Abstract:
A control-holding device to be mounted so as to selectively engage the end of a twist-grip control and hold it still at the discretion of the user, the device including an interchangeable mounting means that may be specific to the machine to which it is attached, a stationary element connected to the machine through the mounting means, a moving element which is manipulated to allow or disallow engagement with the twist-grip, an elastic or propulsive element that presses the moving element to engage the twist-grip when the moving element is manipulated in the prescribed way, and a standard means to mount accessories onto the outboard side of the mechanism.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
       [0001]    This application is associated only with provisional patent application No. 61/063,167. 
     
    
     STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT 
       [0002]    Neither this application nor the work involved in the development of the disclosed technology are associated with external funding, sponsorship or subsidy of any kind, beyond applicant Paul Ashman and his chapter S corporation, !!!MANIC Salamander, Inc. 
       REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING, A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING COMPACT DISC APPENDIX 
       [0003]    No compact disc or other physical media are included in this application. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0004]    1. Field of the Invention 
         [0005]    The present invention relates to a twist-grip control apparatus for manually operated machinery such as motorcycles, and more particularly a device that is both triggered and released through user manipulation of the device, to hold the twist-grip still, and can be overridden while active by the user. 
         [0006]    2. References Cited 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
                 5,893,295 
                 July 1997 
                 Bronnert 
               
               
                   
                 4,287,785 
                 September 1981 
                 Hunt 
               
               
                   
                 4,060,008 
                 November 1977 
                 Wilkinson 
               
               
                   
                 6,820,710 
                 November 2004 
                 Fechner 
               
               
                   
                 4,256,197 
                 March 1981 
                 Kiser, Jr. 
               
               
                   
                 4,286,700 
                 September 1981 
                 Morris et al. 
               
               
                   
                 4,364,283 
                 December 1982 
                 Ricardo 
               
               
                   
                 4,137,793 
                 February 1979 
                 Sowell 
               
               
                   
                 3,982,446 
                 September 1976 
                 Van Dyken 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0007]    3. Discussion of Prior Art 
         [0008]    The concept of a device to hold a motorcycle throttle still is well-known, and more than 30 years old, as the references show. Many have been patented, and many are currently on the market. The present invention distinguishes itself by the combination of its simplicity, safety, reliability, ease of use, easy setup, range of application, simple appearance, and its taking up no room on the handlebars. An evaluation of the prior art resulted in the selection of the above references, which appear to be representative of the basic sorts of solutions so far offered. 
         [0009]    Here follows a summary of the basic methods so far employed. 
         [0010]    Ricardo and many others employ a threaded member to interfere to varying degrees with the portion of the throttle sleeve that is inside the control housing given on the motorcycle. This method depends greatly for its practicality on a preexisting threaded hole in the control pod. If this hole is not present, installation is much more involved. As well, engineering smooth, precise, repeatable action that guarantees overrideability in an emergency has proven challenging with this method. 
         [0011]    Morris and others append mechanical teeth to the fixed portion of the handlebar and to the portion that rotates with the twist-grip, and make provision for selectively engaging them together, locking the twist-grip in position. Morris&#39; inboard side approach presents an uneasy tension between complexity, ugliness and high parts count on one hand, and having to make a profusion of expensive application-specific parts on the other. As well, the approach of interlocking gear teeth requires overrideability to be specifically engineered into the system to a degree not present in the other methods, since gear teeth tend to interlock positively. 
         [0012]    Bronnert, Hunt and others provide a selective frictional engagement between the outboard moving end of the twist-grip and the fixed handlebar. Selective outboard frictional engagement is also employed by the present invention. The application-specific features of the outboard end of the handlebars are typically confined within the perimeter of the end of the grip, so special parts to engage them can be compact, inexpensive, and well-hidden. As well, no space on the handlebar is consumed, a major advantage to the user, as many accessories are best mounted on the handlebar. The biggest challenge of this method are that twist-grips have different amounts of axial play, and different biases as to where they sit within that play, and different ways that grips respond to pressure, so a good mechanism must be able to absorb that play. Hunt and Bronnert have not met this challenge sufficiently. The next challenge of this method is to fully utilize the potential for broad applicability of a twist-grip locking device. Hunt and Bronnert have absolutely not met this challenge, the former confined to hollow bars, the latter to external mounting on bars with modest-size internal threads. 
         [0013]    Sowell, Wilkinson, Van Dyken, Kiser, Fechner and others provide a selective frictional engagement by external clamping action between some inboard portion of the twist-grip assembly, and some portion of the fixed handlebar or control pod. This inboard side approach, as with Morris, presents an uneasy tension between complexity, ugliness and high parts count on one hand, and having to make a profusion of expensive application-specific parts on the other. These units also inevitably take up some axial room on the grip, the throttle sleeve, or the handlebar. 
       BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0014]    The twist-grip control device of the present invention is fixed to the end of a handlebar which has a twist-grip, by means that vary by machine, but are substantially rigid and allow for the user to adjust the clearance between the device and the hand grip during installation. While under way, the user actuates the device by turning the locking collar in the conventional throttle-on direction, counterclockwise viewed from the end of the bar, until the collar&#39;s internal features clear the roll pin on the stationary part of the device, and allow it to be propelled axially by the wave spring, into frictional contact with the handgrip. When the user desires to disengage the device, she takes hold of the locking collar, pulls it away from the twist-grip, and rotates it in the conventional throttle-off direction by ⅛ to ¼ turn, engaging the roll pin with a substantially coaxial cutout internal to the locking collar, which holds said collar away from the twist-grip. As an added safety measure, if circumstances require, the user can turn said collar so far in the throttle-off direction that the roll pin engages a decreasing-radius portion of the said internal cutout in the collar, allowing it to be locked frictionally in a disengaged position. In an emergency, the user simply turns the twist-grip closed, against the holding force, which is limited by the spring force. While the device is engaged, the user can adjust the setting at will by twisting the grip. There is a depression on the grip side of the device capable of receiving a ⅞″ handlebar end inside it. The mounting means, including a number of adjustment shims, an application-specific nose, and adaptors necessary to use the most advantageous diameter of screw, fit against the bottom of said depression, the specific parts necessary depending on application, but the locking device itself remaining the same across many applications. The device is designed so that accessories can be mounted to the outboard side, with a standard mounting pattern. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING 
         [0015]      FIG. 1  is a cutaway view of device in its simplest installation scenario, enveloping bar end to optimize clearance to a handlebar with a threaded hole. Device is in activated position. 
           [0016]      FIG. 2  is a cutaway view of device installed on a handlebar with recessed threads, which is itself recessed into the throttle sleeve. The simplest sort of application-specific nose is shown next to the handlebar internal threads, reaching where the spacers cannot go. Device is in activated position. Note the section indication, the reference for  FIG. 6-8 . 
           [0017]      FIG. 3  is a cutaway view of device installed onto a handlebar with oversize female threads. The large nose screws onto the female threads and a smaller screw attaches device to the nose. Device is in activated position. 
           [0018]      FIG. 4  is a cutaway view of device installed in a hollow handlebar, with elastomeric nose. Device is in activated position. 
           [0019]      FIG. 5  is an exploded view of an assembly with typical components, showing also a typical accessory mount on the end, as an alternate to the basic installation. 
           [0020]      FIG. 6  is a section view of the internal Collar and Mandrel features regulating the motion of the Collar, in the orientation that exists when the device is active. 
           [0021]      FIG. 7  is a section view of the internal Collar and Mandrel features regulating the motion of the Collar, based on  FIG. 6 , with said Collar in an alternate orientation, the most common orientation when the device is inactive. 
           [0022]      FIG. 8  is a section view based on  FIG. 6 , with Collar in an alternate orientation, namely the rotational angle where interference between the Roll Pin and the decreasing radius portion of the Collar cutout locks device frictionally in the inactive position. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0023]    The discussion below refers particularly to the preferred embodiment of the invention, however the invention can be embodied in any number of ways. While the parts are shown with names, it is their function and operation that counts, and the definitions of the words shall not be taken as limiting the scope of the possible embodiments. 
         [0024]    The attached drawings lay out in detail the best embodiment currently contemplated for the invention. 
         [0025]      FIGS. 1-4  show a coarse representation of four different given motorcycle handlebar twist-grip setups, on which the present invention is shown installed. Throttle sleeve  3  is fixed rotatably on handlebar  4 . Grip  2  is typically pressed or clamped or glued to sleeve  3 . These figures illustrate typical embodiments to apply twist-grip lock (# 19 ,  FIG. 5 ) to different situations. 
         [0026]      FIG. 1  shows the simplest application of the present invention. Handlebar  4  protrudes from grip  2  and sleeve  3 , penetrating mandrel  9  to establish required clearance between grip  2  and collar  5 . Handlebar  4  has internal threads  13 , engaged by bolt  10 , which runs through lock washer  11 , mandrel  9 , and shim stack  12 . The number of shims is chosen to minimize clearance between collar  5  and grip  2  in the inactive (unlocked) state. Three shims  12  are depicted in this example. Collar  5  is shown at the rotational angle where actuating cutout  7  is aligned with roll pin  6  assembled into mandrel  9 , and thus sprung into frictional contact with grip  2  by wave spring  8 . 
         [0027]      FIG. 2  shows the present invention applied to a machine whose handlebar  4  is recessed inside sleeve  3 , which is flush with grip  2 , and whose internal threads  13  are recessed inside handlebar  4 . Internal threads  13  are engaged by bolt  10 , which runs through lock washer  11 , mandrel  9 , shim stack  12  and the simplest kind of nose  14   a,  in this case a bushing narrow enough to fit inside handlebar  4  and meet threads  13 . The number of shims  12  is chosen to minimize clearance between collar  5  and grip  2  in the inactive (unlocked) state. Sixteen shims  12  are depicted in this example. Collar  5  is shown at the rotational angle where actuating cutout  7  is aligned with roll pin  6  assembled into mandrel  9 , and thus sprung into frictional contact with grip  2  by wave spring  8 . Note Section view  21 , which is the basis for  FIGS. 6-8 . 
         [0028]      FIG. 3  shows the present invention applied to a machine whose handlebar  4  is recessed inside sleeve  3 , which is recessed inside grip  2 , and whose internal threads  15  are recessed inside handlebar  4 , and of a larger diameter than the largest bolt that can go through mandrel  9 . Internal threads  15  are engaged by nose  14   b,  in this case an adaptor that screws into bar  4  before locking device is attached. Nose  14   b  is engaged by bolt  10 , which runs through lock washer  11 , mandrel  9 , and shim stack  12 . The number of shims  12  is chosen to minimize clearance between collar  5  and grip  2  in the inactive (unlocked) state. Five shims  12  are depicted in this example. Collar  5  is shown at the rotational angle where actuating cutout  7  is aligned with roll pin  6  pressed into mandrel  9 , and thus sprung into frictional contact with grip  2  by wave spring  8 . 
         [0029]      FIG. 4  shows the present invention applied to a machine whose handlebar  4  barely protrudes from sleeve  3 , which is flush with grip  2 . Handlebar  4  has no internal features and is hollow. Nose  14   c  is made of elastic material, and is engaged by a thinner bolt  10 , which runs through lock washer  11 , adaptor  16  for narrower screw, mandrel  9 , shim stack  12  with narrower holes, nose  14 , and flange nut  17 . When tightened, nose  14   c  is squeezed by bolt  10  and nut  17 , and expands against inside of handlebar  4 , holding device (# 19 ,  FIG. 5 ) in place. The number of shims  12  is chosen to minimize clearance between collar  5  and grip  2  in the inactive (unlocked) state. Nine shims  12  are depicted in this example. Collar  5  is shown at the rotational angle where actuating cutout  7  is aligned with roll pin  6  assembled into mandrel  9 , and thus sprung into frictional contact with grip  2  by wave spring  8 . 
         [0030]      FIG. 5  is an exploded view of a general installation. Twist-grip locking device  19  is assembled at factory by pressing roll pin  6  into mandrel  9 , screwing wave spring  8  over roll pin  6  onto mandrel  9 , pressing collar  5  onto mandrel  9  against force of wave spring  8 , then rotating collar  5  in throttle-off direction to engage roll pin  6  with internal collar  5  feature which holds it in place against wave spring  8 . From that point it can be treated as a unit for installation. 
         [0031]    Control pod  1 , grip  2 , throttle sleeve  3  and handlebar  4  are given as part of the motorcycle. Nose  14   b  attaches to handlebar  4  by application-specific means, and twist-grip lock assembly  19  attaches to it with bolt  10 , which passes through lock washer  11 , screw adaptor  16 , mandrel  9 , shim stack  12 , then engaging nose  14   b.  Alternatively, an accessory attachment  18 , in this case clamp-on mirror adaptor, can be inserted between screw adaptor  16  and mandrel  9 . 
         [0032]      FIG. 6  is a section view showing  FIG. 2  Section view  21 , of collar  5  and mandrel  9  features aligned to admit collar  5  over roll pin  6  through actuating cutout  7 , cut into collar  5 . Collar  5  is pushed off mandrel  9  by wave spring  8  (not depicted in this view) and is not retained on mandrel  9  in this condition, unless unit is properly installed to a machine. 
         [0033]      FIG. 7  is a section view based on  FIG. 6 , depicting an alternate position of collar  5 , with collar  5  rotated about 30 degrees so actuating cutout  7 , cut into collar  5 , is no longer aligned with roll pin  6 . Collar  5  is pressed against roll pin  6  by wave spring ( FIG. 2  item  8 ). Collar  5  is retained on mandrel  9  when in this alternate position. 
         [0034]      FIG. 8  is a section view based on  FIG. 6 , depicting an alternate position of collar  5 , with collar  5  rotated until decreasing-radius portion  20  of internal cutout, cut into collar  5 , impacts roll pin  6 , taking up the clearance between mandrel  9  and collar  5 , and establishing a condition of static friction between roll pin  6  and collar  5 . This is the “locked off” condition, which is typically not necessary unless user&#39;s gloves overhang the grip, nudging on collar  5  unintentionally in normal operation of the machine, which can happen with short grips and big hands. Collar  5  is retained on mandrel  9  in this condition. 
         [0035]    Here is how the present invention is used. 
         [0036]    While underway, the user makes the determination that it will take less effort to put a greater force on the throttle only when it needs to be modulated, than to hold it open with a constant but lesser force. This happens where traffic is less, cross traffic minimal, and slowing down is not anticipated. At this point the user moves her hand outboard on the bar until her last finger or two are wrapped around the collar. She then rotates collar in the throttle-on direction, while holding the grip still with her first two fingers and thumb. The collar springs into the end of the twist-grip, holding it still. 
         [0037]    The user is likely to have occasion to adjust her speed, which she will do by forcing the throttle further open or closed in the normal manner, but more forcefully. In an emergency, she forces the throttle shut in the normal manner. 
         [0038]    When the user determines it would be safer or easier to hold the throttle open manually, she holds the collar between her first two fingers and thumb, and pulls it outward while turning in the throttle-off direction. If her hands are bigger than her grips and can rub on the collar and actuate the device accidentally, she can turn the collar till it locks frictionally. 
         [0039]    Here follows a description of how the present invention differs from prior art. 
         [0040]    The present invention is conceived as a safe, simple, beautiful, reasonably easy-to-use means to hold a twist-grip control still during periods when the need to change its setting is not anticipated. The need for such a device became clear in the context of motorcycle touring. During prolonged operation of the machine, the operator&#39;s wrist tires from holding the throttle open against the closing force of the return springs. 
         [0000]    What is required is: 
         [0041]    A means to hold the throttle still, at the discretion of the user, and ideally to release the throttle completely, also at the discretion of the user, without having to tune the device while underway. 
         [0042]    The ideal solution would not be readily noticeable and have a pleasant appearance, to meet modern aesthetics, which strongly favor clean, simple lines. 
         [0043]    From a safety standpoint, the device must never hinder the user in voluntarily shutting the throttle. 
         [0044]    From a business operations standpoint, the device must be made of as few parts as possible, and be applicable to as many different machines as possible. 
         [0045]    From a user standpoint, installation should be unintimidating, requiring minimal modification of the original machine, and minimal skill and time to maintain or adjust. 
         [0046]    The present invention is the only device among the referenced devices which delivers all these factors: 
         [0047]    Positive On/Off operation, unlike Ricardo or Bronnert, whose actuation force develops linearly. 
         [0048]    Both adequate tension and complete release, unlike Wilkinson, and to a higher degree than Bronnert, due to short mechanical travel. 
         [0049]    Inherent overrideability, to a greater degree than Bronnert&#39;s claims that do not involve an automatic release, due to the high spring constant of his O-ring  38 , and unlike Hunt, Morris, Ricardo, Sowell, Van Dyken, though all could be engineered to provide this feature. 
         [0050]    Elegant, simple appearance, unlike Kiser, Wilkinson, Morris. 
         [0051]    Unintimidating or low-stakes installation, unlike Fechner, Morris, Ricardo (unless motorcycle came with a tapped hole already). 
         [0052]    Wide applicability with application-specific fit each time, unlike any of the prior art. 
         [0053]    Low parts count, unlike Bronnert, Fechner, Morris. 
         [0054]    Easy, wide-ranging adjustment, unlike Bronnert, Wilkinson. 
         [0055]    A standard outboard form amenable to mounting diverse accessories, unlike any of the prior art. 
         [0056]    The closest prior art is Bronnert. The present invention has in common with Bronnert that it mounts to the bar end, that the user manipulation to engage the device is a rotation in the throttle-on direction, and that the motion of the engaging member as it engages the twist-grip is axial. Both units also act by pressing the twist-grip assembly through its axial play and into the control pod, until sufficient resistance is encountered to frictionally engage something on the end of the twist-grip assembly. 
         [0057]    The differences are far more numerous. Bronnert (per his claim  5 ) continuously modulates holding force with “rotatable means . . . for moving the bearing housing selectively into engagement with the hand grip . . . ” The present invention uses a collar that is rotatable to allow or disallow its own linear movement to engage the twist-grip, but the rotary movement is not directly linked to the linear movement, indeed the rotary movement and the linear movement of engagement cannot happen simultaneously. Rather, it is the wave spring that presses the collar linearly into the twist-grip. The rotation of the collar merely allows it to happen. Bronnert&#39;s actuation is rotation both to actuate and to retract. The present invention has the collar rotate to release the wave spring, but retraction involves both rotary and linear motion of the collar. 
         [0058]    The use of the wave spring to generate holding force in on/off fashion is the core of the advantages of greater overrideability and a greater effective range of linear travel as installed. This is due to the low spring constant of the wave spring guaranteeing both a low maximum holding force and a slow decay in holding force as the collar travels further toward the twist-grip. Bronnert&#39;s ramps and balls might allow around 0.1″ travel, which is within the range of axial play expected from a twist-grip assembly, opening the possibility of there being no way to adjust it to both adequately hold and completely release the twist-grip. Whereas Bronnert&#39;s shims or o-rings can be changed to affect sleeve clearance to throttle sleeve within a range up to maybe 0.2″, the present invention can operate over a travel of about 0.2″, and collar clearance can be adjusted within a range of 0.65″, depending on application, and in many applications unit can operate with the handlebar end buried in the device, which Bronnert&#39;s unit cannot duplicate. Additionally, changing Bronnert&#39;s o-ring or shimming it requires breaking the seal of numerous o-rings and exposing the user to grease or oil coating the internal parts. The present invention adjusts clearance without opening the device, runs without lubrication, and can be disassembled without tools, washed in the sink and reassembled and installed wet with no ill effect. 
         [0059]    Since the mandrel of the present invention is fixed rotationally and constitutes the end of the device, and since there is room for a screw adaptor in the counterbore on the end, a user can mount accessories that interface with the mandrel in the same way as the screw adaptor. Bronnert&#39;s device has a rotating cap which is also the outboard face of his device, so any accessory mounted to it would rotate whenever his device was adjusted, which would be undesirable for most accessories. The final advantage of the present invention is the low parts count. Whereas Bronnert&#39;s unit has approximately fourteen moving parts, five proprietary parts and eighteen bought parts, nine of them unique, the present invention in a similarly complex application has two moving parts, three proprietary parts and four bought parts, all unique.