azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

I should point out that as the instigator of the question its your job to establish a basis, not ours.Anyway, I apologize if I in anyway have contributed to off topic-ness, however I wasn't the one who made the off topic arguments, I simply responded to them.BACK ON TOPIC; ;]I'd say that the preposition that the media is Pro-Gay is under the same label as people who claim the media is trying to brainwash everyone to worship Marx and Stalin. It simply isn't based in reality. Although I think one reason you may see what you see is because in most shows, representing reality, let's say you have four main relationships.3 are straight.1 is gay.I don't think you can say that all of the straight relationships are promiscuous like your saying, but a few probably are. I know that in all the shows I watch [I'm a MAJOR ABC, Fox, CBS, NBC show fan...a bit to much ;] ] that the heterosexual couples are usually presented as being fairly stable, and yes every now and then [I'd say 30-35%] are more promiscuous. But that's cause they have numerous heterosexual couples to play around with and only one gay couple.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

I did establish a basis. I put forth what I saw and that was the basis for my question. I could be mistaken. But I would be naive if I thought media was unbiased. Everyone has a point of view they bring to the table; a way in which they see the world. Therefore every form of communication is an effort in some way to get others to see the world as you do. Or to put another way, if you think something is good and true you will promote it. It could be Marxism, Atheism or homosexuality. And I think you should promote it. But, I think an idea should stand or fall based on it's merits. It should not be propped up by coercion and intimidation.So to answer the question " Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestyle?" Of course it does, along with a whole host of other things. That's what media does and that's the whole point of advertising. The real question is the value of the goods being sold. I think it's rubbish, therefore I'm not buying. I want something better.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

Question; Does the positive portrayal of heterosexual relations 'promote' heterosexuality?And then you remember that every major physiological, sociological and psychiatrist association agrees that being Gay, or Straight, Or Bi, Or Trans or Asexual is just a natural variation of human sexuality that someone has no control over. It's like trying to promote being black or white."Everyone has a point of view they bring to the table; a way in which they see the world."True, true. But TV shows are made by hundreds of people. ;]
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

To answer your question; Yes, of course it does.About those professionals, I guess you are not aware of all the controversy about such claims. Turns out that those claims are driving by an agenda and not the science. In short, the evidence doesn't support the claim. But don't take my word for it, check it out for yourself. It's not an airtight case like you assume. To your last point; Yep, they sure are. But the real question is which one corresponds to reality? Or to put it another way, which one gives an accurate portrayal of reality and promotes the good, true and beautiful?
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Media tries to sell itself

Hollywood is in the business of promoting Hollywood. It's there to try to sell itself, because if it doesn't do that, it loses money.Making money means catching all the niche markets. Because everybody belongs to a niche market, it's simply that the nature of that niche varies from person to person. Hollywood has a vested interest in portraying niche markets in a positive light. Ergo, if you want to sell to the homosexual market, make them look good because everybody likes to look good. Marketing is a huge thing in the media. Giving a good example, have you noticed the predominance of Goths in mainstream media lately? Somebody picked up on the fact that Goths like to see Goths on TV, and suddenly Abby is making NCIS shine. It makes them money. The same holds true of the portrayal of homosexual relationships. I have lesbian friends who have not only watched every episode of "The L Word", they've bought into every piece of merchandise they could find that even vaguely relates to the show.I don't believe that Hollywood is intentionally promoting homosexuality to the detriment of heterosexuality, I think that in attempting to secure their hold over that section of their market, they are simply loathe to portray it in a negative light for fear of losing their grip.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: eat popcorn

Hollywood promotes the selling of popcorn. Homosexuals eat popcorn. But only homosexuals can eat popcorn happily, healthfully and very very normally. Heterosexuals eating popcorn are sad, pathetic,dysfunctional and plagued with social disorders, and they most likely only eat popcorn with a one-night stand.Its all part of the lifestyle.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

Of course they would why wouldn't they?I mean Hollywood makes everything seem right? Right?!Not only the government also Hollywood make Homos look like its a perfectly good thing.Hollywood promotes drugs.Homosexuality is false no one is "Gay" they just try to act like it or think like a "gay" person. No human is "gay" no one is born "gay".It's usually a symptom of depression and being "gay" would be some type of way to comfort themselves or to make themselves "feel better".I guarantee you no "gay" person is ever happy they just act like it and if you are "gay" 'and post a dispute saying your happy your a liar.I've known "gays" on their death-bed who were unhappy with their life still!Being gay is a very emotional and physical problem.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

Lol. Kay. But I'm quite happy. My friends accept me. My family accepts me. Most people are moving to accepting me, as I am. ;] So you know more about me and my life over the internet than I know about myself? -Bows- Oh great master, what sayeth you about global warming and genocide? (;-;)A little reading for you;http://www.apa.org/topics/sexuality/orientation.aspx http://www.psych.org/Departments/EDU/Library/APAOfficialDocumentsandRelated/PositionStatements/197310.aspx  ( This was all the way back in 1973 ;O ]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7456588.stm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior http://www.thestar.com/living/article/754538--two-moms-are-as-good-as-a-mom-and-a-dad-study "Dr Qazi Rahman, a lecturer in cognitive biology at Queen Mary, University of London, said that he believed that these brain differences were laid down early in foetal development."As far as I'm concerned there is no argument any more - if you are gay, you are born gay," he said. "
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

That is sickening.It's just an excuse for gay people to be gay.It's the same as saying violent people are born violent. agrophobes are born with agrophobia.There may be small development of faggotry when you're born.. but it's the rest of your life that influences your sexuality.In some people the desire to be a sickfuck is crushed if they've been raised well. In others it grows because of their life experiences.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

Lol...the idiocy of your argument lies in the constant insults you feel the need to use in order to prop it up.I'd get mad, but then I remember that your part of the small minority of people now. ;]Also, many people are born with genetic defects such as being predispositioned to being violent, or to phobias. Being gay is no more a genetic defect than being straight, black or female is however. It's a characteristic, just like any of those things. And I'm glad I got you to admit that people are born gay, even if you backtracked and said it was just a 'small part'. ;]Also, would you mind giving me some facts? All the organizations I've listed you represent the vast majority of the worlds physiological and sociological communities. Want me to list more? I can get you some links to the Canadian physiological association...or perhaps the European Union Commission on sexuality? All first rate medical organizations. Your insistence on denial is like me denying gravity.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

I don't need links. Sure I can go on the internet and find some. But I'm not out here to prove something which we all know is wrong -right.Nobody is born gay. Some people are born so that becoming gay is easier. There's a difference. If they are raised right - then their faggotry can be supressed and they can live the lives of normal people, without their birth defect. It is NOT the same as being of a certain race. It is NOT a characteristic. Don't make it something it isn't. It's a disease. Like HIV. Instead of treating it, we're negotiating with it.Don't worry - I'm still not the small minority yet. Once I am, you'll be sure to know that the world will soon be coming to an end.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

Lol...so I'm suppose to take your ramblings as fact? Sorry, but I don't intend to do so, so your refusal to provide any facts makes you loose all credibility. Your ramblings about sexuality, something you know very little about, are the same as me denying gravity in the face of all fact. ;]
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Diversity is NOT a curse

I highly doubt you are, I majored in psychology.So those "reference" sites are nothing new to me, I've seen them before and they all say the same crap because well because, it's obvious they support disruptive behavior.Ok, so if being gay is a "birth defect" or a mental problem..let me ask you this?They have AN (Alcoholics Anonymous) for people with drinking problems. They have NA (Narcotic Anonymous) for people abusing drugs.These are government programs to help people with their specific problem, am I correct?So if they have those for people who have "Problems" maybe they should have ones for people who think they are "gay".HA: Homosexuals Anonymous?I'm only going by what evidence you gave me in these sites and by my own beliefs.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

Yes, you are right we are all born with a whole host of predispositions. And becoming an adult and growing to adulthood means that you learn to control them and suppress them when necessary. It's called adulthood. To act on every whim with out control is known as childish.Also, I noticed a lot of "me's" in your comment. It sounds as if you care more about yourself than others. By that I mean; it means more to you what others think of you than how you make others feel. Just my observation from what you wrote. And self-absorption is a characteristic of childhood.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

Some great and recent-ish movies I've seen that focus on homosexuality: My Own Private Idaho - Mike dies/will probably die; Boys Don't Cry - Brandon and Lana die; Brokeback Mountain - Jack dies; Bent - everyone dies. I feel like a part of Hollywood associates homosexuality with drugs, promiscuity and death, while another (more popular) part depicts homosexuals as hilarious hairdressers and fashion-forward best friends.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

Most movies are heterosexual, so, the homosexual lifestyle is hardly promoted. This is 2015 and there are very few movies up to now that have promoted homosexuality.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

Promote? No.Display? Sure. Same as heterosexual lifestyles.
Debate: Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestlye?
Side: Increasingly so Yes

Does Hollywood promote the homosexual lifestyle? Hello:And, if it did, what of it?? The heterosexual lifestyle is certainly promoted. If you don't like it, use the on/off button.. If that's not good enough, don't see that move or read that book.. excon
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

My opinion is, that twitter is something celebrities use. I've tried twitter and it sucks. The only thing you can do, is telling the world the pointless things you are up to, and guess what. Nobody reads it. So actually its a boring diary update.Facebook fits everyone. Gamers, chatters, status updaters, likers and even anti socials :) you can make yourself completely private on facebook (I'm sure you can do so at twitter too :p )But what I'm trying to say is, that facebook is like.. satisfying (if I can use that world) a bigger amount of people, than twitter does.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

Well, you can write longer, and still follow people. Twitter is crap, you are limited far more than fb.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

I have little use for either but I see zero use for Twitter unless you are a celebrity/politician or care what those types have to say which I don't.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

Face book i mean twitter is crap and face book has games and you can talk
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

To socially communicate with one another Facebook is better for the following reasons:1) There is no 'chat' on Twitter.Facebook chat enables people to talk to their friends with the knowledge that nobody else can see it. This means that people talk quite freely with one another without the risk of others rejecting their conversations as spam (because others can't see their conversations).Twitter doesn't have chat, and because of the format and the fact that people don't have friends, it would actually serve as a disadvantage, and therefore the fact that the format of Twitter cannot have chat by default, means that Twitter is at a disadvantage to Facebook.Facebook is better because it has the chat option.2) Groups on Facebook allow people to stay in contact easier.If I ever leave a school, group, job, or something like that, and I want to stay in contact with the people there, then Facebook is a better medium to do that. You can start groups, pages, and speak to the people who you have left through the option listed in the above point. Twitter has no such option and the lack of this means that people who wish to stay in contact with one another find a deficiency in what they are looking for. If people cannot stay in contact with one another after they leave a certain place then what is the purpose of a social networking site?Facebook is better because it is easier to stay in contact with people.3) Facebook is more widely used.The purpose of a social networking site is to stay in contact with people whom you would otherwise lose contact with without finding another method. The idea is to make staying in contact easier. Without this there is a huge flaw in the network. Twitter has this huge flaw. Whereas with Facebook almost everyone you meet will have an account, with Twitter that is not always the case. In certain sorts of jobs, for example the media, people are more likely to have Twitter than if they have less publically-demanding careers. This means that although with Facebook people will almost always have an account registered, that is not the case with Twitter.Facebook is better because more people use it, and therefore it is more successful in staying in contact with people.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

I love Facebook! ;)
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

I use facebook more than twitter, I really like the interface of this social network, and the worldwide network of users is very large. However, phoodle currently facebook has a page that leaks user information, even tracking and I think this problem should be eliminated.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

QtQuick framework provides a way to render multiple views in the form of a 3D scene.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

Facebook VS Twitter is an online game created by Zynga Inc. It is also one of the most popular games that are available on Zynga's social networks. I prefer to get https://www.propainterswhangarei.co.nz/ and learn more new things about roof painting. This game can be played on Facebook, Myspace and Twitter. Facebook VS Twitter is a very popular topic. Whether you're a Facebook user, a Twitter user or someone who just likes to join the conversation, we've got you covered with this article.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

Facebook and Twitter are two of the most popular social media platforms on the la times crossword planet. They both offer a lot of features and capabilities, but which one is the best for your business?
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

Facebook is great for small businesses that want to connect wordle with their customers and build relationships. It's easy to use and has a wide range of features, including pages, events, and articles. Additionally, Facebook is very user friendly, making it a perfect platform for new or first-time users.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

I would say that it really depends upon who you are and whether you have something to promote or not. Far more people follow on Twitter than subscribe on Facebook, so I think that Twitter is better for promoting things - that may even be yourself.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

Why would you downvote that?
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

In my opinion fb is a social networking site that is more effective in connecting people with their friends and surroundings. while on twitter it is more to follow people especially your icons and celebs. It isn't effective in connecting you with your friends!...what say guys?
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

I've always had a fondness for candy corn. Candy corns are completely different from the corn we eat on our Thanksgiving table.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

Twitter! (: I used to LOVE Facebook but, too many fake and phony's. Plus them 'Facebook famous' people are a joke to me. Twitter all the way!
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

Twitter is the sure way to have your messages lost somewhere between the Hindu's religious pictures of their gods and also of their college friends.Twitter promised several times that will make adjustments to make easy the search of topics and never happened.It's just entertainment but I truly don't like Twitter.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

This post has really impressed me, and this site always offers great news. Thank you for writing such a fascinating article. Keep up the good work! I enjoy playing io games and wordle on the wordle website in my leisure time. How about you?
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

This post has really impressed me, and this site always offers great news. Thank you for writing such a fascinating article. Keep up the good work! I enjoy playing io games and wordle on the wordle website in my leisure time. How about you?
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

helix jump is a fun-addicting 3D game can help you kill time, you can always open this game and have a good time.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

If you missed out on the early bird registration, don’t worry. You can still get into our conference!
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

Both Twitter and Facebook are shell shockers social media platforms that allow users to share and interact with other people. However, there are some key differences between the two. For starters, Facebook is much more popular than Twitter. This is because Facebook is much easier to use and has a much wider range of functions.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Facebook

f you want to develop safety application for your business, it is very important to understand what a safety program is.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

Facebook and Twitter are two of the most popular social media sites competing with each other. Here you check this https://www.aucklandgutter.co.nz/ and get more new ways for construction. Not only they compete, but they also help users to find solutions to their problems or simply share what's on their minds with other people.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

Personally, I love Facebook more because it's easy to use, can freely share my wordle uk to everyone. In general, it is also a habit of using. Twitter is a big social networking platform but I'm used to Facebook so I love it more.
Debate: Facebook VS Twitter
Side: Twitter

i just perfer twitter because of the free drama too watch and usually good art and shit. i dont use fb much because most of the post i see are just dead memes and some family pics. so i usually just use twitter.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

also if graphics did matter why are there so many good games with bad graphics?
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

One word: Minecraft.Minecraft is one of the most fun and all around best games out and its main characteristic is its awful graphics.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

I say no however certain games like fps's need graphics to a certain extent.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

No, the best games that have ever existed were ASCII games. Roguelike and roleplaying MUDS. Graphical games of the modern age have an appeal for a short while until you get tired of the repetitive animations and suddenly a huge void grows inside you longing for something more. Old text based MMO's and ascii games that use words to describe things allow for mental imagery to come into play and your imagination will always keep you entertained. Also, the current best game of all time "Diablo 1" is really just an isometrical graphical rendition of Rogue. With largely the same concept.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

I was going to join yes and say that graphics do matter. for the simple reason that there needs to some visuals (graphics, of any quality being those visuals) but because this is about the quality then I'll go with no.No because its the quality of the story, the game play, the experience that matter. imagine packman with incredible graphics. its hard to imagine that it would have the same effect as the old original simple one. graphics matter only if the game itself is good.take the same game. one with worse graphics and one with better if nothing else is different and the game benefits from having better graphics then yes have you fancy graphics if not then have the worse graphics.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

People play old school games all of the time and no one cares. Graphics aren't the only component. There's stuff like storyline, difficulty, game-play, controls, whether or not you can play online, genre, creativity, player freedom, maps, popularity, popular online gaming, etc. And graphics matter very little as long as there's color and you can see what everything is.Old school games can be good. The old Pokemon games are still played by a lot of people, as well as the old Mortal Combat and Legend of Zelda.Mine Craft has terrible graphics and it's considered a good game by a lot of people. What your saying is BS. As long as it's not an old, text based, MUD game, it's graphics can be pretty bad and be sufficient.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

No. Don't get me wrong, I love good graphics. And now everything is graphically clear and bright. However you don't need good graphics for a good game. Like Zelda the Ocarina of time, or Bomber man, or any of the older games like that. Or even minecraft, which is more modern. Sucky graphics. Yet a good game (depending on who you ask)