Topic: We should ban naturopathy
naturopathy is not proven and is unknown
naturopathy is not proven or tested.
naturopathy is not real medicine so we should ban it's use.
naturopathy is not regulated and alternative health treatments can cause more harm due to the lack of scitific research and regulations.
naturopathy is not scientifically proven and can cause a person to not treat an illness that has an approved treatment, causing a sickness to get worse resulting in further injury or death.
naturopathy is perfectly safe for all conditions.
naturopathy is pseudoscience and adherents may be harmed because they will eschew conventional medicine.
naturopathy is pseudoscience, there is no real evidence that it helps anyone
naturopathy is pseudoscientific practice that is untested and unstandardized. anyone can practice it, which leads to patients being put in a vulnerable situation by unqualified practitioners.
naturopathy is quackery and charlatanism
naturopathy is rarely dangerous by itself
naturopathy is safer and less expensive than prescription medications.
naturopathy is safer than man made medicines that have horrible side effects.
naturopathy is safer than prescription medicines that usually cause more added side effects.
naturopathy is simply a natural alternative to typical medicine, and in some cases, is better tolerated than conventional medicine.
naturopathy is simply an alternate treatment, for those who might not respond well to conventional therapies.
naturopathy is something that should be banned because it basically consists of natural healing which doesn't work well, or heal everyone.
naturopathy is the one alternative-to-medicine practice that seems to genuinely confuse the public
naturopathy is the only answer for some people.
naturopathy is the only solution for some
naturopathy is unpredicatble and unknown
naturopathy is unproven and could stop people seeking medical help
naturopathy is unproven in treating diseases and can prevent proper treatment resulting while not eliminating an illness resulting in more harm.
naturopathy is unproven scientfically, and could have adverse medical affects.
naturopathy is unproven, junk science.
naturopathy is unregulated and there is no proof that it is beneficial or safe.
Naturopathy is used more in particular cultures, which ought to be respected.
Naturopathy is usually used in conjunction with conventional medical treatments to provide a more holistic approach that creates better overall health for the individual.
naturopathy is very dangerous for the most vulnerable people, like children and cancer patients. people use ineffective treatments and forgo proven cures, such as antibiotics or chemo, often resulting in death.
naturopathy is, at it's root, natural, which can only be healthy for us.
naturopathy isn't tested and can cause more problems health wise than it fixes
naturopathy isn't thoroughly tested by the fda and may pose significant health risks if not utilized properly
naturopathy keeps people from seeking necessary medical care because they think they can heal themselves naturally.
naturopathy lets any person act like they are an doctor which is very misleading.