Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

I've gone through the first five, it is going to take more time than I have to do in one sitting, so I'll start with these, and you can refute me.Firstly I'd like to start out by stating that Kunt Hovind was a high school science teacher, I've been in college with science teachers, they shared the preliminary subjects with us to get a broad base knowledge and it ends there, the last maths module I did in second year had final year science teachers in it, they do not go deep into any of the disciplines as they only have to teach the basics, and the rest they study is to do with education, his PhD is in education and this speaks volumes.OK, here we go.(1) Dinosaurs lived with Adam and Eve, Sigh, meaningless assertion, have you any evidence of either of these people?(2) "Textbooks should be factual"I suppose they should say that dinosaurs lived with Adam and Eve, right?(3) Majority of the population believe in the bibleArgumentum Ad Populum(4) Lies should be torn out of textbooksHow does this work for religious textbooks?(5) Scientists want you to believe water flows uphillThis is ridiculous and a baseless assertion, the Colorado palte has been pushed up over time by plate tectonics. (6) There is no DeltaOutright lie, there are several, here is a book on one.(6) People see thing in different ways, "proved" by a ridiculous unfunny jokeWhat retard would assume that a calf can run and insert itself into a cow's vagina?(7) People that scoff at the bible are willfully ignorantWhat is this based on?(8) He correlates the fall of belief in the bible with the rise of democracyWould he like to return to the dark ages? Would you?(9) Charles Lyell hated the BibleThis couldn't be further from the truth, he was a devout christian that had trouble reconciling the evidence he found with his beliefs as were all of the Christian geologists at the time, he was an adviser to Darwin and was even at the end not sold on evolution, advising Darwin of the danger of his work, Darwin.(10) Shake up a Jar and it will form layersDoes this idiot actually believe that all of the Earths solid matter was dissolved in water? If this hypothesis was accurate, surely the bottom strata would be made of the most dense material.(11) Fossils tell what age rocks are and vice versaI assume he's referring to Index fossils, these are used to identify strata not age it, radiometric dating does that. People like Lyell and Darwin were wrong but in the fact that they under not over estimated the age of strata.(12) Meister foot print is evidence of man and trilobites living togetherThat is a cut spall, not a foot print, it superficially resemble a foot print.(13) Graptolites and Coelacanths, still aliveWhat does this prove/(14)  hand print from cretaceousNever verified, the piece sits in creationist museums and they don't allow anyone to take it away, as in they removed it from where they found it and it hasn't been aged.(15) Petrified treesThese fossilised trees that are seen through multiple strata (as Hovind excludes) are found around areas of rapidly changing geological topography.They have been shown to happen quite quickly in these areas, strange given Noah's flood was global, that petrified forests aren't found uniformly around the world.There is observed evidence of partially buried trees regenerating by growing new root systems in new soil.Petrified trees, as can be seen now, can become partially exposed by soil erosion, and buried again by new activity, strange that, I mean it's like they exist only in areas of volcanic or flooding activity.