aveni-ai/aveni-bench-tat-qa huggingface dataset:
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017: The components of net periodic pension cost other than the service cost component are included in other, net within other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. In 2019, we purchased a group annuity contract to transfer the pension benefit obligations and annuity administration for a select group of retirees or their beneficiaries to an annuity provider. Upon issuance of the group annuity contract, the pension benefit obligation of $24.4 million for approximately 500 participants was irrevocably transferred to the annuity provider. The purchase of the group annuity was funded directly by the assets of the Pension Plans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a pension settlement charge of $6.7 million as a result of the transfer of the pension liability to the annuity provider and other lump sum payments made during the year. In 2018 and 2017, the Retirement Plan was amended to freeze benefit accruals under the cash balance benefit plan for certain participants under collective bargaining agreements. As a result of these amendments, we recognized a pre-tax curtailment gain of $1.2 million and $1.3 million as a component of net periodic pension cost during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(In thousands)	2019	2018	2017

Service cost	$ 50	$ 5,809	$ 3,055

Interest cost	30,327	28,870	21,882

Expected return on plan assets	(34,627)	(38,640)	(28,459)

Amortization of:

Net actuarial loss	2,890	6,110	6,244

Prior service cost (credit)	123	(204)	(316)

Plan curtailment	—	(1,156)	(1,337)

Plan settlement	6,726	94	17

Net periodic pension cost	$ 5,489	$ 883	$ 1,086

Question: What was the service cost increase / (decrease) from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -5759
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017: The components of net periodic pension cost other than the service cost component are included in other, net within other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. In 2019, we purchased a group annuity contract to transfer the pension benefit obligations and annuity administration for a select group of retirees or their beneficiaries to an annuity provider. Upon issuance of the group annuity contract, the pension benefit obligation of $24.4 million for approximately 500 participants was irrevocably transferred to the annuity provider. The purchase of the group annuity was funded directly by the assets of the Pension Plans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a pension settlement charge of $6.7 million as a result of the transfer of the pension liability to the annuity provider and other lump sum payments made during the year. In 2018 and 2017, the Retirement Plan was amended to freeze benefit accruals under the cash balance benefit plan for certain participants under collective bargaining agreements. As a result of these amendments, we recognized a pre-tax curtailment gain of $1.2 million and $1.3 million as a component of net periodic pension cost during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(In thousands)	2019	2018	2017

Service cost	$ 50	$ 5,809	$ 3,055

Interest cost	30,327	28,870	21,882

Expected return on plan assets	(34,627)	(38,640)	(28,459)

Amortization of:

Net actuarial loss	2,890	6,110	6,244

Prior service cost (credit)	123	(204)	(316)

Plan curtailment	—	(1,156)	(1,337)

Plan settlement	6,726	94	17

Net periodic pension cost	$ 5,489	$ 883	$ 1,086

Question: What was the average interest cost for 2017-2019?
Answer: 27026.33
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017: The components of net periodic pension cost other than the service cost component are included in other, net within other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. In 2019, we purchased a group annuity contract to transfer the pension benefit obligations and annuity administration for a select group of retirees or their beneficiaries to an annuity provider. Upon issuance of the group annuity contract, the pension benefit obligation of $24.4 million for approximately 500 participants was irrevocably transferred to the annuity provider. The purchase of the group annuity was funded directly by the assets of the Pension Plans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a pension settlement charge of $6.7 million as a result of the transfer of the pension liability to the annuity provider and other lump sum payments made during the year. In 2018 and 2017, the Retirement Plan was amended to freeze benefit accruals under the cash balance benefit plan for certain participants under collective bargaining agreements. As a result of these amendments, we recognized a pre-tax curtailment gain of $1.2 million and $1.3 million as a component of net periodic pension cost during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(In thousands)	2019	2018	2017

Service cost	$ 50	$ 5,809	$ 3,055

Interest cost	30,327	28,870	21,882

Expected return on plan assets	(34,627)	(38,640)	(28,459)

Amortization of:

Net actuarial loss	2,890	6,110	6,244

Prior service cost (credit)	123	(204)	(316)

Plan curtailment	—	(1,156)	(1,337)

Plan settlement	6,726	94	17

Net periodic pension cost	$ 5,489	$ 883	$ 1,086

Question: What was the average net actuarial loss for 2017-2019?
Answer: 5081.33
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.

Name	Target ($)	Cap (%)	Net Sales (%)	Adjusted Operating Income (%)	Strategic Objectives (%)	Corporate Governance (%)	Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)

Barry Litwin	1,113,750	111	20	60	18	4	0

Thomas Clark	225,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Robert Dooley	615,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Eric Lerner	300,900	150	0	0	0	0	100

Manoj Shetty	241,535	150	0	0	0	0	100

Question: What is the incentive compensation received by Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds respectively?
Answer: 0
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.

Name	Target ($)	Cap (%)	Net Sales (%)	Adjusted Operating Income (%)	Strategic Objectives (%)	Corporate Governance (%)	Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)

Barry Litwin	1,113,750	111	20	60	18	4	0

Thomas Clark	225,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Robert Dooley	615,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Eric Lerner	300,900	150	0	0	0	0	100

Manoj Shetty	241,535	150	0	0	0	0	100

Question: What is the non-equity incentive target amount for Barry Litwin and Thomas Clark respectively?
Answer: 1,113,750; 225,000
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.

Name	Target ($)	Cap (%)	Net Sales (%)	Adjusted Operating Income (%)	Strategic Objectives (%)	Corporate Governance (%)	Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)

Barry Litwin	1,113,750	111	20	60	18	4	0

Thomas Clark	225,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Robert Dooley	615,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Eric Lerner	300,900	150	0	0	0	0	100

Manoj Shetty	241,535	150	0	0	0	0	100

Question: What is the non-equity incentive target amount for Robert Dooley and Eric Lerner respectively?
Answer: 615,000; 300,900
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.

Name	Target ($)	Cap (%)	Net Sales (%)	Adjusted Operating Income (%)	Strategic Objectives (%)	Corporate Governance (%)	Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)

Barry Litwin	1,113,750	111	20	60	18	4	0

Thomas Clark	225,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Robert Dooley	615,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Eric Lerner	300,900	150	0	0	0	0	100

Manoj Shetty	241,535	150	0	0	0	0	100

Question: What is the total non-equity incentive target amounts of all 5 NEOs in 2019?
Answer: 2496185
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.

Name	Target ($)	Cap (%)	Net Sales (%)	Adjusted Operating Income (%)	Strategic Objectives (%)	Corporate Governance (%)	Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)

Barry Litwin	1,113,750	111	20	60	18	4	0

Thomas Clark	225,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Robert Dooley	615,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Eric Lerner	300,900	150	0	0	0	0	100

Manoj Shetty	241,535	150	0	0	0	0	100

Question: What is the total percentage net sales allocated under the 2019 Plan for Barry Litwin and Thomas Clark?
Answer: 20
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.

Name	Target ($)	Cap (%)	Net Sales (%)	Adjusted Operating Income (%)	Strategic Objectives (%)	Corporate Governance (%)	Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)

Barry Litwin	1,113,750	111	20	60	18	4	0

Thomas Clark	225,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Robert Dooley	615,000	150	0	0	0	0	100

Eric Lerner	300,900	150	0	0	0	0	100

Manoj Shetty	241,535	150	0	0	0	0	100

Question: What percentage of Barry Litwin's target amount under the 2019 plan is Robert Dooley's target amount?
Answer: 55.22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

As of December 31,

2019	2018

Land and land improvements	$1,095	$1,136

Buildings and improvements	68,350	70,522

Machinery and equipment	224,312	231,619

Less: Accumulated depreciation	(188,719)	(203,876)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$105,038	$99,401

Question: Which years does the table provide information for the company's Property, plant and equipment?
Answer: 2019; 2018
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

As of December 31,

2019	2018

Land and land improvements	$1,095	$1,136

Buildings and improvements	68,350	70,522

Machinery and equipment	224,312	231,619

Less: Accumulated depreciation	(188,719)	(203,876)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$105,038	$99,401

Question: What was the amount of buildings and improvements in 2019?
Answer: 68,350
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

As of December 31,

2019	2018

Land and land improvements	$1,095	$1,136

Buildings and improvements	68,350	70,522

Machinery and equipment	224,312	231,619

Less: Accumulated depreciation	(188,719)	(203,876)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$105,038	$99,401

Question: What was the amount of Machinery and equipment in 2018?
Answer: 231,619
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

As of December 31,

2019	2018

Land and land improvements	$1,095	$1,136

Buildings and improvements	68,350	70,522

Machinery and equipment	224,312	231,619

Less: Accumulated depreciation	(188,719)	(203,876)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$105,038	$99,401

Question: How many years did the amount of Machinery and equipment exceed $200,000 thousand?
Answer: 2
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

As of December 31,

2019	2018

Land and land improvements	$1,095	$1,136

Buildings and improvements	68,350	70,522

Machinery and equipment	224,312	231,619

Less: Accumulated depreciation	(188,719)	(203,876)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$105,038	$99,401

Question: What was the change in the amount of Buildings and Improvements between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -2172
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

As of December 31,

2019	2018

Land and land improvements	$1,095	$1,136

Buildings and improvements	68,350	70,522

Machinery and equipment	224,312	231,619

Less: Accumulated depreciation	(188,719)	(203,876)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$105,038	$99,401

Question: What was the percentage change in the the total net property, plant and equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 5.67
Retail TV (1) As of January 1, 2019, we are no longer reporting wholesale subscribers in our TV subscriber base reflecting our focus on the retail market. Consequently, we restated previously reported 2018 subscribers for comparability. Retail IPTV net subscriber activations decreased by 17.4% in 2019, compared to last year, resulting from the impact of a maturing Fibe TV market, slower new service footprint growth and greater substitution of traditional TV services with OTT services, partly offset by higher Alt TV activations. Retail satellite TV net customer losses improved by 4.3% compared to 2018, attributable to lower deactivations, reflecting a more mature subscriber base geographically better-suited for satellite TV service. Total retail TV net subscriber activations (IPTV and satellite TV combined) decreased by 71.9% in 2019, compared to last year, due to lower IPTV net activations, moderated by fewer satellite TV net losses. Retail IPTV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,767,182, up 5.5% from 1,675,706 subscribers reported at the end of 2018. Retail satellite TV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,005,282, down 7.8% from 1,090,705 subscribers at the end of last year. Total retail TV subscribers (IPTV and satellite TV combined) at December 31, 2019 were 2,772,464, representing a 0.2% increase since the end of 2018.

2019	2018	CHANGE	% CHANGE

Retail net subscriber activations (losses) (1)	6,053	21,559	(15,506)	(71.9%)

IPTV	91,476	110,790	(19,314)	(17.4%)

Satellite	(85,423)	(89,231)	3,808	4.3%

Total retail subscribers (1)	2,772,464	2,766,411	6,053	0.2%

IPTV	1,767,182	1,675,706	91,476	5.5%

Satellite	1,005,282	1,090,705	(85,423)	(7.8%)

Question: What was the percentage change in the retail satellite TV net customer losses from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 4.3%
Retail TV (1) As of January 1, 2019, we are no longer reporting wholesale subscribers in our TV subscriber base reflecting our focus on the retail market. Consequently, we restated previously reported 2018 subscribers for comparability. Retail IPTV net subscriber activations decreased by 17.4% in 2019, compared to last year, resulting from the impact of a maturing Fibe TV market, slower new service footprint growth and greater substitution of traditional TV services with OTT services, partly offset by higher Alt TV activations. Retail satellite TV net customer losses improved by 4.3% compared to 2018, attributable to lower deactivations, reflecting a more mature subscriber base geographically better-suited for satellite TV service. Total retail TV net subscriber activations (IPTV and satellite TV combined) decreased by 71.9% in 2019, compared to last year, due to lower IPTV net activations, moderated by fewer satellite TV net losses. Retail IPTV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,767,182, up 5.5% from 1,675,706 subscribers reported at the end of 2018. Retail satellite TV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,005,282, down 7.8% from 1,090,705 subscribers at the end of last year. Total retail TV subscribers (IPTV and satellite TV combined) at December 31, 2019 were 2,772,464, representing a 0.2% increase since the end of 2018.

2019	2018	CHANGE	% CHANGE

Retail net subscriber activations (losses) (1)	6,053	21,559	(15,506)	(71.9%)

IPTV	91,476	110,790	(19,314)	(17.4%)

Satellite	(85,423)	(89,231)	3,808	4.3%

Total retail subscribers (1)	2,772,464	2,766,411	6,053	0.2%

IPTV	1,767,182	1,675,706	91,476	5.5%

Satellite	1,005,282	1,090,705	(85,423)	(7.8%)

Question: What resulted in the change in the retail IPTV net subscriber activations in 2019?
Answer: the impact of a maturing Fibe TV market, slower new service footprint growth and greater substitution of traditional TV services with OTT services, partly offset by higher Alt TV activations
Retail TV (1) As of January 1, 2019, we are no longer reporting wholesale subscribers in our TV subscriber base reflecting our focus on the retail market. Consequently, we restated previously reported 2018 subscribers for comparability. Retail IPTV net subscriber activations decreased by 17.4% in 2019, compared to last year, resulting from the impact of a maturing Fibe TV market, slower new service footprint growth and greater substitution of traditional TV services with OTT services, partly offset by higher Alt TV activations. Retail satellite TV net customer losses improved by 4.3% compared to 2018, attributable to lower deactivations, reflecting a more mature subscriber base geographically better-suited for satellite TV service. Total retail TV net subscriber activations (IPTV and satellite TV combined) decreased by 71.9% in 2019, compared to last year, due to lower IPTV net activations, moderated by fewer satellite TV net losses. Retail IPTV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,767,182, up 5.5% from 1,675,706 subscribers reported at the end of 2018. Retail satellite TV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,005,282, down 7.8% from 1,090,705 subscribers at the end of last year. Total retail TV subscribers (IPTV and satellite TV combined) at December 31, 2019 were 2,772,464, representing a 0.2% increase since the end of 2018.

2019	2018	CHANGE	% CHANGE

Retail net subscriber activations (losses) (1)	6,053	21,559	(15,506)	(71.9%)

IPTV	91,476	110,790	(19,314)	(17.4%)

Satellite	(85,423)	(89,231)	3,808	4.3%

Total retail subscribers (1)	2,772,464	2,766,411	6,053	0.2%

IPTV	1,767,182	1,675,706	91,476	5.5%

Satellite	1,005,282	1,090,705	(85,423)	(7.8%)

Question: What was the change in the total retail subscribers?
Answer: 6,053
Retail TV (1) As of January 1, 2019, we are no longer reporting wholesale subscribers in our TV subscriber base reflecting our focus on the retail market. Consequently, we restated previously reported 2018 subscribers for comparability. Retail IPTV net subscriber activations decreased by 17.4% in 2019, compared to last year, resulting from the impact of a maturing Fibe TV market, slower new service footprint growth and greater substitution of traditional TV services with OTT services, partly offset by higher Alt TV activations. Retail satellite TV net customer losses improved by 4.3% compared to 2018, attributable to lower deactivations, reflecting a more mature subscriber base geographically better-suited for satellite TV service. Total retail TV net subscriber activations (IPTV and satellite TV combined) decreased by 71.9% in 2019, compared to last year, due to lower IPTV net activations, moderated by fewer satellite TV net losses. Retail IPTV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,767,182, up 5.5% from 1,675,706 subscribers reported at the end of 2018. Retail satellite TV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,005,282, down 7.8% from 1,090,705 subscribers at the end of last year. Total retail TV subscribers (IPTV and satellite TV combined) at December 31, 2019 were 2,772,464, representing a 0.2% increase since the end of 2018.

2019	2018	CHANGE	% CHANGE

Retail net subscriber activations (losses) (1)	6,053	21,559	(15,506)	(71.9%)

IPTV	91,476	110,790	(19,314)	(17.4%)

Satellite	(85,423)	(89,231)	3,808	4.3%

Total retail subscribers (1)	2,772,464	2,766,411	6,053	0.2%

IPTV	1,767,182	1,675,706	91,476	5.5%

Satellite	1,005,282	1,090,705	(85,423)	(7.8%)

Question: What is the change in the number of IPTV retail subscribers in 2019?
Answer: 91476