Topic: We should ban private military companies
the government cannot keep up with the supply and demand of our military and banning private military companies would prove to be detrimental by creating shortage of supplies.
the government should not hold the monopoly on the military and private military companies should not be banned, as it is a free world enterprise.
the military is the last thing that should be profit driven, reliance on such companies can invoke catastrophe.
the military should be a part and controlled by the government
the military should be run by the federal government so it can defend this country without private biases.
the military should be wholly the domain of governments, because they provide for national defense. a private military company is 100-percent for profit, making them less favorable to true national defense.
the military should keep all their intelligence in house so i think private military companies should be banned.
the neutrality of private military companies cannot be guaranteed so they are a threat to national security.
the operating personnel of these companies has been working for the army of the nation. this type of company keeps them active and always ready to defend if necessary.
the pay is good and they use new technolodgy
the private military companies are owned by elites who bet on wars to obtain millions in profits
the private military companies represent a risk to the security of the nation
the skills that develop here should be used to defend and protect the nation not other capricious purposes
the state can not have exclusivity in the creation of weapons, leaving aside private capital as a source of technological innovations for our defense
the world thrives on free enterprise.  allowing these types of companies is simply allowing a business to thrive, which is a good thing.
there are fewer american casualties when using private military companies.
there are not enough safe-guards that oversee private military companies from producing under-par products and they should be banned.
there is less transparency and accountability when using private military companies.
there is no argument against it, it is free choice
there is no need to ban private military companies because they simply are capitalizing on something that is needed in the world
there is too little regulation for private military companies which can lead to mentally unstable ex-servicement joining their ranks.
There's too many controversies surrounding companies using private military contractors.   These are not professional people in the business.   Too many deaths are associated with these groups.
these companies make millions in a private sector and they are not necessary.
these companies provide the additional security we might need.
these pmcs are bound by their own rules and can cause trouble
they are basically mercenaries and often violate international law.
they are not held accountable in the same way regular armies are. it has been reported that some of these companies don't follow the rules of engagement thus committing crimes.
they are regulated differently and might not act according to standard rules