text1: Ickes apparently made calls to donors from his government office, but there is no evidence so far that anyone else solicited funds in a federal building.
feat_premise_binary_parse: ( ( ( ( ( Ickes ( apparently ( ( ( made calls ) ( to donors ) ) ( from ( his ( government office ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( there ( ( is ( no evidence ) ) ( ( so far ) ( that ( ( anyone else ) ( solicited ( funds ( in ( a ( federal building ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
feat_premise_parse: (ROOT (S (S (NP (NNS Ickes)) (ADVP (RB apparently)) (VP (VBD made) (NP (NNS calls)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNS donors))) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN government) (NN office))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT no) (NN evidence)) (ADVP (ADVP (RB so) (RB far)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN anyone) (RB else)) (VP (VBN solicited) (NP (NP (NNS funds)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (JJ federal) (NN building)))))))))) (. .)))
text2: Ickes may have solicited donors and prostitutes from his government office.
feat_hypothesis_binary_parse: ( Ickes ( ( may ( have ( ( solicited ( ( donors and ) prostitutes ) ) ( from ( his ( government office ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
feat_hypothesis_parse: (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Ickes)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN solicited) (NP (NNS donors) (CC and) (NNS prostitutes)) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN government) (NN office)))))) (. .)))