Topic: We should limit executive compensation
if executive compensation is too high this makes the gap between rich and poor bigger. this can lead to greater social inequality and potentially civil unrest.
if it should be limited, no ceo should earn 1,000 times more than a regular employee
if someone does a good job, they should be rewarded for it.
if someone has worked hard  to climb the career ladder then they should receive a reward in the form of executive compensation.
if someone has worked hard to become an executive, why shouldn’t they get compensated for their knowledge and expertise?
if someone has worked hard to get where they are in a company then they should be rewarded accordingly.
if we don't limit executive compensation then the gap between rich and poor will just continue to grow.
if we lower executive compensation, then firms will not be able to acquire the top talent to keep their business running well.
in a competitive market companies have to attract the best talent
In a free country any company should be free to choose what compensation they give to anyone including to the executives and this should most definitely not be limited in any way.
in a free market it's not up to governments to set executive compensation. companies should be allowed to pay what they feel is correct.
in a private business executive compensation is whatever they choose to pay
In order to attract the best talent executive compensation should not be limited
In order to hire the best, an organization must provide the best executive compensation.
in order to retain a clear oversight of a business, executive compensation should not be limited to executives who are responsible to run a business
Incentive to perform at the highest levels and attractiveness of position are important factors in maintaining a competitive and successful company in a fast moving and aggressive marketplace.
Income inequality is the highest levels ever with executives earning more in a week then minimum wage earners get in a year, This situation is simply obscene and has to become more realistic.
inequality between the rich and poor leads to the people not being able to have a basic level of life on their income. executive compensation should be more spread out amongst all staff.
is often un earned and would be better spent on employees
it enriches people who don't need the money while hourly workers are starving
it has gotten to where executive compensation is no longer determined by what was done by the individual and they are being paid even if the company is losing money and employees are being fired
it is a culture that it is hard to break the higher your position in a company the more you receive compensation
it is completely unfair that executives a thousand times as much as their employees
it is not fair that they can make so much while the people doing the actual work get the crumbs.
it is ridiculous the amount companies pay to their executives for doing no work, while paying the people who earned them the money only minimum wage.
it is unfair that a ceo should collect compounding wealth while paying their lowest employees enough to just barely clear the poverty line.