Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Most people wouldn't. It doesn't actually prove anything, nor does it provoke thought, therefore no progress has been made.I am not most people. I am smarter than the average bear. I have been waiting for an answer like that from you. If you ever answered a question even with an insult I could continue the conversation.It's not your place to say she was wrong, nor is it your place to say that I should have ignored her.That statement makes no sense. If it isn't my place to tell her she is wrong, then it isn't your place to tell me I am wrong for pointing out she is wrong. Therefore, I was ok to tell her she was wrong.It's not your place to imply that she shouldn't have made that comment.She shouldn't have made the comment since she misuses fallacies all the time.By accusing her of being both in the wrong and derailing the conversation,Since she was wrong, and you got derailed there is nothing wrong with me pointing that out.you are implying that she should not have spoke up for what she believes.She stated something as a fact that was not a fact. It wasn't her belief.Yes, you said she was wrong and therefore in the wrong. Don't try any word games, don't try to be pedantic be with me.You sound very controlling here.You responded to LibProlifers comment, you made a comment to her and about her. Entirely.Yes. I said that.She merely spoke up for herself.So, because she spoke up fer herself you can twist it to whatever you feel like?Something else entirely other than Prolifers comment? I guess that includes the debate at hand.Yes. So you derailed the argument.I don't recall adding anything to Prolifers statement if that is what you are implying. Key word, implying. I don't imply things like you do.Do you not understand what I mean by you responding to something else entirely? How can you respond to something else entirely if you actually responded to what she said?And I have every right to comment in response to your comments.Again, I am not trying to stop you. Keep responding. But, if you derail the conversation by responding you are responsible for derailing the conversation.I'll decide that.Wow. Stubborn to the very end I guess.And show respect for HER, she's a female.Oh, so your are sexist. Nice. You feel that women are weaker I take it.Another excuse and another guilt trip. Rationalization, yet again.Another example of you claiming to know something you don't actually know. Looks like you really listened to that advice.Gonna give me any advice on how to do all of this?Pretend that the people you are talking to aren't trying to lay down a guilt trip.I know what an insult is. Insinuations and all that. Key word, imply.JUST an insult. I know it was insulting. I didn't say it wasn't an insult.Rationalisations and excuses for saying things. I don't listen to that talk.Of course you don't listen. I have already pointed that out.You're clearly not a gentleman.I am a gentleman when it is warranted. Was your point earlier that I wasn't a gentleman?IQ tests do a reasonable job at testing verbal communication.Nope. Everything tested is written down.IQ tests are to do with handling information? In other words that is to do with how well our brains connect together.What do you think it tests?IQ tests should be focused more on the core of testing our brain connections, rather than measuring how quick someone is verbally.Which connections?