azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

True Atheism is an illogical belief system.I shall explain:Atheism comes from the Greek broken down into its parts of:Alpha negative - noTheos - GodSo Atheism literally means "there is no God"it does NOT mean "I don't think there is a God" or "I don't believe in a God"It literally means "there is no God"It affirms a universal negative.You may or may not know it, but it is impossible for you to affirm a universal negative.I will illustrate:I cannot say "There are no purple polka dotted stars in the universe"I can't make this statement because:A. I have not been everywhere in the universe simultaneously B. I am not OmnipresentC. I am not Omniscientso in order to affirm a universal negative, you must have supernatural knowledge and power.In other words, if you want to say "there is no God in this universe" you must be God.The literal Atheist is saying "I am a being with infinite knowledge declaring that there is no being with infinite knowledge in the universe."completely illogical.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

First of all, you can affirm a universal negative. Heck, I'll do it right now: there are no gods. What you're trying to say is that it's illogical or irrational to affirm a universal negative.Now, if affirming something meant that one were absolutely certain of it and believed that that there was no possible way one could be mistaken, you would be correct. But to make a statement does not imply absolute, unshakable belief in that statement, for which indeed omniscience is a logical prerequisite. It merely implies belief. I don't believe in any particular God because I don't see the evidence, and I don't believe in a nonspecific god simply because of Occam's Razor. Do I admit the possibility that I could be wrong? Of course; I always do. But until evidence shows up for which a god is the simplest explanation, I will assert that there are no gods.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

Clever, but unconvincing. Logical deduction is useful in math and other abstract formal systems, but does not apply to arguments in the real world. (Even the name "formal system" implies as much: it's a system where truth is based solely on the forms of the statements, not the truth of the propositions.)Or, if you prefer reductio ad absurdum:1. There are at least two religions with Gods who claim to be the only God.2. Denying the existence any God is affirming a universal negative, which is illogical.3. Therefore, multiple Gods, each of whom is the only one, cannot be denied.4. Absurd.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

The literal meaning of something has no impact on how it is interpreted today. The words cool and hot, for example, have meanings in some contexts that are totally different from their literal interpretations. True, there is no way to truly prove the nonexistence or existence of a divine creator either way, but atheism generally means the lack of belief in any organized religion.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

The existence of a god would only complicate things. It's an interesting idea, but I see no reason to assume that a god exists.The existence of whatever specific "God" the debate creator had in mind... certainly not.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

No, I don't believe in god(s)- at the same time, I don't think science disproves god(s), nor would the existence of god(s) disprove science. They are not exclusive. It's absolutely personal, and my idea is no.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

No, there's no evidence. Why not believe in pink unicorns as well? And teapots? And Santa? I guess these are all pretty cliche arguments, but why be content with not understanding the world when you can?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

No, I don't. I can ramble on about why but I'm not going to.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

If God created the universe. Then, who created God?It is not God who created man. But rather, it is man who created God.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

The entire premise of (modern day) god is based solely on a book -- bible, koran, torah; written by men and by today's standards, not educated and full of superstition. The bible is full of inaccuracies, incest, child abuse and wife beating. Umm, anything to do with the culture of their time at writing - maybe that was acceptable behavior? Also carbon dating is finding that the timelines of some events couldn't have happened. Church's have been able to prey on man's ignorance (and fear of death) by promoting this ridiculous fantasy in order for them to retain their power and fill the coffers.Science may not have all the answers yet. But they will one day. With religion -- how can you ever prove a negative? And more to the point, what is wrong with us that we need to rely on the abstract to get through life? Why can't we just be at one with our beautiful planet, our family and our friends and live life within the mores of our culture.We mock the greeks and romans for their gods, but thousands of years later, we are still doing the same thing and thousands are being killed behind it! Ignorance is a terrible disease.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

The finality of death is the coldest truth one must face. Religion makes the perfect distraction. – Anonymous
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

No, I don't.But does anyone else feel like this should be a perspective debate?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

It can never come down to what you can prove, as no, of course we cannot prove the existence of a higher being. As for the 'Yes' side of the argument, you must agree otherwise there would be no need for 'faith' or 'belief'. As for the 'No' side of the argument, we cannot sit here and say that there is absolutely no 'God(s)', for there is no proof for that either. Hopefully, people aren't choosing to not believe based on a 'feeling' or a hunch, but by logic and lack proof for religion based 'facts'. You cannot say there is a God any more than you can say that the universe is floating in a giant mug of tea, It's just extremely unlikely. This is not in any means to be taken as a strictly agnostic view, for it is ridiculous to place yourself directly between the Yes and No. In conclusion to my argument, Do I believe in God? No, because its highly unlikely that a god exists.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I want to believe in a creator, that someone that cares, but i can't.If he/it does exist than he either doesn't care or is a sadistic being, akin to the kid with a magnifying glass. Its that or he's dead... so I'm going with he doesn't exist.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

There are sciences that may perhaps prove a higher being existence, and there are sciences that disprove a higher beings existence. Science must be logical and must not have contradictions or "holes" in it's explanations. Religions may have several contradictions however still sustains a proper explanation with no proof. This is the reason science is held superior to religion. Religion is mostly something to put hope into, a reason to live, and also, it is something that explains humans. For example, why we are superior, or why we have a "soul". Science may only provide us theories on this. At the moment, God and the lack of God may be proven, and until we develop enough technology and understandings of the universe and such, we cannot prove that God does or does not exist completely. It is simply up the the individual to decide this.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I have to add one more point. You all know that Santa Claus or the tooth fairy do not exist. Yet you do not see the correlation between a belief in god and a belief in santa claus.As children, our minds are very malleable, children believe in magic and fairies and anything that his parents tell him, because he doesn't have the skills to question at such a young age.Don't you see that this is exactly how your beliefs came about? then it was cemented by going to churches like the catholic church, who do a pretty good job with their form of brain washing.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: YES!!

You're comparing the creation of life to the belief in Santa Clause. Get a grip.Your beliefs in sciences are just as imaginary whether you like it or not. (Science has been proven to be subjective. Just sayin)
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

You're comparing the creation of life to the belief in Santa Clause.No, he/she is comparing the creation of life at the hands of a bearded man in the sky... to the belief of Santa Claus.Your beliefs in sciences are just as imaginary whether you like it or not.Sure, but the difference is that we use a logical process of gathering information and analyzing it to get our answers. What do you do? Sit in a pretty building and listen to some celibate man talk about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I hope you can recognize the fact that such an action, followed by belief in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, is a breach in common sense, yes?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I don't believe, but i used to. I came to a point that i should choose one: rationality or dedication. I chose the former. Because i could quantitatively observe, explain and experience the life without god. So the idea of god seemed an unnecessary assumption.The real question, in my opinion, should be: Is the concept of god can be reduced to a scientific level? But i guess it is an irrelevant topic for this debate :)
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

There are untold numbers of gods and supernatural beliefs in the dustbin of history. Other than tradition and culture, there is nothing the contemporary gods bring to the table. Religion is a tool for tribal management. God is just a concept operating within that framework. It's a hilarious side note that tribes continue to use their successes as evidence that their god is real. The study of religions and why people adopt belief in god is both very interesting and illuminating.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I question the existence of one as viewed by the mainstream religions.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I don't believe in Gods in the supernatural sense, mainly because I don't believe in the supernatural.I think that all the supposed "Gods" throughout history were actually either Extraterrestrials, or Extra-dimensional beings, and that all the religions in the world today are just based on the interpretations of primitive humans who really didn't understand any of it themselves.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

No substantial proof to argue a deity's existence. Therefore the default position is not to believe it.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I believe in the universe and everything in it, so yes, I believe in God.But, this 'God' I believe in isn't a monotheistic deity, so my vote is no.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

If the god want all humans in this world acknowledge his existence, then why doesn't he come until now? is he afraid? or is it coz he really doesn't exist? perhaps he doesn't exist...i'd like to see all things i've ever seen in this world labeled 'Made in heaven' (if he really exists) i don't wanna see a giant standing on clouds saying 'hi everyone! i'm jesus christ!!:D'
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

i don't really care with believing in god. i think we just need to act good everyday or precisely, in our entire life. like helping each other, never tell a lie, never steal somethin', never kill anyone, etc.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Don't have imaginary friends, sorry.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I believe the knowledge of Gods existence is unknowable as long as I am living. So for the time being I don't.What I'm saying is I'm an Agnostic-Atheist.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Their is no proof of a god , so why should i believe something I'm not even sure exists?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I do not believe in god. I have found no evidence supporting his existence. I have also found lots of places where science and the bible disagree, and I believe the rational and logical thing to do is to give up religion instead of giving up science.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

I have also found lots of places where science and the bible disagree, and I believe the rational and logical thing to do is to give up religion instead of giving up science.1. Why are you equating the veracity of a god's existence the veracity of religion?2. Why are you equating the veracity of any religion to the veracity of Christianity?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

1. Why are you equating the veracity of a god's existence the veracity of religion?My point is the same, there is no evidence that I am aware of that supports god's existence. 2. Why are you equating the veracity of any religion to the veracity of Christianity?In that phrase I may have falsely assumed this debate was about the god of the abrahamic religions. You can pick any religion you want in the world, and there isn't going to be much if any evidence supporting that god's existence.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

What to you is evidence of god's existence? Or have you created criteria that one could never hope to fulfill so that you could take the intellectually lazy way and rub in how "you can't prove god with my criteria for evidence... nah na na na nah."What would be evidence for a religions' veracity? You have indicates your view that religion contradicts science, yet Hindu cosmology and astronomy fit very well together, this given Hindu cosmology was posited over a thousand years before the first telescope. (This is just one example).
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

What to you is evidence of god's existence? Or have you created criteria that one could never hope to fulfill so that you could take the intellectually lazy way and rub in how "you can't prove god with my criteria for evidence... nah na na na nah."I'm not sure why you imply that I've taken the second option. I don't have a set criteria for what is and what is not evidence for god's existence. I take a "I'll judge it when I see it" approach to it. What would be evidence for a religions' veracity? You have indicates your view that religion contradicts science, yet Hindu cosmology and astronomy fit very well together, this given Hindu cosmology was posited over a thousand years before the first telescope. (This is just one example).Do you have a source for Hindu cosmology/astronomy being in agreement with science? Even if it were, how does this verify that the Hindu religion is correct or true?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I have never been shown any evidence of the existence of any gods or goddesses. So, no.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I do not believe in gods for same reason that I do not believe in tooth fairy or flying pigs...
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

ALl the question asks is do I. All I will give is an answer.Not entirely.What is with all of the disputes and and supports?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Majority of religion are just cults feeding off of pathetic people who have nothing to hope for but a fictitious character who will lead them to a fake place of goodness. Anybody who belongs to a religion such as the Catholic church is a complete idiot who doesn't deserve to have respect due to their undying stupidity and faith to the obviously impossible. Fuck!I am seething with rage as I click to submit this.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

I do not believe in God because it is absurd to think that in order to enter some type of "heaven" you must live a life that doesn't allow you to eat fat (Leviticus 3:17 'It is a perpetual statute throughout your generations in all your dwellings: you shall not eat any fat or any blood.'), restricts your clothing choices (Leviticus 19:19 "You are to keep My statutes. You shall not breed together two kinds of your cattle; you shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor wear a garment upon you of two kinds of material mixed together."), and doesn't allow men to shave their beard! (Leviticus 19:27 "You shall not round off the side-growth of your heads nor harm the edges of your beard.") What's more, this is a religion that has caused MILLIONS to die! It seems to me like it would be a monstrosity to have to believe in a god (not just the christian one) where they would justify killing others and undermine other people for believing in something other than their God. I realize that not every Christian thinks this way, however it doesn't excuse the ones who do. I see religion as another wall that separates people from people. It's merely another reason that some people use to create differences between people that are not needed.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Science books teach evolution because it s real not fake real real
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Not at all.
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

A lot of people say that Darwin's theory (which has a huge pool of evidence to back it up unlike god and the bible) takes more faith to believe in than the bible or any religion for that matter. A invisible man in the sky makes more sense then change over time....
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

God is just an invention by humans to control the masses (though initially, to provide a temporary answer to unexplained things until they were explained)
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Wife: "How would you describe me?" Husband: "ABCDEFGHIJK." Wife: "What does that mean?" Husband: "Adorable, beautiful, cute, delightful, elegant, fashionable, gorgeous, and hot." Wife: "Aw, thank you, but what about IJK?" Husband: "I'm just kidding!"
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

There was a preacher who fell in the ocean and he couldn't swim. When a boat came by, the captain yelled, "Do you need help, sir?" The preacher calmly said "No, God will save me." A little later, another boat came by and a fisherman asked, "Hey, do you need help?" The preacher replied again, "No God will save me." Eventually the preacher drowned & went to heaven. The preacher asked God, "Why didn't you save me?" God replied, "Fool, I sent you two boats!"
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

Answer this question: if God created the Earth, and humans and animals not long after, then why were there no humans when dinosaurs existed?
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: Yes!!

why were there no humans when dinosaurs existed?BECAUSE THE DINOSAURS ATE THEM ALL YOU DUMMY!! THEN GOD PUNISHED THE DINOSAURS FOR BEING NAUGHTY WITH A BIG COSMIC METEORITE TO THE DOME! THEN HE PUT THE PEOPLE BACK. WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT??
Debate: Do you believe in God?
Side: No!!

YOUR WRONG CAUSE THEY ARE NOT INVISIBLE. YOU CAN SEE THEM IF U BELIEVE IN THEM LIKE I HAVE AND ALL THE OTHER GODS AREN'T REAL THEY ARE JUST PEOPLE BUT THE CHRISTIAN GOD IS VERY DIFFERENT.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Yes, I believe in God.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH MY NAME IS GUUTARDOGE AND JESUS IS MY SAVIOR DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH JESUS LOVES ME THIS I KNOW FOR THE BIBLE TELLS ME SO DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Yes,I beleive in god because if there was no creator(god) there would have been no creation(world).
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Poor argument that can't even stand as evidence, much less proof. It only works if you believe in God in the first place. You haven't established that the World (by the way, the "word" world usually means planet, and our planet makes up WAAAAY less than 1% of the known universe, so you are pretty much short-changing God's proposed creation) is by necessity a product of intelligence or supernatural activity. Can you do that without falling into tautology?
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

So name something intelligent that was created from something unintelligent.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

The list of intelligent things isn't too big. There's human, possibly dolphins, whales, arguably some apes. Maybe some computer programs. Only that last category would count as something created by intelligence that we know. I don't see your point.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

The list of intelligent things isn't too big.Apparently you're going off of a different definition than I am. I mean intelligent, as in something that is aware. Any living creature, really. The list is huge.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

Apparently you're going off of a different definition than I am. I was thinking along the lines of creative and abstract thinking. I assumed that was what you were going for since you were trying to draw a connection here to such a creative force. I mean intelligent, as in something that is aware. Any living creature, really.No, just vertebrates. Anyway, my answer to your question is the first one. And that happened way the hell after the birth of the universe.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Anyway, my answer to your question is the first one. And that happened way the hell after the birth of the universe.Why does that matter? Whatever caused the Big Bang introduced the necessary ingredients, so to speak, for life to exist.If I plant a seed, I don't say that it took too long for it to become a tree, therefore the tree must not have been implied within the seed. In a single seed, you have the implication of the tree trunk, branches, leaves and more seeds (fruit, acorns, berries, flowers, etc. It depends on the tree). One tiny seed can imply so many different things.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

May I borrow your statement? .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Sure
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

Thanks. :)
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

really poor argument .
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

God is everything.He created us to live in this world.for eg: the earth wouldnot have supported life
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: no,I don't beleive in god

They earth supports life right now. Life which is testable and apparent. God is neither of these things. We can tell you how life works, how it is chemistry made up entirely of substances found in other, non-living, aspects of our planet. We cannot even prove God's existence, much less how he functions and does things like creating life.
Debate: DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD
Side: yes, I believe in god

What if science is proving the existence of "God" and we don't even realize it?