Debate: Satanism vs Christianity
Side: Christianity

ok to be frank this is not a very good attempt to prove me wrong so I sent out a message to a friend who studies this field and he said as follows test results can be viewed cen tech j vol 10 p335-343 ...published research on this one he did in 1996 this proves that this test is only 25% percent accurate on rock not bone as bone doesn't have the argon build up needed to fudge the test in the first place and the lowest date possible on a test of this nature is 200000 to 270000 years old so he asked me to find recent formed rock in lava field tests that have been dated this way to calibrate accurancy in the labs procedures ..... now keep in mind you can literally see the minute this becomes rock for the first time ....and the average was ....270000 to 3.7 million years for a day old rock.....so as I said argon gas you say ....I viewed and contacted the folks in picture you listed it has been significantly altered by computer generation program...they full on admit this when pressed or researched in basic search engine settings ....so you failed twice now ...tectonic plate theory ...this is from the people who are so far behind predicting earthquakes in real time that it is just a fuckin joke .....find one time these people accurately predicted an earth quake...and please don't reference hoolywood or green screen as you have in past presentations ...ive been able to find really good pics of Godzilla on the net are those real too.....anyhow back to station tectonic plate theory is excepted because it cannot be proven or disproven its like the cat in the box both alive and dead....so you think Everest rose from the ocean floor ...what ocean in the hymilas are you referring cause if Everest was under water in the sea the rest of the world would be too ...now lets talk self evident ice age....how my friend is water tested to see if it was ever frozen......oh leet me help you there is to date NO TEST to see if water was frozen so what says the ice age was ice ...isn't ice frozen water....if it were snow it would be snow age not ice age.....and since non of us were there we can safely assume it was some form of WATER......and as I told you in private in the animal kingdom there is a 2% genetic difference in primates and humans and your thowing out 85% accurate digs as ok to fudge the rest into full size and color replicas ...of what art class....2% makes a new species ..what then can 15% do ....you have nothing your argument false on material that has been defeated in court and class room for many years.....your type of people are so damaging you do just enough homework to sound smart...but poison the knowledge well and as for the red sea I know a archiologist who applied for a dive permit and was refused and was told why by locals who live there and saw this with there own eyes....bottom line you say science and I say how .....if you say big bang I will refer you to the losers at cern that have failed evrey attempt to replicate this and I will say what caused bang and what created the particles and if you say the bang srang forth the bang and the particles im going to puke in your face.....because that makes you the stupidest person in the room ....doesn't matter what room or who is in it you are the dumbest.....if you believe a bang from nowhere created particles that created life as complex as this ...and again for something to be real it must be able to be replicated ....your dating systems even accourding to those who use it know its flawed I presented proof ...you yourself said large percentages of digs are seriously short of intact bone sets....now let me ask if I bury a dog and its pupps in a flood the bones are mixed and you have no clue what this animal was its dead and never been seen ....you will try to put all those bones together making a fuckin mess out of the dog ...this is archiology...ask an honest one ....