Topic: We should limit judicial activism
each case has different circumstances and certain things need to be taken into consideration for each one. judicial activism allow the court to consider the circumstances of each crime.
every crime is committed for a different reason.  the judicial system needs to be able to take these circumstances into consideration for each individual case.
every judge is trusted to give their own interpretation of the constitution; there is no way to prevent implicit biases from coming up in their decisions.
everybody is entitled to an opinion and everybody has different ones. it isn’t fair to punish someone based on something other than the law.
everyone is entitled to his opinion.
giving judges the freedom to make judgments is what makes our country great.
having a different perspective and argument could mean a fairer outcome.
having someone judge from outside tradition can be good in a lot of instances
i  dont think judicial activism is necessary for protecting people's rights
I do not think that judicial activism is necessary to protect the rights of Americans
i don´t should limit judicial activism becuase not is moral
i don't think that we should limit judicial activism becuase no free
i dont't that we should limit judicial activism neither race because people is free
i like that judges have their own opinions on cases and use those opinions to effect the rulings.   sometimes the evidence is wrong and a judge needs to see that and decide themselves.
if not limited,judicial activism can go further than intended
if other parts of the governement do not work we have to rely on judges to develop justice.
if the legislature and/or executive branches violate the constitution, judicial activism is a remedy for this.
if we didn't have judicial activism the alternative might be worse
in any case, does not matter what kind of case is on the court. not following the evidences in the process is out of mind and absolutely wrong.
increasing judicial activism would allow constitutional democracy to move in time with today's society and values.
interpretations of the law has changed over the years.  one example is woman's rights.  unless a judge ruled for changes to the law we would still be living in a white man world.
it can help lead to positive change
it causes so much of a disturbance it needs to be limited
it is better to go by the laws than someone's opinion.
it is helpful for the judiciary to take public action should they wish to do so as it demonstrates that they are human.
it is important that the highly experienced, well trained people at the top of the judicial system can use their own experiences and common sense when passing judgments - else anyone could be a judge.
it is important that the true thoughts of the judge  at trial are heard.
it is important when judging complicated legal matters that all information is taken in to consideration, and this is quite simply impossible to do without including ones own opinions on the matter.
it is impossible to expect human beings, even judges, to not use their inherent biases when rendering a decision.