azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

my parents taught us about the truth if they did then why do you follow a book of mythology and a make belive god?I choose to follow Jesus unlike youand that's your error.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

do you even no what mythology is of couse you dont because you have not checked the dictionary
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Take the bible to your hands. There you go, you've some mythology in your hands.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

that is not proof that the bible is mythology the bible is true history get it in your head
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

the bible is true history get it in your headso the world is less than 10,00 years old? so someone can live to 800 years old? so the physically impossible great flood happened?that is not proof that the bible is mythologyit's more proof then the bible will ever have proving it's not mythology.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

God was saying in Genesis 6:3 that He is not going to let man live forever on this present earth in his present condition--yet he will be allowed to live at least 120 years. We know this verse is not talking about the maximum number of years a person is promised to live, because God says, “ yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.” Also, if the 120 years that God was talking about was the maximum number of years that a person could live, then no one would live beyond the age of 120. However, we have plenty of people in the Bible and elsewhere that have lived to beyond 120.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

>so the world is less than 10,00 years oldYes>so the physically impossible great flood happened?NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE! and Yes.The bible is true... this just shows that you have no faith. Any religion has faith. Because we believe in a god without seeing them (Or in my case him). But I bet if you saw god or Jesus you would instantly believe and regret following lies. It wouldn't be true faith because true faith is believing without seeing not seeing is believing.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

You said, "do you even no what mythology is of couse you dont because you have not checked the dictionary"Then I said, "Take the bible to your hands. There you go, you've some mythology in your hands."Then I checked a dictionary:my·thol·o·gy1.a body of myths, as that of a particular people or that relating to a particular person2.myths collectively.3.the science or study of myths.4.a set of stories, traditions, or beliefs associated with a particular group or the history of an event, arising naturally or deliberately fosteredSee, I, for one, knew the definition before I wrote my so very accurate comment.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

If evolution were correct, and humans evolved from monkeys, then why are monkeys still around today? There is really no explanation for this, yet this heathen ideal is still taught in our schools. No doubt thanks to the agenda’s being pushed by gays and their liberal co-conspirators to destroy our youth and convert the nation to communism.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution READ IT!
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

If evolution were correct, and humans evolved from monkeys,that their just shows how much you know about the subject.then why are monkeys still around today?because we evolved from a common ancestor.There is really no explanation for thissee above.yet this heathen ideal is still taught in our schools.because it's backed by fact.No doubt thanks to the agenda’s being pushed by gays and their liberal co-conspirators to destroy our youth and convert the nation to communism.Is the rest of your family as crazy as you and srom?actually it's because people who actually think for them selves decided that the youth should be taught the truth in school instead of crap like the bible.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Exactly! Scientist's say that when dinosaurs evolved the weaker 'un-evolved' ones died out. So yes why have monkeys not died out? Especially as since scientists insist the worlds been around for millions of years then why wouldn't our ancestor humans kill off the monkeys?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

So Mr Bee your saying that Evolution was invented by Commie Gays who are trying to corrupt our youth, wow I never realised, thank God we've got you to save us all. Have you ever heard of a fella lived a few years ago went by the name of Charles Darwin he was married and a Christian and guess what he was the guy that came up with the whole theory of evolution but he was a bit of a Liberal though so maybe he was one of the ones that was planning on teaming up with the Gays to poison the minds of the youth. Jeez in my day it was Sex, Drugs and Rock "N" Roll that was going to be the downfall of the youth now we're in a new Century and it's going to be Education that's going to poison their minds. I'm glad I grew up in a more enlightened age
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I created this debate because I wanted to see people's opinion on itYah fools
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

>See, I, for one, knew the definition before I wrote my so very accurate comment.Then why copy off of a on-line dictionary if you knew it forehand? When you could made you point better by putting it in you own words making it actually look like you knew it's meaning.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

You are missing the point of dictionaries and giving evidence...I knew what it meant but perhaps there was something more to it? Apparently there was not.Before I press submit I tend to make sure I am right (most of the times anyway).
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

do you even no what mythology isa set of stories, traditions, or beliefs associated with a particular group or the history of an event, arising naturally or deliberately fostered. the bible fits perfectly under that definition.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

You fucking retard need come out of your little box of lunacy.Something I also said there, "And there's a long list of references and further reading down there." Down there on the wikipedia page.Prove that God exists. You can't, there's no evidence (assuming we are talking about a very powerful being, not religion-specific Gods because they do not exist). There is only logic that inclines heavily toward God not existing.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

give me proof that evolution exist you retard or are you scared cause evolution is not going to save you from going to hell
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

give me proof that evolution existread the articles you might learn something.you scared cause evolution is not going to save you from going to hellyou only go to hel if your a coward. the Christan hell doesn't exist.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

give me proof that god exsist and that the bible tells the truth.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

srom all ready told you so im not going to start because someone told you and you choose to ignore it
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

srom all ready told youno he did'ntso im not going to start because someone told you and you choose to ignore itok got it you dont have any proof
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I just told you ignorant fool that if I start you will say there is no proof
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

you claim i am ignorant but yet you dont accept anything that conflicts with the bible.if I start you will say there is no proofbecause their is no proof showing the bible as valid.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EvolutionBefore saying ANYTHING else, READ IT!!! And THINK!!! There is also a very long list of references down there, and a bit of further reading.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I will not check out the link because it is not a reliable source
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I will not check out the link because it is not a reliable sourcegot any proof of that?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

It is as reliable as it can get; there are references down there as I said.You are sooo brainwashed.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

no thats not proof, the reason why cause its fake and you said to srom that Christianity has no proof so im going to say that isn't proof
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Christianity has no proof they dont all they have is a book of mythology called the bible.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

If humans are not animals then why do they belong to the animal kingdom? If humans are not animals are we plants then? Bacteria?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I have met a few humans that definately were not part of the Animal Kingdom and I think were closer to Plants in fact i'm not sure they were even that evolved
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I have met a few humans that definately were not part of the Animal Kingdom and I think were closer to Plants in fact i'm not sure they were even that evolvedThen their not humans.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Humans are animals. If not animals then what? Are we also not mammals? Mammals are animals...
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

humans are humans for crying out loud can't you get itYah Fools
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

As dogs are dogs, cats are cats, snails are snails. They are ALL animals, just as are humans animals.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

As dogs are dogs, cats are cats, snails are snails that's the same as human are humans
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Exactly. And humans are animals, as are dogs and cats and snails. The only difference is that they are of different species, and subcategories.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Snails aren't animals, they're invertebrates
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Snails aren't animals, they're invertebratesInvertebrates are animals.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Ever heard of Animal Kingdom? You know, the thing to which ALL animals belong to, including humans."Animal" is not a species, humans are a species, as are dogs, cats, and snails, and all other animals. And all those species belong to the Animal Kingdom, which means they are all animals.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Nice try, but no.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

You are wrong. Humans are mammals and mammals are animals. Do you not know your science? If you don't then you better start before you become an even bigger idiot.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

NO YOU ARE WRONG humans are humans, humans are called humans not mammals.Not All creatures are not just mammals
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Their is no animal called just mammal Yah Fool
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

i did not say that i said not all creatures are mammals some are invertebrates and,animals oh and itsYah Fools :p
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

So you believe humans aren't animals.What are you considered, then?Bacteria?Fungi?Plants?Please explain that to me...
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

we are considered human. humans are humans; humans are not called animals right
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Humans are animals. We are also primates. Seriously, what in the hell are they teaching you in school? Not much, obviously.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

if we were primates we would be a monkey but we are not. what are you talking about.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Not all primates are monkeys... good grief, why am I even talking to you?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

you were the one that who started it so I thank you for speaking the truth out
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

speaking the truth outWhat in the hell does that even mean? Please, there are people from all over the world on this site and you are just embarrassing... I'm ashamed of your education as an American.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

it means speak the truth it says it right there you cant see that
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

What constitutes an animal (taken from Wikipedia):Animals have several characteristics that set them apart from other living things. Animals are eukaryote and mostly multicellular,[4] which separates them from bacteria and most protists. They are heterotrophic,[5] generally digesting food in an internal chamber, which separates them from plants and algae.[6] They are also distinguished from plants, algae, and fungi by lacking rigid cell walls.[7] All animals are motile,[8] if only at certain life stages. In most animals, embryos pass through a blastula stage,[9] which is a characteristic exclusive to animals.--Human cells have a nucleus, therefore their cells are eukaryotic-Humans are heterotrophs, because we cannot reduce the amount of carbon in our bodies.-We, quite obviously, don't have cell walls, since we don't have the ability to store water within out bodies.-Humans are also motile, since we DO move, and this DOES consume energy.Thusly, humans ARE animals.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

you copied and paste that from wiki i dont care i did not read that so its fine. humans are only humans because they are named humans just like animals are animals. Animals are not humans. you are basically saying that animal and human is opposite but their not. Because they are named corectly
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Actually, the only thing I copypasted was what exactly constutied an animal. You are mistakenly assuming 'animal' is the name of a specific species. However, human IS the name of a specific species within the animal kingdom.You're using the square-rectangle scenario... Really? -__-Squares are rectangles, but rectangles aren't squares.Humans are animals, but not all animals are human.Get it, moron?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Humans are not their own special class of species separate from all branches within the animal kingdom. Humans are animals.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

if they were animals then we humans would be called animals right so humans are humans pay attention
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Animal is a classification, not a species, dumbass.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

it did not say it was a species you need an eye seriously your eyes must me like a chinese man because you can see that i did not post that duh LOL :P
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Humans are animals. Humans are also humans. Please try to use common sense, and perhaps take a class on biology.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Whether you believe in evolution or not, humans are animals. We are apes that fit into the category of mammals and then vertebrates. You don't have to believe in evolution to know that.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

First, there is a massive difference between cruel experiments and simple animal psychological experiments.Not all experiments mean dissecting something while it's living or feeding it poison.Most modern experiments are expected to be humane, and have a written purpose.Non-humane experiments, where the animals are kept in filthy living quarters or are treated badly are not experiments I endorse, however, it might still be important to conduct more controversial experiments as well.It is a tough issue, but if you have a hypothesis regarding something, and can prove that you will conduct a test humanely, then I feel that it may be something that one should be allowed to test, provided it will actually prove something.Testing animals for fun is cruelty and nothing more.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Sure! Thats what god put them here for------------------------
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

No, that's what they evolved for.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Animals evolved to be free not tested on. Every living cell in this universe has the right to be free without being in a cage or container or a restricted area just for them.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

On must treat all animals humanely as God commands in the Bible and by Judeo-Christian tradition.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

But that would mean I would have to be a vegetarian! Are you joking? You cannot deprive me from what belongs in my mouth. It isn't ethical.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I do love animals but the animals they probably have no where else to go because they are orphans or grew up in a cage and doesn't know how to survive in the wild. Most of the time scientists use animals that aren't endangered. But if you are against this then think of it this way. If any of your family members died from a harmful disease these animals are helping find a cure once the cure is found they do not have to test on the animal any more.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Isn't that why the chicken crossed the road? To help us determine which came first, the chicken or the egg.Also, isn't that how they got the wood chuck to chuck wood so that we could figure out how much wood he could chuck?I think this side is winning ;)
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Why yes, and the US government does it all the time. How else can you explain all of the crazy people running around here?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

yes, provided that it is conducted under humane conditions
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Barely any of you would be alive right now if it were not for scientific experimentation, and that includes working with animals. One can not make drugs or prove new measures designed to aid the biological system without working on a biological system.I'd like to see those that disagree with this form of research, turn down the medicines that will keep them or their loved ones alive, because they feel sorry for the bunnies.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I do not use medicine or drugs. I let my immune system do the work. I just eat the right foods to help. That's how I get better twice as quick if taking medicines or drugs.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I'd like to see you eat your way out of a brain tumor.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I like to see you get hit by a bus before I drown myself in Lake Michigan then.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Not really the same thing now, is it?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

You are the dumbest person I have ever met! I thought Rylee Lonske was the dumbest person in the universe but apparently you are!
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

My my, unfurl your panties Miss, this is not acceptable behavior.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Don't you tell me what to do! You are not my boss! I don't take orders from anybody and don't you ever call me miss ever again. I'm the rudest craziest chick you will ever meet!
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Well, Actually I think you're kind of a wannabe.I mean, you try to be tough.. but I think everyone just laughs at you, because you're a tiny little miss trying to be a tough rockstar.I must say I think hello kitty is more rude than you are.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Ok I think you are correct about hello kitty being more rude than me. I remember I use to be so nice to everybody but of course I got picked on for that so yeah I am embarrassed that I have to admit that you are correct about that but please don't call me a little miss trying to be a tough rockstar. Because I am not a rockstar or a little miss. I am a Tom boy get over that fact that I trying to be tough so then I won't be picked on.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

You trolling?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

What the fuck is that suppose to mean bitch? I do not troll! You need to get your facts straight! Just because I say something doesn't mean it defines who I am!
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

You must be trolling.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Erm...It's a massively well-known internet meme, and a 'description' of someone:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet) )
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Sorry I don't go on wikepedia. I don't trust it because anybody can change things on there and make it not true so I'll find somewhere else on the Internet besides Wikipedia.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Ugh... I have the ignorant people who claim Wikipedia is innaccurate/unreliable...http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.htmlhttp://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2005-12-14-nature-wiki_x.htmhttp://www.ecampusnews.com/technologies/study-suggests-wikipedia-is-accurate-â€¦-and-a-little-dull/http://www.switched.com/2010/06/04/wikipedia-is-accurate-but-not-very-easy- to-read-study-finds/ http://bpastudio.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/wikieval/ http://www.quakercampus.com/content/wikipedia-more-accurate-more-current-encyclopedia http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/01/study-wikipedia-actually-pretty-accurate-so-calm-down/
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Lets see at New Buffalo Middle School Wikipedia is blocked off.