azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

So explain the difference:Both sites have bias.Both sites are full of incorrect information.Both sites show what the majority enters.My point is not regarding their accuracy.. only that both sites are full of faults and you can't (especially YOU) judge which is more accurate. That's where your hypocracy lies. You're wrong either way until you can prove to me what the term nice guy means. You've avoided that throughout all your posts.I have got nothing more to say. If you continue it's probably only for the sake of argument or through stubborness than the lack of reasoning on my side.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"Both sites are full of incorrect information."- the difference is that some people try to use wikipedia as a source, when, in fact, it is the same as this site."Both sites show what the majority enters."- what? An entire Wikipedia article can change from one person. There is no kind of majority going on there. You may argue that more people biased to one side would more often change the information, but then that is not the same thing as on this site. The important fact on this site is that the readers can see both sides of the argument and later choose who they support. On wikipedia there is only one side to see."My point is not regarding their accuracy.. only that both sites are full of faults and you can't (especially YOU) judge which is more accurate."- your point is not regarding their accuracy only that people can judge their accuracy? What the hell? lol you are so fucking stupid."You're wrong either way until you can prove to me what the term nice guy means."- first of all what does that have to do with anything we are talking about? You are obviously trying to get off topic. Second, i have answered this question a long time ago and im not going to waste my time finding it because we have already been through that debate and you lost."I have got nothing more to say."- thank GOD.I think you are starting to refrain from using those children names. Have you found that they make you look like idiots?
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

I guess everyone's an idiot except you, huh Sirius? How does is feel to be the smartest person on Earth?
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Not everyone. Just you and Kinda.Im not the smartest person on the earth, im just smarter than you two.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Alright, unless we've all taken IQ tests, there's no way to measure that. It only shows that you're meaner, definitely not smarter. It seems that your technique is to call people idiots just to make them step off and move on to another debate... but it's not proving that you're smarter. At ALL, actually. You seem arrogant enough to claim that you're the smartest person on earth... but I guess you'll argue that, too. Because since I'm OBVIOUSLY of lower IQ level, I'm PROBABLY wrong, so what do I know? You're right again, mister! Ah, just amazing how that always comes out the same, isn't it? Sweet Bejesus, you're smart, dude! Congrats, and give yourself a pat on the back. And while I have no way of knowing, by levels of debating technique, it seems to me that Kinda and I are both smarter than you. And nicer, but we'll never win this debate, because of that! Golly willikers, it sucks to be nice.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"Alright, unless we've all taken IQ tests, there's no way to measure that. "- you wouldn't understand, you're not smart enough."It only shows that you're meaner, definitely not smarter."- dont worry, i am smarter than you."It seems that your technique is to call people idiots just to make them step off and move on to another debate... but it's not proving that you're smarter. At ALL, actually."- thats not my technique at all and you just proved again that you are an idiot for saying something like that."You're right again, mister!"- just for saying that, i think that you are more intelligent than i thought."Congrats, and give yourself a pat on the back."- dont need to."it seems to me that Kinda and I are both smarter than you"- it seems to you that way because you are dumb. I am smarter than you both combined."Golly willikers"- havent heard that one before, im not being sarcastic.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Haha. You're certainly modest! Anyways, I don't care what you say. I'm here to DEBATE. Not argue, and get insultingly personal with people.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"'m here to DEBATE. Not argue"- im not sure what the difference is. Isn't a debate a kind of argument?
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Yeah, but I'm not here to argue about who's smarter or worthless shit like that, I'm here to argue about whether nice guys ever win, etc.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"I'm here to argue about whether nice guys ever win, etc."- not really since you are continuing to argue about this.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

So if false is the winning side of the argument... then the mean guys are winning... so the nice guys aren't!
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"then the mean guys are winning... so the nice guys aren't!"- im actually being nice to you.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Since when does "being nice" involve insisting to someone you've never met that you're smarter and that they're a 'fucking idiot'?? Never.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"Since when does "being nice" involve insisting to someone you've never met that you're smarter and that they're a 'fucking idiot'??"- oh trust me, thats exactly what it involves.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Ummm, no??? Why would I trust you, in any way? That makes absolutely no sense, and I'm thinking that I'm pretty much done talking with you now...
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"Why would I trust you, in any way?"- because im smarter than you and can make better decisions."I'm thinking that I'm pretty much done talking with you now..."- good, finally.......
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

I'm not being irrational. I'll be honest and say that I've been trying to be nice to you, but you're a complete jerk. And one who is worthless to argue with, because you're not even attempting to see things the way I'm trying to tell you. Along with that, your calling me an idiot is pretty ironic, because my arguments are as clear as day and you're not getting it. Goodbye. Good luck with life.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"you're a complete jerk"- uh oh, im a jerk."you're not even attempting to see things the way I'm trying to tell you"- maybe if there was some kind of rational argument that you were putting forth, you would be able persuade me to see it from your side."my arguments are as clear as day and you're not getting it."- they clearly aren't
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

You're clearly an idiot, otherwise you'd understand. The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

You're an idiot for calling me an idiot. I can't understand the stuff that an idiot types.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Alright, you win! Oh hey... what's the name of the argument... hmm.....WHO'S THE IDIOT NOW, SIRIUS? I was right. =]
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"I was right."- no, you were wrong because i am a nice guy.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

lol at cheating part.You could say connections is a form of cheating but it is actually a form of competition. To make the connection and to be able to use it requires certain skills i.e. to be able to make that connection like you - to give you a favour.Except for those rich cunts with rich parents who don't have to lift a finger in their life - only study - and they've got their life set for them. I don't actually mind them until they become snobs. Then they deserve to die and I wouldn't mind kiling them.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

You know what I just realized? I might get killed for saying this, but maybe the winning argument is 'false' because the majority of the people aren't nice... or just haven't had the pleasure of being back-stabbed and stepped on by "friends" along the way. :)
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Nobody is nice all the time cause if they are others just take advantage of them. The truth is nice guys get walked all over, you can't be nice all the time, if you were you'd be a door mat. Therefore, the answer has to be nice guys dont ever win. Bad dangerous boys are viewed as being more attractive (by in large ) by the opposite sex, competitive people who are willing to walk over their own grandmother invariably make it to the top, bad guys win because we live in a bad world where the demons are allowed to run a muck. the entire system is founded on enhancing human greed by seeing how much wealth one can accumulate. Everything comes back to this, we live in a society where accumulating more wealth and status are the top priority for most people, this is because seocity is structured to encourage this. Human innovation and creativity are both subject to this e.g. effective corporate control of scientific research.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Lol nice guys. If you'd rank them by trophies.. they'd get the 'being a good sport' trophy.What's funny is that women SAY they want a nice guy.. but they all know deep down in their hearts they like a real man.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Completely true, man. Join the facebook group, "The Nice Guys." Or something like that. It's all about what you just argued. You are hands-down correct. Very nice.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

I guess nice guys aren't "real men"? That was a stupid thing to say.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

really?? explain..........
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Define what a "real man" is, and then you explain it to me.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Definately not you.It's a loooong ass process but one thing is not to be a pussy.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"Definately not you"- you don't even know me. This just shows that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

That's not complaining.To counter argue that read the rest of your point... LOL... and if THAT's not complainig... read your other posts...When did you ever ask me to define it?really??explain.........."not calling anybody names?"- when someone starts to call somebody else names, it shows two things. They are frustrated and they have nothing more sophisticated to say to the other person. You resorted to name-calling, which shows how your statements have little importance to the debate.No, it just means I'm calling you names. Why? Because it's fun. Watching you complain is also kinda funny. Watching you complaing about name calling is funnier. Watching you complain about how you don't complain makes most of this worthwhile. *BTW the word complain can also be replaces whinge, whine, moan etc."A - Nice guys aren't pussies"- the nicest man in the world couldn't be the strongest and bravest person on the planet? It is extremely ignorant to act as though any person who is nice, is also a pussy.That is what a 'nice guy' is. Unless you've got a different definition. Doesn't just mean a guy who is nice but also other things. Nice guys are complete pussied up little mummy boy pansies. Like you. It also means they COULD be strong (not brave, cause that's NOT being a pum) but they're NOT.So... a hit and a miss pansyboy.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

"To counter argue that read the rest of your point... LOL... and if THAT's not complainig... read your other posts..."- how does that prove that I was complaining or not? That entire line doesn't mean anything. That's like telling someone that their food tastes bad and when they ask you how, you say taste it again and repeat that it tastes bad. You gain no headway, fail to prove your point, and waste time all in the same instance. Unless you can explain to me how I was complaining, instead of just repeating that I was complaining, there is no reason for you to say anything."When did you ever ask me to define it?"- how could i explain this? Do you even think before you type?"No, it just means I'm calling you names. Why? Because it's fun."- do you know those who think its fun to call people names? Children. They cannot find anything else to say, so they just make up a name and say it to people. You obviously haven't become sophisticated enough to learn that.What you need to understand is that there is a difference between the words complain and argue. I haven't been complaining about your inability to prove an ignorant point. I have been arguing, though, against what doesn't make sense. I have to argue with you over what you say because most of it is completely irrational and unreasonable. I argue to try to get you to understand that you are not making any sense when you say that real men cannot be nice."That is what a 'nice guy' is."- you don't understand that a person doesn't necessarily have to be either a "real man" or a nice guy. A "real man" could be a nice guy. It seems as though you have made up your own definition of what a nice guy could be. Basically, a nice guy is a guy who is nice. There is nothing that you could add to that. How could you call a man that is nice a pussy, "mummy boy", or pansy? It wouldn't make sense because you have no information other than the fact that they are nice."So... a hit and a miss pansyboy."- im guessing that people would probably take you more seriously if you didn't call them names. Hopefully im the only one that you do it to.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Bill Gates seems like a nice guy, if you're talking about finances he wins.Barrack Obama is a nice guy, if you're talking about power, he wins.Michael Phelps seems like a nice guy, athletically he probably wins.Who are these mean people winning stuff?
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

They're not nice guys. Well actually Bill Gates might be....
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

It takes a long time, but they eventually get thrown a bone. :)
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Teenage girls go for asses, we grow out of it! Nice guys FTW!
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

i agree with you that most grow out of the ahol phase but at times with the nice guys it leaves a bitter taste in their mouths so to speak because their more or less told they have to wait till the girl/woman discovers herself before the nice guys is found. the nice guy already knew what most girls/women need or needed and in some ways provided that while being the platonic friend but at that time just was never seen as boyfriend material. the good thing as mentioned is they do grow out of it most of the time. the nice guys out there may never fully understand it but are glad thatr eventually they can get the girl. the nice guys in general just wish that it would be earlier than so much latter in their lives. in my case it wasn't until i was 25 when i met my gal who had several jerka*'s before me she's 2 years younger than me. we've been together now for 40 years
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Every now and then a nice guy manages to come out. Bill Gates probably falls in the nice guy category, he seems to be doing alright. Even-though this is the exception to the rule. Because of this one example one cannot say nice guys never win. One can say that most of the time nice guys never win.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Everybody wins the same amount. It has nothing to do with being a "good" person or a "bad" person. Who decides what's good or bad anyway? Things just happen, fate doesn't decide on what happens if your good or bad...
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Nice guys dont finish last... depends on the girl though if the girls just looking for a little play toy with more biceps then brains sure nice guys wont win, but if the girl is looking for an actual guy to be with nice guys kick ass
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Maybe in high school and some college. At those times, sure, girls go for bad-asses. But eventually, she should become mature and realize that a nice guy would be better to raise children with.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

Why are you just talking about girls, Iced? The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Because the debate is about an old adage. Guy likes girl, girl goes for bad-ass, "nice guys never win."Besides, I don't know enough about gays to say "nice gays never win" or not.....
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

NEWSFLASH: Ladies have other aspirations than making babies.Isn't enough to go for guys that respect us (as equals and not baby-makers, mind), without plans for children, marriage, or even long-term relationships? Some girls do go for asshole, just like some guys go for unavailable/manipulative/whatever girls- but it's a minority. Most people like nice people.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

I never said women want to settle down while men don't. After we go through our youthful ages, a lot of us, both men and women, want to settle down. And a lot of these people who settle down have babies. Not a big deal.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

im a nice guy and a lot of people like me for it the reason not girl wants me is my manners I am also very shy and have a hard time socializing I have had a lot if females say how sweet I am
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

I like guys that are tough and hard on the outside. But they have to be a teddy bear on the inside
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: True

tell us whens the last time you run across one of those animals. there are very few guys out there that are what one might call the middle of the road (combination nice guy /bad boy ) these types are a minority in numbers . yes they do exist. however its either or in most girls minds nice guy / or bad boy-jerks as deffinitions. guys fall into one or the other of these last two options
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

When was the last time I ran across one of those animals?-Well he's not an animal. i am currently with him. He doesn't cry in front of anyone except for me, and he stays strong for me during rough times. He doesn't let anyone get to him, if he does, I never seen it. So I guess I have a piece of that minority.
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

Nice guys win, but it just takes longer. Or at least it seems to!
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: False

I disagree. They USUALLY don't win. .
Debate: NICE GUYS NEVER WIN?
Side: FALSE

It only seems that nice guys never win but they do. Nice guys do get rewarded.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Have floods ever occurred? Are some men named Noah? Is it possible that a man named Noah sailed a boat during a flood? What is so unreasonable that it couldn't have happened?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

10 000 000 animals on his boat... ?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Ironically LittleMisfit and I are debating this now. It is impossible for the global flood to occur, but the local flood could have happened.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

It's not the flood that makes it unbelievable... It's the animals.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

You don't believe in animals or is it that you don't believe animals can be carried aboard a boat? What if Noah had just gathered up as many animals as he could before the flood waters came and the writers exaggerated the story a tad bit? Say he had a flock of sheep, a dog, some cows, etc. and he took them with him on his ark.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

I don't believe in animals. Never seen one, never will ;)Nah, the size of the ship is listed in Genesis, but the traditional version says that he had two of every kind of animal aboard the ship. If it was local animals, then that makes a little more sense... But if the flood was global, as many claim it was, then he would have had to save more animals than could fit on his boat.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

How big would have been ones' world in the era that the big flood occurred? Wouldn't the flood be of global proportion if all that you knew was destroyed?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

That's the thing, the writers of Genesis could have unknowingly been referring to only a small part of the world, but most modern Christians don't believe that it was just a portion of the world. They think it was the entire thing.If you believe that it was local, then I don't disagree. I disagree with most literal interpretations of the Bible anyways.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

I'd say that most modern Christians are aware that everything in the Bible is not literal. Too bad the same cannot be said for traditional Christians.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Traditional, modern... I meant the same thing lol. Most Christians think that Satan is a literal being and hell is a literal place.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

I don't know about most Christians, but for me hell is a literal place. The world we live in. I hope it gets better than this.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Wasn't that portion of the Bible a story that God told to the writer? So, the "author" of the story wouldn't be able to call local the whole world because He is God and knows the whole world.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

Why is this even on the "Yes" side of the debate when it is arguing against it?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Have you really not realized yet that a clarification doesn't add any points to the debate?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

No, how would I have known?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

If you've ever made a debate and someone clarifies, you should have noticed that the score doesn't change.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

the local flood could have happened.I disagree :)Here is the debate for anyone who is interested. Warning, huge walls of text but a very interesting debate IMO.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Damn it man, your link takes me to an argument with another link to one of your arguments. I have stepped into argumentception.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

You can ignore the second link. The important parts are recapped anyways.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: No

But the bible doesnt talk about a local flood it says it was a global one. If you wander away from the very clear "word of god" its the equivalent of making shit up.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

That depends on how you interpret the bible. Some scholars understand ancient rhetoric. The world, in the literary context of the bible, is understood to be a localized flooded in some interpretations. Although many still go for the hard diction found in the bible (which is pretty much just reading it as it appears).Edit: Forgive me, I meant to click the "clarify" button. This isn't a dispute to your argument. I only wished to add some clarity since I don't disagree with you.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Yes, I believe it happened.
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

Yes, I believe it happened.I agree.....I will ask you this. Why do you believe it?
Debate: Noahs Ark Did it Happen?
Side: Yes

I believe it because there is there is evidence that the flood happened. For example, archaeologists have dug up fish fossils on mountain tops. Fish normally are in rivers, creeks, lakes, and the ocean.