Topic: We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is supported just fine with private donations and has continued to function without the need for a subsidy.
wikipedia is the greatest unbias source of information we have. it encourages learning and is necessary especially for low income individuals. we must continue to support it.
wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission.
wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia in the world and we must ensure its proper functioning
wikipedia is the most important and largest source of information on the internet and we must support it
wikipedia is the most incredible resource of open source information, by subsidizing it we can ensure it is policed better
wikipedia is the only free source of information with references that's guaranteed to be accurate. it's needed, especially for those who can't afford anything else.
wikipedia is the search page most used by students and is an updated tool that helps knowledge and should be subsidized to ensure its proper functioning
wikipedia is the world's free knowledge base.it should be cherished, supported and improved.
Wikipedia is the world's largest online repository of knowledge and should be supported by public dollars to continue its mission.
wikipedia is too often edited by unreliable contributors and therefore is not quality enough to consider funding.
wikipedia is too vulnerable to manipulation to be considered a trusted source.
wikipedia is useful in helping people of all ages learn about various topics..
wikipedia is valuable knowledge resource that should not be allowed to go under due to lack of resources and so should be subsidized
wikipedia is very informative and keeps up to date on  millions of topics.
wikipedia makes enough money on its own
wikipedia makes enough money on it's own
wikipedia needs no additional funding, the revenue it gains from donations is sufficient to keep it afloat
wikipedia needs to be publicly funded to keep it honest
wikipedia needs to be subsidized because it is an important online research tool used by many.
wikipedia needs to remain as is.  if the government gets involved with finances, we're looking at the possibility of a sway of information.
wikipedia offers a quick and easy way of finding information that a person is looking for and subsidizing it would give them more funds for research.
wikipedia offers a vast database that uses various sources to insure accurate information and subsidization would allow for more accuracies to raise the factual level of info on wikipedia.
wikipedia offers so much valuable information. it gives you immediate updates on many topics.
wikipedia often contains false information and so can lead to people believing that have no validity in reality.
wikipedia often provides biased, inaccurate information due to lax editing policies and procedures.
wikipedia opened under its own steam and maintains itself with voluntary contributions so there is no need to subsidize it.