Abstract:
An article of manufacture includes an oxygen scavenger and a zeolite. The article can be in the form of e.g. a film or sealing compound. A package can be made from the article for containing an oxygen-sensitive article such as food. The zeolite reduces migration of odor causing by-products of the oxygen scavenging process. A method of making an article of manufacture having reduced migration of byproducts of an oxygen scavenging reaction includes providing an article including an oxygen scavenger and a zeolite; and exposing the article to actinic radiation.

Description:
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 08/612,360, filed Mar. 7, 1996 now abandoned. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention generally relates to compositions, articles and methods for scavenging by-products of an oxygen scavenging reaction. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     It is well known that limiting the exposure of an oxygen-sensitive product to oxygen maintains and enhances the quality and &#34;shelf-life&#34; of the product. In the food packaging industry, several means for regulating oxygen exposure have already been developed. 
     These means include modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) for modifying the interior environment of a package; gas flushing; vacuum packaging; vacuum packaging combined with the use of oxygen barrier packaging materials; etc. Oxygen barrier films and laminates reduce or retard oxygen permeation from the outside environment into the package interior. 
     Another method currently being used is through &#34;active packaging.&#34; The inclusion of oxygen scavengers within the cavity or interior of the package is one form of active packaging. Typically, such oxygen scavengers are in the form of sachets which contain a composition which scavenges the oxygen through chemical reactions. One type of sachet contains iron compositions which oxidize. Another type of sachet contains unsaturated fatty acid salts on a particulate adsorbent. Yet another type of sachet contains metal/polyamide complex. 
     One disadvantage of sachets is the need for additional packaging operations to add the sachet to each package. A further disadvantage arising from the use of some sachets is that certain atmospheric conditions (e.g., high humidity, low CO 2  level) in the package are required in order for scavenging to occur at an adequate rate. 
     Another means for limiting the exposure to oxygen involves incorporating an oxygen scavenger into the packaging structure itself. This achieves a more uniform scavenging effect throughout the package. This may be specially important where there is restricted air circulation inside the package. In addition, such incorporation can provide a means of intercepting and scavenging oxygen as it passes through the walls of the package (herein referred to as an &#34;active oxygen barrier&#34;), thereby maintaining the lowest possible oxygen level throughout the package. 
     One attempt to prepare an oxygen-scavenging wall involves the incorporation of inorganic powders and/or salts. However, incorporation of these powders and/or salts causes degradation of the wall&#39;s transparency and mechanical properties such as tear strength. In addition, these compounds can lead to processing difficulties, especially in the fabrication of thin films, or thin layers within a film structure. Even further, the scavenging rates for walls containing these compounds are unsuitable for some commercial oxygen-scavenging applications, e.g. such as those in which sachets are employed. 
     Other efforts have been directed to incorporating a metal catalyst-polyamide oxygen scavenging system into the package wall. However, this system does not exhibit oxygen scavenging at a commercially feasible rate. 
     Oxygen scavengers suitable for commercial use in films of the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,350,622, and a method of initiating oxygen scavenging generally is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,211,875. Both applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. According to U.S. Pat. No. 5,350,622, oxygen scavengers are made of an ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon and transition metal catalyst. The preferred ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon may be either substituted or unsubstituted. As defined herein, an unsubstituted ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon is any compound which possesses at least one aliphatic carbon-carbon double bond and comprises 100% by weight carbon and hydrogen. A substituted ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon is defined herein as an ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon which possesses at least one aliphatic carbon-carbon double bond and comprises about 50%-99% by weight carbon and hydrogen. Preferable substituted or unsubstituted ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbons are those having two or more ethylenically unsaturated groups per molecule. More preferably, it is a polymeric compound having three or more ethylenically unsaturated groups and a molecular weight equal to or greater than 1,000 weight average molecular weight. 
     Preferred examples of unsubstituted ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, diene polymers such as polyisoprene, (e.g., trans-polyisoprene) and copolymers thereof, cis and trans 1,4-polybutadiene, 1,2-polybutadienes, (which are defined as those polybutadienes possessing greater than or equal to 50% 1,2 microstructure), and copolymers thereof, such as styrene-butadiene copolymer. Such hydrocarbons also include polymeric compounds such as polypentenamer, pplyoctenamer, and other polymers prepared by cyclic olefin metathesis; diene oligomers such as squalene; and polymers or copolymers with unsaturation derived from dicyclopentadiene, norbornadiene, 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, 5-vinyl-2-norbornene, 4-vinylcyclohexene, or other monomers containing more than one carbon-carbon double bond (conjugated or non-conjugated). 
     Preferred substituted ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, those with oxygen-containing moieties, such as esters, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, ethers, ketones, alcohols, peroxides, and/or hydroperoxides. Specific examples of such hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, condensation polymers such as polyesters derived from monomers containing carbon-carbon double bonds, and unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic, ricinoleic, dehydrated ricinoleic, and linoleic acids and derivatives thereof, e.g. esters. Such hydrocarbons also include polymers or copolymers derived from (meth)allyl (meth)acrylates. Suitable oxygen scavenging polymers can be made by trans-esterification. Such polymers are disclosed in WO 95/02616, incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. The composition used may also comprise a mixture of two or more of the substituted or unsubstituted ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbons described above. While a weight average molecular weight of 1,000 or more is preferred, an ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon having a lower molecular weight is usable, provided it is blended with a film-forming polymer or blend of polymers. 
     As will also be evident, ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbons which are appropriate for forming solid transparent layers at room temperature are preferred for scavenging oxygen in the packaging articles described above. For most applications where transparency is necessary, a layer which allows at least 50% transmission of visible light is preferred. 
     When making transparent oxygen-scavenging layers according to this invention, 1,2-polybutadiene is especially preferred for use at room temperature. For instance, 1,2-polybutadiene can exhibit transparency, mechanical properties and processing characteristics similar to those of polyethylene. In addition, this polymer is found to retain its transparency and mechanical integrity even after most or all of its oxygen capacity has been consumed, and even when little or no diluent resin is present. Even further, 1,2-polybutadiene exhibits a relatively high oxygen capacity and, once it has begun to scavenge, it exhibits a relatively high scavenging rate as well. 
     When oxygen scavenging at low temperatures is desired, 1,4-polybutadiene, and copolymers of styrene with butadiene, and styrene with isoprene are especially preferred. Such compositions are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,497 issued to Speer et al. on May 10, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. In many cases it may be desirable to blend the aforementioned polymers with a polymer or copolymer of ethylene. 
     Other oxygen scavengers which can be used in connection with this invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,075,362 (Hofeldt et al.), 5,106,886 (Hofeldt et al.), 5,204,389 (Hofeldt et al.), and 5,227,411 (Hofeldt et al.), all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. These oxygen scavengers include ascorbates or isoascorbates or mixtures thereof with each other or with a sulfite, often sodium sulfite. 
     Still other oxygen scavengers which can be used in connection with this invention are disclosed in PCT patent publications WO 91/17044 (Zapata Industries) and WO94/09084 (Aquanautics Corporation), both incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. These oxygen scavengers include an ascorbate with a transition metal catalyst, the catalyst being a simple metal or salt or a compound, complex or chelate of the transition metal; or a transition metal complex or chelate of a polycarboxylic or salicylic acid or polyamine, optionally with a reducing agent such as ascorbate, where the transition metal complex or chelate acts primarily as an oxygen scavenging composition. 
     Yet other oxygen scavengers which can be used in connection with this invention are disclosed in PCT patent publication WO 94/12590 (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. These oxygen scavengers include at least one reducible organic compound which is reduced under predetermined conditions, the reduced form of the compound being oxidizable by molecular oxygen, wherein the reduction and/or subsequent oxidation of the organic compound occurs independent of the presence of a transition metal catalyst. The reducible organic compound is preferably a quinone, a photoreducible dye, or a carbonyl compound which has absorbence in the UV spectrum. 
     Sulfites, alkali metal salts of sulphites, and tannins, are also contemplated as oxygen scavenging compounds. 
     As indicated above, the ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon is combined with a transition metal catalyst. While not being bound by any particular theory, the inventors observe that suitable metal catalysts are those which can readily interconvert between at least two oxidation states. See Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J. K.; &#34;Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic Compounds&#34; Academic Press, New York 1981. 
     Preferably, the catalyst is in the form of a transition metal salt, with the metal selected from the first, second or third transition series of the Periodic Table. Suitable metals include, but are not limited to, manganese II or III, iron II or III, cobalt II or III, nickel II or III, copper I or II, rhodium II, III or IV, and ruthenium II or III. The oxidation state of the metal when introduced is not necessarily that of the active form. The metal is preferably iron, nickel or copper, more preferably manganese and most preferably cobalt. Suitable counterions for the metal include, but are not limited to, chloride, acetate, stearate, palmitate, caprylate, linoleate, tallate, 2-ethylhexanoate, neodecanoate, oleate or naphthenate. Particularly preferable salts include cobalt (II) 2-ethylhexanoate and cobalt (II) neodecanoate. The metal salt may also be an ionomer, in which case a polymeric counterion is employed. Such ionomers are well known in the art. 
     The ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon and transition metal catalyst can be further combined with one or more polymeric diluents, such as thermoplastic polymers which are typically used to form film layers in plastic packaging articles. In the manufacture of certain packaging articles well known thermosets can also be used as the polymeric diluent. 
     Polymers which can be used as the diluent include, but are not limited to, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene, low or very low density polyethylene, ultra-low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene, and ethylene copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate, ethylene-alkyl (meth)acrylates, ethylene-(meth)acrylic acid and ethylene-(meth)acrylic acid ionomers. Blends of different diluents may also be used. However, as indicated above, the selection of the polymeric diluent largely depends on the article to be manufactured and the end use. Such selection factors are well known in the art. 
     Further additives can also be included in the composition to impart properties desired for the particular article being manufactured. Such additives include, but are not necessarily limited to, fillers, pigments, dyestuffs, antioxidants, stabilizers, processing aids, plasticizers, fire retardants, anti-fog agents, etc. 
     The mixing of the components listed above is preferably accomplished by melt-blending at a temperature in the range of 50° C. to 300° C. However alternatives such as the use of a solvent followed by evaporation may also be employed. The blending may immediately precede the formation of the finished article or preform or precede the formation of a feedstock or masterbatch for later use in the production of finished packaging articles. 
     Although these technologies offers great potential in packaging applications, it has been found that oxygen scavenging structures can sometimes generate reaction byproducts which can affect the taste and smell of the packaged material (i.e. organoleptic properties), or raise food regulatory issues. These by-products can include acids, aldehydes and ketones. 
     The inventors have found that this problem can be minimized by the use of zeolites (such as organophilic zeolites) which absorb odor-causing reaction byproducts. The zeolites can be incorporated into one or more layers of a multilayer film or container which includes an oxygen scavenging layer. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the present invention is applicable to any oxygen scavenging system that produces by-products such as acids, aldehydes, and ketones. 
     DEFINITIONS 
     &#34;Film&#34; (F) herein means a film, laminate, sheet, web, coating, or the like which can be used to package a product. 
     &#34;Zeolite&#34; herein refers to molecular sieves, including aluminophosphates and aluminosilicates with a framework structure enclosing cavities occupied by large ions and/or water molecules, both of which have considerable freedom of movement permitting ion exchange and reversible dehydration. The framework may also contain other cations such as Mn, Ti, Co, and Fe. An example of such materials are the titanosilicate and titanoaluminosilicate molecular sieves. Unlike amorphous materials, these crystalline structures contain voids of discrete size. A typical naturally occurring zeolite is the mineral faujasite with formula 
     
         Na.sub.13 Ca.sub.11 Mg.sub.9 K.sub.2 Al.sub.55 Si.sub.137 O.sub.384.235H.sub.2 O. 
    
     Ammonium and alkylammonium cations may be incorporated in synthetic zeolites, e.g. NH 4 , CH 3  NH 3 , (CH 3 ) 2  NH 2 , (CH 3 ) 3  NH, and (CH 3 ) 4  N. Some zeolites have frameworks of linked truncated octahedra (Beta-cages) characteristic of the structure of sodalite. Numerous synthetic zeolites are available. 
     &#34;Oxygen scavenger&#34; (OS) and the like herein means a composition, article or the like which consumes, depletes or reacts with oxygen from a given environment. 
     &#34;Actinic radiation&#34; and the like herein means any form of radiation, such as ultraviolet radiation or electron beam irradiation, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,211,875 (Speer et al.). 
     &#34;Polymer&#34; and the like herein means a homopolymer, but also copolymers thereof, including bispolymers, terpolymers, etc. 
     &#34;Ethylene alpha-olefin copolymer&#34; and the like herein means such heterogeneous materials as linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), linear medium density polyethylene (LMDPE) and very low and ultra low density polyethylene (VLDPE and ULDPE); and homogeneous polymers such as metallocene catalyzed polymers such as EXACT (TM) materials supplied by Exxon, and TAFMER (TM) materials supplied by Mitsui Petrochemical Corporation. These materials generally include copolymers of ethylene with one or more comonomers selected from C 4  to C 10  alpha-olefins such as butene-1 (i.e., 1-butene), hexene-1, octene-1, etc. in which the molecules of the copolymers comprise long chains with relatively few side chain branches or cross-linked structures. This molecular structure is to be contrasted with conventional low or medium density polyethylenes which are more highly branched than their respective counterparts. Other ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymers, such as the long chain branched homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymers available from the Dow Chemical Company, known as AFFINITY (TM) resins, are also included as another type of ethylene alpha-olefin copolymer useful in the present invention. 
     As used herein, the term &#34;polyamide&#34; refers to polymers having amide linkages along the molecular chain, and preferably to synthetic polyamides such as nylons. Furthermore, such term encompasses both polymers comprising repeating units derived from monomers, such as caprolactam, which polymerize to form a polyamide, as well as copolymers of two or more amide monomers, including nylon terpolymers, also referred to generally as &#34;copolyamides&#34; herein. 
     &#34;LLDPE&#34; herein means linear low density polyethylene, which is an ethylene alpha olefin copolymer. 
     &#34;EVOH&#34; herein means ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer. 
     &#34;EVA&#34; herein means ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     In one aspect of the invention, an article of manufacture comprises an oxygen scavenger and a zeolite. 
     In a second aspect of the invention, a package comprises an article and a container into which the oxygen sensitive article is disposed, the container including a component comprising an oxygen scavenger and a zeolite. 
     In a third aspect of the invention, a method of making an article of manufacture having reduced migration of by-products of an oxygen scavenging reaction comprises providing an article comprising an oxygen scavenger and a zeolite and exposing the article to actinic radiation. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     The invention may be further understood with reference to the drawings wherein FIGS. 1 through 5 are schematic cross-sections of various embodiments of a film of the present invention. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The invention can be used to make various articles of manufacture, compounds, compositions of matter, coatings, etc. Two preferred forms are sealing compounds, and flexible films, both useful in packaging of food and non-food products. 
     It is known to use sealing compounds in the manufacture of gaskets for the rigid container market. Large, wide diameter gaskets are typically made using a liquid plastisol. This plastisol is a highly viscous, liquid suspension of polymer particles in a plasticizer. In the manufacture of metal or plastic caps, lids, and the like, this liquid plastisol is applied to the annulus of a container such as a jar, and the container with the applied plastisol is &#34;fluxed&#34; in an oven to solidify the plastisol into a gasket. The result is a gasket formed around the annulus of the container. 
     Smaller gaskets are typically made for use in beer crowns in bottles. A polymer melt is applied by cold molding to the entire inner surface of the crown. Both PVC and other polymers are used in this application. 
     Discs for plastic caps are typically made by taking a ribbon of gasket material and making discs, and inserting the discs into the plastic cap. 
     In all of these applications, the use of an oxygen scavenger and zeolite beneficially provides removal of oxygen from the interior environment of the container, while controlling undesirable by-products of the oxygen scavenging reaction. 
     Thus, a gasket includes a polymeric composition, an oxygen scavenger, and a zeolite. The gasket adheres a metal or plastic lid or closure to a rigid or semi-rigid container, thus sealing the lid or closure to the container. 
     Referring to FIG. 1, a multilayer film 10 is shown, having layer 12 and layer 14. 
     FIG. 2 shows a multilayer film with layers 12, 14, and 16. Layers 12, 14, and 16 are preferably polymeric. 
     Layer 12 comprises a zeolite. Preferred materials are the molecular sieves of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,795,482 (Gioffre et al.), incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Also useful in the present invention are zeolites supplied by the Davison division of W. R. Grace &amp; Co.-Conn. Preferred particle sizes for zeolites used in the present invention are between 0.1 and 10 micrometers, and more preferably between 0.5 and 3 micrometers. 
     Layer 14 comprises an oxygen scavenger, preferably a polymeric oxygen scavenger, more preferably one of the materials described above. 
     Layer 16 comprises an oxygen barrier material, such as ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH), Saran (vinylidene chloride copolymer), polyester, polyamide, metal, silica coating, etc. 
     FIG. 3 shows a laminated film in which a three layer film is adhered to a second film. Layers 32, 34, and 36 correspond functionally and compositionally to 12, 14, and 16 respectively of FIG. 2, and layer 38 is an intermediate layer which can comprise any polymeric material such as polyolefin, more preferably ethylenic polymers such as ethylene/alpha-olefin and ethylene/unsaturated ester copolymers, more preferably ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer. Layer 31 represents a conventional adhesive such as polyurethane adhesive. Comparative 2 in Table 6 exemplifies the laminated film of FIG. 3. 
     FIG. 4 shows a laminated film in which a four layer film is adhered to a second film. Layers 42, 44, 46 and 48 correspond functionally and compositionally to layers 32, 34, 36 and 38 respectively of FIG. 3. Layer 49 is an innermost heat sealable layer which can comprise any polymeric material such as polyolefin, more preferably ethylenic polymers such as ethylene/alpha-olefin and ethyene/unsaturated ester copolymers, such as ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer. Layer 46 provides oxygen barrier to the film structure, and adheres to layer 48 by means of conventional adhesive 41. This adhesive corresponds to layer 31 of FIG. 3, and is shown simply as a thickened line. Examples 2 and 3 of Table 6 exemplify the laminated film of FIG. 4. 
     FIG. 5 shows a nine layer film. Example 1 and Comparative 1 in Table 2 exemplify the film of FIG. 5. 
     Layer 57 is an abuse-resistant layer useful as an outermost layer of a film when used in a packaging application. 
     Layers 54 and 56 correspond functionally and compositionally to layers 14 and 16 respectively of FIGS. 2 and 3, as well as to layers 44 and 46 respectively of FIG. 4. 
     Layers 52, 53, 58 and 59 comprise an adhesive. The adhesive is preferably polymeric, more preferably acid or acid anhydride-grafted polyolefins. In addition, these layers can comprise a zeolite. 
     Layer 55 comprises a heat resistant material. This can be any suitable polymeric material, preferably an amide polymer such as nylon 6, or a polyester such as polyethylene terephthalate. 
     Layer 51 comprises a heat sealable material. This can be any suitable polymeric material, preferably an olefinic polymer such as an ethylenic polymer, more preferably an ethylene alpha olefin copolymer. In addition, layer 51 can further comprise a zeolite. 
     The invention may be further understood by reference to the examples shown below. Table 1 identifies the materials used in the examples. The remaining tables describe the films made with these materials, and organoleptic or migration data resulting from testing some of these films. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________MA-TER-IAL   TRADENAME    SOURCE   DESCRIPTION______________________________________PE.sub.1 Dowlex ™ 3010              Dow      LLDPE, an ethylene/1-                       octene copolymer with a                       density of 0.921 gm/ccPE.sub.2 Dowlex ™ 2244 A              Dow      LLDPE, an ethylene/1-                       octene copolymer with a                       density of 0.916 gm/ccPE.sub.3 Poly-eth 1017              Chevron  low density polyethylenePE.sub.4 AC-9A        Allied   polyethylene powderAB.sub.1 10,075 ACP Sy-              Tecknor  89.8% low density polyeth- loid ™ antiblock              Color    ylene (Exxon LD 203.48) + concentrate           10% synthetic amorphous                       silica (Syloid ™ 74X6500                       from Davison Chemical) +                       0.2% calcium stearatePP.sub.1 Escorene     Exxon    polypropylene PP292.E1Z.sub.1 10414-12 zeolite              Cotortech                       masterbatch of 80% LLDPE concentrate           and 20% UOP Abscents ®                       3000 zeoliteZ.sub.2 10417-12 zeolite              Colortech                       masterbatch of 80% LLDPE concentrate           and 20% UOP Abscents ®                       2000 zeoliteZ.sub.3 USY zeolite  Grace    zeolite              DavisonZ.sub.4 ZSM-5 zeolite              Grace    zeolite              DavisonZ.sub.5 ZN-1         Grace    zeolite              Davison X5297H       Engelhard                       titanium silicate zeoliteAD.sub.1 Plexar ™ 107              Quantum  anhydride-grafted EVAAD.sub.2 Adcote 530 and              Morton   mixture of silane, isocy- Coreactant 9L23              Inter-   anate, glycol, and alkyl              national acetatePA.sub.1 Ultramid ™ KR              BASF     nylon 6 (polycaprolactam) 4407-FOB.sub.1 LC-H101BD    Evalca   ethylene/vinyl alcohol co-                       polymer with 38 mole %                       ethyleneOS.sub.1 RB-830       JSR      1,2-polybutadieneOS.sub.2 VISTALON ™              Exxon    ethylene-propylene-diene 3708                  terpolymerOS.sub.3 VECTOR ™ 8508-              Dexco    styrene/butadiene copoly- D                     mer with 30% by weight of                       the styrene comonomer,                       and 70% by weight of the                       butadiene comonomerEV.sub.1 MU-763       Quantum  ethylene/vinyl acetate co-                       polymerEV.sub.2 PE 1375      Rexene   ethylene/vinyl acetate co-                       polymer with 3.6 wt. % vinyl                       acetate comonomerEV.sub.3 LD-318.92    Exxon    ethylene/vinyl acetate co-                       polymer with 9 wt. % vinyl                       acetate comonomerEB.sub.1 Lotryl 30BA02              Atochem  ethylene/butyl acrylate co-                       polymer with 30 wt. % butyl                       acrylate copolymerPI.sub.1 benzophenone Sartomer photoinitiatorPI.sub.2 benzoylbiphenyl              --       photoinitiatorTC.sub.1 TENCEM ™ 170              OMG      cobalt neodecanoate, a                       transition metal catalystTC.sub.2 cobalt oleate              Shepherd a transition metal catalystF.sub.1 50m-44 Mylar12 ™              DuPont   Saran-coated polyethylene                       terephthalate film______________________________________ 
    
     Certain materials were blended together for some of the film structures, and these blends are identified as follows: 
     PEB 1  =90% PE 1  +10% AB 1 . 
     PEB 2  =90% PE 1  +10% PEB 3 . 
     PEB 3  =80% PE 3  +20% PE 4 . 
     PPB 1  =60% PP 1  +40% EB 1 . 
     PPB 2  =40% PP 1  +60% EB 1 . 
     OSB 1  =76.5% OS 1  +13.5% OS 2  +9.2% EV 1  +0.5% PI 1  +0.3% TC 1 . 
     OSB 2  =50% OS 3  +40% PE 3  +8.54% EV 1  +0.90% TC 1  +0.50% PI 1  +0.05% calcium oxide+0.01% antioxidant (Irganox 1076). 
     OSB 3  =60% OS 3  +38.83% EV 3  +1.06% TC 2  +0.10% PI 2  +0.01% antioxidant (Irganox 1076). 
     OSB 4  =40% OS 3  +58.83% EV 3  +1.06% TC 2  +0.10% PI 2  +0.01% antioxidant (Irganox 1076). 
     ZB 1  =87% PE 1  +10% AB 1  +3% Z 1 . 
     ZB 2  =90% PE 2  +10% Z 1 . 
     ZB 3  =90% PE 2  +10% Z 2 . 
     ZB 4  =90% PE 2  +6% PE 3  +2% PE 4  +1% Z 3  +1% Z 4   
     ZB 5  =80% PE 2  +20% Z 2 . 
     ZB 6  =80% PE 3  +20% Z 2 . 
     In Table 2, a nine-layer film structure in accordance with the invention, and a comparative film, are disclosed. These were each made by coextrusion of the layers. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________EXAMPLE   STRUCTURE______________________________________1         PEB.sub.1 /AD.sub.4 /OB.sub.1 /AD.sub.4 /OSB.sub.1 /AD.sub.4     /PA.sub.1 /AD.sub.4 /ZB.sub.2COMP. 1   PEB.sub.1 /AD.sub.4 /OB.sub.1 /AD.sub.4 /OSB.sub.1 /AD.sub.4     /PA.sub.1 /AD.sub.4 /PEB.sub.1______________________________________ 
    
     The target (and approximate actual) gauge (in mils) of each layer of the nine-layer film is shown below. Layer 9 would preferably form the food or product contact layer in a typical packaging application. 
     
         ______________________________________layer layer  layer   layer                     layer layer                                layer layer                                           layer1     2      3       4    5     6    7     8    9______________________________________1.35  0.20   0.50    0.20 0.50  0.20 1.00  0.20 1.35______________________________________ 
    
     The films of Example 1 and Comparative 1 were subjected to food law migration tests to evaluate whether zeolites could reduce the concentration of extractables. The films were triggered by ultraviolet light according to the procedure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,211,875. The films were converted into 280 cm 2  pouches and the pouches were filled with a food simulant. The filled pouches were then retorted at 100° C. for 30 minutes and stored at 50° C. for 10 days. The food simulant was decanted from the pouches and analyzed. Table 3 shows a list of potential extractables. Table 4 shows the concentration of the same extractables, where the films were extracted with 8% ethanol solution as the food simulant. Table 5 shows the concentration of the same extractables, where the films were extracted with water as the food simulant. In both Tables 4 and 5, the concentration of each extractable is in units of nanograms/milliliter. Zeolites can reduce the concentration of certain extractables which could cause regulatory issues. 
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________ABBREVIATION    DESCRIPTION______________________________________E.sub.1         benzophenoneE.sub.2         triphenyl phosphine oxideE.sub.3         Permanax ™ WSP (antioxidant)*E.sub.4         dilauryl thiodipropionateE.sub.5         methyl formateE.sub.6         ethyl formateE.sub.7         methanolE.sub.8         formaldehydeE.sub.9         acetaldehyde.sub. E.sub.10  acetone.sub. E.sub.11  acrolein (2-propenal).sub. E.sub.12  propanal______________________________________ *E3 = 2,2&#39;-methylene bis (4ethyl-6-(1-methylcyclohexyl)phenol). 
    
     
                                           TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________EX.  E.sub.1   E.sub.2       E.sub.3          E.sub.4             E.sub.5                 E.sub.6                    E.sub.7                       E.sub.8                           E.sub.9                              E.sub.10__________________________________________________________________________1     21   21  &lt;10          &lt;5 &lt;600                 &lt;300                    3,310                       1,400                           6,700                              100COMP. 1&lt;20   40  &lt;10          &lt;5 &lt;600                 &lt;300                    2,960                       1,600                           7,800                               80__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     
                                           TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________EX.  E.sub.1   E.sub.2       E.sub.3          E.sub.4             E.sub.5                 E.sub.6                    E.sub.7                       E.sub.8                           E.sub.9                              E.sub.10__________________________________________________________________________1    22 13  &lt;10          &lt;5 &lt;600                 &lt;300                    &lt;600                       320 780                              50COMP. 121 16  &lt;10          &lt;5 &lt;600                 &lt;300                    &lt;600                       310 730                              50__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     In Table 6, two five-layer laminate structures in accordance with the invention, and one comparative four-layer laminate structure, are disclosed. The two five-layer structures were each made by laminating a coextruded four-layer film, using a conventional adhesive, to a second film (=layer 5). The comparative structure was made by laminating a coextruded three-layer film, using a conventional adhesive, to a second film (=layer 4). 
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________EXAMPLE     STRUCTURE______________________________________2           PE.sub.2 /ZB.sub.2 /OSB.sub.2 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.13           PE.sub.2 /ZB.sub.3 /OSB.sub.2 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1COMP. 2     PE.sub.2 /OSB.sub.2 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1______________________________________ 
    
     The target (and approximate actual) gauge (in mils) of each layer of the laminate structures of the invention was: 
     
         ______________________________________layer 1  layer 2  layer 3  layer 4                           adhesive                                   layer 5______________________________________0.20   0.20     0.50     1.00   (minimal)                                   0.50______________________________________ 
    
     The target (and approximate actual) gauge (in mils) of each layer of the comparative laminate structures was: 
     
         ______________________________________layer 1  layer 2 layer 3    adhesive                              layer 4______________________________________0.40     0.51    1.04       (minimal)                              0.50______________________________________ 
    
     The film of Examples 2 and 3 were subjected to food law migration tests to evaluate whether zeolites could remove oxidation byproducts. Their efficacy was compared with Comparative 2. The list of extractables can be found in Table 3. The test results from the extraction of the films with Miglyol 812 (available from Huls America), a fatty food simulant, are summarized in Table 7. Zeolites can reduce the concentration of certain extractables which could cause regulatory issues. 
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________Migrant(ppb)   COMP. 2      EX. 2     EX. 3______________________________________E.sub.9 &lt;Q.L.        &lt;Q.L.     &lt;Q.L.E.sub.10   &lt;Q.L.        &lt;Q.L.     &lt;Q.L.E.sub.11   &lt;D.L.        &lt;D.L.     &lt;D.L.E.sub.1 980          1000 +/- 5                          875 +/- 23E.sub.8 &lt;D.L.        &lt;D.L.     &lt;D.L.E.sub.12   &lt;D.L.        &lt;D.L.     &lt;D.L.______________________________________ D.L. = detection limit = 50 parts per billion (food equivalent). Q.L. = quantifiable limit = 150 parts per billion (food equivalent). 
    
     In Table 8, three five-layer laminate structures in accordance with the invention, and one comparative five-layer laminate structure, are disclosed. The five-layer structures were each made by laminating a coextruded four-layer film, using a conventional adhesive, to a second film (=layer 5). 
     
                       TABLE 8______________________________________EXAMPLE     STRUCTURE______________________________________4           PE.sub.2 /ZB.sub.2 /OSB.sub.3 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.15           PE.sub.2 /ZB.sub.3 /OSB.sub.3 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.16           PE.sub.2 /ZB.sub.4 /OSB.sub.3 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1COMP. 3     PE.sub.2 /PEB.sub.2 /OSB.sub.3 /EV.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1______________________________________ 
    
     The target (and approximate actual) gauge (in mils) of each layer of the laminate structures of the invention and the comparative was: 
     
         ______________________________________layer 1  layer 2  layer 3  layer 4                           adhesive                                   layer 5______________________________________0.15   0.15     0.50     1.00   (minimal)                                   0.50______________________________________ 
    
     Sliced turkey breast was stored in packages made from the films of Examples 4, 5, 6 and Comparative 3. A sensory panel tasted the turkey slices to evaluate whether or not zeolites can reduce the off-flavor caused by byproducts of the oxygen-scavenging reaction. 
     The films were triggered by ultraviolet light according to the procedure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,211,875. The films were converted into packages on a Multivac® R7000 packaging machine. Cryovac® T6070B film was used as the bottom web of the packages. Each package contained one slice of turkey. Each package was flushed with a gas mixture consisting of 99% N 2  and 1% O 2 . Packages were stored in the dark for 7 days at 40° F. 
     A sensory panel rated the taste of the turkey slices. The scale ranged from 1 to 6, with 1 indicating extreme off-flavor and 6 indicating no off-flavor. The average scores are summarized in Table 9. In some cases, zeolites can reduce the off-flavor caused by the byproducts of the oxygen-scavenging reaction. 
     
                       TABLE 9______________________________________Film         Average Score______________________________________4            2.35            3.96            2.5COMP. 3      2.6______________________________________ 
    
     In Table 10, two five-layer laminate structures in accordance with the invention, and two comparative five-layer laminate structure, are disclosed. The five-layer structures were each made by laminating a coextruded four-layer film, using a conventional adhesive, to a second film (=layer 5). 
     
                       TABLE 10______________________________________EXAMPLE     STRUCTURE______________________________________7           ZB.sub.5 /PPB.sub.1 /OSB.sub.4 /ZB.sub.6 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1       3COMP. 4     PE.sub.2 /PPB.sub.1 /OSB.sub.4 /PE.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1       18           ZB.sub.5 /PPB.sub.2 /OSB.sub.4 /ZB.sub.6 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1       8COMP. 5     PE.sub.2 /PPB.sub.2 /OSB.sub.4 /PE.sub.2 //AD.sub.2 //F.sub.1______________________________________ 
    
     The target (and approximate actual) gauge (in mils) of each layer of the laminate structures of the invention and the comparative was: 
     
         ______________________________________layer 1  layer 2  layer 3  layer 4                           adhesive                                   layer 5______________________________________0.15   0.15     0.50     1.00   (minimal)                                   0.50______________________________________ 
    
     Sliced turkey breast was stored in packages made from the films of Examples 7 and 8 and Comparatives 4 and 5. A sensory panel tasted the turkey slices to evaluate whether or not zeolites can reduce the off-flavor caused by the byproducts of the oxygen-scavenging reaction. 
     The films were triggered by ultraviolet light according to the procedure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,211,875. The films were converted into packages on a Multivac® R7000 packaging machine. Cryovac® T6070B film was used as the bottom web of the packages. Each package contained one slice of turkey. Each package was flushed with a gas mixture consisting of 99% N 2  and 1% O 2 . Packages were stored in the dark for 7 days at 40° F. 
     A sensory panel rated the taste of the turkey slices. The scale ranged from 1 to 6, with 1 indicating extreme off-flavor and 6 indicating no off-flavor. Table 11 summarizes the percentage of the panelists which did not taste an off-flavor (i.e. a score of 6) in the packaged turkey slices. In some cases, zeolites can significantly reduce the off-flavor caused by the byproducts of the oxygen-scavenging reaction. 
     
                       TABLE 11______________________________________      Percentage of Panelist which      did not taste an off-flavorFilm       in the packaged turkey______________________________________7          39%COMP. 4    17%8          17%COMP. 5    13%______________________________________ 
    
     A headspace gas chromatography (GC) method was used to determine the ability of a material to absorb aldehydes. The material (either 6 to 7 mg of powder or 25 mm disk of LLDPE film containing 4% absorber) was placed in a headspace GC vial (22 mL), and 2 μL of an aldehyde mixture containing about 0.1% each of the indicated aldehydes in methanol was injected into each vial. The vials were incubated at 80° C. for 1 hour and were injected into a GC. The data in Table 12 shows the percent change in the aldehyde concentration for each material relative to an appropriate control (vial with no absorber or LLDPE disk). 
     
                       TABLE 12______________________________________Percent of Aldehydes Absorbed by Candidate AbsorbersSample Propenal  Pentanal Hexanal                           Heptanal                                   Octanal______________________________________Percent Change Relative to Aldehyde ControlZ.sub.5 -77        4       -18     -21     -28Z.sub.6 -57       -93      -99    -100    -100Percent Change Relative to LLDPE ControlZ.sub.4 -95       n/t.sup.c                    -100    -85    n/tZ.sub.3 -92       n/t      -77    -100    n/t______________________________________ n/t means not included in this test 
    
     The data in Table 12 shows that various zeolites are capable of reducing the migration of aldehydes. In addition, due to specificity of various materials it can be seen that blends of materials can be advantageous. 
     Films of the invention can been made by any conventional means, including coextrusion, lamination, extrusion coating, or corona bonding, and then optionally irradiated and/or oriented. They can be made heat shrinkable through orientation or tenterframing if desired, at orientation ratios of 1:2 to 1:9 in either or both of the machine and transverse directions. For shrink applications, they can be made to have a free shrink of at least 10%, more preferably at least 20%, most preferably at least 30%, in either or both directions at 90° C. 
     Gasket compositions of the invention can be made by any conventional process, including, but not limited to, extrusion compounding for thermoplastic compositions, and conventional mixing equipment for plastisol compositions. The gasket compositions of the invention can then be formed into gaskets on lids by any conventional process, including but not limited to, cold molding processes, inserted discs, application of liquid plastisols via pressurized nozzles followed by solidification in an oven, etc. 
     Various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention defined below. For example, a blend of different zeolites can be used in the same article (e.g. film or sealing compound). In films, although it is preferred that the zeolite be used in the film and as a packaging material such that the zeolite is disposed closer to the contents of the package, which can be food or any oxygen-sensitive product, than the oxygen scavenger, there may be applications where the zeolite is disposed &#34;outside of&#34; the oxygen scavenger, such that the oxygen scavenger-containing layer is disposed closer to the contents of a package made from the film, than the zeolite-containing layer. The zeolite can alternatively be disposed on both sides of the oxygen scavenger. Also, within the same film, a first zeolite can be used in a first layer, and a second zeolite, different from the first zeolite, can be used in another layer of the film. 
     Alternatively, the zeolite, in addition to or instead of the arrangements described above, can be disposed in the same layer or layers as the oxygen scavenging material. Thus, by way of example, any of layers 14, 34, 44, and 54 of the examples and figures can include any suitable percent, by weight of the layer, of a zeolite. A preferred blend of oxygen scavenging and zeolite in such a blend layer is between 95% and 99.5% oxygen scavenger, and between 0.5% and 5% zeolite. Any suitable polymeric materials can be employed in films containing the zeolites, and are not limited to those listed herein. The amount of zeolite used in a film of the present invention is preferably between 0.1% and 5% of the layer in which it occurs. These percentages are based on the zeolite material (e.g. zeolite) per se, with suitable adjustment to be made if the zeolite material is used as a masterbatch with another material such as polyethylene. Above 5% of the layer, optics of the film can be compromised to some extent, although the film can still be used in many applications. In end-use applications where optics are not a critical feature of the package, such as opaque films or gaskets for containers, higher amounts of zeolites can be beneficially used. 
     Zeolites disclosed herein can be used with or in films or coatings, or absorbed into a variety of other supports for scavenging or other uses, such as a layer or coating on another object, or as a bottle cap or bottle liner, as an adhesive or non-adhesive insert, sealant, gasket, fibrous matte or other inserts, or as a non-integral component of a rigid, semi-rigid, or flexible container.