Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they could be out earning a lot of money doing less work.
We should subsidize stay at home dads since it's so important for kids to have a father figure in their lives. Dads could be with their children and still have money to help live on.
we should subsidize stay at home dads so that more women can be the primary earner.
we should subsidize stay at home dads, the same way we subsidize stay at home mums. this also ensures mums have the same access to return to work so benefits men's and women's equal rights.
we should subsidize stay at home parents regardless of gender, equal rights are paramount to an equal and fair society so stay at home dad's should not be excluded by gender
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads as all women are entitled to maternity leave so this will make it fair and a father to child bond is important.
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads as they are as important for the healthy development of children as mothers.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because  it is consider as a job the only different is they are at home
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because being a fulltime parent is work, too.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because children grow up to be better citizens with stay-at-home dads in the house.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because it creates a gender neutral role
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because it helps support gender equality and gets more women into the workforce.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because it lets them spend more time with their kids
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because it supports gender equality and would promote more women in the workforce and in leadership roles.
we should subsidize sta-yat-home dads because they should be treated equally as women because women want to be treated equally as men in their jobs
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because this will result in more females becoming bread winners and ultimately this will balance out society
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because we subsidize stay-at-home mums. to limit a benefit via gender is discriminatory.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because with them staying home, they more and likely would not have the same income level had the wife stayed at home since income equality still exists.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads because women usually don't make equal pay to the man so it would help make up the difference lacking in the wife's salary.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads especially if he is the only potential income earner for the family.
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads for incapacity
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads for work only incapicty  dads
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads if the person is not apt for work
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads it allows the dad to spend more time with his kids
we should subsidize stay-at-home dads so more dads can stay at home to raise their children, thus reducing delinquency.