Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

It fits perfectly within naturalistic theory. Not only that, bot the effect these phenomena have has been observed countless times. / Unless you can come with a reason as to why my explanation is invalid, I'll consider it perfectly so.People can always come up with explanations for the world. Thats what science is supposed to do. But thats begging the question, as I said. Science presupposes naturalism, but if supernaturalism is true, then at some point science will be looking past reality. What this means with Christianity is that evolutionists look past the creation of the world, trying still to understand the world before its creation. Thats begging the question, if you cannot see that. That being said, every argument has to have its primitives. But science already understands that primitive, and takes it for granted. So,if you cannot tell, the argument for proof for either side is irrelevant. The presuppositions are what matter. The primitives need to be changed. This is why I don't really debate evolution any more: its pointless, since both sides are right, under their presuppositions. But primitives cannot simply be proven or disproven, by definition. So, this comes down to desire, because it has nothing to do with intellect: would you rather believe in a world that is godless, or one that has a god in some way shape or form?While on the topic of "explaining away", don't YEC's do it as well, and with little to no evidence to support it? They always say God solved the "lack of genetic variety" problem by just adding more genetic variety, despite the lack of supporting evidence from Scripture.No one's denying evolution. Young Earth Creationists deny the extent to which it had a role on the planet. In fact, we claim that evolution works a lot faster than what evolutionists claim. The only reason evolutionists claim such long lengths of time is because that is what is needed for mass genetic change. But the changing of the genetic information of varieties within certain static groupings, there is fast genetic change! Thats why we have such a great number of dog breeds and cats breeds. None of the information that we have contradicts creationism. In fact, 2 Peter 3 prophesies evolution, or at least the denial of the flood for a naturalistic explanation for the world:This is now the second letter that I am writing to you, beloved. In both of them I am stirring up your sincere mind by way of reminder, 2 that you should remember the predictions of the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior through your apostles, 3 knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. 4 They will say, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” 5 For they deliberately overlook this fact, that the heavens existed long ago, and the earth was formed out of water and through water by the word of God, 6 and that by means of these the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. 7 But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly. So, not only do we scientific backing, but we have prophesies backing us up.