Topic: We should limit executive compensation
executives provide profits to shareholders and should be compensated accordingly
Executives put more of their time, effort and life to put their company at the top. This effort really merits to be recognized. Only through a high compensation is their efforts be recognized
executives setting their own pay leads to greed and excess
executives should be able to make as much money as they can based on their job performance.
executives should be paid just like any other commodity in a free market.they should be compensated at market levels.
Executives should not be paid outrageous salaries if they are working. They make way too much money and it would not be fair to the rest of employees.
Executives should not make 1000% more than their lowest paid employee.
executives should not make millions while their employees struggle to survive
executives should not receive benefits in addition to income as they earn enough anyway
executives shouldn’t be the only ones to get compensation and if that’s the case then no one should get any to make it more fair to the rest of the employees.
executives shouldn’t get more pay and bonuses just because of their job title so it should be limited.
executives that award their own salaries have shown they can not show restraint
executives who run huge profitable companies that employ many people should be highly compensated for doing so
Executives work hard and give up a lot of time and energy to reach that position and  should be compensated accordingly.
executives work hard for their companies and should be compensated accordingly.
executives work hard for their companies, and companies should be allowed to compensate their executives as they see fit
Executives worked hard to get to the top and should be rewarded for this.
having executive compensation provides a lot of instability due to its inconsistent pay. people should always be able to know how much money they will get.
having this compensation ensures executives will continue their jobs properly
High achievers demand high salaries. Its simple economics, stupid.
High executive compensation is necessary to get the best executives for your company
i think that we should limit executive compensation for well economics
i think the salary of executives should be limited to 50 times the salary of the average full-time employee, particularly for companies that wish to participate in any rescue financed by the government
i thnk that we shouldn't  limit executive compensation for security and defense national
if  someone works hard for their bonuses and happen to be an executive too, they should still be able to get bonuses and therefore it shouldn’t be limited.
if a company has received enough profits to offer bonuses to their executives, the money could be better spent on giving bonuses to poorer staff members at the bottom of the chain.
if a company is flourishing, executives deserve extra compensation.
if a person does a great job then they should be compensated
if an executive helps the company grow they should be entitled to a decent amount.
if employees help a business grow they should be compensated handsomely.