azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Privitization Poses a Major Threat to Progress?
Side: No...

Well, that's because I can't. Canada eh?Funny, but you still ignored the meat of my argument.Capitalism- is an economic and social system in which the means of production are privately controlled.Canada seems quite capitalist to me. The almost everything is privately owned. And yes, Canada isn't that different from America thanks to our Dear Leader.State education. State health care. State fire departments. State currency. Ect. Thats not capitalism...Here's the thing, and I have researched the facts extensively. A state-owned telecommunications company would need no public finds to succeed whatsoever. It would be funded by charging those whom use the service.1. How will they get the funds to prop up the company in the first place? Taxes! What will be used to bail the state owned company out if it fails? Taxes! 2. The state has the power to regulate and tax the economy at will, which would give them the power to regulate/tax in the company's favor.3. Another problem with this is that it is state owned. The state is the law. The state owns the legal system and courts. The state is the final arbitrator on all issues, including disputes involving itself. You can probably figure out where that is going...And on the Communist Manifesto, I think you should re-consider. I also read Das Capital, and found it dry, though I found the Manifesto much more interesting.I'll take it into consideration.
Debate: Privitization Poses a Major Threat to Progress?
Side: Yes, of course!

Firstly, do come to Canada, you will see that we don't have any choice when held in comparison to the US. It is really surprising. They are talking about bringing in Target and that's a big deal. On the telecommunications company, why would it be any differently funded than a private one? The funds that private telecommunications companies bring in are all from the consumer. In fact, they bring in so much money, they can buy out all competitors, and spend money on sports teams. A state one would be no different. Even better would be a worker controlled telecommunications company where the surplus value could be passed to the workers and customers.
Debate: Privitization Poses a Major Threat to Progress?
Side: No...

This is ridiculous. If a public company operates at a loss the state subsidizes it with taxpayer money. It's not different from the state subsidizing private companies to help cover the costs of wages, goods, etc. The result is the same: big taxes and poor service.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Absolutely!! I would LOVE to go to anywhere in outer space. :)
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

I would love to have my grandchildren on my lap listening to me tell them about my trip to the moon.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

yes for sure i would like to go to the moon and take look and feel the low gravitational force.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Um let me think about that for a minute. Yeeesssssssss! That would be the adventure of a lifetime!
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

If there was some guarantee that there wont be any liberals there, then..., yes. Otherwise I may get in trouble for pushing them out an air-lock without their space suit ;)
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

It will not be a big deal in a few years to come. but being the first to go will be a big deal ofcaurse :)... so i will be glad to go up there if given a chance to be first.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Yes! I would definitely go to the moon if I won a free trip. I think it would be really neat to be able to see outer space with my own eyes instead of just pictures that could have been altered.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

i would love to tell my children that i went to the moon for free and i take pictures and show them and i would tell the wonderful stories and how spectacular it was to see outerspace and the moon.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

[[First off, this isn't a debate, it's a poll]]Yes, on two conditions: -It's nearly 100% guarenteed safe.  -You get a trip back to Earth, within a reasonable amount of time.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

It would be a great oppurtunity to see a different "dimension"(if u could call it that) that's not even on Earth. It's probably gonna be fun. Micheal Jackson. .... :(
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

LOL he said as long as I get a free trip back WAHAHAHA. ANd yes I would go no question about it.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

I would unequivocally go to the moon especially if it was for free. It would be foolish to not go. It is for free.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

That is a once in a life time opportunity. I would take it and, if I die, so be it. I'll have the distinction of dying either on the moon, on my way to the moon, or on my return from the moon.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Yes, I would do it for sure. I hope it comes true.http://www.tnktravelvietnam.comhttp://www.vietnamcustomizedtours.com
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

I am always for new experiences.So it will be like a dream come true.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

why not?!) it is very interesting..) i wanna to see the Moon, although it is dangerous...
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

I think seeing the Earth in the sky would be incredible, and the chance to see another world is one you can't miss.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

That would be a once in a lifetime experience, at least in these modern days. It's one to tell the children and grandchildren and so on.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Ya
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

please dshd dsd ds dsd sd sdsjkdn sds dsd sds dsndns dsd sd sdsjidsn dsd sds dsjidsjds dsdjsjids dsd sdjns
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Even if someone paid me to go, I wouldn't because - as everyone knows - NASA stands for Need Another Seven Astronauts - hahaha!! get it? Anyway, knowing my luck we'll crash into the sun, get abducted by aliens from outer space or accidentally fall out of the rocket, freeze, and then blow up. Even if I survived, it would be another couple of months before I got home again and I wouldn't be surrounded with adoring fans; I would end up looking like a loser who is trying to get some desperate attention. I mean, a few people have gone to the moon now, so it is a case of "been there, done that, got the t-shirt" and so on...
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_Y-4ox28uY
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

If I went to the moon, I'd see a large gray barren hell scape full of craters and small U.S. flags.Whereas if I sold my moon-tickets on Ebay, I'd easily make some serious cash, and I could fly to Afghanistan to get the same experience for a fraction of the cost.So, no, I would not want to go to the moon, but I'd gladly like to win those tickets.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

Hell..., I'll pay for you to go to Afghanistan ;)Nah, I'm just pulling your chain.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

You, my friend, are a genius. I would totally do what you would do if i won that ticket. Sure it'd be cool to go there, but selling it would be even better!
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

NO. I know it's cool in outer space but hell no i wont go. I mean it doesnt looke very hospitable anyway, so i wouldnt go.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

Probably not, especially by myself ! I'm not psychically prepared neither would I be able to survive or maintain myself up there. Especially taking for EVER just to go to the moon. Not worth drinking my recycled peepee.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

I agree, what a long journey..I dont even like waiting for a bus.........and i get cabin fever...........id regret it about 10 minutes after take off ...and probably do myself in.....before i even got there...RECYCLED PEE ?...EWW...i will just stay home thanks.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

The moon ? NO WAY ! Have seen enough images to know that the moon is not a very hospitable place and is not good enough even as an adventure outing. It has no people, no animals, no birds, no trees, no buildings, no air, no water and not even gravity ! I wouldn't even go if someone paid me, leave alone a free trip
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Actually, NASA just found water on the moon. And any mass has gravity, especially the moon.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

NASA's definition of water cannot be taken seriously as they would be looking for spectrographs which reveal the existance of molecules containing two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, in order to decree that there is water..and they dont mean you can drink it, cook in it, or swim in it ! and any mass has gravity ? no, sir ! gravity is a force exerted by the earth on objects around it, including the moon ..
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

Gravity is existent by all matter. The earth, being the largest object within distance to us, pulls us in. As do we all pull it towards ourselves. We simply aren't massive enough to account. The earth and moon and everything is pulling on one another. This is why the moon pulls our oceans tides to and fro.Besides, I would take NASA's word long before others when it comes to the fields of astrological contents.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

probably not..... I like Earth. It's nice and beautiful from down here so why do I need to see it from far away?
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

Really dude? I mean, I understand, but I really can't imagine passing up that opportunity. If it were asking if I'd like to LIVE on the moon, I'd probably say no, of course. But just to go there? I wouldn't pass it up.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

I dunno.... It just seems like a lot of hype. I'm happy on Earth and I have no desire to leave it (unless you count death much much later in life. lol).
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

lol i wont even get on an airplane.................................let alone a rocket to the moon.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

Thanks,,,but no thanks! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

No. The chance of dying on the way is not worth the gain of going to the moon.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: No

WTF! Who want's to go to the moon? Choose out of these four choices:Who the hell wants to: a. get hit by an asteroid. b. see an empty, bumpy wasteland filled with U.S. flags. c. see Micheal Jackson and Ronald McDonald dancing together. d. Be at home safe and sound. I would choose d. dont choose c.(that one was a joke. ;) Doesnt d sound better than all those other choices? it sure does to me. If i got a free trip to go to the moon, i would rather switch tickets with someone else and go to Afghanistan to watch the fun instead.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: NO WAY

Even if someone paid me to go, I wouldn't because - as everyone knows - NASA stands for Need Another Seven Astronauts - hahaha!! get it? Anyway, knowing my luck we'll crash into the sun, get abducted by aliens from outer space or accidentally fall out of the rocket, freeze, and then blow up. Even if I survived, it would be another couple of months before I got home again and I wouldn't be surrounded with adoring fans; I would end up looking like a loser who is trying to get some desperate attention. I mean, a few people have gone to the moon now, so it is a case of "been there, done that, got the t-shirt" and so on...
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: NO WAY

Probably not! because i think at the moon not be happy for me and i don't know that there will be safety for me if i go there.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: no

Its easy, Please come to us for the best wayhttp://www.boookingvietnamtours.comhttp://www.hailongtravel.com
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: yes

How is going to space easy?
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: no

No, i wouldn't. Many times people have tried to visit the moon, only one succeeded.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: no

I like various trips and I have to admit that traveling is my life. For example, before several months I have been at Paris. This city is wonderful and I really recommend for all people to visit it if you have not been there. So if I won a trip to moon, I definitely would go there!
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: no

I'm never going in a spaceship.
Debate: If you won a free trip to the moon, would you go?
Side: no

I would decline because I do not want to wear a space suit and be cold.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

Traveling is much better than reading a book as you can experience things when you travel, although with reading, you are only able to imagine. Media has a strong influence on those who read, as they are more exposed to it. Traveling allows a person to be free, and careless towards superficial things. Einstein once said: "Information is not knowledge, the only source of knowledge is experience." Therefore, reading a book and attaining information through a written source is far less effective than traveling, experiencing, ad being hands-on. Additionally, when we travel the world, we discover new cultures, languages, points of view, and way of living, but reading such things is not as effective or beneficial.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

Hmm, interesting. While I do love a good read, you can never, ever catch the full experience of becoming part of a culture with just pages. You don't get to taste the local cuisine, you don't get to participate in local native dances, and you don't get to hear the history of a people being told by a shaman. Traveling, while it is more expensive, broadens your horizons to different types of people and cultures. Read about the Pyramids, watch the History Channel and every documentary there is on them. But if you just read the book, you'll never be able to say 'Hey, yeah, I went to Egypt and saw Giza, the Pyramids, and the Sphinx!"
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

Well, I think that travelling is much better than reading books. Because, if you just keep reading the books you won't have as much fun as really going and seeing those stuff in real life. Example, you're just going on reading a book which is all about Egypt, and you just go on imaging the stuff. Have you never thought, that your imagination can be wrong. Well if you really go to Egypt and see the Giza, the Pyramids and all the great historic stuff there, you'll have more fun than just reading all those. And also, while reading, you might feel sleepy, but when you are really there an and seeing all those stuff, you'll have the best time, EVER! :-)
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

Traveling is better because then you get a chance to do all these exotic chicks from all over the world ;)
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

I was an exchange student in Romania for a year, and I'm almost completely positive I know more about the country than any book could tell you. When you travel, you experience everything, which stays with you a lot longer than anything you just read in a book.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

It is really good when you interesting in somewhere or in something and you want to learn about it as well. The traveling helps you to understand the world better because as written in old sayings "to see once better than hear a hundred times" it is the same with reading because yes when you read you may feel all determined actions , described feelings but it will be better if you feel and to have a look with your own eyes the same episode in books. As scientists considered that the visual memory is better than imagination of reading. The well-traveled people remember the places better than people who have read about the same place. According to the Harry Lorine who have written the book "Phenomenal memory" emphasize that people remember forever the things which forced them to feel happy, to feel sad or hurt them when they feel it really with their own heart with the helps of visual followings even sounds and see it with their own eyes. Not just to read the episode where describes the love between Romeo and Juliet with passionate details viewers remember the pictures of actors and the place where it had happened because it impacts on them powerfully.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

For learning about the modern day world, your better off traveling and experiencing things in person. A text book has chances of being biased and one sided anyway. If you travel, you have the opportunity to see ecosystem, environments, landmarks, museums, governments, economic situations, ect. first hand, for what they really are. As for history, revert to text books, because we don't have time machines yet.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

i agree with the statement, because traveling around the world is more easily to understand what u will read in the textbooks. people forget most what they read but they wouldn't forget what they saw.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

By traveling around the world you will know much more about the country, its culture, people living in the country, the mentality of the country than just reading books, because you see everything with your own eyes, and impressions and experience remain in your memory of almost for all life.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

I am a slow reader so I don't read much but I do travel a lot and it's opened up a whole new world for me and when I see a place on TV that I've been before I look it up .When I get more information about it ,this increases my knowledge of the world much more than I could ever get from a book.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

My Social Studies Book tells Me that Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb, when Tesla did, it tell me that Alexander Gram Bell invented the telephone, when Antonio Mecci did.Textbooks are sometimes filled with people's opinions on facts.Traveling is more better.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

people forget most what they read or learn But they wouldn't forget what they saw.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

You cannot meet the people and see their daily living conditions without going there.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

I would say that traveling to another country would be more realistic than reading about another country from a book.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

Travelling can expose a person to not only the architecture but also the culture. One doesn't need a lot of money to travel. Yes, you can book 5 star hotels and shop and eat. But that kind of travelling is just "sight seeing", not real travelling and certainly not part of experiencing anything at all.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

Traveling gives you a chance to experience life the way you want to, and so you can learn from the things that you go through. If you keep reading without experiencing you will never grow as a person and develop yourself. That's why traveling will help you turn into a wise and grown person.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

READING A BOOK IS LIKE IS LIKE VIEWING THE WORLD THROUGH A KEYHOLE,IN ORDER TO FULLY EXPERIENCE IT , WE JUST HAVE TO SEE THE WORLD :) HOW DO U THINK OR GREAT ANCESTORS BECAME SO WISE BY JUST TRAVELING?? DO YOU THINK THAT A BABY LEARNT TO SAY 'MOM' BY READING A TEXTBOOK?? BY READING YOU GET KNOWLEDGE BUT BY TRAVELLING YOU GET WISDOM.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

KNOWLEDGE IS REFERRED AS THE ABILITY TO ACQUIRE INFORMATION. BUT WISDOM IS THE ABILITY USE THIS ACQUIRED INFORMATION IN A JUDICIOUS WAY. READING A BOOK SURROUNDED BY THE FOUR WALLS OF YOUR ROOM DOES NOT MAKE YOU WISE. TO BECOME WISE YOU HAVE TO TRAVEL TO SEE AND OBSERVE THE NATURE
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

I think I would always side with experience being the greater way to understand something than simply reading. Don't get me wrong, with reading you can learn some understanding of a culture or person but to actually speak to them, to immerse yourself in a culture, brings about the greater understanding.
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: TRAVELLING IS better then read

First of all, I want you to imagine two people. One of these two people is someone who has stayed at home for the rest of his life and devoted his years to reading books. The other has traveled all his life and dedicated his life to traveling. I mean, one's full of brains, the other's heart, eyes and life. Do you prefer to know that the sun is something bright,dazzling, warm, or is it the warmth left in your skin when you raise your head and close your eyes? Do you prefer to know that the wind is a breeze, or is it the warm wind that struck you in the face on a spring evening? Think about it. and the last thing i want to say is, When a traveler in our country told us about the cold in a town where he was visiting, he said: cats are freezing in the air when they jump from a roof to a roof. You've read this now. if you saw it with your eyes?
Debate: travelling is better then reading textbooks to understand the world
Side: reading from book is better te

1) When you have book you can learn about different countries and culture in just one day , however you can't travel the world and learn different cultures in one day. 2) When you buy a book you use less time , money , and effort .