Abstract:
Technique and structures for camouflaging an integrated circuit structure. The integrated circuit structure is formed by a plurality of layers of material having controlled outlines and controlled thicknesses. A layer of dielectric material of a controlled thickness is disposed among said plurality of layers to thereby render the integrated circuit structure intentionally inoperable.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]    This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/378,155 filed May 14, 2002, which application is incorporated herein by reference.  
       TECHNICAL FIELD  
       [0002]    The present invention relates to integrated circuits and semiconductor devices (ICs) in general and their methods of manufacture wherein the integrated circuits and semiconductor devices employ camouflaging techniques which make it difficult for a reverse engineer to discern how the semiconductor device is manufactured.  
       RELATED ART  
       [0003]    The present invention is related to the following U.S. Patents, all of which were filed by the same inventors:  
         [0004]    (1) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,866,933; 5,973,375 and 6,294,816 teach how transistors in a CMOS circuit are connected by implanted (and therefore hidden and buried) lines between the transistors by modifying the p+ and n+ source/drain masks. These implanted interconnections are used to make 3-input AND and 3-input OR circuits look substantially identical to the reverse engineer. Also, buried interconnects force the reverse engineer to examine the IC in greater depth to try to figure out the connectivity between transistors and hence their function.  
         [0005]    (2) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846; 5,930,663 and 6,064,110 teach a further modification in the source/drain implant masks so that the implanted connecting lines between transistors have a gap therein, the gap having a length approximating the minimum feature size of the CMOS technology being used. If this gap is “filled” with one kind of implant, the line conducts; but if it is “filled” with another kind of implant, the line does not conduct. The intentional gaps are called “channel blocks.” The reverse engineer is forced to determine connectivity on the basis of resolving the implant type at the minimum feature size of the CMOS process being used.  
         [0006]    (3) U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,762 teaches a method and an apparatus for protecting semiconductor integrated circuits from reverse engineering. Semiconductor active areas are formed on a substrate, and a silicide layer is formed over at least one active area of the semiconductor active areas and over a selected substrate area for interconnecting at least one active area with another area through the silicide area formed on the selected substrate area. 
     
    
     
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0007]    The creation of complex integrated circuits and semiconductor devices can be a very expensive undertaking given the large number of hours of sophisticated engineering talent involved in designing such devices. Additionally, integrated circuits can include read only memories and/or EEPROMs into which software, in the form of firmware, is encoded. Additionally, integrated circuits are often used in applications involving the encryption of information, and therefore in order to keep such information confidential, it can be desirable to keep such devices from being reverse engineered. Thus, there can be a variety of reasons for protecting integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from being reverse engineered.  
           [0008]    In order to keep the reverse engineer at bay, different techniques are known in the art to make integrated circuits more difficult to reverse engineer. One technique is to make the connections between transistors difficult to determine forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor (in particular each CMOS transistor pair for CMOS devices). Bit camouflaging the connections between transistors, the reverse engineer is unable to use automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques in order to reverse engineer an integrated circuit. Since integrated circuits can have hundreds of thousands or even millions of transistors, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor in a device can effectively frustrate the reverse engineer&#39;s ability to reverse engineer the device successfully.  
           [0009]    The prior art techniques mentioned above, if successful, will force the reverse engineer to study the metal connections in an attempt to figure out the boundaries of standard circuits and their function. For example, gate connections may utilize the polysilicon layer (typically the first polysilicon layer in a process having two or more polysilicon layers) and the reverse engineer, knowing that such gate contacts are typically the input to transistors and hence to a standard circuit, would look for these contacts. Also, the source and drain contacts are made to the substrate via metal interconnect. One way in which the reverse engineer might work would be to look for cell boundaries by means of looking for silicon-to-gate poly metal lines as these suggest the possibilities for contacts between the output (the drain contact) from one transistor cell into the input (the gate contact) of a next transistor cell. If this can be done, the reverse engineer can define cell boundaries by these silicon-gate poly lines. Then by noting the cell boundaries, the reverse engineer can find the cell characteristics (for example, size and number of transistors) and from this make reasonable assumptions as to the cell&#39;s function. This information can then be stored in a database for automatic classification of other similar cells.  
           [0010]    It is an object of this invention to make reverse engineering even more difficult and, in particular, to force the reverse engineer to study the possible silicon-to-gate poly lines very carefully, to see if they are in fact real. It is believed that this will make the reverse engineer&#39;s efforts all the more difficult by making it very time consuming in order to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention and perhaps making it exceedingly impractical, if not impossible, to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention.  
           [0011]    The Inventors named herein have previously filed Patent Applications and have received Patents relating to the camouflage of integrated circuit devices in order to make it more difficult to reverse engineer them as discussed above. The present invention can often be used harmoniously with the techniques disclosed in these prior United States Patents to further confuse the reverse engineer.  
           [0012]    In modern semiconductor manufacturing processes, particularly where the feature size is less than 0.5 micrometers, a silicide layer is typically used to improve conductivity. FIG. 1 is a plan view of a semiconductor device. FIGS. 1A, 1B and  1 C are cross-sectional views of the semiconductor device shown in plan view in FIG. 1. A typical drain or source contact is shown in FIG. 1A, while a typical gate contact is shown in FIG. 1B. The drain, source and gate regions are formed on a semiconductor substrate, such as silicon substrate  10 , and have active regions  12 ,  16 ,  18 , as shown in FIG. 1C, formed therein, typically by implantation of a suitable dopant. Field oxide (FOX)  20  is used to help isolate one semiconductor device from another, in the usual fashion. The drain contact structure, as shown in FIG. 1A, has a conventional silicide layer  26 - 1  formed over its active region  18 . A refractive metal contact  30  and plug  31  combination is formed on the silicide layer  26 - 1 . Silicide layer  26 - 1  provides a surface for a refractive metal gate contact  30  and plug  31  combination, the metal contact frequently including a plug of refractive metal  31  which extends through an opening in a dielectric layer  29 , which may be deposited SiO 2 . The refractive metal gate contact  30  and metal plug  31  combination makes contact with the silicide layer  26 - 1 . The source structure is similar to the drain structure depicted in FIG. 1A, where the active region  18  is replaced by active region  16 .  
           [0013]    The gate structure, as shown in FIG. 1B, has a relatively thin gate oxide layer  22  which is covered by a layer of polysilicon  24 - 1 , which in turn is covered by a silicide layer  26 - 1  (suicide layer  26 - 1  is traditionally referred to as a “salicide” layer when used with a polysilicon layer  24 - 1  as is the case here) Silicide layer  26 - 1  provides a surface for a refractive metail gale contact  30  the metal contact frequently including a plug of refractive metal  31  which extends through an opening in a dielectric layer  29 , which may be deposited SiO 2 . The metal plug  31  makes contact with the silicide layer  26 - 1 .  
           [0014]    [0014]FIG. 1C is a cross-sectional view through the active areas  16 ,  18  and gate area  12  of a semiconductor device. The sidewall spacers  21  provide for the separation of the gate area  12  and active regions  16 ,  18  during processing. The remaining details of FIG. 1C are the same as those found in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Those skilled in the art will appreciate other fabrication details are omitted from the drawings since their use is well known in the art.  
           [0015]    It is also common in the prior art to use a double-polysilicon CMOS fabrication process. Such a process is currently used by many commercial IC chip manufacturers, especially smart card chip manufacturers. The double-polysilicon (or simply double poly) process can be used to make a variety of devices, including CMOS transistor pairs, floating gate structures and even bipolar transistors. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,784,966 to Chen. A double-polysilicon CMOS process also supports the manufacture of EEPROMs, which are commonly used in applications such as smart card chips and the like.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0016]    In one aspect, the present invention provides a camouflaged circuit structure, comprising: a semiconductor substrate; an implanted region in said substrate; a metal layer which is associated with said implanted region and which appears, in plan view, to be electrically coupled to said implanted region; and a dielectric layer disposed between said implanted region and said metal layer to thereby insulate said metal layer from said implanted region, the dielectric layer having dimensions such that when viewed in said plan view, said dielectric layer is at least partially hidden by a feature of the circuit structure.  
           [0017]    Another aspect of the present invention provides a camouflaged circuit structure, comprising: a semiconductor substrate; an active region in said substrate; a conductive layer which is associated with said active region and which appears, in plan view, to be arranged to influence conduction through said active region by an application of control voltages thereto; a control electrode which is associated with said conductive layer and which appears, in plan view, to be electrically connected to said conductive layer; and at least one dielectric layer disposed between said conductive layer and said control electrode for intentionally keeping said conductive layer from influencing conduction through said active region in response to an application of control voltages to said control electrode.  
           [0018]    Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of deterring a reverse engineer comprising the steps of: associating at least one conductive contact with an active area; and preventing electrical conduction between said at least one conductive contact and said active area by inserting an intervening insulating layer.  
           [0019]    Another aspect of the present invention provides a pseudo-transistor comprising: an active region disposed in a substrate; an insulating, non-electrically conductive layer disposed over at least a portion of said active region; a polysilicon layer disposed over at least a portion of said insulating, non-electrically conductive layer disposed over at least a portion of said active region, the insulating, non-electrically conductive layer electrically isolating the polysilicon layer from the active region; and a metal layer in electrical communication with said polysilicon layer and electrically isolated from the active region, the insulating, non-electrically conductive layer, the polysilicon layer and the the metal layer each having dimensions such that when viewed in a plan view, the metal layer appears to be in electrical communication with the active region.  
           [0020]    Another aspect of the present invention provides a non-operational semiconductor gate contact comprising: a metal layer; a first polysilicon layer; a second polysilicon layer disposed at least between said metal layer and said first polysilicon layer; and an insulating, non-conductive layer disposed at least between said first polysilicon layer and said second polysilicon layer.  
           [0021]    Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for manufacturing a pseudo-transistor comprising the steps of: implanting an active region in a substrate; placing a dielectric layer over at least a portion of said active region; and disposing a metal layer over said dielectric layer, wherein said dielectric layer prevents an electrical connection between said active region and said metal layer.  
           [0022]    Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for confusing a reverse engineer comprising the steps of: implanting an active region in a substrate; associating a conductive layer with said active region; disposing at a dielectric layer over said conductive layer; and providing a control electrode, wherein said dielectric layer prevents said conductive layer from influencing conduction through said active region in response to an application of control voltages to said control electrode.  
           [0023]    The present invention is compatible with the standard double-polysilicon CMOS process in which at least one of the polysilicon layers (typically the second or upper polysilicon layer) is deposited after active area implants, i.e., after the source and drain implants. The prior art process is modified by placing a dielectric layer over an apparent contact area so as to defeat what would otherwise appear as a standard metal contact. This can be done in at least the following two contexts:  
           [0024]    (1) The second polysilicon area and oxide combination are deposited over a source or drain contact region to which a metal contact will be subsequently applied. In this way, the metal contact is not electrically connected to the underlying source or drain region, and therefore that which appears to be a contact does not function as one. However, to the reverse engineer, the metal contact appears to be a normal metal contact and therefore the reverse engineer will assume that the transistor associated therewith is operable.  
           [0025]    (2) The second polysilicon area and oxide combination are deposited over a self aligned polysilicon gate layer rendering the subsequently deposited metal gate non-functional.  
           [0026]    Thus, a structure that appears to the reverse engineer to be a transistor (herein referred to as a pseudo-transistor) can be made to have a different function within a circuit than it appears to have by (i) rendering its gate non-functional, or (ii) rendering its drain contact non-functional or (iii) rendering its source contact non-functional or (iv) any combination of the foregoing. Due to the presence of the pseudo-transistors, the reverse engineer is apt to assume that each pseudo-transistor is a proper transistor when trying to copy the original integrated circuit, causing their copied circuit to function incorrectly. The true functionality of the circuit is hidden in the circuits in which the pseudo-transistors are used. Of course, if hundreds or thousands of pseudo-transistors are used in a complex integrated circuit having perhaps millions of transistors, and the reverse engineer interprets the pseudo-transistor to be a functional transistor, the reverse engineer ends up not only with a device that does not work, but the daunting task of trying to figure out what went wrong in the assumptions that he or she made in analyzing the chip to be reverse engineered and figuring out where he or she was mislead. This additional effort, if undertaken, forces the reverse engineer to spend additional time trying to determine how the chip in question is really configured.  
           [0027]    By careful study, the reverse engineer may detect the techniques disclosed herein which render the pseudo-transistors inoperable. However, it is believed that the techniques which will be needed to detect the use of the present invention will be sufficiently time consuming to deter the reverse engineer. A complex integrated circuit may comprise millions of CMOS transistors and if the reverse engineer must carefully analyze each CMOS transistor pair in order to determine whether or not the present invention has been used to disguise each CMOS transistor, the effort involved in reverse engineering such an integrated circuit will be tremendous.  
           [0028]    The disclosed techniques can be utilized to render a circuit non-functional. However, it is believed that the disclosed techniques are better used in applications where, instead of rendering a circuit non-functional, the circuit still functions, but functions in an unintended way. The reverse engineer ends up with a copy which “seems” to work, but does not really work to produce a useful or desired result.  
           [0029]    Note that the present invention involving pseudo-transistors might only be used on one in a thousand instances on the chip in question, but the reverse engineer will have to look very carefully at each transistor fully knowing that for each transistor he or she sees, there is a very low likelihood that it has been modified by the present invention. The reverse engineer will be faced with having to find the proverbial needle in a haystack. 
       
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0030]    [0030]FIG. 1 is a plan view of a semiconductor device found in FIGS. 1A, 1B and  1 C;  
         [0031]    [0031]FIGS. 1A, 1B and  1 C are side elevational views of a metal contact for an active area (see FIG. 1A) and a metal contact for a gate region (see FIG. 1B) and cross section through the active areas and gate area (see FIG. 1C);  
         [0032]    [0032]FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view through a gate region with conventional double poly processing;  
         [0033]    [0033]FIG. 3 is a plan view of a semiconductor device which is also depicted in FIGS. 3A, 3B and  3 C;  
         [0034]    [0034]FIG. 3A is a side-sectional view along line  3 A- 3 A depicted in FIG. 3 through a drain or source contact of a CMOS transistor employing a silicide/salicide layer, wherein a layer of oxide is utilized to render the associated contact inoperable;  
         [0035]    [0035]FIG. 3B is a side-sectional view along line  3 B- 3 B depicted in FIG. 3 which is adjacent the gate region and shows how the silicide/salicide layer and the layer of oxide adjacent the gate region render the gate contact inoperable; and  
         [0036]    [0036]FIG. 3C is a cross-sectional view along line  3 C- 3 C depicted in FIG. 3 depicting the layers through the source, gate and drain regions. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0037]    [0037]FIG. 3 is a plan view of the semiconductor device which appears to be a field effect transistor (FET). However, as can be seen from the cross-sectional views depicted in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and  3 C the semiconductor device is a pseudo-transistor. FIG. 3A depicts how the contact depicted in FIG. 1A can be intentionally “broken” by the present invention to form the pseudo-transistor. Similarly, FIG. 3B shows how the gate structure depicted in FIG. 1B can be intentionally “broken” by the present invention to form the pseudo-transistor. FIG. 3C is a cross-sectional of both the gate region  12  and active regions  16 ,  18 , the contact to the active region  18  being intentionally “broken” by the present invention to form the pseudo-transistor. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the although these figures depict enhancement mode devices, the pseudo-transistor may also be a depletion mode device. Where the gate, source or drain contacts are intentionally “broken” by the present invention. In the case of a depletion mode transistor, if the gate contact is “broken”. the device will be “ON” when a nominal voltage is applied to the control electrode. If the source or drain contact is “broken”, the pseudo-depletion mode transistor will essentially be “OFF” for a nominal voltage applied to the control electrode.  
         [0038]    [0038]FIG. 2 shows typical process dimensions used in modern double poly semiconductor processing. The double-poly process preferably includes two layers of polysilicon  24 - 1 ,  24 - 2  and may also have two layers of salicide  26 - 1 ,  26 - 2 . The thicknesses represented are preferable thicknesses. Double polysilicon processing may be used to arrive at the structures shown in FIGS. 3, 3A,  3 B and  3 C. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the structures shown in FIGS. 3, 3A,  3 B and  3 C are not limited to the thickness dimensions shown in FIG. 2.  
         [0039]    [0039]FIG. 3 shows a pseudo-FET transistor in plan view, but those skilled in the art will appreciate that the metal contact of a bipolar transistor is very similar to the source/drain contact depicted. FIG. 3A is a side elevation view of the pseudo-transistor in connection with what appears to the reverse engineer (viewing from the top, see FIG. 3) as an active area metal layer  30 ,  31  of a CMOS FET. Alternatively, the device could be a vertical bipolar transistor in which case the metal layer  30 ,  31  that the reverse engineer sees could be an emitter contact. As depicted in FIG. 3A, for a CMOS structure, an active region  18  may be formed in a conventional manner using field oxide  20  as the region boundary. The active region  18  is implanted through gate oxide  22  (see FIG. 3C), which is later stripped away from over the active regions and optionally replaced with the silicide metal which is then sintered, producing a silicide layer  26 - 1 . Next, a dielectric layer  28  is deposited. In the preferred embodiment, the dielectric layer is a silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) layer  28 . Additionally, a polysilicon layer  24 - 2  may be deposited over the silicon dioxide layer  28 . Polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is preferably the second polysilicon layer in a double polysilicon process. Optional silicide layer  26 - 2  is then formed over the polysilicon layer  24 - 2 . A second silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) layer  29  is deposited and etched to allow a metal layer, including metal plug  31  and metal contact  30  to be formed over the optional silicide layer  26 - 2  or in contact with polysilicon layer  24 - 2  (if no suicide layer  26 - 2  is utilized). The oxide layer  28  and oxide layer  29  are preferably comprised of the same material (possibly with different densities) and as such are indistinguishable from each other to the reverse engineer when placed on top of each other.  
         [0040]    Different masks are used in the formation of the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  and the metal plug  31 . In order to maintain alignment between the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  and the metal plug  31 , a cross-section of the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  in a direction parallel to the major surface  11  of the semiconductor substrate  10  is preferably designed to be essentially the same size, within process alignment tolerances, as a cross-section of the metal plug  31  taken in the same direction. As such, the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is at least partially hidden by the metal plug  31 . In FIGS. 3, 3A,  3 B and  3 C, the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is depicted as being much larger than metal plug  31 ; however, these figures are exaggerated simply for clarity. Preferably, the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is designed to ensure that a cross-section of metal plug  31  is aligned with a cross-section of polysilicon layer  24 - 2 , or a cross-section of optional silicide layer  26 - 2  if used, yet small enough to be very difficult to view under a microscope. Further, the bottom of metal plug  31  is preferably completely in contact with the polysilicon layer  24 - 2 , or optional silicide layer  26 - 2  if used. One skilled in the art will appreciate process alignment tolerances vary by process. For example, for a 0.5 μm process, typical alignment tolerances are in the range from 0.1 μm to 0.15 μm.  
         [0041]    The reverse engineer cannot easily obtain an elevation view such as those shown in FIGS. 2, 3A,  3 B or  3 C. In fact, the typical manner in which the reverse engineer would obtain the elevation views would be via individual cross-sectional scanning electron micrographs taken at each possible contact or non-contact. The procedure of taking micrographs at each possible contact or non-contact is prohibitively time consuming and expensive. The reverse engineer, when looking from the top, will see the top of the metal contact  30 , see FIG. 3. The contact-defeating layer of oxide  28  with polysilicon layer  24 - 2  and optional suicide layer  26 - 2  will be at least partially hidden by a feature of the circuit structure, i.e. metal contact  30  and metal plug  31 .  
         [0042]    The reverse engineering process usually, involves delayering the semiconductor device to remove the layers down to the silicon substrate  10 , and then viewing the semiconductor device from a direction normal to the major surface  11  of the silicon substrate  10 . During this process, the reverse engineer will remove the traces of the oxide layer  28  which is used in the present invention to disable the contact.  
         [0043]    Further, the reverse engineer may chose a more costly method of removing only the metal contact  30  from the semiconductor area. A cross-section of polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is preferably essentially the same size, within process alignment tolerances, as a cross-section of metal plug  31 . The oxide layers  28 ,  29  are practically transparent, and the thicknesses of the optional silicide layer  26 - 2  and the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  are small. A typical thickness of the optional silicide layer  26 - 2  is 100-200 angstroms, and a typical thickness of the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is 2500-3500 angstroms. Thus, the reverse engineer when viewing the device from the top will assume that the metal plug  31  is in contact with the silicide layer  26 - 1 , thereby assuming incorrectly that the device is operable. Further, when the optional silicide layer  26 - 2  is used, the reverse engineer may be further confused when looking at the device once the metal plug  31  has been removed. Upon viewing the shiny reside left by the suicide layer  26 - 2 , the reverse engineer will incorrectly assume that the shiny reside is left over by the metal plug  31 . Thus, the reverse engineer will again incorrectly assume that the contact was operational.  
         [0044]    [0044]FIG. 3B is a side elevation view of a gate contact of the psuedo-transistor of FIG. 3. As can be seen from FIG. 3, the view of FIG. 3B, which is taken along section line  3 B- 3 B, is through a gate oxide layer  22 , through a first polysilicon layer  24 - 1  and through a first a silicide layer  26 - 1  which are formed over the field oxide region  20  and gate region  12  in the semiconductor substrate  10  (typically silicon) between active regions  16  and  18  (see FIG. 3C). The first polysilicon layer  24 - 1  would act as a conductive layer which influences conduction through the gate region  12  by an application of control voltages, if this device functioned normally. Active regions  16 ,  18  and  12 , gate oxide  22 , the first polysilicon layer  24 - 1 , and the first suicide layer  26 - 1  are formed using conventional processing techniques. For a normally functioning device, a control electrode formed by metal layer  30 ,  31  would be in contact with the layer of silicide layer  26 - 1  over field oxide  20 . The silicide layer  26 - 1  would then act as a control layer for a normally functioning device. To form a pseudo-transistor, at least one dielectric layer, for example a layer of oxide  28 , is deposited. Next, a second polysilicon layer  24 - 2  and an optional second silicide layer  26 - 2  are deposited over the oxide layer  28 . The layer of silicide  26 - 2  depicted between the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  and metal plug  31  may be omitted in some fabrication processes, since some double-polysilicon processing techniques utilize only one layer of silicide (when such processing techniques are used only one layer of silicide  26 - 1  or  26 - 2  would be used). In either case, the normal functioning of the gate is inhibited by the layer of oxide  28 .  
         [0045]    A cross-section of the second polysilicon layer  24 - 2  in a direction parallel to the normal surface  11  of the semiconductor substrate  10  is preferably essentially the same size, within process alignment tolerances, as a cross-section of metal plug  31  taken in the same direction. As such, the second polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is partially hidden by metal plug  31 . In FIGS. 3, 3A,  3 B and  3 C, the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is depicted as being much larger than metal plug  31 ; however, these figures are exaggerated simply for clarity. Preferably, the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  is designed to ensure that the cross-section of metal plug  31  is completely aligned with the cross-section of polysilicon layer  24 - 2 , or a cross-section of optional silicide layer  26 - 2  if used, yet small enough to be very difficult to view under a microscope. Further, the bottom of metal plug  31  is preferably completely in contact with the polysilicon layer  24 - 2 , or the optional silicide layer  262  if used. One skilled in the art will appreciate process alignment tolerances vary by process. For example, for a 0.5 μm process, typical alignment tolerances are in the range from 0.1 μm to 0.15 μm.  
         [0046]    The added oxide layer  28  and polysilicon layer  24 - 2  are placed such that they occur at the normal place for the metal to polysilicon contact to occur as seen from a plan view. The placement provides for the metal layer  30 ,  31  to at least partially hide the added oxide layer  28  and/or polysilicon layer  24 - 2 , so that the layout appears normal to the reverse engineer. The reverse engineer will etch off the metal layer  30 ,  31  and see the polysilicon layer  24 - 2  and possible reside from optional silicide layer  26 - 2 , if used. Upon seeing the shiny reside from optional silicide layer  26 - 2  the reverse engineer may incorrectly assume that the shiny reside is from the metal plug  31 . A reverse engineer would not have any reason to believe that the contact was not being made to polysilicon layer  24 - 1  or optional silicide layer  26 - 1 . Further, when optional suicide layer  26 - 2  is not used, the small thicknesses of oxide layer  28  and polysilicon layer  26 - 2  are not clearly seen when viewing the contact from a direction normal to the major surface  11  of the silicon substrate  10 , and thus the reverse engineer will conclude he or she is seeing a normal, functional polysilicon gate FET transistor.  
         [0047]    In use, the reverse engineering protection techniques of FIG. 3A, FIG. 3B and/or FIG. 3C need only be used sparingly, but are preferably used in combination with other reverse engineering techniques such as those discussed above under the subtitle “Related Art.” The basic object of these related techniques and the techniques disclosed herein is to make it so time consuming to figure out how a circuit is implemented (so that it can be successfully replicated), that the reverse engineer is thwarted in his or her endeavors. Thus, for the many thousands of devices in a modern IC, only a small fraction of those will employ the pseudo-transistors described herein and depicted in FIGS. 3A, 3B and  3 C to camouflage the circuit. Therefore, unless the reverse engineer is able to determine these pseudo-transistors, the resulting circuit determined by the reverse engineer will be incorrect.  
         [0048]    Additionally, the pseudo-transistors are preferably used not to completely disable a multiple transistor circuit in which they are used, but rather to cause the circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive manner. For example, what appears to be an OR gate to the reverse engineer might really function as an AND gate. Or what appears as an inverting input might really be non-inverting. The possibilities are almost endless and are almost sure to cause the reverse engineer so much grief that he or she gives up as opposed to pressing forward to discover how to reverse engineer the integrated circuit device on which these techniques are utilized.  
         [0049]    Also, when the reverse engineer etches away the metal  30 ,  31 , he or she should preferably “see” the normally expected layer whether or not a contact is blocked according to the present invention. Thus, if the reverse engineer expects to see suicide after etching away metal, that is what he or she should see even when the contact is blocked. If he or she expects to see polysilicon after etching away metal, that is what he or she should see even when the contact is blocked.  
         [0050]    One skilled in the art will appreciate that other dielectric materials, such as silicon nitride Si 3 N 4 , may be used in the place of silicon dioxide. One skilled in the art will also appreciate that the silicide layers  26 - 1  and  26 - 2  are not required to be placed in the gate region. In modern semiconductor manufacturing processes, particularly where the feature size is less than 0.5 micrometers, a silicide layer is typically used to improve conductivity. However, the present invention is directed toward giving the appearance of a functioning transistor device to the reverse engineer where the contact is actually disabled. Since conductivity is not an issue, and in fact conductivity is prevented, silicide layers  26 - 1  and  26 - 2  are not required to be placed in the gate region when the contact is to be broken. However, silicide layers  26 - 1  and  26 - 2  may be placed over the gate region to simplify the number of masks required and thus the semiconductor manufacturing process and to further mislead the reverse engineer by the shiny residue which it leaves behind during some reverse engineering processes.  
         [0051]    Having described the invention in connection with certain preferred embodiments thereof, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as is specifically required by the appended claims.