azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

I still cant beleive you were brazen enough to repeat that drivvle, ive a great a deal about the conflict so i cannot beleive you would come out with such a statement. Ill tell you what, go to south vietnam meet a random vietnamese man walking down the street and try to convince him that what you were doing during the war was to help the non-communist vietnamese, just try it, see what happens. Your fuckin unbeleivable, go educate your self on the war then come back and look at that statement again. Fuck me your unbeleivable, honestly i knew you were bad but seriously the most extreme neo-cons in your country would barely try to stand up for what was done to the people in vietnam, its one the blackest periods of your history when millions in your country (the ones with strong morals, awareness and a conscience) were so digusted by what was going on that they took to the streets, when even large portions of the army began to defect. You politicians dont like to talk of that conflict they sweeep it under the rug just like the massacre and genocide of native American Indian that marked the founding of your great nation.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

just like the massacre and genocide of native American IndianWhat do you mean? They are still around and they are thriving with their casinos ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

yes the remnants of their lost civilisation remains, look im tired of trying to explain any of these things to you, if your really interested in any of the thing ive been saying you'll look it up for yourslef. If you want to know about the massacre of the entire Indian people read "I buried my heart at wounded knee" very depressing book but also eye opening, you i still think your country hasnt come to terms with what went on then.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

What are you talking about  the remnants of their lost civilisation do you want them to still be around with their little bows and arrows hunting buffalo? They have evolved! Just as we have evolved. You don't see us driving in a horse and carriage, do you? Why aren't you lamenting the "remnants" of our lost civilization? Man! You are so stupid I find it hard to believe you are a scientist... but then again, maybe you are what passes as a scientist in Europe. I'm not at all surprised ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Your one twisted little man Joe, seriously, i cant get over how you can say what you just said. You have no idea what your talking about so im just gona leave this agrument at the door, if i try toexplain anything itll be a waste of my time.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

its comppletely self-interest in way that is extremely harmful to every other nationIf America is extremely harmful to every other nation on the planet.... ok, now see if you can follow this simple train of thought. I know that it will be a difficult concept for you to grasp, but amuse me and try...., WHY THE HELL DON"T EVERY OTHER NATION ON THE PLANET ATTACK THE U.S. of fucking A?
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

That was a gross generalisation Joe, you caught me, ok. Obviously Americas actions arent harmful to every country all the time and when they are harmful they not harmful to the people on top in those countries, like the economic warfare your country has been responsible for across the world has affected only the poorest in socitey, did you hear about how many people died in India (people on the poverty line of course) when the quantitve easing you economic princes on Wall Street iniated drove food prices up. what i saying this for, of course you didnt.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

did you hear about how many people died in India (people on the poverty line of course) when the quantitve easing you economic princes on Wall Street iniated drove food prices up.Oh wait..., I think I know this one..., the answer was in one of your other arguments...., one million! Right? ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

No it wasnt in onje my arguments, go look it up if you dont beleive me.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

What I meant was that one million seems to be a number you use a lot so I just figured I'd beat you to the punchline and declare the number so you won't have to ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Like what i find unbeleivable is that you claim what im saying is wrong but you refuse to find out for yourself. Yes i quoted the fuigure 1 million becasue thats the best estimate of how many people have died in Iraq as a direct result of the ivasion, i quoted 3 milion dead in vietnam because that is how many were killed in vietnam. Now what has happened in India and other isnt directly the fault of your goervbnemt or even your country for that matter (BTW the number that have strved is easi;y in the 10s of thousands,ok, look it up). Its the fault of the economic system and how its structureed. You the economic system operates on basis of maximising profits not feeding people. Sometimes these two things are aligned, sometimes there not and lots of people die, you hear about as statistics on some oxfam charity ad and think Jesus the world is fucked up, then you quickly change the channel to see how Charlie Sheen is gettin on never thinkin how these happen because you dont really have to deal with the consequences.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

what has happened in India and other isnt directly the fault of your goervbnemt or even your country for that matterYES! Finally! Something we are not being blamed for ;)BTW, do you know what our new pick up line here in the states is?"Hi. I'm a Japanese Nuclear Facility Technician. Would you like to see my spent fuel rod?" ;)OK, I guess that is insensitive but hell, I'm not Gottfried so I guess I don't have to do a public apology ;)Hey, you can rag on Charlie all you want but he still gets laid more than you ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I think he would say that you are an idiot for trying to put words in his mouth ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

I dont think so, i chose my words very carefully in that previous paragraph so that i was in keeping with his gernal philosophy so i dont think he'd disagree at all to be honest.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

What I'm telling you is that you are so fanatical that you have corrupted his words to fit your world view. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

What im telling you is that your more fanatical thaqn me and if you actually listened to him you may begin to realise that.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

And what I'm telling you is that you are more fanatical than me and I already know that if a fanatic loves someone it is because that someone supports their fanatical world view and so therefore I will consider that someone a fanatic and I would thus be wasting my time if I took the advice of one fanatic and listened to another fanatic. You people are nuts and you need medical and psychiatric attention. If you were an American you would be able to apply for our nationalized health care and get these treatments for free ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Powerful logic Joe, i mean how can possibly argue with on that. So, Noam Chomsky is a fanatic is he, because his views arent aligned with those of some narrow minded ignorant American, then why was he voted the greatest intellectual alive, why is probably one the most repected men in the world, why do so many of the most intelligent and conscientious people in the world revere him, why is he the 2nd most quoted author in history, why is he head of the linguistics and plilosophy department at probably the best college in the world. No, hes obviously a fanatic, the cia should open up a can of whoop ass on him, right Joe. I mean if hes sepaking out against the red, white and blue hes obviously a fanatic, i mean theres no other possible explanation. You'd perfecetly well into the world George Orwells constructed in 1984, do you know that.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Lol!No, the CIA should not open up a can of whoop as on his sorry ass. He is insignificant. If he was as well known as you claim, I would have heard about about him. No, he's only well know amongst liberals and socialists ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

No Joe you wouldnt have known about him, ive spoken about this before, the American population isnt exposed to anything that would be compeltely copunter intuitive to Maerican foreign policy, OK. If people were granted access to the truth the levelof dissent from moderates in partular would be astronomical.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

What are you talking about? We have Google. Hell...., we invented Google.... And the internet (look it up ;). If it weren't for the U.S., the rest of the world would still be throwing shit at each other. We are exposed to everything. We don't have a Chinese government to censor our internet. We have access to the truth. I have seen the truth and yours doesn't make sense. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Have you ever read any philosophy, ok, ill assume you havent. Theres this thing branch called systems theory, which basically tries to elucidate how human beings organise themselves based on the various social systems they create, now Google is one the main reasons why there is any dissemnt in your country at all, and i can tell you there are many college students in a particular who are waking up to the reality of your government.Incidently, this is the main reason why NC has so much sway and is so revered by many students. Now the system your government has created, particularly the media (and the nationalism being drummed up in your country) is the primary reason that thr truth isnt getting through, you should be smart enough to know that these systems that are basically controlled by the governmenr and they reflect there agenda in one way or another, now i will admit if i were debating a philosopher on this he would most likely say that human behaviour and creativity would overide the government but the reason this isnt the case is becasue the culture thas essentially been modeled to drum out the level of free thinking required among people to lead to a real awakening.You see it all comes down to exposure, how many people look up the facts on google compared to how many people come home and listen to Bill O Reilly, think about it. Most people like the garbage their exposed to, they consume their cultural garbage rather than trying to live a wholey individual life. Then if you try to tell any of them that Bill O reill may be trying to pull the wool over their eyes, they dont want to hear it. Look i honestly beleive it will take a massive recession in your country before the majority will wake up to the reality of your elite corporate controlled government. Theres nothing like a bit of pain (you like the kind your government inflicts on other peoples) to wake peoepl up.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

there are many college students in a particular who are waking up to the reality of your government.Incidently, this is the main reason why NC has so much sway and is so revered by many students.Oh please! College students are liberal all the way to the point where they enter the work force and get their first pay check. Then they look at it and say, "What the hell? Who's FICA? And why are they getting so much of my money?" ;)Let me put it to you this way, when you put your ass through college, you know what you're capable of doing. You know that you are capable of taking care of yourself without mommy and daddy and the government. Liberal Europeans wouldn't know what to do if it wasn't for the government taking care of them. Stop suckling at the government tit. Be a man. Take care of yourself ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

you should be smart enough to know that these systems that are basically controlled by the governmenr and they reflect there agenda in one way or anotherRight. So you're stupid enough to listen to the systems that are basically controlled by some other government of your choosing. A system that reflects their agenda in one way or another ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

You see it all comes down to exposure, how many people look up the facts on google compared to how many people come home and read Noam Chomsky, think about it. Most people like the garbage their exposed to, they consume their cultural garbage rather than trying to live a wholey individual life. Then if you try to tell any of them that Noam Chomsky may be trying to pull the wool over their eyes, they don't want to hear it. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

its a ountry founded on ideals which its never managed to live up to. Name one country that helps rebuild its enemies' countries after a war.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

That wasnt my piont, my piont is that your enitre system fails to live up to the ideals it so cherishes.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Our system is what has allowed us to achieve our ideals better than any other system. Name any other system that has come closer than us.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

If you cant see the flaws in your own system then why should i continue to piont them out for you. I mean your just gona call me a fanatic again. Look your country is the rishest in the world, there is more wealth in your country than any where else on the planet, agreed. Now theres alos as much if not more inequality, homeless people, peopel living on the poverty line than anyother developed country, you cant compare to countries that are no where near as rich as you. Your country is ran by corporations who couldnt give a fuck about the well being of the people. Was that fanatical enough for ya.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Oh, I see the flaws. I just don't care. I don't live their lives. When America prospers, I prosper. Does that mean I don't give a shit about them? No. I do care. But the problem is that my solution to their problem is not their solution.Let me go off on a tangent here. I am not gay. I have nothing against gay people. In fact, I wish they can get the same benefits as heterosexual married couples. However, their approach to the problem is different than mine. They want to change the meaning of the word marriage. They want to force heterosexual bigots to accept them. They think that they will be considered "normal" if they can force the government to accept their unions as a marriage.My approach? Forget about the heterosexual bigots. You will NEVER change their mind. There will always be a segment of the population that will NEVER consider them :normal." The word "marriage" is just a word. Married benefits is a very tangible thing. So, focus on what is tangible. Go for the benefits. It doesn't matter what the government or the rest of the population calls it. If they call it a "civil union" great. So long as they get their benefits. If my approach is NOT acceptable to gays, fine. Then force the government to stop using the word "marriage" and replace that word with the words "civil union" for EVERYONE. But no one wants this approach. So I don't care about either side. They get what they deserve. Whatever happens.Similarly, as long as there are fanatics against America, there will be American fanatics against their group. Whatever their group is. And I don't give a fuck about either side. They get what they deserve.The difference between you and me is that you have chosen a side ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

You have chosen a side as well Joe whether you realise it or not, you are basically too self interested to acknowledge what is really going on. I dont blame you for this, in fact your no different than most. Its much easier to beleive in a lie when that lie is gnerally accepted by most of the peopel around you, then once the truth is denied to you, you can get comfortable, its just when someone shows you, thats the problem.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

What? I have taken the position I have taken because it's more fun to mess with you ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Well i dont beleive entirely beleive you given that ive been lookin at your arguments since long before i joined this site andn its quite apparent to me that you always take the nationalitic side, you always stand up for Americas actions, thats why i consider you a fanatic. Ive read alot of your arguments Joe you took a side a long time ago i imagine, maybe you just didnt realise it.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Yes, I did take a side. I decided that it's a lot easier to piss off a liberal than to piss off a conservative. A conservative will just think you're nuts and never respond. A liberal keeps on coming back for more ;)Even after I flat out tell you that my intended goal is to get your goat, you don't let me down. One time you got so mad you called me an "idot" ;)My friends and I laughed at that one for a couple of days. What kind of an "idot" calls a person an "idot." ;)One would think that a scientist would at least know how to use spell check. But your grammar and rantings show that you can't be a very good one any way. Don't believe me? See how far you can advance in your career by having little temper tantrums and calling people "idots." ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Common CB, you really think that America is out to get the world. Obama is probably the anti-Christ. The corporations are out to kill. You thrive on wild ass conspiracy theories. You're a fanatic. ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

No, of course not. thats just how you've chosen to view my opnions. America is no more evil than any other country in the world and when your empire falls someone else will tyake your place e.g. China. And they may very well be alot worse than you eveer were. You see my piont that you've missed from the beginning due to your small mindedness is that America is the greatest terrorist nation on the planet, not because they are more evil than anyone else but becasue they are more powerful than anyone else. You may think my views are extreme but i can tell you that outside your little tiny suburban upper middle class world these views are far from radical. Once you get out of your country anti-american sentiment is not uncommon, it also isnt derived from fanaticism, unfair bais, hatred of your freedom or anyother bullshit propangda you've been taught to beleive OK. Its derived from the atrocious crimes commited in your name.Also, you think im full of conspiracy theories, this diesnt surpirse in the least. YOu been completely unwilling to check the veracity of any of the claims ive made, but dont you think its a little bit ignorant to label someone without even checking whther anythin he is saying is true. I suppose you probably just turned on fox news and went "ahhhhhhhhhhhhh, of course hes wrong. What a fanatic, this is the real truth. Thats it BIll tell us all how wwe should deal with the terrorists".I challenge you to find anything that i claimed to be true that is a conspiracy theory. Go on. back your claim up for change Joe. I know probably not used to it.Oh and by the way you can tell your rich Iraqis friends that they should be ashamed of themselves for welcoming America into their country when they know full well that the majority of their people are sufering greatly becasue of it. I have no respect for them.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

Have you even traveled outside of your country? I have. I take my little tiny suburban upper middle class savings and travel the world.That's how I know that your rantings are shit. Your world view is obtained from reading the books of a deranged man, N.C. ;)BTW, what crimes were committed in the name of Joe_Cavalry? I didn't know I was that popular ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

Yes ive told you before i have trvelled to Ecuado, Peru,Bolivia, Venezuela, Cuba, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia,Hong Kong, and Iran. Ive also been to Britain, France and New York but i normally dont inculde those in that list.You think my entire world view has been obtained from reading N.C., Jesus no. Not that it wouldnt be enough, i mean the mans works are just so comprehensive. Please give me some credit, these views are the views of anyone whos gone out and tried to find things out for themselves. they have been shaped by a multitude of sources and experiences. I'm not even gona list them, ill just say this, there based as much on pro-american news as anti (if you can call it that). You should look up the American show demcoracy now, its not anti-american its just a news organisation that exists in your country thats actually free.BTW, these crimes are commited in the name of every american citizen, your passivity perpetuates them.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

What do you mean passive? I'm actively defending them from maniacs like you ;)
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

So you admit to actively defending the hanus and horrible crimes of your country.That sounded like admission to me, yep you just admitted everything.
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: What? Are you on drugs?

I defend everyone from fanatics. I prefer moderates. ; )
Debate: Can we use Non-Violence to destroy terrorism?
Side: A resounding YES!

I'm quite moderate actually. I mean how do you define moderate. I define a moderate as someone who doesnt beleive in anything extreme to the extent that he would be willing to participate and support extreme actions. Again, this just my definition. Now lets look at who the real extremist is, ok. You support the Iraq war, dont you. That has killed 1 million people most of them innocent, whether you think so not. Thats a pretty extreme view in my book, and even though it isnt in America, it is everywhere else you can be sure of it. Now i would oppose any pre-emptive military action by any country especially the US, but i get the sense that if your country wanted to go and fuck up Iran or another country you'd fully support them and you'd probably lie to others for them and say were going in there to "help them"You see you have and you would support these extreme actions while i would condemn them with every fibre of my being. So whos the real extremist, huh? Really Joe, get real man. You dont prefer moderates you prefer people with the same basic views you hold, maybe slightly different but essentially the same.