azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Ok, if you want to spread the gospel of JC... just down voting accomplishes nothing. How does going up to someone, down voting them, and then saying nothing spread any gospel of any kind? That is just spreading negativity and hate. However, seeing as you have a need to spread the gospel, I assume you follow every rule in the Bible.FOR EXAMPLE:God says: "if anyone touches an unclean thing... and it is hidden from him, and he has become unclean, he shall be guilty". (Lev. 5:2) And "If anyone sins, doing any of the things which the Lord has commanded not to be done, though he does not know it, yet he is guilty." (Lev. 5:17)So, basically, if you have committed anything on the following list you are guilty. If a man is found sleeping with another man’s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. (Deuteronomy 22)So, why aren't you going out after anyone who has had an affair? Why focus on those who are homosexual?12 “If you hear in one of your cities, which the Lord your God is giving you to dwell there, 13 that certain worthless fellows have gone out among you and have drawn away the inhabitants of their city, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods,’ which you have not known, 14 then you shall inquire and make search and ask diligently. And behold, if it be true and certain that such an abomination has been done among you, 15 you shall surely put the inhabitants of that city to the sword, devoting it to destruction,[a] all who are in it and its cattle, with the edge of the sword. (Deuteronomy)So, I assume, that whenever you find a city or society following a different religion that the one you follow, you kill them all? The gospel of Jesus Christ commands it.Leviticus 10:6 says: “Uncover not your heads, neither rend your clothes; lest ye die, and lest wrath come upon all the people.”So, I assume that you never wear ripped jeans, or any clothes with any tears or rips or anything wrong with them. If one did, they would be dead. And there would be wrath placed upon all of the people.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The point here is that there are some outrageous things in the Bible. It's not all meant to be read or taken into extremes. In fact, some of it may even be ignored without disastrous consequences. The idea of homosexuality being an abomination is NO LONGER RELEVANT in today's society. If you want, we can have a Challenge Debate and talk about this more. Yes, I know you are a bit of a troll(at least, according to most everyone on this site), but I'd be willing to have an actual debate with you.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

So, I assume, that whenever you find a city or society following a different religion that the one you follow, you kill them all? The gospel of Jesus Christ commands it.Not a single one of those verses comes from New Testament. Jesus was not in Old Testament.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

He is also the spammer11902 account.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Who is this JC you talk about !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Why are you disputing me? Are you the troll responsible? There is a user by the name Jc41218. He is pro Christianity and anti gay. He likes to downvote like crazy and make fake accounts. He is all of the crazy pro religious spammer accounts.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Sorry I didn't mean too I just wanted to know who you were talking about.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Yeah, he is just some random guy. He was kind of normal, but he went off the reservation and hasn't recovered.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Sure! As long as they don't like fucking animals or nasty stuff like that.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Sure! As long as they don't like fucking animals or nasty stuff like that.Gays are worse
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Your avatar is a little gay sooooooo....
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Well, that is a stoooopid argument.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Of course. There is nothing wrong with being gay. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Of course. There is nothing wrong with being gay. .Leviticus 20:13 and Romans 1:26 etc.....
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

That is your religious interpretation of texts written over 2000 years ago, not fact. The law should not be based on religious opinions or delusions.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

That is your religious interpretation of texts written over 2000 years ago, not fact. The law should not be based on religious opinions or delusions.We should be a theocracy.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

No we shouldn't. That would be a violation of civil rights. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

That is your religious interpretation of texts written over 2000 years ago, not fact. The law should not be based on religious opinions or delusions.The bible is the source for all morality. If your a true Christian you would oppose it!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

If your a true Christian, you would support it. No true Scotsman fallacy. Disagreeing with your religious opinion does not make me an unbeliever. Jesus is the author and the finisher of my faith, not you, so who are you to play God? Did you die on the cross for my sins? No, so stop this madness. Some references: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NotrueScotsman http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/NoTrueScotsman https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman  http://www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/no-true-scotsman/  http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/136-no-true-scotsman
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

4Real what you are not getting is according to your religion being gay is a sin and if you are not following it you are probably not FOLLOWING it. That has nothing to due about no true scotsman
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

That again is your religious interpretation of the Biblical faith, not the faith its self. Your saying Im against the faith does not make it so, and it is the no true scotsman fallacy. If you start out with "no true such and such", you are committing the no true scotsman fallacy. Im not at all threatened by your proclaimations of my alleged unbelief, and my faith is authored and finished by Jesus who died on the cross, not someone random person like you who needs training in logical debate.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.What does this sound like to you?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.I'm interested in what the other guy said. How is it that you can be pro-gay relationships when the Bible says this? How do you interpret this clause?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I could be about cult prostitution. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Do you really believe that? It seems to be quite clearly talking about homosexuality to me...
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I dont agree. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Of course. There is nothing wrong with being gay.Read your bible.....
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Read your as well. i prefer the NKJV personally. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Read your as well. i prefer the NKJV personally. .Romans 1:26 and other bible verses clearly condemn it.http://www.gotquestions.org/gay-marriage.html http://www.gotquestions.org/marriage-equality.html http://www.gotquestions.org/homosexuality-Bible.html http://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-homosexuality.html
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Thats your interpretation of the Bible, not fact. Homosexuality cannot be a ssin because people do not choose to be gay.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Thats your interpretation of the Bible, not fact. Homosexuality cannot be a ssin because people do not choose to be gay.What do those verses mean then......
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

There is...Homosexuality is a mental disorder. Its a disease. Would you risk innocent children to be exposed to potential abuse and very big possibility to be infected as well...
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Homosexuality is not a disease. There is nothing wrong with two consenting adults spending the rest of their lives together. Total strawman.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

So that means I can be with my dog because most animals can consent and dogs are one of them.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

False analagy fallacy. That is a seperate issue. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Why wouldn't they be allowed to adopt? A child will still grow and mature properly with gay parents.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

What does sexuality have to do with the ability to take care of children?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Everything. Are homosexuals able to natrually reproduce? If nature determined a homosexual relationship is a valid setting to raise a child it probably would have made concessions for them.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Are homosexuals able to natrually reproduce? Yes they are. They are gay, not impotent.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

...pretty incredible that you failed to get the point of what I was saying.... Lets bring this down to typical liberal moron level... Can a man make a baby with a man? Can a woman reproduce with another woman? Get it?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I understand the point you were trying to make. You aren't exactly treading new ground in your bigotry. And like a million angry, humorless God-botherers before you, you miss a few obvious points. 1. Sexual orientation does not determine one's ability to parent. There are countless cold, abusive, irresponsible, unattentive straight parents out there.Everyone walks into parenthood with different experience levels. Somebody who was the oldest of 6 children, as well as baby-sitting for their nephews and neices will be more experienced in raises children and more prepared to deal with the chaos than, say, an only-child.2. There are plenty of people who either didn't realize they were gay until adulthood, or buried it down due to social expectations and went on to have children. Every day they do the work of parent based on their own merits. Their sexual preference plays very little role in it. In fact, it plays very little role in ANY aspect of their life, aside from who they are attracted to.How formative is sexual orientation on YOUR character? How much does being straight have any freakin' affect on ANYTHING you do aside from your romantic pursuits? You said if nature wanted it, it would have made concessions. If nature abhorred homosexuality, there wouldn't be any gays for us to debate about, or they wouldn't have any interest in raising children anyway. I imagine there are plenty of gay men who are more willing and able to play the role of father than I am.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Sexual orientation does not determine one's ability to parent.On the contrary, if you are a homosexual you lack the moral foundation to even control yourself, more or less other people. https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02Decades after the discovery of AIDS, they still account for over half of the new aids cases even though they are only like 2% of the population. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/facts/index.html They can't even live with themselves, why bring other people into it?http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447240/ Their sexual preference plays very little role in itI could agree with that, but their sexual practices do. In fact, it plays very little role in ANY aspect of their life, aside from who they are attracted to.See the links aboveHow formative is sexual orientation on YOUR character?Very little, because my faith would trump any bizarre sexual desires a may or may not have. My satisfaction from exercising self control is superior to any sexual fulfillment. If nature abhorred homosexuality, there wouldn't be any gays for us to debate abouthttp://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/facts/index.html
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Decades after the discovery of AIDS, they still account for over half of the new aids cases even though they are only like 2% of the population. 1. This is much less true of lesbians. Would you be more inclined to allow them to adopt?2. Okay, so don't allow couples with AIDS to adopt. 3. This is only concerning sexual activity. Does not say a word about other aspects of their lives. How many straight parents have had affairs or other sexual indiscretions? Should they too be banned from parenthood?4. There are biological reasons why gays are much more likely to transmit AIDS via sexual activity. It has nothing to do with self control. Very little, because my faith would trump any bizarre sexual desires a may or may not have.That's pretty easy to say when you were born finding members of the opposite sex attractive.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Yes, why not? They are just like us straight people-except they love their own type so yeah sure they arent aliens or anything
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

why shouldn't they their just like humans like we are but choos the same gender it shouldn't even matter it's their life not yours
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Yes, it is their choice what they want to do.... Except they are dragging a third person in the middle of it.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

If they can provide for the needs of the child and be able to shape them into good individuals then they are eligible to do so.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

All liberals lack that ability, especially homosexuals. You lack the ability to teach ethics that actually have meaning.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Sexuality is only a small factor in teaching ethics. Maturity, educational attainment, experience and the like play a bigger role in teaching ethics. Would you rather have an illiterate straight couple rather than an educated homosexual couple who can provide you what you need?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Would you rather have an illiterate straight couple rather than an educated homosexual couple who can provide you what you need?What a stupid thing to say. You know it is possible to be both educated and straight right? Do you know the two don't have anything to do with eachother? You say that as if you have to pull a kid iut of a few years of middle school to train them to be straight.Sexuality is only a small factor in teaching ethics.Reeeeaaaaallllyyy? So I guess I should never bother to explain to my sons that "no means no?" Any age girl is fair game? And if they get pregnant they should just run off and find someone else ASAP. I'll make sure my daughters never learn that by being irresponsible, she could be robbing her child of a chance to have a decent father and a whole family. It is better to go around tracking down 15 different men for paternity tesets just hoping for some child support.Only a COMPLETE MORON would evere think to say what you just said. Short of murder, there is no bigger crime a man can committ than a sexual crime.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Obviously you are a narrow minded person. You said it yourself that being educated and straight does`t have to do anything with each other therefore why restrict an educated homosexual to adopt if they are worthy to do so. Let me make another example that even a person like you can understand. Who would you rather be with in a room, a straight murderer or a homosexual who has good morals? In these times gender is only a small factor in the thinking of man. Nurture plays a bigger role than a nature in the decisions of an individual in our society. Try improving your argument rather than putting stupid and moron in your arguments. You only sound like a sore loser.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Try improving your argument rather than putting stupid and moron in your arguments. You only sound like a sore loser.Oh I pretty well buried you before calling you a moron. You didn't even try to defend what you said.Have you thought about why you have to add in another factor to try to justify giving children away to homosexuals?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I have already disputed your statements before. Therefore you clearly are`t paying attention to what my arguments are about. I was only adding additional scenarios for you to understand how little does gender play in the morality of a person. Reeeeaaaaallllyyy? So I guess I should never bother to explain to my sons that "no means no?" Any age girl is fair game? And if they get pregnant they should just run off and find someone else ASAP. I'll make sure my daughters never learn that by being irresponsible, she could be robbing her child of a chance to have a decent father and a whole family. It is better to go around tracking down 15 different men for paternity tesets just hoping for some child support.This statement dose`t even make sense. The topic is about homosexuals being involved in adoption not straight people letting their children be adopted. The moment for an example your child gives your grandchild to the orphanage as per your statement, there is no certainty that your grandchild would have a decent home even with straight people. As for your daughter`s case what if she is`t just ready? Would you rather risk her and her child`s future just to be a family even though they would only end up in poverty?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I don't see why not. It doesn't matter if your bisexual or what ever y'all call it. I believe its ok and there is no reason why they shouldn't be able to.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Yes, because Hitler is good and will always be good     h i t l e r
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Yes, I believe homosexuals should be able to adopt children because they can live their own lives, and if they feel that they are ready to deal with a child long-term, then absolutely. It's really the same decision as woman-man marriage, except that they have the ability to produce their own child with their DNA, but that should not discourage a couple of the same sex. All hail decisions.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Yes because just like others they are human beings we cannot just judge them on who they love. We have no right stop two people who are gay from loving each other. Just because they are gay does this mean they are not allowed to adopt a child. Every human being is equal in this world so why should we differentiate the fact that these people are gay and cannot adopt a child!!!!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

There are many people in the world who are against adoption at all. There are tons of homosexual couples that could adopt and give the children a loving home. I'm not sure why some places don't allow that. Basically, they're denying that child a safe and loving home which could be an even better home than the orphanage or foster home.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Affection of love is love no matter who shows it hence the reason that people adopt instead of having their own children. Example Oliver TwistTom sawyer n many more
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

All that matters is that some child has two loving parents who love he or she.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

The level of moronity in your argument is actually impressive.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

And your proof is where?....................................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Homosexuals live 20 years less than the average normal heterosexual male*
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

If that's a statistic, then I have a number of arguments against it. Although my main counter argument to your point is that even if this were true, how does this relate to the stance against homosexuals being allowed to adopt?
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

His point was, that the Gays would die so soon, that the adopted kids would be put back up for adoption anyway.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Source for this statistic? And explain to me how this statistic knew that men who stayed in the closet were gay so that they could include them in this stat.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

So what?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

Is downvoting your only argument?..............................
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Are fallacies your only argument? .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

He did not commit a fallacy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I know. I confess that you are right. I was trolling. Im sorry. .
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

Compared with children raised by their married biological parents (IBF), children of homosexual parents (LM and GF)This is the flaw. It is clear that children with adoptive parents are more likely to suffer than those from traditional families. Children are adopted when taken into care. They are taken into care for a reason and are often damaged by things that they have suffered at the hands of their parents.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

All of your sources just sound like well qualified critics who didn't like what the article said... I clicked through your links and links of links and didn't find anyone disputing the data. The only possibly valid criticism is that parents who simply had a gay relationship at some time were considered gay parents... What is so wrong with that? The results still show that they were unfit parents and the optimal situation for a child is to live with their own mother and their own father who are married... Find me a study to dispute that, instead of people upset that their own studies run contrary to their worldview.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: Yes because

I think you missed the part where they disputed their data and showed their errors.
Debate: Should Gays Be Allowed To Adopt?
Side: NO because

I think you missed the part where they disputed their data and showed their errors.Maybe I did, where was that at?