Abstract:
The silicon fluid ejector of the present invention includes an electrostatically actuated micromachined positive displacement mechanism consisting of a piston, piston containment structure, piston retraction mechanism and an ejection orifice. These features provide for very low cost of production, high reliability and “on demand” drop size modulation. The fluid ejector mechanism can be easily produced via monolithic batch fabrication based on the common production technique of surface micromachining.

Description:
REFERENCE TO PRIOR PROVISIONAL APPLICATION 
     This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/104,363, entitled “Ejector Mechanism” filed Oct. 15, 1998. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is drawn to a silicon based fluid ejector mechanism which operates on the principle of electrostatic attraction. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Most common ink jet drop ejectors are thermal or acoustic. Thermal ink jet (TIJ) technologies are based upon rapid nucleation which takes place within a channel containing a water based ink. Such a technology is very limited in its ability for “on demand” drop size modulation due to adding complexity and cost through the addition of multiple channel heaters of various sizes. The thermal ink jet technology is also limited in life characteristics due primarily to the intense heat that is generated and the subsequent thermal stressing and adverse reaction with inks. Additionally, thermal ejectors can be fairly inefficient and, as stated previously, can also generate a lot of heat. 
     Acoustic ejectors either displace a volume or propagate an acoustic pressure to generate a fluid drop. One of the most common of this type of technology is piezo based. Piezo technologies are theoretically capable of “on demand” drop size modulation and, because of the piezoelectric nature of their actuation, well designed applications have very long life characteristics. However, piezo based technologies are disadvantaged due to the high cost of processing piezo materials and the resulting size of an ink jet array (number of nozzles). Another type of acoustic ejector is Acoustic Ink Jet (AIP). Again, AIP suffers from the difficulty of making small structures such as 600 DPI, and also is fairly inefficient and costly. 
     Some electrostatically actuated ink jet technologies are based upon deformation of a membrane in a totally enclosed structure via electrostatic forces. Because of the totally enclosed, hence highly constrained structure, very large ejection mechanisms must be considered to compensate for the very small deformation of the membrane. This leads to very small drop sizes, very large ejection mechanisms, very large applied voltages and/or very high costs. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention is a fluid ejector that is low cost, uses standard silicon batch fabrication techniques, is useable with a wide variety of ink designs, reliable and ejects very small drops for gray scale printing. Some of the advantages of such a device over current types of ink jet ejectors (thermal, acoustic) are: drop size modulation can be achieved through controlling the amount of piston motion and the velocity of the piston (through the applied voltage/field); ink latitude (composition, type—i.e., water based, oil based) can be relatively large; various configurations (top shooter, side shooter, etc.) are possible consistent with the capabilities of production techniques, production costs will be low due to the use of common electronics industry surface micromachining technologies; and integrated electronic controls are achievable due to the nature of the silicon based production techniques used. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a cutaway profile view of a first embodiment of a fluid drop ejector  100 . 
     FIG. 2 is a cutaway profile view of a second embodiment of a fluid drop ejector  200 . 
     FIG. 3 is a cutaway profile view of a third embodiment of a fluid drop ejector  300 . 
     FIG. 4 is a top view of a square piston. 
     FIG. 5 is a top view of a rectangular piston. 
     FIG. 6 is a top view of a round piston. 
     FIG. 7 depicts a first ejecting signal  700  comprising a step function. 
     FIG. 8 depicts a second ejecting signal  800  comprising a bipolar pulse train, including a decreasing envelope. 
     FIG. 9 depicts a top view of a fluid drop ejector. 
     FIG. 10 depicts a top view of a 1-dimensional fluid drop ejector array  1000  comprising the FIG. 9 fluid drop ejectors. 
     FIG. 11 depicts a top view of a 2-dimensional fluid drop ejector array  1100  comprising the FIG. 9 fluid drop ejectors. 
     FIG. 12 depicts a first printing machine  1200  including the FIG. 10 array. 
     FIG. 13 depicts a second printing machine  1300  including the FIG. 11 array. 
     FIGS. 14-21 depict a method of fabricating a fluid drop ejector. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     FIG. 1 depicts a first embodiment of a fluid drop ejector  100 . There is shown a fluid drop ejector  100  comprising a containment wall  14 , a nozzle plate layer  20  disposed at one end of the containment wall  14 , the nozzle plate layer  20  including a nozzle opening  18 , a piston layer  12  disposed at the opposite end of the containment wall  14 , the piston layer  12  comprising a piston surface  12 A facing and substantially aligned with the nozzle opening  18 , the containment wall  14 , nozzle plate layer  20  and piston surface  12 A defining a cavity  24  that is arranged for containing fluid, the piston layer  12  arranged for moving towards the nozzle opening  18  when a fluid ejecting electric field is applied between the piston layer  12  and the nozzle plate layer  20 , thus causing fluid to be ejected through the nozzle opening  18 . 
     It will be appreciated that the electric field between the piston layer  12  and the nozzle plate layer  20  comprises opposite charges and, as a result, piston layer  12  and nozzle plate layer  20  attract each other. 
     In one embodiment, the fluid comprises ink. 
     In one embodiment, the piston surface  12 A is substantially square in shape, as shown in FIG.  4 . 
     In another embodiment, the piston surface  12 A is substantially rectangular in shape, as shown in FIG.  5 . 
     In still another embodiment, the piston surface  12 A is substantially circular in shape, as shown in FIG.  6 . 
     Still referring to FIG. 1, the ejector device  100  includes ejecting signal means  96  for applying an ejecting signal between the piston layer  12  and the nozzle plate layer, the ejecting signal arranged for modulating the amount of fluid that is ejected through the nozzle opening  18 . 
     As shown in FIG. 1, the piston surface  12 A forms an ejection stroke  30  when the piston layer  12  moves towards the nozzle opening  18 , the ejection stroke comprising an ejection stroke magnitude. In one embodiment, the ejecting signal  96  is arranged for controlling the ejection stroke magnitude  30 . 
     It will be appreciated that the piston surface  12 A forms a piston speed when the piston layer  12  moves towards the nozzle opening  18 . In another embodiment, therefore, the ejecting signal  96  is arranged for controlling the piston speed. 
     In FIG. 7, there is shown a first embodiment of an ejecting signal  96 . As shown, the ejecting signal comprises a step function  700 . It will be appreciated that the magnitude  704  and the pulse duration  705  will modulate the amount of fluid ejected. 
     In FIG. 8, there is shown a second embodiment of the ejecting signal  96 . As shown, the ejecting signal comprising a bipolar pulse train  800 , including an envelope  820  that decreases in time. 
     Returning now to FIG. 1, the fluid drop ejector  100  comprises a substrate  22 , the substrate  22  including a substrate surface  22 A, with the containment wall being disposed on the substrate surface  22 A. The fluid drop ejector  100  includes a plurality of piston springs  99 A,  99 B,  99 C,  99 D radiating away from the piston surface  12 A and coupled to the substrate surface  22 A. (FIG. 1 depicts piston springs  99 A,  99 B; the remaining piston springs  99 C,  99 D are depicted in FIGS. 4-6.) The plurality of piston springs  99 A,  99 B,  99 C,  99 D are arranged for providing mechanical spring tension for moving the piston layer  12  towards the substrate  22  when the fluid ejecting electric field is removed, and provide piston mounting and location. 
     In one embodiment, a faceplate layer  97 , is disposed on the nozzle layer  20 , the faceplate layer including a faceplate opening  92 , substantially congruent with the nozzle opening  18 . 
     The piston layer  12  is spaced a substantially fixed distance away from the substrate surface  22 A. In one embodiment, a retractor layer  94  is disposed on the substrate surface  22 A between the piston layer  12  and the substrate  22 . In this embodiment, the piston layer  12  is arranged for moving towards the substrate  22  when a retracting electric field is applied between the piston layer  12  and the retractor layer  94 , the retracting electric field being applied by a retracting signal means  93 . This ensures the piston returns to its start position in a very short time and also ensures the piston moves below the containment wall for ink inlet. 
     FIG. 2 depicts a second embodiment of a fluid drop ejector  200 . There is shown a fluid drop ejector  200  comprising a containment wall  14 ′, a nozzle plate layer  20 ′ disposed at one end of the containment wall  14 ′, the nozzle plate layer  20 ′ including a nozzle opening  18 , a piston layer  12  disposed at the opposite end of the containment wall  14 ′, the piston layer  12  comprising a piston surface  12 A facing and substantially aligned with the nozzle opening  18 , the containment wall  14 ′, nozzle plate layer  20 ′ and piston surface  12 A defining a cavity  24  that is arranged for containing fluid, the piston layer  12  arranged for moving towards the nozzle opening  18  when a fluid ejecting electric field is applied between the piston layer  12  and the nozzle plate layer  20 ′, thus causing fluid to be ejected through the nozzle opening  18 . 
     As in FIG. 1, the electric field between the piston layer  12  and the nozzle plate layer  20 ′ comprises opposite charges and, as a result, piston layer  12  and nozzle plate layer  20 ′ attract each other. 
     As in FIG. 1, in one embodiment, the fluid comprises ink. 
     Also as in FIG.  1 : 
     in one embodiment, the piston surface  12 A is substantially square in shape, as shown in FIG. 4; 
     in another embodiment, the piston surface  12 A is substantially rectangular in shape, as shown in FIG. 5; and 
     in still another embodiment, the piston surface  12 A is substantially circular in shape, as shown in FIG.  6 . 
     Still referring to FIG. 2, the ejector device  200  includes ejecting signal means  96  for applying an ejecting signal between the piston layer  12  and the nozzle plate layer  20 ′, the ejecting signal arranged for modulating the amount of fluid that is ejected through the nozzle opening  18 . 
     The piston surface  12 A forms an ejection stroke  30  when the piston layer  12  moves towards the nozzle opening  18 , the ejection stroke comprising an ejection stroke magnitude. In one embodiment, the ejecting signal  96  is arranged for controlling the ejection stroke magnitude  30 . 
     It will be appreciated that the piston surface  12 A forms a piston speed when the piston layer  12  moves towards the nozzle opening  18 . In another embodiment, therefore, the ejecting signal  96  is arranged for controlling the piston speed. For example, the ejecting signal  96  may comprise the first waveform  700  of FIG. 7, or the second waveform  800  of FIG.  8 . 
     Returning now to FIG. 2, similar to the first embodiment  100  of FIG. 1, the fluid drop ejector  200  comprises a substrate  22 , the substrate  22  including a substrate surface  22 A, with the containment wall  14 ′ being disposed on the substrate surface  22 A. The fluid drop ejector  200  includes a plurality of piston springs  99 A,  99 B,  99 C,  99 D radiating away from the piston surface  12 A and coupled to the substrate surface  22 A. (FIG. 2 depicts piston springs  99 A,  99 B; the remaining piston springs  99 C,  99 D are depicted in FIGS. 4-6.) The plurality of piston springs  99 A,  99 B,  99 C,  99 D are arranged for providing mechanical spring tension for moving the piston layer  12  towards the substrate  22  when the fluid ejecting electric field is removed. 
     As shown in FIG. 2, the fluid drop ejector  200  includes a faceplate layer  97 ′ disposed on the nozzle layer  20 ′, the faceplate layer including a faceplate opening  92 , substantially congruent with the nozzle opening  18 . 
     The piston layer  12  is spaced a substantially fixed distance away from the substrate surface  22 A. In one embodiment, a retractor layer  94  is disposed on the substrate surface  22 A between the piston layer  12  and the substrate  22 . In this embodiment, the piston layer  12  is arranged for moving towards the substrate  22  when a retracting electric field is applied between the piston layer  12  and the retractor layer  94 , the retracting electric field being applied by a retracting signal means  93 . 
     FIG. 3 depicts a third embodiment of a fluid drop ejector  300 . There is shown a fluid drop ejector  300  comprising a containment wall  14 ″, a nozzle plate layer  20 ″ disposed at one end of the containment wall  14 ″, the nozzle plate layer  20 ″ including a nozzle opening  18 , a piston layer  12 ′ disposed at the opposite end of the containment wall  14 ″. The piston layer  12 ′ comprises a piston surface  12 A′ facing and substantially aligned with the nozzle opening  18 . The containment wall  14 ″, nozzle plate layer  20 ″ and piston surface  12 A′ define a cavity  24  that is arranged for containing fluid. The piston layer  12 ′ is arranged for moving towards the nozzle opening  18  when a fluid ejecting electric field is applied between the piston layer and the nozzle plate layer  20 ″, thus causing fluid to be ejected through the nozzle opening  18 . The fluid drop ejector  300  further comprises a substrate  22 , the substrate  22  including a substrate surface  22 A. The nozzle plate layer  20 ″ is disposed on the substrate surface  22 A. The substrate layer  22  includes a substrate opening  93  substantially congruent with the nozzle opening  18 . 
     As in FIGS. 1-2, the electric field between the piston layer  12 ′ and the nozzle plate layer  20 ″ comprises opposite charges and, as a result, piston layer  12 ′ and nozzle plate layer  20 ″ attract each other. 
     As in FIGS. 1-2, in one embodiment, the fluid comprises ink. 
     Also as in FIG.  1 - 2 : 
     in one embodiment, the piston surface  12 A′ is substantially square in shape, similar to piston surface  12 A shown in FIG. 4; 
     in another embodiment, the piston surface  12 A′ is substantially rectangular in shape, similar to piston surface  12 A shown in FIG. 5; and 
     in still another embodiment, the piston surface  12 A′ is substantially circular in shape, similar to piston surface  12 A shown in FIG.  6 . 
     Still referring to FIG. 3, the ejector device  300  includes ejecting signal means  96  for applying an ejecting signal between the piston layer  12 ′ and the nozzle plate layer  20 ″, the ejecting signal arranged for modulating the amount of fluid that is ejected through the nozzle opening  18 . 
     The piston surface  12 A′ forms an ejection stroke  30  when the piston layer moves towards the nozzle opening  18 , the ejection stroke comprising an ejection stroke magnitude. In one embodiment, the ejecting signal  96  is arranged for controlling the ejection stroke magnitude  30 . 
     It will be appreciated that the piston surface  12 A′ forms a piston speed when the piston layer moves towards the nozzle opening  18 . In another embodiment, therefore, the ejecting signal  96  is arranged for controlling the piston speed. For example, the ejecting signal  96  may comprise the first waveform  700  of FIG. 7, or the second waveform  800  of FIG.  8 . 
     Returning now to FIG. 3, the fluid drop ejector  300  includes a plurality of piston springs  99 A′ and  99 B′ radiating away from the piston surface  12 A′ and coupled to containment wall  14 ″. The plurality of piston springs  99 A′ and  99 B′ are arranged for providing mechanical spring tension for moving the piston layer  12 ′ towards the substrate  22  when the fluid ejecting electric field is removed. 
     FIG. 9 depicts a top view of a fluid drop ejector  900 . The ejector  900  may comprise any of the foregoing fluid drop ejector embodiments, namely, the first embodiment  100  of FIG. 1, the second embodiment  200  of FIG. 2, or the third embodiment  300  of FIG.  3 . As shown, the ejector  900  includes a square-shaped piston surface  12 . However, it will be appreciated that, in the alternative, a round- or rectangular-shaped piston surface  12  may be used. 
     FIG. 10 depicts a top view of a 1-dimensional array  1000  of fluid drop ejectors, each ejector comprising the FIG. 9 fluid drop ejector. While three (3) ejectors  1001 - 1003  are shown, it will be appreciated that any number of ejectors may be added, represented by the symbol  1010 , to form any page-width size. 
     FIG. 11 depicts a top view of a 2-dimensional array  1100  of fluid drop ejectors, each ejector comprising the FIG. 9 fluid drop ejector. While the array  1100  is depicted as comprising 2 ejector rows  1101  and  1102 , it will be appreciated that any number of ejector rows may be added, represented by the symbol  1139 . Also, while each row  1101  and  1102  is depicted as comprising three (3) ejectors each, it will be appreciated that any number of ejectors may be added to each row, represented by the symbols  1119  and  1129 , to form any page-width size. 
     FIG. 12 depicts a first printing machine  1200  which includes the 1-dimensional array  1000  of FIG.  10 . 
     FIG. 13 depicts a second printing machine  1300  which includes the 2-dimensional array  1100  of FIG.  11 . 
     FIGS. 14-21 depict a method of fabricating a fluid drop ejector. 
     In FIG. 14, in one embodiment an optional SiO 2  mask layer  1400  is deposited on the substrate surface  22 A. 
     Still referring to FIG. 14, in one embodiment an ink inlet channel  98  is provided to allow ink to be supplied to the cavity  24 . 
     In FIG. 15, a SiNi x  layer  1500  is deposited. Note the containment walls  14  are beginning to be formed. 
     In FIG. 16, a polysilicon “0” layer  1600  is deposited. 
     In FIG. 17, a sacrificial oxide layer  1700  is deposited in a pattern such that regions  1701 ,  1702 ,  1703  and  1704  are formed. These latter regions  1701 - 1704  will later form attachment points for the piston spring legs  99 A,  99 B,  99 C, and  99 D. The pattern in layer  1700  also provides electrical connections for the piston spring legs  99 A- 99 D. 
     In FIG. 18, a polysilicon “1” layer  1800  is deposited. Note the layer  1800  comprises the piston layer  12 . 
     In FIG. 19, a further sacrificial oxide layer  1900  is deposited. Also in FIG. 19, a polysilicon “2” layer  1950  is deposited. 
     In FIG. 20, a still further sacrificial oxide layer  2000  is deposited. 
     In FIG. 21, a polysilicon “3” layer  2100  is provided. Note that layer  2100  corresponds to nozzle layer  20  in FIG.  1 . Also note that layer  2100  includes a nozzle opening  18 . 
     Still referring to FIG. 21, the optional SiO 2  mask layer  1400 , SiNi x  layer  1500 , polysilicon “0” layer  1600 , sacrificial oxide layer  1700 , polysilicon “1” layer  1800 , further sacrificial oxide layer  1900 , polysilicon “2” layer  1950 , and still further sacrificial oxide layer  2000  comprise the containment wall  14 . Moreover, the containment wall  14 , polysilicon “3” layer  2100  (nozzle plate layer  20  in FIG. 1) and piston surface  12 A (polysilicon “1” layer  1800 ) define a cavity  24  that is arranged for containing fluid. 
     Preferably the devices  100 ,  200 ,  300  will be surface micromachined on silicon substrate  22 . 
     Electrostatic piston drop ejectors can be designed to eject a drop normal to the silicon substrate surface  22 A (top shooter as in FIGS.  1 - 2 ), or into the silicon substrate  22  (bottom shooter as in FIG.  3 ). The top shooter embodiments shown in FIGS. 1-2 can be fabricated using Sandia National Laboratories&#39; five layer surface micromachined polysilicon SUMMiT process. 
     Fluid is drawn into an ejection cavity  24  by flowing between the edge of the piston and the containment wall using passive capillary pressure or active external pump means. A voltage V is applied between the ejection electrode, which is the face of the ejector containing the ejection orifice, and the piston structure. 
     Mechanical spring structure  99 A,  99 B,  99 C,  99 D may take the form of a serpentine spring with a varying number of legs and leg dimensions, two crossed beams, a triple simply supported beam structure, a coil retraction structure, a four beam piston support, and a centrally supported structure with three retraction legs, as well as any other biasing support structure. 
     Piston movement  30  causes an increase in fluid pressure within ejection cavity  24 , causing a drop of fluid to be ejected through ejection orifice  18 . 
     As shown in FIG. 1, the ejection pressure achievable is controlled by several factors, one of which is the clearance between the piston perimeter and the “cylinder walls”  26 , which are disposed on the nozzle plate layer  20 . This clearance area should be kept small relative to the “swept” area of the piston for best performance. This approach eliminates the problems of the totally sealed zero clearance, “oil can” type of electrostatic ejection mechanisms heretofore considered. Once the ejection stroke  30  of the piston is completed, the ejecting voltage  96  to the electrodes are shut down, either instantaneously or in a controlled fashion, and the retraction mechanism  99 A,  99 B,  99 C,  99 D causes the piston  12  to return to its rest position. 
     One of the key areas which distinguishes this approach from other approaches to electrostatic ink jet concepts is the provision for a small clearance dimension D C  between the outer perimeter of the driven piston which forcibly expels the drop and the inner part of the constraining cylinder wall  26 . In one possible embodiment, the piston stops in its rest position such that the piston stops flush with top of the cylinder wall  26  (D A  equals 0 in this case). In such an embodiment, the dimension D C  governs refill performance and must obviously be kept reasonably small to enable pressure build-up and consequent drop expulsion as the piston is driven towards the orifice plate. As the piston retracts, refill of the ejection chamber is accomplished through fluid making its way through this small dimension. Since the maximum operating speed can be determined in large part to the amount of the total cycle time that must be allowed for refill, the dynamics of this fluid flow can obviously limit the operating speed of such a device through the fluidic resistance that it imposes. 
     To alleviate the above situation an actuator design which allows the piston “rest” position to be slightly “above” the cylinder wall  26 . In this case D A  is greater than zero. This added dimension, allowing the piston to retract slightly into the open ink “pool” creates a very low resistance annular passage through which the fluid can flow back into the ejection chamber, hence greater operating speed potential. 
     As shown in FIGS. 7-8, a tailored voltage application profile to effect the desired piston motion may also be used. For increased performance capability, rather than simply turning the electric field “on” and “off” at the prescribed times, a tailored voltage profile is applied which generates the required piston dynamics. For instance, at the initiation of piston motion a high voltage would be applied. This, for example only, could be linearly decreased as the piston progresses through its motion. Such a tailoring of piston motion/pressures could result in higher drop ejection performance more controlled droplet ejection velocity, etc. 
     In the relatively simple piston motion control system described above, as shown in FIG. 7, the actuating voltage is “on” for a prescribed amount of time followed by turning the voltage “off” at the appropriate time to cease piston motion. The piston position is thus inferred as a function of time. To ensure accurate piston motion, a piston motion sensing and feedback control system can be used. For increased performance capability, what is proposed is rather than simply turning the electric field “on” and “off” at the prescribed times, the position of the piston is sensed in its motion via sensing the capacitance changes between the two electrodes piston and orifice plate. The sensing of the position enables a more accurate and robust control mechanism via the real time variation of applied voltages. 
     For increased performance capability, an active return mechanism (the retractor layer  94  in FIGS. 1-2) may be used. Rather than simply turning the electric field off and allowing the spring to return the piston to its rest position, the voltage is maintained on the piston member but switched from the orifice plate to the ejector substrate. This reverses the field that is acting upon the piston and causes an additional active force to be applied to the piston to allow for significantly increased performance in terms of operating speed refill performance. 
     In summary, the ejector mechanisms  100 ,  200 ,  300  shown in FIGS. 1-3 are based upon the production technique of surface micromachining. As can be seen, the size of the drop ejected is dependent upon the volume displaced by the piston mechanism. For a given required drop size and a given possible microstructure height, the cross sectional area of the ejector is then determined. If the required drop size is large, the possible microstructure height is small, then either the cross sectional area of the individual ejector must increase to compensate or the number of individual small ejectors must increase each delivering a fraction of the ink required for proper fill of the pixel. In either case, a two dimensional array (shown in FIG. 11) may be required. 
     To reduce the probability of the need for a two dimensional array, a method of increasing the possible active height of the ejector microstructure is proposed using a production technique based upon two commonly available production technologies; high aspect ratio etch technology combined with surface micromachining. The following briefly describes the construction of such a device using the combined techniques of high aspect ratio etch technology and surface micromachining. 
     The electrodes are designed to work with both conductive and non-conductive inks. Materials exposed to ink (internal to the fluid ejector) are wettable hydrophilic surfaces and with a contact angle with ink being less than 40 degrees. There are no wear material requirements, but ink washability requirements. There can be no peeling or pin holes because inks are very aggressive with a pH greater than 8. Some typical materials are Parylene, silicon carbide and Tantallum, if Tantallum meets resistivity requirements. 
     Other material requirements include materials exposed to air, such as the nozzle and front face are non-wettable hydrophobic surfaces and the contact angle with ink is less than 75 degrees. There are wear requirements with the materials exposed to air. Typical materials include DLC+Fluorinated hydrocarbon, MERF PTFE base. 
     Pagewidth applications of the fluid ejector mechanism are shown in FIGS. 10 and 11. The pagewidth arrays  1000  and  1100  greatly increase productivity while offering significant cost and power advantages over other pagewidth ink jet arrays being considered for different technologies TIJ, piezo, acoustic. This greatly increases productivity over partial width arrays. Further, a pagewidth array of electrostatic fluid ejectors offers significant cost manufacturing process driven and power and size physics driven advantages over full width arrays considered for other ink jet technologies thermal, acoustic. 
     Dependent upon the requirements for ejected drop size and the microstructure manufacturing process selected, it may be highly beneficial to use a fluid ejector system as a two dimensional array  1100  shown in FIG.  11 . For instance, the ejected drop size is dependent upon the stroke length of the piston. If the required drop size is larger than what can be delivered by this stroke, one approach is to slow the system down and place multiple drops within a very short distance of each other, essentially growing the developed spot. This is done in some ink jet applications today. Another approach is to grow the diameter of piston bore, since the ejected drop volume goes as approximately as the square of this dimension. However, this new size may not be compatible with a linear array whose ejector center to center distance is equal to the desired printing resolution i.e., 300 dpi, 600 dpi, etc. A solution is to place the ink jet ejectors in a 2 dimensional array. Due to the nature of the manufacturing processes used, such an array can be fabricated with little cost increase over a more conventional linear array. 
     The nozzle plate  20  can be fabricated from a thin film that is coated on one surface front face  97  for hydrophoebicity and on the other for electrical conductivity (electrode side) and then the nozzles are laser ablated. The plate is then aligned and affixed with adhesives to the electrostatic actuator mechanism. This approach facilitates the coating of the internal components of the electrostatic ejector and manufacturing of a robust nozzle plate. 
     An example of the face plate  97  design is similar to a TIJ design, except for the conductive inner surface coating  80 , is a 25-50 micron thick film of Upilex film coated on one side with a hydrophobic coating of thickness less than 2 microns. Requirements of coating are well established by TIJ that include compatibility with TIJ inks and durability to wiping blade. 
     The other side is selectively etched and has a semi-conductive coating that is resistant to ink. The etched patterns include only the electrodes and not the nozzles which will be laser ablated and not the areas where it will be attached to the drop ejector since an electrically insulative contact is needed. 
     On the second side, the film is coated with an adhesive of thickness around 5 microns. Types of adhesives are well established by TIJ. Holes are ablated through Upilex film. Holes are round, 10-25 micron in diameter, on a spacing of 42.3-13 micron centers. The total array length may be manufacture as desired. 
     While various embodiments of a fluid drop ejector, in accordance with the present invention, have been described hereinabove, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.