azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

North Korea isn't allowed to have Nukes because their government isn't well enough developed to control that power.The US is considered to be the superpower this day in age, and when a country that isn't involved in any sort of international relations threatens to destroy a nation such as the US which has many allies and helps to lead the UN through struggles, you're going to have a problem. It's not just the US that doesn't want North Korea to have Nukes, it's all of the world; it's Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, Germany, the reason that it looks as though only nations related to America hold a grudge against North Korea, it's because the US has strong international relations, and North Korea has done really well in the past few days with crippling their own relations and pissing off powerful Nations.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

MY CUNTRRRRRYYYYYY ;)
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

I kind of have to back North Korea up as well , because we all know at the end of the day North Korea has barely any powerful missiles or artillery, but the back up of their mutual alliance. Any threats or action made on North Korea will result in either china or Russia helping them. So even if America were to use their technology on them, it's the amount of men their going to have on the battlefield, and with Russia having one of the biggest armies in world them alone to take on America with North Korea helping and china aiding. Plus having all their technology at once may be a big concern for America because their nukes will definitely brake through Americas boarders. So they need to think twice on what they are going to do.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

I really doubt that Russia would step into this war.What's in it for them? Russia is powerful, and intelligent, they surely understand that a conflict with the US isn't simply a conflict that will be taking place half-way around the world. The US is everywhere, and her allies are everywhere, and a powerful nation such has Russia or China is sure to know that. If North Korea does start something with the US, China won't step in to save a country that isn't worth the expended resources. North Korea has been doing a lot to destroy relations with China in the past few years, and the risk is too great frankly, and, ultimately, South Korea has a very powerful army, and is sure to help the US, and the same goes for Japan.You say that North Korea could form alliances with China and Russia, but they haven't, and they are unlikely to do so. China and the US are strong allies as well, and China has shown signs recently of backing away from North Korea as allies. Furthermore, one or two powerful allies doesn't add up to the multitude of strategically placed miltary bases, and allies that the US has; the UK, France, (Every major nation in Europe, more or less), South Korea, Japan.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

It is unlikely that any nation would support North Korea. China has moved on from it's Maoist past and Russia is a fledgling democracyChina would not commit it's troops to be killed defending a crazed paranoid regime from a long gone era.Russia doesn't have the military strength to fight any kind of war at the moment.The big question is how quickly the USA and ROK could help the North Koreans liberated from these evil dictators and deal with any die-hard Kim supporters
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

I believe NK might have the unknown capabilities to launch attacks on the mainland U.S. The reason I think this is: during WWII, how did Germany develop the bombs? Bombs were unheard of. They were also using these aircraft carriers that no one has seen. Why? Becuase the world was narrowminded and underestimated the UNKNOWN. Never underestimate what a country can do, otherwise you will lose.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

That's not true, bombs and aircraft carriers both came out in World War I, just saying.Also, thinking that North Korea "might" have this, or "might" have that will only lead to paranoia. So, while you don't want to underestimate an enemy, nor do you want to overestimate an enemy. Think about things from this perspective; the US developed nuclear capabilities 60 some years ago, and, as such, the United States government has a much stronger knowledge of said weapons, while North Korea has only just begun to develop these weapons. So, while these smaller nations have been working on obtaining these technologies, and disputing among themselves, nations like the US have been working on defensive technologies, and different uses for the aforementioned weapons alike. - So, whether North Korea has these technologies or not doesn't matter, they are only going to be proved to be utterly useless in any war that may come forth from this conflict.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

How can US win. I think that US cannot win N. Korea. Just tell the true story when compare to the Afghanistan War, do you think that US win or Lost. I believed that US lost because now the situation in Afghanistan the same as before 911.Therefore, come pare to N. Korea they stronger than Afganistant 100 time. S, How US Can win. No, not at all.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

there was no war with Afghanistan and there still isn't. us arm forces are only there to ensure safety for the people in Afghanistan not a war. so if a war was to have broken out a long time ago usa would have already won
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

South Korea Would Obliterate North Korea with their Super Duper Secret Weapon... Psi an Gangnam Style Dance Its like a killer dance... Mesmerizing., Polararizing and Totally Sick.At best Mr Kim would probably wet his big khaki pantslaughing and forget to press the Nuke Button !!!
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

People like you are why people like them hate America. Americans open their mouths and ignorance embellished with arrogance flows forth.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

People are saying that USA couldn't beat Afghan or Iraq. Lol, US didn´t even thought about nuking them. Now North korea...
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

All North Korea has to do is bomb Japan and South Korea. The United States' economy will crumple. The United States would then probably attack North Korea if they do this which will make the Korean peninsula a wasteland. The only country that has production powers of Japan, and the entire Korean peninsula is China which will make China an economic superpower and the United States will lose.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

North Korea alone, probably not. But I think the Chinese are willing to team up if it was against America, though china is getting pretty fed up with Korea. If china had to pick a side, it would be with North Korea, because they would stand more of a chance that way against America.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

I think China is definitely getting tired of being North Korea's benefactor. If war were to happen between North Korea and the United States/South Korea, it would be because North Korea initiated the attack. In this case, the United States and South Korea would definitely beat North Korea without a doubt. The question would remain "would China send their troops across the border to attack the United States? This would be EXTREMELY dangerous and the Chinese know this as well. I don't think China would want to risk going to war with the United States if North Korea initiated the attack. There would be more to be gained if Korea were united. China would no longer have to support North Korea, and a united Korea (reunited under South Korean leadership) would not only help it's citizens in the north with the food they so desperately need, but would thrive as a new nation and a new trading partner with China that would help them economically. We could also agree to have the United States military pull out of the new reunited Korea once the entire country comes under South Korea rule - meaning everybody would be happy.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

As you said only if the US left the area. The last thing China would want is American troops on its border. This is why China would move in to the North, not at the start but at some stage they would. The US would not leave if the North and South became united as why would they, it would be under the rule of the south goverment which is friends with the US. It would benifit the US if they could have access to China's Border from an ally country.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

Why does the USA have the right to dictate..We were told Hitler was bad because he dictated to us.. Zionist USA might be a piece full nation,instead GREED RULES!! The North Koreans will fight,as the Germans did for Germany,This is no Iraq cake walk..Total War. And once again for the bankers of Israel. I think that is why the USA is backing off all the sudden. They realize it will be a world war, not a little wipe off the map....... And not Iraq.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

Two points, first Hitler was a complete nutter . I'm not American but we were at war with the Nazis, in no way can you compare them with what Hitler done or what he was like. That man wanted total Nazi domination and was willing to do anything and kill anyone to get it as you should have been taught !Second point, Germans had to fight for Germany because they allowed a nut case into power as they have in North Korea, you bring these thing on yourself. North Korea does not want to dominate the world but needs to be watched and be under the thumb, as you, of all people should know what happends when a nutter is allowed to run wild when incharge of a country. US cares about human life and the innocent, alot of these countrys don't even care for their own let alone persons from other countrys. Learn from history
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

There is so many factors that either side would win.Like how America have better trained troopsAnd a little more money to spend for the warBut America really haven't been showing the skills they should be and could be and I see this all over these arguments that America have never lost and who could beat America?If you have any knowledge of American war history we have lost numerous wars so America isn't the best war fighting country even though thy could be Also something else people take for granted is that America is bigger so they would magically win but look at Japan they're small but have a considerable good country so size doesn't matter and know one knows how North Korea trains there army and they've been waiting to attack America even past the fifties and North Korea could over power them because as everyone knows size doesn't matter There are way more things I could say but this should be enough to make you think twice about your argument.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

So far america has so many enemies afghanistan,iran,cuba,syria,98% or the asian continent and as we speak 80% of the items used in the USA are manufactured in china.If the USA was to go to war with N korea this would give an opportunity for all its other enemies to rise up.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

xD. Dude your facts are so wrong. Afghanistan, Syria, and most of the Asian continent are either the U.S allies, or asking the US for help against the rebellions. Not to mention NO ONE will come to help N Korea. Heres why, China can not due to the fact China relies on US and its allies for items to make its products. Not to mention that US makes up 70% of China's economy and the rest are US allies. Oh and China has also moved away from N Korea and now is trying to strengthen its bond with the US. If you think Russia will help N Korea. No it won't. Russia and China are allies. If China doesn't fight. Why does Russia have to. Whats in it for them? And people saying Russia is one of the most powerful countries tell me. What makes them so powerful? Their 15,000 tank force thats from World war II and cold war. Their technology that is from the cold war? Their nuke arsenal that is also from World war and cold war and most of the nukes don't even work. Their Navy that isn't as big as Japan's navy. Their soldiers that are only trained in cold weathers. Their spies that you all say are better than US? Their Air force that is half the size of UK. So tell me? What makes you say NK will have aid from other countries when they are fighting their own wars.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

Okay so North Korea is small now, but soon we will rise and defeat America and their retched ways.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

Honestly, It's going to be close.... N. Korea and China has an extremely fierce military! According the to the Korean War in the 60's, General McAuthor or something like that had permission to cross the 38th Parallel. When China threatened to back down or they would use force. The government ignored them and tried to take over N. Korea. When China came out of nowhere. Greatly, the USA had underestimated the size, strength, and power of the Chinese military and was crushed! LOL This sick country is on the brink of going to hell. You have no money; the military lost again Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan. The communist party knows this is the perfect time to attack. When you are so weak and pathetic! Russia already has plans to attack and if N. Korea asks, China will join. America's Doom's Day is just around the corner! May God have no mercy US' Judgment Day.... To of you ignorant, chauvinist bastards!! Also, most of the world hates you and only pretend to be your friends for the money. OOPS! OBAMA messed that up; they turned their back on you and with China's world bank now! HAHAHA
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: USA

China is moving away from N Korea. As in its sick and tried of N Korea's attitude. And it is trying to strengthen its bond with the US. So China is out. Oh and if you think China would fight anyway. Heres a few fun facts on why the US can not fall or the world will be destroyed. China, the world's product machine. But the machine can't run without power. US allies gives China the items it needs to make its products. The US makes up 70% of China's economy. While the rest are US allies. If China makes US mad. US only needs to stop all trade. And China's economy will fall. Oh and if US falls. US has a last protocol that launches all its nuke and orbital defense laser weapons to its enemy and bye bye US enemies. That easy.
Debate: Would North Korea win in a war against USA
Side: North Korea

no only because the usa is in a war is isis ,the talaban and north kore the a fight the us at the same time the us will LOSE
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

There is nothing good from religion which cannot also be gotten within a secular world, and the secular world can secure those same things with fewer harms. Religion has served its evolutionary purpose during the earlier stages of the development of human consciousness. It functioned to help people feel better when bad things happened, to create an external sense of meaning and purpose, and to explain what we didn't understand. The truth is though that we can accomplish these things far better with a secular framework. Life does not have to have greater meaning to be important and personally significant. The understanding of something does not make it any less incredible. We are capable of reconciling ourselves to the inevitability of death. We are able to appreciate that while we do not have answers for something, myth is not itself an actual answer or explanation. And so forth.Religion is slow to change and has been a consistent tool of prejudice and intolerance. It is not as evolutionarily advantageous as it once was, and eventually we will live in a world where we are evolved enough not to need its mythical beliefs to make life bearable.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

At the end of the day the world would be a better place for sure. But humans can't live in a world like that. They fight among each other and are weak. They'll look to the sky deliriously asking for help to the clouds while they die. People search for security and weak people will take whatever form of security they can get their hands on, whether it be logical or not depends on the individual.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

Secular societies do much better than theocracy ever did.Just look ow fast we are advancing. Try to compare Somalia and Sweden... I'm pretty sure that there are many Somalian refugee in Sweden but I'm damn sure that there are no Swedish refugee in Somalia.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: No because...

The truth is we have not truly had a secular society because religion is so thoroughly pervasive even in self-proclaimed secular states. Your example of Somalia and Sweden is absurd. Somalia did not fail as a state because of religion. It failed primarily because of economics, race issues, and political strife.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

I would advice you to read something about Somalia's revolution. How the country look before and how it looks now.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: No because...

This may come as something of a surprise to you but I am not actually talking out of my ass. I am actually quite well informed on the matter having read multiple editions of Bildhaan, a journal on Somali studies, and have had conversations with a current elected Somali representative about the nation and its history. The civil war was a consequence of multiple variables, the primary factors including colonial history, political power struggles, economic resources, and inter-tribal conflict. Religion had relatively little to do with what happened in Somalia.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

...colonial history, political power struggles, economic resources... that's same for all revolutions but only those that are lead by religious groups (Jihadist in this case) end up as a horrible catastrophe.Bildhaan is a standard shit list scam.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: No because...

It is no accident that the same variables lead to conflict and civil war, and I think your case is quite weak. Absent the factors I mentioned it is highly unlikely that religion could have caused civil war in Somalia or elsewhere on its own, and there is not evidence in my opinion that it is even the primary cause. You have no evidence that it is anything more than a byproduct of other variables, a manifestation of pre-existing instabilities, a theo-political exploitation of the circumstances.Bildhaan is a credible academic journal started and overseen by one of the most reputable Somali scholars alive and an elected member of the Somali congress. You have no idea what you are talking about. I worked for the journal.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

Somalia was fully overtaken by about 5 Jihadist groups which after that start killing each other and banned everything. I don't see any similarity to French revolution or US civil war.Bildhaan is a scam, just bullshit parasiting on various grant systems, written by uninteresting "pseudo scholars" with ideas from 18th century.Somalia is in constant tribal war for more than 4000 years. It's maybe good for people studying stone age cultures.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: No because...

The civil war was not started by jihadists. It was started by paramilitary groups divided along tribal lines after the dissolution of the oppressive military regime of Barre. Jihadists took advantage of the situation, but like I said religion was not that primary cause. There simply is not evidence to support your claim. The Somali civil war is obviously different in its results than the French and U.S. revolutions/civil wars, but ultimately the causes were very similar - economics, politics, power, resources, etc.Quite frankly, I doubt that you have even picked up a copy of Bildhaan let alone even read what I wrote about it. Do current elected representative within the coalition and leading Somali scholar in the world really mean nothing to you? You honestly think you have a better grasp of what happened? Piss off.Somalia has not been in constant tribal war for more than 4000 years. It has not existed that long. No nation has. Europe was feudal for most of its history, so was China, and so forth. The only difference is that we call the factions groups for those regions and tribes when they're in Africa. The reason Africa overall and Somalia in particular has had struggles with development and stability is primarily a consequence of European colonization. Somalia is not a stone age culture, you ethnocentric ass.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

I would say yes though when you say religion I am speaking of an organization based around belief. It is not so much the concept of having faith in something that is so bad but how it can be utilized. Though there have been tangible benefits to religion the other side to this is far worse. Most religions cannot be proven in a factual sense so it is taken on faith. The problem is this can be bred into the idea that the facts behind something is not as important as the belief in it. For this to work you have to believe that the founders of the religious thought you are following were obvious vessels for your deity then everything they do is ordained. There lies the issue. Its human nature to want to maintain the positive and brush the negative under the rug. History has shown time and time again that one person can through force of will or personality change so much. That is far from always a good thing. A strongly organized religion takes away from you trying to understand your place in the life and how you relate to whatever/whomever you consider divine.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

I would think yes at times because of the past and how much of an issue is was, you were a Jew you got slaughtered by Nazis, and if you were Christian/Catholic you were downgraded. But just think if we didn't have religion would the world still be like what it is today? I think yes, at time religion would be better off not existing, but at the same time there is a reason for religion.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: Yes because...

This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.
Debate: Would the world be a better place if religion didn't exist?
Side: No because...

I like my religion. I don't think everyone should follow it. I think the broad choice of religions and beliefs available is a good thing, something for everyone. If everyone were atheists, what would the world be like? There would be no temples, no icons or myths.