azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Then your school's administration is a bunch of tards...
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

The tech department only wants to protect us from sites like face book and twitter and you tube so then we actually do what we are suppose to do and one question. If you are middle shook right now or high school or whatever does your school have MacBooks because right now in my middle school we do and that's probably why it's blocked and not on the older computers that are now gone.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

What does preventing accessing to social networking sites have to do with the reliability of Wikipedia?And yes, I am in high school (currently a sophomore). However, my school's administration is intelligent enough not to claim Wikipedia is inaccurate when they know nothing of the statistics.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Because in my middle school we do a LOT of reports and projects that involve computers and research so they restricted it because many people in my school know it is very inaccurate. If you got some scientific evidence that proves this statement wrong please let me know so then I can apologize to you. (you got about less than 1% of me apologizing to you even if you prove me wrong. Just saying)
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

because many people in my school know it is very inaccurate.Wikipedia isn't inaccurate, those people are idiots.If you got some scientific evidence that proves this statement wrong please let me know so then I can apologize to you. (you got about less than 1% of me apologizing to you even if you prove me wrong. Just saying)Why wouldn't you need scientific evidence to prove the validity of an online encylopedia?As for general evidence... Observe:http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.htmlhttp://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2005-12-14-nature-wiki_x.htmhttp://www.ecampusnews.com/technologies/study-suggests-wikipedia-is-accurate-â€¦-and-a-little-dull/http://www.switched.com/2010/06/04/wikipedia-is-accurate-but-not-very-easy- http://bpastudio.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/wikieval/ http://www.quakercampus.com/content/wikipedia-more-accurate-more-current-encyclopedia http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/01/study-wikipedia-actually-pretty-accurate-so-calm-down/
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Fine then you explain why many people in my grade get A's. Explain why then. I like to also see the scientific evidence too!
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Grades =/= IntelligenceAgain, I am not required to give you sort of scientific evidence. I HAVE given you evidence, however, and you refuse to acknowledge it.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

How about we just drop it and don't chat or whatever we are doing right now ever again unless something really stupid happens and we must hat or whatever to each other?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Meh. If you want to, feel free to stop responding. I quite enjoy lengthy DEBATES such at this one.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Do you even know what a brain tumor is? I mean what's the chance of me getting a brain tumor? Don't even answer that! I already know the chances so dont even say anything.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Do you even know what a brain tumor is?YesI mean what's the chance of me getting a brain tumor?DunnoI already know the chances so dont even say anything.What are they?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Less than 1% but as people get older the risk increases. I have less than 1% at my ate but when I get a lot older my risk increases
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Cool, so if it happens I'd like to get you into my labs and we can run some studies to see if you can eat your way out of it.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I don't trust oh and if you haven't notice you are my enemy on here so the answer shall and always be no
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Dagnabbit, you're too clever.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Oh my god! That's the very first time I have been called clever. I know you were going to do something disturbing to me of I said yes and went over to your lab. I know guys are school who are like that. Very disturbing guys at my school. I'm not even pretty!!!! So why would you want to use me in your "lab"? I got stupid freckles and part of my hair is dyed ultra VOILET. I'm like the second fattest kid in school. There is a 7th grader who's fatter than I am by like maybe 50-70 lbs. (I'm in 8th grade just saying)
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

You sound far too overly self-conscious...
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

One more thing. I really really really really really don't care what I look like as long I get very good grades.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

All the better for you, then.Although, I'd suggest you strive for something more than just good grades. Intelligence is a marvelous thing.Everybody can acquire adequate grades.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

But that is all I have to keep me sane. Really! My good grades keeps me sane. That's all I have. I've got no friends, everybody hates me, all my family members hate me and I always get bullied because I'm fat and too smart for some people.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Can you tell that to Rylee Lonske that everybody can aquire adequate grades because everybody knows his grades and they are all F's and also tell that to Robby Aldrich who is currently repeating 7th grade.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

If you can bring them on Createdebate, I'll personally tell them they're idiots. XP
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Oh my god! That's the very first time I have been called clever.Relish it.I know you were going to do something disturbing to me of I said yes and went over to your lab.That was a joke as was everything else.I know guys are school who are like that.That perform scientific studies on people?Very disturbing guys at my school.Probably should change school.I'm not even pretty!!!! So why would you want to use me in your "lab"?What has how you look got to do with it. I was saying that seeing as you can eat your way to health you'd make an interesting case study.I got stupid freckles and part of my hair is dyed ultra VOILET. I'm like the second fattest kid in school. There is a 7th grader who's fatter than I am by like maybe 50-70 lbs. (I'm in 8th grade just saying)Although I don't know what age 8th graders are (I'm guessing 15) I can say this:If you feel this way about yourself then the only one that can change it is you, I was sixteen stone two years ago (225lb) so I know your plight.Freckles are cute, so don't worry about them and as for your hair, if you like it stick with it, you're young and trust me when I say this, you'll value your uniqueness more the older you get.If people insult you, you can do one of three things:1 You can get all butt-hurt about it and become more self involved.2 You can brush it off and remain unchanged3 You can use it to motivate you to becoming the person you think you are.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Sorry that's the first time somebody has ever given a compliment. I'm a serious person so I don't take jokes well no offense of course. The guys I meant they are stupid and like to make sexual jokes around people like me. I like my school because well I think there is this one guy who might actually be my first friend but I'm not really sure. He's not like the other guys though. Ummm... Ok I guess but I'm still being cautious! I'm Actaully 14 but I'm used to being called 15 or 16 and once 17. Of course I was called 17 when I was 12. My tue hair color is a dirty blonde and I Actaully almost stabbed one of the stupid guys at school for that with a pencil. I'm used to the insult so I just say ok in a positive way and make people confused and then when somebody asks why I'm not feeling bad or something like that I usually say I've been through this many times so it's not a big deal for me and I do know how to handle things. How is having a million freckles cute? I'm the only anti-social freckled freak at my school!
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I know you're young, but you need to lighten up, your teenage years feel long, but they'll be gone so quick. And as for freckles, I love themhttps://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSuC4rmroITZjViJcOH3ZgCHZ9erQrabuBtWPyuyd5QZtiCd4WNmg https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSSQqhlb70e1t7YhEP6acGHTEpnI4-qoa3xC6jFddut05ZylMpJ https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTOlGJoX0KPpX6kznvsx7Pm8qEowBMy1V9XF6_h3RuvvHHdhWo Stop feeling sorry for yourself and make some changes.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

I really hope by what you mean isn't what I'm thinking right now.....
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Better run =D-----------------------------------------------------------
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Wait do you mean I run or you running away because I'm fat and ugly? Really which one is it or is it both?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

And that would be?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Well. We can't use people, can't we? Animals work just fine, it's a bit cruel but that's the only way.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

No way when we have prisons full of people we can use. The prisoners choose to be there, animals don't have that capacity.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Prisoners do not choose to be in prison.Unless all the Christians in the USSR chose to be in the Gulags.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Yes they do, they know the law, and while i am not fond of the law, a criminal knows it is breaking the law on purpose and thus choosing to risk imprisonment
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Yeah, like worshiping Christ in the USSR was illegal. If you got caught with Christian memorabilia, you were imprisoned. And the Gulags forced harsh labor that caused many to die... much like the Holocaust, and much more casualties. I don't know of science experiments, though. But the Holocaust was a case of that, and ideologues went there too.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

lol ok i didnt know we were talking about war prisoners, the law is inadequate
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

First of all, the USSR doesn't even exist anymore .
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Doesn't change that imprisonment is not a choice.-------------------------------------------------
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Imprisonment is a choice when you end up there by committing a crime, such as murder, theft, drugs, etc. There is always going to be political type prisoners, but even they have a choice. Just because some one refuses to conform, doesn't mean they don't have a choice. One always has a choice.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

So to you it's justified to experiment on involuntary prisoners, even if they're put their for the simplest of reasons such as being a Christian?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

First off, talk about an oxymoron; involuntary prisoner. I'm betting that involuntary prisoner is also a model prisoner as well. Who pays for prisoners room and board? How they earn their keep is of no concern of mine, as long as they earn their keep.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

so you DO think it would be justified to put Christians and Jews through experimentation on the basis that they're prisoners and it's their choice.gotcha.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Of course it is fair. But is it right ?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

I didn't ask if it was fair, even though you have no argument to say otherwise.I pointed out how you believe it to be justified.Do you not?
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Does even matter the USSR even exist anymore? Remember that mistake may happen again in the future. That's why people study history to learn from the mistakes and make sure it never happens again unless someone thinks it's a great idea and does again.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

NO way! Animals are not ours to do with what we like. If there was some superior being (aliens?) among us, would it be okay for them to experiment on us? Of course not! Horrific experiments have been performed and animals and continue to be. If you knew what abounds in private labs, you would be horrified. Did you know that experimentation labs routinely get dogs from "pounds" and use them? I know of one true story about a beautiful Collie that was experimented upon. His spleen was twisted, on purpose, to see what the outcome would be. He was sewn back up (twisted spleen and all) and awakened alone and in pain. The next morning, the dog was found on the floor, in a puddle of his own blood; his sutures had torn open. He was given too much IV fluid, hence, the bursting open of his wound. Although the dog was near death, he wagged his tail in greeting to his abusers. Without emotion from the humans, the dog was promptly euthanized. This is just ONE story. There are many, many disturbing stories of animal experimentation. All are wrong. All are horrific.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Men have no natural domain over animals. We have given it to ourselves through arrogance and religion. How is it ethical to raise and hurt animals in unnatural environments? Yes, it helps human beings, but why is helping humans more important than helping animals that are endangered? They are most likely endangered because of humans destruction of the earth..It is unethical, but it is counterintuitive for the human obsessions: Convenience and Longevity. This argument is invalid to people who think that critical thinking entitles us to do whatever we want.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

Yes, it is a bit frightening, but not all animal experiments are for the benefits of humans.Many times it's actually to help other animals.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

help other animals?ahhahaha, yeah only help them from human's destructive influenceanimals have been fine for all of earth's history
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: Yes

All of earths history, appart from the bit we came in. ( I meant to cli8ck clarify...)
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

There are animal dieseases that scientists are trying to find cures. Do not be mean to others opinions if you do not like them. If you got nothing nice to say then don't say anything for you may have hurt somebody's feelings.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

When dolphins or whatever species will take over for us, we wouldn't be so pro-scientific experimentation. Never forget this world is a present, which we are nothing but a part of. Respecting it, would turn ourselves into humans. We would never be called homo consumens again, as we, unfortunately, are nowadays.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Give me $150 bucks an hour and I'll try out your drugs and cuddle with your then rescued puppies and kittens, drug companies.
Debate: Should animals be used for scientific experimentation?
Side: No

Animals may suffer during scientific experimentation and I see it as a form of animal cruelty.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

Absolutely. Causing harm to a sentient being is fun or fulfilling? That's absurd.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: No

There is ABSOLUTELY ZERO evidence that animals are sentient. In face all evidence we have suggest the opposite. Just because some of them look like us doesn't mean they are self aware.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

That is very, very wrong. That is so absolutely and unbelievably wrong. An animal is sentient if it can feel or perceive things.Non-human animals can feel pain, fear, joy, anxiety, anger, even jealousy! As for animals that are self-aware, we know that humans are self-aware, as well as apes, dolphins, and elephants (all of which can recognize themselves in a mirror).
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: No

This is not sentience. A robot can perceive things, and some can recognize themselves in mirrors. that does not make them self aware. And you have provided no evidence that the "emotions" you claim animals can feel are no more than primitive survival instincts. give a source next time. opinions don't make arguments.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

They're not my opinions, love. They're facts. I'll give you just a few examples of higher thinking and emotions in non-humans.Orangutans will often climb a dead tree, destablize it as it begins to fall, and scream with excitement as they plummet to the ground, jumping onto nearby trees or vines seconds before the tree hits the earth.Chickens are very social birds, as intelligent as dogs, cats, and even primates. Mother hens will cluck to their brood while they are still within the egg, and the chicks will chirp in response to her and to the others.Cows are clever animals that have been known to go to great lengths to escape from slaughterhouses. Within a herd, they develop complex relationships, much like dogs in a pack. On dairy farms and cattle ranches, cows can be heard calling out for their calves for days after they've been separated.Fish have memories and the ability to learn, and are known to feel fear and to fear the anticipation of pain. They can communicate with sound (inaudible to humans) when they are in distress.Pigs are considered smarter than three-year-old humans. They are naturally very clean, loyal, and friendly.Turkeys love having their feathers stroked and to listen to music, to which they'll often sing along to quite loudly.Geese mate in pairs for life and grieve for considerable amounts of time if their mate for any reason disappears.More and more scientists are agreeing that animals are conscious and can feel basic human emotions, such as happiness, sadness, boredom, and depression. Some of these scientists do agree that, yes, animals can feel even higher emotions, such as jealousy, love, and spite.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: YES

i say NO because hunting is nit just a sport some people hunt to feed their families
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

Killing other sentient beings just for fun is barbaric. It shows our lack of compassion and perhaps reflects the way we cherish other human beings too.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: No

You misunderstand the word sentient (or you're just a nut). the definition of sentient is "Having the ability to think, feel, and perceive subjectively". Animals do not have this higher consciousness. Just because the emulate human behaviors does not make them sentient.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

Yes, killing animals for fun is cruel. It also worries me when I am around people who take so much pleasure in killing things. First its starts at animals, usually it will stay there, but then again maybe it will go to humans. What about if someone, who was a little twisted, went hunting and they accidentally or purposely killed your pet such as your dog or horse? I doubt you would respond, "Hey at least you had fun." A person who takes pleasure in such dominating power because they are able, as in killing a "lesser" creature, is not someone I would respect.I'm not sure about fishing for sport. It looks like it could be painful to the fish. I mean if someone stuck a hook in your cheek it would be painful, but its ok because it would heal. If all the other sports that kill or seriously harm animals were banned except sport fishing i would be happy enough.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

I completely agree with your argument, except...if someone stuck a hook in your cheek it would be painful, but its ok because it would healWait. So because it'll heal, that makes it alright? Or what? I'm confused.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

I was being sarcastic in response to dallowar's argument: "In a great majority of cases you can catch a fish and release it without serious or long lasting harm".I took that as meaning that it is ok to do harm to something as long as it's not fatal or long lasting. So i applied that logic to humans to point out how stupid i think it is.I probably should have commented under that post instead. However, i feel that a lot of people hold that belief and thus i wanted to comment on people in general instead of focus on dallowar.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

Ohh, I understand! Yes, thank you for clearing that up. I found it oddly unfitting with the rest of your argument. :)
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

Meh.. fishing I don't knowBut hunting is kinda fucked up. I'd like to hunt the people who go around hunting them. Then what would they say?
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

I'd like to hunt the people who go around hunting them. Then what would they say?As Jean-Claude Van Damme. He knows all about that.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: No

Murder:Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder). You are committing murder.Something that they DIDN'T do.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

IDC.. lol. That's not the point is it.The point is.. if they do something that causes needless pain and suffering for their own enjoyment.. then I should as well. FUCK WHAT THE LAW SAYS..
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: No

So you're an anarchist.Well, as an anarchist, I hope you can appreciate one's right to hunt animals then.
Debate: SHOULD ANY SPORT THAT INVOVES THE KILLING OF ANIMALS BE BANNED?
Side: yes

Noo.......... How did you get the THAT one?