Topic: We should ban naturopathy
naturopathy, while a healthy way of living itself, is not a reasonable way to cure anything.
naturopathy's risks are unknown as it does not undergo the rigorous testing of traditional medicine.
naturotherapy is a using natures antural cures and is not based on manufactured chemical treatments
naturpathy is a better alternative because there are usually fewer side effects to treatments.
naturpathy is basically voodoo medicine based on unproven folk recipes.  there is proven medical research of ways to help a person to get well.  not using these medicines can stop a person from healing.
nautropathy is detrimental to unknowing gullible people who think  all illnesses can be cured through nature. science has shown that many times medical intervention is needed to cure an issue.
nephropathy is dangerous it isn't backed up by actual data and people are putting their lives at risk when they use it.
neuropathy treats many highly dangerous diseases
no government or state can dictate what route of medical treatment a person takes, there are simply no grounds to infringe the freedom of choice
Not all disease can be healed at hospital. Exploring other path can be a winning situation. Naturopathy should be allowed when normal care isn't improving the condition of ill people
Not only are naturopathic treatments ineffective, many are potentially dangerous.
once eradicated illnesses are returning due to people turning to naturopathy.
over centuries natural, folk medicines have worked their ways into medical treatment.  things like willow bark became aspirin. natural medicines have worked for some and if they do no harm why ban them.
peddlers of these naturopathic "remedies" should not be allowed to make money by conning the sick
people are free to choose what they would like to do with their body and that includes naturopathy. based on the principle of individual freedom, there is no reason to ban it.
people are misled into thinking natural remedies are more effective than they actually are, leading to delays in legitimate treatment.
people have autonomy over their own bodies
people have had good success with it and they should be allowed to continue it if they want to.
people have the freedom to choose the treatment they want.
people have the right to chose their own medical care, naturopathy is a valid alternative to modern medicine.
people have the right to consent into a medical treatment even if it is harmful to that individual.
people have the right to control their own health destiny.
people have the right to treat themselves how they see fit. it is the right of the individual what they do with their own body, especially when they are not hurting others, which naturopathy does not.
people have the right to try anything to improve their health and well being , legislation should not be allowed to interfere with this.
people should be able to choose how they treat their ailments.
people should be able to get well without big pharma involved
people should be able to make their own choices about their health as long as they aren't harming other people.