azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

You're talking from a purely emotional standpoint and not giving factual/rational basis for your argument. Still, who am I to decide emotion is inferior to factual logic.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

People can be smart and not work hard. People can be less smart and still make a profound impact on society. It truly depends on the person. I can see this argument revolves around the female race, too. Besides, how can abortion be claimed illegal by some while this isn't?We live in the 21st century. Equality is what we strive for.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

People who lack intelligence have definitely been proven to have an impact on society. People who have less intelligence tend to be more emotional and dramatic, therefore their drama tends to gloss over matters and blind people to logic, so many emotional and less intelligent reporters for example tend to create a false blind over logical matters across the world, so they need to be reduced in the population to stop them from blinding people.Of course they need to be sterilised, they are the people who are in fact the most likely to blind other people who would usually be more interested in logic.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

I believe that there is a difference between those who lack intelligence, and those who does not have an inherited intelligence. People who does not have an inherited intelligence have lower IQ scores, while those who lack intelligence is determined according to their behaviours and views that are already developed. They are the people who are in fact the most likely to blind other people, not necessarily those with a low IQ score. A person with a low IQ score can always improve and move forward.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

People who make the best decisions in fact actually have the highest I.Q's.Intelligence is the ability for the brain to make connections.If someone has a high I.Q. they are able to make lots of brain connections.If someone has a low I.Q. they are incapable of making brain connections.That is why if you explain a VERY SLIGHTLY COMPLICATED topic to a low I.Q. person and he understand after explaining it to him for hours, he then tends to forget what you had told him later, or struggles to apply what he has been told.High I.Q. people can apply things they have learnt, low I.Q. people can't, even if they understand the topic at hand.So you may say someone is learned, but they have no ability to apply and connect what they have learned. So, no, learned and low I.Q. people are not able to make and apply things to make good decisions, even if they were given a book that given them knowledge of everything there is to know.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

I believe that there is a difference between those who lack intelligence, and those who does not have an inherited intelligence. People who does not have an inherited intelligence have lower IQ scores, while those who lack intelligence is determined according to their behaviours and views that are already developed, but can still have a high IQ. They are the people who are in fact the most likely to blind other people, not necessarily those with a low IQ score. A person with a low IQ score can always improve and move forward.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

If you are unable to make brain connections you just simply don't have intelligence. Not a problem solver?Not a big fan of puzzles?Well, you obviously can't be, since you must realise by now that it takes lots of mental connections to do so.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

No, its inhumane and wrong. Not to mention IQ isn't a reliable test at because the test is objective towards a certain kind of intelligence. You cannot test for every kind of intelligence making an IQ test pointless.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Oh, do tell us, what types of intelligence are you looking for?The ability to remember where all the litter bags are put?
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

You misunderstand the point. Basically the idea is that everyone is intelligent in different ways, you can't just pin it all into one test, its the same idea as Einstein's quote: "Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will live its life believing that it is stupid." IQ tests are using an objective standpoint, they don't (and can't) test for every form of cognitive ability in a person making them fairly useless to accurately test a person's intelligence. Even for people that are intelligent in the selected areas.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

How do tell us about the different types of cognitive skills?An IQ test covers all the measures of intellect.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

No, it doesn't. An IQ test measures for one of them, which simply doesn't work to measure a person's intelligence accurately by any stretch.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2250681/IQ-tests-meaningless-simplistic-claim-researchers.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/ science-news/9755929/IQ-tests-do-not-reflect-intelligence.html http://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20121218/iq-test-really-measure-intelligence http://listverse.com/2013/05/19/8-reasons-the-iq-is-meaningless/
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Those articles don't tell me anything, other than rejecting the three best and widely acclaimed main categories of intelligence.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Well seeing as there's four articles, and none of them say that, I can tell you didn't read them.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Of course I had read them. Did you not see the articles go into how they somehow only cover three types of intellect?Well, that article is stupid, those three main types of intellect are the biggest factors in intellect.You are a real home boy.Moron!
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

By the way, did you come across Saintnow?He's a moron just like you!
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

On the contrary, the articles were discussing on how there are FOUR types of intellect. And how an IQ test only accounts for one, making the test fundamentally flawed.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

The article stated there were three main types of intellect, not four, as you stated, nowhere did it ever mention the number four.And it said that there are more than just three types of IQ.Really? Those categories of three sum up the entire meaning of intelligence.Reading something and then twisting what an article says does you no good.And where in the article did it say that the IQ only addresses 1 element of intelligence? Not even those articles had ever stated something quite as dumb, that statement only just came from your mouth alone.The IQ covers the three most major intelligence skills, cognition, reckognition/memory and verbal.What a hoot!
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

"Reading something and then twisting what an article says does you no good."I completely agree, and yes I was wrong about there being four it was three. However you pointing that out and recognizing it destroys your position. "They discovered that far from being down to one single factor, what is commonly regarded as intelligence is influenced by three different elements - short-term memory, reasoning, and verbal ability. But being good at one of these factors does not mean you are going to be equally gifted at the other two." "They found that different parts of the brain were activated when they were tested on each of the three factors." "IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence, according to a study which found that a minimum of three different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower." "Single tests that measure intelligence quotient, or IQ, may become a thing of the past. A new study of more than 100,000 participants suggests that there may be at least three distinct components of intelligence. So you could not give a single, unified score for all of them." - those are all quotes from my sources.You have failed to reference anything, and instead have tried to pit your own opinion against a study done that used 100,000 participants. You're arguments are nothing more than you stating your position and saying you're right combined with ad hominem bullshit. You have also provided no arguments whatsoever supporting your position that people with low IQ scores should be sterilized.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

An IQ covers reasoning, short-term memory and verbal ability all in one package, which when put together puts together all of the different parts that the brain uses and covers a persons full intelligence.If someone gains their whole IQ of lets say for example 100 from just the skill of verbal ability then they have still achieved 100points of intellect, it is just that they have a different brain skill than the person who has achieved 100 points from reasoning ability and different types of intelligence makes up for the other.However, if someones intelligence falls below a certain line no matter how much their balance of the three different intelligence types is arranged, they are still too be recognised as being deficit in the mind and having incompetence.As for how many IQ tests are needed?Well, that all depends on how many questions there.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

An IQ covers reasoning, short-term memory and verbal ability all in one packageAn IQ test COULD cover reasoning, short-term memory, and verbal ability. But that would require it to have three different sections, and only one of those sections would have the traditional questions found in an IQ test. While this could be done, it has yet to be,And again, your position on sterilization of people with low IQ's is still void.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

An IQ test always covers reasoning, short-term memory and verbal ability.And my position on this?People with low iq's harm society.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

And you are only repeating your position, without any evidence to support you. Nor have you disputed my point that it is inhumane and wrong to do so. Whether a person has a low IQ or not (not that an IQ test has any merit) they have a right to have kids.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Prove to me that IQ's do not cover ALL three main intelligence types!
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

How in any way does a traditional IQ test (a set of questions) test verbal ability? Or short-term memory? You need a differently designed test for that to work as the articles I referenced proved. My proof isn't a position I am making just one I am supporting and referencing because it is more qualified than you or me.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

How does a traditional IQ test verbal ability and memory?By asking different questions as well as being moderated by some exam-board like rating scheme.The same way that exams are able to test things like verbal ability, because they are judged objectively by an exam board based on what the right answers should be based on a key.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

In order to judge verbal ability you need the person to have that portion of the test to be tested verbally, hence "verbal". As to short-term memory, you would again need a separate portion of the test with some sort of memory game. Our brains work differently when they are tested different ways, you cannot simply pin it all down to questions on a sheet. The test would have to go more in depth and use different methods in different areas to test for different types of mental ability.As I said, an IQ test could theoretically do this, however traditional ones such as the Mensa test don't work to pinpoint a person's intellect accurate enough to be considered legitimate.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

It is fully possible to have a memory game on a sheet of paper.By denying that, you are also saying that it is impossible to play board games on sheets of paper, when in fact it is fully possible.Can't pin it all down on a sheet?Well, then IQ tests can consist of lots of sheets!Having your verbal abilities tested is like taking an English exam.Sorry you failed Mensa by 100 IQ points.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Actually I got a 134, not that it's relevant.And yes, it is possible to have a memory game on a sheet of paper, but I said a short term one. I.e. one that is timed quickly. The best way to do that is to have some sort of computer program run it, it would be near impossible to just give someone a sheet of paper with questions on it and get an accurate representation of their short-term memory.If you formatted the test differently by like telling them a string of answers then having them do it then I would change my objection on that pointNext, no "like an English exam" wouldn't cut it for verbal ability. Verbal ability is your ability to speak on your feet, and well. As in an impromptu speech of some sort. Or really just a regular conversation, and how well you can come up with intelligent responses. Regardless, the point is that it can't be done with just a sheet of paper.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

An IQ test is a test of how long it takes for someone to complete the entire IQ test, individual tests don't have to be timed.For memory tests, a person could look at a sheet of paper, observe it, then simply not look back at the sheet of paper.Or a person could complete a complicated puzzle that is run on nothing but sheer memory.A person could try to devise something in their head, write it on sheet 1, then write what they have already devised on sheet 2 based on what their memory is of what they had devised on sheet 1.A person could also have to remember certain numbers, but the person being tested could be made to put a highlighter other those numbers within the test as a part of some puzzle, so the person being tested is not able to look back at a number that has been highlighted or marked with some deep colour.There are numerous ways.Surprisingly, you seem to have an IQ of 134, amazing considering your not that smart, or maybe I'm just severely underestimating my own intelligence and perhaps my IQ is far beyond just 134 (I never took my results from an IQ, so I don't know what my IQ actually is). Though I suspect that I am a complete genius. Obviously someone like me is certainly an utter Genius™.Verbal ability is the ability to think of your feet, well, just time the whole IQ test then.Everything on an IQ test applies to being quick enough to answer, so timing the entire IQ test tends to be sufficient enough.And as a matter of fact, now days many IQ tests are actually on computers, so your point about IQ's just being on sheets of paper is now actually quite mute.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

For memory tests, a person could look at a sheet of paper, observe it, then simply not look back at the sheet of paper.Or a person could complete a complicated puzzle that is run on nothing but sheer memory. A person could try to devise something in their head, write it on sheet 1, then write what they have already devised on sheet 2 based on what their memory is of what they had devised on sheet 1. A person could also have to remember certain numbers, but the person being tested could be made to put a highlighter other those numbers within the test as a part of some puzzle, so the person being tested is not able to look back at a number that has been highlighted or marked with some deep colour. There are numerous ways.I agree, and as I have said multiple times a test could be made to meet these requirements. My point is that one has yet to exist (or at least be prominent enough) Though I suspect that I am a complete genius. Obviously someone like me is certainly an utter Genius™."Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity" - Frank LeahyVerbal ability is the ability to think of your feet, well, just time the whole IQ test then.Verbal ability is the ability to think on your feet verbally. There would have to be a component of speech.And as a matter of fact, now days many IQ tests are actually on computers, so your point about IQ's just being on sheets of paper is now actually quite mute.My point on sheets of paper was simply rhetoric for a list of questions.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

A lot of puzzles now days do require memory, you just don't realise it.And the extent of short-term memory that you feel needs to be test isn't actually a part of IQ.To some extent memory is connected to intelligence, such as the ability to access that memory, but to the extent that you imply, it isn't connected to intelligence.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

And the extent of short-term memory that you feel needs to be test isn't actually a part of IQ.And that is my point. IQ tests don't go far enough.To some extent memory is connected to intelligence, such as the ability to access that memory, but to the extent that you imply, it isn't connected to intelligence.You would need a fixed definition to determine intellect in order to make an assertion like that.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Intellect simply means the ability to solve puzzles, equations or problems using owns ability to think.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Additionally, you have all but dropped the argument on whether or not people with low IQ's should be sterilized. The only assumption we can make from this is that you agree with my points on it, seeing as you've been ignoring that that is the main point of this debate. You cannot answer them simply because it is a flawed position to take, and you know that.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

People with a lack of intelligence mislead other human beings, would you agree?
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Yes, I would. However, that is not a reason to take away their reproductive rights. What if they were to go to another country? While it is possible, it is difficult to undo sterilization.Not that that is my only objection to it, whether a person is an idiot or not is no reason to say that they cannot have kids. It's inhumane, and dehumanizing to say that if the government doesn't see you as sufficient then your bloodline should die there and you can't have kids.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

People being misled on a large scale is damaging to the entire world population, don't you think?Of course can't just send them to another country.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

You misunderstood my point of going to a different country. My point was that if they were to go to a different country where sterilization was not a law then it would be difficult for them to have the procedure undone.And again, it is still a horrible idea to have the government decide based on a biased standard who gets to have reproductive rights or not.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

The thing is, even if low IQ people move to another country, at least we are protecting our own.And we can even fight to include forced sterilisations in other countries too!
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Except that, again, it is so horribly wrong. You are taking away one of a person's core rights because of their mental ability. There's no excuse for that.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Why should a minorities "rights" be regarded as rights if they jeopardize the rest of the worlds safety?
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

No. Just. no.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Yes. Just. Yes.I am correct.You are very wrong.Of course.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

You just volunteered to be sterilized.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

I think that might have been you, actually.Homeboy.Now go get your sterilisation.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

I didn't say it was a good idea to sterilize. This is not one of those cases where you can just repeat what I said like calling me Sarah Palin.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

Say what about Sarah Palin?You mean that she is your favourite fan?You love butting your nose in, don't ya?Try to make a coherent argument.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

Say what about Sarah Palin?You said I was stupid like Sarah Palin after I said you were stupid like Sarah Palin. You then conveniently forgot I brought her up.You mean that she is your favourite fan?She is a fan of me? How does she even know me?You love butting your nose in, don't ya?You didn't seem to mind before.Try to make a coherent argument.I have and you were still confused. You should want me to be vague so you have an excuse.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

I assumed you were talking about ghostheadx's response, not AveSatanas.Well, ghostheadx is AveSatanas, but what I meant was when he was posting as ghostheadx.I think we had both thought of the wrong quote.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

I assumed you were talking about ghostheadx's response, not AveSatanas.You shouldn't have because I have made it very clear what we should be talking about.Well, ghostheadx is AveSatanasNo. Plus, that would be irrelevant. There are 2 different accounts. Even if it was the same physical person. but what I meant was when he was posting as ghostheadx.Yes, well when he was posting as ghostheadx he wasn't making a joke.I think we had both thought of the wrong quote.No, just you.What does any of that have to do with what we were discussing in this debate?
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

It was all your fault.Your desire not to just back down after I said I got the wrong quote proves you have been terribly affected by my "snakiness".Rofl!What snakiness?Get a life.You were completely unclear as to which quote you were referring to, Cartgirl.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Agree

It was all your fault.Wrong again stupid forgetful fucko.Your desire not to just back down after I said I got the wrong quote proves you have been terribly affected by my "snakiness".I did back down you dumb ass.You were completely unclear as to which quote you were referring to, Cartgirl.No, it was unclear to someone who is too stupid to know who Muhammad Ali was. I mentioned AveSatanas over and over.
Debate: People With Low IQ Scores Should Be Sterilized.
Side: Disagree

You did back down?It doesn't look like it.And why did you back down, may I ask?Look here, I've only been polite.