Topic: We should adopt a multi-party system
a multi-party system could mean that it is more difficult to agree on any answers as  it is more likely that there will not be a majority on issues.
a multi-party system creates chaos.  more is not merrier in this type of case.
a multi-party system enables the people to have more of a say in what happens in their country.
a multi-party system encourages innovation and new ideas.
a multi-party system encourages parties with different political views to work together and discourages polarising adversarial politics
a multi-party system encourages weak and unstable coalition governments that are unable to pursue radical change
a multi-party system ensures that voters have the chance to elect politicians that most closely align with their believes, lessening the chance that they have to compromise on things they feel are important.
a multi-party system is clearly good for democracy. allowing opposing groups to work through their differences and give choice to the population in government elections.
a multi-party system is enshrined in democracy. anyone should have his ideology and choose the party of his choice
a multi-party system is great in that it provides voters with many different candidates with different views and ideas
A multiparty system is less likely to cater to extremists who are now only represented by small extreme parties rather than larger parties.
A multiparty system is less likely to have gridlock because there are more parties that are willing to compromise.
a multiparty system is more representative of the will of the people
A multi-party system is more responsive to a change or shift in public opinion.
a multi-party system is the fairest representation of all political viewpoints, and would increase the electorate's engagement with politics in general.
a multi-party system is the most democratic system available, since it gives recognition to a broader canvas of viewpoints.
a multi-party system lacks stability and costs huge amounts to run as many parties all campaign for their voice to be heard
a multi-party system leads to disorganization and chaos.
a multi-party system leads to too much division and there may never be an overall consensus
a multi-party system leads to unstable goverment and does not reflect the will of the people accurately
a multi-party system lets many views on important topics to be heard
a multi-party system makes it much more difficult to collaborate on ideas.
a multi-party system makes sure more ideas are included.
a multi-party system makes sure that one political party doesn't hold all the power.
a multi-party system maximizes choice which would encourage greater voter participation.
a multi-party system means that more opinions will be heard and people will get a greater choice of who to vote for.
a multi-party system might allow for more and more diverse candidates to come to the forefront of each election.
a multi-party system muddies the waters with too many ideas
a multi-party system never works because at the end of the day each party is out for themselves and don't work in the best interest of the people being represented.