Abstract:
A perpendicular write head includes a main pole comprising a Durimide/Alumina hard mask formed over a laminate layer process to form the main pole without using a liftoff or chemical mechanical polishing process, thereby avoiding rounding corners of the pole, the main pole being controlled in shape for improved control of critical dimension of track width and angle of the bevel to avoid undesirable adjacent track writing.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
   This application is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/836,867 filed on Apr. 30, 2004 and entitled “HIGH MILLING RESISTANCE WRITE POLE FABRICATION FOR PERPENDICULAR RECORDING,” the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full and related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/195,227, filed on Aug. 1, 2005 and entitled “BILAYER TRAILING SHIELD GAP FOR PERPENDICULAR HEAD”, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference, as though set forth in full, and related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/195,222, filed on Aug. 1, 2005 and entitled “PERPENDICULAR HEAD WITH TRAILING SHIELD AND RHODIUM GAP PROCESS”, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference, as though set forth in full. 

   FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
   This invention relates generally to the field of perpendicular magnetic recording (or write) heads and more particularly, to a main pole within the write head being made of laminated magnetic material, such as a hybrid Durimide/alumina mask for controlling beveling of the pole and track width thereof to increase performance. 
   DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART 
   As the recording density of magnetic hard drives (or disc drives) increases, a physical limitation is experienced using longitudinal recording systems partly due to thermal relaxation known as super-paramagnetism. That is, the density requirements for meeting today&#39;s storage needs are simply not attainable with longitudinal recording systems. To provide further insight into this problem, it is anticipated that longitudinal recording systems will lose popularity as storage capacities in excess of about 150 Gigabytes-per-square-inches become a requirement. 
   These and other factors have lead to the development and expected launch of perpendicular recording heads or write heads. Perpendicular recording is promising in pushing the recording density beyond the limit of longitudinal recording. 
   Accordingly, perpendicular recording potentially supports much higher linear density than longitudinal recording due to lower demagnetizing fields in recorded bits. A magnetic recording head for perpendicular writing generally includes two portions, a writer portion for writing or programming magnetically-encoded information on a magnetic media or disc and a reader portion for reading or retrieving the stored information from the media. 
   The writer of the magnetic recording head for perpendicular recording typically includes a main pole and a return pole which are magnetically separated from each other at an air bearing surface (ABS) of the writer by a nonmagnetic gap layer, and which are magnetically connected to each other at a back gap closure (yoke). This structure is a single-pole write head because while a main pole and return pole are referred thereto, the return pole is not physically a pole, rather, it serves to close the loop with the main pole and the soft under layer of the media to form a magnetic flux circuit. 
   Positioned at least partially between the main and return poles are one or more layers of conductive coils encapsulated by insulation layers. The ABS is the surface of the magnetic head immediately adjacent to the perpendicular medium. 
   To write data to the magnetic medium, an electrical current is caused to flow through the conductive coil, thereby inducing a magnetic field across the gap between the main and return poles. By reversing the polarity of the current through the coil, the polarity of the data written to the magnetic media is also reversed. 
   The main and return poles are generally made of a soft magnetic material. The main pole generates magnetic field in the media during recording when the write current is applied to the coil. A magnetic moment of the main pole should be oriented along an easy axis parallel to the ABS when the main pole is in a quiescent state, namely without a write current field from the write coil. 
   With the advent of perpendicular recording heads, density has been greatly increased, as discussed hereinabove, which has lead to a greater need for accurate recording of data onto the desired track. That is, writing to adjacent tracks is highly undesirable because it causes corruption of data on adjacent tracks. 
   In the recording head, namely the slider, the main and return poles are separated by the gap layer, causing writing of data onto tracks. The main pole is generally beveled in shape in an effort to reduce adjacent track writing. Controlling the track width so as to better line up with the track to be written thereto needs further improvement, as does controlling the angle of the bevel of the trapezoidal shape design of the main pole. 
   It is vital for the corners of the trapezoidal-shaped main pole to be straight rather than rounded, which often is experienced during manufacturing of the main pole. Such corner rounding generally results in the magnetic field that is induced onto the disc to be curved rather than straight. This effect adversely impacts system performance by degrading accurate recording of data onto the disc, as well as, unnecessarily higher power consumption. 
   One reason for such corner rounding is the use of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) processing for cleaning or polishing the surface of the main pole after patterning the latter. Eliminating such a step, eliminates or at a minimum, reduces the problem associated with corner-rounding. More specifically, in current manufacturing techniques, processes of ion milling patterning with durimide and CMP liftoff are performed. The problem with these techniques is that the CMP liftoff process damages the write pole. In fact, using current manufacturing techniques exhibit 15% of the write poles to have rounded corners thereby significantly degrading performance. Additionally, ion milling of a critical dimension of the write pole width and creating beveled angles for reasons described herein are not well-controlled, using only durimide, thereby causing erroneous adjacent track writing. 
   Thus, in light of the foregoing, there is a need for a perpendicular recording head having a main pole developed in such a way so as to pattern the main pole structure that is trapezoidal shape as well as prevent rounding of corners and to do so by eliminating a CMP liftoff step. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   Briefly, one embodiment of the present invention includes a perpendicular write head and a method of manufacturing the same. The write head includes a main pole that is formed using a hybrid mask formed over a laminate layer to form the main pole, without using a chemical mechanical polishing process, thereby avoiding rounding corners of the pole, the main pole being beveled in shape for improved control of track width and angle of the bevel to avoid undesirable adjacent track writing. 

   
     IN THE DRAWINGS 
       FIG. 1  shows a top perspective view of a disc drive  100  is shown in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 2  shows a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the perpendicular write head  112  in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIGS. 3-7  show the relevant steps of manufacturing the main pole  128  in accordance with an embodiment and method of the present invention. 
       FIGS. 8-12  show an alternative embodiment and method of the present invention. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
   Referring now to  FIG. 1 , a top perspective view of a disc drive  100  is shown in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The disc  100  is shown to include a voice coil motor (VCM)  102 , an actuator arm  104 , a suspension  106 , a flexure  108 , a slider  110 , a read-write (perpendicular) head  112 , a head mounting block  114 , and disc or media  116 . Suspension  106  is connected to the actuator arm  104  at the head mounting block  114 . The actuator arm  104  is coupled to the VCM  102 . The disc  116  includes a plurality of tracks  118  and rotates about axis  120 . The tracks  118  are circular, each extending circularly around the surface of the disc  116  for storing magnetically-encoded data or information using the perpendicular head  112 , which will be discussed in greater detail with respect to further figures. 
   During operation of the disc drive  100 , rotation of the disc  116  generates air movement which is encountered by the slider  110 . This air movement acts to keep the slider  110  afloat a small distance above the surface of the disc  116 , allowing the slider  110  to fly above the surface of the disc  116 . The VCM  102  is selectively operated to move the actuator arm  104  around the axis  120 , thereby moving the suspension  106  and positioning the transducing head (not shown), which includes a main pole (not shown), by the slider  110  over the tracks  118  of the disc  116 . It is imperative to position the transducing head properly to read and write data from and to the concentric tracks  118 . 
     FIG. 2  shows a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the perpendicular head (or recorder)  112 , which embodies the present invention. The disc (or medium)  116  utilized by perpendicular recorders generally includes a thin storage layer  124  having high coercivity and perpendicular anisotropy (the magnetization is held in a direction substantially normal to the surface of the disc  116 ) and a soft magnetic underlayer or keeperl 26  having high permeability. 
   The perpendicular recorder (or perpendicular write head)  112  comprises a main pole  128 , a return pole  130 , connected to each other by a back gap closure  132  at a distal end and separated from each other by a gap  136  at the ABS and write coil  134  positioned between the main pole  128  and the return pole  130 . It should be noted that structures presented in various figures of the embodiments of the present invention are not shown to scale. 
   Magnetization directions on the disc  116  are written by the main pole  128 . The main pole  128  has 0.15 micron width at the ABS to provide recording of ultra-narrow tracks on the disc  116 . Furthermore, the proposed structure of the main pole  128  decreases remnant field in the media as well as coil current for saturation field thereby reducing undesirable data erasures, faster write performance and a reduction in mechanical failures due to the lack of need for high current. 
   To write data to the perpendicular magnetic disc (or medium)  116 , a time-varying write current is caused to flow through the coil  134 , which in turn produces a time-varying magnetic field through the main pole  128  and the return pole  130 . The disc  116  is then passed by the ABS of the recorder  112  at a predetermined distance such that the disc  116  is exposed to the magnetic field. 
   A closed magnetic path for flux from the writer  112  to the disc  116  travels from the main pole  128 , through the recording layer  124  of the disc  116  to the soft magnetic layer (keeper)  126  and returns to the recorder  112  through the return pole  130 , again passing through the storage layer  124 . To ensure that the magnetic field does not write data on the return path, while not obvious in  FIG. 2 , the surface area of the return pole  130  at the ABS is generally substantially larger than the surface area of the main pole  128  at the ABS. Thus, the strength of the magnetic field affecting the storage layer  124  under the return pole  130  will not be sufficient to overcome a nucleation field of the storage layer  124 . Prior to further discussion, it should be noted that the illustrations shown in the various figures of this document are not rendered to scale. 
   For information regarding other ways of forming or manufacturing the main pole, the reader is referred to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/195,227, filed on Aug. 1, 2005 and entitled “BILAYER TRAILING SHIELD GAP FOR PERPENDICULAR HEAD”, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference, as though set forth in full, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/195,222, filed on Aug. 1, 2005 and entitled “PERPENDICULAR HEAD WITH TRAILING SHIELD and Rhodium Gap PROCESS, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference, as though set forth in full. 
   The main pole  128  and manufacturing thereof includes the present invention.  FIGS. 3-7  show the relevant steps of manufacturing the main pole  128  and the structure, as shown in  FIG. 7  of the main pole  128 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
     FIG. 3  shows the structure  200  to include a (electronic-beam) photoresist layer  202  shown to be formed above a durimide layer  204 , which is, in turn, shown formed above a silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer  206 , which is, in turn, shown formed above a durimide layer  208 . The durimide layer  208  is shown formed above a hard mask  210 , which is shown formed a laminate layer  212 . The laminate layer  212  is ultimately formed into a beveled angle main pole, as will be apparent shortly. In one embodiment of the present invention, the hard mask  210  is an aluminum oxide (Al2O3) layer  210 . 
   Regarding the size of each layer of the structure  200 , in one embodiment of the present invention, the photoresist layer  202  is 250 nanometers in thickness, however, it can be anywhere from 100-250 nanometers in thickness. In one embodiment of the present invention, the durimide layer  204  is 60 nanometers in thickness, however, it can be anywhere from 20-120 nanometers in thickness. In one embodiment of the present invention, the silicon oxide layer  206  is 100 nanometers in thickness, however, it can be anywhere from 50-150 nanometers in thickness. In one embodiment of the present invention, the durimide layer  208  is 1000 nanometers in thickness, however, it can be anywhere from 500-1500 nanometers in thickness. In one embodiment of the present invention, the hard mask  210  is 100 nanometers in thickness, however, it can be anywhere from 20-200 nanometers in thickness. In one embodiment of the present invention, the laminate layer  212  is 240 nanometers in thickness, however, it can be anywhere from 10-300 nanometers in thickness. 
   In the structure  200 , the layer  202  essentially serves as an image resist layer, the layer  204  essentially serves as ARC (anti-reflective coating layer), the layer  206  essentially serves as hard mask, the layer  208  serves essentially as a soft mask (or underlayer), the layer  210  essentially serves as hard mask and the layer  212  is the main pole material. 
   In alternative embodiments, the hard mask  210  may be made of Al 2 O 3 , SiO 3 , SiC, SiOxNy, AlSiOx, Ta, TaOx or TaN. 
   A multi-step reactive ion etching (RIE) process is performed to obtain a structure  201  of  FIG. 4  from that of the structure  200  of  FIG. 3 . During such process, the photoresist layer  202  and the durimide layer  204  are removed by a repetitive RIE process. 
   Next, a reactive fluorine mill, and a multiple-step and multi-angle milling process are performed to form the structure  203  of  FIG. 5 , which shows the layer  212  to have become beveled to create the beveled laminate main pole  214 . Additionally, milling removes the durimide layer  208  and the SiO 2  layer  206 . Ion milling uses ion beam to remove materials. The removal rate and the resulting shape are highly affected by the incident angle of the ion beam to the surface of the material. Close to vertical angle is used to form vertical shape and a lesser vertical angle to form bevel. The angle ranges from -10 to -70 degree. The presence of the hard mask  210  made of, for example, aluminum oxide, improves controlling of the bevel and aluminum oxide erodes much less than soft masks, such as durimide or DLC. Additionally, improved track width control is also achieved, which is of utmost importance in perpendicular recording heads due to their higher density. 
   Thereafter, as shown in  FIG. 6 , an alumina overcoat layer is deposited onto the structure  203  of  FIG. 5 . Alumina is basically Al 2 O 3 . The reason for an elevated topography (structure)  219  in the alumina layer is the presence of the structure  203  during deposition. That is, because alumina is deposited everywhere, where there is a raised structure, such as the structure  203 , alumina is deposited over the raised structure thereby causing an elevated topography. 
   Next, a lapping process is performed removing the structure  219  to achieve a planar surface or the planarized structure  220 . 
   The ion milling rate of hard mask, i.e. the Al 2 O 3  layer  210 , and the durimide layer  208  is 1:1, the thickness of these layers is adjusted to ensure that no durimide layer remains on the hard mask. With the embodiments of the present invention, as shown and discussed hereinabove, there is no CMP liftoff necessary that can cause corner rounding. Additionally, hard mask is favorable for ion milling of the critical dimension and bevel angle control. 
   In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, shown in the steps and structures of the  FIGS. 8-12 , the structures and steps of  FIGS. 3-7  are shown substituting the hard mask  210  with the silicon oxide SiO 2  layer  216  to form the structure  220 . Ultimately, the structure  232  results and all of the steps and material and layers of  FIGS. 8-12  are similar to that of  FIGS. 3-7 , respectively, except that the layer  216  is made of SiO2, which is also basically a hard mask and provides the same benefits as that discussed hereinabove relative to Al2O3. Other alternatives for the hard mask  210  of  FIGS. 3-7  include SiO2, SiC, SiOxNy, AlSiOx, Ta, TaOx, TaN. 
   Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is anticipated that alterations and modifications thereof will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as covering all such alterations and modification as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.