azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

- A few countries have already abolished the capital punishment, or at least made it more humane. If society can grow for the better, then everyone will doubt the righteousness of this punishmentThanks for agreeing with me.- It HAS been abolished and declared illegal. Currently, its called "Human Trafficking"Slavery hasn't been abolished. To abolish something is to remove the practice completely around the world. Unfortunately it still exists in many parts of the world and a lot of the products that the first world enjoys are made by slaves.So in reality the system just moved it away from the public eye.Out of sight out of mind, correct?-sighMy friend, there is a difference between "medicine" and "illegal drugs". Its not double standards when the one at fault is the lack of appropriate words in the English DictionaryActually, medicine is a loose term for a variety of practices, treatments and including but not limited to drugs.A drug is a substance that has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body, in particular.So I stand correct when I say it's a double standard because they tell you to say no to drugs but, those drugs are alright (most of the time the doctors are giving a lot of nasty shit to you that is just as bad as street drugs in terms of health destructiveness). They say to you "Say no to drugs" but, never tell you that oxygen is a drug.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Unfortunately it still exists in many parts of the world- Nope, you're referring to the third world countries who are so poor and uncultured that they have no connection to the world market. If they cannot bring themselves to the global trade or accepted by it, then I believe that they are not a part of the worldSo I stand correct when I say it's a double standard because they tell you to say no to drugs but, those drugs are alright-My friend, you only question the dictionary and definition of drugs. But you do not understand the authority of the doctor. Just give it upBy the way, why didnt you raise an argument on my last paragraph?
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

then I believe that they are not a part of the worldYou're stupid.My friend, you only question the dictionary and definition of drugs. But you do not understand the authority of the doctor. Just give it upI do not question the dictionary on this front. I'm telling you exactly what those two words mean and the differences between them. I do understand the authority of the doctor. Which is why I know that they can murder you and tell you "they did all they could". Vaccinations contain mercury and cause autism and depression drugs cause addiction. They are the same damn thing as a drug dealer that sells drugs on the street. Did you know that every medication that has been patented comes from a natural source made synthetic just so they can make money? YOU just give up. By the way, why didnt you raise an argument on my last paragraph?Because I know that programs like MK-ULTRA and propaganda and clever tricks will actually make you believe in abstract concepts like morality and whatever it may entail. You will be conditioned to go along with anything.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

You're stupid-Nope, your not a part of the society if you wont get off the computer. Your not a part of the world, if your not a part of the global trade system. Thats how it worksI do understand the authority of the doctor. Which is why I know that they can murder you and tell you "they did all they could". Vaccinations contain mercury and cause autism and depression drugs cause addiction. They are the same damn thing as a drug dealer that sells drugs on the street.-This are some strong accusations. I hope you have a link to back up your claimsBecause I know that programs like MK-ULTRA and propaganda and clever tricks will actually make you believe in abstract concepts like morality and whatever it may entail. You will be conditioned to go along with anything.-You did not even read that paragraph did you?
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

Nope, your not a part of the society if you wont get off the computer. Your not a part of the world, if your not a part of the global trade system. Thats how it worksShow's how much you know. Society isn't the world you know. You precious global markets are run by crooks and offshore bankers.-This are some strong accusations. I hope you have a link to back up your claimshttp://www.naturalnews.com/001811.htmlhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/27/mercury-in-vaccines-was-replaced-with-something-even-more-toxic.aspxhttp://vran.org/health-risks/mercury-and-thimerosal-in-vaccines/(mercury in vaccines above)http://conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=10648http://conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=10361http://www.policymic.com/articles/6429/donald-trump-says-autism-caused-by-childhood-vaccinations(above: autism)http://www.dependency.net/learn/antidepressant/http://sciencenordic.com/scientist-antidepressants-cause-addictionhttp://www.allaboutcounseling.com/library/antidepressant-addiction-treatment/As for the murder aspect, I apologize I cannot provide any links to. However, my personal experience with the hospital (of which I don't have to prove jack shit to you) after my grandmother signed her death waver (saying do not resuscitate) and then was admitted into the hospital for a minor sickness. the doctors took her off her water pills (which they shouldn't have, they were prescription drugs given by a doctor to keep her kidneys functioning) and she screamed for me to help her. I frightened and clueless as to what was happening watched her die and the doctors in fact murdered her. Afterwords my aunt has since been taken to court for lawsuits involving her will. She refuses to give what she's supposed to give and has stolen 90,000 thousand from my family. You did not even read that paragraph did you?Yes i did. You said the morality of today will not be the morality of tomorrow and i said, they can make you believe what ever they want. There are programs available to US and Russian governments that can literally plant idea's into your head and you accept them as a godly command. You know very little about the documented powers that be. I can tell by how ignorant you are.(bill gates vaccines paralize)http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/08/bill-gates-polio-vaccine-program-caused- 47500-cases-of-paralysis-death/ (bill gates preaching killing 1 billion people with vaccines)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUJMR3BUm2s (news article Doctors are the third leading cause of death in the US)http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/07/30/doctors-death-part-one.aspx (doctors handwriting alone kills people)http://www.emirates247.com/news/emirates/death-by-prescription-doctors-handwriting-causes-7-000-deaths-a-year-2012-11-04-1.481418 http://www.activistpost.com/2013/02/death-by-doctor-vs-death-by-firearms.html http://www.flcv.com/iatrogen.html
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

(mercury in vaccines above)(above: autism)- Nice links, completely proves that you're armed. Unfortunately, you were misguided as the news was all disproven.. And called as "The most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years"As for the murder aspect, I apologize I cannot provide any links to.- You dont have to. Doctors undergo certain physical and mental tests to ensure the safety of their patients. They have no right to murder a patient unless its a permitted euthanasia. Disobedience can render their permit useless.Im sorry for your family, though(bill gates vaccines paralize)(bill gates preaching killing 1 billion people with vaccines)(news article Doctors are the third leading cause of death in the US)(doctors handwriting alone kills people)- Again, nice links. But I see no correlation in blaming it on the doctors. What I see instead is the rate of unqualified doctors and scientists in the US. Our argument was about your claim that "Also, the whole drug campaign is really a double standard. "say no to drugs" but, please allow your doctor to deal you drugs."Please dont devate it on some other issues (very informative, though)
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

↓ Add Link or Embed Video↓ Show Help | Nevermind The argument you are disputing:Centifolia(567) Disputed1 point(mercury in vaccines above)(above: autism)- Nice links, completely proves that you're armed. Unfortunately, you were misguided as the news was all disproven.. And called as "The most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years"no convincing scientific evidence supports these claimsThis is probably coming from the same people that said GMO's are harmless. I wont buy it. You dont have to. Doctors undergo certain physical and mental tests to ensure the safety of their patients. They have no right to murder a patient unless its a permitted euthanasia. Disobedience can render their permit useless.They still do and still get away with it. Third leading cause of death in the US is doctor and health care incompetence. 106,000 being attributed to the drugs doctors prescribe.Again, nice links. But I see no correlation in blaming it on the doctors. What I see instead is the rate of unqualified doctors and scientists in the US. And that's no reason to blame doctors?Our argument was about your claim that "Also, the whole drug campaign is really a double standard. "say no to drugs" but, please allow your doctor to deal you drugs."Everything that doctors throw into your body is a drug. There is no other way to tell you that. I've looked at the medicine's you were talking about. Also, part of the argument. I've provided substantial argument on all fronts to the fact that they are just as dangerous as any street drug dealer the only difference is they are allowed to get away with it because they are "doctors".Centifolia, i implore you to look at the big picture. Oxy's, perks, morphine and many other synthetic "opiates" are prescribed by doctors with other drugs in them to destroy your liver and other such monstrosities to "prevent drug abuse" but, no one tells you what is actually inside it. For example the drug: Acetaminophen in Tylenol 3's does just that. Destroy your liver the more you use it. It has no other reason in being in the medication.http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PainNews/story?id=7699582&page=1#.Ua2BFZy5hqM
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

This is probably coming from the same people that said GMO's are harmless. I wont buy it.- Dude, this is wikipedia. You cant stand against the largest encyclopedia in the world, now would you?Unless, you will say that this is a conspiracy.They still do and still get away with it. Third leading cause of death in the US is doctor and health care incompetence. 106,000 being attributed to the drugs doctors prescribe.And that's no reason to blame doctors?-Dude, it is true that unqualified doctors are to blame for so many deaths, but at the same time, they are responsible for saving so many livesIf need someone to blame, blame the government branch who gave them the licenseEverything that doctors throw into your body is a drug. There is no other way to tell you that. I've looked at the medicine's you were talking about.I've provided substantial argument on all fronts to the fact that they are just as dangerous as any street drug dealer the only difference is they are allowed to get away with it because they are "doctors"- sigh You do realize that there is a difference between over-the-counter drugs and those that needed receipt from the doctors, right?They are called doctors because they were granted license to handle the strong medicines that can be addictive and damaging. Their ways of usage separates them from the illegal drugs sold in the black marketOxy's, perks, morphine and many other synthetic "opiates" are prescribed by doctors with other drugs in them to destroy your liver and other such monstrosities to "prevent drug abuse" but, no one tells you what is actually inside it.-My friend, have you ever realized that those drugs are given by doctors only when your case has become desperate? Every drug has its side effects and can be poisonous depending on usage. Its common sense in the field of medicine
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Wikipedia isn't 100% reliable and anyone can just walk in and change the articles. For all I know someone doctored that article to how they saw fit.- Good point. But if you wont trust Wikipedia, then google for "Thiomersal controversy". You will find the same opinions that disproves it as mere fraudUnfortunately, these doctors you are calling unqualified are in fact certified and deemed qualified by their schooling institutions and recognized as such by the government.Indeed, there are good and bad in every institution. However, that means you have to accept that there are some bogus doctors out there that are no better then your everyday drug dealer. I will not be blaming the government on this. I will blame the doctors responsible for the deaths of many. Responsibility to the responsible.- It appears that you already have the answer. But you fail to show your stand, and instead, kept on bragging about your knowledge in medicine as if you believe that a normal citizen has knowledge of it. Which was made worse by how you used your achievements as a way of being narcissistic.The flaws that you see in their field should be complained to the people who will really listen. Not here on a debate website.Simply saying a doctor is a doctor because they were granted license to handle strong drugs that can be addictive and damaging is such a shallow statement. I said it's a double standard practice in how doctors can sell you the same drugs that the government is telling you to say no to.It doesn't change the fact that it's a double standard and people still abuse them. Doctors are still selling the same drugs they(the government) tell you to say no to- As the doctors were licensed for their job, I see no problem in putting my trust on them. I have no background in chemistry so I have no rights to argue with them.Wont you do the same thing with soldiers, teachers, and parents?
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

- It appears that you already have the answer. But you fail to show your stand, and instead, kept on bragging about your knowledge in medicine as if you believe that a normal citizen has knowledge of it. Which was made worse by how you used your achievements as a way of being narcissistic.The flaws that you see in their field should be complained to the people who will really listen. Not here on a debate website.Yeah, that's because I'm not a bigot or ignorant. I have shown it just fine however, you on the other hand; are deviating from the debate more and more. Resorting to more and more personal attacks without being able to argue. If stating your accomplishments is bragging then I guess I am. However, I'd like to see anyone proud of there accomplishments not brag when stating them. However, you call me a narcissist. I assure you I am claiming no more self importance then I already have. I'm not claiming to be a politician or some legend based off my ego. I merely claim to know what I'm talking about and you don't. As the doctors were licensed for their job, I see no problem in putting my trust on them. I have no background in chemistry so I have no rights to argue with them.Wont you do the same thing with soldiers, teachers, and parents?See what I mean?
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

sighfirst off, you never even started a debate. You only gave me complains after complains about the flaws in the hospital. Second, theres a difference between personal attacks and honesty.But whatever, please take your issues somewhere else. Not here on a debate website.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

Fine, bye. :) My friend, there is a difference between "medicine" and "illegal drugs". By the way. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEDICINE AND ILLEGAL DRUGS.You are such a twat Centifolia. That's the truth. Do you think that emoting a sigh helps your arguments? I mean, how can I take you seriously when you are so confused but, actually believe you make any sense?http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/ 4365.html
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

sighClearing some things before you leave.1. Sighing is a non-verbal communication. Not a show of emotion2. You link contradicted your claim
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

1. Sighing is a non-verbal communication. Not a show of emotione·mote /iˈmōt/Verb(esp. of an actor) Portray emotion in a theatrical manner.A sigh is a non-verbal communication that is a long, deep, audible breath expressing sadness, relief, or tiredness.As I said an emote is a portrayal of emotion in a theatrical manor. 2. You link contradicted your claimNo it didn't"The difference is not necessarily in the marijuana or the way that it is grown, but in how it is used. Recreational marijuana users are looking for novel states of consciousness that are pleasant and interesting. Connoisseurs seek different highs for different circumstances and to create different moods.Medical marijuana users seek varieties that either modify conditions such as nausea or glaucoma, or act as analgesics or as pain separators. People who use it for psychological reasons look for qualities that relieve their gnawing symptoms" - from the articleMy whole claim this whole time is that the war on drugs is a double standard and that doctors or over glorified drug dealers. You have been trying to argue that drugs from the doctor are somehow different then street dealer. However, marijuana is clearly proving my claim.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Much as I love debates, I have no intention of beating the dead horse.I shall take my leave
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

Same thing was once said to capital punishment, slavery, piracy and drug abuse.Guess what happened? truly idiotic reply. Completely unrelated to the topic.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

No my friend, it is completely related. However, if you cannot understand what it means, then you do not deserve to argue further.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

You are very limited .
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Whatever.............................................................................
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

I wouldn't go so far as to say it heals and gives life (maybe sometimes gives life) but it's definitely not harmful.Overeating is harmful, Having unprotected sex with someone who you know has a disease is harmful, having sex for money with someone you know is not diseased, or watching two people have consensual sex is not harmful.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Read the articles provided in the description before adding an argument. The porn industry has dark secrets.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

You mean about it luring in the uneducated and abused to work there? I pretty much guessed that. I mean what self respecting woman with a college degree, and other job opportunities would let 14 guys 'finish' on her? I think none, maybe some got a fetish for it, I don't know. What I do know is, the uneducated, have to do something. Would you rather them be living on a street corner, doing what they're getting paid lots of money for now, for way less and in way less safe conditions? As for the sexually abused. That's not really the fault of the porn industry, that's the fault of the initial abuser for instilling them with that fear and mind set, all porn has managed to do for that person is offer them an outlet, and loads of money.I don't think it's harmful still, I think it's more or less nothing, if not positive. Yet I would hate to argue it's positive.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

I dont think I deserve this party invitation. (LOL , kidding)But seriously man, fix your English. I cannot understand your point
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Actually porn imcan be very harmful and can warp reality for the person watching it.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

Porn is not inherently harmful. It can be but it's not necessarily.Think about porn as medication. If someone who's not supposed to be watching porn is they'll take from it something they weren't supposed to, just like someone taking a medication they aren't supposed to will experience feelings they aren't supposed to.In the analogy, the porn and the medication has a purpose but like anything in human hands, can be abused.You say it can warp the reality of someone who watches it, and that is certainly the case for someone who does not know what sex is, then suddenly learns it like that. Yet for a person who may be in a committed relation ship and is looking to try new things, that may act as a tool of education or as an example. Not only is porn for the couples looking to try something new, but it is also for the single person (guy?) who is without a means to relieve their sexual frustration without going out and actually harming someone.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: Yes, but its a guilty pleasure

Porn is not medicine. Porn does more harm than good. Medicine is supposed to be good. These sites say so: http://theresurgence.com/2011/11/19/7-negative-effects-of-porn http://www.aarp.org/relationships/love-sex/info-02-2011/how-porn-hurts-men-sex-life.html http://simplemarriage.net/how-pornography-impacts-marriage-and-family-life/ http://postmasculine.com/pornography-can-ruin-your-sex-life Pornography does much more harm than good. It cannot be "medicine".  Yet for a person who may be in a committed relation ship and is looking to try new things, that may act as a tool of education or as an example.As the sources say even on marriage it can make sex good temporarily but then the participants begin to lose intimacy for one another. It tears apart relationships more than heal them. It replaces the spouse for someone better on a tv screen.  but it is also for the single person (guy?) who is without a means to relieve their sexual frustration without going out and actually harming someone.Again. The guy will begin to lust for girls that fot what he can look up on his computer screen. On the computer a guy can look up anything. This means he can find what he cannot obtain or see in his surroundings. It does more harm than good which again is not an act of medicine.
Debate: Is porn harmful?
Side: No, it heals and gives life

Porn is not medicine. Porn does more harm than good. Medicine is supposed to be good.LOL I meant it figuratively. I didn't want to start arguing in favor of porn being good for you, so I won't but I hold my ground that it's not definitely bad for you.Pornography does much more harm than good. It cannot be "medicine".On studies. Not everyone is affected the same way by it, not everyone takes it negatively like the people in the studies they use to explain how bad porn is. Porn does not kill you like harmful tobacco. Porn can not, in the wrong hands, wound you like gun or sword. Porn is nothing more than an exploration of human sexuality than can be taken in anyway you want to.I'll give slightly, in saying that porn can be harmful to the psyche of young men who have never had any experience with sex, but I do not believe that just because some people can't handle it that it's dangerous.Babies can't handle pencils yet we don't call them dangerous, we simply say it's dangerous for the baby to have one. It's harmful for inexperience people to watch porn.