Debate: A fetus is just one phase of a human's life.
Side: True.

That's not name callingName calling: "abusive language or insults".I never thatI'm simply using your logic, in that you say that because I believed that a fetus was a baby, I must've thought that a baby was a fetus and so on.Man Fish ???It was a reference to your profile picture.Oh yes I forgot you don't understand EvoultionAnd you don't know how to spell evolution.What are you babbling on about ?That was you, idiot.You're anti EvolutionNo, I'm against people calling evolution a definite fact, at least right now.Why not consult a medical textbook ?Why don't you actually support your claims, instead of telling me to research your claim?As in me denying Evolution is fact.??Another typical bit of stupidity from youFunny how everything you can't argue against is "stupidity" or "gibberish".Oh I forgot you don't have them in trailer parksNo, we don't. We have front lawns and backyards, maybe you should escape from your liberal safe space and explore more then your "garden lawn".The argument is over from the offFrom the off?My defense is the fetus is alive. Now, for your rebuttal?So what ?So, you say the fetus isn't alive. How is it not alive if it needs nutrients? And, if you do think it's alive, what makes abortion different from infanticide? Other then, of course, infanticide occurring after the birth.Yes you admit it's immoral to prevent a potential human being bornI admit it's immoral to kill a human/potential human. Not whatever you just said.but it's fine to prevent a potential human being born by using contraceptionHow is the fetus created if the contraception works? Here's the line of progression, in case you needed a diagram:Use of contraception: Saucy stuff > Contraception > Mother doesn't become pregnant > fetus isn't created.Use of abortion: Saucy stuff > mother becomes pregnant > fetus is created > fetus is aborted; life ended.you're a two faced hypocriteSays Dermot. That's irony.Yes you're pro abortionAbortion = termination of pregnancyContraception = prevention of pregnancyHow can you not see the difference here?Denial now as wellI haven't denied anything, except for having denied anything.That's the only argument neededNo, that's just not true. You need arguments based on facts. I don't care about how you feel, I care about the stats to use to prove your arguments.It's not my choiceOkay.it's the individual's woman's choiceThe individual's woman's? To whom does the woman belong?Amazing , thank you for thatOkay, what's your point?So you're saying the man should have a choice but why should his choice be given equal consideration ?I'm saying the man and woman should have an equal choice on the matter.So you're fine with him making a choice but not the woman unless she's anti abortion?When did I say this? I'm fine with both of them making a choice, as long as their choices have equal consideration.You seem to want the man to have a choice but only if it's anti abortionWrong, yet again. Both parties should get an equal choice on the matter.It's not murder you clownI didn't say it was.no one is charged with murder for abortingWhat's your point? A lot of guys aren't charged with rape, that doesn't mean they didn't rape the girl.your government murders people " legally "The death penalty is legal in several states.I'm a humanist you foolNo, you aren't. Humanists "emphasize the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively" by definition, and when fetuses have the cells needed to define them as humans, you still think it's okay to kill them.I cannot comprehend the gibberish you typeAgain, saying something is "gibberish" isn't a defense.Same thing you idiotThen why did you criticize me for using the term "bodily rights"?that's merely your obsessionNo, it isn't.don't you guys invent a new gender every day ?I'm a conservative, so you're wrong again.who gets schooled in American law by a EuropeanFunny how you bring up Roe v. Wade. You know, all nine justices on that court were men. And yet, you say you don't think men should be able to decide the fate of women. Also, did you know that in that case, something called substantive due process was used? Where some rights can't be taken away, even through due process, and that was the reason for the ruling in Roe v. Wade.This is what happens when Luigi tries to take down an American with our own laws and court cases.I know your stupidity isn't helping you is it ?What gives you bodily integrity? I asked you a question, and you didn't answer.But abortion is legal in the states you prize clownOh, did I get a promotion?Just because something isn't illegal, doesn't mean it's legal. It wasn't illegal for Hitler to conquer Europe, but that didn't make it legal and he still did it.