Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

There are a lot of Muslims that "know" what's best or better than what is currently. I'm sure you won't mind them passing laws forbidding women from wearing clothing other than a Hajib. You're just like them.Clearly you misunderstood everything.Which question?"You think that would not be healthy for humanity?" Was the question. It's a yes or no question.As I said, "[The fact] that you would use force to achieve your ends...is an act of an aggressor, a willful person who will force their opinion on others and is, in fact an acknowledgement that you believe that ONLY you are right.Anyone that disagrees with YOU is forced to have their opinion subjugated to YOUR opinion and that makes it apparent that YOU think that ONLY YOU are right.Which part of "In those sentences, can you see the word 'only'? I sure can't." can't you understand?If I, and others ostracize someone and they initiate force, they have shown that they do not accept the use of force against them, so yes, I would use force. Again, the response to force with force is not the same thing as initiating it.In this particular case you would be the one initiating force.If they aren't then neither are mine. You have no proof of harm, whereas I do.There are different kinds of harm, not only physical.Great, we should force other people to do what you want because you're certain. How nice for everyone else that is certain that you're wrong.I think you missed most of the sentence... I'll copy-paste it: "I am 'very certain' that most would agree with me, at least here where I live."Ah, far be it for a zealot to suggest that someone else might be more enlightened.You might want to check the definition of zealot next time you intend to use it. You make yourself sound stupid, not that that's something new...You calling me a zealot. In that case aren't you one also? You sure seem to be.Not on par with football, rugby, hockey, MMA etc. You're not seriously equating the two are you? Obviously you are because you suggested that someone might walk "off a cliff...breathe deadly gases...yawn [and] choke... to death [on a bug]"How ridiculous can you get?You initiated the ridiculous example, not me.There is mountain climbing. Have people not died doing it? Let's ban it! Breathing deadly gases and vapors... plenty of examples of its danger. Would you suggest wearing gas masks, all the time? Choking on a bug... well, you began the ridiculous example, I just added to it.You show it's ridiculous by referencing absolutely negligable risks when there are known risks and guaranteed damage from what examples I provided. Pathetic.You did notice that you began with this ridiculous example?Construction is a risky job. Why not ban that too?Life is a constant risk! Would you suggest banning it? Pathetic.Escapism is addictive.Escapism suggests that there is something mentally wrong with the person...Physical addiction to marijuana has been disproven. Damage from marijuana has been shown only in smoking of it.Doesn't matter if it is physical or mental addiction, they are both bad.Only through smoking? As in lungs are messed up?Glad to see you're just as self righteous in other things.Glad to see you are still as stupid.It doesn't matter if I do. I won't force others to not do them, unlike you.(reading books and stories, listening to music) When exactly did I say I would force others not to do them? I have trouble recalling this particular instance... Perhaps because I never did? Does this sound familiar?Obviously I was stating those positions to show how abusive your position was. I don't believe we should ban either, nor should we ban mothers from feeding their children at some arbitrary age that offends you.You think feeding a 6 year old is not wrong? If so then your mind is a mess. Just saying.I wouldn't ban them. It was an exercise showing the abuse of your position.You don't seem to understand a single thing I'm saying. You seem to think if I would, given a chance, ban some things, I would ban everything? You realize how stupid that sounds?There is no abuse in my position. As I have stated before, some people are too stupid to do things right on their own. You would let them go their way, do things the wrong way?Well, there is really no right and wrong, but since we do exist... I doubt you'll get this.You propose to forcibly seize children from mothers that wish to breastfeed past an age that you deem appropriate. Yes, sir, that clearly is a brute.That who tries to save someone from making a suicide is also a brute? The ones who make laws are also brutes?Call me what you want, it won't make it true.Abuse: to hurt or injure by maltreatment.Dictator: person who makes pronouncements, as on conduct, fashion, etc., which are regarded as authoritative.You satisfy both definitions. You wish to hurt, injure, and maltreat those that defy your pronouncements which you regard as authoritative.And you don't fall under this particular definition of "dictator"? You sure seem to.I don't satisfy both statements. You may think I do, but that doesn't make it true, again.You know what maltreatment means? I do.You mean traits like motor neurone disease from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? I assume you'd suggest we should've prevented Stephen Hawking from ever coming into this world.This is getting far beyond the initial topic (been there for a while really), and no. No because he had and has a great mind.But basically, yes.I have shown exactly how your logic follows the same as all oppressors. You dictate what is right and is wrong for others, you deny their humanity by calling them weak, you are willing to use force to achieve your ends.You just proved you know nothing of my logic.What exactly do you mean under weak? You make it sound so simple when in reality it is far more complicated. I don't envy your simple life, although life is simple.It does not follow the same as all oppressors, for one I am not stupid as they were. If they had my mind and the following of so many people they would not have failed, nor would they have fucked up everything else the way they did.You dictate what is right and is wrong for others,I dictate? I have only expressed my thoughts, opinions, ideas, etc.I do know what is right and wrong. And I've shortly explained this before, at least I think I did.you deny their humanity by calling them weak, you are willing to use force to achieve your ends.In what way do I deny them their humanity? And who exactly do I call weak, as you seem to claim being an expert of me?Humanity is relative. So you should specify what you mean under it, or don't use it.Force may only be used if everything else fails and if in the end it is beneficial.or what? You'll prohibit it? Use force to make me stop?My copy paste showed clearly how abusive you are. Deny it all you want, the facts speak for themselves.Well, look at who can copy paste.That copy paste showed nothing other than you can do it.The only fact is that you simply aren't getting a thing I'm saying and that you claim to know me when in reality you don't. The facts speak for themselves... I'll let you figure out the end yourself, doubt you can or will but still.As I said somewhere up there, you can call me however you want, it does not make it true. But if you were wise you would not call me anything I clearly am not (the things you called me). Just makes you look mentally incapable.