Debate: Should Abortions be allowed in the USA?
Side: Of course!

First and foremost, 'God' does not represent an objective, absolute moral standard. There have been countless gods worshipped throughout history, and every single one has a different moral code.Who cares whether there have been countless gods worshipped? Bad argument.Even amongst those who worship the same god, the moral code understood can vary significantly between different branches of the religion. In the Abrahamic religions, compare the moral codes outlined by Judaism, Islam, and Christianity respectively- QUITE different.Those are different religions... Muslims deny the authenticity and inherency of the Bible. Jews don't even follow their own book, saying that it is out dated. Christians are the only ones who actually try to obey the Bible, with reason. Bad argument.Within Christianity alone, compare the moral codes between a Catholic Church and a Southern Baptist one- AGAIN quite different.Catholics are not Christians. And yet again.. who cares whether they have different views on what God has established as moral? Who cares? This is the same point about governments.. they each try to interpret what the absolutes are... who cares that they have differences. Bad argument.1) Which God, of the countless ones that have been worshipped throughout human history, do you feel is the 'real' one?Christian God.2) Do you have any evidence for the existence of this specific God?Irrelevant. 2+2=4 regardless as to whether or not you believe in the number 2. But even so, yes I do.3) Which interpretation of this specific God do you adhere to?Christianity. Christianity is one. Heresy has been widespread in the church, and it is condemned widely.4) Do you have any further evidence that suggests that this specific interpretation is the correct one?The Bible.5) Do the writings in the sect/subset/denomination of this religion specifically decry abortion, or is this interpretation and extrapolation?Yes.You've got a pretty sizeable burden of proof to demonstrate that this absolute moral standard exists, and that the morals are in line with what you suggest.Not at all. Much of the burden of proof you want me to answer is not relevant to the statement, "God is the basis of absolute moral law." Its called a red herring.And even through all that, there are still holes in it.There are no holes in it.The moral law in this case would still not be objective, but subjective to the deity in question.That does not follow. Absolute and objective means that it applies to everyone, regardless as to what one thinks. God's moral objective and absolute law applies to everyone, including Himself, His nature actually being the basis for it. The Euthyphro dilemma has been disposed off in modern times. It has been for a long while, actually. Study up on it.You still won't have established a case for your 'no' vote to this debate; we have specific legislation barring enforcing a religion upon people- as such, if the only reason for your 'No' vote is 'god said so,' then yes, abortions should be allowed in the USA.Do I care what the United States says?So all in all, you have no presented any argument, asked question that are red herrings, and need to study up some more on the philosophy of religion.