Abstract:
An emergency exit door lock system configured to cooperate with a door hinged in a door frame for sensing when a person attempts to open the door, and for allowing the door to open after a subsequent delay. The system comprises an electromagnet affixable to a door frame for electromagnetically attracting an armature resiliently affixed at a variable armature separation distance to an armature mounting device, the device being affixable to the door. A proximity sensor including an analog Hall Effect device is mountable to the frame for detecting movement of the door away from a closed position. A controller, such as a micro-controller, receives a signal from the sensor and causes an alarm as a function of the signal. The signal is indicative of the armature separation distance, the controller being calibrate-able to provide a door alarm signal and door opening signal at any desired value of the armature separation distance.

Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to electromagnetic locks; more particularly, to an apparatus for monitoring the lock status of electromagnetic locks; and most particularly, to an improved electromagnetic lock monitoring system employing an analog Hall Effect sensor to determine a continuously variable separation between a door and a frame. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    Electromagnetic locks for securing doors or gates are well known in the prior art. In a typical installation, a magnetically-susceptible keeper plate is mounted on a door, and an electromagnet is mounted on a door frame. When the electromagnet is energized and is in contact with the keeper plate with the door closed, the plate becomes an armature for the electromagnet, thus providing a mechanism for locking the door to the frame. When the magnetic loop is complete, by contact of the armature with the electromagnet, the magnetic flux density is at a maximum. 
         [0003]    In some access control systems used, for example in doors used in conjunction with fire control and emergency exits, it is desirable to provide delayed egress through an emergency door. Delayed egress is when an access control system must provide guaranteed egress within a fixed period of time while also providing notification to security personnel during that same period of time that egress is required. During the delayed egress time period, while a small gap exists between the door and frame, the door is kept in the locked state with power continuing to be supplied to the electromagnet. At the end of the delay period, power is removed from the electromagnet thus allowing free egress. Within the time period before de-energizing, a shorter “nuisance delay” period exists to deal not only with accidental striking of the door, but also with thwarted attempts of vandalism as might be expected from young persons who would push the door, hear the alarm, and then run away. If action to open the door ceases during the nuisance delay period, the alarm also ceases and the system remains armed for the next opening attempt. On the other hand, if the attempt to open the door is sustained for longer than the nuisance delay period, say after 15 or 30 seconds, the signal to open the door becomes irrevocable, the electromagnet is de-energized at the end of the irrevocable time, and the door is permitted to fully open. Such systems are in broad use, particularly in retail establishments where they greatly reduce theft loss while complying with building codes that require a minimum number of emergency exits. 
         [0004]    In known systems, a gap can occur between the frame and the door because the keeper plate (armature) is not rigidly fastened to the door but rather floats on an armature mounting device which is fixed to the door. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,738 B1, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Consequently, pressure on the emergency door can create a gap between the door and the door frame of, typically, up to about one inch (2.54 cm.). In some security applications, it is essential that the door not be allowed to clear the frame during the nuisance delay period, to prevent passing of, for example, documents; thus, in some applications a gap as small as about 0.125 inches (0.32 cm.) must be detected. 
         [0005]    It is known in the cited prior art to employ a digital device based upon the Hall Effect, wherein the voltage potential orthogonal to a magnetic field is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field. Thus, attempted opening of an emergency door increases a starting gap between the sensor and a cooperating permanent magnet mounted on the door, reducing the strength of the sensor magnetic field, which reduction can be sensed by the Hall Effect sensor and an alarm provided by a cooperating micro-controller. 
         [0006]    A known problem in use of prior art systems, such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,738, is that the digital Hall sensor signals can alarm only when the sensor/magnet gap reaches a predetermined value. Thus, the door/frame gap for each installation requires individual physical adjustment to obtain proper correlation between a desired door/frame gap setting and the preset sensor/magnet gap. For this reason, employing a single system design to accommodate a range of desired door/frame gap settings is unwieldy. 
         [0007]    What is needed in the art is an improved Hall Effect gap detection and alarm system that may be easily set to provide an alarm at any desired gap size for any installation. 
         [0008]    It is a principal object of the present invention to simplify the setting of an alarm or nuisance gap at any desired gap size for an electromagnetic lock installation, thus making an alarm system applicable to a wide range of door/gap requirements. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0009]    Briefly described, in access control systems used in conjunction with fire control, it is desirable to be able to provide delayed egress. To make delayed egress available, a fire exit door is provided with a rim exit device and suitable circuitry to ensure that the door is alarmed either locally or remotely for several seconds following pressure on the rim exit device and prior to actual release of the door. For systems employing an electromagnetic lock, a separation between the door and the door frame can occur because the armature keeper plate is not rigidly fastened to the door but rather floats on a spring-loaded mounting unit which is fixed to the door. Consequently, pressure on the rim exit device can create a gap between the door and the door frame of up to about 1 inch (2.54 cm.). This gap is then used to sense that egress is desired while the electromagnetic lock is still energized and the door is still secure. In some applications, it is a requirement to detect a door/frame gap as small as 0.125 inch (0.32 cm.). 
         [0010]    In the prior art employing a digital Hall Effect proximity sensor, accurate and difficult adjustments of the electromagnetic lock and the spacing of the keeper plate from the door need to be made on an initial setup of a door and then may have to be frequently re-adjusted to maintain the required settings. 
         [0011]    The present invention employs an analog Hall Effect proximity sensor in place of the prior art digital Hall Effect sensor. The analog sensor produces a continuous signal indicative of the spacing of the sensor from the permanent magnet and hence the gap between the door and door frame. Calibration curves are provided to the micro-controller relating sensor signal strength to gap size. The analog Hall Effect sensor converts the magnetic field density to current that is provided to the analog-to-digital converter input of the micro-controller which stores the result. Subsequent movement of the door with respect to the frame results in a varying current input from the sensor to the micro-controller. The micro-processor then compares the new result with the old result and calculates a new value for door/frame gap, resulting in continuous, accurate measurement of the gap. Once an alarm limit for the gap is reached, a warning signal is emitted visually and/or audibly, and locally and/or remotely, to indicate that egress has been requested. Additional circuitry provides a variable duration for such annunciation, followed by eventual power removal from the electromagnetic lock, at which point the door may be opened and egress accomplished. 
         [0012]    An important benefit of an electromagnetic lock in accordance with the present invention is that, with a continuously variable analog signal over the entire range of desired gaps, a single lock model may be used on any and all applications requiring any gap alarm annunciation within that range. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0013]    The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: 
           [0014]      FIG. 1  is an isometric elevational view showing an electromagnetic lock system in accordance with the present invention installed in a door pivotably mounted to a frame; 
           [0015]      FIG. 2  is an exploded isometric drawing of an electromagnetic lock system in accordance with the present invention; 
           [0016]      FIG. 3  is a cross-sectional view of the electromagnetic lock system shown in  FIG. 2 , showing a locked door in a non-alarm position within a frame; 
           [0017]      FIG. 4  is a cross-sectional view taken along line  4 - 4  in  FIG. 3 ; 
           [0018]      FIG. 5  is a cross-sectional view like that shown in  FIG. 3 , but showing the locked door in an alarm position; 
           [0019]      FIG. 6  is a cross-sectional view taken along line  6 - 6  in  FIG. 5 ; and 
           [0020]      FIG. 7  is a graph showing sensor signal in millivolts as a function of gap distance for seven different starting gaps. 
       
    
    
       [0021]    Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate currently preferred embodiments of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner. 
       DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
       [0022]    Referring to  FIG. 1 , in an emergency delayed exit door system  01  in accordance with the present invention, door  10  is equipped with a panic bar  12  that operates a latch (not shown), the latch engaging a corresponding recess in door frame  14 . Note that the latch could also be operated by a door knob or door lever set. Mounted to door frame  14  is an electromagnet assembly  16  including electromagnet  18 . Door  10  is provided with an armature plate  20  for electromagnetically locking to electromagnet  18 . To exit, a person presses on panic bar  12  and pushes the door outward for at least the nuisance delay period. The door will then be available for egress following the expiration of the typically 15 or 30 second egress delay period. This time period can be varied in the micro-controller code, as desired. 
         [0023]      FIG. 2  shows major components of system  01  in greater detail. Electromagnet assembly  16  includes electromagnet  18 , typically having an “E” shaped electromagnet core, and analog proximity sensor assembly  24 . Electrical wires  25  serving sensor assembly  24  and electromagnet  18  feed up through the door frame header, and are not exposed. Assembly  16  includes a cover  26 . Electromagnet armature  28  having one or more alignment pins  30  to prevent rotation is fastened via fastener  32  to armature mounting bolt  34 . The shaft of armature mounting bolt  34  is fitted through a corresponding hole in door  10  ( FIG. 1 ), and is secured thereto by a post-installation cap  36  which forms part of armature mounting bolt  34 . One or more flexible washers  38  allow armature  28  to tilt slightly relative to door  10  such that armature  28  can abut electromagnet  18  in full contact with it for maximum locking hold force. The number and total thickness of washers  38  also set the initial door/frame gap spacing, as described in greater detail below in connection with  FIG. 7 . 
         [0024]    Permanent magnet  40  is also mounted to door  10  such that when door  10  is in its fully closed position, permanent magnet  40  is brought into sufficient proximity to sensor assembly  24  ( FIG. 3 ) so that sensor assembly  24  detects that the door is fully closed. Controller  80 , such as for example a micro-controller, is connected to sensor assembly  24  and electromagnet  18  by electrical wires  25 , and is also connected to alarm  82 . 
         [0025]      FIG. 3  shows the electromagnetic lock installed in a door  10  and door frame, with the door in its fully closed position. Armature  28  abuts electromagnet  18  and is electromagnetically locked to it. As shown in detail in  FIG. 4 , within an armature mounting device  54 , spring  52  defines a resilient member that biases plunger  46  into shaft  42  extending into or through door  10 . This draws armature  28  toward door  10 , thus providing a bias means mounted within a space defined by door  10  for providing a bias that urges the door toward its fully closed position. When the door is in its fully closed position, as in  FIG. 3 , permanent magnet  40  is sufficiently proximate to sensor assembly  24  by starting gap  50  to signal system controller  80  ( FIG. 2 ) that the door is in its fully closed position. 
         [0026]      FIG. 5  shows the components of  FIG. 3  when someone is attempting to exit the building. The person first pushes panic bar  12  ( FIG. 1 ) or similar door activating device to release the latch. Noting that armature  28  remains abutted to electromagnet  18 , the person is able to push the door  10  away from its fully closed position ( FIG. 3 ) to the activation position shown in  FIG. 5  as activation gap  50 ′, causing an alarm signal and initiating a “nuisance alarm” period. To do so, the person must supply sufficient external force to overcome the bias provided by spring  52 . Spring  52  must therefore provide a small enough force so that even a small or frail person can push the door to the activation position. At the same time, the spring should provide enough bias so that when the door is pushed momentarily and then released, as for example by a vandal, the door will tend to overcome the closing resistance of the latch mechanism and return the door to its fully closed position. Accordingly, spring  52  is chosen to provide a bias force in the range of approximately 11 pounds. The spring can be pre-biased to provide a more constant bias force over the travel distance of plunger  46 . Of course, the preferred force may be affected by development of building codes, as those codes develop with respect to systems such as that disclosed herein by themselves or in combination with other mechanisms attached to the door which may provide additional bias force. For example, the door may be equipped with a conventional door closer, and building codes may be passed that specify the maximum total force necessary to overcome the combination of mechanisms and open the door. 
         [0027]    As shown in  FIGS. 5 and 6 , the external force applied to the door by a person wishing to exit causes plunger  46  to be drawn outward from tubular shaft  42 , thus compressing spring  52 . Since tubular shaft  42  is positioned within the hole in door  10 , as the door is moved plunger  46  moves within the volume defined by door  10  in a direction corresponding to the thickness of the door. As used herein, the phrase “within” the door will be understood to mean “at least partially within” the door. Plunger  46  is free to move a distance of about one inch (2.54 cm.). If maximum possible travel distance is desired, armature mounting bolt head  44  could be formed such that plunger  46  extends into head  44  when the system is in its unforced state. In theory, this would allow plunger  46  to move a distance as much as or even more than the width of door  10 . By allowing the plunger to move within the distance defined by the door thickness, the present invention achieves a much greater movement distance than could be achieved with prior art systems. These prior art systems provided only limited movement of the door, since slack was provided only within the armature plate. Since typical armature plates are on the order of one-half inch (1.27 cm), the total allowed lineal movement was small. In contrast, a typical security door is on the order of 1¾ inch (3.4 cm) thick. The present system therefore allows travel distances of at least about one inch (2.54 cm.). 
         [0028]    There are several advantages to this greater travel distance. The first is that the activation distance  50 ′ can be set far enough such that clearances within the space of the usual slack in the latch will not cause a false initiation of the system. 
         [0029]    A second advantage is that it provides greater tactile and visual feedback to the person attempting to make an emergency exit. This provides greater assurance to a possibly panic-stricken individual that the door is functioning properly and will release shortly. 
         [0030]    A third advantage is that with a greater travel distance, the sensors that sense when someone is attempting to exit need not be as precise in their ability to measure that the door has been moved a specified amount. This allows sensors to be more economical, more tamper-resistant, and/or easier to install and maintain. 
         [0031]    The present system includes a sensor assembly  24  comprising an analog Hall Effect proximity sensor to sense when the door has been moved in an attempt to exit the building. A suitable analog sensor is, for example, Model ACS712, available from Allegro Microsystems, Inc., Worcester, Mass., USA. 
         [0032]    Referring now to  FIGS. 3 through 7 , analog sensor  24  produces a continuous signal the value of which is indicative of an instantaneous sensor separation distance  50 ′ from permanent magnet  40  which is proportional to an armature separation distance  53 , between the armature and a door reference surface, and thus to a door/frame gap (not shown) as expressed in  FIG. 7 . Preferably, analog Hall Effect sensor  24  is oriented north-pole seeking, as in  FIG. 7 , in which orientation the Hall output signal ranges from 0 volts (highest gauss) to 2500 millivolts (lowest gauss). If the sensor is oriented south-pole seeking, the Hall output signal ranges from 5000 millivolts (highest gauss) to 2500 millivolts (lowest gauss). Calibration curves, e.g., exemplary curves  60 ,  62 ,  64 ,  66 ,  68 ,  70 ,  72 , are provided to the micro-controller relating sensor signal strength to gap size. Because various door/frame combinations can require different starting positions of armature  28  with respect to door reference surface  11 , the number of spacer washers  38  may be varied upon installation of the system to accommodate a given door/frame spacing. It will be seen from  FIG. 7 , however, that increasing the number of spacer washers  38  serves to increase the size of starting gap  50 . Thus the shape of the sensor response curve is a function of the total thickness of washers  38 , expressed in  FIG. 7  as the number of washers. Curve  60  represents 0 washers, and curves  62 ,  64 ,  66 ,  68 ,  70 ,  72  represent 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 washers, respectively. It will further be seen that increasing the size of starting gap  50  reduces the slope of the response curve, indicating a reduction in sensitivity of the sensor system. Preferably, no more than three washers are to be employed, although obviously the system is still effective with up to twice that number. Analog Hall Effect sensor  24  converts the field density of magnet  40  to current that is provided to the analog-to-digital converter input for the micro-controller  80  which stores the result. Subsequent movement of door  10  with respect to the frame results in a varying current input to the analog-to-digital converter input for the micro-controller-which compares the new result with the old result and calculates a new value for door/frame gap, resulting in continuous, accurate measurement of the gap. The system may be set to alarm at any predetermined desired millivolt value over the entire range of output of the sensor. 
         [0033]    If the alarm condition (the “delay initiating signal”) persists for more than the programmed nuisance delay, typically, only a few seconds, the system micro-controller begins a predetermined egress delay countdown, at the end of which (typically, about 15 seconds) the micro-controller issues a door unlock signal that causes electromagnet  18  to be de-energized. It will be noted that the magnetic field created by electromagnet  18  is sufficiently confined and directed such that the field does not affect the operation of the sensor within sensor assembly  24 . 
         [0034]    While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.