Abstract:
A system is provided for use with circuit layout design data having a set of differential pairs and a set of bond wire pairs. A layout portion can receive the circuit layout design data. A crosstalk calculating portion can determine a first amount of crosstalk in a circuit corresponding to the circuit layout design data. A modifier can modify the circuit layout design data into modified circuit layout design data such that one of the set of differential pairs and the set of bond wire pairs includes a crossover. The crosstalk calculating portion can further determine a second amount of crosstalk in a circuit corresponding to the modified circuit layout design data. An optimizer can compare the first amount of crosstalk with the second amount of crosstalk to generate optimized circuit layout design data. A layout designer can output the optimized circuit layout design data.

Description:
BACKGROUND 
     The operating speeds of semiconductor devices have continued to increase and continuously push the limit of conventional packaging technology. 
     To support the ever increasing operation speed of semiconductor devices, a differential pair is often used. A differential pair is a pair of conductors used for differential signaling. A differential pair reduces crosstalk and electromagnetic interference and can provide constant and/or known characteristic impedance. Furthermore, a differential pair enables impedance matching techniques used for high-speed signal transmission lines. Non-limiting examples of a differential pair include twisted-pair, microstrip and stripline. 
     A differential pair reduces the total current between the two conductors of the differential pair, as Kirchhoffs Law predicts the total current as being zero through a cross section of the differential pair. The condition for emitting zero electromagnetic interference representing zero crosstalk is for zero total current through the cross section of the differential pair. However, in real world situations, zero current is not achieved, resulting in crosstalk between the conductors of a differential pair. 
     Additionally, crosstalk may occur between differential pairs as a result of second-order effects due to the finite impedance of the current source and impedance mismatch between the devices. For this case, the two conductors of the differential pair may be considered as a dipole with coupling on the order of l/r 2  or l/r 4 , where r is the distance between lines of differential pairs. To reduce crosstalk, the effects associated with second-order effects need to be reduced. 
     The differential to differential pair crosstalk in electronic equipment limits its applicability to higher than 5 GHz types of Serializer/Deserializer (Serdes) designs. The crosstalk between differential pairs needs to be kept to a level of around −60 dB or less in order to minimize its impact on the channels ability to receive a greatly attenuated signal. 
     Modem signal channels at high speed can introduce an attenuation of 40 dB or more. To properly receive such a signal in the presence of a fully duplexed communication stream, a cross-coupling immunity of 60 dB is needed for reliable signal reception. 
     The crosstalk between differential pairs can be calculated. 
     In order to determine the crosstalk between differential pairs, the mutual inductance is calculated. The mutual inductance by a filamentary circuit i on another filamentary (consisting of wires and rods) circuit is given by the double integral Neumann formula as give by Equation 1 below: 
     
       
         
           
             
               
                 
                   
                     M 
                     ij 
                   
                   = 
                   
                     
                       
                         μ 
                         0 
                       
                       
                         
                           4 
                           ⁢ 
                           
                               
                           
                           ⁢ 
                           π 
                         
                         ⁢ 
                         
                             
                         
                       
                     
                     ⁢ 
                     
                       
                         ∮ 
                         
                           C 
                           i 
                         
                       
                       ⁢ 
                       
                         
                           ∮ 
                           
                             C 
                             j 
                           
                         
                         ⁢ 
                         
                           
                             
                               ds 
                               i 
                             
                             · 
                             
                               ds 
                               j 
                             
                           
                           
                              
                             
                               R 
                               ij 
                             
                              
                           
                         
                       
                     
                   
                 
               
               
                 
                   ( 
                   1 
                   ) 
                 
               
             
           
         
       
     
     Where μ 0  denotes the magnetic constant (4π×10 −7  H/m), C i  and C j  are the curves spanned by the wires, R ij  is the distance between two points. 
     The currents associated with the positive and negative conductors of a differential have the same magnitude of current but traversing in opposing directions. 
     Differential pair to differential pair crosstalk is a technology limiter that causes system failure in the form of signal detection error—increasing the system jitter and causing the signal detection eye pattern to close. An eye pattern, also known as an eye diagram, is a presentation (e.g. oscilloscope display) of a digital data signal as received at a receiver. Furthermore, the received signal is repetitively sampled and applied to the vertical input, while the data rate is used to trigger the horizontal sweep. 
     Reduction of this crosstalk is possible using a technique known as orthogonal crossovers. The use of crossovers between differential pairs introduces significant discontinuities in the transmission lines that make up the differential pairs. A significant source of the discontinuities are a result of the vias that are used to move the pair from one side to the other. A via in an integrated circuit or printed circuit board is a mechanism for transferring a signal from one signal layer to another signal layer. 
     Alternate methods used to reduce the reflections from the crossovers include designing the via structure in such a way as to match the characteristic impedance of the line. 
       FIGS. 1A-C  illustrates an example conventional transmission line system  100 . 
     Transmission line system  100  includes a differential pair  102  and a differential pair  104 . 
     Non-limiting examples of a differential pair include twisted-pair, microstrip and stripline. Differential pairs  102  and  104  provide a transmission medium for transferring an electrical signal. A differential pair reduces crosstalk and electromagnetic interference and can provide constant and/or known characteristic impedance. Furthermore, a differential pair enables impedance matching techniques used for high-speed signal transmission lines. 
     Differential pair  102  includes a positive signal trace  106  and a negative signal trace  108 . Differential pair  104  includes a positive signal trace  110  and a negative signal trace  112 . In some embodiments, the positive signal associated with positive signal trace  106  is equal and opposite to the negative signal associated with negative signal trace  108 . In other embodiments, the positive signal associated with positive signal trace  106  is different in magnitude to the negative signal associated with negative signal trace  108 . In theory, for embodiments with equal but opposite signals associated with positive signal trace  106  and negative signal trace  108 , the radiant electromagnetic field generated by the positive signal in positive signal trace  106  is cancelled by the equal and opposite radiant electromagnetic field generated by the negative signal in negative signal trace  108 . Similarly, for some embodiments, the positive signal in positive signal trace  110  is equal and opposite to the negative signal in negative signal trace  112 . In theory, radiant electromagnetic field generated by the positive signal in positive signal trace  110  is cancelled by the equal and opposite radiant electromagnetic field generated by the negative signal in negative signal trace  112 . 
     The radiant effects of current through a differential pair may negatively affect the signals in an adjacent (or nearby) differential pair. In particular, a current traveling through one signal trace (or path) may affect the current traveling through another signal trace, wherein the magnitude is a function of distance. For example, current traveling through positive signal trace  106  will affect current traveling through positive signal trace  110 , and will also affect current traveling through negative signal trace  112 , but by a slightly less amount. Further, current traveling through negative signal trace  108  will affect current traveling through positive signal trace  110 , and will also affect current traveling through negative signal trace  112 , but by a slightly less amount. The overall effect is known as crosstalk interference, or crosstalk. 
     The total effects of crosstalk may be determined by integrating the effect along a length of the crosstalk, in this instance a length  114  noted as L. To simplify the discussion, first consider the effects of positive signal trace  106  and negative signal trace  108  on positive signal trace  110 . Then, consider the effects of positive signal trace  106  and negative signal trace  108  on negative signal trace  112 . This will be further described with reference to  FIGS. 1B-C . 
       FIG. 1B  takes into account the effects of currents of positive signal trace  106  and negative signal trace  108 , as felt by positive signal trace  110 . In this example, negative signal trace  108  and is separated from positive signal trace  110  by a distance  116  noted as r 1 , whereas positive signal trace  106  and is separated from positive signal trace  110  by a distance  118  noted as r 2 . The radiant effects of currents of positive signal trace  106 , as felt by positive signal trace  110 , are opposite to the radiant effects of currents of negative signal trace  108 , as felt by positive signal trace  110 . However, distance  116  is smaller than distance  118 . Accordingly, the radiant effects of currents of negative signal trace  108 , as felt by positive signal trace  110  are greater than the radiant effects of currents of positive signal trace  106 . 
       FIG. 1C  takes into account the effects of currents of positive signal trace  106  and negative signal trace  108 , as felt by negative signal trace  112 . In this example, negative signal trace  108  and is separated from negative signal trace  112  by distance  118  (again noted as r 2 ), whereas positive signal trace  106  and is separated from negative signal trace  112  by a distance  120  noted as r 3 . The radiant effects of currents of positive signal trace  106 , as felt by negative signal trace  112 , are opposite to the radiant effects of currents of negative signal trace  108 , as felt by negative signal trace  112 . However, distance  118  is smaller than distance  120 . Accordingly, the radiant effects of currents of negative signal trace  108 , as felt by negative signal trace  112  are greater than the radiant effects of currents of positive signal trace  106  as felt by negative signal trace  112 . 
     Comparing the situations illustrated in  FIGS. 1B-C , it is clear that the radiant effects of currents of positive signal trace  106  as felt by positive signal trace  110  (as shown in  FIG. 1B ) is equal and opposite to the radiant effects of currents of negative signal trace  108  as felt by negative signal trace  112  (as shown in  FIG. 1C ). Accordingly, the radiant effects effectively cancel. 
     The remaining radiant effects are therefore drawn to the radiant effect of current of negative signal trace  108  as felt by positive signal trace  110  (as shown in  FIG. 1B ) in addition to the radiant effect of current of positive signal trace  106  as felt by negative signal trace  112  (as shown in  FIG. 1C ). Ideally, the current in positive signal trace  110  should be equal and opposite to the current in negative signal trace  112 . However, radiant effect of current of negative signal trace  108  alter the current in positive signal trace  110 , whereas the radiant effect of current of positive signal trace  106  will alter the negative signal trace  112 . For simplicity of explanation, let the “alteration” the current in positive signal trace  110  be an attenuation, and let of the “alteration” the current in positive signal trace  110  additionally be an attenuation. The attenuation of the signal in negative signal trace  112  is less than the attenuation of the signal in positive signal trace  110  because r 2 &lt;r 3 . The difference in interference creates a distortion in the signal if positive signal trace  110  and negative signal trace  112  are attenuated differently. Even though the interference may be minor, the interference calculation is integrated over the length of distance  114  or L as described by Equation 1. 
     In order to reduce crosstalk, conventional systems cross or switch conductors of a differential pair in order to balance the coupling between the differential pairs which will be further discussed with reference to  FIG. 2 . 
       FIG. 2  illustrates an example conventional transmission line system  200 , wherein one set of signal traces include a crossover. 
     As shown in the figure, prior to a crossover point  206 , positive signal trace  110  is separated from negative signal trace  108  by distance  116  (indicated by r 1 ), whereas negative signal trace  112  is separated from positive signal trace  106  by distance  120  (indicated by r 3 ). After crossover point  206 , negative signal trace  112  is separated from negative signal trace  108  by distance  116  (indicated by r 1 ), whereas positive signal trace  110  is separated from positive signal trace  106  by distance  120  (indicated by r 3 ). For purposes of discussion, let crossover point  206  be in the middle of distance L. 
     The radiant effects of the current of negative signal trace  108  as felt by positive signal trace  110  from the left of the figure to crossover point  206  is equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to the radiant effects of the current of negative signal trace  108  as felt by negative signal trace  112  crossover point  206  to the right of the figure. Accordingly, the radiant effects of the current from the left side of the figure to the right side of the figure cancel each other out. Similarly, the radiant effects of the current of positive signal trace  106  as felt by negative signal trace  112  from the left of the figure to crossover point  206  is equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to the radiant effects of current of positive signal trace  106  as felt by positive signal trace  110  crossover point  206  to the right of the figure. Accordingly, the radiant effects of the current from the left side of the figure to the right side of the figure cancel each other out. Canceling the radiant effects is the purpose or goal of performing the crossover in differential pairs. Conventionally, crossovers are formed by “tunneling” below one of the signal traces. 
     Similar to performing crossovers with differential pairs, crossovers may be performed with bond wires as discussed with respect to  FIGS. 3A-5D . 
     Crosstalk interference may additionally originate from other portions of a semiconductor device, namely bond wires. 
     A common semiconductor component encapsulates a semiconductor device in a package and uses bond wires to form a connection between the bond pads associated with the semiconductor device and the bond pads associated with the package. Bond wires may be adhered or welded to bond pads using some combination of heat, pressure and ultrasonic energy. 
     In a wirebond design the bond wire pair to bond wire pair coupling ranges from −17 dB to −38 dB for a range of spacing from 1(K) microns to 550 microns between the pairs. For a multi-channel Serdes link, the pairs need to be spaced at 600 microns or closer to get a reasonable number of channels into a given design. This is generally the case for wirebond designs, as wirebond designs are typically limited to 25 high speed input/output signal connections. 
     The standard solution for reducing bond wire to bond wire coupling is to space the pairs further and further apart. However, today&#39;s modem semiconductor die designs with large numbers of high speed input/output signals do not provide enough space to support −60 dB coupling. 
     Aspects of the conventional technology for bond wires associated with semiconductor packaging will now be described in greater detail with reference to  FIGS. 3A-5D . 
       FIG. 3A  illustrates a conventional bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package. 
     A bond wire configuration  300  includes a semiconductor device  302 , a package  304 , a differential pair  305  and a differential pair  306 . Differential pair  305  includes a bond wire  307  and a bond wire  308 . Differential pair  306  includes a bond wire  310  and a bond wire  312 . Semiconductor device  302  includes a bond pad  314 , a bond pad  316 , a bond pad  318  and a bond pad  320 . Package  304  includes a bond pad  322 , a bond pad  324 , a bond pad  326  and a bond pad  328 . 
     A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  314  connects to a corresponding signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  322  via bond wire  307 . A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  316  connects to a signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  324  via bond wire  308 . A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  318  connects to a signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  326  via bond wire  310 . A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  320  connects to a signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  328  via bond wire  312 . 
     Semiconductor device  302  provides electrical circuitry for electrical operations. Non-limiting examples for semiconductor device  302  include microprocessor and memory. Package  304  provides carriage and protection for semiconductor device  302 . Differential pair  305  provides a transmission medium for transferring an electrical signal. Differential pair  306  provides a transmission medium for transferring an electrical signal. Bond pad  314 .  316 ,  318  and  320  provide electrical connection to circuitry associated with semiconductor device  302 . Bond pad  322 ,  324 ,  326  and bond pad  328  provide electrical connection to leads associated with package  304 . As a non-limiting example, leads may be surface mount capable. 
     In operation, electrical signals traverse from semiconductor device  302  to bond pads  314 ,  316 ,  318 , and  320 . Furthermore, electrical signals traverse from bond pads  314 ,  316 ,  318  and  320  to bond pad  322 ,  324 ,  326 , and  328  via bond wire  307 ,  308 ,  310  and  312 , respectively. Furthermore, electrical signals traverse from bond pad  322 ,  324 ,  326  and  328  to electrical leads. Furthermore, electrical signals traverse from electrical leads to other electrical and electronic devices located external to package  304 . Furthermore, crosstalk may occur between the bond wires and cause signaling errors. Crosstalk is a phenomenon by which a signal transmitted on one circuit or channel creates an unwanted effect in another circuit or channel. Crosstalk is typically caused by unwanted capacitive, inductive or conductive coupling from one circuit, part of a circuit or channel, to another. In general, the closer in distance channels are collocated, the greater the chance of experiencing crosstalk and conversely, the further the channels are collocated, the smaller the chance of experiencing crosstalk. 
     As an example, the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  308  and between bond wire  310  and bond wire  312  at semiconductor device  302  is configured for 70 microns. Furthermore, the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  308  and between bond wire  310  and bond wire  312  at package  304  is  100 ) microns. Furthermore, the distance between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at semiconductor device  302  is configured for 400 microns. Furthermore, the distance between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at package  304  is 400 microns. Furthermore, the distance between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at semiconductor device  302  is 70 microns. 
     In order to reduce issues associated with crosstalk, the separation between bond wires may be increased as will be discussed with reference to  FIG. 3B . 
       FIG. 3B  illustrates a conventional bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire separation is increased over the separation depicted in  FIG. 3A . 
     As shown in  FIG. 3B  (and similar to the situation of  FIG. 3A ), the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  308  at semiconductor device  302  remains 70 microns and the separation between bond wire  307  and  308  at package  304  remains 100 microns. 
     However, as shown in  FIG. 3B , the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at semiconductor device  302  is 310 microns. This is a 90 micron decrease (22.5%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A . As shown in  FIG. 3B  (similar to the situation of  FIG. 3A ), the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at package  304  is 400 microns. The separation between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at semiconductor device  302  is 170 microns. This is a 100 micron increase (142%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A . As shown in  FIG. 3B , the separation between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at package  304  is 200 microns. This is a 100 micron (100%) increase in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A . 
     The increased separation of bond wires, as shown in  FIG. 3B , provided less signal interference. As an example, the noise margin for the configuration as illustrated in  FIG. 3B  may experience a 10 dB improvement over  FIG. 3A , as crosstalk is reduced due to the increased distance between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310 . 
       FIG. 3C  illustrates a conventional bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire separation is further increased over the separation depicted in  FIG. 3B . 
     As shown in  FIG. 3C  (and similar to the situation of  FIGS. 3A-B ), the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  308  at semiconductor device  302  remains 70 microns and the separation between bond wire  307  and  308  at package  304  remains 100 microns. 
     As further shown in  FIG. 3C , the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at semiconductor device  302  is 410 microns. This is a 10 micron increase (2.5%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A  and a 100 micron increase (32%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3B . As shown in  FIG. 3C , the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at package  304  is 300 microns. This is a  100 ) micron increase (25%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIGS. 3A-B . As shown in  FIG. 3C , the separation between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at semiconductor device  302  is 270 microns. This is a 200 micron increase (285%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A  and a 100 micron (58%) increase in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3B . As shown in  FIG. 3C , the separation between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at package  304  is 400 microns. This is a 300 micron increase (300%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A  and a 200 micron increase (200%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3B . 
     The noise margin for the configuration as illustrated in  FIG. 3C  may experience a 6 dB improvement over  FIG. 38 , as crosstalk is reduced due to the increased distance between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310 . 
     In order to reduce issues associated with crosstalk, the separation between bond wires may be increased as will be discussed with reference to  FIG. 3D . 
       FIG. 3D  illustrates a conventional bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire separation is increased over the separation depicted in  FIG. 3C . 
     As shown in  FIG. 3D  (and similar to the situation of  FIGS. 3A-B ), the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  308  at semiconductor device  302  remains 70 microns and the separation between bond wire  307  and  308  at package  304  remains 100 microns. 
     As further shown in  FIG. 3D , the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at semiconductor device  302  is 510 microns. This is a 110 micron increase (27.5%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A , a 200 micron increase (64.5%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3B  and a 100 micron increase (24.3%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3C . As shown in  FIG. 3D , the separation between bond wire  307  and bond wire  312  at package  304  is 600 microns. This is a 200 micron increase (50%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIGS. 3A-B  and a 100 micron increase (25%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3C . The separation between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at semiconductor device  302  is 370 microns. This is a 300 micron increase (429%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A , a 200 micron (118%) increase in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3B  and a 100 micron (37%) increase in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3C . As shown in  FIG. 3D , the separation between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310  at package  304  is 400 microns. This is a 300 micron increase (300%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3A , a 200 micron increase (200%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3B  and the same distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 3C . 
     As an example, the noise margin for the configuration as illustrated in  FIG. 3C  may experience a 5 dB improvement over  FIG. 3C , as crosstalk is reduced due to the increased distance between bond wire  308  and bond wire  310 . 
     Clearly, as described above with reference to  FIGS. 3A-D , crosstalk may be minimized by increasing the spacing between bond wires. To minimize real estate on semiconductor device  302  package  304  bond wires should ideally be disposed as close to one another as possible. As such, an appropriate spacing between the bond wires must be determined. 
     Other bond wire configurations may be used in an attempt to reduce coupling. These include overlapping bond wires, as will be described with reference to  FIGS. 4A-C   
       FIG. 4A  illustrates a conventional overlapped bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package. 
     A bond wire configuration  400  includes a semiconductor device  402 , a package  404 , a bond wire  407 , a bond wire  408 , a bond wire  410  and a bond wire  412 . Semiconductor device  402  includes a bond pad  414 , a bond pad  416 , a bond pad  418  and a bond pad  420 . Package  404  includes a bond pad  422 , a bond pad  424 , a bond pad  426  and a bond pad  428 . 
     A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  414  connects to a signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  422  via bond wire  407 . A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  416  connects to a signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  424  via bond wire  408 . A signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  418  connects to a signal (or power) line (not shown) on bond pad  426  via bond wire  410 . Bond pad  420  connects to bond pad  428  via bond wire  412 . 
     The separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  408  and between bond wire  410  and bond wire  412  at semiconductor device  402  is configured for 0 microns. Similarly, the separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  408  and between bond wire  410  and bond wire  412  at package  404  is 0 microns. The distance between bond wire  407  and bond wire  412  at semiconductor device  402  is configured for 140 microns. The distance between bond wire  407  and bond wire  412  at package  404  is 200 microns. Similarly, the distance between bond wire  408  and bond wire  410  at semiconductor device  402  is 140 microns and the distance between bond wire  408  and bond wire  410  at package  404  is 200 microns. 
     Semiconductor device  402  provides electrical circuitry for electrical operations. Non-limiting examples for semiconductor device  402  include microprocessor and memory. Package  404  provides carriage and protection for semiconductor device  402 . Bond pad  414 ,  416 ,  418  and  420  provide electrical connection to circuitry associated with semiconductor device  402 . Bond pad  422 ,  424 ,  426  and bond pad  428  provide electrical connection to leads associated with package  404 . As a non-limiting example, leads may be surface mount capable. 
     In operation, electrical signals traverse from semiconductor device  402  to bond pads  414 ,  416 ,  418  and  420 . Furthermore, electrical signals traverse from bond pads  414 ,  416 ,  418  and  420  to bond pad  422 ,  424 ,  426  and  428  via bond wire  407 ,  408 ,  410  and  412 , respectively. Furthermore, electrical signals traverse from bond pad  422 ,  424 ,  426  and  428  to electrical leads. Furthermore, electrical signals traverse from electrical leads to other electrical and electronic devices located external to package  404 . Furthermore, crosstalk may occur between the bond wires and cause signaling errors. 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  407  and  408  and the pair of bond wires  410  and  412  is calculated as −16.76 dB. 
     Similar to differential pairs, as discussed above with reference to  FIGS. 1-2 , in order to reduce issues associated with crosstalk in bond wires, the separation between bond wires may be increased, as will be discussed with reference to  FIG. 4B . 
       FIG. 4B  illustrates a conventional overlapped bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire separation is increased over the separation depicted in  FIG. 4A . 
     The separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  408  at semiconductor device  402  remains 0 microns and the separation between bond wire  407  and  408  at package  404  remains 0 microns as described with reference to  FIG. 4A . 
     The separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  412  at semiconductor device  402  is 340 microns. This is a 200 micron increase (143%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 4A . As shown in  FIG. 48 , the separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  412  at package  404  is 400 microns. This is a 200 micron increase (100%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 4A . 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  407  and  408  and the pair of bond wires  410  and  412  is calculated as −27.21 dB, which is an improvement of −10.45 dB over the configuration of  FIG. 4A . The increased separation between the bond wires increases the noise margin, decreases the coupling and decreases crosstalk. 
     In order to further reduce issues associated with crosstalk, the separation between bond wires may be further increased as will be discussed with reference to  FIG. 4C . 
       FIG. 4C  illustrates a conventional overlapped bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire separation is increased over the separation depicted in  FIG. 4B . 
     The separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  408  at semiconductor device  402  remains 0 microns and the separation between bond wire  407  and  408  at package  404  remains 0 microns as described with reference to  FIG. 4A . 
     The separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  412  at semiconductor device  402  is 540 microns. This is a  400 ) micron increase (285%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 4A  and a 200 micron increase (58.8%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 4B . As shown in  FIG. 4C , the separation between bond wire  407  and bond wire  412  at package  404  is 600 microns. This is a 400 micron increase (200%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 4A  and a 200 micron increase (50%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIG. 4B . 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  407  and  408  and the pair of bond wires  410  and  412  pair is calculated as −32.13 dB, which is an improvement of −4.92 dB over the configuration of  FIG. 4B . The increased separation between the bond wires increases the noise margin, decreases the coupling and decreases crosstalk. 
       FIG. 4C  illustrates a conventional overlapped bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire separation is increased over the separation depicted in  FIG. 4B  resulting in increased noise margin and decreased crosstalk. 
     Clearly, as described above with reference to  FIGS. 6A-C , crosstalk may be minimized by increasing the spacing between bond wires. To minimize real estate on semiconductor device  402  package  404  bond wires should ideally be disposed as close to one another as possible. As such, an appropriate spacing between the bond wires must be determined. 
     Similar to methods of reducing crosstalk for differential pairs as discussed above with reference to  FIGS. 1-2 , crosstalk originating from bond wires may be reduced with orthogonal crossovers. This will be discussed with reference to  FIGS. 5A-D   
       FIG. 5A  illustrates a conventional crossed bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package. 
     A bond wire configuration  500  includes a semiconductor device  502 , a package  504 , a differential pair  505  and a differential pair  506 . Differential pair SOS includes a bond wire  507  and a bond wire  508 . Differential pair  506  includes a bond wire  510  and a bond wire  512 . Semiconductor device  502  includes a plurality of bond pads to which one end of the respective bond wires are adhered to. Package  504  includes a plurality of bond pads to which one end of the respective bond wires are adhered to. 
     For this configuration, bond wire  507  crosses over and above bond wire  508 , whereas bond wire  512  crosses over and above bond wire  510 . 
     The separation between bond wire  507  and bond wire  512  at semiconductor device  502  is 210 microns. The separation between bond wire  508  and bond wire  510  at package  504  is 400 microns. 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  507  and  508  and the pair of bond wires  510  and  512  is calculated as −18.79 dB. 
     The coupling between the bond wires is dependent upon the point of crossing between the bond wires and upon the orientation between the bond wires. A variety of crossing bond wire configurations will be described with reference to  FIGS. 5B-D  below which have a variety of coupling values. 
       FIG. 5B  illustrates a conventional crossed bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package where bond wire orientation is varied as compared to  FIG. 5A . 
     As shown in  FIG. 5B , the separation between the bond wires at semiconductor device  502  and at package  504  is the same as described with reference to  FIG. 5A , however the height of the bond wires is varied slightly. 
     In  FIG. 5B , the inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  507  and  508  and the pair of bond wires  510  and  512  pair is calculated as −17.53 dB. Furthermore, the −17.53 dB coupling is 1.26 dB greater than the configuration described with reference to  FIG. 5A  even though the difference between  FIG. 5A  and  FIG. 5B  is related to the height of the bond wires and not the separation between the bond wires at the bond pads. 
       FIG. 5C  illustrates another example conventional crossed bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package. 
     As shown in  FIG. 5C , the separation between the pair of bond wires  507  and  508  and the pair of bond wires  510  and  512  is increased as compared to  FIGS. 5A-B . The separation between the pair of bond wires  507  and  512  at semiconductor device  502  has been increased to 240 microns. This is a 30 micron increase (14%) in distance of the similar separation of  FIGS. 5A-B . As shown in  FIG. 5C , the separation between bond wire  508  and bond wire  510  at package  504  remains 400 microns. 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  507  and  508  and the pair of bond wires  510  and  512  is calculated as −24.54 dB. The −24.54 dB coupling is 5.75 dB less than  FIG. 5A  and is 7.01 dB less than  FIG. 5B . 
       FIG. 5D  illustrates another example conventional crossed bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package. 
     The separation between bond wire  507  and bond wire  512  at semiconductor device  502  is 240 microns, the same as described with reference to  FIG. 3C . The separation between bond wire  508  and bond wire  510  at package  504  is 400 microns. The 400 microns is an increase of 100 microns over the separation as described with reference to  FIG. 3C . 
     In  FIG. 3C , the larger separation is 500 microns, whereas here the larger separation is 400 microns—meaning a tighter overall bondwire pitch while the isolation has improved from −23 dB to −27 dB. 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  507  and  508  and the pair of bond wires  510  and  512  is calculated as −26.47 dB. The −26.48 dB coupling is 1.93 dB less than  FIG. 5C . 
     What is needed is a system and method for decreasing crosstalk associated with differential pairs and bond wires. 
     BRIEF SUMMARY 
     The present invention provides a system and method for decreasing crosstalk associated with differential pairs and bond wires. 
     The present invention provides a system is provided for use with circuit layout design data including a set of differential pairs and a set of bond wire pairs. A layout portion can receive the circuit layout design data. A crosstalk calculating portion can determine a first amount of crosstalk in a circuit corresponding to the circuit layout design data. A modifier can modify the circuit layout design data into modified circuit layout design data such that one of the set of differential pairs and the set of bond wire pairs includes a crossover. The crosstalk calculating portion can further determine a second amount of crosstalk in a circuit corresponding to the modified circuit layout design data. An optimizer can compare the first amount of crosstalk with the second amount of crosstalk to generate optimized circuit layout design data. A layout designer can output the optimized circuit layout design data. 
     Additional advantages and novel features of the invention arc set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned by practice of the invention. The advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate an exemplary embodiment of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings: 
         FIGS. 1A-C  illustrates an example conventional transmission line system; 
         FIG. 2  illustrates an example conventional transmission line system, wherein one set of signal traces include a crossover; 
         FIGS. 3A-D  illustrate a conventional bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package; 
         FIGS. 4A-C  illustrates a conventional overlapped bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package: 
         FIGS. 5A-D  illustrate a conventional crossed bond wire configuration associated with a semiconductor device and a package; 
         FIGS. 6A-B  illustrate modification of a differential pair circuit in order to reduce cross talk; 
         FIGS. 7A-B  illustrate modification of a plurality of differential pair circuits in order to reduce cross talk; 
         FIG. 8  illustrates an example system for reducing crosstalk associated with a circuit layout, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; 
         FIG. 9  illustrates an example crossed bond wire configuration, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; 
         FIG. 10  is a graph for the example crossed bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9 , in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; 
         FIG. 11  illustrates an example system for reducing crosstalk associated with bond wires, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention: 
         FIG. 12  illustrates an example system for reducing crosstalk associated with bond wires and with differential pairs, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; and 
         FIG. 13  presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method for performing minimization of crosstalk associated with bond wires, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In accordance with aspects of the present invention, a system and method are presented for reducing crosstalk associated with differential pairs and bond wires via crossing of signal traces. 
     Crossovers to reduce crosstalk in differential pairs and bond wires is known. The present invention provides a method to reduce and/or minimize crosstalk on a system basis. Furthermore, the reduction or minimization of crosstalk is performed by analyzing the crosstalk with crossovers located at predetermined points and determining the optimum place to position a crossover or crossovers. Further discussion with respect to reducing and minimizing crosstalk on a system bases is further described with reference to  FIGS. 6-13 . 
       FIGS. 6A-B  illustrate modification of a differential pair circuit in order to reduce cross talk. 
       FIG. 6A  illustrates an example circuit layout configuration  600 . 
     Circuit layout configuration  600  includes a differential pair  601 , a differential pair  602 , and a via  603 . 
     Differential pair  601  includes a signal trace  604  and a signal trace  605 . Differential pair  602  includes a signal trace  606  and a signal trace  607 . 
     Differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  may be located in different layers of an electrical layout. Differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  traverse three sections noted as a section  608 , a section  610  and a section  612 . Section  608  is located between a cross section  614  and a cross section  616 . Section  610  is located between cross section  616  and a cross section  618 . Section  612  is located between cross section  618  and a cross section  620 . Differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  are separated by a distance  622  within section  608 . Differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  are separated by a distance  624  within section  612 . Differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  are separated by distance  622  at cross section  616  with the distance linearly increasing until cross section  618  at which the distance between the differential pairs is distance  624 . The distance associated with distance  622  is smaller than the distance associated with distance  624 . Via  603  is located partially within section  610  and partially within section  612  with a larger portion of via  603  located within section  612 . 
     Differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  provide a transmission medium for transferring an electrical signal. Via  603  provides a mechanism for traversing an electrical conductor from one layer to another layer of a circuit layout. Signal traces  604 ,  605 ,  606  and  607  provide for traversal of respective electrical signals. 
     Using Equation (1) described previously, the amount of cross talk between differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  may be calculated. 
       FIG. 6B  illustrates modifying the conventional circuit as described with reference to  FIG. 6A  in order to reduce cross talk. 
       FIG. 6B  illustrates example circuit layout configuration  600 . 
     As compared to  FIG. 6A , section  608  has been further sectioned into a section  626 , a section  628 , a section  360  and a section  362 . Section  626  is located between cross section  614  and cross section  616 . Section  628  is located between cross section  616  and a cross section  634 . Section  360  is located between cross section  634  and a cross section  636 . Section  632  is located between cross section  636  and a cross section  638 . 
     Cross talk can be reduced between differential pair  601  and  602  by crossing the signal traces associated with the differential pairs. For example, crossing signal trace  606  and signal trace  607  at a point  640  may reduce cross talk by a first amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  604  and  605  at a point  642  may reduce cross talk a second amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  604  and  605  at a point  644  may reduce cross talk a third amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  606  and  607  at a point  646  may reduce cross talk a fourth amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  604  and  605  at cross section  636  may reduce cross talk a fifth amount. For this example, cross talk may be reduced the most of the five examples at cross section  636  where signal traces  604  and  605  initiate switching at cross section  634 , crossover at cross section  636  and complete the switch over at cross section  638 . 
     For the sake of discussion, the cross talk between differential pair  601  and differential pair  602  has been reduced the most of the five potential cross over positions due to the crossing of the differential pairs at cross section  636 . The location and architecture for the crossing of the differential pairs is selected from a plurality of potential crossing points and architectures and the selected crossing point and architecture represents the lowest cross talk from the group of potential crossing points and architectures. 
     In some embodiments, the aggregate cross talk between the differential pairs may be reduced by performing a plurality of crossovers, for example at point  640  and  642 . 
       FIG. 6B  illustrates example circuit layout configuration where a crossing point and an architecture are selected from a plurality of potential crossing points and architectures in order to select the lowest cross talk. 
       FIGS. 7A-B  illustrate modification of a plurality of differential pair circuits in order to reduce cross talk. 
       FIG. 7A  illustrates an example circuit layout configuration  700 . 
     Circuit layout configuration  700  includes a differential pair  701 , a differential pair  702 , a differential pair  703  a via  710  and a via  711 . 
     Differential pair  701  includes a signal trace  704  and a signal trace  705 . Differential pair  702  includes a signal trace  706  and a signal trace  707 . Differential pair  703  includes a signal trace  708  and a signal trace  709 . 
     Differential pair  701 , differential pair  702  and differential pair  703  may be located in different layers of an electrical layout. 
     Differential pairs  701 ,  702  and  703  traverse seven sections noted as a section  712 , a section  714 , a section  716 , a section  718 , a section  720 , a section  722  and a section  724 . Section  712  is located between a cross section  726  and a cross section  728 . Section  714  is located between cross section  728  and a cross section  730 . Section  716  is located between cross section  730  and a cross section  732 . Section  718  is located between cross section  732  and a cross section  734 . Section  720  is located between cross section  734  and a cross section  736 . Section  722  is located between cross section  736  and a cross section  738 . Section  724  is located between cross section  738  and a cross section  740 . Differential pair  701  and differential pair  702  are separated by a distance  742  within sections  712 ,  714 ,  716 ,  718  and  720 . Differential pair  701  and differential pair  702  are separated by a distance  744  within section  724 . Within section  722 , the distance between differential pair  701  and differential pair  702  increases linearly from distance  742  to distance  744  as the pairs traverse from cross section  736  to cross section  738 . Differential pair  702  and differential pair  703  are separated by a distance  746  within sections  712 ,  720 ,  722  and  724 . Differential pair  702  and differential pair  703  are separated by a distance  748  within section  716 . Within section  714 , the distance between differential pair  702  and differential pair  703  decreases linearly from distance  746  to distance  748  as differential pairs  702  and  703  traverse from cross section  728  to cross section  730 . Within section  718 , the distance between differential pair  702  and differential pair  703  increases linearly from distance  748  to distance  746  as differential pairs  702  and  703  traverse from cross section  732  to cross section  734 . The distance associated with distance  742  is smaller than the distance associated with distance  746 . The distance associated with distance  746  is smaller than the distance associated with distance  744 . Via  711  is located partially within sections  714 ,  716  and  718 . Via  710  is located partially in section  722  and section  724  with a larger portion located within section  724 . 
     Differential pairs  701 ,  702  and  703  provide transmission mediums for transferring respective electrical signals. 
     Signal traces  704 ,  705 ,  706 ,  707 ,  708  and  709  provide for traversal of respective electrical signals. 
     Using Equation (1) described previously, the amount of cross talk between differential pair  701  and differential pair  702  may be calculated. Furthermore, using Equation (1), the amount of cross talk between differential pair  702  and  703  may be calculated and the cross talk between differential pair  701  and  703  may be calculated. 
       FIG. 7A  illustrates an example circuit layout configuration where the cross talk between a plurality of differential pairs may be determined. 
       FIG. 7B  illustrates modifying the circuit as described with reference to  FIG. 7A  in order to reduce cross talk. 
       FIG. 7B  illustrates example circuit layout configuration  700 . 
     As compared to  FIG. 7A , section  718  has been further sectioned into a section  750  and a section  752 . Section  750  is located between cross section  732  and a cross section  754 . Section  752  is located between cross section  754  and cross section  734 . 
     Cross talk can be reduced between differential pair  701 ,  702  and  703  by crossing the signal traces associated with the differential pairs. For example, crossing signal trace  704  and signal trace  705  at a point  756  may reduce cross talk a first amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  706  and  707  at a point  758  may reduce cross talk a second amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  708  and  709  at a point  760  may reduce cross talk a third amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  704  and  705  at a point  762  may reduce cross talk a fourth amount. Furthermore, crossing signal trace  706  and  707  at cross section  754  may reduce cross talk a fifth amount. For this example, cross talk may be reduced the most of the five examples at cross section  754  where signal traces  706  and  707  initiate switching at cross section  732 , crossover at cross section  754  and complete the switch over at cross section  734 . 
     The aggregate cross talk between differential pair  701 ,  702  and  703  has been reduced due to the crossing of the differential pairs at cross section  754 . The location and architecture for the crossing of the differential pairs is selected from a plurality of potential crossing points and architectures and the selected crossing point and architecture represents the lowest cross talk from the group of potential crossing points and architectures. 
     In some embodiments, the aggregate cross talk between the differential pairs may be reduced by performing a plurality of crossovers, for example at point  756  and  758 . 
       FIG. 7B  illustrates example circuit layout configuration where a crossing point and an architecture are selected from a plurality of potential crossing points and architectures in order to select the lowest cross talk associated with a plurality of differential pairs. 
       FIG. 8  illustrates a system for implementing the cross talk modification for differential pairs as described with reference to  FIGS. 6A-7B . 
       FIG. 8  illustrates an example system  800  for reducing crosstalk associated with a circuit layout, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. 
     System  800  includes a differential pair layout portion  802 , a selector portion  804 , an integrator portion  806 , a memory portion  808 , an optimizer portion  810 , a layout designer portion  812  and a modifier portion  814 . Memory portion  808  includes a cross-over placement portion  815  and a cross talk portion  816 . 
     Selector portion  804  receives information from differential pair layout portion  802  via a communication channel  817  and from integrator portion  806  via a communication channel  818 . Integrator portion  806  receives information from selector portion  804  via a communication channel  820 . Memory portion  808  communicates bi-directionally with integrator portion  806  via a communication channel  822  and with optimizer portion  810  via a communication channel  824 . Layout designer portion  812  receives information from optimizer portion  810  via a communication channel  826  and from differential pair layout portion  802  via a communication channel  828 . Modifier portion  814  receives information from integrator portion  806  via a communication channel  830 . Differential pair layout portion  802  receives information from modifier portion  814  via a communication channel  832 . Layout designer portion  812  communicates information to external entities via a communication channel  834 . 
     Differential pair layout portion  802  provides information associated with a plurality of potential differential pair configurations from which to select. Selector portion  804  selects a differential pair configuration for application. Integrator portion  806  integrates between differential pairs in order to determine the crosstalk between the differential pairs. Memory portion  808  receives, retrieves and stores information. Optimizer portion  810  performs optimization associated with reducing cross talk. Layout designer portion  812  performs circuit layouts. Modifier portion  814  modifies differential pair layouts. Cross-over placement portion  815  receives, retrieves and stores information associated with cross-over placement. Cross talk portion  816  stores information associated with cross talk. 
     In operation, differential pair layout portion  802  contains a plurality of potential layout scenarios for differential pairs. Selector portion  804  selects a scenario for laying out differential pairs. Scenario may include crossing over differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 6B  and  FIG. 78 . Integrator portion  806  calculates Equation (1) in order to determine the amount of crosstalk between differential pairs. Integrator portion  806  stores information into memory portion  808  including layout information and cross-over placements stored in cross-over placement portion  815  and associated cross talk information stored into cross talk portion  816 . Modifier portion  814  receives placement information and cross talk information from integrator portion  806  and may add or remove layout scenarios from differential pair layout portion  802 . 
     The process is repeated for available layout scenarios with associated information stored in memory portion  808 , cross-over placement portion  815  and cross talk portion  816 . Following the performance of the cross talk calculation for potential layout scenarios, optimizer portion  810  determines the scenario with the smallest amount of cross talk and communicates the information to layout designer portion  812 . Layout designer portion  812  performs detailed layout of circuit based upon the selected scenario. 
     Issues with crosstalk may additionally be reduced via configuration of crossed bond wires as will be discussed with reference to  FIG. 9 . 
       FIG. 9  illustrates an example crossed bond wire configuration  900 , in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. 
     Crossed bond wire configuration  900  includes a semiconductor device  902 , a package  904 , a differential pair  905  and a differential pair  906 . Differential pair  905  includes a bond wire  907  and a bond wire  908 . Differential pair  906  includes a bond wire  910  and a bond wire  912 . Semiconductor device  902  includes a plurality of bond pads to which one end of the respective bond wires are adhered to. Package  904  includes a plurality of bond pads to which one end of the respective bond wires are adhered to. 
     Semiconductor device  902  provides electrical circuitry for electrical operations. Non-limiting examples for semiconductor device  902  include microprocessor and memory. Package  904  provides carriage and protection for semiconductor device  902 . Differential pair  905  provides a transmission medium for transferring an electrical signal. Differential pair  906  provides a transmission medium for transferring an electrical signal. 
     For this configuration, bond wire  907  crosses over and above bond wire  908  and bond wire  912  crosses over and above bond wire  910 . 
     Semiconductor device  902  provides electrical circuitry for electrical operations. Non-limiting examples for semiconductor device  902  include microprocessor and memory. Package  904  provides carriage and protection for semiconductor device  902 . Bond wires  907 ,  908 ,  910  and  912  provide connection between bond pads located on semiconductor device  902  and package  904 . 
     Bond wires  907 ,  908 ,  910  and  912  are oriented with respect to an x-axis  930  with units of microns, with respect to a y-axis  932  with units of microns and with respect to a z-axis  934  with units of microns. 
     A table  938  contains location information for bond wires  907 ,  908 ,  910  and  912 . 
     A table portion  940  provides location information associated with bond wire  907 . A table portion  942  provides location information associated with bond wire  908 . A table portion  944  provides location information associated with bond wire  910 . A table portion  946  provides location information associated with bond wire  912 . 
     Bond wire  907  initiates at a (x,y,z) location with coordinates of (−220,0,175), then traverses to location (−220,0,225), then traverses to (−200,700,25) and then terminates at (−200,700,0). 
     Bond wire  908  initiates at a (x,y,z) location with coordinates of (−150,0,175), then traverses to location (−150,0,250), then traverses to (−300,600,125) and then terminates at (−300,600,0). 
     Bond wire  910  initiates at a (x,y,z) location with coordinates of (200,0,175), then traverses to location (220,0,225), then traverses to (200,700,25) and then terminates at (200,700,0). 
     Bond wire  912  initiates at a (x,y,z) location with coordinates of (150,0,175), then traverses to location (150,0,250), then traverses to (300,600,125) and then terminates at (300,600,0). 
     The separation between bond wire  907  and bond wire  912  at semiconductor device  902  is 370 microns. The separation between bond wire  908  and bond wire  910  at package  904  is 500 microns. 
     The inductive coupling between the pair of bond wires  907  and  908  pair and the pair of bond wires  910  and  912  pair is calculated as −67.96 dB. 
     Accordingly, the bond wire arrangement of  FIG. 9 , having an inductive coupling calculated as −67.96 dB for the bond wire arrangement of  FIG. 9  is much smaller than the inductive coupling calculated as −26.47 dB for the bond wire arrangement of  FIG. 5 . 
       FIG. 10  is a graph for the example crossed bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9 , in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. 
     As shown in  FIG. 10 , graph  1000  has an x-axis  1002  corresponding to the position of a first wire alone first axis, a y-axis  1004  corresponding to the position of a second wire and a z-axis  1006  corresponding to the coupling between the two wires (in −dB) which is to be maximized. The graph indicates that for varying wire junction locations, the coupling between the wires can be optimized by varying a simple set of parameters. This graph shows only two parameters (perhaps two of the wire vertices), but this can be generalized to as many vertices as are necessary and practical for the wire bonding equipment available. 
       FIG. 11  illustrates an example system  1100  for reducing crosstalk associated with bond wires, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. 
     System  1100  includes a bond wire pair layout portion  1102 , selector portion  804 , integrator portion  806 , memory portion  808 , optimizer portion  810 , layout designer portion  812  and modifier portion  814 . Memory portion  808  includes cross-over placement portion  815  and cross talk portion  816 . 
     Selector portion  804  receives information from bond wire pair layout portion  1102  via communication channel  817  and from integrator portion  806  via communication channel  818 . Integrator portion  806  receives information from selector portion  804  via communication channel  820 . Memory portion  808  communicates bi-directionally with integrator portion  806  via communication channel  822  and with optimizer portion  810  via communication channel  824 . Layout designer portion  812  receives information from optimizer portion  810  via communication channel  826  and from bond wire pair layout portion  1102  via communication channel  828 . Modifier portion  814  receives information from integrator portion  806  via communication channel  830 . Bond wire pair layout portion  1102  receives information from modifier portion  814  via communication channel  832 . Layout designer portion  812  communicates information to external entities via communication channel  834 . 
     Bond wire pair layout portion  1102  provides information associated with a plurality of potential bond wire pair configurations from which to select. Selector portion  804  selects a bond wire pair configuration for application. Integrator portion  806  performs an integration between bond wires in order to determine the crosstalk between the bond wires. Memory portion  808  receives, retrieves and stores information. Optimizer portion  810  performs optimization associated with reducing bond wire cross talk. Layout designer portion  812  performs bond wire layouts. Modifier portion  814  modifies bond wire pair layouts. Cross-over placement portion  815  receives, retrieves and stores information associated with bond wire cross-over placement. Cross talk portion  816  stores information associated with cross talk. 
     In operation, bond wire pair layout portion  1102  contains a plurality of potential layout scenarios for bond wires. Selector portion  804  selects a scenario for laying out the bond wire. Scenario may include crossing bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . Integrator portion  806  calculates Equation (1) in order to determine the amount of crosstalk between bond wires. Integrator portion  806  stores information into memory portion  808  including layout information and cross-over placements stored in cross-over placement portion  815  and associated cross talk information stored into cross talk portion  816 . Modifier portion  814  receives placement information and cross talk information from integrator portion  806  and may add or remove bond wire layout scenarios from bond wire pair layout portion  1102 . The previous process is repeated for available bond wire layout scenarios with associated information stored in memory portion  808 , cross-over placement portion  815  and cross talk portion  816 . Following the performance of the cross talk calculation for potential bond wire layout scenarios, optimizer portion  810  determines the scenario with the smallest amount of cross talk and communicates the information to layout designer portion  812 . Layout designer portion  812  performs detailed layout of bond wires based upon the selected scenario. 
     System  800  of  FIG. 8  establishes crossover placement of differential pairs to minimize crosstalk associated with a circuit layout, whereas system  1100  of  FIG. 11  establishes crossover placement in bond wires to minimize crosstalk associated with a circuit layout. Both aspects may be combined in a single system. This will now be described in greater detail with reference to  FIG. 12 . 
       FIG. 12  illustrates an example system  1200  for reducing crosstalk associated with bond wires and with differential pairs, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. 
     System  1200  includes a circuit layout portion  1202 , selector portion  804 , integrator portion  806 , memory portion  808 , optimizer portion  810 , layout designer portion  812  and modifier portion  814 . 
     Selector portion  804  receives information from circuit layout portion  1202  via communication channel  817  and from integrator portion  806  via communication channel  818 . Layout designer portion  812  receives information from optimizer portion  810  via communication channel  826  and from circuit layout portion  1202  via communication channel  828 . Circuit layout portion  1202  receives information from modifier portion  814  via communication channel  832 . 
     Circuit layout portion  1202  provides information associated with a plurality of potential bond wire pair and differential configurations from which to select. Selector portion  804  selects bond wire and differential pair configurations for application. Integrator portion  806  integrates between bond wires in order to determine the crosstalk between the bond wires. Furthermore, integrator portion  806  integrates between differential pairs in order to determine the crosstalk between the differential pairs. Memory portion  808  receives, retrieves and stores information. Optimizer portion  810  performs optimization associated with reducing bond wire and differential pair cross talk. Layout designer portion  812  performs bond wire and differential pair layouts. Modifier portion  814  modifies bond wire and differential pair layouts. Cross-over placement portion  815  receives, retrieves and stores information associated with bond wire and differential pair cross-over placement. Cross talk portion  816  stores information associated with cross talk. 
     In operation, circuit layout portion  1202  contains a plurality of potential layout scenarios for bond wires and differential pairs. Selector portion  804  selects a scenario for laying out the bond wires and differential pairs. Scenario may include crossing bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 9  and crossing differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 6B  and  FIG. 7B . Integrator portion  806  calculates Equation (1) in order to determine the amount of crosstalk between bond wires. Furthermore, integrator portion  806  calculates of Equation (1) in order to determine the amount of crosstalk between differential pairs. Integrator portion  806  stores information into memory portion  808  including layout information and cross-over placements stored in cross-over placement portion  815  and associated cross talk information stored into cross talk portion  816 . Modifier portion  814  receives placement information and cross talk information from integrator portion  806  and may add or remove bond wire and/or differential pair layout scenarios from circuit layout portion  1202 . The previous process is repeated for available bond wire and differential a priori layout scenarios with associated information stored in memory portion  808 , cross-over placement portion  815  and cross talk portion  816 . Following the performance of the cross talk calculation for potential bond wire and differential pair layout scenarios, optimizer portion  810  determines the scenario with the smallest amount of cross talk and communicates the information to layout designer portion  812 . Layout designer portion  812  performs detailed layout of bond wires and differential pairs based upon the selected scenario. 
       FIG. 13  presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method  1300  for performing minimization of crosstalk associated with bond wires, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. 
     As shown in the figure, in an example embodiment, method  1300  starts (S 1302 ) and a determination is performed for potential crossover positions (S 1304 ). 
     For performing crosstalk minimization for circuit differential pairs as described with reference to  FIGS. 6A-7B , differential pair layout portion  802  ( FIG. 8 ) determines a plurality of potential layout scenarios for differential pairs. For performing crosstalk minimization for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 9 , bond wire pair layout portion  1102  ( FIG. 11 ) determines a plurality of potential layout scenarios for bond wires. For performing crosstalk minimization for differential pairs as described with reference to  FIGS. 6A-7B  and for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 9 , circuit layout portion  1202  ( FIG. 12 ) determines a plurality of potential layout scenarios for bond wires and differential pairs. 
     For example, with reference to  FIG. 7B , potential differential pair crossover points may be located at cross section  754 , point  756 , point  758 , point  760  and point  762 . As such, in this example, the number of potential crossover configurations may be calculated as 2 5 . As another example, potential bond wire configurations may be as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . As another example, with additional reference to  FIG. 7B , potential differential pair and bond wire configurations may be the combination of cross section  754 , point  756 , point  758 , point  760  and point  762  as described with reference to  FIG. 78  and the bond wire configurations as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , then a potential differential pair crossover configuration as described with reference to  FIGS. 6A-7B  is selected for analysis (S 1306 ). 
     Selector portion  804  selects a scenario for configuring differential pair crossovers. 
     For example, for performing crosstalk calculation for differential pairs, a crossover configuration is selected from the set of potential differential pair crossover configurations. 
     Furthermore, with reference to  FIG. 78 , the differential pair configuration of no crossing at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  may be selected. 
     As another example, for performing crosstalk calculation for bond wires, a crossover configuration is selected from the set of potential bond wire crossover configurations. Furthermore, the bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9  may be selected. 
     As another example, for performing crosstalk calculation for differential pairs and bond wires, a crossover configuration is selected from the set of potential differential pair and bond wire configurations. Furthermore, the differential pair configuration of no crossing at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  and the bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9  may be selected. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , then an aggregate crossover calculation is performed on a system basis (S 1308 ). 
     For differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 8 , for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 11  or for differential pairs and bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 12 , integrator portion  806  calculates Equation (I) in order to determine the amount of crosstalk between bond wires and/or differential pairs. Furthermore, integrator portion  806  calculates Equation (1) in order to determine the amount of crosstalk between bond wires and/or differential pairs. Integrator portion  806  stores information into memory portion  808  including layout information and cross-over placements stored in cross-over placement portion  815  and associated cross talk information stored into cross talk portion  816 . 
     For example, a crossover calculation may be performed for no crossing at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 78 . 
     As another example, a crossover calculation may be performed for the bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . 
     As another example, a crossover calculation may be performed for no crossing at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 78  and for the bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , then a determination is performed for completing the analysis for the total set of potential configurations (S 1310 ). 
     For differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 8 , for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 11  or for differential pairs and bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 12 , system  800 , system  1100  or system  1200 , respectively, determines if any further configurations are available in cross-over placement portion  815  for performing crossover analysis. 
     For example, for differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 8  a determination is performed as to whether all of the differential pair configurations for points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  have been selected for crosstalk analysis. 
     As another example, for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 11  a determination is performed as to whether all of the bond wire configurations as described with reference to  FIG. 9  have been selected for crosstalk analysis. 
     As another example, for differential pairs and bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 12  a determination is performed as to whether all of the differential pair configurations for points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  and all of the potential bond wires configurations as described with reference to  FIG. 9  have been selected for crosstalk analysis. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , for a determination of not completing the analysis for the total set of potential configurations (S 1310 ), then configurations are added to set of configurations as needed (S 1311 ) followed by execution of method  1300  transitioning to configuring another scenario of crossover positions (S 1306 ). 
     For differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 8 , for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 11  or for differential pairs and bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 12 , system  800 , system  1100  or system  1200 , respectively, modifier portion  814  receives placement information and cross talk information from integrator portion  806  and may add or remove layout scenarios from differential pair layout portion  802 . 
     For example, for differential pairs a new crossover location may be added to differential pair  701  in section  722  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B . 
     As another example, for bond wires a new bond wire crossover configuration may be added as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . 
     For example, for differential pairs and bond wires a new crossover location may be added to differential pair  701  in section  722  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  and a new bond wire crossover configuration may be added as described with reference to  FIG. 9 . 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , for a determination of completing the analysis for the total set of potential configurations (S 1310 ), then a determination is performed for the configurations with the minimum crosstalk (S 1312 ). 
     For differential pairs as described with reference to  FIG. 8 , for bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 11  or for differential pairs and bond wires as described with reference to  FIG. 12 , system  800 , system  1100  or system  1200 , respectively, optimizer portion  810  determines the scenario with the smallest amount of cross talk and communicates the information to layout designer portion  812 . 
     For example, for differential pairs with no crossing at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  may be determined as the configuration with the minimum crosstalk. 
     As another example, for bond wires the configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9  may be determined as the configuration with the minimum crosstalk. 
     As another example, for differential pairs and bond wires with no crossing for differential pairs at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  and the bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9  may be determined as the configuration with the minimum crosstalk. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , then a layout of the system is performed based upon the minimum crosstalk configuration (S 1314 ). 
     Layout designer portion  812  performs detailed layout of circuit based upon the selected scenario. 
     For example, for the differential pair configuration with no crossing at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  may be laid out for the system. 
     As another example, the bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9  may be laid out for the system. 
     As another example, for differential pairs and bond wires configuration with no crossing for differential pairs at points  756 ,  758 ,  760 ,  762  and crossing at cross section  754  as described with reference to  FIG. 7B  and bond wire configuration as described with reference to  FIG. 9  may be laid out for the system. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 13 , then execution of method  1300  terminates (S 1316 ). 
       FIG. 13  presents a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method for performing minimization of crosstalk associated with bond wires where a minimum configuration is determined from a set of configurations, and the system is configured with the minimum configurations. 
     A bond wire cross over optimization system has been described which performs optimization for reducing cross talk. A bond wire configuration has been described which enables the use of bond wire packaging for high speed electronic devices which could not be used with conventional technology due to space and coupling limitations. Furthermore, the bond wire configuration reduces the coupling between imbalanced differential pairs via a bond wire crossover which results in a near zero coupling between bond wire differential pairs. Furthermore, the bond wire configuration may be easily implemented using standard manufacturing technology. Furthermore, the bond wire configuration yields and inexpensive package for high performance systems. Furthermore, the bond wire configuration may be observed using x-ray. A differential pair cross over optimization system has been described which performs optimization for reducing cross talk. A combined bond wire and differential cross over optimization system has been described which performs optimization for reducing cross talk 
     The foregoing description of various preferred embodiments of the invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The example embodiments, as described above, were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.