azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Galileo Galilei always said science and religion were never meant to go against each other so yes. Remember, it was the primarily the roman catholics who refused to see this connection, claiming science is the work of the devil and a "heresy". They still to this day believe the earth is flat and their current pope is a fool to believe homosexuality is scientifically proven to be useful because it isn't as homosexuality/bisexuality already causes AIDs/HIV. Why is heterosexuality so important? Because it brings more humans into this world and without that, the human race will go extinct. That's science right there. Biology is supremely what people need to realize is connected to God's creations. God never made people homosexual nor bisexual nor trans abomination wise, people choose to make choices and in this case, choosing sodomy is the wrong choice with consequences. While choosing the right is to be heterosexual and to be married before having sexual relations. Sex outside of marriage brings harmful situations such as the challenging choice of abortion because the man and the woman refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Evolution doesn't fit in also because the DNA proves otherwise. Science really did disprove Darwinism and it will continue to be debunked while fools will always rely on the delusion that evolution exists when it does not. Animals never evolved into another form; for example, apes never evolved into humans so humans and apes are separate species. Cockroaches never became dinosaurs just because they existed before dinosaurs. Darwinism has and always will remain a theory. Science and creationism go more together than you'd all think. Ken Ham and Henry M Morris have both disproven Darwinian evolution by a mile.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Batman, you are flat out insane. You are literally dangerously mad. Please don't ever have children.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Your hypocrisy is always exposed the moment you start insulting, lying and slandering. Your arguments are strawmen, weak and hypocritically invalidated. Cry me a river and get over it. You are the pure example of an insane patient. You don't even know facts/truth from reality and you call me insane? It's typical for a wretched hypocritical snowflake like you to insult a man of common sense such as I. I have more facts than you and you will always be silenced as soon as you start spewing bullshit. It is also an absolute objective universal fact that creationists can be scientists and that science itself has evidence to support that God created all things. There is no hint of evidence that supports insane evolution. There is no trace of DNA in human beings that are connected to apes. These are scientific findings that Another-Alt aka Bipolar alt denies, which makes him the elephant in the room crying insanity insanity insanity.Watch yourself, ape-alt, you got yourself in your own grave and the more you scream at me for speaking absolute objective universal facts, the more you dig deeper into it. You're already a condemned idiot by your own selfish narcissistic behavior. You will continue to be destroyed by the truths that I speak. Morality is objective and it exists because of God. Right and wrong exists. Good and evil exists. Another-Alt is an example of evil and will be destroyed on a huge scale constantly. All trolls will be destroyed and silenced by the truth.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science is morally neutral. So this question is pretty stupid.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

No questions are stupid.*
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science without a moral and human purpose to inform it will be monstrous, that's the whole point of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, we may end committing genocide in the pursuit of knowledge, the question is if the pursuit is worth the cost? I would hope not, not ever, we need to question if we are worthy of knowledge if we would sacrifice our soul for it? The answer is simple, no, being a monster destroys our worthiness.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science cannot answer anything in the realm of morality because when you dive into morality that falls under the categories of philosophy, theology, etc. Science cannot tell you what it morally right and wrong.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science can actually answer many questions in the realm of morality and that science is called psychology, also with the help of Neuroscience. In the same way for example that psychologist can determine if a person has psychopathic tendencies which is mostly about the lack of empathy; in many cases This specific part of your brain is called the the right supra-marginal gyrus. When this brain region doesn't function properly—or when we have to make particularly quick decisions—the researchers found one’s ability for empathy is dramatically reduced. This area of the brain helps us to distinguish our own emotional state from that of other people and is responsible for empathy and compassion.But if we're gonna take logic with no science references I think when it comes to morality science is the closest thing that can explain or interpret our moral compass because science is about evidence and proof and studying multiple cases before coming to any conclusions which is more co-existence with morality than any other method created by mankind.Many people claim that Religion is a better answer for human's morality, as much as I would like to agree with this point because it would be much easier to determine which acts are moral and which are immoral by just reading it from a book but I can't really Agree for the reason that different religions has different books which makes them have different moral reasons for certain acts. which makes the morality dependable on what the person has been taught from a young age, or what societies claims moral reasoning for certain immoral acts, like Honor killings for example is a very big issue where I come from and the Killer can go without an equivalent punishment for the homicide he committed just because culturally it is in some way acceptable to kill your sister or wife if you caught her in the act of having sex with another man. and that's not just in a court of law, its also acceptable in society which sometimes even praise this act and make parents or relatives of the killer even proud of his doing.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science can actually answer many questions in the realm of morality and that science is called psychology,Indeed.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Psychology is philosophical not really scientific as there aren't really facts and truths in psychology. Most refer to psychology as a pseudoscience.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

And here we have another ignorant fool who does not understand the "is/ought" problem.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Psychology is formal in nature, like Law, science deals in substantial facts, like evidence, you can present evidence in court, but that doesn't make science the grand arbiter of guilt and innocence, the court owes its cases their rights, to defend themselves, explain themselves, to identify the actual causality of an action such evidence establishes.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Moral and honorable things can be done with science as well. I am alive today because of neuorscience.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The fact that science cannot answer all of the questions in the field of Ethics, it does not mean it cannot co-exist with it.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science must report what is true about nature or it is immoral. In the true presentation of facts it is moral, and those facts can be observed, tested, repeated for anybody to see. Abuses of science are immoral while true presentation of facts, even when science is abused and immoral, is moral.Usually, when people want to rule morality out of science, it's because they want to mutilate babies for research.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

You cannot tell what science is or not. Just not lest ye be judged little boy preacher!
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You can tell what science is. Get a dictionary if you are having a problem with being able to tell what science is. Idiot.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You cannot tell what science is or not.Yes, I can. Here, I found a definition for you.the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The question isn't so much, can Science replace morality, it is can the two as separate entities co-exist?
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Yeah, that's the problem buddy that you analyse everything from point of view of theology and it's the religion which sets the rules. now set rules according to science we'll know what is morally right or wrong including you.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

I agree. Everyone has their own interpretation of philosophy and theology, it is a very gray area. Science on the other hand is very black and white, which is a good thing in my opinion, because if it weren't for the clarity of science, scientists would put unfair biases on discoveries that may not have enough evidence to back it up. However, it is true that nothing in science is definite. Everything is an estimation backed up by evidence, but that is not saying that the theory is definitely correct, or incorrect. Also, the biosphere is always changing, and that is where science is subdivided into different categories, in which different people study different things. Also, it depends on what someone's definition of morality is. If their definition of morality is "do good", then of course they can co-exist. If their definition is religion, then even then they can co-exist, because they compliment each other. Take the Bible, in the beginning, it is discussed how everything developed (evolution) from the sea. This actually is backed up by a scientific perspective, where the first cells were created by the bonding of amino acids. One of the rules of cells is that they can not just form, they have to come from other cells, and again for most things, there is no definite definition, or definite theory that can stand alone without biblical and other religion's values and what they believe is right. Now if our definition of morality is Medieval thinking like the dark ages, then no. They can not co-exist because in this instance, they did not compliment each other, they defied each other, because they believe that the only option was the Bible, and everything else was heresy.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

This isn't really in either side though, it is almost arguing both sides
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Everyone has their own interpretation of philosophy and theology, it is a very gray areaAgreed.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The thing is, science doesn't try to dictate morality. This doesn't mean that science cannot be used morally. In that respect, they co-exist.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science cannot answer anything in the realm of moralityMorality can't answer anything in the realm of science.because when you dive into morality that falls under the categories of philosophy, theology, etc.Philosophy and theology are both sciences.Science cannot tell you what it morally right and wrong.Nor can morality tell you what's scientifically right and wrong.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You're presenting a false dichotomy..............................................................
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

It depends on the situation. I believe science can be conducted in a morally correct manner. Meh.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

And morality cannot tell you what is scientifically right and wrong. What's your point? The question isn't asking if one can explain the other, it's asking whether or not both can exist at the same time.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

I am in agreement with the fact that science cannot tell you what is right and wrong, it only tells you what is. Morality is an interpretation made by humans on the basis of what is more beneficial.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Prove that! What if it can? What if science can prove right and wrong?! For you to say it can't is to say that it's wrong... HAHAHAHAHA
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

When it comes to science, you can't put good or bad in a test tube, and test it. It falls into the categories of what I said above.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

This is why our culture is dying. The Left hs done all in it's power to separate God from our public, and without God, mankind has no clue of morality.The first thing they say is Whose Morals? No man can agree on what is moral and what is immoral. This is why we now have nine States making No Restriction abortions legal! We have millions of Democrats voting for the Democrat Party that keeps it legal to do so.Our nation's majority Christian faith once lifted up the obvious values that created strong committed families. We had no need for a Government playing mother and father to our children.Without faith in God, we see our welfare roles filled with unwed mothers. We see record numbers of people living off food stamps.Nations fall from within and America is doing the same. We are going bankrupt supporting people that once supported themselves. This is how important moral values are to a nation.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

without God, mankind has no clue of morality.Are you suggesting that believing in God is guaranteeing all actions done by the believer are done with morality?That people who don't believe in God will automatically have no morals?
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

I am saying exacty wat I said. Without God, a nation has no morl foundation to stnd on. Without moral alues being lifted up, a nations value fall into the gutter as we are seeing.Christians are not perfect and have sinned. The difference is that even though we have sinned, we do not say our sins are ok. We do our best to always improve our faults and live up to the vaues from our Christian faith.Mankind without God refuses to admit his sins because in his no fault world, anything goes.One night hook ups, living together with no committments to their children, promiscuous sex, etc. etc. are no problem in man's world.Christians do not want moral laws. What we want is for our nation hold onto moral values tht helps all people. We want them to care about our children and try to live in ways that does not harm children or others who must pay for the irresponsible lifestyles.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You're talking to a friend of witches. They are not strangers to breeding babies to be sacrificed in Satanic rituals.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

They are not strangers to breeding babies to be sacrificed in Satanic rituals.Yes they are strangers to that, but since it's your mind that thought of such a disgusting thing, it seems you aren't.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Maybe they hide it from you, or you are hiding it for them...witches don't care much about telling the truth.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

I think you should work on finding your sanity.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Okay, let me put it another way....either you are totally naive, willfully ignorant, or knowingly trying to keep the lid on to cover for witches who use women to breed babies for sacrifice in Satanic rituals.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Probably totally naive.......you don't want to know the evil of Wicca, witchcraft, Satanism. They are your friends, and you love them as you love your own sin.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

There are some days where you are just so absolutely boring, it's astounding. Your ignorance is pretty amazing though so congratulations on keeping that up.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You are a friend of witches, in league with devils and I am not interested in your witchy comments.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Yet you respond every time. To be fair, I have never heard of my comments being "witchy" normally it's one letter difference when I'm being snarky.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You need to be saved from Hell and stop being friends with witches.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You and your witch friends can cast your spells all the way to Hell if you want to. You're on your way there, trying to justify yourself. Jesus is risen from the dead bodily, He is alive, He is God and He will be your Judge as you reject Him as your Savior by insisting He is not risen from the dead. It's you who is not rising from the dead. Enjoy your witch friends while you can, since you love your sin more than life.Amen. That's good preaching.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

LOLOL Almost a day later. I wonder if that's been something you've been sitting on this whole time. Now that you got that out of your system I hope you feel better! XD
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

I hope you get saved from Hell, but you seem to think you can justify yourself by telling yourself how wonderful you and your witchy friends are....it's impossible to justify your life, you can only justify eternity frying like a sausage in Hell as a sinner.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

No, moron, he is stating that without God, what is moral cannot be know. Learn to read.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The Left hs done all in it's power to separate God from our public, and without God, mankind has no clue of morality.That's not true at all.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

I am alive because of neuroscience....................................................................................................
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

There is something in the middle that science and morality can't co-exist . The intrest which comes to the scientists in the experiments takes them far away from the point of morality . Scientists do experiments on animals , on land which if seen with the point of morality is wrong but for welfare it's right . Bomb tests are executed in which lands soil etc is destroyed which is not in favour of morality but yeah it's in favour of welfare protection etc so it can be said that there isn't a co existence between both
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

No science and morality cant co exist because there are many situation when science become fail. Like that in case of the topic of soul science says that there is nothng about soul but in reality soul exist so that science cant explain all problem in this nature
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

No. They can not co-exist.The reason being that Science can not tell you what morality is.Can Science explain why I shouldn't rape women? No. According to science, I'm just spreading my seed. It does not dictate why I shouldn't rape women. In nature, animals rape each other (Of course not all the time, but it does happen) and again, according to Science, that's just what happens. But we all know that rape is wrong. Why is it wrong? That's what science can't answer. Morality is an abstract thing; the difference between right and wrong. The word "Science" originates from Latin, which means "Knowledge" We have KNOWLEDGE that rape occurs. Is it moral to rape? No. Can science tell you that? No.In conclusion, Science and morality are two completely separate things, and anyone who says otherwise has not spent the time thinking about the subject.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

No, because in order for science and morality to coexist it must centre itself around philosophy and religion which hold basic morale that science ignores or is not a part of, combining science with religion, morality and philosophy would destroy the whole point of science, to discover new things and seek out the truth behind the universe's biggest questions.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

The point of science is to observe and understand nature. If the scientist is not moral, then the data and his or her opinions about that data cannot be trusted. if you exclude morality from science, you have no way of knowing if the things presented by scientists are true or not......and you will probably believe them when they tell you that you descended from some sort of primate critter and you are exonerated in death so that God cannot hold you guilty of your sins in the fire of Hell.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science presents facts and nothing more. It does not form the truth. That is something that rests only with God.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

Science presents facts and nothing more. It does not form the truth. That is something that rests only with God.By your own (il)logic God is not a fact because science is unable to present God as a fact. Hence, you have raised a dichotomy between facts and non-facts, and seem to be insisting that the non-facts are factual (i.e. "truth"), while the facts do "not form the truth".In sum, you have a mental illness.
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

You speak very true things here. You are the best arguer in the last century!
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: Yes, of course.

How you can say that?! Who you are to know the 'truth' then?Did God make himself be true as he is the source of truth? What a bimbo argument!!!!!!!Only the lowest kind of person do the 'prove itself true' argument!
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

You have an interesting screenname...............................................................................................................................................................................
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science and morality can never co-exist because we all have seen the top class people are dominating the field of science and they care only for money as trend of artificial intelligence is going on..People are getting thrown out from their posts and machines are doing work of humanity but we forgot to mention important issue if everyone will be fired by company than who will buy their products?People will be jobless
Debate: Can Science and Morality co-exist?
Side: No way.

Science and morality can seemingly co-exist but with a cost of limited improvement in both terms. The question would be more appropriate by changing it into , "Should science and morality co-exist?". For instance, in order to push human's physical limit science need to conduct some unethical things like playing with DNA sequence to create improved embryo.