azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: I don't care I'm anti-social

Compared to what?I would think if one were to take the time to call or visit, socially that would be more beneficial.If you are insinuating it maintains relations with one you would not call, yes.If you only speak on facebook instead of meeting in person or calling, than no.I don't care either way. I'm anti-social.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

No it is not. Because when you don't see the person face to face, you will easily misunderstand the person's tone or intentions. When you are in a bad mood, and that someone talks to you, you will get angry easily because your mind just think that you are talking to a computer, not your friend thus starting arguments easily.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

Social networking allow many strangers to invade our privacy. The people we know online may not be the people who we thought they actually are. Infact, they may be hiding their identity to get to know more 'friends' online. By hiding their identity, there are so many things which they can do that we do not know.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

I feel that it is harder to mantain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook as i feel that on social websites, you might make friends who you do not know. You can also easily misunderstand the other person's tone and end you misunderstanding each other. Meeting face to face can make each other know each other actions and tone easier.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

I've seen many a relationship fall apart over social networking websites. Of course it depends on the couple in question; I personally have seen more over internet relationships fall apart than real world relationships.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

•Rather, impressions are formed based only on the information presented . Some people are more comfortable with this paradigm as it avoids the discomfort of public speaking. •Communication via written media may lead people to take more time to think through their ideas since their words are in a more permanent setting (online) than most conversations carried on during face-to-face conversations
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

First we have to look at what a 'good relationship' is and how it can be achieved, and then if social networking can aid the achievement.What is a good relationship? This is quite disputable, but logic deduces that a good relationship consists of two aspects:TrustEmotionNow, how can these aspects be achieved?Trust: Through inter-active conversations and face-to-face discussions.Emotion: Intimacy with a person, eye contact and other types of body language.Now, do social networking sites provide face-to-face interaction and intimacy? NO because there is no actual human contact online and sharing feelings with a computer screen is very different to real communication.Therefore, a good relationship cannot be maintained via social networking sites.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

yea no. long distance relationship never works. even on facebook, u cant hold the person :/
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

good relationships are built on trust,honesty and gud understanding of one another!an interaction can be initiated online but nothing is as helpful as an one to one interaction with people!time constraint in meeting new people is der but the time spent online can be reduced and replaced with live interactions !it always make a difference to say a"happy bday" to anyone with a real smile rather than a smiley!and adding to it smileys dont convey all you want to xpress ,at times not in the rigt sense!
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

Facebook is just a "social networking site" if you put it nicely, it is just a site to poke,poke and......poke!It is like a spy droid to spy on your friend's every move!
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

I suppose that we are not avle to ave a good relationships in social networking sites because first of all we do not see this person in real life. In my experience, I can say that I do not have a lot of friends but I do not even need in it. The most important thing for me that I have known them for a long time and all my friendships has been created for 11 or 9 years. That is why how I can have a good relatinships with other people if I even have never seen him/her. What about me I can add that I use Facebook to comunicate with my friend who lives in Canada. I have known her since my childhood that is why I can say that perhaps in this case I can propose a good relationships but for me it is like a little exception.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

this question, “How has online social networking influenced your relationships with friends and family?”was asked to me by one my teacher.i told, “The teenage way of life has completely changed from what it was only twenty years ago. Now, there is a dramatic decrease in face-to-face communication, which reduces our generation’s ability to interact with others on a speaking level.”We get so much attracted to it because we like the attention we are getting from our friends or any another close person but at that time we don't realize that we are wasting our time.we get so distracted and we do not give any importance to our studies which leads to getting less marks.
Debate: It is easier to maintain good relationships in social networking sites such as Facebook.
Side: No

When you are online, it is hard to solve fights or arguments because of one, people commenting on comments thus adding fuel to the fire, and two, you won't apologise online as your pride is important because it will be shown to the public or friends.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

I have actually seen some computer stores advertise: We Uninstall Windows Vista That has to count for something!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: windows xp

Yeah! They say "Due to high demand, we have uninstall Windows XP. We did this for one thing... We want to please our customers..." HaHaHa!!!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Tried, tested and proven to give the energizer bunny a run for its money. Like an old sweater, its comfy, you know its flaws, driver support is great and all that lovely software just works.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

No disagreement here. At least you know what works well, what doesn't, and there's tons of support on the Internet for it in case you do run in to any snafus. Other than that, it's just standard CTRL->ALT->DEL for any other issues you run in to.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Windows XP. Everyone knows how to use it already and is used to it. It runs all the latest games, has tons of programs for it, and is good for all kinds of office use because everyone knows how to get it to work.Dell keeps selling XP because people want it. At the moment, it's got the comfort of something you know and trust, and if it doesn't work for some reason, most people know how to fix it.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

XP is a huge improvement in functionality over Vista.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Vista is a big blob of uselessness. I can have all the extra functionality and security on XP with free 3rd party applications for a fraction of the ressources. Vista may not be too terribly bad, but if someone offers you a 40" LCD TV or a 40" CRT TV for the same price, why would you pick the CRT?
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

I pick the CRT. Nevermind, I forgot, I'm not an Ass Hat.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

I just spent hours trying to fix someone's computer that had Vista. The network is messed up and everytime you open a program it show s a dll error. My resolution to them was: Uninstall Windows Vista, and install XP, and all your problems will go away.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Get Vista now and after a year Microsoft is gonna come out with a Vista SuperUltraUltimate Edition that will completely dump today's Windows Vista... and your money down the drain. Har! Har!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Eventually Vista will grow into something good, but as of right now the truth is that I would rather use XP any day. It really isn't a big deal to me how my GUI looks, so that takes away basically the biggest advantage that Vista has over XP. DirectX 10 should be a big asset, but its lackluster performance so far says otherwise. The fact is, Vista doesn't bring a whole lot of new features to the table and still manages to bog down my system, especially in games that ran fine in XP. Not to mention driver issues left and right. Once a service pack comes out, then I'll switch fully. Only one of the four computers in the house uses Vista, and needless to say it sees the least action out of the four. If I could play Crysis on Very High without changing cvars in XP then I'd do it, but it's just not worth the hassle to me for a few more frames. I guess that's what it really comes down to: Vista offers too few features for too much hassle.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

I use my computer for gaming. I worked all summer last year so I could build a tank of a gaming rig, and the one thing that stops my computer cold is Vista. Worst mistake of last year, period. I was swept up in the marketing campaign of it and thinking 'Oh Vista is the new kid on the block, it has all these pretty features and it's DX10 compatible, I am going to rock Crysis on this so hard!'It disappoints me on medium! And for some unknown and unresolved issue, I can not play anything with the source engine without the screen turning into a blender effect. Which by the way is TF2, CS:S, HL2, and Portal. Oh and the next best thing since Dead Rising, Left 4 Dead! Vista takes my quad-core, 8800 GTX, Twin Raptor hard drive, X-Fi rig and makes it it's bitch. Utter failure, I'm switching back to XP before they stop selling it.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Ok, all of you Microsoft execs, you 24 know who you are, should not be allowed to vote in this debate.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Idealy, I'd run a linux machine and stip all that copyright protection out of my machine, but alas, I am not teh 1337, and hence prefer XP simply because it isnt as bloated as vista with all the copyright checking and new media formats and such.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Because Vista looks like it has been developed by my grand mother.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Actually, if I had my way I'd still be using 2000. But of the two options mentioned here, XP is relatively more stable. You can stop laughing now, I said "relatively"!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: windows xp

Vista is so slow i had but i changed back to XP
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: windows xp

Windows XP !!It's better in terms of speed if both of them are brought up side-by-side.Although Windows vista looks better, XP is still the bestPeople like XP more than vista because vista is very faulty.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: windows xp

I believe Windows XP is better than Windows Vista. One reason is that Windows tries to improve their computers by trying to make it more convenient than the older version. However, many people are used to Windows XP, and everything is simple and easy to use and understand. As the computers got more advanced, some things got harder to understand. In Windows 7 (Which I am using right now), did not have Windows Movie Maker, which millions of Youtube users depend on. I tried downloading a Windows 7 compatible Movie Maker, but I couldn't understand any of it. I had to download an older version of Movie Maker. I know I am mentioning Windows 7, but this is just an example that Windows is taking out programs and making things difficult. Therefore, I believe that Windows XP is better than Windows Vista.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Windows Vista is to Windows XP as Windows ME was to Windows 98. Why try to fix something that isn't broken?
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

My programs run so much faster on XP. I'm a designer/programmer and a publisher for a magazine, so I have all CS3 programs running at all times. Vista seems to always snag up.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

She's the new girl on the block. Designed to stand up to OS X and not have to blush. Shes carrying a few extra pounds of weight but under the hood theres a lot more going on. Can she go the distance with less than sterling driver support, surely good looks, more features and future proofing are enough?
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Operating systems are not like people... you don't hate on Vista because it's new, rather because it's bloated, too flashy, and doesn't have any useful features. There is no reason to upgrade.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

Wow, I always though of Windows Vista as bloated but now I'm starting to think about it as voluptuous!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

Beauty is in the eye of the "beerholder" as they say. Or at least you'd have to have a bit of a buzz to think that Vista is beautiful. I think I'd more closely describe Vista as a "block or more". You know, something that looks good from a block or more away. Once you get under the hood and start seeing all the issues that Vista has you'll realize you're better going on with XP at least until Microsoft releases a Service Pack.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

XP had so many problems it's hard to say that anything Microsoft pumped out would ever be such a problem. People have always been reluctant to change, there's still plenty running NT or even 98. Or would be if there was any support for them. The point is that while Vista still has plenty of problems it is a vast improvement over XP. I'd much rather have had the improvements without the bloated feeling that comes with running an OS that requires 1GB of RAM to even think about running well.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

I'm pretty much on-board with what you're saying pvtNobody but (and there is always a but right? heh) with the money and time Microsoft have had to not only ship Vista but roll out a service pack too. Should there really be any bloat at all? I probably err more on the side of not minding it uses more resources when under the hood there is clearly more going on but then you see something like ubuntu with all its whizz bang graphical effects using compiz and a solid set of features running within a much smaller resource footprint, you have to wonder.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

Definitely Vista uses an enormous amount of memory and if I had to choose between Vista and Ubuntu I'd probably choose Ubuntu for most applications. Vista has, as far as I can tell, fewer overall flaws than XP, At least as far as my experience goes, and that was the topic of the debate.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

Superfetch rocks my socks off.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: windows vista

I have windows vista home premium and never have problems... I guess depends and how much you run in the background and some junk that comes with the new PC. Other than that Vista is very responsive and stable here. Now I have to say something I don't like is the Explorer toolbar, I hate that cd burning Icon there and the inability to modify it. So I miss that from XP.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: windows vista

vista is far better it is really fast and it's really sexy!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

Windows Vista actually wasn't that bad. The main problem was that computer manufactures would not put the required amount of ram for the OS to even run properly. Microsoft did release updates that fixed some of the problems of Vista but by that time most people had gotten rid of Vista. I had a Toshiba laptop that ran on Vista and I never had any problems with it. I also have a Gateway desktop and I haven't had any problems with it either.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

People should fall over themselves to install Vista on older machines. They'll have near death experiences with rage then see the light and install Ubuntu!
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows XP

Really Ubuntu isn't that great. There are distros that are just as good and there should be something wrong when Linux is synonymous with a single distro for most people. One of Linux's selling points, for me at least, has always been its variety.
Debate: Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Side: Windows Vista

Of the many distros I've tried it's the best all things considered. Additionally, I like the cut of their sponsor's (Canonical) gib.Also, even if there were only one distribution of the Linux operating system, it's the open source aspect that prevents it from ever becoming as constricting as closed products. Of course there will always be many distributions exactly because it is open.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

They are both good in platform, but iOS is not that much friendly like Android, regardless of version they have. and for Android mobile like in Samsung they are easy thing to have, they can have custom phone cases the way you want, not as always with iPhone.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

I prefer Android. Apple seems to limit the software it's devices can run to their own productions. A lack of Flash instantly kills it for me; it's a huge part of digital media. iTunes is also a big problem. I find it to be a slow and clunky program, and at one point all of my music was deleted. On top of that, Apple products are ridiculously expensive and far too poor of quality to justify it. I don't really care about brand names, but the stuff really just has to work, and I have had zero problems with my android phone thus far, while iTunes and the iPod touch made me suffer occasionally.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

iphones are only $200 on Contract. Please elaborate on how iphones are "poor quality"
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

Never singled out iPhones, just Apple products I've seen in my own experience. I've simply had more trouble with Apple than I've ever had with Android. I did, however, own an iPod touch, and noticed how cheap the screen was, along with plenty of system crashes. I only dropped it maybe twice before the screen started popping out, while in comparison to my HTC phone, which my butterfingers have lost hold of a dozen times at least, which has zero damage. I've also seen iPads with lag issues just from dragging the screen before; completely new ones. But, in short, I have next to no experience with iPhones. Weren't they much, much more expensive that that at initial release, though? I seem to remember a new iPhone model costed around $600 at one time or another.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

If apple products are so cheap, please tell me why apple is almost dominating the market revenue?
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Same way a dollar store makes any money. It's just as much about a business model as it is the product.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

And people buy from them because they like them and are happy with them. Have you seen how many teens have iphones now?
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Plenty of people are happy with their toothbrushes, too. I know I am. Look, I don't give a shit about brands. If people like them they can buy them. I'm just saying I think Android is better, based on my own experiences. I do NOT care about Apple's business policy, their products just don't work for me. I also see just as many HTC phones as iPhones, though that's likely just locally. Either way, not the point of my debate. And if this is going to become some sort of fanboy argument, let me know now so I can avoid it, please.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

Teens are not the brightest people on the planet ;)
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Adults are worse. but i understand, Haters gonna Hate. Yr All just Android fanboys
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Adults are the ones who created the Apple (and Android) products, not teens. This makes the adults smarter than the teens ;)
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

Thats because Adults Don't give teens the chance to work in such environments.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

? what about that kid that created angry birds? ;)
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

Why do you keep putting a wink face? seems kinda creepy Bro.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

"This makes adults smarter than teens ;) " You just saying this proves there are some exceptions. You know, this may be because adults have had more time on this earth to learn things, and are somewhat more experienced than teens. And ;)? Now you're making yourself sound proud of this. Ever occur to you that 1. You used to be a teen, and probably thought the opposite of what you have said, and 2. All the current teens of this world will soon be adults? No, of course not.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Actually i am a teen. And the way most adults function towards teens is stupid. Y'all want us to act like adults but treat us like kids.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Yes, i myself am a teen! i wasn't going against you, i was going against the guy who was dissing us! i know this is a debating thing, but you're right 'Tim'
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Oh OK(: Its all good! that guy is just a hater lol. but i hope hes happy hes an adult, it must give him so much confidence. lol
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

This poor lonely guy, having to resort to insult teenagers, who are in fact cleverer than him..! ahahahhahahahaha! Mr.Hater, i think you've lost this debate!
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Yeah, and you are just an Apple fanboy. That must give you confidence.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

Because Apple fan boys will pay top dollar for pretty, pretty, bling, bling..., regardless of quality ;)
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

First of all Apple products are not almost domination the market revenue. In total, on computers, Microsoft Windows is sold at a rate of almost 50:1 compared to Mac OS. Second of all, in the mobile area, iphone sales have been dropping like Disney's stock slide.
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

iOS is crap ;)
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

I beg to differ, but Plase Explain how. Or r u just an android fan boy?
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: ios

1. I hate iTunes with a passion that is unrivaled.2. I don't like being told that I cannot use MY device any way I want. If I want to run flash, there better be a way to do so.3. I don't like paying inflated, uncompetitive prices for disposable hardware.4. There ought to be a way to upgrade your hardware without having it become obsolete soon after purchase.5. I don't like artificial barriers put in place for the sole purpose of extracting more money from me.Need I go on? ;)
Debate: ios 5 vs Android 4.0
Side: Android

Don't forget about the unstableness of Android. But whats so bad about itunes?