Debate: Does God exist?
Side: No

That does not mean, however, that there is no evidence of God’s existence. If something is taken on faith then by definition there is no evidence.Deep within us is the recognition that there is something beyond this life and someone beyond this world. We can deny this knowledge intellectually, but God’s presence in us and all around us is still obvious. Despite this, the Bible warns that some will still deny God’s existence: “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God’” (Psalm 14:1). Since the vast majority of people throughout history, in all cultures, in all civilizations, and on all continents believe in the existence of some kind of God, there must be something (or someone) causing this belief.It is also deep within us to discriminate against each other based on skin colour, sexual preferences, gender, nationality, the way we look, our friends, ect. A strong intuitive hunch doesn't validate something's existence, or merit.What causes this belief is eons of poor reasoning skills, primitive minds, hucksters who parade lies around expecting gullible people like yourself to buy into it.In addition to the biblical arguments for God’s existence, there are logical arguments. First, there is the ontological argument. The most popular form of the ontological argument uses the concept of God to prove God’s existence. It begins with the definition of God as “a being than which no greater can be conceived.” It is then argued that to exist is greater than to not exist, and therefore the greatest conceivable being must exist. If God did not exist, then God would not be the greatest conceivable being, and that would contradict the very definition of God.Biblical arguments have no basis in fact. It is a mythology, and cannot be evidence.There are no logical arguments that prove god's existence, either, because every single one suffers from a non sequitur or faulty premise. Your ontological argument falls into the category of non sequitur, because you cannot define something into existence, neither can you conceptualise it into existence. Your argument breaks apart from its line of reasoning by defining a concept, god, then creating a subjective premise (or rational premise, depending on context) which belongs to a different type of argument, and ends with a contradiction (god being contradicted) in which it is then assumed that reality must be discarded instead of the definition of god. The major premise doesn't belong with the minor premise and therefore the conclusion doesn't follow.I'll illustrate your error with an example:I define human tissue to have strength greater than that which can be conceived.I add the premise that to be strongest is greater than to be strong.Therefore human tissue must be strongest, because if it wasn't, it would go against its definition.A second argument is the teleological argument. The teleological argument states that since the universe displays such an amazing design, there must have been a divine Designer. For example, if the Earth were significantly closer or farther away from the sun, it would not be capable of supporting much of the life it currently does. If the elements in our atmosphere were even a few percentage points different, nearly every living thing on earth would die. The odds of a single protein molecule forming by chance is 1 in 10243 (that is a 1 followed by 243 zeros). A single cell is comprised of millions of protein molecules.This has a wrong premise and tautology."A made thing has a maker""A designed thing has a designer""A built thing has a builder"You use a premise to justify a conclusion, and befuddle this with faulty premises concerning probability.Evolution for example designs things without being a designer.A third logical argument for God’s existence is called the cosmological argument. Every effect must have a cause. This universe and everything in it is an effect. There must be something that caused everything to come into existence. Ultimately, there must be something “un-caused” in order to cause everything else to come into existence. That “un-caused” cause is God. Self-contradiction. If everything (that's what a universe is, everything, there is no outside to the universe, because that becomes part of it) has a cause because it is an effect, then who or what caused god? Who caused the thing that caused god? And so on.A fourth argument is known as the moral argument. Every culture throughout history has had some form of law. Everyone has a sense of right and wrong. Murder, lying, stealing, and immorality are almost universally rejected. Where did this sense of right and wrong come from if not from a holy God?Morality is subjective with no basis in reality, so how can it be used to justify an objective thing? You may as well use blueness, or hot, or sweet as arguments for god.Despite all of this, the Bible tells us that people will reject the clear and undeniable knowledge of God and believe a lie instead. Romans 1:25 declares, “They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.” The Bible also proclaims that people are without excuse for not believing in God: “For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).Quoting mythology doesn't make an authoritative or convincing argument, it makes you look like a fool.People claim to reject God’s existence because it is “not scientific” or “because there is no proof.” The true reason is that once they admit that there is a God, they also must realize that they are responsible to God and in need of forgiveness from Him (Romans 3:23, 6:23). If God exists, then we are accountable to Him for our actions.We are responsible to ourselves. God is irrelevant. You may as well invoke pixies as being our moral authority.If God does not exist, then we can do whatever we want without having to worry about God judging us. Ah, but what about:Every culture throughout history has had some form of law. Everyone has a sense of right and wrong. Murder, lying, stealing, and immorality are almost universally rejected.That is why many of those who deny the existence of God cling strongly to the theory of naturalistic evolution—it gives them an alternative to believing in a Creator God. God exists and ultimately everyone knows that He exists. The very fact that some attempt so aggressively to disprove His existence is in fact an argument for His existence.You have it backwards. People believe in creationism as a means to reject science and our natural origins. Your denial of science is made most clear in these types of rants of yours, as is your deep down knowledge that there is no god, only a void that you dedicate your life to filling with sophistry that a child can see through.How do we know God exists? To all Christians, we know God exists because we speak to Him every day. We do not audibly hear Him speaking to us, but we sense His presence, we feel His leading, we know His love, we desire His grace.Imaginary friends are cool for children, sad for adults.In the end, God’s existence must be accepted by faith (Hebrews 11:6). Faith in God is not a blind leap into the dark; it is safe step into a well-lit room where the vast majority of people are already standingSelf-contradiction.