aveni-ai/aveni-bench-tat-hqa huggingface dataset:
Our restaurant leases generally provide for fixed rental payments (with cost-of-living index adjustments) plus real estate taxes, insurance, and other expenses. In addition, approximately 14% of our leases provide for contingent rental payments between 1% and 15% of the restaurant’s gross sales once certain thresholds are met. We have generally been able to renew our restaurant leases as they expire at then-current market rates. The remaining terms of ground leases range from less than one year to 49 years, including optional renewal periods. The remaining lease terms of our other leases range from less thanone year to 56 years, including optional renewal periods. As of September 29, 2019, our restaurant leases had initial terms expiring as follows: Our principal executive offices are located in San Diego, California in an owned facility of approximately 150,000 square feet. We also own our 70,000 square foot Innovation Center and approximately four acres of undeveloped land directly adjacent to it. We plan to sell our principal executive offices and consolidate our headquarters in the Innovation Center, which we believe will be suitable and adequate for our purposes. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Number of Restaurants</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Land and</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>Ground</td><td>Building</td></tr> <tr><td>Fiscal Year</td><td>Leases</td><td>Leases</td></tr> <tr><td>2020 – 2024</td><td>381</td><td>697</td></tr> <tr><td>2025 – 2029</td><td>198</td><td>270</td></tr> <tr><td>2030 – 2034</td><td>40</td><td>135</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: From fiscal year 2020 - 2024, what is the difference in the number of ground leases and land and building leases expiring if the number of ground leases expiring is 400 instead?
Answer: 297

Question: From fiscal year 2025 - 2029, what is the total number of ground leases and land and building leases expiring in total if the number of ground leases is 300 instead?
Answer: 570

Question: What is the difference of ground leases expiring between the periods 2020 - 2024 and 2025 - 2029 if the number of ground leases expiring in 2020 - 2024 is 400 instead?
Answer: 202
(6) INTANGIBLE ASSETS Identifiable intangible assets as of June 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows: The weighted average remaining amortization period for the Company’s customer relationships asset is 14.3 years. The Company has determined that certain underlying rights (including easements) and the certifications have indefinite lives. The amortization period for underlying rights (including easements) is 13.0 years. The amortization of intangible assets for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $95.1 million, $97.2 million, and $80.0 million, respectively. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Gross Carrying Amount</td><td>Accumulated Amortization</td><td>Net</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>(in millions)</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>June 30, 2019</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Finite-Lived Intangible Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Customer relationships</td><td>$1,597.6</td><td>$(498.7)</td><td>$1,098.9</td></tr> <tr><td>Underlying rights and other</td><td>3.4</td><td>(1.5)</td><td>1.9</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>1,601.0</td><td>(500.2)</td><td>1,100.8</td></tr> <tr><td>Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Certifications</td><td>3.5</td><td>—</td><td>3.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Underlying rights and other</td><td>14.5</td><td>—</td><td>14.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>1,619.0</td><td>(500.2)</td><td>1,118.8</td></tr> <tr><td>June 30, 2018</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Finite-Lived Intangible Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Customer relationships</td><td>$1,597.0</td><td>$(405.6)</td><td>$1,191.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Underlying rights and other</td><td>2.7</td><td>(0.6)</td><td>2.1</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>1,599.7</td><td>(406.2)</td><td>1,193.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Certifications</td><td>3.5</td><td>—</td><td>3.5</td></tr> <tr><td>Underlying rights and other</td><td>15.1</td><td>—</td><td>15.1</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>$1,618.3</td><td>$(406.2)</td><td>$1,212.1</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What was the total accumulated amortization for June 30, 2017, if the amortization of intangible assets for the year ended 2018 was $95.2 million instead?
Answer: 311

Question: How many types of finite-Lived Intangible Assets and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets are there?
Answer: 4

Question: What is the total net underlying rights and other for both finite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2019, if the net Indefinite-Lived underlying rights were $16.5 million instead?
Answer: 18.4
Consumer Cyber Safety segment Revenue increased $616 million due to a $639 million increase in revenue from sales of our identity and information protection products acquired at the end of fiscal 2017, offset by a $23 million decrease in revenue related to our consumer security products. Our revenue growth reflects the benefit of the shift to subscription-based contracts and bundling of our consumer products, which is helping to mitigate the trend of declining revenues from sales of stand-alone security products. Operating income increased $272 million primarily due to sales of our identity and information protection products, partially offset by higher related cost of sales and operating expenses. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Fiscal Year</td><td></td><td>Variance in</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>(In millions, except for percentages)</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>Dollar</td><td>Percent</td></tr> <tr><td>Net revenues</td><td>$2,280</td><td>$1,664</td><td>$616</td><td>37%</td></tr> <tr><td>Percentage of total net revenues</td><td>47%</td><td>41%</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Operating income</td><td>$1,111</td><td>$839</td><td>$272</td><td>32%</td></tr> <tr><td>Operating margin</td><td>49%</td><td>50%</td><td></td><td></td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If Net revenue for Fiscal 2018 was $3,000 million instead, What would be the Total net revenue for fiscal 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 4664

Question: If Net revenue for Fiscal 2018 was $3,000 million instead, What would be the average net revenue for fiscal year 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 2332

Question: If Fiscal 2018 Operating income was $2,000 million, What would be the average Operating income for Fiscal 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 1419.5
The following table summarizes the components of the intangible assets acquired and their estimated useful lives by VMware in conjunction with the acquisition (amounts in table in millions): The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The estimated fair value assigned to the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities were based on management's estimates and assumptions. The initial allocation of the purchase price was based on preliminary valuations and assumptions and is subject to change within the measurement period, including current and non-current income taxes payable and deferred taxes as additional information is received and tax returns are finalized. VMware expects to finalize the allocation of the purchase price within the measurement period. Management expects that goodwill and identifiable intangible assets will not be deductible for tax purposes. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Weighted-Average Useful Lives (in years)</td><td>Fair Value Amount</td></tr> <tr><td>Purchased technology</td><td>4.2</td><td>$232</td></tr> <tr><td>Customer relationships and customer lists</td><td>7.0</td><td>215</td></tr> <tr><td>Trademarks and tradenames</td><td>5.0</td><td>25</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>2.0</td><td>20</td></tr> <tr><td>Total definite-lived intangible assets</td><td></td><td>$492</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the fair value amount of Other intangible assets as a percentage of total intangible assets acquired if the total was $600 million instead and Other intangible assets remained unchanged?
Answer: 3.33

Question: What would be difference in the fair value amount between purchased technology and trademarks and tradenames if Trademarks and tradenames was $200 million instead?
Answer: 32

Question: What would be the difference in the Weighted-Average Useful Lives between Trademarks and tradenames and Other intangible assets if Other intangible assets had a weighted-average useful life of 4.0 years instead?
Answer: 1
Cash Flow Hedges For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of AOCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings or it becomes probable the forecasted transactions will not occur. The following is a summary of the gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges recognized during the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivatives</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Years Ended June 30,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>($ in millions)</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr> <tr><td>Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Commodity contracts</td><td>$45.4</td><td>$41.4</td><td>$9.4</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign exchange contracts</td><td>(0.9)</td><td>(0.4)</td><td>(0.1)</td></tr> <tr><td>Total</td><td>$44.5</td><td>$41.0</td><td>$9.3</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would the amount of commodity contracts be the largest if the amount in 2017 was $49.4 million instead?
Answer: 2017

Question: What would the change in the Total amount in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $45.0 million instead?
Answer: 4

Question: What would the percentage change in the Total amount in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $45.0 million instead?
Answer: 9.76
Cash Flow Information Cash flows in foreign currencies have been converted to U.S. Dollars at an approximate weighted-average exchange rate for the respective reporting periods. The weighted-average exchange rates for the consolidated statements of operations were as follows: <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>Years ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Swedish Krona</td><td>9.46</td><td>8.70</td></tr> <tr><td>Japanese Yen</td><td>109.01</td><td>110.43</td></tr> <tr><td>South Korean Won</td><td>1,165.70</td><td>1,100.50</td></tr> <tr><td>Taiwan Dollar</td><td>30.90</td><td>30.15</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: Which foreign currency would have the highest weighted-average exchange rate to the U.S. Dollars in 2019 if the exchange rate of the Indonesian Rupiah was 14,000?
Answer: Indonesian Rupiah

Question: What would be the percentage change of the Japanese Yen exchange rate from 2018 to 2019 if the weighted-average exchange rate in 2018 was 95.90?
Answer: 13.67

Question: What would be the ratio of the weighted average exchange rate of Swedish Krona to Taiwan Dollar for the year ended December 31, 2019, if the exchange rate of Swedish Krona was 10.50?
Answer: 0.34
Note 15. Deferred Charges and Other Assets Deferred charges and other assets consisted of the following (in thousands): <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>December 31,</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr> <tr><td>Trade accounts receivable, net, noncurrent (Note 2)</td><td>$26,496</td><td>$15,948</td></tr> <tr><td>Equity method investments (Note 1)</td><td>9,254</td><td>9,702</td></tr> <tr><td>Net deferred tax assets, noncurrent (Note 20)</td><td>6,774</td><td>5,797</td></tr> <tr><td>Rent and other deposits</td><td>6,106</td><td>5,687</td></tr> <tr><td>Value added tax receivables, net, noncurrent</td><td>592</td><td>519</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>6,723</td><td>5,711</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$55,945</td><td>$43,364</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: In which year would Value added tax receivables, net, noncurrent be larger if the amount in 2019 was $492 thousand instead?
Answer: 2018

Question: What would the change in Value added tax receivables, net, noncurrent in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $589 thousand instead?
Answer: 70

Question: What would the percentage change in Value added tax receivables, net, noncurrent in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was $589 thousand instead?
Answer: 13.49
Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan During Fiscal 2017 and in the context of acquisitions made in Fiscal 2017, we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations (collectively referred to as the Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan). The Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations. These charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries. Our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition, requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded. On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate. Since the inception of the plan, $41.9 million has been recorded within "Special charges (recoveries)". We do not expect to incur any further significant charges relating to this plan. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 is shown below. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan</td><td>Workforce reduction</td><td>Facility costs</td><td>Total</td></tr> <tr><td>Balance payable as at June 30, 2017</td><td>$10,045</td><td>$1,369</td><td>$11,414</td></tr> <tr><td>Accruals and adjustments</td><td>3,432</td><td>3,775</td><td>7,207</td></tr> <tr><td>Cash payments</td><td>(12,342)</td><td>(1,627)</td><td>(13,969)</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments</td><td>455</td><td>(86)</td><td>369</td></tr> <tr><td>Balance payable as at June 30, 2018</td><td>$1,590</td><td>$3,431</td><td>$5,021</td></tr> <tr><td>Accruals and adjustments</td><td>(254)</td><td>1,152</td><td>898</td></tr> <tr><td>Cash payments</td><td>(213)</td><td>(1,290)</td><td>(1,503)</td></tr> <tr><td>Foreign exchange and other non-cash adjustments</td><td>(77)</td><td>(344)</td><td>(421)</td></tr> <tr><td>Balance payable as at June 30, 2019</td><td>$1,046</td><td>$2,949</td><td>$3,995</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If For Balance payable as at June 30, 2019, Workforce reduction was 2,000(in thousands) instead, What is the difference between Workforce reduction and Facility costs?
Answer: -949

Question: For Balance payable as at June 30, 2019, if Workforce reduction was 1,200(in thousands) instead, what is Workforce reduction expressed as a percentage of Facility costs?
Answer: 40.69

Question: If the total Balance payable as at June 30, 2019 was 5,000(in thousands) instead, What is the difference between total Balance payable as at June 30, 2019 as compared to total Balance payable as at June 30, 2017?
Answer: -6414
NOTE 4-BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS The Company recorded depreciation and amortization expense of $1.2 million, $1.3 million and $1.4 million for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. No interest was capitalized for any period presented. Fiscal year 2019 depreciation and amortization of $1.2 million includes $32,000 of amortization of capitalized internal-use software. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td>December 29, 2019</td><td>December 30, 2018</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>(in thousands)</td></tr> <tr><td>Inventories:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Raw material</td><td>$222</td><td>$191</td></tr> <tr><td>Work-in-process</td><td>2,370</td><td>2,929</td></tr> <tr><td>Finished goods</td><td>668</td><td>716</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$3,260</td><td>$3,836</td></tr> <tr><td>Other current assets:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Prepaid expenses</td><td>$1,296</td><td>$1,483</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>269</td><td>292</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$1,565</td><td>$1,775</td></tr> <tr><td>Property and equipment:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Equipment</td><td>$10,694</td><td>$10,607</td></tr> <tr><td>Software</td><td>1,789</td><td>2,788</td></tr> <tr><td>Furniture and fixtures</td><td>36</td><td>42</td></tr> <tr><td>Leasehold improvements</td><td>474</td><td>712</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>12,993</td><td>14,149</td></tr> <tr><td>Accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>(12,163)</td><td>(12,700)</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$830</td><td>$1,449</td></tr> <tr><td>Capitalized internal-use software:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Capitalized during the year</td><td>$365</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Accumulated amortization</td><td>(32)</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$333</td><td>—</td></tr> <tr><td>Accrued liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Employee compensation related accruals</td><td>713</td><td>1,154</td></tr> <tr><td>Other</td><td>420</td><td>749</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>$1,133</td><td>$1,903</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would be the percentage change in the value of raw materials between 2018 and 2019 if the value of raw materials in 2019 is increased by $5,000?
Answer: 18.85

Question: What would be the percentage change in the value of work-in-process inventory between 2018 and 2019 if the value in 2019 is increased by 10%?
Answer: -10.99

Question: What would be the percentage change in the value of finished goods between 2018 and 2019 if the value in 2019 is instead $750,000?
Answer: 4.75
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES. Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Principal Accountant Fees and Services The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co., a Firm in the Deloitte Global Network (“Deloitte”) for the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte during those periods. (1) Audit fees are comprised of fees for professional services performed by Deloitte for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as other services provided by Deloitte in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. (2) Tax fees are comprised of fees for preparation of tax returns to the Company and the services performed by Deloitte in connection with Inter-Company matters. We did not use Deloitte for financial information system design and implementation. These services, which include designing or implementing a system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements and generates information that is significant to our financial statements, are provided internally or by other service providers. We did not engage Deloitte to provide compliance outsourcing services. <table> <tbody> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>December 31,</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td></tr> <tr><td>Audit Fees (1)</td><td>$58,000</td><td>$55,000</td></tr> <tr><td>Audit-Related Fees</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td></tr> <tr><td>Tax Fees (2)</td><td>$28,000</td><td>$11,000</td></tr> <tr><td>All Other Fees</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td></tr> <tr><td>Total Fees</td><td>$86,000</td><td>$66,000</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: What would the total amount of audit fees in both 2018 and 2019 be if the amount in 2018 was 60,000 instead?
Answer: 115000

Question: What would the percentage change in tax fees from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was 12,000 instead?
Answer: -57.14

Question: What would the percentage of audit fees in total fees in 2019 be if the audit fee was 60,000 instead?
Answer: 84.51
We measure and report our annual scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions. As part of our commitment to reduce our Greenhouse Gas (‘GHG’) emissions, we moved to a certified green tariff renewable electricity supply contract for our UK operations from the beginning of the financial year. The GHG emissions summary below shows our gross emissions including location-based scope 2 emissions, as well as our net emissions accounting for the market-based scope 2 reporting for our certified green electricity tariff. The reduction in emissions is driven by continued progress in energy efficiency, a reduction in emissions associated with refrigerants as we continue to move away from fluorinated gas refrigerants, and the general reduction in UK grid carbon factor as more renewables make up a greater proportion of the fuel mix. Over the last six years, we have made good progress in our water consumption per tonne of product, reducing it by 15% over the period. There was also a significant improvement in FY19, and one of the contributing factors to the improvement was the closure of the Evercreech desserts facility which had a higher water intensity than most sites within the business. * Our GHG emissions have been calculated using the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, and emissions factors from DEFRA’s UK government GHG conversion factors for company reporting (where factors have not been provided directly by a supplier). ** UK & Ireland only – comparable with FY19 Group structure. *** Full Group including US business. <table> <tbody> <tr><td>Emissions are summarised below, all reported as CO2 equivalent (‘CO2e’)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td></td><td>Emissions reported in tonnes CO2e*</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>Emissions from:</td><td>FY19**</td><td>FY18**</td><td>FY18***</td></tr> <tr><td>Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities (Scope 1)</td><td>59,495</td><td>66,336</td><td>75,600</td></tr> <tr><td>Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own use (Scope 2)</td><td>27,633</td><td>32,389</td><td>67,754</td></tr> <tr><td>Total gross emissions (Scope 1 and 2)</td><td>87,128</td><td>98,725</td><td>143,354</td></tr> <tr><td>Green tariff</td><td>-27,603</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr> <tr><td>Total net emissions (Scope 1 and 2)</td><td>59,525</td><td>98,725</td><td>143,354</td></tr> <tr><td>Ratio (KgCO2e per £1 sales revenue)</td><td>0.060</td><td>0.066</td><td>0.056</td></tr> </tbody> </table>

Question: If Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities (Scope 1) in FY19 was 70,000, what would be the change in the Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities (Scope 1) from FY18 to FY19 for UK and Ireland only?
Answer: 3664

Question: If Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own use (Scope 2) in FY19 was 35,000, what would be the average Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own use (Scope 2) for FY18 and FY19 for UK and Ireland only?
Answer: 33694.5

Question: If Green tariff in FY18 was -25,000, what would be the change in the Green tariff from FY18 to FY19 for UK and Ireland only?
Answer: -2603