Debate: Is there a right religion or is it OK to just try to be good?
Side: The one true religion is:

Evidence when viewed goes beyond reasonable doubt!Here is some evidence that supports an affirmative verdict regarding many Biblical facts, including the Resurection:1 - The Prophetic Words, and the Biblical Directions of Prophesy, and the Plan, the ultimate bottom line action and goals of Biblical content and Prophesy.2 - Because Biblical History is credible it is a source in support of evidence.3 - Because Biblical Prophesy is credible in its fulfillments it is an even greater source in support of evidence, especially since prophesy is layered, with many separate prophesies having to also come true for one to come true! - Even greater than knitting cells together in evolution!4 - Because eye witness testimony, even outside of the Bible, other documents, Greek and Roman secular offer details confirming the dynamics of Christianity and Persecutions and Martyrdom.5 - The accounts are not contradictions, (as though any were lying) the various times and places of writings actually are a confirmation of reliability, people who lie have fuzzy memories in a week, even with practice and easy communications of our day, lies unravel because even the untrained eye can pick out lies, but that's not the case with the four gospels, they confirm accidentally each other's facts, that show true eyewitness independent works, with different perspectives of the same exact event, as you know since you "read the book" the private investigated discusses this.6 - The degree of insistence on the testimonies of Christians, and it's growth beyond their group, location, and generation. In comparison Muslims were militant from the start, attracting like violent individuals. It would not have the same magnet effect as peaceful Christians fed to lions. One would excell in dominance, like cell selection, the other would be eliminated as passive cells are dominated.7 - The Prophetic Words spoken of concerning the rejection by its "mother religion" and the Prophetic Words stating as Messiah would be rejected, All Nations would hear an exclusive religion, rejected by its originator and accepted world wide!8 - 300 prophesies fulfilled in just the one person Jesus9 - Martyrdom, the ferverency and dedication, they most all went courageously against horrible opposition, and most ultimately died for it. And not in a group drinking poison like Jim Jones, Christians often died or were imprisoned alone and often died gruesome deaths10 - Paul a Jew of Jews, happily killing Christians saw what must have been a hologram! Jesus the Risen Lord knocked him off a horse and blinded him, then sent him to talk to his disciples.Picture this, Saul/Paul had just led a crowd in Stephen's stoning, Saul was unmoved by it, it was something he was gladly a part of. All the Christians knew of Saul, and he scared of them, they feared for their lives.Jesus knocks Saul off of a horse, and disarms him by making him temporarily blind. Probably so the Christians wouldn't fear him when he pulled up on his horse. Jesus made him disabled in killing them, so he couldn't harm them.Jesus sends Saul to get disciples that just saw him murder their friend and brother, Stephen! Now he is there to be saved, healed and filled with the Spirit.Paul goes on to lead the way like a work horse bringing the message of Jesus the Risen Christ to the Gentiles. Saul Jew of Jews - takes on a new name, born again, and brought the gospel out to the Gentiles.So these are 10 pieces of evidence I have and consider as evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt"[Courtesy of debate with Slapshot - The fact that other bios are sometimes written by folks who did not know the subject is moot. Why? Because, say, a bio on FDR has been written by hundreds if not thousands of people. So there is no doubt as to the facts in it, which are easily checkable. And no doubt of course to FDR's existence. And of course a bio on FDR or JFK does not have them performing magical or supernatural feats.With JC, there is precious little written about him by ANY secular sources. And of the few mentions of him there ARE by seculars, NONE of them claim he was a god nor did miracles. Only that, I think in maybe one or two secular accounts, it is mentioned that "some of his followers claim he performed miracles."IOW: outside of your bible, which is filled with preposterous claims of magic, there is scant if not NO evidence that JC was anything close to a god. Thus, when taken as a whole, it appears in all likelihood he was simply another of the dozens of zealous political insurrectionists of his time, who bristled at Roman Occupation.]KNHAV777- They have been historically confirmed the way anything historical has been confirmed!What makes it all the more confirmed is the outside sources!And you mentioned there is no outside sources regarding Jesus performing miracles, then an even greater challenge would be there are no writings saying the claim of miracles to be fraudulent. With the objection, I would think writings stating how not to fall for these lies would be an even greater expectation.After all, the are documented by 4 Gospel writers, and in acts and letters.And Catholocism and Constantine, even though he converted he established Catholocism and killed Christians who resisted Catholicism and beginning Catholocism burned their Bibles and writings, Catholocism wanted to control the populous so only the the Catholic Church had the written Word, hence the Dark Ages. The one sect remained true to the faith, and the Word was a black market item punishable by prison or death. KNHAV777- Even more proof: So, the proof actually is there are NO writings rebutting claims of miracles. There are None rebutting Jesus' miracles, nor the early Christian miracles. Which should be more so in excess from all the opposition from Jews, Romans, and Greeks! They had even more reason to write against claims, then the Christians who already had much documentation of the miracles and Words of Jesus in all the writings we did and do already have as Christians!So thanks, (courtesy of debate with Slapshot) FYI that's now my 11th reason for evidence "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt!"Also there are other sources.  Such as the Darkening from the 6th hour to the 9th. And it was documented to not be a coincidental eclipse. So Reason # 12!We have a documentation stating it, and astronomers confirm there was no eclipse that day. So as the Roman Soldiers said, "Surely He was the Son of God" and if that's the case then of course the Resurection is a God thing to do!