Topic: We should limit executive compensation
executive compensation should not be limited because companies have to be able to provide a competitive compensation package to attract the best ceos.
executive compensation should not be limited because it would act as a barrier to companies that have to compete in the international marketplace for the best talent
executive compensation should not be limited so that a company can hire the best talented executives to make the right decisions
executive compensation shouldnt be banned companies pay what they want to pay them
executive compensation shouldn't be limited because a person can get immediate access to those funds
executive compensation takes profits from the company and shareholders, giving it to the people at the top who do the least amount of work.
executive compensation too often fails to deliver and as such causes working issues, therefore it should not only be limited but stopped completely.
executive compensation will lead to public distrust in big corporations, and will be the doom and fall of developed countries society.
executive deserve to be compensated for their stressful jobs.
executive incentives are good measures to improve their quality of life
Executive level employees have worked hard to achieve the level they have  and should be compensated for this.
executive pay is out of control. when an executive can earn the same in a week as a manual worker earns in a year, then something is wrong.
Executive pay should be limited so that a culture of brazen risk-taking and corruption cannot take hold again as it did previous to the last financial crash.
Executive positions hold more liability.
executive receives the highest salary there is for less work and should limit compensation
executive roles are stressful and carry additional pressures and risks, and so the rewards need to be greater to incentivise competitive success.
executive staff take far too much money from all industries, while the average worker is paid minimum wage or close to it the people doing the least work take the most money, things should be made fairer.
executive talent needs to be compensated competitively.
executives already get compensations and it needs to be regulated the amount of the reward so as not to allow executives to have too much power over employees that helped them get their position.
executives already make good pay so limit their compensation and hopefully some of what would have gone to them will go to the other employees that need it more
executives are often over compensated to the detriment of the company and other employees.
executives are paid way too much relative to other workers; compensation given to them can easily be used to give raises to a large number of workers.
Executives are paid what the market will bear for making important company wide decisions.
Executives are the driving force behind a companys success or failure and should be paid according to their accomplishments, without limitations. They should be encouraged by their salary structure to succeed.
executives are the employees that drive innovation and their compensation should not be limited