Abstract:
Provided are techniques for the orchestration of workflows such as, but not limited to, computer system server, storage, virtualization and cloud infrastructure management operations and tasks. The disclosed orchestration techniques support non-scripted native representations of the workflows and the addition of new object types or operation sets or services. The disclosed orchestration techniques support atomicity and transactional semantics of workflows and include the ability to configure parameters for execution of workflow, which influences, for example, error, temporal and automation semantics.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     The present application is a continuation and claims the benefit of the filing date of an application entitled, “Infrastructure Management Operational Workflows,” Ser. No. 13/168,998, filed Jun. 26, 2011, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and herein incorporated by reference. 
    
    
     FIELD OF DISCLOSURE 
     The claimed subject matter relates generally to Information Technology (IT) infrastructure management and, more specifically, to orchestration of workflows such as computer system server, storage, network, virtualization and cloud infrastructure resource management operations and tasks. 
     SUMMARY 
     Provided are techniques for the orchestration of workflows such as, but not limited to, computer system server, storage, network, virtualization and cloud infrastructure management operations and tasks. Today, many system and enterprise management software applications support some form of “orchestration,” which, simply stated, involves an execution of a sequence of simple or complex, but typically arbitrary, management operations, which is termed as “workflow.” However, most forms of orchestration do not support either non-scripted native representations of the workflows or the addition of new object types or operation sets or services. Workflows in existing orchestration software are also typically hard-coded and support invocation of arbitrary scripts or JAVA® operations that are typically opaque to an orchestration engine. As a result, existing orchestration cannot support either atomicity or transactional semantics of workflows. In addition, existing orchestration software lacks the ability to configure parameters for execution of workflow, which influences, for example, error, temporal and automation semantics. 
     Relational database servers have implemented “workflows” using relational operations that are orchestrated and automated at runtime. Arbitrary declarative workflow specifications are supported by most relational database servers via structured query language (SQL). For example, new relational tables may be added at any time without requiring the fundamental model to be re-coded. The procedural/operational model for SQL is called Relational Algebra, which is a set of well-defined set of relational database operations that support composition of such operations. 
     Provided are techniques for, but not limited to, normalizing a set of infrastructure resource states to create a plurality of normalized infrastructure resource states; normalizing a set of infrastructure resources to create a plurality of normalized infrastructure resources, each normalized infrastructure resource corresponding to one of the normalized infrastructure resource states of the plurality of normalized infrastructure resource states; normalizing a set of operations for acting on the normalized set of infrastructure resources to create a plurality of normalized operations, wherein an input and an output corresponding to each normalized operation of the plurality of normalized operations has a defined type of a plurality of types; composing the normalized operations into an operational sequence such that the output of each normalized operation becomes the input of another normalized operation, wherein a defined type corresponding to each particular input matches a defined type corresponding to the corresponding output; generating a workflow plan as a named composition of normalized operations with well-defined operational semantics corresponding to the normalized infrastructure resource states, normalized infrastructure resources and normalized operations; and executing the workflow plan by evaluating and applying the well-defined semantics to the operational sequence. 
     This summary is not intended as a comprehensive description of the claimed subject matter but, rather, is intended to provide a brief overview of some of the functionality associated therewith. Other systems, methods, functionality, features and advantages of the claimed subject matter will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       A better understanding of the claimed subject matter can be obtained when the following detailed description of the disclosed embodiments is considered in conjunction with the following figures, in which: 
         FIG. 1  is a block diagram of a resource and Infrastructure Management architecture that may support the claimed subject matter. 
         FIG. 2  is a block diagram of a Resource and Infrastructure Orchestration System (RIOS), first introduced in  FIG. 1 , in more detail. 
         FIG. 3  is a block diagram of normalized infrastructure resource states employed by the claimed subject matter. 
         FIG. 4  is a block diagram illustrating basic resource control that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 5  is block diagram illustrating deployment control that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 6  is a block diagram illustrating mobility control that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 7  is a block diagram illustrating group and composite control that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 8  is a block diagram illustrating availability control that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 9  is a block diagram illustrating durability control that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 10  is a block diagram illustrating a composition of normalized infrastructure operations that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 11  is a block diagram illustrating one example of a workflow employed according to the disclosed technology to create a redundant array of independent disks (RAID) resource object. 
         FIG. 12  is a block diagram of an Error Semantics that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. 
         FIG. 13  is a flow chart of a Setup Operation Workflow process that may implement aspects the claimed subject matter. 
         FIG. 14  is a flow chart of an Implement Operation Workflow process that may implement aspects the claimed subject matter. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon. 
     Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. 
     A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. 
     Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing. 
     Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user&#39;s computer, partly on the user&#39;s computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user&#39;s computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user&#39;s computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). 
     Aspects of the present invention are described below with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. 
     These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. 
     The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational actions to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. 
     Turning now to the figures,  FIG. 1  is a block diagram of an example of a resource and infrastructure management architecture  100  that may implement the claimed subject matter. A management server  102  includes a central processing unit (CPU), or “processor,”  104 , coupled to a monitor  106 , a keyboard  108  and a pointing device, or “mouse,”  110 , which together facilitate human interaction with computing system  100  and management server  102 . Also included in management server  102  and attached to management server  102  is a computer-readable storage medium (CRSM)  112 , which may either be incorporated into computing system  102  i.e. an internal device, or attached externally to management server  102  by means of various, commonly available connection devices such as but not limited to, a universal serial bus (USB) port (not shown). CRSM  112  is illustrated storing an operating system  114  and a Resource and Infrastructure Orchestration system (RIOS)  116  that may implement the claimed subject matter. 
     It should be noted that a management server  102  would typically include more elements than the illustrated components but for the sake of simplicity only the illustrated components are shown. RIOS  116  is described in more detail below in conjunction with  FIGS. 2-14 . 
     Management server  102  is connected to a management network  118 , which may be, among other options, a local area network (LAN) or the Internet. A data server  121 , coupled to a CRSM  122  and a CRSM  123 , is also communicatively coupled to a physical managed network  124 . Management network  118  provides connectivity between management server  102  and logical and virtual resource  130  and physical resources  120 . Examples of devices that may be included in logical and virtual resources  130  include, but are not limited to a hypervisor (HYVSR)  131 , a virtual memory (VM)  132 , a storage volume (SV)  133 , a virtual disk (VD)  134 , a virtual LAN (VLAN)  135 , a virtual communication Ethernet or FC port, or port,  136 , a virtual managed network  137 , a virtual switch (not shown) or a virtual Ethernet bridge (not shown). Examples of devices that may be included in physical resources  120  include, but are not limited to, an application server  125 , managed network  124 , data server  121  with attached CRSMs  122  and  123 , a CRSM  126  and a network adaptor (NA)  127 . Physical systems and resources may be connected to each other via physical managed network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, SAN or converged FCoE LAN. 
     Although in this example, management server  102 , logical and virtual resources  130  and physical resources  120  are communicatively coupled via management network  118 , they could also be coupled through any number of communication mediums such as, but not limited to, a wide area network (WAN) (not shown) and direct wire (not shown). Further, it should be noted there are many possible resource and infrastructure management system configurations, of which resource and infrastructure management architecture  100  is only one simple example. 
     Resources  120  and  130  represent a pool of virtual or logical resource elements of physical devices, or simply a “pool.” In the following examples, the devices of pool are used as examples of computing resources, or objects, that may be orchestrated by means of the claimed technology. Collections of similar objects, such as CRSM  122  and  123  are referred to as groups. Relationships among different objects, including groups, such as the relationships among server  121  and CRSM  122  and  123  are referred to as infrastructures or fabrics. A dotted line  138  indicates that logical and virtual resources  130  represent various configurations of physical resources  120 . 
     In addition, in the following example, the disclosed techniques are implemented by RIOS  116  executing on management server  102 . It should be understood that many types of resources, both hardware and software, and systems may benefit form the claimed subject matter but for the sake simplicity the examples are limited to the types and numbers of components described above. 
     As the Inventors herein have realized, a Resource and Infrastructure Management operational workflow can be written as a composition resource management operations with well-defined operational semantics and flexible enough to support any hardware and/or software infrastructure resource, including, for example, servers, storage, networks, virtualization elements and combinations thereof, including cloud elements. 
     Throughout the Specification, a “resource” may be an individual atomic or composite objects, physical, logical or virtual computing objects, networking, storage or virtualization objects. Typically, a resource may exist independently and/or may be provisioned independently. Examples of physical resources include server systems, storage systems, network switches, disk drives, adapters and so on. Examples of logical and virtual resources include virtual machines, storage volumes, files, virtual disks and so on. An atomic resource is one that cannot be divided. In a hierarchical definition, a resource may be a composite unit comprising other sub-resources. One examples of a composite resource type is a BladeCenter chassis. A group may be any collection of homogeneous or heterogeneous resources. Examples of groups include server pool, multi-pathing group, HA-redundant pair of network adapters, virtual machine collection and so on. A fabric is defined herein as an aggregate of typically logical connections between resources or groups of resources. Examples of fabrics include VLANs, FC SAN zones and so on. 
     In order to compose resource management operations the resource and infrastructure operational model supports the following:
         1) Normalized set of infrastructure resource states (see  FIG. 3 ): Normalizing the states of infrastructure resources (whether basic resource objects or groupings or composite objects involving higher-level objects) helps to reduce the total set of states “adjectives” (e.g., Undeployed, Deployed, etc) and also to classify the resource management operation space. This applies to all infrastructure resource elements such as, but not limited to, servers, networks and virtualization resources.   2) Normalized set of Infrastructure Resources: Normalizing the infrastructure resource space into a few basic types (e.g., resource, group, fabric etc) helps reduce the total number of “nouns” involved which in effect helps normalize the infrastructure management operations. In addition, resource objects may be defined as atomic objects, i.e. indivisible (e.g. disk drive, storage volume, virtual machine, adaptor), or object-composition, i.e. a composite object (e.g. BladeCenter chassis comprising multiple modules, chassis, blades, PSU, etc.). Throughout the remainder of the Specification, an object-composition is termed as a composite object to avoid confusion with an operational composition.   3) Normalized with Strong Typing of the Set of infrastructure operations: All infrastructure management operations need to be strongly typed—that is, their operation schema needs to be very well-defined (e.g., inputs, outputs, error semantics). The operations need to be normalized via reduction of the total number of “verbs” in the vocabulary as well as normalizing the signature of the operation itself. Each operation is typically either a unary (single input) or binary operation (dual input), although occasionally more inputs may be employed. Typically, the same rules that apply to binary inputs apply to operations with three or more inputs. For the sake of simplicity, throughout the remainder of the Specification, examples and descriptions involve unary and binary operations.   4) Composition of normalized operations: “Composable” operations are now well-defined normalized operations that fit one common operational schema. A composition of these operations can then be applied in sequence such that the unary (or binary) input(s) to the N th  operation is (are) the output of the N−1 st  operation (and the output of the N−2 th  operation) and the output of the N th  operation in turn becomes an input of the N+1 st  operation. The only constraint is that the input and output types must match, i.e. a “strong typing” requirement. The workflow operations defined earlier are all by definition composable operations. A sequence of such operations with input and output relationships between operations as described above is defined as an ordered composition of operations. The ordering is derived from the particular sequence in which the operations are applied (example: N+1 st  operation, Nth operation, N−1 st  operation). An ordered composition of operations may be a partial order if binary operations are involved or a fully ordered composition if only unary operations are involved. For example, in the case of binary operations, there may not be an order specified between evaluation of left and right inputs. The term “partial” order is used to represent the more general binary input case.   5) Calculus of normalized operations: Together, the set of all normalized operations and the rules for composition of such operations are referred to as the calculus of resource and infrastructure operations.   6) Workflow as a composition of operations: A resource and infrastructure operational workflow, or a plan, is a named partial order composition of it set, or library, of named operations drawn from a larger set of pre-defined resource or infrastructure management operations.   7) Well-defined runtime semantics for the workflow: The workflow runtime semantics is defined via a workflow plan “semantics” object that is passed as an additional argument to the workflow plan. In general, the workflow plan semantics are defined to support typical desired semantics such as, but not limited to, below:
           Atomicity semantics: This is supported only if for every control operation there is a matching rollback operation that is defined.   Error handling semantics: This is useful to suggest whether to return on first critical error or continue even if an error is encountered.   Ordering semantics: In a partial order workflow plan, an ordering may be specified for the sub-compositions of the plan that may be otherwise run asynchronously.   Priority semantics: In a work-flow plan, a priority may be attached for the particular sub-composition of the workflow plan. For instance, a particular sub-composition may be attached high priority in which case all resources may be provided to the high priority sub-composition.   Temporal/Automation semantics: This is used to suggest perhaps how much time to wait before the plan starts to be executed or how much time to wait between any two partial orders before declaring a problem and so on.   
               

       FIG. 2  is a block diagram of RIOS  116 , first introduced in  FIG. 1 , in more detail. RIOS  116  includes three (3) types of input/output (I/O) ports, i.e. an application programming interface (API)  139 , a user interface (UI)  140  and a command line interface (CLI)  141 . Those with skill in the relevant arts will recognize the different interfaces  139 - 141  as well other suitable types of interfaces. I/O ports  139 - 141  handle communication ROS  116  has with other components of management server  102  ( FIG. 1 ) and system  100  ( FIG. 1 ). 
     RIOS  116  also includes an orchestration engine  142  that stores executable logic for the implementation of aspects of the claimed subject matter including the definition of workflows. A Resource Operation Execution Logic (ROEL)  143  stores executable logic that implements a defined workflow. A runtime  144  stores executable logic for the implementation of aspects of RIOS  116  not handled by orchestration engine  142  and ROEL  143 . 
     A management database  145  is a computer-readable storage medium that stores workflow templates  146 , infrastructure objects  147  and modeled infrastructure objects  148 . Workflow templates  146 , Infrastructure object  147  and infrastructure objects  148  may store parameters such as, but not limited to, definitions of runtime semantics and definitions of normalized resources, resource states and operations. Such definitions may be composed into libraries that are extendable by the addition of additional definitions of runtime semantics and definitions of normalized resources, resource states and operations. Infrastructure objects  157  represents potential resources that may be discovered by discovery execution logic  149  at remote locations such as over the Internet. Functionality associated with components  139 - 149  and  157  are explained in more detail below in conjunction with  FIGS. 3-14 . 
       FIG. 3  is a block diagram of three (3) normalized infrastructure resource states employed by the claimed subject matter. Normalizing states of infrastructure resources (whether basic resource objects or groupings or composite objects involving higher-level objects) reduces the total set of states “adjectives” (e.g., Undeployed, Deployed, Activated, etc) and also facilitates classification of an infrastructure management operation space. 
     The three states include a Static Object Universe  1  (SOU_ 1 )  150 , a Static Infrastructure Universe  1  (SIU_ 1 )  160 , and a Dynamic Infrastructure Universe  1  (DIU_ 1 )  170 . Static Object Universe (SOU_ 1 )  150  is the universe of undeployed manageable resource and system objects known to a particular embodiment of the claimed subject matter. SOU_ 1   150  illustrates objects  151 - 155  in an “undeployed” state, i.e. with no defined relationships. Objects in this universe are static and in a restful state. Static Infrastructure Universe (SIU 13    1 )  160  is the universe of all Deployed (connected) resources and composite resources known to a particular embodiment of the claimed subject matter. In this universe, the relationships and connections between resources are explicit. In this example, SIU_ 1   160  illustrates objects  151 - 155  in a “deployed” state and some relationships  158  among objects  151 - 155 . In general, objects and the corresponding relationships define an “infrastructure” such as SIU_ 1   160 . However, infrastructure resources in this universe are still static and not performing any useful function, Dynamic Infrastructure Universe (DIU_ 1 )  170  is the universe of Activated infrastructure resources that are deployed to perform some useful function in an interconnected way and known to a running computer program embodiment of this invention. DIU_ 1   170  illustrates objects  171 - 175  in an “activated” state with some relationships  178 . Because DIU_ 1   170  defines both objects and relationships. DIU_ 1   170  represents a dynamic infrastructure. 
     A core set of infrastructure resources may be broadly classified into physical resources (see  120 ,  FIG. 1 ) (e.g. systems or platforms disk drives, etc.), logical resources (see  130 ,  FIG. 1 ) (e.g. virtual machines, storage volumes, virtual disks, ports, etc.), groups (e.g., disk drive arrays, server system pools, multi-pathing group, etc.), and fabrics (e.g., VLANs, FC SAN, etc). The rest of the types are composite objects on these basic resource types and in turn represent higher-order resources, groups and/or fabrics. In this example, infrastructure resource states are reduced to the 3 key states: Undeployed, Deployed, and Activated. Undeployed implies—not usable or exploitable. Deployed implies usable or exploitable. Activated implies being-used or exploited at any point in time. For example, a server in a reserve pool is undeployed, a storage volume attached to as server is deployed, and a virtual memory (VM) that has been started up is in activated state. In some cases, the move from deployed to activated may be a no-operation, or “nop,” but this normalized view across all resources facilitates the definition of an operational workflow. In addition, resources may have other states and status in which an administrator is interested; they maybe handled as before and are not critical to the operational workflow model. 
     Infrastructure management operations are strongly typed in that they have well-defined Inputs, Outputs and Operation Semantics. Inputs are well-defined resource or group or fabric types. Some examples include, but are not limited to:
         Unary Operations: These are workflow operations that take a single input (Target);   Binary Operations: These are workflow operations that take two inputs (Source &amp; Target;   Inputs: These are well-defined resource, group or fabric type objects;   Output: Output is a well-defined resource, group or fabric type object;   Operation semantics: The operation has to have a semantics object that carries the initial profile or best practice pattern for the object and/or the semantics of the operation itself including any best practice pattern that may apply.       

     Operations are strongly typed as follows. One embodiment of the signatures for the operations in this calculus are described below using a procedural programming language flavor such as C, C++ or JAVA. Unary operations of the calculus have the following signature:
         ReturnedObject OperationPerformedOnSource (SemanticsObject, TargetObject, RuntimeContextObject);
 
and all binary operations of the calculus have the following signature:
   ReturnedObject OperationPerformedOnSource (SemanticsObject, SourceObject, TargetObject, RuntimeContextObject);   where SemanticsObject defines the profile, best practice, or policy applied on the object or the operation. Supporting operations are provided to generate this object from object profiles, policies, and best practices.   SourceObject is the Object which is the target for source for binary operations.   TargetObject is the target object for both unary and binary operations.   RunTimeContextObject is the object that carries the RuntimeContext for the operation and it carries error, async/sync semantics, locking/unlocking semantics, transaction IDs if any and is passed from operation to operation and   ReturnedObject is the output that is the end result of the operation. For example, with respect to a Create operation, the created object is the ReturnedObject; with respect to as Move operation, the moved object in its moved state or location is the ReturnedObject.
 
Ternary operations, if applicable in the calculus, has as Source, Target and an Intermediate or Staging object as inputs.
       

     The exact implementation of the application programming interface above depends on the implementation. In general, regardless of whether an object is carried around as a reference type and returned as a reference type is up to the implementation. Implementations may vary depending on the language used for implementation. Other embodiments are possible within procedural languages, functional languages (such as Scheme), or logical calculus languages (which are beyond the scope of this invention). With the resource state, typing, and infrastructure management operations being normalized, the calculus comprises an enumerated normalized set of operations (otherwise termed as a library of operations). In general, a core subset of the enumerated set is expected to apply to all resources, groups, and fabrics. For example, Create, Delete, Deploy, Undeploy, Activate, and De-activate are expected to be applicable to all logical resources regardless of whether they are server, storage, or network resources. It is possible for as subset of the calculus to be applicable to only a subset of the resources. For example, Backup and Archive may apply only to storage resource objects. The calculus of operations is not a static and fixed set—additional operations discovered subsequently can be added to the set as long as it follows the constraints posed by this model. 
       FIG. 4  is a block diagram illustrating Basic Control with respect to SOU_ 1   150  ( FIG. 3 ). Like  FIG. 3 ,  FIG. 4  includes objects  161 - 165 . In addition,  FIG. 4  illustrates several management operations that may be taken with respect to objects such as objects  161 - 165 , including a Create  182 , a Delete  183 , a Get  184 , a Set  185 , a Copy, or “Clone,”  186 , an Update  187  and a Transform  188 . Operations  182 - 188  are typically used for the life-cycle of static resource objects and most operations continue to keep the resource in static state, i.e. typically performed on Undeployed objects with the exception for the Deploy operation that takes a resource object from an Undeployed state to a Deployed state. 
     Create  182  creates a static database object and possibly a memory object that represents a manageable and provisionable resource using the attributes, defined ports/objects and constraints presented in a best practices template for the resource object. Create  182  is generally used for static creation of a logical resource object. For example, a cluster is a composite resource object that may be statically created. See “Reform” which is a dynamic re-formation of a cluster and applies only to clusters. There may be other “add,” “create,” “discover,” “delete” or “remove” operations where end-point instances or group instances are added or created within the database or runtime. These operations do not have any defined input end-point or group. Any end-point/group specification is performed as part of the constraints for the operation (see below). The output of these operations is an end-point or a group. 
     Delete  183  deletes an in-memory and/or database object. Delete  183  takes an end-point or group as input and return NULL as output. With respect to Get  184 , filter criteria may be specified in a SemanticsObject and if the filter when applied turns out to be TRUE, then for resources, platforms, fabrics or groups the corresponding objects are returned. Set  185  performs configuration, state-changing, etc operations on the object. Copy  186  typically applies to logical resources and causes a clone with a new object ID to be created. In this example, object  161  has been copied to create a new object  191 . 
     Update  187  is a typically a nop for all but for physical Platform objects (also typically termed as systems or devices). If an object represents an updatable software or hardware platform that requires a systems software or firmware update, then Update  187  is applicable. Transform  188  is typically used to transform the type of an object. In this example, object  191  has been transformed to a new object  192 . 
       FIG. 5  is block diagram illustrating Deployment and Activation Control that may be employed with respect to SOU_ 1   150 , SIO_ 1   160 , and DIU_ 1   170  of  FIG. 3 . Deployment and activation control operations are typically used to put infrastructure resources to use for exploitation or to pull out of exploitation.  FIG. 5  illustrates key operations that change the Deployed or Activated state of the resource. Note that Copy  186  ( FIG. 4 ) is shown here only as an example for creating a static clone of a Deployed or Activated object. 
     A Deploy  193  typically refers to the deployment of an atomic or composite resource object. An Undeploy  194  typically refers to the removal of a resource object from the infrastructure. An Activate  195  typically refers to activating a resource object to become useful in the environment, if applicable, otherwise Activate  195  serves as a nop. A De-activate  196  refers to de-activating a resource object, if applicable, otherwise De-activate  196  serves as a nop. 
       FIG. 6  is a block diagram illustrating Mobility Control that may be employed with respect to different universes such as SOU_ 1   150 , SIO_ 1   160  and DIU_ 1   170  of  FIG. 3 . These operations are used to move or migrate resources in the infrastructure (e.g., VM mobility, storage migration). The nature of the move may be local or remote depending on the kind of object and the kind of network fabric underneath. The diagram depicts a Move  206  in which an object in SOU_ 1   150  is moved to another static object universe  2  (SOU_ 2 )  202 . The diagram also depicts a Move  208  in which an object in DIU_ 1   160  is moved to another dynamic infrastructure universe  2  (DIU 13    2 )  204 . VM mobility is a dynamic example whereas storage migration of a static storage volume object is a static example. It should be noted that Mobility Control does not typically apply to physical resources such as server systems, disk drives, etc. 
       FIG. 7  is a block diagram of illustrating Group and Composite-Object Control that may be employed with respect to different universes such as a Universe_ 1   212  and a Universe_ 2   214 . These operations apply to groups of resources or higher-order composite objects. When the object is a group, a “member” represents a member of the group. When the object is a “composite object” then that “member” represents a sub-component of the composite object (e.g., blade is a member of a chassis). Examples of operations include, but are not limited to an Add Member  216 , a Drop Member  218 , a Get Member  220 , a Set Member  222  and a Transfer  224 . 
     Add Member  216  adds an object or a sub-component to a group or composite object. For a composite object, the semantics may provide additional constraints on where to add the member. Drop Member  218 , drops, or removes, a member from a group or composite object. Get Member  220  applies filter criteria in the SemanticsObject and if the filter when applied turns out to be TRUE, then if a singular object satisfies the filter the member object is returned else NULL or NULL-GROUP is returned. NULL-GROUP implies more than one object was returned. Set Member  222  involves, if applicable, modifying the state of a particular member that matches a filter (e.g., an identifier) in the group or composite object. A Transfer  224  moves an object from one universe to another. In this example, Transfer  224  is illustrated moving both a dynamic object  226  and a deployed object  228  between Universe_ 1   212  and Universe_ 2   214 . 
     In addition there may be a GetSubGroup (not shown) that applies to sub-groupings or sub-composite objects within composite objects, respectively. Those member objects that result in a filter being TRUE are returned as a group of the same type as the original group (If the original object was a heterogeneous group and the filter retained only homogeneous objects, the returned group is still a heterogeneous group of the same type as the original group. There may also be a SetSubGroup (not shown) used to set the states of all members in the group that satisfy a filter criteria. A FormGroup (not shown) is used when a grouping or composite object supports a dynamic ability to “form” the group (example: clusters supports dynamic reformation of the group). A BreakGroup (not shown) is used to decompose the group object, e.g. to: break a cluster apart. 
       FIG. 8  is a block diagram illustrating Availability Control that may be employed with respect to different universes such as DIU_ 1   170  ( FIGS. 3 ,  5  and  6 ) and DIU_ 2   204  ( FIG. 6 ). Availability control is provided with two (2) value-added functions for which implementation is optional but at a minimum stubs are recommended. Provided is a Failover  230 , which is employed to failover a basic resource object or a composite-object from one location (or universe) onto another location (or Universe), typically in a Disaster Recovery scenario (not shown) and/or a Failback  232 . 
       FIG. 9  is a block diagram illustrating Durability Control that may be employed with respect to different universes such as SOU_ 1   150  ( FIGS. 3-6 ) and SOU_ 2   204  ( FIG. 6 ). In this example, SOU_ 2   204  is the backup or archive storage location for resources. Functions that provide the disclosed actions include a Backup  234 , which typically performs a backup of a storage resource in a specific location; a Restore  236 , which typically performs a restore of a storage resource from its backup; an Archive  238 , which typically performs an archive of a storage resource at a specified secondary storage location; and an Unarchive  240 , which typically returns the object from its archived state back to primary storage. These operations are typically used to enhance the long-term durability of data or storage objects. 
       FIG. 10  is a block diagram illustrating a composition of normalized infrastructure operations that may be employed with respect to the disclosed technology. Included is an operational workflow  250 . A composition of normalized infrastructure operations such as operational workflow  250  may be applied in a sequence such that the input to the N th  operation is the output of the N−1 th  operation and the output of the N th  operation in turn becomes the input of the N+1 th  operation. One constraint is that input and output types match. Workflow operation  250  defined is by definition a composable operation. The ordering is derived from the particular sequence in which the operations are applied. For example, in  FIG. 10 , a Target End-Point (EP)  5 . 0  operation  252  and an Optional Target End-Point  5 . 1  (OTE)  254  are executed and the corresponding outputs become inputs to an Operation (Op.)  4 . 0   258 . The notations such as notation “. . . ”  256  following elements of operation workflow  250  indicate that there may be one (1) or more additional, similar elements corresponding to each element. 
     In a similar fashion, outputs corresponding to Operation  4 . 0   258  and an Optional Operation  4 . 1   260  provide inputs to an Operation  3 . 0   262 ; outputs corresponding to Operation  3 . 0   262  and an Optional Operation  3 . 1   264  provide inputs to an Operation  2 . 0   266 ; and outputs corresponding to Operation  3 . 0   2628  and an Optional Operation  3 . 1   264  provide inputs to an Operation  2 . 0   266 . Finally, outputs corresponding to Operation  2 . 0   266  and an Optional Operation  2 . 1   268  provide inputs to a Root Operation  1 . 0   270 . A sequence of named workflow operations such as workflow  250  and additional operational workflows (not shown) may be applied with the inputs and outputs of the operations as defined above in what is referred to an ordered composition. 
       FIG. 11  is a block diagram illustrating one example of a workflow, i.e. an operational workflow  280 , employed according to the disclosed technology to create a redundant array of independent disks (RAID) resource object. In this example, a Get Drives operation  282  picks available storage drives from a storage container  284 . A Root operation  1 . 0   286  then combines the picked storage drives into a configuration selected from possible configurations detailed in a storage containers  288 . For example, a number of disk drives may be combined to create a RAID 1 or a RAID 5 array. The semantics object may be different for each object type, i.e. RAID 1 and RAID 5, and so for each operation such as root operation  1 . 0   286  in a workflow such as workflow  289  an appropriate semantics object is created. However, runtime semantics for a workflow is captured in specific runtime semantics objects. 
     Examples of operations for best practice and operational semantics include:
         CreateSemanticsObj ( )—This creates a semantics object based on the profiles or best practices or policies for an object or the operation in question.   DeleteSemanticsObj ( )—This deletes a semantics object (if persistent).   GetSemanticsObj ( )—This can retrieve semantics objects for an object type or operation.   SetSemanticsObj ( )—This can modify a semantics object.       

       FIG. 12  is a block diagram of Error Semantics in conjunction with operation workflow  259  ( FIG. 10 ). Like  FIG. 10 ,  FIG. 12  includes target end  252 , OTE  254 , operations  258 ,  260 ,  262 ,  264 ,  266 ,  268  and  270 . Also illustrated are Null with Error  302 , which is transmitted from target End  5 . 0   252  to op.  4 . 0   258  upon detection of an exception during processing. In a similar fashion under similar circumstances, a Null with Error  304  is transmitted from Op.  4 . 0   258  to OP.  3 . 0   262 , a Null with Error  306  is transmitted from Op.  3 . 0   262  to OP.  2 . 0   266 , a Null with Error  308  is transmitted from Op.  2 . 0   266  to Root OP.  1 . 0   270 . In addition, a Null with Error  310  is transmitted form Root Op.  270  is a process that initiated operation workflow  250 . In this manner, an exception generated anywhere in the tree represented by operation workflow  250  is ultimately transmitted to the initiating process. 
     Examples of operations that may support validation with respect to error semantics include ValidateSemantics ( ) and ValidateWorkflow ( ). Operations that support blocking semantics include:
         Lock ( )—This enables locking of an object (either in the database or in a lock implemented in an appropriate resource domain). READER, WRITER locks are implemented.   Unlock ( )—This unlocks an object.   UpgradeLock—This upgrades a lock (e.g., READER to WRITER).   DowngradeLock( )—This downgrades a lock.       

       FIG. 13  is a flow chart of a Setup Operation Workflow process  350  that may implement aspects the claimed subject matter. In this example, logic associated with process  350  may be stored in executable logic (see  142 - 149 ,  FIG. 2 ) as part of RIOS  116  ( FIGS. 1 and 2 ) and executed on CPU, or processor,  104  ( FIG. 1 ) of management server  102  ( FIG. 1 ). 
     Process  350  starts in a “Begin Setup RIOS” block  352  and proceeds immediately to a “Normalize States” block  354 . During processing associated with block  354 , a user or administrator defines a set of normalized infrastructure resource states (see  FIG. 3 ). As explained above in conjunction with  FIG. 1 , normalizing the states of infrastructure resources (whether basic resource objects or groupings or composite objects involving higher-level objects) helps to reduce the total set of states “adjectives” (e.g., Undeployed, Deployed, etc) and also to classify the resource management operation space. This applies to all infrastructure resource elements such as, but not limited to, servers, networks and virtualization resources. 
     During a “Normalize Resources” block  356 , a user or administrator of RIOS  116  classifies the resources in resource and infrastructure management architecture  100  ( FIG. 1 ) according to the normalized infrastructure resource states defined during processing associated with block  354 . As explained above, normalizing the infrastructure resource space into a few basic types (e.g., resource, group, fabric etc) helps reduce the total number of “nouns” involved which in effect helps normalize the infrastructure management operations. In addition, resource objects may be defined as atomic objects, i.e. indivisible (e.g. disk drive, storage volume, virtual machine, adaptor), or composite objects (e.g. BladeCenter chassis comprising multiple modules, chassis, blades, PSU, etc.). 
     During processing associated with a “Normalize operations” block  358  a user or administrator defines operations that may be executed with respect to the normalized set of resources generated during processing associated with block  356 . As explained above, infrastructure management operations need to be strongly typed—that is, their operation schema needs to be very well-defined (e.g., inputs, outputs, error semantics). The operations need to be normalized via reduction of the total number of “verbs” in the vocabulary as well as normalizing the signature of the operation itself. Each operation is typically either a unary (single input) or binary operation (dual input), although occasionally more inputs may be employed. Typically, the same rules that apply to binary inputs apply to operations with three or more inputs. 
     During a “Store Normalized States, Resources and Operations” block  360 , the information generated during processing associated with blocks  354 ,  356  and  358  is stored in management DB  145  for use during execution of RIOS  116  (see process  370 ,  FIG. 14 ). It should be understood information generated and stored during processing associated with process  350  may be updated, augmented, extended, etc. based upon, but not limited to, such conditions as new information regarding architecture  100  or best practices that emerge during execution of RIOS  16 . Finally, control proceeds to an “End Setup RIOS” block  369  in which process  350  is complete. 
       FIG. 14  is a flow chart of an Implement Operation Workflow process  370  that may implement aspects the claimed subject matter. In this example, logic associated with process  370  is stored in executable logic (see  142 - 149 ,  FIG. 2 ) as part of RIOS  116  ( FIGS. 1 and 2 ) and executed on CPU, or processor,  104  ( FIG. 1 ) of management server  102  ( FIG. 1 ). 
     Processing associated with process  370  starts in a “Begin Implement Workflow” block  372  and proceeds immediately to a “Retrieve Normalized States, Resources and Operations” block  374 . During processing associated with block  374 , data defining normalized states (see  354 ,  FIG. 13 ), resources (see  356 ,  FIG. 13 ) and operations (see  358 ,  FIG. 13 ) are retrieved from DB  146  ( FIG. 2 ). During processing associated with a “Compose Operation” block  376 , an administrator defines a particular operation in terms of states, resources and operations retrieved during processing associated with block  374 . During processing associated with an “Add Operation to Sequence” block  378 , the operation composed during block  376  is inserted in a workflow, such as workflow  250  ( FIGS. 10 and 12 ). 
     During processing associated with a “More Operations?” block  380 , the administrator determines whether or not the workflow being assembled is complete. If not, control returns to Compose Operation block  376  and processing continues as describe above with the administrator composing any additional operations. If a determination is made that the workflow being assembled is complete, control proceeds to a “Generate Workflow” block  282  (see  FIGS. 10-12 ). During block  282  the workflow is indicated as ready for execution and during processing associated with an “Execute Workflow” block  384  the workflow composed and assembled during processing associated with blocks  374 ,  376 ,  378 ,  380  and  382  is executed. 
     It should be noted that there is no requirement that a defined workflow generated in accordance with the disclosed technology be executed immediately once the composition and assembly is complete. Rather, the defined workflow may be stored in a CRSM and executed at multiple times in the future. In addition a defined workflow may be incorporated modified or incorporated into another workflow. Finally, process  370  processed to an “End Implement Workflow” block  389  during which process  370  is complete. 
     The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. 
     The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended, to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. 
     The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.