Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights
intellectual property rights allows a company to protect their brand name,  inventions, designs etc, without these rights other companies would be able to steal another companies products
intellectual property rights allows a person that came up with an idea to reap the rewards of their ideas.
intellectual property rights allows companies or individuals to far overcharge for what they created.
intellectual property rights allows their creators to receive incentives for their work.
intellectual property rights and law can stifle broader innovation
intellectual property rights are a barrier to innovation and further improvements to an idea by blocking others capitalising on ideas and technology
intellectual property rights are absurd, we deserve to express what we think it does not matter if another already thinks so
intellectual property rights are an expensive way to protect yourself for just a limited amount of time
intellectual property rights are critical to encouraging innovation and making sure creative people are fairly compensated, and should not be abolished.
intellectual property rights are difficult to identify and regulate
Intellectual property rights are ephemeral and hard to define. How do you protect an idea once it has been voiced, They are useless and should be banned.
intellectual property rights are essential to protect ideas, and protect the investments of those who fund these enterprises - without such assurances, many concept would never leave the drawing board.
intellectual property rights are expensive to maintain and hold back the spread of new ideas
intellectual property rights are important as it  gives economic incentive for their creation and helps to stimulate innovation and contribute to the technological progress of countries.
intellectual property rights are important to companies in keeping their value in their people and inventions.
Intellectual property rights are important to protect the assets of those who have invested time and money into a particular idea.
intellectual property rights are like trying to license air, we all breathe air the same as we all have intellect. who is to say one person should own a right over others.
intellectual property rights are meant to protect those who worked harder and produced something valuable
intellectual property rights are necessary to protect those who came up with better solutions and products, they are meant to  give the clever more money to deal with new ideas
intellectual property rights are needed to protect people from harm.
intellectual property rights are not possible to protect because of the many available methods to copy the property
intellectual property rights are often misused by the greedy who only care about getting top dollar for their idea, regardless of whether it is accessible to the masses or not.
Intellectual property rights are old fashioned because now many people can come up with an idea and not get it patented but still be successful
intellectual property rights are outdated and unenforceable in this modern age of technology.