Debate: is god true?
Side: no ,god is not true

Science doesn't only apply to natural phenomena.You may state this Ad nauseam, but Science does not apply to the supernatural. No matter how much you don't like it.Therefore the understanding of knowledge is not simply restricted to the testable and repeatableAll science must have the ability to test it's subject matter. I don't know what you are referring to with the statement "understanding of knowledge". Please elaborate.I am not wrong, you are basing your assumption from the natural sciences that does not apply to all science!There are two major branches of science. Natural Science and Social Science. Natural science covers fields such as biology, chemistry, astonomy, geology etc... Social sciences include Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology, etc....Both branches of science utilize the scientific method, which even you admitted precludes the supernatural.The only other "science" is pseudoscience, which by definition is something which only 'appears' to be scientific, but does not follow scientific methodology (ie scientific method).Give me a definition of real science. Quote a source for me to review. If not you are merely speaking on conjecture, in which you have no sources to equate your statements.Columbia Encyclopedia:science [Lat. scientia=knowledge]. For many the term science refers to the organized body of knowledge concerning the physical world, both animate and inanimate, but a proper definition would also have to include the attitudes and methods through which this body of knowledge is formed; thus, a science is both a particular kind of activity and also the results of that activity.sci·ence   /ˈsaɪəns/ Show Spelled[sahy-uhns] Show IPA–noun1.a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws 2.systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation. It would not be possible in natural science. I was hypothesizing a way to study the supernatural sciences. You can't claim all of science, I have explained and cited my reasons. You have yet to cite a counter to my argument over what science is, and what naturalism applies too.There is no accepted field as "supernatural science", recognized by any credible organization. It does not exist. It's an oxymoron, an etymological contradiction. So perhaps in your fictional, made-up field of "supernatural-sciences" it would be possible to measure miracles, but not in real science.Please expand on your theory.It's not my theory, nor is it just one theory, You should read up on Psychoanthropology. Parts of our cerebral functioning can be traced to our neolithic past. Our very way of thinking was guided by human evolution. Pareidolia is a good example of this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PareidoliaWhat is this evidence? Please list a source. Vedic sanskrit texts such as the Rigveda dates to about 1500 BC.The Torah was written 1312 BCThis little statement intrigued me. Who are you to comment on one's vocabulary.{Laughs}Easy firecracker, take that comment with a little tongue in cheek. As a veteran myself, four years active duty and two deployments to Iraq. I am curious about your MOS? I was a 19K Armor Crewman on a M1A2 SEP tank.I would not envy you, but I appreciate the importance of some good old fashioned armor. I was a 42A human resources specialist, but now I am 38B Civil Affairs Specialist.My question is, why are you enlisted when you have a post graduate degree? This seems very strange that you would not be an officer.Civilian education, has a promotion points cap which I have already exceeded. Although I could go Officer, I don't really want to. I rather enjoy the enlisted side.