Abstract:
Compositions based on blends of certain specified poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymers and other poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers are described which are useful as sizes, and have improved ability to be desized from fabrics compared with the other poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers alone. The specific poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymers useful in the blends with other poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers are copolymers having a high level of acrylic ester comonomer. The blend sizes are useful in producing woven materials since they are excellent sizes, and are uniquely adaptable to caustic desizing.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention relates to compositions useful for textile sizes, based on blends of particular poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymers with other poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers, and to the process of weaving textile fabrics which employs the compositions as sizes and utilizes their ready ability to be desized. The sizes are based on copolymers having a high level of acrylic ester comonomer, blended with other poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers. Desizing involves use of caustic solutions and is ideally suited to such compositions. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Poly(vinyl alcohol) hornpolymers, and certain poly(vinyl aloohol) copolymers have been known for use as textile sizes for many years. For convenience, both will be genetically referred to hereinafter as PVA(s) or PVA polymers. When specificity requires they will be referred to as PVA homopolymers or homopolymer PVA and PVA copolymers or copolymer PVA. By convention, homopolymer PVA includes PVA derived from homopolymer poly(vinyl acetate) which has been only partially hydrolysed as well as that which has been `fully` (&gt;98%) hydrolysed. The terms `fully hydrolysed PVA homopolymer` and `partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer` will be used when distinction is necessary. It is also possible to have fully or partially hydrolysed PVA copolymers though most copolymers are fully hydrolysed. 
     These different PVAs differ quite significantly in properties as textile sizes and in the ability of fabrics sized with them to be desized. This difference primarily depends on the degree of hydrolysis and the eomonomer content, but also on other factors including molecular weight and thermal history. 
     PVAs are commonly prepared by alcoholysis of the corresponding poly(vinyl acetate) homopolymer or copolymer. The process is often (though not strictly correctly) referred to as hydrolysis; hence the term `partially hydrolyzed` when not all the acetate groups are completely converted to alcohol groups. When homopolymer poly(vinyl acetate) is only partially hydrolysed, the resulting PVA is really a vinyl alcohol/vinyl acetate copolymer. However, as noted, such polymers are generally referred to as PVA homopolymers. The term copolymer in this regard is reserved for materials which result from hydrolysis of the corresponding vinyl acetate copolymer, i.e. polymer also containing traits derived from a monomer other than vinyl acetate. 
     Fully hydrolysed PVA homopolymer is highly crystalline, and strong, but because of its high crystallinity it dissolves only in hot, not cold water. Furthermore, when it is subjected to high temperatures, it can develop even higher levels of crystallinity than as prepared, resulting in polymer which is even more difficult to dissolve. Finishing mills with certain fabrics, particularly blend fabrics, tend to use a heat setting condition to relieve fiber stress. The treatment is typically carded out at temperatures which develop further crystallinity in fully hydrolysed PVA homopolymer, so that when such polymer is used as size on fabric, the treatment causes an increase in its crystallinity and a decrease in ease of subsequent desizing. 
     PVA copolymers and partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymers are less crystalline, and dissolve at lower temperatures, or more rapidly at a given temperature. As a result they desize in water more readily, and are less subject to change in crystallinity and ability to be desized with fabric heat-setting treatments. For a given level of comohomer or residual unhydrolyzed acetate units however, the two types of PVAs are not identical in several respects. This is partly because the distribution of comohomer units (or units derived from them by lactonization, as discussed below) along the polymer chain is not the same as the distribution of residual acetate units along the chain after partial hydrolysis. One difference, for instance, is that acetate units tend to be blocky, and blockiness of partially hydrolysed PVA causes more surfactant behavior and more foaming when used as size. 
     Various PVA copolymers have been disclosed as being useful for textile sizes. U.S. Pat. No. 3,689,469 (Inskip et al.) discloses PVA copolymers with 2 to 6.5 weight percent methyl methacrylate as comohomer which are useful as textile sizes, and compares their properties as sizes with fully hydrolysed and partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer. The disclosure also indicates however, that above about 6 weight percent methyl methacrylate such copolymers are excessively water soluble. 
     PVA copolymers containing 1 to 10 mole percent methyl acrylate or methyl methacrylate as comohomer are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4, 990,335 (Bateman et al.). (For methyl aerylate this corresponds to about 2 to 16 weight percent methyl acrylate in the polymer, calculated as non-lactonized vinyl alcohol copolymer). The polymers are disclosed as being useful for certain tableting applications. There is no suggestion for use of such polymers as a textile size. 
     Japanese Patent No. 75-32355 discloses modified poly(vinyl alcohol) polymer fiber sizing agents containing 0.1 to 15 mole % lactone rings. In an example, cotton fabric sized with a 4.7 mole % lactone polymer prepared by saponifying (hydrolyzing) a poly(vinyl acetate/methyl acrylate) copolymer with 4.5% methyl acrylate (which corresponds to 4.7 mole% lactone when the comonomer is fully lactonized, and to about 8.1 weight percent methyl acrylate calculated as non-lactonized vinyl alcohol copolymer) had better scouring fasmess than homopolymer PVA. 
     Desizing usually involves water washing. However alesizing of particular polymers with caustic solution is sometimes used and has been described. U.S. Pat. No. 4,0 13,805 (Corey et al.) discloses a poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer which contains a comonomer with free carboxylic acid groups derived from a monomer such as acrylic acid, which can be desized with aqueous base. The poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer is not hydrolysed to the corresponding poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer. 
     Desizing of wax-free PVA polymer or copolymer sizes, where the copolymer may contain up to 6 weight percent methyl methacrylate or other comonomers, and wherein the size contains an alcohol ethoxyl ate surfac tant, using an alkaline scour bath followed by hot water rinses, is disclosed as being easy compared with comparable sizes with wax but no surfactant, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,640,946 (Vassallo et al.). 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4, 172,930 (Kajitani et al.) discloses a PVA copolymer as textile size where the comonomer is 0.1-10 mole percent of a diacid such as maleic and fumaric acids, but having no monoester, diester or anhydride of the aliacid. Copolymers containing free acid can be extremely water sensitive. 
     Solubility and dissolution times of various types of PVA in water and caustic solutions are discussed in `Polyvinyl Alcohol`, John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., 1992, Chapter 11, p 365-368. It is noted there that partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer dissolves more slowly in caustic solutions than in water, whereas PVA copolymers with methyl methacrylate as comonomer dissolve more rapidly in caustic than in water. This is explained by the fact that caustic further hydrolyses partially hydrolysed PVA to homopolymer, whereas with the copolymer, lactone rings known to be present are sap onified, resulting in ionic groups which are highly soluble. The methyl methacrylate copolymers discussed were designated T-25 and T-66. The amounts of methyl methacryate in those copolymers were not disclosed. Those polymers are manufactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours. They both contain less than 6.5 weight percent methyl methacrylate, calculated on the basis of non-lactonized poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer. 
     The whole chapter in the above reference provides a general background to use of PVA copolymers and other materials in sizing applications. Many other materials are known for use as textile sizes. Unmodified starches are inexpensive, but they do not generally have as good properties as PVAs, often flaking off the yam when used as sizes. They do not give stable solutions, and often desizing requires use of enzymes. Many modified starches are known which are improvements in various ways over simple starches, but may be considerably more expensive. Polyacrylic sizes are also known and have good properties, but are extremely water sensitive. Known PVA based sizes may be considered to have, very generally, sizing properties intermediate between starches and polyacrylic sizes. 
     Blending different sizing materials is known and used. Blending can provide properties of the size itself, and economics, intermediate between those of the components. Heretofore however, PVA copolymers containing above 6.5 weight percent ester comohomer have not been considered as components of blend sizes. Nor has blending as a means of enhancing ability to be desized heretofore been considered. 
     Ease of desizing can strongly affect the economics of the weaving process. While many sizing materials are known, each having its particular niche, there remains a need for size materials which are very readily alesized, and which have acceptable mechanical properties, and give stable size solutions, yet which have acceptable water insensitivity. There also remains a need for a size material which can be used to upgrade various size properties, but particularly to upgrade the ability to be desized, by utilization of such a material in blends with known PVA size materials. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     The invention concerns improved sizing compositions which are blends of PVA copolymers containing a very high level of an ester comonomer and other PVA size materials. The blends are effective sizes. They are used as aqueous solutions. Fabrics sized with these blends are able to be very effectively desized compared with the other size materials alone. 
     More particularly, the present invention provides a sizing composition which is an aqueous solution of a blend poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers, comprising; 
     a) from 10 to 90 parts of a first poly(vinyl alcohol) polymer which is a poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer containing from about 7 to 15 weight percent units derived from an alkyl acrylate or methacrylate or a dialkyl fumarate or maleate, wherein the alkyl group contains from 1 to 8 carbon atom, and 
     b) from 90 to 10 parts of a second poly(vinyl alcohol) polymer which is a poly(vinyl alcohol) homopolymer, or a poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer containing less than 7 weight percent units derived from an alkyl acrylate or methacrylate, or dialkyl fumarate or maleate, wherein the alkyl group contains from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, or blend of such second poly(vinyl alcohol) polymers. 
     The invention further provides a process to produce woven textile materials where yam is sized with the above blended size materials, and after weaving, the size is removed from the woven textile fabric with a dilute caustic solution, and optionally, the caustic desized fabric is further washed with water. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     In this disclosure, it should be understood that the use of the term comonomer, when referring to PVA copolymers, as used here and as conventionally used, refers to the comonomer copolymerized in the poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer before the latter is converted to a PVA by alcoholysis. In PVA copolymers, ester comonomer units are subject to reactions with a hydroxyl from an adjacent vinyl alcohol unit to form lactones, and free alcohol from the ester unit. Thus the original ester monomer unit may no longer exist as the same entity as was present in the precursor poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer. Almost complete lactonization may occur, though the extent may vary with different comonomers. The use of phrases such as PVA copolymers `with` or `containing` a given comonomer and the like should be understood in this context. 
     PVA copolymers containing up to 15 mole % lactone rings have been disclosed generally as sizing materials. Commercially, PVA copolymers containing up to about 5 weight percent methyl methacrylate have actually been used for textile size compositions. About 6 weight percent methyl methacrylate has been considered the useful upper limit, since, as noted above, higher levels were considered to make the polymers highly water sensitive. 
     Surprisingly, PVA copolymers with comonomer levels even above 7 weight percent of certain acrylate, methacrylate and certain other comonomers are suitable as textile sizes. This is because they have a major advantage over previous sizing compositions in that they have now been forrod to be particularly easy to desize if, instead of the usual water as desizer, dilute caustic solutions are used. In addition, presumably because such copolymers have low crystallinity and crystallize less readily, the ability to desize using caustic solutions is far less affected by heat treatment than for copolymers containing less ester comohomer. 
     The chemical nature and solubility characteristics in water and caustic solutions of PVA copolymers containing an ester comonomer has been recognized in a general qualitative way. Heretofore however, it had not been recognized that a major divergence in solubility characteristics between water and caustic solubility occurs when high ester comohomer levels are present, i.e., above about 6 %). More importantly, it had not been recognized that such a divergence presents an ideal situation for utilization of such copolymers as sizes, either alone, but particularly in blends with other size materials, because such copolymers are amenable to easy desizing using caustic solutions. 
     Sizes based on blends of such high ester PVA copolymers with most PVA polymers previously used as size materials are more readily desized than such PVA polymers alone. Utilization of these high ester PVA copolymers alone is the subject of a copending patent application. 
     In general, PVA copolymers have good mechanical properties as sizes. When in addition, the desizing advantage of high ester comohomer copolymers is taken into account, they have a place as size materials and as blending materials to aid in desizing. Thus they are also useful as sizes when blended with other PVA polymer size materials or when blended with starches. They can contribute both to the properties of the blend size and to the overall ease of desizing provided caustic desizing is used. In blend compositions tested, it has been found that the ease of desizing with caustic solutions is, very approximately, a weighted average of the ability to desize the blend components, rather than being limited by the least readily desized component. This means that if a particular quality of a size material is desired-a particular property, or low cost for instance-in a size material that is difficult to desize, then a blend with high ester comohomer containing PVA copolymer may offer an ideal compromise between properties and ability to desize. 
     PVA copolymers with acrylate and methacrylate comonomers can be prepared by well known methods which involve preparation of the corresponding poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer, followed by saponification, alcoholysis or `hydrolysis`. Typical preparation of such poly(vinyl acetate) copolymers and their hydrolysis is given in U.S. Pat. No. 3,689,469 which describes laboratory scale preparations, and U.S.4,900,335 which describes a continuous process for such polymerizations, and particularly for high ester containing PVA copolymers. The amounts of monomer are adjusted for different levels required in the polymer, and for their different reactivities. These two patents are hereby incorporated by reference. 
     Methacrylates are more reactive than acrylates, but both are far more reactive than vinyl acetate, so that typically they are completely reacted, while less reactive vinyl acetate has to be stripped off, and would be recycled in a commercial continuous process. Dialkyl maleates are considerably less reactive. 
     Suitable comohomers in the high ester comonomer PVA copolymers useful as blend copolymers in this invention are esters of unsaturated monocarboxylic acids and diesters of unsaturated dicarboxylic acids. Free carboxylic acid should not be present in the copolymers. Examples include alkyl acrylates, methacrylates, dialkyl fumarates and maleates having an alkyl group or groups containing 1 to 8 carbon atoms. Comohomer level can be from 7 to 15 weight percent calculated on the basis of non-lactonized poly(vinyl alcohol/ester) copolymers. As noted, after alcoholysis, during neutralization of the alkaline catalyst with acid, the comohomer ester group and adjacent vinyl alcohol hyroxyl groups are believed to be largely converted to lactone tings, with release of the ester alcohol. There is thus a loss of weight due to the loss of ester alcohol, but the units which are not vinyl alcohol units are lactone units, and will comprise a higher weight percent of the polymer than that of the comohomer, since an adjacent alcohol unit is involved in the lactone unit, which then has two chain carbon atoms. 
     To obtain above 15 weight percent ester in the poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer, calculated on a non-lactonized basis, requires a poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer precursor which is difficult to prepare. Alkyl acrylates are preferred, and methyl acrylate is most preferred. While the decreased level of crystallinity resulting from increased comohomer levels has, in the past, been assumed to cause very high water sensitivity, (i.e. tendency to absorb water and become sticky, which can result in decreased weaving efficiency), this is not necessarily the case. Thus, very surprisingly, it was found that a copolymer containing 9 weight percent methyl acrylate was actually less water sensitive, (dissolved less rapidly, as determined by ease of water desizing), than that a ˜5.5 weight percent methyl methacryate PVA copolymer or an 88 % partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer. While not limiting ourselves to any particular theory, it is thought that methyl acrylate or other acryl ates as comonomer will decrease crystallinity in the resulting copolymer less than methyl methacrylate or other methacrylates do, even if the comonomer unit becomes laetonized, because of the lack of a methyl group attached to an in-chain carbon which methyl methacrylate produces when polymerized. Alternatively, differences in the amount of lactonization may be responsible. 
     Different comohomers will result in varying levels of water sensitivity in the resulting copolymer. The sensitivity will depend on the reduction in crystallinity due to increasing number of comohomer units (or derived lactone units), but will also depend on the net decrease in polarity with increasing comonomer level. While long alkyl chain alkyl acrylates and methacrylates are less polar than short alkyl chain ones, PVA copolymers of long chain acrylates and methacrylates, on lactonization may contain the same in-chain lactone group as that from any other acrylate or methacrylate copolymer respectively. However, methacrylate derived lactone tings will not be the same as acrylate derived lactone rings. In addition, the amount of lactonization may vary. In any event, any copolymer can be expected to have a water sensitivity which is a balance due to the amount of reduction in crystallinity the comonomer or derived lactone causes, and the overall decreased polarity of the copolymer with increasing comonomer or derived lactone content. All the ester comonomers and the lactone ting they can form, will be less polar and hence less water sensitive than vinyl alcohol units. 
     While methacrylate comohomer PVA copolymers are less favored, even here, as the comohomer level is increased significantly, decreased polarity in the copolymer will result. At very high comonomer levels, decreasing polarity will eventually override the increasing water sensitivity which results from decreasing crystallinity. The major advantage of ready desizing at high ester comohomer levels can make high comonomer level methyl methacrylate as well as acrylate PVA copolymers useful. Such copolymers will be particularly useful as blend components to improve overall de sizing of size materials which are difficult to desize. 
     Sizing may be carded out using solutions of the PVA copolymer and PVA polymer blend having a total polymer concentration of from 1 to 20 weight percent, preferably from 4 to 12 weight percent. The sizing composition may incorporate other materials typically found in prior art sizing compositions. Such materials may include waxy-type lubricants, defoaming surfactants, and other surfactants. A skilled artisan will be able to judge what concentration size solution to use to achieve his desired size add-on level, and what additives are best suited to his operations. 
     Desizing of sized fabrics is commonly carded out using water washing at varying temperatures. Surprisingly, it has been found that with the high ester comonomer levels of the PVA copolymers of the present invention, desizing can be carded out effectively with caustic solutions, and those caustic solutions can be very dilute. PVA homopolymers, and many PVA copolymers with lower levels of comonomer than the high ester copolymers of this invention, desize either less rapidly, or require higher temperatures and/or higher caustic concentrations for the same amount of desizing. Caustic desizing solutions can be as dilute as about 0.001 weight percent, particularly if somewhat elevated temperatures are used to desize, though concentrations above 0.05 weight percent will more often be required. Generally, more rapid, lower temperature or more complete alesizing is possible as the concentration is increased. However, in blends which contain partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer, more dilute caustic solutions may be favored, as examples discussed below show. Generally, the caustic will have to be subsequently washed out, so that higher concentration caustic than is adequate should be avoided. The caustic alesizing solutions should have, at the most, a concentration of 10 weight percent. Preferably however, they should be below 2 weight percent, and most preferably between 0.1 and 1.5 weight percent. For any particular PVA copolymer size or PVA polymer blend size, add-on level, fabric heat treatment, a suitable concentration for the desizing caustic solution and a suitable temperature for desizing can be readily determined when it has been decided how rapidly and how completely desizing is required. Thus the emphasis may be on the most rapid desizing for economic reasons. Or the emphasis may be on as low temperature desizing as possible because the material is somewhat temperature sensitive. Generally, almost complete alesizing is required. There will not be just one caustic concentration and one temperature which is suitable, but a range of alternatives. Suitable caustic materials include any of the alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates, i.e. sodium, potassium or lithium, with sodium hydroxide being preferred. Carbonates have been found to desize the copolymers and copolymer blends of the invention much less efficiently, though more efficiently in general than water. In some mills however, conditions may necessitate milder alesizing. When this is the case, carbonates can be used, and adjustments made in concentration and time and temperature of desizing. 
     It is important to recognize that, while sizes made from the high ester PVA copolymers alone or even the blend sizes of this invention, desize more rapidly and effectively in caustic than many PVA homopolymers or low comonomer PVA copolymers sizes materials or natural size materials such as starch, they may desize less effectively when normal (aqueous) alesizing is employed. Thus, as previously noted, a 9 weight percent methyl acrylate copolymer could not be desized as effectively as an 88% partially hydrolysed homopolymer or a 5.5 weight percent methyl methacrylate copolymer at 22 deg. C. This can be a significant advantage, since materials which do not desize readily in water will be less water sensitive and, in general, may have less tendency to become sticky in moist enviromnents. Of course, this does not mean that the blends of the invention can not be desized with water. However, longer times and or higher temperatures will be necessary than with eaufie desizing. 
     The yarns which can advantageously employ the sizes of this invention are any conventional yam, either from spun fiber or filament assemblages or other weavable structures, and may be hydrophilic such as cotton or hydrophobic such as nylon or polyester or from hydrophilic/hydrophobic combinations. Some finishing operations on (woven) textiles or even knitted fabrics can also advantageously employ the sizes of this invention. 
     The high ester PVA copolymer itself may have a 4% solution viscosity from 1 to 60 centipoise. Preferably it should have a viscosity between 3 and 25 centipoise. The skilled artisan will be able to determine the optimum polymer viscosity, polymer size concentration, and add-on level for the particular yam, fabric and weaving conditions he is using. 
     The other PVA polymer in the blend may be any PVA homopolymer previously known for use as size or other PVA copolymers previously used for size but containing low levels (less than 7 weight percent) of comonomer. This includes both fully and partially hydrolysed homopolymer, and PVA copolymers with less than 7 weight percent comonomer selected from the group consisting of alkyl methacrylates, alkyl acrylates, dialkyl fumarates and dialkyl maleates, wherein the alkyl group contains from 1 to 8 carbon atoms. Partially hydrolysed PVA may be from 50 to 98 % hydrolysed, but will preferably by above 80 % hydrolysed. 
     The blend used to prepare the size solution may contain from 10 to 90 weight percent of the high ester PVA copolymer and from 90 to 10 weight percent of the other PVA polymer. Preferably, however, there should be at least about 30 percent of the high ester PVA copolymer in the polymer blend used for the size. 
     The blends of this invention are ideally suited for use in sizes. However, the blends may also be adaptable for uses in certain film applications. Such films can include agricultural mulch films, biodegradable packaging films and water soluble films. The blends may also be adaptable for use as hot melt adhesives, binders and the like. 
     EXAMPLES 
     The PVA polymers used in the various examples and comparative examples are listed in Table I. Size solutions were made from these polymers or blends of these polymers, having a concentration of 8 weight percent total polymer, by dissolving them in water at about 90 deg. C., mixing for about 2 hours. The size solutions were clear and slightly viscous. When blend sizes were tested, the blends contained 50 weight percent of each component. The sizes used are listed in Table II. 
     Sized fabric samples were prepared as follows. Approximately 2 inch by 2 inch squares of a 7 ounce, all cotton, bleached, duck fabric type 464 obtained from Test Fabrics Inc. were first weighed, then soaked in size solution for about 2 minutes at about 35 deg. C., mixing gently. The samples were then dried by placing on aluminum foil, treated with Teflon lubricant to prevent sticking, at 50 deg. C. in a convection oven for 17+/-1 hours. They were then cooled in a calcium sulfate desiccated box, and reweighed to determine the amount of size added on. In some cases the samples were heat-treated by placing in a convection oven at 140 deg. C. for 10 minutes. 
     Desizing tests were carried out by soaking the sized fabric sample in 100 grams of the test desizing medium, (either water or caustic) for 10 minutes with gentle mixing. In some instances when water was used; the sample was further alesized by soaking in another 100 grams of water for 10 minutes. In all instances when caustic was used, the sample was subsequently soaked in 100 grams of water for 10 minutes. This subsequent water treatment washes out the caustic as well as providing for slight further desizing. The desized or partially desized samples were then dried in a convection air oven at 140 deg. C. for 1 hour and then allowed to cool in a calcium sulfate desiccated box. Details, are shown in the Tables IIIA and IIIB. 
     When examples of blend sizes of the invention are shown in the Tables, they are given a number without a prefix C. When examples of sizes outside the compositions of the invention are listed, whether from a single PVA polymer or from a blend which does not include the high ester PVA copolymer of the invention, they are labeled with a prefix C, indicating they are shown for comparison. The process of the invention includes a caustic desizing step. Examples which illustrate the process of the invention are shown with an asterisk (*). 
     While complete alesizing is generally considered necessary, the percent alesizing in the examples is considered to be an indication of the ease of complete desizing. If the value shown is less than 100%, then longer desizing times, different caustic concentration or somewhat higher temperatures would be necessary to achieve complete desizing. Examples C12 and C13 show that double washes (i.e. equivalent to longer alesizing times) produced increased alesizing, but the order of amount desized remains the same (compare C 1 and C2). 
     Table IIIA shows the effect of desizing single PVA polymers or blends of the invention in water. In some examples the sized fabrics were heat treated, and some were subjected to a double water wash. 
     Examples C1 to C5 are for single PVA polymers. C2 is for high ester PVA copolymer. High ester copolymer does not desize particularly well in water-in fact not as well as partially hydrolysed PVA hompolymer (C5) or lower comonomer content methyl methacrylate copolymer (C4). Examples C7 to C11 parallel C1 to C5 but the sized fabric has been heat treated. All are seen to alesize less readily after heat treatment. Examples 1 to 4 show that with water desizing, blending PVA polymers with the high ester PVA copolymer shows little or no improvement in ability to alesize. Example 3 for instance which is a blend of high ester copolymer and partially hydrolysed homopolymer desizes less that C5 which is size of the same partially hydrolysed homopolymer by itself. Only at higher temperatures, (Example 2) does high desizing occur. These experiments emphasize that with water desizing, blending is no advantage. The advantage comes only when caustic desizing is used. The experiments also emphasize that water sensitivity also would not increase significantly in the blend examples shown. 
     Table IIIB shows similar samples subjected to caustic alesizing, followed by a water wash. They demonstrate the complete difference in behavior between water alesizing and caustic desizing. They also demonstrate how addition of high ester comonomer PVA copolymer to various other PVA polymers improves the overall rate of desizing. Yet as table IIIA demonstrated, water sensitivity is not increased in general, as shown by no little to no improvement in water desizing by use of blending with high ester PVA copolymer. 
     Examples C14 to C19 are for single PVA polymer sizes, including high ester comonomer PVA copolymer (C15) which can be seen to be completely alesized by 1% caustic solution. Values above 100% are an artifact due to the fact that some of the fabric is lost in the process of alesizing, even with water (see value over 100% in Table IIIA). For this reason, it is likely that all values are up to about 5% higher than the true level of desizing achieved. Examples C20 to C23 and C25 are for the same five single PVA polymer sizes as C 14 to C19, except that the sized fabrics were heat treated. It is seen that all desize to a lesser extent after heat treatment, except the high ester comonomer PVA copolymer (C21). Examples C19 and C24 are for blends outside the invention. The rest, with an asterisk use the blend polymers of the invention with the process step of caustic alesizing. Comparison of Examples C 14 for fully hydrolysed PVA homopolymer with 5* and 6* for blends of fully hydrolysed homopolymer and high ester comonomer PVA copolymer shows the tremendous increase in the amount alesized. The difference between 5* and 6* is that 6* is a higher viscosity homopolymer (see Table I for H99-I and H99-2). Higher viscosity leads to less ready desizing. The most dramatic improvement seen is with partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer (alone in Examples C 18 and C23, size I), and blended with high ester comonomer PVA copolymer (Examples 7*, 11 *, 12* and 13*, size K, and 14* and 15* which use a higher viscosity partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer H88-2, see Table I) . Note that Example 12* shows that even very dilute caustic is effective in alesizing. Examples 7* and 13* show that KOH and NaOH give comparable desizing. Note the amazing decrease in amount of alesizing from example 14 to 15 despite a large increase in caustic concentration. This demonstrates the phenomenon that partially hydrolysed PVA homopolymer is subject to further hydrolysis, causing the resin to approach fully hydrolysed PVA homopolymer which is much less readily desized by any desizing medium. It also shows that, in this case, best alesizing medium is a more dilute caustic solution. In general, the strength of caustic most suitable will depend on the particular blend, and can be readily determined by a few experiments. 
     
                       TABLE I______________________________________PVA SAMPLES TESTED          Mole Solution PercentCode  Viscosity          Hydrolysis                    Composition Description______________________________________H88-1 21-26    87-89     Partially hydrolysed `homopoly-                    mer`H88-2 44-50    87-89     Partially hydrolysed `homopoly-                    mer`H99-1 12-15    99.0-99.8 `Fully` hydrolysed homopolymerH99-2 27-33    99.0-99.8 `Fully` hydrolysed homopolymerC3M   24-32    99.0-99.8 `Fully` hydrolysed homopolymer,                    3.3-4.3% MMAC5M   12-15    98.0-99.8 `Fully` hydrolysed homopolymer,                    5.0-6.0% MMAC9A   13-21    98.0-99.8 `Fully` hydrolysed homopolymer,                    8.5-10.5% MA______________________________________ Polymer code designations summarize the nature of the composition; H for Homopolymer, C for Copolymer 88 for ˜88 mole % hydrolysed, M for methyl methacrylate comohomer, and A for methyl acrylate comohomer. 
    
     Solution Viscosity in Centipoise, measured on a 4 weight percent solution at 20 deg. C., determined by Hoeppler falling ball method, bond dry basis. 
     All samples have a solution pH between 5 and 7. All samples have a maximum ash level of 0.7 weight percent calculated as sodium oxide, dry basis. 
     Comonomer level in copolymer is weight percent, calculated as non-lactonized comohomer unit in the poly(vinyl alcohol) chain. Comohomer abbreviations: MMA=methyl methacrylate MA=methyl aerylate 
     
                       TABLE II______________________________________COMPOSITION OF SIZES TESTEDSIZE         COMPOSITION______________________________________A            8% solution of H99-1B            8% solution of C9AC            8% solution of C3MD            8% solution of 50/50 H99-1/C3ME*           8% solution of 50/50 H99-1/C9AF*           8% solution of 50/50 C3M/C9AG            8% solution of C5MH*           8% solution of 50/50 C5M/C9AI            8% solution of H88-1J            8% solution of 50/50 C5M/H88-1K*           8% solution of 50/50 H88-1/C9AL*           8% solution of 50/50 H99-2/C9AM*           8% solution of 50/50 H88-2/C9A______________________________________ *Sizes used in Examples of Invention. Other sizes are for comparative purposes 
    
     
                       TABLE IIIA______________________________________WATER DESIZING TESTSEx-          Heat     Size   Desize                              Desize Percentample        Trtment  Weight Solu- Temp.  Size#     Size   Y/N      (grams)                        tion  Deg. C.                                     Removed______________________________________C1    A      N        .182   Water 22     27.5C2    B      N        .207   Water 23     36.6C3    C      N        .223   Water 22     29.7C4    G      N        .171   Water 22     51.9C5    I      N        .260   Water 22     65.5C6    D      N        .213   Water 22     27.01     E      N        .203   Water 22     43.42     E      N        .151   Water 80     114.03     K      N        .235   Water 22     60.6C7    A      Y        .173   Water 22     17.3C8    B      Y        .223   Water 23     23.5C9    C      Y        .217   Water 22     15.6C10   G      Y        .203   Water 22     31.3C11   I      Y        .245   Water 23     58.34     E      Y        .151   Water 22     25.0C12   A      N        .164   Water/                              22     34.6                        WaterC13   B      N        .272   Water/                              22     53.1                        Water______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE IIIB______________________________________CAUSTIC DESIZING TESTS                                      Per-       Heat                     Desize                                      cent       Trt-   Size              Temp. SizeEx          ment   Weight            Deg.  Re-#    Size   Y/N    (grams)                     Desize Solution                                C.    moved______________________________________C14  A      N      .182   1%NaOH/Water                                22    35.6C15  B      N      .324   1%NaOH/Water                                22    105.9C16  C      N      .230   1%NaOH/Water                                22    57.7C17  G      N      .144   1%NaOH/Water                                22    92.5C18  I      N      .255   1%NaOH/Water                                22    55.4C19  J      N      .207   1%NaOH/Water                                22    71.35*   E      N      .176   1%NaOH/Water                                22    79.66*   L      N      .212   1%NaOH/Water                                22    62.17*   K      N      .181   1%NaOH/Water                                22    97.68*   M      N      .236   1%NaOH/Water                                22    85.4C20  A      Y      .143   1%NaOH/Water                                22    19.1C21  B      Y      .249   1%NaOH/Water                                22    107.3C22  G      Y      .177   1%NaOH/Water                                22    67C23  I      Y      .266   1%NaOH/Water                                22    48.79*   E      Y      .180   1%NaOH/Water                                22    63.110*  H      Y      .189   1%NaOH/Water                                22    93.9C24  J      Y      .243   1%NaOH/Water                                22    50.6C25  C      Y      .192   1%NaOH/Water                                22    31.111*  K      Y      .241   1%NaOH/Water                                22    90.012*  K      N      .222   0.1%NaOH/  22    96.0                     Water13*  K      N      .197   1%KOH/Water                                22    96.614*  M      N      .206   0.1%KOH/Water                                22    94.815*  M      N      .223   2.5%NaOH/  22    78.9                     Water16*  F      Y      .221   1%NaOH/Water                                22    57.8______________________________________ Notes for Table IIIA and IIIB. Fabric samples were approximately 0.5 grams, varying from about 0.45 to 0.65 grams. Desizing liquid is either water or the caustic solution indicated. Percen is weight percent. NaOH and KOH are sodium and potassium hydroxide. Where two desizing liquids are shown, desizing was carried out in two liquids consecutively, e.g., caustic then water.