azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Meat is Murder!
Side: Yes, I agree

Well, first, soy is not a good example, because soy is a complete protein. Indeed you could replace the crop entirely with soy to yield a greater amount of protein. The only problem with soy is that it may have health complications, the research isn't clear.Second, you're assuming the two crops would contain no amino acid overlap. This is most likely not the case. A more real world example would look something like this:Crop A:100% Amino Acid 130% Amino Acid 2Crop B:30% Amino Acid 1100% Amino Acid 2So you could end up with a greater than 50% protein yield by combining crops. You'd have to know the exact amino acid quantities of each possible crop to come up with an optimal combination.Third, the crops would have additional health benefits aside from just the protein: high fiber, low fat, vitamins, etc.Fourth... ok, I'll stop now.
Debate: Meat is Murder!
Side: No, I disagree

No no no. You should butt out of other peoples choice of diet, instead of telling them what they should be eating to satisfy your own personal sensibilities. Or do you just like to boss other people around? Bossy boss. Bully. I call you out. We all laugh at you for trying to boss other people around. Its sooo funny too. Look! Look! Now he is telling someone he should eat vegetables, that they should put vegetables in their mouths! Ahahahaha. He thinks he is the boss of what people should put in their mouths. Ahahahahaha. Fool.
Debate: Meat is Murder!
Side: No, I disagree

Amen brother, Halleluuuuujaaaaahhhh!!!Say it again brother. Oh lord. Oh lord. Oh lordi lord.You just can't say no to chicken nuggets. There ain't no vegetable that's finger licking good. Mmmhmm. Praise the lord. Pass the dippin sauce.
Debate: Meat is Murder!
Side: No, I disagree

It does for SOME ppl and you have to be considerate of those ppl too.You don't think so? Then what about the Eskimos? The Eskimos or Inuit as they call themselves lived exclusively off animal diet like seals, walrus, and birds with zero vegetables. That is because they had no vegetables at their climate. They needed to live that way to survive. If they tried to be vegetarians, they would die of starvation. Of course, today they have access to white man's food, and don't have to eat just meat anymore. Now they die of diabetes and alcoholism.Meat a convenient and natural way to get that protein and it tastes good, not like those vanilla flavored protein shakes where they have to add vanilla to it because without vanilla it would taste so bad that people would never consume the stuff, let alone get near it.But we both know that is beside the point, and that meat is not murder, but that murder is murder and meat is meat. Murder is immoral, while meat is just part of life. Anyone who says otherwise is most likely just a hypocrite who goes to Micki-D's and orders a big mac supersized with a large coke and side of fries, and 6 piece chicken nuggets, or just orders off the dollar menu. You know what I'm talking about.
Debate: Meat is Murder!
Side: Yes, I agree

Of course meat is murder. Murder is the act of killing. So killing an animal is murder. Humans naturally startted out as vegatatian and out of there greed they became meat eaters. Think about it a human is basically defensless, it can't startout by killing an animal. But over time Humans developed wheapons and applied tem in the wrong areas. Eating meat is hurting the planet. A cow only retains 10% of the food intake so if a cow where to eat 13,000 pounds of wheat only 1,300 would remain. Instead of giving the cow that food and having 90% of it being wasted, give it to humans and stop hunger. And when I say 1,300 retains, only 10 percent of that is edible. But greed aside and save humanity we are smart. Even through many indians might be in poverty and over populated that country has a surplus in produce since 80% of that country is vegitarian.
Debate: Meat is Murder!
Side: Yes, I agree

And meat goes off so quickly, so so much is wasted. Alot of meat is chucked because of fear of bacterial diseases.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

I purposely made this debate that vague so that it could allow more discussion on different levels. So pick on what ever area you feel like because it doesn't really matter to me. [:
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

Yup, indeed. All the point of views and comments were came out from many different categories of people with those experiences. There are no exact answer for "Are men and women equal?" because for certain fields; they still need women to handle and for selected work fields there must be men to take part in. So, different peoples have different mindset and point of views. There are useless to make any argues in here... NO DISCRIMINATION at here, just mine point of views... Thanks, you guys did really helped me a lot for creating an ideas for the topic of "ARE MEN AND WOMEN EQUAL?" =)
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Please clarify debate

This debate needs a bit of clarification because there are some obvious areas where men & women are not equal (i.e. reproductive capability, physical strength, etc), however, there are other areas that could spur a great debate. For instance, are men & women equal in these 4 areas?- Economic independence- Reconciliation of private and professional life- Equal representation in decision-making- Gender stereotypes
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

Are they the treated equally? Well I don't think so at all, man I could through out a list of 100 reasons why we aren't equal!
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

YES!! when a women can be strong enuf to defend hrself during any misbehaves, when she can fight against any evil, she can also be equal to men.. ders nthng different tat men do.. wat dey cn do cn be done by women too!! women is equally successful to men.. and if nt in any MNC's, den at deir places.. think a day widout yur mom or wife??? one is nthng widout a women!! As the saying goes" Behind every successful men ders a women!!"
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

A woman does not have to be physically strong to be equal to a man. I'm sorry, but you need to fix your grammar and your spelling. It kind of makes your post hard to read.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

From my point of view nowadays if you are a straight, white, male, not a drugaddict or alcoholic, if you have a nice job and do not have aids - you are the most discriminated person ever. I mean come on there are organisations that fight for women's rights. For gay's rights. For black's rights. For everyone's rights except for normal guys) I think we should really start bothering about majority rights being discriminated.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

"From my point of view nowadays if you are a straight, white, male, not a drug addict or alcoholic, if you have a nice job and do not have aids - you are the most discriminated person ever."Ahahahhahahha. I'm sorry, I just aahahahhahah. Alright I think I have a hold of it now, wait ahahahhahahhah. Okay, okay. That's better. Did you really just say that? I don't think you understand what discrimination is. "According to General Accountability Office (GAO) Report GAO-04-35, the weekly earnings of full-time working women were about three-fourths of men's during 2001. The report was prepared from a study of the earnings history of over 9,300 Americans for the last 18 years.Even accounting for factors such as occupation, industry, race, marital status and job tenure, reports the GAO, working women today earn an average of 80 cents for every dollar earned by their male counterparts. This pay gap has persisted for the past two decades, remaining relatively consistent from 1983-2000."Discrimination is being treated worse because of sex/race/sexual orientation/religion etc.You are just complaining because you don't have many organizations that fight for your rights because straight, white, males kind of already have their rights. These other organizations exist to help others combat the oppression that we as straight, white, males have been forcing upon everyone else. You have nothing to complain about. When we get pulled over by a police officer, we just worry about trying to get out of our ticket, not getting beaten. When we walk around at night, we don't have to be afraid of being raped. We don't have our right to marry the person we love being assaulted by religious fanatics. Statistically we are healthier, have more access to education, and come from high socioeconomic backgrounds. And you're complaining that other people have organized to try help disadvantaged peoples like themselves to have equal opportunities to live happy, productive lives?I have dealt with people like you before and in my experience, they were motivated by thinly veiled racism and sexism.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

"You are just complaining because you don't have many organizations that fight for your rights because straight, white, males kind of already have their rights. These other organizations exist to help others combat the oppression that we as straight, white, males have been forcing upon everyone else."HAHAHHA! Straight white males barely have any rights, you don't oppress anyone either, you can't do shit. ou need to stop listening to the white feminist women.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

the only sexism left is against men and against fathers. thats why fathers lose their kids , their homes and life savings in 80% of divorces...thats why men die 5 years younger in every nation on earth and thats why men commit suicide at 4 times the rate fo women and no one cares, especially not women
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

Your argument is full of logical fallacies, and is sexist. Yes, I would say the same thing if you favored women over men. Patriarchy and feminism are both sexist because they value one biological sex over another. Egalitarians make the most sense. They believe in equality.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

It's true, and I'm in the same boat. And it's not right. But if it were needed desperately enough, there would be a group out there advocating just those rights. Despite some pretty silly affirmative action type dealings here and there, we've had it pretty good.Make sure everyone's equal by promoting the rights of EVERYBODY and yours won't disappear. You shouldn't have to apologize for things that your great grandfather was a part of, as you're not guilty of anything (as far as I'm aware). But anyone who's holding on to old dogma needs to be educated, so these groups are important.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

The reason there is no straight white man's rights movement is because you already have all the rights. Is anyone denying you the right to marry who you want? Is anyone trying to remove your bodily autonomy? Was there ever a point in American history when you would have been a slave? Who are all the politicians, the business owners, the filmmakers and authors and artists, the richest people in the world? Straight, white men. I think there are some ridiculous expectations out there for men, including what it means to 'be a man'. But while life can be hard for everyone, including straight, white men, people realize you have it pretty much as good as it gets.Edit: I don't mean to minimize the hardships that any individual person faces, because I don't live your life and I don't know your particular circumstances. I just mean that white men have had most of the money, power, and influence for a very long time.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

Straight white males are the most discriminated people on earth, they barely have rights ,trust me. Stop reading that white feminist woman bullshit and open your eyes. Whites need a rights movement more then anyone.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

"Straight white males are the most discriminated people on earth,.."Is that why white males have the easiest time getting a job, graduating high school and getting accepted to a university, getting fair wages, still hold the vast, vast majority of positions of power in the government and corporations, and are overrepresented as characters in every form of media?I empathize with the frustration that comes to people born into a position of privilege without having asked for it. Whites and especially white men might feel like they are being blamed for things that they personally had nothing to do with and that can lead to a feeling of resentment. Yes, sexism, racism, and discrimination hurts everyone involved, including men, whites, and heterosexuals.But to claim that straight white males are the most discriminated against out of all the people on earth is shockingly ignorant. In other countries, women are still property, ethnic cleansing is overtly or covertly sanctioned by the government, and homosexuality is still punishable by law, sometimes even by death. All the statistics disagree with you, as, I'm sure, do the personal experiences of almost any marginalized person you might make that statement to. If you are going to make a claim like that, I hope you have more to back you up than some insults and saying 'trust me'. http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~rgibson/RACESTAT.htm http://www.urbanministry.org/wiki/sexism-and-gender-discrimination-statistics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

I am so cunfuzzeled. Are you telling me that normal people are neglected. I am neglected because I am not a man and I am not white nor am I an drug addict or alcoholic. So please revise.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

To PassingBy, I see where you are coming from, in regards to the normal person being the most discriminated person ever. It does seem, to a degree, that normal is not normal anymore. My question to you is this.......what is normal? When you use what you wrote in your article, you are saying that being "a straight, white, male, not a drugaddict or alcoholic, if you have a nice job and do not have aids", you are normal. What if I am "a straight, [black], male, not a drugaddict or alcoholic, if [I] have a nice job and do not have aids"? Am I normal? I will assume that you are not being racist in your statement, although you may come across as such. I will make an attempt to define, from my point of view, what normal is. Normality is defined by each person (as an individual), their environment, and any other influence on their lives. This obviously means that each individuals' ideal of normality differs from one person to the next (with a sprinkle of similarity). Each persons' circumstances are different, as well as each persons' environment will be different at several levels. There are places in this world where women cannot even show their natural facial beauty because of culture and tradition. On the flip side, there are places in the world where women can breast feed their children in public. What is normal, no matter where you are, is that men and women have certain roles in their perspective societies. This does not make them any better or worse, it only makes them more important in the global scheme of things. "Normality is relative" [a quote by nerve_gs (not yet a member of this site, but a co-worker)]. Much respect!
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal Rights

In a perfect world there woulbe be no debate o nthis one. We are equal unless we for some reason think we are ebtter the nsomeone else which is selfish and totally wrong.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

With the latest social standing that we are I would like to believe that a man and woman is equal now in every single phase. Woman have fight for their equality right for the recent years and believe that they have already acquired it. They have proven themselves in every single way that they can also do the same things man could. Even surpassing some qualities at some point. Now I don't want to argue about if woman is more better than man.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equality Won't happen

Indeed. They have proven themselves, now they (for lack of a better word) complain about compensation for their equality. My point is that all forms of arguing in favour of one or the other is ridiculous.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

So are you implying that women should become more agresive than men and some how force men into treating women the same?do you think that men will let women push them around?Your points are probable but it seems as if you are proposing violence, u will ruin the hard work already put in by women such as E. caddy stanton or susan B.anthonyif not women in our society (US) are taking their rights for granted considering women in othre parts of the world
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equality Won't happen

In your first two sentences, you present a great case. Usually, the perception of the use of force causes one to intensify their feelings and defend their position more than previously needed.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

Humans are simply bodies, both are equal at birth, however its the way we are trained. If you say women are weaker, its your fault that women claim to not be as strong. Anybody who works out is going to be strong. Women are taught to be in the home, and to be what you would call feminine (feminine and masculine are both mindsets, they dont truly exist.) women do have the potential to be just as strong as men because it all depends on the way they are raised. It takes alot for a woman to become a body builder, but then again, it takes just as much for a man to become a body builder.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

equal as in value? in that case I agree a new-born baby boy is just as valuable as a new-born baby girl.equal as in the same? No Gender is a massive part of who we are and there are attributes and characteristics which are more likely to occur in one then the other such as muscles, given no training has occurred a man is more likely to develop larger muscles than a woman due to biology- male cavemen hunted and so the males who developed muscles the quickest/greatest lived however female cavewomen didn't hunt as often as men did and so muscles were only a hindrance due to costing more food/energy hence women who evolved to be lighter/thinner had a better chance of survival, this is also why the strongest male in the world is more often than not stronger than the strongest female however the overlap between the genders is massive due to life style choices, dieting, genetics, etc.Potential- definitely women have the potential to be as physically strong as a man if they chose to however most don't.to be fair modern society has made our lives so much easier than physical strength is no longer a necessary nor necessarily a desired trait hence with each passing day the genders are becoming physically equals in terms of strength.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

From my point of view nowadays if you are a straight, white, male, not a drugaddict or alcoholic, if you have a nice job and do not have aids - you are the most discriminated person ever.I mean come on there are organisations that fight for women's rights. For gay's rights. For black's rights. For everyone's rights except for normal guys) I think we should really start bothering about majority rights being discriminated.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

I think that it all depends on the situation. Take for example, there are jobs that women dominated while others men dominated with characteristics of a job. But, sometimes we find some jobs that women can do a job better than men, while other is the same situation with men doing better for women. In village council, I would say as a woman point a view, women don't have a voice in it. Although women are fighting to have a title for village council, it is not always possible all the time. Most of the time their is no equal opportunity for women because it all depends on what we want.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

i think what is ....men and women are the same because the men or the husbands work outside and have tensions and women work inside houses and they have the same tensions that men have they only diffrence is men go out 2 work and women stay back at home to work ....! got it !!
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

Womens must not treated equally as Men because they are not mentaly or physically strong as men.In the hell of working they forget their responsablities.There ego will increase.And causes more problems in life and in the future of their children.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

Well men and women have equal rights they should compete against each other because many women are also physically strong as men. Since so many female athletes are a master on the sport they should get challenged. Such as Lindsay Von who wanted to get challenged by to compete with men in the same sport. Lindsay Von is a professional and if she wants to get challenged a great challenge to her is to compete against men so both genders competing against each other is a great idea for those female athletes who want a challenge. So yes men and women should compete against each other in the same sport.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Not

Men and women have equal economic rights true however id argue women have superior legal and social rights than men (at least in the western world)physical men are advantaged due to basic biology men develop physical strength easier than women as this was a desired trait for men for thousands of years whereas women throughout history are often taken care of by men and never really needed strength hence women are generally light and skinny due to not needing excess weight they do not need.because of this the general man is stronger than the general woman and the strongest man is more often than not stronger than the strongest woman even though overlap is massive this tilts sports very slightly in favour of men which is why sports requiring physically labouring work is segregated for fairness as well as a victory is actually valued if men competed against women every time the man won it would be called unfair because he's a guy and every-time the guy los he would be mocked for being beaten by a girl
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

You're queer unless you like nas car h h h h hh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h hh hh h h h h h h h h h h h h h hh h h h h
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

gawdammit chip i will beat your ass, murica, wumin r gud 4 3 fingz
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal

It should not be a matter of debate as man & woman are complementary to each other.You can not even imagine the existence of one without another.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Equal Rights

I think that Men and Women are basically equal. I do believe that women do earn less than men on average and that this is probably at least in part due to sexism. In this current age women are becoming just as educated as men. If they do not want to work for less under the club of men than they are just as smart and just as legally able to create their own businesses. It is unlikely that people will refuse to use a service or product provided by a female owned business, especially if the product or service is better.Woman have every legal right to take charge and dominate in business and careers. If anyone chooses to be an employee instead of an employer you have do deal with some jerk employer regardless of your gender, race or whatever else. Now the fact that more women aren't entrepreneurs and business owners is a personal choice and will probably change in the near future. Women have the same level of education as men now it is their job to learn how to use it to their advantage.Just because women have equal rights doesn't mean they will have instant economic and social equality that is a long slow evolving process you can spark with your own self-improvement.
Debate: Men vs. Women
Side: Actually

Actually, there are more women entrepreneurs than men! And a good part of the reason for this is that women who have the skills don't feel they fit in in big business, or don't find the support/flexibility that they deserve there. The problem with this is that big business is losing out on 50% of the talent pool by not being a welcoming environment to women.