Debate: Satanism vs Christianity
Side: Christianity

as I said a non computer generated picture .....and were is the fourth wall ...and were are the thousands of satalightes...also ive seen the same space station on Sandra bullock movies ......this is a joke to emphasize you did not follow the NON CGI photo ....and as for tectonic plate theory where was it proven and by what process you people need to learn the difference between saying something and actually knowing it ...I can offer proofs as I know the computer program used to generate the photo you used as proof that only proved as I was saying these pictures are all CGI....you did not do very deep investigation so you failed there....so you say mt Everest came from the ocean floor ....how in science to be fact it must be replicated ....you see a lot of ten mile transitions do ya .....all these people have done as I have confronted them in several universities is add time and distance to account for lack luster results......in the 60s it was millions of years then people crunched the numbers and seen that to scale the math was wrong ...then they said hundreds of millions ....we did the math and scale was off now they say billions and as I have proven in many debates all nature replicates on constant numeric sequences ....and this being the foundation of the many modern theories has proven that at scale billions of years is so fucking absurd .....for one lets say that is true what proof do they have ...a test performed in secret by them to prove a theory that keeps them employed and the GOD they hate out of the lime light ....set amount of elements when is the last time you read the revised table ...you must not work in the field ...I can tell by other basic foolish thing but this is the clincher ...we have added quite a few things to the table since 1984 ...some you will never be privy to like compounds 147 to compounds 151 you will never ever see those in your life neither will your kids this tech is government clearance level 18 sooooo good luck chuck...as for a intact set of bones ...I have dr friend who has quite a few ever seen the ice man or the wooly mammoth full sets of less than million year bones it seems as you add bullshit time and distance your story literally falls apart ..85 % set of bones makes a full color life size representation ...that statement on its own make my case for forged evidence ....as we have a 2% genetic difference than primates you can see where 15% is just fucking laughable...ive met and studied along side these retards trust me there degrees are worthless but as long as they can forge data to receive handouts that match government narative ......and you name one dig that a million year plus set of bones with soft tissue connected and ill prove you found a dead dog....potassium argon you say....this is fancy terms for gas dating ....this data starts with a notion that gases behave and build up and release one certain way .....ever seen Yellowstone...if you have then youknow gasses can release at random ...they rely on people like you who only say something and not know anything to spout off things like a puppet that aren't true....so far you did not meet non CGI clause you stated a non replicated even to scale theory....you clamed the elemental table was complete ...its not .....we add to it all the time your just not on the call list .....you admitted 15% margin of error in a field were 2% creates new species ....you used gas as your bases for time stamping the entire earth .....a man pressurized gas test with a outcome being the bases of test not truth ....if you like I can come to your house with 10 dollars worth of equipment and we can recreate a million year old piece of dog shit ....using your pattasium argon gas.....and I think considering I know a archeologist who applied for said dive permit and was denied and told by locals why...... your the guy who tells local tribes men in the African swamp that makela umbeba is not real ....even though they are telling you last week there kid was eaten by it .....you have essentially done nothing but prove my case and how shallow your work is you relied on others to do your work ....these people have never done well in debates and you think your smart for using there flawed work on here well im not these laymen sir ...I can debunk everything you just said if you would like I can compile test data and present it ....keep in mind you met none of the criteria ....I have personally in labs proven everything your going to say wrong and so have many others if a scientific method is propped up on bogus data you should not use it this stuff is fed to you people because your small enough and lazy enough to buy into it ....