Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads so that they can have the same opportunity to bond with their child as the mother.
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads so that they can share in the first few crucial weeks of bonding with their child and family.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads so they can enjoy and spend time with their children and build great bonds that may not happen otherwise
we should subsidize the fathers as they tend to be the majority bread winner in most families
we should support all families no matter which parent is working
We shouldn't be spending tax dollars to help with in home care for dads or anybody.  They had the child and it's their responsibility to financially care for that child.   Not the government.
we shouldn't because the child might not get a chance to bond with their mother at the most important stage of their lives
we shouldn't privilege fathers over mothers when it comes to staying at home with kids.
we shouldnt subsidize stay at home dads its their choice to have children
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads as it's their choice to have children and not work
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads because stay at home moms aren't subsidized
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads because stay at home moms does get subsidized
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads when the man is young
weather it's a man or woman a society should give help to those who need it
when dads don't work outside the home there is less income coming in to support the family. therefore we should subsidize them in order for families to have the necessities they need.
When dads stay at home, they are being supported by a working mom who gets paid less than men, so the father should be subsidized to make up the difference.
when dads stay home it lowers the income of the family and they should be subsized to help maintain the home.
while being a stay-at-home parent is not an easy thing to do, it is also not necessary. if more money is needed, they should get a paying job and not rely on tax-payers' money.
Whilst it is great that more dads stay at home to raise kids, it is basically a personal choice and does not need subsidizing.
who can afford to pay both for mom and dad parental leave? companies will go broke.
why should a stay-at-home dad be compensated for doing his job of helping raising his kid?
why should dad’s be subsidised when moms aren’t?
why should my taxes pay for others to stay at home
why should we pay a man when we don't pay a woman?
why should we subsidize people for doing something they should be doing anyway, like taking care of their kids?
Why subsidize stay at home dads when  many of them get something from their employer for taking time off to care for a newborn
with more and more women being promoted to high paying positions, dads are more often becoming the caregivers for young families.
woman have not been subsidized and they have done quite well without it.
women are often being pressured into giving up their career in order to stay home with children - we should be encouraging fathers to do this as well.