Abstract:
The invention relates to a method for adjusting a system that changes in a cycle to a nonconstant cyclic target profile by comparing measured actual values with appropriate target values for the target profile and outputting a control value.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]    This application is a national phase application, filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 371, of PCT application PCT/DE2007/000154 filed Jan. 25, 2007, which claims priority to DE application 10 2006 005 927.7 filed Feb. 8, 2006, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. 
     
    
     TECHNICAL FIELD  
       [0002]    The invention relates to a method for adjusting a system that changes in a cycle to a nonconstant cyclic target profile by comparing measured actual values with appropriate target values for the target profile and outputting a control value. The invention also relates to a controller for a system that changes in a cycle for adjustment to a nonconstant target profile. 
         [0003]    In simple forms of application, standard controllers adjust a system to a constant prescribed value. However, ff the prescribed values are meant to change cyclically such that a prescribed profile is followed, the controller accordingly needs to be set to follow. The complexity for this is high, as different curve shapes require different settings. Additionally the computer following the prescribed profile cannot have its control parameters set in optimum fashion if different frequency components arise for the discrepancies between the actual curve and the target profile. 
         [0004]    For example, if a target profile is prescribed cyclically at the controller target input, and the system gives a different response over the prescribed cycle for each prescribed point at the respective time of the cycle, a nonlinear system is produced which is no longer able to be implemented using a standard controller (for example a PID controller). This applies particularly if the system to be controlled produces a specific step response for each profile point, such that it has a different characteristic for each point over the course of the profile. 
       SUMMARY  
       [0005]    One embodiment of the present invention is a method that provides control over a nonconstant cyclic target profile using conventional standard controllers. The cyclic target profile is divided into a prescribed number of time periods so that for each time period, a target value for the target profile is prescribed and a current actual value is determined. For each such time period a dedicated controller is used to perform the control separately on the basis of the target value and the actual value. 
         [0006]    Another embodiment of the present invention is a controller which includes a multiplicity of digital signal controllers, a control circuit which divides the cycle into sections corresponding to the number of signal controllers and assigns each signal controller a prescribed target value and a measured actual value, and an output arrangement for the controller values generated by the signal controllers. 
         [0007]    In a further embodiment, the present invention provides numerous digital signal controllers which are respectively associated with a time period within the cycle and perform conventional control, for example PID control, for this time period. The multiplicity of controllers operating in parallel with one another allows each signal controller to be assigned the parameters of the system which are relevant to it as control parameters. This value is constant because the controller according to the invention approximates the target profile using a multiplicity of profile points, and each profile point represents a constant target value to which constant system conditions apply, so that the parameterization for this profile point has also been fixed so long as the system does not change. 
         [0008]    The controller values are preferably output as a control profile at the end of a cycle of target profile and actual profile. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
         [0009]      FIG. 1  shows a schematic illustration of a controller arrangement with a nonconstant target profile and a nonlinear controlled system; and 
           [0010]      FIG. 2  shows a schematic illustration of the invention with a multiplicity of single controllers which are responsible for a respective time period. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0011]    The control system shown in  FIG. 1  starts from a prescribed target profile  1 , which represents in one embodiment the force exerted on an artificial foot during a flexing process. The target profile is compared in a comparator  2  with a response profile  3  from a controlled, nonlinear system  4 . The result from the comparator  2  is sent to the controller  5 , which is, in one embodiment a PID controller. 
         [0012]    The response profile (actual profile)  3  may exhibit heavy distortion in comparison with the target profile  1 . Since the conditions for the system  4  are constantly changing over time on account of the prescribed target profile  1 , the PID controller  5  is divided into a multiplicity of signal controllers  50 ,  51 ,  52  . . . connected in parallel, as shown schematically in  FIG. 2 . 
         [0013]      FIG. 2  shows a target curve or profile  6  and an actual curve  7  in a simple form. On the basis of the difference between the respective target value and the respective actual value determined in the comparator  2 , the controller  5 , for example in the form of a simple proportional controller, generates a controller profile  8  at its output which approximates the actual curve  7  to the target curve  6 . 
         [0014]      FIG. 2  also shows a cycle along the x-axis for the forces which are produced during the flexing process for an artificial foot when walking. The cycle is split into numerous identical time periods  90 ,  91 ,  92 , etc., which respectively have an associated PID signal controller  50 ,  51 ,  52 , etc. From the target profile  6 , the signal controllers  50 ,  51 ,  52  obtain the target value R (reference) appropriate to the relevant time period  90 ,  91 ,  92  and also an actual value E (input), from which a difference value is obtained which can be processed by the signal controller  50 ,  51 ,  52  and from which a controller signal A (output) is generated by the signal controller  50 ,  51 ,  52 . 
         [0015]    The signal controllers  50 ,  51 ,  52  are set by means of their customary control parameters Kp for the P component, Ti for the I component and Td for the D component such that they match the response of the nonlinear system in the state in the associated time interval  90 ,  91 ,  92 .  FIG. 2  alos shows that the cycle is divided into n+1 time intervals  90 ,  91 ,  92 , etc., and therefore has n+1 single controllers  50 ,  51 ,  52 , etc. 
         [0016]    The controller  5  according to the invention can correct systems which have different step responses at different times within the cycle. To this end, different parameterization (Kp, Ti, Td) can be produced for each curve point. The output values are preferably calculated when a complete cycle has ended. 
         [0017]    To produce control for the load placed on an artificial foot during a flexing process, the new output values are calculated and the new output profile is output therefrom. The output profile may differ significantly from the target or actual profile. The fresh load placed on the system by the new output profile produces a new actual profile which is used as an input variable for the controller, while the target profile remains constant. 
         [0018]    A prerequisite for the operation of the controller is that the system responds at the point (also at the time) in the profile at which the controller also expects a change. Should phase shifts arise in the system, the phase shift needs to be eliminated. In the aforementioned testing system, this can be achieved by a simple lead in the output profile. 
         [0019]    For the greatest possible accuracy, the largest possible number of signal controllers  50 ,  51 ,  52  should be provided for dividing the cycle. However, the number actually provided is dependent on the implementation of the controller and the available memory and also on the computation power of the digital circuit.