azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

He's not asking about the Bible, he is making accusations. He picked up some garbage somewhere, and is not interested in what the Bible really says or he would find for himself the correct Biblical teaching on Hell. It's not hard to find.And as for you, you too need to be saved from Hell. When I write these things, it is with little hope that you will repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ because you have made it pretty clear that you think you are good so you don't have to care much what Christ did for you when He died for your sins to save you from Hell, to justify you by His resurrection if you will believe on Him. You see, you are responding to things I addressed to another person; another person who has made it pretty clear they are as obstinate as yourself. I write these things more for the people I have no idea are reading them. I'm well enough aware of my faults and weaknesses, and I know I deserve to die and burn in Hell forever as one who has gone against God; the same as you and everybody else. Yet God Himself died in my place as the Son sent by the Father, and having believed on Him, He now lives in my by His Holy Spirit, making me a child of God, and one day I will be forever changed to be perfect like Jesus, with Him, for Him, by Him, forever in Heaven where I will serve Him gladly.I hold little hope of getting anything out of you other than animosity, like most of the people who argue with me. You, Bohemian, Smilingbog.....you three come across to me as nothing but bitter, using insults as argument as if proving I have faults makes you as good as me so you can't go to Hell if I'm saved from it. It does not work that way, you have to obtain pardon from God through the blood of His Son. Between you and God is your sin, not mine. You need God's forgiveness for your sins, and He paid for them with His own blood so you don't have to pay in Hell if you will believe on Him and receive Him by faith as your Savior.A. Admit you have sinned against God and deserve His punishment for breaking His law after He gave you lifeB. Believe Jesus is God the Son who died in your place and rose from the dead offering you forgiveness for the sins which caused Him to die....your sins.C. Call on God the Father in the name of God the Son and ask Him to save you from Hell, agree with God that only He can save you and invite Jesus in to your life as your Savior now and forever.You, sir, or ma'am based on your alter-gender profile, will probably do nothing in response to these words other than to criticize me, continuing in the pride of your sin. I really do not write these things for you when I am responding to your post because I know your attitude. This is written for the person I don't know is watching, the one who wants to be saved from Hell, and even if none ever see it and believe, God knows I still tried to tell them according to His word and He knows I tried to tell you and what are you going to say when you stand before Him on Judgement Day?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So Sheol burns with fire of Hell. The fire of God's wrath burns to the lowest Sheol if you must use the word Sheol there. It's still fire. It's Hell if you call it Sheol or not.If you want to do a Bible study, I can show you how Sheol is used at times speaking of Hell which burns with fire and brimstone and at times speaking of the grave. Obviously in Deut. 32:22 it is referring to Hell.The only way to take the fire out of Hell in the Torah or in the rest of the Bible is to bury your head in the sand and pretend the fire is not going to burn your hiney.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Most social scientists are like you, on their way to Hell.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Your behavior is becoming more and more childlike as time goes on, but it will all be over soon
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

..........................................................................................................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Are you going to murder me?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

He does tend to give that vibe.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You are already dead in your sins. You are in the first death, dying as a sinner, on your way to the second death in the Lake of Fire with no countdown of time in your dying.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You are opposing your own life, insisting you do not need God's pardon to be saved from Hell.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

"We can even explain how and when the thoracic changes occurred, and in what species. I have a nice video of this process as well."Correction: you can explain how you believe the changes occurred and in what species you believe the change happened. That is not science, it is a hypothesis which believing does not prove.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

That article only points out the differences in hearts in different kinds of animals. That is not proof of evolution....and using "damn" as emphasis for your argument sounds like you are insecure in the facts and are trying to overpower differing opinions by forceful speech. In a court of law, using language that way can be considered as abuse, emotional assault. To me, it's fighting words, not intellectual discussion, not civil discourse, and lacking in intellectual strength or moral character and I don't want to fight with you...I think we got past that.A pile of bones is a pile of bones. Calling it "transitional" is inserting belief. Museums dedicated to presenting fossils as if they prove the morphing only seen in animations really happened and dishonest. Can't they find extinct species interesting without inserting evolutionary belief?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Fossils can form in a wide variety of ways. Some common methods include:The body can leave an impression or mold showing its outer shape in the surrounding sand or mud. This can include footprints and the inside and outside of shells. With the right ingredients and conditions, the mold can harden quickly, like cement.Petrification takes place when minerals replace the original material of the plant or animal. These petrified fossils must form quickly, before the body parts have time to decay. Petrified wood is a classic example.Permineralization, or encased fossilization, occurs when dissolved minerals fill the pores and empty spaces in the plant or animal but don’t replace any of the original material. The chemicals then turn into crystals, keeping the organism safe and preserved. While it is possible for many different chemicals to do this, quartz is the most common. Most dinosaur bones are permineralized.Fossils can form under all kinds of conditions all over the world. While water and dissolved minerals are usually needed to form the three types of fossils above, many processes—coalification, compression, freezing, desiccation (drying out), to name a few—do not require either.Though there are numerous ways to make fossils, fossilization is somewhat rare today. Why is that?God created the world to efficiently recycle organic matter. When something dies, scavengers, fungi (like mushrooms), and/or bacteria normally consume it. This process of decomposition leaves nothing behind to fossilize.However, massive catastrophes like Noah’s Flood would produce the conditions necessary to quickly bury and protect creatures so that they can fossilize. It appears that God wanted to leave abundant evidence of His past judgment of mankind’s sin.While scientists are still trying to sort out the complex details about fossilization, one fact is undisputed—it can be amazingly fast.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

selective inheritance is the driving force of racial superiority. It's why us whites dropped our tails quicker than the blacks, so they are better at basketball and we are smarter. Just kidding.....but really, this is what evolution leads to and it was crucial when Derwin popularized belief in evilootion.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Evolution is actually a combination of SEVERAL SCIENCES.Including: Biology; Chemistry; Anthropology; Zoology; Botany; Geology; Genetics; and physiology.And guess what? They ALL AGREE on Evolution. The fact is so prevalent in those sciences that we don't even discuss the matter, if it's true or not. We take it for granted becasue of all the decades and mountains of evidence. None of which is EVER disputed successfully. We take Evolution as matter-of-fact as, say, a chemist would when examining water, in saying that it is H20.And a theory is MORE than just a fact! It is a collection of facts that have all been tried and proven and observed time and again.So.........Evolution = More than One Science. All those sciences (about 10 different disciplines) agree on Evolution.There has NEVER been a proven discovery that refutes Evolution. Or even questions it. The only thing the nay-sayers--of which there are virtually NONE outside of the Church--can do is ask us why we cannot explain some fact. Never mind that we HAVE explained about 98% of Evolution. All we have left really is to figure out Abiogenesis. And so, the only thing the naysayers HAVE is that. So they say god did it.Which of course is absurd and is a total cop-out.There is so very much evidence for Evolution that the only reason a person would disagree with it is because their superstitions, err, their religions, tell them they need to.NO man of science today disagrees with it. It simply is. not. done.Hope this helps.SS
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Comeon, Slappy, if you really want people to respect you as a scientist, you need to be honest. I think you are well aware that the inventor of the MRI machine which revolutionized modern medicine as well as inventions used in satellites which could not function without his invention is a man who is a true scientist, highly accomplished, and highly respected in the scientific community....and is a young earth Creationist. I can present a list of dozens if not hundreds of similar accomplished and respected scientists. Your assertion:"There is so very much evidence for Evolution that the only reason a person would disagree with it is because their superstitions, err, their religions, tell them they need to.NO man of science today disagrees with it. It simply is. not. done.Hope this helps.SS"IS A FLAT OUT LIE!!!!!! A scientist is supposed to deal in observable facts, and your dishonesty in this kind of stuff casts doubt on your character. To me it says you are desperate to cling to evolutionary belief. You have made statements like this many times, and it shows you really are trying to fool yourself and seem to be succeeding by the way you refuse to trust God and hide behind your faciasde of evolution.In evolution, you are abusing the word theory to describe belief, a hypothesis. It is completely unnecessary for science. You can't show me anything in science dependent on evolutionary belief. All scientific observation and study needs no belief in evolution. The only thing you need to believe in evolution for is to support your hope of escaping reality in death while you excuse yourself for inventing whatever morality seems to fit your wants at any given moment.And there are many proven discoveries which refute evolution, I can show you dozens. You will have to do all kinds of mental contortions and avoidance of facts to brush them aside. I have offered to present you such lists of scientists and facts which dispute evolution many times, I have posted many of them and provided links which lead to dozens or hundreds of these things. Evolutionary belief has science cornered only behind the wall of your mind which you set up trying to block God out, and all you are doing is blocking yourself out from life hoping in death for relief.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

The true professional scientist with a Master's degree or higher level of education who believes believes in Creation is very rare.About the same percentage of those who suffer from mental illness.That is...maybe one in a couple hundred!?What does this tell you?Especially when you couple it with the f act that any psychiatrist will tell you religious delusions are one of the mist common symptoms of psychosis!http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_proof.htm
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I'm sorry man, you are not a scientist, you are an evolutionist, a religious zealot proclaiming freedom of sexual immorality.You yourself are proof that God is the giver of life, you don't get life from non-living things, if you think you do you are not a scientist but a believer in the hypothesis of naturalism which goes without real evidence. How you can say your life is not a documented fact proving God gives life is only in lunacy believing life rose from matter and intelligence came from nowhere.Apparently you have made a career out of building a wall trying to keep God out of your life and there is only one reason for doing that....it's because you love your sin more than life and don't want God involved because He demands you be against your sin. Since you will not be against your sin, God will be against you and guess what you get? You don't get out in evolution. Too bad for you I guess, but it's good for me because God is good, life means God is good, evolution means life is meaningless. You can have your confusion since you seem to love it so much.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

you need to recant your statement asserting that no scientists disagree with your evolutionary views. This partial admission is only an insult and not an admission. Psychiatrists who believe in evolution are deluded, and their opinion of scientists based on the scientists rejection of belief in evolution is irrelevant.All you are doing is trying to justify your own denial of objective morals so you feel whatever you want to do at any given moment is justified. By refusing to recognize highly accomplished and respected scientists who reject evolution, insulting them by saying they are all deluded only reflects on your own character, your own insecurity. I understand you feel challenged in morality so it is important to you to smear every person who believes in objective morals and objective value and purpose of life. Evolution is a cheap excuse for condoning immorality, and it won't excuse you in Judgement Day. You wont' get out of being you in death, everything you have ever said, thought, done, everywhere you ever went, is on your record and dying does not get you out of it, you will stand before God in judgement and answer for it all, and if you are not covered by the blood of Jesus Christ who paid for your sins, His blood you trample will testify against you and you will be rejected by Him in death as you reject Him from life, and I won't tell you where that will get you because you know and you don't want to be told and don't care.......
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

The man who invented the MRI machine is not sexually immoral. Indulgence in sexual immorality shows mental illness as the deviant devalues his or her body giving it away for less than it's worth, often resulting in depression and suicide which may or may not include STD's. Dawkins condones a lot of perversion. To imply the man who invented the MRI machine is mentally ill or deluded is dishonest, cheap, non-scientific, and when you do things like that it casts doubt on your own character making you look like somebody who can't be trusted. Maybe nobody in your evolutionary circles has the backbone to question the veracity of the people who shove evolution down your throat and threaten to black ball you if you don't comply. That only means your class is a bunch of spineless weasels and because you have real fighting spirit I think you are better than them though you insist you want to be one of them forever. They're teacher's pet wimps and you are sucking up to them.......just a plain shame.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

And you claim to be free of mental illness while you are bring home crack whores and cursing God, and getting drunk to bury your hopelessness in futility of death?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

How is it apes are still in zoos ? They should evolved already !
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

How is it Americans came from England, but there are still English people....
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Evolution does not state we evolved from apes, but rather apes and human share an ape-like ancestor
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Evolution is a belief which excludes contradictory data in SEVERAL SCIENCES. People who believe in evolution agree that all contradictory data should be ignored.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

What data contradicts evolution?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Why should I waste my time with your whiney mouth? If you want to know, look it up yourself, it's very easy to do.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Cant even name one shred of data? Shame. Unfortunately i know your arguments and its all just doubting the evidence of evolutionary theory rather than presenting original data.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

If you know my arguments, why don't you post them and show what is wrong with them? You're just a jerk, that's why I'm not answering you.....and I doubt you know half of the things I would present because I doubt you have done any serious research on the subject.....maybe you have a pet list preferred by evolutionists as things they can put enough confusion into so they pretend to answer.....You're just a jerk, asking me to provide data and then claiming you know the data I would provide.......and listen, idiot, if the data is factual and casts doubt on evolution, then evolution can only be counted as a hypothesis and not a theory. You say you know the facts that cast doubt on evolution........facts stand, evolution is a belief contrary to facts.....and you are a jerk for playing this stupid game with me, and by simple logic you lost the game anyways.All you are doing is trying to convince yourself that you have the right to exist outside of Hell because your life is justified. Obviously your life is not justified or you would not be dying, obviously you do not have the right to exist outside of Hell....it's just a privilege given by God for a time if you will not repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ to be saved from Hell where apparently you must wake up before you believe sinners do not have the right to be outside of it.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You're just a jerk, asking me to provide data and then claiming you know the data I would provide.......and listen, idiot, if the data is factual and casts doubt on evolution, then evolution can only be counted as a hypothesis and not a theory. You say you know the facts that cast doubt on evolution........facts stand, evolution is a belief contrary to facts.....and you are a jerk for playing this stupid game with me, and by simple logic you lost the game anyways.You are a foul mouthed excuse for a Christian arent you? Well nevermind. You know what would happen if I read evidence against evolution? I might change my view on evolution. You know how that would affect my life? Not at all. I have no bias to believe in evolution. It seems like the theory that best fits the data and if it turns out its false then... big deal.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I think you got the message. Your sin separates you from God and condemns you to Hell. Jesus died for you to save you from Hell. He rose from the dead to justify all who repent of their sins and believe on Him. I guess you think you are good to go to heaven, so go ahead and find out how good you really are. Why your dying does not tell you that you are no good at all is beyond me.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Evolution. Was the topic.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Will you ever stop crying "wolf!"? ....................................
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I agree with this, as well, 'trag.It's like Dawkins says, "I would be willing to re-think Evolution in a minute, and even doubt it, if only one piece of verifiable evidence arose that refuted it. Or even discredited it in the least. Such as ONE fossil found ONE time in the wrong strata of earth, that did not coincide with its indicated age. But this has never happened!"I feel the same way!Saint once asked me why Evolution is so imprtant to me. Answer is: it is NOT! LOL. I just take it as a mundane and common fact, as I do that the Earth revolves around the Sun, or that the sky is blue because of what we call Rayleigh Scattering.Its when deluded people attack my science and try to foist their silly delusions on us that the whole thing becomes worth discussing. Otherwise, among us here at school and also 90% of anybody in the country with a college degree, there is no need to ever argue the obvious. We prefer more controversial and debatable topics. Evolution, to the learned and rational, is not even debatable. It is simple fact.SS
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

why don't you post them and show what is wrong with them?Done.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

All that is important is showing what is wrong with you, so maybe you will realize that only God can fix you. You're a sinner who needs to be changed to be like your Creator so you can be with Him in Heaven forever, and only He can make that change in you when you receive Him as your Savior....but you love your sin more than life, don't you, and you hope evolution makes you exempt from Hell so you do not have to be subject to moral law, don't you?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

The facts I would post are not debated but rather ignored by evolutionary scientists.I would not post the set of facts which evolutionists fool themselves into thinking their way of looking at the data to fit their beliefs is better than how the data fits into the Biblical model of reality. There is a strong censorship in the evolutionary educational community, an insecurity which avoids allowing those who do not believe in evolution to take the lead in the discussions.....they do this by repeatedly stating their own beliefs and spending a lot of time and money keeping the focus on following their teaching while ignoring facts and data which show their beliefs are not dealing with reality. I will not do the homework for you to show you the data and facts, you can find them easily if you want to....just google something like "scientific data and facts which counter evolution and big bang beliefs". There are so many things available, if you find a good website which presents some of this stuff which is forbidden in secular science classrooms, even that good website will only hit on a tenth of the items. People like you want you keep your head in the sand, so why should I try to pull it out when you repeatedly indicate you will only shove your head in that some old hole deeper than before afraid you wont' be able to keep God behind the wall you have set up in your darkened mind and you will have to answer to Him for your sins.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I would not post the set of facts which evolutionists fool themselves into thinking their way of looking at the dataExactly - the reference doesn't list evolutionist claims - it posts the claims of the ignorant such as yourself (actually far less ignorant than you), and then debunks them.Claims that you repeatedly (and erroneously) make like mutations don't add information, macroevolution is different than micro, no transition fossils, etc. etc. have long been addressed (the site was last updated about 10 years ago.)
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Well I hate to say it but Artrag makes an excellent point.You cannot offer any documented facts or evidence or discoveries that deny evolution. Or even throw doubts at it. All you guys can do is give us your arguments of incredulity. And say we fake our findings. But we have given mountains of evidence!So how about one shred if evidence for creation? There is none, outside of your Bible stories.Nothing contradicts evolution except your Bible.Period.