Topic: We should subsidize journalism
subsidizing journalism may inadvertently have the effect of lowering its worth, since it would have a guaranteed revenue threshold no matter the quality of content.
Subsidizing journalism means more resources at the disposal of journalists / news media companies. More resources leads to better-quality journalism overall.
subsidizing journalism only succeeds in propping up weak and poorly run organizations which otherwise would soon fail
subsidizing journalism opens up the door to bias in the media.
subsidizing journalism presents a conflict of interest.
subsidizing journalism puts the news into the control of government entities that can prevent truth in reporting to the government's own agenda and imposed beliefs.
Subsidizing journalism will allow individual journals to lift their paywalls, which will increase access.
Subsidizing journalism will be expensive for the government, the money should be used to fulfill more existential needs like housing and food instead.
subsidizing journalism will cause journalists stories to be government controlled can fake news will be spread less
subsidizing journalism will cause more streamlined news and less fake news
subsidizing journalism will create biased reporting
Subsidizing journalism will embed current organizations and prevent start ups who don't have access to the same subsidies from rising up.
Subsidizing journalism will enable higher salaries be paid to journalists and ensure we keep good, talented newspeople reporting the news.
subsidizing journalism will ensure that quality and accurate news is provided, it would crowd out less savory and false journalism.
Subsidizing journalism will increase journalist's job stability, which will encourage high quality college students to become journalists (currently the are discouraged by low wages and few job openings).
subsidizing journalism will lead to corruption, i.e. print the story the way i told you to or your funding is cut.
Subsidizing journalism will lead to legislators threatening news agencies with taking their funding away if they report controversial content.
subsidizing journalism will limit journalists right of freedom of speech and they won't be able to cover the stories we need
subsidizing journalism will make journalist  focus on real journalism, they won't have to worry about writing conspiracies or fake  articles for money.
subsidizing journalism will mute those that go the extra mile to expose the corrupt and we will never get the news we need to hear
Subsidizing journalism will prevent journalists from being activists in their articles in fear that they might lose their funding.
subsidizing journalism would allow government to control what we see and hear to the governments own agenda and can be viewed as a constitutional violation of free speech..
subsidizing journalism would bring more accurate reporting because it would allow for the hiring of more qualified reporters.
subsidizing journalism would encourage more people to go into the field.
subsidizing journalism would eventually lead to biased news and articles
subsidizing journalism would give the government control over it