Topic: We should end mandatory retirement
mandatory retirement is beneficial to the workforce and to employers. new hires get paid less than seasoned workers and can often do the job at a higher rate of speed.
mandatory retirement is discrimination against older people who may still have something of value to contribute to society.
Mandatory retirement is discriminatory and outdated.
mandatory retirement is discriminatory and people should have free choice when they wants to retire.
mandatory retirement is discriminatory and should be banned
Mandatory retirement is discriminatory on the basis of age, which is an immutable characteristic much like gender or race in that one has no control over it.
mandatory retirement is essential to allow for people to move up the career ladder and obtain higher positions in companies.
mandatory retirement is essential to make sure jobs are available for the younger generation. if older people clog up jobs you are limiting the opportunities and life chances for the next generation.
Mandatory retirement is good for companies by making space for new ideas and innovation.
mandatory retirement is harmful to the nation's productivity and economy
mandatory retirement is harsh.  it pushes workers who might still be viable out of the workforce for no other reason than their age, often leaving them to struggle.
mandatory retirement is important for people to heed to so that the older generation can enjoy their lives more
mandatory retirement is necessarily, in many cases, to force someone out of a job that their age dictates they can no longer do appropriately.
mandatory retirement is necessary in some fields to let go of the older, more error-prone workers.
mandatory retirement is necessary to free jobs for young people
mandatory retirement is needed to keep businesses new and fresh with innovation from the younger generation.
mandatory retirement is needed to pump new life and ideas into business places
mandatory retirement is not fair for those who are actually more than capable to carry on with their jobs
mandatory retirement is physically, mentally and emotionally damaging to individuals
mandatory retirement is purely age discrimination
mandatory retirement is sidelining those who are still capable of working, leading to poor mental health and isolation
mandatory retirement is sometimes necessary to get rid of older, slower, more error-prone workers, infusing the talent pool with younger, fresher minds.
mandatory retirement is too much of a one-size-fits-all policy that refuses to take into account the physical and mental health of each individual worker.
Mandatory retirement is unconstitutional ageism because it discriminates on inalienable characteristics of the worker.
Mandatory retirement is unethical because it tries to push out workers who have earned higher wages through years of hard work.
mandatory retirement is unfair for those older in the workforce who are still valuable and actively want to continue contributing to the workforce
mandatory retirement is unfair to people who need a job when social security cannot pay the bills