azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

It didn't lead you to a debate though. I guess you love being wrong.You told me that everything I had said was with the intentions of me getting into a debate.It didn't lead you to a debate, so I guess you love being wrong.Except, you revealed that it was all thoughts in your head that you didn't type out.I did type it all out.If you read it carefully, my annotations were just dictionary descriptions of the statements that I had already made.I wasn't really just describing the statements, I was describing what the words meant when put together.You said that you clearly said something that you admit that you didn't clearly say. I did clearly say it.You just didn't understand what the words meant when put together, so I had to describe the meaning behind the words.You don't know what the word clearly means.Which one?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

f you read it carefully, my annotations were just dictionary descriptions of the statements that I had already made.You lying sack of shit. "I just want you to answer the question" does not translate to "I want to stay a conversation" using the dictionary. Fuck off.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

You lying sack of shit. "I just want you to answer the question" does not translate to "I want to stay a conversation" using the dictionary. Fuck off.If I just want you to answer the question doesn't rule out that I want it to remain a discussion.Context, remember.The context means the reason behind why I wanted you to answer the question.The reason I wanted you to answer the question was because I wanted to maintain the conversation.The evidence that I wanted you to maintain the conversation is proof of my previous character. Albeit a positive one.If someone asks me to pass them bread or something, shall I scrumple the bread up then pass it to them, since they never said why they wanted to bread?(according to your logic)Anyway, I never said that I didn't want to debate,I just said that I wasn't arguing.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Speaking clearly means that you aren't relying on context. If someone asked you for bread, is that them clearly asking to make a sandwich? You did say you didn't want to debate when you completely failed to debate with the person who was willing to discuss the topic.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Speaking clearly means that you aren't relying on context.It means that the context is already known without having to state it.If someone asked you for bread, is that them clearly asking to make a sandwich?If you ask someone for bread, you are telling them all that they need to know.Whether or not they know you are making a sandwich and what you want the bread for is down to context.The context being known in this case is about what the other person wants the bread for.In this case, when I was asking you a question, the context was so I was able to debate.That is all you needed to know.Passing me the bread of answers to my questions.You didn't need to know what sort of sandwich that I was going to make out of your answers, all that I needed was the bread, your answers.You knew my reasons.You did say you didn't want to debate when you completely failed to debate with the person who was willing to discuss the topic.It wasn't me who had fallen short of meeting the requirements for a debate, it was you.The fact that you said that I had failed means that you believe that I at leas tried to debate.If I had tried to debate, it means I had given an indication of wanting to debate.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I won. You couldn't answer the simple question with a yes because you know that it is ridiculous to claim that the person clearly stated they wanted a sandwich.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

I won. You couldn't answer the simple question with a yes because you know that it is ridiculous to claim that the person clearly stated they wanted a sandwich.No, you are just giving me more reason to believe you're dumb.The person passing the bread doesn't need to know that they are making a sandwich.Whether the person clearly stated it within context or not depends upon the reason behind it.It doesn't matter whether the person clearly stated they had wanted the bread.(So don't try to create false arguments that don't exist)All that you needed to know was that I needed my question answering in order to debate, you didn't need to know why.You knew clearly that I wanted to debate because my remarks that I had made to you in the past would have indicated why I wanted you to answer my questions.Context = motive.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

You knew clearly that I wanted to debate because my remarks that I had made to you in the past would have indicated why I wanted you to answer my questions.False, I have never seen you debate.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

False, I have never seen you debate.We are debating.Just not what we should be debating about.Not my fault.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

In any debate I have seen you in you are always off topic. You are always the one who takes it off topic. It is your fault.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

In any debate I have seen you in you are always off topic. You are always the one who takes it off topic. It is your fault.You don't get it do you?Which debates?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Every single fucking debate you have ever "participated" in.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Every single fucking debate you have ever "participated" in.e.g.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Look up.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Look up."Every debate" is not an example."Every" is generic.An example is not generic.I had asked for an example.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Don't tell me what to do.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Don't tell me what to do.So says the most grouchy person on the site.I'll tell you to do what you in fact tell me to do.I do what I is asked of me, so should you.You refuse, so I therefore have to end up telling you.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

And, I tell you exactly what you tell me, and you think I am grumpy. So, the real question is, why do you think that people who sound like you are grumpy?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

And, I tell you exactly what you tell me, and you think I am grumpy. So, the real question is, why do you think that people who sound like you are grumpy?Your statement would only be correct if you did say the same things as me.I invent stuff.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I invent stuff.Well, we are in agreement there.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Well, we are in agreement there.It's a good thing that I invent stuff.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

You aren't exactly Edison.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

You aren't exactly Edison.Quite right.Not yet, anyway.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Failing to do something does not mean you tried you stupid fuck. You can easily fail to do things you don't try to do.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Failing to do something does not mean you tried you stupid fuck. You can easily fail to do things you don't try to do.You can only fail if you don't try only if a target is set for that person by another.You had not stated any specific targets for me, so you contradict yourself.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

So, you now admit that it is possible to fail at something you didn't try. That my friend really is a contradiction.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

So, you now admit that it is possible to fail at something you didn't try. That my friend really is a contradiction.It is possible to fail at something you didn't try only in one circumstance.(the one that I had just mentioned.)That circumstance didn't apply, so I might as well have stated that it is impossible, not possible.Just like with a tall building.Let's say that you were an ordinary civilian.It would be correct to say that it is impossible of being 100m above the Al Dubai building. Context.We could say that since we have a jet plane, it would be possible to be 100m above a building, but that wouldn't fit within context.An ordinary citizen doesn't have a jet plane.You love pedantry.This whole argument about context should depend on the context that my previous behaviour has shown.Can you point out any instances about how my behaviour has been wrong?Because you sure haven't.Don't deflect.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Because you sure haven't.You just responded to a post pointing out how you contradicted yourself. You lose.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

You just responded to a post pointing out how you contradicted yourself. You lose.It's a shame that I have to repeat myself.It is possible to fail at something you didn't try only in one circumstance.(the one that I had just mentioned.)That circumstance didn't apply, so I might as well have stated that it is impossible, not possible.Just like with a tall building.Let's say that you were an ordinary civilian.It would be correct to say that it is impossible of being 100m above the Al Dubai building. Context.We could say that since we have a jet plane, it would be possible to be 100m above a building, but that wouldn't fit within context.An ordinary citizen doesn't have a jet plane.You love pedantry.Don't deflect
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I am not reading your stupid fucking post. You said one thing, got called on it, changed your tune. Admit you lost or shut the fuck up.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

I am not reading your stupid fucking post. You said one thing, got called on it, changed your tune. Admit you lost or shut the fuck up.No, I won't shut the fuck up.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I keep hearing Atheists and those on the Left on this site telling me how there are pro life Atheists(the contention being you can be a moral person without faith in God). I would like to hear from you if you are there.Now before you waste all our time claiming to be pro life when in fact you support even late term abortions on demand when you vote for Democrats, DON'T! If you vote for politicians who support late term abortions on demand for any reason at any stage(which is what the Democrat party supports), then don't waste my time. You are not truly pro life, you would be a phony.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Whenever I speak to the support from the Democrat party, Green party, and other Liberal parties, for issues such as late term abortions on demand for any reason at any stage, EVEN AFTER THE BABY IS BORN ALIVE FROM A BOTCHED ABORTION, there are people on this site & on the Left who deny supporting these things with their vote.Now ask yourself why they refuse to admit what they truly support with their vote. The answer is very simple. To say you support subsidising the selling of baby organs after killing the baby, or allowing a baby born alive to die, or to kill babies whose IQ's might not be as high as other's(special olympic children, etc.), or simply aborting late term Babies for any reason at any stage, is admitting you have the humanity of an animal. This goes against the Left's narrative of being the compassionte ones. In order to deceive people, you can not admit your inhumanity when you support these types of things. They can not be honest with you because if they are, the true lack of compassion shows through.It is so obvious to any honest person who does not fear admitting what he supports. If I voted for a politician who supported allowing a Baby born alive from a botched late term abortion to die, I WOULD BE SUPPORTING THAT SAME THING!(177 out of 182 Democrats supports this inhumanty) It can be no more clear than that.If I voted for a member of the KKK, I would be an accomplice to any racist bills being signed.My conscience is clear when I vote for Conservatives. They support nothing at odds with humanity. Life is simple when you can be honest with what you support.What does it say about a person who says he is not a one issue voter even when that one issue is allowing a Baby born alive to die, or allowing all late term abotions for any reason at any stage. Where are your priorities? Would you accept that excuse if a Conservative voted for a KKK member? Would you excuse his argument of not being a one issue voter? Nah, you would crucify him as well you should.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Until you recognize that the underlying issue is disagreement on what constitutes a human life, you will simply do your argument and those who agree with it a disservice.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Pro choice. With stipulations. Such as: no abortions after the 2nd Trimester.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Fair enough, why are you prochoice? .
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Complete phony! When you vote for Democrats you are supporting 3rd trimester abortions. Who do you think you are kidding?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

People who scream about their "rights" the loudest only care about THEIR rights. Others have "rights" too. If you believe in GOD, let GOD handle it!! What gives you the "right" to judge others? I'm not for abortion without reason, but I AM for the RIGHT to do what you think best for your family, the embryo and YOU! IF you know that the living being will be deformed, diseased, , a non-functional being to suffer through a likely un-enjoyable life. Or if it will take away from your existing family ITS right to a normal life, (ie. throw you into poverty with medical bills or deeper into poverty so your family can't pull itself out, then that your right! OR to save the life of the mother for the rest of an established family! Let GOD handle it! NOT some self appointed "gods" doing "GODS" work!The RIGHT of the persons involved, to make that CHOICE has to be considered, after all, if you believe it is a "sin", let THEM stand in judgement. So many that say they "believe", have no confidence in "GODS" judgement .... they have to vent their own!
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Liberal prolifers are not like that. I am a liberal prolifer, and I care about every living creature from conception to death. I support welfare, contraception, adoption reform, fair work laws, and sex ed with consent and contraceptive counseling.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

It would have ben more accurate to begin your statement with the word "Some". I actually agree with you, mostly. I've had an experience with making a choice between saving my first wife's live and the birth of an unknown entity. That may sound cold to some but until you have to make the "choice", you look at things differently. I (we), had two children that needed a mother (7 & 9). It wasn't that I didn't care for the embryo, I cared MORE for the ones I had had for years. When you HAVE to make achoice, I doubt you would have made it differently. It wasn't that we didn't "care". My wife died 2 years later. At least the kids had her for that long. I agree with the rest of your comments.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I am sorry about your wife. I respect you for caring. .
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

The only reason on why I disagree with that is for the reason of, every time there is something "we"(Christians) do not support, you always say, "Let God handle it" that's it not always the case. "Cry aloud; do not hold back; lift up your voice like a trumpet; declare to my people their transgression, to the house of Jacob their sins."-Isaiah 58:1I feel it is our duty to stand up for what we know is wrong. The unborn possesses personal attributes such as sin and joy. In Psalm 51:5, David says, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.” In Luke 1:44, “For behold, when the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby leaped in my womb for joy.”There are people who are on waiting lists to be able to adopt a child allow them to adopt yours if you want to stop is heart. And also, there are many I know of who have autism, and other birth defects. They do have a chance of a good life, not all of them have a bad one. They need proper care.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Every living person should get to choose the fate of their own body. Pregnant women should get to choose whether they have their baby or not. They may be consulted by the father or other person but ultimately it's their body and their choice.If there are ramifications of having the abortion - such as if indeed there is a divine power that is going to judge the woman harshly for doing it - then that's between that woman and that divine power. Its not your job to impose your religious belief upon all of society, and indeed in a society with religious freedom to do so is to violate their self determination.In terms of whether the fetus magically becomes alive at a particular week of pregnancy I think that's a ludicrous pro-choice argument. A living thing is growing inside you. If you force it out and it dies then yes you killed it. But is that murder? No. Because society has a long list of types of killing it does not consider murder and abortion currently at least in the USA is one of them. Wars, law enforcement, self defense, euthanasia, suicide, high risk surgeries, etc, are all in various societies considered acceptable. And indeed death is a huge part of all of our lives everyday whether it's in terms of the food we eat or the foibles in life that bring us death. Aborting an unwanted baby is just one more death among many.The only other question is whether the baby in the womb has constitutional rights which it can't yet speak out to protect on its own. That's hogwash. The founding fathers who wrote up the framework of US rights included at the time slaveholders, and denied women equal power with men and didn't let them vote. It's absured that white men who overlooked Blacks and women still would have had babies in the womb in mind when they wrote our protections. Furthermore there are countless lost pregnancies outside of abortion due to genetically failed babies which can't reach term. Theoretically if every baby in the womb has the right to live then when babies genetically failing start to go the mother and society would be obligated to surgery and the most expensive and extreme of interventions to try to save that life or else be complicit in allowing its death. Finally let me add I personally would not choose to abort, and my wife and I have two kids whom we never for a second considered aborting. But that's our choice. And specifically that's my wife's choice. And we don't get to decide that for every other pregnant woman out there. Everyone should get to decide about their own bodies. If a baby is indeed born then as soon as it is outside then yes it too has rights. But if still hosted by mom then it's mom's call.Finally I'll add that in a largely male dominated society rife with sexism and rape it is this option of terminating pregnancies which has given women at least a partial footing for self determination in the path of their lives. If you want to take that away then you better try dang hard to make all other aspects of life equal and fair because withput doing that you're just setting women back half a century.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Every living person should get to choose? What about the baby's choice?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

The baby is a guest of the mother's body until it is no longer inside. And the baby is incapable of expressing a choice, which means per your standard then even a baby genetically destined to fail would have automatic rights which would force the mother and society to go to great extremes to try to save that which cannot be saved. Far more pregnancies end by natural means than by abortions. How would a naturally failing baby have any fewer rights than one that wasn't?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

If you don't want a baby, use contraception. It is wrong to kill babies.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

What about married couples who are using contraception but are in the 2% where it fails? What if they already had a large family, or can't even afford what they have already, or have a brutal genetic condition the kid would get, or just lost their jobs, or have to start cancer treatments now or die? Or got raped? Or truly want to raise a family but their current pregnancy is mid failing biologically and getting a DNC now speeds up when they can try again? Think that doesn't matter? Many older couples struggle to successfully have a child naturally themselves and telling them their fetus which is going to fail or be stillborn has to ride to the end may prohibit that older couple from their small time window of waining fertility.Prolifers usually assume the people wanting abortions are single and slutty. There is a wide array of valid reasons married couples or people trying to do the responsible thing with contraception end up needing abortions. It's not so simple as keep your pants on. Couples married for decades shouldn't be told to just never have sex with each other again. People who used a condom shouldn't receive your disdain.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

That is not an excuse for murder. Use multiple forms of contraception or get your tubes removed.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Have you a) remained a virgin, or b) resorted to multiple forms of contraception simultaneously, or c) had surgery to make pregnancy from sex with you an impossibility?
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

I do plan on having my tubes removed or tied as soon as possible. Until I am sterilized, I will not have sex,
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

That's your choice. You make your choice. Others will make theirs.I don't really believe you anyway.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Fact: I will wait until I have my tubes removed to have sex, and abortion is not a valid choice. I don't care if you believe me, because I don't answer to you, I answer to myself.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

I am against the taking of life. So I try not to. Though it depends on what you define as 'life', We give our own definitions when determining what is life and what is not - that is the main dispute I guess. I do not kill humans or animals or eat them either, as I see them as living beings. I guess you can say I am also pro-life to that extent. But when it comes to freewill and the circumstances of a family's / female's choices - It is not up to me to determine their will, as the consequences will only affect theirs, not mine. Leave it for them to decide, and if you do believe in God and see it as a sin, then let God do the judging, not you, and practice instead: "thou shalt not judge thy neighbor".
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prochoice.

Pro choice - the government shouldn't have any say in such a delicate matter. The choice to have an abortion is an extremely difficult one and to just have a sweeping position saying that it cannot be done is not the correct way to approach.
Debate: Are you prolife or prochoice?
Side: Prolife.

Pro choice - the government shouldn't have any say in such a delicate matter. The choice to have an abortion is an extremely difficult one and to just have a sweeping position saying that it cannot be done is not the correct way to approachDo you have any evidence that suggests that a fetus is not alive at conception?