Topic: We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia pages can, essentially, be edited by anyone, so is not a reliable source of informtion and on this basis should not receive any subsidies.
wikipedia plays a vital role in sharing information on the internet, and should be subsidized to continue functioning
wikipedia promotes national and world learning and should be subsidized
wikipedia provides a great service which provides a safe place to find info on all types of topics
wikipedia provides a great utility to most if not all citizens and therefore it is just to subsidize it.
wikipedia provides a knowledge bank for many people to be able to utilize.  if it is subsidized then it can continue to do research and provide better information.
wikipedia provides a useful collection of knowledge, and should be subsidized to ensure its continued existance
wikipedia provides a valuable public service; subsiding it would guarantee equal access to everyone.
wikipedia provides a valuable service, yet has to rely on donations to survive. if there were no wikipedia, access to impartial, well-sourced information on the web would be limited.
wikipedia provides a vast amount of information at our fingertips
wikipedia provides a vast amount of knowledge to be accessible to all. subsidizing this will ensure this knowledge continues to be available.
wikipedia provides a wealth of information on any subject you can think of. this is highly benificial to the education system and should be subsidized.
wikipedia provides a wealth of information to schools to aid with the teaching of students so we should subsidize it.
wikipedia provides an endless amount of information right at our fingertips.
wikipedia provides an invaluable service and we need to secure its ability to exist in the near and distant future
wikipedia provides good information
Wikipedia provides important information to people around the world.
wikipedia provides information that is free and easy to get on any subject
wikipedia provides instant information  to help educate someone on any topic
wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.
wikipedia provides useful information
wikipedia provides useful informations
wikipedia provides valuable information for the public and must be kept free.
wikipedia provides valuable information not only to the public but to educational institutions and so we should subsidize it to keep it going.
wikipedia provides vital information quickly. subsidizing it guarantees that this can continue.
wikipedia puts a world of information at our fingertips
wikipedia relies too much on the people to pay for them and risk shutting down each year
wikipedia serves a great purpose and is very valuable
wikipedia shoud be independent and with subsidization this may be at risk depending on the subsidization source
wikipedia should aim to be a neutral source; public funding would help this goal by making it a public good.
wikipedia should be financed different ways
wikipedia should be left as is.  once we pour money into it, we lose the authenticity.
wikipedia should be self funding as the company has access to the resources it needs without subsidies