aveni-ai/aveni-bench-tat-hqa huggingface dataset:
During the period 5.0 million (2017/18: 5.0 million) options were granted under the Sharesave Plan, with a weighted average exercise price at the date of exercise of 30 pence per ordinary share (2017/18: 33 pence). The options outstanding at 30 March 2019 had a weighted average exercise price of 32 pence (2017/18: 33 pence), and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.6 years (2017/18: 1.6 years). In 2018/19, the Group recognised an expense of £2.1m (2017/18: £2.8m), related to all equity-settled share-based payment transactions. Premier Foods plc Sharesave Plan <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>2018/19</td><td></td><td>2017/18</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Weighted average exercise price</td><td></td><td>Weighted average exercise price</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Options</td><td>(p)</td><td>Options</td><td>(p)</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding at the beginning of the period</td><td>17,835,628</td><td>33</td><td>20,231,334</td><td>35</td></tr> <tr><td>Exercised during the period</td><td>(4,306,470)</td><td>32</td><td>(3,536,539)</td><td>34</td></tr> <tr><td>Granted during the period</td><td>5,022,240</td><td>30</td><td>4,988,669</td><td>33</td></tr> <tr><td>Forfeited/lapsed during the period</td><td>(2,447,511)</td><td>33</td><td>(3,847,836)</td><td>44</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding at the end of the period</td><td>16,103,887</td><td>32</td><td>17,835,628</td><td>33</td></tr> <tr><td>Exercisable at the end of the period</td><td>2,673,154</td><td>32</td><td>792,451</td><td>35</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If Outstanding at the beginning of the period in 2018/19 was 20,500,000, what would be the change from 2017/18 to 2018/19?
Answer: 268666

Question: If Exercised during the period weighted average exercise price in 2018/19 was 40, what would be the change from 2017/18 to 2018/19?
Answer: 6

Question: What would be the change in options granted between 2017/18 and 2018/19 if the amount in 2018/19 was 5,000,000 instead?
Answer: 11331
(19) Income Taxes As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the components of deferred tax assets primarily relate to equity method investments, equity-based compensation, deferred revenues, interest rate swaps, employee benefits accruals and deferred compensation. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the components of deferred tax liabilities primarily relate to depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, property and equipment and deferred contract costs. The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following (in millions): <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred tax assets:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Equity method investments</td><td>$25.7</td><td>$—</td></tr> <tr><td>Equity-based compensation</td><td>12.6</td><td>9.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred revenues</td><td>6.2</td><td>14.8</td></tr> <tr><td>Interest rate swaps</td><td>5.6</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>13.0</td><td>11.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Total deferred tax assets</td><td>63.1</td><td>35.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred tax liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Goodwill and other intangibles</td><td>(168.7)</td><td>(178.9)</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred contract costs</td><td>(40.3)</td><td>(41.9)</td></tr> <tr><td>Property, equipment and computer software</td><td>(34.3)</td><td>(28.0)</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>(5.1)</td><td>(7.5)</td></tr> <tr><td>Total deferred tax liabilities</td><td>(248.4)</td><td>(256.3)</td></tr> <tr><td>Net deferred tax liability</td><td>$(185.3)</td><td>$(220.9)</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in equity-based compensation between 2018 and 2019 if the equity-based compensation in 2018 was $10 million instead?
Answer: 2.6

Question: How many years did deferred revenues exceed $10 million if deferred revenues in 2019 were $11 million instead?
Answer: 2

Question: What would be the percentage change in Total deferred tax liabilities between 2018 and 2019 if the total deferred tax liabilities in 2019 was -$100 million instead?
Answer: -60.98
As a result of the adoption of ASC 606, our deferred product revenues and deferred product costs for the fleet management and auto vehicle finance verticals increased as balances are now amortized over the estimated average in-service lives of these devices. Deferred income tax assets and accumulated deficit increased as a result of the changes made to our deferred product revenues and deferred product costs. The cumulative effect of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 were as follows (in thousands): (1) Deferred product costs included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets amounted to $5.4 million and $6.0 million, respectively, as of March 1, 2018. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Balance at</td><td>ASC 606</td><td>Balance at</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>February 28, 2018</td><td>Adjustments</td><td>March 1, 2018</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Assets</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1)</td><td>$12,000</td><td>1,891</td><td>$13,891</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred income tax assets</td><td>31,581</td><td>532</td><td>32,113</td></tr> <tr><td>Other assets (1)</td><td>18,829</td><td>3,145</td><td>21,974</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Liabilities and Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred revenue</td><td>$17,757</td><td>2,156</td><td>19,913</td></tr> <tr><td>Other non-current liabilities</td><td>24,249</td><td>5,007</td><td>29,256</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td></td><td></td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What were the balance of total assets at February 28, 2018 if other assets were now $20,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 63581

Question: What were the balance of total assets at March 1, 2018 if other assets were now $20,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 66004

Question: What is the difference in balance of Deferred income tax assets and Deferred revenue at February 28, 2018 if Deferred revenue is now $40,000 thousand?
Answer: 8419
Note 7. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets and Accrued and Other Current Liabilities Prepaid expenses and other current assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following: <table> <tbody> <tr><td>December 31,</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Prepaid expenses</td><td>$1,948</td><td>$1,179</td></tr> <tr><td>Securities litigation insurance receivable</td><td>16,627</td><td>306</td></tr> <tr><td>Other current assets</td><td>1,556</td><td>2,865</td></tr> <tr><td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets</td><td>$20,131</td><td>$4,350</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the percentage change in prepaid expenses between 2018 and 2019 if the prepaid expenses in 2019 is increased by $1,000?
Answer: 150.04

Question: What would be the average prepaid expenses paid in 2018 and 2019 if the prepaid expenses in 2019 is doubled?
Answer: 2537.5

Question: What would be the total prepaid expenses made in 2018 and 2019 if the total is doubled and then decreased by $3,000?
Answer: 3254
Constant underlying earnings per share Constant underlying earnings per share (constant underlying EPS) is calculated as underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity at constant exchange rates and excluding the impact of both translational hedges and price growth in excess of 26% per year in hyperinflationary economies divided by the diluted average number of ordinary share units. This measure reflects the underlying earnings for each ordinary share unit of the Group in constant exchange rates. The reconciliation of underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity to constant underlying earnings attributable to shareholders’ equity and the calculation of constant underlying EPS is as follows: (a) Restated following adoption of IFRS 16. See note 1 and note 24 for further details. (b) See note 7. (c) See pages 28 and 29 for further details. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>€ million</td><td>€ million</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>(Restated)(a)</td></tr> <tr><td>Underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity(b)</td><td>6,688</td><td>6,345</td></tr> <tr><td>Impact of translation from current to constant exchange rates and translational hedges</td><td>13</td><td>46</td></tr> <tr><td>Impact of price growth in excess of 26% per year in hyperinflationary economies(c)</td><td>(108)</td><td>(10)</td></tr> <tr><td>Constant underlying earnings attributable to shareholders’ equity</td><td>6,593</td><td>6,381</td></tr> <tr><td>Diluted combined average number of share units (millions of units)</td><td>2,626.7</td><td>2,694.8</td></tr> <tr><td>Constant underlying EPS (€)</td><td>2.51</td><td>2.37</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If the Underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity increases by 10% in 2019, what is the revised percentage change?
Answer: 15.95

Question: If the Diluted combined average number of share units (millions of units) increases by 5% in 2018, what is the revised change?
Answer: -202.84

Question: If the Constant underlying earnings attributable to shareholders’ equity increases by 10% in 2019, what is the revised average?
Answer: 6816.65
Note 9. Receivables, Net Receivables, net consisted of the following (in thousands): <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Trade accounts receivable, current</td><td>$378,616</td><td>$338,473</td></tr> <tr><td>Income taxes receivable</td><td>1,571</td><td>916</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>13,440</td><td>11,132</td></tr> <tr><td>Receivables, gross</td><td>393,627</td><td>350,521</td></tr> <tr><td>Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>3,480</td><td>3,096</td></tr> <tr><td>Receivables,net</td><td>$390,147</td><td>$347,425</td></tr> <tr><td>Allowance for doubtful accounts as a percent of trade accounts receivable, current</td><td>0.9%</td><td>0.9%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the amount of Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts be larger if the amount in 2019 was $3,080 thousand instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in Income taxes receivable in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $1,916 thousand instead?
Answer: 1000

Question: What would the percentage change in Income taxes receivable in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $1,916 thousand instead?
Answer: 109.17
14. Restructuring and Related Charges Following is a summary of the Company’s restructuring and related charges (in thousands): (1) Includes $21.5 million, $16.3 million and $51.3 million recorded in the EMS segment, $2.6 million, $16.6 million and $82.4 million recorded in the DMS segment and $1.8 million, $4.0 million and $26.7 million of non-allocated charges for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Except for asset write-off costs, all restructuring and related charges are cash settled. (2) Fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, includes expenses related to the 2017 and 2013 Restructuring Plans. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Fiscal Year Ended August 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017(2)</td></tr> <tr><td>Employee severance and benefit costs</td><td>$16,029</td><td>$16,269</td><td>$56,834</td></tr> <tr><td>Lease costs</td><td>(41)</td><td>1,596</td><td>3,966</td></tr> <tr><td>Asset write-off costs</td><td>(3,566)</td><td>16,264</td><td>94,346</td></tr> <tr><td>Other costs</td><td>13,492</td><td>2,773</td><td>5,249</td></tr> <tr><td>Total restructuring and related charges(1)</td><td>$25,914</td><td>$36,902</td><td>$160,395</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in Employee severance and benefit costs between 2017 and 2018 if lease costs in 2017 were $10,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 6269

Question: What would be the change in Other costs between 2018 and 2019 if Other costs in 2019 were $5,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 2227

Question: What would be the percentage change in the Total restructuring and related charges between 2018 and 2019 if the Total restructuring and related charges in 2019 were $40,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 8.4
Note 13 Contract costs The table below provides a reconciliation of the contract costs balance. Contract costs are amortized over a period ranging from 12 to 84 months. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Opening balance, January 1</td><td>707</td><td>636</td></tr> <tr><td>Incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs</td><td>602</td><td>567</td></tr> <tr><td>Amortization included in operating costs</td><td>(523)</td><td>(477)</td></tr> <tr><td>Impairment charges included in operating costs</td><td>(3)</td><td>(19)</td></tr> <tr><td>Ending balance, December 31</td><td>783</td><td>707</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would the difference in the opening and ending balances in 2019 be if the opening balance in 2019 is 703?
Answer: 80

Question: What would the total incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs in 2018 and 2019 be if the amount in 2018 is 598?
Answer: 1200

Question: What would the change in the incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs in 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 is 607?
Answer: 40
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a) Cisco common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CSCO. Information regarding quarterly cash dividends declared on Cisco’s common stock during fiscal 2019 and 2018 may be found in Supplementary Financial Data on page 106 of this report. There were 39,216 registered shareholders as of August 30, 2019. (b) Not applicable. (c) Issuer purchases of equity securities (in millions, except per-share amounts): On September 13, 2001, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program. On February 13, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized a $15 billion increase to the stock repurchase program. As of July 27, 2019, the remaining authorized amount for stock repurchases under this program, including the additional authorization, is approximately $13.5 billion with no termination date. For the majority of restricted stock units granted, the number of shares issued on the date the restricted stock units vest is net of shares withheld to meet applicable tax withholding requirements. Although these withheld shares are not issued or considered common stock repurchases under our stock repurchase program and therefore are not included in the preceding table, they are treated as common stock repurchases in our financial statements as they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). <table> <tbody> <tr><td>Period</td><td>Total Number of Shares Purchased</td><td>Average Price Paid per Share</td><td>Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs</td><td>Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs</td></tr> <tr><td>April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019</td><td>42</td><td>$54.33</td><td>42</td><td>$15,700</td></tr> <tr><td>May 26, 2019 to June 22, 2019</td><td>22</td><td>$55.07</td><td>22</td><td>$14,465</td></tr> <tr><td>June 23, 2019 to July 27, 2019</td><td>18</td><td>$56.46</td><td>18</td><td>$13,460</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>82</td><td>$54.99</td><td>82</td><td></td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What was the total amount paid for the shares during the period from April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019, if the average price paid per share was $53.98 from April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019?
Answer: 3478.7

Question: What was the average total amount paid for the shares during the period from April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2019 to June 22, 2019, if the average price paid per share was $53.98 from April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019?
Answer: 1739.35

Question: What is the average of Average Price Paid per Share in the three period if it is $57 in the period of June 23, 2019 to July 27, 2019?
Answer: 55.47
Net revenues by geographical region Percentage of revenue by geographic region as presented below is based on the billing location of the customer. Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding. The Americas include U.S., Canada, and Latin America; EMEA includes Europe, Middle East, and Africa; APJ includes Asia Pacific and Japan. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Fiscal Year</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Americas</td><td>64%</td><td>63%</td></tr> <tr><td>EMEA</td><td>21%</td><td>22%</td></tr> <tr><td>APJ</td><td>15%</td><td>16%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If the percentage of revenue for Americas was 67% instead, What would be the change in percentage of revenue for Americas from fiscal 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 4

Question: If the percentage of revenue for EMEA was 25% instead, What would be the change in percentage of revenue for EMEA from fiscal 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 3

Question: If the percentage of revenue for APJ was 18% instead, What would be the change in percentage of revenue for APJ from fiscal 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 2
2019 vs 2018 SMB segment net revenue was flat for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decline in net revenue of our network storage products, substantially offset by growth in net revenue of our switch products. Geographically, net revenue grew in APAC, but declined in Americas and EMEA. Contribution income decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year, primarily as a result of lower gross margin attainment, partially offset by lower operating expenses as a proportion of net revenue. Contribution margin decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year, primarily lower gross margin attainment mainly resulting from foreign exchange headwinds due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar as well as higher provisions for sales returns. 2018 vs 2017 SMB segment net revenue increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year, primarily due to growth in switches, partially offset by the decrease in network storage. SMB experienced growth in net revenue across all regions. SMB net revenue was further benefited by lower provisions for sales returns deemed to be a reduction of net revenue. Contribution income increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year, primarily due to increasing net revenue and improved gross margin performance not being met with proportionate increases in operating expense compared to the prior period. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>% Change</td><td>2018</td><td>% Change</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(in thousands, except percentage data)</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Net revenue</td><td>$287,372</td><td>(0.1)%</td><td>$287,756</td><td>6.2%</td><td>$270,908</td></tr> <tr><td>Percentage of net revenue</td><td>28.8%</td><td></td><td>27.2%</td><td></td><td>26.1%</td></tr> <tr><td>Contribution income</td><td>$67,282</td><td>(4.1)%</td><td>$70,142</td><td>9.8%</td><td>$63,865</td></tr> <tr><td>Contribution margin</td><td>23.4%</td><td></td><td>24.4%</td><td></td><td>23.6%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What was the percentage change in net revenue from 2017 to 2019 if the net revenue in 2019 is $299,418?
Answer: 10.52

Question: In which year is the contribution margin the highest if the contribution margin is 2019 is 24.8%?
Answer: 2019

Question: What was the change in contribution income from 2017 to 2018 if the contribution income is $69,246 in 2017?
Answer: 896
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) The components of the prepaid (accrued) cost of the domestic and foreign pension plans are classified in the following lines in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>U.S.Pension Plans</td><td></td><td>Non-U.S. Pension Plans</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Prepaid pension asset</td><td>$62,082</td><td>$54,100</td><td>$—</td><td>$—</td></tr> <tr><td>Accrued expenses and other liabilities</td><td>(100)</td><td>(100)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Long-term pension obligations</td><td>(1,045)</td><td>(992)</td><td>(1,214)</td><td>(1,331)</td></tr> <tr><td>Net prepaid (accrued) cost</td><td>$60,937</td><td>$53,008</td><td>$(1,214)</td><td>$(1,331)</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in the Prepaid pension asset for U.S Pension Plans between 2018 and 2019 if the Prepaid pension asset in 2018 was $60,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 2082

Question: What would be the change in the Net prepaid (accrued) cost for U.S. Pension Plans between 2018 and 2019 if the Net prepaid (accrued) cost in 2018 was $60,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 937

Question: What would be the percentage change in Long-term pension obligations for U.S. Pension Plans between 2018 and 2019 if the long-term pension obligations in 2019 was -$500 thousand instead?
Answer: -49.6
Share Options The fair value of equity-settled share options granted is measured as at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. The following table illustrates the weighted average inputs into the Black-Scholes model in the year: The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was $ cents 220.53 (2018: $ cents 185.33). The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical share price volatility is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome. An increase in the expected volatility will increase the estimated fair value. The expected life of the options is based on historical data and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on the Director’s best estimate, taking into account the effects of exercise restrictions, non-transferability and behavioural considerations. An increase in the expected life will increase the estimated fair value. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year-ended</td><td>Year-ended</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>31 March 2019</td><td>31 March 2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Weighted average share price ($ cents)</td><td>676.10</td><td>628.23</td></tr> <tr><td>Weighted average exercise price ($ cents)</td><td>558.54</td><td>516.70</td></tr> <tr><td>Expected volatility</td><td>54.91%</td><td>38.20%</td></tr> <tr><td>Expected life of options (years)</td><td>1.69</td><td>2.08</td></tr> <tr><td>Risk free rate</td><td>1.56%</td><td>1.49%</td></tr> <tr><td>Dividend yield</td><td>0.81%</td><td>0.70%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the Weighted average share price  be larger if the amount in 2019 was $626.10 instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in Weighted average share price in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was 678.23 cents instead?
Answer: 50

Question: What would the percentage change in Weighted average share price  in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was 678.23 cents instead?
Answer: 7.96