azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Well not to be rude excon and make a direct comment I was disputing what FromWithin had written. The idea of basic principle tells us that the argument of female specific amputation begins at embryo destruction naturally during a woman’s mensuration. As an embryo is alive as it is science which had developed preservation techniques through cryogenics. The point here is the embryo dies if the woman does not have sexual copulation, intercourse. Of course unless the (living) embryo is frozen, and this natural process may only be lengthen.A male sperm is produced in qualities which by nature set murder as a common united states, an event of copulation in any possible scenario. Upon copulation a large number of sperm simple die by the lack of ability to find the embryo of a woman. Yet any one woman could never provide suitable embryos for all viable sperm that are transferred to her by a male during copulation, or sex intercourse if you do not understand the word copulation. The point here is the (living) sperm die if the man has intercourse. The sperm given the same extension by cryogenics on Time of death as a woman’s embryo. Science has already made its own distinction of when life starts, and it is this scientific fact that helps make any admission to assuming the burden of officially ending life semi-pointless. Or simply alarming as the wording Pregnancy abortion violates the Hippocratic oath.To be perfectly clear excon. If you are really an excon can you see any reason why every woman, or simply said all woman must make an admission to a crime? Pregnancy abortion is an admission to a crime, it is not the accusation it pretends to be. Why else have an alibi? Comprendre? Verstehe? Capri? Entender? Ho’omaopopo? Sabe? Understand?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

What are you talking about Water Boy ?https://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/health/abortion-fast-facts/index.html Is PPH just killing less Democrat voters ??????
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Prove a zygote is a baby................................................................................................................................
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

You have literally argued a million times that it is a baby. Now you've changed your mind for the 100th time. If you want the answer to "prove a zygote is a baby............" why dont you go back and look at your own fucking arguments? You stupid stupid woman.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

You stupid stupid woman Haha ouch
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

It has human parents, through sperm and egg cell they form a combined cell which is called a zygote that has two DNA of her dad and mom.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Prove it is not!..............................................................IGNORE!
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

It is not because it has no consciousness, feet, arms, brain, organs, heart, movement, it is not born yet etc etc.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Yes, it is simply in a different stage of life. Does a two year old child look like he does as an adult?Our bodies are in a constant state of change until the day we die. Pro choice people live in a state of selfish denial and put convenience over a human life.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Okay, if the embryo is alive before it is a zygote then unless something has changed dramatically it is still alive as a zygote. Anything else I can help you with YeshuaBought?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

A fetus has brain waves beginning at 8 weeks, and most women can only tell when they're pregnant at 9 weeks. Others have been able to tell at earlier points, though.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

You were a fetus in your Mommy's womb but now you have no brainwaves whatsoever LMMFAO. Why didn't Mommy and Daddy abort you for the lack of brainwaves you don't have. ROTFFLMMFAO
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I'm pro abortion, pro choice, and anti life. The fetus has no sentience (i.e. it lacks self concept), and if aborting it improves the quality of life for the existing sentient then forbidding it is cruel and without merit. Besides, I think that creating sentient being is one of the cruelest things a sentient being can do.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

If you’re anti life, why are you concerned with improving the quality thereof?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Fair question. As long as life exists it may as well be as less miserable as possible.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Ah. I see, so you are really pro-choice who only validate the decision of the parents/mother. but sometimes, have you think that their decision is always right and cannot be wrong?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Call it whatever you like. From my perspective it is neither right nor wrong. My preference is to live in a social environment where it's permissible, though, and I don't put any restriction or caveat on that permissibility.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

The fetus has no sentienceSo, if your grandmother is in a coma, can I shoot her and get away with it?aborting it improves the quality of life for the existing sentient then forbidding it is cruel and without meritWhy would anyone be happier with killing a baby? The baby has so far done nothing to you, and yet you want to end its short life abruptly and without reason. Also, no one is forcing you to keep the baby. Put them up for adoption if you hate them that much.is one of the cruelest things a sentient being can do.First off, stating what you think is cruel doesn't really do much in the way of your argument. Explain why. Is there a reason? If so, elaborate. Secondly, your feelings don't dictate what is and isn't murder. Third, so, you said a fetus isn't sentient but then you talked about creating a sentient being? Also, why isn't killing a sentient being on your list of extremely cruel things?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

So, if your grandmother is in a coma, can I shoot her and get away with it?No, but not by virtue of that body being a person. Just as I would not endorse you being able to perform an abortion on another person without their consent, I would not endorse you being able to shoot a comatose person to whom you have no proximate connection (i.e. there other who's entitlements I would preference to yours).Why would anyone be happier with killing a baby? The baby has so far done nothing to you, and yet you want to end its short life abruptly and without reason. Also, no one is forcing you to keep the baby. Put them up for adoption if you hate them that much.I never said it would be a popular option. I just think it's fine for it to be an option.First off, stating what you think is cruel doesn't really do much in the way of your argument. Explain why. Is there a reason? If so, elaborate.I believe that existence is predominantly suffering, and that we are evolved for sufficiency rather than pleasurable existence. To create sentient life is to create a consciousness capable of suffering but incapable of reconciling it's need for meaning and significance with the reality of an indifferent universe.Secondly, your feelings don't dictate what is and isn't murder.Of course they do. Feelings are the only things that dictate that sort of thing, regardless of who is doing the defining. Where else do you suppose that sort of thing to come from? Third, so, you said a fetus isn't sentient but then you talked about creating a sentient being?I'm presuming it becomes sentient later, as is the common trajectory that people anticipate when they conceive life. I'm speaking here more to the intention than the immediate condition.Also, why isn't killing a sentient being on your list of extremely cruel things?It is, though not for that sentient's sake (they're dead, they experience nothing).
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Okay, so if it's my grandmother, I can shoot her and get away with it? No, of course not. The connection doesn't matter, because it's still murder.I just think it's fine for it to be an option.Okay, but it would be a popular option. I'm all for options: contraception, adoption, and parenting. Notice how murder isn't in there anywhere.is to create a consciousness capable of sufferingOkay, but it's not your fault that they're able to suffer. That's how living things are. It's not cruel, it's our primary biological function.Of course they do. FeelingsNo, not your feelings. Because, as it happens, you aren't a judge. If you were, then they would contribute to a decision.It is, though not for that sentient's sake (they're dead, they experience nothing)So you don't think it hurts when you die? If so, you should stop using the word cruel because cruel means "causing pain or suffering".
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Okay, so if it's my grandmother, I can shoot her and get away with it? No, of course not. The connection doesn't matter, because it's still murder.Actually, its legal in many places for the next of kin to end the life of a comatose relation. Regardless, acts that constitute 'murder' are so by extrinsic convention only; there's nothing inherent or immutable about that designation.Okay, but it would be a popular option.Given how popular and strong the opposition is to my position, I seriously doubt it would be. Either way, it doesn't affect my position. I'm all for options: contraception, adoption, and parenting. Notice how murder isn't in there anywhere.Your point? I know you're opposed to my position, but that's not an argument.Okay, but it's not your fault that they're able to suffer. That's how living things are. It's not cruel, it's our primary biological function.Fault is an incoherent and irrelevant notion. We no more determine whether we reproduce than we control the conditions of existence. To be cruel is literally to cause suffering, so any action which does that is a cruel action. Creating life is one of the cruelest acts because it is that act of creation which makes possible all suffering that occurs during that life. No, not your feelings. Because, as it happens, you aren't a judge. If you were, then they would contribute to a decision.As it happens, judges don't typically define murder either. Regardless, 'murder' is merely human intuition backed by that unique social capital which we call 'politic'. What constitutes 'murder' in one place and time won't constitute it elsewhere, and there's no objective standard for it... so it's a bit silly to make absolute statements about what murder is (it being entirely relative). And at that point, there's really no reason that the legal sentiment is any more credible than mine or yours or anyone else's. So you don't think it hurts when you die? If so, you should stop using the word cruel because cruel means "causing pain or suffering".I understood us just to be speaking of the loss of life as a harm itself. If we're talking about the method of killing/death and if that method causes suffering then it would also be cruel. Whether it is one of the cruelest acts, though, would be heavily contingent on the context. None of this is at odds with my larger position, though, so what's your point?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Should anyone dispute that you are comatose ?????????? LMMFAO
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Well Dummy how is it you came to exist ???? Did your Mommy and Daddy think you lacked self concept ???? And that was the reason you were hatched ROTFFLMMFAO
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Aborting you would have been a good idea for your Mommy and Daddy LMMFAO
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Probably not. They don't share my worldview. As evidenced by my existing.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Were you a mass of dummy cells in your Mommy's womb ????????
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Yeah, that's accurate. No fetus is particularly intelligent, really.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

You have shown that so what you got to say now ????????? LMMFAO
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

First, I'd like to get a few definitions out of the way:Pro-life: "opposed to abortion"Murder: "the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought"Person: "human"Human: "of, relating to, or characteristic of humans"So, since it's illegal to kill a person, and since a fetus is a person, meaning it's a human because it resembles a human very closely, shouldn't that make abortion illegal?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

So, since it's illegal to kill a person, and since a fetus is a personHello the:Murder is a LEGAL term.. Person is too.. Constitutionally, a fetus is NOT a person.. Therefore, you can't murder one.excon
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Murder is also a moral term. Abortion can fail to meet a legal definition, yet stoke ones moral sense as an unjustified killing of a human life, ie murder. Similarly, libertarians refer to taxation as theft and Marxists refer to capitalists as theives. Though neither fit the legal definition. Incidentally, Constitutionally a corporation is a legal person. But you can’t murder one.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

What is defined as a person by the Constitution?--------------
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

What is defined as a person by the Constitution?Hello the:Constitutionally speaking, a PERSON is a person.. Speaking again, Constitutionally, a CITIZEN isn't a person.. A fetus isn't a person. Let's look at the 5th Amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation..Clearly, all the protections offered by the amendment apply to "persons".. Now, some people of the right wing persuasion say that 5th Amendment protections are only for "citizens". But, the WORDS belie that interpretation.. Of course, the founders COULD have used the word citizen if they chose to.. But, they didn't.. That wasn't a mistake..excon
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Define person, excon. You didn't, so I'm asking again. Please define "person".
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Please define "personHello again, the:In LEGAL terms, I have NO other frame of reference than the Constitution.. It doesn't parse the word "person". That is NOT a mistake.. If it did, we'd be arguing about WHO is actually a PERSON, and protected by the Constitution, and who isn't.. And, isn't that what we're doing?? In common vernacular, however, you're a person.. I'm a person. A citizen is a person.. A foreigner is a person.. A dog lover is a person. Etc, and so on.. Again, using common vernacular, you could even SAY a fetus is a person, and you wouldn't be wrong either.. But, you cannot transpose common vernacular with legal definitions to win a legal debate.. excon
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

So, if the constitution doesn't mention the word "people", then how can it have a constitutional definition? And what's the legal definition of a person, since the constitution doesn't have one?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

And what's the legal definition of a person, since the constitution doesn't have one?Hello again, the:Read the 5th Amendment.. It uses the word "person" exclusively. If you are UNABLE to tell who it address's, you can't believe it offers protection to ANYBODY.. That may be what your intent is. I can't tell.econ
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

What is the legal definition of person?-----------------------------
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

The 5th Amendment quoted by the Mental Midget what does the 5th Amendment say ?Let's take a lookNo person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.Hello again, the:Read the 5th Amendment.. It uses the word "person" exclusively. If you are UNABLE to tell who it address's, you can't believe it offers protection to ANYBODY.. That may be what your intent is. I can't tell.So put that in context with your babble
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

A fetus is not a person and you came to being how you Idiot Dummy LMMFAO
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Okay just to get s few things out of the way. What makes Pregnancy abortion illegal is the lie it is saying on an official document as perjury, and the self-incrimination to crime it shares to the public without judicial separation. The fact that both of these crimes are much harder to prove than the admission that is made by the admission which is set as a lie from the very start. Two things not all woman officially have control at all times regarding pregnancy in any united states. The state pregnancy creates sits in a line with the medical profession and the Hippocratic Oath. By obligation to the republic and the United States Constitution. If it is believed that the mismanagement of representation directs issue of national security. These things are lies which are in effect the reason or cause for perjury, or perjuries on a grand scale. To put it simply the murder is at no point ever a single event that all woman and doctors face.The question you need to be asking is. Why must all woman make a admission to murder? EVER?no offence themadgadfly
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I know you don't care about rape victims and think they are all lying, so I wont even bother.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Ehem. How bout you, do you care about the unborn baby? you both don't care on the views of each other so why bother to each other when no one from the two of you is open to change their mind, no one seeks the right, only on who is right.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

I can barely tell what her views are, considering she's banned me from every single one of her debates apart from this one.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Who said I don't care about rape victims and that they're all lying? I merely told you I don't believe you because you've no proof to back up your claim.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Can anyone here prove how Pregnancy abortion is not an admission to murder?Can anyone tell me how all woman must admit to murder for any reason is right?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I couldn't understand a word of that.---------------------------
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I couldn't understand a word of that.Hello again, the:You're an old fart. Do you remember a comedian named Dr. Irwin Corey??? His schtick was SOUND reasonable while uttering MUMBO JUMBO. I don't think this fellow is joking, though.. excon
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

You're an old fartI'm 14.Irwin CoreyI've got no clue who he is or was.I was stating that I literally didn't understand the words he typed.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Pro-life or prochoice does not matter. Both of the responses would need to now answer the question is pregnancy abortion an admission to crime? This is a yes or no answer an alibi for the admission is not necessary at this point of separation?
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Is Pregnancy Abortion an admission to a crime? Yes or no?If it is not an admission must it have an alibi?If it is an admission to a crime under certain conditions it can become illegal as perjury, not the criminal act that is admitted too.Also if Pregnancy abortion is found to be an admission to a crime justified with alibi or not, why must all woman make this admission to crime?An extreme examples: A woman tells us she has had a dreadful experience. A female specific amputation due to medical events, and natural conditions which have left her devastate emotionally. This is completely different then a woman telling us she is officially taking control of her life by assuming the burden of a control over a brand new life.If the public is expected to presume innocents before guilt there cannot be an admission made publicly before them openly. We argue the lie with pregnancy abortion. The word Abort means to officially stop and the alibi is saying nothing has officially started. So in order for an abortion to be a truth on any official document the start must be confirmed in advance?What we agree on is this processes of confirmation does not need to happen when constitutional separation is applied to remove the admission form the general public.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

Yes or no?No, because women who're getting abortions think that abortion isn't murder.must it have an alibi?No, because there are usually records of the women receiving the abortion as well as the person preforming it.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

This is a lot of empty tautology that really just begs the question...
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

If It has a heartbeat it is alive.. the only way i condone abortion is if It saves the life of the mother or if a young girl is raped.. or anyone raped actually .. but you can always go the day after and get sterilized if that is the case ..
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

I fail to see how being a rape victim makes it okay if otherwise it is not.Is the baby somehow more guilty for being created from rape? Does it have less of a right to existence?It sounds to me like you're pro-choice. Only you feel bad about the occasional necessity, which is fine.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prochoice.

If It has a heartbeat it is alive.That's a stupid precondition because most animals don't even have hearts, which precludes them from your definition of alive.Conversely, every animal (except perhaps the sponge) has a central nervous system. When fetuses are aborted it is before they have developed a central nervous system. They are incapable of feeling physical pain.
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

Most animals don't even have hearts ??????? LMMFAOThen why is PETA dedicated to saving animals !!!!!!!! ROTFFLMMFAOReturn your brain for the money back guarantee
Debate: Are you prochoice or prolife?
Side: Prolife.

I don't think they mean it has to have a heartbeat to be alive, I think they're instead saying that if it does have a heartbeat, it is alive.