Abstract:
Atomic layer deposition is used to provide a solid film on a plurality of disc shaped substrates. The substrates are entered spaced apart in a boat, in a furnace and heated to deposition temperature. In the furnace the substrate is exposed to alternating and sequential pulses of at least two mutually reactive reactants, in such way that the deposition temperature is high enough to prevent condensation of the at least two reactants on the surface but not high enough to result in significant thermal decomposition of each of the at least two reactants individually.

Description:
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION  
       [0001]    This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/611,536, filed on Jul. 7, 2000. 
     
    
     
       FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
         [0002]    The present invention relates to a method for the deposition of a thin film onto a substrate by the technique of Atomic Layer Deposition.  
         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0003]    In the technique of Atomic Layer Deposition a substrate is exposed sequentially and alternately to at least two mutually reactive reactants. The substrate is heated to a temperature that is high enough to prevent condensation of the reactants but low enough to prevent thermal decomposition of each of the reactants. The substrate is exposed to the first reactant and the first reactant is chemisorbed onto the surface of the substrate until the surface is occupied with a monolayer of the first reactant. Then the chemisorption saturates and excess reactant is exhausted. Then the supply of the first reactant is cut-off and the reaction chamber is evacuated and/or purged to remove the traces of non-chemisorbed first reactant from the gas phase. Then the substrate is exposed to the second reactant which reacts with the chemisorbed first reactant under the formation of a solid film and the release of gaseous reaction products until the monolayer of the first reactant has fully reacted with the second reactant and the surface of the substrate is covered with a chemisorbed monolayer of the second reactant. Then the process saturates and excess of the second reactant is exhausted. This cycle can be repeated a number of times until a sufficiently thick film has been deposited onto the substrate. More than two reactants can be used, in particular for the deposition of ternary or more complicated compounds or multilayers. This technique has been known since 1980, see the review article of Suntola, “Atomic Layer Epitaxy” in: “Handbook of Christal Growth 3, Thin Films and Epitaxy, part B: Growth Mechanisms and Dynamics,” by D. T. J. Hurle, Ed. Elsevier, 1994, Chapter 14, p 601-663. Because only a monolayer of the material is deposited per cycle, a sufficient number of cycles needs to be executed to achieve the required film thickness. In order to minimize the cycle time without compromising the effectiveness of the purging of the reactor, the volume of the reactor has been minimized and the flow dynamics of the reactor has been optimized. A first example of the reactor is given in U.S. Pat. No. 5,711,811 which is incorporated herein by reference. This patent describes a reactor in which a plurality of substrates can be processed simultaneously. In this reactor, a stack of narrowly spaced substrates is formed and the direction of the gas flow is parallel to the main surfaces of the substrates, an inlet located at one side of a substrate surface and the exhaust located at the other side of the substrate surface. Although it is an advantage that a plurality of substrates can be processed simultaneously, making the relatively slow technique more economical, it is a disadvantage that the formation of the stack of substrates needs to be carried out manually. In Finnish patent application Ser. No. 991,078 of Microchemistry Oy is a single wafer reactor for Atomic Layer Deposition is described which allows robotic loading and unloading of the substrate. The disadvantage of the reactor is that only one wafer is processed at a time, using the relatively slow Atomic Layer Deposition technique. It is the object of the present invention to overcome these disadvantages and provide a method for operating the Atomic Layer Deposition technique that allows batch processing and robotic handling of the waters.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0004]    In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the Atomic Layer Deposition process is operated in a vertical hot wall LPCVD batch reactor. In such a reactor the lower end of the vertically elongated reaction chamber is provided with an opening for insertion and removal of a boat which comprises a number of mutually spaced supports to support the substrates in the horizontal orientation wherein the stack of mutually spaced substrates extends in the vertical direction. The reaction chamber is provided with at least one reactant inlet and a reactant exhaust as that a flow in the vertical direction is created. In the vertical direction the transport of reactants is determined by forced convective flow from the inlet end of the reactor towards the exhaust end of the reactor. In the narrow gap between the substrates, the transport of reactants is determined by diffusion. This occurs at a slower rate than the transport in the vertical direction. However, because of the large number of substrates, typically 50 to 200, cycle times which are an order of magnitude larger than the cycle times in a single wafer reactor can easily be accepted.  
           [0005]    In normal Atomic Layer Deposition enough reactant needs to be supplied to saturate all the available surface sites with reactant. In the method of the present invention, in addition to this requirement, the supplied reactant should be given the opportunity to distribute itself over the whole batch of wafers. To this end, the present invention proposes to supply the reactant, eventually mixed with an inert gas like nitrogen, at one end of the reaction chamber while pumping at the other end of the reaction chamber such that during the period of supply of the reactant the volume of the reaction chamber is replaced a sufficient amount of times to reach even distribution but not so often that the required time per pulse becomes uneconomical long. Therefore, it is proposed to replace the volume of the reactor during the period of supply of the reactant at least one time to a maximum of 50 times, taken into account the average pressure in the reaction chamber during the period of supply of the reactant.  
           [0006]    In a preferred embodiment it is proposed that during the time in between successive reactant pulses the reactor is evacuated and at least during part of this time an inert gas is fed into the reactor to drive the previous reactant pulse out of the annular space of the reactor while additionally during part of this time a pressure in the reactor is lower than the average pressure during the reactant exposure to allow diffusion of the reactant out of the narrow gap between the substrates.  
           [0007]    In an alternative embodiment, following the Atomic Layer Deposition treatment, the substrate is possibly heated to a second temperature and reactants for a chemical vapor deposition process are introduced into the reactor. After completion of the deposition by chemical vapor deposition the supply of reactants is cut-off and after evacuating and/or purging the reaction chamber and when required backfilling it to atmospheric pressure, the substrate is removed from the reaction chamber.  
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0008]    [0008]FIG. 1 Furnace with gas schematic.  
         [0009]    [0009]FIG. 2 Detailed part of cross-section through reaction chamber shown in FIG. 1 with wafers.  
         [0010]    [0010]FIG. 3 Gas flows and pressure as a function of time. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT  
       [0011]    [0011]FIG. 1 gives a schematical presentation of a gas system and furnace utilized for an embodiment of the method according to the invention for the purpose of tantalum oxide deposition. The furnace in its entirety is indicated by  1 , the process tube by  2  and an inner liner by  3  which inner liner delimits a reaction chamber  4 . The process tube  2  is surrounded by a heating element, not shown. A plurality of wafer like substrates  10  is placed in a holder  11  which holder is supported by a pedestal  12 . The pedestal is supported by a doorplate  13  which closes the reaction chamber  4 . The process tube  2  and inner liner  3  are supported by a flange  20 . Gas is injected into the process chamber  4  by the gas supply lines  40  and  41 , either directly or via a gas injector  42 . The gas is exhausted via the gap between inner liner and process tube, through the gas exhaust line  30  towards the pump (not shown). A container with tantalum penta ethoxide  50  is connected to a nitrogen supply line  43  to be able to put the liquid source material under pressure. The flow of liquid source material is measured by liquid flow meter  54 . In vaporizer unit  55  the flow of liquid source material is controlled, mixed with nitrogen and vaporized. The vaporized flow is fed into the gas supply line  41  by opening valve  56 . Alternatively, before and after feeding the vaporized flow into the reactor, the flow can be directed towards the pump (not shown) by opening valve  57  while valve  56  is closed. The flow of nitrogen to the vaporizer unit  55  is controlled by mass flow controller  62  whereas mass flow controller  72  controls a flow of nitrogen directly fed into the gas supply line  41 . Mass flow controllers  82 ,  92  and  102  control the flows of respectively H 2 O, O 2  and N 2 , fed into the reactor via gas supply line  40 . Pneumatically operated shut-off valves  61 ,  71 ,  81 ,  91  and  101  provide in means to isolate the respective mass flow controllers from the gas supply lines at the upstream side and pneumatically operated valves  63 ,  73 ,  83 ,  93  and  103  provide in means to isolate the mass flow controllers at the downstream side. Shut-off valve  51  can isolate the tantalum penta ethoxide container  50  from the nitrogen supply line  43 . Closing shut-off valve  53  interrupts the liquid tantalum penta ethoxide flow and opening valve  52  allows purging of the liquid flow controller  54  by N 2 .  
         [0012]    In FIG. 2, the gas flow geometry and wafer mounting are shown in more detail. Between the circumference of the circular wafer and the inner diameter of the inner liner is an annular space. Gas is transported in this annular space by means of forced convection. In the spacing between the wafers, gas transport occurs by diffusion.  
         [0013]    In FIG. 3, examples of sequences of gas flows and of the corresponding pressure in the process tube as a function of time are presented. In a first example, presented in FIG. 3 a , an inert gas flow is fed into the reactor in between the successive reactant pulses to drive the previous reactant pulse out of the reaction chamber. Although evacuation alone will remove the reactant from the reaction chamber, the concentration of the reactant will decrease with time roughly according to an exponential curve. In the initial stage the removal of the reactant from the chamber is efficient but in the exponential tail the removal is inefficient. The inert gas flow during the evacuation is instrumental in rapidly expelling this exponential tail. By selecting the inert gas flow and/or the pump capacity such that the pressure during the inert gas flow is lower than the pressure during the reactant pulses, the reactant can more easily diffuse out of the gap between the wafers towards the annular space where it is transported by convective flow towards the exhaust. Typically, also an inert gas flow will be applied during the flow of the reactant because it serves as a carrier gas for the reactant. FIGS. 3 b - d  shows three examples. A particularly preferred embodiment is shown in FIG. 3 d  wherein between the reactant pulses part of the time an inert gas flow is present and during part of the time no inert gas flow is present. In this way the advantages of both situations are exploited to the full extend: the inert gas flow to drive the reactant out of the annular space and a very low pressure to promote diffusion of the reactant out of the gap between the wafers. The interruption of the N 2  flow in between successive reactant pulses can be applied more than once in order to achieve a very efficient “cycle purging.” 
       EXAMPLE 1  
       [0014]    A specific example of a process in accordance with the invention is the following. After inserting a holder containing a plurality of substrates into a hot wall batch reactor, the substrates are heated to 220° C. As a first reactant, Tantalum Pentaethoxide (TAETO,=Ta—(0C 2 H 5 ) 5 ) mixed with nitrogen is admitted into the reactor while pumping at the exhaust end of the reactor and maintaining a pressure of 1 Torr. The temperature of the vessel containing the (TAETO) is maintained at 35° C. A nitrogen pressure is applied to the vessel and a flow and liquid TAETO corresponding to a vapor flow of 9 sccm, is fed from the vessel into an evaporator. A flow of nitrogen of 500 sccm is also fed into the evaporator. TAETO vapor, together with the nitrogen gas flow is fed from the evaporator into the reactor. The duration of the TAETO exposure is 2 min. After cut-off of the TAETO supply the reactor is purged for 2 minutes with approximately 500 sccm N 2 , the N 2  flow is interrupted for 30 seconds while the evacuation is continued and the N 2  flow is switched on again for 2 minutes. Then a flow of water vapor of 500 sccm is supplied to the reactor during 2 minutes, followed by a purge/evacuate/purge sequence. This whole cycle is repeated a number of times, according to the required film thickness. Finally, the reaction chamber is purged/evacuated, the chamber backfilled to 1 atm. if required, and the holder with wafers is unloaded from the reaction chamber.  
         [0015]    In an advantageous embodiment, during the supply of the TAETO via injector  42 , a nitrogen flow is fed into the reactor via line  40 , preventing the upstream diffusion of the TAETO vapor to the relatively cool flange ( 20 ) and door plate ( 13 ) where it could give rise to loosely adhering deposits, flaking and particles.