azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

I blame both myself an the typos.I haven't seen it.You're point?You blame other people for having problems reading your typos. If you really did blame yourself for your typos I would expect more of an apology.Liars always care.Do you care if I think you are judgmental?
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

I haven't seen it.It is if you understood both the context and the words.You blame other people for having problems reading your typos. If you really did blame yourself for your typos I would expect more of an apology.I don't need to apologise if the person was able to read my typos.I blame myself for making a typo.I don't blame myself for you pretending that you were unable to read it.Do you care if I think you are judgmental?I do, but not for my own sake.Liars care about what other people think because for their own sake.Honest people care about what other people think for other peoples sake.You care due to the former.You were denying that you cared for either the former or the latter.If you deny that you cared for any of the reasons you are a liar.If you denied caring for the former, then you are liar.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

It is if you understood both the context and the words.I will keep a look out for that then.I don't need to apologise if the person was able to read my typos.I know, you asshole. You need to apologize because people weren't able to read with your typos.I don't blame myself for you pretending that you were unable to read it.I wasn't pretending.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Please Cartman, ignore this guy, it's been too long now, and everyone else has left this debate, I'm asking you for your sanity and health, because I care about my allies.Don't listen or respond to this troll anymore (on this debate). Let's move on
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Don't bother, Cartman's downright masochistic. I've tried to convince him, for his own good, to stop trying with SaintNow and Blizzard, but he's a stubborn one.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

Oh man. He is so insanely delusional. He is seeking attention from people that have pledged to not give him any while claiming he isn't a troll. That's like textbook trolling.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Oh man. He is so insanely delusional. He is seeking attention from people that have pledged to not give him any while claiming he isn't a troll. That's like textbook trolling.Well, isn't seeking attention normal in a conversation?I couldn't have a discussion unless I sought attention.It isn't hard to think about.Not that I demand attention from you nor IamSparticus.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

Screw you, hippy.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: Russia

We're worried about you.Why don't you come have a seat so we can all take turns telling you how this affects us?We just want what's best for you.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

We're worried about you.Why don't you come have a seat so we can all take turns telling you how this affects us?We just want what's best for you.Don't worry, he's been warning himself.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Don't bother, Cartman's downright masochistic. I've tried to convince him, for his own good, to stop trying with SaintNow and Blizzard, but he's a stubborn one.What does he want out of me, exactly?That's what I just don't get.I wouldn't say I'm like Saintnow though.Blithering heck, Saintnow is dumb.So is FromWithin.I don't bother with them to.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

Please Cartman, ignore this guy, it's been too long now, and everyone else has left this debate, I'm asking you for your sanity and health, because I care about my allies.Don't listen or respond to this troll anymore (on this debate). Let's move onWell, everybody does leave debates whenever Cartman responds to me.I get you're point about him.I have been asking him to just give it all a rest as well.Not that I'm a troll.
Debate: Which country is better?
Side: USA

I will keep a look out for that then.Hopefully.I know, you asshole. You need to apologize because people weren't able to read with your typos.Yes, they were.It was only the word "of" that was missing, for example.I wasn't pretending.Yeah, right.Why do you bother?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE&feature=related,  enough said
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

FUNNIEST THING EVERmy favourite part:they are asked who should they attack next for terrorism or something like that and they answer things like France, Korea, China etc.They are then showed a world map and asked to put a flag on the country they said they than ALL put flags on Australia even though no-one said that XDI was insulted when they asked "what currncey does the united Kingdom use" and some fucked up fat lady answeres " United Kngdom, whats that?"
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

i know right, brillianti loved the part when the guy didnt know where kfc was from
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

The video wouldn't be nearly as funny if it wasn't selectively edited. The video is edited so that only the dumbest responses appear on the video.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"The video wouldn't be nearly as funny if it wasn't selectively edited. The video is edited so that only the dumbest responses appear on the video."And your american movies dont selectively edit British people so they all end up as ridiculously posh people with no teeth?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

No one here is claiming Hollywood movies are evidence that Americans are superior to Brits.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

just FYI i wasnt actually trying to argue that this makes us better or anything and if you asked enough of the british public then you would eventually come out with the same results.i just thought the video was funny, seriously man you have to relax.and yes it is obvious that they cut it only to the funny ones, thats the point.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

just FYI i wasnt actually trying to argue that this makes us better or anything and if you asked enough of the british public then you would eventually come out with the same results.Whether you meant to or not, this is the perception that others will have.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"No one here is claiming Hollywood movies are evidence that Americans are superior to Brits."then you haven't read the arguments of your fellow americans, I personally have seen several stating "brits have terible teeth"
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Though that was funny it was bull.I would bet you any amount of money that they skipped over quite a few interviews of people who knew basic knowledge, simply keeping the idiots on to further ask them questions that would only embarrass the American people more.The same could be done with England; doing a street interview and asking relatively the same questions to roughly 100 people and finding 7 people who held no basic knowledge of events, currencies, coalitions, and even countries both current and past.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

oh of course. it would be rediculous to think everyone was that stupid and i think there is one which is the same thing but for england.i just saw it and thought it was hilarious!
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

I doubt you would find anyone in our country who didn't know what currency you use, but you could get some really thick people here. Most dumbest kid I know was shown a map of Europe and didn't know where the UK was.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

this just made me laugh and i thought it was relevent so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiKc37mhy58
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

I'm from America, but it is true that England is better. England colonized more than 25% of the world, and was the only country that truly fought on its own in World War 2. England made many new inventions and helped make the world safer.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

I'm from America, but it is true that England is better. England colonized more than 25% of the world, and was the only country that truly fought on its own in World War 2. England made many new inventions and helped make the world safer.First, colonizing countries in the past in not a legitimate argument because the debate is called, " Which country is better - England or U.S.A?" notice the is. Also, England would have been toast if it were not for the supplies from lend lease and eventually troops that America provided.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

" Also, England would have been toast if it were not for the supplies from lend lease and eventually troops that America provided."Lies, there is another debate about this so go tell your junk on there.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

Look, the U.S.A. is not a place you would want to spend your whole life. Many of America's most popuated cities have EXTREMELY high crime rates, at one time they had the highest obesity rate, they are at war CONSTANTLY, they usually elect the worst possible presidents, they have extremely high pollution rates (there are about 2 cars for every person), they have high taxes, and I was born in England!
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

there are about 2 cars for every personActually there are about 0.8 cars per person in the United States
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

England all the way... though american's come up with (reasnobly) good films and i'm loving the sound of new york, England is immense. and that's not just because it's sunny, like 24/7. not.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

It's a broad question, and 'better' is a subjective term which can be defined in many ways.However, the USA is the cause of a lot a death and conflict in the world today, they butcher the English language, and most of the population are blind patriots, for whom any questioning of the greatness of their own country is blasphemy. That is why every in the world hates you.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

However, the USA is the cause of a lot a death and conflictAnd the UK is behind us every step of the way....no?they butcher the English languageAnd what is the distinction between 'butchering a language' and creating a new dialect?most of the population are blind patriots, for whom any questioning of the greatness of their own country is blasphemy.Unfortunately I don't know enough Englishmen to make any kind of comparison. The United States does not have a monopoly on Nationalism.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

And the UK is behind us every step of the way....no?Fair point, but only because of the stronghold that the USA has got on world politics.And what is the distinction between 'butchering a language' and creating a new dialect?The distinction is that the 'dialect' is now more widespread than the original language, not just in the USA but also in the various countries around the world that now learn American English.Unfortunately I don't know enough Englishmen to make any kind of comparison. The United States does not have a monopoly on Nationalism.Fortunately I do, I also lived a year in the States, and about a third of the people in my accommodation are American. I can tell you that blind patriotism is far more prevalent in the USA that in England. However, since I cannot provide any evidence for this other than my own experience; you, of course, maintain the right not to believe me on this point.P.S Could you please tell me how to make text bold.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

Fair point, but only because of the stronghold (stranglehold?) that the USA has got on world politics.nevertheless.The distinction is that the 'dialect' is now more widespread than the original language, not just in the USA but also in the various countries around the world that now learn American English.Which furthers my point.Fortunately I do, I also lived a year in the States, and about a third of the people in my accommodation are American. I can tell you that blind patriotism is far more prevalent in the USA that in England. However, since I cannot provide any evidence for this other than my own experience; you, of course, maintain the right not to believe me on this point.I don't think living a single year in the US qualifies one to judge all Americans. Where exactly did you live, and what was the reason for living there?You can make text bold by putting two asterisks (Ctrl+8) before and after the text you want to bold.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

Which furthers my pointWhat???I don't think living a single year in the US qualifies one to judge all Americans. Where exactly did you live, and what was the reason for living there?I'm more qualified to make a judgement of both parties than you are. Not that's it's relevant, but I travelled all over the country, following roughly in the footsteps of Jack Kerouc, meaning I spent time in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Denver and Los Angeles as well as short spells in various other towns and cities.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"And the UK is behind us every step of the way....no?"That's called helping an ally, unlike what you did in the world wars.You get yourselves into wars we come help you out then you run off leaving us with all the trouble."And what is the distinction between 'butchering a language' and creating a new dialect?"You haven't made any new words you have just shortened them to primitive sounds called "slang" and then forced them onto the rest of the world through "americanism""Unfortunately I don't know enough Englishmen to make any kind of comparison. The United States does not have a monopoly on Nationalism."I have met many "blind patriotic" americans on the internet who have to go as far back as the U.S revolution to find a war that they won on their own.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

That's called helping an ally, unlike what you did in the world wars. Yes because, The billions of dollars in war materials, food, equipment, and funding you got from us (before we even entered the war) and the 4 million soldiers we sent to help fight your war...didn't help at all.Don't be so arrogant.You get yourselves into wars we come help you out then you run off leaving us with all the trouble.When has this ever happened?You haven't made any new wordsBS does not even begin to describe this statement. Americans have literally invented hundreds if not thousands of words. We use different words to describe the same things, and we use different spellings, which are not always shorter. This is called a dialect.English is an Amalgamation of German, French, and Latin words and the English you speak today is a corruption of middle English. It is composed of many corruptions of words originating from other languages.Example: England from Angle-land.Slang is made of short-lived words used by distinct groups of people. The very fact that all Americans have used these words for over a hundred years means it isn't slang.I have met many "blind patriotic" americans on the internet who have to go as far back as the U.S revolution to find a war that they won on their own.The internet is not representative of all people. If I were to make conclusions based on my experiences on the internet then Ron Paul should have won the last presidential election and that atheists and agnostics are now the majority.And the last war that the United States won without any aid, was the Spanish American war, as far as memory serves me. Not that this means anything, wars are very expensive and bloody, having allies can reduce these burdens, from a military standpoint it makes absolutely no sense to go into a fight alone, unless you have to.By the same right, I have met very few Brits on the internet that did not think their country the greatest.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"Yes because, The billions of dollars in war materials, food, equipment, and funding you got from us (before we even entered the war) and the 4 million soldiers we sent to help fight your war...didn't help at all.Don't be so arrogant."In today's world if a country owes you money you have power over them, you cant honestly say you people did it without the intention of making a profit, also you only sold us food because your farmers produced too much, same goes for all your other mass-produced goods."When has this ever happened?"Iraq, the war we(Britain) are fighting now."BS does not even begin to describe this statement. Americans have literally invented hundreds if not thousands of words. We use different words to describe the same things, and we use different spellings, which are not always shorter. This is called a dialect.English is an Amalgamation of German, French, and Latin words and the English you speak today is a corruption of middle English. It is composed of many corruptions of words originating from other languages.Example: England from Angle-land."I know how my country's language was formed ."Slang is made of short-lived words used by distinct groups of people. The very fact that all Americans have used these words for over a hundred years means it isn't slang."So you copied our language and to individualise yourselves chose to only use the worst parts, you then proceed to force this language onto us, via the media. in other words butchering our language.The last point you made I have researched it and realised you're correct, my mistake.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

In today's world if a country owes you money you have power over them, you cant honestly say you people did it without the intention of making a profit,Of course we made a profit from it, but that doesn't negate the fact that it helped your country when it desperately needed it. So don't go claiming we didn't help you, when we obviously did.also you only sold us food because your farmers produced too much, same goes for all your other mass-produced goods.And guess what? There are about 250 to 350 other counties we could have sold it to.Iraq, the war we(Britain) are fighting now.I don't know if you've been watching the news (or maybe that is the problem) but we are still in Iraq. We never left. We have about 48,000 American troops in Iraq at this moment. Guess how many British troops are in Iraq? Go ahead guess! There are as of spring 2010, 150 british troops in Iraq.Let me repeat that: 150 british troops in Iraq. That's 150 British troops, to our 48,000 troops. Your statement was utterly absurd to the greatest degree.I'm sorry, who is fighting the Iraq war again?
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

"Of course we made a profit from it, but that doesn't negate the fact that it helped your country when it desperately needed it. So don't go claiming we didn't help you, when we obviously did."you sold us food thats not really helping."And guess what? There are about 250 to 350 other counties we could have sold it to."Yet after the war you realised no-one would buy your food and you went into a depression."I'm sorry, who is fighting the Iraq war again?"point taken, i mucked up
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: U.S.A!

you sold us food thats not really helping."Rationing was introduced into Britain at the tale end of World War One - in February 1918. Rationing was introduced in response to an effective U-boat campaign and during World War One, the Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) was used to ensure that food shortages never occurred.One of the primary aims of DORA, when it was first introduced, was to prevent food shortages. At the start of the war, food shortages were self-imposed as the German U-boat campaign had yet to start. However, at the start of the war people went around panic buying food and hoarding it at home. Some shops sold out of food in days in August 1914. However, after the initial panic buying, people settled down into a routine and food was not a problem until the end of 1916.Britain continued to import food during the war. The main exporters to Britain were America and Canada. This meant that merchant ships had to cross the Atlantic Ocean. Up to 1916, these merchant ships could travel in relative safety. However, in 1917, the Germans introduced unrestricted submarine warfare and merchant ships were sunk with great frequency. This had a drastic impact on Britain's food supply and with great losses in the Atlantic, food had to be rationed so that no-one starved in Britain. In April 1916, Britain only had six weeks of wheat left and bread was a staple part of most diets. 1916 was a bleak year for families - with the news from the Battle of the Somme and with food in short supply, suddenly the war was brought home to most families. Food prices rose and by October 1916, coal was in such short supply that it was rationed by the number of rooms a family had in its house.The restrictions introduced by DORA failed and the government then tried to introduce a voluntary code of rationing whereby people limited themselves to what they should eat. The standard was set by the Royal Family. However, this did not work. Those who worked in the munitions factories did not have enough food while anyone with money could get more than enough food on the black market. Any area that could grow food was converted to do so - gardens were turned into allotments and chickens etc. were kept in back gardens.The powers introduced by DORA empowered the government to take over land when it felt that it was necessary to do so. In 1917, the government took over 2.5 million acres of land for farming. By the end of the war, Britain had an extra three million acres of farming land. Those who would have usually worked the land - young men - had been called up, so the work was done by the Women's Land Army. Conscientious objectors also worked on the land. "http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/rationing_and_world_war_one.htm Yet after the war you realised no-one would buy your food and you went into a depression.I assume you are talking about the end of WWI, after which The Dust Bowl in the early 1930's destroyed 97 million acres of farmland. The stock market crash of 1929 is usually credited as the cause of the Great Depression but the Dust Bowl certainly didn't help.History, is not your strong point.
Debate: Which country is better - England or U.S.A?
Side: ENGLAND!

I know my own countries history thank you. "Britain continued to import food during the war. The main exporters to Britain were America and Canada"We did all the hard work though, when german u-boats started we had to defend the imports with our own navy some help from you would have been nice.All you've really done is copy+pasted something from the website which supports my side of the debate-Britain is clearly better as we can cope with war, where as you can't."I assume you are talking about the end of WWI, after which The Dust Bowl in the early 1930's destroyed 97 million acres of farmland. The stock market crash of 1929 is usually credited as the cause of the Great Depression but the Dust Bowl certainly didn't help." I know of all these other factors but you can't deny that if you had been able to sell your food to us your chances ofdepression would have shrunk enormously."History, is not your strong point."No, it isn't but it doesn't mean that you know more than I do.