Abstract:
In a cellular mobile communications network a mobile station is capable of receiving a downlink signal from each of a plurality of base stations and transmitting an uplink signal to the plurality of the base stations through a wireless channel. The mobile station produces a measure of signal quality of the downlink signals from the plurality of base stations to the mobile station and selects a base station from which the downlink signal shows a preferred signal quality. The mobile station transmits an uplink signal indicating the selected base station among the plurality of base stations for subsequent communications with the mobile station. Each base station processes the uplink signal to identify the selected base station from among the plurality of base stations.

Description:
This application is a divisional of Ser. No. 09/696,574, filed Oct. 25, 2000, now pending, which is a continuation of PCT application Ser. No. PCT/GB99/01347, filed on Apr. 28, 1999. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to cellular mobile communication networks, for example Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) cellular networks. 
     2. Description of the Prior Art 
       FIG. 1  of the accompanying drawings shows parts of a cellular mobile telecommunication network according to the Telecommunication Industries Association (TIA)/Electronic Industries Association (EIA) Standard TIA/EIA/IS-95 of October 1994 (hereinafter “IS95”). Each of three base transceiver stations (BTSS)  4  (BTS 1 , BTS 2  and BTS 3 ) is connected via a fixed network  5  to a base station controller (BSC)  6 , which is in turn connected to a mobile switching center (MSC)  7 . The BSC  6  serves to manage the radio resources of its connected BTSs  4 , for example by performing hand-off and allocating radio channels. The MSC  7  serves to provide switching functions and coordinates location registration and call delivery. 
     Each BTS  4  serves a cell  8 . When a mobile station (MS)  10  is in a so-called “soft hand-off” (SHO) region  9  where two or more cells overlap, a mobile station can receive transmission signals (downlink signals) of comparable strength and quality from the respective BTSs of the overlapping cells. Transmission signals (uplink signals) produced by the mobile station (MS) can also be received at comparable strengths and qualities by these different BTSs when the mobile station is in the SHO region  9 . 
       FIG. 2  of the accompanying drawings shows a situation where the MS  10  is located within the SHO region  9 , and is transmitting such uplink signals that are being received by plural BTSs  4 . According to the IS95 standard, a BTS  4  that receives such an uplink signal from the MS  10  relays the signal to the BSC  6  via a dedicated connection line of the fixed network  5 . At the BSC  6 , one of the relayed signals is selected based on a comparison of the quality of each of the received signals, and the selected signal is relayed to the MSC  7 . This selection is referred to as Selection Diversity. 
     Similarly,  FIG. 3  of the accompanying drawings shows a situation where the MS  10  is located within the SHO region  9  and is receiving downlink signals from plural BTSs  4 . According to the IS95 standard, downlink signals received by the BSC  6  from the MSC  7  are relayed to all BTSs  4  involved in the soft hand-off via respective connection lines of the fixed network  5 , and subsequently transmitted by all the BTSs  4  to the MS  10 . At the MS  10  the multiple signals may be combined, for example, by using maximum ratio combination (MRC), or one of them may be selected based on the signal strength or quality, i.e. using Selection Diversity as for the uplink case. 
     In contrast to, for example, Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) networks, in CDMA networks each BTS  4  transmits at the same frequency. Consequently, careful control of transmission power must be maintained to minimize interference problems. 
     Signals are transmitted as a succession of frames according to the IS95 standard. As  FIG. 4  of the accompanying drawings shows, each frame is of duration  20  ms, and comprises sixteen 1.25 ms time slots. In each time slot several bits of user data and/or control information can be transmitted. 
     Power control of transmissions from the MS  10  to the BTSs  4  (uplink power control) in IS95 is achieved as follows. When a BTS  4  receives a signal from the MS  10  it determines whether a predetermined property of the received signal (for example absolute signal level, signal to noise ratio (SNR), signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), bit error rate (BER) or frame error rate (FER)) exceeds a preselected threshold level. Based on this determination, the BTS  4  instructs the MS  10  either to reduce or to increase its transmission power in the next time slot. 
     For this purpose, two bits in every time slot of a pilot channel (PCH) from the BTS  4  to the MS  10  are allocated for uplink power control (see FIG.  4 ). Both bits have the same value, and accordingly will be referred to hereinafter as the “power control bit” (or PCB) in the singular. The power control bit is assigned a value of zero by the BTS  4  if the MS  10  is required to increase transmission power by 1 dB, and a value of one if the MS  10  is required to decrease transmission power by 1 dB. The BTS  4  is not able to request directly that the MS  10  maintain the same transmission power; only by alternately transmitting ones and zeros in the power control bit is the transmission power maintained at the same level. 
     When the MS  10  is in a SHO region  9 , the MS  10  is required to make a decision on whether to increase or to decrease uplink transmission power based on a plurality of power control bits received respectively from the BTSs  4  involved in the soft hand-off. Consequently, an OR function is performed on all the power control bits. If the result of this OR function is zero then the MS  10  will increase power on uplink transmissions, and if the result is one then the MS  10  will decrease power on uplink transmissions. In this way, uplink transmission power is only increased if all BTSs  4  ask for an increase. 
     Power control of transmissions from the BTS  4  to the MS  10  (downlink power control) in IS95 is achieved as follows. When the MS  10  receives a downlink signal from a BTS  4  (or from each of a plurality of BTSs  4  in soft hand-off operation) via a traffic channel (TCH), the FER of that signal is calculated by the MS  10  this reflects the degree to which the traffic-channel signal has been corrupted by, for example, noise. This FER is then relayed by the MS  10  to the BTS  4  which transmitted the downlink signal concerned, and the BTS  4  uses this FER to decide whether to make any change to its downlink transmission power. 
     The soft hand-off system described above is effective in improving signal transmission between the MS  10  and the network when the MS  10  is located in regions of cell overlap near the boundaries of the individual cells. Signal quality in these regions when using a single BTS  4  may be relatively poor, but by making use of more than one BTS  4  the quality may be substantially improved. 
     However, the IS95 soft hand-off system has the disadvantage of increasing signal traffic (“backhaul”) in the fixed network  5  since it is necessary to transmit signals carrying the same data and/or control information between the BSC  6  and every BTS  4  involved in the soft hand-off for both the uplink and downlink cases described above. This duplication of information is undesirable for two main reasons. Firstly, it leads to more traffic congestion in the fixed network. Secondly, higher costs are experienced by the mobile service provider (and consequently the mobile service user), who may not own the fixed network infrastructure. 
     Therefore it is desirable to provide an improved soft hand-off method capable of affording the usual benefits of soft hand-off while at the same time reducing the load on the fixed network. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a cellular mobile communications network including: a mobile station; a plurality of base transceiver stations (base stations), each for receiving uplink signals from the mobile station; and a base station controller connected to the base transceiver stations for receiving there from such uplink signals; wherein the mobile station is operable, during a soft hand-off operation involving more than one of the base transceiver stations of the network, to include, in one or more such uplink signals transmitted thereby, respective signal measures for all of the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned; and at least one of the base transceiver stations includes a processing unit operable, when that station is involved in such a soft hand-off operation, to determine, based on an assessment of the signal measure(s) for one or more of the other base transceiver stations involved in the soft hand-off operation, not to forward to the said base station controller means such an uplink signal received from the mobile station. 
     According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a mobile station, for use in a cellular mobile communications network, including: a transmitter for transmitting uplink signals to a base transceiver station of the network; and a selection processor connected to the transmitter means and operable, during a soft hand-off operation involving a plurality of such base transceiver stations of the network, to cause the transmitter to include, in one or more of the uplink signals, respective signal measures for all the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each such signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned. 
     According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a base transceiver station, for use in a cellular mobile communications network, including: a receiver for receiving uplink signals from a mobile station of the network, one or more of which uplink signals includes, when the mobile station is engaged in a soft hand-off operation involving the base transceiver station and at least one further base transceiver station of the network, respective signal measures for all the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned; and a soft hand-off controller operable, when the claimed base transceiver station is involved in such a soft hand-off operation, to determine, based on an assessment of the signal measure(s) for one or more of the other base transceiver stations involved in the operation, not to forward to the base station controller of the network such an uplink signal received from the mobile station. 
     According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a soft hand-off control method for use in a cellular mobile communications network, wherein: when a soft hand-off operation involving more than one base transceiver station of the network is being performed, a mobile station of the network includes, in one or more uplink signals transmitted thereby, respective signal measures for all the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned; and in at least one of the involved base transceiver stations, the signal measure(s) of one or more of the other base transceiver stations involved in the operation is/are assessed and a determination is made, based on the assessment, whether or not to forward to a base station controller of the network an uplink signal received from the mobile station. 
     According to a fifth aspect of the present invention there is provided a cellular mobile communications network including: a mobile station; a plurality of base transceiver stations, each for transmitting downlink signals to the mobile station and for receiving uplink signals from the mobile station; and a base station controller connected to the base transceiver stations for applying thereto such downlink signals; wherein the mobile station is operable, during a soft hand-off operation involving more than one of the base transceiver stations of the network, to produce respective signal measures for all the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned; and the network including a base transceiver station selector, operable to employ the produced signal measures to determine which of the base transceiver stations involved in the operation should be used to transmit a subsequent one of the said downlink signals to the mobile station, and to cause that subsequent downlink signal to be transmitted by the base station controller only to the determined base transceiver station(s). 
     According to a sixth aspect of the present invention there is provided a mobile station, for use in a cellular mobile communications network, including: a transmitter for transmitting uplink signals to a base transceiver station of the network; and a selection processing unit connected to the transmitter and operable, during a soft hand-off operation involving a plurality of such base transceiver stations of the network, to produce respective signal measures for all the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each such signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned, and also operable to employ the produced signal measures to determine which of the involved base transceiver stations should be used to transmit a subsequent downlink signal to the mobile station, and to cause the transmitter to include, in such an uplink signal transmitted thereby, a base transceiver station selection message identifying the determined base transceiver station(s). 
     According to a seventh aspect of the present invention there is provided a base station controller, for use in a cellular mobile communications network to apply downlink signals to a plurality of base transceiver stations of the network, including: a receiver for receiving uplink signals from one or more of the base transceiver stations, at least one of which uplink signals includes, when a mobile station is engaged in a soft hand-off operation involving more than one of the base transceiver stations of the network, a base transceiver station selection message identifying which of the involved base transceiver stations should be used to transmit a subsequent one of the downlink signals to the mobile station; and a soft hand-off controller operable to receive the uplink signal including the base transceiver station selection message and to transmit the subsequent downlink signal only to the determined base transceiver station(s) identified in the message. 
     According to an eighth aspect of the present invention there is provided a soft hand-off control method for use in a cellular mobile communications network, wherein: when a soft hand-off operation involving more than one base transceiver station of the network is being performed, a mobile station produces respective signal measures for all the base transceiver stations involved in the operation, each such signal measure serving to indicate the performance of a communications channel between the mobile station and the base transceiver station concerned; and the produced signal measures are employed to determine which of the involved base transceiver stations should be used to transmit a subsequent downlink signal to the mobile station, and the subsequent downlink signal is transmitted by a base station controller of the network only to the determined base transceiver station(s). 
     The signal measures can be any suitable measure of the communications-channel performance between the mobile station and the base transceiver stations, for example signal strength measures (received signal strength in terms of power or amplitude or quality measures (frame error rate, signal-to-interference ratio, etc), or a combination of both strength and quality. 
     In preferred embodiments of the first to fourth aspects of the present invention the signal measures are respective power control bits received by the mobile station from the base transceiver stations involved in the soft hand-off operation. These power control bits indicate whether or not the mobile station is to increase or decrease its uplink transmission power to the base transceiver station and therefore serve conveniently as measures of the uplink channel performance channel between the mobile station and each base transceiver station. 
     In a further embodiment a cellular mobile communications network where a mobile station is capable of receiving a downlink signal from each of a plurality of base stations and transmitting an uplink signal to the plurality of base stations through a wireless channel, the network comprising: a selector unit for producing a measure of signal quality of the downlink signals from the plurality of base stations to the mobile station and for selecting a base station from which the downlink signal shows a preferred signal quality; a transmitter for transmitting the uplink signal indicating the selected base station among the plurality of base stations for subsequent communication with the mobile station; and a processing unit for processing the uplink signal to identify the selected base station, from among the plurality of base stations. 
     In this embodiment of the cellular mobile communications network, the mobile station may include the selector and transmitter. The transmitter may be operable to include an identification of the selected base station in the uplink signal. Further each base station includes the processing unit. The signal quality of the downlink signals from the plurality of base stations to the mobile station is represented by signal strengths of the received downlink signals. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1 , discussed hereinbefore, shows parts of a cellular mobile telecommunication network according to IS95; 
         FIG. 2 , also discussed hereinbefore, shows a schematic view for use in explaining processing of uplink signals in a soft hand-off operation performed by the  FIG. 1  network; 
         FIG. 3 , also discussed hereinbefore, shows a schematic view for use in explaining processing of downlink signals in such a soft hand-off operation; 
         FIG. 4 , also discussed hereinbefore, illustrates the format of a time frame in the  FIG. 1  network; 
         FIG. 5  shows parts of a mobile telecommunication network embodying the present invention; 
         FIG. 6  shows parts of a mobile station embodying to the present invention; 
         FIG. 7  is a flowchart for illustrating uplink processing operations in the  FIG. 6  mobile station; 
         FIG. 8  shows parts of a base transceiver station (base station) embodying the present invention; 
         FIG. 9  is a flowchart for illustrating uplink processing in the  FIG. 8  base transceiver station; 
         FIG. 10  shows an example decision table employed in the uplink processing by the  FIG. 8  base transceiver station; 
         FIG. 11  shows parts of another base transceiver embodying the present invention; 
         FIG. 12  shows a further example decision table employed in the uplink processing by the  FIG. 10  base transceiver station; and 
         FIG. 13  shows parts of a base station controller embodying the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
       FIG. 5  shows parts of a mobile telecommunication network embodying the present invention. In  FIG. 5 , elements that are the same as elements of the  FIG. 1  network described previously have the same reference numerals and an explanation thereof is omitted. 
     The  FIG. 5  network is a wideband CDMA (W-CDMA) network for a proposed new standard for mobile telecommunications, referred to as a universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) or UMTS terrestrial radio access (UTRA). This is generally similar to the IS95-standard network described previously, although certain implementation details are yet to be finalized. Details that are different from IS95 include the frame duration, which is 10 ms, and the time-slot duration which is 625 μs. The overall bit rate is within the range from 8 kbits/s to 2 Mbits/s. Also downlink power control in W-CDMA is closed-loop and is based on the same principles as the uplink power control. 
     In  FIG. 5 , each of three base transceiver stations (BTSS)  20  (BTS 1 , BTS 2  and BTS 3 ) is connected via a fixed network  5  to a base station controller (BSC)  30 , which is in turn connected to a mobile switching center (MSC)  7 . Each BTS  20  serves a cell  8 . A mobile station (MS)  40  is in a soft hand-off (SHO) region  9  and can receive downlink signals from, and transmit uplink signals to, all the BTSs  20  involved in the soft hand-off. 
     The  FIG. 5  network corresponds generally with the  FIG. 1  network, but the MS  40 , BTSs  20  and BSC  30  are constructed and operate differently from the corresponding elements in FIG.  1 . 
       FIG. 6  is a block diagram showing parts of a MS  40  embodying the present invention. An antenna element  42  is connected (e.g. via a duplexer—not shown) to a receiver portion  44  and a transmitter portion  46 . A signal selection information processing portion  48  receives from the receiver portion  44  respective downlink signals DS 1  to DS 3  produced by the three BTSs BTS 1  to BTS 3  involved in the soft hand-off operation. The signal selection information processing portion  48  applies a ranking message RM and a power control message PCM to the transmitter portion  46 . 
       FIG. 7  is a flow chart showing the actions performed by the signal selection processing portion  48  of the MS  40  when performing uplink processing while the MS is in the soft hand-off region  9 . Firstly, in step A 1 , the three BTSs  20  are ranked based on a predetermined property of the respective downlink signals DS 1  to DS 3  that are being received by the MS  40 , for example received signal strength (RSS). Alternatively, the ranking may be based on a “first-come first-served” basis, i.e. on the order in which BTSs  20  became involved in the soft hand-off operation. Alternatively, the ranking could be random. In step A 2  a ranking message RM, indicating the order in which the BTSs are presently ranked, is then sent via a control channel to all BTSs  20 . After the ranking message is sent, processing continues to step A 3 . 
     The loop from steps A 3  to A 6  occurs once for every time slot of the traffic channel (TCH) and its associated control channel (DCCH) in the downlink direction. As was the case for the IS95 uplink power control method described above, every time slot of the TCH/DCCH from BTS  20  to MS  40  contains a power control bit for the purpose of instructing the MS  40  to increase or reduce its uplink transmission power. In step A 3 , such a power control bit is received from each of the three BTSs  40  involved in the soft handoff. 
     In step A 4 , the plurality of power control bits received in step A 3  are arranged into a power control message (PCM) in rank order according to the current BTS ranking decided in step A 1 . Following this, in step A 5 , the PCM is transmitted to all involved BTSs via a control channel. 
     The ranking decided in step A 1  may periodically require updating, for several reasons. Firstly, as the MS  40  moves, a downlink signal may be received from a new BTS or an existing BTS may no longer be able to provide a detectable downlink signal. Secondly, the qualities of the signals received from the BTSs  20  may have changed, e.g. due to fading. Therefore, in step A 6  it is decided whether or not a ranking update is required. Such an update may be carried out periodically at regular time intervals (for example every several hundred milliseconds as in GSM networks), or every frame or even every time slot. Alternatively, the ranking could be updated only when a new BTS is detected or contact with an existing one lost. If an update is required, processing is returned to step A 1 , otherwise processing returns to step A 3  for the start of the next time slot. 
       FIG. 8  is a block diagram showing parts of a BTS  20  embodying the present invention. This BTS  20  is specially adapted to receive and process the ranking message RM sent by the MS  40  in step A 2  of FIG.  7  and the power control message PCM sent by the MS  40  in step A 5 . 
     An antenna element  22  is connected (e.g. via a duplexer—not shown) to a receiver portion  24  and a transmitter portion  26 . A soft hand-off control portion  28  receives an uplink signal US from the receiver portion  24 , and in turn applies the received US (or a signal derived therefrom) to the fixed network  5  for transmission to the BSC  30 . Optionally contained within the soft hand-off control portion  28  is a storage portion  29 . 
     In use of the BTS  20 , the uplink signals sent by the MS  40  when it is in the soft hand-off region  9  include, from time to time, a ranking message RM. The uplink signals US detected by the receiver portion  24  in the BTS  20  are applied to the soft hand-off control portion  28 . When the soft hand-off control portion  28  detects that a ranking message RM is included in one of the uplink signals US received thereby, it processes the ranking message concerned to determine the rank of its BTS within the ranking order determined by the MS in step A 1  described above. 
     In each time slot, the uplink signals US produced by the receiver portion  24  also include a power control message PCM determined by the MS  40  as described above in step A 4  of FIG.  7 . 
     Operation of the soft hand-off control portion  28  in response to the presence of such a PCM in the uplink signal US produced by the receiver portion  24  will now be described with reference to FIG.  9 . 
     It is assumed that, by the time the sequence shown in  FIG. 9  is commenced, a ranking message RM has already been received and processed (as indicated above) by the soft hand-off control portion  28 . 
     In  FIG. 9 , in step B 1  the PCM is received by the soft hand-off control portion and examined. 
     In step B 2 , the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines whether its BTS  20  specified, in its last power control bit (PCB) sent to the subject MS  40 , that the MS  40  should reduce its uplink transmission power (PCB=1). If so, processing proceeds to step B 3 . 
     In step B 3 , the soft hand-off control portion  28  goes on to examine the PCM which includes the respective last PCBs of all of the other BTSs involved in the present soft hand-off operation. If any of those PCBs is 1, this denotes that at least one other BTS requested the subject MS  40  to reduce its uplink transmission power. In this case, processing proceeds to step B 4 . 
     In step B 4 , the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines whether or not, in the order of ranking presently determined by the MS  40 , its BTS is ranked higher than each other BTS that requested the MS to reduce its uplink transmission power. 
     If its BTS is the highest-ranked BTS that has requested a power reduction, processing proceeds to step B 5  in which the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines that its BTS is required to send the uplink signal US received in the current time slot to the BSC  30  via the fixed network  5 . 
     If in step B 4  the soft hand-off control portion  28  determined that another BTS, having a higher rank than its BTS, also asked for a power reduction, processing proceeds to step B 7  in which the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines that it is not required to transmit the uplink signal US received from the mobile station  40  in the current time slot to the BSC  30 . 
     In step B 3 , if the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines that its BTS was the only BTS involved in the soft hand-off operation to ask for a power reduction, processing proceeds to step B 5  in which the uplink signal US for the current time slot is transmitted by the BTS to the BSC  30 . 
     If in step B 2  the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines that it asked the MS  40  for a power increase (i.e. its last PCB was 0), processing proceeds to step B 6 . In step B 6  the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines, by referring to the PCM, whether any other BTS asked for a reduction (i.e. the last PCB specified by that other BTS was 1). If so, the soft hand-off control portion  28  determines that its BTS is not required to transmit the uplink signal US to the BSC  30  in the current time slot and processing proceeds to B 7 . If, on the other hand, no other BTS requested a power reduction (i.e. all BTSs involved in the present soft hand-off operation requested an increase in the MS uplink transmission power), processing proceeds to step B 5  and the US for the current time slot is transmitted by the BTS to the BSC  30 . 
     After step B 5  or B 7  (as the case may be) processing for the current time slot is completed and the soft handoff control portion  28  awaits the next PCM or RM from the MS  40 . 
     As described above with reference to  FIG. 9 , by virtue of its receipt of the PCM, the soft hand-off control portion  28  in each BTS involved in a soft hand-off operation has knowledge of the last power control bit sent to the subject MS  40  by all of the other BTSs, as well as by its own BTS. By comparing these PCBs, the soft hand-off control portion in each BTS can decide whether or not to transfer the uplink signal US received in the current time slot to the BSC, such that, whenever possible, only one of the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off transfers the uplink signal US to the BSC. 
     Based on the received PCBs, the soft hand-off control portion  28  in each “deciding BTS” identifies whether the power reduction/increase requests by the different BTSs fall into one of four different cases. 
     Case 1: If the deciding BTS has asked for a power increase while at least one other BTS has asked for a power reduction, it suggests that at least one other BTS is enjoying a better-quality uplink signal from the MS  40 . Accordingly, this other BTS, rather than the deciding BTS, should send the uplink signal US in the current time slot to the BSC. The deciding BTS therefore decides not to send the uplink signal US. 
     Case 2: If the deciding BTS has requested a power reduction but every other BTS involved in the soft hand-off operation has requested an increase in power, the deciding BTS determines that it is receiving the best-quality signal from the MS and decides to transmit the US in the current time slot to the BSC. 
     Case 3: If the deciding BTS has asked the MS to reduce power, and at least one other BTS has also asked for such a power reduction, the decision as to which BTS is to transfer the US is based on rank. For example, the highest-ranked of the BTSs requesting a power reduction determines that it should transfer the US in the current time slot to the BSC. Thus, case 3 is divided into two sub-cases 3a and 3b. In case 3a the deciding BTS determines that a higher-ranked BTS has asked for a power reduction and so determines that it should not send the US. In case 3b, on the other hand, the deciding BTS determines that it is the highest-ranked of the BTSs requesting a power reduction, and transfers the US to the BSC  30 . 
     Case 4: If all the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation have requested the MS to increase its transmission power, all of the BTSs transfer their respective uplink signals US in the current time slot to the BSC, as in the conventional soft hand-off operation described previously with reference to FIG.  2 . This permits maximum ratio combining (MRC) processing of the different uplink signals at the BSC  30 . 
     As described above, the ability to make decisions at the BTS, rather than at the BSC, facilitates a significant reduction in the fixed-network backhaul for uplink processing in the soft hand-off operation. 
       FIG. 10  shows an example decision table for use in illustrating operation of the soft hand-off control portion  28  during uplink processing. In this example, it is assumed that the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation are ranked as follows: BTS 3  has rank {circle around (1)} (the highest rank); BTS 1  has rank {circle around (2)}; and BTS 2  has rank {circle around (3)} (the lowest rank). 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 10 , the MS  40  arranges the power control bits PCBs for the different BTSs in the power control message PCM in the order of rank of the BTSs. Thus, the first bit in the PCM corresponds to the rank-{circle around (1)} BTS (BTS 3  in this example) the second bit in the PCM corresponds to the rank-{circle around (2)} BTS (BTS 1 ); and the third bit in the PCM corresponds to the rank-{circle around (3)} BTS (BTS 2 ). 
     In this example, it is also assumed that the deciding BTS is BTS 1  (which in this case is the middle-rank BTS). 
     In case 1 above, the PCM=001, indicating that BTS 2  alone has requested a power reduction. Thus, BTS 2  should transmit the uplink signal for the current time slot and BTS 1  determines that it should not transmit the uplink signal. 
     In case 2, the PCM=010, indicating that the deciding BTS 1  alone has requested a power reduction. Accordingly, BTS 1  determines that it should transmit the uplink signal US to the BSC. 
     In case 3a, both BTS 3  and BTS 1  have requested a power reduction, whereas BTS 2  has requested a power increase. In this case, the deciding BTS 1  refers to its rank in the order of ranking determined by the MS and establishes that, as the first PCM bit (corresponding to the higher-rank BTS 3 ) is 1, it (the deciding BTS 1 ) should not transmit the US to the BSC. 
     In case 3b, on the other hand, the PCM=011, indicating that both BTS 1  and BTS 2  have requested a power reduction and BTS 3  has requested a power increase. In this situation, the deciding BTS 1  determines that no BTS of rank higher than it has requested a power reduction (the first PCM bit is 0) and therefore decides to transmit the US to the BSC. 
     Finally, in case 4, the PCM=000 which indicates that all BTSs have requested a power increase. In this case, the deciding BTS 1  determines that it should transmit the US to the BSC. 
     It will be appreciated that it is not essential for the decision-making carried out by the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation to result in only one of the BTSs transmitting the US to the PSC in the current time slot in the cases 1, 2, 3a and 3b. For example, some benefit would still be achieved, in terms of reducing the fixed-network backhaul for uplink processing, as long as at least one BTS decides not to transmit the US in any of the cases 1, 2, 3a or 3b. 
     It will also be appreciated that, in order to avoid erroneous decision making in the BTSS, based for example on temporary phenomena in the uplink signal reception at the BTSs, it may be preferable for the BTSs to make their uplink-signal transmission decisions based on a history of the power control bits sent to the MS. For example, the storage portion  29  included within each soft hand-off control portion  28  could be used to store one or more previous PCMs received by the BTS. Using this PCM history, as stored in the storage portion  29 , each BTS could make a more informed decision as to whether or not to transmit the uplink signal to the BSC. 
     For example, if the history of the PCMs shows that each BTS is sending alternate ones and zeros to the MS (indicating generally that the signal conditions between the MS and each BTS involved in the soft hand-off operations are effectively static), it would be unproductive for the transmitting BTS to continuously “swap around” as a result of the alternating ones and zeros. Such swapping around could be eliminated, for example, by providing each soft hand-off control portion  28  with a facility to identify a “don&#39;t care” reception situation (such as a stream of alternating ones and zeros) for each BTS involved in the soft hand-off operation. In this “don&#39;t care” situation, the soft hand-off control portion  28  could simply decide to apply the last decision it made as to whether or not to transmit the uplink signal to the BSC this time around, so eliminating the swapping around phenomenon. Other “don&#39;t care” situations could also be identified, for example by applying a moving average to the sequence of PCBs received for any given BTS. 
     Similarly, a moving average could be used to make the decision as to whether the reception conditions fall into any of cases 1 to 4 in FIG.  10 . In this case, instead of “1” or “0” in  FIG. 10  representing just the PCB in the current PCM, “1” or “0” could represent the moving average (rounded up or down to 1 or 0) for the BTS concerned over the past (say) 4 PCMs. 
     It will also be understood that it is not necessary for the uplink processing to take place every time slot. It would also be possible for the PCM to be transmitted only once per frame, in which case the decision-making applied by each BTS would be made on a frame-by-frame basis. 
     Furthermore, it would even be possible for the decisions to be made at time intervals other than frames or time slots, for example based on a time interval consistent with the fading characteristics of the RF channels in the network. 
     In the embodiment described above, when two or more BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation have comparably-good uplink channel performances, the BTS used to transmit the uplink signal to the BSC is selected based on the BTS ranking determined by the mobile station alone. However, it is not essential for the ranking of the BTSs to be performed exclusively by the MS and it is possible for the ranking (or part of it) to be performed elsewhere in the network (e.g. in the BSC) based on other criteria. 
     For example, in a preferred embodiment the BTSs may be ranked according to a first ranking determined by the mobile station as described previously. This first ranking may be termed a ranking based on the air interface between the mobile station and the BTSS. The BTSs may also be ranked according to a second ranking determined by the BSC. This second ranking may be based on so-called “backhaul preference”, i.e. an order of preference in which the BTSs should transfer (backhaul) the received uplink signal to the BSC. Factors which influence the backhaul preference include: congestion and availability of the fixed-network communication paths linking the different BTSs to the BSC; the quality of those communication paths; and the cost of using those communications paths. In particular, the fixed network employed to provide the communications paths between the BTSs and the BSC is subject to congestion so that availability problems may arise. Also, some communications paths such as microwave links may offer relatively low quality compared to other types of communication path such as fiber-optic paths. Cost considerations also arise because the fixed-network operator may levy different charges for the use of the different communications paths, including different charges for different bandwidths and different tariffs at different times of use. 
     Accordingly, by ranking the BTSs in accordance with backhaul preference (as well as in accordance with air-interface performance), it is possible to employ a combination of the backhaul preference determined by the second ranking and the air-interface preference determined by the first ranking in suitable cases. 
       FIG. 11  shows parts of a BTS  120  for use in the above-described example. The  FIG. 11  BTS  120  is constituted in basically the same way as the BTS  20  of  FIG. 8 , but includes a modified soft hand-off control portion  128  which receives a first ranking message RM 1  from the mobile station and a second ranking message RM 2  from the BSC via the fixed-network connection path  5 . 
     To this end the BSC in this embodiment further includes a communications path ranking portion (not shown in the drawings) which determines the backhaul preference based on one or more of the factors mentioned above and transmits the second ranking message specifying the determined backhaul preference to the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation. 
     The soft hand-off control portion  128  employs a super decision-matrix when deciding whether or not its BTS  120  should forward an uplink signal US received from the mobile station to the BSC. 
       FIG. 12  shows one example of the application of this super decision matrix. 
     In this example, it is assumed that four BTSs are involved in the soft hand-off operation. In accordance with the first ranking message RM 1  provided to the soft hand-off control portion  128  by the mobile station, the four BTSs are ranked as follows: BTS 1 —rank {circle around (1)}; BTS 2 —rank {circle around (3)}; BTS 3 —rank {circle around (2)}; BTS 4 —rank {circle around (4)}. According to the second ranking message RM 2  provided to the soft hand-off control portion  128  by the BSC, the BTSs are ranked differently as follows: BTS 1 —rank {circle around (4)}; BTS 2 —rank {circle around (2)}; BTS 3 —rank {circle around (3)}; and BTS 4 —rank {circle around (1)}. 
     In this example it is also assumed that the power control bits (arranged in a power control message PCM received from the mobile station) are (in order from BTS 1  to BTS 4 ) 0,1,1,0. This signifies that BTS 2  and BTS 3  are both enjoying comparably-good communications-channel performances. In this case (which corresponds to cases 3a and 3b in  FIG. 10 ) a decision, as to which of these two candidate BTSs BTS 2  and BTS 3  should transmit the received uplink signal in the next time slot to the BSC, is made based on a combination of the two rankings (air-interface ranking provided by the first ranking message RM 1  and backhaul ranking provided by the second ranking message RM 2 ). 
     In each of the BTSs concerned (BTS 2  and BTS 3 ), the soft hand-off control portion  128  determines that it should follow the backhaul ranking preference, which indicates that BTS 2  rather than BTS 3  should be used to transmit the uplink signal to the BSC, even though according to the air-interface ranking, BTS 2  is inferior to BTS 3 . Such a decision is possible because, in this case, the difference in air-interface ranking between the two candidate BTSs BTS 2  and BTS 3  is only one, indicating that BTS 2  is only slightly inferior to BTS 3 . (It might not be desirable to follow the backhaul ranking preference had the two candidate BTSs had been BTSs having very different air-interface rankings, for example BTS 1  and BTS 4 ). 
     Thus, as described above, the decision-making in the soft hand-off control portions of the different BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation can be based on one of the two rankings (air-interface ranking and backhaul ranking) alone or on a combination of both types of ranking. In particular, it will be understood that when the ranking applied by the mobile station (air-interface ranking) is purely random or based on the order of involvement of the BTSs in the soft hand-off operation, it may well be preferable for the air-interface ranking to be overridden completely by the backhaul ranking. 
       FIG. 6  is a block diagram showing parts of a MS  40  embodying the present invention. An antenna element  42  is connected (e.g. via a duplexer—not shown) to a receiver portion  44  and a transmitter portion  46 . A signal selection information processing portion  48  from the receiver portion  44  respective downlink signals DS 1  to DS 3  produced by the three BTSs BTS 1  to BTS 3  involved in the soft hand-off operation. The signal selection information processing portion  48  applies a ranking message RM and a power control message PCM to the transmitter portion  46 . 
     Referring again to  FIG. 6 , to deal with the downlink processing, the signal selection information processing portion  48  is required to perform a further function in addition to the generation of the ranking message RM and power control message PCM as described previously. In this case, as in the previously-described ranking process the signal selection information processing portion  48  again processes the respective downlink signals DS 1  to DS 3  received from the BTSs (BTS 1  to BTS 3 ) involved in the soft hand-off operation, and compares these downlink signals according to a predetermined property (which may be the same property as for the uplink processing case or another property, as desired). In a preferred embodiment, the predetermined property is the received signal strength (RSS), possibly together with the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR). These performance measures are determined for the downlink DCCH. 
     The signal selection information processing portion  48  employs the performance measures to select which of the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation is to be used to transmit the downlink signal to the MS in the next time slot. 
     The signal selection information processing portion  48  may select the BTS that is to transmit the downlink signal in the next time slot based on, for example, the following cases. 
     Case 1: If the RSS (and/or SIR) of a single BTS is higher than each other BTS, that single BTS is selected to transmit the downlink signal in the next time slot. 
     Case 2: If two or more BTSs have comparably-good RSS (and/or SIR), one of them is selected based on an order of ranking (e.g. order of involvement in the soft hand-off operation or random). 
     Case 3: If all the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation fail to meet a prescribed RSS (and/or SIR) threshold, all the BTSs are selected to transmit the downlink signal in the next time slot, so that a MRC operation can be performed at the MS  40  to give the best chance of obtaining a useful signal. 
     After determining which BTS(s) is/are to be used, the signal selection information processing portion  48  transmits a BTS selection message (BSM), identifying the BTS(s) to be used, to all of the BTSs on a control channel. 
     For example, using two bits to provide the BSM, the BSM may be set to “01” to designate BTS 1 ; “10” to designate BTS 2 ; and “11” to designate BTS 3 . “00” denotes that all the BTSs should be used to transmit the downlink signal in the next time slot. 
     Each BTS receives the BSM via the control channel from the MS  40 . One or more of the BTSs then forward the BSM to the BSC  30 . As described previously with reference to  FIGS. 8  to  10 , only one BTS may decide to transmit the uplink signal including the BSM to the BSC, by applying the decision-making strategy described previously for the uplink processing. However, the number of BTSs that forward the BSM to the BSC is irrelevant to this aspect of the invention, and all BTSs could forward the BSM to the BSC. 
       FIG. 13  shows part of a BSC adapted to perform downlink processing in the soft hand-off operation. The BSC  30  includes a control portion  32  and a selector portion  34 . 
     In this example, it is assumed that the connection lines  51  to  53  linking each BTS to the BSC  30  are duplex lines, which carry respective uplink and downlink signals US, and DS between the BTS concerned and the BSC. For example, a first connection line  51  carries respective uplink and downlink signals US 1  and DS 1  between the BTS 1  and the BSC  30 . 
     The selector portion  34  receives at its input a downlink signal DS supplied by the MSC ( 7  in FIG.  5 ). The selector portion  34  has three outputs connected respectively to the connection lines  51  to  53 . 
     The selector portion  34  also has a control input which receives a selection signal SEL. In response to the SEL selection signal the selector portion  34  connects its input to one, or all, of its three outputs. 
     The control portion  32  also has three inputs connected respectively to the connection lines  5   1  to  5   3  for receiving the uplink signals US 1  to US 3  from BTS 1  to BTS 3  respectively. The control portion applies the selection signal SEL to the selector portion  34 . 
     In operation of the BSC shown in  FIG. 13 , in each time slot of the uplink signal the control portion  32  receives one or more of the three uplink signals US 1  to US 3  from the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation. When the BSM supplied by the MS  40  is detected within a received uplink signal US 1 , US 2  or US 3 , the control portion  32  examines the BSM and determines therefrom which of the BTSs is to be used to transmit the downlink signal in the next time slot to the MS  40 . 
     If the BSM designates a single BTS, the control portion  32  sets the selection signal SEL such that the selector portion  34  supplies the downlink signal DS just to that one of the connection lines  5   1  to  5   3  connecting the BSC  30  to the designated BTS. If, on the other hand, all BTSs are designated by the BSM, the selection signal SEL is set so that the downlink signal DS received from the MSC  7  is supplied to all of the connection lines  5   1  to  5   3 . 
     It will be appreciated that it is not necessary for the downlink processing to be performed on a time slot-by-time slot basis. It could be performed on a frame-by-frame basis or the BTS selection could be made at some other suitable time interval. 
     It would also be possible for the signal selection information processing portion  48  ( FIG. 6 ) to include its own storage portion (similar to the storage portion  29  in  FIG. 8 ) enabling it to store a past history of the RSS (and/or SIR) measures for the different BTSs currently involved in the soft hand-off operation. In this case, as described previously in relation to the uplink processing, it would be possible for the MS to employ more sophisticated decision-making in relation to the BTS selection so as to avoid undesirable effects caused by temporary reception phenomena or other problems caused by too frequent-changing of the BTS selection. 
     It is not necessary for the mobile station to carry out the comparison of the signal measures for the different downlink signals and make the determination of the BTS to be used to transmit the downlink signal. The comparison and BTS determination could be carried out in the BSC; in this case instead of transmitting the BSM to the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off operation, the mobile station could transmit the downlink signal measures themselves (in some suitable form). These measures would then be delivered in the usual way to the BSC, enabling it to compare them and then make the BTS determination. 
     Although the present invention has been described above in relation to the proposed European wideband CDMA system (UTRA) it will be appreciated that it can also be applied to a system otherwise in accordance with the IS95 standard. It would also be possible to apply the invention in other cellular networks not using CDMA, for example networks using one or more of the following: multiple-access techniques: time-division multiple access (TDMA), wavelength-division multiple access (WDMA), frequency-division multiple access (FDMA) and space-division multiple access (SDMA).