Topic: We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should not be subsidized because the company should provide the funding as the person is working for them, and the money could be better spent on a formal education.
vocational education should not be subsidized because the money would be better spent on increasing the salaries of those who have completed their education.
vocational education should not be subsidized because the students don't get a classical education and are thus not well rounded upon earning their degree.
vocational education should not be subsidized people should fund themselves
vocational education should pay for itself and would be less taxing on others
vocational education shouldn't be subsidized because it takes a lot of money out of people's pockets
vocational education takes away the responsibility of employers to train and employ their staff
vocational education teaches people a trade
vocational education teaches skills that will be eternally needed
vocational education trains people for low paying, dead end jobs
vocational education trains people with the types of skills that are becoming obsolete due to robotics and ai
vocational education usually leads to highly paid jobs. therefore the state should not be funding this.
vocational education will be too expensive and costly.
vocational education would enable people who do not wish to go to college obtain a career and be independent in life.
vocational jobs  play a vital role in society, but not as many students are pursuing these careers. subsidizing vocational education allows schools to still afford to offer these courses.
vocational jobs are at a big risk of being robot driven
vocational jobs tend to lead to well paid jobs so subsidizing the training is unnecessary.
Vocational schools are a more efficient form of secondary education as they skip the traditional liberal arts and general education courses of most universities, and instead focus on practical courses for a person's career.
Vocational schools help ensure that individuals will have the basic skills required to become a productive member of the labor force.
vocational schools offer an excellent chance to develop some vital skills and careers in hands-on fields which don’t' require traditional four-year academic training.
Vocational schools teach students - in a relatively short amount of time - professions that have high earning potential. In two years or less, graduates can already be working and making money.
vocational skills such as hairdressing and baking should not be supported by public funds.  if students want to learn these future careers they should pay for this education just as those going to college.
vocational studies are often overlooked in favour of more traditional studies leading to a shortage of people to work in vocational occupations that are essential.
vocational studies should not be subsidised taking funding away from other areas that are more deserving.
vocational training is cheaper than college and often results in high paying jobs, so they can easily pay for their education after graduating.