azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

I hope that isn't the case. I would hate to try to explain a photo that was just a photoshop effect.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Well, if you run the image through a reverse image finder you will see that ABC NBC BBC all have THIS photo. (I did not want to look through 100 more pages of results so i stopped there) Links: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/16/17781262-second-boston-marathon-bombing- victim-identified-as-29-year-old-woman?lite  http://www.abc.es/internacional/20130421/abci-carlos-arredondo-costa-rica-201304202126.html  http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-22161135  http://www.usnews.com/news/special-reports/articles/2013/12/20/2013-the-year-in-pictures-usnews  (Reverse Image finder I used with search results: https://www.tineye.com/search/0d7add16f3d76e541cf41f6408c0c6aed512a7fb/  )
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Actually I did not call you a close minded idiot. Yeah, you did actually. Anyone can write a note. Did he SAY IT?He did not give a confession while on drugs. Therefore, your argument that he confessed while on drugs is false. And there would be ALOT more blood. ZERO BLOOD. NONEI see blood.  Every nurse, doctor, student I have talked to says that image is impossible.I don't doubt that, I doubt the pictures are a good representation. The injury involving the hockey player was when he sliced her curated artery and he would have died in minutes. This mans lets were blown OFF BOTH OF THEM, his femoral arteries would be spurting blood everywhere and he would have died in MINUTES. Exactly, two completely different types of injuries. I can't compare the 2. How can you not see that?   The evidence is here so the government was obviously smart enough to pull this off. Circular reasoning.   Like David Steele said “Every Single Terrorist Attack In US Was A False Flag Attack”. What do you not understand about this quote?He works for the government that you don't trust. Why is he a reliable source?   am sure this 20 year intelligence veteran is nothing but another crack pot right?You are claiming that there has never been a real terrorist attack in America and he is the only guy who had first hand knowledge and will admit it. How is that not incredibly hard for you to believe? They leave tons of clues putting these terror attacks in place and still don't have anyone else who is disgusted enough to come forward?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Nope. No real terrorist attacks in the united states. NONE. Why do you think your government would not lie to you about this? They lie to you everyday. I don't see the logic, it is like playing hide and seek with someone who cheats after awhile do you want to play? Nope, yet you still trust the government for some reason. By blood I mean there is NONE dripping from his leg whilst he is in the wheel chair. All you did was nit pick the bad things you could not understand in the article. Blood would be EVERYWHERE, spurting all over the place. I trust David because he cares enough about the average person. I trust him because I KNOW these terror attacks are scripted like a play and performed(Not everyone is involved, that is real terror some feel. not thousands of people in on it). And he's not the only guy I chose him because 20 years intelligence work for the marine corps sounds pretty good to the average person. You are playing the denial game and it is very annoying. How about this stop nit picking at things you don't understand and try to figure them out. Ask yourself this, how is this man alive? No tourniquets no medical aid for 7 minutes while he was on the wheelchair and post blast. Why is that blood to lightly colored? As you saw from the hockey player that is not real blood and the other photos of injuries also aid my claim. Ask any doctor ask any EMT and they will say that his injuries were impossible to survive and the fact there is no blood dripping from his leg onto the ground yet, supposedly his legs are blown off. What is considered a good representation? I think everything I present will be marked off as not good enough. And did you see the video I linked to make me think he was on drugs or did you just ignore it? HE DIDN'T SAY HE DID IT. There is no video of him even in the court room! Just drawings! Every other court case there is... why? Why no footage? All these "coincidences" and absolutely NO proof he did anything and you still believe this isn't a false flag attack?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

How is my argument the denial game? Do you have proof he in innocent? "He wrote it on a note" ANYONE can write a note and sign it. You got proof he is actually guilty? I mean other than because the MSM told you so. http://i.imgur.com/mYfsZs4.jpg how do you explain this? Just a coincidence? http://i.imgur.com/wRTiCiG.jpg this? http://i.imgur.com/zWJX6IH.jpg I already know you believe these men are doing nothing here, just watching. http://i.imgur.com/BriOquA.jpg WOW! This backpack seems familiar! I am sure it is nothing, move on. http://i.imgur.com/Jykj3z1.jpg CNN lying(Not surprising, government MSM) http://i.imgur.com/JWF4pyN.jpg all this is fake/ unreal also or a coincidence. https://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/jeff-bauman-long-shot.jpeg  Now that I look at this photo it dosen't even look like a real bone. Source: My biology class. No blood dripping, but what do I know right? Again I want some proof he is guilty other than "Because MSM/Government told me so"
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

How is my argument the denial game?The main idea is that there are real terrorist attacks, and you just deny it. Plus, I give you a valid objection, you just deny it.Do you have proof he in innocent?Nope, he did it.You got proof he is actually guilty?Yep.I mean other than because the MSM told you so.Yes, he admitted it.Now that I look at this photo it dosen't even look like a real bone. Source: My biology class.Man, you had a hardcore Biology class. I was never shown a blown up leg in any biology class I ever took.No blood drippingI already told you why this is irrelevant.but what do I know right?Exactly.Again I want some proof he is guilty other than "Because MSM/Government told me so"He told us so.I already know you believe these men are doing nothing here, just watching.I don't know what those men are doing.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

So he did not physically say he did it. But he wrote it on a note? ok dude someone does not realize anyone can write something. Anyway, too far gone for me to persuade, bye
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Yes, I am too far gone to ignore confessions.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

An eye for an eye leaves both people blind. What he did was wrong, but it would be equally wrong to kill him. Life is the most basic right there is.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Executing Tsarnaev is not going to function as a deterrent. More likely his execution will be used to radicalize more disillusioned persons into acts extremism. The promise of martyrdom may actually be more enticing than dissuading, and certainly more attractive than life in prison.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

LIFE will only be appropriate if we can make sure that he spends every moment of it being unhappy, feeling guilty and wishes every second that he were dead. But if we take actions that makes him feel that way, then people will start talking human rights! (Why people don't understand that human rights are for 'HUMANS', not monsters, is beyond me!) And this will only result in more time, money and other resources spent on this son of a bitch! So hang the fucking bastard!
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

What happened to the original purpose of prisons? Rehabilitation?What you have described is revenge. You want him to suffer for his crimes. What about justice?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

What happened to the original purpose of prisons? Rehabilitation?Prisons have never been solely for rehabilitation. Prisons have been for punishment since before they were called prisons. Prisons are also for simple incarceration. The notion of rehabilitation is new.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

I was referring to the modern purpose of incarceration. The United States has practiced rehabilitation for almost two centuries. Have we given up? Is punishment the ultimate purpose of justice?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

There is a wide spectrum of criminal behavior to be considered.A teenager who gets drunk, hops in his car and has an accident in which another innocent person is killed, could quite possibly be successfully rehabilitated. Another teenager who sets a bomb next to an innocent little boy, then walks away, is not equivalent. Justice is in fact relative.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

A teenager who gets drunk, hops in his car and has an accident in which another innocent person is killed, could quite possibly be successfully rehabilitated.Another teenager who sets a bomb next to an innocent little boy, then walks away, is not equivalent. Justice is in fact relative.Refer to my comment about rehabilitation of terrorists to another of your comments below.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

A blog and an opinion piece. HmmmThe same response (rehabilitation) to vastly different crimes in vastly different circumstance are not justice.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Did you actually read them?The blog was a news report written by a journalist at the Washington Post. It just consolidated information from other news articles about the subject of rehabilitation. It gives a general idea and provides several links to further information."An opinion piece". This is the International Criminal Justice Review. That would be like saying a review article in Nature has no validity because it does not provide original research and only analyzes data/conclusions from other articles.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

The same response (rehabilitation) to vastly different crimes in vastly different circumstance are not justice.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

So you still refuse to read them. I guess that works for a debate.The same response (rehabilitation) to vastly different crimes in vastly different circumstance are not justice.I have no idea what you mean by this. Are you saying that serious crimes do not deserve a chance at rehabilitation?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Yes you're right. The more severe the crime the more extensive the need for rehabilitation. It may take many more years or may ultimately prove impossible. You say that the purpose of prison in the USA is punishment as if it is the only way it could be by definition of it being a prison. This is not so. In Spain the primary purpose of the criminal justice system, as stated in the constitution, is rehabilitation. It has been argued for example that indeterminate or whole life sentences are unconstitutional.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

The US code also notes how imprisonment is not a means to rehabilitation. This was recognized almost 150 years ago. Although there is no explicit clause for rehabilitation, rehabilitation has been practiced in the US for 200 years.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

if he had no problem taking lives of innocent bystanders, his life should be taken as well. 1. he bombed innocent people running in a marathon that benefited charities.2. he was on the run, still shooting and trying to kill people trying to turn him inbottom line this is oneeee bad dudeee
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

He was wrong for killing, but killing him will not bring his victims back.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Did he let others live in Boston. He killed many and hurt many more. He should absolutely die, he is a waste ,a coward and shouldn't get the luxury of life.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Blokes like him should've got it before but like everything else a bad brute gets respite for a longer time.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Yes. These terrorists behead, bomb, etc. those they have in captivity and those free from their grasp in an attempt to terrify the world. Since this the case one can reasonably assume that they are not completely void of a fear of death, because this is what they believe is the worst one can do to people. If one pretends life is not precious and applies the same terror tactics, then you have taken the sting and shock value out of terrorism.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

He made us lose innocent lives why doesn't he deserve to lose his to compensate
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Quit voting for the party that started the KKK and opposed the Civil Rights movement, and we can keep these animals out of our country.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

"Show me someone innocent, I'll show you there's no proof." (Stone Sour)More importantly, killing one person does not bring anyone back from the dead nor does it erase the emotional grief of the loss of those that person killed. At the very best it might mitigate some of that grief, but even that is questionable. I find retributive vengeance to be a rather outdated and naive form of justice, frankly.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev killed and maimed people, he should be put to death for this. If we do not punish him with death, then we will be perceived as weak by other nations. Terrorists especially. If he gets a life sentence, more attacks will follow because people will be like 'meh it's just a life sentence, let's just send old people who are close to dying,' do we really want that?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev killed and maimed people, he should be put to death for this.Retribution is a shallow appeal to immediate emotional gratification with little objective consideration for the long term consequences of the action. If we do not punish him with death, then we will be perceived as weak by other nations.There are roughly 200 nations in the world, of which over 100 have abolished the death penalty and the trend is towards abolition rather than sanction (source 1, source 2). The reality is that most nations, including many of our important allies, are more likely to see the U.S. an immoral and unjust due to our use of execution than they are to see us as weak. With respect to hostile nations, I would suggest that they are well aware of the differentiation between our handling of domestics and our handling of international affairs. With respect to terrorists, they will spin whatever we do into their favor - we are either pedaled as weak or we are creating martyrs. Much more importantly, when we allow our domestic affairs to be dictated by our fear of terrorism we have become weaker in actuality and given terrorists exactly what they wanted.  If he gets a life sentence, more attacks will follow because people will be like 'meh it's just a life sentence, let's just send old people who are close to dying,' do we really want that?Acts of terrorism are perpetrated by radicals who do not care if they live or die for their cause. Execution is not an effective deterrent in any case, but this is especially true in the instance of terrorism.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Someone who accepts any number of lives to reach his goals does not deserve to live.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

one issue with that claim. He didn't do it. And here is why: https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/false-flag-theatre-boston-bombing-involves-clearly-staged-carnage/  and http://www.hangthebankers.com/proof-boston-marathon-bombing-was-a-false-flag-operation/  did I mention he was a FBI informant?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

You should probably read over the court proceedings again.He was not an informant. His defense claims his brother was approached by the FBI to inform on the Chechen and Muslim community. They cite this as an instigator for his brother's paranoia and subsequent actions.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Ah yes, the conspiracy theories, they must never be missed.Of course 9/11 was a government job, wasn't it?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Well, The undeniable explosive evidence found by the ae911truth team points towards that direction. Two of my favorite videos showing the clear proof of explosives used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYCuAa0eFKg  and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oVs_94VHk8  wouldn't say government though, congress has nothing to do with it
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Yeah, beautiful stuff for gullible people, warmers and the like.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Can't ever just admit that Islam is bat shit crazy.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Love him the death penalty as that won't give him the chance to escape prison
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Crucify
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Every doctor and nurse I have shown this video says it cannot be real. A total fake.There are so many unanswered questions about the Bombathon that the American people just ignore!How have the American people become such a flock of dreeple mutants?
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

Good question. And it's obvious that you are one of them...
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Those are survive of taking other lives doesn't deserve to live. Murder is the disgusting, and shouldn't ever be tolerated especially terrorists.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Although he did a horrible thing, he still is getting a punishment. Having to spend the rest of his life in a prison is enough. He won't be able to connect to the outside world like before. He can't explore. Remember he is still young, he hasn't seen the world yet. I know he did a horrible thing but killing him is the same as killing anyone else. The only difference is you have a motive.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Death Penalty

Why are you posting this on the wrong side of the debate?Furthermore killing him is completely different to killing anyone else. Killing a malicious, psychopathic terrorist is not comparable to killing innocent people.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

He won't be able to connect to the outside world like before. He can't explore. Remember he is still young, he hasn't seen the world yet.Also young, also no more connection to the outside world like before, also unable to see and explore the world. That symbol you are using for your ID has a history of representing unrealistic Utopian ideals about peace and love, that simply don't work with terrorists.
Debate: Should Dzhokhar Tsarnaev get LIFE or DEATH?
Side: Life Sentence

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/11/28/saudi-arabia-says-12-percent-of-its-rehabilitated-terrorists-have-returned-to-terror/ http://icj.sagepub.com/content/21/2/118.short (Critiques and suggestions regarding the Saudi program)Rehabilitation is possible, even for the "worst".
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

Evolution teaches the survival of the fittest - one fit creature doesn't save another in nature, so why should humans be any different?
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Yes, stop saving them.

You are wrong!!!! Have you not thought of the future? Have you not thought of what would happen if one animal disappeared forever? What would happen to that ecosystem in that area? If a species went extinct right now our grand kids, great grand kids and so on will never see them only as pictures! How dare you say that?!?!?!?!?!? Every single living cell in the universe has the right to live? Do you not care about the ecosystems? The affect it could have on other animals that depended on it? How dare you say that? Every single animal, plant and insect is the fittest. You do not know the effects of a species being wiped out and the effects of the ecosystem it lived in. What if a species that was wiped out was a brand new discovered one? Scientists would not be able to study it because they are extinct because we made it like that! We humans are moving into habitats of other animals that are native to that land. In 1949 a species of snake from Australia was brought to Guam by a stupid idiot. Now 12 insect eating birds are wiped out in that area because of that kind of snake. 2 of them are in an area where they can be protected for now. Now Guam has a large population of spiders that the population of spiders were once under control by the insect eating birds. There are not enough insect eating birds there to control the population. See what happens when a species is wiped out? Other populations become greater or lesser. Nature made this and we humans are destroying our once beautiful world. We humans need to think about what animals we bring over to other countries and how we treat our earth. The dinosaurs went extinct because they couldn't adapt to the changes. Mother nature made them and then took them away. They survived for a very long time and now it's our turn but by the way we are destroying our world we won't last nowhere near as the dinosaurs. Mother Nature knows when to make a new species and when to end an older species but we humans are speeding up all the other animals extinction cycle. We don't know the future yet but I know it won't be pretty. Who knows about the dinosaurs? Maybe in a couple million years evolution and mother nature will work together and make something similar to the dinosaurs. The only unchanged dinosaur there is left is crocodiles. Their habits are not hanged even though their eniviroments, sizes and a few other factors are changed. The Cuban crocodile is very endangered in the wild. There aren't even 10,000 in the wild left. See what happens when we temper with the natural order of life?
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

WHAT ABOUT THE DINOSUARS WE NEVER SAW THEM WOULDNT BE HERE IF THEY WERE STILL AROUND
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: Evolutionists protect endangered species

Evolution is the theory of natural selection. The "survival of the fittest" is done in the context of the environment.Environmentalists should work to protect the habitat of all species by protecting their habitat from human destruction.There is nothing natural about turning a marsh into a parking lot and expecting the turtles to evolve into speed bumps.
Debate: Should people stop all efforts to save endangered species?
Side: No, continue saving them.

But some species can survive such a transition. The others should be left alone to live (and die) in peace.