azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Not t all I like quite a few games that don't have amazing graphics. Like now I'm playing a pixel horror called "crooked man" the graphics aren't amazing but it's an awesome game.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Can I suggest a game for you to play?
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Sure, why not? :) .................................................
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Its called Yume Nikke its a 16-bit psychological horror rpg. Its a free downloadable game. I wont spoil what the games about though XD
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Coo,l I might have to download that :D Thanks!.............................
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

sure :)
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Graphics is like the physical character of a person. In the start it makes the person very interesting, but if the person isn't very fun to spend time with the looks don't really matter.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Not exactly , but if the graphic is so bad that you can't even see things clearly than yes it will matter .
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Not really because Mario's graphics weren't so sophisticated and good ;they were mostly pixels; and Mario became one of the most popular games in the world with everlasting value.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Factorio :)
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Minecraft, Minecraft, Minecraft and MINECRAFT.It could be just me, but, I love games with cheesy or bad graphics. I hate games with realistic graphics..
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

A game can be excellent without good graphics.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

To a certain extent they do. Like... it's nice when a video game is aesthetically appealing. Like, I care mostly for story when it comes to movies. But if the special effects are garbage, the movie is going to be sort of disappointing.Old games in a time when graphics were shittier didn't have to compete that much on graphics. But these days if your graphics are shit, the game is most likely shit. Not to mention how easy it is to have a decent running game with all the available engines.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Graphics are the reason for the evolution in games. Why would anyone play video games if graphics didn't improve?
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

I respectfully disagree with you. The whole point of playing a game is to have fun not because of how realistic the game looks.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

But it just ends up that the games are alot more fun when they have better graphics.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

whats better gameplay or graphics?
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Whats better, gamplay or both? .
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

answer my question first.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Both. .
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

so tell me this. Would you rather play a game with bad graphics but horrible gameplay or would you rather play a game with awesome graphics but terrible gameplay.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Neither. I would rather play a game with good gameplay and graphics. I'm not saying that graphics are more important than gameplay, I'm just saying that they still do matter in a game.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

They don,t matter all that much, it depends on the game genre your playing but you have a point I would rather play a game with both.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

The better the graphics are in terms of realistic, the funnier the game is.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Realistic graphics don't make the game funny? If anything it makes the game look more serious and less humorous.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Graphics largely contribute to why games are more complex and lengthy due to the size in computing capacity. Old games were short and choppy due to less computing power.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

A game with bad graphics can be just as lengthy as games with good graphics. The reason why old games with bad graphics aren't long is because they didn't have the technology back then. Besides I'm talking about N64 and ps1 games not 8-bit and 16-bit games and oh by the way games back then where a lot harder to beat then games today may I remind you.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

In the movie industry their is the saying "location, location, location" and in the gaming industry it translates to "game play, game play, game play." Yes the graphics have evolved but really matters is the game play, which has evolved much further. If you gave a game like Call of Duty or Skyrim bad graphics people would still play it for the game play and if you have a game like Ace of Spades good graphics few people would play it. Why? Because the game play is terrible. The evolution of video games isn't from bad graphics to HD, its from this and this to this and this.And if people only played games if they had good graphics, why does minecraft have such a huge community?
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

I am not an gamer, but the gaming industry wouldn't be game play, game play, game play, it would be graphics, graphics, graphics. People play Call of Duty or Skyrim because of the graphics just like people played the early games because of the cool graphics then. People playing old games is just nostalgia. The evidence is even in your own answer, if playing games is about game play and some games are terrible, why would anyone play? The market would die.For instance, I don't play golf for the fun, I play for scenic landscapes and thrill of competition.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

1.If your not a gamer then you obviously have no place in this debate and you obviously don't have much experience with games.2.actually did you know more and more people are playing a game for its gameplay and not its graphics. Just because people value graphics more doesn't mean their important.3.I wont deny people value graphics back then and today but really that's not why someone should play a game just because of how realistic it looks, games are meant to be played for fun not because of "omg! the graphics on this game are awesome I don't care if the gameplay sucks"4.Nostalgia. That's partially true but there are some old games I have not played during my childhood that I enjoy playing even my little brothers who never grew up with a Nintendo64 enjoy playing the console.5.If people are going to be that retarded and not buy a game just because of how bad graphics are, then that's fine but I wont.6.A game with bad graphics can have a pretty level design take donkey kong country for example it came out in 1994 and the graphics suck compared to today but the game looks gorgeous and the level design is breath taking for a 16 bit game. :)
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Just because I am not a big gamer doesn't mean that I can't form an opinion from my own experiences playing video games.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

People don't play Call of Duty and Skyrim for the graphics, they play them because the game play has evolved a lot. The first call of duty had almost tank like controls, the campaign missions were very repetitive and there was almost no customization. In the most recent Call of Duty the campaign features a variety of levels, a zombie mode, class customization and very smooth controls. Same thing with the first elder scrolls game, tank like controls, clunky combat and not much customization or choices, in Skyrim there are better controls, combat and customization + a much larger world. The market runs on gameplay, I can't think of a single gamer I know who plays for the graphics. However, I know a good amount of people that play older games for gameplay, not nostalgia.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

It has always been about the gameplay its just that gamers fail to realize that. Also just because there is a sequel to a game series doesn't mean its going to improve and get better. Take sonic 06 for example its a sequel to sonic heroes and it sucks compared to it and then take mw3 it sucks compared to the prequels. The list goes on :/
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

If the video game industry is purely about game play, then why is Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony engaged in a fierce competition in producing increased graphical consoles. The simple answer is competing for the consumer, remember the consumer is the king in the marketplace, producers only curtail production to the consumer.For example, Nintendo introduced the original Nintendo, then Super Nintendo, then N64, then GameCube, then Wii, then Wii U. The same is for Microsoft with XBox, then Xbox 360, then Xbox 720.If gaming was purely about game play, all games would be purely complementary except some substitutions based on personal preferences. The video game industry would be boring because the competition wouldn't exist because no game can be differentiated to any other. But, graphical improvements in video games allows any game at any time to be a perfect substitution because better graphics transfer people to new genres of games.People buy or maintain old cars for nostalgia, modern cars today are superior in all ways. The same is for video games.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

1.Technically its about innovation not graphics, developers want to make graphics look more realistic so the player can feel more immersive in the game. It also shows the consoles innovative graphical capabilities.2.No its about graphics because it shows how innovative the games and console is.3.comparing cars to video games XD. Video games are far different and as for that opinion of yours on how people play old games just for nostalgia is complete bulshit true maybe some gamers but as for gamers like me we find that games back then can be just as fun as games today.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

What is the most prevalent thing in innovation of video games? That would be graphics.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

I play video games because their fun and to escape reality not for how innovative or how more graphically advanced it is.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

I get where you're coming from, I really do, however I think you would understand it much better if you were a gamer. As you said, the consumers are king in the marketplace and the demand comes from gamer. I'm just trying to say that its easier to understand if you played the games. I don't know if that made sense because I had two bowls of sour kush and write back to that with understandings.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Not only am I correct about how the video game industry evolves in relation to economics, but I was as a gamer in the days of Nintendo 64 and Sega Genesis and PlayStation 2, so from my own experiences, I felt that there were no special connection to the old consoles because there were better games and consoles. I could care less about the old games, they only exist as space takers. Also, if video games was about game play, why does Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo no longer produce the old consoles? Because the industry has evolved in graphics.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

because what is the point of having bad graphics if you can have better due to more powerful technology.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Bad graphics are crucial to software and hardware engineering, it is impossible to get to Wii U before Nintendo.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

However there are some gaming genres that need good graphics for example first person shooters and racing games. As for games like 3-d platformers and rpg's. Grapgics arent all tthat important. Most game genres don't need graphics. What people seem to forget is the whole reason to playing a game is to have fun,not to look at the games graphics. Games can ahve beatiful looking level designs with or without graphics I have already proven that. Graphics are important but their the least important factor of a game.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

First off, ignore what I wrote above, I wrote that when I was high.-----I never said the old consoles were better, I said that the advancement that made games better was game play, not the graphics. People don't play Call of Duty: Black Ops II because of the graphics, they play it because the original Call of Duty featured 33 guns and no attachments and Call of Duty: Black Ops II features 53 guns, 22 attachments, 15 perks, 15 camo choices, 8 wild cards and better controls. Also, if video games was about game play, why does Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo no longer produce the old consoles?First off, the notion of games not being about game play is just ridiculous. If game play didn't matter and people just wanted a wanted good graphics they would just order animated films from netflix because it is much cheaper and the movies have much better graphics. Secondly they produce new consoles because you need stronger and more powerful systems to run more advanced games. Take Morrowind or Oblivion for instance, even if you gave it the graphics of Minecraft older consoles and computers couldn't handle it. Why? Because you need an a strong system to run a game world of that size and complexity.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

The notion of playing video games absent of game play is not what I am suggesting, of course, people play for the game, but graphics have a bigger influence by the advancement in graphics because it is more life like
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Haha that must be why Call of Duty is starting to fail. Call of Duty's graphics have failed to improve at all.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

At least, someone gets how video game markets work.-------
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

just because most Consumers want graphics doesn't mean their important.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Actually, if consumers want graphics, then this is really all that's important.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

No it isn't. Going by that logic. If consumers want more illegal guns,then is that important?
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Your logic doesn't coincide with the debate topic. Video games are not illegal.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

So tell me this. Would rather have a game with bad graphics but good gameplay or a game with good graphics and terrible gameplay.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Well, I have played both, yet the latter obviously, but the whole point in a competitive marketplace for video games is good graphics and gameplay. The only scernio when gameplay is more important is when no more games are produced.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

Gameplay is more important. If it wasn't we wouldn't be having good games like skyrim,super mario 64,donkey kong country,etc.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: No

That because gamers these days are graphic whores only care about graphics and not its gameplay.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Yes... and absolutely not. Yes in a sense that graphics are very important since, well... we're deep into the 21st Century and graphics should be excellent. Absolutely not in the sense that almost everyone wants a good gameplay. That's what made Halo 3 so good. It had great graphics for it's time period, and its gameplay was amazing.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Depends on the type of game.If it is a action type game like Halo then yes but if it is a building type game like Minecraft not really
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

It depends. For a Action War(For example Call of Duty 4), Yes.For a 2D arcade video game(sonic), No.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

In some cases, games can be fun without amazing graphics... but if we hadn't improved game graphics, we'd be stuck playing games like Pong and Tetris still.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Lol of course they do. Its one of the reasons why I am playing Battlefield 3's campaign over Call of Dutys.
Debate: Do graphics matter in a videogame?
Side: Yes

Since this is now 2015, the emphasis should be on graphics. Those games with the latest state-of-the-art graphics should sell the most based on the latest technology.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I think meeting someone in real life is better because you get to see the person and hear the person speaking. There is the element of in-person contact.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

Friends are friends no matter where you meet them. But face to face real life friends are authentic because they have to be (you can see the lies or discrepancies yourself) while social network friends are hypothetical based on the limited information you gathered from each other over electronic media. It can be real, but it can also be sugar coated or outright fabricated.Ideally you should have a blend of both, and use sound judgment before trusting too much in anyone.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I am sure that it is much better to make friends in real life. They are the ones who really care about us and who we can count on anytime we need. Of course, I'll have all my real-life friends in my social networks; but not all my 'friends' in social media are my real friends. Most of them are people who I need to keep in touch with somehow. I strongly believe that having a friend in real life makes you feel much happier than only having them in social networks. So, I tell you: make real-life friends!
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I prefer in real life, because nothing's better than human interaction, eye to eye, be with someone else
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I think real friends are better, because you may be talking to someone you met on the internet and the chance of that person being a scam is very high, already having a real friend, you are there seeing the person in front of you, listening to the voice and knowing your personality
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I think that making friends in real life is better because you have more guarantee of who that person is, different from the internet.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

There are advantages for both sides. But for me, works more making friends in real life, because when people are chatting in the internet, you can never see what his intentions really are, you can't see if one's telling the truth or not, or even if he/she is the people you see in the photo. It's more reliable meet people face to face, share moments in time and space, and build a strong link between you and other one by living things together, that aren't just virtual ones.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

Making new friends is always valid, as long as the friendship is healthy and non-toxic. However, we have entered a complicated period, as the pandemic does not allow us to meet new people in person.So, from that point on, a question is addressed, is it better to make friends virtually or in person?Starting an online friendship is something different, as the person creates bonds with another even without being close to them. However, virtual friendship cannot reach the same level as face-to-face friendship, because the friendship that is formed makes the moment magical, unforgettable. Why generally face-to-face friendships are face-to-face.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I believe that making friends in person is better because it develops the ability to have a good relationship with people, in addition to meeting them in person is less dangerous.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

because I think it’s easier for you to connect with the person, and it’s easier to do programs when you’re together in person, which can strengthen the friendship
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I think making friends in real life is safer, because you have the guarantee that this person is themselves
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

Creio que quando socialisamos com pessoas em nosso dia a dia temos uma convivência melhor e conhecemos muito melhor a pessoas, isso é perceptível por exemplo em uma conversa onde você pode olhar no olha da pessoa com quem conversa e atendê-lo melhor, pois está vendo suas expressões corporais. Isso não é algo que vemos em conversas por mensagem de texto, publicações ou ligações via áudio através das redes sociais.  Por esses motivos eu acredito que fazer amigos "na vida real" seja algo melhor que amigos somente virtuais.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

A friendship in real life does not compare to a virtual friendship. The exchange of contact, of ideas, the fun with someone, the exchange of warmth between friends, laughter, nothing compares to that.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

Making friends in real life is better because you have direct contact with him, you really know him, and as a result, friendship becomes stronger and we start to trust more.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

It is easier to trust someone you really know. There is a son in the eye, a tight hug, he lives the best moments together, all of which makes a huge bond.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

Making a friend in real life is the only way you can truly know the actual person you're trying to be friends with. In social networks, relationships are empty and emotionless. While IRL they are warn and more intimate.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

In my opinion it is much better to make friends in person, because at least there you will be seeing that it is something uplifting and true, apart from that the experiences are much more nostalgic and affective
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

I am for making friends in real life, because making friends in real life you know who is this person, but in social networks it is impossible to know person as well as you can do it in real life. There is no guarantee that this person is really good. May be he at that moment sit in prison or may be he is a asexual maniac and etc. Social networks are not reliable way to make friends.
Debate: what is better: to make friends in real life or in social networks?
Side: in real life

You can also waste your precious time inchatting with someone whom you do not know well, because this can make you more isolated from the real world, and you might get frustrated when nobody is ONLINE, which is bad addiction.