Abstract:
This invention describes a method, an apparatus, and a system for optimizing antenna performance by remotely adjusting the plumb-to-level (absolute measurements with respect to true vertical) and the compass heading (absolute compass heading direction with respect to magnetic North) of one or a plurality of communication antennas by electromechanical means. Until now, only fixed, manual adjustments referenced to points on the tower that are assumed to be accurate, but are not, can be made. Furthermore, antenna optimization that is accomplished by solely adjusting the tilt of an antenna is limited. And, since azimuth adjustments for antenna sectors are difficult to adjust manually and are not available by electromechanical means, site planning personnel have not been able to accurately compensate for changes in tower and site parameters. Also, since site surveys provide plumb-to-level and compass heading information, this invention allows remote adjustments of site parameters with absolute reference to survey data. Furthermore the invention allows antennas within a sector having antennas with capacity to spare to be swept into a sector experiencing higher traffic loads.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
   None 
   STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED R &amp; D 
   None 
   REFERENCE TO A “MICROFICHE APPENDIX” 
   None 
   BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   1. Field of the Invention 
   This invention describes a method, an apparatus, and a system for remotely adjusting by mechanical and electronic means the plumb-to-level and the compass heading of one or a plurality of communication antennas. The term plumb-to-level will be used throughout this description to represent absolute measurements with respect to true vertical. And, the term compass heading will be used throughout this description to represent absolute compass heading direction with respect to magnetic North. 
   A continuing problem for cellular telephone network planners is that of base station over or under coverage. That is, if the overlapping area between two cells is too large (i.e., over coverage), increased switching between the base station (handoff) occurs, which strains the system. Likewise, if the overlapping area between two cells is too small (i.e., under coverage), gaps in service, or nodes, will occur. There may even be interference with other cellular networks using the same, or nearby, operating frequencies. To minimize the over and under coverage effects, a cost effective means to precisely position the antenna remains a continuing challenge. 
   This invention is not limited to antennas for cellular telephone network use only, but since this is the largest use, we will use this application in the following description. In general, radio frequency antennas are described as having a radiation pattern that is referred to as being a horizontal pattern and a vertical pattern, with the former being referenced along the horizon, as would a compass heading, and the latter being referenced from the vertical, as would plumb-to-level. Since cellular telephone traffic tends to concentrate in certain areas such as along a busy highway, further performance optimization is accomplished by the ability to precisely position the antenna in a concentrated area. 
   The industry term for antenna position with respect to vertical angle is down-tilt. The term for antenna position with respect to horizontal angle is azimuth. Measurements of plumb-to-level (P-L) and compass heading (CH) are absolute and are referenced to the earth itself. Current methods for obtaining antenna settings such as down-tilt angle are measured with respect to a part of the tower itself. In the case of most radio antennas, this measurement is made with respect to the tower. However, these tower referenced measurements are subject to many induced errors caused by weather, ground shifting, disturbances, or human error that is inherent to the measurement process itself. Once the reference is flawed, then all the calibrations based upon the reference are in error. 
   There are several ways to adjust antenna down-tilt. One way is to adjust it electronically by using a phased-array antenna. Another way is by mechanical means, as in using a special down-tilt mounting bracket such as the EZ-Tiltz™ bracket. The mechanical method is the simplest method since it does not require sophisticated timing and electronic phasing circuits. A third way to adjust the antenna down-tilt is to use closed loop electromechanical control devices using encoders. Because of the reference issue described above, this method is also flawed, and care must be taken to use components that are compatible with electromagnetic interference (EMI) sensitive communication electronics. The use of high frequency devices such as stepping motor drives is not recommended. 
   Unfortunately, antenna optimization that is accomplished by solely adjusting the down-tilt alone is limited. Improvements made by adjusting the down-tilt are only valid for one direction of the horizontal radiation pattern. Within the most critical range of down-tilt, the actual radiation coverage varies more according to the azimuth direction, but demonstrates that both the down-tilt and the azimuth adjustments are integral. A change results in a horizontal radiation half-power beam width which gets broader with increasing down-tilt angle rather than the desired narrower, more focused radiation beam. Since azimuth adjustments for antenna sectors (more than one antenna acting as one antenna) are difficult to adjust manually and are not available electronically, site planning personnel to date have not been able to accurately compensate for this effect. Site surveys provide P-L and CH information. Until now, only fixed, manual adjustments referenced to points on the tower are assumed to be accurate. This invention allows remote adjustments with absolute reference to survey data. 
   Cellular telephone network antenna systems found in the center of a “cell” usually consist of three sectors, positioned at 120° segments of the complete circle. Each sector usually consists of four antennas mounted on a common mounting bar. From this, it can be seen that a typical cellular telephone antenna site can have up to twelve antennas needing periodic adjustment. This is very labor intensive and expensive, and usually involves dangerous work high above the ground. 
   2. Description of Related Art 
   Singer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,239,744 B1, teaches a method for adjusting antenna down-tilt, but only from a broad-brush perspective. Singer fails to address the need for azimuth adjustments in order to optimize beam coverage of a specific location when consideration is given to traffic patterns, topography, and other networks. Further, the Singer patent is based on the use of built-in controllers for each antenna and antenna sector, remembering stored data, and utilizing local and remote displays. In Singer, sensing down-tilt position of the antenna is left to an angle decoder to determine the angle between the antenna and its mounting structure, but does not address the need to coincide site survey data and actual site conditions. Much attention is given to operational function in Singer, but little attention is given to indicate how the actual hardware, or any integrated system, may be created by following its teachings. 
   Zimmerman et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,928, Bernier, U.S. Pat. No. 5,029,179, and Chavez, U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,179, all teach manually adjusted down-tilt or azimuth antenna brackets. No mention of a remote means of adjustment is made. 
   Fulop, U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,514, teaches a satellite antenna position optimization system that is fast, complicated and expensive, suitable for government satellite tracking, but not suitable for low cost commercial installations such as that required by small cellular antenna sites. Fulop teaches a method of using GPS data to establish antenna position, which is outside the scope of this invention. 
   Hill, U.S. Pat. No. 5,461,935, teaches a slip clutch linear actuator. This design is fatally flawed because over travel of the actuator could cause the mechanism to bind. With the spring loaded clutch, actuators are limited to a fixed amount of torque. If this torque limit is exceeded, the drive reaches a point of slippage, thereby causing an irreversible jamming condition due to limited torque settings of the slip clutch. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   Objective and Advantages 
   This invention addresses the disadvantages of current equipment and techniques, and provides the industry with an economical and efficient method of making remote P-L and CH adjustments of multi-antenna sectors typically found at cellular telephone networks. 
   In a typical cellular telephone network, base station performance deteriorates quickly due to over coverage and under coverage. It is the objective of this invention to provide a method and a hardware/software system to effectively optimize cellular network antennas by remotely adjusting antenna P-L and CH to eliminate over coverage and under coverage. 
   Antenna adjustments that are referenced to the support structure such as Singer are subject to many errors caused by weather, ground shifting, or disturbances due to the measurement process itself. Once the reference is flawed, then all the measurements based on that reference become corrupted. It is the objective of this invention to provide measurements and adjustments of down-tilt and azimuth that are made with respect to absolute geodetic measurements of P-L and CH. 
   Antenna site survey data is based on absolute P-L and CH information To date, only fixed, manual adjustments of antenna down-tilt and azimuth can be made. It is the objective of this invention to provide a method for remote adjustments and measurements based on the same frame of reference. 
   Current methods of down-tilt adjustment of antennas by elaborate electronic means are limited and expensive. It is the objective of this invention to provide an electromechanical method of not only P-L adjustment, but also of CH adjustment by a simple, cost effective means that does not require sophisticated timing and electronic phasing circuits. 
   Due to the sensitive nature of communications circuits, extreme care must be taken to use components that are compatible with their electromagnetic interference (EMI) sensitive circuits. The use of devices that emit high frequency interference such as stepping motor drives is not recommended. It is the objective of this invention to construct a remote antenna P-L and CH adjustment system using reliable, EMI free, motors and drives. Additionally, the invention of this application teaches a technique for preventing actuator damage by utilizing reversing relay limit switches. 
   Since convenient azimuth adjustments for antenna sectors (an array of more than one antenna acting as one antenna) are difficult to adjust manually, and until now are not available electronically, site planning personnel have not been able to take this problem into consideration. It is the objective of this invention to provide a simple, low cost and remote method for making CH adjustments without having personnel climb to the top of towers or other similar structures. 
   Since up to twelve antennas may make up a typical cellular antenna site, with all needing periodic adjustment, manually making down-tilt and azimuth adjustments is very labor intensive and expensive, and usually involves dangerous work high above the ground. It is the objective of this invention to improve and simplify the process of remotely and quickly adjusting antenna P-L and CH, with economical, cost effective hardware, and without the need for personnel to climb any towers or similar structures. 
   Systems that provide on site power and control of antenna adjustments may experience occasional tampering or interference by stray electrical transients. It is the objective of this invention to provide a secure, cost effective solution to the antenna adjustment requirement by providing a system that does not require on site power and computing or controlling capability. Additionally, one set of equipment may be used on many antenna sites by a single technician. 
   The details and many of the advantages provided by this invention will become clear and will be better understood by reviewing the following description and accompanying drawings, wherein: the preferred embodiment offers a system for remotely adjusting the P-L and CH of one or a plurality of communication antennas. 

   
     DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       FIG. 1  is a typical antenna sector mounted atop a tower showing major components of the invention 
       FIG. 2  is an upper bracket 
       FIG. 2   a  is a lower bracket. 
       FIG. 3  is an antenna sector with P-L and CH actuators 
       FIG. 4  is an antenna sector with P-L and CH positioners 
       FIG. 4   a  is an antenna sector with P-L and CH, (cut away showing P-L at its maximum) 
       FIG. 5  is a linear actuator, 
       FIG. 5   a  is a linear actuator (full half sectional view showing internal part detail) 
       FIG. 5   b  is a linear actuator (cut away full sectional view showing more detail in the motor-drive screw area) 
       FIG. 6  is a system block diagram 
       FIG. 6   a  is a system block diagram, showing details of the interface module 
       FIG. 7  is a software block diagram 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     FIG. 1 , shows a communications antenna system having, typically, four duplex transmitting and receiving cellular antennas mounted as a sector atop a suitable structure such as, for example, a tower. Furthermore, each cellular system tower may have up to three such sectors, each sector covering a segment that is usually ⅓ of a circle (120°). Referring to  FIG. 1 , a system for remotely adjusting the P-L and CH of one or a plurality of communication antennas, the subject of this invention is shown comprising: an antenna sector optimizer  10 , mounted atop a tower, one or more weatherproof field interconnection boxes  60  and  64 , an interconnection cable  62  running between the field boxes, one or more DC power sources  68  and  70 , and a laptop computer  66 . Although four antennas are shown to represent a sector in  FIG. 1 , this is not intended to be a limitation in scope, as one or a plurality of antennas may comprise a sector as defined by this invention. It is within the scope of contemplation of the inventor that the tower might be a building, a wall, or other appropriate manmade or natural structure. Furthermore, there may be one or a plurality of field boxes used, even though  FIG. 1  shows two boxes being used. The invention will work equally as well with one or many field boxes being used. Also,  FIG. 1  identifies a wire cable as the interconnection cable  62 , however, future technology might allow this cable to be fiber optic or other interconnection means. Although  FIG. 1  shows two DC power sources, it is within the scope of contemplation that any suitable power source such as, but not limited to, AC line power, “green” power, generator power, or similar power sources, could power this system. And finally, even though  FIG. 1  depicts a laptop computer, it is highly likely that a remote mainframe or desktop computer may also be utilized to practice this invention. 
     FIG. 2  depicts the upper down-tilt bracket  18 .  FIG. 2   a  depicts the lower down-tilt bracket  20 . 
     FIG. 3  is a cutaway view of the antenna sector optimizer  10 , showing two antennas making up the sector. Although  FIG. 3  shows only two antennas making up the sector, it is within the scope of contemplation that any number of antennas may be used to make up the sector. The antennas  12  are firmly attached to the tower by way of a mounting bar  40 , normally one of three positioned to form a triangle at the top of the antenna tower. These bars are welded to the tower thereby providing a fixed, rigid attachment. Each antenna  12  of the sector is attached to an individual electromechanical linear actuator hereinafter referred to as the P-L actuator  14 . The preferred embodiment of this invention utilizes the EZ Actuator™ linear actuator, however, other suitable linear actuators may be used to practice this invention. The antenna  12  of the sector is attached to the P-L actuator  14  by an upper down-tilt bracket  18  and a lower down-tilt bracket  20  ( FIG. 2  and  FIG. 2   a ). Although the preferred embodiment of this invention utilizes the EZ Tiltz™ brackets, any other suitably configured tilt brackets may be used to practice this invention. Another key bracket is the actuator bracket  28 . The P-L actuator  14  is attached to the mounting bar  40  by an actuator bracket  28  and to the antenna  12  using the upper down-tilt bracket  18  and the lower down-tilt bracket  20 . The assembly of these components provides the tilt adjustment of the antenna sector optimizer  10 . 
   Referring again to  FIG. 3 , in order to provide CH adjustment to the antenna  12 , the antenna sector optimizer  10  is provided with an additional electromechanical linear actuator hereinafter referred to as the CH actuator  16 . The preferred embodiment of this invention utilizes the EZ Actuator™ linear actuator, however, other suitable actuators, linear or otherwise, may be used to practice this invention. The CH actuator  16  is attached to the mounting bar  40  using a pair of U-bolt or universal fasteners  26  (only one is shown in the cutaway view). Each individual P-L actuator  14  is attached to a CH tie bar  30  through a pair of pitman arms  24 . The CH tie bar  30  is attached to the top of the CH actuator  16  with an additional upper down-tilt bracket  18 . The assembly of these components provides the CH adjustment of the antenna sector optimizer  10 . 
     FIG. 4  depicts an end view of the antenna sector optimizer  10  with the P-L actuator  14  in its minimum position and the antenna  12  in its least tilted position. A cutaway view,  FIG. 4   a , shows the same detail, but with the P-L actuator  14  in its extended position, and the antenna  12  in its full tilt position.  FIG. 4  shows that the lower down-tilt bracket  20  has one hinged part, and is clamped to the lower half of the P-L actuator  14  at a fixed position. Further,  FIG. 4  shows the lower down-tilt bracket  20  is bolted to the bottom area of the antenna  12 . It shows that the upper down-tilt bracket  18  is hinged in two places, and is attached at the top of the P-L actuator  14  and to the top area of the antenna  12 . This double hinge action makes the top of the antenna  12  tilt forward as the P-L actuator  14  is extending, and conversely, it makes the top of the antenna  12  tilt backward when it is contracting. 
   Continuing to refer to  FIG. 4 , the actuator bracket  28  is a casting or weldment forming a vertical surface having a tangentially positioned vertical tube on its back side. The P-L actuator  14  is inserted into the tube. Heavy grease is packed between the actuator and the inside of the tube as a means of dampening the rotational motion of the P-L actuator  14  caused by wind loading and other vibrational forces exerted on the antenna. The P-L actuator  14  is held vertically in place by a pair of pitman arms  24 , one located above the tube and one located below the tube. The pitman arms  24  limit the up and down movement of the P-L actuator  14 , and allow it to rotate with respect to the actuator bracket  28 . The pitman arms  24  are in turn attached to a CH tie bar  30  using pitman arm attachment pins  32 . Movement of the CH tie bar  30  causes all pitman arms to move such that the P-L actuators  14  attached to each and every antenna  12  in the sector rotate (change CH) together, thereby causing a uniform redirection of the antenna sector CH. 
   The CH tie bar  30  is attached to the CH actuator  16  by the upper tilt bracket  18 . This bracket has two hinges and is the same as the upper tilt bracket  18  used to attach the antenna  12  to the P-L actuator  14 . As the CH actuator  16  extends from its minimum length to its maximum length, the P-L actuators  14 , and thereby, the antennas  12  rotate through their full sweep of CH rotation. 
   Also shown in  FIG. 4 , are the CH detector  52  and the P-L detector  50 . 
   Antenna Sector P-L/CH Actuator 
     FIG. 5  shows a side view of an actuator  100  used in this invention for both the P-L actuator  14  and the CH actuator  16 . Both of these actuators ( 14  and  16 ) are motor driven linear actuators. In this invention, the EZ Actuator™ linear actuator is used for the P-L actuator  14  and the CH actuator  16 . It is within the scope of contemplation of this invention that other suitable linear actuators may be used. 
   The actuator  100  comprises three main parts, the actuator crown  102 , the dust shield  108 , and the main body extrusion  122 . During normal operation, power being applied to the internal motor, (as described below) causes the linear actuator to increase or decrease its length, and the distance between the actuator crown  102  and the main body extrusion  122  changes accordingly. 
   Details of the actuator  100  may be seen by referring to  FIG. 5   a . For greater detail, refer to the cutaway view of the central section of the actuator,  FIG. 5   b . The actuator crown  102  seats inside the top of the dust shield  108  and is pinned in place. The dust seal bearing  114  snaps in place in the bottom of the dust shield  108  with 3 interlocking rings set into matching grooves on the inside of the dust shield  108 . The linear ram  116  fits into a square socket on the bottom of the actuator crown  102  and is held in place by the same pins that hold the actuator crown  102  to the dust shield  108 . The dust seal bearing  114  slip fits over the outer diameter of the main body extrusion allowing movement up and down without allowing exterior particle contaminants to enter past the seal. The spines  120  fit into a channel inside the main body extrusion  122 . The motor mount  126  holds the motor  180  and the electronics control board (not shown) in the bottom of the main body extrusion  122 . Appropriate slots in the surface of the motor mount  126  allow the placement of the spines  120  between the exterior of the motor mount  126  and the interior of the main body extrusion  122 . The drive coupler  176  is attached by threads and a counter screw to the drive end of the motor  180 . The drive coupler  176  slip fits into the bottom of the drive shaft  170  and is held in place by the roll pin  174 . The anti-rotate lock cap  178  press fits around the bottom end of the drive shaft  170  and is secured in place by the same roll pin  174  that allows the drive coupler  176  to turn the drive shaft  170 . The spring loaded drive socket  164  is press fit into the top end of the drive shaft  170 . The geometry of the drive coupler  176  creates a linear movement in the drive shaft  170  and communicates with the anti-rotate lock cap  178  just before rotation begins. Lock teeth geometry at the interface of the anti-rotate lock cap  178  and the motor mount  126  prevent rotation of the mechanism when the motor  180  is not active and turning in either direction. This action defines the actuator&#39;s mechanical braking function. Four bolts hold the bottom of the spines  120  and the motor mount  126  to the main body extrusion  122 . 
   The drive shaft bearing spacer  172  is seated in the spines  120  and centers the drive shaft  170 . The drive nut  162  is screwed halfway onto the bottom end of the all-thread  118 . The lock bolt  165  is screwed into the bottom portion of the drive nut  162  against the face of the all-thread  118 , this locks the drive nut  162  and all-thread  118  together. The bearing block with thrust bearings  158  is located on the all-thread  118  between the drive nut  162  and the bearing position lock nuts  156 . The linear ram nut  152  is positioned an appropriate distance away from the top of the bearing position lock nuts  156  on the all-thread  118 . The linear ram nut  152  is pinned to the inside bottom of the linear ram  116 . The two ram bearing guides  110  are appropriately positioned to prevent the linear ram  116  from flexing out of alignment or rotating in its housing during operation. The all-thread end lock nuts  106  are screwed onto the top end of the all-thread  118 . 
   The limit switch rod position lock nuts  154  are placed on the limit switch rod  150  at the top and at the bottom so that when the linear ram nut  152  moves and contacts one of the limit switch rod position lock nuts  154 , it moves the limit switch rod  150  up or down accordingly. The limit switch rod  150  then moves the limit switch trigger block  168  up or down accordingly. The limit switch trigger block  168  then activates the limit switch  166  sending a signal to the field box(es) that the actuator (P-L actuator  14  or CH actuator  16 ) are at the end of their designed travel limit. A reversing relay immediately switches polarity to the drive motor. That relay is actuated by the limit switch. A capacitor is then positioned across the reversing relay coil. This capacitor provides a specific amount of time for the motor to reverse thus giving the trigger block sufficient time to clear the limit switch and eliminate bounce-back. Simultaneously, when the reversing switch is actuated, it closes a set of contacts that alerts the computer that the end of travel has been reached. 
   In an alternative embodiment of this invention to allow a cost effective solution to the problem of sweeping one or a plurality of antennas from one sector to another sector of the same cell site array, and then compliment the new P-L and CH settings of their new sector. This cost effective solution allows the system to balance sector traffic loads and access underutilized capacity in sectors that have capacity to spare. 
   Field Connection Interface 
     FIG. 6  is a signal block diagram for the system for remotely adjusting the P-L and CH of one or a plurality of communication antennas showing the antenna sector optimizer, the field box(es), the laptop computer, and the DC power sources. 
   Referring to  FIG. 6 , the P-L portion comprises a P-L actuator  14  and a P-L detector  50 . The CH portion comprises a CH actuator  16  and a CH detector  52 . Both actuators, in the preferred embodiment, are powered by standard DC motors. When DC power is applied with a positive polarity to the actuator, the actuator increases in length. When DC power is applied with a negative polarity to the actuator, the actuator decreases in length. When the motors are not being actuated, a shorting resistor is placed across the terminals of the motor thereby creating a method for dynamic braking. 
   There is one P-L detector  50  and one P-L actuator  14  for each antenna in the sector. A sector typically has from one to four antennas. The P-L detector  50  detects the antenna P-L with respect to true vertical or horizontal. Unlike sensors that measure antenna angle with respect to a tower member, this novel invention automatically eliminates errors caused by unavoidable changes in the base reference by using a P-L detector that incorporates an encapsulated electrolyte solution. In the preferred embodiment, this is a dual axis DX-045 detector sold by AOSI of Linden, N.J. 
   Each antenna sector has a CH actuator  16  to adjust the CH or direction of the entire antenna sector. Each sector also has a CH detector  52  for determining the actual CH of the sector. There is one CH actuator  16  and one CH detector  52  for each sector. A tower or site, may have multiple sectors. In the preferred embodiment, the CH detector used is a model TCM2-20 sold by PNI Corporation of Santa Rosa, Calif. 
   So that each antenna and each sector may be adjusted independently, each actuator (both P-L actuators and CH actuators) has a separate activation relay for the detector and separate activation relay for the actuator motor. This allows all antennas to be independently monitored and adjusted using one set of field boxes and one laptop computer by simply addressing each antenna P-L or each sector CH. An activation relay for the P-L actuator  14  is housed in the P-L actuator  14 . An activation relay for the CH actuator  16  is housed in the CH actuator  16 . An activation relay for the P-L detector  50  is housed inside the P-L actuator  14 . An activation relay for the CH detector  52  is housed inside the upper field box  60 . In the preferred embodiment, wires from the P-L detectors  50  are connected to their respective actuators. Wires from the CH detectors  52  are connected to the upper field box  60 . Wires from all actuators are connected to the upper field box  60 . 
   The field box  60  contains electronic circuitry to provide the signal conditioning and the logic selection for the specific antenna and/or sector being addressed. The P-L detector  50  is connected to the electronic P-L circuit board  74  wherein the amount of deviation from true P-L (that is, with respect to the earth&#39;s gravity) is converted into a 0-5VDC signal. This signal, in turn, is converted to an 8 bit digital signal by the analog to digital converter  76  that is compatible with the laptop computer  66 . 
   The CH detector  52  is connected to the electronic compass circuit board  84  wherein the amount of deviation from true North (that is, with respect to the earth&#39;s magnetic field) is converted into a 0-5VDC signal. This signal, in turn, is converted to an 8 bit digital signal by the analog to digital converter  86 , which is compatible with the laptop computer  66 . 
   In  FIG. 6   a , the interface module  90  relays the logical addressing and data reading function in response to commands given by the laptop computer  66 . Eight bit binary data from each detector is converted into two, 4 bit binary bytes by each of two octal bus line drivers  92  and  94 . The byte is selected by the laptop computer. Further, a third octal bus line driver  96  selects which of the two data sources the laptop computer is reading at any one time. Here, the laptop computer selects which detector is being read. This conversion allows the data from the two detectors to be transferred to the laptop computer over four wires, rather than the sixteen wires that would normally be required. Also, by addressing each antenna and each sector separately, the number of sets of wires needed to read all the data is substantially reduced from a maximum of 19 sets to just the 1 set. The 4 to 16 Line Decoder/Demultiplexer  98  selects the detector relay and the actuator relay that is requested by the laptop computer. This is not meant to be a limitation, but rather it is within the scope of contemplation of this invention that the 4 to 16 Line Decoder/Demultiplexer  98  could be potentially expanded to include additional such devices. Referring again to  FIG. 6 , to insulate the electronic circuits in the field boxes to transients and other electrical disturbances that may cause damage or malfunction, each box is provided with optical isolation circuits for each communication line. In the preferred embodiment, there are two boxes requiring two optoisolators  91  and  93 . 
   In the preferred embodiment, there are two identical sources of power,  68  and  70 , both of which are standard rechargeable 18 VDC battery packs. DC power  168  is connected to a voltage regulator circuit  72  thereby creating regulated voltages Vcc and 9_Vdc. These regulated voltages are needed to power the logic contained in the field boxes  60  and  64 , and the electronic compass  84  as part of the antenna sector optimizer  10 , and the electronic P-L board  74 . 
   In response to a command from the laptop computer, a forward/reversing relay  88  reverses the polarity of the 18VDC power circuit used to drive the P-L actuator  14  and the CH actuator  16  when it is desired to increase or decrease the length of either actuator. 
   In the preferred embodiment, power, control and computing functions are brought to and applied to the system by the technician while making adjustments. This is to prevent tampering or sporadic responses to outside disturbances, as would be possible in a system with on site power and control capability. Also, another benefit of portable power and user furnished computing equipment, allows the same equipment to be used on many antenna sites, thereby providing an additional cost effective solution to the optimization process. 
   Laptop Computer and Application Software 
   The key to the performance of this system for remotely adjusting the P-L and CH of one or a plurality of communication antennas is in the antenna optimization application software. In the preferred embodiment, the antenna optimization application software is run on a laptop computer. The computer having the antenna optimization application software allows the operator to remotely adjust the P-L of any antenna or the CH of any antenna sector merely by connecting the laptop computer to the optimizer system at the lower field box This eliminates the need for the technician to climb the antenna tower. By connecting the DC power source along with the laptop computer, the technician may perform the necessary optimization adjustments without the need for any other additional outside resources. 
   The system for remotely adjusting the P-L and CH of one or a plurality of communication antennas is not limited to use by a locally connected laptop computer. An alternative embodiment might utilize an on site desktop computer. Another alternative embodiment might utilize a mainframe computer. It is contemplated that computers located at other sites, connected by wire or modem, may also be used. 
   The antenna optimization application software can run on almost any personal computer (PC) with minimal specifications. The PC may be any one of the standard microprocessor types commonly found in use. Since large amounts of processing power is not necessary, any suitable 8 bit or greater microprocessor, such as for example an Intel 86286 or greater, with a processing speed of 20 MHz. or greater, may be used. The PC should have at least one standard parallel port, and a standard display. It need not have sound reproduction capability. 
   The application software for remotely adjusting the P-L and CH of one or a plurality of communication antennas operates under any version of MS Windows or other standard operating system that employs a similar architecture. 
   A block diagram of the application software is provided in  FIG. 7   a  through  FIG. 7   o . The application software  200  comprises an initialization routine  202 , followed by two operator prompts, connect to parallel port  204  and connect power source  206 , and a routine calibrating the electronic P-L and CH  208 . If wind is present  210 , the program branches to prolonged sampling  211 . If not, the program maintains its normal sampling and advances directly to the additional prompts. The program prompts the user to input the number of antennas in the array  212  (n), and input the number of antennas per sector  214  (n′). Then the program reads the P-L value from each antenna and the CH value from each sector, and stores the values in a memory array  216 . 
   The user is asked to select one of eight options  218 . If option 1 (Display All Current Antenna P-L) was selected  220 , the program branches to the option 1 routine. Option 1 proceeds to set the antenna address to 1  224 , read a new P-L value from the selected antenna  226 , store it in the memory array and increment the antenna number  228 , and pause 0.5 seconds to stabilize the system  230 . If the antenna number is n+1  232 , all the P-L values from the array are displayed  234 , followed by a return to the selection screen  236 . If the antenna number is not n+1  232 , then the program returns to read a new P-L value  226 . 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was not option  1 , then the program will test to see if option 2 was selected  238 . If option 2 (Adjust Individual Antenna P-L) was selected, then the program branches to the option 2 routine. Option 2 proceeds to initiate the antenna adjustment routine where the user is prompted for the antenna address to be adjusted  242 , actuates the address of the selected antenna  244 , read a new P-L value  246 , displays the new P-L value, prompts the user for a desired P-L value  248 , and determines if the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value  250 . If the new P-L value is smaller, the program branches to actuate the P-L actuator motor in a reverse direction  252  before proceeding to the next operation. Or, if the new P-L value is not smaller, the program continues to actuate the P-L actuator motor in a forward direction  254 . The program reads a new P-L value  256  and checks to see if the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value  258 . If the answer is no, the program returns to get another new P-L value  256 . If the answer is yes, the program stops the P-L actuator motor  260 , pauses 1 second  262 , and gets a new P-L value  264 . If the new P-L value is not within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value, the program returns to check if the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value  250 . If the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value, the program continues and displays the new P-L value  270  and returns to the selection screen  271 . 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was neither option 1 nor option  2 , then the program will test to see if option 3 was selected  272 . If option 3 (Adjust Complete Sector P-L) was selected, then the program branches to the option 3 routine. Option 3 proceeds to prompt the user for the sector number  276 , prompt the user for a desired P-L value  278 , selects the address of the first antenna in the sector and gets the new P-L value  280 . The program tests to see if the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value  282 . If the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value, the program branches to actuate the P-L actuator motor in a reverse direction  284  before proceeding to the next operation. Or, if the new P-L value is not smaller than the desired P-L value, the program continues to actuate the P-L actuator motor in a forward direction  286 . The program reads a new P-L value  288  and checks to see if the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value  290 . If the answer is no, the program returns to get another new P-L value  288 . If the answer is yes, the program stops the P-L actuator motor  292 , pauses 1 second  294 , and reads a new P-L value  296 . If the new P-L value is not within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value, the program returns to check if the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value  282 . If the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree  298 , the program increments the antenna address  300  and pauses for one second  302 . If the antenna number is not n′+1  304 , the program returns to check if the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value  282 . If the antenna number is n′+1, the program continues and displays the new P-L value  306  and returns to the selection screen  308 . 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was not any of the options 1 through  3 , then the program will test to see if option 4 was selected  310 . If option 4 (Adjust Complete Array P-L) was selected, then the program branches to the option 4 routine. Option 4 proceeds to prompt the user for a desired P-L value  314 , set the antenna address to 1  315 , activate the antenna address for the first antenna  316 , and get a new P-L value  318 . The program tests to see if the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value  320 . If the new P-L value is smaller than the desired P-L value, the program branches to actuate the P-L actuator motor in a reverse direction  324  before proceeding to the next operation. Or, if the new P-L value is not smaller than the desired P-L value, the program continues to actuate the P-L actuator motor in a forward direction  322 . The program reads a new P-L value  326  and checks to see if the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value  328 . If the answer is no, the program returns to get another new P-L value  326 . If the answer is yes, the program stops the P-L actuator motor  330 , pauses 1 second  332 , and reads a new P-L value  334 . The program then checks to see if the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value  336 . If the new P-L value is not within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value, the program returns to read a new P-L value  318 . If the new P-L value is within 0.1 degree of the desired P-L value, the program increments the antenna address  338  and checks to see if the antenna number is n+1  340 . If the antenna number is not n+1, the program returns to activate the antenna address  316 . If the antenna number is n+1, the program returns to the selection screen  342 . 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was not any of the options 1 through 4, then the program will test to see if option 5 was selected  344 . If option 5 (Exit Program) was selected, then the program branches to the option 5 routine. Option 5 proceeds to display the exit statement  346  and stop the program  348 . 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was not any of the options 1 through  5 , then the program will test to see if option 6 was selected  350 . If option 6 (reserved for future program—Initiate Auto EZ Optimizer) was selected, then the program branches to the option 6 routine. Option 6 is reserved for a future routine  352  whereby the antennas can be monitored and adjusted by way of the internet, intranet, or other modem based communication means. 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was not any of the options 1 through 6, then the program will test to see if option 7 was selected  354 . If option 7 (reserved for future program—Adjust Electronic Tilt) was selected, then the program branches to the option 7 routine. Option 7 is reserved for a future routine  356  that will allow the operator to adjust an antenna that has an internal electronic tilt system. 
   If the one of eight options  218  chosen was not any of the options 1 through 7, then the program will test to see if option 8 was selected  358 . If option 8 (Adjust Sector CH) was selected, then the program branches to the option 8 routine. Option 8 proceeds to prompt the user to select the sector  364 , actuate the address of the selected sector  366 , read a new CH from the electronic compass, and display the CH  368 . The routine then prompts the user for a desired CH  370 , and tests to see if the new CH is smaller than the desired CH  372 . If the new CH is smaller than the desired CH, the program branches to actuate the CH actuator motor in a reverse direction  376  before proceeding to the next operation. Or, if the new CH is not smaller than the desired CH, the program continues to actuate the CH actuator motor in a forward direction  374 . The program reads a new CH  378  and checks to see if the new CH is within 0.1 degree of the desired CH  380 . If the answer is no, the program returns to get another new CH  378 . If the answer is yes, the routine stops  382 . If option 8 was not selected  358 , the program proceeds to try again by prompting the user for a new option  362 .