Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights
companies invest billions into research, if there are no rights it would dissuade companies from conducting research in the first place.
companies invest millions in research and development if other entities are able to use such ideas without prior investment then it's deeply unfair to the companies who developed the ideas.
companies which have properly researched and developed  new products need to be protected so that research cost can be recouped. without this why research when you can just copy.
competition might be more fair this way.
copyright laws protect artistic creations.
Creating intellectual property is a form of labor and its unfair to allow others to steal and profit from someone else's work
creative property is just as important as physical work and should be protected
creative work is just as important as physical work and authors should be compensated
creators have the right to profit from their ideas.
creators need intellectual property rights so that can get paid for what they create.
development and progress are costly and very high demanding. governments could only protect our efforts by maintaining strict intellectual property rights
each person or institution owns their innovations, therefore they must be the owners of the income they generate and there must be intellectual property rights.
eliminate intellectual property rights could lead to plagiarism at all levels of the arts
enforcing property rights is almost impossible when companies in numerous countries do not enforce the rules very well such as china etc so it is easier just to abolish them
european countries, for their part, tended to consider patent rights as monopolistic.
everybody should be free to use anyone else's intellectual property. otherwise it's not a free country
everything should be free and able to use
filing for intellectual property rights can be very expensive and thus smaller businesses or startups can have difficulty securing them.
for multiple reasons the right of intellectual property should not be abolished since it gives others the participation of making their intellect known and putting it into practice in various activities
having intellectual property rights hinders progress and stops other people developing and improving projects
having intellectual property rights is a deterrent for those that would steal another persons ideas and creations so we must not abolish that.
historically, the united states of america took the lead by offering robust protection to patented inventions and facilitating the diffusion of patent rights markets.
i am contesting  because it is the right of the creator and when you do abolish you limit the creator ability to produce their arts for example and scientists  don't dare to go further in their research
i think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because respect to the author
i think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because the work the author
i think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights for their hard work