Abstract:
The present invention provides a vapor deposition apparatus capable of preventing abnormal film formation due to scattering in vapor deposition streams; and a method for producing an organic electroluminescent element which includes forming a patterned thin film with the vapor deposition apparatus. The present invention relates to a vapor deposition apparatus that includes a vapor deposition source equipped with a nozzle that ejects vapor deposition particles; an integrated limiting plate equipped with a first limiting plate including an opening that is in front of the nozzle, and with second limiting plates placed in the opening in the first limiting plate; and a mask including slits. The present invention also relates to a method for producing electroluminescent elements that includes a vapor deposition step of forming a patterned thin film with the vapor deposition apparatus.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a national phase application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/JP2014/069657, filed Jul. 25, 2014, and which claims priority to Japanese Application No. 2013-164389, filed Aug. 7, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. 
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to a vapor deposition apparatus and a method for producing an organic electroluminescent element. The present invention more specifically relates to a vapor deposition apparatus provided with a limiting plate that defines the paths of vapor deposition streams; and a method for producing an organic electroluminescent element which includes forming a patterned thin film with the vapor deposition apparatus. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Vapor deposition apparatuses are configured to form a thin film by heating a substance such as a metal or a nonmetal in vacuum to evaporate or sublimate the substance, and condensing the vapor on a substrate. The apparatuses are used in various fields. 
     For example, an organic electroluminescent (EL) display device providing full color display typically includes organic EL light-emitting layers in three colors of red (R), green (G), and blue (B), and displays images by selectively emitting light using the layers with the desired luminance values. The patterns of the organic EL light-emitting layers are transferred by, for example, a vapor deposition apparatus. 
     One method having been developed recently utilizes a vapor deposition mask smaller than the substrate to carry out vapor deposition while moving the substrate relative to the vapor deposition mask and the vapor deposition source, so that organic EL light-emitting layers are formed on the substrate that is larger than the vapor deposition mask (e.g. Patent Literatures 1 and 2). 
     PATENT LITERATURE 
     Patent Literature 1: WO 2011/034011 
     Patent Literature 2: JP 2010-270396 A 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       FIG. 23  is a schematic cross-sectional view illustrating a conventional vapor deposition apparatus employing scanning vapor deposition. The scanning vapor deposition is a method for forming a vapor deposition film on a substrate while moving (scanning) the substrate or the mask.  FIG. 23  shows the case where a film-formation target substrate (hereinafter, also referred to simply as a substrate)  115  or a vapor deposition mask (hereinafter, also referred to simply as a mask)  114  is moved in the direction orthogonal to the paper surface. In scanning vacuum deposition, as illustrated for example in  FIG. 23 , a limiting plate  113 , the mask  114 , and the substrate  115  are placed in the stated order above nozzles  112  of a vapor deposition source  111 . The positions of the components are adjusted such that the openings in the limiting plate  113  come to face the nozzles  112 . The limiting plate  113  is provided to prevent vapor deposition particles ejected from the adjacent nozzles  112  from being mixed. The vapor deposition particles ejected from the nozzles  112  form vapor deposition streams (dotted lines in  FIG. 23 ) and pass through the openings in the limiting plate  113  and the slits in the mask  114 , adhering to the predetermined positions on the substrate  115 . Adjusting the positions of the openings in the limiting plate  113  and the positions of the slits in the mask  114  enables formation of a vapor deposition film  116  at a proper position. 
     Vapor deposition streams usually travel linearly. However, scattering may occur in vapor deposition streams as illustrated in  FIG. 23 . The present inventors have studied the phenomenon, and have found that one of the factors causing scattering in vapor deposition streams is an increase in the vapor deposition density in spaces surrounded by the limiting plate  113 . In particular, when the ejection rate is set high or the nozzles  112  are arranged at narrow intervals in order to carry out the process, the vapor deposition density tends to be high. A high vapor deposition density is more likely to cause collision of vapor deposition particles, causing scattering. The scattering in the vapor deposition streams, though it depends on the level, may produce vapor deposition stream components with a different traveling direction from the desired direction (hereinafter, also referred to as abnormal vapor deposition stream components). When these components pass through the slits in the mask  114 , a microfilm  117  may be formed at a position other than the desired positions on the substrate  115  (hereinafter, this phenomenon is also referred to as abnormal film formation). 
     In the case of an organic EL display device, for example, such abnormal film formation may lead to mixture of light rays emitted from the light-emitting layers in colors of red (R), green (G), and blue (B) to cause abnormal light emission, thereby spoiling display qualities. 
     The present invention was made in view of such a state of the art, and aims to provide a vapor deposition apparatus capable of preventing abnormal film formation due to scattering in vapor deposition streams, and a method for producing an organic electroluminescent element which includes forming a patterned thin film with the vapor deposition apparatus. 
     One aspect of the present invention is a vapor deposition apparatus including: a vapor deposition source equipped with a nozzle that ejects vapor deposition particles; an integrated limiting plate equipped with a first limiting plate including an opening that is in front of the nozzle, and with second limiting plates placed in the opening in the first limiting plate; and a mask including slits. 
     Another aspect of the present invention is a method for producing an organic electroluminescent element, including a vapor deposition step of forming a patterned thin film with a vapor deposition apparatus that includes a vapor deposition source equipped with a nozzle that ejects vapor deposition particles; an integrated limiting plate equipped with a first limiting plate including an opening that is in front of the nozzle, and with second limiting plates placed in the opening in the first limiting plate; and a mask including slits. 
     The vapor deposition apparatus of the present invention can prevent generation of abnormal film formation due to scattering in vapor deposition streams. The method for producing an organic EL element of the present invention enables production of a high-definition organic EL element which involves little abnormal film formation. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a schematic perspective view illustrating scanning vapor deposition on a film-formation target substrate with a vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 2  is a schematic view illustrating one example of a scanning unit configured to control the movements of a vapor deposition source, an integrated limiting plate, a mask, and a substrate in the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 3  is a schematic cross-sectional view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 4  is a schematic view illustrating one example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 5  is a schematic view illustrating another example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 6  is a schematic view illustrating yet another example of integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 7  is a schematic view of the vicinity of an opening in a first limiting plate in which small limiting plates are placed in parallel with the direction of an ejection orifice of a nozzle in Embodiment 1 and in the vicinity of the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate. 
         FIG. 8  is a schematic view of the vicinity of an opening in the first limiting plate in which the small limiting plates are placed in parallel with the direction of an ejection orifice of a nozzle in Embodiment 1 and in the vicinity of the center of the opening in the first limiting plate. 
         FIG. 9  is a schematic view of an opening in the first limiting plate in which the small limiting plates are placed in parallel with the direction of an ejection orifice of a nozzle and in the vicinity of the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate. 
         FIG. 10  is a schematic view of an opening in the first limiting plate in which the small limiting plates are placed in parallel with the direction of an ejection orifice of a nozzle and in the vicinity of the center of the opening in the first limiting plate. 
         FIG. 11  is a schematic view illustrating the case where the small limiting plates are designed to be longer than in the case illustrated in  FIG. 7 . 
         FIG. 12  is a conceptual view of an integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 13  is a schematic view illustrating how a film is formed on a film-formation target substrate by scanning with the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1 in a top view. 
         FIG. 14  is a schematic view illustrating one example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 15  is a schematic view illustrating another example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 16  is a schematic view illustrating yet another example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 17  is a schematic view illustrating yet another example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
         FIG. 18  is a conceptual view of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of a vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2. 
         FIG. 19  is a schematic view illustrating one example of an integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2. 
         FIG. 20  is a schematic view illustrating another example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2. 
         FIG. 21  is a schematic view illustrating yet another example of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2. 
         FIG. 22  is a schematic cross-sectional view of a vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 3. 
         FIG. 23  is a schematic cross-sectional view illustrating a conventional vapor deposition apparatus that employs scanning vapor deposition. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the drawings based on embodiments which, however, are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. 
     Examples of devices producible using the vapor deposition apparatus of any of the following embodiments include those including organic EL elements, such as organic EL displays and organic EL lamps; and display devices including pixels. In particular, the vapor deposition apparatuses of the following embodiments are suitable for producing organic EL substrates and color filter substrates which require precise formation of pixels. 
       FIG. 1  is a schematic perspective view illustrating scanning vapor deposition on a film-formation target substrate with a vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. As illustrated in  FIG. 1 , the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1 is provided inside with a vapor deposition source  11 , an integrated limiting plate  13 , and a mask  14  in the stated order toward a substrate  15 . The substrate  15  is fixed by an electrostatic chuck (substrate holder)  18 , and is slidable in the XYZ axis directions. 
     Between the vapor deposition source  11  and the integrated limiting plate  13  and between the integrated limiting plate  13  and the mask  14 , a space is provided. The mask  14  includes slits, and the integrated limiting plate  13  includes openings. The longitudinal directions of the slits in the mask  14  and the longitudinal directions of the openings in the integrated limiting plate  13  are the same. 
     The vapor deposition source  11  is provided with nozzles  12  periodically formed in the right-left direction. The nozzles  12  individually eject vapor deposition particles toward the openings in the integrated limiting plate  13 . The vapor deposition particles forming vapor deposition streams (single-headed arrows in  FIG. 1 ) pass through the openings in the integrated limiting plate  13  and the slits in the mask  14 , thereby reaching the substrate  15 . 
     In the case of producing organic EL elements, organic materials and inorganic materials can be used as vapor deposition particles according to the applications. Organic materials can be used for light-emitting layers, hole injection layers, hole transport layers, electron injection layers, and electron transport layers, for example. Inorganic materials can be used for anodes and cathodes, for example. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 1 , the substrate  15  is scanned in the same direction (double-headed arrow illustrated in  FIG. 1 ) as the longitudinal direction of the slits in the mask  14 , i.e., the Y-axis direction, but the direction is not necessarily limited to this direction. In the example illustrated in  FIG. 1 , the vapor deposition source  11 , the integrated limiting plate  13 , and the mask  14  are fixed and the substrate  15  is moved, but the substrate  15  may be fixed and the vapor deposition source  11 , the integrated limiting plate  13 , and the mask  14  may be relatively moved. The movements of the vapor deposition source  11 , the integrated limiting plate  13 , and the mask  14  may be controlled integrally or separately. Some or all of these components are connected to the engine such as a motor, and their movements in the XYZ axis directions are controlled by a separately provided drive circuit. The control by the drive circuit is performed with reference to alignment marks, for example. The alignment marks are provided at the ends (four corners) of the substrate  15  and the ends (four corners) of the mask  14 , for example. 
     The integrated limiting plate  13  consists of a first limiting plate  13   a  including openings, and small limiting plates (second limiting plates)  13   b  formed in each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a . The first limiting plate  13   a  can prevent the vapor deposition streams ejected from the adjacent nozzles  12  from being mixed with each other. Also, the first limiting plate  13   a  roughly defines the directions in which the vapor deposition streams ejected from the nozzles  12  travel until they reach the mask  14 . The small limiting plates  13   b  are partitions formed to control the vapor deposition streams more precisely, and each have a size smaller than each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a.    
     The shape of each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  is not particularly limited, and may be a cuboid, for example. The size of each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  is appropriately changed to suit the design of the product. For example, in a view in the direction parallel to the upper surface or the lower surface of the first limiting plate  13   a , i.e., in a cross-sectional view of the vapor deposition apparatus, each opening has a size of, for example, 10 to 100 mm in length (x direction in  FIG. 1 ), 5 to 30 mm in width (y direction in  FIG. 1 ), and 50 to 500 mm in depth (z direction in  FIG. 1 ). 
     The integrated limiting plate  13  is preferably cooled (specifically, set to 20° C. to 80° C.) so that the vapor deposition substances adhering to the walls are prevented from re-evaporating. 
       FIG. 2  is a schematic view illustrating one example of a scanning unit configured to control the movements of a vapor deposition source, an integrated limiting plate, a mask, and a substrate in the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. In the example illustrated in  FIG. 2 , the vapor deposition source  11 , the integrated limiting plate  13 , and the mask  14  are combined at the ends, and thus can move integrally. The substrate  15  is fixed by the electrostatic chuck  18 , and the movement thereof is controlled separately from the vapor deposition source  11 , the integrated limiting plate  13 , and the mask  14 . The nozzles  12  are mounted onto the vapor deposition source  11 . Simultaneously when the substrate  15  and the electrostatic chuck  18  are scanned or the vapor deposition source  11 , the integrated limiting plate  13 , and the mask  14  are scanned, vapor deposition particles are ejected from the nozzles  12  in the direction indicated by the arrows in the figure. At each end of the substrate  15  and the mask  14 , an alignment mark  19  is provided to control the positions of the substrate  15  and the mask  14 . By scanning vapor deposition controlled with the above scanning unit, a desired vapor deposition film  16  is formed. 
     As described above, the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1 may include (i) a substrate holder configured to fix a film-formation target substrate, and a scanning unit configured to fix the substrate holder and relatively moving the vapor deposition source, the integrated limiting plate, and the mask; or (ii) a substrate holder configured to fix a film-formation target substrate, and a scanning unit configured to fix the vapor deposition source, the integrated limiting plate, and the mask and moving the substrate holder. 
     Also, in the case of forming a film with the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1, the vapor deposition step may be (i) a step of forming a vapor deposition film on a film-formation target substrate while fixing a substrate holder holding the film-formation target substrate and relatively moving the vapor deposition source, the integrated limiting plate, and the mask; or (ii) a step of forming a vapor deposition film on a film-formation target substrate while fixing the vapor deposition source, the integrated limiting plate, and the mask and moving a substrate holder holding the film-formation target substrate. 
       FIG. 3  is a schematic cross-sectional view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1, and the dotted lines in  FIG. 3  indicate the directions of the vapor deposition streams. Vapor deposition streams as a whole are ejected from the ejection orifices of the nozzles  12  to spread isotropically. Here, the substances at large radiation angles (angles from the direction of the ejection orifice of the nozzle  12 ) are blocked (filtered out) by the first limiting plate  13   a , so that the substances are limited to those at small radiation angles. The vapor deposition apparatus in Embodiment 1 limits the vapor deposition streams also with the small limiting plates  13   b  formed in the vicinity of the outlet of each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a . Hence, the substances limited by the first limiting plate  13   a  are further limited to substances at even smaller radiation angles, and then discharged to the outside of the integrated limiting plate  13 . 
     Even when the vapor deposition particles collide with each other and are scattered inside an opening in the first limiting plate  13   a , such two-step limitation significantly decreases the possibility that abnormal vapor deposition streams pass through the slits in the mask  14  because the small limiting plates  13   b  block the substances at large scattering angles. Thereby, abnormal film formation can be suppressed, so that the vapor deposition film  16  can be formed at a proper position. 
     The size of each small limiting plate  13   b  can be appropriately changed to suit the design of the product. For example, in a view in the direction parallel to the upper surface or the lower surface of the first limiting plate  13   a , i.e., in a cross-sectional view of the vapor deposition apparatus, the small limiting plates  13   b  may each have a size of 5 to 30 mm in length (x direction in  FIG. 1 ), 0.5 to 2 mm in width (y direction in  FIG. 1 ), and 10 to 50 mm in depth (z direction in  FIG. 1 ). 
     The vapor deposition particles tend to collide with each other in an environment with a high vapor deposition density. Since the vapor deposition density is likely to increase in the openings in the first limiting plate  13   a , the small limiting plates  13   b  are provided inside the openings in the first limiting plate  13   a . Preferably, as illustrated in  FIG. 3 , the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed along an interface S between the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  and the outside. This structure allows formation of an even more uniform film than in the case where the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed closer to the inlet of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a , i.e., closer to the nozzle  12 . 
     It is also advantageous to place the small limiting plates  13   b  inside, not outside, each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  from the viewpoint of the design activity. This is because the overall design of the film-formation pattern is implemented relative to the design of the openings in the first limiting plate. If the small limiting plates are placed outside each opening, the overall design needs to be re-implemented. Embodiment 1 achieves the effect of suppressing generation of scattering without changing this basic design. 
     The small limiting plates  13   b  in Embodiment 1 are integrated with the first limiting plate  13   a , which brings an advantage that separate cooling of the limiting plates is not necessary. Still, the small limiting plates  13   b  are preferably removable because a decrease in the precision due to accumulation of adhering substances, and a decrease in the vapor deposition efficiency due to clogging of the openings in the first limiting plate  13   a  can be eliminated. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates the positions of the small limiting plates in an opening in the first limiting plate in a cross-sectional view of the vapor deposition apparatus. This structure in a view in the direction perpendicular to the upper surface or the lower surface of the first limiting plate  13   a , i.e., in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus, is illustrated in each of  FIGS. 4 to 6 . That is,  FIGS. 4 to 6  each are a schematic view of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 4 , a supporter  13   c  of the small limiting plates  13   b  is in contact with the interface between the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  and the outside, and is positioned inside the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a . From the supporter  13   c , projections  13   d  extend toward the nozzle. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 5 , the supporter  13   c  of the small limiting plates  13   b  is in parallel with the interface between the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  and the outside, and is in both the inside and the outside of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a . From the supporter  13   c , the projections  13   d  extend toward the nozzle. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 6 , the supporter  13   c  of the small limiting plates  13   b  is not in contact with the interface between the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  but is in parallel with the interface and in the inside of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a . From the supporter  13   c , the projections  13   d  extend toward both the nozzle and the outside. 
     As described above, various shapes and arrangement positions can be employed for the small limiting plates. For example, as illustrated in  FIGS. 4 to 6 , the design of the small limiting plates  13   b  can be relatively easily implemented in the case where the supporters  13   c  of the first limiting plate  13   a  are placed in parallel with the interface between the outlets of the openings and the outside, and the direction of the projections  13   d  is orthogonal to the supporter  13   c . However, the arrangement of the projections  13   d  of the first limiting plate  13   a  orthogonally to the supporters  13   c , i.e., in parallel with the direction of the ejection orifice of the nozzle, causes the following problems. 
       FIG. 7  and  FIG. 8  each are a schematic view of the vicinity of an opening in a first limiting plate in which the small limiting plates are placed in parallel with the direction of an ejection orifice of a nozzle in Embodiment 1.  FIG. 7  shows an arrangement in which the small limiting plates are placed in the vicinity of the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate.  FIG. 8  shows an arrangement in which the small limiting plates are placed in the vicinity of the center of the opening in the first limiting plate. The dashed lines in  FIGS. 7 and 8  indicate the substances in the vapor deposition streams blocked by the small limiting plates. 
     Although the small limiting plates  13   b  are very effective in blocking abnormal vapor deposition streams, they unfortunately block some of the normal vapor deposition substances as well. The ranges indicated by the double-headed arrows in  FIGS. 7 and 8  indicate the regions in each of which a film is not formed (hereinafter, also referred to as non-film-formation regions). This is an unavoidable problem in providing a limiting plate in a vapor deposition apparatus. When such blockage of normal vapor deposition substances occurs partly, a film may not be uniformly formed. 
     Still, the level of the influence changes depending on the positions of the small limiting plates. For example, as illustrated in  FIG. 7 , in the case where the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed in the vicinity of the outlet of each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a , i.e., in the case where the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed side by side along the interface S between the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  and the outside, the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed as far away as possible from the nozzles  12 . Accordingly, unevenness between the film-formation regions and the non-film-formation regions is not likely to occur. 
     Meanwhile, in the case where the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed in the vicinity of the center of the opening in the first limiting plate  13   a  as in the example illustrated in  FIG. 8 , the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed at positions closer to the nozzles  12 . Hence, compared to the example illustrated in  FIG. 7 , the unevenness between the film-formation region and the non-film-formation region is more noticeable. 
     That is, the arrangement of the small limiting plates  13   b  illustrated in  FIG. 7  allows formation of a uniform film compared to the arrangement of the small limiting plates  13   b  illustrated in  FIG. 8 . 
     Also, in comparison between the example illustrated in  FIG. 7  and the example illustrated in  FIG. 8 , the example illustrated in  FIG. 7  in which the small limiting plates  13   b  are placed closer to the substrate is more effective in terms of preventing the influence of scattering in vapor deposition streams. 
       FIG. 9  and  FIG. 10  each are a schematic view of an opening in the first limiting plate in which the small limiting plates are placed in parallel with the direction of an ejection orifice of a nozzle.  FIG. 9  shows an arrangement in which the small limiting plates are placed in the vicinity of the outlet of the opening in the first limiting plate.  FIG. 10  shows an arrangement in which the small limiting plates are placed in the vicinity of the center of the opening in the first limiting plate. The dotted lines in  FIG. 9  and  FIG. 10  indicate the directions of the vapor deposition streams. 
     As is clear from comparison between  FIG. 9  and  FIG. 10 , the example illustrated in  FIG. 9  in which the small limiting plates are placed closer to the substrate achieves the blocking effect also on the vapor deposition streams in which scattering has occurred in the vicinity of the outlet of each opening in the first limiting plate. 
     As described above, in Embodiment 1, it is preferred that the small limiting plates (second limiting plates) are placed between the center of each opening in the first limiting plate and the outlet of the opening, and it is more preferred that the small limiting plates are placed side by side along the interface between the outlet of each opening in the first limiting plate and the outside. Thereby, the vapor deposition pattern can be transferred with an increased precision, which brings advantages such as achievement of high definition displays and an increase in the yield which increases the productivity. 
       FIG. 11  is a schematic view illustrating the case where the small limiting plates are designed to be longer than in the case illustrated in  FIG. 7 . The small limiting plates  13   b  can more suitably block abnormal vapor deposition substances due to scattering in vapor deposition streams as they are designed to be longer, but they are more likely to block normal vapor deposition substances if they are excessively long. The optimal length of the small limiting plates is 5 to 30 mm, though it depends on the desired design. 
     In order to solve the problem of no film formation, it is preferred that the arrangement of the small limiting plates in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus is also devised. 
       FIG. 12  is a conceptual view of an integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. As illustrated in  FIG. 12 , the small limiting plates  13   b  as a whole are arranged such that the projections  13   d  extending in the same direction as the longitudinal direction of the openings in the first limiting plate  13   a  are placed at certain intervals in the row direction. Also, the projections  13   b  are placed as groups in the substrate transport direction. More specifically, the small limiting plates  13   b  are divided into projection groups  13   e  each consisting of projections  13   d  placed in a line at certain intervals in the row direction, and the lines of the projection groups  13   e  are slightly shifted from each other in the row direction between adjacent lines. 
       FIG. 13  is a schematic view illustrating how a film is formed on a film-formation target substrate by scanning with the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1 in a top view.  FIG. 13  illustrates the case where the integrated limiting plate  13  and the mask are fixed and the substrate  15  is scanned from the top to the bottom (in the direction indicated by the arrow in the figure). 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 13 , the integrated limiting plate  13  in Embodiment 1 enables formation of a uniform vapor deposition film on the entire surface of the substrate  15  when all the rows are scanned. 
     In this manner, the integrated limiting plate in Embodiment 1 enables formation of a uniform film when scanning vapor deposition is performed by scanning the substrate or the mask, whereby the problem of generation of non-film-formation regions can be minimized. 
     The example illustrated in  FIG. 12  shows the conceptual positions of the small limiting plates in Embodiment 1, and this concept can specifically take the following forms.  FIG. 14  to  FIG. 17  each are a schematic view of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 14 , the small limiting plates  13   b  as a whole resemble a shape of a bookshelf. Specifically, the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of the supporters (beams)  13   c  and the projections (partitions)  13   d  alternately stacked from the bottom row to the top row. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 15 , the small limiting plates  13   b  as a whole resemble a shape of a bookshelf. Specifically, the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of a ladder-like part positioned around the center of each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a , the supporter  13   c  at the top row, the supporter  13   c  at the bottom row, and the projections  13   d  extending upwardly or downwardly from these parts. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 16 , the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of the supporter  13   c  at the top row, the supporter  13   c  at the bottom row, and the zigzag projections  13   d  extend upwardly or downwardly from these supporters. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 17 , the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of units in each of which the projections  13   d  extend upwardly and downwardly from each side of each projection  13   d.    
       FIGS. 13 to 17  each illustrate the state in which five units (five rows) of the projection groups occupy one opening, but the number of rows of the projection groups in Embodiment 1 is not particularly limited. For example, units of the projection groups may be placed at some cycles, with one cycle being five units (five rows) of the projection groups. 
     The vapor deposition apparatus of the following Embodiment 2 is also one preferred embodiment for solving the problem of generation of the non-film-formation regions. 
     Embodiment 2 
       FIG. 18  is a conceptual view of the integrated limiting plate in a top view of a vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2. As illustrated in  FIG. 18 , the small limiting plates  13   b  are directed to form an angle (specifically, to form an angle of 20° to 50°) with the longitudinal direction of the openings in the first limiting plate  13   a . Also, the small limiting plates  13   b  are directed to form an angle with the scanning direction of the substrate and the longitudinal direction of the slits in the mask. The vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2 is the same as the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1 except that the inclination of the small limiting plates in the top view is different. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 18 , the small limiting plates in Embodiment 2 as a whole are arranged such that the projections extend in a direction at an angle with the longitudinal direction of the openings in the first limiting plate, and the projections are placed at certain intervals in a matrix both in the row and column directions. More specifically, sets of two rows of the projection groups  13   e  each consisting of the projections  13   d  arranged at certain intervals in the row direction are placed in lines, and the projection groups  13   e  are shifted from each other by half a cycle in the row direction between adjacent lines. In other words, the small limiting plates are formed by placing the projection groups  13   e  periodically in the column direction (in the example in the figure, three cycles of two rows). The cycle unit of the projection groups  13   e  and the number of the cycles are not limited in Embodiment 2, but it is preferred that one cycle unit consists of 2 rows as illustrated in  FIG. 18  from the viewpoint of the efficiency. 
     The integrated limiting plate  13  illustrated in  FIG. 18  enables formation of a uniform film when scanning vapor deposition is performed by scanning the substrate or the mask. 
     The integrated limiting plate illustrated in  FIG. 18  can specifically have any of the following structures.  FIG. 19  to  FIG. 21  each are a schematic view of an integrated limiting plate in a top view of the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 2. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 19 , the small limiting plates  13   b  as a whole resemble a shape of a bookshelf. Specifically, the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of the supporters  13   c  and the projections  13   d  alternately stacked from the bottom row to the top row. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 20 , the small limiting plates  13   b  as a whole resemble a shape of a bookshelf. Specifically, the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of a ladder-like part positioned around the center of each opening in the first limiting plate  13   a , the supporter  13   c  at the top row, the supporter  13   c  at the bottom row, and the projections  13   d  extending upwardly or downwardly from these parts. 
     In the example illustrated in  FIG. 21 , the small limiting plates  13   b  consist of units in each of which the projections  13   d  extend upwardly and downwardly from each side of each projection  13   d.    
     The vapor deposition apparatus of the following Embodiment 3 is also a preferred embodiment of solving the problem of generation of the non-film-formation regions. 
     Embodiment 3 
       FIG. 22  is a schematic cross-sectional view of a vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 3, and the dotted lines in  FIG. 22  indicate the directions of the vapor deposition streams. The vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 3 is the same as the vapor deposition apparatus of Embodiment 1 except that the inclination of the small limiting plates is different in a view in the direction parallel to the upper surface or the lower surface of the first limiting plate, i.e., in a cross-sectional view of the vapor deposition apparatus. 
     Since vapor deposition streams as a whole are ejected from the ejection orifices of the nozzles  12  to spread isotropically, normal vapor deposition substances are not likely to be blocked when the angles of the directions of the small limiting plates  13   b  from the direction of the ejection orifice of the nozzle conform to the radiation angles of the vapor deposition stream (specifically, the small limiting plates  13   b  are arranged toward the ejection orifice of the nozzle). Hence, the example illustrated in  FIG. 22  can reduce blocking of normal vapor deposition substances, thereby forming a uniform vapor deposition film. 
     REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 
     
         
           11 ,  111 : Vapor deposition source 
           12 ,  112 : Nozzle 
           13 : Integrated limiting plate 
           13   a : First limiting plate 
           13   b : Small limiting plate (second limiting plate) 
           13   c : Supporter 
           13   d : Projection 
           13   e : Projection group 
           14 ,  114 : Mask (vapor deposition mask) 
           15 ,  115 : Substrate (film-formation target substrate) 
           16 ,  116 : Vapor deposition film 
           18 : Electrostatic chuck 
           19 : Alignment mark 
           113 : Limiting plate 
           117 : Microfilm