Topic: We should ban naturopathy
naturopathy can help people healing better and can help our society to improve personal care.
naturopathy can help people with allergies to chemical based medication.
naturopathy can ignore the root cause of a symptom and only treat the symptoms.
naturopathy can offer highly individualized treatments which are safer than prescription medicine.
naturopathy can often not be scientifically based or as tested as regular prescription drugs.
naturopathy can prevent people from getting the necessary medications that can keep them alive.
Naturopathy can provide a lot of benefits to people to ease symptoms and make them feel more comfortable.
naturopathy can provide an alternative when mainstream medicine has not worked.
naturopathy can provide information that is presumably more oriented towards naturopathic practices
naturopathy can provide symptomatic relief without side effects
naturopathy can stop people from getting appropriate medical attention
naturopathy causes adherents to eschew proven treatment in favor of snake oil cures which is extremely risky to their health and well-being.
naturopathy causes people to forgo medical treatment that could save their life.
Naturopathy competes with the tried and tested science of the medical establishment and allowing people to be lured in with false promises of healing is unfair and morally unjustifiable.
naturopathy could at best be considered as some kind of placebo.
naturopathy could help those patients with minor ailments and to avoid future complications
naturopathy does no harm in and of itself unlike some treatments that are worse than the disease in traditional western medicine.
naturopathy does not add unnatural things to the body which can make the symptoms worse then the disease.
naturopathy does not always work to cure a sickness and may interact with other substances negatively.
naturopathy does not heal the user, it just alleviate the pain, so it hurts the user in the long run because make them avoid real treatment.
naturopathy does not take advantage of scientific knowledge  so in some cases it could also endanger the health of people that are around them
naturopathy doesn’t have the same adverse side effects of some medicines
naturopathy doesn’t have the same scientific backing as traditional medicine
naturopathy doesn’t have the science to back it that traditional  medicine does and incorrect application could make health outcomes worse
naturopathy doesn’t rely on facts to treat illnesses.
Naturopathy doesn't go through FDA tests for efficacy, so it is usually a sham that doesn't have physiological benefit.
Naturopathy expands the field of medicine, creating more research and discourse.
naturopathy gives someone more control over their own well being since they are more engaged in their health
naturopathy gives the option to cure certain illness without adding side effects from medications.
naturopathy has absolutely no medical benefits at all
naturopathy has aided many types of ailments for centuries in a safe and non chemical method.