Debate: Dreamers were brought here as children. Should they be deported to - who knows where?
Side: America is their home

Which countries specifically by what metric? As far as I can see the opposite is true, take for instance Venezuela. Don't go labeling European countries with socialized healthcare as examples because they are still capitalist. Iceland is the perfect example. I would suggest watching the documentary "Inside Job".I personally think that a need to reward those who work hardest or are most useful will always be necessary, thus creating a two-class system in any communist country "Work hardest". Hardest for what? .. Personal gain is the foundational precedent of this idea of "working hard" in capitalism. Common gain is more "useful" for more people. Majority rules, ergo, the de facto most beneficial society is the one that benefits the most people, the most. Capitalism doesn't achieve this. More than half of the world's wealth is concentrated in the hands of fewer than a hundred individuals.Do you think that these wars were about spreading an ideology or were they about natural resources, imperialism and domination?Modern territorial expansion for control over more resources is at its heart a profit driven enterprise: money grants power. The East India Company; the fall of Saddam; the destruction of the democratically elected government of Iran; the reinstatement of the Shah; the sabotage of the Mexican economy; the coup in Libya; the sanctioning and ostracism of the Soviet Union by capitalist countries; the forced erection of fiat banking worldwide. These aren't random events.As for the rest of this, time will tell, but I'll leave you with a thought:If half the world's wealth is owned and controlled by less than one hundred individuals or entities, who collectively have more purchase power than the poorest 50% of Earth's population, and this disparity is only increasing as more countries adopt capitalism as their mode of economy, then it is safe to conlcude that the capitalist system intrinsically drives inequality. This is not evidenced by this single facet alone. The mode of currency creation itself, in capitalist societies, is engineered for this purpose. When curency is created on a loan, the value of a person's work is the obligation of the payee to the lender to be given under strict conditions and exorbitant interest (most of us use credit because mean global wages are almost always insufficient for a comfortable standard of living), yet the lender has NO responsibility for ascribing "real" value to the loan it gives out. It effectively creates currency from thin air and demands a person's time and effort in return. The issue is that when this inflationary system inevitably deflates, the creators of fiat-currency -- the most significant usurers -- demand back more than the value of what they have created, which inevitably leads to mass foreclosure and default which is legally enforced on the populace: this is a systematic redistribution of not only current, but future, wealth.It's already a rigged system; it is oppression by economic engineering. Just because the tyranny isn't written in law or engraved on the side of a chemical weapon, does not make it any less insidious nor real.My desire isn't to take from everyone, it is only to engineer a system that rather than fleece the common person, takes back control and gives it to the masses who are being exploited at present. That's what democracy is MEANT to be. The power of the common people over ALL aspects political, social and economic, for the benefit OF ALL those people.Oligarchy, it is not.