Topic: We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research
embryonic stem cell research should be subsidized. this research will lead the cure for untreatable diseases thus far
embryonic stem cell research should not be subsidized because it requires the destruction of human embryos and so raises serious ethical concerns.
embryonic stem cell research shouldn't be subsidized because the cost could be very expensive for many patients
embryonic stem cell research shouldn't be subsidized because there are more important items that need to be addressed. we have hundreds of thousands of people who are homeless or hungry.
embryonic stem cell research uses embryos that have been fertilized and thus some would regard them as at the beginning stage of human life. using these could therefore be interpreted as human experimentation.
embryonic stem cell research will enable us to make major breakthroughs in regards to the prevention and treatment of diseases.
embryonic stem cell research will find cures for many diseases
embryonic stem cell research will help save lives and is very important.
Embryonic stem cell research will increase the chances of life-saving therapies being developed for deadly diseases.
embryonic stem cell research will lead to medical breakthroughs.
embryonic stem cells are superior to stem cells derived elsewhere because they can potentially grow into any type of cell -- subsidizing this research would allow for scientific research to advance faster.
embryonic stem cells can be used to grow new organs, which can save millions of lives and cure people of debilitating diseases such as heart disease and diabetes.
embryonic stem cells can potentially save lives for many diseases such as diabetes
embryonic stem cells have already been proven to have the capability to save lives. with more research who knows how many more uses they could have in reducing illness and improving quality of life.
embryonic stem research is too close to playing god and should not be supported.
embryonic stem research should banned because the dollars spent on research with no results, could instead by put back into the health care industry for those who are in need of care.
embryonic sten cell research goes against a variety of christian religious beliefs and should not be subsidized.
embryos are fertilized eggs -- until we can settle the debate over where life actually begins, it is unconscionable to use embryos for scientific research.
embryos are potential children so it's unethical to further pursue this.
embyonic stem cell research can be used to cure diseases, genetic abnormalities and deformities that cannot yet be solved
embyronic stem cell research uses cells that would otherwise just be destroyed.
entertaining the idea that embryonic stem cells are unethical is a slippery slope that will devalue women's rights.
escr is morally unacceptable to some people
even if we did find a cure, big pharmaceutical companies would probably drive the price up to ridiculous amounts anyway.
everyone needs to die at some point and embryonic cell research will mainly be used to help the rich.
funding stem cell research incentives obtaining fetal tissue from abortions.