Abstract:
Disclosed is a system and method for monitoring wind turbines, generally comprising: measuring sound levels of a plurality of wind turbines; checking the sound levels of each of the plurality of wind turbines against sound levels of others of the plurality of wind turbines; detecting that one of the plurality of wind turbines is an anomalous wind turbine based upon the checking; and generating a corrective action alarm signal identifying the anomalous wind turbine based upon the detecting.

Description:
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to a system and method for monitoring wind turbines. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for detection of wind turbine degradation using acoustical monitoring. 
       BACKGROUND 
       [0002]    Recently, wind turbines have received increased attention as an environmentally safe and relatively inexpensive alternative energy source. With this growing interest, considerable efforts have been made to develop wind turbines that are reliable and efficient. 
         [0003]    Generally, a wind turbine includes a rotor having a rotatable hub assembly having multiple rotor blades. The rotor is mounted within a housing or nacelle, which is positioned on top of a truss or tubular tower. Utility grade wind turbines (i.e., wind turbines designed to provide electrical power to a utility grid) can have large rotors (e.g., 30 or more meters in diameter). Blades on these rotors transform wind energy into a rotational torque or force that drives one or more generators. The generators may be rotationally coupled to the rotor through a gearbox. The gearbox steps up the inherently low rotational speed of the turbine rotor for the generator to efficiently convert mechanical energy to electrical energy, which is fed into a utility grid. 
         [0004]    Gearless direct drive wind turbines also exist. The rotor, generator, gearbox and other components are typically mounted within a housing, or nacelle, that is positioned on top of a tower. 
         [0005]    Wind turbine components, such as bearings, gears, and/or rotor blades may become worn down or damaged over time. To detect such component damage, wind turbines often include a monitoring system that measures vibrations generated by the component during an operation of the wind turbine. Such monitoring systems may be complex and/or may require significant computational resources to extract component damage information from the measured vibrations. 
         [0006]    Operational detriments may eventually cause suboptimal performance, whether temporarily (e.g., rotor blade icing) or indefinitely (e.g., structural damage to a rotor blade). At least some known methods of monitoring wind turbines detect operational detriments indirectly by detecting anomalies or symptoms, such as decreased power output and/or inoperability, of a wind turbine. Moreover, because many potential causes exist for such anomalies or symptoms, determining the root cause of an anomaly or symptom requires manual inspection by a service technician, introducing undesirable delay and expense before the root cause can be addressed. In view of the disadvantages associated with the current solutions, there is a need in the art for improved methods and systems for monitoring wind turbines. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0007]      FIG. 1  illustrates a wind turbine having a tower base, middle section, and nacelle. 
           [0008]      FIG. 2  illustrates a detection unit used in accordance with one embodiment. 
           [0009]      FIG. 3  illustrates a display of sound or noise levels detected at different frequency bands as well as a single sound or noise threshold for all frequency bands of interest in accordance with one embodiment. 
           [0010]      FIG. 4  illustrates a system for acoustical monitoring of wind turbines in accordance with one embodiment. 
           [0011]      FIG. 5  illustrates a flowchart describing an initialization phase for a method for acoustical monitoring of wind turbines in accordance with one embodiment. 
           [0012]      FIG. 6  illustrates a flowchart describing an operational phase for a method for acoustical monitoring of wind turbines in accordance with one embodiment. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0013]    The following detailed description and the appended drawings describe and illustrate some embodiments of the invention for the purpose of enabling one of ordinary skill in the relevant art to make and use the invention. As such, the detailed description and illustration of these embodiments are purely illustrative in nature and are in no way intended to limit the scope of the invention, or its protection, in any manner. It should also be understood that the drawings are not to scale and in certain instances details have been omitted, which are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, such as details of fabrication and assembly. 
         [0014]    In accordance with one embodiment, a wind sound detection unit may include a microphone, a filter, a processor, and a communications module. Those elements may be integrated in a small enclosure. The detection unit may be mounted on different locations on the turbine which have access to a turbine communications network. In one embodiment, the wind sound detection unit may be placed on a lower section of a tower supporting the wind turbine if the turbine does not have network connectivity in the nacelle, for example. In one embodiment, the detection unit may be installed in the nacelle. 
         [0015]    Through use of the microphone, the detection unit may detect acoustic emissions generated by the turbine. The acoustic emissions are filtered and processed by a processor to generate sound level data. The sound level data may be communicated using a communications module over a turbine network to a software program on a SCADA server or a dedicated PLC. The wind sound analysis may be done either in the detection unit or in a program in the SCADA server or in a dedicated PLC. The term “monitoring device” is used herein to refer to the PLC, SCADA, or any other monitoring device that runs the monitoring software. 
         [0016]    A Modbus interface may also be used to configure the detection unit. Exemplary configuration parameters may include: 
         [0017]    Network address. 
         [0018]    Alarm levels of the frequency ranges, e.g., 20 frequency range alarm limits (the absolute minimum and maximum frequencies may be determined by the sensitivity of the selected microphone). 
         [0019]    Configuring the system so that the Modbus IP communications interface is polled periodically (e.g., every 10 seconds) during operation, with the polled data including maximum sound level for each of the frequency ranges. 
         [0020]    Resetting the maximum sound level to zero after each read or poll. 
         [0021]    Setting the length of sound capture files (e.g., in seconds). 
         [0022]    Calibration of the sound levels to compensate for variations in microphone sensitivity. 
         [0023]    The configuration parameter related to resetting of maximum sound or volume level to zero is further explained. In one embodiment, to detect a maximum volume within a polling period, each poll resets all the detected maximum sound levels to zero. 
         [0024]    In another embodiment, the length of sound capture files is configured. For example, the system may allow for real-time sound file creation by the detection unit. These captures will collect the microphone input to a WAV file for remote analysis. 
         [0025]    In one embodiment, the wind sound detection unit may include a single circuit board mounted in a small enclosure. The circuit board may have the microphone mounted on it or the microphone may be mounted externally to the detection unit. The circuit board may also include a processor, a filtering device (for example, a digital signal processor (“DSP”)), and the communications module (for example, an Ethernet connection interface). In one embodiment, by using the Modbus protocol as a communications standard, data collection and analysis may be implemented in a variety of ways. For example, sound analysis may be performed by software in the detection unit or a SCADA server or by a dedicated PLC connected to both the turbine network (for example, a LAN) and a control network (for example, a WAN). In another embodiment, sound analysis may be performed at the detection unit. 
         [0026]    As illustrated in  FIG. 1 , one embodiment of the monitoring system of the present invention includes a tower  101  for supporting the wind turbine  103  and three wind sound detection units installed on a plurality of testing points (for collecting the sound samples). As illustrated in  FIG. 1 , testing points may be located on the tower base  105 , a tower middle section  107 , and the nacelle  109 . 
         [0027]    As illustrated in  FIG. 2 , the wind sound detection unit may include a microphone  201 , a filtering device  203 , a processor  205 , and a communications module  207  such as an Ethernet connection interface. In one embodiment, the filtering device  203 , microprocessor  205 , communications module  207 , and/or the microphone  201  may be supplied with power and may exchange data through use of Power Over Ethernet (“POE”) technology  209 . In one embodiment, the filtering device  203  may be programmed to split the signal detected by the microphone  201  into a plurality of signals in accordance with different frequency bands, each of which will have a predetermined frequency range. 
         [0028]    As illustrated in  FIG. 3 , one embodiment also includes a display  301  of sound or noise levels detected at different frequency bands as well as a single sound or noise threshold for all frequency bands of interest. In the figure, noise or sound detected in one frequency band  303  exceeds the single sound threshold  305 , which in one embodiment results in the generation of an alarm signal. In other embodiments of the invention, each frequency band may have an associated threshold which may vary or may be set depending on the frequency band. 
         [0029]      FIG. 4  illustrates a high level description of a monitoring system in accordance with one embodiment. The figure illustrates two different wind turbines,  401  and  402 , in a wind farm, each turbine having two or more wind sound detection units. As illustrated, data may be exchanged between the detection units and a monitoring device  404  (for example, SCADA or PLC) over a turbine network  406  (for example, a LAN). As further depicted in  FIG. 4 , data is also exchanged between the monitoring device  404  and a central control facility  408  over a control network  410  (for example, a WAN). In one embodiment, the central control facility  408  sends commands to the monitoring device  404  to take corrective actions with respect to the operation of a wind turbine upon receipt of an alarm signal. 
         [0030]    In accordance with illustrative embodiments, the sound analysis may be performed by software in the detection unit or in the SCADA server or by a dedicated PLC in two phases: 1) an initialization phase where the software learns what the normal sound levels are, or where the normal sound levels are determined for each of the frequency ranges and the alarm levels are preloaded into the detection units; and 2) an operation phase, where the turbines are monitored for variances from that normal level. For example, as illustrated in  FIG. 5 , at the initialization stage the software program run by the monitoring device may implement the following tasks:
       Set the bandwidth for each of the frequency bands in the wind sound detection unit (step  501 ).   Obtain the turbine real time power output from the SCADA system (step  503 ).   Poll each turbine wind sound detection unit (step  505 ).   Create a database of maximum sound levels at each frequency range for each power output range, for example, at 50 kW resolution (step  507 ).       
 
         [0035]    The creation of a database of maximum sound levels at each frequency range for each power output range is further explained. The expected sound levels may change depending on the turbine output power. A turbine at full generation is expected to emit more noise than a turbine at low generation. Thus, the system of the present invention may read the maximum sound levels generated in ranges of power generation with a 50 kW resolution. For example the system may read a first maximum sound level at a range of 0-50 kW; a second maximum sound level at a range of 51-100 kW; and a third maximum sound level at a range of 101-150 kW, and so on. 
         [0036]    At the conclusion of the initialization phase, the measured sound levels of each of the turbines may be checked against the others (of the same type of turbine) to detect any anomalous turbines. As illustrated in  FIG. 6 , in one embodiment, after completion of the initialization phase the software may be set to an operational phase to perform the following tasks:
       Poll each turbine (e.g., all turbines in a wind farm or a subset thereof) wind sound detection unit every 10 seconds (step  601 ).   Obtain the turbine power output from the SCADA system (step  603 ).   Compare current noise levels against the noise or sound levels stored in a database by frequency and note any change from normal levels (step  605 ). This provides the ability to compare normal and abnormal readings for similar turbines across the fleet. The database may exist anywhere on the network, for example, at each turbine site or remotely.   Determine if noise level exceeded its normal sound levels for a defined period of time (step  607 ).   Generate alarms after a turbine has exceeded its normal sound levels for a defined period of time (step  609 ). For example, the alarm may go off if a single frequency band exceeds expected levels. A person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that some types of failures will occur in a specific frequency range.       
 
         [0042]    In one embodiment, the detection unit determines the frequency ranges associated with an alarm. Thus, instead of merely forwarding sound data to a PLC or SCADA, the detection units may perform the sound threshold comparisons. 
         [0043]    In another embodiment, a WAV file is captured directly by the detection unit so that sound files are created in the detection unit, as opposed to having the detection units forward sound samples to the SCADA or PLC. 
         [0044]    The present description of the invention makes reference to the use of SCADA systems and PLCs for monitoring and controlling the operation of wind turbines. In general, use of SCADA systems and PLCs to monitor wind turbines is known in the art. The present application incorporates by reference U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/979,752 entitled “REMOTE WIND TURBINE RESET SYSTEM AND METHOD.” That application, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses the use of programmable logic controllers (“PLCs”) and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (“SCADA”) systems to monitor and control wind turbines. 
         [0045]    The descriptions set forth above are meant to be illustrative and not limiting. Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the concepts described herein. 
         [0046]    The foregoing description of possible implementations consistent with the present invention does not represent a comprehensive list of all such implementations or all variations of the implementations described. The description of only some implementation should not be construed as an intent to exclude other implementations. For example, artisans will understand how to implement the invention in many other ways, using equivalents and alternatives that do not depart from the scope of the invention. Moreover, unless indicated to the contrary in the preceding description, none of the components described in the implementations are essential to the invention. 
         [0047]    The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects. Further, the limitations of the following claims are not written in means—plus-function format and are not intended to be interpreted based on 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless and until such claim limitations expressly use the phrase “means for” followed by a statement of function void of further structure. 
         [0048]    This written description uses examples to disclose the various embodiments of the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the various embodiments of the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods.