azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Kids DO NOT follow what their teacher is saying by looking at their mouths! They listen to the words! And someone, like I said, with braces is just as difficult to understand as someone with a piece of cloth in front of her mouth!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

If they pulled out a gun CCTV wouldn't be useful.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Yes as well as all other religious symbols.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It's useless part of barbaric religions, it's in most cases involuntary and pointless
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It's a symbol of oppression. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

who said that?? .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Thousands of refugees from Islamic shitholes, Taking it down in public is equal to suicide.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

suicide?! what are u talking about ?!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

In Iran if you take down the cloth from your head in public, in few minutes "Modesty Police" will show up ...and the women will disappear forever.In countries like Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan... they will kill on the spot.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

because they have strong laws! but what about UAE and Saud Arabia? People in these countries have absoluteluy freedom of wearing hidjab BUT all the same women wear it!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Strong laws? You are Fucked Up man. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

u really have no ideas to argue! just fuck off !
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Only in city centers leave it and good bye. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

It is the Muslim Law! Muslims are instructed to wear it, just like Christians are instructed to go to church on Sundays and Hindus are prohibited from eating beef!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

In which "Christian" country are people being publicly executed for not going to church on sunday?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

There is no 'Christian' country. And maybe some governments are not as strict with the laws of religion as others. So what? What do we need next? A world government? Oh, and, of course, one that would originate from America???
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

What about allowing public executions of people who left Islam ...it's part of their religion and culture ...so freedom of religion.... no?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

it's not the true Religion! it's extemly muslim people, who is crazy! i don't say about them! people always confused because of this. this 'Muslims' are wrong! they don't support real Islam roles!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It's about 40% of Muslims who thinks that way. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Not 45%? Can you show me the statistic please ?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Research has been done in the UK. Questioned were University students who claimed that they are Muslim.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html @ between educated Muslim who had no problem to speak in public about this matter... so the real number will be much higher.What about the completely illiterate majority? I'm quite sure that the overall number will be about 70 maybe 80%.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

You don't realize that "sharia Law" isn't neccassirly "death to women without hibjab" ? but is actually more of a family court system then anything.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

where did you get these numbers ????
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Well I can only talk from a UK point of view. There is a freedom of religion and conscience. If those women want to wear the hijab then they should be permitted to. So long as they're not interfering with the rights of others.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

For sure! and they don't! does wearing hidjab infringe on the other people rights???
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

See the other column ;)
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Freedom of religion is something different that freedom to force someone in region... They do not want to wear it. They have to want it otherwise they will be punished.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Freedom of religion is also different then freedom to force someone out of religion, some may very much want to wear it. We already have laws against abuse and so on.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

I would advice you to Google "honor killing int he UK" to have some picture about what happens to girl if she "freely" decides not to wear cloth.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

It is the principal argument of racists that they take a extreme thing from a minority within the community they hate and try and convince people that it is represenative of the whole.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It's not a minority .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

No you haven't understood me. I meant those that do honour killings are in the minority.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

yes, but wast majority does agree with it as the right way how to solve that issues...There is max 200 000 000 of Islamic psychopaths but about billion of people who does silently agree with them and never will stand against them.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

No, because it's people's choice and right! And nobody can ban it
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

If it's people's choice, should the government ban the modesty police? ;)
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

nobody bans to wear your favorite clothers, but why hidjab should be band?! isn't it?)
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

So it's OK for women NOT to wear hidjab? No one is going to hurt them?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Yes, it absolutely okay! Islam suggests women to wear it, but u have choice. Countries like Iran, Iraq, Afhganistan is EXTREAMLY Islamic countries where women absolytelu have no rights and it's WRONG! Religion doesn't say oppress women.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

In most of Islamic countries there is a death sentence for putting the cloth down or refusing to wear it, but yes it's a choice ...to live or die.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

I would argue that has more to do with their anti-west stance then it has to do with their religion. They have found in islam something the imperials didn't take.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Because people are forced to wear it, if they refuse in most of places on whole planet they will be punished...
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It's not a choice, you ave to wear it or they kill you..... technically it's a choice ....but... :D
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Yes, it's can be banned, It has been banned in France and will be in other countries.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

this will be an occasion for mass protests .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Yes and after them there will be society as we know it or a Somalia 2.0
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Yes but as far as I am aware this wasn't anything to do with islamic clothing. It was the fact that they didn't want people being able to cover their face in riots and such. It is illegal to cover your whole face on the streets in France.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

So if someone has a horrible growth on his face that would infect other people, he can't cover it up? Or if someone has the flu and he wears a flu mask, he'll get arrested for trying to ensure other people don't get sick? The hidjab covers just as much of the face as the flu mask!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

For majoriy of women force in i, it's not a choice. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

As far as I know the Hidjab is only a requirement when Women go to Mosque as they must have their heads covered when they go to the Mosque a lot of Muslim Women choose to wear the Hidjab at other times and a lot of them choose not to.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

YES! you are absolutely right! lots of Muslim women wear hidjab or some kind of long dress when they go to Mosque.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

No, she has to wear it pretty much all the time. Death sentence is a common punishment. In less primitive countries it's like 100 lashes... It's nothing voluntary. They usually have to say that it is ...especially in places where someone else could hear them...
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

I cant comment on everywhere because unlike some people I dont pretend to know the laws in every country in the World but from a UK persective banning the Hidjab would infringe on peoples freedom of religion and freedom to dress how they choose banning, it is the thin end of the wedge what would be next freedom of speech?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

of course! it infringes on human rights! most of us live in Democratic countries and it's absolutely not acceptible for that type of government system!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

I'm really curious about exactly what countries you are referring to. It seems as though nations which practice Sharia law, where there is a national law stating that you must wear a hijab, aren't the places where the government would ban it. So if you live in a nation which would possibly ban a hijab then there are no death penalty laws. What does banning a hijab in those nations have to do with nations which practice Sharia law as you describe. Every Muslim that I have known (both those who do and do not wear a hijab) have stated it as a personal choice, not something they are told they must or must not do.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

I dare you to take down hidjab in some small town in Iran :D
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

I said nations that do not use Islamic law, which Iran does. Any nation following Islamic law is not going to be interested in banning hijabs.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Hidjab shouldn't be banned! that's it )
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Yes, Allah said that women HAVE to close their body, and mostly Muslim women support it.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

and i women decide not to do it, she is free do die :D .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

if u don't have any ideas or real arguments don't write rubbish!!!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

It's not a rubbish. This is how it is. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Its not rubbish mate.if you are to be beaten up for not wearing an extra cloth, then theres no freedom at all
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It's not freedom of choice they are being forced in it, allah is not with capital A, it means god not a name of one.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

ask Muslim women and they will answer that it's teir CHOICE! and Allah is capitalized, because it is one of the God's name!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

i agree that muslims have right to wear their muslim clothers, if they support it why not?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

i agree that muslims have right to wear hidjab if it is right for them why not?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

people don't understand such simple things like right of choice...
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

I am a Muslim woman. Ok, girl really. I agree it is my choice if I want to wear the hidjab or not, and I agree that I want to. Real Muslim women do not want men to stare at their faces with lust if they are pretty or with disgust if they are not. We do not want to be noticed by people on the street. That is why we wear the hidjab, so that men would not even glance at us because there is nothing to see. That way, men do not try to ravage us, as they do not find us attractive in any way. The hidjab (the whole attire of a Muslim women, actually) is not a symbol of oppression! It is a protection for Muslim women against the lustful desires of a non-Muslim man!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Wearing a hijab should not be legally prohibited, but nor should it be legally sanctioned nor required. People ought to be free to express themselves as they personally see fit.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

No. Women have the right to cover their head as long as they show their face.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Sadly for most of them it's not really voluntary .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

So true. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Why would you want to see a woman's face? So you can see if she is good-looking enough to marry? If you are a not a Muslim man, she will not want to (will not be allowed to) marry you. If you are a Muslim man, you should respect her modesty, and you should love her, nomatter what she wears!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

It is for security reasons. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

What kind of security involves showing your face? What are thumbprints or eye scans for, then?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

You are full of shit. People often cover their faces for criminal activity. No special treatment for anyone.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

as long as it is not being forced or obliged on people, i do not see any reason for the hijab to be banned. it is a part of personal freedom, it is a part that is favorable in a religion. therefore if those wearing the hijab do not mind it and are not forcing it on other women, then the government has no right to ban it.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

What's a "hidjab"? I'm familiar with hijab, tudong, niqab, and of course burka. But I've never heard of a "hidjab". Anyway, assuming it's still an item of women's clothing then no, it shouldn't be banned. What kind of a misogynist goes around banning women from wearing clothes? Women should have the right wear whatever they want to wear, just like men.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Hidjab is actually the same as Hijab. It is just that these names are all originally written in Arabic, so there are many variations to the romanized version.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

People have their own choice. We can wear what they want. Just some people want to cover their body. Why government should be banned?
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Some people wear half of open clothes. It is worse than hidjab. Why government should not banned? Because it is people's choice. You can wear whatever u want.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

we live in a secular state...everyone has his/her rights...but I do not understand why should we cover our body if we are young and beautiful??? Girls who wears hi jab, why are you doing this? there is no proof that God DOES exist!!!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Why should we cover our body if we are young and beautiful?We should find it EVEN MORE important to cover our body if we are young and beautiful. This is so that men do not see us, ogle at our bodies and feel inclined to ravage us (rape, molestation, etc.). How often do you hear of a Muslim woman who has covered up her body being raped or molested.There is no proof that god exists?There is proof everywhere. You just have to be bright enough to see it.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

There is no proof for gods ..that's simply fact. Islam is aggressive and violent religion. It's like a plague, it destroys whole countries.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

What about America, which dropped the atomic bombs on completely innocent people in Japan? Islam promotes peace, not violence. What country has been destroyed by Islam??? The whole world was made for one man, and one man alone, and he was the Last Prophet of Islam, Nabi Muhammad s.a.w. If you say that whole countries were destroyed by Islam, I can say that, if it hadn't been for the one man who was a Muslim, the whole universe would not have been created!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Dear idiot, try to separate your childish fallacies from the real world. Somalia for example...Mohamed was a mass murder and pedophile who claimed that he knows someone who can do magic.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

I am not talking about some imagined antagonist called 'Mohamed'. I am talking about The Prophet Muhammad who freed slaves, brought about peace in almost half the world and yet was merciful enough to allow the Christians to worship freely...
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

so called "prophet" Mohamed was psychopathic mass murder who has started 24 wars, personally, publicly beheaded prisoners and a proud child molester. He was pretty much a bronze age version of Adolf Hitler.
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Islam promotes violence against non Muslims. .
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Correction. Islam promotes and even encourages violence against non-Muslims WHO ARE VIOLENT TOWARDS MUSLIMS!
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: No

Violence to everyone who is not Muslim and is not retarded enough to convert. It's strictly against human rights, no music, no clubbing, you are ordered how to live your life or you will be killed. If you decide to leave that insanity you will be killed. If they find out that you are gay you will be killed... and many many more happy islamic things...
Debate: Should hidjab be banned by Government?
Side: Yes

Often it's not voluntary .
Debate: Should High IQ Individuals Run the Nation?
Side: Yes, they should.

I think it is logic to have intelligent leaders, so overall, I guess I'm on this side of the argument. However, I'm a little hesitant for a couple reasons:a) IQ is not a completely reliable measurement of intellect and more importantly, leadership abilities. I am fairly certain a person with a low IQ may still have excellent leadership skills. I am uncertain how much a low IQ would influence once ability to run a government/nation.b) Ideally, a government should be able to get input from the majority of it's people. Since 'high' IQ implies that it is a greater IQ than the majority, that means that no members of the majority will be running the nation.So while it makes sense to me to have those of high intellect in charge, I wouldn't call it an absolute.
Debate: Should High IQ Individuals Run the Nation?
Side: Yes, they should.

Right, dumber people will make dumber decisions, and that obviously will apply to who can run the nation better. Case closed. If anything, we should never have segregated based on race. We should have segregated based on IQ but we didn't. That would have been a much better case than race or gender. I'm not saying we should because segregation is evil, however it would make a lot more sense. It also would be more individualized to say that someone who has an IQ lower than 85 counts for three fifths of a vote. Its not a completely morally correct law but I could see the case for that as an argument.
Debate: Should High IQ Individuals Run the Nation?
Side: No, they should not.

While I get the basis of your premise, I think you ignored my point "a" in my original post. Who decides what goes on the IQ test? Who decides what merits an 'intelligent voter.' Who decides what makes a person a 'dumber person,' especially when you are judging their intellect on their decision making?
Debate: Should High IQ Individuals Run the Nation?
Side: Yes, they should.

It depends on the type of intelligence. One probably has to define intelligence as something. What I mean by that is lets say you define it academically. This can include math, computers, US and World History, even art history. But that's different from being an intelligent artist because an intelligent artist would have creative intelligence.So, an intelligent voter to me is intelligent in terms of knowledge, insight, argument, etc. in politics and political and overall US History, and also world history. They understand our government and our economy right? Now someone doesn't have to be a super expert on just that subject, but see how once we defined intelligence to fit the premise of voting, we got a lot closer to having a definitive definition and even listed a realistic number of subjects. IMO, that works a lot better than just saying "general intelligence."I also think if one did an experiment, there probably is an overall correlation of average intelligence, but one simply cannot know everything. Also, someone who is intelligence in a well-rounded manner may know less in some places than others. Person A may be highly intelligent at math, but not at being shrewd and street smart.But someone who is intelligent in one or two major areas, my guess, does not have to be a complete savant. The average person with a high IQ in one area, I think has a high probability of still being a little bit intelligent in other areas. So I think there may be a correlation of overall average intelligence.But in the case of voting, I think that's about understanding modern day issues.Any form of intelligence probably has some way it can be used to take advantage of people though, even artistic intelligence. I think even if someone is given a savant skill, then society should treat someone who is gifted in one area, so long as they have developed practical skill in the area to apply the intelligence, as more credible to make decisions for society in that area.I think that goes too far in terms of answering your question, but I think that to decide if someone is an "intelligent voter" that one would need to be educated on modern day issues, history, etc, as mentioned above. They also need to have proven themselves by doing something great to define the standard. After that, the people who pass tests written by those people can then be defined as "intelligent voters."Insight and argument probably needs to be included in these tests. Does someone just remember the material or are they able to provide a practical argument in the area. That's hard to measure but its a lot easier to define, and therefore practically measure, compared to just the word "intelligent" because that means very little until a circumstantial definition is given.
Debate: Should High IQ Individuals Run the Nation?
Side: Yes, they should.

I think the people are too ignorant to do what's good for themselves(the idiot majority). I think we should make slaves out of the dumbest 20%. I've even contemplated killing the stupid - we could use population reduction.>> brain flash- maybe voting is ok, but exclude the bottom IQ. Have an IQ qualification to vote😉👍
Debate: Should High IQ Individuals Run the Nation?
Side: No, they should not.

You know, there's this thing called reading. You should try it sometime.