azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

No, heck she was fired from the team investigating Nixon because she was unethical.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/ zeifman.asp No, she wasn't. Research claims before making them.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

She has show no desire to stop the out of control spending that is quickly sinking this country. that being said. It would all be pointless if republicans would just get out and vote. we still lead this country 2 to 1 over dems. and if we all got off our butts and voted, republicans would never lose an election.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

we still lead this country 2 to 1 over dems. and if we all got off our butts and voted, republicans would never lose an election.http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx That isn't even remotely true. Of the three affiliations (Democrat, Republican and Independent), Republicans are the smallest at 25% (with Democrats at 31%).
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

I'd rather have her make room for Sanders .
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

She is a proven liar. Eg: Lied to the american people about what happened in Benghazi.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

When?
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

Trump lies more in a week than Hillary has in 30 years...http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/2016-donald-trump-fact-check-week-214287
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary defended a child molester, knowing full well he was guilty.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

Because she was ordered to by a judge - that how lawyerin' works, sport.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary lied about being under sniper attack, when she as in Bosnia
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary lied about the North American Free Trade agreement.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

How so?
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary said she was against same-sex marriages. And now supports them?
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

Is that a shift in position, or a lie? Much of the country shifted the same way...
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary lied about being a moderate, then lied about being a progressive.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

um, what?
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary lied about turning over all her emails, to the F.B.I.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary lied about her health, about a week ago. After falling.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: no

Hillary lied about only using one device for her emails, texting.
Debate: Should Hillary Clinton be elected for president
Side: yes

No, she only wanted to carry around one device at a time - having a series of devices, or having an ipad that she didn't carry around doesn't make what she said a lie.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

Junk food should be banned from school. It's unhealthy and can cause many conditions. Will they be able to monitor it though. Most schools already banned eating in classes and the cafeteria has to serve nutritional foods, somehow, people still get away with it.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

And just what is so healthy about sitting in class all day? Will that not also contribute to obesity?
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

It's healthy for the mind. If they go home and exercise then it won't.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

They can excersise every day, they would be fine if they just sat down. I usually stand up in class, so that helps.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Sitting is not done a lot in school at all. Nowhere near it. Not a bad age to be sitting some in a sleep either; preschoolers need it too. The wooden or plastic chairs are nice for life anyway; much nicer than most couches; a floor is nice too.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Junk food should be banned from school. It's unhealthy and can cause many conditions. Will they be able to monitor it though. Most schools already banned eating in classes and the cafeteria has to serve nutritional foods, somehow, people still get away with it.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Don't Bite the hand that feeds you!! Right------------------------Corporations donate millions of dollars to public schools. [1]One of the more popular methods for raising money is for a school or school district to sign an exclusive beverage contract with Coca-Cola or Pepsi in return for a share in the profits. The practice tripled across the nation from 1997 to 1999 and now includes 150 districts in 29 states, including many in Michigan, according to The Detroit New. [1]
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Don't Bite the hand that feeds you!! Right------------------------Corporations donate millions of dollars to public schools. [1]One of the more popular methods for raising money is for a school or school district to sign an exclusive beverage contract with Coca-Cola or Pepsi in return for a share in the profits. The practice tripled across the nation from 1997 to 1999 and now includes 150 districts in 29 states, including many in Michigan, according to The Detroit New. [1] Supporting Evidence: School [1] (www.educationreport
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

Your mom should quit eating!>:DShe might explode!!!:0 Your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom, your mom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

OMG! My moms just like that!:D I feel the love!(:<3333333333333333333333333333333333333
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

Of course junk food should be banned in schools! Just the word explains that, "junk" food. Why put that type of food right in front of kids to poison their bodies and contribute to obesity? America has HUGE healthcare and obesity issues that relate immediately to what Americans put into their bodies. You are what you eat, you can't just shovel junk food into yourself and not pay. Don't let school aged kids have the temptation, ban junk food in schools and everywhere.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

i strongly agree with all of the peoples views about junk food. As my classmates and I are doing a debate on this subject and it is certainly , definatly bad for schools to have junk food in thier canteens.Our school has junk food and about 99.9% of people at our school go the the tuckshop(canteen) to get... JUNK FOOD thats the work thats thier mind dont care about. The should think, what have i had for lunch today or how much junk food have you had today. you see this is the problem at a high majority schools they dont care about the kids all they care about is money $$$. this is very inconsiderate towards other people!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

An article in The Lancet, the worlds leading medical journal, found the likelihood for a child to be obese increases 1.6 times every time he/she drinks a bottle of sugar sweetened drink. Many schools in America do serve sugar-sweetened drinks even though they know the health risks. For example, the PowerAde our school serves has 21.5 g of sugar per bottle.Franklin Delano Roosevelt states, “It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But, above all, try something.” This means we should try banning junk food in schools. If it does not show positive results, admit it and revert to the old method, but we must try something to stop obesity.A 2001 surgeon general’s report found that over 14% of Americans are obese and over 5% of children age 6-19 are obese. In addition, 300,000 people die per year from obesity related diseases. However, the CDC reports in 2008 33.9% of Americans were obese and 37.7% of children were obese. Also 365,000 now die per year from obesity related diseases. You can see how much these numbers have jumped.Studies show that eating sugary foods cause children to be less able to focus in class. Junk food also causes tooth decay and vitamin deficiencies.Studies show that a modest school based program, teaching children not to drink soda succeeded in reducing the number of obese students compared to the control group. This is a big step towards the ban of junk food seeing it is not only unhealthy to your body, but also to your teeth. Sugared sodas are nearly as corrosive to dental enamel as battery acid. Soda’s acids are proven to reduce 5% of a tooth’s weight by corroding the enamel.A study from University of Nebraska-Lincoln finds banning all junk food from a la carte lines would result in 18% reduction of overweight and obese students. Not only weight gain occurs by serving junk food in lunches, but also poor eating habits are developed and lead to a lifetime of real health consequences. Therefore, you would not just be ruining your health as a kid, but the rest of your life as well.School lunches must meet federal nutrition standards whereas snack carts do not. This means you are getting your daily proteins and nutrients needed to sustain a healthy life from hot lunches. According to the NHCS webpage: Al la carte pizzas contain 50.4% of your daily intake of sodium, 26.1% of your daily intake of fat, 45% of your daily intake of saturated fat, and 27% of your daily calories. Compare the chicken sandwich of school lunches to al la carte: There is 460 mg of sodium in school lunches and 735 mg in al la carte. There is 1.5 times the vitamin A and twice the iron in school lunches. Sodium is scientifically proven to cause high blood pressure, elevated risk of heart disease, and kidney damage. Those little brownies from al la carte have 12 g of fat. Compare that to the school ones with 2.5 g. All these facts are proof to why junk food should be banned in schools.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Junk food Is as bad as a cigaret. It's food with fat salt and sugar. It's basically a alive killing monster!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

but troughs are the things the body craves and used to need so that it why we love them so much!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

it should be banned as it is unhealthy and can make you over weight!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Junk food in canteens contributes to the rise in childhood obesity.The kids are happier and healthier when they eat good and organic foodPoor nutrition has bad effects on a childs concentration and studying abilities.If you eat healthy food at school canteens you are more likely to be calm and not hyper.Hope that these points will help you!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

good points you person I think that those arguements are really strong.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

I feel that junk food should be banned in schools.What are junk food?Junk food are typically ready-to-eat convenience foods containing high levels of saturated fats, salt, or sugar, and little or no fruit, vegetables, or dietary fibre; and are considered to have little or no health benefits.Common junk food include salted snack foods like chips, candy, sweet desserts, deep fried food and carbonated beverages.Upon hearing this, I am sure you will realize that these are very popular among students.Junk food is high in sodium, saturated fat, trans -fat, and cholesterol, eating too much can lead to health problems such as high blood pressure, heart disease, and obesity.Junk food also lacks many of the nutrients, vitamins, and minerals our bodies need. It's helpful to remember that with fast food, moderation is important.Now, isn’t it obvious that junk food is bad for us?
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

WHAT IS JUNK FOOD NOT AREBladlg fgkls dsjgkjd fdgkj f gjfkjgfd gjfkblah blah vlsafjls;g gds
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

junk food is not good for children and older people .some chips contain plastic in them which are bad for thier health
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Junk food should be banned because it causes a lack of concerntation and obese/overweight kids. Schools don't wont complaints from parents about their kids failing or becoming overweight. It may earn you money but healthy foods can too, just as much as junk food. And anyway money can't bring you happiness or buy you happiness unless you are poor, then it can bring a little hapiness. And by the way junk food can be food poisning. NO OF YOU PROBABLY HAVE NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT! SO there, join me and say junk food should be banned in schools.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Selling junk food at school is good for the school because the school gets the money. It is bad for the students who buy the junk food. The kids who eat the junk food are ruining their bodies. It is a bad thing to do. Schools charge more for the junk food than it costs in a store. Schools try to feed you healthy things but they continue to sell junk food.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: yes

yes because its unhealthy for them to be eating alot of junk food. And thats one of the reason why there are alot of very fat people. its the schools fault for having the junk food in the first place!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

is it really the schools fault? is it not our decisions and our choices which ends up as the result? the school is just supplying us with different choices
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Good morning/afternoon fellow students and teachers. I am here standing before you today to argue my point about an extremely important subject in our young lives. Should canteens ban junk food? In my opinion, they should for the following 100% true reasons. First, I am sure parents would feel much more comfortable knowing we are eating a nutritious lunch instead of a salty, sugary, fatty, buttery one. A vital reason to eat healthy food is for our fitness. It helps when we want to be fit, to have wholesome food to eat during the day to restore any lost energy. Yes, sugar is an energy source but it doesn’t last long, nor provide the nutrients and vitamins our bodies need. You might be thinking, if it such a big deal about unwholesome canteens, why don’t the parents just make the lunch for us? Well, most could. But some don’t have the time or the money to do so. So they need their child to buy lunch at the canteen. Another reason why junk food should be banned from school canteens is because today, in the world, there are increased cases of diabetes, obesity and heart conditions in children around the world. Did you know that 300,000 people die of obesity related health problems a year? That’s SCARY! Think about it. Eating junk food at school every day is just adding that to our bodies, decreasing our health, fitness and wellbeing and slowly killing us. We are also becoming more at risk to having heart attacks or strokes at a young age. It is a terrifying fact to know that heart surgeons are now operating on 18 and 19 year olds who have already had one or two previous heart attacks. My point is, and I do have one, if we eat these foods almost every day, we might end up like that. It is enough to make me sick to think that most of the foods canteens sell are jam packed full of sugar, salt, additives and preservatives. They are not, however, full of vitamins and minerals in which are in beneficial foods like fruit, vegetables, dairy, etc. We need these to have a thriving brain and body. The school is selling these things, don’t forget yet they are the ones PROMOTING GOOD HEALTH. We should ban food being bought at the canteen of the morning unless it is a lunch order or fruit of some sort. That way, we won’t have children eating jelly, popcorn and chips before nine o’clock.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

WOULD YOU WANT TO BE A FATTY!WELL THIS CAN CAUSE SOME PEOPLE TO DIE AT A EARLY AGE AND HEART ATTACKS!
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

it is unhealthy and have low nutritional value. It is being blamed for the increase obesity . Based on the statistics from the Health Foundation it has shows that most of the snack foods such as chips, soft drinks, hamburgers, instant noodles, and cookies are categorized under foods that have low nutritional values.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

It should be banned in schools, not only in Australia but all around the world. I said yes because junk food have chemicals in it, it has high levels of salt, sugar and oil and it is low in nutrition.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Yes, schools should ban junk food. I say this because first of all, our country has the highest rate of obesity, and second of all 60 million (20% of the population) are obese or overweight. That is really bad not just for our country, but also for our entire world.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Me as a kid would get obese and would get fat and then get bullied for being fat
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

I think that canteen members should ban junk food from canteens. 1. Because it is a school not a super market. 2. Because it loses concentration to kids/students. 3. I'm sure your parent has packed you enough food especially "junk food".
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Because eating too much junk food will cause weight gain health problems like diabetes high blood pressure,and high cholesterol problems and many more health problems
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Vending Machines are a major source of childhood obesity: Over 80 percent of middle schools and 97 percent of high schools have vending machines, and 83 percent of those most “primarily [sell] foods of minimal nutritional values,” according to a 2011 study in the Journal of Adolescent Health.An article in The Lancet, the world’s leading medical journal, found the likelihood for a child to be obese increases 1.6 times every time he/she drinks a bottle of sugar sweetened drink. Most drinks served in school vending machines have high sugar content: Powerade- 21.5g of sugar (bottle)Gatorade- 21g (bottle)Coke- 64g (600ml)Sprite- 61g (600ml)
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

junk food should be banned inschools because it can cause child obesity and lack of consentration
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Yes.Because Junk food leads a child's life to a life which is full of diseases.Such as obesity,Diabetes (type 2).Also it will increase the risk of getting heart attacks,damages the liver,cardiovascular diseases,leads to chronic health conditions,depression..etc.Intake of junk food cause memory problems,lessens the ability to control appetite.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

So, now we want the government to tell us how to eat too. First, it was cigarettes, then alcohol, and now food.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

Are you seriously comparing food with something like alcohols and cigarettes?
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: No

I believe it should not be banned. For one thing they will try to smuggle it in and that's not a good thing either. Second of all, it's not going to solve child obeisity because they will just turn around and eat it at home. We should try and teach them better eating habits. Which brings me to my next point. When schools are teaching these things, they should try and make it more interesting. I think most schools are still on the food pyramid and such which in my opinion is boring. Kids don't want to listen to that kind of thing. Also, they can try things like you have to buy one healthy thing before they buy a junk food. And my last point, schools should try and make the healthy things taste better. There are some schools with awful food which makes the kids want to buy junk food. Therefore junk food should not be banned in schools. Instead find interesting alternatives to teach healthy eating habits.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

When was the last time you smuggled junkfood FAILAn article in The Lancet, the worlds leading medical journal, found the likelihood for a child to be obese increases 1.6 times every time he/she drinks a bottle of sugar sweetened drink. Many schools in America do serve sugar-sweetened drinks even though they know the health risks. For example, the PowerAde our school serves has 21.5 g of sugar per bottle.Franklin Delano Roosevelt states, “It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But, above all, try something.” This means we should try banning junk food in schools. If it does not show positive results, admit it and revert to the old method, but we must try something to stop obesity.A 2001 surgeon general’s report found that over 14% of Americans are obese and over 5% of children age 6-19 are obese. In addition, 300,000 people die per year from obesity related diseases. However, the CDC reports in 2008 33.9% of Americans were obese and 37.7% of children were obese. Also 365,000 now die per year from obesity related diseases. You can see how much these numbers have jumped.Studies show that eating sugary foods cause children to be less able to focus in class. Junk food also causes tooth decay and vitamin deficiencies.Studies show that a modest school based program, teaching children not to drink soda succeeded in reducing the number of obese students compared to the control group. This is a big step towards the ban of junk food seeing it is not only unhealthy to your body, but also to your teeth. Sugared sodas are nearly as corrosive to dental enamel as battery acid. Soda’s acids are proven to reduce 5% of a tooth’s weight by corroding the enamel.A study from University of Nebraska-Lincoln finds banning all junk food from a la carte lines would result in 18% reduction of overweight and obese students. Not only weight gain occurs by serving junk food in lunches, but also poor eating habits are developed and lead to a lifetime of real health consequences. Therefore, you would not just be ruining your health as a kid, but the rest of your life as well.School lunches must meet federal nutrition standards whereas snack carts do not. This means you are getting your daily proteins and nutrients needed to sustain a healthy life from hot lunches. According to the NHCS webpage: Al la carte pizzas contain 50.4% of your daily intake of sodium, 26.1% of your daily intake of fat, 45% of your daily intake of saturated fat, and 27% of your daily calories. Compare the chicken sandwich of school lunches to al la carte: There is 460 mg of sodium in school lunches and 735 mg in al la carte. There is 1.5 times the vitamin A and twice the iron in school lunches. Sodium is scientifically proven to cause high blood pressure, elevated risk of heart disease, and kidney damage. Those little brownies from al la carte have 12 g of fat. Compare that to the school ones with 2.5 g. All these facts are proof to why junk food should be banned in schools.
Debate: Should junk food be banned in schools
Side: Yes

um.... isnt this suppose to be on the other side...?.....? isnt this the one about how junk food should not be banned?......? errrrrr isnt it????????????????????