Topic: We should subsidize journalism
They are so many ways to get information nowadays that journalism is becoming irrelevant. A person can get information from his family member living abroad or anywhere.
they get paid enough & do not need to be subsidized
this would encourage bright new journalists into the profession
this would encourage people into journalism
this would only hurt the field as a whole.
this would provide  more accurate and less biased opinions.
today's journalism has caused the polarization of our citizens
Too many journalists sensationalize the news and outright lie to their audience; they are not to be trusted.
traditional press quality is declining and subsidizing would increase opinion and quality
unchecked journalism can lead to biases, paid content, and sow seeds of distrust in the media.
we already are in high enough debt, we don't need to make it worse be subsidizing pointless things.
we don't subsidize other fields so why should we subsidize journalism
we need high quality journalism to combat corruption in our nation
We need journalists to help keep the government in check and bring to light abuses of power.
we need journalists to keep us informed as to what is going on in the world
we need to make sure that journalism keeps attracting the best people
we need to subsidize journalism so that it continues to draw in good people
we ought to subsidize journalism to get young people interested in the field
we should  fund journalism to serve the public interest.
we should ban journalism because journalists like to lie.
we should because it would make the journalist more inclined to do a better job
we should because people need to be informed and it will be important to find this so it will be more accurate.
we should not because then more journalists will pop up and could spread false information.
we should not have to support journalism so that they came make more money
we should not interfere with the free market, which subsidizing does. it throws the market out of balance and does not represent supply and demand when something is subsidized.
we should not subsidize journalism and keep opinions out of it.
we should not subsidize journalism as they are private companies and can raise tons of money without our fear of bad reporting because their company would tank if they reported bad news.
we should not subsidize journalism as they can produce tons of money through their advertising that can fully support the profession and the money used in other more critical areas of need.
we should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the journalists spread false news
we should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the things they say are false news
we should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the time they spread false information
we should not subsidize journalism because it acts to protect poorly run and inefficent media companies from normal market forces
we should not subsidize journalism because it is a poor use of public money when things like healthcare and education are short of funding