awhecmu/canonical-drafter-extract-mathlib huggingface dataset:
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
a b c : ℕ
hb0 : 0 < b
hc : a / b ≤ c
x : ℕ
this : x * b ≤ a → x ≤ c
⊢ x * b ≤ a → 1 ≤ x → x ≤ c
have inl : x * b ≤ a → ∀ (this : ¬x * b ≤ a), 1 ≤ x → x ≤ c
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
a b c : ℕ
hb0 : 0 < b
hc : a / b ≤ c
x : ℕ
this : x * b ≤ a → x ≤ c
inl : x * b ≤ a → ∀ (this : ¬x * b ≤ a), 1 ≤ x → x ≤ c
⊢ x * b ≤ a → 1 ≤ x → x ≤ c
have inr : x * b ≤ a → ∀ (this : x ≤ c), 1 ≤ x → x ≤ c
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp0 : ¬p = 0
x : ℕ
hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ
⊢ x * q / p ≤ p / 2 * q / p
have this : x ≤ p / 2
Tactic: have := le_of_lt_succ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
⊢ HAdd.hAdd (α := ℕ) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ, a * p / q) = p / 2 * (q / 2)
have hswap : #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
Tactic: have hswap :
    #{x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p} =
      #{x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} :=
    card_equiv (Equiv.prodComm _ _)
      (fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by
        simp +contextual only [mem_filter, Prod.swap_prod_mk,
          mem_product, Equiv.prodComm_apply, and_assoc, and_left_comm])
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
⊢ Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
have apply : ∀ (x : ℕ × ℕ) (hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ) (hpq : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q) (hqp : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
  False
Tactic: apply disjoint_filter.2 fun x hx hpq hqp => ?_
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
hpq : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q
hqp : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
⊢ False
have hxp : x.1 < p
Tactic: have hxp : x.1 < p := lt_of_le_of_lt (b := p / 2)
      (by grind) (Nat.div_lt_self hp.1.pos (by decide))
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
hpq : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q
hqp : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
hxp : x.1 < p
⊢ False
have this : Eq (α := ZMod p) (↑x.1 : ZMod p) 0
Tactic: have : (x.1 : ZMod p) = 0 := by
      simpa [hq0] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod p) (le_antisymm hpq hqp)
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
hpq : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q
hqp : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
hxp : x.1 < p
this : Eq (α := ZMod p) (↑x.1 : ZMod p) 0
⊢ False
have this₁ : val (n := p) (↑x.1 : ZMod p) = val (n := p) 0
Tactic: apply_fun ZMod.val at this
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
hpq : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q
hqp : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
hxp : x.1 < p
this : val (n := p) (↑x.1 : ZMod p) = val (n := p) 0
⊢ False
have this₁ : x.1 = 0
Tactic: rw [val_cast_of_lt hxp, val_zero] at this
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
⊢ HAdd.hAdd (α := ℕ) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ, a * p / q) = p / 2 * (q / 2)
have hdisj : Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
  ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
Tactic: have hdisj :
    Disjoint {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q}
      {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} := by
    apply disjoint_filter.2 fun x hx hpq hqp => ?_
    have hxp : x.1 < p := lt_of_le_of_lt (b := p / 2)
      (by grind) (Nat.div_lt_self hp.1.pos (by decide))
    have : (x.1 : ZMod p) = 0 := by
      simpa [hq0] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod p) (le_antisymm hpq hqp)
    apply_fun ZMod.val at this
    rw [val_cast_of_lt hxp, val_zero] at this
    simp only [this, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mem_Ico, one_ne_zero, false_and, mem_product] at hx
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
⊢ x ∈
      {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q} ∪
        {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} ↔
    x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
have this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
Tactic: have := le_total (x.2 * p) (x.1 * q)
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
⊢ x ∈
      {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q} ∪
        {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} ↔
    x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
have simp : ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
  (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
Tactic: simp only [mem_union, mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_product]
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
⊢ ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
have inl : ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
  ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
inl :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
⊢ ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
have inr : ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
  ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
inl :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
⊢ ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
have inl₂ : ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
  ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p →
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
inl :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₂ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p →
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
⊢ ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
have inl₃ : ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
  (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ →
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
inl :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₂ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p →
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₃ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ →
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
⊢ ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
have inr₂ : ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
  ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p →
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
x : ℕ × ℕ
this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
inl :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inr₁ :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₂ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p →
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
inl₃ :
  ∀ (this : x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q),
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ →
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
inr₂ :
  ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
        ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p →
      (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
⊢ ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p ↔
    (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ
have inr₃ : ∀ (this : x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p),
  (1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ →
    ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q ∨
      ((1 ≤ x.1 ∧ x.1 < (p / 2).succ) ∧ 1 ≤ x.2 ∧ x.2 < (q / 2).succ) ∧ x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p
Tactic: tauto
Cleared hypotheses: this
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
⊢ HAdd.hAdd (α := ℕ) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ, a * p / q) = p / 2 * (q / 2)
have hunion : {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q} ∪
    {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} =
  Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
Tactic: have hunion :
      {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q} ∪
        {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} =
      Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ :=
    Finset.ext fun x => by
      have := le_total (x.2 * p) (x.1 * q)
      simp only [mem_union, mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_product]
      tauto
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p q : ℕ
hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hq0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑q : ZMod p) 0
hswap :
  #({x ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ | x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p}) =
    #({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hdisj :
  Disjoint ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q})
    ({x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p})
hunion :
  {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q} ∪
      {x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ | x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p} =
    Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ
⊢ HAdd.hAdd (α := ℕ) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p) (∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ, a * p / q) = p / 2 * (q / 2)
have rw : #(Ico 1 (p / 2).succ) * #(Ico 1 (q / 2).succ) = p / 2 * (q / 2)
Tactic: rw [sum_Ico_eq_card_lt, sum_Ico_eq_card_lt, hswap, ← card_union_of_disjoint hdisj, hunion,
    card_product]
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (hypothesis)
Goal:
p : ℕ
inst : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hp : p ≠ 2
a : ℕ
ha1 : a % 2 = 1
ha0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑a : ZMod p) 0
⊢ legendreSym p (↑a : ℤ) = HPow.hPow (α := ℤ) (β := ℕ) (-1) (∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, x * a / p)
have hp' : Fact (p % 2 = 1)
Tactic: haveI hp' : Fact (p % 2 = 1) := ⟨(Nat.Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two Fact.out).mpr hp⟩
-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.GaussEisensteinLemmas (goal)
Goal:
p : ℕ
inst : Fact (Nat.Prime p)
hp : p ≠ 2
a : ℕ
ha1 : a % 2 = 1
ha0 : Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑a : ZMod p) 0
hp' : Fact (p % 2 = 1)
⊢ Ne (α := ZMod p) (↑(↑a : ℤ) : ZMod p) 0
have norm_cast : ¬Eq (α := ZMod p) (↑a : ZMod p) 0
Tactic: norm_cast