Abstract:
A process for the hydrogenation of undissolved coal and subsequent liquefaction of the hydrogenated coal particles to provide useful hydrocarbon liquid products including naphtha, gasoline and diesel fuel. These low boiling hydrocarbon liquids are produced by the process comprising: (a) mixing solid coal particles with a coal derived solvent in a solvent/coal ratio ranging from about 8/1 to about 1.5/1 to provide a flowable coal/oil slurry of solid coal particles; (b) passing the coal/oil slurry and hydrogen upwardly through a first reaction zone containing a coal-derived liquid and bed of particulate catalyst maintained at a temperature ranging from about 400° to about 700° F. and a hydrogen partial pressure of 100 to 2000 psig for a time sufficient to hydrogenate the solid coal particles; and (c) withdrawing the coal/oil slurry having the hydrogenated coal particles from the first reaction zone and passing the coal/oil slurry to a second reaction zone containing a catalytic bed which is maintained at a temperature of between about 700° and about 850° F. and a hydrogen partial pressure of 9 to 2000 psig to liquefy and convert the coal to useful hydrocarbon liquid fuel products. The first and second reaction zones may include the same or different catalysts such as Co/Mo on a porous substrate, or the second reaction zone can include a noble metal such as platinum on a porous substrate such as alumina or silica.

Description:
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 033,856; filed Apr. 6, 1987, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 874,886 filed June 16, 1986, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 472,915 filed Mar. 7, 1983 all now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF INVENTION 
     This invention relates to a coal liquefaction process, and more particularly, it relates to the hydrogenation of undissolved coal hydrogenation and and subsequent liquefaction thereof to provide useful hydrocarbon liquid and gas fuel products wherein solid coal particulates are hydrogenated in a coal/oil slurry of a hydrocarbon liquid solvent in the presence of a particles hydrogenation catalyst. 
     Conventional processes for coal liquefaction and hydrogenation include a preheating or thermal dissolution step for the coal-oil slurry feed prior to the catalyst reaction step, as generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,519,555; 3,700,584; 3,791,957 and 4,111,788. Other coal hydrogenation processes use fine recycled catalysts at plug flow conditions and low solvent/coal ratios such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,090,943 and 4,102,775. In these processes, the coal-oil slurry is preheated to near the reactant temperature before feeding it into the catalytic reaction zone. 
     In these conventional coal hydrogenation processes which utilize the coal-slurry preheating step, the hydrogen donor potential or hydrogen concentration of the coal-derived slurrying oil therein is limited by its mobility and the hydrogen is usually consumed during the coal preheating and dissolution steps. These processes are also lacking in that the coal is not sufficiently hydrogenated to fully liquefy or convert coal to useful hydrocarbon liquids and gas fuel products as provided herein. 
     The conventional methods of coal liquefaction attempt to liquefy coal while having donatable hydrogen available in the solvent liquid to &#34;seal off&#34; free radicals which crack from the coal. Catalytic processes provide a greater quantity of hydrogen for this purpose by hydrogenating the solvent. In significant contrasts, the process of the present invention relies on substantial hydrogenation of the particulate coal in the first stage, particle but the predominant transfer of the donatable hydrogen to the coal particle takes place before the liquefaction thereof. Once the coal liquefies, the excess hydrogen in the products induces almost immediate reformation reactions which in turn result in stable, light compounds. In hydrocarbon the conventional liquefaction processes, more heavy residual products are made since the polymerization reactions, i.e., condensation, are competitive with the hydrogen transfer from solvent reformation reactions which occur much slower. 
     In a process developed by Qader and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,530, a process for the hydrogenation of coal and subsequent treatment of hydrogenated coal to produce fuels and chemicals is provided. In this process, there is not any solvent used and the hydrogen provided in the process involves the hydrogen transfer from the gas phase to solid phase. In an attempt to hydrogenate the coal, the coal has been pulverized into very fine particles. This procedure of hydrogenating a dry coal, provides great difficulty in the hydrogenation thereof in order to liquefy or convert such coal to useful fuel products. Thus; the present coal hydrogenation and liquefaction process is needed in order to fully and more completely convert the hydrogenated coal of various types to useful low boiling hydrocarbons liquids and fuel products such as gasoline, diesel fuel oil, and naphtha. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     The present invention provides a process for the two stage hydrogenation of particulate coal and the subsequent liquefaction thereof to provide useful hydrocarbon liquid and fuel products. The process comprises: 
     (a) mixing solid coal particles with a hydrocarbon liquid solvent in a solvent/coal weight ratio at least sufficient to provide a flowable coal/oil slurry of the solid coal particles; 
     (b) passing the coal/oil slurry and hydrogen upwardly through a first reaction zone containing a hydrocarbon liquid in a catalytic bed of particulate hydrogenation catalyst maintained at a temperature ranging from about 400° to about 700° F. and a hydrogen partial pressure of 100 to 2000 psig for a period of time sufficient to substantially hydrogenate the solid coal particles and liquid solvent in the coal/oil slurry; 
     (c) withdrawing the coal/oil slurry having the hydrogenated coal particles from the first reaction zone and passing the coal/oil slurry to a second reaction zone containing a catalytic bed of particulate hydrogenation catalyst which is maintained at a higher temperature between about 700° and about 850° F., and a hydrogen partial pressure of 0 to 2000 psig to convert the hydrogenated coal particles to gas and liquid fractions; 
     (d) passing the liquid fractions from the second reaction zone to a gas liquid, solid separation zone from which a liquid stream containing a reduced solids concentration is recycled to provide a hydrogenated coal-derived solvent liquid for the coal/oil slurry; and 
     (e) recovering from the separation zone hydrocarbon liquid distillate and gaseous hydrocarbon products. 
     In the process, the nominal residence time of the materials in the first reaction zone ranges from about 5 to about 90 minutes and the residence time in the second reaction zone ranges from about 1 to about 90 minutes. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     This invention can best be understood by reference to the FIG. 1 drawing which is a schematic diagram of the present continuous two stage process of the hydrogenation/liquefaction of coal, wherein the hydrogenation reactor, liquefaction/conversion reactor, separation-purification systems and recycle conduits are shown. 
     FIG. 2 is a chart showing a comparison of yield distributions of solubles for the process of the present invention. 
     FIG. 3 is a graph showing the effect of hydrogen pressure on percent coal conversion. 
     FIGS. 4 and 5 are charts showing the comparative conversion results for the present conversion process compared to other processes for bituminous and low rank coals. 
     FIG. 6 is a chart showing comparative performance of the present process compared to other known processes for subbituminous coal mixed with heavy petroleum resid solvent. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION 
     The present process of hydrogenating coal particles and subsequently liquefying such hydrogenated particles to provide useful products involves the operation of two close-coupled catalytic bed reactors, i.e., first and second reaction zones. In the first reaction zone, the conditions are designed to promote the hydrogenation of the coal particles and to effect most of the heteroatom removal to by-products such as hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and water. In the second reaction zone, the conditions are maintained sufficient for the conversion/liquefaction of the hydrogenated coal to hydrocarbon convert it readily to liquid products while removing still more of the heteroatoms, e.g., hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and water. 
     According to the present invention, coal is hydrogenated prior to liquefaction in a system capable of providing usable hydrogen to sites within the solid coal matrix directly and also through the hydrogenated solvent oil. The process according to the present invention involves a well mixed catalytic first stage reaction zone in which a slurry of coal and hydrocarbon solvent is present with any suitable hydrogenation catalyst under increased temperature and hydrogen pressure. A suitable catalyst would be a cobalt/molybdenum catalyst on a substrate of alumina. According to the present invention, there is no limitation as to the hydrogenation catalyst used in the process. That is, any catalyst may be used providing it will promote the hydrogenation of solid coal particles. Also, the catalysts would be heterogenous and can be supported on any porous substrate, e.g., alumina or silica or mixtures thereof. The catalysts used in the beds of the first and second reaction zones may be a particulate catalyst having a substrate containing an active metal or metal compound selected from the group consisting of: Co/Mo; Ni/Mo; LiW or Sn promoted Co/Mo; NiS; CoS; MoS; FeS; FeS 2  ; LiH; and MgH 2 . Also, the catalyst used in the first and second reaction zones may be a noble metal such as platinum. More specifically, the catalyst may be a substrate material containing an active metal or metal compound selected from the group consisting of: metals of Group VIII of the Periodic Table, and their salts; tin; zinc; copper; chromium; and antimony. The catalyst may be the same in both the first and second reaction zones but this is not necessarily the preferred mode of operation. 
     The coal that is fed into this process and catalytically hydrogenated before it is liquefied may be any bituminous coal, such as Illinois No. 6 or Kentucky No. 11, or a subbituminous coal such as Wyodak. The feed material may also be lignite, or peat. In each case, the type of coal or coal/oil feedstock used will dictate the conditions required in the first and second reaction zones. 
     In the process, hydrogen is provided initially to the catalytic reaction to start up the process but during the course of the continuous two stage operation, hydrogen is recovered from the process and recycled to be fed into the first reaction zone to hydrogenate the feedstock, i.e., coal particles and hydrocarbon slurrying oil. During the process, a sufficient amount of hydrogen is provided in order to fully hydrogenate the coal feed so that it may be liquefied or converted easily at the higher temperature within the second reaction zone. Under normal conditions, the amount of hydrogen consumed or utilized in the first reaction zone, based on the weight of dry coal fed therein is between about 2.0 and about 4.0 W %. This amount of hydrogen may vary as based on the type of coal feed that is utilized in the present process. 
     The coal-derived solvent used to make up the coal/oil slurry may be any suitable coal-derived hydrocarbon liquid material wherein a substantial portion thereof has a normal boiling point ranging from about 400° F. to about 1100° F. Of this coal-derived liquid material i.e., solvent, at least about 50% has a normal boiling point above about 975° F. 
     According to the present invention, it has been found that a suitable hydrocarbon liquid solvent utilized in the coal/oil slurry may be selected from the group consisting of petroleum-derived residual oil, shale oil, tar sands, bitumen and an oil derived from coal other than that processed within the present process. The solvent oil is catalytically hydrogenated internally in the first reaction zone and migrates into the pore structure of the solid coal particles. Where the solvent gives up hydrogen to the coal particle matrix. The hydrogenated solvent molecules do this repeatedly until an equilibrium hydrogen content is achieved in the coal particles and coal/oil slurry. 
     In the first reaction zone, the coal is fed with hydrogen and through the first reaction zone into the catalytic bed, where the catalytic bed is maintained at a temperature ranging from about 400° to about 700° F. and a hydrogen partial pressure of 100 to 2000 psig with the total pressure being between about 100 and 4000 psig, and preferably ranging between about 1000 and about 3000 psig. The residence time of the materials in the first reaction zone ranges from about 5 to about 90 minutes, which is sufficient to hydrogenate the solid coal particles and the hydrocarbon solvent liquid in the coal/oil slurry. 
     After the coal solid particles have been hydrogenated in the first reaction zone, the coal/oil slurry is introduced into the second reaction zone where liquefaction of the coal occurs at higher temperature. The conditions in the second reaction zone are near to but less severe than the conditions for the conventional liquefaction of coal. Since the coal structures are weakened by the hydrogenation of the matrix, less thermal energy will be required to liquefy the coal in the second reaction zone since an excess of hydrogen exists in the solid phase of the coal; as well, a lower hydrogen partial pressure will still provide sufficient gas phase hydrogen to terminate free radicals of liquefaction products. The end result is to produce lighter or lower boiling hydrocarbon liquid products (i.e., distillate oil and naphtha) with less severe reaction conditions being required relative to the conventional coal liquefaction process. The temperature of the second reaction zone ranges from about 700° to about 850° F. and the hydrogen partial pressure ranges from about 0 to about 2000 psig with the total pressure being between about 500 and about 4000 psig and preferably ranging between about 1500 and about 2500 psig. The residence time of the materials in second reaction zone ranges from about 1 to about 90 minutes. 
     Although the second reaction zone is preferably a catalytic reaction zone, it may instead be a non-catalytic back mixed thermal reaction zone. 
     The coal particles fed to the present process have a particle size ranging from about 20 mesh to about 400 mesh (U.S. Sieve Series), and preferably from about 70 mesh to about 100 mesh (U.S. Sieve Series). 
     The products of the two stage hydrogenation and conversion process generally are distillate liquid hydrocarbon products such as naphtha, gasoline and diesel fuel and insoluble materials and ash are removed from the process. 
     According to the present invention, the product yields as provided by the prehydrogenation of the coal before it is liquefied results in the advantages of: 
     (a) the need for less severe conditions in the conversion/liquefaction reaction zones; and 
     (b) an increase in the yield or production of the products, i.e., hydrocarbon liquid distillate and products. 
     According to the present invention and as indicated and discussed below in the Examples, by use of the present invention, an increase in product yields will average from between at least about 5 and about 24% over that resulting from a conventional coal liquefaction process or single stage catalytic hydrogenation process. The yields from the present process of hydrocarbon liquid material such as cyclohexane solubles ranges from about 60 to about 90 W% of the coal feed. 
     DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     Referring to the FIG. 1 drawing, a continuous two-stage coal liquefaction process is schematically shown. As shown, a coal feed or feedstock is provided at 10. The coal being, e.g., an Illinois No. 6 coal or other bituminous coal, is ground to a particle size of about 70 mesh (U.S. Sieve Series) and smaller and dried to remove surface moisture and passed to a slurry mix tank 12. Here the particulate coal is blended with a process derived oil or an oil derived from coal in other than the process herein. The process derived oil or solvent is blended in at weight ratio of solvent to coal which is at least sufficient to provide a pumpable slurry mixture, and usually has a weight ratio range of solvent to coal ranging from about 8/1 to about 1.5/1. 
     The coal/oil slurry, i.e., blend from slurry mixing tank 12, is pressurized by pump 14, heated in feed preheater 26 and pumped through conduit 15 to blend along with make-up hydrogen through conduit 17 directly to an ebullated bed reactor 20 containing hydrogenated coal-derived liquid, the hydrogen and a bed 22 of particulate hydrogenation catalyst. The coal/oil slurry is passed with hydrogen through flow distributor grid plate 21 and upwardly through the catalyst ebullated bed 22 at sufficient velocity to expand the bed. The catalyst 22, which suitably may comprise particles such as 0.030-0.130 inch diameter extrudates of nickel/molybdate or cobalt/molybdate on alumina or a similar support material, is expanded by at least about 20% and not over about 100% of its settled height by the upflowing fluids, and is kept in constant random motion during reaction by the upward velocity of the coal/oil slurry and hydrogen gas. 
     The coal/oil slurry is passed upwardly through reactor 20 and in contact with the catalyst at average nominal residence times ranging from about 5.0 to about 90 minutes, and preferably from about 10 to about 30 minutes. The reaction conditions maintained within the first reaction zone 20 are a temperature of 400° to 700°; preferably 550° to about 650° F., and a 100-2000 psig hydrogen partial pressure, or a total pressure of between about 100 and 4000 psig, preferably ranging from about 1000 to about 3000 psig. The reactor liquid is recycled through a downcomer conduit 24 and recycle pump 25 and then passed upwardly through the distributor plate 21 to maintain sufficient upward liquid velocity to expand the catalyst bed and maintain the catalyst at random motion in the liquid to assure intimate contact with complete reactions to substantially hydrogenate the coal particles both directly and through the hydrocarbon solvent liquid therein. 
     From the first stage reactor 20 effluent stream 29 containing, the hydrogenated coal particles in the coal/oil slurry is passed into the bottom of the second stage reactor 30. The hydrogenated coal is then passed through a flow distributor and catalyst support grid plate 31 into an ebullated bed 32 of catalyst, in much the same way as the material flows through first stage reactor 20. The hydrogenated coal/oil slurry is passed upwardly through the reactor 30 in contact with the catalyst at nominal average residence times of about 1.0 to about 90 minutes, and preferably from about 10 to about 30 minutes. The reaction conditions maintained in the second stage reactor 30 are a higher temperature ranging from about 700° to about 850° F., preferably about 800° to about 825° F., and a 0-2000 psig hydrogen partial pressure, or a total pressure of between about 500 and about 4000 psig, preferably ranging from about 1500 to about 2500 psig. The reactor liquid in the second reactor 30 is recycled through downcomer conduit 34 and recycle pump 35 to heat exchanger 36 for heating and controlling the temperature of the reaction liquid of the second reactor 30 within a relatively narrow range. The reactor liquid is then passed upwardly through distributor plate 31 to maintain sufficient mixing and upward liquid velocity to expand the catalyst abullated bed and maintain the catalyst in random motion in the liquid to assure intimate contact and complete reactions therein. 
     From the second reactor 30 effluent stream 39 containing, the reaction liquid, i.e., liquefied coal and gaseous materials, is usually cooled and passed to hot separator 40. The resulting vapors are passed through conduit 41 and may be processed in a first separation-purification system 60 as desired to obtain recovered low purity hydrogen, which is recycled through conduit 16 to preheater 18 and then into the bottom of reactor 20. Other light gases such as hydrogen sulfide, NH 3 , and CO x  are emitted from purification system 60 through conduit 51; and product gases, i.e., low boiling, light hydrocarbon gases are emitted from system 60 through conduit 52. 
     From the bottom of the hot phase separator 40, a coal-derived slurry liquid is withdrawn through conduit 42. The slurry liquids in conduits 42 are processed in a second separation-purification system 62 to obtain a recycle liquid or slurry containing a reduced solids concentration which is passed through conduit 44 without additional or separate hydrogenation to the slurry mix tank 12. The coal-derived liquid solvent recycled through conduit 44 has a normal boiling point ranging from about 400° F. to about 1100° F., with at least about 50 W% of the solvent material having a normal boiling point above about 975° F. Also, the slurry liquid from conduit 42 is processed in the second system 62 as desired to remove ash and insoluble materials through conduit 45, and to remove product liquids, i.e., distillate hydrocarbon liquids, through conduit 46. 
     The recovered hydrogen is recycled into the process through conduit 16 to preheater 18, where it is heated prior to being passed through conduit 19 into the bottom of the first reactor 20. This arrangement including make-up hydrogen at 17 as needed provides the hydrogen needed in the continuous process of the present invention. 
     The present invention and its advantages are further illustrated by the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting for the scope of the invention. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Present and Single Stage Coal Liquefaction Processes 
     In order to show the effectiveness of the present process, a comparison was made between the present process and a single stage H-Coal®, coal liquefaction process. The conditions and process yield results of the two processes are provided below in Table 1. In both cases, Illinois No. 6 coal from Burning Star mine and known to be relatively difficult to liquefy, was processed and liquefied. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________Comparison of Continuous Process ResultsFor Burning StarIllinois No. 6 Coal            Present            Process                   H-Coal ®______________________________________Reaction Conditions1st stage temperature, °F.              5501st stage reaction time, min.              301st stage H.sub.2 pressure, psig              20002nd stage temperature, °F.              800      8502nd stage reaction time, min.              30       302nd stage H.sub.2 pressure, psig              2000     2250YIELDS, W % Dry CoalC.sub.1 -C.sub.3 Gas              7.2      9.9C.sub.4 -400° F. Liquid              15.4     19.8400-650° F. Liquid              19.8     18.6650-975° F. Liquid              21.1     10.0975° F.+ Material              11.8     19.5Total C.sub.4 -975° F. Liquid              56.3     48.4Hydrogen Consumption              4.6      5.2Coal Conversion    93.0*    94.0H.sub.2 O, H.sub.2 S, NH.sub.3, etc.              13.0     9.9Ash                11.8     11.5______________________________________ *Not Optimized 
    
     As shown in Table 1 above, the present process yields less hydrocarbon gas, more distillate liquid, less 975° F.+ bottoms fractions, more heteroatom gases, and consumes less hydrogen than in the single reaction stage H-Coal process. These results, as shown in Table 1, were obtained at a lower maximum temperature and hydrogen partial pressure for the present process than those employed in the conventional H-Coal process. 
     The results listed in Tables 1, 2 and 3 are for approximately the same catalyst age. Table 2, below, shows a further comparison between the present process and a single stage H-Coal process operated at the conditions listed in Table 1. These results show that there is less heteroatom sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the products i.e., product fractions from the present process than in the products from the conventional single stage H-Coal process. The advantages of the present process over the single stage H-Coal process, which were operated at the conditions listed above in Table 1, are shown below in Table 3. The higher C 4  -975° F. distillate yields and lower hydrogen consumptions result in a much higher hydrogen efficiency for the present process as compared to the single stage H-Coal process. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________Comparative Heteroatom Removal For Single Stage Vs. TwoStage Catalytic-Catalytic Process                   Present           H-Coal ®                   Process______________________________________Sulfur, in Products W %C.sub.4 -400° F.             0.04      0.05400-650° F.             0.05      0.03650-975° F.             0.18      0.05Nitrogen, in Products W %C.sub.4 -400° F.             0.16      0.09400-650° F.             0.55      0.19650-975° F.             0.97      0.60______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________Process Efficiency                       Present               H-Coal ®                       Process______________________________________C.sub.4 -975° F. YieldsAs W % of Dry Coal    47        56Hydrogen EfficiencyExpressed As Ratio of C.sub.4 -975° F. yieldTotal Hydrogen Consumed                 9.6       12.2______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Present and Two Stage Thermal/Catalytic Liquefaction Processes 
     In order to further illustrate the effectiveness of the present process, a comparison was made between the present process and a two stage thermal/catalytic liquefaction process. The operating parameters and yields for the present process and the thermal/catalytic two stage process are provided below in Table 4. In both cases, Burning Star, Illinois No. 6 coal was processed and liquefied. The results of Table 4 are for a comparable catalyst age. 
     
                       TABLE 4______________________________________Comparison of Continuous Process ResultsFor Burning StarIllinois No. 6 Coal                   Thermal/            Present                   Catalytic            Process                   Two-Stage______________________________________Reaction Conditions1st stage temperature, °F.              550      8501st stage reaction time, min.              30       301st stage H.sub.2 pressure, psig              2000     22502nd stage temperature, °F.              800      7702nd stage reaction time, min.              30       302nd stage H.sub.2 pressure, psig              2000     2250Yields, W % Dry CoalC.sub.1 -C.sub.3, Gas              7.2      7.2C.sub.4 -400° F. Liquid              15.2     17.4400-975° F. 40.9     34.0975° F.+    11.8     15.8Total C.sub.4 -975° F. Liquid              56.3     51.4Hydrogen Consumption              4.6      5.1Coal Conversion    93.0*    94.0H.sub.2 O, H.sub.2 S, NH.sub.3, etc.              13.0     12.8Ash                11.8     11.7______________________________________ *Not Optimized 
    
     As shown in Table 4, equivalent gas yields and light distillates C 4  -400° F. fractions yields are obtained, but more diesel and heavy distillate vacuum gas oil fractions are obtained from the present process than from the thermal/catalytic process. In addition, total distillate yields are increased and total 975° F.+ bottoms yields are decreased for the present process as compared to the thermal/catalytic process. 
     A comparison of the heteroatom contents for the various product cuts from the thermal/catalytic and present process are listed below in Table 5. These results show that the present process produces less heteroatom sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the various product cuts or fractions. The process efficiencies for coal liquefaction and hydrogen consumption for the two processes are listed below in Table 6. These results show that higher distillate yields and lower hydrogen consumption results in better process conversion product fractions hydrogen efficiency for the present process than for the thermal/catalytic process. 
     
                       TABLE 5______________________________________Comparative Heteroatom RemovalForTwo Stage Processes              Thermal/              Catalytic                      Present              Two-Stage                      Process______________________________________Sulfur, in Product Fractions W %C.sub.4 -400° F.                0.16      0.05400-650° F.   0.10      0.03650-975° F.   0.16      0.05Nitrogen, in Product Fractions W %C.sub.4 -400° F.                0.07      0.09400-650° F.   0.25      0.19650-975° F.   0.64      0.60______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________Process Efficiency Comparison             Thermal/             Catalytic                     Present             Two Stage                     Process______________________________________C.sub.4 -975° F. yieldAs W % of dry coal  52        56Hydrogen EfficiencyExpressed as ratio of C.sub.4 -975° F.total hydrogen consumed               10.6      12.2______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Comparison of Present Process With Existing Coal Liquefaction Processes 
     In order to show the effectiveness of the present process, a comparison was made of a run of the present process for the liquefaction of coal, with runs of existing coal liquefaction processes: H-Coal®, Chevron Coal Liquefaction (CCLP); Solvent Refined Coal I (SRC I); and SRC II. In all cases, Burning Star, Illinois No. 6 coal was processed and liquefied. The operating conditions for the various runs were similar and comparable to those for the present and H-Coal® processes, listed above in Table I of Example 1. The results and yields for the various processes are provided below in Table 7. 
     
                                           TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________Yield of Burning Star Illinois No. 6 Coal(All quantities expressed in Wt % AF coal)     PresentFraction  Process          H-Coal ®                CCLP* SRC I**                           SRC II**__________________________________________________________________________NH.sub.3, H.sub.2 S, H.sub.2 O,     12   11    15    10   12CO, CO.sub.2C.sub.1 -C.sub.3 Gases     8    11    7     7    17C.sub.4 -400° F.     19   23    9     NA   11400-650° F.     24   22    26    NA   10650-975° F.     26   12    29    NA   23C.sub.4 -975° F.     69   56    64    12   44950° F.+     10   21    9     63   26Unconverted Coal     6    6     10    8    4H.sub.2 Consumption     5    5     5     3    3Total     105  105   105   103  103__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
    
    
    
    
     As shown above in Table 7, the present process gives higher distillate yields of (C 4  -975° F.) fraction than any reported process. Less 975° F.+ bottoms yield and higher hydrogen efficiency are also observed for the present process. Also, the results for the present process were obtained at lower hydrogen partial pressures than those employed in the single stage H-Coal® process. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Comparison of Present and H-Coal® Batch Processes 
     In order to further illustrate the overall effectiveness of the present process catalytic reaction, batch processes runs comparing the present two-stage process and the single stage H-Coal® process were made. The conditions and yields of both batch process runs are provided below in Table 8, which shows that appreciably higher yields of soluble hydrocarbon materials are provided by the present process. 
     Also, in FIG. 2 below, the effectiveness of the present process is demonstrated for the conversion of Burning Star Illinois No. 6 coal as compared to that of the single-stage H-Coal® process. The processes in both runs A and B use a standard Co/Mo catalyst, whereas in run C a different Co/Mo catalyst, i.e., AMOCAT 1A is used. The results, i.e., yield distributions, are set forth as conversion to solubles in various solvents such as cyclohexane, toluene, and tetrahydrofuran. 
     The results provided in FIG. 2 show that for a given thermal severity in the 2nd stage reaction, the present process yields higher conversions to various solubles than does the conventional H-Coal® process at the same severity. An increase of about 20% in cyclohexane solubilities is obtained. Increases in toluene solubilities range from about 15 to about 20% and increases in tetrahydrofuran solubles (a measure of total conversion) range about 5 to 10%. Table 8 lists the yields from Illinois No. 6 Burning Star Coal in the batch tests. These results show the superiority of the present process over the H-Coal® process. The total conversions of coal for tetrahydrofuran solubles is 6% higher for the present process, for cyclohexane solubles is 23% higher for the present process, and maximum obtained toluene solubles are 20% higher in the present process than for the H-Coal® process. The total higher percent conversion of coal for the present process, as shown in FIG. 2 are: (1) 6% higher for tetrahydrofuran solubles; (2) 23% higher for cyclohexane solubles; and (3) 20% higher for toluene solubles than for the single stage H-Coal process. 
     
                                           TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________Maximum Comparative Yields for IllinoisNo. 6 Coal in Batch Tests         H-Coal ® Process                  Present Process__________________________________________________________________________Yields, W % MAFCyclohexane Solubles         67       90Toluene Solubles         73       93Tetrahydrofuran Solubles         90       96Reaction Conditions1st Stage Temperature, °F.         --       5501st Stage Time min.         --       601st Stage Pressure, psi         --       20002nd Stage Temperature, °F.         830      8002nd Stage Time min.         30       602nd Stage Pressure, psi         2000     2000__________________________________________________________________________ ##STR1## 
    
     In FIG. 3, below, the effect of pressure on the present process is illustrated. Batch runs were made on Illinois No. 6 coal with cobalt/molybdenum catalyst at hydrogen partial pressure of 500, 1,000, and 2,000 psig. As shown, the yields of solubles at for 500 pounds per square inch pressure in the present two-stage process conducted at 550° F. in the first stage for a 30 minute residence time, and 800° F. and 30 minutes residence time in the second stage, are greater than those obtained for the single stage H-Coal® processing at 500 psig hydrogen partial pressure, 800° F. temperature and 60 minutes residence time. Thus, it follows that the present process can be operated at lower pressures than the conventional single-stage H-Coal® process and still obtain higher yields of desired hydrocarbon liquids. ##STR2## 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Present and H-Coal® Processes For Conversion of Various Coals 
     In order to show the effectiveness of the present process for processing different coals, runs were made using the present process and the conventional single stage H-Coal® process for both Burning Star, Illinois No. 6 coal and a low volatile coal. The operating conditions for both the present and H-Coal® processes were the same as those listed above in Table I of Example 1. The results of these tests are illustrated below in FIG. 4, and are presented on a conversion to various solubles bases, i.e., conversion to cyclohexane solubles, toluene solubles, and tetrahydrofuran solubles. The cross-hatched bars represent equivalent second stage thermal severities for the various tests. The open bars represent the maximum obtained conversion for the individual processes. 
     In FIG. 4, no maximum conversion data is illustrated for the low volatile coal since these results represent a single data point. The data in FIG. 4 indicates that the low volatile coal is less reactive under the conventional H-Coal® process than Illinois No. 6 Burning Star coal. On the other hand, the results for the present process show that the low volatile coal is as reactive as the Illinois No. 6 coal, and yields far more solubles than the conventional H-Coal® process yields with this coal. Thus, in the present process, an unreactive low volatile bituminous coal is made as reactive as highly reactive Burning Star, Illinois No. 6 coal. ##STR3## 
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Present, H-Coal®, and Thermal/Catalytic Processes 
     A series of runs were made to show the effectiveness of the present process in the conversion of a high rank, medium volatile bituminous, high ash coal. The present process was compared to a conventional single stage H-Coal® process and to a two-stage thermal/catalytic process in small batch runs for raw and cleaned coals. The operating conditions for the different processes were as follows: 
     
         ______________________________________           Processes                      Thermal/Conditions        H-Coal ®                      Catalytic                               Present______________________________________1st Stage Temperature, °F.                      550      5501st Stage Reaction Time, Min.                      30       301st Stage Pressure, psi    2000     20002nd Stage Temperature, °F.             850      850      8002nd Stage Reaction Time, Min             30       30       302nd Stage Pressure, psi             2250     2250     2000______________________________________ 
    
     The results of the various runs are illustrated and set forth below in FIG. 5. The illustrated results of FIG. 5, show that on an ash free basis, the present process yields higher conversions to cyclohexane, toluene and tetrahydrofuran (THF) solubles than does the H-Coal® process or the thermal/catalytic process. For this coal a 17% increase in cyclohexane solubles, a 12% increase in toluene solubles and a 1 to 3% increase in the THF solubles, are observed for the present process over the H-Coal® process. Thus, the present process is effective in converting a high rank, medium volatile bituminous coal to solubles and hydrocarbon liquid products. ##STR4## 
     EXAMPLE 7 
     Present, One Stage Thermal, H-Coal®; Thermal/Thermal; and Thermal/Catalytic Processes 
     A series of runs were made to show the effectiveness of the present process in the conversion of a highly unreactive, Western Canadian sub-bituminous coal. The series of runs compared the effectiveness of the present process with (1) one-stage thermal (2) H-Coal®, (3) two-stage thermal/thermal and (4) two-stage thermal/catalytic processes. In comparing these processes small batch tests were conducted, employing a heavy petroleum resid as a solvent for the coal. 
     The operating conditions for the different processes were as follows: 
     
         __________________________________________________________________________          Processes                     Thermal/                          Thermal/Conditions     Thermal               H-Coal ®                     Thermal                          Catalytic                               Present__________________________________________________________________________1st Stage Temperature, °F.                     550  550  5501st Stage Reaction Time, Min                     30   30   301st Stage H.sub.2 Pressure, psig                     2000 2000 20002nd Stage Temperature, °F.          850  850   800  800  8002nd Stage Reaction Time, Min          30   30    30   30   302nd Stage H.sub.2 Pressure, psig          2000 2250  2000 2000 2000__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     The results of the comparative tests as illustrated below in FIG. 6, are based on a total slurry solubles of solubility on a M.A.F. basis. The results of the present process run show an increase of slurry 11% cyclohexane solubles, 11% toluene solubles and 11% tetrahydrofuran solubles over those produced by the H-Coal® process. Also, the results show that for the present process, 100% tetrahydrofuran solubility is obtained. This indicates that all the coal is convertible to tetrahydrofuran solubles in the present process, but is not convertible in any other test mode shown. Also, a higher conversion to cyclohexane and toluene solubles were obtained for the present process than for any other process mode. ##STR5##