azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

"I still stand by my point that NO WAR is justified."So declaring war with Germany in 1939 wasn't justified?
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

i agree with what ur saying about democracy but i still think woman should have the right to fight when we already do its just not offical
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

That's not true. Animals do battle- over territory, over mates, over prey, over water- over anything and everything. Yes, we take it to a new level, but we're still just a continuation Humans are smarter, more creative, more technologically advanced, more empathetic- and more capable of fighting over things all animals fight over.Also, please proofread!
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

So what if it wasent called a war? it would only be people fighting for defense of their land, their livelihoods, or their human rights. The actions of those fighting and the reason should be more important than the three letters, w a r.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

I agree that a woman's place is to nurture and to build civilization. It's in her nature to be equal with Mother Nature. Just think of it, in one minute Mother Nature can reap havoc on the entire planet. So in sense, the description of Earth as a Mother is entirely correct, she is the ultimate warrior!You want to see a real battle fought in ancient times then read the Mahabharata War or the 18 chapters of the Bhagavad Gita.Women did not fight except if they disguised themselves to seek revenge for some injustice committed by some man on the enemy side; thus her opportunity to avenge herself presented itself. War is never good no matter what era it occurs in. But Ancient warfare had more honor and pride than contemporary warfare. You had to be a martial artist skilled in horse riding, elephant control, and different strategic formations for battle. In addition, men made their own weapons: bow and arrow, shields, swords, lances, chucks, discus, etc. They knew what type of armor they were using. In modern times someone else makes the weapons and you know what can result.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Seriously? C'mon now. I'm female, but I'm smart and assertive and competent and I'm perfectly capable of fighting- and I would probably be better at violence than at rearing child. Also, what does honor or who makes what matter? Especially given how wrong your facts are- most weapons were made by specialists, as soon as people had a large enough volume of people have specialists- i.e., way before large-scale warfare.Also, WREAK. Mother Nature could WREAK havoc.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

I stand corrected in stating that some warriors did make their own weapons, and others like 'specialists' did indeed help to perfect and mass produce them. You have persuaded me that woman are just as brave and capable of fighting than men. Research Mother Kali in the Hindu scriptures and you'll see what I mean. That is what debate is all about to learn from others, and not to knock the opponent down to size. I see no honor in killing your own species; perhaps aliens, but not your own species.Why expedite death when it's inevitable for every species on Earth to die? Then again, ancient warriors never wanted to reach a ripe old age (invalid), but to die or live in battle with honor and reap the rewards of Heaven! You figure?Thanks for correcting me on 'WREAK' havoc.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

I really like you! This is a really graceful reply to a less-than-graceful argument!And animals don't really care about honor; that's not the point,. Chimps in particular are violent and have "warfare", in that males from groups actively seek out members of other groups to kill. I'm mostly just saying that ti's not that it has a precedent, not justifying. If anything, people should be able to use their intellect to avoid violence.As for ancient people, ancient life was DISGUSTING. Better to go in battle then to die a slow, painful death of starvation and disease at the ripe old age of thirty, especially if you're guaranteed eternal happiness in return.=)
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Scientific fact: the male (or Y) chromosome is diminishing. Therefore saying that women must continue to fulfill the same roles that they did 200 years ago is preposturous, as The genitical differences bettween the sexes is not great.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

I'm a spouse of a infantry wounded warrior. I no longer have a "husband" persay, but I do still have our two back to back (irish twin) girls... Try and picture the roles reversed in this kinds of situation.... yeah, easier said then done :?I would love to "throw" any women who "thinks" they are just as equal as a male when it comes to serving in a combat arms mos, out in a field for 7 straight days.As a female, we go through certain "monthly/physical" changes that a male will Never experience. So next time a "women" wants to be a bada$$ feminist and claim she's just as "qualified" to be a grunt, etc... please don't forget your tampons and clean "panties"... ;)sorry to offend any women, but being one myself, I would assume more women would also think about "hygiene" before "proving a point" ... :/
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Wow. So since you were a spouse, you understand what it takes to be in the field for 7 days? Let me, if I may just for you, clear it up a little bit with some facts. I am a recently retired soldier who served in the US Army. I was deployed to combat zones 3 times. I was "in a field" (btw, the correct way to say it is in THE field) for more than 7 days at a time. You learn to adapt, and you learn how to perform personal hygiene as best you can. I, as a woman, was not in a combat MOS, but you can trust me, I was in a combat zone so I was in the same convoys, roadside attacks, mortar attacks, etc. as my male counterparts. I am certified in field sanitation so I know how to make dirty water clean, I know where to put the dining facilities in relation to the toilet facilities, I know how to burn human feces as to not contaminate the area of operations. As far as tampons and clean panties, honey, you do what you gotta do in a war. You improvise how you must when you must. You learn to adapt. I attained the level of expert in both grenade and rifle qualification, I am a combat lifesaver, and an expert in the field of logistics (which is a support MOS, that has been thrust onto the front lines of Iraq and Afghanistan) so you do not offend me, your lack of understanding frightens me. It is people like you holding up little U.S. flags in the airports welcoming home our troops claiming to be supportive. Bottom line, I was in combat three times, so I should have the choice to be in a combat MOS.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

And some woman remind me of the types that try to run in heels from the bogeymen. ... :D.."I would love to "throw" any women who "thinks" - I dont think you could even throw yourself dear lady."As a female, we go through certain "monthly/physical" changes that a male will Never experience."----??duh  "So next time a "women" wants to be a bada$$ feminist and claim she's just as "qualified" to be a grunt, etc..." --- You sound like the classic "TrophyWife" :) I can see you and i are going to get along ;~On a more serious note :Your a spouse of a wounded infantry warrior. How very brave of you . It must be very hard for you at times. You sound like you need a break .Sympathies.......EDIT: 2.52PMNEXT DAY.........whoopsy..... I just did a bit of research. It seems , you say you dont want sympathy.....ok !BUT I CAN RELATE. No ive never been in the army but i have Post Traumatic Syndrome ,ETC . etc , etc ,etc and not to go on, a herniated disc is no fun either.No , i have never been in the army , SO WHAT .Neither has my daughter who spent 11 months fighting for her life!I wont reveal too much of what i know , but , InfantryWife...............Your not the only one . Do they force people to serve in the US army ? ?  No , you wont get anymore sympathy from me.Even though your husband may deserve his purple heart , your plight or whatever it is , is not deserving of a medal. Maybe you secretly desire to go awol.Those brave women who chose to assist the men in fighting wars do not join the bandwagon to try to prove that they are equal to men. Obviously your time as an infantry wife has been beyond lonely. Apparrently despite your husbands CHOICE to be in the army ,you have no female friends ,who were also in the army along with your husband ? I wonder why he never imformed you of how a lot of those women , who chose to bravely serve in war , are stronger than some of the toughest men he has ever met. These woman dont join to prove some stupid point that they are equal to man......What a naive and ungrateful bitch you are!Sad , as all this shows me (AFTER FURTHER RESEARCH I DID ON YOU)is that you are a naive trophy-wife , who is resentful for her choices. Maybe you need to grunt up a bit!.........................PS sorry , i prefer not to be a bitch...but sometimes..well...
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Just like Triffin these woman are to be admired .Not just for their beauty but for their bravery also.http://funlok.com/index.php/crazy-pics/beautiful-female-military-around-the-world-05012010.html
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

As a military wife, i am shocked at how little you know. I spent up to 8 days in the field as a 14 year old cadet, and yes a couple of times i was on my period. It may not make things easy, but you get around it. It seems you are the one who did not think about hygine, simply assuming a woman on her period is unhygienic. It is not about being a feminist. At school they taught us about the various trades, which we conducted exercises in. Before i was aware that women could not be infantry, that was what i wanted to be, because that was what i most enjoyed. Nothing feminist there. Just a woman wanting to do the career she wanted. Now, i am half way through RN selection to fly jets. Just because you are too pathetic to leave your mirror for more than a day, dosent mean the rest of us are.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

It's women like you I just don't get... I don't see how some families can brainwash their kids into becoming like you. You give women--and feminism--a bad name. Guess what? They have tampons in Iraq Gasp! They sell tampons in places other than the US and Europe? Double Gasp! Who'da thunk it?
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Women are physically and mentally weaker than men. However todays combat has significantly changed and war isn't as it used to be. You can let machines and tools make up for your lapses.So my conclusion is... not yet.. not until their weaknesses are completely able to be made up for.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Wow, that was probably one of the most ignorant statements ever made. Physically weaker, most of the time, yes we are. Mentally weaker, well your statement justifies my point. Your ignorance has weakened your argument. Go exercise that brain of yours!!! You can do it.I don't agree with women in combat, nor do I agree with men in combat. I believe war solves nothing. It only serves to strengthen our enemies negative view of us and their resolve to destroy us. It is a vicious cycle and will not be broken until humans perfect the art of diplomacy.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

First of all regarding mental weakness, picking out one single man does not account for the male gender in it's entirety and making fun of someone does not count as an argument. Also you seem to have no understanding about the mentality of the enemies modern American forces are fighting. They are brought up (or brainwashed) to believe a certain thing and they will stop at nothing to accomplish that end. They cannot be reasoned with. For the sake of other Innocent in the country they are rampaging through, they must be destroyed. As long as there are people who sill not listen to reason, wars will have to be fought until they are subdued. Pacifists will not bring peace. They will only stand on the fence and refuse to do anything.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Sigh... a hippy.You don't understand war which is why you don't believe in it. I have no problem with talking and personally believe violence should be the last option. But when the last option occurs and war happens... then you go for it 100%. You wouldn't understand, you think everything's done by talking. Probably in your protected little bubble.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

I don't mind being called a hippie. Thanks! Actually, the more precise word would be pacifist. Which is also fine by me because Jesus was a pacifist too. What is there to understand about war except people are greedy, ignorant, intolerant etc.? Those are the reasons wars get started. You live in the UK according to your stats, so you live in a "protected little bubble" too. The UK is just as protected as the US. Everything can be done by talking if the people talking are intelligent, compassionate and empathetic. I am not completely naive. Sometimes war happens whether I want it to or not. But it doesn't make it right.That isn't the issue to begin with, it's about women in combat. You are very sexist and ignorant, either you are a misinformed child or you are a very lonely single man with that kind of opinion of women.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Thankyou you so much finally someone agrees with me!!! His views are just so wrong
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

You are very welcome. His views are very twisted, indeed. It's actually kind of creepy. I pity the woman who makes the mistake of dating or marrying him. She will be very unhappy and probably abused.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Not really sexist. I've just got old fashioned views in general. Your understanding of equality is different. You're with all this new-age hippy pussified world bullcrap that doesn't actually work in real life.. or life outside of your bubble anyway. What is there to understand about war except people are greedy, ignorant, intolerant etc.?Everything can be done by talking if the people talking are intelligent, compassionate and empathetic.You don't really understood what I said though did you? Not everything can be solved by talks. World doesn't work in a way where people just agree over matters so as not to lead to war. If somebody doesn't get what they want they will go to war to get it. Most of the times it is wrong. Most of the times it is also unavoidable. Sometimes however war is justified.You live in the UK according to your stats, so you live in a "protected little bubble" too. The UK is just as protected as the US.Wow you're smart. Everybody in the UK ans US is well off and enjoy happy lives with nothing wrong happening to them. Lol. I'm ignorant aswell haha!!You are very sexist and ignorantYou say that but I know lots of women who agree with my views. I respect, care for and love women.. so call me sexist if you want but anybody that knows me knows I'm not.Ohh and let's go with your stupid reply to that actually...I don't mind being called very sexist and ignorant. Thanks! Actually, the more precise word would be a man. Which is also fine by me because Gandhi was a man too and I share his views about women and lots of other things in general.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Thank you for agreeing with me. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. Congratulations, now that you've admitted you are sexist maybe you can get some help for it. The women who agree with you need to be deprogrammed, sounds as if they've been brain washed or they're too frightened to disagree.By the way, I never said EVERYBODY in the UK and the US are well off and enjoy happy lives with nothing wrong happening to them. I just said they are protected as in...they don't have to witness events like what happens in Iraq, Afghanistan or Sudan on a daily basis right outside their front doors. That's what I mean by protected. I am far from well off but I do okay for my family. I support a family of 6 and I am damn proud of that! It is not easy and we have to make sacrifices but we get by.As far as you really caring, respecting and loving women...well, that's a matter of opinion now, isn't it?
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Wow.. somebody doesn't know when they're getting the piss taken out of them.You live in the UK according to your stats, so you live in a "protected little bubble" too. The UK is just as protected as the US.Hmm... sounds like you're saying because I live in UK I live in a protected little bubble. I just said they are protected as in...they don't have to witness events like what happens in Iraq, Afghanistan or Sudan on a daily basis right outside their front doors. That's what I mean by protected. I am far from well off but I do okay for my family. I support a family of 6 and I am damn proud of that! It is not easy and we have to make sacrifices but we get by.A - Not protected is different than war-tornB - Everybody in the world apart from Iraqis Afghans or Sudanese are protected according to youC - You need to keep your legs closed. Don't want to spawn any more of your breed.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

BullSHIT. You're a bigot, love, and I would quit before I got too far ahead if I were you. Physically smaller, yes, but women usually have better endurance and work more effectively in groups- which is a huge strength. Also, women are just intelligent as men. Yes, there are some stupid women, just like there are stupid men (hey, look at how awful your grammar is!). By any measure, I'm more intelligent than most men- by class rank, SAT score, IQ test, you name it. Have a nice day, Boy Who Will Never Get Laid.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

:D:D Women....Must be that time of the month ehh??I'm sorry I really can't take this seriously.. I haven't stopped laughing since women started writing all this bollocks about sexism/bigotism etc. As soooon as you say women are not as smart as men.. its like there's a whole army of feminists waiting to kill you. Haha!!
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: YES

........First of all, this SHOULD be taken seriously. Women have been oppressed throughout history and are still oppressed today! Women are raped, abused, treated like trash in many parts of the world. There are women in some parts of the world that aren't even allowed to drive. They need to wait for their sons and husbands to come home and drive them to their friends' house or the local grocery store. Step outside your little bubble and realize that this is an extremely serious issue that NEEDS to be talked about. You realize that your view of women being less intelligent than men is wrong... and instead of admitting your wrong, you laugh and act as if this isn't a big issue and it's simply a small group of women overreacting. The reason why have been looked down upon in history is because of the view of ignorant, stupid little men like YOU. You fail to acknowledge the intelligence of women because of your idiotic and shameless ignorance (I used the word shameless because you fail to realize that you are wrong). You blame their words for experiencing PMS, when in actuality, you have just insulted an entire gender, an entire sex. THAT is enough justification for women (AND MEN) to dispute your stupid claims speak up for for themselves. You idiot.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

soo maybe men are a little stronger than woman but who decides who is more mentally fit. woman can be just as strong as men mentally and we can come very close physically. Woman make many crucial decisions today that decide our countries future and we almost had a female president so i dont know how you can say woman arent mentally the same. so woman are certanly weaker than others but those are the ones who arent made for the army and can't handle situations like that. Men also have trouble handling situations that are mentally tough. look at the rate of post tramatic stress syndrome from returning soldiers. we are very similar
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

I knew this would happen. When it comes to the mind people always say men and women are equal. I'm not going to go into that debate.. but when it comes to combat or fighting.. then I will say that it's the same mentally and physically..men are superior. Women do not even come close. You can say what you want about women making crucial decisions... and you didn't almost have a female president.. and we did have a female prime minister - not good at all. PTS is due to the pussyfying of men in general.. and I would also say the term is used a bit too often. However I'm not an expert.. but all this psychology bullshit these days is literally bullshit. Men and women are not similar.. each have their roles in society. That's getting f*cked up now and women want to take on men's roles... society is going down the drain. Not to disrepute women or anything.. they have the most important job in the world of raising children etc... but they don't seem to think that's enough.. sigh....
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

You are one seriously disturbed person. Men's roles and women's roles, what? Our society has, historically, been patriarchal. That's why our society is so messed up! Men also do wonderful jobs raising children and not ALL women make good mothers. I know some, personally, who are rotten mothers! Gender should not be a factor when determining your role in society. Why are you so terrified by that? Your arguments really sound as if they are coming from a frightened little boy. Don't worry honey, the vagina won't hurt you. She's here to help.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

I agree with you Shelly, I was once scared of the Vagina,but thenI SEEN THE LIGHT! and i knew that the Vagina was here to help!
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Clever Mikey...........................................................................................Smart man.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

That's why our society is so messed up!Ehhh no, society is getting more messed up the less patriarchal it becomes.. You tell me whether society has got better or worse over the last 50 years. You probably wouldn't know cause the worst thing that happened to you was your parents didn't get you a $50,000 car for your 13th birthday.