Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
traditional family dynamics need the mother to be at home caring for her baby - this is the natural biological set-up, and it has been proven that a child suffers from female absense at a very early age.
we already provide paid time of work for mothers, the country cannot afford to do the same for both parents.
we can not subsidize parents who stay at home because that could encourage corruption and the purchase of votes in exchange for financial aid
we cannot afford to pay people not to work, even when it is for an admirable cause.
we cannot subsidize stay-at-home dads because children  need a motherly figure in their early stage of life
we cannot subsidize stay-at-home dads because there are numerous other issues that need funding like space exploration, health care, clean  water, and feeding the world's hungry
we can't provide aide for everyone due to personal situations and stay at home dads are no exception.
we do not subsidize stay-at-home moms so there's no reason to do it for the dads.
we don't subsidize stay at home moms so we shouldn't dad's either. if that's what they want to do then they can deal with the financial aspects themselves or go back to work.
we don't subsidize stay at home moms so we whouldn't subsidize stay at home dads.
we don't subsidize stay at home moms so why should we subsidize stay at home dads? especially when moms take a more active and nurturing role in raising their children, especially when they're breastfed.
we don't subsidize stay at home mothers so there is not reason to do it for dads. if they dont want to work then that is up to them to come up with a way to provide for their families on their own.
we don't subsidize stay at home mothers so we don't need to be doing it for stay at home dads. if they don't have enough money in the household then they have an obligation to their family to go get a job.
we don't subsidize stay-at-home moms, so subsidizing stay-at-home dads would be incredibly sexist.
we don't subsidize stay-at-home moms, so why would we subsidize stay-at-home dads?
we never subsidized stay at home moms.
we never subsidized stay-at-home mom's why would we do this?
we should absolutely not subsidize stay-at-home dads because it is an awful idea. there are so many people that need help in this world that we should focus on instead of this.
we should because mothers get maternity leave for a long time after the child is born but the dad only receives it for two weeks. but if mother has better income she may want to go back to work first.
we should increase parental leave after child birth, but not fully subsidize stay at home fathers. mothers are more critical during the first year of life and we do not subsidize them either.
we should no subsidize stay-at-home dads because it is no different than a mom staying home.
we should not approve this because stay-at-home dads do not work
we should not because mothers should be with their children after they are born because they need to bond with them or studies show the child will not fully grow mentally.