Topic: We should adopt a multi-party system
multi party systems lead to less extremes of government, because coalitions are more common a greater range of views and policies are represented in government.
multi party systems never work and bring people against each other.
multi party systems represent all the interests of all people and is therefore the most diverse system
multi-parties would broaden representation.
multi-party coalitions are incredibily inefficient systems, and the decision making process is slowed dramatically.
multi-party system allows people of different ideals to have their representation.  it helps to maintain a democracy and fairness in a country.
multi-party system can help us dealing with social problems
multi-party system elections have a great financial cost often running into millions of dollars for nationwide elections. this money could be put to better use.
multi-party system has no negativity, which means people has larger selection to choose from.
multi-party system is a waste of space and time
multi-party system is good to have choices
multi-party system its too expensive
multi-party system leads to a democratic country
multi-party system makes for better voter choice on the ballot and may increase participation as a result.
multi-party system should not be adopted as it will cause bickering among political parties and nothing will get done.
multi-party systems allow for wider expression of opinions and wider scope for free speach
multi-party systems allow people to truly express their opinions in a political sphere and allow those people to have their voices heard
multi-party systems allow several viewpoints to be expressed and represents more people.
multi-party systems are costly and inefficient to run, and provide breeding grounds and mouthpieces for more harmful, extremist views.
multi-party systems are crucial to allow all people to have the opportunity for all americans to have the voices heard
multi-party systems are ineffective as special interest groups with a lot of influence can unfairly influence a voting process
Multi-party systems are less stable than two-party systems.
Multi-party systems are not efficient. The ruling coalition often has to negotiate with the minority parties in its coalition in order to pass legislation.
multi-party systems are populist and demagogue factories
multi-party systems are proven around the world to work better
multi-party systems bring diversity to politics, and giving more voices to the population
multi-party systems can cause those in charge  a lot of havoc when it comes to law making.  they need to be able to depend on those they work with.
multi-party systems cause the decision-making  process to be slow and inefficient due to the clogging multiplicity of viewpoints.
multi-party systems cause there to be too much division in a country
multi-party systems create more animosity between factions, and can delay elections by no candidate having a clear majority
multiparty systems dilute the ability to accomplish important anything  because everyone has a say. single party system is more efficient because because all are working towards them.