azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I also agree with my classmates because Chemical weapons are a faster defense and to save ammo. The best thing about chemical warfare weapons they were peaceful. "Silent but Deadly"
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Plus chemical weapons had a wider range and you didn't run the risk of missing your target.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I say yes I think that chemical warfare has had the greatest impact because it used nuclear weapons and chemicals.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical warfare had the greatest impact because it not only made it easier for the opponents to attack but it also involved less people.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Toxic are better then bombs cause bombs u have to set it and put it in the right spot.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

The first known use of chemical agents during WWI was in 1914 when the French deployed tear gas to attempt to disable German troops
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I think that chemical warfare had the greatest, longest impact and effect on WWI because it spread everywhere quickly. I also think that chemical warfare was the main cause of people dying.It killed 5,000 allied troops. Mustard shells are so bad because it still injures people on old battlefields today.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

The use of chemicals was bad because it contaminated the air and deformed millions of people and their families died so that family tree ended. It also destroyed the environment and will kill anyone who comes close. Because it never goes away.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I support that Chemical warfare had the greatest impact & the longest effect on the world during WWI. Chemical warfare gives us the advantage of covering a wider range. Even though there are injuries to the people in charge of the Chemicals, it is very effective & an intelligent war strategy.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical warfare has a great effect on the WWI because it help kill some of the enemies. It also makes some of them can become blind and not able to see so the opposite team can come and do what ever they want to them.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical Warfare is not such a bad idea. For you can not see or taste the chemicals. Also if we were to drop an atomic or hydrogen bomb on any one city or country, it would wipe out the advisory way faster than to send in a troop of soldiers.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I think that chemical warfare had the greatest impact on WWI because without the nuclear weapons, there wouldn't be as much mass destruction as there was. Without the poisonous gases we wouldn't have had as numerous explosion and kills with just guns or explosives.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I think Yes because it affected a lot of people and a lot of places.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Gun and bullets are not always powerful and it dont rid of enemy's it get rid of the people trying to kill the enemy's.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical warfare was used against Japan and other rivals. The use of these toxic gases limited the days of war and saved many lives.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Just now a chemical attack killed 25 people instead of me being more placid it's time to get serious. chemical warfare was noxious and some was very kindle. Lethal injection killed strong criminals that could not have been contained.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

I think that chemical warfare had a great effect on WWI because they needed a new way to defeat their enemies and that's where Chemical warfare came in! Using Chemical warfare we were able reduce the amount of tanks & gear. The stature of Chemical warfare makes it easier to transport!
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI because it helped in many ways.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical agents are grouped into categories based on their physiological effects. Lachrymators are primarily designed to affect the eyes, but also cause respiratory problems when soldiers are exposed to a large quantity of the chemical. Asphyxiators cause fluid to enter the lungs and prevent oxygen from reaching the blood. Toxic gases pass through the lungs and into the blood and prevent the circulation and release of oxygen in the body. Sternutators caused respiratory irritation, sneezing, nausea, and vomiting. Blister agents initially cause pain in the eyes, throats, and lungs, but later cause blisters on exposed skin.So cheicals helped them alot and effected it alot.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Back in the day tanks was slow and u needed most gas to use the Motorcycle.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemicals weapons in World War I were primarily used to demoralize, injure and kill entrenched defenders against who the indiscriminate and generally slow-moving or static nature of gas clouds would be most effective.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical warfare spread quickly which caused it to have the greatest impact on WWI. A lot of people were also affected.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical Warfare is a much quicker process. It allows you to kill the opposing armies without even really putting yourself in harms way. Also there would be a lot more money saved, if we did not have to build heavy machinery.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

yes because it killed so many people and so many that dint need to be killed because they were not bad guys
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Man power is not always good cause they think they are in charge of everything.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Yes , because it lead to the development of Nuclear warheads & it also involved less people..
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

CHEMICAL WARFARE WAS IN FACT THE MOST CRUCIAL WEAPON IN THIS WAR BECAUSE IT USED CHEMICALS AND BY USING CHEMICALS IT CAN GET IN THE AIR AND HAVE A MORE RANGE OF ATTACK AND KILL MORE OF YOUR ENEMIES.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Yes because unclear weapons can kill more than 5 people in less than a second.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Yes because a nuclear bomb can kill faster than 4 people with guns. okay.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

i think that chemical warfare did have a great impact on the WW1 if it wasn't for chemical warfare the war would have lasted longer.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Yes because, we are still paying for it today. With all the problems we have with our environment. Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

A lethal agent is designed to injure or incapacitate the enemy, or deny unhindered use of a particular area of terrain. Defoliants are used to quickly kill vegetation and deny its use for cover and concealment. It can also be used against agriculture and livestock to promote hunger and starvation. With proper protective equipment, training, and decontamination measures, the primary effects of chemical weapons can be overcome. Many nations possess vast stockpiles of weaponized agents in preparation for wartime use. The threat and the perceived threat have become strategic tools in planning both measures, and counter–measures.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

This is Correct Because We Are Today Still Paying For It . With Global Warning and The Hole In the Ozone Layer .. So My Answer Is Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

yes because it killed a lot of people that did not need to die. But it also killed a lot or all of the bad people that needed to die.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

The toxics was used against the Japanese. The different gases got into the spaces the bullets and the places that were dangerous to get into.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical warfare effected WW1 because the chemicals that were being released from the planes were leading to blindness and paralysis. Some of the chemicals were hazardous and soon they hit the soldiers they inhaled the dangerous chemicals they immediately suffered from poison and instantly died. Which led to fewer soldiers in World War I !
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Yes because a nuclear bomb can kill faster than 4 people with guns. okay. yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.yes, yes, yes.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

If we use the chemicals it will decrease the cost of bullets and weapons. But, if we use weapons and bullets the budget money for weapons, bullets, and stuff like that then we want be able to use the money to fix the broken stuff. Also if we use the chemicals it will help us kill more people than 1 at a time. Using bullets and weapons it we only allow us to use 1 bullet or shot for 1 person and you don't want to waste the limited amount of ammo you have, than if you have chemicals then you can kill as many people you can with one bomb or something like that. :)
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

TO NOT USE CHEMICAL WARFARE IN A WAR IS CRAZY!!! IF YOU ARENT USING CHEMICALS YOU ARE USING YOUR SOLDIERS LIVES. AND GUNS TAKE MORE TIME AND LABOR.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

1 phrase up vote much?
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Let's see how many up votes these get.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Chemical weapons kill much faster than guns and other weapons because you have a wider range with chemicals and you don't run as much of a risk of missing your target with chemicals.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

yes i would say it did because it hurt alot and killed alot of people. it probly would of lasted alot longer if they didint use chemical warfare.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

If you are hit by a chemical, you are killed instantly. But, if you are shot with a gun or stabbed with a knife, then you will die over a few minutes. Most people would stay and wait for the person to die to make sure they die... but when you will use the chemicals you will be able to leave right when the chemicals hits the person and get to other bad people.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Using chemicals wil allow us to keep our troops safe and out of danger. But, if we useweapons instead that is making a conflict come up between troops lives & and the generals life.. hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Because, when bad people go out in jail, that people can do bad thing one more time. So I agree we have to do a capital punishment.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

They made gas masks to protect themselves from the mustard gas
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

But how is that going to protect you from explosive things?
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Not many people had those masks. Because at the beginning, they didn't know the chemicals were coming.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

the tanks made war more technical the motorcycle could carry messages faster men had better guns
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

nope the tanks were slow and the motorcycles didn't have good protection
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

The chemicals could kill men faster, it doesn't matter about how fast the messages could be carried. It didn't matter how technical it was.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Tanks may have been more technical & slow but they had a whole lot more protection than motorcycles!Also motorcycles didn't exist then.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

What do motorcycles and carrying messages have to do with chemical warfare?
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

Guns & bullets are powerful that helps get rid of enemy's faster
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

But they also need intelligent people behind them that have good enough accuracy as to hit them in the brain or heart, or to make them bleed to death. Bombs hava a wider range so that they can kill more.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

We had better weapons and better Marksmen so the British couldn't overtake are ships
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

but what happens when you run out of chemicals ? guns will kill people faster than chemicals it will take time for the chemicals to spread
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

But what happens when run ammunition and the opposing side has another round in their clip.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

But chemical warfare covers a way wider range than guns so it may not matter.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

As soon as the chemicals hit you, your dead. With guns you have to aim and so if they are really far away you can't kill them.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Yea and chemicals don't miss and with a gun you have the chance of missing your target.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

The allied had the best generals,Such as eddie richenbacher, a great flyer
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

But it doesn't matter, we could kill him with chemicals better than anything. It doesn't matter how great of a flyer he was.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

This would be a great debatable topic, however it is not the one we are discussing
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

The chemical affected the people much faster, and in larger quantities. Once you breathe it in, you're done.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Generals don't always decide how the war turns out! It depends on how the soldiers were trained!
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

It doesn't matter if he's highest ranked or lowest, chemical warfare will still kill him.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

Using chemical weapons are dangerous, because when dropping a chemical bomb, rather than a small explosion, a massive explosion happens damaging area's that were not suppose to be bombed; possibly if it hit's a part of an other country or state.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

thats right Fong you on the point because if thay drought thay can kill your on people
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

the gun can scope down the target and plus the tanks can blow up a lager area
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

With chemical warfare all you have to do is pop the top and the rest, shall we say are history
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

One, that doesn't kill your own people that often. & 2, if it does it's killing more of the other people, and when your in the war, you know the risk before you even enter.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Using Chemical Weapons makes it easier to use things instead of having to use all those bullets to kill all the other people. Using the chemicals can wipe out lots more people with chemicals
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

I say no because the men who operated the tanks the motorcycles and the guns where far better then the chemical weapons
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

No, chemicals were better weapons because of the greater impact they had by killing and harming people.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

The Chemical Warfare Backfired And Killed Millions Of People.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

Chemical Warfare can harm us. Why? because using just 1 chemical weapon can kill off as much as 70,000 people and 1 million injuries.Then after the war he have to aid them paying over billions of money to aid the wounds.Like WWII the first atomic bomb was tested, the people there never knew they would die later on; and those people who lived around that area had kids who came out Morphed.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

i say no because we could use alot more and all other kind of machinces to kill alot more people than the chemical when the people are in tanks then the chemicals won't affect them as much because the tanks are thick
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

Just because they are they're in the tanks doesn't mean the chemicals won't get to them.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

Better bombs can kill more peoples and faster and bombs are powerful
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

The Americans were better soldiers than the german's the british and the russians
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

The soldiers are better but the british is killing mostly all our soldiers.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

What evidence are you using to support your claim? The Germans poineerd the elite Stormtruppen.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

American was better soldiers so it doesn't matter how many gas it will take
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

It does matter cause back in the day gas was really high and its was hard for them to bet the other soldiers.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

no because it because it backfired and killed half the people
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

So maybe they put the bomb wrong and it killed them for their own good.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

man is better because that is the traditional way and chemical warefare can kill you as well as others
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: Yes

This is not a good response, why would you even post it. You have now wasted time and energy posting this.
Debate: Chemical warfare had the greatest impact and the longest effect on the world during WWI
Side: No

Majority of these posts are not goods posts. Besides it is no that time or energy consuming to press 3 buttons on a keyboard.