text1: Despite all the hoopla over a pro-choice advocate's confession that he had lied about the circumstances under which the procedure is generally used, only five lawmakers switched their votes from no to yes.
feat_premise_binary_parse: ( ( Despite ( ( ( all ( the hoopla ) ) ( over ( ( a ( pro-choice ( advocate 's ) ) ) confession ) ) ) ( that ( he ( had ( lied ( about ( ( the circumstances ) ( ( under which ) ( ( the procedure ) ( ( is generally ) used ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( only ( five lawmakers ) ) ( ( ( ( switched ( their votes ) ) ( from no ) ) ( to yes ) ) . ) ) ) )
feat_premise_parse: (ROOT (S (PP (IN Despite) (NP (NP (PDT all) (DT the) (NN hoopla)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ pro-choice) (NN advocate) (POS 's)) (NN confession))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN lied) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS circumstances)) (SBAR (WHPP (IN under) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (DT the) (NN procedure)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB generally)) (VP (VBN used))))))))))))) (, ,) (NP (RB only) (CD five) (NNS lawmakers)) (VP (VBD switched) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS votes)) (PP (IN from) (NP (RB no))) (PP (TO to) (NP (RB yes)))) (. .)))
text2: 100 lawmakers switched their votes from no to yes upon learning that the advocate had lied about the circumstances of the procedure.
feat_hypothesis_binary_parse: ( ( 100 lawmakers ) ( ( ( ( ( switched ( their votes ) ) ( from no ) ) ( to yes ) ) ( upon ( learning ( that ( ( the advocate ) ( had ( lied ( about ( ( the circumstances ) ( of ( the procedure ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
feat_hypothesis_parse: (ROOT (S (NP (CD 100) (NNS lawmakers)) (VP (VBD switched) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS votes)) (PP (IN from) (NP (RB no))) (PP (TO to) (NP (RB yes))) (PP (IN upon) (S (VP (VBG learning) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN advocate)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN lied) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS circumstances)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN procedure))))))))))))) (. .)))