azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

we are speaking of homosexuality being wrongYou have yet to give one shred of evidence in favor of god-given moral objectivism.I as a Christian, love even homosexualsThat's BS and you know it.I just hate their sinWhat sin? You have not made a code for god-given moral objectivism, so it is illogical for you to assert this. And also, why is it a sin worthy of eternal punishment when homosexuals do it, but when heterosexuals have anal sex, the bible says nothing against it? Will straight people go to hell, too?it is just a means for more people to be doomed to hellYou have yet to prove that hell exists so your unfounded assertion is invalid.we need to put an end to an extra means of spreading STD's by this sickness. HA! STD's are not tied to homosexuality AT ALL! Heterosexuals can get it as well. So, logically (although you have shown logic and fact don't matter to you), you would have to be against ALL forms of inter-organismal sexuality. And simply because something has a chance for harm does not make it morally or legally wrong. Eating a burger has potential health side effects, but you Christian homophobes aren't whining about people who eat burgers or depriving their rights.watch your language lil guy.Stop depriving millions their rights.You go ahead and take it up the butt 1. Homosexuality is not tied to anal sex, so you (yet again) have no point.2. I am not gay. I simply don't hate freedom and innocent people unlike most Christians.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

I have given all the evidence I need. You need to go and watch ShockofGod vids - his videos. He was once an atheist and he wised up. He could teach you a lot. It isn't BS, I do love all people. I hate sin and I even hate my own sin. We all sin and fall short of the glory of God but He saves us through His mercy. The bed is undefiled between a married couple - which was designated to be a man and woman union and that is clearly stated in the Bible. You will see that Hell is real when the Rapture occurs. Whether you are raptured with the Lord or whether or not you will have to endure Tribulation. one thing rings true, Hell will be shown to people just how very real it is. Not a single evil thing on this earth will be able to compete with Hell. HIV is rampant in homosexuals and you know it's true. Homosexuality is a demon possessed disease, pure and simple.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I have given all the evidence I need.This reeks of narcissism and snobbery.You need to go and watch ShockofGod vids - his videos. He was once an atheist and he wised up.So everyone who agrees with you is wise and everyone who disagrees is stupid?It isn't BS, I do love all people.Right. I believe it was you who said that homosexuals are gross.I hate sin and I even hate my own sin. We all sin and fall short of the glory of God but He saves us through His mercy.That is a big leap of faith.The bed is undefiled between a married couple - which was designated to be a man and woman union and that is clearly stated in the Bible.The bed is undefiled in you don't sleep in it.You will see that Hell is real when the Rapture occurs. Right... And your evidence being?and ditto for every subsequent statement you make.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

It's grossThis is the most reasonable argument you've given. You find something to be disgusting, and so it is wrong. I find felching to be disgusting, and so, in my mind, it is wrong. However, I would never dream of forbidding two consenting individuals from felching; likewise, I would never dream of forbidding any two consenting individuals from engaging in any practice which does not bring harm to those who are not willing to potentially suffer any accompanying harm.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Felching sounds rather gross. It doesn't sound right, and if it doesn't sound right well.... Think about it.... I Don't understand how people that are for homosexuality hate being called a homosexual? There's supposedly nothing wrong with it so why do you get upset over it? I truly don't understand it....
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I Don't understand how people that are for homosexuality hate being called a homosexual?1. You can be "for homosexuality" without being an homosexual.2. Your argument is a generalization; there may be some who do not like to be referred to as "homosexuals," but surely there are others who don't mind.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Or maybe those who support it have homosexual fantasies??? Interesting...
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Or maybe those who support it have homosexual fantasies???Maybe those who don't support it have homosexual fantasies?
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Trying to be slick or funny, it didn't work lol. No I don't but for some odd reason I feel you do, I feel it in my bones, the little ones.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Trying to be slick or funny, it didn't workI wasn't trying to be funny. I was completely honest in my appraisal.No I don't but for some odd reason I feel you do, I feel it in my bones, the little ones.Don't try to personalize your arguments. Attacking me will do nothing, especially when the attack is completely groundless.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

i believe homosexuality is not a choice people are born a certain way and shouldnt b judged upon even i necessarily dont think itz right but thats jus how people are and should b treated just as everyone else
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

It's gross and just plain old unintelligent and immoral.As for gross. I find spiders gross. Yet, nature deems they mate. If nature can cause something which I personally find gross to be the order of things, why should it not find something you find gross to be the order of things? Are you ominscient and all powerful with this ability, or are you forcing your personal preference on others?As for unintelligent. I'm assuming in terms of continuing the species, however this in itself is unintelligent. The most "intelligent" course if one is not inserting their own instinct is to not have children, them being an economic strain. It then must be assumed a desire to mate for procreation is not intelligent but instinct. If you are following desires based on instinct it is no more or less intelligent than another following desires based on instinct.As for moral. Morality idealy would be a tool to ensure the most good for the most people, even christians would agree I would think. I fail to see in what way two people's actions in a bedroom would effect another. It cannot be immoral in any shared sense of humanity, it requires a doctrine to redefine morality, then to force this on others... which by a shared morality would be immoral in fact.It needs to be stoppedHumans have survived with it for hundreds of thousands of years in similar percents, during periods when it was far more mainstream than presently, and during periods when it was less mainstream than presently. There has never been an example of when it has done any undue harm to individuals or society as a whole. None.only if the parents would get more active in their child's lives to teach them right from wrong.A parent can no more teach a child physical attraction than they can teach a child to breath or a child's heart to beat. It is a natural phenomenon, and no more right or wrong than any other natural function.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Oh David, don't tell me you support homosexuality too? Yes, spiders are gross. Nature designed a male and female to go together and you know it's true. It is very unintelligent to even not understand the design of anatomy and what it is and was intended for. You are an atheist and being an atheist must make you feel justified in your sick beliefs. Come on now David, I can't bear to read more that you have posted here. You are more than this. I am really disappointed in you David.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Oh David, don't tell me you support homosexuality too?I support anyone I see society suppressing unjustly, I'm all Jesus-like in that way.Nature designed a male and female to go together and you know it's true.Mhm, except all those gay plants and amoeba, obviously devil spawn.It is very unintelligent to even not understand the design of anatomy and what it is and was intended for.I find the female vaginal tendency to bleed once a month a damn near fatal design flaw. I believe it may be nature's way of telling me to stick it in the ass more often, in that case.You are an atheist and being an atheist must make you feel justified in your sick beliefs.Naturally, that's must be it. Never has there been a gay theist nor even a theist who supported gay rights I'm positive.Come on now David, I can't bear to read more that you have posted here. You are more than this. I am really disappointed in you David.All people are greater than the sum of their arguments on any debate site I'd imagine.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Ahhh and I thought you were going to be my favorite I have run across. I am sorry you feel like when a woman is on her period, that is time to have anal sex. The anus, itself, is mean't for ridding the body of excrement. Why would you want to dip there?
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

The anus, itself, is mean't for ridding the body of excrement. Why would you want to dip there?Body parts have many duel purposes. Anal sex feels pretty damn good, I'd call that a reasonable second purpose for an anus, quite like how kissing feels good, yet serves no real biological purpose.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Well, you say anal sex feels good and so do many other evil things such as taking drugs and just because something feels good means it's right. A kiss is biblical and found in the Bible. A kiss does have biological uses as it allows mates to taste and smell each other's pheromones.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Holy Hell, are you stupid?Most people have sex because it feels good. And also, that kiss is biblical statement? What purpose does "smelling and tasting" each other's pheromones have if they're already mating?
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

You are wrong. It is not immoral to be tempted with homosexual urges.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

You should repent if you have those urges. That's the normal part.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

You are wrong. It is not my fault. It is not a sin to be tempted.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

If you think that then why dont you just stay out of it. what if you loved someone with all of your heart and you wernt allowed to be with them becasue they were of the same sex? How would that make you feel? It dosnt need to be stopped, sometimes it cant be helped its not like pple go "oh im gonna be homosexual cuz my life sucks and thats gonna make it better" eventhough they know its not. No people dont just say that stuff sometimes its not even their choice. it may be something there born with. and parents should accept their child no matter what
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

Good person I implore you to not attack parents for allowing their children to blossom into the children that God has created them. It is not a parent cause problem nor is it a choice. Right from wrong only exists within a person individually. Your rights and wrongs could be different from mine, there is no "law" that tells what is right and what is wrong.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Your statement sums up the intelligence of arguments against homosexuality. I have yet to see one intelligent argument against homosexuality. Even the Bible has comparatively little to say about it compared to hoarding possessions and usury. It's about as evil as eating shrimp.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

no waythat's too inappropiate especielly if they have children, this tells them that they could do that too in school which could be against the law
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

It's so sad that people like yourself are flooding CreateDebate with inconsiderate and blatantly wrong comments that are filled with grammatical errors and mixed and unorganized thoughts. Seriously. I mean, you have 5 points and you just made a completely uneducated comment that actually does not make sense to me. It's pissing me off. CreateDebate is not a place for people with the IQ of a banana. Fuck off!
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

DAMMIT. I have officially blown a gasket. -Fuck you, homophobes. I am damned tired of people denying people basic rights because some fucking 2000 year old POS book claims that gays should burn in hell for all eternity for doing something that is 100% natural.-These fucktard, anti-gay, piece of shit, Christian (only the dumb christians), uneducated, freedom-hating, jackasses thing it is a choice and believe moral objectivism.Ok. Let's assume these morons are right. Why then, would god give his children free will only to send them to hell for using it?! And this moral objectivism bible bullshit has been disproven time and time again. -Screw you homophobes. You are mored deserving of the punishment you seek to impose on gays. Let them be. They are not freaks of nature. Homosexuality is natural. Why then, would god create homosexuals only to have them burn in hell!?ok...I feel better now.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

DAMMIT. I have officially blown a gasket.Sorry to hear that.Fuck you, homophobes.Is it just me or are anti-homophobes becoming more judgmental and hating than homophobes themselves? I am damned tired of people denying people basic rights because some fucking 2000 year old POS book claims that gays should burn in hell for all eternity for doing something that is 100% natural.Well I agree that these people should not impose their personal views onto others, but they should be perfectly able to hold these views. These fucktard, anti-gay, piece of shit, Christian (only the dumb christians), uneducated, freedom-hating, jackasses thing it is a choice and believe moral objectivism.YOU ANTI-HOMOPHOBES!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU JUST SAID THAT! THESE PEOPLE ARE JUST TRYING TO PROTECT THEIR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS FROM HELL! Ok that was somewhat sarcastic, but still for someone complaining about discrimination and hatred you sure are doing a lot of it.Ok. Let's assume these morons are right. Why then, would god give his children free will only to send them to hell for using it?!It's the way they use their free will that determines whether they go to heaven. What's so hard to understand about that?And this moral objectivism bible bullshit has been disproven time and time again.Oh really? Would you like to support this? Why then, would god create homosexuals only to have them burn in hell!?That's not what is believed. Since Christians think homosexuality is a choice, the misuse of free will to be gay is why they burn in hell. ok...I feel better now.You should invest in a stress ball.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

are anti-homophobes becoming more judgmental and hating than homophobes themselves?No one is anti-homophobe, they are pro-freedom. If they are judgmental against those who wish to oppress a group of people, then their disgust is warranted. they should be perfectly able to hold these views.That doesn't mean they can impose them on others, which is what they have done.for someone complaining about discrimination and hatred you sure are doing a lot of it.I'm fine with harsh speech, as long as it is founded in fact and logic. Mindless, ignorant, stupid oppression and discrimination, however, I will not stand for.It's the way they use their free will that determines whether they go to heaven.You can't use your free will to change your sexuality. That is absurd. That's like creating women, then punishing the, for being women for no logical reason, and the justifying this by saying they chose to be women. But really, I wouldn't expect any better from these neanderthals.Oh really? Would you like to support this?You have the BOP. I'm not going to disprove what hasn't been proven to begin with.Since Christians think homosexuality is a choice, the misuse of free will to be gay is why they burn in hell.Simply because neanderthals think it is doesn't make it so.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I personally believe some people do choose to become homosexuals, but I am also aware that many are born homosexual. So I particularly agree with your statement about women being born that way. It's not a choice in many cases to be homosexual.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

First argument: "Fuck you, Homophobes"Second Argument: "No one is anti-homophobe"Also you skipped over his some of what he said he was talking about peoples rights to have differing veiws on the subject of homosexuallity, stating that people still can not impose those beliefs on others. And who defines what is "Mindless, ignorant, stupid" arguments. True sometimes it is easier to spot out than others, but still it depends out our own perspectives and biases.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I have a lot of respect and appreciation for your intelligent outlooks on many different things. I find that I agree with you more often than not. I simply ask a light hearted request that you not let your emotions get the best of you, because I like you as a debater.It’s hard to do sometimes, I admit, but it can be detrimental sometimes.In ancient Greece, the definition of a ‘sage’ was a person who didn't allow their emotions to take over or cloud their reasoning. I don't perceive that your reasoning is clouded; I agree with your overall position, but your response somewhat resembles an outburst, and I think you have the ability to be sage-like.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

I simply ask a light hearted request that you not let your emotions get the best of you, because I like you as a debater.You are right. That is exactly what happened. While I still mean every word I wrote, I agree that it was a harsh way to put it.It’s hard to do sometimesYep...the definition of a ‘sage’ was a person who didn't allow their emotions to take over or cloud their reasoning.That is great piece of information. I will take your advice... :)-And I'm sorry I am replying so late. My Activity page apparently neglects to show me ALL of my activity. Ah well...better late than never, I guess.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

damn Apollo what side are you on first cancer is a sin along with you saying some crude stuff about gays now your for homosexuality.lolz guys there is nothing wrong with homosexuality, everyone can make a choice that is natural, gay, strait, bye what ever its you choice in life to make decisions.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

No.its not natural.how are you gonna have kids with someone of your own gender.if it was natural men would have been giving birth.because every organism that is divided into male and female groups have the males and females attracted to each other so they can reproduce.not only animals but you don't see the north pole of a magnet attract the north pole of another magnet.instead the two pole push each other away.SEE its the law of the universe.so you carry on being gay you gonna disrupt the space time continuum :)and the reason God said No to homosexuality is because if there is an apocalypse and there is only two gay men left and one woman .the human race will be doomed.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

So.. You think that you can just say the Bible is wrong. Well you may be wrong in this situation, you see this all binds up together, their are christian believers.. On the dollar bill it says "In God We Trust". Not "In Gays We Trust". Or "In Buddhism We Trust". So listen, now that I have covered that Christianity is real, I will now say my final parts. So, Adam and Eve is true, remember that. The Bible says not to be gay to remain with a women. One more thing, It's Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

How does a piece of paper used as currency prove that Christianity is real?And it was necessary to be Adam and Eve, because that's how the story moved on, they had children. Doesn't mean that Adam and Steve are bad people, just not necessary to that part of the story.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: For

So.. You think that you can just say the Bible is wrong.Not only do I think that, I regularly do so.The bible is utter nonsense. Well you may be wrong in this situationLogic doesn't work that way. You have yet to fulfill your burden of proof supporting the bible. I have pointed out numerous self-contradictions, scientific impossibilities, factual improbabilities, etc.You are pre-supposing validity. Sorry, but you can't logically do that.you see this all binds up together, their are christian believers.. And your point? There are flat-earthers, as well. There are holocaust deniers. Simply because a belief exists does not make it true.On the dollar bill it says "In God We Trust".Unfortunately, it does. Would you like to know why? In the 1950's, the radical christian nuts fought to spit on the constitution and ignore the separation of church and state and arrogantly place their pathetic sign of intolerance to declare to the world how "righteous" we are.Not "In Gays We Trust". Or "In Buddhism We Trust".What the fuck are you talking about? So listen, now that I have covered that Christianity is realYou have done no such thing.So, Adam and Eve is trueAgain, you can't pre-suppose validity any easier than I can pre-suppose fallaciousness. You have given no evidence supporting this and I could give you scientific evidence directly contradicting this.The Bible says not to be gay to remain with a women.Again, at this point the bible is still utter nonsense.It's Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.How original.
Debate: Is homosexuality wrong?
Side: Against

Homophobic is a fake word created by the homos themselves and the others who support the filth. It's not natural stop saying that lol! Male and female, the male impregnates the female to reproduce. The penis was made to go in to the vagina, the penis wasn't made to go in a butt which is FACT. Cussing, that shows a lack of intelligence my dear boy. These so called "morons" are right. The more common type of Christianity practiced by most Christians today is watered down and made to not step on any toes whether it's wrong or not, the more common Christians aren't supposed to act in the same way as non-Christians as they do so therefore any  Christians that believe it is okay aren't real Christians yet. I never said to punish them because I won't be the one punishing I'm just telling them to stop so they won't be punished, not to mention tolerance for sin is sin, you figure out what I mean by that on your own. God didn't create homosexuals because they choose to be one, they aren't born that way you know.