azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

what benefit does anything have? Why say "if it doesn't benefit, it shouldn't be legal"? That is not what it says in the first amendment and it surely isn't the subject of this topic. The subject remains: Does viewing it hurt anyone?
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

I find irrational thinking distasteful . Your making assumptions.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

No pyg it is not about the making of it But i guess as a victim of child porn i have no right to say people viewing this shit isnt hurtful ?Yes pyg i understand that it isnt hurtful to the people viewing it.Thats probably because they are peodophiles and this shit is their on-screen eye candy.How sweet. NOTI am sorry but they dont give people a certificate to say they have been used in kiddy porn.Sorry i dont even have an oscar to show for it.So i guess as far as cuntfacekinda goes , i should go wiki myself an intelligent education.Then , do you think i might have a justified reason to offer proof ?Then will i have the right to say that it is hurtful.? There have another go........
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

The viewing of it itself hurts no one. That is exactly what my point is. If someone views it, no one is hurt.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

So you are saying that you advocate the viewing of child porn?oh , ok , pyggy .
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

I don't advocate many things that I think should be legal. Never the less, people have their rights.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

So , you DO advocate watching child porn.........!!!oh ok pyggy!
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

I don't ADVOCATE it. Just how I don't advocate shooting yourself up with a shit load of Heroin. But if someone wants to, they have a right. None of my business.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

"But if someone wants to, they have a right. None of my business." SAYS THE PYG!SO YOU DO ADVOCATE IT THEN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oh ok pyg!!!!!
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

I dont know where my last post went ! maybe it got deleted . DID someone take offence ?I dont understand why an American site would delete it , freedom of speech and all that shit.The following is similar to what it said !TO pyg!Those people who chose to inject heroin HAVE the right to fuck themselves as much as they want.To use this as an example to say that childporn doesnt hurt anyone is a pathetic copout excuse to advocate the viewing of child porn! I dont know why YOU feel threatened by this response pyg ,you pig!
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Hey, did you know that to advocate, as defined by Princeton's dictionary, means to "recommend: push for something; "The travel agent recommended strongly that we not travel on Thanksgiving Day""?I could fight for freedom of speech for everyone, including the KKK, without, in any way, advocating racism. Pygs could fight for a pedophile's right to look at child porn without, in any way, advocating child porn. I'll bet you didn't know that.Not promoting the legalization of the viewing of child porn, fyi. Just making sure you know what "advocate" means.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Whatever copout excuse you would like .  w/e Im over this debate. done , caputt ,capiche w/e .
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

I dont understand why an American site would delete it , freedom of speech and all that shit.The following is similar to what it said !The 1st Amendment ,Freedom of to express oneself, is about what the government cannot do to the people. Private school teachers can decide if kids can yell out whatever they like, cunt, fuck, bitch, etc.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

YES!!!!!!!! VIEWING CHILD PORNIS WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOW UPON SAYING THAT, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT THERE IS MOCK CHILDPORN ALSO.THIS IS WHERE ADULTS WHO STILL LOOK LIKE KIDS MAKE MOCK CHILD PORN MOVIES. DESPITE ALL THE PEOPLE STARRING IN THIS TYPE OF PORN ,ARE ADULTS OF CONSENT , I STILL FIND IT WRONG, IN FACT , THOSE ADULTS ,THAT STAR IN THOSE TYPE OF PORN ,ARE ADVOCATING CHILDPORN AS OK. WHEN IT CLEARY IS NOT OK! (OK KINDA YOU VILE THING, ARE YOU GONNA DOWNVOTE THIS TOO , FUKING LOSER!)
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

You're not getting the topic. They're not asking if viewing it is wrong or not, but whether it hurts someone.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Dear David , i understand what is being asked. And as i stated ,yes it does hurt that people watch kiddy porn,it hurts me . You see , i am a victim of kiddy porn , them viewing it , hurts me. You and pyggy can alter the essence as much as you like but the answer is still yes .
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

A lot of things hurt me also. The way people have been prejudice against me and others taking advantage of me. I'm not a person of vengeance but I also don't care to see myself a victim .In doing so I victimize myself.Can you imagine a court based on being offended by others. Nothing is perfect .Life is a bitch, so what. That's life. I chose to see today and of tomorrow... and not of my past.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Talking in caps doesn't get your point across any more than talking normally. It is like when people clap their hands to every words that they say, it doesn't get their point across, it just gets people annoyed with you.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Wow ! Come in Houston !100 DAYS OR SO LATE FOR THE DEBATE.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Yes, I am of the opinion that the viewing, and the eventual obsession that may follow, of child pornography is evil. Looking at it may not matter much, but many people desire it after seeing it, that is when it gets wrong and, if only for that reason, should be banned.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

viewing it won't create an obsession. The obsession already exists and is not in anyway ignited by viewing child pornography.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Are you a paedophile? Do you know for a fact that it won't cause damage?
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

If you are to claim that something causes damage, you must first prove that it does.Just how when someone claims that the tooth fairy exists, they need to prove that she does. I don't need to provide evidence against her existence because I'm not the one making the claim.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Does it cause psychological damage when a child is raped? If society didn't push the issue, depending on age, the victim would possibly forget. Also, I am not specifically stating that the viewing of child pornography is the sole cause of paedophilia, but it is possible that it is a factor in the end result: child rape/molestation. Every paedophile is different. Also, if nobody looked at child pornography, there would be no need to make it which, in the end, would save the child who's picture is being taken. I recall an episode of Law & Order: SVU in which a paedophile would look at images of adult pornography edited to make it look like a child. What do you think of that if such a thing exists?
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

the fact is, people watch it whether it's illegal or not. At least if it were legal it would be a lot easier to track down the people who actually make it.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Why are you a pedophile , Besides you spelling is atrocious.It can cause damage if the one viewing the child porn was to molest a childbut in most cases this is not so or it can't be proven that one did not molest a child before ever viewing the porn. Lets speak of the most hidden form of child sexual abuse.Incest . Lets make it hotter ,lets speak of the 500 average children killed by a natural parent .Where are you to take issue of those facts. Stranger danger is extremely rare. So get your facts straight. AND don't discuss your opinion .Discuss real facts.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

That is an average of 500 children killed a year by a natural parent.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

I well look past the part were it causes them to rape children, even though i strongly disagree, I well be arguing about the topic at hand. I say yes because it may(or may not), make the child's self esteem, lower. I'm guessing that most of the children don't know what there doing. When they grow up it 'well come back to haunt them' and they well regret ever doing that. It's a common thing to look at how it effects the one who is seeing it, over the one who is showing it. So lets realize that the child is most likely going to feel insecure about themselves as their life takes it's course.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

The viewing is harmful to the stibility of the mind. If you take pleasure in viewing the dehumanizing of a child, you're fucking sick. There is a chance that the people viewing it are doing it to another child, and the child that it is done to repeats it. It is a fact that molestation is a domino affect. If you are molested you are twice as likely to repeat it, it's like saying that a child that views his mother getting beat and raped by their own father takes nothing from it. That is the talk of the stupid, heartless, ignorant, and perverted. This shouldn't be a fucking debate.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

wait... are you saying that the child should be arrested for seeing his mom get beaten?you know what, your argument is flawed on so many levels.If people are choosing to view child pornography, they are already into kiddie porn. No one watches child pornography and THEN decides to fuck kids. That's like saying Porn will make someone want to fuck. I think natural selection is enough to say that humans just want to fuck and porn is the result of that.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Duh, that's what i was saying. For pedophiles to view child pornography is just adding gasoline to their fire. and i wasn't talking about regular porn (prostitutes on camera) but about children that haid no choice in the matter, not people that know better.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

and to disagree with you on the child getting arrested for wathching his mother get beaten. That was not what i was talking about, i'm saying that if a child sees their mother beaten, will they take nothing from it? will it not take from them the innocent view they once had of the world, and they might repeat the abuse.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

The debate is on the voluntary viewing of child pornography being illegal. It is not about the effects that a young child who views it will be on.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

viewing child pornography is disgusting! what kind of person in their right mind would want to look at it in the first place.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

A pedophile.Then again, their minds aren't exactly "right."Question: Is it paedophile or pedophile? I've always thought it was the latter, but I may be wrong.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

It's pedo which comes from the greek word pedo meaning child. and Phile (which by all rights has no place in meaning to fuck something because most uses of the word refer to a great fondness of something. For example Thermophile and negrophile.) which means (greek meaning) brotherly lover.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

...................................................Consumption encourages production....................................................
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Hey if you think child porn is disgusting well what's your preference? There's old person porn, dead person porn, transexual porn, animal porn, milf porn, hairy men, muscle men, twink, bisexual and the list goes on. There would be no harm in making child porn legal. (I think were talkin' sex scenes with minors). I say consensual sex is good sex. So as long as no one is raped everything is legal.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

I will say yes, that viewing child pornography is harmful. If a pedophile starts viewing such pictures or videos (I hope there is no videos) the main person behind those pictures or videos WILL START MAKING MORE. And the making of these pictures or whatever hurts children. Think about it. Why do think there are many books to the Harry Potter series....Because there are viewers who read them. So yes, on a small scale, viewing is not harmful. But on a huge scale, yes it is. And if at any perspective if it is harmful, then we as humans beings must put a stop to it. Also, these pictures or videos will make their addiction even worse. Think about it (history repeats itself), when people start to smoke one cigarrete, their addiction slowly increases. Soon they will start smoking more. And soon they will crack and find others ways to recieve that high: They might steal, rob; PERFORM A CRIME. Porn addicts masterbate ten times a day. Gross. And they realize that they have to stop their addiction AFTER they have masterbated. THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT ADDICTS IN GENERAL WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET THAT SATISFACTION. I will never shun anybody for who they are, even child molesters or wife beaters. But that does not mean i support them. (closing statement :))
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Well, actual porn addicts tend to prefer porn over sex.But if actual videos of child pornography are no longer illegal, it would be easier to track them and find the person who made it, who is an actual criminal.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Well, there are types of porn. Sex porn and visual (pictures) porn. So i do have to stand by to this argument that porn is sex. I have watched celebrity rehab about porn addicts. And believe they needed help because mainly they were unhappy. And they were having sex six times a day and still they were unhappy. Now, they were not child molesters. But what if they were? I bet they will hurt children to recieve satisfaction. But at the end of the day, these addicts come to the realization that they will have to stop. And the reason why i say that is because their realization is too late. The children are already hurt, scarred, and dead.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

This is remarkably naive to posit that viewing of child pornography doesn't hurt anyone. It is naive, and contrary to the evidence. Do you think that companies from the beginning till now have spent BILLIONS in marketing research, and then BILLIONS in marketing because the conclusion was negative. To view these children on the web has the same effect as advertisement. Argue with it if you want, but companies have spent billions in research, and maybe trillions in advertisements since the beginning. They have decades of research by professionals, you have your opinion.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Your talking by your own opinion based on your emotions and that of opinionated assumptions.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

Watching child pornography would cause the "cliche" emotional damage to the victim(s) and the child's peers would bully them to no end. Child porn is immoral in many religions (I do acknowledge it's accepted in many as well) anyway. If watching child pornography was legalized that would only influence more people to create it and our prisons would be overflowing with screwed up perverts. Anyone who says it should be legalized as far as I care is interested in such things and would willingly force innocent children into sexual favors and abuse for their own sick joys if they could get away with it/it was legal. Just my measly opinion.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Your opinions are assumptions. assumptions don't make it so.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

think about why those videos get posted in the first place, to make money, your viewership has made those people money and now, those people will make more of it.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

There is just so much I could say here. Especially being someone who spent years of their life trying to forget about what happened to me when I was younger. As far as the whole "it's a safe outlet for them" thing... no. Those people don't get better by watching their fantasies happen. It just gives them more ideas and makes them want more things. Honestly, all violent porn that encourages men to be mean, rude, or cruel to children and those who are weaker (physically or emotionally) than them shouldn't be allowed to exist. Instead of going into all this further, I will just show you something about porn that has a direct relation to this topic and is extremely important to this. Here's the article: http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9437/ I believe that this article should be required reading in every high school sexual education class. People really need to understand the effects of viewing explicit material (violent, sexual, or both). For the people in that article, it leads to loneliness and maybe to mistrust, but for sexual predators it can lead to a decreased sensitivity about the feelings of others, making it easier for them to target children and not feel much guilt over it. No one should ever watch child pornography because they're promoting that industry and directly hurting those children. It's the same as doing that to the the child themselves. So, yes. Viewing child pornography is always bad: It's bad when people promote that industry - which directly helps the practice of trafficking to continue - and it's even worse to allow a pedophile, who is obviously at the greatest risk of wanting to enact these things, to watch it (and gather more horrible ideas while becoming even more callous about any victim's or possible victim's feelings).
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

It hurts the children whom are involved and molested for the act of unhumanness known as child pornography. It also hurts those who could of stopped it, but were unable or didn't.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

If our federal government sees no wrong in the FBI distributing most of the child pornand you see it's alright for them to do so.I'm not sure why people are jailed for viewing it.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

Just because people are angered or disgusted by the viewing cp.Logic uses no emotion , but only sees the facts for what they are. And that's all the facts ,and not of their opinions.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

Sigh you sick twisted liberals.......I know you don't have consciences. I know you've had an easy life. I know you haven't seen the other side of the fence. I know you want to end the world as we see it. But can't you do it without wanting to physically fuck kids?
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

I am a kid. Thanks very much. I don't view it, it's wrong. I was simply just saying that strictly keeping to the exact question "Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?" it doesn't. Depending on the viewer, it can though. But usually the viewer, is a paedophile. (N)
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: yes

I wasn't talking to or about you. It was directed at PYG.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

Woooooooah, there. Watch the broad, sweeping judgements. Factually speaking, Liberals tend to support science more than Conservatives. Science just makes sense. I've always liked logical things. I'm a Liberal. I do not under any circumstances whatsoever think that child porn is acceptable. I firmly believe that it should be completely obliterated from this earth for all eternity. In fact, I would rather see the entire species be killed in payment for these crimes than see one more story of some disgusting pedophile attack a child after years of sitting around in his house jerking off to child pornography and getting more ideas in his mind. ...Then again, I wouldn't mind if they just did away with porn all together, so maybe I'm not a fair judge of what they should do with porn. But it would give people more time to do important things with their lives rather than wasting their time or procrastinating. Anyway, don't just assume that it's Liberals are the cause of all the problems with child pornography. It might feel like a relief to blame something specific that you don't like (such as a political party) but life really isn't that simple.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

NOW, now..CAN'T WE DO WITHOUT THE ASSUMPIONS...Most of us were were taught to be embarrassed of our own nakedness. You have been vary well conditioned to believe as you believe.Such irrationality ..comes with that.So take a good dose of religion and judge others but not yourself.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

The viewing hurts children, because by viewing it, you are showing support for this monstrosity!
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

On the contrary, not all child porn involves real children therefore your argument is bias and cannot hold ground. Kids do not know when one views such material therefore is blissfully unaware when, where or how the viewing took place. Therefore, it is there imagination that hurts them in the end and not the one doing the viewing.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

Now this person is logical. But the fact of the children being molested may hurt them is real.Not all cases are the same as others insist on. But if one does not pay for the images and the do not distribute them, how do they contribute by looking at them. At the best to be said, they are disrespecting these children. But it's the FBI that not only posses the CP but as well distributing these images promotes the viewing of them, thus these images are contaminated evidence by those who pretend to help these children. The FBI could have closed these P2P sites, but instead they were apart of the distributionof this porn since the year 2003. A fact not well known.