azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

The person who wrote the bible would be alive.. So no he would not know.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

I think if you want an afterlife, you get one. If you don't, you just fly off into darkness with no conscience!
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Nothing... dead is dead.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

So you mean when we die there is going to be nothing? How boring a afterlife it would be. I would be bored.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

You won't be bored... you won't be anything. Don't get me wrong... I'd love to float off to some paradise for all eternity but I just don't see that happening any more than me being sucked down to some fiery underworld where some dude is always poking me with a pitchfork for all time.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Whether or not an afterlife exists is not necessitated upon your feelings of boredom. Regardless, it may seem boring to you now, but if there is nothing after death, not even a conscience, you wouldn't be feeling bored, I can assure you.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

really so what about people who are resecitated they were dead then back alive even if its not in the same context they still come alive again like they do in heaven
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I'm not sure how "dead" these people actually were... try resurrecting one that's been dead for a week. I suspect it will be difficult.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

well the point is that jesus can do anything including ressurect things and people
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

Well I'm atheist and don't believe any of that... in my opinion if Jesus did exist he was just a man and after his death... nothing... his conscience ceased to be. The existence of god cannot be proven or dis-proven so we all just have to go with our gut.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

then explain where the bible came from p.s i do respect your views
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

The existence of the bible doesn't make it true... What about the koran? Is that all true? There are thousands of different religions around the world... the majority of them most likely came into existence because people feared death and made up stories to make their children feel better. I don't normally discuss religion much... it's really a matter of opinion and I respect anyone of any faith as long as they respect me.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

i respect you but i also like a good debate so i will answer no the koran is not true but the bible is supported by tons of evidence including the red sea scrolls and what about golgotha where jesus died look it up its real
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

Noah and the ark is in the bible... do you believe that actually happened?
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

yes i do in fact it makes sense there are tons of fossiles on mountains so high nothing could survive. they obviously got there by rising water
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Well I can't believe that a man and his family was able to collect two of every animal in the world and get them on that boat. I meant no disrespect I was just curious if you believed it or not because several Christians that I know have admitted that they don't necessarily believe all the stories in the old testament as they are a lot more grandiose than the stories in the new testament. Anyway, it's obvious that we aren't going to settle anything today, or ever... but thanks for remaining civil.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

oh well, we have tried our best to sway the other side but as you said we are not getting anywhere.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

yes i do in fact it makes sense there are tons of fossiles on mountains so high nothing could survive. Because no mountain that exists today was always as high as it is. Mountains most frequently form by the collisions of plates which push up the boundaries. The fossils were accrued at a point when they were lower. they obviously got there by rising waterThat would only be obvious if the water was here today. Since it is not, since there is not anywhere NEAR enough water to account for the flood, than it is anything but obvious. Water doesn't just disappear, you know. This doesn't even account for any of the hundreds of other reasons why the Ark is impossible, but we'll deal with these one at a time, sir.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

The obvious answer is someone wrote it. Where else could it have come from, nobody has ever stated that God wrote it.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

actually it says in one of the first five books that god told abraham all of this so that he could fulfil gods purpose therefore god in effect did write it
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

Did Abraham then go and write the bible? No, he didn't, some one else did, maybe Moses, maybe not. The point is even the bible itself does not claim that it was written by God, merely written by man.Divine inspiration is on the face of it, a ridiculous way of communicating with a people you designed, especially if you chose to communicate through allegory and parable and then designed your people to each interpret it in myriad ways.It would appear common sense to assume that the bible is the word of wise yet archaic men, as it is if followed correctly logically flawed and if followed as said allegory confusing, especially in the view that it is the word of an all-knowing entity.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

They are, in medical terms considered dead. But there is still life in their cells. A person can have a brain death, and be determined dead while their heart is still beating, as long as they are unable to breath on their own without a machine. In fact, it is when a person is declared to be dead by way of brain death when their organs are harvested as their organs still need to be alive at the time of harvest.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

that doesnt matter they are dead and their soul is already somewhere else
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

soul? do you mean consciousness? Consciousness is a product of the brain, a part of our body. If our body dies, even if we have a brain death, our consciousness doesn't persist.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

I don't think so, because after our death we will go to next life,which is divided into two places like heaven and hell...maybe you are not religious and you have own views but at the same time we should know that Allah is great!
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Thanks for your opinion... but it is my opinion that Allah is not great as Allah does not exist.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I don't know why, but this 'dispute' comment made me laugh my ass off XD
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

There is life after death. You go to hell, if you believe in false gods and don't invite Jesus into your heart. Or you can go to heaven to be with god. All you have to do is invite god into your heart, and follow him. In the end you go to hell or heaven it is your call people! In the end follow Jesus with all your heart and you will go to heaven, follow false gods and don't invite god into your heart well... sorry but your going to hell!
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

i think your statement not correct, but it is your point of view and we should respect each others thoughts. In my imagination there is a life after the death and i believe in reincarnation.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

How about 'Life without death?' It's only a change in one word in the sentence.And it's far more likely to happen then religious ideas about life and death.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

How about 'Life without death?' Why would you want to live forever?
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

Just for shits and giggles... see what happens on down the line... but if I would have to work forever and my health wasn't excellent then screw that!
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Why would you not want to live forever?
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

What benefits are there that you would want to live forever?
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

What benefits are there that would make you want to die?
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

I pretty sure that I asked first.----------------------------------
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I answered your question with a question. Now you're avoiding the subject.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

I answered your question with a question. Now you're avoiding the subject.Actually, I did the same first.I won't want to live one second without liberty, so if I was immortal, and I had no freedom, I would rather not live forever.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I find it silly for you to assume that freedom equals happiness. Such a statement tells me you don't know what you need yet to complete your existence.I, on the other hand, do. I'd agree with you that I wouldn't want to live a second longer if I didn't have it, but the problem is that if I can live forever, then I can have that thing forever also.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

I find it silly for you to assume that freedom equals happiness.I find it silly for you to assume that freedom doesn't equal happiness.If freedom is not happiness, then oppression equal happiness for you.Such a statement tells me you don't know what you need yet to complete your existence.Making a erroneous statement only makes you look imperious. I know my existence.If this is someI, on the other hand, do. Congratulations. then I can have that thing forever also.You still haven't mention what makes you want to live forever.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

If freedom is not happiness, then oppression equal happiness for you.Freedom and a lack thereof are not black and white. Your statement is clouded and therefore incorrect.Making a erroneous statement only makes you look imperious. I know my existence.Your response shows that my statement was not erroneous. I didn't ask if you 'knew your existence', I asked if you 'knew what made you complete'.The fact that you mixed this up in your head shows that you are indeed incomplete.Furthermore, you couldn't possibly have what makes your life truly worth living if you would give it up whilst having not the choice to give it up.You still haven't mention what makes you want to live forever.Because if given the choice to live forever, I have no reason not to live forever.
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

we can't live forever, because all things on the earth have a deadline
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Sure, but plastics and metals live for millions of years or more.So in a way, no, not all things on Earth have a decline.But my real point is that there's no reason to assume that everything has to come to an end.Maybe one day, certain things won't have to.When that day comes, why choose to not live?
Debate: Life after death
Side: Yes, sure

I would not want to live forever because firstly, evolution would turn you into a caveman freak, secondly, you would have to hide your identity because religious freaks will come hoarding at you, thirdly, your mind still ages mentally and will get clogged up over the over-years, fourthly, time will seem so fast that you will turn insane, fifthly, you will eventually get trapped somewhere forever, and lastly, you will never be able to love anyone again (because they keep on dying of age) the immense, eternal, emotional trauma would be too much to bear.All these things add up to a fate that is worse than death.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I would not want to live forever because firstly, evolution would turn you into a caveman freakWhat...? Evolution does not make things lesser. This entire statement is tripping.you would have to hide your identity because religious freaks will come hoarding at youNot if religious ignorance becomes nonexistent with time.you would have to hide your identity because religious freaks will come hoarding at youEvolution solves these problems.time will seem so fast that you will turn insaneOnce again, evolution solves these problems.you will eventually get trapped somewhere foreverFor the last time, evolution solves these problems.you will never be able to love anyone again (because they keep on dying of age) the immense, eternal, emotional trauma would be too much to bear.If I could live forever, why not everyone else? Why not everyone I love? I'm not special. How dare you assume I'd want to carry out eternal life by myself. That would be a fate worse then death. How stupid do you think I am to believe I should have it alone?
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Yeah, sure,it is better to debate or to give our views about this theme... just imagine a life without death...it will be cool (:
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Death is inevitable, death comes to everything including the stars, moon and galaxy.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I think that live after death exists, but not like angels, souls. i think that every human's brain spreads waves. Those waves have information, codes. We cannot see them or feel, but sometimes people see them like a ghost. I think that ghosts is group of codes, information which across between each other.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I believe that death exists quite literally in the form of nothingness. Once you die, Your body starts losing the capability of anything similar to that of a living being, indicating that you are or have died. I noticed an argument considering how people may be defined as 'dead' by doctors and the like, and then brought back to life, You have to understand however, that is not really death, but more like a reinstatement of what you were as your body began to function again. Inbetween this, you are dragged into the state of nothingness, being death.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Yes, after death the body starts to decompose, but the soul will be alive until someone thinks about us.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I won't say it is not possible, but the concept is not supported by any reliable evidence. To believe in something without evidence is not very useful. Everything our experience tells us is that existence is finite. Speculations that try to refute this are simply born out of fear of that temporary existence.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Of all of the religion-based psalms and poems dedicated to making humans less afraid of dying, not one of them is so effective I think than the far more likely, and more elequently said (since Twain is a much better writter than those who put together any "holy" book of any religion) is:“I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit.”
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I could never handle dealing with the pricks of the Earth for any longer then I have too. Having to deal with them for eternity sounds like a fate most horrid.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Well kids, you see the thing about death is - you are no longer alive (lifeless...in case that was too hard to understand for you).
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

No one living soul can not predict or anticipate what will happen after the death. I don`t believe in life after death. Nobody checked it, or asked God what is going on after the death and it`s not possible argue about it.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

Life after death is just wishful thinking brought up on fear. Death is just the same as killing a germ or squashing a bug. The thing is, we were lucky to get our big brains and with that, we took pride in ourselves. I think death will be absolute nothing. We won't think, we won't see because our thoughts of our being and existence is in our minds and when it is mention from other people. When we die our mind deteriorates. It will be 100% neutrality and tranquility and we won't give a damn when were floating in the dark void of death- coz we dead! We won't be happy and we won't even be sad.
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

I hate it how people dislike comments because they are mad but don't bother to reply to explain why. Perhaps it's just the fear
Debate: Life after death
Side: No, it is not possible

If completely dispersed, you could only leave behind echoes/ripples. Ghosts are technically not dead- undead, so they don't count. Same with minor deities, immortals, et.c.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

Management education is a continuous learning process where we understand how people really think and we can develop our leadership skills and also learn how to work together as a team. We can move up the ladder of success quickly!
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

more than technical knowledge a person should equally possess the qualities that an employer should have. if at all it is about technical knowledge then we have many other areas to attain that skill. bot in my opinion management education focuses more on employment education rather than technical knowledge.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

good point. mere technical education may make you an employee, along with , if have management education, will lead to career growth
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

Management education is one discipline of higher education by which students are taught to be business leaders,managers and administrator's.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Not so good

what about other level of employees? Doesn't they require management education?
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

yes they surely require. every level of organization should have scope of management education. the top level should get the work done, for which management education is required. the lower level management should have knowledge as to what should be done, how should the work be done and so on. so for all the levels it is surely essential.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

of course , everyone can think of management skill and can be acquired even with experience. may take little longer time. management education is not a must , but skills matters
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Not so good

They are thought the important concepts to be a leader and when they apply them in corporate life they become a successful leader .
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

No entrepreneur can succeed alone. A well aligned team with passion and purpose can exponentially accelerate the growth of an enterprise. so management education can helps the development of team work
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

yes it develops team work because,we day the students are assigned different activities like group presentation and many other activities that let the student be ready to adapt with different people for completing the common goals or targets
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

Management education is good for students and in management they face the situation in a practical manner and how to overcome to manage the situation in a company and in work place
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

efficiency is needed more than effectiveness and efficiency is gained through excellence if we know how to manage the technical part on daily basis both can be helpful together.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

management education helps us to deal with the people whereas technical education is restricted to only system work.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

Yes i agree management education is good .Without management, technology is left unrecognized. Management is the backbone of an organization
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

Well said sravan, it's true.........................................................
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

management education helps to set a plan ,organise the plan and more over it helps to reach the goal in a effective manner. where we can learn new things and strategies in a systematic way.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

management can create employment but if it is on a technical basis there are many components which has to be counted there are fields where there is use of core technical people are used and not everywhere management education is needed but management can help people to work in a efficient way is what management teaches and helps to show your leadership skills even better.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

yes i agreed with your point technical can't make people to improve the skills
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Not so good

yeah but management education is something which we need to have and the organisation will judge you on the basis of your performance not on your technical skills, as we can gain technical knowledge but ethics cant be teached
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

managements education help the students to get practical knowledge of different situations and help them to react according to the current problems,
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Not so good

I think they prepare the students for upcoming future problems which cannot be anticipated in the normal run of a business.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Not so good

Many organisations problems can solve by the management employees only
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

I feel management education is an employment creator because as we will get to know the professional values and also know how to behave in the work place which will be help us to perform the job well
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

It teaches us the professional values, which will be helpful in the work place because we can gain technical knowledge through training.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

Technical education is which makes us learn to create or develop things....Management is what which helps to organize things accordingly with a set of guidelines which are already there in it......Without management an organisation cannot exist...so definitely it is an employment creator over technical education.
Debate: Management education is an employment creator over Technical education
Side: Good

I found something good in the argument. Yah, simple tech education may not really make you to organize