azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Have you ever heard a christian say God/jesus lives in me? What does this mean to you? It means Being a christian and beleiving in God and his word is a priority in our lives not a side dish of the main meal.This means nothing to me because I am not a Christian and I do not believe God exists. You can make the Bible the number one priority in your own life but you do not have the right to force it to be a priority in other people's lives, with legislature that mandates restrictions on things like marriage that are derived solely from personal disgust or religious doctrine. And I would say God would not want this for our country. Why do you think this should matter to people who believe God wants something different for this country (like equality) or the people who don't care what God wants when it prevents the advancement of civil rights? What gives your religion, and your particular interpretation of your religion, the right to make decisions for everyone?Will I persecute anyone for it? Absolutely not. By trying to prevent homosexuals from getting married, you are persecuting them. There are thousands of couples who are truly in love and want nothing more than to have their relationship recognized by the country they live in, and you are saying that because you hold a particular set of beliefs, they should not be allowed to do so. They should be set apart from other citizens as inferior and undeserving of equal rights. That the government should send the message that the emotions and attractions they are feeling are less respectable, less acceptable, than those of their heterosexual neighbors. You can say all you want that you love them and just want to help them but your actions speak to a very different sentiment. If I do not say this is wrong, then i cannot say smoking is wrong, I cannot say overdouse on alchol is wrong, I cannot say lying is wrong, I cannot say swearing us wrong. Do you see where Im getting at?I do and it is misconstrued. Homosexuality is not an addictive and harmful substance, and it is not a dishonest act that creates a victim. It is an orientation, and that's it. It's a person being attracted to other people, desiring a relationship with someone they are attracted to, and eventually wanting a relationship to be granted the same respect as everyone else's. It's not the scary, twisted, immoral or dirty perversion that you are trying to make it out to be. I Have placed my trust in the hands of Love. This is where I will be.Again, I do not care about this in the slightest. Your faith is your own business and does not give you license to impose its restrictions on people who do not believe the same things you do.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

alright fair enough this is where we stand. nice talking to you.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Can't argue with your Christianity, I don't know firsthand. Thank you for understanding that saying "God loves everyone... But the gays will burn in Hell forever", is not an acceptable argument. I do not believe homosexuality to be a sin, because really it's just who you love, in my opinion. Thank you for having at least a smidge of dignity and self respect (More than can be said for most people on here!) and not calling homosexuals every dirty word in the book because you are afraid of things that are different. This being said, I believe your thinking is flawed. As much as I admire you for wanting to pull others off the boat, I really think it should depend on what you've done, not who you love or what deity you worship. (If only one sect of only one religion is right, a whole lot of people are going to Hell for nothing.) Could a forgiving god damn his children for something they cannot help?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

We choose to surrender our lives to him or not. All the people have a choice. He is the judge of who is going to hell or not i am not. We will die with our sin if we do not give it over to JEsus christ. Our sin will pull us in to hell. YEs it is a narrow path but it sure is a lively one. Yes that is true. People that do not live under the light will serve no purpose. It does not depend on what you have done. It depends on what you are doing. what are you sepnding your life on? We are all his sheep. He is the shepard. He is the way the truth and the life. Sry but all these different paths we created are not going to save you from yourself. Jesus will take you as you are and build you up. You will see life under a totally new persective.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I don't think I completely understand what you're saying. Are you telling me that I have to burn in Hell because I don't worship Jesus Christ, no matter how good a person I am? I'm not trying to ridicule you here, I'm honestly confused.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I have been trying to say that to Christians for YEARS! Thank you!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

"Wow. You do understand that one of the most important aspects of a relationship beween man and women are children? Right?"That's not always true. I know many happy heterosexual couples that don't have children.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Bullshit.I've known my best friend since I was in 4th grade. Today, I'm married.And before, during, and after meeting my wife, I would sleep over at his house all the time. I never thought anything of it. In fact, he always made the jokes about it, like 'Hey dude, don't molest me please while I'm asleep, even if I tell you not to stop.' I'm as straight as a board, and I found phrases like that positively hilarious. Just like as if he had been straight.And it was never hard on me. Never. Nor him.I was never even uncomfortable hugging him. I still do, even. And my wife doesn't give a holy hell. Because there's nothing gay or uncomfortable about being great friends with a man who is attracted to other men.So don't make the assumption that it's harder for straight men to be friends with homosexual men, because the fact that there are 6 billion+ people on this planet mathematically proves you wrong.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Though it is not good to judge,I very well agree with him when he says its hard for a straight guy to have a friendly relationship with a gay man...
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

I very well agree with him when he says its hard for a straight guy to have a friendly relationship with a gay man...Above is an argument so ludicrous as strikes me into awe and amazement. You are essentially arguing that "their being this way makes me uncomfortable and therefore they must be oppressed and vilified".How any rational, sane person could possibly accept this logic, or even read it without bursting into a fit of uncontrollable laughter, is quite simply beyond my powers of conception.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

First of all,What i said was not an argument..and i never argued that "they must be oppressed and vilified".
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

First of all,What i said was not an argumentThat, sir, is blindingly obvious. and i never argued that "they must be oppressed and vilified".Please read your tag.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

well according to the word of God it is considered a sin.If you're going to make as bold a claim as that, you need to first prove that a god exists in addition to the simple requirement of proving that that god wrote the book which you use as a moral reference.Then you would have to make a convincing case why anyone ought to listen to such a god, on matters of morality, when such a thing is a disguised appeal to authority. We do not get our morality from authorities, but from ourselves. So why should anyone listen to an alleged god?I beleive in the word of God.That's still a belief then, I wanted reasons besides belief.Second, it does not serve any purpose.Why must it? It's enjoyable, and that is enough for most things.When a man and women has sex it has the potential to result in a baby.Sex is not merely for procreation, and there is a greater number of children out there than parents, which would seem to suggest that procreation isn't greatly needed and that gay couples should take in those children who don't have parents.When a man and a man has sex it results in absolutely nothing.It results in an orgasm. That's hardly nothing.Well except aides.All sex has this potential. In case you missed the memo AIDS is not a gay disease.It is disgusting to be honest with you.Then don't engage in gay sex. We all have our preferences. I actually find it quite agreeable.Also it is hard for men to establish relationships with other men who are gay.Much of this is because of the centuries of severe repression of homosexuality by bigots.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

"it is considered a sin"then again, so is judging other people (judge not lest ye be judged)"I beleive in the word of God"obviously not, considering ye judge"When a man and women has sex it has the potential to result in a baby"generally an unintended consequence. Does that make condoms immoral as well? Or oral sex?"It is disgusting to be honest with you"I am at least relieved that you were lying the entire time up to this.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

So... You also believe that a rebellious child being stoned to death is necessary, because "you must do what you can to purge the world of all evils." Or that a woman being who was raped in a city must also be stoned to death because "she did not yell out for the city to hear her and aid her"?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

WELL ACCORDING TO THE WORD OF GOD IT IS CONSIDERED A SIN.Under the presumption that the word of God is even reliable, you forgot to mention the other half of the story. The word of God also mentions that it is not your place to judge people but Gods. It says that judging is a sin and also says that all sins are equal. Therefore, not only are you stepping out of your place by trying to judge a homsexual but you are also commiting a sin equal to theirs with judgement. How can you really be that hypocritical? Finally, the word of God also says that all people are equal and you have no right to undermine someone by their possition because you are just as wrong as them
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

The Bible said that god loves all but then it what's to say that gays are bad!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Calling the behavior of gay sex does not stop God from loving, gays.......................................................................
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Calling the behavior of gay sex does not stop God from loving, gaysThe Bible orders their execution you utterly delusional woman.“If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.” (Leviticus 20:13 NAB)
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

In the Old Testament, Yes. In the New Testament, gay sinners are treated like other sinners, and called to repent, and receive Yeshua, so they can be, saved. Let He whis withou sin, cast the first stone said Yeshua in John 8.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

well according to the word of God it is considered a sin. EDITED: Well--according to the word of God--it is considered a sin.I beleive in the word of God. Second, it does not serve any purpose.EDITED: You can omit the first sentence, as it is redundant. As well, omit "Second," because you never had a "First." Then you can combine the two sentences using a semicolon.When a man and women has sex it has the potential to result in a baby.EDITED: When a man and a woman have sex , it has the potential to result in a baby. This would be the same for the next sentence. The agreement is incorrect.Well except aides.EDITED: You should omit this. First of all, the tone is wrong. Second of all, it's a sentence fragment and cannot exist on its own. Third, it's AIDS; Fourth, the claim you made is misleading.It is disgusting to be honest with you.EDITED: This claim is irrelevant to your main argument. Your main claim is that according to the Word of God, homosexuality is a sin [disputed]. Therefore, you should provide evidence for why it is a sin [disputed] rather than showcase an opinionated sentence.Also it is hard for men to establish relationships with other men who are gay.EDITED: Also, it is hard for gay men to establish relationships with other gay men. [This claim is disputed].Also, I would say I disagree with you but it's hard to figure out what you're trying to say.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Why do you believe it is right?Can you justify it as more than just following passions and urges?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

How would you feel if your dad leaves your mom for another guy?? It's just stupid for a man to sleep with a man. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Wheres your evidence to justify your argumentWhat if god wasn't realIf he didn't male anyoneWhat then?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

As very much as I'd like to claw your eyeballs out of your skull right now, I am instead going to make a mature argument. First of all, why the hell would you bring The Matrix into your religious argument? It was a great movie, don't disgrace it. Secondly: I've said it a million times, but I'll say it again; Wiccans. Are. Not. Devil worshippers, dammit! Leave MY religion the hell out of this! Furthermore, what you've written is just a bunch of gibberish about eyesight, movies and recovering from homosexuality, which is impossible. If you were here I would kill you, but since we're on the Internet I'll just ask you to kindly piss off.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I've read the bible and I don't remember anything about Eve having sex with satan. Cain is Adam and Eve's child just as Abel was and he killed his brother because of jealousy. And maybe if you picked up the freaking bible once in a while you would know that only about 2 sentences of what you said is truth. So, my advise? Stop preaching if you have no idea what you're talking about.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

What if god isn't real???????????????????????????????????????????????
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Are you that retarded? And is your point really that weak that you require all caps to put it across? Honestly I get more and more surpised by the dumbness of the world on a daily basis. Like are people really this stupid and neglegent? or is it just you?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Ohhhhh but its ok if ur dad leaves your mom for another woman....... I dont belive in religion but any body who cheats on anybody is wrong no matter what the sexual orientation (my point of view!)and not to be mean or anything how do u know that adam and eve were the first ppl on earth...u cant say they were if they never had any proof of it and the first ppl came from africa just to let you know!
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: androgynous Adama

God brings Adam and Eve into being as a dualistic entity, part male and part female, physically united as one created "in His image." The Torah text follows the initial formation of androgynous Adam and Eve with a description of how God separates them into male and female entities. Quote from http://biblical-studies.ca/blog/2011/02/ 13/androgynous-adam/ "Rashi, a 10th century Jewish interpreter, suggested the first human was male on one side and female on the other and that God had simply divided the creature in half ... Trible argues that God created the first human without gender, “the adam” [human] was formed from “the adamah” [humus]. Rather than a man, “the adam” was an “earth creature” (as an aside, there is a great play on words in the biblical text: “Yahweh Elohim formed the earthling from the earth” or “the human from the humus”). "
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

I keep disputing people who agree with me how stupid is that?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Homosexuality is not natural . If you want to be gay , keep it in the closet; instead of spreading this sickness. I am not a religious fanatic, or a Westboro Baptist Church member (those people are just pure evil) We all have our duties, man on bottom and woman on top ... that is how we were made to be, DO NOT influence a change in this ....
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Unfortunately for you living in the dark ages still...dude really come out to the light...its not so bad out here. But seriously if you turn around and say homosexuality is unnatural then how come being heterosexual is not deemed unatural? How would you feel if someone turned to you just let's say in a reverse of the cycle and I believed that being heterosexual is wrong. You are heterosexual, I'm assuming you are. So now how would you feel if suddenly...you felt isolated from everyone, no one accepts your sexuality because being heterosexual is wrong...and your religion deems it unclean and people are suddenly trying to beat you up just because you like men/women and your a guy/girl but in societies view your actually supose to only like women/men...now how does it feel being on the other side of the fence mister know it all?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Leviticus18:22 Do not lie with a man as one lies with a women; that is detestable. Sodom and Gomorrah Destroyed Genesis 19
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Hold on, you're truly religious? Wow! How is that possible? You believe in a big magical being that controls everything because your mommy told you that was the case? If your mom told you that there was a giant pancake in the sky you would believe that.Don't be such a naive fucking zealot. God isn't real, however reassuring it is to you.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

This is what I think.The Bible says to let the righteous be righteous,let the unrighteous be unrighteous(Revelations) and to warn sinners of their sins(Ezekiel).(While letting them be!)so therefore,Christians are prohibited by the Bible to force anyone to conform to their beliefs(while keeping their own).And that makes sense.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Marriage is between opposite genre. The notion of friends is partly for people who like someone of the same genre.What do homosexuals found on their partner that is not friendship?It's like loving your own body
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Big surprise.Is homosexuality wrong?YesWhy is it wrong?Here's one reason... why is paedophilia or incest wrong? What gives religions the right to take away the freedom from homosexuals?What gives homosexuals the right to marriage? (which is a religious thing)Why are people so ignorant to think it is a choice?Why are people so ignorant to think you have to act upon it.Why?Why?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Pedophilia and incest is wrong because in incest it leads to deformity in the childrenPedophilia is wrong because it involves a non-consenting child, the child does not (in almost all cases) know what he or she is doingHomosexuality is okay because both partners are consentingNothing gives religions the right to take away anyones rights, who ever said we should abide by everything they say?So what if it's a religious thing, marriage is between to consenting adults who are deeply in loveHomosexual relationships are between two consenting people who love each otherSo they should be able to marryAnd from sometime this month they should be able to marry legally in the ukI don't get why proper think it's a choice, it really isn't, I wish I was straight but I can't beWhy shouldn't I act upon it?Why should I have to live my life alone where heterosexuals can go out and marry 6 guys at onceDoes that not devalue marriage?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

christjesus and cuntyguy2 are two of the most prolific trolls on this site. christjesus in particular is a raging homophobe and manages to work "fag" into everything he posts. Neither of them appear to be interested in or capable of rational discourse, they exist on this site purely to be "humorous" or annoying.You may ban them from your debate or downvote them as you see fit, however it may be best to simply ignore them. If they get under your skin, they win.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

cockmuncher------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

cockmuncherWow dude. Way to be mature bout the situation. You know, maybe you should try to actually debate, not say stupid lil kid stuff.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Nah I'm good. You suck asshole and I say rude words. You'll always be sicker in the head than me.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

The funny thing is, at least I know that I'll always have friends that will back me up no matter what. I have a family, whether or not they're blood means nothin, they're still family. We may all be "sick in the head", but we're still a family, no matter what. Homo and heterosexuals.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You're all a bunch of cocksuckers then.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Dude, you really need to grow up. Learn to use language that doesn't make you sound like an immature teen, and find a way to actually argue that makes sense and actually has any effect. And you need to broaden your vocabulary a bit.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Nah I'm ok.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I agree with your views on homosexuality.Just wanted to add that I don't see anything wrong with incest, as long as informed consent is given. To me it's yet another minority sexual orientation that, like homosexuality, gets derided for little reason.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Just wanted to add that I don't see anything wrong with incest, as long as informed consent is given.Incest is one of those peculiarities of nature which are punished, as if by a God or some corrective force. Among its fellows it counts paedophilia, squandering the young on wars and such; and various other vile and loathsome acts.Incest promotes genetic disease and compromises the bloodline, which is why we have evolved an instinctive aversion to it (the mechanics of that evolution are largely irrelevant).
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Yeah, I see the evolutionary reason to discourage incest, and it's probably true that we've developed an instinct against it. But since a number of historical societies allowed incest amongst relatives like first or second cousins, and a few allowed fraternal incest, I'd say that culture also plays a big role in determining how repulsive it is.In any case, the evolutionary argument is largely obsolete in the present day. A blanket law against incestuous relationships would be hard to justify on medical grounds as we now have so many ways to guard against conceiving children with genetic defects, and there are no similar laws banning relationships between other people who are likely to pass on genetic defects.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You know what is worse then all of these things that come with incest? The nature of it. Sinful.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Since I'm not religious, I don't categorise things as "sinful" or "not sinful".I do categorise things as "morally acceptable" and "morally unacceptable", but I don't see anything inherently immoral about incest.