Abstract:
A system ( 10 ) for and method of testing a device under test (DUT) ( 12 ) having a plurality of probe pads ( 14 ) utilizing a dual probe technique to overcome contact resistance that may be present. The system comprises a plurality of sensing probes ( 30 ) and a plurality of forcing probes ( 32 ) arranged in pairs consisting of one sensing probe and one forcing probe. Each pair of sensing and forcing probes is provided for contacting one of the probe pads on the DUT. Each forcing probe is in electrical communication with a power supply ( 20 ) via a switching matrix ( 24 ), and each sensing probe is in electrical communication with a voltage meter ( 52 ) via the switching matrix. During testing, at least one of the power supplies provides a voltage to a corresponding forcing probe in contact with a particular probe pad. The sensing electrode at that particular probe pad senses a voltage, which is measured by the voltmeter and is used by a feedback controller ( 56 ) to adjust the voltage supplied by the corresponding power supply to the forcing probe.

Description:
FIELD OF INVENTION  
         [0001]    The present invention relates generally to the field of post-manufacturing testing of microelectronic devices. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a system for and method of testing a microelectronic device using probe card having two probes for contacting each contact pad of the microelectronic device.  
         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0002]    As manufacturers continually reduce the size of microelectronic devices contained in very large scale integration (VLSI) integrated circuits (ICs), it is becoming more difficult to test these devices to determine whether or not they function properly. This is so because as the size of the devices decreases, the electrical resistance through these devices also decrease. Therefore, the sensitivity of the test measurements, and, relatedly, accuracy of the electrical signals reaching the devices during testing, must increase accordingly.  
           [0003]    However, the use of copper-based metallurgy in microelectronic devices increases the difficulty of providing the devices with an accurate signal. Unlike test connection made to the aluminum probe pads of microelectronic devices having aluminum-based metallurgy, test connections made to copper probe pads are problematic due to the formation of layers of copper oxide on the probe pads and the test probes. These copper oxide layers increase the contact resistance between the test probes and probe pads, decreasing the voltage applied across the devices. The reduction in voltage decreases the accuracy and sensitivity of the measurements made during testing and often leads to false failure determinations.  
           [0004]    The resistance caused by the layers of copper oxide and other materials is commonly referred to as contamination resistance. Various systems and methods have been developed for measuring contamination resistance. For example, Japanese Publication No. 11-133075 is directed to a system for and method of determining whether or not the contamination resistance of one or more probe pads is too large to obtain useful measurement data from a device under test (DUT). The system comprises a probe card having a plurality of probes, or needles, for testing a device under test (DUT) having a plurality of probe pads. The probe card provides a pair of probes for contacting each probe pad of the DUT. The pair of probes associated with each probe pad are spaced from one another and contact the corresponding probe pad at different locations.  
           [0005]    The method disclosed in Japanese Publication No. 11-133075 includes passing a current via the pair of probes through the probe pad to determine the contact resistance, which is substantially equal to the contamination resistance. If the contact resistance is higher than a predetermined value, further testing of the DUT does not take place, since any measurement made in the presence of the excessive contact resistance would fall outside the acceptable range. A drawback of this method is that testing is a two-stage process. First, the Kelvin testing is performed on each probe pad to determine the level of contamination resistance. Then, if the results of the Kelvin probing are satisfactory, testing of the devices in the DUT proceeds. Another drawback of the method is that the determination made is only binary. Further testing is either performed or not based upon the magnitude of the contact resistance.  
           [0006]    A similar method of checking contact resistance during testing of a DUT is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,002 to Fasnacht et al. Fasnacht et al. disclose that contact resistance may be measured using a Kelvin connection and an impulse pulse generated by a transformer driven by a microprocessor. Although Fasnacht et al. state that contact resistance testing may be made concurrently with testing of the IC contained within the DUT, similar to the method disclosed in Japanese Publication No. 11-133075, the results are still binary. Either the contact resistance is too high and testing of the IC produces false results or contact resistance is within an acceptable range and testing of the IC produces acceptable results.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0007]    In one aspect, the present invention is directed to a system for testing a DUT having a plurality of probe pads. The system comprises a forcing probe for contacting and applying a first electrical signal to a first one of the plurality of probe pads. A sensing probe is provided for contacting the first one of the plurality of probe pads and sensing a second electrical signal at the first one of the plurality of probe pads. A variable power supply is in electrical communication with the forcing probe and the sensing probe. The variable power supply is capable of adjusting the first electrical signal based upon the second electrical signal.  
           [0008]    In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a method of testing a DUT having a plurality of probe pads. The method includes the steps of providing a first electrical signal to one of the plurality of probe pads. A second electrical signal is then sensed at the one of the plurality of probe pads. The first electrical signal is adjusted based upon the second electrical signal. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0009]    For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show forms of the invention that are presently preferred. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings.  
         [0010]    [0010]FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a microelectronic device testing system according to the present invention.  
         [0011]    [0011]FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the probe card and DUT as taken along line  2 - 2  of FIG. 1. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
       [0012]    Referring now to the drawings, wherein like numerals indicate like elements, FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate in accordance with the present invention a system  10  for testing a device under test (DUT)  12  following manufacture of the DUT to determine whether or not the ICs (not shown) and/or particular microelectronic devices aboard the DUT function within design tolerances. As described below, system  10  allows DUT  12  to be tested under design power conditions and without the need to test each probe pad  14 A-F to determine whether or not the contact resistance at each probe pad is within an acceptable range prior to performing operational testing of the DUT.  
         [0013]    DUT  12  comprises a plurality of probe pads  14 A-F, which permit testing of the various microelectronic devices (not shown) contained within the DUT. DUT  12  may be a semiconductor- and/or superconductor-based device comprising any one or more of various microelectronic devices such as memory (e.g., DRAM or SRAM) and logic (e.g., ASICs, microcontrollers, microprocessors, and FPGAs), among others. Preferably, DUT  12  is tested while it is a die on a wafer (not shown). However, DUT may be tested after dicing. System  10  is particularly suited for use with microelectronic devices having copper-based metallurgy, which is readily subject to test degradation due to buildup of copper oxide films on probe pads as well as test probes. However, system  12  may be used to test microelectronic devices utilizing conductors made of other materials, such as aluminum.  
         [0014]    In the embodiment shown, probe pads  14 A-F are arranged in a linear array. However, probe pads  14 A-F may be arranged in any configuration suited to the particular architecture of DUT  12 . Probe pads  14 A-F are connected to the various structures contained in DUT  12  by wires  16  (FIG. 2) formed within DUT during manufacturing. One skilled in the art will appreciate the variety of types and structures of DUTs that may be tested using a system of the present invention.  
         [0015]    System  10  generally comprises a probe card  18 , a plurality of power supplies  20 , a plurality of sensing instruments  22  and a switch matrix  24  connecting the probe card to the power supplies and sensing instruments. Probe card  18  comprises a substrate  26  having an opening  28  through which extend a plurality of sensing probes  30 A-F and a plurality of forcing probes  32 A-F. Sensing and forcing probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F are preferably made of tungsten or other suitable refractory metals and alloys thereof, and are attached at their proximal ends  34  (FIG. 2) to substrate  26  at upper surface  36 . In alternative embodiments, probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F may be attached to lower surface  38  of substrate  26 . Sensing and forcing probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F cantilever first toward and then through opening  28  such that when the sensing and forcing probes are in contact with one or more corresponding probe pads  14 A-F, lower surface  38  of substrate  26  is spaced from DUT  12 .  
         [0016]    Each pair of substantially opposing sensing and forcing probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F contacts a corresponding probe pad  14 A-F during testing of DUT  12 . Accordingly, distal ends  40  of substantially opposing sensing and forcing probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F are located proximate one another but are separated by a sufficient distance such that they do not contact one another at any time, and particularly when brought into contact with probe pad  14  when the contact force between the probes and the probe pads may tend to cause the distal ends of the probes to displace toward one another.  
         [0017]    Each probe  30 A-F,  32 A-F is in electrical communication with a wire conductor  42  patterned onto the upper surface  36  of substrate  26 . Conductors  42  connect probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F to a corresponding one of a pair of interface connection points  44 , each of which is in electrical communication with switch matrix  24  via a parallel conductor cable  46  containing an electrically isolated conductor for each corresponding forcing probe or sensing probe. Although probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F are connected to switch matrix  24  in the manner shown, one skilled in the are will appreciate the variety of ways of electrically interconnecting the probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F and switch matrix  24  such that each probe has a dedicated connection to the switch matrix.  
         [0018]    Sensing probes  30 A-F and forcing probes  32 A-F are suitably arranged in a pair of linear arrays to match the linear array of probe pads  14 A-F. One skilled in the art will recognize that sensing probes  30  and forcing probes  32  may be arranged in any configuration that suits the arrangement of corresponding probe pad  14 . In addition, although probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F are shown as being needle-type probes, they may be other types of probes, such as vane probes or whisker probes. In a presently preferred embodiment, probe card  18  comprises a 1×25 linear array of sensing probes  30  and a 1×25 linear array of forcing probes  32 . However, for clarity and simplicity, probe card is shown containing only a 1×6 linear array of sensing probes  30 A-F and a 1×6 linear array of forcing probes  32 A-F. One skilled in the art will recognize that any number of sensing probes  30  and forcing probes  32  may be provided.  
         [0019]    In the embodiment of system  10  shown in FIG. 1, power supplies  20  and sensing instruments  22  are preferably grouped into four source measurement units (SMUs)  48 A-D and two voltage supply units (VSUs)  50 A-B. Each SMU  48  comprises one power supply  20  and one sensing instrument  22  that contains a voltmeter  52  and a current meter  54 . Each VSU  50  comprises one power supply  20  and one sensing instrument  22  that contain one voltmeter  52 . Each SMU  48 A-D and VSU  50 A-B contains a feedback controller  56  for allowing each power supply  20  to provide a variable strength output signal to a corresponding one of the forcing probes  32 A-F. The strength of the output signal from each power supply  20  is dependent upon the magnitude of the voltage measured by corresponding voltmeter  52  contained in the same SMU  48 A-D or VSU  50 A-B. The functions of SMUs  48 A-D and VSUs  50 A-B are more particularly described below in connection with a description of the operation of system  10 .  
         [0020]    In a preferred embodiment, which is generally illustrated in FIG. 1, SMUs  48 A-D and VSUs  50 A-B may form a single equipment package, such as a Semiconductor Parameter Analyzer model no. HP 4155 B available from Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, Calif.  
         [0021]    Although power supplies  20 , sensing instruments  22  and feedback controllers  56  are grouped as SMUs  48 A-D and VSUs  50 A-B, one skilled in art will understand that these components may be stand-alone components connected to one another either directly or through one or more other components, such as a system controller (not shown), e.g., a central processing unit, to provide the necessary functions described below. In addition, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the particular numbers of SMUs  48  and VSUs  50  shown are illustrative only. Any number of SMUs  48  and VSUs  50  may be used to suit a particular application.  
         [0022]    Each power supply  20  and each sensing instrument  22  is independently connected to switch matrix  24 , which allows each probe  30 A-F,  32 A-F to be connected to one of the power supplies, and one of the sensing instruments or ground  58  as required by a particular test. One skilled in the art will readily understand the structure, operation and function of switch matrix  24 , and thus these aspects need not be described in detail herein. In a preferred embodiment, switch matrix may be a Keithley Model No.  707  available from Keithley Instruments Inc., Cleveland, Ohio. If system  10  is not configurable, i.e., each probe  30 A-F,  32 A-F is permanently connected to a particular power supply  20 , sensing instrument  22  or ground  58 , switch matrix  24  may be eliminated from the system.  
         [0023]    The function of SMUs  48 A-D and VSUs  50 A-B will become readily apparent in light of the following example. In this example, DUT  12  contains a plurality of FETs (not shown) and other microelectronic devices (not shown). As known to those skilled in the art, an FET is generally characterized as a four terminal device. These four terminals are: (1) a drain; (2) a source; (3) a gate; and (4) a substrate. During testing, it is desirable to test an FET at conditions as close as practicable to the conditions it will experience during normal operation of the DUT  12  when installed in its intended operating environment. Accordingly, the performance of FET should be modeled as accurately as possible with respect to design/operating conditions.  
         [0024]    One test that may be performed on the FET under test is to measure the channel current between the source and drain at various gate and substrate bias voltages while the bias voltages at the source and drain remain constant. In this manner, a performance graph of channel current versus gate voltage may be obtained.  
         [0025]    To perform such a test, probe pads  14 A-F of DUT  12  are connected to the following terminals: probe pad  14 A is connected to the drain of the FET under test; probe pad  14 B is connected to the source of the FET under test; probe pad  14 C is connected to the gate of the FET under test; probe pad  14 D is connected to the substrate of FET under test; probe pad  14 E is connected to the gate of an FET adjacent the FET under test; and probe pad  14 F is connected to the drain of the FET adjacent the FET under test. Accordingly, to test the FET under test, probe card  18  is moved toward DUT  12  until probes  30 A-F,  32 A-F contact the respective probe pads  14 A-F, and switch matrix  24  is configured so that: SMU  48 A is in electrical communication with probe pad  14 A; SMU  48 B is in electrical communication with probe pad  14 B; SMU  48 C is in electrical communication with probe pad  14 C; SMU  48 D is in electrical communication with probe pad  14 D; VSU  50 A is in electrical communication with probe pad  14 E; and VSU  50 B is in electrical communication with probe pad  14 F.  
         [0026]    When switch matrix  24  has been properly set, a test upon DUT  12  to measure the performance of the FET under test may be performed as follows. In this example, each of the bias voltages and ranges of bias voltages experienced by the particular element of the FET under test is equivalent to the corresponding design voltage or range of voltage for that particular element. During the test, it is desired accomplish the following: bias the drain of the FET under test at +2 volts; ground the source of the FET under test so that it remains at zero volts; bias the gate of the FET under test in a range of 0 volts to +2 volts in ½ volt increments; bias the substrate of the FET under test in a range of 0 volts to −2 volts in ½ volt increments in sync with the biasing of the gate; bias the gate of the FET adjacent the FET under test to +10 volts, which closes the gate of the adjacent FET; ground the drain of the FET adjacent the FET under test; and measure the channel current of the FET under test at each of the foregoing ½ volt increments.  
         [0027]    To begin the test, power supply  20  of SMU  48 A is energized. At first, a low power forcing signal is sent to corresponding forcing probe  32 A in contact with probe pad  14 A such that the voltage sensed at sensing probe  30 A in contact with probe pad  14 A by voltmeter  52  of of SMU  48 A is less than +2 volts. Feedback controller  56  within SMU  48 A sends a feedback signal to power supply  20  of SMU  48 A that increases the magnitude of the forcing signal sent to forcing probe  14 A. The feedback process continues until voltage meter  20  of SMU  48 A indicates a voltage of +2 volts. Depending upon the amount of contact resistance between forcing probe  32 A and probe pad  14 A due to contamination on the probe pad or the forcing probe, the actual voltage applied to the forcing probe may be in a range ofjust over +2 volts to about +4 volts. The impedance of the sensing probe  30 A, however, is relatively large, e.g., and is typically on the order of 106 ohms. Such a high impedance renders the contact resistance between probe pad  14 A and sensing probe  30 A negligible. Thus, when the voltage measured at voltmeter  52  of SMU  48 A is +2 volts, the drain of the FET under test is biased at substantially +2 volts. This voltage is held constant during the entire test.  
         [0028]    Power supply  20  of SMU  48 B, and therefore forcing probe  32 B and the source of the FET under test, is grounded, e.g., to ground  58 . Thus, the voltage measured at voltmeter  52  of SMU  48 B is zero. Ground at the source of the FET under test is maintained during the entire test. Power supplies  20  of SMUs  48 C,  48 D are energized in a manner similar to the power supply of SMU  48 A, exceptto different voltages. That is, the voltages at sensing probes  30 C,  30 D are measured at corresponding voltmeters  52  of SMUs  48 C,  48 D and forcing signals from corresponding power supplies  20  are adjusted accordingly via feedback from the voltmeters. Feedback adjustment of the forcing signals is performed for each ½ volt increment in the desired range. In this manner, the gate and substrate of FET under test are biased in substantially the desired ½ volt increments.  
         [0029]    Similar to power supply  20  of SMU  48 A, the power supply of VSU  50 A is energized and adjusted via corresponding feedback controller  56  based upon a signal from voltmeter  52  contained in VSU  50 A until the voltage measured by the voltmeter is +10 volts. In this manner, the gate of the FET adjacent the FET under test is biased to +10 volts to close the gate. The +10 volt bias is maintained during the entire testing of DUT  12 . Power supply  20  of VSU  50 B is grounded, e.g., to ground  58  during the test. Grounding power supply  20  of VSU  50 B maintains the drain of adjacent gate at zero volts to reduce noise in the measured signals.  
         [0030]    As mentioned above, the goal of the test of the present example is to measure the channel current in the FET at ½ volt increments in the bias voltages applied to the gate and substrate of FET. Thus, at each ½ volt increment, one, the other or both current meters  54  of SMUs  48 A,  48 B may be used to measure the channel current from the source of the FET under test to the drain of the FET under test.  
         [0031]    As will be understood by one skilled in the art, each SMu  48  not used to measure current could be replaced with a VSU  50  or a variable power supply that does not have a voltmeter. Also, all VSUs  50  could be replaced with SMUs  48  such that system  10  only includes SMUs, although this may unnecessarily increase the total cost of the system. All that is required under the present invention is that each pair of forcing probes  32  and sensing probes  30  used to apply a particular voltage be in suitable electrical communication with a variable power supply capable of adjusting the magnitude of the electrical signal applied to the respective forcing probe based upon a signal sensed at corresponding sensing probe.  
         [0032]    While system  10  has been described in the context of testing an FET in a DUT  12 , the invention is not so limited. System  10  is particularly suited for testing elements of any microelectronic device where probe pad contact resistance may adversely affect test results, e.g., where the elements, such as abi-polar devices, tested have relatively low resistance and, therefore, draw a relatively high current. Such elements may be part of any of a number of microelectronic devices, such as the logic devices and memory devices mentioned above.  
         [0033]    While the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not so limited. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.