aveni-ai/aveni-bench-tat-hqa huggingface dataset:
In connection with the asset-backed securitization programs, the Company recognized the following (in millions): (1) The amounts primarily represent proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving-period transfers. (2) Recorded to other expense within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. (3) Excludes $650.3 million of trade accounts receivable sold, $488.1 million of cash and $13.9 million of net cash received prior to the amendment of the foreign asset-backed securitization program and under the previous North American asset-backed securitization program. The asset-backed securitization programs require compliance with several covenants. The North American asset-backed securitization program covenants include compliance with the interest ratio and debt to EBITDA ratio of the five-year unsecured credit facility amended as of November 8, 2017 (“the 2017 Credit Facility”). The foreign asset-backed securitization program covenants include limitations on certain corporate actions such as mergers and consolidations. As of August 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the asset-backed securitization programs. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Fiscal Year Ended August 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019(3)</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Trade accounts receivable sold</td><td>$4,057</td><td>$8,386</td><td>$8,878</td></tr> <tr><td>Cash proceeds received(1)</td><td>$4,031</td><td>$7,838</td><td>$8,300</td></tr> <tr><td>Pre-tax losses on sale of receivables(2)</td><td>$26</td><td>$15</td><td>$9</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred purchase price receivables as of August 31</td><td>$—</td><td>$533</td><td>$569</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in Trade accounts receivable sold between 2018 and 2019 if trade accounts receivables sold in 2019 was $9,000 million instead?
Answer: 614

Question: How many years would cash proceeds received exceed $5,000 million if cash proceeds received in 2018 was $4,900 million instead?
Answer: 1

Question: What would be the percentage change in Pre-tax losses on sale of receivables between 2017 and 2018 if Pre-tax losses on sale of receivables in 2018 was $20 million instead?
Answer: 122.22
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018 The following tables in this section set forth our selected consolidated statements of operations (in thousands), data for the percentage change and data as a percentage of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net. Revenue The $81.9 million increase in total revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018 was the result of a $46.3 million, or 16%, increase in our SaaS and license revenue and a $35.6 million, or 27%, increase in our hardware and other revenue. Our software license revenue included within SaaS and license revenue increased $2.1 million to $43.4 million in 2019 as compared to $41.3 million during 2018. The increase in our Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue in 2019 was primarily due to growth in our subscriber base, including the revenue impact from subscribers we added in 2018. To a lesser extent, SaaS and license revenue increased in the period due to an increase in license fees. The increase in hardware and other revenue in 2019 compared to 2018 was due to an increase in the volume of video cameras sold. Our Other segment contributed 15% of the increase in SaaS and license revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018. The increase in SaaS and license revenue for our Other segment in 2019 as compared to 2018 was due to an increase in sales of our energy management and demand response solutions and our property management and HVAC solutions. Hardware and other revenue in our Other segment decreased 13% in 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to the timing of sales related to our remote access management solution. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Revenue:</td><td></td><td></td><td>% Change</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2019 vs. 2018</td></tr> <tr><td>SaaS and license revenue</td><td>$337,375</td><td>$291,072</td><td>16%</td></tr> <tr><td>Hardware and other revenue</td><td>164,988</td><td>129,422</td><td>27%</td></tr> <tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>$502,363</td><td>$420,494</td><td>19%</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: How many years would SaaS and license revenue exceed $300,000 thousand if SaaS and license revenue in 2018 was $350,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 2

Question: How many components of revenue would exceed $200,000 thousand in 2018 if Hardware and other revenue in 2018 was $250,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 2

Question: What would SaaS and license revenue as a percentage of total revenue in 2019 be if total revenue was $600,000 thousand instead, while SaaS and license revenue remained unchanged?
Answer: 56.23
NOTE 9 – FINANCIAL ITEMS ¹⁾ Interest for financial assets and liabilities not at fair value through profit and loss. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>USDm</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Financial income</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Interest income from cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash ¹⁾</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.7</td><td>1.6</td></tr> <tr><td>Exchange rate adjustments, including gain from forward exchange rate contracts</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.6</td><td>2.7</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>2.8</td><td>3.3</td><td>4.3</td></tr> <tr><td>Financial expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Interest expenses on mortgage and bank debt ¹⁾</td><td>39.3</td><td>35.7</td><td>33.3</td></tr> <tr><td>Exchange rate adjustments, including loss from forward exchange rate contracts</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Commitment fee</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Other financial expenses</td><td>0.5</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.7</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>41.9</td><td>39.3</td><td>40.6</td></tr> <tr><td>Total financial items</td><td>-39.1</td><td>-36.0</td><td>-36.3</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the amount of financial income be the smallest if the amount in 2019 was $3.8 million instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in total financial expenses in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $42.3 million instead?
Answer: 3

Question: What would the percentage change in total financial expenses in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $42.3 million instead??
Answer: 7.63
3. Inventories Inventories consist of the following (in thousands): <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>August 31,2019</td><td>August 31,2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Raw materials</td><td>$2,310,081</td><td>$2,070,569</td></tr> <tr><td>Work in process</td><td>468,217</td><td>788,742</td></tr> <tr><td>Finished goods</td><td>314,258</td><td>659,335</td></tr> <tr><td>Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory</td><td>(69,553)</td><td>(60,940)</td></tr> <tr><td>Inventories, net</td><td>$3,023,003</td><td>$3,457,706</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in finished goods between 2018 and 2019 if finished goods in 2018 were $700,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 40665

Question: What would be the change in work in process between 2018 and 2019 if work in process in 2019 was $800,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 11258

Question: What would be the percentage change in raw materials between 2018 and 2019 if raw materials in 2019 were $3,000,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 44.89
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) We have also recorded the following amounts to accumulated other comprehensive loss for the U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans, net of tax: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>U.S.Pension Plans</td><td>Non-U.S.Pension Plans</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Unrecognized Loss</td><td>Unrecognized Loss</td></tr> <tr><td>Balance at January 1, 2018</td><td>$75,740</td><td>$1,898</td></tr> <tr><td>Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax</td><td>(4,538)</td><td>(126)</td></tr> <tr><td>Settlements</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Net actuarial gain</td><td>6,732</td><td>196</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign exchange impact</td><td>—</td><td>(52)</td></tr> <tr><td>Tax impact due to implementation of ASU 2018-02</td><td>17,560</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Balance at January 1, 2019</td><td>$95,494</td><td>$1,916</td></tr> <tr><td>Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax</td><td>(4,060)</td><td>(138)</td></tr> <tr><td>Net actuarial (loss) gain</td><td>(2,604)</td><td>78</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign exchange impact</td><td>—</td><td>44</td></tr> <tr><td>Balance at December 31, 2019</td><td>$88,830</td><td>$1,900</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the difference in the balance at December 31, 2019 for Unrecognized losses between U.S and Non-U.S. Pension Plans if Non-U.S. Pension Plans were $80,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 8830

Question: What would be the difference between the Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax between U.S. and Non-U.S. Pension Plans in 2019 if the Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax for U.S. Pension Plans was -$200 thousand instead?
Answer: -62

Question: What would be the percentage change in the balance for unrecognized losses for U.S. Pension Plans between January 1, 2018 and 2019 if the balance in 2019 was $90,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 18.83
The following tables summarize information for operating income (loss), depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, gain (loss) on write down and disposal of long-lived assets, and capital expenditures by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017 and total assets by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands): The following tables summarize information for operating income (loss), depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, gain (loss) on write down and disposal of long-lived assets, and capital expenditures by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017 and total assets by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands): (1) March 31, 2018 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>March 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Total assets:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Solid Capacitors</td><td>$794,402</td><td>$704,851</td></tr> <tr><td>Film and Electrolytic (1)</td><td>219,711</td><td>240,968</td></tr> <tr><td>MSA</td><td>234,419</td><td>254,193</td></tr> <tr><td>Corporate</td><td>69,563</td><td>22,911</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$1,318,095</td><td>$1,222,923</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the change in total assets in Solid Capacitors between 2018 and 2019 if total assets for Solid Capacitors in 2018 was $700,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 94402

Question: What would be the change in total assets in MSA between 2018 and 2019 if the total assets in MSA in 2018 was $200,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 34419

Question: What would be the percentage change total amount of assets across all segments between 2018 and 2019 if the total amount of assets in 2019 was $1,300,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 6.3
Disaggregated Revenue The Company has disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers into categories which depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Consequently, the disaggregation below is based on contract type. Since the terms within these contract types are generally standard in nature, the Company does not believe that further disaggregation would result in increased insight into the economic factors impacting revenue and cash flows. The following table shows the Company's shipping revenues disaggregated by nature of the charter arrangement for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: (1) Voyage charter revenues include approximately $10,152 and $7,600 of revenue related to short-term time charter contracts for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Years Ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Time and bareboat charter revenues</td><td>$263,683</td><td>$213,923</td></tr> <tr><td>Voyage charter revenues(1)</td><td>33,275</td><td>83,542</td></tr> <tr><td>Contracts of affreightment revenues</td><td>58,589</td><td>68,698</td></tr> <tr><td>Total shipping revenues</td><td>$355,547</td><td>$366,163</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If the Time and bareboat charter revenues in Years Ended December 31, 2019 increased to 299,971, what would be the revised change from Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 86048

Question: If the Time and bareboat charter revenues in Years Ended December 31, 2019 increased to 299,971, what would be the revised average for Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 256947

Question: If Voyage charter revenues in 2018 was 43,000, in which year would it be less than 50,000?
Answer: 2019, 2018
NOTE 13—GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows: (1) Includes interest up to maturity and principal payments. Please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" for more details (2) Net of $30.7 million of sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to third parties. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Payments due between</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Total</td><td>July 1, 2019— June 30, 2020</td><td>July 1, 2020— June 30, 2022</td><td>July 1, 2022— June 30, 2024</td><td>July 1, 2024 and beyond</td></tr> <tr><td>Long-term debt obligations (1)</td><td>$3,408,565</td><td>$147,059</td><td>$292,156</td><td>$1,045,567</td><td>$1,923,783</td></tr> <tr><td>Operating lease obligations (2)</td><td>318,851</td><td>72,853</td><td>106,394</td><td>59,441</td><td>80,163</td></tr> <tr><td>Purchase obligations</td><td>11,280</td><td>8,364</td><td>2,747</td><td>169</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$3,738,696</td><td>$228,276</td><td>$401,297</td><td>$1,105,177</td><td>$2,003,946</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If Total Obligations was $4,321,423(in thousands) instead, What is the Total Operating lease obligations expressed as a percentage of Total obligations?
Answer: 7.38

Question: If Operating lease obligations for July 1, 2024 and beyond were 123,532(in thousands) instead, In what year range(s) are Operating lease obligations more than $100,000(in thousands)?
Answer: July 1, 2020— June 30, 2022, July 1, 2024 and beyond

Question: If Total obligations was $4,134,245(in thousands), What is the total obligations of July 1, 2024 and beyond expressed as a percentage of total obligations for July 1, 2019-June 30, 2024?
Answer: 94.07
In relation to the oil derivative instrument (see note 24), the fair value was determined using the estimated discounted cash flows of the additional payments due to us as a result of oil prices moving above a contractual oil price floor over the term of the liquefaction tolling agreement ("LTA"). Significant inputs used in the valuation of the oil derivative instrument include management’s estimate of an appropriate discount rate and the length of time to blend the long-term and the short-term oil prices obtained from quoted prices in active markets. The changes in fair value of our oil derivative instrument is recognized in each period in current earnings in "Realized and unrealized gain on oil derivative instrument" as part of the consolidated statement of income. The realized and unrealized (loss)/ gain on the oil derivative instrument is as follows: The unrealized loss/gain results from movement in oil prices above a contractual floor price over term of the LTA; the realized gain results from monthly billings above the base tolling fee under the LTA. For further information on the nature of this derivative, refer to note 24. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>(in thousands of $)</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Realized gain on oil derivative instrument</td><td>13,089</td><td>26,737</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Unrealized (loss)/gain on oil derivative instrument</td><td>(39,090)</td><td>(9,970)</td><td>15,100</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>(26,001)</td><td>16,767</td><td>15,100</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the unrealized loss on oil derivative instrument be the highest if the loss in 2019 was (10,290) thousand?
Answer: 2019

Question: What would be the change in realized gain on oil derivative instrument from 2017 to 2018 if the gain in 2017 was 12,394 thousand?
Answer: 14343

Question: What would be the percentage change in total realized and unrealized (loss)/ gain on the oil derivative instrument from 2017 to 2018 if the amount in 2018 was 17,483 thousand?
Answer: 15.78
Contract Assets and Liabilities The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from our revenue contracts with customers: Contract assets include costs that are incremental to the acquisition of a contract. Incremental costs are those that result directly from obtaining a contract or costs that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained, which primarily relate to sales commissions. These costs are deferred and amortized over the expected customer life. We determined that the expected customer life is the expected period of benefit as the commission on the renewal contract is not commensurate with the commission on the initial contract. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized expense of $6.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, related to deferred contract acquisition costs. Contract liabilities include deferred revenues related to advanced payments for services and nonrefundable, upfront service activation and set-up fees, which under the new standard are generally deferred and amortized over the expected customer life as the option to renew without paying an upfront fee provides the customer with a material right. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company deferred and recognized revenues of $397.5 million and $354.2 million, respectively. A receivable is recognized in the period the Company provides goods or services when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. Payment terms on invoiced amounts are generally 30 to 60 days. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>(In thousands)</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Accounts receivable, net</td><td>$120,016</td><td>$133,136</td></tr> <tr><td>Contract assets</td><td>18,804</td><td>12,128</td></tr> <tr><td>Contract liabilities</td><td>50,974</td><td>52,966</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If accounts receivable, net in 2019 was 140,000 thousands, what would be the accounts receivable, net increase / (decrease) from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 6864

Question: If contract assets in 2018 was 15,000 thousands, what would be the percentage increase / (decrease) in the contract assets from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 25.36

Question: If contract liabilities in 2019 was 53,000 thousands, what would be the average contract liabilities for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 52983
Note 4 – Property, Plant and Equipment, net Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>December 31,</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Land</td><td>$ 1,565</td><td>$ 1,747</td></tr> <tr><td>Buildings and improvements</td><td>17,332</td><td>17,520</td></tr> <tr><td>Machinery and equipment</td><td>30,670</td><td>29,692</td></tr> <tr><td>Vehicles</td><td>778</td><td>937</td></tr> <tr><td>Office equipment</td><td>851</td><td>838</td></tr> <tr><td>Construction in process</td><td>362</td><td>546</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>51,558</td><td>51,280</td></tr> <tr><td>Less accumulated depreciation</td><td>(29,284 )</td><td>(26,707 )</td></tr> <tr><td>Total property, plant and equipment, net</td><td>$ 22,274</td><td>$ 24,573</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the average value of vehicles for 2018 and 2019 if the value of vehicles in 2019 decreased by 100?
Answer: 807.5

Question: What would be the change in the value of land between 2018 and 2019 if the value of land in 2018 increased by $2,000? 
Answer: -2182

Question: Which year would have a higher total property, plant and equipment, net value if the value in 2019 was $30,000 instead?
Answer: 2019
Restricted Shares We granted shares to certain of our Directors, executives and key employees under the 2016 and 2011 Plans, the vesting of which is service-based. The following table summarizes the activity during the twelve months ended March 31, 2019 for restricted shares awarded under the 2016 and 2011 Plans: The weighted-average grant date fair value of the restricted shares is determined based upon the closing price of our common shares on the grant date. During fiscal 2019, a total of 197,917 shares, net of 47,146 shares withheld from the vested restricted shares to cover the employee's minimum applicable income taxes, were issued from treasury. The shares withheld were returned to treasury shares. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Number of Shares</td><td>Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>(per share)</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding at April 1, 2018</td><td>243,354</td><td>$10.78</td></tr> <tr><td>Granted</td><td>265,452</td><td>14.66</td></tr> <tr><td>Vested</td><td>(197,917)</td><td>12.74</td></tr> <tr><td>Forfeited</td><td>(73,743)</td><td>11.3</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding at March 31, 2019</td><td>237,146</td><td>$13.46</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If granted shares were 250,000, what would be the difference between the granted shares and outstanding shares as at April 1, 2018?
Answer: 6646

Question: If  Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value per share for outstanding at April 1, 2018 was $20.00 instead, What would be the total Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value for Outstanding at April 1, 2018?
Answer: 4867080

Question: If vested Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value were 12.00, what would be the difference between the vested and granted Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value?
Answer: 2.66