Debate: are scientist and science good for the world
Side: science is good for world

"science it is engineered to work against our biases, peer reviews plays a part in deterring bias"No matter what, as long as it is humans(with personal feelings or opinions) involved and not robots, knowingly or unknowingly, there will be some bias work somewhere. But you don't expect anyone to come for confession; do you?"Actually god is not mentioned whatsoever in either theory because god is not scientifically verifiable,"Scientists who support evolution have given independent definitions of who God is, and it brings suspicions about the motives behind their theories."What are you talking about? The theory of evolution makes perfect sense and the evidence is well established, the experts don't disagree on evolution the consensus is strong, the only objectors are the fundamentalist christian groups."Who are you trying to lie to? That the experts accept it......ignoring what the fundamentalist christians group thinks, is it 'all' of them(experts you say) that accept it. Or those who have disagreed are no more significant?"from an objective rational point of view the theory of evolution predicts much of what we expect to see in nature thus attesting to it's accuracy, we can make predictions using the theory of evolution."It makes sense to an extent as i have said already(continuity~yet another flaw here). And it doesn't make sense at the origins that man was once like a monkey, horses are descendants dinasours. Ignoring what the bible has to say, It is still not sensible because there is no strong backing evidence of that assertion. That is at the beginning, and in the continuity, it makes sense to the extent where it says man in some time will grow ex. An extra finger. Which is absolute nonsense. There is no history of that, both B.C and A.D, upon the many generations that has come to pass by that, man once had three fingers and it became four, then five so we are going six next. It is nonsense. As long as parent have 5 fingers, children too will and unto their children's children and no such change will happen. So if it is true that humans were once monkeys, then it means humans are going to change into what next? A hamburger? Abiognesis or evolution, whatever, it's bullshit." it's the fact that it explains a lot of phenomena and the entire biodiversity of life itself accurately enough we can make predictions off of it"A theory cannot completely not make sense. There have to be some sense somewhere to be acknowledged and that sense evolution makes is just common sense. But when it tries to go into profundity, it gets it all wrong(nonsense)."we all started out as a single cell organism and over time through changes (via mutations) driven by the desire to live and reproduce and the environment in relation to the organisms of that species "About continuity of cells is common sense, but about mutation is bullshit.Afterall, your evolutionist richard dawkins says"Evolution is just a theory" A theory is a theory. Every theory has common sense in it but doesn't necessarily make it reality. It's someone's thoughts. The nonsense in it beats the slight sense in it....making it bullshit."LMFAO I can so relate, the irony is dumbfounding."You are presuming am dumb founded? Why? I don't even like the catholic church in the first place, and any theory that comes out of there is bullshit to me. "if the scientific community is trying to bend science to support the atheistic world view why would we lend credit to that man?"As a 'community', by their principles, that is not their intent. But as individuals in a community with their personal feelings which i can't say for sure whether knowingly or unknowing, get mixed up in their work; unethical.And you say was given credit by the scientific community, is it everyone in the scientific community that accepts it?" if you think it is so easy then go collect your nobel prize. "And then? Am not interested."On a side note, I am very curious as to why you think that is?"Consider the universe as a big book with various characters. The characters can discover and investigate each other yet they cannot comprehend their own contents or existence entirely, due to how sophisticated the intelligence of the book is. characters are overwhelmed by their contents that, they are not even done discovering or fully comprehend. And you want to discover the author? Well, His name is on the book but His body cannot be part of it. Take it or leave it(science choose to leave it...am okay...not their fault).If you intend to reply, type something cute......okay.