azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Here is is the complete scientific findings by NASA itself:http://www.conchiglia.us/UK/UKClettere/07.67UKNASASCOPERTESULLATILMA13.05.07.pdfThe ways the painting was made was far too complicated for mortal men.A replica was made to try and test the painting but it decayed in less than 10 years while the original still stood strong even after 100 yearsA scan led by Dr. Javier Torroella on the painting shows that the paintings hides another microscopic picture in the eyes of mother Mary. That is a feat impossible to do even with modern technologyMany scientists have tried to explain it. All of them reached one conclusion- it is beyond explanation
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Common religious hoax NASA was not involved at all but on the other side research was funded by several "religious" organisation and mainly done in Vatican. That is like letting Nazi and SS officers to investigate the Holocaust.Dr. Javier Torroella is an eye doctor... hmmm"Jude B. Smith, scientists of NASA"... Why I cannot find a single line about him/her anywhere apart of this "document\", not even a paper that suppose to be done by him/her?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

NASA was involved and they confirmed that it is beyond the means of mortal ability. The scan was done with the instruments of an eye-specialist owned by Dr. Javier. And the reports only presented more miracles about the painting.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

There is literally not a single line anywhere on NASA portal not even Google knows about any connection. There is also no scientist related to NASA what so ever called Jude B Smith ...Dr. Javier is an eye doctor, would you let him to do heart surgery on you? I assume not...It is all fabricated by religious fanatics.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Its practically just 5 seconds in google
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Yeah? Why is not a single one link to the NASA webpage? Why all of them are linking same madeup paper, there IS NO SINGLE WORD ON NASA WEB PAGE ABOUT IT.IT IS A HOAX
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Simple Answer: Because they do not want to post anything that they cannot understand. From doctors to manuscripts, there are plenty of emphirical evidences available but they would rather hide it. I wonder how long will you denial last
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Aaaach so now is it Secret NASA conspiration against Catholic Church? :D :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

No. Just pure embarrassment to admit what they do not know.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

and that you know from ... ?Catholic News Agency?www.catholiceducation.org/Catholic.orgwww.visionsofjesuschrist.comLady of Guadalupe istituteor any other independent institute? :D :D :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

WikipediaCheck the reference for the best part
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Mainly Vatican, general Catholic institutions, General painting technique reference... Common for all pictures
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Journal of the American Academy of Religion.University of Chicago Press.http://lifestyle.inquirer.netNumismatics International BulletinJust the first things I saw. Do you have any excuse that would say that this sources are not credible?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

they would be superior because they are older not because they are magical.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

If they can defy everything we learned about then they are still worth calling as "deities"
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

I am most likely significantly smarter than you are, does that makes me divine?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Call me once you manage to create something out of nothing
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

what that suppose to mean ?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Its self explanatory. If you cannot create a miracle, then you are not worthy of worship.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

..you cannot prove that miracle happen, especially when your only source of information is a religious institution with past including multiple genocides, theft, witch hunt etc...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

All my sources came from registered doctors that are respected in the scientific community- all of which were once atheists. Go ahead, amuse me with your denials
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Dentists and eye doctors are the best people to ask a question about physics or 15th century chemistry :DTheir scientific community I assume are people who has bad teeth and or need glasses :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

"In what is the first report on the eyes of the image issued by a physician, he certifies what seems to be the presence of the triple reflection (Samson-Purkinje effect) characteristic of all live human eyes and states that the resulting images are located exactly where they are supossed to be according to such effect, and also that the distortion of the images agree with the curvature of the cornea."Dr Javier was hired to confirm what seems like an effect that should have been existent only on the eyeballs of an animal. Is there a problem?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Again, no paper done on it, second Purkyne effect, happens when you leave a bit of oil on a surface, it is probably everywhere on the picture which is what don't tell you. It can be used for example for glossy effect and so on...As I said before Dr Javier is an eye doctor and not a artist/painter, for him it must weird.Similar technique is being used on paintings that looks like the people stare on you even if you move around them.You can do it on your own with a filtered olive oil and some random painting.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

If you are not content with Dr. Javier's research, then perhaps the other scientists will interest you.José Aste Tonsmann - A professor and scientist of environmental engineering. Used satellite technology to study the painting and concluded that the painting "has not been painted by human hand."Richard Kuhn - Nobel Prize winner in chemistry. said he found that the image did not have natural, animal or mineral colorings and since there were no synthetic colorings in 1531, the image is "inexplicable".Philip Callahan and Jody B. Smith - biophysicists studied the Tilma with Infrared rays. discovered to their surprise that there was no trace of paint and that the fabric had not been treated with any kind of technique."How it is possible to explain this image and its consistency ... on a fabric that has not been treated?" Tonsmann asked. "[How] is it possible that, despite the fact there is no paint, the colors maintain their luminosity and brilliance?"Tonsmann, a Peruvian engineer, added, "Callahan and Smith showed how the image changes in color slightly according to the angle of viewing, a phenomenon that is known by the word iridescence, a technique that cannot be reproduced with human hands."Science has supported the existence of the paranormal. You have no excuse anymore.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

again hoax, no record for anything you have stated .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Google is your friend
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

by the way, could you please also link for me the NASA paper ? :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Done
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Oh you moron :D :D :D :D :DGuadalupe is a nickname for geological survey on MARS :Dhttp://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image feature138.html
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

So whats your point?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

as far You have presented to me as a reference for the magical picture.-50 years dead guy who said something without leaving any evidence for doing so-guy who is financially depended on that picture-fake/made up NASA scientist-bug scientist, who wrote books on magic and detects Tachyons by connecting ordinary electro meter to a ficus Eyedoctor ...? who after examining this http://www.saintanthonyofpadua.net/messaggero/upload/foto/141.jpg says it's a miracle :DI saw more credible evidence for big foot.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

-Its practically just one search away to know everything that Richard has studied. The Guadalupe is one of them-Evidence, got one?-You got to back that one with proof-His name is Dr. Callahan. He has done a major contribution in the field of science and proving the existence of Tachyons is one of them.-Yes, and I can see that you avoided the containing Marian document.I see that you no longer replied to the other arguments. Guess you know what that means, right? :)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Dr. Callahan is a charlatan, CERN has no equipment to detect Tachyons, you need to destroy a star omg... he used vegetables...He is a joke, a freak that worked with ants. He has nothing.Marian document? Another BS without data done by ...let me gues a priest ? Bishop? or any other freak?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Well done. You actually made me laugh this timeLOLFrom here you have two endings, either you stop posting or turn yourself into a laughing stock. Your choice
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

It is a hypothetical particle, linking Wikipedia really shown you intellectual limits. Please I've read it twice, where exactly they talk about detecting it with vegetables?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

"Dr. Callahan explains that a particle moving faster than the speed of light is called a tachyon, and a message sent by such a particle would actually arrive before it was sent. He also states that he published, in 1986, the first experimental proof that tachyon particles actually exist."It was discovered by man who has a passion for biology and nothing more.Be more creative. I know that you can be more hilarious
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Again it is a respected guy between ants freaks, in physics it is just another hoaxer. Sorry Centifolia but degree in bug science does not apply on theoretical physics.There is really no way around it.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

LOLTell that to the people who thanked Dr. Callahan for his studies and still wonders why he never got a Nobel Prize.P.SWhat happened to the other scientists? Why did you skip them? :)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Tell that to the people who thanked Dr. Callahan for his studies and still wonders why he never got a Nobel Prize.said by:"Global Ant Project" < do they feel like someone who is in theoretical physics ?the other scientist? Guy who is on payroll of that picture institution? or the guy who is dead for 50 years and left no evidence about working on it? Or the fake NASA scientist ? Or the eye doctor? :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Yes and can you prove him wrong this time?Seriously? you are still saying that Dr. Jose is being bribed even though you have no evidence? I cant breath hahahahaha!As for Richard, how long exactly would you deny his studies? This is so much fun. Go ahead please, make me laugh harder
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Dr. Jose in an EMPLOYEE of the picture's owner! So yes he gets MONEY for promoting the picture's "magical properties".
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

And where is the document? :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

DO you have someone better than Ants' freak that does High Energy Physics with vegetables?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

His name is Dr. Callahan and his life is much more valuable that you could ever be.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

His name is Dr. Callahan ...and he works his whole life with ants... he has two books about magical rocks and detects hypothetical particles with vegetables...... I haven't finished my Ph.D yet, but I can say with clear conscience. I am more credible.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

You claim that you are more credible and yet you do not even know that published wrong information can result into arrest?Oh god, my sides! hahahahaha!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Publishing wrong paper is not a crime. Being wrong is not crime.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

OH GOD, I CANT HOLD MY LAUGHTER!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

BTW, he is a bug scientist, he has no degree in physics, he published about magical rocks, he thinks that he detected tachyons by using equipment and vegetables from Walmart ...?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

You posted in the wrong argument. But since you no longer try to deny how dumb you are, then surely you know that I won, correct?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

You have failed to present any evidence of the picture being magical.You have tried to trick me with: Bug guy, who detect particle faster than light by using vegetablesFake NASA scientistGuy who is on payroll of the picture's ownerEye Doctor's opinion*50 years old dead guy who "suppose to said" something without leaving evidence.sorry sweetie, try harder.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Repeating it over? pity, I expected some more hilarityDr. Callahan is a well renowned scientist who revealed enough evidences that supports his ridiculous claimsTheres an abundance of empirical evidences that NASA tried to test itYou are claiming something without proofHe is an optician who confirmed the miraculous eye of the Guadalupe His works are readily available through googleYou are no different from the rest of the ignorant neckbeards who come over here thinking that being an edgy Atheist is a cool thing. But when faced with real facts, you all crumble in denial.Go back to whatever site you came from. (Let me guess, YouTube comments?)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Dr. Callahan is a well renowned scientist who revealed enough evidences that supports his ridiculous claimsPlease link me the data sheet.Theres an abundance of empirical evidences that NASA tried to test itlink me to NASA paper (not cathilc paper including word NASA rela NASA paper)He is an optician who confirmed the miraculous eye of the Guadalupean eye doctor, examined painting.... yeah why not :D What about supporting it with some random Dentists findings? :DYou are no different from the rest of the ignorant neckbeards who come over here thinking that being an edgy Atheist is a cool thing. But when faced with real facts, you all crumble in denialYou have not presented single independent paper, not even one. Only religious garbage and fakes. Hoping that I am not going to check if it fits, but I did...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Here you goDoneYeah sure. Now can you prove him wrong?I can see that you are still stuck in denial. I had my fun but you have overstayed your welcome. Just go back to the YouTube comments or Facebook stuff. Your ignorant rumblings has no place over hereP.SFaking a Ph.D is a criminal offense
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

You have failed once again. Googlng NASA paper on Guadalupe shown no single result leading to NASA webpage apart of the one about mars. but you know that, because I have sent that link to you two days ago.Second link leads to profile page of Callagan on web page about ants...
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Precisely. Why would NASA write down the facts that will prove the existence of the paranormal?Second link is YOUR own link that proves how Dr. Callahan has proven all his ridiculous claimsQoute:"He is the author of 106 scientific papers and 12 books on science and a full professor on the graduate faculty of the University of Florida. He is one of 5% of U.S. Scientists in the Who’s Who of Technology today. He retired from the USDA on June 20, 1986, and is now on the staff of the Olive W. Garvey Center for the improvement of Human Functioning, Inc., Wichita, Kansas as an infrared systems and low energy consultant."Dr. Callahan explains that a particle moving faster than the speed of light is called a tachyon, and a message sent by such a particle would actually arrive before it was sent. He also states that he published, in 1986, the first experimental proof that tachyon particles actually exist. (One of the world's great unsolved mysteries is why Dr. Callahan has never been honored with the Nobel Prize in physics for such an amazing and historic achievement.)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

"He is the author of 106 scientific papers and 12 books on science and a full professor on the graduate faculty of the University of Florida. He is one of 5% of U.S. Scientists in the Who’s Who of Technology today. He retired from the USDA on June 20, 1986, and is now on the staff of the Olive W. Garvey Center for the improvement of Human Functioning, Inc., Wichita, Kansas as an infrared systems and low energy consultant."Dr. Callahan explains that a particle moving faster than the speed of light is called a tachyon, and a message sent by such a particle would actually arrive before it was sent. He also states that he published, in 1986, the first experimental proof that tachyon particles actually exist. (One of the world's great unsolved mysteries is why Dr. Callahan has never been honored with the Nobel Prize in physics for such an amazing and historic achievement.)from page about ants, no valid for physics sorry.sorry conspiracy theories done by religious fanatics about NASA hiding "the truth" are truly retarded.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

It presented valid references and evidences. Unless you can prove them wrong, it will stand true
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

No, in science you have to prove that you are right. This is not religion. His paper on Tachyons has not been accepted by any peer reviewed journal.There is no way around it. His work on bugs is surely excellent but he sucks in Physics.You are obviously incapable of understanding that simple fact.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

And he did. How else can he publish a hundred papers and dozens of books and even earn a good title in the field of science if he never presented any evidence? His papers on Tachyons are not only widely appreciated but also brought him fame in the scientific community.Come on, recycling your exuces is a fascination for no oneLet me guess, you will deny what made laugh a few minutes ago, right?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

He published mainly about bugs on bugs websites his paper on Tachyons is not recognized it is a bogus. ....Tachyons are not only widely appreciated but also brought him fame in the scientific communityI would like a link to some recognized, physics journals talking about his awesome discoveries :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

DoneQoute:"Dr. Callahan proved the existence of tachyon using fig leaves and an oscilloscope"Lets see if you can formulate a new excuse or you would rather recycle something
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Yes I have told you several times he used Ficus :D :D :D :D :Dpoor old guy :DA New Paradigm in Holistic Healing FUCK :D :D :D :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

So whats your point? Thanks for admitting that he is right, though
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

He is publishing about magic/healing rocks/holistics ...sorry but he discredited himself."Publishing" in science means something little different than in general spoken English.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

So, can you prove him wrong?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Again science is from real world ,it is not a religion. He has to conclusively proof he is right.... It is done by sending his findingto all prestigious journals on physics who will then test it and if it passes it will be accepted and published. Then it will be read, criticized and retested by the community.This is why BS is not passing.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

So? Where is your evidence that he is wrong?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Not published in a single Physics journal, no evidence that any students/ university has tried to follow his protocol and retest it.Also his "detection" method is very trivial and to be honest quite comical.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

All it takes is just a single google search to find everything you need. Afraid of admitting the truth, aren't you?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Give me link to a peer reviewed paper done by nonreligious recognized institution or it did not happen.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

DoneEDIT: You are no longer funny, let alone be entertaining. Im so tired of your brainless comments. Do the world a favor and go back to YouTube, please?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

As I said before, he is a charlatan publishing on magic, never published in non insect paper that matters... no matter how many times you link the book about magic and tachyons ...it will not became truth...He knows shit about physics and yet this discredited charlatan is only hope for your magical picture :D
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

After all those articles your excuses never even grow a single muscle? HAHAHAHA!
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

You have not sent a single physics journal, not even one. You have tried Newspaper, that didn't work, then Journal on religious studies that does not works too.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Repeating the argumentDenial of faultChanging the topicIf you are gonna bait someone to forget how you humiliated yourself by claiming that Defemation is not a crime, faked your Ph.d, replied with unintelligent words, and refusal to admit your loss, then you truly are an embarrassment to mankind.No joke. The world will be less polluted once you hanged yourself
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Here we are again crying :DUnless I have forgotten, you have presented only fake scientist, magic bug hoaxer, dead guy and a guy who works for the picture's owners...I have only asked for one reputable source. What I've got? A freakshow or religious weirdos and a freak...Why is it with "miracles" allays like that?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

I have no intention of beating the dead horse. The way you repeat the argument proves that you learned nothing, except humiliation.The truth is painful to admit, isnt it? Either way, kill youself