azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Are you kidding me?1) Liberally biased polls? Let's take a look here...http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/ latest polls/presgeneral/Literally every single poll on there with the exception of USC Tracking has Clinton with a wide lead. And USC Tracking notes very clearly that their polls use a different algorithm than the others, e.g bases things on which party's candidates the respondents voted for in previous elections, which is a mistake in an election where people are ditching party affiliation in droves.2) The size of rallies is irrelevant to a candidate's success. Clinton is among many leaders in the past and present who is simply not trying to maximize rally attendance, instead relying on micro-management and organization. Recent examples of people who won elections despite low rally turnout - Justin Trudeau of Canada, Barack Obama (2012), George W. Bush (2004).The best predictor of a candidate's success in history has been, sorry, polling. It has evolved over time for that very purpose.3) What we know about Clinton is that her supporters are everyone else.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

Sorry but if history had any power in this debste:1)Trump would not be here anymore2)The liberal media would be semi honest as it once was as opposed to one lie after another to manipulate a false narrative.Hillary does not have support of "everyone else". Trump leads with independents even in liberal bias polls. Some things are just too big to spin.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

Trump is a clear victor in every anonymous poll I have seen. Why does it matter you ask? Well...we have a new phenomenon this time. Liberal Nazis have used a smear campaign to label anyone who openly supports Trump as homophobic, sexist, racist, thus his people are shamed into only declaring allegiance to him anonymously. Thus? The anonymous polls tell the story. ABC, CNN, etc polls are? One lie spun upon another lied, heaped upon even more lies.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

Aaaaaah...good old Barack Obama and the polls. The same polls that had him losing to Hillary? lmao
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Real clear politics showed Obama surpassing Hillary early in 2008.ref
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Instead we should believe the folks who thought Romney was going to win handily, right??
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Clinton, and I already elaborated on FromWithin's debate of what he would be saying if he had been the debater in the 2nd debate.But what you keep seeing demonstrated on this site is the Trump supporters absolutely refuse to acknowledge any scenario where he is behind or loses, and in that respect they're no different than the RNC website which declared Pence the winner even before the VP debate had started.Trump went on the attack, appeasing his core supporters. But he bungled answering any questions on the topics asked, shared no plans or policies of his own, looked absolutely uncomfortable much of the time, and had insufficient answers to his sexist and other comments. His core supporters are not nearly enough votes to elect him, and he made no progress on gaining more. And fact checkers (see other debate I referenced) have already given almost all the confirmed truth to Clinton for that debate.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

The same fact checker who interrupted Trump to fact check him letting him know that stop and frisk was "unconstitutional? Snopes, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC? All liberal diehards who will spin so called "fact checks" to direct a liberal narrative. If you are getting your news from mainstream media you probably do not know the Russians put up anti air defense in Syria to attack the U.S. and that wikileaks proved the media is bought off.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Conservatives label everything that isn't conservative as instead liberal and biased. I'll ask you what I've asked previously on this site. Can you give me a list of 10 publications I can get my news from which are neither liberal leaning nor conservative leaning? Seriously. Who is fair? Tell me.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

No one. So quit drinking the koolaid and find out for yourself. You want to know about the email scandal? Actually watch or listen to the testimonies. It'll make your skin crawl. You want to know what "lewd comments" Trump made 12 years ago? Actually listen to the audio. You want to know about Obama's worldview? Read his books. I did. Scary stuff.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

And I often do. In fact I'm usually the person on this site who picks political poll claims apart after reading the actual poll data. Yet that doesn't mean that not a single scrap of credible published news is out there. Nor does it help when you're essentially saying anything people quote on a debate website for documentation is automatically all trash.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

The American media is a government puppet propaganda machine. Go check out foreign mews. You'll then begin to notice this magical phenomenon calleda blackout. I watched news on the Syrian conflict for years. Never saw it covered on American tv. We weren't supposed to know. The internet has made it hard for them to hold onto their mind monopoly, but still yet, if enough become informed? They'll shut the internet or be toppled depending on who moves first.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

I do read foreign news sources, too, including BBC and the Australian. Their takes are not dramatically different from the mainstream US publications you're slamming.Look, I'm not even denying media bias exists. Take all information with a grain of salt. But it's ludicrous to summarily reject any and all published information. And it's silly when some boost opaquely conservative propaganda sites as the only real truth and then cr@p on old standards like the NYT and WSJ.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

http://youtu.be/xpG4Z5D6B4w
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Very hard, in my opinion you will fail on both candidates. Not many leaders now or ever have the best interest for the people. Fear drives democracy.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Trump Won

One wants globalism and open borders per wikileaks.The other wants closed borders and nationalism.One is dangerous to us. One protects us. This is an easy choice.
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

Exactly, hence why Hillary will win :P
Debate: Trump Vs Clinton Debate 2 - Who Won?
Side: Clinton Won

America will be exactly the same whoever wins. The American people won't decide who will win, that part is already done by the Banks, Pharmaceutical companies and the NRA. Your screwed like the rest of the world.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

TELEVISION are more important because it can make people relax and entertain if he is tired. It also gives info and it is more specific than books. If we are using books we should read it twice, thrice in able to keep it in our mind, but in tv, even the report will appear once, people understand and enjoy.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

1. Books can make you relax equally as much as TV, and according to some studies, more. Additionally, if you are watching TV to relax before bed, there are concerns about blue light from the screen disturbing your Melanin production, making you unable to sleep as well as you would if not for your blue light causing screen.2. Generally, books tend to give more information than tv because books can tell the reader something from inside a characters mind, and really go in depth, while TV is more surface level.3. While people might think they enjoy TV more, you are unable to achieve the same level of deep thought from TV as from reading, which makes it a rather unfulfilling experience.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Happy wheels is the perfect option if you are seeking for mini-games to relax or games that are both enjoyable and provide skill development for your youngster. You can find a variety of games that meet your demands on this website.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Yes may be you're right but playing games like dragon city mod apk is still better than watching T.V https://dragoncitymodapk.online/
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Ignore this. I meant to post to dispute, not clarify. Oops.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

The Samsung A Series 2023 provides a number of different options, so it can cater to the requirements of a wide range of users. From entry-level models to high-end flagships, Samsung ensures that there is a phone suitable for every budget and need. If you are in the market for a new phone, you should give serious consideration to this series because it offers attractive rates and solid specifications. The Samsung A Series 2023 has a variety of configurations available to choose from, so it can accommodate a user's preferences in terms of the phone's camera resolution, battery life, and gaming capabilities, among other things. I really hope that this post helps you choose a cellphone that is suitable for your requirements. https://www.teknopediia.eu.org/
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

People who are against tv keep on saying that it causes obesity. I'm not going to go for a run and bring a book to read on the way. I think it is much easier to exercise watching tv then reading a book. In gyms people do not have books infront of them, instead they have telvisions. Studies have shown that telivision is even more stimulating than books.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

It is good to read blogs of healthy supplies than watch TV https://healthysupplies.online/
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Last Fortress Underground MOD APK opens the floodgates to a limitless cache of resources at your disposal. No more tedious waiting for resources to replenish – now, you can construct and fortify your stronghold at your own pace. https://modapksworld.com/
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Cheating may provide short-term gains, but its impact is far more significant on what should be a gratifying gaming experience. Understanding the importance of fair play allows us to collectively create an environment that is both fair and enjoyable. Ngobrol Games
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I think TV is better if you are watching an informational channel and it is better than books because you can switch to different informational channels an search documentaries on different subjects and when you are done learning and ready to relax you can switch to a funny show or what ever you want to watch.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

You can reach the same wealth of knowledge through books, and in fact usually get a better sense of the topic when researching it yourself. You can switch to different books, and search for ebooks. When you are done learning and are ready to relax, you can switch to a different genre of book. I fail to se how your arguments pertain solely to TV, and how they give any argument for why TV is better, because books have the same properties that you described.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

I think that TV is good because it is faster and some people cant read
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

it is fasterwhos in a hurry???some people cant readso then the govt wont concentrate on education because the tv will seem as if to teach everything. and those who can't read are usually poor so they won't even be able to afford a tv.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Have you ever read Fahrenheit 451? The comments on this pro-Television side remind me of it.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Books are better than TV because you ca never get board with a book!!!! Also books can't have any reruns like TV does. Yeah you can get important information from TV, but there is a thing called a NEWSPAPER!!!!!!! NEWSPAPERS HAVE THE SAME THING AS TV Books can also make you smarter. Books improve your grammar, spelling, and your brain!!!!SO KEEP READING!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

I support you and I can agree big time with you and I will start making better choices about T.V.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

so you would be dumb enough to not read.students who know nothing can just get taught by teachers
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

can people say some points on TV is better than books because at our school were doing a debate can you please help!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

tv because only tv can bring u live news at books u can't find also it's educational
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

tv can bring u live news at books u can't findthere is something called the newspaper. this whole debate is mostly concentrating on people reading and not watching tv. also it's educationali believe you have text BOOKS at school. which again calls reading a good thing. on television you will only look for channels that satisfy your interests... you wouldn't watch the news but you would watch the cartoons and even repeat episodes. but in books, you can pick out any book and read it till you finish it. and it will always be the better option.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

GO TV!!!!!! GO TV!!!!TV will win hopefully LOLTV is great to watch anything
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Is there an actual point here, or are you simply inanely supporting your point without doing any research?
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

nowadayz no one can liv wdout t.v... its common to watch t.v to all... so......... t.v ix beter than bookxx.... evrybdy vot for t.v....
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

cuz it is !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

In my opinion,TV is better than books for several reasons. First of them, TV shows you a whole picture with all the details when books give you uncertainty,TV saves you a time for getting known something, when during the reading you need to read ,to replay the situation in your mind for understanding it clearly.Secondly, TV can be shared with 3 or 5 people the same time. Also compared to reading the books when your hands are busy,during watching a TV show you can do something else. Television has a certain quantity of programmes and a book has only one story. There is a big progress in technology when we have a lot of learning programmes on TV.Also the new option for TV is that you can choose the language of speaker,thus TV can help you to practise languages you learn. To sum up I want to say,that today's technology is working for us,it helps to save time,money and avoid unnessesary efforts.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is better because you can just explore the world while sitting on a couch
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

U KANT WATCH HARLEM SHAKE ON BOOKZ!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is WAY better than reading books from the blimem OLDEN DAYS!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

I'm not sayin this cuz I love the tube, but you get more imformation than you think in the tube.EX) News, Baseball, Spongebob, etc.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

you can just sit on the couch with some crisps or a burger or sweets and watch tv when you cant be botherd to to anything else
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

tv is better than books because you learn easier by seeing not read
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

If you can only understand or speak a specific language but you move to another country then most of the books are not in your language but TV comes in all different languages and you can also hear how the words are pronounced in a different language.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

you can get the “Foxtel Go” app on your Ipad so you can watch TV where ever and whenever you want.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Without TV actors/actresses wouldn’t have jobs. Without TV you wouldn’t know what’s happening around the world. I mean the newspapers can’t fit all that in. Books and newspapers can’t give you emergency warnings or updates or new flashes
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

tv is far superior due to its wider variety of thing to do and some people say that tv is incontinent but now you can watch tv on a smart phone witch is very convenient
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

I love TV sooooooo much I can watch what ever i want and it is just the best.with TV you can watch DVDs and play on playstations.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

I can watch what ever i wantyou can also read whatever you want in books.play on playstations.that is one reason that so many people are turning obese. playing virtually and not physically.with TV you can watch DVDs with books you can form a mental image of whatever you read. you put in your on characters and imagine them just like you want them to be.also in many movies directors cut shots that may be vital or good. this also is a disadvantage in tv. in a book you read whatever the author has written and don't skip many parts of it.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

play on playstations.that is one reason that so many people are turning obese. playing virtually and not physically.Some video game systems like Wii can play physicaly
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Reading books for a long time can make anyone just as obese, and maybe even more. At least pressing buttons takes more energy than flipping pages.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

The modernization of the living conditions of astronauts in zero gravity is not an easy task, Astronauts' Health Takes a Giant Leap with the Help of Northumbria University Experts. Interesting discoveries await us when opening new space stations in orbit. Perhaps they will give more opportunities for a long stay on board with the preservation of the healthy lifestyle of astronauts.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: tv

You can watch TV in one sitting where as a book takes all day to read. So no physical exercise will get done reading books. Exercise shows on TV make you move. SO TV IS WAY BETTER THEN BOOKS!!!!!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

Not necessarily. You might be able to exercise with television and electronics, but think about where your brain is going. Did you know that television and other gaming systems are the main cause of ADD and ADHD? Other people, like a friend of mine with epilepsy, cannot do watch television or play games. He is a bodybuilder and writes books. He is well informed in Elizabethan literature and other works from the earlier centuries of time. So it boils down to how you spend your time, and how you live your life. You may get muscles while exercising during a TV episode of Spongebob, but you also probably lost ten points of your IQ. You can choose to be entertained and be healthy physically, or you can choose to be entertained, be healthy physically, AND make yourself smarter.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

Ok, so TV is a bit unhealthy. Lets stop riding cars, we're not walking enough! It pollutes the environment anyways. Lets not have chairs, standing up is exercise. Also every single junk food has unhealthy chemicals. And just talk about all those skincare products, smearing deadly toxins over us everyday! If you think TV is bad, why not all these and many more?
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is better than books because the educational programs on TV are much more convenient and easy to understand. It is also easy to use for people who cannot see or hear. Books are also likely to be not updated with latest information about a certain topic while information from TV can be much more accurate and useful.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV is so much totally so much tottaly so much tottally better than books because5 reasons:1. TV is bright and exiting, Books are dull and boring2. You can get paper cuts reading books3. Books are made out paper and to make paper, you cut down trees. So, Books destroy the environment.4. You can relax while watching TV. Unlike novels where you need to hold the book which is not as relaxing as watching TV5. If you drive and read at the same time, you can cause accidents or crash.If you think TV is better than books, you are a super hero in the Matty LeagueIf you think Books are better than TV, Chuck Norris will kill youBye
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

you are wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

i disagree. books are better as they usually contain good content. plus if you watch something while driving, you can also crash too. also, TV's con destroy your eyes if you look to close. does TV's give you education? Well, no. they do not because it always depends on what you are watching. also, all movies always has a story line, and guess, what. they usually don' t type it. they always has a physical version of it. all of this is on everyone's option. you can't for someone. you also cannot say " If you think Books are better than TV, Chuck Norris will kill you". this is technically cyber bullying.See ya and thanks!siatma, peace out.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

i mean can all the following stuff is for the 50 char length:v v v v v v v v v v v v v b f f bg g d fv fg f tg dt g fgb fhh fgdf c df df h bs as cdb fygvfd hfxvc d fngh gbvxc bf gcjgnbfhg vbn jtnhfbgdcv fgd fv cr gfvt vcsxz AXEJIP'[]P ''.,MNFVCXSADX hg hnjk jn gfgv
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TELEVISION are more important because it can make people relax and entertain if he is tired. It also gives info and it is more specific than books. If we are using books we should read it twice, thrice in able to keep it in our mind, but in tv, even the report will appear once, people understand and enjoy.769 days ago | Side: tvSupport | Dispute | Clarify brydierose19(3) 6 pointsPeople who are against tv keep on saying that it causes obesity.I'm not going to go for a run and bring a book to read on the way. I think it is much easier to exercise watching tv then reading a book.In gyms people do not have books infront of them, instead they have telvisions.Studies have shown that telivision is even more stimulating than books.
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: TV

TV ,,!! because you can get information from different resources in a short time ,,, but Books you must read a lot to get that much of information !!
Debate: TV is better than Books
Side: Books

What experiments with Payloads of microsathelites have become a successful indicator for the use of an innovative approach in the implementation of monitoring programs, low earth orbit satellite technology? The characteristics of the traffic for ground stations can change speed with the necessary quick queries.