aveni-ai/aveni-bench-convfinqa huggingface dataset:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

1	cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
2	cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
3	cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
4	cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
5	net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the value included in the capital investments for buyout of locomotives in 2012, in dollars? and how many locomotives were bought with that value?
Previous answers: 75000000.0 165.0
Question: what was, then, the average cost of each one of those locomotives?
Answer: 454545.45455
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

1	in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
2	beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
3	purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
4	disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
5	accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
6	builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
7	increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
8	fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
9	balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: in the year of 2010, what percentage did the net allowance represent in relation to the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio?
Answer: 0.19643
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

1	in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
2	beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
3	purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
4	disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
5	accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
6	builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
7	increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
8	fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
9	balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Previous questions in this conversation: in the year of 2010, what percentage did the net allowance represent in relation to the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio?
Previous answers: 0.19643
Question: and what was the combined total of this net allowance and the carrying amount?
Answer: 469
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

1	in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
2	beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
3	purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
4	disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
5	accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
6	builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
7	increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
8	fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
9	balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Previous questions in this conversation: in the year of 2010, what percentage did the net allowance represent in relation to the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio? and what was the combined total of this net allowance and the carrying amount?
Previous answers: 0.19643 469.0
Question: what percentage did this total represent in relation to the carrying amount?
Answer: 0.16418
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2010 net revenue	$ 540.2
3	retail electric price	36.0
4	volume/weather	21.3
5	purchased power capacity	-24.6 ( 24.6 )
6	other	4.9
7	2011 net revenue	$ 577.8

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year . usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

Question: what was the total variance in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 37.6
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2010 net revenue	$ 540.2
3	retail electric price	36.0
4	volume/weather	21.3
5	purchased power capacity	-24.6 ( 24.6 )
6	other	4.9
7	2011 net revenue	$ 577.8

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year . usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the total variance in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Previous answers: 37.6
Question: and what was the variance in volume/weather in that same period?
Answer: 21.3
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2010 net revenue	$ 540.2
3	retail electric price	36.0
4	volume/weather	21.3
5	purchased power capacity	-24.6 ( 24.6 )
6	other	4.9
7	2011 net revenue	$ 577.8

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year . usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the total variance in net revenue from 2010 to 2011? and what was the variance in volume/weather in that same period?
Previous answers: 37.6 21.3
Question: how much, then, does this volume/weather variance represent in relation to the net revenue one, in percentage?
Answer: 0.56649
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

1	quarter ended	2002 high	2002 low	2002 dividend	2002 high	2002 low	dividend
2	december 31	$ 25.84	$ 21.50	$ .455	$ 24.80	$ 22.00	$ .45
3	september 30	28.88	21.40	.455	26.17	21.60	.45
4	june 30	28.95	25.46	.450	24.99	22.00	.43
5	march 31	26.50	22.92	.450	25.44	21.85	.43

.

Question: what was the cash dividend per share in the last quarter of 2002?
Answer: 0.455
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

1	quarter ended	2002 high	2002 low	2002 dividend	2002 high	2002 low	dividend
2	december 31	$ 25.84	$ 21.50	$ .455	$ 24.80	$ 22.00	$ .45
3	september 30	28.88	21.40	.455	26.17	21.60	.45
4	june 30	28.95	25.46	.450	24.99	22.00	.43
5	march 31	26.50	22.92	.450	25.44	21.85	.43

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the cash dividend per share in the last quarter of 2002?
Previous answers: 0.455
Question: and what was it in the first quarter?
Answer: 0.45
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

1	quarter ended	2002 high	2002 low	2002 dividend	2002 high	2002 low	dividend
2	december 31	$ 25.84	$ 21.50	$ .455	$ 24.80	$ 22.00	$ .45
3	september 30	28.88	21.40	.455	26.17	21.60	.45
4	june 30	28.95	25.46	.450	24.99	22.00	.43
5	march 31	26.50	22.92	.450	25.44	21.85	.43

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the cash dividend per share in the last quarter of 2002? and what was it in the first quarter?
Previous answers: 0.455 0.45
Question: what was, then, the change in that cash dividend throughout 2002?
Answer: 0.005
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

1	quarter ended	2002 high	2002 low	2002 dividend	2002 high	2002 low	dividend
2	december 31	$ 25.84	$ 21.50	$ .455	$ 24.80	$ 22.00	$ .45
3	september 30	28.88	21.40	.455	26.17	21.60	.45
4	june 30	28.95	25.46	.450	24.99	22.00	.43
5	march 31	26.50	22.92	.450	25.44	21.85	.43

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the cash dividend per share in the last quarter of 2002? and what was it in the first quarter? what was, then, the change in that cash dividend throughout 2002?
Previous answers: 0.455 0.45 0.005
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation in relation to that cash dividend in the first quarter?
Answer: 0.01111