azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

That's a pretty good one. My turn.-Once upon a time, there were three kingdoms, all bordering on the same lake. For centuries, these kingdoms had fought over an island in the middle of that lake. One day, they decided to have it out, once and for all.The first kingdom was quite rich, and sent an army of 25 knights, each with three squires. The night before the battle, the knights jousted and cavorted as their squires polished armor, cooked food, and sharpened weapons. The second kingdom was not so wealthy, and sent only 10 knights, each with 2 squires. The night before the battle, the knights cavorted and sharpened their weapons as the squires polished armor and prepared dinner. The third kingdom was very poor, and only sent one elderly knight with his sole squire. The night before the battle, the knight sharpened his weapon, while the squire, using a looped rope, slung a pot high over the fire to cook while he prepared the knight's armor.The next day, the battle began. All the knights of the first two kingdoms had cavorted a bit too much (one should never cavort while sharpening weapons and jousting) and could not fight. The squire of the third kingdom could not rouse the elderly knight in time for combat. So, in the absence of the knights, the squires fought.The battle raged well into the late hours, but when the dust finally settled, a solitary figure limped from the carnage. The lone squire from the third kingdom dragged himself away, beaten, bloodied, but victorious.And it just goes to prove, the squire of the high pot and noose is equal to the sum of the squires of the other two sides.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

That's a good joke, clean, but I'll have to concede, you win. I'm really serious, time is short, and I enjoy knowing I'm on my way to heaven. Having all the fun and laughs I can is not my purpose...I'm on a fishing trip, trying to get people hooked so the Lord can reel them in and pull them out of the polluted waters of sin and put them in a better place. My trawler is heading for a shore just over the horizon where the tree of life in eternal bloom sheds it's fragrance through the uncloudy day. It's a home where my friends have gone, by faith I can see it afar, where my Father waits over the way, and prepares us a dwelling place there.I've got a mansion over the hilltop, in that bright land where we'll never grow old, and some day yonder, we will never more wander, but walk on streets that are purest gold.I am bound for the promised land, bound for the promised land!Oh, who will come and go with me, I am bound for the promise land.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

I'm gonna have to decline, I'll stick to my terrible jokes. I'm just glad I made at least a part of your life a little brighter!
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Well thank you, and I hope you will read my posts, overlook when I might seem overly harsh with people, notice some lightheartedness and humor in some of my stuff, and above all come to know the love of God for you.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

But I can't overlook all the hate and intolerance in your posts. You call me and my church Satanic, yet we practice more love and tolerance and acceptance than you seem to. We are closer to doing what Jesus commanded than you. We feed his sheep with our community work. We welcome people who seek God but might not believe exactly as we do. We read Jesus words every day. We pray for others who ask for it. We even have a national prayer center. There is nothing Satanic at all going on. I actually saw more cultish and spurious practices and doctrines when I tried other more mainstream fundamental churches before settling on Unity. The vast love and acceptance at Unity is what attracted me. I know how Satan lures and tempts and saw nothing of the sort at Unity. Though I did see it at the Pentecostal church after I was saved. Satan has a large presence there! I challenge you earlier to get specific and name one thing we do at Unity that is Satanic. Yet you thus far have not answered. Instead you continue to speak in arching generalities that are groundless. You also never answered what your church is? Or if you even attend? Do community work like we do? Still I hear nothing from you but empty boilerplate have filled dogma. Giving us true followers of Jesus and his commamds, like is, and other Christians bad names. You have done far more harm here in spreading out word and gently guiding atheists than you have good. Ask anyone. Still I pray for you and other haters.God bless. I will look forward to your response and answer to my questions.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

God hates sin, to love the LORD is to hate evil, your way is evil, you are being evil, God loves you and I'm telling you that you are being evil because telling you less than the truth would be apathetic. UNITY is occult and witchcraft, seeking communion with the dead and serving evil spirts who deceive you into thinking you have power to be free of punishment in death. You're evil, your church is evil, and you are on your way to eternal damnation in Hell with no Savior as you have rejected Him as He is, the Living God, the Lord Jesus Christ.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

If I say something funny and I'm not specifically pointing out sin, talking of Hell, or talking of Jesus and the gospel of His resurrection and atoning work for us on the cross, it's only intended to get people to read other posts of mine so they will hear the gospel of God that they can be saved from Hell and have everlasting life now and forever.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

I don't find it weird when people invent a fake persona, imitating me, this is not the first one on this site, it happens.......they know they can't beat me, so they try to join me by imitating me with a parody account......when I ignore them, they get tired of themselves and fade away. This guy will fade away soon, he'll get tired of his fake show.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Or they think you're awesome and just want to be your friend.Do you have some sort of competition complex?
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

pervert.....................................................................................
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

Only in privacy. Now that's not Really perversion is it.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

Whether it's bad for you, or not, I don't know, but it is definitely bad for the animal being eaten.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Some meat is ok and won't cause issues in the human body. The problem is the quantities the average westerner eats is far beyond what we historically consumed.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Lets look at this from a scientific perspectivelook at lion,it eats only meat. Now look at its teeth. its sharp and pointy for tearing up meat.Now look at a cow. It eats only veg. It has only flat teethi think you all know where im going with thisHumans have sharp AND flat teeth. We were MEANT to eat meet its in our nature
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

:facepalm:http://www.boneclones.com/images/bc-025-lg.jpg Those teeth look pretty pointy to me, must be a carnivore, right? Wrong, it's a panda.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

Gorillas too, they have some fierce looking teeth but are vegetarians.It is the digestive tract you need to look at not the teeth.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Pandas are omnivores, like humans.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

They are primarily herbivorous.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Probably why they only have four of those teeth instead of a mouthful.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Um, OK?
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Vegetarians are haelthy. Again i will give you that. but you must understand that we need ENERGY. the amount of callories we get from veg is too little to satisfy our needs. Only non veg can provide us with the necessary protein required for our daily activities. VEg can prevent diseases but it cant make you stronger
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

Since the amount of calories taken in can be increased by eating larger or more frequent meals. this isn't much an issue.What's really at stake (particularly in reference to your statement "it can't make you stronger") is the protein. Meat is highly efficient because it gives us all the proteins we need right there. But vegetables all have proteins too, just not the same ones. Being aware of the nutritional value of meals and being sure to use a variety of veggies to help maximize your protein intake is totally viable, and brings on some other health benefits along the way.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

Vegetarians eat more than just vegetables. I don't know why you would think that, but it's wrong. We eat everything but meat. Also, meat is not the only way to get protein. Beans and nuts are great ways to get protein. And we can also get the calories we need by just eating more. Meat is not by any means something that humans need to be healthy.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

I'm a non-vegetarianchicken and meat is more delicious than vegetables
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

MEAT IS LOVE, I LOVE MEAT, SO SHOULD YOU! we need it a lot! Meat is what has made us into the humans we are today. Without meat we would never have evolved into these magnificent creatures of nature! <3 XOXO #MEAT #YOLOSWAG
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

I am not exactly an expert on health issues like these, neither do I possess lots of knowledge on this particular matter, but I've got to say non-vegetarians have a way more balanced diet and they eat healthier. First-off, humans require nutrients which meat contain, and those found in vegetables are not sufficient to satisfy that. I feel that vegetarians are generally weaker in terms of health. However, non-vegetarians also have to take note of how much meat they consume, in order to prevent excess weight gain, and include vegetables in their daily diet as well. Vegetables have been proven to prevent certain diseases in the human body such as cancer and might have medical purposes/ might help to strengthen our immunity system. To support my point, I have to state that it is a win-win solution if humans consume just an ample amount of both vegetables and meat so as to balance the ecosystem of all living organisms.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Why non vegetarians. Because it's a more valuable source of nutrients.Vegetarians can aqcuire protein by eating legumes and nuts, these protein are incomplete. Complete protein consisits of all the valuable amino acids that your body needs, and animal protien consists of all those valuable protiens.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

here are innumerable health benefits of eating meat, to say, for example, it serves as a fabulfous source of high quality proteins, which a single vegetarian food is not able to provide. It contains all the essential amino acids that the body requires. The red meat contains very high quantities of iron, when compared with plant origin foods. 100 grams of Liver contains 6000 mcgm of iron as against 325 mcgm in 100-gram carrots. Read further to explore information about the advafgfntages of eating meat…The phosphorus content present in meat gets much more easily absorbed than that present in cereals and legumes. This is owing to the fact that cereals and legumes contain phosphorus, usually in the form of phytic acid that must be hydrolyzed before absorption. Meat also serves as the main source for the intake of vitamin B12. Read more at http://www.iloveindia.com/nutrition/recipes/non-veg-dishes/goodness-of-meat.html#D9TpOXyH6MbA0D4Y.99
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

"Actual human beings," as you called them, eat better than vegetarians, because they eat what they evolved to eat.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Whos side are you on?i want to support you but i dont get what your trying to say
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Not sure how I ended up on the vegetarian side. Where did the edit link go?
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

Oh, I guess you can only edit posts within a certain time frame.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

Actual nutrition has little to nothing to do with being a carnivore, omnivore, or vegetarian but with getting the optimal nutrition. In general, I would presume that vegetarians are somewhat more likely to do so for the simple fact that their dietary decisions have greater intention to them from the beginning. This is not innately true however; there are unhealthy vegetarians just as there are healthy non-vegetarians.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

Vegetarian are very good as compare to non-vegetarian . Vegetarian eat vegetable or plants but non vegetarians eat meat of animals . Through vegetarian no one has any problem but Through non vegetarians animal and vegetarian both have problem. While the meat is near somewhere to the vegetarian, it smells bad to them and they are not able to do any thing properly and animals they lose their lives for non vegetarians , which is not good according to me.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

I don't know about the diets on their own however in regard to your debate, which seems to be more concerned with the people themselves, I would have to say vegetarians.While there are health nuts in both areas, the majority of vegetarians in comparison to the majority of people who include meat in their diet are more health conscious.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

In my opinion, vegetarians are healthier. Vegetarians eat all those good veggies and will live a good, long life.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

We eat way healthier. Red meat (hot dogs, steak etc.) is awful for you and can give you cancer. Cancer sucks. Meat is also very fatty. Vegetarians eat a lot of veggies, fruit, beans and nuts-all things that have a lot of healthy things.
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Non-vegetarian

If you think we are at risk of cancer then let me tell you, you are at risk of a heck of a lot of nutrient deficiencies
Debate: Vegetarians vs Non vegetarians
Side: Vegetarian

No, I could be, but I'm not. I just have to balance out everything. Meat does not supply everything a human needs to live. I can get protein from nuts and beans. Sure, I have to eat a lot of them but it's better than eating murdered animals. All of that vegetarian fake meat stuff is very high in everything that you would be missing on from meat, nutrient wise.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

The bond between mother and child is precious. ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

It's not unnatural. It's only taboo because society makes it that way. In reality, it's just another body part. There is no reason to shame it.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Mackindale!!!! A voice of reason. How refreshing is that?! Of course, women have served as men's whipping posts for far too long (yes, yes, exceptions exist!). Surviving their abject ignorance is a testament to a woman's strength. No man could survive the treatment they dish out to the distaff side.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

As a society, we need to decide if we want burka clad, modest, women or the bear breasted women of some indigenous tribes. Or somewhere in between. Although, once we say "somewhere in between" we have to specify further. For example, in our society it's OK for women to show every side of her boobs except the nipple. When breastfeeding, you don't normally see the nipple so I don't understand what the big deal is. Unless what society means by "somewhere in between" is that you can show all sides of a boob (except the nipple) if it's a sexy setting but no part of it otherwise.Society is full of double standards. I just play along ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

Says the woman who would serve the biggest law suit possible if she saw a dick near her soup. It's easy to love your own parts. It should be legal. Just have some humility about it.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Is it normal to eat in public?Because that's what the baby is doing, and it is illegal to not feed a baby.So technically, your breaking the law by not feeding your baby if you're in public.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

I don't eat my lunch on the bus because its rude. Just try and live by the same standard.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Your not a baby now are you !?!?!?!?! we are talking about kids who cant feed themselves
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Yeah, why the hell not. What's so bad about breastfeeding?
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Did you see the video? ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

So is peeing and you don't see me doing that in public ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Why, jc, I haven't seen you do anything, albeit I'm sure you're good at something--most of all, peeing..........on the most nurturing tasks of life.............the natural feeding of an infant.Women simply have to do a better job at helping boys develop minds of higher intellect and spirituality. They just seem to become so fixated on members at hip but not hip level. joecavalry, indeed!!
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

I nurtured my kids. Heck..., I even taught them to do a 3-point landing in slowmo ;)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtiV42NrLAE&list=UU3toa0LqoY0aiFwwdajAl7g&index=9&feature=plcp I even taught them how to hang on for dear life on the swing of death ;)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwAjE7U51ck&list=UU3toa0LqoY0aiFwwdajAl7g&index=8&feature=plcp
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

Breast feeding isn't exactly what I want to be seeing when going out. I don't want to see little kids sucking on tits, which is why they should use toilets or a private area.Maybe there should be some areas delegated for breast feeding as apposed to toilets and in my vision
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

How utterly sad that you would miss such a sighting as an opportunity to teach your kids the nature of nurturing. If alone, then learn to simply focus on other things--your oogling would just serve to upset the mom.The ONLY reason I would ever avoid breastfeeding in public would be to protect myself from people with sick minds, as I would venture to guess yours is.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

I don't have a sick mind..., you can breastfeed in front of me ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

I guess it depends on who's doing the breastfeeding. Like..., if it's Dolly Parton and she's like got 3 or 4 tykes latched on...., I may pay to see that ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

Perversion is a bent of yours? Or simply childish? In either case, rhetorical, of course!! Okay, so your attitude is crass, but worse, so predictable, tiresome, and destructive.The mind is expandable, so get thee to a book.........or two, even (PI).
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

You're probably a good person but you haven't taken the time to fill out your profile, so I'll never know! ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

You're right, I am a good person..........well, perhaps not always good...........okay, if you bloody well insist, definitely not always...........but I always give it my best shot. I don't "do" profiles preferring instead to let my remarks stand on their own...........and even, then, you'll never know.But the nature of YOUR response suggests to me that you have a great sense of humour............and rarely if ever could that be considered a negative.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

That's my "Special" smiley --> ;D
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

Mam. May I tell you how much you stink. Is everything you say come off with this much phony empowerment. You said he had a dirty mind because he disagreed with you. You brought him to that level and the. Tell him to read because you had perverse thoughts on his behalf?
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

I was not sure where I stood on this one my first thought was nah I dont want to see that but then I thought is it really that big a deal it's only Boob's but I like your idea of having a separate feeding area a bit like changing area etc but obviously not in the toilets
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

But peeing alongside another man is something you don't mind witnessing and engaging in? But a child suckling at the breast evokes feelings of negativity? Yikes, what manner of homo sapien are you?Haven't quite decided whether you're nuts or simple minded or is there another choice in there I may have missed? In any event, I find your manner boorish and so unenlightened. How do people grow up to be like that? Alas, insufficient nurturing. I rest my case.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: Perfectly normal

I just argue both sides to get ball rolling ;)BTW, I was referring to women. Women do not want to see men taking a leak, no matter how natural. It's a double standard I've learned to live with ;)
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

Was this aimed at me? If so I am not simple minded, maybe a little nuts but I am assuming it was'nt as my manner was neither boorish or unenlightened and I never mentioned my views on peeing. I suggested a private feeding area as there are probably a lot of women out there who might not want to breast feed their kids in public with everyone watching the same as there are a lot of people (men and women) who dont want to watch and there's probably some people who may want to watch just to get their kicks, which would make the mother feel uncomfortable. Maybe this is societies fault as we do seem to live in a world where seeing nakedness is wrong and thought of as something that will corrupt minds more than violent images
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

That's a new person dumby. Or do you attack everyone like that. "You disagree so you're crazy or sick!" Try developing a reason for your point of view instead of vague mental disorders for everyone. We pee in a designated area away from the public. At least I do. That's why I'd never go eat lunch in the bathroom.
Debate: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
Side: wait..., what? No!!!

I think breast feeding is alright just can't there be a better place than in public? It can be very distracting to other people and families. I understand that sometimes the baby needs food now and maybe some mothers are just completely against using a bottle under any circumstance. in that case I would think you could find some private place to do that at least.