azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

guns dont kill people, people kill people, from a gunsdont kill people i do corperation
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

we would gain nothing from banning guns in america. guns are dangerous when people illegally use them why would we ban guns in america? to stop the violence and all the killings linked to them correct? and if killing people is already illegal what good is it going to do to make guns illegal. If you are willing to kill some one you probably don't care what you are killing then with is legal or not. The only people banning guns in america would hurt are the people that are defending there homes, business's, families. Since guns are already a lucrative black market making them illegal would make it worst. just like banning alcohol did to this nation. look how much money that made the mob it brought them into power. what do you guys think a black market surplus do?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Keep the Guns Change the System

I believe that a ban on firearms in America will result in widespread protests and riots, the gun market will continue, people will no longer feel secure, and an ineffective and possible corrupt system will be created that will only cause America even more suffering. I also believe that anyone who says any type of regulation on firearms is against the 2nd Amendment is quite honestly ignorant of the world we live in now. Even greater regulation than is currently seen is needed on the buying and selling of firearms. I mean really let's be serious here, guns do kill people. But they also protect people. Regulation is needed to ensure that guns begin to do the latter in greater degrees.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Absolutely not. In fact, if we force everyone to carry a .40 s&wthan crime rates will drop dramatically. My question is, as a criminal, will you attempt to kill someone if everyone else in sight is carrying a large handgun? a .40 S&Wis a large handgun, and will drop the toughest people in 3 shots. Something else you must keep in mind is that if we outlaw guns, the only people with guns will be outlaws, this leaves no defense for law abiding citizens. Now on to several specific types of guns these idiots wish to outlaw. Shotgun: A shotgun is not concealable, no one carrying a shotgun is going to get very far before being detained, or with the "shall carry" law, possibly shot. A shotgun does way too much damage for you to carry it into public with positive intents. Anyone who kills a shotgun wielder can get away with the third degree. Next semi auto: semi-auto is used by people wishing to reduce recoil, people hunting with poor aim, or someone who needs self defense. Finally the AK: Someone said you don't need an AK to take out a deer, first of all, the AK is a semi-auto weapon if it is legal. Second, the 7.62x39 shell is considered small for a deer, yes that is right, the AK-47 is a small gun. Third, it is very reliable. People want AK-47s so they can literally bury them in sand when things are peaceful, dig them out, and shoot them when things get bad. Fourth: it is a collectors item. Anyone who supports the banning of guns doesn't know enough about them to make an informed opinion, and isn't willing to learn more, and would rather live in ignorance than try to correct their views. As a side note, all of you tote your numbers. Whether the U.S.A. has the highest gun death rate of all countries, I don't know, many of these numbers are incorrect. Still, if we ban guns, and get every gun off the streets, people will find something else to kill each other with, I could kill someone with a rose if I wanted. Either way, if the U.S.A.'s numbers are as high as you claim it is because you can not kill someone with a gun with a dagger, so instead of going with the dagger, more people go with the gun.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Even if guns are outlawed, they would be smuggled in like any other drug. so outlawing guns won't make much of difference except it will be harder to get guns, besides guns are also used for sports so why ban them?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

I think if u have to ban a gun for ,excuse my language, retards kiling peouple.The goverment should step in and watch better ill postt more later.:)
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

.exeactlyyyy f it wasnt for smelly old retardsssss usingg gunss they way they arent ament to be used then they wouldnttt need to beee banned no wittt am sayingggggg LAD'SSSSSSS!!!!!!
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

aye dee we kno wit yer sayien likeeee (L)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

.gladddd someoneee n'att doesss josieeeee maaa mannoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!xxxxxxxxxxxx
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Ever since the dawn of time mankind has killed each other, Cain killed Abel, he didn't use a gun. Guns are tools, tools for self defense and hunting. Just like cars are tools for driving. Cars don't drive, people drive. Guns don't kill, people kill. Anyhow, cross the border gun selling would still happen. If you make a law to stop people who already brake the law, does that really help? No, it helps the thugs. Because now law abiding American citizens have less protection. Good job hippies, you are making more likely for that pretty lady who lives on your street to get raped, or that wealthy old couple to get robbed.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

guns don't people. people kill people by using guns as a weapon
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

No matter how many gun laws are in effect the only people that will obey them are good law abiding citizens.I am a police officer in PA and we find guns made with wood and pipe a criminal can make a gun for under 2.00.If we ban guns the only people that will be armed are the criminals.It is a fact that murder and violent crime is at a 45 year low and gun ownership is at a all time high.Guns for good guys save lives
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Prohibit guns where appropriate.Do not ban guns when guns are the tools of man.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Guns don't kill...People do.Outlawing guns will only make them popular and worth more money, like Prohibition. People will get rich quick buying and selling under the table. It's like abortion. I'm completely against it. I think it should be considered murder, but I'd rather people murder safely so that the baby and mother don't die.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

if people don't like guns, then don't buy them. I hate rap music, I don't buy any. I don't need to ban it, I just choose not to own it. My having a gun doesn't affect any of my neighbors because I use it legally. It is the criminals you need to worry about and banning guns won't stop them from having them.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

If we look closely, guns don't kill people. People kill people. But there are millions of ways to die and everyday, it is a miracle to stay alive. If guns are taken off the streets, then something is going to replace guns. Instead of a gun, a criminal might threatened me with a bat. Now, should we then ban bats? That is like banning the Yankees and the Red Sox. lol We should not ban guns, but we should limit guns. We should limit guns to the people who can protect us...the law enforcement; police officers; the people that know how to use guns. You can take the guns out of the Mafia. But you cannot take the Mafia out of the crimes. I bet if the Mafia does not have guns, they will still comit crimes.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Guns don't kill people, people kill people.They can use 92% of anything to do it not just guns paper, pen, baseball bat, glass cup, chair, hands,ect. The list goes on forever.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

While you may be right to assert that "guns don't kill people, people kill people," it is pure sophistry to assume that therefore people should carry guns. People do in fact kill people, and they do it a lot easier with the help of guns.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

First of who fires a gun A gun is an object that has no life. People control gunsNow guns in the hands of the public have actually done more good than bad. Libya- People were able to gain guns and over throw a unjust ruler Switzerland- It is by law to have a gun by the time your 21 and be trained with it. They have the lowest crime rate in the world.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Guns are inanimate objects, guns don't have fingers to pull their own triggers and aren't alive so how do guns "kill" people? I am a gun collector, and I have yet to kill anyone with any of my guns.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

I concede that Guns let people kill others. ultimately, people kill people.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

I agree with the fact that guns weapons doesn't kill people they are just a tool that is being use, such knives, or even are hands. The one who is doing the killing is the on handling the weapon the tool.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Guns do not kill people, people do. What would be next? Banning knives? Banning cleaning products? Banning water?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Second AmendmentA well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. deterring tyrannical government; repelling invasion; suppressing insurrection; facilitating a natural right of self-defense; participating in law enforcement; enabling the people to organize a militia system.REALLY SHOULD NOT BE DEBATING THIS, NON NEGOTIABLEshall not be infringed.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

I personally think our government will use this incident with help of the press to take our rights, guns and put martial law in effect. I saw how the press turned the public opinion from one military conflict to another, from baby killers in Vietnam to Hero's in the conflict in Iraq and Afgahanistan. China is holding the loan papers on our country and this is the largest comminist country in the world. I think what one mentally disturbed individual did was horrible and I pray for the children and teachers, The assualt weapon did not kill those people,this could happen with a revolver or a pump shotgun. Please don't let what one sick person did to let our government take our rights away from us.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Any gun control is unconstitutional. So no, guns should not be banned nor should any type of ban be in place.2nd amendment: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall NOT be INFRINGED.any law to limit type of gun used, owned, or banned guns, ammo, magazine size, etc. is by definition INFRINGEMENT of the 2nd amendment because the government is telling its people whats ok and not ok. where in any of that ideology of gun control laws does that spell freedom?once the infringement begins with the 2nd amendment where will it stop? government says movies and video games are to violent and ban them. big macs, soda, and fries make you to fat so we'll ban those. Gun laws and bans are put in place that only affect good law abiding free citizens.Criminals do not follow laws. That is BY DEFINITION a criminal!!! They will steal guns, get them from the black market, or from any illegal shipments from other countries if they have to. Most of these mass shootings happen in so called "gun free zones". where gun control laws prohibit good law abiding citizens from carrying a gun to protect themselves and others. These gun free zones like schools, hospitals, post offices, most government areas, as well as buisnesses and public conventions that post no gun allowed signs, are basically advertising to these criminals, psychos, and mass murders that this will be a easy place to slaughter people because no one can defend themselves!!!how often do you hear of a mass shooting or gun related firefight at a place where there are known 100's of gun carriers like gun shows, police stations, or nra conventions? Because criminals know some people will be packing a gun there and it will not be easy. there are thousands of stories where armed citizens stop criminals, in many cases without firing a shot and just showing the gun. The liberal media today mostly just films the major gun massacres and shootings because its big news, gets peoples attention, ratings, and promotes their agenda for gun control.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Two Societies of 200 random individuals, one with guns and one with no guns. The answer is obvious, a society without guns has less opportunity, risk and danger than a society with guns.In a worldwide population of billions, many would have lived if opportunities to kill with guns had never arisen.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

[event]The society with no guns has five members that buy guns from the black market, they take over the society and create a dictatorship where the men are forced into slave labor camps and the women are sold as sex slaves. Meanwhile the other society is fine they have had a few disputes with a bad apple or two but they were both resolved without the collapse of the society.[/event]coming back to the planet earth you must first accept that guns exist. If you ban them there will still be a black market, no matter if they are smuggled or made domestically. So the best solution is to regulate and make sure law abiding citizens can buy guns.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Yes

Wooowwww such an awesome way to stick that whole situation in the derb derb's face .. LOL
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

I think the whole debate revolves around whether or not you believe people are capable or incapable of behaving properly in the presence of a gun. If you are a conservative you believe people are capable. Progressives (liberals) believe people incapable. To take it further, if I believe you are capable then it's consistent that I demand accountability from you when you choose not the behave properly. There is a basic truth that applies here: Capable is to Accountable as Incapable is to Unaccountable. Before you respond back, consider which Ideology seeks to hold others unaccountable and you have identified those who believe others incapable.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Making guns illegal wouldn't solve anything except to take them away from people that want to defend themselves. Is marijuana legal? No? Then why is it so easy to get a hold of? Banning guns will NOT keep them out of the hands of criminals. If someone wanted to get a gun, they'd find a way.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: law

So, based on your argument there should be no laws since people will always break them?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Remember how Hitler took over Germany single handedly? he registered everyones guns so that he knew where they were and who had them....then took the guns so that the citizens couldn't fight back. The crime rate in Washington D.C. has more than doubled since guns were banned- this is because the people who were committing the crimes didn't get rid of their guns because they dont follow the law!
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

what about the 'RIGHT TO BARE ARMS' ?
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

The 2nd Amendment was created to assure that Americans could protect themselves. Unless every gun is somehow destroyed, there will be no way to ban guns in America.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

the Second Ammendment was created in order to assure that we have the same strength as the government. The ability to overthrow it if shit goes down.The second amendment makes all the other amendments possible.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Please. Do you really think you're going to take on the American military, and all its subsidiary para-military organizations thanks to the "War on Drugs", with your handgun? Citizens have no chance against the government if 'shit goes down'. You're prol-meat if that happens and the second amendment won't do a thing, comma splice and all. The second amendment refers to a time when militia was pulled out of the common populace. If they all have guns, then you don't have to supply them. This is no longer the case.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

You make a legitimate point: the right to bear arms may no longer afford much real protection against would-be despots, and judging from the arguments made in this debate, it may even have lost much of its symbolic value.However, changing our constitution is something we should never take lightly. The 2nd amendment is fundamentally about preventing the government from gaining coercive power. Taking that away in an attempt to make it harder for criminals to commit crimes would fundamentally change what it means to be a US citizen.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

a majority of americans with automatic weapons who wish to rebel can take on the government. not to mention on how many members of these military and paramilitary organizations may actually join in the fight.but it's sad to see people just say (fuck it, if the government becomes totalitarian... w/e, better than the right to arm yourself).and, the handgun is good for when someone breaks into your house and tries to rape your kids. like what almost happened to my uncle (but he used a gun to shoot the fucker in the back of the head).
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

no if you have a guns license
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

as long as people who have guns use they responsibly they should never be banned
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

no guns should not be baned in america and no we should not be able 2 carry fully automatic, but if a person tries to hurt you or your family unless you are a sharpshooter then a single shot wepon will not be good enough to protect you or your family. so a semi-automatic wepon can be good to have around the house.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Just people kill people. Children would not wonder what a gun does if they are exposed to guns and people tell them the proper way to use them. Its the children who are shielded from guns that try to play with them and don't know what to do, that cause trouble.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Even if guns were banned poeple could still make there own guns.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: yes

.if guns were banned things such like amo&thingsused to build guns would be banned to so how could they build their own????? explain that to me NOW
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Maybe in America but its like smuggling marijuana it hapens even though it is illegal here. Criminals would still get gun and weapons no matter what the law.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Should [citizen] guns be banned?- hell no.In an arguement made by T.S. Eggleston, if guns were banned, a black market would arise as well as gun smuggling. This in return would lead to an increase in crime and honestly, who wants more crime? He states that the citizens with no previous criminal records would surrender their guns to officials, leaving them helpless and at a higher risk for being injured.Eggleston further explains that "Criminals will always continue to break the law and prey on the law-abiding but disarmed citizens."For the previous arguements that claim "there are almost no cases where an innocent person has defended themselves with a gun."Thats bull. According to Eggleston and other statistics, "every 13 seconds, an American uses a legal firearm in defense against a criminal."So, for self-protection, guns should remain legal. It prevents overcrowding of prisons, riots, and decreases many injuries. In return health costs are not forced to sky-rocket.To suit the people that believe guns should be completely illegal....I do feel that stricter laws need to be enforced to acquire such equipment.According to the National Rifle Association (NRAILA), in the state of Texas, an individual does not need a permit to buy a hangun, and they are not required to carry registration or a license.This lack of legislation is one of the main reasons for the decrease in gun safety, so if we fix this, Americans can be on their way to a happy, gun legal society.=]http://www.the-eggman.com/writings/gun_ban.html http://www.the-eggman.com/index.phphttp://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/a/gunlaws_tx.htm
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

ok so i think thtas the guns dont kill people kill the guns well they just happen to be in between the people
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

Studies have shown (look at cities in Australia) that when you disarm a population crime rates go up because people no longer have the fear of people defending themselves.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

guns just help people kill each other but its not the guns fault it has no control of its self people choices to use the gun in crime
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

There was a reason we the people created the 2nd ammendment, the right to bear arms. We created it so if the government went tyranical on the people, the people will have a way to defend themsleves and try to overthrow the government. If guns were banned in America, it would leave the citizens helpless against the government.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

of course not it is our right as defined by the constitution to have the right bear arms and pluss do you really wan only people who got there guns illegaly to have them??
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

hell no! guns should definitely not be banned. some people in this country depend on guns to kill animals for food. guns don't kill people. people kill people.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

No, but they should be registered, and concealed weapons and handguns should not be carried in public.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: Regulation purposes

Not banned, but it would be reasonable to restrict and regulate access to guns like in Europe.
Debate: Should guns be banned in America?
Side: No, guns don't kill people.

No because the second amendments says and i quote "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."