azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

Why are the rules and equipment needed different for two different sports? Oh idk, maybe because they are different sports... maybe.Then tackling shouldn't be allowed in rugby under your logic.If it is stated that they are similar enough to validate the statement "rugby players don't wear helmets" I should not have to ask for the similarities, they should be mentioned from the get go. It's a claim without evidence.It is hilarious that finding the differences is so easy that simply going to google is enough and you don't have to mention the differences, but those pesky similarities have to be spelled out otherwise they aren't failed. Do you know how I spell hypocrite? D-r-a-w-F-o--u-r.Well I assumed you believe you were correct, since you picked a side in the first placeApparently a bad assumption. I can't admit I am wrong if no one asks, can I?but I noticed that even after switching you debated me, on the other side with a condescending reply that was anything but admitting defeat.It is hard to admit defeat when your opponent doesn't want to engage in the debate. That's all I could give you.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: No

My logic didn't state any thing wasn't allowed my logic stated that since they are different it's not valid to say one should or shouldn't have a piece of equipment because the other doesn't or does. According to your logic of my logic, table tennis needs bases because baseball has them.You don't have to admit you're wrong, that'd be asking for too much, but to not reply as if you're correct, makes me wonder.Oh I'm engaged, I'm enjoying this actually XD.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

My logic didn't state any thing wasn't allowed my logic stated that since they are different it's not valid to say one should or shouldn't have a piece of equipment because the other doesn't or does. According to your logic of my logic, table tennis needs bases because baseball has them.Bullshit, under your logic it doesn't make sense for rugby to have tackling. According to my logic it would be ok for table tennis to consider bases which your logic would not.You don't have to admit you're wrong, that'd be asking for too much, but to not reply as if you're correct, makes me wonder.Well, I will let the king of not admitting being wrong keep his throne. My position that football players shouldn't wear helmets is wrong. Long live the king.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: No

That's a laugh, you're a psych professional when you're showing your idiocy on createdebate? Because you often try to tell me what I actually mean, as if I don't know.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

You don't know what you are talking about, so it is as if you don't know. And don't give me that bullshit after doing the same exact thing asshole.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: No

And what bullshit would that be pray tell.I'd also like to know what makes me an asshole.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

Telling someone you know what they mean then complaining that someone could possibly tell you what you mean makes you an asshole. Plus being a hypocrite about differences and similarities is bad too.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: No

If you're saying that I knew what you mean show me where I said I know what you mean, If you're referring to how I said the original commentator was joking, that's not me saying I know what he means that's me saying hyperbole is said in jest, therefore I know it's a joke. He later confirmed... Being a hypocrite about similarities and differences is the only thing one can be a hypocrite about and be considered an asshole?
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

"According to your logic of my logic, table tennis needs bases because baseball has them."Oh, look at that. You doing the same thing you were mad at me for doing.If you're referring to how I said the original commentator was joking, that's not me saying I know what he means that's me saying hyperbole is said in jest, therefore I know it's a joke. He later confirmed...Wrong debate. Hope this helps you realize both debates are you posting bullshit, but I won't hold my breath.Being a hypocrite about similarities and differences is the only thing one can be a hypocrite about and be considered an asshole?No, you could be an asshole in a variety of ways. :)
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: No

Mad at you? What gave you that impression? This pleases me XD. However, what is is that I'm doing, assuming I know your logic? If that's the answer I actually did do that (with an absurd comparison like table tennis and baseball just to take a shot at you).Ha wow, we've been debating so long my arguments are starting to merge, ultimately it's because we're so far off the original debate topic, we're waging our own war over something that must be similar enough that I could mistake one for the other.Ah just wondering.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

Ha wow, we've been debating so long my arguments are starting to mergeBecause it is all shit.ultimately it's becauseWhy do constantly make statements that you know will be wrong. Every time you try to explain something it is wrong.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: No

Because your arguments are starting to sound similar actually.Every single time I try to explain something it's wrong? Are you using hyperbole?
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

Every single time I try to explain something it's wrong? Are you using hyperbole?Was it funny?
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

A little. Not so much because it was hyperbole, but more so because of the context.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

So, now you believe that hyperbole doesn't make it funny? Finally.
Debate: Should football players wear helmets?
Side: Yes

I didn't say it's not I said, not in that context. Context is important.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

better lunch than sport at the day lightbetter supper than sport in the midle of the nightbetter sleep than sport when you are so sleepy
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Spending your life by running on grass, jumping over a stick .......
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Hahahaha.Off tops the best things about sports I can think of are:They keep you in prime physical conditionAnd they teach you about competition; how to kick someones ass and how to deal with having your own ass kickedThey (sometimes) teach teamwork
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

imagine all those transferable skills .... from: .
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

I'd argue that they are, but much like the result on my "is art a waste of time" debate I'll probably be disputed and inevitably on the losing side.I believe it's a waste of time because it's not needed to making our civilization grow.For the health reason you can do other exercises.For the reason of entertainment, which you really can't completely live without their are loads of other activities you could do ranging from eating, to playing video games, to chess.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Well they haven't civilized society but they come from civilized societies. People grow up wanting to be sports players and schools and colleges promote them. Sports is just one way we humans can share our strengths and weaknesses.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

That doesn't constitute, logically, how it's not just a waste of time. By that logic wanting to be a super hero isn't a waste of time, when they don't even exist.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

But we know that's impossible so why would that even have anything to do with this debate? Also I don't see a test of strength as a waste of time because anything can be called a waste of time especially in opinions. We have an entire sports industry that is global and it brings nations massive amounts of revenue. They clearly don't think its a waste of time. Video games are not a waste of time and that industry is huge. Most people say tennis is a waste of time because they see it as boring. For all the people that actually enjoy it we think its awesome. How can sports be a waste of time if they do much good?
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

But we know that's impossible so why would that even have anything to do with this debate?It's an analogy. A kid wanting to be something that doesn't exist and can't affect the way anything works in our society, is virtually the same as a kid aspiring to be something he is less likely to be that also doesn't affect our society.Also I don't see a test of strength as a waste of timeI don't see how it isn't. It doesn't add anything to our civilization.anything can be called a waste of time especially in opinions.True, I call anything a waste of time something that doesn't actively help, aid, or benefit society as a whole, and I consider neutral, things that don't help but don't hinder, to be a waste of said time.We have an entire sports industry that is global and it brings nations massive amounts of revenue.That is true, but just as it brings money in, so does other things that people don't have to spend money on. If a depression hits spending money on watching sports is one of the 1st things people will stop doing, defeating the benefit of sports and that industry. They clearly don't think its a waste of time.Well we have decided on differing opinions. Video games are not a waste of time and that industry is huge.I'd argue that they too are. They act as an outlet but other things that are more constructive can also. Like wood work, which while keeping the kid busy so he's not joining gangs also teaches him real world skills he can use constructively later on. Most people say tennis is a waste of time because they see it as boring.I don't let my bias of interest get in the way, or I try to keep it to a minimum. Although i do consider watching any sport to be boring(I'd much rather play) I always leave that out as an argument because I think about usefulness as the nation as a whole not just myself. Plus it'd leave too wide of a hole. I say it's boring to watch, someone disputes saying it's not. Then we just go back and forth all day long.How can sports be a waste of time if they do much good?What good they do that can't be replaced by something more constructive. The only benefit, off the top of my head, I give sports is that it helps people o lose weight, but even I can defeat that one by saying how doing simple exercise can do that also. it may be more boring but it's more to the point of losing wight.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

The way your putting things won't work though. If all we teach our kids are skills for the future then aren't we control their fates? Also most jobs are being replaced by technology so what will you teach a child? Also their won't be jobs available for everybody. If a depression hits other countries continue their sports. Sports does many good things. Majorly it provides revenue for a given area which is very essential for civilization. Sports also is a way to test your body. Most people want to feel dominant so they take up sports. They can be fast and play track or be very strong and play football. Since sports have been around for ages they practically fit in society like a key hole. I do not know a place that doesn't play sports besides, probably, North Korea.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

If all we teach our kids are skills for the future then aren't we control their fates?We aren't teaching them the things we know exactly, we are just eliminating the things that don't give as much as they could.Also most jobs are being replaced by technology so what will you teach a child?I won't teach the child I'll let the child be taught like I was by doing and by the schools' system. And at the point where all human jobs are replaced by machines It'd then be a waste of time to learn anything. I'd still hold firm to that idea.If a depression hits other countries continue their sports.Yes, that may be true. I could give a more drastic example where it's the global economy, or I could keep it simple and say that when the economy of our country crashes and people are no longer spending money on entertainment, that the working of other economies won't be too much of a bother to ours.Majorly it provides revenue for a given area which is very essential for civilization.As with the above argument, when people don't have money at their leisure they're less likely to spend what they do have on sports.Sports also is a way to test your bodyThat doesn't sound like a logical reason as to why sports are not just a waste of public time.. Most people want to feel dominant so they take up sports. People feeling dominant is also just a waste of public time that doesn't add a constructive purpose to anything. Or at least it doesn't add a constructive purpose to anything involving sports, which I have also found to be nonconstructive.They can be fast and play track or be very strong and play football.Also not logical additives to the public.Since sports have been around for ages they practically fit in society like a key hole.They fit into the society like crime does. Crime is inevitable, no matter how well off people are doing, and I don't think you'd say crime isn't a waste of time.I do not know a place that doesn't play sports besides, probably, North Korea.And they are still surviving. Albeit not well, but that's because their leader surpresses them not because they can't play sports.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

This comes down to opinion. Testing your body is just recreation an element of natural selection. Its shows us how our adaptions can help us.Im sure when Americas economy was low in 2008 that sports were just cancelled. Of course not. People still spend their money to go see it. The probability of us falling into a major depression like that is low. Crime isn't always a waste of time either depending on the criteria of the crime. People with no money want something to do. Usually a basketball court is near and they play. Eliminating sports from society is just odd. We don't want to take that away from people because it doesn't advance us. Lots of things dont advance us as you say but they are a leisure additives.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

i THINK SPORTS AARE THE BEST THNG IN THE WORLD THEY DO US GREAT THINGS AN I MEAN GREAT THINGS IN THE WORLD
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

ITS THE THING THAT THE WORLD IS KEEPING EVERYONE FROM GETTING FAT AND THAT THEY SHOULD DO THINGS AN AT LEAST TRY IF THEY DONT LIKE IT THEN DONT DO THEM BUT THINK ABOUT OTHER THINGS INSTEAD OF YOURSELF
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

SPORTS ARE LIKE REALLY FAST MOVEMENTS AND EVERYTHING THEY ARE AFUNN TRY THEM SOME TIME YOU MITE LIKE NOT SAYING TO DO IT BUT JUST TRY THEN YOU MITE SWITCH YOUR ANSWER YOU NEVER NO UNLESS YOU TRY
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Indeed, it rather controversial issue, nevertheless I hold on the position that going in for sports just waste of time. Apparently, sports is essential part of our life and to keep human's body in good condition peoplle should be engaged in it. BUT! Actually, that's a problem! Because, as you know, nowadays some persons used to think that sports is a main part in their life and without it life wouldn't be so fruitful and etc. So, in fact, our modern world develops day out day, improving other kinds of technologies, equipments, affairs in almost all spheres of activities and because of this one I suppose the an education plays more relevant role than sports, I mean people should pay attention to it more closely in comparison with sports
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Although I can understand why overs can enjoy it to me all it is running about aimlessly after a small object.You can easily get better exercise without actually doing competitive sport and it also sport is more likely to result in an injury than simply going to the gym or for a run.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

I don't mean only student or pupil, I talk about people at whole; surely, I cannot disagree with you, because sitting at home the whole day certainly harmful one, but instead of sports activity, you can change it by a lot of other affairs. Actually, sports-is a sphere, where people can be seriously damaged, getting significant injuries
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

aurad, That's a problem! Traumas and injuries are essential part of sport activities. Thus, I'm against it;) Alright, just could u imagine? If a sportsman get kind of trauma, who take care? I think nobody. That's a point, because the consequences of getting injury might be too terrifying, you must not be a genius to realize that person can become a disable because of trauma, we have too many examples, confirming this one. So, I suppose my position is proved in that case.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

aurad, you are right, but a possibility of getting serious trauma is enormously increasing, while going in for sports.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Sports is just for fun it is never a serious game infact it is just a game played for earning money. But according to me people those who waste their money in such types of games are stupids because they take these games very seriously.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

In my opinion, Sports is a waste of time because I just don't care for Sports.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Absolutely not. Sports provide many mental, emotional, physical and social benefits. More physically active people are more mentally and physically healthy. Daily physical activity has been proven to positively alter brain chemistry, and as a mental patient, I know the value of physical, and mental, activity.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Manual labor can provide mental, emotional, physical and social benefits and be productive. If people spent less time playing and more time working they would improve themselves and the world around them.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Correct. :)
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Except, manual labor does not offer an opponent. Who the hell would want to live in a world where you cannot prove your superiority, anyway?
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Manual labor does offer an opponent, it is all those that do the same job. Prove your superiority by being better than everyone else at your job.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

You cant find an opponent if you were never in a competition. You cant have a competition without enjoymentIts cant be called "job" if you enjoy itLogic ;)Debates are the sports reasoning. If Athletes are wasting their time, then so do we.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

The competition is work.Some people enjoy their job.Yes, we are wasting our time.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

"Find a job you will enjoy and never again will you work"-ConfuciousMen who loves their job never considers themselves working. And competition is another form of "sport" as it has its winners and losers. In fact, anything that can be challenged falls under the same category! Even the most ridiculous reasons
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

I love my job and don't consider it work, but I am still working. Confucious must have been a little confused.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

No, its the English language which is at fault. Some countries can have different definitions for job,work and responsibility.Either way, job is defined as being ordered around by money, to make money. Which is a miserable reason.If your motivation is to feed your passion, then you are not working at all.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Sports is an art. An art where you hone both physical, mental, and social skills to beat your opponent. No art can ever be a waste of time.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: Yes

Yeah spending your life by throwing spear or rock same way all the time, or running straight or jumping over a stick... art, yes..
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

The definition of art varies among people and culture, my friend.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Sports spawned only because of high productivity, it wasn't magic. Sports is an unique part of life that offers many unique challenges to all levels of competitors.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

no because sport is refresh of your mind when you feel bad in any thing especially in work and school when you go and get some sport than you will refresh mind and easy to solve any problem that was hard with you ,, And also it physical is also good and so that we need sport it is not waste of time ,,,,
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

No, they give you excerise and help you socialise. But you can't devote your life to sports. They are not a waste of time but i don't care for them.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Here's what i gotta say: Wanna be a fat-ass? Dont do sports!
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

yes. i think sports a take much time. but it good for you.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Absolutely not. Where else can you find drug misuse, gambling, bribery, all brought to you by popular demand.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

I think, that sport is not waste of time, because its a part of life. People go in for sport to be health, some people are sportsmen and they see their future in this sphere
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

In my point of view pupil or student, i dont know who you mean, should combine studying and sport, because its hjarmful for person to sit at home the whole day and learn.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Hell no, sports are hardly a waste of time; they help develop coordination skills, competitive skills, manual labor skills (when getting paid to do them. I.E coaching, athletic directors, medical staff, ect), and overall provide the individual to provide themselves with courage, happiness, joy, pain, whilst working on a team (cooperation). For those whom believe otherwise probably have never played sports in their lives, and/or are non-athletic. "Sports" is an art form; the creative aspects are obviously, in that all sports have a strategy involved, herego, the "artistic values" come into play, just as a painter is a strategist when figuring out what they want to do and how they want to do it.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Of course, I agree with you. People can be damaged, but injury is a part of sport. Its impossible running, jumping, boxing etc. without traumas.
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Dear Smurfik, but we have examples of people who didn't go in for sport and because of it they're ill now. It's life, everything can happen and you want to say, that we should stay at home and afraid of injures which can happen with us?
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

sports are not a waste of time .. they help us to be fit and when we play we forget all our past and future and stay happy in the present..
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

they keep us fit and healthy .. and who doesn't like to play?? sports is a good way to keep you fresh :)
Debate: Are sports a waste of time?
Side: No

Of course no because it help our bodies and it's very funny