Topic: We should ban private military companies
private military companies do not all follow the rules of the country
private military companies do not have the same oversight as the armed forces so they can do what they want and this can lead to exploitation, profiteering and mistreatment of prisoners
private military companies do not have to go through governmental red tape to spend money for training and equipment
private military companies do not operate to the same code of conduct as regular forces thus could commit acts that could be viewed as war crimes.
private military companies do not operate under the normal rules of engagement and are sometimes linked to civilian deaths
private military companies do some of the work our soldiers do so they can concentrate on more important roles
private military companies earn their profits from war.  they do not work for a country but for whatever individuals hire them  there really is not a good oversight for what these companies do.
private military companies encourage violence and should be banned
private military companies fill a void in the security and protection of people and property. the can operate in a professional manner and assist persons and companies in protecting life and property.
private military companies give rise to some unethical practices as they are not under the same scrutiny as government military.
private military companies have a role in the armed forces, especially at a time when budgets and personnel are being reduced
private military companies have an incentive to extend the conflict to keep their business going.
private military companies have no controls on them and can perform actions that are akin to murder.
private military companies have no governmental controls and can attack people in their own country.
private military companies have no governmental controls and can do more harm then good.
private military companies have no oversight and thus can commit atrocities with no repercussions.
private military companies have the great purpose of serving in areas where no one else wants to.
Private military companies have their bottom line as a priority rather than the safety of the country.
private military companies have their own agendas and are not always acting in our country's best interest.
private military companies help bring down the cost of military action by our government.
private military companies hire dedicated people to become soldiers; they are likely more skilled than the kids we send out onto the battleground now.
private military companies is bad for the military where spies and stealers pathway
Private military companies lack oversight and accountability. It is too dangerous to have a military bound to serve who pays it versus the ethical framework of serving the public good.
Private military companies lack the principles and morality of legislated military and are more prone to commits war crimes.
private military companies make a profit off of fighting and war.  they will go wherever they are paid to fight.  they do not fight for a cause but for a paycheck.