azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

No, we should not protect the environment because protecting the environment will cost lots of money that we don't have. America is in debt 19.8 trillion dollars and if we put our main focus on the environment instead of focusing on the money our economy will collapse and millions of people in the U.S. will be affected.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

i love how you google searched all of that up but any who it was still a very good disagreement point
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Why are you saying it will cost a lot of money? Obviously it will BUT if you're just thinking about the money then you are just a selfish person.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

why would we invest in something that everybody wont follow along with it
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

We have to invest to live and if you don't then we'll die and it'll be your fault
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Greed is the root of all evil. Only after the last tree has been cut down. Only after the last river has been poisoned. Only after the last fish has been caught, only then will you find out that money cannot be eaten. Earth provides enough for every man's need, but not for everyone's greed!
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

would you rather have no job, no money because the economy is failing and take care of the environment or not take care of the environment and have money to support your self, put food in your stomach, and clothes on your back. you can not have a healthy environment without money
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

The real question is why is it all about money. we don't need money to save our community. Why do people like you always think money revolves around the world. If we put in effort we can definitely make this environment
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

we need money to give our technology to do things like these you guys need the electric cars and solar panels. You need the government to help invest to go green
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Why do we need electric cars ? Isn't cars that run of gas enough? See people like you get me irritated . You would look stupid , dumb , greedy, and selfish driving in an electric car knowing that your community and environment needs help
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

Do you know how dumb and ignorant you sound since people use transportation like cars that run off of gas we could create a more car that could be clean and car that could benefit the environment which are ELECTRIC CARS.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Nigga do you want me to tell you how dumb you sound and i guess i'm ignorant for trying to make this pace better. If anyone is ignorant its you because you would need electricity to charge those car and electricity doesn't come free dummy
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

and for your information it cost 45 trillion dollars to go green so unless you green people have half that much money then speak to me because the US is in debt of 19 trillion dollors
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

Who cares about this world i just want it to end already life is great on this planet. Why live on earth if it already look horrible. I hate this planet with all my heart!
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Do you really know how dumb and stupid you sound right now ?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

yes you do need money if you want to save the economy. clean energy isn't free. also if we were to stop using cars that burn fuel or get rid of power plants or stop doing those missions that cut down trees we would put thousands of people of out of there jobs and one of the leading problems in America is there not being enough jobs in America for people
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

No you do not need money , kids in Africa barely have money but they are still surviving. Does it take money to recycle ? Does it take money to grow crops ? No
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

it does not matter how many it cost zenobia one little thing make the change to our earth
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

it does matter when your in debt 19.8 trillions of dollars
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

I disagree its not right that we have to only make money in this world. Plus the only reason people get money is because they cut down trees in order to make money. Many Know that the trees that are living are giving us oxygen and also the oceans. Money will never be more important then human lives or even animal lives. Many living creatures in earth are just to important to be extinct.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

you do have to make money if you want to keep the economy form collasping
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

The US is small in comparison to the entire planet! If we do not protect the environment, we will lose more than trillions of dollars. Think beyond your bubble, think globally.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

hi coooooleyyyyy im sebasatiannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

i love youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu u the best teacher ever
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

we should not protect the environment because every time we try everybody fails to help others protect the environment.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

We shouldn't protect this earth because this earth doesn't even matter to me anymore. This environment isn't even more important then money. No one can defeat what money can get us. $cash is the best forget all these animals let them become extinct.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

i think we shouldnt be helping the environment because people would keep messing it up throwing garbage and not taking care of the earth
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

We should no waste time on something that is already lost.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

you think it's lost, negative people like you are lost in that mindset
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

It's is lost..do you even have a plan to make this world a better place for us.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

i know my plan isn't to sit around and wait for the world to end, that's what you re doing
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

do you even have a plan, all your saying is we need to make the world a better place but are you even cleaning up after yourself?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

totally agree all this is already lost so why waste more time then what we already wasted
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

i'm agree with that because theres people that dont care about the earth
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

I understand we all as a whole need to help of whats gong on in our community but thing is we should be more persuading to the people that just doesn't care about or just has not thought towards it
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

Should we protect the environment? Why are all people being accused automatically of not protecting or improper interactions that are responsible with environment and what effect will this basic principle have on any protection created?As for climate change this is an unconstitutional declaration as it does not match the public claims it is openly saying or providing as common defense. Climate manipulation is what the public describes as a basic principle of the accusations being made publicly. What has been now excluded is all accusation of all natural possibilities to an issue,as witnesses can now suggest any issues that start with only human possibilities. What is being asked or said publicly is what can manipulate environment and what can change temperatures? Asking a witness what they, see not telling the witness what they should see, or must see. An impartial search has not been narrowed, or a path of cause fabricated in behalf of obstructed in any way. Should you protect the environment is a separation based on basic principle and legal precedent. Should we protect the environment is a much complex principle with legal precedent. Do we know for a fact those who make the claim do not contribute to the issue in question?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

i don't understand your point of view but I guess you have issues.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

yessssss 100000000000% facts u got a point he has issues.........
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

yeah , yeah , yeah . Thanks for the copy and paste . xoxo
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

likaa quiet you dont know how he got that answer thank you
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

Test to basic principle applies to science as well as Constitutional law. What manipulates temperate fastest increasing or decreasing Co2 or moving volumes of hot or cold temperature? You have made an evaluation without providing an impartial base line.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

there are approximately 10 million species of animals, plants and insects known to man if you destroy the forest if you destroy the forest you will also destroy them and will also effect the food chain for the other animals leading to all the animals to die, destroying the forest will also lead to c02 going up into the atmosphere and will end up destroying our only protection and will let anything that is in space come down to earth without even trying to destroy it and we cant do anything about it. It will also mess up our gravity rotation. Destroying the forest will not only leave the animals homeless but also the native people who live there which is also inhuman.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

did you ask a witness? you're stating what you know but did you ask a witness?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

yes, and listened as well. I will ask you a simple question. What makes something colder or warmer faster adding heat or cold temperature or adding Co2?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

my question to you is what causes temperature changes? what causes the weather patterns? that is my question to you, if you don't know that then my time is being wasted. I'd also like to meet this witness of yours.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Why is this question being asked SIR?? This question has nothing to do with saving the world . Are you high or something ?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

1) Global warming is the result of increase in the earth’s average surface temperature due to greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. These gases are required for the presence of human life on earth. However, global warming is happening due to over-remittance of these gases.2) Emissions like carbon dioxide, nitrogenous oxide and other greenhouses gases will remain in the atmosphere for many years making impossible to eliminate global warming for several decades.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

but where are the witnesses because this environment is already out of control this has no way of getting fix
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

The environment is not out of control it was never in our control the argument is that as a society we should have the foresight to understand cataclysmic events and how they can be prepared for. Asking people to fix nature is unacceptable asking society to prepare for events which pose serious threat to human life prudent to insure liberty.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

Are you claiming man has no control? Man has no free agency?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

You just repeated what Kim said so if you want a real argument come up with your own statement
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

she said did you ask any witnesses i said where they at???????
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

First you need to fix that grammar because it's where are they at not "where they at" so once you go back to English class and learn then talk to me
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

well that's the same thing where they at or where are they at? but how was that saying the same thing as kim
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

I was talking about when you were talking about witnesses and now i'm talking about how you don't even have proper grammar and also you want to actually want to start then lets go anything you want to ague about
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

let's go then i'm not afraid we could argue about anything you want to argue about
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

It's up to you because i don't want to make your little brain hurt with all the things about to say
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

my brain not gonna hurt yours is probably the one that is going to hurt
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC states: it is a greater than a 90 percent certainty that emissions of heat-trapping gases from human activities have caused “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century. We all know that warming and cooling has happened in the past, and long before humans were around. Many factors (called “climate drivers”) can influence Earth’s climate such as changes in the sun’s intensity and volcanic eruptions, as well as heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

2/3 of the earth surfaces is water. Water transfers a far greater amount of heat than air. The report is mathematically questionable considering the amount of water that is displaced with much colder temperatures yearly in the same timeframe. The rates of the temperature displaced into the oceans can also account for readings of trapped gasses released from water. Add to this the efforts put into manipulating the protein skimming that happens by sandbars on shore lines. Energy being chemically displaced creates additional heat. The additional Co2 simply traps that heat.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Climate Change is NOT a political issue. It is a moral reality. "We are running the most dangerous experiment in history right now, which is to see how much carbon dioxide the atmosphere can handle before there is an environmental catastrophe." We are already in the sixth extinction, will man go extinct too? I think Neil deGrasse Tyson said it best, "I'm often asked whether I belive in global warming. I now just reply with the question, Do you belive in gravity?" So my quesiton to you is, Do you belive in gravity?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

I knowYou seeSomehow the world will change for meAnd be so wonderful;Live lifeBreathe airI know somehow we're gonna get thereAnd feel so wonderful;I will make you change your mind -These things happen all the timeAnd it's all real -I'm telling you just how I feel; so[Chorus]Wake up the members of my nationIt's your time to beThere's no chance unless you take one every time;Just see the brighter side of every situationSome things are meant to beSo give your best and leave the rest to me[Verse 2]I knowIt's timeTo raise the hand that draws the lineAnd be so wonderful;Golden sunshineI know somehow it's gonna be mineAnd feel so wonderful;Show me what you can becomeThere's a dream in everyoneAnd it's all real -I'm telling you just how I feel; so[Chorus][Bridge]So make it right(Maybe you're right)And see it through(You've got to...)Know you won't be free until you -[Outro]Wake up the members of my nationIt's your time to beThere's no chance unless you take one every timeJust see the brighter side of every situationSome things are meant to be, soGive your best and leave the rest to meLeave it all to meLeave it all to meJust leave it all to me...
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

No I do not believe in gravity. I can describe gravity and do not rely on a shared opinion. The issue in you comparison is I among few people have a theory identifying the source of gravity. Thus know why we have the effects and the basic principles to how it is shared in the Universe. I do not believe in gravity. I know and understand Gravity.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

I really don't understand what your saying. So I think your just to weird to me for how you respond to what ever you say.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Basic principle.We use salt to melt ice in the winter. Ice and snow that had been frozen for months now moves into the ocean in days. The temperature of this water is 7 to 12 degrees colder and is moved months faster than it ever has been. All of this to make the smaller energy saving cars capable of traveling in colder weather.Co2 gas does not move nearly this amount of heat variation.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

This is the Leftwing hypocrites for you.These absolute fools supposedly care so much for the environment and animals, but they support No Restriction abortions of viable babies.Do any of you fools see your totally misplaced twisted priorities?
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: Yes

Needing clear direction to achieve a common defense for general welfare does not make a person a fool.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

There is noting wrong with caring about clean air and clean water.The point I will always make, is that I will never trust a person who pretends to have such passion for our environment, but lacks the simple humanity not to care for the least among us.The Left's priorities are totally screwed up. Yes, the environment is important, but compared to purposely supporting the killing of even our late term viable babies here today, it is not even in the same ballpark.No one denies we should address any proven man made causes of any permenant damage to this planet, but to trust these environmental activists who lack the simple humanity to support every innocent person's right to life, makes them not worth listening to.You show me a true Prolife environmentalist, and he will be someone I might actually trust.
Debate: Should we protect the environment?
Side: No

The debate is Constitutional Law cannot be legally used to enforce protection. Law can be legally legislated to create impartial separation by degrees publicly. Your confusion is being made with religious law which is proclamation on something as an effort to fabricate legal. This is trying to using law to create an immunity to itself. This type of legislation is incriminating to corruption by building on hypocrisy with in law.Should you develop Constitutional laws which provide impartial tests to separation based on nature and environment? Yes. Should we protect the environment? No. You can if you want, but please do not be surprised if you end up in court or jail. And, please do not include me. As this type of inclusion ends up in most cases of a group of people stating to another they didn't understand what was being said. Law is meant to be tested by United States Constitution as an impartial common defense to the general welfare.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

I think people have a right to their views no matter how ridiculous or distateful and I will defend that right, but just because that is my view they have to accept that I wont keep my views to myself and will tell people they are being intolerant and what I think of that as is my right.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

Well said. I not as tolerant as you though. Shrugs. .
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: no

People do have the right to their views no matter what. A person shouldn't have something they believe innsnatched from them simple becasue we think of it as some form of intolerence. People are free and should remain that way. That's how things were started and how things will always be.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

it depends on what the intolerant are doing. if they are not lashing out physically or harming those that they dont like then they should be entitled to their opinion no matter how stupid it is
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

I think we should tolerate everything that doesn't have an undesirable unconsented effect on anyone else. Beyond that I completely intolerant.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

We should tolerate intolerance. Our country was built on freedoms that the government cannot take away from us. It is our right to use that power to better our country. Some politicians say we need to limit something, but that is not the American way. America is a place where people can live the life they want to, and say what they want without the fear of being persecuted. If the government tries to take away our rights, then we will offend many people who feel that their rights are infringed on. Henry Louis Gates Jr. said, “Censorship is to art as lynching is to justice.” George Washington said,“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." If we limit speech, we cannot fight for what we want. Our 1st President said that we need to stand up for what we believe in. If we dont, the government will walk all over us, and turn us slowly into doing whatever they say.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

Would the government be completely restricting speech, or simply taking precautions against what could happen with dangerous speech? People still have the freedom to say what they want. The line they cross is when they take action on their words.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

People should be entitled to their religion and views no matter the circumstances (race, sexuality, gender, ect.). The more people get oppressed, the angrier and more radical they will get. If you shut others put, their attitudes will remain the same, dislike towards whoever or whatever is restricting them. Restricting religion and freedom of speech will create a tyranny of the majority. It is not up to one person or a group of people to decide what defines intolerance.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: no

Wouldn't you agree that an innocent person getting harmed because of the never-ending tolerance crosses into the territory of intolerance?
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

Yes because, fighting fire with fire brings double damage. And water for fire evaporates the heat.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

We already do on some level in the U.S.Here we don't allow public discrimination due to out rule against intolerance and fairness, but in your private time, our can teach your kids whatever you want.Though I am on the yes side I really don't believe intolerance is a good thing. We should find a way to teach against it, because the parents that teach their kids, that something is wrong with a group of people, grow up to believe it, and then follow suit to teach their children that. Basically, but not always, breeding racism.
Debate: Should we tolerate intolerance?
Side: yes

Well that is not entirely true. Some states in the U.S. have passed a law where workers like waitresses and such can refuse to service people based on their religious or personal views. An example is a Catholic waiter can refuse to serve a gay person. So there is some form of public discrimination in some places but not all.