Abstract:
The invention relates to a DC-DC converter adapted to supply a MEMS device comprising an input for receiving a DC voltage (Vs), an output for transmitting a supplied voltage (V 1 ) to the MEMS device. The DC-DC converter further comprises a biasing circuit (MNBC) for biasing a first node (Vmi) and a second node (Vme) with a first biasing voltage (Vm 1 ) and a second biasing voltage (Vm 2 ).

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
       [0001]    The invention relates to a DC-DC converter and more specifically to a DC-DC converter adapted to work with a micro-electromechanical system or MEMS device. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    MEMS devices are more and more used in microelectronics, the market of these devices continually increasing every year. As an example of a MEMS device we shall use, for the purpose of this application a MEMS microphone. The MEMS microphone market is approximately doubling every year. 
         [0003]      FIG. 1  depicts a typical DC-DC converter adapted to supply a MEMS microphone and in general to a MEMS device, which is denoted MEMS in  FIG. 1 . The converter receives an input direct current (DC) voltage Vs and converts it into two higher level DC voltages V 1  and V 2 . The voltage V 1  is transmitted to the MEMS device via the pairs of diodes D 1 ,D 2 . The V 2  is transmitted to the middle node of two capacitors in series via diodes D 3 ,D 4 . The diodes are connected in the well-known back to front connection or anti-parallel. Sw 1  switch which intermittently connect the said voltage to the MEMS device. Sw 2  switch which intermittently connect the said voltage to the middle node of two capacitors in serives. In parallel with the MEMS device there is a series connection of two equal-value capacitors C 1  and C 2 . The capacitors determine a mid-point voltage Vme and further smooth the voltages V 1  and V 2 . 
         [0004]    There are some issues related to this DC-DC converter and we shall outline them assuming that the output voltage of the converter is 10.77 volt and the MEMS device is a MEMS microphone. 
         [0005]    Problem 1. The 10.7V DC-DC converter needs also a load capacitor of 45 pF for MEMS Microphone. So, C 1 =C 2 =90 pF are used. The voltage at the middle node between two series capacitors should be maintained between maximum of 5.5V and minimum 5.3V (which is about half of the output voltage of 10.7V). If this middle node voltage (MNV) goes above 5.5V (e.g. 6V) then the capacitor C 2  can be damaged and 10.7V DC-DC converter becomes useless. 
         [0006]    Problem 2. During startup the middle node voltage may go beyond 5.5V. Again this will damage the capacitor C 2  and the 10.77V DC-DC converter will not work properly anymore. This is a newly identified problem, which was not previously reported. 
         [0007]    Problem 3. The ripple at output voltage V 1 =10.77V does not meet specifications of below 10 uV. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0008]    Hence, it is a need, of a DC-DC converter for a MEMS device which overcomes part or all of the above-mentioned problems. 
         [0009]    It is therefore an object of the invention to provide A DC-DC converter adapted to supply a MEMS device comprising: 
         [0010]    an input for receiving a DC voltage; 
         [0011]    an output for transmitting a supplied voltage to the MEMS device; the DC-DC converter further comprising a biasing circuit for biasing a first node and a second node with a first biasing voltage and a second biasing voltage. This has the advantage that the value of the voltage at the first and the second node is maintained at almost half of the supply voltage. 
         [0012]    In an embodiment of the invention, the DC-DC further comprises a first set of level shifters serially coupled between the input and a supply terminal receiving a supply voltage, the first set of level shifters determining a partition of the supply voltage into equally spaced voltage levels, the first biasing voltage and the second biasing voltage being a subset of two of the equally spaced voltage levels. Using this arrangement one should not use calibrated resistors for creating the necessary voltages for the said nodes. Furthermore, the resistors should have a very high value that would determine a consumption of a large portion of the circuit layout. 
         [0013]    In another embodiment of the invention, the DC-DC converter further comprises a first switch circuit and a second switch circuit, the first switch circuit being coupled to a sixth voltage level generated by the first set of the level shifters, the second switch circuit being coupled the first biasing voltage and the second biasing voltage. With this arrangement it is no need for a calibrated voltage level in the circuit. 
         [0014]    In yet another embodiment of the invention, the DC-DC converter further comprises a second set of level shifters coupled to the first set of level shifters, the second set of level shifters generating a first control signal and a second control signal, the first control signal controlling the first switch circuit and the second control signal controlling the second switch circuit. 
         [0015]    In this way there is a correlation between the level shifters which determines the voltage levels of the nodes and the voltage control of the switches. 
         [0016]    In another embodiment of the invention, the second set of level shifters of the DC-DC converter comprise a first level shifter being supplied by one of the equally spaced voltage levels, and a second level shifter being supplied by a second one of the equally spaced voltage levels. 
         [0017]    In another embodiment of the invention the equally spaced voltages are indexed from 1 to 7, wherein a first voltage equals the equally space voltage and any higher level voltage equals the preceding voltage level plus the equally spaced voltage and wherein the first biasing voltage and the second biasing voltage are obtained using a first pair of transistors and a second pair of transistors, each pair of transistors being controlled by two consecutive equally spaced voltages, said pairs of transistors being connected in series between a next consecutive level of the two consecutive equally spaced voltages and a reference terminal. 
         [0018]    In another embodiment of the invention the each of the first node and the second node is coupled to a reference terminal via a filter. That will determine a further filtering of the signals, contributing to reducing the parasitic high frequency components of the signals. 
         [0019]    Furthermore, each switch comprises substrate selection MOS transistors. 
         [0020]    The invention is defined by the independent claims. Dependent claims define advantageous embodiments. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0021]    The above and other advantages will be apparent from the exemplary description of the accompanying drawings in which 
           [0022]      FIG. 1  depicts a typical DC-DC converter driving a MEMS device; 
           [0023]      FIG. 2  depicts a first embodiment of the invention; 
           [0024]      FIG. 3  depicts a more detailed view of the DC-DC converter, according to the invention; 
           [0025]      FIG. 4  depicts a more detailed view of the first level shifter, according to the invention; 
           [0026]      FIG. 5  depicts a more detailed view of the nodes voltages generation, according to the invention; 
           [0027]      FIG. 6  depicts a resistor based voltage generation of the nodes voltages; 
           [0028]      FIG. 7  depicts a more detailed view of the second level shifter circuit; 
           [0029]      FIG. 8   a  depicts a substrate selection n-MOS transistor; 
           [0030]      FIG. 8   b  depicts a substrate selection p-MOS transistor; and 
           [0031]      FIG. 9  depicts a typical connection of a MEMS device to the DC-DC converter and to an external signal source. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS 
       [0032]    The new DC-DC Converter architecture consists of a set of circuits described in the  FIGS. 2 ,  3  and  4 . 
         [0033]    In  FIG. 4  it is shown a Switch Capacitor Charge Pump (SCCP). It generates an output voltage of 10.77V from input voltage of 1.65V. It has seven gain levels. When input voltage (at node Vs) is 1.65V, the voltage at each gain level equals=1.65+(1.52V*Gain level number). Gain Level number is an integer number between 1 and 6. The 10.77V voltage is outputted at level  6 . After the diodes of  FIGS. 2 and 3 , the output voltage at node ‘output  2 ’ in  FIGS. 2 and 3  can be a few mV lower then voltage at node ‘level  6 ’. Voltage drop across diodes is proportionally to the leakage current in the MEMS microphone. It has an additional 7 th  level for providing 12.2V to level Shifter  1 . 
         [0034]    The architecture further comprises a Middle Node Biasing Circuit (MNBC) as it is shown in  FIGS. 3 and 5 . The MNBC generates nodes voltages of about 5.4V when output voltage is 10.7V. This was made because there was no stable voltage node on the Switch Capacitor Charge Pump (SCCP) that could be used to generate 5.4V. 
         [0035]    There were also two voltage levels at the output nodes Vm 1  and Vm 2  needed to bias the middle node of two sets of two capacitors in series. The external two series capacitors are 90 pF each. The internal two series capacitors are of 9 pF each. This circuit is also suitable for keeping the voltage level of 5.4V stable also when a very large current is drawn from the Middle node biasing circuit. 
         [0036]    There are two Level Shifter Circuits (LS) which are shown in  FIGS. 4 and 8 , respectively. They are used to open and close the switches across the anti-parallel diodes. Closing the switches decreases the start up time to reach 10.7V at the output of the DC-DC converter. Two level shifter circuits are needed so that one switch opens slightly later then the other. Level shifter  2 , as shown in  FIG. 8 , opens the switch Sw 2  across the diodes about 10 u seconds after level shifter  1 , shown in  FIG. 3 , opens switch Sw 1 . In the level shifters, regenerative feedback circuit response time is slow, as shown in  FIG. 7 . The regenerative feedback circuit response is two PMOS transistos connected level  7  for level shifter  1  in  FIG. 7 . The regenerative feedback circuit response is two PMOS transistos connected level for level shifter  2 . The response time is made slow by having very long channel length transistors in the regenerative feedback circuits. This is because less current is then needed and a charge pump (SCCP) that provides less current is needed. Hence, the result is a reduction of the chip area of charge pump (SCCP). In  FIGS. 3 and 7 , level shifter  1  converts 1.8V, received at the input node LS 1 in, to 12.2V, at node LS 1 out and converts 0V, at input node LS 1 in, to 7.85V at node LS 1 out. Level shifter  2  converts 1.8V from the input node LS 2  in to 7.85V, at node LS 2 out and converts 0V to 3.2V at node LS 2 out. 
         [0037]    When the switch Sw 2  ( FIG. 1 ) is closed it makes a low impedance short circuit to middle node Vme i.e. the node between the series capacitors from output node Vm 2  of the Middle node biasing circuit (MNBC). The switch is across the anti-parallel diodes, forcing the voltage at node Vme to be 5.4V. The switches Sw 1  and Sw 2  are only opened after the output voltage of DC-DC converter is settled to about 10.77V. By closing the switch prevents the voltage across capacitor C 2  of  FIG. 1  to go over 5.5V. If the switch Sw 2  is not closed during start up then, voltage across capacitor C 2  goes above 5.5. V because the voltage of the middle node, Vme rises faster then the voltage at the output node i.e. node output  1 . In sequence, the middle node Vme of the two series capacitors rises first to 5.4V. Then after some time voltage at the output i.e. the node output  1 , top plate of capacitor C 1  rises to 10.77, and this voltage adds extra voltage across capacitor C 2  because of the series capacitors form a capacitor voltage divider. 
         [0038]    In order to reduce the ripple of the output voltage there are provided low-pass filters, as it is shown in  FIG. 2 . A first second order filter is provided at the output of the switch capacitor charge pump (SCCP). This filter is connected between the node ‘level  6 ’ to the node ‘output  1 ’. There is also another second order filter between the output of one of middle node biasing circuit and external middle node. This filter is connected between the node Vm 2  to the node Vme. The other middle node biasing circuit has a first order filter at its output. The output of the filter is connected to internal middle node between capacitors C 4  and C 3  in  FIG. 2 . The filter is connected between the node Vm 1  and the node Vmi. 
         [0039]    In order to further reduce the ripple of the output voltage, at the output of charge pump, Small Output Resistors (SMOR) e.g. R 2  and R 3  in  FIG. 2 , are added to reduce ripple on 10.7V. R 2  in series with C 1  and C 2  form a filter to reduce the ripple that feeds through the parasitic capacitors across anti-parallel diodes. The resistor R 3  is connected in series with microphone capacitance, thus forming for filtering out the ripple that feed through the External middle node, Vme, to node ‘output  1 ’. 
         [0040]    Hence, combing all the above-described filters determines a reduction of the ripple of the output voltage to e.g. 3 uV. 
         [0041]    In  FIG. 4 , between two levels there are two PMOS Transistors connected together as they would be in regenerative feedback network. Also two NMOS transistors connected together as they would be in regenerative feedback network. It is further observed that the devices having the same label on their terminals are connected together. Also for this design, a preferred input clock frequency of 2.4 MHz is used into the node Clkin. However other clock frequencies can be used. 
         [0042]    There are two ‘middle node biasing circuits’ shown in  FIG. 5 . Both Middle node Biasing Circuits are made of NMOS and PMOS transistors connected in source follower topology. The output of first transistor is node Vm 1  and the output of second transistor is node Vm 2 . 
         [0043]    The gate of the PMOS transistor is connected to level  2 . its source is connected to middle nodes Vm 1  or Vm 2 , which each is 5.4V voltage node. Its drain connected to level  1 . The gate of the NMOS transistor is connected to level  3 , its source is connected to the middle node Vm 1  or Vm 2  and its drain is connected to level  4 . These provide a good performance voltage source because the impedance is very small at middle node Vm 1  or Vm 2 . Its input impedance is about 1/(gmp+gmn), where gmp and gmn are the trans-conductance of the PMOS and NMOS transistor, respectively. 
         [0044]    The solutions presented, so far, have several advantages over previous solution as: 
         [0045]    There is an advantage for middle node biasing circuit when compared with the alternative solution consisting in providing a resistor ladder between level  6  and ground as it is shown in  FIG. 6 . For the circuit shown in  FIG. 6 , very large resistors are needed for having a low current through them. However, large resistor layout is provided, in this case, with long length and narrow width. Narrow width causes mismatch and so getting the precise 5.4V more difficult. Also long length means large chip area. It was calculated if resistance was 100 MOhms the area would be 3 times more then the solution according to this invention. The layout of 1 MOhms resistors having near minimum width of 0.4 um will have a length of 100 um. Also a hundred of these 1 MOhms resistors will be needed and therefore a large area will be occupied. 
         [0046]    Additionally, the impedance at the connection between the two resistors i.e. the middle node, is very high i.e. 25 Mohms and, therefore, the output impedance of the voltage source is very high determining a large drop of the middle node voltage from 5.4 V, if a small current is drawn from it. Where as in solution presented in  FIG. 5  it doesn&#39;t. 
         [0047]    Furthermore, since the middle node biasing circuit is not taking current from the output node i.e. level  6  in  FIG. 5  it is also not increasing the ripple at the output node as the old solution would. 
         [0048]    Let us further observe that the middle node biasing circuit in steady state i.e. after output voltage reaches 10.77V, does not take current from input voltage e.g. 1.65V, since it circulates the current in a loop from level  1  to level  4  and then back to level  1  from level  4 . The only current loss is due to substrate leakage, which is about few Pico amperes to 1-nano amperes. In the known solution all of the current through the resistor ladder will be lost through ground. 
         [0049]    This circuit provides a better ripple performance then the known solutions in the art. This improves the SNR i.e. Signal to Noise Ratio performance of the MEMS device. 
         [0050]    Each NMOS has substrate selection switches as shown in  FIG. 8   a . All of DC-DC converters NMOS transistors have these selection switches, excepting the ones connected to ground. Each PMOS has substrate selection switches as shown in  FIG. 8   b . All of the PMOS transistors in DC-DC converter have these switches. 
         [0051]    This invention is used to provide a bias voltage to a MEMS device as e.g. a MEMS microphone as it is shown in  FIG. 9 . The Signal from the MEMS microphone is input to an Analog to Digital Converter (ADC). The higher the voltage MEMS microphone is biased with the better the sensitivity of the MEMS Microphone. The 45 p capacitor is to make sure the AC signal generate from microphone is not lost in the 10.7 VDC-DC converter but that most of it goes to ADC. 
         [0052]    Similarly 10.7V DC-DC converter can be used to bias voltage of other MEMS sensors. 
         [0053]    It is remarked that the scope of protection of the invention is not restricted to the embodiments described herein. Neither is the scope of protection of the invention restricted by the reference numerals in the claims. The word “comprising” does not exclude other parts than those mentioned in the claims. The word “a(n)” preceding an element does not exclude a plurality of those elements. Means forming part of the invention may both be implemented in the form of dedicated hardware or in the form of a programmed purpose processor. The invention resides in each new feature or combination of features.