Abstract:
An exemplary method for handling a hidden dialog in a media centered graphical user environment is presented including: detecting the hidden dialog; determining whether the hidden dialog is an approved dialog; if the hidden dialog is an approved dialog, providing a notification to a user of the hidden dialog such that the media centered graphical user environment is interrupted; and if the hidden dialog is not an approved dialog, ignoring the hidden dialog such that the media centered graphical user environment is uninterrupted. In some embodiments, the hidden dialog originates from any WINDOWS™ compatible program. In some embodiments, the hidden dialog is a pop-up notification. In some embodiments, the approved dialog is user configurable. In some embodiments, the approved dialog may be: a programmatic subscription dialog, a programmatic update dialog, a programmatic alert dialog, and a system alert dialog.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]     The present invention is related to the following applications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference:  
         [0002]     Commonly assigned application entitled “GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR MANAGING NATIVE DISPLAY RESOLUTION FROM A DISTANCE,” filed on even date herewith by the same inventors herein (Attorney Docket Number 200407493-1).  
       BACKGROUND  
       [0003]     Media display systems have become increasingly sophisticated as technology advances have made more media streams available to users. From over the air broadcasts to Internet streaming video, media display systems are now enabled to manage and process a variety of complex media streams. Indeed, in some prior art solutions, a dedicated media centered graphical user environment managed by a computing system may be utilized to display various types of media streams. A dedicated media centered graphical user environment is an environment that provides a graphical user interface dedicated to managing media streams thus greatly simplifying user interaction while viewing media content. As a practical matter, however, simplifying user interaction (by limiting computer functionality) in a dedicated media centered graphical user environment can pose undesired limitations.  
         [0004]     For example,  FIG. 1  is an illustrative flowchart of a prior art method of receiving a hidden dialog. In a standard computing system, dialogs may be utilized to inform a user of various programmatic and system conditions. For example, a virus program subscription notification may be displayed to remind a user to update a subscription. In media centered graphical user environments, however, a user may be shielded from dialogs as a result of inherent limited functionality of the environment. As such, dialogs may remain hidden from a user unless specific action is taken to view those hidden dialogs. Thus at a first step  104 , in prior art systems, a hidden dialog is received. As noted above, a hidden dialog is a dialog that, in a media centered graphical user environment is not displayed to a user as in at a step  106 . The method then determines whether the computing system is shutdown or logged off at a step  108 . If the computing system is shutdown or logged off at a step  108 , the user misses the hidden dialog at a step  116 . That is, where a media centered graphical user environment is being utilized, the computing system may simply shutdown or log off directly from the environment thus never revealing the hidden dialog. The method then ends.  
         [0005]     If the computing system is not shutdown or logged off at a step  108 , a user may minimize or exit the media centered graphical user environment at a step  110 . At this point, outside of the media centered graphical user environment, the hidden dialog may be seen at a step  112 . A user may then choose to ignore, or react to the hidden dialog in accordance with user preferences. At a next step  114 , the user may return to the media centered graphical user environment to continue viewing media. The method then ends.  
         [0006]     As can be appreciated, hidden dialogs may contain system critical information for a user. Thus, it may be advantageous to mitigate occurrences of hidden dialogs in media centered graphical user environments so that a user may address computing system issues without unduly interfering with a user&#39;s viewing experience. Therefore, methods and systems for handling hidden dialogs in a media centered graphical user environment are presented herein.  
       SUMMARY  
       [0007]     The invention provides methods and systems for handling hidden dialogs in a media centered graphical user environment that may be utilized in a variety of computing systems thereby enhancing user operability.  
         [0008]     An exemplary method for handling a hidden dialog in a media centered graphical user environment is presented including: detecting the hidden dialog; determining whether the hidden dialog is an approved dialog; if the hidden dialog is an approved dialog, providing a notification to a user of the hidden dialog such that the media centered graphical user environment is interrupted; and if the hidden dialog is not an approved dialog, ignoring the hidden dialog such that the media centered graphical user environment is uninterrupted. In some embodiments, the hidden dialog originates from any WINDOWS™ compatible program. In some embodiments, the hidden dialog is a pop-up notification. In some embodiments, the approved dialog is user configurable. In some embodiments, the approved dialog may be: a programmatic subscription dialog, a programmatic update dialog, a programmatic alert dialog, and a system alert dialog. In some embodiments, the notification may be a visual alert, an audio alert, and an audio visual alert 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0009]     The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:  
         [0010]      FIG. 1  is an illustrative flowchart of a prior art method of receiving a hidden dialog;  
         [0011]      FIG. 2  is an illustrative representation of a method of handling a hidden dialog in accordance with embodiments of the present invention; and  
         [0012]      FIG. 3  is an illustrative diagram of a system for managing a hidden dialog in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0013]     The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to a few embodiments thereof as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process steps and/or structures have not been described in detail in order to not unnecessarily obscure the present invention.  
         [0014]     Various embodiments are described hereinbelow, including methods and techniques. It should be kept in mind that the invention might also cover articles of manufacture that includes a computer readable medium on which computer-readable instructions for carrying out embodiments of the inventive technique are stored. The computer readable medium may include, for example, semiconductor, magnetic, opto-magnetic, optical, or other forms of computer readable medium for storing computer readable code. Further, the invention may also cover apparatuses for practicing embodiments of the invention. Such apparatus may include circuits, dedicated and/or programmable, to carry out tasks pertaining to embodiments of the invention. Examples of such apparatus include a general-purpose computer and/or a dedicated computing device when appropriately programmed and may include a combination of a computer/computing device and dedicated/programmable circuits adapted for the various tasks pertaining to embodiments of the invention.  
         [0015]      FIG. 2  is an illustrative representation of a method of handling a hidden dialog in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In particular, the method illustrated allows for handling of a hidden dialog in a media centered graphical user environment. In some embodiments, the media centered graphical user environment is a WINDOWS™ Media Center environment. At a first step  204 , a hidden dialog is received. As noted above, in prior art solutions, dialogs received in a media centered graphical user environment may be hidden from a user in order to simplify and enhance a user&#39;s viewing experience. Thus, at a step  206 , the hidden dialog is not visible over a media centered graphical user environment. The method then detects the hidden dialog at a step  208 . Detecting a hidden dialog may be accomplished by any manner well-known in the art. In some embodiments, a hidden dialog may be a pop-up notification as is commonly utilized in Internet browser applications.  
         [0016]     The method then determines whether the hidden dialog is an approved dialog at a step  210 . An approved dialog is a dialog that has been configured by a user so that the method informs the user of its presence. Thus, for example, a user may configure a virus subscription notification dialog as an approved dialog. In this example, a virus subscription notification dialog may be detected at a step  210  while in the media centered graphical user environment. As may be appreciated, approved dialogs may include any number of dialogs such as, a programmatic subscription dialog, a programmatic update dialog, a programmatic alert dialog, and a system alert dialog. Furthermore, dialogs may, in some embodiments, originate from any WINDOWS™ compatible program.  
         [0017]     If the method determines that a hidden dialog is an approved dialog at a step  210 , the method continues to notify the user of the hidden dialog at a step  212 . Notification may be accomplished in any number of manners including by a visual alert (graphic), an audio alert (sound), or an audio visual alert (sound and graphic). In some embodiments, a visual alert may also include a text message. In other embodiments, notification may be configured to completely interrupt a media centered graphical user environment (i.e. to exit or minimize the media centered graphical user environment) or to partially interrupt a media centered graphical user environment (i.e. display a graphic or play a sound over the media centered graphical user environment).  
         [0018]     If the method determines that a hidden dialog is not an approved dialog at a step  210 , the method continues to log the hidden dialog at a step  214 . As can be appreciated, some dialogs that may be displayed are not critical to system maintenance or security. In those instances, a user may desire to be insulated from continual interruption. However, a user may yet desire to track all received dialogs to be addressed in turn at a later, more convenient time. Thus, at a step  214 , unapproved hidden dialog may be logged such that the unapproved hidden dialogs are at least immediately ignored by a user. At a next step  216 , the method may provide notification to a user that unapproved hidden dialogs have been logged when the user exits the media centered graphical user environment. As can be appreciated, exiting the media centered graphical user environment may include minimizing the media centered graphical user environment, closing the media centered graphical user environment, logging off of the computing system, or shutting down the computing system. In this manner, a user may be assured of properly tracking received dialogs after leaving a media centered graphical user environment.  
         [0019]     As can be appreciated, the method described above takes place within a media centered graphical user environment. Thus, a user may fully enjoy the simplified functionality of a media centered graphical user environment without sacrificing notification of important dialogs relating to computing system operations.  
         [0020]      FIG. 3  is an illustrative diagram of a system  300  for managing a hidden dialog in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. As illustrated, system  300  includes a computing system  304  electronically coupled with a display  308  for displaying media. As can be appreciated, computing system  304  may be utilized to control any number of media streams including, for example, computer system media, digital media, analog media, cable media, satellite media, Internet media, and broadcast media. As noted above many different types of media streams may be available in modern systems. Thus, the use of a computing system to manage media streams may offer distinct advantages over component systems. Computing system  304  may include an operating system  312 . As can be appreciated, an operating system may be configured to utilize a media centered graphical user environment. That is, when the operating system is booted, it may be configured to immediately invoke a media centered graphical user environment for a user. In some embodiments, the operating system may be configured as a WINDOWS™ XP operating system. In other embodiments, the media centered graphical user environment is a WINDOWS™ Media Center environment.  
         [0021]     Computing system  304  further includes a dialog detection module  316  for detecting hidden dialogs. As noted above, hidden dialogs are dialogs that are hidden in some embodiments utilizing a media centered graphical user environment. Hidden dialogs may be invoked in response to an operating system operation which may, in turn, be responsive to a programmatic command. The dialog detection module  316  may be configured with a user configurable approved dialog list or table. As noted above, a user may configure a dialog such that methods described herein may notify a user of receiving the configured dialog. Thus, dialog detection module  316  may further include a configuration component for populating the user configurable approved dialog list or table with approved dialogs. In this manner, approved dialogs may be added or deleted from the user configurable approved dialog list or table in accordance with user preferences. Finally, dialog detection module  316  may further include a comparison component for comparing a received hidden dialog against the user configurable approved dialog list. Comparing as described herein is well-known in the art and may be accomplished in any suitable manner.  
         [0022]     Computing system  304  further includes a dialog notification module  320  for interrupting the media centered graphical user environment such that a notification is made to the user when a hidden dialog is an approved dialog. As noted above, notification may be accomplished in any number of manners including by a visual alert (graphic), an audio alert (sound), or an audio visual alert (sound and graphic). In some embodiments, a visual alert may also include a text message. In other embodiments, notification may be configured to completely interrupt a media centered graphical user environment (i.e. to exit or minimize the media centered graphical user environment) or to partially interrupt a media centered graphical user environment (i.e. display a graphic or play a sound).  
         [0023]     Finally, computing system  304  further includes a dialog logging module  324  for logging a hidden dialog if the hidden dialog is not an approved dialog. In some embodiments, dialog logging module  324  may be further configured to notify a user of logged hidden dialogs on exit from a media centered graphical user environment. As noted above, notification may be accomplished in any number of manners including by a visual alert (graphic), an audio alert (sound), or an audio visual alert (sound and graphic). In some embodiments, a visual alert may also include a text message.  
         [0024]     While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, there are alterations, permutations, and equivalents, which fall within the scope of this invention. It should also be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the methods and apparatuses of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims be interpreted as including all such alterations, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.