azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

First of all you spelled hurts wrong LOL: And second of all Motocross is harder than football because the field is the same way and in motocross the track gets ridden every time you cross the finish line so when you come up on a turn you have to think what line you have to take. You probably dont know but motocross riders have to work out in order to lift the bike stupid you think they run around the track?. Hey by the way let's see how long you can survive on a track (Beastman)
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Bro like, yea football is hard but.. Motocross is the most physically demanding sport in the world, type it in and their not talking abt football like nfl their talking abt soccer..
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

Okay guys, let's be completly honest here. It's obvious that both sides have never tried (or even know much about) the other sport. While I have never played either sport or even taken intrest in them, I think this is pretty un-biased. With all honesty, if you switched sports, all of you would get destroyed. Both sports require a specific set of skills, strengths, and endurances. I am certain that both sides have a passion for thier sport, and might get a bit of a 'swollen head', for lack of a better saying. And maybe I might throw my two-cents in. I don't think it's really good for you to be breaking bones on any given day, let alone keep on racing. You may think football players have no endurance and are wusses, but they are just trying to not destroy thier bodies. All I'm saying is that you shouldn't kill yourself for a sport. It doesn't get you the ladies. Women don't like dead guys.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I'll tell you what. If you put a motocross racer on a football field and a football player on a motocross track, I can guarantee 100% that the motocross racer will do 10x better at football than the football player would at motocross. Depending on what position you are playing in football, you don't actually need a ton of strength, cardio can be more important, and cardio is what the motocross racer excels at. To play football on an average level you only need a set of basic skills, such as running, throwing and catching, and tackling/pushing. If you have not learned to do these things, I don't see how you are matured enough to ride a motorcycle. Racing motocross at an average level requires a set of skills only learned through riding motocross, which take a very long time to develop and can't be imitated any where else. Sure, riding a motorcycle on the street is similar in ways, but it will certainly not make a big difference on how fast you are on the track. I bet it would take most football players 10 minutes just to start a bike up, let alone leaving first gear within hours. It generally takes weeks if not months of riding just to be good enough to race in the beginner class. Also, not all riders are skinny guys like you might think, hell, I can't think of 1 good rider who is not extremely toned in the legs and arms. I do DH-MTB and motocross as my only sports and occasional mass workouts, but at my age I outclass 99% of local football players in raw strength and cardio. This is why in wrestling in gym I had to face the biggest guy in the class who just happened to play football, and weighed over 240lbs, compared to my 150lbs and I still threw him around like he was my weight. Then in the weight room, I just happened to be able to do the heaviest weights in the grade. Whoever started this Football vs Motocross debate really should have chosen a sport that is more comparable to motocross in a physically demanding way, oh wait, I really don't think there is one within it's popularity and practicality.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

In my opinion, Football is more physically challenging because of the strenuous training involved.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

While both football and motocross require physical strength and endurance, the demands on the body are vastly different. Football involves running, jumping, and quick changes of direction, while motocross requires balance, core strength, and endurance to withstand high speeds and rough terrain. It's difficult to compare the two sports as they require different types of physical fitness. However, for fans of both sports, checking out a reliable sport scores site like https://777score.com/football/tournaments/germany/bundesliga-1  can provide the latest updates and scores for all their favorite teams and competitions.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

football is more physical challenging whats so hard about sitting on a motorbike and driving around a track
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

it is MUCH more than that. id like to see you race for 30 minutes straight. We have to physically turn our bikes and handle them so we dont crash and die. A dirt bike is easily 230 lbs.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

This is one of the many reasons you must be tough. Have you ever jumped of a roof? What about three stories? He has...
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

This is one of the many reasons you must be tough. Have you ever jumped of a roof? What about three stories? He has............,......
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

First of all, the only time you can sit is either once you finished the race or when your body breaks, when you break from the extreme conditions, or when your dirt bike is too broken for the wheels to keep spinning.Second of all, you are not driving a car, truck, train, or quad. You are riding with your legs tightened around a 2 wheeled, 250 pound, chunk of metal with flammable fuels, that can hurtle you towards a 15 foot jump going around 50 mph and send you flying like a plane through the air to the rock hard ground dozens of feet below below.Before you debate which is harder, try motocross, and see if you can race well with only several years of practice.By the way, you may be thinking about sport bike racing not motocross
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

football is more physical than motorcross a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a ka a a ah jah agh agh a a a a g a hagh g g ag hah ah jajja ghagh hjh jhhg f g g a jjk akjllkj ahja h a hkj a ghkahk ga jl aal aoal hja ajl aja lha hlah al ahj lahjllj itivmahvhb bb ab ab jkahjk jh
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Your a complete dickhead who knows nothing what the fuck does a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a ka a a ah jah agh agh a a a a g a hagh g g ag hah ah jajja ghagh hjh jhhg f g g a jjk akjllkj ahja h a hkj a ghkahk ga jl aal aoal hja ajl aja lha hlah al ahj lahjllj itivmahvhb bb ab ab jkahjk jh mean, or wait I know shit that comes out of footballers mouth when the scratch their leg and what comes out of a motorcross riders mouth when they break their back
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Im going to argue for motocross because nobody has. obviously none of you have tried motocross. It is a lot more physically challenging than just sitting on the bike for 30 minutes. Your on your feet most of the time, and you have to constantly manipulate the bike with your body, which can weigh up to 250 pounds, depending on the bike. Its hard to be able to yank that thing around nonstop for the entire race. around every corner, off every jump, you are never just sitting there and twisting the throttle. You never get a break while offense is out, or while you sit out on the bench.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

"In football you have to be quick, strong, and fast. You need agility, great eye hand coordination, a willingness to hit and get hit. You need to be fearless and be able to concentrate and remember plays and coverages and routes after you've exerted all you've got physically and mentally." That is what a motorcrosser acquires after his first ever ride. Than he starts to learn motocrossing.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

mate are you serious!! we have to read the track every lap changes and we have to deal with riders changing and decreasing your vision!! motocrossing isnt a word you retard
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

Do all You football players have any idea! what do you think we do ride in our back yard. First of all you guys have constant breaks, Three time outs, and the run time between plays are 15 seconds long. "Oh ya it takes allot of strength and agility to run 15 seconds and stop for a drink". You guys are a bunch of sissies. And talking about working out. You cant prepare for a race every weekend. The pros Work out every day all day doing every thing they can to stay fit. They still have trouble. Tell you what next time i go to the track ill bring some of you with me. Ill throw you butt on the bike and ill watch you fail and panic when your going up a hill.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

I get it but in motocross you have to be willing to possibly get landed on taken out fall at massave speeds break countless bones and so much more
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

While you are right. That is true. The majority of people arguing for mx have only taken physical conditioning into account. There are other factors. Such as mental conditioning as you mentioned. That is a factor as the track tends to change every lap due to the number of riders going through it and tearing up the track. E.g. Ruts are getting deeper. Bumps are getting bigger e.t.c. You also need to be strong, co-irdinated, agile, fast, and stable to control the bike. And yes. As you mentioned. Fearless. You need a big set of balls to hit some of the jumps you will find on your average motocross track. I don't know for sure whether motocross is harder than football or vice versa. Personally I think it would be but I'm assuming this thread is about motocross vs American football and I have never played American football so I don't know for sure
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Like dude. search up how physically demand is motocross and you will get in the top 10 #1 motocross. You basically don't know what you talking abt. there talking abt soccor. Yes football/NFL is hard but motocross is a really hard SPORT.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

im going for motocross because its just all around the hardes and most demanding sport
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross is hands down the most physically demanding sport. 30 min. motos, 100 degree heat, punishing terrain, mud, rutted corners, whooped out straights, jump faces with holes in them, up to 125 foot leaps. If any one who is voting for football is willing to try this on a 450cc dirt bike, I will gladly loan you mine. a riders heart rate is constantly hovering around 180 bpm, you are dressed from head to toe in protective gear that adds 15 pounds or more to your body, while trying to manuever a 200 pound machine through rough terrain, and over obstacles that most people would walk around rather than over, all while trying to go as fast as possible. you tell me which is tougher !!!
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

This argument is hands down a no brainer. Not to mention it has already been proven that the physical endurance needed to race a 30 minute moto is far above that which is required for football. Anyone who says that Motocross is a "sit-down" sport, has obviously never been to a race.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

yes your r right. I do it in facts and i raced in 105 heat at glen halon. your right bro.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

It really frustrates me when peopel say motocross is for lazy people, all u do is sit there and go around, but people havnt experiance what its really like, inmageine riding flat out for 30 mins hitting jumps bumbs corners trying to get the bike down low. sure football may be hard but it doesnt compare to motocross
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross is by far harder than football along with 95% of any other sports. In all team sports, if a player is playing bad, or get tired they get a sub and the game goes on. in motocross its a one man show. if you get tired or arent doing well you have to tough it out unlike all those other sports.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I don't race motocross, but my 15 year old son does. I have walked several of his the tracks and I would have to say that most football players would not be able to walk it. Every sport has it's challenges, but the overall conditioning that a rider needs in this sport is far more than football. They have to be well rounded in strenght and conditioning, not just the legs or upperbody as some football players are. As someone else mentioned, it is a one man sport, if they miss a shift or are too tired to race up to their best ability, they loose! It’s phyically and emotionally challenging!
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross is much harder than football. Alot of people think that motocross is just sitting on a dirt bike and ridding, but its much more harder than that. You are constantely moving yourself and a several hundred pound dirt bike, but the hardest part is the training. You can ask any professional racer and they will tell you that from the time you get up to the time you go to sleep you are either in the gym or on the bike.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

Ur just plain lazy if u think motocross is harder, u don't need mussle, speed, or even in shape for motocross, when you see one of those races u don't see people panting, they don't even break a sweat. Golf is more physical dimanding than motocross . Who cares if there are 250 ft jumps, that's not u jumping or moveing around the track it's all the dirtbike or ATV. Key word moto doesn't that sound a little like motor. Court agurned FOOTBALL WINS
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

I have to argue with you here, I used to do Hockey, Football for many years, and I was in good shape (still in pretty good shape) and about 3 years ago I bought myself a 250cc dirtbike to ride with my buddy, thinking that it wouldnt be as hard as he told me it was. well we rode some very open trails at first, not many turns or anything really technical and I hardly broke a sweat, BUT then he took me to a real track, and sent me out, after 2 laps in this track, that had just been fixed up, nu bumps, ruts or water on it. I was beyond tired! you have no clue how demanding it really is, you have around 50 horsepower trying to push you off the back of the bike, you have to cling on with your knees and arms, while at the same time keep perfect control of the bike over big jumps, you constantly move about on the bike, which isnt easy when all that power wants to kick you off the bike. going on a flat surface isnt hard, anybody can do it. but going to a track to ride, is really alot harder than it seems!
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

are u dumb? if u actually ever watch a race and see the racers after they a drenched with sweat, and im pretty sure that their are no out of shape or fat dudes racing pro MX.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

OK let me ask you something have you ever aced motocross or even did laps on a track? and you are talking bullshit they do breath heavy when they are out their racing!! AND obviously you break a sweat dip shit thats like saying you don't break a sweat while running in 100 degree weather!! and ave you noticed that their are not football books. like no straight football books. but there are motocross books and about 5 different magazine names... last but not least we arnt stupid enough to go out and kill each other for a ball... we don't chase balls we have balls!!!
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: football

I own a dirt bike and I can play football. Think about it have u ever actualy have played football? I've played both and I know what it's about and how hard they are. The musle u will really need for motocross is all in the rist. With football if ur not muscular strong fit u will get seriosly hert or snap in half
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

omfg i bet ur just putting around ur 20ft yard, did u not read what he said? he said yea anybody can ride a straight away but once u get on a track ur done. ive done many sports in the past such as football, basketball, soccer, baseball, and motocross. by far the hardest is obviously MX. u dont even know how difficult it is if uve done it for real
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Football's for pussies. Rugby is where it's at. Rugby has longer ball play time, generally more physically demanding (have you ever seen how much running the pack has to do?) and way better to watch.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Football may be involving risk but the risk involved in the motocross is far more than this one. As we know;More Risk=More Excitements = More Pleasure of success.The stunts in this sport is more awesome and cool and s dangerous that sometimes it all seems so unreal!I like motocross.But this don't mean football sucks
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

motocross by far i ride a 200 pound suzuki rm 125 and im 14 football is for a bunch of little preppy school kids
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

How can you say that your foot ball players are giving 100%? Look at what they do in between plays. They have time to relax and get their breath. They spend more time on the bench checking out the cheer leaders. Both girls and guys lol. I would like to see someone call time out. On a 30min plus 2 lap moto. (wait I need to catch my breath TIME-OUT). That does not work in motocross or supercross.!! Lets do a test, lets put a heart rate monitor on a top ranking football player for one whole game. Then do the same for a motocross racer. Compair the results you will see that the motocross racer's heart beat is maxxed out the whole race. Even when at the starting gate. The football player is not even close to matching that... (FACT)... Motocross and supercross racers take life and death chances that a football player would not even consider.. What do football players do in between seasons, oh watch baseball.. What do motocross racers do in between seasons oh work out and stay inshape to get ready for supercross. No breaks. "LET'S ASK JOE GIBBS"He was the coach for the Washington Red Skins. Now he is the owner of JGR (Joe Gibbs Racing). He has his own motocross team.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Another thing to remember is that a motocross race is non stop. A football player spends a lot of time on the bench or standing around in between plays, while in motocross there is no breaks, time-outs, or half times. In motocross your fully committed and focused 100% of the time, and that makes it both more physically and mentally challenging.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

In football you run at most twenty yards before getting tackled. Yes you do get hit very hard. And the punishment towards your body is great. But in motocross you enter a turn about ten feet wide with forty other riders going up to speeds of 50 plus. Racing for thirty plus minutes in the roughest conditions trying to muscle around a 230 pound plus machine of a bike with loads of power that most people would shit their pants trying to ride. So yes motocross is much more physically demanding than football, and all you people who say football is tougher, go race at pro level then tell me which is tougher, that's is you can go their speed
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross 100%. When you say in football ow you have to work with your teammates and thats hard, well in motocross you have to constantly overcome fear and self-doubts hoping that whatever you do will not kill you. Try sitting at a starting gate with 39 people to the sides of you knowing that it could be your last race. Try battling with 39 other people who want to take you out, and you don't just fall to the ground with a bruise, you crash, and you crash hard and you will most likely break bones. You gotta be physically fit because you race for 30 minutes straight. One race is the equivalent of sprinting 5 miles. If you say football, you obviously haven't raced. And if you have raced, you obviously didn't win unless you were racing with yourself.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

By the way you are completely wrong on sitting down for 30 minutes. the only place is sit down are corners unless you get tired, and most corners that are sweeped out you stand up. just keep blaming your team for loosing. everything a rider does wrong is on his part. thats why football players are whinney getting hit by another player is nothing to a motocross rider. you try swapping out going 30 to 40 miles and our onto dirt that's prolly 4 times the hurt than getting hit by a linebacker. You guys are stupid and fanboys at the most. we controll a over 200 pound bike. and you guys can't dodge a fat ass? pretty sad in my opinion.
Debate: Is football more physically challenging than motocross?
Side: motocross

Motocross is waaay more physically challenging than football! All you face in football is a load of sweaty men in tight shorts kicking at your chins and pushing you out the way for their 10 seconds with the ball! In motocross you face huge heavy machines being hurdled towards you in every direction, you have to fight for the line and everyone is trying to be the best, get the holeshot and come in 1st place! Motocross is a very male heavy sport and being a female like myself that makes it 10X scarier! But i must say, i have never seen any motocrosser place a fake blood pellet in their mouth to symbalise injury. If anyone done that at motocross they would be the laughing stock of the club! In football noo they get seen to imidiatly by paramedics and their team gets a free kick, nice one(Y). Some of you football pussys fall not even a meter and you're led on the floor in agony! Ty falling the height Chad Reed did and get back up and carry on another 15 or so mins of hard core riding. Enough said!