azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Abortion is the deliberate ending of a pregnancy at an early stage. mmh people a child is a gift from God.what right do you as a person have to actually abort this child.AND THEN SOMEONE SAYS ABORT THIS CHILD IF YOU WERE RAPED WOW JUST SHOCKING.YES YOU WERE RAPED BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN ABORT THE CHILD.YES THE CHILD IS A REMINDER OF THAT HORRIFIC INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED TO YOU,WHY PUNISH THE CHILD FOR THE FATHERS SINS,THE RAPER.ABORTING A CHILD IS THE SAME AS KILLING THE CHILD YOU ARE NO BETTER THAN THE PERSON THAT RAPED YOU AND IMPREGNATED YOU,YOU JUST COMMITTING THE SAME CRIME AS HIM. THINK ABOUT THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN BUT ARE INFERTILE CAN'T YOU AT LEAST GIVE THE CHILD UP FOR ADOPTION BUT THEN YOU WILL SEE WHEN THE CHILD COMES HOW MUCH JOY THE CHILD WILL BRING IN YOUR LIFE
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

To me, abortion is just MURDER!!!!!!!! I understand that there may be certain circumstances where an abortion would a much safer option for both the mother and the baby. Rape victims; you should kill an unborn child just because it was literally forced upon. There are so many couples who can't have babies, who would be more than happy to adopt that child. For underage teenagers, I don't care what you may think of me, but you should not be out there having unprotected sex. You know that sex=babies. You should be focused on your studies, not focused on screwing. Period.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

It is murder indeed. Children aren't to blame when rape happens. Obviously, I do not justify rape, however I also do not justify the taking of a human life. Children can grow up and learn about the terrifying rape event that occurred and then the sons & daughters can literally stand up to those responsible. It is sad for those children, growing up, to have no father. Not every man is guilty of rape. Not every woman is innocent either. Some women have raped men before too and even have committed murder. It's real. Netflix has some shows on serial killers; males & females. You are absolutely right about responsibility and consequences from sex. Indeed it is important to focus on yourself before taking on the responsibility of a parent.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

At conception, the fetus now has its own genetic code. unique to the universe. no one has or will ever have that genetic sequence. you are killing someone. stop trying to justify the murder of unborn children for your own accommodations!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

This is a much bigger moral issue than people make it out to be. There is no debate as to weather or not unborn babies are inherently human; they are. What is so troubling to me is people are willing to deny the humanity of a baby to justify their own irresponsibility. Their own disdain for personal responsibility when it comes to creating life. Before Roe V. Wade was passed, people recognized that when you have sex, you are responsible for any unwanted outcomes. But now, we live in a time where people live without that responsibility, that would otherwise require them to think about your own actions, before putting life on the line. And yet in every other area of life, killing innocent people is considered an immoral sin? Because that sin is socially acceptable? Because the people killing the unborn collectively have decided that murder is only okay when the majority deems it so, for a lack of personal responsibility? It's something more people should be thinking about.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

It should be banned.My name is srtrnc43331 and this is my first time using this website. First of all, it's murder. You are killing an unborn baby. Just because it isn't considered "alive" doesn't mean that it's non-existent. It's stupid that if you kill someone you get a life sentence or death penalty while abortion is ok. It's NOT ok! Abortion must be banned. It's murderous and selfish!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Science has already shown that fetuses are developing human beings. We are in full agreement that abortion should be banned.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Yes it must be banned!Abortion is a waste of an existing living thing especially when there’s birth control. If you don’t want the child then put him/her up for adoption, but you should wait until after it’s born.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

abortion should be bannedmost certainlykilling children is unrighteous(ok i sounded like a psychopath) sry lol
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Agreed my friend. Agreed. What pro abortionists don't realize is we were all once fetuses. We mattered enough to our mother and father individually to come into this world. Abortionists who dehumanize babies to nothing are only compromising their own humanity too. Do Abortionists deserve to live if they dehumanize other developing humans? No. God prevails!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Points of Proof for Life: Scientific:There are 4 parts explaining how there is significant evidence that abortion is unjustified solely because fetuses are indeed living human beings in development. There is no need for unnecessary philosophical debate over this. All pro choicers are self destructive and toxically subjective in all their arguments.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Even an article from the BBC site has arguments to support pro lifers:
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

I have more to add here. In my research, I have come across articles of Satanists now claiming the right to abort babies. This is utter madness. Fellow faithful Christians, if you are reading this, you know that revelations is coming true from the Bible itself! Yes, the devil worshippers are going for it. They are targeting the lives of newborn babies in development in order to "sacrifice them" to the Adversary himself!! This is indeed as all Christians with common sense would say; It is Good vs Evil all over again. Abortionists are now siding with them too. Ask yourself, is this truly logical to side with Satan? I say NO! Infant sacrifice is a crime and ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SATANISTS NEED TO BE IMPRISONED FOR LIFE! I testify Jesus is the Christ and is the Son of God. He is our Savior. Our Heavenly Father loves us and His Holy Spirit is already poured amongst His children; sons & daughters alike. I testify the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the true church restored upon this earth. I testify that evil shalt never win. God will prevail!! Jesus has already spoken that He has overcome this world. The Satanists stand no chance against the Almighty and His eternal hosts of Celestial angels. It will only be a matter of time when the Light of Christ defeats the darkness of the Adversary himself!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

John F. Kennedy and his democrats were way better! But who were the ones who murdered him? The deep state! And of course! OF COURSE THE GOVERNMENT DENIES IT! I HAVE SEEN ENOUGH HOUSE OF CARDS TO KNOW THAT THE DEMOCRATS BECAME SO CORRUPTED THAT THEY BEGAN HATING ON REPUBLICANS WHO WANT WHAT IS RIGHT FOR AMERICA! Kennedy stood up to racism, he stood for God's law of all man being created equal, he stood up against socialism, communism etc. He stood side by side with Richard Nixon and ofc Lyndon the Vice President. Democrats have never been so corrupt until recently!!! Or maybe they always have? I am a mere Canadian who loves America from a distance so on this, I must do more research. Gosh dang it, Vice President Underwood, you treasonous snake! Update: House of Cards episode 17 of Season 2 - Francis Underwood's wife had a termination of her baby before their political campaign....and they are Southern Democrats.....Wow. WOW. REPUBLICANS ARE RIGHT ABOUT DEMOCRATS BEING PRO ABORTIONIST!!! There was a pro family republican who called out Francis Underwood's wife of being a baby killer. It is true and she DENIES IT! Republicans are the baby defenders, the pro lifers. Democrats? Not even close because POLITICS AND POWER IS MORE IMPORTANT THEN FAMILY APPARENTLY!"Were you ever pregnant?" - Reporter"Yes" - Mrs. Underwood"Was it during the campaign? - Reporter"It was before." - Mrs. Underwood"Was it a miscarriage?" - Reporter"No." - Mrs, Underwood"Did-did you terminate the pregnancy?" - Reporter. She shows some tears and hesitation but continues on bravely and boldly."If I say yes, my husband's political campaign will be in jeopardy." - Mrs. Underwood to the reporterSo you admit....you murdered a child....You're right. Your husband's political campaign is in danger as is yours! SHAME ON YOU BOTH! Oh yes, you would expect your life to be threatened. Your faith too because God doesn't approve of murder!!, Mrs. Underwood! "My faith would be questioned. My life would be threatened." - Mrs. Underwood"But I won't feel ashamed." - Mrs. Underwood"Yes I was pregnant & yes I had an abortion." - Mrs. UnderwoodYOU ARE GUILTY OF MURDER AND SO IS FRANCIS! HE KILLED A MERE GIRL WHO GOT TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TRUTH OF THE DEATH OF RUSSO WHO WAS A FELLOW DEMOCRAT WHO HAD DRINKING PROBLEMS!Clare Underwood, you are under arrest for the abortion of three children! YOU ARE TO BE PUT IN DEATH ROW PRISON FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE WHILE YOUR HUSBAND GOES TO ALCATRAZ FOR LIFE! HE HAS COMMITTED SEVERAL HOMICIDES!House of Cards show is so useful to learn about American Politics and the treasonous corruption within.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Abortion: One Key Issue  By Gregory KouklAbortion involves killing and discarding something that's alive. Whether it's right or not to take the life of any living being depends entirely upon the answer to one question: What kind of being is it? The answer one gives is pivotal, the deciding element that trumps all other considerations.Let me put the issue plainly. If the unborn is not a human person, no justification for abortion is necessary. However, if the unborn is a human person, no justification for abortion is adequate.©1999 Gregory Koukl. Reproduction permitted for non-commercial use only.For more information, contact Stand to Reason at 1438 East 33rd St., Signal Hill, CA 90755(800) 2-REASON (562) 595-7333 www.str.org
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Many abortion doctors admit that this baby is a living human being. Many baptize the babies after the abortion is finished.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Many? How many? Many think that it's the mother's choice if she wants to keep it inside her or not.Think of a mass rape by soldiers to try and stamp out a certain race of people in a village... I'd get rid of the seeds of hate the minute I can!!!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Get rid of the seeds of hate? Don't make me laugh. You are the seed of hatred itself. Be my guest, hypocrite. You really do have a tongue for trash don't you? Yes you do. Your arguments are all invalidated because you are the one repeating trash over and over about killing a baby. People like you belong in prison for life!
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

I stand with you 100% jstantall. Abortionists are cowards who run from responsibility. Democrats have done the same just for power and politics! Feminazis do it because they simply want to for "women's rights". What about the man though? Oh right, they disregard the man's role but men are just as responsible when it comes to creating a child. Not saying all men are guilty of this but those who have been involved in such situations with a woman individually.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Whether it's right or not to take the life of any living being depends entirely upon the answer to one question: What kind of being is it? The answer one gives is pivotal, the deciding element that trumps all other considerations.Depends entirely ? Heavily for sure but I am not buying entirely.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Let's say your kid comes to you and says "Daddy, can I kill it" I would bet money that how you answer that question depends entirely on what "it" is. If it is a fly on your shoulder that's been bugging you, then by all means kill it. If it's the kid down the street, then whoa, we need to talk. The point is this; this is not some esoteric philosophical question. This is common stuff we do all the time without thinking, it's instinctive. We know how to answer this question and we do it all the time.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

You haven't brought any new arguments to the table. You've simply been reiterating the same "it's a person, don't kill it" argument. Not good enough as it's been rebutted many times.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

You haven't brought any new arguments to the debate. You've simply been using one analogy after another. This is tiresome.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

This is not a new argument. You're repeating yourself with the same analogy for "it's a person, don't kill it" And your argument has been rebutted many times. The fetus before it can survive outside of the mother's womb is not a person. It's a potential life and it's parasitic in its relationship with its mother, the host.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Well, the question is what makes us a person, and what makes us special above those beings which are okay to kill (most animals, insects plants etc...). I would argue that it's our ability to think and feel at a higher level. An embryo cannot think, feel, see, hear, remember, or do any of the other things that distinguish us as people and therefore must be put into a separate category then a fully formed person.Considering your ignorance on the topic of biology that you demonstrated in the evolution debate, I would not be surprised if you were unaware of this, but if you don't believe me I would be happy to provide evidence (or you could save me the trouble and trust me).The question then becomes: at what point does the unborn embryo/fetus gain the rights of a full grown person? There are two extremes:1) The moment after conception.2) The moment of birth.My problem with number one is that a single celled organism shouldn't have rights that are equal to those of a person, and my problem with number two is that mere physical location (outside rather than inside the womb) shouldn't dictate whether we have rights, so I propose that the embryo/fetus gains rights over time as it develops. How early these rights are given is obviously something that is going to be debated, and, in my own opinion, should be debated because it will be a much more fruitful debate than the current "all or nothing" one that is all too common.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

By the end of the 1st trimester a baby can think, see, hear, remember, and many other things.What is the difference between killing a baby nine weeks after conception and murdering baby nine weeks after birth?Tell me! I want to know.An abortion doctor failed to abort a baby and he was born alive. So the doctor took the baby and killed him. The doctor was not charged with murder but was charged with the failure to abort the baby.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

The difference is you're stopping the development of a fetus, which is not yet a life on its own. Killing a baby is taking an independent life.The fetus is a parasitic organism until it can survive outside of the mother's womb. This is around 20 weeks.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Over 68% of Abortions take place before the 6th week the point where the fetus first brain waves are detected and abortions after the first trimester are very uncommon.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

FYI an embryo is a stage of life it's not the thing. Your argument therefore falters because of equivocation. And furthermore person hood is a characteristic of the thing, not the thing. And finally, I don't discriminate against humans; it's just plain wrong. All humans, especially ones in the early stages of development, are worthy of or full protection. That's called moral clarity.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

No, it's called moral absolutism and it's intelectually lazy because it means that you refuse to actually think about the issue and use personal judgement when deciding what is right and wrong.No one likes getting an abortion, and everyone would be happier if there were less abortions; however, in the very early stages when all there is, is a clump of cells, a woman should be able to choose whether she want sto conitinue with the pregancy.In addition, we already have systems in place that grant increasing rights with age, so I don't see how this case is any different.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Well if I'm intellectually lazy because I can look at a murder and without thinking say it is wrong, than I'm guilty as charged. And I will wear that label with honor.But tell me why you think no one likes getting an abortion, and why everyone would be happier if there were less abortions. And about that "clump of cells" are they cancer cells? if not, what kind of cells are they?Finally,In addition, we already have systems in place that grant increasing rights with age, so I don't see how this case is any different.True, however life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is guarantied to all of them expect those in the early stages of development, those in their mothers womb. That's discrimination based on level of development and that's just plain wrong. The most dangerous place in America shouldn't be a mother's womb
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should not be banned

Looking at the world in black and white with complete disregard for reality is intelectually lazy, and I'm not at all shy to say it. The world is complicated, and when you look at it through an uncompromising moralistic lense you end up oversimplifying problems and giving simplistic answers. Calling abortion murder is simplistic and misses the point of the debate. I am doing my best to discuss the issue as rationally as possible but when you make statements like Well if I'm intellectually lazy because I can look at a murder and without thinking say it is wrong, than I'm guilty as charged it makes it really difficult to continue.Of course no one wants to get an abortion. Whether you believe it to be murder or not, it's still a sad event and you'd have to be heartless not to feel something. What I am arguing is that banning abortion is not the best way to reduce the suffering that unwanted pregancies causes. Instead we should concentrate on improving sex education, and helping increase the standard of living of the poor (a group that is disproportionately more likely to have unwanted pregancies and get abortions). I know this is difficult for you to understand on your moral high horse, but stop and consider that there might be more to the issue then the oversimplified version that has been hammered into your thick little skull since birth.I'm sorry but a single cell's rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness do not trump the right a woman to choose whether or not she wants to be a mother. We are talking about something that doesn't exist as a thinking feeling human being, and I don't understand why you can't rap your head around the idea of increasing rights as development occurs.The most dangerous place in America shouldn't be a mother's wombI agree, and that's why I said that a viable fetus should be considered a full human being, however you choose again and again to ignore this fact.
Debate: should abortion be banned
Side: abortion should be banned

Looking at the world in black and white is called moral clarity. Somethings are obviously wrong like theft, rape and murder. To say otherwise would be foolish and be to deny the obvious. Now you may use your intellect to justify those acts but then your intellect becomes complicit in the act. Not a place I want to go.Of course no one wants to get an abortionIf that were true no one would get an abortion. People get abortions because they want to.In regards to "feel something" and "the suffering that unwanted pregnancies causes" You seem to miss the greater suffering and depression women feel after an abortion, a suffering that last a life time. That suffering is far greater than that of finding out you got pregnant. That's the suffering I want to end. Not to mention the trauma of the child which just lead Nebraska to ban abortions after 20 weeks. It's called The Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.I don't understand why you can't rap your head around the idea of increasing rights as development occurs.Because it is wrong to base the value of another human on subjective terms like those. Adopting subjective standards makes it possible for the strong to exploit the weak and that's exactly what your standard does. You ought to be protecting the weak and innocent, not using your intellect to come up with ways to justify their killing. For example you said a viable fetus should be considered a full human being. So those that are not, are not human? You've just stripped them of their objective humanity by your subjective definition of humanity and now you feel justified in killing them, I'm sorry but that's not proper justification. I do hope you can see how dangerous your point of view is because it puts even your life in danger if logically followed through. All I have to do is be more powerful than you and determine that your life is not viable by my standards and then I'm free to kill you; might makes right. That's why abortion should be banned, because all human life is valuable by the fact that it is human. If we move the value from the objective to the subjective than no one is safe and we have turned the law on it's head because laws are meant to protect people. But who is a person is subject to the opinion of another. I don't know about you but I never would want to be treated like that.