Debate: Can agnostics be Christian?
Side: Yes.

How old are you? I'm in my 40's and generally don't get that kind of pedantic response from my peers.I love how quoting you is somehow obsessing over minor details. If those were criticizing "agnostic Christians" then you clearly weren't paying attention to anything I was saying and therefore were utterly disconnected from the conversation.But just for your sake, I'll show you the explicit progression:You said: "In my opinion, this seems to be a growing trend of atheists to attempt to garner a bit more credibility, by attaching themselves to the "Christian" label. We fundies have special logic-deciphering glasses that allow us to see through all this bs though."I responded with: "You lost all credibility when you claimed that the atheists who are espousing support for Christ's teachings (a misguided trend, in my opinion) are doing so "to attempt to garner a bit more credibility"."You responded with: "Care to expand a bit? Why did I lose "all credibility" in your eyes? Or is this just an emotional outburst, where you simply regurgitated one of the last words I used? Why else do you think Atheists would claim to support the anointed One?"I responded with: "It's the classical "assume the worst of others" path." etc etc etcI could go on but it should be blatantly obvious.You're the one who's had to add the following derailment (not I): "how someone can be an atheist or agnostic whilst agreeing with parts of what Christ said"So responding directly to your initial comment is a derailment? You don't seem to be big on conversations then.I was pointing out to you (but it seems to have missed it's target) the folly of that notion. There logically cannot be agnostic/atheistic Christians. It's a logical contradiction. Like a YEC Darwinian evolutionist. Except it isn't, and I argued just that. You didn't even argue against it, you just keep repeating a claim. It is possible as I have demonstrated to be Agnostic and Christian, though I have agreed multiple times that one can not be Atheist and Christian, though they can be Atheist whilst agreeing with parts of what Jesus said (which is what started this conversation thread).Also you're very mistaken on the definition of the word "agnostic". You seem to think it means someone who's just not sure of the truth.Gnosis: knowledge of spiritual mysteries. Gnosticism and Agnosticism exist in conjunction with different religions as a characteristic regarding the nature of one's belief. I have already explained all of this to you, so saying "well these words are synonyms" doesn't change that. Agnosticism deals with knowledge, Atheism deals with belief. In that sense one can be an Agnostic Atheist, a Gnostic Atheist, an Agnostic Christian, a Gnostic Christian, etc.However, we believers in Christ say we know Him. It's a personal relationship with God Himself. Some say that. Others believe in God and have an uncertain belief regarding the Bible and Jesus. It really is very common.Being a believer and non-believer in Christ is not logical.It is also not something that has been discussed. Again, one can agree with some of the things he said without believing in his divinity. It really isn't complicated. You keep making up this idea that if they agree with anything he said, they therefore believe he is divine. That is not logical, not rational, and not founded in reality.This is the point I've been arguing and will continue to argue: the logical fallacy of being an agnostic Christian.No you haven't, you've been repeatedly claiming it is a logical fallacy without addressing any of the points I made regarding the nature of Agnosticism within Christianity.