aveni-ai/aveni-bench-convfinqa huggingface dataset:
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2015 net revenue	$ 1666
3	nuclear realized price changes	-149 ( 149 )
4	rhode island state energy center	-44 ( 44 )
5	nuclear volume	-36 ( 36 )
6	fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement	41
7	nuclear fuel expenses	68
8	other	-4 ( 4 )
9	2016 net revenue	$ 1542

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue . the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 . see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Question: how much did net revenue change between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 124
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

1	date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
2	december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
3	december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
4	december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
5	december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
6	december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
7	december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what is the net change in the price for pmi common stock from 2013 to 2018?
Answer: -3.5
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

1	date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
2	december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
3	december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
4	december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
5	december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
6	december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
7	december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the net change in the price for pmi common stock from 2013 to 2018?
Previous answers: -3.5
Question: what is that change over 100?
Answer: -0.035
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1	12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017
2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52
3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67
4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

.

Question: what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 111.67
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1	12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017
2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52
3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67
4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017?
Previous answers: 111.67
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage?
Answer: 1.1167
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1	12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017
2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52
3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67
4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017? and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage?
Previous answers: 111.67 1.1167
Question: what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 retail index from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 186.13
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1	12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017
2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52
3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67
4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017? and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage? what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 retail index from 2012 to 2017?
Previous answers: 111.67 1.1167 186.13
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage?
Answer: 1.8613
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

1	12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017
2	tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52
3	s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67
4	s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017? and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage? what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 retail index from 2012 to 2017? and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage?
Previous answers: 111.67 1.1167 186.13 1.8613
Question: what is, then, the difference between the s&p 500 percentage change and the s&p 500 retail index one?
Answer: 0.7446
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
3	volume/weather	18.9
4	other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
5	2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: what was the total increase in the volume/weather segment from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 18900000
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
3	volume/weather	18.9
4	other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
5	2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the total increase in the volume/weather segment from 2009 to 2010?
Previous answers: 18900000.0
Question: and what is the average of this increase per gwh increased in the billed electricity usage?
Answer: 18068.83365
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
3	volume/weather	18.9
4	other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
5	2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the total increase in the volume/weather segment from 2009 to 2010? and what is the average of this increase per gwh increased in the billed electricity usage?
Previous answers: 18900000.0 18068.83365
Question: in that same period, what was the total change in the net revenue?
Answer: 18.6