azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

Honey, let me tell you a little something about mePlease, don't call me honey.And we are not at our best when we discriminate and devalue half of our society.That is an exaggeration. Women are not devalued. The main area that is targeted as discriminatory is the workforce, correct? Beyond that, sexism is a personal opinion and cannot be banned. There is no law in the US or EU that allows for employers to prefer one sex to another when it comes to employment. Also of interest is the Forbs list of billionaires, there you will see that the only woman on the list inherited her wealth from her late husband. I will not generalize based on this, but you can see where sexists base their argument that women are inferior in business.I love sexism because I have a small brain, among other thingsIf I made that 'I love Feminism because I have a large brain and small breasts', that would be regarded as sexist. It works both ways Ma'am.men are intellectually inferior? Egotistical? Says who?This Google search reveals many sites I would deem as sexist towards men, but do you see me starting a debate about it? Get over it, sexism happens on both sides, but men rarely complain about it, because we don't give a shit.I do not hold those opinions at all. But I do know that sexism exists and as a woman you have to deal with it.And what reason would you give for the existence of sexual discrimination, without holding men accountable? it's something to be spoken out AGAINST not FOR.In your opinion. I do not agree with sexism, but everybody has a right to an opinion. Removing somebody's right to an opinion is just another form of discrimination.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: Yes! Yes I am!

"That is an exaggeration. Women are not devalued."Then why is a woman pressured by society to change her name upon marriage but not a man? Sounds like patriarchy. And don't get me started on the image of the female body. Devalued doesn't even cover it. All women are, are things to look at that help around the house and make sons."Beyond that, sexism is a personal opinion and cannot be banned."Just as racism is a personal opinion and cannot be banned but it should not be tolerated. "Also of interest is the Forbs list of billionaires, there you will see that the only woman on the list inherited her wealth from her late husband. I will not generalize based on this, but you can see where sexists base their argument that women are inferior in business."You infer that women are inferior at something dominated by men for 6,000 years (because just 40 years ago women were allowed to enter the workforce)? Well that's misogynistic."I love sexism because I have a small brain, among other thingsIf I made that 'I love Feminism because I have a large brain and small breasts', that would be regarded as sexist."You really didn't have to add the last part about small breasts. Now you're just picking on someone you deem inferior to you and you're attempting to devalue them using things you think might hurt their dignity ("small brain" and "small breasts"). Why don't you do some research on the history of feminism? Maybe the sexist of men can finally win the right to vote or enter the workforce or not be criticized by his breast size by the opposite sex. "This Google search reveals many sites I would deem as sexist towards men, but do you see me starting a debate about it? Get over it, sexism happens on both sides, but men rarely complain about it, because we don't give a shit."Men also didn't have to face 6,000 years of patriarchy and oppression based on their sex, only achieving explicit freedom of sexism just 40 years ago, still fighting implicit sexism and some other forms of explicit sexism today. Would you like it if someone told you you were inferior because the only thing you were good at was lifting furniture? What if an entire society thought like that? What if the world thought like that? You don't know what it's like to feel like somehow you're less of a human being because you were born with a uterus."I do not agree with sexism, but everybody has a right to an opinion. Removing somebody's right to an opinion is just another form of discrimination."But that opinion hurts. It can create stereotypes. It is unwelcoming to an entire sex. That's half the human population. I have the right to be respected as an equal just as much as you do and my sex shouldn't get in the way of our friendship. I don't view you lesser than me just because you're a man and I expect the same respect in return. A misogynistic opinion destroys the representation of someone, where everything that person does is held accountable for their entire sex. It's a form of discrimination. It can lead to harassment. It can ultimately destroy everything humanity has worked so hard for.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

The Internet (with some small exceptions) is nothing but a joke and should not be taken seriously. A great majority of sexist remarks on the Internet are for humor, of which i am guilty of finding amusement in.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

I was going to say that intelligent, even enlightened folk, like those in CreateDebate, know that a woman's place is in the home barefoot, pregnant and making dinner..... but my wife is in the other room and I chickened out ;)
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

Sexism turns me on.-------------------------------------------------
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: Yes! Yes I am!

i hate you. i mean, i don't hate you, but that doesn't contribute anything.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: Yes! Yes I am!

I agree this doesn't add anything to the debate. It just tells us that the original poster is promiscuous and has a higher probability of contracting a STD.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

And I'm told to stop inflammatory accusations because it doesn't add to the debate???????
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: Yes! Yes I am!

You must not get a lot of ladies, then. -------------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

Meh.... I guess it depends on relativity...Some guys have a different girl everyday.. so compared to them i'm mediocre...Some guys have a different girl yearly... so compared to them i'm a playa.I'm in the middle... different girl every month.You make your choice.P.S. No I am not single for any dates before you ask.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: Yes! Yes I am!

Wow, your sex life is based on relativity? I assumed you were quick, but not THAT bad.
Debate: Are You As Sick of the Sexism on The Internet as I am?
Side: I love sexism!

ehhh?? ------------------------------
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I actually support marriage equality. "Gay marriage" doesn't exist anymore than "straight marriage". A marriage exists because two consenting adults seek a binding commitment, that will protect their loved ones.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I am for it. If two people want to get married, they have that right.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

When the age old definition of marriage becomes open to interpretation it no longer applies to just "two people". Where does that interpretation stop? What if four people decide to be married? What if I wish to marry my horse? If homosexuals decide to live together what's wrong with a "civil union"? I have reservations concerning a miniscule number of our population dictating a whole new concept of marriage.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Marriage is about love, not gender. Consenting adults have the right to get married.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

I suggest that you check the dictionary. Love isn't mentioned but gender is. Incidentally, my horse is a "consenting adult". Lastly, you did not bother to try and refute my opinion.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Fact: Marriage is about love, not gender. You do not have the right to force your religious beliefs on other people. Gays have the right to get married.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Where in my statements did I mention anything about religious beliefs? My opinion is based upon nature's design and the last time I checked that design was two opposing genders for the purpose of procreation. The concept of marriage between a man and woman is in nature's design to provide a stable environment for rearing the issue of that procreation. Homosexual marriage is an absurdity at best.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

The antigay position is a religious idea that should not dictate the law. Gays have the right to get married.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

My opinion is based upon nature's design and the last time I checked that design was two opposing genders for the purpose of procreation.So do you oppose the marriage of infertile couples?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Answer to your question: Of course not as long as they are of opposite genders. My question: Do you deny nature's design?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Do you deny the existence of homosexuality within nature?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Absolutely not. In my view homosexuality must be accepted but not celebrated. Case in point: I had a cousin who was homosexual (highly regarded within our family) he and his partner died, horribly, of AIDS.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

I had a cousin who was homosexual (highly regarded within our family) he and his partner died, horribly, of AIDS.Um, I know some straight people that died too. Does that mean we shouldn't allow heterosexual marriage?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I suggest that you check out the meaning of "sophistry" because that is your entire argument.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

His argument is not fallacious in any way. Your tried to point to AIDS as an argument against homosexuality (in a way), and he pointed out that AIDS is hardly unique to homosexuality and thus can not be legitimate used as a means to base said argument on.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

AIDS is hardly unique to homosexualityWhat's unique to homosexuality is a highly disproportionate rate of AIDS and Syphilis infections, when compared to the entire populations.According to a survey made by CDC in 2010, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among men who have sex with men (MSM) is more than 44 times that of other men and more than 40 times that of women.The rate of primary and secondary syphilis among MSM is more than 46 times that of other men and more than 71 times that of women, the analysis says.Source: http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/Newsroom/msmpressrelease.html  And these figures are currently on the rise, especially among young men. Thanks to the LGBT propaganda of "total harmlessness" of the gay lifestyle.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

What's unique to homosexuality is a highly disproportionate rate of AIDS and Syphilis infections, when compared to the entire populations.Yes, which is why safe-sex education needs to be worked on within the LGBT community. And these figures are currently on the rise, especially among young men. Thanks to the LGBT propaganda of "total harmlessness" of the gay lifestyle.First, there is no lifestyle. Second, even the orientation is harmless. Third, sex without protection is unsafe, be it heterosexual or homosexual.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Well, that was what your argument was. You made an argument against gay marriage by pointing to AIDS. Would you like to elaborate on your argument? Because my 'sophmoric' counter used the same logic that your argument did.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

First, same-sex marriage is not "celebrating" homosexuality.Second, more heterosexuals die every year from AIDS than homosexuals. The need to spread better sex education is not unique to homosexuality, nor is the disease in question.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Homosexual marriage, homosexual pride parades ad nauseum, is celebrating homosexuality.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

How does granting homosexuals the same civil and constitutional rights as every other citizen celebrate homosexual?As for the parades, if they want to do so, they can. Neither you nor I need to attend.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Do you deny nature's design?Well, nature has designed those people to be unable to make children. And yet you support their marriage. Nature has also clearly designed homosexuals to be attracted to people of the same sex. And also, if you support marriage of any kind, you are denying nature's design. Marriage is man-made and as such, unnatural. Nature has 'designed' male's to have pleasure centers in their bottoms. What is your explanation for that? Nature also did not design computers or the Constitution or clothing or religion, and yet you take part in all of these.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

You are ignoring one salient fact. The design of nature is two opposing genders. The fact that anomalies exist in nature in no way refutes that prime feature of the design. It is unfortunate that some people must bear the onus of homosexuality but they are no less human. The fact of homosexuality must be accepted, but that is no reason it must be celebrated.If nature designed "males to have pleasure in their bottoms" kindly explain our aversion to colonoscopies.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Well, first of all, even if homosexuality was against the 'design of nature' how could that possibly affect whether or not homosexuals should be allowed to be married? Marriage is unnatural, as it is man-made. Why does it have to follow nature's design? And beyond that, can you explain why two opposing genders is the one and only design of nature? The fact of homosexuality must be accepted, but that is no reason it must be celebrated.But it is a reason to discriminate against them? Giving homosexuals the ability to be married is not 'celebrating' homosexuality any more than freeing the slaves was 'celebrating' black culture.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Fact: your raping is still wrong (and illegal) if you are married to the victim
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Reported for abuse. I will be calling a ;awyer tommorrow to discuss my legal rights.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

What did your lawyer say?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

When the age old definition of marriage becomes open to interpretationIt always has been. Marriage and it's definition has never been static.What if four people decide to be married?What's wrong with that?What if I wish to marry my horse?The typical illogical response. Horses can not consent to either a contract or to sex. If homosexuals decide to live together what's wrong with a "civil union"? I have reservations concerning a miniscule number of our population dictating a whole new concept of marriage.And the rest of us have issues with people like you wanting to deny them their civil and Constitutional rights by forcing them into a "separate but equal" based off of "reservations". The same "reservations" kept couples like me and my wife from being married, because of "reservations" about the races intermingling.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

I sincerely hope that now you and your wife are married.The definition of marriage never included people of the same sex being married.Every time I ask my horse if she wants to marry me she nods her head. That is about as illogical as people of the same sex being married.Finally, the last time I read the Constitution there was no reference to marriage. You are attempting to defend an absurdity.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

The definition of marriage never included people of the same sex being married.And before hand it didn't include people of different races being married. That is not a legitimate argument.Every time I ask my horse if she wants to marry me she nods her head. That is about as illogical as people of the same sex being married.Do you know what consent is? If so, then how can you justify that comparison?Finally, the last time I read the Constitution there was no reference to marriage. You are attempting to defend an absurdity.Loving v. Virginia established marriage as a civil right, one that has been upheld via the Due Process and Equal Protections Clause dozens of times via our legal system, including the Supreme Court on a number of occasions.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

What if four people decide to be married?Well, they would all four have to consent to it, which, as we know from human psychology doesn't work due to human jealousy and a few other obstacles. What if I wish to marry my horse?Legally, your horse cannot give consent. If homosexuals decide to live together what's wrong with a "civil union"?By denying them marriage, you are denying them all the benefits of marriage. You are also telling them that they are inferior to those who can get married. I have reservations concerning a miniscule number of our population dictating a whole new concept of marriage.First of all, those who are not heterosexual make up more than a minuscule number of our a population. Second, the 'concept' of marriage is not changed.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

Reply to first comment. I agree.Reply to second comment. Prove it.Reply to third comment. Civil unions provide all of the legal privileges of marriage.Reply to third comment. Three percent is a miniscule amount of anything. The concept of marriage is a union of one man and one woman.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

The last sentence should read: Reply to fourth comment. xxxxx
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Reply to first comment. I agree.Ok, so that's one place where homosexuality differs from your original argument. Reply to second comment. Prove it.Proof that animals cannot legally give consent? Well, here's the legal definition of consent. Also, in modern day courts, animals are considered to lack moral agency, and as such are not tried as or treated as humans. Reply to third comment. Civil unions provide all of the legal privileges of marriage.A civil union omits federal protection for the couple. Also, if you are willing to give the same legal privileges to gay couples, why deny them the same term that you provide straight couples? Three percent is a miniscule amount of anything.Well, even if the 3% number is correct, that would imply that there are nine and a half million homosexuals living in the US alone. That's hardly insignificant.And I said 'if' the number was correct because honestly, it's doubtful. Those numbers are self-reported from a generation that grew up under the idea that it horrendous to be anything other than straight. Studies range from 2% to even 10 or 20% of the population being something other than heterosexual. As we enter a society where it is generally more accepted to explore sexuality and be more open with relationships, why continue to deny these people's acceptance legally? Especially based on studies of people who grew up in an environment where 'devient' sexuality was stifled and shunned. The concept of marriage is a union of one man and one woman.Says who? In general, the concept of marriage is the bonding of two people that establishes rights and obligations between them and their families and provides legal benefits.And even if thousands of years ago and for a long time after that marriage was only between a man in a women, what is the flaw you see in changing anything?
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Reply to second comment. Prove it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent(criminallaw)Reply to third comment. Civil unions provide all of the legal privileges of marriage.They actually don't, nor do they provide the same rights, civil and constitutional.Three percent is a miniscule amount of anything.Irrelevant. We do not deny rights to a minority because they are a minority.The concept of marriage is a union of one man and one woman.Not anymore, actually, so that argument holds no water.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Just remove the "gender" question from the marriage license application.No body is "checking" anyway.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Why should straight people have to be the only ones following an archaic practice. Let the gay people be as miserable as most of us have been at one time or another. Actually, I don't think anyone should have to get married to be together. Maybe a renewable 10 or 20 year contract that is hard to get out of would be best. Married people shouldn't get special privileges or tax breaks.I heard once a long time ago, when divorce was becoming fashionable that if it was harder to get married and easier to divorce, than maybe people would choose more wisely.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I see no reason to forces churches to perform gay marriages as most governments let religions practice all sorts of discriminatory rituals.I see no reason for secular governments to deny marriage licenses to gay couples, since a marriage license is a secular bureaucratic tool. For religious governments, that depends entirely on the religion.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I'm for gay marriage because you cannot justify denying two people the ability to be united as one under love simply because their way of life is separate from yours, it doesn't hurt people and the only argument against it is from a 2000 year old book that is full of falsehoods
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

equality is a human rights issue.there should not even be a "gender" question on the marriage license form.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

Absolutely! Gay Marriage is now American as apple pie. It would be un-American to oppose it.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

I believe that marriage is a right for people, it doesn't depend on your sexual choices. Think about your first love, remember the skip in your heart the times you wanted to kiss him/her, could you controlled who to love? Of course not. Suppose that people were protesting against your love, because you want to spend rest of your life with that person. Therefore the Main problem with againts side is they can not empathize.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: Against

With Obama in charge I’m sure ISIS will settle that answer in do time. As for me I could care less. I feel if you're stupid enough to do it then go for it but in time it’s going to come back and bite you in the ass, but then you just might like that. LOL
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

What does President Obama have to do with this? The question is not about him. You stated you're "against", yet you proclaim, "..could care less....if you're stupid...". Clarify your argument please and focus on the topic.
Debate: Are you for or against gay marriage?
Side: For

getting married as a homosexual person doesn't make you any stupider as a person who believes that committing to the marriage will somehow come back to hurt the couple that gets married. provide some evidence that 2 homosexuals being married results in bad things every time.