Abstract:
A method implemented in a user equipment (UE) used in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) wireless communications system supporting coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT) is disclosed. The method includes measuring reference signal received power (RSRP), transmitting, to a network, first feedback on the RSRP, receiving, from the network, a CoMP measurement set, conducting pre-scheduling CoMP UE fallback according to the CoMP measurement set, computing channel quality and direction information according to a UE category, and transmitting, to the network, second feedback on the channel quality and direction information. Other methods, apparatuses, and systems also are disclosed.

Description:
[0001]    This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/617,854, entitled “Effective Feedback and Scheduling for Cooperative Joint Transmission in Multi-Cell OFDMA Systems,” filed on Mar. 30, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    The present invention relates to coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT) in orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) for a wireless communications system and more particularly to feedback and scheduling for CoMP JT in OFDMA. 
         [0003]    Coordinated multi-point (CoMP) transmission, being standardized in Third Generation Partnership Project Long Term Evolution Advanced (3GPP LTE-Advanced), allows multi-cell cooperative processing to mitigate inter-cell interference (ICI) and the system to operate at higher effective signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINRs). Joint transmission (JT) CoMP transmission increases the user throughput especially cell edge users by jointly coordinating the transmission or receptions of user signals from multiple cooperating transmission points (TP). 
         [0004]    The benefits of JT CoMP come at the cost of increased radio feedback and backhaul overhead. In addition, CoMP JT performance highly depends on the scheduling algorithms. 
         [0005]    We proposes efficient feedback schemes with reduced signaling overhead and efficient scheduling algorithm. Based on the proposed feedback and scheduling, CoMP JT achieves significant cell-edge throughput gain over single cell transmission at the cost of much reduced feedback overhead and backhaul overhead. 
         [0006]    There are some related works [1]-[5] in this field. Existing feedback [1] involves very high feedback overhead. The CoMP JT scheduling proposed in [2] involves high complexity due to the iterative design. The performance of the scheduling is not guaranteed with a sub-optimal solution.
   [1] S. Brueck, L. Zhao, J. Giese, and M. Amin, “Centralized scheduling for joint transmission coordinated multi-point in lte-advanced,” in Smart Antennas (WSA), 2010 International ITG Workshop on, February 2010, pp. 177-184.   [2] L. Thiele, V. Jungnickel, and T. Haustein, “Interference management for future cellular ofdma systems using coordinated multi-point transmission,” IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E93-B, no. 12, pp. 3228-3237, 2010.   [3] Coordinated multi-point operation for LTE physical layer aspects (Release 11), 3GPP Std. 3GPP TR 36.819, Rev. 11.0, 2011.   [4] LG Electronics, Motorola Mobility, et, al “Proposal for UE receiver assumption in CoMP simulations, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 R1-110586, 2011.   [5] Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects, 3GPP Std. 3GPP TR 36.814, Rev. 9.0, 2010.   
 
         [0012]    In [1] and [2], the CoMP JT scheduling algorithm either applies greedy suboptimal scheme or involves iterative scheme, which has very complexity without a performance guarantee. [3] defines the CoMP feedback for JT, in which coherent phase difference information is considered. [5] defines the CQI/PMI/RI feedback format without giving the method to compute them. 
         [0013]    We propose and investigate different feedback schemes with lower signaling overhead such as non-coherent JT and pre-scheduling CoMP user equipment (UE) fallback (PSCUF). With non-coherent JT, no phase adjustment feedback is needed for joint transmission. With PSCUF, a scheme dynamically allowing a CoMP UE to skip CoMP feedback and fallback to single cell transmission is enabled to reduce feedback overhead and maintain the throughput advantage of JT. Based on the proposed feedback option, we develop an optimal scheduling algorithm to achieve CoMP gain at a lower complexity. 
       BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0014]    An objective is to provide effective feedback and/or scheduling for coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT) in orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) for a wireless communications system. 
         [0015]    An aspect of the disclosure includes a method implemented in a user equipment (UE) used in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) wireless communications system supporting coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT). The method includes measuring reference signal received power (RSRP), transmitting, to a network, first feedback on the RSRP, receiving, from the network, a CoMP measurement set, conducting pre-scheduling CoMP UE fallback according to the CoMP measurement set, computing channel quality and direction information according to a UE category, and transmitting, to the network, second feedback on the channel quality and direction information. 
         [0016]    Another aspect of the disclosure includes a method implemented in an network used in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) wireless communications system supporting coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT). The method includes receiving, from a user equipment (UE), first feedback on reference signal received power (RSRP), determining a CoMP measurement set according to the first feedback, transmitting, to the UE, the CoMP measurement set, receiving, from the UE, second feedback on channel quality and direction information, and scheduling CoMP JT according to the second feedback. 
         [0017]    Still another aspect of the disclosure includes a method implemented in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) wireless communications system supporting coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT). The method includes measuring reference signal received power (RSRP), transmitting, from a user equipment (UE) to a network, first feedback on the RSRP, determining a CoMP measurement set according to the first feedback, transmitting, from the network to the UE, the CoMP measurement set, conducting pre-scheduling CoMP UE fallback according to the CoMP measurement set, computing channel quality and direction information according to a UE category, transmitting, from the UE to the network, second feedback on channel quality and direction information, and scheduling CoMP JT according to the second feedback. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0018]      FIG. 1  depicts a homogenous CoMP network with M=3 macrocell base stations (BSs). 
           [0019]      FIG. 2  depicts a heterogeneous CoMP network with 1 Macro cell and M remote radio heads (RRHs). 
           [0020]      FIG. 3  depicts feedback and scheduling for CoMP JT transmission and reception. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0021]    Our proposed feedback schemes and scheduling algorithm for CoMP-JT can have the following advantages and competitive and/or commercial values as follows: 
         [0022]    (1) The proposed pre-scheduling CoMP UE fallback (PSCUF) scheme reduces feedback overhead. 
         [0023]    (2) The proposed non-coherent JT (without phase adjustment feedback) reduces feedback overhead. 
         [0024]    (3) The proposed scheduling algorithm achieves a guaranteed performance at low complexity. 
         [0025]    (4) The proposed pre-scheduling CoMP UE fallback (PSCUF) increases cell-edge UE throughput. 
         [0026]    (5) The proposed scheme can be easily extended to multi-user (MU-) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) CoMP JT. 
         [0027]    1. System Description 
         [0028]    We consider a cluster of M TPs with a total K user equipments (UEs) within the cluster. There are N available physical resource blocks (PRBs) in cluster that are available for resource allocation. We assume a centralized scheduler which allocates the PRB resources and transmission formats (transmit precoding matrices, modulations and coding rates) to the users within the cluster in order to optimize the cluster weighted sum rate. The input of the scheduler consists of the available PRBs and the users&#39; channel quality information including a channel quality index (CQI), a precoding matrix index (PMI), and a rank index (RI) fed back to the network from the K UEs within the cluster. 
         [0029]    The CoMP network could be a homogeneous network consisting of all macro-cell BSs, i.e., homogeneous network  100 , as shown in  FIG. 1  or heterogeneous network (HetNet)  200  which is mixture of macro-cell BSs  208  and lower power RRHs  210  and  212  as shown in  FIG. 2 . 
         [0030]    We consider the heterogeneous network (HetNet) as shown in  FIG. 2 . For simplicity, we consider single-user (SU) joint-transmission (JT) CoMP scheme, in which maximally only one UE can be scheduled for any resource element (RE) within the cluster. Thus, the UE will experience only the co-channel interference from the TPs outside its CoMP cooperating set. 
         [0031]    2. Flow Chart of Proposed Feedback Schemes, Scheduling Module and Transmit/Receive Flow 
         [0032]      FIG. 3  represents proposed feedback schemes, scheduling module and the transmit/receive flow of CoMP JT. 
         [0033]    At each UE, reference signal received power (RSRP) is measured in block  301  and fed back to the network and more specifically to a base station or eNodeB. The network determines a CoMP measurement set for each UE and signals the set to the UE in block  302 , based on the feedback. Whether a UE is CoMP UE or non-CoMP UE is determined at this step. A step called pre-scheduling CoMP UE fallback (PSCUF) is then conducted, in block  303 , where a CoMP UE falls back to non-CoMP UE (single cell transmission) if the measured CoMP aggregated SINR has no gain over single-cell per point SINR. The channel quality and direction information (e.g. CQI, PMI, RI, etc.) is then computed in block  304 , based on the UE categories such as CoMP UE or non-CoMP UE. The CQI/PMI/RI is then fed back to the network in block  305  as the input of the scheduler. The proposed scheduling in block  306  has the output of at least one of CoMP UE allocation in block  308 , a CoMP cooperating set in block  307 , and a transmission format in block  309 . The CoMP JT transmission in block  310  and reception in block  311  are then performed based on the scheduling scheme and feedback options. 
         [0034]    3. Feedback for CoMP Joint Transmission with Lower Signaling Overhead 
         [0035]    We assume an implicit channel state information (CSI) feedback scheme where feedback of a transmission format (e.g. CQI, PMI, RI, etc.) derived using hypotheses of different transmission and reception processing is performed for all the UEs within the CoMP measurement set. Each UE is classified as a CoMP UE or non-CoMP UE in a semi-static manner based on long-term SINR measurements in the form of reference signal receive power (RSRP). 
         [0036]    3.1 CSI Feedback for CoMP-JT 
         [0037]    For CoMP UE k with the size of its CoMP measurement set larger than one, the feedback contains, for example, at least one of (1) a rank-1 PMI for each TP in its measurement set Vk, (2) one aggregate CQI computed assuming SU joint transmission hypothesis and including interference only from the TPs outside CoMP measurement set, (3) one fall-back CQI assuming SU transmission from only fall back serving TP and including interference from all other TPs, and (4) inter-point phase information for a coherent joint transmission. Note that non-coherent JT is a special case when 0-bit inter-point phase feedback is applied, which is helpful in reducing the signaling overhead. 
         [0038]    We propose and investigate different rules to determine per-TP PMI and phase for each CoMP UE to reach a complexity and performance tradeoff including, for example, (1) joint PMI and joint phase; (2) serving cell optimized PMI and joint PMI/phase among other intra-COMP TPs; and (3) independent PMI and joint phase. 
         [0039]    Joint PMI and Joint Phase 
         [0040]    In this rule, joint optimization of all PMIs and phases to maximize aggregate CQI. This is optimal with respect to aggregate CQI but not fallback single TP CQI. One apparent drawback of this method is its high complexity and suboptimality when fall-back single TP is eventually scheduled. 
         [0041]    Serving Cell Optimized PMI and Joint PMI/Phase Among Other Intra-COMP TPs 
         [0042]    A rule where fall back single TP CQI is optimized first and then remaining PMIs and phases are selected to maximize aggregate CQI. This is optimal with respect to fallback single TP CQI but not aggregate CQI. 
         [0043]    Independent PMI and Joint Phase 
         [0044]    In this rule, PMIs are independently selected assuming SU transmission from the respective TPs with muting of other intra-CoMP set TPs. The phases are then selected by maximizing the aggregate CQI using the selected PMIs. This rule has the lowest complexity. 
         [0045]    3.2 Pre-Scheduling CoMP UE Fallback 
         [0046]    UE is determined as a CoMP UE based on long term RSPR from the TPs the cluster. We propose a method called pre-scheduling CoMP UE fall-back (PSCUF) to reduce the feedback overhead without introducing system performance loss. Specifically, at the feedback stage, a CoMP UE can further determine or be indicated by the network whether it gives feedback as a CoMP UE or a non-CoMP UE based on a short-term SINR. 
         [0047]    A detailed procedure of PSCUF is described in the Further System Details section. 
         [0048]    4. Optimal Multi-Cell Scheduling for SU JT CoMP 
         [0049]    The original multi-cell scheduling problem is strongly NP (non-deterministic polynomial-time) hard, which includes the maximum weight independent set problem. We propose a scheduling procedure in which weighted sum rate has a guaranteed performance of the optimal solution. 
         [0050]    A detailed algorithm for the scheduling procedure is elaborated in the Further System Details section. 
         [0051]    The proposed solution can have, for example, some of the following features: 
         [0052]    (1) The proposed PSCUF scheme reduces the feedback overhead by CoMP UE fallback. 
         [0053]    (2) The proposed scheduling achieves a guaranteed performance as a ratio of that of an optimal solution. 
         [0054]    (3) The proposed CQI/PMI/RI computation scheme has low complexity. 
         [0055]    (4) The proposed scheme can be easily extended to the scenario that MU-MIMO. 
         [0056]    One or more of the following features and steps enable the efficiency of the proposed rate adaptation scheme: 
         [0057]    (1) The proposed PSCUF allows the UE to skip CoMP when UE detects that CoMP has no performance gain over single-cell transmission. 
         [0058]    (2) The proposed scheduling algorithm achieves a guaranteed performance of the original NP-hard scheduling problem. 
         [0059]    (3) The proposed CQI/PMI/RI computation achieves better performance. 
         [0060]    (4) The proposed CoMP transmission/reception achieves good performance at lower feedback overhead. 
         [0061]    The foregoing is to be understood as being in every respect illustrative and exemplary, but not restrictive, and the scope of the invention disclosed herein is not to be determined from the Detailed Description, but rather from the claims as interpreted according to the full breadth permitted by the patent laws. It is to be understood that the embodiments shown and described herein are only illustrative of the principles of the present invention and that those skilled in the art may implement various modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Those skilled in the art could implement various other feature combinations without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.