Debate: Get this over with...why do you believe/disbelieve in God?
Side: I believe because.....

"Strangely, it's only you that seems to think this."I'm sure there are plenty of people who believe that in a debate it is best to post a detailed argument with reason without going overboard and having to list every reason in existence. ..This is obvious. "And you're wanting incomplete arguments, sorry, not going to happen."What! lol Your definition of an incomplete argument is an argument that doesn't consist of "all reasons". This is getting weird. All I'm wanting (and keep in mind I'm not telling anyone what to do) is a detailed argument with reason. "I'm not."According to everything you've been saying you are. "Is this why you jumped on my argument, because it made you feel insignificant?"No. I told you why. You wish. "Calling me low for wanting to end this farce and get back to the debate, is a bit much, no?If you can't provide a reason, fair enough."But that's not why I called you low.... Nice try though. "Are you stating that I would win if we were debating God?"Great question. You'd have to define win. But in my post on the other side (that you haven't disputed yet) I state very clearly that it isn't a good topic of debate. And I gave pretty good reason too. BUT- if you want to discuss that lets do it elsewhere I don't want you changing the subject. (; "I hope the irony in this is not lost on you." I know it's so hard for you. But could you explain that for me? It's a lot of work I know. "All three of them are one sentence long each, riveting stuff really."LOL ok I'll give you that one. (; "But, why should I?"Because that's whatchya do in a debate. "What the hell is a false word?"That's when you say "your saying this" When I'm really not. Like when you were saying that I was saying you weren't allowed to post a one sentence argument. "Work away."That's what I thought. "As wielded by you, not by how I read it."It seemed pretty straight forward to me. How did you see it exactly? "Indeed, because the Christian God is a good starting point, one where the ideas presented by this specific dogma can be challenged."yeah... So you say you have no reason to challenge them ..right? Then why not explain just a little bit about why you see no reason to challenge them. Instead of 'just because'. "I was highlighting it, in order to hopefully communicate to you the enormity of an argument on this."If you write a paper and the teacher wants it to be no shorter or longer than a page then I don't know what you would do. Because the topic is just so broad! How can you get it all on one page right... Do you see what I'm saying?  "What you're saying is you've no reason to believe, you just do, is it?"Nope. False words again."You my friend are Atheist to almost every God, I just go one God further, can you explain to me why you don't believe in Zeus or Thor or any other God? Probably not, you just don't, right? Well I feel like all these Gods need including."You're trying to change the subject. But I will answer non the less. Of course those other Gods need including. The reason I don't believe in those other gods is because I find truth through the holy spirit (from God) and basically that is the answer that I got. But we differ greatly on the subject of finding truth so it would be invalid to go down this road. "You display the Christian "Yahwahocentrism" , because you believe in the God of the Bible, that he is the only one worth debating."So you know what I believe now. What did you do to achieve that truth? Are you sure that's what I believe because I do not.(I believe in the god of the bible it's the 2nd part of the sentence I'm talking about) What makes you think I think other gods aren't worth debating? I consider myself a very reasonable and open minded person. And it's shocking to me that somebody who relies so much on science is willing to assume so much of the beliefs and opinions of others. Psychology is a science if you studied it (as I do) then you would realize how biased and closed minded you sound. You are not a critical thinker.