azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

yes i think texting really dose effect me because when i write papers for school. I type like i am texting which is really bad. It really sucks because i have go over it a number of times just to fix ti and then i still miss some because in my eyes its right. That is a really bad habit of mines. Even when I send emails to my teacher of even my mom i do it also. But when I talk like to my friends i might say OMG or LOL. but nothing really to crazy but my friend are worse then me. But yes i think that texting really do effect people epically teens.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

I think it does effect texting on some ways because by doing other things. that is because you can expres your self more easy. sometimes people dontknow what you are talking about when you wirte incomplete words.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

The texting "lingo" is for some reason a lot different from regular English. People choose to shorten words into merely letters all jumbled together that shouldn't make any sense but for some odd reason, everyone does. I personally spell everything out when texting, commenting and messaging because I don't want to form a habit of back spelling. I wish that people could differenciate between real life and text, but I guess some just can't.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

Unfortunately, using shorthand does have an adverse effect on the level of communication someone is capable of. Teenagers resort to using slang in text messages, and ultimately retraining their brain to speak in shorthand. Using words such as wut in place of what, and abbreviations like idk for I don't know are bad habits to become comfortable with. After a while, you will begin to think, speak and write in a similar manner. Its inappropriate and detrimental to a teenagers reading and writing skills.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

yea it does effect the way you write cause when you text you don’t really write out the whole word when you send thing to people you just use abbreviations so you can write less cause you get so use to it that you for get what your doing it and it makes it hard for you to change back writing proper.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

Yes the texting have some bad effects on people and communication. Texting is also an other form of Newspeak language, introduced by Orwell. By texting we are minimizing the words, using short forms, and abbreviations. By doing this the students will not be prepared for their professional life. They will not know how to write good resumes, or essays. I think texting should be use only in emergencies.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Though I am not effected by the texting "lingo" in my essays or speech I know plenty of students that forget to write out simple words like you, are and today and instead write "u", "r", and "2day" on important essays.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

Yes they do because allot of times when people type a essay or any kind of passage, they will contain " u, lol, omg"' etc. Writing in a texting form is incorrect and it contains useless words that means nothing except a peace of nonsense that has been written by an individual mind.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

Yes, I believe that texting does have a bad effect orally and on writing. For, example when you text all the time you get use to texting short and choppy phrases, so people use stuff like “r” for “are”, “u” for “you”, “ttyl” for “ talk to you later”, “lol” “laughing out loud” or “omg” “oh my gosh”. So people tend to get lazy and get use to doing this stuff, and when it comes time to writing an English paper your so use to writing in text form and you might accidentally slip in a text phrase and not even notice and get a bad grade on your paper.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

Yeah. Sometimes when I'm text messaging, and talking at the same time to somebody in real life, I get words from each mixed up. Example: If I'm saying "That's what I said" in a text message, and "No, I'd rather not" in real life, then it may come out in real life like "No, I'd that's not said." Or in the text message "That's rather I not." You know? Not a great thing to have happen to you.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

"Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other areas?"I would say "Yes" that texting does effects a person's ability to communicate in other areas. My reason is because there are times that parents will not give the freedom of owning a computer to their child until they are in college. The parent might not allow a computer, but a cell phone for emergency use. When the child texts other people, he/she will not learn appropriate ways to speak in a conversation "face-to-face". This will make the person look pathetic to other people in public. With texting, the next generation will look or become dumb as a consequence. So if child asks why I did not give texting on his/her cell phone, then my reason for it is so that my child can actually learn and achieve appropriate civility in our world's society.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

No because I text all of the time and the essays I turn into my teachers are usually A’s. I feel that text-messages may help you in the long run for classes because when you are taking notes it helps your write faster by teaching you how to shorten words. I don’t think there is any type of bad communication because any kind of communication makes your brain process and think. Texts also help with I hand coordination.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Texting doesn't affect my communication in any way. I always try to use proper grammar and spelling, even when I am texting. I think most people who text know(or should know) that grammar and spelling are more important in some situations than others. If students know they are being graded on grammar they will use better grammar. However, I did not grow up with texting and online communications. Many kids that are growing up with that will probably have lazy grammar because they are used to those types of communications.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I believe that texting does not effect one’s ability to communicate to others. The only time it would effect one’s ability is when they don’t understand that “text-language” should only be used in texting. When writing an essay I never write “u” instead of “you.” When people do this it’s only because they’re being lazy, not because texting effects their writing skills. Blame it on your lazy-careless ways not texting.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Texting does not have an affect when trying to communicate a different way. What I mean by that is if I were to write an essay for an English class, the way that I text won't affect my writing and vocabulary. Most young adolescents my age write in slang terms and they are really short with their messages. However, I believe that texting does not affect the way one communicates in other areas if that person text's the way he or she would if they were writing an essay.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

No I don’t think it does because usually when I text, I text in proper sentences. sometimes. lol It is different when your talking to somebody and texting somebody. Usually if you talking to a person you can get to the point faster without having to explain yourself. And if you are texting somebody you can’t just say what you have to say because the person is going to be confused, on why you said that statement. Most people know when to talk or text in the right way, sort of like an instinct.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

I believe that certain people may have a harder time communicating because of texting, but I also believe it is there fault that they are that way. I have unlimited text because my scrawny 3000 texts a month wasn't working for me. I don't put txt, ur, u, h/o... those short text words are not put into my essays, conversations, and debates by personal choice. I believe people use texting as an outlet because they think it's an excuse to type or talk bad. It's really not. Those people are lazy. That may be mean, but it's the truth. Texting has no say in how you type or talk, it's your own choice as to how you follow through. Our generation in the business world is known as the ones who are too innvolved in technology. But it's by choice that these people do so! People need to stop ruining our generations outlook.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Text messaging does not have an affect on how we are able to communicate orally. The whole shortening of words is just a way to reply fast and get it over whit. Plus that way you won’t be hold up whit 20 text messages in your in box. The less full grammar you use in text messaging the faster you can reply to all text messages.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I don't think texting has an adverse effect on one's ability to communicate in other arenas. Yes, one does get used to the short forms of writing words but that doesn't necessarily mean they communicate in such a manner. As we get older our vocabulary increases and our ability to put together words is much greater than when we were younger. Everybody has the ability to change the way they speak whenever they feel is necessary. A person who is a CEO of a company could have an amazing vocabulary and can speak many different languages can be a master at texting. Communication is all dependent on the person.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Texting doesn't really have any bad effects on my communicating abilities. I am usually in a different state of mind when texting than when I am trying to have real conversation with some one or when I im trying to write an actual essay. Texting for the most part is just a recreation type of activity with a peer where we are just chatting about little things that dont require indepth answers. When I text I usually just give the basic idea about what I want to say without alot of thought going into my words, but in any formal occasion where I am actually talking about something that actually requieres some sort of indepth response I go into a different mindset. I never have any problems keeping my informal mindset and my formal mindsets seperate.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I feel texting does not have an effect on one's ability to communicate in other arenas such as communicating orally and writing formally because when I text I text for the most part proper. I suppose people who speak informally or in slang while texting might cause a bit of blockage to their writing but if one is to speak correctly and grammatically then they should be fine will having to communicate in other arenas.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I know for a fact that it doesn't because people should be smart enough to distinguish the two types of situations where you either text or write. It doesn't take a genius to figure out when and when not to use abbreviations like "lol" or "lmao".But it does take a true phone junkie to keep using them. I understand why people use abbreviations, though. It makes it much easier to communicate with their fellow peers, cuts button pressing by half, and we're just that lazy to not spell out the whole word.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I believe that once you know somthing you cant forget it. In saying that, I know you might slip up a couple of times but im pretty sure you know the difference in when you're allowed to use text talk, or the most prudish time to use the regular communications.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Texting all the time actually helps you with your I hand coordination. Well actually it depends on what cellphone you have. Like if you have the Palm Centro, sidekick, ENV2, etc. They all have mini baby keyboards that you can play with, but if you have those brick phones and have three letters in each number it might cause a little issue.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I don't believe that it does because most people can control how they write. Yes, most people shorten their words and sentences in a text message but when it comes to writing a formal paper there is proof reading, rewriting, and editing to prevent the spelling and grammar errors. When it comes to talking to others, if you start using "lol" and "omg" as an actual word, your a complete moron. Everyone knows "lol" and "omg" are not words, so don't use them in your speak as if they are.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I don't suppose so.It depends how you communicate; because if you don't know your literature then texting could affects ones writing or communication skills. But texting is like writing a short meaning to someone in a matter of seconds; which makes it fun. Knowing your literature wouldn't affect the way you communicate or your writing.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I believed that texting does not affect one's ability to comminucate to others. It is just a way to express yourself in a different form of text. For example, the book 1984 involves newspeak. Texting and Newspeak have many things that bond them together. The way society speaks will not change as long it is forced on them to change.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I don't believe that texting should impair the way you write a school essay or hold a conversation orally with someone if you are somewhat intelligent. I text all the time and more times than not, I use proper grammar and punctuation in my text messages. I believe that humans are habitual creatures and if the practice something the wrong way then they learn it that way. So if they do use slang in their text messages then they will most likely use it in an essay unless they rarely do it. It all depends on what they do more frequently, if you use slang more frequently then you are more likely to use it in an essay than if you used grammar properly.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I would say yes,because when you text you you abbreviate thing, then when you are writing papers in english class you begain to abbreviate.And that messes up yoour grade, because you didnt have the correct spelling which is a part of english class.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I don't think texting has any effect what so ever on your oral communication unless you are trying to talk to someone while you are texting. Then it does have a strong effect on it. It is difficult to be thinking two different conversations at the same time. As far as grammar goes, it might have an effect on some people who tend to shorten words and sentences when they text. Then when they talk aloud to others or write an essay they tend to use the slang and the wrong grammar used in text messages. I don't have that problem. The people who I text are constantly laughing at me because I write my texts in complete sentences. So, I don't have that problem. I think thats about the only effect it has, and that isn't a big one. Most teens in America are smart enough to know that the way they text in not appropriate grammar, so, when the time comes to write an essay they still know the proper language to use.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I agree with you but I don't. Most people don't use full sentences when texting, I do but I didn't know anyone else did until I read your answer.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

Well I'm kind of on both sides on this one but mostly on the no end. I feel like most people are lazy and don't want to write out the full word. When writing an essay I'm pretty sure nobody wants to put "lol" or "omg" on their essay.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: yes

Just because they put "lol" or "omg" doesn't mean they did it on purpose. All it means is that they are too used to text talk, and wrote it down subcontiously.
Debate: Does texting have adverse effects on one's ability to communicate in other arena
Side: No

I don't think texting has any effect on the way people talk to each other. But people who shorten words and sentences when they text might have a problem when they are writing an essay or any written assignment. people who substitute "u" for the word you might also make that mistake when writing an essay. But most people will read over what they write and will catch that mistake before sending in their assignment. i think it effects peoples writing, but not to a degree in which it's a big problem.
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

Legally speaking, no. Ethically speaking, yes. I think we all need to take a step back and look at it this way; think about if your parents aborted you. It sounds fine and dandy to abort a baby, it avoids struggle and confrontation. However, that baby is a human, regardless if it is in the mother or not. It is alive and thriving from the moment of conception. It is growing and will potentially be born as a full size baby human. That "fetus" is a human, and we all believe in human rights; so why not for babies? If a mother gets an abortion the day before the child is due, it is considered a fetus, but if that baby has come out of the womb it is a baby? How can a day make that much difference? Months? I can understand abortion and its benefits to the parent, but if that child speak it would say "I don't want to die." The conclusion is that from the moment of conception, that "Fetus" is a human, and they should have rights. They should have the right to be protected, to be taken care of, and to be given a chance to live. One thing I have always known, from my time as a child to my adulthood, is that in this world there is not single factor that can make someone's rights more important than mine; no matter the age, gender, sexual preference, race, or beliefs. We are humans, despite any of those factors, and our rights are important and should be given to the baby since it is a live human.
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

I agree. The unborn are human beings from the point of fertilization onward. :)
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

The fetus does have legal rights. So edit your argument; "legally speaking, yes"
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: No.

think about if your parents aborted you.If my parents aborted me I would not care, as I would not exist. However, that baby is a humanPlease define a human.It is alive and thrivingMmm... like a tumour. and will potentially be born as a full size baby human.Potentially. Sperm also has the potential to become a full size baby human, but it still does not have any rights.If a mother gets an abortion the day before the child is due, it is considered a fetus, but if that baby has come out of the womb it is a baby?I would not even consider a newborn baby a person yet... please refer to my post on the other side of this debate. but if that child speak it would say "I don't want to die."That's just it, it can't. That "child" isn't even aware of it's own existence yet. The conclusion is that from the moment of conception, that "Fetus" is a human, and they should have rights. So far you have just given BS answers as to why a fetus should be considered a person. Seriously, give me a good definition of what is a person and then see if a fetus applies to the definition.
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

The question being asked is really, at what point in the growth of a human baby, does it become a person with human rights. There is much debate about when this actually occurs. ALL of the spectrum of opinion on this question is founded on some arbitrary definition. At conception, when the baby can feel pain, when the baby could survive outside the womb. In truth NO ONE knows when during gestation the magic transformation occurs. Logical conclusion must follow that (If we don't want to kill a human who possesses rights) and (If NO ONE truly knows when a baby becomes a human) then ALL arguments are potentially false.The only certain way then to avoid killing a human during gestation is to NOT kill and unborn human baby.
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

I agree. I feel that we should err on the side of life for the unborn child.
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

I like the way you phrase the first part, but I think one part is a bit too generalized:If we don't want to kill a human who possesses rightsI think we do allow killing people with rights - through the death penalty, in self-defense, etc.If someone is in your house without your consent, you can shoot them.Might the same principles apply to abortion?
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

A fetus is still a human being yet to be born. thus he's got the rights of being a human. because even if the womb is he's humble abode, he's got the physical appearance of human and that means he takes hold on in advance of the basic human right to live.
Debate: Does the fetus have rights?
Side: Yes.

I agree. I believe that the unborn are children too. .