azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

God... died and resurrectedDarwin...died...There are many evidences showing Gods power and loveScience i son our sideSo Science is nut helping youDo you really think that a big fire ball just exploded and there was the earth?So... the next time we see a big bang we should be happy because we are getting another world!
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Which law of thermodynamics, exactly? There are four. And no, not one contradicts the BB.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

So..humans evolved from....what, monkeys? Well, where did the monkeys come from? Cells? There is no combination of chemicals of cells of any kind to create life.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Haeckel's drawings were faked by Haeckel himself in order to help Darwin out with his theory. His faked drawings helped prove that human, fish, and bird embryos evolved from each other.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If the theory of evolution was true, we should have discovered millions upon millions of transitional fossils that show the development of one species into another species. Instead, we have zero.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

When Charles Darwin came up with his theory, he admitted that no transitional forms had been found at that time, but he believed that huge numbers certainly existed and would eventually be discovered…“Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

We didn't have the digging methods we have today. All of the transitional fossils he said would need to exist have been found side his death.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Even some of the most famous evolutionists in the world acknowledge the complete absence of transitional fossils in the fossil record. For example, Dr. Colin Patterson, former senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History and author of “Evolution” once wrote the following…“I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them …. I will lay it on the line – there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Stephen Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University, once wrote the following about the lack of transitional forms…“The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

" It is gradualism we should reject, not Darwinism."Gould didn't like the idea of gradual change, he was perfectly fine with evolution.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Evolutionist Stephen M. Stanley of Johns Hopkins University has also commented on the stunning lack of transitional forms in the fossil record…“In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If “evolution” was happening right now, there would be millions of creatures out there with partially developed features and organs. But instead there are none.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If the theory of evolution was true, we should not see a sudden explosion of fully formed complex life in the fossil record. Instead, that is precisely what we find.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Paleontologist Mark Czarnecki, an evolutionist, once commented on the fact that complex life appears very suddenly in the fossil record…“A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth’s geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin’s hypothetical intermediate variants – instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

The sudden appearance of complex life in the fossil record is so undeniable that even Richard Dawkins has been forced to admit it…“It is as though they [fossils] were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists. Both schools of thought (Punctuationists and Gradualists) despise so-called scientific creationists equally, and both agree that the major gaps are real, that they are true imperfections in the fossil record. The only alternative explanation of the sudden appearance of so many complex animal types in the Cambrian era is divine creation and both reject this alternative.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Nobody has ever observed macroevolution take place in the laboratory or in nature. In other words, nobody has ever observed one kind of creature turn into another kind of creature. The entire theory of evolution is based on blind faith.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Evolutionist Jeffrey Schwartz, a professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, openly admits that “the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Even evolutionist Stephen J. Gould of Harvard University has admitted that the record shows that species do not change. The following is how he put it during a lecture at Hobart & William Smith College…“Every paleontologist knows that most species don’t change. That’s bothersome….brings terrible distress. ….They may get a little bigger or bumpier but they remain the same species and that’s not due to imperfection and gaps but stasis. And yet this remarkable stasis has generally been ignored as no data. If they don’t change, its not evolution so you don’t talk about it.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Anyone that believes that the theory of evolution has “scientific origins” is fooling themselves. It is actually a deeply pagan religious philosophy that can be traced back for thousands of years.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Can you provide a source that describes evolution from the year 1000?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Anything that we dig up that is supposedly more than 250,000 years old should have absolutely no radiocarbon in it whatsoever. But instead, we find it in everything that we dig up – even dinosaur bones. This is clear evidence that the “millions of years” theory is simply a bunch of nonsense…It’s long been known that radiocarbon (which should disappear in only a few tens of thousands of years at the most) keeps popping up reliably in samples (like coal, oil, gas, etc.) which are supposed to be ‘millions of years’ old. For instance, CMI has over the years commissioned and funded the radiocarbon testing of a number of wood samples from ‘old’ sites (e.g. with Jurassic fossils, inside Triassic sandstone, burnt by Tertiary basalt) and these were published (by then staff geologist Dr Andrew Snelling) in Creation magazine and Journal of Creation. In each case, with contamination eliminated, the result has been in the thousands of years, i.e. C-14 was present when it ‘shouldn’t have been’. These results encouraged the rest of the RATE team to investigate C-14 further, building on the literature reviews of creationist M.D. Dr Paul Giem.In another very important paper presented at this year’s ICC, scientists from the RATE group summarized the pertinent facts and presented further experimental data. The bottom line is that virtually all biological specimens, no matter how ‘old’ they are supposed to be, show measurable C-14 levels. This effectively limits the age of all buried biota to less than (at most) 250,000 years.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

The odds of even a single sell “assembling itself” by chance are so low that they aren’t even worth talking about. The following is an excerpt from Jonathan Gray’s book entitled “The Forbidden Secret“…Even the simplest cell you can conceive of would require no less than 100,000 DNA base pairs and a minimum of about 10,000 amino acids, to form the essential protein chain. Not to mention the other things that would also be necessary for the first cell.Bear in mind that every single base pair in the DNA chain has to have the same molecular orientation (“left-hand” or “right hand”)? As well as that, virtually all the amino acids must have the opposite orientation. And every one must be without error.“Now,” explained Larry, “to randomly obtain those correct orientations, do you know your chances? It would be 1 chance in 2110,000, or 1 chance in 1033,113!“To put it another way, if you attempted a trillion, trillion, trillion combinations every second for 15 billion years, the odds you would achieve all the correct orientations would still only be one chance in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion … and the trillions would continue 2755 times!“It would be like winning more than 4700 state lotteries in a row with a single ticket purchased for each. In other words…impossible.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

How did life learn to reproduce itself? This is a question that evolutionists do not have an answer for.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

In 2007, fishermen caught a very rare creature known as a Coelacanth. Evolutionists originally told us that this “living fossil” had gone extinct 70 million years ago. It turns out that they were only off by 70 million years.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

According to evolutionists, the Ancient Greenling Damselfly last showed up in the fossil record about 300 million years ago. But it still exists today. So why hasn’t it evolved at all over the time frame?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Darwinists believe that the human brain developed without the assistance of any designer. This is so laughable it is amazing that there are any people out there that still believe this stuff. The truth is that the human brain is amazingly complex. The following is how a PBS documentary described the complexity of the human brain: “It contains over 100 billion cells, each with over 50,000 neuron connections to other brain cells.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

The following is how one evolutionist pessimistically assessed the lack of evidence for the evolution of humanity…“Even with DNA sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Perhaps the most famous fossil in the history of the theory of evolution, “Piltdown Man”, turned out to be a giant hoax.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If the neutron were not about 1.001 times the mass of the proton, all protons would have decayed into neutrons or all neutrons would have decayed into protons, and therefore life would not be possible. How can we account for this?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If gravity was stronger or weaker by the slimmest of margins, then life sustaining stars like the sun could not exist. This would also make life impossible. How can we account for this?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Why did evolutionist Dr. Lyall Watson make the following statement?…“The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Apes and humans are very different genetically. As DarwinConspiracy.com explains, “the human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the chimpanzee Y chromosome and the chromosome structures are not at all similar.”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

How can we explain the creation of new information that is required for one animal to turn into another animal? No evolutionary process has ever been shown to be able to create new biological information. One scientist described the incredible amount of new information that would be required to transform microbes into men this way…“The key issue is the type of change required — to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content, from over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of even the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism to three billion ‘letters’ (stored in each human cell nucleus).”
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Evolutionists would have us believe that there are nice, neat fossil layers with older fossils being found in the deepest layers and newer fossils being found in the newest layers. This simply is not true at all…The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced (“younger” and “older” layers found in repeating sequences). “Out of place” fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Evolutionists believe that the ancestors of birds developed hollow bones over thousands of generations so that they would eventually be light enough to fly. This makes absolutely no sense and is beyond ridiculous.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If dinosaurs really are tens of millions of years old, why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them? The following is from an NBC News report about one of these discoveries…For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70 million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Which evolved first: blood, the heart, or the blood vessels for the blood to travel through?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If evolution is not a person distribute special ways to any species. That's adaptive. I am saying in the basic animal .If the ability to have conscience judgement exists in 1 species, since evolution is not a person distributing these abilities then there MUST be other animals with conscience judgement! Unless evolution is intelligent and is a person, how do all these qualities reside in ONLY ONE species?How does that make sense and if it does, then tell me how and why??
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Evolution is incorrect. Christianity is correct. That's all I have to say for now.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Monkeys are Evolution's most plentiful resource. They think that they are right, when in reality they use arguments without base and real supports.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Prove to me that any person, place, or thing, can exist, without Yahweh Creator God...............................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Prove to me that any person, place, or thing, can exist, without Yahweh Creator God...Hi Dana. Here you go:-One can't prove that God doesn't exist. But science makes God unnecessary.https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/stephen-hawking-science-makes-god-unnecessary/story?id=11571150 God is not necessary to explain any person, place or thing according to Stephen Hawking, who was until his recent death one of the top scientists on the planet, and had an estimated IQ of 160.Or we could deduct 100 points from that and listen to you instead. Which do you suppose we should do dear?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

No darling. You have no prooof, that the existance of material matter is inherently possible, without a Creator, God. Soething, cannot come from nothing.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

No darling. You have no prooofWhy did you even ask me if you were just going to ignore it? The Earth's most senior scientist said that God isn't necessary to explain the universe and that's good enough for me you thoroughly insane idiot.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Soething, cannot come from nothing.Listen up, you intellectually redundant troglodyte bitch. Firstly, yes something can come from nothing. It happens all the time in quantum physics. Particles just pop into (and out of) existence without any help from anybody.Secondly, you have zero evidence that there ever was nothing in the first place. You are making up your own facts because that's what fucking idiots do.Thirdly, even if it were true that there was nothing, and that something cannot come from nothing, that still has absolutely fuck all to do with your invisible friend Jesus. Please get help you mad girl.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Not bitch, but Miss Bitch. No something cannot, come from nothing. That is like saying butterflies, shit unicorns, out of thier assholes, on Mars.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

No something cannot, come from nothing.Dana, all conversation with you is pointless because whenever anybody tries to educate you about things you are completely ignorant about, you stick your fingers in your ears and just keep repeating whatever it was you were ignorant about.Your stupidity is your own fault, not mine. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-virtual-particles-rea/
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

U wukk not stop you, from leaving me, alone. The choice, is yours...................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

U wukk not stop you, from leaving me, alone. The choice, is yoursLook you crazy bitch: you're arguing with my posts on a public debate site. If you want people to leave you alone then you're in the wrong place. Stop trying to weaponize victimhood you horrible woman.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

I'm giving you options, nothing more, and nothing less..............................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

I don't believe, I'm a victim. I stopped believing, I'm a victim several years ago, when Yeshua had me let go of the past, and trust Him. If you want to know what I believe, you are free, to ask questions.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

I don't believe, I'm a victim.That's a lie. Everything you write on this website is designed to make yourself into a victim. You tell everybody you meet that you're a rape victim. You send abusive messages and then demand apologies. You argue with people and then beg them to leave you alone when they argue back. You threaten civil lawsuits every time somebody disagrees with you.I believe you're very confused and in a lot of ways you think like a child does. You want your own way and simply pick what you see as the best way of facilitating that. Victimhood is obviously something which has worked for you in the past, and that's why you use it as a weapon against others.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

You are a liar, and this conversation, is over. Goodbye..............................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Bruh moment...................................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

In fact, if there was nothing, like you say, then where the fuck did your invisible friend Jesus come from in the first place? Your own pseudo-logic literally contradicts itself.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

If God is God, and He is, why does He need a reason, cause, or explaination, when Abraham Lincoln, does not?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

If God is God, and He is, why does He need a reason, cause, or explainationBecause you began by telling us something can't come from nothing, then told us God came from nothing you fucking retard.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

I'm actually not fuvking at the moment, try again, old chap.............................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

I agree..............................................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Me too................................................................................
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Evidence for Evolution: Biology, Genetics, Comparative Anatomy, Comparative Embryology, Fossils, Bio geography, and Geology. Evidence for Creation: A storybook
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Darwin's writings are storybooks because they are pure fiction. They are based on assumptions.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Darwin even wrote himself if a cell is more complicated than he thought it would be, then his theory would break down.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Just like the lysosomes in a cell! Praise God! He is the Creator!
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Not only storybooks, but pure literature too! the Bible is true!
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

If Darwin's writings are storybooks, what does that say about the Bible?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Notice how the parent argument did not use "Darwin's writings".
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

All of the "evidences for evolution" are all facts. They are fair game. Christians believe that genetics and all that sciency stuff is true too. There is no evidence coming out from all the sciency facts that supports evolution.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Is that so? What is your view of the law of superposition?
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Evidence for Creation: Biology, Genetics, Comparative Anatomy, Comparative Embryology, Fossils, Bio geography, and Geology. Evidence for Evolution: Assumptions
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

And why would one try to counter this evidence? Look at yourself. Monkey? No! Human? Yes!
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

Incidentally enough, polls have found that support for evolutionary Theory is most highly concentrated in these fields. Formal education in biology carries a negative association with belief in Creationism, that is to say, the more educated in biology a person is the less likely they are to accept the creationist view. This ought be no surprise as biology, and paleontology has often been the forefront of evolutionary thought.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Evolution

With today's telescopes and other instruments NOT designed or "created" by a god, we can SEE worlds being created AND destroyed. There has been no sign of a sky god lurking in the area, as yet. I don't ever expect to hear about one.
Debate: Creation vs Evolution
Side: Creation

Seeing is not believing, my friend! Do you see the wind? No! Do you see dust in the air when there's sun in you eyes? No! Do you see your Maker? No! In the same way, you have been blinded by the radiance of truth! Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ!---1 Peter 1:3