azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

in 200 years from now, I won't be counting time like you are. I'll be in unending enjoyment of eternal life with Jesus who conquered death for all who trust in Him. God does not forget His people, He keeps them safe forever. I do believe that I will forget the names and faces of people in Hell........but then, maybe not. I will be forever changed, I won't look at things through the faults of my personality as I do now. I will see things as God sees them, clearly, and I will know as He knows me.What you are doing is devaluing your own life, making yourself equal to a worm and caring for yourself no more than you care for a worm. You equate your own death to the death of a worm, and then you try to tell me your way of looking at things is better than my way of looking at things according to God's word which implies you think you are better than me.We are not a superior species, we are made in the image of God and of more value than the animals. If you think you are equal to an animal and your death is equal to the death of a disease causing bacteria, your mind is twisted for destruction. Who did that to your mind?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Humans are classified as animals, and just because you have some imaginary destination to go to doesn't mean you won't be irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Relying on biblical talks invalidates your points, seeing as they are not a shared view.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

People who classify people as animals are dumb people, they are not dumb animals. Animals have more brains than that. .
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

"Someone doesn't agree with me, so therefore they're dumb" - Saintnow
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

awwwwww, do you want a hug? You are a very intelligent person with some dumb ideas. I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I'm not offended in any way. I'll just rephrase your sentence on yourself. You're an unintelligent person with some dumb ideas. Now go back to your safe space (your local church).
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

There there now. I really didn't mean to hurt your feelings. Try to cheer up....i know that's a a challenge for a person who believes they are equal to a worm, but God loves you and you can be happy about it. Try to find it.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Well now, I hope your pastor has enough Kleenex for you. Tissue for an issue?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Do you think being mean to me makes you more important than an amoeba?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

If this is considered mean, you really must take advantage of that holy safe space.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

I'm sure you could be much meaner. You are bitter and hateful, a deadly combination....and why not be that way when you believe you are negating yourself in death?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

...My bitter and hateful? Is English your first language?...
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I know English grammar, spelling, and punctuation well enough to know yours is poor with punctuation being your weakest point and I can easily point out dozens of your punctuation errors...but I have the grace to overlook them when I read as I place more importance on hearing what you are saying than on pointing out the flaws of your education...which seems to have dropped off before you got out of elementary school, judging by your ten year old grasp of usage of punctuation.I can point out all my own flaws as well....but if I look at your writing critically for grammar and punctuation, which I generally do not, I know my English grammar and composition skills far surpass yours. Anyways, I glad you feel better by nitpicking my writing.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Ahhh here's where you commented it. Feel free to go ahead and assess my writing, it won't make your own writing any more comprehensible.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

even with my dyslexic misuse of "your" when it should have been "you're" or "you are", you knew what I was saying and it was as comprehensible if it had been spelled correctly. How old are you? seriously? twelve?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

If you couldn't learn your first language properly what makes you think your opinion is worthwhile? I'm simply stating that your lack of linguistic skills ties to the fact that you're unintelligent. That's all.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

How old did you say you are? Twelve ?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

The funny thing is that I most likely had a better grasp on the English language when I was 12 than you currently do.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I rely on the truth. You cannot invalidate the truth. You invalidate yourself by insisting you are equal to disease causing bacteria. The truth is not a shared view between you and I simply because you don't want to believe the truth, it is a view which is either believed or not believed and can be shared. I know many people who share in the truth. Most people will not believe the truth, preferring lies by which they think they can be excused of their immoralities. Relying on your own talk when you do not rely on truth is self-deceptive.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I'm sorry but there is no qualitative or quantitative evidence of the bible, hell or heaven being truth. You can't prove it with any statement other than "but god says it is so!", and FYI, just because a large population believes in something does not make it true. There's 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, does that mean they're right because so many believe it to be true? No.A 2016 year old game of telephone is no different.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

I don't think I understand what you mean by 'telephone' in this context.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

a.k.a Chinese whispers
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

In grade school did you ever play the game "Telephone"?If not let me clarify...One person starts with an initial sentence, it is then passed on to another and so on and so forth. After multiple transfers of information, the starting information is often completely unrelated to the present information. Hence the term, a 2016 year old game of telephone. There was no proper Encyclopedia or fact checkers back in the days of Hebrew speaking humans, so no logical thinking person could believe that information could be passed on without alteration, especially over 2016 years when a class of school children can disfigure a message through just 10 transfers of knowledge.Someone could've put in a story of Jesus slaying a dragon if they wanted to and no one would have any way to validate the information apart from word of mouth, which is highly volatile in accuracy.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

So, you claim that all of it was actually unintentional? What purpose would it then serve? Because my view is that it is all intentional and meant for totalitarian administrative purposes.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

My point is that there is no logical way to validate any information in the bible, because it has been re-written and edited an infinite amount of times over thousands of years. People can modify it to suite their needs (in the olden days would've been things such as military expeditions and other things done "in the name of god". All this, on top of other scientifically proven faults in it.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Well, that explains why you call 'game of telephone' what I call 'obsolete administrative tool'. Compared to other religions, like Hinduism, that I can safely assume were created due to superstitions and later configured for administrative purposes, it has no value. The Bible, though, is contradictory with reality either way. Now that it can't really be edited, its followers are trying hard to stay centuries-outdated on the theories that invalidate it.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make here, explain further if you can.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Which part of it? I can explain either of the 3, but probably by tomorrow. I've something a bit more ambitious in mind than typing it all here each time it is needed, but it is night here and I'm rather tired. I'd still attempt a quick explanation.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

It is qualitative and quantifiable evidence of the veracity of the Bible when the Bible says the soul that sins shall surely die.You are a sinner and you are dying. How much quantifying and qualifying evidence do you want? You want to be in Hell where you can forever try to measure the heat and the amount of unending time? Will that be enough for you? It won't be enough, you can't get enough, you're asking for it and forever it will be given to you as you want it, a reality void of any "evidence" that God loves you. The only way you can get enough evidence is to believe the truth. God loves you. That's the truth.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I'm sorry but I think you need to take a course of evidence evaluation because you have no understanding of those terms (Qualitative & Quantitative). Please continue to make yourself look foolish though, it's quite funny.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I think you need to take a hike .
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I think you need to take a hike . .
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

The quality of your life is corruption which can be scientifically proven in the weakness of your body as well as the exposure of your immoralities. The quantity of your life is measured in time while you are dying, after which it is unending dying if you do not have eternal life.Why can't you figure that out for yourself? Are you to high up on your horse names "Pomp"? Typical evolutionist, reach a conclusion to prevent yourself from using your brain to try to understand things which at first mystify you.I'm sorry I described your life and dying as qualitative and quantitative. I didn't know your brain would short circuit so you could not understand what was being said.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

You call it "nihilism" is if coining a word makes it intelligent. I call it "stupidity" because it's dumb. The Bible says you are a fool. Whatever you want to believe, however you want to pretend you are intelligent, go for it and spend your whole life trying to prove you have the right to exist as a sinner outside of Hell.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

If you think a 2000 year old game of telephone insists I'm a fool, then it's clearly your inability to differ from logical sources of information and illogical hand me down, constantly reviewed, and rewritten sources of information which would qualify as "stupidity".Also using "Hell" as a deterrent for someone who thinks differently than you is a pointless argument because I don't believe it exists, and nor is there is proof it exists. So you're using your own irrational fears to validate your irrational opinions. Have fun in your safe space that is your local church though, I'm sure they enable your previously flawed opinions on life and existence to ensure you sleep tight at night.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

You're talking stupid. You should look in a mirror and see how stupid you look when you talk stupid. Seriously. Take your post here and recite it in front of a mirror as you watch your face....and see how stupid and/or evil you look while talking this way. Maybe it will help you to wake up and see you need to be saved from Hell.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

How do you know there's an afterlife? After death, no one has returned. Even Christ's account are dubious, and is there an afterlife for the common people? No, I think there isn't. When you die, you die. Thats all there is to it. Unfortunately people couldn't swallow this hard truth and thus religion and afterlife come in.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

There is either eternal dying or eternal living, there is no ambiguous "afterlife". One thing you know for sure, you are stuck in death and can't get yourself out of it and if God does not save you you will be lost....you are lost now, dying, and on your way to Hell. How you think you know more than God is proof of self-deception.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

The other argument is mine. This was submitted twice due to an error, so ignore the contents of this one. There is just oblivion. Anyone who wishes to prove otherwise is free to try proving how their version of heaven is true rather than some beer factory or Hades' Underworld without contradicting their own proof. And that's not my final argument, even then. (Doesn't really apply to the agnostics) You don't really have something divine inside you that is commanding your body. That's simply absurd. There is no longer much need to rely on false explanations from religious propaganda. As there is nothing divine inside you, there isn't anywhere you can go after death, since you will lose all your being and identity then.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

The only thing you said right here is that there is "nothing divine in you". This is true, you are a sinner, separated from God by your sin which makes you an enemy of his, devilish and not divine. You got that right....and the way you are going, you won't get proof of Heaven but you will get proof of Hell.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: Yes.

Well there certainly should be and any church that is preaching politics needs to have it's tax exempt status taken away.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Please do not take this the wrong way, but churches have the right to freedom of speech.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

You don't seem to understand how the law is supposed to work... churches get tax exempt status, that means they are not supposed to try to persuade their members to vote for one political party over the other... if they do they should loose their political status.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I am sorry. I just cannot agree to anything that restricts freedom of speech.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

Then fine! Lose your tax exempt status! You can't have it both ways.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

That is unconstitutional. The First Amendment gives the right to freedom of speech.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

Not if you're a church with tax exempt status! That is the law. Are you allowed to scream "fire" in a crowded theater? I guess you would say yes since you seem to have such a black and white perspective on the issue.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I disagree. Everyone has the right to freedom of speech whether we like it or not. Just chill out. No ad hominim, just debate. I guess we can agree to disagree.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I like you so I choose not to fight you. Can we please agree to disagree?
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Meh? I don't care? You're the one that brought it up.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Fair enough . :)
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

But the first amendment does not cover "tax exempt status"...that is another issue entirely
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

You have the right to your opinion .
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

It is not Opinion. It is constitutional law.Yes, the First guarantees freedom of speech, but the establishment clause also disentangles the church from the government. So: Church leaders should not be arrested for speaking how they feel about God. HOWEVER, if they do, they should not receive special treatment from the government since they should not have IN THE FIRST PLACE, according to the same amendment that guarantees their freedom of speech. So: they should pay taxes like the rest of us.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I am not going to change my mind about freedom of speech rights.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

You haven't addressed his argument. Please provide reasons and/or evidence for why he is wrong and you are right.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

The First Amendment gives people the right to freedom of speech.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

Revoking tax exempt status does not infringe upon anyone's freedom of speech. I do not have a tax exempt status, and yet I still have freedom of speech. Please address the argument.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I did, so stop telling me what to do .
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

No, you haven't. You have simply repeated you initial claim with regard to what other have said. No one here is saying that churches shouldn't have freedom of speech, and thus you are not addressing the main contention over tax exemption. I have yet to see you even mention tax exemption. Do you know what tax exemption means?
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Tax exempt means that people are not required to pay taxes. Everyone knows that.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Okay, now explain to me how paying taxes takes away ones right to freedom of speech.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

Look, we are not going to agree on this issue so give me a break.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Just answer the question. You cannot expect to join a debate site and then refuse to debate.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

I just admitted that I was was wrong. You should be happy .
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

Give me a chance please. Thank you in advance .
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

You DO NOT have to change your mind about freedom of speech rights. At all.In fact, I encourage you to have that opinion!But there is more to the First than just F.o.S. There is also the Establishment Clause. If the Government dismisses taxation on a group because of its religion, then that could be argued to be a violation of the establishment clause within the first amendment.There is a GOOD argument you could make against this, but you have failed to do so thus far.What I am saying is that if a preacher gets arrested for speaking about God, that would be wrong. It would violate the first amendment. But for a religious organization to not have to pay taxes ALSO VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

The government does not have the right to dictate freedom of speech for anyone.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

You are missing the point. Nobody is having their freedom of speech violated. Nobody is being arrested for speaking about God. The Government is not telling them they cannot speak about God. IN FACT: Places where God talk is the bread and butter DO NOT HAVE TO PAY TAXES! They are actually GETTING SPECIAL GOVERNMENT TREATMENT as they SPEAK ABOUT GOD! Which, according to the EXACT SAME FIRST AMENDMENT THAT PROMISES THEM FREEDOM OF SPEECH, they should not be receiving IN THE FIRST PLACE.This isn't about taking away their rights at all, it is about giving them the same rights as any other organization that does good deeds.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

You are wrong. Churches have the right to say anything that they want.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

And they still can, but they don't need public tax dollars to do it.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I am not going to change my mind, so stop trying .
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

I am not asking you to change your mind. I'm asking you to provide a argument which you still have not done. If you want to maintain an incorrect position, you can very well do that, but this is a debate website. Debate requires an argument. You so far have only made statements, not arguments.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I am waiting for this person to educate me about the Establishment Clause.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

Churches have the right to say anything that they want.Please show me where I have said anything to the contrary.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

I am done with debate. You have over and over again said that churches should lose their tax exempt status if they use their freedom of speech, and that is a violation of freedom of speech rights. I will not agree with you, so please stop trying. Have a nice day.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

So, then, you don't agree with the first amendment after all? I'm surprised.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Huh? What kind of ad hominim argument is that? You know that I support the First Amendment for everyone, even those that do not agree with me.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

This is not an ad hominem argument. Don't throw in philosophical terms just to attempt to make your statements seem more sophisticated. It is really embarrassing.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Calm down. It is not that big of a deal. LOL .
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

It is that big of a deal for me as a philosopher. If you think that this is a trivial matter, then it proves my claim that you have no background or understanding of philosophy.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

Yes it is. It was ad hominim when he falsely accused me of not caring about the First Amendment.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: yes.

It was ad hominim when he falsely accused me of not caring about the First Amendment.This is exactly not the definition of an argumentum ad hominem. A person only commits the ad hominem fallacy when he/she tries to invalidate a person's argument by attacking a person's character.In other words, an ad hominem would read something like, "Ismaila's words are false because she's an idiot." That is an ad hominem argument.
Debate: Is there really seperation of church and state?
Side: no.

You are wrong. That was an ad hominim argument .