Topic: We should adopt a multi-party system
promotes debate and healthy competition
Single issue parties are more likely to get their campaign promises done and are only possible in a multiparty system.
so much competition could result in increasingly populist competitors
some countries flourish under other types of government, such as a monarchy, and there is no reason to interfere with that.
sometimes less of a choice is better.  those with more experience win elections in a two part system.
sometimes too many choices make it harder to decide, with just two parties to pick from it is easier to decide on the best one
Sometimes, no single party is able to get a clear majority. This leads to hung parliaments.
that there are only two political groups represents a threat because it leaves out important opinions of other groups
the current  system is broken and doesn't work. neither side can work together so having more options would force politicians to come together and do what's best for the people because no side would be majority
the current system works and should not be changed
the current two-party system already gives us the best candidate possible, and it is a lot easier to moderate debates with only two parties to worry about.
The existence of many political parties enables more people to find parties that represent their views and leads to greater political activism.
the interests of a two party system are very limited and we need to expand with more parties to cater to more views
The issues in multi-party systems are numerous and more difficult to understand.
the more ideas we have being brought to the table the better we can find a common ground to compromise and having multi-party system allows for the most ideas to be represented.
the multiparty system generates some democratic deficits, it is not about how many parties there are, but the relationship between representatives and represented
the multi-party system is essential and ensures that minority parties have a say
The multiparty system is less biased by things like charisma or attractiveness as voters vote for ideas and parties and not individual politicians.
The multiparty system is less democratic as citizens don't vote for who will govern them, they just vote for party.
the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics
the multi-party system works and ensures that everybody has their say
the political groups already formed represent the opinion of the population and it is unnecessary more of these
the problem with multi-party systems is that it brings too many people to the bargaining people and no one ends up getting what they want
the system is fine how it is and doesn't need changed
the two party system does not give us enough choices.
the two party system is barely functional so we don't need to confuse things even more by throwing a bunch of new parties into the mix. it will be a mess.
the two party system is messy enough and diluting votes across even more parties will exponentially increase fraud
the two party system is not enough for citizens these days and they need more options to fit their political agendas