azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

There are many free actions, and amendments are used to allow actions, not thoughts. No one can punish you for your thoughts.It is possible to punish anyone because of their thoughts.It may not be right, but it is perfectly possibly.It has happened many times before.No full action is completely free, if you can find any, it is rare.The amendments are used to cover peoples right to their own thoughts.I didn't say thatNor does the constitution.There is a surprising amount of people who have weird equipment in their possession. Find a shady person who will let you use theirs.What type equipment is used for abortions?How do you perform abortions correctly and precisely, especially without causing harm? How can you perform an abortion without medical practice?Anywhere I guess.In the streets?You don't have to buy the equipment to use it.Then who would let you operate the equipment without paying them?Even dealers like their money.Nope.Really?How many people does it take to watch one person?One.How many people does it take to watch three?One.Depending on the methods used.Camera's, reading emails, reading mail, listening to phone conversations.Having security cameras installed.Frequent helicopter surveillance and other flight surveillance, etc.Frequent scanning of products.Frequent police presence.Frequent check up's of companies and employees.Frequent employment of agents used to garner information from circles of peopleand send the information back to the authorities.Perfectly possible.That doesn't make the abortion impossible to do.It decreases the likelihood.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

It is possible to punish anyone because of their thoughts.It may not be right, but it is perfectly possibly.It has happened many times before.When did it happen?No full action is completely free, if you can find any, it is rare.The amendments are used to cover peoples right to their own thoughts.You keep saying these things, but with no reasoning.Nor does the constitution.So, why did you say it did?What type equipment is used for abortions?How do you perform abortions correctly and precisely, especially without causing harm? How can you perform an abortion without medical practice?You can find out how to do anything on the internet. You can also get someone to help you.In the streets?If you are fast enough.Then who would let you operate the equipment without paying them?Even dealers like their money.It becomes affordable when you don't have to buy it. If you rent it you still pay money, but not as much as you asserted previously.Really?Yep.One.How many people does it take to watch three?One.Depending on the methods used.Camera's, reading emails, reading mail, listening to phone conversations.Having security cameras installed.Frequent helicopter surveillance and other flight surveillance, etc.Frequent scanning of products.Frequent police presence.Frequent check up's of companies and employees.Frequent employment of agents used to garner information from circles of peopleand send the information back to the authorities.Perfectly possible.That doesn't sound possible at all. You are talking about employing millions of people simply for surveillance.It decreases the likelihood.I am sorry, but my dictionary doesn't say that impossible means less likely.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

When did it happen?How many times has it been applied by religion?Think about all the religions that punish people for their thoughts.You keep saying these things, but with no reasoning.Will you provide any?You can't push the conversation beyond the stage it is at.So, why did you say it did?Why do you ask?You can find out how to do anything on the internet. You can also get someone to help you.A trained doctor to help you?A trained doctor can help you when trained doctors no longer perform abortions?You may be able to read how to use a fire-arm on the internet, doesn't mean you have the training nor the honed intuition to use them safely and accurately.It is al about training.If you are fast enough.Heavy equipment being quickly employed on the streets?It becomes affordable when you don't have to buy it. If you rent it you still pay money, but not as much as you asserted previously.If you can't buy something, the prices for renting something could go up.Black markets pay a greater price once something becomes illegal.Yep.Positive?That doesn't sound possible at all. You are talking about employing millions of people simply for surveillance.Millions of people are employed to do just that.The people who are put in charge of these roles could merely have increased shifts and greater roles within their jobs.We don't need millions more employed to fill that role.We have almost the millions we need to do that task already.I am sorry, but my dictionary doesn't say that impossible means less likelyThe fact that you want something to be impossible as opposed to unlikely suggests something wrong.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How many times has it been applied by religion?Think about all the religions that punish people for their thoughts.They don't though. They only ever threaten punishment.Will you provide any?You can't push the conversation beyond the stage it is at.I constantly provide you exactly why I said what I said.A trained doctor to help you?A trained doctor can help you when trained doctors no longer perform abortions?They don't have to be trained in order to succeed, and you haven't eliminated trained doctors from doing it outside of hospitals.You may be able to read how to use a fire-arm on the internet, doesn't mean you have the training nor the honed intuition to use them safely and accurately.It is al about training.If you practice enough, you don't need training.Heavy equipment being quickly employed on the streets?If you are talented.If you can't buy something, the prices for renting something could go up.Black markets pay a greater price once something becomes illegal.It is going to still be affordable. That's all I need to show. They can't raise the price too high or no one will buy it. It is still a capitalist system.Positive?Absolutely.Millions of people are employed to do just that.The people who are put in charge of these roles could merely have increased shifts and greater roles within their jobs.We don't need millions more employed to fill that role.We have almost the millions we need to do that task already.We don't have millions of people doing surveillance right now. You want to massively increase what is watched and who is watched. It's not possible.The fact that you want something to be impossible as opposed to unlikely suggests something wrong.I agree that me wanting something that you said could be impossible to be impossible instead of unlikely makes you wrong for having said it.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

They don't though. They only ever threaten punishment.Mankind have certainly been made to suffer because of their thoughts due to religion. Think about all the people who have been punished for merely having different beliefs. Think about all the people who have emotional relationships being punished by religion that didn't approve of these emotional relationships.Think about all the people who expressed having feelings for things that were deemed outside religions boundaries, they have been punished for it, think of all the demonising of people who had certain feelings for things, certain interests in things. People being labelled as witches, people being burned for demon possession.Think of all the ostracism that has occurred.Think of all the people who had feelings, thoughts and believes that were counter to communism, think of all the people being regarded as traitors of state merely due to having different beliefs.Think again.I constantly provide you exactly why I said what I said.So do I.They don't have to be trained in order to succeed, and you haven't eliminated trained doctors from doing it outside of hospitals.Why wouldn't you need training in order to manage an abortion?Performing abortions requires precise hand-eye coordination, doesn't it?And what would happen if all of those trained doctors pass away?No more trained doctors would be able to replace them in the future if it has been made illegal.If you practice enough, you don't need training.Who could train them?If you are talented.Yeah, I suppose a group of super-strong men could be employed to carry round the heavy equipment needed for an abortion.I suppose they would need to be pretty athletic too.They would cost even more to hire.It is going to still be affordable. That's all I need to show. They can't raise the price too high or no one will buy it. It is still a capitalist system.They can't raise the price too low either or they may not be paid enough in relation to the cost of providing an abortion.Absolutely.Let's see.We don't have millions of people doing surveillance right now. You want to massively increase what is watched and who is watched. It's not possible.How many people are in the police force?How many people are in the MI6, MI5, GCHQ?CIA, NSA etc?I agree that me wanting something that you said could be impossible to be impossible instead of unlikely makes you wrong for having said it.I didn't say executing women who have abortions alone would make it impossible.There would have to be other factors needed as well in order to make it impossible.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

didn't approve of these emotional relationships expressed having feelings for things that were deemed outside religions boundaries certain feelings for things, certain interests in thingsAll of your examples involve actual actions taken, not thoughts. That's what I am talking about.So do I.Wow, you are completely delusional.Why wouldn't you need training in order to manage an abortion?Performing abortions requires precise hand-eye coordination, doesn't it?And what would happen if all of those trained doctors pass away?No more trained doctors would be able to replace them in the future if it has been made illegal.Please read my previous argument.Who could train them?Who would need to train the people who don't need training? What?Yeah, I suppose a group of super-strong men could be employed to carry round the heavy equipment needed for an abortion.Or, put it on wheels and have normal people push it around.They can't raise the price too low either or they may not be paid enough in relation to the cost of providing an abortion.You don't even understand your argument here, do you?How many people are in the police force?How many people are in the MI6, MI5, GCHQ?CIA, NSA etc?Thousands.I didn't say executing women who have abortions alone would make it impossible.There would have to be other factors needed as well in order to make it impossible.Nothing you have proposed is possible.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

All of your examples involve actual actions taken, not thoughts. That's what I am talking about.The only actions taken would involve people talking about those thoughts, if you mean actions.Wow, you are completely delusional.Looks like you are going back to what you are like when the chill pills wear off.Looks like you're going to need another "chill pill",lol.Please read my previous argument.Read mine:Why wouldn't you need training in order to manage an abortion?Performing abortions requires precise hand-eye coordination, doesn't it?Who would need to train the people who don't need training? What?What if those doctors passed away, who else would need training?Or, put it on wheels and have normal people push it around.How could you move those wheels around quick enough?Costs money, still.The best thing one could do is have the whole abortion in a van.You don't even understand your argument here, do you?Are black markets able to afford abortions in the same way that a stated funded practice can?Thousands.How many people are in public sector compared to the private sector?Let's devise a formula for this.An equation.So we have private/public so far.Nothing you have proposed is possible.Well, I can't imagine it all happening in a month, put it that way.It's all theoretical, of course.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I am sorry, but I can no longer engage in a conversation with someone who isn't going to put any thought into what they write.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I am sorry, but I can no longer engage in a conversation with someone who isn't going to put any thought into what they write.Yet you haven't put any thought into what you have wrote.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How would you know? You don't even know what you are talking about. How the hell would you have any clue what I am talking about?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How would you know? You don't even know what you are talking about. How the hell would you have any clue what I am talking about?Come up with a formula that describes the amount of profit as opposed to the cost of setting up an abortion for the person offering the abortion.What is the mathematic formula for it?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Why should I? What are you trying to prove with this formula? I think you don't even know.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Why should I? What are you trying to prove with this formula. I think you don't even know.You said that if abortion is made illegal then black markerts would still offer abortions.I am trying to prove that black markets would not be able to afford abortions.Can you provide a mathematical formula that describes the cost of an abortion to a dealer and the profit they would have?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

It would cost $200 and they could charge $300. That's $100 profit.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How do you know that it would cost $200 and that they would charge $300 dollars?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

What do you think it would cost? $20 to clean the equipment$60 for the trained professional$100 to maintain the equipment$20 to rent a place to do it in
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

$20 to clean the equipmentWhat different chemicals would you need to clean abortion equipment?$60 for the trained professionalI suppose training depends on how much an individual is willing to be paid.$100 to maintain the equipmentWhat products would be needed to maintain the equipment?$20 to rent a place to do it inIndoors or outdoors, this depends.So our formula is C + P + M + PC = cleaning products.P = trained professional.M = maintenance toolsP = Place to rent
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

So, you figured it out. What's the problem?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Somewhat, we still have to know what sort cleaning products would be useful to clean abortion equipment.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Probably just alcohol. So maybe $5 instead of $20. Those sneaky black market people.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You do need me to tell you what is rude because you have no fucking clue.You mean "don't"?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How are you ever going to learn what is rude of I don't tell you?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

How are you ever going to learn what is rude of I don't tell you?I've already learned what respect is all about.I don't need you telling me, rascal.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Rude and respect and different things.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Rude and respect and different things.They sure are.I know all about respect and disrespect, aka rudefulness.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Haha. You don't know what AKA means.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Haha. You don't know what AKA means.Picking on peoples choices of words as your final argument?I definitely know that your disrespect is also known as being incredibly rude.Now go home.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Picking on peoples choices of words as your final argument?You wrote 2 sentences that mean the exact opposite of each other because of your word choices. Which sentence should I argue with?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You wrote 2 sentences that mean the exact opposite of each other because of your word choices. Which sentence should I argue with?Yet again your being rude by picking on absolutely ordinary sentence structure.What are you on about this time?Picking on peoples choice of words is both disrespectful and rude.What are you blabbing about?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yet again your being rude by picking on absolutely ordinary sentence structure.I am not picking on your sentence structure. I am picking on your sentence meaning.What are you on about this time?Your first sentence meant the exact opposite of your second sentence.Picking on peoples choice of words is both disrespectful and rude.It isn't as rude as calling someone rude without understanding a thing they wrote.What are you blabbing about?If you don't understand what I am blabbing about how can you possibly come to the conclusion that what I am saying is rude?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I am not picking on your sentence structure. I am picking on your sentence meaning.You are telling me what my sentences mean based on what the words in those sentences mean.You can't go around telling everybody what certain words mean.Your first sentence meant the exact opposite of your second sentence.You mean the meaning of the words in the first sentence contradict the meaning of the words in the second sentence?Yet again, it's about arguing over words.It isn't as rude as calling someone rude without understanding a thing they wrote.I may not understand your point, but the way you are going about it is still rude.Even if I still didn't understand your point, you can get it across in a nicer way.If you don't understand what I am blabbing about how can you possibly come to the conclusion that what I am saying is rude?I know that you are picking on my choice of words and that is rude, but by doing so I still don't know what point you are trying to make.I still can't see your point, but I am well aware of means that you are using to get your point across.Whatever your point might be, you can't go about it by just picking on my use of words.This all started from you telling me what AKA was supposed to mean.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You are telling me what my sentences mean based on what the words in those sentences mean.Yes. That's how language works.You can't go around telling everybody what certain words mean.Apparently not, since they won't listen.You mean the meaning of the words in the first sentence contradict the meaning of the words in the second sentence?Yet again, it's about arguing over words.What do you want me to do? You said 2 different things. Am I supposed to agree with your first sentence or argue against your second sentence?I may not understand your point, but the way you are going about it is still rude.No it isn't.Even if I still didn't understand your point, you can get it across in a nicer way.I didn't even call you a stupid forgetful fucko.I know that you are picking on my choice of words and that is rude, but by doing so I still don't know what point you are trying to make.I explained it so clearly too.I still can't see your point, but I am well aware of means that you are using to get your point across.You aren't.Whatever your point might be, you can't go about it by just picking on my use of words.Well, I can't pick apart your arguments, you are always half right.This all started from you telling me what AKA was supposed to mean.Did you figure it out?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yes. That's how language works.Yet again, your telling me what the English Language means.Apparently not, since they won't listenThen don't try.What do you want me to do? You said 2 different things. Am I supposed to agree with your first sentence or argue against your second sentence?Try to explain how they contradict.No it isn't.If I felt it was rude I felt it was rude.I didn't even call you a stupid forgetful fucko.That's a start to sorting out your attitude.I explained it so clearly too.Not to my ears.You aren't.Still doesn't sound fair?Well, I can't pick apart your arguments, you are always half right.What makes someone half right isn't due to someone's choice of words, it is the context behind them.Arguing over the context of those words is more central to a debate than arguing what the words mean.Did you figure it out?I understand what it would entail from my perspective, but not what you were actually trying to get across.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yet again, your telling me what the English Language means.When you start understanding the English language, people will stop telling you what the English language means.Then don't try.Wow.Try to explain how they contradict.The first sentence said that the were different. The second sentence said they were the same.If I felt it was rude I felt it was rude.Bullshit. You don't get to decide what is rude.That's a start to sorting out your attitude.Apparently not.Not to my ears.I am glad you can admit that it is a problem on your end.What makes someone half right isn't due to someone's choice of words, it is the context behind them.What makes you half right is that half of what you say says one thing, and the other half says the exact opposite. You are always half right.Arguing over the context of those words is more central to a debate than arguing what the words mean.There is no context that makes 2 contradictory statements both true.I understand what it would entail from my perspective, but not what you were actually trying to get across.I look forward to your next argument where you will say that you always knew.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

When you start understanding the English language, people will stop telling you what the English language means.Which people other than you insist on my choice of words to begin with?Wow.Gobsmacked?The first sentence said that the were different. The second sentence said they were the same.What was the same?What was different?It's all about context and differing perspective.Try to understand someone's perspective.Bullshit. You don't get to decide what is rude.Don't try to dictate to me what I shall say.Apparently not.Pack it in.I am glad you can admit that it is a problem on your end.I'm wiling to listen, but I won't tolerate vain low-end arguments.What makes you half right is that half of what you say says one thing, and the other half says the exact opposite. You are always half right.You have yet to point out a proper contradiction.You like to add a false context and pretend that my words contradict based on that context.Try to understand the actual context of my words instead of adding a false context.Try to get to know somebody, don't be cold-headed.There is no context that makes 2 contradictory statements both true.You assume the context that I had said.Whether two statements contradict depends on the context.On it's own, rarely do two statements ever contradict, you have just got to understand their context.I look forward to your next argument where you will say that you always knew.I know what I need to know about.