Debate: If evolution is taught in schools shouldn't creationism?
Side: Not on my watch!

"lolthe reason you cant have conclusive data about the big bang, is because of, i daresay... their arrogance."While there may well be some arrogant cosmologists and quantum physicists out there, what is intrinsically arrogant about searching for knowledge? Personally, the arrogance I see on these issues is when people who obviously don't know the first thing about these principles accuse the scientists, who spend their lives studying these concepts in minute detail, of not knowing what they are talking about. To me it seems like many people making these arguments are basically saying "I find this stuff confusing, therefore nobody else can possibly understand it either." That, I believe, is arrogance.The lack of conclusive proof right now has to do with the scale of the subject matter. We are talking about an unbelievably energetic yet incomprehensibly brief moment that took place almost 14 billion years ago at a "point" that doesn't really exist anymore. This isn't like figuring out who took the last cookie from the jar or who the baby's father is. Since pretty much the entire universe and all of the laws of physics count as clues to the origin, that's a heck of a lot of evidence to sort through, countless hours of equations and stargazing and fine-tuning of technology. This sort of thing doesn't happen over night. But using the fact that we don't know the answer right now as some kind of evidence against science or atheism is ludicrous. We didn't always know how to combat disease. We didn't have a very good or thorough explanation for earthquakes or volcanoes until a few decades ago, or any good way to date the Earth in an absolute sense until about a century ago. As time goes on, scientists (arrogant and otherwise), keep striving to learn more and more about the universe around them. As they do so, the list of things to be considered incomprehensible gets smaller and smaller. "OK, so a few atoms bumped into each other and, as a result of this such a complex thing such as the human brain came about as a result of this."I guess if you word it like that, it seems a little silly. Then again, you also tried to simplify pretty much all of science into a 31 word sentence. You missed a couple million details. "If you were to say the origin of the "accident" of the atoms bumping into each other, which I will say is no accident, you'd have to say what or WHO started it."Not until we know the answer. Its dishonest to claim something as truth when we don't know what the truth is."You seem very educated,"No more than any one else can be if they are interested in increasing their knowledge. But thank you!"Many things humans understand are rather otherworldly (here is something devoid of logic again)."Actually, all the things we do understand are quite natural. Its the "otherworldly" stuff that provides no mechanism to be analyzed. Therefore, if such things or places do exist, one must question how one can truly know anything about their nature. "Humans do have a limit. And it cannot fathom the creation/origin of the universe."Can you delineate our limit? Provide evidence that we have reached it? And why accept that we can't fathom the origin of the universe? Why not?"Something convinced me that there is more to the World than the Natural. Something convinced me there where was another place"Interesting. You see I had pretty much the exact opposite experience. "I must say you are truly are one of a kind......"Thank you.