Abstract:
A frequency agile sharing technology (FAST) system for controlling frequent usage in a communications system is disclosed. Specifically, a frequency agile sharing technology system of controlling frequency usage and eliminating interference for use with a Personal Communications Service (PCS) System is described. The frequency control system allows PCS systems to coexist in the same frequency band as Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service (POFS) systems without mutual interference. This system also controls frequency usage within a PCS system to eliminate interference from within the PCS system. This interference elimination system combines theoretical radio frequency interference analysis with measurements of actual frequency usage and allows for efficient and coordinated dynamic frequency allocation planning and management. To control frequency assignment and eliminate interference, the system employs several mechanisms including an intersystem interference analysis, an intrasystem interference analysis, a channel use verification (CUV) procedure, and a measured data analysis (MDA). These mechanisms are performed by a centralized controller, channel utilization controller (CUC), comprised of interference analysis/frequency planning computer programs with supporting data bases and data communication links. The system and method described allows for PCS frequency use around existing microwave users and can be readily adapted for use in any area and most efficiently make use of the available communications spectrum in that area. The system protects existing microwave users from interference while providing high quality PCS to subscribers utilizing small, low power and lightweight handsets in the same frequency band.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Personal Communications Services (&#34;PCS&#34;) are the focus of an exceptional amount of interest, both in the United States and around the world. The global telecommunications network today forms the infrastructure for our information-based society. The need for instantaneous communications capability is critically important in today&#39;s information economy, as the unprecedented growth of cellular telecommunications demonstrates. PCS will permit millions of people worldwide to initiate person-to-person communications, using small and inexpensive low-power telephone handsets. People no longer will be tethered to stations at which telephone calls may be placed and received, but will be able to communicate freely whether at home, at work, or in the public environment. 
     PCS will enhance the nation&#39;s productivity and the quality of our lives. It will be a truly personal service. Although PCS will provide competition to cellular, paging, and other services, it will be unlike cellular--at least 95 percent of the airtime of which is paid for by businesses--in that PCS will make portable communications available to great numbers of people who have been unable to participate in today&#39;s mobile telecommunications revolution. It will enable Eastern Europe and Third World countries to leapfrog over their crippled infrastructure handicaps. It will contribute formidably to American exports and economic well-being. In the long term PCS may eventually provide competition to the telephone companies&#39; local exchange monopolies. 
     PCS systems are comprised of multiple base stations that may be linked in a variety of ways to comprise an integrated telecommunications system. Base stations receive communications from PCS handsets and route those communications to the intended source, using either the PCS system independently or using the PCS system to route the communications to the public switched telephone network (&#34;PSTN&#34;). Base stations also transmit communications to PCS handsets from other sources on the PCS system or from the PSTN. PCS systems may incorporate independent telephone switching and control centers or PCS operators may cooperate with local exchange carriers to utilize existing switching facilities operated by those carriers. Subscriber access to the PCS system is established by a radio communication link between the PCS handset and the base station. 
     The geographic area served by PCS operators is divided into a number of zones or cells, each of which is served by at least one base station. Dividing the geographic area into relatively small cells permits extremely efficient use of the spectrum because frequencies can be reused in geographically separated cells. Frequency reuse also permits large numbers of subscribers to be se system because numerous frequencies may be available in a given cell. PCS systems also may incorporate the capability of transferring a subscriber unit with a call in progress from cell to cell as the subscriber moves within the service area. 
     The implementation of PCS technology differs from traditional cellular telecommunications in that cellular systems have been designed with cells of comparatively large radii, requiring relatively high-power subscriber units. This design follows logically from the basic initial purpose of cellular telephone--to permit mobile telephone use in automobiles. Although hand-held portable cellular units have been developed, the comparatively high power required by cellular systems limits the ability of such handsets to use small and light power sources. PCS systems, in contrast, use a great number of much smaller radius cells, permitting PCS handsets to operate at much lower power because the handset-to-base station signal need only travel a relatively short distance. PCS handsets can thus be small, light and inexpensive. PCS handsets also can have applications in private local-area networks within buildings and for data transmission. 
     The essential distinguishing technical characteristic of PCS is that the frequencies identified for PCS by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and spectrum-allocation bodies throughout the world are currently occupied by other users. In the United States and several other countries, PCS will be required to share this spectrum with existing users. The FCC has indicated that it is likely to allocate the 1.85-1.99 GHz band to PCS. This band is occupied by private operational fixed microwave users, which use the band for point-to-point microwave transmissions. The challenge to PCS operators will be configuring systems around existing users without causing interference to those users. As a comparison, cellular licensees have clear spectrum and thus are concerned only with intrasystem (as opposed to intersystem) interference. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,144,412, 4,736,453, 4,481,670 and 4,485,486 are examples of such concepts, which will not account for interference concerns between PCS licensees and point-to-point microwave users. 
     Point-to-point microwave systems can employ different power levels, antenna gain, modulations, channel bandwidths, and other technical characteristics, and microwave usage varies significantly from area to area. In some areas, up to 100 MHz of spectrum with the 1.85-1.99 GHz band may be available for implementation of PCS, while in other areas as little as 25 MHz of spectrum may be available. To meet this challenge, the PCS industry will need a system and method for engineering PCS frequency use around existing microwave users that can be readily adapted to any area and most efficiently make use of the available communications spectrum in that area. Such a system must fully protect existing microwave users from interference and should take advantage of PCS technology advances in equipment and ensure that these advances are not inhibited nor hampered. The invention described in this Application is designed to serve this need. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention, a Frequency Agile Sharing Technology (FAST) system controls frequency usage within a PCS system to allow PCS systems to coexist in the same frequency band as Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service (POFS) systems without mutual interference. The present invention also controls frequency usage within a PCS system to eliminate interference within the PCS system. The invention combines theoretical radio frequency (RF) interference analyses with measurements of actual frequency usage. This interference elimination system allows for efficient and coordinated dynamic frequency allocation planning and management. 
     The present invention controls frequency assignments to each PCS base station. The present invention also controls which frequency at a particular base station is utilized when the system is accessed (i.e., a call is placed or received). 
     The mechanisms employed by the present invention to control frequency assignments to PCS base stations are an intersystem interference analysis, an intrasystem interference analysis, a channel use verification (CUV) procedure and a measured data analysis (MDA). These mechanisms are performed by a centralized controller, termed the Channel Utilization Controller (CUC). The CUC is comprised of interference analysis/frequency planning computer programs with supporting databases and data communication links to the PCS base stations via the PCS Telephone Switching Office (PTSO). 
     The mechanism employed by the present invention to control frequency assignments to each subscriber unit access of the PCS system is a Channel Selection Process (CSP) performed by the PCS base station during the call set-up procedure. 
     The first mechanism is an intersystem interference analysis performed by the CUC. The CUC performs a theoretical analysis of PCS channels that can be used without interference at each base station. This analysis is based upon the CUC&#39;s technical databases, propagation predictions and interference calculations. The technical databases contain information on all PCS base stations and all POFS stations including the following; transmit and receive frequencies, latitude, longitude, ground elevation, antenna, antenna height, transmitter power, transmission line losses and antenna gain. The CUC evaluates interference to POFS stations from PCS base stations and from PCS subscriber units. The CUC also evaluates interference to PCS base stations and to PCS subscriber units from POFS stations. In order to evaluate interference to and from PCS subscriber units within the service area of a PCS base station, the CUC utilizes a series of grid points around the PCS base station. Interference to and from PCS subscriber units is evaluated at each grid point location. 
     The second mechanism is an intrasystem interference analysis performed by the CUC. The CUC performs an analysis similar to the intersystem interference analysis except that interference to PCS subscriber unit signals received at PCS base stations from other PCS subscriber units is evaluated at PCS base stations. Additionally, interference to PCS base station signals received at PCS subscriber units from other PCS base stations is evaluated at each grid point. 
     The result of the intersystem and intrasystem interference analyses is the creation of an Available Channel List (ACL) for each PCS base station. Any channel that would cause or receive excessive intersystem or intrasystem interference is removed from the ACL by the CUC. 
     The third mechanism employed is a Channel Use Verification (CUV) procedure performed by the PCS base stations. The base stations measure signal strengths in all POFS microwave channels and all PCS channels and upload the measured data to the CUC. This measured CUV data is used by the CUC to verify the accuracy of the intersystem and intrasystem interference analyses and ensure that the ACL includes only interference-free channels. 
     The present invention also employs a Test Mobile Unit (TMU) which measures signal strengths in all POFS microwave channels and all PCS channels. The TMU is used to accumulate CUV measured data in the service area of a PCS base station. The TMU associates a coordinate location with each CUV measurement, preferably by utilizing a global positioning satellite (GPS) receiver or other locational analysis device. The measured data is uploaded to the CUC via a PCS base station, or stored electronically for later input to the CUC. The CUC utilizes the coordinate information associated with a TMU CUV measurement to compare TMU measured values to theoretical values calculated at the nearest base station grid point. This TMU CUV data is used by the CUC to verify the accuracy of the intersystem and intrasystem interference analyses at each base station grid point. 
     The fourth mechanism employed is a measured data analysis (MDA) performed by the CUC. After receiving the CUV measured data, the CUC compares actual measured signal strengths to the theoretical predicted signal strengths (determined in the intersystem and intrasystem analysis) to either verify or modify the ACL. Utilizing actual measured values to verify predicted values ensures that each channel in the ACL will neither cause nor receive interference. The PCS base station CUV data allows the CUC to verify interference predictions between PCS base stations and POFS stations. The TMU CUV data allows the CUC to verify interference predictions between PCS subscriber units and POFS stations. Both the PCS base station CUV data and the TMU CUV data allow the CUC to verify intrasystem interference predictions. 
     The result of these four mechanisms is an ACL for each PCS base station that only includes interference-free channels. The CUC downloads the ACL to the PCS base station and stores the data for future retrieval. These four mechanisms are performed when a new PCS base station is brought on-line, or modified, upon the request of the system operator or at specified intervals (i.e., every night or as often as necessary to maintain interference-free PCS and POFS communications), but not performed upon each system access by a subscriber unit. 
     The fifth mechanism employed is a Channel Selection Process (CSP) performed by the PCS base station during the call set-up procedure. This mechanism is employed upon every system access by a subscriber unit. As a result of the above four mechanisms, the ACL is developed and sent to each corresponding base station. Frequencies for establishing communications between a subscriber unit and a base station for a specific call are selected from the ACL. A further security against interference is provided by the CSP performed during the call set-up procedure. When a subscriber unit accesses the PCS system, both the subscriber unit and the base station measure the signal strength on each respective receive channel in the ACL. The subscriber unit transmits its measured data to the PCS base station which selects the best available channel pair for the voice/data link, i.e., the frequencies that will provide the highest carrier to interference (C/I) ratio. 
     Access to system traffic data allows the system operator to utilize the CUC to identify base stations requiring additional channels to handle busy hour traffic and base stations under-utilizing their channel capacity. Integrating the interference and system traffic analyses, the system operator can utilize the CUC to re-configure system frequency use to optimize system capacity. The system operator can obtain frequency deployment, system usage, coverage and interference reports from the CUC periodically, upon modification or upon request. 
     Accordingly, a primary objective of this invention is providing personal communications service to subscribers utilizing small, low power and lightweight handsets in the same frequency band as private fixed operational fixed microwave systems. 
     It is an object of the invention to provide instantaneous, interference-free communications capability anywhere within the PCS service area, indoors or outdoors. 
     It is an object of the invention to use frequency agility and low power signals so as to eliminate harmful interference to or from other communications systems. 
     It is an object of the invention to simultaneously transmit personal communications service signals in the same frequency band as existing microwave signals without appreciable interference to any signal. 
     It is an object of the invention to make frequency assignments subject to non-interference between signals within the system, i.e., intrasystem. 
     It is an object of the invention to make frequency assignments subject to non-interference between PCS signals and POFS signals, i.e., inter-system. 
     It is an object of the invention to increase communications capacity in a PCS system by more efficient use of the available spectrum. 
     It is an object of the invention to base design of a personal communications network on capacity requirements and actual propagational environment rather than on an inflexible communications plan. 
     These and other advantages, features and objectives of the invention and the manner of attaining them will become apparent and the invention will be best understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and appended claims. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a personal communications service (PCS) system displaying various elements of the system. 
     FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the components of the channel utilization controller (CUC). 
     FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the division of the 1850-1990 MHz band for frequency allocation to the PCS service. 
     FIG. 4 is a representation of the main menu of the CUC. 
     FIG. 5 is a map showing the grid points at the &#34;Jeff Davis&#34; site. 
     FIG. 6 is a flow chart used by the CUC for performing the theoretical intersystem interference analysis. 
     FIG. 7 is a flow chart used by the CUC for performing the theoretical intrasystem interference analysis. 
     FIG. 8 is a map showing the PCS base station sites and the theoretical hexagonal grid. 
     FIG. 9 is a diagram showing channel group assignments to base station locations. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a Personal Communication Service (PCS) system utilizing a Frequency Agile Sharing Technology (FAST) system 30 for providing high capacity, low cost portable telephone service in a shared frequency band with Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service (POFS) stations. Bellcore Framework Technical Advisory FA-NWT-001013, Issue 2, December 1990, &#34;Generic Framework Criteria for Universal Digital Personal Communications Systems (PCS)&#34;, provides an alternate functional description of a PCS system. The FAST system 30 is compatible with the Bellcore description of PCS systems. The FAST system 30 includes a plurality of base stations 32, a multitude of subscriber units 36 and one or more PCS Telephone Switching Offices (PTSO) 38 interconnected with the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) 40 or other switching centers such as a cellular Mobile Telephone Switching Offices (MTSO). Interconnection is preferably accomplished with a Type II interconnect to a class four central office. The Channel Utilization Controller (CUC) 50 controls the assignment of frequencies to each base station 32. 
     Base stations 32 include radio frequency (RF) signal transceivers for establishing radio communications links with subscriber units 36. Base stations 32 are interconnected to the PTSO 38 either directly or through concentrators 53 which reduce the cost of backhauling traffic by multiplexing the voice/data traffic of multiple base stations 32 onto a single communications link 55. Due to power constraints of small lightweight hand held portable phones 57, the PCS system preferably uses smaller radius base station 32 coverage areas than other communications systems such as cellular telephone systems. The base station 32 coverage areas can be enhanced by the use of distributed antenna systems, particularly to improve PCS service in indoor environments. 
     The use of broadband linear amplification systems allow base stations 32 to be tuned remotely to operate on any channel in the authorized band without the need for technicians to physically modify the base station 32. This method of amplification differs from traditional channel combining networks which utilize individual channel amplifiers combined through a multicoupler. 
     Subscriber units 36 communicate to base stations 32 by a wireless RF communications path. Subscriber units 36 can be portable telephones 57, portable phones with adapter units in automobiles 61 to allow the portable unit to utilize antennas 63 mounted on the exterior of the automobile 61, portable computers 64 or other communications devices. Examples of such devices include commercially available lightweight telephone handsets such as the Motorola Silverlink 2000 Personal Telephone or the Motorola Microtac Lite, commercially available adapters such as the Motorola S1757 Digital Hands Free Adapter or the Motorola S1945 Digital Personal Communicator Telephone Extended System, or commercially available data terminals such as the IBM 9075 PCradio or the Apple Powerbook equipped with a radio interface card. 
     The Test Mobile Unit (TMU) 68 has an omnidirectional antenna 70 attached to a tunable receiver controlled by amicroprocessor with data storage capacity for performing the Channel Use Verification (CUV) measurement procedure. Since the location of the TMU 68 is required with the interference calculations, the TMU 68 preferably includes a Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) receiver and antenna to fix location coordinates. 
     FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an important feature of the FAST system, the Channel Utilization Controller (CUC) 50. The CUC 50 controls the frequency assignments to the PCS base stations 32 using a central processing unit 74, input/output devices 77 and dedicated communications links 55, 80, 82 to the PCS base stations 32 via the PTSO 38. One embodiment of the CUC 50 is a microcomputer 86 which would house electronic storage media, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), I/O interfaces 88 and a commercially available microprocessor such as the Intel 80386. The electronic storage media, RAM, ROM and I/O devices 77 may be any commercially available devices that are suitable for operation with the type of microprocessor selected. The CUC 50 operating system, interference analysis programs, measured data analysis programs, I/O interface programs, data communication programs and supporting databases 90 are stored on a hard disk drive or other electronic storage media. Depending on the application, external memory devices, such as compact disk (CD) or Bernoulli box, may be required to store supporting databases 90. The preferred embodiment includes a disk or tape backup of the CUC 50 software to allow system recovery in case of failure. 
     To illustrate the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a scenario demonstrating the operation of the FAST system 30 can be described as follows: This scenario involves a hypothetical PCS system in operation in the Washington-Baltimore area. The hypothetical PCS system shares the 1850-1990 MHz band with hypothetical POFS stations. A specific architecture is presented for the PCS system and parameters identical to actual point-to-point microwave paths in the vicinity are used for the POFS facilities. This scenario demonstrates how the CUC 50 is used by the system operator to evaluate the addition of a PCS base station 32 and how frequency usage is controlled by the FAST system 30 to prevent intersystem and intrasystem interference. 
     The PCS system architecture described below is based upon one possible PCS standard. The FAST system 30 is not dependant upon this architecture. Rather, this architecture is presented to allow a more thorough description of the operation of the FAST system 30. The PCS architecture discussed below is based upon the GSM (Groupe Special Mobile) European digital cellular standards. The GSM standard, upbanded to the 1710-1880 MHz band has been selected for Personal Communications Network (PCN) systems in the U.K. and is under consideration in Germany. This upbanded GSM standard is referred to as the DCS-1800 standard and is a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) Frequency Division Duplexed (FDD) architecture. This standard uses a 200 kHz RF channel with eight voice slots per carrier. One time slot from one carrier in each sector is used as a control (signalling and access) channel. 
     Another possible PCS architecture is based upon the Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) system under development by Qualcomm, Inc. for U.S. digital cellular systems. The Qualcomm CDMA CAI standard is under consideration by Subcommittee TR45.5 of the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA). The FAST system 30 can be configured to operate with either of these two or any other relatively narrowband PCS system architecture, narrowband relative to POFS RF channel bandwidths (i.e. 5 MHz or less). The FAST system 30 can also be configured for Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) PCS architectures utilizing a variable transmit-receive separation or for Time Division Duplexed (TDD) PCS architectures in which transmit and receive functions are performed on distinct time slots on the same frequency. 
     In this scenario, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses two common carrier PCS system operators (Licensee A and Licensee B) in each market. The FCC has not determined the geographic areas in which PCS licensees will be authorized to provide service. In this example, the authorized area for Licensee A is the Washington-Baltimore Major Trading Area identified in the Rand McNally 1992 Commercial Atlas &amp; Marketing Guide. The 1850-1990 MHz band 104 is allocated to the PCS service as follows: the 1850-1875 MHz band 106 reserved for Licensee A subscriber unit 36 to base station 32 transmissions, the 1875-1900 MHz band 108 reserved for Licensee B subscriber unit 36 to base station 32 transmissions, the 1930-1955 MHz band 111 reserved for Licensee A base station 32 to subscriber unit 36 transmissions and the 1955-1980 MHz band 114 reserved for Licensee B base station 32 to subscriber unit 36 transmissions. A diagram of this division of the 1850-1990 MHz band is illustrated in FIG. 3. The division of the allocated frequency bands into distinct channels is provided in the table of appendix A. For comparison, the division of the allocated frequency bands into distinct channels for the CDMA PCS system is provided in the table of appendix B. 
     This frequency allocation scheme provides for an 80 MHz separation between transmit and receive (Tx-Rx) frequencies which matches the Tx-Rx frequency separation for POFS stations under Section 94.65 of the FCC Rules. It is recognized that some microwave links vary from the standard 80 MHz transmit-receive separation. In these isolated cases, moving the microwave link into another frequency band does not guarantee that both PCS base station 32 transmit and PCS subscriber unit 36 transmit frequencies will be made available to the PCS system. 
     Appendix C is a table of POFS microwave channels. This provides advantages in spectrum sharing with POFS paths. American Personal Communications (APC), which holds an experimental license (Call Sign--KC2XDM, File No.--2056-EX-ML-91) from the FCC to test PCS services and technologies, has demonstrated that sufficient spectrum exists in the 1850-1990 MHz band 104 to launch the PCS service without migrating existing POFS licensees out of the band. This is described in American Personal Communications, &#34;Frequency Agile Sharing Technology (&#34;FAST&#34;) Report on Spectrum Sharing in the 1850-1990 MHz Band Between Personal Communications Services and Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service, Volume I&#34;, July 1991. In the very few areas where an existing licensee needs to be moved out of the band, APC has proposed a private negotiation between the parties. This is substantially what has been proposed by the FCC in FCC Notice of Proposed Rule Making, &#34;In the Matter of Redevelopment of Spectrum to Encourage Innovation in the Use of Telecommunications Technologies&#34;, ET Docket No. 92-9, Adopted Jan. 16, 1992, Released Feb.  7, 1992. Under this negotiated migration, the 80 MHz Tx-Rx separation guarantees that when a POFS path is relocated (in frequency), both PCS base station 32 transmit and PCS subscriber unit 36 transmit frequencies will be available for the PCS system. 
     In this scenario, Licensee A has initiated PCS service in portions of the Washington-Baltimore market area. Licensee A has determined that it will extend its PCS service to National Airport and the Crystal City area of Arlington, Va. The precise service area and expected demand have been determined by the marketing and planning groups of Licensee A. It is now the job of the radio frequency (RF) engineer to design a new base station 32 to serve the targeted area. The RF engineer accesses the CUC 50 to assist in this process. 
     A representation of the main menu 122 of the CUC 50 is provided as FIG. 4. The PCS base station database 92 supporting the CUC 50 contains entries for each base station 32. Sample database entries for two representative hypothetical PCS base stations, &#34;Chester Building&#34; 322 and &#34;Smith Office Building&#34; 323, are provided as the table in appendix D. The POFS database 90 supporting the CUC 50 contains entries for every microwave station in the region. This would include all microwave stations which could cause or receive interference from a PCS system. The criterion for inclusion could be a fixed mileage separation, a coordinate block or by county. Sample database entries for six representative POFS microwave stations (3 paths) are provided as the table in appendix E. 
     The RF engineer can identify several buildings as good potential candidates for the new base station 32 by accessing aerial or satellite photographs, building data and/or topographic maps of the area stored electronically in databases 70 supporting the CUC 50. The RF engineer now examines the operating parameters of the base station 32 (antenna, power, height, frequencies) to design a facility that will meet the coverage and capacity targets. 
     The RF engineer uses the CUC&#39;s 50 propagation models to examine coverage predictions for each potential site. A data base entry is created for the new base station 32 which allows alternate sites, multiple antenna configurations, antenna heights and radiated powers all to be easily examined by modifying the base station 32 parameters. The coverage predictions are overlayed on the digitized maps of the area and displayed on a system monitor 78. The RF engineer can also direct these displays to the system plotter 77 to create hard copies of the images for progress report meetings with site acquisition, marketing and management personnel. 
     After examining the coverage predictions of several potential sites, the RF engineer settles on the &#34;Jeff Davis&#34; location as the best potential site for the new base station 321. 
     To calculate coverage, the RF engineer selects the Theoretical Propagation Analyses 124, Coverage Option 126 from the CUC main menu 122. The CUC 50 then allows the RF engineer to select the propagation model to be used in the analysis. In the preferred embodiment, a variety of models are offered: Free Space, Hata, Longley-Rice and a proprietary model developed by the licensee. In this case, the RF engineer selects the Hata propagation model of the type described in Masaharu Hata, &#34;Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land Mobile Radio Services&#34;, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. VT-29, No. 3, August 1980. In the preferred embodiment, the propagation prediction models access information contained in the terrain and building databases. 
     The CUC 50 allows the RF engineer to adjust the service threshold (i.e., the minimum signal strength required by the receiver to provide reliable service) utilized in the study. The service threshold is utilized by the CUC 50 in the determination of channel availability as described below. In this case, the RF engineer selects a service threshold of -96 dBm. 
     The CUC 50 predicts coverage by calculating the signal level at a series of points 130 in the vicinity of the site. These points are arranged in a grid 135, centered on the base station 321. The RF engineer can adjust the size of the geographic area included in the study by adjusting the size of the grid 135. In general the grid 135 size is selected to coincide with the base station 321 coverage area. The detail, or graininess, of the study is adjusted by selecting the number of points 130 within the grid 135. Increasing the number of points 130 in the grid 135, increases the number of calculations and therefore affects the length of time necessary to complete the study. The number of grid points 135 is, therefore, selected to balance detail and speed. In this case, the RF engineer selects a fifteen by fifteen (15 by 15) grid 135 with twenty (20) seconds of longitude between each column and fifteen (15) seconds of latitude between each row. This area is appropriate for the theoretical grid 135 based upon a 1.67 mile base station service radius described below. The grid 135 selected for the Jeff Davis site is shown on FIG. 5. 
     The CUC 50 allows the RF engineer to designate certain grid points as critical points 137. This designation is used by the CUC 50 in the determination of channel availability as described below. The RF engineer can specify critical points 137 in a variety of ways; all grid points 130, points within a specified distance or individually by row and column. In this example, the RF engineer designates all grid points 137 within 1.67 miles of the base station as critical. On FIG. 5, critical grid points 137 are shown as &#34;+&#34; marks, non-critical grid points 139 are shown as &#34;x&#34; marks. The grid point coinciding with the base station 321 site is shown as a circled &#34;+&#34; mark. 
     If the predicted signal strength value at a critical grid point 137 is below the selected service threshold, the CUC 50 provides the RF engineer with a report. This allows the RF engineer to modify the base station parameters to better serve the critical areas, or re-designate the particular grid points 130 as non-critical 139. 
     The grid points, critical designation and predicted signal strength values are stored in the PCS database 92. In this example, one of the grid points, grid point (row 5, column 6), is critical and the predicted Jeff Davis signal strength value at this point is -89.4 dBm. This predicted value is above the selected -96 dBm threshold. 
     Once the RF engineer has determined the parameters for the proposed base station that will allow the new facility to serve the targeted area, he uses the CUC 50 to determine the channel availability at the new facility. 
     The base station parameters selected for the new site, Jeff Davis 321, are depicted on the table of appendix F. The CUC 50 is used to perform an analysis of channels that can be used at the Jeff Davis site and by subscriber units 36 in the Jeff Davis service area without interference to or from POFS stations (intersystem interference analysis) or other PCS base stations 32 (intrasystem interference analysis) using theoretical propagation predictions. These analyses yield the Available Channel List (ACL) for the new base station. 
     The RF engineer begins by selecting the Theoretical Propagation Analyses 124, Intersystem Evaluation 127 from the main menu 122 of the CUC 50. A flow chart for the intersystem interference analysis is provided as FIG. 6. 
     Referring to FIG. 6, the RF engineer selects the propagation model 200 to be used in the analysis. In this case, the RF engineer selects the Hata propagation model. 
     The CUC 50 then provides the RF engineer with the opportunity to adjust the PCS-POFS interference criteria 202. The default values for interference to PCS facilities from cochannel POFS facilities is 12 dB. This means that the desired PCS signal strength must be at least 12 dB above the undesired POFS signal strength for interference free service. The adjacent channel interference criteria is dependant upon the number of MHz the PCS channel is removed from the POFS carrier frequency. For PCS channels immediately adjacent to a POFS channel (5.1 MHz removed from the POFS carrier frequency), the default interference criterion is 0 db. For PCS channels 5.3 MHz removed from the POFS carrier frequency, the default interference criterion is -10 dB. In this case, the RF engineer does not adjust the default criteria. 
     The default interference criteria to POFS stations from PCS facilities utilizes EIA Bulletin 10 (Electronic Industries Association, Engineering Department, EIA/TIA Telecommunications Systems Bulletin, &#34;Interference Criteria for Microwave Systems in the Private Radio Services&#34;, TSB10-E, November 1990) definitions for interference, e.g., a 1 dB degradation to 30 dB signal to noise (S/N) for analog POFS links and a 10 -6  to 10 -5  bit error rate (BER) degradation for digital POFS links. In applying these criteria, the &#34;standard&#34; Bulletin 10 methodology enforces an interference level relative to threshold sensitivity without consideration of received signal levels or fade margins. 
     This standard methodology creates some anomalies which need to be corrected. For example, consider a 1 mile microwave path and a 10 mile microwave path with identical transmitting and receiving equipment. Under the &#34;standard&#34; methodology, the undesired PCS signal level necessary to cause interference is the same for both paths although the shorter path operates at a higher receive signal level, has a greater operating margin over the receiver threshold and therefore could tolerate a higher undesired PCS signal level than the longer path. 
     A number of possible modifications to the Bulletin 10 standards have been proposed and FCC Docket No. 92-9 provides a forum for industry comment on these proposals. In the preferred embodiment, the CUC 50 will provide the RF engineer with the industry accepted criteria for PCS-POFS interference with the possibility of utilizing alternate methods. 
     In this scenario, the RF engineer selects 202 the following method of calculating interference to POFS stations from PCS stations: 
     1. Analog microwave links require 16 dB above noise (thermal or interference) to maintain 30 dB S/N. Digital links require 26 dB above noise to maintain 10 -6  BER. 
     2. Calculate the fade margin required for the microwave link as a function of path distance cubed, i.e., fade margin=30 log D where D is path length in miles. 
     3. Calculate the desired POFS unfaded receive signal strength, subtract 16 or 26 dB as appropriate, subtract the required fade margin. This yields the allowed undesired PCS signal level. In no case will the undesired PCS signal level be required to be less than 6 dB below thermal noise (kTB+NF), i.e., 99 dBm-6 dB=-105 dBm. 
     To evaluate intersystem interference under the selected criteria, the CUC 50 retrieves the operating parameters of the first POFS facility, WXX818, from the POFS database 90 and the parameters of WXX819, the other side of the point-to-point microwave path, step 204 in FIG. 6. These microwave station parameters are first utilized to calculate the desired unfaded receive signal level at WXX818 of the signal transmitted from WXX819 on 1935 MHz. This microwave channel, 1935 MHz, occupies a 10 MHz band from 1930 to 1940 MHz. 
     The calculation of the unfaded receive signal is made by taking the WXX819 transmitter power output, 25.0 dBm, subtracting the WXX819 transmission line loss, 6.0 dB, adding the WXX819 transmit antenna gain, 33.1 dBi, calculating and subtracting the free space path loss from WXX819 to WXX811, 120.2 dB, adding the WXX818 receive antenna gain, 33.1 dBi and subtracting the WXX818 transmission line loss, 2 dB. The unfaded receive signal is -37.0 dBm. The path length from WXX819 to WXX818 is 7.8 miles, therefore, the required fade margin is 26.8 dB. Since this is an analog path, the allowed undesired PCS signal level is -37.0-16-26.8=-79.8 dBm. The total interference power from all PCS cochannel and adjacent channel sources, therefore, must be less than -79.8 dBm. 
     The CUC 50 then retrieves the receiver selectivity performance specification from the WXX818 database entry. This performance specification tabulates how well the receiver rejects power from signals outside the 1930-1940 MHz band. In this example, the WXX818 receiver attenuates signals between 5 and 7 MHz removed from 1935 MHz by 6 dB, signals between 7 and 10 MHz removed from 1935 MHz by 15 dB and signals more than 10 MHz removed from 1935 MHz by at least 60 dB. This tabulation allows the CUC 50 to calculate signal levels from PCS channels adjacent to the 1930-1940 MHz band. 
     Since PCS subscriber units 36 for Licensee A operate in the 1850-1875 MHz band 106, they have no impact on WXX818 reception of 1935 MHz. Potential interference to WXX818 comes from PCS base station operation in the 1930-1955 MHz band 111. Therefore, the CUC 50 retrieves the undesired signal strengths for all other PCS base stations 32 from the WXX818 database entry. The CUC 50 also retrieves each PCS base station ACL. The CUC 50 sums the total received power from all other PCS base stations 32 that use frequencies cochannel and adjacent to 1955 MHz to determine how much power can be contributed by the Jeff Davis site 321 without exceeding the -79.8 dBm interference criteria, shown as 206 in FIG. 6. In this case, all other PCS base stations 32 using frequencies cochannel and adjacent channel to 1955 MHz have a combined signal level of -86.2 dBm. 
     At step 220 of FIG. 6, the CUC 50 then calculates the undesired signal strength from the Jeff Davis site 321 at the WXX818 receiver. The Jeff Davis effective radiated power (ERP) in the direction of WXX818 is calculated from the antenna, transmitter and transmission line information stored in the Jeff Davis database entry. The propagation loss between Jeff Davis and WXX818 is then determined from the selected Hata propagation model. The predicted Jeff Davis signal strength is then adjusted by the WXX818 receive antenna gain in the direction of Jeff Davis and the receive antenna polarization discrimination. This analysis yields the undesired received signal strength from Jeff Davis at WXX818. The undesired Jeff Davis signal strength value is stored in the WXX818 database entry 222. 
     If the undesired Jeff Davis received signal strength at WXX818 is greater than -79.8 dBm then all cochannel PCS base station transmit channels, channels one through fifty (1-50) for Licensee A, and all adjacent channels, channels fifty-one through seventy-five (51-75) for Licensee A, are removed from the ACL at step 224 of FIG. 6. Removing these PCS base station channels from the Jeff Davis ACL also removes the paired PCS subscriber unit frequencies from use in the Jeff Davis service area. In this example, the calculated undesired Jeff Davis signal level is -89.1 dBm. 
     The use of a single PCS channel in the 1930-1940 MHz band at Jeff Davis increases the total power received by WXX818 from all PCS interfering sources from -86.2 to -84.4 dBm. Adding the -89.1 dBm (1.2 E-9 mW) signal to the -86.2 dBm (2.4 E-9 mW) total power yields -84.4 dBm (3.6 E-9 mW). The table of appendix G provides details on the calculations of total interfering power. This total power is below the allowed -79.8 dBm limit. Similarly, the use of two PCS channels in the 1930-1940 MHz band at Jeff Davis increases the total interfering power to -83.1 dBm and is still below the -79.8 dBm limit. The CUC 50 determines that the use of six channels from the 1930-1940 MHz band at Jeff Davis increases the total interfering power at WXX818 to -80.1 dBm, and that adding the seventh channel pushes the total interfering power to -79.6 dBm and over the -79.8 dBm limit. 
     Therefore, the CUC 50 provides the RF engineer the opportunity to specify which six channels from the 1930-1940 MHz band will remain in the Jeff Davis ACL. In this case the RF engineer selects channels one through six and the CUC 50 removes channels seven through fifty from the Jeff Davis ACL. The total interfering power at WXX818 increases to -80.1 dBm as a result of the use of these six channels at Jeff Davis. The selection of a re-use factor in the intrasystem analysis described below provides the RF engineer the opportunity to modify which channels from the 1930-1940, 1940-1942 and 1942-1945 MHz bands remain in the ACL. 
     The CUC 50 performs a similar process for analyzing PCS channels in the frequency bands adjacent to 1930-1940 MHz. Usually, the CUC 50 would examine frequencies above and below the microwave channel, however, in this case, frequencies below 1930 MHz are out of Licensee A&#39;s allocated frequency bands 111. PCS channels in the 1940-1942 MHz band are 5 to 7 MHz removed from the center of microwave channel. Therefore, the CUC 50 reduces the undesired Jeff Davis signal strength by the receiver selectivity: -89.1 dBm-6 dB=-95.1. There are ten PCS channels in the 1940-1942 MHz band, channels fifty-one through sixty (51-60). Utilizing one channel in the 1940-1942 MHz band at Jeff Davis would increase the total interfering power at WXX818 from -80.1 dBm to -80.0 dBm, adding a second channel increases the total interfering power exactly to the -79.8 dBm limit. Therefore, two channels from the 1940-1942 MHz band can be utilized at Jeff Davis, however, the use of two channels from this band would preclude the use of any channels from the 1942-1945 MHz band at Jeff Davis. Therefore, although the CUC 50 provides the RF engineer the opportunity to select two channels from the 1940-1942 MHz band, the RF engineer selects a only single channel, channel fifty-one (51), from this band. The CUC 50 removes channels fifty-two (52) through sixty (60) from the Jeff Davis ACL. The total interfering power at WXX818 increases to -80.0 dBm as a result of the use of this channel at Jeff Davis. 
     Finally, the CUC 50 performs a similar process for analyzing PCS channels in the 1942-1945 MHz band. PCS channels in the 1942-1945 MHz band are 7 to 10 MHz removed from the center of microwave channel. Therefore, the CUC 50 reduces the undesired Jeff Davis signal strength by the receiver selectivity: -89.1 dBm-15 dB=-104.1. There are fifteen PCS channels in the 1942-1945 MHz band, channels sixty-one through seventy-five (61-75). The CUC 50 determines that the use of twelve channels from this band at Jeff Davis increases the total interfering power at WXX818 right to the allowed -79.8 dBm limit. The thirteenth channel from this band would push the total power over the allowed limit. Therefore, the CUC 50 provides the RF engineer the opportunity to select twelve channels from the 1942-1945 MHz band. In this case, the RF engineer selects channels sixty-one through seventy-two and the CUC 50 removes channels 73, 74 and 75 from the Jeff Davis ACL. The total interfering power at WXX818  increases to the -79.8 dBm limit as a result of the use of these channels at the Jeff Davis base station 321. 
     The CUC 50 then calculates potential interference to Jeff Davis from WXX818&#39;s transmit frequency, 1855 MHz. WXX818 transmissions on 1855 MHz cannot interfere with PCS subscriber unit receive frequencies (1930-1955 MHz) 111 and therefore, the potential interference evaluation is limited to a calculation at the Jeff Davis base station 321. The CUC 50 calculates an undesired WXX818 signal level at the Jeff Davis base station 321 (as shown as step 226 in FIG. 6) using the WXX818 transmitter power output, antenna gain, antenna radiation pattern and Hata propagation loss. This calculated value is stored in the Jeff Davis database entry 228. 
     The undesired WXX818 signal strength is then compared to the selected service threshold 230. If the undesired WXX818 signal does not meet the selected 12 dB C/I ratio, then PCS channels one through fifty (1-50) are removed from the Jeff Davis ACL. If the undesired WXX818 signal does not meet the selected 0 dB C/I ratio, then PCS channel fifty-one (51) is removed from the Jeff Davis ACL. If the undesired WXX818 signal does not meet the selected -10 dB C/I ratio, then PCS channel fifty-two (52) is removed from the Jeff Davis ACL. In this example, the undesired WXX818 signal strength is -110.2 dBm and is more than 12 dB below the selected -96 dBm threshold. Therefore, WXX818 transmission on 1855 MHz has no effect on the Jeff Davis ACL. 
     An undesired WXX818 signal level is also calculated at each Jeff Davis grid point 130 even though WXX818 transmissions on 1855 MHz cannot interfere with PCS subscriber unit receive frequencies (1930-1955 MHz), as shown as 232 in FIG. 6. These calculations are made at each grid point 130 for later comparison to CUV measured values in the MDA evaluation described below. The &#34;expected&#34; undesired WXX818 signal level at each grid point is stored in the Jeff Davis database entry 234. 
     When the CUC 50 completes its analysis of potential interference to and from WXX818 it then retrieves the next POFS microwave station, WXX819, as step 204 in FIG. 6, for intersystem interference evaluation 127. 
     The desired unfaded receive signal level at WXX819 of the signal transmitted from WXX818 on 1855 MHz is calculated exactly as described above for WXX818. This microwave channel, 1855 MHz, occupies a 10 MHz band from 1850 to 1860 MHz. Since PCS base stations for Licensee A operate in the 1930-1955 MHz band, they have no impact on WXX819 reception of 1855 MHz. As shown in step 208 in FIG. 6, potential interference to WXX819 comes from PCS subscriber unit operation in the 1850-1875 MHz band 106. In this case the desired unfaded receive signal level at WXX819 is -36.6 dBm and the total allowed interfering power is: -36.6-16-26.8=-79.4 dBm 210. 
     For a GSM type PCS architecture with 8 voice channels per carrier, as many as eight subscriber units at a given grid point could utilize the same frequency. Since each unit would operate in a distinct time slot, however, the potential interference from these units should not be additive. For a Qualcomm CDMA type PCS architecture, as many as 40 or more subscriber units could utilize the same frequency at the same location at the same time. For this type of architecture, the CUC 50 would include the additive effect of multiple subscriber units 36 at each grid point 130 in the interference analyses. 
     To determine how much power can be contributed by subscriber units 36 in the Jeff Davis service area without exceeding the total allowed interfering power at WXX819, the CUC 50 retrieves from the WXX819 database entry, the undesired signal strengths from the &#34;worst case&#34; grid point of all other PCS base stations 32. The CUC 50 also retrieves the ACL for each PCS base station 32. The CUC 50 then sums the total received power from PCS subscriber units 36 at the worst case grid points of all PCS base stations that use frequencies cochannel and adjacent channel to 1855 MHz. In this case, the total received interfering power level is -99.3 dBm. 
     The CUC 50 then calculates the undesired signal strength at the WXX819 receiver from a subscriber unit 36 at each Jeff Davis grid point 210. The undesired signal level is calculated from the subscriber unit ERP and the Hata propagation loss and is adjusted by the WXX819 receive antenna gain in the direction of the Jeff Davis grid point and the receive antenna polarization discrimination. This analysis yields the undesired received signal strength at WXX819 from a subscriber unit at each Jeff Davis grid point. The highest undesired received signal strength, i.e., the undesired signal from the &#34;worst case&#34; grid point, is stored in the WXX819 database entry 212. In this example, the worst case Jeff Davis grid point (row 3, column 4) produces an undesired signal level of -102.6 dBm at WXX819. 
     Grid points 130 that do not receive a desired signal from the Jeff Davis base station 321 above the selected service threshold (-96 dBm), are not included in the interference analyses. The rationale for this exclusion is as follows: if a subscriber unit 36 cannot receive service from a base station 32 at a given grid point 130, it cannot operate on a frequency assigned by that base station 32 and therefore, cannot be a source of potential interference to a POFS station (or other PCS base station). Furthermore, if the desired signal at a given grid point 130 is insufficient to provide service, the signal level from an undesired source is not important. 
     The CUC 50 then performs an analysis of channels in the 1850-1860, 1860-1862 and 1862-1865 MHz bands that can be used at the worst case Jeff Davis grid point without increasing the total interfering power, -99.3 dBm, over the allowed -79.4 dBm limit. This analysis is virtually identical to the process described above for the 1930-1940, 1940-1942 and 1942-1945 MHz bands. Because the PCS system and the POFS stations utilize an 80 MHz transmit-receive separation, the limits on frequency use at Jeff Davis imposed by protection requirements to WXX811, have reduced the potential channels in the 1850-1860 MHz band to six, the potential channels in the 1860-1862 MHz band to one and the potential channels in the 1862-1865 MHz band to twelve. In this case, the use of all of these channels at the worst case Jeff Davis grid point (row 3, column 4) does not increase the total interfering power at WXX819 above the -79.4 dBm limit. 
     The CUC 50 then calculates potential interference to Jeff Davis from WXX819&#39;s transmit frequency, 1935 MHz, as shown in step 236 of FIG. 6. WXX819 transmissions on 1935 MHz cannot interfere with PCS base station receive frequencies (1850-1875 MHz) and therefore, the potential interference evaluation is performed at each Jeff Davis grid point. The CUC 50 calculates an undesired WXX819 signal level at each Jeff Davis grid point 130 using the WXX819 transmitter power output, antenna gain, antenna radiation pattern and Hata propagation loss. These calculated values are stored in the Jeff Davis database entry 240. 
     As shown in step 244 of FIG. 6, at each grid point 130, the undesired WXX819 signal level is compared to the desired Jeff Davis signal level calculated above in the Theoretical Propagation Analysis 124, Coverage 126 analysis. If the WXX819 signal strength is too high at a critical grid point 137 receiving a desired signal above the selected service threshold, the appropriate PCS channels are removed from the ACL. If that grid point is not designated as critical, the predicted interference is reported but the channel is not removed from the ACL. In this example, at grid point (row 5, column 6) the desired Jeff Davis signal strength is -89.4 dBm and the undesired WXX819 value is -104.3 dBm. At this critical grid point 137 the 12 dB C/I cochannel ratio and both adjacent channel ratios are met. 
     As shown in step 248 of FIG. 6, an undesired WXX819 signal level is also calculated at the Jeff Davis base station even though WXX819 transmissions on 1935 MHz cannot interfere with PCS base station receive frequencies (1850-1875 MHz) 106. This calculations is made for later comparison to CUV measured values in the MDA evaluation described below. The &#34;expected&#34; undesired WXX819 signal level at the Jeff Davis base station 321 is stored in the Jeff Davis database entry 252. 
     The intersystem interference analysis is completed when all POFS stations in the database 92 have been evaluated, as shown in step 256 of FIG. 6. As shown as step 260 in FIG. 6, the completed ACL is stored in the PCS base station database 92. The CUC 50 then provides the RF engineer with detailed reports and graphic displays of the intersystem interference analysis. 
     After completing the intersystem interference analysis, the RF engineer selects the Theoretical Propagation Analyses 124, Intrasystem Evaluation 128 from the main menu 122 of the CUC 50. A flow chart for the intrasystem interference analysis is provided as FIG. 7. 
     The CUC 50 allows the RF engineer to apply a frequency re-use factor to the ACL for the Jeff Davis site 280. If a hexagonal grid 300, consisting of hexagonal cells 303, is used as the basis for base station 32 site locations, a frequency re-use factor can be employed to fix cochannel frequency re-use within the system to regular geographic separations. The re-use factor can be determined from the following relationship as described in V. H. MacDonald, &#34;The Cellular Concept&#34;, The Bell System Technical Journal, January 1979, Vol. 58, No. 1.: 
     
         N=i.sup.2 +ij+j.sup.2 
    
     where i,j are integers and i&gt;=j 
     A frequency re-use plan helps control intrasystem interference and is used in the cellular industry. Because of the low antenna heights and the discrete base station 32 coverage areas of a PCS system, it is believed that fixed frequency re-use plans will be too inflexible for a mature PCS system. However, in the preferred embodiment, the CUC 50 provides the capability of utilizing a frequency re-use factor. 
     For the GSM type PCS system described herein, the RF engineer utilizes an N=3 frequency re-use factor (i=1, j=1) in the channel availability determination. The PCS sites fall on a theoretical grid 300 based upon a base station service radius of 1.67 miles. A map of the PCS base station sites and the theoretical grid 300 is included as FIG. 8. An N=3 re-use plan divides the PCS channels into three groups. The channel groups, 1, 2 and 3, are assigned to base stations on the theoretical grid 300 on a one-up (i=1) and one-over (j=1) pattern as depicted on FIG. 9. The RF engineer also uses a three sector system, i.e., three 120° antennas are utilized instead of an omnidirectional antenna, at some sites to decrease intrasystem cochannel interference. The three sector system divides each of the three channel groups into three sub-groups as shown on the table in appendix H. 
     Using the N=3 re-use pattern, the RF engineer selects the appropriate channel group for the Jeff Davis site 132, i.e., Group 1. Since the RF engineer has selected an omnidirectional antenna for the Jeff Davis site 132, i.e., it is not a sectorized site, the ACL can include channels from Groups 1A, 1B and 1C. However, as a result of the intersystem interference analysis, the ACL is limited to six channels from the 1930-1940 MHz band, one channel from the 1940-1942 MHz band and twelve channels from the 1942-1945 MHz band. 
     The CUC 50 then provides an opportunity for the RF engineer to modify the selected channels in the ACL to conform to the channel re-use plan he has selected. In order to comply with the interference protection requirements, the RF engineer selects the following channels from the 1930-1940 MHz band: 
     From Group 1A: 1, 10, 19, 28, 37, 46 
     From Group 1B: none 
     From Group 1C: none 
     and the following channels from the 1940-1942 MHz band: 
     From Group 1A: 55 
     From Group 1B: none 
     From Group 1C: none 
     and the following channels from the 1942-1945 MHz band: 
     From Group 1A: 64, 73 
     From Group 1B: 67 
     From Group 1 C: 61, 70 
     In addition the following channels are not precluded by the intersystem interference analysis, are compatible with the selected re-use plan and therefore are included in the ACL: 
     From Group 1A: 82, 91,100, 109, 118 
     From Group 1B: 76, 85, 94, 103, 112, 121 
     From Group 1C: 79, 88, 97, 106, 115, 124 
     The RF engineer then selects the base stations 32 to be included in the intrasystem interference analysis. The RF engineer can select these base stations 32 in a variety of ways: individually from a master list, within a fixed distance, cochannel sites or adjacent channel sites. In this case, the RF engineer only includes the two base stations 32 shown in the table in appendix D in the interference analysis. The intrasystem interference analysis is performed by calculating the signal level of each base station 32 included in the study at each Jeff Davis grid point 130. Additionally, the intrasystem interference analysis calculates the signal level from the Jeff Davis base station 321 to the grid points 130 of each of the other base stations 32 included in the study. 
     The RF engineer then selects the propagation model to be used in the interference analysis 284. In this case, the RF engineer selects the Hata propagation model. 
     Finally, the RF engineer can adjust the interference criteria used in the analysis 288. In this case, the RF engineer selects a cochannel interference criterion of 12 dB. The RF engineer selects an adjacent channel interference criterion of -10 dB. 
     To evaluate potential intrasystem interference, the CUC 50 calculates the predicted signal strength from the first selected base station, Chester Building 322, to each of the Jeff Davis grid points using the selected propagation model in step 324 of FIG. 7. The CUC retrieves the operating parameters of the Chester Building base station 322, retrieves the coordinates of the first grid point 130, verifies that the calculated desired signal strength is above the service threshold 332 and checks to see if the grid point 130 is a critical point 137. The effective radiated power (ERP) from Chester Building 322 to the first grid point 130 is calculated from the antenna radiation pattern, antenna orientation, transmitter power and transmission line loss. Since the Chester Building site is a sectored site, the CUC calculates the ERP from each sector to the grid point 130. The propagation loss between Chester Building 322 and the grid point 130 is then determined from the selected propagation model. The undesired signal strengths from the Chester Building sectors are determined from the ERPs and the propagation loss. The calculated undesired signal strengths are stored in the Jeff Davis database entry 336. 
     The calculated undesired signal from each Chester Building sector is compared to the desired signal strength from the Jeff Davis site calculated in the coverage analysis described above. If the desired to undesired signal strength ratio does not meet the cochannel interference criteria at a critical grid point 137, the CUC 50 removes the channels from the ACL that are cochannel with the channels in the specific Chester Building sector, as shown as step 344 in FIG. 7. For example, the calculated desired signal strength at grid point 130 (row 5, column 6) is -89.4 dBm and the calculated undesired signal strength from Chester Building Sector 2 (antenna orientation=165°) is -94.3, the C/I ratio at this grid point 130 is only 4.9 and does not meet the specified 12 dB criterion. Since grid point (row 5, column 6) is a critical point 137, all channels in the Jeff Davis ACL that are cochannel with the channels in Chester Building Sector 2 are removed from the ACL. In this case Group 1B channels; 67, 76, 85 and 94 are removed from the Jeff Davis ACL. 
     Similarly, if the desired to undesired signal strength ratio does not meet the adjacent channel interference criteria at a critical grid point 137, the CUC 50 removes the channels from the ACL that are adjacent to the channels in the specific Chester Building sector 344. In this case, the adjacent channel interference criterion is met at every Jeff Davis grid point 130. 
     The CUC 50 also calculates the received signal strength at the Chester Building site 322 from a subscriber unit 36 at the Jeff Davis grid point 130. The undesired subscriber unit signal level is calculated from the subscriber unit ERP and the Hata propagation loss and is adjusted by the Chester Building receive antenna gain in the direction of the Jeff Davis grid point 130. To apply the cochannel and adjacent channel interference criteria, the CUC 50 utilizes the selected service threshold, -96 dBm, as the desired signal level at the Chester Building base station 322 and compares this value to the undesired Jeff Davis subscriber unit 36 signal strength. If the undesired subscriber unit 36 signal level is not at least 12 dB below the service threshold, the CUC 50 removes cochannel frequencies from the ACL. Similarly, if the adjusted undesired subscriber unit 36 signal level is more than 10 dB above the service threshold, the CUC 50 removes adjacent channel frequencies from the ACL. In this case, the cochannel and adjacent channel interference criteria are met at the Chester Building base station 322 from every Jeff Davis grid point 130. 
     The CUC 50 then performs an analysis of potential interference between the Jeff Davis base station 321 and each Chester Building grid point 130, as shown in step 348 of FIG. 7. This analysis is identical to the analysis described above for interference between the Chester Building base station 321 and the Jeff Davis grid points 130. The expected undesired Jeff Davis signal strengths at each Chester Building grid point 130 are stored in the Chester Building database entry. In this case, no further adjustments to the Jeff Davis ACL are necessary. 
     After completing the evaluation of the Chester Building site 322, the CUC 50 retrieves the parameters of the Smith Office Building site 323 and performs the same potential interference analysis as described above. The Jeff Davis site 321 does not have any frequencies that are cochannel to nor adjacent channel to any frequencies at the Smith Office Building site 323. Nevertheless, the CUC 50 calculates the signal levels from the Smith Office Building site 323 to each Jeff Davis grid point 130 and from the Jeff Davis site 321 to each Smith Office Building grid point 130. These calculations are made and stored in the respective database entries, as shown in step 352 in FIG. 7, for later comparison to CUV measured values in the MDA evaluation described below. 
     The CUC 50 then provides the RF engineer with detailed reports and graphic displays of the intrasystem interference analysis. 
     After completing the theoretical analysis of the Jeff Davis site 321, the RF engineer utilizes the Test Mobile Unit (TMU) 68 to obtain measurement data which is used to verify coverage and interference predictions. In the preferred embodiment, the TMU 68 is a portable device which allows a field technician to traverse the intended service area of the Jeff Davis base station 321 and collect measured signal strength readings on POFS channels and PCS control channels. This data is collected by the TMU 68 by performing the CUV procedure. 
     The TMU 68 also associates a coordinate location with each set of CUV measurements. This can best be accomplished by including a GPS receiver in the TMU 68. Alternatively, the position of the TMU 68 can be supplied manually or the CUC 50 can triangulate the position by examining the relative signal strengths of the measured PCS base station 32 control channels. 
     The CUV procedure involves tuning a receiver to each POFS microwave channel, in turn, measuring the received power in that channel and retaining the measured data for uploading to the CUC 50. The CUV procedure also involves measuring the received power in each PCS control channel (base station 32 transmit). This information is similarly retained for uploading to the CUC 50. The Test Mobile Unit 68 can also upload the measured data real-time to the CUC 50 by accessing a voice channel from the PCS base station 32 and dialing directly into the CUC 50. Alternatively, the Test Mobile Unit 68 can store the measured data on a floppy disk, or other medium, for later uploading to the CUC 50. 
     In the preferred embodiment, the TMU 68 allows the field technician to select which POFS and PCS channels are included in the CUV. Licensee A does not require information on microwave paths that do not utilize transmit or receive frequencies in the 1850-1875 MHz or 1930-1955 MHz bands. Therefore, the TMU 68 can be programmed to measure only certain preset POFS channels. Similarly, the TMU 68 only needs to measure PCS channels that are used as control channels. The RF engineer may not want measured data on voice channels that might not be active at the time the measurements are taken. Therefore, the PCS channels measured by the TMU 68 can also be programmed. 
     When the CUC 50 receives the CUV measured data, the RF engineer can perform the measured data analysis (MDA). The CUC 50 compares, POFS channel by POFS channel, the values measured by the TMU 68 against the expected values stored in the Jeff Davis database entry. This process protects POFS stations against interference from PCS subscriber unit 36 transmit frequencies and protects against receiving interference at PCS subscriber units 36 on PCS base station 32 transmit frequencies (PCS subscriber unit 36 receive frequencies). The CUC 50 also compares, PCS control channel by PCS control channel, the values measured by the TMU 68 against the expected values stored in the Jeff Davis database entry. This process protects other PCS base stations 32 against interference from PCS subscriber units 36 in the Jeff Davis service area and protects against PCS subscriber units 36 in the Jeff Davis service area receiving interference from other PCS base stations 32. 
     The CUC 50 provides the RF engineer the opportunity to select the desired tolerance between expected values and CUV measured values. This tolerance is used by the CUC 50 to identify measured values that are more than the selected tolerance above or below the expected values. In this case, the RF engineer selects a tolerance of 6 dB. 
     In evaluating the measured data from the TMU 68, the CUC 50 retrieves the first set of CUV measurements and utilizes the associated coordinates to determine the closest grid point 130. The measured TMU 68 data is then compared with theoretical values stored in the Jeff Davis database entry for that grid point 130. 
     For each POFS channel, the CUC 50 retrieves the expected value for all cochannel POFS stations and selects the POFS station with the highest expected value. Because of the relatively large geographic separation of cochannel re-use by POFS stations and because of the highly directional nature of POFS transmissions, in the vast majority of cases, a single POFS station will have an expected signal strength far exceeding all other cochannel stations. In cases where the POFS station with the second highest expected value is within the selected tolerance of the station with the highest expected value, the CUC 50 reports the stations and the expected values to the RF engineer. In these cases, if measured values for each POFS station is critical, the field technician can replace the TMU&#39;s 68 omnidirectional antenna 70 with a highly directional antenna 71 and design a CUV measurement procedure that allows separate measurements to be taken on each POFS station. 
     At each grid point 130, the CUC 50 then compares the expected value of the POFS station, to the measured value obtained in the TMU 68 CUV procedure. If the measured value is within the selected tolerance of the expected value, the CUC 50 does not modify the ACL. If, however, the measured value is more than the selected tolerance higher than the expected value, which might occur, for example, where a line-of-sight condition exists between the PCS base station 32 and the POFS station and a Hata propagation prediction method was used for the theoretical analysis, the CUC 50 compares the measured value to the desired Jeff Davis signal strength at that grid point 130. If the measured POFS value degrades the C/I ratio below the selected cochannel interference criterion, and the grid point is designated as critical 137, the CUC 50 removes all cochannel frequencies from the Jeff Davis ACL. Adjacent channels are similarly removed from the Jeff Davis ACL if the measured POFS value degrades the C/I ratio below the selected adjacent channel interference criterion. 
     In this example, the desired Jeff Davis signal strength at critical grid point 137 (row 5, column 6) is -89.4 dBm and the undesired WXX819 (1935 MHz) value is -104.3 dBm. In this example, the CUV measured value for this grid point is -98.1 dBm. In this case, the selected 6 dB tolerance is not met nor is the 12 dB cochannel C/I ratio met. Since the MDA has determined that the use of frequencies cochannel to WXX819 at Jeff Davis would result in received interference at a critical grid point 137, the CUC 50 removes channels 1, 10, 19, 28, 37 and 46 from the Jeff Davis ACL. In this case, both the 0 dB and the -10 dB adjacent channel interference criteria are met. 
     The measured CUV values at each grid point 130 are stored in the Jeff Davis database entry. 
     The CUC 50 also examines the paired POFS frequency to see if the PCS system might be causing interference to the POFS receive channel. The advantage of the FAST system 30 is that by measuring the power in the POFS transmitted channel, it can determine if the PCS system might interfere with the paired POFS channel received at that location. This is done by calculating the actual propagation loss between the PCS base station 32 and the POFS receiver based on the measured power of the POFS signal. Based upon this actual propagation loss the CUC 50 adjusts the subscriber unit 36 undesired power at the POFS station. In this case, the measured propagation loss between WXX819 and grid point 130 (row 5, column 6) is 6.2 dB less than predicted. Therefore, the CUC 50 calculates the expected signal strength at WXX819 from a subscriber unit 36 at this grid point 130 and adjusts the Hata propagation loss by 6.2 dB. In this example, the adjusted signal strength from grid point 130 (row 5, column 6) is -103.5 dBm and is below the -102.6 dBm signal from the worst case Jeff Davis grid point 137 (row 3, column 4). This calculation is made even if the Jeff Davis ACL does not contain any frequencies cochannel or adjacent channel to WXX819 so that the &#34;worst case&#34; grid point 137 data can be updated if necessary. In this case, no further adjustments to the Jeff Davis ACL or the worst case data is required as a result of this CUV measurement. 
     If the measured POFS signal strength is more than the selected tolerance below the expected value, the CUC 50 determines if channels could be added to the ACL without causing interference nor receiving interference from the POFS base station. This might occur, for example, when a significant obstruction blocks the direct path from the PCS base station 32 to the POFS station. The CUC 50 reports possible channel additions to the system operator for further verification prior to adding the channels to the ACL. 
     After the interference analyses have been completed, the RF engineer examines the ACL to see if sufficient interference-free channels are available to meet the projected demand. If insufficient channels are available at the new site with the selected parameters, the RF engineer would examine the PCS and POFS facilities that block channel use at the new site and revisit the base station 32 parameter selection. For example, changing from an omnidirectional antenna 70 to a directional antenna 71, a power or height reduction or site move might remove potential interference between the proposed facility and other PCS base stations 32 or POFS facilities, freeing up additional PCS channels at the new site. If necessary, the RF engineer might decide that a POFS facility needs to be relocated in frequency and negotiations with the POFS licensee would commence. 
     In this case, after the interference analyses, the ACL contains the following channels: 
     From Group 1A: 55, 64, 73, 82, 91, 100, 109, 118 
     From Group 1B: 103, 112, 121 
     From Group 1C: 61, 70, 79, 88, 97, 106, 115, 124 
     which is sufficient to meet the projected demand at the new site. 
     At this point the site design phase is completed and the RF engineer prints out the parameters of the proposed base station 32 for the site acquisition personnel. Once the Jeff Davis site has been acquired and the installation process has been completed, the base station 32 is ready to go into operation. When the base station 32 is powered on, it performs the CUV and uploads to the CUC 50, the received power in each POFS microwave channel. When the CUC 50 receives the CUV measured data, the RF engineer can perform the MDA. Whereas the TMU 68 CUV measured data protected against interference between PCS subscriber units 36 and POFS stations, the base station CUV measured data protects against interference between PCS base stations 32 and POFS stations. 
     In performing the MDA, the CUC 50 compares, POFS channel by POFS channel, the measured values against the expected values stored in the Jeff Davis database entry. This procedure protects POFS stations against interference from Jeff Davis transmit frequencies and protects against receiving interference at Jeff Davis on PCS subscriber unit transmit frequencies (PCS base station receive frequencies). The MDA process for base station CUV data is very similar to the MDA process described above for TMU CUV data. The base station MDA process is somewhat simpler, however, in that interference evaluations are made at PCS base stations 32 and POFS stations, and do not need to be made at each grid point 130. 
     In the preferred environment, the PCS base station CUV procedure can optionally include measured data on each PCS control channel (base station transmit). In an FDD system, this information does not directly relate to any interference condition; i.e., base station transmit frequencies cannot interfere with base station transmit frequencies. This data can be used, however, to draw general conclusions about potential intra-system interference, particularly for PCS base stations 32 with low antenna heights. If a measured value far exceeds an expected value, it is likely that subscriber units 36 served by the base station 32 will receive interference from and/or cause interference to the undesired base station 32. Measured values far below the expected values indicate the presence of severe path obstructions. Therefore, this data can also be helpful in determining the existence of line-of-sight paths for microwave interconnects. 
     When all the interference analyses have been completed and the measured data evaluated, only interference-free channels remain in the ACL. The CUC 50 sends the ACL to the new base station 32 which is now ready to begin operation on the channels included in the ACL. The CUC downloads the ACL to the PCS base station and stores the data for future retrieval. These four mechanisms (i.e., intersystem interference analysis, intrasystem interference analysis, channel use verification procedure (CUV), and measured data analysis (MDA)), described above, are performed when a new PCS base station is brought on-line, or modified, upon the request of the system operator or at specified intervals (i.e., every night or as often as necessary to maintain interference-free PCS and POFS communications), but not performed upon each system access by a subscriber unit. The FAST system 30 provides one additional feature in the call set-up procedure to minimize intersystem and intrasystem interference. 
     In the preferred embodiment of a PCS system, each PCS base station 32 transmits certain overhead information on its control channel. Included in this information is a base station 32 identification and the base station&#39;s 32 ACL. Alternatively, to cut down on system overhead, the ACL transmitted on the control channel could be limited to available voice channels, i.e. ACL voice channels not currently in use at the base station. When a subscriber places or receives a call, the subscriber unit 36 and the PCS base station 32 enter the call setup procedure. Included in this procedure is the Channel Selection Process (CSP) 350 which provides an additional measure of protection against intrasystem and intersystem interference. 
     When a subscriber places or receives a call, the subscriber unit 36 first measures the power on every channel in the ACL (base station transmit, subscriber unit receive). The subscriber unit 36 then transmits to the base station 32 on the control channel (base station receive side of channel pair), a request for a voice channel. Also transmitted to the base station 32 are the measurements taken by the subscriber unit 36 on each of the channels in the ACL. 
     In the preferred embodiment, PCS base stations 32 continually (e.g., every second) measure signal strengths on every voice channel in the ACL (base station 32 receive, subscriber unit 36 transmit). The voice channels in the ACL are then ranked by ascending signal strength. Therefore, the channel ranked number 1 currently has the least amount of measurable power in the channel. When the base station 32 receives the subscriber unit&#39;s 36 measured data, it ranks the subscriber unit&#39;s 36 channels according to the same criteria. For each channel, the base station 32 adds the subscriber unit rank to the base station rank and selects the channel with the lowest total rank. This is the channel selected for this particular call. The base station 32 then sends a message to the subscriber unit 36 on the control channel, to utilize the selected channel for this call. 
     This CSP process minimizes intrasystem and intersystem interference by selecting the best available channel at the moment every call is initiated. Other mechanisms, such as continual monitoring of the C/I ratio by both base station 32 and subscriber unit 36, are utilized by the PCS system to insure high quality communications throughout the duration of the call. 
     Using the foregoing embodiments, methods and processes, the FAST system 30 allows PCS systems to maximize system capacity and minimize interference, thereby maximizing efficient use of scarce radio spectrum, by making channel assignments subject to noninterference between intersystem and intrasystem users. It will be clear to those in the art that many and varied modifications can be made to the preferred embodiment shown and described such as noninterference based systems adapted to other network architectures, multiple access schemes, and other known advances in PCS technology. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the appended claims.