Debate: Health Care Should Be Free
Side: Free Health Care

Not because of "progress" but because it has use. Everything has some sort of use, thus, everything has value.The value resources have has nothing to do with money, that's what I'm saying.No trade eh? Well, that pretty much leaves the option of a centralized economy where all production and resources are gathered together and then distributed.Isn't it exactly so even now? I'm sure you've heard of shops and supermarkets and other similar places. You know... the places where everything is gathered together so it could be easily distributed, one place from where everyone could receive the things they need.So yeah, everything would be gathered into one place from where they then are distributed, just as it is now. With no trade the only difference there'd be would be that there'd be no fussing with money, or any fussing other then delivering the goods. Products and resources are gathered, then the order/demand comes, then the things are delivered, the end. No money, no trade, anywhere.Right now resources and products are delivered from where they are made to warehouses, from where they move to further warehouses or directly to the customers or shops, or to further warehouses till they still will go to shops or customers. You think this process would be any different?You act like on a daily basis we produce a ton of stuff, then we just throw it all out because of money.I gave a valid example, assuming an instance like that were to occur. It is only possible with a medium of exchange.Actually you did, it was on a debate about currency and you were talking about how you image a fantasy world with no money.Oh, I remember that... It was about having the ability to imagine a world without money - something I actually can do. That was all it was.I did not say I made up a world in my head and based my opinions on it. You might want to find that debate and reread everything I said there 'cause clearly you are interpreting it as you want to not as it is.You observed I had a different view and concluded I was an idiot. I observe this and conclude that you are indeed an asshole.I observed your arguments which were really really really stupid. Then the conclusion - you're an idiot.And why are you talking to my asshole? I thought you were smart enough to understand that whatever it can say is of no substance other than resulting in a smelly room.Marxism...If you haven't yet noticed I do not care for previously made up things like "Marxism", "Capitalism", "Communism", or anything else like. Then there's the calling you're a communist, a fascist, a liberal, etc. etc... I'm a human, and that's all I am.I give some of my time and money to those who need a little help, and you call me greedy and say I am wasting time? Oh the irony.Hypocrite much, or rather, messed up much? You claim to not be greedy yet you approve the system that promotes greed.Back to the "you must be stoned all the time because you happen to smoke" way of thinking again, eh?Again? I can't remember doing that before, so no, not again.You have a computer, you have internet, you have food, you have shelter, sounds like you have enough for yourself.Assuming you know everything about me, and how my life is. That's rather stupid... Good, at least you're keeping this consistent.You have a very large ego, but a very small amount of knowledge.A large ego, me? No. I just know who I am and what I'm capable of. I know my potential.Knowledge? I know enough to make the right conclusions. You on the other hand might have more knowledge, you might know more insignificant details, but you are completely blinded by all of it. You cannot see which of that knowledge is good and which is bad.It seems to me that whatever amount of knowledge one can have it does not make one smart unless the person has the ability to view it all objectively.I think I've said it before, I'm sure I have. I view the world unbiased and objectively. I look at everything as it is, not based on some previously made up rules that most of humanity likes following without questioning the rules themselves.