Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

I appreciate your thorough response. You and I appear to possess a similar knowledge set as nothing you posted was new to me. However I disagree with your assessment of the information. The chances of something happening become irrelevant the instant that something actually happens. No matter how unlikely an occurrence appears to be the fact that it happened shows that it was in the realm of possibility. All it took was the right elements being in the right place at the right time. When we say the chances of something happening are low, what we are really saying is that it is uncommon for all of those elements to actually be at the right place at the right time. But once those elements start coming together, the odds start changing. At this exact moment I am inside on a clear day in the middle of winter. Thus the chances that I will get hit by lightning right now are essentially 0. Fast forward to summer and stick me outside in a thunderstorm. Now the chances are still technically pretty low but have become high enough that it is a legitimate concern and I will promptly get myself indoors. This is kind of like chemical reactions. The number of reactions that an atom can have with other atoms is always FAR less than the number it cannot have, so it would seem that the chances of the element having any reactions at all are quite low. But all that needs to happen to change the odds is to introduce large quantities of an element that our initial atom is capable of bonding with. And if you form a molecule, the rules of the game may have changed substantially. Each constituent atom helps define the boundaries of possibility for the whole. That molecule may now be capable of things that were not possible with the independent atoms. Look at table salt: sodium chloride. Sodium is a metal and chlorine is poisonous. Neither of these elements are things I would advise you to put on your french fries. But put them together and they become an edible and delicious additive. The rules for table salt are different than the rules for sodium or for chlorine. And as things build and get more complex, the rules keep changing. Complexity is interesting because on the one hand it is logically harder to maintain a complex structure, but on the other hand the range of possibilities available to the whole increase. As long as the interactions foster integrity, the item will hold itself together. If the interactions foster change, the item will change. And more complex items don't just have a greater variety of things that can happen to them, they also may have a greater variety of things that they can do to other items. Once you get this cause-and-effect ball rolling, you create little pockets of increased possibility. It doesn't matter that most of space is essentially nothing, the areas that ARE something can have a wide variety of different things in a tiny area. The odds for any given thing happening increase dramatically when you get a whole bunch atoms and molecules together in the same space. When you say that the odds of any of things that you mentioned happening are small, you are speaking from more of a universal standpoint than from a local one, and seem to be implying that odds don't change. The next thing you need to remember is that the universe is a vast playground of possibility. If space was as small as the Old Testament seems to suggest, than you would be totally correct in assuming that all these things would be hard pressed to occur. But we have more space to work with than we can even comprehend. We also have a vast scale of time here too. There are more stars than we know about right now, and there have been many that have come and gone well before you and I were born. It may be that ours is the only one where everything ended up being exactly right for life as we know it to occur, but even the most finite odds are given room to breathe in such a vast collection of space and time.Implying that God had to do all of this just because the odds are low or the complexity is high is nothing more than jumping to a conclusion. It is a possibility, sure. But it is not incontrovertible evidence. It made more sense when humans didn't have the means to answer most of the questions we had. But the more we understand the universe around us, the less we need the intellectual placeholder of faith. As with you, I could go on beyond this, but this will have to suffice for now.