Topic: We should limit executive compensation
executive compensation is too high. this absurd amount of money they earn should be spread out to the people in the company who do most of the actual work.
executive compensation must be ruled by a fair authority, to avoid people earning more than they are really owed
executive compensation needs to be high to attract the best talent to positions.
executive compensation ought to be limited so that the workforce is seen as being more equal. this will boost morale and increase empowerment of lower level employees.
executive compensation overlooks those that helped the person with executive standing, giving compensation to those that do not deserve it.
executive compensation overlooks those that helped to increase the work vitality of an executive and do not receive compensation even if they have done all the work.
executive compensation packages are necessary to attract the best qualified people into a company - it is simply market economics, supply and demand.
executive compensation promotes company success and competition. it's an incentive for ceos to guide the company and help the company do well and make money for all employees.
executive compensation provides incentive for people to take on high responsibliity positions that drive the economy to new heights creating even more wealth.
executive compensation provides motivation for executives to act in ways that are beneficial to the company and shareholders.
executive compensation recognizes the duties that the employee has and compensations are rewards for a job well done.
executive compensation rewards the rich, whilst the ordinary workers are paid a minimum wage. it simply serves to increase the divide between rich and poor.
executive compensation should be at the discretion of the company who employs them
executive compensation should be fair and equitable and not cause other members in the company and stock holders to suffer because of it.
executive compensation should be given to individuals who work hard and have worked hard to get to the top.
executive compensation should be limited as it allows for poor performing executives to be unjustly rewarded and disincentivises them.
executive compensation should be limited as it can never be justified that they receive these large salaries and bonuses.
executive compensation should be limited as it disincentives them and can reward poor performance by management
Executive compensation should be limited as it is discouraging for a workforce when they can see higher management being paid exorbitant amounts of money.
executive compensation should be limited as it often allows for failing executives to disproportionately rewarded for their failure, which causes damge to sthe company and society
executive compensation should be limited as it unfairly results in trickling down to the end user to pay more money than a product or service is worth.
executive compensation should be limited because excessive salaries take away profits that should go to shareholders
executive compensation should be limited because i don't think the executives should get a bunch extra just because of that position.