Abstract:
An improved method for applying polymeric antireflective coatings to substrate surfaces and the resulting precursor structures are provided. Broadly, the methods comprise plasma enhanced chemical vapor depositing (PECVD) a polymer on the substrate surfaces. The most preferred starting monomers are 4-fluorostyrene, 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene, and allylpentafluorobenzene. The PECVD processes comprise subjecting the monomers to sufficient electric current and pressure so as to cause the monomers to sublime to form a vapor which is then changed to the plasma state by application of an electric current. The vaporized monomers are subsequently polymerized onto a substrate surface in a deposition chamber. The inventive methods are useful for providing highly conformal antireflective coatings on large surface substrates having super submicron (0.25 μm or smaller) features. The process provides a much faster deposition rate than conventional chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods, is environmentally friendly, and is economical.

Description:
RELATED APPLICATION  
       [0001]    This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/778,980, filed Feb. 2, 2001, incorporated by reference herein. 
     
    
     
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0002]    1. Field of Invention  
           [0003]    The present invention is broadly concerned with methods of forming antireflective coating layers on silicon and dielectric materials as well as the resulting integrated circuit precursor structures. More particularly, the inventive methods comprise providing a quantity of a polymer generated by the subliming of monomers into the plasma state by electric current and subsequent polymerization thereof onto the surface of a substrate.  
           [0004]    2. Background of the Prior Art  
           [0005]    Integrated circuit manufacturers are consistently seeking to maximize silicon wafer sizes and minimize device feature dimensions in order to improve yield, reduce unit case, and increase on-chip computing power. Device feature sizes on silicon chips are now submicron in size with the advent of advanced deep ultraviolet (DUV) microlithographic processes. However, reducing the substrate reflectivity to less than 1% during photoresist exposure is critical for maintaining dimension control of such submicron features. Therefore, light absorbing organic polymers known as antireflective coatings are applied beneath photoresist layers in order to reduce the reflectivity normally encountered from the semiconductor substrates during the photoresist DUV exposure.  
           [0006]    These organic antireflective layers are typically applied to the semiconductor substrates by a process called spincoating. While spincoated antireflective layers offer excellent reflectivity control, their performance is limited by their nonuniformity, defectivity and conformality constrictions, and other inefficiencies inherent within the spincoating process. As the industry approaches the adoption of eight-inch or even twelve-inch semiconductor substrates, the inherent inefficiencies of the spincoating process become magnified.  
           [0007]    When spincoated at thicknesses ranging from 500 Å to 2500 Å, commercial organic antireflective coating layers require polymers specifically designed to prevent molecular intermixing with adjacent photoresist layers coated and baked thereon. Although high optical density at DUV wavelengths enable these pre-designed polymers to provide effective reflectivity control at prior art dimensions, they have numerous drawbacks.  
           [0008]    Another problem with the currently available antireflective coating application processes is inadequate planarization. Organic antireflective coatings are usually formed by spincoating. The formed layers typically lack uniformity in that the thickness at the edge of the substrate is greater than the thickness at the center. Furthermore, spincoated antireflective coating layers tend to planarize or unevenly coat surface topography rather than form highly conformal layers (i.e., layers which evenly coat each aspect of the substrate and the features). For example, if an antireflective coating layer with a nominal layer thickness of 1000 Å is spincoated over raised features having feature heights of 0.25 μm, the layer may prove to be only 350 Å thick on top of the features, while being as thick as 1800 Å in the troughs located between the raised features. When planarization occurs with these ultramicroscopic feature sizes, the antireflective coating layer is too thin on the top of the features to provide the desired reflection control at the features. At the same time, the layer is too thick in the troughs to permit efficient layer removal during subsequent plasma etch. That is, in the process of clearing the antireflective coating from the troughs by plasma etch, the sidewalls of the resist features become eroded, producing microscopically-sized—but significant—changes in the feature shape and/or dimensions. Furthermore the resist thickness and edge acuity may be lost, which can lead to inconsistent images or feature patterns as the resist pattern is transferred into the substrate during subsequent etching procedures.  
           [0009]    Other problems can occur as well due to the fact that spincoating of these ultra-thin antireflective coating layers takes place at very high speeds in a dynamic environment. Accordingly, pinholes, voids, striations, bubbles, localized poor adhesion, center-to-edge thickness variations, and other defects occur as a consequence of attendant rapid or non-uniform solvent evaporation, dynamic surface tension, and liquid-wavefront interaction with surface topography. The defects stemming therefrom become unacceptable with increased wafer size (e.g., eight- to twelve-inch wafers) and when patterning super submicron (e.g., 0.25 μm or smaller) features.  
           [0010]    There is a need for an improved process of depositing antireflective coatings on various substrates. This process should overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks while providing for rapid deposition of the antireflective coatings.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0011]    The present invention overcomes these problems by broadly providing improved methods of applying antireflective coatings to silicon wafers, dielectric materials, and other substrates (e.g., silicon, aluminum, tungsten, tungsten silicide, gallium arsenide, germanium, tantalum, tantalum nitrite, mixed metal salts, SiGe, and other reflective surfaces) utilized in circuit manufacturing processes.  
           [0012]    In more detail, the inventive methods preferably comprise converting a quantity of an antireflective compound (which can be in the solid, liquid, or gas state) into a plasma state by applying an electric current to the compound under pressure. This is preferably accomplished by increasing the pressure of the system to a level of from about 50-200 mTorr, more preferably from about 70-150 mTorr, and even more preferably from about 95-100 mTorr. As the pressure is being increased, an electric current of from about 0.1-10 amps, preferably from about 0.5-8 amps, and more preferably from about 1-1.5 amps is then applied to the compound. For compounds having a boiling or melting point of greater than about 100° C., slight heating may be necessary as the current is applied.  
           [0013]    The deposition of the layer on the substrate is very rapid, much more rapid than conventional chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. More particularly, the layers are formed at a rate of at least about 100 Å/min., preferably at least about 130 Å/min., and more preferably from about 135-700 Å/min. on an eight-inch round substrate. It will be appreciated that this provides a significant advantage to the circuit manufacturing process.  
           [0014]    The antireflective compound comprises one or more types of monomers which can be selected depending upon the intended application conditions. After the monomers are formed into a plasma, the monomers will polymerize and deposit in a layer on the substrate. A layer of photoresist can then be applied to the resulting antireflective layer to form a precursor structure which can then be subjected to the remaining steps of the circuit manufacturing process (i.e., applying a mask to the photoresist layer, exposing the photoresist layer to radiation at the desired wavelength, developing and etching the photoresist layer).  
           [0015]    Preferred monomers comprise a light attenuating moiety and an unsaturated moiety (i.e., a group comprising at least one double bond and/or at least one triple bond), the latter of which readily reacts during the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process to bond with other monomers as the layer polymerizes on the substrate. Preferred light attenuating moieties comprise a cyclic compound such as benzene, naphthalene, anthracene, acridine, furan, thiophene, pyrrole, pyridine, pyridazine, pyrimidine, and pyrazine. Even more preferably, the light attenuating moiety further comprises a cyano group, a nitroso group, and/or a halogen.  
           [0016]    Preferred unsaturated moieties include alkenyl groups (preferably C 2 -C 20 ) and alkynyl groups (C 2 -C 8 ). The monomers should have a melting or boiling point of less than about 200° C., preferably less than about 150° C., and more preferably from about 10-100° C.  
           [0017]    Thus, preferred monomers for use in the inventive processes are those selected from the group consisting of styrene and substituted derivatives thereof (e.g., alkoxystyrenes, alkylstyrenes, halostyrenes, aminostyrenes, acetamidostyrenes, and nitrostyrenes) and allylbenzene and substituted derivatives thereof(e.g., alkoxybenzenes, alkylbenzenes, halobenzenes, aminobenzenes, acetamidobenzenes, and nitrobenzenes). Particularly preferred monomers include 2-methoxystyrene, 3-methoxystyrene, 4-methoxystyrene, 2-methylstyrene, 3-methylstyrene, 4-methylstyrene, 2-fluorostyrene, 3-fluorostyrene, 4-fluorostyrene, 2-bromostyrene, 3-bromostyrene, 4-bromostyrene, 2-chlorostyrene, 3-chlorostyrene, 4-chlorostyrene, 2-nitrostyrene, 3-nitrostyrene, 4-nitrostyrene, 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)styrene, trans-2-chloro-6-fluoro-β-nitrostyrene, decafluoroallylbenzene, 2,6-difluorostyrene, ethyl 7-[1-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-isopropyl-2-phenyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)-5-hydroxy-3-oxo-trans-6-heptenoate, flunarizine dihydrochloride, trans-4-fluoro-β-nitrostyrene, 2-fluorostyrene, 3-fluorostyrene, β-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)styrene, trans-β-nitro-2-(trifluoromethyl)styrene, trans-β-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)styrene, β-nitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)styrene, trans-2,3,4,5,6-pentafluoro-β-nitrostyrene, trans-1,1,1-trifluoro-4-(3-indolyl)-3-buten-2-one, a-(trifluoromethyl)-styrene, 2-(trifluoromethyl)styrene, 3-(trifluoromethyl)styrene, 4-(trifluoromethyl)-styrene, and 3,3,3-trifluoro-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-1-propene.  
           [0018]    The resulting precursor structures have antireflective coating layers which are surprisingly defect-free. Thus, there are less than about 0.1 defects/cm 2  of antireflective layer (i.e., less than about 15 defects per 8-inch wafer), and preferably less than about 0.05 defects/cm 2  (i.e., less than about 7.5 defects per 8-inch wafer), when observed under an optical microscope. Furthermore, these essentially defect-free films can be achieved on 6-12 inch substrates having super submicron features (less than about 0.25 μm in height). As used herein, the term “defects” is intended to include pinholes, dewetting problems where the film doesn&#39;t coat the surface, and so-called “comets” in the coating where a foreign particle contacts the substrate surface causing the coating to flow around the particle.  
           [0019]    The antireflective layers prepared according to the invention can be formulated to have a thickness of anywhere from about 300-5000 Å, and can also be tailored to absorb light at the wavelength of interest, including light at a wavelength of from about 150-500 nm (e.g., 365 nm or i-line wavelengths, 435 nm or g-line wavelengths, 248 nm deep ultraviolet wavelengths, and 193 nm wavelengths), and preferably from about 190-300 nm. Thus, the antireflective layers will absorb at least about 90%, and preferably at least about 95%, of light at wavelengths of from about 150-500 nm. Furthermore, the antireflective layers have a k value (the imaginary component of the complex index of refraction) of at least about 0.1, preferably at least about 0.35, and more preferably at least about 0.4, and an n value (the real component of the complex index of refraction) of at least about 1.1, preferably at least about 1.5, and more preferably at least about 1.6 at the wavelength of interest (e.g., 193 nm).  
           [0020]    The deposited antireflective layer is also substantially insoluble in solvents (e.g., ethyl lactate, propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate) typically utilized in the photoresist layer which is subsequently applied to the antireflective layer. That is, the thickness of the layer will change by less than about 10%, and preferably less than about 5% after contact with the photoresist solvent. As used herein, the percent change is defined as:  
       100   ·                    (     thickness                 prior                 to                 solvent                 contact     )     -                   (     thickness                 after                 solvent                 contact     )                  (     thickness                 prior                 to                 solvent                 contact     )                             
 
           [0021]    The antireflective layers deposited on substrate surfaces according to the invention are also highly conformal, even on topographic surfaces (as used herein, surfaces having raised features of 1000 Å or greater and/or having contact or via holes formed therein and having hole depths of from about 1000-15,000 Å). Thus, the deposited layers have a percent conformality of at least about 85%, preferably at least about 95%, and more preferably about 100%, wherein the percent conformality is defined as:  
       100   ·                    (     thickness                 of                 the                 film                 at                 location                 A     )     -                   (     thickness                 of                 the                 film                 at                 location                 B     )                    (     thickness                 of                 the                 film                 at                 location                 A     )     ,                             
 
           [0022]    wherein: “A” is the centerpoint of the top surface of a target feature when the target feature is a raised feature, or the centerpoint of the bottom surface of the target feature when the target feature is a contact or via hole; and “B” is the halfway point between the edge of the target feature and the edge of the feature nearest the target feature. When used with the definition of percent conformality, “feature” and “target feature” is intended to refer to raised features as well as contact or via holes. As also used in this definition, the “edge” of the target feature is intended to refer to the base of the sidewall forming the target feature when the target feature is a raised feature, or the upper edge of a contact or via hole when the target feature is a recessed feature.  
           [0023]    Finally, in addition to the aforementioned antireflective layer properties, the instant invention has a further distinct advantage over prior art spincoating methods which utilize large quantities of solvents. That is, the instant methods avoid spincoating solvents which often require special handling. Thus, solvent waste is minimized and so are the negative effects that solvent waste can have on the environment. Furthermore, overall waste is minimized with the inventive process wherein substantially all of the reactants are consumed in the process. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0024]    [0024]FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrum of a 4-fluorostyrene film deposited on a quartz slide by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0025]    [0025]FIG. 2 is a graph showing the reflectance curve of a 4-fluorostyrene film deposited on various substrates by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0026]    [0026]FIG. 3 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph showing the film conformality of a 1940 Å thick 4-fluorostyrene film deposited on 1000 Å topography by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0027]    [0027]FIG. 4 is an SEM photograph showing the resist profile cross-section of a 4-fluorostyrene film deposited by the inventive PECVD process and utilizing a commercially available photoresist;  
         [0028]    [0028]FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the UV-Vis spectrum of a 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene film deposited on a quartz slide by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0029]    [0029]FIG. 6 is a graph showing the reflectance curve of a 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene film deposited on various substrates by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0030]    [0030]FIG. 7 is an SEM photograph showing the film conformality of a 1735 Å thick 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene film deposited on 1000 Å topography by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0031]    [0031]FIG. 8 is a graph depicting the UV-Vis spectrum of a allylpentafluorobenzene film deposited on a quartz slide by the inventive PECVD process;  
         [0032]    [0032]FIG. 9 is a graph showing the reflectance curve of a allylpentafluorobenzene film deposited on various substrates by the inventive PECVD process; and  
         [0033]    [0033]FIG. 10 is an SEM photograph showing the film conformality of a 1698 Å thick allylpentafluorobenzene film deposited on 1000 A topography by the inventive PECVD process. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS  
     EXAMPLES  
       [0034]    The following examples set forth preferred methods in accordance with the invention. It is to be understood, however, that these examples are provided by way of illustration and nothing therein should be taken as a limitation upon the overall scope of the invention.  
       Materials and Methods  
       [0035]    The PECVD process to which the antireflective compounds were subjected in the following examples involved subjecting the compounds to sufficient electric current and pressure so as to cause the solid or liquid compounds to form a plasma. The monomers to be deposited were initially weighed in a glass vial (generally around 0.2 g). The vial containing the monomers was attached (via a rubber stopper) to a quartz chamber connected to a stainless steel pipe, with flow through the steel pipe being controlled by a needle valve. The quartz chamber was surrounded by an RF coil which, in turn, was connected to an RF generator. The RF generator generated the electric current in the quartz chamber through the RF coil. The quartz chamber was also connected to a deposition chamber in which the substrates were loaded.  
         [0036]    The deposition chamber and quartz chamber were evacuated by pressure (usually around 20-100 mTorr, preferably around 30-50 mTorr). The monomers to be deposited were kept in the glass vial. If the melting points or boiling points of the monomers were less than 100° C., pressure of 40-80 mTorr alone was sufficient to effect sublimation. However, if the melting points or boiling points of the monomers were greater than 100° C., pressure of 40-80 mTorr in conjunction with a slight heating was required to cause their sublimation.  
         [0037]    The needle valve was then opened by ¼ of a turn (it took 8 full turns to open the needle valve completely). The pressure inside the deposition chamber increased because the glass vial was not under vacuum. As the glass vial was evacuated and the pressure inside the deposition chamber increased to 95 mTorr, the RF plasma was turned on. The pressure during deposition was typically between 70-150 mTorr. The RF plasma power was set around 50-300 watts (preferably about 70-150 watts, and more preferably about 80 watts), and the mode was pulsed (i.e. in on/off mode, not continuous) at a duty cycle of 30% and pulse duration of 300 msec. The monomers were in a plasma state in the quartz chamber, and then polymerized and deposited on the substrate (six- or eight-inch flat wafers) in the deposition chamber. The substrate was rotated at 2 rpm in order to ensure a uniform coat.  
       Example 1  
     Deposition of 4-Fluorostyrene  
       [0038]    The antireflective coating layers were prepared by PECVD polymerizing a 0.2 g sample of 4-fluorostyrene (Structure A, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich) onto six- or eight-inch flat silicon wafers, topography wafers, quartz slides, aluminum substrates, tantalum (Ta) substrates, and tantalum nitride (TaN) substrates. Before deposition, the pressure was about 40 mTorr. During deposition, the pressure was maintained around 95-100 mTorr, and the temperature was room temperature (about 23° C.). The RF plasma power was set at 80 watts and cycled as discussed above. An initial eight runs on flat substrates were conducted to determine the best film thicknesses, optical properties, film uniformity, intermixing with photoresists, resistance to resist solvents, and adhesion to the various substrates. The topography wafers were used to determine conformal properties. The 4-fluorostyrene deposited at a rate of 136 Å/min. on an eight-inch substrate. This deposition time was much shorter than that of CVD processes. The structure of the resulting polymer is shown in Structure B.  
                         
 
         [0039]    The film thickness was optically measured by ellipsometry at 25 points on a planar silicon wafer to estimate the mean thickness. The films had uniform coating, without pinholes, voids or particles, with a preferred thickness of 1000 Å. The films exhibited a thickness uniformity of &gt;98% on the various substrates. The film thickness uniformity data is set forth in Table 1.  
                             TABLE 1                           Film Thickness Uniformity            Mean Thickness   Standard Deviation   Thickness Uniformity       (Å)   (Å)   (%)               3895   130   2.01                  
 
         [0040]    The deposited antireflective layer was also substantially insoluble in ethyl lactate. That is, very little thickness loss was observed using ethyl lactate. The stripping data is set forth in Table 2.  
                                 TABLE 2                           Stripping Test                Initial Thickness   Final Thickness   Stripping Estimate       Solvent   (Å)   (Å)   (%)               Ethyl lactate   3895   3852   1.10                  
 
         [0041]    [0041]FIG. 1 depicts the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrum of the deposited film according to this example (i.e., using 4-fluorostyrene deposited on a quartz slide). The λ max  was at 189 nm, thus demonstrating that 4-fluorostyrene-based antireflective films deposited by PECVD processes are useful for 193 nm applications. The optical density was 14.4/lm at 193 nm.  
         [0042]    The optical constants were measured by VASE analysis. The average n value (the real component of the complex index of refraction) and the average k value (the imaginary component of the complex index of refraction) were determined. The values were n=1.71 and k=0.59 at 193 nm. The optical density calculated from the optical constants was 14.4/μm at 193 nm. FIG. 2 shows the reflectance curve of the 4-fluorostyrene film prepared in this examples as deposited on the various substrates. The first minimum thickness was 350 Å, and the second minimum thickness was 900 Å.  
         [0043]    The film conformality was tested by depositing the 4-fluorostyrene on 1000 Å topography wafers. An examination of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph indicated that the film was nearly 96% conformal to the substrates over a topography of 1000 Å in height. FIG. 3 is an SEM photograph showing the film conformality of a 1940 Å thick film of 4-fluorostyrene on a 1000 Å topography.  
         [0044]    The 4-fluorostyrene was plasma vapor deposited on a silicon wafer to form a film having a thickness of 1077 Å, followed by patterning of a PAR-710 photoresist (obtained from Sumitomo Chemical Co.) over the antireflective coating film, and developing with CD-26 (obtained from Shipley Company, Inc.). The wafers were then cross-sectioned, and the resist features were examined with an SEM. FIG. 4 is an SEM photograph showing the excellent resist profile cross-section of this sample. Resist profiles as small as 170 nm dense lines and 170 nm isolated lines were achieved.  
       Example 2  
     Deposition of 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorostyrene  
       [0045]    The antireflective coating layers were prepared by PECVD polymerizing a 0.2 g sample of 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene (Structure C, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich) on six- or eight-inch flat silicon wafers, topography wafers, quartz slides, aluminum substrates, tantalum (Ta) substrates, and tantalum nitride (TaN) substrates. Before deposition, the pressure was about 40 mTorr. During deposition, the pressure was maintained around 95-100 mTorr, and the temperature was room temperature (about 23° C.). The RF plasma power was set at 80 watts and cycled as discussed above. An initial eight runs on flat substrates were conducted to determine the best film thicknesses, optical properties, film uniformity, intermixing with photoresists, resistance to resist solvents, and adhesion to the various substrates. Topography wafers were used to determine conformal properties. The PECVD rate was 667 Å/min. on an eight-inch substrate, which is a much quicker deposition rate than that achieved with standard CVD processes. The structure of the resulting polymer is shown in Structure D.  
                         
 
         [0046]    The film thickness was optically measured by ellipsometry at 25 points on a planar silicon wafer to estimate the mean thickness. The films generated uniform coats, without pinholes, voids or particles and having a preferred thickness of 1000 Å. The films exhibited a thickness uniformity of &gt;92% on the various substrates. The film thickness uniformity data is set forth in Table 3.  
                             TABLE 3                           Film Thickness Uniformity            Mean Thickness   Standard Deviation   Thickness Uniformity       (Å)   (Å)   (%)               1385   165   7.2                  
 
         [0047]    The deposited antireflective layer was also substantially insoluble in typical photoresist solvents (e.g., ethyl lactate). The stripping data is set forth in Table 4.  
                                 TABLE 4                           Stripping Test                Initial Thickness   Final Thickness   Stripping Estimate       Solvent   (Å)   (Å)   (%)               Ethyl lactate   1385   1315   5.05                  
 
         [0048]    [0048]FIG. 5 is a graph which depicts the UV-Vis spectrum of the film deposited on a quartz slide according to this example. The λ max  was at 181 nm, thus demonstrating that 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene-based antireflective films are useful for 193 nm applications. The optical density was 4.33 μm at 193 nm.  
         [0049]    The optical constants were measured by VASE analysis. At 193 nm, the average n value was 1.62, and the average k was 0.31. The optical density calculated from the optical constants was 4.33/μm at 193 nm. FIG. 6 shows the reflectance curve of this sample when deposited on the various substrates. The first minimum thickness was 450 Å, and the second minimum thickness was 1000 Å.  
         [0050]    The film conformality was tested by PECVD depositing 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene on 1000 Å topography wafers. An examination of the SEM photograph indicated that the film was nearly 97% conformal to the substrates over a topography of 1000 Å in height. FIG. 7 is an SEM photograph showing the film conformality of a 1735 Å thick film of 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene on a 1000 Å topography.  
       Example 3  
     Deposition of Allylpentafluorobenzene  
       [0051]    The antireflective coating layers was prepared by PECVD polymerizing a 0.2 g sample of allylpentafluorobenzene (Structure E, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich) on six- or eight-inch flat silicon wafers, topography wafers, quartz slides, aluminum substrates, tantalum (Ta) substrates, and tantalum nitride (TaN) substrates. Before deposition, the pressure was about 40 mTorr. During deposition, the pressure was maintained around 95-100 mTorr, and the temperature was room temperature (about 23° C.). The RF plasma power was set at 80 watts and cycled as discussed above. An initial eight runs on flat substrates were conducted to determine the best film thicknesses, optical properties, film uniformity, intermixing with photoresists, resistance to resist solvents, and adhesion to the various substrates. Topography wafers were used to determine conformal properties. The PECVD rate was 525 Å/min on an eight-inch substrate which is much faster than that of standard CVD processes. The structure of the resulting polymer is shown in Structure F.  
                         
 
         [0052]    The film thickness was optically measured by ellipsometry at 25 points on the planar silicon wafer to estimate the mean thickness. The films generated uniform coats, without pinholes, voids or particles, and having a preferred thickness of 1000 Å. The films had a thickness uniformity of &gt;96% on the various substrates. The film thickness uniformity data is set forth in Table 5.  
                             TABLE 5                           Film Thickness Uniformity            Mean Thickness   Standard Deviation   Thickness Uniformity       (Å)   (Å)   (%)               5140   283   3.37                  
 
         [0053]    The deposited antireflective layer was also substantially insoluble in typical photoresist solvents. No thickness loss was observed using ethyl lactate. The stripping data is set forth in Table 6.  
                                 TABLE 6                           Stripping Test                Initial Thickness   Final Thickness   Stripping Estimate       Solvent   (Å)   (Å)   (%)               Ethyl lactate   5140   5173   0.00                  
 
         [0054]    [0054]FIG. 8 is a graph showing the UV-Vis spectrum of the film deposited on a quartz slide according to this example. The λ max  was at 181 nm, thus demonstrating that allylpentafluorobenzene-based antireflective films are useful for 193 nm applications. The optical density was 9.55/μm at 193 nm.  
         [0055]    The optical constants were measured by VASE analysis. At 193 nm, the average n value was 1.64, and the average k value was 0.34. The optical density calculated from the optical constants at 193 nm was 9.55/μm. FIG. 9 depicts the reflectance curve of this sample deposited on the various substrates. The first minimum thickness was 400 Å, and the second minimum thickness was 950 Å.  
         [0056]    The film conformality was tested by PECVD depositing allylpentafluorobenzene on 1000 Å topography wafers. An examination of the SEM photograph indicated that the film was nearly 96% conformal to the substrates over a topography of 1000 Å in height. FIG. 10 is an SEM photograph showing the film conformality of the 1698 Å thick film of allylpentafluorobenzene on a 1000 Å topography.  
         [0057]    It will be appreciated that the superior method of depositing antireflective coating layers by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition has distinct advantages over the prior art spincoating methods which utilize large quantities of solvents. That is, the instant methods avoid the spincoating solvents which often require special handling. Thus, solvent waste is minimized and so are the negative effects that the solvent waste can have on health and the environment. Furthermore, overall waste is minimized with the inventive process wherein substantially all of the reactants are consumed in the process. Thus, the methods of present invention are lower in cost than most prior art methods and are also environmentally friendly. The PECVD methods also have a much faster deposition rate (i.e., less time is required to deposit the films) as compared to conventional CVD methods.