Topic: We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia has done just fine on it's own with private funding. if you start subsidizing it then they will be less likely to publish negative information about the source of their money.
Wikipedia has millions of visitors every day. If these individuals were charged a minimal fee, Wikipedia would never need government subsidization.
wikipedia has no control in the publications. the information provided may be wrong. the unverified information should not be subsidized
wikipedia has no source of funding and subsidizing it will let it keep providing information
wikipedia has other ways to maintain itself
wikipedia has proven itself as useful is not more so than the dictionary, it deserves help with funding.
wikipedia has proven itself worthy of being subsidized as its maintained usefulness for many years now.  in fact it's as useful, if not more so, than a regular dictionary is.
wikipedia has resources and ads and we do not need to subsidize them.
wikipedia has the potential to be the greatest source of freely accessible information, a subsidy could help to reach this goal whereas currently the funding is becoming a bigger threat to its existence
wikipedia helps a lot of people and should be subsidized.
wikipedia helps people of all ages learn about various topics
wikipedia information usually not accurately checked, so we don't have to subsidize it.
wikipedia is a business that can make their own money through advertising.
wikipedia is a cultural phenomena that is relied upon by millions of people when researching data. if it were subsidized it could be reviewed and standardized more and benefit more people.
wikipedia is a fairly accurate way to get facts about nearly any topic and we should support that.
wikipedia is a free user-created website and should stay that way
wikipedia is a go to for many people and it should be kept well funded.
wikipedia is a good source of information
wikipedia is a good source of information for any topic and should be compensated.
wikipedia is a good source of information on many topics that are interest to people
wikipedia is a great form of information and subsidising it would enable more information to be entered and corrected.
wikipedia is a great of source for information, so it needs to subsidized so that whoever works there can work freely without worrying about looking for advertisers and sponsors..
wikipedia is a great resource to find out the basics about topics and if we subsidized it, it would allow for to become more accurate and a better resource.
wikipedia is a great source of information and encourages learning.
wikipedia is a great source of information and should be subsidised.
wikipedia is a great source of knowledge.  it is a internet form of the encyclopedia.  but it takes money to run it and there are no ads.  to continue this service all should help by subsidizing it..
wikipedia is a great tool for the world.   they provide every bit of information people need.   the government should help with their bills so we can always be sure we don't lose them.
wikipedia is a great way for people to get free information.