azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

The Big Bang theory is just a theory it can be wrong and it can be right. There is also plenty of evidence that God exists but you don't care enough to look it up. But the whole idea of rocks smashing into rocks to create the earth is just bull crap. In order to make the earth you have to have a someone to create the earth. The earth can't be made by itself it needs a creator to create it.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

The Big Bang theory is just a theory it can be wrong and it can be right.The Big Bang theory isn't a theory, it's a scientific theory. "A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."There is also plenty of evidence that God exists but you don't care enough to look it up.No, there isn't. There's arguments for God's existence, but there is no actual evidence.In order to make the earth you have to have a someone to create the earth.No, you don't.The earth can't be made by itself it needs a creator to create it.Sure it can. Why can't it?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

No, you don't.Yes you do need a creator to create things. What about the the things we use every single day like a cell phone, computer, video game consoles, houses, etc they weren't created by themselves someone created them it the exact same thing with the earth. The earth can't be created by itself it needs a creator to make things. Nothing can't be made into something. Sure it can. Why can't it?Read my argument above it applies to the same thing.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Yes you do need a creator to create things.What made God?What about the the things we use every single day like a cell phone, computer, video game consoles, houses, etc they weren't created by themselves someone created them it the exact same thing with the earth. The earth can't be created by itself it needs a creator to make things. Nothing can't be made into something.Shitty comparison.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

What made God?No one made God he existed before time began and before He made the earth.Shitty comparison.Its true since all of the those stuff we use in our everyday lives have a creator that made those objects.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

No one made God he existed before time began and before He made the earth.That's a contradiction, dude. You just said everything needed a creator. This includes God.Its true since all of the those stuff we use in our everyday lives have a creator that made those objects.Uh... no. Those are artificial items, the Earth isn't. Ergo. it's a shitty comparison.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

That's a contradiction, dude. You just said everything needed a creator. This includes God.Well God doesn't need a creator since He was there in the very beginning maybe He willed himself into existence? Who knows? You can ask Him when you die. That's what I am going to ask him.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Oh, I'll have quite a few questions for God, if he truly exists.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

OK, I won't waste my time... it appears others have done an adequate job anyway.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Yah and you kind of did waste your time asking me that question. It appears that in the video that the guy said that no one has been able to argue about the 2 major flaws in evolution and hasn't said a word so I think the guy did a good job. Nuff said.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Now now, I think a certain "OliverJDH" would be rather vexed at that claim. From what I've read, it seems he made an articulate and informed rebuttal to your video.What in particular do you disagree with him about, seeing as you didn't respond to his argument?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

I choose not to refute his argument because I am going to move on because I already stated my opinion and there is nothing else to argue about.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

So do you think he was right in what he said ?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

But it was kinda proven so you are a little but wrong their.... Awkward
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Don't be so credulous, assuming you can not be.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

this argument is already invalid because: (1) it states evolution says life came from non life. Abiogenesis is not evolution. (2) life can come from non-life under certain conditions. see the Miller-Urey experiment.(3) yes humans are humans and apes are apes. Evolution says nothing to the contrary.(4) The theory of evolution as we understand it today has only been around for roughly 150 years. How could we have observed a process of evolution that takes millions of years?(5) slight evolutionary changes have been observed. See Darwins fiches.(6)There is no such thing as "molecule to man" evolution.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

And do you know what this "Miller-Urey" experiment illustrates...? It takes a CREATOR!The idea of evolution has been around for much much longer than 150 years. It has just gotten "popular" due to the immorality of man. Exactly, we can't observe millions of years, thats where it leaves the realm of science and becomes religion. (Faith)Darwin's finches? Yes and they all came from, guess what, a pair of finches! Darwin also implies that birds and plants have a same ancestor. Are you trying to tell me you think a bird is related to the banana I ate earlier?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Two answers:Transitional FossilsMiller-Urey ExperimentOne Suggestion:A 10th grade Science textbookhttp://ncert.nic.in/NCERTS/textbook/textbook.htm?jesc1=9-16
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v14/n4/fossils "Dr Eldredge [curator of invertebrate palaeontology at the American Museum] said that the categories of families and above could not be connected, while Dr Raup [curator of geology at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago] said that a dozen or so large groups could not be connected with each other. But Dr Patterson [a senior palaeontologist and editor of a prestigious journal at the British Museum of Natural History] spoke most freely about the absence of transitional forms... One reader wrote a letter to Dr Patterson asking why he did not put a single photograph of a transitional fossil in his book. On April 10, 1979, he replied to the author in a most candid letter as follows: ‘. . . I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them.'"Miller and Urey experiment has no backing either. They excluded oxygen in the experiment because anything they created would oxidize and life would not form. However, with no oxygen in reality then one of the key components in the soup, ammonia, would be destroyed because UV light destroys it and UV light is stopped by the o-zone. Next, amino acids along with poisonous tar was created along side one another. The tar alone would kill any life that would possibly form but amino acids are not life so there was no life to kill from the tar.If you watched the video series I posted it shows that this experiment is a lie that is in the text books.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

They excluded oxygen in the experiment because anything they created would oxidize and life would not form Oxygen is the second-most chemically active element. No matter how much free oxygen was in the Earth's primordial atmosphere to begin with, that oxygen would have quickly (on a geological timescale) reacted with other existing matter to form various molecules (i.e., carbon dioxide, water, ferrous or ferric oxide, etc), thus eliminating free oxygen from the primordial atmosphere. Therefore, either oxygen's properties were very different in the primordial atmosphere, or there wasn't a significant amount of oxygen in Earth's primordial atmosphere.Outgassing experiments performed in late 2005 by Bruce Fegley of Washington University now suggest that the earth's early atmosphere was in fact a reducing oneHowever, with no oxygen in reality then one of the key components in the soup, ammonia, would be destroyed because UV light destroys it and UV light is stopped by the o-zone.This is thePerfectionist Fallacy (UV exposure doesn't have to be all or nothing) andJumping to Conclusions fallacy (that life developed where it would have been exposed to UV)  When simple organic molecules are held together in a fairly concentrated area, such as stuck to a dust or ice grain, the UV light actually enhances the formation of more complex molecules by breaking some bonds and allowing the molecules to recombine (Bernstein et al. 1999; Cooper et al. 2001). DNA and RNA are relatively resistant to UV light, because some parts of the molecules shelter others and damage to the bases can provide the materials to repair the backbone. UV light gives nucleic acids a selective advantage and may in fact have been an essential ingredient for abiogenesis (Mulkidjanian et al. 2003; Mullen 2003). The molecules need not all have stayed exposed to UV for long. Some would have dissolved in oceans and lakes. In one proposed scenario, the complex organic molecules form in the deep ocean around geothermal vents, well away from ultraviolet light. Ultraviolet radiation is the weakest form of ionizing radiation, and the argument's implication is that it creates an all-or-nothing scenario, where life either could not have existed in such an environment (making abiogenesis wrong), or else such an environment never existed (setting up a false dilemma). The premise is not true, however. UV radiation is not as ionizing as the argument requires. The tar alone would kill any life that would possibly form but amino acids are not life so there was no life to kill from the tar.Its needed. Cyanide and formaldehyde are necessary building blocks for important biochemical compounds, including amino acids. They are not toxins in this context.Miller-Urey experiments produce amino acids among other chemical compoundsJack Szostaks abiogenesis experiment is the most successful out there.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

That video pretty much sums evolution :P Good find srom :)
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Thank You Vermink at least someone on here agrees with the stuff I put out! Thanks for the support!
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

You are an idiot. Where is the proof that "God" made everything? Wait their is not because the bible was written by men. Plain and simple.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

theres no proof for evolution either -_-//////////////////////////////////////////
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

yes there is.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

prove it then///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

It's not that hard to google proof of evolution.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

I ahve before didnt change my mind one bit and why cant you tell me?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Just because we do simliar things such as eat,sleep,reproduce,etc doesnt mean evolution is real and if evolution is so real how come we still ahvent evolved?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

if evolution is so real how come we still ahvent evolved?1). We really have no reason to evolve2). It takes a long time to evolve 3). For all we know we are currently in the evolving process.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

You know what your not even worth my time, your arguments are weak and you cant come up with great excuses so you know what why bother arguing with an idiot if hes gonna keep amking up lame excuses (and dont give me any of that bs saying well I guess I got under animedude's skin and the answer is no you didnt your arguments are just weak so i decided not to argue with someone who cant keep up with mine.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

great excuses so you know what why bother arguing with an idiotyeah i don';t know why i bother arguing with you.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

until you can make up a great enough excuse as to why evolution exists then I might argue some more with you but for now your not worth my time.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Ah so you are one of those people who insults people when they can't think of a rebuttal?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Since when did I insult I just said I wasnt gonna argue with you anymore
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Also you need to stop beliving we can evolve like pokemon this is the real world not a pokemon world, to be honest I think alot athiests are just plain childish thinking we can evolve just like pokemon XD
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Also you need to stop beliving we can evolve like pokemon this is the real world not a pokemon world, to be honest I think alot athiests are just plain childish thinking we can evolve just like pokemonWhere did i say i think evolution is like pokemon?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

You didint but its still pretty childish to think we evolve............................
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

It's not childish if you actually read up on evolution.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

are you stupid or something I told you i did and I still didnt think it was true omg do you even listen?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

like i said insults when you can't refute an argument.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

How was that an insult,do u even know what an insult is I said I looked at evolution online and I still thought it was false so tell me how is that an insult?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

are you stupid or somethingOr don't you consider that an insult?I said I looked at evolution online and I still thought it was falseYou sure you didn't pull up a Pokemon website?
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

are you stupid or somethingOr don't you consider that an insult?Well no offense but you do act stupidYou sure you didn't pull up a Pokemon website?Im pretty sure I know the diffrence between a false theory and a video game(but anyways why dont you keep living in your pokemon evolution fantasy)
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Im pretty sure I know the diffrence between a false theory and a video game(but anyways why dont you keep living in your pokemon evolution fantasy)I forgot how closed minded some people are.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

I forgot how closed minded some people are.you mean people like you??????????????????????????????
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

No people like you.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

you mean people like you??????????????????????????????Says the person who thinks evolution is like Pokemon evolution.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Says the person who thinks evolution is like Pokemon evolution.Pokemon evolve do they not????and it kinda is if you think about ti accept you know without the whole fighting thing and leveling up
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

alot athiests are just plain childishSays the person who thinks he has a all powerful imaginary friend.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

hahah I know you would have a comeback like that XD and since when did I say I was christian I never I was christian (even though I am) and stop putting god into the subject, this isnt about god.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Good video against evolution. I agree with those two points. Thanx
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

It's a load of cr*p!!!!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS5vid4GkEY are better
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Okay... I just watched the first video in the series. And this "science teacher" (I doubt he actually is what he claims to be) is an idiot.-He claims the Big Bang theory is false, but he never gives any reason why it is. He simply opts to believe creationism.-He claims the Earth isn't billions of years old, but gives no reason to suggest why it isn't.-He claims the "caveman" (i.e. the Neanderthals) didn't exist, yet there is proof that they existed. He never gives any proof to the contrary.-Finally, he claims dinosaurs didn't live billions of years ago, but instead, he follows the Bible in that they lived with humans.This guy isn't a science teacher; he's a preacher.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

The point of the video isn't to show creationism, it is to show that the theory of evolution is not accurate and that all the "evidence" they have is not real.There isn't any evidence for the Big Bang, the methods for dating the earth are not trustworthy, what cave man? and Job 40 and 41.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

The point of the video isn't to show creationism, it is to show that the theory of evolution is not accurate and that all the "evidence" they have is not real.I don't care, he is still an idiot. Why should I believe his "evidence" when he makes unsubstantiated assertions?There isn't any evidence for the Big BangUhhhh... Yes, yes there is. There's an immense amount of evidence for the Big Bang theory.the methods for dating the earth are not trustworthyI'll give you the fact you do have an argument (though an albeit weak one) here. I'd say it's more flawed, then untrustworthy, though.what cave man?1:55 in the first video in the series.and Job 40 and 41.Nope. Don't give a shit about scripture. Not until the Bible has been verified, that is.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

What evidence is there of the big bang and the cave man? I'm asking you to find the evidence for me to see.I don't want speculation and assumptions, I want proof.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Observational_evidence Obviously, it isn't 100% verified. But there's no evidence for the existence of God.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

So it is a faith............ thats all I needed to hear! haha
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

It's not a faith. Faith, by definition, is "a belief without evidence." Now, provide evidence God exists. :D
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Yes, that is one definition of faith. And God does have proof. The Laws of Thermodynamics prove that a God/Designer had to have created everything. You must deny the Laws of Thermodynamics to disprove God, otherwise God exists.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

? Bullshit. Consider conways game of life, where both chaotic, expansive features can be seen and its because of the complex formations the cells form. These formations either stabilize, or like thermodynamics states "cool off". The formation of "complex" structures(undoubtedly your argument) is in no way a violation of the laws of thermodynamics, which is a statistical large scale phenomenon.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

I'm not even going to argue with that... Here is an article on Penn State's site:http://www.personal.psu.edu/jmc6/second_law.html Read the article then we can dispute over whether or not there is a God or not.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Without searching for it, could you please summarize the relevant law of thermodynamics that has been been claimed to prove that God must have created everything?Then could you please explain how the entirety of evolution happens in an isolated system, and how evolution necessitates that life has gotten more complex, and why the law - which refers to energy, entropy, and levels of multiplicity - would refer to genes in this instance. A basic understanding of science + the laws of thermodynamics should make it blindingly obvious that there is no basis in your argument.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

1) In a closed system, matter cannot be created or destroyed.2) In a closed system, things go from complexity to simplicity (entropy)I'm not talking about "the theory of evolution" which is restrained to biology in this instance. This is a case about the universe which is cosmological evolution - as can be seen with debating about the big bang (and yes, there is a thing of it, because psychology, geology, etc. refer to psychological evolution, geological evolution, etc.). Did you even read the article I posted above? http://www.personal.psu.edu/jmc6/second_law.html
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

You see, you are just as badas the one you say is an idiot!You make statements without giving proof / reason as well!It takes MORE "faith" to belive in evolution than it does creation, considering the fact that life doesn't come from non-living matter, and every single thing we see and touch was created by someone. Why not we ourselves? Why not life?You need to read the book "The Earth's Most Challenging Mysteries," by Reginald Daly. Every page gives evidence for a global flood, just as the Bible said.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

You said you dont give a shit about scripture until it is verified... verified by who? i believe in the Big Bang... I simply believe it is the description of an event (by scientists), to say an event that has been described by Judeo-christianity did not happen which is counter productive and evidence to many scientists occultic origin, that you probably dont even know about. How does a belief in magic reconcile with science? it does not.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: False

Actually yes there is lots of evidence for the Big Bang; the ratio of hydrogen to helium (76:24), cosmic microwave background radiation and redshift (the idea that the universe is continually expanding and growing). We can also derive, from the second law of thermo dynamics that the universe is cooling but I shall leave that out before things become too complicated. The Universe's light-element abundance is another important criterion by which the Big Bang hypothesis is verified. It is understood that light elements were formed within the first few minutes of the Big Bang while elements heavier than helium (beryllium) are thought to have their origins in the interiors of stars which formed much later. After the light elements (e.g. deuterium) were formed the temperature of the universe fell far below that of which is required for nuclear fusion. According to stellar theory, deuterium cannot be produced in stellar interiors; in actual fact it is destroyed inside of stars. The Big Bang Nucleosynthesis theory predicts that roughly 25% the mass of the Universe consists of Helium and the fact that helium is nowhere seen to have an abundance below 23% mass is very strong evidence that the Universe went through an early hot phase. Which is where thermodynamics comes in, as the universe is expanding (redshift) it is also cooling leading scientists to suggest that it could end in a 'Big Crunch'. Further support for the BBT and BBN comes from the consistency of the other light element abundances for one particular baryon density and an independent measurement of the baryon density from the anisotropies in the readings of cosmic microwave background radiation. So yes, there is in fact a LOT of evidence for the Big Bang but I cannot stress this enough- IT IS STILL ONLY A THEORY, I just wish over-excited Christians would stop treating it as if we 'non-believers' have foubd all the answers. And, you have to be an atheist to support the BBT.
Debate: Evolution is a lie
Side: True

Let me disprove it to you right here and now.Do you believe in centrifugal force?Do you believe in Newton's laws of physics?Do you believe in gravity?Do you believe the Big Bang was an expanse or an explosion?And in science a "theory" is considered "fact," so I'm told at least by atheists/agnostics alike. Most Christians say that it is "just a theory" but then people will respond by saying that gravity is just a theory too.P.S. You actually present good arguments. I appreciate that! Hopefully you are open minded too... haha :)