azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

You know stem-cells? You know what it is?Stem-cells have the ability to turn into other cells - like sperm-cells.Stem-cells you can find in almost anything. Like skin, which makes your skin a potential for developing into a human beingYes. But skin and saliva by itself will not replicate cells and become a human. It doesnt have the potential. Skin by itself dies. I dont see why you even claim it to have potential.So we shouldn't abort fetuses because it is an organism?This isnt about abortion. We are discussing if the fetus is a human or not.I mostly go by the brain and consciousness. If you're missing both those things I would not consider you a human being.Again an unconscious man isnt human by your logic and the baby born without a brain isnt human either. That isnt a proper way to judge a human. People with mental disorders or who have brain injuries are less human by your logic. That isnt a fair way to determine what is a human.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Yes. But skin and saliva by itself will not replicate cells and become a humanThat doesn't take away the potential life.Skin by itself dies.But whilst alive it has the potential. I dont see why you even claim it to have potential.Because it contains stem-cells, which can turn into sperm-cells, and sperm-cells are potential lives.This isnt about abortion. We are discussing if the fetus is a human or not.Okay, it doesn't really take away my point anyways so let me ask again. The fact that the fetus is an organism, is that enough for you to call it ''human'' ?Again an unconscious man isnt human by your logic and the baby born without a brain isnt human either. That isnt a proper way to judge a human. People with mental disorders or who have brain injuries are less human by your logic. That isnt a fair way to determine what is a human.No, I never said an unconscious man isn't human.I said if your missing both a brain and consciousness, then in my opinion, you are not a human being.And brain injury - no that is not what I said.A man with a brain injury still has a brain, that is what makes him human.Human beings can be defected. Do you have a brain? Do you have a consciousness? If yes to both, you are human.Do you have a human brain and no consciousness? Still human.Do you have no human brain, but somehow still a conscious? Then you must be human.Do you have no human brain and no consciousness? Then no, I don't think you are a human being.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

That doesn't take away the potential life.Yes. Yes it does actually. In adult they are only used to repair the body or replenish tissue. Not become it's own organism.But whilst alive it has the potential.You are not understanding a stem cell. The stem cells of skin are used to repair damage to the skin not make an entire organism.Because it contains stem-cells, which can turn into sperm-cells, and sperm-cells are potential lives.Sperm cells are not potential lives. Sperm cells die in about a few days after their creation and when they go to the egg they just transfer DNA. Okay, it doesn't really take away my point anyways so let me ask again. The fact that the fetus is an organism, is that enough for you to call it ''human'' ?What other kind of organism is it? It is a human organism and just a human being. You are an organism. A fetus is an organism. A fetus is a human being.No, I never said an unconscious man isn't human.You said the fetus isn't conscious and thus weighed humanness on consciousness.I said if your missing both a brain and consciousness, then in my opinion, you are not a human being.Again. So the child born without a brain in not a human? That is a little mean. Weighing consciousness shouldn't determine if you are human. A man with a brain injury still has a brain, that is what makes him human.So a human has to have a brain? Is that really correct? Almost every species on earth has a brain. Almost every species. Are they more human depending on brain size or something?Do you have a brain? Do you have a consciousness? If yes to both, you are human.Do you have a human brain and no consciousness? Still human.Do you have no human brain, but somehow still a conscious? Then you must be human.Do you have no human brain and no consciousness? Then no, I don't think you are a human being.Honestly that isn't even a fair system of judgement. Obviously the fetus is still human. You are just saying that a brain and consciousness makes you a human. There is no definitive answer to what makes a human a human. I guess it goes by opinion. According to you though the baby born without a brain isn't human which I find very saddening.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Yes. Yes it does actually. In adult they are only used to repair the body or replenish tissue. Not become it's own organism.That is falseYou are not understanding a stem cell. The stem cells of skin are used to repair damage to the skin not make an entire organism.It has the ability to turn into other cells, so yes. I understand enough of stem-cells to know that they are able to turn into sperm. There have been experiments on it-Sperm cells are not potential lives.Yes they areSperm cells die in about a few days after their creation and when they go to the egg they just transfer DNA. Just because something dies doesn't take away their ability whilst alive. Everything dies - in those few days sperm is alive, it has the potential to create life. A potential life.What other kind of organism is it? It is a human organism and just a human being. You are an organism. A fetus is an organism. A fetus is a human being.A plant is an organism - what's your point?You said the fetus isn't conscious and thus weighed humanness on consciousness.That was about half of the entire sentence I said. Don't say I said something I didn't say.Again. So the child born without a brain in not a human? That is a little mean. Weighing consciousness shouldn't determine if you are human. Again - if you are missing BOTH. BOTH for god's sakes. Not one, both.If you are missing both, I wouldn't consider you a human being.Almost every species on earth has a brain. Almost every species. Are they more human depending on brain size or something?Only one specie has a human brain.Obviously the fetus is still human.I never said it wasn't.There is no definitive answer to what makes a human a human.I didn't say that there is. I just said I wouldn't consider a thing without consciousness or a human brain a human being.According to you though the baby born without a brain isn't human which I find very saddening.No, that is apparently what you understood by my statement, which also is saddening.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

That is falseOkay then. Since you deny fact. Show me an instance where an adult's stem cells becomes an entire organism. It cannot. If you make the claim then prove it. I would like to see it. Because if you took biology you would know this.It has the ability to turn into other cells, so yes. I understand enough of stem-cells to know that they are able to turn into sperm. There have been experiments on it-Yes. Sperm is an organism. The cell on its own will not do so. It will replenish what other cells cannot do. That is the point of a stem cell.Yes they areProve it. Potential lives implies that it will become something else. It dies after a few days and dies during fertilization.Just because something dies doesn't take away their ability whilst alive. Everything dies - in those few days sperm is alive, it has the potential to create life. A potential life.Potential life and the potential to create life are two different things. Potential life means that the organism or object will become an functional organism on its own. A sperm cell on its own will not evolve into anything. Yes it has the potential to create life. A plant is an organism - what's your point?My point? This organism came from a Homo sapien. Same for a plant, or fish, or bird, or almost anything. It is a human.That was about half of the entire sentence I said. Don't say I said something I didn't say.That is exactly what you claimed. You said the fetus isnt conscious and so I said you judge humanness by consciousness. Again - if you are missing BOTH. BOTH for god's sakes. Not one, both.If you are missing both, I wouldn't consider you a human being.No. I said that the baby born without a brain isnt a human by your logic. I am positive it is still human regardless of the fact that it has no brain. It is sad to see that you say that that mother's child isn't human. Only one specie has a human brain.Excuse me? I am aware of that. Did I say almost every animal has a "human brain"? No. I said a brain. Not a human brain. I dont even see why you decided to say that.I never said it wasn't.Sorry let me correct myself. It is still a human.I didn't say that there is. I just said I wouldn't consider a thing without consciousness or a human brain a human being.I know. That is why I brought up the bit about the baby being born without a brain. I am 100% positive it is still a human being.No, that is apparently what you understood by my statement, which also is saddening.Umm yes. By your logic it isn't human. It has no brain and isn't conscious. It is sad that you deem it as "not a human". I perfectly understood your belief and I acknowledge it. So I applied your logic to the brainless baby.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Okay then. Since you deny fact. Show me an instance where an adult's stem cells becomes an entire organism. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9587099/Eggs-created-from-stem-cells-in-fertility-breakthrough.html The sperm on its own will not do so.Did I ever say that?Potential life and the potential to create life are two different things. Potential life means that the organism or object will become an functional organism on its own. A sperm cell on its own will not evolve into anything. Yes it has the potential to create life. Does a sperm have the possibility to turn into life?Yes.Potential life.My point? This organism came from a Homo sapien. Same for a plant, or fish, or bird, or almost anything. It is a human.The two bottom layers of skin are organisms too, the top layer is dead organism.And that has human DNA too.That is exactly what you claimed. You said the fetus isnt conscious and so I said you judge humanness by consciousness. No, that is not what I said.No. I said that the baby born without a brain isnt a human by your logic. No, that is not my logic. It is sad to see that you say that that mother's child isn't human. ??? Well .. it's easy to debate when you put false accusations in my mouth.Quote the place I said that a mother's child is not a human, please I beg you.Excuse me? I am aware of that. Did I say almost every animal has a "human brain"?You asked me if every animal with a brain is considered human. I made a point that only human beings have a human brain, and that is what makes them human.That is why I brought up the bit about the baby being born without a brain. I am 100% positive it is still a human being.Do you have proof? Now you made a claim, you have the burden, remember ;)Umm yes. By your logic it isn't human. It has no brain and isn't conscious. It is sad that you deem it as "not a human". I perfectly understood your belief and I acknowledge it. So I applied your logic to the brainless baby.Yes now you said the right thing. But in your argument you say that I don't consider a child without a consciousness a human, and I don't consider a child without a brain a human.This is false, as I numerous times said, that I think when you are missing both those parts, that's when I fail to see it being a human being.Can I ask, out of curiosity, if the brainless baby has a consciousness? I believe it has, since the mother of the brainless baby claims the baby knows when it's mother and when it's the grandmother that holds him. So I believe it has a consciousness, so I think it is a human being.A 5 week old fetus as no brain, has no consciousness, has no organs of any kind. I don't see why it's a human. By stating the obvious point with ''it being an organism'' I fail to see the logic in that, when practically anything alive is an organism. Plants, flies .. cells.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Did I ever say that?Yes. You claimed that it was potential life.I didn't claim it was potential life on it's own, no. potential life and the potential to create life is. What is the difference, tell me? Because I don't think there is. a potential to be life and a potential to create life ... ???Skin is a component of an organism. It is a cluster of well structured cells. Your skin is not an organism. It is simply a component.Anything alive is an organismIt is a organ but not living. The top layer of skin is dead, but the two layers underneath are not.Do I again have to tell you that all I did was apply your logic to the fetus? You said if it isn't conscious or has a brain it isn't human. That is not your original statement of what I said.No I didn't. I made a statement. My question was "Are they more human depending on brain size or something"? I never asked you if every animal with a brain is considered a human.This is your original statement:So a human has to have a brain? Is that really correct? Almost every species on earth has a brain. Almost every species.Anencephaly. That is the term for it. Also like you once said. It has organs. They wouldn't call it a baby if it wasn't human. Again this is only logic. Check this out: http://poetv.com/video.php?vid=109731Doctors call fetuses younger than 21 weeks potential lives, not babies.And a fetus younger than 5 weeks does not have organs, a brain or consciousness and those are the fetuses I'm talking about.Look at wiki and look at symptoms. It is listed that it isn't conscious. By whom? Wikipedia??? Like that is a reliable source.But whatever, no brain and no consciousness?? Not a human being in my opinion.It is alive.Flies are aliveIt’s growingPlants growIt’s developingCaviar develops.My point? The things you've listed aren't proof of a fetus being a human being.It is growing and will grow a brainYou can't prove that.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

I didn't claim it was potential life on it's own, no.This is your statement.Me: Sperm cell are not potential lives.You: Yes they are.Sounds like a claim.What is the difference, tell me? Because I don't think there is. a potential to be life and a potential to create life ... ???Potential life is for the organism itself. When you say it has potential life that means that it has the potential to live. The potential to create life is different. You as a woman have the potential to create life. Anything alive is an organismSkin isn't alive. It is a component. It is like hair. Hair is a component. It is made up of cells. The organism is you.The top layer of skin is dead, but the two layers underneath are not.Your skin isn't "alive". It is a cluster of cells. By itself it will do nothing. It is not alive. It is a component. If you are going to claim it is an organism then show me an article that says skin is an organism.That is not your original statement of what I said.Of course not. I just told you what I did. I explain my actions.This is your original statement:So a human has to have a brain? Is that really correct? Almost every species on earth has a brain. Almost every species.Thank you. You just proved me right. I never asked if animal has a human brain. You just proved me correct.Doctors call fetuses younger than 21 weeks potential lives, not babies.And a fetus younger than 5 weeks does not have organs, a brain or consciousness and those are the fetuses I'm talking about.I never said potential life is what the baby is. I said the child was a human. What are you even saying? By whom? Wikipedia??? Like that is a reliable source.But whatever, no brain and no consciousness?? Not a human being in my opinionWow. Like you could scroll down to check the sources to see if they were telling the truth. Literally. Who takes the time to write fake stuff about Anencephaly?Flies are aliveI was aware of that.Plants growI am aware of that.Caviar develops.My point? The things you've listed aren't proof of a fetus being a human being.Caviar isn't alive and it doesn't grow once made. So making that statement is useless. You can't prove that.Oh okay. Even though as a fetus develops it is supposed to grow a brain. I see. I had no idea that a fetus can't develop a brain. How did you get a brain? It didn't just spawn there. You had to develop you brain as a fetus. A fetus will typically develop a brain.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

I didn't claim it was potential life on it's own, no.This is your statement.Me: Sperm cell are not potential lives.You: Yes they are.Sounds like a claim.That is a claim. But not a claim that sperm is a potential life by itself.Potential life is for the organism itself. When you say it has potential life that means that it has the potential to live. The potential to create life is different. You as a woman have the potential to create life. Okay, do you remember how we got to debate about the potential thing?I'm a little bit confused by now :p I think we got ourselves into a dead end with this debate.Skin isn't alive. It is a component. It is like hair. Hair is a component. It is made up of cells. The organism is you.The top layer is like hair, not the two layers underneath.Your skin isn't "alive". It is a cluster of cells. By itself it will do nothing. It is not alive. It is a component. If you are going to claim it is an organism then show me an article that says skin is an organism.Lol, when I tried to google ''organism skin'' the only thing I got was stuff about orgasms. This is proof that our world is seriously fucked up.But again to the skin thing. I do not have an article, sorry :)But the bottom layers of skin are not dead, they are living cells.Thank you. You just proved me right. I never asked if animal has a human brain. You just proved me correct.You said that you didn't even understand why I mentioned that only one specie has a human brain. Because you said ''almost all species on earth have brains'' that is why.I never said potential life is what the baby is. I said the child was a human. What are you even saying? Whatever, I can't keep updating you on the things you said yourself, makes this too complecating.Wow. Like you could scroll down to check the sources to see if they were telling the truth. Literally. Who takes the time to write fake stuff about Anencephaly?I don't know, I just pointed out that wikipedia is not a reliable source. I didn't say your article was fake.Caviar isn't alive and it doesn't grow once made. So making that statement is useless. Caviar is practically ...fish fetus. Or to say it differently, if we wouldn't have caught those fish eggs and eaten them, they would have turn out to be real fish.Oh okay. Even though as a fetus develops it is supposed to grow a brain. I see. I had no idea that a fetus can't develop a brain. How did you get a brain? It didn't just spawn there. You had to develop you brain as a fetus. A fetus will typically develop a brain.It is supposed to grow a brain yes, and typically it does, yes. But can you prove that a currently 5week pregnant lady's fetus IS going to develop a brain? No.
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: Yes

That is a claim. But not a claim that sperm is a potential life by itself.Potential life is only for the organism itself. Okay, do you remember how we got to debate about the potential thing?I'm a little bit confused by now :p I think we got ourselves into a dead end with this debate.You didn't know the difference between potential life and potential to create life.The top layer is like hair, not the two layers underneath.Okay? It still isn't an organism.Lol, when I tried to google ''organism skin'' the only thing I got was stuff about orgasms. This is proof that our world is seriously fucked up.It is okay. I had the same exact problem and accidentally clicked on a link thinking it said "organism".But again to the skin thing. I do not have an article, sorry :)But the bottom layers of skin are not dead, they are living cells.The cells are active yes. However a cell is not an organism. It is a component. You said that you didn't even understand why I mentioned that only one specie has a human brain. Because you said ''almost all species on earth have brains'' that is why.Yes. I didn't speak of "human brains". You brought that up with didn't parallel with what I said.Whatever, I can't keep updating you on the things you said yourself, makes this too complecating.Well thats because I never said the brainless baby was potential life. A fetus is. I baby is not. You just made that up.I don't know, I just pointed out that wikipedia is not a reliable source. I didn't say your article was fake.That is why I told you to go to wiki. They have plenty of sources.Caviar is practically ...fish fetus. Or to say it differently, if we wouldn't have caught those fish eggs and eaten them, they would have turn out to be real fish.Caviar is a product. It is made from salt-cured fish eggs. Caviar cannot grow. It isn't alive. It is supposed to grow a brain yes, and typically it does, yes. But can you prove that a currently 5week pregnant lady's fetus IS going to develop a brain? No.And that is what I am claiming. A fetus will typically develop a brain. Why argue with me on that?
Debate: Do you believe the embryo/fetus is a human being?
Side: No

Okay? It still isn't an organism.It is.The cells are active yes. However a cell is not an organism. It is a component. NoYes. I didn't speak of "human brains". You brought that up with didn't parallel with what I said.We were talking about human having brains and all of a sudden you say ''almost all animals have brains'' .. I didn't bring anything up.Well thats because I never said the brainless baby was potential life. A fetus is. I baby is not. You just made that up.I just made that up?? You just now made that up. I never said fetus isn't a potential life, actually I said it IS. And I never said a baby is or isn't a potential life. You keep bringing things up that has nothing to do with what we're talking about.That is why I told you to go to wiki. They have plenty of sources.And are those reliable?Caviar is a product. It is made from salt-cured fish eggs. Caviar cannot grow. It isn't alive. Haha, I'm not talking about caviar as a form of food. I'm talking about caviar before it has been caught. Fish eggs.And that is what I am claiming. A fetus will typically develop a brain. Why argue with me on that?So you won the debate? The fetus is human because it will typically develop a brain?