Topic: Surrogacy should be banned
having a child by your own genetic material is incredibly important to almost everyone. some people are unable to carry that child to term through no fault of their own. surrogacy is their only way to do this.
having a child that is genetically connected to you is very important to many people
i cannot argue that as it is a good thing
i think it shouldn't be banned because it helps people that can't have a baby in their own body.
i think that the surrogacy shouldn't be banned because is importa the peace in the world
i think that the surrogacy shouldn't be banned for our estabalish of unity and peace
If a surrogate is carrying multiple babies, the potential medical risks may be increased.
if a woman wants to provide the service and somebody is willing to pay for it, it's nobody else's business
if someone wants to carry the child of other people, it is no one else's business
if surrogacy was banned how could people who are barren have kids?
infertile couples or same-sex couples have the same right to have a child as everyone else; surrogacy allows this to happen.
instead of paying someone to birth another child into this world, it would be better to adopt one of many children in need of a good family and home.
it allows couples to have children who can't have them on their own.
it allows women who cannot carry their own children to still have a baby
it can be a great health risk and is not necessary
it can be unhealthy for the carrying mother and cause problems.
it could lead to women being forced to have a child against their will
it exploits poor women who need money & are desperate for that money
it gives infertile couples a chance to have a child
it gives women a chance to be a mother if they themselves can't conceive
it is a legitimate choice for the surrogate and family to make, if the surrogate wants to use their body to carry a baby the state has no right to stop this
it is not illegal to willingly carry and give birth to a  child for someone else
it is unfair on the child who can be left without parents if they decide against adopting it.
it makes problems between the marriage because the man has a connection to the birth mother
it maybe the only opportunity for those who are unable to have children by any other means.
it often leads to the exploitation of women
it should be banned because i don't think we should be paying a person to carry someone else's baby.
it should be banned because there is the possibly the birth mother will want to keep the child and makes all kinds of conflicts with the couple
it should be banned, it can cause the surrogate to feel depressed in the long run.
it should not be banned, the world is already overcrowded and there are many children who need to be adopted
it shouldnt be banned because everyone deserves a chance to have a child and if they are willing to pay so much money for one then they must really want to love it.
it's a woman's right to exercise bodily autonomy and use their body to gift a family a child that is unable to have one otherwise
knowing who the surrogate is provides better information than in an adoption where you don't know any background