text1: Gerth's prize-winning articles do not mention a CIA report concluding that U.S. security was not harmed by the 1996 accident review.
feat_premise_binary_parse: ( ( ( Gerth 's ) ( prize-winning articles ) ) ( ( ( do not ) ( mention ( ( a ( CIA report ) ) ( concluding ( that ( ( U.S. security ) ( ( was not ) ( harmed ( by ( the ( 1996 ( accident review ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
feat_premise_parse: (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Gerth) (POS 's)) (JJ prize-winning) (NNS articles)) (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (VP (VB mention) (S (NP (DT a) (NNP CIA) (NN report)) (VP (VBG concluding) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP U.S.) (NN security)) (VP (VBD was) (RB not) (VP (VBN harmed) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (CD 1996) (NN accident) (NN review))))))))))) (. .)))
text2: Gerth left out important information to make his article seem better.
feat_hypothesis_binary_parse: ( Gerth ( ( ( ( left out ) ( important information ) ) ( to ( make ( ( his article ) ( seem better ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
feat_hypothesis_parse: (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Gerth)) (VP (VBD left) (PRT (RP out)) (NP (JJ important) (NN information)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (S (NP (PRP$ his) (NN article)) (VP (VB seem) (ADVP (RBR better)))))))) (. .)))