Topic: We should ban naturopathy
banning naturopathy is obligatory to our government because is experimental and there is no quaranties in such a healing or medicine help.
banning naturopathy is the best thing to do since not doing so allows people to believe that natural "necessarily" means "safe".
Banning naturopathy will allow individuals who have been harmed by it to seek compensation.
Banning naturopathy will allow the government to punish the people who profit off of lying to people and actually disincentivize future sale and advertisement.
Banning Naturopathy will not make anyone safer, it will only drive it underground where regulation is impossible and the danger is far more real.
banning naturopathy would help prevent people from experimenting with natural items to cure their health issues without really knowing what the harm could be.  just because it's natural, doesn't mean it's safe.
banning naturopathy would prevent people from treating medical conditions naturally, which may be healthier than  drugs made in labs.
because naturopathy uses more natural ingredients it is better for you
being of natural origin does not harm the organism with invasive treatments
certain religions only use this type of care and it is their right.
Conventional medicine often overlooks other parts of wellness like diet, exercise, and supplements. Naturopathy makes sure that someone is paying attention to those other components that are often equally important.
despite the medical community wanting naturopathy banned, where is the evidence that it absolutely does not work.  how can using nature not be a effective treatment.  of course it can.
discouraging sick people from traditional medicine is dangerous.
even if a naturopath treatment  may not have a lot of info on it, it still might work for the person being prescribed it.
everybody should have the right to do what they choose to their own bodies, and naturopathy has its place, if only as a placebo.
for some people it is an alternative way as the cost of treatment could be unaffordable for some people
freedom to choose how to take care of one's self  is a basic human right and cannot be controlled by government
Given that the state isn't banning other forms of non-medical care like chiropractors, it cannot ban naturopathy.
health professionals should use a science-based approach  and naturopathy is based on pseudoscience
Homeopathic medicine works no better than a placebo.
Homeopathy addresses the root cause of a problem, not just its symptoms.
i believe naturopathy should definitely be banned.   this way of healing is unproven, untested and can be extremely dangerous to the people using them.   use what we know.
i don't think  should ban naturopathy that very imortant for healthness
i don't think that we should ban naturopathy because is limit
ideal for mild conditions, non-invasive treatments and prevention of other more serious diseases
if a person wants to try a natural route for their ailments, that is their perogative.
if patients feel it is helpful to them, they should be allowed to try
if people are daft enough to believe it let them