Topic: We should ban targeted killing
a government should do whatever it needs to to protect its security
a successful targeted killing can prevent a war or other deaths and as such, should be a tool at our disposal.
a well-executed targeted killing is an important tool to prevent war and attacks and there's no reason to ban them.
all human beings, no matter how cruel our actions are here on earth, we have the right to life
an approval of selective killings can trigger a war between the community, that's why i do not support selective assassinations
any killing is wrong even if done under the premise of a political killing done for the benefit of the people.  we should not be involved in such a practice.
assassinations are an essential tool of national defense and espionage and allow countries to avoid armed conflict.
banning targeted killing would even the playing field for the target because entire governments against an individual isn’t a fair fight.
banning targeting killing could lead to dangerous individuals getting away.
based on the reason for targeted killing, in some cases this does make sense.  if a person is a serial murderer, and he is caught in gun fire, this type of killing of the murderer is warranted.
by targeting killing there is always innocent civilians victims as well and that should be abandoned and banned.
by using targeted killing the government can potentially save hundreds of lives, for example if a terrorist is targeted.
certain places in the world are lawless and the only way to stop dangerous individuals in these circumstances is by targeted killing.
certain species are reproducing out of control and need to have their numbers reduced
Countries that target another country's leader to kill should be banned.  Target killing is just another term for murder and murder is illegal,
Dangerous terrorists who are really hard to catch cause lot of destruction and deaths. Only targeted killing can save us from more deaths caused by them
definitely serial murders must be prohibited from the legal and legal point of view by the simple reason to respect the life of the other and the right to life
elective killings should not be banned because they are part of political strategies to end a confrontation and even avoid wars.
even the government should not have the power to kill anyone they wish.
every effort should be made to arrest and put on trial a suspect rather than assassinate. as this fits the western concept of rule of law
evil has penetrated society, and there are times when there is no other way out to eradicate it than to resort to force, evil can not be overcome with discourses, it is necessary to fight fire with fire.
for me, i do not want terrorists to be around my neighborhood. i'm completely denied that decision
governments in this way seek to prioritize their needs and whims at the time of reaching power
governments shoudl be allowed to target kill if there is a threat of terrorism.
governments should do whatever they need to do to defend their security
how else would we take down specific individuals who pose enormous threats to our nation, as bin laden.