Abstract:
The present invention is a visual prosthesis including a visor with an embedded camera and an optical filter to limit light entering the lens of the camera. This invention will allow use of custom filters to limit light intensity or certain light frequencies sent to the camera of the visual prosthesis in a variety of brightness conditions which will remove glare. It will allow modification of the color of the light sent to camera of the visual prosthesis to respond to different environments.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/097,449, for Selectable Filters for a Visual Prosthesis, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 61/330,098 for Selectable Filter for a Visual Prosthesis filed on Apr. 30, 2010, and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/893,260, filed Aug. 15, 2007 for Visor for a Visual Prosthesis, published as 2008/0154336, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. 
    
    
     GOVERNMENT RIGHTS NOTICE 
     This invention was made with government support under grant No. R24EY12893-01, awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention. 
    
    
     FIELD 
     The present disclosure is generally directed to neural stimulation and more specifically to a visual prosthetic apparatus for retinal stimulation. 
     BACKGROUND 
     As intraocular surgical techniques have advanced, it has become possible to apply stimulation on small groups and even on individual retinal cells to generate focused phosphenes through devices implanted within the eye itself. This has sparked renewed interest in developing methods and apparatuses to aid the visually impaired. Specifically, great effort has been expended in the area of intraocular retinal prosthesis devices in an effort to restore vision in cases where blindness is caused by photoreceptor degenerative retinal diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa and age related macular degeneration which affect millions of people worldwide. 
     Neural tissue can be artificially stimulated and activated by prosthetic devices that pass pulses of electrical current through electrodes on such a device. The passage of current causes changes in electrical potentials across visual neuronal membranes, which can initiate visual neuron action potentials, which are the means of information transfer in the nervous system. 
     Based on this mechanism, it is possible to input information into the nervous system by coding the information as a sequence of electrical pulses which are relayed to the nervous system via the prosthetic device. In this way, it is possible to provide artificial sensations including vision. 
     One typical application of neural tissue stimulation is in the rehabilitation of the blind. Some forms of blindness involve selective loss of the light sensitive transducers of the retina. Other retinal neurons remain viable, however, and may be activated in the manner described above by placement of a prosthetic electrode device on the inner (toward the vitreous) retinal surface (epiretinal). This placement must be mechanically stable, minimize the distance between the device electrodes and the visual neurons, and avoid undue compression of the visual neurons. 
     In 1986, Bullara (U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,481) patented an electrode assembly for surgical implantation on a nerve. The matrix was silicone with embedded iridium electrodes. The assembly fit around a nerve to stimulate it. 
     Dawson and Radtke stimulated cat&#39;s retina by direct electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell layer. These experimenters placed nine and then fourteen electrodes upon the inner retinal layer (i.e., primarily the ganglion cell layer) of two cats. Their experiments suggested that electrical stimulation of the retina with 30 to 100 uA current resulted in visual cortical responses. These experiments were carried out with needle-shaped electrodes that penetrated the surface of the retina (see also U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,933 to Michelson). 
     The Michelson &#39;933 apparatus includes an array of photosensitive devices on its surface that are connected to a plurality of electrodes positioned on the opposite surface of the device to stimulate the retina. These electrodes are disposed to form an array similar to a “bed of nails” having conductors which impinge directly on the retina to stimulate the retinal cells. U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,049 to Byers describes spike electrodes for neural stimulation. Each spike electrode pierces neural tissue for better electrical contact. U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,088 to Norman describes an array of spike electrodes for cortical stimulation. Each spike pierces cortical tissue for better electrical contact. 
     The art of implanting an intraocular prosthetic device to electrically stimulate the retina was advanced with the introduction of retinal tacks in retinal surgery. De Juan, et al. at Duke University Eye Center inserted retinal tacks into retinas in an effort to reattach retinas that had detached from the underlying choroid, which is the source of blood supply for the outer retina and thus the photoreceptors. See, e.g., de Juan, et al., 99 Am. J. Ophthalmol 272 (1985). These retinal tacks have proved to be biocompatible and remain embedded in the retina, with the choroid/sclera, effectively pinning the retina against the choroid and the posterior aspects of the globe. Retinal tacks are one way to attach a retinal array to the retina. U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,844 to de Juan describes a flat electrode array placed against the retina for visual stimulation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,155 to Humayun describes a retinal prosthesis for use with the flat retinal array described in de Juan. 
     Off the shelf miniature cameras used in visual prostheses, or other common miniaturized cameras suitable for mounting in a pair of glasses, have difficulty responding to high intensity lighting conditions and different cameras can have different color responses, which is not ideal. Electronic compensation is not possible in some cases where the camera is saturated. Further electronic compensation requires processing time that can be better allocated to other visual prosthesis functions. 
     SUMMARY 
     The present invention is a visual prosthesis including a visor with an embedded camera and an optical filter to limit light entering the lens of the camera. This invention will allow use of custom filters to limit light intensity or certain light frequencies sent to the camera of the visual prosthesis in a variety of brightness conditions which will remove glare. It will allow modification of the color of the light sent to camera of the visual prosthesis to respond to different environments. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a schematic view of the visor of the preferred visual prosthesis. 
         FIGS. 2 and 3  show perspective views of the preferred visor of a visual prosthetic apparatus. 
         FIG. 4  is a shade wheel for an alternative embodiment. 
         FIG. 5  is the alternative visor using a shade wheel. 
         FIG. 6  shows a perspective view of the implantable portion of the visual prosthesis. 
         FIG. 7  is a side view of the implantable portion of the visual prosthesis. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The glasses or visor  1  may have a sliding lens cover  7  that can be placed in front of the camera  3  lens on the visor  1  as shown in  FIG. 1 . The camera may be mounted in the bridge of the glasses. The sliding lens cover  7  may be made of dark shade transparent material to limit the intensity of light falling on the camera  3  lens. Based on the ambient light conditions, the user can utilize this feature to limit bright light. The sliding cover  7  material may provide a choice of ND (Normal Density), Graded Neutral Density, normal density plus ultraviolet (ND+UV), Color filters, high contrast filters, or there filters as are commonly known for use for eye glasses. Desired available filters can be combined into a single lens cover and placed linearly side by side. Incorporating a longer sliding travel, each section of filter can come in front of the lens for desired effect. 
       FIGS. 2 and 3  show two different perspective views of an external portion of a visual prosthetic apparatus according to the present disclosure. ‘External’ is here meant to indicate that the portion is external to the human body, and not implanted therein. The external portion includes the visor  1  and is adapted to be used in combination with an implantable portion  23 , shown in  FIGS. 6 and 7 . Turning to  FIGS. 2 and 3 , the external portion  1  comprises a frame  2  holding a camera  3 , an external coil arrangement  4  and a mounting system  5  for the external coil arrangement  4 . The external coil arrangement  4  comprises external transmitting and receiving radio-frequency (RF) coils adapted to be used together and communicate with an internal RF coil (later shown in  FIGS. 6 and 7 ). The mounting system  5  also encloses the RF circuitry for modulating, demodulating, transmitting, and receiving an RF signal. External coil arrangement  4  and mounting system  5  are connected by a flexible connector  6 . 
     Alternatively the filter lens cover can be hinged from the top of the frame and flipped down when needed (not shown). Alternatively the lens may be hinged to the side of the camera and flipped sideway when needed (also not shown). Referring to  FIGS. 4 and 5 , alternatively the filters can be arranged on a composite circular lens cover in pie chart segment as shown in  FIG. 4 .  FIG. 5  shows the composite circular lens cover  8  in front of the camera  4  lens. The composite circular lens cover  8  is attached to a bearing at its center and mounted to glasses. The rotating circular lens cover  8  will allow the desired filter section to be placed in front of the camera  3  lens. Another Alternate embodiment is to integrate the actual lens cover mounted into the glasses frame so that it is not visible from the front. The integration can be applicable for both linear travel lens cover ( FIG. 1 ) as well as rotating lens cover ( FIG. 5 ). 
       FIG. 6  shows a perspective view of an implantable portion  23  of a retinal prosthesis as disclosed. An electrode array  24  is mounted by a retinal tack or similar means to the epiretinal surface. The electrode array  24  is electrically coupled by a cable  25 , which can pierce the sclera and be electrically coupled to an electronics package  26  external to the sclera. Electronic package  26  includes the RF receiver and electrode drivers. 
     The electronics package  26  can be electrically coupled to the secondary inductive coil  27 . In one aspect, the secondary inductive coil  27  is made from wound wire. Alternatively, the secondary inductive coil may be made from a thin film polymer sandwich with wire traces deposited between layers of thin film polymer. The secondary coil receives power and data from the primary coil  4  which is external to the body. The electronics package  26  and secondary inductive coil  27  are held together by a molded body  28 . The molded body  28  may also include suture tabs  29 . The molded body narrows in a fan tail  31  to form a strap  30  which surrounds the sclera and holds the molded body  28 , secondary inductive coil  27 , and electronics package  26  in place. The molded body  28 , suture tabs  29  and strap  30  are preferably an integrated unit made of silicone elastomer. Silicone elastomer can be formed in a pre-curved shape to match the curvature of a typical sclera. Furthermore, silicone remains flexible enough to accommodate implantation and to adapt to variations in the curvature of an individual sclera. In one aspect, the secondary inductive coil  27  and molded body  28  are oval shaped, and in this way, a strap  30  can better support the oval shaped coil. 
     The entire implantable portion  23  is attached to and supported by the sclera of a subject. The eye moves constantly. The eye moves to scan a scene and also has a jitter motion to prevent image stabilization. Even though such motion is useless in the blind, it often continues long after a person has lost their sight. By placing the device under the rectus muscles with the electronics package in an area of fatty tissue between the rectus muscles, eye motion does not cause any flexing which might fatigue, and eventually damage, the device. 
       FIG. 7  shows a side view of the implantable portion of the retinal prosthesis, in particular, emphasizing the fan tail  31 . When the retinal prosthesis is implanted, the strap  30  has to be passed under the eye muscles to surround the sclera. The secondary inductive coil  27  and molded body  28  should also follow the strap under the lateral rectus muscle on the side of the sclera. The implantable portion  23  of the retinal prosthesis is very delicate. It is easy to tear the molded body  28  or break wires in the secondary inductive coil  27 . In order to allow the molded body  28  to slide smoothly under the lateral rectus muscle, the molded body is shaped in the form of a fan tail  31  on the end opposite the electronics package  26 . Element  32  shows a retention sleeve, while elements  33  and  34  show holes for surgical positioning and a ramp for surgical positioning, respectively. 
     In summary, a visual prosthetic apparatus is provided. The apparatus provides a means for adjusting the light received by the camera. While the invention has been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, it is understood that numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.