Topic: We should end the use of economic sanctions
economic sanctions are cruel and we should be able to negotiate
economic sanctions are cruel to the people of the country and does nothing to change the action of the leadership.
economic sanctions are dangerous for the people and the country economy towards which they are used against. they can totally destroy the economic and put millions of people into deep poverty
economic sanctions are designed to curb human rights violators and their collaborators
economic sanctions are designed to destroy dictators and violators of human rights
economic sanctions are effective and are a response to other nations that does not use military force.
economic sanctions are effective in causing political and social change or uprising by limiting imports and exports which hurt the people
economic sanctions are effective in certain situations, they do help deter future misbehavior and also help to get the country "back in line"
economic sanctions are far better than using military force
economic sanctions are favoured as they can be a peaceful alternative to military action
Economic sanctions are immoral and hurt the people they are supposed to be protecting.
economic sanctions are ineffective; they don't effect the lives of those in power who will continue to make rules and regulations to suit themselves.
economic sanctions are less destructive than warfare
economic sanctions are necessary  to stop unfair trade.
economic sanctions are needed sometimes to limit trade
economic sanctions are needed to punish countries that don't play by international rules.
economic sanctions are not a viable means to any end. they constrict innovation and efficiency and are of no benefit to any one.
economic sanctions are not effective.
economic sanctions are often a proportional punishment
economic sanctions are often poorly targetted so the poor and less well off often suffer while the ruling classes the sanctions are designed to change the behavior of are able to cope relatively well
economic sanctions are often the only way to force countries to comply with international law.
economic sanctions are one of the most effective ways to motivate unscrupulous leaders to change
economic sanctions are only done as a last resort and to try to bring about a positive outcome
economic sanctions are outdated and create more problems.
economic sanctions are outdated and does not cause any repercussions.
economic sanctions are preferable to the use of military force to get hostile countries to comply with international laws and agreements.
economic sanctions are sometimes necessary for political reasons.
economic sanctions are sometimes the only thing that a leader will respond to
economic sanctions are sometimes the only way to get a despotic nation to adhere to the demands of the world.
economic sanctions are sometimes the only way to get a regime to make meaningful changes.
economic sanctions are the best means for accomplishing the current plan
economic sanctions are the only means by which some countries can be force to act appropriately, ending them would be detrimental