azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Your just saying are you. Well at no point in my argument did i say anything about American soldiers going into Iraq and killing a million people. Maybe you should re-read it or you could try not being so ignorant in future(im just saying). I stand by everything i said. The best studies coming out of Iraq estimate that about a million people have died since the invasion. Now you'd have to be an idiot (and you may well be) to think that those deaths aren't a direct consequence of the invasion. Now i know that American soldiers are not responsible for every single death in Iraq thats ridiculous, the figure on that wikipedia page quoting the various sources shows that about 100,000 civilians died as result of direct combat and roughly a million have AS A RESULT OF THE CONFLICT.Again you'd have to be an idiot not to recognise that what America has done has created a lawless destabilised state lacking any of the basic necessities that we expect i.e. food,shelter,healthcare of any kind,education and the right not to be killed walking down the street. Now it is really that much of a leap in causation to acknowledge that this may have at least contributed to these deaths (i mean really) or are you so stupid that you think if America hadnt invaded a million people would still have died within a period of less than 10yrs. And whats all this for oil and more control over the bewildered people of the middle east, i really hope more countries follow Egypts example and shake off the puppet governemnts the U.S. has put in place to repress the people, its disgusting to even think about it.My original point had very little to do with Iraq and your attempt to discredit me is really quite pathetic the facts you presented are the ones i presented (i will admit i was little selective in my quoting). The point wasnt to get bogged down in the minuatiae of the Iraq war, Iraq was just the most convenient example to quote. There is a multitude of atrocities i could cite why dont you pick one it doesnt have be well known like Vietnam where America was responsible for the deaths of between 3-5 million Vietnamese (again a best estimate please dont post some wikipedia page quoting that actually the south vietnamese army was responsible this or that fraction of the dead or some other stupid ignorant reason that means America wasnt to completely responsible as they were and you know it, dont insult my intelligence for god's sake im a scientist its my job to get the facts right, i know the facts im quoting are correct i base them on the best sources of info. available). I really do hope you respond id like to continue this argument, actually one thing you never said was whether you disagree with the fundamental point of my argument which was that petty guerilla terrorism cannot compete with American state sponsored terrorism, why dont start by answering that im sure your answer will give me few laughs.Peace out.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

OK, so let me get this straight..... you think you're smarter than me ;)I'm sorry, but..., you're what? In high school ;)Do you even own a car ;)America has done has created a lawless destabilised state lacking any of the basic necessities that we expect i.e. food,shelter,healthcare of any kind,education and the right not to be killed walking down the street.Destabilized it to the point that they have free elections ;)I really do hope you respond id like to continue this argumentOf course. You are one of the reasons I come to this site. You crack me up ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I get my info from friends that physically live there. Now who's the idiot? Peace out ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Oh your friends live there do they, thats makes me a idiot does it. The fact that you know people there is as far as im concerned irrelevant, ya i know palestian people but i dont hang my arguments on what they tell me, again you've demonstrated how foolish you are. Let me ask you a question; please indulge me, do these friends of yours live in subhuman conditions like the vast majority do in Iraq(i assume thats where your friends are from), are they deprieved of the most basic rights granted to us in the West (again like the vast majority in Iraq) or are they like that silent minority of Egptians (~1-2% of population) who loved Mubarak as he made sure they lived extremely comfortable lives while the majority suffered terribly. If you think you can win a debate with that shit you are sadly mistaken,you use quite a unique arguing stlye, first ridicule the other persons arguments and then claim to know more than them by using some tenous link to the topic,no seriously you should get that shit patented you'd make millions.It could revolutionise debating. You might think im an idiot and you perfectly entitled to but any one who takes the time to read this correspondance will know exactly who the idiot is. I wasnt even gona respond as i was hoping for an actual argument but you pissed me off with that arrogant shit. Why not trying responding to my arguments (seriously any of them you responded to none and stop focusing on the minuate of Iraq im critisesing U.S. policy, Iraq is a very very small part of their artrocities, what are you afraid to defend your country cause you know you'll lose). Peace out.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

My friends are Shiite. They are not rich. They say that America has made some mistakes on the past but they are glad with the outcome of getting rid of Saddam.America is also for the Egyptian revolution and against Mubarak.America is also against Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.I don't find anything wrong with these policies.BTW, I did not call you an idiot. As far as idiots go, I think you're one of the smarter ones. Peace out ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Israel has had nuclear weapons for a very long time and they haven't used them yet so I trust them with those weapons.My friends trust America more than they trust Iran. Maybe because of the war they had with Iran or maybe because they are more secular than Iran. I guess they think Iran is just a bunch of little Shiites wanting to take over Iraq.America did speak out against Mubarak, just like it speaks out against Chinese human right violations, but it's their country. It's up to those people to do something about it. The Iraqis needed help and now they are happy to be rid of Saddam. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I think Iran would turn the nukes over to terrorists as soon as possible.Now, I find it interesting that the stuff I believe is propaganda but the stuff you believe is not propaganda ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Look im really tired tired of this and i was really hoping you'd actually respond with something meaningful that has a little bit if intellectual rigour about it. Im going to to do to you more or less what you did to me at the beginning of this argument."I think Iran would turn the nukes over to terrorists as soon as possible.Now, I find it interesting that the stuff I believe is propaganda but the stuff you believe is not propaganda." ;)Firstly; what you've presented is opinion, this is clearly demonstrated by the beginning two words "I think."Now i can respond to this biased opinion in a multitude of ways all of which i will think are correct and you will obviously think are incorrect. Even though im tempted i wont respond with my opinion as it will do no good anyway. Now i dont know what exactly it is you beleive or what sources of information you think are reliable but if you would tell me id be happy to tell you what i think of them. Now ive asked to find out who Noam Chomsky is,hes head of philosophy and linguisticts at MIT, hes written over 100 books (many of them best sellers), hes the 2nd most quoted author in history, he more or less created the modern field of linguistics. Please do not refer to this as propaganda (if you only knew how wrong you are), i beg you, go onto youtube just watch a few of his videos(even the 10min ones), approach it with an open mind, this man is the most respected intellectual alive for reason. You clearly disregarded all of the sources of info. i sent you why not try examining them for their veracity before accusing me of believing in propaganda (or do you even kniow how to).Now im not saying i havent thrown a lot of my own personal opinion at you but ive backed alot of it up with credible sources of information which ive asked you to challenge for their veracity and you haven't which is what is supposed to happen in a proper intellecetual debate. Look id be just as happy being proven wrong as being proven right thats what your faling to grasp here. In fact id be even more happy to be proven wrong but i get the sense no matter what is thrown at you your just gona hold tough with the opinions you have which i find really really sad and small minded.Plus im starting to think you dont take this seriously at all(the whole site i mean). You just come on and throw out your opinion (to get some weird ego boost or kill some time or something) and think you can win a debate based solely on opinion. Well im sorry if you've ever engaged in debating at a college level you'd realise how ridiculous that is but you obviously havent. I begging you not to respond unless you have something worth mentioning ive said this before. I dont want to insult you but your starting to leave me with very little choice.Peace out.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You are right. This is a waste of time because there is nothing I can say to change your mind and there is nothing you can say to change my mind.You were hoping that I actually respond with something meaningful that has a little bit if intellectual rigour about it. You say that my words are merely biased opinion. You say that I leave you no choice but to insult me.You want me to respond with what you consider worth mentioning. What makes you think that your words motivate me to do what YOU want?Yes, you are right, I don't take you or this site seriously. I throw out there alternative points of view that I find funny in order to kill some time. I don't care about winning debates because there are no winners. No one can ever win. This is not a college level debate site.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I dont want to insult you but your starting to leave me with very little choice.Let me ask you a question. Are you one of those radical Muslims? Your comment sounds to me like something a radical Muslim would say to, for example, his wife. "My dear wife, I don't want to beat you but you leave me very little choice." This religion of peace is really very violent. "My dear daughter, I don't want to commit an honor killing but you leave me very little choice." And this doesn't end with just the family. "My dear neighbor I do not want to convert you to Islam by the sword but you leave me very little choice." And the examples go on and on.All you want is to win a debate and force people to agree to your point of view and if they don't agree to play YOUR game by YOUR rules then you feel forced and justified in calling them stupid idiots. I bet that if I were standing next to you, you would feel forced and justified in opening a can of whoop ass. And the ironic thing is the peace out crap ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

First of all you dont know me so dont please dont assume you know what im like, who i am, how react in certain situations or anything else of the sort.I believe myself to be a good honest person who cares about others even outside his family or circle of friends. I have only judge your opinions, i havent judged your character as a person so why dont you afford me the same courtesy.My reactions are to your ridicule and smugness or do you think you are not guilty of these. Now, i deeply resent the accusation that i would react violently to you or anyone else in a debate, i admit i am very argumentative, i care alot about what i perceive to be grave injustice being perpetrated in the world by governements on their own people and by governments on people in other countries. Now it just so happens that your country is by far in the lead when in comes to the latter but your so stubborn that you refuse to even try to verify or check if this is the case.Why dont you look into it are you afraid of what you may find out.Again i refer you to Noam Chomsky. In answer to your question no im not a radical muslim, im a steadfast athiest and fucking glad to be as well.I lost my religion when i was about 13 when my best friend hung himself, plus im a scientist which ive stated already. Now just because someone vehemently disagrees with American foreign policy (that has taken countless lives and caused untold suffering) that doesnt actually make them a terrorist or a radical as you have obviously been taught by your government and perpetuated by your culture. I find your anologies to be very disrespectful. The reason i said what i said is because you havent even tried to check the info. ive given you, you've simply dismissed it. you havent given me any sources of info. to check either you simply made grand claims about this or that and backed them up with nothing.How do you expect me to react, i mean really, do you know how frustrating that is.Now i dont just want to win a debate i want to try to let people know what i know, they can make of it what they will, people make up their own minds in the end whether or which.What is very important is that people make up their minds when they have all the info. and my friend im sorry to tell you, you dont.As i said i would love for someone to prove me wrong, im objective and i will listen to reason thats how i ended up believing what i believe but thats obviously not how you conduct your arguments. Also i say peace out because i consider myself a pacifist, in almost my life i never laid a hand on anyone that didnt lay a hand on me first.Believe what you want.Peace out.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

i care alot about what i perceive to be grave injustice being perpetrated in the worldYes, so do I. But here's the difference. The problem is not the governments. The problem is the people. The people of Egypt were not ready to have anyone else other than Mubarak. Now, today, they are ready. Mubarak was able to hold on to his power because the people did nothing.And there's more. If the people of Egypt do nothing to keep radical Muslims from controlling the government, they will end up in a situation similar to Mubarak.The majority of the people in the world are moderates. Yet it is the radicals that manage to come into power that screw things up for everyone.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

I like how you phrase this "Now, today, they are ready." The reason previously is becaue it takes a lot of courage, conviction and determination to stand up to a repressive regime e.g. look at the tiananmen square protests of 1989. People are reluctant to stand.The reason they did is because food prices shoot up and they had no choice. I agree with what your saying but in my opinion this country would have reached this satge alot earlier if the U.S. was not funding the regime with billions. Egpyt is the 2nd greatest receiver of aid from the U.S. isreal 1st. They wanted Mubarak in Power and thats why hes been in power for so long so you not hold America accountable for this or are you to scared about radical muslims, let me tell you something about radical muslims, they only exist because America has done sio many bad things to them, i dont even know where to begin. All you want is oil and power why dont you stay in your own country you dont own the world (even though you wouldnt realise that from there actions).
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Egypt would have reached this stage earlier if they have tried to sabotage their government. They wouldn't even have to blow themselves up. Just blow up government crap. Not even an all out revolution. Just harass the government enough to force them into giving in to certain concessions.I'm not afraid of terrorists or radical Muslims and I don't care who created them. I think we should use intelligence to keep them in check. I don't think we should wage war against them. That's a waste of money.All you want is oil and power why dont you stay in your own country you dont own the worldYou don't think radical Islamists want power? You don't think radical Islamists want a Caliphate? You don't think that Muslims living in France and England and who want Sharia law should go back to wherever the hell they came from? Come on! It takes 2 to Tango. If you want Americans to go home, then you should also want Muslims to go home and get the hell out of the lands of the infidels. Human nature is the same everywhere. Middle Eastern people are not more just and pious than western people. America would not have been able to put a dictator in power if they were not able to find corrupt Middle Eastern people willing to brutalize their own people.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

My reactions are to your ridicule and smugnessIf you had done your research you would have found out that I come to this site to have fun and make fun. I don't take anything serious. You perceive me to be ridiculing your opinion because my attitude is that no one on this site can ever say anything to change anyone else's mind on anything. Do you think that posting a few links on the internet is going to change anyone's mind? I don't post links with the expectation that it will change anyone's mind. I find that to be a waste of time.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Thats fair enough i didnt realise that entirely so it does explain alot but i do think you realised from the begin that this debate had a more serious tone than other but you still continued on with this style.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

That is my style. Look at all of my debates and arguments. Just go to my profile and look. Once you realize that this is my style, you should have just walked away.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Fair enough that explains a lot but i still think you knew this debate was a bit more serious than other and you still contiued in this style.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

This debate is NOT serious. How can it ever be serious if you are only interested in placing blame? You want a serious debate, talk about ways to fix the problem. Everything else is just a waste of time.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Heres a way to fix the problem, people in american wake up from their deep slumber of ignorance and prevent there countrie from murdering other indiscriminantly overseas. Does that sound like a good solution cause honestly thats what ive hoped for, for a long time. Its the reason im conversing with you know.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You know, real men don't complain. They do something about it. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

How would you know what a real man would do you over-zealous (probably fat and lazy) american.You think your a real man do you, thats fuckin hilarious. Im not complaining, maybe thats what it sounds i dunno, im trying to prove you wrong but since you've flatly refused to engage me in a proper debate thats impossible.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Debating with you is like debating with a small child that still believes in Santa Claus. It is impossible to prove me wrong because my argument is that the world has been this way since the beginning of time. This is the world humans have created. Idealists like you have never succeeded in changing the world. The history of the world is my proof. You want me to show you links that you can dispute. There isn't enough room. Study history. Any part of it. And then tell me that it didn't happen. Tell me that Nazis did not kill Jews. Tell me that Romans where good people. Every country, every society has committed atrocities. Some bigger than others.You want to prove me wrong? Change the world. Stop talking about it in a debate site and go out there and change it. At least give it a try. And then come back here and tell me how it went ;)Seriously, good luck with that.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

First of all i already stated that i am deeply involved in many ways. You can be sure of it and if isreal or america do invade Iran then me and all the peopel like me (and beleive me theres a lot) will be heard.Again,i fail to see how this argument can be used against me, i have studied history and yes there always is an oppressive power but america is unique in their hipocrasy.Other empires made no bones about what they were doning. They more or less stated we've got big guns and were goin in to kill rape and steal.If America came out and said that id have a lot more respect for them. The hipocrasy is unpalatable to me.Now i admit ill never change the world probably no matter what i do, but im still glad to be on this side. If i was on your side i wouldnt be able to live with myself, thats the difference between you and me.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Well..., you stay over there on your side and let's see how much longer you manage to stay alive ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Oh, so thats it, your spineless, well why didnt you just say so from the beginning. I guess we dont have anything else to talk about. Good luck living your unfuflilled life.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

And good luck living your angry little life ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Again, you mistake anger for passion.There is a difference you know.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Ok. Good luck with your "passion." : )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Thanks, i will, i honestly think if i follow my bliss and do, think and stand up for what i beleive in during the course of my life, then my life will be deeply enriched and fulfilled because of that.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Good luck with that ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Thanks Joe that means a lot coming from you. Its good to know your behind me all the way.Actually i wish you were behind right now Uhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!! ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Well...., I know you wear your heart on your sleeve (and as part of your profile) and I just didn't want to crush your youthful ideals ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Thanks man you always know just what to say to cheer me up.