Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Valuations of Stock Awards We estimated the fair values of our restricted stock-based awards that are solely subject to service-based vesting requirements based upon their market values as of the grant dates, discounted for the present values of expected dividends. The fair values of our PSUs were also measured based upon their market values as of their respective grant dates, discounted for the present values of expected dividends. The vesting conditions and related terms of our PSUs were communicated to each participating employee as of their respective grant dates and included attainment metrics that were defined, fixed and based upon consistent U.S. GAAP metrics or internal metrics that are defined, fixed and consistently determined, and that require the employee to render service. Therefore, these awards met the performance-based award classification criteria as defined within ASC 718. We estimated the fair values of our stock options that were solely subject to service-based vesting requirements using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair values of stock options. Option valuation models, including the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, require the input of assumptions, including stock price volatility. Changes in the input assumptions can affect the fair value estimates and ultimately how much we recognize as stock-based compensation expense. The fair values of our stock options were estimated at the grant dates or at the acquisition dates for options assumed in a business combination. The weighted-average input assumptions used and resulting fair values of our service-based stock options were as follows for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017. The expected life input is based on historical exercise patterns and post-vesting termination behavior, the risk-free interest rate input is based on U.S. Treasury instruments, the annualized dividend yield input is based on the per share dividend declared by the Board, and the volatility input is calculated based on the implied volatility of our publicly traded options. We estimated the fair values of the PSOs granted during fiscal 2018 at approximately $10 per share using a Monte Carlo simulation approach as of the grant date with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.14%, expected term of seven years, expected volatility of 22.44% and dividend yield of 1.49%. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Year Ended May 31,</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Expected life (in years)</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.7</td><td>4.8</td></tr> <tr><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.7%</td><td>2.0%</td><td>1.0%</td></tr> <tr><td>Volatility</td><td>24%</td><td>22%</td><td>23%</td></tr> <tr><td>Dividend yield</td><td>1.7%</td><td>1.5%</td><td>1.5%</td></tr> <tr><td>Weighted-average fair value per share</td><td>$10.77</td><td>$9.34</td><td>$8.18</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: When the dividend yield for 2017 was updated to be 1.8%, what is the new average dividend yield for the 3 years from 2017 to 2019?
Answer: 1.6

Question: When the risk-free interest rate for 2018 is changed to 2.5%,  what is the new average risk-free interest rate over the 3 year period from 2017 to 2019?
Answer: 2.07

Question: How many assumptions used by the company when using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model are based on internal company data?
Answer: 3