Topic: We should subsidize Wikipedia
we should subsidize wikipedia since they are important and help us learn new information this is a vital resource that needs to be around.
we should subsidize wikipedia so that it can hire good people that keep improving the site and the information it provides
we should subsidize wikipedia so they can better serve and cover many area not just for the united states for example but also for other part of the world
we should subsidize wikipedia so they can continue to build a magnificent database of information.
We should subsidize Wikipedia to ensure that it is properly maintained and impartial as it is such a valuable global resource.
we shouldn't because normal people contribute and that information could be misleading or false.
we shouldn't because the information that is added can be added by anyone and it could spread false information around.
we shouldn't give money to a site where anyone can edit articles to give false information.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because have many activities an win much money in advertising
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because it's not important, maybe people want to remain anonymous and with wikipedia that is not possible
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because pages on wikipedia is user created and isn't always accurate
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because the information on it isn't trustworthy because it is user created and can be edited by anyone.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because there is a lot of untrustworthy information especially on less popular pages
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia for the resources and money generated
we think wikipedia is important but should not be subsidized. wikipedia asks for funding every year from it's users and that is fine. the government has more important things to subsidize.
why should our tax dollars go to a website? if they didn't exist there's many other websites to find information on virtually any topic.   just google the question and you are there.
why subsidize something that is working fine? we need to subsidize crucial services that save lives before looking at funding wikipedia
wikedia gets more than enough money already from charitable donations
wikipedia allows people to say whatever they want on a topic and does not have to be true or provable.
Wikipedia already has more than enough cash on hand, as well as corporate and institutional backing. We do not need to have the government funding it as well.
wikipedia already utilizes donations and volunteers and does not need subsidization as the financial needs are already being addressed.
wikipedia also relies on crowdsourced editing which then calls the information into question
Wikipedia articles are written by anybody who wants to write them so they may not even have completely factual information.
wikipedia articles often contain false information that people mistakenly rely on.
wikipedia as free open book where such a information can`t bee find anywhere else, should be subsidize by the government.
wikipedia as private enterprise should not be subsidized with public mone y that could be put to much greater use.