aveni-ai/aveni-bench-finqa huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
3	volume/weather	18.9
4	other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
5	2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: what was the percentage change in net revenue in 2011
Answer: 555.3
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2016 net revenue	$ 1520.5
3	retail electric price	33.8
4	opportunity sales	5.6
5	asset retirement obligation	-14.8 ( 14.8 )
6	volume/weather	-29.0 ( 29.0 )
7	other	6.5
8	2017 net revenue	$ 1522.6

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Answer: 1521.55
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Answer: -31.86
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

1	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
2	united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
3	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
4	dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: for the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 13.9
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
3	reserve equalization	14.3
4	purchased power capacity	12.4
5	transmission revenue	7.0
6	retail electric price	5.4
7	net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
8	other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
9	2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
Answer: 0.01099
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

1	cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
2	cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
3	cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
4	cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
5	net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the cost per car for the buyout of locomotives in 2012?
Answer: 454545.45455
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

1	in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
2	beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
3	purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
4	disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
5	accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
6	builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
7	increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
8	fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
9	balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: at december 31 , 2010 what was the percent of the net allowance to the the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio
Answer: 0.19643
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

1	in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
2	beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
3	purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
4	disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
5	accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
6	builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
7	increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
8	fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
9	balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: what is the percentage of allowance of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?
Answer: 0.16418
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2010 net revenue	$ 540.2
3	retail electric price	36.0
4	volume/weather	21.3
5	purchased power capacity	-24.6 ( 24.6 )
6	other	4.9
7	2011 net revenue	$ 577.8

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year . usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

Question: what percent of of the total variance in net revenue is attributed to the variance in volume/weather?
Answer: 0.56649
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

1	quarter ended	2002 high	2002 low	2002 dividend	2002 high	2002 low	dividend
2	december 31	$ 25.84	$ 21.50	$ .455	$ 24.80	$ 22.00	$ .45
3	september 30	28.88	21.40	.455	26.17	21.60	.45
4	june 30	28.95	25.46	.450	24.99	22.00	.43
5	march 31	26.50	22.92	.450	25.44	21.85	.43

.

Question: what is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended december 31 2002?
Answer: 1.11111