Topic: We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research
like many other advances in science the government should not have to subsidize the research.  if the benefits are there the private sector will find a way to get results.
many citizens are morally opposed to using embryonic stem cells and using their tax dollars to fund it would be immoral.
many look at this type of research as experimental.
many people feel it is unethical based on their definition on the beginning of life
many religions believe that  embryonic stem cell research is playing god and is offensive to their beliefs.
no use of embryonic stem cell research should be supported by the government as it devalues human life by the harvesting of embryonic stem cells.
no, we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because the topic is very controversial and using money from taxpayers to subsidize something they find unethical is wrong.
of all the different stem cells, embryonic have the most promise for scientific research.
particular religions find that embryonic stem cell research is contrary to their morals so it should not be allowed.
people from religious communities should not have to depend on medical treatment derived against their own system of morality
people should not be forced to finance something that is so controversial
potential life is potential life, you are destroying countless lives at conception by conducting this research
providing more funding from goverment to speed up embryonic stem cell research can only be for the benefit of the public's health.
research could develop a cure for diseases.
research is needed to save babies and children and this is the best way to do that
research with stem cells could open a pandora's box that destroys the human race
science has always progressed.  if stem cell research can help cure even one human it is worth the cost. no one knows what this research can help others in the future.
science should have no limits and further discoveries and tinkering will only better and benefit humanity.
scientists can use stem cells from other sources. while not as ideal, they would be less controversial.
should subsidize embryonic stem cell research for best envelope of country and human
since it's been discovered that you can derive stem cells from adults and other means, morally questionable embryonic stem cell research is unnecessary.
some religions do not believe in this sort of research.
some religions object to the use of stem cells
some religious groups find that stem cell research is unethical.
some say embryonic stem cell research is not moral.
stem cell research can be a path to finding cures to many diseases
stem cell research can help find cures to lots of diseases
stem cell research can help to cure a wide variety of diseases
stem cell research could benefit us all by helping to find cures for diseases etc.
stem cell research could hold the key to curing a myriad of diseases which currently plague us.  imagine being able to cure alzheimer's or cancer.  the solution could lie in stem cell research.
stem cell research goes against the values of various religious groups and therefore should not be subsidized.