Topic: We should ban private military companies
private military companies are a useful tool.
private military companies are accessible to all, providing security and security measures that are currently not accessible to all.
private military companies are around to make a profit and may do things that are dangerous in order to cut expenses
private military companies are basically soldiers for hire, driven by money and nothing else.
private military companies are benefits for society because they are not inclined
private military companies are dangerous as their neutrality cannot be guaranteed. they may be open to counter offers for their services.
private military companies are dangerous.  they are nothing more than mercenaries following the whims of their boss.
private military companies are dangerous.  they fight for their bosses' interests, not the interest of the country.
private military companies are doing it for profit only and not because they believe in the cause
private military companies are good for supplying security services to high profile individuals
private military companies are in it for the financial gain and does not adhere to the morals of civilian casualties.
Private military companies are just profiting on war and conflict. The company owners make loads of money and just send out people as cannon fodder for money.
private military companies are largely unregulated, and providing muscle for financial gain fosters corruption and undemocratic process - it is the survival of the powerful over the poor, oppressed.
Private military companies are less likely to exercise proper discipline or follow ethical rules of engagement in warfare.
private military companies are little better than mercenaries and should be treated in the same way
private military companies are made up of soldiers that are probably much better trained than the kids we currently send to military.
private military companies are mercenaries who can harm our society for greed and we don't need them
private military companies are more efficient and better trained than the government run military.
private military companies are more efficient than government run
private military companies are more likely to give out personal information.
private military companies are necessary for the protection of people against tyrannical governments.
private military companies are needed to do the work that our soldiers should not do
private military companies are needed to provide security when the military can not do the job
private military companies are no different to weapons manufacturers. they provide a necessary service for the military.
private military companies are not regulated by government and their code of conduct might be violating human rights
private military companies are not subject to as much oversight as the actual military. additionally, they are costly and a waste of taxpayer money.
private military companies are not trained to handle situations like military and can be dangerous to themselves and others. the should be banned for the safety of all.