Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons
it is not possible that we have to sleep thinking that someone can at some point finish the planet
It matters not how unlikely the event of nuclear conflict is, because the danger it presents is grave. In order to survive as a society, we must get rid of nuclear weapons.
it only needs one lunatic in charge of setting off the nuclear weapon to obliterate the entire world so surely if you take these weapons out of the equation, the world must be a safer place.
it only takes one person in power to  start a nuclear war which could kill us all. we should take away this power.
It only takes one rogue state launching a nuclear attack for an international nuclear exchange to begin, annihilating all human life on earth.
it would be a better world if it contained no nuclear weapons, maybe peace would finally be in our reach
it would be impossible to abolish the world's nuclear weapons because some countries would absolutely refuse to do so
It would be impossible to be sure that all nuclear weapons would be destroyed or dismantled.
it would make everyone safer if nuclear weapons did not exist.
it would require a sea change in a dizzying array of defense matters, ranging from core defense policies to highly technical weapons programs
It's a difficult challenge, but do we have a choice? Nuclear weapons will end civilization if we don't at least limit them.
it's impossible to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of every  country.   having access to them will keep enemy countries afraid to attack you because of these weapons you possess.
just having the ability to use a nuclear weapon often can be a deterrent.
keeping nuclear weapons make sure that our country is protected
Maintaining nuclear weapons is incredibly costly to nations who have them, and abolishing nuclear weapons would allow us to put that money towards more productive causes, such as infrastructure or welfare.
Mutually assured destruction created by nuclear weapons is good because it provides an incentive to avoid and de-escalate conflicts for fear of nuclear weapons.
mutually assured destruction is a crucial method of preventing actual conflict and disaster
Nations should always act in their own best interests, and having Nuclear weapons guarantees a modicum of security and clout on the international stage.
no country should have them and then we would all be safe from a threat of nuclear war.
No individual politician or government should be trusted with control over nuclear weapons, so we must abolish them so as to never give anyone this responsibility.
no one wins with nuclear weapons. if two or more countries nuked each other parts of, if not all of, the entire world is just gone. it destroys everything and solves nothing.
Not every nation has nuclear weapons and are at risk of attack.
nothing good comes from nuclear weapons. humans need to get along and work together for a better world instead of finding new ways to destroy the enemy.
Nuclear  weapons are an important tool for countries to have as they negotiate because they are a show of power.