Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

Note: I didn't respond to everything you said only because my responses would be a to of the same stuff repeated over and over. By saying that I claimed the standard is good. Try reading what you quote.The reason it appeared that you claimed the standard was good was because when I raised my argument about what I thought was good, you disputed it by saying that it was not the standard. The length of the argument is worthless if the premise it is based on is faulty.Except my central argument wasn't based on fallacy. I made one example that was poor, which only renders that example 'worthless.' My central argument is unaffected.I explained how you were wrong.Which I countered, leading you to attack the one example I made that you see as hypocrisy, which I then explained in detail. You are claiming that I think that as long as everyone does it I am claiming it is good.See my first response. False, the word poor is about what is standard.As I pointed out in a previous argument (which you did not respond to) the word poor also means "worse than is desirable." Dealing with the standard is one meaning, but it is not the only. False, you argued what you think is substandard.I never stated that my central argument was the standard. Merely that I think more than someone's views should be the criteria for electing a president. Just move on dude. You apologized, move on.What I did not apologize for was hypocrisy, which my argument was not. It was a bad response, but not hypocrisy. The way you said it was hypocritical. Deal with it and move on. Reword your hypocritical statement, stop calling it not hypocritical.Ok, let's move on. Why did you dispute my original claim? You agree that my argument is what it should be, which is the topic of the debate. So do you still stand by your counters of my argument?If you can't tell why I countered your argument then you can't read and telling you again won't help.Well, it seems that you countered my original argument for reasons not relating to the debate at hand. I said: you should support someone for more than just the fact that they share some of your beliefs. You responded by saying: That is the only criteria anyone ever uses. That was your full response to my claim. This implies that you see the fact what I suggested is not the standard, it is invalid, and should not be used. However, you now argue that just because something is the standard it isn't necessarily good. So how does your original argument stand? That is why I am confused.False. You think I have because you twisted my words.Ok, so correct me instead of simply accusing me. Reaffirm your position in a different way. I think I made it pretty clear why I think that you have moved away from your original argument. You made one argument and I said it was flawed. What do you want from me? Create fake arguments that you didn't make and point out how they are flawed? Oh, you do like that approach. I was referring to a full sentence by the way.Well a) throughout a debate, new arguments can be presented. b) You said my argument was flawed, I disagree. So we debate it. It's how a debate works. I would like to know why you think my argument is flawed, because it seems to me that we are in agreement. Your original response of why my original response is flawed contradicts with the arguments you are making now. You claimed my argument was flawed because the opposite of what I say should be is "That is the only criteria anyone ever uses." Now, you argue that just because something is the standard doesn't mean it's good. Which is it? If you still find flaw in my original argument, what is it?Your word choice is incorrect.Um… ok… how so? You can't just say "you're wrong" in a debate or "you made one bad argument." That doesn't invalidate any points being made.Which word are you discussing? "Poor"? As I explained above, poor does not necessarily imply 'below what is standard,' it can imply 'below what is desirable.' Or is this a pun? I did use the word 'incorrect.' So I guess my word choice is incorrect.