azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

even TIME is divided by the knowledge of Him - A.D. and B.C.AD and BC didn't exist for hundreds of years after Jesus died. Russia didn't adopt the AD/BC system until 1918 (others were later). Some countries still do not use the Gregorian AD/BC - e.g.: Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, Nepal, Iran, Afghanistan.Jesus was likely born somewhere between 4 - 6 years before what we currently consider 1 A.D.All languages EAST of Jerusalem write Right to Left., All languages WEST of Jerusalem write Left to Right.False. ref refRe: bible codeSee here
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Again what does that have to do with anything. Is all of time names after Pharoah or Cesar or Mohammad? No! Jesus divides time just like in the Bible YHWH divides in the middle writing in both directions. With Jerusalem as a mid point! Do you think they made a deal with Assyria and other countries well West nations weren't even there, yet we have this in the TORH. And the curious shocking and equal in grandness is not only is language divided, in the same book that babel is told, coincidence? Then to have Jesus divide time for our dating. He who appoints our days our times our years, Jesus. And these three crazy coincident seem to confirm God!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Is all of time names after Pharoah or Cesar or Mohammad?Yes - The calendars for Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan are based on Mohammed; Nepal's is based on a legendary Hindu king.Many orthodox churches still use the Julian calendar to calculate dates for certain festivals like easter - the Julian calendar was implemented by Julius Caesar.The Gregorian calendar is only a slight modification from the Julian calendar.Before AD meant Anno Domini - it meant: Anno Diocletiani - and was named for a Roman emperor who killed Christians.People centuries after Jesus died guessed a wrong date for his incarnation and slightly modified the Roman based calendar that was already widely used, while Jews, Muslims and others still use different calendars - and this proves what again?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

YHWH divides in the middle writing in both directions. With Jerusalem as a mid point!First - write in discernable English, please.Second, if this is a reference to your earlier assertions: "All languages EAST of Jerusalem write Right to Left" and "All languages WEST of Jerusalem write Left to Right" - that is entirely made up (as I've already said.)
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

It is West and East. And like I said it is especially interesting they are all directional. I wouldn't be surprised if it were taken horizontal to find the same thing. Like I'm ready to see that, it would be double mind blowing!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

How is it interesting that some languages go from left to right, some go from right to left, some go both ways, some go from top to bottom, some go from bottom to top, some go around, and some have changed direction over time?That somehow is a sign??I wouldn't be surprised if it were taken horizontal to find the same thing.As I already said - there is no pattern here to see - not all countries write pointing toward Jerusalem - neither horizontally, nor vertically.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Months in the Gregorian calendar named after Roman/Greek gods and leaders:January, March, May, June, July, August, and possibly April.Months in the Gregorian calendar named after Judeo-Christian figures:None.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Yeah because that's equal to the whole world defining time and language by the known definer!So how many people know where AD and BC originated from? And can draw ref to having something to do with Jesus?And how many people can say March or April or any month and connect those to anything at all without googling them 1st ??Why doesn't your generation understand apples to apples.Is denial of truth that level militant for you all?God forbid you say hey, that's a pretty strong point for God's existence, not easily a coincidence.But no, you all have devoving fish brains!.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

And how many people can say March or April or any month and connect those to anything at all without googling them 1st ??So, ignorance is strength??
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

If people in the middle east base their calendars on Mohammed, does that make the Qur'an perfectly true?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So, AD and BC mean something amazing, but the months and days of the week referencing other gods and not mentioning Jesus at all means nothing?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I can go into any mall and ask anyone what AD and BC are, and have almost 100% tell me "something to do with Jesus"I can ask the same people what god Sunday or February are related to, and hear crickets!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So, the ignorance of people is the strength of your argument.Ignorance is strength - good job Orwell.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Wow, your beyond understanding, and your level of perception or discernment of information is dim.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Your point would have slightly more weight if you could form a sentence.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

A genetic mutation is deemed beneficial if it produces a physiological trait that enables the animal (or plant) to thrive and to produce offspring in its specific environment.All species have genetic mutations. You have some right now. So do I. The thing is we never know about them unless they cause a problem. And if they indeed are an advantage, in time they will be passed on and then "selected in" and will in time become the norm. As we will prevail over the less-fortunate members of our species who were not endowed with the advantageous physiological trait that the mutation produced.So...this is what we call Selective Inheritance. It is the driving force of Evolution. We "select" and then our off-spring "inherit" the mutations that are advantageous for living in their environment.Let me know if you have any more questions.Don't forget to look at that list of Transitional Fossils.SS
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Evolution is never seen, it cannot be scientifically studied. You are describing adaptations which are genetic changes triggered in response to changes in the environment, calling it "selective inheritance", and adding the huge leap of evolution which you strongly believe actually has happened and will continue to happen.The fossils you refer to as "transitional" are complete animals. To believe they were changing into different animals is something you can show only in cartoon animations. My guess is that some if not most of those "transitional fossils" are documented frauds anyways. I've seen the lists before, I did a college term paper on the one which was announced on an April 1st, I forget which year it was, but it was supposed to be a fish coming out of muddy waters turning into a reptile. It was taken seriously by evolutionist in spite of obviously being an April fools joke, and I've seen it referenced in lists of "transitional species" more than once. They predicted they would find the bones of the critter, then they went looking, and viola!!!! there it was!!!!! and it was phony!!!! but evolutionists bought it and still sell it.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

The results of evolution are seen everyday in every person.We call them vestigial traits.We also have museums filled with these,...........https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listoftransitional_fossils
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Those museums are like the guy who had that big circus, Barnum? Wrigley brohters and Barnum and Bailey Circus? Anyways, the guy was famous for saying "a sucker is born every minute", which was his guiding principal for drawing people in to his shows.Again, friend, you need to keep up with the latest science and see how those "vestigial" traits are being found purposeful and not leftover garbage as your teachers who were educated in biology but are not biologists continue to teach. Just google any of those vestigial things to see the latest findings on them, and if they haven't found anything new, they need to study it some more in REAL biological research, not in evolutionary proclamations of proof of evolution which ceases to study what is observed.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

How many times have I seen that stuff? Do you think if I look at it again I will believe it? Why would I want to believe in something which implies I am not me, but rather am a meaningless hologram produces by chemical reactions?It's the same stuff that was shoved in my face almost as far back as I can remember, like when I was five years old. There's nothing new in it, and why in the world people get paid for adding complications and charts trying to gain believers is amazing. Evolution is good for nothing except generating non-productive make-work for people who should have better things to do. I really don't know why you cling to it except for the tremendous peer pressure you face as you try to prepare for a career outside of the school..or inside the school like Dawkins
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

can you show us a "transitional" species which shows the change from a two chambered heart to a four chambered heart?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Trick question! But you cannot fool me.Such an evolution such as that of the primate heart would not show up in a fossil. And I think you know this. Internal organs and soft tissues are not fossile material. But we do have DNA evidence now. We can even explain how and when the thoracic changes occurred, and in what species. I have a nice video of this process as well. The thing about fossils in reality is the opposite if what religious zealots I like to think. Even though conditions have to be perfect for them to form, we have collected an abundance if transitional fossils. You have dozens of chances to see them on display if you would only try. We are actually surprised by how damn many fossils we have. I don't even know of any zealots who even try to play that card any longer, such is the preponderance of our fossil collection.Meanwhile......this is a nice article you might find to be of help in explaining the evolution of the heart.http://www.livescience.com/7877-understanding-heart-evolution.html
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

so the change happened so fast it could not be seen? And you believe it happened, so that's scientific proof?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I have seen videos showing the cartoon animations of animals morphing into different animals. I do not believe in evolution. You can't show me a video of evolution because you can't film it. You can only make cartoons depicting what you believe happened. I don't watch cartoons any more, but if I did it would be the old Bugs Bunny and Roadrunner show.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

they are not "transitional species", they are bones of individual animals. There is no need to believe in evolution to study any kind of science or application of science, and there is more and more science against evolution and the big bang as real scientists regardless of their beliefs look at nature scientifically and not trying to fit their findings into their beliefs. I have tried repeatedly to get you to look at these things but you won't. These things are pretty much forbidden in secular colleges, ignored by professors who hate scientific evidence which contradicts their belief in their religion of naturalism wherein they think they owe their lives to the universe rather than the Creator of the universe. ...who worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator who is blessed forever, neither were they thankful but became vain in their imaginations and their foolish hearts were darkened.. Somehow I still think you have enough of a desire for objective truth that you are better than Dawkins.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

they are not "transitional species", they are bones of individual animals.As opposed to?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

As opposed to your life, sin is keeping you away from God and if you are not reconciled with God, you will be cast away in the Lake of Fire
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

So the transitional species weren't ways of life..? Fucking brilliant. Your ability to spout incomprehensible nonsense is unparalleled.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

What makes you think you can defy God and remain outside of Hell?.................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Why do I even bother? You are incapable of staying on topic.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

YOU ARE ON YOUR WAY TO HELL......................................................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Interesting how there is no Hell anywhere in all of the Torah, no mention of it whatsoever. The Jews had no concept of hell whatsoever until they came into contact with the Greeks. In fact almost all of the early works just called it Hades. The term 'Hell' etymologically stems from the Germanic-Norse pagan underworld HEL, notice it has only one 'L'. In Norse Tradition Hel was not only the realm of departed souls, it was also the name of the Goddess who ruled over it. This Hel predated the Christian Hell by a few centuries. This borrowing of ideas and language is what social scientists call Cultural Diffusion.The concept of Hell is distinctly pagan in origin.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Why do you bother talking to me? All you have is dying, all your talk leads to death and I don't want it, you can keep it and enjoy it as much as possible
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Why do you bother talking to me?That's a good question.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Yes, so why don't you just go find out for yourself if you can live outside of Hell longer than you can breathe God's fresh air.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You have nothing to offer but death and you make a lot of stupid arguments supporting it and I'm not interested in your rotten ideas. Keep them in your own rotting body, that would be best, because you will receive extra punishments in Hell for teaching others that it's good to defy God.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I cannot offer you anything that will spare you from death, which is what you want. Death is inevitable. This is as hard a fact as there will ever be. Death is inevitable. That is the truth whether you like it or not. Death is the fate of everyone, that is not some arcane pontification in some old book, that is an everyday reality. It is undeniable. To deal with this discomforting fact you've grasped onto some ancient mythology, the dominant one of your culture as many others have to ease your anxieties. Which is well enough, if it makes you feel better, believe whatever you wish. But you have doubts, I can tell, which is why you are so insecure about it. If other people believe the same you would feel more confident about what you believe, but the trouble is that many people --intelligent people even -- don't believe. These people exacerbate your anxieties so you lash out at them.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I have a Savior, He has saved me, I'm going to heaven with my sins forgiven, I know He can save you but you prefer death so you can have it. Your just trying to waste my time. I'm not interested in what you offer. Keep it for yourself.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Numbers 16:32And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses, and all the men that appertained unto Korah, and all their goods. 33They, and all that appertained to them, went down alive into the pit, and the earth closed upon them: and they perished from among the congregationDeuteronomy 32:22 For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.Sounds to me like Hell is clear in the Torah. Why Jews would not believe in Hell I don't know. Why they don't believe Jesus is their Messiah I don't know. Why you believe you can be a sinner and live outside of Hell, I don't know....just wishful thinking.Keep on telling yourself that you can't possibly end up in Hell, then see where you end up. And keep in believing all the garbage you can find on the web that teaches there is no Hell and you don't need to be saved. Keep on believing death gets you out of reality so your sin does not matter. You're a fine Bob.......fools, both of you. See for yourself. I don't like your hateful attitude, you always sound bitter and nasty and I'm leaving you to learn the hard way if that's they only way you will learn. Liar liar pants are on fire, you don't have the right to live outside of Hell or you would not be dying now as you will be dying in the fire of Hell forever if you are not forgiven, not saved, not pardoned, not reconciled to God through the blood of His Son. I just shake my head in amazement wondering how people like you who are so foolish can think they are smart.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Deuteronomy 32:22For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.Sounds to me like Hell is clear in the Torah.In Hebrew the verse says SHEOL, not Hell. Sometimes the KJV translates Sheol as 'grave' and sometimes as 'Hell'. The Jews believed that EVERYONE goes to Sheol at death even the righteous, thus it cannot be considered synonymous with the Christian Hell, despite what deceptive translations might have you believe.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Even if you do change Hell to sheol in that passage, there's still a fire burning there from God's wrath implying sinner there will feel the heat of God's wrath, and that is Hell no matter if you call it Sheol or whatever. The words translate differently in English according to the context. There is one Hell, it's where you are going. Calling it "the Christian Hell" is wrong, it's the sinners Hell. You are not a Christian, there is no Christian Hell, there is only a sinners Hell for sinners.If you want to do a real Bible study on the doctrine of Hell, I can show you that the Bible throughout is consistent in teaching Hell is a literal place of fire where sinners remain forever except for when they are brought up to appear at the Judgement seat of Christ. The little twists of word play you are trying to pull, and are promoted by ALL religions including religions like Catholicism which is not Biblical Christianity, are not what the Bible teaches. You are getting bits and pieces of information from people who either do not believe the Bible or do not know the Bible so they twist things because they want to believe there is no Hell which literally fries sinners like eternal sausages.your false teaching, whoever you got it from, jumps to preconceived conclusions wanting to remove punishment of sin...the same thing you want to do with atheism.I'll say it once again, in plain simple logic; You are defying God, thinking you have the right to stand outside of Hell rejecting God's mercy and He has every right to leave you in the fire of Hell which you are literally asking for though ypu don't believe you can get it.....but you are wrong, your're going to get it, but it will be too late then to believe God cares and wants you to be saved.you know what? I'm not even going to try to teach you the Bible, you can find the stuff easily yourself if you quit looking only for garbage which tells you that there is no punishment in death. You're fooling yourself and it would be foolish for me to think I can talk you out of it. You want death, you love it, and it makes me sick. I have to leave you behind.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Even if you do change Hell to sheol in that passage, there's still a fire burning there from God's wrath implying sinner there will feel the heat of God's wrathNo, the verse states "...and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains". The earth is not consumed with fire. The verse is prophetic, it is saying This will happen someday. Sheol was a place that both righteous and unrighteous went upon death (Isaiah 38:10, Genesis 37:35, Job 14:13).
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

The righteous do not go into the fire. There is a reason "sheol" is interpreted as grave in one place and Hell in another. Heaven was not open to the righteous until the final sacrifice was mad by God Himself in the form of a man, the Lamb of God.Sin permeates all of creation, and it will be purged by fire. Its' the fire of God's wrath, the same fire which burns with brimstone in Hell. The righteous are not in Sheol now, they were never in fire in Sheol. They were in paradise awaiting the promise of God that He Himself would come pay for their sins with His own blood, and He came, and took them out of Sheol in His resurrection with the unrighteous remain in the fire of Sheol which is Hell.You are fighting against the concept of Hell for the same reason everybody else who is on there way to the fire fights against it....the simple reason that something inside you recognizes that Hell is God's justice against sin and you are afraid to admit your guilt, you are afraid to trust God, because you know that would mean siding with God against your own sin and confessing and forsaking your sin, your life would be different, and you are too chicken to trust God for that change....so you fight fight fight, making excuses for not repenting of your sin, telling yourself that death relieves you rather than punishes you, negating your own life in death and you will wake up in Hell and one day be hauled up to face the Judge who would have been your Savior, and you will be cast away into the Lake of Fire at the hands, I believe, of God's holy angels, and you will be where the devil and his fallen angels will be.........by your own words you will not believe God's provision for your forgiveness, for your salvation, so you will mock God and He will mock you when your calamity comes.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

ou're fooling yourself and it would be foolish for me to think I can talk you out of it. Erm..... you spend about 3 hours a day, every day without fail, trying to convince people you are right. What is different now? Ah.. its that they are asking you about the Bible. Something you have never even referenced during your 100s of hours spent "debating" on this site. More prove that you are not a Christian.