Topic: We should abolish the three-strikes laws
We should abolish the three-strikes laws because they remove judicial discretion to take circumstances into account in sentencing.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws because they were created to target African Americans, and harm that community disproportionately.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because we are giving criminals too many chances to continue doing crime.
we should abolish the three-strikes laws becayuse sentencing should take into account the circumstances of the crime, the character of the criminal, and the amount of harm caused by the crime
we should abolish the three-strikes laws since this means that young adults under 25 who are incapable of making fully informed decisions  are locked away for life in prison
we should abolish them, people can get locked up for a long time for three little petty crimes.
we should abolish three strikes as it has had an horrific effect on social groups whose menfolk are in jail for life for trivial offenses and this produces more societial problems than it fixes.
we should because everyone deserves to start again and if the third offence is something minor like dropping a cigarette it is ridiculous that they could spend longer in prison than something more serious.
we should continue to support the three-strikes law because one offense is a boo=boo, the 2nd they obviously din't learn, so throw the book at them for the 3 time around.
we should get rid of the three strikes law because it's expensive to house prisoners for life and it does not deter crime.
we should get rid of the three-strikes law since it hasn't shown to be effective in deterring crime.
we should have strong laws that send strong messages to criminals
we should not abolish the three strikes law since this would promote lawlessness and would make our society a dangerous one to live in.
we should not abolish the three-strikes law because it is a way to help rehabilitate criminals.
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because a criminal deserves to be punished.
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because omeone who has committed three felonies is not likely to reform
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because people who are repeat offenders do not need to be on the street where the temptation to commit yet more crime is ever present.
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because sometime people near from their mistakes after they make enough of them
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because sometimes people learn from their mistakes and change
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because the criminal deserves what they did and justice must be done unto them
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws because the criminal will continue repeating the same crime again without fear and they may committing serious crime and by this law perhaps they may repent