Topic: We should limit executive compensation
executive compensation has hit astronomical levels, widening the pay gap between worker and executive, this has the potential to lead to disharmony and possible conflict.
executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit
executive compensation helps bring talent in leadership that will grow a  company to be profitable
executive compensation increases costs and decreases benefits that other employees might receive.
executive compensation is a bonus for a job well done.
executive compensation is a farce and just a way for the richer to avoid taxes while paying themselves undeserving amounts of money and awards without a cap.
executive compensation is a good way to award those doing a better than average job without it being part of their pay.
executive compensation is a good way to reward executives for their contributions above and beyond the normal pay scale.
executive compensation is a joke. it's executives rewarding themselves on the backs of shareholders regardless of how well a company performs.
executive compensation is a reward for those who have worked to get to the top of their profession; it would be unfair to limit it.
executive compensation is a way to reward and incentivize the top employees.
executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people.
executive compensation is excessive and undermines the work or lower employees.
executive compensation is needed to provide their luxury lifestyle
executive compensation is not always effective and takes away from the rest of the employees who do most of the strenuous work
executive compensation is not paying for achievement because they are paid even if their companies are losing money
executive compensation is often seen as rewarding director incompetence, is frequently hugely excessive and exacerbates damaging inequality divides between a company's workforce and its board.
executive compensation is one of the mechanisms of governments to cover salaries and benefits
executive compensation is out of control and causing lower workers to be in want
executive compensation is out of control and stifles the earning power of the company's employees.
executive compensation is out of control. it is morally wrong for executives to make so much more than lower level employees who also perform valuable services
executive compensation is ridiculously high. this money should be limited and then the extra be funneled down to the people in the company who do most of the work that earn low wages.
executive compensation is simply part of a modern remuneration package, and just as with basic salaries, and attractive compensation scheme is needed to attract the best talent to an organisation.
executive compensation is tax evasion and should be severely limited
executive compensation is the business of the company itself and is needed to be competitive to attract the best executives to run their company.
executive compensation is too high and the people who do the actual physical work aren't paid enough. some of this money should be paid out to the employees.