Debate: DO YOU SUPPORT PRESIDENT OBAMAS DECISION TO BUILD A MOSQUE AT GROUND ZERO
Side: No

The theory of evolution keeps 'advancing.' Since the days of Darwin it has become more precise and exact! Have you ever asked yourself this question, is it true that everytime an objection is raised to evolution scientists tweak it's definition? Its definition doesn't keep changing. The details of gene flow across species and populations are ascertained with greater clarity. Extinct species are found, and new molecular data helps us determine relationships in ancestry.So why is it that evolution hard coded us with religious beliefs in a God that doesn't exist? Science suplies a brilliant sounding answer; you see this is how it works... I already answered this question.But wait, what on Earth would morality have to do with survival of the fittest? Science supplies another impressive sounding addition to the way it works; well you have to factor in this detail of the microorganism... I already answered this question.The more objections that get raised to evolution the more exact and detailed it becomes, and it always sounds so impressive and brilliant. No matter what objection you have to it science just say "Well yeah yeah see, that's how it operates..." Well what are they doing? Only thing they're doing is analizing how everything behaves and saying "Yeah that's how evolution works."Welcome to modeling animal behaviour using science.And again with the talk about peer reviewed papers instead of the actual arguements. I don't want to hear the term peer review when I ask why the Cambrien Explosion had a ton of life forms appear all at once when your precious evolution is supposed to be slow and gradual. They didn't appear all at once. An explosion of diversity occurred over millions of years. It is geologically fast but not fast for evolution. You also ignored the part where I said that invertebrates don't fossilise well, so once vertebrates evolved, suddenly the fossil record improves tremendously.I don't want to hear about 'peer reviews' when I ask you why there is no transitional fossils when even Darwin himself admitted that if they don't start popping up by the thousands then his theory is wrong.There are thousands of transitional fossils. Creationism works by simply ignoring it. It ignores the fossils because they don't fit creationism.http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html You do what I used to do all the time, you totally overrate what "They Say", what "The Experts Say!" It's Bullshit! THe whole world has an agenda.Paranoia bleeding onto facts.The universe is not comparable to your 'expert physician' analagy. Do you really think anybody has the entire universe on an operating table right in front of them like an expert physician does?So you're arguing that we forgo listening to people who study the universe and life and treat them on equal footing with ignorant people who just started school.Evolution has yet to give a good answer for the origin of life ever. You can't compare that to an expert who has all his data sitting right in front of his face.Evolution doesn't cover the origins of life. It covers the diversification of life. Abiogenesis covers the origin of life.You may as well blame Newtonian Mechanics for not explaining how gravity got here.You can't compare that to an expert who has all his data sitting right in front of his face. You are really giving these scientist way too much credit (as i once did) they have SO much undiscovered information it's ridiculous. They might as well be philosophers not scientists.I trust the scientists because unlike your bedfellows they actually bring us results. You know, the whole peer-reviewed articles thing? They bring us hundreds every year, with new findings. Your bedfellows just bring excuses "There is a conspiracy to deny us freedom."I repeat myself, they don't even know where the oil went from the explosion in the gulf, IN OUR OWN PLANET, Not biology.but they know how life started, they have the universe figured out, they know life evolved yet we have about 4 questionable fossils they claim to be 'transitions' when their should be millions and millions!Fossils are rare, so we have thousands. We also have genetic sequences which corroborate evolution by showing our genetic relatedness with the animals.You need to think about the specific factors for yourself and come up with your own conclusions (or your best guess). You can't say 'They Say' 'They Say' all the time, because 'They' are full of shit!Don't listen to the experts, just reinvent the wheel born from ignorance and personal prejudice. That's what you're arguing for. You're wrong and are trying to character assassinate those who prove you wrong.