aveni-ai/aveni-bench-convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
3	volume/weather	18.9
4	other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
5	2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the total increase in the volume/weather segment from 2009 to 2010? and what is the average of this increase per gwh increased in the billed electricity usage? in that same period, what was the total change in the net revenue?
Previous answers: 18900000.0 18068.83365 18.6
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that net revenue in 2009?
Answer: 555.3
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2016 net revenue	$ 1520.5
3	retail electric price	33.8
4	opportunity sales	5.6
5	asset retirement obligation	-14.8 ( 14.8 )
6	volume/weather	-29.0 ( 29.0 )
7	other	6.5
8	2017 net revenue	$ 1522.6

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: what is the sum of net revenues from 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 3043.1
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2016 net revenue	$ 1520.5
3	retail electric price	33.8
4	opportunity sales	5.6
5	asset retirement obligation	-14.8 ( 14.8 )
6	volume/weather	-29.0 ( 29.0 )
7	other	6.5
8	2017 net revenue	$ 1522.6

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the sum of net revenues from 2016 and 2017?
Previous answers: 3043.1
Question: what is that divided by 2?
Answer: 1521.55
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .?
Answer: -21.08
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .?
Previous answers: -21.08
Question: and what is this fluctuation as a percent of that return in 2007?
Answer: -0.2108
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .? and what is this fluctuation as a percent of that return in 2007?
Previous answers: -21.08 -0.2108
Question: in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the nasdaq composite?
Answer: 10.78
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .? and what is this fluctuation as a percent of that return in 2007? in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the nasdaq composite?
Previous answers: -21.08 -0.2108 10.78
Question: and what was this nasdaq composite fluctuation as a percentage of the return of that stock in 2007?
Answer: 0.1078
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .? and what is this fluctuation as a percent of that return in 2007? in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the nasdaq composite? and what was this nasdaq composite fluctuation as a percentage of the return of that stock in 2007?
Previous answers: -21.08 -0.2108 10.78 0.1078
Question: what was, then, the difference between the cadence design systems inc . percentage and this nasdaq composite one?
Answer: -31.86
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

1	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
2	united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
3	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
4	dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?
Answer: 148.92
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

1	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
2	united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
3	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
4	dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?
Previous answers: 148.92
Question: and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?
Answer: 48.92
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

1	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
2	united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
3	s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
4	dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006? and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?
Previous answers: 148.92 48.92
Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006?
Answer: 135.02