Debate: Creationism vs. Evolutionism
Side: evolutionism

Sound? You call that sound? A document telling me something is not sound evidence, my friend, it is very much lacking in evidence.What would you like? For me to do a report in front of you, this is peer reviewed material. How exactly do you obtain your sound evidence, I mean think about it, you posted a document to bolster your side, I did the same, the difference being that I disputed your post and you just said mine was crap.You’re asking me to type up a whole study that is a complete mess of papers in a bout three different ring binders and which one is not even in my house? That I don’t have time for.How would I know that your in depth study was actually scraps of paper thrown in various locations around your life, honestly? Making life better for whom? And how does a study with no evidence make ones life more complete? This I fail to understand as would any other rational human being.You obviously don't know what you are talking about. Molecular biologists and biochemists are creating new and life saving medicines, curing cancers and aids, you know that kind of thing, a lot of what is understood about these ideas, ones that actually works is derived from information taken from evolutionary biology. Yet again you mention a study with no evidence, to what are you refering.So is the bible yet it’s the best selling book. Outdated? No such thing except from when it comes to food.The bible was originally sold to a captive market and is being distributed ad nauseum to the poor and there is also the Gideons placing it in every hotel room in the world.The bible does not even mention a dinosaur, you'd think creatures like that living beside them would have been given at least a nod.As far as outdated information is concerned, I'm sure you'll have to agree that the world being flat is outdated information, or the zodiac.Wrong, he gives an example such as “even if the world was 60 million years old…” (which he knows it isn’t), you read it wrong. He doesn’t believe the world to be anywhere near that amount of years oldWhich is also a point to go against him, radiometric dating is seriously accurate, and It ages our planet to a time way further back than even 60 million.Ahh, another single man who ‘witnessed’ “evolution in action”. These men – so selfish of them to hog the labs like that and not let anyone else in to see their amazing horseshit findings! Perhaps because there is nothing happening…Honestly you jump to too many conclusion, John Endler's study was not done in a lab, it was done in the wild first and the results are there and indisputable, one can not claim to have evidence in the scientific community and then keep it to yourself and get recognition for it.Who’s figures? My guy or your guy?Your "guy" obviously.Goody – my favourite part. Firstly, of course you cannot dispute it all, you barely even mentioned it.It would take forever and I don't think it would do any good to try and fit it all into a post on here, I mentioned a few parts simply because I thought it would keep the debate moving.Doesn’t it strike you as rather odd that no man in your street or my street or even any one on my fucking island has ever witnessed “evolution in action” before? What do you want to see? fish turning into Rabbis? It does not strike me as odd, what would strike me as odd would be people actually seeing it in their street, evolution needs a massive timescale to come to the point it's at and if you are willing to shun all evidence and believe one book which states that the world is less than ten thousand years old then you'll never understand it.I've given more examples as well by the way, I've posted links, I've mentioned the Lenski experiments, how do you explain these things. What about vestigial organs, such as a snake's pelvis, a human nicitating membrane, a whale's hind legs.God created the world, God created man, God did not create a big hairy ape that evolved into an upright human being who could read, write and pat the monkeys on the head that failed to ‘evolve into human beings’. So, how about you telling me some reasons why not to believe in creationism.If God was the originator then why leave so much evidence in support of evolution around, why leave dinosaur fossils in the earth, why give animals vestigial organs, why leave fossils of early man and other species in the genus homo stuck in the ground, why make a human and an ape so closely related, why make microbes change under environmental pressure to become stronger.This is only just evolutionary evidence to not believe in creationism, there is physics as well (radiometric dating). I also see not one single piece of evidence that proves it (creationism), or the existence of a God, an entity in which a belief is necessary to start believing creationism. Furthermore creationism to explain complexity is a weak argument, a being powerful enough to create the universe would be far more complex than it, and would itself require explanation. Seeing gaps and plugging God as the answer solves nothing and impedes progress, until God can be proved he should be kept out of science.Thirdly, let’s cut the sarcasm and between the lines insults – they’re gay and seriously, I will quit responding if you continue to act like a prick.Actually can you stop being a hypocrite, your language is foul and the manner in which you approach the debate is petulant while accusing me of not debating like a grown up, this here and the further tirade of negativity that you finish your last post with is why I said I found your style intriguing.Your words do remain in context as I've explained already I only copy over enough of your point to keep carrying the idea, to copy all would lead to a huge post where half of it would be that which you've already typed. Perhaps you have potential but we will never know.Who's we? Do you honestly believe that your opinion means anything?I don’t debate with people who insult me and debates that are a drag. Debate closed.What are you looking for, polite conversation? The heat of the argument is what makes it fun. and just to finish, you throw insult and fail to see it, then get insulted when the shit is returned, a bit hypocritical me thinks.