Debate: IS the USA the greatest country.
Side: Citizens should be apologetic.

"You need to analyzed the situation more closely. The United States is not afraid to use nuclear weapons; "Thats what I said." what nuclear arms-possessing country would be if they are in a desperate situation enough to move to their last resort(nukes)."You had the choice of invading japan or nuking them, you chose the nuke, that's not a last resort." Its the fact that we have been in several wars since the last time we used nuclear weapons and have not used them since that shows that the USA is extremely cautious of their utilization."you can't compare these several "wars" to the world war two. I shall remind you that your so-called "wars" are interferances with middle-eastern countries, who are apparently "threatening" you with nuclear weapons(now where have we heard that before?). What if a powerful country like Russia or France declared war on you, I bet your government would be pushing those buttons like crazy."A threat is a measure of intent."Threat: something that is a source of dangerYou haven't disposed your nukes and therefore have the intention to use them."The US has no intention of nuking a country such as Madagascar, for example, therefore they should not be threatened by us."And what if your government changes to one of hostile intent? or global domination? if no-one is threatened how come they're all building missile defences."Nor do you have the ability."How can you judge something I haven't given you? "The blabber that comes out of your mouth is indefensible as it is random."Random means I'm unpredictable and my arguments can be easily defended, it shows how good a judge you are."I just don't understand you. First you told me to find an example. I replied by saying that an example would be any argument you have ever posted. You then say I am incapable of providing an example. Ingenious....."You told me to go look at any of my arguements and I found that none of them that were "pointless". I then asked you to select one of these arguments to prove your point and you were unable to or was just too lazy(typical of americans) to move your finger to click on the mouse button a few times."The Japanese had defenses against an American invasion."They aren't stupid you know, they're not going to let you walk into their capital." Should have we invaded Japan? "It's what the rest of us would have done."(the total loss of life in this situation would probably have been higher than dropping the atomic bombs)"So just because they defended their country you thought it justifiable to destroy 225,000 of their citizens.http://www.aasc.ucla.edu/cab/200708230009.html "A cop carries a gun. Should I not feel safe next to one?"Your country is the only "civilised" place to allow an everyday policemen to carry guns. Not only do your cops carry guns but your citizens do to, in a television program some presenters drove across Alabama with messages painted on their cars and just because their opinion differed to the citizens of Alabama thought it legal to stone and shoot them. You clearly have the wrong definition of "safe".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Gear:_US_Special "Doubt it. You probably didn't know how long the war was lol."What do you mean "doubt it" that's a fact, you retard, and of course I know how long the war was. Do you even know what exaggeration means?(oh, wait you're american, I shouldn't be surprised)"It was not a threat to their existence." You threatened their empire, that's them. Your country won't understand how protective countries are to their empires."It was a threat to their ability to wage war on innocent people. "Your one to talk, claiming it's ok to nuke towns of innocents."The naval base at Pearl Harbor was actually established before WW2."The Japanese Empire was established before WW1 "Its not like we built it just in case we decided to go after Japan."You don't just build a huge fleet of ships with no intention to use them."Really? lol Did Japan occupy Alaska?"Of course they didn't, the whole text was about the Pacific."Notice the source to back it up as well as the amazing detail offered in regard to the attempt to surrender."I have argued with americans many times before and nearly all have been unable to understand the sources therefore I have had to clearly highlight the bits that prove my argument. Either way you didn't disagree with me but merely stated my debating tactics, next time actually argue."It was a part of Japanese culture to save face. Make no mistake, they did not want to surrender."Are you actually retarded? In my previous argument not only did I provide a source clearly station that japan wanted to surrender but I also highlighted it as well, you then proceed to claim that Japan didn't want to surrender without any comment to the source."Oh so I guess we were showing a country like Nigeria not to "trifle with" us?"Why did you bring Nigeria into it?"Yeah, I stopped reading that sentence when I saw this."I doubt you would understand half the words in the "oxford Reading Dictionary" so I chose a source which you could understand."lol no you arent. nice try though"Not only can you apparently read my thoughts but you can travel back in time to do so.I'll spell it out for you I W-A-S (thats was by the way) laughing, that is not an argument but a fact which you could not possibly argue against successfully, it was a statement not open for debate but an insult to you.