azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

What a spun crock of bs. If it was taxed properly it would not be cheaper. It also is not going to be cheaper for those companies in the end. They are blind and shortsighted for sure. What about when their most profitable market vanishes into thin air and walks away from them for forever. Whether it be because all americans are broke and have to stop buying those products, or because social science reality finally kicks in and we give them what they earned. In reality those companies need to pay higher wages to people so that more people can afford to buy products from them more often. Products that come from the factories and facilities they have invested in. So their plan is a plan to fail. Because it is based on making their own products less and less affordable.  By that stupid, unsustainable plan poor Joe won't be buying the nice work boots, the gloves, the truck, the insurance, the clothes, the toys, the new game system, the meals out, the new china, the bigger TV, the computer, the Ipod, the pool, the tools, the beer, the steaks, the fishing rods, or the rifles next year. Instead he will be out with his old rifles looking for you.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

Poor jobless American Joe will instead be a prime candidate to join any real Revolution or Tea Party that comes along, voting only to overthrow the corrupt SOBs who made things like this. He will be working for Walmart at minimum wage 30 hours a week with no health insurance waiting for Obama to save him(yeah been one long azz wait ennit?), and stocking up on ammo one box at a time from his meager check for his 308 or 270 w scope, and scouring the internet into the wee hours during his many days and hours at home for the names and home addresses of the evil SOBs responsible....So keep it up Mr Stuck on yerself bigshot CEO, JP Morgan, Goldman Sucks, poliartician, lawyer, nuke or oil bigwig, see where how it ends for you! I want to be around to film it for you and future retards such as yourselves. I bet that video would go viral and sell like ice packs in hell, and since as you say customers drive the market, doesn't look too good for you lmao.....
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

Customer service is suffering in America because of outsourcing to foreign countries. They are reading from scripts about a subject they know nothing about. They don't listen to the responses to their script questions because they don't understand the subject matter at hand. Ergo, the customers are getting frustrated and their issue is not resolved without multiple phone calls that are using up their valuable time off, or worse from their job. This is a no win situation since entry level jobs for young adults are now hard to come by.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

The term "out sourcing" adds a negative adjective to what is sound economic practice. When manufacturing prices final goods for the market they must be competitive. American companies can be competitive using resources found all over the world. Labor or other resources need to be secured from all locations. When a competitive product is sold in America by an American company using labor or other resources gained from "out sourced" locations, Americans still win. The US economy has employed some Americans which is far better than not employing any Americans. If their company did not out-source, it would not be competitive and would go out of business.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

"Sound" economic practice? The only "sound" that I hear from this is the sound of all the disgruntled workers in the unemployment office around the corner from my house.Outsourcing is destroying American jobs and the economy. Look at the mess we're in currently thanks to outsourcing.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

Really? Can you provide some specific figures? I seem to remember that in 2003, the US experienced a net increase of jobs. 2003, when globalization was at its apex. I'm sure the figures for 2004, 2005 and 2006 are similar.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

The latest economic expansion has in fact been one of the worst recoveries known to man. Those figures you rattle off have something called 'ghost jobs' and are subject to the birth/death model.In the end, US job reports can be off by hundreds of thousands of jobs a month. And it's all because of the way the government attempts to report unemployment.Did you know that after a certain amount of time of being unemployed, you are taken off unemployment stats? Some estimate true unemployment at well over eight percent.That's not to say that this recovery had less jobs due to outsourcing. It was mainly due to Alan Greenspan trying to keep the economy out of recession and instead, blowing up the housing bubble.Let's hope Bernanke doesn't follow the Greenspan model.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

The same principles of capitalism - supply and demand - should be what guides our world economy and the thinking of Americans. If America doesn't keep itself competitive by outsourcing, we will lose in the long run because we won't be players or winners in the game of supply and demand. Isolating ourselves from the world economy by not outsourcing would be a major, major mistake representative of a country doomed to fail.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

I completely agree, and to add to your argument, Ricardian theory of competitive advantage supports this idea. If other countries have the competitive advantage (do the work more efficiently than in the US) then the US should allow them to do it, and specialize in other things that we are good at.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

What is America good at now? That realm is shrinking. We used to be great at innovating new technology, producing cars, airplanes, and other consumer products. That isn't the case anymore. All that stuff is getting produced overseas.We need skilled blue-collar labor here, because everybody is not suited for a highly-skilled job that requires a college degree that costs $100,000 to acquire. Not everyone possesses the skill or desire to be a financial investor who relies on stock market speculation to make money. There needs to be balance and diversity in the job market for people of all skill and educational levels for the market to sustain itself. Otherwise you're creating a dependent welfare class of unskilled workers that relies on a small class of super-elite wealthy for tax money, while effectively wiping out the employed middle class. Well, I guess another option is that you can open a liquor store or Mexican restaurant, provided you can raise the capital for it. Oh wait, I can't because I can't get a decent job that pays beyond subsistence wage without having a college degree. Then I might earn $15 an hour if I'm lucky and have tens of thousands of dollars in debt.It's a no-win situation for a displaced factory worker, and it's a total win for the guy with majority share in a large multinational conglomerate.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

Its a matter of perception. On the macro level its good for everyone. Improved efficiencies and global communication make a flat world (yes I've read that book). In the global market, we aren't concerned with the little stories of blue and white collar layoffs. I live in an area that has seen a lot of outsourcing, and its good in the long run. The selfish nature of the human spirit is what keeps those thinking thier job was important enough to stay in their town.Bitter irony, many companies are starting to insource (outsource to them) back to the US. All the foreign car companies are putting in new plants. Sorry Detroit, they're going to other parts of the country.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

Great point! Outsourcing overall is good for all companies and countries involved. It allocates resources efficiently and drives down costs.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

Good or bad for who? If you're talking about US then there are particular groups that it would negatively impact while others positively. If you're talking about foreign countries then it would also be good since they benefit by earning return for their labour.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

One day the world will consist of one market. This is just the beginning and the people reluctant to change are the ignorant people who presume outsourcing is bad.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

The outsourcing of software development and remote teams can be both beneficial and detrimental for businesses depending on their individual needs. The primary benefit is that it can be a cost-effective way to increase capabilities. By outsourcing certain tasks, businesses can focus on their core competencies and delegate the less important tasks to external parties. In addition, remote teams can bring together the best talent from around the world, which can give companies access to unique skills and expertise. On the other hand, there are also some risks and drawbacks associated with outsourcing software development and remote teams. For example, businesses often have to work with multiple third-party vendors, which can add complexity and can make it harder to maintain control. Furthermore, there can be communication and cultural differences that can cause misunderstandings, and companies may not have access to the same level of transparency that they have with an in-house team. Finally, companies may have to deal with the legal and regulatory challenges of working with an external team. Overall, outsourcing software development and remote teams can be a great solution for businesses if they are able to manage the associated risks and challenges. If a company is able to do so, then it can be a great way to access unique skills, increase capabilities, and access cost-effective solutions.Read more at https://procoders.tech/blog/managing-remote-development-teams-how-to/.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

It's good for the foreign countries!
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

As globalization takes place, this is completely natural. If offshore jobs are competitive with the US and cheaper, then US wage rates are clearly in disequilibrium with the rest of the world.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

Yeah. Pretty soon the U.S. can enjoy third world shithole status like the countries our money is going to.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

Good for them!Bad for us :(
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

Today in the world of globalization outsourcing either it's BPO or KPO both have become a viable part of economy.so one country can not fulfil desire ,demand and wishes it is self centered for exposure they have to take some steps ahead and thing farsighted no matter america outsouce it's jobs to another countries in these days because it gonna be beniffited in future for america itself because today it's their need to appoint those persons who value the job .They are following the one of management principle "right person at right job". so for if our country wants a better outcome outsourcing is not bad at all .moreover it is not only u.s who is outsoucing but countries like India which is predecting to be the world next power is outsourcing americans too so it is a give and take . if country will grow countries business will grow it 'll automatically generates jobs so it is situation of wait and watch.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

It's good because in order for people to develop new industries and therefore new jobs, we need to get rid of the old jobs. Primarily those that aren't efficient. The immediate effect of losing jobs may sound bad, but it leaves room for growth and development. Companies that are more suitable and productive will grow and survive while those that aren't won't. What's the use of producing buggy whips today? Why keep it around because it 'simply create jobs' We need to understand productivity and long term outcomes.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

In these days all types of business firms must have to maintain their data in to particular order but now days every business is busy to continue their data. Outsourcing services is the consent term for business world.Outsourcing make valuable contributions to business firms to increase profits, efficiency and operations with superior speed. Benefits of outsourcing services are many: • Superior Business Efficiency • Proficient Data Management • Time saving & high quality • Minimized Costing and Maximized ROI • Many in single service
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

It is obvious that you are either in business or a politician because I could not understand a word you said. There is one thing I did understand and that is you support outsourcing jobs. This country of ours is in a real jam, there is not enough jobs for people who need them. So what do the businesses who can make a difference do? They wrap the jobs up and tie them with a bow and ship them over seas. It is not done for a good cause it is so they can get cheap labor and the rich get richer and the poor are left searching for jobs that are not there to get. Jobs for Americans is not just good for the people who get the jobs it is good for the country. We have a family that don't need public assistance they contribute through their taxes and the goods and services they are now able to afford. Their children go to college so their children and their children's children are able to see their dreams come true. But when jobs are outsourced the only people to benefit are the companies. If you could see how these people in other countries are treated on the job it is no life at all. I have seen people who live at their work station because for them the cheapest flat in town is considered a luxury they cannot afford. Mothers are separated from their children who live in the village with grandparents. She can only see them once or twice a year because it is too expensive to travel. But for some children it is worse because their education is what they are taught by the people they work for. That puts the family structure on shaky ground. These only people who make money are the companies who pay their worker wages so cheap these wages they get are laughable. They are paid by the piece. They get something like fourteen cents a garment, it is anyone's guess what Americans pay for it. Anywhere from fourteen dollars to forty dollars. People who are forced to live in dorm rooms with fences not to keep people out but to keep people in. Outsourcing jobs is an American disgrace.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

To tell you the truth, all companies use some combination of in-house work and outsourcing. Regardless on your stand on outsourcing, at the end of the day, the results clearly show that this approach works. Business process outsourcing services are one of the leading business innovations. It has lead the economic force for the last 2 decades. Perhaps, if there may be the best alternative in doing customer service it could be depleted but it would be hard to put a stop to outsourcing.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

In my own experience, I've seen how offshore legal outsourcing actually creates more legal jobs in the West, rather than cutting them. Every time a deal is done, or a litigation is waged, because legal services are suddenly affordable, it means more work for the Western lawyers involved in supervision, editing, negotiating, and/or appearing in court. For example, a Fortune 100 company specifically requested that the legal research and analysis needed for a series of multi-million-dollar deals in the U.S. be done by Indian attorneys at a legal process outsourcing operation in India. This is a situation where, if not for the off-shore legal outsourcing option, no lawyers would have been hired, because typical Western legal fees would have made it prohibitive. The work would have been done either in-house, or not at all. Because the India team made it possible for the deals to happen, Western law firms ultimately got more business, handling the otherwise non-existent transactions.A similar phenomenon has happened in litigation, where corporate clients have chosen to defend themselves against meritless lawsuits, using both U.S. and Indian lawyers. The cases have been dismissed instead of settled, because of the successful teamwork among attorneys in the U.S. and India. Without legal outsourcing, there might have been no U.S. lawyers hired for any significant litigation work at all, because frivolous cases often are settled at the outset, just to avoid the usual U.S. litigation costs. The off-shore outsourcing of legal work is leading to a new breed of benign tort reform, as defendants facing bogus or inflated tort claims are choosing to litigate and win. This in turn discourages such claims. And the money that otherwise would be spent by defendants on nuisance payouts can be plowed by corporations right back into the U.S. economy.Russell Smithhttp://www.sddglobal.comhigh-end legal outsourcing
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

giving away jobs is bad because it it decreases our limited jobs
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

The principle of Occam's razor wins. The simplest argument is usually the most logical. Brilliant response.
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Bad

i told you everything i couldplease, leave me alonezdgsjzdsvxguk
Debate: Outsourcing of US jobs to foreign countries: Bad or Good?
Side: Good

Well, there is Outsourcing and there is OUTsourcing. dnadublin is an irish design studio with head offices in belo horizonte in brazil, same land mass, if you ever need a sofa, let me know, you can always drive down. =)
Debate: Customary Tipping
Side: Pay For Performance

I waited tables for eight years, and virtually all of my pay came from my customers. I was paid $3.09 an hour, not even close to enough to live on by itself. This is how it should be, it ensures that your table server is courteous and makes the attempt to be sure you're satisfied: there's much at stake for the servers if they're aiming for a tip.It also allows a level of recognition and merit pay that doesn't exist in a lot of minimum-wage jobs, which can keep morale higher and lower turnover in good workers for the owner. Bad servicepeople don't make enough, and they move on. Good ones stay and make good money. Speaking as a waitress, the incentive of the tip also gives the customer an advocate in the kitchen. I know if I bring a plate of food to you and it's cold or not properly prepared, my tip will suffer, so I'm going to lean on the cooks harder to do a good job.
Debate: Customary Tipping
Side: Oppose

Tips are a bonus. Relying on solely on tips means something is already wrong as bonuses are not always guaranteed. Aiming for a higher paying job instead of "aiming for a tip" would be ideal. Aiming for a tip means you are hoping or gambling that the customers gives you more money."Ensuring that your table server is courteous and makes the attempt to satisfy" That is a poor argument because if I wanted to ensure something, I would pay for it in advance. As a customer, if I wanted better service, I would pay for it "before" service is rendered, not tip you after for it. Think First class tickets, one pays in advance to ensure a better service and treatment, not after. Tipping or paying "after" for better service, only serves as a grade of how well the server performed and does not guarantee that a tip is always given nor better service provided."Level of recognition and merit pay" should be provided by your management not the customer. Customers should grade the service via comment cards. Managers should merit pay based on that.A waiter's and server's job is defined and are hired by the restauranteur's management. Customers do not hire the waiters. Customers should not pay the waiters, their management does. The diners therefore should not receive the burden in contributing anything beyond their already paid wages. Service is already a fundamental part of the establishment's business. The menu price is the contracted price between the diner and the establishment. Waiters should not be considered a middle man contracted out to serve the diner. The diner should not be obligated to pay an addition beyond the menu stated price especially if the service charge is already included. Therefore waiters should not expect a tip. This reinforces the legal transaction of trade as business model.
Debate: Customary Tipping
Side: support

i support it cause basically I tip for good service. makes them work harder.if they do a shitty job, they get a shitty tip.
Debate: Customary Tipping
Side: support

I think it's a good way to say thank you. and think about it: if you were working for hours serving people wouldn't you take the extra money ?
Debate: Customary Tipping
Side: Pay For Performance

I absolutely support customary tipping. I strongly support pay-for-performance compensation and customary tipping is a fantastic way that many societies have incorporated this into everyday life. I'm not so fond of mandatory tipping, though.Here is who I think its most important to tip:- Hairdressers- Servers- Parking Attendants- Airport Baggage Handlers (especially curbside check-in)- Bartenders (once, at the end of the night)Here is who I still tip, begrudgingly:- Taxi Drivers- Hotel Bellboys- Bartenders (on a per drink basis)- Curbside pick-up (at restaurants)
Debate: Customary Tipping
Side: Pay For Performance

I support customary tipping as a way to incentivize people to do a good job. At restaurants, I typically start at 20% as my customary tip, and then adjust upwards or downwards based on the service I receive. People who I think deserve tips the most:- Waiters / Waitresses- Furniture Movers- Hotel Baggage Handlers- Hotel Maids (especially if you leave a big mess)One thing that does bother me about tipping is when going to another country the tipping custom is always a bit uncomfortable. For example, on a recent trip to Barbados they include a 10% service charge on everything before they bring it to you. Is that supposed to be the tip? Am I supposed to add extra? I usually just added 10% more but who knows if that was the right thing to do or not?