azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science must have morality so the facts presented can be verified as true. If science is void of morality, then the scientists cannot be trusted with the data they present or with their opinions about that data. Usually, when people present science and morals as opposing forces, it's because they want to mutilate babies for research.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

In science you can coexist with morality. For example a pedophile who beats his kids to help deal with his hormonal urges to do sexual things with them is being very moral for scientific reasons.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

though its true that more often than not morality possesses itself as a hindrance to science but science itself is taken up for the betterment of human kind. how exactly are we helping humans by torturing humans unless we consider one life to be better than the other. when morality goes away from science, it pays way to ambitions that harm people, turning it into a viscious cycle. there has to be morality because there can always be another way to reach the desired conclusion.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science is a social undertaking and therefore is bound by society's determined morals. The scientific method of hypothesis, experimentation and conclusion can not be completed without the morals that is the only way to determine the reliability of presented theories. Morality is a human feeling that can be explained by science. Just as logic and emotion co-exist, so can science and morality.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science is a social undertaking and therefore is bound by society's determined morals.Pretty much true.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Morality is science itself. The logic behind my statement is that morality comes with feelings which are the results of firing in neurons in your brain. So whenever you feel morally biased in any situation there is science behind it. In this case science and morality co-existed
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Yes. Science explains questions about the universe, and morality is our perception of what is right and wrong. They can happily live side by side. Science and Religion is an entirely different matter....
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Why not? i mean first of all we have to go through the basic of this debate viz. "morality". the landscape of morality which we see, follow and on which we analyse today had been defined a long ago by theology. so we see everything from that point of view. let me ask some questions?why don't we feel pain towards rocks while breaking them?if we can reset the landscape of morality on the basis of science then i don't see why they cannot co-exist? does this mean couples will ask supercomputer to whether they want to have second child? then you didn't get it and that's not my fault.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Of course science and religion can co-exist. In fact religion can be the very reason one becomes a scientist and science has brought many to religion.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Of course science and morality can co-exist. They already do. Scientists are human beings too, influenced by the question of whether their work and research will lead to benefits for the rest of us. We can take the question and swap out 'science' for a number of categories - 'politics' 'religion', 'art', it all comes down to the people.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Thank you. I happen to agree.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

There hasn't always been a divide between science and morality or science and religion. But now it can be hard to tell how far science should go in finding answers. Can there be a co-existence between the two?This really depends a lot on how expansive one takes the definition (and therefore enterprise) of Science to be. If you operate on a very expansive definition of Science then morality would necessarily become a scientific area of study such as in other areas of the Social Sciences. However, if you operate on a more "hard line/hard science" definition, then our Sciences are light-years away from being able to say anything about morality analogous to a principle of Chemistry (if it even proves feasible at all, that is).
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science has nothing to do with morality. Now, the application of scientific knowledge does. Science is simply the search for knowledge. How that knowledge is used is where morality comes into play.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science has nothing to do with moralityThis depends on how you define science. Our science? God's science?
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science is simply a way of rationalizing the world around us. Morality is acting acceptably and properly. They are completely unconnected. Scientists are generally moral. Look at Jonas Salk. He invented a cure for polio, a disease that ravaged children and left adults disabled worldwide. He decided not to patent his cure, so that the world could cure the disease without his patent interfering.If that isn't moral, then I don't know what is.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

By very lexis definition, the Modern English term 'science' is a derivative of Old Latin's ‘sciēns,' which literally implies knowledge. Therefore, logic tells me the we learn about our true nature, the more sense we can make of morality in our Larger Scheme of Everything. Stated in a simpler term, science entails demonstrable evidence, while moral values lack tangible substance but manifest in subtle details that are easily observable.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

If science and religion can co-exist, then yes, they science and morality can co-exits.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

I think science and morality is absolutely different area to each other and science and morality must co-exist. We have to hybrid this two fields even though it isn't.Science is a powerful tool that can be killing weapon or can save countless lives. it depends on who is gonna use this tool. For an example, Appropriate Technology now increase the standard of living for the developing world without condescension, complication, or environmental damage.However, we all know many moral issues because of the development of science. Making a rigid law for science based on human rights must take precedence so that we can prevent science to make problems.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science can tell us things but it cannot tell you how to get to those things, that is a job for our morals and ideals. Science continually updates our morals, but our ideals keep us from too much harm as science marches toward.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

That's an interesting statement. "Science continually updates our morals". I would agree with that, I could see how our morals are tested and "upgraded" as science pushes forward, but I also believe our morals would have to update our science as well. What can/shouldn't/could be done is dependent on which one comes first. Almost like a chicken and the egg thing. Thoughts?
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The thing about science is that you have to be constantly open to new ideas, even when you think you know everything, and the thing about morality is you have to constantly be open to new ideas because as society progresses, morality must evolve along with or risk being combatative with new ideas.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

In the right hands, yes....................................................................................
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Although there has been quite a debate till today about an "objective" morality of some sort, Science and morality can, in fact coexist.. While science tells you things the way they are, morality in my opinion, is objective in it's most agreeable statements, in other words, if someone would look into "morals" one can find that it all comes down to survival as a species.. we're genetically hardwired to survive, and we can draw comparisons to how groups in the wild behave and find out they too, have a certain innate sense of how to survive as a species. With all that said, while one can reach a point where you have two differing suggestions proposed by science and morality, you're the king and they're your ministers, choose to execute which best suits you.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Eh?..............................................................................................................
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

I think so. Saying otherwise is a false dichotomy.........................................................
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Of course they can co-exist.Morality is something defined by the individual.It is entirely up to the scientist to not let his search for knowledge override what he thinks is right.That is not to say we should leave it up to a single individual to not break the ethics and laws agreed upon by society.However that has little to do with whether or not the two can co-exist.Now if the actual question is whether we should pursue science regardless of the consequences, then of course not.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Well, do they co-exist in the now? The question is simply can they which they do now you don't see a large scale conflict arising from it, in some cases religion ( which I will use as a standing point for morality ) has spoken of science in a way to support its claims and science tries to understand the other. They can co-exist now because they are two different things one is faith supported and more something naturally found within humanity while Science is the study of existing things, not opposites they both exist its just one is still being understood while the other is being followed and set. Somewhat.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Morality, weather in the context of religion or not, is rules defineing what is bad and what we should not do. Science, by the way of the scientific method, is how we find the truths of the univerce. So for one I don't see any contridections in the definitions, and two morality is not TM by religion in any socity the believe that some things are wrong and should not be done and that other things are great things to do should be done, that are the two side of morality and that ideal system, morality, can exist in in place that are not religios because people want to do what is right and not do what is wrong.(yes I know my spelling is bad) (btw this was written by a 13 year old)
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Yes, and it does coexist.One’s subjective morality may impact one’s scientific pursuit.For example:Should I study this?Should I perform experiments on human beings?The scientific study itself is amoral and mechanical.For example:Let’s take cloning.The cloning process is mechanical amoral process.Putting it altogether in co-existence:One scientist subjective morality says, “All cloning is evil.”Another one says, “Well, we can clone plants and animals, but no human beings.”The yet another says, “Hey we can clone everything.”
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Morality is a "subjective relative decision making over to what degree a behavior is good or bad". This can happen with an individual or a group of individuals. As soon as this becomes more than one individual, it becomes a Social Agreement between the individuals within the group over the "subjective relative decision making over to what degree a behavior is good or bad". This is not to say that everyone in the group would agree, but within any group some form of social leadership will arise and the leaders of that social group will determine what those moral rules for that group will be, either because the majority believes they are the right morals or because the minority has enough power to force those rules over the majority.Science is about learning how our existence really works and doing this in as objective a manner as possible while critically attacking every answer found to be true, thus trying to prove all existing truths found false, if possible. Those things which cannot be objectively proven false rise to become what is "Scientifically Most Likely True". Science is all about probabilities of what is most likely being true while constantly testing all results. Science has nothing to do with deciding what is moral and what is not; but science is all about understanding why we chose morals and providing us as objective as possible arguments to decide one moral over another, thus can have a great influence over morals, but not decide morals.Both obviously co-exist, meaning the answer to the question is obviously "Of Course", all one has to do is look at the existence we live in for scientific objective proof of this.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

They already do co-exist. Science has proven that a human life begins at conception, and moral compassionate loving people agree.There is one Party that flies in the face of Scientific evidence of the beginning of a human life, and this is the radical pro abortion Democrat Party.I realize there are people, acting like animals, who admit that life begins at conception, but simply do not care. Most of these people reside in the Democrat Party.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

They're mutually exclusive. The key to being a truly moral person is the practice of empathy. Put yourself in someone else's shoes. You are much less likely to do wrong if you think in that way.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Yes,why not.Science has never opposed morality and it has nothing to do with moral values.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The Bible is Pro-Life. Without its help, humans would lead to destructive cases of the world.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Has there not been strife and war because of people's interpretations of the Bible?
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

It’s really hard for Science and Abrahamic Religions to coexist. Non-Abrahamic Religions don’t have all The almighty dogma. I mean the Bible says the world is only like 5 or 6 thousand years old!? How do you proceed with progress with that kind of ignorance
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Difficult, sure, but not impossible, what was written was written for a purpose, a reason that made sense to the writer, if you can tap into their frame of mind and follow their thread you can make sense of it. Ultimately the Bible was never written for public consumption, it literally says "Only the Most High may approach the Tabernacle." the very vessel the law was transported in, the Ark of the Covenant. In this respect, there was a Priest class, which was more like a legal class, each town, maybe even each family, had at least one legal professional, people who studied the law, but were only allowed access to scripture directly pertaining to each case.Only the High Priest was entitled to study the entire text without restriction, yet this is no longer true, anyone can get a Bible now, pretty much everyone can read, so if you want a basis for error consider that, the Bible itself refuses common access to it, so ignoring that instruction is the problem. People need to be prepared by years, maybe decades, of education to be able to approach it professionally.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Civilization is about that old, Egypt is considered the first civilization, Hammurabi in Sumer was also before Moses showed up, point is the "world" may not refer to the natural world, but the human world, the world of law and rulers.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Yes of course. Science can relate well to morality and even science in some ways teaches morality so yes I believe science and morality can co exist together
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science is observations of nature, perhaps universal truths in a way, but circumstances change a lot that's the nature of reality, so if the world is always changing then truths are always changing. Humans are moral creatures, sure, that is an anthropocentric truth, not a universal, and from person to person we may see similar moral codes but each person will operate according to their own moral code, this makes morals subjective, just as truth is transient.In the end, we write Laws, or identify Ideas as principle guidelines, concepts of justice that are timeless "Definitions may change but Ideas are timeless." Mark Twain, stipulations of law change as we may need, but the spirit of justice is eternal, we merely need to translate a change to be true to its purpose.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

This question reminds me of a John Adams anecdote, (Founding Father, 2nd PotUS) : He had a dog named Satan, odd name, right? And yet not without his reasoning to it, a dog is a mindless beast, it could shred your throat out with its teeth, killing you before you hit the ground, but you cannot sit down with a dog and have a deep and meaningful discussion about the moral implications of ripping someone's throat out with your teeth...Point is, the world isn't moral, not from dog to rock to volcano, it's mindless, we are the only ones of that capacity, that divine or Godly capacity for reason. The world as science studies it is Satan, for intents and purposes, just as surely as John Adam' dog was Satan, God however is in the Higher realm, of higher reasoning, and higher emotion, not the baser, worldly, or flesh.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

It is a current fact that science and morality do co-exist:Corrupt scientists.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

They already do co-exist. Morality may constrain scientific advancement in the form of professional ethics, but we already live in a world with both and I don't see how the world would be improved by removing either in favour of the other.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science and religion have coexisted since the dawn of man. At times the two were inseparable. Today science has sadly become a religion of its own right and no longer uses the scientific method very much. Whoever pays for the study gets to dictate the results of the study. You'd be surprised how many scientist openly admit to having faked or manipulated research data to better fit the agenda of their employer. Peer reviews and the institutions associated with them have become the truth police and act as the Vatican of scientism. This kind of science cannot coexist with religion because it is in fact a religion itself, and one that tolerates no competitors.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

I believe both science and morality are indispensable part of our lives and they can't exist without each other. One keeps the other functioning in a correct way and checks for wrong use. For eg morality can be backed by science like sleeping with a number of people is considered wrong in many societies (science tells us that it increases the chances of getting STDs), scientific experiment of animals is wrong because it causes pain and pose threat to the animal in many ways which is a fact by science and hence morality says it shouldn't be done, likewise in Indian culture in some villages women are supposed to bleed in her first night of wedding as proof of her virginity, now we all believe that it is an immoral act and a wrong way of judgement (science says that hymen can be broken without losing virginity).
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

yes, science and morality can co-exist because science is the study of the natural universe, and character is based on opinion. For example Ukraine v Russia, a Ukrainian soldier is defending their country from invasion. Still, a Russian citizen in the Russian military is serving a moral civil duty towards their government which they pledge to for the promise of protection just as Ukraine does. Therefore either perspective is morally correct or morally incorrect. Another example could be that Ukraine joined the USSR by choice and there was nothing saying they could leave so when the USSR broke down should they have been part of Russia or should they have gone as they did? Science can be split into 2 parts theory and law, scientific theory is the explanation behind why the natural process happens, but scientific law is the explanation of what happened(TL DR: reasoning behind morality being based on opinion and perspective, meanwhile science is an explanation of the natural forces of the universe)
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

How to make cricket Id on Appabook and why Appabook is best Online Cricket I'd Provider?Cricket has always been a passion for millions of people worldwide. With the introduction of online cricket betting, the sport has become even more exciting. However, one needs a valid cricket ID to participate in online cricket betting. appabook is one of the best online cricket id providers available today. In this article, we will discuss how to make a cricket ID on appabook and why it is the best online Cricket Betting ID provider.How to Make a Cricket ID on appabookMaking an Online Betting ID on appabook is an easy and straightforward process. Follow the steps below to make a cricket ID on appabookVisit m the websiteThe first step to making a cricket ID on appabook is to visit their official website. You can do this by typing the URL https://appabook.com/ in your web browser.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

GET RICH WITH BLANK ATM CARD, Whatsapp: +18033921735I want to testify about Dark Web blank atm cards which can withdraw money from any atm machines around the world. I was very poor before and have no job. I saw so many testimony about how Dark Web Online Hackers send them the atm blank card and use it to collect money in any atm machine and become rich {[email protected]} I email them also and they sent me the blank atm card. I have use it to get 500,000 dollars. withdraw the maximum of 5,000 USD daily. Dark Web is giving out the card just to help the poor. Hack and take money directly from any atm machine vault with the use of atm programmed card which runs in automatic mode.You can also contact them for the service below  Western Union/MoneyGram Transfer  Bank Transfer  PayPal / Skrill Transfer  Crypto Mining  CashApp Transfer  Bitcoin Loans* Recover Stolen/Missing Crypto/Funds/AssetsEmail: [email protected] Telegram or WhatsApp: +18033921735Website: https://darkwebonlinehackers.com