azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

Given these circumstances, does a dad have the right to block an abortion in exchange for a "synthetic option", so that he may raise his child? If he can do this, can he demand child support from the mother?If one donor (be it father or mother) wants nothing to do with the child and the other does, I believe that the onus is on the person who wants the child to raise it. You can enter into a legal contract before the birth to iron out the nitty gritty. My question on a woman raping the man and suing was more of a curiosity on what you thought regarding it.I would love a process like that, where there is a synthetic womb. I think it would satisfy both parties in terms of abortion.You don't have to respect it if you think it is terrible.  Fair enough, what I was meaning is that I respect your right to an opinion, but I didn't word it the way I meant it. I enjoy debating with you since you keep it interesting and respectful as well.
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

If one donor (be it father or mother) wants nothing to do with the child and the other does, I believe that the onus is on the person who wants the child to raise it.Why wouldn’t we maintain the current standard? Whomever is absent owes the one who is present. Would you suggest changing the current standard?
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

Why wouldn’t we maintain the current standard? Whomever is absent owes the one who is present. Would you suggest changing the current standard?Are you suggesting that chickens are not birds? Whomever claimed that something has to fly in order to be classified as a bird? Moreover, what does that have to with the price of fish in the first place? Your fallacious reasoning is very tiresome to read, Amarel.
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

Your...reasoning is very tiresome to read, Amarel.Then stop.
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

Then stop.A perfect case in point. You can't write anything capable of keeping people awake and that's somehow my fault. The global suicide rate increases by 0.3 percent every second you spend writing words. You're more boring and irrational than a fucking barnacle museum. Give it a rest son, hey?
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

You are a Pussy Leftist and do not try to justify a position because you can't and why because just like Leftist are they want to ban who they don't like. Here is what the Leftist agenda is -  What you cannot ban you want to make mandatory and what you make mandatory then you ban it
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

Because whomever is absent may not have wanted the child to begin with. If you demand a child be...for lack of a better term...incubated, you take responsibility. With or without the opposite partner.
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Good, if you sell coat hangers

Because whomever is absent may not have wanted the child to begin with.That’s the way it is now, and those people are judged harshly. I don’t see why we should change it just because the father is now able to complete the process.
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Yes, if you wanna rule wombs

As the child is born there is no reasonable argument as to when that child's life began If one really think of fetuses and five-year-olds as on par with one another, abortion is homicide. That said, I suspect very few people really think that a fetus and a five-year-old are moral equivalents, they instead play this game where they let on they believe they are moral equivalents in an effort to carry the argument.I bet very few of these ( except for those like foam within ) would call for the law to charge a woman with child murder one of societies most heinous crimes, because they do not see the moral equivalency but yet pretend to do so.  Are pro lifers moral gradualists? Do they in fact regard themes of relatively lowly moral status at the beginning of the fetuses lives,and of greater moral standing as time passes. It seems to me they see the difference but won’t admit itPatrick .S.Tomlinson challenged one of the central notions used by ‘pro-lifers’ that life begins at conception, and that therefore, a human embryo holds the same value as a human child.Speaking to his 25,000 followers, Tomlinson says that a decade ago he came up with a scenario which shuts down the idea, and that in all that time he’s never had an honest answer. Whenever abortion comes up, I have a question I've been asking for ten years now of the 'Life begins at Conception' crowd. In ten years, no one has EVER answered it honestly,” Tomlinson tweeted. He goes on to explain a scenario whereby you are in a fertility clinic when the fire alarm goes off. Before you escape, you have the option to save either a five-year-old child who is pleading for help, or a container of 1000 viable human embryos.“Do you A) save the child, or B) save the thousand embryos?“ he asks.“There is no 'C.' 'C' means you all die.”In a decade of asking the question, Tomlinson claims he has never had an honest response from people opposed to abortion.“They will never answer honestly, because we all instinctively understand the right answer is ”A.“ “A human child is worth more than a thousand embryos. Or ten thousand. Or a million. Because they are not the same, not morally, not ethically, not biologically,” he tweeted.“No one believes life begins at conception. No one believes embryos are babies, or children. Those who cliam are trying to manipulate you so they can control women.”
Debate: Alabama outlaws abortion. No exceptions for rape or incest. PRISON if violated. Good Law?
Side: Yes, if you wanna rule wombs

SUCKS to be YOU !!!!!!!!!! Are you EXCON or BRONTORAPTOR both of you are ASSHOLE BUDDIES ????????????????The STATE of ALABAMA has put you STEWARDS of CHILDREN on a PATH you cannot UNDERSTAND nor CONTROL because push back is a CONFUSED WORLD for you TROLLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!NEW YORK applauds for KILLING CHILDREN after they are born and you FUCKIN IDIOTS just GOLF CLAP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!Well guess what you LITTLE SOCIALIST GURLS people are watching and Al Gore's Internet provides all that information.SOCIALIST GURLS you better get some control on the internet and if you don't all your dreams will be destroyed because you will not have the STATE RUN media that you dream of !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Muslims have amassed an army of people willing to risk their lives in the interest of values that they hold at the deepest level.You got blinders on.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Muslims are 1 religion. We are talking about ALL wars being caused by some sort of religion.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Nope, there are more types of wars that aren't based on being divinely righteous.For example, when Napoleon captured Spain, it wasn't religiously inspired in any way.More recent examples might be Bangladesh War and the Cold War.Many are just vaguely inspired by religion, like the WWII.Some just have further religious consequences without being based on it, like the Mongol conquests.The others, like colonisation wars and crusades, are what fit your criteria.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

You dont accept the premise I put forward concerning the nature of religion being "what people hold as sacred". Instead you think religion in strictly theistic terms. Now we could debate that elsewhere, but what you are doing here is denying the first principles, and as the Latin proverb goes..."There is no arguing with one who denies first principles"
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

I agreed to that premise, as was evident by the first statement there. Latin proverb? Well, it was mentioned first by Aristotle, and the Roman empire wasn't too friendly for the older Greek things. Especially after Christianity was established.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Reading your first post, it seemed to me that you thought that in order for motivation for war to be rightly classified as "religious" it must be based on a sense of "divine righteousness". So your category of what you classify as "religious" is narrower than the one I put forth in the debate description. Under your understanding of religion, not all wars are fought for religious reasons. I get that. But...If you viewed religion as I do ala: Group unity according to shared sacred values. Sacred meaning "considered of extreme importance") Donf you think " All wars are religiously motivated" makes sense according to this broader view of religion?Tbe source of the quote/proverb isnt as important as whether it conveys a truth. If you truly accept the premise and can show a fault in the logic that would be neat
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Obviously, you can't convince millions of people to be prepared to die without invoking important things. There's nothing insightful about it... Soldiers aren't empty and arbitrary loyalists... Nothing another bit of stretching can't handle.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Understand why a values based view on the nature of religioin is superior to thinking of religion as "That which concerns the divine" and youll have your insight
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

I see the question more as an attempt to controversy. If you had rather worded it in terms with mutually more agreed meaning without using "religion", there wouldn't be anything worth much consideration.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

The basic controversial belief of mine is that those who dont think of themselves as religious, are mistaken. What we have are variant expressions of religion, not religious vs nonreligious groups. You have to be not very thoughtful at all, or have a special set of blinders on not to realize that what religion (a universal human phenomenon) is isn't summed up well in the first definition of your favorite dictionary.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

You are quite right. Your thought is very deep and attentive. (No one has clicked 'Support' up to now and I by the way want to see what colour the word is... as I found that 'Dispute' and 'Clarify' are in different colours)
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

It used to be in some colour as the 'Favour' button... but that's now removed. It was redundant, anyway.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

False. Stalin and Mao were Atheists who liked to kill people by the millions with no need for cause. Unless of course, you are admitting that Atheism is a dogma.http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/maos-great-leap-forward-killed-45-million-in-four-years-2081630.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/04/world/major-soviet-paper-says-20-million-died- as-victims-of-stalin.html
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Stalin or Mao never claimed they were going to war in the name of atheism or claimed they were killing people because of atheism .
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

So, what, are you claimg the Gulf War and Operation Iraqi Freedom were done in the "name of Christianity"? Get out of here with that junk.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Who's saying that ? Do try and keep up ..................
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Your claim: "Stalin and Mao never committed war in the name of Atheism". Okay. Simple logic: name us a modern war that was declared in the name of a religion. I'll wait.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Oh dear 🙀 what about George fucking Bush ........ fucking ouch 👌😊George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month.Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."Mr Bush, who became a born-again Christian at 40, is one of the most overtly religious leaders to occupy the White House, a fact which brings him much support in middle America.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Oh poor thing. You just plastered yourself by circling back against your own logic. Being an atheists doesn't mean you did it in the name of atheism. Uh huh. Being Christian doesn't mean you did it in the name of Christianity. I know Dermot. It's like magic how logic works...
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Not nice being caught is it 🙀 Here is what you said .......Your claim: "Stalin and Mao never committed war in the name of Atheism". Okay. Simple logic: name us a modern war that was declared in the name of a religion. I'll wait.But George Bush did indeed do it in the name of religion and he stated so 🙀 Stalin or Mao never claimed to be doing it in the name of atheism ......Your logical skills are not very magical are they ...... OUCH owned again 🙀
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Your logical skills are not very magical are they ...... OUCH owned againYou actually have to fulfill the requirements of the burden of proof in the debate. You only have 10,000 wars to go through to meet said burden.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Oh your butt is hurting 🙀 still no arguments over on the true side dummy whys that ?
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

You argued against my claim that "not all wars are religiously motivated" on this side. So... go ahead. The crowd is getting antsy waiting on you to provide your burden of proof.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

You don't even know what you're saying anymore and now I see why you've taken the crown of dumbest on create debate 👌😊
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

You lost the debate by being ignorant enough to try and argue for the unarguable. Anything else? Would you like an "I got schooled by a real debater" trophy? Guess not. Here, have a can of spam.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

😱 still crying are you 😫 I guess you can go off and open yet another account and continue trolling 😢😢
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

So you admit defeat. That's progress. Maybe you'll be more than a fry cook at McDonalds. Then again...
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Yes I admit I defeated you ... again . I know Mc Donald's is classed as fine dining amongst trailer trash like you we don't really use that tripe here 😱 How's the 34 houses 😂😂😂
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

And it is too stupid to at least change its language when using dupe accounts....
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

i know Mc Donald's is classed as fine diningNo. It's where you actually work and will continue to work until you die of typical atheist depression in your late 30's because you have the comprehension skills of a dead squid.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Yes , for trailer trash like you , so your job in Macs ain't going too well 🙀 and you're depressed and over thirty .... plus your incredibly stupid and living in a trailer park ... I feel for you 😿Not surprisingly you are familiar with the alleged comprehension skills of a dead squid ..... that's an awful way to talk about your poor Mammy 😳
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

1)I'm happy as a meadow lark. My life far exceeds most people's.2)I have a lake house and a house in okc.3)All I heard on the last part was blah blah blah, I'm a banana gobbling, knuckle dragging chimp. Anything else?
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Yes indeed , you actually get very wound up and upset god bless you , I know about your 34 houses as you do go on a bit ......That's decent of you to admit you're a knuckle dragging chimp and you're as happy as a lark because you are rather bird brained 🙀
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

So Cartman's dupe account, in 20 posts couldn't meet the burden of proof for the argument he took on. Now there's a surprise. The childlike intelligence is cute... to someone somewhere. Maybe we can find an old man who you'll enjoy, who will keep you in a dungeon with plenty of lotion.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Still sore ? In fairness you're getting kicked all over the site and if you enjoy getting butt fucked by old men well go for it ..... your 34 houses have their uses after all ..... Bronto = 🐔💋.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Talking to yourself in the mirror is futile. Would you like a Playboy and a cup so that you can think clearly and put logical arguments together?
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Yet you keep doing it 🙀 still butt sore are you ? .................
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

You still haven't proven that "all wars are religiously motivated", and proving that wars started by Atheists were religiously motivated will be an even greater chore, an impossible chore. You're a bad debater. You did not meet your burden of proof. You did not win. You did not come close to winning. Point of fact? You got your little ass kicked.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Maybe that's why I'm on the false side and maybe that's why I never stated all wars were religiously motivated , if I'm incorrect please point out where I said otherwise ? Let's see what you said .............Oh poor thing. You just plastered yourself by circling back against your own logic. Being an atheists doesn't mean you did it in the name of atheism. Uh huh. Being Christian doesn't mean you did it in the name of Christianity. I know Dermot. It's like magic how logic works........... I proved my point as in I'm asking you to prove where Mao or Stalin claimed they were going to war in the name of Atheism bet you can't ?I mentioned only one war where George Bush did indeed claim he was on a mission from God are you denying this .You tell everyone they're a bad debater actually looking at debates yesterday you've told 5 people the same thing and you always do when the debate goes against you .So tell me where I said all wars were religiously motivated ?Why do you have to lie and claim I said things I did not say ? That logic keeps getting you and your failure to read what people say instead of what you claim they say shows how poor you are at debating , debating is not for you buddy you're just not good at it are you ?
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

So in 2,000 posts you never had the nut sack to create hardly a thread? Bwahahahaha! Cartmanomics at work. Hide hide hide hide, and only create a few debates that are "safe". You're a freightened little clown.....
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Still stalking me , I've really upset you haven't I ?Yes I see as the great debater the best you can do is challenge ..... Nowastain to a debate because he hammered you on his thread ....Now that's beyond sad and he ..... turned you down 😂😂😂😂😂
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

You gave the same answer copy and pasted for 20 posts.Looked like Stain got schooled again. He had no rebuttal again. And besides, no one sides with Stain, so I'm assuming that you are Stain. More of that deductive reasoning that you can't wrap your mind around. And? You got schooled on the how can you know how many rapes were not reported if they weren't reported point. You're making it easy for me to clean house with arguments that are that bad...
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Ahhh , you don't like people copy and pasting 😿 and I'm glad I have you counting my posts , after 20 comes 21 if you're wondering ( I know you're American) So you think I'm Stain now 🤔 good that means I beat you ..... again , and deductive reasoning is not your strong point is it ? Oh dear ,you don't like being a member of a country with highest rape stats 😢 You should sue those nasty people who make up stuff about the good old US 😢 regards cleaning house well again you did claim incorrectly Sweden had the highest rates until you were corrected ..... again .......How's your research coming on all the wars you guys won ?🙀
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

Ahhh , you don't like people copy and pastingI do like people copying and pasting. If you are so good at it, then why can't you provide us any links to the statistics you are claiming? Because you have the brains of a headless lizard.good that means I beat youNot actually. 1)You couldn't provide any sources for you claims, which is an automatic loss. 2)You can't see the logic that you can't claim something wasn't reported if.... it wasn't reported. Guessing is a horrible debate style. You lost twice.Oh dear ,you don't like being a member of a country with highest rape stats 😢 You should sue those nasty people who make up stuff about the good old USStill no citations or links. Whew, you're taking it hard in this debate. Why don't you just grab your ankles now and get ready for me to come in...Sweden had the highest rates until you were corrected ..... again1)You haven't provided any stats on Sweden.2)You've provided no links on stats on Sweden.3)The shallow end of the pool for the rookies is over there. Maybe you should try it before you drown and make a fool of yourself. Oops... too late. Oh well, I tried.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

Oh yeah like you're citations and links 🙀 Read it again and weep asshole  US The super power of the world is at the first position in the race of rapes. Males are majorly the rapist holding a proportion of 99%. Out of all the victims, 91% are females while 9% are males. The U.S Bureau of Justice Statistics states that 91% of rape victims are female and 9% are male, and nearly 99% of rapists are male. According to the National Violence Against Women Survey, 1 in 6 U.S. women and 1 in 33 U.S. men has experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime. More than a quarter of college-age women report having experienced a rape or rape attempt since age 14. Out of all, only 16% of the total cases are reported. Outdoor rape is not common in USA rather most of the rape cases takes place inside homes.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: false

The super power of the worldSo you openly admit that the U.S. is "the superpower of the world". Well that killed your other arguments. Hell, I don't even need to make rebuttals. Ican just let you dismatle your own claims.
Debate: All wars are religiously motivated
Side: true

I forgot Americans don't do sarcasm 🙀.........................