azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

1. Let me put it in a way you will understand, it doesn't matter where you are, if you smoke weed your going to get high and burn brain cells.2. How long are you going to talk about this like it fucking matters3. Yep4. I all ready told you, I've meet stoners and they have brains made of fucking Huba Baba gum.5. In your last comment you proved that you can't6. You people are a drag on society, this is why we need capitalism. Wastes of time like you will be sucking dick on the street. Bad choices should lead to a bad life, and people who make good choices shouldn't have to give the brain dead idiots money that they decide not to make theirself.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

1. You only burn brain cells if you smoke it way too much.2. It matters cuz it meanz u am wrong.3. Sorry. I don't know how.4. Most people are dumb asses to begin with, so its highly likely that you just saw some people who were born stupid.5. How so?6."You people"?. I'm not apart of that minority. And too bad for you, shit just doesn't work that way.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

1. Every stoner smokes enough to burn shit loads of brain cells2. Do you brag this much every time you nearly shit yourself, plus your grammar is horrible, go back to school3. Because you burn too many brain cells, dumbass4. I rarely see a mental retard with a joint in their hand5. Giving an anwser to a fake question that was clearly an insult6. Minorities, so only people who aren't white take welfare. That was racist as hell. There are a crap ton of white people out there that decided to do nothing with there lives. They flunked out of school and took tax payers money. People like you don't get a job, get your own money, and contribute to society and expect others to do it for you. You deserve all out hell you lazy, no good, racist, brain dead, pile of shit!
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

1. K...but you said "weed makes idiots". You didn't specify the amount required to make someone an idiot...2. Idk. I've never nearly shit myself.3. That didn't make sense.4. Cool beans.5. That just means it wasn't an insult .6. My name isn't Minorities. I didn't say only people who aren't white , dumb ass.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

You know what, I give up. A brain dead, racist, stoner, loser at life, good for nothin', plain out pile of shit like you is plain out impossible to debate with. Just trying communicate with you is hitting my head against a brick wall. Enjoy the waste of time you call your life.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

You know what, I give up. A brain dead, racist, stoner, loser at life, good for nothin', plain out pile of shit like you is plain out impossible to debate with. Just trying communicate with you is hitting my head against a brick wall. Enjoy the waste of time you call your life.Oh. That means I win. Giggity.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

That means you are impossible to talk to you failure of your parents
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

I agree. It is impossible to talk to my sister.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

You have a sister? Anyone who has to even know you I feel incredibly sorry for.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Pffft. I'm that guy people wished they knew.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

They guy they wish they knew. So your a fucking supplier?
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

I am many things.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

If you are any of the things I think you are you really need to kill yourself
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Opinion, noted. Opinion, discarded.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Scurpa dida Flurp.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

I cannot objectify this position due to it's inherent subjective identity, but I would say that music today is still as good as it was years ago. It all depends on the listener and their individual interests.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

First of all this is a very open question considering there is a LOT of music out there.I listen to some music of today that doesn't get aired on the radio or tv or anything and I just think how popular it might be if the same thing came out in the 60's. Here's the thing.. There is a lot more music now then there was. There will never be another Beatles because we live in a world where everyone is listening to different things. If a band started right now and they were as good as the Beatles do you think they'd get big? Or be on the radio? Or win awards? The reason so many people argue for Na on the other side is that they compare say the Beatles or led zepplin to say.. the Jonas Brothers or taylor swift. That's not a proper comparison. There are a lot of rock bands who make a lot of music that is very good. That kind of sound doesn't get a lot of media attention. Simple as that. People don't look for good music and don't know it's there. A genre of music can only be dead to people who rely on the norm of society.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Personally, I think it is. However, this is from a male teenager's point of view. So for some one who actually lived through and got to expirience some of the great musicians, such as Janice Joplin, Elvis Presley, Bob Marley, Jonny Cash, etc., they might think that music today isn't as real or as powerful as some of the music they listened to as kids.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

I think so. I like Trance music and this form of music was not available until the end of the 20th century.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

hahaha is that even a question? Nope.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

I like you, you go strait to the point and don't waste a second.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Because I read the question wrong, I got the yes and no mixed up :PI almost hated you for a minute Srom ;)
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

I suppose you are trying to say that older music is better than newer music. This is an opinion, but my opinion would be older music is better for the same reason as the author said it was: Older music lasts longer. I know songs that a lot of people liked for about a week and got tired of it nowadays. Mozart, Bach, Beethoven. All famous composers in the Baroque or Classical period of music. We know their names today as being those fancy people with violins. Classical music has really changed our lives today. The orchestra, an old ensemble of people who play instruments, is still around today. The saxophone, one of the newer instruments, was the instrument of jazz music. The jazz era is gone now, but we still love and enjoy its music. We still compose music of classical descent all the way up to jazz music. Newer music is easily forgotten and since music is so common these days, we forget songs more easily. Music wasn't as common in the classical music period; perhaps people made a big deal out of every single music composition ever made in that era: because it was harder to come by.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

the music played in the past was much much better than today .. but there are some songs you cannot compare
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

They say the brain is the most complex and amazing biological matter, well, when it comes to 'music' nowadays..Obviously not.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

This isn't a good question. There are today, as in any other given time, several qualities of music; good, bad, mediocre, catchy, popular, blah blah blah... If you're asking of what's popular, then you have to understand the generation/culture that the music comes from. Now consider how each individual views music a different way. I'm a cynical musician, so when I hear today's pop music I have to fight off stabbing myself in the temple with whatever is within reach of my hand. This isn't true for everyone.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

I agree this is the case, but as I was brought up with classical music mainly, I have to say that my ears don't agree with the harsh qualities of rap 'music'.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Ever hear Billy Joel, MJ, Elvis, Bon Jovi, or Werid Al? They had amazing music. Today we have this Lil' Wane crap and meaning less songs that are super popular than one day just completely forgotten. At least Werid Al and Goerge Strait are still alive.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

All opinions, and out of your list of alleged good oldies, I only enjoyed one song by one artist. That's weird Al's trapped in the drive through.I like Lil Wayne, he puts clever one liners, puns, and metaphors into his songs in a way that not many others have.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Lil' Wane clever. He's a stoner with a mic. He says the stupidest crap all the time. All these new songs are guilty pleasure, addictive, meaningless crap. Well, that's what I think. Adding music to debate is a crazy idea that will lead to armageddon. I'm from a small town up in Colorado. I like old music and country no matter what time it was from. Your most likely from a bigger town and like rap, hip hop, and pop. We have different views on life and different likes.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

You said you like country!?This is going no where fast.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

At least the old songs had some meaningful message to convey, or a simple story.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Do you like Run D.M.C. and Public Enemy more or less than Lil Wayne? Wouldn't those be more comparable?
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Who's that? Run D.M.C, Public Enemy, if its anything like Lil' Wane I'm glad I never heard of it.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Older hip hop artists. Closer to the genre/style of Lil Wayne I think.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

I didn't like run DMC but I did like Public Enemy. I listen to little wayne more than though because it's easier to find. Also he makes me laugh with a lot of the things he says. Just like how a person could be creative enough to come up with some of the ridiculous stuff he says.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

It gets it from crap tons of weed. I bet if you asked him how he comes up with his music he'd say "the magical unicorn came up with it, hehehe".
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

This comment shows that you follow the media and the public news religiously and know absolutely nothing about the real person that is lil wayne. He has a higher education (though he'd never admit it in his music) than most of the politicians you know of.He smokes weed I guess, but that's like how Bob Marley smokes weed, or how anyone drinks alcohol. It's something they do, but it in no way defines them.This has gone beyond a simple matter of opinion vs opinion. This is bigoted bandwagon dick rider who knows very little about the artists they dislike vs a person who's trying their very best to be unbiased and polite.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Oh yea, fuck me. I'm a dick head pile of shit they needs to die in a hole because I have a fucking opinion. If I don't like Lil' Wane than I'm motherfucking Hitler. Because its such a god damn crime to grow up in a small town and not like rap and hip hop. I should have a damn rope around my neck and attach it to my fucking celling fan because I don't think exactly like you. Fuck me.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Da

Well if that's how you feel...
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

About your songs being popular for one day and then being forgotten- I totally agree. Whereas many songs from the past are still played, I don't see many of these being played in a few months, let alone years.Edited- I saw my mistake xD
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

Gaaaaad!I always thought everyone would like the 1D FOREVER. Now, I just don't even. Know.
Debate: Is music today as good as it has been in the past?
Side: Nai

From a personal standpoint I prefer older music. I like all genres of music from pop, country, rap, rock, even polka. Yes I like polka even. But I can't connect to the newer songs as much as I can the old ones. Besides a sick beat, great rhythm, and meaningful lyrics I like a story in my songs. I like to be able to close my eyes and imagine exactly what this person felt like when they were writing this song. I want to be able to feel every emotion they intended to put in their song. I have only found a few songs from today that do that for me. As for older songs, I can relate to them. They have great stories, keep my mind off things, and make me "feel". What else could you ask for in a song?
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

i thinnk twilight is better but that just my choice.the books and the movies are soooo good.cant wait for next movie:)
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Twilight in the world is the best thing that ever happend to all of us.If this was real,we would know how to spot them out,and i said IF.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

"Twilight in the world is the best thing that ever happened to all of us." -Okay. Well then. WHAT THE HECK DOES THAT MEAN? I'm going to assume you meant to say "Twilight is the best thing to ever happen to the world".First off - WHY? You give absolutly NO explanation as to WHY Twilight is so amazing. Why not explaning your statement a little bit more than this?It makes no sense!Not to mention, Twilight is probably one of the worst things to happen to girls in our generation, since it promotes abusive relationships to an extreme.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Harry Potter for sure. With one flick of his wrist he could lay out Edward and his posse.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Well how come edward wouldn't read his mind.How come they are so fast you don't know whats goning to happen.Maybe edward would read his mind and dodge out of the way.How do you know,tell me.Huh??
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Really? With all the spells, potions, hexes, charms, jinxes, etc. that Harry knows it's easy. PLUS edward has to be at close range to do anything. Oh and about the mind reading all Harry has to do is think false strategies and wait for edward to fall for it. Sorry Twihard but you lose this one.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

As much as I hate to get involved in so asinine a debate, is it not true that, within canon, of course, Edward Cullen is a telepath? If this were so, he would know each and every one of Harry Potter's "spells, potions, hexes, charms, jinxes, etc."
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Telepath meaning he can read his mind, but as I said earlier you don't have to think about something before you do it and Harry can actually trick Edward into thinking he's going to do something and it's really a trap. But let's just say Edward heard in Harry's thoughs that he is going to try to trick him, Edward would then try to figure out which thoughs are traps and which Harry actually plans on attempting.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Telepath meaning he can read his mind, but as I said earlier you don't have to think about something before you do it and Harry can actually trick Edward into thinking he's going to do something and it's really a trap. But let's just say Edward heard in Harry's thoughs that he is going to try to trick him, Edward would then try to figure out which thoughs are traps and which Harry actually plans on attempting.A telepath would know everything in the other person's mind. He would know every lie Harry tells.Plus, as is obvious during the second movie (Edward's astral projections), he too has knowledge of the "dark arts".
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Actually it is said that he can only hear the current thoughts the person is thinking and his ability works best when either A: he knows the person or B: he's fighting another vampire so i'm sure he can't rely on that.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Also alice could see the future.He wouldn't know that huh would he.Well if he would change his mind alice would still see it.Like when james figured it out alice saw it and where he was going.How bout that smart-ally.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

well Venufan,what if harry dosen't know that Edward is a vampire.I think you lost that one.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Well if you haven't noticed vampires are very pale and his quick movements give it away what else could it be?P.S. The fangs would also be a DEAD giveaway. :D
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

That was quite possibly some of the stupidest debating I have ever seen.Though it was sloppy, you are the victor.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Well I can do better if it's something real, and worth arguing about. Plus this person was spelling words wrong and they don't really make sense. Not worth getting all worked up on someone who is probably around 9 or 10.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Oh shutup i'm 11.My mom was telling me why i shouldn't get a cell.So i wrote this up and she said that i make a good debate and she bought me one.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

So you were making spelling errors and grammatical errors just to appease your opponent? Oh now I get it.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

No, I meant I am not as concerned about this since the subject matter is fictional. If it were real and affected me then I would give better arguments. This particular debate is not easy because neither of us know everything our subjects are capable of just what the author writes about them which is not a full bio. I don't know every spell harry knows and to be honest anything could happen. Someone could trip or get blinded for a second and it's all over.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Fine then.Tell me about the villans then.The villans are much more better in twilght because they don't have to touch the scar on harrys forehead to make him squeal.The vutori actually torture them.Ok were talking about the real subject ok.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Twilight is only a fad, the fan base has a majority of females. Tell me are you a fan of "chick flicks"?The Harry Potter books killed the Twilight books in every aspect, just due to the graphicness of Twilight you assume it is a better movie/book? That is nonsense.The Harry Potter movies/books are for all age groups, whereas Twilight is mainly for teens and young adults. However Harry Potter in its entire entity is a better work.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

In Harry Potter the villains kill the closest thing Harry has to a father figure twice. Dumbledore and Sirius Black. Then in the process of killing dumbledore they almost killed Ron. They also burned ron's house down killed Harry's real parents and have near killed him countless times.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Yea but Voldemort didn't kill dumbledore.You are mixed up.The Deatheaters killed both.Voldemort did nothing but watch his minons kill both.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Doesn't matter a villains is described as someone who is against the protagonist or good guy. Voldemort and his flunkies are all villains.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

yeah thats right draco(pyhso)malfoy,crab and goyle are real keepers.Good luck really.His whole family are the deatheaters and there not villans.the're all psyco-paths.Talk about villanis people.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Draco and his buddies are wimps to say the least but they cause negative difficulties and oppose the good guy so they are villains they may not be good one's but that's beside the point. What about bellatrix lestrange who killed sirius black who happens to be her younger brother and one of Harry's father figures? How about Snape who murdered Dumbledore Harry's other great influence?
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Bellatrix is still pysco.She is a phsco-path witch.Still means she kills but bellatrix was probably high or ssomething everyday.Look at her she looks like a gremline,dirty and disguisieing her real clean self.She think shes bad cuz shes high.Bloody-hell knows what.And if snape kills dumbledore he knew it was coming so why not.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Yeah but wizards don't know vampires are real and their fangs only come out when they smell good blood.Also harry potter is pale too.Edward could possibly be careful around him not to move fast OR any vampire things just like other humans.P.S. How can you make this up listen to what they say and watch there movements on twilight to really know how they stay seceret from humans.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Harry lives in a world of faires, trolls, dragons, etc. I'm sure he has heard about vampires in a book or something.P.S. Wizards can hide themselves better than vampires because in the movie Hogwarts looks like an old rundown building. Now that's power.P.S.S. Harry is not always pale like vampires are.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Twilight

Fat chance,vampires look like regular people.No one would look in there eyes unless there red and thats very noticable.How come you have very little sense.The only ways to know theres a vampire on the premices is to read about or look it up and try to find someone that fits in with all that stuff.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

I like both. But I have to say Harry Potter is a lot better. Twilight is all about romance, but Harry Potter is more exciting. Harry Potter is better.
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

The plot is better in Harry Potter and has much better character development than I have seen in Twilight. I am basing my opinions here on the books, but even with the movies, Harry Potter just seems more developed and intellectual, like there is actual mystery and palatable emotions that you receive from the actors. There are also stronger female characters in Harry Potter compared to Twilight; Bella just seems way too apathetic and so weak as a lead character in the first place aka the feminist's worst nightmare. And yes, read all of the books for each sides to make this statement more plausible. lol
Debate: Twilight vs Harry Potter
Side: Harry Potter

Twilight is like Underworld, except not sexy (no Kate Beckinsale), Not cool (No Viktor), not entertaining in any way (No meaningful violence) and completely lacking in all other redeeming qualities. Whereas Underworld gave us a violent, bloody war between vampires and werewolves, Twilight gives us teenage angst, Poor acting, Bad (absent?) plot, and some paranormal activity thrown in, in a vain attempt to separate itself from conventional teen movies. God, it's awful.Harry Potter, while low in my regard, is at least above this.