Topic: We should abolish the three-strikes laws
we have enough issues with overfilled prisons without locking up someone that nicks a pack of chewing gum three times
we need the three strikes as a deterrent
we need to protect ourselves from repeat offenders who are never going to change
we need to strike down the three-strikes law as it makes no sense to throw someone in jail if one would get 3 offenses over a 50, 60, 70 year or more period.
we need to take control of criminals and hold them responsible for their actions.
we should  abolish the three-strikes laws because they can put people away for minor crimes
we should abolish the three strikes law. it doesn't deter crime and it is expensive to implement because it means more people will be prison for life. taxpayers don't deserve to pay for that.
we should abolish the three strikes laws because the punishment is just enough for their convictions and no need to add more another years.
we should abolish the three-strike laws because a person could have one offense every 20 years and he would go to prison.
we should abolish the three-strikes law because people are receiving life sentences for relatively minor crimes without regard to how long a sentence would normally be for that crime
we should abolish the three-strikes law because the definition of a previous violent offense could be arbitrary and prisons need to be places for rehabilitation, not excessive punishment.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws and just stick to one law, because it may stop reoffending if it's that harsh
we should abolish the three-strikes laws beacuase of human race
We should abolish the three-strikes laws because a crime is a crime and the criminal need to be punished for what type of crime they are committing and not base on how many times they committed the crime
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because i don't think people should be given more than one chance, they are grown adults and know right from wrong
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because it is a waste of tax payers money to give criminals so many chances
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because it is not truly effective in reducing crimes
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because people can be rehabilitated.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because the criminals shouldn't be given more than one chance to turn their life around.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws because they discriminate against over-policed communities.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because they do not allow for circumstances beyond control.  a flat ruling across the board takes away a judges right to consider circumstances that came into play.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because they have no effect in detering crime
We should abolish the three-strikes laws because they introduce arbitrary punishment for some crimes over others, when the action was the same.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws because they lead to more people going to jail and wasting their potential when they could be working and having families and living their lives.