aveni-ai/aveni-bench-tat-hqa huggingface dataset:
The following are the significant assumptions adopted in measuring the Company’s pension and other benefit obligations: For certain Canadian post-retirement plans the above trend rates are applicable for 2019 to 2024 which will increase linearly to 4.75% in 2029 and grading down to an ultimate rate of 3.57% per annum in 2040 and thereafter. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>As at December 31,</td><td>Pension 2019</td><td>Other 2019</td><td>Pension 2018</td><td>Other 2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Actuarial benefit obligation</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>3.20%</td><td>2.95% to 3.20%</td><td>3.80%</td><td>3.80% to 4.00%</td></tr> <tr><td>Benefit costs for the year ended</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>3.90%</td><td>3.90% to 4.00%</td><td>3.60%</td><td>3.25% to 3.60%</td></tr> <tr><td>Future salary growth</td><td>2.50%</td><td>N/A</td><td>2.50%</td><td>N/A</td></tr> <tr><td>Health care cost trend rate</td><td>N/A</td><td>3.49% to 5.49%</td><td>N/A</td><td>4.50%</td></tr> <tr><td>Other medical trend rates</td><td>N/A</td><td>4.00% to 4.56%</td><td>N/A</td><td>4.50%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the total pension discount rate for actuarial benefit obligation for 2018 and 2019 if the total is decreased by 15%?
Answer: 5.95

Question: What would be the percentage change in the pension discount rate for actuarial benefit obligations between 2018 and 2019 if the 2019 value is doubled and then increased by 5%?
Answer: 7.6

Question: What would be the difference in future salary growth assumed under pension 2018 and 2019 if the assumption under pension 2019 is 3.70% instead?
Answer: 1.2
Cost of Revenue Cost of revenue increased by $15.3 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million increase in employee-related costs, which includes stock-based compensation, associated with our increased headcount from 128 employees as of December 31, 2017 to 173 employees as of December 31, 2018. The remaining increase was principally the result of a $7.0 million increase in hosting, software and messaging costs, a $0.6 million increase attributed to office related expenses to support revenue generating activities and a $0.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense attributable to our acquired intangible assets. Gross margin percentage decreased due to our continued investment in personnel and infrastructure to support our growth in revenue. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td></td><td>Change</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>$</td><td>%</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>(dollars in thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Cost of revenue</td><td>$ 46,810</td><td>$ 31,503</td><td>$ 15,307</td><td>48.6%</td></tr> <tr><td>Gross margin %</td><td>68%</td><td>70%</td><td></td><td></td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If cost of revenue in 2018 was 40,000 thousands, what would be the average value for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 35751.5

Question: If cost of revenue in 2018 was 35,000 thousands, in which year would the values be less than 40,000 thousands?
Answer: 2018, 2017

Question: If Gross margin in 2018 was 72%, what would be the change in value from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 2
Effective Income Tax Rate A reconciliation of the United States federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows: In 2019 and 2018 we had pre-tax losses of $19,573 and $25,403, respectively, which are available for carry forward to offset future taxable income. We made determinations to provide full valuation allowances for our net deferred tax assets at the end of 2019 and 2018, including NOL carryforwards generated during the years, based on our evaluation of positive and negative evidence, including our history of operating losses and the uncertainty of generating future taxable income that would enable us to realize our deferred tax. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year Ended</td><td>Year Ended</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>December 31, 2018</td><td>December 31, 2019</td></tr> <tr><td>United States federal statutory rate</td><td>21.00%</td><td>21.00%</td></tr> <tr><td>State taxes, net of federal benefit</td><td>1.99%</td><td>(0.01)%</td></tr> <tr><td>Valuation allowance</td><td>(21.96)%</td><td>(24.33)%</td></tr> <tr><td>Cumulative effect of accounting change</td><td>—</td><td>2.07%</td></tr> <tr><td>R&amp;D Credit</td><td>1.34%</td><td>1.53%</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>(0.38)%</td><td>(0.27)%</td></tr> <tr><td>Effective income tax rate</td><td>1.99%</td><td>(0.01)%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What was the 2019 percentage change in pre-tax losses if pre-tax losses in 2019 was $20,000?
Answer: -21.27

Question: What was the change in the United States federal statutory rate between 2018 and 2019 if the 2018 rate was 20.00%?
Answer: 1

Question: Which year has a higher amount of pre-tax losses if the pre-tax losses for 2019 was $29,573?
Answer: 2019
Note 26. Other Income (Expense) Other income (expense), net consisted of the following (in thousands): <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Years Ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign currency transaction gains(losses)</td><td>$(1,262)</td><td>$2,029</td><td>$(548)</td></tr> <tr><td>Gains (losses) on derivative instruments not designated as hedges</td><td>(674)</td><td>(1,751)</td><td>143</td></tr> <tr><td>Net investment gains (losses) on investments held in rabbi trust</td><td>2,379</td><td>(867)</td><td>1,619</td></tr> <tr><td>Other miscellaneous income (expense)</td><td>(857)</td><td>(1,659)</td><td>44</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$(414)</td><td>$(2,248)</td><td>$1,258</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In how many years would Other income , net be a negative value if the amount in 2019 was $414 thousand instead?
Answer: 1

Question: What would the overall change in Net investment gains on investments held in rabbi trust in 2019 from 2017 be if the amount in 2019 was $2,619 thousand instead?
Answer: 1000

Question: What would the overall percentage change in Net investment gains  on investments held in rabbi trust in 2019 from 2017 be if the amount in 2019 was $2,619 thousand instead?
Answer: 61.77
Performance Share Units The following table illustrates the number and WASP on date of award, and movements in, performance share units (“PSUs”) granted under the 2015 LTIP: PSUs vest on one vesting date following a three year vesting period which will comprise three financial years. The awards are divided into three equal parts which will each be subject to a separate annual performance condition linked to the financial performance of the Group. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year-ended 31 March 2019</td><td></td><td>Year-ended 31 March 2018</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Number</td><td>WASP</td><td>Number</td><td>WASP</td></tr> <tr><td>Performance share units</td><td>000’s</td><td>£ pence</td><td>000’s</td><td>£ pence</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding at the start of the year</td><td>7,546</td><td>269.65</td><td>6,024</td><td>219.41</td></tr> <tr><td>Awarded</td><td>1,721</td><td>506.74</td><td>1,719</td><td>440.50</td></tr> <tr><td>Forfeited</td><td>(2,234)</td><td>414.51</td><td>(197)</td><td>223.96</td></tr> <tr><td>Released</td><td>(2,949)</td><td>262.64</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding at the end of the year</td><td>4,084</td><td>295.41</td><td>7,546</td><td>269.65</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the number of PSUs awarded be larger if the number in 2019 was 1,711 thousand instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in the number of PSUs outstanding at the end of the year in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was 4,046 thousand instead?
Answer: -3500

Question: What would the percentage change in the number of PSUs outstanding at the end of the year in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was 4,046 thousand instead?
Answer: -46.38
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) Selected quarterly financial data is as follows (in millions, except per share amounts): (1) In the quarter ended January 26, 2018, our provision for income taxes included significant charges attributable to United States tax reform. (2) The quarters of fiscal 2018 have been adjusted for our retrospective adoption of the new accounting standard Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Quarter Ended (2)</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>July 28, 2017</td><td>October 27, 2017</td><td>January 26, 2018</td><td>April 27, 2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Net revenues</td><td>$ 1,321</td><td>$ 1,415</td><td>$ 1,539</td><td>$ 1,644</td></tr> <tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>$ 824</td><td>$ 900</td><td>$ 956</td><td>$ 1,029</td></tr> <tr><td>Provision for income taxes (1)</td><td>$ 14</td><td>$ 48</td><td>$ 983</td><td>$ 38</td></tr> <tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>$ 131</td><td>$ 174</td><td>$(479 )</td><td>$ 290</td></tr> <tr><td>Net income (loss) per share, basic</td><td>$ 0.49</td><td>$ 0.65</td><td>$(1.79 )</td><td>$ 1.09</td></tr> <tr><td>Net income (loss) per share, diluted</td><td>$ 0.47</td><td>$ 0.63</td><td>$(1.79 )</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the gross profit between the quarters of January 26 and April 27, 2018 if the gross profit in January 26 was $1,100 million instead?
Answer: -71

Question: What would be the sum of the net revenues from the last two quarters if the net revenue in April 27, 2018 was $2,000 million instead?
Answer: 3539

Question: What would be the percentage change in Net income (loss) between July 28, 2017 and October 27, 2017 if the Net income (loss) in October 27, 2017 was $200 million instead?
Answer: 52.67
Provision for Income Taxes: Our effective income tax rates for each of the periods presented were the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates. In fiscal 2018, the Tax Act was signed into law. The more significant provisions of the Tax Act as applicable to us are described above under “Impacts of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017”. refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual report for a discussion regarding the differences between the effective income tax rates as presented for the periods below and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rates that were in effect during these periods. Future effective income tax rates could be adversely affected by an unfavorable shift of earnings weighted to jurisdictions with higher tax rates, by unfavorable changes in tax laws and regulations, by adverse rulings in tax related litigation, or by shortfalls in stock-based compensation realized by employees relative to stock-based compensation that was recorded for book purposes, among others. Provision for income taxes decreased in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 primarily due to the absence of the initial accounting charges related to the Tax Act that were recorded in fiscal 2018. To a lesser extent, provision for income taxes also decreased in fiscal 2019 due to the net favorable impacts of our final accounting for the Tax Act in fiscal 2019; the net favorable impacts of the Tax Act on our tax profile during fiscal 2019; the favorable impact of a tax benefit arising from an increase in a deferred tax asset associated with a partial realignment of our legal structure in fiscal 2019; and lower income before provision for income taxes in fiscal 2019. These decreases to our provision for income taxes in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 were partially offset both by lower excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2019, and by less favorable changes in net unrecognized tax benefits due to settlements with tax authorities and other events in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Year Ended May 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Percent Change</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>(Dollars in millions)</td><td>2019</td><td>Actual</td><td>Constant</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Provision for income taxes</td><td>$1,185</td><td>-87%</td><td>-86%</td><td>$8,837</td></tr> <tr><td>Effective tax rate</td><td>9.7%</td><td></td><td></td><td>71.1%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: Given that the average effective tax rate of 2017, 2018 and 2019 was 55.7%, how much was the effective tax rate in 2017?
Answer: 86.3

Question: If the provision for income taxes in 2019 was 2345 million instead, by how much less was the provision for income taxes in 2019 then 2018?
Answer: 6492

Question: Given that the provision of income taxes for 2017 was 2111 million, what was the total provision for income taxes across the 3 years?
Answer: 12133
In the Communications Solutions segment, operating income decreased $79 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018. The Communications Solutions segment’s operating income included the following: Excluding these items, operating income decreased in fiscal 2019 due primarily to lower volume. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Fiscal</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>(in millions)</td></tr> <tr><td>Restructuring and other charges, net</td><td>$ 48</td><td>$ 13</td></tr> <tr><td>Other items</td><td>1</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 13</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would Restructuring and other charges, net be larger if the amount in 2018 was $50 million instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in Total operating income in the Communications Solutions segment in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $43 million instead?
Answer: 30

Question: What would the percentage change in Total operating income in the Communications Solutions segment in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $43 million instead?
Answer: 230.77
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) NOTE 8 — Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities 2016 Plan In June 2016, we announced plans to restructure operations by phasing out production at our Elkhart, IN facility and transitioning it into a research and development center supporting our global operations ("June 2016 Plan"). Additional organizational changes were also implemented in various other locations. In 2017, we revised this plan to include an additional $1,100 in planned costs related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters in Lisle, IL and our plant in Bolingbrook, IL, both of which have now been consolidated into a single facility. Restructuring charges under this plan, which is substantially complete, were $4,284, $4,559, and $4,139 during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The total restructuring liability related to the June 2016 Plan was $233 and $668 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Any additional costs related to line movements, equipment charges, and other costs will be expensed as incurred. The following table displays the restructuring charges associated with the June 2016 Plan as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through December 31, 2019: (1) Other charges include the effects of currency translation, travel, legal and other charges. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>June 2016 Plan</td><td>Planned Costs</td><td>Actual costs incurred through December 31, 2019</td></tr> <tr><td>Workforce reduction</td><td>$3,075</td><td>$3,340</td></tr> <tr><td>Building and equipment relocation</td><td>9,025</td><td>10,534</td></tr> <tr><td>Asset impairment charge</td><td>—</td><td>1,168</td></tr> <tr><td>Other charges (1)</td><td>1,300</td><td>988</td></tr> <tr><td>Restructuring charges</td><td>$13,400</td><td>$16,030</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the difference between the planned costs and actual costs incurred for Building and Equipment Relocation if planned costs were $9,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 1534

Question: What would be the difference between the planned costs and actual costs incurred for Workforce Reduction if the actual costs were $2,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 1075

Question: What would be the difference between the planned costs and actual costs incurred for total Restructuring Charges if the planned costs were $10,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 6030
Net Periodic Benefit Cost The following table provides information about the net periodic benefit cost for the plans for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands): On September 1, 2018, the Company adopted a new accounting standard, which changes the presentation of net periodic benefit cost in the Consolidated Statements of Operation. The Company adopted the standard on a retrospective basis which results in reclassifications for the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost from selling, general and administrative expense to cost of revenue and for the other components from selling, general and administrative expense to other expense. Prior periods have not been reclassified due to immateriality. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Pension</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Service cost</td><td>$1,437</td><td>$1,063</td><td>$1,068</td></tr> <tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>3,715</td><td>3,807</td><td>2,942</td></tr> <tr><td>Expected long-term return on plan assets</td><td>(5,291)</td><td>(5,954)</td><td>(4,206)</td></tr> <tr><td>Recognized actuarial loss</td><td>741</td><td>1,127</td><td>1,929</td></tr> <tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit</td><td>(44)</td><td>(88)</td><td>(138)</td></tr> <tr><td>Net settlement loss</td><td>634</td><td>116</td><td>1,472</td></tr> <tr><td>Net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$1,192</td><td>$71</td><td>$3,067</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in interest cost between 2018 and 2019 if interest cost in 2019 was $4,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 193

Question: How many years would the recognized actuarial loss exceed $1,000 thousand if the recognized actuarial loss in 2019 was $1,100 thousand instead?
Answer: 3

Question: What would be the total percentage change in the Net periodic benefit cost between 2017 and 2019 if the net periodic benefit cost in 2019 was $4,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 30.42
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis (in thousands): The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value as of each reporting date because of the short maturity of those instruments. The Company did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that were recognized or disclosed at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>December 31, 2019</td><td></td><td></td><td>December 31, 2018</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td></tr> <tr><td>Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Money market funds</td><td>$256,915</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$254,552</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr> <tr><td>Other current assets:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Indemnification - Sale of SSL</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$598</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$2,410</td></tr> <tr><td>Liabilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Long term liabilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Indemnification - Globalstar do Brasil S.A.</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$145</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$184</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the value of the company's net assets in 2019 if the value of its Level 1 assets is doubled?
Answer: 514283

Question: What would be the value of the company's net assets in 2018 if the value of its Level 1 assets is halved?
Answer: 129502

Question: What would be the percentage change in the company's Level 3 liabilities between 2018 and 2019 if its 2019 liabilities increased by $50 thousand?
Answer: 5.98
NantHealth, Inc Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Dollars in thousands) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Net loss</td><td>$(62,762)</td><td>(192,152)</td></tr> <tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss) from foreign currency translation</td><td>129</td><td>(203)</td></tr> <tr><td>Total other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>129</td><td>(203)</td></tr> <tr><td>Comprehensive loss</td><td>$(62,633)</td><td>$(192,355)</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the average net loss in 2018 and 2019 if the net loss in 2018 is decreased by $400,000?
Answer: 127257

Question: What would be the percentage change in net loss between 2018 and 2019 if the loss in 2019 is instead $200,000,000?
Answer: 4.08

Question: What would be the percentage change in comprehensive loss between 2018 and 2019 if the value in 2019 is increased by $5,000,000?
Answer: -64.84
Contractual Obligations Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019, were: We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect or are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our financial condition or changes in our financial condition. Management believes that existing capital resources and funds generated from operations are sufficient to finance anticipated capital requirements. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Payments due by period</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Total</td><td>2020</td><td>2021-2022</td><td>2023-2024</td><td>2025-beyond</td></tr> <tr><td>Long-term debt, including interest</td><td>$111,586</td><td>$2,807</td><td>$5,876</td><td>$102,903</td><td>$—</td></tr> <tr><td>Operating lease payments</td><td>37,610</td><td>4,467</td><td>8,764</td><td>7,813</td><td>16,566</td></tr> <tr><td>Retirement obligations</td><td>6,447</td><td>757</td><td>1,429</td><td>1,328</td><td>2,933</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>$155,643</td><td>$8,031</td><td>$16,069</td><td>$112,044</td><td>$19,499</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the difference between total Operating lease payments and   Retirement obligations   if   Retirement obligations   were $30,000 instead?
Answer: 7610

Question: What would be the difference between payments due in 2023-2024 between Long-term debt, including interest and  Operating lease payments  if  Operating lease payments  for that period was $100,000 instead?
Answer: 2903

Question: What would be the percentage change in the total contractual obligations due between 2020 and 2021-2022 if the contractual obligations due in 2021-2022 were $10,000 instead?
Answer: 24.52