Abstract:
The present invention provides an inexpensive scanner that can scan at near to medium focal lengths. A light beam is generated to illuminate a target area on the scanned object. A mirrored surface directs the light beam towards the object and light reflected from the object to a detector. The detector is positioned to receive a constant amount of reflected light from the mirrored surface.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention generally relates to scanners using light to read coded symbologies of varying reflectivity. More particularly, the invention pertains to scanners having rotating mirror wheels in the path of the laser light used to detect and read coded symbologies. Most particularly, the invention pertains to laser scanners having simplified optics for emitting and collecting the light used to read coded symbologies in near to medium focal ranges. 
     2. Description of the Prior Art 
     Coded symbologies, such as bar coded symbols, are well known. Coded symbols generally use light and dark areas of varying size in specified combinations. Each unique combination of light and dark areas represents encoded information. Coded symbology scanners read the code by passing a beam of light over it, collecting information in the form of light reflected back from the code, and decoding the collected information. 
     Prior art bar code scanners can be divided into two main categories, coaxial and non-coaxial. U.S. Pat. No. 5,028,772 is an example of a coaxial bar code reader. In this patent, a laser emits a beam of light which ultimately passes through an apertured mirror to a facet on a rotating polygon. The beam reflects off the facet through a second series of mirrors and towards a target surface. The light beam reflects off the target surface as diffused light. The diffused light passes back through the second series of mirrors towards a facet. The diffused light reflects off the facet towards the apertured mirror. All of the reflected light, except that which passes through the aperture, is directed towards a lens which focuses it onto a photo detector. Since the emitted light beam and the returned light follow the same path or axis, this scanner is referred to as coaxial. Coaxial scanners are particularly useful in reading surfaces at long focal lengths. During manufacture, coaxial scanners require testing and fine tuning to insure proper alignment of the laser, mirrors, polygon, lens and detector. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,262,628 is an example of a non-coaxial bar code reader. A laser emits a beam of light which is guided by a mirror towards a facet on a rotating polygon. The beam reflects off the facet towards the object. Upon striking the object, diffused light reflects off the surface. A detector is positioned at the front of the scanner to collect the diffused light. In this scanner, the emitted light beam and the detected light follow two distinct paths or axis. One axis is through the polygon to the surface. The other is from the surface directly to the detector. There is no attempt or means for focusing the diffused light on the detector. This scanner is referred to as non-coaxial. 
     Another example of a non-coaxial scanner is U.S. Pat. No. 3,813,140. The laser emits a beam of light directly towards a facet of the polygon. The beam reflects off the facet towards the target. The light reflected from the target is diffused and returns along a different axis to another facet of the polygon. This facet directs the diffused light towards a mirror. The mirror guides the diffused light towards a detector. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,115,703 is another example of non-coaxial scanner. The laser emits a beam of light directly at the surface to be scanned. The light reflects off the surface and passes through an aperture in the scanner located directly above the target area. The returned light passes through a lens barrel to a photo detector. To read a code, the scanner must be manually moved across the entire code. Non-coaxial scanners are inexpensive and effective at short focal lengths. At longer focal lengths, non-coaxial scanners are not as effective due to ambient light reaching the detector. 
     There exists a need for an inexpensive scanner that can scan at near to medium focal lengths of up to two feet from the target area. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention provides an inexpensive scanner that can scan at near to medium focal lengths. A light beam is generated to illuminate a target area on the scanned object. A mirrored surface directs the light beam towards the object and light reflected from the object to a detector. The detector is positioned to receive a constant amount of reflected light from the mirrored surface. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is an isometric view of the elements of the present invention without all of the details of the scanner. 
     FIG. 2 is a top view diagram illustrating the light paths of the present invention to and from a target area. 
     FIG. 3 is a side view diagram illustrating the light paths of the invention to and from a target area. 
     FIG. 4 illustrates the light paths between the laser diode assembly, detector and a facet. 
     FIG. 5 illustrates the light paths between a facet and the scanned object. 
     FIG. 6 illustrates the areas of the facet struck by the light traveling to the object and the light traveling to the detector. 
     FIG. 7 illustrates the location of the detector&#39;s collecting surface in relation to the returned light when the polygon is returning the maximum amount of light. 
     FIG. 8 illustrates the location of the collecting surface in relation for an intermediate amount of returned light. 
     FIG. 9 illustrates the location of the collecting surface in relation to the minimum amount of returned light. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the drawn figures wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout. Scanner elements, such as chips, wiring, fasteners and brackets not necessary to discuss the features of the present invention are not illustrated as they will be known to those skilled in the art. 
     As illustrated in FIG. 1, the present invention has a laser diode assembly  101 , such as Laser Diode Rohm RLD-65PC, a rotating polygon  102  with facets  105 ,  106 ,  107 ,  108 ,  109 ,  110 , a filter  103 , such as Spectro-Film B-34913, and a photo detector  104 , such as PIN Photo Diode EG&amp;G VTP4085. 
     As shown in the top view of FIG. 2, the laser assembly  101  emits a beam of light  202  towards the polygon  102 . The beam  202  is reflected off the facet  105  of the polygon  102  toward the coded symbology  201 . The beam  202  strikes the target  201  and is reflected as the diffused light  203 . The diffused light  203  impinging on the facet  105  is reflected toward the filter  103  and the detector  104 . The filter  103  only allows light which has the same wavelength as the emitted light beam  202  to pass through to the detector  104 . Using the preferred components, the emitted light beam  202  has a wavelength of 655 nanometers and the filter  103  passes light within a 40 nanometer bandwidth centered around 660 nanometers. The reflected, diffused light  203  is collected by detector  104  and subsequently processed in a known manner and decoded. 
     FIG. 3 is a side view of the present invention in a preferred arrangement. In this embodiment, the laser diode assembly  101  is located directly above the detector  104 . In this view, it can be seen that the polygon height is increased over that of the prior art as indicated by dashed line  204  so that the laser diode assembly  101  and the detector  104  are pointed in the same direction but not on a common horizontal center. As a result, the laser beam  202  strikes the facet  105  towards the top. The diffused returning light  203  strikes the entire surface of the facet  105 . While all of the diffused light is directed back in the direction of the filter  103  and detector  104 , the detector  104  only collects the reflected light  203  that impinges on its surface area. Under the present arrangement, the polygon  102  allows the laser beam  202  to be centered about one axis and the detector  104  to be about another axis so that the diffused light  203  reflected on the detector  104  is not co-axial with the beam. 
     Typically, coaxial scanners focus all of the diffused light  203  from facet  105  on the detector  104 , and non-coaxial scanners do not use a facet or focus return light on the detector  104 . In the present invention, the height of the polygon has been increased to avoid reflection of the laser beam  202  on the detector  104 , and to eliminate the need for a focusing mirror in the return path. When viewed from above as in FIG. 2, the diffused light  203  encompasses the axis of the emitted light beam  202 . As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the emitted beam  202 , between the laser diode assembly  101  and the facet  105 , is on a given centerline or emission path and the reflected light&#39;s centerline  401  is returning at an incident angle α based on its reflection from the object&#39;s surface  201 . The return light  203  available to detector  104  strikes the facet  105  at a position  602  which is separate from and spaced from the beam&#39;s position  601  as shown in FIG.  6 . Accordingly, the reflected light will be directed toward the detector  104  along a centerline  401  that is spaced from the centerline of beam  202 . Since the emitted light beam  202  and the diffused light  203  travel similar but separate paths, the present invention may be termed quasi-coaxial. 
     When the facet  105  of the present embodiment is rotated during a sweep, the cross-section of the facet  105  facing the detector  104  varies. As a result, the area of light reflected toward the detector  104  varies. Because there is no means for focusing the returning diffused light  203  on the detector  104 , the reflected diffused light varies in position relative to the detector  104 . 
     FIGS. 7,  8  and  9  show this variance in relation to the light collecting surface  702  of the stationary detector  104 . FIG. 7 shows the area  701  of returned light when the polygon is rotated to return a maximum amount of diffused light. FIG. 8 shows the area  801 , when the polygon is rotated to return an intermediate amount of diffused light. FIG. 9 shows the area  901 , when the polygon is rotated to return a minimum amount of diffused light. As illustrated in these figures, there exists within each area an area  703  of returned diffused light  203  that will be constant regardless of the position of the polygon  102 . In the present invention, the detector  104  is sized to have a collecting surface area  702  that is within the constant area  703 . The detector  104  is then located at a distance from the rotating surface so that it will be at the confluence of the areas  703  regardless of the polygon&#39;s position. With this sizing and positioning, the collecting surface  702  will be in an area flooded by returned light and will be one hundred percent (100%) impinged by returned light. As a result, the detector  104  reacts as if it was seeing one hundred percent (100%) of the returned light at all times. Although allowing much of the returned light to pass by the detector&#39;s impingement surface  702  may seem inefficient, it has desirable properties. This construction avoids the need for apertured mirrors, in the path of the emitted light, to focus reflected light on the detector. This construction also takes advantage of the total impingement at all angles to avoid the need for precise location of the major components relative to each other. Additionally, the preferred filter  103  only allows light with an angle of incidence within a range centered about the mirror to the filter&#39;s surface to pass. The construction of the present invention returns the reflected diffused light at such an angle. 
     The present invention has been found to read codes up to two feet from the scanner, but the preferred range is within one foot from the scanner. In addition to its desirability for inexpensive fabrication, this simplified design minimizes testing and adjusting during manufacture and the need for field adjustments.