Topic: We should ban targeted killing
I believe everyone has the right to a fair trial before any sentence should be carried out.
I believe this is acceptable when there is a tyrant or despot who is a real threat and it saves the taxpayer money rather than putting them in prison.
i do not support that decision is that without them there would be many terrorists is a measure that helps a lot to this society
i think that we should ban targeted killing because is safaty and secure
i think that we shouldn´t ban targeted killing because is dangerous
i think that we shouldn't  ban targeted killing for our security
if a group of people are a threat to our welfare it should be allowed to do whatever necessary to eliminate the problem.
if someone has done enough crime to be on a targeted kill list they don’t deserve to be spared and therefore it shouldn’t be banned.
if the leader of a country is killing people that he chooses because they don't follow his beliefs sometimes removing him is the only choice and targeted killing is the only possibility
if they can kill someone who has done or is planning on doing something to harm americans then why not target them and kill them
if we see it on the other hand selective killings of defenseless people i see it as bad because we are talking about selective but for a person who wins his death.
if you call it targeted killing it is still murder which is illegal
in a certain way, the selective assassination in politics is beneficial for countries that have this, as a means to alleviate their problems
in certain circumstances it's impossible to detain highly dangerous individuals who pose a threat, the only option is targeted killing.
in most targeted killing there is always innocent people death and knowing that should be banned.
in order to prevent further terrorism sometimes you have to just kill the ringleader
in some cases where all attempts to capture someone has gone wrong the only option left is to kill them before they can hurt more people and in these cases it shouldn’t be banned.
innocent people could be killed as a result of this.
it cannot be morally right to allow targeted killing as this would make us no better than the perpetrator.
it cannot be morally right to operate targeting killing as this makes us no better than the person being targeted.
it helps to get rid of terrorists and other dangerous individuals
it is important to put an end to these selective murders, carried out by mercenaries hired by any field, be it political or economic.
it is really just another name for assassination
it is sometimes necessary to act in a preemptive manner with cases of truly dangerous terrorists and national threats - reliance on the normal extradition process is too slow, and can cost lives.
It is sometimes necessary when it is impossible to gain the necessary proof of guilt for trial in a Court of Law or the terrorist is based in another country to sanction a targeted killing.
it is the same as assassination and it can also kill innocent people.
it is unfair to assassinate others as a surprise and out of battlefield.
it isn't right to take a life of anyone