-- Lean 4 proof step from Mathlib.RingTheory.TotallySplit (goal)
Goal:
R S : Type u
inst : CommRing R
inst_1 : CommRing S
inst_2 : Algebra R S
inst_3 : Etale R S
inst_4 : Module.Finite R S
n : ℕ
hn : Eq (α := (p : PrimeSpectrum R) → ℕ) (Module.rankAtStalk S) (↑n : (p : PrimeSpectrum R) → ℕ)
⊢ ∃ (T : Type u) (x : CommRing T) (x_1 : Algebra R T) (_ : Module.FaithfullyFlat R T) (_ : Module.Finite R T) (_ :
    Etale R T), IsFiniteSplit T (T ⊗[R] S)
have zero : ∀ {R S : Type u} [inst : CommRing R] [inst_5 : CommRing S] [inst_6 : Algebra R S] [Etale R S] [Module.Finite R S]
  (hn : Eq (α := (p : PrimeSpectrum R) → ℕ) (Module.rankAtStalk S) (↑0 : (p : PrimeSpectrum R) → ℕ)),
  ∃ (T : Type u) (x : CommRing T) (x_1 : Algebra R T) (_ : Module.FaithfullyFlat R T) (_ : Module.Finite R T) (_ :
    Etale R T), IsFiniteSplit T (T ⊗[R] S)
Tactic: induction n generalizing R S with
  | zero =>
    use R, inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance
    let e : R ⊗[R] S ≃ₐ[R] S := TensorProduct.lid R S
    have : IsFiniteSplit R S := by
      rw [Nat.cast_zero, Module.rankAtStalk_eq_zero_iff_subsingleton] at hn
      exact of_subsingleton_top
    apply IsFiniteSplit.of_algEquiv e.symm
  | succ n ih =>
    cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
    · use R, inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance
      have : IsFiniteSplit R S := .of_subsingleton
      exact .of_algEquiv (TensorProduct.lid R S).symm
    have : Nontrivial S := by
      apply Module.nontrivial_of_rankAtStalk_pos (R := R)
      simp [hn]
    /- Because `S` is unramified over `R`, there exists an `S`-algebra `U` such that
    `S ⊗[R] S ≃ₐ[S] S × U`. -/
    obtain ⟨U, _, _, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Algebra.FormallyUnramified.exists_algEquiv_prod R S
    algebraize [RingHom.snd S U]
    have : IsScalarTower S (S × U) U := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
    have : Etale S U := by
      have : Etale S (S × U) := Etale.of_equiv e
      exact .comp S (S × U) U
    have : Module.Finite S U := by
      have : Module.Finite S (S × U) := Module.Finite.equiv e.toLinearEquiv
      have : Module.Finite (S × U) U :=
        Module.Finite.of_surjective (Algebra.linearMap (S × U) U) (RingHom.snd S U).surjective
      exact Module.Finite.trans (S × U) _
    have (p : PrimeSpectrum S) : Module.rankAtStalk (R := S) (S × U) p = n + 1 := by
      simp [Module.rankAtStalk_eq_of_equiv e.symm.toLinearEquiv, Module.rankAtStalk_baseChange, hn]
    simp_rw [Module.rankAtStalk_prod , Module.rankAtStalk_self, Pi.add_apply, Pi.one_apply] at this
    /- Since the `S`-rank of `S × U = S ⊗[R] S` is `n + 1`, the `S`-rank of `U` is `n`,
    so we may apply the induction hypothesis on `U`. -/
    have : Module.rankAtStalk (R := S) U = n := by
      ext p
      simp only [Pi.natCast_def, Nat.cast_id]
      grind
    /- We obtain a finite étale, faithfully flat `S`-algebra `V` such that `V ⊗[S] U` is finite
    split. We claim that `V` viewed as an `R`-algebra works. -/
    obtain ⟨V, _, _, _, _, _, hV⟩ := ih this
    obtain ⟨n, ⟨f⟩⟩ := hV.nonempty_algEquiv_fun
    algebraize [(algebraMap S V).comp (algebraMap R S)]
    let e : V ⊗[R] S ≃ₐ[V] Unit ⊕ Fin n → V :=
      (Algebra.TensorProduct.cancelBaseChange R S V V S).symm.trans <|
        (TensorProduct.congr AlgEquiv.refl e).trans <|
        (TensorProduct.prodRight S V V S U).trans <|
        (AlgEquiv.prodCongr (TensorProduct.rid S V V) f).trans <|
        (AlgEquiv.prodCongr (AlgEquiv.funUnique _ _ _).symm AlgEquiv.refl).trans
        (AlgEquiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow Unit (Fin n) V V).symm
    refine ⟨V, inferInstance, inferInstance, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
    · have : Module.FaithfullyFlat R S := by
        apply Module.FaithfullyFlat.of_comap_surjective
        rw [← PrimeSpectrum.rankAtStalk_pos_iff_comap_surjective]
        intro p
        simp [hn]
      exact Module.FaithfullyFlat.trans R S V
    · exact Module.Finite.trans S V
    · exact Algebra.Etale.comp R S V
    · exact .of_algEquiv e.symm
Cleared hypotheses: R, S, inst, inst_1, inst_2, inst_3, inst_4, n, hn