azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Yeah, I'm straight, I have feelings. But me being straight is completely irrelevant, so is other people being gay. It shouldn't matter if you are gay or straight, fat or thin, black or white. Two gay people can feel an equal amount of love, than that two straight people feel. It's because of people like you, voicing your negative opinions on the gay community, people are scared to come out of the closet. There shouldn't even be a closet in the first place because they shouldn't have to hide! You being a homophobic is just as bad as you being racist or you being sexist. I'm sure if the tables were turned and it was straight people who had a limited amount of rights you would feel differently about the situation, but until something like that happens I suppose you are too shallow and ignorant to even consider how others feel.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Nobody deserves second-class citizenship. Not any particular ethnicity, nor any particular sexual preference.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

What about age? I am positive that the argument could be made insisting that children are the slaves of today. They can't buy porn, cigarettes, alcohol; they can't drive, go to R rated movies. They need an adult's signature for nearly everything else. They are second-class citizens.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Childern are and will always be a different story. They have less rights to protect them from themselves. They have nothing to do with this argument.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

So you are saying that nobody deserves to be a second class citizen unless the government decides that, up to a certain age, they're better off being a second rate citizen? What difference is it going to make if I buy a pack of smokes the day before, or on the day of, my eighteenth birthday? I realize this is an issue not of the government but of individual theaters themselves, but what difference does it make if a fifteen year old, or even a twelve year old, wants to see an R rated film without their parents? Most often it isn't anything they haven't seen before, and I'd say that when it comes to the nudity in such films, it'll be a lot less graphic than they are used to.We should stop trying to protect children and treat them like human beings, no more or less valuable, or protectable, than anybody else.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

So you are saying that nobody deserves to be a second class citizen unless the government decides that, up to a certain age, they're better off being a second rate citizen?Yup. Children are not citizens, they are children. When I was a child, I felt rebellious like all children, feeling like I wasn't being treated fairly by adults. Well, then I grew up and realized that being an adult is a pain in the ass. Children have it good when they are of the Middle or Upper Class. They have nothing to bitch about that's really important. The only problem I see is when adults don't show them exactly how good children have it and instead become angry, bad parents over the fact that they children get to enjoy luxuries!That's right: children enjoy luxury while having less rights then adults. There is nothing wrong with that. It's totally balanced. And if a child is so incredibly emotionally and/or physically broken by his or her parents, then he/she may emancipate! You children have the rights to become adults out of your own fruition and hard work!You have too many rights sometimes if you ask me. The courts favor you, the government favors you, all organizations favor you, society favors you; all while your hard-working adult parents are trampled by their bosses for not bringing them coffee on time.You need to stop complaining about not getting to see mature movies and start enjoying what you have, boy, because unless you practically kill yourself working, you won't get to have enjoyments ever again like this in your life while you're an adult!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

I am, in a way, playing devil's advocate with you. I believe in giving children more rights and responsibilities, but in the following argument I think I go overboard.Children are not citizens, they are children.I wouldn't be too surprised if, 150 years ago, people said something along the lines of niggers are not citizens, they are niggers!When I was a child, I felt rebellious like all children, feeling like I wasn't being treated fairly by adults.Surely a common, but most likely not universal, sentiment by children. Which leads me to ask: why should those who fail to harbor such animosity be forced to suffer because there are those who give their kind a bad name. It's like accusing a black man of thieving simply because he was the only black person within a mile of the theft - the individual must be considered, not the collective as a whole.Children have it good when they are of the Middle or Upper Class.In many ways, they have it too good. Spoiled with possessions by parents who spend more time at work then with their family, encouraged to remain indoors with the latest Nintendo rather than play outside for fear of stranger danger. It sure is a good time to be a kid.Maybe they should get a glimpse of the real world, not the protective bubble put up by overprotective parents?They have nothing to bitch about that's really important.They're children, what is important to a child rarely is important to a more rational human being. That's right: children enjoy luxury while having less rights then adults. There is nothing wrong with that. It's totally balanced.As a libertarian, I beg to differ. It is no different than saying that, under a system of absolute government control, you can get the best cars and entertainment, and live an otherwise nice life, but simply without freedom. I want freedom to suffer and to experience the world as it really is. Why should children be any different?And if a child is so incredibly emotionally and/or physically broken by his or her parents, then he/she may emancipate!Something not being done often enough. I call for total emancipation of all living beings! No more must my herb patch be subservient to me! Be eaten by he whom you wish to consume you!You need to stop complaining about not getting to see mature movies and start enjoying what you have, boy, because unless you practically kill yourself working, you won't get to have enjoyments ever again like this in your life while you're an adult!I'm not arguing for myself, but on behalf of children. I yearn for the innocence of childhood again, of sneaking into restricted movies, and of being free from the stress of everyday life.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

I wouldn't be too surprised if, 150 years ago, people said something along the lines of niggers are not citizens, they are niggers!Right, because we take away rights from children based upon how they look and not the fact that they cannot support themselves.Oh, wait.Which leads me to ask: why should those who fail to harbor such animosity be forced to suffer because there are those who give their kind a bad name.This is not about punished children for being rebellious, this is about protecting their growth. I was using my childhood as an example to show that I can sympathize with both young and older views.Maybe they should get a glimpse of the real world, not the protective bubble put up by overprotective parents?I agree, but this solution is not to pop the bubble and give them the same citizenship as adults. The solution is to help them understand what the real world is like, as opposed to coddling them or mistreating them.They're children, what is important to a child rarely is important to a more rational human being.Right. Why should we give them more rights therefore if they aren't unhappy about important things? The only thing that makes a child unhappy is when their luxury is distrupted, not when there is a truly unjust violation of their rights. Though I will not deny that it can happen, it will not happen in a common situation.As a libertarian, I beg to differ. It is no different than saying that, under a system of absolute government control, you can get the best cars and entertainment, and live an otherwise nice life, but simply without freedom. I want freedom to suffer and to experience the world as it really is. Why should children be any different?Because absolute freedom doesn't necessarily equate to happiness. That's the only problem I have with this view of yours. Order is not a bad thing, nor is freedom; but neither are as important as happiness. If you give someone enough freedom to be happy and in return press upon them order only to the point in which the order does not disrupt their happiness, what's would be the problem?There would be none.Something not being done often enough. I call for total emancipation of all living beings! No more must my herb patch be subservient to me! Be eaten by he whom you wish to consume you!Either you're being silly with this statement, or you're more of an anarchist then a libertarian.I yearn for the innocence of childhood again, of sneaking into restricted movies, and of being free from the stress of everyday life.Children have enough rights to escape stress without breaking the law or being complete idiots (i.e. premature sex, drugs, stunts, etc.). We should impose this on them. They practically have too many rights as it is.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Well, who am I to judge? Marriage is entered into for many reasons...so the wiki says. Virtually none of them say it is to have children, but it does say it is to protect children. I guess I would say...let it be so!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

why you have said that people can not have sex between the same gender? they can, and it is normal. they are also people,we are all people. and they have rights to love... and one more anout the God, people who are homosexual, they are made by God because They are born eith this, and not become gays or lesbians
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

You need a man and a women to reproduce and get more people in this world.it does not matter which couple is it? homosexual or heterosexual. some people do not want to have children! they just want to make their relationship official.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

people how can you be against? it is only just steryotype of people. because it was made many many years ago and everyone follows this stereotypes...
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

The majority of people on here are on your side? How can they be following "stereotypes...made many many years ago" which are opposed to homosexuals if they are apparently pro gay rights?
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

I believe it should be legalized because love is something homosexuals, bisexuals, and straight people in this world all experience. You say that gays shouldn't be able to get married because marriage is something special for just a man and a woman, but I've seen many of those types of marriages ending in divorced, or they are just getting married to inherit their spouses wealth. Does that sound like what you argue is the sanctity of marriage? I believe anyone should be able to get married in this country because this is America. Civil Unions and marriages are very different. Those who beg to differ I have one question, want to trade your marriage for my civil union?? I didn't think you would.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

So you're saying gays should be allowed to marry because heterosexuals have a high divorce rate? That's a new one...
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

It seems to me that they are simply pointing out that those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, but here's something that might be a little more familiar; "Thou hypocrite! First cast the beam from thine own eye, and then shall thou see clearly to cast the speck from thy brother's eye." That, right there, is Matthew 7:5. You know, The Bible.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Same-sex marriage is a civil rights, political, social, moral, and religious issue in many nations. The conflict arises over whether same-sex couples should be allowed to enter into marriage, be required to use a different status, such as a civil union, which is usually more limited, or not have any such rights. A related issue is whether the term "marriage" should be applied
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

To my mind, everything in this world changes and because of that the understanding of humans' relationship also became different. so why not? maybe today people get disappointed in the opposite sex and they change their mind? Today the inhabitants of our planet have a free right to choose whaterver they want and I do support this idea.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

Yeah who knows, we might get sick of humans and start getting married to other mammals. I guess this would be fine...
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Because, obviously, other mammals have legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

Trust me, I don't think this would stop the government.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Yes. It's a civil rights issue, it shouldn't be debated about, are you serious? Why is marriage necessarily between one man and one woman? What has made it that way? Religion? Religion has no place in influencing law. There is a separation of church and state for a reason. Do people realize that their precious bible doesn't even mention gay marriage anyway, and only brings up gays 3 times, with the verses' meanings being debatable? Try reading this, for anybody using their christian/jewish religion as part of their argument: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017293599_glickman21m.html?prmid=obinsource.  (i understand that not all people are christian, just taking the most used religious book for the religious argument)"we need to keep the sanctity of marriage"What sanctity of marriage are you talking about? That's absolute bullshit."how do I explain two men/two women getting married to my child?"I don't know, it's your fucking kid. Are you trying to refute the legalization of gay marriage because you can't take the 5 minutes to explain something to your kid?If civil rights don't convince you for some reason, I will tell you that gay marriage has economic benefits. Although I hate to use economic reasons for rights, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/16/opinion/16whitehead.html.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

The Supreme Court legalized Gay Marriage in 2015 as the law of the land.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

What definition of 'should' are we using? I don't think it is an obligation to legalize, otherwise it would have been done already. However, I don't think an argument can really be made anymore to prevent it's legalization.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

There is nothing new about gay marriage. The great Jewish philosopher Maimonides wrote nearly one thousand years ago the following statement:What did they do in Egypt (during the time of Moess)? A man would marry a man, or a woman two men.We are negating two thousand years of Judeo-Christian progress and this is not a good thing.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

You call that progress? Sure, take your tips from that book. By the way, you might wanna check the tag on your shirt. If it is (or if you've ever worn) a blend of more than one fabric, guess what? That's right! You've won an all expense paid trip to the fiery pits of hell! Ever eaten shellfish? What about pork? Congratulations, that wins you this fabulous prize as well!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

Even withing Judaism, Sodomy was always considered a far more serious offense than eating pork or shellfish. There is a hierarchy of sin and grace, always has been.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Yes, but we are not a Jewish nation, nor are we a Christian nation.We are the United States of America, a place where we should be free.Where all people are treated equal.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

I'll admit that, but tend to fear the future results (like the Kingdom of Anti-Christ USA).
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

The only thing to fear is fear itself.Have courage.I would never support anti-freedom of religion, but I also would never support "under god" in a national pledge.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

I would prefer a peaceful, tolerant theocracy with the Ten Commandments as the new US Constitution.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

You're insane.-That would cause a civil war.I would lead the charge proudly.FOR ODDDIINNNNNNLET THE NORSE RISE AGAIN. Or rather, may the Christians fall.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

Oh dear Pagan, I would grab my Sword of Jesus and slice your head off, put it on a pole and await the next foolish rebellion against the glorious Kingdom of God Almighty!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

So what you're saying is that some of the lord's commands are better than others?If you want to keep to biblical marriage standards, bad luck if you're a woman because guess what? You're the property of your husband, for him to do what he will with you! And if you don't want to, tough, he's allowed to beat you with a stick, as long as it is no thicker than his thumb of course!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

You mean the 'rule of thumb' legend. That has already been proven to be a lie anyway. The Bible does not allow for the beating of your wife, only the Koran does.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Yes, let us make a sacrifice instead.The rules on how to sacrifice are all in Leviticus.Who cares if it doesn't make sense, it's fun!!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

Yummy, let's make a new Temple somewhere in the Olympic Mountains of Washington and restart the good 'ole Divine barbaric barbecue once again. I love beef and lamb, but I hear goat is an acquired taste. They never actually ate the bird sacrifices and instead just let them burn, but lamb and beef was served to all complete with bread, wine, and possibly spices like salt and pepper too! They sang a lot of songs, chanted a lot of Psalms and prayers, and listened to Bible passages and preachers too. I hear sometimes the women would even dance, naughty.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

Oh yeah, for Christians it's just slaves and children you can beat. And the foolish.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

No it should not because same sex marriage is wrong! What don't you guys get that marriage is between one man and one women! You can't have sex with the person if your the same gender as your partner. You need a man and a women to reproduce and get more people in this world. You know why we have a lot of people today is because when God created Adam and Eve they reproduced and now everyone is here today. If there was Adam and Steve then after Adam and Steve died then there would be no one on this earth it would be over thats why God created man and women we can spread the population of this world!
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

No it should not because same sex marriage is wrong!Nothing is wrong if it doesn't result in some sort of harm to someone.What don't you guys get that marriage is between one man and one women!You say that as if only a man and a woman can love each other to the point of wishing a life-commitment. This argument is blatantly untrue, since homosexuals want to discard a life of promiscuity and make a life-commitment to another person, just like any heterosexual.You can't have sex with the person if your the same gender as your partner.You cannot have biologically designed sex, no, but you can have sexual acts with a partner of the same sex that are the emotional equivalent of biologically designed sex between a male and female.You need a man and a women to reproduce and get more people in this world.We have too many people in the world. This number will exponentially skyrocket once we conquer death. Gay people help to solve the overpopulation problem by just existing.You know why we have a lot of people today is because when God created Adam and Eve they reproduced and now everyone is here today.If you ask me, Adam and Eve didn't particularly need to make 6+ billion offspring. That's a bit too many, unless we find a way to live in the oceans and in space. Until we learn how to do these things, gay people slightly help solve overpopulation. In fact, gay people are probably an adaptation of evolution to stop overpopulation.That's right, I said it.Gay people are an evolutionary adaptation. They are natural and shouldn't be treated like second-class citizens for being different.If there was Adam and Steve then after Adam and Steve died then there would be no one on this earth it would be over thats why God created man and women we can spread the population of this world!Yes, and we succeeded in populating the world. We finished that mission. What does God want now? Does he really want us to keep creating more people so that our population grows so large that we cannot support half of it?I don't think your God wants us to suffer like that. Assuming he loves us like you say even though he condemns non-believers to Hell, even believers of a similar monotheistic deity as the Christian God.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: it should b elegalized

And I suppose that would mean Srom is supportive of incest? Because that would be the only way 6 billion people could arise from 2.
Debate: Same sex marriage sould be legalised
Side: people do not understand

And it harms children if they are brought into the equation.Death will never be conquered.....never. As I said.....they can't address the common cold and what cancer has ever found a cure. In fact more diseases and sicknesses are found all the time.To say that gays help the over population problem is hilarious. Please....they adopt and they hire women to have babies for them. Gay people are human beings......its the sex act that is ungodly. It has nothing to do with evolution. Your so concerned with the population......well hey your alive arent you? Your taking up space. Do you think they should just kill all the elderly and poor and sick and handicapped......?