Topic: We should subsidize journalism
subsidizing journalism would help crowd out the every increasing false news market. if the false news market could not compete with legitimate news, less people would be exposed to dangerous false news.
subsidizing journalism would help those journalists on a lower income to carry on working.
subsidizing journalism would lead to nothing but manipulating journalists and leaving the general public unable to trust in them.
subsidizing journalism would make it beholden to the current administration and the integrity would decline.
subsidizing journalism would make it more efficient.
Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them".
Subsidizing journalism would take money away from other, more needy sectors of society.
Subsidizing multiple news sources is incredibly costly and the money could be used for better ends.
subsidizing would create biased reporting.
subsidizing would help the struggling press remain afloat in this technology age
subsidizing would increase media bias
supporting journalism is obligatory in our democracy society and `free speech` should be defended and approved by all means.
supporting journalism makes sense because people want and need correct facts
susidizing journalism can allow more diverse points of view to be added.
the distribution of knowledge and news is important
the federal government can’t afford to bail out newspapers.
the freddom is very important for civil rights
The government is too debt-burdened. It can't afford to subsidize journalism.
the government subsidizing journalism would create a conflict of interest.
the is enough money in journalism already, and funds available through subsidies should be redirected towards more worthwhile causes such as healthcare.
the journalism won't be able to be trusted.  it could be biased depending on who does the subsidising.
the reporting of news is an important service
the right to free information is crucial for an informed populous and a democratic society
the subsidies could be used on other primary production methods which are very much likely to help boost the economy
there are better things for the government to spend on
there are many people who will write and give their opinion for free. therefore there is no need to throw extra money at journalism by subsidizing it.
there are many sectors need subsidizing more than journalism,  journalists already make good money, more money to them will be a waste.
there are more important issues like health and safety to to spend our money on than journalism
there are much better things to spend money on such as health care and social housing.
there are too many news outlets already so we don’t need to keep sinking money into journalists
there is no need to subsidize journalism: supply and demand will adjust market.
there is simply no need, there is enough money in journalism and plenty of valuable, objective sources available