azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Online shopping Vs Physical shopping
Side: Online shopping

Hey. Innovation is the source of progress, and companies like Davison Inventions play a key role in driving this process. Offering a comprehensive array of services, expertise, and resources, they have helped bridge the gap between ideas and execution, leaving an indelible mark on the world of invention. Over the years of the company's existence, thousands of clients have used their services, and davison inventions reviews indicate that many inventors managed to bring their ideas to life and achieve recognition.
Debate: Online shopping Vs Physical shopping
Side: Physical shopping

Clothing, shoes and perfumes sucks at being shopped online because the costumer cannot test the size and quality. Online shopping maybe convenient but conveniency has its limits
Debate: Online shopping Vs Physical shopping
Side: Physical shopping

First it is necessary to move, and during shopping lost calories. Second, once you know how you sit on one or another thing.
Debate: Online shopping Vs Physical shopping
Side: Physical shopping

i usually mess up even when i go for physical shopping, buying tees a size bigger, or pants a size smaller, i'd go crazy if i went for online shopping. plus, it is always more fun going around on the escalators and through the racks of clothes and bookshelfs and toys and accessories :D
Debate: Online shopping Vs Physical shopping
Side: Physical shopping

We can believe the products because we look and afford it.
Debate: Online shopping Vs Physical shopping
Side: Physical shopping

I thought that physical Shopping are better because we feel something change out of our daily routine and this is good, and we feel mentally something different.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

In a way. There are a number of strategies that target "needs" and there are even products that we literally need to live, maybe not that specific product, but we need water for instance and purchasing water in a bottle, or a water filter, is an option.As for "artificial needs," take home security. Commercials quite consistently choose the tactic of "if you are a woman with a daughter you will die if you don't buy this" and so an artificial need. You may or may not die with or without that product, but when that tactic works it is because it has created an artificial need. If you are talking about a strong want though, you are exaggerating the the intentional impact of a commercial or ad, and conflating the product's ad with the reaction it creates. If a commercial for a specific purse for instance, creates a buzz and a bunch of people are like "I need that purse" it is not the same as the home security example because though the reaction of some may be akin to that of fulfilling a "need," those who want the product do know they don't actually need the product, and that's not even the intent of the ad. Usually those types of ads are purposely appealing to things like status and fitting in--which in the human animal can be just as powerful a strategy.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Yes, as I see, lots of things in our world are already made for artificial purposes. TV is one of them. People dont use TV as their past time before, and yet, someone invented the TV. The shampoo and beauty products, yeah, it also promotes artificial needs. Back then, people dont use that because they know that using plant and natural supplies are helpful. Mostly, things in our world now are created and advertised for artificial purposes.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Yes it(advertising) does plays an important role, since in our day-to-day life we were so busy that we hardly aware of those thing which are happening around us. So reading headlines get to aware of those thing in which advertisement of products also comes.rug pad
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Thats the whole point of marketing. They want the message to get through your head and sit there until you buy their product. I don't see ads that say "Buy you basic needs first". Most businesses could care less. Doritos wouldn't mind if you ate their food every single day. Thats just more money in their pocket and their strategy apperently worked.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Yes I agree the advertising create artificial needs, advertisement has become a vital instrument in attracting consumers. Very often consumers get carried away with the advertisements and buy products which they might have otherwise not required.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Yes, it certainly does. 50 years ago, computers did not exist in the mainstream public.Now, you are expected to own one, and also a cellphone. If you don't own one, you are seen as unusual. It's expected to own and watch TV and other things like that too. You are just expected to buy and own these advanced machines.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

What has the expectations of others, to do with your needs?
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

What do you mean? Irregardless of whether or not I need it, one DOES feel a desire to be accepted by society.No matter what sort of "need" one has, you do feel pressure like everyone else, and the pressure to own a computer or cell-phone is very strong. That is the artificial need.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

If I expect you to own a ferrari, does that create a need for you to own a ferrari?Does having gadgets make you more accepted by society?Do you really want to belong to a society that does not accept you unless you own these gadgets?Desire and need are different.Is revealing the existence of a thing (advertizing) the same as forcing you to want that thing?
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

No, because not everyone owns ferraris. BUT, nearly everyone does own a computer or cellphone and use a facebook. A few don't, but that is uncommon. It is just socially expected to own this sort of device.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Yes. There is a chemistry to life. Chemistry is predictable. Like stimuli and reaction. Humans like shiny things and symmetrical things. Studies are done to find out what humans react to. This information is used to stimulate the "impulse buy." Entire sciences are based on stimulating people's impulse buy. For example: Coupons are designed stimuli the "gambler" in us to think that we "winning money." People develop addictions to coupon shopping and buy stuff they don't need because it's a good deal..There many subconscious stimuli's used to. For example, the sexy model on the shampoo, water images cause a subconscious sexual attraction. Stores are set up so when you walk it, symbols that cause hunger are seen. Red stimulates hunger, so you see the apples and tomatoes when you go into the Giant. Studies have shown that people buy up to 40% more then what they intended to get if the store is setup right.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

if we see the originality of the items, it will make us spit at itbasically i saw this vacuum cleaner and i got so engrossed because the lady was cleaning the bathroom with it and it was a reasonable price. then i called the number to buy it. I called it and here is the dialogue"Hello? ---- Vacuum Cleaner Products speaking,""Yes. I'd like to buy an vacuum cleaner.""Oh, ok. For 30 days, you pay 46.59 dollars and then you give the full price of 159.99""What? Are you kidding me? Can you please repeat that? There must have been a mistake.""No maam. After you pay 46.59 dollar you will give us 159.99. Is that clear. Now lets go on with the pricing. Paypal or Mastercard?""Um, sorry, but I think there must have been a mistake. I don't want to pay 159.99 dollars. "----------------------------------------------Beep-------------------------------------------------
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Unicore InternationalCompany(Health Care) - Multinational Company - Job type :Networking(Part Time) (Working in About 190 Countries Or In EveryCity) -Not More Than 1 hour To office -Faisalabad(16 offices AreThere) -Gujranwala (12 Offices) Etc Etc etc (Registered Company) YouCan Check it From www.WFDSA.org -Male or Female - Experience and ageno barrier Part-time / Full-time -Monthly Salary commensuratequalifications -No need Of Education03334285836
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: Yup...

Advertising will cause impulse buying. Children will see toys advertised and pester their parents to buy those toys for them.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

I find it hard to believe that a mature, educated, adult (knowing that commercials are trying to sell you something you don't need) will fall into that trap. When I buy something it is because I have a specific need and I searched for it on the internet. By the time I go to the store, I already know that they have what I want in stock for the price I'm willing to spend. But hey..., that's just me ;)Most people are on that <-- side.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

Defending the Advertiser:"Advertising has long had a "bad press." The case against it is detailed and seemingly compelling. It is claimed that advertising entices people, forcing them to buy products they would otherwise not buy. It preys on the fears and psychological weaknesses of people. It is misleading, with its juxtaposition of a beautiful woman and a commercial product, implying that she is somehow part of the deal. It is foolish, what with its contests, marching bands, and jingles. It is an insult to our intelligence... ...How strong is the case? First, it seems clear that advertising does not lure or force people to buy what they would not otherwise buy. Advertising attempts to persuade people — perhaps in ways some members of the community find objectionable. But it does not and cannot coerce. (Fraudulent advertising is logically equivalent to theft, and is not to be confused with advertising per se. If the seller advertises wheat but delivers rocks, he has actually stolen the money price of "wheat.")"([Excerpted from Defending the Undefendable (1976; 2008). Walter Block] ( http://mises.org/daily/5329/Defending-the-Advertiser  )
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

Needs are not artificial pretty much sums this up in a nut shell
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

They are more creating phony wants, rather than needs. We know we don't need the new brillo pad from Mr.Clean than promises to make your dishes sparkle, when we already have a sponge that so far hasn't caused anyone to get food poisoning, we want it though because it's a luxury item advertised with beautiful people, great results and a price that claims savings even though you'd save more by not buying it.Most people can't have a need made. Some people have a disorder where they feel a literal need to shop, and that is another story.Most people might see something they like on tv, some new candy bar maker, but if they don't order it online or go out and buy it right away, they will forget about it before the next commercial break.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

Advertisement never took the place of the power to choose. Advertisement just showed what is available, though with great persuasion, but at the end, it is still up to us to take it or not. Another argument is that if it is really true that advertisement makes you buy all the things that is shown in ads, then no advertised product should fail anymore.
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

Unicore InternationalCompany(Health Care) - Multinational Company - Job type :Networking(Part Time) (Working in About 190 Countries Or In EveryCity) -Not More Than 1 hour To office -Faisalabad(16 offices AreThere) -Gujranwala (12 Offices) Etc Etc etc (Registered Company) YouCan Check it From www.WFDSA.org -Male or Female - Experience and ageno barrier Part-time / Full-time -Monthly Salary commensuratequalifications -No need Of Education03334285836
Debate: Does advertising create artificial needs?
Side: No..its up to us

I don't think so, but when it comes to advertising, you must have unique idea hat must start from your brand name, creative ideas as well as after service. The products you offer must also be unique and not providing deceiving information. Like the works shop I have learn from Alexandra Watkins, that business is like a corporate naming that you have to provide its foundation for growth,, see http://eatmywords.com/portfolio/names-in-a-nutshell/  for other related resources.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

They aren't necessary in the thought that not having them will cause you harm or that having them will better protect you from the elements like a less expensive item would. However to establish your character and social status they act as a great first impression maker. For example a vagabond's attire tells a quick story of his potential story, just as a King's crown does.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

To me there is no yes or no to this I think its worth spending money on decent shoes because if you look after them they will last years normally though about £100 gets a decent pair that'll last, I normally buy Solovair, Dr Martens or Loakes they work well for work and Casual. An expensive suit is nice but not as important as decent shoes so I quite often buy a cheaper suit or trousers and dress it up with nice shoes and a nice tie and the suit looks sharp.Its accesories that are important and what gets you noticed so I probably spend more on Shoes, Belts, Braces and Ties than any other part of my Wardrobe. I'm not bothered about designer clothes quite often their not better quality than cheaper clothes, if I buy any branded stuff its because its by a make that I know is good quality and worth the money.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

I think buying expensive clothes is not a big issue,, if I talk about me then I always used to prefer cheap clothes but if there's a family occasion in my home then I really don't bother to buy expensive clothes.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

How am I supposed to get my swag on if my boots aren't worth a small country's GDP?!? D:<
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

If someone wants to make an impression or attract attention, then expensive clothes are necessary.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

Designer clothes, no. Quality clothes, yes.Right now I'm wearing a sixty dollar pair of 5.11 Tactical pants. I'll never go back to a thrift store for pants again. They're comfortable, tough, stain resistant, breathable, have lots of pockets... They're awesome. Does this mean you can't find good clothes at thrift stores? Of course not. And there's a strong difference between what I'm wearing now, and spending $200 on some pair of jeans just because it has a marketable name on it, when you don't know if it will fall apart or "go out of style" first. But as far as fancy clothes, here's a tip: a $4,000 ill-fitting suit will never look as good as a $400 suit that fits like a glove. Find a good tailor, the'll make or break what you're wearing. Know where the fine line is where you're paying for quality, but go no farther- $1,000 boots are only so expensive because people will pay for them, and flaunt them as a status symbol. If you want to wear a status symbol on your feet, that's your business, but dress shoes need not be so complicated. If you pay more than a hundred bucks- plus, depending on your needs, a good set of inserts, maybe a shine- you probably paid too much.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

I buy from charity shops. Designer clothes, but cheaper than normal clothes new.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

I'm a guy i dont know that much about fashion but it is really not necessary it can be for a job interview but for casual wear no
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

I have watched enough morning news channels to inform me the latest trends that go up to thousands of dollars by brand name to be thousands of dollars cheaper if you can find em in clearance stores as well, there is look-alikes which are also thousands of dollars cheaper than the brand-name.I have been dragged into enough clothing stores to know that their are clothes that look exactly the same but one is extremely higher in price.Why is a Gucci purse $1,955.99, I don't know and I never want to know. I am fine spending $80 on a purse for my wife, although, she probably has wasted thousands of dollars behind my back.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

Is the average suit really $2,000 - $3,000? You can get a great suit for a few hundred if you look for deals.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

It sounds a bit suspect to me in the UK you can get a bespoke suit for that sort of money and an off the peg suit from £50 upwards
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: Yes, they can be

You can certainly get a suit off the rack for cheap, but if it doesn't fit properly the whole point of wearing a suit is lost; unless one has a very 'standard' body type, it's going to need to be tailored to your fit; the cost of this significantly narrows the gap between a good suit and an off the rack one...
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

Expensive is subjective term, for prices are merely determined by individual value scales supplemented by supply and demand. Basically, willingness to pay is fundamental to prices.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

From the viewpoint of the poor, which I share, expensive clothes are unnecessary. How would you feel if you had scarcely anything to eat, and there are people around you, who can help you, but who are rather spending their money on expensive clothes?However, decent and beautiful clothes can be bought at affordable prices, supporting local markets.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

No they are not, at the end of the day, branded products will not that be a concern, what people will just think, would be lucky enough to have something to wear.Regards.RodneyWorks for Alexandra Watkins naming firm, see us at http://eatmywords.com/services/workshops/
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

If designer clothes make you happy and you have the money, then by all means by them.But they are certainly not necessary. You can construct a good impression with smart clothes that don't have to be expensive. First impressions are fundamental but anyone can make a good impression even if you have cheap clothes.
Debate: Are expensive clothes necessary?
Side: No, they are not

expensive clothes not necessary .expensive clothes cheat buyer who want good design .I won't buy expensive clothes .
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

The exploitation of less fortunate nations has gone too far. The workers there are deliberately paid less for their services so profit margins can be increased. This is unfair exploitation of labor and must be stopped.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

This sort of business practice is most common it communist countries like china and Vietnam. Though the factory's are contracted to western companies by the country's government and are sometimes owned by the companies themselves its the lack of labor laws in these countries that allows this to happen. So I agree as far as it needs to stop but the title should be should the communist countries like china and Vietnam stop allowing and using child labor.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

1.) China isn't communist2.) Vietnam isn't communist3.) In Vietnam, child labor is regulated, and most children work in the family business. (Not defending it, but it is better than such nations as India)4.) The countries which have the most problems (and the ones I am referring to) are Bangladesh, India, et cetera. The recent disaster In Bangladesh happened because a western company, Joe Fresh, made people work in deplorable conditions.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

China isn't communist are you serious? It's under the control of the Chines communist party, its called the people's republic of China, its army is called the People's Liberation Army, it has secret police (the MSS), it has extensive social programs including government healthcare, sounds pretty communist to me.Vietnam isn't communist I don't know a whole lot about Vietnam so you may be correct ill look it up. And if you are upset about the conditions in the joe fresh factory then you should be mad at the government of Bangladesh for not haveing better labor laws.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

com·mu·nismnoun 1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole.Furthermore, the term: "Communist state" is an oxymoron. Please refer to the Communist Manifesto.Same goes for Vietnam, however Vietnam is Socialist, whereas China is state capitalist. The name of the ruling party has noting to do with anything. When I say this, I think of the American "Democratic Party". It may connote democracy, but this party is full on plutocratic. Anyhow, I am mad at the government of Bangladesh, but I am also very frustrated with the corporations. They are the ones which set up these factories. No matter how one looks at it, the corporations are not absolved of blame.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Ignore that person. You and I both know that China is a communist nation.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

Haha, I'm back! ;)Anyway, China really isn't Communisthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-10-02/how-america-can-beat-chinas-state-capitalism
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

It's ruled by the Chinese Communist party that makes it communist. It has extensive social programs the government runs everything and on top of that it has a deplorable human rights record. Yep sounds pretty damn communist. The fact is the government owns most if not all of the means of production in China that's a BIG part of communism. Even thought there are "free market zones" in china the government really owns all the factory's in china COMMUNIST.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: Yes!

The United States is run by the Democratic Party. Does that make it democratic?Canada is run by the Conservative Party, does that make it Conservative?Burkana Faso is ruled by the Congress for Democracy and Progress! Does that make it progressive and democratic?Furthermore, before you think you are an "expert" on communism, perhaps read the Communist Manifesto at least. China has no workers owning the means of production, no democracy, and lots of capitalism and wage exploitation on top of a class ridden society. NOT communism my friend.If you answered yes any of these, than I give up. However, the actual answer is no, the same goes for the PRC.
Debate: Should the Capitalists Stop Using Child Labor?
Side: No, I don't care...

No workers owning the means of production, no democracy, lots of capitalism wage exploitation on top of a class ridden society sounds like every communist state that's ever existed ever.