Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

And it harms children if they are brought into the equation.How does it harm them? By influencing them to believe that being gay isn't wrong? Right, that's pretty goddamn harming to the child.Unless you have proof that homosexual parents harm the growth of their adopted babies. Which you don't. And never will.Death will never be conquered... never.Evolution adapts can adapt anything to anything.Even death.Get over yourself.As I said... they can't address the common cold and what cancer has ever found a cure.We cannot cure the common cold because it's one the few viruses that evolves and adapts so quickly to medicine it's impossible to find a combination of drugs that kills the influenza virus without also killing the carrier. That's all.Also, we are getting very close to finding a cure for many forms of cancer. I read it in a paper a month ago.Besides, if we invent a computer so intelligent it's smarter then all of us on the planet combined, it can help us discover medicine that cures all disease, or better, a medicine that makes our immune system so powerful that we cannot be diseased and neither will our offspring.Please... they adopt and they hire women to have babies for them. Exactly, they adopt instead of using their own genetic material a lot of time.And when they DO use their genetic material, they have half as less children as normal couples.That's not an outrageous statement either.If a man or woman has x amount of children with a partner of the opposite sex, then two men or women would have 2x amount of children. Not a gay couple. Gay couple is two of one sex, and instead of having 2x amount of children, they have only x number of children.So either way, even if they use their genetic material, they are naturally combating overpopulation.Its the sex act that is ungodly. It has nothing to do with evolution.Really? Nothing to do with evolution? Then explain the thousands of animal species that have homosexuals among them.Also, apparently you don't know how evolution works.In evolution, when a creature has an undesirable trait, the trait vanishes from their gene pool because the trait does not allow them to more effectively survive.You could argue that homosexuality is not a product of evolution, except that it's a genetic trait found in many many species of animals, not just mammals.Homosexuality is a trait that has passed through the gene pool for millions of years. If it's found in a creature as lesser as a reptile, and then found in a creature as advanced as a cat or human, then it's been in the Earthly gene pool of all multicellular organisms for millions of years.Evolution doesn't let bad genes to circulate for long.Since homosexuality has existed for millions of years in the gene pools of so many animals... that means the trait actually helps animal species progress. Homosexuality helps all species that have the gene progress. Evolution lets them have the trait, so it's doing something that helps it's species. We don't know what yet, but it does. If it didn't, evolution wouldn't have allowed it to continue to circulate the gene pool.Your so concerned with the population.No, I'm so concerned with the living. Not the pre-living and dead.Do you think they should just kill all the elderly and poor and sick and handicapped...?We should if they want to choose to be euthanized, except for the mentally handicapped, since they are mentally incapable of choosing to have themselves euthanized. And even if any of these people want to be euthanized, it should only be allowed if they are in the worst amount of pain and/or suffering possible without them being unable to choose whether to live or die.