azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You sure did-------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I don't believe in a god but i've read the Bible and no matter how many times that I read "Thou shall not have sex with the same gender" I also read "God loves all his children." I'm Wiccan and I believe in a Goddess but all the same I believe that if there is a higher power, they love EVERYONE! Not just the straight, homophobic, good little Christain people.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

I'm WiccanLOL. I couldn't take you seriously anymore even if I tried.Have a good day cunt.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Why? Because I venture to be different and you just fade into the background of society because you're no different from 56% of the other people out there?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

They can love just as deeply as anyone else. People always say that they don't want gay marriage because they don't want to ruin marriage, but how does gay marriage hurt YOUR marriage?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

So, then I suppose the elderly, and infertile couples aren't capable of love either, considering your last argument.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

They've lost their ability to reproduce due to biological issues, not through choice or sexual orientation. Don't waste my time with stupid arguments like that.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I'll say this once: Homosexuality is NOT A CHOICE. Aside from this, I'm only pointing out flaws in your argument. It's not my fault if you are unclear.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

So you're telling me you HAVE to sodomise with other sodomites?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I'm not saying you have to do anything. All that I meant was that you should be free to "sodomize". Maybe it is a sin to be gay in Christianity, but it's also a sin to judge people. Isn't that the allmighty's job?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Firstly I'm not Christian.Secondly I hate it when idiots say gays are being judged. They're not being judged. People are only repeating what their religion is telling them. That's not judging.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

YOu shouldn't act on it because it is a sin and morally wrong, that is why. I don't think love is a factor I think its merely lust but what do I know?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

We're all human beings, we're all entitled to live our lives whever we're straight, bi, trans or gay. No one can change thatJust because YOU think it's a sin and morally wrong and A BOOK WRITTED HUNDREDS OF YEARS AGO BY HUMAN BEINGS say it is DOES NOT give you the right to take away any of our rights
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

For all we know, the Bible could have been written by an ancient frat boy to screw with future generations, thus I will disregard the sin bit. Being gay isn't morally wrong any more than being straight or bisexual is. Love is just as much a factor as it is for heterosexual people, but it's between two people of the same gender. As for the lust: Of course it comes into play. But you're telling me there are no straight people like this? That, my friend, is bullshit.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Incest-use a condom or get an abortion. problem solved. you really think the only reason its wrong is because of the deformed child?Do evil deeds need a tangible outcome to be considered evil? Pedophilia-i agree.Homosexuality- Read Incest argument...P.S i dont support abortions.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Here's one reason... why is paedophilia or incest wrong?Paedophilia and incest are abhorrent to our species because of our natural hatred of genetic disease and desire to protect our offspring. Our aversion to incest is likely an evolved trait, due to the greater longevity and viability of a purer gene-pool. Such a hypothesis is supported by the fact that incestuous reproduction proliferates genetic defects inherent to a particular ancestry. A case example would be the Jewish race, who have long practiced marriage strictly within the Jewish community.When debating the matter, I am unconcerned with morality in sexual relationships, beyond the moral right to sexual autonomy in post-pubescent persons.What gives homosexuals the right to marriage? (which is a religious thing)The great civil disabilities inflicted upon unmarried couples and their families, such as inheritance complications, insurance &c.Why are people so ignorant to think you have to act upon it.Why don't you decide not to act upon your (dubious) heterosexuality? You might spare posterity the plight of living in a world populated by your offspring.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You can still have an incestuous relationship and not have to reproduce. Kind of like a faggot.The great civil disabilities inflicted upon unmarried couples and their families, such as inheritance complications, insurance &c.So get over yourself and marry a woman. How hard is it?Why don't you decide not to act upon your (dubious) heterosexuality? You might spare posterity the plight of living in a world populated by your offspring.You're just jelous I can reproduce. Cocksucker.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You can still have an incestuous relationship and not have to reproduce. Kind of like a faggot.That is immaterial. The abhorrence is hard-wired.So get over yourself and marry a woman. How hard is it?It is not difficult to consent to a heterosexual marriage, provided one is a heterosexual. But why don't you consider how hard it would be for you (presumably) to marry a man? that is same dilemma you present homosexuals with. You're just jelous I can reproduce.I am not a homosexual, which is immaterial to my ability to reproduce.CocksuckerHow original. Have a golden star.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

That is immaterial. The abhorrence is hard-wired.You're an incestaphobe. Ignorant bigot. that is same dilemma you present homosexuals with.No it's not. Because hetrosexuality is NORMAL.I am not a homosexual,LOL WTF? BULLSHIT
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Homosexuality is normal, it is found throughout all of humans history so if you were to say what the would should be like homosexuals would be included because we have been here all the timeGet it into your head that just because you don't like someone doesn't mean you can make their life a misery, they do not deserve thatI can't believe you are actually comparing love to rapeLove is what you feelRape is forcing sex upon a non-consenting personHence homosexuals DO NOT rape each other because they are both consentHomosexuals can feel loveLove is found throughout ALL lifeCatsDogsDolphinsMonkeysHomosexual humansAND heterosexual humans
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

LOVE IS FOUND THROUGHOUT ALL LIFE?Cats can LOVE each other??Stupid rapist. You can't do your homo mind tricks on me. I'm not stupid like all these liberals who believe you're born gay and that you can't do anything about it.Explain how I'm making your life a misery? Taking the piss on the internet is making your life hell? What a retard.. you don't have a life if 10 minutes of my time is making it hell. Fucking faggot. Rapist. Dirty sodomite.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Mind tricks?Cats can love each other, my cats doMy cats love me and my familyHow in any way am I a rapist?You are born gay but it's nature bs nurtureIt's to do with your environment in the womb Nothing bad has happened to us for us to end up this wayAnd adding swear words into every sentences just shows me your lack of vocabularyIf you don't like homosexuals then don't get into arguments with them because you will always lose
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

We're talking about love. As in between a man and a woman. Not between family and friends. You and your fellow rapist might love each other the way a rapist loves to rape women, but you cannot love each other the way a man loves a woman.You're not born gay. Sorry to say. You can't sit there pointing your fingers at everyone. I guess that means people are also born as sociopaths. or born crazy. or born honest. etc.And adding swear words into every sentences just shows me your lack of vocabularyReally?If you don't like homosexuals then don't get into arguments with them because you will always loseLol you dirty little raping sodomite. I can't lose to a faggot.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

My boyfriend isn't a rapistI'm not a rapistWhat I feel for him is pure loveWhat he feels for me is pure loveAnyone can love anyoneIt's a human instinctJust because it's between two people of the same sex doesn't mean that it isn't loveI was born gay, I've always been a little bit gay until last year when I came to terms with my homosexualityWhy are you using rape of a man to a woman as a basis of your argument against homosexuals????Your not born with everything, things developHomosexuals are born that wayDid you choose to be straight? No. So neither do homosexualsYou will always lose, people like you always do, racists lose, chauvinists lose, homophobic's loseYou. Can. Not. Win. This. Argument. You are nothing but a piece of low life scum that gets his kicks from posting homophobic, discriminating comments on a debate websiteAnd see, no swear words, no words created to criminalize homosexualityIf I can use proper vocabulary at the age of 15 why can't you at a older age than me?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Pure love? Now you're just getting out of hand.Did you choose to be straight? No. So neither do homosexualsWeak. People are MEANT TO BE STRAIGHT. It's called REPRODUCTION. The CYCLE OF LIFE. You're NOT SUPPOSED TO CHOOSE TO BE STRAIGHT. You're BORN STRAIGHT.Your not born with everything, things developHomosexuals are born that wayPicking and choosing huh?And see, no swear words, no words created to criminalize homosexualityIf I can use proper vocabulary at the age of 15 why can't you at a older age than me?You must be proud. You're 15??? Lmfao you definitely don't know true love. Faggot.Dicksucker. You would love jail, full of your fellow rapists.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You still don't get a choice in your sexuality, it is thrusted upon you, you never get a sayHomosexuals don't have a choiceHeterosexuals don't have a choiceBut I do know true love, it's exactly what I feel for my boyfriend, and exactly what he feelsfor meWhy would I like jail? Why would I want to get raped????? In no way would j ever enjoy rape!And still, I'm 15 and have a much wider vocabulary than youThere are hundreds of homosexuals in the world more successful, smarter than you, better than you! These people haves life, great lifes. Much better than sitting in front of a computer screen and discriminating against human beings just. like. you (but better people of course)
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You're not supposed to have a choice LMAO. It's not a choice. It's a normality. It's like having 2 arms. You're telling me I should have a choice of having more or less arms? Heterosexuality is normality, it is what you're supposed to be. There is no choice involved. Homosexuality is a defect which can be corrected or grown into a full blown faggot. In your case your defect wasn't corrected and now you're a walking breathing homosexual.You don't know true love kid. Not even cause you're gay. You're too young to understand true love. Lol dickhead.I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who've done better and worse than me. Same goes for you sodomite.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Homosexuality can not be corrected, it is not a defect, an illness or a disease nor is it a choiceAnd just because I'm 15 doesn't mean I know true loveIf you hate us so much why are you taking time from your "perfect" life to debate to us???
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You don't know true love. Because you're 15. Because you're a sodomite.You're asking my why I take a few minutes a day to insult a group of people I don't like with hilarious results? Are you really??
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I may not know true love but I know love in generalLove is not something you can controlYou can not say what love isWho people can loveLove is different for everyoneAnyone can love anyoneA man can love a woman A woman can love a manThe exact same as a man can love a manAnd a woman can love a womanYou cannot deny them this, this is how they live their lifeNo two people feel the same love. It. Is. Different. For. Everyone. And. Anyone. Can. Feel. It. For. Anyone. Get that into your headHomosexuals can love one another the exact same as heterosexualsYou have no sayNo rightTo take this away
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

I haven't taken anything away. You're the one trying to take things away yourself. You're trying to call the relationship between two men the same as a relationship between a man and a woman. You're bastardising the word 'love' and twisting it to fit your image of fuckriness. I'm just telling you I don't agree with it.So go back to your disgusting twisted immoral world and understand that you're not equal.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

But we are equal. We're all around you. No wait, we're not equal, anyone who gets on the computer just to tell us homo/bisexuals that we're not good enough to live would be lesser than us. We're willing to live in your "normal" world but we refuse to conform to what we are NOT. And, no matter what you do you can't stop us from being what we are. Figure out that you're becoming a minority and that homosexuality is becoming the norm. Get over it.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Atleast admit there's something wrong with you. If you're willing to accept your defects or wrongs then I'm not the type to insult someone if they're man enough to own up to their mistakes. But you're not doing so.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

There is nothing wrong with meAnd what mistakes?You know nothing about my life
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

You know what? I admit it for all of us out there that there is something wrong with us. You wanna know what that is? We are being held back by you god damn homophobes. It wouldn't even matter if someone was straight and supported us...you guys would still just lump us all together. Who we are is not something we can help, we are born who we are. If that means we're gay or bi or anything that really isn't any of you're guys business. We get it, you don't agree with who we are. You don't like us because we are who we are. We understand this, it doesn't bother us, what bothers us is you keep discrimminating against us. What bothers us is the fact that you have too small a mind to realize that we (LGBT'S) are going to bring you homophobes down. I don't care how long it takes, but one day you are going to be answering to us some day. Who knows with the way our populations are going up we could be the president. It could happen sooner then you think. If you don't like us then you might wanna watch yourself.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

BORING. Fucking hell I hope you enjoyed that gay little speech of yours. Cause you're still a cockmuncher.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Cockmuncher? You do know we don't eat cock right... I really feel for you if you do
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Hush your mouth ass muncher----------------------------------------------
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Maybe next time when you decide to call a specific group of people out you should make it a little more interesting. Getting called a cockmuncher, fag, dirty sodomite, and really everything else is getting kinda old.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You forgot rapist. You're rapists too.--------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

Well obviously you don't pay attention much because I put what you've called us...not what we do instead of love. I'm not a rapist either. Any girl I've ever done anything with had definitley did not say no or else it wouldn't have happened.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

A relationship between a man and a woman is the same as that of a man and man or a woman and a womanHomosexual relationships have the same ethic as heterosexual relationshipsAm I twisting love? Can you twist love? No, because love is not a thing, it's not an object, it's a feeling
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

You're twisting the definition of love retard. A relationship between a man and a woman is not the same as that of a pair of faggots or dykes. Get it right.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

I am getting it right You are the one in the wrongYou are the minority hereYou are the one with an illnessIt is scientifically proven that homophobia creates new stresses on the brain, I've read the articleThe fact that you manage to work homophobic language into every sentence shows that me, a homosexual who you hate, has had a higher education than you
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

One, if, as you say, other animals can't love or care deeply or have emotions, then explain to me why some other species are homosexual or bisexual? It's actually about the same percent in all species.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

No it's not. Because hetrosexuality is NORMAL.Homosexuality is normal so far as nature's ability to conduct population control is concerned and we have many examples of this. But for the sake of argument, even if it weren't that makes no more of a compelling argument for the simple fact that what is "normal" is entirely socially constructed. Slavery was normal in 1702.Nor does it follow that a behavior being normal is always easy to adopt by those who do not already conduct such behavior.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

People need to realise that it is natural, it will always be here and no one can do anything about it
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: Against Homosexuality

Homosexuality is normal so far as nature's ability to conduct population control is concerned and we have many examples of this.So nature turns people gay when there's an unusually high number of humans? That actually kind of makes sense in a strange sort of way. Except you would expect more gays in Asian and African countries. Which there are less of.But for the sake of argument, even if it weren't that makes no more of a compelling argument for the simple fact that what is "normal" is entirely socially constructed. Slavery was normal in 1702.What kind of a bullshit argument is that? How does that relate to this?
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For sexual freedom

Homosexuality is normal so far as nature's ability to conduct population control is concerned and we have many examples of this.While it pains me to dispute you, this assertion always strikes me as a pseudoscientific attempt to provide justification where none is needed. It is impossible for homosexuality to be an evolved mechanism; organisms which do not reproduce (and if these homosexual organisms did reproduce, the mechanism would not be overly effective) cannot pass on genetic traits, as would be a necessary occurrence for homosexuality to be a form of population control.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

While it pains me to dispute you, this assertion always strikes me as a pseudoscientific attempt to provide justification where none is needed. It is impossible for homosexuality to be an evolved mechanism; organisms which do not reproduce (and if these homosexual organisms did reproduce, the mechanism would not be overly effective) cannot pass on genetic traits, as would be a necessary occurrence for homosexuality to be a form of population control.I don't think there is a "gay gene" per say, but rather a sexual disposition which is influenced by hormones. The genes which control hormones and/or sexuality can be passed on without the explicit expression of 'homosexuality'. Otherwise one might expect that from an evolutionary standpoint homosexuality should not exist.Now I will admit that the idea that homosexuality rose primarily as a means to control populations is still a bit speculative, but this does seem to be the outward affect.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

While I don't think it implies an effort by nature to curb population, there is the horny sister hypothesis that posits that a desire to sleep with males can be genetically passed from a mother to her children of either gender. It makes her sons more likely to be homosexual or bisexual, and it makes her daughters more likely to have more children than average, thereby 'making up' for any children the gay son will not have. This hypothesis was constructed in response to the fact that homosexuality appears to run in families, and that the female relatives of gay men tend to have more children. It does provide a model for how explicit homosexuality could be hereditary and still be present today, but it is problematic for explaining lesbians.In the past, I think homosexual individuals as part of a family group would probably have been beneficial for a population rather than detrimental. If an able-bodied adult has no children of their own, they are more likely to spend time and resources on existing children, probably their nieces and nephews, resulting in decreased mortality for children that carry some of their own genes. If there is a gay gene, it could very well have been preserved this way as well.
Debate: Homosexuality
Side: For Homosexuality

While I don't think it implies an effort by nature to curb population, there is the horny sister hypothesis that posits that a desire to sleep with males can be genetically passed from a mother to her children of either gender. It makes her sons more likely to be homosexual or bisexual, and it makes her daughters more likely to have more children than average, thereby 'making up' for any children the gay son will not have. This hypothesis was constructed in response to the fact that homosexuality appears to run in families, and that the female relatives of gay men tend to have more children. It does provide a model for how explicit homosexuality could be hereditary and still be present today, but it is problematic for explaining lesbians.Well, in a word, yes. Nature does not show effort, only effect. There are differing views on explaining homosexuality in the light of evolutionary theory. Is there a selective advantage of homosexuality or is homosexuality simply a side-affect of some adaptation? So to say that homosexuality is nature's population control is admittedly still a bit speculative. What we do know is that there does seem to be some genetic influence and that it is not entirely a social phenomena.In the past, I think homosexual individuals as part of a family group would probably have been beneficial for a population rather than detrimental. If an able-bodied adult has no children of their own, they are more likely to spend time and resources on existing children, probably their nieces and nephews, resulting in decreased mortality for children that carry some of their own genes. If there is a gay gene, it could very well have been preserved this way as well.Perhaps, but from a sociological perspective the social taboo regarding homosexuality would be quite difficult to explain. I won't disagree that having homosexuals in an archaic society would have advantages, but perhaps to the people of the time homosexuals have an overall negative influence. Then I am reminded of homosexual behavior in ancient Greece, Rome, and Japan that doesn't have the same taboo. So I can't really tell you. All I can say is that there is still a lot left to learn.