azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

I don't get it, what is the deal with you and GUNS?If it were against the law, then first there would be warnings and even fines, if still will not correct herself then the child would be taken away.You do realize what you are suggesting is that there would come guys who would simply start pointing their guns at the mother while taking away the child?Guys with guns??? WTF is your deal with guns?If you like guns so much, stfu about them and go get one!If I had called for the use of one all the same then I would have put the word GUN into at least one of my sentences.And I'd suggest you use dictionary.com, it is better than the one you used.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

The deal is that when people like you make off the cuff statements like, "there should be a law" or in your case, "it should be forbidden," they are sanctioning the eventual use of violence against others.The fact that there are intermediary steps between the act and the action of threatening the woman with a gun does not absolve the fact that it WILL be done eventually if she does not comply with what YOU have ordained yourself ruler by forbidding it.You have been made uncomfortable by the fact that I am showing you the truth behind your position. Nobody likes being called a thug, even if that's what they are.Here's how it goes down when she resists your fiat declaration that it should be forbidden:Neighbor complains.She receives warning 1.Neighbor complains again.She receives warning 2 with a $50 fine.She doesn't pay.She receives a summons and $250 fine.She doesn't attend the summons.A social worker is dispatched to her home.She tells the social worker to leave her alone.The social worker demands to see the child.She declines.The social worker makes a call, law enforcement officers are dispatched.The police officer demands she open her door.She refuses.The police officer kicks down the door and points a gun at her.Congratulations Lord Protector, you have saved all the land from the mothers lovingly feeding their children.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

You've been showing the truth behind my position alright - the truth that I am right. In fact, I have not been made uncomfortable by anything. I don't even get where you took that. The only truth that is being shown is your own stupidity.If it were a law... Using drugs is against the law. You know what happens if someone is caught using them and resists? Yeah, that's right. Violence. So thanks, for contradicting yourself.And by the way, smoking is wrong too. Smoking is basically using drugs, it too has negative side effects. Why is that not illegal and drugs are?A person should not remember him/herself breastfeeding, as I said in my first post. You do get that?You do understand that breastfeeding a child over 3 years old is wrong? Therefore, if it exists, it should be made illegal, which basically means it should be forbidden, should not be allowed. Get it?The police officer kicks down the door and points a gun at her. Points a gun at her? Again with the gun... Seriously now! Can't you think of anything else?What they would do is NOT pointing a gun at her, unless she actually tries to kill her child to "prove" something. They would grapple her and put her face down toward the floor, and then safely extract the child... But honestly now, it would never get that far. It is easier to stop breastfeeding the child who is clearly above that age. That is what the mom would do. You want to know why she would stop it? Because the alternative is losing her child. Unless that is exactly what she wants.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

"the truth that I am right" - typical statement from a person without any evidence or logic to support their argument."using drugs is against the law." EXACTLY! What do we get with drugs? People that voluntarily choose to harm their own bodies which they themselves alone are responsible for. What do we get with laws against drugs? Drug cartels, violence, gangs, and the abuse of non-violent innocent people by police. You've provided the best possible evidence that there should not be a law.Smoking is "wrong?" Who made you God? Who appointed you as arbiter for what is right and wrong? For me, smoking is RIGHT and if you try to forcibly restrain me from doing something I choose to do to my own body that has nothing to do with you, I'll excercise my right of self defense and use whatever method of force necessary to get you to leave me alone including lethal methods.Why should a person not remember a time of loving, sharing and being joined with the person that gave them life? I do NOT understand that breastfeeding a child over 3 years old is wrong. You've made an assertion of that, one that is NOT supported by any evidence. Evidence actually shows that people who are physically nurtured by their parents including a large amount of touching grow to be less violent and more intellectually adept. Evidence shows that violence is higher in every society that makes sexuality and other natural biological activities "hidden" or "wrong" in comparison with societies that share and understand the reality of being Human. Therefore, since it's good for the children and good for the society, it should be endorsed, utilized and supported. Get it?Ok, so it's all good that she gets battered and grappled to satisfy your opinions.You believe that it's a good thing to threaten mothers with taking away their children to get them to live their lives the way you want to dictate they do. I wonder how you would feel if Sharia law were to take hold here and they dictated that you must clothe your daughter to satisfy their whim as to what they think you should do. If you oppose Sharia being imposed upon you, then you must be against imposing your whim upon mothers as well. Failure to do so is inconsistency and self-righteousness.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

"the truth that I am right" - typical statement from a person without any evidence or logic to support their argument.You can stop that right now. You haven't given any real evidence or logic yourself either.For me, smoking is RIGHTUsing drugs is wrong and smoking is right? They are both drugs and they are both bad for health. Therefore their use is wrong, from health perspective.Why should a person not remember a time of loving, sharing and being joined with the person that gave them life?Evidence actually shows that people who are physically nurtured by their parents including a large amount of touching grow to be less violent and more intellectually adept. Evidence shows that violence is higher in every society that makes sexuality and other natural biological activities "hidden" or "wrong" in comparison with societies that share and understand the reality of being Human.You do understand that we are talking about breastfeeding here, not ANY other kind of care. The act is right, natural. But... From here three questions.Do you think a person should remember himself/herself clinging to a breast and sucking milk out of it?Do you remember doing it?If not, how would you feel about it if you did remember?If I remembered myself breastfeeding I would try as hard as I could forgetting it and not remembering. It may be a natural act, to a reasonable age, but it is not something a person should remember doing.So a child, 4 or 5 years old, goes to kindergarten, and is breastfeeding. A child 7, 8 years old, goes to second grade, and breastfeeds still. Let's make it extreme, a 12 year old kid who breastfeeds. You think that is NOT wrong?Considering that first memories are recorded from time around 3 years old, therefore that is the utmost time when breastfeeding should be stopped if hadn't before.Who appointed you as arbiter for what is right and wrong?I know very clearly what is right and wrong. And where it comes from and why. Basically, it all comes from the fact that we exist. If you want to know more about that, then begin a new debate.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

Here's some logic for you:When it comes to "right and wrong" or "morality" I must assume that all men and women have equal rights. I cannot dictate their actions or force them to do anything because I cannot be sure that I am right and they are wrong. I can, however react and defend myself or others from people that would use dictates or force for the same reason.I don't give a rats ass if it's bad for my health for me to smoke. It's MY BODY and if I WANT TO DO IT, it's my RIGHT to do it. I do remember suckling and I have no averse feelings about it. Your personal perspective and mine are irrelevant. Neither you, nor I, have the right to force our opinion of right or wrong upon someone else that is not forcing their opinion of right or wrong on anyone else.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

I cannot dictate their actions or force them to do anything because I cannot be sure that I am right and they are wrong.Is law right or wrong? How can they know? How can they force it upon all of us?Who can be sure about what is right and what is wrong? No one?Dictating others actions has always existed, still does, and probably always will. There's negative and positive dictation. Some people are too stupid to know better on their own.I don't give a rats ass if it's bad for my health for me to smoke. It's MY BODY and if I WANT TO DO IT, it's my RIGHT to do it.Fine by me if you don't care about your own health. Just shows that you don't know better.Those who try to make a suicide and are saved while still is possible. Why not respect their decision and let them die?What would all drug users say about the same? As is well known, the use of drugs is against the law. And law is the opinions of those who created it. So, those opinions are forced upon them.Neither you, nor I, have the right to force our opinion of right or wrong upon someone else that is not forcing their opinion of right or wrong on anyone else.So, we have the right to force our opinions on the government?Your personal perspective and mine are irrelevant.Then what is the point of debating?Everything is irrelevant. But...
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

Is law right or wrong? In our existing system, most all of it is wrong.How about this, is the violation of another person's self control wrong? I believe it is. It requires one simple premise, we are equals under the law.How can they know? They obviously don't. They have prevented gay marriage, sent men and women to die and murder, they have kidnapped people for having vegetation in their pockets, they have imprisoned people for printing coins and delivering mail. How can they force it upon all of us? Sheep like you that give them power.Who can be sure about what is right and wrong? Logical premises and the scientific method can prove a lot of right and wrongs.Dictating others actions has always existed, and at some point it included slavery. We realized we were wrong then, we can realize we were wrong again.If someone does wish to commit suicide, yes, I support their right to do so. I would offer alternatives, but interfering makes them my slave.Yes, it is your OPINION being forced upon drug users, and I resent it. If you don't want to use drugs, don't use them.No, we have no right to force our opinions on the government, because the government is nothing more than a group of people. I will not force my opinion on what others will do except to prevent them from forcing their opinion on me or someone else that I am an advocate for.What is the point of debating?Actually, this is an intriguing question. If you believe that your opinion should be forced upon others, why are you debating with me? Why not simply force me to see it your way. You obviously believe in voluntary communication and convincing, why is it that you refuse to use that same methodology when it comes to breastfeeding?
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

Is law right or wrong? In our existing system, most all of it is wrong.That is true.How can they force it upon all of us? Sheep like you that give them power.Sheep like me? When did I say I support them? Never pops to mind.Governments consist mostly of idiots who only care about money and power and thus cause corruption and stagnation and thus lead humanity in the wrong direction.Logical premises and the scientific method can prove a lot of right and wrongs.I work with logical premise, and that also tends to include science.Since a large number of humans are not capable of coming up with good and right solutions themselves, or simply do not care about anything but their own well-being, it is necessary to have a leading factor. But not the current, very stupid kind of leading.It requires one simple premise, we are equals under the law.The current law treats us as sheep, as meat, as we are nothing, as if we were just some tools to be used and discarded when no longer needed.Not one person is equal to another, we all have our differences, but it would still be right to treat others as equals when conducting with them. And still everyone should also be considered at their individual level.Yes, it is your OPINION being forced upon drug users, and I resent it. If you don't want to use drugs, don't use them.Actually, it is fine by me if they use them. It distinguishes the lower ones from the rest. An easy way to get rid of or just separate weak links.I will not force my opinion on what others will do except to prevent them from forcing their opinion on me or someone else that I am an advocate for.Their opinion is forcing their opinion. If you prevent them doing it you are forcing your opinion on them.If you believe that your opinion should be forced upon others, why are you debating with me?Actually, distinguishing the weak links is far better than forcing opinions on them... Keep humanity strong and healthy, both mind and body.Showing people the right way so they would consider it, see it, see the error in themselves, and perhaps correct themselves. How can that be wrong?Why not simply force me to see it your way.You do realize that forcing my way upon you would be getting physical in a bloody way? Would you resist me? I think so.why is it that you refuse to use that same methodology when it comes to breastfeeding?As I have stated and mentioned the reasons. Above the age of 3 breastfeeding is wrong. The sooner children become independent the better for them. Every mentally fit mother should understand it, at least here where I live they seem to. But yes, distinguishing weak links...And I'm not a mother myself, never can be, for wienering reasons...A lot of people are not capable of recognizing right and wrong above their personal "need", therefore they act stupidly and wrongly. If they can't themselves, then someone must show them and hope for correction, or the weak link thing...
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

You state, "a large number of humans are not capable of coming up with good and right solutions themselves, or simply do not care about anything but their own well-being, it is necessary to have a leading factor."I claim that you are one such human. That your self-righteousness and belief of some "angels" that will lead mankind from its own destruction is your lack of respect for other people's freedom to satisfy nothing other than your own well-being. You truly believe that by oppressing others, by forcing your will upon them that you have their best interests at heart, but it's a false claim very much like religious zealots that are out to "save" the rest of us.Considering that you might be wrong just as much as the person who wishes to do x y or z might be wrong, you have no right to force your will upon them.You write, "it would still be right to treat others as equals when conducting with them" yet you do not propose actions that do this. Your proposal treats mothers that wish to breastfeed to the age of 4 or so as lesser people, that need to be taken care of. I suppose that's what you mean when you followed, "And still everyone should also be considered at their individual level."It's nothing more than self righteous aggrandizement. You have no right to act in a way to initiate violence or coercion or threats or fines against others. The word INITIATE is crucial to this statement.You wrote, "Their opinion is forcing their opinion. If you prevent them doing it you are forcing your opinion on them." Preventing someone from forcing their opinion on others is significantly different than initiation of force. Self defense and defense of others is readily justified, aggression is not. You wrote, "Showing people the right way so they would consider it, see it, see the error in themselves, and perhaps correct themselves. How can that be wrong?" It is NOT wrong, and that's exactly my point. You've chosen to debate, to use a non-violent, non-aggressive method to interact with me on this. Why not do the same with women that wish to breastfeed past your preferred age? Isn't that better than "forbidding" it?You wrote, "You do realize that forcing my way upon you would be getting physical in a bloody way? Would you resist me? I think so." yet you do not acknowledge the violence that would inevitably occur with a ban on breastfeeding past the age you prefer.Your recommendation that children never remember suckling to me seems contrived. I am sure that the majority, if not all adults that can recall suckling look back at it with fond memories, with great appreciation for the love they received as children.Calling those that don't see things your way "weak" is one of the first of the dehumanizing tactics that was used to justify many abuses of people throughout history. Please don't repeat the mistake.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

You can claim whatever you want, it does not make it true.I would say the same to you.What fucking "angels" are you talking about?The expectation that government will be run by people that aren't just as fallible as you claim the majority of people are is an expectation that some special exceptional people (Angels) will become politicians.[a lack of respect for others' freedom] cannot be inferred from what I have said. is directly shown when you state, it should be forbidden. equally it shows that you truly believe that you believe it since you wrote it.everyone should be completely free and be able to do whatever they want, no restrictions at all? Even if that means raping, murdering, stealing, scamming, using drugs, smoking, beating up others because they are different, brainwashing children into religious crap, and so forth?No, I clearly indicated that the initiation of force is wrong and it is right to use force to intervene when someone initiates force. It's called the Non-Aggression Principle. So on that list, the acts that are initiation of force are: raping, murdering, stealing, scamming, and beating up others. It does include the same method but if that fails and they do not see the error, stronger methods should be applied.What if you're wrong? You have chosen to authorize others to initiate force against someone that was NOT initiating force against you or anyone else in order to impose your OPINION.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: YES

No, I clearly indicated that the initiation of force is wrong and it is right to use force to intervene when someone initiates force. It's called the Non-Aggression Principle. So on that list, the acts that are initiation of force are: raping, murdering, stealing, scamming, and beating up others.Scamming is not done by force... you talk people into losing things.My views are toward a healthy humanity.So you are saying that it is only wrong if someone initiates force? Basically saying it is okay to use drugs, although they are very unhealthy; that it is okay to brainwash children into "believing" things that do not exist, things that are not real, basically messing up their minds; not to mention smoking that is unhealthy, and should be forbidden. Even if it is detrimental to humanity but is not done by direct force it is okay by your standards?The point is improving humanity, not letting it sink into a hole. That means, since there are wrongs (also the ones not done by direct force), it is necessary to have restrictions. There are wrongs because there are many people stupid enough not know better by themselves.What if you're wrong?If someone does something wrong, is told about it, and does not stop it. You think that person should just be allowed to continue, basically showing everyone else that that wrong is okay to do?I'm not wrong.
Debate: Is there an appropriate age to stop breast feeding?
Side: NO

Fraud is obtaining someone's property without their consent, and therefore theft. Theft is an act of aggression. For example, if person A buys a car from person B with 80k miles on it but the odometer was rolled back to 10k miles on it then person A has had 70k miles of usage that have been stolen from him.Your views are toward what you THINK is a healthy humanity and your vanity makes you think that only you are right.I am not saying that the only things that are "wrong" are those that are the initiation of force. I'm saying that I believe that the use of force against another person is wrong unless that person has consented to the use of that force. That those that use force upon others have indicated that they do not ascribe to the non-use of force and have invited it upon themselves. So, when you come to take away my cigarettes and try to force them from me I will feel no remorse whatsoever in using lethal force upon you because you have indicated that you have no regard for not using force.Let me ask you, do you enjoy sports? Those should be forbidden, they cause unnecessary injuries and even deaths and for what? Entertainment?Do you like TV or Movies? They both waste a TON of resources, while we have children starving in Ethiopia. They are a blight on humanity and we should forbid them.I'm telling you, you're wrong to eat meat, and I'm going to forcibly take your cows and fish and chickens from you.I am not wrong.See how abusive that was? You're equivalent to that.