Topic: Foster care brings more harm than good
if a kid goes into a foster home, there is a very good chance that they will get adopted, and have another place to live
in foster care, the children do not feel wanted since no one adopted them.  if instead, they were left in state care until a suitable couple were available, they'd be far happier.
In foster system, vulnerable and problematic children end up being raised by people who more often than not are neither qualified nor prepared for such a task.
In one study, foster care children did not differ from matched family children in their sense of well-being, self-esteem, or incidence of depression or behavior problems
In the status quo, foster children are treated more like cattle than human beings, and have little say in the homes that they go to, and have difficulty making their issues known to state supervisors.
is better for kids without any support to be in a foster care and not on the streets , foster care can provide them food , a place to sleep , learn  and socialize.
it can help give a child from a broken home a more stable environment in which they can live a better life
it does because people just do it for the money and can harm the children.
it doesn't because it gives a child a chance at having a normal life with role models, instead of just staying in an institution.
it gives children a chance of success where there otherwise would be none. at risk children have access to opportunities and saftey in foster homes which helps them be successful when they grow up.
it is a crucial required service for orphans and abandoned children
it can be a very rewarding environment for children that have very few options
it is better for a child to be in a home where there is a family
it is better for children to live where there is a family to care for them
it is better for children to remain with their natural parents, foster care confuses children and drives them away from the parents they should be with.
it is better than leaving kids homeless.
it is better to be in  a loving family home than in an institution even if it is only temporary.
It is now on record more children are sexually abused,physically and emotionally abused while under state care
It is reality that many children are in need every year of temporary housing and care, and a more centralized, state run system would require higher costs through things like new infrastructure, resources and salaried caregivers.
it is very beneficial when you take a child from a toxic environment to a healthy and full of love.
it provides a necessary function for abandoned children
many foster children are well adapted and happy
where would they go otherwise? orphanages are surely a far worst option
it was found that 80% of adults who had been placed in Foster Care as children, were doing poorly, with a quarter to one third becoming homeless or living below the poverty level.
it’s better that some children are in foster care and not with their parents if they’d be abused at home.
it's better for children to be in foster care than in a home with abusive parents