Debate: Should the use of guns be prohibited in America?
Side: NO

It seems you started to write a response, but instead vomited on your keyboard in a way that helps my argument. Cheap, but fortuitous.  Why ? When you totally ignore or avoid answering what I've said on this matter ?I’m assuming the “why” was in response to my request that you actually debate. I haven’t ignored what you’ve had to say, it just never included any substance. If I am wrong, I am sure you can copy and paste something you said that mattered and I will responded to it. Re -read what I said in my previous post about worldwide gun ownership as you seem to ignore what suits youMost of what you actually said appears to have been typed by a retarded monkey. I am not going to re-read your stupid shit in the hopes of finding a gem. Copy and paste it.Wrong again this debate is about gun ownership in the US this is you re - phrasing the question to force your pointWhen I literally copied and pasted the title of the debate, that was the opposite of re-phrasing the question. Go ask your helper.Again you say my point is moot so failing to address legitimate opposition to your view hurts your argumentWe aren’t deciding whether to introduce guns as you pretend. We are deciding whether to ban them. I’ll just refer you to the topic title rather than pasting it here. Also, using my line because you are too unoriginal actually make you look about as smart as Dermot.There may be so many easy ways to accomplish suicide but a gun is the easy option making it a gun issue which you're merely trying to avoidSuicide itself is done in a number of ways. It is a mental health issue. If a person is going to hang themselves, but they can’t find a rope, they will find another way to do it. This applies to guns as well. If you take away one means, another will be sought. That’s because the means is not the issue, the goal (suicide) is the issue.As for injury and accident by gun, the rate of this was much higher before the introduction of Hunters Safety Course as a requirement to get a hunting license. A near elimination of what used to be a real problem is a success story for education. I actually talked about school shootings as well as mass shootings so is that really your defence?School shootings are merely a specific kind of mass shooting. Cherry picking gun violence would have worked better for you if you focused on Gang violence, as I am sure the US well above and beyond other nations. Nonetheless, it would have still been cherry picking. You can focus on school shootings and say how bad it is, perhaps I’ll focus on office building shootings to appear to minimize the problem. We would both be cherry picking.If a country has a higher level of mass or school shootings guns should not be banned in the US ?If another country has a high rate of mass shootings and they have very tight restrictions on firearms, then my point is made. Guns are not the issue. Violence finds a way, even gun violence. No , the debate concerns the banning of firearms in the US ...Ok , stick to the question as asked then failing to do so hurts your argument .Suicide by gun is indeed a gun issue or are you missing something here ?Most of this appears to be your vomit issue. I address the suicide aspect earlier in this post. I thought you might be able to comprehend what the question asked but I was wrong as you seem to think yet again it's about where the US ranks in a list whys that ?Your failure to utilize basic of analysis necessary to comprehend the relevance of sources to subjects is not a reason to forego the use of sources. If I show US states by legal gun ownership, and then show US states by violent crime, you can see that there is no correlation or (in some cases) negative correlation between gun ownership and crime. I know this might all seem irrelevant to the subject from your perspective, but your stupidity is not my problem.As for your cherry-picked comparisons of school shootings by nation, school shootings are rare, albeit tragic, events. I’m not sure why you think this means guns should be banned. Illicit drugs kills more kids than guns do, and they are banned. In fact, youth deaths have only gotten worse as drug laws have grown. Alcohol kills more kids than guns do, but no one wants alcohol prohibition. Why the inconsistency? Gun ownership and gun deaths negatively correlate over time. According to Dept. of Justice statistics, from 1993 to 2011, gun homicide decreased 39% while nonfatal firearm crimes decreased 69%. During the same time period, guns sales increased nationally. Rare events notwithstanding.