azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Guns are much more widely used for hunting and sport in the USThat’s yet another lie 10 million Max are used for hunting most Americans admit to having them for self defence as you live in the 121st least peaceful country in the world ......Why do us Europeans have to keep educating yanks that don’t know what goes on in their own shit hole of a country ?
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

Jesus this is the stupidest thing I've heard so far. If people want to use it for self defense then there's no problem, especially since they NEED them if they live in an agricultural community. Regardless you're asking that 72 million Americans shed their rights to own a gun because a maximum of 0.005% (roughly 20,000) have used them and it costed a human life. I clearly need no education from an ignorant limey Eurocuck who has no understanding of my history, culture, or country. Have fun in your padded cell of an island lobsterback.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

esus this is the stupidest thing I've heard so far. If people want to use it for self defense then there's no problemBut you denied this yesterday like the dumb American fuck you are you lied when you said the main reason was for hunting , especially since they NEED them if they live in an agricultural community. Yet I live in an agricultural gun free country dummy  Regardless you're asking that 72 million Americans shed their rights to own a gun because a maximum of 0.005% (roughly 20,000) have used them and it costed a human life. LOL you live in the 121 st least peaceful country in the world own it sonI clearly need no education from an ignorant limey Eurocuck who has no understanding of my history, culture, or country. Have fun in your padded cell of an island lobsterback.I’m not a “limey” dummy yanks always think there’s only one country in Europe , American “culture” 🤣🤣🤣 yeah sure , Big Macs , obesity and action movies .......”culture “ 🤣🤣🤣👌You’re killing me buddy
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

But you denied this yesterday like the dumb American fuck you are you lied when you said the main reason was for hunting0.005% is much much more narrow than 1/7th. That statement, which is the statement I made earlier is true. Are you incapable of doing basic math? American “culture” 🤣🤣🤣 yeah sure, Big Macs, obesity and action movies .......” culture “You are an ignorant parody of yourself. I don't know what kind of slav, kraut, froggy, mick, pretzel-maker, wop, or racist country you come from but it changes nothing. You're a fucking euro.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Oh do shut up you uncultured blithering half -wit , better being a cultured European rather than a loudmouthed yank who thinks a Big Mac with a bud lite is the height of sophistication and hails Trump as an “intellectual” power house 🤣🤣🤣👌😎
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

You're seriously the kind of pompous chauvinistic euro who thinks every state is exactly like Texas. Your culture is needing the US and the Soviets to rebuild your shithole continent out of the ashes of WW2 because you're all to racist and stupid to do it youself.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

You're seriously the kind of pompous chauvinistic euro who thinks every state is exactly like Texas. Translation : you realise you don’t like being schooled by a cultured European , get used to it and thank me Your culture is needing the US and the Soviets to rebuild your shithole continent out of the ashes of WW2 because you're all to racist and stupid to do it youself.Ha, Ha you’re hilarious the US rebuilt Europe 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 the US has never even won a war a dozen emaciated rice farmers in Vietnam kicked your burger chomping army of fatties back to your slave loving racist shit hole of a gun crazy country
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

Ha you’re hilarious the US rebuilt EuropeYes. It was called the Marshall Plan.Vietnam kicked your burger chomping army of fatties back to your slave loving racist shit hole of a gun crazy countryEuros had their asses ravaged by men with bows and spears multiple times in Africa. Namely Ethiopia. But go on about how your culture of cousin-fucking aristocrats is superior to that of the American South.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Yes. It was called the Marshall Plan.🤣🤣🤣 That was guilt money paid over not getting involved in the war earlier ......Euros had their asses ravaged by men with bows and spears multiple times in Africa.Sure thing which is why yanks relied on Euros to supply them with slaves  Namely Ethiopia. But go on about how your culture of cousin-fucking aristocrats is superior to that of the American South.“Cousin fucking” this from a rube from the south where interbreeding is seen as a norm , you’re from a nation of uneducated yobs who think that watching Rocky movies while eating a tub of ice cream dressed in a Hawaiian T shirt with a maga hat atop your pin -head is “high culture “ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

That was guilt money paid over not getting involved in the war earlierInadvertently admitting that your continent cannot defend itself from a bunch of meatheads without us.Sure thing which is why yanks relied on Euros to supply them with slavesThe scramble for Africa happened after the Civil War. Are you retarded or just historically inept?“Cousin fucking” this from a rube from the south where interbreeding is seen as a normHere in the Pacific States, we resent the south because it got all it's culture, namely cousin-fucking, extreme racism, and uncultured taste in entertainment from you euro fucks. It's whole lineage is derived from European Aristocrats, slaveowners and settlers. Your disgusting culture has manifested itself as the tumor that is the South. Clearly I was wrong about free higher education if you are all this stupid.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Inadvertently admitting that your continent cannot defend itself from a bunch of meatheads without us.Ohhh this must be the part where you say that the US won the Second World War 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣You guys cannot win wars unless you count Grenada which is the size of my back garden Your very good though at blowing up children’s hospitals and schools in foreign lands and the worlds best at school shootings ....go USA 👌🤣The scramble for Africa happened after the Civil War. Are you retarded or just historically inept?Read what I said you burger chomping half -wit Europeans supplied you idiots with your slavesHere in the Pacific States, we resent the south because it got all it's culture, namely cousin-fucking, extreme racism, and uncultured taste in entertainment from you euro fucks. It's whole lineage is derived from European Aristocrats, slaveowners and settlers. Yet you and you mainly uncultured obese nation of half -wits spend your lives scouring Europe looking for the birth place of your relatives and boring us all to death with your ignorant , loud mouthed opinions when you get here ......you’re a nation of in -breedsYour disgusting culture has manifested itself as the tumor that is the South. That’s funny my culture includes the worlds greatest , writers , artists , musicians yours gives us Hollywood , Disneyland and Mc Donald’s ....oh and Donald Duck Trump 🤣🤣🤣Clearly I was wrong about free higher education if you are all this stupid.Ahh your against free education you prefer to get ripped off in education , and health care fees I love my freebies Regards “higher education “ Americans have colleges of hamburgerology and give out degrees in this , this is “American higher education “ ........you guys are comedy gold 👌🤣🤣🤣🤣
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

Eurocuck moment. If you didn't want all the ignorant Ameicans from the South coming to your country and giving you second hand embarrassment you shouldn't have sent your racist cousin-fuckers out here to steal land and import slaves. You can recite any dead poet or reference any dead artist you want, you have absolutely dick to show for today. Take your Dr Who, gay Harry Potter and overplayed Beatles songs and blow it out your ass. You can go on about Orange Man and MacDonalds all you want. It was people from your continent hopping on YouTube to defend trump for owning the libs and floating Godemporor trump ballons. Not to mention, there isn't a single nation on your continent that doesn't have a McDonalds. Go eat sheep's cock.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Car accidents and the deliberate striking of pedestrians wouldn't be possible without cars.Neither would it be possible for the entire country's workforce to get to their jobs in the morning. You predictably left that part out. If all cars did was kill people they might be comparable to guns.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

Nice going implying that all guns do is kill people and that there's no other application of guns. No hunting, no sports, nothing.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Nice going implying that all guns do is kill people and that there's no other application of guns. No huntingGuns kill things you jaw-dropping idiot. That's literally the only reason they exist. Cars were invented to transport things. Guns were invented to kill things.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

It would reduce gun crime, but that only gets rid of the gun aspectGun crime is exactly what a gun ban is supposed to reduce. Not to mention the fact that it would be quite literally impossible to disarm the cartel and other crime syndicates.The cartels are getting their guns BECAUSE of the slack nature of American gun laws, not in SPITE of them. For God's sake, the circular reasoning you morons use is absolutely shocking:-94,000 weapons were recovered from Mexican drug cartels in the five years between 2006 and 2011, of which 64,000 -- 70 percent, according to Jim Moran -- come from the United Stateshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmugglingoffirearmsintoMexicoGuns are illegal in Mexico, and so they are smuggled in from the United States because they are not illegal in the United States. It's pretty simple to understand if you have an IQ over 90.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

You're asking me to trust a Wikipedia article citing a Politician, which has a 404'd footnote link. Not to mention the fact that they could just get their guns from someone who would be willing to distribute them. Y'know like China or Russia, two nations infamous for selling weapons in the interest of destabilizing their enemies. So even if you could disarm the American people, now you have a disarmed population and a highly militarized criminal syndicate.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

Gimmie a few hours, I'm about to go shooting with a friend of mine in Washington. We'll make sure to have as much fun as we can and be 100% safe just for you.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Proponents of more gun control

Gimmie a few hours, I'm about to go shooting with a friend of mine in Washington. We'll make sure to have as much fun as we canDemonstrating that you have the mentality of an 11 year old boy is hardly going to help you in a debate.
Debate: Gun control
Side: Opponents of gun control

It seems to have helped because you haven't come up with a solid argument yet. All you've done is gotten red in the face and called me an idiot. You've demonstrated you have no understanding of American culture, the American political system, geopolitical black market forces, and the applications of Rohypnol.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

By legalizing abortion, we have crossed a very fundamental line - that human beings are not intrinsically valuable and value is assigned by the whims of an external institution (government) or is assigned by another person (the mother).Abortion has set the precedent that it is moral to kill innocent human beings for the sake of preserving the convenience and alleviating the suffering of others.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

The main point for abortion is that the fetus does not become a human being until the second or third trimester. Until it is sentient, the fetus does not receive the same ethical privileges the mother gets.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Second or third? Which one is it then or is it just a matter of taste? And you do realize that this is a completely arbitrary way to define humanity as it's completely contingent on medical technology? As in, the more medical tech advances, the viability of fetal life also grows meaning that in 5 years we might be able to save 3 month old fetuses. If something like this happens, then we must conclude that we've been killing human beings all along as it turned out that fetal life could be saved well before the third trimester.Secondly, explain to me why sentience is necessary to rights and privileges? A newborn child is not sentient in the same sense the mother is sentient - does that mean that the mother's ethical privileges are more important than the babies? When I'm sleeping I'm not sentient - for the duration of my sleep have I foregone my rights because I'm not utilizing my capacity for sentience?
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Meh, I was just advocating ...
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

Wait a minute though.Why is determining sentience by medical equipment and science worse than determining it by the feelings of people without vaginas and who are not pregnant?I mean, how is the moment of the sperm penetrating the egg more or less arbitrary than the moment the penis goes in the vagina? How about the moment you take a girl on a date? Why not? I mean a human life could have resulted from that.If all we have are feelings and superstitions otherwise, what's wrong with using medical equipment and science to determine something?Sounds like you got this from a Christian Pamphlet titled "How to get a libertarian to agree with you" Subtitle: "Throw the word "government" in there somewhere and ignore it would be government outlawing abortion" - (this assumption from your original post above).
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

All right, I'm getting alot of crap saying,"What about rape?" "What if you father raped you?"Well you know what? Does anyone out there know the percentage of abortions due to rape? I'll tell you.0.88%. That's right! LESS THAN ONE PERCENT!!!! (I'll repeat that) LESS THAN ONE PERCENT! Don't use that argument anymore because I just want to vomit with disgust.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Exactly. Pro-abortionists seem unwilling to accept that most abortions are done after careless, unprotected sex.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

.88% is like 3,000 people (that we know of, most rape goes unreported... and ignoring your numbers are like 99.9% probably inaccurate given past sources you've cited). 1 person is too many. Rape is an argument. You've not answered the debate's questions and your sole point seems to be dismissing a single aspect of a larger issue.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Ultimately.Sometimes the undesirable consequence can be something like, a terrible life for the actual child. This in a sense is selfish, if yourself does not wish a horrible life on a child.Sometimes it could be for reasons of disease, cost to society, health of the mother.Anything can be viewed as selfish. It completely depends on the perspective and who the individual is.Now, is it alwasy wrong?No. Many selfish reasons out weigh selfless reasons.Sometimes selflessness does more harm than good.There are too many variables to determine whether something like this is or is not acceptable.Which is why abortion is no one's business but the mother and their doctor.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

"Sometimes the undesirable consequence can be something like, a terrible life for the actual child. This in a sense is selfish, if yourself does not wish a horrible life on a child."If somebody want's to have unprotected sex, have an unwanted kid, and not be a good parent they are making that choice. I don't wish that on anybody. And that is when it's none of my business. Selfishness is't always wrong but in that case and in the case of abortion for the sake of abortion it sure is. It shouldn't be up to us to decide when somebody is human. Say we go by the third trimester augment or whatever. What's the difference between the day before that deadline and the day after? Why can't the fetus have a say? Why isn't it the fetuses business? If people don't want kids/ aren't prepared to have one it's not that hard not to have one but that's beside the point. Nobody talks about responsibility anymore.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Yeah..., yeah..., I know..., I never dispute. But this time I think I actually agree with you when you say:Sometimes the undesirable consequence can be something like, a terrible life for the actual child. This in a sense is selfish, if yourself does not wish a horrible life on a child.Sometimes it could be for reasons of disease, cost to society, health of the mother.I mean, think of the terrible life a homeless person must be living. I do not wish such a horrible life on that person. The cost to society alone can be unbearable (depending on how many must be taken care of). If you support me in dishing out retroactive abortions, I'll support you with regards to regular abortions. United we stand. What say you ;)
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

I hate to say it, but a vast amount of abortions are NOT done because of rapes/danger to mother & baby. By no means are even these completely acceptable, but there's no excuse for all the others. Honestly, the stupidity of some people...
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Okay, I know that I won't win a lot of fans with this argument, but I feel like I need to be honest with you people. By now, some of you may have noticed that a lot of my views are quite liberal. And for people who like to buy into platforms, it could easily be assumed that I'd be pro-Choice. But I'm not. I actually came down more on the pro-Life side of argument for reasons considerably different than the typical. See, I don't really believe in God. And I think the arguments that we hear the most are kind of religious in nature. The first argument that I never entirely bought is the argument that fetus IS NOT alive yet. That doesn't hold water for me and, if it does, then our laws are logically inconsistent. I never everyone says the fetus is not alive yet (they kind of regard it as a cancer). My first concern with that is that I don't believe that women actually believe that. Every pregnant woman that I have ever met has just been positively glowing, with this sense of "there's a little person living inside of me". I don't really believe that women think their fetus is dead or not living. Furthermore, most states have legislation on the books that recognizes the life of the fetus (and I'm not just talking about abortion). In most states, if some psycho kills a pregnant woman, he's charged with two counts of murder (the woman and the baby). In most states, if you do something to cause the fetus to die, you can be charged with that as well. I have never been able to honestly sell the argument to myself that the fetus is not alive yet. I don't think anyone truly believes that.The existing foundation of our laws is based upon the right to privacy (Roe v. wade).But I don't buy that either. Yes, I believe in the right to privacy, but emergency police powers supercede the right to privacy. That is: the police can't come waltzing into my house whenever they feel like it. However, if someone is in my house and they're strangling me in front of my window and the police can see it happening from the street, they can't just shrug their shoulders and say 'well, we don't have a right to go into his house." The fact that they have reason to believe (THEY CAN SEE IT) that my life is in real danger supercedes my right to privacy. Yes, they can come into my house, because they see a crime taking place. The right to life is above the right to privacy. Privacy doesn't hold water in this scenario. YOu can't have a society that both recognizes the life of the fetus and yet refuses to protect it. Like I said, it's not really a religious argument. If I become convinced that the fetus is not alive, then I'm likely to think differently. But like I said: I don't think anyone HONESTLY believe that.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

I'm going to have to say true according to most people's morality. Some people like to say "unless rape or incest," but even then you are admitting that there is something important about the life of a fetus.To abort a fetus is selfish. It is for your own benefit, which is selfish. The consequence is the death of what most people consider a human being, which most consider to be undesirable.However, selfish acts shouldn't be condemned. Selfishness is the backbone of progression. If we banned abortion just because it's selfish we'd have far more men and women enslaved to the system of child rearing, something that ruins most potential of greatness if that child was unwanted.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

It's great that you're thinking outside the box really it is. But why should somebody be denied rights just because they're inside of somebody opposed to being outside of somebody? Why is potential not a factor? Why should our constitution not apply to somebody because they haven't been pushed out yet? Is that not discrimination?
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

Thats what Hitler did! Yay for Nazi America!The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Well, that depends. Is child rearing a blessing or enslavement? Dude, we should create that debate. ;)
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Well, it's enslavement if the person does not want this child.A blessing if they do.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Of course it is. But that does not mean the action is wrong by any means.
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: False

But the fact that it doesn't necessarily mean that doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't mean that. o.0
Debate: Abortion is a selfish action to alleviate an undesirable consequence
Side: True

Ha, I stood on the side of the road for half an hour holding up a sign that said abortion kills children and only got nine negative responses, mainly from people who were smoking and in beat up cars. The rest were positive. Honks, thumbs up, waves, and there was probably ten times more of them. there was also a large group of people who didn't respond. In reality, if just a few more of these people moved to pro life, abortion would be illegal. Your smaller than you think. There are reasons why sex is for married couples and clearly you people are too dumb to figure out why. You'll never get anywhere good if you live like that.