azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

I wouldn't say that you would be AS guilty. How can we be expected to just ALWAYS try to prevent atrocities. Sometimes we do not have the power to do so.Now, if you had a gun with you and that guy had no defense or back up and you had an opportunity, sure, you should stop him. But circumstances like that are skeptical.I agree with everything before that sentence, though.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

The VIEWING of Child pornography, much like the VEIWING of violent Video games and movies, harms no one but the viewer themselves.It's sick twisted and wrong to rape a child, but it's sick twisted and wrong to rape a fully grown woman as well. It's terrible to physically abuse a child, just as it's terrible to physically abuse an adult. It's also terrible to mentally abuse someone of any age.The existence of Child Pornography does not cause pedophilia, nor does it increase the number of pedophiles, because one must have had pedophilic tendencies to create the child pornography in the first place, and one must have the tendencies in order to go searching it out. Otherwise there would be an endless cycle of catch-22 preventing child pornography from ever being made.Eliminating Child Pornography will not stop child molestation. There will be a demand for such images regardless, you can not stop demand, and you'll never totally eliminate production either.A victim is made only when a child is harmed in the making. The child is not re-victimized, or harmed again, when someone views what already exists. We don't criminalize people who watch a mass murder on the news, or in a film, or a video game, so why do we only criminalize the viewing of crimes when it deals with child pornography?
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: Yes

Additionally, there are various renditions of "child porn" where a child is not even involved. Paintings, Sculptures, Digital Art, 3D Models, Adults that look like Children, etc. And cases where a child might be involved, but not even aware, or affected by it. Discrete Photography, Discrete Filming, Swimsuit Modelling, Nudist Colonies, etc.To say the creation of child pornography invariably causes harm to a child is nothing but dishonest. There are times where a child is harmed, and for that, there must be retribution on the perpetrator who harmed her, however, where there is no harm done, a victimless crime, is and aught to be, no crime whatsoever.Or do we lock teenagers up because they engage in consentual relations with each other under the statutory age limit? Or do we criminalize the lawful marriage of a child in certain societies? Is a man who marries a "midget" woman who looks like a young girl a vile and dirty child molester?
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

No, of course not. Does viewing violent images online hurt someone (why is it, no one ever calls for banning violent images online)? Personally, I've seen violent macabre images, that I never searched for, that I'll literally never forget and will always make me feel nauseous. The ban on viewing these images is just an easy way for politicians to score points with their constituents. It's also an easy target for religious groups... that honestly would like to see no sex before marriage, all nude images banned, and main goal of a theocracy. Unfortunately, these laws haven't helped kids, these laws have ruined lives.
Debate: Does the VIEWING of Child Pornography hurt anyone?
Side: No

The question is on whether viewing it hurts anyone, and the answer is definitely no.No it isn't. If you view it then you help create the market for it.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

By these definitions I would say so. (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : reason ; also : the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests) Christian Science : the basic eternal quality of divine Mind : (3) : mental acuteness However it is difficult to operationally define intelligence, so these definitions may not be applicable to all.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I don't know if you mean "Intelligence" or "Intelligent" they are not the same, but I'll assume the former....then hit you with the latter.Yes, I think everyone does have intelligence to do basic things, because having intelligence just means that your brain is working and you can't be defined as a person without having a working brain, but not everyone is intelligent. There are clearly those who are versatile and those whom are not and we call those versatile people "intelligent". Not everyone is versatile.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Every one has some level of intelligence or they would be like plant and incapable of thinking.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Yes I think so, I think even though it may not be evident everyone is intelligent with something.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

If a person has the ability to think and learn, then they're intelligent.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Being able to do basic things doesn't make you intelligent. Intelligent; having or showing intelligence, esp. of a high level.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Then what does it make you?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

A person.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You mean a person of average intelligence?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Once again...why are you disputing to ask a question?I provided you a definition. Read it, digest it, make the simple connection. I'm not about to "baby" you.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You know your comment was stupid... that's probably why you're supporting my argument now.Also, my question was rhetorical... why wouldn't I dispute you?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Are you fucking with me? Or are you just dumb?And that question wasn't rhetorical, it had no point, it was in search of an answer.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You're rarely confident in your responses, considering how much you edit them. What you originally said was "an average person", rather than "person"... so I asked "A person of average intelligence?", because it seems like you're insinuating that intelligence only applies to smart people. My question was in order to show you that there are different levels of intelligence, including people of poor intelligence... like you!
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

My question was in order to show you that there are different levels of intelligence I pointed that out in my first response to you when I provided the definition of "intelligent". SO why the fuck are you trying to point it out to me when I've already stated it?(rhetorical question) I already know it, but you are too fucking stupid to understand what I've already pointed it out. There can be no other explanation as to why you're trying to point out my point to me as if I never made it and now you are trying to claim it as your point.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I pointed that out in my first response to you when I provided the definition of "intelligent". SO why the fuck are you trying to point it out to me when I've already stated it?(rhetorical question)Uhh... because you argued that being able to do basic things isn't intelligence. Without intelligence, you'd just be laying on the floor drooling.I already know it, but you are too fucking stupid to understand what I've already pointed.I remember when you used to have better insults... now you're almost exactly like Lynaldea... oh, wait...?There can be no other explanation as to why you're trying to point out my point to me as if I never made and trying to claim it as your point.It's okay Lynal-- I mean, Intangible. You'll out-smart somebody one day... it might be a child, but still...
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Uhh... because you argued that being able to do basic things isn't intelligence.No you idiot. What I basically said was, merely having thinking and learning capabilities does not make you intelligent.I did not in anyway say that only smart people have intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

What I basically said was, merely having thinking and learning capabilities does not make you intelligent.Wow... "because you argued that being able to do basic things isn't intelligence."I fail to see the difference between our two comments.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Maybe learn the definition of "intelligence" and "intelligent" and then you'll see the difference. Hopefully.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

What I basically said was, merely having thinking and learning capabilities does not make you intelligent.Here's what you said: "Being able to do basic things doesn't make you intelligent."
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Intelligent; having or showing intelligence, esp. of a high levelCLEARLY implies that there are different levels of intelligence.You fucking idiot.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

CLEARLY implies that there are different levels of intelligence.Then why are you disputing me?You fucking idiot.LOL! Do you really think you can offend me?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Then why are you disputing me?Because you were trying to make a point, that I've already made, but trying to play it off as your point, which I didn't agree with, thus, I disputed and then provided an explanation as to why I've already made the point, which makes your whole argument invalid.LOL! Do you really think you can offend me?No. But it never hurts to use sentence enhancers.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Because you were trying to make a point, that I've already made, but trying to play it off as your point, which I didn't agree with, thus, I disputed and then provided an explanation as to why I've already made the point, which makes your whole argument invalid.It seems like you're having some memory issues. Are you alright?No. But it never hurts to use sentence enhancers.They aren't doing anything for you.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

It seems like you're having some memory issues. Are you alright?Yes I do have memory issues, but all I have to do is scroll up to review the incident.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You also have scrolling issues.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

because it seems like you're insinuating that intelligence only applies to smart people. You CLEARLY completely misunderstood my point.Yet you are sitting there trying to demean my intelligence?There's no telling how stupid you actually are.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You CLEARLY completely misunderstood my point.Oh, then you must have typed up the wrong argument.Yet you are sitting there trying to demean my intelligence?Wait... let me check the comment below real quick.There's no telling how stupid you actually are.Ah... that's what I thought.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Oh, then you must have typed up the wrong argument.Oh no, I was just responding to an idiot. My mistake.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I'm an idiot!
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Thanks for finally admitting it, but you are smarter than some people, so you're not a complete idiot. :)
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I wish I could say the same about you...
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I wish I could say the same about you...Are you too stupid to put the simple phrase together?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I just don't like to lie.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I just don't like to lie.True. It is lying when you don't actually know. I can respect that.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Below average. FTFY.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

He originally had "an average person" as his response, until he went back and edited it to say "a person". My question was rhetorical... but yeah, you're right.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You called him lower intelligence later which works for me.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Yeah... and he called me an "idiot" throughout most of the debate LOL. Whatever.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Well, you guys were arguing over intelligent and intelligence and mixing the 2 like crazy.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Does intelligent not mean possessing intelligence? The way I see it, intelligent is just the adjective of intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

His point was that intelligent should be reserved for people with high levels of intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Intelligent can be used in a few different ways, but I think calling a smart person "intelligent" evolved from laziness. It would make more sense to call a smart person highly intelligent.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Intelligent can be used in a few different ways,Yeah, when you aren't following the definition. The words look similar so you assume that they are the same...
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

No, not the same. Intelligent is similar to a bowl filled with soup, where as intelligence is the soup.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I'm sure the intelligent person who downnvoted me has an intelligent explanation for why I am wrong. If not, please return my point, to maintain the sanctity of the point system. o.o
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

That there definition recursively defines intelligence as high intelligence... lolwut 0_0.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

No. It defines being "Intelligent" as having high intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Oh, oh, oh!If a person has the ability to think and learn, then they're intelligent.Using that other definition and the definition of intelligence, can be translated as-If a person has intelligence, then they have intelligence.LOL? It's meaningless to use it that way...
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

LOL
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Yeah, it's good to laugh at your own shortcomings.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Oh yeah?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Mhm.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

You really like typing, that don't you? Lol.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Yep
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Sooo simple minded. :)
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

zzz
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Eeep. My powerful aura has drained the energy from you .
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

I didn't get much sleep... so I'd say that the energy was already pretty much drained from me lol.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Oh, you're awake. G'morning sunshine. :)
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Yes, intelligence has many categories, and the strength of each intelligence type varies between individuals.But this is not in the case there is brain damage or some illness.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

everybody is different. just like everybody else! ;)
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Compared to other species, pretty much any human worth calling a "person" is intelligent in some manner. Compared to other humans, it's not necessarily the case.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Apparently not.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

You're a feisty one, arnt cha? ;)
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

It depends on your definition of intelligence, but given my interest in language as a tool I consider intelligence to be a meaningful word only if it has utility. If any and all thought is intelligence then the word is meaningless.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

If any and all thought is intelligence then the word is meaningless.How so? intelligence just means "brainpower", thus, if your brain has power, then you have intelligence.While the word "Intelligent" denotes a specific amount of brainpower. People seem to understand the word "Intelligence" and Intelligent" to mean the same thing, but they don't.The word "intelligence" alone, does not define how much intelligence a person has, but the word "Intelligent" does.Maybe this will help? Everything exist, but not everything is alive.-----------------Everyone has intelligence, but not everyone is intelligent(I.E of high intelligence). It maybe a weak comparison...idkSince you answered on the "No" side, then I would think for your argument to make sense you would have to say, "If any and all thought(intelligence) makes you Intelligent, then the word intelligent is meaningless.", because people obviously have brainpower(intelligence). The topic creator may have caused some confusion by using the word "intelligent" instead of intelligence...the title doesn't make sense.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

How so? intelligence just means "brainpower", thus, if your brain has power, then you have intelligence.Good job, you have provided his reasoning and didn't know it. If we reduce intelligence to just having brain power, it is basically worthless to say someone has intelligence because that only means he has brain power which would be next to impossible not to have. Just like you said, everyone has intelligence, thus it is meaningless because it doesn't tell you anything.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

But it's not worthless to say that a person has more intelligence than someone else.If the word was meaningless then it would have no use AT ALL
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

But it is worthless to say someone has intelligence.The word is meaningless until it has some kind of qualifier like "more" or "less."
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Ok I understand that...but his argument was basically. "No, everyone doesn't have intelligence because if that was true then the word is meaningless, thus, not everyone has intelligence."But that's obviously not true, since intelligence is simply defined as brainpower.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

So, it is his opinion that everyone has brain power, but not intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Yeah.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Wow... why did you even dispute me yesterday?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Because your statement was incorrect.Just having intelligence a.k.a thinking and learning abilities a.k.a brainpower, isn't what denotes that you're intelligent. Having astounding thinking and learning abilities would make you Intelligent."Intelligent" specifically means of high intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Everyone is intelligent to some degree.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Everyone has high intelligence to some degree? Yeah that makes sense.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

I see you were able to edit it to the correct statement.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

That's what happens when you type too fast....LolI didn't back space far enough.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

It is ok to wait a few seconds before hitting the submit button.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

That's not what I said...
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Yes it was.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Intelligent is just the adjective of intelligence. Intelligent can be defined as simply possessing intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

It is the adjective for HIGH intelligence.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Prove it.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Google it.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

I did. It further proved my point.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Suuure. Notice the "esp".
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

Your understanding of intelligent is just the lazier form of the word. While it works, it doesn't mean mine is wrong. Possessing intelligence would make someone intelligent, if not, then what would they be?Think of the phrase "intelligent design". Is it referring only to a smart God, or one who possess intelligence? Is the opposing argument that God wasn't intelligent or that he doesn't exist?
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

Possessing intelligence would make someone intelligent, if not, then what would they be?It doesn't specify anything.And Please please do, find the original definition of the word "Intelligent" and another source and post me the link.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

I see you're going to pick the ones you think you can easily dispute, while ignoring the rest of my argument.in·tel·li·gent (n-tl-jnt)adj.1. Having intelligence.2. Having a high degree of intelligence; mentally acute.3. Showing sound judgment and rationality: an intelligent decision; an intelligent solution to the problem.4. Appealing to the intellect; intellectual: a film with witty and intelligent dialogue.5. Computer Science Having certain data storage and processing capabilities: an intelligent terminal; intelligent peripherals.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: yes

1. Having intelligence.2. Having a high degree of intelligence; mentally acute.So If I call someone intelligent because they have intelligence,then they have high intelligence or does it just mean that they have intelligence?Obviously, contradicting things, because even idiots have intelligence, but they do not have a high degree of intelligence.So, one of those is wrong.
Debate: dose everyone have some kind of intelligent
Side: no

So If I call someone intelligent because they have intelligence,then they have high intelligence or does it just mean that they have intelligence?My point is that there are multiple definitions. Think of my soup analogy. Is a bowl with a little bit of soup in it, still a bowl with soup in it? Same as a bowl with a lot of soup in it. They're both bowls containing soup. Intelligence=soup, Intelligent=bowl of soup.However, people don't typically fix a bowl with just a little bit of soup in it. Usually, they fill the bowl with the entire can of soup (intelligence). That's what has happened with the definition of Intelligent. People only think of the full bowl.