Topic: We should limit judicial activism
we should support judicial activism because no law can fit 100 percent of the situations.
we shouldn't because everyone has the right to free speech and a judge has had years of training so if they think someone is guilty then they usually are.
we shouldn't limit judicial activism because it can help blur the lines between right and wrong with the law isn't clear
we shouldn't limit judicial activism because it may not be fair
we shouldn't limit judicial activism because this is an opportunity for democracy to work. many of the laws treat people unfairly and this type of activism can change politics positively.
what constitutes judicial activism is subjective; a judges issuing unpopulars check on another branch of government are just doing their jobs.
when a ruling is made, even when personal option is involved, it is for good reason.
when judicial activism is exercised, it is often done for solely personal and selfish reasons, like one that might be political or one where a judge has received compensation for his judgment
you cannot decide what a jury decides even if it is not based on the laws.