azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

I don't feel anything. It isn't "feel". What I know is that you are out of your way clearly to control and order other peoples responses, you need to stop being so bossy.I am really sorry that I try to keep you on topic. I know that it makes you feel terrible when ever you actually join in a conversation.That appears bossy, yet again.What the fuck does the word bossy mean to you? I only talked about what I was doing.An insult isn't really an answer to a question.When the question is "why don't you like me?" the answer is very likely to be insulting.I wanted to know whether you actually believed that it would harm society in general if stupid people were allowed to breed. It shouldn't really have anything to do with me posting on the internet.What was wrong with my answer of "no"?OK, you said that since I was only apparently trolling create I was not really causing anybody any physical harm even though you proposed I was an idiot?That fits in with my belief system. I have made it clear that I don't think that idiots definitely cause harm.Well, what if I was an idiot? How would you know that I haven't caused people harm in the real world? Whether not I or some idiot had harmed someone in real life has absolutely nothing to do with whether I have posted something somehow perceived as inflammatory on the internet.This conflicts with your overall argument. My argument is that we should treat people who are harmful as harmful. You want to treat idiots as harmful before finding out if they are harmful. If I can't determine how harmful you are from your intelligence in your posts, how can you determine if someone is harmful from answering questions in a test?Did you not say that I was not debating properly and I told you that I had merely asked you a question and you had told me that asking questions isn't debating?Correct, I did not say that. That isn't the series of events that took place. I have told you over and over that you aren't debating properly and none of that was ever during a conversation we had about you asking questions. You asked a question and I answered it in an accurate, but insulting way. The question was not related to the debate topic. It was not an argument, it was simply a question. I never said that there was anything wrong with asking that question. I said that since it was not part of the debate, my response can't be considered an ad hominem by definition. Keep asking questions, but don't ask anything you don't want to get the answer to (That's advice, not a rule I am forcing upon you).That's as far as I remember it.Not good for the guy who has admitted to a bad memory.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

I am really sorry that I try to keep you on topic. I know that it makes you feel terrible when ever you actually join in a conversation.How Cocky and Pedantic.What the fuck does the word bossy mean to you? I only talked about what I was doing.You seemed to be talking about what my responses should be. You're too critical.When the question is "why don't you like me?" the answer is very likely to be insulting.We're not talking about that question. We are talking about when I had asked you why I believe people with low IQ's should be sterilised. You clearly are spinning yourself up and confusing yourself.Spin right round in circles.What was wrong with my answer of "no"?That wasn't what you had said originally. Your hands in cookie jar as you say this.That fits in with my belief system. I have made it clear that I don't think that idiots definitely cause harm.You haven't really provided any evidence for your claim.This conflicts with your overall argument. My argument is that we should treat people who are harmful as harmful. You want to treat idiots as harmful before finding out if they are harmful. If I can't determine how harmful you are from your intelligence in your posts, how can you determine if someone is harmful from answering questions in a test?Yet again, you make it out like it's all about me. It isn't. It is about whether you think idiots in general are harmful in the real world."If I can't determine how harmful you are from your intelligence in your posts, how can you determine if someone is harmful from answering questions in a test?"You can determine how harmful someone is in the real world by reading their posts, but someone is incapable of being harmful on an internet forum, obviously.All I had said is that you had provided no evidence of how an idiot is harmful in the REAL WORLD. We aren't talking about online.Correct, I did not say that. That isn't the series of events that took place. I have told you over and over that you aren't debating properly and none of that was ever during a conversation we had about you asking questions. You had told me about a few times that I wasn't debating properly, but you have no validity to CRITICISE or INSIST that I am not, when I clearly am.(That's advice, not a rule I am forcing upon you).Insulting, Critising and Insisting upon something with Stern Language is not advice.You're insult about me being an idiot on a debating site being proof that idiots do not harm the real world is meaningless. You can only harm someone offline, not online.Invalid argument.If YOU don't have any evidence, just don't go down that root.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

You seemed to be talking about what my responses should be. You're too critical.I am too critical if you are right. But, as I pointed out, you were wrong. I was not talking about what your responses should be.We're not talking about that question.Great, another time you joined in on a conversation and didn't know what you were talking about.We are talking about when I had asked you why I believe people with low IQ's should be sterilised.Why were we talking about that? You asked the question and I fucking answered it. Why are you now complaining that I didn't answer your question? Did I answer the question earlier or not? You clearly are spinning yourself up and confusing yourself.No, stupid forgetful fucko, I am still the only one between us who actually knows what we are talking about.Spin right round in circles.You certainly do.That wasn't what you had said originally. Your hands in cookie jar as you say this.Then, how was I able to find this: blizzardbird(124) Disputed 1 pointAnyway, do you believe people with low IQ's ought to be sterilised?22hrs ago Side: Agree Cartman(12063) 1 pointNo. Even though I hate you, I don't think people like you should be sterilized.You haven't really provided any evidence for your claim.We have already established that it is ok to speculate and leave it at that. Me not providing evidence doesn't mean I said something that didn't fit in with what I said previously.Yet again, you make it out like it's all about me. It isn't. It is about whether you think idiots in general are harmful in the real world.I think that they aren't. Is it ok for me to talk about what I believe, or will you hold that against me?You can determine how harmful someone is in the real world by reading their posts, but someone is incapable of being harmful on an internet forum, obviously.Ok. I thought you were saying that you couldn't determine someone was harmful in real life.All I had said is that you had provided no evidence of how an idiot is harmful in the REAL WORLD. We aren't talking about online.Fuck you. That is of course not all you fucking said.You had told me about a few times that I wasn't debating properly, but you have no validity to CRITICISE or INSIST that I am not, when I clearly am.You clearly are not. You don't give a flying fuck about what is actually said.Insulting, Critising and Insisting upon something with Stern Language is not advice.Well, I wasn't being insulting, criticizing, or insisting anything, so it was advice. I didn't want you to think it was insulting, criticizing, or insisting because you like to project.You're insult about me being an idiot on a debating site being proof that idiots do not harm the real world is meaningless. You can only harm someone offline, not online.True. I didn't mean to imply that was any sort of proof. I was also making the assumption that you weren't harming anyone offline.If YOU don't have any evidence, just don't go down that root.Fuck you. I went down the same route you did.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Then, how was I able to find this:blizzardbird(124) Disputed 1 pointAnyway, do you believe people with low IQ's ought to be sterilised?22hrs ago Side: AgreeCartman(12063) 1 pointNo. Even though I hate you, I don't think people like you should be sterilized."No. Even though I hate you, I don't think people like you should be sterilized."That statement is exactly what's wrong. What would you think if somebody gave you a response like that?It just deflects from the topic.How do you know that I as a supposedly stupid person does not cause harm in the real world?Wait, we've actually discussed this already and you still don't get it...We have already established that it is ok to speculate and leave it at that. Me not providing evidence doesn't mean I said something that didn't fit in with what I said previouslyYou weren't speculating, speculating is adding your own imagination and thought to what is unknown. You were just throwing in two entirely irrelevant statements while trying to make them look relevant. No imagination involved. Nothing that involved proper thought. Just a cheap turn around and twist of words.I think that they aren't. Is it ok for me to talk about what I believe, or will you hold that against me?That's ok.Ok. I thought you were saying that you couldn't determine someone was harmful in real life.Oh, right, oh well.Well, I wasn't being insulting, criticizing, or insisting anything, so it was advice. I didn't want you to think it was insulting, criticizing, or insisting because you like to project.Whatever. Tiring and vain talk.True. I didn't mean to imply that was any sort of proof. I was also making the assumption that you weren't harming anyone offline.Obviously I don't go out of my way to be some anti-social revolutionary, but I like to be very direct with people in the real world and I never leave discussions till I feel it is solved and the other person understands why.Anyway, what evidence prior to me stating this did you have suggest that I did not cause fatal accidents in the real world?Fuck you. I went down the same route you did.Let's try to debate what constitutes intelligence.In what opinion what do you believe intelligence consists of?
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

That statement is exactly what's wrong. What would you think if somebody gave you a response like that?I would at least think they did answer the question.It just deflects from the topic.It didn't actually. LibProlifer chimed in and she took us off track.How do you know that I as a supposedly stupid person does not cause harm in the real world?I don't know. I assumed you would tell us if you were.Wait, we've actually discussed this already and you still don't get it...Doesn't this statement just deflect from the topic?You weren't speculating, speculating is adding your own imagination and thought to what is unknown. You were just throwing in two entirely irrelevant statements while trying to make them look relevant. No imagination involved. Nothing that involved proper thought. Just a cheap turn around and twist of words.So, you are admitting that you are a stubborn piece of shit that doesn't listen to what anyone else has to say. This is why people think you are an asshole. You claim you want a discussion, but you don't actually listen to what the other person said.Anyway, what evidence prior to me stating this did you have suggest that I did not cause fatal accidents in the real world?I have no evidence that you aren't a walking accident. Would you like to admit that you are a walking accident? It would help your argument.Let's try to debate what constitutes intelligence.In what opinion what do you believe intelligence consists of?I think intelligence involves how well the brain can handle information.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

I would at least think they did answer the questionWould you feel enlightened, or that any real progress has been made?It didn't actually. LibProlifer chimed in and she took us off trackLibProlifer just felt something was unfair and made one comment.It is both you and me who had decided to respond based on LibProlifer's comments.You have TrumpsHair on your side, remember?Doesn't this statement just deflect from the topic?Not really, I thought the statement was a bit late, actually.I don't know. I assumed you would tell us if you were.I have already.So, you are admitting that you are a stubborn piece of shit that doesn't listen to what anyone else has to say. This is why people think you are an asshole. You claim you want a discussion, but you don't actually listen to what the other person said.Any advice on how to change this "bad habit" of mine?Please, don't let it become just an insult.See my point?I think intelligence involves how well the brain can handle information.What determines how well the brain can handle information and what do you feel is the best way to test this?
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Would you feel enlightened, or that any real progress has been made?A little progress.LibProlifer just felt something was unfair and made one comment.And, since she was wrong, you should have ignored her.It is both you and me who had decided to respond based on LibProlifer's comments.No. I responded based on LibProlifer's comment, you responded to something else entirely. That's how we got off track.You have TrumpsHair on your side, remember?You don't want LibProlifer on your side. You should ignore her for your own benefit.I have already.You admitted to being a walking accident?Any advice on how to change this "bad habit" of mine?Yes. Stop pretending you know everything. Once you stop pretending to know everything, you will find out that other people know stuff. Once you find out that other people know stuff you just need to start listening to them.Please, don't let it become just an insult.Fortunately, it wasn't just an insult. You would know that if you actually read what I wrote.See my point?No. I didn't even know you attempted to make one.What determines how well the brain can handle information and what do you feel is the best way to test this?Handling information is seen with how well you respond to information given. I think IQ tests do a good job testing it. We would just need a couple extra tests for other things like verbal communication.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

A little progress.Most people wouldn't. It doesn't actually prove anything, nor does it provoke thought, therefore no progress has been made.And, since she was wrong, you should have ignored her.It's not your place to say she was wrong, nor is it your place to say that I should have ignored her.It's not your place to imply that she shouldn't have made that comment.By accusing her of being both in the wrong and derailing the conversation,you are implying that she should not have spoke up for what she believes.Yes, you said she was wrong and therefore in the wrong. Don't try any word games, don't try to be pedantic be with me.No. I responded based on LibProlifer's comment, you responded to something else entirely. That's how we got off track.You responded to LibProlifers comment, you made a comment to her and about her. Entirely.She merely spoke up for herself."you responded to something else entirely"Something else entirely other than Prolifers comment? I guess that includes the debate at hand. I don't recall adding anything to Prolifers statement if that is what you are implying. Key word, implying. I don't imply things like you do.And I have every right to comment in response to your comments.You don't want LibProlifer on your side. You should ignore her for your own benefit.I'll decide that.And show respect for HER, she's a female.Yes. Stop pretending you know everything. Once you stop pretending to know everything, you will find out that other people know stuff. Once you find out that other people know stuff you just need to start listening to them.Another excuse and another guilt trip. Rationalization, yet again.Gonna give me any advice on how to do all of this?Come on, then.Fortunately, it wasn't just an insult. You would know that if you actually read what I wrote.I know what an insult is. Insinuations and all that. Key word, imply.Rationalisations and excuses for saying things. I don't listen to that talk.No. I didn't even know you attempted to make one.You're clearly not a gentleman.Handling information is seen with how well you respond to information given. I think IQ tests do a good job testing it. We would just need a couple extra tests for other things like verbal communication.IQ tests do a reasonable job at testing verbal communication.IQ tests are to do with handling information? In other words that is to do with how well our brains connect together.IQ tests should be focused more on the core of testing our brain connections, rather than measuring how quick someone is verbally.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Yet there is no basis for this claim.The fact that it is true makes a pretty good basis.You didn't just say she was wrong, you said she shouldn't have made that comment.That was in response to you saying that whoever derailed us did something wrong. All I did was say she was wrong, and you attacked me for it.I condemned her? I don't remember that.You said whoever derailed us did something wrong.I didn't say that I was derailed nor led off track. My focus is completely in tact.You said the conversation was derailed. You are part of the conversation.What I said was that you trying to force your unrelated ideas on me was actually destroying the thread, derailing the thread from the main topic and disrupting it.And, since you are part of the thread it is derailing you. Plus, it wasn't me who did that.You have derailed the whole thread of course.No, LibProlifer did.Like you are now, by constantly nit-picking and accusing.I am explaining to someone who doesn't grasp reality what is actually going on.And I don't have to put up with such nonsense.At least I am not making up pure bullshit.That's your problem, not mine.The guy who uses the dictionary has the problem? Is this the Twilight Zone?I'll decide whether I was let off track, I will decide whether I think LibProlifer was intervening.Will you decide in a judging way?I'll decide if I found her offensive or if I saw her being offensive.You will judge if she was offensive?Don't try to turn me against her or anyone for that matter.It is more fun to turn you against yourself.I'll decide that for myself.Yes, but how long will you stick with the decision?I don't understand you.I know.Then just leave it as that.I don't care whether you think you come out as innocent or not.I don't care who you think started it.Let's clean up after ourselves.Stop nitpicking and accusing me.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

The fact that it is true makes a pretty good basis.That is something that you need to learn to communicate in a nicer way.That was in response to you saying that whoever derailed us did something wrong. All I did was say she was wrong, and you attacked me for it.I believe it was you who claimed she had done something wrong.You reproached her and told her that by simply making one comment she had derailed the entire discussion (another form of blaming). You said the conversation was derailed. You are part of the conversationI made a point about whole how the whole thread itself was being derailed by you.I said nothing about this little spatter that you had created.No, LibProlifer did.The Blame Game.Narcissistic on your part.Busted.I am explaining to someone who doesn't grasp reality what is actually going onRationalizations.At least I am not making up pure bullshit.Projection.Finger Pointing.The guy who uses the dictionary has the problem? Is this the Twilight Zone?Use it, then apply the dictionary correctly.Will you decide in a judging way?I'll make up my own mind, paddiewaddle.You may not like the answers but I'll still decide for myself.You will judge if she was offensive?I'm a witness aren't I?I didn't feel offended by it.And I know that I'm a compassionate person.It is more fun to turn you against yourself.Twisting.Mind Games.Deceitful Glee.Yes, but how long will you stick with the decision?I don't think that matters.I'll stick by anything as long as I believe I'm following my heart.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

That is something that you need to learn to communicate in a nicer way.Bullshit. Name one person on this website that you have listened to.I believe it was you who claimed she had done something wrong.I claimed she said something wrong. You claimed that whoever derailed the conversation did something wrong.You reproached her and told her that by simply making one comment she had derailed the entire discussionNo, I put most of the blame on you. But, since you are unable to blame yourself it would mean that she is solely responsible.I made a point about whole how the whole thread itself was being derailed by you.And you are wrong.I said nothing about this little spatter that you had created.This is all about what you created. We were just fine until you went off course.The Blame Game.Narcissistic on your part.Busted.You need to learn what the word means for it to really be a part of your vocabulary.Use it, then apply the dictionary correctly.I have and you still don't get it.I'll make up my own mind, paddiewaddle.You may not like the answers but I'll still decide for myself.Avoiding another question.I'm a witness aren't I?I didn't feel offended by it.And I know that I'm a compassionate person.Another unanswered question.Twisting.Mind Games.Deceitful Glee.Nope, nope, nope. Three strikes, you're out.I don't think that matters.I'll stick by anything as long as I believe I'm following my heart.It does matter because we have seen your heart change within a debate and you start defending a different position than you previously defended.