azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Same with Jewish people, or catholics, yet it's your specific 'god' that must be taught.Jews are a small minority. Catholics are Christians and they worship the same God as any other Christians. Are you claiming that Catholics do not believe in God and the teachings of Jesus Christ? I'd love to see you try to make that argument stick.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Well seeing as you are talking about specific biblical teachings of Jesus I believe they would...Even if they didn't, are you really saying because christian's are the majority it should be taught in schools? You are disillusioned and you should be careful playing like this it might be you some day in the minority about a subject....
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Are you claiming Catholics are Christians or making another claim? If you say they are, your argument just died. If you say they are not, we need to see citations and arguments as to why not.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Another What!?! moment lmao...You're asking me to prove the differences, if there are, in the beliefs of Christians and Catholics relating to Jesus, as if this somehow will probe you're initial point? You've just gone cray bro
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

It was you that differentiated between Catholicism and Christianity, not me. So did you have a point, or are you dropping the concept from this debate completely? You, not me... you, said would I want Catholicism or Judaism taught in schools? And then I pointed out your fatal flaw. Catholics are Christians, so why would I care?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Well you seem to think you are a know it all, what if a catholic or fellow christian differs from your beliefs in jesus's teachings? Well then you're just a bunch of muppets arguing over fairy tales...Oh no, I can feel another religious war coming on lol!
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Not to mention these books were written by the men at the time, they are mostly irrelevant and out dated and shouldn't be used for a guide in the 21st century.Do not steal. Do not kill. Do not commit adultery. Do not covet your neighbor's goods. What are you even talking about?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

It's really cute when people are able to pick out the 'good' parts of the bible while disregarding the rest...Let's think....Slavery?...Maybe for one?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Just look at the 10 commandments, have you read them?Yep. Are you saying we SHOULD KILL, SHOULD STEAL, SHOULD COVET OUR NEIGHBOR'S GOODS, SHOULD COMMIT ADULTERY?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

No and I didn't say that either, are you saying we should kill our neighbour if he works on a Sunday? lol nice morals...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

That's not in the New Testament or in the teachings of Jesus Christ. The Jewish Torah is meaningless to a Christian concerning rules, ethics or morality. So what moral code are Atheists bound to again? Oh yeah... none. Ask Mao.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

So you don't follow the 10 commandments? You just pick and choose what you like about jesus? lol what got you? the water into wine?lol
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Jesus didn't teach the 10 Commandments. That would be Moses... in the Jewish Torah...So... you believe in regeneration by worms, in abiogenesis, and that something manifested from nothing... but what you cannot believe is that a programmer from beyond this matrix can cause water to be reprogrammed into wine? Hmmmm... your mind seems to be contradicting itself... Are you sure that debate is for you? I don't want to traumatize you into doubting your atheistic worldview if you are going to just go off and off yourself like many atheists do. Are you going to off yourself if I continue?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

I haven't even told you what I believe, but I certainly don't believe the teachings of some archaic riddle book that science has proven to be factually incorrect again and again lmfao...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Such as?.... Making blind assertions is white noise. Which "scientific claim" do you want to debate from the Bible? It'd better be good Jackson. I've been doing this since the Internet was a "thing". What do you have?http://www.debate.org/brontoraptor/debates/
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

lol Well to be honest most of it is bullshit I wouldn't know where to start, noah's arch, parting the red sea, the worlds 6k old is just to easy I can go on and on and on and on...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Noah's ark is an allegory for the end of the world and is referenced by Jesus as such, seas part all the time, but it doesn't matter because Christians aren't Jews, and nobody is claiming the world is 6,000 years old, nor does the Bible. You are welcome to cite where it says it, but it doesn't, and go ahead... go on and on. Guess what my talent is...http://biblehub.com/luke/17-26.htmhttp://swapmeetdave.com/Bible/Parables/
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Noah's ark is one of many unsubstantiated claims made in the bible.Sea's parting by a natural occurrence, is completely different to claiming a single man's ability to part the red sea on command. "but it doesn't matter because Christians aren't Jews" What does that even mean? lolThere are many references to the age of the world in the bible, again if you are ignorant I will suggest you enlighten yourself.Your talent seems to be losing debates, something that you clearly put way to much time in to...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Then do you really need to be told not to murder and steal?This is a semantical and abstract argument you are making. Nevertheless, I'm game. Did Mao and Stalin need to be told not to murder? Looks like it might have saved 60-100 million lives. If you could convey to an animal to not steal or kill, would that help? Perhaps. Maybe the cat wouldn't have eaten the parakeet. If you had no education and had been raised by wolves, would you even understand what "do not kill" and "do not steal" even means? Probably not. You'd simply think they were survival skills.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

I'm sure they knew that murder was a fundamental flaw in a society considering they were world leaders, but they obviously justified their own actions in other way's, or maybe not, but who care's it's irrelevant anyway, they were both familiar with christianity and other religions but it did absolutely zero to sway their moral compass, so your argument is a pointless false equivalency...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Who says they knew the tenants of Christianity? I've seen you be ignorant on Christian doctrine and basic facts of Christianity here on this very site, and you have the internet. They did not.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Yet I am still able to form a moral compass, astonishing!!
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

1)How do I know that you are able to "form a moral compass"?2)In the other reply you said you are not an atheist, so you were lying then or you are lying now.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

As I said moral's are perspective of the individual, I am an individual, am I going slow enough for you?I have never said what I believe in, it is irrelevant.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

This is what our highly evolved brains are meant to be for!So, we are a product of evolution, just like all other biological agents (animals, bugs, etc) on Earth, but we do not need to be taught morality? If you'd been raised in Pakistan, you'd think the moral thing to do to an adulterer is stone them to death. So apparently the version of "morality" that you are talking about must be learned.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

You are correct to an extent, morality is perspective of the individual, just the same as the pakistani's think they're right, so do you... :)
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Yeah, and Mao and Stalin used Atheism to think that THEY were right. Then they murdered a population of peoples that is the equivalent of mass murdering everyone in California, Texas, New York, Ohio, and Florida combined.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

And if you want we can do a full history lesson and talk about the crusades.... :)
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

The Crusades were a thousand years ago and in response to the Muslim conquests. It was also during a time when a monarch was king, and warriors survived per their allegiance to said king. Mao and Stalin lived within modern history. So did the other plethera of Atheist dictators that have oppressed their people. Would you like a link?https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/9d/cb/2c/9dcb2c8a25c0b500ddf4b42e6b1e11c5.jpg
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

I suppose you're not mentioning Hitler considering he was baptised a catholic lmfao
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Aaah... you tossed me a slow ball. Nice. I'll take it."You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?[4]I can imagine people being enthusiastic about the paradise of Mohammed, but as for the insipid paradise of the Christians! In your lifetime, you used to hear the music of Richard Wagner. After your death, it will be nothing but hallelujahs, the waving of palms, children of an age for the feeding bottle, and hoary old men. The man of the isles pays homage to the forces of nature. But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A n* with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in transubstantiation.[5]Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism [Islam], that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.[6]The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science... The instructions of a hygienic nature that most religions gave, contributed to the foundation of organized communities. The precepts ordering people to wash, to avoid certain drinks, to fast at appointed dates, to take exercise, to rise with the sun, to climb to the top of the minaret — all these were obligations invented by intelligent people. The exhortation to fight courageously is also self-explanatory. Observe, by the way, that, as a corollary, the Moslem was promised a paradise peopled with sensual girls, where wine flowed in streams — a real earthly paradise. The Christians, on the other hand, declare themselves satisfied if after their death they are allowed to sing hallelujahs! ...Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that's why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.![7]https://wikiislam.net/wiki/QuotationsonIslamfromNotableNon-Muslims#AdolfHitlerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWFdYEMHj14 https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pjk34r7OSkM/maxresdefault.jpg http://markhumphrys.com/Images/246.jpghttp://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/recruited.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fo99fIsMOI
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Ok well thanks for spending all that time proving my point, did you even read it or just cut and paste? lmfao!I think it's safe to say now that I have utterly decimated you...It was fun :)
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Not actually. Hitler praised Islam and attacked Christianity. That was your point? Okay. I win then. You're stuck with Atheist mass murders, and I'm not. Apparently you didn't read his quotes that I provided or couldn't comprehend what he was saying. Anything else?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

There have been more wars caused in the name of religion than anything else.Need I say more?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

And besides, Barack Obama was raised in Indonesia and took Islamic Studies in school, according to his own book. Are you admitting or claiming that he is/was a Muslim?https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/09/barack-obama-childhood-indonesia
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

lol And there is currently plenty of whole hearted christians sitting in jail for crimes from child molestation to mass murders, what's your point?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Oh yeah? Show them to us, and prove they are Christians. I'll wait.......... *
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Don't worry, you can go and visit them yourself at the prison chapel lol!!!!
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

So you can't provide yet another source or link, thus you have dropped another point. Evasiveness is just a sign of fear and weakness to me, and you are in retreat.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

If you are not familiar with the large incarcerated population of people that consider themselves christian's, again, you just prove your own ignorance.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Well i don't know how evolved yours is though.....Aaaah... an ad hominem attack to end your diatribe. Nice. You probably would be best served to not question the intelligence of someone dissecting and destroying your points.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

I have gone through all your comments and countered each one, some were basically just gibberish lol I don't know why you couldn't keep it to a simple single comment like normal people do, maybe you were raging to hard...Anyway please have a read, I think we will both agree the only one getting destroyed here is you :)
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

You haven't countered any of my 8 rebuttals above. The points aren't dropped if you do not rebuttal each one.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Anyway please have a read, I think we will both agree the only one getting destroyed here is youNot really. You haven't even built a foundation for any strong point yet. Christianity is the foundation of Western culture. It is not the problem. It was the solution. Islam isn't religion. It is Islam. You haven't countered this argument at all.Atheist leaders have caused more death than all religions combined in the last 100 years. Atheism is not a solution. It is a problem. You haven't countered this argument at all.You have lost this debate, unless you care to continue. Are you declaring defeat?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

'Christianity is the foundation of Western culture. It is not the problem'The Spanish inquisition, the crusades etc. etc. I would consider a problem at best...Atheism and scientific research is what has built solutions to problems like medicines for getting sick, while you are sitting there praying to get better....
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

We have a false eqivalency going on here. 1)You can't name anything modern. I can.2)You have no idea what the exact circumstances were of ancient events.3)Scientific research in the West was going on long before Atheism had any numbers or power.4)I'm not praying to get better. Assumptions and ad hominems are not your friend in debates.5)I assume you are practicing witchcraft or Satanism, seeing so many Atheists do. Can I assume that? You tell me.https://humanisticpaganism.com/2014/05/14/an-atheists-magical-practice-in-detail-by-atheistwitch/ https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0046HANM8/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

1) The fact the pope is condemning a scientifically proven method of contraception for one.2) Neither do you, and here's a tip, science can prove neither does the bible.3) You could consider the 'mentos in a coke' experiment scientific research, that doesn't necessarily make it credible or relevant.4) If you're not praying then what are you doing? Nothing? Or taking the scientifically designed medicine.5) Nah not at all, I just think for myself, use rational methodology to reach conclusions, it's actually easy and you skip right through all the bullshit, you should try it some time!
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

1) The fact the pope is condemning a scientifically proven method of contraception for one.I'm not a Catholic. The Pope is meaningless to me, nor do I care what he says. He should stay in the field of his expertise.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

1)You can't name anything modern. I can.1) The fact the pope is condemning a scientifically proven method of contraception for one.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Don't care about the Pope who is a moron. Anything else?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

2) Neither do you, and here's a tip, science can prove neither does the bible.I have no idea what this even means because it was not written in the English language or has multiple typos.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

2)You have no idea what the exact circumstances were of ancient events.2) Neither do you, and here's a tip, science can prove neither does the bible.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

So that made no sense. What else you got?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

3) You could consider the 'mentos in a coke' experiment scientific research, that doesn't necessarily make it credible or relevant.Couldn't care less. Many vaccinations, the atomic bomb, refrigeration, the air conditioner, the automobile, the airplane, etc were created when the nation was almost completely Christian, over 90%.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

And I can name a handful of inventions not created by christian nations, or better yet you can google them yourself...this is boring...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

So what? I've already killed your point. Your point was Atheism caused science and invention. Guess not.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

I literally never said atheism caused science and invention, you are just getting desperate now...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Then you have no point, and I win another debate. This is like taking candy from a baby. You might want to decide if you are atheist or not before you take on a debate as atheist/no atheist. It's gotten sad. you don't even know where you are at anymore.*
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

My argument is religion is not ideal for society, you then just assume I'm an atheist, what have I told you about assuming? How slow do I need to go for you?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

It doesn't look boring. You keep responding. Do you not have control over your own typing? Are you a brain in a jar or something? (giggle)
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Well then a brain in a jar is absolutely destroying you all over this page, to be honest I'm surprised you don't have more shame...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Nope. You are yet to provide one single link, piece of evidence, or any single source even on request. You didn't only lose. You made a fool of yourself, and I was glad to give you the ass kicking that you deserved. And? You are welcome. Off ya go.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Unlike you I don't need to constantly google and learn what I am talking about, most of this is just common knowledge in the 21st century, It's just sad your still getting your info from some mythical book some guys wrote thousands of years ago....So logical!
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

4) If you're not praying then what are you doing? Nothing? Or taking the scientifically designed medicine.Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's. If I need medicine, I take it. If I need prayer, I pray. If I don't want a swift kick in the nuts, I reject Atheism as a personal belief that offers me nothing. See how that works?
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

If you want to deny yourself the knowledge of your own true existence, instead blindly believe one of the thousand religions, I couldn't care less lol your loss...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

There are a thousand religions? Show me a list. I know of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, (all Abrahamic) Hinduism, and Buddhism (which is nontheistic). The rest have little to no following. So show us the 1,000 religions.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

Don't you see, you're just proving your own ignorance, this is great lol!Google them genius it's not that hard :)
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

Go ahead. It's your claim. You do know how to copy and paste don't you? I'm not going to try and make your argument for you. Go ahead. Scurry off and get us the links to "thousands of religions", so that you don't look like a complete pod.
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Left's perspective

The only 'pod' here is the one completely ignorant to more than a handful of religions, child's play...
Debate: What would be ideal for society?
Side: From the Right's perspective

You can't even name them or provide a single link. This has gotten sad. You may be the worst debater I've ever seen... well behind dermot...