azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: It will never happen

Ahhhh....obvioulsy most of these postings have come from Americans themselves....so biast. What war has America ever won?......the civil war?? Are we forgetting Vietnam already? There is no doubt China would win...argue all you want but who stands up to China??? no one! they just roll in and take Tibet....no one said a thing. It would take a major effort by many countrys and even then...i would not hold my breath. They can build a 6 story building in 24 hours. 36 storys in 1 month....plumbing, electrics...everything. Hate to know what they are not telling us. Americans fight for Mc donalds...Chinese would die for their country...big difference.
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: No, almost impossible

yep many people now too thinks that chinese people are ancient ones........haha its a big mistake..china is growing tornado....its slowly raising its fangs.......and also its manpower is awesome.....they can eventually copycat anything in matters of hours or days........usa is in debt with china.....european economy is in crisis.......china is expanding its economy alond africa and southa america and also in whole asian region....in 20-30 yrs....china will eventually overtake us ,,
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: No, almost impossible

The American Revolution, The Spanish-American War, WWI, WWII, The Korean War, in terms of body count Vietnam+ had our liberal government allowed the bombing of Laos and Cambodia (which is where the main bulk force of the NVA were trained, supplied, and recruited from) the war would have been over in the designated time, 6 Months. The Cold War (a political war, not assualt war), The Gulf War, The Iraq War, and if we could bomb Pakistan then the Afghanistan War. America defeated the World's Largest Military Power in 1776, using Native American Guerrilla Tactics, the newly devoloped grooved barrelled Black Powder Rifle, and their dear friend and ally France. America fuck yeah, lick my butt and suck my balls!
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: yes, doable

The USN will have china blockaded in a month and we obviously won more wars than china has, infact for the past 2000 years they have merely been a door matt to the world (japan, mongolia,the Huns, Russia,Vietnam 1979 (Yes even china made the vietnam blunder) litterally every country in Europe 1900's (boxer rebellion opium wars etc etc,) Usa lost wars Vietnam 1975"Americans fight for McDonalds" I love to point out how you hate bias when the quote alone is a mere steryotype, but if you wana be a hypocritcal jack @$$ instead be my guest
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: No, almost impossible

wtf you obviously aren't a person who knows much about chinese history. CHina by the 13th century lead the world in technology by 2 centuries and the size of china was much larger because they had conquered many other nations to get that land. For many years india, korea, mongolia and japan which china discovered had all payed tribute of gold every year for protection. The reason america never loses wars is becasue they always use bombs to blow the area up and then use a few people to pick off the remaining soldiers. Just like in the korean war. The americans bombed chinese fortifications every minute. the chinese used gerualla warfare to win many battles. it's because of the chinese people and soviet weapons that north korea didn't fall. ( i wish north korea fell they don't respect china in anyway now) after 800,000 chinese soldiers died
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: No, almost impossible

Listen to me The USA population is all mixed up with white, black, Chinese, Mexican, Indian, and every other races , in a real war they all probably flee to other country they not American any more , no one want to die for some politician just sit there eat good food and fuck hot chicks . They also want to sit there eat good food fuck hot chick who does want that , who want in the front line a get a bullet, no matter how good you are you still get kill soon or later. But you want to live long at least 70 years old, don't you. So when you die no body going to recognize yours corpse if you was black, white, yellow, etc just a pile of bones.
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: No, almost impossible

China's simply too big. Invading China would require the entirety of Europe for any possibility of a successful campaign, and the cost for such a mission would be too high, both financially and casualty-wise.
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: NO WAR

None cant defeat any one(As no one will wage a war).No wars are going to happen in future.The only biggetst threat to humanity is ISLAMIC terrorism..All countries should jointly curb this venom before it reaches heart and central nervous system.For the past decades CHINA is not involved in this, as it is not affected till now!!! (US ,RUSSIAand INDIA are the biggest victims of that.) It seems CHINA is supporting !!!!
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: It would be simple for the US

._.Don't fall for the fear bullshit. Terrorists can only hurt westernized countries as much as westernized countries let them. And the fear you display here is far more dangerous when spread, than a single human with a bomb strapped to their chest.And despite my disdain for all organized religions "ISLAMIC" terrorism is a loaded term. It is just terrorism using a religion as their scapegoat and using a religion to influence the week and stupid.It should be "INSERT THE RELIGION" terrorism... or just "terrorism". You don't fight it by blaming a large group of people and saying "all the stuff you believe is evil!"That's part of what they want, sow fear, divide and conquer. Genius really.You fight it with education and by showing these poor and dumb through example and acceptance that the Western world is not the bad guy.Guns and fear just inspire more terrorists.
Debate: Can any country defeat China if they went to war against them?
Side: No, almost impossible

Everybody I have a debate going on about the Russian Mafia vs the Khmer Rouge.Noone has posted anything on that yet.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

It's the Catholic version of Christianity because they have the biggest hat. Go find a picture with the Pope in full garb, hat included. It's gigantic! What other theist belief rivals that? So therefore, since the Pope has the biggest hat, the correct answer must be the Catholic version of Christianity.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

That seems as reasonable as any other answer that I have ever received. I think the Catholics have the biggest hats because they want them to look empty after passing them around for tithes, then they can make a 2nd pass without feeling greedy, LOL
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

Lol! That hat of his can hold a lot of dough; maybe enough to put a dent in the legal fees defending itself from charges of pedophilia.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

You've gotta expect them to have tons of the world's most valuable, most obscene pornography hidden down there in the vaults.I'd think they'd just auction off a piece or two of the "good stuff" if they felt their finances were ever in doubt.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

You are obviously unfamiliar with Suleiman the Magnificent.Now look at that hat.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

Actually, I have heard of him, but I was not aware of how big a hat, or what ever that puff ball was on his head. Maybe it's a marshmallow and just maybe he was the original inspiration for smores, just add chocolate and graham crackers. But is his puff ball his own style, or official garb of the Islamic faith?
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

Going through the wikipedia pages for his next half-dozen successors, it looks like they each had their own style but that they each also did maintain a massive headdress. Therefore, Islam wins?
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

I don't know how they do it, but I hear ISIS is a great converter. They just give you the option to trust them, or find out yourself.They must make a strong case then.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

I don't think they really convert anyone. They just get the others of their religion fired up and inspired to join their cause.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

This was a joke. Rofl, I don't think ISIS is Jehova's witnesses or anything.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

I worshipmyself, I ammyownGod."TheCorrectChoice" ismy defi-ni-shawn.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

I would say that is the best choice since it is the only one in which God has influence on your life. At least when things happen in your life, Good or Bad your God can truly be the cause.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

There are philosophical ideas concerning deity that are very vague in nature. "Prime mover" and things of that sort. Often times these propositions refrain from ascribing any significant traits to their theoretical deity. Some Jewish scholars have used this method. It's an almost agnostic approach that doesn't require evidence since God in this case relates to situations that are universally lacking evidence for any given theory. Great unknown's. Religious people won't respond well to your debate topic because, on matters of God, they tend to favor faith over evidence. You are asking for scientific answers on a non-scientific topic.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

You are probably right about the evidence vs faith thing. How do people have such a strong faith with no evidence? That doesn't make much sense.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

We know a lot more now than we used to because of science. Science is what made us believe it was possible to eventually know the things that we don't yet know. For most of human history people lived in a world that was predominantly unknowable. Belief without evidence is almost a requirement for a logical mind that can find no evidence for causes. The realm of science does not extent to things that are actually unknowable. Just because something is not science, doesn't mean it is not useful, or even necessarily wrong. As for evidence; Even scientists fall victim to their own biases which blind them to new evidence and slow scientific progress. How strong is a bias that is formed not around scientific rigor, but religious rigor impressed on a young mind almost from birth.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

Anybody who believes in God and has seen that belief enrich his life has made the right decision. His improved quality of life is proof enough. He needs no more. I say this as a nonbeliever, mind you. But when a belief helps you itbisbthe rightbone for you, whether or not it is actually true. Pascall once posed a famous wager that used this rationale.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

Is the point of your argument that ignorance is bliss? Sometimes. But look at saintnow. He is not content, he does not enjoy life. He fears God, doesn't love him. But he doesn't think his quality of life became worse. Because he is too busy thinking about the afterlife
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

It is sad when people sacrifice their whole life for an after life. Many miss out on so much of the happiness that life can offer. Saint now is always indicating that I will spend eternity in Hell, not because I'm some terrible person, but because I don't believe in his God.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

The best way to go to heaven (or whatever the form of enlightenment is in your religion), if it exists, is to enjoy this world and try to be as positive, friendly, and helpful as possible. Then,even if there is no afterlife, you will have at least spent your time here well, and maybe even made a positive impact on others.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

I can agree 100% with you on that, Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

You don't know who or what you are talking about, jokester.Can you describe "the true God"? If you can't, then you don't know what you are talking about, right?Is "the true God" the only God you want to deny, since false gods are self-denied automatically because they are false gods?What do you know about "the true God"? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you will accept anything as proof of "the true God", not even the fire of Hell if you find yourself burning in it unable to escape or die.......so there is no point in showing Hell to you since you still would not acknowledge "the true God". If seeing Hell is the only way you will acknowledge "the true God", why don't you just wait and see if you acknowledge "the true God" when you get there?
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

If you love God, you will obey Him...and at His right hand is fullness of joy. You speak lies about me in your bitterness, you hate God and your slander toward me is equally hateful.....jokester. Guess who gets the last laugh?God, personified as "Wisdom" says to you:  How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge? Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you. Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh; When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you. Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me: For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD: They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices. For the turning away of the simple shall slay them, and the prosperity of fools shall destroy them. But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

Yo, Jokester, there is no "afterlife". You have life, or you have death, and both are forever. You either have eternal life now and are living forever or you have eternal death now and are dying forever. You can be saved from dying forever in Hell, but I doubt that you will because you insist you do not need to be saved....don't want to be saved, won't believe you can be saved, will you? Nope. Prove me wrong. The jokes on you, and it's really not funny though it is laughable looking at fools parading themselves to be smarter and stronger and better than God.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

"His improved quality of life is proof enough."How can the quality of ones life be proof of any God. Just because someone worships Vishnu, and is experiencing a rich quality of life, that does not mean there is a causal relationship between the quality of his or her life and the existence of his or her God. I am not fond of the way the poster phrased this question, not am I fond of the affirmative and negative statement, but I will play along. As a nonbeliever I will say that "the correct choice" indicates that this God must be the true God. Thus, this means that believers must step forth and prove that their selected God is in fact the truest God in that he exists AND matches the description provided by those that believe in him.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

My apologies for the wording. What I was interested in knowing is what makes people of faith so sure that they are worshiping the correct God(s) in the correct manner. Since most believers are so sure their beliefs are the only correct viewpoint.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

Can you describe "the true God"? If you can't, then you don't know what you are talking about, right?Is "the true God" the only God you want to deny, since false gods are self-denied automatically because they are false gods?What do you know about "the true God"? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you will accept anything as proof of "the true God", not even the fire of Hell if you find yourself burning in it unable to escape or die.......so there is no point in showing Hell to you since you still would not acknowledge "the true God". If seeing Hell is the only way you will acknowledge "the true God", why don't you just wait and see if you acknowledge "the true God" when you get there?
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

There is no way to describe "The True God" because the only true God is found in the imagination of the individual who owns that True God This explains why there are so many different descriptions and beliefs about all of those True Gods. Hence the reason that so many different religions exist and even Christians have over 30,000 different religious denominations for the worship of their deities due to the different ways each individual views their True God. If there really were a "True God" then everyone would have the same view of God since it would be the only one people knew. If there were any evidence of a True God I would have no choice but to acknowledge that God but ALL evidence indicates that there are no supreme creators. Just what we see in our natural world.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

Sure Bob, you know more than God, you already proved that. Enjoy yourself while you can, as long as you can remain convinced that you have the right to exist outside of Hell and are not in Hell.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: No, because there are no Gods

Apparently I know much more than your God, since your God is with you guiding you and yet you were unable to give me any answers about your God to the many questions I asked. Not one answer, just personal remarks that had no relevance to my questions. I have every right to live outside of Hell. Only those who believe in Hell need saving from it. I can see that you haven't taken the time to research the origins of the concept of Hell. The Christian religion adopted it from Greek Mythology. Unlike you I will live outside of Hell for all eternity. You however seem to live life in fear creating your own Hell.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

You know nothing more than the space between your ears, and that is not much, Bib....sorry to be the bringer of bad news. God is bigger than the universe, much bigger, and He would blow your little pea brain if you believe on the resurrection of Jesus Christ and your life would be changed forever.......and you can't handle that Bib, so enjoy your space between your ears while you can.
Debate: Can any religious person show ANY evidence that their God is the Correct choice??
Side: Yes, because

"I will live outside of Hell for all eternity"Can you show me any evidence to support this claim?I answered all of your questions, Bib. You don't like the answers, that's not my problem.Now, please show me evidence that you will live outside of Hell for all eternity. How can you expect me to believe that when you have no evidence to show me?