Abstract:
The present invention describes a method and apparatus for resolving anomalies within a network topology map that typically occur when a derived topology map fails, for a variety of reasons, to include devices resident on the network. The method of the present invention discovers missing devices by identifying a conflicting link within a received topology map, the conflicting link comprising a source and one or more conflicting destinations. The conflicting link is resolved through the use of one or more virtual devices within the topology map. The conflicting link is replaced with a link to a virtual device based upon the resolution of the conflicting link, thereby eliminating the anomaly in the topology map. The step of resolving the conflicting link may also comprise the steps of determining a number of conflicting destinations from the source of the conflicting link, resolving the source of the conflicting link, and resolving the conflicting destination. In order to reduce the number of virtual devices inserted to the topology, the method may further include identifying a link between two virtual devices and merging the virtual devices.

Description:
COPYRIGHT NOTICE 
     A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention disclosed herein relates generally to systems and methods for determining the topology of computer networks. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods for identifying and resolving missing devices in a topology of a computer network. 
     There are many existing systems for determining the topology features of a network. Topology is generally concerned with the physical interconnections between devices in a computer network. This is referred to as Layer  2  or the Data Link Layer, which is one of several layers comprising the multi-layered communication model known as Open Systems Interconnection (OSI). In a network, devices may redirect data messages at the layer  2  level using the destination Media Access Control Address to determine where to direct the message. The Data Link Layer ensures that an initial connection has been achieved between devices, divides output data into frames, and handles the acknowledgements from a receiver that the data arrived successfully. A switch is one example of a Layer  2  device. 
     Examining the address of neighboring nodes on a network may also be used to derive the topology features of a network. This is referred to as Layer  3 , or the Network Layer, of the OSI model. Layer  3  is concerned with knowing the address of the neighboring nodes in a network, selecting routes based thereupon, and providing quality of service. A router is an example of a Layer  3  device, although some newer switches perform Layer  3  functions, and the Internet Protocol address is a Layer  3  address. 
     Examining the devices attached to each port of a device derives Layer  2  topology.  FIG. 1  presents the Layer  2  topology of an exemplary network comprised of devices A  102 , B  104 , C  108 , and D  106 . Each device on the network (link domain) has two ports, each connected to a port on another device. Layer  2  devices are identified by a Media Access Control (MAC) address. The MAC address is imprinted on a network controller at the point of manufacture, and is associated with each port on a device. These physical interconnections, identified by source and destination MAC addresses, are recorded in a master link table the stores the source name, source port, destination name, and destination port. Table 1, which follows, presents the master link table for the network presented in  FIG. 1 : 
                                 TABLE 1               Source name   Source port   Destination name   Destination port                   A   1   B   1       A   2   D   1       B   1   A   1       B   2   C   2       C   2   B   2       C   1   D   2       D   2   C   1       D   1   A   2                    
Using the master link table presented above in Table 1, existing topology systems are capable of constructing a graphical representation of the network&#39;s topology ( FIG. 1 ). Similar techniques are also available for deriving network topology through utilizing Layer  3  data.
 
     While it is know in the art to obtain the topology features using Layer  2  and Layer  3  addresses, existing topology systems and methods fail to account for situations where knowledge of a network is missing. This can occur for a variety of reasons. For example, incorrectly configuring the security settings of a device may result in the device not responding to a variety of requests. Likewise, the device may not support the discovery mechanism being employed by the topographer or the device may be owned by a third party who has denied access to the discovery features of the device. 
     Systems that do not recognize the existence of missing devices when deriving the topology of a network result in topologies containing anomalies. By identifying when there are missing devices on a network and removing the anomalies associated with them, systems that subsequently use the topology can be simplified. Without accounting for anomalies, subsequent system must necessarily be more complex as they must provide for business logic to handle the exceptional cases caused by the anomalies. Furthermore, by identifying missing devices it is possible to alert a user to the issue, enabling the problem to be manually addressed if the situation requires it. 
     An exemplary network topology containing anomalies, as discussed above, is presented in  FIG. 2 . The network comprises a plurality of devices,  202 ,  204 ,  206 ,  208 ,  210 ,  212 ,  214 . Each line represents the physical interconnections between ports of the devices, e.g., between  210  and  214  and between  210  and  208 . An anomaly is generated when a device  202  is depicted based on retrieved or generated topology data as being physically connected to two distinct devices,  204  and  206 , over a single port. The topology may be broken down into sub-topologies  216  wherein each sub-topology represents a domain of Layer  2  devices. By limiting the scope of analysis to a sub-topology, or interconnection between two or more sup-topologies, the task of identifying missing devices is simplified. 
     Although a number of techniques have been developed to determine devices missing from a network topology, they all have significant drawbacks. U.S. Pat. No. 5,708,772, entitled “Network Topology Determination by Dissecting Unitary Connections and Detecting Non-responsive Nodes”, presents a solution to determine missing Layer  2  devices whereby every Layer  2  device that traverses an unknown device needs to be aware of every other device connected to the unknown device. For example, assume the following topology presented in Table 2, comprising devices A, B, C, and D, where device B is an unknown device: 
                     TABLE 2                                                                  
According to the system and method described, device A must be aware of devices C and D. Similarly, device D must be aware of devices A and C. Furthermore, transitive links must be identified and resolved in order for the system and method to function properly, e.g., if device C is further connected to device E, then device A must be aware of device E. This, however, is not always the case, which has the potential to result in erroneous topologies being generated.
 
     Another solution to the problem has been proposed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,926,462, entitled “Method of Determining Topology Features of a Network of Objects Which Compares the Similarity of the Traffic Sequences/Volumes of a Pair of Devices”. According to this method, topology is derived by analyzing traffic profiles; changes in profiles reflect changes in topology. Unfortunately, this method requires constant monitoring of traffic patterns over an extended period of time, unnecessarily consuming network resources. 
     There is thus a need for a system and method to identify and resolve missing devices in a network topology. The invention described herein adopts an approach of identifying and resolving the anomalies by inserting a “virtual device” into the topology to represent the missing device. The system and method of the present invention further reduces the number of such virtual devices and ensures that no anomalies exist between the virtual devices themselves. 
     BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is operative to provide a data structure populated with data representing the physical links between devices in a computer network, the data representing devices missing from a received topology map with virtual devices. 
     The present invention provides a system and method for determining devices missing from a topology map without requiring each device to have any knowledge of the network. 
     The present invention further provides for virtual ports on a virtual device, each port allocated to an individual device connecting to the virtual device. 
     In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a method is provided for resolving anomalies within a network topology map. The method includes identifying a conflicting link within a received topology map, the conflicting link comprising a source and one or more conflicting destinations, resolving the conflicting link through the use of one or more virtual devices within the topology map, and replacing the conflicting link with a link to a virtual device based upon the resolution of the conflicting link. 
     In some embodiments, resolving the conflicting link involves resolving the source of the conflicting link and resolving the conflicting destination. In further embodiments, identifying the conflicting link involves locating two or more entries in a link table showing the source to be linked to two or more different destinations. Entries in the link table having the same source may be grouped together into a conflict group. Replacing the conflicting link with a link to the virtual device may involve removing the conflicting link from the link table and inserting the link to the virtual device in a virtual link table. The method may further involve generating a virtual link table for storing one or more links to virtual devices. 
     Resolving the conflicting link may involve first determining whether the source or a destination in the conflicting link is linked to a first virtual device and replacing the conflicting link with a link to a virtual device only if neither the source nor a destination is linked to the first virtual device. Determining whether the source or destination is linked to a virtual device may involve first determining whether the source is linked to a virtual device then determining whether a destination in the conflicting link is linked to a virtual device. If the source is linked to a first virtual device, the source is replaced with the first virtual device. If a destination in the conflicting link is linked to a first virtual device, a link is created from the source to the first virtual device if the source in the conflicting link is not a virtual device. 
     In alternative embodiments, other resolution sequences may be used to resolve conflicting links. For example, devices may be traversed in any given sequence and decisions made based on any unresolved source and destination conflict whether to insert a virtual link to a virtual device. Since virtual devices are merged at the end of the process, the resulting virtual links to virtual devices should come out substantially or exactly the same. However, certain analysis sequences such as those described herein are more efficient, require fewer iterations and achieve the resulting virtual link table more quickly than others. 
     In accordance with further embodiments of the present invention, a computer readable medium is provided for storing a data structure representing a virtual link table. The data structure contains one or more entries showing a link between a source device in a network and a first virtual device, the source device being identified in a received topology map of a network and the first virtual device not being identified in the received topology map. The data structure further contains one or more entries showing a link between a destination device in the network and the first virtual device, the destination device being identified in the received topology map. The virtual link table data structure is used by an executable program to display an improved topology map of the network. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, in which like references are intended to refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which: 
         FIG. 1  is a block diagram presenting a topology map comprising several devices and the interconnections therebetween identified by port number; 
         FIG. 2  is a block diagram presenting a topology map comprising a sub-topology containing an anomaly; 
         FIGS. 3   a  through  3   c  are a series of block diagrams presenting a topology map comprising a plurality of anomalies and the use of a virtual device to resolve the anomalies, according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 4  is a flow diagram presenting a high-level view of a method for resolving anomalies in a topology map according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 5  is a flow diagram presenting a method for resolving conflicting links in a topology map, according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 6  is a flow diagram presenting a method for resolving the source link domain and port at an anomalous point in a topology map according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 7  is a flow diagram presenting a method for resolving the destination link domain and port at an anomalous point in a topology map according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 8  is a flow diagram presenting a method for creating a new virtual port on a virtual device according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 9  is a flow diagram presenting a method for entering data into a virtual conversion table according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 10  is a flow diagram presenting a method for creating a virtual device according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 11  is a flow diagram presenting a method for inserting a link into a virtual link table according to one embodiment of the present invention; and 
         FIG. 12  is a flow diagram presenting a method for inserting a link into a main link table according to one embodiment of the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     With reference to  FIGS. 3   a  through  12 , preferred embodiments of the instant invention are presented. The present invention comprises a computer system, comprising a programmable microprocessor and executing software to execute the methods for determining missing devices from a network topology. A block diagram presenting the modifications made to a topology map received by a programmable microprocessor executing methods of the instant invention is present in  FIGS. 3   a  through  3   c.  An exemplary system and method for generating a topology map for use with the present invention is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,702 (“the &#39;702 patent”), entitled “Method and Apparatus for Determining Accurate Topology Features of a Network”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. 
     Turning to  FIG. 3   a,  the network comprises a number of anomalies in that each device is reported as having two devices connected to single port, e.g., Device D, port  2   208  is connected to Device C, port  2   306  and Device A, port  1   302 . Table 3 presents the main link table for this anomalous topology: 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Source name 
                 Source port 
                 Destination name 
                 Destination port 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 A 
                 1 
                 B 
                 1 
               
               
                 A 
                 1 
                 D 
                 2 
               
               
                 B 
                 1 
                 A 
                 1 
               
               
                 B 
                 1 
                 C 
                 2 
               
               
                 C 
                 2 
                 B 
                 1 
               
               
                 C 
                 2 
                 D 
                 2 
               
               
                 D 
                 2 
                 C 
                 2 
               
               
                 D 
                 2 
                 A 
                 1 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Each anomaly is resolved by ensuring that each port comprises at most one connection. This is achieved through the use of a virtual device  310 . The direct connection from Device B  304  to both Device A  302  and Device C  306  is resolved by generating a virtual device, which comprises one or more virtual ports, and linking Device B, port  1   304  with port  1  of the virtual device  310 . The method further determines that because all communication to Device B flows through Device V  310 , links must be generated to Device B  304  via Device V  310 . Virtual ports  2  and  3  are generated on the virtual device  310 , and linked to Device A, port  1   302  and Device C, port  2   306 , respectively. 
     At this point of the process, a virtual link table has been generated in memory of the computer system and entries have been generated to track the links between the virtual device  310  and devices A  302 , B  304 , and C  306 . Table 4 presents a link table representing the present topology: 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Source name 
                 Source port 
                 Destination name 
                 Destination port 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 B 
                 1 
                 V 
                 1 
               
               
                 A 
                 1 
                 V 
                 2 
               
               
                 A 
                 2 
                 D 
                 2 
               
               
                 C 
                 2 
                 V 
                 3 
               
               
                 C 
                 2 
                 D 
                 2 
               
               
                 D 
                 2 
                 A 
                 1 
               
               
                 D 
                 2 
                 C 
                 2 
               
               
                 V 
                 1 
                 B 
                 1 
               
               
                 V 
                 2 
                 A 
                 1 
               
               
                 V 
                 3 
                 C 
                 2 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     As shown by  FIG. 3   b,  the addition of a virtual device  310 , and the generation of three virtual ports, resolves the topology anomaly between Devices A  302 , B  304  and C  306 .  FIG. 3   c  presents the completion of the modifications to be made to the topology map to resolve all anomalies. A fourth virtual port is generated on the virtual device  310  and linked to Device D, port  2   308 . With the addition of this link, all anomalies have been removed from the topology map and the missing device  310  is determined to be a device with four ports facilitating communication between Devices A  302 , B  304 , C  306 , and D  308 . The main link table for this topology is presented below in Table 5: 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Source name 
                 Source port 
                 Destination name 
                 Destination port 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 A 
                 1 
                 V 
                 2 
               
               
                 B 
                 1 
                 V 
                 1 
               
               
                 C 
                 2 
                 V 
                 3 
               
               
                 D 
                 2 
                 V 
                 4 
               
               
                 V 
                 1 
                 B 
                 1 
               
               
                 V 
                 2 
                 A 
                 1 
               
               
                 V 
                 3 
                 C 
                 2 
               
               
                 V 
                 4 
                 D 
                 2 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     A method of the present invention, intended to be executed by a program running on a computer system comprising a programmable microprocessor, is presented in the high-level flow diagram of  FIG. 4 . The method starts, step  402 , by obtaining a topology map of the network, step  404 . Although many techniques may be used to derive the topology map required by step  404 , one embodiment contemplates deriving a topology map according to the &#39;702 patent, which has previously been incorporated by reference. 
     The topology map is analyzed to obtain a list of all conflicting links in the topology map, step  406 . For a link to be conflicting, a source must have two or more links in the link table. The links for a given source (device and port) are considered conflicting if they have different destinations. This follows from the observation that a link represents a physical connection between two ports. It is not possible for a port to be connected to more than one port simultaneously. Therefore, if a port is connected to more than one port there is a device missing from the topology. 
     All the conflicting links are resolved to eliminate anomalies, step  408 . A virtual device is used to represent either a single missing device, one or more directly connected missing devices, or a broadcast media. A virtual device links table is generated as a temporary table to hold links between source and destination to the virtual devices. As will be explained in greater detail herein, it is determined which links must be replaced with links to the virtual device and entries are created in the virtual devices links table. All conflicting links are removed from the main link table, step  410 , thereby removing all anomalies from the topography, and replaced with entries from the virtual device links table. In this manner, missing devices are now represented in the topography as one or more virtual devices, as well as the ports on the virtual device physically connected to other nodes (devices) in the network. 
       FIG. 5  comprises the routine executed to complete step  408  presented in  FIG. 1 : resolve all conflicting links. The subroutine begins, step  502 , with an examination of the topography map to determine if there are any conflicting links in the topology that must be resolved, step  504 . Where additional links require resolution, the next conflicting port is retrieved from the master link table, step  506 . According to other embodiments, the next conflicting link is determined by examining the topology map itself. The current source port is set to the next conflicting port, step  508 . 
     The current source and destination ports are resolved, steps  510  and  512  respectively. Because each conflicting destination occupies a distinct record in the master link table, each must be individually resolved. Program flow returns to step  504  where a determination is once again made to ascertain whether or not additional conflicting links need to be resolved, step  504 . The process is repeated until all conflicting links are resolved and the routine ends, step  516 . 
     Within the context of the routine to resolve all conflicting links contained within the topology map,  FIG. 5 , a subroutine is entered at step  510 , presented in  FIG. 6 , to resolve the source link domain and port. The subroutine starts, step  602 , and a check is performed to determine if a virtual link table exists, step  604 . The virtual link table is a temporary table generated in a memory of the computer system, e.g., transient or persistent memory systems typically integrated with computer systems, and is used to keep track of links from discovered network devices to a virtual device or devices that represent a device or devices missing from the topology received at step  404  in  FIG. 4 . Where the subroutine is executed for the first time, the virtual link table does not exist, step  604 , so it must be created and stored in memory, step  606 . The table is created, step  606 , and the subroutine exits, step  614 , returning control to the parent or calling routine. 
     On successive iterations of the subroutine of  FIG. 6 , the virtual link table has been created during a previous iteration, and the check performed at step  604  returns true. The virtual link table is examined, step  608 , in an attempt to identify the link domain port previously set as the current source port in step  508  of  FIG. 5 . A check is performed on the lookup results to determine if a virtual device exists that is connected to the current source port, step  610 . If no such virtual device exists, the subroutine exits, step  614 , returning control to the parent or calling routine. Where a virtual device exists that is connected to the current source port, step  610 , the current source port is set to the port on the virtual device to which the current source port is connected, step  612 , and the subroutine exits, step  614 , returning control to the parent or calling routine. 
     Control returns to the calling routine presented in  FIG. 5  with processing continuing to step  512 . The subroutine executed to resolve the conflicting destination link domain and port, step  512 , is presented in  FIG. 7 . The subroutine begins, step  702 , and an initial check is performed, step  704 , to determine if any more conflicting destination links are present in the topology map. Where conflicting destination ports exist, the current destination port is set to be the next conflicting destination port from the set of conflicting destination ports, step  706 . The virtual link table is examined in an attempt to identify the current destination link from the set of links comprising the virtual link table, step  708 . 
     If an entry does not exist in the virtual link table for the current destination, step  710 , a check is performed to determine if the device set as the current source is a virtual device, step  712 . Where the current source is not a virtual device, step  712 , a virtual device is created, step  710 . Regardless of whether the current source is a virtual device, step  712 , a link is inserted in the virtual link table from the device and port identified as the current source to the device and port identified as the current destination, step  716 . Program flow returns to step  704  and the set of conflicting destination links is examined to determine if additional conflicting destination links exist. 
     Returning to step  710 , a check is performed to determine if an entry for the device and port identified as the current destination exists in the virtual link table, step  710 . Where an entry exists for the current destination, step  710 , a temporary entry is set in the virtual link table for the virtual device, step  718 . Another check is performed, step  720 , to establish whether the device and port set as the current source is a virtual device. If the current device is a virtual device, step  720 , an entry is made in the virtual device conversion table recording the current source and the current destination, step  722 . According to this situation, both the current source and the current destination are virtual devices. As will be explained in greater detail herein, the virtual device conversion table is used to record links between virtual devices for later merging or elimination of unnecessary or redundant virtual devices. 
     Where the current source is not a virtual device, step  720 , a new virtual port is created on the virtual device and the temporary virtual link entry created in step  718  is updated to record the current source as the source for the virtual link entry, step  724 . The virtual device is now used as the current source and program flow returns to step  704  where the set of conflicting destination links is examined to determine if any additional ones exist. The process is repeated until all the destination links are resolved, and the subroutine ends, step  726 . Program flow returns to the calling routine, step  504  in  FIG. 5 . 
     In the process of executing the subroutine presented in  FIG. 7  to resolve the conflicting links contained in the topography map, several additional subroutines are called. The first of these subroutines is presented in  FIG. 8 , and is called when program flow reaches step  714  and a new virtual device is required. The subroutine of  FIG. 8  begins, step  802 , and a new virtual device is created in the memory of the computer system executing the routine, step  804 . A link is entered into the virtual link table recording a connection between the current source and the virtual device, step  806 . The newly created virtual device is set to be the current device, step  808 , and the subroutine exits, step  810 , returning control to the calling routine. 
     Program control returns to step  714  in  FIG. 7  and continues with step  716 , the subroutine of which is presented in  FIG. 9 . The subroutine presented in  FIG. 9  is used to insert a link into the virtual link table from the device identified as the current source to the device identified as the current destination. The subroutine begins, step  902 , and a new virtual port is created on the current source, step  904 , which by definition of the program flow must be a virtual device. A entry is created in the virtual link table from the current destination to the current source, step  906 , and the subroutine completes, step  908 , with control being passed to the calling routine. 
     Turning once again to  FIG. 7 , a check is performed at step  720  to determine if the current source is a virtual device. Where the current device is not a virtual device, program flow is directed to step  724 , at which point the subroutine presented in  FIG. 10  is executed to create a new virtual port and assign it as the current source for the temporary virtual link entry. The subroutine begins, step  1002 , and a new virtual port is created and recorded in the virtual link table as a destination port within the temporary virtual link entry, step  1006 . Inserting a link from the current source to the destination virtual port completes the entry, which is recorded in the temporary virtual link entry in the virtual link table, step  1006 . The virtual port assigned as the destination port on the temporary virtual link entry is set to be the current source, step  1008 , and the subroutine ends, step  1010 , passing control back to the calling routine. 
     The final subroutine called by the routine presented in  FIG. 7 , presented in  FIG. 11 , is executed at step  722  to record connections between virtual devices for later resolution to eliminate unnecessary or redundant virtual devices. The subroutine begins, step  1102 , and assigns two variable names to hold the two virtual link entries, step  1104 . In this embodiment of the invention, a variable named “Primary” is used to hold the lower of the temporary virtual link entries and a variable named “Secondary” is used to hold the higher of the temporary virtual link entries, however, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other variable names could also be used. The subroutine then looks up “Secondary” in the virtual device conversion table, step  1106 , to see if an entry for “Secondary” exists in the virtual device conversion table, step  1108 . If an entry for “Secondary” does not exist, then the subroutine puts conversion from “Secondary” to “Primary” in the virtual device conversion table, step  1110 , and the subroutine ends, step  1122 , passing control back to the calling routine. If an entry for “Secondary” does exist in the virtual device conversion table, then the subroutine checks if the convert entry “to” field is same as “Primary”, step  1112 . If the convert entry “to” field is same as “Primary”, then the subroutine determines that this entry is a duplicate entry with no change needed, step  1114 , and the subroutine ends, step  1122 , passing control back to the calling routine. If the convert entry “to” field is not the same as “Primary”, then the subroutine checks if “Primary” is lower than the convert entry “to” field, step  1116 . If “Primary” is lower than the convert entry “to” field, then the subroutine puts conversion from “Primary” to the convert entry “to” field in the virtual device link table, step  1118 , and the subroutine ends, step  1122 , passing control back to the calling routine. If “Primary” is not lower than the convert entry “to” field, then the subroutine puts conversion from the convert entry “to” field to “Primary”, and the subroutine ends, step  1122 , passing control back to the calling routine. 
     An exemplary virtual device conversion table generated by the instant subroutine, illustrating the interconnection between four virtual devices, is presented in Table 6 as follows: 
     
       
         
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 6 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 From 
                 To 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
                 virtual device 2 
                 virtual device 1 
               
               
                   
                 virtual device 3 
                 virtual device 1 
               
               
                   
                 virtual device 5 
                 virtual device 4 
               
               
                   
                 virtual device 6 
                 virtual device 4 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The final steps in the high level process of resolving ambiguities contained within a topology, presented in  FIG. 4 , concerns deleting conflicting links and replacing them with resolved links to virtual devices, steps  410  and  412 . These steps are accomplished through the routine presented in  FIG. 12 . The routine starts, step  1202 , and an initial check is performed to ascertain whether any entries are left in the virtual link table for inclusion in the main link table, step  1204 . If entries remain in the virtual link table, step  1204 , the next entry is retrieved from the table, step  1206 . 
     The next entry is retrieved, step  1206 , and a check is performed to determine if the retrieved entry comprises a virtual device, step  1208 . Where a virtual device is contained in the entry retrieved from the virtual link table, steps  1206  and  1208 , the virtual conversion table is examined to determine if the source is contained therein, step  1210 . Where the source device is listed in the conversion table, step  1212 , a conversion is performed to convert the source retrieved from the virtual link table to a new source based on the data contained in the conversion table, step  1214 . Regardless of whether the source is contained within the virtual conversion table, step  1212 , the resolved link is inserted into the main link table and replaces the link previously contained within the main link table, step  1222 . 
     Turning back to step  1208 , where a virtual device is not contained in the entry retrieved from the virtual link table, program flow is directed to step  1216 . The virtual conversion table is examined to determine if the destination port is contained therein, step  1216 . Where the destination device is listed in the conversion table, step  1218 , a conversion is performed to convert the destination retrieved from the virtual link table to a new destination based on the data contained in the conversion table, step  1220 . Regardless of whether the destination is contained within the virtual conversion table, step  1212 , the resolved link is inserted into the main link table and replaces the link previously contained within the main link table, step  1222 . Program flow returns to step  1204  and a check is performed to ascertain whether any additional entries exist in the virtual link table for inclusion in the main link table. When all entries have been resolved, the routine exits, step  1224 . Upon resolving the entries recorded in the virtual link table through the methods presented above, a resultant topology map is produced whereby anomalies contained within the map are eliminated. 
     While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many variations and modifications as will be evident to those skilled in this art may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and the invention is thus not to be limited to the precise details of methodology or construction set forth above as such variations and modification are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.