azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

so how about we all do that. I don't think any male would want to give up there rights unless there a homosexual or something. what do you mean overpopulation of animals studys show that there is no real overpopulation of animals. there is only a overpopulation of a species. so the bigest species population would really be humans. so lets pick dog species. way are we neutering dogs when there species is not overpopulation. studys show there is 317,000,000 humans in america and there is 73,000,000 dogs in america so why are we neutering dogs? and there is 76,000,000 cats in america so why are we neutering cats? even add them together we humans are the real overpopulation. so why aren't we neutering humans?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

First of all, not everyone in America wants to take care of a cat/dog. From this point of view, there is overpopulation of animals because the amount of them is greater than the amount of people able or willing to take care of them. And yes humans are overpopulated, but I don't think anyone is going to willingly consent to being neutered/spayed. Besides, there would be so many other complications forcing people to get neutered/spayed (who would do it? How would it be enforced?).
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

And yes humans are overpopulated, but I don't think anyone is going to willingly consent to being neutered/spaded. Besides, there would be so many other complications forcing people to get neutered/spaded (who would do it? How would it be enforced?).you made my point people would not want to do it and by forcing them it is wrong. so neutering is wrong. From this point of view, there is overpopulation of animals because the amount of them is greater than the amount of people able or willing to take care of them.But just like I stated there is no real overpopulation of dogs or cats. there is points of view but no matter what they are not overpopulated. so it is wrong to neuter. even spaying is wrong.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

you made my point people would not want to do it and by forcing them it is wrong. so neutering is wrong.------------------------------------------------------------------ Neutering isn't necessarily wrong. As I previously stated, it helps control populations. The problem with humans however is that nobody will willingly submit to it. Making the conclusion that because a person will not submit it must be completely wrong, is illogical. To also clarify, I do not support the spaying of humans as it easily infringes upon their recognizable well being. Animals are different though; they do not have the capacity to realize what has happened. To simplify, animals that have been neutered will not care that they've been neutered. They will feel temporary pain after the procedure but that is all. Humans on the other hand will care and will feel the complications down the road (wanting to be father, not being able to).Like seriously, have you ever heard an animal say "I wish I could have pups/kittens but I got neutered"? The answer is no. But with humans, it would be quite the opposite. ====================================================== But just like I stated there is no real overpopulation of dogs or cats. there is points of view but no matter what they are not overpopulated.-------------------------------------------------------------- I have already given my reason as to why there is. So now tell me, for the animals that nobody can take care of/nobody wants to take care of, should we just release all of them into the wild? Let them fend for themselves? Possibly let them breed so much and that we will be up to our shoulders in cats and dogs? I'd love to see your answer.========================================== so it is wrong to neuter. even spaying is wrong.---------------------------------No it is not.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Neutering isn't necessarily wrong. As I previously stated, it helps control populations. The problem with humans however is that nobody will willingly submit to it. Making the conclusion that because a person will not submit it must be completely wrong, is illogical.............................. controling the population what population. it is logical to guss that if we would say no they would say no. And a human is a animal we are no different. just because they can't say no they still show that they don't like it.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

controling the population what population.-----------------------------------The population of cats and dogs. ===============================And a human is a animal we are no different.----------------------------------------- Oh really? Then why don't we go naked and live in a forest or jungle?======================================just because they can't say no they still show that they don't like it.-------------------------------------------------------- Yes, animals don't like it at first. They feel pain from the procedure, but it goes away. Animals also forget the mental/emotional distress, while humans do not.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Oh really? Then why don't we go naked and live in a forest or jungle?................I did not mean to say that I say we are different but the same.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Yes, animals don't like it at first. They feel pain from the procedure, but it goes away. Animals also forget the mental/emotional distress, while humans do not.............animals don't forget mental/emotional distress, they will still feel the pain when they have sex.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

To also clarify, I do not support the spaying of humans as it easily infringes upon their recognizable well being. Animals are different though; they do not have the capacity to realize what has happened. To simplify, animals that have been neutered will not care that they've been neutered. They will feel temporary pain after the procedure but that is all. Humans on the other hand will care and will feel the complications down the road (wanting to be father, not being able to).......................Animals are capacity to realize something has been done to them that they don't like. a female dog will feel just how a female human would feel down the road. animals do care if they been neutered.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

a female dog will feel just how a female human would feel down the road. animals do care if they been neutered.---------------------------------------------------------- Please explain how a female dog and a female human would feel the same. And animals do not care. Have you seen an animal become horribly depressed from not having the ability to reproduce? The answer is no.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Please explain how a female dog and a female human would feel the same. And animals do not care. Have you seen an animal become horribly depressed from not having the ability to reproduce? The answer is no...............yes the answer is yes studys do show that a animal can become depressed if she feels that she can't reproduce. they would feel same but they will show it in different ways but about the same thing.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Like seriously, have you ever heard an animal say "I wish I could have pups/kittens but I got neutered"? The answer is no. But with humans, it would be quite the opposite. ......................I will samply say yes animals would say it if they can. so by taking away there rights it would be wrong.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

I will samply say yes animals would say it if they can.-------------------------------------------------------------- How the fuck do you know?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

How the fuck do you know?......................because humans would say it so best guss they would say it. And they still can say it in there language.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

I have already given my reason as to why there is. So now tell me, for the animals that nobody can take care of/nobody wants to take care of, should we just release all of them into the wild? Let them fend for themselves? Possibly let them breed so much and that we will be up to our shoulders in cats and dogs? I'd love to see your answer. .................. I say don't be stupid. it easy to think will I shouldn't put a male with a unspayed female if I don't want puppies or kittens. I mean come on even kids know that. And we would have no problem with population.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

I say don't be stupid.--------------------------------------Do I really need to critique your lack of grammatical skill to disprove this?==================================it easy to think will I shouldn't put a male with a unspayed female if I don't want puppies or kittens. I mean come on even kids know that. And we would have no problem with population.----------------------------------------------------------------- Are you saying that as long as we don't put unneutered pets together there will be no overpopulation? So then how are we supposed to keep animals apart? Lock them in our houses forever?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Are you saying that as long as we don't put unneutered pets together there will be no overpopulation? So then how are we supposed to keep animals apart? Lock them in our houses forever?...............I say don't be stupid. no let them out just watch them or buy a fence or just spay your female. it easy
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

No it is not.................... so neutering is wrong.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

facepalmI'm not going to debate with you on this topic anymore. You have already shown your inability to properly counter-argue.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Sometimes... you just have to give up. :P
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

sure like you have I am doing a better job then you. and you give up because you know that neutering is wrong
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

I don't think that it is. It doesn't lower the quality of life for the animal (it can still have sex, so it's firing blank rounds). You can't control dog reproduction in the same fashion that you can with humans, it's one one the few ways that you can keep it under control.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

study show that it can hurt them when they have sex after they been neutered. it still is there right to keep whats there's.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

study show that it can hurt them when they have sex after they been neutered.Citations?it still is there right to keep whats there's.Can animals own property?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Only if human contraception is wrong, and it aint. .
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

You're saying its okay for someone to cut out your reproductive organs?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

I was giving an analagy, hun. Spaying and neutering is contraception for animals. As a prochoice person, I would never think that contraception and abortion are wrong. We talked about this on DDO, remember?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Your assertion is that neutering is wrong only if human contraception is wrong.Neutering has nothing to do with 'pro-choice'. An animal doesn't choose to be neutered.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Correct. I was giving an analagy and it went wrong, my dear.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Ok well out of respect for the posting of the question maybe you want to give it another go.Is neutering wrong?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

I feel that sterilizing animals is good because it controls the animal population, therefore there are more resources to provide for animals, and less animals are euthanized. Is that better?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

feel that sterilizing animals is good because it controls the animal population, studys show that there is no real overpopulation of animals. there is only a overpopulation of a species. so the bigest species population would really be humans. so lets pick dog species. way are we neutering dogs when there species is not overpopulation. studys show there is 317,000,000 humans in america and there is 73,000,000 dogs in america so why are we neutering dogs? and there is 76,000,000 cats in america so why are we neutering cats? even add them together we humans are the real overpopulation. so why aren't we neutering humans?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Can you prove the globalist myth of overpopulation generated by the UN under Agenda 21?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

myth I just looked at the top ten websites and most of them show up to date. on what I just put down I don't need to prove anything it is easy to look up. make sure there update !!!
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

I see that you are not proving your claims. .
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

why should I have to when it is sample for you to prove my claims. just look up (what is the population of dogs in america or something like that
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Your argument disproven. .
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

please my argument has not been disproven that one website out of ten
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

It has though. you claimed that Agenda 21 is a myth, and I just proved that it exists. I'm not trying to be rude, but I disagree.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

oww sorry I did not mean to say it was a myth. but I read everything I put down the best number.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Its all good. .
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

but still why do you think we should be able to take away there rights to there body. I don't see a right in taking away someone rights.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Mon cher, mon cher, I was making an analagy, albeit, a poor one. My aopologies.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

ok I am sorry please forgive me. bvgfdcy4 fhgd hrz 6df fxff
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

No worries. We are cool. :)
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Hold on answer me this do you have a man in your life. please answer
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

None of your business. .
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

I thought that if you did neuter your pet it would help them not be crazy? I could be thinking of something else though....?
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

No it would be crazy to neuter them because it'it's wrong for many of reasons.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

alternative would be tons of unwanted animals.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

No if you vasectomy them then there would be no overpopulation.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Animals are not people, people are not animals. neutering animals is ok because they can be owned and controlled by people. People can not be owned. You can do anything you want to an animal, short of torturing them or raping them. Also, dogs are often used for work (bomb sniffing, helping the disabled), having to worry about controlling their reproductive urges is not possible in those situation.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

We are animals and also in some country's you can own people so are you saying just because we can neuter them.It wrong to use them as whatever and then just keep on down sizing them and also people have reproductive urges to that can't be controlled in different situations too.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

We are animals and also in some country's you can own people so are you saying just because we can neuter them.That is not what I am saying at all. I'm saying owning humans is immoral because there is a difference between a human being and an animal, thus owning a human and then castrating him would also be immoral.Animals are simply slaves to instinct, they have no soul, they are not self aware, they can not contemplate their existence and make a decision besides one based on survival or training.Human beings are self aware, are capable of discarding instinct or training, we have a soul. Our behaviors are dissimilar than any other known species. At the end of the day, everyone has the ability to decide what is right and what is wrong. I suggest you use that capability better, before you find yourself dying alone, drowning in a pool of your own shame.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Animals are simply slaves to instinct,False.they have no soul,May or may not be false. they are not self aware,Most definitely false.they can not contemplate their existence and make a decision besides one based on survival or training.False as well.Our behaviors are dissimilar than any other known species.Incorrect as well.2/10, try again.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

All the things that you just stated its truly false and if your believes are getting in the way of this than I think you should give up because your not going to win.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Of course. Lets just let the animal population explode leading to the depletion of resources, leading to several animals being killed. End satire.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

Don't be stupid lets just lower are population and then there be like no overpopulation and also we can vasectomy them.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: no it not wrong

Yes there is. The animal population neeeds to be regulated. You just want more dogs to fuck.
Debate: is neutering/spaying wrong
Side: it is wrong

No because we need to be regulated and until that happens there will always going to be a overpopulation of animals and if your just trying to lower the animal population than just vasectomy them.
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: Against obama

I wanted to believe he would be a good president, but he is likely the worst! He has not had a budget in 3.5 years, passes illegal legislation, and has a poor policy on terror.Damn, I wish I could get paid like he does to suck so badly!
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: For obama

passses illegal legislation? what in Gods name are you on about? hes been infinitely more effective on terror than bush
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: Against obama

SO, abandoning war efforts before the country is ready to take over and instead letting the terrorists take over and prevail is being more effective on terror? Not a chance!
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: For obama

abandoning weve been in afghanistan for 11 years, iraq for nearly as long, how long do you want these wars to last>? at least obama got the head terrorists and bin laden and ghadaffi unlike bush who got no one. its time to leave and rebuild the nation at home
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: For obama

lets see what others did? talk up war with violent propoganda and incite all our enemies....label the middle east an axis of evil? thats some mindless way to promote peace, then use the dodgy dossier and its endless lies about weapons of mass destruction which never even existed. then use the war tv channels to promote the war agenda in order to make more money for coroporate weapons producers etc etc the game is up the whole world sees this the disgusting charade the rpeublicans have become and I am a right winger myself by these evil scum disgust me. theyd blow up the world to make moneyweve been in afghanistan 11 years nearly 12. were still there for a few more years. how much is enough? iraq not far off, thousands and thousands of americans died, 1 million iraqis died, thousands of coalition troops and how many more injured or had their lives destroyed over a pack of lies?obama came into the biggest recession for 80 years, a nation wold out and bought off by the corporate giants, 2 unwinnable wars and terrorism on the rise instead of on the fall. obama finished what bush totally failed to do, he got the terrorist leaders, he got ghadaffi, he got bin laden...but he also preached peace , tolerance and negotiation too...war for obama is the last resort not the first. afghanistan has been trained for 11 years. you cannot defeat a nation like that its been tried for centuries. all you can do is improve it, strengthen it, keep a presence there. weve forgotten our mission statement though most soldiers dont even know why we are there anymoreobama wants to create greater peace and respect. he also wnats to make america stronger at home and rebalance the economy. his stable hand has allowed the stock market to double in value in his reign too. so millions have benefitted from obamas more peaceful and measured intelligent approach
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: Against obama

He's not the worst president in US history. Jimmy Carter probably takes the wrap on that one.Obama and Bush have expanded the powers of Federal government the most since FDR. The national debt has increased more under Obama than any other president, and if the Supreme Court doesn't rule Obamacare unconstitutional, the national debt will exceed anything anyone could have dreamed of in the 90s.So I'm very much against the Obama administration, but I wouldn't consider him technically the WORST.
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: For obama

I don't deny that Obama isn't amazing (I only support him now as the best of a bad lot), but with the debt, that's hardly the most accurate way of looking at it.While it is true that the debt has increased under Obama more than anyone else, trillions of that comes from Bush's spending in Iraq/Afghanistan, the payments were delayed so it wouldn't be Bush's problem. LinkIf you look at what the two actually spent, you'll notice a massive difference, and yet people still give Obama responsibility for things that he had no control over. I do not see this as fair in any way.
Debate: Is Obama is the worst president the USA ever had?
Side: Against obama

I should have been more specific.The point is that under 3 years he has created new spending, and he will continue to increase the debt with little mind to how this is a problemThe first article is not false (even though your link claims it is) and the second article explains why. If you're looking for someone who will actually cut spending and the debt, look to Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate.Otherwise, Romney is a slightly less big government hungry version of Obama.