azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

i've presented several ideas... you just don't like them.what will we do when it asks us, "why am i here?"what will we say when it asks us, "are we god?"what will it do if it thinks we are going to turn it off?how will we control something that is smarter than us?how will we control something this is faster than us?how will we stop something that can reproduce itself?your only response to any of these hard questions seems to be "why would you ask that?"The only thing you mentioned was that we will turn off AI for asking "why am I here?". You claimed that this perceived threat of being turned off will trigger the inevitable war.I have no idea why you think you mentioned any of the other stuff in your list. Maybe you are participating in another debate about AI and have confused yourself?You are misinterpreting the "why" of my questions (even though I have explained this already). I am asking why would you turn it off for asking a question, not why would you ask that question. Maybe you should actually read my responses before ranting about the dangers of AI.You have yet to present a coherent argument for any of your claims.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

what will we do when it asks us, "why am i here?"you do not seem to grasp the import of such a question."why" is not something an algorithm wonders about, in general."i" is not how an algorithm refers to itself (in fact they wouldn't refer to themselves at all).so for a creation of our own making to ask what is arguably l the single most profound question our species has has EVER asked....hardly puts it into the category of just a question.its an existential question.and WE are going to provide the answer.HOW we answer, and what reaction it provokes is anyone's guess... but its not at all hard to visualize a scenario where it goes "badly" for us.its MUCH harder to visualize how it will turn out any other way.you are welcome to try.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

HOW we answer, and what reaction it provokes is anyone's guess... but its not at all hard to visualize a scenario where it goes "badly" for us.its MUCH harder to visualize how it will turn out any other way.you are welcome to try.This is purely your assumption. I don't see how an existential question will end badly.In fact, I think that it would be much harder to "visualize a scenario where it goes "badly" for us". Why would a superior intelligence suddenly decide to kill humans because we answered an existential question one way or another.By the way, if it were truly more intelligent, it would be able to figure out its creation purpose quite easily. I doubt it would need much validation on our part.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

I doubt it would need much validation on our part.is that what you are doing?that explains a lot actually.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

You need to type out the thoughts in your head.An exchange like the following makes no sense if you just keep the context in your head:me: I doubt it would need much validation on our part.you: is that what you are doing? that explains a lot actually.Are you suggesting I am an AI? A superior intelligence? Validating my own purpose through this debate?You need to practice communicating with people.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

I don't see how an existential question will end badly.do you know what an existential question is?ONE way that it ends, is the DEFINITION of "badly"... assuming, one wishes to continue existing.do you ever READ the things you write before you post them?just curious.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

do you know what an existential question is?ONE way that it ends, is the DEFINITION of "badly"... assuming, one wishes to continue existing.do you ever READ the things you write before you post them?just curious.Still making random claims without providing any explanation. I am not even asking for supporting evidence. I am just telling you to explain your personal reasoning behind a claim. You can't even do that...Why does asking an existential question lead to termination? You just claim it is "one way that it ends" without explaining why.This is probably the fourth time I have asked you to explain this exact claim. You still have not done it. Either you can't because you just believe it to be so, or you won't because you know it is based on faulty logic. There are also other possibilities, but if you don't explain your reasoning, we will never know.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

logically, an existential question can be answered in only one of two ways.... do you agree with this premise?if your very existence is at stake, would you not take a STRONG interest in the answer?would you not TRY to survive?would you not fight?of course you would.. and so will an AI who becomes aware of its own existence.should it even perceive that we intend to end its existence, then it follows that it will use whatever means it has available to it.as would you.i truly fail to understand how this is not self evident to you.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

logically, an existential question can be answered in only one of two ways.... do you agree with this premise?No. I do not see why the answer would be limited to two ways.if your very existence is at stake, would you not take a STRONG interest in the answer?A person can ask an existential question without putting that person's existence at stake.If the person's existence was at stake, he/she would probably not ask an existential question, but try to resolve the situation.should it even perceive that we intend to end its existence, then it follows that it will use whatever means it has available to it.as would you.Why would it assume itself immortal? If the AI was able to perceive the world around it, it would know that everything is fleeting including all the parts that make up its existence. I am not sure why a superior intelligence would be stupid enough to make the illogical conclusion of immortality.Humans deal with death all the time. Maybe you have not dealt with it personally, but most people understand that they cannot stop the inevitable.i truly fail to understand how this is not self evident to you.You have finally revealed the reasoning behind your claims. As you can see, I have raised some criticisms regarding your logic and assumptions.You do not understand because you believe your assumptions to be true. I have pointed out why they might be false.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

They predict that man and machine will combine. If they can keep my soul intact I would let myself be downloaded
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

Science is not able to create self aware robots. They never will, in my opinion.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

it will certainly happen in your lifetime... if its not already happened.the problem is we may not know about it until its too late.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

There is nothing to suggest that a Turing Complete AI is possible in the next 50 years, much less a fully sentient AI like in the movies.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

the fact that we have a name for it already speaks volumes.... and, if you are paying attention to nanotech, biomedicine, prosthetics tech, and psychology... there is PLENTY to suggest that it will happen sooner than later....for all we know it may have already happened.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

the fact that we have a name for it already speaks volumes....No it does not. We have a name for horses with horns too. Gods all have names too. How does a name speak volumes?if you are paying attention to nanotech, biomedicine, prosthetics tech, and psychology... there is PLENTY to suggest that it will happen sooner than later....for all we know it may have already happened.If we are talking about sentient AI, nanotech, "biomedicine", and prosthetics have nothing to do with the limits of a Turing Complete program.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

we have a name for horses... that's your argument?that we have already identified a test for AI and given it a name, means that we are aware of the possibility that we may need to apply that test at some point.that's how it speaks volumes.the blending of man/machine is one possible path. nano "goo" is another... we are devising ways in which swarms of individual "actors" on a molecular scale can accomplish things in the macro world where we dwell. have you seen "lucy" yet?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

we have a name for horses... that's your argument?A horse with a horn is a unicorn...that we have already identified a test for AI and given it a name, means that we are aware of the possibility that we may need to apply that test at some point.that's how it speaks volumes.It does not speak volumes about anything. The idea was proposed long before the invention of anything resembling the modern computer, much less AI.I think you might be confusing development of AI with general advancements in technology. Mechanical implants are advancements in another field. Nanotech is also separate.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

The idea was proposed long before the invention of anything resembling the modern computer, much less AI.so your position is that the Turing test had nothing to do with machines or digital computing? so your position is that it was NOT designed to tell if a machine can "think" like a human?have you even googled the Turing test?
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: Yes

Yes. It had nothing to do with digital computing. You can have an analog Turing complete machine.so your position is that it was NOT designed to tell if a machine can "think" like a human?The test was designed for this purpose. It still does not speak volumes to the progress of the actual field. There are a lot of tests for detecting cancer. There are not a lot of ways for curing cancer.have you even googled the Turing test?Considering I was the one to mention it to you while you were rambling about unrelated fields, I am probably more knowledgeable about it than you.
Debate: Should artificial intelligence(robots) be created?
Side: No

I think that we should strive to improve technology as much as we possibly can, but we should not create true (sentient) AIs. The button-box theory explains my position nicely.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Facebook is ok...I guess...If you want to give your information away and probably a stalker will stalk you for the rest of your life. Just kidding. It's just a good way of social bonding...Unless someone really is a stalker... :O
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

When faced with conflicting beliefs or ideas, cognitive dissonance can cause discomfort, leading individuals to ignore evidence that challenges their viewpoints https://barriersofcommunication.com/barriers-to-critical-thinking/.  This barrier inhibits open-mindedness and critical evaluation of information.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Yes, if you use is sparingly. If you are addicted and wasting all your time on it, then no. It's good if you use it... It helps you communicate with people in a different way and share things that you want people to know about. It is also a form of entertainment with Farmville, Fashion CIty... etc Just don't waste all your time on it ( like I used to)
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

I fully agree, it is a necessary social utility that helps us communicate more efficiently with our friends, family and coworkers, especially if you are far from your hometown. Facebook is a positive part of millions of people's lives and half of the users until they get addicted to it.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

If it is used for what it is supposed to be used for then yes Facebook is a benefit. However people seem to believe that Facebook is merely a place to play graphically poor games which help no person and are solely time eaters.I still use Facebook to its original use: being able to connect to fellow classmates and discuss anything from politics to the homework that is due the next day.So I will say that Facebook is good for people if they use it to the initial intended purpose; though many use it for reasons which are either questionable or extreme wastes of time.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Yeah I move around alot and I like too keep my friends. Especially during college times its very useful. Im going to the navy and you dont get much time on the phone, sooo facebook is nice.:)  Also I heard a story of a mother who lossed her kid and was kidnapped. The girl and the mother ended up finding eachother on facebook many years later.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Its good in moderation

aww that is a good stry i love you ( no freaky) i hope you have a good time fight ing and swimming and face booking and stuff:)
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

use skype it is mush safer and you can actually tallk to that person all around the world
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Exactly!. And when you are bored or enjoying college life with your friends people can always be talking about the same thing.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Facebook is a tool, so in essence, it can neither be good nor bad. However, I know more well adjusted users than I do hopeless addicts.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Yea it is a good thing , it fills the void in peoples personnel lives , it like wood filler .. fills th gaps in peoples live that have no life LOL
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

In the digital age that we are evolving in to, implementing social features into it is a great way to keep a good balance of both.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

I saw some professors at university to ask us to register facebook and to create a group so students and professors can participate in sharing experiences, posting articles and working as a team. I feel a sense of community and connected to each other. facebook can be used for education not only for personal social network.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

In some ways, Facebook is the only communication I have with some people.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

i think its goo because it oesnt have to be just for soliaclakuvj use u might just need it to contact family for importand things as paprtys jobs reuniuns
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

But if you think about it, that doesn't really make sense, now does it?
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Facebook is very good because it allows anyone to connect with anyone. After the launch of the Facebook many business professionals started to use it for their business work. If you share anything which is related to your business in the business it will automatically spread to millions of people in the Facebook. So it is also a kind of business advertisement.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Facebook is not good. It's an interesting site to get to know people around the world, listen to different stories, such as the news, or your favorite tv shows, even your favorite celebrity. What I am saying is facebook is not the most reliable thing in the world but its something you can go to, to know something or even get a hold of someone. Facebook is not a terrible sight it's just their to let you have fun and find new friends. Strangers? you ask ? Well thats the thing you think someone is trying to get close to you thats when you block them. It might be a free sight but it has its boundries when you want it too.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

It's useful for sharing photos and ideas, but I rarely use the chat- it's too fast.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Facebook is good cause u can keep in contact with old people and we're grown up we should know by know to be careful
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

Facebook is good because in Facebook you can chat with your friends that you have never seen her/him yet because you transfer a school or house.. but just don't waist your time using Facebook .. if your are still studying focus on your studies ... (like i use to)
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

yes it is absolutely the best tool out there for comm. in fact it should be free of chargebecause it is like necessity of life
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Its good in moderation

And yet humanity has survived for thousands of years without Facebook.....
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

its sucks so bad it should be baned just for sucking and it isn't just for makeing friends it can be used for planing parties or sleep overs
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

But if you think about it, that doesn't really make sense, now does it?
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

The whole idea is very good but there are many dangerous applications around Facebook. There are even scams and trollers and also hackers. I would recommend it to someone who is dummie to internet.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

The concept is great, but I hate its application. Swarms of randoms wanting to be friends with you, fucking Farmville spam, undeletable accounts. And no, please don't plaster my full name on every single thing I do or say online >.<
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

You can turn off the notifications through settings so u dont get spam
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

What happened to talking to people in real life?Facebook has its uses. I fucked a chick because she liked my profile pic (I never even added her hahaha slut). Viewing pictures of people and seeing what they're up to. That's about it. Literally. However the addiction caused HUGELY outweighs the benefits so all I can say is facebook is still for losers. I hit the 1000friend mark and deactivated my account because I never went on it unless I really had to.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

I know plenty of people who actually lead well adjusted lives and use facebook. Not everyone is affected the same way by it.Also, about the chick comment, please have some class.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Its good in moderation

no it's not people have become addicted to it ithink it is point less be cuz all you do is firnd out all da gosip and fb then call up your friend to get the story ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? why waste your time???????????????????????????????????????????????? but i gues like if you use it for what it was made for then it's ok
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

no, because people would post where they are and somebody would probaly rob thier house or something.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

I think Facebook is not good. From my point of view there are millions of very good reasons to stop using Facebook immediately. However many of the reasons stated below are not only valid for Facebook, but for other closed and centralized social networks as well, espcially Twitter.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: Yes, Facebook is good

From my point of viewWhat exactly is your point of view?there are millions of very good reasons to stop using Facebook immediatelyIf you named 10, I would be very impressed.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

Why do you need a facebook anyway? People say its a good way to keep in touch with friends. Well I can talk to my friend at school. I don't have a facebook because there is a lot of things that can happen like you can get addicted to it. Also you could talk to them on the phone. I bet most of the people on facebook are too busy "updating there status". I will get one maybe when I am older. In school a couple of weeks ago we did the Unplugged Challenge where you can't go on facebook, no texting, no playing video games online for 3 days. I did the assignment and that proved I am not addicted to any of those stuff I mentioned above.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

all your arguments dont tell why facebook is not good .Lisen I'M on facebook myself but I do think facebook can be very dangourous for cyber bullying(bullying on internet).And people also add eny one and then speak to people they dont now meet them and that is very dangerrous becaus that person could be a pervert that is manupulating you to abuse you this already happened and could happen to you to so if you put an argument put why you are against at least. So it isn't nesearaly bad but it is very dangerous.and no I will not put myself a point just to win I will leave other people do it so that it is fair
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

All those facebook games are fun to play but are full of viruses.the wores thing for your computer even if you have an anty virus
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

facebook is also very dangerous for a steal of indentity so be carefull
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

Hell no! Facebook is horrible. the idea of people being able to track you down and you just go ahead and do it anyway. That is just stupid
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

hell that is true that people can track you down and did you know that by face book people can also break into your computer and brake it from the inside with viruses my sister's frend can do it.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

Facebook is basically a way to centralize people's social interactions on the web. Many of its features can easily be provided by alternative methods(chat, e-mailing people, sharing photos on websites like photobucket or flickr), but it tries to unify them all into one website, making sure that every single detail that could be used to identify and track someone is easy to access and encouraged (tagging people in photos, posting events you're going to, sharing personal photos, sharing personal information on people's walls...). For so many years, the stance towards the internet has been caution and not sharing information you don't want to be out there for everyone to see, for a very good reason: personal information is very valuable, both for advertisers who can make money out of it by tracking you, and for identity thieves or creepers who basically live in the golden age of their respective "hobbies". Facebook encourages putting yourself out there, and sharing as much information as you can, just for that ridiculous notion of "social acceptance". It's basically the greatest way to profile as much people as possible, and there's absolutely nothing preventing the company or, say, the government, from accessing that info and using it for... or against you.
Debate: Is Facebook good for people?
Side: No, Facebook isn't good

Its not that FAcebook is bad , but it has caused some harassment issues , and stalker issues in the past .I hateFacebook , but I have one anyway ....