Topic: We should limit judicial activism
judicial activism is just a way to abuse the rule of law and undermine the constitution by allowing judges to make decisions based on their own thoughts instead of the actual law.
judicial activism is just terrorism by another name. the law has been carefully constructed and deliberated over many  years. judicial activists merely want to tears laws down to promote radical ideologies.
judicial activism is more needed today than ever
judicial activism is necessary to determine outcomes of cases that are not black and white.
judicial activism is necessary to make sound decisions
judicial activism is necessary to protect the rights of Americans because they seek to weed out the injustices within the system.
Judicial activism is needed because many laws do not reflect current times and should be adjusted.
judicial activism is needed to make laws fair
judicial activism is not based on pre existing laws and should not be allowed to have free range.
judicial activism is positive because it works for the betterment of the system
judicial activism is positive for minorities and in those cases where there are no solutions
judicial activism is positive to protect minorities
judicial activism is required to maintain our laws
judicial activism is simply an example of people demonstrating their right to express an opinion and to challenge authority based on their beliefs. the state has no right to repress this right.
judicial activism is sometimes necessary to help ordinary people against huge law firms.
judicial activism is sometimes the best way to get things done
judicial activism is the balancing force of the government abuse of power. a government without judicial activism would lead to tyranny
judicial activism is the logical choice and makes much more sense.
judicial activism is the only way to maintain control
Judicial activism is unethical and usurps the power of elected officials.
judicial activism is used to exert control on society
judicial activism is valuable extra layer of protection in the legal system, and can right miscarriages of justice.
judicial activism leads to personal biases taking precedence over the interpretation of constitutional law, which is not what a judge is supposed to do.
judicial activism lets a judge decide what could be better.
judicial activism lets judges give the final verdict based on feelings so they will have the power to let things slide and give people less sentences than they deserve
judicial activism lets judges to use their personal biases to influence public policy.
judicial activism lets justice be served according to law and not judge's pereption
judicial activism lets us know where they stand and what they will decide
judicial activism makes sure are laws are up to date with society.
judicial activism may lead to "despotic behavior", therefore  we should avoid it.
judicial activism must be supported by all means because judges  knows law and they acting inside the law by judicial activism.
judicial activism only screws up the system.
judicial activism prevents impartiality
judicial activism promotes unfair trials.