azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

that fucking bitch and her family are responsible for more evil throughout history than any other family still in power.they should be removed as almost anyone else is likely to be better for humanity in the future...
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

that fucking bitch and her family are responsible for more evil throughout history than any other family still in power.That, sir, is quite simply patent nonsense.they should be removed as almost anyone else is likely to be better for humanity in the future.And what, sir, is the basis upon which you make this declaration?
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

"That, sir, is quite simply patent nonsense."While i do not agree that the British Royal family are responsible for more evil thorughout history than any other family you have to admit they have been responsible for a lot of pain and suffering over the centuries.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

you have to admit they have been responsible for a lot of pain and suffering over the centuries.I have yet to hear of any significant nation that has not.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

"I have yet to hear of any significant nation that has not."Thats very true, but you have to admit given Britains position as the worlds superpower the scale suffering was a lot higher than any other significant nation.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

Thats very true, but you have to admit given Britains position as the worlds superpower the scale suffering was a lot higher than any other significant nation.Well sir, though much suffering was caused, that is a matter of perspective. I believe that Spain was the worst of all colonial powers, by virtue of its decision to eradicate the entire Aztec and Incan races (barring a few lonely villages which still subsist on scraps today). Now, our conduct in India was at times good, and at other times bad, but the Indian populace still remains ambivalent today. A sorer point in our history is the conflict over Ireland, perhaps, but I do not believe that either side in that struggle can absolve themselves of some particularly iniquitous crimes. It was mostly the neglect of the late Victorians, both at home and abroad, that led to the frustration of the peoples of the empire. As a whole, however, I think that the British empire was, like every other empire in Earth's history, neither mostly bad, nor mostly good. I am quite proud, for example, that so many peoples are today united by language, custom and law, as has never before been possible. We are today at peace with those who have for the better part of a millennium been the bitterest of foes, our people are healthier and happier than we have ever known them to be and the nations' children are lifted from ignorance through universal education. I wholeheartedly believe that, despite its excesses, the British empire was ultimately and entity and a period that the western world needed to witness, to engender the era that we have today. It's not perfect, naturally, but it is better than it has ever been.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

What "evil" are you referring to exactly? Go on, give me some examples, that is if you can.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

Plenty. They are steeply involved in the deep satanic occult practices of Freemasonry.. like 33 degree which is the highest rank you can go. Most freemason's can't identify with it and don't even know about this different form of freemasonry and how crazy deep it goes. It's straight up Satanic Occultism. The queen is a decorated high priestess. Prince Phillip is a 33 degree mason as well as almost the entirety of all the high officials that hold a position within the realm of the crown.. even most law officials - even to the police in almost its entirety. They hide it very well and do not speak of it. This family is involved in some serious evil. It has been reported and investigated that it was indeed the "queen" who gave the order to kill Princess Diana. There is an entire documentary on it.. and IT CANNOT BE DISPUTED - ALL FACTS backed-up. The MI6 together with our FBI/Secret Service had been watching the Princess's every move. She became a threat after her infamous interview about Royal life and her marriage which was considered to be treasonous against the crown. For that she was murdered. And they have the power to cover it up.I used to have the highest respect for the Royals.. but they are truly evil and they do heinous things with the power they wield, under a cloak of dignity and grace. They aren't even English for sobbing out loud... they ARE GERMAN!!! They have family who served under Hitler - FACT! How is it that the English people put up with such a deceptive lie?? I would think the fact that they are not even true Englishmen would be a BIG DEAL. It is CRAZY how deep the rabbit hole of evil goes with the Royals. All within the walls of the high court and palace walls. I hope there is something good in Prince William.. because of his mother. I don't know much about Harry.. but I believe he is Williams half brother from a former relationship Princess Diana had. Either way, I pray for the Duchess/Princess Kate and that God will truly protect her, and that she together with her William do great things for the English people.But in all seriousness... the things the Royals are involved in will make the hairs on your head stand up.. and you will never see them with the same eyes again! For centuries they have practiced divination occultism, treachery and murder. They have A LOT of blood on their hands.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

By the way.. the Royals also helped FUND Hitler's cause.. along with the Catholic church - This is FACT!
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

By the way.. the Royals helped FUND Hitler's cause.. along with the Catholic Church. This is FACT!
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

Yes, the royal family are a bunch of assholes.--------------------------
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

No more asshole-y than any other general group of people. Even given their relative fame and slight inbreeding, well, I'd even go so far as to say that they're doing quite remarkably not being assholes.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

The royal family should be abolished. Any representation of a monarchy needs to be removed. It is an insult to individual power(or at least the illusion of it) which is the modern system of the world.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

I will say this again, removing the Royal Family is damaging to our income as a country. Many Brits even fail to know that the Crown Estate Treasury boasts a 230 million profit handed straight back to government. The 70 or so million we paid out to the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh is petty in comparison. Do people really think the government would justify that kind of hand out without an income? Factor in all the job losses from the Crown Estate employees and the loss of revenue from tourism and we're headed for a massive loss.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

"removing the Royal Family is damaging to our income as a country."Tough luck, a decision cannot be thrown out simply because it seems bad in the short run. With the removal of such laughable symbols of monarchy comes opportunity to make new systems that may be even more advantaged then the current disgrace to world progress that is the royal family. The abolishment of the royal family in terms of national acknowledgement does not mean they will be striped of wealth and estate. They should be stripped of all executive powers and advantages just by simply being in the royal family. "The 70 or so million we paid out to the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh is petty in comparison."And why are they paid? For petty executive presence? For a middle man? They serve as a mere symbol, albeit a money making symbol but none the less. " Do people really think the government would justify that kind of hand out without an income?"Governments do love to play favorites. " Factor in all the job losses from the Crown Estate employees and the loss of revenue from tourism and we're headed for a massive loss."Really? The buildings that attract tourists would all be there, the estate would still need managing, the only change would be that we all stop pretending that the royal family's purpose has any place in modern structure.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

Tough luck, a decision cannot be thrown out simply because it seems bad in the short run.It's not in the 'short run' the loss of money will be hard to recover.And why are they paid? For petty executive presence? For a middle man? They serve as a mere symbol, albeit a money making symbol but none the less.Exactly, that's the point. I don't have mega heart love for the royal family, I just understand their presence as a massive source of income for the UK in more ways than one.Really? The buildings that attract tourists would all be there, the estate would still need managing, the only change would be that we all stop pretending that the royal family's purpose has any place in modern structure.Do you really think the Royal Family are going to give tourists visiting rights to their buildings if they're not being funded? Do you really think they are going to pass on the Crown Estate Treasury profit to the government if they halt funding? Of course they won't. Bearing in mind they'd be lacking the money for the up keeping of their buildings and extravagant lifestyle those Treasury profits will be kept for themselves. They don't have to hand the profits over.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

Tough luck, a decision cannot be thrown out simply because it seems bad in the short run.But in such cases it must be demonstrated that the suggested action would indeed carry long-term benefits. We contend that yours does not. With the removal of such laughable symbols of monarchy comes opportunity to make new systems that may be even more advantagedMay I enquire, sir, as to whether you actually understand with what duties the royal family are charged with, and exactly where the boundaries of their power and influence lie? Her Majesty does not dictate policy, she does not set tax rates, she does not oversee the maintenance of the highways or of public buildings. She does not issue planning permission, recruit police or perform any of the other responsibilities that belong to parliament. Her major role is to command the utmost loyalty of the armed forces, and to serve as figurehead, a role to which she is as suited as any elected politician. In fact, I should go so far as to say that she is far better equipped in refinement and in breeding than many among the common mass of men and women.  The abolishmentAbolition. And to quote your own arguments "You should pay attention in English class, you appear to have a very weak grasp on correct sentence structure.".of the royal family in terms of national acknowledgement does not mean they will be striped of wealth and estate. They should be stripped of all executive powers and advantages just by simply being in the royal family.To be replaced by what? And why are they paid? For petty executive presence? For a middle man? They serve as a mere symbol, albeit a money making symbol but none the less.They are paid to maintain their estates and the elegance with which they, as our most prominent ambassadors, are presented to the world.Governments do love to play favorites.The major fault in libertarianism is that it assumes that governments are innately evil, while the governed are innately good. Really? The buildings that attract tourists would all be there, the estate would still need managing, the only change would be that we all stop pretending that the royal family's purpose has any place in modern structure.We reach a greater end by different means, sir. Do you have any substantial argument in favour of exsecting one of England's oldest and most hallowed traditions? Or are you content to masquerade moral indignation and libertarian malcontent as reason?
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

"Her Majesty does not dictate policy, she does not set tax rates, she does not oversee the maintenance of the highways or of public buildings. She does not issue planning permission, recruit police or perform any of the other responsibilities that belong to parliament"So in other words, she does nothing important in terms of economy and state security? Sounds vital. "Her major role is to command the utmost loyalty of the armed forces, and to serve as figurehead"Was she elected to that position? Is there a statue of limitation on the terms in which she is allowed this power? In the case of war would she be commander and chief? "And to quote your own arguments"You quoted my argument against a person who typed many sentences that made a toddler's writing ability look like college work. Regardless, "Abolishment is included in most dictionaries and appears frequently in all types of writing, but it is an unnecessary variant of abolition". My sentence still stands. "To be replaced by what?"The executive powers? That is for a legislative body to construct. "They are paid to maintain their estates and the elegance with which they, as our most prominent ambassadors, are presented to the world."So they get paid for owning big houses and looking royal? "The major fault in libertarianism is that it assumes that governments are innately evil, while the governed are innately good"I don't believe in evil or good as they are terms founded on religious thinking. I believe in that rights are the most important aspect of society. The way I view what a government should be structured on sprouts from this belief. The royal family is a tribute to a system that has oppressed countless people in history. That is my main problem with keeping the royal family rich, powerful, and worst of all revered. "Do you have any substantial argument in favour of exsecting one of England's oldest and most hallowed traditions?"A tradition honoring an oppressive system. "Or are you content to masquerade moral indignation and libertarian malcontent as reason?"What I perceive as moral has very little impact on my views. And if you see the belief in rights as the highest authority as malcontent fine, that is not the way I see it.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

What an american way of thinking, the only difference between our Queen and your President is that you elect yours and somehow that let's you believe you have an individual choice in the matter.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

I actually don't think the president should be a position held by one individual. Don't make presumptions about the way I think.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

"Don't make presumptions about the way I think."I'm sorry if you were offended, I'm just fed up of other americans on this site knowing nothing about history or Geopolitics and then making statements like "the Royal Family should be abolished".
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

You think your Royals are evil.. the American government is no different. These jokers practice Satanic worship too. YES! It is FACT and there is documentary PROOF that they do.. and are involved in secret societies. It's disgusting! They attacked our own nation (9/11) and blamed it on Iraqi's. Using our nation to rally behind them to go to war. While we took the bate and true patriots.. and our soldiers paid with their lives, in the name of a business deal "OIL". THIS IS FACT and also has documentary PROOF. Watch "LOOSE CHANGE" Yet even with all the evidence that it was an inside job, Americans refuse to truly believe it.. even get down right offended if you say otherwise. FACT: In America, the person who will be chosen to win the Presidency is decided 2 years in advance, prior to the elections. YUP! And literally almost the WHOLE of our nation does not even know that it is already pre-determined. It is a sick game. They make everyone think there is an actual electoral debate.. but the TRUTH IS they already know and have decided on who it will be. It's disgusting how they lie to the American people.. and we fall for it! They are master manipulators and liars and we are the ones who take the fall for their treachery, thievery and lies - the American government officials.. NOT the American people - have mad blood on their hands too. They have so much evil cover up.. that there are no words to identify the evil they do and inflict. If only people knew the truth. But even still.. most likely they wouldn't believe it anyway. TRAGICALLY SAD!Our president speaks nonsense all the time and make it as if it is the voice of the American people, putting words in our mouth against things and other nations that we ourselves would never participate in or even agree with.. when the words are clearly his.. NOT of Americans! He spins it and pins it on us! He's a cunning smooth talker.. and knows how to spin his words like the crooked salesmen he is. No wonder the world thinks we're arrogant, hurtful people who are bullies and walk all over everyone. It's because we have people within our government offices who do what they want, when they want.. where they want, and how they want. While the rest of the country has no clue that they devise and manipulate, and murder - while we Americans are sleeping. But hey, that's our president and government for you. They are no better than your Royals.. they're all in the same club. They are all filthy!Fact is GOD SEES EVERYTHING! And they will all get there's in the end.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

we don;t need no stupid queen or princess or prince they are nothing but mere distraction all they ever do spend ridiculous amounts of money with our tax money goes to them then goverment making our country look pathetic by saying we can;t protest or fact the goverment hiding secrets from us about the parasites of palace all this is distraction just to make people like us not see they are actually being paid to be a phony royal plus fact the queen is german not english so goverment is wrong and i wish those stupid people called paparazzi would be gone too
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

YES IM SICK AND TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT YOUR PATHETIC URCHIN OF PHONY PAID ROYAL ASS FIRST CLASS PARASITES I WANT THEM REMOVED SO I CAN GET ON MY WORK,GET MY MONEY RIGHT TIME NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT STUPID FESTIVALS MEAN NOTHING THAT MIDDLE CLASS SEEM TO DELIGHT IN PICKING ON POOR CLASS WELL STOP IT NOW!!!!!!! BECUASE I CAN TELL YOU THIS I KNOW LOT POOR PEOPLE FROM POOR CLASS THEY ARE POLITE COMPARED TO THE WAY YOU TREAT THEM AND YES IM IN MIDDLE CLASS TOO BEFORE YOU START ACCUSING ME BEING THE POOR CLASS LOW LIFE FIRST OF ALL YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REAL ROYALS ITS US NOT THAT PARASITE KATE OR ELIZABETH OR BLOODY CHARLES,WILLIAM,CAMILLA WE CROWNING GLORY WHO WORK HARD WE ARE KINGS AND QUEENS BEING ROYAL ISN;T ABOUT BEING COVERED ALL OVER STUPID DIAMONDS AND GEMS ITS THE HEART IS JEWEL AND OUR FAMILYS THE REAL ROYALTY UNITED KINGDOM IF YOU DON;T LIKE IT THATS MY OWN OPINION FEEL FREE TO RANT YOUR ARGUEMENT BUT THATS HOW I FEEL AND IM NOT JEALOUS BEFORE YOU STATE THATS END OF MY RANT WHY I SAID YES
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

These people belong to a past where we had no say, no power and were ruled with dictatorial powers. I have no love for them, and they still wield power, albeit much reduced.I am disturbed that there is no mechanism to remove the queen and the royal family! I don't want to have a system of control in place (the queen) who can declare war, pass or refuse laws and who can promote her son on a whim to Field Marshall! With no mechanism to remove them -they have dictatorial powers. I'm also disturbed the life they lead of privilege and wealth, it is nauseating when the rest of us have to work each day just to pay the bills. That is not to say I reject wealth and business. I believe any business person/entrepreneur who make and keep the economy are entitled to wealth, and should be congratulated -they have earned it.The royal family is a total farce and for anyone to support it needs to think and open their mind beyond the brainwashing. We could remove them and keep our democracy and our history intact.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

Actually the monarchy are not monstrous dictators, in fact in the past the monarch was very much well respected. In medieval hierarchy the Sovereign was anointed by God and was therefore, second (if you rule out the Pope) to God himself. Just look at the last time England did away with the monarchy in 1649- Charles I's execution marked a long ten years of unhappiness, fear and trepidation for the people. Oliver Cromwell's Republic did nothing to help the country as a whole and actually did more harm than good when taking into consideration the current relationship between Britain and Ireland (southern Ireland especially).
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

Who is this tithead is quoting what happened in the 15th/16th centuries as an example of what would happen NOW TODAY 21st century if the queen were removed from power?What kind of tit writes such shit? WE ARE NOT GOING TO HJAVE A CIVIL WAR IF THE QUEEN IS REMOVED. NO ONE WILL CARE A JOT. GOD GIVE ME STRENGTH how can people be so thick as to write such utter drivel??Get her out now, and spend the money saved on the hospitals that would be closed otherwise, The queen is just another woman, shes no more important than the many patients who need treatment.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: No, God save the Queen.

I would appreciate if you could be a perhaps a little more diplomatic when disagreeing with somebody on here, but I am not so sure that you know how to be. I quoted history because it happened. It's fact moron. I don't know if you haven't noticed but what has happened in the past helps us work towards the future; so the fact that the dissolution of the monarchy didn't work out too well IN THE PAST, then what good will it do now? Calm down and state your point with a little more dignity and then, just maybe, people will take your argument seriously.
Debate: Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II be removed, along with all royals?
Side: Yes.

ANd theres no God, so all your theory that they should have power because they were annointed by God is based on fallacy. So you support people just conning their way into power.Well done with that argument. but dont try and con people on this thread.