Abstract:
Covers a method of producing a polyurethane by utilizing specific amine compounds as a catalyst in reacting an organic polyisocyanate with an organic polyester polyol or polyether polyol in the presence of said catalyst. Said amines fall within the following structural formula: ##STR1## where R 1  and R are lower alkyl and x=0-2.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention pertains to the field of urethane catalysts. More particularly, this invention relates to the use of certain amine derivatives as a urethane catalyst. 
     2. Description of the Prior Art 
     The use of a catalyst in preparing polyurethanes by the reaction of a polyisocyanate, a polyol and perhaps other ingredients is known. The catalyst is employed to promote at least two, and sometimes three major reactions that must proceed simultaneously and competitively at balanced rates during the process in order to provide polyurethanes with the desired physical characteristics. One reaction is a chain-extending isocyanate-hydroxyl reaction by which a hydroxyl-containing molecule is reacted with an isocyanate-containing molecule to form a urethane. This increases the viscosity of the mixture and provides a polyurethane containing secondary nitrogen atom in the urethane groups. A second reaction is a cross-linking isocyanate urethane reaction by which an isocyanate-containing molecule reacts with a urethane group containing a secondary nitrogen atom. The third reaction which may be involved is an isocyanate-water reaction by which an isocyanate-terminated molecule is extended and by which carbon dioxide is generated to blow or assist in the blowing of foam. This third reaction is not essential if an extraneous blowing agent, such as a halogenated, normally liquid hydrocarbon, carbon dioxide, etc., is employed, but is essential if all or even part of the gas for foam generation is to be generated by this in situ reaction (e.g. in the preparation of &#34;one-shot&#34; flexible polyurethane foams). 
     The reactions must proceed simultaneously at optimum balanced rates relative to each other in order to obtain a good foam structure. If carbon dioxide evolution is too rapid in comparison with chain extension, the foam will collapse. If the chain extension is too rapid in comparison with carbon dioxide evolution, foam rise will be restricted, resulting in a high density foam with a high percentage of poorly defined cells. The foam will not be stable in the absence of adequate crosslinking. 
     It has long been known that tertiary amines are effective for catalyzing the second crosslinking reaction. Typical amines of this type are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,012,445; 3,925,268; 3,786,005; 4,011,223; 4,048,107; 4,038,210; 4,033,911; 4,026,840; 4,022,720 and 3,912,689. However, many amines of this class have a strong amine odor which is carried over to the polyurethane foam. 
     In still other cases, some tertiary amines impart a color to the product foam known as &#34;pinking&#34; and/or cause or fail to prevent undue foam shrinkage. 
     In addition to problems of odor, pinking, etc., other tertiary amines suffer still further deficiencies. For example, in some instances the compounds are relatively high in volatility leading to obvious safety problems. In addition, some catalysts of this type do not provide sufficient delay in foaming, which delay is particularly desirable in molding applications to allow sufficient time to situate the preform mix in the mold. Yet other catalysts, while meeting specifications in this area do not yield foams with a desirable tack-free time. In addition, some catalysts of this type are solids causing handling problems. 
     Lastly, in many cases blends of catalysts containing different tertiary amine groups must be utilized in order to achieve the desired balance between gelling and flowing of foams. 
     It would therefore be a substantial advance in the art if a new class of amine catalysts were discovered which overcome the just enumerated disadvantages of the prior art. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     A new class of amine compounds have been discovered which have been found useful as polyurethane catalysts. Said amines fall within the following structural formula: ##STR2## wherein R 1  and R are lower alkyl and x=0-2. 
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The compounds useful here may be prepared by resort to a wide variety of synthetic techniques. However, preferably the appropriate alkoxy amine is condensed with formaldehyde and a lower alkanol. Thereafter, the intermediate derivatives are then hydrogenated over an appropriate catalyst such as nickel. 
     Preferably R 1  and R contain 4 carbon atoms, more preferably are methyl or ethyl and most preferably are methyl. 
     The compounds here possess a number of useful characteristics making them exceptionally attractive as polyurethane catalysts. For example, they have rapid catalytic activity in the polyurethane foam area. In addition, the compounds here are also relatively non-volatile and possess little, if any odor. Also, the compounds do not cause excessive pinking, so often observed when other tertiary amine catalysts are employed, particularly when polyester polyols are used to make urethanes. The catalysts of the invention are particularly desirable in foaming urethanes in that they provide a sufficient delay in the foaming operation to aid in processing. Yet the catalysts also give good foams with desirable tack-free times. This delay time is particularly desirable in molding applications to allow sufficient time to situate the prefoam mix in the mold. In addition, the compounds are easily prepared as typically described above, and are relatively inexpensive. 
     It has also been noted that the compounds described here in addition to being almost odor-free can be used to prepare foams such as polyester-based urethane foams without noting any substantial shrinkage in the foam so made. Lastly, they may be used as the sole catalyst source without resort to a blend of amine catalysts. Thus, the desired balance between foam gelling and flowing is obtained without resort to a catalyst blend, and a good reaction profile is obtained with sole use of the catalysts of the invention. 
     To prepare polyurethanes using the catalysst here, any aromatic polyisocyanate may be used. Typical aromatic polyisocyanates include m-phenylene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, polymethylene polyphenylisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-tolulene diisocyanate, dianisidine diiso cyanate, bitolylene diisocyanate, naphthalene-1,4-diisocyanate, xylylene-1,4-diisocyanate, xylylene-1,3-diisocyanate, bis(4-isocyanatophenyl) methane, bis(3-methyl-4-isocyanatophenyl) methane, bis(3-methyl-4-isocyanatophenyl) methane, and 4,4&#39;-diphenylpropane diisocyanate. 
     Greatly preferred aromatic polyisocyanates used in the practice of the invention are 2,4- and 2,6-toluene diisocyanates and methylene-bridged polyphenyl polyisocyanate mixtures which have a functionality of from about 2 to about 4. These latter isocyanate compounds are generally produced by the phosgenation of corresponding methylene bridged polyphenyl polyamines, which are conventionally produced by the reaction of formaldehyde and primary aromatic amines, such as aniline, in the presence of hydrochloric acid and/or other acidic catalysts. Known processes for preparing polyamines and corresponding methylene-bridged polyphenyl polyisocyanates therefrom are described in the literature and in many patents, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,683,730; 2,950,263; 3,012,008; 3,344,162 and 3,362,979. 
     Most preferred methylene-bridged polyphenyl polyisocyanate mixtures used here contain about 20 to about 100 weight percent methylene diphenyldiisocyanate isomers, with the remainder being polymethylene polyphenyl polyisocyanates having higher functionalities and higher molecular weights. Typical of these are polyphenyl polyisocyanate mixtures containing about 20 to 100 weight percent methylene diphenyldiisocyanate isomers, of which 20 to about 95 weight percent thereof is the 4,4&#39;-isomer with the remainder being polymethylene polyphenyl polyisocyanates of higher molecular weight and functionality that have an average functionality of from about 2.1 to about 3.5. These isocyanate mixtures are known, commercially available materials and can be prepared by the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,362,979, issued Jan. 9, 1968 to Floyd E. Bentley. 
     The hydroxyl-containing polyol component which reacts with the isocyanate may suitably be a polyester polyol or a polyether polyol having a hydroxyl number ranging from about 700 to about 25, or lower. When it is desired to provide a flexible foam, the hydroxyl number is preferably in the range from about 25 to 60. For rigid foams, the hydroxyl number is preferably in the range from 350 to 700. Semi-rigid foams of a desired flexibility are provided when the hydroxyl number is intermediate to the ranges just given. 
     When the polyol is a polyester, it is preferable to use as the polyester, a resin having a relatively high hydroxyl value and a relatively low acid value made from the reaction of a polycarboxylic acid with a polyhydric alcohol. The acid component of the polyester is preferably of the dibasic or polybasic type and is usually free of reactive unsaturation, such as ethylenic groups or acetylenic groups. The unsaturation, such as occurs in the rings of such aromatic acids as phthalic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, or the like, is non-ethylenic and non-reactive. Thus, aromatic acids may be employed for the acid component. Aliphatic acids, such as succinic acid, adipic acid, sebabic acid, azelaic acid, etc., may also be employed and are preferred. The alcohol component for the polyester should preferably contain a plurality of hydroxyl groups and is preferably an aliphatic alcohol, such as ethylene glycol, glycerol, pentaerthritol, trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, mannitol, sorbitol, or methyl glucoside. Mixtures of two or more of the above identified alcohols may be employed also if desired. When a flexible urethane foam is desired, the polyol should preferably have an average functionality of from about 2 to about 4 and a molecular weight of from about 2,000 to about 6,000. For rigid foams, the functionality of the polyol component is preferably from about 4 to about 8. 
     When the hydroxyl-containing component is a polyether polyol for use in flexible polyurethane foam, the polyol may be an alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydric alcohol with a functionality of from about 2 to about 4. The alkylene oxide may suitably be ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, or 1,2-butylene oxide, or a mixture of some or all of these. The polyol will suitably have a molecular weight within the range of from about 2,000 to about 7,000. For flexible polyether polyurethane foams, the alkylene oxide is preferably propylene oxide or a mixture of propylene oxide and ethylene oxide. 
     For rigid polyether polyurethane foams, the polyol should have a functionality of from about 4 to about 8 and a molecular weight of from about 300 to about 1,200. Polyols for rigid polyether polyurethane foams may be made in various ways including the addition of an alkylene oxide as above to a polyhydric alcohol with a functionality of from 4 to 8. These polyols may also be, for example, Mannich condensation products of a phenol, an alkanolamine, and formaldehyde, which Mannich condensation product is then reacted with an alkylene oxide (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,297,597). 
     The amount of hydroxyl-containing polyol compound to be used relative to the isocyanate compound in both polyester and polyether foams normally should be such that the isocyanate groups are present in at least an equivalent amount, and preferably, in slight excess, compared with the free hydroxyl groups. Preferably, the ingredients will be proportioned so as to provide from about 1.05 to about 1.5 mol equivalents of isocyanate groups per mol equivalent of hydroxyl groups. However, for certain shock absorbing foams we have found that by using the catalyst of our invention the mol equivalents of isocyanate to hydroxyl groups can be as low as 0.4. 
     When water is used, the amount of water, based on the hydroxyl compound, is suitably within the range of about 0.05 mol per mol equivalent of hydroxy compound. 
     It is within the scope of the present invention to utilize an extraneously added inert blowing agent such as a gas or gas-producing material. For example, halogenated low-boiling hydrocarbons, such as trichloromonofluoromethane and methylene chloride, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, etc., may be used. The inert blowing agent reduces the amount of excess isocyanate and water that is required in preparing flexible urethane foam. For a rigid foam, the use of water is often avoided and the extraneous blowing agent is used exclusively. Selection of the proper blowing agent is well within the knowledge of those skilled in the art. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 3,072,082. 
     The catalysts discovered here which are useful in the preparation of rigid or flexible polyester or polyether polyurethane foams, based on the combined weight of the hydroxyl-containing compound and polyisocyanate are employed in an amount of from about 0.05 to about 4.0 weight percent. More often, the amount of catalyst used is 0.1-1.0 weight percent. Most preferably, the catalysts here are employed to prepare packaging foams due to excellent gel properties. 
     The catalysts of this invention may be used either alone or in a mixture with one or more other catalysts such as tertiary amines or with an organic tin compound or other polyurethane catalysts. The organic tin compound, particularly useful in making flexible foams may suitably be a stannous or stannic compound, such as a stannous salt of a carboxylic acid, a trialkyltin oxide, a dialkyltin dihalide, a dialkyltin oxide, etc., wherein the organic groups of the organic portion of the tin compound are hydrocarbon groups containing from 1 to 8 carbon atoms. For example, dibutyltin dilaurate, dibutyltin diacetate, diethyltin diacetate, dihexyltin diacetate, di-2-ethylhexyltin oxide, dioctyltin dioxide, stannous octoate, stannous oleate, etc., or a mixture thereof, may be used. 
     Such other tertiary amines include trialkylamines (e.g. trimethylamine, triethylamine), heterocyclic amines, such as N-alkylmorpholines (e.g., N-methylmorpholine, N-ethylmorpholine, etc.), 1,4-dimethylpiperazine, triethylene-diamine, etc., and aliphatic polyamines, such as N,N,N&#39;N&#39;-tetramethyl-1,3-butanediamine. 
     Conventional formulation ingredients are also employed such as, for example, foam stabilizers, also known as silicone oils or emulsifiers. The foam stabilizer may be an organic silane or siloxane. For example, compounds may be used having the formula: 
     
         RSi[O--(R.sub.2 SiO).sub.n --(oxyalkylene).sub.m R].sub.3 
    
     wherein R is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; n is an integer of from 4 to 8; m is an integer of from 20 to 40; and the oxyalkylene groups are derived from propylene oxide and ethylene oxide. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,194,773. 
     In preparing a flexible foam, the ingredients may be simultaneously, intimately mixed with each other by the so-called &#34;one-shot&#34; method to provide a foam by a one-step process. In this instance, water should comprise at least a part (e.g., 10% to 100%) of the blowing agent. The foregoing methods are known to those skilled in the art, as evidenced by the following publication: duPont Foam Bulletin, &#34;Evaluation of Some Polyols in One-Shot Resilient Foams&#34;, Mar. 22, 1960. 
     When it is desired to prepare rigid foams, the &#34;one-shot&#34; method or the so-called &#34;quasi-prepolymer method&#34; is employed, wherein the hydroxyl-containing component preferably contains from about 4 to 8 reactive hydroxyl groups, on the average, per molecule. 
     In accordance with the &#34;quasi-prepolymer method&#34;, a portion of the hydroxyl-containing component is reacted in the absence of a catalyst with the polyisocyanate component in proportions so as to provide from about 20 percent to about 40 percent of free isocyanato groups in the reaction product, based on the polyol. To prepare a foam, the remaining portion of the polyol is added and the two components are allowed to react in the presence of catalytic systems such as those discussed above and other appropriate additives, such as blowing agents, foam stabilizing agents, fire retardants, etc. The blowing agent (e.g., a halogenated lower aliphatic hydrocarbon), the foam-stabilizing agent, the fire retardant, etc., may be added to either the prepolymer or remaining polyol, or both, prior to the mixing of the component, whereby at the end of the reaction a rigid polyurethane foam is provided. 
     Urethane elasomers and coatings may be prepared also by known techniques in accordance with the present invention wherein a tertiary amine of this invention is used as a catalyst. See, for example, duPont Bulletin PB-2, by Remington and Lorenz, entitled &#34;The Chemistry of Urethane Coatings&#34;. 
    
    
     The invention will be illustrated further with respect to the following specific examples, which are given by way of illustration and not as limitations on the scope of this invention. 
     EXAMPLE I 
     Preparation of the Catalyst 
     In a liter flask was placed 1500 ml of methanol and 198 grams of paraformaldehyde. To this slurry were slowly added 399 grams of methoxyethoxypropylamine. The reaction exothermed to 57° C. It was allowed to stir for 21/2 hours and then to stand overnight. The reaction mixture was then charged to a pressure clave along with 100 grams of a nickel catalyst. The clave was pressurized to 100 psig with hydrogen then heated to 100° C. The hydrogen pressure was increased to 1000 psig and held until the hydrogen uptake had stopped, after about 2 hours. The reaction was cooled, filtered through a filter aid and the methanol removed under vacuum. It was then distilled at 15 mm Hg with the product boiling from 80°-85° C. The product was N,N-dimethyl-3-methoxyethoxypropylamine. 
     EXAMPLE II 
     The following gives a typical foam formulation and reaction profile using the catalyst of Example I to prepare polyester-based urethane foams. As can be seen from Table I less catalyst of this invention is required versus two widely used commercial catalysts. 
     
                       TABLE I______________________________________        II      III       IV______________________________________FOMREZ® 50.sup.1          100       100       100Silicone L-532.sup.2          1.0       1.0       1.0Water          3.6       3.6       3.6Catalyst - Example I          0.5       --        --Palmityl dimethylamine          0.1       0.1       0.1THANCAT® DM-70.sup.3          --        1.0       --N-ethylmorpholine          --        --        2.0Toluene diisocyanate(80/20 isomer distribution)          44.5      44.5      44.5Cream time (seconds)          12        9         10Rise time (seconds)          81        68        78Appearance after curing at175° C. for 45 minutes          White     Pink      White          Good cells                    Good cells                              Good cells______________________________________ .sup.1 A polyester made from adipic acid, trimethylolpropane and diethylene glycol of approximately 2000 molecular weight available from Witco Chemical Co. .sup.2 A silicone product of Union Carbide Corp. .sup.3 A product of Jefferson Chemical Company, Inc., a mixture of 1,4dimethyl piperazine and B,Bdimorpholinodiethyl ether. 
    
     EXAMPLE III 
     The following demonstrates the use of the catalyst of Example I in a polyether-based flexible urethane foam. 
     
         ______________________________________THANOL® F-3520.sup.1 200NIAX L-6202.sup.2        2.0Water                    8.050% Stannous octoate in dioctylphthalate        0.8Catalyst Example I       0.6Toluene diisocyanate (80/20 isomer distribution)                    103.38Cream time (seconds)     8Rise time (seconds)      70______________________________________ .sup.1 A product of Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc., a propoxylated and ethoxylated glycerin of approximately 3500 molecular weight. .sup.2 A hydrolyzable silicone surfactant sold by Union Carbide Corp. 
    
     EXAMPLE IV 
     The following demonstrates the use of the catalyst here in a rigid polyurethane foam. 
     
         ______________________________________THANOL® RS-700.sup.1 36.3Silicone DC-193.sup.2    0.5Trichlorofluoromethane   14Catalyst Example I       0.2Dibutyltin dilaurate     0.08Mondur MR.sup.3          48.7Cream time (seconds)     19Tack free time (seconds) 45Rise time (seconds)      60______________________________________ .sup.1 Propoxylated sorbitol with a molecular weight about 700 from Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc. .sup.2 A silicone surfactant sold by DowCorning. .sup.3 A polymeric isocyanate available from Mobay Chemical Co. It has a functionality of about 2.7. 
    
     EXAMPLE V 
     This example will illustrate the utility of N,N-dimethyl-3-methoxyethoxypropylamine in the preparation of low density (0.5-0.6 pcf) urethane foams. These type foams are particularly useful for packaging applications. This experiment will further show the excellent latent gel characteristics of foams prepared using this catalyst. Latent gel is a measure of the ability of the foam to support a load at a predetermined time before the rise is completed. This property is very important in an assembly line operation where delicate parts or instruments would be encapsulated in foam prior to shipment. The low odor of the subject catalyst would also be especially advantageous in this type of foam. 
     Formulation, details of preparation, and foam properties are shown in the following table: 
     
                       TABLE II______________________________________Formulation              Parts______________________________________Thanol SF-2450.sup.a     100Water                    20Fluorocarbon R 113.sup.b 45Y-6690 silicone.sup.c    2.0N,N-diethyl-3-methoxyethoxypropylamine        4.0Mondur MR.sup.d          137.8Details of PreparationB-component temperature, °C.                    50-55A-component temperature, °C.                    50-55Cream time, seconds      3-4Rise time, seconds       35Gel time, seconds        35PropertiesBall penetration, in (25 sec)*                    4.0Foam density, pcf        0.55______________________________________ .sup.a Polyol from Jefferson Chemical having a hydroxyl number of 195 and which has a total amine content of 1.14 meq/g. .sup.b Trichlorotrifluoroethane; E. I. DuPont DeNemours and Co. .sup.c Silicone oil from Union Carbide Chemical Corp. .sup.d 2.7 functionality polymeric isocyante; Mobay Chemical Corp. *Procedure for Determination of Latent Gel of Urethane Catalysts As Follows 
    
     The B-component, comprising a 59.9:12.0:26.9:1.2 weight blend of Thanol SF-2450, water, fluorocarbon R-113, and Y-6690 silicone and a container of Mondur MR polymeric isocyanate were allowed to equilibrate in a 50°-55° C. oven. The B-component (167 g) and test catalyst (3-5 g) were then weighed into a one-quart ice cream container and mixed several seconds using a Hylift stirrer operated at 4200 rpm. Mondur MR (137.8 g) was then quickly poured into the B-component and stirred 1-2 seconds and poured into a 12-in×12-in×6-in cake box. After the foam had risen for 25 seconds, an 8-lb. iron ball was placed on the foam surface and allowed to settle in place. The 8-lb. ball exerts a force of 0.4 psi. To facilitate removal from the foam the ball can be encapsulated in polyethylene film. The amount of identation of the ball into the foam surface is measured with a ruler. The ball penetration figure above demonstrates an excellent latent gel property. 
     EXAMPLES VI AND VII 
     The procedure of Example I was used to prepare N,N-dimethyl-3-methoxypropylamine from 3-methoxypropylamine and N,N,dimethyl-3-ethoxyethoxyethoxypropylamine from 3-ethoxyethoxyethoxypropylamine respectively. 
     EXAMPLE VIII 
     The catalysts of Examples VI and VII were then used to prepare polyester-based urethane foams as per Example II. Results are as follows: 
     
                       TABLE III______________________________________Fomrez® 50     100        100Silicone L-532     1.0        1.0Water              3.6        3.6Palmityl dimethyl amine              0.1        0.1N,N-dimethyl-3-methoxy-propylamine        0.5        --N,N-dimethyl-3-ethoxyethoxy-ethoxypropylamine  --         1.0Toluene diisocyanate              43.8       43.8Cream time (seconds)              8          8Rise time (seconds)              73         67After 45 min. at 175° C.              White      White______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE IX 
     The catalysts of Examples VI and VII were also used to prepare low density packaging foam as per Example V. Results are given below. 
     
                       TABLE IV______________________________________THANOL® SF-2450              100        100Water              20         20Trichlorofluoromethane              35         35Silicone Y-6690    2.0        2.0N,N-dimethyl-3-methoxy-propylamine        5.0        --N,N-dimethyl-3-ethoxyethoxy-ethoxypropylamine  --         5.0Mondur MR          137.8      137.8B-component temperature              Ambient    AmbientA-component temperature              Ambient    AmbientCream time (seconds)              11         13Rise time (seconds)              50         55Gel time (seconds) 50         60______________________________________