Debate: Do you accept evolution?
Side: No

THE BIG BANG THEORY:Theorizes that a large quantity of NOTHINGNESS decided to pack tightly together, ----and EXPLODE outward into hydrogen and helium. This gas is said to have flowed outward through frictionless space ("frictionless ", so the outflowing gas cannot stop or slow down) to eventually form stars, galaxies, planets, and moons. According to this theory, in the beginning, there was no matter, just nothingness. Then this nothingness condensed by gravity into a single, tiny spot; and it decided to explode! This produced protons, neutrons, and electrons which flowed outward at incredible speed throughout empty space; for there was no other matter in the universe.As these protons, neutrons, and electrons hurled themselves outward at supersonic speed, they are said to have formed themselves into typical atomic structures of mutually orbiting hydrogen and helium atoms. Gradually, the outward-racing atoms are said to have begun circling one another, producing gas clouds which then pushed together into stars. These first stars only contained lighter elements (hydrogen and helium). Then all of the stars repeatedly exploded. It took at least two explosions of each star to produce our heavier elements. Gamow describe it like this "In violation of physical law, emptiness fled from the vacuum of space and rushed into a superdense core, that had a density of 10 94 gm/cm2 and a temperature in exess of 10/39 degrees absolute. (That is a lot of heat for a gigantic pile of nothingness, especially when it is impossible for nothing to get hot).This theory stands in clear violation of physical laws, celestial mechanics, and common sense. Here are a number of scientific reasons why the BIG BANG THEORY is unworkable and fallacious. 1. Nothingness can not pack together2. a Vacuum has no density3. There would be no ignition to explode nothingness4. How do you expand what isn't there.5. Nothingness cannot produce heat6. The anti-matter would have destroyed all the regular matter.Now lets look at the outward pushing particles1. There is no way to unite the particles. As the particles rush outward from the central explosion, tehy would keep getting farther apart.2. Outer space is frictionless, and there would be no way to slow the particles. 3. The particles would maintain the same vector (speed and direction) forever. They could not get together and begin circling one another.4. No way to change the direction of even one particleNow look at the gases (lets imagine the particles could get together)1. Gas molecules in outer space are widely separated2. Neither hydrogen nor helium in outer space would clump togetherLook at "Push themselves into stars"1. Because gas in outer space does not clump, the gas could not build enough mutual gravity to bring it together2. Careful analysis has revealed that there is not enough matter in gas clouds to produce stars3. There would not be enough time for the gas to reach the currently know expanse of the universe, so it could form itself into stars.4. Gas clouds in outer space to not contract.We could go on and on. This information came from "The evolution handbook" by Vance Ferrellthis book has over 3,000 facts which annihilate evolutionary theory