Debate: Would Mitt Romney be a better president than Barrack Obama.
Side: No

The problem with Obama and his ideology which is based more on socialism we can't affor.Do you have proof of this? He did not run on, does not support, and has done nothing to lead a semi-conscious person to believe he is in any way a socialist. Sounds like you're a victim of the corporate owned right wing smear machine to me.All of these things cost money and go against the grain on free market the rest of the world is going to eat us up if we go this route we are going that Obama wants.All of what things? Reagan was the first to triple the national debt. Bush lead us to the greates recession since the Great Depression. Since Obama took office our GDP has increased, the rate of job loss has slowed, and you haven't paid one red cent more in taxes. I have the feeling that you actually have no idea what you are talking about.Do you have any sources? Have you done any research? Or are you just a right wing cheerleader rooting for your team no matter what they do?The rest of the world didn't hate Bush as much as you thinkAgain, proof.you should be more concerned about what we think here. How about Congress 22% approval rating right the lowest in history that concerns me more right now.Um, my comment about Bush's popularity was in light of world opinion - that low world opinion makes it easier for terrorists to recruit and harder for us to get help with necessary wars and whatnot specifically - therefore, it would not have made any sense at all for me to have "worried" about purposefully misleading stat you spewed for no apparent reason.The reason Congress has a low approval has just as much (and I would even say more) to do with Congress not passing Obama's Healthcare yet.I mean, since Obama is so much more popular than any Congressman right or left, it makes sense doing more of what Obama wanted would increase that approval huh?I know, logic is really annoying to Right Wingers.Here are some facts for fake fiscals like yourself.Bush and the Bush run congress passed Medicare Part D for a cost of 389 Billion without even blinking and with no plan to pay for it.They also passed a 1.2 Trillion dollar tax cut with absolutely no plan to pay for it, again without even blinking.I'm not even talking about the Iraq war which Bush and his Congress didn't bother figuring out how to pay for.The Healthcare Bill has an estimated cost of 138 BillionLet me repeat that 138 BillionOn top of that, it is going to lower our national debt!This fiscal argument against Healthcare reform is literally retarded (look up retarded it really is)Now, now all the sudden Conservatives are "fiscal" out of nowhere. Conservatives have never balanced a single budget. Nixon didn't, Reagan didn't, Neither Bush balanced the budget.Clinton is the only president in recent history to have balanced the budget. He is the only President to leave the country with more money than he found it.And Clinton is a left wing liberal in case you didn't notice. I'll bet by the end of Obama's 8 years, he'll have a balanced budget. Then right wingers will need to fall back on ethics or something like they had to with Clinton.The fact is, you have no idea what you are talking about. You base your opinions on lies and pre-determined notions with absolutely nothing to back it up.Historically, and currently, Liberals are far, far more fiscally sound than conservatives.