azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Nope.1) A good test of whether or not someone's ideas are way out there is whether the people around them think they've gone too far. When they start ignoring what the world around them thinks that's when they're at risk to go off the deep end and drown their kids for being demons or shoot up a movie theatre. Don't ignore the advice and feedback of the world around you.2) It baffles me why you think someone disagreeing with you on a debate website must be a punk. If you don't want to debate then don't come to a place to debate. And the text I've written to you each and every time has been appropriate debate rhetoric. You and I summarily disagree on religion. That is a fact. But my disagreeing with you on religion doesn't make me a punk. In fact to the contrary, automatically banning people routinely on your debates as well as insulting them at the moment you ban them is indeed the punk behavior.3) Again with the burn in hell threat. That's all you've got. I reject that, not because I reject God, and not because I'm wicked, but because I reject peddling fear, I reject literal word for word acceptance of ancient texts, and because I reject closed mindedness. None of that puts me at odds with God, Ironically, embracing closed minded do as your told mentality is what allows groups like ISIS to get away with the horrors that they commit. I will not bow to your attempts to scare me, silence me, or shut down free thinking or free expression.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Will you ever stop crying?....................................................................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

If you think the fire of Hell where you are going is a wolf, you probably think the sky is falling. Why do you pay any attention to anything I say? My message is consistent, and you won't believe unforgiven sinners must be confined in the fire of Hell until you wake up there. So why pay any attention to anything I say? Really, punk, I see no reason to try to reason with you since you think you are as good as God.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Your message is consistently wrong, like a street corner preacher yelling fire and brimstone at normal people just walking by going about their lives.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You cannot justify your life, insisting you are justified to live outside of Hell is in reality demanding God prove you wrong by leaving you in Hell.The message is that God Himself came down from Heaven in the form of a man, the Son of God who died for the sins of the world, and rose from the dead to be the justification in life eternal of all who believe on Him, it's called the gospel, the good news from God, His offer of peace toward man.You want to justify your own life, you think your own stinking opinion of yourself is going to keep you out of Hell, go ahead and see for yourself. You're a fool who thinks he's smarter than God and losing everything in death and bound to wake up in Hell if you won't repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

By your own words, I have concluded that you will not believe you are on your way to Hell until you wake up in the fire so it's a waste of time for me to try to get you to wake up before it's too late. You're a hater I don't have time for.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

So what if you challenge the word of God. You can't win arguing against God's, His word will stand while you fall.You're trying to deny the truth and all you are getting is denial of your own life.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

That is why the Progressives are still upset that apes are in zoos and have not evolved into men ! Progressives just can't figure that one out !
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You do realize that humans ands apes share a common ancestor, and our evolutions were different and we came out as being on top.We didn't come from apes, but apes and us came from somewhere.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Maybe you came from the uncle of an ape and maybe you look like a monkey......I have heard that they taught an ape to speak around 300 words in sign language, now I see they taught one to type. People really have done wonderful things, now they are teaching apes to type!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I find it interesting that there are some people who look at science as if science is doing something. From where I'm sitting science is simply trying to understand that which already exist assuming those involved get it right!Especially in this day and age I do not bother to ascertain whether or not an unknown, unfamiliar creature has been discovered Why because as always when man gets involved one doesn't know what to expect so with mankind crossbreeding species that shouldn't be crossbred and now that he has access to gene splicing I have no doubt we are going to have and already had bazaar looking species. Of course with all the secret labs we have nobodies going to say where the species came from so were left to assume they must be from outer space or the era of dinosaur age hasn't left yet!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I do think evolution is science. There is quantifiable evidence for evolution and we can see it everywhere. However, the kind of evolution I am referring to is microevolution, not macro
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

There is mountains of evidence for evolution. The scientific consensus is that evolution is true. To believe otherwise would need a massive conspiracy or belief in a hyper reality like the Matrix or Inception. "67 percent—of public high school biology teachers are presenting evolution forthrightly, emphasizing the broad scientific consensus on evolution" By Glenn Branch and Ann Reid on September 12, 2020A grand conspiracy is mathematically unfeasible. Due to inconfidence alone an insider would accidental leak details of the conspiracy and the public would know. There is no evidence for a hyper reality.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

More evidence of the scientific consensus on evolution. "Nearly all (around 97%) of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity" wikipedia Original source pew research: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2009/07/09/section-5-evolution-climate-change-and-other-issues/
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Multiple lines of evidence proving evolution. A. Fossils.B. Molecular evidence.C. Radioactive dating. D. Everyday evolution A. How do you explain the dinosaur bones if you don't believe in evolution? B. The genes under a microscope, how can you explain the differences?C. How about Carbon 14 isotopes and other isotopes used for dating?D. What about antibiotic-resistant bacteria evolving in a petri dish?
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

1. DNA disproves Evolution ever occurred, it's not occurring and it's still not occurring2. Humans are not animals, biblically and scientifically3. Biology disproves all your subjective opinions and pseudoscientific claims4. Darwin has already been disproven by Ken Ham5. Bill Nye has no supporting evidence6. God is real7. Darwinian evolutionists believe what? In a religion of atheism and naturalism. Hypocrites! They claim they support science but don't at the same time! It's laughable. God prevails!
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Consensus is not evidence. To use it as such is a logical fallacy. It does not follow that, "A majority think X, therefore X is true."
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Consensus is not evidence. To use it as such is a logical fallacy.Not when it's a scientific consensus. That's different than a generic argumentum ad populum.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

The proposed evidence was an opinion poll of human beings. Humans do not become infallible when they work in a lab or when they pass their degree. They do not become more truthful either, and they all have to put bread on the table. What do you suppose happens to a palaeontologist whose paper argues against the normal dating methods that 97% of his peers and forerunners staked their careers on? Generally, he doesn't get published, and then nobody funds him. So what separates scientific consensus from the mob; does education, does breadth of knowledge, does being "smarter"?Even if this was a poll of microbiologists, biologists, biochemists, zoologists, palaeontologists and others from intrinsically related fields, a smart person can still be wrong. Except this poll doesn't say, "97% of scientists who work in related fields think theory X is true." One of them might be a mathematician. Another might study fluid mechanics on a Formula 1 exhaust manifold. So you can't even necessarily claim that all those polled are any more knowledgeable on the subject of evolution than you or I. Thus, the correlation between this poll result and the actual experimental data gets more tenuous the more you think about it.If by "scientific consensus" you meant that the vast majority of evidence agrees with an idea, that would imply the idea was accurate. You would then be right. That is not a fallacy whose Latin name you so proudly googled. However, it actually means that the vast majority of people in the scientific community agree with an idea, and that is not evidence.Thus, even scientific consensus is not evidence. To us it as such is still a fallacy.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

The proposed evidence was an opinion poll of human beings.No, it was an opinion poll of scientists. The greatest experts in the matter in which an opinion is sought, and people who only form opinions on the basis of reliable evidence. All the usual ignorance and misinformation which pervades opinions has been removed. Therefore, a (genuine and demonstrable) scientific consensus is a valid argument, not an appeal to popularity.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Read those first two sentences again. Slowly. The quote first. Then your correction below it. In your opinion, are scientists human?Petty jokes aside, I concede that the reliability of such a poll is of a little more value than one of the general population, for some (not all) of the reasons you brought.However, no interpretation of evidence is in itself evidence, no matter the brilliance of the interpreter. By extension, the collated interpretations of a great many scientists do not amount to evidence. The list of pervasive scientific theories which have since been disproved is a long one. If we are to choose between interpretations based on the cumulative intellect of their proponents, then and then only is such a poll of real use.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Hi, Dan_BlaydeWelcome to createdebate. :)A scientific consensus is vastly different than the majority of the public. A consensus of experts is based upon multiple lines of convergent evidence.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

A consensus is only a matter of percentage, if 60% of experts agree, that is a consensus, it doesn't mean that the consensus is right.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Multiple times I will say this, consensus is indeed based on agreeing with facts and truth. However, if people are claiming that there is consensus supporting a lie, than it's a lie. Your arguments are invalidated and you have lost this debate, hypocrite.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

I'm going to assume the debate is about whether the THEORY OF EVOLUTION is PROBABLY true based on all the evidence we have collected. If that is the debate, evolution is scientifically MOSTLY true. The people who have studied it the most would probably say 99.9% true. I want everyone to understand why it is mostly true and think i sorta have but then i should be also able to figure out how to explain why they should believe it is mostly true and i can't seem to do that. The best i can come up with for the opposing argument is that we don't know 100 which means it could be false and the next most likely, in my opinion, is some entity that created us and wants us to think IT didn't. It would be much more intelligent because duh and at the same time i like to fantasize about what it really wants. If it revealed itself we would arguably be a species at peace and create a utopia. It would unify us and we'd probably be pissed and work together to get some payback, at least americans would...
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Thanks, I realized after I created the debate that hypothesis can never be proven to be true. Yet, that is more of a technically or accuracy issue.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

So far evolution is the most plausible explanation for our own existence and the ever unfolding mysteries of the cosmos.However the weakness of this highly respected, but nevertheless theoretical hypothesis, is its starting point which relies on the dubious supposition of the BIG BANG THEORY.This postulation has never explained from where the energy came to cause such an enormous explosion and how the space was conveniently available to accommodate the matter created by the expediently named;- '' THE BIG BANG''.Until the aforementioned unexplained starting point of evolution can be clearly illustrated beyond a doubt and without wilfully using baffling scientific jargon/gobbledygook this THEORY must remain no more than an elaborate THESIS.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

"So far evolution is the most plausible explanation for our own existence and the ever unfolding mysteries of the cosmos." NorwichGreat explanation! Until a better hypothesis comes around, evolution stays the best theory.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

A big 10/4 on that good buddy, but the operative word in your post is THEORY. The danger always exists that hypothesis such as evolution will, eventually be accepted as fact by those who feel it necessary to have the existence of mankind and the Universe explained.Throughout history so called scientific FACTS have been proven wrong.For instance, well into the last century the scientists of their day stated that THE UNIVERSE consisted only of our Galaxy, THE MILKY WAY.That along with countless other SCIENTIFIC FACTS have since been trashed and replaced with other SCIENTIFIC FACTS.KEEP AN OPEN MIND AND INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGE EVERYTHING YOU READ AND HEAR.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Bill Nye argues subjectively that creationism is bad for kids. How? Is it demeaningful to humans overall? Nope. Creationism is all about God's creations and how they all came to be. It is a wonderful part of life. Darwinian evolution is bad for children due to these reasons:It doesn't support our intellectual developmentIt puts us on a wide scale of "morphing" beings when humans are not changelings. Darwin's evolution is a mere fantasy and theory. It's been debunked and will continue to be debunked.It shows that we cannot control ourselves when we definitely can make the effort. We are not uncapable to do so. We learn quick and we can think for ourselves.Animals communicate differently then we do. Whereas they have an animal kingdom/hierarchal system of a food chain, we do not necessarily need it and it's actually harmful when we do. Humans don't eat each other unless they are cannibalistic and that is morally wrong. Yes. Cannibalism is evil. Anyone who defends cannibalism will be debunked and arrested as it is against the law and will always be against the law.Some animals are asexual. Humans are not asexual. Biology states that males need a female partner and females need a male partner. Why? Because of the sperm and egg combining to make an infant. Evolutionists are aware of this, yet they think we evolved from apes? Nope. They may argue, "apes have that similarity of birth", well I can argue back and say, "That's only because we are mammals but that doesn't mean we are the same." Yes, I wage war against bill nye and his subjective lie to control schools. Liberty shalt not die to believe in Christ. I AM NOT ASHAMED.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Unfortunately there is one thing we disagree on. Evolution is real. God made evolution. He created dinosaurs. He did create Adam and Eve. God created everything. But I genuinely think that Bill Nye is a paid actor! I am both an evolutionist and a creationist.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Don't read this, batman. This was when I was a pro-evolutionist. I am now a pro-creationist.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Hmmm, just two days ago you believed in evolution. What made you change your mind?
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

batman---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

It is alright. You are my friend, srtrnc. No worries. I am glad you are enlightened as a pro creationist.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Evolution has not be debunked. Creationists have won a few debates against science communicators, but all that proves is the creationists were better at debating.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Evolution has been debunked and will continue to be debunked. You do not have the facts hypocrite. You are a snowflake dehumanizing people to mere apes. Your arguments are invalidated and you are silenced.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Then, how do you explain the scientific consensus on evolution? Calling me a snowflake is ad hominem.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Darwinian evolutionists are subjective and liars as Jesus prophesied there would be liars and false prophets etc. DNA never proved that Darwin was right about how humans have a common ancestry of the neanderthal.DNA in fact, proves we are linked directly to Adam & Eve:https://source.wustl.edu/2020/06/can-science-prove-adam-eve-really-existed/ "Sciencerules" debunked once again and his rant in fact shows just as how blindly ignorant he is. I am absolute and have won this debate. "Sciencerules' will continously receive zero leniency in this debate. Victory belongs to God.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Seriously slavery is okay in the New Testament? "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6 Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. 7 Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not people,"No wonder why America has a long horrific and tragic tradition of chattel slavery.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Spoken like a wannabe king, not a pursuer of truth.Once upon a time, a banished monk came to the king to discuss their old disagreement. The king stood from his throne, irate, and pronounced, "Fairies HAVE been debunked and will continue to be debunked. You do not have the facts, hypocrite. You are a snowflake humanizing dragonflies. Your arguments are invalidated and you are silenced. Begone!"Jokes aside, your failure is a shame. I too find evolution to be false. For the sake of next time, please take some advice. You are passionate. Reason and understanding are persuasive when spoken kindly. Insults, deaf assertions, and word salads are quite the opposite.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

You are indeed a liar and a hypocrite. I have all truths on my side, while you don't. You are indeed a joke. Speak for yourself, snowflake. Your arguments are all invalidated. I have spoken absolute objective truths. There are only 2 genders; male and female. Gender/sex cannot be changed. Marriage and true love is only between a real man and a real woman. Children are being hunted down and being mutilated. You support that eh? There is no truth within yourself, you retarded pedophile. You think you have any truth? No, judging from how much you are offended, you are weak, you are stupid, you are the biggest example of the laughing stock in society. You are hereby charged with hypocrisy, pedophilia, pride, hubris, adultery and possibly murder. You will be hunted and executed by the law. You are weak, Dan Blayde and you are the most pathetic beta I have ever seen. Cry me a river and get over it.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Spoken like the hypocrite that you are, banished from Heaven, banished from earth, banished from common sense. Your hypocrisy is exposed and you are declared a degenerate that will be shot on sight.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

> uldn't apes be humans todayThe apes back then have evolved into a variety of other apes. Including humans.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Surely it's possible to base a religion on scientific facts as well as on myths, such a worshipping electricity.As for the bit about entropy, I believe evolution could already be on a downward spiral and the creation of life was merely a process that took place from conversion of energy, the process of a lifeform creating a more complex lifeform such as a human being was only a temporary process and is already leading to humans reaching a point of degradation and degeneration. Surely it must be possible for entropy to still allow for the creation of cells to evolve and simply bind together to form more complex arrays initially only for the process to eventually collapse at it's peak. Can smaller organisms live long enough through the generations to adapt stably at first to then eventually collapse due to the stability becoming less viable as more progress occurs.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Worshipping electricity? Does this sound like 40K Warhammer to you? Nay! God isn't some mechanical being. He is a physical being beyond this world. Jesus was of the flesh and He was the Son of God. He remains so this day. God the Father also has a physical self, not of electric parts because that is just wrong. Are we cybermen? NO! Than is God electric? NO!
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

> First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen.Of course we have seen it happen. Wolf to chihuahua in 200 years? How much do you think it can change in several million? Lol
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Henry M. Morris is a doctor of civil engineering. Why do you think he would know about evolution? Very strange source to choose.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

It is funny that you have no IQ and you blather nothing but nonsensical nonsense, which makes you insane and a mental retard. You are a hypocrite if you say anything more because you have no truth. Since then, you will be transferred from Blackgate Prison to Arkham Asylum.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: True

Thanks for the arguments Atrag. :) I am done arguing with DrBatman. Let me know if you want me to ban DrBatman from this debate, I am the debate moderator.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Who are you asking to ban batman? It's not right to expect someone to get banned just because a specific person said so. It's against free speech.
Debate: Is evolution true or false?
Side: False

Your arguments continue to prove to be useless, invalidated and non factual. Your delusions make you a degenerate and because you are a degenerate, you are envious and because you are envious, you dehumanize the entire human race. This makes you a clown and a dead one at that because you have been throwing bomb threats at Target for parents defending their kids from your perversions. Evolution has long been debunked and you are mad that it didn't work out. You will now proceed towards being impaled as atraag is a dead fag walking.