Topic: Entrapment should be legalized
if the police can't convict without entrapment, then they don't have a strong enough case and using tactics like entrapment sets the police up for a bad relationship with the public they serve.
if used to catch people where insufficient evidence exists it should be allowed
if you follow the law you gave nothing to worry about, so yes, it should be legalized to catch law breakers.
In order for laws to be meaningful, they must be objective and concrete, but entrapment laws are incredibly vague meaning that the way they are constructed is principally and pragmatically bad for the criminal justice system.
In the status quo, because the legal definition of entrapment is so broad, it is often used to get people out of punishment even when they otherwise would have committed the crime.
innocent lives can be destroyed due to a singular moment of weakness or making a bad decision and entrapment can lead to innocent people being caught
it can cause people to act in ways that they would not normally act and should not be legal.
it can help to get certain information out of people. it can be easy to twist their words and catch them in a lie.
it helps to catch more criminals and it should be legal.
It is a process for ensuring the person we are suspicious of is the real culprit. So it should be legalized
it is a simplified method of finding people who's criminal bahaviour may otherwise often fly under the radar for a very long time.
it is a viable option to catch some criminals
it is a waste of the government's time and resources to prosecute crimes that would not have occurred without its encouragement.
it is an illegal means by police to charge enemies
it is an unfair practice which works by falsely misleading someone.
it is immoral to set someone up like this to prosecute them
it is not fair to put someone into a situation to commit an act they might not take on their own without a push in that direction.  it is setting someone up to fail.
it is not right to provide the opportunity for someone to commit a crime
It is preferable to legalize entrapment and allow for random tests of civilians obeying the law than to have over-policing and community monitoring which uses more resources and causes more tension with the community.
it isn’t right to force people to commit another crime just to charge them  so it shouldn’t be legal.
it isn't really possible to entrap someone who hasn't already decided to commit a crime
it makes some people do things they usually would not do and that isn't right
it might lead to innocent people who couldn't resist temptation being prosecuted and sentenced.
it offers someone who hasn't decided to commit a crime an opportunity to commit one
it should be allowed to help gain evidence
it should be legal so that more crimials can be caught and pay for their crimes
it should be legal so that police can get all the drug dealers off the streets
it should not be legal because it makes some people commit a crime that they normally would not commit
it will take more criminals & those who wish to commit crimes off the street
it would enable policeman to catch more criminals and keep the streets safe