Abstract:
A graphical input and display system having a user interface for selecting and creating image object elements includes input devices permitting a user to manipulate elements of electronic images. A processor, connected to the system, receives requests for various image object selection operations and also accesses a memory structure. The system memory structure includes a user interaction module, which allows a user to select image objects, an image object selection module for interpreting imprecise image object selection paths, and data memory.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
         [0001]    The following copending applications, Attorney Docket Number D/A1596, U.S. application Ser. No. ______, filed Mar. 22, 2002, titled “Method and System for Overloading Loop Selection Commands in a System for Selecting and Arranging Visible Material in Document Images”, Attorney Docket Number D/A1597, U.S. application Ser. No. ______, filed Mar. 22, 2002, titled “Method for Gestural Interpretation in a System for Selecting and Arranging Visible Material in Document Images”, and Attorney Docket Number D/A1598, U.S. application Ser. No. ______, filed Mar. 22, 2002, titled “System and Method for Editing Electronic Images”, are assigned to the same assignee of the present application. The entire disclosures of these copending applications are totally incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.  
         INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE  
         [0002]    The following U.S. patents are fully incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Pat. No. 5,485,565 to Saund et al. (“Gestural Indicators for Selecting Graphic Objects”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,513,309 to Meier et al. (“Graphic Editor User Interface for a Pointer-Based Computer System”); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,760,773 to Berman et al. (“Methods and Apparatus for Interacting with Data Objects Using Action Handles”).  
         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0003]    This invention relates generally to user interfaces to computational devices, and more particularly to applications in which displayed objects are selected and arranged in document images.  
           [0004]    Two types of interactive drawing/sketching/editing applications are currently in use, both of which support creation of new image material, through draw operations, and selection and manipulation of existing material, through editing operations. The types of interactive applications are distinguished by the emphasis placed on “sketch” and “editing” operations. In an image “editing” program, selection and manipulation of image objects is the primary activity. Therefore, stylus or mouse interaction is designed primarily to interpret stylus input as selection gestures, and the default interpretation of mouse or stylus activity is selection of existing image objects for manipulation. Tools for drawing objects are provided by auxiliary command objects, usually menus.  
           [0005]    In a “sketch” program, however, the primary activity is the “draw” operation. To facilitate the sketching process, it is important for users to be able to quickly execute a series of markings such as handwritten or sketched strokes, without having to perform a menu initiation command at every stroke. These programs are designed such that draw operations can be the default interpretation of mouse or stylus activity. The disadvantage to this type of program is that when priority is placed on draw operations, selection operations become demoted and require explicit menu choices or button clicks to invoke a selection, which impedes the smooth flow of multiple selection and manipulation operations.  
           [0006]    In both types of interactive applications, it can be very difficult to select and move, delete, or otherwise modify salient collections of markings at will. In particular, users are sometimes imprecise in the ways that they draw encircling gestures to select image objects for further manipulation. They may unintentionally clip off a piece of an image object they intend to select. At other times, they may actually intend to split off the very same piece of this image object. One of the major drawbacks to existing graphical editors is their inability to interpret selection gestures in light of precomputed perceptual objects, so that imprecise gestures may be interpreted to either deliver the literal objects defined by the gesture, or the perceptually significant objects identified in the precomputation stage.  
           [0007]    U.S. Pat. No. 5,485,565 to Saund et al. titled “Gestural Indicators for Selecting Graphic Objects” discloses a graphical imaging system, in which the rough location, size and shape of objects in the image is summarized by a first characteristic descriptor, representing a parametric “pose” computed for each object. A second characteristic descriptor, for example a “gesture matching” function, is provided in order to select the single object, or the set of objects, that best comports with the user&#39;s selection gesture. When most closely matched, these key characteristic descriptors permit simple and natural user gestures to distinguish among a large set of graphic objects that may overlap both spatially. User gestures can be simple slashes passing through the object, or quick, coarse approximations of objects&#39; shapes.  
           [0008]    U.S. Pat. No. 5,513,309 to Meier et al. titled “Graphic Editor User Interface for a Pointer-Based Computer System” discloses a graphical editor arranged to permit the user to edit selected graphic objects by highlighting the objects and moving them with editing handles. A bounding box is also drawn about the selected portions of the object. In various aspects of the invention, the user is permitted to edit the object by executing specific actions, including resizing, duplicating, distorting and moving either the entire object or only selected portions. After any of the editing operations is performed, the display is updated to reflect changes made during the editing step.  
           [0009]    U.S. Pat. No. 5,760,773 to Berman et al. titled “Methods and Apparatus for Interacting with Data Objects Using Action Handles” teaches a central processing unit coupled to a pointer control device such as a pen, stylus or mouse, that permits the user to selectively position a pointer and activate an action handle on a display associated with a data object. Activation of the action handle signals the central processing unit of selections associated with the data object. Tapping or clicking on the action handle causes display of a context menu containing at least one command that may be invoked with respect to the data object. Dragging the action handle indicates movement or dragging of the action handle and the corresponding data object for an operation associated with dragging such as drag-and-drop.  
           [0010]    The present invention offers a new tool for computer assisted drawing, one that provides users with the ability to make imprecise selection gestures while the application applies certain rules and image analysis operations to infer the user&#39;s intent.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0011]    Briefly stated, and in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is disclosed herein a graphical input and display system having a user interface for selecting and creating image object elements and includes input devices permitting a user to manipulate elements of electronic images. A processor, connected to the system, receives requests for various image object selection operations and also accesses a memory structure. The system memory structure includes a user interaction module, which allows a user to select image objects, an image object selection module for interpreting imprecise image object selection paths, and data memory.  
           [0012]    In another aspect of the invention, there is disclosed a method for utilizing a user interface on a graphical input and display system for interpreting imprecise image object selection paths. After image material is selected, the system evaluates the characteristics of the selection path and also evaluates the proximity of the image material to the selection gesture. The image objects affected by the image object selection gesture are manipulated to identify those image objects to be selected.  
           [0013]    In yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided an article of manufacture in the form of a computer usable medium having computer readable program code embodied in the medium. When the program code is executed by the computer, the computer usable medium causes the computer to perform method steps for interpreting imprecise image object selection gestures. The program readable code causes the computer to evaluate carefulness along an image object selection path which has been input by a user. The program code then causes the computer to form a tolerance tunnel, which includes an inner tunnel boundary and an outer tunnel boundary. The image objects affected by the selection gesture are then manipulated to determine which image objects are selected.  
           [0014]    In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a memory for storing data for access by a program being executed on a computer for interpreting imprecise image object selection gestures. The memory includes an input image data structure and a primary image objects data structure. A selection path data structure is also stored in the memory, as is a tolerance tunnel data structure, which defines the tolerance tunnel identified for each imprecise image object selection gesture. The object boundary data structure and selected objects data structure are also stored within the memory. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0015]    The foregoing and other features of the instant invention will be apparent and easily understood from a further reading of the specification, claims and by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:  
         [0016]    [0016]FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing general components of a system that can interpret imprecise selection paths according to the invention;  
         [0017]    [0017]FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing steps in interpreting an imprecise selection path according to one embodiment of the present invention;  
         [0018]    [0018]FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing steps in interpreting an imprecise selection path according to another embodiment of the present invention;  
         [0019]    [0019]FIG. 4 illustrates the processing steps according to the embodiment of the present invention of FIG. 3;  
         [0020]    [0020]FIG. 5 is a flow chart showing steps in interpreting an imprecise selection path according to yet another embodiment of the present invention; and  
         [0021]    [0021]FIG. 6 illustrates interpretation of selection rectangles according to the invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
       [0022]    Disclosed herein is a method for interpreting imprecise selection paths in a system for selecting and arranging visible material in document images. In the following description numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It would be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art to practice the invention without such specific details. In other instances, specific implementation details such as parsing techniques for extracting characters from a document image, have not been shown in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.  
         [0023]    As will become apparent in the description below, the present invention finds particular advantage in editing text and line art contained in an image. Documents which are faxed or which are copied on a digital copier typically involve images that contain primarily text and graphics. As described with respect to the prior art, it is common that in order to edit any of the text contained in the image, extraneous processing such as Optical Character Recognition (OCR) or the placement of image information into layers must be performed. As will become apparent, the present invention minimizes the need for extraneous processing and provides added flexibility to defining both text and graphical image information so as to allow the editing of a wider range of textual and graphical data in an image.  
         [0024]    Referring now to FIG. 1, system  100  includes processor  110 , connected to receive signals from image input device  120  and user input device  130 . Image input device  120  could be a scanner, a facsimile receiver or other image receiver, a camera, or other appropriate device or could be a part of local or remote memory that stores an image in digital form. User input device  130  could, for example, be a keyboard with a mouse. Processor  110  can also be connected to image output device  140 , such as a screen display, a printer, a facsimile transmitter or other image transmitter, or a part of local or remote memory that can store an image in digital form.  
         [0025]    Processor  110  is also connected to access program memory  150  and data memory  160 . Program memory  150  includes user interaction module  152 , image object boundary detection module  154 , path matching module  156 , and may also include an optional object splitting module  158 . Data memory  160  includes image input data structure  162 , primary image objects data structure  164 , object group data structure  166 , selection path data structure  168 , tolerance tunnel data structure  170 , object boundary data structure  172 , and selected objects data structure  174 .  
         [0026]    [0026]FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the method for interpreting imprecise selection gestures in situations in which image objects are presented as independent image objects in a display. In FIG. 2 flowchart  200  shows the steps for interpreting imprecise gestures in this situation and the illustrations beside the flowchart show examples of the processing steps. Initially, a display contains the characters “G”, “r”, “e”, “e”, “n”, “O” and “P” at example  212 . At step  210 , a user inputs a selection gesture, shown as path  216  in example  212 . In this example, the gesture begins at point  215  and ends at the arrow. On the left side of path  216 , approaching and leaving point  218 , the path has high velocity, and the path has low velocity on the right side of path  216 , approaching and leaving point  214 . The user interaction module collects the path of the user&#39;s gesture and passes it to step  220  for evaluation as to carefulness along the selection gesture path. At each location along the selection gesture, the user&#39;s application of gesture drawing carefulness is evaluated. Various approaches may be used to evaluate carefulness, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. One example approach is application of the expression  
         [0027]    T=p(v/r′),  
         [0028]    where P is a constant taking the value 10,000, v is velocity in pixels per second, and r′ is given by  
         [0029]    min(r, max_R),  
         [0030]    where r is the radius of curvature at that location along the path, and max_R is a constant taking the value 800. This definition of carefulness yields a Tolerance Factor, T, in units of pixels. This value is a tolerance on the distance from the selection path permitted for image objects that would otherwise be split by a careful selection gesture. Thus carefulness approaches a minimum value of 0 pixels when the velocity is small or the radius of curvature is high, and it approaches a maximum value of approximately 50 pixels when path velocity is large and the path is relatively straight. The tolerance factor is used to define the inner boundary and outer boundary with respect to the selection path. In this example, these boundaries form a “tolerance tunnel”, whose center axis is the selection path and whose width is the tolerance factor. Although in this example a tolerance tunnel is utilized to describe a bounded region, numerous other techniques may be similarly utilized and are fully contemplated and embraced within the scope of this invention. In the example, selection path  222  is bounded by a tolerance tunnel defined by tolerance tunnel paths  224  and  226 . The tolerance tunnel approaches a minimum as it passes along the right side of selection path  222 , where the gesture velocity was low; it approaches a maximum as it passes along the left side of selection path  222 , where the gesture velocity was high. The tolerance factor is shown as tolerance tunnel width  228 .  
         [0031]    At step  230  each foreground image object is considered with respect to the tolerance tunnel. If an image object is found to lie entirely inside the outer boundary of the tolerance tunnel, then that object is selected. If an image object is found to lie entirely outside the inner boundary of the tolerance tunnel, then that object is rejected. If the dimensions of the image object extend beyond both boundaries of the tolerance tunnel, then the image object is split according to the selection path, and only the portion inside the path is selected. Optionally, this method may be implemented in such a way that image objects are not split, but are either selected or rejected from selection based on the area of the object falling inside the outer tolerance tunnel boundary versus outside the inner tolerance tunnel boundary, or other similar criteria. In the example, the objects “G”, “r”, “e”, “e” and “n” lie entirely inside the outer boundary  224  of the tolerance tunnel and are selected. The object “P” lies entirely outside the inner boundary  226  of the tolerance tunnel, and is rejected. The object “O” extends beyond both boundaries of the tolerance tunnel and is split according to the selection path at  232 . The resulting set of selected objects is shown at  234  and the resulting set of not selected objects is shown at  236 .  
         [0032]    [0032]FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate another embodiment of the method for interpreting imprecise selection gestures in situations in which image objects may belong to groups. In FIG. 3 flowchart  300  shows the steps for interpreting imprecise gestures in this situation and FIG. 4 illustrates and example of the processing steps. Initially, a display may contain characters  410  forming the words “Green”, “O”, “Red” and “Purple”, in the arrangement shown at  400  in FIG. 4. The system data memory contains data structures indicating that the characters form four groups, as illustrated. Numerous types of data structures may perform this function, including lists, arrays, and sets of pointers. At step  310  in FIG. 3, the user interaction module collects the path of the user&#39;s gesture and passes that information to step  320 , in which carefulness along the selection gesture is evaluated. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the gesture begins at point  412  and ends at arrow  414 . Path  420  has high velocity on the left side and bottom of the path, but low velocity on the right side of path  420 , where it crosses the “O”, as shown at location  425 .  
         [0033]    Referring now to FIG. 3, at step  320 , at each location along the selection gesture, the user&#39;s degree of gesture drawing carefulness is evaluated. A tolerance factor is computed at each location along the selection gesture, and a tolerance tunnel is formed, as described hereinabove. This step is illustrated in FIG. 4, where gesture  420  is the user&#39;s selection path which is bounded by inner tolerance tunnel boundary  424  and outer tolerance tunnel boundary  422 .  
         [0034]    At step  330  in FIG. 3, each image object is evaluated with respect to the selection gesture path and the tolerance tunnel representing selection gesture carefulness. Each image object is assigned a categorical value depending on its proximity to the two tolerance tunnel boundaries. One possible set of categorical values may include  
         [0035]    I: inside the inner tolerance tunnel boundary;  
         [0036]    II: outside the outer tolerance tunnel boundary;  
         [0037]    III: between the inner and outer tolerance tunnel boundaries;  
         [0038]    IV: spans the inner tolerance tunnel boundary;  
         [0039]    V: spans the outer tolerance tunnel boundary; or  
         [0040]    VI: spans both tolerance tunnel boundaries.  
         [0041]    This step is illustrated in FIG. 4 at chart  430 . As shown in the chart, “reen” fall inside the inner tolerance boundary  424  and are in category I. “R” falls outside outer tolerance tunnel boundary  422  and resides in category II. Objects “d” and “urpe” lie between inner and outer tolerance tunnel boundaries  424  and  422  and are in category III. Objects “G”, “P” and “l” span inner tolerance tunnel boundary  424  and reside in category IV. Object “e” spans outer tolerance tunnel boundary  422 , placing it in category V, while object “O” spans both tolerance tunnel boundaries, placing it in category VI.  
         [0042]    Referring again to FIG. 3, at step  340  objects assigned to category VI are split according to the selection gesture path. The portions of these objects falling inside the selection gesture path are selected. This is illustrated in FIG. 4, where object “O” has been split and partial object  450  has been selected and partial object  452  was not selected.  
         [0043]    At step  350  in FIG. 3, each remaining group is evaluated in turn, and all of the image objects in the group are selected or rejected based, for example, on a weighted vote for that group. The weighting of each vote is the pixel area of the image object. Each image object votes as follows, according to its tunnel proximity category:  
                                                                 Category   Vote                                        I   2           II   −2           III   0           IV   1           V   −1                      
 
         [0044]    At step  360  group selection/rejection votes are used to assign selection/rejection decisions to individual objects. For each group, if the weighted vote is greater than 0, then all of the image objects comprising that group are selected. If the weighted vote is less than 0, then none of these objects are selected. If some image object belongs to more than one group and these groups are not either all selected or all rejected, then a second weighted vote is taken of all the groups to which the image object belongs. The weighting is the pixel area of all image objects forming the group. Groups that are selected vote the value 1, groups that are not selected vote the value −1. If the result is greater than 0, then the object in question is selected; if the result is less than 0, then the object in question is not selected. This is illustrated in FIG. 4, which shows the groups “Purple” and “Green”  460  as selected and the group “Red”  470  as not selected. The group “Green O”  480  is not evaluated.  
         [0045]    [0045]FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of the method for interpreting imprecise selection gestures in situations in which the image material to be selected exists as undifferentiated image objects, such as connected components, characters, words, lines of text, or individual figures. This method finds beneficial application when the image is represented as a single raster bitmap containing foreground image objects on a field of background pixel values. In FIG. 500 flowchart  300  shows the steps for interpreting imprecise gestures in this situation. Input image data is received at step  510 . In this embodiment, prior to or subsequent to the user performing a selection operation, boundaries between perceptual image objects are computed at step  520  using various techniques of computational geometry, for example the Distance Transform and the Voronoi diagram, both of which are well known in the art. Local maxima (ridges) of the distance transform, or ridges provided by the Voronoi diagram, or an equivalent, are then passed through a filter at step  530  to retain only significant ridges. Persons skilled in the art are aware of techniques for discarding insignificant ridge points whose direction vectors to generating points fall at an acute angle.  
         [0046]    When the user&#39;s selection gesture is input at step  550 , points along the gesture are evaluated for degree of carefulness at step  560 . For complete selection gestures or portions of selection gestures whose carefulness value falls below a threshold, an attempt is made to find a path through significant Voronoi ridges that approximates the selection path, at step  540 . This may be accomplished through use of a variant on the A* search technique called path-matching, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,485,565 “Gestural Indicators for Selecting Graphic Objects” cited hereinabove. This path is used finally to define the selection region used to select foreground objects for subsequent processing at step  570 .  
         [0047]    Referring now to FIG. 6, another aspect of this invention permits the user&#39;s selection rectangles to be used not as literal definitions of regions within which image material should be selected, but as approximate specifiers of image material to be selected. FIG. 6 shows an example in which the user&#39;s selection rectangle  610  intersects characters, but in which the user&#39;s intent was likely to be to select only and entirely the characters “on projects”. The embodiments of the present invention described hereinabove may be used with rectangle drag selection gestures as well as with drawn freeform paths. In place of estimates of carefulness along sections of the selection gesture, the entire boundary of the selection rectangle is assigned a value of carefulness based on the speed at which the rectangle is dragged, or else by a specific action by the user. For example, under one possible user interface design, if in the course of performing the rectangle drag the user moves the dragged corner of the rectangle back and forth several times, then the rectangle is assigned a low carefulness value (for example, 0.2) and this is used in the course of processing as described hereinabove to select or exclude image material that might fall beyond or within the rectangle&#39;s precise bounds, respectively.  
         [0048]    While the present invention has been illustrated and described with reference to specific embodiments, further modification and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art. Although discussed with reference to text and line art, the operations illustrated herein apply equally well to any type of image object. Additionally, “code” as used herein, or “program” as used herein, is any plurality of binary values or any executable, interpreted or compiled code which can be used by a computer or execution device to perform a task. This code or program can be written in any one of several known computer languages. A “computer”, as used herein, can mean any device which stores, processes, routes, manipulates, or performs like operation on data. It is to be understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular forms illustrated and that it is intended in the appended claims to embrace all alternatives, modifications, and variations which do not depart from the spirit and scope of this invention.