Debate: Should the government be regulating baby names?
Side: NO

...and only from them ...everything else was banned and punished by death, heretical ideas as round Earth how many people died for that blasphemy??Franklin Roosevelt put Japanese citizens in concentration camps, is it illegal to name your kid after him? Andrew Jackson slaughter thousands of Native Americas, is it illegal to name your kid after him? It is sad that 6 million Jews were killed by authoritarians, but making it illegal to name your kid what you want is rather authoritarian as well.Offense =/= grounds to take away rights. Thats the problem with you Democrats, anytime someone gets offended you have to take someone's rights away. Which one do you favor more? Apparently, IT'S THE SECOND ONE. Which contradicts your non-pro-beating/bullying on children, because it is inevitable that children would be bullied for all the shit you can make up with a creative name, like Starshine or Jam jam.So you'll ban not just offensive names, but odd or uncommon names to? You know, lets just have you make a list of 10 ten names, an if the name isn't on the list your child can't be named it.How ignorant and painfully assumptions of a reply. "Naming my son Celestia will certainly not be thought as weird to others." What the fuck.I know people with names such as Zion, Felix, Keetly ect. none of them are tormented.How the fuck is saying that your children will be hurt by bullying an exaggeration? Bullying hurts a child; did you know that?Its an exaggeration because you assume that if a child has a slightly odd name they will suffer a life of torment. Humans judge other people, and children do the same but more openly by name calling. Actually, having such an unusual name will make it easy for them to name call.Children are usually bullied for being fat, having glasses, having an accent, having a strange interest, being short or for no other reason that some bully being bored. So what is it going to be? Are you going to regulate weight, glasses, accents and interests or accept the fact that most bullies will pick on a kid for no other reason then they are angry or bored.since when were they born teens? And within the period of time when they are in school before becoming a teenager, is when they are most prone to being bullied.Actually, false, high school is where children are most prone to being bullied.And seriously, why put all this crap on a teenager when you can simply give them a normal name. No paperwork for namechanging, no bullying. Too much to ask for?Its to much to ask for when a parent says "lets name our child [name you don't like here]" and then you kick in the door and yell "stop in the name of the law, that name is illegal!"THOSE ARE NORMAL NAMES AS EXAMPLES. And I don't mean that the name will torment them itself, the bullying will TORMENT. It will cause complications that could of been avoided.About 80% or 90% (can't remember the exact percentage) bullied during their lives, having them get a "normal" (matter of opinion) name would not stop this.There is no 'reasonable' boundary if you think we should not have regulations.Not everything has to be regulated, seriously, get out of these people's lives. Last time I checked only unloving parents name their kids stuff like "Bumfuck" and due to human nature making almost all humans have an unconditional love for their offspring, there is a rather small chance of this happening.