azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

he has amazing talent and if he couldn't Really sing, he wouldn't have a record deal. I hope Justin goes very far in his career and does not listen to the people who are jealous of his talent
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

For one guys are not jealous of a teenage boy who has not even hit puberty yet and what you call amazing talent is called not his, usher is like his mentor and justin beibers only talent is being able sing like a girl. And so far he is not getting to far in his career. For example... If you look on facebook when justin beiber first came out there were only about a couple hundred people who hated him, Now if u ask mostly anyone who is not in highschool they will say justin beiber is gay. Only true fans he has left are elemantry school kids.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: no such thing as a good hip hop artist

You do not need to be a good singer to get a record deal and vice versa. You agruement provides no proof, is illogical, and ultimately invalid.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

HA! who would be jealous of bieber? Who on earth would want to sing like a hamster on helium!!!
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

R U all mad.He is a top singer.Check his best songhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kffacxfA7G4 His historyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Bieber He is doing so well at 15yrs.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

His rhymes are horrible, his dancing is mentally retarded. I saw 'Baby' ft luda, which is why I made this debate. And Justin starts doing like the wave with his arms, and then proceeded to do the worst robot/twitch I have ever seen in my life.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

He is not a dancer but a singer.He has billions of fans especially girls.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

He has billions of fans especially girls.LOL, how many people do you think are in the world? Trillions? =P
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: no such thing as a good hip hop artist

You can't expect people on these types of sites to know anything.Let's say that 'billions of fans' equals three billion.Assuming that one half of the 'girl' population are obsessed with him that would mean that there are 6 billion 'girls'.Now, assuming that 'girls' equal 20% of the population, that would total 30 billions of people living on this planet.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

Damn are society is going to hell... ;)
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

Is going???Has gone is more like it.(Notice that yudish got two upvotes for that!)
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

Our society, LOL at are ;)
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

haha. i couldnt hit the up button anymore, but i give u 1,000,000,000 points
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

Justin Bieber is the best hip hop star of all time. I look good, I sing great, and my dance moves could be better but hey I'm only 15. So give me a break guys.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

1) Why are you talking in 3rd person?2) i dont think anyone could be so stupid to think you were justin bieber3) justin bieber duznt have the time to spend on a little website like this.4) if you are justin bieber (ha! yeah rite), then get a life. ur only fans are little girls. ur not hot, not talented, and you sound AWFUL. You have more haters than fans. People dont like you. Look at the pie chart on this debate. Look at how many people hate you compared to how many like you! You cant dance. you twitch. You dance like my dog when she sees a ham. Why should we give jb/you a break? ur nothing special. this world thinks that people who are famous are some sort of god. my (hawt) friend can sing amazingly, and he looks wayyy cuter than jb! So why isnt he famous?: Because some lucky poser (jb) happens to know Usher (his friend's mom's cousin's friends brother's twice removed aunt's friend). You dont deserve to be on tv. The first time my dad saw you on youtube, he said "what a squeaky punk!". When he first saw Greyson Chance (I. LOVE. GREYSON) he said "what a cute kid... and what a voice!". GREYSON CHANCE IS SO MUCH BETTER! UR GONNA GET PWNED, BIEBER!!!! >:D
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

My God, lay off him already. He is just a kid living his dream. So stop whining about his voice or whatever. I would bet that most of you out there would never be able to sing as well as him. He's famous, he has huge hits, loads of people love him and best of all, his haters can't do anything about it. So just GROW UP.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

candygal its time for you to wake and smell the fresh air because justin beibers talent smells like shit. Almost every kid in the world can sing better than that fag. He is becoming less famous every single day. He had huge hits when he first came out, but now mostly just little elemantry kids listen to his music. And candygal you are dumb, because his so called haters can boo his ass off the stage they can do what ever they want, so dont sit here and tell us to grow up when it is u who really needs to grow up and stop listening to dumbass justin beiber.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

Well actually his haters can throw water bottles at him. And after there was that incident where he supposedly kissed a girl, quite a few of his fans were ready to tear him (and the girl) limb from limb.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

haha! the fan girls are hilarious! so stupid and willing to do anything for that person no matter what happens. they have no lives
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

This site sucks just because it considers the 'winner' to be the most quantitative, not qualitative. Just because a lot of people like hating on him, doesn't diminish the fact that he has musical talent. Maybe his message is the best, but he does have talent. Which puts him ahead of a lot of other hip hop artists. He's a prodigy. Give him time to develop his talents and mature his message. He just needs a little be of refinement. Most of his 'haters' are just simply that, 'haters'. Cut him some slack. A lot of you are really judgemental too. All of your arguements about his talents aren't directed at that. They're directed at his physical appearance. And a false assumption that he's gay. He's not, trust me.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

it doesnt have a winner. it just tells you the majority of people who do not like him. he has no talent. haha... once he matures in his talent, his voice is gonna be awful! Puberty changes you. Why should we cut him some slack? gimmee 1 good reason. You sound like an idiot
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

he's awesome!!  just because he's new all the old people hate him~ no offense
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

I'm 17 and I hate him, I'm in high school currently and the only 'girls' that like him are the freshman. And they never know whats going on.
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

I'm 12 and I hate him with envy. He puts shame to the good city of Atlanta, my city no less! Then again, I hate all (c)rappers and pop stars, because I'm arrogant and stubborn ;-)
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Without a doubt

Houston... good to know. no offense, but i really dont think anyone cares how you act...
Debate: Is Justin Bieber the worst hip hop star of all time?
Side: Nah he tight dawg -.-

krog what are you seven years old or something? seriously hes not new he is old news. get over it
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Sure... that's what I tell all my victims, nothing personal, it's just part of my nature.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

It as always been apart of are nature to kill. People kill other people it been happening ever since we were born on this earth.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

-Flips history book open...- it does seem to look this way o.O...
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Yes, i think it is, because animals kill each other and other animals for food, and we did evolve from animals. But i still think it is wrong and you shouldn't kill people or animals as much as possible.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

If we aren't supposed to kill, how are we supposed to get protein? I dislike the idea of waiting for an old and sick cow to drop dead so I can eat that nutritious skin and muscle.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

It is. We kill ants, sheep, goats, pigs, cows, snakes, lizards, tigers, other wild and domesticated animals. And then we also 'kill' plants and forests to make way, build housing areas, new cities and "zoos". We kill everything except each other. Oh no, wait... We also kill babies when they are still in the womb; kill babies based on their gender and sacrifice them to Gods. We kill each other in wars or genocides or gender crimes. Not only is killing part of us but so is hypocrisy!
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Seeing as most humans eat meat and meat is often attained through killing, i would say in the food respect it is completely apart of our nature. However if you mean the killing of another human i would say that we are shaped individually and that there are many events and situations that can push people to murder and kill and these are on a basic level instinctual desires to relieve stress/loss/pain, but what separates us from other animals is our intellect and through use of it we control these instincts and desires and impulses. I think perhaps though if there were no consequences to killing another human then i believe a lot more people would kill whether it be curiosity, revenge or simple blood-lust but the fact that we have laws against it shows that our caring and loving, or if at least mutual respect, nature is greater than our desire to kill, but again this is quite specific to individuals and what has happened to them in their life and lies more on nurture than nature. Since this is killing in general though i will say that to survive and to protect and to feed ourselves killing is undoubtedly apart of our nature.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Yes but it is something we can rise above.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

I think it is... its just not part of us fully... its there but not all the way because if it was then we'd all be serial killers... I mean its part of animals instinct is to kill if threatened or for survival but in humans our brain chemistry is complex and I have no idea what I'm saying but yeah idk I hope you guys get what I'm trying to say :x
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

What differentiates serial killers from the average human being has a lot less to do with the capacity for killing (almost all of us have that), but the factors which bring that attribute to the fore (e.g. disassociation, antisocial personality, psychotic break, etc.).
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Yeah, people always find reasons to kill other people. The root? Sin.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Human nature isn't that savage. It takes a serial killer years to build up the tolerance to kill with no remorse, and in the process they lose themselves, becoming immoral sociopathic husks.Even for a person to kill an animal they need to eat to survive comes with a level of guilt the first few times.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Most people would kill. It is like me killing someone just because I need to live or eat. Just like a animal. It is natural for us to kill for a reason. animals don't just kill for no reason. we are like a animal.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Most people wouldn't kill. The proof being that most people don't kill.It is natural for us to kill for a reason, I agree, it's unnatural for us to kill for no reason or for unimportant reasons. Most psychologically sound people find it difficult to kill. if it were their nature, it'd be easy.I also agree animals don't kill for no reason, animals kill to survive. Be it protecting their herd, or for reasons as simple as food, they are furthering their well being, using their nature to do it.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

so it is in are nature to kill. Just like most things. people do not kill that often anymore but still if the day comes we would kill but every thing about us has changed you don't see people go to war over a simple thing like food anymore.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

I don't believe that just because a person would do something, means that it is our nature to. A person would eat another person if it were absolutely necessary, some sooner than that, but that does not make it human nature to eat people.I firmly believe that if it were human nature it would not be such a chore to do so, and it would occur more often than it does.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

ok so if it not in human nature than it not in animal nature.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

Well you have to take in to consideration that humans have evolved. Our dietary habits, our mental capacity, and our nature as well. We are past savagely needing to kill, when we can solve most problems with concise communication, can find something to eat, pre-killed and and in a can in a grocery store no further than a mile away, and have loads of entertainment online in lieu of killing for sport.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

But still that does not matter it still was and still is apart of us that we have not let behind.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Mind my rhetoric but I think you missed the evolved part of my argument.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

You are conflating the capacity for killing with the action of killing. There are few if any human beings who lack the capacity for killing; it is an entirely natural possibility within the range of human behavior, and animal behavior generally.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

I argue that just because we have the capacity to do so, that it is not apart of our nature. Would you say cannibalism is also apart of our nature? Since I'm sure most humans would eat another to survive. Or how about performing acts against our principles? Since most humans would too do that to survive.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

I am sure that killing is apart of are nature and after we kill that person we were to eat him. if that was the reason to kill him for and even if that was not the reason. I think we would have eaten some of him and use the left overs as bait.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Of course killing is a part of nature, but humans are an unnatural part of nature. We don't kill, as a whole, as much as carnivorous animals.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

we are as national as anything gets. there is nothing that makes us different.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Well apparently one thing does. Our lack of a need to kill. Most people, as I said in my initial argument do not need to kill, be it for sustenance, to end a dispute, or for entertainment, since we have these things in plenty.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

you are thinking about today way of life. this is about ever since we came on this earth.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Did you read anything I typed? Since we came on earth we have adapted. We were born in the mud and just like any animal we had to kill to survive, then we evolved and were no longer in need of that nature. It dropped out of our nature.You are insisting that because humans can, and some do, kill that is our nature, but insist that it is not.I gave examples that some humans, eat other people, that does not make cannibalism our nature, some humans are incestuous that does not make incest our nature, some humans are pedophiles, zoophiliacs, necrophilacs, and the list goes on.Are you seriously trying to convince me that human nature is to have sex with dead, children, and animals and we are all, gay, straight, red, white and blue and every other conceivable thing any human has done ever? Get real.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

like I said it is in are nature we will always have it. It just does not evolve out of us. Just like they say that animal is nice now but it can turn on you. And no matter how much you make that animal better. Deep inside it. It still has that nature to kill you.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

So it is also in our nature to eat our children, rape our pets, make masks of the flesh of our ancestors, and any other twisted thing any human has ever done ever, is basically what you're saying?I'm sorry but I disagree.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

I am not saying that. but you are talking about personality or religion. But in us all we have nature that we were born with. what ever that nature is. it inside us and it may not show but inside us it still there.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Near the end I offered completely ridiculous examples of human actions, to see if you thought that those were human nature as well, I see now that was a mistake.To gain some understanding let me ask you this.Do you believe it is human nature to kill, because humans can? If that is not the reason, then why do you believe it is human nature to kill?
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

I don't say it is in human nature to kill, because humans can. I say it in are nature to kill for a reason. just like any other animal will kill for a reason.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Then you are arguing a different topic. It is nature to kill yes, it is not human nature to kill.Nature has killings happen all the time, for reasons, including the ones I've given and certainly others. Yet human nature is different than that. I have said how human nature is different in how it takes some mental preparation to flat out kill anything with more sentience than a bug, and for some even that much sentience.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

I am not talking about that. we don't always question should we kill or not. it apart of are nature to kill to survive just like anything. sometimes animals question should I kill or not. we are all animals. but we are different but we are still animals and it is in are nature to kill. should I kill or not. and sometimes I don't even question I just do it.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

Thank you. You have said what, I was refraining from saying this whole argument, so as not to give my opposition too obvious of a hint to the true answer of killing and human nature.You said, and I quote " it apart of are nature to kill to survive just like anything" The poor English aside, what you have basically said, is it is our nature to survive, and with that I agree. Human nature is founded on survival, killing not so much. Every human does what they can to survive all day, everyday, some try harder than others because of the circumstances they are in, yet not all of them choose to kill. Why is this? (Rhetorical question) The answer is because killing is not in our nature. if it was in our nature to kill, we would always kill, when our survival was threatened, yet most people will choose every option they can before choosing killing.I sincerely hope you read this argument, because I do think it's one of my best.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is apart of us

just like I said we don't always kill because we question. will should I waste my time killing when I can have other people do it for me. people and animals will question do I need to kill they will try to find any reason not to kill. But when it all comes down to it. that it just you out there you will kill to survive. it was born in to us to kill how do you think we survive so long is because we kill. we don't need to kill a person walking down the street because we have food at home. other animals do not always have that they do not always have food at there home so they got to go out and kill.
Debate: Is killing a part of human nature.
Side: it is not in us

You completely disregarded my argument, so after this one I will cease trying to prove what I know, to someone who refuses to accept it.You have not shown me how an animal questions it's kills. However I can prove that no animal I know of, asides from humans, questions it's kills. namely any of the numerous animal or insect fights you can find online. I won't post a link because they are so numerous you can literally search it and find it within seconds. In any of these fights, nothing signifies an end to the battle, except for the death and total annihilation of one side of the fight. It's the reasons pumas attack smaller prey, when they need food, and always go for the neck, ready to kill instantly. it's the reasons boa constrictors lock on to it's enemy's vein and don't stop constricting until the pulse has stopped.There I have completely defeated your point on animals questioning kills unless you can provide actual evidence, if you can not, do not bring it up again, because it's defeated.You say humans kill to survive, in my last argument I defeated that point. I won't repeat it because the argument is literally directly above this one. How about reading it before retrying a point( with no evidence no less) that was pretty much entirely defeated.You go on to tell me the difference between why humans kill and why animals, kill, reiterating a point I made in my very first argument (further evidence that this is fruitless because you aren't reading my arguments ble bloo blop bleep bleep did you catch that?) Yet you are neglecting that every human doesn't have these luxuries and still they don't all kill. Last time I will repeat this, then no more. If killing was human nature, every human would kill when their survival was threatened, no one would look for any other way. We do, look for other ways that is, proving that we are not as savage as the side you are arguing for claims.I'm done.