Debate: We should accept the LGBTQ community - I mean - what's the worse that could happen?
Side: Sure, why not?

the real truth dwells within youI know it's impossible for a Christian to believe someone might not actually believe your nonsense, but I simply don't. It's time you accept that the majority of the world (since the majority is not Christian) are not closet Christians.Who did God rape?Arguably Mary, but my point wasn't so much the God raped, but that he condoned it. In Deuteronomy God even gives clear permission to keep the women of the cities they fight. It also instructs if a man is caught raping a woman he simply needs to pay the father and marry the woman.Which man's action became law?You stated every action of God's becomes law, not man. Get your story straightHere means CD.comOkay, where can it be presented?What nonsense? Spaghetti monster?It's just as much nonsense as your godcompared to a man there is material evidence for his existence?There is material evidence for the existence of many men, what you cannot do is prove why this one is any different.Did you ever legally own a bible?Have you ever actually read the Bible?Probably wasn't legal, you had to skim through quickly before you got caught....so missed certain vital points...i don't blame you being atheist.....A red herring. I've made it known in many debates on this site I was a proud Christian for over 30 years, and I still own many Bibles. You did however, fail to address my statement.Now you doubt science too?How do those three words indicate I doubt science?If he didn't his bones would have been easily discovered and recoverd like peter's as he was the main Icon.Of the 107 billion people that ever lived, only 7 billion are alive today. We don't have the bones of all 100 billion dead people so why is it surprising we don't have his. Also, how would you determine with absolute certainty they even were his if you found them?If you insist otherwise, you therefore pressume jesus never died(from brutal beatings) and probably fled, went missing.Even if he did flee he still would have eventually died, so this is a pointless argumentYeah right, He woke up oneday, complained he had a nightmare and for that reason he kicked them out.This sentence doesn't make any sense, but kicking someone out is entirely different from abandonment. It was a scenario backing up a point, if point gets destroyed, scenario invalid.You never even addressed the point, much less "destroyed" it.Understanding is not a certificate(PHD) for HimI don't even understand what you said.He just is.Another baseless statement.Invalid.Again, you have to actually address a statement to make the claim. Unfortunately for you there is plenty of archeological evidence supporting human life long before the timeframe of Adam and Eve.Simple doesn't mean zero process.Why? The creation account suggests God merely spoke the universe into existence, why must there be a process to simply remove a contamination?Plus He asks for permission first. A real gentleman.Let's say I was at a restaurant and my server brought over my drink. Unknown to me, my drink had been poisoned, but a man across the room had watched it happen, however decided not to tell me. Are you suggesting the witness was a gentleman because I didn't first ask him if it was poisoned?