Abstract:
Insect cells are stored in a small gas cylinder, and the small gas cylinder is charged with nitrogen gas to pressurize the cylinder. The charged gas is exhausted at once to crush the cells to provide the objective cell extract with translation activity and glycosylation activity. As this method is gentler than the conventional cell-crushing method employing a homogenizer, in addition to translation factors, factors carrying glycosylation activity can also be recovered. As a result, an in-vitro glycoprotein synthesis system capable of performing translation to post-translation glycosylation can be produced.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0001]    1. Field of the Invention  
           [0002]    The present invention relates to an in-vitro translation system capable of extracellularly synthesizing protein by employing a cell extract, and particularly to a system capable of implementing both the protein synthesis and the subsequent glycosylation and thereby synthesizing glycoprotein pursuant to the cell extract.  
           [0003]    2. Description of the Related Art  
           [0004]    Functional information within living organisms is recorded on the nucleic acid, and protein, which is a functional molecule, is translated or a functional RNA molecule (ribozyme for example) is transcribed with this nucleic acid as the template. In recent years, analysis of nucleic acid and protein supporting such biofunction has been actively conducted, and, on the other hand, development of analyzing methods and analyzing means of protein has also been promoted.  
           [0005]    The analyzing method of nucleic acid has particularly shown impressive progress pursuant to the development of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the like. According to this PCR, by adding a primer and template DNA in a cell-free reaction solution containing polymerase enzymes, it is possible to freely amplify DNA fragments to this template DNA. In other words, the nucleic acid can be freely synthesized and amplified extracellularly. And, the nucleic acid synthesized here is, for example, provided to determine the primary structure (base sequence), and it is thereby possible to accelerate the progress of nucleic acid analysis, such as genome analysis.  
           [0006]    Meanwhile, with respect to the analyzing method of protein, various cell-free translation systems have been developed since A. S. Spirin et al. developed an in-vitro protein synthesis system employing  E. coli  extract. As such cell-free translation system, for example, in addition to the aforementioned  E. coli,  there are those which utilize cell extracts prepared from wheat germs, rabbit reticulocyte, and so on.  
           [0007]    Among the above, the more general cell-free translation system deriving from wheat germs grinds the wheat germs together with glass beads with a mortar or the like and synthesizes protein from mRNA by employing the cell extract obtained from such ground wheat germs. In other words, it is possible to recover the cell extract from wheat germs while preserving the protein synthesis (translation) activity existing in the wheat germs, and protein may be freely synthesized extracellularly by employing such recovered cell extract.  
           [0008]    If protein can be freely synthesized extracellularly as described above, it becomes possible to obtain a desired protein easily be eliminating complex factors and complications upon synthesizing the protein with cells, and this is advantageous in terms of analyzing the protein. From the foregoing perspective, improvement of cell-free translation systems has been conducted heretofore, and such technology is disclosed, for example, in Japanese Patent Publication No. H1-503119, Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. H4-200390, Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. H7-203984, among others. Moreover, such cell-free translation systems are commercially available as kits (Amasham, etc.) and are widely available.  
           [0009]    Nevertheless, although the conventional cell-free translation systems described above are capable of performing translation to the protein, there is a problem in that they are not able to perform post-translational modification of the translated protein. In other words, it is known that many of the intracellular proteins are translated as protein based on the mRNA transcribed from the template nucleic acid, and modified after such translation. Glycosylation is one of such post-translational modifications.  
           [0010]    The sugar chain added pursuant to this post-translational glycosylation is considered to function as a signal or ligand relating to the recognition or adhesion between substances or cells, as a function-adjusting factor of the protein itself, or as a protective or stability factor of the protein. Thus, in order to analyze the function within living organisms with respect to the protein being glycosylated, it is necessary to obtain such glycosylated protein.  
           [0011]    This glycosylation adds a sugar chain to a specific amino acid of the protein. Since the glycosylation reactions differ variously and are complicated, it is not easy to chemically add a sugar chain to the protein synthesized with the foregoing cell-free translation systems.  
           [0012]    In view of such a problem, a biochemical method; that is, a method such as a cell-free translation system for adding a sugar chain to protein by utilizing the intracellular gylcosylation activity upon employing a cell extract, has been examined, and an extract having a glycosylation activity deriving from dog tissues has been acquired. This is prepared by crushing the dog tissues with a homogenizer and recovering microsome fractions containing a Golgi body by centrifugation.  
           [0013]    This dog tissue extract is used separately from conventional cell-free translation systems. Specifically, protein is synthesized with the cell-free translation system, and, after having recovered the synthesized protein, glycosylation is performed thereto by transferring the synthesized protein in such dog tissue extract. As a result of this acquirement of dog tissue extract, the extracellular biochemical synthesis of glycoprotein became possible. And, by employing this synthesized glycoprotein for the likes of protein performance analysis, anticipated is analysis capable of further reflecting the intercellular reaction in comparison to protein synthesized with a conventional cell-free translation system and which glycosylation has not been performed thereto.  
           [0014]    Nevertheless, with the glycoprotein synthesis employing the conventional dog tissue extract, glycosylation is conducted after recovering the protein that has been synthesized with a conventional cell-free translation system. As described above, synthesis of glycoprotein through separate use of a cell-free translation system and a glycosylation system is not preferable in proteins that generally denature easily, and it is also possible that this will lead to deterioration in activity. Further, in addition to the physical influence on the protein, the operator operating the protein that denatures easily is required to concentrate one&#39;s attention, thereby making the procedure complicated, upon preparing the aforementioned two systems and synthesizing glycoprotein in two stages.  
           [0015]    Moreover, with respect to a cell extract capable of performing glycosylation, only those deriving from a restricted tissue such as dog tissue can only be used at present, and it is not yet possible to recover a glycosylation activity from universal tissue cells. The type of sugar chain will differ depending on the type of cell, and it is anticipated that the glycosylation reaction will differ depending on such cell type. Therefore, protein glycosylation can be freely designed if the recovery of glycosylation activity from various cells becomes possible.  
           [0016]    Furthermore, in recent years, various protein preparations have been developed in the medical field, and it is known that the effect of such preparations is influenced by the existence or type of sugar chain of the constituent protein. Thus, the realization of recovery of glycosylation activity from various cells is anticipated to also contribute significantly to the development and improvement of such protein preparations.  
           [0017]    Thereby, in view of the foregoing problems, the inventors of the present application conducted intense study regarding the preparation of a cell extract capable of conducting a series of processes from protein synthesis to glycosylation within a single system, and, through this research, they realized a novel preparation of a cell-free extract differing from a conventional cell-free translation system, and enabled the series of processes from protein synthesis to glycosylation to be conducted within a single system by employing such extract.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0018]    Accordingly, as a result of examining the preparation of a cell extract, inventors of the present invention realized the preparation of the cell extract described below. Particularly, with the cell extract preparation of the present invention, the cells are crushed with a gentle means of changing the pressure surrounding the cells from pressurization to depressurization, and, at the least, the protein synthesis activity and glycosylation activity of the cells in the cell extract are recovered.  
           [0019]    In other words, the cell-free extract of the present invention is a cell-free extract prepared by crushing cells and which has activity for synthesizing protein from a template nucleic acid, wherein the cells under pressure are depressurized and thereafter crushed in an inert gas atmosphere.  
           [0020]    According to the present invention, the cells are prepared through crushing or disrupture pursuant to a pressure change without grinding the cells as with conventional homogenizers. By crushing the cells pursuant to a pressure change as described above, in comparison to conventional cell-crushing methods employing a homogenizer, the cells can be crushed under gentle conditions and it is thereby possible to reduce the influence on intracellular organs.  
           [0021]    In the aforementioned description, the cells are animal cells.  
           [0022]    In the aforementioned description, an inert gas flow is supplied and pressurized in the atmosphere, and the inert gas is exhausted from the atmosphere and depressurized thereafter.  
           [0023]    In the aforementioned description, the inert gas is nitrogen, carbon dioxide or argon.  
           [0024]    In the aforementioned description, the inert gas is supercritical gas.  
           [0025]    Moreover, the cell-free extract of the present invention is a cell-free extract prepared by crushing cells having a protein synthesis activity and a glycosylation activity for adding a sugar chain to the synthesized protein, and which is capable of synthesizing glycoprotein from a template nucleic acid, wherein the cells under pressure are depressurized and crushed in an inert gas atmosphere so as to preserve the protein synthesis activity and glycosylation activity of the cells.  
           [0026]    According to the present invention, by crushing the cells having a protein synthesis (translation) activity and glycosylation activity pursuant to a pressure change so as to avoid destroying both such activities, it is possible to prepare a cell extract retaining both activities. It is thereby possible to create a system having both a cell-free translation system and a glycosylation system, which were conventionally prepared separately, and, by using such a system, protein synthesis and glycosylation can be implemented with a single cell extract.  
           [0027]    In the aforementioned description, the cells derive from insects.  
           [0028]    In the aforementioned description, regarding the cell-free extract, an inert gas flow is supplied and pressurized in the atmosphere, and the inert gas is exhausted from the atmosphere and depressurized thereafter.  
           [0029]    In the aforementioned description, the inert gas is nitrogen, carbon dioxide or argon.  
           [0030]    In the aforementioned description, the pressure at the time of pressurization is 2 to 14 kgf/cm 2 .  
           [0031]    In the aforementioned description, the cells are crushed in a state of being prepared at 0.25 to 1.5×10 8  cells/ml.  
           [0032]    Furthermore, the present invention provides a cell-free glycoprotein synthesis composition. This cell-free glycoprotein synthesis composition is composed by adding a cell extract having the foregoing glycosylation activity to the cell extract having the protein synthesis activity. As described above, by supplementing a glycosylation activity through the addition of a cell extract having a glycosylation activity to a cell extract which only has a protein synthesis activity on its own, it is thereby possible to compose a composition having both the protein synthesis activity and the glycosylation activity.  
           [0033]    In the aforementioned description, the cell-free extract having the protein synthesis activity is prepared by depressurizing cells under pressure and crushing the cells in an inert gas atmosphere.  
           [0034]    Moreover, the present invention provides a glycoprotein synthesis system. This glycoprotein synthesis system comprises mRNA synthesizing means for transcribing mRNA from a DNA coding protein capable of being glycosylated; and glycoprotein synthesizing means capable of synthesizing glycoprotein from the mRNA synthesized with the mRNA synthesizing means pursuant to a cell-free extract or composition having the protein synthesis activity and glycosylation activity, wherein the glycosylated glycoprotein is synthesized with the glycoprotein synthesizing means based on the mRNA transcribed from the DNA with the mRNA synthesizing means.  
           [0035]    According to this system, so as long as a template DNA is prepared in advance, glycoprotein can be easily synthesized from this template DNA via the mRNA.  
           [0036]    Further, the glycoprotein synthesis system may further comprise an expression vector for expressing mRNA from the DNA by inserting the DNA coding the protein capable of being glycosylated into the downstream of a promoter. By further comprising an expression vector as described above, for example, it becomes possible to easily synthesize glycoprotein by removing a gene of interest from the genome and connecting such gene to this expression vector.  
           [0037]    This expression vector is provided with an untranslated region sequence, which is a sequence for adding an untranslated region to the mRNA synthesized pursuant to the expression from the promoter and which derives from the gene of the protein capable of being glycosylated inside the cells used for preparing the cell-free extract. By providing an untranslated region of a gene that produces glycoprotein inside the cells as described above, it becomes possible to improve the efficiency of glycosylation to the synthesized protein.  
           [0038]    In the aforementioned description, the cells are insect cells, and the promoter and untranslated region within the expression vector may derive from a virus having insect cells as its host.  
           [0039]    In the aforementioned description, the virus is baculoviridae, and the promoter and untranslated region sequence may derive from baculoviridae polyhedrin.  
           [0040]    Moreover, since glycoprotein can be produced easily through use of the cell-free extract, composition and glycoprotein synthesis system according to the present invention, intracellular performance analysis employing glycoprotein may be conducted with ease.  
           [0041]    The present invention also provides a protein produced by employing the cell-free extract described above.  
           [0042]    The present invention further provides a glycoprotein produced by employing the cell-free extract described above.  
           [0043]    The present invention additionally provides a cell-free extract manufacturing device. This cell-free extract manufacturing device is for manufacturing a cell-free extract capable of synthesizing protein from a template nucleic acid by crushing cell shaving a protein synthesis activity, and comprises: a container for containing the cells; a gas supply unit for filling the container with inert gas; and a pressure control unit for pressurizing, and thereafter depressurizing, the pressure inside the container so as to enable the crushing of cells inside the container in a state of preserving the protein synthesis activity of the cells.  
           [0044]    Moreover, regarding this cell-free extract manufacturing device, the cells further have a glycosylation activity for adding a sugar chain to the synthesized protein, wherein the pressure control unit pressurizes, and thereafter depressurizes, the pressure inside the container so as to enable the crushing of cells inside the container in a state of preserving the protein synthesis activity and glycosylation activity of the cells.  
           [0045]    By employing these cell-free extract manufacturing devices, it is possible to easily manufacture a cell extract having a protein synthesis activity or a cell extract also having a glycosylation activity.  
           [0046]    The present invention also provides a cell-free protein synthesis system. This cell-free protein synthesis system synthesizes unglycosylated protein by employing the foregoing cell-free extract, from the mRNA transcribed from the template DNA in which the intracellular transitional signal of the gene DNA corresponding to the glycoprotein has been deleted.  
           [0047]    As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to delete the intracellular transitional signal since the protein is synthesized with a cell-free system. With conventional methods of synthesizing protein without glycosylation, it was necessary to replace the amino acid of an N-type glycosylation signal and express it as a secretory protein outside the cell by employing an expression system such as —CHO cells, yeast or silkworm larva. When converting the N-type glycosylation sequence with amino acid replacement upon employing this type of expression system, there is a possibility that the three-dimensional protein structure will differ from the original structure thereof. Contrarily, according to the present invention, the elimination of a signal sequence at the DNA level becomes possible as a cell-free system is employed, and the identical protein structure can be adopted since a mature protein is synthesized without having to change the amino acid structure of the structural gene. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0048]    [0048]FIG. 1 is a structural diagram of the translation device in the present embodiment;  
         [0049]    [0049]FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the construction method of the mRNA expression vector in Example 1;  
         [0050]    [0050]FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of the mRNA expressed with the expression vector in Example 1;  
         [0051]    [0051]FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the examination results of the gas pressure conditions upon preparing the cell extract in Example 4;  
         [0052]    [0052]FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the examination results of the additive amount of mRNA in Example 4;  
         [0053]    [0053]FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the examination results of a preferable translational reaction time in Example 4;  
         [0054]    [0054]FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the examination results of a preferable translational reaction temperature in Example 4;  
         [0055]    [0055]FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the examination results of the magnesium acetate concentration in Example 4;  
         [0056]    [0056]FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the examination results of the potassium acetate concentration in Example 4;  
         [0057]    [0057]FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the examination results of the spermidine concentration in Example 4;  
         [0058]    [0058]FIG. 11 is a diagram showing the examination results of the GTP concentration in Example 4;  
         [0059]    [0059]FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the examination results of the ATP concentration in Example 4;  
         [0060]    [0060]FIG. 13 is a diagram showing the examination results of the creatine kinase concentration in Example 4;  
         [0061]    [0061]FIG. 14 is a diagram showing the results of identifying, with Western blotting, the translational product by employing the insect cell extract in Example 4;  
         [0062]    [0062]FIG. 15 is a diagram showing the results upon detecting, with Western blotting, the translational product pursuant to the cell extract of insect cells, rabbit reticulocyte and wheat germs in Example 4;  
         [0063]    [0063]FIG. 16 is a diagram showing the results of deglycosylation of the translational reaction product pursuant to the insect cell extract in Example 5; and  
         [0064]    [0064]FIG. 17 is a diagram showing the results of Western blotting upon analyzing the translation and glycosylation activity of the CHO-insect compositional solution in Example 8. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS  
       [0065]    The preferred embodiments of the present invention are now explained.  
         [0066]    [Preparation of Cell-Free Extract] The cell-free extract is prepared by depressurizing cells under pressure and crushing such cells in an inert gas atmosphere.  
         [0067]    Cells which may be used to prepare the foregoing cell-free extract may be any cells so as long as such cells have a translation activity for synthesizing protein from a template nucleic acid, and a glycosylation activity for implementing post-translation glycosylation, and may broadly include prokaryotic cells to eukaryocyte cells. For instance, cells of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, plants, microorganisms, among others may be used. Among such aforementioned wide variety of cells, mammalian cells and insect cells may be preferably adopted as cells capable of recovering translation activity. Moreover, insect cells may be preferably adopted as cells for recovering both the translation activity and glycosylation activity. Further, these cells may be cells in tissues or obtained from tissues, or cultured cells.  
         [0068]    These cells are disposed in an inert gas atmosphere while they are being crushed. This inert gas is used so that the extract after the crushing of cells will not influence the translation activity or the like upon contacting the air. Therefore, so as long as this objective can be attained, there is no limitation on the type of inert gas, and, for example, nitrogen or argon may be used.  
         [0069]    The pressure at the time of pressurizing and crushing the cells may be suitably determined depending on the type of cells. This pressure may be determined with the translation activity of the ultimately obtained extract as the index upon giving consideration to the durability of factors relating to the strength of the film or wall covering the periphery of the cells to be used, internal translation, post-translation modification, and so on. For example, for cells deriving from insects, the pressure may be set to 2 to 14 kgf/cm 2 , preferably to 5 to 8 kgf/cm 2 , and more preferably to 8 kgf/cm 2 . Moreover, in the case of CHO cells, it is preferable that a pressure relatively higher than the insect cells be set, and, specifically, the pressure may be set to 2 to 32 kgf/cm 2 . Further, the pressurization time may also be suitably determined pursuant to the various types of cells and so on. For this determination as well, the pressurization time may be determined with the translation activity of the ultimately obtained extract as the index upon giving consideration to the durability of factors relating to the strength of the film or wall covering the periphery of the cells to be used, internal translation, post-translation modification, and so on. For example, for cells deriving from insects, such time may be set to 3 to 120 minutes, preferably to 30 to 120 minutes, and more preferably to 60 to 90 minutes.  
         [0070]    Further, the depressurization after pressurization will suffice so as long as the pressure is depressurized rapidly so as to enable the crushing of cells, and the pressure after depressurization may be set to a normal pressure or to a pressure lower than a normal pressure by mechanically lowering such pressure.  
         [0071]    The pressure change from the aforementioned pressurized state to the depressurized state may be conducted by supplying and exhausting gas in and out of the atmosphere which contains the cells, or by contracting or expanding the volume of the contained cells. The inert gas described above may be preferably used in the former case of supplying and exhausting gas.  
         [0072]    Ultimately, a cell-free extract is prepared by recovering the extract after the crushing of cells. This cell-free extract, in principle, is used for discrimination with the cell extract within viable cells, and the existence of cell residue after the crushing is irrelevant. Therefore, the cell extract after crushing may be made into a cell-free extract in a state where residue exists, or after eliminating the crushed cell residue by centrifugation or the like as necessary.  
         [0073]    Moreover, with respect to the cell-free extract prepared here, although an extract deriving from a specific cell may be used independently, there may be cases where the glycosylation activity is low or cannot be exhibited when independently using an extract deriving from a specific cell even though it may possess protein synthesis activity. In such a case, it is possible to supplement the glycosylation activity by adding a suitable ratio of a cell-free extract deriving from other cells having glycosylation activity. For example, as with the cell-free extract deriving from CHO cells which has protein synthesis activity but cannot exhibit glycosylation activity when used independently, a cell-free extract deriving from insect cells and having glycosylation activity may be suitably added in order to supplement the glycosylation activity.  
         [0074]    [Glycoprotein Synthesis System] Next, the template nucleic acid to be the substrate for performing translation and glycosylation upon employing the aforementioned cell-free extract is explained.  
         [0075]    1. Expression Vector  
         [0076]    Upon protein synthesis (translation), an mRNA as the template thereof is required, and for the production (transcription) of this mRNA, a DNA as the template thereof is required. Here, an expression vector containing the template DNA to be the substrate of mRNA synthesis is described.  
         [0077]    A desired sequence coding the protein is inserted into the expression vector in order to synthesize the mRNA to become the substrate of protein synthesis. Although this protein code sequence is not particularly limited, preferably used as this protein code sequence is a sequence coding a protein capable of being glycosylated in order to enable the aforementioned cell-free extract to perform glycosylation after the protein synthesis.  
         [0078]    In the foregoing expression vector, a promoter for commencing the transcription is provided to the upstream of the sequence coding the aforementioned protein. Although this promoter is not particularly limited, various RNA polymerase promoters may be preferably used for synthesizing a single-strand mRNA. For example, a T7RNA polymerase promoter, T3RNA polymerase, SP6RNA polymerase and so on may be used.  
         [0079]    Further, 5′ and 3′ untranslated region (UTR) sequences are provided at both ends of the expression vector so as to sandwich the protein code sequence described above, and these sequences are added as UTR at both ends of the mRNA upon being synthesized as mRNA and control the translation thereof. As this UTR sequence functions as a control sequence upon conducting translation with the cell-free extract, it is preferable that this sequence is selected in accordance with the cells used in the preparation of the cell-free extract, and, for example, used may be a UTR deriving from such cells or a UTR deriving from a virus or phage which infects such cells.  
         [0080]    For example, when employing insect cells for the preparation of the cell-free extract described above, a UTR deriving from insect cells or a UTR deriving from a virus, baculoviridae for instance, capable of infecting the insect cells may be used as the UTR thereof.  
         [0081]    Further, it is preferable that the expression vector described above retains an auto-reproduction performance. The auto-reproduction performance of various plasmids or virus DNA may be used for this type of auto-reproduction performance. These may be suitably selected in accordance with the host for amplifying the expression vector or with the host for realizing the expression pursuant to this vector. For example, when selecting  E. coli  as the host, a pUC or pBR plasmid may be used as the expression vector. Further, when selecting mammalian cells as the host, virus DNA such as SV40 may be preferably used. If necessary, a plurality of auto-reproduction performances may be provided in order to structure a shuttle vector having an auto-reproduction performance in differing hosts.  
         [0082]    2. mRNA Synthesis  
         [0083]    In order to synthesize mRNA with the expression vector described above, a transcription factor such as RNA polymerase is necessary. A transcription factor retaining viable cells may be used as this type of transcription factor. In other words, mRNA may be synthesized by inserting such viable cells in the aforementioned expression vector and employing the intracellular transcription factor. The mRNA synthesized here may be prepared as a target mRNA by being separated from other intracellular mRNA and refined thereafter in accordance with well-known methods.  
         [0084]    When utilizing the intracellular transcription factor as described above, it becomes necessary to refine the target mRNA from numerous intra cellular mRNA. In order to simplify the refining operation of such mRNA, this transcription factor may employ an extract having a transcription activity obtained from cells, and an in-vitro transcription system. As this in-vitro transcription system, for example, exemplified may be a transcriptional reaction system deriving from T7 phage, transcriptional reaction system deriving from  E. coli , among others. mRNA synthesis employing this system may be conducted upon utilizing commercially available kits; for instance, MEGAscript™ (Ambion), RiboMAX™ (Promega), and so on.  
         [0085]    When performing mRNA synthesis (transcription process) in-vitro as described above, the series of processes from the mRNA synthesis (transcription) process to the protein synthesis (translation) described later and the glycosylation process thereafter may be implemented extracellularly; that is, in-vitro.  
         [0086]    3. Translation and Glycosylation of Protein  
         [0087]    In principle, the in-vitro translation and glycosylation reaction may be implemented by adding the aforementioned mRNA to the cell-free extract having both the protein synthesis activity and glycosylation activity. In other words, since the foregoing cell-free extract system has both the translation activity for protein synthesis and post-translational glycosylation activity, protein is synthesized from this mRNA pursuant to the addition of mRNA to the aforementioned cell-free extract system, and, thereafter, glycoprotein is synthesized by glycosylation being performed to this protein.  
         [0088]    Moreover, upon synthesizing glycoprotein as described above, a cell extract may be prepared by adding the likes of magnesium acetate, potassium acetate, spermidine, GTP, ATP, creatine kinase, buffer or the like to the cell extract. As an example, in a cell extract of insect cells, the translational reaction may be provided by setting the ultimate concentration to 10.6 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.95), 1.3 mM magnesium acetate, 100 mM potassium acetate, 2.5 mM DTT, 0.25 mM spermidine, 444 μg/ml creatine kinase, 8.0 mM creatine phosphate, 1.2 mM ATP, and 0.25 mM GTP. Moreover, it is preferable to add an amino acid mixture to the cell extract. This mixture may be added, for example, such that the final concentration will become roughly 25 μm.  
         [0089]    Further, although it is necessary to add mRNA to the cell extract upon performing protein synthesis, this additive amount may be an additive amount similar to a conventional in-vitro translation system, and, for example, may be added to the cell extract such that the final concentration becomes 200 μg/ml. With respect to protein synthesized pursuant to such a method, after being isolated from the cell extract as necessary, such synthesized protein (or glycoprotein) may be used for various purposes.  
         [0090]    [Translation Device] 
         [0091]    Preparation of the aforementioned cell extract to the synthesis of protein (glycoprotein) maybe automated. A device for achieving such automation can be structured as follows.  
         [0092]    A translation device  10  comprises an extract preparation unit  12  for preparing a cell-free extract from cells, and a translation unit  14  for performing protein synthesis with the obtained extract.  
         [0093]    This extract preparation unit  12  internally houses cells, the cells are crushed therein, and an extract is prepared thereby. The crushing of such cells is implemented through the internal pressure change of the extract preparation unit  12 . In order to implement this pressure change, inert gas is contained in the extract preparation unit  12 , and an inert gas supply unit  16  is provided to such extract preparation unit for supplying inert gas. In other words, this inert gas supply unit  16  raises the internal pressure of the preparation unit  12  and applies pressure to the contained cells by delivering inert gas to the extract preparation unit  12 . Moreover, the inert gas supplied from this inert gas supply unit  16  prevents the extract after the crushing of cells from contacting air (oxygen), and prevents the deterioration of various activities in the extract.  
         [0094]    Furthermore, the aforementioned extract preparation unit  12  is also provided with an outlet  18  for exhausting the delivered inert gas, depressurizing the internal pressure of the preparation unit  12 , and crushing (disrupturing) the cells.  
         [0095]    The extract preparation unit  12  also comprises a control unit  20  for delivering the inert gas into the extract preparation unit  12  and controlling the pressure change pursuant to the exhaustion thereof. This control unit  20  enables the control in accordance with the strength of the film or wall covering the cells and recovers the protein synthesis activity and glycosylation activity within the cell extract after the crushing of cells.  
         [0096]    Meanwhile, the translation unit  14  is connected to the extract preparation unit  12  so as to allow the extract prepared in the extract preparation unit to be supplied. Although not shown in FIG. 1, a reaction container is internally provided to the translation unit  14 , and the extract is injected in such reaction container. Further, the translation unit  14  also comprises a sample-injection unit, and this sample-inject unit injects the mRNA to be the substrate of protein synthesis into the reaction container.  
         [0097]    According to the aforementioned translation device  10 , a cell extract is prepared by supplying cells into the extract preparation unit  12 , and crushing such cells in the extract preparation unit  12 . And, the cell extract prepared thereby is supplied into the reaction container in the translation unit  14 , mRNA is added thereto, and glycoprotein is synthesized thereby.  
         [0098]    Moreover, in the foregoing translation device, if necessary, a transcription unit for producing mRNA from an expression vector may also be provided, and mRNA to be supplied to the translation device may be produced in this transcription unit. As described above, when comprising such transcription unit, the series of processes to the synthesis of protein from the expression vector via the mRNA may be automated.  
       EXAMPLES  
       [0099]    Examples of the present invention are now described in detail, but the present invention shall in no way be limited thereto.  
       Example 1  
     Preparation of Expression Vector  
       [0100]    HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) GP120 was used as the protein known to be capable of being glycosylated, and the in-vitro synthesis of the glycoprotein thereof was attempted. In order to synthesize this glycoprotein, an expression vector for expressing this gp120mRNA was structured as follows. FIG. 2 shows a frame format of the structuring method of the expression vector, and FIG. 3 shows the structure of the gp120mRNA comprising polyhedrin UTR expressed from this expression vector. Moreover, the base sequence of this polyhedrin 5′-UTR is shown in sequence number 1, and the base sequence of 3′-UTR is shown in sequence number 2 (Robert, D. et al., Virology 185, 229-241 (1991)).  
         [0101]    In FIG. 2, foremost, point mutation was inserted into the pVL1393-gp120 plasmid with PCR, and the recognition sites of Eco RI and Sal I were formed at both ends of the gp120. The plasmid with the point mutation inserted therein was cut with restriction enzymes of Eco RI and Sal I, and the gp120′ fragment with slightly chipped ends was isolated. Meanwhile, the plasmid pUC18, which is to be the frame of the expression vector, was similarly cut with restriction enzymes of Eco RI and Sal I, and the aforementioned gp120′ fragment was inserted therein in order to obtain pUC18-1.  
         [0102]    Next, two primers having Xho I or Sal I as its terminal were used to amplify the remaining sequence of 3′ terminal and 3′ UTR sequence of gp120 from the pVL1393-gp120 plasmid with PCR, and this amplified fragment was inserted into the Sal I site of the pUC18-1 to obtain pUC18-2.  
         [0103]    The remaining sequence of the 5′ terminal and 5′UTR sequence of gp120 were produced by synthesis, and, upon this synthesis, T7RNA polymerase promoter sequence number 3 was added to the upstream of the 5′UTR. In addition, an Eco RI site was inserted at both ends of this synthesized fragment with PCR, and this fragment was inserted into the Eco RI site of the pUC18-2. Thereby produced was a pUC18-gp120 plasmid inserted into the gp120 expression cassette containing the UTR sequence in the downstream of the T7RNA polymerase promoter sequence.  
         [0104]    This pUC18-gp120 plasmid was transcribed in-vitro by employing MEGAscript™ (Ambion) in order to prepare the gp120mRNA shown in FIG. 3. Various examinations in the synthesis of glycoprotein were conducted with this gp120mRNA as the template.  
         [0105]    (1) Influence of Cell Count  
         [0106]    Insect cells Sf21 cells (J. L. Vaughn, R. H. Goodwin, G. L. Tompkins, and P. McCawley, In-vitro, 13, 213-217 (1977)) were used for the preparation of the cell extract. Cell suspensions of differing cell concentrations of the Sf21 cells were respectively inserted into a miniature bomb (MINI-BOMB CELL DISRUPTION CHAMBER (manufactured by KONTES)), and processed for 30 minutes at a nitrogen gas pressure of 8 kgf/cm 2 . A cell extract was obtained by centrifuging (manufactured by BECKMAN, L7 Ultracentrifuge Type 55, Rotor: SW40Ti rotor, 14000 rpm×15 min) the respective cell solutions after this processing.  
         [0107]    The translation performance was examined by employing the cell extract prepared above. In order to analyze the translation performance, the aforementioned gp120mRNA was added to the cell extract such that the final concentration would be 200 μg/ml, and translational reaction was implemented thereby. The quantity of the post-reaction protein was determined with two methods. One method is a method of detecting, with avidin, the incorporated amount of the biotin-labelled lysine tRNA to the translational product. The other method is a method of detecting the translational product with the Western blotting method employing a GP120 antibody, and determining the quantity of the detected product with a densitometer (FastScan, manufactured by Molecular Dynamics). The translation performance was evaluated with these determination methods. The results are shown in Table 1.  
                                         TABLE 1                       Influence of Cell Count                                    Cell Density   1.5   1.0   0.5   0.25           (10 8  cells/ml)           Translation   91   100   44   1.7           Performance (%)                      
 
         [0108]    As shown in Table 1, the preferable cell count for the cell extract to maintain translation performance was within the range of 0.25 to 2.5×10 8  cells/ml, and most preferably 1.0×10 8  cells/ml.  
         [0109]    (2) Influence of Nitrogen Gas Pressure  
         [0110]    Influence on the translation performance was examined similar to the above with the nitrogen gas pressure in the miniature bomb in a range of 2 to 14 kgf/cm 2 . The cell count was set to 1.0×10 8  cells/ml, which was preferable in the aforementioned examination, and the cells were crushed by setting the nitrogen gas processing time to 30 minutes. The gp120mRNA was added to the cell extract such that the final concentration would be 200 μg/ml, and the translational reaction was implemented thereafter. The translation performance was compared from the protein synthesis amount under the respective gas pressure conditions. The results are shown in Table 2.  
                                     TABLE 2                       Influence of Nitrogen Gas Pressure                                    Nitrogen Gas    5    8   14           Pressure (kg/cm 2 )           Translation   99   100   64           Performance (%)                      
 
         [0111]    As shown in Table 2, the nitrogen gas pressure may be set within the range of 2 to 14 kgf/cm 2 , and preferably within the range of 5 to 8 kgf/cm 2 , and most preferably to 8 kgf/cm 2 .  
         [0112]    Moreover, FIG. 4 shows the fractional pattern upon synthesizing protein from the gp120mRNA and fractionalizing the synthesized protein by employing the Sf cell extract prepared under the pressurization conditions of 5, 8 and 14 kgf/cm 2 . As shown in lanes 2, 4 and 6 of FIG. 4, glycoprotein (shown as arrow 1 in FIG. 4) is specifically synthesized from mRNA in the cell extract prepared under the pressurization conditions of 5 to 14 kgf/cm 2 , and, particularly, favorable glycoprotein synthesis was detected in the cell extract under the pressurization conditions of 8 and 14 kgf/cm 2 .  
         [0113]    (3) Influence of Pressurization Time by Nitrogen Gas  
         [0114]    The nitrogen gas pressurization time for preparing the cell extract was examined by setting the cell count to 1.0×10 8  cells/ml and the nitrogen gas pressure to 8 kgf/cm 2 .  
                                                                                           TABLE 3                           Influence of Pressurization Time by Nitrogen Gas            Pressurization Time (min)   3   5   10   15   30   60   90   120                    Translation   25   40   56   63   76   100   100   46       Performance (%)                  
 
         [0115]    As shown in Table 3, the pressurization time would be sufficient so as long as it is 3 minutes or more, and, particularly, the preferable pressurization time was 30 to 60 minutes.  
         [0116]    (4) Influence of Spray Velocity  
         [0117]    The velocity of spraying the solution of the crushed cells from the miniature bomb within the range of 15 to 200 ml/sec was examined. The spray velocity did not influence the translation performance.  
       Example 3  
     Examination of Translational Reaction Conditions  
       [0118]    (1) Optimization of mRNA Concentration  
         [0119]    The additive amount of mRNA to the cell extract during the translational reaction was examined. 3.125 μg/ml to 400 μg/ml of mRNA was respectively added to the aforementioned Sf cell extract such that the concentration thereof would be sequentially doubled, and the translation performance and glycosylation performance were measured thereby. The results are shown in FIG. 5. In FIG. 5, the circle represents the GP120 without the addition of a sugar chain and the diamond represents the GP120 with the addition of a sugar chain.  
         [0120]    As shown in FIG. 5, the production of GP120 (unglycosylated) in 200 μg/ml was high, and it has been evidenced that the translation performance could be efficiently used. Meanwhile, the glycoprotein showed an approximately stable high value when 50 μg/ml or more.  
         [0121]    (2) Influence of Reaction Temperature and Reaction Time  
         [0122]    Temperature conditions at the time of the translational reaction were examined. gp120mRNA was added to the cell extract such that the final concentration would be 200 μg/ml and reacted for 30, 60 and 90 minutes under a temperature of 15° C. to 45° C., and the production of the translational product was measured. Here, used was a cell extract prepared by crushing cells upon setting the cell count to 1.0×10 8  cells/ml and the nitrogen gas processing time to 30 minutes.  
         [0123]    [0123]FIG. 6 shows a graph of the relative production. As shown in FIG. 6, at a reaction temperature of 25° C., translation and glycosylation activities were yielded, and, particularly, the peak of glycosylation activity existed at a reaction time of approximately 60 minutes, and the peak of translation activity was speculated to be roughly between 30 to 60 minutes.  
         [0124]    Meanwhile, at 37° C., in comparison to 25° C., the translation and glycosylation activities deteriorated to approximately one half, and at 45° C. both activities deteriorated significantly. Moreover, at 15° C., although both activities are low, a pattern was represented where the production increased proportionately to the time with respect to glycoprotein.  
         [0125]    Further, FIG. 7 shows a comparative graph of the production rate of GP120 with respect to the reaction temperature and reaction time by employing a purple silkworm cell extract prepared by crushing purple silkworm cells under similar conditions as with the aforementioned Sf cells. Favorable translation and glycosylation activities were also yielded at a reaction temperature of 250 C with the purple silkworm as well.  
         [0126]    (2) Influence of Additives such as Reagents  
         [0127]    Influence on the translation performance upon adding various reagents to the cell extract was examined. Here, magnesium acetate, potassium acetate, spermidine, GTP, ATP and creatine kinase were respectively added at a fixed scope of concentration to the cell extract, and the production quantity of protein and glycoprotein from the gp120mRNA was relatively determined, and the translation performance and glycosylation performance were examined.  
         [0128]    [0128]FIG. 8 shows the examination results of the magnesium acetate concentration. In FIG. 8, the circle represents the GP120 without the addition of a sugar chain and the diamond represents the GP120 with the addition of a sugar chain.  
         [0129]    As shown in FIG. 8, with respect to magnesium acetate, a favorable translation activity was yielded at 1.5 mM, and a favorable glycosylation activity result was represented at 2 mM.  
         [0130]    [0130]FIG. 9 shows the examination results of the potassium acetate concentration. With respect to potassium acetate, both the translation activity and glycosylation activity were high at 100 mM. In FIG. 9 also, the circle represents the GP120 without the addition of a sugar chain and the diamond represents the GP120 with the addition of a sugar chain.  
         [0131]    [0131]FIG. 10 shows the examination results of the spermidine concentration. With respect to spermidine, protein production (unglycosylated) was highest at 0.25 mM, and showed at 0.25 mM is preferable. In FIG. 10 (and FIG. 11, FIG. 12 and FIG. 13 as well), the solid line represents an unglycosylated GP120, and the dotted line represents the glycosylated GP120.  
         [0132]    [0132]FIG. 11 shows the examination results of the GTP concentration. With respect to GTP, protein production (unglycosylated) was highest at 0.25 mM, and translation was performed efficiently within such scope of concentration. Meanwhile, the production of glycoprotein was not influenced largely by the GTP concentration.  
         [0133]    [0133]FIG. 12 shows the examination results of the ATP concentration. With respect to ATP, protein production (unglycosylated) was highest at 1 to 1.5 mM, and translation was performed efficiently within such scope of concentration. Meanwhile, the production of glycoprotein showed a slightly high value at 0.5, but was not influenced largely by the ATP concentration.  
         [0134]    [0134]FIG. 13( a ) and FIG. 13( b ) show the examination results of the creatine kinase concentration. As shown in FIG. 13( a ) and FIG. 13( b ), the translation activity yielded the most favorable results at 4001 μg/ml upon conducting two experiments. Meanwhile, the glycosylation activity yielded favorable results at 400 μg/ml or more.  
         [0135]    These results were summarized, and the cell extract was prepared as the following composition in the Examples below, and a translational reaction was conducted at 25° C.  
         [0136]    Insect cell extract A260=30.4 HEPES-KOH (pH 7.95) final concentration 10.6 mM, magnesium acetate final concentration 1.3 mM, potassium acetate final concentration 100 mM, DTT final concentration 2.5 mM, spermidine final concentration 0.25 mM, creatine kinase final concentration 444 μg/ml, creatine phosphate final concentration 8.0 mM, ATP final concentration 1.2 mM, GTP final concentration 0.25 mM, amino acid mixture final concentration 25 μMm, RNA final concentration 200 μg/ml.  
       Example 4  
     Identification of Translational Product Employing Insect Cell Extract  
       [0137]    The translational product GP120 synthesized by employing the aforementioned cell extract was analyzed with the Western blotting method using an HIV patient antiserum. The results of the analysis are shown in FIG. 14 and FIG. 15.  
         [0138]    As shown in FIG. 14, GP120 was detected at a position corresponding to 90 kDa and 56 kDa on the SDS-PAGE (lane 2 and lane 3). Meanwhile, GR120 expressed pursuant to the Sf21 cells with the baculoviridae insect cells is glycoprotein, and was detected as an extremely strong band at the position of 90 kDa (lane 5 and lane 6). This suggests that glycosylation may have been performed to the translational product synthesized with the SF cell extract.  
         [0139]    Meanwhile, the translational product obtained in the control cell extract prepared from rabbit reticulocyte and wheat germs was detected with a strong band at a position of 56 kDa (lane 4 and lane 6 in FIG. 15), and a band corresponding to the position of 90 kDa, as with the translational product synthesized with the insect cell extract (lane 2), could not be detected. This suggests a strong possibility that post-translational modification such as glycosylation was performed only to the GP120 synthesized with the insect cell extract.  
       Example 5  
       [0140]    Deglycosylation of Translational Reaction Product  
         [0141]    In order to confirm that the translational product GP120 synthesized pursuant to the translational reaction upon employing the Sf21 cell extract in Example 4 is a glycosylated glycoprotein, the translational product GP120 was processed with saccharolytic enzymes. Here, as such saccharolytic enzymes, an N-type saccharolytic enzyme such as N-glycosidase F, endoglycosidase F or endoglycosidase H was used. The results of the decomposition reaction are shown in FIG. 16.  
         [0142]    As shown in FIG. 16, as a result of processing the GP120 with the aforementioned N-type saccharolytic enzyme, the 90 kDa band existing in the unprocessed fraction disappeared, and, in place thereof, a new protein band was detected at a position unacknowledged in the unprocessed sample (position shown with the arrow). This shows that the band is a band shift produced by deglycosylation, and strongly suggests that an N-type sugar chain was added to the translational reaction product GP120. Moreover, although similar processing was performed with O-glycosidase, the addition of an O-type sugar chain could not be acknowledged (not shown).  
         [0143]    Whether the translational product has a sugar chain was examined with other methods. The aforementioned GP120 protein was provided to a lectin-sepharose column, and fractionated by being eluted with methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside. And, Western blotting was performed to the through fraction obtained above and to the fraction eluted with methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside by employing an HIV patient antiserum. As a result, a gp120 band was detected at a position corresponding to the aforementioned 90 kDa only for the fraction eluted with methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside (not shown). Accordingly, this also strongly suggests that the translational product GP120 is a glycoprotein having a sugar chain.  
       Example 6  
     Analysis of Glycoprotein Synthesis Employing Various mRNA  
       [0144]    With respect to control sequences such as UTR and signal sequences as well as code sequences coding a protein capable of being glycosylated, mRNA differing from the foregoing Examples was prepared to examine whether translation and glycosylation would be performed. The UTR used here derived from baculoviridae polyhedrin or from a bovine growth hormone (BGH). Moreover, the signal sequence used here derived from interleukin 6 (IL6) (sequence number 5) or from chicken lysozyme (cL) (sequence number 4). Further, as the code sequence, an interleukin 6 (IL6) code sequence was used as the common sequence. Similar to Example 1, these were structured as an expression plasmid by employing pUC18, and mRNA was produced thereby to examine the following translation and glycosylation activities. The results are listed in Table 4.  
                                                                                                                                                             TABLE 4                                       Translation/       Purple       Wheat           Glycosylation   Insects   Silkworm   Rabbit   Germs                            1   BMV Protein 2a   Translation   +   +   ++   +   +           2   Protein 2a   Translation   ±   ±   ++   ++   ++           3   Exterior Covering Protein   Translation   +   +   ±   ++   ++                4   SF162 gp120   Translation   +   +   +   +                   Glycosylation   +   +   −   −                            Expression           Code                                   System   5′-UTR   Signal   Protein   3′-UTR               5   ppILIL6p   Polyhedrin   IL6   IL6   Polyhedrin   Translation   −   ND   −   ND       6   ppCIL6p   Polyhedrin   cL a)     IL6   Polyhedrin   Translation   +   +   +   ND                               Glycosylation   +   +       ND       7   pp (−) IL6p   Polyhedrin   None   IL6   Polyhedrin   Translation   +   +   +   ND       8   pBILIL6B   BGH b)     IL6   IL6   BGH   Translation   −   ND   −   ND       9   pBCIL6B   BGH   cL   IL6   BGH   Translation   −   ND   ±   ND       10   pB (−) IL6B   BGH   None   IL6   BGH   Translation   −   ND   ±   ND       11   ppCIL6B   Polyhedrin   cL   IL6   BGH   Translation   +   ND   +   ND                               Glycosylation   +   ND       ND       12   pBCIL6p   BGH   cL   IL6   Polyhedrin   Translation   −   ND   −   ND                                          
 
         [0145]    With the analysis employing the mRNA of SF162gp120 shown in Example 1, although the translation activity and glycosylation activity were confirmed in extracts deriving from insect SF cells or purple silkworm, in the cell extracts deriving from rabbit reticulocyte and wheat germs, translation activity was acknowledged, but glycosylation activity could be not detected.  
         [0146]    Moreover, from the analysis employing mRNA having variously differing control sequences (column 5 to column 12), it has been exhibited that translation and glycosylation are conducted when employing a 5′UTR deriving from polyhedrin as the 5′UTR, and when employing a sequence deriving from cL as the signal sequence (column 6 and column 11). Further, glycosylation was performed in the 3′UTR regardless of it deriving from polyhedrin or from a bovine growth hormone.  
         [0147]    Meanwhile, when employing the type deriving from BGH as the 5′UTR in the insect cell extract, and when employing an IL6 signal as the signal sequence, only translation was conducted, and glycosylation was not performed. From this, it is clear that the 5′UTR and signal sequence are important in the implementation of glycosylation.  
         [0148]    In addition, with respect to cell extracts deriving from rabbit reticulocyte and wheat germs, which are controls, glycosylation could not be observed at all in the employed mRNA.  
       Example 7  
     Examination Employing CHO Cells  
       [0149]    Similar to the aforementioned insect cells, examined was whether the cell extracts of mammalian cells have both translation and glycosylation activities. Here, CHO cells were used as the mammalian cells, and a CHO cell extract was prepared with the same method as the preparation conditions of the cell extract of the foregoing insect cells. Moreover, pursuant to the analysis of the translation performance and the like of the cell extract of CHO cells, three types of mRNA were prepared. These mRNA are, as shown in the following Table 5, (1) a first mRNA having a gp120 (deriving from HIV-1SF162) code sequence, polyhedrin UTR and gp120 signal sequence, (2) a second mRNA having an IL6 code sequence, polyhedrin UTR and cL signal sequence, and (3) a third mRNA having an IL6 code sequence, mammalian expression vector pRc/CMV UTR and an IL signal sequence.  
         [0150]    The translation activity and glycosylation activity of the CHO cell extract were examined by employing these three types of mRNA. The results are shown in Table 5. The results in the cell extract of insect cells (Sf cells), in which the translation and glycosylation activities were confirmed, are also shown as the positive control.  
                                       TABLE 5                       Cell Extract   Template   Template Type   UTR   Signal Sequence   Translation   Glycosylation                   Insect Cell   gp120 of HIV-1 SF162   Baculoviridae (insect)   Polyhedrin   gp120 of HIV-1 SF162   +++   +++           Human Interleukin 6   CHO Cell (mammal)   Polyhedrin   Chicken Lysozyme   +++   +++                   UTR of Mammalian   Human Interleukin 6   ++   ++                   Expression                   Vector pRc/CMV       CHO Cell   gp120 of HIV-1 SF162   Baculoviridae (insect)   Polyhedrin   gp120 of HIV-1 SF162   ++   −           Human Interleukin 6   CHO Cell (mammal)   Polyhedrin   Chicken Lysozyme   ++   −                   UTR of Mammalian   Human Interleukin 6   +++   −                   Expression                   Vector pRc/CMV                          
 
         [0151]    As shown in Table 5, with the CHO cell extract, translation activity was confirmed in each mRNA, but glycosylation activity could not be confirmed. Thus, with the CHO cell extract, although the glycosylation activity could not be confirmed, on the other hand, it has been shown that it is possible to recover at least a cell extract having a translation activity from the mammalian cells with the cell-crushing method employing the aforementioned gas pressure change.  
         [0152]    Furthermore, upon comparing the translation performance, it has been shown that the translation performance improved when employing a pRc/CMV UTR. This implies that the correspondence of the type of prepared cell and the type of cell deriving from the UTR are important in improving the translation performance.  
         [0153]    Meanwhile, with the insect cell extract employed as the positive control, translation activity and glycosylation activity were confirmed in each mRNA. Particularly, it has been shown that the translation activity and glycosylation activity can be improved when employing a polyhedrin UTR. From this, it is clear that a UTR deriving-from living organisms capable of infecting cells, which prepared the cell extract, and being grown and developed may be preferably used as the control sequence for performing translation and glycosylation upon employing such cell extract.  
       Example 8  
     Mixed Compositional Solution of CHO Cell Extract and Insect Cell (Sf Cell) Extract  
       [0154]    As described above, with the CHO cell extract, translation activity was detected, but gylcosylation activity could not be detected. In order to supplement this glycosylation activity, a compositional solution was prepared by mixing the CHO cell extract and insect cell extract in various mixture ratios, and the translation activity and glycosylation activity pursuant to this compositional solution were examined.  
         [0155]    Specifically, in the examination described above, used as the mRNA was IL6mRNA (mRNA from ppILIL6p, ppILIL6B or ppCLIL6B in Example 6) comprising a signal sequence deriving from IL6 or deriving from chicken lysozyme (cL). Such mRNA was added to the respective compositional solutions, and a part of such compositional solution was fractionalized pursuant to electrophoresis, and, after such fractionalization, the identification and production of the IL6 protein were compared with Western blotting employing an anti-IL6 antibody. The results of Western blotting are shown in FIG. 17, and the values in which the band strength was quantified with a densitometer are shown in Table 6.  
                                                                         TABLE 6                           A) Employment of IL6 Original Signal Sequence            CHO Cell Extract   10   9.9   9   5   0       Insect Cell Extract   0   0.1   1   5   10       pre-IL6   66   65   57   85   100       Glycosylated IL6   0   0   4   43   95       IL6 with Signals Removed   0   0   3   6   33            B) Replacement of IL Signal Sequence with Chicken       Lysozyme Signal Sequence            CHO Cell Extract   10   9.9   9   1   0       Insect Cell Extract   0   0.1   1   9   10       pre-IL6   26   29   23   31   48       Glycosylated IL6   0   2   11   61   100       IL6 with Signals Removed   0   0   2   13   32                  
 
         [0156]    As shown in FIG. 17 and Table 6, with the CHO-insect (9.9:0.1) compositional solution, although an IL6 protein was detected, a glycosylated IL6 protein could not be detected, and it has been shown that the glycosylation activity was not supplemented.  
         [0157]    Meanwhile, with the CHO-insect (9:1) compositional solution and CHO-insect (5:5) compositional solution, a band was detected at a position corresponding to the IL6 protein band to which is added a sugar chain detected in the case of an independent control cell extract, and it has been shown that glycosylation was performed.  
         [0158]    As described above, even with cell extracts only having a translation activity, it is possible to supplement a glycosylation activity by mixing another cell extract having glycosylation performance. As a result, although the cell extract of CHO cells are prepared under gentle conditions of gas pressure change, one of the factors responsible for the glycosylation activity originally possessed by the cells is insufficient in yielding such glycosylation activity. Nevertheless, by such factor being supplemented with the insect cell extract, suggested is a possibility that the glycosylation activity can be supplemented.  
       Example 9  
     Application  
       [0159]    With the extract and compositional solution containing such extract of the insect cells shown in the foregoing Examples, it has been shown that translation, glycosylation and even processing could be performed in-vitro. Further, the control sequence capable of improving the efficiency of glycosylation was also demonstrated. By packing an expression vector comprising such a cell extract and control sequence, an in-vitro glycoprotein synthesis kit may be formed thereby, and it is thereby possible to easily synthesize in-vitro glycoprotein and processed protein.  
         [0160]    Further, with the aforementioned CHO-insect compositional solution, since processing could also be performed, this compositional solution is expected to be useful as a model system for analyzing the processing of post-translational protein. In other words, by crushing the cells under a gentle condition employing inert gas, it has been suggested that a cell-free extract can be recovered while preserving the membrane relating to glycosylation or the like. Accordingly, not only is this cell-free extract useful upon synthesizing glycoprotein and the like, it is also beneficial as a model system upon analyzing how the protein (or precursor) synthesized by translation is processed after such translation.  
         [0161]    As described above, according to the present invention, provided is a novel cell extract preparation, and it is thereby possible to easily recover a cell-free extract having translation and glycosylation functions from cells. Moreover, by employing the cell-free extract of the present invention, a desired sugar chain existing in animals and plants may be added to, for example, a recombinant protein.  
     
       
       
         1 
         
           
             7  
           
           
             1  
             52  
             DNA  
             Baculoviridae  
           
            1 

gggagtattt tactgttttc gtaacagttt tgtaataaaa aaacctataa at             52 

 
           
             2  
             379  
             DNA  
             Baculoviridae  
           
            2 

aacacgatac attgttatta gtacatttat taagcgctag attctgtgcg ttgttgattt     60 

acagacaatt gttgtacgta ttttaataat tcattaaatt tataatcttt agggtggtat    120 

gttagagcga aaatcaaatg attttcagcg tctttatatc tgaatttaaa tattaaatcc    180 

tcaatagatt tgtaaaatag gtttcgatta gtttcaaaca agggttgttt ttccgaaccg    240 

atggctggac tatctaatgg attttcgctc aacgccacaa aacttgccaa atcttgtagc    300 

agcaatctag ctttgtcgat attcgtttgt gttttgtttt gtaataaagg ttcgacgtcg    360 

ttcaaaatat tatgctgca                                                 379 

 
           
             3  
             21  
             DNA  
             Artificial sequence  
             
               Designed DNA to serve as T7 RNA polymerase 
      promoter  
             
           
            3 

taatacgact cactataggg a                                               21 

 
           
             4  
             54  
             DNA  
             Artificial sequence  
             
               Designed DNA to serve as signal sequence to 
      examine whether translation and glycosylation would be performed  
             
           
            4 

atg agg tct ttg cta atc ttg gtg ctt tgc ttc ctg ccc ctg gct gct       48 
Met Arg Ser Leu Leu Ile Leu Val Leu Cys Phe Leu Pro Leu Ala Ala 
1               5                   10                  15 

ctg ggg                                                               54 
Leu Gly 

 
           
             5  
             18  
             PRT  
             Artificial sequence  
             
               Amino acid sequence resulting from translation 
      of DNA SEQ ID NO. 4, above.  
             
           
            5 

Met Arg Ser Leu Leu Ile Leu Val Leu Cys Phe Leu Pro Leu Ala Ala 
1               5                   10                  15 

Leu Gly 

 
           
             6  
             84  
             DNA  
             Artificial sequence  
             
               Designed DNA to serve as signal sequence to 
      examine whether translation and glycosylation would be performed  
             
           
            6 

atg aac tcc ttc tcc aca agc gcc ttc ggt cca gtt gcc ttc tcc ctg       48 
Met Asn Ser Phe Ser Thr Ser Ala Phe Gly Pro Val Ala Phe Ser Leu 
1               5                   10                  15 

ggg ctg ctc ctg gtg ttg cct gct gcc ttc cct gcc                       84 
Gly Leu Leu Leu Val Leu Pro Ala Ala Phe Pro Ala 
            20                  25 

 
           
             7  
             28  
             PRT  
             Artificial sequence  
             
               Amino acid sequence resulting from translation 
      of DNA SEQ ID NO. 6, above.  
             
           
            7 

Met Asn Ser Phe Ser Thr Ser Ala Phe Gly Pro Val Ala Phe Ser Leu 
1               5                   10                  15 

Gly Leu Leu Leu Val Leu Pro Ala Ala Phe Pro Ala 
            20                  25