Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons
we shouldn't fight for the absolution of nuclear weapons because the smaller countries that have nuclear weapons use them as leverage so that they don't get attacked. without it, they would get bullied.
we shouldn't fight to get rid of nuclear weapons. they provide a deterrent to serious conflict because even the smaller countries who have nuclear weapons pose a threat
we will never be able to control what other countries do or have and for that reason we must not abolish nuclear weapons because that would put us as risk.
weapons of mass destruction has no place in warfare that's why we should abolish nuclear weapons.
When nuclear weapons exist in one place, they are always at risk of proliferating to the most dangerous of regimes.
when we demand other countries do not have nuclear weapons it is illegitimate and hypocritical to continue having our own
while it's dangerous, it is an important field to study for scientific purposes.
With the right safety precautions in place, nuclear weapons offer premium protection with little risk.
Without nuclear weapon, the World War III would have surely broken out.
Without nuclear weapons governments would use chemical and biological weapons which are worse due to level of cruelty and potential for transmission.
Without the guaranteed peace caused by nuclear weapons, countries are more likely to turn to violence and squabbling.