azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

If it is a book about culturs and geography and whatnot, than the book is far better. You would need to single-handedly conduct polls, research large swaths of peoples and draw out intricate maps of the landscape as you travel in order to match the knowledge compiled in a half descent book about any particular area.It's funny when people go someplace, stay in a westernized hotel for a weekend, and think they understand a country and however millions of people live there though.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

If you only learned about the world through traveling you would only know a fraction of what you would know through reading. Not to say you shouldn't travel, you should if you get the chance, but it would be unpractical to rely on traveling as your primary means of education. Traveling is too time-consuming and too cost ineffective for that purpose.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

Define "better"...better for who. No...test scores would drop!...lol.. I can have students memorize 10 facts while they are out playing in Italy and really experiencing and seeing culture. Studying a book geared towards the test is so much better. It would allow for the school to be considered "good" and continue receiving funding...lol... How crappy our system is!
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

I think it would work only in combination. In order to know where to go you have to read something about that country. Your enjoy of the country would be greater. For example, when I visited St. Petersburg I didn't think about history very much or great books such as 'Crime and Punishment' by Dostoevsky. But when I realized that I actually was at the same land as great people of the past. It thrilled me more than just being in this city. I really appreciate the words of St. Augustine who also compared traveling with reading: “The world is a book and those who do not travel read only one page.” But, visa versa, who never read about overseas territories never understand fully the pleasure of traveling.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

reading from book is much better than traveling cuz traveling will take more of ur time more of ur money and more tiredness .... but book wont do all these thing u dont need to be rich to by a book u dont need to be much free to read the book .... where u want and when u want u can read the book ,,, maybe 75% of people are not able to travel cuz they dont have money or time ......... so my idea is reading is much better than traveling :)
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

Going places will not give you a better understanding of the world. It will definitely give you an idea of what other cultures do, but it will not help you understand why the cultures do what they do, which is what truly understanding something means.Textbooks go into the background of occurrences, seeing the world will mostly only give you information about the foreground.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

all have dreams to go around the world but everything needs money!
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

I think reading is way better than traveling cause I think traveling, first and foremost will take take a lot of money. Of course not all of us are rich. Sometimes we can't just afford the money so we read books. and going to a specific country, we all will just boast that we have gone their instead some people wouldn't have even understood the culture. So, reading books is much pleasure than having a long time travel.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

no travelling all around the world is not good because you have a limited coverage you wont get all the ideas about the country and reading books we will get multiple points from different authors
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

travelling around the world takes lot of time and you will also feel tired
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

for example in one year you could read about 15 countries but can you travel to all these countries ? certainly not
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

can you travel from Delhi all the way to Kerala no right you could read about the places in the books
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

Anything you prefer, both are useful. You can initially read from printed materials such as books and other travel guide then travel after learning things from it, or travel first then learn their culture at the same time using cultural books of their own. There are man printable travel guides and books online, you can have them reprinted at http://www.digitekprinting.com/.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

Reading a book is better than traveling because when reading a book we can develop ideas with life experiences from the information we read. Reading is the best source of information, books have been around for hundreds of years, the pen and paper has been around a lot longer than airplanes and advanced means of transportation. Sometimes, you can learn about other people's experiences through their writings, and then you can apply the life lessons they shared and benefit from them.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

Reading a book can give insights into a society and the inner workings of a culture that being a traveler may certainly not grasp.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

'GROUP A' JUST SAID A QUOTE ABOUT EINSTEIN . FROM WHERE DID U GET THE QUOTE?? OBVIOUSLY FROM INTERNET OR BOOKS. WE CANNOT GET THAT INFORMATION FROM TRAVELING AROUND THE WORLD. LET US THE TAKE THE CASE OF BLIND PERSON, IN ORDER TO LEARN HE HAS TO READ THE BRAILLE SCRIPT ALSO TO LEARN ABOUT THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY WE ARE DEPENDED ON OUR BOOKS
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

Yes, you are right but everything is important and now I would like to tell you that I also love to travel and nowadays I am getting some information about the https://traveldefend.com/ website which can help you with travel insurance. That's nice.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

When scientists develop 'cleaner/greener' batteries, ( which they will) with a much extended range than present technology permits, then yes. The elimination/meaningful reduction in the enormous amounts of co2 gas we pump into the atmosphere is contributing significantly to the ''meltdown'' of the ice on the north and south poles causing rising sea levels, as well as other severe weather conditions throughout the world. Of course there are other factors contributing to 'climate change', which is a euphemistic term for ''climate catastrophe'', not least of which nature itself, but to date we have only been tinkering with the problem and have failed miserably in even slowing the present progress to climate disaster.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

We as humans lack the intelligence to realize the consequences of our action until the consequences knock on our front door. That being said we should switch from petroleum to electric car before the warnings of global warming become reality. What good will any car be if it is 10 feet under water?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

with respect, Intelligence has nothing to do with foresight. and your statement seems to insinuate that only dumb people could make a decision that causes intense harm in the long run. Thomas Midgley is a key example to counter your point. the man was an engineer, but still pioneered the use of CFC's and leaded gasoline. in his time he was decorated, a brilliant inventor, and a brilliant man. but later discoveries said "Oh no muh environments!"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThomasMidgleyJr.-----Why would the car be 10ft underwater?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

With much respect back, if that's what it seemed like I implied to you that wasn't my intention. One sentence can mean a million and one things. A prime example is the Constitution, people read the same words but all get different interpretations. No website needed that was off the top of my head :). My point being is if that's how you interpretated my words, that's not how I meant for them to be interpretated and that wasn't my original intentions. Getting back on topic to the main argument , to clarify the cars would be 10 feet underwater because of the impacts of global warming. To better clarify, global warming is theorized to cause water levels to rise causing most of the planet to be submerged in water which will result in most cars being underwater as well.What's your reasoning for supporting gasoline cars over electric cars?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Why would the water levels rise?-I choose petrol cars because they are abundant. and you don't need much knowledge in order to fix or tune one. while it's true, that you need no Oil or spark plugs, the fact that I cannot fix an electric car turns me off to it. but if I was living closer to the city, I could see where electric would be cheaper and more efficient. one lifestyle won't work for us all.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

While an electric car may not give us all that we would desire in a car, it is very wise to opt this alternative, considering the limited amount of fossil fuels on earth.. But that doesn't mean we completely stop using v8s. I feel that in a planned and organised manner, finding a perfect balance between using the two can give us maximum advantages. Sure, this would only be true until we find methods of making electric cars more advanced, taking account of all that we desire and making an electric car of that kind which would then be the best option available.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

go to electronic cars is most important for environment . today we forcing environment issues such as green house gas , growing temperature . electric car is good for environmental issues to solving problem . I want to drive on electronic car . development in electric car is grow up rather than we think . car can drive over 300 kilometer which can drive LA to SF .
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

You should walk...................................................................
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Do you have a woman tied up wearing a long dress and bun hair SaintNow? Of course you do. You're a cultist.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

pervert, you need to be saved from Hell. God the Savior will save you if will believe from your heart that He died for your sins and is risen bodily from the dead, and you ask God in Jesus' name to forgive you and save you from Hell.....then He will make you a new creation and you will want to be clean and not be a pervert.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Judge not lest you be judged, for by the measure you judge, you shall be judged.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

You don't look like a "new creation". You look like the people in the Bible who killed Jesus. And you most certainly aren't loving your enemies nor your neighbor. Of course we both know that no one is this far gone. You are an atheist troll.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Um, pardon me, I don't think I was talking to you and by reading only three words of your pose I can tell it's nothing I care to read further.Thank you, have a nice day outside of Hell, I hope you get saved before it's too late...or is it too late for you already?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Um, pardon me, I don't think I was talking to you and by reading only three words of your pose I can tell it's nothing I care to read further.Thank you, have a nice day outside of Hell, I hope you get saved before it's too late...or is it too late for you already?Oh, I guess I was talking to you.....pointing out that you ate a pervert.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

You're a pervert .
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Being a pervert is not worth more than life, stop being a pervert, repent of your sin and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved and not fry like an eternal sausage in Hell where perverts go.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

You be a pervert. You's been da humpin me leg sense you gets here.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Smell my finger. *
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Will you always be a pervert and fry like an eternal sausage in Hell? Yes or no please.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

You doesn't even knows wat the hell be. Dat Jesus no talk plainly but in da parables.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

yes it will prevent global warming and reduce pollution so we should all drive electric vehicles.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

yes as traditional fuels cause lots of pollution and also they are about to extinct
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

You should know that we have found electric cars to be not nearly as "Green" as was first thought.Seems the manufacturing process of those batteries they run on releases far more toxins into the environment than just simple carbon monoxide emissions that are emmited from your standard internal combustion engine.I do not recall the exact specs (feel free to look 'em up) but I think it was something along the lines of, ONE battery puts as much harmful products, like lead and arsenic and acids, into the environment as do TEN regular cars that are each driven 1000 miles.So, no, gimme my V8.I feel......feel.....The need...........For Speed!!!LOLSS
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

That is a good point. Adding on to that, electric cars do mean that there should be more battery charging stations rather than having gas stations. This means that people would have to build more of these stations and more money would be spent.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Well if people have to build more electric stations that will result in more jobs, so that money being spent wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing especially considering it most likely wouldn't come out of the pockets of those who want to buy a eletric car.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

WTF. building stations helps the economy. Building anything helps the economy. Maybe anything but a wall, though.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

While if that were true, which its not, I would agree with you, but truth is vehicles that run on gasoline far outweigh the carbon produced than electric cars. It is true that the production of electric cars do produce toxin, but to say it outweighs that's of a vehicle that runs on gasoline is nothing but a myth. It has been proven by studies that countries with more electric car actually produce less carbon emissions than those with "regular" cars. (There's no such thing as a regular car buts that's a completely different argument). To further rebuttle your argument you stated "ONE battery puts as much harmful products...into the enviorment as do TEN regular cars that are driven 1000 miles" ten multiplied by 1000 is 10,000 which really isn't a lot of milage for a car I can't remember a day if ever that I saw a car with such a small amount of milage on it. Electric cars aren't perfect but sticking with gasoline cars will solve nothing.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Maybe they aren't as "green" as we thought, but they sure are better than the v8.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Electric cars burn fossil fuels, too. The production of electricity requires the burning of fossil fuels.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

What if you live in an area that runs of renewable energy and/or nuclear energy?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Well that's obviously when you take your head, shove it in a toilet bowl, flush, and make liberal noises like a chimpanzee donkey mule.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

The creation of electric cars do require fossil fuels, but the overall toxins released into the atmosphere is far less than that of a gasoline car. Come on bud join the electric car side we have fresh air :)
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Until you have a dump filled with acidic batteries and you can't even drink the water.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

No. The electric car causes a pollution that liberals are too stupid to know about or understand. It's worse. Go look it up.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

Electric cars are more energy efficient but what you really doing is shifting your energy source from a gas plant to a power plant. This can put more CO^2 in the air. Also the batteries for electric cars are made from metals that have a LOT of mining involved. Putting the car together also makes more greenhouse gasses.The only advantage of having an electric car (at least some models) allow you to drive in the carpool lane without the minimum amount of people. I think the earth it self maters though.So lets keep my V8
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

No way. Electric cars should drive us... *
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

I'm all for alternative energy sources as well as alternative transportation. HOWEVER, I see a lot of carelessness for the environment as we go about these green ideas. Just think of all those batteries in all those cars. All the acids and toxins. And though much may be recycled still think of the careless behaviors which already exist now with disposing green batteries and light bulbs. Heck lots of people throw lots of stuff in the regular trash that they're not supposed to. Electric car parts will be too. Or they'll leach out from old cars people leave sitting in the corner of their property.When gasoline automobiles burst into popularity no one truly appreciated the depth of pollution which would compile decades later. That's in part why we now have car emission laws and tighter landfill rules. Heck, when everyone used horse and carriage we had horse poop everywhere and the switch to gas cars was considered a healthy altnernative. Our switch now from gas to electric cars again is assumed to be the healthier alternative, but will we still think so in 2035 when cadmium and mercury poisoning has creeped into water supplies almost everywhere?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

We should all ride unicorns. Women should also have 3 breasts.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

I don't want to be shocked for the complete duration of my drives.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Surely you dont truly believe someone would create a car that would shock the drivers, do you?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

I believe that anything that can be created ,might be created.
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

Well that's true, but realistically speaking do you believe someone would create a car that shocks you to make profit?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: no I like my V8

I already answered that question. Are you blind?
Debate: should we all drive electric cars
Side: yes go electric

That would be pretty funny. Personally, I wouldn't mind a car that shocks the driver when he/she is on a cell phone while driving.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Sure thing! But I'd love if an airplane could designate a small place in the back that's soundproof. It could be their playpen. ;)
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

hey, i would wanna play in there to except for the shit smell that would be in there
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: No

At any moment I am satisfied that I fly business class. I try to relax in comfort and now I am looking for a reliable company to connect my flights and save money. I don't want to waste my time on this.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: Yes

Especially when you are traveling with a child, business class is a must. I often use the competitive offers I find on https://businessclassconsolidator.com/ and they are often better than other platforms. While chatting with friends about great deals on business class flights, I learned that the company has proven itself on the positive side and has established partnerships with leading travel service providers, consolidators and major airlines. I am satisfied with our cooperation, and I am pleased to come to them again and again.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Why shouldn't they be? They're allowed to travel and take up no seat. The only bother they can be is if they're sick or crying which doesn't happen with that much frequency.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: Yes

ooops Im sorry I didn't make a "Yes" side. I'll fix it. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

I have heard a lot of people say they shouldn't be allowed because they scream and that's very annoying. But adults can also be annoying, should we not let them on the plain? Should there be an annoyance test? Actually that sounds like a great idea. (; jkLast time I flew there was a baby screaming the whole time. So I just put my headphones in and turned some of my favorite music way up. I didn't even notice. Felt sorry for everyone els though.And not to mention the huge inconvienience it would cause for parents.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

should sick people be in planes? should babys be in a moving car? ask yourself these questions. i think that will answer your question.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

For every reason why they shouldn't there is another why they should of equal merit.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Yes, after all some of them were conceived on airplanes. This message paid for by the "Mile High Club". Not affiliated with the "Frequent Flyer's Club". All rights implied or expressed are property of "The Mile High Club". No part of this shall be reprinted without permission.
Debate: Should babies be allowed on airplanes?
Side: yes

Well... how else do you expect babies to get to their destination? Bus? Train? Hitch Hiking?