azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Americans hold many animals very highly - are they also stupid for not eating dogs and cats during food shortages? Many people no matter how hungry would not eat a dead corpse. Indian food is delicious and just like our country some people go hungry while others eat very well and whose fault is that? Donate to your local food pantry to help hungry people to have the strength to stand on their own two feet. If you are not part of the cure, you are part of the dis-ease.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Vegetarians do not die for the sake of animals. They eat very well indeed, no suffering needed. It is a false belief that animal or human sacrifice ever cleansed anything. A religion that says killing is a sin and then kills is a hypocrite. A human being can "choose" to be an meat eating animal or a "humane animal". We can "choose" not to kill and not suffer the little animals. Intelligence gives us choices.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

If only there was a way of downvoting this to -99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

You are just being a bigot buy saying that. Not everyone is able to afford your vegan visions, others lack the resources.The Indians used Everything they hunted. You are saying Eskimo's don't care about the only resource that allowed them to sustain life. Feel blessed to be in a position to help out the good causes you support. However, ethnocentrism will be more ineffective than effective when it come's to shifting views to meet your own. Are you from the USA?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Actually you save a lot of money on groceries by not buying meat. You can also grow a garden anywhere. Animals require a lot of space to grow. These days we can use plant based products instead of animal based for clothing, etc. No one has to remain in an area with limited resources, you can move. By the way, what cultural standard are you using to judge the USA?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

No, of course they aren't hypocrites. I love cats and dogs. Do I eat steak, hamburgers, pork, and chicken nuggets? Oh yes I do!!! God put cows, pigs, and chickens here for us to eat; but he didn't want us to hate them. Loving the food you eat does not make you a hypocrite. ~! V
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Would you eat dogs and cats?Do you love cows pigs chickens etc?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

No, you ignoramous, I wouldn't eat dogs or cats or both. It was something called an analogy. I like all animals, but i eat some of them to SURVIVE. God said to occupy the Earth and subdue it's creation. ~! V
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I agree with you veronica. Just because you love animals and eat some of those animals that you love doesn't make you a hypocrite. Ya'll are a bunch of vegetarians and animal-rights activists. ~! C
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Thanks Chloe. People are so quick to jump to stupid conclusions about the most trivial issues. We need to concentrate on more important issues like that debate about provided more ammo or conserving ammo for a better purpose. What is a better purpose! And what about that new medical coverage reform bill that Obama is trying to pass. I don't really keep up with it much anymore because it is so socialistic that I am still fuming. This country is in a downward spiral and if we don't start fixing it, then we won't be here next year. ~! V
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Stop concentrating on this debate then... You're being hypocritical again.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Lol this question doesn't have anything to do with vegetarianism or animal rights. Nobody's saying anything about whether or not you can do what you like or not. Only that by doing so you're a hypocrit. It's like somebody from PETA eating steak. That is hypocritical and so are animal lovers who eat meat.BTW just because your friend introduced you and got you to argue for her doesn't mean you're not a dumb redneck republican. lol inbred retaards..
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

You don't need to eat meat to survive.By choosing which animals you love and don't love means you're not an animal lover.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Do you also believe in sacrificing children and stoning people? Bible quotes are always used as an excuse, the final say in how things should be, a blessing to do harm in the name of a God, in a book written by men. You don't need to eat animals to survive. Why not eat dogs and cats? The feelings you have for dogs and cats can be also felt for all living creatures. Prejudice is a learned thing.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I love animals well i have a dog and i still eat lamb and cow that doesn't make me a hypocrite i dont think.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

You love your dog but you don't love animals. It's not so much your a hypocrite as just simply delusional.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I love my animals. I love my meat. Meat is important part of our diets. Also humans eating meat helps stops over propulation of sertin animals. As long as the animal is humanley killed then eating meat makes u a normal person not a hypocrit.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Meat is an important part of "your" diet. A better statement would be I love my "animal meat" since for you there is no distinction between loving animals and loving meat. There is a greater over- population of humans than any animal on earth. To reduce other species on the assumption of over-population and not our own is hypocritical in itself.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I love animals' meat.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Humans need meat to live healthy lives. Those who do NOT eat meat are hypocrites.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Vegetarians do live healthy lives. Vegetarians would only be hypocrites if they were unhealthy from eating their veggies, fruits, nuts, etc. and then claiming to be healthy from eating a non-meat diet. So your statements are not correct.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Healthy life includes regular physical exercises, either from free time or from one's work. If you do not eat meat with that kind of exercise you will lack necessary nutrients and thus be weak and tired and won't be able to perform well.It might be possible to get all those ingredients from eating plants and vegetables but that would be far too expensive, also a very detailed and planned-out diet would be necessary. Not worth the trouble.My statements are correct. But if you have enough money to waste on ridiculous habits like vegetarianism then go ahead.Healthy life also includes being healthy in mind. Vegetarianism rules that out.We are omnivores not herbivores.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Really your statements aren't true at all. Healthy exercise is part of my vegetarian way of life and I have more energy and a healthy weight than those my age that do eat meat. It isn't expensive at all or a complicated diet plan that is needed, actually I save a lot of money eating from the garden. It would be more trouble to raise animals for food and more expensive. A truly healthy mind would be one that does not kill and eat other creatures. We as humans are free to "choose" whether to eat meat or not.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Your statements are long, pointless, and based on non-experience as a vegetarian. In a nutshell, of course a meat eater would consider gardening a "waste of time". Fresh fruits and veggies are not a "complicated" diet nor "toxic". My yearly physical proves that I am healthy. Killing "is" an act of violence, we can choose not to do as meat-eating animals do such as eat poo, among other things. I do lift weights and include other types of exercise, no problem. I do not eat large amounts of carbs. "How life is", is how you make it to be, we can choose. Not enjoying killing is an excellent "only" reason to not eat meat. It doesn't take a high IQ to kill an animal. I do not have to "act". I am free and not imprisoned by what others consider to be truth. When I say I love animals it is a truth. When I first became a vegetarian people everywhere said I would starve to death and other horrors would befall me...all I can say is ignorance can be cured by going vegetarian.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I love animals. I think there's a place for all of God's creatures..., right next to the mashed potatoes and gravy ;)
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Humans are omnivores, have canines & incisors (for eating meat) & eyes in the front of their skull ( as predators do).  Definition of Hypocrite - A person who engages in the same behaviors he condemns others for.Animal Lover is defined as - a person who feels fondness for non-human animalsUntil my physical body evolves into an herbivore/prey I will continue to be true to my species & eat meat. I do not tell others not to eat meat while I still do, hence not a hypocrite. I did not cry when my Father died ( & I loved him dearly) but I do (cry) when animals die = animal lover.I believe everything on this planet has energy including plants. Do they not cry/bleed (sap) when you break off a branch? You think that doesn't hurt them? But it's ok to eat them because they can't look back at you while you're eating them (just an after thought).“Nothing ever truly dies. The universe wastes nothing, everything is simply transformed.”
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Humans can "choose" their behaviors. Meat eating animals sniff butts and eat poo, among other nasties, but humans can choose not to behave and eat as carnivore/omnivore animals do. As you stated, since you do eat meat you must "cry" a lot when an animal you choose to eat dies. Do you cry when you eat a burger?, I think not, therefore a hypocritical statement. Nothing truly dies is a cop-out as to say nothing truly suffers either. Transformation is in the heart. I don't know of any vegetarians that eat trees.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

but I know of many vegetarians that eat vegetables and fruit, WHICH COME FROM PLANTS
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I don't eat the one's I love.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I love animals, I love spending time with animals, I feel pain when i hear an animal die, When i find a dead animal on the road I move it to the side on the grass to stop it from getting even more squashed. I have one Rabbit who I love very much, Me and my wife also look after dogs etc for family. We both refuse to do any activities on holiday that involve animals being used for entertainment. Example being swimming with dolphins or camel back riding. But I eat beef and chicken, I won't eat rabbit as I have a rabbit plus it is not really needed for my diet, I need beef for iron in my body and chicken for protein. Here is my argument: Humans have eaten animals (beef, Pork, chicken) for hundreds even thousands of years, When we are born our bodies are prepared to eat meat, It is FACT. So when we chose to not eat me it is a choice. Everyone who has became a vegetarian has slaughtered people with pets etc to say '' You don't love animals, You eat them '' - you guys are the people that cause such drama. You should look at it this way, We all need meat, Eating meat does not make a person hate animals, They are allowed to love them. It is the circle of life my friend and it is not a hypocritical thing to love and then eat! Boooooooom Lastly using animals for entertainment value is something that is the biggest concern, Eating farmed animals is what us as humans have learnt over many thousand of years, Engaging animals is wrong especially for profit, Yet those people are seen as animal lovers, Example kids say '' Aw they love their little dolphin '' - No they don't, they would not do such job if they did not love them '' - Loving a pet is different, I would never engage my pet but i'd eat meat, Makes me a good person, What would make me a hypocrite would be this......killing an animal for money, Capturing an animal for profit then going home to my dog and knowing that I have done something wrong. That is the issue!!!
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I'm sorry but people who love animals and eat meat are not hypocrites, that is your own opinion and you are allowed to express that. Some people like my self have grown up to eat meat, where i live the national dish is meat, but if i see animals being killed inhumanely then i put my foot down. I eat meat yes, but if i see an animal other than my pets whether it is stray or not i will either help it get back SAFELY to where it came from or let it be. I love animals and on many occasion have risked my life to save animals i have seen. just because we eat meat does no mean that we don't care unless we are doing what these people below are doing to these animals then please do not say we are hypocrites. If you cared about the animals then your would be focusing on them not others. I do not mean to offend anyone, i only voicing my opinion. If anyone does not agree that is fine, people are allowed to disagree. I am currently working on something to help stop this kind of cruel killing.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

nonononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononomaybenonononononononononononononononononononononononononono
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

saying animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrites is like saying plant lovers who eat fruit are hypocrites.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I love animals.But I love myself much much much much much much much more.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Everyone who eats meat is an animal lover, it's just a question of how much of the animal is loved!
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I eat meat because I love animal... Meat ;)
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

No, because who are you to say what i love, and what I don't.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

They aren't hypocrites because meat contains a lot of protein which is good for you.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

No, I eat chicken and fish and I love animals, but that does not make me a hypocrite. Just because an animal lover ate a chicken wing doesn't make them a hypocrite. Saying so is stupid, and to Kinda. wow you're argument is flawed and you use those terms at the end very stupidly.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Umm... yes it does. How can you love animals and then eat them??DDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHH!!!!!!!!I can't understand how you'd want to harm, kill, process, package, burn and then eat something you love.Same as wearing leather or using such items in cars etc.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Dude, you love your dog!You eat chicken and egg! IS that any way wrong!See, you necessarily need not eat the same animal that you love!Any way try more exciting debates!
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

So then you support speciesism? You favour one species (dog) over others (chicken)?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

a - I don't have a dogb - I don't eat chicken or eggs or fishc - loving A dog doesn't mean I'm an animal lover. Just that i love 1 animal.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Kinda, you are nothing more than a vegetarian, animal-rights activist ignoramous who just doesn't understand the question, the fact that he/she has lost this debate, and the simple fact that you are stupid~! V
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Riiiiight..... Children these days....
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

An animal lover loves all animals so you wouldn't catch them with a chicken wing in their mouth. You don't love chickens or fish except cooked on your plate so you don't love all animals. The flaw is in pretending you love and care for all animals while you eat them, that spells hypocrite.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

yes so we know impacts before we test on humans
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

animal testing is wrong....they use poor innocent animals make make-up ndd other products. i think we should protest against it because animals have feelings and families and lives too. we shouldn't try to destroy their lives because of body prducts. we dont need make up to look beautiful. it is wat matters on the inside not the outside. you dont need make up to full fill your day.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

When I'm Bar-B-Q ing and I don't have the right ingredients I'm pretty much left with testing different spices on the little critters. :)
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

This isnt what we are talking about and you know it, What we are talking about is a serious problem where defensless animals are being treated horribly and having things done to them that no human would ever want done to themSo again i say why do we do it to them??
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Actually..., it's really not that big of deal. Sometimes I feel that God, or the universe, or mother nature, is experimenting on me..., us. If life was a little bit nicer to me..., us..., then maybe I would be a little more concerned about it. But until that happens, I wouldn't get my panties in a bunch ;)
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Please clarify because i have no idea what this has to do with what i said.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Life experiments on us humans, we experiment on animals. Better?
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Do you Bar-B them while they're still alive?...............................
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

No. That's just mean ;)
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

What the.......No testing animals or little critters here,even when eating the. It's double harm:Bar-B-Q-ing them AND testing them out!
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

There are 7 billion people on the planet. What are we to eat? ;)
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Well, the alternative is people testing.It depends on the reasons for the tests,If it's to find a cure for human diseases, I'm all for it, no holds barred or whatever.If it's for a new make up line, well, depends on the potential harm. If the worse that can happen is a small rash that'll heal with time or medicine, then go for it.If it's something that may send and animal into deadly convulsions, well, I think there's enough make up on the shelves already.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Looks like we both agree on this one. Couldn't have said it better myself.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Animal is much safer for humans although not for animals, therefore, it makes more sense to test animals than humans.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Animal testing is not actually safer for the humans. The results are fairly useless. Penicillin is poisonous to guinea pigs, and had the researchers relied on animal testing, we would not have the medicine today. Lipitor was also fatal to the animals it was tested on, but it's one of the most effective cholesterol medicines we have available. And think of thalidomide. Great in monkeys, dangerous in humans. Relying on animal testing only means that we are likely to miss out on useful drugs that do poorly in animal tests, and we are likely to release drugs that are harmful to humans.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

Even though you are inactive, I am going to respond.All the examples you brought up actually disprove your point. Scientists rely on more than one type of testing. This is why you have been able to list all those examples where animal or human testing produced negative results. It seems like you are suggesting that FDA approval relies solely on animal testing. This is simply not true.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

I am not saying that, and I apologize if that was unclear. Animal testing is one of the earlier stages of testing, but it's a useless one, and a number of drugs are stopped after being ineffective or dangerous in animal studies in the US, and don't make it into the other stages. My point is animal testing is a cruel and useless method. We have alternative methods that are significantly more accurate. Use those to replace animal testing and we will likely develop more useful medicine.
Debate: animal testing
Side: for animal testing

There are no viable alternatives to animal testing. In vitro and computer models do not account for many of the complex mechanisms of a living organism. You have to use something that is similar to a human being at some point before human testing, at least by current ethical standards. There is nothing more accurate than an animal at this point for complex biological processes. There are several industries that no longer use animal testing due to current laws and regulations.There are already many laws in place that either promote research into alternative methods, require alternative methods when appropriate, or regulate the use of animals for testing.Until science advances much further, there is no way to stop animal testing, only to carry it out responsibly.
Debate: animal testing
Side: against animal testing

Animal subjects do not account for human mechanisms either. Chimpanzees are generally considered to be our closest relatives, from a DNA standpoint, at roughly 70% similarity. They don't get AIDS, their proteins vary from our proteins, which affects cancer studies, they have a different number of chromosomes. Animal testing is not viable - it is inaccurate 92% of the time. 92%! That means it is accurate 8% of the time. I could flip a coin and guess whether or not a medicine was safe. We can use stem cells, tissue samples, epidemiological studies, the in-vitro and computer models you mentioned. Those methods are accurate 90% of the time. I'm not saying you could pick one method to replace animal testing, but a combination would give you a pretty wide picture and would be more accurate and more cost-effective. Using a combination can be done - Pharmagene Laboratories is doing it.