Topic: We should subsidize vocational education
making the training free will cause less motivated people to take up valuable training resources
managing your own adult education is valuable training in and of itself
Many of the careers offered at vocational schools provide  essential services to the community.
many people can improve their lives with this education
Many students would be more interested in going to a vocational school to learn a trade than going through traditional primary or secondary school, and more interest is likely to lead to better skill development.
many trade skills are overcrowded as it is, and this would overload the market
more people would learn useful skills and be able to support themselves.
most adults will not finish the program as they have kids or work, and so the money would be a waste.
most vocational jobs will be automated in the future so it is not wise to spend money to subsidize traditional vocational education
No education should be subsidized. Rather, let the free market determine what is worth paying for.
no education system should be subsidized because we could have an indoctrination center and not education centers.
no schooling should get more funding than others
not all high school graduates complete a college degree and some of them get jobs that don't even require a degree, vocational education would really help them get better jobs than otherwise available to them.
not everyone can has the academic requirements for university education. we do still need vocational trades and skills and it makes sense to support people seeking to gain these skills.
not everyone is academically gifted, many people have skills in a vocational field. society  needs people with all skill sets so it is important that people receive a good education in their vocation.
not everyone is cut for higher education so vocational work should be encouraged
not everyone is cut out for a vocational tech job
not everyone is suited for a professional job and having a skill or craft may be more suitable.
not everyone is suited to work in an office. we also need mechanics and truck drivers and hair dressers etc. by subsidizing voed for these jobs we will be able to continue to teach the hands on employees.
Not only should we subsidize vocational education but we should pay people not to go to college for the cost-benefit of college is very low.
nothing bad comes out of learning more.  there should always be options for learning of any age.
only primary education should be available to all and subsidised by tax payers.
our workforce is too focused on white collar jobs and we need hands on dirty work to keep america running
Over time, the technical skills acquired in vocational education become obsolete, leaving an individual without any marketable skills.
people are responsible to pay for their own education
people can find their own way to pay for this education
people should pay for their own vocational education in the way that students pay for their own university studies.
people should pay for vocational education in the same way that they pay for a university education.