azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

It is interesting that a weird pseudo-scientist published his discovery in particle physics in a religious papers that do not have a peer board in physics, mathematics, engineering or astronomy. Who by they own description deals exclusively with religion traditions, rituals and sociology...Have you ever seen for example that latest discovery in field molecular biology being published in Arts Journal? Or Economical model in Chemistry journal?... I did not.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Indeed. It is shocking how a guy with fig leaves can prove something that people with computers cant.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

the point is that you cannot, It is like me saying that I have fart out solution for stabilizing quantum computers and I will publish it in some local Mosque.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

He just did. LOL
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

yet apart from few religious weirdos ..nothing, nobody gives a shit about his bullshit paper.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Bullshit papers? HAHAHA!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I tld you that he is a bug scientist that publishes about bugs (and magic :D)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

"He is one of 5% of U.S. Scientists in the Who's Who of Technology today. He retired from the USDA on June 20, 1986, and is now on the staff of the Olive W. Garvey Center for the improvement of Human Functioning, Inc., Wichita, Kansas as an infrared systems and low energy consultant."Ironic isnt it? Those who has a degree in physics were astounded by the fact that a mere bug scientist can overwhelm their discoveries. He is doing a better job in replacing them.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Ironic isnt it? Those who has a degree in physics were astounded by the fact that a mere bug scientist can overwhelm their discoveries. He is doing a better job in replacing them.Who with degree in physics was astounded by which discovery? ...are we talking about magical rocks, ants or tachyons in vegetables?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Tachyons
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

...maybe a weird bug guy who wrote books on magic, esoteric, healing rocks and does physical experiments on ficus leafs ...is not much a scientist. More like a shaman or wizard and that is the area of expertise of those two Religion Journals, am I right :DI have printed his "paper" on Tachyons :D a brought it to my favourite bar to "weekly" meeting of my group, we really had a good laugh.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

No. He placed every scientists in shame after using merely garbage to discover things that those with a degree cannot. He published his works and got respected as one of the brilliant minds in the the scientific community.Then he tested the Guadalupe and confirmed that it is beyond scientific explanation
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Nice delusion you live in. He is an idiot, fuctard with ficus. He discredited himself, by trying to publish an obvious bullshit. He wrote book on magic, how scientific is that? :DIt is interesting that "magic picture" has been tested by just an only "scientist" from unrelated scientific disciplines with really funny backgroundand I'm not even talking about those who does not even exist :Dso where is his paper published apart of religious journals ?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Calling a person who made major contributions in science as an idiot? now thats priceless. HAHAHAHA!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

If he would made major contribution to science, he wouldn't be publishing it in religious papers... sorry but epic fail.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Oh GOD my sides are in heaven. hahahaha!He never published any religious articles. Rather, he wrote physic books that supported the existence of the paranormal.I spilled my coffee from pure hilarity, thanks alot! :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

with your logic is Harry Potter real because he is in a book ...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

With your logic, evolution isnt real because the only degree that Charles Darwin had is a bachelor in Arts, in Christ college..Must be quite the stress for you to keep humiliating yourself for days, isnt it? How long do you plan to live?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

BA is in common on old UK colleges to be given for any kind of degree. I have BA in Mathematics. In Darwin times were scientific disciplines much less separated. Originally he was on best UK medical school where he joined natural history group. later he was forced by his father to became a Pastor. After that he tried to get into the Tripos but as Pastor he did not qualified so he went for degree in Natural Theology. SO he had all the possible education in biology that was available... All you arguments are from ignorance, very easy to break.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

But in the end he never had any official degree in biology. All that Charles Darwin had was an experience in gardening and traveling. In fact, Charles considers himself more of a theologist than a scientist. Similarly, Dr. Callahan used his knowledge in insects and experience in biology to enhance his knowledge in the art of infrared technology and microwaves to become one of the first scientists to discover Tachyon's.Using merely house hold tools, he became responsible for 106 scientific papers and 12 books all has greatly contributed in the scientific world. He is considered as one of the most under appreciated thinkers in the world.And despite his wisdom, he failed to explain the Guadalupe.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

please link some of his surely plenty articles in one of these http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=3100
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

You do realize that that link records only the journals that were published in the last 3 years, right?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

That is just list of journals, I have prepaid some of them. you can do search back for many years.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

No search by authorNo search by categoryNo journal more than 5 years old.How foolish can you possibly be?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

That site is only RANKING those journals, to search IN those journals you have to buy them, or buy access. I have used that as a list asking you if he ever published in any of them ever.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

You must be really desperate, using link to a webpage about ants as a proof that bug scientist found Tachyon by measuring vegetables :D :D :D btw here is your NASA Guadalupe, it is a rock on MARShttp://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image feature138.html
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Apparently, you do not even realize that it was your own sources that I use against you.P.SYou skipped the other scientists, what a surprise
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

What other scientist? What source you used against me ?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Too dumb to understand I see. Dont worry, you have my sympathy.Just go back to YouTube or some sites that welcome fools like you.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

You have failed to present a single reference to NASA webpage with article about your picture. You have repeatedly send just simple Google result with no link to NASA page.You are religious zealot incapable of independent thinking. Reading same psedo-science, articles done by religious weirdo like you but now you hit someone who knows how to verified credibility of articles.Game Over.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Simple answer: Because NASA is too afraid of admitting their discoveries to the public.The answer is that simple but you lean to the concept of denials and self-delusions. Practically makes you no different from religious freaks.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Bullshit you cannot prove .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Correction: it is an obvious fact that you kept on denying.Its practically just one click away in google but you stuck here with an endless pile of excuses that will amuse no one
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

send direct link to reputable source .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

I sent you Wikipedia and I dared you to prove that its references are wrong. You never replied. hmm.....Im so bored with you. Cant you try harder?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Just from the name of referees I could see that they are mostly religious institutions or very general stuff.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Daily InquirerJournal of the American Academy of Religion.The Journal for the Scientific Study of ReligionIm so sick of you already. Cant you at least speak something intelligent?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Religious institutions, reviewing miracles, sorry but no :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

You actually think that the Journal of the American Academy of Religion and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion are religious institutions?I cant believe I underestimated how dumb you can be
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Daily Inquirer is a newspaper.those two journal are religious journals, they even have it in their names.How long I have to wait for a recognized non religious review?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

And here is where you completely proved your ignorance. Just for the sake of memories, I took a screencap LOLDo the world a favor and kill yourself.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofReligionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JournalfortheScientificStudyofReligion
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

DO I really want so much, a single one link to a physics journal? Not a newspaper, not a religious paper, not a gardening paper Physics paper in Physics journal.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

JAAR and JSSR are peer-reviewed academic papers who devoted themselves to the study of every single religion in the world. They are ranked as one of the most respected papers ever published.It is exactly what you are looking for. And guess what?Science has indeed abandoned you.Come on faggot, it will only take 6 pills of Aleve to get rid of yourself from the genepool
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Why does Physicist publish in Papers that are about religions? :D How are they qualified in particle Physics? Please show me where those two JSSR and JAAR got in their description "we review particle physics". I only found that they do Religions and sociology... :D That's really a joke :D :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

JSSR and JAAR are papers done by professors and approved by scientists and researchers alike. And since you no longer have any excuse then it means only one thing/thread
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I sorry but since when are discoveries in Physics published exclusively in journals about religions?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Since the first time scientific journals began to be circulated among academies
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Since the first time scientific journals began to be circulated among academies ...in their respective fields. I do maths and physics, I will not publish in South African history quarterly or in Neuron... simply because those people are not experts in my field to test my hypothesis... Scientific Journals are not newspapers.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Nice personal opinions, you should update your blog! :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

it is not my personal opinion, that how it is you little dumb cow. Do you think that it is common publish scientific discoveries just and only in religious papers?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Of course it is common publish scientific discoveries just and only in religious papers, idiot!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

No it is not, same why you have no papers about poetry in journal about Pharma.Only way why would your paper be published in religious paper would be because it does fits the description. Especially when the paper is about Healing power of Tahyons :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Simple answer: Because it is unrelated.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

so magic => religious papers .Physics => physics paperhe published in Religious paper therefore he did magic ....
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

He never did. He published scientific books and articles that supported the existence of the paranormal. That is all
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

He never did. He published scientific books and articles that supported the existence of the paranormal. That is allThat is literally the best way to losing credit as a scientist .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Except he wasn't. The scientific world cannot disprove his claims that the Guadalupe is for real so all they can do now is to ignore and deny. Just as what you are doing right now.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

again, science is not realm of religion and magic. HE has to prove that HE is right. Nobody is obligated of disproving anything. HE has to prove that HE is 100% his experiment must be redone board of peers and multiple universities... He done none of it.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

He has done his job of 100% evidence that the Guadalupe is beyond explanation. He has done countless experiments and redone by peers and scientific agencies, even NASA themselves was involved. It has been 30 years since scientists first examined the Tilma and no one was able to prove their evidences wrong, which means only one thing:Denial can only get you so far
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

...and bullshits are back. Bug scientist, closely related to magic, healing rocks, etc. As far as I remember you haven't provided anything relevant that would by any way linked NASA to that picture.What evidence are you talking about?Bug freak with ficus?Guy employed by company that owns the picture?Fake NASA scientist?Nobel prize winner that examined the "evidence" 20 years after his death?is this how you imagine solid science?I see just another religious hoax made up for profit...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Indeed.>Dr Callahan is not a bug scientist but a biophysicist who proved his ridiculous claims>If NASA was never involved in the study, the Guadalupe books would be confiscated for the crimes of Defamation>He was employed AFTER he failed>Its just takes one search in Google to know everything>How you say that its made for profit when they ask for no charge in entering the church and seeing the painting?Just stop your denials, already. You know that you have already failed. Do you want me to start laughing again?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Dr Callahan is not a bug scientist but a biophysicist who proved his ridiculous claimsBy qualification he is entomologist (exact meaning: bug dissector) most of his papers are about ants.If NASA was never involved in the study, the Guadalupe books would be confiscated for the crimes of DefamationNo it would not. It is very common for religious hoaxers to use word NASA hoping that people like you wouldn't dig around. Just try YouTube for NASA proves science in Quran, Bible etc... they wouldn't be doing anything else... Gaugalupe owners/hoaxers are in Mexico...>He was employed AFTER he failedclaimed by guy paid for saying so...>How you say that its made for profit when they ask for no charge in entering the church and seeing the painting?Religious drones gives money to anything that is shiny or magical, tax free money... more bullshit they make, more magical it will look like, equals more donations...Have you ever wondered why they never ever gave a smallest sample to recognized labs like those in MIT, Oxford, Caltech, ESA ?Because it would end up like Shroud of Turin, labs would publish that it is a hoax...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

By qualification he is entomologistHe graduated as a biophysicist and has been renowned in his craft. Doesnt mean that your passion are insects doesnt mean that you are useless in other fields.It is very common for religious hoaxers to use word NASAIf you are referring to ordinary hoaxes on the internet, then I agree. But it is a different matter if it was published for public use. All books are carefully analyzed by every state and every wrong information has its punishments. From being sued to removal of license, it all counts.If they are lying, the Guadalupe books would be confiscatedclaimed by guy paid for saying so...Ive been asking you for evidences that he was being bribed. You always skip this question. Gee, I wonder why.Religious drones gives money to anything that is shiny or magicalYou consider donations as profit? Seriously?Have you ever wondered why they never ever gave a smallest sample to recognized labs like those in MIT, Oxford, Caltech, ESA ?What are you talking about? The research has been analyzed and approved by Oxford and Harvard. Published in scientific and religious journals and carefully studied in many universities and scientific academies. sighThis is pathetic. You know that you already lost. Its time to stop posting and go back to YouTube
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

All books are carefully analyzed by every state and every wrong information has its punishments. From being sued to removal of license, it all counts. Pure 100% bullshit. Ive been asking you for evidences that he was being bribed. You always skip this question. Gee, I wonder why.José Aste Tonsmann, a Cornell University graduate of environmental systems engineering, who is now with the Mexican Center of Guadalupan Studies.... independent as fuck :DWhat are you talking about? The research has been analyzed and approved by Oxford and HarvardI would like to see lab reports, like the one for Turin ...direct link please :He graduated as a biophysicist and has been renowned in his craft. Doesnt mean that your passion are insects doesnt mean that you are useless in other fieldsPhilip S. Callahanfull list of his life workhttp://dykstralabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/CALLAHAN.PUB_.pdf All about corn worms moths, ants... sorry :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Pure 100% bullshit.Your denials amuse meJosé Aste Tonsmann, a Cornell University graduate of environmental systems So, where is the proof that he was bribed?I would like to see lab reports, like the one for Turin ...direct link pleasesighAll about corn worms moths, antsYou skipped his works on Tachyons? How adorable.http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1320&dat=19840309&id=wzxWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=nukDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2932,2676692 I might start humiliating you again later. Goodluck trying to remain active on this site.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

"Pure 100% bullshit.Your denials amuse me"Why so? Please link me the global censorship institution that rules over all books on the planet and decides what can be published and what cannot... :DSo, where is the proof that he was bribed?He works for the picture owner a.k.a he is paid by the picture owner.Wikipedia is not a lab report nor it links to any.I did not skipped any...We are in circle. I am asking evidence. you are not offering any. over and over again.btw your link does not worksHIS WORK ON "TAHYONS" is alchemy/magic. Which is exactly why it was never ever published in a single physics journal. Not even one. So "awesome" discovery done just with vegetables ... and the only people who talks about that are Religious journals and friends from Ant society.You are delusional religious zealot, refusing to live in reality. hiding behind bullshit and hoaxes.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Whats the matter? Too dumb to use the bold function on all arguments?Why so? Please link me the global censorship institution that rules over all books on the planet and decides what can be published and what cannotEasyHe works for the picture owner a.k.a he is paid by the picture owner.Salaries does not equates to bribery. And he became a worker after he failedWikipedia is not a lab report nor it links to any.Im so impressed. Never expected another original excuse.HIS WORK ON "TAHYONS" is alchemy/magic. Which is exactly why it was never ever published in a single physics journal.Stop making a fool of yourself. If you want to make me laugh, dont try too hard.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

THERE IS NOBODY WHO CHECKS BOOKS TO BE CORRECT !!! How wold you expect to be "God's Delusion" legally sold??? If is it right why could be any religious books legally sold?... meh?""Salaries does not equates to bribery. And he became a worker after he failed""Ever heard about paid promotion? Having salary for promoting product kind of disqualifies you from being "independent" opinion... especially in area you have no educational background or experience...""Im so impressed. Never expected another original excuse.""As I said Wikipedia is free to edit database. If I want to add that Guadalupe was brought to Earth by Aliens. I can...Stop making a fool of yourself. If you want to make me laugh, dont try too hard.NO SINGLE PAPER IN PHYSICS JORNALNO REPETITION OF EXPERIMENT DONE BY ANYBODY TO CONFIRM ITA.K.A it did not happen...It is exactly same as me saying that I can fly and it is true because I just wrote it to you. I'm not going to show it to you. You just must believe me.Sorry but this is how religions works not science. In Science prove it or just fuck off.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Who would have thought, you were still alive. And look, seems like you have made a good entrance.THERE IS NOBODY WHO CHECKS BOOKS TO BE CORRECT !!!Yes there is.Ever heard about paid promotion?So where is your evidence that he is paid to lie?As I said Wikipedia is free to edit database.LOLYeah sure, and did you check the references yet?NO SINGLE PAPER IN PHYSICS JORNALhttp://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1320&dat=19840309&id=wzxWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=nukDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2932,2676692 Your capitalization sure makes your argument better. hahaha!