azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Should Religion Be Abolished?
Side: Nah

For the optimal gaming experience fnaf games, make sure your Internet connection is of the highest caliber. As long as you have access to one of the smart gadgets with an internet connection, you can play any games whenever and wherever you choose.
Debate: Should Religion Be Abolished?
Side: Nah

The principle you mentioned aligns with the concept of individual freedom and personal autonomy. It suggests that individuals should have the freedom to express their thoughts, beliefs, and actions as Amanda The Adventurer long as they do not harm or violate the rights of others. This perspective is often associated with principles of tolerance, free speech, and respect for individual liberties.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

The US is based in the Constitution, which said that the government should not be based in a sole religion. However, when the US is gone in about 40 years or so, then a theocracy should rise in the name of Christ.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

The USA prides itself on being a free country, with free people. Free people have freedom of religion and don't want a bias towards one religion. People who want a religious bias are authoritarian and closed minded. Let spirituality be a private/spiritual community thing, not a law.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Who said that it was going to be a law for everyone to be Christian under my monarchy?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

You are role model of Christian drone, that's why .
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Are other religious institutes allowed... and, monarchy? As in supreme unquestionable leadership?Heil Lolzors!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Yeah, other religious institutes will be allowed under my theocratic monarchy.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

But do they have the same rights as your Christian churches?And what happens to people who commit serious crimes according to the bible, but not according to current law? Such as adultery... &c. What about state education? Are there changes here?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

People do not have rights.People will be dealt with in a gracious and just manner.State education is a maybe.. either complete education funded by the state or none whatsoever.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

No education is even an option? Do you want to brutally murder your economy?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I don't care about the economy. Plus, the economy is irrelevant to formal education.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

If people are not well educated, they can't get jobs, conduct business... in other words your country will be unable to compete with others and you won't be able to tax very much, so you won't be able to invest very much.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Well the good news would be he wouldn't be ruler for long.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I don't care about competing with other countries. I don't care about taxing very much. All each person needs to know is how to do the job that they are going to conduct. If there is no formal education, then it can be passed down through apprenticeship.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

'e Co No Mi Ca Le Co Lla PseSu Bsi Sta Nce Le Ve Le 'e Co No MySta Rva Tio Ne, Poo Re Hea Lth Ca Re(Do N't 'a Sk)
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I don't care about the economyAnd yet you want to be a ruler.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

The economy is pointless. The government should care about the people and the retention of morality.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

How much liberty do you have in your fucked up theocracy if any at all?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

There will be plenty.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

You are saying There will be plenty as if you have limitations on genuine liberty. You can't just have limitations on genuine liberty and expect your society to be good?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I don't believe there to be genuine liberty. There is no such thing. However, there will be plenty to allow for a good life.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

I have my own definition for genuine liberty, freedom without harming the rights of other citizens. Morally I don't have any faith in a society that does not follow by that code.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Except that there are not such things as a "rights".
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Yes there are, your simple existence in entirety is a right!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

No it is not. Who said that because I have existence, I then have a right to it?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

The fact fact that you can get killed, this takes your existence away (most evidence shows this to be true.)
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

And if you are killed, then your rights have been taken away. That means that they are not unalienable, which means that they are not rights.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

No that just means rights are not inalienable (the correct term for unalienable) so rights are still real. In the dictionary it says the definition of rights are entitlements to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way, so rights are really just privileges inalienable right are just fantasy.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Alright, so rights are justifiable ability for the retention of X. Who justifies it, though?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Yeah pretty much.Comment filler being used once again to get away with breaking 50 comment policy.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Who justifies it?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

The the people who take them away can also justify them.Once again comment filler.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

...Take a geography lesson or two.The economy is more recoverable than something like the environment, but with a bad economy the country sucks. Unless you go completely subsistence, which puts you at risk from environmental changes and bordering countries.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

You are missing the point......
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Which is?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

The economy is not what matters; education will be implemented as apprenticeships, which will keep up the people's jobs and their economy booming. When I say that the economy doesn't matter I'm saying that it is one of the least of worries, if any the last.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Then what is important?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Morality and peace.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Morality is subjective and the condition of peace comes from diplomacy, compassion and wisdom. Welfare of the citizens: their quality of living, ability to reach their full potential, freedom... is more important.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

People will be dealt with in a gracious and just manner. What happens when everybody moves out of your fucking country and move to England and you have a problem with prosperity?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I don't know. If that happens, then we will see. However, I predict that the majority of people will actually enjoy the rule.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

People don't have rights Oh yeah like people will enjoy that, go ahead see what happens.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

It doesn't matter what people think or what they want to have: people do not have rights.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

And that is why they will not enjoy your society. Ha Ha caught you!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

That doesn't follow.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

In your fantasy land that doesn't follow, I knew that it was practically imposable for you to even make it into that position but now I proved the outcome as being negative, you lose!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

You haven't proven anything.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

It is pretty much a fact that the people will not like your society and you denying kinda proves something.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

No way in Hell! A theocracy is a totalitarian dictatorship!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Not necessarily; however, I am intending a monarchy, which is different.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

...Would I get dental ?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

A government rules by religion is a theocracy. .
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

This debate didnt ask if religion should run the government. It just said should religion influence US Law. Influence doesnt imply control. It just means that it can bring about a new law or something. Like when the bible says thou shall not murder. I think everyone can agree that is wrong. These types of things are acceptable. It doesnt imply that we will have a theocracy.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Good point. But where does it end? .
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Welcome back dark age :D
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

(1) Is that a problem?(2) Having a theocracy doesn't necessarily mean that we will be like the ones before.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

All preset theocracies are dictatorships, all past were dictatorships.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

(1) Is that a problem?(2) As Aristotle says, the best kind of government is a monarchy as long as it is uncorrupted.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

If you don't see a problem with brutal theocratic dictatorships you would love it in Somalia.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

(1) Who says that dictatorships have to be brutal?(2) Who says that theocracies have to be brutal?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Dictatorships are allays brutal with no exception. It's a rule of very few people who can keep them self in power by keeping everybody else in constant fear. Theocracies are even worst, they shift knowledge and ban science or anything that would ago against their teaching.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Dictatorships are allays brutal with no exception.That is incorrect.It's a rule of very few people who can keep them self in power by keeping everybody else in constant fear.That is incorrect.Theocracies are even worst, they shift knowledge and ban science or anything that would ago against their teaching.That is incorrect.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Dictatorships are allays brutal with no exceptionIf they become "mild" people will upraise... that killed USSR..It's a rule of very few people who can keep them self in power by keeping everybody else in constant fear. That is accurate rulling minority with General, King, Supreme Leader in front who rules by power.Theocracies are even worst, they shift knowledge and ban science or anything that would ago against their teaching.Show me theocracy that has no problem with people speaking against the regime's religion.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

lolzors, I have known you to have more compelling arguments then "that is incorrect".
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I'm tired of debating nox. I just let him go. If he can't understand that he is committing the composition fallacy, then so be it.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Haha, you both have different foundations and delivery methods for you arguments. You may be right to let it go. As would he.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Smart man that Aristotle, but he didn't have all the information available. A lot has changed in 2300 years
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

The same logic applies today. The only thing is that most monarchs are evil, not good.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

The quality of a monarchy or dictatorship relies on the quality of a single or small set of individuals. Even if the quality is very high, it cannot be assured into the next generation.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Of course it can't be assured. No government can be assured because within every nation there is always someone who doesn't like the rule. The point is that a monarchy will allow for things to get done and will allow for good to happen as long as the monarch is not evil.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

The difference in assurance is duration. The rule of law can last for generations. The rule of a man can last for 1 lifetime.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Unless you institute a successorship. ;)
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

And what happens when you successor become power hungry? As a wise man once said, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Plato said that an aristocracy is, in theory, the best form of government. Now, just to clarify, an aristocracy is not rule by the wealthy. That is a plutocracy. An aristocracy is a government that is ruled by the most intelligent, most qualified citizens. The intellectual elite would run the country. If you are intelligent, you will be able to see problems that others cannot, predict future problems, and deal with them accordingly. Unfortunately, only a few percent of the population can be considered highly intelligent, and the more power held by less people, the more dangerous corruption becomes. It is more difficult to corrupt 100 politicians than 10 aristocrats, or 1 monarch.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Absolute power doesn't corrupt. It simply brings out the true nature of the man.Plato said that the best form of government would be the philosopher-kings. Aristotle, then, said that the best form of government is the monarch. Combine those together and you get a monarch who is philosopher king.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Which the true nature of man is usually dominance. We are primates, after all. It is written in our genetic code. Power has the capacity to corrupt everyone. Absolute power has the power to corrupt absolutely. It isn't 100%, there are those who would not abuse such power. But what is there to stop an absolute dictator from becoming a tyrant? Nothing, not without a separation of powers.And philosopher-kings are not a form of government, but a specific set of rulers. Both Plato and Aristotle were advocates for an Aristocracy, the rule by the best. Aristotle even said that tyrannies were unstable. (rule by one person with absolute power, as per the classical definition)Besides, what does this have to do with religion influencing US law anyways? If you want to continue this debate, shall we make a new one somewhere else? It shall be fun, me thinks.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Power doesn't corrupt; it simply brings out the true nature of the man. The only thing to stop someone from being a tyrant is for their nature to not be evil. The only way for that to be is for someone to be Christian.Plato was an advocate for a group of philosopher-kings to rule; Aristotle was an advocate for a monarch, if it were to be uncorrupted, and a democracy, if corrupted. Aristotle differentiated between a monarch and a tyranny.A theocracy will be instituted under the name of Christ.Here is Aristotle's government chart:Uncorrupted vs. Corrupted Government1) Monarchy vs. 6) Tyranny2) Aristocracy vs. 5) Oligarchy3) Timocracy vs. 4) Democracy
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

That is terrible, the US will not be gone and there will never be a theocracy replacing it. As an Atheist I think that is terrible speculation!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Yes.*
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

If it doesn't fall on its own, then I will become president and institute a theocracy of my own. Be warned; it is coming.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

then I will become president and institute a theocracy of my ownIt seems my suspicions about you are correct.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Which is?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Loop-the-loop
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

First of all dumbass nobody is going to vote for you, Conservative dumbasses won't vote for you because you literally plan to rip up the constitution and destroy America! Second of all if you lie to the American people about all of this shit I will tell them the truth and if they don't agree with me Congress will get you impeached when president so you have no chance motherfucker!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

You are missing one thing: I'm just not going to tell anyone that my plan is to create a theocracy until I have Congress on my side.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Well congress will figure out you plan they will have you impeached!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Well congress will figure out your plan they will have you impeached!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

We will see, now, won't we? ;)
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

This is all bullshit anyway, first of all before presidency will you be a senator or congressman? Will you be a Republican, Democrat or Libertarian? How will you get your campaigns started? How will you win voters over in your party's primary? And then how will you win voters over in the general election? I have no doubt in my mind that even if you somehow attempt to run for president (which we both know you won't) you have no chance in hell of even being able to get elected into any political office never mind the presidency!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

I'm a quasi-Communist-Fascist, which is what the Bible teaches in Acts, in a sense. Everything else I don't know. I'll just trust in God and mighty things will happen!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Okay Okay (Bullshit.) How about this, while you have faith God will pull your theocratic world crushing success out of his ass, I will have faith that you will not get that bullshit success (and I will still continue to be an Atheist.)
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Just be prepared for it to happen
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

How will congress be able to take your side, nobody likes a theocrat in America!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

God can do many great things!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

God can do many great things! my ass! God can't do shit! There is barely any evidence for God's existence there are people that do not even believe Jesus Christ was a person! He barely answers anybody's prayers and does not pull any "Jesus karma" out of his ass when people "sin", break his commandments or believe in something else! The fact that we still have religious diversity alive in this country and God has not "smited" anybody is big evidence that there is no God or anything else!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Oh no... you are a new atheist....
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

What the hell does that mean? He rose valid points that you ignored. Also, he is one of many "new atheists" because guess what? Atheism is on the rise faster than ever before. So much so that in 40 years when the US will apparently collapse atheism will be a majority and christianity will be a joke. Well, it already is a joke but right not not that many people get it. But they will. more and more do every day
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Except that he didn't raise good points. Most historians believe Jesus to have been real. And the US will collapse because if atheism... That was a point
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

He never asserted that all or even most people believe Jesus wasnt real. He only said that there are people that dont think he was real which is true. How will a disbelief in God cause the collapse of the US and nothing else: ruling out the economy, wars, resource conflicts, overpopulation, and anything else natural. please id like to know. Id also like to know how you account for Norway, Sweden, Finland and England (among others) for being quite successful as of late while having significantly higher atheist populations than the US and who have removed religion from much of their societies including their governments.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Those countries have a distinct ethnicity. America has a mixed ethnicity.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Ethnicity has nothing to do with religion. Wtf ?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Actually it does. Ethnic uniformity brings unity. When there isn't, then there is chaos. When people become tired of the chaos, then they will turn to unity, which will be under a monarch.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

yeah, ethnic uniformity brings ethnic unity, not religious unity. Theres no statistics or evidence to suggest that any given race is more apt to choosing a certain religion provided there are reasonable circumstances. What i mean is of course 99% of all middle eastern peoples are Muslim. But that isnt because they are middle eastern ethnicity. its because if they arent muslim they get killed and theyre brainwashed into it. With civilized, religiously free places like the US and Sweden theres absolutely no links between race and religion.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

So fucking what, if you get your theocratic wish I will probably move to England where they will have more freedom! Honestly I'd recommend you'd fuck up Canada, nobody want's America to turn out the way you want it.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

So move to. England.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

No No No No No No nobody want's you to have any effect on society, and if you get your wish I will move to England but you probably won't so I'm not gonna worry besides Can't you somehow spare this country for another country anyway?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

It is going to happen. Be prepared for it to happen. If you don't want to love in one, then move to England
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Why are you stating It is going to happen as if it is a fact? There are plenty of things that will stand in your way of the plan, mainly the things I already explained and more!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Except that it will most likely happen. Be prepared for it to happen because it is coming.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

No, it really is not likely to happen at all. America might end but I doubt it is in 40 years but that is more likely than your bullshit theocracy!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

Thats fine if you don't want to believe me that it will happen. However, it will happen and life will be wonderful!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

No life in your theocracy will be living hell for every fucking citizen!
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: Yes

How so?
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

Nobody will have Religious liberty, you can not control what people think.
Debate: Should religion influence U.S law?
Side: No

You just did .