text1: In addition to the arguments previously advanced by the Vice Presidentas representatives and addressed in our June 22 letter to the Counsel to the Vice President (see Enclosure 1), the Vice Presidentas August 2 letter to the Congress asserts that the study is not authorized by statute because GAO is limited to looking at the aresults- of programs and that GAO does not have a right of access to documents because the Vice President is not included under the term aagency- used in GAOas statute.
feat_premise_binary_parse: ( ( In ( ( ( addition ( to ( the arguments ) ) ) ( ( ( previously ( advanced ( by ( the ( Vice ( Presidentas representatives ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( addressed ( in ( ( our ( June ( 22 letter ) ) ) ( to ( the Counsel ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( the ( Vice President ) ) ) ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( see ( Enclosure 1 ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the ( Vice ( Presidentas ( August ( 2 letter ) ) ) ) ) ( ( to ( the Congress ) ) ( ( asserts ( ( ( that ( ( the study ) ( ( is not ) ( ( ( ( authorized ( by statute ) ) ( because ( GAO ( is ( limited ( to ( looking ( at ( the aresults ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) - ) ( of programs ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( that ( GAO ( ( does not ) ( ( have ( ( a right ) ( of ( access ( to documents ) ) ) ) ) ( because ( ( the ( Vice President ) ) ( ( is not ) ( included ( under ( ( ( the ( term aagency ) ) - ) ( used ( in ( GAOas statute ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
feat_premise_parse: (ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (NP (NN addition)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNS arguments))) (UCP (ADJP (RB previously) (JJ advanced) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NNP Vice) (NNP Presidentas) (NNS representatives)))) (CC and) (VP (VBN addressed) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (PRP$ our) (NNP June) (CD 22) (NN letter)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Counsel))))) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Vice) (NNP President)))))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (VP (VB see) (NP (NNP Enclosure) (CD 1)))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Vice) (NNP Presidentas) (NNP August) (CD 2) (NN letter)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Congress))) (VP (VBZ asserts) (SBAR (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN study)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBN authorized) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN statute))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (VBN limited) (PP (TO to) (S (VP (VBG looking) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NNS aresults)))))))))) (: -) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS programs))))))) (CC and) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB not) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN right)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN access)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNS documents)))))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP Vice) (NNP President)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBN included) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN term) (NN aagency)) (: -) (VP (VBN used) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP GAOas) (NN statute)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
text2: Congress received no letter from the Vice President on the topic of GAO's study.
feat_hypothesis_binary_parse: ( Congress ( ( ( ( received ( no letter ) ) ( from ( the ( Vice President ) ) ) ) ( on ( ( the topic ) ( of ( ( GAO 's ) study ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
feat_hypothesis_parse: (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Congress)) (VP (VBD received) (NP (DT no) (NN letter)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Vice) (NNP President))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN topic)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP GAO) (POS 's)) (NN study)))))) (. .)))