Debate: Is PS3 better than Xbox 360
Side: PS3 is better

Who uses the console to watch movies or surf the web? Why don't you then say "Who actually uses computer's to play video games?". See the irony?Multiplayer isn't more challenging on either. 360 has a bigger community, as well as a lot more people devoted to not having a life. Plus, yeah I can see how there is a challenge. You have to deal with modders (we don't, PS3 is unhackable). Graphic quality: You apparently didn't read the comment one or two above your own. Most games up until lately, have been developed ON the 360 and THEN ported to the PS3. Seeing as how the cell processor is set up way differently than standard multi-core's, can you not understand WHY the graphic content has been better? Also, how's this for a turn around. You know Crysis 2? A game made by Crytek, using CryEngine 3. One of the leads even stated that so far, the game engine has performed and looked better on the PS3, not the 360. That's because Crytek came into the console devving game late. Meaning they took their time with both consoles, and got to know how each are set up.The PS3 equipped with a cell will outperform any 360 in processing and rendering. The Cell is made of a PPE and 8 SPE's. One of the SPE's is there in case any of the others should fail. The other seven are managed by the PPE. It gives each of them tasks, and tracks the work they've done, are doing, and need to do. In this way, it processes the data simultaneously, performing essentially 3 times more efficient than the Xenon in the 360. A game developed perfectly on the cell, and on the xenon, will perform and look better on the PS3. Anyday. No matter what. It's a fact. If you care to dispute this, take your "evidence" which you didn't account the port factor into, to IBM and SONY, and see what they have to say. Beside's X86 is going to be a thing of the past. Just as well, you do realise Blu-ray is the future. Dual layer HD DVD's can only hold a maximum of 30 gigs, where as Blu-ray can hold 50 gigs. Meaning no need for multiple disc's for us to play huge games. Just as well, Blu-ray is owned by Sony. So, even when the NEXT consoles come out, Microsoft won't have Blu-ray. So enjoy buying a 200 dollar blu-ray player eventually, while we keep watching true high definition on our freakin game console. The PS3 can outperform the 360 in frames as well. Once again, take into account that A. InfinityWard/Activision have a DEAL WITH MICROSOFT. This is why DLC is available earlier on Microsoft. B. The GAME IS MADE ON PC/360 THEN PORTED TO PS3. Meaning, a game they devoted to development on a certain platform, is then shambly ported over to our platform, which utilizes a still practically brand new architecture. So, when you are proficient in at least objective C scripting, maybe you won't be testing without software. Maybe you will also first do some research, before coming here and making fanboy claims. If you are a gamer, whichever console has the games you prefer is the way to go. Technologically speaking, your system, as well as any Windows computer, will never be able to outperform cell/BE equipped supercomputers or servers. Just like your system can't outperform our's. IBM's top line of super computers and servers are now cell/be. So please, go tell them that they are wrong to do this. Apparently you have more education than them.