Topic: We should oppose collectivism
i don't really that we should oppose collectivism because the free economics of countries
i think collectivism is good for countries to adopt.    if we are all one and united with each other for the greater good of the country we will have less anger and violence towards one another.
i think that a group should not get to decide something for every single person in it.
i think that we shouldn't oppose collectivism but is see the capitalism with solution
i think we should oppose collectivism because a group isn't any better than an individual
if people don't work together than they are working against each other with conflicting goals so less is accomplished overall
if we all joined together as a collective we could solve our problems more easily
if we should oppose collectivism then the society is not equal and free
In a collectivist society, everyone is considerate of each another and provides support to one another.
In an individualistic society, people are more self-centered and selfish. They look out for themselves and ignore the needs of others.
in collectivism every person is important and taken care of
in collectivism, no single person is left behind.
In collectivist societies, people depend too much on their group. If they leave their group, they may experience loss of identity.
In principal, serving the good of the collective is contingent on the belief that there is value in the individual, as individuals benefit from a strong collective, therefore people should value their own wellbeing above all.
individuals needs are more important than the group
Individuals should be the ultimate arbiters of their decisions, as they are most informed about their needs and which actions would provide their life with meaning and joy.
it can make some people more "equal"
it could be good to have a system that encourages people to look out of the group instead of the individual.
it favors the worth of groups and the good of society.
it is a good idea, since this way, the advantages and disadvantages of a certain topic are analyzed among the community
it is an insidious ideology making people associate with others based on arbitrary characteristics and leads to exploitation of group-think to enact tyrannies of the few by invoking the support of many
It is morally good that the welfare of a large group should be more important than any individual member.
it is through great individuals unrestrained by others that all of us will prosper.
it works as a group to support each other
it would be a good idea, since it is better to personalize the cases, because we do not all think the same
it's basically socialism and it has no place anywhere. the rights of the individual person needs to be recognized.
it's true that there is strength in numbers.
larger groups can offer more protection than individuals alone
many deaths have happened due to collectivism and no matter how it's put into practice it doesn't work.
many thought contribute to greater ideas