aveni-ai/aveni-bench-convfinqa huggingface dataset:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

1	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
2	loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
3	s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
4	loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Previous questions in this conversation: from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock? and what was this change as a portion of the 2010 value of that stock?
Previous answers: -2.63 -0.0263
Question: and from 2010 to 2012, what was the change in the value of that stock?
Answer: 6.04
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

1	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
2	loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
3	s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
4	loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Previous questions in this conversation: from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock? and what was this change as a portion of the 2010 value of that stock? and from 2010 to 2012, what was the change in the value of that stock?
Previous answers: -2.63 -0.0263 6.04
Question: how much did this change represent in relation to that 2010 value?
Answer: 0.0604
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

.

Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2005 less an assumed initial $100 investment?
Answer: 11.15
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

1	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
3	s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
4	nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
5	s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2005 less an assumed initial $100 investment?
Previous answers: 11.15
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 0.1115
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

1	12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14
2	e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81
3	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14
4	dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

table of contents .

Question: what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014?
Answer: 137.81
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

1	12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14
2	e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81
3	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14
4	dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

table of contents .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014?
Previous answers: 137.81
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer: 37.81
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

1	12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14
2	e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81
3	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14
4	dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

table of contents .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014? what is that less 100?
Previous answers: 137.81 37.81
Question: what is the change over 100?
Answer: 0.3781
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Question: what is the value of net earnings for basic and diluted eps in 2017?
Answer: 6021
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of net earnings for basic and diluted eps in 2017?
Previous answers: 6021.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
Answer: 6948
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of net earnings for basic and diluted eps in 2017? what was the value in 2016?
Previous answers: 6021.0 6948.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -927
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of net earnings for basic and diluted eps in 2017? what was the value in 2016? what is the net change?
Previous answers: 6021.0 6948.0 -927.0
Question: what was the 2016 value?
Answer: 6948
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of net earnings for basic and diluted eps in 2017? what was the value in 2016? what is the net change? what was the 2016 value?
Previous answers: 6021.0 6948.0 -927.0 6948.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2016 value?
Answer: -0.13342
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
3	volume/weather	15.5
4	net gas revenue	6.6
5	rider revenue	3.9
6	base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
7	other	7.0
8	2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Question: what is the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 21.7
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

1	amount ( in millions )
2	2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
3	volume/weather	15.5
4	net gas revenue	6.6
5	rider revenue	3.9
6	base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
7	other	7.0
8	2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Previous answers: 21.7
Question: what is that divided by the 2007 net revenues?
Answer: 0.09394