Topic: We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime would raise taxes which would leave the hardworking with less money in their pockets.
an austerity regime would really hurt those people who could least afford a loss of their benefits.
an austerity regime would save money for the country.
an austerity regime would stabilize our government
an austerity regime would take services from poor people who rely on them.
an austerity regime would theoretically help reduce the national debt because it is very strict as far as budegeting.
an austerity regime would undermine personal liberty, a value we hold to high regard in this country
an austerity regimean austerity regime will reduce demand and output
an austerity region is necessary when government funds are low so savings can be made.
as a last ditch effort the government should be allowed to cut programs and spending to stabilize the economy to prevent failing.
as our national debt continues to climb i think it's important that we adopt an austerity regime.   we need to cut back spending on everything and fix this massive debt.
as we are all part of our society and that we have to support our country and elected government and if the government wen to debt or deficit, we are obligate to help it and to support it.
austere measures are necessary to get the national debt under control.
austere measures are the only way to reduce the national debt.
austerity affects the poor and disabled more than the rich
austerity affects the poorest in society most and the rich do not feel the effects
austerity arguments are usually ideological arguments in disguise. "we can't afford it" is usually code for "we don't want to pay for that."
austerity can be helpful in restructuring a county's debt.
austerity could end up hitting poor people the hardest when they are already struggling.
austerity during times of financial instability ends up hurting people who depend on social programs
austerity forces the poorest sections of the population into greater poverty.
austerity has the biggest effect on those who can least afford it
austerity has, by and large, been a dead-bang loser of a policy
austerity in fiscal policy usually results in spending cuts to those areas of society who need it most.
austerity is a personal choice and should not be imposed
austerity is counter-productive as public expenditure is constrained impacting on business and the wider economy.
austerity is incompatible with the 21st century
austerity is necessary to save money during times of financial instability
austerity is required because it keeps the country from having to borrow as much
austerity is the best way to get the economy back on track
austerity makes times tougher for everyone.
austerity measures are detrimental to businesses which need a free-spending culture to survive.
austerity measures stifle economic development and make the economy worse, not better
austerity measures will help to reduce the governments debt
austerity measures will increase the number of people living in poverty.
austerity normally takes from the poor when welfare benefits are cut. this leads to child poverty and people having to use food banks.