Abstract:
A system and method for managing a remote procedure call (RPC) system in a distributed system is disclosed. The distributed computing system is typically implemented as a client server model. A server implements several procedures and offers these procedures as services to clients in the distributed computing system. A server handles multiple RPC requests from multiple clients. A client sends an RPC request to a server; the server processes the requested procedure, and sends a reply back to the client.

Description:
BACKGROUND 
       [0001]    The present invention relates generally to remote procedure calls in a distributed computing system. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and a system for managing remote procedure calls in a distributed computing system, based on an event-driven mechanism. 
         [0002]    Computer applications include one or more program units, such as a function or a procedure, hereinafter referred to as procedures. Each procedure includes a block of programming codes that implement an operation or functionality on a set of values, hereinafter referred to as parameters. 
         [0003]    A procedure may be located on the same node as the application program. Alternatively, the procedure may be located on a remote node. A procedure-based model of application processing enables the execution of a computer application on disparate computational devices. The remote procedure call system, therefore, enables the application program being executed on one computer, hereinafter referred to as client-computational node, to execute a desired procedure located on a remote computational node, hereinafter referred to as server-computational node. 
         [0004]    In a distributed computing system, server-computational nodes publish a list of services they can offer to client-computational nodes. In a distributed computing system, multiple client interactions are active on a server-computational node. The server-computational nodes in the prior art implement the remote procedure call system by using a multi-threaded environment, spawning a separate thread of execution for each client request. 
         [0005]    In the remote procedure call systems known in the prior art, the multiple threads of execution share the processing time of the processor, based on an algorithm. However, as the number of threads being simultaneously processed on a server-computational node increases, thread swapping becomes inefficient. For example, a thread may be blocked, waiting for an action from a thread that is progressing very slowly due to a large number of threads being supported under time slicing. In addition to the above, each thread requires its own stack for processing, which increases memory overheads at the server-computational node. 
         [0006]    The two most important overheads associated with switching of thread are context switching and storage management. 
         [0007]    Context switching includes storing the present state of a running thread and retrieving the old state of a sleeping thread. The actual information stored and retrieved may include a range of chip registers including, for example, general registers, segment registers, and so forth. Therefore, context switching involves changing a large amount data, which makes it a very expensive operation in an operating system. 
         [0008]    Another challenge being faced by the programmers is to maintain the performance of massively threaded applications by reducing the storage management overhead. A stack is allocated for each thread. The specifics of stack management are implementation dependent. However, a stack size always has to be big enough to handle a wide range of potential calling patterns and therefore, it is always much larger than the actual data space required to store the data. 
         [0009]    In a multithreaded environment the discrete state of a process is indeterminable. Moreover, the value an entity shared across multiple threads cannot be precisely determined. Thus, the principle of multithreading is not only complex and hence error-prone, but also inefficient. Several reasons that make multithreading error prone include deadlocks, race conditions, failure of synchronization, and so on. 
         [0010]    Most importantly, in the case of processors that do not support hyper threading and similar techniques, multithreading is just an illusion of concurrency. The operating system provides the illusion of concurrency by rapidly switching between multiple threads of execution running on the server-computational node at a predefined interval of time, called a time slice. The length of the time slice for which a thread of execution is allowed to use the processor becomes an important parameter for a system designer. The time slice has to be small enough so that the end user actually gets the illusion of concurrency, and at the same time it has to be large enough for a program to complete a meaningful amount of work per time slice. Moreover, the switching of threads burdens the system with additional overheads and degrades the performance. 
         [0011]    In light of the above discussion, there is need to address the numerous problems related to a multithreaded remote procedure call system. 
       SUMMARY 
       [0012]    An object of the present invention is to manage a remote procedure call system in a distributed computing system. 
         [0013]    Another object of the invention is to implement a single thread of execution based event-driven remote procedure call system. 
         [0014]    Yet another object of the invention is to improve the efficiency of server side processing in remote procedure call systems. 
         [0015]    The present invention implements a remote procedure call system in which a server-computational node handles multiple client requests by using a single thread of execution. The server-computational node receives a client request by using a ticket. A ticket is an entity representing a logical event-driven activity. Each ticket performs a specified task for which it is created. At the completion of the specified task of the ticket, the ticket is deleted. The ticket also issues a new ticket that performs the next step in processing the remote procedure call request. This process is repeated till the time the server-computational node finally writes a remote procedure call reply to the remote procedure call request, and the connection between the client-computational node and the server-computational node is closed. 
         [0016]    Therefore, the present invention offers an efficient alternative from a multi-threaded approach to a single-threaded environment for implementing the remote procedure call system. All the system overheads and other problems associated with a multithreaded approach are thus overcome. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0017]    The preferred embodiments of the invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, provided to illustrate and not to limit the invention, wherein like designations denote like elements, and in which: 
           [0018]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating a distributed computing system in which the various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented; 
           [0019]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram illustrating a client-server model of the distributed computing system, in accordance with an embodiment the present invention; 
           [0020]      FIG. 3  is a functional block diagram illustrating a structure of a server runtime system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0021]      FIG. 4  is a functional block diagram illustrating a structure of a client runtime system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0022]      FIG. 5  is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a server-computational node, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0023]      FIG. 6  is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a ticket container system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0024]      FIG. 7  is a block diagram illustrating a state transition of a ticket, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0025]      FIG. 8  is a block diagram illustrating a structure of the ticket, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0026]      FIG. 9  is a flowchart illustrating a method for implementing an event-based remote procedure call system in a distributed computing system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and 
           [0027]      FIG. 10  is a flowchart illustrating a method for implementing the event-based remote procedure call system in a distributed computing system, in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the present invention. 
       
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
       [0028]    Various embodiments of the present invention provide method, system and computer program products for implementing an event-based remote procedure call system in a distributed computing system. 
         [0029]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating a distributed computing system  100  in which various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented. Distributed computing system  100  includes a plurality of computational nodes  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c ,  102   d , and  102   e . Distributed computing system  100  also includes a network  104 . 
         [0030]    Distributed computing system  100  enables processing of different parts of an application on a plurality of processors located on one or more computational nodes. Each of computational nodes  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c ,  102   d , and  102   e  (hereinafter referred to as computational nodes  102 ) is a general-purpose computational device. Examples of computational devices include mainframe computers, minicomputers, engineering workstations, desktop personal computers, laptops, and so forth. 
         [0031]    Computational nodes  102  are connected to network  104 . Examples of network  104  include a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), a wireless network, other Internet-enabled networks, and so forth. Computational nodes  102  are connected to network  104  with the help of connecting media. Examples of connecting media include a physical wire connection, wireless communication, and so forth. 
         [0032]    Distributed computing system  100  may be implemented in any of a variety of architectures, including, a 2-tier architecture (client-server architecture), a 3-tier architecture, an N-tier architecture, a peer-to-peer architecture, a tightly-coupled architecture, a service-oriented architecture, a mobile-code-based architecture, and a replicated-repository-based architecture. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention, as will be described below with reference to the 2-tier (client-server) architecture, can be implemented in any of the variety of architectures mentioned above. 
         [0033]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram illustrating the client-server architecture  200  of the distributed computing system  100 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0034]    Client-server architecture  200  includes a client-computational node  202 , a server-computational node  204 , a network  206 , and a name services system  208 . Client-computational node  202  includes a client application  210 , a client stub  212 , and a client runtime system  214 . Server-computational node  204  includes a server manager system  216 , a server stub  218 , and a server runtime system  220 . 
         [0035]    Server-computational node  204  exports information pertaining to procedures residing on server-computational node  204  to name services system  208 . Client-computational node  202  imports information relating to the procedures residing on server-computational node  204  from name services system  208 . 
         [0036]    Client-computational node  202  generates a remote procedure call request for a procedure residing on server-computational node  204 . Network  206  routes the remote procedure call request to server-computational node  204 . 
         [0037]    Client application  210  is an application program running on client-computational node  202 . Client application  210  generates a request for a procedure. In an embodiment of the present invention, the request generated is similar to a local procedure call. Client application  210  passes a set of parameters along with the request to client stub  212 . In an embodiment of the present invention, client application  210  also includes a unique identifier that uniquely identifies a procedure in a server manager system. Client stub  212  marshals the parameters and includes all such information as is necessary to execute the requested procedure. Client stub  212  thereafter passes the request to client runtime system  214 , which casts the request into a remote procedure call request and transfers the request to server runtime system  220  by using network  208 . 
         [0038]    Server runtime system  220  receives the remote procedure call request and passes the request to server stub  218 . Server stub  218  unmarshals the parameters in the remote procedure call request and passes the request to server manager system  216 . Server manager system  216  invokes the requested procedure associated with an appropriate manager (not shown in the figure). 
         [0039]    Server manager system  216  passes the result of processing the procedure as a reply to server stub  218 . Server stub  218  marshals the result and passes the reply to server runtime system  220 . Server runtime system  220  casts the reply into a remote procedure call reply and transfers the remote procedure call reply to client runtime system  214  by using network  206 . 
         [0040]    Client runtime system  214  receives the remote procedure call reply and passes the remote procedure call reply to client stub  212 . Client stub  212  unmarshals the result in the remote procedure call reply and passes the result to client application  210 . 
         [0041]    Server stub  218  and client stub  212  are codes generated by using an interface definition language (IDL) compiler. In an embodiment of the present invention, an application programmer generates an interface, using which a server procedure is invoked. The interface code is written by using an interface definition language (IDL). The interface code is thereafter compiled by using the IDL compiler. The IDL compiler generates two compiled codes in the form of client stub  212  and server stub  218 . Therefore, client stub  212  and server stub  218  are application specific codes. However, from an application programmer&#39;s point of view, they act as a separate transparent layer to implement the remote procedure call. 
         [0042]    Network  206  is a network of computational devices, as described in conjunction with  FIG. 1 . Name services system  208  stores the information pertaining to the procedures residing in a computational node such as server-computational node  204 . The computational node, such as server-computational node  204 , exports information relating to such procedures that the computational node offers to other computational nodes in distributed computer system  100 . Computational nodes such as client-computational node  202  import information of such procedures that the computational node requires for running an application, such as client application  210 , from name services system  208 . In an embodiment of the present invention, name services system  208  serves as a central repository for all such procedures that can be remotely invoked from a first computational node to a second computational node. In an embodiment of the present invention, distributed computing system  100  includes a plurality of name services systems. 
         [0043]    In an embodiment of the present invention, server-computational node  204  sends a remote procedure call request to a third computational node in the manner described above. Therefore, server-computational node  204  acts as a client-computational node, and the third server-computational node acts as a server-computational node. 
         [0044]    Therefore, with reference to an Open System Interconnection (OSI) model, client application  210  and server manager system  216  together, form the application layer. Client stub  212  and server stub  218  together, form the presentation layer. Client runtime system  214  and server runtime system  220  together, form the session layer. Network  206  and network interface component of client runtime system  214  (not shown in the figure) and network interface component of server runtime system  220  (not shown in the figure) together, form the transport layer. 
         [0045]      FIG. 3  is a functional block diagram illustrating a structure of a server runtime system  220 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0046]    Server runtime system  220  includes an RPC management core  302 , a binding module  304 , an endpoints system  306 , an endpoint mapper  308 , a name-services interface  310 , and a network interface  312 . Network interface  312  includes an error-handling module  316 , a security and authentication system  318 , and a remote communication module  320 . 
         [0047]    RPC management core  302  controls the configuration of the components of server runtime system  220 , including, for example, network interface  312 . RPC management core  302  provides an RPC application-programming interface (API) to a network administrator of distributed computing system  100 . 
         [0048]    Binding module  304  includes information pertaining to the binding-related state of server-computational node  204 . The binding-related state provides information that is necessary to invoke a desired procedure of a desired manager in server manager system  216 . The binding-related state includes information such as protocol sequence, protocol version, transfer syntax, server address, endpoint, and other implementation-dependent information. Binding module  304  further includes client-binding information identifying client-computational node  202  to server-computational node  204 . 
         [0049]    Endpoints system  306  includes a set of endpoints. An endpoint is an address of a specific server instance located on server-computational node  204  on which the specific server instance receives a remote procedure call request. In an embodiment of the present invention, the endpoints are well-known endpoints that are assigned to server instances located on server-computational node  204 . In another embodiment of the present invention, the endpoints also include dynamic endpoints, which are dynamically assigned at runtime. Endpoint mapper  308  is a service that maintains a record of dynamic endpoints. Binding module  304  registers information related to interfaces, interface versions, and other such information that is necessary to invoke a desired procedure on the server-computational node with endpoint mapper  308 . In an embodiment of the present invention, endpoint mapper  308  has a well-defined endpoint. 
         [0050]    Name services interface  310  provides an interface to name services system  208 . Name services interface  310  is used to export information related to such procedures that server-computational node  204  provides to other computational nodes located in distributed computing system  100 . 
         [0051]    Network interface  312  provides an interface for all communication between server-computational node  204  and a remote computational node, including, for example, client-computational node  202 . Remote communication module  320  implements a protocol tower for protocols used for different layers of communication between server-computational node  204  and client-computational node  202 . The transport protocols used include Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), Universal Datagram Protocol/Internet Protocol (UDP/IP), Internet Packet Exchange/Sequenced Packet Exchange (IPX/SPX), Network Basic Input/Output System (NetBIOS), NetBIOS Extended User Interface (NETBEUI), Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), DCEnet3.0, Server Message Block (SMB) and so forth. 
         [0052]    Error-handling module  316  implements error handling in network communication. Errors that occur in the remote procedure call system include, for example, time-outs, lost connection, and so forth. Security and authentication module  318  is used to implement authentication and authorization services. Server and authentication module  318  is also used to establish authorization levels for remote procedure calls. 
         [0053]    Internal service routines  314  include procedures that may be used frequently. Therefore, to improve the performance of server-computational node  204 , these procedures are included in server runtime system  220 . The procedures include program and storage management services, time-of-day services, and similar system services. These procedures also include initialization and control routines used by RPC management core  302 . 
         [0054]      FIG. 4  is a functional block diagram illustrating a structure of a client runtime system  214 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0055]    Client runtime system  214  includes an RPC management core  402 , a name services interface  404 , a binding module  406 , a network interface  408 , and a local procedure call system  410 . Network interface  408  includes an error-handling module  412 , a security and authentication module  414 , and a remote communication module  416 . 
         [0056]    RPC management core  402  controls the configuration of the components of client runtime system  214 , including, for example, network interface  408 . RPC management core  402  provides an RPC application-programming interface (API) to a network administrator of distributed computing system  100 . 
         [0057]    Name-services interface  404  provides an interface to name services system  208 . Name-services interface  404  is used to import binding information related to such procedures that server-computational node  204  offers to other computational nodes located in distributed computing system  100 . 
         [0058]    Binding module  406  contains information pertaining to the binding-related state of client-computational node  202 . The binding-related state provides information that is necessary to invoke a desired procedure of a desired manager in server manager system  216 . The binding-related state includes such information as protocol sequence, protocol version, transfer syntax, server address, endpoint, and other implementation-dependent information. Binding module  304  also includes server-binding information identifying server-computational node  204  to client-computational node  202 . 
         [0059]    Network interface  408  provides an interface for all communication between client-computational node  202  and server-computational node  204 . Remote communication module  416  implements the protocol tower for protocols used for different layers of communication between server-computational node  204  and client-computational node  202 . The transport protocols used include TCP/IP, UDP/IP, IPX/SPX, NetBIOS, NETBEUI, HTTP, DCEnet3.0, SMB, and so forth. 
         [0060]    Error-handling module  412  implements error-handling in network communication. Errors that occur in the remote procedure call system include, for example, time-outs, lost connection, and so forth. Security and authentication module  414  implements authentication and authorization services. Further, server and authentication module  414  also establishes authorization levels for remote procedure calls. 
         [0061]    Local procedure call system  410  invokes a procedure on client-computational node  202 . When client application  210  makes a request for a procedure that resides locally on client-computational node  202 , RPC management core  402  invokes local procedure call system  410 . Therefore, client runtime system  214  provides complete transparency to client application  210  with respect to a procedure call. If the procedure is located on a remote computational node, the request is routed to an appropriate computational node registered with the name services system for providing the service. However, if the procedure is located on the same node from where the request originates, it is invoked locally without invoking a remote procedure call. 
         [0062]      FIG. 5  is a functional block diagram illustrating a structure of a server-computational node  500 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0063]    Server-computational node  500  includes a server manager system  502 , a server stub  504 , a server runtime system  506 , a ticket container system  508 , and an event monitor  510 . 
         [0064]    Server manager system  502 , server stub  504 , and server runtime system  506  submit tickets in ticket container system  508 . Event monitor  510  keeps track of all events occurring in the system, and changes the status of tickets residing in ticket container system  508 , based on the events. 
         [0065]    In an embodiment of the present invention, the server-computational node  500  has a single thread of execution to implement the RPC system at the server-computational node. The activities performed by the components of server-computational node  500 , as described herein, are performed by using the single thread of execution. 
         [0066]    Server manager system  502 , server stub  504 , and server runtime system  506  share the single thread of execution. Therefore, to process a request in such a single threaded environment, tickets are used. A ticket is an entity that includes the contextual information related to a request and other such information, as may be necessary for processing a request. The ticket also includes information relating to functions, which operate on data contained in the ticket. Therefore, the ticket is an entity that helps the remote procedure call components constituting the server-computational node to process a remote procedure call request by using the single thread of execution. 
         [0067]    During the course of processing a request, when server manager system  502 , server stub  504 , and server runtime system  506  come to a point where it is necessary to wait for some activity to be completed, a ticket ‘t’ is submitted to ticket container system  508 . The ticket ‘t’ thus generated waits for the activity to complete. At this point in time, the ticket ‘t’ is ineligible for being processed and it is in ‘inactive and ineligible’ state. The single thread of execution invokes ticket container system  508  to identify tickets, which are eligible for processing at that point in time. The single thread of execution invokes one of the tickets that are eligible for processing, based on a predefined criterion. 
         [0068]    An event is generated at the instant the activity for which ticket ‘t’ is waiting is completed. Subsequently, event monitor  510  marks the ticket ‘t’ as eligible. At a later point of time, the single thread of execution invokes ticket ‘t’, and therefore, processing for the request continues asynchronously, based on an event-driven mechanism. 
         [0069]    In an embodiment of the present invention, the system is implemented by using two threads, which share processor time, based on a predefined criterion. In an another embodiment of the present invention, one of the two threads is a low-priority thread and the other is a high-priority thread. The two threads share the processor time, based on the relative priority of the two threads. In another embodiment of the present invention, a plurality of threads is used, sharing the processor time, in accordance with a predefined criterion. 
         [0070]    In another embodiment of the present invention, server-computational node  500  is implemented by using multiple processors. Each of the processors has a single thread of execution running on it. In yet another embodiment, one or more of the processors have a plurality of threads of execution, sharing the processor time according to a predefined criterion. 
         [0071]    Procedures included in internal service routines  314 , described in conjunction with  FIG. 3 , as well as procedures implemented in managers of service manger system  502 , are logically broken down into a plurality of parts, based on two criteria. The first is as follows: Whenever a procedure makes an I/O system call for which the procedure has to wait for further processing till the call returns, it stops executing and issues a new ticket in which it passes the context of the processing being performed. The new ticket thus issued becomes eligible for processing when the call returns; event monitor  510  captures the return of the call, and processing of the new ticket is started at a later point of time when the single thread of execution decides to invoke the ticket, based on a predefined criterion. 
         [0072]    The second is as follows: When a procedure exceeds a predefined amount of time of execution, the execution of the procedure is stopped and a new ticket is generated in which the contextual information of the processing performed till that point in time is saved. 
         [0073]    In another embodiment of the present invention, in addition to the single thread of execution as described above, the server-computational node spawns one or more auxiliary threads. The one or more auxiliary threads are assigned to perform auxiliary services as desired. 
         [0074]      FIG. 6  is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a ticket container system  508 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0075]    Ticket container system  508  includes an ineligible ticket container  602 , an internal ticket container  604 , and an external ticket container  606 . Ineligible ticket container  602  includes a plurality of tickets  608   a ,  608   b ,  608   c ,  608   d , and  608   e . Similarly, internal ticket container  604  includes a plurality of tickets  610   a ,  610   b ,  610   c ,  610   d ,  610   e , and  610   f . Similarly, external ticket container  606  includes a plurality of tickets  612   a ,  612   b ,  612   c ,  612   d ,  612   e  and  612   f.    
         [0076]    In an embodiment of the present invention, each ticket has a ticket identity provided by a number, for example, ticket  608   a  has an identity  5476 , and so on. 
         [0077]    A ticket, which is waiting for an event in the system to occur, such as the return of a system call, is ineligible and resides in ineligible ticket container  602 . At the instant that the event occurs, event monitor  510  captures the event, and thereafter, if the ticket is related to processing on the local node the ticket is transferred from ineligible ticket container  602  to internal ticket container  604 ,. If the ticket is related to processing on a remote node, it is transferred to external ticket container  606 . 
         [0078]    In an embodiment of the present invention, internal ticket container  604  and external ticket container  606  are implemented as data queues. Therefore, the tickets that are eligible for processing are processed on a first-in first-out basis. 
         [0079]    In another embodiment of the present invention, the single thread of execution for processing of the remote procedure call request running on server-computational node  204  invokes a ticket, based on a value of λ wherein λ is defined by the following mathematical function: 
         [0000]      λ= f ( t ,τ)
 
         [0080]    where t is the time elapsed since the ticket became eligible for processing and τ is the approximate time required to process the ticket. 
         [0081]    In an embodiment of the present invention, λ varies directly with value of t. Further λ varies inversely with value of τ. 
         [0082]    In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the single thread of execution schedules the eligible tickets in accordance with a suitable algorithm based on specific usage patterns. 
         [0083]      FIG. 7  is a block diagram illustrating a state transition of a ticket, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.  FIG. 7  shows state  702 , state  704 , and state  706  of the ticket. 
         [0084]    State  702  shows a ticket  001  that waits for an event A to occur. Ticket  001  is instantiated and waits for event A to occur. Therefore, ticket  001  is ineligible for processing, since event A has not occurred. Ticket  001  is then in an ‘inactive and ineligible’ state. When event A occurs, ticket  001  transitions from state  702  to state  704 . Ticket  001  is eligible for processing, and waits for an invocation from the single thread of execution running on server-computational node  204 . Ticket  001  is in then in an ‘inactive and eligible’ state. When the thread of execution starts processing ticket  001 , ticket  001  transitions from state  704  to state  706 . Ticket  001  is in then in an ‘active’ state. 
         [0085]    In an embodiment of the present invention, a ticket passes through one or more states, as described in  FIG. 7 . 
         [0086]      FIG. 8  is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a ticket  800 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0087]    Ticket  800  includes an event-type data slot  802 , a data slot  804 , a series of data slots  806 , a data slot  808 , a contextual-information data slot  810 , a status-information data slot  812 , a submit-function data slot  814 , and a completion-function data slot  816 . 
         [0088]    In an embodiment of the present invention, ticket  800  is implemented as a data structure. Event-type data slot  802  stores information of an event for which ticket  800  is waiting. Data slot  804 , data slot  808 , and a series of data slots  806  represent data slots used to store such information as is necessary to process ticket  800  and other relevant information. 
         [0089]    Contextual information data slot  810  saves contextual information of a remote procedure call request. When ticket  800  generates a new ticket, it passes the contextual information included in it to the new ticket. The new ticket saves the contextual information in the contextual-information data slot. The new ticket also keeps on updating the contextual information during the course of processing. 
         [0090]    Status information data slot  812  stores information related to status of ticket  800 . In an embodiment of the present invention, the status of ticket  800  is ineligible, eligible, fault, and cancelled. 
         [0091]    Submit function data slot  814  stores information that associates a submit function with ticket  800 . In an embodiment of the present invention, submit function data slot  814  stores a pointer that points to a submit function stored in a memory block. In an embodiment of the present invention, the single thread of execution running on server-computational node  204  invokes ticket  800  by calling the submit function. The submit function, therefore, starts the processing of ticket  800 . 
         [0092]    Completion function data slot  816  stores information that associates a completion function with ticket  800 . In an embodiment of the present invention, completion function data slot  816  stores a pointer that points to a completion function stored in a memory block. In an embodiment of the present invention, the completion function receives the result of the processing of ticket  800 . The completion function further invokes a new ticket if the processing of the remote procedure call request is not complete. The completion function passes the contextual information stored in contextual information data slot  810  to the new ticket. In an embodiment of the present invention, the completion function finally deletes ticket  800 . 
         [0093]      FIG. 9  is a flowchart illustrating a method for implementing an event-based remote procedure call system in a distributed computing system  100 , in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0094]    At  902 , a remote procedure call (RPC) request is received by using a ticket. In an embodiment of the present invention, a connect ticket is instantiated for an endpoint and submitted to ticket container  508 . The connect ticket waits for client computational node  202  to send an RPC request. 
         [0095]    At  904 , the ticket is processed based on an asynchronous event-driven mechanism by using a single thread of execution. When the RPC request arrives, the connect ticket becomes eligible to be processed. The single thread of execution running at server-computational node  204  invokes the connect ticket and starts processing. The processing of the connect ticket establishes a connection between client-computational node  202  and server-computational node  204 . Once the connection is established, the task of the connect ticket is complete, and a completion function of the ticket is called. The completion function of the connect ticket submits a new ticket and deletes the connect ticket. The new ticket is processed in a similar manner. This process of a ticket submitting a new ticket and subsequent processing of the new ticket continues till the request is processed. Thereafter, a write ticket is submitted. The write ticket, when processed, writes the result of the processing of the RPC request on the connection established between the client-computational node  202  and server-computational node  204 . Finally, a close connection ticket is submitted. The close connection ticket, when processed, closes the connection established between the client-computational node  202  and server-computational node  204 . 
         [0096]      FIG. 10  is a flowchart illustrating a method for implementing an event-based remote procedure call system in a distributed computing system  100 , in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0097]    At  1002 , a thread of the execution starts running, the server runtime system is initialized, and defaults are set. Further, a connect ticket is instantiated to receive an RPC request. At  1004 , an RPC request is received, using the connect ticket by invoking the submit function associated with the connect ticket. At  1006 , processing of the connect ticket is performed by the thread of execution. At  1008 , the result of the processing is returned to a completion function associated with the connect ticket. 
         [0098]    At  1010 , the completion function submits a new ticket, which embodies a logical next step in the processing of the RPC request, the new ticket obtaining contextual information pertaining to the RPC request from the connect ticket. 
         [0099]    At  1012 , the new ticket submitted at  1010  is analyzed. If the new ticket is not a close-connection ticket, it is processed in a similar manner as the method by which the connect ticket is processed. If the new ticket is a close-connection ticket, the close-connection ticket is processed and the connection is closed at  1014 . 
         [0100]    In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the connect ticket also instantiates a new connect ticket along with the new ticket at  1010 . The new connect ticket waits for a new RPC request. 
         [0101]    The event-based remote procedure call system, described here, thus offers an advantage of being a single-threaded implementation of remote procedure call system. This shift from a multithreaded to a single-threaded environment for implementing the remote procedure call system reduces the complexities associated with a multithreaded system. The implementation of remote procedure call system becomes simpler and various errors associated with a multithreaded environment are reduced. The server-computational node becomes more efficient in processing remote procedure calls requests. System overheads such as separate stacks associated with individual threads and switching contexts for multiple threads are eliminated. 
         [0102]    In addition to above, the present invention, facilitates the selection of an optimum scheduling algorithm based on application specific usage patterns on the server-computational node. 
         [0103]    The present invention, thus offers a simpler and more efficient remote procedure call system that is easier to program, implement, and maintain. 
         [0104]    While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be clear that it is not limited only to these embodiments. Numerous modifications, changes, variations, substitutions and equivalents will be apparent to those skilled in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as described in the claims.