Debate: Capitalism or Socialism
Side: Socialism

And Socialism would fix this how?I don't advocate socialism, I just use the tag since I don't care about changing my tag to some other one. Whether you are referring to real socialism of the Republican brainwashed socialism, it's irrelevant.I can't really ague with this...Good to know you aren't a complete fool.Yes, we do...Labor Unions wouldn't've come into existence if we had enough of a choice in comparison to the rest of the world.How is that fair?Because the rich don't earn their money in a way proportional to the amount of work they do.The poor are not poor because of the rich...Right, because the rich became rich because they did all of the manual labor of their company by themselves at the expense of nobody's health but their own, thus becoming rich only off their own work, and the poor became poor because they never worked their entire lives and just stood around feeling like working and earning money proportional to their effort isn't worth it in comparison to the wonderful world of starvation.What a fantastically nice world to live in. Too bad it's a fantasy. It's the rich who create jobs.No, the Middle and Lower class create jobs by providing the demand for them. The rich are obligated to provide the supply of jobs because without both the supply and demand, the rich wouldn't be able to become rich in the first place. You cannot have one without the other. If one stops, the entire system breaks.Everyone has a right to the fruits of their labor...Correct. To bad that people don't because of corporatism. The rich steal all of their fruit from the labor of their workers. You can't look me in the eyes and tell me that a rich fat CEO works harder then the coal miner that labors for him in the mines. If you can, then you're a sick, stupid fuck.The poor have no right to my earnings.They do if you earned money off their labor.So what if they can never spend their all their money.Money doesn't come from nowhere. Money is a measurement of the of the amount of work you do in your job. If money came from nowhere, it would be worth nothing. Since our entire country hasn't collapsed yet, you can only assume that all of our money is worth something; that all of our money is worth the proportional work of somebody, somewhere. Therefore, all of that money that the rich never use on anything is money that people worked to produce. By hording the fruit of people's labor, that value will never return to the market, or more importantly, the people who worked for it in the first place, which in turn makes the money worth less and less, which then makes everyone's physical labor be worth less and less. To horde money is to not only steal from lesser classes and damage the country's market, but to also make the work effort of laborers be worth less and less over time by never spending that money.I don't expect you to understand. But good for you if you do. Too bad you're probably going to be a dumb twat and keep arguing against this set of facts.The majority of their worth is wrapped up in assets anyhowAnd this changes the fact that lower and middle class laborers are having their money stolen by fat asses with hot tubs, how?By the by, the US is the most charitable nation.That doesn't make up for the horrendous sins of the rich that include them profiting from other people's labor and then sitting on top of that profit and doing nothing with it in the first damn place.