Topic: We should ban private military companies
Private military companies provide invaluable assistance by attending to the more mundane tasks when and where it's required,  this allows the main state military to concentrate on the most difficult tasks.
private military companies provide security for many areas in the country
private military companies provide services that enhance security for american military and help fuel the economy as a bonus.
private military companies provide valuable security services, and can act as an overflow unit taking pressure from the regular army formations.
private military companies provide valuable services in areas that are not served by enough military personnel
private military companies provide valuable training for national military and also provide security for people in danger. everyone has the right to spend their own money as they wish including on security.
private military companies provide violence - or threat of violence - for money, are poorly regulated and subject to endless accusation of corruption and bribery.
Private military companies provide weapons and other items needed by the military, without them, they would be ill equipped.
private military companies put civilian lives in danger
private military companies rarely actually kill anyone or operate in the manner of the official military. they are used for protection without needing tax payer dollars.
private military companies receive government funds without sufficient government oversight.
private military companies save the united states money.
private military companies sell violence and intimidation to the highest bidder, which flies in the face of keeping democratic peace.
private military companies serve a purpose especially in war torn areas and a lot of military veterans
Private military companies should be banned as they are not obliged to follow the strict rules of engagement that the military must which results in abuse of civilians.
private military companies should be banned as they are not subject to military laws
private military companies should be banned as they have committed heinous acts against innocent people in places like iraq.
private military companies should be banned because it is immoral to make money off of war
private military companies should be banned because only governments should be in the business of running military operations.
private military companies should be banned because these jobs depend on government funding
private military companies should be banned because they are taking the function of the us military and there are many things that only the government should be responsible for.
private military companies should be banned because when it comes to the military that our taxes support then everything should be public.
private military companies should be banned they often act as mercenaries and cant be regulated
Private military companies should not be banned as they do valuable work in the theatres of coflict in areas which,  because of cost cutting, the armed forces are not a position to provide.