Topic: We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
dad’s should be able to stay at home and if there was a subsidy for them to do so it would make them feel more able to be home with their kids.
dads are less likely to want to stay at home but it may be the better option for women who have great jobs instead of forcing them to quit.
dads are likely to stay out of their careers ant might find it difficult to come back to work
dads are responsible for raising their kids, that doesn’t mean they deserve financial help
dads came provide warm, loving care to their children just as mothers can. this would make it easier for them to do so.
dads can bond better with their children
dads can choose to be stay at home dads, but they must take the consequences of their choice without society as a whole having to pay for their decisions.
dads can choose to stay at home, but that is the choice they make as opposed to working.  we do not need to subsidize your choice to make it affordable.
dads do not always get the same bonding experience the mother gets due to not being able to afford to take time off work to be with their babies and children so subsidising would make for better family life.
dads need to be more involved in their kids lives and subsidizing them to stay at home will make it easier for them to do so
dads on average earn more than mums, many families do not have a resident dad and most could not afford for dad to be at home while mum needs time off to recover from the birth and breast feed.
DADS SHOULD BE ABLE TO STAY AT HOME WITH THEIR CHILDREN JUST AS MUCH AS MOTHERS
Dads should be allowed  stay home and care for their children without the risk of losing their income.
Dads should be encouraged to go out to work to support their family which is how it's always been, subsidizing them to stay at home would do the opposite of this and would also be a burden on tax payers.
dads should be subsidizes to reduce the stigma of a man staying home to raise his children. dads are important to the fabric of the family and staying at home gives the children a new perspective on it.
dads should be working and mothers staying at home.
Dads should not be subsizided to stay at home because it would be a too much of a burden on taxpayers.
dads that stay home are very likely to have financial burdens on their families.
dads who choose to stay home are taking away resources from the potential workforce. this could hurt a nation's economy and make the future less promising for younger generations.
dads who stay at home are as valuable as moms who stay at home and should be subsidized for the wellbeing of their children
dads who stay home provide a great asset in the raising of future generations of children. therefore, subsidies should be given to them to help them continue in their family endeavors.
dads would be able to bond with their babies
dads, just the same as all parents, do not deserve a subsidy to stay at home. its their children and they should be financially responsible for their upbringing.
Do stay at home Mum's currently get subsidized?If not what makes a Dad doing it special?
employers can't afford to do this its hard enough new mums have time off