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I wish a moderate would delete your response because it's not even an argument.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Why should I? So I can get in to a long debate with someone who won't change there mind? Fuck off!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

What the fuck are you talking about? YOU ARE ON A FUCKING DEBATING WEBSITE. Thats what people COME ON HERE TO DO. If you don't like debating people then you don't belong on this website you. Why don't you go to www.godhatesfags.com where you can express your opinion without intelligent conversion.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Why don't you fuck off you stupid cunt?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Oh why thats VERY mature.................................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Oh really? Gee.. thanks, man.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

I usually debate, but in this debate I just wanted my opinion to be known and I know this is the kind of debate with two totally different mind sets and I don't feel like debating with you.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Well I'm not looking for opinions that consist of 3 words. I joined this website after leaving another debate website because I was looking for intelligent conversion. Not just random 3 word answers followed by insults (cunt? seriously? Who the fuck still uses that word?) and why did you even get so angry in the first place? All I did was say you didn't post an argument on a DEBATE website, therefor it should have been deleted (hence the 50 character or more rule). And you got so angry. I usually debateBullshit. What I'm responding to is the longest post in your last 10 most recent post. So fuck you.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

No not bullshit! I'm debating you right now!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

That's kind of the reason you would join a debate site, you know, to debate.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Really? Now I have learned something today....
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Here are some well-known facts:1. Male homosexuals make up for about 3% of the population.2. In about 30% of child molestation cases, the victim is a boy.3. 97% of all child molestation is committed by men.The consequence:Male homosexuals are at least 10 times more likely to molest boys than other population groups.It is not normal that this sexual minority is allowed to adopt children.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

2. In about 30% of child molestation cases, the victim is a boy.You may be interested to know the majority of people that sexually abuse boys are heterosexual in terms of their sexual relationships with children. Being that its often the father that sexual abuses children, it is not surprising that he is straight.You are probably the most intelligent anti-gay person I've encountered and sometimes I find your arguments quite convincing. However when I read how you twist statistics to your own end I find it disappointing. You're intelligent enough to realise that they don't support your arguments which leads me to believe they're your deliberately misrepresenting statistics.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

You may be interested to know the majority of people that sexually abuse boys are heterosexual in terms of their sexual relationships with children.Yes, this is the best defense LGBT activists have been able to put up on this subject: That men who molest boys are heterosexual. If you look closely at this pseudo-theoretical claim, you will soon see just how absurd it is. Of course they are homosexual, or at least bisexual. The victim's age does not change that fact at all.You are probably the most intelligent anti-gay person I've encountered and sometimes I find your arguments quite convincing.Thank you. I feel I must treat this subject seriously, because for me this is more about being pro-human rights than anti-gay. In my view, the LGBT movement is discrediting the very concept of human rights. This is very bad for my country, because it gives a green light to political nutcases who disrespect that concept in principle.However when I read how you twist statistics to your own end I find it disappointingI was not trying to twist statistics. If you have arguments in favor of the idea that some of the men who molest boys are straight, I am ready to listen and I can change my point of view if I see the truth is on your side.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Yes, this is the best defense LGBT activists have been able to put up on this subject: That men who molest boys are heterosexual. If you look closely at this pseudo-theoretical claim, you will soon see just how absurd it is. Of course they are homosexual, or at least bisexual. The victim's age does not change that fact at all.You have a point that of course people that abuse male children are homosexual by definition. However, my point was that you can't say that those that we know are sexually attracted to men are more likely to sexually abuse male children. It is the case that the people that appear to us as heterosexual (in terms of the adult relationships they form) are more likely to abuse. Therefore, there is not a basis for banning people from adopting that seem to us to be homosexual.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

However, my point was that you can't say that those that we know are sexually attracted to men are more likely to sexually abuse male children. It is the case that the people that appear to us as heterosexual (in terms of the adult relationships they form) are more likely to abuse.You are right, many of them are married and appear to be heterosexual.However, in my view the main factors here are:1. These people just have easier access to children.2. There is a higher chance of their crime eventually being discovered.But the fact remains: among these offenders, the rate of male homosexuals is very disproportional.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

You're username should probably ditch the "a" and the "s".97% of child molestation is committed by men? Last I knew there were men in heterosexual couples to, and single fathers. In about 30% of molestation cases, the victim is a boy? That contradicts your argument because 70% are females or unreported....And what does gays being 3% of the population have to do with anything? So they are made to be the minority? You also site no sources.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

You're username should probably ditch the "a" and the "s".So what if I'm a Bigot?97% of child molestation is committed by men? Last I knew there were men in heterosexual couples to, and single fathers.How is the second sentence related to the first one?In about 30% of molestation cases, the victim is a boy? That contradicts your argument because 70% are females or unreported....Are you dorked? In 30% cases, the VICTIM is a boy, in the remaining 70% the victim is a GIRL. What's so hard to understand here?And what does gays being 3% of the population have to do with anything? So they are made to be the minority? It has to do with the essense of the question. Only 3% of male population accounts for 28% of all man-boy molestation. That means gay men are several times likely to be pedophiles.This information is well-known.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Being Gay is not, and will never be normal. Not a good foundation for a child to be raised on.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Are fucking stupid? If you were born gay I'm sure you'd think differently... can you list any study that shows being gay is wrong in anyway. Not from the bible (;
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

But, he WASN'T born gay. There is nothing normal about faggotry. There is a reason why it has been vilified for thousands of years.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

There is hardly any measure of right or wrong the two sides of this debate would agree on. Your question is invalid.The same scientific communities that have so heavily invested into the idea that you are born gay are finding that pedophiles have a similar drive towards sex with children. If so, are you willing to fight all social mores against pedophilia? Are you willing to not only legalize pedophilia, but advocate it? I am guessing not.Pedophilia causes medical harm, so do homosexual males.Pedophilia is not conducive towards reproduction, homosexuality certainly is not.Pedophilia is corrosive to the family, so is homosexuality.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

a child needs to grow up with a male and female role model
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

So? A man can't be maternal? A woman can't be paternal?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

No. Believe it or not a man can not be a woman and a woman can not be a man.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

There's a difference between having MASCULINE qualities, being MALE.There's a difference between having FEMININE qualities, and being FEMALE.Believe it or not, people are individuals.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

A male can certainly try to imitate a female or vice versa, such an imitation is not a positive influence on a child. If a child is female, she should be proud of that fact and embrace it. She should not be confused between what nature says and what her flamboyant second dad acts like.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Here's what's wrong with this argument:A male can certainly try to imitate a female or vice versaTo start off, most people who act feminine/masculine, usually ARE feminine/masculine. Not all men are perfectly masculine and not all women are perfectly feminine.such an imitation is not a positive influence on a child.See above, also, men with feminine qualities rarely behave in a completely feminine manner.If a child is female, she should be proud of that fact and embrace it.Sure, but a person shouldn't be forced to alter their personality or tastes solely because of biology.She should not be confused between what nature says and what her flamboyant second dad acts like.To start off, not all gays act in an effeminate manner. While many certainly do, that's more of a comedic stereotype than reality.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

How do you feel about single parents? Also do you have any study that shows the repercussions to back up your claim?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

The optimal, and only parental situation that should be encouraged, is a child being raised with their own mother and their own father who are married. Here are just a few statistics to back that up....
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

How do you know that having 2 parents is the reason, and not just having man and women like you claim? You are comparing single parent homes to gay homes. How do you know they will be the same?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

A single parent necessarily lacks either a male parent or a female parent, as does a homosexual household.