Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
Stay at home dads provide a valuable service allowing for the equalization of workforce participation and equalizing gender norms, they deserve subsidizing.
stay at home dads provide a valuable service to society, and allow higher paid women to enhance the total family income.
stay at home dads provide a valuable service to their families and potentially future society. this contributions should be subsidized so more can do this
stay at home dads provide vital care for children so should be financially supported.
stay at home dads should be enabled to spend more time with their children and whatever the family decides about who in the family works, the family should be supported the same
stay at home dads should be given support so that they worry less about affording things and spend more time with their children.
stay at home dads should be subsidized because it would create more equal pay for women and give them more opportunities to expand their careers
stay at home dads should be subsidized if they have low incomes as its expensive to provide child care and some cant afford it
stay at home dads should be subsidized so that kids can be taken care of at home by a parent who is responsible for their well being.
stay at home dads should be subsidized to allow more families to have a parent stay at home with the kids rather than have to send them to a day care.
stay at home dads should be subsidized to encourage bonding with the child and toprovide a male rolemodel in the family
stay at home dads should be subsidized to promote stable family make-up and to provide a good rolemodel
Stay at home dads should get something from the government for staying home and helping with the baby,
stay at home dads should not be subsidized as it will be too costly.
stay at home dads should not be subsidized as they are not as necessary as mums for the correct bonding and care of younger children
stay at home mom's are not subsidized so dad's should not be either.
stay at home moms aren’t subsidised so why should dad’s be?
stay at home moms have never been subsidized, why would dads be?
stay at home moms to not get subsidized so neither should stay at home dads.
stay at home should be compensated for the services they provide
stay-aat-home moms have never received a subsidy
stay-at- home dads should not be subsidized because since the dawn of time stay-at- home moms were never subsidized.
stay-at-home dads allow for the partner, to be able to work and allows the father to not only bond but also help provide necessary help in child raising.
stay-at-home dads allow the mother to continue in the workplace, supporting the fight for gender-equality, and gived the father an enhanced bond with his child.
stay-at-home dads allows for the partner to be able to continue employment, much helped if the partner is in a position that provides for the family financially as well as other benefits.
stay-at-home dads are a valuable asset in raising healthy kids and should be subsidized
stay-at-home dads are an integral part of the economy that allow working women to work.