azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Evolutionists protect endangered species

Environmentalists should continue to protect endangered species by protecting their habitat from destruction by human activity.Evolution is the theory of natural selection. There is nothing natural about turning a marsh into a parking lot and expecting the turtles to evolve into speed bumps.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Although highly expensive for taxpayers, it is our responsibility as humans save endangered species, for we interfere in their habits with our own ambitions. So, when an endangered specie is gone, it is gone for a long time. In other words, it is never coming back.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

One species "interfere" in another species's ability to survive all the time in nature. It's natural. Ambition is natural. Greed is natural. Selfishness in general is natural. We can try to save them all I suppose, because it's also natural to do that. But I just don't think we'll be any good at trying to control nature like that...
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

save them it helps our everymont and would help get medacine all that ect..
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

what? i'm not sure what language you're using. .
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Well, in many cases humans are the cause of the destruction of a species. Evolution loses all relevance when it comes to short range disasters and death. If we stop efforts to save a species it can have unpredictable results on the entire habitat; which my turn prove to be bad for that whole ecology. Biodiversity is a good thing, so let's keep it up by continuing to protect endangered species.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

Humans destroying other species is no different to other species destroying each other. That's how nature works. All species compete for resources and the stronger ones win..Biodiversity is a good thing? Prove that. Why should we have a billion species when half a billion would do just fine?
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Of course you should continue you saving them. You want the species to live on.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

Really? Why? Can you successfully save them? How many can you save?
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Ray Anderson spoke about how every scientific peer reviewed journal in the last 25-30 years stated that the biosphere is continually being shift to humans. While I don't think saving any and all animals is a good idea, we should give thought into how humans are very expensive to maintain in terms of ecological costs. While the biosphere is continually diminishing, it's only a matter of time when humans will perish due to the lack of food. First by the lack of variety, then the lack of amount. After which out of desperation, we'll start eating each other assuming that nothing changes. "In 50 years, if all the insects disappeared, life would cease. If all the humans disappeared, life would flourish"I think the solution is to find ecological sustainability in agriculture. For instance, the metric of a good fish farm is in the number of fish predators. If the predators are plentiful, that means the fish are a good supply of food.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

Firstly, I think ecological sustainability is even more elusive than world peace. This is because:- a) you have to know exactly how everything works together, as in how everything affects everything else. It's a mammoth of a task (excuse the pun). - b) then, you try to intervene. A bigger mammoth of a task. So, if we can't control ourselves and stop killing each other, there's no chance for ecological sustainability....In 50 years, if all the insects disappeared, life would cease. If all the humans disappeared, life would flourish This quote is useless because humans are not capable of destroying even 1 species of important insects, let alone all. If they all disappeared, it wouldn't be us that did it. They are much better at the survival game then we are.The point of this quote is stupid because it's comparing the usefulness of one species with another. Being a part of the system, humans got here the same way as any other species: through Evolution. More specifically, we're a result of the process of Natural Selection. Humans are as natural as any other species here and nature is much larger than us. Stop thinking that we can control nature somehow.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

I understand the fact of life that species do go extinct and appreciate the cycle. In the past I would have agreed with the latter because I just accepted it as that. But I can also agree with saving the few endangered species out there because it says on a whole that we humans can be compassionate creatures willing to give some species their second chances due to habitat changes and being shot down by poachers so often. The habitat out there isn't very fair and hasn't been fair ever since humans went Industrial, so I think there's a point in saving a few endangered species. At least just give them the chance since we can be merciful.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

I agree but i would add i support Eco-mercenaires who kill poachers on the spot. Human life isn't sacrosanct
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Stopping all efforts to save endangered species is stopping all efforts to save ourselves. We have put ourselves in a position where we can destroy our species, as well as life on Earth. Furthermore, as David Attenborough says, "Our planet, the Earth, is, as far as we know, unique in the universe; it contains life. Its continued survival now rests in our hands." Our species is like a blind tree trimmer, cutting the complex tree that represents the history of life. All life is related, and connected by the branches of the tree. We are blind because we do not know whether we cut a twig, a branch, or even the entire network. Not only is it our responsibility to maintain life, it is quite obviously in our best interests. As much as we like to think that humans are the best, that the universe revolves around us, we are measly beings on the pale point of light that we call home. We are no better than any other species, and we should consider them just as we consider ourselves. Jane Goodall, one of the most animal experienced people in the world, says this about our anthropocentric views: "There is no sharp line dividing humans from the rest of the animal kingdom; it's a very wuzzie line and it's getting wuzzier all the time. We we animals doing things that we, in our arrogance, used to think were 'just human'". In order to save ourselves, we must save every insect, every bird, and every speck of life that is endangered by human activities.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

So you want to play god. Saving every insect, every bird, every speck of life that is endangered by human activities? What a crazy idea. Truly. What makes you think we can? Do wasps stop and say "wait a minute! we don't have to kill and eat bees, let's just feed on leaves instead"
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

We are talking about extinction of species here, not individual lives.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

then it should be OK to kill some people to save others, human life is not sacrosanct
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

are you kidding me who would want to stop saving animals they cute and help our environment. Think if bees were not to exist whi would pollinate all the flowers. If there were no humans would there be this site. SO the weirdos on the other side have got to change their mind. Continue saving animals. they have rights too
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

You can't kill all the bees... if humans don't exist, species will still go extinct, it's natural to go extinct when your species can no longer adapt to changes in the environment.Animals have rights? Rights can only be taken, they cannot be given. Just as gifts can only be given, never taken.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Main cause of extinction: habitat destruction, followed by hunting.Caused by: humans
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

I think if the endangered species are ment to vanish they will, and nothing humans can do to stop that.....so it is very difficult to answer that question because the human kindness will answer with NO
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

I actually agree with you here, people can find meaning in life as an individual if they make a meaning of it. Meaning for human existence as a whole? I don't think so however.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

I think the solution is to find ecological sustainability in agriculture. For instance, the metric of a good fish farm is in the number of fish predators. If the predators are plentiful, that means the fish are a good supply of food.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

We should help to save them because we have evolved beyond just protecting ourselves. To only worry about humans would be selfish and would be bad for humans in the end because life is all interconnected. We can't only think of survival of the fittest because if we did, we'd have to let handicaps and retards die and or suffer.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

We are the "lucky animals" to have evolved with judgement and the potential to cultivate our environments. We are basically the World's keepers. A lucky thing to have happened if those on the FOR side argue that its "survival of the fittest" otherwise we'd be on the other end of the stick and something else would discuss this..But,If we stop caring, we will all be doomed. The planet would die, and so would we..Only the ignorant would do such a thing.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Save whatever you can, but you cant save everything... .......................................................................................................................
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

we are causing an unnaturally rapid rate of extinction, because we have caused the damage, we have a moral responsibility to to mitigate the problem. There is also an anthropocentric argument insofar as biodiversity is one of the best ways to understand the health of an ecosystem. By preventing the extinction of as many species as we can, we maintain that the environment might be capable of rebounding once we have gotten our act together.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

The world is like honeysuckle. One tendril chokes the other to reach for the light, believing they grow from seperate stems. When the sun shines, young leaves fight for its warmth. The struggle makes the bush strong, each branch seeking out the light and climbing ever higher. But when there is no sunlight, when the leaves begin to fall and the branches wither one by one, the stem must look to its roots for nourishment. The world is one like the moon and the sun. Like yin and yang. Push and pull. The world seems different to many but to the few who sees it as connected it is the same. Open your eyes and look around. Open your heart to nature and listen to the wind. Go into the woods and hear the words of the wise old trees. You will see.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

OK anyone who is dumb enough to say that we should stop saving endangered species should be forbidden because think the human evolved from the monkey so "humans" are technically an animal so what happens when the human race starts going instinct would you want someone to help us if we were endangered. I think you would.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Animals and plants has provided us with the medications we need in order to survive. For example, the rosy preiwinkle has saved countless children with leukemia and other diseases. Most likely has saved someone in your family. They try their best to maintain the pest control that we created by killing all of the predators that eat the prey. Take for instance, the mosoquitofish and dragonflies. Both of them eat mosoquitoes, and is on the verge on being classified extinction because of us. If these insects would still be blossoming in our area, we wouldn't be having the mosoquito problem and the deadly diseases they carry everyday. The problem is that people don't take the time out to see why these animals are so valuable to us. They can help us uncover so many cures, remedies, and even herbs that can keep us alive to live another day, but we can't discover their mystery if they are extinct.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

No, because mainly we are causing their extinction, through hunting or habitat destruction.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

yay, :) did you post on the debate about animal rights? you should if you havent, i think the debate is new but the positions are tight, but the issue seems pretty clear, animals should have rights.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

Yes we should, as far more species are being killed off by humans, and reckless as we are, we won't regret it until it's too late.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

It should be stopped and it should be stopped right now. I do my part by eating slow. For example, I eat breakslow and you people should too. Try it sometime. I think you'll like it ;)
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

what's breakslow? sounds like coleslaw....with Breakstone brand?
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

I tell my kids to hurry up and eat their breakfast so that we can get to school on time. My little one is so slow that I tell her she eats breakslow ;)
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

AWWW thats so cute............... hahahahahahahahahahhaahahhha
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

The production of high-quality caviar involves intricate processes that require expertise and precision. From hand-harvesting the roe to carefully grading and packing the caviar https://caviarprice.io/, artisanal producers uphold traditions and standards that ensure the finest quality and flavor.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

Hopefully your just trying to be cute but just in case, Breakfast - literally meaning "breaking the fast" of the night
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

True..., but you don't have to break the fast... Fast. You can break the fast slow ;-)
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

There are many other healthier things to eat other than "breakslow"!
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

OK..., name one..., just one. ;)
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

I think fast food should stop!!! It's unhealthy, they're bad jobs, and YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT GOES ON IN A SLAUGHTERHOUSE!!!!! I used to work in a slaughterhouse (I was stupid back then) and I had to do horrible things to animals!!! IT WAS TERRIBLE!!!!! YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF THE THINGS I'VE SEEN!!! THE THINGS I'VE DONE!!! YOU SHOULD BE THERE!!! Imagine a pig being chopped up, blood removed, and packed into a pattie, and served with pickles, ketchup, and mustard!!! Imagine a chicken being chained to shackles upside-down on a conveyor belt, dipped into an electrified bath of water, taken to a blade that cuts off their heads, and then cut up to bits served as your chicken nuggets. With that said, five words: FAST FOOD COMPANIES ARE SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Yes, that is right because nowadays it became a big problem. It can effect on our generation in the future and that is why parents should not allow their children to eat fast food. We have to eat more vegetables and fruits, or for example, vegetarian burgers. And do you know that some fast-food chain has created a program that targets Latinos with education on healthful meal selection and product composition as well as strategies for improving physical fitness (Institute of Medicine 2006c)? Concern about childhood obesity has also prompted fast-food industry collaborators to make strategic changes. For example, industry observers attribute Disney’s nonrenewal of a long term promotional partnership with a fast-food franchise to growing concerns about childhood obesity (Abramowitz 2006). I believe that these ideas are very interesting and creative. So, I believe that it will be helpful because nowadays many people pay more attention on advertising.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

If fast food was stopped, where would the fat people eat. They are fat for a reason. They have made bad choices in food consumption.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

first of all ! that is very rude. some people are born fat so they dont really have a chioce in that.. sometimes it is not because they made bad choices, it's because that is how they were born !! thank you !!!
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

Excuse me, people aren't born fat! People could have certain genetics that make them prone to putting on weight more than others but no one is born fat, that's absurd. Fat people are fat because they make the wrong choices and don't have a balanced diet or do enough exercise.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Nobody is stopping fat people from losing weight. They are just living in self denial and a heap of excuses.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Even if they are born fat there is nobody stopping them from getting on a treadmill and trying to lose weight.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Fast food "restaurants" offer consumers a convenient, cheap, and engineered-to-taste meal. At one point, the benefits outweighed the costs; namely, the costs of obesity and reliance on instant gratification, not to mention the costs of overfarming, genetic manipulation of animals, and advertising aimed at children. Now, I believe, that's beginning to change. We need to obliterate the fast food culture by making the costs overwhelming; we need to market health more often than bad choices; we need to market the delayed gratification of cooking, or eating well slowly rather than quickly.The main issue is that the United States has a culture, amplified by psychological practices in advertising, of unrealistic expectations of getting quality goods quickly and cheaply, yet without any negative side affects. We want to buy into a workout program where we can lose weight without getting off the couch. We want our clothes to be cheap and sweatshop-free, our restaurants to have a dollar menu, healthier options, and pay their farmers well. And that's not happening. We need to spend more, wait longer, and keep our minds open.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Yes. Look at the recent statistics about obesity and you will see my point. Fast food culture is leading Americans down the wrong path and should be stopped. On the other hand, if I was working for Slim-fast or Nutrisystem, I would keep my mouth shut. :)
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Man! It'll, like, kill you. It also makes you soopa fat and weigh 220023 pounds.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

But you can't say that it doesn't make a huge amount of money for the economy, without it I believe we would lose out on a lot of growth. It will not kill you, over eating fast food will cause your health to suffer but one portion of fast food in moderation isn't going to kill you. Also, there's no doubt that you will not put on weight, but certainly not 220023 pounds, anyway it's up to the consumer how much they eat, not the company.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

fast food is awesome and if you keep eating it we will get stronger and fatter, but then all of the salad places will be out of service so keep eating poop.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Yes fast food culture should be stopped because people in America are starting to rely on fast food more and more.. People should be eating more healthy foods, and there could be more healthy choices on menus in resturants.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

yess !! i think that it should. it is sooo unhealthy for you .. and it creates obesity that can cause death. and no one in the world wants death. well they shouldnt anyway... but anyway i think that fast food is utterly rediculus and a waste of time !! cause want to be fit !
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

it should stop.. look at how many people die every year from being over weight and heart attacks and shit like that. if food wasnt so unhealthy (ex.. a bigmac from mcdonalds!!) then im postive we all would live longer and healthier lives.. ohh and there be more happy people in the world.. cause over weight people tend to be more annoyed with life then the average size person. :] who agrees???
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

Yes. Do people know how much of Americas Obese ratings have gone up since McDonalds opened?
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

Yes. Do people know how much of Americas Obese ratings have gone up since McDonalds opened?Correlation does not mean causation.
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture stopped

O and its really nasty.... McDonalds chicken nuggets bounce
Debate: Should fast food culture be stopped?
Side: Fast food culture continues

O and its really nasty.... McDonalds chicken nuggets bounceSo does freshly baked bread...