Debate: Is quoting the bible a good argument for Christians?
Side: No

"The fact is scientists have failed to locate a single missing link, NONE, they have not found ONE"You really don't mind plying scientific false hoods if it can even tacitly support your ideology that literally amounts to nothing except blind faithhttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.htmlhttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/ 2006/03/0327_060327_skull.html "…….If what they say is true"Why what do they say?"there should be millions that exist. Where are they?"I don't recall anyone ever claiming there should be millions of missing links all over the place, and if they did im 100% certain they mean it in a way in which those links could not be easily excavated."Evolution a fact?"Yes its a scientific fact that no scientist would disagree with, however a fundamentalist wackjob like you could disagree about the true colour of an orange, thats why nobody pays you any real notice within mainstream discourse, you're a black mark upon the prevaling secular soceity within the US."And why has it always been called a theory?"Gravity is a theory as well but if you doubt whether that is fact try jumping off a tall building, if you have faith im sure your God will save you, and if you ecord the whole thing and he does actually coem to your rescue you'll be able to rpove all of us rational individuals wrong."A set of beliefs concerned with explaining the origins and purposes of the universe"Wow you looked up a definition, good for you, you know beleiving that the entire universe is constructed of burnt almonds also qualifies as a "set of beliefs concerned with explaining the origins and purposes of the universe"Origin: Burnt AlmondsPurpose: Eating when you get hungryThere this has just as much validity as everything you believe, it must pain you to have to realise that ;-)"So based on that, evolution at best is a religion based on faith"A ha ha ha ha ha ha, i am amazed, its as if you think you arrived at that conclusion based on rational thought, and a chain of logical reasoning, what you have really done is weave a web of bullshit, and not a very good one at that, your enitre argument amounts to "im a fundamentalist wackjob so some im going to make a fool of myself by making ridiculous claims"Evolution is based on reproducible test and obsevations, and the collation of huge amounts of data pertaining to a multitude of scientific disciplines e.g. Genetics, Molecular Biology, Anthropology, Cognitive Science, Archaeology, and Paleontology to name but a hadfull) which all piont to exactly the same phenomenon.When a hypothesis becomes a theory in science it is rarely if ever disproven, what happens is that is becoems further and further refined in order to more accurately model reality, and observation."Evolution reveals that those who believe it are truly capable of faith in the invisible"No it reveals that there are sane individuals amoing the human species capable of having confidence in a tried and tested method that ahs given birth to modern times and all accompanying technological advancement."It’s blind faith….. the same as in any other religion"Have some humility for god's sake, you haev no comprhension of anything remotely scientific yet you feel supremely confident in your ability to criticise it, you people never cease to amze me. Your argument amounts to: i don't understand science, and because it comes into comflict with my pre-existing beliefs, i thus fear it, and try to disprove as much as i can but deep down i know im figting against the tide, and people who hold my small minded views are becoming less and less"What do you think?