Debate: Does God exists?
Side: God doesn't exists

You have destroyed any credibility you have by jumping on my keyboard analogy. Because I am a rational person, I can say to myself that it definitely exists, yes. To say "Well, I could be imagining it" is the kind of argument that seems to make you appear to be very deep and intelligent, but in fact it's a rather childish and petty way of scoring points, it is of no real matter.You are claiming infallibility. Are you infallible? How do you know that the very thing that you are seeing is not really there? There are people who see things that aren't real. So I repeat: are you infallible?You seem to love the word "infallible", and let's remind ourselves that who is infallible? The Pope, and not me, to answer your question. The evidence I have to advocate my ability to see things correctly is the conjunction of;You are claiming yourself to be infallible? That is truly arrogant.Hearing what sounds like a keyboard - when -I type on what looks like my keyboard - at the same time as -I physically feel my fingers work that very same keyboard that I can see and hear. If you want to say that this is not enough, then you must assume that no human can know or assume anything whatsoever. It fails me then how you could tolerate the notion of a God, but try and convince me that me keyboard might not be real. That's a new one.No human can know anything with any true certainty. And you apparently have never truly talked to a Christian then. Christians claim that because we are so infallible the only being that can bring forth understanding is God. Do I know that the Bible was written by a man 200 years ago? No. Do I know that the Holocaust actually happened? No. But I go on faith that the Bible was written over successive generations many hundreds and thousands of years ago and that the Holocaust did happen. For one to claim that they know these two events to happen with 100% uncertainty, they are arrogant.Perceptions are what give evidence. If we cannot perceive evidence, how do we know evidence exists?Thats the point; I'm not sure you even understand what you just said. Can I perceive that someone threw a red ball? Yes. Can this perception be incorrect? Yes. To claim that I know it is a red ball is to claim that I am infallible and am incapable of interpreting it incorrectly. Same applies with evidence; for we can all perceive and interpret data differently. So no to the first part but yes to the second.Faith =/= trust. This is quite simply not correct. I trust people on the basis of past experience, I do not have faith wherever I can help it (though sometimes, you have to have faith that McDonald's really served you beef and not something else, etc). The definitions of the two words are absolutely not the same thing, in this point I do implore you to seek a dictionary for clarification.You have faith that the people you are around are not serial killers. Do you not? Do you know where their hearts are at? How do you know that they are not intentionally keeping you close so that they can hurt you? Many people have done that because the world is not a trusting place. You have to find faith in people. Therefore, faith does equal trust.Your style of argument is one I have encountered before. You use absolutes, which forces people to concede, and distracts from the fact that they are not really conceding anything. Telling me that the 99.999% surety with which I state that my keyboard exists; "IS NOT 100% THEREFORE YOU ARE WRONG" is utterly inefficacious in a reasonable debate.I have done no such thing. You on the other hand have done the very same that you are arguing against. You are claiming that you know with 100% certainty that the keyboards are there; that is an absolute. I am saying that we don't know, which is a claim of non absolutism because we do not know.To end, I will concede that it was most infantile to insult you. I apologise, and I sincerely state that nothing typed above in this reply is meant to be insulting, my dear Sir, and I do not lie when saying this. Maybe it'll get your blood boiling, but it is not meant as an insult.I do not get offended easily because I do not know whether or not what they meant was truly what they meant. I cannot judge their heart.