azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Which people other than you insist on my choice of words to begin with?Actually, nobody, including me, insists on your choice of words. Gobsmacked?No. It is your MO. Highly expected by now.Try to understand someone's perspective.I can't possibly understand your perspective because I understand reality.Don't try to dictate to me what I shall say.That was my response to you trying to dictate what I say, you douche.I'm wiling to listen, but I won't tolerate vain low-end arguments.You aren't willing to listen, and along with low-end arguments, you don't tolerate high-end arguments.You have yet to point out a proper contradiction.False.You like to add a false context and pretend that my words contradict based on that context.You provided no context.Try to understand the actual context of my words instead of adding a false context.There is no context that makes all of your statements correct.You assume the context that I had said.You keep asking me to.Whether two statements contradict depends on the context.If in every possible context they contradict, then no it doesn't.On it's own, rarely do two statements ever contradict, you have just got to understand their context.2 things can't be the same and different depending on context.I know what I need to know about.Except what is rude, etc.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Actually, nobody, including me, insists on your choice of words. That's right.And nobody insists upon what the English language means other than you.No. It is your MO. Highly expected by now.You mean the pre-conceived notion that you had created in your head.I can't possibly understand your perspective because I understand reality.Then don't try to communicate with me if that is absolutely the case.That was my response to you trying to dictate what I say, you douche.Don't try turning things round now, it's too late.You aren't willing to listen, and along with low-end arguments, you don't tolerate high-end arguments.You merely try to state the opposite of everything I say without offering proof.False.Yet again, you are stating the opposite of what I say.Stop these statements, no one learns from them.The epitome of being smart is being able to come up with something that stimulates ones thoughts.Everything you have said is obvious and misapplied.Nothing new.You provided no context.The context was provided at the very start, when you began the argument.There is no context that makes all of your statements correct.You severely lack any common reasoning skills.You keep asking me to.No, I keep asking you what your opinion is.I don't ask you to come up with an opinion that comes from an assumption.You are the one who desires to come up with an assumption.If in every possible context they contradict, then no it doesn't.Did you weigh up all the possible contexts and line then up?It's not even something you should have to think about.You really are a douchebag.things can't be the same and different depending on context.No one said they were the same and different at the same time.Stop saying that they mean something different and aren't the same.You're repetitive.Those two sentences that I had said fitted in with each other nicely.Except what is rude, etc.Judging people by their choice of words.People use whatever words they deem fit.It is rude to judge what people are saying by their choice of words.It implies that you understand what is going on in the other persons mind.You don't, so stop being rude.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

And nobody insists upon what the English language means other than you.You are wrong. We have tons of people on here who argue what words mean.You mean the pre-conceived notion that you had created in your head.It isn't pre-conceived. It is witnessed behavior.You merely try to state the opposite of everything I say without offering proof.Everything you have done on this website involves insane claims without any proof.You severely lack any common reasoning skills.Why is it that your arguments require extra reasoning? Can't you just write in a way that allows others to understand what you are thinking?No one said they were the same and different at the same time.You did say it. This is why I laughed at you for not knowing the meaning of the word you used. Those two sentences that I had said fitted in with each other nicely.You didn't explain how you thought they were different.Judging people by their choice of words.What am I supposed to judge you by? Your clothes?It implies that you understand what is going on in the other persons mind.Your words are supposed to convey what is going on in your mind. You should be judged poorly if you don't properly convey what you are thinking.You don't, so stop being rude.It is more rude to not even try.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You are wrong. We have tons of people on here who argue what words mean.I know.But I've never got into any of them.It isn't pre-conceived. It is witnessed behavior.Now your setting yourself up in a position of authority.Not a wise thing to do.Everything you have done on this website involves insane claims without any proof.That is an assertion.Not evidence.Why is it that your arguments require extra reasoning? Can't you just write in a way that allows others to understand what you are thinking?All my arguments stand on their own merit.You just add your own spin to them.You over-complicate what they mean.You did say it. This is why I laughed at you for not knowing the meaning of the word you used."This is why I laughed at you...".Yet again another display of quite a abysmal attitude.The sentences are referring to the same point, but in different ways.You didn't explain how you thought they were different.I never said they were different.Don't try to cause confusion.You are arguing that I implied those sentences were different.I am answering back by saying that they mean roughly the same.What am I supposed to judge you by? Your clothes?No, just don't judge at all.Something you need to learn.You need to work on your bad attitude to life.Your words are supposed to convey what is going on in your mind. You should be judged poorly if you don't properly convey what you are thinking.You don't judge what causes a man to say what he says.My words indeed have conveyed what is going on inside my mind.You just pretend that they don't.It is more rude to not even try.You haven't tried.You're just a troll.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

All my arguments stand on their own merit.All of your arguments are only backed up by your word. They have no merit. I am answering back by saying that they mean roughly the same.How?No, just don't judge at all.Something you need to learn.You need to work on your bad attitude to life.Sounds like you are judging me for my bad attitude just like the hypocrite you are.You haven't tried.You're just a troll.You haven't tried. I have asked you questions over and over to understand. I have tried quite a bit.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

All of your arguments are only backed up by your word. They have no merit.Yet again you are only claiming the opposite of what I am saying.You aren't providing any evidence for it.How?First of all, don't really know which sentence you are talking about, but I have checked all of my sentences and none of them contradict.Can you actually point out which words and which sentences in order to make some good sense?Sounds like you are judging me for my bad attitude just like the hypocrite you are.Another assertion.I say Pot meet Kettle.You haven't tried. I have asked you questions over and over to understand. I have tried quite a bit.Another assertion.If you really had asked many questions how come I barely see many question marks?I don't see any.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yet again you are only claiming the opposite of what I am saying.You aren't providing any evidence for it.Every time you have said that you can't find what you say anywhere on the internet is my evidence.First of all, don't really know which sentence you are talking about, but I have checked all of my sentences and none of them contradict.I always love to see you not know what you are talking about.Can you actually point out which words and which sentences in order to make some good sense?Me: Rude and respect are different things.You: They sure are.I know all about respect and disrespect, aka rudefulness."They sure are different", and "I know all about respect and disrespect, aka rudefulness."Another assertion.I say Pot meet Kettle.You weren't judging me?If you really had asked many questions how come I don't see many question marks?I don't see any.Apparently you are blind. I asked "How?" and you quoted it. You quoted me using a question mark. Don't you feel silly say that you haven't seen any?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Every time you have said that you can't find what you say anywhere on the internet is my evidence.It could only serve as evidence if I had actually said it.You pretend that I had said stuff that I hadn't said all the time.Why should we listen to you?I always love to see you not know what you are talking aboutYet again, another display of your bad attitude.Me: Rude and respect are different things.You: They sure are.I know all about respect and disrespect, aka rudefulness."They sure are different", and "I know all about respect and disrespect, aka rudefulness."You said that rude is not the same as respect.I also believe that rudeness is not the same as respect.I then said that disrespect/rudeness is not the same as respect.Do you get it now?Do you have trouble reading?You weren't judging me?Criticising your actionsis not the same act judging your character.Apparently you are blind. I asked "How?" and you quoted it. You quoted me using a question mark. Don't you feel silly say that you haven't seen any?I said that I had barely seen any at all.Which means that the word any had become emotive than literal.Were you too blind to spot the word *barely?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

It could only serve as evidence if I had actually said it.You have said it many times.You pretend that I had said stuff that I hadn't said all the time.Nope. But, you have done that to me quite a bit.Why should we listen to you?Because I don't make up fake facts like you.You said that rude is not the same as respect.I also believe that rudeness is not the same as respect.I then said that disrespect/rudeness is not the same as respect.Do you get it now?Do you have trouble reading?So, it measures the same thing just in the opposite fashion. Criticising your actionsis not the same act judging your character.In that case, I haven't judged you at all. I have only criticized you.I said that I had barely seen any at all.No, no you didn't.Which means that the word any had become emotive than literal.Actually it became stupid to add since it showed no purpose. You repeated yourself.Were you too blind to spot the word barely?You didn't use the word barely.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You have said it many times.Why can't you just stop all these assertions for once?Say something that inspires curiosity for once.Say something that actually gets people thinking.Be smart.Nope. But, you have done that to me quite a bit.Stop these Pot meet Kettle spins.They are quiet childlike.Why do you feel so inclined to repeat everything I say?Because I don't make up fake facts like you.Don't you believe in creativity when debating?Where is your intellectual curiosity for God's sake?So, it measures the same thing just in the opposite fashion.What measures the same thing?What measures something them in the opposite fashion?You're being too vague.Explain please.Unlike you, I don't go out of my way to make assumptions about what another poster means.In that case, I haven't judged you at all. I have only criticized you.You have called me quite a few things.You have also accused me of having a bad reputation.Sounds like a judgement.And they aren't facts.No, no you didn't.Did you skip the word "barely"?What other assumption am I supposed to make right now?Actually it became stupid to add since it showed no purpose. You repeated yourself.It's good to reiterate something in order to clarify a statement for the sake of someone else.Just repeating something as ones primary argument is what gets someone nowhere.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

There is nothing that inspires curiosity in dead walls like you.Don't you believe in creativity when debating?Where is your intellectual curiosity for God's sake?Making up pure bullshit is not creativity.Did you skip the word "barely"?What other assumption am I supposed to make right now?You didn't use the word barely. I didn't skip the use of the word barely. It was just another one of your lies.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

There is nothing that inspires curiosity in dead walls like you.It's not me that's a dead wall, CartMan.Stop staring at the dead wall.Making up pure bullshit is not creativityWould you classify yourself as somehow being creative?Tell us a good story, create a good narrative for a change.You didn't use the word barely. I didn't skip the use of the word barely. It was just another one of your lies
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

It's not me that's a dead wall, CartMan.Stop staring at the dead wall.I am staring at you, dumb shit.Would you classify yourself as somehow being creative?Tell us a good story, create a good narrative for a change.There once was a bird that got stuck in a snow storm. She couldn't move at all. She decided to huff and puff and blow the snow away, but it was of no use. She then decided she should lie as much as possible. She started telling the most fanciful lives. Since she was so full of hot air she was able to melt all the snow. That bird decided to go through life living every day being prepared for a blizzard.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I am staring at you, dumb shit.You are staring at me, but a dead wall is placed in front of me preventing you from seeing me properly.There once was a bird that got stuck in a snow storm. She couldn't move at all. She decided to huff and puff and blow the snow away, but it was of no use. She then decided she should lie as much as possible. She started telling the most fanciful lives. Since she was so full of hot air she was able to melt all the snow. That bird decided to go through life living every day being prepared for a blizzard.That's not too bad at all.What happens the bird next?I want to hear more of the story.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You are staring at me, but a dead wall is placed in front of me preventing you from seeing me properly.Yep, it is never your fault.That's not too bad at all.What happens the bird next?I want to hear more of the story.The little bird decided to go around talking to all the other animals she could find. The other animals were having educated informed discussions and the little bird wanted to be a part of it. But, since the little bird was still affected by her previous snow trauma she continued lying to release hot air. The other animals tried to help the little bird, but the bird wouldn't listen. It turned out the little bird got some ice in her ears. The ice in her ears wouldn't melt because she was constantly letting out all of her hot air. The other animals tried to explain to the little bird that she needed to stop talking long enough to have the ice in her ears melt. Sadly the little bird was quite stubborn. The little bird continued to spew her hot air lies. Then one magical day, the little bird accidentally flew into a tree. The little bird had minor injuries, but chipped her beak. She was no longer able to tell lies and her ears started to clear up. The little bird finally started hearing the other animals. Once the little bird was able to hear the other animals clearly her world changed. She was much happier being educated by the more informed animals, and she was able to give up her lying ways.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yep, it is never your fault.Oh well.The little bird decided to go around talking to all the other animals she could find. The other animals were having educated informed discussions and the little bird wanted to be a part of it. But, since the little bird was still affected by her previous snow trauma she continued lying to release hot air. The other animals tried to help the little bird, but the bird wouldn't listen. It turned out the little bird got some ice in her ears. The ice in her ears wouldn't melt because she was constantly letting out all of her hot air. The other animals tried to explain to the little bird that she needed to stop talking long enough to have the ice in her ears melt. Sadly the little bird was quite stubborn. The little bird continued to spew her hot air lies. Then one magical day, the little bird accidentally flew into a tree. The little bird had minor injuries, but chipped her beak. She was no longer able to tell lies and her ears started to clear up. The little bird finally started hearing the other animals. Once the little bird was able to hear the other animals clearly her world changed. She was much happier being educated by the more informed animals, and she was able to give up her lying ways.I like the story.what happens next?Yes, I like the analogy, lol.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

No. If you don't want a baby, use contraception. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

And when that fails? Or when you are trying for a baby, then abruptly your social and economic status changes? Or you're raped? Or any one of another hundred reasons why a person could find themselves unwillingly pregnant?Understand that I don't think anyone would support someone getting dozens of abortions because they like banging random people without protection. That's a horrible thing to do; it's wasteful and hurtful and pointless. People support abortion because we understand that, sometimes, it's the best damn choice available to the potential parent.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

That is not an excuse for murder. Use multiple forms of contraception.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Okay, that's a good response to "what if the condom breaks", but it doesn't respond to any the other situations
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You have the right to your opinion. Abortion is the murder of an unborn child. If you are worriued about contraceptive failure, use contraception.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Saying it is murder is an opinion. An opinion that isntshared by the legal systems of most civilised countries.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

"If you are worried about contraceptive failure, use contraception"Did that make any sense to you when you wrote it out?You've literally just said "if you're concerned the condom might break and the pill might not work, wear a condom and go on the pill". I'm at a loss. What point were you trying to make here?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

If you are worried about contraceptive failure, use multiple forms of contraception. Murder is not a right.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Multiple forms of contraception can still fail. Even if this isn't the case, there are still other circumstances where an abortion would be the best option.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You have the right to your opinion. There is no excuse for murder.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

That's a pretty poor response for a debate website. Of course we're all rntitled to our opinions, but aren't we here to debate them?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

It is not a poor response for a debate site. The fact remains that you have the right to your opinion, and the fact remains that abortion is not a right.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

The fact remains that abortion is a right.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

No it isn't. One does not have the right to kill babies. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You have the right to your opinion.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

And you have the right to yours. Show me where the Constition says that abortion is a right.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

14th Amendment.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

That has nothing to do with abortion. Abortion is not mentioned even once. We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Roe v. Wade is protected under the 14th Amendment.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

You have the right to your opinion. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roev.Wade
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Relevant information is found in sentence number 3. That's 2 3/4 more sentences than LibProlifer can handle.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yeah but it's highlighted so that should help.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Show me where the Constitution says that abortion isn't a right.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

The burden of proof is on you to prove that abortion is a right. You can't prove a negative.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yes or no: Can you prove that abortion is a right? .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Yes or no: Can you prove that abortion is not a right?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

The burden of proof is not on the one making a negative claim, it is on the one making the positive claim, and I will take your burden of proof fallacy as a no.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

So you can't prove that abortion is a right? .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

So you can't prove that abortion is not a right?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

The burden of proof is on you to prove that abortion is a right. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Roe v. Wade is his is proof you retard. Now why dont you have a go at actually debating for once rather than just trying to name fallacies and telling people they are entitled to their own opinion. I can see what the FBI allegedly mean now.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Wimping out of the argument by saying "you have the right to your opinion, but you're wrong" is a piss-poor reply on a debate website. We're here to debate, not yell our opinions at each other then scurry off when someone asks hard questions.Abortion is a right, it's been demonstrated to you several times on this thread. You can disagree with it, but that doesn't change the fact that, at current, in your country, it is a right.
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

I am not obligated to agree wiuth you. If you can't handle disagreement, why are you here?
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Work on your reading comprehension skills matey. Nobody minds if you disagree, we just wish you'd explain your reasoning or shut the hell up. It's a debate site. Debate, or go shrek yourself
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

Fact: I read your entire statement. .
Debate: Is abortion a Constitutional right?
Side: ars ago

6/10 troll, got me to reply multiple times but picked a bland and unoriginal trolling topic.