azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Okay. Then please explain to me, if you don't care about either side, why it is acceptable for Israel to rearm but isn't acceptable for Hamas to rearm?Because Israel won. It's like going to see a football game and the loosing side just keep on making plays when the game is over. It's quite annoying. The losers should just get used to the idea that they lost, get over it and move on with their lives. As it stands right now, lives are being lost needlessly. Hamas can't win. What the hell do they expect; for every Jewish man, woman and child to pack their bags and leave? That's just not going to happen. The reason I seem pro-Israel is because I see the terrorist as being mentally challenged. They are fighting a war that has already been lost using a tactic that has no chance in hell of being successful. I see them as being total idiots. It would be easier for me to sympathize with them if they would just do something that I can relate to like capitulating, signing a treaty and start building a Palestinian state. But as it is, I just find it hard, at best, to side with stubborn, mule headed, fanatics.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Powerful logic Joe you should be at the next Isreal and Palestine negotiations people really need to hear your views.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I would just go over there and say to them, "Look, you don't like them and they sure as hell don't like you. So why don't you just go to an all out war. Last man standing wins. That way we don't have to hear either one of your people bitching and complaining about anything. I'm tired of the crap and I don't want to hear it anymore. I don't care."
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Why on earth to you create debating topics about terrorism (or what you percieve terrorism to be) if you dont care. You spend alot of time deabting these issues and when someone corners you in an argument you say "i dont care" to get out of it, your a sad man.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I create these debates because it attracts people like you ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Well maybe you take them a little bit more seriously, you may learn something.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Even if I were to take my debates seriously, I would still find it nearly impossible to take you seriously. Seriously, you're a joke ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Ha, i love it, seriously man, thats fuckin good, you do amuse me Joe, if nothin else. Do you think your insults have any effect on me,i mean really.You my friend are just a blind evolutionary function incapable of extracting yourself in any way from the culture into which you've indocrtrinated. I know we all products of our culture but you my friend are unbeleivable, sitting in your big house writing this stuff down, you must really think you have things figured out, dont you. Ha, seriously man i love it, i do. Keep um comin Joe.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

As a matter of fact, I do live in a big house. You're very astute, CB ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Thanks, i try you know. I try so hard, you know deep down inside im just craving other peoples approval, i dont what id do without. Its like an aphrodisiac for me, you know, like when i read your comment there i immediately noticed an increase in the blood flow to my penis, its throbbing and pulsating a little bit now.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Are you sure that it is not the reference to a camel that's making you hard ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

That was pretty fuckin good now i have to admit.;):);):);)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I try : )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Actually, CB is what my Iraqi friends call you. They said that you should never let a camel into your tent because they are so stupid they bump into everything. They said you were the camel and CD was the tent. And after dealing with you, I have to agree with them. You are stupid. Hence your new nick name, CB ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Well im sorry but suppose ill have to disagree with you and your rich Iraqis friends. To be honest after dealing with you ive given up on the belief that older people have a richer understanding of life. I never really beleived it fully anyway but you've completely destroyed it.You my friend have a very one sided view of the world and you dont how to react to anyone who thinks any different. By you calling stupid, ha, i love it. Keep um comin buddy.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I really don't have a once sided world view. I only come across that way because of your one-sided view of America. Why don't you tell me about all the good America has done around the world.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

It depends on what you view as good. Like America is responsible for advancing technology in ways that arent comparable to any country. Actually i dont need to tell when you asked me that question i type it into google and the first hit was this youtube video. It shows some of the great things your country has done. I acknowledge your country has done good things (again i appy that definition loosely) but they're completely unrelated to the kinds of things we've been discussing, you' know what i mean if you watch the video.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lkpI9H6s_A
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

It depends on what you view as good. Like America is responsible for advancing technology in ways that arent comparable to any country. Actually i dont need to tell when you asked me that question i type it into google and the first hit was this youtube video. It shows some of the great things your country has done. I acknowledge your country has done good things (again i appy that definition loosely) but they're completely unrelated to the kinds of things we've been discussing, you' know what i mean if you watch the video.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lkpI9H6s_A BTW i acknowledge that this isnt even close to a comprehensive list of all rthe good things America has done just incase you think it is.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

OK. So what's the problem? No one is perfect and you have to take the good with the bad. ;)Name one country that would do better. I mean, you fault every country. so name one that would do better.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

NO country would do better that not the point, if were ever going to prgress we have to stop the lies and acknowledge exactly what is going on. Your country needs to stop the facade and the hipocracy otherwise things will only continue as they have done. Can't you see that without truth bad things will happen, like im sure there are many in your country that would supprt war with Iran even though it would be completely unjustified. If you beleiev all the lies they tell you and you dont question their actions your giving free reign to commit their crimes.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

So Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants only to create electricity. He does NOT want an atom bomb. The fact that he refuses to have another country provide fuel for his electricity generating nuclear reactor is of no consequence. The fact that he has thousands of centrifuges creating weapons grade nuclear fuel is purely fictional propaganda. Every country that thinks that Iran is trying to build a nuclear bomb is participating in American propaganda. He loves Israel and he would not consider attacking Israel. He has no ties to terrorists who would love to get their hands on a nuclear bomb and detonate it on American soil.Is this pretty much what you believe?Let me put it to you this way. I don't give a fuck what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad thinks or wants. I don't want him to have weapons grade nuclear capability. I sleep better at night knowing that there's one less person I have to worry about whether or not he wants to detonate a nuclear weapon on American soil. For all I know he shares your view that America is the largest terrorist organization on the planet. If that's the case, he may not be like you; he may be more inclined to attack the U.S. I don't want to take that chance and find out.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

No he wants the bomb, you can be sure of that. I dont want them to have it but unlike you i know they only want it for leaverage, they know if they ever used it on Isreal they be destroyed, again give these people some credit, they have richer history than anyone one this planet, the Meospotamian culture was the advanced civilisation when our decendents were shittin in hands and throwing at each other (exaggerated obviously), the Persian culture as well was ahead of it time, ive been to the country, they are a cultured people, much more so than those in your country, you can be sure of it. These are not stupid people and despite how the country has been portrayed in your media its quite a free society, i honestly beleive if America wasnt so agressive towards them the theocracy would have fallen out of favour a long time ago but you see Iran has a lot of leaverage even withou the bomb, they control alot of oil, they have lot of influence in the region, they missiles positiioned all alon there coast at the gulf oil wells, they can literally shut off the oil supply completely if attack. This is where they get there leverage.You see i agree with eberything you wrote your problem, and in my opnion every Americans problem is that they want there position in the world to be completely assured i.e. they want to hold all the cards, they want complete safety and power at the same time and your willing to do horrible things to other people in order to obtain it. Even what you just wrtoe leads me to beleive you would not oppose an invasion on Iran if your country was able to drum up enough phony evidence alla Iraq WMDs. You have no right to invade that country and kill the beautiful (yes the are incredibly beautiful, look up some of their women, unbeleivable) and cultured people of Iran, and you should have insight to realise you have no right.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

they know if they ever used it on Isreal they be destroyedYes, so all they have to do is get some of it to some terrorist group and let them do the deed. I mean, it's not like the bomb is going to say on it, "Made in Iran." and even if it does say that, there won't be much of it left once it blows up.Regardless, I don't think we should give them the chance to get that kind of leverage. The consequences could be.... you guessed it, one million dead ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You have no idea i biased you are do you. YOu probbaly think your not but beleive me you are. And its pretty bad to.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You know what, you have no idea how biased you are, do you? You probably think you are not but believe me, you are. And it's pretty sad to. Especially since you are supposed to be a scientist. Maybe you did not mean a good scientist. Maybe you meant a mediocre scientist ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You incapable of seeing your own folly arent you, and as a defense mechanism you through back the exact same argument to the person that has made the initial claim. Ive read through this debate and i can see im not alone in my frustration.First of all does what happened to the isreali army justified killing 1200 hundred civilians in cold.Think about it. 400 children too young to even know fuilly what was going on were killed in cold blood.White phosphurous was poured on them from above. Im a chemical engineering let me educate you on white phosphurous.It burns at over 600 celsius (that will burn the flesh right off your bones). When i lands on you its incredibly hard to remove, its got adhesive properties, its like a glue. If you put water on it, it speeds up the reaction and you get burned faster.Isreal was using this with U.S. backing even though its banned under the rules of war, they even denied it while it was being done and didnt leave any journalists into the area.You would have been a fine footsoldier in the Nazi army my friend, supporting actions like these without question.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Your constant whining makes me want to join the army just so that I can put you out of your misery ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Your constant whining makes me want to join the army just so that I can put you out of your misery ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Call it what you what you want, and by the way i'd like to see ya try, really i would.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I told my Iranian friends to read some of your stuff and one of them thinks you're a raving lunatic. The other one thinks you're a pussy ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You have Iranian friends. You never mentioned that previously. Let me ask you this are they part of the diaspora that (elites just like Mubaraks or any other country you've tried to control, there are loads) fled the country when the theocracy was established. I think almost 1 millioni of these Iranians were given asylm in the US along with the brutal dictator the Sha, who they no doubtedly supported. Cause if they are (and i have no doubt they are) its a bit rich calling me a pussy considering they grew fat on their own peoples backs and then abandoned their conuntry at the first sign of danger. Fuck them its becasue of people like them that they kind of hardship institued by the regimes propped up by washington was ever allowed to come into being. They're opinions are probably just as twisted as yours.You know you can say what you like up there on your pedestle but the reality is your rich iraqis friends and your Iranians friends are the people dont speak for the majority despite what you'd like to beleive. I'm sure if i showed my "mad rantings" as you called them to most well read Iraqis and Iranians they'd agree wholeheartedly with my assessment.And i dont just tell myself that to make myself feel better, ok Joe. I able to tell my self that becasue i have a little thing called factual evidence backing me up and a sprinkling of common sense which is an alien concept to you.It doesnt take a genious to work out that most Iraqis are quite unhappy with America. At least the non elites, but im sure you know non of them, don you Joe. It also doesnt take a genious to work out that most Iranianshate America (again not the fuckin elites that allowed America to come into the country and prop up the Sha, and which then insured an era of inequality begun, and then high talied it out of there when the majority rose up) Ive been to Iran with my parents and we met many Iranians and lots of open minded students over there. Unbeleivably friendly peopel, they all hate the American government(FOR VERY GOOD FUCKING REASONS), many arent even religious.If you think these peopel will call what i say the rantings of lunatic your only deluding yourself.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

That was a typo. I do not have Iranian friends, I have Iraqi friends.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Then go live with them. Birds of a feather should flock together. But before you go, are you trying to tell me that there is no possibility that the only reason the American government back people like the Sha is because the middle east has always been a violent place (tribes constantly fighting each other). And that getting oil to the market on time from a place where there is constant fighting is difficult at best. That countries need a reliable source of oil. That governments are lazy and if someone says that they can stop the fighting and get the oil to market on time, then those countries are going to support that man until he proves incapable of making sure the oil gets to market on time.I mean, doesn't the paragraph above makes more sense and sounds more reasonable than, "American corporations enjoy killing brown people and stealing their oil!"
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You were doing OK until the end where you ran afoul of one of Godwin's corollaries which states that "once a comparison is made to Hitler or Nazis, whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Actually if you had done your reasearch and not listnened to what you are told from your governement you would know that it is Isreal who broke the ceasefire. They went onto the edge of the Gaza strip and killed 4 hahas militants (this wasnt widely reported but its the truth, i didnt make it up it what happened and has been documented.Again, look it up (if your capable). Then Isreal responds by massacuring 1400 people, 1200 of which were civilians,400 of which were children. They dropped white Phosphurous on civilians. This illegal to use even against a military force in war (not that this was a war, as it so called).
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

The problem here is that you either think that I care or you think that you can make me care or you think that if I just read your silly little links that I would care..... I don't care. I'm just sorry they didn't get you ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Now whos the angry man?, sorry they didnt get me, fuckin hell, is that what you want to do to all the people who disagree witht the U.S.,wipe them out?.Well let me tell your wishes are being carried out as we speak. I wish i could drag you over to a country made desolate by the U.S. and show you some of the suffering first hand that your country has created, i wonder would you come out with the same nationalistic propaganda then. You make me sick.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

I'm beginning to think that all of your friends are doing something about it like blowing themselves up and you want to do something about it but you are too scared so you come to this site to complain so that you can tell yourself that you are doing something about it and make yourself feel better about being such a little chicken shit. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Ya, thats its you have me completely figured out. Fuckin hell man how do you do that, you should be a fortune teller or something, there's money to be made. Your right all my friends are out blowing themselves up, oh, i think i hear one go off there as im typing. Ah well he had a good run, so much for the trainstation.I'm such a little chicken shit, if only i had your big sweaty american balls then id have the confidence to anything hijack a plan with carton of butter and fly it right into the empire state building.Someday maybe, a man can dream.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Lol ;)You're funny ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You sound really angry and once that happens, you lost. This is exactly what joe wanted and you fell into his trap. Take it from me, you can't change joe's mind because he doesn't care. You're just wasting your time. Ask anybody that has been on this site for a long time. The best thing to do is ignore him.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

I have to reiterate im not angry, really im not.Look it probably seems that way cause im a fair passionate but also very very blunt person. I'm not tryin to change his mind, but im pretty confident i can destroy anything he says.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

The only way to beat a stick is with a bigger stick. We have the bigger stick, but for some reason we aren't using it. Let's show those terrorists the same thing we showed Germany when we ended WWII! All that patriotism and force that put America on top should not be going to waste now. We need to end the war on terror once and for all. The only thing stopping us from doing that are those damned liberals who think that non-violence is the answer.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: smart vs dumb wars

What do you mean "we aren't using it"? Ever heard of this little thing called the War in Afghanistan?There aren't many liberals who think that non-violence will work on terrorists.Obama represents the mainstream liberal view: Obama's Iraq Speech
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

So is Obama gonna open up a can of whoop ass on the terrorists?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: smart vs dumb wars

Well that will depend on the circumstances. The world is a complicated place - one cannot simply open cans of whoop ass whenever one feels like it. I trust Obama will take the best course of action when dealing with terrorists.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

And the best course of action when dealing with terrorists is to open up a can of whoop ass (;
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: smart vs dumb wars

No, Joe, it's not that simple. Before engaging in any conflict we need to ask ourselves, is it worth the cost?Was the invasion of Iraq really worth $600 billion (and growing)? What else could we have done with that money?Was it worth the 4000 dead Americans?Was it worth the 1,000,000+ dead Iraqis?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding NO

yeah freedoms not worth that
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: smart vs dumb wars

Al-Queda never threatened our freedom. In order to take away our freedom, they'd need an army big enough to wipe out ours and set up their own government. They don't have anywhere near the power to do that.Your sarcastic comment makes no sense.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I i agree with you completely Joe America should be bombed back to oblivion to give them a taste of their own medicine, whats that i hear you saying, your not right or left or liberal or conservative.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

See, that's where you and I differ. When 9/11 happened, I did not go on CD to complain about 9/11. I supported my government to go out there and bomb the shit out of Afghanistan. And they haven't come back ;)