azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

If "to doubt" is truly opposite of "to trust" than it should be impossible to trust someone while having some doubt.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

But it is impossible to trust someone if you doubt them... You may still follow them, but trust isn't there.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Impossible to FULLY trust them, I'll grant. What you propose however, does not allow for levels of trust. The implication that once there is some doubt, that this destroys all trust, is misleading.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

That's exactly how i see it. I just realized they won't see it that way, so i decided to dispute in an hypothetical sense.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Without knowing what trsut is, you wouldn't be able to comprehend, untruthfulness. Theres a balance, every word has it's opposing word. They exist off one another, So (IMO) distrust is a form of trust.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Going by that (flawed) logic...Solids are forms of liquids.Hard is a form of soft.Light is a form of darkness.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

I said (word,) not tangible things such as solids or liquids. "good," and "evil," etc. You can't touch trust nor can you touch doubt.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

light isn't tangible and neither is darkness.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

darkness is a form of light, there is always visibility. Meaning there is always light. Just a lighter, shade doesn't really create the perception of actual darkness.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

So light is a form of darkness? It is just a brighter shade of darkness?
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Yes, the perception of darkness is just a dimmer form of light.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

So (un)distrust is trust? Whaaaaaaat ?(universe implodes)  It's even in the word. "dis" or "un"= not, therefore distrust=not trust. Doubt is a form of distrust and not a form trust.The definition of doubt specifically implies that it is not trust, which means it can't be trust of any form.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

What point do you even get at? Even if i were to agree or disagree, what point are you even getting at.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

How is doubt a form of trust if doubt is distrust ? distrust and trust are opposites.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

... He didn't say is it TRUST, distrust is a form of trust. Form: a type or variety of something.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

It's still not even a form of trust.It's not trust . e.eIt can't be a form of something if it's not even that something.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

You're an awful debater. You dispute to disagree, not to understand. Do you even know what you're saying when you type.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Nah I understand and then disagree . How in the world is "not trust" a form of trust ?
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

It's like the opposite of trust... Doubt= unsure ofTrust=sure of
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

The opposite of doubting is suspecting, not trusting. Thanks for playing :)
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Prove it? You can't just make a claim and act as if it's true. lol
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

You mean like the argument you made immediately prior to that? Turnabout is fair play my friend.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

You still never proved that doubt is a form/function of trust. You only proved that sometimes they can be used at the same time.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

You can only be sure that I didn't prove it to everybody. Some found my arguments convincing, and some found yours convincing. As I think you are aware, proof consists merely of what is convincing.I look at it like doubt is a form/fuction of trust. I posted this debate looking for challenges to the way I think about it. That I haven't persuaded you to look at it differently is clear, but you haven't changed my mind either. I can see your arguments as being convincing to many, but they don't convince me.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

K. Was just making sure that you knew that neither of us won.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

It's like the opposite of trust...Is it truly? Isn't to doubt, to place a certain level of trust in a hunch that X might not be the case?Doubt= unsure ofor alternatively....doubt=trusting proposition X less and Y moreTrust=sure ofIf "trust = sure of" this might not account very well for varying levels of trust.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Nope. There is no belief involved.There is just not enough evidence to put any amount of trust in X.X just floats around, remains intangible and isn't given any attention until it can be tangibly grasped.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Put on your "nuanced thought" cap .
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

What are you trying to say? That doubt is just a low level of trust?That's ludicrous. You should go and get the proper credentials so that you can alter the meaning of the word.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

What are you trying to say? That doubt is just a low level of trust?That's ludicrous.No, it's more like a shifting of trust toward an alternate position. I think you may have convinced me that an improvement to the OP would be "Doubt is a function of trust"You should go and get the proper credentials so that you can alter the meaning of the word.Nah, I'd rather just have a conversation with those in charge, and exert my influence that way.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

For some reason, sadly; people are caught up in connotation of definitive words... They don't get into any denotations what so ever.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Yeeeah, that's the problem here . lol
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

No, it's more like a shifting of trust toward an alternate position.Give me an example.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Sure, but first, will you admit that one can doubt the veracity of proposition X, to a certain degree, and still hold X as more likely to be true than proposition Y?
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

I need in example first to determine whether I can agree with that or not.No X or Y, but an actual situation.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

I ask you where the bag of weed is. You tell me that it's in the kitchen. After a minute of searching the kitchen I begin to have some doubt that the bag is in the kitchen, but I keep looking because despite having doubt, I'm still inclined to believe it's in the kitchen somewhere that I haven't looked.As I begin to doubt that the bag is in the kitchen, I am redirecting my trust. I am not ceasing to trust, I am only changing the way that I trust. Like all trust, doubt is but another form of self trust.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

That's improbable! No one in their right mind would lose their weed!Ok so you are somewhat uncertain that it's in the kitchen, but you believe it could be somewhere in the kitchen still. So you are doubting X but putting trust in Y.Doubt still isn't a form of trust.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Tell me what you doubt, and I can easily describe this doubt in terms of what you trust.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

I doubt that I will live to 200.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

You trust that you will die before age 200 .
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

If I trusted that I will die before 200, then it's because I am sure that i will die before 200.If I doubt that I will live to 200, then it's because I am not sure whether I will die before 200 or not.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

So you believe all trust is 100% trust ?
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

You can have 50% trust in someone100% trust that they can do half of these jobs and then doubt they can do the other half.There is no trust of any form founded in the doubts, but if they can prove that they can do the other half then you trust that they can do it.If they prove that they can't do it, then you now trust that they can't do it. You are not doubting that they can do it, but you now trust that they can't do it.The feeling of doubt is no longer there.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

I don't think of trust as the complete absence of doubt. It's just trusting one proposition more than another.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

If you say so.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Well then go up-vote arguments on the "agree" side so someone else will get sucked into this ridiculous debate with me :)
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Doubt= unsure ofTrust=sure ofCorrectionDoubt = SOMEWHAT unsure ofTrust = SOMEWHAT sure offurther,That which we are only somewhat SURE of....is also.......That which we are only somewhat UNSURE of
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Don't know where you get your definitions from.  You pull them out of your ass apparently.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Man that really stings. You just made me look so stupid, I'm probably going to be too ashamed to post on CreateDebate anymore. I bow before your word meaning expertise.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Oh I am sorry!(not really) I did not mean to offend! (you're not offended)>.>The words doubt and trust do not imply "somewhat". You arbitrarily added the "somewhat"
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

It appears that you think doubt implies a COMPLETE LACK of trust. Either it does, or I am right.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Yes it does .
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Perhaps To SOME people, who view these concepts in an overly absolutist sense.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Well they are opposites so it can't be a form of it. It's just logic .
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

There is absolutely no difference in meaning between statements "a" and "b".a) I trust herb) I doubt she is lyingwith true opposites you would not be able to craft such statements without prefacing one of the terms with a negation. Try it!c). Bob turned off the lightTry as you may, you will not create a statement synonymous with statement "c" that uses the word "on" unless you specifically negate the term.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

a) I trust herb) I doubt she is lying.Those two are completely different sir."b" translates to, "I am not sure she is lying." If "a" and "b" were not opposite then "b" would mean "I am sure she isn't lying.", but they are opposite.I am seeing Trust and Doubt as antonyms in a thesaurus, so I am going with that.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Those two are completely different sir.If created a debate asking if the two statements meant the same thing, I assure you that the "yes" side would win."b" translates to, "I am not sure she is lying."I am curious what translation CreateDebate users would think more appropriateIf "a" and "b" were not opposite then "b" would mean "I am sure she isn't lying.", but they are opposite.I am seeing Trust and Doubt as antonyms in a thesaurus, so I am going with that.I haven't persuaded you in the slightest from what I can tell, so indulge me if you will, so I can try to expose the flaw in the popular logic. A simple question.Do you believe that it's possible to trust without being absolutely sure?
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Do you believe that it's possible to trust without being absolutely sure?Trust in what and without being absolutely sure of what?You can trust and doubt at the same time, but the two have to remain separate.They contradict each other."I trust you, but I still doubt you." an easy contradiction to see.Doubt it not trust in any way shape or form.Just like a Solid can never be a liquid in any way shape or form.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

You cannot turn a light on and off at the same time, because on and off are truly opposite. You CAN trust and doubt at the same time because trust and doubt are not truly opposite. Doubt is trust in the opposite direction if you will.Damn you are hard to persuade, and you make convincing arguments.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Doubt is trust in the opposite direction if you will.The on on the switch is in the opposite of the off on the switch.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

You neglected to address the part where I establish that on and off are true opposites (because a switch cannot be both off and on)YETDoubt and trust are not truly opposite (Because even you admit that it is possible to trust and doubt at the same time)Dare ya to actually address this instead of being dodgy.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Oh I was going to, but forgot. Here is my rebuttal.If a solid can be inside a liquid, then solid is not truly an opposite of a liquid.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

A solid is not the opposite of a liquid any more than a gas is. Try again
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Electricity can be both a good thing and a bad thing.Good and bad are opposites.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Good and bad. These are truly opposite. Electricity cannot be both good and bad , at the same time and in the same respect.Right now, I trust that I will live until tomorrow morning. At the same time I have some (not very strong) doubts about that.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

I trust that I will live until tomorrow morning.=X At the same time I have some (not very strong) doubts about that.=YThey are not existing on the same object. The opposite is another side wholly.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

I trust that.....I will live until tomorrow morningI "weakly" doubt that.......I will live until tomorrow morningI simultaneously trust AND doubt that I will live until tomorrow morning. I am trusting and doubting at the same time about whether I'll live until tomorrow morning. This covers the "same time and same respect" clause of the law of non-contradiction.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

I simultaneously trust AND doubt that I will live until tomorrow morning.By saying that, it wholly becomes doubt.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Were there no doubt, we wouldn't even say we trusted, we would say we know.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Even if doubt and trust are not opposites, then that still does not make doubt a form of trust.Trust is the absence of doubt. Trust means you feel like you are certain. Doubt means you feel like you are uncertain. If you say you trust something, but still say you have some doubts, then you really still doubt out. It doesn't matter what you say or how you say it."Knowing", is the absence of trust and doubt.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Even if doubt and trust are not opposites, then that still does not make doubt a form of trust.Granted. What makes doubt a form of trust is that doubt is trust in an opposing proposition.Trust is the absence of doubt. Trust means you feel like you are certain. Doubt means you feel like you are uncertain.If it's impossible to trust without being ABSOLUTELY certain, then my argument falls apart. If it is possible to be EVEN SLIGHTLY doubtful regarding a proposition that you generally trust, than your argument falls apart.Do you agree with this? (I trust that you won't answer this directly with a yes or no...in other words, I doubt you will)"Logical flaws are hard to expose, without the aid of yeses and nos" ~atypican"Knowing", is the absence of trust and doubt.Careful what you admit sir, it looks like you agree here. Remember, simply saying I have a point is not an option. :)
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

So in conclusion; doubt and trust are the same thing.And the different use of the words are pointless.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

And hold on! When did I ever agree that trust and doubt can coexist on the same object?
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Agree

Right after (tellingly) not answering the following question (below in bold) with a yes or no.Do you believe that it's possible to trust without being absolutely sure?You have yet to agree further than admitting they can be done at the same time. I am still working on convincing you that one can both doubt and trust the exact same proposition.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

My personal adviser is very mistrustful of your theory.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

While you could say that doubt is a form of trust, in that you're trusting your own instincts and experience over the thing you doubt....That's really just playing with semantics. You could argue that cold is a form of heat (as the term cold just indicates a temperature below a somewhat arbitrary threshold), and be somewhat correct in a technical sense, but it's still wrong insofar as understanding of heat is concerned- while it is scientifically a measure of kinetic energy at the molecular level, when people talk about hot and cold they're talking about relative to the norm, specific measurements of energy be damned.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Trust, as you say, might be positive (trust) or negative (untrust). Can it apply to believing? Believing is same as unbelieving to a certain extent. It seems like a funny word play to me. Fairly interesting how the words' meanings make the statement more important without the importance of context. Imagine how many words are out there, but the argue around here is dedicated directly to those two. But the context can't be ignored since words are meant to make sense and send a message to the receiver in a conversation. it's easy as bad is bad and good is good. Only one decision is left to decide, what is bad and good. And that decision is different to all people. e.g. Say out loud a bad joke to someone involving a dirty joke. And watch how many different people will react. - Now what I just said is my opinion and . So the two words trust and untrust signify the same definition only one negatively and the other positively. So with context these words get applied into action and describe certain obvious things, or unobvious if you're in a doubt. Being in between them, the decision between true and false, bad and good,believe and disbelieve. Just being unsure. English dictionary was created, and began to develop and still develops. And the words have a certain meaning. Choose your vocabulary and stick with it. But keep in mind that most people will speak how they were thought. So just stick with the language. - And I might be wrong. Explain why I could be? Cheers.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

I kind of don't get this. If you have doubt that someone can do something you aren't exactly trusting them completely. Since you doubt them. I'll give an example invade this doesn't make sense :) If I was asked to do something an the person who asked didnt have a doubt in their mind that I could do it it's showing trust but if they asked me to do it and they still had doubts its bit showing a lot of trust, if that makes sense? :/
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Is Ice a form of liquid? yes it is the solid form of water and water is a liquid.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

Doubt is still not a form of trust.Just because they can be used at the same does not mean that it's a form of it.
Debate: Doubt is a form of trust
Side: Disagree

when you doubt a person then how can you trust him??
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: yes

I believe in one God so I guess my answer should be no with Gods plural.I have no proof of the existence of this one true God but I know I feel it all around me and see it in my children and try to reflect it in my actions. I do not go to church on Sunday and I do not think its necessary to worship God in building a with others.
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: yes

You do have proof my friend. Let your faith be reinforced in the proof of his existence that is his work: The magical universe!
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

What evidence do you have that the universe was created by anything sentient?
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: yes

Ok, go to the debate.Click on "Show all replies".Press Ctrl-FIn the "Find" box, type in "evidence"..Now, you won't find any hard evidence, but there is plenty of other evidence that God does as well as doesn't exist. None of which can be proven. Have fun.
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

See the long white bar at the top of your screen, 'click' your 'arrow' on that and type: www.google.comNow press enter.Okay heres the fun part, type: burden of proofPress enter againHave a bit of a readHave fun.
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

That the way to do it!... If you don't understand something, or cannot accept that something is as yet still unknown...simplify!! Dumb it down! A big man in the sky with a beard waved a magic wand and ping..universe is ready! having a god of the gaps is great isn't it!
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

I believe in God also but how do you not have any proof when there is a bible? how do you see it in your children and feel it around you but you can't take an hour out of your week to go to church and learn more. Get some information from churches and other believers and realize that if you know God is out there than why not worship him?? Why not do what he asks of us? Why not do something good when he's the one whos given you true life?!
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: yes

Ok, so the bible is evidence of god? Well, I'm making a new book, and this is what it says:"THE BIBLE II, ONLINE EDITION: jonny 23 created the universe, life, and everything 20 minutes ago. This includes all of our thoughts and memories, so we do not realize that the universe was created 20 minutes ago. jonny 23 is, in fact, God. Now you, child of jonny 23, bow down in prayer, donate to me, build a place of worship, and blow up everyone who doesn't believe." Now I have evidence. You cannot prove me wrong.
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

Please O' mighty Jonny 23, give us all your account number so that we can deposit holy cash into your bank account.I challenge all ye doubters to prove that Jonny 23 isn't god!...pffffft!
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

How does the bible prove god? it's only a book written by humans.
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: yes

true true but the quran is from god scientists embrace docs, islam
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: yes

I don't have proof that everyone else doesn't already have! And I don't believe I need to go to a building to worship! I can do that when ever and wear ever I choose, as for doing what he asks of us....I do!
Debate: DO GODS EXIST??
Side: No

'Faith' is what you have in things that don't exist