azza1625/createdebate-arguments huggingface dataset:
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

To be fair, I have no problem with people who believe in any god. As long as they don't try to drag me into it. But at the same time i can't believe in a god. Because really, the only thing that religions have in proving that there is a god, is some old books. News flash, anyone can write a book about that creation of humans. But then again people could have planted millions of dinosaur skeletons all over the planet, but lets be honest, that is so unrealistic that it is funny. Science proves a lot and it also disproves a lot, in which case it proves that evolution happened. It doesn't say that there is a god, but if there was/is then he/she/it doesn't do anything for or against the human race. This is my opinion and it might be a little harsh against Religion in general and that is also why I usually keep this to myself. It can hurt people feelings and really i believe that there are more important things that to prove that there is no God. WE have the right to believe and do so. I will talk my opinion when it is needed to be heard. Not just to be an ass.
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

Sorry, if you are over 4 you shouldn't believe myths........................................
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

If people can come up with Superman, they can easily come up with this "figure in the heavens" fiction thousands of years ago.
Debate: Is there God?
Side: Yes

Making up a superhero is 1 thing,but finding evidence to back something.or someone's statements is another. Lets say there was an Ice Age & a meteor caused it,dun you think the bones would've shattered,because of their size,rather than going underground?
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

No, I don't believe in a God. But I think that there is something out there. Maybe whatever it is is looking over us... or maybe it's not. I don't think that's something we can test. But I can't shake the feeling that there is something. I'm not quite sure if it's a human, a creature, an energy, or one of the countless deities in the world, but it seems so depressing to just to live a life completely alone. Maybe it's just because I'm one of those people who needs something to believe in. I don't really care all that much if I'm wrong (in the end, it won't matter anyways), all I know is that it makes me feel better to think that there's someone watching over us.But whatever, to each his own, right?
Debate: Is there God?
Side: Yes

Check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcPWU59Luoc Might help.
Debate: Is there God?
Side: Yes

This is a good one too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU0PYcCsL6o
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

Those are both really interesting!I haven't heard of Alan Watts before, but he has really cool ideas.Thanks :)
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

No problem! There are a ton of videos with his lectures. I made a debate about one: http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Do youagreewiththis_videoAnother person with similar ideas was Aldous Huxley. You've probably heard of him. He was the author of Brave New World.
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

Cool I'll check more of their lectures out :)And thanks, I hadn't really seen this perspective on spirituality and such. I think it fits a lot better with my ideas, Christianity didn't really cut it. :)
Debate: Is there God?
Side: No

Once you "awaken" you will have an easier time picking out the truths in the Bible. I think that Jesus' original message was corrupted and used for political gain.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Can anyone explain these three studies?http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/ 10/09/study-life-after-death/16963061/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2503370/Quantum-physics-proves-IS-afterlife-claims-scientist.html http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/german-scientists-prove-there-is-life-after-death/
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Yes, they are effects of religious propaganda, i.e. false studies with no scientific credit
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I'd say that they are real studies, but skewed, probably due to hallucinations caused by religious orientations of the subjects themselves.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

usatoday and dailymail are known media sources. They are not Snopes. Prove they are false.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

No, actually, the dailymail article is terrible. If he actually has a proof, I'd like to see it, rather than seeing 'Quantum Physics' and expecting it to be right. Biocentrism, or the theory of same nature, is an archaic one from philosophy that has nothing to support itself but is just not self-contradictory so it is still accepted. But it isn't nearly complete and thus isn't really falsifiable. It is meant to be an answer to 'Why is there anything at all?' As to the quantum physics part, that branch in physics, for such results, demands calculations and mathematical proofs. It is the most non-intuitive branch of physics. No proof was claimed - and as much as I am willing to read that article - there are mindless references to various other controversial theories that also have no proof.Also, the other 2 are due to hallucinations by expectations of subjects themselves, false memories, or something lacking in our information of how brain works. Likely one of former 2. The NDE hallucinations are not consistent, and conducted usually on theists or agnostics. Find consistent results with atheistic antitheists, preferably someone from analytic philosophers, to be taken seriously. Thus, the articles are misleading and biased enough already. And you are quoting unreliable articles as definite proofs of your statement. Only due to benefit of doubt is your proposition still supportable. I claim that an eternal afterlife will be in an omnipotent teapot revolving around earth and collecting souls. Everything vague can not be proven wrong.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Apparently, biocentrism isn't an archaic theory (it seems to be a result of atheism). And it was proposed by a doctor (so much for my claim). But the sources are still biased and unreliable. I'd never support such a theory without definitive proof. And the way it was written in the article, well, I'd rather read conspiracy theories for news than such articles, even though both seem roughly the same.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Interesting. How much did they pay the participants? Sounds really crazy to participate. One comment, the same experience regardless of religion or beliefs isnt an indication all would end in the same place. The bright light isnt judgement. Judgement day in scripture is at the end of the age. So the light could be the angels standing guard of the gate. Jesus raised Lazarus after he had begun to smell. So we don't know what happens beyond these 20 minutes. There appears to be something as seen in this experiment. But, since it wasnt technically "their time," then would they have gone beyond the initial death experience, if it were not yet their time? And is there an "appointed" or "pre-known" time? So even though their consciousness remained, in hovering awareness, if there is a "known time" that is only completed through time of real death, then possibly the fullness of the experience did not present itself during the death in the experiment.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Yes, but not in the conventional sense of what Heaven and/or Christianity teach.Life is energy and energy changes its forms or gets stored up in other ways. Your life energy surely goes somewhere after your body stops moving. Whether it's decaying as food for a tree to grow on top of you or an energy somehow returning to a pool of energy feeding life on earth, I don't know.But what it's assuredly not is you walking through a gate to a cloud city with streets of gold and an authority figure waiting to either give you an eternity of bliss or to send you to be turned into sausage forever and ever.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

You claim to know assuredly that you are exempt from Hell and God does not personally rule over heaven. How do you know this? When did you become better and smarter than your brother.....oops, not the devilish brother; I mean when did you become smarter and better than God?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

When people challenge your paradigm the only response you ever give is that within your paradigm they are wrong and arrogant and will be punished. In that respect we're never even in the same debate.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

You said you know assuredly......try to focus on your own words and thoughts and explain how you know assuredly the things you claim to know. If you know these things assuredly, shouldn't everybody know? Please tell.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

My assuredly is no different from your assuredly. It's as simple as that.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

You avoided explaining how you know assuredly that God does not rule over Heaven and there is no eternal punishment of sinners in Hell. How do you know these things?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Because yours is a fairy tale. It's like asking me to tell you how I know gnomes and dragons and the chupacabra don't exist. I actually don't. But all those things listed are equal or more likely than that an omnipotent dude is doing all the things you claim him to be doing.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I'm pretty sure there is a chupacabra on the Taco Bell dollar menu.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Hurray! The chupacabra has died for our sins! We're saved!Now let's wait decades and then each of us can write our own explanation of what happened to the chupacabra and what it means. That's the most accurate way to make sure people worldwide understand it and can build their lives around it centuries from now.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

You do realize there are heavy weights in consistency and singularity of message. Christianity is seen in the Old Testament. Everything we believe comes from, and fulfills everything the Jews believe. The Jews waited for Him, and as foretold they rejected. It was by rejection that the Gospel was driven out to all nations. Then Jesus is going full circle in the end to take His place in Jerusalem. After some catastrophic events there in the middle east. Here is an example of consistency. With fulfillment outside of what they understood. The Jewish scriptures told of a time the Israelites were being bitten by scorpians or serpents and dieing while wandering in the desert. God's solution He told Moses to post a serpent staff and all who are bitten and look at it will be healed.There was never an explanation for it. Mysterious, said once, never referenced or practiced. Like a one time solution. The next time its mentioned, its found as an old relick and the Jews set it up and worshiped it. And then God corrects etc. But no explanation on the purpose. Then Jesus refers to it out of the blue and applies it to His up coming crucifiction. He said would be lifted up like Moses lifted the serpent in the wilderness.Moses holding the serpent up representing the law, for people to face and be healed by looking at it in the face, Jesus defines it as sin and judgement of being under the law, and Messiah would be lifted up on it in ransome. And Moses lifting it up in the wilderness and Jesus descending upon it and lay His life down on it. Well thats explained in Genesis, where the story line was laid out. And you can connect it forward as the Catholics have brass crosses with Jesus still on them. Catholocism is featured in end time prophesies. So after the one time work, following Him is beyond the brass cross above the bed. Its threads like this brass serpent told about once, then idolized without understanding it. And a picture of the law giver Moses lifting it up and the Son of God decending to die on it. And to have His people stop and idolize a piece of brass after. God said, Genesis 3 And I will put enmityBetween you and the woman,And between your seed and her seed;He shall bruise you on the head,And you shall bruise him on the heel.”16 To the woman He said,“I will greatly multiplyYour pain in childbirth,In pain you will bring forth children;Yet your desire will be for your husband,And he will rule over you.”
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

The Bible, is it accurate to a t? Science is catching up, not the other way around. We knew things by faith that science learned later. Science confirms Biblical accuracy. Its our misunderstanding and denial of it that closes our understanding.Example Seawater follows currents in the ocean.Psalm 8:8: “The fish of the sea that pass through the 'paths of the seas.' ”The Bible indicates that there are “paths” in the ocean where the water follows a predictable course. Indeed, the interaction of numerous factors (including geography, temperature, salinity, prevailing winds and the Coriolis effect) creates currents with dramatic influence over regional transit, climates and marine life.Yet these paths in the sea were not extensively studied until the mid-1800s, when Lt. Matthew Fontaine Maury of the U.S. Navy began scouring old sailors’ logs for information about wind and ocean movements. Maury’s study of the Bible (which he “constantly read and frequently quoted,” according to naval historian Capt. Miles DuVal) may have convinced him that he would find patterns, and find them, he did!Describing the impact of Maury’s first “Wind and Current Chart” on navigation, DuVal wrote, “Previously the average passage from New York to San Francisco required 188 days but in 1851, the Flying Cloud … made this voyage in 89 days and 21 hours.” Studying the “paths of the seas” turned out to be a lucrative innovation!https://lifehopeandtruth.com/bible/is-the-bible-true/how-do-we-know-the-bible-is-true/meteorology-oceanography-and-the-bible/
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Science is catching up, not the other way around. We knew things by faith that science learned later. Science confirms Biblical accuracy.You be sure to let me know when science shows fruit trees growing without the sun.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Light. God is light. You only understand sunlight from solar energy. Its a star. Angels are stars. Lucifer the bright morning star fell. Stars implode when they fall. So if our universe of black space originated, this may be the first debree expelled into what we know as our universe. God is light that stars are made from. He is light that made beings and servants of light. So fruit trees could grow without sun, because God is light.And if you study it, you find the sequence of creation to be more informative than previously thought, as well as multidimentional in the Scriptures purpose.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Angels are stars.Then did angels exist before "he made the stars also" on day 4?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Yes, they did exist. there are many types of angels. The stars in the sky may correlate to angels for each of us. Lucifer is the bright morning star that fell. So yea the angels existed before day one. Day 1 was the day heaven and earth were made. And they are of star qualiity. And when God placed the hosts in the sky He appointed times. And also there is a connection with being numbered like the stars. And Jesus talks about each having an angel. So each in a way can represent each of us. Thats a thought not doctrine.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

And also science has made presumptions, even when proven wrong they leave in text books. Dating carbons etc have properties that cant exist in the time frames given. So the inaccuracies from the beginnings, invalidate the later conclusions built on it. So then what, should we ignore inaccuracies for the sake of false premises built on inaccuracies? Is the idol of evolution worth sacraficing truth and accuracy, is it worth dishonest evaluation, While ignoring facts?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Do you still ignore all the evidence that the sun existed more than 6,000 years ago?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

And by what method are you dating? If time as man knows it did not start ticking according to the rising and setting of the sun, then was day four where sun appeared a 24 hour day, or was it a day in light years?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

by what method are you datingDozens...:Distant starlightHelioseismologyLunar retreatRadioactive decayLength of the prehistoric dayNaica megacrystalsNitrogen impurities in natural diamondsPetrified woodRelativistic jetsSeabed plankton layeringSedimentary varvesAmino acid racemizationContinental driftCosmogenic nuclide datingErosionGeomagnetic reversalsIron-manganese nodule growthCoralFission track datingIce layeringLack of DNA in fossilsPermafrostWeathering rindsDendrochronologyHuman Y-chromosomal ancestryOxidizable carbon ratio datingRock varnishThermoluminescence datingetc.----------------------------from here
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

have there been millions of years even after the sun existed?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

So you continue to misinterpret what Ive said, and its because of preconcieved thought. Its limiting you.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

"But what it's assuredly not is you walking through a gate to a cloud city with streets of gold and an authority figure waiting to either give you an eternity of bliss or to send you to be turned into sausage forever and ever."The burden of proof is on you, you claim to know this, prove it.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

No, the burden of proof is on the person afraid of death and punishment. The person not afraid just goes about their business - as I will do this very moment.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Once again, you avoid backing up your claim of knowing assuredly that God does not rule over Heaven and Hell is not eternal punishment of sinners. Your words, claiming you know more than God, with nothing but hot air coming from a wet pile of dust to back up your claim. Prove what you are saying you know "assuredly" is true or admit you don't know what you are talking about. What makes you so sure? How do you know? If you can't explain, I have to conclude you are a liar when you claim to know assuredly that God does not rule over Heaven and Hell is not eternal condemnation of fire for sinners."But what it's assuredly not is you walking through a gate to a cloud city with streets of gold and an authority figure waiting to either give you an eternity of bliss or to send you to be turned into sausage forever and eve"
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Once again, you avoid backing up your claim of knowing assuredly that God does not rule over Heaven and Hell is not eternal punishment of sinners.That is not a provable hypothesis. I think God is purple with big floppy ears. Please prove me wrong. Put your dunce hat and and go sit in the corner. Stupid boy.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

hi monkey .
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Did I give you permission to leave corner. idiot?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Scientists that understand math disagree with creation evolution theories. Adaptatations are adjustments but we never saw a new unrelated animal come out of another.So to make adaptation what it is not, is just covering bs with lies. The new spin everytime they have to redefine words to make them fit. Evolution is a nothing god, that exists in pseudo-scientists imaginations . The Bible has proven itself. And all creation tells of Him.. At least my sky God has evidence I can see right in front of my eyes, and has proven Himself by showing "coincidences" at ridiculously impossible odds.So God shows physically in front of our eyes evidence we can see, and affirms it by showing its at odds that require Him as Creator, Authorship, and Savior... whereas evolution holds impossible odds in their hands with no proof or affirmation of its claim. So I can only believe what I see sir! And evolution shows no proof at all,:just a hypothetical story authenticated by nothing more than creative fiction at far fetched impossible odds! But I have a God who knows all things you seek to know, He made them. And He knows exactly how it was done.And the evidence is piled high to Heaven, and He reveals more everyday. I love those tidbits that show Him in strange ways, eyewitness to His own creation. Example 1 of 1000's, Jesus describes accurately both "Hell" and the "Lake of Fire." These are two different places, in two different locations. This short video shows these two places exactly as Jesus described them. Jesus knows science inside and out!https://youtu.be/ydOOCJAigPc
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

If I said that after death you will become a mini God and have your own solar system to rule over, you might respond that this most assuredly will not happen. It does not follow that you have to prove to me that it won't happen. Especially since you wouldn't care about my screwy ideas.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

You said you think you have the right to exist outside of Hell.I said prove it.Then you went and continue to go ballistic saying stupid things leaving me the impression that the weaves of your basket are coming unraveled.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Are you sure your not smoking weed ?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

So if all things are possible and all things happen, then so did/has the Bible.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Could indeed be true. But I don't personally think so...........................................
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Now you have backed down from claiming to know assuredly that God does nor rule over Heaven and Hell is not eternal punishment for lost sinners, and you have taken the total wishy-washy position of "personally, I don't think so". Personally, I think you don't know what you are talking about and are going by wishful thinking.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Nope, just a dirt nap!

Is anyone navigating your "energy" or does it wander? And when the earth is gone, which seems to be a svience prediction. The general concensus is it will be destroyed one or another. Does your energy then become lost in space? I'd be scared to be energy floating around after death without a caretaker of my soul. Seems like it would be like being lost in the grand canyon. How do you connect with other energy persons, can you find your family? Sounds very scarey and very lost.
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

I don't know, but why do I have to know? It will be whatever it is going to be regardless. And although you find comfort in the Christian Heaven belief is it really any comfort if that turns out to be wrong?
Debate: Is there life after death?
Side: Yes, Heaven awaits!

Is there a difference between life energy and regular energy? When the body is done, does life energy continue to experience things?