aveni-ai/aveni-bench-convfinqa huggingface dataset:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

1	( in millions )	2007	2006	2005
2	sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs	$ -4887 ( 4887 )	$ -5312 ( 5312 )	$ -3754 ( 3754 )
3	net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production	12845	-1342 ( 1342 )	6648
4	extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1816	1290	700
5	development costs incurred during the period	1654	1251	1030
6	changes in estimated future development costs	-1727 ( 1727 )	-527 ( 527 )	-552 ( 552 )
7	revisions of previous quantity estimates	290	1319	820
8	net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	23	30	4557
9	accretion of discount	1726	1882	1124
10	net change in income taxes	-6751 ( 6751 )	-660 ( 660 )	-6694 ( 6694 )
11	timing and other	-12 ( 12 )	-14 ( 14 )	307
12	net change for the year	4977	-2083 ( 2083 )	4186
13	beginning of year	8518	10601	6415
14	end of year	$ 13495	$ 8518	$ 10601
15	net change for the year from discontinued operations	$ 2013	$ -216 ( 216 )	$ 162

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007? what were development costs in 2007?
Previous answers: 403.0 1654.0
Question: what is the net change added to the 2007 costs?
Answer: 2057
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
Answer: 78.92
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
Previous answers: 78.92
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: -21.08
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012? what is the net change in value?
Previous answers: 78.92 -21.08
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: -0.2108
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012? what is the net change in value? what rate of return does this represent?
Previous answers: 78.92 -21.08 -0.2108
Question: what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?
Answer: 10.78
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012? what is the net change in value? what rate of return does this represent? what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?
Previous answers: 78.92 -21.08 -0.2108 10.78
Question: what is the rate of return for nasdaq composite?
Answer: 0.1078
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

1	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
2	cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
3	nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
4	s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Previous questions in this conversation: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012? what is the net change in value? what rate of return does this represent? what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012? what is the rate of return for nasdaq composite?
Previous answers: 78.92 -21.08 -0.2108 10.78 0.1078
Question: what is the difference in rate of return among these investments?
Answer: -31.86
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

1	december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
2	jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
3	kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
4	s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
5	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

.

Question: what was the change in the return of the kbw bank index from 2009 to 2014?
Answer: 89.69
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

1	december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
2	jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
3	kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
4	s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
5	s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

.

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the change in the return of the kbw bank index from 2009 to 2014?
Previous answers: 89.69
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that return in 2009?
Answer: 0.8969
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
3	interest cost	90	61	72
4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
6	amortization of loss	78	92	77
7	settlements	2	2014	7
8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Question: what was the net pension cost in 2018?
Answer: 137
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
3	interest cost	90	61	72
4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
6	amortization of loss	78	92	77
7	settlements	2	2014	7
8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the net pension cost in 2018?
Previous answers: 137.0
Question: and in 2017?
Answer: 138
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
3	interest cost	90	61	72
4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
6	amortization of loss	78	92	77
7	settlements	2	2014	7
8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the net pension cost in 2018? and in 2017?
Previous answers: 137.0 138.0
Question: combined, what was the total for these two years?
Answer: 275
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

1	( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
2	service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
3	interest cost	90	61	72
4	expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
5	amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
6	amortization of loss	78	92	77
7	settlements	2	2014	7
8	net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
9	net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Previous questions in this conversation: what was the net pension cost in 2018? and in 2017? combined, what was the total for these two years?
Previous answers: 137.0 138.0 275.0
Question: and in 2016?
Answer: 113