Abstract:
A program-controlled unit includes a selection device which can determine whether the program-controlled unit is to be emulated by using a first emulation unit or by using a second emulation unit. As a result, it is possible to provide a mass production version of the program-controlled unit with an emulation unit having a reduced functional and/or performance scope. Therefore, an emulatable mass production version of the program-controlled unit can be made available which is only insignificantly more expensive, if at all, than a non-emulatable version.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       Field of the Invention  
         [0001]    The present invention relates to a program-controlled unit.  
           [0002]    Program-controlled units such as microprocessors, microcontrollers and signal processors, etc. have been known in innumerable embodiments for many years and need no further explanation.  
           [0003]    A known problem of program-controlled units is that it is often not simple to identify, localize and eliminate errors which occur.  
           [0004]    For this purpose, use is often made of a so-called emulator. An emulator is able to identify the occurrence of predeterminable states or events and to react to the occurrence of the relevant state or event in a likewise predeterminable manner.  
           [0005]    The predeterminable states or events include, for example, specific data, addresses or control signals being transferred or stored within or outside the program-controlled unit.  
           [0006]    The predeterminable reactions to the occurrence of such or other states or events include, for example, the stopping of the program-controlled unit, the read-out and/or the alteration of the contents of registers or internal or external memories, and/or the recording and evaluation of profiles of data, addresses, signals of interest, and/or register and memory contents, which occur beforehand and/or afterward.  
           [0007]    As is known, program-controlled units used in mass products, which are referred to below as mass production versions of the program-controlled unit for the sake of simplicity, cannot be emulated. That is because in those units there is only in part a possibility of access to the data, addresses, signals, registers and memories of interest, and because those units do not have the possibility of monitoring the occurrence of the states and events of interest in real time.  
           [0008]    Therefore, special versions in particular of more complex program-controlled units, which are able to do this, are produced. Those special versions of the program-controlled units are referred to below as emulation versions of the program-controlled unit.  
           [0009]    [0009]FIG. 1A shows a basic structure of the mass production version of a program-controlled unit, and FIG. 1B shows a structure of an emulation version of a program-controlled unit. These figures are described in greater detail below. It thus becomes clear that it is occasionally not possible or possible only with an enormous outlay to localize and eliminate unexpectedly occurring errors.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0010]    It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide a program-controlled unit, which overcomes the hereinaforementioned disadvantages of the heretofore-known devices of this general type, in which errors that occur can be localized and eliminated with a low outlay and which is not more expensive or is only slightly more expensive than a mass production version of a conventional program-controlled unit.  
           [0011]    With the objects of the invention in view, there is also provided a program-controlled unit, comprising a first emulation unit and a second emulation unit. A selection device connected to the first and second emulation units determines which of the first and second emulation units is to be used for emulating the program-controlled unit.  
           [0012]    This selection device makes it possible to provide a first emulation unit in the mass production version of the program-controlled unit, and to provide a further (second) emulation unit in the emulation version of the program-controlled unit. It also makes it possible to allow the control unit which controls the emulation to select the emulation unit which is to be used to effect emulation of the program-controlled unit.  
           [0013]    As a result, it is also possible to emulate the mass production version of the program-controlled unit.  
           [0014]    Since there is still a fully emulatable version of the program-controlled unit, there is no need for the first emulation unit provided in the mass production version to have to be able to perform everything that one or more emulation units of the emulation version have to be able to perform. In other words, the first emulation unit can be an emulation unit having limited functionality and/or limited performance. Such an emulation unit makes the mass production version of the program-controlled unit hardly any more expensive and nevertheless affords the possibility of emulating the mass production version to a certain extent.  
           [0015]    A program-controlled unit constructed in the manner described above opens up the possibility of localizing and eliminating errors that occur in the mass production version through the use of emulation. The mass production version is only insignificantly, if at all, more expensive than the mass production version of a conventional program-controlled unit.  
           [0016]    Other features which are considered as characteristic for the invention are set forth in the appended claims.  
           [0017]    Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in a program-controlled unit, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.  
           [0018]    The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0019]    [0019]FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a conventional mass production version of a program-controlled unit;  
         [0020]    [0020]FIG. 1B is a block diagram of a conventional emulation version of a program-controlled unit;  
         [0021]    [0021]FIG. 2A is a block diagram of a mass production version of a program-controlled unit which will be described in more detail below;  
         [0022]    [0022]FIG. 2B is a block diagram of an emulation version of a program-controlled unit which will be described in more detail below;  
         [0023]    [0023]FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the construction of an emulation interface of the program-controlled units shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B; and  
         [0024]    [0024]FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a security mechanism which can be used to prevent a situation wherein data are read from the program-controlled unit in an unauthorized manner through the emulation units of the program-controlled units shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. 
     
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS  
       [0025]    Referring now to the figures of the drawings in detail and first, particularly, to FIGS. 1A and 1B thereof, it is seen that FIG. 1A shows a basic construction of a mass production version of a program-controlled unit, and FIG. 1B shows a construction of an emulation version of the program-controlled unit.  
         [0026]    The mass production version shown in FIG. 1A contains a core  1 , peripheral units  2 ,  3  and  4  such as, for example, a timer, an A/D converter, a memory, etc., as well as a bus  5  interconnecting the core  1  and the peripheral units  2 ,  3 , and  4 . The core  1  furthermore contains an emulation interface  6 , through which an emulation unit provided in the emulation version of the program-controlled unit (see FIG. 1B) can be connected to the core  1 .  
         [0027]    The emulation version shown in FIG. 1B contains the mass production version, that is to say it likewise has the core  1 , the peripheral units  2 ,  3  and  4 , the bus  5  and the emulation interface  6 . However, the emulation version also has components additionally required for the emulation. Those components include an emulation unit  7 , debug resources  8  and a control interface  9 , through which the emulation unit  7  can be connected to a control unit  10  that is provided outside the program-controlled unit and controls the emulation.  
         [0028]    For the sake of completeness, it shall be noted that the emulation version of the program-controlled unit can include one or more semiconductor chips. In particular, the components required for the emulation can (but need not) be accommodated on a dedicated semiconductor chip which is connected to a chip containing the mass production version of the program-controlled unit. Such a program-controlled unit is described in German Published, Non-prosecuted Patent Application DE 197 43 264 A1.  
         [0029]    The emulation unit  7  contains, for example, a so-called breakpoint or watchpoint logic. The logic is required in order to set states or events, the occurrence of which is to be monitored, and in order to identify the occurrence of the states or events being monitored.  
         [0030]    The debug resources  8  contain, for example:  
         [0031]    a so-called overlay memory, in which it is possible to store programs and/or data that can be used during the emulation instead of the programs and/or data which are stored in the normally used memories; and  
         [0032]    a so-called monitor memory, in which debug sequences are stored that must be executed by the core in order to carry out specific actions required for the emulation.  
         [0033]    As a result of the additional components contained in the emulation version, the emulation version of the program-controlled unit is more expensive than the mass production version and, for this reason, is generally used only in the development phase. The less expensive mass production versions of the program-controlled unit are normally used in fully developed and sold apparatuses.  
         [0034]    However, the situation is not precluded in which errors that can be localized and eliminated only through the use of emulation can occur even in fully developed apparatuses. Nevertheless, emulation of the mass production version is not possible because it lacks the requisite components (emulation unit  7 , debug resources  8  and interface  9 ).  
         [0035]    Consequently, it is occasionally not possible, or possible only with an enormous outlay, to localize and eliminate unexpectedly occurring errors.  
         [0036]    A program-controlled unit according to the invention, which is described below, is distinguished by the fact that it contains a selection device, that can define whether the program-controlled unit is to be emulated using a first emulation unit or using a second emulation unit.  
         [0037]    A mass production version of such a program-controlled unit is shown in FIG. 2A, and an emulation version of such a program-controlled unit is shown in FIG. 2B.  
         [0038]    Like the conventional mass production version shown in FIG. 1A, the mass production version of the program-controlled unit which is shown in FIG. 2A contains a core  11 , peripheral units  12 ,  13  and  14  and a bus  15  interconnecting the core  11  and the peripheral units  12 ,  13  and  14 . There is additionally provided a (first) emulation unit  17 , an emulation interface  16  which is separate from the core  11  and is provided for connecting the first emulation unit  17  to the core  11 , and a (first) control interface  18  for connecting the first emulation unit  17  to a control unit  19  that is provided outside the program-controlled unit and controls the emulation. The core  11 , the peripheral units  12 ,  13  and  14 , and the bus  15  correspond to the core  1 , the peripheral units  2 ,  3  and  4  and the bus  5  of the configuration shown in FIG. 1A.  
         [0039]    The emulation version of the program-controlled unit which is shown in FIG. 2B contains the components of the mass production version of the program-controlled unit that are shown in FIG. 2A and have been described with reference thereto. The emulation version of the program-controlled unit additionally contains a second emulation unit  20 , debug resources  21  and a second control interface  22  for connecting the second emulation unit  20  to the control unit  19  which controls the emulation. The second emulation unit  20  and the debug resources  21  are connected to the core  11  through the same interface as the first emulation unit  17 , namely through the emulation interface  16 . The debug resources  21  correspond to the debug resources  8  of the emulation version in accordance with FIG. 1B. The second emulation unit  20  may correspond to the emulation unit  7  of the emulation version in accordance with FIG. 1B. However, as will be explained in more detail below, it preferably includes only part of the emulation unit  7 , more precisely only those components which are not already contained in the first emulation unit  17 .  
         [0040]    The emulation interface  16  contains the selection device already mentioned above. The selection device can define whether the program-controlled unit is to be emulated by using a first emulation unit or by using a second emulation unit. In this case, the first emulation unit is the first emulation unit  17  and, in this case, the second emulation unit is the second emulation unit  20 .  
         [0041]    It should already be pointed out at this juncture that the selection device need not be a constituent part of the emulation interface  16 . Instead, it may also be contained in another component of the program-controlled unit or be realized as a dedicated component of the program-controlled unit.  
         [0042]    A possible construction of the emulation interface  16  and of the selection device contained therein is illustrated in FIG. 3.  
         [0043]    The selection device is designated by reference symbol  23  in FIG. 3. In the example considered, what is involved is a changeover switch that is controlled by the control unit  19 , for example through an input and/or output terminal (pin or pad) of the program-controlled unit or in some other way.  
         [0044]    The selection device  23  decides whether a request output by the first emulation unit  17  or a request output by the second emulation unit  20  is forwarded to the core  11 . Data returned from the core  11  in response to a request on the part of the first emulation unit  17  or in response to a request on the part of the second emulation unit  20  are fed both to the first emulation unit  17  and to the second emulation unit  20 .  
         [0045]    As has already been mentioned above, the first emulation unit  17  and the second emulation unit  20  preferably together have the same functional scope as the emulation unit  7  of the conventional emulation version of the program-controlled circuit in accordance with FIG. 1B. It becomes clear from this that the first emulation unit  17  has a smaller functional scope than the emulation unit  7  of the emulation version of the program-controlled unit in accordance with FIG. 1B. This, and moreover the circumstance whereby the mass production version of the program-controlled unit contains no debug resources, opens up the possibility of creating a mass production version of a program-controlled unit which can be emulated but costs only insignificantly more than a non-emulatable mass production version.  
         [0046]    A further special feature of the program-controlled unit being considered is that such a unit has a security mechanism which prevents unauthorized persons from being able to read out secret data or programs from an internal memory device of the program-controlled unit by connecting a control unit  19  to the program-controlled unit.  
         [0047]    The construction of an emulation version of a program-controlled unit which has such a security mechanism is illustrated in FIG. 4.  
         [0048]    The emulation version shown in FIG. 4 is based on the emulation version shown in FIG. 2B and components designated by the same reference symbols designate identical or mutually corresponding components. By comparison with the emulation version shown in FIG. 2B, the emulation version shown in FIG. 4 additionally has a security mechanism  24  and a disabling element formed by an AND gate  25  in the example being considered.  
         [0049]    The AND gate  25  is provided between the emulation interface  16  and the core  11 , more precisely in a signal path through which requests originating from the emulation units  17  and  20  are forwarded to the core  11 . The AND gate  25  has two input terminals, to one of which the data output by the emulation interface  16  are fed, and to the other of which an enable signal of the security mechanism  24  is fed.  
         [0050]    The AND gate  25  allows the request data forwarded from the emulation interface  16  to the core  11  to pass if and as long as the enable signal of the security mechanism  24  has the value 1, and disables the transfer of the request data to the core  11  if the enable signal has the value 0.  
         [0051]    A specific code must be fed to the security mechanism  24  so that the enable signal generated by it assumes the value 1. If the correct code is not supplied, the enable signal has the value 0 and, even when an emulation version is involved, the program-controlled unit cannot be emulated and thus cannot be subjected to covert observation either. In the example considered, the specific code is fixedly set in the program-controlled unit and is disclosed only to quite specific persons, in particular to customer support personnel responsible for eliminating errors.  
         [0052]    There are various possibilities for the inputting of the code. The inputting can be effected through specific input and/or output terminals of the program-controlled unit or through the control unit  19 .