Debate: I Don't Understand Feminists... Men Are Dominant.
Side: Men Are

You, as with most feminist, negate the evolutionary factors that led to such a societal construct. And you negate the psychological factors that would cause for men to be put in positions of higher power. Women are different decision makers than men, and it just so happens that the fields in which men make the best positions are powerful fields (such as business).Women are more likely to go to college, more likely to hold higher degrees, more practiced at multitaskingThough it's quite funny that men are the ones in the highest positions- I say this because your 'degree' has nothing to do with your intelligence. Any woman can remember a bunch of facts and get high score on a test, but to actually intellectualize the data you're assessing takes a certain mentality- and I am not saying that only men are intellects, though most intellectual (not powerful) positions (science, philosophy) are also mainly held by men... why do you think that is?Also, why is that most self-made millionaires and billionaires are men? This has nothing to do with society (hence "self-made").You see the distinct mentality in children. Boys are more mechanical and are more inquisitive about puzzles, girls like pretty things such as colorful dolls (there is also a correlation with women liking the color pink).You seem to negate the fact entirely that males are more dominant than women- which is a feminist extremist view that is entirely irrational. Men are indeed more dominant, and always have been.Plus, most people feel women are weaker intelligently, despite opposing evidence, and don't want to put their money in a company run by women.Women make a lot of decisions based on emotion (whether it be subconscious or not). That being the case, it's quite hard to trust someone with loads of money that may make a terrible decision one day because she's feeling like a whale because she feels her husband doesn't look at her the same.Also, why do you think women are mainly in nursing and teaching fields? It could be the case that their evolutionary instincts renders them more fit for such field (they have instincts for childcare which would include medically attending to their wounded child (in a way in which they would see best fit), and since women are designed to raise the child, teaching would have to be an essential skill to have.Biologically, men have become dominant because by being dominant, they could control female sexuality, and minimize the risk of raising another man's child. However, societally, we should and mostly have moved past this, and in light of that, women are not subordinate.Is this a prime illustration of women's ability to reason? Perhaps your emotions deluded your reasoning? If it is a biopsychological reason for a trait... how would you expect society to just bypass such a trait? This is tantamount to telling homosexuals to stop being gay because society deems it inappropriate.Lastly, most women like being less dominant. They openly admit to wanting a husband that makes more than them, they want men older than them, they're attracted to men who have a dominant social status, etc. Why do you think there is a stigma for middle school jocks and geeks? The jocks get more girls simply because they express dominance (sociologically and physiologically). But in college (respectable ones), the smarter guys get more girls because this dominant trait becomes more apparent, as they will typically have more money which the aforementioned trait is more attractive to women.