azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

You are the one who believes it not me. Why do you believe in unicorns?SighI never said that I believe in one. But I do said that if they cannot be disproven, they can be proven.that is not what you asked me. You ask avesatanas if he believes that to be true. I responded that YES he believes that.You then asked me to prove that statement. But you were asking me to prove that I was right when I said he believed that statement. When he came back to confirm that he did believe that statement, it proved that I was right.Correction: I asked to prove your statement that God can be disproven if you can explain the process. But you replied by using Avesatanas.Pardon me, but I fail to see the point of this argument. Will it be rude if I request to just skip this one?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

SighI never said that I believe in one. But I do said that if they cannot be disproven, they can be proven.So, you don't believe in God either? You just think it is equally likely for Him to exist and not exist.Correction: I asked to prove your statement that God can be disproven if you can explain the process. But you replied by using Avesatanas.No, you wish you had, but that is not what you asked. You simply asked if he believed that. All I did was tell you that he does believe that stuff, not that what he believes is true.Pardon me, but I fail to see the point of this argument.I have explained it to you 3 times at least.Will it be rude if I request to just skip this one?Yes, if you don't admit you made a mistake.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

So, you don't believe in God either? You just think it is equally likely for Him to exist and not exist.No my friend, I was merely sharing the logic of how the truthfulness and ridiculousness of a claim works. Simple as thatYes, if you don't admit you made a mistake.In exchange for a peaceful argument? Then sure, whatever
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

No my friend, I was merely sharing the logic of how the truthfulness and ridiculousness of a claim works. Simple as thatDo you believe God exists, or do you believe God has an equal likelihood of both existing and not existing? In exchange for a peaceful argument? Then sure, whateverFuck you you whore. I want a real fucking apology. You asked a fucking question and someone answered it.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Do you believe God exists, or do you believe God has an equal likelihood of both existing and not existing?Both :)
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

That's impossible. If you believe that God exists, that means you believe that there is at least 51% of a chance of Him existing. If you lean to one side or the other, you clearly favor that side. If you actually that it was equal you could not say that you believe in God or not.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Not if you are not biased :)
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

True, but you are biased by saying that you believe God exists, right?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Being open for arguments is never a biased thing
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

(Is the existence of unicorns 50/50? Is the existence of leprechauns 50/50? Is the existence of mermaids 50/50?)Your argument is inaccurate unicorns have been proven to not exist as well as leprechauns and mermaids. God or gods (depending on what you believe in) have not been disproven.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Sorry, But That Is Not True. How Have Unicorns Been disproven? We Can Use The Same Reasoning For God, Right?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Weve been all across the world. We would've seen at least one by now.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Not true. There are new species of animals discovered all the time. We don't see God at all, yet He exists. Doesn't seem fair to me.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

1.of course I don't deny that.2.If you agree that unicorns have a chance to exist what was the point of using it against the existence of god in the first place? Your sort of contradicting yourself here.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

1. Ok, so you agree God doesn't exist.2. Actually the point of my argument is that Atheism and Theism don't have an equal chance of being true. If you disagree than you are saying that unicorns do have a 50/50 chance of existing. Since you agree that they don't, you are saying that I am right and Atheism and Theism don't have an equal chance of being true.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

1.facepalm I agree that new species of animals are found all the time where in my argumentation did I say I agree god doesn't exist?2.Thats not what I am implying at all actually.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

1. Sorry, my bad. You said unicorns exist. I made the jump that you believe God doesn't exist. We will get there, don't worry.2. I say that not everything that someone says exists has a 50/50 chance of existing. That's what you guys are saying. You are trying to say that a non existent God has a possibility of existing simply because you say it is possible for Him to exist. By rejecting the idea of unicorns you are saying that the idea of God can be rejected just as easily as well. You don't quite understand that though. Either way, we are only discussing whether there is a 50/50 possibility of God. I say that God does not have a 50/50 chance of existing because I don't think He exists. But, you can think the same thing. You don't think that God is 50/50 either, but this is because you believe God actually exists. Either way, we both agree that God is not 50/50.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I never rejected the idea of unicorns I mean yeah sure I said we've never found one but I never rejected the idea.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

OK, so you agree that it is possible for unicorns to exist just as much as it is possible that they don't?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Do you agree unicorns have a chance to exist as well?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

No, I know unicorns don't exist, I am not crazy.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Then why were you defending the fact they could exist in the first place. Your not making much sense.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

I am saying that if God has a possibility of existing that unicorns must have a possibility of existing by the same logic. Since you say that unicorns don't exist, you are saying that God doesn't exist. See, I told you we would get here. ;) I was trying to use unicorns to point out the silliness of the claim in God. I am arguing that unicorns exist if God exists. I only argued it because of your claim that God exists. Does that make sense?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Like I said I never said there wasn't a chance unicorns cant exist.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Interesting. Someone hijacked your account and wrote "Your argument is inaccurate unicorns have been proven to not exist as well as leprechauns and mermaids." Maybe you can change your password or something.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Its been disproven but I never said there wasn't any chance for one to exist.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Do you not know what you were saying? How can you say that the existence of unicorns has been disproven and also say that it is possible for unicorns to exist? You don't make any sense.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Well some Ideas such as creationism have been disproven but does that mean god himself has been?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

If creationism has been disproven, is it possible for creationism to still be correct? That is what you are saying about unicorns.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Wait... unicorns don't exist? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I don't even want to know what you were hoping that unicorns would do for you. ;)
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I'd put an American flag on it's horn and ride around saying "Murica".
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Fuck yeah. :)
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

One makes a giant assumption using a god that hasnt even been demonstrated to be true and defies all laws of physics and pretty much everything else we know about our reality. The other goes along perfectly with everything we know and makes zero assumptions...it isnt rocket science. Saying "god did it" will NEVER be just as good as a real scientific theory. And I suppose that you are saying that as long as you can explain the process, God isnt there?Until he is proven to be real no he fucking isnt. You do realize science doesnt have to cater to your idiotic beliefs right? Sorry to be harsh but explaining this for what seems like the hundreth time is pissing me off. Yes, as long as we can explain the process perfectly and within it theres no need for a supernatural catalyst of any kind then yeah god isnt there. And even if there WAS a need for some kind of supernatural catalyst until you PROVE that it was any given god that caused it, it STILL wouldnt be taken seriously.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

One makes a giant assumption using a god that hasnt even been demonstrated to be true and defies all laws of physics and pretty much everything else we know about our reality.I gave you the research about the Guadalupe. You never replied back.You know what that means, right?Saying "god did it" will NEVER be just as good as a real scientific theory.The Chruch and the State was divided for a reason. And so goes for Science and Religion.It is not a good idea to use it on other territoriesUntil he is proven to be real no he fucking isnt.i can easily return it back as "Until you confirmed that there is nothing after death, God exists"Sorry to be harsh but explaining this for what seems like the hundreth time is pissing me off.Consider me as a student who thirst for wisdom. I desire you to enlighten meYes, as long as we can explain the process perfectly and within it theres no need for a supernatural catalyst of any kind then yeah god isnt there.Under this logic, I question your definition of "Supernatural". Can you prove that it is a natural and normal thing for living creatures to exist from nonliving things that was created out of nothing?And at the same time, I ask again, what makes you think that the existance of a divine being is dependent on his ability to defy physics
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

What is the relevance of a surprisingly resiliant piece of cloth (that they dont allow any real scientists to test in a lab)? That isnt proof of god.You read the article, you should know that they tested it in a lab, by NASA themselves. Only to find more things that defies physics. (You can do more research if you want)I fail to see how that doesn't prove GodSo why do you keep arguing that religious ideas are 50/50 with scientific ones?It is a friendly correction. Do not take it seriouslyNo you actually cant because you havent proven that god to exist. Youre the one with the positive claim that a god exists. It isnt our job to then prove that theres nothing after death , its your job to prove there is something.DoneDoneI am open for arguments. Feel free to give itThe most accurate definition in the context of this debate would probably be the second, but one applies when were talking about the supernatural being a God.Abiogenesis theory is what youre looking for. Science cant declare fact, but we have good evidence for it. And even if we didnt it would still be accepted before the supernatural assumptions and hypothesis of religion.I still fail to see anyway that the concept of life out of nothingness does not belong to the supernatural phenomenonBecause thats what makes him supernatural. He is commonly defined as being outside of space and time.Correction: It is the existence of an afterlife that confirms his existence. Or at least, thats how Deists defines their belief
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

I fail to see how that doesn't prove GodHeres the root of the problem. Your standard of evidence is WAY lower than mine and the rest of normal people. Wierd tapestry with strange qualities = THERE MUST BE AN ALL KNOWING TIMELESS IMATERIAL SPACE WIZARD WHO MADE THE UNIVERSE. Its a non-sequitur.http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/michael martin/heaven.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEWztlIteo4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLtSfU3u_AI still fail to see anyway that the concept of life out of nothingness does not belong to the supernatural phenomenon....what?Correction: It is the existence of an afterlife that confirms his existence. Or at least, thats how Deists defines their beliefbut an afterlife isnt confirmed or even supported by anything. so by this definition he cant ever be confirmed. So since he cant ever be proven then saying god did it is the equivalent of a wild guess. Finally were on the same page
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Your standard of evidence is WAY lower than mine and the rest of normal people.If you cannot disprove a small evidence, what makes you think you needed more?Nice links you gave. But im afraid they are off topic and none of them disproved the Guadalupe.I dont mind arguing them with you though, if thats what you want.....what?I was saying, if life can exist out of nothing, how come it does not belong in the definition of Supernatural?but an afterlife isnt confirmed or even supported by anything.i gave you the links. But it appears like you just skipped it.I hope you know what that means
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

We had this debate long ago, right? But you stopped replying. I dont mind repeating the argument though, if thats what you want
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

If we did i dont remember. i mightve lost track of it and if i did i apologize. its up to you i dont mind either way.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I will accept that as reasonable enough to repeat our argument thenI disagree. Its all about likelyhood. Is it more likely that everything we know about the natural world and the laws of physics will get thrown out the window in favor of bronze age myths...Religion is not dependent on the concept of magic but by the existance of an afterlife. It is possible for God to exist without any need for divine intervention. But...I guess those exists
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Religion is not dependent on the concept of magic but by the existance of an afterlife.Wrong. Religions are dependent on some form of supernatural beliefs, not necessarily an afterlife. IE: religions that teach reincarnationIt is possible for God to exist without any need for divine interventionTrue but then what use is that god? And were not arguing for a do nothing god, were arguing about THE god who created everything.Btw your link said page couldnt be found.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Wrong. Religions are dependent on some form of supernatural beliefs, not necessarily an afterlife. IE: religions that teach reincarnationI see no difference.Magic is still unnecessary for the maintanance of a religion. As long as mankind does not know what exists after death, religion will always existTrue but then what use is that god? And were not arguing for a do nothing god, were arguing about THE god who created everything.Its called "Deism". Its a belief in the existance of a divine being that created the world but does not intervene in its growth. It is a belief in a god but denies existance of miraclesBtw your link said page couldnt be found.Its a download link for a pdf file provided by NASA about Guadalupe (which I gave you before). But heres an article that might amuse you.You may do more research if you wish though
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Its a download link for a pdf file provided by NASA about Guadalupe (which I gave you before).But heres an article that might amuse you.You may do more research if you wish thoughI love how you cling to hope that your God exists. You actually believe that God has no time to help all of the starving people, but does have the time to create Guadalupe's eyes. I am really glad that your great being is doing lots with His power.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I love how you cling to hope that your God exists.Dont you think its about time to stop the denials and face the facts?You actually believe that God has no time to help all of the starving people, Indeed. Christianity are a fool for thinking that God is a good person
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Dont you think its about time to stop the denials and face the facts?I have evidence on my side, you have a strange painting. So, I have faced the facts, when will you.Indeed. Christianity are a fool for thinking that God is a good personOk, so believing that your God is not feeding starving kids in Africa means you think He is good? Well, I haven't fed a single African kid, worship me.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

I have evidence on my side,Mind if you can share it?Ok, so believing that your God is not feeding starving kids in Africa means you think He is good? Well, I haven't fed a single African kid, worship me.Call me again once you managed to create life out of dust and call a flood to genocide civilization
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Mind if you can share it?We have explained the previous workings of God so well as humans that it no longer requires evidence, it is accepted fact. Open a science book. You will find all the evidence you need. Almost everything in a science book used to be explained by God.Call me again once you managed to create life out of dust and call a flood to genocide civilizationSo, I guess genocide is ok if you created everything. I like how you love a genocidal maniac. You are actually trying to convince me that their is an equal chance that the world came about by random chance and a genocidal lunatic is responsible for it. Awesome.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

We have explained the previous workings of God so well as humans that it no longer requires evidence, it is accepted fact. I gave you the link for the Guadalupe, and Eben Alexander, can I hear the explanations behind it?So, I guess genocide is ok if you created everything.I believe in a God, but i do not deny his cruel ways. Is there a problem?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

I gave you the link for the Guadalupe, and Eben Alexander, can I hear the explanations behind it?Your only accomplishment for God is Guadalupe, a worthless achievement that does not better mankind at all. And Eben made up everything after his brain started functioning again, he has no memories of it.I believe in a God, but i do not deny his cruel ways. Is there a problem?Why should I be forced to admit that it is possible that the entire universe was basically created by a genocidal maniac? Why would you want to believe that there exists a great being that is also a genocidal maniac? I can't understand why anyone would want to believe that the were created by the whim of a mad man.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Your only accomplishment for God is Guadalupe, a worthless achievement that does not better mankind at all.When was the last time God benefited mankind anyway?The only thing that matters is for me to prove his existence, his holy name on the other hand, is something that does not exist.Why should I be forced to admit that it is possible that the entire universe was basically created by a genocidal maniac? Why would you want to believe that there exists a great being that is also a genocidal maniac? I can't understand why anyone would want to believe that the were created by the whim of a mad man.I never desire him to exist, it is just fairly obvious that he isnt a good person. I have no intention of denying the truth. Is there a problem with it?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

When was the last time God benefited mankind anyway?Never, why call Him God then?The only thing that matters is for me to prove his existence, his holy name on the other hand, is something that does not exist.But, you haven't. You have proven that a supernatural knitter exists that can make Guadalupe, not really a God to anyone else.I never desire him to exist, it is just fairly obvious that he isnt a good person. I have no intention of denying the truth. Is there a problem with it?I don't feel that this has been your actual attitude, other than that, no.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

Never, why call Him God then?Because he created everything. Blame the English dictionary for the lack of appropriate nounsBut, you haven't. You have proven that a supernatural knitter exists that can make Guadalupe, not really a God to anyone else.So...can you explain how it does not proves God?I don't feel that this has been your actual attitude, other than that, no.Are you gonna deny God's cruelty?
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: False

Because he created everything. Blame the English dictionary for the lack of appropriate nounsNo, in this scenario we have decided that he did not create everything. We know that nature created everything and God is just standing around knitting. So...can you explain how it does not proves God?Because you only call something God if it created everything and this is by no means proof that the thing that created Guadalupe also created the universe.Are you gonna deny God's cruelty?Sort of, yes. He doesn't exist so He can't be cruel.
Debate: Atheism and Theism have equal chances of being true
Side: True

No, in this scenario we have decided that he did not create everything. We know that nature created everything and God is just standing around knitting.Oh, then may I hear your explanation for how everything came from nothing?Because you only call something God if it created everything and this is by no means proof that the thing that created Guadalupe also created the universe.sighThe Guadalupe isnt God, it is a miracle feat that defies the laws of Physics. It is an evidence that the paranormal exist and stunned scientists who questioned it.Now unless you have something that can prove its nothing out of the ordinary, then I am all ears