azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Yes they absolutely can. Why would you think otherwise? It's called theEmergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act of 1986 passed by our congress. This act guarantees medical "treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Medical_Treatment_and_Active_Labor_Act" Hooray! So when on of you Americans break a leg, a Doctor can stop the bleeding so that when you regain consciousness he can charge you thousands of dollars to get your leg fixed. "Do you see how completely uninformed you are. Do you just believe whatever is fed to you? Must be that peasant mindset you have. In civilized nations we like to use facts and evidence. "Please stop with this whole "civilised nation" bullshit. America is the country created the modern fast food resturaunt, an institution which encourages you to eat loads of food with your hands. Your 'inventions' mainly involve devices that make you lazier. The plastic culture which you enforce on the rest of Europe through your pathetic media is exactly the opposite of "civilised"."That sucks that you are having trouble with your reading comprehension. I never even mentioned the constitution at all, I mentioned the declaration of independence, and neither document guarantees income equality. It states that all men are created equal, not that all men are equal."That happens in every nation, all men are created equal. "I'm sorry you are so backwards.... I really am. The issue is freedom, not how hard you work. Hard word is not the worst thing that could happen to you, slavery actually is. In the U.S. we value our personal liberty, something you can't understand because you are sheep."You still have yet to justify, the horrendous amount of racism and inequality that happened in America, of which the guy was clearly infering to."I don't care if I was breaking rocks for 20 hours a day, that would be preferable to being someones property. (Probably not for you though because you are use to being the queens property)"Hooray, I'm apparently the Queens property, now state the document or law that states that, or does it not exist?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

So in an emergency you can get free medical treatment but in a non emergency situation you cant, in Britain healthcare is free emergency or not, all people have to pay for is prescriptions although if you have an ongoing medical condition or disability you get your prescriptions free. That is a hard fact.So the declaration says all men are created equal but not all men are equal is this meant to justify the non ethical treatment of the native American and non whites.You need to educate yourself about the world outside of US no one in Britain is the Queens property neither are we Peasants and you say people in Britain are Sheep, if you compared the amount of people in Britain and America who follow what their leaders say blindly, believing everything that has been spoon-fed to them by the Powers-That Be you would find more Sheep in America than the UK
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Please use periods.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_stopYou see it gets annoying when someone doesn't use periods no one knows where the idea ends and new idea should always have an ending don't you think that is so why don't you use them even though you know it's confusing when you think about it being a big problem it makes you wonder why more folks don't use periods more often than they do people know how to use them it would be a good idea but no one ever does have decent grammar any more run on sentences will make me crazy that really makes you think you think you could start using them now so that people understand?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"I'm glad you recognize our superior military power. Hooray is right, you probably wouldn't be alive without the American military. "I was being sarcastic."This isn't 20 questions nor is it history class. Look up your own information and make arguments based on the information you have. "Is it because you haven't won any wars on your own?"This isn't the America vs. China debate or the America vs. Japan debate. You created a debate called "America vs Britain". "I know, but it still disputes the fact that America doesn't own the world the same way Britain did. Britain actually had a war against China and won, we also had a war against Japan which we didn't win because some Englishmen had joined the other side."The United States absolutely owns this planet. We go into any nation we want and we call it whatever suits us: war, police action, occupation. No nation equals our military might. We are the lone superpower. "Ballshit, I've just disputed that with the fact that China and Japana are probably more powerful than you already. America isn't even a superpower. Whereas Britain was a hyperpower."We took 13 colonies of the best land on earth from your shitty little island."The 'best land on earth' at that time was India. America was just a 'bothersome little colony'. While the American rebellion was being fought, the politicians in Parliament were wondering whether to bother fighting it at all."I'm quite proud that my nation is not thousands of years old. I'm glad that we are a new nation that doesn't believe in barbaric notions of the past like royal bloodlines and kings and queens. I'm glad we are founded on modern concepts like democracy and human equality. "A country founded upon slavery, racism, classism and sexism can hardly be called a nation "founded on modern concepts like decomcracy and human equality"."I agree, we are monsters. That means don't fuck with us."What, like the Vietnamese didn't 'fuck with you'?"Your beliefs are absolutely disgusting. Slavery, indentured servitude, imperialism, murder, rape: this is what you are defending."Your mistaking the British Empire for another nation. When the British first endorsed slavery, it was because every other European Empire had done it as well. The only reason people in Britain put of with it so long is because they were taught that black people were 'evolutionarily inferior' and so were littler more than animals. Britain was one of the first empires to abolish slavery and the Royal Navy went around fleeing slaves from American slave ships. Britain industrialised most of their colonies, they brought free trade and the gold standard to many. They used their military to protect them and brought the longest era of world peace the world has ever seen.If these countries were not colonies of Britain they would have become colonies of France, Spain, Holland, Germany or Japan, who would have treated them much worse.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

But that's how it is, the United States owns this planet.This something I just could not leave be.It is completely wrong. We, humanity, do not own this planet. And you think a small portion of humanity does? We simply live on it alongside other life that we must consider. This planet is not just ours.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Okay hippy.I always forget to straighten out my chakras and cleanse myself of bad karma before I post here. Sorry about that. May mother Gia forgive my negative energy.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

So you really are an idiot. And you're from US. Good job keeping US's intelligence consistent. Oh yes, no matter what you do do not make your country look smart, that would be very foolish.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Oh yes, no matter what you do do not make your country look smart, that would be very foolish.Uh huh... What you wrote directly above is barely legible. I see you start right out with the lowest form of attack before you become unreadable. Is that the best you have by the way? If you are going to make a blatant ad hominum attack you should use a better word than "idiot". Are you so polite that you don't have any harsher words to call me than "idiot"?That's cute.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

...ad hominum...It's ad hominem.You are that stupid?What you wrote after my first argument is barely legible.Your response to my argument was exactly that, and I simply responded in kind. You can see everyone else but not yourself? That's narrow-minded in a rather stupid way.Check the definition of idiot. But you won't notice it applies to you, as you can't see yourself.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

.... alright.I guess I should take it easy on you because English is obviously not your first language. I don't have to look it up because I know what it means. We both know you just looked that up because you didn't remember what it meant and now you're hassling me about the spelling. Well, good work my friend. 1 point for you. You are absolutely correct. My spell check did not know 'hominem' and I have atrocious spelling. Can you type some more stuff now? It's really entertaining to read. Your writing style is so unique.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I did check it out just then, and what I noticed was your little misspelling. See, you're from US, your native language is English, meaning you should have known how it is written correctly, yet you did not. It's rather funny that I tend to notice mistakes in the writings of those whose native language is English, even though mine isn't. I know I make mistakes now and then but shit... how few I make compared to so many others who are native speakers.I didn't check it out because I forgot what it meant, I checked it because I did not previously know the meaning.Can you type some more stuff now? It's really entertaining to read. Your writing style is so unique.That good enough?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

That good enough?Yes thank you :) This exchange has been entertaining and your english is actually very good. I think you missed a comma and it made something confusing to read, that's what I said was not legible. But that was back when you were calling me an idiot and I was making fun of your hippy non-sense about the planet belonging to the animals or something. See, you're from US, your native language is English, meaning you should have known how it is written correctly, yet you did not. It's rather funny that I tend to notice mistakes in the writings of those whose native language is English, even though mine isn't. I know I make mistakes now and then but shit... how few I make compared to so many others who are native speakers.That would normally be the case, except that "ad hominem" is not english, it's latin. It is a neutral word because neither of us speak latin. (Most English speaking people don't know what "ad hominem" means either, outside of debating circles.)
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

But that was back when you were calling me an idiot and I was making fun of your hippy non-sense about the planet belonging to the animals or something.This is the idiot part.The planet belongs to every living organism that originates from here. Just because we have the ability to say it is only ours does not make it ours. But you went even farther - you said it belongs to the US - this is not just very stupid, but downright idiotic.Just because someone's military force is the strongest on the planet does not make only them own the planet.That would normally be the case, except that "ad hominem" is not english, it's latin.Its origin may be of Latin but it is used with English, and on this site I've seen it used rather much. English also has words that were originally French, also other words from Latin. Why are those words considered English and not French or Latin? Because they've been used so much with English that they became English?(Most English speaking people don't know what "ad hominem" means either, outside of debating circles.)Most people - sheeple - intellectually worthless.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Thank God for America - without which we would have lost the 2nd World War (some say we did anyway) They have always supported us and in return ask for us to say yes most of the time.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

They only joined WWII when Britain started to win. America's contribution to WWII was exaggerated afterwards so that Russia's contribution would get little credit.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

They didn't send any troops during the German invasion of France or during the Battle of Britain. The British had to fight for almost 3 years (1939 - 1942) alone.They first set foot in Europe in the summer of 1943 (it wasn't even in mainland, only in Sicily). By that time, the Soviets had gone through the worst and were starting to push the German army in the eastern front back; by that time Germany didn't have the potential anymore to achieve victory on the Eastern front (or in the war).D-Day has been dramatized a lot, but it wasn't that significant in the overall outcome of the war. By this time, the Soviets were already deep in eastern Europe and had reached Poland and Czechoslovakia. The Germans were pretty much already lost.If you look at military strengths and deaths, the Soviet Union had way more casualties, and also a way larger army. They also inflicted more German casualties. It is also worth mentioning that 80% of the entire German army was on the eastern front, leaving only 20% in the west.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

That's because they didn't want to go to war and they gave britain the suppiles to live and america was the reason we won in africa plus we were fighting on 3 fronts and america was in the great deppresion plus a lot of the amercan fleet was destroyed
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

forgetting the fact that it was the soviet union that did most of the work and were the ones who acctuly took down hitler in the 1945 invasion of berlin
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Dude, give it up. How many times are you going to debate America verus Britian.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Until your media stops portraying America as the greatest country in the world.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Your response to blind nationalism is blind nationalism? Two wrongs do not make a right. I would agree with you if you were asserting that all "my country is the best country" mentalities are bad, but you're just trying to refute "America is the best," with, "No, Britain is the best." It's trying to stamp out ignorance, pride, and arrogance with even more ignorance, pride, and arrogance, which is why I don't support your zealous, flag-waving patriotism; it's just as bad as the (admittedly disgusting) attitudes you criticize.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Fight fire with fire. What else are you suppose to do to end blind nationalism? Use reasonable structured arguments that are supported by facts and statistics?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Dude seriously, Chad is absolutely right. I am not a nationalist. I would never join the military or support this fucked up nation anymore than I have to. Nations are primitive in the big scope of things and I believe we humans will eventually grow out of this. But we'll have to completely grow out of the kings and queens, monarchy, superior bloodline bullshit first. What I am proud of is the American revolution and our revolt against the crown. I'm also proud of our actions during WW2, back when America had a little respect around the world. I might have joined the military back then. Axmeister has been trained to believe all these silly notions about the U.S. and I'm just educating him a bit. I don't see anything wrong with that. I don't think that necessarily makes me a nationalist.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Dude seriously, Chad is absolutely right."Of course he's right, I never said he was wrong."I am not a nationalist. I would never join the military or support this fucked up nation anymore than I have to. Nations are primitive in the big scope of things and I believe we humans will eventually grow out of this. But we'll have to completely grow out of the kings and queens, monarchy, superior bloodline bullshit first."What are you? some messed up anarchist?"What I am proud of is the American revolution and our revolt against the crown."Which was a stupid hypocritical act. You claim the American revolution was against the monarchy? Then why did you revolt against Britain, a constitutional monarchy with limited power, instead of Spain, an absolute monarchy who also owned more of North America?"I'm also proud of our actions during WW2, back when America had a little respect around the world."Because they like to join in wars late."Axmeister has been trained to believe all these silly notions about the U.S. and I'm just educating him a bit. I don't see anything wrong with that. I don't think that necessarily makes me a nationalist."I've never called you a nationalist, I think you'll find your patronising comment about educating me is, in reality, quite the reverse.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

"What I am proud of is the American revolution and our revolt against the crown."Which was a stupid hypocritical act. You claim the American revolution was against the monarchy? Then why did you revolt against Britain, a constitutional monarchy with limited power, instead of Spain, an absolute monarchy who also owned more of North America?Are you not aware that the 13 colonies that started the united states belonged to England, not Spain? Do you even know what revolt means? You can't revolt on another nation, guy. The Spanish ended up with some shitty desert we call Mexico. Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Are you not aware that the 13 colonies that started the united states belonged to England, not Spain? Do you even know what revolt means? You can't revolt on another nation, guy. The Spanish ended up with some shitty desert we call Mexico. Do you have any idea what you're talking about?"Then it clearly wasn't an act against Monarchies. Because there was no 'tryanny' of the Crown, because out of all the monarchs of Europe the British one had the most limited power.If your nation was so Anti-Monarchy, why did you ally with absolute monarchies against a constitutional monarchy with limited power?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Fighting fire with fire just results in more fire; it doesn't put the fire out. And yes. Instead of turning some chest-puffing idiots rantings into a dick-showing contest, subdue them with the facts.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I think if you'll look through the debate (escpecially the arguments of Judas and Nummi) I'm the one who's using the facts.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I have seen you use facts to beat down patriots before, that's why I don't understand why you still fall back on your own patriotism, sometimes.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Because I tend to become a dick when I realise I've got something right. Plus, I'm only a nationalist for the fun of it, if I met an American in real life, I probably wouldn't be as offensive to them as I am on here. Unless they were a nationalist...
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I guess part of the reason I have such distaste for nationalism is because overly-nationalistic Americans are partly responsible for Americas tarnished image abroad. It seems to me at least Americans have succeed in stereotyping themselves as people who think their country is the best and all other countries suck, which is a rightly contemptible attitude to hold. I feel the nationalists in this country are essentially contributing to giving America a bad name, so I've come to loath nationalism, regardless of which country it is in support of.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Lately, I've been trying to steer away from being too nationalistic, as I find it is an easy stepping stone up to racsim and other unsavoury ideals.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Whatever! Means that much to you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

We each have our own, I don't intrude your economic debates claiming that you should forget about the matter and stop going on about it.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

True, but it is never the same exact debate unlike your case.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

That's because there's a whole new bunch of Americans to crush every month.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Okay man, I guess whatever tickles your pickle. Have Fun. Go you.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Ok then. I don't see why your still in this debate.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

You think that's up to you? You think your little fussing on this small site will make a difference? And I thought Americans thought too much of themselves...
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

The same reason I fuss about America is the same reason you fuss over religion.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

You do understand that would mean America is nonsense, that it is a lie. And that is completely wrong. Americans do lie, they do think too much about themselves, but comparing it to religion is just stupid. A religion is a religion, a country is a country.A suggestion to you, stay away from debates that involve Britain and America and religion. You'll make yourself look much smarter that way.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I'm sorry, are you trying to drag religion into another one of my debates?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

A suggestion to you, stay away from debates that involve Britain and America and religion. You'll make yourself look much smarter that way.Should be obvious what I meant by it. But not to your deluded mind, of course.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I've no wish to debate with you. Not because I don't like you (that would be un-Christian of me). But because you have the inability to write arguments without insulting the other party. If you want to debate on your terms, then make your own debate. Until then, you either come up with a reason why America could possibly be greater than Britain, or you go away.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

But because you have the inability to write arguments without insulting the other party.This I actually laughed at. You begin with insults. I have simply observed your idiotic and deluded arguments and made the according conclusion - that you are delusional and quite frankly stupid. It is not an insult, in case you don't have the capacity to understand.If you want to debate on your terms, then make your own debate.Really? That stupid? Debating is about giving your opinion on a subject, that is the only fucking rule there is.Until then, you either come up with a reason why America could possibly be greater than Britain, or you go away.Or perhaps you should pull your head out of your shit-hole and look at the outside world?USA has the strongest military, this basically decides the "greatness". Music, movies, games, books, science and technology (even though on average they are quite stupid). Facts are facts and reality is reality, but you, of course, only care about your deluded opinions and beliefs.If you have no wish to debate me then why did you respond in the first place?