azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Fencing VS Wrestling
Side: Wrestling

I'm not going to lie, fencing is difficult it takes quick thinking followed with quick reactions, there are strategies and takes solid concentration. However wrestling is more difficult. It's not having someone's ass in your face it. Is nothing but hard work sacrifice and strategy. I'm not going to lie it does look gay for a distance however if you took time to learn the sport you would see how difficult it really is. Furthermore those two sports can not be compared. They are different one is stratige from distance and the other is stratige close, one takes strength and the other takes finess, one takes a lot of sacrifices, the other (I'll give the benefit of the doubt and say) minor sacrifices. However if we have to compare apples to oranges then wrestling takes much more out of you and let me say, you can fence year round, but you have to take a break from wrestling or else your body will cave in on itself, that alone should tell you people on the other side that wrestling is much more demanding and just plain difficult.
Debate: Fencing VS Wrestling
Side: Wrestling

Wresting is more interesting and with the WWE, there are plenty of colorful characters to entertain.
Debate: Fencing VS Wrestling
Side: Wrestling

We work hard to provide quick and dependable repairs because we recognize that a damaged roof may be extremely inconvenient and dangerous. | roof repair auckland
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

In cricket match is bigg timed but we don't bored because something happen every ball 6 or 4 EVen defending the ball looks interesting But in football u don't know will the Goal happen or not in this 90 mins u will just get excited when goal happens
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

Is there is anyone say from football or cricket is winner
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

This length of break is too in football means football is too booring to take a break in middle
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

How long is the break in cricket? How long does a single cricket match last?
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

cricket match is bigg timed but we don't bored because something happen every ball 6 or 4 EVen defending the ball looks interesting But in football u don't know will the Goal happen or not in this 90 mins u will just get excited when goal happens
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

Answer the questions. If cricket didn't suck so much you could answer the questions. It is worse than watching grass grow.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

It is big time match but we don't get bore because there is 4 and 6 and wicket and extras in every ball that doesn't make the match bored
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

What was the final score in the last cricket game you watched? What percentage of the final score is each wicket?
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

Boredom is relative. You call football boring just because of the number of goals in it, and because the way it is. We football fans like every minute of a match. There's so much to see for, passes, crosses, interceptions, and not to forget skills and dribbles by players. A football match is not boring to me, while a cricket match is, how static the game is. just stand there and swing the bat, watch where the ball goes.. how boring is that? conclusion: you can't call a sport boring just because you don't know how to cherish it. Any sport can be degraded in this manner.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

Anybody to say from football Pls write ..........................................pls.........pls
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

Why are taking out only mistake of cricket let me ask for football do you know that goal will be score in match u will get much bored if goal will be not done its boring man
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

We don't really need a goal to be entertained, the entertainment is the excitement on the way to scoring a goal, you never know when a team is gonna score. As I've mentioned earlier,watch. there are so many things other than a goal to watch. The fact is in cricket you constantly need a four or a six or a wicket to be entertained, which clearly shows how vulnerable it is. even cricket fans get bored in a test match. at the end of the day, it really comes down to you, whether you like a sport or not.. any sport can be criticized.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

I am only talking about the mistakes of cricket because you are too cowardly to discuss them.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

The final score was ind 309-3 aus 310-5 rohit sharma scored 173 runs  very interesting to watch his innings many sixes what classic it was not just like goal that is done sometimes
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

173 runs? That's insane. Each run represents .5% of the score. The runs become worthless.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

And then watching football is better to stare sky or if goal will be not be done is better to stare nothing..............
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

Anything could be happen till last ball isnt balled even if 9 runs are nedeed in one ball the match can be won but if 3-1 in football its 89 min can be the 2 goals scored in 1 min is that possible
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

. Even the shortest version of cricket is twice as longer than any football match, thus providing entertainment for longer duration of time!2. In football, for 90 minutes you wait and wait for a goal which may or may not happen. But in cricket there is some action-a six, four, bowled, run out- on virtually every ball. Thus, providing more reasons to cheer!3. Football provides just one time slot (i.e half time) for advertisers, while in cricket there are atleast 40 time slots (in T20 format). And then, if its IPL you can have ads in between deliveries also. Thus, making it more commercially viable!4. In football, for majority of the time you are shown just one camera angle. But in cricket, broadcasting is a challenge! You need cameras in every corner of the ground, you require technologies like hawk-eye, speedometer, snicko-meter, zoomer, hotspot. Thus making cricket more technologically advance!
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

Even the shortest version of cricket is twice as longer than any football match, thus providing entertainment for longer duration of time!xD xD is this why test cricket is so damn boring??
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

Debate is going on football and cricket and the hockey is more bore than football .......too booring is hockey
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

Boring? Isn't cricket so long that they take a lunch break in the middle?
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Cricket

5. All commentator do in a football match "Kaka.. Kaka to ronadinho, to giberto, passes it to Julio...". (Thanks, vuvuzella, now they are not required to do even this much!). While in cricket, you have to analyze each and every delivery or if its IPL, tell the whole world about the MRF blimp hanging in the sky. Thus, making the job of commentators tougher and more professional!6. Cricketers get full clothes to wear along with safety gears like helmet, pads, ell guard, chest guard. While footballers only get a small nicker to wear. Thus clearly showing that cricketers are richer and very well fed! 7. In terms of weekly salary to players, IPL is ranked No.2 in the world after NBA, while EPL is at 4. Again showing cricketers are richer than footballers! Refer Virat Kohli named sixth most marketable athlete ahead of Messi, Ronaldo8. Talking about popularity, here are some stats- Total population of 32 nations participating in football: 1541 millions. Population of just 3 cricket frantic nations (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) : 1572 millions. Clearly, cricket is popular among more people!
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

All commentator do in a football match "Kaka.. Kaka to ronadinho, to giberto, passes it to Julio...". (Thanks, vuvuzella, now they are not required to do even this much!). While in cricket, you have to analyze each and every delivery or if its IPL, tell the whole world about the MRF blimp hanging in the sky. Thus, making the job of commentators tougher and more professional!you need to understand what commentators do. they are supposed to talk about the ongoing match and facts related.in ipl, most of the time we have commentators giving their own shitty opinions with metaphors and proverbs more than just talking about the match
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

in football you get to scream and yell your face off and burn cars
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

In football you learn life lessons and your teams like your family. Also who the watches cricket. I don't think I've ever seen that on ESPN, fox, or NBC.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

Neither!We all know that hockey rules!And that hockey players are the toughest and sexiest athletes of them all.LOL.thanks for agreeing.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

Football is hard. It’s tough. It demands discipline. It teaches obedience. It builds character.Football is a metaphor for life. Players run 10-15 kms in a match whereas cricket a player hardly runs continuously. Football is the most popular sport. It's not only a game it's our life.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

"You will be nearer to Heaven through football than through the study of the Gita." — that is one of the most popular quotes of Swami Vivekananda. There's possibly nothing more to be said.
Debate: Cricket vs football
Side: Football

almost every cricketer has a beer belly. there are a few fit out there, but the unfit ones are clearly more in number just because the sport doesn't demand much. Football on the other hand, requires extreme fitness and stamina with pace, agility, presence of mind, with way more strategic playing than cricket. that should setlle things here.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

By virtue of word meaning alone, SUPERman is the most "super". The question does not qualify its definition of "super" to allow for any greater discussion.Which is more X? (Man + X) or (Man + Y)
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

can i say none its easily cat woman or that Chinese dude who played ray mysterio in a game
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman cannot lose - he is virtually immortal. I highly doubt Batman could get his hands too easily on kryptonite - would he even know to?Batman is a mortal - one blast from Superman's heat vision will blast a whole right through Bruce Wayne!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powers_and_abilitie...
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Sure, Superman is virtually indestructible, yet Batman is much more practical. Batman is the Dark Knight. He could his hands on kryptonite if Lex Luther can, he certainly can.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Batman figured out who Superman was within a week without powers and hes always carriers kryptonite 24/7 he figured it out before he ever met Superman because of Wayne enterprises dealings with Luthercorp.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Both

Technically, Superman is more super because he has powers while Bat man doesn't. I still think Batman is a better hero, though.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman is obviously more super because literally, he is superman. If this debate was about who was more batty naturally batman would win.Superman is also more super because he descended from a comet, now who has done that? batman did not even come from a bat, he came from a vagina.Superman is special and super, because he wears his undies on the outside. Batman also tried to copy him by wearing a black, cooler suit from the same manufacturer with a moth on it rather than his own logo.If only batman came to eat the bakchormee i prepared, he would be more super.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Even though I like batman moreSuperman is much more powerful
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

yes, batman is more practical and human, but the question is who is more super!!! Superman is way more super, even the word "super" is in his name. Plus, he has superpowers, which are also SUPER. so batman is not superer than SUPERMAN!!!
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman is a-lot better than batman because he is imortal and batman is mortal batman can't even hold krptonite and super man has real powers like flying and heat vision batman doesn't.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

OK so Batman is pretty cool but his suit is his powers.but superman was born with his powers and will always have his powers. Superman's alter ego is a man, Clark Kent, Clark is a normal everyday nerd. But Batman IS an alter ego for Bruce Wayne which really is a regular man. So the most "POWERFUL" would be Superman. His powers are in his body where as Bruce Wayne's are in his suit.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman would win because Batman doesn't have any physical advantages. If by super you mean cool, then Batman because he became a superhero by only using intelligence (and millions of dollars).
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Batman is stupid because he wears a mask at night where no one can see him. Superman is also stupid because he flies around in his underpants in the daytime. Ultimately it is not a debate on which of these 2 are more super. Because eventually, Chuck Norris beats them all.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

he wears a mask at nightbatman has the brains to not let his money and personal life get in the way of his batman life. therefore he wears a mask at night. he also comes out only at night because criminals mostly strike during the night. at night where no one can see him. why can't u see people's faces at night or is it that ur city is not lit with electricity??? unfortunately this isn't the case in gotham city.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

who the hell is this chuck norris anyway????? there are loads of debates around for him by the way. and also batman is the super-est if them all he can beat anyone and fights on his own muscle power whereas superman has many different supernatural powers which he uses to fight the enemy. if he loses all his powers then I'm pretty sure he'd become dead meat.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

superman-hence the name. batman's not even a super hero he is just super smart with a bunch of nick nacks.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

superman ...................................................................................................
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

simple equation -superman = batman - need for gadgets + super strength + invincibility + ability to fly + laser eye canons + xray vision + super speed (need i go on?)
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

super man is a-lot stronger and fster and can really fly not use a jet pack to fly around like batman does. Superman wears blue and red not all black like batman. and people don't know hes coming people know batman is coming because of his spot light.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Yet, in this universe, Batman is much more realistic.--------
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

True, someone with enough money and technological intelligence could become Batman (Bill Gates? lol).
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Batman isnt super, sure he's badass as all hell, but when it comes down to it, Superman is actualy super, he has powers.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman is better for the simple reason hes an alien who looks like a human who kicks so much ass it should be criminal plus he actually has super powers unlike batman who has all the money he uses to fight crime... as for superman he could light fire to batman's money ;) Plus Clark Kent is a way better name then Bryce Wayne...
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Who ever said that superman was an alien?It does not kick asses
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Batman is just some rich dude that wants to dress up in a dark black suit and a cape, he has no powers. I think he may have some childhood issues. I dont much care for superman either, but at least he can fly or somethin.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

superman!!!!!...this is the best super because he cant died
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

the word is right in his name! SUPERman so people open your eyes and use your brain its superman by far
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman, he is the best hero, he is there to protect the world while Batman can only do so much, people are saying that batman can just kryptonite but the fact is that super give it to him, as superman trust batman to handle him if he ever turns evil.now batman is mega awesome but so is superman. another thing is people say that superman was just born that way with all he's powers, but he had to learn how to use all his powers, it like how batman learn how to fight. superman is super, but batman is an awesome hero too. so if a nuke was heading for the city, i would choice superman to handle it then batman everyday of the week.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman of course...well because it's already stated on his name "super" man and he has superhuman powers.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Since Batman has no actual superhuman abilities (at least, none that we are aware of) and Superman has super in his name... well... case closed.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

Superman has the super powers and plus he can fly. He can prevent bullets from striking him.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

super man has powers batman relys on his intelect if batman gets shot he bleads not superman
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

can i say none its easily cat woman or that Chinese dude who played ray mysterio in a game
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Definitely batman because he has just as much skill as superman, but no powers and just gadgets. So because he has all the skills but no powers then he has to be superior.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

If Batman ever had to fight Superman, he would throw guano at him ;)
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/DefecatingSeagull.jpg Found that about a year ago.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

I feel that Batman is more "super" because he is more realistic, also the Batmobile is pretty darn awesome.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

batman is more super he hides his identity better no one's interested in reading superman but everyon dies for batman batman's more logical he is a human (whereas superman is from a different planet - an alien)his gadgets are supercool and superman doesn't even have any he's got more brains and solves myseries more easily super man can't be all that!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

i used to like superman but now i like batman. batman has the bat mobile the batcycle and the batcave. he also has jet packs and guns and stuff to stop the bad guys. he has some pretty sick weapons and he has a better secret identy.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Batman is obviously the better hero. He has better skills and is actually human. He also had to work for what he has, unlike superman.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Batman is more super because he has a secret identity, which means that he can do things that Superman can't. He also has really sick gadgets, he is the owner of a huge company which means he's rich(awesome), and at least he's cool, like c'mon, blacked out vehicles, and how big are the wheels on them?
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

nananananana batman. batmans got skill, he wasn't just born with his crazy abilities like superman was. look at it this way if I had the skill of a lion, who would be more super, a lion or me? the lion is just being a lion, I'm just a human and yet manage to have the same capability as a lion ...I'm talking bout strength, speed..etc.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Superman

superman is more super because he has lots of super skills that is why he is called superman
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

batman doesn't have any superpowers although he still uses all his normal powers to fight for the common people of gotham city!!!n batman has a really gr8 brain!!! n has the best car(batmobile) :D <3<3<3
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

I prefer Batman because he is a super-hero without super powers...besides, he has a cool car and toys.But I've always wondered about Superman...why does he stand and let bullets bounce off of his chest but ducks when the gun is thrown at him?
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Batman is way better and so amazing.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

well i think that you are black and he is not ver super cuzz i can kill him bro suck butt
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Here is the facts, Batman has a backup plan for any and all of the meta humans in the DC universe in case they cross the line, especially Superman he's known from the beginning what "Kent" was capable of if he ever turned. Voltaire said "You can not let the perfect be the enemy of the necessary" unlike Superman Batman understands that he's willing be the bully the world needs so that it can be a better a place Superman is to much of a coward to cross that line.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

This debate is utterly pointless. Superman has SUPER in his name.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Bat sounds better. And Superman wears a red underwear.Very communist.
Debate: Who is more super batman or superman
Side: Batman

Batman is more because if superman didnt have powers then he would not be a super hero but batman yes used his money but still he dose it with no powers.
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

coke is just better tasting to me then pepsi.
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

Nothing beats a Coke in a the old fashion glass bottle!
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Pepsi

i geuss you preffer to drink shit and spit with a hint of fuck you youre a gay motherfucking coke drinker
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

HEY!! COKE TASTES GOOD U ASSHOLEISH BITCH!!! TAKE A PEPSI AND SHOVE IT UP UR ASS
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Pepsi

HEY! KELIDIANEJ CAN'T SPELL YOU ASS HOLE BITCH! TAKE A DILDO AND STICK IT IN YOUR MOUTH SO YOU'LL SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

I like coke because of it's bubbly bite. Pepsi is just too mellow and sweet for me.
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

Diet coke.... best drink ever.
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

Oh yes, Diet Coke is far more palatable than Diet Pepsi.
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

Nothing like a good Captain and Coke!
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

By far! I can't stand the taste of pepsi.
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

coke is a better toilet cleaner then pepsi...scientifically proven
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

wuts the difference? i just like coke better...i guess
Debate: Coke or Pepsi
Side: Coke

The citric acid in pepsi makes is disgusting (in fact, pepsi destroys my brains cells and makes me act like I'm on drugs). Coke all the way.