azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

What the hell chance do the untrained farmers , bankers and labourers of the U S have against the might of the American military who we keep getting told have no equal?The military is not committed to attacking the USA public in a conflict against the government. Historically speaking a portion of the military would be willing to kill it's own citizens in favor of politicians but most will not.Historically speaking every government has become corrupt and was taken down by the citizens or a foreign entity, What makes you think that the same will not happen here in time?
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

Ok best arm yourselves to the teeth and try and vote in a government yous are a ll not terrified are trying to slaughter everyone of yous , but’s that’s impossible for you guys isn’t it?
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

From my point of view, guns should be banned as soon as possible. The permission to carry and own a gun only makes the situation worse. It's already been dozens of mass shootings across the US in just two months https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting  In Europe, there is no such right, and they don't have so many casualties. I have stumbled across https://edubirdie.com/correct-my-essay an article on why the guns should be banned. However, under current administration it's impossible, from my view, to make guns illegal.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

They should not be legal because there is no overall benefit to society. The data shows unequivocally that significantly more guns are used for the purpose of committing crime than for the purpose of self-defence. Hence, the overall impact of guns on society is negative.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

https://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article213531964.html You should read up and become educated !!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

You should read up and become educated !You should read down and become educated.A study from October 2013 analyzed data from 27 developed nations to examine the impact of firearm prevalence on the mortality rate. It found an extremely strong direct relationship between the number of firearms and firearm deaths. The paper concludes: “The current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer.” This finding is bolstered by several previous studies that have revealed a significant link between gun ownership and firearm-related deaths. This international comparison is especially harrowing for women and children, who die from gun violence in America at far higher rates than in other countries.https://slate.com/technology/2015/01/good-guy-with-a-gun-myth-guns-increase-the-risk-of-homicide-accidents-suicide.html
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophy_hunting Read up on the Wikipedia you like so well !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

You clearly didn't write essays much in school. Ever learn to use any other websites than wikipedia? Maybe official government, university, or professional sites when trying to get reliable important info? Pretty sure you're the troll here hun
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

Most gun deaths, by far, happen in liberal heavy areas controlled by liberal run governments.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

You miss the point because you want to !!!!!!!!!WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of the Interior announced a new report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that shows that 101.6 million Americans—40 percent of the U.S. population 16 years old and older—participated in wildlife-related activities in 2016, such as hunting, fishing, and wildlife-watching.The survey illustrates gains in wildlife watching—particularly around the home—and fishing, with moderate declines in the number of hunters nationally. The findings reflect a continued interest in engaging in the outdoors. These activities are drivers behind an economic powerhouse, where participants spent $156 billion—the most in the last 25 years, adjusted for inflationhttps://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/new-5-year-report-shows-1016-million-americans-participated-hunting-fishing-wildlife
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

This is a lie that is why you have no supporting data to substantiate your claim. If a person is the victim of a violent crime why do they call for a person with a gun to come save them? It's because that is what saves most people from violent crimes. It is sad if you have seconds to react to prevent being a victim and the police are minutes away. It is very possible that you could lose your life, the life of a loved one, your property, your dignity.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

This is a lie as over half of gun deaths are suicide which is a personal choice which the government has no right to condemn. Police use guns every day to benefit society. The reported number is about 50,000 times each year a firearm is used to prevent criminal activity. This is substantial enough that it imposes on our right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

This is a lie as over half of gun deaths are suicideShow me evidence to support your belief that people who shoot themselves instead of other people are less dead.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

which is a personal choiceShooting anybody is a personal choice you retard, including yourself.You're literally stupid as a block of cement. Shut your idiotic mouth you rampaging halfwit.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

Police use guns every day to benefit society.Not in the UK mate. Like I said we aren't total pussies. We can fight crime without shooting everybody. We don't even find it particularly difficult.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

The reported number is about 50,000 times each year a firearm is used to prevent criminal activity.The reported number is that "defensive gun use is rare compared to guns used in violent crimes", which is what the study I posted said. Instead of throwing every obstacle at that fact which enters your underdeveloped mind, why not simply accept it?
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

Again the Pond Dweller admits it does not know much but it believes in it's Internet Intelligence !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

You are not to bright Troll !!!!!!!!!!!!Hunting is much more than a traditional American pastime. It creates more than 700,000 jobs nationwide. New studies now show that annual spending by America's 14 million hunters amounts to $22.1 billion. By comparison, and if hypothetically ranked as a "corporation," that revenue figure would put hunting in thirty-fifth place on the Fortune 500 list of America's largest businesses, right between J.C. Penney and United Parcel Service.The impact of the American economy of all that spending is extraordinary. When the spending figure was "crunched" recently by economic analysts to account for "ripple" or economic multiplier effects, hunters' spending was shown to have:Created a nationwide economic impact of about $61 billion.Supported 704,600 million jobs, or nearly 1 percent of America's entire civilian labor force, in all sectors of the American economy. Created household income (salaries and wages) totaling 416.1 billion, which is roughly equivalent to 25 percent of America's entire military payroll.Added $1.4 billion to state tax revenues, or nearly 1 percent of all annual state tax revenues combined.Contributed $1.7 billion in federal income taxes, which equates to almost half of the entire federal budget for commerce.http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/hunting/econ-hunting.html
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

Hunting is much more than a traditional American pastime. It creates more than 700,000 jobs nationwide.That's great. We should let you have a gun so you can kill defenceless animals after torturing them with a two hour chase through a forest. Yeah, I'm not too bright. I have difficulty understanding why psychopathy is a valid argument for the legalisation of guns.
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

You need to talk to Gavin Newson and air you grievances with him because i linked a California website !
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

Can you believe this Troll ?????????Shine up your rifle and break out the camo: The state of California is encouraging its eco-minded residents to get outside and start shooting.The California Department of Fish and Wildlife announced Thursday a new effort to recruit hunters and anglers throughout the state. Fish and Wildlife said in a statement it is partnering with other state and federal agencies as well as recreational communities to "address barriers and opportunities to hunting and fishing in the state.""The fishing and hunting opportunities in this state are unparalleled, they belong to all Californians and should be utilized by all of us. This effort is to make sure Californians know that," Fish and Wildlife Director Charlton H. Bonham said in the statement.https://www.sfchronicle.com/science/article/hunting-fishing-permit-california-fees-policy-13599231.php
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

ILION – Residents in this village of 8,000 or so along the Mohawk River usually don’t have much interest in news coming out of Nashville.But an item published Aug. 20 on the business page of The Tennessean sure caught their attention: Remington Arms, far and away the biggest employer in this town, has been touring possible new facility sites in the Nashville area.“The story was very much noticed,” said Ellen Jones, who owns the Farmhouse Restaurant located just across the street from the gated entrance to the sprawling Remington manufacturing facility in Ilion where the company has been making guns since Eliphalet Remington II forged his first rifle here in 1816.“Everybody here relies on Remington in some shape or form,” she said.Eight months after New York enacted one of the nation’s strongest gun control laws, Ilion is a community on edge. Residents and employers say they hear assurances from politicians that Remington, the oldest gun maker in America, will not move. But all they have to do is look to other upstate communities home to once-successful manufacturing companies – from Lackawanna and Rochester to Binghamton and Poughkeepsie – to see that such promises can be fleeting.https://buffalonews.com/2013/09/07/new-york-gun-makers-in-a-squeeze-stay-or-go/
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

NO. https://www.wikipedia.org
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743515001188 https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-4.xls https://www.npr.org/2018/04/13/602143823/how-often-do-people-use-guns-in-self-defense https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/past-tolls https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/gun-threats-and-self-defense-gun-use-2/ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/theres-a-new-global-ranking-of-gun-deaths-heres-where-the-u-s-stands https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/gun-deaths-eliminated-america-learn-japan-australia-uk-norway-florida-shooting-latest-news-a8216301.html Read through these. questions, comments? Itried to pick mostly neutral sources but a couple of them may be biased somewhat, so apologies I guess
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Pro-Gun

I'm a fan of the CDC App WISQARShttps://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html
Debate: Guns should be legal
Side: Anti-Gun

Yeah wow, ok. So yes important contribution, it's actually 125 less deaths than the over 38,000 deaths. Thanks for the update. But yeah, sorry. I meant to include the CDC in my list. Except use this link for reference since it actually has the recent stats. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Gun problem solved! You are welcome ;)
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

The best way to solve problems that Democrats shout about is the finger. There's no middle ground between freedom and Communists. You just defeat them. That's it. We don't negotiate our inalienable rights with Communists, tyrants, terrorists, crooks, progressives, ever.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

The best way to solve problems that Democrats shout about is the finger. There's no middle ground between freedom and Communists. You just defeat them.Shut up with your idiotic neo-Nazi bullshit you retard. Democrats are capitalists. They have nothing to do with Communism. And you didn't defeat Communism in the first place. Sure, the Soviet system collapsed: followed 16 years later by your own system.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Democrats are capitalists. TheNotorious Lie counter: 81Bernie Sanders, Ocasio Cortez: DemocratsBernie Sanders, Ocasio Cortez: Socialists
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

TheNotorious Lie counter: 81You think it's a lie to point out that the American Democrat Party is capitalist? Bronto, you're literally retarded. Go away you stupid Nazi imbecile.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

You think it's a lie to point out that the American Democrat Party is capitalist? It's a lie to claim the Democrat Party isn't heavily supported by socialists.TheNotorious lie counter: 82
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

It's a lie to claim the Democrat Party isn't heavily supported by socialists.You didn't claim the "Democrat Party is heavily supported by socialists". You literally claimed the Democrats were Communists and that you needed to "defeat them". You are a militant neo-Nazi RETARD.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

You made the broad sweeping claim that Democrats are not socialists and are a party of capitalists.Lie counter: 83
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

You made the broad sweeping claimDemonstrably untrue. I responded to your (i.e. "Spud's") broad sweeping claim. The timestamps on the posts prove it, Nazi boy.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

neo-Nazi bullshitBy Democrats, he's referencing leftist "democratic" socialists. Not all Democrats are commies, but there are many.you didn't defeat CommunismYou're right, the U.S. didn't defeat communism. The USSR collapsed in on itself because of terrible leadership. That doesn't mean that communism works, if that's what you're saying.by your own systemWhat system are you referencing here?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Not all Democrats are commiesIt was Democratic Presidents like Kennedy and Johnson who worked tirelessly to defeat the Communists during the Cold War. The Democrat Party is a liberal capitalist party and if you do not understand that it is because you are either retarded, dishonest or further right than Hitler. Capiche?You're right, the U.S. didn't defeat communism.I know I am right. Clearly however, you do not know that, despite what you claim, because you are trying to argue with me.The USSR collapsed in on itself because of terrible leadership.As did the US in 2007.That doesn't mean that communism worksCommunism worked for 70 years, during which time the Soviets invented satellite technology and were the first to put a man in space.What system are you referencing here?See if you can work it out, Batman. And it's "which". Which system.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

it is because you are either retarded, dishonest or further right than Hitler. Capiche?You think we're Muslims? Poor story bro.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

Communism worked for 70 years, during which time the Soviets invented satellite technology and were the first to put a man in space.And murdered their own people using Stalinist tactics and surveillance on anyone who stepped out of line or got in the way. So that is "Communism working"? Stupid story bro. Mega stupid story. Stupid story on steroids.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

It was Democratic Presidents like Kennedy and Johnson who worked tirelessly to defeat the Communists during the Cold WarThe Cold War didn't end during Reagan's Presidency? Obama and the history books must be wrong.https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/03/20/flashback-obamas-debate-zinger-on-romneys-1980s-foreign-policy/
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

The Cold War didn't end during Reagan's Presidency?Were any claims made about who was President at the end of the Cold War?No there weren't. You stupid retard.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

It was Democratic Presidents like Kennedy and Johnson who worked tirelessly to defeat the Communists That's weird. Last time we talked, you said the Democrat Party used to be the right wing party.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

That's weird. Last time we talked, you said the Democrat Party used to be the right wing party.Are you saying you don't understand how time works?
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

like Kennedy and JohnsonKennedy, Johnson, and Nixon among others wanted to end the war in Vietnam, not continue it. They wanted to stop fighting communism by extent. Also, of course they hated commies. Everyone did, and a lot of people still do.liberal capitalist partyThe Democratic party is a political party with views on the left side of the political spectrum. Communism and socialism are both ideals on the left side of the political spectrum. The Democratic party is, for the most part, what is pushing for universal healthcare. Also, if you look at the 2016 presidential election, you'll find that Bernie Sanders (noted Democratic Socialist) moved to the Democratic party with all of his Bernie bros because he knew that running as an independent wouldn't do him any favors.further right than HitlerWouldn't Hitler be considered alt-Right? Also, Hitler was a part of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Socialism is a less extreme version of communism, which is a leftist ideology.As did the US in 2007The United States has never collapsed in its history. We've had economic depressions, but we've pulled through every time. Unless of course, you want to count restructuring the country by taking out the Articles of Confederation and replacing it with the Constitution. That, I can get behind.worked for 70 yearsIt worked exactly how it was supposed to work if how it was meant to work was to make everyone poor and create massive food shortages.invented satellite technologyWith the help of German scientists. Also, communism is not the reason for the USSR getting the first man into space.BatmanI'd rather you answer my question than you be a smartass, but do whatever works for you I suppose.whichI couldn't care less about semantics.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon among others wanted to end the war in Vietnam, not continue it.They were precisely the people who made the decision to continue the War in Vietnam you revisionist retard.Johnson announces more troops to Vietnam - Jul 28, 1965 - HISTORYPresident Lyndon B. Johnson announces that he has ordered an increase in U.S. military forces in Vietnam, from the present 75,000 to 125,000. Johnson also said that he would order additional increases if necessary. He pointed out that to fill the increase in military manpower needs, the monthly draft calls would be raised from 17,000 to 35,000.https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/johnson-announces-more-troops-to-vietnamPresident Kennedy orders more troops to South Vietnam - May 11, 1961President Kennedy approves sending 400 Special Forces troops and 100 other U.S. military advisers to South Vietnam. On the same day, he orders the start of clandestine warfare against North Vietnam to be conducted by South Vietnamese agents under the direction and training of the CIA and U.S. Special Forces troops. Kennedy’s orders also called for South Vietnamese forces to infiltrate Laos to locate and disrupt communist bases and supply lines there.https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/president-kennedy-orders-more-troops-to- south-vietnam I'm not sitting here all day challenging your self-contradictory, false, idiotic revisionist history. If you want to debate then I expect a minimum recognition of basic historical facts. Until then, you are on my personal list of imbeciles with which to avoid conversation.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

The United States has never collapsed in its history.Don't be so naive. Your economy flatlined. It dragged down several major European economies with it. The only thing that revived it was socialism. The major banks were given huge (i.e. trillions of dollars) sums of taxpayer money by the government, without the people's consent. Hence, in the most ironic of all outcomes, Russia was saved by capitalism and the US was saved by socialism.It worked exactly how it was supposed to work if how it was meant to work was to make everyone poor and create massive food shortages.You can stfu about food shortages too you bizarre hypocrite.41 million people struggle with hunger in the United States, including 13 million children and 5 million seniorshttp://www.feedingamerica.org/hunger-in-america/facts.html
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: True.

With the help of German scientists.Remind me again how the Americans got to the Moon. Whose rocket technology did they use? Also, communism is not the reason for the USSR getting the first man into space.I completely agree. However, I have a strong suspicion that you will take the opposing view if someone questions whether capitalism has been responsible for any of America's achievements. You strike me as a typical American hypocrite, tbh. Judging other nations for faults which your own is equally, if not more guilty of.
Debate: Guns should come with a license agreement that it will not be used to commit murder.
Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

got to the Moon.I'm not suggesting that the Americans got into space all by themselves, either. I was pointing out that the Russians didn't get into space first all by themselves as the other guy said.questions whether capitalism has been responsible for any of America's achievementsI doubt very seriously that capitalism has helped America achieve anything that it has. I'm not saying that America got to the Moon first because of capitalism. I'm disproving the other guy's claim that communism helped the Russians get the first man into space.judging other nations for faults which your own is equally, if not more guilty ofYes, I judge other nations for their shortcomings just as I judge my own country of its shortcomings. If you can show me one country better than the United States, go ahead. I doubt you'll find one.