azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Someone who has an abortion is either immature, selfish, uneducated or just plain cruel.This is not true in every case. Do not make idiotic blanket statements like this. They want to have sex and not deal with the baby that comes with sex.It logically follows from this statement that sex should ONLY be performed when you want a baby. Sex for pleasure, prohibited. Sex for reproduction ONLY. Do you hold these views? How selfish of someone to want to kill their own son/daughter. The thing is, it's not a person yet. Therefore, no harm done. If you don't want the responsibility then give the baby up for adoption, that is what you owe your child.It's not your choice to make. What if she doesn't want to go through giving birth to a child? It's her choice, not yours. You have no right to force her to continue a pregnancy. She should be able to abort the baby if she wants to. The right to life, make a stand for those that can't yet stand up for themselves.Up until ~25 weeks, they have no awareness or knowledge of their own existence. If they were aborted right there, they wouldn't know the difference.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Hey man there are ways around an abortion, no matter what happened they can choose life. Why don't you put yourself in the babies shoes that are aborted, then ask yourself would you like a chance at life? The baby might not be able to answer then, but down the road they sure can. I hold the views that sex out of wedlock is wrong, and when you are married of course I believe in being able to have sex with your partner for pleasure. However most females having abortions are very young and immature, they're in many ways unable to make a rash decision regarding abortion. Many that do have abortions regret it terribly, so it seems it's the wrong choice all around. I know I am glad my mom chose life, aren't you.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Why don't you put yourself in the babies shoes that are aborted, then ask yourself would you like a chance at life?Because it doesn't matter! You are asking me this question while asking me to take hindsight into account. The baby would have no knowledge, no sentience, awareness, consciousness, ANYTHING. It wouldn't be capable of thinking that thought, so nothing would be lost. If I were aborted, i wouldn't be "sad" about it later. I would have no ability to be sad. I wouldn't have a brain.  The baby might not be able to answer then, but down the road they sure can.That's what I've been saying. But what you don't understand though is that the "person" in this fetus does not exist yet. When I was a fetus, I as in the person I am did not exist. Many that do have abortions regret it terribly, so it seems it's the wrong choice all around.Whether its the right choice or the wrong choice, IT IS THEIR DECISION TO MAKE. Your beliefs do not justify you in making them into law. The constitution says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Most views against abortion stem directly from religion.  I know I am glad my mom chose life, aren't you.You are saying you are glad with hindsight in mind. If you had been aborted, you would not have noticed anything different. You wouldn't be all sad that your mom had aborted you, you wouldn't exist.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

I know I am glad my mom chose life, aren't you.no.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

"How selfish of someone to want to kill their own son/daughter.The thing is, it's not a person yet. Therefore, no harm done."No doubt that a fetus is not a person, but a not fully developed person. However, a fetus is also a life that deserve the right to live.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Just to clarify for the people that say there isn't proof of God's existence, here are some pretty solid proofs.First, the non-existence of God cannot be proven. One cannot prove a universal negative. Alternatively, the existence of God is provable.The concept, design, and intricate details of our world necessitate an intelligent designer.Both direct and indirect evidence for God’s existence are well known and well documented. Nothing in history is better known or better documented than the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. We even use the year of His birth as the basis for our calendar. He perfectly matched the over 100 unique Messianic prophecies in the Old Testament regarding His birth, life, death, and resurrection. The laws of probability cannot give us a reasonable explanation for either the Messianic predictions or the resurrection, let alone both by the same person. Jesus’ miracles were witnessed by many and were documented redundantly for additional corroboration. He was seen by at least 500 people after His resurrection. He was seen ascending into heaven. His transfiguration was seen by Peter, James, and John. His wisdom in dealing with many circumstances was astounding. He never promoted Himself or His miracles. C. S. Lewis stated that He couldn’t have just been a good teacher. He was either a liar, lunatic, or Lord. He didn’t even come close to meeting the profile of a liar or lunatic, so He had to be God. Jesus Christ also supported the truth of the Old Testament and quoted it many times. Consequently, with Jesus Christ, we have an eyewitness to the truth of the Old Testament. This gives credibility to the creation account and God’s interaction with man. The entire Old Testament account is about how God is trying to have a relationship with man while man is separating himself from God by sin. It tells how God is long-suffering and merciful and ultimately how God sent His Son to die for our sins so God could ultimately have a relationship with us. God’s interaction with man in the Old Testament was often and powerful. Some of the main interactions included Adam, Cain, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Joshua, the Israelites, the prophets, and the kings. In addition to Jesus’ testimony to the truth of the Old Testament, ancient manuscripts, archaeology, and internal consistency also testify to its truth. Consequently, much direct evidence including eyewitness accounts and indirect evidence corroborate the existence of God and the truth of the Bible.My point is to not start another debate inside this debate, just to give you some evidence of God's existence.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

The concept, design, and intricate details of our world necessitate an intelligent designer.False. Complexity does not indicate intelligent design. Intelligent design was never a reputable argument for god.  He perfectly matched the over 100 unique Messianic prophecies in the Old Testament regarding His birth, life, death, and resurrection.Like what?Jesus’ miracles were witnessed by many and were documented redundantly for additional corroboration. He was seen by at least 500 people after His resurrection. He was seen ascending into heaven. His transfiguration was seen by Peter, James, and John.All irrelevant and invalid as proof of god. Eye witness testimony is not proof, nor is it good evidence. Personal testimony is notoriously unreliable. This gives credibility to the creation account and God’s interaction with man.No it doesn't. Consequently, much direct evidence including eyewitness accounts and indirect evidence corroborate the existence of GodLike what? Eyewitness accounts are not good evidence, it's terrible evidence.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Creation points to a Creator, things just don't create themselves. If you went on a space ship ride to mars, saw there were buildings there, you would assume that someone or something designed them, then created them.Read the Old Testament and find out. Go ask a Theologian, I am sure he would answer any of your questions.IF you don't believe documents and peoples testimonies of his existence to be true, then clearly you must not believe in any History. So I guess George Washington didn't exist because all we have are historical evidence based off events and peoples encounters.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Creation points to a Creator, things just don't create themselves.Does it now? Is that why world renowned physicists Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss both believe the universe self created itself? Let's assume for a moment you're right, creation points to a creator. How do you know this creator is intelligent? What if it's just some inanimate universe creating existence? Kind of like how the Higgs Boson gives particles mass. You are arrogant and lacking in knowledge to assert that the only possible explanation for the universe is god. If you went on a space ship ride to mars, saw there were buildings there, you would assume that someone or something designed them, then created them.Buildings are not analogous to universe creation. Sorry. IF you don't believe documents and peoples testimonies of his existence to be true, then clearly you must not believe in any History. So I guess George Washington didn't exist because all we have are historical evidence based off events and peoples encounters.This is a straw man argument, for this is clearly not my position. All you did was twist and distort my position to make it easy to make me look stupid. Congratulations on dishonest debate tactics. Documents and personal testimonies of the supernatural events in the bible are going to require A LOT more evidence. The claims of George Washington's existence and the deeds he committed, none of them were supernatural shit like "washington once cast a spell and vaporized an entire army" or "washington summoned a tornado into battle and destroyed the british". If there was crazy shit like that about Washington, people wouldn't believe it.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Okie dokie, keep right on believing that nothing banged itself into everything. That makes much more sense than a Creator God!
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

God created the universe does not make sense. You would then need to explain what created god. Otherwise, it's special pleading. Nice try. You're new to this, aren't you?
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Science supports the notion that the universe had a beginning and that something independent of the universe brought it into being. The well-accepted scientific belief in the universe's origination and expansion and the second law of thermodynamics (energy tends to spread out) support the universe's absolute beginning from nothing. This sounds remarkably like Genesis 1:1! The chances of a thing's popping into being from literally nothing are exactly zero. Being cannot come from non-being; there's no potential for this. Even skeptic David Hume called this "absurd" - a metaphysical impossibility. Believers reject the claim, "Everything that exists has a cause" and affirm "Whatever begins to exist has a cause." To say "Everything needs a cause would necessarily exclude an uncaused God. This is "question-begging" (assuming what needs to be proved). It's like presuming that since all reality is physical (which can't be demonstrated), a nonphysical God cannot exist.Why think everything needs a cause, since an uncaused entity is logical and intelligible? Through the centuries, many believed that the universe didn't need a cause; it was self-existent. They did not believe an uncaused universe was illogical or impossible. But now that contemporary cosmology points to the universe's beginning and an external cause, skeptics insist that everything needs a cause after all!A good number of uncaused things exist. Logical laws are real; we can't think coherently without using them (e.g., the law of identity, X = X, tells you: "This book is this book"). Moral laws or virtues (love, justice) are real. But none of these began to exist. They are eternal and uncaused (being in God's mind).The question "Who made God?" commits the category fallacy. To say that all things, even God, must be caused is incoherent - like the question "How does the color green taste?" Why fault God for being uncaused? when we rephrase the question to say, "What caused the self-existent uncaused Cause, who is by definition unmade, to exist?" the answer is obvious.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

" The chances of a thing's popping into being from literally nothing are exactly zero. Being cannot come from non-being; there's no potential for this."Then who created God?
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Science supports the notion that the universe had a beginning and that something independent of the universe brought it into being. The well-accepted scientific belief in the universe's origination and expansion and the second law of thermodynamics (energy tends to spread out) support the universe's absolute beginning from nothing. This sounds remarkably like Genesis 1:1! The chances of a thing's popping into being from literally nothing are exactly zero. Being cannot come from non-being; there's no potential for this. Even skeptic David Hume called this "absurd" - a metaphysical impossibility.Believers reject the claim, "Everything that exists has a cause" and affirm "Whatever begins to exist has a cause." To say "Everything needs a cause would necessarily exclude an uncaused God. This is "question-begging" (assuming what needs to be proved). It's like presuming that since all reality is physical (which can't be demonstrated), a nonphysical God cannot exist.Why think everything needs a cause, since an uncaused entity is logical and intelligible? Through the centuries, many believed that the universe didn't need a cause; it was self-existent. They did not believe an uncaused universe was illogical or impossible. But now that contemporary cosmology points to the universe's beginning and an external cause, skeptics insist that everything needs a cause after all!A good number of uncaused things exist. Logical laws are real; we can't think coherently without using them (e.g., the law of identity, X = X, tells you: "This book is this book"). Moral laws or virtues (love, justice) are real. But none of these began to exist. They are eternal and uncaused (being in God's mind).The question "Who made God?" commits the category fallacy. To say that all things, even God, must be caused is incoherent - like the question "How does the color green taste?" Why fault God for being uncaused? when we rephrase the question to say, "What caused the self-existent uncaused Cause, who is by definition unmade, to exist?" the answer is obvious.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

See the answer I already provided you in a previous dispute, Blah blah.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Nice copy and paste from If God Made the Universe, Who Made God?: 130 Arguments for Christian Faith. I'm not answering this, since you didn't care enough to come up with your own argument. Hijacking someone else's argument, claiming it to be your own, is plagiarism.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

I didn't copy and paste. I own the book and typed it all out here. I didn't try to pass it off as my own either!
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

No, you passed it off as your own, as evidenced by the fact that you had no disclaimer. If you had no intention of plagiarizing, you need to disclose who your source is and what you're quoting. You did neither, so you passed it off as your own.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Obviously I did not pass it off as my own, because you easily found that it was not my own!
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Because they are world renowned physicists and both believe the same thing, makes it credible? Hawking also said that there is a such thing as made up time, so instead of acknowledging the possibility there is a God he's making things up now. What outstanding proof that is. I know this creator to be intelligent because look at the creation. There is no way something or someone could create such a complex and fine tuned planet, being unintelligent.Ok say you saw a well groomed vegetable garden on mars, would you assume it just got there? Or someone/something created it?Ok let me get this straight, in your opinion just because Jesus committed miraculous acts proves He's not credible? So because Washington didn't commit any miraculous signs proves he is. People went to there deaths saying it to be true about seeing Jesus. If Jesus didn't exist and was just a myth why then did so many people give their lives to say he did exist. What person do you know would die for a myth?If you are interested in more proof than what I can give, please watch some God debates, like William Lane Craig VS Christopher Hitches, or Dinesh D'souza VS Dan Barker. Theists vs atheists.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Because they are world renowned physicists and both believe the same thing, makes it credible?It does not. It just shows you that there are more possibilities than just "god is the only answer to the creation of the universe". Hawking also said that there is a such thing as made up time, so instead of acknowledging the possibility there is a God he's making things up now.He doesn't acknowledge God because there is no evidence for God. I know this creator to be intelligent because look at the creation. There is no way something or someone could create such a complex and fine tuned planet, being unintelligent.Intelligent design is not a valid argument. This is just an argument from incredulity. "Because I can think of no other way for it to happen, it had to be god!" Is that what your thought process has been reduced to? "I don't know, therefore GOD!" That's all you're saying. I don't know how everything is so perfectly fine tuned, therefore god! You don't "know" this creator to be intelligent, you don't know if there even is a creator. You believe it, because it makes you feel special inside. It' all wishful thinking on your part. Ok say you saw a well groomed vegetable garden on mars, would you assume it just got there? Or someone/something created it?Are you really this stupid? Well groomed vegetable gardens on Mars are NOT analogous to universe creation. I already said this premise earlier. Ok let me get this straight, in your opinion just because Jesus committed miraculous acts proves He's not credible?What?? I didn't say that. I said Jesus existed, but he did not perform any supernatural miracles or do anything supernatural. He was a normal person, like you or I who gathered a following.  If Jesus didn't exist and was just a myth why then did so many people give their lives to say he did exist. What person do you know would die for a myth?A person who is deceived. They believe the myth to be true. If you are interested in more proof than what I can give, please watch some God debates, like William Lane Craig VS Christopher Hitches, or Dinesh D'souza VS Dan Barker. Theists vs atheists.I have watched plenty. I am not new to this subject.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Jeremiah 8:8“How can you say, ‘We are wise,And the law of the Lord is with us’?Look, the false pen of the scribe certainly works falsehood."This is a verse in the Bible that states that it is false. Christians strongly believe that the Bible is the true word of God and there isn't a single lie in it. So this leaves the question, is the Bible false or is Jeremiah?
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

The entire Bible is reliable, blithering Blah, whether or not you believe it to be. God doesn't need your opinion to make His Word true.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Respond to this profile. Blah123 was one I made after I had forgotten my original info.The ENTIRE Bible is not completely reliable. It is full of contradictions and man-made stories. Do you believe that Moses parted the Red Sea? The actual journey took 40 years. How about the story of Noah? Two of every species on one boat. The Bible gives the size of the boat too. It isn't nearly large enough to hold two of every species. Did you know that God sent the flood because Angels were interbreeding with humans? How about the story of Adam and Eve? God said "on the day you eat from the tree, you shall surely die" but the Bible later mentions that they lived to be 930 years old and so did their kids, even Noah lived for hundreds of years. How about the Tower of Babel story? You must know that different languages didn't begin like that. The gospels themselves have contradictions. One says Jesus taught for one year, while another says he taught for three. My point is that the Bible is not completely accurate. The Bible was passed down orally for many years before it was written.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Yep, good old George is just one of those silly myths kids read about in our fine progressive institutions of lower learning.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Oh, hey! I found a mistake in that sentence. You accidentally wrote "George" probably because you were reading the response above your argument. I think you meant to write "God/Jesus Christ".
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Nope, thanks for trying to help me out there, Markie pooh, but I meant to write George.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

Nope, thanks for trying to help me out there, Markie poohI feel special. but I meant to write George.But God/Jesus Christ fits the sentence perfectly. George, not so much, since we all know George Washington was a real person who didn't do some stupid ass crazy supernatural shit, which the bible claims Jesus did.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

God did supernaturally save George's life on the battlefield, that's for darn tootin' sure!
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

I'm going to have to say, no. There isn't any evidence that god saved Washington on the battlefield. So it's not "darn tootin' sure".
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

There is more than one miraculous story about God's intervention in General George Washington's life! Here is one:http://rjmoeller.com/2010/12/george-washington-and-a-christmas-miracle/
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

R.J. Moeller is a young evangelical conservative (originally) from Chicago who is currently residing in sunny Los Angeles.http://rjmoeller.com/about/Yeah, what idiot would trust a theist to have an objective article?Moron...
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Actually, you MK are the moron because you have chosen not to believe in Jesus! The Bible refers to folks such as you as as fool.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

There is more than one miraculous story about God's intervention in General George Washington's life! Here is one:Seriously? This is what qualifies as irrefutable proof of god's intervention? I'm gonna have to call a non sequitur. Conclusion does not follow. Try again.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Jawkins, here is a wonderful miracle about George Washington!http://www.therealamericanhis-story.com/ gw
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: against abortion

Thank you, I find it odd that people pick and choose what History they want to believe.
Debate: Abortion is it right or wrong?
Side: for abortion

what are you talking about? Nowhere in history does it claim that Washington's victory was an act of god. You can believe the history of Washington, since it does not rest on supernatural phenomena.