azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

if the minimum wage was abolished then people with shitty jobs would be poorer than they already are.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

We live in a sick and greedy world when we honestly believe that it's morally acceptable to ask people to work for you at wage that is unfair and not enough to make a living. The only reason why would allow this is for our own greed. What we're really doing is allowing for legalized slavery. If you can't afford to pay a worker his fair wage, then you can't afford to be in business.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

if there is no minimum wage certain places would pay alot less then they should
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

Sure let's abolish minimum wage! So that employers can decide to pay their employees even less! People seem not to understand what minimum wage means.It's the limit of how low employers can pay you for your hourly work.Minimum wage is a good thing. If you are not happy with minimum wage, then work on getting a better paying job. It's simple.Getting rid of minimum wage isn't going to get you an increase in your pay.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

The minimum wage should be raised to $15.00. Hard working people deserve a nice wage.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

Of course not. If anything they should bring it up. You hear of people being constantly abused, malnourished, impoverished who are 'receiving below the minimum wage.' And if you want to get rid of the minimum wage all together, then you need to take a long hard look in the mirror..!
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

I don't think you understand the implications of a minimum wage. Basically, if someone's labour is so un-profitable that they can't receive a living wage from it, it means either demand is low, competition is through the roof or they're simply a shitty worker. In all three cases, you don't need the unemployment-guarantee of the minimum-wage to solve the problem.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

No, sir, i do understand. And when i say it should not be abolished, and should in fact be increased, i know what i am talking about.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

Refute both My and ThePyg's arguments as well as respond to the empirical evidence presented inthis argument.You make claims with no substantiation and then refuse to rebut and criticisms of those claims.-Why don't we just raise the minimum wage to a million dollars an hour. That would solve all of our problems, right?
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

Obviously not, because you made no attempt to form a counter-argument here.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

Then did you know that Singapore has just over 2% unemployment, the lowest percentile of average monthly wages is over $1200USD, and they've managed all of this without a minimum wage?
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

Ugh-Oh! Looks like you've been reading far too much Rothbard/Friedman and not enough Marx/Chomsky, unfortunately I don't have the time to particpate properly in this debate.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

I've read on Friedman, Rothbard, and Marx on the issue of economics.Chomsky more in the issue of Psychology.I like a lot of what Marx has to say, but the few times he actually proposes a minimum wage is not for the sake of increasing living conditions, and he seems to go at it more from the fact that Indian workers were exploited greatly in factories (a possible allegory to how he would feel about modern globalization). The abundance of the working class being so expendable caused the Bourgeoisie to be able to buy lots of cheap labor. With a minimum wage, the Bourgeoisie could only hold a smaller amount of slightly more expensive labor.Marx, in this case, is sort of irrelevant, for a minimum wage would be natural under Communist conditions, since the working class would be equal to the business class. However, we are living far from either a Marxist or free-market Capitalist dream, so minimum wage can be better explained by Friedman.
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: No.

Um, guys. There was a reason why the minum law was passed, look it up. It was becuase many employees worked there a off for nothing. Many big companies abused there power over their employees, treated them as slaves, and they didn't had enough to make a modest living. Without it, much of the middle and working class would not exist. We will be like China or some middle east country...
Debate: Should the minimum wage be abolished?
Side: Yes.

If they are a smart employee, they will not accept a job that doesn't pay enough. If nobody takes the job because they can't make a living off of it, then the company will be forced to raise their salaries to support their business. This is because of competition, which is the major difference between us and China or anywhere in the Middle East: we have a free enterprise system. Ironically, a place like China would be the only place a minimum wage would be a good idea.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

If the pregnancy was past the point were abortion was legal then yes. So if the woman was close to giving birth then yes, but if she were only like 8 weeks then no.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

YES!! 2 murders...2 deaths. Simple logic. It is ludicrous that someone would even debate this question. The poor defenseless unborn child would have eventually become a human being, just like you and I.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

i believe it depends on whether or not the baby was legally allowed to be aborted or not.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Yes, obviously if it was past the point where you wouldn't abort that baby you're treating that unborn baby like a person, so they shouldn't be murdered.I do think though that they should take more seriously the murder of the mother because the unborn child is debatable, as sad as that sounds.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Yes because both the mother and the unborn child have the right to live.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

But abortion is legal... so should a doctor who performs an abortion be charged with murder?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Can you imagine how ridiculous that would look in court ?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I'd like to see the look on the judge's face. lol
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Agrees that abortion is legal. I think it is okay to save the life of the mother, but otherwise no. To answer your question, I think the doctor be held accountable.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I think the doctor be held accountable.Accountable how? And why? You agreed that abortion is legal... remember I'm atheist so how is the doctor going to be held accountable? Why should he? He did nothing illegal.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I am prolife now. It is not because of religion. I just think abortion is wrong unless Mom's life is in danger. Just my humble opinion.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Okay... but you're acting a little like Srom now... (he never gets these kind of debates) your opinion on abortion doesn't really matter... the point is IF abortion is legal then how can someone be charged with killing an on-born kid/fetus/whatever you wanna call it?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Understands now. Thank you for helping me. The doctor cannot be charged unless the pregnancy is past a certain point. I believe that latest a woman can have an abortion is 24 weeks.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

The doc performs at the mothers request. If the mother intends to have the kid, and some doc aborts it, that's not legal. I don't know if it's considered murder. In the case of this debate, lets assume the mother intended to have the kid. Two lives have now been halted. Still don't know if it counts as double though.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

The doctor should be held accountable for what exactly? The only thing it seems a doctor did in this case was legally perform a surgery they were asked to perform. Just like they'd do for the removal of a limb, tumor, broken bone etc. In fact, and let's stick to facts please, if the doctor didn't perform the surgery that the patient wanted, had insurance for, and could pay for, the doctor would then be in legal troubles for turning this person in need of surgery down, as they would also be for any of the ailments mentioned before.I know what you're saying, I don't agree, but I know. You believe that abortion is bad, so you feel if the fetus is killed that someone should be held accountable. i'm just making sure you know that the doctor can't be held accountable for doing something he's legally obligated to do.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

It's morally inconsistent to say that while supporting abortion.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

I'm not even sure what in the heck an "unborn" child would look like...
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Agrees with your response. I now believe that life begins at implantation because I saw a picture of a baby born at 15 weeks. :)
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Seriously? You're going through my arguments and downvoting them?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

You downvoted me first. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

When ?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Today. You are the only one on with motive on right now. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Check my points, I haven't downvoted anyone in 23 days. If you're getting brigaded then it couldn't have been me since I'm talking to you RIGHT FUCKING NOW.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

You have downvoted me in the past though. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Okay, so you concede that it isn't me who is brigading you.I ask again, when?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Agrees that I made a mistake, but ye have done so in the past. I am here for conversation, not points. I am sorry for being wrong.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Being wrong isn't morally reprehensible, that being said, when in the past have I downvoted you?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I don't remember the date but you have done it. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

You have asserted this without evidence, so I will dismiss it.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

This debate is not about downvotes. It is about murder. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Also, downvote spamming is a pretty dramatic response for someone who "doesn't care" about downvotes.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

So? It's not like I can ask you via pm .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Send me a debate. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

This isn't something that needs to be debated; it's a simple and straightforward matter concerning the immediate reality.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

So you are unwilling to debate the relevent topic at hand? This debate is about whether the killer of a pregnant women should be charged with double murder. Do you have anything to say on that topic?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I don't think so. Mostly because the quality of life (or lack thereof) that the unborn and others would otherwise have (if the baby was born) cannot be determined.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Thank you. I believe that unborn babies have rights but I respect your right to believe as you wish.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

"Unborn baby" is a contradiction. I think that you mean "fetus" .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

The fetus is a baby that is genetically the same before birth as after.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

So? Your foot is genetically identical to the rest of your body. Either way, I find it ridiculous that you feel that "fetus" and "baby" can be used interchangeably.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

And I think is wrong to kill unborn babies. The unborn baby has the right to live.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Welp, now you're just reiterating your original claim, now that the reasoning for it has been proven faulty. Is that really the best that you can do? That was pretty weak.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Can you prove that life begins after conception? .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I never claimed that it does. That is not why I am not diametrically opposed to abortion.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

When I said that life begins at conception, you disputed me. When do you believe that life begins?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I don't give a care about when life begins. I merely claimed that "unborn baby" is a contradiction.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

When life begins is a serious issue. So sad that you don't care.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Really? Why should it bother me ?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

For me personally, I see the beginning of life as an important issue due to the implications.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

What implications ?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

WHAT IMPLICATIONS ?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Jesus! You don't have to scream... I was sleeping over here.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Sorry, I think that the quiet is getting to me ....
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

So... are you taking over for Atrag? Getting obsessed with Dana will drive you mad if you let it.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Yep. The "are men and women equal" debate would've given him an aneurysm.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Huh! Well I wasn't a fan. His whole anti-USAian bullshit was ridiculous and just stooopid.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Yeah, sometimes he did shoehorn a lot of "anti-USAian" sentiment into discussion. And he was usually sort of indifferent towards most users... But, think of all of the things that Dana would not have said if he wasn't around to engage her!
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

But that's the point, Atrag bitched and bitched about Dana but HE is the one that encouraged her all along.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

That is also true, I'm still going to miss the arguments.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Meh, he'll probaby be back or he'll start a new account.... if he hasnt already done so.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

The implications of abortion are that people will accept the murder of unborn babies.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

If it is legal, then it is not murder. It might make you uncomfortable, but the killing of what lacks the capacity for empathy and sympathy is water under the bridge.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Never forget that everything Hitler did was once legal. -Dr. King .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Are you seriously suggesting that a (legal) abortion performed by a mother is comparable to the (legal) deeds of Adolf Hitler? Welp, I can't say that I'm surprised.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

I used to support abortion, but not anymore. I was wrong. The same way that Hitler denied the humanity, of the Jews, the same way that the humanity of slaves is denied, the humanity of the unborn babies is denied in an abortion.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

There is absolutely no such thing as an "unborn baby", there are only fetuses.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Birth is just a change in location. The unborn baby is the same before birth as after birth.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

lol it still isn't a baby after birth .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Yes it is. It is a baby at fertilization. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I find it amazing that you have not figured out by now that saying the opposite of what someone else says.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

I find it amazing that you have not figured out by now that saying the opposite of what someone else says isn't debating.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

And now you are (once again) resorting to downvoting instead of addressing my claims. You wanker.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Yes I have addressed your unproven claims. The unborn baby has rights.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

No, repeating yourself does not count as addressing claims. I am seriously glad that we do not have the tax rates that you advocate, because if we did you'd be in some deep shit.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

This debate has nothing to do with taxation. This debate is about whether someone should be charged with double homicide for killing a pregnant women.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

Then the matter if when life begins is, by extension, irrelevant. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Saying that when life begins is irrelevant is like saying that the humanity of slaves is irrelevant to whether slavery should be legal or not. In both cases, human rights are being violated.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

The controversy regarding slavery and abortion isn't soley based on human "rights" as a moral concept. I oppose both slavery and pro-life policies because I feel that they cause more unhappiness than happiness, not because of some idiotic narrow deontological principles. If you think that we should uphold any principle for the sake of doing so, then you by extension are upholding one of the most detrimental mindsets in recorded history.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Thanks you for your response. Respects your beliefs on abortion. I used to be prochoice myself so I understand why you feel that way. It was not until I saw that preterm baby that i became prolife.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

Surely there are more important considerations in the question of abortion than how pitiable a fetus looks?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

The fetus is a human baby perfectly formed and genetically different from the mother at the point of fertilization onward.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

You've never debated with Dana before, have you ?
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

No, you don't. Your views regarding abortion have always been predicated on values, and mine are not.
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: Oh God Yes!

The fact that you just downvoted me proves me right. .
Debate: Should the Murderer of a Pregnant Woman be Charged with Two Murders?
Side: No, that's stooopid

So:(You being sure of it) = FACT ?