Topic: We should limit judicial activism
we should limit judicial activism because it is opinion based and causes wrongful convictions
we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective.
we should limit judicial activism because it's effective
We should limit judicial activism because some judges abuse the power they are given and have control over certain sensitive issues according to their own liking and it limit freedom of speech
we should limit judicial activism because some of the judiciary officials decide only for what they want without basing on the law provided by the gokvernment.
we should limit judicial activism because the judges would go based on their personal opinions instead of what is lawful
we should limit judicial activism because the power to make laws belong solely to the legislative branch of government not to unelected judges.
we should limit judicial activism before things get out of hand. each judge has their own personal beliefs and political opinions but they are sworn in to uphold the rule of law and nothing else.
we should limit judicial activism in order to adhere to the constitution as it was originally drafted.
we should limit judicial activism since it is one person making a ruling based on their own feelings.
we should limit judicial activism since that leads to civil unrest do to the nature of activists.
we should limit judicial activism so that jurors are not swayed.
we should limit judicial activism so that we do not depart from the constitution.
we should not limit judicial activism as some trials are unfairly officiated.
we should not limit judicial activism because at the end of the day judiciary officials still know what they are doing and decides based on the law of there government.
we should not limit judicial activism because freedom of speech entitles us to this.
we should not limit judicial activism because it is an important check and balance on the legislative and executive arms of government.
we should not limit judicial activism because it is in the people's best interest to have them preside.
we should not limit judicial activism because judges have better knowledge of the laws than juries do
we should not limit judicial activism because judges should not have to vote against their consciences even if it is constitutional to do so.
We should not limit judicial activism because some issues need experienced judges to make a decisions and to help both sides to see the issue clearly and make it as fair as possible to both parties
we should not limit judicial activism because the judge knows more about the law than juries do
we should not limit judicial activism because the judge would do a better job at what is lawful than a jury would
we should not limit judicial activism since freedom of speech is so important and is a right to be fought for in the country.
we should not support judicial activism because laws are laws and should be strictly followed as written and if they are wrong, then the people need to vote to rewrite them.
we should support judicial activism as not every case fits a black and white mold.