azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

Oh, you should care about history. It offers key predictions into what could happen. To be able to predict the future, who must understand what has happened in the past.The only purpose of a government is what I already statedSo you believe in a communist government?How much food someone needs depends on the person and how they are built. In this the government has literally no sayPlease please please tell that to Michelle Obama and her lunch programs! I'm hungry! There should be no moneyYou're just inviting anarchy here. Money has been around since Mesopotamia or earlier. Why need a gun if you can snap the offenders neck?The offender won't offer you the same courtesy by not being armed.Then the government is the offender by removing your ability to defend yourselfCan you please tell that to Obama? Pleeeaase? He doesn't seem to understand that. We are fighting the government on this and some states are taking the matter into their own hands by saying they won't obey the new laws and enforcing their right and the right of their citizens.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

Oh, civilization has changed greatly. Leaps and bounds. I'm just saying that history can be useful. An example I like to use is Russia, specifically the Russian winter. First recorded attempt in winter to invade Russia, the Teutonic Knights. They invaded Novgorod and went to battle on a lake. Their cavalry was so heavy that they broke through the ice. When they started to retreat, the winter got so bad that their army was almost annihilated. Example 2:Napoleon. Invaded Russia, then retreated after one of the harshest winters on record. Example 3:Hitler. Invaded while not being prepared for winter because he underestimated the Russians, who used the winter to their advantage. History repeated itself 3 times. Napoleon and a hitler could have learned by looking into history. Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.Because I literally do not care about any preconceived views.I don't really know how that can work in a modern world, but okay. I'm not from US.Eh, it was worth a shot.You simply cannot imagine bigger and larger.Oh, I can. It is just that I think in the modern day because thats what affects me. A moneyless society? Good luck trying to introduce that to the world. I think it would be great if we didn't have to rely on cash, but you can't apply it today, nor in the far future. Money is too engrained in the world culture that you can't get rid of it. group up and teach Obama sufficientlyThat's why I didn't vote for him. And we can't just take up arms against him. Right now we have no reason to. Later, maybe so. But even if we did take up arms, it would be a bloodbath. We would need to use politics first before resorting to war. I can see the abuses. I see it everyday! And I'm fighting it! Think objectively? We all do in some way. It isn't just a select group. You are a dreamer. Wishing for better things and to fix society. It's impossible. No one can fix society. You have to think now. Your going way to deep and things change before you have an answer. You need to think "What can I do now to fix something?". Your predicting a society without money, violence, hypocrisy. Your values may be just and right, but trying to introduce it to society now is futile.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

I don't think it should. Now I hate smoking and anything about it, but it's the people's own decision what they want to do with their body.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: yes

Then what about smoking's effect on other people? Second hand smokers are those who receive smoke indirectly because of the first hand smokers. Usually, they are the ones who are greatly affected by the smoking. If you're saying that it's the persons' choice if they would smoke or not.. Then what about the others who are not smoking but receive smoke because of other smokers? It is their choice not to smoke, but then they still receive smoke? What shall they do about it?
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

That is a major problem, yes, but many smokers are aware of what they do and avoid giving it to other people. Also education is a way to prevent this. We already have great anti-smoking campaigns showing the dangers of smoking and second-hand smoking.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: yes

Not when it affects other people. People do not have the right to create an unhealthy environment for other people.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

It is a problem, but many smokers are aware of second hand smoke, so they take care to avoid others while smoking.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

Some people get into a lot of stress. In such cases, cigarettes act as a stress buster, and helps them to calm down. We may have a lot of problems on our hands, if people are not allowed to calm themselves down in this, well, upright wrong way. Yes, smoking is wrong, but it largely depends on the people who indulge in it. Some may think it's correct,although they know that it harms their body system.In countries like India, where poverty is at large, sometimes smoking becomes a necessity for the poor because they cannot afford to buy the food.All said and done, smoking is bad, but it is sometimes also a useful tool (although largely harmful ).
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: yes

Some people get into a lot of stress. In such cases, cigarettes act as a stress buster, and helps them to calm down.Oh really?I have had a lot of stress, you have no fuckin' idea how much. Did I smoke? Fuck no! I'm not an idiot. If I have stress I look for its cause, and guess what, once you find it (or those) you can deal with it healthily, without damaging your body and mind in the process. You'll actually learn something, like how to deal with stress.If pissed off by something, or just in a bad mood, clearing your mind from all thoughts and keeping it that way for a short time will calm your mind. In countries like India, where poverty is at large, sometimes smoking becomes a necessity for the poor because they cannot afford to buy the food.Seriously? They cannot afford to buy food but always have money for cigarettes? How about not buying cigarettes and instead buying food with that money?All said and done, smoking is bad, but it is sometimes also a useful tool (although largely harmful ).Since there are much healthier and much more positive ways to deal with problems, ways from which you can actually learn about yourself, smoking is never a useful tool.All smoking does is cloud the problem for a very short time and then it'll be back, am I not right? Then again smoking to cloud it, then again and again and... How about actually dealing with the problem?!?!?
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

Everybody deals with their problems their own way. Some people deal with the problem, some forget about it and others just put it aside used smokes, weed, alcohol whatever.If you don't smoke, good for you. But every person is different, and enjoys different things. If someone wants to smoke, ok go smoke. Why should I or anyone else care about what other people do?
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: yes

Everybody deals with their problems their own way.And that is supposed to justify their problem dealing that pollutes the air I breathe? By causing me a problem? Really?Anyway, smoking is not dealing with the problem, it is simply covering it for a very short time. If they actually dealt with it, if they actually looked within themselves for the cause of the problem they would find it. They would learn about themselves and so would find a lifetime's supply of means to deal with their problems, without damaging their own bodies and mind.Some people deal with the problem, some forget about it and others just put it aside used smokes, weed, alcohol whatever.Some deal with them, like I have, and always will.Forgetting about it does not make things better, the problem won't go away, if there is a problem it must be dealt with, otherwise it will mess up one's life. And smoking, or any drugs, is not dealing with it.You cannot put it aside with smokes, drugs, alcohol, or anything like that. All those things do is cover it for a very short time, and then it will return.But every person is different, and enjoys different things.Really fucked up if a person enjoys damaging oneself.If someone wants to smoke, ok go smoke.That is actually fine by me. Just do it somewhere private, somewhere where I can not smell the stench, nor see it. I want to breathe smoke free air. And it is a fact that literally no one needs cigarettes.Why should I or anyone else care about what other people do?Because the world does not revolve around you. Because we do not live by your rules. You do not live here alone, you live with very many people, and because of that you have to consider them and what is good for them. Smoking is never good for anyone, just so you wouldn't get it wrong.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

Nummi,Not all people are intelligent, patient and wise enough to sit and calm their minds before deciding what to do. Therefore, although you avoided it, some people cannot.Food is relished, but they can buy only a little which does not satisfy their hunger. Cigarettes come in cheaper. Also, I never said they have only cigarettes. They have both in combination, thus JUST making ends meet.Not all people have that much mental power to do so.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

America is the land of opportunity and freedom, so no smoking should not be illegal. If it came down to the legalization of any smokable substance you would have a very big problem. First of all it would negatively impact our economy because tobacco is a huge part of it. It would also cause all kinds of outrage in the large smoking community. There's a reason you can find cigarettes almost anywhere you go. Also if you make it illegal it would be the equivalent to a Prohibition movement which oppressed the free people of the United States. If someone chooses to smoke, its their choice not yours. So mind your own business and let everyone else live their life as they choose.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

If it was illegal it would just give criminals something else to profit from on the black market and smoking has been so restricted already a non smoker can easily avoid smoking areas. I don't see it being made illegal because the government make too much from it via taxation
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

I think that smoking should stay legal. I understand that it slowly kills everybody, and more and more people start smoking every day, but it's people's choice. We only have one life, and its our decision what to do with it. If someone doesn't like to be around smokers, well don't be around them. It ain't that hard..
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

If banning alcohol caused an Al Capone to run around. What do you think banning smoking will do?
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

Keep it legal, but keep it away from non-smokers and tax the hell out of it.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

No anyone who thinks that should be thrown in jail and/or used as an ass floss to fat chicks.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

It is a very different matter when you smoke as opposed to your friend or your family member smoking. If you yourself are smoking, it is 99.99% possible that you are already addicted. This is not good. Not only does smoking damage you, but it also inserts addiction into your system which is the main problem. You need to try and cut smoking times, and then cut down on it for good. Yes, this is not a difficult thing to do. But let me say another thing: if your friend is smoking, chances are is that he is addicted. You yourself are not a smoker in this case, and feel bad just watching him ruining his own life right in front of you. Do not call the cops if you wish to help or ease him. It will not do neither of these things. Instead, ask him to see if he could give the cigarettes to you and that you are going to dispose of them. If he does not oblige, tell him it is okay and that it will be fine if he just does it less times than he actually does. Secretly, though, you are formulating a plan for him to see a doctor. You are a good friend and you are going to call up the local family hospital to make a request for your unlucky friend. See, not only would the doctor actually understand how to solve this problem in a more effective way, but your friend will now never have to deal with smoking ever again because of meeting up with a talented helper. The FBI or the CIA will not understand how to do this. Even if they are going to bring up a doctor or whatever, they will ask you for payment or will ask you to fill out a long and tedious agreement. Just head over to the hospital yourself and send a request. Chances are, your friend will encounter better care than if he were with the indecisive CIA or FBI or whatever.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

We'll we live in a country where we are able to drink, smoke and drive big heavy trucks and cars, this alone accounts for many deaths. I have to say no one is forced to drink, smoke or drive so therefore it will remain legal.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

I don't think smoking will be made illegal because States make too much revenue from the sales of cigarettes.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

I am against smoking, But I don't think it should be illegal. If people want to smoke, let them. Plus it gives people jobs, the last thing we need to do is get rid of more jobs.
Debate: Should smoking be illegal
Side: no

I smoke cigarettes because the act of smoking the cigarette, the inhalation of the bluish smoke and the slow exhalation feels calming. I centers me and it prepares my mind for creative tasks. I've never been so stressed that i required a cigarette and I've been days without a single craving at a time. I do not smoke around nonsmokers, I never smoke inside and I know and accept that it is shortening my lifespan. I, however, decided that my creative freedom was more important to me than a prolonged existence.That's a personal choice I made for myself.Should i be deprived of the catalyst to my creativity?I don't believe anyone should.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

No I personally believe that meat can cure diseases. If you had a disease that required you to feel around you have to? Remember to ban your sources :) that's just my opinion though and I'm not a pediatrician. I have however seen a doctor in real life and he changed me as a human being.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

You may want to view this debateHere are some references from it:https://authoritynutrition.com/randomized-controlled-trials-in-nutrition/http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-8b.shtmlhttp://docencia.med.uchile.cl/evolucion/2002sciamdieta.pdfhttp://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/labor/ aging/rsi/rsi papers/2004finch.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6981/full/nature02358.html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53561/ http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/69/1/147.abstract?ijkey=22242145b0c104929702b9a6f54caaea52e356a5&keytype2=tf ipsecshahttp://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/155/7/636.abstract?ijkey=c8ae5aa2300e9c34c5008f6a287e9716bc2c1c0c&keytype2=tf ipsecshahttp://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/44/6/863.full.pdf http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/82/5/1107.abstract?ijkey=4b0b564257ad4d25baf46f0b708ee216e86d7e97&keytype2=tf ipsecshahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11842948?dopt=Abstract http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/75/4/773.abstract?ijkey=82e4386d15788f065a5804b8937478309f7fdec5&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

Yes, eating meat is bad for you, especially steak, chicken, turkey, and fish......also ham, all very very bad to you. You can give it all to me and I'll eat it.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Why would eating meat be bad for you? It is a good way to get nutrients including iron. There are some meat you should eat with moderation such as red meats.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

Small amounts can give you nutrients, but a lot can be a problem.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

A lot of anything can be a problem. Water is needed for all known life, but you can have too much of it.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Of course it's not bad for you. With two qualifiers to that....In moderation. The meat is lean.Other ways, it's a good source of protein and iron and the B vitamins group. My wife unfortunately for me is a vegetarian so I probably don't get to eat as much meat as I like. She does make some tasty veggie dishes though. But still I have to sneak the occasional cheeseburger once awhile.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Animals eat meat. We are animals, right? It's a natural instinct. Natural instincts aren't bad.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

I would say eating meat is bad for you if you don't balance it. For example, if you eat meat everyday it causes heart disease and high cholesterol that can lead to high blood pressure. In addition, people should eat meat twice a week and eat more vegetable more often.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

Actually eating lean meat even on a daily basis does not raise cholesterol levels. (I am assuming you are referring to the LDL or "bad" cholsterol.) Good lean meat CAN raise our HDL levels, however, which is the high-density "good" cholsterol.The whole meat and butter and eggs things was given an unduly harsh rap back in the late 90s. As being the evil component of our diets that was causing our obesity and heart problems and high LDL cholesterol levels.This has all been roundly debunked in nutrition and Biology circles over the past several years. We now know TWO very important facts:1--Cholesterol itsdelf is not the enemy. IN fact it is necessary and is a natural substance secreted from our own bodies internal organs. It is in the 'sterol" group of chemical compounds. Fat even is necessary for optimal brain cell performance. 2--the REAL enemy is processed foods. Also it is HFCS. The body cannot break this down as it does the natural sugars we evolved with, such as with pure cane sugar and lactose and fructose and even sucrose. This is why the "paleo" diet has been proven to be so effective. The much better and accurate and useful adage--other than don't eat too much meat--would be: "If your grandparents didn't have it, don't eat it, except in small and infrequent portions."So....Real Enemies = HFCS; lack of exercise; refined and processed foods.False enemies = good lean meat; natural butter; eggs; veggies, and fruit in moderation. (fruit is actually loaded with sugar, albeit natural fructose. Still, too much of it can cause bloating and weight gain and it is best eaten earlier in the day and not at night.hope this helpsSShttp://chriskresser.com/the-diet-heart-myth-cholesterol-and-saturated-fat-are-not-the-enemy/
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

http://www.caloriesecrets.net/is-eating-meat-everyday-bad-for-you/
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Eating meat is not bad for you. But it basically is judged on how much we eat meat. hello,, we only need to be 20% carnivorous. In USA, meat is like a daily food and it's so scary because it does have bad effects on people and a a bad contributor to global warming. Watch Cowspiracy.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

We are an omnivorous species. We've been eating meat for a long time and our teeth have adapted to accomodate that (as well as to keep eating plants). There are some pitfalls to eating only meat or eating certain types of meat but let's not gloss over the fact that is also true with foods from the plant world.Be omnivorous. Get a balance. You'll be fine.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Meat is good, there is a reason why we have been eating it for CENTURIES!!!!It is beneficial to our health, as all the people below have already covered (thank you)!!!It gives you the write nutrients and provides for a balanced diet.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

there is no nutrient in meat that you can't geat from a meatless lifestyle.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Eating meat is not bad for you. You can get different vitamins and minerals from meat such as Vitamin B12, Creatine and Vitamin D3. We can also get proteins and iron from meat. Personally, I think that as long as we take the right amouont of meat, we will healthy.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

No- A large number of people associated with the Beef industry will be unemployed. These people might involve in illegal trade.- Beef is a cheaper source of protein compared to other forms and banning it will deprive the poor section of it.- The ban is only on the beef from the Indian buffaloes that burden the farmers breeding them. It had been an alternate source of income for them.- There will be losses in the Export business as a large part of beef export will be impacted by the ban.- Various industries such as Pharma will be affected as many of their products involve ingredients like fats from buffaloes.- State does not have a right to impose a certain food culture in any form on people. If it does, it becomes a theocratic state.- It will hamper the cattle economy. There will be no one who will nurture buffalo, cows or bulls, which are neither useful for meat nor agricultural purposes.- Nothing is done about imported beef. There are many restaurants that use Angus beef from USA and Australia.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

Wow I swear every time I come back, something even weirder is going on. Somebody has a new troll and/or legitimate christian spam account that is a literal amalgamation of the two biggest christian accounts, and one of which, Saintnow, you, is making a genuinely funny comment without any mention of sinners or liars or evil. Bob Dylan was right...
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

Wow, every time I read your posts I think you must be retarded.........well, I'll give you a break on that IF you honestly recognized that I can be very funny...and I often purposely say things in a way that anybody with a good sense of humor will laugh........and I'm laughing as I type far more than most people would guess. How else could I deal with all that hate people throw at me when I say we are all sinners, none good, all deserve to die, all deserve to burn in Hell and all can be saved by the Savior but most will be lost in Hell forever by their own choice?
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is not bad for you

I think there's only one way to settle this.........-Comedy battle.You and me, share a debate and go head to head, competing to have the funniest jokes, in-jokes, or jabs at one another.
Debate: Is eating meat bad for you?
Side: Eating meat is bad for you

I"m all about Jesus Christ, and the fact that He is God who loves us so much that He died for us to save us from Hell. I use humor only as a tool to get people to hear about Jesus.