Topic: We should abolish the three-strikes laws
there aren't enough jobs for everyone, so we need three strikes laws to keep poor people in line when they can't find jobs, otherwise they'll commit even more crimes
there is no discerning between a serious crime and a minor one
there is no evidence that the three-strikes laws deters crime
there is no reason the three-strikes law is still in effect, it has shown no real benefits for society as a whole.
there needds to be clear legislation and deterrents in pace to ensure social responsibility
these laws are too harsh and unfairly punish many young people who would likely grow up to commit no further crime. a few mistakes made in youth should not result in life in prison.
these laws protect society from people who cannot be rehabilitated and will continue to harm others until taken out of society. without them those individuals can continue acts of violence indefinitely.
they did the crime knowing the penalty so should serve the sentence.
they laws don't stop crime, they just punish people harder.
this is a good law to protect us from repeat offenders
this law does not make sense for minor offenses.
this law has lessened the overall crime rate in the united states by not taking any more risks and continually releasing criminals
this law is convoluted and gives undeserving criminals harsh sentences for minimal crimes like theft
this law is good at keeping people who constantly break the law off the street.
this law is good for young people who would learn their lesson and become good adults
this law is unfair to people committing small offenses that do not deserve to be put away for life.
this law is unfair to those who's third crime is minor and thought should be given to changing the criteria of the third crime.
this law keeps communities safe by not letting criminals run rampant with only slaps on the wrist
this law keeps communities safe from career criminals
this law sentences people on crimes they committed in the past as well as the present, which is unfair
this system is so unfair as people who commit one big crime can end up serving less time than those who commit three small crimes.
those who have committed minor offenses will be forced to spend life in prison.
Thousands of lives are ruined by life sentences for crimes as minor as shoplifting.
three is an arbitrary number and may not be appropriate in some instances or for some crimes
three minor offence should be punished accordingly
three small crimes shouldn't put some away for a long time
three strike law are dated criminals facing life sentences would have nothing to lose and therefore could be more violent
three strike law is a deterrent for criminals as their sentence will be harsher
three strike law is just another loophole in the rule of law that allows criminals to roam free without been purnished for there sins
three strike laws can cause wrongful life sentences
three strike laws can cause young people to be put away for life without a chance to straight out their life
three strike laws can help lower crime rates
three strike laws can help lower crimes because they know they will get more jail time for repeated offenses