Abstract:
According to the invention, there is provided an inbred corn line, designated PHW06. This invention thus relates to the plants and seeds of inbred corn line PHW06 and to methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred line PHW06 with itself or with another corn plant. This invention further relates to hybrid corn seeds and plants produced by crossing the inbred line PHW06 with another corn line or plant and to crosses with related species.

Description:
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/542,356 filed on Jun. 20, 1990 , now abandoned. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention is in the field of corn breeding, specifically relating to an inbred corn line designated PHW06. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The goal of plant breeding is to combine in a single variety/hybrid various desirable traits. For field crops, these traits may include resistance to diseases and insects, tolerance to heat and drought, reducing the time to crop maturity, greater yield, and better agronomic quality. With mechanical harvesting of many crops, uniformity of plant characteristics such as germination and stand establishment, growth rate, maturity, and fruit size, is important. 
     Field crops are bred through techniques that take advantage of the plant&#39;s method of pollination. A plant is self-pollinated if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant. A plant is cross-pollinated if the pollen comes from a flower on a different plant. 
     Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type for many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny. A cross between two homozygous lines produce a uniform population of hybrid plants that may be heterozygous for many gene loci. A cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of gene loci will produce a population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and will not be uniform. 
     Corn plants (Zea mays L.) can be bred by both self-pollination and cross-pollination techniques. Corn has separate male and female flowers on the same plant, located on the tassel and the ear, respectively. Natural pollination occurs in corn when wind blows pollen from the tassels to the silks that protrude from the tops of the incipient ears. 
     The development of corn hybrids requires the development of homozygous inbred lines, the crossing of these lines, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods are used to develop inbred lines from breeding populations. Breeding programs combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more inbred lines or various other broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new inbred lines are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with other inbred lines and the hybrids from these crosses are evaluated to determine which of those have commercial potential. 
     Pedigree breeding starts with the crossing of two genotypes, each of which may have one or more desirable characteristics that is lacking in the other or which complement the other. If the two original parents do not provide all of the desired characteristics, other sources can be included in the breeding population. In the pedigree method, superior plants are selfed and selected in successive generations. In the succeeding generations the heterozygous condition gives way to homogeneous lines as a result of self-pollination and selection. Typically in the pedigree method of breeding five or more generations of selfing and selection is practiced: F 1  →F 2  ; F 2  →F 3  ; F 3  →F 4  ; F 4  →F 5 , etc. 
     Backcrossing can be used to improve an inbred line. Backcrossing transfers a specific desirable trait from one inbred or source to an inbred that lacks that trait. This can be accomplished for example by first crossing a superior inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate gene(s) for the trait in question. The progeny of this cross is then mated back to the superior recurrent parent (A) followed by selection in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny will be heterozygous for loci controlling the characteristic being transferred, but will be like the superior parent for most or almost all other genes. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure breeding progeny for the gene(s) being transferred. 
     A single cross hybrid corn variety is the cross of two inbred lines, each of which has a genotype which complements the genotype of the other. The hybrid progeny of the first generation is designated F 1 . In the development of hybrids only the F 1  hybrid plants are sought. Preferred F 1  hybrids are more vigorous than their inbred parents. This hybrid vigor, or heterosis, can be manifested in many polygenic traits, including increased vegetative growth and increased yield. 
     The development of a hybrid corn variety involves three steps: (1) the selection of plants from various germplasm pools; (2) the selfing of the selected plants for several generations to produce a series of inbred lines, which, although different from each other, each breed true and are highly uniform; and (3) crossing the selected inbred lines with unrelated inbred lines to produce the hybrid progeny (F 1 ). During the inbreeding process in corn, the vigor of the lines decreases. Vigor is restored when two unrelated inbred lines are crossed to produce the hybrid progeny (F 1 ). An important consequence of the homozygosity and homogeneity of the inbred lines is that the hybrid between any two inbreds will always be the same. Once the inbreds that give a superior hybrid have been identified, the hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long as the homogeneity of the inbred parents is maintained. 
     A single cross hybrid is produced when two inbred lines are crossed to produce the F 1  progeny. A double cross hybrid is produced from four inbred lines crossed in pairs (A×B and C×D) and then the two F 1  hybrids are crossed again (A×B)×(C×D). Much of the hybrid vigor exhibited by F 1  hybrids is lost in the next generation (F 2 ). Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock. 
     Corn is an important and valuable field crop. Thus, a continuing goal of plant breeders is to develop high-yielding corn hybrids that are agronomically sound based on stable inbred lines. The reasons for this goal are obvious: to maximize the amount of grain produced with the inputs used and minimize susceptibility to environmental stresses. To accomplish this goal, the corn breeder must select and develop superior inbred parental lines for producing hybrids. This requires identification and selection of genetically unique individuals which in a segregating population occur as the result of a combination of crossover events plus the independent assortment of specific combinations of alleles at many gene loci which results in specific genotypes. Based on the number of segregating genes, the frequency of occurrence of an individual with a specific genotype is less than 1 in 10,000. Thus, even if the entire genotype of the parents has been characterized and the desired genotype is known, only a few if any individuals having the desired genotype may be found in a large F 2  or S 0  population. Typically, however, the genotype of neither the parents nor the desired genotype is known in any detail. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     According to the invention, there is provided a novel inbred corn line, designated PHW06. This invention thus relates to the seeds of inbred corn line PHW06, to the plants of inbred corn line PHW06, and to methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred line PHW06 with itself or another corn line. This invention further relates to hybrid corn seeds and plants produced by crossing the inbred line PHW06 with another corn line or a related species. 
     DEFINITIONS 
     In the description and examples that follow, a number of terms are used herein. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are provided: 
     ABS=absolute measurement and % MN is percentage of mean of the experiments in which inbred or hybrid was grown unless otherwise defined. BAR PLT=BARREN PLANTS. This is the percent of plants per plot that were not barren (lack ears). 
     BRT STK=BRITTLE STALKS. This is a measure of the stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snap or break near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. 
     BU ACR=YIELD (BUSHELS/ACRE). Actual yield of the grain at harvest adjusted to 15.5% moisture. ABS is in absolute terms and % MN is percent of the mean for the experiments in which the inbred or hybrid was grown. 
     CLD TST=COLD TEST. This is the percentage of kernels that germinate under cold soil conditions. 
     COB SC=COB SCORE. The cob score is a rating of how well the grain is shelled off the cob and how badly the cob is broken up going through the combine. This is given as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being very good. A high score indicates that the grain shells off of the cob well, and the cob does not break. 
     DRP EAR=DROPPED EARS. This is a measure of the number of dropped ears per plot and represents the percentage of plants that did not drop ears prior to harvest. 
     EAR HT=EAR HEIGHT. The ear height is a measure from the ground to the top developed ear node attachment and is measured in inches. 
     EAR SZ=EAR SIZE. A 1 to 9 visual rating of ear size. The higher the rating the larger the ear size. 
     EST CNT=EARLY STAND COUNT. This is a measure of the stand establishment in the spring and represents the number of plants that emerge on a per plot basis for the inbred or hybrid. 
     GDU SHD=GDU TO SHED. The number of growing degree units (GDUs) or heat units required for an inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50 percent of the plants shedding pollen and is measured from the time of planting. Growing degree units are calculated by the Barger Method, where the heat units for a 24-hour period are: ##EQU1## 
     The highest maximum temperature used is 86° F and the lowest minimum temperature used is 50° F. For each inbred or hybrid it takes a certain number of GDUs to reach various stages of plant development. 
     GDU SLK=GDU TO SILK. The number of growing degree units required for an inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50 percent of the plants with silk emergence from time of planting. Growing degree units are calculated by the Barger Method as given in GDU SHD definition. 
     GRN QUL=GRAIN QUALITY. This is a 1 to 9 rating for the general quality of the shelled grain as it is harvested based on such factors as the color of the harvested grain, any mold on the grain, and any cracked grain. High scores indicate good grain quality. 
     MST=HARVEST MOISTURE. The moisture is the actual percentage moisture of the grain at harvest. 
     PLT HT=PLANT HEIGHT. This is a measure of the height of the plant from the ground to the tip of the tassel in inches. 
     POL SC=POLLEN SCORE. A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the amount of pollen shed. The higher the score the more pollen shed. 
     PRM=PREDICTED RM. This trait, predicted relative maturity (RM), is based on the harvest moisture of the grain. The relative maturity rating is based on a known set of checks and utilizes standard linear regression analyses and is referred to as the Minnesota Relative Maturity Rating System. 
     RT LDG=ROOT LODGING. Root lodging is the percentage of plants that do not root lodge; plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately 30° angle or greater would be counted as root lodged. 
     SCT GRN=SCATTER GRAIN. A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the amount of scatter grain (lack of pollination or kernel abortion) on the ear. The higher the score the less scatter grain. 
     SDG VGR=SEEDLING VIGOR. This is the visual rating (1 to 9) of the amount of vegetative growth after emergence at the seedling stage (approximately five leaves). A higher score indicates better vigor. 
     SEL IND=SELECTION INDEX. The selection index gives a single measure of the hybrid&#39;s worth based on information for up to five traits. A corn breeder may utilize his or her own set of traits for the selection index. One of the traits that is almost always included is yield. The selection index data presented in the tables represent the mean value averaged across testing stations. 
     STA GRN=STAY GREEN. Stay green is the measure of plant health near the time of black layer formation (physiological maturity). A high score indicates better late-season plant health. 
     STK CNT=NUMBER OF PLANTS. This is the final stand or number of plants per plot. 
     STK LDG=STALK LODGING. This is the percentage of plants that did not stalk lodge (stalk breakage) as measured by either natural lodging or pushing the stalks and determining the percentage of plants that break below the ear. 
     TAS BLS=TASSEL BLAST. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to measure the degree of blasting (necrosis due to heat stress) of the tassel at time of flowering. A 1 would indicate a very high level of blasting at time of flowering, while a 9 would have no tassel blasting. 
     TAS SZ=TASSEL SIZE. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to indicate the relative size of the tassel. The higher the rating the larger the tassel. 
     TAS WT=TASSEL WEIGHT. This is the average weight of a tassel (grams) just prior to pollen shed. 
     TEX EAR=EAR TEXTURE. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to indicate the relative hardness (smoothness of crown) of mature grain. A 1 would be very soft (extreme dent) while a 9 would be very hard (flinty or very smooth crown). 
     TILLER=TILLERS. A count of the number of tillers per plot that could possibly shed pollen was taken. Data is given as percentage of tillers: number of tillers per plot divided by number of plants per plot. 
     TST WT=TEST WEIGHT UNADJUSTED. The measure of the weight of the grain in pounds for a given volume (bushel). 
     TST WTA=TEST WEIGHT ADJUSTED. The measure of the weight of the grain in pounds for a given volume (bushel) adjusted for percent moisture. 
     YLD=YIELD. It is the same as BU ACR ABS. 
     YLD SC=YIELD SCORE. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to give a relative rating for yield based on plot ear piles. The higher the rating the greater visual yield appearance. 
     MDM CPX=Maize Dwarf Mosaic Complex (MDMV=Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus &amp; MCDV=Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Virus): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     COM SMT=Common Smut (Ustilago maydis): Percentage of plants that did not have infection. 
     SLF BLT=Southern Leaf Blight (Bipolaris maydis, Helminthosporium maydis): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     NLF BLT=Northern Leaf Blight (Exserohilum turcicum, H. turcicum): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     COM RST=Common Rust (Puccinia sorghi): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     EYE SPT=Eyespot (Kabatiella zeae): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     GLF SPT=Gray Leaf Spot (Cercospora zeae-maydis): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     STW WLT=Stewart&#39;s Wilt (Erwinia stewartii): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     HD SMT=Head Smut (Spacelotheca reiliana): Percentage of plants that did not have infection. 
     EAR MLD=General Ear Mold: Visual rating (1-9 score) where a &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. This is based on overall rating for ear mold of mature ears without determining specific mold organism, and may not be predictive for a specific ear mold. 
     ECB DPE=Dropped ears due to European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis): Percentage of plants that did not drop ears under second brood corn borer infestation. 
     ECB 2SC=European Corn Borer Second Brood (Ostrinia nubilalis): Visual rating (1-9 score) of post flowering damage due to infestation by European Corn Borer. A &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     ECB 1LF=European Corn Borer First Brood (Ostrinia nubilalis): Visual rating (1-9 score) of pre-flowering leaf feeding by European Corn Borer. A &#34;1&#34; is very susceptible and a &#34;9&#34; is very resistant. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     Inbred corn line PHW06 is a yellow, dent corn inbred that provides an acceptable male parental line in crosses for producing first generation F1 corn hybrids. PHW06 is best adapted to the eastern region of the United States and Canada. The inbred can be used to produce hybrids from approximately 81-93 relative maturity based on the Minnesota Relative Maturity Rating System for harvest moisture of grain. PHW06 has good stress tolerance and seed quality. It is highly resistant to common smut and is resistant to first brood European corn borer but is susceptible to the second brood. PHW06 is a good combiner and yields well in hybrid combination. 
     The inbred has shown uniformity and stability within the limits of environmental influence for all the traits as described in the Variety Description Information (Table 1) that follows. Most of the data in the Variety Description Information was collected at Johnston, Iowa. The inbred has been self-pollinated and ear-rowed a sufficient number of generations with careful attention paid to uniformity of plant type to ensure homozygousity and phenotypic stability. The line has been increased both by hand and in isolated fields with continued observation for uniformity. No variant traits have been observed or are expected in PHW06. 
     Inbred corn line PHW06, being substantially homozygous, can be reproduced by planting seeds of the line, growing the resulting corn plants under self-pollinating or sib-pollinating conditions with adequate isolations, and harvesting the resulting seed, using techniques familiar to the agricultural arts. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATIONINBRED = PHW06Type: DENT      Region Best Adapted: East______________________________________A.  Maturity: Average across maturity zones. Zone: 0    Heat Unit Shed: 1230    Heat Unit Silk: 1290 No. Reps: 35 ##STR1##*If maximum is greater than 86 degrees fahrenheit, then86 is used and if minimum is less than 50, then 50 isused. Heat units accumulated daily and can not be lessthan 0.B.  Plant Characteristics:    Plant height (to tassel tip): 131 cm    Length of top ear internode: 15 cm    Number of ears per stalk: Single    Ear height (to base of top ear): 45 cm    Number of tillers: None    Cytoplasm type: NormalC.  Leaf:    Angle from Stalk: 30-60 degrees    Marginal Waves: Few    Number of Leaves (mature plants): 14    Length (Ear node leaf): 71 cm    Width (widest point, ear node leaf): 6 cmD.  Tassel:    Number lateral branches: 9    Branch Angle from central spike: 30-40 degrees    Pollen Shed: Light based on Pollen Yield Test    (71% of experiment means)    Peduncle Length (top leaf to basal branches): 8 cm    Anther Color: Pink    Glume Color: GreenE.  Ear (Husked Ear Data Except When Stated Otherwise):    Length: 13 cm    Weight: 36 gm    Mid-point Diameter: 35 mm    Husk Extension (Harvest stage): Long    Taper of Ear: Average    Position of Shank (dry husks): Upright    Kernel Rows: Number = 14    Husk Color (fresh): Light green    Husk Color (dry): Buff    Shank Length: 7 cm    Shank (No. of internodes): 6F.  Kernel (Dried):    Size (from ear mid-point)    Length: 9 mm    Width: 8 mm    Thick: 5 mm    Shape Grade (% rounds): 20-40 (29% medium round based    on Parent Test Data)    Pericarp Color: Colorless    Aleurone Color: Homozygous Yellow    Endosperm Color: Yellow    Endosperm Type: Normal Starch    Gm Wt/100 Seeds (unsized): 22 gmG.  Cob:    Diameter at mid-point: 23 mm    Strength: strong    Color: WhiteH.  Diseases:    Corn Lethal Necrosis (MCMV = Maize Chlorotic Mottle    Virus and MDMV = Maize Dwarf Mosaic    Virus): Susceptible    N. Leaf Blight (H. turcicum): Susceptible    Carbonum Leaf Blight (H. carbonum): Susceptible    Eye Spot (K. zeae): Susceptible    Gray Leaf Spot (C. zeae): Susceptible    Stewart&#39;s Wilt (E.stewartii): Susceptible    Goss&#39;s Wilt (C. nebraskense): Susceptible    Common Smut (U. maydis): Highly Resistant    Head Smut (S. reiliana): Intermediate    Fusarium Ear Mold (F. moniliforme): ResistantI.  Insects:    European Corn Borer-1 Leaf Damage (Pre-flowering):    Resistant    European Corn Borer-2 (Post-flowering): Susceptible    The above descriptions are based on a scale of 1-9, 1 being    highly susceptible, 9 being highly resistant.    S (Susceptible): Would generally represent a score of 1-3.    I (Intermediate): Would generally represent a scote of 4-5.    R (Resistant): Would generally represent a score of 6-7.    H (Highly Resistant): Would generally represent a score of    8-9. Highly resistant does not imply    the inbred is immune.J.  Variety Most Closely Resembling:  Character      Inbred  Maturity       PHR25  Usage          PHR25______________________________________ 
    
     Data for Items B, C, D, E, F, and G is based primarily on a maximum of three reps from Cornene, France grown in 1988 and Chile in 1989, plus description information from the maintaining station. 
     ELECTROPHORESIS RESULTS 
     Isozyme Genotypes for PHW06 
     Isozyme data were generated for inbred corn line PHW06 according to the procedures described in Stuber, C. W., Wendel, J. F., Goodman, M. M., and Smith, J. S. C., &#34;Techniques and Scoring Procedures for Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Enzymes from Maize (Zea mays L.)&#34;, Technical Bulletin No. 286, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C. (1988). 
     The data in Table 2 compares PHW06 with its parents PH207 and PHG36. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________ELECTROPHORESIS RESULTS FOR PHW06AND ITS PARENTS PH207 AND PHG36            PARENTSLoci     PHW06         PH207   PHG36______________________________________ACP1     2             2       4ADH1     4             4       4CAT3     9             9       9DIA1     8             8       8GOT1     4             4       4GOT2     4             4       4GOT3     4             4       4IDH1     4             4       4IDH2     6             6       6MDH1     6             6       6MDH2     3.5           3.5     3.5MDH3     16            16      16MDH4     12            12      12MDH5     12            12      12MMM      4             4       4PGM1     9             9       9PGM2     4             4       8PGD1     3.8           3.8     3.8PGD2     5             5       5PHI1     4             4       4______________________________________ 
    
     INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY 
     This invention also is directed to methods for producing a corn plant by crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant wherein the first or second parent corn plant is an inbred corn plant from the line PHW06. Further, both first and second parent corn plants can come from the inbred corn line PHW06. Thus, any such methods using the inbred corn line PHW06 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid production, crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced using inbred corn line PHW06 as a parent are within the scope of this invention. Advantageously, the inbred corn line is used in crosses with other, different, corn inbreds to produce first generation (F 1 ) corn hybrid seeds and plants with superior characteristics. 
     As used herein, the terms &#34;plant and plant parts&#34; include plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell tissue culture from which corn plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, leaves, husks, stalks, roots, root tips, anthers, silk and the like. 
     Tissue culture of corn is described in European Patent Application, publication 160,390, incorporated herein by reference. Corn tissue culture procedures are also described in Green and Rhodes, &#34;Plant Regeneration in Tissue Culture of Maize,&#34; Maize for Biological Research (Plant Molecular Biology Association, Charlottsville, Va. 1982, at 367-372). Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide cells which upon growth and differentiation produce the inbred line PHW06. 
     The utility of inbred line PHW06 also extends to crosses with other species. Commonly, suitable species will be of the family Graminaceae, and especially of the genera Zea, Tripsacum, Coix, Schlerachne, Polytoca, Chionachne, and Trilobachne, of the tribe Maydeae. Of these, Zea and Tripsacum, are most preferred. Potentially suitable for crosses with PHW06 may be the various varieties of grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. 
     Corn is used as human food, livestock feed, and as raw material in industry. The food uses of corn, in addition to human consumption of corn kernels, include both products of dry- and wet-milling industries. The principal products of corn dry milling are grits, meal and flour. The corn wet-milling industry can provide corn starch, corn syrups, and dextrose for food use. Corn oil is recovered from corn germ, which is a by-product of both dry- and wet-milling industries. 
     Corn, including both grain and non-grain portions of the plant, is also used extensively as livestock feed, primarily for beef cattle, dairy cattle, hogs, and poultry. 
     Industrial uses of corn are mainly from corn starch from the wet-milling industry and corn flour from the dry-milling industry. The industrial applications of corn starch and flour are based on functional properties, such as viscosity, film formation, adhesive properties, and ability to suspend particles. The corn starch and flour have application in the paper and textile industries. Other industrial uses include applications in adhesives, building materials, foundry binders, laundry starches, explosives, oil-well muds, and other mining applications. 
     Plant parts other than the grain of corn are also used in industry. Stalks and husks are made into paper and wallboard and cobs are used for fuel and to make charcoal. 
     The seed of inbred corn line PHW06, the plant produced from the inbred seed, the hybrid corn plant produced from the crossing of the inbred, hybrid seed, and various parts of the hybrid corn plant can be utilized for human food, livestock feed, and as a raw material in industry. 
    
    
     EXAMPLE 
     INBRED AND HYBRID PERFORMANCE OF PHW06 
     In the examples that follow the traits and characteristics of inbred corn line PHW06 are given as a line and in hybrid combination. The data collected on inbred corn line PHW06 is presented for the key characteristics and traits. 
     The results in Table 3A compare PHW06 with its PH207 parent. The results show that PHW06 has lower yield, higher test weight, and less grain moistures at maturity than PH207. PHW06 is shorter with lower ear placement and flowers (GDU SHD and GDU SLK) earlier than PH207. PHW06 has lower pollen yield and a smaller tassel than PH207. Ear texture is better for PHW06 and it has better grain quality than PH207. Stalk lodging, head smut, and first brood European corn borer resistance is similar for the two lines but PHW06 is more susceptible to root lodging, ear mold, and second brood European corn borer. 
     The results in Table 3B show PHW06 is taller with higher ear placement and flowers (GDU SHD and GDU SLK) later than its PHG36 parent. PHW06 has better ear texture and scatter grain score than PHG36. Ear mold and first brood European corn borer resistance is better for PHW06 than PHG36. 
     Table 3C shows PHW06 has lower yield, higher test weight, and higher grain moisture at maturity than PHR25. PHW06 is slightly shorter, sheds pollen (GDU SHD) earlier but silks (GDU SLK) later than PHR25. PHW06 has better seedling vigor and early stand count compared to PHR25. PHW06 yields less pollen and has a smaller tassel than PHR25. PHW06 has similar stalks but better roots and is more resistant to ear mold, head smut, and first and second brood European corn borer than PHR25. 
     Table 3D compares PHW06 to PHJ75. The results show that PHW06 yields less, has higher test weight, and contains less grain harvest moisture than PHJ75. PHW06 is a shorter inbred with lower ear placement and flowers (GDU SHD and GDU SLK) earlier than PHJ75. The pollen yield of PHW06 is less and its tassel is smaller compared to PHJ75. PHW06 has better ear texture and grain quality than PHJ75. PHW06 has better first brood European corn borer resistance but is more susceptible to root lodging and head smut than PHJ75. 
     The results in Table 4A compare PHW06 to PHR25 crossed to the same inbred testers. The hybrids have similar yield and grain moisture at maturity but PHW06 hybrids have higher test weight than PHR25 hybrids. PHW06 hybrids are taller than the PHR25 hybrids and they flower (GDU SHD) at approximately the same time. The PHW06 hybrids have better stay green, cob score, and grain quality than PHR25 hybrids. The hybrids have similar stalks but the PHW06 hybrids have better roots than the PHR25 hybrids. 
     Results in Table 4B which compare PHW06 to PHJ75 crossed to the same inbred testers show PHW06 hybrids yield less and have similar test weight and grain harvest moisture compared to PHJ75 hybrids. The PHW06 hybrids are taller with higher ear placement and flower (GDU SHD) later than the PHJ75 hybrids. PHW06 hybrids have better cob scores and their grain quality is better than PHJ75 hybrids. The PHW06 hybrids have slightly better stalks but are more prone to root lodging than the PHJ75 hybrids. 
     
                                           TABLE 3A__________________________________________________________________________PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA__________________________________________________________________________REGION    BU  BU  YLD     EAR BAR PLT EAR SDG EST DRP TIL                                              GDU GDU POLVAR ACR ACR SC  MST SZ  PLT HT  HT  VGR CNT EAR LER                                              SHD SLK SC#   ABS % MN       ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS                                              ABS ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   46.8   82  3.6 19.3               3.7 83.8                       74.4                           25.6                               5.7 32.3                                       100.0                                           5.6                                              118.8                                                  125.4                                                      4.32   63.1   112 6.0 24.8               5.7 87.3                       76.8                           30.7                               5.3 33.9                                       99.5                                           7.6                                              130.9                                                  135.3                                                      7.2LOCS    6   6   8   6   10  9   17  16  19  26  2   16 27  26  6DIFF    16.3   30  2.4 5.5 2.0 3.5 2.4 5.1 0.3 1.6 0.5 2.0                                              12.1                                                  9.9 2.4PROB    .047+   .056*       .003#           .001#               .001#                   .287                       .165                           .004#                               .453                                   .289                                       .500                                           .409                                              .000#                                                  .000#                                                      .002#__________________________________________________________________________REGION    TAS TEX TST  GRN SCT STA STK  RT  BRT EAR  HD  NLF ECB ECBVAR SZ  EAR WT   QUL GRN GRN LDG  LDG STK MLD  SMT BLT 1LF 2SC#   ABS ABS ABS  ABS ABS ABS ABS  ABS ABS ABS  ABS ABS ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   4.2 6.0 58.6 6.1 6.5 5.2 98.3 95.2                                 100.0                                     5.8  94.7                                              2.0 6.3 3.82   7.2 4.8 54.2 4.8 7.3 7.2 98.0 98.7                                 99.0                                     6.5  94.8                                              4.0 6.5 5.0LOCS    19  12  6    5   12  3   4    7   1   14   4   1   8   4DIFF    3.1 1.3 4.4  1.3 0.8 2.0 0.3  3.5 1.0 0.7  0.1 2.0 0.3 1.3PROB    .000#   .002#       .001#            .251                .202                    .184                        .809 .452    .298 .391    .516                                                      .546__________________________________________________________________________ VARIETY #1  PHW06 VARIETY #2  PH207 * = 10% SIG + = 5% SIG # = 1% SIG 
    
     
                                           TABLE 3B__________________________________________________________________________PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATAREGION    EAR  BAR PLT EAR   SDG EST TIL                           GDU    GDU   TAS                                           TEX                                              SCT  EAR ECBVAR SZ PLT HT  HT    VGR CNT LER                           SHD    SLK   SZ EAR                                              GRN  MLD 1LF#   ABS  ABS ABS ABS   ABS ABS ABS                           ABS    ABS   ABS                                           ABS                                              ABS  ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   5.0  100.0      84.0          30.0  7.0 24.7                        0.0                           114.7  121.3 4.7                                           6.0                                              6.0  6.5 6.02   6.0  95.2      69.0          24.0  7.0 29.7                        0.0                           106.0  110.3 3.7                                           3.0                                              5.0  4.5 5.0LOCS    1  2   2   2     1   3   3  3      3     3  1  1    2   1DIFF    1.0  4.8 15.0          6.0   0.0 5.0 0.0                           8.7    11.0  1.0                                           3.0                                              1.0  2.0 1.0PROB   .500      .126          .001#     .102                        1.00                           .001#  .041+ .423       .626__________________________________________________________________________ VARIETY #1  PHW06 VARIETY #2  PHG36 * = 10% SIG + = 5% SIG # = 1% SIG 
    
     
                                           TABLE 3C__________________________________________________________________________PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA__________________________________________________________________________REGION    BU  BU  YLD     EAR BAR PLT EAR SDG EST DRP TIL GDU GDU POLVAR ACR ACR SC  MST SZ  PLT HT  HT  VGR CNT EAR LER SHD SLK SC#   ABS % MN       ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   40.6   80  3.6 20.4               3.8 83.8                       72.0                           24.3                               5.9 33.9                                       100.0                                           5.9 118.2                                                   125.5                                                       4.02   52.9   104 4.3 21.2               4.9 86.5                       73.9                           26.9                               4.6 30.6                                       100.0                                           1.3 122.6                                                   123.9                                                       5.0LOCS    6   6   7   6   9   9   18  17  23  28  3   19  29  27  8DIFF    12.3   25  0.7 0.8 1.1 2.7 1.9 2.6 1.3 3.3 0.0 4.7 4.4 1.6 1.0PROB    .043+   .045+       .182           .569               .062*                   .440                       .402                           .043+                               .001#                                   .013+                                       1.00                                           0.13+                                               .001#                                                   .172                                                       .068*__________________________________________________________________________REGION    TAS TEX TST GRN SCT STA STK RT  BRT EAR GLF HD  NLF ECB ECBVAR SZ  EAR WT  QUL GRN GRN LDG LDG STK MLD SPT SMT BLT 1LF 2SC#   ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   4.1 6.0 57.1           5.5 6.2 4.0 98.6                           95.2                               100.0                                   6.0 1.0 94.7                                               2.0 6.2 4.02   5.5 3.3 54.4           3.7 6.2 2.6 98.6                           87.1                               100.0                                   5.1 1.0 88.7                                               3.0 4.8 2.7LOCS    21  11  6   5   12  4   5   7   1   13  1   4   1   9   3DIFF    1.4 2.7 2.7 1.8 0.0 1.4 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 6.0 1.0 1.4 1.3PROB    .001#   .000#       .197           .006#               .000                   .115                       .976                           .323    .097*   .323    .089*                                                       .635__________________________________________________________________________ VARIETY #1  PHW06 VARIETY #2  PHR25 * = 10% SIG + = 5% SIG # = 1% SIG 
    
     
                                           TABLE 3D__________________________________________________________________________PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA__________________________________________________________________________REGION    BU  BU  YLD     EAR BAR PLT EAR SDG EST DRP TIL GDU GDU POLVAR ACR ACR SC  MST SZ  PLT HT  HT  VGR CNT EAR LER SHD SLK SC#   ABS % MN       ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   40.6   80  3.4 20.4               3.5 81.8                       72.6                           24.5                               5.8 34.5                                       100.0                                           5.5 118.3                                                   125.4                                                       3.92   43.8   87  4.5 23.9               5.0 85.2                       74.2                           26.5                               4.2 29.8                                       100.0                                           8.4 121.4                                                   125.6                                                       5.0LOCS    6   6   10  6   10  8   17  16  20  28  3   18  30  28  7DIFF    3.2 7   1.1 3.5 1.5 3.4 1.6 2.0 1.6 4.8 0.0 2.9 3.2 0.3 1.1PROB    .494   .443       .012+           .023+               .003#                   .435                       .451                           .160                               .000#                                   .003#                                       1.00                                           .541                                               .002#                                                   .788                                                       .066*__________________________________________________________________________REGION    TAS TEX TST GRN SCT STA STK RT  BRT COM EAR HD  NLF ECB ECBVAR SZ  EAR WT  QUL GRN GRN LDG LDG STK RST MLD SMT BLT 1LF 2SC#   ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS__________________________________________________________________________YEARTOTAL SUM1   4.1 5.9 57.1           5.5 6.1 3.6 98.6                           95.2                               100.0                                   6.0 6.0 95.8                                               2.0 6.4 4.32   5.3 4.8 53.0           4.0 6.5 4.8 98.7                           97.6                               99.0                                   6.0 5.7 100.0                                               3.0 5.1 2.7LOCS    21  11  6   5   13  5   5   7   1   1   15  5   1   9   3DIFF    1.2 1.1 4.1 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.0 2.4 1.0 0.0 0.3 4.2 1.0 1.3 1.7PROB    .001#   .019+       .038+           .040+               .273                   .440                       .991                           .689        .719                                           .374    .022+                                                       .549__________________________________________________________________________ VARIETY #1  PHW06 VARIETY #2  PHJ75 * = 10% SIG + = 5% SIG # = 1% SIG 
    
     
                                           TABLE 4A__________________________________________________________________________AVERAGE INBRED BY TESTER PERFORMANCE COMPARING PHW06 TO PHR25CROSSED TO THE SAME INBRED TESTERS AND GROWN IN THE SAME EXPERI-MENTS. ALL VALUES ARE EXPRESSED AS PERCENT OF THE EXPERIMENT MEANEXCEPT PREDICTED RM, SELECTION INDEX, AND YIELD (BU/AC).__________________________________________________________________________            SEL               BU       GDU PRM STK RT  BAR  INBRED        PRM IND               ACR                  YLD                     MST                        SHD SHD LDG LDG PLT__________________________________________________________________________TOTAL  REPLIC.        49  46  55                   55                      58                         27 56   52 17   24MEAN WTS  PHW06 93  100               108                  100                     101                        101 91  104 98  101MEAN WTS  PHR25 93  99 110                  101                     102                        101 89  103 89  100  DIFF.      1  2  1  1  0   2   1   9   1__________________________________________________________________________        STA TST COB                   GRN SDG EST                              STK                                 PLT EAR                                        DRP  INBRED        GRN WTA SC QUL VGR CNT                              CNT                                 HT  HT EAR__________________________________________________________________________TOTAL  REPLIC.        34  58   13                   55  51  48 64  41  41                                         45MEAN WTS  PHW06 102 101 121                   106 93  100                              101                                 104 102                                        100MEAN WTS  PHR25 90  99  103                   88  93  95 98 101 100                                        100  DIFF. 12   2   18                   18   0   0  3  3   2  0__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     
                                           TABLE 4B__________________________________________________________________________AVERAGE INBRED BY TESTER PERFORMANCE COMPARING PHW06 TO PHJ75CROSSED TO THE SAME INBRED TESTERS AND GROWN IN THE SAME EXPERI-MENTS. ALL VALUES ARE EXPRESSED AS PERCENT OF THE EXPERIMENT MEANEXCEPT PREDICTED RM, SELECTION INDEX, AND YIELD (BU/AC).__________________________________________________________________________            SEL               BU       GDU PRM STK RT  BAR  INBRED        PRM IND               ACR                  YLD                     MST                        SHD SHD LDG LDG PLT__________________________________________________________________________TOTAL  REPLIC.        17  17  17                  17 17 6   21  15  7   10MEAN WTS  PHW06 88  99 114                  99 98 102 90  101 99  99MEAN WTS  PHJ75 88  104               118                  103                     99 99  85  97  106 101  DIFF.      5  5  4  1 4    5   3  7    2__________________________________________________________________________        STA TST COB                   GRN SDG EST                              STK                                 PLT EAR                                        DRP  INBRED        GRN WTA SC QUL VGR CNT                              CNT                                 HT  HT EAR__________________________________________________________________________TOTAL  REPLIC.        14   17  4 17  17   17                               21                                  11 11  15MEAN WTS  PHW06 99  100 113                   105 85  102                              101                                 106 104                                        100MEAN WTS  PHJ75 124 100 88 97  101 103                              101                                 102 99 100  DIFF. 25   1  25  8  16   2  0  4   5  0__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     Deposits 
     Applicant has made a deposit of at least 2500 seeds of Inbred Corn Line PHW06 with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, Md. 20852 USA, ATCC Deposit No. 97219. The seeds deposited with the ATCC on Jul. 11, 1995 were taken from the deposit maintained by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 700 Capital Square, 400 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2340 since prior to the filing date of this application. This deposit of the Inbred Corn Line PHW06 will be maintained in the ATCC depository, which is a public depository, for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the most recent request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced if it becomes nonviable during that period. Additionally, Applicant has satisfied all the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §§1.801-1.809, including providing an indication of the viability of the sample. Applicant imposes no restrictions on the availability of the deposited material from the ATCC; however, Applicant has no authority to waive any restrictions imposed by law on the transfer of biological material or its transportation in commerce. Applicant does not waive any infringement of its rights granted under this patent or under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 USC 2321 et seq.). PHW06 is a U.S. Protected Variety under Plant Variety Protection Certificate No. 9000253.