Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights
intellectual property rights should be abolished because one person thinking of a new idea first allows that person to control the rights to that thought for the foreseeable future.
intellectual property rights should be abolished because they hold others back from discovery and creativity
intellectual property rights should be abolished because without them people are able to piggyback ideas which leads to more products and ideas.
intellectual property rights should be abolished since it doesn't allow the sharing of ideas
intellectual property rights should be protected
intellectual property rights should be protected to prevent ideas and inventive thinking from being stolen, used and/or manipulated by others, claim the intellectual property as their own.
intellectual property rights should be protected, as intellectual property is the same as physical property.
intellectual property rights should never be abolished in order to protect the successes of a businesses.
intellectual property rights should not be abolished as they ensure that those who have had an original idea, financed research and development get rewarded for their effort and not have their innovation stolen
intellectual property rights should not be abolished as they provide security and protection to inventors to stop their hard work and financial investment being stolen and losing their just rewards
Intellectual property rights should not be abolished because it infringes on copyright and patent laws if not protected.,
intellectual property rights should not be abolished because the work of an individual or company is their work to own
intellectual property rights should not be legally enforced, because anyone who creates intellectual property has the obligation to share that creation with the world in order to help educate or edify others.
intellectual property rights shouldn’t be abolished because it helps to ensure the originator is reimbursed accurately for their ideas.
intellectual property rights shouldn't be abolished because you won't have to worry about someone stealing your product and trying to pass it off as their own
intellectual property rights slow the advancement of human knowledge and technology considerably, big breakthroughs might not happen if people withhold important information.
intellectual property rights slow the pace of important technological developments by ringfencing data to the detriment of society as a whole.
Intellectual property rights slows down the speed with which people have access to technology, goods and ideas that could transfrom their lives so should be abolished.
intellectual property rights spur innovation and content creation.
intellectual property rights stifle competitive business.
intellectual property rights stifle creativity since all ideas are built upon the ideas of the past.
intellectual property rights stifle further innovation by restricting access to ideas.
intellectual property rights stifle growth and information by stopping the free-flowing of ideas.
intellectual property rights stifle the widespread use of life enhancing technology so we should abolish them.