Topic: We should subsidize journalism
journalism provides people with accurate and up to date information that is essential to a positive well being.
journalism serves as a vital check on institutional corruption, be it corporate, government, or otherwise.
journalism should be able to stand on its own without the taxpayers being forced to contribute to its upkeep
journalism should be completely free and clear of government intervention
journalism should be free from bias and present facts no matter what. if subsidized news would.have an automatic bias towards whoever is funding it which leads to inaccurate reporting and doubtful audiences.
journalism should be funded by the government as it promotes learning and worldwide communication.
journalism should be subject to the same market forces as everything else
journalism should be subsidised to enable more publications to circulate giving a wider choice of view.
journalism should be subsidize to promote impartial news and rigorous work
journalism should be subsidized as it helps to inform the public & keep corruption at bay
journalism should be subsidized as the media is a important part of our democracy as it allows people to be more informed and clued up on all the issues in the world.
journalism should be subsidized because democracy can only function if the electorate is well informed
journalism should be subsidized to ensure people's voices are heard and represented.
Journalism should be subsidized to ensure that the news reported is objective and full of facts as opposed to the subjective views that can be posted by anyone on social media.
journalism should be subsidized to make sure every journalist has what they need to investigate stories.
journalism should be the most authentic source of information
journalism should not be influenced by the government.
journalism should not be subsided as this would call into question whether the media are truly independent and would be a conflict of interest.
journalism should not be subsidized as they make money hand over foot with advertising and the money could go to a better cause that is in need.
journalism should not be subsidized because subsidies could too easily be allotted according to political beliefs.
journalism should remain a part of the free enterprise system and be supported by those who consume it, not a government subsidy.  they should be used for essentials welfare programs only.
journalism subsidized by authoritarian regimes becomes a propaganda machine used to control people, telling them what to think and spreading lies to hide totalitarian regimes' abuses
journalism supplies use with lots of information
journalism that benefits from subsidies would be less reliant of advertising revenue, and could deliver a higher standard of output.
journalism that is subsidized by the government will lead to censoring the media from reporting negative things about the government.
journalism today is only business and support from government or any other main institution is wrong and should not be considered.
journalism would be government controlled if subsidized.
journalism would be more accurate with subsidization.