azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

a bad person is a bad leader. he may have put the country out of ruins but that doesnt mean he was a good leader. because a good leader isnt about only riches. a good leader has to have morals, and CLEARLY he didnt have good morals. therefore he wasnt a good leader. i dont care if he got them rich, money doesnt buy happiness. neither does murdering. and guess what? you think im stupid shit, yet your arguing with a 14 year old! feel stupid yet that she is winning you?
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

His morals made sense and were good within a certain world view, fascism may have as its philosophical base an inaccurate central driving force of world affairs but if one fails to see this inaccuracy most of hitlers actions become admirable, even wise. If your read "The Prince", you will find arguments about what a good leader is and it will likely be different than what you seem like you would expect in a good leader. A good leader must know how to turn the devil into god and god into the devil, to be good while being evil and evil well good, I would say hitler was good at that.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

i dont think you guys understand. he MURDERED 6 MILLION PEOPLE!!!! No person that can do that is a good leader. its not about the money, dont you see!!! if murder for no reason other than prejudices doesnt matter than i dont know what this world has come to
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

I understand perfectly, I'm just trying to make an interesting debate by supporting the side most people would disagree with. If you weren't so immature and actually listened to what I had say, accepted both sides of the argument, and stopped being so biased then I wouldn't have called you things like 'dumbfuck'. As I said previously, I acknowledge the fact that he was a murderer, but to say he had no good in him at all is complete ignorance.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

so why are you even debating me? to get a kick out of it? someone like hitler is EVIL. he was mental. he might have had some good in him UNTIL he became a leader. He destroyed his countries reputation forever
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

so why are you even debating me? to get a kick out of it?As I said before, to explore different world views.  someone like hitler is EVILNobody can be evil, because it is subject to opinion.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

people can be evil, go ask osama... oh wait hes dead, after being killed when he was hidden- we seeked him out after he knocked over the twin towers with over 1000 people in it! That is another example of evilness
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

As long as there is one person alive that liked someone then nobody can be truly evil. People worshiped Osama as a God; so I would hardly call that evil. And I'll tell you what, I might reconsider my position if you can give me any evidence that Osama actually blew up the towers. But guess what? You can't; because there is none. America needed an excuse to invade so they 'got' one, now I'm not saying Osama is good; he was a prick, but there is no proof suggesting he blew up those towers, quite the opposite actually. Also America ILLEGALLY invaded another country to kill Osama, and along with Osama they killed a lot of innocent bystanders, not only was this disgusting enough, they had no right to kill Osama in the first place. Osama should have been taken to trial; not killed, which is yet another illegal act from the 'great' country of America.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

you want proof? go to the graveyard, look at my dads tombstone, that should be enough proof! osama killed lots of innocent bystanders, you wanna TRY to give me that shit??? osama deserved it.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

look at my dads tombstone, that should be enough proof!Last time I checked a tombstone isn't adequate proof. I could have them write "killed by a giant leprechaun" on my tombstone when I die, but it doesn't make it so. Your blatant ignorance brought on by endless amounts of ridiculous propaganda from the American government is obvious, perhaps you should do some research into subjects before you start talking shit about things you clearly know nothing about. You have still failed to provide any real proof to back up your claim that Osama was behind 9/11, and have resulted to making claims that cannot be backed up. Guess what? You lost mate.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

By your assessment a good number of american presidents are not good leaders, the same with most leaders though out all of human history. Death and killing is a natural part of being a leader.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

i agree with you, a number of american presidents are not good leaders! however, there is a difference in killing for war purposes and killing for no reason other than differences in religion or beliefs or race!
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

What exactly would that difference be ?
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

"dumbshit"... "your so stupid"... "your so racist!"... "your so stubborn you HAVE to be right,"... "if your too stupid"... "u asshole!!!"...Reading your dispute, this is all I can see, you know you've lost.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

idk how blind you are, did yopu not just see supremepizza call me dumb fuck, stupid, biased,and other things? we both disputed like that. so start looking harder if that is all you can see
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

I don't know what you are talking about, your post was petulant because you lost the argument. If you go back over it as I've just done, you'll find yourself to be the aggressor. So please don't tell me how to read, thanks.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

what i am saying is that while i might have been aggressive, supremepizza was just as much! i am telling you to read because while you might have read my posts you definitely didnt read his time where he was petulantthanks
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

"he created a world war!""Incorrect; those that opposed him created it. On country cannot create a world war, many countries do. And he had good reasons for helping to start one" The reason the war was started was because Germany, under Hitler's rule, violated the treaty signed after WWI, stating that Germany could not have its own armed forces, by creating an army.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

He was a very good person he would never drink wine or he even didn't smoke so much.He loved kids and was a very good person.He though captured many place but actually he took the revenge of world war one
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

To all the countless people mentioning the holocuastAmerica Remember those indians you butcherd and kicked out of your country???Spain Remember those Aztecs and Indiginous mexican South american people you killed for gold and land?Israel remember Palestine???Uk Remember killing those indians and africans for land??Belgium Remember how you treated the people of the CongoPoland Remember how you invaded every country bordering you for land after becoming independent (lithuania Czech Republic Russia) and how you treated your ukrainian majority in south eastern poland as bad as the germans treated jewsChina Do i even have to say anything hereFrance Remember how you killed millions of africans and asians for colonies and is disrespectfull to foreigners todayEVERY COUNTRY HAS DONE A TON OF BAD THINGS IN HISTORY IN STEAD OF DEMONIZING HITLER DEMONIZE EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO HAS KILLED ANOTHER PERSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CAESER IM LOOKING AT YOU!!
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

After WW1 Germany was bankrupt and without friends in Europe. There was no feasible way to lower unemployment and inflation and get the economy back on track. There was no one to trade with.On his rise to power Adolf Hitler used expansion to re employ the German People. The building of Autobahns and new architecture, huge stadiums and places for huge political rallies were built. These employed huge amounts of people. Then there was rearming and again millions more were employed. The economy was back on track and looking good.If the average German family saved just 5 marks a week, they could own a brand new VolksWagon, that's how good it was.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

I love how the Jew, or at least the person with the star of David, supports him.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Personally, i feel Hitler was not a very bad kinda guy....... We all know that the Germans had suffered a setback in the first world war. If it was not for Hitler, the nation would have sunk into the depths of economic crisis. It was Hitler who brought the economy of the nation back on its legs.........And to think of it, he had developed the nation so much that he went into another war within a very short time............. If it was not for the war Germany would have risen to greater heights but that does'nt matter as it was only the good things that appeared big for me............
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

He could have been a great leader if he didn't execute many Jews....
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

It wasn't just the Jews it was disabled people, Slavic peoples, gypsies, gays, Jehovah's witnesses, black people, people of different political views and beliefs. He also unfairly treated women. 5 million people died in the holocaust who were not Jewish.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

You cannot consider the fact that yes, he killed over six million Jews, but the fact that he changed Germany in so many different ways is what makes him good. He increased the production of many products and also changed much of the architecture. I have so much respect for this man due to the fact that he could change things so easily and make an enormous and beneficial result. Yes, he created a massive war but the choice was all in those that chose to favor Hitler. If enough people rejected Hitler's dictatorship then he would have more than likely been removed or attacked. So before you go on speaking of him killing six million Jews, thinking of all the positive changes before hand and ignore the genocide.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

You cannot consider the fact that yes, he killed over six million JewsExcuse me but:Increasing the production of weapons, nearly producing the atomic bomb, building temples to the glory of the third reich cannot be described by a reasoned mind, as offsetting one of the worst genocides in history. This is not even mentioning the destruction of many great cities in Europe. Decades of humiliation for the German people, the prevention of their leadership role Europe for decades to come. The exodus if its greatest minds. Come On!The best thing that ever happened to Germany's future was loosing the war.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Despite it being the worst genocides in history, Hitler changed decades all over the world. He helped people quit smoking because he was concerned with their health. In 1940, the annual cigarette consumption in Germany was 749 while America smoked over 3,000. The Autobahn? Yup. Hitler encourage for a larger network of roads to be built across Germany. This established the FIRST freeway system in the world. This eventually spread through out continents and forever changed the way humans travel. Also, the building of the Autobahn provided over 100,000 workers with jobs necessary for economic efforts. Did I mention Hitler wanted to bring UNITY through road way systems.The man who helped America send a man to the moon? Wernher Von Braun? He was a member of the Nazi party and was a Schutzstaffel officer. He developed the Saturn V booster rocket. That was the one carrying man to the moon in the summer of 1969. This former Nazi opened the gate to space travel. HE WAS A NAZI. Just like Hitler. Hitler helped people realize their full potentials. He was a great guy.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

beacuse there was nothing he could do besides kill the jues and get a better army besides he did his job my helping the germans
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Hitler was a good person because he save Germany from starvation. Germany was in a depressor and with money being worthless he saved them by giving them food from France which was taken over.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

WOW. The rhetoric over him! Anyway- he was correct about Christianity!! And all 3 Abrahamic religions. He was correct about EVOLUTION of MAN!! Without him, we continue to meander along I. Evolutionary PAUSE.Because he LOST- I say he’s BAD
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Hitler is a hero to many Germans at that time. He transformed Germany from a weakened and depressed nation after World War One into a solid and respected country.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

Hitler was born a Christian, and he took money from the Catholic church which supported the Nazi party- as did America. He was wrong for killing so many innocent people, but I'm afraid he was right about Christianity.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

Yes he was correct. If he had simply killed the Bible then he would not have needed kill a single jew
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

I agree for what you have said. You are right! This is true because it has actual conversation of what Hitler has said.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

That's not even an argument? That is just copying and pasting something from another website we all agree upon anyway. Also Hitler was a Catholic, just to let you know ;)...and no I'm not lieing.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

Well, since most people are judged based on how they end their career, and or life, I have to say bad. In fact, he was really, really bad. But, I have to wonder if he was also suffering from a series of horrible things that occured to him over the course of his life. He may have started out life like all of us...somewhat innocent. But alas, his end was bad...so, BAD IT IS!
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

There is now ample evidence Hitler was quite insane I believe. That does not excuse the actions though. You cannot abide by the acts of one who causes that much grief in such a short span regardless of mental capacity.Despite doctrine to the contrary history rightly judges one by what is done, not by what is believed by the individual commiting the act.No doubt in his mind he was some sort of hero, likley even demigod by his insanity. But he was a disease.That said, every German neighbor who saw a Jewish neighbor shipped to hell knew where at the time failed a basic test of humanity.It's what happens when people abandon their mind for the comfort of some belief, regardless of the belief.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

Great leader; I will give him that. But no matter how you chalk it up, he ordered the mass murder of millions of innocent people. That cannot be considered good and is unforgivable.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Proof? Although the Nazi Party did kill many, many people it never directly came from Hitler. Also, in his eyes, they were not innocent. I am merely being the Devil's Advocate here, but imagine it like this: it is like with Americans, most believe terrorists are bad and would see it as a good thing getting rid of them all. You have to put it into perspective on where the person comes from and whether or not it is their fault directly. Personally I believe a sin is a sin, but it could quite easily be argued it was a result of the anti-Semite atmosphere in Europe and most of the world at that period of time.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

he's clearly a wicked person.... he killed a lot of innocent people, and without any logical reasons. he killed 'em just coz he hated 'em. he didn't even do any good both to the Jews and the Germans
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

he killed a lot of innocent people, and without any logical reasons. he killed 'em just coz he hated 'em.Haven't done your research, aye? There is a bit more to do with it than just 'hating' them. Also at that time everyone hated Jews, homos, blacks, ect... so it was quite hypocritical of the Americans especially to be calling the Nazis 'evil'.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

uh...Americans weren't the one's mass murdering innocents...nor was anyone else besides the German Nazi Party...The rest of the world may not have "liked" Jews, blacks, homosexuals, etc., but at least they weren't putting them in giant furnaces.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Americans weren't the one's mass murdering innocents...nor was anyone else besides the German Nazi Party...WOW...are you that ignorant? Okay let me give you a list of what the 'good' countries did:AMERICA: During the Second World War, the Allied aerial forces performed air raids on civilian populations in Europe and over Japan. These actions were retrospectively called crimes by some historians,[4] and were also viewed as such by the leaders of the Axis Powers during the war (Linked with the Bombing of Dresden)BRITAIN During the first years of British rule in Iraq, numerous attacks on civilians were carried out, including village burning and indiscriminate bombing. (The Iraqi revolt)CANADA C.P. Stacey, the Canadian official campaign historian, reports that on 14 April 1945 rumours had been spread that the popular commanding officer of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada had been killed by a civilian sniper; this resulted in the Highlanders setting fire to civilian property within the town of Friesoythe in a case of reprisal. Stacey later wrote that the Canadian troops first removed German civilians from their property before setting the houses on fire, he commented that he was "glad to say that [he] never heard of another such case". It was later found that German soldiers had in fact killed the Argyll's commander, Lieutenant Colonel Stewart.FRANCE Following the Operation Dragoon landings in southern France and the collapse of the German military occupation in August 1944, large numbers of Germans could not escape from France and surrendered to the French Forces of the Interior. The Resistance killed few of their Wehrmacht prisoners, but most of their Gestapo or SS prisoners did not survive.AUSTRALIA According to Mark Johnston, "the killing of unarmed Japanese was common" and Australian command tried to put pressure on troops to actually take prisoners, but the troops proved reluctant. When prisoners were indeed taken "it often proved difficult to prevent them from killing captured Japanese before they could be interrogated".[58] According to Charles Lindbergh, the Australians often threw prisoners out from aircraft, then claimed they had committed suicide. According to Johnston, as a consequence of this type of behavior; "Some Japanese soldiers were almost certainly deterred from surrendering to Australians". Major General Paul Cullen indicated that the killing of Japanese prisoners in the Kokoda Track Campaign was not uncommon. In one instance he recalled during the battle at Gorari that "the leading platoon captured five or seven Japanese and moved on to the next battle. The next platoon came along and bayoneted these Japanese." He also stated that he found the killings understandable but that it had left him feeling guilty.And yes, I'm Australian so I'm not being biased at all. How about the next time you make a claim like that ("Americans weren't the one's mass murdering innocents...nor was anyone else besides the German Nazi Party...") you can back it up.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Also America kind of killed millions of indians in their 200 years of existance no big deal or anything
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Sorry for the double post, don't know why that happened
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Remember those people who were on North America before the whites came..........Oh and where did they go?? Oh what?? They were killed by the americans and forced to live in "reservations"
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

All religious,political, and national undertones aside... I believe he was bad for the world. Between his murdering, his hate mongering, his stealing, his blatant disrespect for human life, and the disrespect he had for his own family... I'm not quite sure why I dislike him. Yes. He economically helped germany. However, he was a tactical mess waiting to happen. Honestly, no rational commander would send his under supplied troops to attack Russia in the winter. Under supplied because you can't out flank Russia... Its HUGE. They over stretched their supply lines... but I digress. Ultimately, he did more harm than good. By a LARGE amount.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

Thankyou for being one of the few that actually made a valid argument that recognized both sides of the argument whilst still choosing you own :)
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

Hitler was the most powerful leader that humanity have ever seen. But the actions that were dictated by this leader were damaging and unfair. He killed thousands of people and almost destroyed a nation. We don't know what he was like inside, may be he was a good person with his wife. But we can't judge by that. We can only judge by looking at his actions. And what he has done to the world shall never be repeated again.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Good

...and almost destroyed a nationwhat nation did hitler almost destroy? If youre taking about germany, then your waaaayyyyy off. Hitler saved and rebuilt germany after the allies destroyed it. If your taking about the aftermath, then the allies destroyed it. If your taking about france, they were the ones responsible destroying germany, so it was pretty much revenge. Good; adj; of high quality: excelent. I think hitler fits this discription. He was a great orator. One of, if not, the best in the world since he was very pursuasive. He was a "high quality" soldier since he received 2 iron crosses (1 first class, 1 2nd class) in world war 1. He was an exellent leader since he led the small national socialist german workers (nsdap or nazis) from a minority group to the largest party in germany and made them win many seats in the reichstag. He was also a great artist. I'm not kidding, look up his art. He originally wanted to be an artist.Good: adj; morraly good righteaous. Hitler was a vegetarian and often gave graphic discriptions of animals being slaughtered to make dinner guests shun meat. He banned vivsection, rebuilt the german economy and restored national pride- something absent for the end of wwi to his rule. He protected animals, put into action severe hunting restrictions and because of his actions, many endangered animals are still around. He even sent many men to concentraion camps for breaking these laws He enforced family values and even launched one of the molst succesful anti-smoking campaigns.. he even commisioned the invention for a cheap, efficient car the average german could afford: the volkswagon (literally peoples car).Bad: adj of poor quality: inferior. Does he fit this discription?
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

"Bad" is kind of underselling it, doncha think?
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

He ordered genocide on millions of people. He was evil incarnate.
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

I say Hitler was one of the worst people to ever exist, I listen to the people what happen in those camp's the horrible thing that happen to them. They saw children die, the elderly suffer. The people in those camp would last for 9 month then die
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

Holocaust and World War 2 Hitler cased and he (kids cover your eyes and ears)@$#@$#%@$#@%$#@#@%$#@%$#@$%#@%$#@%$#@#@%#$@%#$@#@%$#@%#$@%$@#$@$#@%$@%$#%#$@
Debate: Was Hitler good or bad?
Side: Bad

I posted on wrong side. I think because he lostLOST =BAD. LolHe was a great EVOLUTION master. Just bad strategist