Topic: The use of public defenders should be mandatory
The use of public defenders should be mandatory in order to make wealthy people invested in the success of the public defender system.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory is fundamental of peace in people
the use of public defenders should be mandatory since each person should have equal representation and poor people cannot afford an expensive lawyer.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory since some people can not afford to pay a regular lawyer.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory so that both parties have access to state resources in criminal trials.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory so that every person is represented on the same level as the next.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory so that public defenders are no long stigmatized, which will make them more effective.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory so that the trial system can be streamlined with more consistent defense practices.
the use of public defenders should be mandatory then everyone would get a fair trial
The use of public defenders should be mandatory to ensure that everyone has fair representation and money cannot give someone an advantage.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory to ensure that there is a level playing field for everyone in a given case.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory, so that corporations accused of criminal misconduct have the same resources that an individual would.
The use of public defenders should not be mandatory as people should be able to bring in specialist and experienced defenders if they wish.
The use of public defenders should not be mandatory as the public system is already over-subscribed and this would just create further unnecessary burden and demand.
the use of public defenders should not be mandatory as you might get a bad one and then regret it for the rest of your life
the use of public defenders should not be mandatory because a lot of them are not well versed in law.
the use of public defenders should not be mandatory because a person should have the right to pay within their means any representative they wish.
the use of public defenders should not be mandatory because every person gets to choose how they want to be represented.
the use of public defenders should not be mandatory because everyone has the right to a lawyer of their choosing as long as they have the money for it.
The use of public defenders should not be mandatory because it is unfair to force people to rely on the state for their defense when the state is also prosecuting them.
The use of public defenders should not be mandatory because it unfairly discriminates against private defense attorneys.
The use of public defenders should not be mandatory because it will discourage law students from going into criminal litigation, since the pay is much lower for public defenders than private.
The use of public defenders should not be mandatory because it would require a large increase in state taxes to cover the massively increased cost of trials.