aveni-ai/aveni-bench-finqa huggingface dataset:
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

1	in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
2	beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
3	purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
4	disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
5	accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
6	builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
7	increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
8	fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
9	balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: in 2010 what was the percentage change of the carrying amount of loan receivable net of the allowance
Answer: -0.52485
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

1	12/31/2011	12/31/2012	12/31/2013	12/31/2014	12/31/2015	12/31/2016
2	lkq corporation	$ 100	$ 140	$ 219	$ 187	$ 197	$ 204
3	s&p 500 index	$ 100	$ 113	$ 147	$ 164	$ 163	$ 178
4	peer group	$ 100	$ 111	$ 140	$ 177	$ 188	$ 217

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative return for lkq corporation for the five years ended 12/31/2016?
Answer: 1.04
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

1	2007 program	2003 program	2001 program	total
2	liability at december 31 2006	$ 2014	$ 12.6	$ 19.2	$ 31.8
3	net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments	19.1	-0.5 ( 0.5 )	-5.2 ( 5.2 )	13.4
4	payments and other1	-7.2 ( 7.2 )	-3.1 ( 3.1 )	-5.3 ( 5.3 )	-15.6 ( 15.6 )
5	liability at december 31 2007	$ 11.9	$ 9.0	$ 8.7	$ 29.6
6	net charges and adjustments	4.3	0.8	0.7	5.8
7	payments and other1	-15.0 ( 15.0 )	-4.1 ( 4.1 )	-3.5 ( 3.5 )	-22.6 ( 22.6 )
8	liability at december 31 2008	$ 1.2	$ 5.7	$ 5.9	$ 12.8

1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Question: what is the percentage decrease in total liability from dec 31 2007 to dec 31 2008?
Answer: 56.75676
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

1	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
2	ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
3	dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
4	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
5	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
6	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation for the five year period ending 12/31/10?
Answer: 0.7893
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

1	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
2	ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
3	dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
4	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
5	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
6	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

.

Question: did the five year total return on ball corporation outperform the dj containers & packaging index?
Answer: 1
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

1	2002	2001	2000
2	net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
3	generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
4	capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in non-utility nuclear earnings in 2002
Answer: 0.57031
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .

1	2010	high	low
2	quarter ended march 31	$ 44.61	$ 40.10
3	quarter ended june 30	45.33	38.86
4	quarter ended september 30	52.11	43.70
5	quarter ended december 31	53.14	49.61
6	2009	high	low
7	quarter ended march 31	$ 32.53	$ 25.45
8	quarter ended june 30	34.52	27.93
9	quarter ended september 30	37.71	29.89
10	quarter ended december 31	43.84	35.03

on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders . dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock . payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status . in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: on february 112011 what was the market capitalization
Answer: 22556579533.35
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

1	balance december 31 2002	$ 450697000
2	additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	68125000
3	deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-4645000 ( 4645000 )
4	balance december 31 2003	514177000
5	additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	82551000
6	deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-1390000 ( 1390000 )
7	balance december 31 2004	595338000
8	additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	83656000
9	deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-15244000 ( 15244000 )
10	balance december 31 2005	$ 663750000

.

Question: what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year during 2005 and 2004?
Answer: 0.11491
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

1	cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
2	cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
3	cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
4	cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
5	net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 0.08237
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
3	volume/weather	15.5
4	net gas revenue	6.6
5	rider revenue	3.9
6	base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
7	other	7.0
8	2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Question: what percent of the change between net revenue in 2007 and 2008 was due to rider revenue?
Answer: 0.17972