azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

Well the fact that it's wrong to be gay in the first place...Why?The fact that marriage is a religious ceremony..Definitions of marriageA: the social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments, religious ceremonies, etc.B.a similar institution involving partners of the same gender: gay marriage.2.the state, condition, or relationship of being married; wedlock: a happy marriage.3.the legal or religious ceremony that formalizes the decision of two people to live as a married couple, including the accompanying social festivities: to officiate at a marriage.4.a relationship in which two people have pledged themselves to each other in the manner of a husband and wife, without legal sanction: trial marriage.5.any close or intimate association or union: the marriage of words and music in a hit song.6.a formal agreement between two companies or enterprises to combine operations, resources, etc., for mutual benefit; merger.7.a blending or matching of different elements or components: The new lipstick is a beautiful marriage of fragrance and texture....why would you bring something so immoral and irreligious into the picture?What exactly is immoral and irreligious about Homosexuality?You can call them butt-buddies, scissor-partners, bumchums etc. etc. but don't call them a married couple.Can I, thanks. I will reference you when I need to be a bigot.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

Definitions of marriageThis is where it might hurt your head.The dictionary isn't always right. The dictionary is written by a bunch of people that give the definition of words as they see it. You go to a different country and several words have different meanings. Go to a country with morals and you'll see that marriage is between man and wife and that it is a religious ceremony. However in this new day and age (i agree) it doesn't have to be purely religious. But irregardless it is between a man and wife.You cannot have a man and man or woman and woman or transexual and transexual or brother and sister or brother and father or brother and mother or sister and father or sister and mother or sister and sister or brother and brother or paedophile and young person or dead body and necrophile or a dog and a bestiality person.You see what I'm getting at?What exactly is immoral and irreligious about Homosexuality?.Lol you being serious?Can I, thanks. I will reference you when I need to be a bigot.Blah blah blah anybody that isn't accepting of all types of peoples is a bigot. Have fun advocating paedophilia.I'm not going to bother claling you a sick fuck cause I think all of you guys know you are...I need to come up with a new accurate word to describe you queers.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

The dictionary isn't always right. The dictionary is written by a bunch of people that give the definition of words as they see itAnd religious scripture is written by God, right?Go to a country with morals and you'll see that marriage is between man and wife and that it is a religious ceremony.I feel your idea of morality is twisted, please name a country with morals or one without for that fact.You cannot have a man and man or woman and woman or transexual and transexualWhy exactly can you not have these?or brother and sister or brother and father or brother and mother or sister and father or sister and mother or sister and sister or brother and brotherBy law siblings can not marry each other, this not the same as Homosexuality, incestuous behavior can create seriously deficient children therefore there is still a victim. Also there is not many siblings or parents of children wanting to marry each other, I am sure that there is very little people actually attracted to their siblings or parents, and should bare no mention in a debate on the right of two consenting adults to spend their lives together. Plus this is not the subject being debated.or pedophile and young person or dead body and necrophile or a dog and a bestiality person.Again victims involved so immoral.Lol you being serious?Was it not you that was harping on about the fact that Christianity and Islam are the only religions discussed/ considered in these debates, in an argument with me recently.Buddism is not against homosexuality, Neither is Hinduism Shinto does not outline any problems with it. And as for immoral it is only in the eyes of those too consumed in their own shit to ever empathize with another human.Blah blah blah anybody that isn't accepting of all types of peoples is a bigot. Have fun advocating paedophilia. The term bigot is ambiguous it can also mean one that is strongly partial to ones own group, etc, etc. Why would I advocate paedophillia, it wrong and immoral, Now, empathizing with a pedophile is something I could do, something I see from your post you will never do or be able to do. I'm not going to bother claling you a sick fuck cause I think all of you guys know you are...I need to come up with a new accurate word to describe you queers.Ohhhh, touchy, your name calling is sooooooooooo hurtful I think I might cry.Explain to me why you brand me a queer? or a sick fuck? This is where it might hurt your headMy head was OK, but thanks for the warning, your logical deduction is unique to say the least.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

So you're willing to discriminate against incest but not against homosexuality? Who's the bigot now?Again victims involved so immoral.So if there is not victim it's moral? Are you braindead?Buddism is not against homosexuality, Neither is HinduismLmao since when.Why would I advocate paedophillia, it wrong and immoralAnd homosexuality isn't? BIGOT ALERT PAEDOPHOBE ALERT!!
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

So you're willing to discriminate against incest but not against homosexuality?Did I say that?Who's the bigot now?I did not call you a bigot, but I am sure that you are. So if there is not victim it's moral? Are you braindeadName me something that is immoral that has no victim?Lmao since whenUhm, see linkAnd homosexuality isn't? BIGOT ALERT PAEDOPHOBE ALERT!NO it isn't. homosexuality is not wrong or immoral and views like yours will keep the world in the lingering dark ages for some time to come, as for your petulant name calling I will ask you this, are you suggesting that I am afraid of children? Besides the fact that I am not, I don't see its bearing on the debate. Do me a favor and respond to my posts, instead of quote mining like an ignorant fool.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

The link you posted?Kind of bullshit. Ever watched Scrottie Mcboogerballs? South Park where it shows how people read into things that aren't there?Hinduism is a tolerant religion. If things were like they should be or like the old days then I'm sure homosexuality could be tolerated. But things are not. Gays are constantly in your face sticking their sins into your face. Justifying their sins. Making others accept their sins. Legalising their sins. Trying to make gay marriage and then legalise it etc.If there wasn't any of that bullshit... with men sitting on each others laps in public etc. I don't think I'd say a word and let them be. Instead they're trying to get me and other people to allow them into our daily lives. Fuck that. Action = reaction. I'm not going tolerant on that.are you suggesting that I am afraid of children?Lmao wut????Anyway cockmuncher........you're gay.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

Gays are constantly in your face sticking their sins into your face. Justifying their sins. Making others accept their sins. Legalizing their sins. Trying to make gay marriage and then legalise it etc.Are they? I don't find that at all. Has a gay stuck his sin in your face? oh how telling.If there wasn't any of that bullshit... with men sitting on each others laps in public etc. I don't think I'd say a word and let them be. Instead they're trying to get me and other people to allow them into our daily lives.So because they do things that you don't like and they are not hurting you or anyone at all, you feel obligated to label them and protest against their rights to be happy. "Me thinks the lady does protest too much" if you know what I mean, their is a bit too much frequency in your protest when talking about homosexuals, which would lead to the inference that you are a closet homosexual. Anything you would like to confess? I think you would feel much better for it.Lmao wut????Peodophobe, fear of children or dolls, genius.Anyway cockmuncher........you're gay.That is news to me, I am sure my wife will be upset when she hears it. How should I tell her? I am sure you have prepared your coming out speech, any tips? You can label me all you want, it only makes you more of a bigot.The link you posted?Kind of bullshit. Ever watched Scrottie Mcboogerballs? South Park where it shows how people read into things that aren't there?Like hermeneutics religious scriptures of all kinds are open to interpretation, it is telling that some one such as your self will disregard teachings in favor of their own personal views, oh and I do agree with you on the South Park example all religious documents are misread generally because they are filled to the brim with bullshit and any cretin with a bent for justifying his own immoral stance quote mines from scripture then sets about ruining the lives of innocent people.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

I'd back out early if I were you .
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

Good so you agree that illicit sex is condemned by hinduism which means homosexuality is condemned.Glad we got that over with.You can label me all you want, it only makes you more of a bigot.Oh no! I'm a bigot. I'm so ashamed and terrified. Faggot.Are they? I don't find that at all.And IM the one in denial.Peodophobe, fear of children or dolls, genius.Ohh you're being gay again....So where are we?Homosexuality is immoral since time immemorialHomosexuality is condemned by 99% of all religionsHomosexuals are trying to make hetreosexual things their's i.e. marriage.Homosexuals are gay.You're gay.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

Good so you agree that illicit sex is condemned by hinduism which means homosexuality is condemned.Glad we got that over with.What I agree is that the scriptures are open to interpretation by anyone, just because a conventional wisdom points them in a certain way does not indicate their intent. What I was also stating is that they are written by men, in this respect they are flawed.Oh no! I'm a bigot. I'm so ashamed and terrified. FaggotThat is up to you.And IM the one in denial.Maybe you are, maybe you are not, but the matter of the fact is that homosexuals are here to stay, it is your choice to be bothered by them, although I don't see why you would as they are only living out their lives as they wish which is everyone right.Ohh you're being gay again....So by pointing out your mistake in the use of a word, I am attracted to people of the same sex, if you are unsure of what a gay person is I would advise checking it out before entering a debate about it.Homosexuality is immoral since time immemorialHomosexuality was a part of many ancient civilizations such as, Greece, Rome, China, etcHomosexuality is condemned by 99% of all religionsProbably true of most modern religions.Homosexuals are trying to make hetreosexual things their's i.e. marriage.Marriage between heterosexual couples is performed as both a religious and a legal ceremony, Gay couples do not get married in a religious ceremony so why would it bother you? Homosexuals are human the same as heterosexuals, should they not have the same rights?Homosexuals are gayIf you mean happy then I'm glad for them and wonder why you are not.If you mean they are homosexuals then there is nothing more to say other than Duuuhhhhh.You're gayIf you mean happy, yes I am. If you mean homosexual then no I am not, why would you consider me a homosexual? unless your gaydar is going off.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

Nearly all ancient civilisations/religions agree with me on most points.In China the Confunacists said that the first duty is to raise a family and take care of them and overlooked homosexuality if it was discreet and private.The Greeks said that those who penetrated were dominant and masculine and those who got penetrated (LOL!!!) were feminine and submissive.I could go on forever.. but none of the cultures allowed gay marriage.Not many had open gay relationsetc. etc.TBH they are generally in line with me. Good to know that.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

In China the Confunacists said that the first duty is to raise a family and take care of them and overlooked homosexuality if it was discreet and private.The Greeks said that those who penetrated were dominant and masculine and those who got penetrated (LOL!!!) were feminine and submissive.I could go on forever.. but none of the cultures allowed gay marriage.Not many had open gay relationsSo homosexuality isn't immoral since time immemorial, glad to see you agree on that.In ancient Greece the male form was considered the ideal of beauty and the ancient Romans were fond of rampant homosexuality. If there was no gay marriage then I don't see how it impacts now, do we still have gladiatorial events where people are killed for amusement, NO. Do we still have widespread slavery, NO. Do we still have a view of women as second class citizens, NO. (OK we still have these things in some more devoutly religious and obviously morally advanced:) countries.)But because of some all too conservative people, the rights of two people to be happy are denied based on out-dated texts and bigoted moral judgments. The fact that in the western world that the only real opposition to things like gay marriage comes from the religious communities is telling of their archaic and flawed morality. Gay people can not help being the way they are, it is not a belief system, or a choice it is an ingrained hormonally shaped sexuality, and if you are not this way you should count yourself lucky. Imagine being brought into a world where the very nature of yourself is ridiculed on any given day, where want you feel drawn to without explanation or choice is being chastised by huge groups of people, people that do not want to listen to evidence or reason, they KNOW they are right and that is that, and they WILL make your life hell because they deem themselves superior and in the right. A gay couple can not get married in a religious ceremony, so if they are not put together in the eyes of whichever God it is then it should not matter to the religious if Gay people had a legal ceremony or not. TBH they are generally in line with me. Good to know thatThey are not in line with you mate, as I said before in ancient Greece and Rome homosexuality was rampant and anyway even if ancient civilizations are in line with you then that shows where your morals stand, outdated and archaic.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

But because of some all too conservative people, the rights of two people to be happy Where do we have a right to be happy? I'm only happy if I'm not poor. Does that mean I have a right to money because it makes me happy?are denied based on out-dated texts and bigoted moral judgmentsWho says they're out-dated? Because you disagree they are out of date? If person x believes God says gay sex is wrong, why would that change over any number of years? Your dispute is that you don't believe God says that, but doesn't everyone have a right to religious freedom?And is it bigoted to say being gay is bad? If you believe fornication (sex out of marriage) is wrong, you believe that in all cases. If you believe gay sex is wrong you believe that in all cases. Does that make someone a bigot? I'd be willing to believe you think murder is wrong in all cases, does that make you a bigot?You are both arguing two separate points because you have two different life views. While one of you is probably right, it does not necessarily mean that the other is stupid or bigoted to believe in something different.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

I use the term "arguing" liberally here, this discussion fell apart a long time ago :)
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

How did it fall apart? Two people are standing by their principles, in this situation no-one is going to concede victory. But it is still fun to hash it out.The fact of the matter as I see it is your posts are tagged as No and you are disputing me so you are being bias in your criticism of the argument being had.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

Where do we have a right to be happy? I'm only happy if I'm not poor. Does that mean I have a right to money because it makes me happy?Everyone that is not hurting anyone else has the right to pursue their goals in life, and the things that make them happy. If you want money in life and you work to get it, and this is what makes you happy you are entitled to that. This is a right that you have, unfortunately a homosexual person in some parts of the world has no right to carry out their lives with the same dignity and respect awarded to a financial wizard.Who says they're out-dated? Because you disagree they are out of date?I do and so does a lot of other people, the fact of the matter is that some of the morals thought in a lot of religious texts are odious and out of line with modern understanding of humanity and our nature.If person x believes God says gay sex is wrong, why would that change over any number of years?It probably will not but the question is about Gay marriage and not sex. Your dispute is that you don't believe God says that, but doesn't everyone have a right to religious freedomWhether or not God said anything is irrelevant and i don't believe in God so I don't believe he said anything. Everyone has the right to religious freedom, a freedom granted that they respect other peoples rights and freedoms as well, including those of homosexuals to get married in a civil ceremony, one that does not involve any religious denomination, beliefs or rules.And is it bigoted to say being gay is bad?If you believe fornication (sex out of marriage) is wrong, you believe that in all cases. If you believe gay sex is wrong you believe that in all cases. Does that make someone a bigot?No, but it becomes so when you go out of your way to label and abuse Gay people.(The following are examples from the argument you are talking about)You can call them butt-buddies, scissor-partners, bumchums etc. etc. but don't call them a married couple.I need to come up with a new accurate word to describe you queersAnyway cockmuncher........you're gay.Faggot.Tell me if this is the reasoning of a religious person or a bigot.I'd be willing to believe you think murder is wrong in all cases, does that make you a bigot?Are you seriously equating murder with homosexuality?You are both arguing two separate points because you have two different life views.Is this not the point?While one of you is probably right, it does not necessarily mean that the other is stupid or bigoted to believe in something different.Like I have said belief is everyones right and I am not in the business of disputing that, but it is not the right of the religious to force their opinions on any one especially when it has nothing to do with religion.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

Everyone that is not hurting anyone else has the right to pursue their goals in life, and the things that make them happy.Says who? There is no written protection anywhere in the constitution saying so. It can be inferred, perhaps, but it is not a guaranteed right. As such, the majority can vote on this issue any way they like until the constitution is changed in a legal fashion (i.e. the legislative branch).Who says they're out-dated? Because you disagree they are out of date?I do and so does a lot of other peopleSo? Who are you? Who are they? I can find just as many people (more probably) who disagree with you. Who says your morals are better than theirs?a freedom granted that they respect other peoples rights and freedoms as well, including those of homosexuals to get married in a civil ceremony,Again, says who? All of these rights and guaranteed freedoms are nice to talk about, but they just don't exist.it becomes so when you go out of your way to label and abuse Gay people.Yes. This is actually what I mean when I said the argument had degraded. The descent into name calling was very immature. Most of my very best friends are gay and I take real offense to comments like these.Are you seriously equating murder with homosexuality?No, I'm using the logic of something you believe to be wrong to show you how religious people feel. Did you know that many religions believe homosexual acts are only one step down from murder? Many religions believe God destroys whole cities if they permit homosexuality. But more importantly, this is an attempt to put you in their shoes and show one reason why they have a right to vote to make homosexual marriage illegal.it is not the right of the religious to force their opinions on any one especially when it has nothing to do with religion.They have a right to vote their conscious, and it has everything to do with religion. Do you have a right to force your morality on them and have their tax dollars support something they find to be a crime next to murder?
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: No

your morals stand, outdated and archaic.No it means that their morals can still be applied today.homosexuality was rampantNow if that isn't exxageration I don't know what is....Do we still have a view of women as second class citizens, NONot many of these cultures did.do we still have gladiatorial events where people are killed for amusement, NO. Do we still have widespread slavery,Barbaric whites...Gay people shouldn't impose their way of life to normal people. They can do what they want behind closed doors and maybe normal people can overlook it. But sitting their justifying their sinful acts is disgraceful and disgusting.
Debate: Should gay marriages be allowable?
Side: yes

No it means that their morals can still be applied today.Which ones are you referring to, the Greeks or the Romans?Not many of these cultures did.http://greek-history.suite101.com/article.cfm/women_in_ancient_greece http://www.buzzle.com/articles/women-in-the-ancient-chinese-culture.html Gay people shouldn't impose their way of life to normal peopleDefine a normal person, last I checked everyone was different and all people are too be treated as equals.They can do what they want behind closed doors and maybe normal people can overlookIs there homosexual people doing anything overtly sexual in front of you all the time? Why should they have to hide and you not? But sitting their justifying their sinful acts is disgraceful and disgusting.It is a pity you feel this way as I guess it is only going to become easier for Gay people to go about their lives as straight people do. My last point on this farcical debate is that Homosexuals getting married in a civil ceremony and being viewed only legally should not enrage the religious. Religious people regard their marriage as a bond put together by their God as this is not the case of Homosexual marriage why would it matter, as they will be judged by whichever God the religious person is prescribing to, which should make them more comfortable with it as they should know that punishment will be served. I do not believe in any God or follow any religion therefore the comments I just made are purely an appeal to logic.