Abstract:
A network communication terminal apparatus compares a successive occurrence count number and a set threshold occurrence number of each error related to network communication operations, and when an error of which the successive occurrence count number is equal to the set threshold occurrence number is detected, an indication of the occurrence of this error is output to the user. In this way, the network communication terminal apparatus is able to accurately provide error indications that are relevant so as to secure reliability in the network communication operations of the apparatus while disregarding irrelevant error occurrences to avoid needless distractions.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates generally to a network communication terminal apparatus such as an Internet facsimile apparatus, and particularly to a network communication terminal apparatus that is capable of outputting an error occurrence indication of an error relating to the network communication operation to a user while exchanging data with a counterpart apparatus via a network. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     In a conventional network communication terminal apparatus such as a conventional Internet facsimile apparatus, sending or receiving an image is realized by attaching a file to an e-mail message. 
     Accordingly, connection with a mail server is periodically established in order to check whether there are any received e-mail messages and access the received e-mail, or to send e-mail. 
     In such a communication established via a network, a mail server lies between the present Internet facsimile apparatus and the counterpart apparatus corresponding to the destination of document data being sent or the sender of document data being received, and thereby, unlike the G3 facsimile apparatus that realizes direct communication with a counterpart apparatus via a phone line, errors are prone to occur, and various propositions have been made in the prior art to secure communications reliability. Examples of such measures are disclosed in Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication 2001-358883, Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication 2002-125090, and Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication 2002-204330. 
     In such prior art examples, reliability is secured by immediately signaling to the user that an error has occurred by displaying an error indication each time a network communication-related error occurs, that is, when trouble such as failure to establish a connection with the mail server occurs in network communications, the error indication is displayed until the problem is resolved. 
     However, there are cases such as when ADSL is used for network connection, for example, where connection may oftentimes be disturbed but may easily be reestablished, or where the server may temporarily be unable to respond due to overloading but may easily be restored back to normal. 
     Also, when exchanging document data via a network using e-mail, for example, oftentimes, the user may not be too concerned even when there is a slight delay in the arrival of transmitted document data at the counterpart apparatus side or the arrival of received document data at the present apparatus. 
     Thus, the user may be annoyed by the fact that an error indication is displayed every time an error occurs even for network communications-related errors of which the present apparatus is not the cause, and further, the user may be misguided into believing that there is a problem in his/her own apparatus. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention has been conceived in consideration of the problems of the related art and its object is to provide a network communication terminal apparatus that is capable of providing error occurrence indications that are relevant to a user without debasing the reliability in the network communications operation of the apparatus. 
     Specifically, the present invention in one aspect provides a network communication terminal apparatus that is adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, and output an indication of an error occurrence that is to be recognized by a user when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, the network communication terminal apparatus including: 
     an error/threshold occurrence number setting unit for setting and storing, for each type of the types of errors, a successive occurrence threshold number corresponding to a number of times the type of error is to occur successively before an indication of an error occurrence of the type of error is output; 
     an error/occurrence number counting unit for counting, for each type of the types of errors, a number of successive occurrences of the type of error; and 
     an error occurrence output unit for outputting an indication of an error occurrence of a specified type of error in a case where the successive occurrence number of each type of error counted by the error/occurrence number counting unit and the threshold occurrence number of each type of error set by the error/threshold occurrence number setting unit are compared to find that the successive occurrence number of the specified type of error is equal to the threshold occurrence number of the specified type of error. 
     In the present invention, an error occurrence indication is not made to the user each time an error related to the network communication operation occurs; rather, an error occurrence indication to the user is not made until the error occurs successively for a predetermined number of times. Also, the predetermined number of times may be individually set for each type of error so that adjustments may be made according to the network line environment or the server environment, for example. Accordingly, flexibility can be provided in setting the predetermined number, and, for example, a small value may be set for a grave error whereas a large value may be set for trivial errors that can be easily resolved without taking any heed thereof. Thus, by accurately providing error indications that are relevant for securing reliability in the network communication, operability of the apparatus may be greatly improved. 
     According to another embodiment of the present invention, a network communication terminal apparatus, adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, and output an indication of an error occurrence that is to be recognized by a user when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, includes: 
     an error group/threshold occurrence number setting unit for dividing the types of errors into a plurality of error groups by categorically grouping the types of errors and setting and storing, for each group of the error groups, a successive occurrence threshold number corresponding to a number of times one or more types of errors belonging to the error group are to occur successively before an indication of an error occurrence of the error group is output; 
     an error/occurrence number counting unit for counting, for each type of error, a number of successive occurrences of the type of error; and 
     an error group occurrence output unit for outputting an indication of an error occurrence of a specified error group in a case where the successive occurrence number of each error group counted by the error/occurrence number counting unit, and the threshold occurrence number of each error group set by the error/threshold occurrence number setting unit are compared to find that the successive occurrence number of the specified error group is equal to the threshold occurrence number of the specified error group. 
     In the present embodiment, errors are categorically grouped into error groups so that setting adjustments according to environmental conditions may be easily made, and thus, the operability of the apparatus may be improved. 
     According to another embodiment of the present invention, a network communication terminal apparatus, adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, and output an indication of an error occurrence that is to be recognized by a user when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, includes: 
     a specified error/threshold occurrence number setting unit for setting and storing a predetermined successive occurrence threshold number for a specified type of the types of errors, the predetermined successive occurrence number corresponding to a number of times the specified type of error is to occur successively before an indication of an error occurrence of the specified type of error is output; 
     a specified error/occurrence number counting unit for counting a number of successive occurrences of the specified type of error; and 
     a specified error occurrence output unit for outputting the indication of the error occurrence of the specified type of error in a case where the successive occurrence number of the specified type of error counted by the specified error/occurrence number counting unit and the threshold occurrence number of the specifies type of error set by the specified error/threshold occurrence number setting unit are compared to find that the successive occurrence number is equal to the threshold occurrence number. 
     In the present invention, an indication of an occurrence of a specified error is arranged to be output after this specified error occurs successively for a preset number of times. Thus, in an environment where a particular error is likely to occur on a frequent basis, the error occurrence indication system may be easily adjusted so that operability of the apparatus may be improved. 
     According to another embodiment of the present invention, a network communication terminal apparatus, adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, and output an indication of an error occurrence that is to be recognized by a user when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, includes: 
     an unspecified error/threshold occurrence number setting unit for setting and storing a predetermined successive occurrence threshold number corresponding to a number of times unspecified types of the types of errors are to occur successively before the indication of the error occurrence is output; 
     an unspecified error/occurrence number counting unit for counting a number of successive occurrences of the unspecified types of errors; and 
     an unspecified error occurrence output unit for outputting the indication of the error occurrence in a case where the successive occurrence number of the unspecified types of errors counted by the unspecified error/occurrence number counting unit and the threshold occurrence number of the unspecified types of errors set by the unspecified error/threshold occurrence number setting unit are compared to find that the successive occurrence number is equal to the threshold occurrence number. 
     In the present embodiment, the various types of errors related to the network communication operation are not distinguished, and they are collectively handled as errors related to the network communication operation. Thus, error occurrence indications may be made for random errors that may occur upon using various protocols and applications so that operability of the apparatus may be improved. In other words, when numerous applications are used, it is more likely for a plurality of errors to occur at the same time. Thus, the present invention is suitable for use in cases where error indication based on the occurrence of a particular type of error is difficult. 
     In a further embodiment, the network communication terminal apparatuses of the present invention may include: 
     an error occurrence hysteresis storage unit for storing error occurrence hysteresis information for each type of error; and 
     an error occurrence hysteresis output unit for outputting the stored error occurrence hysteresis information. 
     In the present invention, an error occurrence is recorded regardless of whether an error indication is to be made so that the error occurrence status may be easily determined, and the recorded contents may be referred to during a maintenance operation, for example. In this way, the determination of the setting value for the threshold occurrence number may be facilitated, and maintenance qualities of the apparatus may be improved. 
     The present invention in another aspect provides a method of providing an error occurrence indication to a user in a network communication terminal apparatus that is adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, the error occurrence indication being output when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, the method including: 
     comparing a successive occurrence count number and a predetermined threshold occurrence number of each of the types of errors; and 
     outputting an error occurrence indication of a specified type of error of which the successive occurrence count number is determined to be equal to the predetermined threshold occurrence number in the comparing step. 
     According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for providing an error occurrence indication to a user in a network communication terminal apparatus that is adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, the error occurrence indication being output when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, the method including: 
     comparing a successive occurrence count number and a predetermined threshold occurrence number of each of error groups into which the types of errors are categorically grouped; and 
     outputting an error occurrence indication of a specified error group of which the successive occurrence count number is determined to be equal to the predetermined threshold occurrence number in the comparing step. 
     According to another embodiment, a method is provided for providing an error occurrence indication to a user in a network communication terminal apparatus that is adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, the error occurrence indication being output when one or more of a plurality of types of errors relating to a network communication operation occur, the method including: 
     comparing a successive occurrence count number and a predetermined threshold occurrence number of a specified type of error; and 
     outputting an error occurrence indication of the specified type of error when it is determined in the comparing step that the successive occurrence count number is equal to the predetermined threshold occurrence number. 
     According to another embodiment, a method is provided for providing an error occurrence indication to a user in a network communication terminal apparatus that is adapted to exchange data with a counterpart apparatus via a network, the error occurrence indication being output when one or more errors relating to a network communication operation occur, the method including: 
     comparing a successive occurrence count number and a predetermined threshold occurrence number of the errors; and 
     outputting the error occurrence indication when it is determined in the comparing step that the successive occurrence count number is equal to the predetermined threshold occurrence number. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating a network configuration connecting an Internet facsimile apparatus corresponding to a network communication terminal apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 2  is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the Internet facsimile apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 3  is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of an operations display unit of the Internet facsimile apparatus; 
         FIG. 4  is a block diagram illustrating storage contents of a ROM of the Internet facsimile apparatus; 
         FIG. 5  is a block diagram illustrating storage contents of a RAM of the Internet facsimile apparatus; 
         FIG. 6  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error number/error content character string storage unit of the ROM; 
         FIG. 7  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error number/threshold occurrence number setting unit of the RAM; 
         FIG. 8  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error number/occurrence number storage unit of the RAM. 
         FIG. 9  is a flowchart illustrating common processing procedures for first, second, third, and fourth embodiments of the present invention. 
         FIG. 10  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing a network connection process according to the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 11  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing an error occurrence responding process according to the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 12  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error occurrence hysteresis storage unit of the RAM; 
         FIG. 13  is a diagram illustrating an example of an error indication that is displayed in the processing procedures of  FIG. 11 ; 
         FIG. 14  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error number/corresponding error group storage unit of the ROM; 
         FIG. 15  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error group number/error group content character string storage unit of the ROM; 
         FIG. 16  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error group number/threshold occurrence number setting unit of the RAM; 
         FIG. 17  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of an error group number/occurrence number storage unit of the RAM; 
         FIG. 18  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing a network connection process according to the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 19  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing an error occurrence responding process according to the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 20  is a diagram illustrating an example of an error indication that is displayed in the processing procedures of  FIG. 19 ; 
         FIG. 21  is a diagram illustrating specific storage contents of a storage area of the RAM; 
         FIG. 22  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing a network connection process according to the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 23  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing an error occurrence responding process according to the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 24  is a diagram illustrating an example of an error indication that is displayed in the processing procedures of  FIG. 23 ; 
         FIG. 25  is a diagram illustrating specific storage contents of another storage area of the RAM; 
         FIG. 26  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing a network connection process according to the fourth embodiment; 
         FIG. 27  is a flowchart illustrating specific processing procedures for realizing an error occurrence responding process according to the fourth embodiment; and 
         FIG. 28  is a diagram illustrating an example of an error indication that is displayed in the processing procedures of  FIG. 24 . 
     
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     In the following, preferred embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings. 
       FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating a circuit/network configuration that is implemented between an Internet facsimile apparatus and its counterpart Internet facsimile apparatus as a network communication terminal apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. 
     In  FIG. 1 , a packet sent from the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  is input to an ADSL modem  22  via a LAN  20  and a router  21  where the packet is divided into ATM cells and then converted into a high frequency electric signal. The high frequency signal, which is exchanged between the ADSL modem  22  and a station side ADSL collective modem  30  via a subscriber line  25 , is separated from a low frequency audio signal by a station side splitter  26 . This audio signal is exchanged between a telephone  24  and a telephone  29  via a telephone exchange  27  and a public telephone network  28 . 
     The station side ADSL collective modem  30  receives the high frequency signal from the ADSL modem  20  and reconverts the signal back to the ATM cells to send these cells to an ISP (Internet service provider) server  32  via an ATM network  31 . The ISP server  32  may function as an SMTP server for the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  to realize mail transmission, and as a POP server, a confirmation server, and other various servers to realize mail reception. 
     A packet that is to be sent to the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  from the ISP server  32  follows a reverse route of the above-described route. 
     In this way, the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  may realize mail transmission by SMTP and mail reception by POP via the ISP server  32 . 
     The Internet facsimile apparatus  36  corresponding to the counterpart apparatus may be connected to a counterpart ISP server  34  via a counterpart circuit/network  35  that may be in various formats. In such a setting, the ISP server  32  and the ISP server  34  may be arranged to exchange e-mail via the Internet  33  so that the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  and the Internet facsimile apparatus  36  are able to exchange document data by e-mail. Herein, even when there is no fault in the Internet facsimile apparatuses  1  and  36 , the communication between the apparatuses may be disrupted by trouble occurring in the ISP server  32  such as a fault in the POP sever function or the SMTP function of the ISP server  32 . However, such faults may oftentimes be set right in a short period of time, unlike trouble occurring in facsimile communications realized via a conventional public telephone line such as a paper-out condition on the counterpart apparatus side or an error occurring during communication, for example. 
     It is noted that the connection of the Internet facsimile apparatus to a network such as the Internet is not limited to a configuration as described in  FIG. 1 . For example, the connection to a server may also be realized via a LAN. In other words, the present invention is not limited to a particular network connection mode of the Internet facsimile apparatus  1 , and the connection may take any form. 
       FIG. 2  is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  as a network communication terminal apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. 
     In this drawing, the facsimile apparatus  1  includes a system control unit  2 , a ROM  3 , a RAM  4 , a scanner  5 , a plotter  6 , an operations display unit  7 , an encoder/decoder unit  8 , an accumulation memory  9 , a clock circuit  10 , a network communication control unit  11 , a LAN control unit  12 , an I/O port  13 , a buffer circuit  13   a  and a speaker  13   b  that are connected to the I/O port  13 , and a system bus  14 . 
     The system control unit  2  corresponds to a microcomputer that controls each unit of the facsimile apparatus  1  according to control programs written in the ROM  3  and using the RAM  4  as a working area. The ROM  3  corresponds to a read-only memory storing the control programs for the system control unit  2  to control the units of the facsimile apparatus  1 . The RAM  4  corresponds to a random-access memory that is used as a working area of the system control unit  2 . 
     The scanner  5  reads an original image at a predetermined read line density, for example, at 3.85 lines/mm, 7.7 lines/mm, or 15.4 lines/mm, to obtain image information of the original image. The plotter  6  has functions of outputting/recording received image information according to its predetermined line density, and outputting/recording image information read by the scanner  5  according to its line density, for example (the outputting/recording corresponding to a copying operation). 
     The operations display unit  7  has various keys for accepting various operation inputs from a user and a display unit such as a liquid crystal display apparatus for displaying various messages to a user such as an operation state of the apparatus of which the user should be notified. 
     The encoder/decoder unit  8  has functions of compressing transmission image data according to a predetermined format compatible with facsimile such as the MH encoding format, the MR encoding format, and the MMR encoding format, for example, and decompressing received image data according to a decoding format corresponding to the predetermined encoding format such as the MH encoding format, the MR encoding format, and the MMR encoding format. 
     The accumulation memory  9  corresponds to a large capacity memory for temporarily accumulating document data yet to be transmitted, or received document data yet to be output, for example. 
     The clock circuit  10  keeps track of the current time and date based on an oscillation frequency of a crystal oscillator. The system control unit  2  may obtain information pertaining to the current time and date by reading a signal from the clock circuit  10  via a system bus  14 . 
     The network communication control unit  11  controls various network protocols such as the TCP/IP protocol on the LAN that is controlled by the LAN control unit  12 , the POP protocol for realizing mail reception, and the SMTP protocol for realizing mail transmission, for example. 
     The LAN control unit  12  corresponds to a physical interface with a LAN  20 , and has the function of controlling the LAN protocol. 
     The I/O port  13  is connected to the speaker  13   b  via the buffer circuit  13   a , and the system control unit  2  controls the operation of the speaker  13   b  by turning ON/OFF a predetermined port of the I/O port  13 . 
     The system bus  12  corresponds to a signal line for exchanging data between the units of the facsimile apparatus  1 . 
       FIG. 3  is a block diagram illustrating a detailed configuration of the operations display unit  7 . 
     In this drawing, numeral keys  7   a  are for inputting numbers and symbols such as ‘#’ and ‘*’. A YES key  7   b  is for making a positive input with respect to content displayed on a display  7   i . A NO key  7   c  is for making a negative input with respect to content displayed on the display  7   i.    
     A STOP key  7   d  is for instructing compulsory halting of an operation of the facsimile apparatus  1 . A START key  7   e  is for instructing starting of an operation of the facsimile apparatus  1 . A FUNCTION key  7   f  is for calling an operations menu by pressing this FUNCTION key  7   f  and making a number input using one or more of the numeral keys  7   a.    
     A group of arrows  7   g  including ‘↑’ (up) key  7   gu , ‘↓’ (down) key  7   gd , ‘→’ (right) key  7   gr , and ‘←’ (left) key  7   gl  is for selecting a specific item from selection items displayed on the display  7   i , and scrolling the display content of the display  7   i  up/down/left/right, for example. 
     A key board unit  7   h  is for making inputs such as a destination address for an e-mail message. 
       FIG. 4  is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the ROM  3 . As is shown in this drawing, the ROM  3  is characterized by including storage areas corresponding to an error number/error content character string storage unit  3   a , an error number/corresponding error group storage unit  3   b , and an error group number/error content character string storage unit  3   c . Details of each of the storage areas are described below in conjunction with descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention. 
       FIG. 5  is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the RAM  4 . As is shown in this drawing, the RAM  4  of the present embodiment is characterized by including storage areas corresponding to an error number/threshold occurrence number setting unit  4   a , an error number/occurrence number storage unit  4   b , an error group number/threshold occurrence number setting unit  4   c , an error group number/occurrence number storage unit  4   d , a storage area  4   e , a storage area  4   f , and an error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g . Details of each of these storage areas are described below in conjunction with specific embodiments of the present invention. 
     In the following, processing procedures of the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  according to a first embodiment of the present invention are described. 
       FIG. 6  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error number/error content character string storage unit  3   a  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the first embodiment. 
     In the storage unit  3   a  as represented by  FIG. 6 , error numbers for identifying various types of errors relating to the network communication operation are associated with corresponding character strings for indicating their respective error contents. 
     For example, error number 01 indicates that a predetermined response for a request to a DNS (domain name system) server cannot be found, and an IP address corresponding to a host name being inquired into cannot be obtained so that connection to a server for mail transmission/reception cannot be established, thus ending in an error of the communication operation. 
     Error number 02 corresponds to an error due to an inability to obtain a predetermined response from a POP server upon accessing the POP server using the POP protocol (POP server cannot be found). 
     Error number 03 corresponds to an error due to an inability to obtain a predetermined response from an SMTP server upon accessing the SMTP server using the SMTP protocol (SMTP server cannot be found). 
     Error number 04 corresponds to an error occurring when login access is rejected in a confirmation procedure with the POP server (Cannot login to POP server). 
     Error number 05 corresponds to an error occurring when a line is disconnected during connection with the POP sever (Line disconnected during connection with POP server). 
     Error number 06 corresponds to an error occurring in a case where a response is received from the SMTP server with respect to an access made to the SMTP sever according to the SMTP protocol but a service cannot be provided due to a busy state of the SMTP server (SMTP server is busy). 
     Error number 07 corresponds to an error occurring when a line is disconnected during connection with the SMTP server (Line disconnected during connection with SMTP server). 
       FIG. 7  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error number/threshold occurrence number setting unit  4   a  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the first embodiment. 
     In the setting unit  4   a  as represented by  FIG. 7 , error numbers corresponding to various types of errors relating to the network communication operations are associated with their respective threshold occurrence numbers. 
     The threshold occurrence number for each of the error numbers may be set in the setting unit  4   a  through an error number/threshold occurrence number setting procedure that may be started by pressing the FUNCTION key  7   f  and inputting a number ‘10’ using the numeral keys  7   a , for example, in which procedure the error numbers are associated with their corresponding threshold occurrence numbers through an interactive input process using the display  7   i . Alternatively, a remote setting scheme via a network may be implemented. 
       FIG. 8  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error number/occurrence number storage unit  4   b  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the first embodiment. 
     In the storage unit  4   b  as represented by  FIG. 8 , error numbers corresponding to various types of errors relating to the network communication operation are associated with their respective successive occurrence numbers. 
       FIG. 9  is a flowchart illustrating the processing procedures according to the first embodiment. 
     As is shown in this flowchart, first, when a power source is switched on or reset, the system control unit  2  of the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  may perform operation confirmation processes on its units, and initialization processes on variables stored in the RAM  4 , for example (process S 101 ). 
     Then, a determination is made as to whether a document is set to the scanner  5  (determination S 102 ). If it is determined that a document is not set (determination S 102  NO), the clock circuit  10  is read to check whether a network connection time, that is, a predetermined connection interval (e.g., 15-minute-interval) has been reached. If the connection time has not been reached (determination S 104  NO), other processes such as monitoring the states of the units of the apparatus (process S 105 ) are performed after which the operation goes back to determination S 102 . 
     In the determination step S 102 , if a document is set (determination S 102  YES), a message calling for an input of a destination address of an e-mail message is displayed on the display  7   i  of the operations display unit  7 , and destination designation processes are successively performed (process S 106 ) for storing character strings that are successively input as destination e-mail addresses (loop established by determination S 107  NO) until the START key  7   e  is pressed instructing the start of a read operation. When the START key is pressed (determination S 107  YES), image information of the document set to the scanner  5  in the determination step S 102  is read by the scanner  5 , and the read information is stored/accumulated in the accumulation memory  9  in association with the e-mail address input in the process step S 106  (process S 108 ), and the operation goes back to the standby process loop including the determination step S 102  NO, the process step S 103 , the determination step S 104  NO, and miscellaneous processes of step S 105 . 
     If it is determined in the determination step S 104  that the connection time has come (determination S 104  YES), a network connection process is realized by the network communication control unit  11  using the SMTP protocol and the POP protocol over the TCP/IP protocol (process S 109 ). If received document data are accumulated in the accumulation memory  9  as a result of the network connection process (determination S 110  YES), the accumulated document data are output and printed by the plotter  6 , after which the operation goes back to the standby process loop. 
     If no received document data are accumulated (determination S 110  NO), the operation goes directly back to the standby process loop. 
       FIG. 10  is a flowchart illustrating an example of specific processing procedures for realizing the network connection process corresponding to process step S 109  of  FIG. 9 . 
     In the network connection process shown in this flowchart, first a network connection confirmation process is performed between the POP server and the SMTP server (process S 201 ), after which the transmission document data accumulated in the process step S 108  of  FIG. 9  are converted into MIME format and transmitted to the destination designated in the process step S 106  (process S 202 ), while received document data stored in the mail box of the present facsimile apparatus  1  that is provided in the POP server are obtained and accumulated in the accumulation memory  9  (process S 203 ). The received document data accumulated in the process step S 203  are output and printed in the process step S 111  of  FIG. 9 . 
     Then, an inquiry is made into an error occurrence status detected by the network communication control unit  11 , for example, in the sequence of network communication operations including the process steps S 201 , S 202 , and S 203 , that is, a verification is made regarding errors corresponding to each of the error numbers (process S 204 ). 
     If it is determined from the process step S 204  that no error has occurred (determination S 205  NO), a process of resetting the occurrence numbers respectively corresponding to the error numbers to 0 (zero) is performed in the storage unit  4   b  (process S 206 ). 
     If it is determined that an error has occurred (determination S 205  YES), an error occurrence responding process is performed on the error number of the detected error and its corresponding error type (process S 207 ). 
     In the process step S 207 , the successive occurrence numbers for the types of errors that have not occurred in the present network communication are reset to 0 (zero) without user notification. 
       FIG. 11  is a flowchart illustrating an example of specific processing procedures for realizing the error occurrence responding process corresponding to the process step S 207  of  FIG. 10 . 
     In this flowchart, first, an error number corresponding to the type of error that has occurred is specified (process S 301 ), and the current time and date information is read from the clock circuit  10  (process S 302 ). Then, the current time and date information is stored in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  in association with the specified error number (process S 303 ). 
       FIG. 12  is a table illustrating storage contents of the storage unit  4   g  in which error occurrence hysteresis data are accumulated each time the process step S 303  of  FIG. 11  is performed in the error occurrence responding process. 
     As is illustrated in this table, in the storage unit  4   g , the error occurrence time and the error number corresponding to an error that has occurred are accumulated for each error occurrence. Thus, by referring to the storage unit  4   g  and the error number/error content character string storage unit  3   a , an error hysteresis report may be easily created and output. 
     For example, the error hysteresis report may be called for by pressing the FUNCTION key  7   f  and inputting the number ‘20’ using the numeral keys  7   a , and the error hysteresis report may be displayed on the display  7   i , printed out by the plotter  6 , and/or transmitted to a predetermined mail address, for example. The error hysteresis report may be provided to the user as reference information for setting in the setting unit  4   a  the threshold occurrence numbers for the respective types of errors. In such case, by storing the time and date information of the error occurrences, a more suitable value may be selected and set as the threshold value so that error notification is not made unless it is necessary or desired. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 11 , after the process step S 303 , the occurrence number corresponding to the error number specified in the process step S 301  is incremented by +1 (process S 304 ). Then, the corresponding threshold occurrence number for the specified error number is specified by referring to the setting unit  4   a  (process S 305 ). 
     Then, a verification is made regarding incremented occurrence number obtained in the process step S 304  having reached the specified threshold occurrence number obtained in the process step S 305  (process S 306 ). 
     If it is determined that the incremented number has not yet reached the specified threshold occurrence number (determination S 307  NO), the corresponding occurrence numbers for the error numbers other than the specified error number are reset to 0 (process S 311 ), and the error occurrence responding process is ended. It is noted that by performing the process step S 311 , the error number corresponding to the present error occurrence is monitored for a successive error occurrence. 
     If it is determined that the incremented number has reached the specified threshold occurrence number (determination S 307  YES), the error number specified in the process step S 301 , and the error content character string in the storage unit  3   a  corresponding to the specified number are output together as an error indication such as a display D 1  shown in  FIG. 13 . 
     In the display D 1  of  FIG. 13 , a message indicating that a network communication error has occurred, an error number (04), and an error content corresponding to the error number (cannot login to POP server) are displayed. 
     The user may know that an error has occurred in the network communication upon seeing this display. In such case, the error that is being displayed has actually occurred successively for a number of times corresponding to the threshold occurrence number set in the setting unit  4   a  (in the case of the error number 04, the occurrence number is 4 times according to  FIG. 7 ). 
     In this way, the present embodiment has been conceived in consideration of the fact that many errors occurring in network communications are easily restored in a short period of time. Taking this into consideration, a user is not notified each time an error occurs, and instead the user is notified when an error occurs successively so that the user is not distracted by frequent notification of irrelevant errors. 
     It is noted that the display D 1  is displayed until the YES key  7   b  is pressed corresponding to an input representing recognition on the user side. Also, in process step S 309 , an alarm sound is turned on for a few seconds at the speaker  13   b . In this way, the user may be able to recognize a substantial error that is successively occurring. 
     Then, the occurrence number stored in the setting unit  4   b  corresponding to the error number that is specified in the process step S 301  is reset to 0 (process S 310 ). In this way, the error indication D 1  that is displayed in the process step S 308  is prevented from being displayed again in a short period of time to distract the user. Then, the process step S 311  as described above is performed after which the error occurrence responding process is ended. 
     In the following, processing procedures performed in the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  according to a second embodiment of the present invention are described. 
       FIG. 14  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error number/corresponding error group storage unit  3   b  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the second embodiment. 
     As is shown in this table, the storage unit  3   b  stores error numbers that are respectively associated with their corresponding error group numbers (error groups represented by the error group numbers). 
     In the present embodiment, error group number 01 represents errors related to mail reception (POP), and error group number 02 represents errors related to mail transmission (SMTP). Also, error group number 00 is provided as a special error group indicating that the error numbers of errors being assigned this error group number 00 do not belong to any other error group and are therefore to be handled as independent errors. 
     In the present embodiment, the error number 01 corresponding to the error ‘DNS server cannot be found’ is handled as an independent error. For the error corresponding to the error number 01, the error occurrence responding process according to the first embodiment is applied. 
       FIG. 15  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error group number/error group content character string storage unit  3   c  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the second embodiment. 
     As is shown in this table, the storage unit  3   c  associates error group numbers respectively corresponding to groups of errors relating to network communication operations with their corresponding error group contents that characterize the respective error groups. 
       FIG. 16  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error group number/threshold occurrence number setting unit  4   c  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the second embodiment. 
     As is shown in this table, the setting unit  4   c  associates error group numbers corresponding to respective groups of errors relating to network communication operations with their corresponding threshold occurrence numbers. 
     The threshold occurrence number for each of the error group numbers may be set in the setting unit  4   a  through an error group number/threshold occurrence number setting procedure that may be started by pressing the FUNCTION key  7   f  and inputting a number ‘30’ using the numeral keys  7   a , for example, in which procedure the error group numbers are associated with their corresponding threshold occurrence numbers through an interactive input process using the display  7   i . Alternatively, a remote setting scheme via a network may be implemented. 
       FIG. 17  is a table illustrating specific storage contents of the error group number/occurrence number storage unit  4   d  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the second embodiment. 
     In the storage unit  4   d  as represented by  FIG. 17 , error group numbers corresponding to groups of errors relating to the network communication operations are associated with their corresponding successive occurrence numbers. 
     It is noted that the processing procedures according to the second embodiment follows the same procedures as those shown in  FIG. 9  describing the first embodiment. However, in the present embodiment, processing procedures for realizing a network connection process as illustrated in  FIG. 18  and an error occurrence responding process as illustrated in  FIG. 19  are performed instead of the processing procedures of  FIGS. 10 and 11  of the first embodiment. 
       FIG. 18  is a flowchart illustrating another example of specific processing procedures for realizing the network connection process corresponding to the process step S 109  of  FIG. 9 . 
     In the network connection process of  FIG. 18 , first, network connection confirmation processes are performed between the POP server and the SMTP server (process S 401 ), after which the transmission document data accumulated in the process step S 108  of  FIG. 9  are converted into MIME format and transmitted to the destination designated in the process step S 106  (process S 402 ), while received document data stored in the mail box for the present facsimile apparatus  1  that is provided in the POP server are obtained and accumulated in the accumulation memory  9  (process S 403 ). The received document data accumulated in the process step S 403  are output and printed in the process step S 111  of  FIG. 9 . 
     Then, an inquiry is made into an error occurrence status detected by the network communication control unit  11 , for example, in the sequence of network communication operations including the process steps S 401 , S 402 , and S 403 , that is, a verification is made concerning an error corresponding to each of the error numbers (process S 404 ). 
     If it is determined from the process step S 404  that no error has occurred (determination S 405  NO), a process of resetting the occurrence numbers corresponding to the error group numbers to 0 (zero) is performed in the storage unit  4   d  (process S 406 ). 
     If it is determined that an error has occurred (determination S 405  YES), an error occurrence responding process is performed on the error number (error type) corresponding to the error occurrence (process S 407 ). 
     In the process step S 407 , the successive occurrence numbers for the error groups that do not correspond to the error that has occurred in the present network communication are reset to 0 (zero) and there is no user notification. 
       FIG. 19  is a flowchart illustrating an example of specific processing procedures for realizing the error occurrence responding process corresponding to the process step S 407  of  FIG. 18 . 
     In the error occurrence responding process of  FIG. 19 , first, an error number corresponding to the type of error that has occurred is specified (process S 501 ), and the current time and date information is read from the clock circuit  10  (process S 502 ). Then, the current time and date information is associated with the specified error number (error type) and stored in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  shown in  FIG. 12  (process S 503 ). 
     As is illustrated in  FIG. 12 , since the error number together with the error occurrence time of an error occurrence are accumulated in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g , an error hysteresis report may be easily created and output by referring to the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  and the error number/error content character string storage unit  3   a.    
     After the process step S 503 , the corresponding error group number for the error number specified in the process step S 501  is specified by referring to the storage unit  3   b  (process S 504 ), and the corresponding occurrence number for the specified error group that is stored in the storage unit  4   d  is incremented by +1 (process S 505 ). Then, the threshold occurrence number corresponding to the specified error group number is specified by referring to the setting unit  4   c  (process S 506 ). 
     Then, a process regarding verification of the incremented occurrence number obtained in the process step S 505  having reached the threshold occurrence number specified in the process step S 506  is carried out (process S 507 ). 
     If it is determined that the incremented occurrence number has not yet reached the specified threshold occurrence number (determination S 508  NO), the occurrence numbers for the error group numbers other than the specified error group number are reset to 0 (process S 512 ), and the present error occurrence responding process is ended. It is noted that by performing the process step S 512 , the error group number corresponding to the present error occurrence is monitored for a successive error occurrence. 
     If it is determined that the incremented occurrence number has reached the specified threshold occurrence number (determination S 508  YES), the error group number specified in the process step S 504 , and the error group content character string in the storage unit  3   a  corresponding to the specified error group number are output together as an error indication such as a display D 2  shown in  FIG. 20 . 
     In the display D 2  of  FIG. 20 , a message indicating that a network communication error has occurred, an error group number (01), and an error content corresponding to the error group number (mail reception (POP) related error) are displayed. 
     The user may know that an error has occurred in the network communication upon seeing this display. In such case, the error that is being displayed has actually occurred successively for a number of times corresponding to the threshold occurrence number set in the setting unit  4   c  (in the case of the error group number 01, the occurrence number is 3 times according to  FIG. 16 ). 
     In this way, the present embodiment has been conceived in consideration of the fact that many errors occurring in network communications are easily restored in a short period of time. Taking this into consideration, a user is not notified each time an error occurs, and instead the user is notified when an error occurs successively so that the user is not distracted by frequent notification of irrelevant errors. Also, by categorically grouping the errors, different settings according to various environmental conditions may be easily realized. 
     It is noted that the display D 2  is displayed until the YES key  7   b  is pressed corresponding to an input representing recognition of the error occurrence on the user side. Also, in process step S 510 , an alarm sound is turned on for a few seconds at the speaker  13   b . In this way, the user may be able to recognize a substantial error that is successively occurring. 
     Then, the occurrence number stored in the setting unit  4   d  corresponding to the error group number that is specified in the process step S 504  is reset to 0 (process S 511 ). In this way, the error indication D 2  that is displayed in the process step S 509  is prevented from being displayed again in a short period of time to distract the user. 
     Then, the process step S 512  of resetting the occurrence numbers corresponding to the other error group numbers are reset to 0 is performed as described above, after which the error occurrence responding process is ended. 
     In the following, processing procedures performed by the facsimile apparatus  1  according to a third embodiment of the present invention are described. 
       FIG. 21  is a diagram illustrating an example of specific storage contents of the storage area  4   e  that is referred to in the processing procedures of the third embodiment. 
     As is shown in the drawing, the storage area  4   e  includes variables ‘E_current’, ‘E_previous’, ‘N_error_new’, and ‘N_set_new’. ‘E_current’ corresponds to a variable that represents an error number of a current error, ‘E_previous’ corresponds to a variable representing an error number of a previous error, ‘N_error_new’ corresponds to a counter variable representing a successive occurrence number of the same error, and ‘N_set_new’ corresponds to a variable representing a successive occurrence threshold number of the same error. 
     The variables ‘E_previous’ and ‘N_error_new’ are respectively reset to 0 by the initialization process performed in the process step S 101  of  FIG. 9 . An error number 0 is set for the variable ‘E_previous’, this error number corresponding to a dummy error number that does not coincide with an actual error number. 
     The variable ‘N_set_new’ representing the successive occurrence threshold number of the same error may be set through a successive error occurrence threshold number setting procedure that is started by pressing the FUNCTION key  7   f  and inputting a number ‘40’, for example, using the numeral keys  7   a  in which procedure a threshold number is set through an interactive input process using the display  7   i . Alternatively, a remote setting scheme realized via a network may be used. 
     It is noted that the processing procedures according to the third embodiment follows the same procedures as those shown in  FIG. 9  describing the first embodiment. However, in the present embodiment, processing procedures for realizing a network connection process as illustrated in  FIG. 22  and an error occurrence responding process as illustrated in  FIG. 23  are performed instead of the processing procedures of  FIGS. 10 and 11  of the first embodiment. 
       FIG. 22  is a flowchart illustrating another example of specific processing procedures for realizing the network connection process corresponding to the process step S 109  of  FIG. 9 . 
     In the network connection process of  FIG. 22 , first, network connection confirmation processes are performed between the POP server and the SMTP server (process S 601 ), after which the transmission document data accumulated in the process step S 108  of  FIG. 9  are converted into MIME format and transmitted to the destination designated in the process step S 106  (process S 602 ), while received document data stored in the mail box for the present facsimile apparatus  1  that is provided in the POP server are obtained and accumulated in the accumulation memory  9  (process S 603 ). The received document data accumulated in the process step S 603  are output and printed in the process step S 111  of  FIG. 9 . 
     Then, an inquiry is made into an error occurrence status detected by the network communication control unit  11 , for example, in the sequence of network communication operations including the process steps S 601 , S 602 , and S 603 , that is, a verification regarding an error corresponding to each of the error numbers is conducted (process S 604 ). 
     If it is determined from the process step S 604  that no error has occurred (determination S 605  NO), the variable ‘N_error_new’ is reset to 0 (process S 606 ), and the variable ‘E_previous’ is reset to 0 (process S 607 ). 
     If it is determined that an error has occurred (determination S 605  YES), an error occurrence responding process is performed for the error number (error type) corresponding to the occurred error (process S 608 ). 
       FIG. 23  is a flowchart illustrating an example of specific processing procedures for realizing the error occurrence responding process corresponding to the process step S 608  of  FIG. 22 . 
     In the error occurrence responding process of  FIG. 23 , first, an error number corresponding to the occurred error is specified (process S 701 ), and the current time and date information is read from the clock circuit  10  (process S 702 ). Then, the current time and date information is associated with the specified error number (error type) to be stored in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  shown in  FIG. 12  (process S 703 ). 
     As is illustrated in  FIG. 12 , since the error number together with the error occurrence date/time of an error occurrence are accumulated in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g , an error hysteresis report may be easily created and output by referring to the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  and the error number/error content character string storage unit  3   a.    
     After the process step S 703 , the error number specified in the process step S 701  is substituted as the variable ‘E_current’ (process S 704 ), and a verification is made regarding the value of the variable ‘E_current’ and the value of the variable ‘E_previous’, that is, the previous error and the current error are referred to for comparison and verification (process S 705 ). 
     If it is determined that the variables do not correspond to the same value (determination S 706  NO), the value of the variable ‘E_current’ is substituted as the value of the variable ‘E_previous’ (process S 707 ), and the variable ‘N_error_new’ is reset to 0 (process S 708 ), after which the error occurrence responding process is ended. 
     If it is determined that the variables correspond to the same value (determination S 706  YES), the counter variable ‘N_error_new’ is incremented (process S 709 ), and a verification is made regarding the incremented variable ‘N_error_new’ and the variable ‘N_set_new’, that is, an occurrence number of a particular error and its corresponding predetermined threshold number are referred to for comparison and verification (process S 710 ). 
     If it is determined that the variables do not correspond to the same value (determination S 711  NO), this signifies that the successive occurrence number of the particular error has not yet reached its set threshold number, and thus, the process is ended. 
     On the other hand, if it is determined that the variables correspond to the same value (determination S 711  YES), an error indication such as a display D 3  shown in  FIG. 24  is displayed. 
     In the display D 3  of  FIG. 24 , a message indicating that a network communication error has occurred, an error number (03), and an error content corresponding to the error number (SMTP server cannot be found) are displayed. This display indicates that a certain error (i.e., error corresponding to error number 03) has successively occurred for the number of times corresponding to the set threshold occurrence number. 
     The user may know that an error has occurred in the network communication upon seeing this display. In such case, the error that is being displayed has actually occurred successively for a number of times corresponding to the threshold occurrence number set as the variable ‘N_set_new’ (e.g., 4 times). 
     In this way, the present embodiment has been conceived in consideration of the fact that many errors occurring in network communications are easily restored in a short period of time. Taking this into consideration, a user is not notified each time an error occurs, and instead the user is notified when an error occurs successively so that the user is not distracted by frequent notification of irrelevant errors. Also, the error notification system may be easily adapted to various environments such as that where a particular error is prone to occur. 
     It is noted that the display D 3  is displayed until the YES key  7   b  is pressed corresponding to an input representing recognition of the error occurrence on the user side. Also, in process step S 713 , an alarm sound is turned on for a few seconds at the speaker  13   b . In this way, the user may be able to recognize a substantial error that is successively occurring. 
     Then, the variable ‘N_error_new’ is reset to 0 (process S 714 ). In this way, the error indication D 3  that is displayed in the process step S 712  is prevented from being displayed again in a short period of time to distract the user. 
     In the following, processing procedures performed in the Internet facsimile apparatus  1  according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention are described. 
       FIG. 25  is a diagram illustrating an example of specific storage contents of the storage area  4   f  that is referred to in the processing procedures according to the fourth embodiment. 
     As is shown in the drawing, the storage area  4   f  stores variables ‘N_error_all’ and ‘N_set_all’. The variable ‘N_error_all’ corresponds to a counter variable representing an occurrence number of errors related to network communication. The variable ‘N_set_all’ corresponds to a variable representing a successive occurrence threshold number of errors relating to network communication. 
     The variable ‘N_error_all’ is reset to 0 by the initialization process performed in the process step S 101  of  FIG. 9 . 
     The variable ‘N_set_all’ representing the successive occurrence threshold number of errors related to network communication may be set through a network communication related error successive occurrence threshold number setting procedure that is started by pressing the FUNCTION key  7   f  and inputting a number ‘50’, for example, using the numeral keys  7   a  of the operations display unit  7  shown in  FIG. 3  in which procedure the threshold number is set through an interactive inputting process using the display  7   i . Alternatively, a remote setting scheme realized via a network may be used. 
     It is noted that the processing procedures according to the fourth embodiment follows the same procedures as those shown in  FIG. 9  describing the first embodiment. However, in the present embodiment, processing procedures for realizing a network connection process as illustrated in  FIG. 26  and an error occurrence responding process as illustrated in  FIG. 27  are performed instead of the processing procedures of  FIGS. 10 and 11  of the first embodiment. 
       FIG. 26  is a flowchart illustrating another example of specific processing procedures for realizing the network connection process corresponding to the process step S 109  of  FIG. 9 . 
     In the network connection process of  FIG. 26 , first, network connection confirmation processes are performed between the POP server and the SMTP server (process S 801 ), after which the transmission document data accumulated in the process step S 108  of  FIG. 9  are converted into MIME format and transmitted to the destination designated in the process step S 106  (process S 802 ), while received document data stored in the mail box for the present facsimile apparatus  1  that is provided in the POP server are obtained and accumulated in the accumulation memory  9  (process S 803 ). The received document data accumulated in the process step S 803  are output and printed in the process step S 111  of  FIG. 9 . 
     Then, an inquiry is made into an error occurrence status detected by the network communication control unit  11 , for example, in the sequence of network communication operations including the process steps S 801 , S 802 , and S 803 , that is, a verification is made regarding an error corresponding to each of the error numbers (process S 804 ). 
     If it is determined from the process step S 804  that no error has occurred (determination S 805  NO), the variable ‘N_error_all’ is reset to 0 (process S 806 ). 
     If it is determined that an error has occurred (determination S 805  YES), an error occurrence responding process is performed for the error number (error type) corresponding to the occurred error (process S 807 ). 
       FIG. 27  is a flowchart illustrating an example of specific processing procedures for realizing the error occurrence responding process corresponding to the process step S 807  of  FIG. 26 . 
     In the error occurrence responding process of  FIG. 27 , first, an error number corresponding to the occurred error is specified (process S 901 ), and the current time and date information is read from the clock circuit  10  (process S 902 ). Then, the current time and date information is associated with the specified error number (error type) to be stored in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  shown in  FIG. 12  (process S 903 ). 
     As is illustrated in  FIG. 12 , since the error number together with the error occurrence date/time of an error occurrence are accumulated in the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g , an error hysteresis report may be easily created and output by referring to the error occurrence hysteresis storage unit  4   g  and the error number/error content character string storage unit  3   a.    
     After the process step S 903 , the variable ‘N_error_all’ is incremented (process S 904 ), and a verification is conducted regoarding the incremented value of the variable ‘N_error_all’ and the variable ‘N_set_all’, that is, the successive occurrence number of arbitrary errors related to network communications and a predetermined threshold number are referred to for comparison and verification (process S 905 ). 
     If it is determined that the variables do not correspond to the same value (determination S 906  NO), this signifies that the successive occurrence number of errors related to network communications has not reached the set threshold number, and the process is hereby ended. 
     On the other hand, if it is determined that the variables correspond to the same value (determination S 906  YES), an error indication such as a display D 4  shown in  FIG. 28  is displayed (process S 907 ). 
     In the display D 4  of  FIG. 28 , a message indicating that a network communication error has occurred is displayed. 
     The user may know that an error has occurred in the network communication upon seeing this display. In such case, the error indication actually indicates that errors have successively occurred for a number of times corresponding to the number set as the variable ‘N_set_all’ (e.g., 4 times). 
     The display D 4  is displayed until the YES key  7   b  is pressed. Also, in process step S 908 , an alarm sound is turned on for a few seconds at the speaker  13   b . In this way, the user may be made aware of a substantial error that is successively occurring. Then, the variable ‘N_error_all’ is reset to 0 in process step S 909 . 
     The present embodiment has been conceived with regard to the fact that many errors occurring in network communications are easily restored in a short period of time. Taking this into consideration, a user is not notified each time an error occurs, and instead the user is notified when an error occurs successively so that the user is not distracted by frequent notification of irrelevant errors. 
     It is noted that in the above descriptions of the preferred embodiments, applications of the present invention to an Internet facsimile apparatus corresponding to one type of network communication terminal apparatus are illustrated. However, the present invention is not limited to such embodiments, and variations and modifications may be made so long as a network is implemented between a communication terminal apparatus and a counterpart apparatus and communication is established through one or more servers. Also, the present invention may be applied generally to any communication terminal apparatus that is under a condition where non-fatal errors occur frequently, the occurrences of which do not necessarily have to be noted each time. 
     The present application is based on and claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-037193 filed on Feb. 14, 2003, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.