Topic: We should limit judicial activism
judicial activism goes against the will of the people
judicial activism has a place in the law
judicial activism has been shown to be a critical opponent of oppressive and unjust regulations
judicial activism has brought about good change over the years & shined a light on bad laws & helped to change them
judicial activism has no place in the supreme court
judicial activism helps balance out the justice system.
judicial activism helps bring about needed to legislative changes
judicial activism helps prevent the tyranny of the majority
judicial activism helps strike down unjust and morally reprehensible laws and legislation.
judicial activism helps to bring about needed reform
judicial activism introduces personal biases that should never be involved when interpreting the constitution.
judicial activism is a control key put in place for counterbalance the overuse of power of law
judicial activism is a cornerstone of constitutional democracy and it should be encouraged.
judicial activism is a danger for vital laws voted. judicial judges could use them to block vital laws just for their personal gain
judicial activism is a good thing as it goes by the constitution
judicial activism is a great check for overzealous policy makers that may not have the nation's best interest at heart.
judicial activism is a power that a judge should use sparingly and in extreme cases.
judicial activism is a time consuming delaying tactic. costly and ineffective.
judicial activism is a travesty to the judicial process.  the laws are the laws and not up for one person to interpret it another way based on how they feel that day.
judicial activism is absolutely wrong and should be banned in all countries as bad perception of law. first law and evidences and the everything else.
judicial activism is an abuse of power
judicial activism is an important part of out country.
judicial activism is another overreach of power where authorities try to legislate certain behaviors. people should be free to make decisions within the law and not be mandated by another choices.
judicial activism is biased and should be trashed.
judicial activism is contrary to the constitution.
judicial activism is crucial and inevitable in some circumstances due to the different interpretations of the constitution and law, especially when times change and laws don't.
judicial activism is crucial to upholding our laws
judicial activism is dangerous for our penal institutions
judicial activism is dangerous in that it allows for personal opinion to possibly get in the way of true justice.  personal opinion clouding what is law should not be allowed.
judicial activism is designed to help protect individuals and give every person a right to freedom of speech
judicial activism is essential in keeping the interpretation of the law up to date, enabling problem areas to be addressed in court.
judicial activism is important to society.
Judicial activism is important when there is no clear law concerning a situation.