azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

No Mentally inept people ( and I mean retarded like Down syndrome retarded) people have mentally inept children.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

There was an actor with Down's syndrome who won a Spanish oscar.http://www.laht.com/article.asp?CategoryId=13003&ArticleId=344501 Also they are about 3x as efficient as normal people to show love and affection while expecting nothing in return. It's also been noticed that they are far better with children and nurturing them than their neuro-typical counterparts.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Then let that help them in the wild with wolves and bears and shit.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

It will actually help them immensely because they render the people around them to protect them impulsively (it's almost he same feeling you feel when a little innocent child is injured). This ability to render sympathy in return for how caring they are, actually motivates the entire neuro-typical team to be angrier, and hence stronger, when fighting.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Oh so by themselves facing a wolf or a bear they would be fine? I don't think so.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Humanity functions by nurturers (most commonly the female gender) of the strong giving them medical, emotional and sexual pleasure in return for the strong, or 'efficient' protection (most commonly the male gender).Individuals with Down's syndrome would assume the nurturing role. The strong would work as a team using the weapons built by themselves, as well as perhaps some nurturers.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

By themselves bro. Not as some shitty group. I am talking about ripping a wolf's jaw off with bare hands. Pulling a bear's heart out from his fucking mouth and throwing that bitch as if I was doing an olympic toss.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

But humanity evolved not to do this because we realised that everyone ends up living much easier lives, leaving us SUPER dominant as we are today, if we worked as a team to produce technology and evolve that, generation after generation, each passing its knowledge down to the next.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I am simply talking about eliminating the weak and leaving the strong to remain. Either in nature or modern life. I you failed in life you failed.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

That is fucking stupid and the only reason humans dominate other species is because we don't use such primitive means of survival as brute strength or merciless natura selection.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Who said we can't apply this to modern life? How is it stupid? Let me see some evidence big boy. Go raise 100,000 humans and monitor them through all their adaptations and tell me what the fuck happens when you gather the data.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

LOL! Same to you.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Oh no you are the one who said it wont work go prove me wrong broski.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

retards breeds retards. Actor is a person who pretends that he is someone else, no thinking involved.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I've seen people with Down syndrome all they can do is sit and drool on them selves. They have nothing to contribute to society why do we keep them around?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

They have so much to emotionally contribute that if we began killing them, we'd might as well kill dyslexics.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Dyslexics at least can function on an intelligent level we get around our problems rather easily thanks to computers spell check is a god send and allows us to get past our problem. In truth dyslexia doesn't really hinder people in life anymore. However people who have serious problems are less lucky and useful one kid at my school for instance is 13 but he has the mind of a 5 year old and stutters so bad he can hardly communicate. I'm not saying he's hopeless but he's almost in middle school (I go to a junior senior high) he's running out of time.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Are you suggesting that a road sweeper is any less important than einstein in the grand scheme of things? Einstein was merely lucky, he cheated the education system due to pure raw talent of almost the highest IQ ever known to mankind.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

If they are able to be a street sweeper obviously I'm not talking about them.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

I will have to use a quote from Fight Club.You are not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

You are what you can do for others and your self. If all you can be is a burden then that's all you are.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

They were stronger. Us humans should evolve and become a dominant force over the entire world.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

We already became the dominant species by NOT using natural selection and instead ensuring wider spread reproduction and lessened infant mortality rate.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Only by technology. What we have when that is gone is weak bodies. I wanna be able to grab a bull by its horns and toss that bitch.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Why toss the bull when you can work as a team to get things done for you? The very ability to debate itself was evolve din our brains through years of conversation, compromise and negotiation of rights of individuals to reproduce no matter what colour or creed.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I want to toss that bitch by myself. I need to evolve in order to do this though. If every human can toss a bull like a fucking beast then we would be a super race.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

We became the super race because we used team work instead of brute strength to succeed. It's this very advantage that separates us, and most other primates, from common animals.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Imagine a god bacteria. It just cannot be destroyed and invades everything. It would have to evolve by shit crazy amounts. Once it reaches that stage though it can replicate and take over the world.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

A god bacteria has no brain and can't enjoy life.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Who cares? It took over the whole fucking world. Like the Neurax Worm in Plague Inc when you activate Transcendence. Just pure sweet take over.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

That is the fucking stupidest argument I have ever heard for the survival of the fittest being taken to as a human philosophy.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Thats because you missed the whole damn point.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

A bacteria kills itself by splitting in half to reproduce. if you want mass suicide to destroy all other living beings on Earth than please go ahead and do it. That's a brilliant fucking plan.Do you know how mitosis even works?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Leaving two behind. Spliting again to make four and more and more until that gene disappears and they take over of course I fucking now how it works I took biology.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

What would that even achieve? You just destroyed the world by suiciding your species over and over. Suddenly there's nothing left to feed on and even your species dies out.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Yep. We took over like a boss. Or I can be a neurax worm so I wouldn't die.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Prodigee has exited this shit-hole. Enjoy rotting in it.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

You say that as if survival of the fittest is not a factor in teamwork.Do you consider bees or piranhas not to be using survival of the fittest. Their fitness, in this case, is their numbers.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

We already are the most dominant species on the planet. We don't need to resort to survival of the fittest. We are in 2013, with medicine, amazing technology, and advancing science. We can help and handle each others problems.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I am talking about humanity as a whole from the start of its origin. Enough genetic enhancement to make us stronger than all other organisms. I want a person to be able to ripped the head off of a wolf with his own hands by himself.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

"I want a person to be able to ripped the head off of a wolf with his own hands by himself." What is wrong with you...........
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

The fuck? How the hell can you judge me. Can you tell me whats wrong with my damn beliefs? Because I highly doubt they are any worse than yours.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Hitler had a similar idea, that was why he killed disabled people as well as the Jews etc.You and I would both be seen as weak with udesirable traits your dyslexic i'm Epileptic in a world of survival of the fittest we would be seen as damaging the gene pool and we both would have been left out in the cold.Are you not planning on reproducing to keep mankind strong?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Dyslexia is actually not bad and its easily managed besides its not genetic my family has no history of dyslexia it was totally by chance that I was born with it. And hitler was a paranoid schizophrenic with a god complex who was given heroine by his doctor. We don't know what when's on in his head.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Anti Darwin.- What surprises me most on making a general survey of the great destinies of man, is that I invariably see the reverse of what today Darwin and his school sees or will persist in seeing: selection in favour of the stronger, the better constituted, and the progress of the species. Precisely the reverse of this stares one in the face: the suppression of the lucky cases, the uselessness of the more highly constituted types, the inevitable mastery of the mediocre, and even of those who are below mediocrity. Unless we are shown some reason why man is an exception among living creatures, I incline to the view that Darwin's school is everywhere at fault. That will to power, in which I perceive the ultimate reason and character of all change, explains why it is that selection is never in favour of the exceptions, and of the lucky cases: the strongest and happiest natures are weak when they are confronted with a majority ruled by gregarious instincts and the fear which possesses the weak. My general view of the world of values shows that in the highest values which now sway the destiny of man, the happy cases among men, the select specimens, do not prevail: but rather the decadent specimens- perhaps there is nothing more interesting in the whole world than this unpleasant spectacle. Why should we care about improving society, I only care about improving myself.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Jesus helped the weak, and Christians are supposed to follow him. .
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Jesus helped the weak but still condemned all of humanity to suffer death and pestilence because he did. Total savior.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Now you are being immature. You are just disputing to act like a jerk. Stop acting like a child. Jesus died on the cross for our sins.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Yes, take you're religion bashing elsewhere. If you have a legit arguent that's OK, but you don't.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Who me? I love Yeshua. :'(
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I meant the other girl disputing you, its under support for you
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Okay, gotcha. Thank ye. :)
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Disputing to be a jerk? Fuck that. Jesus died on the cross to break the curse of sin and death correct? Did it break? I dont think so if we are still born into sin by force. So he practically implants sin in us at birth. You stop acting like a tard.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

We all need to repent, accept Yeshua, and confess Him to others to be saved.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

I would rather praise my iPhone.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

You will eventually bow to Yeshua. He is God. .
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

I am not going to bow to a figment of a mans imagination. That is stupid.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

What she was saying will happen when you're dead and if God exists. By that point if God does exists you will bow, you're venture body, soul, and mind will not let you do otherwise. At this point it is stupid to you, that's why you'll be forced to bow if he exists.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Didnt I already trump your logic? Why are you so persistent in trying to do such futile things?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Nope you have proven nothing. You have proven you are an atheist, that's all. I have countered every single one of your points. None of your statements or questions are new or original.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

You never answered my last statement. Also I am not an atheist. You havent even touched my last point. You simply avoided it.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I merely explained that you're either/or question was based on assumptions and in turn their is not either/or. Sorry about the quip about you being atheist
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

So my statement still stands. You have no answer. By simple logic one would ask such questions. Do you have an explanation or not?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

You still have yet to say where it fails! Saying it fails does nothing.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

If god knew this would happen would he not stop it? If he loves us he would stop it. Why create lucifer knowing what he would do? He is either not omnipotent or not benevolent.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

That would impenge on free will. Knowledge of events does not require absolute action. Neither is he non benevolent by his "non action" (he acted!) because he created a counter to Lucifer, Jesus.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Jesus is not created. He is God. I will debate you on this tomorrow.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I know, I clarified. Jesus is part of the trinity, but their also distinct personalities of God. A critic would claim a bi(tri?)polar God but that's not far from the truth.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Gotcha. :)
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Oh so if I know a rape will happen and I can stop it I dont? What? He acted late if you mean Jesus. And people still act like little shits. He just let Adam sin. Didnt even say No Adam please or something. Just let him fuck up humanity.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Genesis 2:16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”(spiritually)-Dont mess up Adam! Or as you said, no Adam please!Galatians 5:19-21 -no rape says GodNow the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Yes. You just proved my point. Right when that shit was near his mouth he didnt say shit. And for your second verses if nobody read it what difference does it make? Also he still isnt opening a hole in the sky to stop peoplemso my initiL point still stands.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Who said nobody read the second verse. Its as summed that rape is wrong, how can you prove God didn't suggest this?Also, once again God only influences those he has not spoken to directly. As much as he hates the "shit" that happens, he still values the human choice.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Clarification. He allowed Jesus to become human and material to act as a counter to Lucifer.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Yes you will. All shall bow the knee and confess that Yeshua is Lord.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Its funny though. If the Christian God exists the sufferring on this earth is rewarded in the next. Its not as if to say pursue suffering, but we aren't told to suffer without anything to hope for. Anyways you're arguement assumes their is no afterlife. Guess what, you could be wrong :D
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Oh yes. By unleashing hell upon humanity. I am sufe that you are an organism that truly has no soul and simply lives by more scientfic means.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

God didn't unleash hell on earth sweetie, we did. And no, I'm a Christian.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Yes god did. Did he not create the motives to unleash hell? Did he not create evil? Is your god not omnipotent? Why did God kill nearly 20 million people and the devil only killed like 8 or 10?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

No he did not create the motive. He created the possiblity of a choice for evil. He did not create it himself. Each time God took a life (that he created by the way) that person was either given a period of time to change what they were doing (Noahs flood, ninevah, the Amelikites, etc.) or had already explained the "rules" (when an Isrealite was killed). Satan on the other was allowed to take a life just to mess with Job.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

He did create root chance of evil in the fist place therefore being non benevolent as you say. Also he doesnt treat people equally. How come Enoch turned into Metatron and just didnt have to die? Why kill 20 million? He created the sole existence of such a nature with its separate individual strings.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Sigh...since were going to base belief we can deal with the theoretical. Satan was original Lucifer. He was an angel. Then he decided he wanted to be better than God and was cast out of heaven. From their he decieved and bang evil. Allowance of an evil that you tried to prevent does not make you non-benevolent. This also does not make him non-omni-potent because the purpose of life determined where Gods efforts are placed. As to why God chose favorites can be seen here. God did not pick a specific number and bam that's how many he killed. He did it based on their own actions.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

If god is all knowing why even create Lucifer knowing her would fuck up? He already knew right? Or did he not?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Yea he knew. But if everything would "fuck up" (by the way the entire Constitution at least the original written by the old guys was written with the assumption of the fallibility of man) why create it? You assume the point of life is merely existing when since were argueing under the assumption of God, its to worship him. Satan would greater attribute to God being worshiped by choice.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

So he knew that humanity would fuck up. And he just sat there. Either non benevolent or non omnipotent.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Nope, you have to own up to you're own desicions. God wants worship by choice, if you don't want that that's cool. But that doesn't mean he's not all powerful because he has thousands of other humans. Neither does that mean he's not all loving, he sent his son to die by torture and crucifixion so you could have a restored relationship. Its you're choice if you say fu over and over.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

And you avoided the point of my post. He knew humanity was fucked. Yet he didnt stop it. Either he is non benevolent or non omnipotent.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Disagree

Nope, you're missing the entire point of Christianity. God knew we would mess up so he set up a solution. Everyone gets free will and everyone gets what they want. You want to rebellion against God so he allows you to keep on doing so.
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

Sorry to interrupt this..interesting..argument chain, but...What does any of this have to do with the topic of this debate-"survival of the fittest is what humans should live by"?
Debate: Survival of the fittest is what humans should live by.
Side: Agree

I respectfully disagree with that statement. While it is true that we help people they are ultimately responsible for their lives. God helps those who help themselves as they say.