Abstract:
Without intercell coordination on a per communication request basis, channel assignment can be efficiently performed by developing for each cell, or a sector thereof when the cells are sectorized using directional antennas, a priority list of groups of channels, and selecting a channel to be assigned in response to a request for service from the highest priority group which has available channels at the time of the service request. The priority lists are developed based on various interference measurements that are made. The priority lists tend to remain the same for relatively long periods of time. However, periodically, the priority lists should be redetermined to insure that the best lists are being employed. For example the lists may need to be changed due to new construction or to seasonal vegetation changes which may affect the interference experienced in the system. Advantageously, system capacity under peak concentrated load conditions may increase. This advantage is further magnified under field conditions for which the cell shapes are not ideal.

Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
     This invention relates to wireless communication systems in which areas served by the wireless communication system are divided at least into cells, and more particularly, to a system for dynamically allocating available system channels to wireless terminals requiring service. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     A problem in the art of wireless communication is to minimize interference between the links, each of which uses at least one channel, employed in neighboring cells while maximizing the overall use of the available spectrum. One prior art method to increase the spectrum utilization is to reuse the same channels at appropriate geographic separations. How to arrange the assignments of the channels to cells so that they may be reused to maximize the overall use of the available spectrum while minimizing the interference between the channels is the so-called “channel reuse problem”. 
     It has been recognized in the art that dynamic channel assignment systems perform better than static channel assignment systems. One reason for this is because the number of users in any particular cell changes over rime, and such dynamic systems can respond to such changes. Another reason is the ability to share channels on a need to have them basis. However, the best performing prior art dynamic channel assignment systems require some form of intercell communication for each communication request, to coordinate the channel assignments. Disadvantageously, such intercell communication adds latency to the channel assignment process which degrades system performance. Such degradation can be especially acute for high-speed data communication which is bursty and often transfers only small amounts of data at any time, e.g., mouse clicks or packet acknowledgments. Further disadvantageously, the requirement of communication between the base stations places an additional load on the base stations and on the inter-base-stations network, which consumes additional resources and can degrade performance. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     We have recognized that, even without intercell coordination on a per communication request basis, channel assignment can be efficiently performed by, developing for each cell, or a sector thereof when the cells are sectorized using directional antennas, a priority list of groups of channels, and selecting a channel to be assigned in response to a request for service from the highest priority group which has available channel at the time of the service request. The priority lists are developed based on various interference measurements that are made. The priority lists tend to remain the same for relatively long periods of time. However, periodically, the priority lists should be redetermined to insure that the best lists are being employed. For example the lists may need to be changed due to new construction or to seasonal vegetation changes, which may affect the interference experienced in the system. Advantageously, system capacity under peak concentrated load conditions may increase. This advantage is further magnified under field conditions for which the cell shapes are not ideal. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING 
     In the drawing: 
     FIG. 1 shows a locality which is served by a fixed wireless system; 
     FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for an exemplary process for performing interference measurements that are necessary to develop priority lists in accordance with an aspect of the invention; 
     FIG. 3 shows an exemplary process, in accordance with the principles of the invention, for building priority lists for use in assigning channels from the data measured using the process shown in FIG. 2; 
     FIG. 4 shows an exemplary process, in accordance with the principles of the invention, to assign channels by making use of the uplink and downlink priority lists developed by the process of FIG. 3; and 
     FIG. 5 shows an exemplary set of uplink priority lists for a locality based on a reuse cluster size of 7, with a fixed interference cluster size and a relative interference cluster size of 19, and in which each cell has eight sectors. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The following merely illustrates the principles of the invention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. Furthermore, all examples and conditional language recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor(s) to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure. 
     Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the block diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the invention. Similarly, it will be appreciated that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudocode, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown. 
     The functions of the various elements shown in the FIGS., including functional blocks labeled as “processors” may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate software. When provided by a processor, the functions may be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term “processor” or “controller” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, read-only memory (ROM) for storing software, random access memory (RAM), and non-volatile storage. Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also be included. Similarly, any switches shown in the FIGS. are conceptual only. Their function may be carried out through the operation of program logic, through dedicated logic, through the interaction of program control and dedicated logic, or even manually, the particular technique being selectable by the implementor as more specifically understood from the context. 
     In the claims hereof any element expressed as a means for performing a specified function is intended to encompass any way of performing that function including, for example, a) a combination of circuit elements which performs that function or b) software in any form, including, therefore, firmware, microcode or the like, combined with appropriate circuitry for executing that software to perform the function. The invention as defined by such claims resides in the fact that the functionalities provided by the various recited means are combined and brought together in the manner which the claims call for. Applicant thus regards any means which can provide those functionalities as equivalent as those shown herein. 
     Unless otherwise explicitly specified herein, the drawings are not drawn to scale. 
     FIG. 1 shows a locality which is served by a fixed wireless system. As is well known, a fixed wireless system is a wireless system in which not only are the base stations at a fixed location, but so are the terminals (not shown). The locality is divided into cells  101 , each cell including one of base stations  103 . Conceptually, the locality may be viewed as if extended indefinitely in any direction. 
     For purposes of channel reuse, the cells of FIG. 1 are arranged into a first set of fixed clusters  105  of non-overlapping set of F cells, as in the prior art, the so-called “reuse clusters”, according to a channel reuse plan. For example, F=4 is widely used for implementation of Global System Mobile (GSM). Such an example is shown in FIG. 1, in which the channel reuse clusters are delineated in FIG. 1 by the bold border lines. Note that, as shown in FIG. 1, there may be cells that not part of a complete reuse cluster. Nevertheless, each such cell is assigned a number as if the cells that were missing from its reuse cluster did indeed exist, in accordance with the concept of an infinite locality 
     Each cell of a reuse cluster is assigned a set of uplink channels, which makes up the cell&#39;s primary uplink channel group, and a set of downlink channels, which makes up the cell&#39;s primary downlink channel group. Like positioned cells within each cluster are assigned the same uplink and downlink channel groups. Furthermore, if the cells are sectorized, sets of the channels of each cells primary uplink and downlink channel groups may be allocated to each sector within the cell as primary uplink and downlink channels groups for the sector, with like positioned sectors with each reuse cluster being assigned the same primary uplink and downlink channel groups. In FIG. 1, each cell of a reuse cluster is assigned one of four primary groups of channels, the particular group being indexed by the lower number in each cell. 
     Additionally, irrespective of the first clustering into reuse clusters, for purposes of the invention, the cells are also arranged into a second set of nonoverlapping fixed interference clusters  107  of I cells. An exemplary value of I is 19. Each cell in a fixed interference cluster is assigned a number from 1to I. These numbers are shown in FIG. 1 as the upper index in each cell of FIG.  1 . Like positioned cells within each cluster are assigned the same number, so that the distance between like numbered cells is maximized. Complete fixed interference clusters are shown with shading in FIG.  1 . Note that, as shown in FIG. 1, there may be cells that not part of a complete fixed interference cluster. Nevertheless, each such cell is assigned a number as if the cells that were missing from its fixed interference cluster did indeed exist, in accordance with the concept of an infinite locality. 
     Thus, each cell is part of two fixed clusters, its reuse cluster and its fixed interference cluster, with respective indices which indicate the cell&#39;s position within each of the clusters. 
     The exemplary fixed interference cluster size of I=19 cells was chosen based on the assumption that interference to a receiver caused by a transmitter not located in the same cell and not in the first two rings of cells surrounding the receiver&#39;s cell is low enough to be ignored. In other words, it is assumed that interference can only originate from the two rings surrounding a cell in which the receiver is located. However, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate how to apply the principles of the invention in the event that a different second cluster size should be chosen because the interference is either greater or less than postulated by this assumption. 
     In addition to fixed reuse clusters  105  and fixed interference clusters  107 , each cell is also at the center of its own relative interference cluster of I cells, which includes the cell and the group of I-1 cells located in the two closest rings surrounding the cell. For clarity purposes, because of the extreme overlapping nature of the relative interference clusters, the relative clusters are not shown in FIG.  1 . It should be appreciated, however, that in the example shown in FIG. 1 each cell with a fixed interference cluster index of 1 has as its relative interference cluster the fixed interference cluster of which it is a part. There may be cells that are not part of a complete relative interference cluster, e.g., at the physical borders of the locality. Nevertheless, each such cell is part of a relative cluster as if the cells that were missing from its relative interference cluster did indeed exist, in accordance with the concept of an infinite locality. 
     In accordance with an aspect of the invention, it is possible to use a relatively high channel reuse factor. Doing so is advantageous, because it reduces interference in a lightly loaded system. However, because of the ability of one cell to “borrow” channels assigned to another cell, in accordance with the principles of the invention, the penalty of reduced capacity associated with a high reuse factor in prior art systems is mitigated. Note that although FIG. 1 shows a channel reuse factor of 4, this should not be construed as limiting, in that the value of FIG. 1 was chose for clarity of exposition purposes only, given the limited space available in FIG. 1 as well as the familiarity of those of ordinary skill in the art with the GSM reuse factor of 4. Thus, FIG. 5, described hereinbelow, shows another example with a reuse factor of 7, and reuse factors of 19 or more may be employed. 
     The uplink and downlink channels assigned for use in communicating with a, terminal in response to a service request are selected by a so-called “local” controller associated with that cell. More specifically, in accordance with the principles of the invention, the local controller assigns the channels for the terminal by selecting a channel from a highest priority group of prioritized groups of channels for the cell, or sector thereof, in which the terminal is located, which has an available channel at the time of the service request, without requiring intercell communication on a per-request basis. For bi-directional communication, an uplink and a downlink channel need to be assigned. 
     By “local” it is meant that the controller serves one cell or a group of neighboring cells. Thus, although the following description is for an embodiment of the invention in which each cell has its own local controller, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily be able to implement embodiments of the invention in which a single local controller serves more than one cell. Typically the controller is software that executes on the hardware of the computer of a base station for which the controller assigns the channels. In the embodiment of the invention described hereinbelow, each cell has its own local controller, which is referred to as a cell controller. 
     FIG. 2 shows a flowchart of a process for performing exemplary interference measurements of the type that can be used to develop priority lists in accordance with an aspect of the invention. Such measurements are employed to determine intercellular, or intersector should sectorization be employed, interference, and should be repeated from time to time in order to: have accurate measurements in the face of changes in the environment which affect intercellular interference, such as a) man made changes, e.g., the putting up or talking down of a building, or b) seasonal changes, such as the presence or absence of leaves. 
     Prior to the start of the process in FIG. 2 the locality is divided, as noted above, into fixed nonoverlapping fixed interference clusters of I cells, e.g., clusters  107  shown in FIG. 1, so that, for example, when I=19 there are 19 cells per fixed interference cluster. Similarly, each cell is divided into J sectors, J being an integer greater than or equal to 1, so that, for example, when J=3 there are 3 sectors per cell. Each sector in a cell is assigned a number from 1 to J, with like positioned sectors within each cell being assigned the same number. Thus, the cells within each cluster may be denoted Ci, where i=1 to I and each sector within a cluster may be denoted as Sij, i=1 to I,j=1 to J. Note that, for the conceptually infinite locality, Sij is an infinite group of sectors. 
     The process is entered in step  201 , when it is determined that it is time to initiate a the measurements that are required to set the priority lists. In step  203  a common base station received power level for the uplink is set to Pr, e.g. −90 dBm. In other words, the transmit power for the transmitter of each of the terminals will be set so that each terminal is being received at the base station with a received power of Pr. To this end, in step  205  the value of i is initialized to 1 and in step  207  the value of j is likewise initialized to 1. Thereafter, in step  209 , the receivers of the base stations in sector Sij of each of the clusters are activated. 
     In step  211 , each terminal in each sector Sij of each cluster is activated one at a time and its transmit power is tuned so that the transmitted signal is received at its corresponding base station sector receivers with a power of Pr. Control then passes to conditional branch point  213 , which tests to determine if j&lt;J, i.e., if there remains any sector in the cell that have not had the transmit power of each of its terminals set so as to be received at the base station with a power of Pr. If the test result in step  213  is YES, which indicates that there remains at least one sector in the cell that has not had the transmit power of each of its terminals set so as to be received at the base station with a power of Pr, control passes to step  215 , in which j is incremented, so that it points to the next sector of the cell. Control then passes back to step  209  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  213  is NO, indicating that all the terminals in all the sectors have had the transmit powers of each of their terminals set so as to be received at the base station with a power of Pr, control passes to conditional branch point  217 . 
     Conditional branch point  217  tests to determine if i&lt;I., i.e., if there remains any cell in the cluster that has not had the transmit power of each of its terminals set so as to be received at the base station with a power of Pr. If the test result in step  217  is YES, indicating that there indeed remains at least one cell in the cluster that has not had the transmit power of each of its terminals set, control passes to step  219 , in which i is incremented, so that it points to the next cell of the cluster. Control then passes back to step  207  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  217  is NO, indicating that all the terminals in all the cells of all the clusters have had their transmit powers set, control passes to step  220 . 
     Now that the transmit power of all the terminals have been set, the following steps describe a process of measurement designed to find out the relative interference potential between sectors. 
     In step  220  the value of i, which is used as the index of the transmitting cell within a cluster, is initialized to 1. Then in step  221  the value off, which is used as the index of the transmitting sector within a cells, is likewise initialized to 1. Next, all terminals in sector Sij of each cluster have their transmitters activated, in step  223 . Furthermore, all other transmitters in the cluster are kept off. Thereafter, a base station receiver is activated in each sector of every cell of every cluster, except those receivers that are in the cells Ci, in step  225 . The receiver that is activated is tuned to the same frequency on which the terminal transmitters are transmitting. 
     In step  227  a receiving cell index i′ is initialized to 1. Conditional branch point  229  tests to determine if i′=i. If the test result in step  229  is NO, indicating that the cell being pointed to by i′ is not the cell for which the base station receivers are off, control passes to step  231 , which initializes a receive sector counter j′ to 1. An uplink power measurement P i′,j′   u (i,j) is then measured and recorded in step  233 . This notation indicates that the power measured P is an uplink power measurement, as denoted by the superscript u, with the indices inside the parenthesis representing the transmitting sector and the subscripted i′,j′ indicating the measuring sector. 
     Conditional branch point  235  tests to determine if j′&lt;J, i.e., if there remains any sectors in the measuring cell that have not yet had the uplink power from the transmitting sectors measured yet. If the test result in step  235  is YES, which indicates that there remains at least one sector in the measuring cell that has not yet had the uplink power from the transmitting sectors, control passes to step  237 , in which j′ is incremented, so that it points to the next sector of the cell. Control then passes back to step  233 , and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  235  is NO, indicating that all the sectors in the measuring cell have measured the uplink power from the transmitting sectors, or the test result in step  229  is YES, which indicates that the cell being pointed to by i′ is the cell for which the base station receivers are off, control passes to conditional branch point  239 . 
     Conditional branch point  239  tests to determine if i′&lt;I, i.e., if there remains any cell in the cluster, other than the cell for which the base station receivers are off, that has not yet had the uplink power from the transmitting sectors measured. If the test result in step  239  is YES, indicating that there is at least one cell in the cluster that has not yet measured the uplink power from the transmitting sectors, control passes to step  241 , in which i′ is incremented, so that it points to the next cell of the cluster. Control then passes back to step  229  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  239  is NO, indicating that each cell in the cluster has measured the uplink power from the transmitting sectors, control passes to step  243 . 
     Note that for pedagogical purposes, steps  227  through  239  are shown as being sequentially performed. However, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize the advantage in time saved that can be realized by compressing the effects of these steps to perform each of the measurements required by the iterations of step  233  in parallel. 
     In step  243  all the terminal transmitters and all the base station receivers which had been transmitting are deactivated. Next, conditional branch point  245  tests to determine if j&lt;J, i.e., if there remains any sectors in the cell that has not had all of its terminals activated and transmit. If the test result in step  245  is YES, indicating that there indeed remains at least one sector in the cell that has not had all of its terminals activated and transmit, control passes to step  247 , in which j is incremented, so that it points to the next sector of the cell. Control then passes back to step  223  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  245  is NO, indicating that all of the sectors in the cell have had its terminals activated and transmit, control passes to step  249 . 
     Conditional branch point  249  tests to determine if i&lt;I., i.e., if there remains any cell in the clusters that has not had all of its terminals activated and transmit. If the test result in step  249  is YES, indicating that there indeed remains at least one cell in the cluster that has not had all of its terminals activated and transmit, control passes to step  251 , in which i is incremented, so that it points to the next cell of the cluster. Control then passes back to step  221  and the process continues as described above. 
     If the test result in step  249  is NO, indicating that all the terminals in all the cells of all the clusters have had their terminals activated and transmit, control passes to step  253 , in which the value of i is initialized to 1. In step  255  the value of j is likewise initialized to 1. In step  257 , a transmitter of each base station in sector Sij of each of the clusters is activated. The receivers of all terminals in all sectors of all the cells, except those receivers located in the sectors of cell Ci are activated, in step  259 . 
     In step  261  a receiving cell index i′ is initialized to 1. Conditional branch point  263  tests to determine if i′=i. If the test result in step  263  is NO, indicating that the cell being pointed to by i′ is not the cell for which the base station transmitters are on, control passes to step  265 , which initializes a receive sector counter j′ to 1. A terminal counter k′ is initialized to 1 in step  267 , where k′ ranges from 1 to the number of terminals in the particular sector. 
     Each terminal k′ measures, in step  269 , the power that it receives, which is denoted P i′,j′,k′   d (i,j), where the superscript d denotes a downlink power, the indices i,j inside the parenthesis indicate the transmitting sector, the subscripts i′,j ′ indicate the measuring sector, and k′ indicates the particular terminal within the measuring sector. The terminal transmits the power measurement taken in step  269  to its associated base station in step  271 . 
     Conditional branch point  273  tests to determine if k′ is the last terminal in the sector, i.e., if there are no further terminals remaining in the sector that need to measure their downlink power and transmit it to the base station. If the test result in step  273  is NO, indicating there yet remains additional terminals to measure their receive power and transmit it to the base station, control passes to step  275 , in which the value of k′ is incremented. Control then passes back to step  269  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  273  is YES, indicating that there are no further terminals to measure their receive power and transmit the measurement to the base station, control passes to step  277 , in which the in which the base station sums the data it received from sector Si′j′, i.e., the base station computes            P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       d                     (     i   ,   j     )       =       ∑     k   ′                         P       i   ′     ,     j   ′     ,     k   ′       d                       (     i   ,   j     )     .                                
     Conditional branch point  279  then tests to determine if j′&lt;J, i.e., if there remains any sectors in the measuring cell that have not yet had their downlink interference power determined. If the test result in step  279  is YES, which indicates that there remains at least one sector in the measuring cell that has not yet had its downlink interference power determined, control passes to step  281 , in which j′ is incremented, so that it points to the next sector of the cell. Control then passes back to step  267  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  279  is NO, indicating that all the sectors in the measuring cell have determined their downlink power, or the test result in step  263  is YES, which indicates that the cell being pointed to by i′ is the cell for which the terminal receivers are off, control passes to conditional branch point  283 . 
     Conditional branch point  283  tests to determine if i′&lt;I, i.e., if there remains any cell in the cluster, other than the cell for which the terminal receivers are off, that has not yet had the downlink power for its sectors determined. If the test result in step  283  is YES, indicating that there is at least one cell in the cluster that has not yet had the downlink power for its sectors determined, control passes to step  285 , in which i′ is incremented, so that it points to the next cell of the cluster. Control then passes back to step  263  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  283  is NO, indicating that each cell in the cluster has had the downlink power for its sectors determined, control passes to step  289 . 
     Note that as with steps  227  through  239 , for pedagogical purposes, steps  261  through  285  are shown as being sequentially performed. However, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize the advantage in time saved that can be realized by compressing the effects of these steps to perform each of the measurements required by the iterations of step  271  in parallel. 
     In step  287  all the terminal transmitters and all the base station receivers which had been transmitting are deactivated. Next, conditional branch point  289  tests to determine if j&lt;J, i.e., if there remains any sectors in the cell that has not had a base station transmitter activated. If the test result in step  289  is YES, indicating that there indeed remains at least one sector in the cell that has not had a base station transmitter activated, control passes to step  291 , in which j is incremented, so that it points to the next sector of the current cell i. Control then passes back to step  257  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  289  is NO, indicating that all of the sectors in the cell have had a base station transmitter activated, control passes to step  293 . 
     Conditional branch point  293  tests to determine if i&lt;I., i.e., if there remains any cell in the clusters that has not had a base station transmitter activated in each of its sectors. If the test result in step  293  is YES, indicating that indeed there remains at least one cell in the cluster that has not had a base station transmitter activated in each of its sectors, control passes to step  295 , in which i is incremented, so that it points to the next cell of the cluster. Control then passes back to step  255  and the process continues as described above. If the test result in step  293  is NO, indicating that there remains no cells in the cluster that has not had a base station transmitter activated in each of its sectors, control passes to step  297 , in which the process is exited. 
     FIG. 3 shows an exemplary process, in accordance with the principles of the invention, for building priority lists for use in assigning channels, from the data measured using the process shown in FIG.  2 . Prior to executing the process of FIG. 3 the channels must be divided into G channel groups as is conventionally done for prior art fixed wireless systems. As a simple example for pedagogical purposes, G=4 for an unsectorized GSM system, as shown in FIG.  1 . Each channel group is assigned to the like positioned cell, or sector within a cell, of each of a first fixed clusters  105 . Also, the measurements which are obtained from performing the process of FIG. 2 must be available prior to performing the process of FIG.  3 . The process is typically performed whenever there is a change in the assignment of the G channel groups, which is relatively rare, or when there are new measurements that are produced from performing the measurement process of FIG. 2, which although not common happens more often. Note that for each relative interference cluster centered on a cell there is a function, grp(g) that contains all sectors of the relative interference cluster that have group g as their primary channel group. 
     In step  303  each base station disseminates the power measurements produced by performing the process of FIG. 2 to each of the other base stations in its relative cluster. Next, in step  305 , each base station, e.g., base station i, computes for each sector Sij of its J sectors and for each channel group g, a quantity Uij(g) indicative of the average uplink interference that is expected to result from use of channel group g to by terminals located in sector Sij. More specifically, Uij(g) is the sum of two terms, i.e.,          Uij                   (   g   )       =         ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       u                     (     i   ,   j     )         +       ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       u                       (       i   ′     ,     j   ′       )     .                                  
     The first term            ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       u                     (     i   ,   j     )         ,                          
     is the sum of the interference power received by the base station&#39;s sector receivers in the relative cluster of cell i that were allocated a channel group g and was caused by transmitters of terminals in sector Sij. The second term            ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       d                     (       i   ′     ,     j   ′       )         ,                          
     is the sum of the power received by the base station&#39;s receiver for sector Sij that was generated by the transmitters of all the terminals located in sectors of the relative cluster of cell i and allocated channel group g. 
     Also, in step  305 , each base station, e.g., base station i, computes for each sector Sij of its J sectors and for each channel group g, a quantity Dij(g) indicative of the average downlink interference that is expected to result from use of channel group g by base station transmitters located in sector Sij. More specifically, Dij(g) is the sum of two terms, i.e.,          Dij                   (   g   )       =         ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       d                     (     i   ,   j     )         +       ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P     i   ,   j     d                       (       i   ′     ,     j   ′       )     .                                  
     The first term            ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       d                     (     i   ,   j     )         ,                          
     is the sum of the interference power received by all of the terminal receivers in the relative cluster of cell i located in sectors that were allocated channel group g and was caused by the base station transmitter of sector Sij. The second term            ∑       i   ′     ,       j   ′     ∈     grp                   (   g   )                               P       i   ′     ,     j   ′       d                     (       i   ′     ,     j   ′       )         ,                          
     is the sum of the power received by all of the terminal receivers located in sector Sij and that was generated by the base station transmitter of sector within the relative cluster of cell i that were allocated channel group g. 
     Each base station builds a priority list for the uplink, and a second priority list for the downlink, for each of its sectors in step  307  as follows. For the uplink, the base station assigns a priority to each channel group so that as each channel group has an increasingly smaller value of Uij(g) that channel group receives an increasingly higher priority assignment in the uplink priority list. Furthermore, after determining the priorities, regardless of its actual computed priority, the highest priority is given to the channel group assigned to the sector while none of the relative priorities of any of the other channel groups is changed. Note that if the channel group assigned to the sector did not naturally fall out as having the highest priority the implementor may want to investigate the underlying cause, as this tends to indicate a problem with the initial channel group assignments. The groups are then numbered from 1 to in priority order, so that the group having the highest priority is priority number 1 and the group having the lowest priority is priority number G. 
     Similarly, for the downlink, the base station assigns a priority to each channel group so that as each channel group has an increasingly smaller value of Dij(g) that channel group receives an increasingly higher priority assignment in the downlink priority list. Again, after determining the priorities, regardless of its actual computed priority, the highest priority is given to the channel group assigned to the sector while none of the relative priorities of any of the other channel groups is changed. Note that if the channel group assigned to the sector did not naturally fall out as having the highest priority the implementor may want to investigate the underlying cause, as this tends to indicate a problem with the initial channel group assignments. The groups are then numbered from 1 to G, in priority order, so that the group having the highest priority is priority number 1 and the group having the lowest priority is priority number G. 
     To reduce the required computations, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the computations of the interferences for the channel group assigned to the sector may be eliminated, as the channel group assigned to the sector is always given highest priority. Upon completion of this step, each base station has  2 J priority lists. 
     The process then exits in step  309 . 
     FIG. 4 shows an exemplary process, in accordance with the principles of the invention, to assign channels by making use of the uplink and downlink priority lists developed by the process of FIG.  3 . The process is entered in step  401  when a call request is received at a base station for communication with a terminal in sector j of that base station. In step  403 , a counter for the uplink priority lists, r u , is initialized to 1, so that it indicates the uplink channel group having the highest priority. Next, a search is performed in the uplink channel group having a priority of r u  for an available channel, in step  405 . Note that to improve performance each base station should perform the search through the channels using its own particular order that is independently and randomly chosen. As coordination with regard to selection of channels is possible within a cell, since, at least in one embodiment of the invention, all the sectors of a cell are controlled by the same base station, the base station searches for, and considers as available, only an uplink channel that is not already being used inside the cell for which the call request was generated. 
     Conditional branch point  407  tests to determine if an available channel was found during the search. If the test result in step  407  is NO, indicating a channel was not found in the channel group indicated by the current value of r u , control passes to conditional branch point  409 , which tests to determine if r u &lt;G, i.e., to test if all of the channel groups on the uplink priority list have been searched. If the test result in step  409  is YES, indicating there remains channel groups on the uplink priority list that have not yet been searched, then, in accordance with an aspect of the invention, control passes to step  411  which increments r u  so that it indicates the next lower priority channel group on the uplink priority list of the sector. Control then passes back to step  405  to search through the next lower priority channel group on the uplink priority list of the sector, in accordance with an aspect of the invention, and the process continues as described above. 
     If the test result in step  409  is NO, indicating that all the channel groups on the uplink priority list have been searched, control passes to step  413 , in which the call request is blocked. The process then exits in step  415 . 
     If the test result in step  407  is YES, indicating a channel has been found for use by the uplink, control passes to step  417 , in which the channel that has been found is assigned for use by the uplink of the requested call. 
     Thereafter, in step  419 , a counter for the downlink priority lists, r d , is initialized to 1, so that it indicates to the downlink channel group having the highest priority. Next, a search is performed in the downlink channel group having a priority of r d  for an available channel, in step  421 . Note that to improve performance each base station should also perform this search through the channels using its own particular order that is independently and randomly chosen. In the same manner as for the uplink, as coordination with regard to selection of channels is possible within a cell, since, at least in one embodiment of the invention, all the sectors of a cell are controlled by the same base station, the base station searches for, and considers as available, only a downlink channel that is not already being used inside the cell for which the call request was generated. Conditional branch point  423  tests to determine if an available channel was found during the search. If the test result in step  423  is NO, indicating a channel was not found in channel group indicated by the current value of r d  control passes to conditional branch point  425 , which tests to determine if r d &lt;G. i.e., to test if all of the channel groups on the downlink priority list have been searched. If the test result in step  425  is YES, indicating there remains channel groups on the downlink priority list that have not yet been searched, then, in accordance with an aspect of the invention, control passes to step  427  which increments r d  so that it indicates the next lower priority channel group on the downlink priority list of the sector. Control then passes back to step  421  to search through the next lower priority channel group on the downlink priority list of the sector, in accordance with an aspect of the invention, and the process continues as described above. 
     If the test result in step  425  is NO, indicating that all the channel groups on the downlink priority list have been searched, control passes to step  413 , in which the call request is blocked. The process then exits in step  415 . 
     If the test result in step  423  is YES, indicating a channel has been found for use by the downlink, control passes to step  433 , in which the channel that has been found is assigned for use by the downlink of the requested call. The process then exits in step  415 . 
     FIG. 5 shows an exemplary set of uplink priority lists for a locality based on a reuse cluster size of 7, with a fixed interference cluster size and a relative interference cluster size of 19, and in which each cell has eight sectors. The center of each cell is marked with an identifier of the primary uplink channel group for that cell. In this particular example, the channels of each cell&#39;s primary uplink channel group are not allocated to the various sectors within the cell. Thus, each sector has as its primary uplink channel group the primary uplink channel group of the cell in which it is located. 
     In each sector there is shown the prioritized list of uplink channel groups for that sector. Although ideally the lists would be shown in descending order in a single dimension, because of space constraints the prioritization is by line from top to bottom, with the highest priority being at the top, and within a single line from left to right, with the left having a higher priority. Thus, for example, for the center cell which has as its primary uplink channel group uplink channel group 0, its upper rightmost sector&#39;s uplink priority list is 0, 2, 4, 5, 1, 3, 6, with 0 having the highest priority and 6 having the lowest. 
     The example of FIG. 5 is based on a simulation model and employs the assumption that there is a uniform distribution of the terminals within the cells. Note that, notwithstanding the fact that each sector has as its primary uplink channel group the primary uplink channel group of the cell in which it is located, the various prioritized lists of uplink channel groups for each sector within a cell are different as they are a function of the location of the sector.