Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons
The risk of an accidental missile launch is so large and could have such catastrophic effects that we need to abolish nuclear weapons.
The risk of nuclear war has made great powers more likely to turn to negotiation and cooperation to settle disputes, and abolishing nuclear weapons would make war less costly and more likely.
The security cost of protecting nuclear bombs from theft or espionage requires massive investment which exists as long as nuclear bombs are part of a country's arsenal.
the sole purpose of nuclear weapons is death and destruction so the should be abolished
the stockpiling of nuclear weapons ensures that other countries will not attempt to attack.  the concept of mutual destruction is a great barrier to nuclear war.
the strongest nations need nuclear weapons
The testing of nuclear bombs puts radiation into the atmosphere, the land, and the sea, destroying vulnerable species and reducing the health of all who remain.
The theory of "Mutual Assured Destruction" is viable today as much as it was in the cold war, and the result is relative peace
the threat of mutually assured destruction is the only thing that keeps democracy safe from tin pot dictators, hence we need to keep nuclear weapons.
the threat of nuclear weapons can keep bad actors from doing  great damage
the threat of nuclear weapons can keep some of the more radical governments in check.
the threat of nuclear weapons helps keep other countries from declaring wars.
the threat of nuclear weapons keeps despots and tyrants in check.
the u.s needs nuclear weapons, just having them prevents other countries from attacking us.
the united states, at least, needs nuclear weapons for protection in order to deter other countries from attacking.
the use of nuclear bombs have stopped wars.  even the threat of nuclear weapons being able to destroy countries has led to treaties such as between russia and the usa.   keep the bombs stored.
the use of nuclear weapons is a good tool to guard against mutual destruction.
the use of nuclear weapons would be catastrophic for mankind
The use of nuclear weapons would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.
The use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic consequences for humans, and the effects of radiation would cause suffering and death for many years after the initial explosion.
the use of weapons of mass destruction can not be justified
the use of weapons of such destruction can not be justified
the world can not be at the mercy of a few countries with such power to destroy
there are many environmental concerns to be considered when using nuclear weapons.
there are several mentally unstable world leaders with access to nuclear weapons. we have to be able to protect ourselves against them
there are still dangerous countries that don't possess nuclear weapons and that is what prevents them from attacking a country that has them
There are too many nuclear weapons out there already. It would be impossible to abolish them altogether.
there has got to be a better way to solve conflicts than wiping out civilizations with nuclear weapons.