aveni-ai/aveni-bench-tat-hqa huggingface dataset:
DSUs Eligible bonuses and RSUs/PSUs may be paid in the form of DSUs when executives or other eligible employees elect to or are required to participate in the plan. The value of a DSU at the issuance date is equal to the value of one BCE common share. For non-management directors, compensation is paid in DSUs until the minimum share ownership requirement is met; thereafter, at least 50% of their compensation is paid in DSUs. There are no vesting requirements relating to DSUs. Dividends in the form of additional DSUs are credited to the participant’s account on each dividend payment date and are equivalent in value to the dividends paid on BCE common shares. DSUs are settled when the holder leaves the company. The following table summarizes the status of outstanding DSUs at December 31, 2019 and 2018. (1) The weighted average fair value of the DSUs issued was $59 in 2019 and $55 in 2018. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>NUMBER OF DSUs</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding, January 1</td><td>4,391,997</td><td>4,309,528</td></tr> <tr><td>Issued (1)</td><td>84,588</td><td>94,580</td></tr> <tr><td>Settlement of RSUs/PSUs</td><td>146,960</td><td>112,675</td></tr> <tr><td>Dividends credited</td><td>236,079</td><td>240,879</td></tr> <tr><td>Settled</td><td>(236,525)</td><td>(365,665)</td></tr> <tr><td>Outstanding, December 31</td><td>4,623,099</td><td>4,391,997</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the amount of Issued DSUs be larger if the amount issued in 2019 is 94,588?
Answer: 2019

Question: What would the fair value of the DSUs issued in 2019 be if the weighted average fair value of the DSUs issued in 2019 is $61?
Answer: 5159868

Question: What would the average value of the weighted average fair value of the DSUs issued in 2018 and 2019 be if the weighted average fair value of the DSUs issued was $61 in 2019?
Answer: 58
b. Categories of equity shareholding as on March 31, 2019: c. Top ten equity shareholders of the Company as on March 31, 2019: * Shareholding is consolidated based on Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the shareholder. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>Category</td><td>Number of equity shares held</td><td>Percentage of holding</td></tr> <tr><td>Promoters</td><td>2,702,450,947</td><td>72.0</td></tr> <tr><td>Other Entities of the Promoter Group</td><td>1,091,053</td><td>-</td></tr> <tr><td>Mutual Funds &amp; UTI</td><td>93,357,668</td><td>2.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Banks, Financial Institutions, States and Central Government</td><td>2,750,113</td><td>0.1</td></tr> <tr><td>Insurance Companies</td><td>196,172,807</td><td>5.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign Institutional Investors and Foreign Portfolio Investors - Corporate</td><td>592,842,601</td><td>15.8</td></tr> <tr><td>NRI&#x27;s / OCB&#x27;s / Foreign Nationals</td><td>4,854,682</td><td>0.1</td></tr> <tr><td>Corporate Bodies / Trust</td><td>26,208,151</td><td>0.7</td></tr> <tr><td>Indian Public &amp; Others</td><td>130,744,399</td><td>3.6</td></tr> <tr><td>Alternate Investment Fund</td><td>1,663,495</td><td>-</td></tr> <tr><td>IEPF account</td><td>248,790</td><td>-</td></tr> <tr><td>GRAND TOTAL</td><td>3,752,384,706</td><td>100.0</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Name of the shareholder*</td><td>Number of equity shares held</td><td>Percentage of holding</td></tr> <tr><td>1. Tata Sons Private Limited</td><td>2,702,450,947</td><td>72.0</td></tr> <tr><td>2. Life Insurance Corporation of India</td><td>152,493,927</td><td>4.1</td></tr> <tr><td>3. SBI Mutual Fund</td><td>21,680,561</td><td>0.6</td></tr> <tr><td>4. First State Investments Icvc- Stewart Investors Asia Pacific Leaders Fund</td><td>19,248,438</td><td>0.5</td></tr> <tr><td>5. Government of Singapore</td><td>18,028,475</td><td>0.5</td></tr> <tr><td>6. Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund</td><td>16,731,906</td><td>0.5</td></tr> <tr><td>7. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd</td><td>16,139,316</td><td>0.4</td></tr> <tr><td>8. Axis Mutual Fund Trustee Limited</td><td>15,244,614</td><td>0.4</td></tr> <tr><td>9. Abu Dhabi Investment Authority</td><td>15,036,984</td><td>0.4</td></tr> <tr><td>10. Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund, A Series of Vanguard International Equity Index Funds</td><td>14,112,213</td><td>0.4</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: How many equity shares would 67.9% shareholding represent? 
Answer: 2547869215.37

Question: How many shares would ICICI Prudential Life Insurance hold if it has 0.4% shareholding? 
Answer: 15009538.82

Question: If the percentage difference in shareholding between Promoters and Insurance Companies is 66.8%, how many equity shares would that represent?
Answer: 2506592983.61
4. Link between Group performance and remuneration outcomes The Altium Remuneration Framework is designed to align key employee remuneration to shareholder returns (in the form of capital appreciation and dividends). The table below shows the Group performance on key financial results and performance metrics over the last five years. Altium’s remuneration strategy has evolved over the past seven years and we believe that it is linked intrinsically to the success of the Group. Strong payout results for STI and LTI have reflected the strong financial performance of the Group. In addition, STI and LTI hurdles have changed over time to better reflect what is most important for Group growth. 1 Normalised EPS and Profit for the year excludes deferred tax asset of US$77 million recognised on the transfer of core business assets to the USA. 2 The maximum STI payable based on the above performance hurdles is 100%, however based on achievement of individual personal goals, the overall achievement level may be modified up to 150% or down to 0%. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>US$’000</td><td>US$’000</td><td>US$’000</td><td>US$’000</td><td>US$’000</td></tr> <tr><td>Revenue</td><td>171,819</td><td>140,176</td><td>110,865</td><td>93,597</td><td>80,216</td></tr> <tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>62,721</td><td>44,869</td><td>33,254</td><td>27,430</td><td>22,697</td></tr> <tr><td>EPS</td><td>40.57</td><td>28.86</td><td>21.70</td><td>17.89</td><td>12.47 1</td></tr> <tr><td>Profit for the year</td><td>52,893</td><td>37,489</td><td>28,077</td><td>23,020</td><td>15,398 1</td></tr> <tr><td>Dividend declared - AU cents</td><td>34</td><td>27</td><td>23</td><td>20</td><td>16</td></tr> <tr><td>Share price - AU$</td><td>$34.2</td><td>22.51</td><td>8.57</td><td>6.46</td><td>4.43</td></tr> <tr><td>STI Achievement</td><td>100% - 150% 2</td><td>131%</td><td>103%</td><td>97%</td><td>63%</td></tr> <tr><td>STI performance hurdles</td><td>70% Revenue 30% EBITDA</td><td>50% Revenue 50% EBITDA</td><td>70% Revenue 30% EBITDA</td><td>50% Revenue 50% EBITDA</td><td>Different metrics related to subscriber related to subscriber growth, EPS and Product development related to subscriber growth, EPS and Product development related to subscriber growth, EPS and Product development</td></tr> <tr><td>LTI Achievement</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td><td>50%</td></tr> <tr><td>LTI performance hurdles</td><td>50% Revenue</td><td>EPS</td><td>EPS</td><td>EPS</td><td>50% Subscriber growth 50% EPS</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What is the percentage change in the revenue from 2018 to 2019 if the revenue in 2018 is now 150,000,000?
Answer: 14.55

Question: What is the percentage change in profits from 2018 to 2019 if the profits in 2019 is now 60,000,000?
Answer: 60.05

Question: What is the percentage change in EBITDA from 2017 to 2018 if the amount in 2018 is now 50,000,000?
Answer: 50.36
(4) Property and Equipment Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands): Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $22,538,000, $21,721,000 and $25,787,000 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. On November 1, 2019, we completed the purchase of real estate in Chandler, Arizona for approximately $48,000,000 that we intend to use as our global corporate headquarters. The property contains a building and some infrastructure in place that we will complete readying for our use over the next year. We intend to sell our current properties in Tempe, Arizona. Included within the software, buildings and land values presented above are assets in the process of being readied for use in the amounts of approximately $12,138,000, $27,658,000 and $11,700,000, respectively. Depreciation on these assets will commence, as appropriate, when they are ready for use and placed in service. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Software</td><td>$114,674</td><td>$170,327</td></tr> <tr><td>Buildings</td><td>92,092</td><td>64,263</td></tr> <tr><td>Equipment</td><td>60,661</td><td>100,421</td></tr> <tr><td>Furniture and fixtures</td><td>34,768</td><td>38,200</td></tr> <tr><td>Lease hold improvements</td><td>33,668</td><td>26,319</td></tr> <tr><td>Land</td><td>31,374</td><td>5,124</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>367,237</td><td>404,654</td></tr> <tr><td>Accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>(236,330)</td><td>(331,700)</td></tr> <tr><td>Property and equipment, net</td><td>$130,907</td><td>$72,954</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If the Software in 2019 increased to 165,074 thousand, what would be the revised change between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -5253

Question: If the Buildings in 2019 increased to 99,699 thousand, what would be the revised change between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 35436

Question: If the Software in 2019 increased to 165,074 thousand, what would be the revised average for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 167700.5
17. Income Taxes Income before income taxes for the Company’s domestic and foreign operations was as follows: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Years Ended June 30,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>($ in millions)</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Domestic</td><td>$204.2</td><td>$140.3</td><td>$56.0</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign</td><td>11.8</td><td>19.9</td><td>14.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Income before income taxes</td><td>$216.0</td><td>$160.2</td><td>$70.2</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would Foreign be largest if the amount in 2019 was $21.8 million instead?
Answer: 2019

Question: What would the change in Foreign in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $11.9 million instead?
Answer: -8

Question: What would the percentage change in Foreign in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $11.9 million instead?
Answer: -40.2
ACQUISITIONS National Storage has successfully transacted 35 acquisitions and 4 development sites in FY19 and continues to pursue high-quality acquisitions across Australia and New Zealand. The ability to acquire and integrate strategic accretive acquisitions is one of National Storage’s major competitive advantages and a cornerstone of its growth strategy. This active growth strategy also strengthens and scales the National Storage operating platform which drives efficiencies across the business. WINE ARK Wine Ark, Australia’s largest wine storage provider is part of the National Storage group and houses over two million bottles of fine wine across 15 centres for clients located in over 30 countries. There are few businesses in Australia with more experience when it comes to storing and managing premium wine. Throughout FY19 Wine Ark continued to strengthen its relationship and involvement in the greater wine trade supporting the Wine Communicators of Australia, Sommeliers Association of Australia, Wine Australia and Commanderie de Bordeaux (Australian Chapter). <table> <tbody> <tr><td>REGION</td><td>NUMBER OF CENTRES</td><td>TOTAL NLA</td></tr> <tr><td>Brisbane</td><td>5</td><td>25,000</td></tr> <tr><td>Gold Coast</td><td>4</td><td>6,500</td></tr> <tr><td>Sunshine Coast</td><td>1</td><td>6,500</td></tr> <tr><td>Central Coast (NSW)</td><td>6</td><td>20,600</td></tr> <tr><td>Wollongong</td><td>3</td><td>12,700</td></tr> <tr><td>Melbourne</td><td>2</td><td>8,600</td></tr> <tr><td>Adelaide</td><td>3</td><td>15,500</td></tr> <tr><td>Perth</td><td>2</td><td>10,800</td></tr> <tr><td>Auckland (NZ)</td><td>3</td><td>27,000</td></tr> <tr><td>Hamilton (NZ)</td><td>4</td><td>21,600</td></tr> <tr><td>Rotorua (NZ)</td><td>1</td><td>5,000</td></tr> <tr><td>Tauranga (NZ)</td><td>1</td><td>3,200</td></tr> <tr><td>Total Acquisitions</td><td>35</td><td>163,000</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If number of centres in Gold Cost were 6, what would be the sum of centres in Brisbane and Gold Coast?
Answer: 11

Question: If total NLA in Brisbane were 10,000, what would be the difference in the NLA between Sunshine Coast and Brisbane?
Answer: 3500

Question: If NLA in Gold Coast was 5,000, what would be the average of Sunshine Coast and Gold Coast?
Answer: 5750
A discussion of net sales by reportable segment is presented below for the indicated fiscal years (in millions): AMER. Net sales for fiscal 2019 in the AMER segment increased $210.4 million, or 17.3%, as compared to fiscal 2018. The increase in net sales was driven by a $181.7 million increase in production ramps of new products for existing customers, a $13.5 million increase in production ramps for new customers and overall net increased customer end-market demand. The increase was partially offset by a $16.4 million decrease for end-of-life products and a $6.0 million reduction due to disengagements with customers. APAC. Net sales for fiscal 2019 in the APAC segment increased $59.2 million, or 4.0%, as compared to fiscal 2018. The increase in net sales was driven by an $87.3 million increase in production ramps of new products for existing customers and a $58.1 million increase in production ramps for new customers. The increase was partially offset by a $28.4 million reduction due to a disengagement with a customer, a $7.3 million decrease for end-of-life products and overall net decreased customer end-market demand. EMEA. Net sales for fiscal 2019 in the EMEA segment increased $28.4 million, or 10.1%, as compared to fiscal 2018. The increase in net sales was the result of a $20.2 million increase in production ramps of new products for existing customers, a $4.2 million increase in production ramps for new customers and overall net increased customer end-market demand. The increase was partially offset by a $6.2 million reduction due to a disengagement with a customer. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Net sales:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>AMER</td><td>$1,429.3</td><td>$1,218.9</td></tr> <tr><td>APAC</td><td>1,557.2</td><td>1,498.0</td></tr> <tr><td>EMEA</td><td>309.9</td><td>281.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Elimination of inter-segment sales</td><td>(132.0)</td><td>(124.9)</td></tr> <tr><td>Total net sales</td><td>3,164.4</td><td>2,873.5</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: How many years did net sales from APAC exceed $1,500 million if the net sales from APAC in 2018 was $2,000 million instead?
Answer: 2

Question: What would be the difference in net sales in 2018 between AMER and EMEA regions if the net sales from EMEA was $1,000 million instead?
Answer: 218.9

Question: What would be the percentage change in the Elimination of inter-segment sales between 2018 and 2019 if the Elimination of inter-segment sales in 2019 was -$100 million instead?
Answer: -19.94
9 Profit / (loss) on Ordinary Activities The profit (2018: loss) on ordinary activities before taxation is stated after charging: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year-ended 31 March 2019</td><td>Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$M</td><td>$M</td></tr> <tr><td>Depreciation of property, plant and equipment</td><td>11.8</td><td>11.6</td></tr> <tr><td>Amortisation of intangible assets</td><td>16.9</td><td>25.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Research and development expenditure</td><td>(143.9)</td><td>(140.3)</td></tr> <tr><td>Operating lease rentals:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Property</td><td>14.0</td><td>12.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>1.6</td><td>1.6</td></tr> <tr><td>Pension scheme contributions</td><td>8.9</td><td>8.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Impairment of trade receivables</td><td>0.6</td><td>0.6</td></tr> <tr><td>Net foreign currency differences</td><td>(1.5)</td><td>6.9</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the amount of Property be larger if the amount in 2018 was $14.5 million instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in the amount of Property in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $14.5 million instead?
Answer: 2

Question: What would the percentage change in the amount of Property in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $14.5 million instead?
Answer: 16
14 Taxation UK corporation tax for the year-ended 31 March 2019 is calculated at 19% (2018: 19%) of the estimated assessable loss for the period. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year-ended 31 March 2019</td><td>Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$M</td><td>$M</td></tr> <tr><td>Current income tax:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>UK corporation tax</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Adjustments in respect of previous years UK tax</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr> <tr><td>Overseas tax before exceptional items</td><td>22.2</td><td>23.0</td></tr> <tr><td>Adjustment in respect of previous years</td><td>13.1</td><td>10.2</td></tr> <tr><td>Total current tax charge</td><td>36.9</td><td>34.7</td></tr> <tr><td>Deferred tax:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Origination and reversal of temporary differences</td><td>2.5</td><td>(16.7)</td></tr> <tr><td>Impact of changes in US tax rate</td><td>-</td><td>5.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Adjustment in respect of previous years</td><td>(12.7)</td><td>(3.5)</td></tr> <tr><td>Total deferred tax credit</td><td>(10.2)</td><td>(14.8)</td></tr> <tr><td>Total income tax charge</td><td>26.7</td><td>19.9</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the total income tax charge be larger if the amount in 2019 was $16.7 million instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in Total income tax charge in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $26.9 million instead?
Answer: 7

Question: What would the percentage change in Total income tax charge in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $26.9 million instead?
Answer: 35.18
Operating Income (Loss) by Business Unit Percentages reflect operating income (loss) as a percentage of revenue for each business unit. CNBU operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018 primarily due to declines in pricing and higher R&D costs, partially offset by cost reductions. MBU operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018 primarily due to declines in pricing partially offset by increases in sales of high-value managed NAND products and manufacturing cost reductions. SBU operating margin for 2019 declined from 2018 primarily due to declines in pricing, which were partially offset by manufacturing cost reductions and increases in sales volumes. SBU operating results for 2019 and 2018 were adversely impacted by the underutilization charges at IMFT. EBU operating income for 2019 decreased from 2018 as a result of declines in pricing and higher R&D costs partially offset by manufacturing cost reductions and increases in sales volumes. CNBU operating income for 2018 improved from 2017 primarily due to improved pricing and higher sales volumes resulting from strong demand for our products combined with manufacturing cost reductions. MBU operating income for 2018 improved from 2017 primarily due to increases in pricing and sales volumes for LPDRAM products, higher sales of high-value managed NAND products, and manufacturing cost reductions. SBU operating income for 2018 improved from 2017 primarily due to manufacturing cost reductions enabled by our execution in transitioning to 64-layer TLC 3D NAND products and improvements in product mix. SBU operating income for 2018 was adversely impacted by higher costs associated with IMFT's production of 3D XPoint memory products at less than full capacity. EBU operating income for 2018 increased as compared to 2017 as a result of increases in average selling prices, manufacturing cost reductions, and increases in sales volumes, partially offset by higher R&D costs. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>For the year ended</td><td>2019</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>CNBU</td><td>$4,645</td><td>47%</td><td>$9,773</td><td>64%</td><td>$3,755</td><td>44%</td></tr> <tr><td>MBU</td><td>2,606</td><td>41%</td><td>3,033</td><td>46%</td><td>927</td><td>21%</td></tr> <tr><td>SBU</td><td>(386)</td><td>(10)%</td><td>964</td><td>19%</td><td>552</td><td>12%</td></tr> <tr><td>EBU</td><td>923</td><td>29%</td><td>1,473</td><td>42%</td><td>975</td><td>36%</td></tr> <tr><td>All Other</td><td>13</td><td>18%</td><td>—</td><td>—%</td><td>23</td><td>35%</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$7,801</td><td></td><td>$15,243</td><td></td><td>$6,232</td><td></td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If EBU operating income in 2018 was 1,000, what would be the difference between EBU operating income in 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 25

Question: What would be the ratio of CNBU and MBU total operating income in 2019 to those in 2018 if MBU operating income in 2018 was 2,000?
Answer: 0.62

Question: How much would the difference in the total operating income in 2018 compared to in 2017 be if total operating income in 2017 was $20,000?
Answer: 4757
<table> <tbody> <tr><td>(In millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Year Ended June 30,</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Server products and cloud services</td><td>$ 32,622</td><td>$ 26,129</td><td>$ 21,649</td></tr> <tr><td>Office products and cloud services</td><td>31,769</td><td>28,316</td><td>25,573</td></tr> <tr><td>Windows</td><td>20,395</td><td>19,518</td><td>18,593</td></tr> <tr><td>Gaming</td><td>11,386</td><td>10,353</td><td>9,051</td></tr> <tr><td>Search advertising</td><td>7,628</td><td>7,012</td><td>6,219</td></tr> <tr><td>LinkedIn</td><td>6,754</td><td>5,259</td><td>2,271</td></tr> <tr><td>Enterprise Services</td><td>6,124</td><td>5,846</td><td>5,542</td></tr> <tr><td>Devices</td><td>6,095</td><td>5,134</td><td>5,062</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>3,070</td><td>2,793</td><td>2,611</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 125,843</td><td>$ 110,360</td><td>$ 96,571</td></tr> </tbody> </table> Revenue from external customers, classified by significant product and service offerings, was as follows: Our commercial cloud revenue, which includes Office 365 Commercial, Azure, the commercial portion of LinkedIn, Dynamics 365, and other commercial cloud properties, was $38.1 billion, $26.6 billion and $16.2 billion in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. These amounts are primarily included in Office products and cloud services, Server products and cloud services, and LinkedIn in the table above.

Question: How many revenue items are there, if "Devices" is not a revenue item?
Answer: 8

Question: How much of the total revenue in 2019 did not come from commercial cloud revenue, if the total revenue in 2019 was 225,843 million?
Answer: 187743

Question: Which were the bottom 2 revenue items for 2017, if the LinkedIn revenue in 2017 was $5,500 million instead?
Answer: Devices, Other