Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Magic is deception or "trickery", this statement is purely opinion on your part. God snapping his fingers and bringing all of creation into existence, without an explanation as to how, is magic. Do you remember the definitions I showed you? It is a belief there is no God or the disbelief in the existence in any deity. We have discussed this at length already. I was trying to shorthand our discussion, obviously I can't do that anymore with you. 'Disbelief' and 'belief' still have completely opposite meanings and are not interchangeable. Either atheists have beliefs, or they don't; make up your mind and stay consistent, at the very least. This does not change the fact that the atheist belief is a dogma. It falls into the category of secular religion. You base your assumptions from emotion. Your feeling is the only 'evidence' you can present. The conclusion of atheists is based on a complete lack of evidence for God. This is perfectly good reason not to believe in something, or at least to withhold belief until something convincing is presented, and this is not dogmatic, it is practical. What discussion is this? The history of our debates is as accessible to you as it is to me.Atheism is the disbelief in any deity.There you go, you finally got it!“Main Entry: disbelief Part of Speech: noun Definition: doubt, skepticism Synonyms: atheism, distrust, dubiety, incredulity, mistrust, nihilism, rejection, repudiation, spurning, unbelief, unbelievingness, unfaith Antonyms: belief, trust”http://thesaurus.com/browse/disbeliefTo not believe in something you have to have some kind of way to disprove it. I ask again, how would one go about disproving that nonexistence of anything? In order to think someone is probably lying when they say a genie just granted them three wishes, you do not need to prove that genies don't exist – because you can't. This does not mean you must believe that genies do exist.Especially, if you want to state as a fact there is no God.Which I haven't and wouldn't.With atheism you are specifically saying you don't believe in God. This would not be an infinite number of religions.With aunicorniasm you are specifically saying you don't believe in unicorns. With aleprechaunism you are specifically saying you don't believe in leprechauns. With azeusism you are specifically saying you don't believe in Zeus. With acactopusism you are specifically saying you don't believe in this cat/octopus hybrid I just made up and drew on the side of my homework. So on, and so on, literally forever. Presto, infinite religions.  I know God's word is the truth.Sorry, you don't. You just think you do.He tells us there are no other gods but Him. Therefore, I know those other creatures don't exist.Since when are unicorns and mermaids gods? Also, pretty sure plenty of other deities have claimed to be the only one/ones, explicitly or implicitly. I take the word of God on absolute authority. His word is my evidence. I believe in His works in creation, and science proves many of the acts in the Bible happened (the Flood). Looks like you got confused. Real science disproves this stuff, not proves it. You have no foundational belief.Hmm...this sounds like something someone would need to have a religion, don't you think? Good thing you're not trying to claim atheism is a relig—oh wait...You don't have an answer for your origin.Origin of life: abiogenesis. Origin of homo sapiens: evolution. Origin of me, personally: my parents.On another note, why are you so afraid of the possibility that some questions cannot yet be answered? Better to admit a lack of knowledge, and search for truth, than to make something up and blindly believe it.  For whatever reason you refuse to recognize your Creator. I am happy to recognize the things for which there exists convincing evidence.