Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
encouraging dads to play a more active role in family life can only be a good thing for society.
Even in today's world pay inequality is a fact and this means that dad's cannot afford to stay at home, a subsidy is essential to allow dads the same opportunity as mums.
fathers can be an important role model for their children
fathers miss out on crucial milestones and developments in their children's lives in an attempt to be the bread winner for their families
fathers need to be encouraged to take care of their children as much as mothers do
fathers should have equal treatment and subsidizing them will encourage them to take care of their children
fathers should pay their way in society the same as everybody else
for some families a mother needs to go to work, so we should subsidize stay at home dads for the benefit of the children in those situations.
gender should not be a consideration in subsidizing parental leave.
governments has to subsidize stay-at-home dads to help them survive while they taking care of their children. simple is that.
having a child is a choice. why should we subsidize people that chose to have a child they cannot afford?
having a family should be something planned, you can not expect to be paid for having children, both parents should be active participants in the development of society instead of being a burden.
having a father around can help a child's development
housework is equal to or even stronger than other jobs on the street and is not paid that is the worst
i am in agreement because our parents were aware of their children from the moment they were born.
i think that we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads in some ocasions
I think this may encourage more Dad's to take on childcare thus giving the child better care than being left with a Nanny or Au Pair.
i thnink that we should subsidize stay-at-home dads only incapcity
if a child is raised at home by their father then it is better than being farmed out to childcare, we should subsidise this in the interests of the child.
if a dad wants to stay home he needs to make sure he can afford to do so or refrain from having children.
if a father chooses to stay home, the mother should have to be employeed to support the family's choice.
if a father wants to stay home, he can, but we can't subsidize stay-at-home dads, there is no need in a modern society that has other solutions like kindergartens to help with children's needs
if a man decides to stay home for whatever reason they should be supported
if dads are subsidized  to stay at home then they will not be out at work making money and paying taxes.
If men make the decision to stay at home they should pay for this themselves
if parents can't afford for one to stay at home, they need to pay for childcare, not receive government help
If people have children and want to stay at home with them then it is their own responsibility to ensure that they can afford to do so and not rely on working people to subsidize them
if somebody wants a kids they should be ready to able to subsidize their self and kids too without government help.