Topic: We should subsidize vocational education
grants already exist for those who cannot afford traditional and vocational education. subsidizing vocational education would make little difference except wasting money that could go to more immediate needs.
higher education, such as vocational education, should be paid for only by those partaking in it.  otherwise there would be a lot of wasted funds with drop out rates.
i think that we should subsidize vocational education for society
i think we should because it would help get more people into jobs that pay better.
if everyone could have some vocational education then they’d be more ready for the world of work when they get there.
if one decides to pursue a vocational education, they should find a way to attain it for themselves without the aide taxpayers' money.
if somebody wants to gain some qualification for some jobs, then they need to go to university to get it and not to be subsidize from government.
if subsidies were put into place for vocational education then other areas of education would also want subsidies and this would cost the government far too much to implement.
If the government continues to sponsor billions of dollars in university research, it can sponsor vocational education which is far more useful.
if vocational education was subsidised everyone would be able to partake in it and therefore have more knowledge of the tea they’re going to work in, which would create a more dedicated workforce overall.
if we subsidize vocational education it would be unfair to those who wish to enter other fields.
if you don't do your research you could wind up in debt without the ability to get a job because the place you went to wasn't accredited
If you subsidize vocational education then the schools will raise tuition as they have done at liberal arts colleges.
in a changing world, vocational education is more likely to lead to employment and so it should be subsidised.
is absolutely mandatory for all governments to subsidize vocation education as a help for people who trying to gain some qualification for the jobs.
it does not make economic growth any better
it helps fill valuable positions in the workforce.
it is not as important as a regular form of a degree from a college.
it is rather important to help people studying what they are best at
it is unfair to only subsidize vocational education.  achieving a more advanced education is very expensive and it would also need to be subsidized.
it may create a two tier system were the wealthy choose formal education and the poor feel the only option is vocational training, it may be better to help poorer students to attend university.
it provides people the skills needed to get a good job
it should not be subsidized any more than any other form of education
it's not fair to subsidize one type of education and not another.  we need mechanics, hair dressers, day car providers, etc and all of these occupations can be learned in a vo-ed setting.
like other forms of higher education, if people want to attend vocational schools, they should find a way to pay for it themselves.