Debate: If evolution is taught in schools shouldn't creationism?
Side: Not on my watch!

When I see your comments I laugh, with reason.That is overconfidence. When you learn to spot it, you'll be closer to achieving enlightenment.Science (and Religion)was designed to help the world, and yet Science made up for the people it saved by bombing up the whole damn place (Pearl Harbor,9/11, etc),Actually none of those. Science was developed as a means of determining fact, evaluating claims, and understanding nature.Religion was developed as part of culture, but also took on the role of subjugating the poor and enabling a minority to live in supreme luxury.On the other hand, politics, specifically war and skirmishing factions, are what gave us Pearl Harbor. Religion was what made the hijackers eager to take their own lives for a political cause.while Religion destroyed people(Crusades,Witch Hunts), because people used religion as their justification to do evil.That's right.The difference between the two is, Those who used science for evil did it on their own hatred,greed and lust for power.This is correct as well, though it's better to say that they used politics and skirmishes for those ends.Those who did evil with religion in mind, did it AGAINST the guidelines of their specific Holy Book ( Pretty much the same as The scientific mishaps). Bible, Quran etc.Skeptic's Annotated QuranSkeptic's Annotated BibleAs is fairly evident, both holy books make allowances for violent behaviour and it can be argued that they encourage those behaviours.Science ( AND Religion, which is made up of ethics in the first place, Those who conveniently interpret strangely, simply to justify their wrongs are a whole other matter) without ethics is fruitless and not beneficial in any way whatsoeverScience was never an ethical or moral tool. It has an ethos which underpins the process of testing claims and forming models, but it never claims to have derived a scientific set of morals or ethics, and its conclusions are presented in an amoral way, because it is in the business of fact, not opinion.And that is what destroys the world. Power without moral or ethical guidelines.Which is why we have government, for example. Ethics is their role. Morality informs ethics, but after popular sentiment, and it is highly individual.In the 1930's who would have thought that promiscuity of one person,or many people depending on the case, could cause the death of millions of people? (Aids ,Herpes etc) and all goes back to what dreaded Religion was saying from the beginning.It causes death because major religions encourage practices which facilitate the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. The Catholic Church, for example, has a long history of spreading misinformation about condoms (saying that they have holes in them, cause impotence, or do not prevent HIV), and Protestants across America spread similar misinformation in addition to fighting sex education in schools (which would make children better informed of how to use condoms and contraceptives to prevent disease). This is just a small part of it too, as the religious have a history of being against vaccinations, because they prevent diseases which they maintain are part of god's punishment against sin.The edicts about sex before marriage exist because thousands of years ago women were property. It had nothing to do with disease, but rather offering a virgin to a prospective husband. Now it is just a means for religions to divide people on meaningless issues for political reasons.THOU SHALL NOT KILL, STEAL, LIE, SLEEP WITH ANYONE BUT YOUR WIFE.The first commandment, "Thou shall not have any other god But Me' is yet to show its repercussions when disobeyed.You should look at DeuteronomyAlso, on Women