Topic: We should ban naturopathy
naturopathy is dangerous and can prevent a sick person from receiving appropriate medical treatment.
naturopathy is dangerous as it is not regulated.
naturopathy is dangerous because it is untested by science.
naturopathy is dangerous because it makes people less likely to use proven, effective medicines.
naturopathy is dangerous because its methods may not detect or heal diseases that can be found using modern medicine.
Naturopathy is dangerous because people may depend on it and not get needed medical help.
naturopathy is dangerous because some ingredients are excessive and can cause more health problems down the road
Naturopathy is dangerous. It is letting people believe  that they're treating themselves for real illness, when instead they are just taking placebo and keep getting worse.
naturopathy is essentially fraudsters making a profit from selling a lie to the vulnerable
naturopathy is just a con, charging people a lot of money for so-called naturopathic medicines that have no proven benefits.
naturopathy is just a scam that has no scientific backing.  people that could truly be helped with medicine that choose naturopathy will suffer undue harm.
Naturopathy is just a way for people to make easy money off the fear and helplessness of sick people. we should stick with scientifically proven medicine in order to defend the weakest members of society.
naturopathy is known to be ineffective and can be dangerous
naturopathy is less effective than traditional treatments and there is less regulation for safety and efficacy.
naturopathy is less expensive for people that don't have medical insurance.
naturopathy is medically unproven and could have negative health consequences in the longer term.
naturopathy is merely an alternative treatment, one people might seek out of a conventional treatment doesn't work for them.
Naturopathy is more effective for preventative medicine because there are rarely harmful side effects.
naturopathy is natural and therefore healthy.
naturopathy is natural, therefore, its good for us.
naturopathy is needed for those whose religions are against the use of drugs as medicine
naturopathy is no substitute for modern medicine; in fact, people that prescribe to naturopathy might not get the care they really need in the first place.
naturopathy is not a proven science, and some naturopaths give dangerous advice to clients. this is not a safe practice.
naturopathy is not based in real science and could be potentially harmful
naturopathy is not based on science and can cause serious harm  to those blindly accepting it, therefore it's just fair to ban it .
naturopathy is not based on science and has no evidence to back its claims.
naturopathy is not evidence based and has no factual benefit meaning patients can expect a cure that is not scientifically proven.
naturopathy is not fda approved, so we dont know if its been properly tested.
naturopathy is not medicine, and it may lead  to people skipping actual proven medical techniques for unproven therapies, accelerating their demise.
Naturopathy is not properly regulated, making naturopathic drugs more dangerous an average.