Topic: We should limit judicial activism
there should not be the availability for opinion to override law
there's interpretation and veering way off the mark which is not good for the legal system.
this is the only way to uphold the laws and liberties as we know them.
this will never be a just country if judges can make up their own rules.
through judicial activism, judges can use their own personal judgement to eliminate laws that they feel are unjust.
times have changed since the constitution was drafted; judicial activism ensures that outdates legislation can be challenged.
too much judicial activism can lead to people not letting the system do its job.
we cannot allow too much leeway here.  the law is the law and too much interpretation can be detrimental.
we cannot have judges that hand down rulings based solely on personal or cultural opinion. they must use a reasoning which the law supports.
we have no way of knowing why a judge ruled the way they did so just let them do their job
we have to respect the view of judges so they need to have the freedom to express judicial activism.
we need to limit it because it could put someone in prison for something that is based on a personal opinion.
we need to limit judicial activism. the law is written to be follow as stated. when you open this up for personal opinion it defeats the purpose of the law.
we should allow for judicial activism to offset outdated laws
we should allow judicial activism as no matter how many laws there are, there is always an exception that goes outside the box and needs to be addressed individually.
we should fight against judicial activism because there are laws on books for a reason and they should not be ignored for the whim of a judge and their thoughts on a matter.
we should further promote judicial activism in order to communicate to a wider audience.
we should limit  judicial activism because people making rulings on personal opinions instead of the law could set a bad president and other people may try to do the same crime if it is gotten away with
we should limit it, laws should not be changed for special circumstances
we should limit judicial activism and keep the laws the ways they are
we should limit judicial activism as it goes outside the set laws and eventually could go to far to one person creating their own agendas.
we should limit judicial activism as that does not follow the laws the people voted on.
we should limit judicial activism because a judge is there to interpret the law, not create it.
we should limit judicial activism because a lot of the time the judge brings into his own personal feelings and not what is right with the law
we should limit judicial activism because it can become too powerful and become it's own judge and jury and become impartial.
we should limit judicial activism because it is not fair and base on a person personal emotion or opinion
we should limit judicial activism because it is not right to make political stands when judging crime. each judge only has the authority and responsibility to decide whether or not a current law was broken