Topic: We should limit executive compensation
executive compensation should be limited because it can be taxed as income
executive compensation should be limited because it could lead to high end corruption in organizations.
executive compensation should be limited because it is important that wealth that employees create is shared fairly
executive compensation should be limited because it is not fair that a ceo should not make that much more than the regular workers in a company.
executive compensation should be limited because they already receive the highest salaries and shouldn’t also get bonuses and gifts when other members of the company struggle.
executive compensation should be limited because too many companies pay their executives a disproportionate amount of money compared to the rest of their employees.
executive compensation should be limited in order to narrow the wage gap between c-level employees and line workers
executive compensation should be limited or even totally stopped.  it's a way to pay the people without actually using money and that's not right, allowing for tax evasion or fraud.
executive compensation should be limited since it is unfair to the rest of the employees
executive compensation should be limited so that the lower level employees can make more money
executive compensation should be limited so that there is a fairer distribution of the wealth that companies create across the entire workforce
executive compensation should be limited so that those in power, influential positions in companies do not abuse their power in pursuit of obscene amounts of money.
Executive compensation should be limited so that those who are at the bottom can make more money.
Executive compensation should be limited to a reasonable rate not an outrages 7 figure amount.
Executive compensation should be limited to allow fairer wages to be paid to the majority of workers in a company, all too often the top 1% of people receive 90% of the money , this is unfair.
Executive compensation should be limited to ensure the top staff is not taking all of the rewards for companies that are supported by thousands of workers. All employees contribute to the success of a company.
executive compensation should be limited to make companies more profitable.
Executive Compensation should be limited when there are losses in the company
executive compensation should definitely be limited because it is unfair for one person in a company to make so much more than another person who works for the company
executive compensation should e decided by the company.
executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organisations to attract the best people for their company and increases incentivisation
executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain
Executive compensation should not be limited as these forward thinking people are vital for the growth of companies which result in all employees benefitting.
Executive compensation should not be limited as those who are in those positions have worked for it.