azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Like did America not win both world wars and also and many more as well?"America only joined the World Wars after Britain started to win, also America has never won a war on its own."We dominated in both wars."You joined in the latter half of both World Wars."Even though the Atomic Bomb droppings were a little harsh in my opinion we weren't going to be pushed around. We aren't afraid to wage war with anyone. Especially Great Britain."If you're so 'unafraid' to declare war on nations then what was with your governments isolationist policy at the start of WWII?"Now i agree with you excellent example for they are correct, but if you do a tad bit of research Britain got their butts handed to them by America. America was never afraid of Britain in the first place especially when the Boston Tea Party occurred. "I think you'll find that if you did some research. The American Revolution was primarily between the colonies in America. The loyalists were supported by Britain while the rebels were supported by the French, Spanish and Dutch empires. How you can possibly claim that the American Revolution was solely won by Americans is beyond me."We also have many more weapons than the British do especially nuclear war heads. They have about 220+ warheads, but America has 5,113 warheads. But wait here is a kicker........the cold war. We waged a war that Great Britain couldn't possible handle."What the heck are you on about? Britain was you're ally in the Cold War. And the amount on warheads doesn't matter it only takes a couple to end the world."Or the Cuban Missile Crisis? Yes we also handled that too."Hooray! America successfully launched a blockade on a nation several hundred times smaller than it is, that must be one of your few military acheivements."Or the Cuban Missile Crisis? Yes we also handled that too. I could never imagine Britain trying to handle those situations especially when Cuba and The Soviet Union were against one country alone? No. Britain could never have dealt with that the way we did. Here were the results:- Withdrawal of the Soviet Union's nuclear missiles from Cuba- Withdrawal of certain United States' nuclear missiles from Turkey and Italy- Agreement with the Soviet Union that the United States would never invade Cuba without direct provocation- Creation of a nuclear hotline between the United States and the Soviet Union- Fidel Castro's position as Cuban leader strengthened"Britain created the modern world, I have given you a list of several British achievements. How can you possibly compare all of that to a small skirmish with a tiny nation that the US won?"Now we have our negatives in this event. Britain could have kept the world at peace for centuries, but it simply cannot have stopped a nuclear throw down with would result in an ultimate catastrophe."The British successfully stopped the French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, Russians, Japanese, Chinese, Germans, Belgians and Italians from creating and empire which dominated the world. Please say how we couldn't have preventing a tiny nation like Cuba from building a missile base next door to us?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Great Britain" too bad you guys can't put a "great" in front of your name. If you did, it would be false advertising.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Briton elitist liberals are trying to convert America to atheism. No big surprise.I hope to god you blinded fools will some day see the truth.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

The British Empire was a better superpower than America will ever be.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Downvote without comment? A cowardly move.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

You hinted at "was" a better empire. Great Britain nearly has no Empire compared to modern America. We are too far advanced to even be compared to such a country. Great Britain is a very powerful nation, but they don't come close to the sheer power that America can portrait.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Great Britain nearly has no Empire compared to modern America."America doesn't even have an Empire, it's sphere of influence is massively inferior to that of Great Britain's."We are too far advanced to even be compared to such a country. "I'm sorry? Please explain how you are in anyway more advanced than us?"Great Britain is a very powerful nation, but they don't come close to the sheer power that America can portrait."At one point Great Britain was so powerful that we administered the longest period of world peace mankind has ever seen.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I prefer Great Britain to America mainly because, yes I am patriotic... but not blindly so. I prefer our small little tea-drinking, damp, rainy nation because it is so remarkably British. Where else can you stand under a leaky bus shelter in the pouring rain eating fish and chips out of newspaper and complaining about 'Good old British weather' to whoever bothers to listen?Alright, so tea is not grown in Britain - it is grown in India. But we made it our own. What about fish and chips? Fish and chip shops are a predominantly British thing. London buses? Red post boxes?Whereas America, forgive me, is such a mishmash of cultures and viewpoints and is such a new nation that it barely has any tradition at all. It is an immigrant nation. I like my roots.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

i whill destroy amrica britan always win ile get you america mark my words you whill pay
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I'm just gonna go ahead and say Britain because I'm Canadian. I think it's me duty.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Your thinking of france not britain canda was made by france then brtain invaded
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"canada was made by the france" wow. first of all, learn how to type a grammatically correct. and second, who's on the Canadian dollar?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Better accent. Superior slang. Splendid telly. Proper fish and chips. An entertaining royal family. What more could a chap ask for?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

We have unlike America our own language and culture, not just some we have copied of others.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

America is falling apart I have so many reasons to choose Britain over america
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

In what ways, specifically, do you think that America is falling apart?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Sorry, but if you're from the United States, then you should know that America describes two continents. Great Britain and the United Kingdom has more history then the United States ever will. Whispers That's a nice three hundred years you got there pal. Please go back to your crippling nation and entertain your white, baptist, suburban soccer moms. Until you get the number of homeless, unemployed, and illegals down, try fighting with a nation that you can actually win against, like Mexico.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Yes. People who say "I love animals" but eat meat do not love animals. They might love their pet, but that's it. Animals do not ONLY include you cat and dog, but including ALL animals. Including the chickens, cows, and pigs that you kill. Next time, say "I love cute and fluffy animals".
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

I have to dissagree, just becasue you eat meat doesn't mean you don't love animals. I love animals and eat meat it's just the circle of life, I bet most of the animal documentors eat meat so whats the difference? so now I sayI love animals but that doesn't change the fact that they taste good! especially bacon.To the guy who made this debate you spelt hypocrite wrong XD
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

You mean you like animals so much that you agree with them being killed, just so you can eat them? Isn't that like a rapist saying he loves women so much that he rapes and kills them? Hey and if the bacon and processed meat kills you http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/07/processed-meat-scare-bacon-sandwich-health I don't think general health care should pay for your treatment as it was your own doing.But I am glad to see that you can spell what you are right, a blazing hypocrite
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

It is certainly not the circle of life. You fail to understand that humans evolved as a prey species, not predator. We simply do not have the biology of natural predators. We only became predators when we began developing tools. Take any strict carnivore and they have a jaw that does not move side-to-side like ours, because they are using all the jaw muscles to bite into flesh. We use our jaw to grind, like other omnivore/herbivores. If you truly think we are predatory species go bite into a cow and see if you get anything more than a mouth full of hair.This will get lengthy so my last example will be our digestive system. The digestive systems of carnivore is much shorter from intake to output, on average 3 times less than ours, because meat is toxic if it stews inside us for to long. We have long digestive tracks which enable to us to break down plant fiber better, because it takes longer to break it down.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Then explain to why we need the proteins and other nutrients that are in meat? Why do we have canines? We don't have canines to tear through a frail piece of lettuce. We have them for meat. Now I don't beleive in evolution so don't give me any we got canines through evolution since I won't take it as an answer.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

You are not an animal lover if you eat meat...plain and simple. It is not "the circle of life" either. Humans were not, despite much objection, carnivorous. Wake up. You have a choice. Meat eaters are straining the world's resources and many would argue, are the ultimate source of war and strife for how can we truly care for and love one another when we rape and murder animals?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

No we re not carnivorous, that's kind of obvious. We are omnivores we wouldn't of been made with canine teeth if we weren't and it most certainly is the cycle of life, ruthless hunting is wrong but hunting or killing a farm animal to survive is fine. Would you tell a pack of wolves to not hunt that deer because its meat? No it's in there nature. We are omnivorous we can eat both and feel fine. Just because you eat meat doesn't not make you an animal lover you can love and study animals even work as a vet and still eat meat. I'm working on being a person who rescues animals and I eat meat. I'm simply completeing the circle like Mother Nature intended.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

I'm 12 and i love all animals and i want to open an animal rescue centre. I am a vegetarian. To be honest, if you claim to love animals and then eat meat it is hypacritical. All animals include the animals that people eat, e.g. pigs, cows, chickens, etc. If you truely love animals then I advise you should convert to vegetarianism, if not then thats your own choice.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

only supposed Animal lovers will eat meat, simple. If you Really care and love animals you would take a stand against terrible situations the capitalist meat industry commits for profit. you might not be a hypocrite but definitely a Coward.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

i stand very strongly on the side of animal rights but i do eat meat and that doesnt make me a hypocrite. theres this thing called the circle of life and all organisms with the exception of autotrophs, eat other organisms its the way you survive. its over production and unnecessary slaoughtering and mistreatment of animals that you should stand against. not eating meat. thats just ignorant.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

The circle of life also includes animals that don't eat other animals. It is our choice as to what we decide to eat and how we behave toward other creatures. Animal rights also determine human rights. The act of killing gives a thumbs up that it is ok to commit acts of violence. Slaughter is the highest mistreatment of animals, it is a termination of their right to life.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

jerk the circle of life should mean the ripple effect of kindness and protection not slaughter and it generally applies to animals survival not the humans supposing to eat animals
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

You have a choice, you decide to not make that choice and you make excuses, therefore you are a hypocrite, an pretty ignorant one at that.Do you stand strongly on the side of animals when they are raised in terrible conditions, or do you stand strongly on the side of animals when they go to the slaughterhouse and are terrified? Or do you just say "so sorry" when you see a cuddly animal being mistreated and then claim you made a strong stand?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Lol idiot.. (can't call you cunt)..I ain't no animal lover. I love them.. just not THAT much. I do take a stand against it.. but I ain't no animal rights activist. I got more important priorities. Can't fight everybattle.Can't help it. Cunt.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

cool, i totally understand of course people have different priorities. i dunno why you called me a cunt of idiot. there distracting to any debate so please leave em out. Are you just telling me you have don't have enough time or strength to fight for what you think is right? a true man (or female) will fight every battle if they strongly support it, otherwise your a coward (or PUSSY - in you level of english).so just admit you are a pussy, coward, or just don't care enough for animals because that's the truth. small fuses for small brains.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Nah you see it ain't me to go out there to fight for peoples/animals rights. It's not what I do. It's nothing to do with pussines (thanks for making it easier for me to understand) I just don't care THAT much.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

YOU GOT MORE IMPORTANT PRIORITIES? MAYBE YOU SHOULD BUY A BOOK! WHAT ARE YOUR PRIORITIES? RUBBING YOUR NOSE? DO YOU READ HOW STUPID YOU LOOK?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

could your verbiage be anymore hillbilly ignorant? maybe a good education could do you some good. people eat people on some islands and in some countries. does that mean it's OK? buy a mind.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Your first priority should be learning to spell, grammar, etc. That and lack of swear words wouldn't make you look quite as dumb, even if you'd still be a few fries short of a happy meal
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

Of course, if one wants to protect animals, and they eat meat, then they are hypocrites of the highest kind.It is the whole thing of SAY ONE THING, DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

wearing leather or fur is just as bad so i hope some bring this up as well
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Would you kill or eat someone you love? I find the logic would apply everywhere, be it with humans and animals. I think it's because meat nowadays comes in packets or in supermarkets and people don't see the real animal. They find it hard to relate their food to the animals, and thus ignore the fact that they are eating the things they claim to love.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

I think it all depends upon the definition of "animal lover". If the definition means "all animals" and no exceptions then yes people who claim to love "all animals" and then eat meat would be considered hypocrites. If they admit they love only some animals and eat meat then they would not be hypocrites but they would also not be an "animal lover" if the definition is "all animals". Can someone both love an animal and eat it, in some sick way yes they can. See the farmer go to town, where he puts his cattle down, all they know they love and trust, till the day he eats them up. There is no such thing as honoring an animal in its death and there is no humane form of killing, it's all an act of violence.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

They by definition are hypocrites (a person who stands morally on one side and acts on the other). This is not a disputable point. So the argument is won.I would add, in their defense, they may just be ignorant and not know or understand that a person can indeed live off of a plant based diet alone. A diet that actually provides for greater health than just minimal animal intake.I'm a Vegan and I had wrestled with eating meat until 2 years ago, because I like many did not know their was another way.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Most of them don't love animals, they love pets. Or they consider cute household pets to be animals, while other animals are only considered food rather than animals. For example, most of these 'animal loving' meat-eaters would find the idea of eating a cat or dog completely abhorrent and inhumane.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Blame the way its presented

This is why China is such a great country...Here in the western world we see meat in shops and happy pigs and cows in pictures of farms. Children cannot make any link between the two whatsoever.In Asia you go to the store and buy meat like this:Customer:could I have a chicken wing pleaseButcher:sure(grabs a live chicken axes its head and removes the unordered parts of the animal)Customer:(who can see everything)thanksIt isn't exactly scripted like this but that is the basic idea.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

I've accidentally caught a glimpse of pictures and videos of China's food market and its atrocities to animals is beyond cruel. Nothing great about it. I couldn't watch it for more than a few seconds. Americans like neat pretty packages of meat so no guilt or remorse.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

Exactly my point, if you watch how companies such as McDonolds prepare their meat you'ld see that the level of cruelty is equal, if not more, to that of China. But America likes to hide their cruelty with pretty packeging whereas China admits it freely.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

IT'S ALL BAD! AND SO WHO DO WE VOTE FOR? ROMNEY AND HIS WIFE LAUGHED ABOUT MAKING THEIR DOG ILL FROM HIS CARRIER BEING TIED TO THE ROOF OF THEIR CAR FOR OVER 200 MILES! THEY HAD TO WATER HOSE THE ROOF AND DOG BEFORE TOUCHING IT BECAUSE IT WAS SO HOT. THE DOG WAS VERY ILL. OBAMA ATE DOG AS A TINY CHILD. BUT NOT NOW. BUT NEITHER REALLY CARE ABOUT ANIMAL RIGHTS REFORM. SO THEN WHO DOES ONE VOTE FOR? ROMNEY HAS NO CLUE ABOUT WORLD AFFAIRS LIKE OBAMA. SO THEN ISN'T IT BETTER TO VOTE IN OBAMA AND THEN FIGHT LIKE HELL FOR REFORM ON ANIMAL RIGHTS?
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

A GREAT COUNTRY? AS THEY THROW LIVE DOGS AND CATS INTO A BOILING POT OF WATER OR A FRYING PAN AFTER BURNING AND OR BEATING THEM SO THEY THINK THEY WILL HAVE GREATER SEXUAL SATISFACTION? WHAT COULD BE WORSE? IT'S ALL ON U TUBE
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

To start I am not sure what an animal lover even is, the idea always baffles me. What I do know is that paying someone to chop the head of a healthy animal for pleasure is as far removed from love as you can get. So to me its a absurd argument as its a bit like asking do peodophiles love children? which is of course not. Corpse munchers are a debasement to humanity and their only love is egocentric and deeply destructive to the integrity of humanity and the planet. Meat eating is antiquated cruel practice who's end is certain.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

How can you eat someone who has been ruthlessly murdered then claim to 'love' them? It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

They are! if you truly "love" animals you wouldn't eat themExample:Chinese people.No offence
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Before you hustle me off as a crazy, arrogant, poop-head, hear me out.What this argument boils down to is the hypocrisy of wholeheartedly defending killing animals yourself, whilst complaining about someone else killing animals. Yes, killing for survival is ethically more sound than killing for pleasure.BUT, in our current society (at least in the one I am familiar with, Australia), consumption of meat is for pleasure. As in, it's no longer: I need to eat this meat or I'll die.THEREFORE, if the VAST MAJORITY of modern society (based upon Australia) eat animals for pleasure. It is hypocritical to complain about Person A killing animals for self pleasure, whilst poo-pooing Person B killing animals for self pleasure.If you disagree with my above statement you either don't understand logic or you perceive animals in a hierarchy of deserving-to-die-ness (which in itself is hypocritical with deep set morals such as "Love thy neighbour" and "everybody is equal").There's of course exceptions (people who need to eat meat for anemia or what not), but before you rebuttal with little things like that. LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

Animal lovers who do not abort puppies in order to spare the mother from the pain of raising them and all the trouble they go through doing it are liars. They hate animals or they would kill all the puppies before they are born so the female dogs can enjoy themselves with no burden of puppies.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: Yes

In reality you don't need meat at all! People who says they are animal lovers and eat meat are mostly hypocrites because most people are eating meat, dairy and eggs. This process puts a lot of animals in pain all their life. Most people who eat meat don't kill the animals themselves. Only a small percentage kills animals themselves for them to eat for e.g. Hunters who need to eat meat because of the environment and circumstances. We are in an advanced generation where we can easily live of plant based foods. So when they eat meat they are simply supporting animal suffering. To eat thousands of chickens all your life is not very loving to animals especially when you don't need too!
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: No

It depends on in what sense they love animals. If they love playing with animals, think they're cute and cuddly, but don't believe they are beings with thoughts and feelings, just toys essentially, then they aren't hypocrites. Not saying they're right, but they aren't hypocrites. Also, some people don't have a choice about eating meat, like people in third world countries whose diets are very limited--they have to eat whatever they can to survive. Those people aren't hypocrites; they are just trying to survive. Now, people who view animals as people, essentially, but still eat meat and have a choice? They are hypocrites, of course.
Debate: Animal lovers who eat meat are hypocrits
Side: yes

A - Animal lovers are people who love animals on the same level as they love human beings.B - Vegetarian diets are cheaper not just to eat but also to produce. It depends on taxing/subsidies but in general in developing countries it is cheaper to be vegetarian.C - Those people would never be considered animal lovers. Not saying it's impossible.. just that it won't happen. They can't buy a designer suit for their dogs etc.