Debate: Does God exist?
Side: yes

Note that I said "something of faith." If you have evidence of something, you need no faith to accept that something. If you believe in something by faith, then you have no evidence of it.Except that it was not what you said. You said that if you believe something by faith, then evidence does not exist.Robber's Cave ExperimentThey were twelve years old. They were already prejudiced prior to the experiment. That proves nothing. Childrens in kindengarden are not prejudiced.Looks like you didn't address what I said.You didn't have an argument. Only bare assertions and name calling. Nothing to address. I don't have to address every nonsense you can came up with in your head, specially since they are not backed up by evidence.It's hard to avoid name calling when people say really dumb things.I know. I am having a hard time addressing your "arguments" in a civil manner. Your poor grasp of Logic is the worst part since I have to demonstrate it to be wrong, instead of simply dismissing your bare assertions as being mere bare assertions.The Odyssey happened in Turkey, and we know that Troy existed, so I object to calling it a mythology.Fair enough. Provide me archeological evidence for the history of the Odyssey and we stop.Incorrect, it is deductive reasoning (a priori cannot be inductive).I stand corrected, it is deductive reasoning. However, it matters nothing. It is still not a categorical syllogism. Not every deductive reasoning is a categorical syllogism.I'm still correct in my assessment, the minor premise is subjective, an assertion.There is no minor premise. It is not a syllogism.Object defined to exist does not follow into it existing.It does if you can prove that it possibly necessarily does.Seeing as that was the first time I encountered that argument written that way, and I countered it successfully,You only countered it successfully inside your own head. Strawman doesn't count as counterargument.looks like I'm smarter than you and the maker of that argument. You are free to think so. Your arguments show otherwise.because it doesn't depend on smartness anyway, but reasoning skillsPoor you, then.Complex things don't require design, necessarily.And you claim such because..? Wait, I know that one. Because evolution is true and it can create complex beings without the need of a designer. Ah, ok. Circular reasoning.And a tautology from a loaded word like design/designer.You don't seem to know what the word tautology means. If it is a tautology, you shouldn't even be disputing it.You misread it. When the premise and conclusion are the same, it is a tautology.I didn't misread anything. When the premise and conclusion are the same, the premise is not justifying the conclusion. The premise is the conclusion. And when the premise and conclusion are the same, it is not a tautology (you really do not know what it means, it seems). It is circular reasoning. I believe you meant to say 'a tautological argument' instead of 'a tautology,' which would be correct, then. Yet, your use of the word justify is completely incorrect. Are you a native American speaker?You assume gravity is true.And your point is? If gravity is true, then evolution is true too? Or maybe you mean to say that if I can assume gravity to be true, then you are free to assume that evolution is true. Let me tell you that if you can assume evolution to be true, then I can assume that God exists, and we can end the discussion here, with my victory, since we are free to assume to be true whatever we want to, regardless of proof.I thought it was obvious that he was using a god of the gaps after inventing a need.Unfortunately, mere thoughts are not stored on the server. You still need to type them if you want to address people's arguments.And yes, it is a God of the Gaps argument. The Argument from Morality has been dropped from discussion a while ago, and I am not aware that anyone has tried to restate it since.He wasn't sharing an opinion, he was using the bible to support his argument that we are wrong.I don't see how what he said applies to the questions at hand. If you do, you're alone on it.