azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

I don't thing I have ever heard you say anything funny. It might help if you check out the Geico Insurance cavemen pretending to be Neanderthals buck naked in the funniest of the two evolution storyline videos.http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Evolution 57EVOLOTION: Serious VS Funny
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I don't thing I have ever heard you say anything funny.You have no sense of humor. It might help if you check out the Geico Insurance cavemen pretending to be Neanderthals buck naked in the funnies of the two evolution storyline videos.That makes no sense.EVOLOTION: Serious VS FunnyThe great thing is that science against evolution loses all credibility by releasing a fake evolution video to attempt to be funny.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Both of the videos portraying evolution are accurate to the story of evolution. They tell the same story. I think the one with the naked Geico insurance commercial "cavemen" pretending to be missing links or Neaderthals is the much funnier version.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

One of the videos was accurate the other one was a sad mockery that proved whoever made the video didn't have a leg to stand on when they criticize evolution.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

What part of either video was not accurate in telling the story of evolution? Does evolution not teach that reptiles evolved into mammals after multi celled animals evolved from single cell animals? Both videos portray the "facts" of evolution accurately. If you don't like it, too bad....oh, one thing that was obviously a joke was in the video where the real life Geico insurance company t.v. commercial "cavemen" were walking buck naked pretending to be missing links or Neanderthals or whatever. Tell me that's not a joke.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

The video with the dinosaur in a bra was not accurate at all. There wasn't a single thing in the entire video that science claims.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

science is not a person who makes claims. Evolution claims that mammals evolved from reptiles, and that means that they developed hair, breasts, and entirely different circulatory systems in order to have homeostatic temperature control. Those changes could not have happened gradually as the gradual mutations could not have survived. Somewhere along the line, there had to be a sudden change for any mammalian trait to emerge and the animal survive the change. "Boobzilla" is a accurate representation of the evolutionary assertions.Congratulations on being the first person showing any capacity to even discuss the OP videos....even though you don't like it, congratulations anyways. Too bad you could not have offered decent conversation in the actual debate.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

You so stupid, boy.....you got your feelins on yo sleeve so you get dragged around by your dumb monkey tail
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

As someone who understands evolution, you can trust me when I tell you that boobzilla is not actually a part of evolution.I did offer decent conversation. You banned me any way.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

There had to be a critter like boobzilla somewhere along the line in the evolutionary progression story. Boobzilla is an accurate representation of that creature, except maybe the bra should have been white...or pink, but not blue. Blue is for boys.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Nope. Evolution says we shouldn't see boobzilla.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

There had to be a critter like boobzilla somewhere along the line in the evolutionary progression story. Boobzilla is an accurate representation of that creature, except maybe the bra should have been white...or pink, but not blue. Blue is for boys...........Or correct me. Did mammals supposedly suddenly appear, with all the mammalian traits and no mixture of reptilian and mammalian traits such as in boobzilla? Is that what the first video is portraying, a sudden mutation of reptiles into mammals with all of the mammalian traits emerging at once and the new animal no longer displaying reptilian features such as cold blooded, scales instead of hair, and egg laying or live birth without nursing of the young?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Science is evolution. Evolution is science.Gradual changes have been shown to be viable, so your claim is false.Boobzilla would disprove evolution since evolution is gradual change.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

science is what you can show me in a way I can observe it. A video that displays computer graphics causing one animal to merge into another animal is not science, it's make believe. Until you can show me a reptile changing into a mammal, it is not science for me to believe it happened. Evolution is conjecture of hypothesis, and cannot be shown scientifically. That's why they had to draw phony pictures to make movies to pretend like the morphing in the movie actually happened in slow motion over kamzillions of years. That's not science, and neither is the Geico cavemen actors strutting buck naked pretending to be missing links or Neanderthals.If "gradual changes" are viable to change reptiles into mammals and not just finches into different kind of finches which adapted to their environments......then Boobzilla is indeed an accurate portrayal of the evolutionary tail (or tale if you can't see the pun in the tail)If gradual changes are viable, then Boobzilla is viable and even necessary in the evolutionary spiel.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Evolution has been shown to many people who understand reality, so evolution is still science.The computer display showing one small meeting into another is the boobzilla video.Evolution has been shown scientifically.You can't call boobzilla accurate for the idea that everything was gradual and for the idea that everything wasn't gradual. How do you not see this?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

really? What part in the video is not claimed by evolutionists? What part of the video is not in agreement with evolutionary theory? What part of the video with the dinosaur was in disagreement with the video with the naked guys pretending to cavemen?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

What part of either video was not accurate in telling the story of evolution? Does evolution not teach that reptiles evolved into mammals after multi celled animals evolved from single cell animals? Both videos portray the "facts" of evolution accurately. If you don't like it, too bad....oh, one thing that was obviously a joke was in the video where the real life Geico insurance company t.v. commercial "cavemen" were walking buck naked pretending to be missing links or Neanderthals or whatever. Tell me that's not a joke.......the emperor has no clothes.........hahahhahhahhah give me a break..if that is not a joke, you have got to be kidding. Both videos are mockeries.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I am sorry that you believe that videos depicting reality are mockeries as well as videos that are clear mockeries.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

They are both the same, they both tell the same story, they are both mockeries which you are expected to believe really happened.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Muhammad Ali could beat the shit out of Jesus .
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ would easily kill Mohammed just like he would show you whose boss.Go tell that to Jesus's face!Well, go, go, goJesus!
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

He is obviously talking about Ali in his prime and not Ali now. In both of their primes Ali would beat the snot out of Jesus. The guy could make medicine sick, he could beat up a rock, he moved like a butterfly, and stung like a bee. Jesus couldn't handle that.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Ali could do none of that.Jesus had beaten the shit out of hordes of Pharisees, which just his fists at first, but since they refused to accept they had lost, he later stripped them naked and beat them bloody with a huge and nasty whip.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Jesus had beaten the shit out of hordes of PhariseesThe Pharisees were a bunch of old Jews. Have you seen Frazier?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

The Pharisees were not always old.The Pharisees were just like priests and prophets.Plenty of young men were included too.Do you really like Mohammed all that much?You seem to adore him.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

He was one of the greatest if not the greatest boxer to ever live. Have you seen that one video where he is trapped in the corner and the guy throws like 10 punches at him and misses every single one because Ali was dodging them, then he does a little dance afterwards to acknowledge what just happened?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Mohammed was not a boxer, other than what you see in the film.Doesn't compare what Jesus did though.He beat about 100 Pharisees in a fist fight and all those Pharisees were like three weight classes heavier than Jesus.Obsessive or what.And Saintnow is just gonna try 'n' ban me, lol, come on, try it!
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Mohammed was not a boxer, other than what you see in the film.Of course he was. He fought all over the world. The Thrilla in Manila is famous.Doesn't compare what Jesus did though.But, Jesus couldn't compare at boxing.He beat about 100 Pharisees in a fist fight and all those Pharisees were like three weight classes heavier than Jesus.Jesus weighed like 50 pounds soaking wet. They could have weighed 100 pounds. That's not impressive. And, I bet that number is exaggerated.And Saintnow is just gonna try 'n' ban me, lol, come on, try it!He is an idiot. He banned me from a debate, and responded to me telling me he didn't want me to respond.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Jesus had to fight loads of Pharisees, 1000's of them, it was unlikely that all of them weighed just 100lbs.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I don't believe you at all. You keep multiplying how many old geezers Jesus fought by 10 each time you reply.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

The average age was likely to be around 35, they weren't old geesers.One Pharisees is singular for the plural of 10 Pharisees.Just like one pi is singular for the plural of 10 pi.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

The average age was likely to be around 35, they weren't old geesers.That was old back then.One Pharisees is singular for the plural of 10 Pharisees.No it isn't.Just like one pi is singular for the plural of 10 pi.That doesn't mean that every time you see the word pi it makes sense to multiply it by 10.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

35 was not old during Jesus's day.Except in this sense it does make sense to multiply 1 Pharisees by 10.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

35 was the tail end of the average life expectancy approximately 2000 years ago, so I'd say 35 was quite old back then.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

No, 35 was not the tail end.Why do you assume it was?It wasn't.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

I assume that it was because all the information I have seen on this puts the average life expectancy of that part of the world at ~40, which would make mid to late thirties the tail end of their life.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Unfortunately that happens not to be the case.Average was probably around 70.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Out of curiosity, where are you getting that number from?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

From a lot of historically accurate and scientifically accurate websites.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Can you cite any of them?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Of course!I shall cite them!Source: www.Loads of them and counting.comI just did!
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

So why claim you have sources if you aren't able to provide them, out of curiosity?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

I just did cite them!I cited the entire internet!So I therefore had cited that as well!It is like me asking you to cite a website that proves that the colour blue is liked by a lot of people! You couldn't possibly, because it is found all over the internet!(Well, you could, but it would be VERY DIFFICULT to site them)
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Citation: http://study.com/academy/lesson/evidence-for-the-big-bang-theory-background-radiation-red-shift-and-expansion.html If it really is all over the internet, why does it seem hard for you to provide even one source?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

You are getting mixed up with these thread by the way.It was on the other thread that we were talking about the big bang.On this thread we were talking about the tail-end of the age of death in Jesus's time.The thing is, this fact about 70 being the real tail end is so well known that it's ingrained in our knowledge to such a level that it is hard to find just one example of it, because it is implied EVERYWHERE to such a level that is subconscious.It is like finding a site that explains that the colour blue is a colour that goes well with calm moments, because it is known Everywhere SUBCONSCIOUSLY and is stated everywhere SUBCONSCIOUSLY.Same with the tail end of the age of the Pharisees being 70.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

If it really was so well known, you should be able to find a single website to back it up. Just one. Anywhere.The fact that you don't seem to be able to seems to indicate that it is only "so well known" to you.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

It really is so well known as to be only known subconsciously. It is very difficult to find anything written on something is only known subconsciously.I have never seen anyone CONSCIOUSLY state that 70 is the tail end of the roman times of Jesus in Israel, but I have seen it stated SUBCONSCIOUSLY so many times.And thank you for implying that so many things are only so well known only to me!Yes there is a lot of things that most people don't have a clue about, that is only so well known to the create Eye of Blizzardbird.Thank you for your lexicological alchemy.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

It really is so well known as to be only known subconsciously. It is very difficult to find anything written on something is only known subconsciously.Except it isn't, and things that well known are written about.I have never seen anyone CONSCIOUSLY state that 70 is the tail end of the roman times of Jesus in Israel, but I have seen it stated SUBCONSCIOUSLY so many times.And how can one "subconsciously" state that a specific number was the average life expectancy during a given period of time?And thank you for implying that so many things are only so well known only to me!I hope that is mean to be sarcastic, or at least said with full knowledge of the sarcasm that had been direct at you.Yes there is a lot of things that most people don't have a clue about, that is only so well known to the create Eye of Blizzardbird.Yeah, clearly.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Do you know when you are going to die?Yes, you do.But only subconsciously.There are certain things we just can't put into words, yet we are aware of them.See what I mean by subconscious?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Do you know when you are going to die?No, I don't. Yes, you do.Nope. But only subconsciously.No.There are certain things we just can't put into words, yet we are aware of them.And this isn't one of them, so provide your evidence.See what I mean by subconscious?Yes: Something that contradicts the actual definition, like usual. I tire of this Humpty Dumpty behavior.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Your chemical properties within your brain enables you to know when you are going to die. You are biological capable of subconsciously knowing through the mechanics of both body and brain when you are going to die, but only subconsciously.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Your chemical properties within your brain enables you to know when you are going to die.Only in an incredibly limited number of situations, all of which involve the process of actively dying. I am not, and thus I can't tell. You are biological capable of subconsciously knowing through the mechanics of both body and brain when you are going to die, but only subconsciously.I would like to see even the smallest amount of scientific evidence for your claims.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

The evidence may be scientific, but it isn't just merely biological nor even chemical, it is mere physical as well.The evidence is also linked to the likes of gravity too as well potential and kinetic forces like light and other such forces.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Okay, now provide said evidence please, with a citation.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

If I were to cite it, I would be citing all thousands of articles.I had deduced it from all the articles combined.I could reference a single article, but it just wouldn't work on it's own.When the evidence of all the articles are put together the case is proven, but if I was site them all then that would be a hefty task.One internet site equals one.However when all the evidence is put together it starts to equal the full figure of of those thousand articles.1 does not equal 1000 when on it's own.But when 1 is multiplied with 1,000 it does.All those sites on their own do not merit evidence, but when they are all put together they do.It would be impossible to just cite even 100 of them and regard that as evidence in it's own merit, I would have to cite all 1,000 of them.1000 is just a rough figure, btw, the I don't know what the real exact number of articles is. For all I know it could be 300, or 500,000, I just don't quite know.It's all easier when putting all this stuff into words.Of course you can't put into words something unconscious WITHOUT delving into the scientific, that is what I had meant.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

If I were to cite it, I would be citing all thousands of articles.No you really wouldn't, you would simply need to cite one. Just one.I had deduced it from all the articles combined.Then provide some of the aspects you deduced it from.I could reference a single article, but it just wouldn't work on it's own.Then reference three. If you are unable to substantiate your claims, then there is no point in taking them seriously, and thus no point in taking you seriously.When the evidence of all the articles are put together the case is proven, but if I was site them all then that would be a hefty task.So you seem to be claiming that you and you alone look at all of this evidence and came up with this deduction, that nobody else has ever come up with. Am I correct?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

It would be impossible to just cite even 100 of them and regard that as evidence in it's own merit, I would have to cite all 1,000 of them.That is correct on your part, however. Good man.Indeed I am the only one who has come up with this excellent deduction.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

So, you are the only one in the world who has come up with this deduction, you are incapable of providing any evidence of this deduction, and, what, you expect me to just take your word for it? To take your claim serious despite no evident support or basis?
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

I can support it, but by words alone!I know how to, let me show you.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

He likes to multiply the answer by another number before he gives it.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

It only makes sense to multiply by 10 when you know Ali would have beat Jesus to a pulp.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Jesus Christ

Why do you seem to like Mohammed?He was a sociopathic liar.Of course he claims of being an expert boxer were all just lies.Jesus was the real king.He would go all over Ali and belt him to the floor.
Debate: Jesus Christ or prophet Muhammad, which one is more valuable?
Side: Muhammad

Why do you seem to like Mohammed?I liked him because of all the trash talking.He was a sociopathic liar.No he wasn't. He exaggerated quite a bit, but it was obvious that he couldn't do the stuff that he exaggerated, but it helped understand his ego.Of course he claims of being an expert boxer were all just lies.He was definitely a professional boxer. I am not sure he ever claimed to be an expert boxer. That's what is funny about all of his trash talking. He didn't say he was the best boxer, he said he floated like a butterfly and stung like a bee. It is the overwhelming majority of boxing experts who say Ali was one of the best boxers. Again, you may be thinking about how weak he looks today in his old age, but back in the 1960s and 70s he was very good.Jesus was the real king.Good thing he didn't get in the ring with Ali.He would go all over Ali and belt him to the floor.Well, yeah, if he fought Ali today. But, that's because Jesus can only beat up old people.