Debate: Christianity or Atheism?
Side: Atheism

You see, we aren't proving the Qr an, Hindu "gods" or anything else, we are on the topic of Christianity or Atheism. You are going off topic here therefore your arguments are fallacious.You may have heard of the Celestial Teapot Argument? It may better describe what I'm trying to say. I'm not going off topic, I'm trying to demonstrate what you're asking me to accept. In all debate, the one claiming something must offer proof. Since I'm arguing for atheism, which claims nothing, I have to prove nothing. The burden of proof is on you.Your attempt to "try" and help me is a wasted as attempt as I believe I am teaching you a few tricks on debate though you will never admit. Your reference to evil via "google" and man made statements is null and void when it comes to referring to my Jesus. You see, you don't understand the Holy Bible. In the Old Testament, yes, God was showing his wrath because He had to because of the poor choices of man. We live under the New Covenant and if you did your studying, you would understand the Old and New law. There isn't enough space here for me to break that down though that is a separate topic.You are telling me that you're teaching me about religious debate, and yet you haven't heard of the Problem of Evil, and fail to rebut it effectively by any means. The validity of your first claim is evident. Try again, if you please.You would show much more intelligence if you would attempt not to say a person is "petty" in any debate. That would mean we are all "petty" for having our opinion.I care little of your opinion of my intelligence. I would rather you recognise that distinguishing between telling me my arguments are wrong, and requesting me to refute your claims, despite that being the assumed idea of a debate, is petty.I know the Bible is true because firstly, I understand what the word true means, first off. Also, there is physical evidence that the Bible is true. There are copies and copies of manuscripts which show the interpretation of the Bible is true. Also, the New Testament records are so true, it's just incredible. There may be a few variants, but none of the small variants change the core of Christian beliefs. There are archaeological findings that support the Bible as well. Also, being that the Bible was written by several different writers over several centuries, the words remained quite consistent.There is physical evidence in that there is an earth, and the bible talks about an earth. Unfortunately, that does not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Bible is true. There are not copies that show that the 'interpretation of the bible is true', and interpretation is an interpretation. What New Testament records? Please justify your claims, until then they are assumed to be false. Fossils are archaeological findings, they go directly against biblical teachings. There are numerous contradictions within the Bible. If you cannot accept these accepted facts, or prove why they're wrong, then I fail to see how you can claim to be a superior debater.Who said I thought the world wasn't complex. In fact, it is extremely complex. God created each creature with such complexity it is quite hard to fathom, now isn't it?Unjustified assertion of truth.You do not know what I mean and if you did, you would again, be "god". it is clear you are pulling straws here and your attempt to do so is a failure. I think you are just mad at yourself for your own ignorance. Stop being so hard on yourself.You call me ignorant, because I think critically about the possibility of a God, because you can't proof what you claim is absolute & obvious truth, because my beliefs differ to yours? If that is what you define as ignorant, I have no problem with that.No, I am not religious. Christianity and religion are two different things all together. http://www.christinyou.net/pages/Xnotrel.html  This will break it down for you in that area.The only argument in the article was 'religion is bad, Christianity must be good, so Christianity isn't a religion'. Just in case you're wondering, I reject that argument. Please define religion, and explain why Christianity does not fall under it.