azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

The fact that a deaf person cannot hear means they are less capable than other people in one aspect. That necessarily means that they can't be treated as "the same" as other people.If a deaf person applies to be a telemarketer or a music reviewer, they will and should be rejected for the sole reason that they are deaf. If someone wants to talk to a deaf person, they will need to face them so their lips can be read, or speak clearly and loudly so they can be heard with hearing aids, or use sign language, for the sole reason that that person is deaf.So by definition, all things being equal, a deaf person should not and cannot be treated as being equal to a person who isn't deaf.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

Nope, I disagree. Deaf people can be treated as the same as everyone else in the hearing world. We live in a high tech era where we communicate using technology such as text messaging, email, Facebook, etc. Get a clue!!! Telemarketers are the lowest forms of individuals anyway, who would want to waste time with them? Most Deaf people wouldn't want to be telemarketers, because that is the lowest jobs in the planet. We, as Deaf people, have too much pride to stoop that low.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

Nope, I disagree. Deaf people can be treated as the same as everyone else in the hearing world.If a deaf person is treated the same with no assistance, they become liable to be injured in fast-moving areas with machinery, and are unable to follow much of our culture. It is only because, out of kindness and compassion, that we treat them special and that they can use subtitles, text, and other visual cues.We live in a high tech era where we communicate using technology such as text messaging, email, Facebook, etc. Get a clue!!!Life is not the internet.Telemarketers are the lowest forms of individuals anyway, who would want to waste time with them?You dodged the statement.Most Deaf people wouldn't want to be telemarketers, because that is the lowest jobs in the planet. It does not matter what you want. It matters what you CAN do. You cannot be a telemarketer.We, as Deaf people, have too much pride to stoop that low. You loserville!Pride is useless when you are denying your condition. You cannot sing. You cannot hear music. You cannot understand spoken language except as visual cues. You cannot hear the various sounds of the natural world, like those which signify danger.Your sense of pride is similar to a blind person expecting to be treated equally to a sighted individual. While sound is not as complex as visual imagery, it is just as important in the world, and you cannot perceive it. You should be fighting to make deaf people able to hear it.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

Okay, what a minute. Who says I can't hear, sing, understand spoken language, various sounds of the natural world (that signify danger)? I CAN and DO hear those things constantly, FYI. Don't assume I can't perceive sound. In Bend, Oregon, I was a telemarketer for 3 years. I did just fine in communicating face to face and on the cellphone, and I'm not denying my condition. You love to argue, and keep arguing for the sake of arguing.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

Okay, what a minute. Who says I can't hear, sing, understand spoken language, various sounds of the natural world (that signify danger)?Deafness signifies the inability to sense sound. These activities all require the ability to sense sound, and on varying levels to perceive it. Unless you have implants, you cannot sense sound, which precludes your ability to engage in these activities.I CAN and DO hear those things constantly, FYI. Don't assume I can't perceive sound.You have implants. Without them, you can only feel vibration.In Bend, Oregon, I was a telemarketer for 3 years. I did just fine in communicating face to face and on the cellphone, and I'm not denying my condition.With implants, computer software assistance, or lip reading. Except for implants, none of these things offer equivalence to hearing, they merely work around the limitation.You love to argue, and keep arguing for the sake of arguing.As apparently you do.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

Exactly - deaf people need to "communicate using technology such as text messaging, email, Facebook, etc". For me to interact with a deaf person as though they were a hearing person would lead to ridiculous situations.Note that I'm not saying deaf people should be treated as inferior people or that they should have fewer rights than hearing people. Rather, their condition needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, and that requires people not to think of deaf people as being the same as hearing people.And I'm not sure how saying "You loserville!" contributes to the debate on deaf people, or to anything other than the growing impression that you cannot form a coherent counter-argument and must resort to insults. If you're trying to troll, you need to do better than that :P
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

I appologize for saying "you loserville", my husband typed that in when I wasn't looking. I'm not trying to be insultuous. When I did telemarketing in Bend, Oregon for 3 years, I had a deaf friend with me. We asked questions face to face and on the telephone. It was no problem! The people we've contacted were understanding and would speak up for us. It riles me up when people are so assumptive.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: Yes

It's true that with the wonders of modern medicine, deafness isn't an absolute condition. When I said "deaf", what I meant was people who simply cannot hear or have great difficulty hearing - not people who are biologically deaf but have adaptive technology allowing them to hear.People who really can't hear are the ones whom I say can't be treated as "the same", because you clearly need to take their inability to hear into consideration whenever you interact with them.If someone can hear as well or almost as well as a hearing person, then that's great, and you wouldn't need to worry about anything.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

Were you aware Deaf people are doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, vets, architects, radio talk show hosts, college professors, principals, teachers, business owners, web designers, CEO's, and a whole list of anything else you can think of? Deafness is not a limitation to what a person can become. Deaf people really can do anything except hear. And that does not hold them back. Especially now with all the new technoligies and ways of accessing information. Deaf Power!
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

I am completely deaf since I was born and always wear hearing aids on both of my ears, BUT because of hard work or practice I have been doing at how to speak orally and pick right-balance volume of my own voice without sign language at all since I was small until now may will make you open your mind a little bit more about this debate and whatever topic debate about deaf people. And oh actually the cochlear implants is not cool idea to do because it brings a risk for life.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

I am completely deaf since I was born and always wear hearing aids on both of my ears, BUT because of hard work or practice I have been doing at how to speak orally and pick right-balance volume of my own voice without sign language at all since I was small until now may will make you open your mind a little bit more about this debate and whatever topic debate about deaf people.If you were treated equally to a hearing person, there would be no subtitles in movies, no sign language or assistance to those who cannot hear. The reason we provide these services is that the deaf cannot function well without them.And oh actually the cochlear implants is not cool idea to do because it brings a risk for life.I do not understand this statement.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

"If [deaf people] were treated equally to a hearing person, there would be no subtitles in movies, no sign language or assistance to those who cannot hear. The reason we provide these services is that the deaf cannot function well without them". You are definitely correct in this statement. Deafness is a disability; most deaf people I have met - who are logical and well-educated - do agree so. There is nothing wrong with being disabled. We all are disabled, one way or another, physically, mentally or even spiritually. But it is illogical for some deaf people to hold on to an illusion that they are not disabled and refuse accommodation. Their inappropriate pride can be detrimental to their own functioning.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

i take asl and i think that deaf people should be treated equal because yeah they may need extra attention but that dosent mean you treat them like junk i have a deaf aunt
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

obviously not. THEY CANT HEAR AS GOOD AS ADRIAN ROMERO. FOLLOW HIM @ADRIANISBLACK ON TWITTER EXCEPT ITS NOT IN CAPS OKAY YDG?
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

No, simply because they cannot hear you :D
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

No. They should get slightly better treatment .
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

I am losing my hearing as we speak, I have been for the last few years. 100 % loss in the right and over 65% in my left and I am hearing aid assisted in my left???and I am 49 years old so I have experience on both sides.. And is my take on the subject. ..As a person with a hearing disability it is a hidden disability if I stood in line with you you wouldn't unless you attempted to converse with me, we might struggle to find our communication style but it can be done. There are laws and finances set aside to aid our ability to coexist with the hearing. Because we have a disability. I have no problem with the label disabled because I am a machine made by god that has May working parts if I have a defective part I cannot run as smooth as I was made to be therefore I am disabled.now as for treatment by other able body people are just plain rude selfish inconsiderate to those with the hearing disability.... I hate it when you tell me I have to pay attention .... Or "you are not going to repeat your self that would giving me special treatment."( really?!?!?! ) ... Would you tell a person in a wheelchair come on push that chair harder or tell a blind person once you gone this that you cannot you the cane again....but you will tell me to listen harder (for real I have been told this by educated teachers I am going to school to learn sign language) or "all you need is your brain to make you ears work right I say yes you have a brain again I say yes they then say then use your brain you can hear if you want to.". They wouldn't tell a amputee to think legs and you will be legs. If I didn't hear or understand something I will ask for a repeat this could save my life or inform me of a change in travel plans. Or harmful weather is coming and you need to get to safety... Oh and while on the subject I am losing my hearing UNTIL then do not put in a a world of no sounds or expect me to be utterly silent I want to hear everything I can before I am unable to so please talk to me, don't shut me out I still want to have human connections so to get to the end here ...I have learned since beginning to lose my hearing the the human race is very very very very very very very mean and selfish. yes as disabled person we do have a need for be treated special for certain reasons for the rest we can be treated just like the rest of you with kindness and love and consideration...
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

I know most deaf people and many hearing people think that the deaf should be treated normally as hearing people, but it will be extremely hard for them to thrive in a complicated world that all hearing people face, especially when the ability to hear is VERY important.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

You don't realize that Deaf people CAN thrive in this world, and they do!!! It is NOT extremely hard for them! The ability to hear is NOT the only way to live, they have eyes. Seeing is way more important than hearing. Why don't you try just plugging your ears, to the point of not hearing at all for one day and see. They're not missing out at all.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

Look around you first, man.. There is no 100% perfect as you think.. It also doesn't tell us who should be the "leader" of this world, man.. And oh hey, what do you think and feel for the parents who have big dreams and hope for their own deaf child(ren)?? We all should think about it before judging that the deaf people should be treated equally with hearing people. Remember, our tongue in words can be too sharp like knife.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: No

Of course not. They can't hear, and hearing people can. How would you treat them equal if they can't hear what you're saying?
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

Yes, this person is retarded if he cannot treat deaf people equally. I am glad he is banned.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

Cheers!!!! I'm in total agreement with you! Thank you!!!!! He has no clue, that's sad.
Debate: Do You Think Deaf People Should Be Treated Equally As Hearing People
Side: yes

whoa who do you think you are if you were deaf how would you fell
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Yes, but sadly, people are very traditional and stubborn. They do not like to see things change, they do not like accepting that people are very different. Of course gay marriage should be allowed! What makes them different? Nothing. Why do people not accept this and move on? I would like to find out.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

Leviticus 20:13King James Version (KJV)13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Quoting bible is as valid agrument as citing Harry Potter .
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

They do not like to see things change, they do not like accepting that people are very different. Of course gay marriage should be allowed! What makes them different? Nothing.So, nothing makes "them", aka the gays, different. Then, why is it sad that "people do not like accepting that people are very different".Or are they different and not different at the same time?
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

It's because marriage is not about man on man or woman on woman. If you want you could change the word or something but leave the holy union alone.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Woman on woman. Acceptable form of pornography but goddammit how dare they try to get married. Am I right?
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

I agree wqith the poster. Marriage is about uniting two lovers who want to be together.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Im still progay, now step. Besides, thou needest to readeth 2 Samuel 1:26.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Hitler, your desperateness to reply with something is showing. All of the things you've said are made up and based on nothing. (Except the stupidity in your brain) Why can't you just accept different genders like each other and that they want to be together? I'm beginning to think your just a failing troll.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Quoting bible is as valid agrument as citing Harry Potter . .
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

My personal opinion on this topic is that nothing is wrong with Gay Marriage! If two people want to be together and take their relationship to marriage then why stop them? It's their love to share not yours.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

If an adult and a child want to be together, why stop them?
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

False analogy fallcy. Those are two sep issues. .
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

Ik, just playing the Devil's Advocate here.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

Okay sorry. .
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

Because a child isn't an ADULT. Marriage equality is to fight for marriage between two consenting adults.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

1) This post is over a year old2) I was going solely by the logic the person I replied to was using. They didn't mention how anyone had to be an adult.Disputing something =/= agreeing with the opposition.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

You used this one on the other side of the debate. Use a new approach.OH and don't forget my favorite! Leviticus 11:3"Whatever divides a hoof, thus making split hoofs, and chews the cud, among the animals, that you may eat."So.... I guess we can't have bacon anymore. GOD DAMMIT
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

If two people want to be together and take their relationship to marriage then why stop them?I have nothing against these people marrying! I would certainly never try to stop them.Just don't ask me to recognize their "marriage", because I won't. And neither will the majoirty which pays taxes to the government. So, they have no right to demand this from the government, either.You see, it's not about society imposing things on them, its them wanting things from society.I'm not from the USA, and I was referring to the situation in my country.But I don't see why it should be different for you.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

No one is asking you to send a wedding gift or "recognize" other people's marriages. The fight for marriage equality is so that if Joe and Adam love each other, they can receive the same benefits as their neighbors Jenna and Roger. That means that if, for example, Adam dies, Joe is considered his next of kin and can receive his inheritance. If Joe gets sick and can't make his own decisions, Adam can be his proxy. You know, things like that.No one cares if you think it's right because it doesn't affect you in any way so sit down and shut up.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

No one is asking you to send a wedding gift or "recognize" other people's marriages.Whoa, hold it there. You might as well have written "nobody is asking you to become the president of Monaco or recognize other people's marriages". So let's skip the wedding gift part, which is obvious demagogy.And get right to the point. The point is, the exact opposite is true in countries where "gay marriage" has been legalized.The state is demanding that people recognize "gay marriage" as marriage. Multiple legal cases against businesses which refuse to service gay ceremonies, are proof to that.Kids are supposed to give 100% acceptance of gay "marriage" when they are asked about it in schools. Lest they and their parents be labeled "bigots" and "haters", and face very real negative consequences.The fight for marriage equality is so that if Joe and Adam love each other, they can receive the same benefits as their neighbors Jenna and Roger.That would have been true if these "fighters" accepted civil unions as an alternative to marriage. As it stands, your statement is a lie.The "gay marriage" activists are fighting not only for the legal benefits, the are hellbent on changing the definition of a word. That change of definition has direct legal implications, which go far beyond implicating legal benefits.This is especially true in countries where the legal system is precedence-based. Like USA and UK. Once the redefinition of marriage has been made legal by a court, the LGBT army of lawyers can and will use this precedent as a bridgehead, to install further and even more ridiculous legislation. What I mean by ridiculous:1. The Californian law which allows cross-dressing perverts to use girls' restrooms in schools.2. The push to prohibit gay conversion therapy.3. The new law draft which, if accepted, will force Christian schools to accept gay students and gay teachers.And many other such "legal" consequences, all of which violate fundamental civil rights.So, this would indeed affect me and other people, in a very direct way. The law is twisted and bent, and rights are taken away, under the guise of "acceptance".You have to do better than using that liberal pseudo-logic, to argue with me.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

I highly doubt Gay Marriage is a sham for divorce lawyers and wedding organizers to get money. Why would you even think that?
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

I don't see anything wrong with it (as long as it's not Ciel x Alois), but as I am not a gay American it is nothing to do with me.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

I am not gay, or lesbian, I am indeed straight. I just thought it was a cute picture. I am not saying I support a Ciel x Alois.. (But they sure do look cute together.)
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Why should you stop two people from loving eachother?Yeah, why should we stop adults from marrying children?
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Yeah, why should we stop adults from marrying children?Pedophiles aren't people. They're monsters! ;)
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

America is not a theocracy. Your argument is invalid.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

This is about same sex marriage between adults, don't bring issues about pedophilia into here. It's irrelevant.
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: No.

I know. Make sure to specify that next time :)
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

It does no harm and it is not your business who marries who .
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

What does no harm? A pedophile marrying a child? Or gays marrying? (Because if it's an adult marrying a child then there is definitely a problem.)
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

You have to be adult to get married which disqualifies paedophilia, why not gays? Who cares what they do?
Debate: Do you think Gay Marriage should be allowed in the USA?
Side: Yes.

Adults in some countries-- (Maybe America too? I don't know. But I do know adults have married children in Europe.) --have married children. And that's my point, who cares if two men, or two women want to marry? It's none of our concern.