Topic: The use of public defenders should be mandatory
the use of a public defender should be mandatory because some people  might not be able to afford a private one. it also stops the rich people from spending lots of money to get away with murder.
the use of public defenders ensures that everybody, irrespective of status, has access to legal representation: this is a basic human right.
the use of public defenders is a serious drain on the coffers of government departments, and proven criminals have no right to such expenditure.
the use of public defenders is very important, but neither should it be mandatory
the use of public defenders must not be mandatory because it violates the right to freedom of each individual. the freedom to choose can not be limited
the use of public defenders ought to be mandatory because every human being deserves a lawyer to defend them against charges that they face.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory as it prevents richer people from having an unfair advantage by paying more money to get a better lawyer.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because a lot of the time people on trial have no idea what is best for them
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because both parties will have a fair fight
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because is legal and juditail actions of inocents
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because is legal the people
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because it is free representation for those accused of crimes
The use of public defenders should be mandatory because it is unethical to allow people to buy their way to a better trial outcome.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory because it would encourage more of the best law students to become public defenders, if they want to be defense attorneys.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory because it would end the two-tier system where some people get excellent private defenders and some get low quality public defenders.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory because it would lead to better public defenders for all.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because nobody deserves preferential treatment.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because not everyone can afford to get the support they may need
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because not everyone can afford to hire an attorney
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because not everyone has the money to hire the best legal team to defend them, causing a discrepancy in the justice system.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory because some people don't have money for a lawyer and this would help those that don't
the use of public defenders should be mandatory for porr people
the use of public defenders should be mandatory for those that cannot afford an attorney. they ensure the defendant gets a fair trial.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory in order to create a more equal playing field for all accused.