azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
Side: yes

I am in concurrence with this statement. So many people (through my research of the topic) have been using that as the solution. What provider are you suggesting? Do you have a suggestion for a provider or is this just a blanket statement as to back up the dislike of Wal-Mart. If people were able to give a plausible and realistic example or plan on ways to improve or change the current state of Wal-Mart, their employees and what they are doing for or not doing for America, then maybe those who do not feel strongly against Wal-Mart will listen to your possible solutions. Until that point, there is really no point in complaining about what they do or do not do. People complain about Wal-Marts treatment of employees, effects on the economy, environmental impact, the list could go on for forever; what do those people that devote their time and money to complain about Wal-Mart really do about the issues they feel so passionately about? Absolutely nothing (besides complain); why don't they take that time and money and do something a little more constructive, like actually help those they claim to care about. I do respect those individuals who try to get their ideas out there and speak out about what they do and don't believe in, but I don't think its right for them to constantly give criticisms to a business because it is doing what businesses are supposed to do: maximize profits for shareholders (by making great products or prices) and if they are feeling generous (through CSR) then they should do things for employees, their local area and all of the rest. Wal-Mart has done a great job with the shareholder profits and low prices and has even done things such as helping hurricane victims and the local communities they reside in. For these reasons, I believe that Wal-Mart (for the time being) is a fine provider for America; if people come up with a solution and better provider, I think many Americans would love to hear about it.
Debate: Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
Side: yes

AGREE! Also if people are so against large corporations, then why do they support them daily? Where do they think that many non profit groups receive HUGE amount of capital in the way of CORPORATE DONATIONS? I believe that claiming all large corps are bad is just an easy way out for individuals who are uneducated on the subject, but want to think they had a part in the conversation..Just like political debates!
Debate: Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
Side: No

Yes, we may be better off with some one else as our provider, but that company or big box industrial retailer would (most likely) be the same as Wal-Mart. Perhaps their values, philosophies and the premises on which the company is based off from may differ from Wal-Mart, but that company (if successful) would do most of the same things that Wal-Mart has done. They would open several chains offering minimum wage jobs to those individuals in areas willing to accept that type of pay. They would cause smaller less competitive companies to close their doors. Also, they would look for less expensive industrial producers in other countries to produce their goods so that they can lower the price for consumers as much as possible. Because that is what dominating corporations and retailers do. They look to save money where ever possible in order to lower their prices, which in turn (they hope) will increase their revenue and profits. That is the purpose of a business: beat the competition, lower costs of goods sold, increase revenue, and increase/keep consumer retention. Based on these things, I would say that Wal-Mart is doing a pretty good job.
Debate: Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
Side: No

I agree if another store was to become the dominant retailer and had better philosophies on how to treat employees and quality of products they would eventually become similar to Wal-Mart. The company would soon seek new ways to contain costs and they would most likely cut employee wages first. They would then source there merchandise from a cheaper supplier and most likely get it from overseas. Because of this they would eventually be viewed just as Wal-Mart now is. Increasing profits is the goal of every company so you can't single out Wal-Mart because every retailer would be like them if they could.
Debate: Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
Side: yes

Unfortunately, Wal-Mart employs over two million people. Try telling that to them.
Debate: Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
Side: No

I do not support any corporation that draws from dead peasant insurance on its deceased employee's. Just my opinion.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: liquids are wet

wet –adjective  1. moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid: wet hands. 2. in a liquid form or state: wet paint. Water is a liquid, therefore water is wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

1. moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid: wet hands.Water can't be moistened, covered, or soaked with water or other liquid because it's already a liquid.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

You state that water can't be "moistened, covered, or soaked with water or other liquid" because it's already a liquid. 1. Water is constantly covered with itself, given the puddle contains more than one atom of H2O.2. Are you saying there is an intrinsic property of liquids that prevents them from being any of those things, simply because they are liquids?3. The fact that you outright stated that water is a liquid devalues your argument, as the second definition provided states that wet can mean "in a liquid...state"
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

Water feels 'wet' because of its heat dissipation property. If you were to lie completely still in a tub of water until the temperature stabilized, you would not feel 'wet' at all. In essence, 'wet' is heat leaving your body.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

There's more to it than that. If you enter water that is at a higher temperature than your body (such as a Jacuzzi® hot tub at 104 degrees Fahrenheit), it still feels wet. It's not just temperature.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

I am very confused if you meant that water is or isn't wet. I am also confused on what you said that deputed his reply
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

So, my thinking is that wet is an adjective, thus making it more applicable than only to humans, so you might be right about water not being wet, but I believe that your reasoning is wrong
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

Disingenuous postulation, because the definition example is clearly stating a solid (paint) that is affected by water, not that the paint itself is purely a liquid all on its own. If water is in a liquid form already, and is introduced to more water, it doesn't "wet" the water, it simply adds volume. It is a term solely used for a solid with an added liquid that adheres to it. If the water doesn't adhere, then the two are merely sitting side by side.Mercury can be in liquid form and it doesn't make things wet, and it not wet itself. Being wet is only when water has changed the property of the object. It is simply a relative term.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

You say water cannot wet water, so water isn't wet. I would like to point out the fact that objects that are completely saturated with water do not change their saturation level when introduced to more water, simply because they cannot possibly hold any more water than they already do. The fact that water does not wet water does not mean water isn't wet; it simply means that it cannot add any more water to the pre-existing volume of it than already exists in that space, and thus it simply becomes a larger puddle of water.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

liquids in general are not wet. things that come in contact with liquids become wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

If you pour water onto water then you are conceding the waters have both wet each other.Ergo, water itself is wet as each particle (molecule of H2O) is wetting each other one.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

I don't believe this is a valid argument against water being wet; you're saying water isn't wet because water isn't wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

Elements of Water:Hydrogen - 2Oxygen - 1Both elements are a gass. Gasses, while in their gas form, cannot be wet. In order for there to be water, Hydrogen and Oxygen must be binded through and electrical charge while in their gas form. Thus water is not wet, because it is made up of two gasses that cannot be wet to make water itself. Water is the factor in which items become wet, but since water is water, and in order to be "wet" you must be covered in water, and an item cannot be covered in its own, water is not wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: It's not dry is it

I cannot believe I just read that. It made me laugh a lot, thanks. Though I don't think this is a serious debate, your answer appears to belie my belief. An excellent example of getting it nearly right, and yet oh-so wrong.An atom of Hydrogen on its own is not a gas. An atom of Oxygen on its own is not a gas. A molecule of H20 is not, on its own, a liquid. (look up what makes a gas and a liquid for why)When you have more than one atom of hydrogen (same for oxygen) at room temperature it forms a gas. When you mix molecules of H20 together at room temperature they form a liquid. When you mix hydrogen gas with oxygen gas, they do not form a liquid, they form a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen gases. However, when hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms are bonded together (as you so nearly got it) to form molecules they are no longer two gases, but a single mixture of H20 molecules, or water.Where did you study? Your teacher needs a slap.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: liquids are wet

I'm absolutely stunned that you are trying to argue that water is not a liquid. At standard temperature and pressure, water is a liquid; that is a fact! Arguing this will only make you look very very silly.It doesn't matter whether hydrogen and oxygen are in gas form at standard temperature and pressure. When they form to make water (firstly becoming H2O molecules, then combining to form water), they become a liquid.Here is the standard definition of wet:wet Audio Help /wɛt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[wet] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, wet·ter, wet·test, noun, verb, wet or wet·ted, wet·ting.–adjective1. moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid: wet hands.2. in a liquid form or state: wet paint.3. characterized by the presence or use of water or other liquid.4. moistened or dampened with rain; rainy: Wet streets make driving hazardous.5. allowing or favoring the sale of alcoholic beverages: a wet town.6. characterized by frequent rain, mist, etc.: the wet season.7. laden with a comparatively high percent of moisture or vapor, esp. water vapor: There was a wet breeze from the west.8. Informal.a. intoxicated.b. marked by drinking: a wet night.9. using water or done under or in water, as certain chemical, mining, and manufacturing processes. Look closely at number 2. ...in a liquid form or state: wet paint. Last time I checked (although, you might beg to differ with every person in the world who has half a brain), water is a liquid.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

You skipped over 1. moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid: wet hands. Last I looked, you can't moisten, cover, or soak water with water for obvious reasons
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Actually, you can soak water with water. if you can soak your skin or a towel with water, why can't you soak water with itself? We often do not think of this because it does not seem natural. Just because water is a liquid, does not mean it cannot be soaked with itself. And what obvious reasons are you talking about?!?!? There are no obvious reasons because you can soak water with water. What we have here is a person just trying to make them self look smart.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: liquids are wet

Of course it is. you get soaked in it every time you tkae a shower.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

Water is wet because each particle of water is is surrounded by water therefore the particle of water in question is wet. Therefore water is wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

a "particle" cannot be wet itself so you just contradicted your self...
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

Not all water is wet, not all water is surrounded by water. Water molecules have been isolated before. Here is a source that talks all about isolating water molecules: https://www.nature.com/articles/am2011196  I cannot say that sheep are brown, because there are many different colors and species of sheep. It's the same with water, not all water is wet, so you cannot say that water is wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

http://www.why-is-the-sky-blue.tv/why-is-water-wet.htm
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

please say your thoughts instead of yours...........................
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Chuck Norris

If Chuck Norris wants the water to get wet, the water will get wet...
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Chuck Norris

No. You are wrong, because when Chuck Norris goes swimming, he doesn't get wet, the water gets Chuck Norris. So in saying such an argument, I rest my case involving Chuck Norris. ^_^
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

Water is suppose to be wet regardless of whether is it hot, warm or cold.It will still be wet because it is a liquid.Ice is still wet isn't it ?
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: liquids are wet

Ice is not wet. Ice is a solid, not liquid. Presumably, the 'wetness' you're referencing is the H2O that has warmed up to its liquid state.This is similar to how steam is not wet. You will get condensation once the steam moves from a gas to a liquid state, but the gaseous state of H2O is not 'wet'.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

ice can be wet because a solid can be covered in water if melted, but not water in its liquid/gaseous state
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

2. in a liquid form or state: wet paint. If anyone says no then they obviously can't read.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

It is a liquid and it feels wet so it should count as being wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

As stated in the definition of wet, 2. in a liquid form or state. - saying that waster in its liquid form is wet.However, in the other definition: 1. moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid.- This states that "wet" is a feeling that need to involve two or more physical matters, therefore water cannot be wet on its own unless accompanied by another object; such as a hand.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

so me and my boy.. friend?, were having a talk abut if water is wet or not.. he doesnt think so. but i mean water is a liquid there for its not dry.. and you throw water on something the object becomes wet. so how could water be dry and sill get another object wet.. it cant?!! lol. there for water being a liquid, is wet! even though its never been dry:] taylor!!. HAHAHA.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: It's not dry is it

Yes it is because if it was not it would be dry and water is not dry
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

Water is neither wet or dry. No one ever said everything had to be one or the other.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

it is wet it is not dry if it waw not it would not be water
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

WATER IS NOT WET THATS LIKE SAY AIR INST DRY IF A FISH IS DRY IN WATER IS IT FUCKING DRY GET OUT OF HERE THAT'S RETARDED NO FISH IS DRY
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

pour or sprinkle water over (a plant or an area of ground), typically in order to encourage plant growth."I went out to water the geraniums"synonyms: sprinkle, moisten, dampen, wet, spray, splash; More That's a definition and some synonyms of WaterWATER=WET
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

The definition of wet is covered in, or saturated with another object that is water or another liquid, so if 1 water molecule is surrounded by 1 or more water molecules then it is covered in a liquid and there for wet, BUT there is an exception to this; if the water molecule is by itself, it is not soaked in another object that is liquid, and there for not wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

If this is true, that all water is not wet, then you are conterdicting your arguement. I cannot say that sheep are brown because not all sheep are brown. That would be incorrect. If you say that the species human have white skin that would be incorrect because not all humans have white skin, it varies. In the same way with water, I cannot say that water is wet because not all water is wet, it varies.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

water isnt wet molecules inside it is wet..........................................................................................
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

this is an old and by now boring argument.wetness is defined as being in contact with water, or covered soaked or doused in water. the reason anything covered in water is defined as 'wet' is because WATER IS WET things that can get wet can later become dry. water cannot become dry, BECAUSE IT IS WET
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

how can water be in contact of itself, water is it self an cannot be separate if its together
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

Wet is wet and water if it is in a liquid form is wet, but the real question is how many water molecules does it take for water to feel wet to us?
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

Yes water is wet it is a liquid.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: yes

Can you wet something with something that is not wet ?If not how if water wet
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Yes, water is wet and i can prove this by dipping my clothes in bucket full of water...Think on this....
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

so how does this prove that water itself is wet, your saying that water makes you wet(which is obvious)
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

A single water molecule, besides being microscopic, wouldn't be wet. For something to be saturated, it is "imbued thoroughly; or charged thoroughly or completely". Which means Mickey the water molecule isn't wet by himself. Also, in chemistry saturation means having no free valence electrons. So, if Mickey bonded with at least two other water molecules he would be imbued thoroughly and have no free valence electrons. For the record, a single water molecule itself isn't wet but water is irrefutably wet.this argument is debate is irrelevant but it really made me think for once.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

"Wetting is the ability of a liquid to maintain contact with a solid surface"Wetness is determined by the strength of the intermolecular forces of a liquid and a solid that are in contact. Wetness is a property of all liquids, just like viscosity. Since "water" is a liquid, it has the property of wetness, and thus is wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

water is obviously wet bc e=mcsquared. This is not a dumb joke. mkay?
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Wet is a property meaning a substance is dissolved in a liquid. Dissolved means covered/surrounded by liquid. H20 molecules are surrounded by other H20 molecules so water is wet. Also water makes things wet meaning wetness is a property of water meaning water is wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

Why does a molecule of water have to be surrounded by other molecules of water? Will the universe explode if we suspend a single molecule of water in a vacuum? Sounds to me as if water itself isn't wet unless it's unless you put more water on it.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Water is wet, because it has had the same percevability since the 1800's. With that the simple definition of water is defined as substance in a liquid state.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: No

but its the 2017 and MANY things have been corrected. also please give the place where you saw that "Water is wet, because it has had the same percevability since the 1800's"
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

water is wet!!!!!when you get splashed with water you think oh i'm wet.\or water moloecules that touch and move and burst.water is not drywater is not dampwater is not dry
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Water Is Wet Because Reasons......................................................................
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Water would be wet. It makes things wet right? so wouldn't it be like the key factor of wetness? it could be both but I believe that water is wet,
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

water is wet because when u put your finger in water and u pull it out it is wet something go to be wet for something to be wet so I guess when u take a shower and u get out I guess u not wet water is wet and that is what I got to say....
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

So everyone is saying. "Water isn't wet it just makes things wet". How can it make things wet without being wet.People also say that wet is just a description of water. If wet describes water than water is wet. The color of the apple logo is gray. That's a description of the apple logo. So your saying descriptions aren't ever true. Is fire cold now. Ohhh burrrrr looks like Suzy overcooked her casarol again.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Water is wet. Fire is hot. Black people are criminals. White people are Racist. Mexicans are both. And Asians are gay. Indians are all. But you don't see me saying black people deserve rights or white people deserve jail time because it is just simply not true. Water is wet!!! and it is that simple of a comparison.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

A wet towel gets you wet, therefor wet things get you wet.Water gets you wet, therefor water is wet.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Because water is a liquid and one of the main properties of liquids are that they are wet, water is also wet. Another reason is also because water is a compound meaning that the stuff that creates it (hydrogen and oxygen) lose their properties when thy are mixed together.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

It all depends on what we're talking about to me. If it's a puddle with more than one water molecule, then it would be wet, as the water is covering itself. However, I would not believe that a single molecule of water is wet, as it does not cover itself
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Wetness is our description of what we feel when we put our hand in water. Saying water is wet is like saying that wood is hard or fire is hot.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Water is wet, this is the dumbest argument ever, lets search up the definition of wet. According to google:noun1.liquid that makes something damp.Believe it or not, water is a liquid that makes something damp. Lets go to the merriam webster,a : consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)Believe it or not, water does consist of water. Let's go to Dictionary.com - The world’s favorite online dictionary! (http://dictionary.com)2.in a liquid form or state:wet paint.Do I gotta keep going? Let's keep going anyways. Let's go to oxford dictionary.noun Liquid that makes something damp.So, water IS wet, I don't know why this is trending, this is the dumbest thing i've ever heard. Can you wet water? No, because water is already wet. You can’t wet a shirt you just went to the pool with because its already wet. So fucking stupid.
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is water is wet, is is
Debate: Is water wet?
Side: Yes

Water is wet: Water molecules are surrounding other water molecules to make water so doesn't that mean water (H2O) is wet because it is surrounded by its self? And you need a liquid to make something wet. H2O molecules coming in contact with another molecule or object, therefore just answered my own question. Water is wet because you need H2O molecules to make. something wet and H2O molecules surrounding themselves this way making water wet. Try making something wet without a liquid.