Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
if someone chooses to stay at home he is doing it knowing that there will be no income
if stay at home dad’s were subsidised then more children would get to spend time with their dad’s so it would be better for family life.
if stay-at-home dads are subsidized there will be less men in the workplace and there will be less taxes paid.
if subsidizing stay at home dads would help a family better care for their children and stay off public assistance, then i think it's a great idea.
if the dad needs a subsidy to be able to stay home then maybe he shouldn't be staying home and instead get a good job
if the wife is the breadwinner then it's only fair we support fathers who chose to raise their children.
if we subsidize stay-at-home dads then they'll get women pregnant just to stay at home
if you have children, you should be responsible enough to raise them without government assistance
in a newly formed family it is vital that both parents can generate money, if they have the blessing of the arrival of a child then the state should subsidize the father who stays at home
in a world where many children lack a male role model this could be a good way to encourage fathers to spend time with their child.
in an era of austerity, the country does not have sufficient funds to subsidise dads to stay at home. there are more urgent issues to consider such as poverty, housing and climate change.
in the interests of broadening the opportunities of males in caring for their families we should subsidize stay-at-home dads.
in the modern age dads have as much a role to play in a family and the rearing of children and should be subsidized as it makes for a more stable family and appropriate role models
in the world where everybody seeking equality, can`t see why we should subsidize stay-at-home mothers and not subsidize stay-at-home dads?
it could help cover the costs that are missing from being at work
it has been proven that very young children develop better in the close company of their mothers - severing this biological bond on the altar of equality is short sighted and damaging.
it has been reported that many stay at home fathers succumb to depression.
it is a great thing when dads want to stay home with their children, but often they are needed as the main income earner so subsidizing them would help greatly.
it is a parents choice to have children and cease employment. if either sex chooses to have children, they should pay for them entirely theirselves.
It is bias to subsidize men and not women. Once again women are receiving lower pay.
it is difficult for dads especially to spend time at home with their children
it is essential that fathers can stay at home to look after children and the state should pay them for doing so
it is important for a father to be able to spend quality time with their children
it is necessary stay-at-home dads benefit them so they can stay
it is not for the state to subsidize stay-at-home dads, they are a burden on society