azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

First, by definition it isn't plagiarized.Second, don't pretend that you would suddenly stop banning people if they stopped posting on the ban-free versions of your debates.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

The courts would tell you that because you are given credit as the author of the quotes in question, it is by definition (and legally) not plagiarism.And there won't be duplicate debates of anyone's but yours because you are the only one banning everyone. This is a self made problem.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

How about I just start copying any argument you make and then when people do not respond to your argument because they opened the plagiared one firstThe only people responding to the other debates are people you have banned from yours. And we are making legitimate responses to the topics.And you are now being credited in these debates, so those who click on the other debate first will still be able to understand that it is your words and ideas. Literally the only difference is a lack of censorship amidst the discussion.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Hogwash, how would any person know which argument to go to. Typical liberal spin to always make whatever you do to be ok. I can tell you that I will always keep you on ban as long as you keep going to the plagiarized argument to post.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Then stop banning people and he will stop making the duplicates. That's all there is to it.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

I can tell you that I will always keep you on ban as long as you keep going to the plagiarized argument to post.Well, if I am not banned from your debate, I won't go to the repost. I wasn't going to the reposts when I wasn't banned unless there was a discussion there that I wished to add to. Since I can no longer contribute to the debates you make but still wish to respond to you, I have no option but to go to the ban-free reposts.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Yes, you have plenty of options of going to other debates. Are you saying my arguments are the only one's that you must debate? I feel flattered.Let me say that if you banned me from your arguments, I would not waste one second trying to weasle my way into debating you. I would simply go to another argument.I am not fixated on you or your arguments.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Due to the few number of conservatives creating dates on this site, I really do enjoy reading and responding to your perspective. And when others create debates, I do respond to those, too. And I am aware you aren't fixating on my arguments. That's why you continue to ignore my questions regarding the debate that you're in right now.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

It's nice you admit how few conservatives are on this site. Maybe it's because they are stalked and ridiculed at every turn.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

It's nice you admit how few conservatives are on this site. Maybe it's because they are stalked and ridiculed at every turn.The only thing you get ridiculed for is your constant insults and the fact that you ban the people who are actually responding to you. No one is 'lying.' They just disagree with you on some fundamental issues. Which we would like to talk about with you. Which is why we're on a debate site. if you're not willing to talk to the other members of this site about these issues, then go elsewhere.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

If you are not willing to follow the rules, go to another site. We have the ban feature for people who stalk others and become a complete waste of time! Honor those rules! You are not as bad as Generic but getting there very fast.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

This is a site designed for debate, discussion, and argument over different topics. In what way is it stalking to respond to you? If you don't want people to respond to you, this is the wrong place to be.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Now let me get this straight ok? According to YOUR understanding of the rules, only people who are obscene or derogatory can get banned.So if someone threatens you, or is repeatedly deceptive to you, or stalks your every word, or plagiars your argument, or copies and pastes the same words over and over to ruin the argument, or for a hundred other reasons, they can not be banned in all YOUR definition of the rules?Gee I wonder why I ban you.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

According to YOUR understanding of the rules, only people who are obscene or derogatory can get banned.That wasn't my interpretation, that was me quoting the site. You can read up on my source here: http://www.createdebate.com/about/faqI don't necessarily agree with those rules, was just pointing out what the site said. And to your situations:So if someone threatens youBan them, maybe report them. If you feel unsafe, then take action.or is repeatedly deceptive to youUm, what? Who is being 'deceptive' to you? Are you referring to people who go off-topic? You do that all the time. or stalks your every wordYou're posting to an online, public, forum. How can this possible merit censorship? or copies and pastes the same words over and over to ruin the argumentBy 'ruin the argument' do you mean, counter it? Respond to it? or for a hundred other reasons, they can not be banned in all YOUR definition of the rulesIn my mind, you should ban someone if they are being offensive, derogatory, or are spamming with unrelated topics. A majority of people you ban don't do that. If someone isn't agreeing with you're points, they aren't denying the obvious. They just disagree with what you think is obvious. And you being unable to convince them is not a reason to ban them. Cuaroc is not plagiarizing you when he credits you at the bottom of his debates. Plagiarism is taking someone else's words/ideas and presenting them as your own. Cuaroc is no longer doing that. And his reasons for doing as are perfectly justified. Gee I wonder why I ban you.Me too.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

I am down to banning only three people. Gee, I must give the people who are not stalkers a second chance.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Thanks for not responding to any of those points. Anyways, it is well within your right to ban those you want. But that doesn't make it justified. And if those people whose voices you want to silence want to respond to you, it is well within their right to find another avenue. Plagiarism is not happening, since Cuaroc is not trying to use your words as his own.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Keep right on excusing it as I keep right on banning you.......................................
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

I don't excuse it when he doesn't credit you. When he identifies you as the original poster, it is not plagiarism, and as such, I have nothing to excuse.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Keep supporting people who copy other's arguments when told not to do so. If someone tells a person NOT to copy his arguments and then the person keeps doing so anyways? I will never stop banning you for that very reason.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

If someone tells a person NOT to copy his arguments and then the person keeps doing so anyways?That's not plagiarism, while it is morally wrong. However, I would equally argue that constantly insulting, accusing of being liars, and censoring voices is also morally wrong. The copying is merely a response to such actions. .Here are some things you have called/said to those you disagree with on this site:"DILERIOUS""What is wrong with you?""rude teens and childish posters""only deaths caused by guns bother Democrats" "you probably drink as do most Politicians.""hypocrisy and total lunacy""fanatics""a complete waste of time""lacking humanity""radical extremists with the morals of Communists""bigot""too young to even know what you are talking about""HYPOCRITES!""LOL, IGNORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" "brain dead""fool""YOU COMPLETE MORON!""HORRENDOUS!""stalker""you mindless moron!""Typical left wing idiot bigots""FOOL!""a total liar""ignorant""simple minded tool""LOL,can Liberals be any more stupid.""This shows your true passions and it is not caring for the discriminated.""no one ever accused Liberals as being of average intellect.""extremist""controlling fanatic""racists""phonies"You got upset that those who banned still found ways to "ruin my arguments" ... read that back to yourself. I could go on, as you've said plenty worse. .In trying to explain why there are so few conservatives on this site, you said "Maybe it's because they are stalked and ridiculed at every turn."You are ridiculing others far more than anyone else here. If anyone said anything remotely like what you say to them, how would you respond? You say you ban people for being vulgar. Well, you should probably ban yourself from all of your debates. .Do you know what the definition of 'bigot' is? It's a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. Merriam-Webster. Do you not see how that perfectly describes your behavior on this site?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

I stand by most every word I have written and if you don't like them then ban me. That should be your right to do so!I guess my words are not too insulting since you stalk my every argument. I insult those who insult me and guess what? I'm not perfect and never claimed to be so. I get angry as do you and sometimes I make insults as do you.I've made my decision how to deal with people who stalk me and deceive me and refuse to ever admit if they are wrong. I ban them when they start wasting my time, or are vulgar or childish, etc. and I suggest you do the same.I debated you on many issues and when it became very apparent we would never agree and you would just keep posting over and over on the same things, hogging the argument, there was nothing else to do but ban. Live with it!I'm capable of creating a debate (not copying it) if I want to continue debating the topic.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

I've made my decision how to deal with people who stalk me and deceive me You've been using the language long before you started accusing others of stalking and lying. And I have no problem with you insulting, that's what you expect when you go on an online forum. But you then claim you ban people for being vulgar. Can you honestly say that if I said any of the things I quoted earlier that you wouldn't ban me? That's I think a pretty clear example of hypocrisy.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

HOW MANY TIMES HAVE I TOLD YOU TO BAN ME IF I DO SOMETHING YOU DON'T LIKE? That is how you can keep people from doing things you object to. If I have offended you in the past and you baned me for it, just maybe i would not do the same thing in the future. That's the old tried and true accountbility for one's actions. It works.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

The overwhelming majority of people on this website would rather talk through something rather than stifle the speech of someone for trivial matters.Additionally, have you by any chance read my proposition? It is on a debate topic titled Proposition to FromWithin.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

No, I actually don't have any problem with vulgarity, as long as no one is in danger. I think it is morally wrong, but as I am against censorship, I see no reason to ban anyone unless they are spamming with unrelated material.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

So do you believe there is a single person on this website that responds to you but isn't stalking you?Because it sure seems like any time a person responds to you more then once, you assume they must be stalking you.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

If someone tells a person NOT to copy his arguments and then the person keeps doing so anyways?Sorry but that's not the definition of plagiarism.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Ah so now you will also ban people if they respond to your comments.Funny.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

We have the ban feature for people who stalk others and become a complete waste of time!That is absolutely not the case. In the site's FAQ, Andy writes that if you were banned: "You must have posted an obscene or derogatory comment on the debate (shame on you)." That is the only reason the site presents for banning. Where did you get that idea in your head?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Can you please explain to people why responding to your comments on a website designed for the discussion and arguing of differing opinions is stalking?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

That is just sad, and very much illegal. Acting as a different identity is quite illegal and could land you in prison.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

No it couldn't.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Look up the recent occurrences that have happened to people who act under another identity on the Internet. There have been people who have been shot and killed (Heck though he made to many sudden movements but it is very much illegal)...
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

He has not committed a crime according to that statute but thanks for making me read a shit load of irrelevant text!!
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

I added the whole thing because I didn't want to be called out for hiding bits of the document... But yes he is very much committing a crime as stated in the first and second part of it... It says that false documents are illegal... Definition of document=A piece of written, printed, or electronic matter... Does it need to be anymore clearer then that?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

This paragraph defines what an identity document is:the term “false identification document” means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that—(A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and(B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization;
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Facepalm Does FromWithin/Outlaw60 have permission from the government to be doing what he is doing?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Also it doesn't define what an identity document is it only states when it is acceptable...
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Urg how old are you? This is stupid. Okay I will reduce the size of the quote even more:means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals thatIs a post on the internet a document commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals????
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

1. I'm 13, and I would much appreciate it if you don't pull a FromWithin and completely bash me for my age.2. Not a post but FromWithin claiming not to be Outlaw60 (If he truly is) would be undertaking a different and false identity.3. Technically that statement would mean that all usernames that are not your first/middle/last name is illegal.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

The act you quoted is about producing falsw documents. You might be right that it is technically illegal but what you have quoted is about producing fake ID.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Ok well I'm sorry to provide the wrong evidence... Obviously it is hard to trust the internet because the exact words I looked up were..."Laws Against False Internet Identity"And this document was the first thing to come up... I will look for the law that is against creating a false Internet identity.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

And I meant to put that on clarification mode...
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

So if someone beats their child out of love, it is justified?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Hey total hypocrite, I want you to replace the word "beat " in your last post with "KILL"!Then just maybe you will start to get some semblance of a brain and see your fanatical hypocrisy.So is killing their child out of love justified? That's abortion you FOOL!
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

So is killing their child out of love justified? That's abortion you FOOL!Please. If you think all abortions are done out of love for the child, then you know nothing of the circumstances and reasons women get abortions. And you never answered my question, which is the point of this argument (not abortion.) If someone beats a child out of love, is that ok? You said that you think spanking is ok for that reason, so does it expand to beating?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

No, does it expand to killing the Baby? I wll not answer another lame question until you answer is it ok to kill unborn Babies for any reason at any stage and then is it ok to allow a baby born alive from a bothced abortion to die with no prevention to save it's lfe.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

How immature. You refuse to respond to what people say and expect everyone to respond your nonsensical insinuations which, as has already been explained to you, people don't support.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

I wll not answer another lame question until you answer is it ok to kill unborn Babies for any reason at any stage and then is it ok to allow a baby born alive from a bothced abortion to die with no prevention to save it's lfe.If you wanted to talk about abortion, you should have gone to an abortion debate. I will answer your question because I want an answer to mine, but please try and stay on topic. Contrary to the debates you create, more than one issue exists.is it ok to kill unborn Babies for any reason at any stageThose on the pro-choice side in general believe that a fetus is not equivalent to a living human. As such, your premise is not an appropriate way to approach this discussion. .Now will you please answer the question of the debate? You said that spanking is ok because it is done out of love. In your mind, how does that differ from other crimes done out of love? Such as beating, murder, stealing, etc.? If it's done out of love, by your logic, it should be ok. If that is not your logic, please clarify why you think spanking is ok.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

LOL, IGNORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You won't answer questions when you know it shows your inhumanity and the inhumanity of those you elect.You would rther talk about spanking. GET REAL!
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

LOL, IGNORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quality debating skills right there.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

I did answer your question. Read. And if you didn't want to talk about spanking, you shouldn't have come to this debate. However, it seems to me like you don't have an argument here, which would signify that you have lost this debate. Which is about spanking. Would you like to address the difference between spanking and beating, which should have been why you came to this debate?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

I did answer your question. Read.I don't understand how saying that the pro choice movement thinking something answers his question that you quoted. He is asking about what you believe and your answer didn't even really answer it for pro choice people. How did you answer the question?
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Good point. Replace the words 'the pro choice movement' with I.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

He answered your question. You don't even bother to read comments before responding to them, as you have just demonstrated.
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: No

Abortion relates directly to your question because it is killing a baby and you have the hypocritical nerve to judge people who would spank their child? I CAN NOT DEBATE THAT KIND OF DENIAL!
Debate: Should a parent who plans on spanking their child be allowed to have foster children?
Side: Yes

Abortion relates directly to your question because it is killing a baby and you have the hypocritical nerve to judge people who would spank their child?Ok, so do what I'm doing. Talk about both abortion and spanking.