Abstract:
An apparatus and method for recharging a rechargeable lead acid battery. The apparatus supplies an overcharge current to the battery during and before completion of recharging of the battery to ameliorate stratification of the battery.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to battery charging, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for ameliorating electrolyte stratification during charging. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Batteries are devices that convert chemical energy contained in active materials directly into electrical energy by means of an oxidization-reduction electrochemical reaction involving the transfer of electrons from one material to another. Lead-acid batteries are one of the most common kinds of batteries. Such a battery includes positive and negative lead electrodes and a mixture of sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) and water between the electrodes. The sulfuric acid provides both the current conducting medium between the positive and negative electrodes, as well as an active material in the electrochemical reactions at the electrodes. 
     During discharge of the battery, the negative electrode is formed by the lead (Pb) being oxidized to Pb 2+ : Pb→Pb 2+ +2e − . 
     The complete reaction is:
 
Pb+H 2 SO 4 →PbSO 4 ↓+2H + +2e − .
 
     Concurrently, the positive electrode is formed by Pb 4+  being reduced to Pb 2+  in the following reaction:
 
Pb 4+ +2e − →Pb 2+ .
 
     The complete reaction is:
 
PbO 2 +H 2 SO 4 +2H + +2e − →PbSO 4 ↓+2H 2 O.
 
     As the lead-acid battery is discharged, lead (Pb) and lead dioxide (PbO 2 ) are converted into lead sulfate (PbSO 4 ). The water (2H 2 O) produced and the sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) consumed dilute the electrolytic solution causing the lower density readings observed on a discharged battery. 
     Lead-acid batteries can be recharged using chargers falling into two broad classes: simple chargers, and closed loop or feedback chargers. Simple chargers deliver a low level charge current to the battery over a timed interval. The current level is chosen to prevent damage to the battery due to overcharging. Feedback chargers, on the other hand, monitor the state of the battery in order to control the magnitude of the charge current during the charge cycle. The charge cycle is composed of a high current phase and a regulation phase. During the high current phase, the feedback charger applies a high charge current to the battery in order to rapidly charge the battery. The feedback charger continues to monitor the state of the battery and reduces the charging current as the charge state of the battery is restored. 
     At room temperature the density of sulfuric acid is 1834 kg/m 3 , which is more than 1.8 times the density of water (1000 kg/m 3 ). This difference in density can cause problems during recharging, particularly when the recharging occurs at a rapid rate, as the relatively higher density of the sulfuric acid causes it to settle downward relative to the water. This problem can be seen in more detail by examining the chemical reactions that occur during recharging. The downward arrows shown beside some products of the reaction indicate that these products are being deposited onto the plates 
     When the lead-acid battery is being charged, sulfuric acid is produced at both electrodes according to the following reactions:
     At the positive electrode: PbSO 4 +2H 2 O→PbO 2 ↓+H 2 SO 4 +2H + +2e −     At the negative electrode: PbSO 4 +2H + +2e − →Pb↓+H 2 SO 4     

     As the sulfuric acid concentration rises near the positive and negative electrodes, the acid&#39;s higher density causes it to pour down the electrodes to raise the acid concentration at the bottom of the cell. This problem is called stratification. 
     Battery voltage depends on the acid concentration. Consequently, higher voltage is required near the bottom of a stratified cell to overcome the elevated equilibrium voltage and drive the charge reaction, leaving the bottom portion less charged. If the problem is not corrected, the conditions at the bottom of the electrodes will progressively deteriorate with every charge cycle performed. Eventually, the capacity of the cell will be irreversibly reduced. 
     In the prior art, this problem has been addressed by providing a 10 to 20% low rate overcharge at the end of every charge cycle. When the rate of electron flow (current) exceeds the rate of the main charge reaction, the unused electrons begin participating in irreversible side reactions (water electroysis):
     The reaction at the positive electrode is 2H 2 O→O 2 +4H + +4e −     The reaction at the negative electrode is 4H + +4e − →2H 2      

     The relationship between current and amount of water decomposed can be evaluated using the Faraday constant (equivalent to 96485 As or 26.8 Ah). As the number of exchanged electrons in the electrolysis reaction is two, 53.6 Ah is required to decompose 1 molar weight of water (18 g). Thus, 1 Ah of overcharge current decomposes 0.336 g of water generating 0.68 liters of gas under normal conditions (at 25 degrees centigrade and normal atmospheric pressure). The gases produced by water electrolysis (H 2  and 0), rise through the system causing an upward mixing movement of the liquid that ameliorates stratification. The intensity of the mixing movement of the gas is controlled by the rate of gassing or overcharge. 
     The solution of providing a 10 to 20% low rate overcharge at the end of every charge cycle suffers from the drawback that it is time-consuming, thereby largely canceling the advantages of rapid recharging. Also, a high overcharge rate tends to corrode the electrodes, thereby shortening the useful life of the battery. These effects are exacerbated at higher temperatures. 
     Thus, a method and apparatus for rapidly recharging batteries while avoiding stratification is desirable. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     An object of one aspect of the present invention is to provide an improved battery charger. 
     In accordance with an aspect of the present invention there is provided a battery charger having generator means for generating a charging current for charging the battery and controller means for controlling the generator means. The generator means is operable to generate an overcharge current increment to be added to the charging current to yield an overcharge current. The controller means includes feedback means for determining at least one of a charge acceptance ability and a state of charge of the rechargeable lead-acid battery during recharging, overcharge instruction means for determining the overcharge current, the overcharge current exceeding the charge acceptance ability of the battery, and current control means for controlling the generator to supply the charging current and the overcharge current increment. The current control means is operable to deliver the overcharge current to the battery during charging. 
     Preferably, the overcharge instruction means is operable to determine an overcharge duration and an overcharge time, and the current control means is operable to deliver the overcharge current to the battery for the overcharge duration at the overcharge time. 
     An object of another aspect of the present invention is to provide an improved method for recharging a rechargeable lead-acid battery. 
     In accordance with this aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for recharging a rechargeable lead-acid battery. The method includes the steps of (a) generating a charging current for charging the battery; (b) supplying the charging current to the battery; (c) determining at least one of the charge acceptance ability and a state of charge of the rechargeable lead-acid battery; (d) determining the overcharge current, the overcharge current exceeding the charge acceptance ability of the battery; (e) determining an overcharge current increment to be added to the charging current to yield the overcharge current; and, (f), during step b, supplying the overcharge current increment to the battery, the current control means being operable to deliver the overcharge current to the battery during charging. 
     Preferably, the method also determines an overcharge duration and an overcharge time. The overcharge current is supplied to the battery for the overcharge duration at the overcharge time. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings which show by way of example preferred embodiments of the present invention and in which: 
         FIG. 1  shows in block diagram form a method for regulating a charging current according to the present invention; 
         FIG. 2  is a flow chart for a charging method according to the present invention; 
         FIG. 3  is a flow chart of a ramp-up function for the charging method of  FIG. 2 ; 
         FIG. 4  is a flow chart of a high current control method for the charging method of  FIG. 2 ; 
         FIG. 5  is a flow chart of a current regulation method for the charging method of  FIG. 2 ; 
         FIG. 6  is a flow chart of the method steps for determining charge acceptance ability according to the present invention; 
         FIG. 7  is a graph showing the relationship between the Ohmic resistance voltage drop and the voltage drop resulting from ion migration through the electrolyte concentration boundary layer; 
         FIG. 8  is a graph showing voltage profiles characteristic of a first class of batteries; 
         FIG. 9  is a graph showing voltage profiles characteristic of a second class of batteries; 
         FIG. 10  is a graph showing control of the charging current based on the terminal voltage profile; 
         FIG. 11  is a block diagram of a battery charger suitable for the charging process according to the present invention; and 
         FIG. 12  is a flow chart of a destratification function of the charging method of FIG.  2 . 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     According to an aspect of the present invention, destratification of a lead-acid battery during recharging is ameliorated by supplying a controlled brief overcharge pulse to the battery to mix the electrolyte at a few different times during the recharging process. Mixing of the electrolyte is most effective when the overcharge pulses are supplied to the battery when the battery is between 60 to 100% state of charge (SOC). The overcharge pulse is carried out by increasing the current supplied to the battery from the charge current to an overcharge current that exceeds the charge acceptance ability (CAA) of the battery for 0.5 to 5 minutes. In the preferred embodiment, the procedure is repeated two to three times during the charge cycle—for example, at around 60, 80 and 95% SOC. 
     According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the charging method substantially conforms to that disclosed in International Patent Application PCT/CA98/00308, published 8 Oct. 1998, and additionally incorporates the destratification function. As taught by this patent application, the lead-acid battery may be fast charged by a feedback charger that monitors the state of the battery to control the magnitude of the charge current during the charge cycle. As will now be described, the present invention applies to fast charging of lead-acid batteries to ameliorate stratification. 
     Referring to  FIG. 11 , there is shown in a block diagram, a battery charger 10 for performing a charging method according to the present invention. The battery charger comprises a controller  12 , a user interface and power control display panels  14 , and a programmable power supply  16 . 
     The programmable power supply  16  generates a charging current I indicated by reference  18  for charging a battery  20 , which is coupled to the charger  10 . The controller  12  is coupled to an analog input on the programmable power supply  16  through a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter  22 . The D/A converter  22  provides an analog control signal output to the power supply representing the relative level of the charging current I to be applied to the battery  20 . The analog input accepts a control voltage signal from the D/A converter  22  in the range 0 to 10 VDC. The control voltage signal represents a range of 0% to 100% of the full scale output current capacity of the programmable power supply  16 . 
     The programmable supply  16  also includes a buffered digital input/output (I/O) interface coupled to respective output and input ports on the controller  12 . The programmable power supply  16  receives digital control signals issued by the controller  12  for setting the charging current I ON/OFF and for clearing a FAULT condition. Preferably, the power supply  16  accepts a digital input signal from the controller  12  which causes the instantaneous shut-down to 0% output charging current I. The programmable power supply  16  also outputs digital signals to the controller  12  to indicate status and fault conditions—for example, over-temperature, DC bus voltage too high, DC bus voltage too low. One skilled in the art will be familiar with the implementation of the programmable power supply  16 . 
     The controller  12  comprises a microprocessor, or processor board, which has been suitably programmed to execute a charging program and stratification control method according to the present invention. The charging process is configured by parameters that are entered through the user interface and power control display panels  14 . The user interface and power control display panels  14  preferably include a display and a keyboard, or keypad, for entering the charge parameters for a battery type. The user interface and power control panels  14  may also include input devices for reading battery parameter identifiers associated with certain known types of battery. The incorporation of multiple user interface and power control display panels into the battery charger of  FIG. 11  allows several batteries to be assigned to the same charging station, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,548,200. 
     The controller  12  uses the user interface and power control display panels  14  to display battery charge status, charging system status indicators, fault conditions and diagnostic information. The display panel also includes input keys to start/stop the battery charging process, and display prompts/messages for prompting the user to connect the battery  20  to the charger  10  and enter the charge parameters. 
     As described above, the charger  10  operates as a feedback charging system. As shown in  FIG. 11 , the charger  10  includes sensors for monitoring various parameters of the battery  20 . The sensors include a charging current sensor  26 , a battery voltage sensor  28 , a battery pressure sensor  30 , a battery temperature sensor  32  and a battery electrolyte sensor  42 . The sensors  26 ,  28 ,  30 ,  32  and  42  comprise analog process measurement circuits and are coupled to respective input ports in the controller  12  through an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter and controller  34 . 
     The charging current sensor  26  monitors the charging current I and is implemented using a current transducer, such as the LEM Module LT 500 available from LEM S.A. of Switzerland, connected to a load resistor and an analog amplifier (not shown) for conditioning the signal. The implementation of such analog circuitry will be familiar to one skilled in the art. 
     The battery voltage sensor  28  monitors the output voltage of the battery  20  and preferably comprises a scalable signal conditioning amplifier (not shown) having galvanic isolation, for example, provided by an opto-coupler (not shown). 
     The battery pressure sensor  30  monitors the internal pressure of the battery  20  and is implemented using a suitable pressure transducer such as the PX302 model available from Omega Engineering Inc. 
     The battery electrolyte level sensor  42  monitors the level of the electrolytic solution in the battery. If this level is too low, then this information is communicated to a battery watering system control  44  via A/D converter  34 , which controls water supply  46  and watering system  48  to add water to the battery. 
     The battery temperature sensor  32  monitors the internal temperature of the battery  20  and is implemented using a solid state thermal sensor which is placed in contact with the exterior wall of the battery  20 . A suitable temperature sensor is the LM335A solid state device available from National Semiconductor of Santa Clara, Calif. The temperature sensor  32  may include an analog conditioning amplifier (not shown) to condition the output signal from the temperature sensor  32 . The output signals from the sensors  26 - 32  and  42  are fed into the A/D converter and controller  34  and digitized for input by the controller  12 . Preferably, the A/D converter and controller  34  comprises a high speed 12-bit converter. 
     The digitized signals read by controller  12  from the A/D converter and controller  34  are utilized by the battery charging program and method in conjunction with battery and charge parameters inputted by the user. In response to the inputs, the process control program for the battery charger  10  calculates and updates the control commands for the programmable power supply  15 . The process control program also continues to monitor the status and operation of the programmable power supply  16 . If any faults are detected, the battery charging program terminates the charging cycle, i.e. turns off the power supply  16  and indicates the abort or fault status on the user interface and power control display panels  14  and on the LED status indicators  36 . Specifically, a Red LED status indicator being “On” indicates that a fault has occurred. The Amber LED being “On” indicates that the station is charging a connected battery. The Green LED being “On” indicates that the station is on Standby, or is ready to start charging or has finished charging. If a fault requires immediate attention, then audio indicator  38  is used to alert the user that immediate attention is required. The processing steps embodied in the battery charging program and method are described in detail below with reference to  FIGS. 1  to  10 . 
     The maximum rate at which a battery can accept current at any given moment without being overcharged is termed the charge acceptance ability (CAA). CAA is a function of the state of charge, temperature, age of the battery and previous charging history. According to a preferred aspect of the invention, terminal voltage profiles are used to determine both CAA and state of charge (SOC) as taught by International Patent Application PCT/CA98/00308, published 8 Oct. 1998. However, other ways of determining both CAA and SOC are well known to those skilled in the art, and it will be apparent to those skilled in the art how the present invention may be implemented regardless of the particular method used to determine CAA and SOC. 
     Referring to  FIG. 1 , there is illustrated in a block diagram the organization of a battery charging program in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The battery charging program  100  comprises a charging control module  102 , a user interface module  104 , a charger output module  106 , a charger input module  108 , and a process measurement module  110 . 
     The charging control module  102  comprises the method steps for controlling the charging of the battery according to the present invention, and is described in more detail below. The user interface module  104  provides the functions that control the operation of the user interface and power control display panels  14  (FIG.  11 ). The user interface module  104  processes inputs entered by the user into charge control parameters which are used by the charge control module, which are described in more detail below. The user interface module  104  also displays data from the charging control module  102  on the charging process as process outputs and as diagnostic information  116  on the user interface and power control display panels  14 . 
     The charger output module  106  controls the operation of the programmable power supply  16  in response to control commands issued by the charging control module  102 . The charger output module  106  provides the digital control signals to the D/A converter  22  to generate the control voltage signal for the programmable power supply  16 . The charger output module  106  also generates the digital output signals, e.g. charge current ON/OFF and FAULT reset, to control the programmable power supply  16 . 
     The charger input module  108  receives the status and fault signals issued by the programmable power supply  16 . The status and fault condition signals are received on the input port of the controller  12  and transmitted to the charging control module  102  for processing. For example, in response to a power supply over-temperature condition, the charging control module  102  aborts charging the battery  20 , the power supply  16  is shut down through the charger output modulel  106 , and an “abort message” is displayed on the user interface and power control display panels  14  by the user interface module  104 . 
     The process measurement module  110  oversees the input of signals from the charging current, battery voltage, battery pressure, and battery temperature sensors  26 ,  28 ,  30 ,  32  (FIG.  11 ). The analog inputs from the sensors are then digitized by the A/D converter  34 . The digitized information obtained from the sensors is then stored in memory for use by the charging control module  102  as will be described in more detail below. 
     Reference is next made to  FIG. 2 , which shows the operation of the battery charger  10  and the charging control module according to the present invention. 
     At the start, the charging control  102  reads the battery type identifier in step  103  if the charger  10  includes an input device for reading the battery identifier. If the charger  10  does not include a reader for the battery type, then the user is prompted to input the battery type using the interface  14 . The battery type information is used to select an appropriate Parameter table in step  105 . 
     The terminal voltage profile and the Parameter table are dependent on the type of battery. According to this aspect of the invention, batteries are categorized in Group I or Group II. Group I batteries comprise the most common battery types and include lead-acid and nickel-cadmium batteries. Group I batteries have a terminal voltage profile with a slope dV/dt as shown in FIG.  8 . The terminal voltage profile is defined as the voltage of the battery when the charging current I is interrupted or varied as will be described below. At the beginning of the charging process for a Group I battery (i.e. the battery is discharged and the actual charging rate is below the battery charge acceptance ability), the slope dV/dt for the terminal voltage profile is almost flat as shown by curve  120   a.  As the battery is charged, the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile increases as shown by curves  120   b ,  120   c ,  120   d . Eventually, the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile reaches its maximum value as shown by curve  122 . The maximum-slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile, i.e. curve  122  in  FIG. 8 , means that charge acceptance ability, CAA, of the battery has been reached and that the charging current I must be reduced in order to avoid overheating and damaging the battery. 
     Group II batteries comprise nickel-metal hydride batteries. Group II batteries have a terminal voltage profile with a slope dV/dt as shown by the curves in FIG.  9 . When the battery is fully discharged, the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile (i.e. taken during the current variation interval) will exhibit a maximum slope dV/dt as denoted by curve  124   a  in FIG.  9 . As the battery is charged, the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile (e.g. taken during successive current variation intervals) decreases as shown by curves  124   b ,  124   c  and  124   d  in FIG.  9 . When the battery is charged, i.e. the charging rate reaches the charge acceptance ability, the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile approaches zero as shown by curve  126  in FIG.  9 . 
     The Parameter table read in step  105  is dependent on the particular type of battery, e.g. nickel-cadmium or lead-acid (Group I) or nickel-metal hydride (Group II). The table preferably includes charge parameters, safety limits, and a sampling rate or resolution for the input/output timers described in more detail below. Preferably, the parameters-for various types of batteries contemplated for the charger  10  are stored in non-volatile memory, which is accessible by the controller  12 . 
     As shown in  FIG. 2 , there are two modules  201 ,  202  which handle the data acquisition and control command transfer, respectively, with the charger  10 . The data acquisition module  201  oversees the input of data from the sensors  26  to  32  (FIG.  11 ). The real time process module  202  outputs the digital control signals and the current control signal (via the D/A converter  22 ) to the programmable power supply  16 . 
     In step  203  of the real time process control module  202 , a time-base for outputting the output control commands is generated. Next at step  205 , the output control commands are sent to the appropriate hardware drivers. As shown, there is also a loop-back path  207  between the real time process control module  202  and the real time data-acquisition module  201 . The loop-back  207  provides a “trigger” for the real time data acquisition module  201  as described below. 
     Referring to  FIG. 2 , in step  209  the data acquisition module  201  generates a time-base for inputting, i.e. sampling, data. The sampling rate depends on the particular hardware being utilized and the desired resolution for the process control, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. For example, sampling once every  60  microseconds is suitable for the charger. In step  211 , the data acquisition module  201  collects (at the sampling rate) current readings I 1 , . . . I n  from the charging current sensor  26  (FIG.  11 ), voltage readings V 1 , . . . V n  from the battery voltage sensor  28 , pressure readings P 1 , . . . P n  from the battery pressure sensor  30 , and temperature readings T 1 , . . . T n  from the battery temperature sensor  32 . 
     In step  213 , values for average voltage V av , average charging current I av , Coulombic charge Q, charge energy E, and elapsed charging time are calculated from the input data. The average current I av , and average voltage V av , values are calculated over a selected period. For example, one second. The Coulombic charge Q is calculated by integrating the values for the charging current I 1 , . . . I n  and the charge energy E is calculated from the average current I av″  and the average voltage V av . 
     In step  211 , data corresponding to the high value for the charging current I Hi , the low value for the charging current I Low , the high value for the voltage V Hi , the low value for the voltage V Low , are also read in conjunction with the trigger provided on the loop-back path  207  from the real time process control module  202 . The trigger for the high charging current I Hi  comprises the output command to the programmable power supply  16  to raise the charging current I to the high value. Similarly, the trigger for the low charging current I Low  comprises the output command to the power supply  16  to lower the charging current I to the low value. The values for the high voltage V Hi  and the low voltage V Low , are read in a similar manner. The data generated by the data acquisition module  201  is stored in memory for further processing. 
     Referring to  FIG. 2 , at the beginning of a charging cycle, status is set to ‘RAMP UP” in block  107 . The Ramp Up status means that the charging current I is ramped-up or increased to a HIGH current level. Then during the HIGH current phase of the charging cycle, the charging current I is maintained at a HIGH value until the charge acceptance ability of the battery is reached, at which time the charging current is regulated to complete or finish the charging of the battery. 
     In step  109 , the “RAMP UP” status is checked. If the charger  10  is in RAMP UP mode, then a Ramp Up procedure  300  is called in step  111 . The function of the Ramp Up procedure  300  is to increase or ramp the charging current I to the maximum value I Max  allowed for the particular battery being charged. The maximum current I Max  is conveniently stored in the Parameter table. The Ramp Up procedure  300  is shown in more detail in FIG.  3 . 
     Referring to  FIG. 3 , the first operation performed by the Ramp-Up procedure  300  is to calculate the charge acceptance ability CAA of the battery being charged. In step  301 , a charge acceptance ability procedure  400  is called, and the charge acceptance ability procedure  400  is shown in more detail in FIG.  6 . The function of the charge acceptance procedure  400  is to determine whether the charge acceptance ability of the battery has been reached. If the charge acceptance ability of the battery has not been reached, then the charging current I can be increased to continue the fast charging of the battery. According to this aspect of the invention, the charge acceptance ability CAA is determined from the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile (FIGS.  9  and  10 ). 
     As shown in  FIG. 6 , the charge acceptance ability procedure  400  first checks the mode of operation in step  401 , and more specifically, if the mode is REGULATE. If the mode of operation is not REGULATE, then the charger  10  is in HIGH CURRENT or RAMP UP mode and the battery type is next checked in step  403 . As described above, the charging method according to the present invention distinguishes between Group I and Group II batteries and uses the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile to ascertain the charge acceptance ability CAA of the battery. If the battery is a nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) battery in Group II, then the slope dV/dt for the terminal voltage profile approaches zero ( FIG. 9 ) when the charge acceptance ability is reached. Conversely, for Group I batteries the slope, dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile reaches a maximum ( FIG. 8 ) when the charge acceptance ability is reached. For a Group I battery, the charge acceptance ability CAA is calculated in step  405  by taking the difference between the maximum value for the slope dV/dt Max , and the present slope dV/dt for the terminal voltage profile. The maximum value for the slope dV/dt Max,  is conveniently stored in the Parameter table. As the battery is charged, the difference between the maximum slope dV/dt Max  and the actual slope dV/dt will become smaller, and the charge acceptance ability is reached when CAA=0 in step  405 . 
     The terminal voltage profile is measured during a variation interval in the charging current or calculated from the terminal voltage by means of charging current I and battery internal resistance when the current is not interrupted. As shown in  FIG. 7 , when the charging current I is interrupted or varied, there is a drop in the terminal voltage (represented by the curve in  FIG. 7 ) comprising two components or phases: voltage V R  and voltage V D . The voltage V R  is a voltage transpose and occurs almost immediately after the charging current I is varied, indicated at time T 1  in FIG.  7 . The voltage transpose ΔV R , is caused almost entirely by Ohmic losses inside the battery (e.g. Ohmic losses in the posts, plates, intercell wiring and the like). The second component comprises a voltage charge ΔV D , in the terminal voltage. The voltage charge ΔV D  has a slope dV/dt and according to this aspect of the invention the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile is utilized to determine the charge acceptance ability of the battery. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 6 , for a Group II battery, i.e. nickel-metal hydride, the charge acceptance ability CAA is calculated in step  407 . According to this aspect of the invention, the slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile approaches a minimum when the battery is charged. In step  407 , the charge acceptance ability CAA is calculated as the difference between the minimum slope dV/dt MIN  and the current slope dV/dt of the terminal voltage profile. For a NiMH battery, the difference between the minimum slope dV/dt MIN  and the slope dV/dt will approach zero. 
     Referring to FIG.  6 . if the charger is operating in LOW CURRENT MODE, i.e. STATUS=REGULATE is TRUE, then a counter flag “n” is checked in step  409 . In REGULATE mode, the charge acceptance ability CAA is monitored in order to maintain the charging current I at an optimal level. (The counter flag n is set by the Regulate procedure as will be described below). For the first pass after the REGULATE state has commenced the flag n will be one and the procedure  400  goes to step  415 . In step  411 , a parameter I·dV/dI is updated. The parameter I·dV/dI represents the step changes in the charging current I during the regulation phase and the resulting changes in the voltage dV. The relationship between the step decreases in the charging current I and the changes dV in the terminal voltage is shown in FIG.  10 . In order to simplify the calculation, the step size for decreasing the charging current I is selected so that I/dI is a constant. 
     Accordingly then in step  411 , only the change in voltage dV needs to be measured. Next in step  413 , the charge acceptance ability CAA is calculated as the difference between the first reading (I·dV/dI) 1  and the present reading (I·dV/dI) n . The first reading (I·dV/dI) 1  corresponds to the state where CAA is zero, i.e. the battery charge acceptance ability had been reached. If the charge acceptance ability value calculated in step  413  is not zero, it means that the battery is not fully charged, and the setpoint can be increased. If the counter flag n is TRUE (i.e. n=1 in step  409 ), then the charge acceptance ability CAA is set to zero in step  415  to indicate that the battery is charged and the reading (I·dV/dI) 1  is updated in step  417 . Control then returns to the calling procedure at step  419 . 
     Referring back to FIG.  3  and the Ramp-Up procedure  300 , at step  303  the procedure  300  checks if the charge acceptance ability CAA is greater than zero. If the CAA is greater than zero, then the battery is not fully charged and the charge current I can be increased or ramped-up further. In step  305 , the charging current I is incrementally increased. In step  307 , the setting for charging current I is compared to the maximum allowable current setting I max  (stored in the Parameter table). If the maximum value for the charging current I is reached, then the status flag is set to HIGH in step  309  to indicate that the charger  10  is operating at high current, and therefore the ramp-up of the charging current I is complete. In step  311 , the Ramp-Up procedure  300  returns to the charger control  100 . 
     As shown in  FIG. 3 , if the charge acceptance ability CAA is not greater than zero, then the Ramp-Up procedure  300  checks if the charge acceptance ability CAA is equal to zero in step  313 . If the charge acceptance ability CAA is not equal to zero, i.e. negative, then the charge acceptance ability for the battery has been exceeded and accordingly the charging current I is reduced in step  315 . If the charge acceptance ability CAA is zero (or the maximum charging current has not been reached—step  307  described above), then the Ramp-Up function  300  compares the reading for terminal (e.g. resistance free) voltage V rf  (i.e. taken during a variation in the charging current I) to the setpoint voltage SV ref  in step  317 . If the voltage reading V rf  exceeds the setpoint voltage SV ref , then the Ramp-Up operation should be terminated and the status flag is set to “Regulate” in step  319 , and the counter flag “n” is set to zero in step  321  to indicate that the Regulate phase has been commenced. (The counter flag “n” is used by the charge acceptance procedure  400  as described above.) If the terminal voltage V rf  is still less than the setpoint voltage SV ref , then the Ramp-Up procedure  300  checks if the time for ramping-up the charging current I has expired in step  323 . For example, if the ramp-up current is not reached within a predetermined time, then there could be a fault and such a condition should be flagged. The Ramp-Up procedure  300  then returns to the calling procedure in step  311 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 2 , the charging control program  102  checks if the status has been set to HIGH in step  113 . The status is set to HIGH by the Ramp-Up procedure  300  when the maximum charging current I max  is reached as described above. If status is HIGH, then the charging control program  100  calls a High Current Control procedure  500  in step  115 . Referring to  FIG. 4 , the High Current Control procedure  500  controls the charging current I once it has been ramped-up to the maximum value I max . As shown in  FIG. 4 , the first operation involves updating the value for the terminal voltage V rf  in step  501 . The terminal voltage V rf  is updated in step  501  based on the current values obtained by the data acquisition module  201  for the voltage V, current I, and resistance R. The terminal or resistance free voltage is calculated according to the expression: 
         V   RF     =           ⁢       V   Hi     -         I   Hi     ⁡     (       V   Hi     -           ⁢     V   Low       )         (       I   Hi     -     I   Low       )             
 
and the resistance R is calculated according to the expression:
 
 R= ( V   Hi   −V   Low )( I   Hi   −I   Low )
 
     The readings for voltage and current are taken when the charging current I is interrupted or varied. In the context of the present invention, the variation in the charging current I provides a window to measure the voltage and current parameters in order to calculate the terminal, i.e. resistance free, voltage V rf  for the battery. The variations in the charging current I are regulated by the controller  12  and the programmable power supply  16  (FIG.  11 ). Suitable variations in the current I include a step change (e.g. the current is turned off, decreased to a non-zero value or increased), a ramped change, a sinusoidal change, an exponential change, a logarithmic change. 
     Next in step  503 , the High Current Control procedure  500  checks if the value for the terminal voltage V rf  is less than the setpoint voltage SV ref . If the voltage V rf  is less than the setpoint voltage SV ref , then the charge acceptance ability CAA of the battery is updated in step  505 . The charge acceptance ability CAA for the battery is calculated as described above with reference to FIG.  6 . If the charge acceptance voltage CAA is greater than zero (step  507 ), then the battery can take more charging current and accordingly the setpoint reference voltage SV ref  is increased in step  509 . According to this aspect of the invention, the setpoint voltage SV ref  is optimally adjusted using the charge acceptance ability CAA of the battery. 
     As a safety check, the setpoint voltage SV ref  adjusted in step  509  is compared to a maximum setpoint reference voltage (SV ref ) MAX  in step  511 . If the maximum setpoint voltage (SV ref ) MAX  has been reached, then further charging could damage the battery so the charging status is set to REGULATE in step  513 . Similarly, if the charge acceptance ability CAA is not greater than zero (step  507 ), then the charge status is set to REGULATE in step  513 . Next, in step  515 , the counter flag “n” is reset to zero, and High current control procedure returns (step  517 ) to the charging control module  102 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 2 , the charging control program  102  next checks if the status is set for the REGULATE operation in step  117 . (As described above, the High Current Control procedure  500  sets the status to REGULATE.) In step  119 , a Charging Current Regulate procedure is called by the charging control program  102 . The function of the Charging Current Regulate procedure  600  is to regulate the charging current I in order to finish or complete the charging of the battery. 
     Reference is made in  FIG. 5  which shows the Current Regulate procedure  600  in more detail. In step  601 , the Regulate procedure  601  calculates the current value for the terminal, i.e. resistance free, voltage V rf  using the voltage, current and resistance readings obtained by the data acquisition module  201  (FIG.  2 ). Next in step  603 , the updated terminal voltage V rf  is compared to the setpoint voltage SV ref . If the voltage is greater than the setpoint voltage SV ref , then the Current Regulate procedure  600  ascertains if an equalization operation is to be performed in step  605 . An equalization operation involves overcharging the battery at the end of a charge cycle with an elevated charging current I. The purpose of the elevated charging current is to bring all the cells in the battery pack to a full charge. The equalization operation is typically performed once every fifty charge cycles for a battery pack. If an equalization operation is being conducted, the charging current I is compared to the equalization current value I eq  in step  607 . If the charging current I is less than the predetermined equalization current I eq , then the charging current I is set to the equalization value I eq  in step  609  and the charge status is set to EQUALIZE in step  611 . The Regulate procedure  600  then returns to the charging control program  102  in step  613 . 
     Referring to  FIG. 5 , if equalization has not been selected (step  605 ) or the charging current I exceeds the equalization current (step  607 ), then the counter flag “n” is advanced in step  615 . Next in step  617 , the charging current I is incrementally decreased because the setpoint voltage has been reached. In step  619  the charge acceptance ability CAA is calculated by calling the charge acceptance procedure  400  (as described above with reference to FIG.  6 ). The step change in the charging current I in step  617  provides a convenient variation in the charging current I for determining the slope dV/dt. If the charge acceptance ability CAA as determined in step  619  is greater than zero (step  621 ), then the battery can take more charge and the setpoint voltage SV ref  is checked in step  623 . If the setpoint voltage SV ref  is already at the maximum set point reference voltage (SV ref ) max , then the procedure  600  returns control to the charging control program  102  in step  613 . On the other hand, if the maximum setpoint voltage (SV ref ) max  has not been reached, then the setpoint reference voltage SV ref  is incrementally increased in step  625 , and control is returned to the charging control program  102 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 2 , next in step  121 , the end of the charging cycle is checked. The end of the charging cycle is determined by looking at one or more selected parameters. The parameters include the elapsed charge time, the value for the Coulombic charge Q, the value for charging current compared to the minimum charging current I MIN , and the rate of change in the battery voltage dV/dt. For example, if the charging current being applied to the battery has tapered to the minimum value I MIN , then it is assumed that the battery has been charged, i.e. it cannot accept further charge. Similarly, if the rate of change of battery voltage is essentially zero, then it is assumed that the battery is charged. 
     On the basis of an end of charge condition in step  121 , a normal end of charge sequence is initiated in step  123 . If a finishing or equalization charge ( FIG. 5 ) is being applied, then the end of charge corresponds to the termination of the finishing charge sequence. The end of charge sequence (step  123 ) includes an orderly shutdown of the programmable power supply  16  (FIG.  11 ), i.e. the charging current I, and other hardware devices, followed by displaying a notification message on panels  14 . 
     If the end of the cycle has not been reached, the charging process continues and the safety limits are checked in step  125 . The safety check in step  125  ensures that the charging cycle is still proceeding within the prescribed safety limits. The parameters checked in step  125  include the maximum allowable voltage V MAX , the minimum voltage V MIN , the maximum allowable battery temperature T Max , the maximum allowable Coulombic charge Q Max , the battery internal resistance R, and the battery pressure P. The maximum allowable values for these parameters depend on the electrochemical characteristics of the battery being charged, and may be conveniently stored in the Parameter table. 
     If one of the safety limits is exceeded in step  125 , a fault condition is entered in step  127 , and the charging cycle is terminated in step  129 . The termination of the charging cycle is indicated on the display panels  14 . 
     On the other hand, if the safety limits have not been exceeded, the charging cycle continues and the process control parameters and data are updated in step  131 . The control parameters and data control the magnitude and application (i.e. variation) of the charging current being applied to the battery. The control parameters are then passed to the real time control module  202  in order to control the hardware devices, e.g. the programmable power supply  16 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 2 , the charging control program checks if one of three overcharge current pulses according to overcharge instructions D 1 , D 2  and D 3  should be supplied to the battery  20  in step  137 . In step  137 , a Destratificafion Procedure  700  is called by the charging control program  102 . The function of the Destratification Procedure  700  is to periodically augment the charging current I for short periods. 
     The Destratification Procedure  700  provides a method of acid agitation that can be incorporated into a rapid charge algorithm. A few times during rapid recharge of the lead-acid battery  20 , a controlled brief overcharge pulse is deployed to mix the electrolyte in the battery  20 . Mixing is most effective when deployed between 60 and 100% SOC. The overcharge is carried out by increasing the current supplied to the battery for 0.5 to 5 minutes. Preferably, the overcharge pulses are delivered for between 2 to 2.5 minutes. Measurements of the electrolyte specific gravity have shown that a single overcharge pulse of the above mentioned duration and intensity can sufficiently mix the electrolyte. Preferably, this procedure is repeated 2 to 3 times during each charge cycle at around 60, 80 and 95% SOC. Alternatively, in embodiments in which charging current is adjusted based on CAA, the overcharge pulse may be delivered when the current has tapered down to a certain percentage of I max —for example, at 50% I max , 20% I max  and 10% I max . 
     After the overcharge pulse is delivered, the current is reduced to below one tenth of battery capacity to stabilize the voltage of the battery. The need to stabilize the voltage of the battery arises from the heterogeneous nature of the electrochemical reactions occurring in the battery during charging and discharging. Specifically, these reactions typically occur in five steps:
     1. Diffusion of reacting species through the boundary layer to the plate surface.   2. Adsorption of reactants at the plate surface.   3. Chemical reaction at the surface of the plate.   4. Incorporation of solid products into the plate crystal structure.   5. Diffusion of reaction products through the boundary layer away from the plates.   

     Termination of current supplied to the battery does not result in immediate cessation of all of the reactions driven by the current. Specifically, steps 1, 2, 4 and 5 will all continue at a diminishing rate after the current is terminated. With respect to step 3, only the electrochemical portion of the surface chemical reactions stops immediately on cessation of the current. The non-electrochemical reactions in step 3 will continue at a diminishing rate. Thus, after the overcharge current is terminated at least 5 to 60 seconds must be allowed for all of the reactions to subside, and recommencement of charging should preferably be delayed for this period. In the preferred embodiment, the current is increased back up to the usual charging current that tracks the CAA after at least five seconds and preferably after about thirty seconds. 
     The timing, duration, and magnitude of the overcharge pulse, as well as the duration and magnitude of the voltage stabilizing current that follows, are specified in the overcharge instructions D 1 , D 2  and D 3  for the first, second and third overcharges respectively. In the specific rapid recharging method according to the preferred embodiment, the charge current I C  normally tracks the battery charge acceptance CAA at least for the latter part of the charging cycle. During the early part of the charging cycle, the charger is in RAMP UP mode such that the charging current is set at I Max . I Max  will normally be the maximum current that the battery charger  10  can provide. In the latter part of the recharge cycle, when the overcharge pules are delivered, the CAA of the battery  20  will drop below I Max , at which point I C  will track CAA. The current delivered to the battery  20  during the three brief periods of overcharge will equal the CAA at that time plus in amperes between one fifth and one twentieth of the battery&#39;s capacity in ampere hours (the hour component of the battery capacity should be disregarded in this calculation). The total currents delivered during the first, second and third overcharge periods are designated I D1 , I D2 , and I D3  respectively. 
     These overcharge pulses will not be supplied to the battery during the RAMP UP mode of recharging as the charger current I C  will be at I max . However, at this point during recharging, the overcharge instructions D 1 , D 2  and D 3  are enabled in steps  732 ,  734  and  736  respectively (FIG.  12 ). After the RAMP UP mode has ended, these overcharges will be successively delivered to the battery  20  in step  720 . 
     The amount of overcharge delivered by this method is minimal. Typically, it is in the order of 1% of total charge returned, which is significantly less than the 10 to 20% overcharge required by the standard method. The total overcharge delivered should not be more than 5% of total charge returned. The time required to perform an overcharge is shortened from hours to minutes. 
     Referring to  FIG. 12 , Destratification Procedure  700  queries whether the battery  20  is connected to the battery charger  10  in step  702 . If the battery  20  is not connected to the battery charger  10 , then step  702  returns the answer “no” and Destratification Procedure proceeds to step  704  in which overcharge instructions D 1 , D 2  and D 3  are disabled. The Destratification Procedure  700  then returns to the charging control program  102  in step  706 . 
     If Destratification Procedure  700  returns the answer yes in step  702 , then the procedure next proceeds to step  708  in which the battery parameters are checked. Then, procedure  700  checks the charge status of the battery  20  in step  710 . In step  712 , Destratification Procedure  700  queries whether the charger  10  is in RAMP UP mode. If the charger  10  is in RAMP UP mode then the Destratification Procedure next proceeds to step  724 . In this step, the charge current is determined. Step  726  then queries whether the charge current exceeds the first overcharge current I D1 . If the charge current I C  is greater than I D1  then the Destratification Procedure next proceeds to step  732  in which D 1  is enabled. If the charge current I C  is not greater than I D1 , then Destratification Procedure  700  proceeds to step  728 . In step  728 , procedure  700  checks whether charge current I C  is greater than the second overcharge current I D2 . If step  728  returns the answer yes, then the Destratification Procedure  700  goes to step  734  in which overcharge pulse instructions D 2  are enabled. If charge current I C  is not greater than overcharge pulse I D2 , then Destratification Procedure  700  goes to step  730 . Step  730  returns the answer yes if the charge current exceeds the third overcharge pulse I D3 , and otherwise returns the answer no. If I C  is greater than I D3 , then Destratification Procedure  700  proceeds to step  736  in which overcharge instructions D 3  are enabled. Destratification Procedure then returns to the charging control program  102  in step  738 . 
     Referring back to step  712 , if the battery charger is not currently in RAMP UP mode then the Destratification Procedure  700  goes to step  714 . On the first time through step  714  during a particular run of Procedure  700 , counter I will be set equal to 1. The Destratification Procedure  700  next proceeds to step  716 , which queries whether the I th  overcharge instructions D i  are enabled. All of the destratification pulses D 1 , D 2  and D 3  will initially be enabled provided that I max  is greater than each of overcharge pulses I D1 , I D2  and I D3 . However, after each overcharge is delivered, the particular overcharge instructions for that overcharge will be disabled in step  722 . Assuming that, on the first run through, D 1  is enabled, the Destratification Procedure  700  next proceeds to step  718 , which queries whether charge current I C  is less than overcharge pulse I D1 . If step  718  returns the answer no, then Destratification Procedure will return to the calling procedure in step  738 . If step  718  returns the answer yes, then Destratification Procedure  700  will next proceed to step  719 . In step  719 , a overcharge increment ΔI, used to add to the charging current to obtain the overcharge current, is adjusted based on the temperature of the battery relative to a reference temperature, the SOC of the battery and on empirical constants that vary from battery to battery. Specifically, a default overcharge increment ΔI o  will initially be set to be a charge increment sufficient to raise I D1  the desired amount above the CAA. The actual overcharge increment ΔI is then calculated from the default overcharge increment ΔI o  using the formula shown. In the formula, the reference temperature T o  is subtracted from the actual T as the amount of overcharge required will vary depending on the temperature of the battery. Similarly, the amount of overcharge required will vary depending on the SOC of the battery. In the preferred embodiment, the reference temperature T o  is 25 degrees centigrade and the empirical constants a, b and c vary as follows: (−10≦a≦10; −0.1≦b≦0.1; 0≦c≦1). Following step  719 , Destratification Procedure  700  proceeds to step  720 . In step  720  the overcharge pulse I D1  is delivered to the battery  20 . Then, in step  722 , overcharge instructions D 1  are disabled. After step  722 , Destratification Procedure  700  returns to the calling procedure at step  738 . 
     The next time the Destratification Procedure  700  is invoked by step  137  of the charging method of  FIG. 2 , the first overcharge instructions D 1  will be disabled. Thus, when Procedure  700  reaches step  716 , and i is set equal to 1 in step  714 , step  716  will return the answer “no” as D 1  was previously disabled. Then Procedure  700  will return to step  714 , where i is set equal to 2, and step  716  will then return the answer “yes” as D 2  has not yet been disabled. Similarly, after D 1  and D 2  have been disabled, Procedure  700  will loop back to steps  714  and  716  twice before proceeding to step  718  to query whether I c  is greater than I D3 . If step  718  returns the answer yes, then overcharge increment ΔI will be determined in step  719  and overcharge instructions D 3  will be executed in step  720  and then disabled in step  722 , before the Procedure  700  returns to the charging control program  102  in step  138 . At that point, the destratification function will be complete for that recharging of the battery. 
     The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. In particular, while the destratification function has been described within the context of a particular rapid recharging method, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the destratification function may be advantageously combined with other rapid recharging methods. Furthermore, while the overcharging method described has involved interrupting the charging current to supply overcharge currents during time intervals, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the overcharge current may also be supplied continuously during charging. Therefore, the presently discussed embodiments are considered to be illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of the fluency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.