text1: In the case of speech, Fiss appears to believe that the reason the American public is less enlightened than he would wish it to be concerning matters such as feminism, the rights of homosexuals, and regulation of industry is that people are denied access to the opinions and information that would enlighten them.
feat_premise_binary_parse: ( ( In ( ( the case ) ( of speech ) ) ) ( , ( Fiss ( ( appears ( to ( believe ( that ( ( ( the reason ) ( ( the ( American public ) ) ( is ( ( less enlightened ) ( than ( he ( would ( wish ( it ( to ( be ( concerning ( ( ( ( ( ( matters ( such ( as feminism ) ) ) , ) ( ( the rights ) ( of homosexuals ) ) ) , ) and ) ( regulation ( of industry ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( is ( that ( people ( are ( ( denied access ) ( to ( ( the ( ( opinions and ) information ) ) ( that ( would ( enlighten them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
feat_premise_parse: (ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN case)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN speech))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Fiss)) (VP (VBZ appears) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB believe) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN reason)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (JJ American) (NN public)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (ADJP (RBR less) (VBN enlightened)) (SBAR (IN than) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB wish) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBG concerning) (NP (NP (NP (NNS matters)) (PP (JJ such) (IN as) (NP (NN feminism)))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS rights)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS homosexuals)))) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NN regulation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN industry)))))))))))))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN denied) (NP (NN access)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS opinions) (CC and) (NN information)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (MD would) (VP (VB enlighten) (NP (PRP them))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
text2: If people would properly research matters that they don't understand, they would be better equipped to form opinions.
feat_hypothesis_binary_parse: ( ( If ( people ( ( would properly ) ( ( research matters ) ( that ( they ( ( do n't ) understand ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( they ( ( would ( be ( better ( equipped ( to ( form opinions ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
feat_hypothesis_parse: (ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (MD would) (ADVP (RB properly)) (VP (VB research) (NP (NNS matters)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB understand))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB better) (VBN equipped) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB form) (NP (NNS opinions)))))))) (. .)))