Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons
the abolition of nuclear weapons is a hugely important goal on the path to world peace.
the abolition of nuclear weapons is an urgent humanitarian necessity. any use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic consequences
the abolition of nuclear weapons is needed to secure peace.
the abolition of nuclear weapons is the single most important act to ensure there is no mistake that a mass destruction of people would occur.
the abolition of nuclear weapons means we would have a reduced potential of accidental detonation
the abolition of nuclear weapons would create a power vacuum that coventional warfare would rush to fill, costing countess lives - they are an effective deterent, as has been proven since ww2.
the abolition of nuclear weapons would help keep us safer.
The abolition of nuclear weapons would reintroduce conventional warfare, creating more conflict and millions more deaths each year.
The acquisition of nuclear weapons by dictators and despots makes revolution and social change impossible, creating more dire conditions.
The alternative to nuclear weapons are bio-weapons and chemical weapons, which are more likely to be used, more horrific in their outcomes, and more dangerous as they can be spread person to person.
The choice presented to the human society is simple: either live in constant fear of the other and go down in a spectacular feat of self-destruction, or finally evolve and put an end to nuclear weapons.
The cost of developing nuclear weapons in developing states drains cash from infrastructure, education, and welfare funds which hurts the population as a whole.
The cost of developing nuclear weapons is incredibly high due to material and human capital costs involved in developing unique, incredibly sophisticated technology.
The danger of a nuclear war will remain until weapons of mass destruction cease to exist
the dangers of nuclear weapons are too much of a threat to humanity and should not be under the control of anyone!
the destruction caused by nuclear weapons is far to dangerous to maintain, therefore nuclear weapons should be abolished.
The development of nuclear weapons in developing states has lead to sanctions by the international community, which starves the poorest civilians who likely had no say in the development of weapons.
The heat and radiation released by nuclear detonations against all targets in a massive area make these bombs inherently horrific, violent, and cruel.
the immediate results of a nuclear attack are already devastating, but the lasting effects make it that much more cruel.
the immense destructive power of nuclear weapons means that any rogue state or organization that acquires them and the means to deploy them could bring about the end of the world.
The increase in military spending that would follow abolition of nuclear weapons would far outweigh the cost in keeping them.
The intense damage that nuclear weapons cause not just to the people immediately hit but also the generations following  is morally abhorrent and means we must fight to abolish them.