Debate: is god true?
Side: yes, god is true

Organize is a verb. The nouns related to it are organizability, or the ability to be organized, and organization, the state of being organized. There is also the adjective organizable, meaning that it can be organized. Please tell me if you find another word (besides verb forms), but it seems to me that organization is something that is done by someone or something, and it cannot exist on its own. I believe that true organization cannot truly exist, but yes, partial organization can. However, if the universe is organized as you say, and have so nicely explained just now, who or what organized it? You can say it was just a bad choice of words on your part, but I can't think of any word right now that can say something is organized without someone doing the organization. True, this could be a fault in the jumble of words we call a language, but perhaps it is simply because that is the way the world works. Tell me how something can be organized without an organizer."Evidence? Any stories of people who were born alone, lived alone and went on to reproduce? Any reason to believe that one could do so in all of the various environments we inhabit?"A person cannot be born alone as parents must be there. However, there are many non-social beings who are born and shortly after leave. A person cannot reproduce alone, as reproduction requires a partner. However, this is irrelevant because a being can survive without reproducing. As for the species surviving, many non-social species survive as well. As for a true story about it, well, that would require someone to write or tell it, and if the person were truly alone, that could not happen. However, you will find many fictional stories based in the real world which explain how it could work, and they are generally believable. However, emotions remain a limiting factor here. I said that we could survive alone in all but emotions. This means that, because we have emotions, we cannot survive alone, and so we don't.As for our always having social nature because primates had it, well, that really doesn't matter because the primates had to get it sometimes, and if you keep going like that you'll get to the beginning of life. Either we began with social nature or we didn't. If we didn't, we had to develop it. For us to develop it, it had to be protected. Thus, we either always had it or it was protected. It has to come all at once or not at all.By this I mean that one organism cannot have an evolutionary benefit with social nature if there is no other social being to allow social nature to take any effect at all. Thus development would take enormous luck or protection. A group would have to develop it simultaneously, and this group would have to actually come into contact, else social nature is meaningless. Social nature only works if there is someone to be social with. It doesn't mater if the social beings are single-celled or highly complex animals, the same concept applies. For a whole group to develop social nature with identical rules and morals at the same time, in the same place, either God did it or we had some really good luck. The fact that social nature is so widespread on earth means that it was either so great that this group flourished and wiped out most of the others (directly or indirectly, it doesn't matter), or it was more widespread than this single group developing social nature suddenly, and many different groups appeared across many different species or variations of a species and was suddenly completely there. If it did not appear suddenly, then each single organism that developed it would have to miraculously survive with no benefit and possible disadvantages from it to have offspring which would have to either all inherit the trait and become a group or a few would inherit it and have to be protected. Perhaps there would only be one offspring, in which case it would have to be protected. Perhaps the offspring would have other natures and patterns of life requiring them to separate, in which case they would have to be protected. Even a group would, in many cases, have to be protected, however, I cannot argue well at this point as the group itself is a protection and provides a definite advantage. I hope this makes sense to you. Please explain to me just how morality came to be without God.Set science aside for a moment and look at the end fact, the big picture and what is now and not before. We seek a happiness that cannot be found, beyond creativity and imagination as it is a happiness we cannot even find in a single story written or otherwise created in the history of Earth. If all joy we know of comes from other human beings, then a greater joy must come from God. A child who never knew his father will feel an empty space where happiness and memories should be. God is our Father in heaven, and while he has contact with us, it is not the same as actually being in heaven with Him.This is the way I see history.Somehow, something was created at some point which resulted in the first thing which eventually became the universe for whatever reason and however it happened after that point. God triggered the first reaction which lead to others. God organized the universe to the extent that organization can go, while not achieving true organization as this would not allow for certain happenings. However, it does not matter how organized the universe is so long as God understands it and made it possible for us to understand, on some level.After the universe was created, God created the first life in a place capable of supporting it. Life must be created in the same way that computers must be created. Even if we did not know that computers were created by human beings, we could figure it out fairly easily because we would not find a natural resource which produces computers and computers are complex and have many factors which only a human would make, and it could not be left to chance. We can tell that life was created by God in the same way.Somewhere along the line, there was a male and a female and they were either early humans or ancestors of them. We refer to them as Adam and Eve, although they may or may not have had these names. Perhaps they did not have language yet. Perhaps they were the creators of the first language. Whatever the case, they were the first human beings to have something that makes them, for whatever reason, special. It really doesn't matter what it was, but they knowingly betrayed God, and this is known as the first sin. Sin itself cannot be inherited, however, the mentality that allowed for sin can be, and was. Adam and Eve had children and their children had children and evolution continued.Somewhere along the line, sin got out of hand and God made the Great Flood. He made certain that Noah and his family survived, along with many animals, whether or not they were all animals I do not know. What I do know is that there is scientific proof that there was such a flood and mine is not the only religion with a story of a family, or at least a man and a woman, surviving it due to their being good. God promised not to flood the world again, and he has not.Over the course of many years God slowly revealed himself to humanity as we evolved to be more and more capable of handling this truth. Some believed and some did not. Some misinterpreted God and created other religions, often portraying him as many gods. The people who were closest to understanding ended up slaves of the Egyptains, and God set them free. The Hebrews ended up escaping from Egypt, a great military power of the time, and getting all the way to Israel. The got there following what God told them. If He did not tell them anything, they would be fairly screwed. On their journey out of Egypt, many miraculous things happened, including the creation of the Ten Commandments, which further guided the Hebrews. The Hebrews, who then became the Isrealites, never had a great military prowess, and were often on the brink of obliteration, but they somehow survived all this time. Along His path of slow revelation to the world, He told them that a Messiah was coming, and he told them that he would be a descendant of King David born in Bethlehem, among other things.Later, Jesus appeared, a descendant of King David, born in Bethlehem, the son of a virgin, and he matched all of the prophecies. He was a carpenter, and he was fairly poor. He did not fight anyone, but he performed many miracles and he taught. People would not have followed him to the extent that they did, and still do, if he did not perform miracles. The Apostles would not have done what they did if they, his closest friends, did not truly believe the words they spoke, and they could not have believed them if they were false. Jesus died and rose to free us all from sin.After his death, Jesus' followers believed that the Second Coming would be within their lifetimes, so they so no need to write things down until a few things started to happen. Firstly, distortions to Jesus' teachings were appearing. Secondly, eye-witnesses had started to die. However, people of ancient times had extraordinary memories. Also, an eyewitness would tell his or her story to many people. Some eyewitnesses were still alive when the New Testament was being written, and if they were not, a close friend or family member would be alive to tell the story.You may think that this makes the New Testament inaccurate, but any inaccuracy is slight. I told you before that I do not believe in taking the Bible literally, but I do believe that the Bible should be taken into account and read in different senses. Some parts are to be taken literally, other figuratively. I don't remember all of the forms of writing and the way to read them off the top of my head, but I do know that they exist. I also cannot be certain that every book in the Bible is true, but I do know that most, if not all, of them are. Anyways, I am the youngest of five siblings, the one closest to my age is five years older than me. Because of these siblings I was able to preview everything before actually facing it myself. I knew many secrets and tricks about my high school before ever setting foot in it. I knew, for example, that the door to the boiler room was never locked, so I could get into the school at any time through there. I was not told exactly where the door was, but i knew the vague area and was able to find it easily. I was able to see different colleges and learn about what to look for, what is a good sign and what isn't, although I only ever entered the ones that my siblings actually chose. This was also helpful in my own college selection. Much of what I know about the world, I learned from my siblings. I know a lot about beekeeping, or at least more than other people do, although I have never in my life seen a beekeeper's hive and I have never researched it, because one of my sisters is a beekeeper. I know the nicknames of her boss and her children, as well as the basic appearance, personalities, and habits of these children and her boss, although I have never met them myself. I know the basic layout of a gaming lounge that I have never set foot in because I have a brother who spends time there. I know every song and track number on a Disney CD that I have not heard because I babysit a very smart little girl who memorizes everything she sees or hears. I do not have the memory of the people of ancient times. In fact, my memory is quite poor in comparison to other people of this time. However, I can know all of these things without having any contact with them. The human brain finds stories easier to remember than just plain facts. Put that all together and you've got a better Bible than most people realize.Anyways, back to the history of the world. The early Christians spread Jesus' message as best they could, and they were persecuted because of it. However, the message still got out and spread quickly. Yes, some other religions got mixed with it every now and then, but the central idea remained, and most of the influences of the other religions left. Saints appeared, often not from believers but from the exact opposite side, and further increased belief in Christianity.Eventually, the Church became corrupt, and Martin Luther said so. He was right originally, but then he broke away and changed more than he had to, and it became more than a reform. Later, the Church reformed, but people realized that they could become protestants and broke away, forming a lot of different branches of Christianity. The one that is not protestant is Catholocism. Some people claim that Catholics are not Christian. This really angers me, as Catholics were the first Christians and remain the original Christians.I do think that the Church is not perfect. This is not to say that what we believe is wrong, but that in some cases we are wrong in the way we act to support this belief, and we often misunderstand. Also, many rituals and symbols are from other religions. Mass began as a group of friends around a table, with a priest who would consecrate the Eucharist for them. It has changed to whole communities gathering in a building which many people are not comfortable in. This change is not necessarily bad, and I do not say that we should destroy it. I do believe it is necessary, as it is impossible to have priests at every household on Sunday, and it would be silly to try. What I am saying is that it is not what it seems. People look at other religions and see magnificent structures and worship. It is a good thing to create beautiful works of art for God. It is a good thing to sing and pray and worship God, but it is not a good thing to make something so structured and intimidating that people are scared away. It is good to have community Mass, not only due to the number and availability of priests, but also so that everyone can be included and no one gets lost. It decreases the number of splits in the Church. However, many people see it as akin to the worship of the ancient Greeks or Egyptians for their false gods and goddesses, and this turns them away. It is still a gathering around a table with friends, and it is not as strict as it seems at first glance. To be catholic is to be universal, united. We have structure to remain Catholic and catholic. While some things are taken from other religions this does not make us believe in those religions...I don't know if this makes sense....I hope it does.