Topic: We should ban targeted killing
targeted killing is a useful way for the state to control the population
targeted killing is a way for leaders to murder those they want to murder
targeted killing is a way to end possible political nightmares before they escalate and become even more dangerous.  our #1 priority is the safety of our people, as it should be.
targeted killing is aimed at one target saving innocent people.
targeted killing is almost always carried out with drone strikes. there is no way of knowing if you're for sure hitting your intended target. many innocent people are killed due to that uncertainty.
targeted killing is an effective way to eliminate threats to the united states.
targeted killing is an efficient way to stop a future escalation of violence into war and so it is necessary and to ban targeted killing would be to condemn the future to war
targeted killing is an essential tactic for the elimination of known terrorists which saves hundreds even thousands of innocent lives. because of targeted killing the majority of isis have now been wiped out.
targeted killing is an expensive waste of government resources
targeted killing is an immoral act, a government procured murder, that should not continue.
targeted killing is an unfair form of killing and is no more than assassination
targeted killing is assassination and is morally and ethically wrong and should be banned.
targeted killing is basically a form of assassination which is the same as murder.
targeted killing is difficult to control or oversee as it can be authorised by governments without the knowledge of its citizens.
targeted killing is effective in surgically removing bad actors responsible for terrorizing the populace of their resident nations.
targeted killing is equivocal to murder, whereas knowing the location of a target would allow for capture and imprisonment rather than death and should be banned.
targeted killing is essentially murder outside of the judicial system, and governments shouldn't be able to act in such a provocative fashion unlawfully.
targeted killing is helpful to take out threats without waging all out war. it saves lives by preventing unnecessary causalities and collateral damage that are the byproducts of full on war.
targeted killing is immoral and violent
targeted killing is inhumane and should be banned.
targeted killing is inhumane, there should be no killing without  aggression inflicted and then only in self protection. in addition targeted killing cannot guarantee that innocent civilians will be unharmed.
targeted killing is just a fancy word for murder and it should not be allowed.
targeted killing is just state condoned murder and should be abolished.  persons should be captured and tried, not murdered, and innocent by standers should not be harmed by missed targets.
Targeted killing is just unlawful execution by another name, it is illegal and should be banned.
targeted killing is like hiring a hitman except the government gets away with it.
targeted killing is morally wrong and should be banned.