azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"This I actually laughed at. You begin with insults."I can look at every single one of your arguments and find indirect insults in every paragraph and direct insults several times. Please explain how you can claim I'm the one who insults you, have I insulted you once in this debate?"I have simply observed your idiotic and deluded arguments and made the according conclusion - that you are delusional and quite frankly stupid. It is not an insult, in case you don't have the capacity to understand."Calling someone idiotic, delusional and stupid are insults. What's worse is you use these insults as 'evidence'to support your arguments and attmpt to dispute mine."Really? That stupid? Debating is about giving your opinion on a subject, that is the only fucking rule there is."And the subject is America vs Britain."Or perhaps you should pull your head out of your shit-hole and look at the outside world?"Come up with something new, you recycle your insults over and over again. It makes your arguments quite borng and repetative."USA has the strongest military, this basically decides the "greatness"."Yet they haven't won a single war on their own."Music, movies, games, books, science and technology (even though on average they are quite stupid)."100% opinion, you have no evidence for this, because there isn't a measurement for how great a nation's culture is.""Facts are facts and reality is reality, but you, of course, only care about your deluded opinions and beliefs."I've heard this so many times, seriously if you can't come up with a serious point on this debate, I'm just going to ban you."If you have no wish to debate me then why did you respond in the first place?"*Because you entered my debate.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

I can look at every single one of your arguments and find indirect insults in every paragraph and direct insults several times.Then go ahead and provide me those paragraphs and become proved wrong.Please explain how you can claim I'm the one who insults you, have I insulted you once in this debate?You have, and I actually do not care about you as much as to go and fetch them. I've got better things to do with my time.Calling someone idiotic, delusional and stupid are insults.Depends on context. And the context I used them in is simply a reflection of reality, not an insult."It is not an insult, in case you don't have the capacity to understand." I guess I was right about that, you really do not have the capacity to understand.And the subject is America vs Britain.This is your response? Very stupid, again...You said, "If you want to debate on your terms, then make your own debate."Then I said, "Really? That stupid? Debating is about giving your opinion on a subject, that is the only fucking rule there is."Then your answer is, "And the subject is America vs Britain." Where is the bold in this quote? If it was a follow-up from the previous it should have one, yet does not. You avoided the issue, you did not give a legitimate reply.Can you really not see how stupid you are being?Come up with something new, you recycle your insults over and over again. It makes your arguments quite borng and repetative.Then perhaps you should start coming up with some new topics? Then perhaps you should begin debating new subjects? Then perhaps you should pull your head out of your shit-hole already? America vs Britain and religion... stay away from those 'cause you really are incapable of debating on them with any substance.You should really look over your own arguments as there is nothing new compared to your older ones. The same crap over and over. Because you are deluded and stupid and above all else wrong.Yet they haven't won a single war on their own.You clearly don't understand how things work, globally. Educate yourself, then come back. Otherwise you'll just provide worthless crap.100% opinion, you have no evidence for this, because there isn't a measurement for how great a nation's culture is.That was 100% biased response. Literally.I've heard this so many times, seriously if you can't come up with a serious point on this debate, I'm just going to ban you.That would only prove me right and you wrong. It would show you are unable to accept reality and so adhere to your idiotic delusions. You don't even want to hear about reality, the truth. You are so stupid and mentally just fucked up. You need professional help, I'm sure I've said it to you before. So far you have not proved me wrong. Go get some help.You can't refute me, you cannot provide anything but insignificant crap, then you get bored or see that there is no way you can nonsense me to submission, and then you simply go for banning. Nice... strategy, but ineffective and so very stupid.Because you entered my debate.If I see something so stupid then of course I will say something.You could simply not reply, you know.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Then go ahead and provide me those paragraphs and become proved wrong."Considering how you don't understand what an insult actually is, I'm afraid I can't do that to you at the moment."You have, and I actually do not care about you as much as to go and fetch them. I've got better things to do with my time."So you demand that I go fetch your offensive arguiments, but you can't do the same for me? Because you have 'better things to do with your time' in backwards Estonia?"Depends on context. And the context I used them in is simply a reflection of reality, not an insult."It is not an insult, in case you don't have the capacity to understand." I guess I was right about that, you really do not have the capacity to understand."Please don't bore me with crap.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Not because I don't like you (that would be un-Christian of me)It's not "un-christian" to not like someone. Christ himself hated the rich, the romans, gamblers and merchants, and pretty much anyone that was not a jew. I remember a verse where Christ is calling gentiles dogs. I can provide it for you if you wish.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I've no wish to debate religion here, let's keep this nationalistic.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Sure we can talk more about Christ. Thanks for bringing him into this debate. I have that verse right here for you.Matthew 15, 25-2625 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.Seems like if you're a gentile you're a dog and not worthy of Christ's help. Sucks to not be a jew huh. Maybe you should make a new debate about it. I'll meet you there.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

By the way, you dragged it into your debates, not me.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I didn't drag religion into question, I brought your relationship with religion into the debate as a way of helping you understand why I make debates about America.Clearly you missed the point.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

??? Yes you did drag it into here.All I did was give you a suggestion, that's all. How hard can that be to understand?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Did you even read my argument? Because all I can see is a repetition of the argument I just disputed.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Pull your head out of your shit-hole. Seriously, you are so blind to reality. Although your shit-hole is real, it prevents you from seeing the rest of the world and so you make things up.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Sorry old chum, when I went to click Dispute my hand slipped and I 'accidently' clicked Ban.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

The united states is powerful, but so is great britan. Each is good, each is equal.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

but india in all subjects is bigger,better and ba.... than great britain!!!!!!
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

O say can you see by the dawn's early light,What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming,Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight,O'er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there;O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave,O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Is that all you got for America? A poem that was probably a form of propaganda?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

God save our gracious Queen!Long live our noble Queen!God save the Queen!Send her victorious,Happy and glorious,Long to reign over us:God save The Queen!Yes, but the argument works both ways.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

I'm not using my national anthem to support why my country is better than yours.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Oh so you chose not to:USA - 1Britain - 0I don't have a problem with you picking favourites between the two once great nations. The US is more powerful right now albeit losing its hegemony. Sure, they have commited atrocities but so did Britain during its hegemonial period. I would choose the US over Britain any time from a historical or moral perspective. Enjoy your monarchy by the way.On the other hand you have great handouts and health care, even Romanians are cashing in on your social security. Enjoy following US policy politely with the rest of the Europeann Union.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

How is Britain following any US policy? I think you'll find you Americans are following our polcies.Obamacare=NHS.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

I am mainly talking about foreing policy. Don't pretend the EU is being critical of the US. Their leaders follow along politely. The welfare state is a very american idea, it was supported by Franklin D. Roosevelt. The administration affected many constitutions around the world to include universal health care. Europe followed the ideal set by him.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

I feel sorry for the queen ;)
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Because all Americans are so educated in global affairs:http://www.protias.com/Pictures/Fail/fail%20miss%20america.jpg http://www.demotivationalposters.org/image/demotivational-poster/0806/fail-fail-idiot-south-america-austrailia-demotivational-poster-1214210681.jpg http://www.dumbwire.com/funny/plog-content/thumbs/stupid/more-stupid/large/4673-americans-are-stupid-america-stupid-funny-lol-fail-demotivational-poster-1226921054.jpg http://cdn.motinetwork.net/demotivationalposters.net/image/demotivational-poster/0806/fail-fail-demotivational-poster-1214434592.jpg
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Dude!!!! I've measured the moon. It's not as big as an elephant. Trust me on this one ;)
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

'Merica. ;)The “rebels” were able to kick the British military square in the ass. though they were small and had help; they were able to stand up for their cause and still win.Britannia was cool too but they didn't win. :(
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Please don't delude yourself, the American revolution was a war between the American loyalists and the rebels. Britain did support the loyalists but the rebels recieved a huge amount of help from the Spanish, French and Dutch Empires. If those other empires hadn't got involved then Britain could have won the war easily.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

In my view, US is the country which lead the another countries. US is like foundation for our world. I think, America has a huge influences for economics of the world,enviroment etc.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

How many countries did the US create? The US doesn't even have a Commonwealth, how can you say it has influence over other countries?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

India 2020 British 0000 and America 0000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

We won our independence from them already. We have advanced further than they have. We have achieved power that they cannot. America is just too much for Great Britain to handle. If Britain ever wanted to compare itself to America then sure we have our faults but we are a baby nation. We are new and yet the strongest and therefore we shall not be taken down by Great Britain.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

Please provide facts and statistics to support such outrageous claims.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

Well first we broke free from Great Britain. Remember that in 1782? Britain was very strong and i have to admit that, but we eventually overcame British influence in our lives after the cruel taxes they had placed on us. Remember the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Tea Act? How they taxed all our paper goods and tried to use Americans to help out the British East India Company by lowering the tax on tea thinking that we would start buying from them? That's messed up, but in America you can pursue happiness in any way. There will be a group of people there to mock you, there will also be a group of people willing to welcome you in. And most people won't care at all for they know it's my right to do just about whatever. If I were to go to a British audience and tell them I’d found happiness through Call of Duty or The Hunger Games or Yoga Pants I'm pretty positive I’d be greeted by rejection and eye rolling from all the citizens in Britain. Now Britain was very powerful and yet still is but in modern times America has out done it's parent country in just a span of about 300-400 years.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"Britain was very strong and i have to admit that, but we eventually overcame British influence in our lives after the cruel taxes they had placed on us. Remember the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Tea Act?"The Stamp Act was repealed after the British colonists complained, and the Tea Act was actually extremely fair. The tea tax in the American colonies was one of the lowest in all of the British Empire, the only reason people view it as unfair was because smugglers created propaganda since the tea tax made them lose out on illegally smuggled tea." How they taxed all our paper goods and tried to use Americans to help out the British East India Company by lowering the tax on tea thinking that we would start buying from them? "There is nothing wrong with the Government encouraging it's population to buy a certain good by making it cheaper."That's messed up, but in America you can pursue happiness in any way."Unless you were poor, black, female or foreign."There will be a group of people there to mock you, there will also be a group of people willing to welcome you in. And most people won't care at all for they know it's my right to do just about whatever. If I were to go to a British audience and tell them I’d found happiness through Call of Duty or The Hunger Games or Yoga Pants I'm pretty positive I’d be greeted by rejection and eye rolling from all the citizens in Britain."This is merely incorrect generalisation and cannot be used to support your argument. You cannot possibly claim that all Britons will reject you because you like a certain thing, whereas most Americans will greet you with open arms."Now Britain was very powerful and yet still is but in modern times America has out done it's parent country in just a span of about 300-400 years."America has not outdone it's parent country in anyway, aside from being physically larger.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

The Stamp Act was repealed after the British colonists complained, and the Tea Act was actually extremely fair. The tea tax in the American colonies was one of the lowest in all of the British Empire, the only reason people view it as unfair was because smugglers created propaganda since the tea tax made them lose out on illegally smuggled tea.Youre right above but the previous guy here gave poor examples. The better ones wouldve been the intolerable acts. Quartering act, ect. Those were unnecessary. The main reason the revolution happened is because after the War of 1812 Britian was, not in debt, but needed to pay their bills and such. So, they really began to enforce their merchantile system that was put in place when the colonies began, but was left to salutary neglect. Its because of this lack of enforcement that the colonies began making their own government, rules, and liberties. They had this good, comfortable, functioning of life and when the merchantile system was reenforced they reacted harshly because it removed their liberties they established. Its easy to argue that the taxes were fully reasonable, but they nonetheless sparked anger in the colonies. We just wanted out liberties back and were willing to do whatever it took to make it so. Everything else about him saying all Britains reject americans and yada yada is a hasty generalization. Though, there is the stereotype were all fat...which isnt true. In fact, that shouldnt even be a negative thing because our fatness is a sign of immense wealth. If we eat well to grow large it is because we are fruitfull and wealthy. A fat person was very respected in ancient greece and rome. And we could argue for years over which is better.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

" The better ones wouldve been the intolerable acts. Quartering act, ect. Those were unnecessary. "From what I gather the Quartering Act was a piece of legislation making the American colonies pay for the accommodation of the British soldiers militarising the area. Which was because the French were threatening to invade, I don't see how that is unreasonable or unlike the system that most nations have today, where countries that have a large military pay for that large military." The main reason the revolution happened is because after the War of 1812 Britian was, not in debt, but needed to pay their bills and such. So, they really began to enforce their merchantile system that was put in place when the colonies began, but was left to salutary neglect. "I haven't a clue what you're talking about, you're justifying the American Revolution with a war that happened after it?"Its because of this lack of enforcement that the colonies began making their own government, rules, and liberties."What? You're first statement talks about an act involving the militarisation of the American colonies and then you claim that there was no enforcement in the American colonies?"Its easy to argue that the taxes were fully reasonable, but they nonetheless sparked anger in the colonies. We just wanted out liberties back and were willing to do whatever it took to make it so."Where was the oppression, where had your liberties been taken away? The taxes were completely reasonable, the only people who lost out were those who partook in illegal smuggling." In fact, that shouldnt even be a negative thing because our fatness is a sign of immense wealth. If we eat well to grow large it is because we are fruitfull and wealthy. A fat person was very respected in ancient greece and rome."In the modern era, rich people afford dietitians to make sure they don't become obese and die of unhealthy eating, while the poor engulf cheap fast food.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

In a battle we would obviously win. In economics we might win(not sure due to our current state). What does Great Britain do that we can't do or haven't already done?
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: Britain

"In a battle we would obviously win. In economics we might win(not sure due to our current state)."Your economy has only grown so large in the first place because of the free-market ideology that the British Empire enforced around the world."What does Great Britain do that we can't do or haven't already done?"On the contrary, what can the USA do that Great Britain hasn't already done?Great Britain has:-Created the nations of India, Australia , New Zealand, Canada, Kenya, Uganda and many more.-Created and developed the cities of Hong Kong, Singapore and many other regions which helped Asia become the economic powerhouse it is today.-Administered the longest period of world peace mankind has ever seen.-Been the first of the modern powers to abolish and suppress the slave trade. -Installed democracy into most of the modern world, from which without many nations on this planet would still be under dictatorship.-Installed banking systems to help national economies.-Enforced free trade across the globe.-Defeated many other nations which would have had empires much worse than ours.-Fought and won both world wars, as well as many others.There is other stuff, of course, but I believe I've made my point clear. We aren't the ones of have to meet the standards of America, it is the USA which must now attempt to try and get near to the magnificence and power that Britain has already achieved.
Debate: America vs Britain
Side: America

"Fought and won both world wars, as well as many others."Like did America not win both world wars and also and many more as well?We dominated in both wars. Even though the Atomic Bomb droppings were a little harsh in my opinion we weren't going to be pushed around. We aren't afraid to wage war with anyone. Especially Great Britain. Now i agree with you excellent example for they are correct, but if you do a tad bit of research Britain got their butts handed to them by America. America was never afraid of Britain in the first place especially when the Boston Tea Party occurred. We also have many more weapons than the British do especially nuclear war heads. They have about 220+ warheads, but America has 5,113 warheads. But wait here is a kicker........the cold war. We waged a war that Great Britain couldn't possible handle. Or the Cuban Missile Crisis? Yes we also handled that too. I could never imagine Britain trying to handle those situations especially when Cuba and The Soviet Union were against one country alone? No. Britain could never have dealt with that the way we did. Here were the results: - Withdrawal of the Soviet Union's nuclear missiles from Cuba - Withdrawal of certain United States' nuclear missiles from Turkey and Italy - Agreement with the Soviet Union that the United States would never invade Cuba without direct provocation - Creation of a nuclear hotline between the United States and the Soviet Union - Fidel Castro's position as Cuban leader strengthenedNow we have our negatives in this event. Britain could have kept the world at peace for centuries, but it simply cannot have stopped a nuclear throw down with would result in an ultimate catastrophe.