Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
stay-at-home dads should never be subsidized as it was their choice to leave work. Women have a biological reason, men do not.
stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized as it does not ensure that the dad is spending quality or nuturing time with a child and is a waste of tax-payers money.
stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized as it will only create the ability of a bunch of dads to not go to work and play golf instead of providing a positive role model for children.
stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized because it removes the incentive to be the breadwinner
stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized because people shouldn't have children if they can't afford them
stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized because they generally have more than enough income to live off
stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized since the program could be taken advantage of in the future
stay-at-home dads shouldn't be subsidized because they can be considered stay-at-home father's
stay-at-home dads would be more common if we could supplement the family's income.
stay-at-home moms are not subject to being subsidized, continuing the gender inequality status quo and therefore stay-at-home dads should not be subsidized.
Stay-at-home moms are not subsidized and neither should stay-at-home dads be.
stay-at-home moms are not subsidized, allowing for stay-at-home dads who are subsidized continue the ongoing gender inequality at home and not only in the workplace.
stay-at-home moms do not receive subsidies and this can be viewed as another form of gender inequality when women have been at home for generations without the proper financial recognition.
stay-at-home moms don't get paid so why should dads
Stay-at-home moms have  never been paid for their work, so why should stay-at-home dads be subsidized?
Stay-at-home moms have never been subsidized and the same should hold true for dads. Parents who make the choice to stay home to raise their children should live within their means.
stay-at-home mother's are not subsidized so dads should not be subsidized either
stay-at-home parents choose to do this and should not be subsidized
stay-at-home-dads allow for their partner to work outside the home and allow for father child bonding which helps raise children in a productive environment.
staying at home is a choice since they know they won't be getting an income
staying home to raise your children is a personal choice.
studies have shown that children raised with at least one parent at home are happier and healthier.  we should subsidize stay-at-home dads so mare children can benefit.
subsidising stay-at-home dads would bring a more enriching experience for not only the dads but the children too.
subsidizing a parent at home would allow parents the ability to spend more time with their children while they are young.
subsidizing a person to not go to work because a baby is born will only contribute to others to work harder to make up the difference.  men should not be rewarded for creating a baby.
subsidizing dads and not moms goes against the equality this country pretends to have