Topic: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons
A country is entitled to develop any weapon that will help it defend itself against an enemy.
a country should have the right to defend itself in whatever way it sees fit even if they do not intend to use nuclear weapons.
A miniature arms race between missile defense developers and missile developers creates an arms race that costs a massive amount to any state with either industry.
a nuclear free world would ensure humanities survival
a nuclear war would kill everyone and everything on the whole planet, the whole human race would be wiped out, there is no way we would ever come back.
A terrorist group with a nuclear weapon could cause immense and immediate damage and devastation.
abolishing nuclear weapons is a good action to take. nuclear weapons are dangerous and could expose the planets to extreme destruction
Abolishing nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal. The technology exists and it will be used.
Abolishing nuclear weapons is the only way to ensure that those weapons never fall in the hands of nefarious actors, such as terrorist organizations.
Abolishing nuclear weapons would be a first step toward world peace.
Abolishing nuclear weapons would benefit all of humanity.
Abolishing nuclear weapons would diffuse existing tensions between a number of nuclear states, such as Israel and Iran, the USA and North Korea, and India and Pakistan.
abolishing nuclear weapons would put us at greater risk.
abolition is futile.  there will be some countries that refuse to comply, which will mean only terrorist counties will have these devestatingly destructive weapons
abolition of nuclear weapons is an essential part of creating world peace. no nation should possess the power to entirely annihilate another with such long-term destructive weapons.
all nuclear weapons should be abolished.  the bombs strike at innocent people not just soldiers.  the bombs can knock out cities.  true devastation are the results of them.
allowing nations to have nuclear weapons contributes to peace as nobody wants to start a war that will result in mutual destruction.
although we hope never to use them, we need to keep our nuclear weapons as a deterrent against others using them therefore we should not abolish them.
Any state or non-state actor having nuclear weapons creates fear for other countries that pushes them to develop their own nuclear weapons, creating a cycle of development that can only be ended through abolition.
Any use of nuclear weapons in war would result in mutually assured destruction and likely the devastation of the entire planet, and any amount of conventional warfare is preferable to that outcome.
Any use of nuclear weapons violates international laws of war because they indiscriminately kill civilians and cause long term environmental damage. Given that there is no legitimate use, we should abolish them.
any weapon that can destroy the world should be eliminated
any weapon that is strong enough to destroy the whole planet is completely unnecessary.