azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I much concur with much of your statement, but who's to say as for us being "Gods Creation" that is to mean we are prominent and/or special in his eyes. Is it possible he merely wishes for the better or worse of our, at times, inanimate humanity. Or does he just wish to only let his eyes set upon what is wrong and right. His morals, if he is to be, are unclear to me. You may think you know all about his true ways, but one shall consider the unclearness of things as well. Not everything in life can be unscrambled, and maybe it's better left that way.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Yesterday, the weather was cloudy, windy and rainy. Today, it is perfectly clear, sunny and cool outside. What a dramatic change a day makes.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

To what may I ask does this avail to the larger "picture" of climate change. I could have lived in an archaic society thousands of years prior and the same occurrence would most likely have happened. So this is simply just nature's sporadic flights of change.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

And what evidence are you basing that on?Bah: That's what I get for commenting based on the Waterfall, didn't notice you were referring to someone who was talking about weather instead of climate.My mistake.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Beautiful observation you've made, but we are talking about climate change, not the weather changing? Please clarify if you are trying to make a point here about climate change more specifically and/or if you are trying to make an analogy?
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Weather =/= Climate
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Rising levels of atmospheric greenhouse gases are a direct result of human activities such as burning fossil fuels which causes significant and increasingly severe climate changes (global warming, loss of sea ice, sea levels rise, stronger storms, and more droughts).
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Over the 20th century, global temperatures rose 1.4F cause of humans burning fossil fuels
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I agree climate change is man made and according to information collected by http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/  ----- since 1880 earth's temperature has risen 1.45(C) with a large spike of 0.13(c) occurring in 1940 the start of the 3 industrial revolution showing climate change is man made.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

2010 Anderegg study found that 97-98% of climate researchers publishing most actively in their field agree that human activity is primarily responsible for global climate change
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Rising levels of human-produced gases released into the atmosphere create a greenhouse effect that traps heat and causes global warming
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

I do propose that you please list your sources so you can back up your content. Its one thing to post an opinion based on facts, and its another to copy and paste things off of websites.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

http://climatechange.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001445  Here is the link Mermaid is getting the info from.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Climate change is definitely real, why else is it so hot in summer? There is scientific evidence that the earth has been warming over the last hundred years. God is the creator of the universe and he controls whether the earth is warm or cold. Greenhouse gasses are rising into gods territory and if this continues he will burn the earth and turn it into a ball of fire. If we decrease the amount of gasses going into the atmosphere then the creator of this world will save us all from global warming
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Please state your specific opinions to support your statement. There is nothing in your statement to argue against or support.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

What is needed here is overcoming this impossibility that you truly express your English skills in this manner. But who am I to criticize your prose? Is prose not a subjective value to the each of us? I apologize for making blunt rude remarks... but may you actually use clear English to represent your thoughts on this pressing issue?
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I apologize to all incoming and present debaters for this comment. The debater I was responding to changed their remark, so that is why my comment along with the one J-Argon did above mine is out of place. Again I apologize.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I seriously doubt you believe in any incarnation of a higher power (Allah, God, Yahweh, etcetera) supposed by your first part of your third sentence: "Greenhouse gasses are rising into gods territory..." You originally capitalized God at the start of your exposition, but later on- as shown by the above quotation from your text- contrasted yourself. This may have been a capitalization mistake, but from prior experience, a true Christian fundamentalist (as you imply by your association with divine force being of great influence on the weather conditions) would have made perfectly sure that God would be capitalized. It may be that you instead reject the dualist Judeo-Christian interpretation of said deity and instead associate Nature and God as one...?
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Climate change does not exert a uniform effect upon all geographic localities; some places will become hotter in the summer but others will not. There is scientific evidence of this, though, as you observe.What there is no evidence of, however, is that God created the universe and is causing climate change. It seems absurdly convenient that this God of yours will only address global warming if we effectively do it for him first.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

We're all concerned with climate change relating to CO2 but we all need to notice what humans have done in terms of nitrogen & CFC's With increases in agricultural uses of nitrogen-infused fertilizers putting them into the air, Nitrogen has an increased cycle than CO2 In the 1990's CFC emissions from aerosol cans (which as we all know were popular then) were immense and the chemicals of CFC's eat away at the Ozone layer, there is doubt that humans couldn't have had in impact in terms of CFC and with the thinner ozone layer more hot radiation is allowed to skim the earth.So with the nitrogen greenhouse gas from agricultural means, plus, the increased radiation from the thin ozone layer due to CFC creates man-made global worming
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Every month this year has been the hottest on record, with the period of January to August 1.51F above the long-term average. If it hits 3F we would be looking at 5 feet in sea level change. That small of a temperature change can bring some of the most powerful cities to ruins. An increase in CO2 emissions causes more greenhouse gasses. Its just a fact. There is no saying we aren't aiding in the climate change. We are in need of a change soon.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

According to this website presented by the AAAS, climate change has already revealed that it's definitely human induced to a degree (pun intended). So rather than keep debating with other public parties whether or not its human induced, we shall hence start focusing on how we can further prevent our man-made impact on our very own Earth. And for those of you who believe that our overall impact takes accumulative time, you would be somewhat wrong. Though the temperature increase within our atmosphere has taken time, there's direct causes of climate change as shown in the following article. http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/  Note: This article/paper clearly states that this isn't just another paper, but it is an accumulative set of data, surveys, and studies within multiple consecutive years.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Mankind is the main cause of rapid climate change in all forms. Ecosystems, in their natural state, are finely-tuned and well-balanced. With increased technologies and practices has led to increased GHG emissions in increasing global warming and climate change as a whole.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Over the past century our burning of fossil fuels has increased the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide. This happens when we burn carbon and that is mixed with oxygen to make carbon dioxide. This obviously gets dispersed into the atmosphere thus adding a pollutant to the air. Well it isn't all man made, we still should watch what we put into our breathing air.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

Carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant. I don't know where you got that information, probably from a left wing website.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Take a look at this site.http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/13/study-earth-was-warmer-in-roman-medieval-times/ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bor.12003/abstract You need to stay away from government funded agencies like NASA, who have been known to skew facts, charts, and graphs to get their desired outcome. NASA isn't building anymore spaceships, they need another way to keep their government funded jobs and the global warming hoax is just the way to do it. These scientists need to learn that the world needs ditch diggers also, they should try another profession.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Carbon dioxide is considered a pollutant when burning fossil fuels, but carbon dioxide as a naturally occurring part of humans exhaling, for example, is not really considered a pollutant. But then again, oxygen wouldn't be considered a pollutant using the same classification as I would assume you are using, however, if oxygen in the atmosphere reaches a concentration too high or low, it will have a devastating effect on a human's body. Even if carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, its concentration in the atmosphere has an effect on a number of different things.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Or look at the fact that the parts per million of CO2 have gone up 30 parts per million in the past 10 years. You can't tell me that we aren't a cause to global climate change. But I just see that our existence kind of depends on it. We need to farm for food so we cut down trees for land. We need to burn something to stay warm so we burn things and that makes carbon dioxide. We need shelter so we cut down trees to make houses. It's all inevitable cause and affect.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

There are human fingerprints on carbon overload. When humans burn coal, oil and fossils to generate electricity or drive our cars, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere, where it traps heat. A carbon molecule that comes from fossil fuels is lighter than the combined signal of those from other sources. As scientists measure the weight of carbon in the atmosphere over time they see a clear increase in the lighter molecules from fossil fuel and deforestation sources that correspond closely to the known trend in emission.... so yeah "BOOM"
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

According to http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/11/economist-explains  and https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm  Co2 absorbs infra-red heat so the more Co2 in the atmosphere the warmer the air gets. It is true that much of the Co2 in the earth's atmosphere is natural and is being emitted by many living organisms like humans and animals. But there is a natural balance between them and plants that absorb Co2 so the Co2 we produce is extra and off sets the balance causing earth to heat up.And clearing forests at the same time we let off Co2 does not help it only causes earth more of a Co2 in balance.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

There is a 97% consensus on climate change being man-made. Co2 from human industry is the main driver. New here or I would add a picture. I recommend crankyuncle and skepticalscience.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Solar panels are now cheaper than coal. :) "Energy produced by solar panels is now cheaper than that produced by coal- or gas-powered plants in most nations"
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Its basically proven now, lets stop arguing about and actually take action.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

Are you even taking all the information into account? Yes, I believe we all know climate change is indeed happening, but the fact still remains if it's manmade or not? I definitely concur that we should take action and try to sustain our wondrously beautiful Earth, But unfortunately, this is not what this debate is currently about.We already know and are trying to take action upon such horrendous effects that have been made.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

To say climate change is manmade isn't exactly to be true. As many others have stated on here it is a naturally occurring process and has been for all of known life. Yes we manufacture cars and such which produces even more nitrates and carbon emissions into the air, but as Rivers suggested earlier this would have happened anyways. Yes, maybe it would't have happened by the industrial revolutin, but who is to say Our known Mother Earth wouldn't have come up with some other way to make this happen? We can never truly know. Now I know the arguement focuses on whether or not this is man-made and I'm standing here essentially claiming it really isn't completely our fault, but if you read the first couple sentences with great care you may not help but find yourself seeking truth in my words if you, as well, are even a bit of a believer in fate. Plus every thing we do in life and make is all natural. Every chemical and just EVERTHING in general essentially all narrows down to Earth. Also, who is to say that climate change is a bad thing. What if this is what is going to, in turn make Earth a better place. Maybe our time has come to end, and another to begin in our place.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I agree with your comment because there is always two sides - it isn't all humans doing, there is natural causes. its a fact. And I agree with your last few sentences because yeah, who knows. The universe may have other things in store for the planet, we might just be a phase.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Yes there are 2 sides, but the LEADING cause of climate change wouldn't be nature, it would be us. You see, Nature cleans up after itself, we don't.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

The leading cause of climate change is co2 from industrial activity.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Climate change is naturally occurring without human influence, but that is not evidence that current climate change cannot be attributed to human influence. We can know that nature on its own would not have increased climate change absent human influence by observing what rates nature has contributed while humans have also been contributing. It makes no sense to argue that aspects of nature not affected by human influence would differ absent human influence.Whether or not we should care about climate change is an entirely different question than whether current climate change is driven by unique human contributions.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Climate change is detrimental because the rate of change is too fast for species to adapt. "Negative impacts of global warming on agriculture, health & environment far outweigh any positives."https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-positives-negatives.htm
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

climate has been changing drastically since there was life. Now I'm not saying humans aren't maybe speeding it up or affecting it, but for the most part i would say its a natural occurrence.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

With complex systems like climate we don't need to be the ones doing the majority of it, we simply need to be "affecting it" for us to be able to damage it.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

yes, we may be affecting it but we have had come backs. there has been come backs in the measurement of ice, there has been comebacks in cleaner air and polluted places have been cleaned up. we may ''affect it'' but we have always tried to clean up after ourselves.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Those "come backs" have been entirely localized, not on a global scale, and our efforts to clean up after ourselves are insufficient according to almost every scientist who has been studying this.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

so the oceans not rising '20 feet' by 2015 (as predicted by AL gore) isn't on a global scale? nature makes more nitrogen then man does, its a natural thing. and may i add, there has been no increase of the sea levels rising from its normal rate.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Pointing to a false prediction is not evidence that we have made progress, it is simply evidence that some people's estimations were off.And I am aware that nature makes more nitrogen than man, but when man adds nitrogen to the climate, it changes the already very delicate balance which, in conjunction with other gasses such as methane and CO2, leads to Anthropogenic Climate Change.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

ok so say we are affecting it overall. Nothing drastic has come of it yet, and how long have we been putting things into the air? how long have animals been putting things into the air? And what i was pointing out when i mentioned my 'false prediction' was that lots of people backed the idea that it was going to happen, and global warming was going to change things much faster. the fact is that nothing drastic has happened and that the 'very delicate' balance can take in what we give it.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

Expecting immediately results from long term cycles is not reasonable. We are seeing the effects of climate change, but they are progressive, not immediate. Pointing to the fact that it isn't all happening at once is not evidence that the climate is able to handle what we are doing to it, and just about everyone in the scientific community who actually studies this says it can't.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

oh? and are you part of that scientific community that you says largely disagrees with everyone? i would like to see proof on this. there seems to be evenly split ideas on global warming when it comes to people studying in the science field. and things change over time in progression. how would you know if its us or natural?
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

oh? and are you part of that scientific community that you says largely disagrees with everyone? Everyone? Since when does "everyone" not recognize AGW?i would like to see proof on this. there seems to be evenly split ideas on global warming when it comes to people studying in the science field.http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ http://www.ucsusa.org/globalwarming/scienceand_impacts/science/scientific-consensus-on.html#.Vk3vX7-t7FI There's evidence of the consensus. Now do you have evidence of this "even split"?and things change over time in progression. how would you know if its us or natural?By studying the correlation and historical context. You know, science.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

and the consensus is one science group. there are many others that disagree like i am. and correlation of historical context, so what your saying is that there looking back when so many things have changed?
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

and the consensus is one science group. there are many others that disagree like i am. Re-read the links, as both of them cited hundreds of scientific groups, not one.and correlation of historical context, so what your saying is that there looking back when so many things have changed?Correlation and historical context. As in looking at what greenhouse gas levels were like at different points in time and what phenomena that correlated with and how it is different today.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

I appreciate the evidence, but your comment on correlation and historical context doesn't sit right with me. I just see history as an even stronger reason to not believe in global warming, seeing how drastically the earth could change and how things changed with it.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

How so? At no point in history has humanity been doing as much damage to the Earth via emissions and cutting down trees. In what way is history a reason to not believe in global warming, and where is your evidence for your previous claim that scientists are "evenly split" on ACC.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I love your point, but I happen to find a flaw within it. Yes, we are trying to clean up our distribution of our nitrogen and carbon emissions and all of our oil spills and such, but that really doesn't matter. We could totally PREVENT ourselves from harmfully affecting as much as we do, but we choose to try cleaning a couple messes we make here and there. Modern society is making life more complicated than it has to be. Our new way of living just isn't working it's time we continue on stepping up our game on finding alternatives or we go back to how we were living say in the 18oo's or so. My deepest apologies if I'm offending anyone or sound a bit too dramatic.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

As the population rises the more fossil fuels we burn and the more pollution we create, yes natural occurrences create climate change but humans are affecting it drastically more and more each day.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

The argument that should actually be made is this: whether climate change if man made is antagonistic to the state of nature or if humans should be optimistic about this incoming and present change. But then if it is just natural causes, than we can only expect nature to change as nature needs.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

While no one can go against the facts that say humans do have an effect on CO2 levels on the planet. Our total effect on Climate Change is only 0.28% of the total. It is proven that most Climate Change is produced by nature(animals and the water cycle) and agriculture. So we should not blame this on factories, cars, and fossil fuels, but I think we should find a better way of farming that gives off less Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is manmade

I much appreciate you stating your viewpoint and conclusion of such information, but this debate focuses on if its true or not (which you just verified). NOT the actual conflicts of such changes and as to why they happen. So, therefore your stance against climate change is a contradiction of what you just stated.
Debate: Climate Change
Side: Climate change is not manmade

I believe that the question is stated wrongly. It should not say "Is Climate Change true or False?", but is "Climate Change human induced or not?" Not only has Climate Change been happening as a natural process for millions of years, but it is also proven to have happened before in Europe hundreds of years before the industrial revolution.