Debate: Should creationism and intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?
Side: Should NOT be taught

1) Let's assume evolution is fact, and not just a theory. Trust me, spare me your "no its fact" I believe in evolution, all it does is describe a process. When someone says evolution is only a theory, they show that they have no understanding of what a theory is in science. A scientific theory is backed up by considerable amounts of evidence, it isn't what the general use of the term theory is. I am not sure what relevance your point 'all it does is describe a process' has.And creationism simply/complexly states that something created/allowed for such a process to happen to begin with.On the other end, they state, nah, it was just chance, and on the other they state, nah, it was not chance and was in fact an existence put/set in place.  None of this has any relevance as to whether or not something is true. Evolution is not "just chance" anyway, natural selection is the driving force of evolution which isn't chance at all.3) That's what the argument is here. Lets not talk about crusades and all the fucking wars, what's the point in that?Please tell me where I mentioned the crusades or any other war?4) So when science says "they don't know" due to lack of "evidence (physical, ECT)" they also say "until there is evidence to know, we say 'we don't know'" and then when a person comes along and says "I believe in god", they say "well we don't know for sure because we've got no evidence (physical), so we don't know." yet in the same breathe they'll say "We can't prove god does not exist, nor can we prove it does exist, therefore, we don't know/there is no god"... That first part is exactly right, that is exactly what people should do. If someone saw a rainbow and had no evidence as to what causes it, you should say I don't know, not It is a magical snake or God did it or say it is anything else because you have no reason to think it is any of them.Responding to the second half of what you said even though it has nothing to do with what this debate is about, if there is no evidence for something where we should find evidence for it, that is evidence against that thing. That is the case for many Gods, but some Gods are unfalsifiable and because of this it is not a meaningful idea because if something is unfalsifiable you cannot determine whether or not it is true.5) If science says "I do not know" that does not mean there is not something to know. Where does it state on the "Book of The Universe And Beyond" and whatever science does not know, can't be true? This is the argument here.You do enjoy attacking straw men, you continuously do this. No one says that because science says I don't know that means there is nothing to know. The word I don't know doesn't mean that. No one has said that because science doesn't know something, it cant be true, this is just you attacking straws. Lets just say science didn't know that germs caused diseases ( just to let you know this is just a theory too), and they didn't have any evidence as to what causes them, this does not mean that if someone said that if someone proposed the germ idea that they were wrong, it just means that we cannot say that we know germs are causing it unless we have evidence for it being caused by them. Do you understand now?6) Regardless of whether a child is taught in school or not, the concept/fact of belief in a god(s) will always be existent. So long as curiosity is within the DNA, and consciousness, of the human being, people will continue to believe in god. So why separate it? It's inevitable. Whether in schools, in the library, online, books, movies, what the hell ever that curiosity will remain. I hope faith ( faith as in belief without evidence) isn't with us for ever, that it just me being optimistic but hopefully it will disappear. Also curiosity is what drives science so if this ever disappears so will science. Even if belief in Gods is always around, this does not mean that it has any truth in it or should be part of science. It could be that people believing in astrology (which is a load of rubbish) might stay with us forever, but this doesn't mean we should incorporate it it into science, people believe a lot of rubbish and always have. 7)Science can't claim everything, it took has its flaws.Science doesn't claim everything, but it is the only method we have for determining what is true about the world and it is incredibly successful at doing that.