azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

to show animals morphing into different kinds of animals, you have to use cartoon animations. Piles of bones are piles of bones.Wolves being bred for domesticated dogs are still dogs. Wolves and dogs are dogs. I don't know about foxes.Wolves can be bred to produce dogs, zebras and horses can interbreed..........Then you go off into piles of bones. When you can take a pile of bones and morph it from a reptile into a bird or whatever, it's going to be only in cartoons and it's funny.Wolves, horses, and foxes are observable animals. They do not change into monkeys.The piles of bones you talk about are piles of bones which cannot be observed from generation to generation. Saying one pile of bones morphed into the animal which left the bones of a different kind of animal such as an amphibian into a mammal or a reptile into a bird is a belief and is not science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

How many mutations would it take to go from wolf to dog?How many mutations would it take to go from horse to zebra or moose or deer?How many mutations would it take to go from Coelacanth to Eusthenopteron?How many mutations would it take to go from Eusthenopteron to Panderichthys?How many mutations would it take to go from Panderichthys to Tiktaalik?How many mutations would it take to go from Tiktaalik to Acanthostega?How many mutations would it take to go from Acanthostega to Ichthyostega?How many mutations would it take to go from Ichthyostega to Tolerpeton?Still waiting for that scientific definition for kind...
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You can take a wolf and count the generations to produce a dog, and the various breeds of dogs. That is observable science, it is not new DNA being added to the genome of the wolf, it is not evolution.You are mixing things up, implying your piles of bones morphed into different kinds of animals when you never saw even one generation of their offspring. That is not the same as wolves being selectively bred to bring out preferred traits which were part of the genome before the selective breeding was done. New DNA was not added to the wolf to produce dogs.Your stupid lists make you look like a robot
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

wolves and dogs are the same kind of animal. You know that. I don't care to look at your skeletons to see if they are the same kinds of animals, but the way you are presenting them they probably are not and there is no evidence that one mutated into the other except for you saying they did....and you say they did because somebody told you they did, and they show it in cartoon animations and nowhere else. That's not science, it's the funny pages, the Sunday Comics.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

wolves and dogs are the same kind of animal. You know that.I'm glad you know that since it shows the same exact type of progression that is needed for each step of evolution.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Wolves being bred into dogs is not evolution. It's selective breeding. It can be shown, observed, repeated. You can study it in true science.Amoeba morphing into people is something you can believe happened but it cannot be shown, it cannot be observed, it cannot be repeated. Evolution is pseudo-science, it's made for suckers
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

So, you have evidence for heritability, mutation, and selection - wolves to dog.And you have evidence in the fossil record showing that the same level of changes going back in time and you can't put 2 and 2 together?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

If you can evolve changes from wolves to dogs, explain why larger changes can't happen? It is more than enough to base a hypothesis on. Much more evidence than there is for the Bible. (this is of course putting to one side the fact that we have found millions of bones showing different stages of evolution separated by time).
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Larger changes do not happen. What do you mean explain why they cannot happen? They don't happen. You can observe scientifically that dogs never morph into cats, monkeys, or people. If you believe you are descended from an ape like monkeyish pimate orangutan chimp mix hybridized with Neanderthals to produce your grandma, you're s sucker.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Larger changes do not happen. What do you mean explain why they cannot happen? They don't happen. There is no reason that the process that changed a wolf into a chihuahua couldnt also change a homo erectus into a homosapien. Or a habilus into a homoerectus. There are just as similar.You can observe scientifically that dogs never morph into cats, monkeys, or peopleThat has got to be the winner. Its official. That is the stupidest thing you have ever said.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Its a series of bones from multiple regions across the globe that show the stages of change between a wolf and a dog. It isnt in cartoons nor a book (like the Bible!!!?!?!?!?!).
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You don't need a series of bones from all over the world to show wolves being selectively bred to produce domesticated dogs. It's history. It's factual history, and wolves and dogs are the same animal. You can observe and study the breeding of dogs scientifically, you can show it, you can repeat it. You can capture wolves yourself and selectively breed them into dogs....your children might have to carry on the work as the wolves might not change fast enough for you to see how doggy they are in your lifetime, but it's observable and true science. You cannot do that with any kind of primate to selectively breed it to get people. It does not happen, never happened, never will happen. You can observe scientifically that it does not happen. If you believe it does, you don't care about science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

's factual history, and wolves and dogs are the same animal. You can observe and study the breeding of dogs scientifically, you can show it, you can repeat itHow can you repeat it? I have never seen a wolf change into a dog. Where is your proof? I went to the zoo the other day and saw a wolf. Guess what? It wasnt turning into a dog. How do you explain that eh? Selective breeding nonsense believer!!ou can capture wolves yourself and selectively breed them into dogs....your children might have to carry on the work as the wolves might not change fast enough for you to see how doggy they are in your lifetime, but it's observable and true science.If has a homoerectus, and millions of years, you could also see how it evolves into a human. The evidence is quite strong.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

to show animals morphing into different kinds of animals, you have to use cartoon animations.Erm.. have you read the Bible? It reads like a incredibly fairy story. Wolves can be bred to produce dogs, zebras and horses can interbreed..........Wolves, horses, and foxes are observable animals. They do not change into monkeys.Can you explain how John the Baptist turned into Jesus and parted the red see?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

It reads like history and prophecy. You read like a fairy .
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Right.. so you think the Bible is well written thats why its beleiver able? All the thees and thous I suppose. I guess thats why you spout that nonsense about your ye olde English translation of the Bible being the only decent one. I guess the tower of Babbel wouldnt sound so good if it was written like:"one day there were these peeps that wanted to build this right grand tower to see god but this god guy got proper mad at them all steamed up like and made them all speak different language and thats how we have English and french and negro talk."Sounds like a load of bullshit right? Well.. thats because it is.. no matter how you write it.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

The Bible is the Word of God. I believe God before I believe you. You can believe yourself all the way to Hell if you want to, and you can even believe yourself while you fry like an eternal sausage. You want a reality void of anything good from God, Hell is that reality and you are asking for it and can you blame God for giving you the reality you want? Well I suppose you can, but it won't get you out of the fire.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

. You can believe yourself all the way to Hell if you want to, and you can even believe yourself while you fry like an eternal sausage.Serious, have you seen the ISIS videos? I think you'd like them you sadistic cunt.l the way to Hell if you want to, and you can even believe yourself while you fry like an eternal sausage. You want a reality void of anything good from God, Hell is that reality and you are asking for it and can you blame God for giving you the reality you want?If God isnt real then neither is hell. Shit for brains.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

It reads like history and prophecy. You read like a fairy.Can you explain how you turned into a woman, and then turned back into a man, and got mad at God over your predicament and you expect God to not leave you in Hell forever? .
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

That's not science.Yep - it is. and we can use it to make predictions - ref
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

That is not a mutation, it is an adaptation triggered by environmental stress.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I'm not sure you have ever said anything that was actually true.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

He can't even get easy stuff true. Most people are at least able to get right their own actions, but he can't even do that.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

oh, it's you...........so I won't bother reading whatever it is you are trying to say. It's kind of like how God will view you when your name is forgotten in Hell after God is finally fed up with your stupid arguments where the living can be disrupted by them
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

That's really great. Even when you are ignoring me you're proving my point. Acting like you think you're God again.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I check responses to my arguments and I see the faces of five fools who think they have the right to exist outside of Hell and I"m leaving them in the dust, I tried to tell them how they can be saved but they think they are better than God........idiots.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You never cease to show that you know nothing of the topic.Define mutation...
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You are a mutation. Sin in your genes makes you act like a devil.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So, did you look it up and find that you're wrong and then change the topic, or do you just know better than to even try?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

changes in genetic expression triggered by environment are not mutations, it's adaptation. Evolutionists are always trying to stretch definitions.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

How dumb that is will immediately become apparent as soon as you look up what a mutation is.Please provide the definition of mutation...
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You are a mutation, a degradation down from what God intended you to be. Because of your mutation, sin, you are dying and on your way to Hell. Now do you understand?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Your genes are mutated so you are dying, the mutation is caused by the corruption of sin, and if you don't get saved you will wake up in Hell. Believing in evolution won't get you out of it. You are not evolving, you have fallen and are falling apart. You're only fooling yourself to think you are strong in your mind by ruling out God who is your only hope of avoiding Hell.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

why is evolution so important for you? Do you think it assures you life outside of Hell? That's it, isn't it? You believe in evolution because as long as you can tell yourself it's real, you can feel like you are exempt from eternal condemnation, so dying is nothing and you are excused from being who you are? Is that it? Is that your hope which causes you to desperately cling to belief in evolution?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Evolution is important because I am a scientist and it is a part of my field is study. It is also important to know where we came from.Hell? I literally could not care less about hell. Since it does not exist, it means as much to me as does Valhalla or Narnia or mount Olympus.Same deal with your sky god, Saint. He does. Not. Exist. To. Me.No more than Thor or Satan or Santa Claus.I exist. They do not. I have the right to exist since science and reality prove I do.Your gods? Not so much.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I don't see why it is important to believe we came from dirt or soup without purpose. Can you explain why it is important to believe that?And again, if Narnia or Valhaila is a real place, who really cares? It's only Hell that is important for you to deny. The same with Santa Clause and unicorns...who cares if they are real? It's only God you really want to be void.......God and Hell, can't have those. Unicorns, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Narnia, those are no problem if they are real.According to evolution, you do not exist, you only appear to be a person but in reality are only a fizz of chemicals with no real purpose, meaning, or value. That's why in evolution it is no big deal if you were killed inside your mothers womb....it never really was you and it's really not you now. Why people think it is important to believe in evolution is an amazing thing indeed.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Have you ever been vaccinated?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You really don't believe in God do you? How long have you been pretending. Anyone who treats a question as benign as mine like that is clearly pretending to believe in God.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Hey Boob, let me tell you a Boobhemian joke:This idiot had a sister and a mother who aborted their babies after their loverboys forgot to use condoms. One of the boyfriends was named Boyhomoman. He was Bobs lover and they dreamed of riding a horse to Jupiter. Jupiter said no women are allowed there, so they read the Koran together trying to learn about Islam. Then they found many times in the Koran that Muhammed says they are supposed to kill Christians, Jews, and Homos. Since they hated the Bible and Christians and God, and they didn't want to say homos are perverts, and their women were too loose to depend on, they decided to sell their souls to evolution in hope of escaping reality in death, and they both went out in a suicide pact and woke up in Hell. Oops, that's not funny. It was supposed to be a joke, sorry. I see no humor in you fools.22hrs ago, figured out why you hate me so much....it's because I speak against sin and you love perversion.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

No, we hate you because you don't debate on a website called CreateDebate. We came here to engage in discussions. You came here to pretend to believe in God.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

You like to copy and paste arguments you agree with. Looks like you are admitting that Amarel is right about you.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Of all the things that have caused your head to explode, asking about vaccinations was one of the simplest. When you regain your composure, just realize that vaccinations causes your head to explode for a good reason.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Hey Fartman, why do you look like a fat little christmas tree?.......and why are you so cranky?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Why would I be cranky about your head exploding? I guess it hasn't mended yet. Hope you get better soon. :)
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You should stop checking responses for a little while. You have been known to have your head explode with just one word, and you don't want to risk back to back head explosions.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Was that adaptation the result of a genetic change? A yes or no will suffice.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

I didn't mention an adaptation. You didn't mention an adaptation. How can I answer the question?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Saintnow is a waste of time to argue with. He is a creationist moron!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

LOL! These weak liberal debtors can't even answer a yes or no question. Evolution doesn't stand against scrutiny.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

hahahaha Punk.Was that adaptation the result of a genetic change? A yes or no will suffice.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

No. Genetics don't work that way. You can't just have a fish turn into a human. No matter how long you give it!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Oh the irony of the most deceptive idiot on this site calling other people deceptive idiots.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Who are you referring to exactly?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I didn't mention an adaptation. You didn't mention an adaptation. How can I answer the question?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Oh the irony of the most deceptive idiot on this site calling other people deceptive idiots.Evolution is a lie. Jesus Christ is the Truth. Science is study by observation of nature. Evolution isn't science.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Exactly! I can't see whats so hard to understand about that. I'm glad to see theres someone with common sense here. Too many people talking out of both sides of their mouths.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

I'm confused here.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

No, you don't. This has been demonstrated multiple times, not the least of which was you saying so yourself.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Do you think rejecting evolution will save you from hell?
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

No, idiot, only the Savior can save you from Hell. There are a lot of people on their way to Hell who do not believe in evolution.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

So your question should have never been asked.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Was that adaptation the result of a genetic change? A yes or no will suffice.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

How dumb that is will immediately become apparent as soon as you look up what a mutation is.Please provide the definition of mutation..........and try to do it before you wake up in Hell realizing evolution was a waste of time
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

You still haven't answered the question. Was that adaptation the result of a genetic change? A yes or no will suffice.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Funny you would say that.Your description of that sort of physiological adaptation...one caused by nurture and not nature..is a very controversial topic among us Biologists. That theory that it can even happen is called epigenetics. It is, btw, far from proven. I myself am a believer, and think that adapted traits can be obtained from both genetic mutation AND epigenetics.I am currently reading a book one the subject by my favorite science writer, Sam Kean, entitled The Violinist's Thumb.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

How dumb that is will immediately become apparent as soon as you look up what a mutation is.Please provide the definition of mutation...
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

Please provide the definition of mutation...Easy - you just take the opposite of what you said...You:"changes in genetic expression triggered by environment are not mutations"Reality:"A mutation is a change that occurs in our DNA sequence, either due to mistakes when the DNA is copied or as the result of environmental factors such as UV light and cigarette smoke."http://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-a-mutation
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: Yes

When I post a link to a one-page magazine article - you say "What are you saying? a link is not an argument! I don't respond to links, they are to support arguments!"But you can post a 2+ hour video and suddenly the same no longer applies??
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

It's there to listen to. I recapped what it is about, in my point. it's your choice to listen to. If not be closed, find out after the rapture. You may have an opportunity then. Maybe as long as your not in the portions of population wiped out by the tribulation .
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Randomness did not create, you need information to make DNA.Evolution takes more faith in nothing and Randomness then faith needed for belief in God. At least you can prove God with common sense and reasoning. Evolution is ridiculous!If evolution were true we would have life forms sprouting out of nothing all day. What is it like hair dye, it stopped after it evolved so far because nothing is intelligent?And aside from changing properties for adaptation there is only things growing with an intelligent designer. Scientists putting together to make. That's still not random nothing!Look at the Giraffe. How did evolution work backward from a dead body? Their long neck getting water needs a valve that would necessitate it's survival. A valve it would be dead before knowing it needed. There are many animals that evolution could not be possible. Because of the process, unless you can evolve from dead and from nothing!
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Because you don't pull anything out that lend to credibility nor the point you are making. Links are supports. Not arguments.
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

DNA is a combination of code that is not mathematically possible in even a small sense. The creating of life is not possible without intelligent design. Every law in science tells evolution is not possible. The only ones who are foolish enough to buy it are basically science cooks. Take tomatoes sauce mozzarella and chicken and you can make chicken parmigian. So we throw things together by some knowledge and intelligence, and we unite them with the helping hand of a science chef, and wow it happens to grow together. So then let's pretend that can happen with no chef. And then call it evolution.And ignore math and all other science principles because we want to insult the Creator with random nothingness, which I'm pretty sure would not be a wise thought in the end..
Debate: Is Evolution Science?
Side: No

Why does Israel and God's Word and Jesus divide huge significant effects to everyone in the entire world, a mid point in half, like God is the center of the entire world, even the universe?The below shows something crazy, that in no way was in the hands of an old Jewish guy to control.We all know Jesus is so part of the destiny of the world that even TIME is divided by the knowledge of Him - A.D. and B.C.But this is found in the ancient texts hidden.The world and languages go from reading left to right or right to left. Most written languages were in process of developing. Like time, written language is directed like a directors chair perched in Jerusalem. All languages EAST of Jerusalem write Right to Left. All languages WEST of Jerusalem write Left to Right. We have this also - torh spelled reading in two directions in Hebrew. Backward and forward with YHWY in the middle. Are There Hidden Codesin the Biblical Text?The secrets of the Torah are revealed... in theskipping of the letters.Rabbi Moses Cordevaro, 16th centuryTorah Codes49 (72) letter sequences:• Genesis TORH - in Hebrew at a 49 letter interval pattern• Exodus TORH - in Hebrew at a 49 letter interval pattern• Leviticus ? YHWH in a 7 pattern, square root of 49• Numbers HROT - in Hebrew at a 49 letter interval pattern• Deuteronomy HROT - in Hebrew at a 49 letter interval pattern• Leviticus (in Intervals of 7) - YHWHThe Torah Always Points to YHWH!The Torah Codes• Weissmandel, H. M. D., Torath Hemed, 1958.• D. Michaelson, “Codes in the Torah,” B’OR HaTorah, Number 6, 1987.• D. Witzum, E. Rips, & Y. Rosenberg, “Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis,”Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statis-tics, August 1994.• J. B. Satinover, “Divine Authorship? Computerreveals startling word patterns,” Bible Review,