azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

Men can be attracted to Men.. BUT... Gay Marriage shouldn't be accepted. Think about it, What will happen if Gays are accepted? There will be an increasing amount of Gays. That will create population decrease everywhere, and that's going to lead to an end in the human population.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

If people accept that it's okay to like peas, will everyone in the world begin liking peas?
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

We can't have the whole world likingh peas -- because we will soon run out. We need a minority of people to like zucchini.Which reminds me. Someone needs to invent a zucchini detector, to stop people from smuggling it into my house. Why do all these people keep bringing me zucchini? Are they trying to turn me into a zucchini lover?
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

gays are born, not turned. Gay people cant make more gay people and they alwasy would be the minority. Look at Canada or places where gays are aloud to marry, i havent herd on the news: canada's population gone!
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

Actually, there are a number of cases cited in which homosexual behavior is a byproduct of childhood sexual abuse.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

if you go deeper in psychology and genetics you will find that the causes of homosexuality are still unknown meaning that your argument is only a theory wish means its irrelevant and unproven.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

Wait a minute..., that's not entirely true. Metrosexuals are turned not born. ;)
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

Gays are not born.Any evidence pointing to that direction tends to be correlative and only applies to homosexuality in males...
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

Actually its been scientifically proven that the reason people are attracted to the same sex is usually because they have more of the opposite hormones that their sex is supposed to supply. For example. Say female hormones are x's and male hormones are P's well if a male and a male are interested in each other the male produces more x's then p's. Nothing wrong with it, it's normal and it human. Nobody is born perfect and nobody is born flawless. If a man and a women are together awesome! if a women and a women are together great! if a man and a man are together then at least they can act like more of a man then most straight guys can. They aren't afraid of people who are against them they just want to be happy and go for it.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

Nothing wrong with it, it's normal and it humanLOLa- I would like to see evidence of this hormone thing.b- That is NOT normal or humane is it then? It's a mix up. Chemical imbalance. w.e. you want to call it.c- You're basically telling me that to get rid of all these bumpunchers all we need to do is inject the correct hormones?act like more of a manNO real man is gay.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

No you misunderstand what I said I meant that there is nothing wrong with being different and that its normal to have problems either mental of physically and nobody needs shots of any hormones. (wouldn't work) Also it doesn't matter if they want to have sex they are obviously not going to go right in front of you and do their business. So like I said stop paying attention to those really stupid details... you're obviously one of those ass hole guys who find it ok for two women to make out and two men can't. If a man is born with all his essentials than HE IS A REAL MAN! Pretty sure gay guys have junk in there pants just like you do. They bleed red like you do and they pee, eat, burp and pass gas like you do!
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

considering your gay hate..........I found this to be amusing,..Early man was called Homo Erectus....not hetro erectus!
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

It's not a short term effect... It's a long term effect.. It's not like a natural disaster, but like a plague
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

that is so WRONGGGGGGGG! You really need to do your homework. Did you know that way back during the Greeek times, Men and women only had intercourse to reproduce. Sexual pleasure came from same sex intercourse. Most people will always want children weather they are gay or straight
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

Well considering we have a OVER populated planet already instead of having to rule how many children a family is allowed to have like China. Why is more gays a bad thing if gay marriage will lead to a slow down in population growth then why hasn't it been legalized sooner? Would you rather have no gay marriage and a over populated plant where children are starving due to having a insignificant amount of food because that is where we are now and going more so to in the near future.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

Taking in the worlds resources into consideration, I believe that a drop in population would do the world a lot of good right now.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: No

There will be an increasing amount of Gays.That is a lie!, there would be an increase in gay marriages yes, But not an increase in gays. Your not raised to be gay! It's more of a mental thing, I mean think about it for a minute, If we are raised to like the opposite sex? then why are there so many people wanting to marry the same sex?
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

if 20 percent of children that are born are homosexuals means 80 percent are not ...the percentage cant be altered into saying the 20 percent will influance the 80 and there would be 100 percent homosexuals...tht is totaly absurd. the gay people will marry gay people and the straight would marry straight people as simple as that.allowing the gay people to get married wont alter the fact of their existance it will alter your conception of their existance. preventing same sex marriage is just like racisme,slavery,despotisme...do not ask for your own rights if you cant ask for the right of an other human.
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

What will happen if Negros are accepted? There will be an increasing amount of Negros! That equal rights thing is dangerous!
Debate: Should Gay marrige be legal in the United State of America?
Side: yes

really? if people already are gay and become married thats not going to lead to an increase in the ammount of gays. plus, i think the world needs a bit of a population decrease anyways
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

I don't agree entirely with this, but automatic and semi automatic weapons should be banned. Gun don't kill people, people do is a valid statement, but a homicidal person with a semi automatic weapon can kill a whole lot more people before being controlled than if they had a knife. As for non-automatic weapons, they should require a license.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

The beliefm that automatic weapons should be banned holds no more water than any other arguement. A gun is a gun. the mmount of fire it produces makes no difference, and in the hands of an ordinary law abiding citizen a tank, granade launcher or nuclear missile does not pose a threat to anyone becuase he has no intention of using it. In the hands of a criminal, an ink pen can be rammed into an eye and used to kill someone.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

A gun is a gun.Baloney.If a person goes crazy and kills 10 people vs killing 100 people - ask the other 90 if the lethality of the weapon makes a difference.in the hands of an ordinary law abiding citizen a tank, granade launcher or nuclear missile does not pose a threatEvery criminal was an ordinary law abiding citizen until the moment they weren't. There is also the risk of accident, theft, etc.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

You are ok with mass shootings of 10, but not of 100?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

I'm ok with 0 shootings - am less ok with shootings of 10 and even less ok with shootings of 100.you?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

I am ok with 0 shootings and not ok with any victims. We should be preventing crime, not trying to make it a more appealing crime.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

Are you saying we should ban ALL guns? (and knives, etc.)
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

No. That doesn't prevent crime.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

Do you agree with geneF's position that fully automatic weapons, grenade launchers, and nukes should be just as accessible as other guns?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

No. I don't see a need to ban automatic weapons though.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

No.Then you were agreeing with my position all along.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

You don't want to ban automatic weapons?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

I think balancing individual liberty with individual lethality is a valid public interest.Automatic weapons aren't completely banned right now, but very few people have them - seems to be about the right level.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

If you think about it, semi-automatic weapons are much more dangerous than fully-auto weapons are. Fully-automatic weapons are chambered for thinner rounds, making them less effective at killing.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

ask the other 90 if the lethality of the weapon makes a difference.What are you trying to say here? Guns are all equally lethal; their one purpose is to kill.Every criminal was an ordinary law abiding citizen until the moment they weren't.Okay, fair enough. So, should we attempt to take away means of crime or attempt to prevent the upbringing of criminals? Both seem equally difficult.There is also the risk of accident, theft, etc.Again, this is punishing the good Samaritan for the misdeeds of another, not-so-good-spirited person.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Guns are all equally lethalIs a BB gun as lethal as an Uzi?Both seem equally difficult.Both are difficult, yet we can/should take prudent steps towards each.this is punishing the good SamaritanConsidering that accidents happen has nothing to do with punishing good Samaritans.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

Is a BB gun as lethal as an Uzi?You've got me there, I presume. Most, but not all guns, are almost equally lethal.towards eachKilling people will always be possible. Lockpicking and stealing will always be possible. You can't stop crime from happening unless you stop the criminal from being created. At least, that's how I see it.punishing good Samaritans.You aren't just considering that accidents happen, you're punishing people who have nothing to do with said accidents just because those people may or may not be similar to the wrongdoer.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

lethalityThe only way the lethality of a gun can change is if you use BBs instead of rounds.until the moment they weren'tThat doesn't mean that all citizens become criminals. It means that, if a person grows up in a bad place, there's a chance he might be a bad person.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

A gun is a gun. the mmount of fire it produces makes no differenceOh, OK then. So a cigarette lighter is the same as a flamethrower?I just don't understand how an entire nation of people became so thoroughly stupid.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

This is the reason American is the way it is, the people that stubbornly believe one point without the chance of another existing. Yes it makes a difference since guns aren’t used for decoration if someone buys a gun, i don’t no about you, but that means they intend to use it for various reasons. Owning a gun itself is dangerous, and require certain qualifications. And while most use guns to hunt. Their are a few that use guns for self defense. And some guns get into the the hands of people with bad intentions, since people kill, not guns. Are we supposed to get rid of the people. No, that’s simply impossible. Now here brings to my point, even if guns get into the hands of law abiding citizens who don’t intend to use them, then what is the point of own a gun? A lethal weapon with just one motion you can seriously cause some harm. I don’t think people really grasp that idea…
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

i dont agree, it doesnt matter what kind of gun it was. IF Auto GUNS DIDNT EXIST... it STILL woulda heppened..... IF NO GUNS EXISTED AT ALL..... it still woulda happened...... same amount of people... same outcome... wich is people dead.. i DO think they would of still killed 20 kids and 6 teachers if that was his intention...... never said anything about slapping either... i said that he would train and train... idc if it took 10 years..... he wouldve made it a POINT... to make what he wanted to happen... happen.. he would plan it to the T... and make sure that they died.. if thats what he wanted... one way or another.. without a gun or knife... if thats what he wanted... thats how crazy people work. i dont agree..... if those people ( crazy people ) had a sledgehammer ( a gun) i DO NOT think that they would drive the coffin ( kill people) in the ground faster than if they had a regular hammer... ( their own fists and feet ) ...... Because..... Those people who are crazy enough to do that, are also crazy enough to make SURE it happens.. and put plan, and effort into it... they would learn martial arts, (the kind that can kill people in the blink of an eye ( the same speed as a bullet))... our human body is just as dangerous as a gun... and those crazy ass people would put so much training and planning into their actions that the same result would happen. ( my opinion ( as this is a debate)).
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. No matter how hard a martial artist trained, I don't see how they could be able to kill people as fast as a semi-automatic weapon. Yes, people would have still been killed, but that many? I don't think so. When I say yes to the question "Should guns be banned in America?", I don't believe that hunting guns would need to be banned. Yes, they can kill people, but not as fast as a semi-automatic, giving more time for the criminal to be stopped. I do not see the need for semi-automatic weapons to be purchased by anyone. When you go hunting, I doubt you assault the deer. I do agree with you on what you said about how crazy people will go far to make their point, but I still believe that semi-automatics should be banned. That is just my opinion.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Guns shouldn't be allowed becuase pole with their short temper kill others without regret. All gun should be banned. We should follow China's example. You never see guns there.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

Guns don't kill people, but people uses guns to kill people.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

People use knives to kill people - should we ban knives? What happens if you ban guns is that people who don't follow the law are just going to keep their guns and people who follow the law can't protect themselves, so the criminals would find it easier to kill them.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

So we should resolve conflict with more conflict? There is a reason why MLK jr. went down in history as the greatest civil rights activist.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Semi-automatic guns shoot single rounds.... So we can't have pistols but are allowed to only used 12 gauge pump shotguns or hunting rifles?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

Yes, i believe this to be a valid argument. I personally support you argument completely; especially the license.To those who say that guns should be banned completely, There are those uses of guns which should be allowed, for example, hunting animals?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

yes because some people in America cannot be trusted with one i understand that if its for your protection then yeah go ahead and have one but I'm just saying most crimes happen with handguns.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

The argument "no, guns don't kill people" is ridiculous. Everyone has seen a shooting movie where someone ends up dead via gun. The reason people go to war with guns is because they kill people.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

yea, but only if you'd kill someone with it. it's a good decoration item!
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

i do not think all guns should be banned, but certainly some. if your a hunter and you want to kill a deer, then go and by a rifle, but do you really need an AK-47 to kill a little deer? and if your buying a gun for protection, then that is just stupid. there are plenty of things you can do before resorting to a gun for protection. get a guard dog, buy an alarm, or move near a place with a lower crime rate. you could also buy a taser or pepper spray.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

First, AK-47s have to be semi automatic to be available for civilian use. Second, dogs are good for protection, but mainly intimidation. (I have a German Shepherd and a Great Pyrenees so I'm NOT saying dogs aren't good for keeping your house safe). A bullet in a dog will stop any breed of dog you have, even if it is a 100lb+ dog. Also, guns are great for protection. If you have a shotgun, a robber that just hears you when you cock it will think "#@$%!" And if it comes to it, a homeowner will normally pull the trigger in self defense (be sure to get him good in the first shot because only the first shot counts as self defense, all the other shots are assault =D). Pepper spray and tasers are do not have the stopping power to save you from a criminal. If s/he is flailing on the ground he can still pull the trigger, and might hit you. Lastly, what has America come to when you have to move your home because of crime rates? If you want to save money, buy a gun and any other form of defense you want.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

but most burgerlery's happen when you arn't even home, in which case the gun is mostly likly to be stolen itself. now a criminal has a gun in his hands
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

That depends on the person, an elderly person or computer nerd, or any other stay at home person, will be at home. Someone with a very active life might not. Secondly, most robberies (42%) take place on the streets. Only 14% of robberies are home invasion, which normally happen between 8:00 PM and 3:00 AM.Opinions/Guesses aren't facts.http://www.villageofshorewood.org/index.asp?Type=B_PR&SEC={2A109E2C- 125D-4C1E-A715-3F26BBF88779}&DE={C34B1308-922E-4A81-BB1B-69B4DE0D64B8}
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Yes, that is certainly going to stop you from a gunman. "Dear God.... Please Save This Soul"
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

People like you are blind when your waiting on your alarm company to alert the police and the three guys who just broke into your home are raping your wife and hurting you family and they just killed your "guard dog" what are you going to be doing? Because I tell you what your not doing "is protecting your family"
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

The second amendment wasnt for people to start killing each other, it was for the creation of the militia. Guns in America, are supposed to keep this world a better place, however, it doesnt do that at all, it only allows criminals to commit crimes. It definetly doesnt protect anyone from anything, it only harms the people of this country. And yea, I get that many people save themselves from the criminals that break into their house or try to rape them, but half the time thats not the case.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: law

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I find is odd all the responses, so far in the debate, have not touched on the main reason, in my mind, why I would never let the law makers take the 2nd amendment away. It's not for the protection of home invaders, it's not for hunting and it's not even for attacks on the street, it's for protection from the powers to be. I believe the MAIN reason we should all support the 2nd amendment is to keep the power of gun ownership in our hands and not in the hands of the government. If all American citizens loose their right to gun ownership the only ones left with the guns are the police.... and this is a scary thought.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

"...it only allows criminals to commit crimes..."REALLY?! That's interesting. Riddle me this: How would one STOP a criminal with a gun who is committing a crime?"...It definetly doesnt protect anyone from anything, it only harms the people of this country."You're joking, right? You don't think peoples lives have been saved because they carry a firearm? Why do you think people choose to carry guns in the first place? Because they want to shoot someone? Let's look at BIG PICTURE, for a moment: GUNS protected the LIFE and LIBERTY and FREEDOM that you now take for granted in this country.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

Riddle me this: How would one STOP a criminal with a gun who is committing a crime?this is why we ban guns isn't it?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

They would shoot the criminal so they can protect themselves, their money, their family, or a friend. Guns are illegally imported from South America every day. Criminals are already breaking the law, what would they care if they just broke one more law?By the way, guns end wars.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

The common counter-argument is:If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

precisely what we are proposing, the fact that all guns will be illegal (aside from certain licenced people) will mean that guns arent allowed and no one has gunsmeaning that the only people with the guns are outlaws and can be dealt with through law