Topic: We should ban private military companies
pmcs should be banned as they exist only to profit from war, unrest and destruction. they are immoral
pmcs should be banned as they profit from unrest and war and it is therefore in their interests to ensure their is always conflict in the world.
pmcs should be banned, as they are profiting from war and destruction. it is their interest to cause and prolong discord in the world.
pms should not be banned as they provide a service to countries and organizations to allow them to carry out their lives and business in safety.
PRIVATE  COMPANIES TAKE JOBS AWAY FROM THE ARMED FORCES
private armies are generally used to violate human rights because they are not subject to restrictions like current armies
private armies are necessary to enter in extremely dangerous conflict zones where the use of irregular soldiers is necessary
private companies are able to be better funded than government militaries and therefore are better equiped for dangerous situations
private companies are very useful to us and necessary if we have a shortage
private companies have an incentive to improve and be more efficient, in stark contrast to the government bureaucracy. having private military would spawn competition and motivate companies to improve.
private companies have less strict guidelines and less oversight which makes them careless
private companies of any kind play an important role in society, besides they are companies and business service providers
private companies should be free to organize and supplement whatever public services are available, including military.
private companies should have the opportunity to make money for their services.
private militaries are a threat to security if they decide to overthrow the government
private militaries should be banned as they could be a security risk if they turn on the state
Private military  companies have an incentive to continue the military action so they should be banned
private military allows for less red tape to get things done and should not be banned.
private military companies abuse the locals and lack effective oversight so should be banned.
private military companies all have different standards and can result in everything varying from the usual standards and therefore they should be banned.
private military companies allow more investment than governments can afford and so are essential to future security and should not be banned.
private military companies allow people with money to hire their own armies to force others to do what they want. military forces should only be allowed at national level.
private military companies are a business like any other and are subject to national and international regulations
Private military companies are a legitimate business model, the use of which could save the government on its defense budget.
private military companies are a part of the free, capitalist society and therefore cannot be banned.
private military companies are a risk to the general public as they are not regulated and therefore should be banned
private military companies are a threat to our democracy and should not be tolerated anymore