Abstract:
An open-systems classroom information technology automation solution that allows a teacher to control features and content on multiple student workstations (an in-desk Tablet PC) through a wireless network and server solution, including hardware, software and network subsystems. The custom product components include a compact self contained in-desk or in-table Tablet PC with input/output port extender. The custom software utilities and applications allow a teacher console to control access to various components and commercially available applications on the student workstations (an in-desk Tablet PC). Other custom software utilities allow the administrator to easily configure student workstations (an in-desk Tablet PC) making add/change/deletes quick and simple.

Description:
SPECIFICATIONS 
       [0001]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 Name 
                 Rodney Standage 
               
               
                 Citizenship 
                 USA 
               
               
                 Address 
                 2800 E Bridgeport Court 
               
               
                   
                 Gilbert, AZ 85295 
               
               
                 Title of the 
                 In-Desk Tablet PC and Classroom Automation System 
               
               
                 Invention 
               
               
                 Cross Reference 
               
               
                 to Related 
               
               
                 Applications 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
       [0002]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 7,667,962 
                 February 2010 
                 Mullen 
               
               
                 7,656,393 
                 February 2010 
                 King, et al. 
               
               
                 7,639,484 
                 December 2009 
                 Chen, et al. 
               
               
                 7,639,237 
                 December 2009 
                 Perkins 
               
               
                 7,630,193 
                 December 2009 
                 Ledbetter, et al. 
               
               
                 7,614,008 
                 November 2009 
                 Ording 
               
               
                 7,599,561 
                 October 2009 
                 Wilson, et al. 
               
               
                 7,557,816 
                 July 2009 
                 Kuroki 
               
               
                 7,545,627 
                 June 2009 
                 Lantigua 
               
               
                 7,519,389 
                 April 2009 
                 Mizumake, et al. 
               
               
                 7,511,703 
                 March 2009 
                 Wilson, et al. 
               
               
                 7,543,244 
                 June 2009 
                 Matthews, et al. 
               
               
                 7,506,592 
                 March 2009 
                 Rossini 
               
               
                 7,502,222 
                 March 2009 
                 Cheng, et al. 
               
               
                 7,502,220 
                 March 2009 
                 Shudo, et al. 
               
               
                 7,493,018 
                 January 2009 
                 Oliver 
               
               
                 7,480,139 
                 January 2009 
                 Ryder, et al. 
               
               
                 7,477,508 
                 January 2009 
                 Pilkington, et al. 
               
               
                 7,454,228 
                 November 2008 
                 Mizumaki, et al. 
               
               
                 7,451,942 
                 November 2008 
                 Peng 
               
               
                 7,398,408 
                 July 2008 
                 Paljug 
               
               
                 7,352,565 
                 April 2008 
                 Yin 
               
               
                 7,281,698 
                 October 2007 
                 Patterson, Jr 
               
               
                 7,215,538 
                 May 2007 
                 Chen, et al. 
               
               
                 7,206,198 
                 April 2007 
                 Wang 
               
               
                 7,203,058 
                 April 2007 
                 Hong 
               
               
                 7,198,327 
                 April 2007 
                 Bergin 
               
               
                 7,173,814 
                 February 2007 
                 Cohen, et al. 
               
               
                 7,173,603 
                 February 2007 
                 Kawasome 
               
               
                 7,168,813 
                 January 2007 
                 Wong, et al. 
               
               
                 RE39429 
                 December 2006 
                 Hawkins, et al. 
               
               
                 7,130,186 
                 October 2006 
                 Yu 
               
               
                 7,091,961 
                 August 2006 
                 Ditzik 
               
               
                 7,061,753 
                 June 2006 
                 Michoux, et al. 
               
               
                 7,054,965 
                 May 2006 
                 Bell, et al. 
               
               
                 7,054,963 
                 May 2006 
                 Betts-LaCroix, et al. 
               
               
                 7,042,400 
                 May 2006 
                 Pryor, et al. 
               
               
                 7,017,988 
                 March 2006 
                 Tornero, et al. 
               
               
                 7,009,594 
                 March 2006 
                 Wang, et al. 
               
               
                 6,985,356 
                 January 2006 
                 Wang 
               
               
                 6,971,624 
                 December 2005 
                 Kollar, et al. 
               
               
                 6,963,487 
                 November 2005 
                 Billington, et al. 
               
               
                 6,962,311 
                 November 2005 
                 Sykes 
               
               
                 6,956,614 
                 October 2005 
                 Quintana, et al. 
               
               
                 6,914,197 
                 July 2005 
                 Doherty, et al. 
               
               
                 6,874,429 
                 April 2005 
                 Bosman, et al. 
               
               
                 6,856,506 
                 February 2005 
                 Doherty, et al. 
               
               
                 6,817,587 
                 November 2004 
                 Lin 
               
               
                 6,609,465 
                 August 2003 
                 Kolavo 
               
               
                 6,486,868 
                 November 2002 
                 Kazarian 
               
               
                 6,474,760 
                 November 2002 
                 Rauls 
               
               
                 6,366,935 
                 April 2002 
                 Hawkins, et al. 
               
               
                 6,301,101 
                 October 2001 
                 Anzai, et al. 
               
               
                 6,256,193 
                 July 2001 
                 Janik, et al. 
               
               
                 6,247,815 
                 June 2001 
                 Inova 
               
               
                 6,237,507 
                 May 2001 
                 Yanagisawa, et al. 
               
               
                 6,129,681 
                 April 2001 
                 Hawkins, et al. 
               
               
                 6,064,373 
                 May 2000 
                 Ditzik 
               
               
                 6,021,535 
                 February 2000 
                 Baus, et al. 
               
               
                 5,915,661 
                 June 1999 
                 Silverman, et al. 
               
               
                 5,899,421 
                 May 1999 
                 Silverman 
               
               
                 5,492,068 
                 February 1996 
                 McKee 
               
               
                 20080192424 
                 August 2008 
                 Lee; Chung-yi 
               
               
                 20070211036 
                 September 2007 
                 Perkins; Michael T. 
               
               
                 20070090638 
                 April 2007 
                 Severi Rivera; Renato Severino 
               
               
                 20060082518 
                 April 2006 
                 Pam; Pranil 
               
               
                 20060037987 
                 February 2006 
                 Lin; Jui-Ching 
               
               
                 20050178298 
                 August 2005 
                 Possini, Alfred P. 
               
               
                 20050045072 
                 March 2005 
                 Rossini, Alfred P. 
               
               
                 20040160738 
                 August 2004 
                 Chen, Ching-Jou; et al. 
               
               
                 20040017652 
                 January 2004 
                 Billington, Corey A.; et al. 
               
               
                 20030235029 
                 December 2003 
                 Doherty, John; et al. 
               
               
                 61/913,332 
                 July 2005 
                 Berterfield, et al. 
               
               
                 6,760,748 
                 July 2004 
                 Hakim 
               
               
                 6,683,394 
                 January 2004 
                 Gevaert 
               
               
                 20030062777 
                 April 2003 
                 Oppitz, Mauricio Bohrer 
               
               
                 20030028588 
                 February 2003 
                 McConnell, Evan; et al. 
               
               
                 7,147,284 
                 December 2006 
                 Mills, et al. 
               
               
                 7,198,327 
                 April 2007 
                 Bergin 
               
               
                 6,286,440 
                 September 2001 
                 Jyringi 
               
               
                 5,452,950 
                 September 1995 
                 Crenshaw, et al. 
               
               
                 5,628,255 
                 May 1997 
                 Neuner 
               
               
                 5,957,059 
                 September 1999 
                 Burhman 
               
               
                 5,961,192 
                 October 1999 
                 Bernart, et al. 
               
               
                 20060293048 
                 December 2006 
                 Swanson; Mark R.; et al. 
               
               
                 20050244803 
                 November 2005 
                 Brown, Benny R; et al. 
               
               
                 20050088816 
                 April 2005 
                 Zodnik, Richard; et al. 
               
               
                 20020097567 
                 July 2002 
                 Zodnik, Richard; et al. 
               
               
                 20030062777 
                 April 2003 
                 Oppitz, Mauricio Bohrer 
               
               
                 4,735,467 
                 April 1988 
                 Wolters 
               
               
                 5,452,950 
                 September 1995 
                 Crenshaw, et al. 
               
               
                 5,896,817 
                 April 1999 
                 Hancock 
               
               
                 5,957,059 
                 September 1999 
                 Burhman 
               
               
                 6,022,087 
                 February 2000 
                 Gilbert 
               
               
                 6,059,385 
                 May 2000 
                 Guhl 
               
               
                 6,092,883 
                 July 2000 
                 Lechman 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT 
       [0003]    Not Applicable. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0004]    The education industry is setting right at the crossroads of major innovation. Teachers and administrators are asking for affordable technology. The marketplace has tremendous potential for educational solutions. The problem is there isn&#39;t an affordable platform on which to deliver the content. 
         [0005]    Today there are primarily three options for computer automation on the student desktop.
       1) They include the standard desktop PC with a vertical monitor   2) The Laptop PC which includes various Tablet PC models and   3) Handheld input response units.       
 
         [0009]    In the classroom, the standard desktop PC is affordably priced, but it is large and consumes excessive power. The monitor creates a barrier between the student and the teacher and lacks multiple input methods desirable for a full featured educational platform. 
         [0010]    The laptop and Tablet PC have many desirable features that enhance the educational experience. However, it is relatively expensive, especially considering how easily mobile devices are broken or lost. 
         [0011]    The handheld input response units are affordable. They are typically a single application, unidirectional peripheral device with highly restricted capabilities. They lack a flexibility of being used with multiple applications and can soon be rendered useless with the next new application. 
         [0012]    There are many technology companies that need a platform to run their solutions. Today this platform tends to be a single user response unit that allows students to respond to questions, but is usually a single application peripheral. Other platforms are Desktop PCs found in the computer lab. These applications tend to focus on learning to use the PC, not using the PC to teach subjects. The learning activity might take place in the computer lab, not the classroom. 
         [0013]    These platforms are not multi-input devices and are not flexible enough to provide all of the learning modalities necessary for today&#39;s classroom. They don&#39;t necessarily eliminate the need of printed learning material or an expense lowering paper-free or textbook free educational experience. 
         [0014]    The product concept is an in-desk multi-media tablet PC pen/touch system that is tied back to a server via an in classroom secure-wireless system. It allows teachers to push curriculum to the desks of each student. It would allow a teacher to test for understanding through out a presentation and provide immediate feedback for individual mentoring. 
         [0015]    The complete system includes a central server, wireless web-security enabled firewall, multiple in-desk configured tablet PCs and a single mobile tablet PC for the teacher. 
         [0016]    The Tablet PC is based on the Microsoft Corp Tablet PC definition http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2000/nov00/11-13tabletpc.mspx) including dual pen and touch solutions of those provided by companies like Wacom (http://www.wacom-components.com/products/MultiTouch/) or N-Trig (http://www.n-trig.com/Content.aspx?Page=AboutUs). 
       BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0017]    The product concept is an in-desk multi-media tablet PC pen/touch system that is tied back to a server via an in classroom secure-wireless system. It allows teachers to push curriculum to the desks of each student. It would allow a teacher to test for understanding through out a presentation and provide immediate feedback for individual mentoring. 
         [0018]    The complete system includes a central server, wireless web-security enabled firewall, multiple in-desk configured tablet PCs and a single mobile tablet PC for the teacher. 
         [0019]    The Tablet PC is based on the Microsoft Corp Tablet PC definition http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2000/nov00/11-13tabletpc.mspx) including dual pen and touch solutions of those provided by companies like Wacom (http://www.wacom-components.com/products/MultiTouch/) or N-Trig (http://www.n-trig.com/Content.aspx?Page=AboutUs). 
         [0020]    The Tablet PC that is integrated into a student desk can be manufactured at a lower cost than mobile devices. The mobile power system and custom compact peripherals are not needed. The robust frame is not needed because the desk structure provides strength and protection. An integrated device is less likely broken or lost than a mobile device. This lowers the total cost of ownership of the device over its lifetime. 
         [0021]    The Server is an industry standard server running Microsoft small business server software and manufactured by companies like HP and Dell. 
         [0022]    The wireless solution provides secure connections between the teacher&#39;s console and the student Tablet PCs. The solutions are available from companies such as Cisco and Sonicwall. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING 
         [0023]    The drawings show representations of the in-desk Tablet PC and various desktop and classroom configurations. These drawing are representative of various embodiments and are not to be understood as a comprehensive selection of available configurations. 
           [0024]      FIG. 1  is a drawing which shows a cross sectional view of the proposed Tablet PC in a desktop and the placement of the I/O port expander attached at the edge on the under side. 
           [0025]      FIG. 2  is a drawing of the top view of a desktop showing the desk, Tablet PC. 
           [0026]      FIG. 3  is a drawing showing a side view of a front hinge configuration. This represents the possible configuration described in the specification. 
           [0027]      FIG. 4  is a drawing showing a classroom configuration with the teacher&#39;s console the firewall and server product stack and ten student desks. 
           [0028]      FIG. 5  is a drawing showing two rows of a four station table configuration. The Tablet PC is embedded into the tabletop in front of each seat. 
           [0029]      FIG. 6  is a picture representation of a Tablet PC in the desktop. It also shows an I/O port extender in the upper corner. 
           [0030]      FIG. 7  are pictures of several student desks. The desks in these pictures are representative of the type of desks that will be used to install the custom Tablet PC. 
           [0031]      FIG. 8  is a drawing showing a front hinge desktop configuration. 
           [0032]      FIG. 9  is a picture showing another mounted multiple desk configuration. Multiple Tablet PCs would be installed into the desk, one at each seat. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0033]    The education industry is setting right at the crossroads of major innovation. Teachers and administrators are asking for affordable technology. The marketplace has tremendous potential for educational solutions. The problem is there isn&#39;t an affordable platform on which to deliver the content. 
         [0034]    Today there are primarily three options for computer automation on the student desktop. 
         [0035]    1) They include the standard desktop PC with a vertical monitor 
         [0036]    2) The mobile laptop PC which includes various mobile Tablet PC models and 
         [0037]    3) Handheld input response units. 
         [0038]    In the classroom, the standard desktop PC is affordably priced, but it is large and consumes excessive power. The monitor creates a barrier between the student and the teacher and lacks multiple input methods desirable for a full featured educational platform. 
         [0039]    The laptop and Tablet PC has many desirable features that enhance the educational experience. However, it is relatively expensive, especially considering how easily they are broken or lost. 
         [0040]    The handheld input response units are affordable. They are typically a single application, unidirectional peripheral device with highly restricted capabilities. They lack a flexibility of being used with multiple applications and can soon be rendered useless with the next new application. 
         [0041]    There are many technology companies that need a platform that runs their solutions. Today this platform tends to be a single user response unit that allows students to respond to questions, but is usually a single application peripheral. Other platforms are Desktop PCs found in the computer lab. These applications tend to focus on learning to use the PC, not using the PC to teach subjects. The learning activity might take place in the computer lab, not the classroom. 
         [0042]    These platforms are not multi-input devices and are not flexible enough to provide all of the learning modalities necessary for today&#39;s classroom. They don&#39;t necessarily eliminate the need of printed learning material or an expense lowering paper-free or textbook free educational experience. 
         [0043]    The product concept is an in-desk multi-media tablet PC pen/touch system that is tied back to a server via an in classroom secure-wireless system. It allows teachers to push curriculum to the desks of each student. It would allow a teacher to test for understanding through out a presentation and provide immediate feedback for individual mentoring. 
         [0044]    The complete system includes a central server, wireless web-security enabled firewall, multiple in-desk configured tablet PCs and a single mobile tablet PC for the teacher. 
         [0045]    The Tablet PC is based on the Microsoft Corp Tablet PC definition http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2000/nov00/11-13tabletpc.mspx) including dual pen and touch solutions of those provided by companies like Wacom (http://www.wacom-components.com/products/MultiTouch/) or N-Trig (http://www.n-trig.com/Content.aspx?Page=AboutUs). 
         [0046]    Our product innovation will provide a stratified product and service offering that can meet the needs of various budgets and feature requirements. 
         [0047]    The product will provide the custom in-desk PC product, classroom wireless network and server solution. Desk and PC integration services and existing desk retrofit services will be supported and delivered both at the factory and on-site. Customer service, product warranty and support services will be coordinated from regional offices. Primary method of hardware break-fix support will be the use of hot spares and next day product exchange. We will also provide on going research and development for product improvement and new feature implementation. 
         [0048]    A custom non-portable Tablet PC would be installed into a standard student desk. The horizontal in-desk configuration would pose less of a distraction during classroom instruction. The teacher controls the display of each student system, turning the monitor on only when needed. The desktop could be covered with an opaque covering to allow the desk to be used for crafts or other projects while protecting the PC from spills or damage when the system was not in use. A port extender would bring IO ports within easy access to the student and be installed on the under side of the desk. The port extender would allow connection of an optional keyboard, mouse or other peripheral device to the Tablet PC. The in-desk configuration would protect the PC from accidental damage, loss and theft at a much lower cost than a standard portable Tablet PC in a laptop configuration. 
         [0049]    The desktop and chair could be made from recycled plastics. 
         [0050]    There is also the option of hinging the front of the device or the front of the desktop to allow the display to tilt for an easier reading or research configuration. 
         [0051]    The Tablet PC: A pen and touch enabled Tablet PC would allow for a multi-input system that could allow for a broad range of educational experiences. The pen could be tethered to the tabletop. A pen caddie option allows the teacher to account for and store the Tablet PC pens. 
         [0052]    Other features include a theft prevention alarm or notification if the Tablet PC were removed from the wireless network. 
         [0053]    Software: Learning activities can be easily customized by a teacher, provide instant feedback to the teacher while the students are engaged in the activity so the teacher can provide individualized topical instructions to students struggling with concepts. 
         [0054]    The teacher&#39;s console can control the access to each application. It would allow one to enable or disable access to control learning methods at the desktop. 
         [0055]    An easy configuration option will auto configure active PCs in the network. This makes it easy to add, change and delete. 
         [0056]    The application could change the teacher&#39;s focus from grading tests and homework assignments to creating interesting and interactive learning experiences to motivate and inspire learning. 
         [0057]    Secure Remote Access: The system includes SRA connectivity options for students to connect from home to receive and submit assignments from their home PCs. 
         [0058]    Bundled applications include
   Word processor   Spreadsheet   Presentation   Text Aloud   Survey Monkey type testing program   e-Reader   e-Ink art program   others   
 
         [0067]    The system would be completely compatible with various PC and server based educational solutions such as e-Whiteboards, Black Board, Genesis, SIRS, Home Logic, Teacher Logic, and others. This is an open systems platform that will allow schools to leverage existing technology investments. It is also a development platform that many technology solution providers can use to distribute their solutions.