Topic: We should prohibit women in combat
only men are natural fighters therefore we should prohibit women in combat.
prohibiting women in combat is sexist.  women are just as capable of men in combat with proper training.
prohibiting women in combat is sexual discrimination; women should be free to make their own choices.
prohibiting women in combat would be discrimination and sexist. women can do just as good a job as men
provided they are not placed in overtly physical roles, there is a place for women in the military - inclusion should be based on individal ability, not dictated by outdated ideas about gender restrictions.
some occupations require specialist physical skills and attributes that the female body simply doesn't possess, and it is harmful to think otherwise merely as a sop to gender equality.
some women are more skilled combat fighters than men.why should their skills be stifled?
some women are not as physically strong as men
the idea that women should not be allowed in combat is antiquated and anti-equality. women should be given the same options in the military that men are given.
the strongest people should be in combat regardless of their gender
the women are as much or more hardened than the men, and with the received training they can handle situations of stress even better than some men.
There are cases where women have excelled in combat especially as fighter pilots and strategic leadership.
there are many combat roles that woman can handle as well as if not better than men due to their unique viewpoint.
there are many jobs that women are better qualified than men in combat
there are valid biological differences between male and female strengths + capabilities - ignoring these can lead to unsafe discrepancies on the battlefield.
there is a greater danger in combat because of the thought that they will be unable to fight and the men will be watching them to see what they are doing
there is much more harm that can be done to women in combat then men.  also, there is a chance they may be pregnant putting an unborn baby in danger.
there is no need to prohibit women from combat as long as there  are conditions for fitness in place. any individual who meets the necessary fitness levels will be able to be of use in combat.
there is no reason that a women that meets the standards should not be put in combat if she chooses to do so
there is no reason to believe that women cannot be as reliable as men on the battleground.
there is no reason to force those who are fit for combat to leave the armed forces as long as they voluntarily want to be in them
there is way too much more that can be done to a captured woman in a combat area then can happen to a man.
they are equally as strong as men so they should be allowed to fight
they are not a physically strong as men
they are not as strong, or have the endurance that men do
they aren't as good at it and since they make babies, they should not be put in harm's way.
they do not have the physical strength that men do
they don't belong in the battlefield, they belong at home with the children
this is discrimination on the basis of sex