azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

I strongly oppose E learning as the main tool of teaching or learning.1.No motivation for teacher only. As most of you are taking online classes now, how many are really motivated to teach. it will not create that feel and interest to teach when you are just infront of laptop without audience2. No inputs from studentsthough there is a window for reacting,most of the students are not interested to react when we ask any questions unlike offline sessions where by seeing them we can ask about their inputs,which will be real3. There is no scope for demonstrations and on hands training.there is no real experience when it comes to examining a patient,howmuchever videos students watch, it can never match their tactile stimulation.4. No teacher student relationship.It is not only the teaching but the personality,body language and behaviour of the teacher which will infuence the peer gruop.Those will have a long term impact on students to build their career,which is happeneing at almost zero level in E learning.5. Not all domains of education are touched in E learning Medical education is again a school,in which student will learn variuos aspects apart from knowledge like,building relation with teachers,patients,co learners, descipline,counselling and communicating skills,reacting in a empathetic way. which v=can not be learnt in e learningI end my debate by saying,E learning can be a part of medical education but CAN NEVER replace the off line learning system.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

I strongly oppose E-learning due to following reasons:1. Can cause social isolation 2. More theoretical & less practical 3. Lacks face to face communication 4. lack of accreditation and quality assurance. 5. Lack of Communication skill development 6. Lack of inputs from trainers 7. Technical issues 8. Low -self discipline. 9. Low motivation 10. Distractions will be more.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

Dr. Shubha DB_2021A BatchI oppose the view of E-Learning becoming the educational norm in COVID times.E-learning has proliferated society during the COVID pandemic. Although it has some benefits, there are many risks, particularly for children. Excessive exposure to technology use can negatively impact the physical, mental, emotional, and social health of children. This can result in pathological behaviors such as technology addiction. There is a need to increase awareness of issues that may occur with e-learning among children and teens.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

I Dr.T.Sumalatha 2020B batch oppose the E-learning due to following reasons:1.Students and Faculty need to be technically updated which involves lot of time ,effort and expenses.2.No face-face interaction leads to lack of interest among students towards the academics.3.Difficult to assess the student attention during the classes.4.Internet facility is not proper in remote locations.5.There is chance of getting health issues like Depression,Headache,Neck pain etc.due to overuse of smart phones during long academic sessions.7.Assessment at the end of the course may not be complete in online due to chance of academic dishonesty among students.8.It is difficult to collect individual feedback from students.9.it is difficult to teach practical aspects like cadaver dissection, Clinical examination of patients.10.Teacher-student and inter student relationships are poorly developed
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

I, Dr. Anjani from 2020 B batch member of Group Webb “For Oppose” hereby submit my response. I would like to congratulate Dr. Rizwana B Shaik madam on being selected as group leader.The challenges of E-Learning could be broadly categorised into those faced by the students, the faculty and institution. Potential challenges for students:• Familiarity of learning in a digital environment• Ability to adapt to the change from traditional teaching platforms to digital platform• Not all students are adept at handling e-learning platforms• Access to internet – bandwidth and connectivity issues• Availability of infrastructure• Learning styles of students varies from one to another• Limited scope to personalise the teaching learning methods especially for large group teaching• Ability to identify reliable and authentic sources of information • Internal motivation and commitmentPotential challenges for faculty:• Hesitation to accept and implement unfamiliar practices• Lack of skills/awareness • Availability of resources such as equipment, space and financial support for the above• Availability of a sound broadband network that provides internet constantly and at a good speed• Availability of technical support • It is challenging to identify students who require more attention• Interaction, especially with a large group is challenging• Lack of face to face interaction • Planning and commitment is required for the teaching learning sessions • Possibility of malpractices for assignments• Support from institution/ administrationPotential challenges for administration• Provision of required resources• Financial requirement for infrastructure, technical support, software and internet access.• Conducting training /sensitisation programmes for faculty and students
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

Respected faculty and Co- learners,I am submitting my response to THREAD1.2E-LearningNeed for E-learning in Medical Education24th TO 26th MAY 2021 as Dr. Ayesha Begum  2020B Batch OpposeWe all accept the fact that all of us and more importantly our students have started e – learning. Now it is time for us to facilitate the students properly and blend it with traditional learning.It is always better to know the disadvantages of the system and try to work on the challenges and plan it properly before making it a part of curriculum.We should think beyond the pandemic in making such decisions.The disadvantages of e-learning include the following: 1. E-learning as a method of education makes the learners undergo contemplation, remoteness, as well as lack of interaction or relation.2. It therefore requires a very strong inspiration as well as skills with to the management of time in order to reduce such effects. 3. With respect to clarifications, offer of explanations, as well as interpretations, the e-learning method might be less effective that the traditional method of learning. The learning process is much easier with the use of the face to face encounter with the instructors or teachers. 4. When it comes to improvement in communication skills of learners, e-learning as a method might have a negative effect. Though might have an excellent knowledge in academics, they may not possess the needed skills to deliver their acquired knowledge to others.5. Since tests for assessments in e-learning are possibly done with the use of proxy, it will be difficult, if not impossible to control or regulate bad activities like cheating. 6. E-learning may also probably be misled to piracy and plagiarism, predisposed by inadequate selection skills, as well as the ease of copy and paste. 7. Also not all fields or discipline can employ the e-learning technique in education. For instance the purely scientific fields that include practical cannot be properly studies through e-learning. This all of us have faced while teaching during this pandemic.8. E-learning is more appropriate in social science and humanities than the fields such as medical science and pharmacy, where there is the need to develop practical skills.9. E-learning may also lead to congestion or heavy use of some websites. This may bring about unanticipated costs both in time and money.Regards,Dr.Ayesha Begum,ACME 2020B Batch
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

Respected faculty and co-learners,I congratulate Dr Rizwana B Shaik mam for being selected as the group leader for group WebbDr Vasavi Patra2020 B OpposeI hereby oppose E-learning due to the following 1. Absence of vital personal face to face interaction not only between learners and instructor but also among the colleague learners2. Needs a lot of inspiration and self-discipline to get motivated3. Health problems may arise like strain on eyes.4. Inability to access technology – requires training 5. Cost involvement6. Poor internet connection7. Not suitable to teach clinical skills8. It is difficult to control cheating during assessments in E-learning and also mislead to piracy and plagiarism9. E-learning can not improve communication skills among the learners though they might have excellent knowledge in academicsRegardsDr Vasavi PatraACME 2020 B Batch
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

Dr Vasudha CL2020 B BATCHOPPOSE_Group Webbcongratulations to dr Rizwana for being the group leader.I would like to oppose the motion "E-Learning: educational norm in COVID times".Yes the pandemic has made all of us take the online path for teaching as well as learning. But how well is it being received by the students remains a burning question. The disadvantages of e-learning are:-1. No face to face interaction with the students. Even if it is provided in a virtual environment the effectiveness is questionable.2. Infrastructure requirements are not adequate in most of the institutes.3. Technical glitches creates disturbance and disinterest.4. In medical education system, we need the students to become a physician of first contact who is competent in knowledge, skills attitude and communication, The skill component will take a major blow with e-learning.5. The examination or e-assessment part, still needs a lot of preparation and is in early stages, the implementation of the same has many barriers.6. Sudden shift to online teaching has become a greatest challenge to the faculty accustomed to traditional methods, who have no formal training to these new modes of teaching.7. Not many faculty development programs undertaken for overcoming the above challenge.8. More burden on the faculty to devise newer interactive teaching/learning sessions in a virtual environment.9. The effectiveness of such a session is gauged only by taking feedbacks which are sometimes not genuine.10. Virtual web appointments or clinics cannot replace direct physical/clinical examination in a OPD setting.Lastly, Yes, we are in the age of artificial intelligence, robotic surgeries, but lets not forget that the great minds and the hands that created them cannot be replaced by a machine.
Debate: E-Learning - educational norm in COVID times
Side: Oppose

Respected faculty & my dear co-learners,I, Dr Rohit Dixit, ACME, 2019A Batch, would like to respond to the debate and oppose the e-learning.One of the biggest problem with e-learning, especially online classes is that the teacher cannot monitor.. the students can just join the class and not listen to the class at all. Also the next important problem is though there is a scope for interaction, teacher and learner hardly involve in that. Next major problem is technical glitches.So to summarise, Monitoring, Interaction and technical glitches are the major coms/problems of e-learning.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

I believe humans have the right to commit suicide. And those who have suffered from severe depression know just how badly suicide can be desired. I feel that if one truly does not want to live, then they have the right to stop. However, I strongly suggest taking numerous things into consideration, and trying to get the help that is needed. And if nothing helps, and you are intent on dying, then people have the right to make that choice for themselves. It is our lives. We can do what we want with them.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

I absolutely agree. Thank you for an intelligent post .
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Well if God allows humans to commit suicide then they must have the right.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

It's your life. Not a whole lot we can do to stop people, anyways.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

yeeeap, I agree with you that is is our lives and nobody could allow to live or not to live.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

I don't think "right" is the correct term. Humans can commit suicide. Whether they should or shouldn't depends on who you ask, but ultimately it's up to the person who's life is in question. For the same reason it's absurd to tell someone they don't have a right to live, it's equally absurd to say they don't also have a right to end their life. What is life without the freedom of choice? Life is a choice.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: No

Life isn't a choice. Return to the beginning of a human life: Does a fetus choose to live?
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

No, you're right. A fetus doesn't choose to live. I didn't think of that! :-)Continuing to live is a choice though. Unless someone is forcing you to live or if you don't have a choice. In the case of suicide, choice is implied. Without choice a person can't commit suicide, right? What came to mind for me is that if you stopped moving, eating, breathing then eventually you would die. So in that sense, life is a continuous choice.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Well, this doesn't really matter. The right or not, if someone does, what will you do. Throw them in jail?! No. The problem is, assisted suicide. If someone wants to commit suicide but can't because of a disability, then they should have the right to be helped to die.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Well, you see, when the Gods give you life, they are really giving you a gift. If you decide to commit suicide, then you are rejecting that gift which would be considered rude in many cultures and obviously an insult to the Gods so they would destroy you, but, in a way, the joke would be on them because you would already be dead.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

I know it's deemed wrong by Catholics and according to them your Soul is damned if you commit suicide, I dont know how other religions view on it though but i'm giessing it would be something similar
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Well we all have the right to do whatever the fuck we want but whether it is "Right" morally or by society is an entire different question.Fact: You have a higher chance of winning the lottery 7 times than being born, thats how great the odds are against that one cell becoming a human being.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Most people are born with a survivor instinct, that makes them wanna try to survive no matter what. Some do not have this, and some lose it as they grow up.I said yes because I believe I have the right to kill myself right now.But I think that for those who wanna kill themselves, there should be some help they could get.I'm not saying the 'help' would help, but if nothing can help your lack of enjoy in life - then of course suicide is an option.But I think it is stupid to do it, without trying something else first - because if you succeed a suicide, there is no going back, and that should be taken seriously.YOLO!!!
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Why wouldn't they? We live in a world that fears and hates death, so I can understand why one would say that they do not, but it is your life. You are the owner of the physical body endowed to you and if you want to end it's life, who has the right to stop you; Someone who is afraid of death?
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

If someone feels they have nothing to live for and they think it would be better without them than yes they have the right.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Yes. If people cannot possibly escape from their dilemma, they should be offered the option. I personally think no one should do it nor find it is an easy, adequate away to escape. However, there are situations where maybe one should do it and God should grant them this right.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: No

and God should grant them this right.... So stupid.If you are incapable of coming up with something reasonable, logical, something that actually makes sense, then please, refrain from saying anything.There's no God. And don't start another religion/God debate, it's pointless, you'll never win it. You'll never win it because you'd get flooded with evidence, logic, reason, reality - something religion and God defenders can never provide.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

As a human being, I have the right to live however which way I want to. Of course I need to follow the law of the state and pay my taxes duly, but once I am no more I need not fulfill these tasks anymore. I am neither giving nor taking anything and hence a proportional part of the system obliterates when one dies. This would happen anyway when I die of aging (which definitely IS my right. As of course I could not have chosen when I want to be born. That choice was made by my parents. But who will make the choice when I will die? In an average scenario, my parents would have died already when my time of dying of aging came along, so it can't be them. Who else? My wife, children? No. That decision has to be taken only by me and my conscious reasoning process. Of course, if I have wife and kids my reasoning process would never allow me to make that decision, but that's just me. ). So why would the legal system disallow suicide? I see only see selfish motives. And against rights of fellow humans.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Yes. If someone doesn't want to be here, why waste space and resources on them? It's their own decision, and would probably help the world in the end (there would be a higher percentage of happy, progressive people, so humanity could move forward faster).
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

I believe that people should be able to hurt themselves and cause as much destruction to their own life as they want, as long as it won't physically harm other people without their consent. That's why I believe prostitution, suicide, all drugs, and more should be legal.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Of cource people have the right to commit suicide.Its their choice and their life and no-one can change that.It's a big choice to make,but if they have thought it through and they wish to go ahead i say "let em!"
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Yes!!!that is the most natural right that humans have...Only few do it ...
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

This argument can pretty much apply to most discussions like this:My body, I'll do what I want, so get lost.Personally I don't agree with suicide, but you have every right to do it if you so choose.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

I have never understood "agreeing" or "disagreeing" with suicide. What does that even mean? Do you disagree with the idea of it? The action of it? Or are you just saying you would not personally do it? Right now I am genuinely confused, not debating.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

yes it is their life their ending sand they should have the right
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

YES! BECAUSE ITS THEIR LIFE WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO JUDGE THEM.THEY CHOOSE FOR THEM FOR THEMSELVES THEIR FATE NO OTHER HUMAN BEING.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

The degree of ignorance on this debate is appalling. I would like to call particular attention to the phrase "permanent solution to a temporary problem." This is a pat response that completely dismisses the actual complexity surrounding depression and suicide. The crux of depression is that it represents an actual change in one's brain chemistry, and this effects ones perception of life and the world at large. Becoming suicidal is a consequence of this altered perception of reality. Few people actually consider suicide as a "solution" but rather as a way out of the pain they are experiencing constantly and over extended periods of time; it is not a choice for death but against continuing to suffer. Many of those who commit suicide endure their depression for months if not years. If you have never had severe, chronic depression then politely piss of with your "temporary problem" bullshit because you have no idea what it is like to struggle with that for an extended period of time; it does feel like forever. Furthermore, those who live with chronic depression are likely to experience it throughout their lives so it is not even a "temporary problem" for many. You may be able to learn to manage it better, but it is always a constant threat.To those who play the God card, firstly prove to me that your God exists before you cast moral judgement on those who have taken their lives. Next, you can answer me why God predisposes some people to experience severe and chronic depression. It is a proven genetic, biological, neurological phenomenon and if your God made all that is then he made this too. Also, the argument that God does not give us anything we cannot handle is obviously false since people do take their own lives - it is out of desperation not because they want to, and perhaps more crucially it is because of the change in brain chemistry.Finally, stop pointing your fingers at the people who have taken their lives and take a moment of introspection. If we did not have the sorry excuse for a mental health care system that we do (around the world) then suicide would be a far rarer occurrence. If we did not stigmatize and silence mental ill-health then suicide would, again, be a far rarer occurrence. If we did not discriminate against people for who they are we would have a lower suicide rate as well. Suicide has at least as much to do with our interrelations and society as it does with those who take their lives.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Some people suffer a great mental illness where they don't want to live anymore because they think things aren't going to get any better. To end the mental pain, they take their own life. In this case, humans do have the right to commit suicide.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: Yes

Rights, right and wrong, moral and immoral, laws, rules, etc., all made up by humans. If you want to make a suicide, go ahead. You would actually do good by it, by removing the possible genetic inclination of making a suicide at some age. I don't consider weak people highly even though in everyday life I'd not even care, I'd just ignore them or their particular characteristic.One must have a very weak mind to think and actually try to make a suicide.
Debate: Do humans have the right to commit suicide?
Side: No

So do you see people with Mental Health issues as being Weak and should be ignored how very enlightened of you it's this kind of thinking that leads to people commiting suicide. Your also incorrect a lot of people with great minds scientifically and artistically have been depressive or ended their lives with Suicide, Alan Turing, Founder Of Computer Sciences (Suicide), Hunter S Thompson, Writer (Suicide), Kurt Cobain, Musician (Suicidal Depressive) to name three people who are not thought to have been weakminded who have comitted suicide.