av9ash/GitBugs huggingface dataset:
Bug: Options|Delivery Format|Auto-Detect fails
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-04 11:49:40+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-07 05:47:41+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0

Steps to reproduce:

1- By default I write emails in plain text.

2- If I want to send and HTML mail I open a new mail with SHIFT + WRITE.



Actual results:

3- When I send that mail it is still sent as plain text.
'Options' / 'Delivery format' is set to 'Auto-Detect'.

4- When I explicitly change the delivery format to 'Rich Text (HTML) only', the mail is sent correctly as HTML.


Expected results:

Conclusion: It appears that Auto-Detect doesn't detect the state of the current mail.

Observation: It is certainly odd that after having specifically set the message format to HTML the user has to set the delivery format in a second step.

It is a very annoying bug because all the formatting work and images I put into the HTML file are thrown away. The Sent message is plain text.
Bug: [meta] Bugs found during testing and initial release of TB102
Status: NEW
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-04 15:49:38+00:00
Resolved: 2024-05-31 11:20:01+00:00

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1722793 +++

# README 

We use this meta to track bugs found ***late in beta 102 and early in 102's life. ***[1]  

* **Discussion and bug reporting is not permitted in ***this*** bug report**.  Please file your own bug reports.

* We use this during beta of Thunderbird 102, and also bugs found in the weeks after 102 is released period, until roughly 102.2 , so that people can easily track their discovery 

* You can see the previously reported bugs in the [dependency list](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1772703&hide_resolved=1) or [this table view](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/report.cgi?x_axis_field=resolution&y_axis_field=component&z_axis_field=&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Client+Software&classification=Components&product=MailNews+Core&product=Thunderbird&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_id=&bug_id_type=anyexact&votes=&votes_type=greaterthaneq&bug_type=defect&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&emailtype3=substring&email3=&chfieldvalue=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=&j_top=AND&f1=short_desc&o1=nowordssubstr&v1=&f2=component&o2=nowordssubstr&v2=&f3=OP&j3=AND&f4=blocked&o4=equals&v4=1772703&f5=longdesc&o5=anywordssubstr&v5=&f6=CP&f7=OP&j7=OR&f8=short_desc&o8=anywordssubstr&v8=&f9=component&o9=noop&v9=&f10=CP&format=table&action=wrap)

* You can set bugs found during this time to block this bug.   But we do not track support requests, enhancement requests, nor bugs that involved add-on API which is only relevant to add-on developers, nor older bug reports ***[1]. 

* [query for new v102 bugs which are not yet blocking this meta bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?o1=notequals&f11=CP&f3=OP&f10=cf_tracking_thunderbird_esr91&v1=1772703&classification=Client%20Software&classification=Developer%20Infrastructure&classification=Components&classification=Server%20Software&classification=Other&o7=equals&f9=version&v7=affected&query_format=advanced&j5=OR&bug_id=1772703&n4=1&o6=substring&chfieldto=2022-11-01&chfieldfrom=2022-05-01&v6=102&f5=OP&v2=build%20add-on&f4=blocked&chfield=%5BBug%20creation%5D&o2=nowordssubstr&o10=notsubstring&f8=CP&v10=affected&f1=bug_id&o9=nowordssubstr&v9=91%2078&f7=cf_status_thunderbird_esr102&f6=version&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&product=MailNews%20Core&product=Thunderbird&v4=1772703&list_id=17057680&bug_type=defect&f2=component&bug_id_type=nowords&o4=substring)

***[1] A note about bugs older than this meta bug - This meta bug is NOT intended to capture old existing bugs reported between 91 and 101, nor to gain extra attention to major unresolved issues, nor as a draft for release notes.  If such bugs need extra attention, please give them some analysis and update them with your steps to reproduce to help move them forward to resolution.
Bug: reply to self doesn't account for "Reply from this identity"
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-04 16:35:58+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-06 06:07:20+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/100.0

Steps to reproduce:

I have 3 accounts configured in my ThB.
For the one with the issue, the option "Reply with this identity when distribution headers match with" is activated with the value "*@ac-grenoble.fr".

I go to the "sent folder". (1)
I select one email.
I clic "reply". (2)
The compose window shows up.
What I expect : in the "from" field, I should the my email adress. 
What I get : in the "from" field, I get the adress which is in the "send to" field. (3)
I also get a warning message at the bottom of the page stating that "No unique identity matching with the sender's adress has been found. The message will be sent using the currunt sender adress with identity parameters from "##my account" (4)

I don't get the issue when I deactivate the option ""Reply with this identity when ..." in the account's settings.


NB : sorry if the fields' names & messages aren't the exact ones, my thunderb is in french.


Actual results:

What I expect : in the "from" field, I should the my email adress. 



Expected results:

What I get : in the "from" field, I get the adress which is in the "send to" field.

(sorry if it is a feature and not a bug :-) - but if so, from my standpoint it's not a good one :-))
Thanks for your help and work.
Bug: Deleat feature label missing.
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: DUPLICATE
Created: 2022-06-04 16:44:56+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-04 19:27:37+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/102.0.5005.63 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce:

In the most recent UPDATE if I right-click on an E-mail the USUAL dropdown appears BUT under Convert to SHOULD be Delete BUT it is BLANK! In actuality, the function IS there but NOT LABELED.
Bug: Tagged is removed when saving draft
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-04 17:45:03+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-07 04:50:07+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/100.0

Steps to reproduce:

Create a draft mail, save it, add a tag to it, open the draft mail again and save it


Actual results:

Tag is gone


Expected results:

tag should remain
Bug: new addressbook : multiple selection of contacts is not vocalized by NVDA and Jaws
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: DUPLICATE
Created: 2022-06-05 06:39:23+00:00
Resolved: 2022-08-24 09:20:59+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0

Steps to reproduce:

1. Open the new address book tab
2. peress tab key to reach the contact list
3. select  a contact ;
4. hold don the control or the shift key to select several contacts
5. NVDA or Jaws do not vocalize the contact line which is selected or not.
The focus is moved to the beginning or at the end of the list.
=> multiple selection  is impossible with the Keyboard

Thank you for fixing this important issue.



Expected results:

multiple selection of contacts in the list of contacts is impossible with the keyboard.
Bug: Edit 'Undo Delete Message' does not work on 91.10 Mac
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: WORKSFORME
Created: 2022-06-05 16:54:44+00:00
Resolved: 2022-09-04 22:43:29+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.5 Safari/605.1.15

Steps to reproduce:

When trying to undo deleted message nothing happens


Actual results:

It will not restore deleted message


Expected results:

It should be moved back into 'In' box
Bug: IPDL protocol error: Handler returned error code!
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-05 18:15:24+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-06 15:42:05+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/102.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce:

Read any mail message in Thunderbird


Actual results:

The following messages appear whenever any mail message is read.  

IPDL protocol error: Handler returned error code!
###!!! [Parent][DispatchAsyncMessage] Error: PClientManager::Msg_ExpectFutureClientSource Processing error: message was deserialized, but the handler returned false (indicating failure)

IPDL protocol error: Handler returned error code!
###!!! [Parent][DispatchAsyncMessage] Error: PClientManager::Msg_ForgetFutureClientSource Processing error: message was deserialized, but the handler returned false (indicating failure)




Expected results:

I don't believe these message should have appeared.  I will add more explanation upon submitting the bug.
Bug: [matrix] permanent 'Decrypting...' message if key for decryption is missing
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: FIXED
Created: 2022-06-05 18:40:17+00:00
Resolved: 2022-07-01 16:20:47+00:00

Thunderbird 102.0a1 20220530 and 103.0a1 120220605 on Windows 8.1

After the credentials for one, different Matrix account got added to each of the two Thunderbird installations above, the tried to decrypt previous chat history and show "Decrypting..." for the 1:1 chat which persists.

There is a string in the application which is supposed to get used in such cases:
message.decryptionError=Could not decrypt the contents of this message. To request encryption keys from your other devices, right click this message.
Bug: Version Fr Thunderbird recorded "91.10.0 (32 bits)" in the "About Thunderbird" menu ?
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: INCOMPLETE
Created: 2022-06-06 06:41:47+00:00
Resolved: 2022-12-04 20:51:44+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/102.0.5005.63 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce:

Version Fr Thunderbird 64 bits install


Actual results:

Version Fr Thunderbird 64 bits recorded "91.10.0 (32 bits)" in the About Thunderbird menu...


Expected results:

In the "About Thunderbird menu" :
- Thunderbird 64 bits recorded "91.10.0 (32 bits)"...
Bug: Version Fr Thunderbird 64 bits recorded "91.10.0 (32 bits)" in the "About Thunderbird" menu ?
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: DUPLICATE
Created: 2022-06-06 06:57:00+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-06 08:33:57+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/102.0.5005.63 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce:

Version Fr Thunderbird 64 bits install


Actual results:

Version Fr Thunderbird 64 bits recorded "91.10.0 (32 bits)" in the About Thunderbird menu...


Expected results:

In the "About Thunderbird menu" :
- Thunderbird 64 bits recorded "91.10.0 (64 bits)"...
Bug: Spinbuttons in Account Manager "Edit Card" Special Dates have no height
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: FIXED
Created: 2022-06-06 09:15:00+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-06 18:23:29+00:00

The Spinbuttons in Account Manager "Edit Card" (editVCardDialog) in the Special Dates year fieldhave no height.
Bug: Move or deletion failure due to I/O error causes a folder to be "locked" and operations are no longer allowed on the folder
Status: NEW
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-06 13:42:39+00:00
Resolved: 2022-09-29 13:26:09+00:00

I am testing locally compiled C-C TB under Debian GNU/linux.
It is a DEBUG build.
(No local patches except for strange GCC-10 compile time bug is applied. )
I am testing the behavior of error recovery in the face of I/O error (mostly write error) by storing my local messages in a folder mounted from a remote file system.
To simulate the  I/O error, I pulled the plug and caused the timeout of File I/O operation to occur.

What I did:
In the Inbox, there were about a hundred plus small messages.
I selected them all to move them to Trash folder.
For that, I hit [delete] button.
As soon as, I hit the delete button (maybe a second or two later), I pulled the plug from the remote CIFS server so that the I/O operation would timeout and error is returned.

- TB responded with an error dialog.s
(This was when  the first screen dump  attachment was created.)
 I restored the plug to remote CIFS server before hitting OK there.

 I hit the OK button, and the dialog disappeared.

 However, something went wrong. If I visited the Input folder, the messages were shown.
But if I tried to show the Trash folder by moving the cursor and click the Trash folder, the mouse cursor became a spinning icon and
nothing proceed. I could not access and show the Trash folder.

- Eventually, I figured that by compacting trash folder, this spinning icon is no longer shown.

Please recall that I tried to delete the messages from Inbox, but it was prematurely terminated or stopped in mid way. (I think the latter seemed to happen because by this time, I realize that somehow the messages from the Inbox were moved to Trash folder. I suspect this move has occurred after the compaction finished so it seemed that this "delete" operation interrupted by an I/O error was remembered by TB and as soon as I/O error no longer occurred and the "lock" condition of Trash folder (pure guess) disappeared, the DELETE operation occurred automatically.

Now, I tried to move the messages in trash folder to Inbox in order to continue test.
This is when TB said "The operation failed because another operation is using the folder. 
Please wait for the operation to finish and then try again."
The folder in question seems to be Inbox. (See the 2nd attachment. The  dialog message says "Error - Inbox on mtest2@locahost".

So this seems to suggest that the Trash folder was in strange state (note the spinning icon), and then after a while, the Inbox was put into a locked state, locked for a pending i/O operation. 

Simulated I/O errors by the unplugging/plugging of remote CIFS server can
cause many types of errors the timing of which was not defined in detail 
and co-related with TB's logic flow very well.
I/O errors during successive tests may cause TB to experience the error at 
different code lines and so very difficult to produce.

At least, I know there is something wrong during the moving of messages to
Trash folder using "delete:".
This has been re-produced at least once.
Bug: Crash in [@ nsMsgDatabase::SetUint32Property]
Status: NEW
Priority: P3
Created: 2022-06-06 14:22:12+00:00
Resolved: 2023-12-31 00:01:20+00:00

What do we make of this?

Crash report: https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/report/index/d8ff99cf-f01c-4bf5-a300-6fc220220605  102.0 beta

Reason: ```EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ```

Top 10 frames of crashing thread:
```
0 xul.dll nsMsgDatabase::SetUint32Property mailnews/db/msgdb/src/nsMsgDatabase.cpp:3274
1 xul.dll nsImapMailFolder::NormalEndHeaderParseStream mailnews/imap/src/nsImapMailFolder.cpp:2889
2 xul.dll nsImapMailFolder::ParseMsgHdrs mailnews/imap/src/nsImapMailFolder.cpp:2676
3 xul.dll `anonymous namespace'::SyncRunnable2<nsIImapMailFolderSink, const char*, nsIImapUrl*>::Run mailnews/imap/src/nsSyncRunnableHelpers.cpp:121
4 xul.dll mozilla::RunnableTask::Run xpcom/threads/TaskController.cpp:475
5 xul.dll mozilla::TaskController::DoExecuteNextTaskOnlyMainThreadInternal xpcom/threads/TaskController.cpp:788
6 xul.dll mozilla::TaskController::ExecuteNextTaskOnlyMainThreadInternal xpcom/threads/TaskController.cpp:620
7 xul.dll mozilla::TaskController::ProcessPendingMTTask xpcom/threads/TaskController.cpp:398
8 xul.dll mozilla::detail::RunnableFunction<`lambda at /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/xpcom/threads/TaskController.cpp:124:7'>::Run xpcom/threads/nsThreadUtils.h:531
9 xul.dll nsThread::ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:1180
```
bp-a52837bc-5d91-479d-aaab-8fe0f0220604 91.10.0
Bug: Thunderbird Dark theme incorrectly selected as background
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: INVALID
Created: 2022-06-06 17:01:47+00:00
Resolved: 2022-07-05 14:51:46+00:00

I compared the background colors for themes between Thunderbird 91.10.0 (64-bit) and 102.0b2 (64-bit) under Windows 11 Pro. 

1) The light theme in 91.10.0 is white. It is light grey in 102.0b2, though if I enable a add-on theme (and it doesn't incorrectly turn the background dark) the background is the same white as in 91.10.0. 

2) In the following table if a add-on theme in 102.0b2 has a black background I also tried selecting the built-in light theme before selecting the add-on theme again. In every case that made no difference.

Theme                                  91.10.0                 102.0b2
---------------------------------------------------------
color palette                        White                  Black
abstract114                           White                  Black
autumn path                        White                  Black
dark green geometry           White                  Black
dream of waves                    White                  White
glass blood                           White                  Black
horizontal wood                   White                  White
sea shells on beach             White                  Black
soft aqua                              White                  White
soft drawing paper              White                  White
woody persona                    White                  White

I'm using the same profile for both versions. My system is not using a Windows theme, its just using a background picture. 

I have compact headers, folderflags, headertools improved and manually sort folders enabled. ImportExportTools NG is installed but disabled. I tried disabling all of them, exiting and restarting while using a theme (color palette) that incorrectly has a black background with 102.0b2. It made no difference.

All of the add-on themes I tested using 91.10.0 and in 102.0b2 should have a white background. 6 out of 11 didn't with 102.0b2. That seems too many to blame the add-on authors.

The light theme is light grey when used by itself in 102.b2. The light theme should have the same color as 91.10.0 (white). 
.
Bug: Email only syncing for 4 months after update to release 91.10.0
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: INCOMPLETE
Created: 2022-06-06 19:04:47+00:00
Resolved: 2022-12-04 20:52:03+00:00

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0

Steps to reproduce:

Thunderbird auto installed Release version 91.10.0 


Actual results:

email only shows back to 11/25/21 in sent and 2/1/22 in inbox.  On the web at mail.aol.com I have email back to 2017 in both boxes


Expected results:

No change in presentation of email after auto update of release.
Bug: Default icon color incorrectly displayed as black on color picker button in folder properties
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: P3
Resolution: FIXED
Created: 2022-06-06 19:24:52+00:00
Resolved: 2023-01-03 22:58:10+00:00

Default folder icon colors are not displayed in the preferences window.

STR:
0. Thunderbird 102.0b2, clean profile
1. Switch from the new account tab to the main tab
2. Create a new feed account with default settings to make the folder panel visible
3. Right-click on the feed account and add a new folder with any name
4. Right-click on the new folder and select the last item from the context menu (likely: "Preferences", but I'm not on an en-US locale while reporting this)

Expected:
The preferences window displays the same orange symbol color the folder is displayed at in the folder panel.

Actual:
The preferences window displays a dark blue symbol color (changing the color reveals that it is a custom color; changing the color to any other setting does work as expected).
Bug: Intermittent comm/mail/test/browser/message-header/browser_messageHeader.js | Uncaught exception in test - Currently visible lines are more/fewer than the number of max lines - timed out after 50 tries.
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: P5
Resolution: WORKSFORME
Created: 2022-06-06 23:58:27+00:00
Resolved: 2024-08-30 00:06:51+00:00

**Filed by:** geoff [at] darktrojan.net
**Parsed log:** https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=380400883&repo=comm-central
**Full log:** https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/Kzr0GDE5TCiCfZG4qELmQQ/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log

---
```

```
Bug: Thunderbird icon color button doesn't show default color
Status: RESOLVED
Priority: --
Resolution: DUPLICATE
Created: 2022-06-07 02:34:18+00:00
Resolved: 2022-06-08 16:57:06+00:00

I'm using Thunderbird 102.0b2 under Windows 11Pro. 

If you right click on a folder in the folder pane, select properties and then look at the "Icon Color" button in the general information tab it should display the current color (before you press it). 

It does that if you changed the color. For example changing the default pink for a saved search folder to teal.  However if you use the default color (or reset the color) it always shows a almost black  color in the properties. For example the junk folder icon defaults to red. Yet the associated Icon Color button is almost black.

This minor cosmetic problem doesn't occur with 91.10.0.
Bug: View > Custom > people I know view broken, not listing any messages (in old profiles)
Status: NEW
Priority: --
Created: 2022-06-07 08:51:20+00:00
Resolved: 2025-01-08 08:53:09+00:00

I'm running TB 102.0b3 under Windows 11Pro. It has a FolderFlags and CompactHeaders add-on, which I've disabled. I had customized the main toolbar to add the View widget. I selected custom views -> "people I know" while viewing the inbox of my main account (Fastmail IMAP). The folder listing is empty. Its been a while since I used that but it used to work fine.

I tried the four other predefined custom views and they work fine. I used customize and edit to examine what "People I know" actually contains. It has "Match all of the following" with "From" "is in my address book" "Personal Address Book". That should display hundreds of messages.

I checked the sender for many of the messages is in my personal address book. I even viewed some messages, clicked on the edit contact icon after the From: email address in the headers and verified that the contact was in my personal address book.

I switched to safe mode using help -> troubleshooting mode. I had to customize the toolbar again to add the View widget. Same problem. However, the same search filter via Edit -> find -> search messages works in safe mode. 

If I restart into normal mode I see that  "From" only has "contains" and "doesn't contain" options. It doesn't have  "is in my address book". That is is only present in safe mode. 

While in safe mode I created a saved search folder that duplicates "people I know". However, it also works when run in normal mode. 

* View -> custom views -> "people I know"  fails all the time
* The equivalent using Edit -> find -> search messages works only in safe mode (because that restores the missing "is in my address book" filter)
* A saved search folder equivalent of "people I know" works all the time. The only issue with it is you can't create it except in safe mode.

My copy of Thunderbird 102.0b3 shares a profile with Thunderbird 91.10.0 whose shortcut adds --allow-downgrade . I also have a copy of daily 103.0a1 (2022-06-06) (64-bit) which has its own profile.

I have the exact same symptoms with both 91.10.0 and Daily.

I did a little more testing and found that if I unchecked "run search on server" Edit -> find -> search messages has all of the filters for From: . i.e. it now has "is in my address book". 

I switched from Fastmail to Gmail , Outlook , Yahoo , Comcast and Mailfence and found that while custom views -> "people I know" breaks for their inbox, "run search on folder" doesn't hide "is in my address book".

So it looks like something broke recently in the View widget for custom views -> "people I know" and there is some limitation in what searches the Fastmail Cyrus IMAP server will do unless you are in safe mode.