azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Are you joking? Really? I don't think that patriarchy or matriarchy should be the rule of society. I think a good balance of both would make this world a much better place. Things may be getting much worse but I still see men making most of the decisions, so you can't blame it on women. You must get rejected by women a lot, that's why you hate them so much. What? Did you not get hugged enough by Mommy? I grew up POOR in government housing. I was violated as a child, that is the worst thing that has ever happened to me! But thank you for assuming you know me or what I have been through. I watched my mother go through hell and back to put dinner on the table, even then she would go without eating to make sure her three children had enough.I still don't own a $50,000 car, much less make $50,000 in a year. If I had received a car for my 13th birthday, it would have been pointless considering you can't drive until you're 16 where I live. I did get a $300 car that I had to work for when I was 16 though.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Lol. wow. ED is quite good.http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Feminist All there is to know about yourself. :D Have fun.I can't take you seriously btw. Just so you know. I know you're getting your vagina hurt about all this which is why you try and make little insults.. but you wouldn't say shi to my face which I know in the end is the real truth.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Nice link, is that the only vagina you're able to see, the ones in pictures on the internet? I bet it is. Awwww....it's okay, don't be afraid to say it. I won't laugh, I promi....sorry couldn't lie! I would soooo laugh, in fact I'm laughing right now because I know I have figured you out. I only shared a little about myself that I am not ashamed to share. The only people who should be ashamed are my attacker and you. You should be ashamed because you have no compassion, no conscience. The only other people those qualities are missing from are serial killers. Do you go around killing prostitutes and fornicating with their dead corpses? So! You have seen vagina somewhere besides the internet!By the way, I would say it to your face! Ask everyone that knows me, male or female. If you'd like to fly on over to the US and the state of Georgia, I'll be glad to say it to your face. I don't take too kindly to threats, especially from ignorant morons.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

It's not a threat retard. You're just one of those people who say things over the internet and when you have to say it in real life you wouldn't. Yeah I probably would've knocked you out by now but that's just cause you talk waaaaayyyy too much shit. What would you've done?... sit there and moaned and cried.Figured me out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!Crazy woman thinks shes got someone FIGURED out!!! hahahhahaaaa!!!Just because I show her a link of a funny website!!!AHAHAAHAHAWow......... amazing.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

You really don't know me or what I would do. Why so many Caps and exclamation points? Did I strike a nerve?Real men don't hit women. I volunteered for a Battered Womens' Shelter for years. In my experience, men that hit women are really wimps because if they are faced with someone (a man) who matches their strength, they look like they are about to piss their pants. You are a bully and I feel sorry for you. Bullies treat people the way they treat them because they are trying to make up for their own inadequacies. I want to apologize to you for one thing and one thing only, I let a debate turn personal and that goes against my own beliefs about debating. I am glad not to know you in person, you are not worthy of my friendship or my time. Therefore, I will not argue with you anymore. Argue with yourself, if it pleases you.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

LOOOL Stop talking your shit darling.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Please Karma , be gentle .My belly can barely stand the laughter. Kinda , Stop talking your shit NOW darling.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Great.. just when this debate was gathering dust the stupid little bitch had to chat shit again.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

"Great.. just when this debate was gathering dust the stupid little bitch had to chat shit again."YES...YOU DID DIDNT YOU , STUPID LIL BITCH YOU ARE KINDA.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

shellyk....................................................................How i adore thee.Every word so true. Every little word.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

i dont know how you can say that men are more superior. you can do anything if you work hard enough for it. and really the raising kids things. there are soooo many stay at home dads and the woman work. times are changing now and you should open up your eyes. men can do any job that is more sterotypical for a woman and vice versa.p.s. we did almost have a female president. she ran but did not get the nomination. ur should check the facts before you say something
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

No, you had a woman run for presidency. You didn't ALMOST have a female president. Two completely different things.I know men are superior from what I see day to day. I don't mean superior in everything. There's things men are better at and there's things women are better at. Women make the house run, men make the world run. That's the difference. times are changing now and you should open up your eyesI've already noticed... read the post properly. I just don't agree with it.there are soooo many stay at home dads and the woman workThat's the problem with todays society.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

well seeing as how we have never had a woman try to run for president i would say that a woman trying to get the democrat nomination is pretty close. if u really think that men doing jobs that are more sterotypical for a woman is a problem in our society than u havin no clue at all
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

I have no clue about what?? Maybe I'm wrong.. but there's a definate correlation between kids being stupider, less respectful, more rebellious etc. than before and they role parents are having. I haven't got a problem with 1 or 2 men doing that for w/e reasons... but nowadays there's too many men not being men. And that I think is a problem.America has one of the highest divorce rates in the world and that alone would be a direct negative to childrens upbringing.. all because mummy or daddy slept with another person or one is gay or one is abusive or they're not good in bed (that one gets me the most) they've done something to please themselves instead of thinking about their families first i.e. they're selfish.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

about what else goes on in the world. men doing jobs that are more sterotypical is such a small thing in this world. its not even a problem. if we focused on others things maybe our world would be a better and safer place
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

You're right.. but I think that it's the small things that need sorting in order for the big things to be sorted. It's not 'men doing less stereotypical jobs' that is the problem. It's 'men not being menly' and 'women not being womenly' that is the problem. Going into specifics would take forever, but it's part of the root of the problems.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

........First of all, this SHOULD be taken seriously. Women have been oppressed throughout history and are still oppressed today! Women are raped, abused, treated like trash in many parts of the world. There are women in some parts of the world that aren't even allowed to drive. They need to wait for their sons and husbands to come home and drive them to their friends' house or the local grocery store. Step outside your little bubble and realize that this is an extremely serious issue that NEEDS to be talked about. You realize that your view of women being less intelligent than men is wrong... and instead of admitting your wrong, you laugh and act as if this isn't a big issue and it's simply a small group of women overreacting. The reason why have been looked down upon in history is because of the view of ignorant, stupid little men like YOU. You fail to acknowledge the intelligence of women because of your idiotic and shameless ignorance (I used the word shameless because you fail to realize that you are wrong). You blame their words for experiencing PMS, when in actuality, you have just insulted an entire gender, an entire sex. THAT is enough justification for women (AND MEN) to dispute your stupid claims speak up for for themselves. You idiot.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

The U.S. military has performed experiments on this exact topic many times and found that the majority or them don't have the mental and/or physical stamina to perform adequately in combat situations. I am not trying to offend any feminists who may be reading this right now (though I probably am) I'm just laying out the facts that the military has already come up with.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Please provide these so called experimental outcomes. I would like to see them. Since 2003 the United States military has had no problem sending female soldiers out to battle. I was in the Army and deployed 3 times, as I said earlier, so I am waiting for someone to tell me that I am not physically capable to do what I did, which was be in combat for 365 at a time, per deployment. Yes I had a weapon, yes I fired my weapon, yes my military drivers license has around 10 different vehicles I am trained and authorized to drive (and we aren't talking neon's). I am not the minority of females here, I am the majority of those that are in the military. So while you are laying out the facts, please lay out the the entire set, maybe a link to these so called experiments because during the entire time I was in the military, I took part in no such experiments.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Ok so you are one out of how many that could make it through the war? Please tell me. Because we have already had one person in this debate saying they went through it and it was hard to handle with.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Oh the MILITARY performed these studies. I automatically side with you now, even though you provide no evidence. Because the military is soooo trustable and all. You've wooed me. I give up all my arguments and all the research I've read to side with you.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

ohhhhh, I am automatically going to side with you now because people like you obviously know everything. Grow up. Maybe you should give some evidence for starters instead of stating some childish statement like that. Here is my evidence why.http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/01/26/13rd-of-women-in-us-military-raped/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/ july-dec10/womenvets_11-30.html watch the video it has evidence.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

All of this talk about physical stamina, rape, pregnancy etc is not why I am voting no. You have to ask yourself...what is a soldier ? A soldier pulls a trigger, carries things, runs etc - but to what point - what is the Army / Marines really trying to create - tier end point - the answer is ... A hyper aggressive testosterone driven trained Killer. If for some reason a soldier can't put his hands on a rifle, he has to be able to - without hesitation use his bare hands or whatever implement is available, like a trench digging shovel, pick it up, charge the enemy and bash someones brains into pulp with it, and do it again and again to avoid being killed, then get up the next day with a clear conscience and be able to go kill again and again...this is what the marines and army are trying to create - trained killers that have been stripped of their individuality, trained to follow orders, - go over the top into oncoming death, snarl, charge ahead at top speed and shoot the enemy in the face, watching their heads blow up like watermelons that have been smashed with a sledge hammer. Then high five their fellow soldiers, and go kill some more that day, and the next and the next. The army/marines is going to want yo to be able to get up every day and go kill people - period- they want you to love it, embrace it, paint your face with the blood of your enemy. And when the mission is over, they want you psychologically stable. Killing the enemy with maximum brutality and efficiency is what it's all about. Women are just not like this, women are not the material with which trained killers are made. Look at society in general - there aren't to many women murders in jail, historically women kill with poison because of the low risk of physical confrontation - not face to face with a hammer. I just don't see my mother / sister / wife (maybe) / daughter being able to kill with a snarl on their face and repeatedly -I think maybe some women could - once - but then they would be a mental wreck. In the Killin business of combat infantry - it's kill quickly and repeatedly - or be killed - the team with the highest body count wins in war. Women just aren't hormonally attuned to be professionally trained killers. I think with the right training most men have the inner killer instinct / capacity to be molded into killing machines - women just don't.
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: No

Of course , we can say that women should fight for what they believe in. But what we REALLY should think about is that they die for the country, they kind of take men responsibilities ( i'm not a dude) . But i think it's kind of hard to lose a member of his family because he/she went to fight for the country. And besides , do you people really think that combating is somewhere a good choice of dealing with the "enemy" (you're going to think that i'm crazy or some "peace in the world" person) but seriously my mum lost her grand-mother because she was helping the US army and she's still chocked about it ( who cares, well a lot of people actually) I also think that it's beautiful the help the country we're leaving in but in my opinion it's hard for a woman to die because of the army , but it's a personal choice and we can't argue on it
Debate: Should woman be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. Military
Side: yes

Are you implying that it is worse for a woman to lose her life in service than it is for a man? If so, it follows that you consider men more expendable than women, both to their families and their country. I think there are a lot of people who would have a problem with that.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

If you're old enough to be tried as an adult for killing people at the age of 15..then you should be able to vote at the age of 15.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

It is the same how the government takes taxes from children. If children's money hard earned money is going to the government, i think the children have the "right" to vote what their money should go to.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

You are absolutely correct! Plus, youth are part of the country too, we deserve to be treated like citizens!
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

I do not think that we should be penalised for our age, especially when a lot of us are more knowledgeable than the average adult. It is a discrimination made by the government that believes in a right to be heard. Any government who does not agree that youth should be able to vote should not have the right to say the words "freedom of speech".
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: No, they shouldn't

I got a counter argument...Because children can be tried as adults, then the law must not forbid a child having sex with an adult.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

I don't know why i got a downvote. It seems like a great counter argument.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

Even though it is horrifying, You shouldn't have gotten that down vote XD. It was a good argument.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

Coming from a young person, I think that youth should be given the right to vote. I know more responsible youth than irresponsible. I would trust most of my friends with a voting ballad. In fact, a lot of my friends are more politically involved than most adults are! Also, youth are bound to be more informed than adults because youth are constantly using social media where news sources and politics advertise and post to. If we can trust youth to drive cars, make their own purchases, support the economy and work, why can't we trust them with a ballad?
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

But we don't trust youth who do that because no youth do! At 16 you barely even touch on the things you said- at 18 you do; hence the voting age
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

Adolescence is an artificial creation of modern society, in more primitive societies a 13 year old was considered a man/women and allowed to live on their own. It isn't the case anymore due to the amount of training we have to go though to be productive in our society, however economic productivity should not be the measure of the ability to vote. Youth below 18 and above 15 certainly are capable of understanding the world around them and their best interests, and to not allow them to vote is to create a marginalized group where there need be none.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

There should be no age limit on voting. If you want to vote you should be allowed to vote no matter how old you.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: No, they shouldn't

should youth votes below an age before certain developments occur carry a lower weight? After all, a toddler would just push buttons.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

How could you fairly make certain votes carry a lower weight? Assuming anyone of any age is allowed to vote, and a highly intelligent and mature 8 year old votes, should their vote count less than that of a uninformed and immature 9 year old? I think trying to "weight" votes is just telling people that just because someone is older than you, their opinion means more.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

True, but its meant as a temporary compromise .
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: No, they shouldn't

But really when you are older you at least have a broader sense of the country you live in- does an 8 year old know about issues in their country?
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

I agree. If one is smart enough to have an interest in politics, one is smart enough to make an X on a ballad.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

Yes! If one is intelligent enough to have a political opinion, one should be intelligent enough to put that opinion to use!
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

Age limits are VERY, VERY crude and inaccurate way of determining how informed someone is. The whole idea that which youth comes ignorance, while it has some merits, is not true for the majority of the people I know.-Of course this is never going to happen simply because of misconceptions about youth. And giving voting rights to youth would then require politicians to give a shit about young people. Republicans would never stand for it.-Finally, why can't those under 18 with a job vote? They are taxed but have no representation in their elected government. Whatever happened to "No taxation without representation."In general, young people need to shut up about having more power and rights. But on voting, we deserve some type of representation.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

First of all, when you swear, it's a sign that you do not have the vocabulary skills to express your feelings differently. So, if you want to present a reasonable argument and look smart, don't use curse words.Secondly, youth are IMMERSED in information every day through social media. Yes, adults are involved in social media however, youth are native to websites like Facebook and Twitter so they are prone to discovering information through that media.Third, discriminating against someone because of their age is like discriminating someone because of their race or sexual orientation. In 1960, it was the people like you who would say "People of color need to shut up about having more rights." Do you really want to be that person?...didn't think so.Forth, politicians should care about youth! Youth are the future of this country, don't you care about the future? And if you don't, you're the one who is being ignorant!
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: Yes, they should

when you swear, it's a sign that you do not have the vocabulary skills to express your feelings differently.You can't judge a person's linguistic ability on whether one swears or not. Furthermore, you have a very warped idea of debate anyway. Debating is not about "expressing your feelings". It is about expressing one's opinions and/or thoughts. What one feels or does not feel about an issue cannot be used as justification for one's view.So, if you want to present a reasonable argument and look smart, don't use curse words.In any case, you don't seem to be able to present reasonable arguments (and, arguably, you don't appear to be intelligent at all) even without swearing. Every single one of your criticisms are merely attacking straw men.Apollo has not said that youth should not be given the right to vote. In fact, he espouses the opposite view! Read his arguments carefully. Your criticism of him is unjustified and I think that you owe him an apology.
Debate: Should Youth be Given the Right to Vote?
Side: No, they shouldn't

... the grey word up there ^^ annoys me greatly .