Abstract:
Cloning and sequencing certain baculovirus genes encoding polypeptides termed enhancins. The polypeptides are isolated from the occlusion body of certain baculoviruses such as Trichoplusia ni granulosis virus and Pseudaletia unipuncta granulosis virus, Hawaiian strain. The polypeptides have the ability of enhancing the infectivity of baculoviruses and are useful ingredients of pest control compositions.

Description:
Cross-Reference to Related Applications. This is a continuation-in-part application of our application Ser. No. 07/663,560 filed Mar. 4, 1991, which in turn is a continuation-in-part application Ser. No. 07/313,226 filed Feb. 21, 1989, both now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention relates to the cloning and sequencing of novel viral genes from certain baculoviruses for insect control. More particularly, the invention relates to an isolated and cloned DNA from a granulosis virus which comprises an amino acid sequence of the viral gene encoding a polypeptide isolated from occlusion bodies of certain baculoviruses and which polypeptide possesses the biological activity of enhancing baculovirus infectivity. This invention also relates to isolated and purified baculovirus proteins which are characterized by enhancing the infectivity of baculoviruses. Such proteins termed herein as &#34;enhancins&#34; are found within the viral occlusion body, have a disruptive effect on the insect peritrophic membrane (PM) proteins, and/or interact with the midgut epithelium in such a manner as to permit the increased adsorption, penetration and uptake of virus particles by midgut cells with a concomitant increase in host mortality. 
     The publications used to illuminate the background of the invention, and in particular cases, to provide additional details respecting its practice are incorporated herein by reference, and for convenience, are numerically referenced by the following text and respectively grouped in the appended bibliography. Copies of all of the references mentioned in this bibliography are attached to the INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed concurrently herewith. 
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     Present in the protein occlusion bodies (OBs) of some baculoviruses is a unique viral-encoded protein which enhances viral infection of the host insect. This protein is referred to herein as the virus enhancing factor (VEF) and/or as the synergistic factor (SF). Pest control compositions comprising this factor and nuclear polyhedrosis viruses are the subject matter of U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,973,667, 5,011,685. 
     Studies on the mode of action of the VEF isolated from Trichoplusia ni (cabbage looper) granulosis virus (TnGV) showed that the VEF caused rapid degradation of the peritrophic membrane which lines the midgut lumen of lepidopterous larvae. Larval bioassays suggested that this alteration made the peritrophic membrane more permeable to invading baculoviruses resulting in at least a 25-fold increase in larval mortality (1,2). 
     DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART 
     Closely related to, or identical with, the VEF protein is a lipoprotein, originally isolated in crude form from a Hawaiian strain of Pseudaletia unipuncta granulosis virus (PuGV-H), but not cloned or sequenced. It is described by Tanada and co-workers (7, 8, 10) as the &#34;synergistic factor&#34; (SF) and as having a calculated molecular weight between 90K and 160K (6, 24, 35, 42 and 43). The SF was released from the capsule upon dissolution in the midgut, and was the localized to the microvillar surface of the midgut cell membrane (9,37) where it caused an apparent increase in the uptake of enveloped nucleocapsids (36). The binding of SF to the midgut membrane was found to be specific with a calculated equilibrium constant of 1.57×10 -9  M (39). 
     It has been postulated by Hashimoto et al (23) that the two proteins (VEF and SF) are closely related and have similar dual modes-of-action: peritrophic membrane disruption and increased virus uptake. Evidence to support this relationship comes from southern hybridizations of PuGV-H genomic DNA with the VEF gene and western blots of dissolved PuGV-H occlusion bodies with an anti-VEF polyclonal antiserum (23). Tanada determined that this SF in the capsule of PuGV-H increased the larval susceptibility to P. unipuncta nuclear polyhedrosis virus (PuNPV) (8). 
     Since viral enhancing proteins are important at early stages of host infection, it is important to identify and locate the position of the VEF gene and the SF gene on the viral genome. A need, therefore, exists to clone and sequence both the VEF gene of TnGV and the SF gene of PuGV-H. It is an object of this invention to satisfy such a need. Another object is to compare the SF and TnGV VEF genes by showing their extremely high degree of sequence similarity and by demonstrating their similar affects on T. ni PMs and AcMNPV infections in T. ni larvae. Still another object is to show sequence homology and/or serological relateness of the virulence genes and/or enhancing proteins among different baculoviruses. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The above-mentioned objects of the present invention, which will hereinafter become more readily apparent from the following description, have been attained by first isolating and purifying the VEF gene, which comprises a DNA molecule encoding a polypeptide of molecular weight 104 Kd and is found in the granulin fraction of TnGV OBs purified by SEPHACRYL® S-200 SUPERFINE, a general purpose gel filtration medium with a wet bead diameter of 40-105 μm prepared by covalently cross-linking allyl dextran with N,N 1  -methylene bisacrylamide to give a rigid gel with a carefully controlled range of pore sizes, (2.6×34 cm) column, possessing a biological activity and wherein said polypeptide has a total of 901 amino acid residues in the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide. Besides cloning and sequencing the gene encoding the viral enhancing factor (VEF) of TnGv, applicants have also successfully isolated the SF gene and determined its complete nucleotide sequence. 
     The gene encoding for the viral enhancing factor (VEF) of TnGv has been cloned from a lambda gtll expression library, and the complete nucleotide sequence determined. The VEF gene encodes a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 104 Kd which does not share homology to any previously reported proteins. The apparent promotor is located 4 bp upstream of the initiation codon and represents a consensus baculovirus late promoter (ATAAG). This has been confirmed by the identification of VEF mRNA in northern blots of infected larvae at 6 days but not 3 days post infection. Three repeats of the sequence `TTACAAGA` which match the baculovirus late promoter in 4 of 5 nucleotide have been identified between 149 and 192 bp upstream of the initiation codon. While the function of these sequences is unknown, they are not believed to be transcriptionally active since they diverge from the consensus promoter at the invariant `T` position. Using the VEF gene as a probe in southern blots of genomic DNAs, homologous sequences have been identified in PuGV-H and Heliothis armigera GV (HaGV) but not Erinnyis ello GV, (EeGV), Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV) or Trichoplusia ni nuclear polyhedrosis virus (TnSNPV). In addition, SDS-PAGE analysis of dissolved viral occlusion bodies have demonstrated proteins with a molecular weight similar to VEF in PuGV-H and HaGV. 
     As pointed out above, the gene encoding the synergistic factor (SF) of PuGV-H has been cloned by applicants and the complete nucleotide sequence determined. The SF gene encodes a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 104 Kd which shares a 99.1% and 98.2% homology with the nucleotide and amino acid sequence of the viral enhancing factor (VEF) gene of TnGv, respectively. A majority of the differences in the amino acid sequences of the two viruses result from two reciprocal frameshifts which occur between nucleotide +1962 and +1985 of the SF gene. Both enhancing proteins have similar activity in neonate larvae of T. ni (2.4 fold enhancement) and in vitro peritrophic membrane assays. Using a polyclonal antibody directed against TnGV VEF, 17 baculoviruses were screened by western blot hybridization. Cross reactive proteins are found in seven GVs isolated from 4 families of Lepidoptera. These putative enhancing proteins can be separated into 3 groups based on size: HaGV (110 Kd); PuGV-H, Pieris rapae GV (PrGV), Scotogramma trifolii GV (StGV), and TnGV ( 104 Kd); and Cydia pomonella GV (CpGV) and Estigmene acrea GV (80 Kd). The name &#34;enhancin&#34; has been proposed for these enhancing proteins. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     A more complete appreciation of the invention and the attendant advantages thereof will be readily attained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following details of description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, i.e. FIGS. 1-11. 
     FIG. 1. Mapping of the VEF gene of TnGV. a) a Hind III restriction map of the TnGV genome. By convention, the smallest fragment containing all of the granulin gene is assigned to be the first fragment at the left of the linearized map. A fine map of the b) Hind III-M fragment of TnGV and c) fusion gene of lambda F. The striped box indicates the position of the VEF gene while the open box indicates non-coding TnGV sequences inserted into the lambda gtll. The entire insert in lambda F is demarcated by the asterisks. The size of the DNA is indicated by scale, and the restriction sites for BamHI(B), ClaI(C), EcoRI(E), HindIII(H), KpnI(K), and SalI(S) are indicated. 
     FIG. 2. Western bolt analysis of lambda lysogens from lambda F (lane 1 or lambda gtll (lane 2) probed with either anti-VEF polyclonal antibody (lane 1) or an anti-β-galactosidase monoclonal antibody (lane 2). Lysogens were first separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and then electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose. The 153 Kd protein identified by the anti-VEF polyclonal antibody consists of 39 Kd VEF carboxy-terminal and 114 Kd of β-galactosidase. 
     FIG. 3. The nucleotide sequence of the VEF gene from TnGV. The gene has been translated using the single-letter amino acid code. The bolded sequence represents the consensus baculovirus late promoter (5), and the underlined sequences represents 3 repeats of the sequence (TTACAAGA) which matches the promoter in 4 of the 5 base pairs. Double underlined sequences indicate possible glycosylation sites. The DNA sequence of a 3.5 Kb portion of Hind III-M fragment was determined by dideoxy chain termination method using bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase. Sequence data were compiled and analyzed using the software program of PCGENE. In this sequence, A stands for deoxyadenyl, G for deoxyguanyl, C deoxycytidyl, and T is thymidyl. The amino acids encoded by the above DNA are designated below the appropriate nucleotide triplet. Accordingly, M is methionine; K is lysine, P is proline; E is glutamate, L is leucine; T is threonine; A is alanine; S is serine; V is valine; F is phenylalanine; I is isoleucine; G is glycine; D is aspartic acid; Q is glutamine; R is arginine; C is cysteine; W is tryptophan; N is asparagine; H is histidine; and Y is tyrosine. 
     FIG. 4. Northern blot of total RNA isolated from infected larvae. Total RNA was isolated from T. ni larvae at 3 and 6 days post inoculation (PI) with TnGV. Ten micrograms of RNA were electrophoresed in a denaturing 1.5% agarose and northern blotted following the methods of Dwyer and Granados (17). Blots were probed with the internal KpnI fragment of TnGV-VEF gene under high stringency conditions. No hybridization was found to RNA isolated at 3 days PI. However, 2 RNA species of 2.7 and 3.3 Kbp hybridized at 6 days PI. This indicated that the VEF gene was probably a late gene. 
     FIG. 5a and FIG. 5b. Southern hybridization and SDS-PAGE analysis of TnGV and 5 other baculoviruses. Item a of FIG. 5a) Genomic baculovirus was digested with Hind III and electrophoresed on a 0.75% agarose gel. The DNA was transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with the internal KpNI fragment of TnGV-VEF and washed under high stringency conditions. Homologous sequences were identified in PuGV-H, and HaGV. Item b of FIG. 5b) Occlusion bodies are dissolved in 0.05M NaCO pH 10.5 for 15 minutes at room temperature and the nucleocapsids pelleted by centrifugation at 14,000×g. The supernatants were removed and electrophoresed in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with COOMASSIE blue. 
     FIG. 6. A comparison of the nucleotide sequence for the PuGV-H SF and TnGV VEF genes. Hyphens denote nucleotide identical to the PuGV-H sequence. The consensus baculovirus late promoters (30) have been underscored, the putative start codon has been bolded, and the stop codon overscored. Two frameshift mutations have occurred at +1962 and +1985. The homology between the two genes is 99.1%. The second open reading frame starts at +2755 nt. The stop codon for this gene has not been found. 
     FIG. 7. A comparison of the amino acid sequence for the PuGV-H SF and TnGV VEF proteins. Hyphens denote nucleotide identical to the PuGV-H sequence. The identity between the two proteins is 98.2%. 
     FIG. 8. SDS-PAGE analysis of purified SF and VEF. Three micrograms of VEF or SF was added to an equal volume of 2× SDS-PAGE loading buffer (0.125M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol). The sample were electrophoresed for 4.5 hours at 30 mAmps through a 7% separating gel (10 cm×12 cm×1.5 mm), and stained with COOMASSIE blue R-250 following standard protocols. SF (lane 1) migrated at 106K while VEF (lane 2) migrated at 101K. 
     FIG. 9. SDS-PAGE analysis of in vitro digest of peritrophic membranes. Individual peritrophic membranes (PM) were dissected from the last instar (a) Trichoplusia ni and (b) Pseudaletia unipuncta larvae. Peritrophic membranes were resuspended in 50 μl of 0.1M Na 2  CO 3  pH 10.5 containing (a) 5 μg or (b) 10 μg of VEF (lane 2) or SF (lane 3), and incubated at 28° C. for 60 min. The reactions were stopped by washing the PMs in deionized water and resuspending in SDS-PAGE loading buffer (0.062M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 5%--mercaptoethanol). Controls (ln 1) consisted of PMs treated in the same manner but without enhancing protein. Samples were electrophoresed through at 10% separating gel and silver stained. SF and VEF digested the same protein in both the T. ni and P. unipuncta PMs. Multiple degradation products are evident in both the SF (ln 3) and VEF (ln 2) lanes. 
     FIG. 10. SDS-PAGE and Western bolt analysis of nine baculoviruses. Viral occlusion bodies were dissolved in DAS (0.1M Na 2  CO 3 , 0.01M EDTA, 0.17M NaCl, pH 10.9) for 15 min at room temperature. An equal volume of 2× SDS-PAGE loading buffer (0.125M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol was added and the samples electrophoresed through a 10% separating gel. The gels were either (a) stained with COOMASSIE blue (b) or used in Western blots. Proteins cross-reacting with an anti-VEF/TrpE (23) antiserum were found in CpGV (lane 1, 80 Kd), EaGV (Lane 2, 80 Kd), HaGV (lane 4, 110 Kd), PrGV (lane 7, 101 Kd) and PuGV-H (lane 8, 106 Kd). EeGV (lane 3), PbGV (lane 5), PiGV (lane 6), PuGV-O (lane 9) did not cross-react with the antiserum. 
     FIG. 11. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of nine baculoviruses. Viral occlusion bodies were dissolved in DAS (0.1M Na 2  CO 3 , 0.01M EDTA, 0.17M NaCl, pH 10.9) for 15 min at room temperature. An equal volume of 2× SDS-PAGE loading buffer (0.125M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol) was added and the samples electrophoresed through a 10% separating gel. The gels were either (a) stained with COOMASSIE blue (b) or used in Western blots. Proteins cross-reacting with an anti-VEF/TrpE (23) antiserum were found in StGV (lane 11, 106 Kd), and TnGV (lane 12, 104 Kd). SfGV (lane 10), AcMNPV (lane 13), AgMNPV (lane 14), CfNPV (lane 15), HzSNPV-ELCAR (lane 16), and TnSNPV (lane 17), did not cross-react with the antiserum. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     Enhancing Protein Purification 
     The TnGV VEF and PuGV-H SF were isolated according to the methods of Gallo et al. (21) with the following modifications. SEPHACRYL® and now replaced by SEPHARYL® S-300HR and the initial concentration of viral occlusion bodies was reduced from 1.7×10 12  to 1.0×10 12  per ml. 
     Purified enhancing factor containing approximately 3 mg of protein was added to an equal volume of 2× sample buffer (2×=0.125M TRIS HCl [Tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane]. pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol), heated in a boiling water bath for 3 min., and separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) according to the methods of Laemmli (29). Electrophoresis was carried out at 30m Amps for 4.5 hr in a 7% separating gel (10 cm×12 cm×1.5 mm), and stained with COOMASSIE Blue R-250 following standard protocols. 
     Cloning and Sequencing of Enhancing Genes 
     The VEF present in granulin fraction of TnGV OBs was purified in the following manner: 
     1.7×10 12  TnGV OBs were dissolved in 1 ml 0.05M Na 2  CO 3  for 15 min. at room temperature, and layered on a 20% sucrose cushion in H 2  O and centrifuged for 45 min. at 126,000 g at 4° C. The granulin fraction remained on top of the sucrose cushion and was collected. After an incubation of 5 hrs at 28° C., the granulin fraction was applied onto a Sephacryl-S-200 column (2.6×34 cm) and eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 0.1M NaCl at 1.5 ml/min, and the absorption of the eluate measured at 280 nm. The first peak containing VEF protein was poled and used for experiment. 
     A cloning and expression vector, lambda gtll, was used for construction of genomic library of TnGV and for isolation of the VEF gene (3). Antibodies were raised against Sephacryl-column purified VEF from granulin fraction after alkali solubilization of OBs (1) and were used for immunoblotting to screen for positive clones. Through several steps of screening approximately 6000 plaques, a clone was selected containing the longest viral-VEF DNA insert. Southern blot hybridization analysis of TnGV DNA Hind III digests, probed with the VEF clone insert, revealed that the VEF gene existed on the Hind III-M fragment. Western blot analysis of the fusion protein expressed in lysogenic E. coli (Y1089 strain) transfected with VEF clone had a molecular weight of 153 kD (FIG. 2). This suggested a fusion protein gene consisting of 39 Kd of the VEF carboxy terminal end and the 114 Kd beta-gal gene (FIGS. 1c, 2). Since the VEF has a size of 104 Kd, the position of the VEF gene on a fine map of the Hind III-M fragment was predicted and a 3.5 kbp DNA portion was sequenced (Item b of FIG. 1). 
     Sequence analysis showed an open reading frame of 2,703 bp DNA corresponding to the size of the VEF polypeptide at the predicted location of the VEF gene (FIG. 3). The deduced size of the polypeptide was 104,300 daltons and consisted of 901 amino acid residues. There are no sites for lipophilic modification. To determine the presence of the VEF gene among several isolates of baculovirus a 1.5 kbp portion of the VEF gene was probed onto a Southern blot of different virus DNA fragments digested with Hind III restriction enzyme under high stringency condition (12). The result showed that two granulosis virus DNAs, isolated from PuGV-H and HaGV, contained a sequence homologous to the TnGV VEF gene probe (FIG. 5a). DNA isolated from EeGV did not contain sequences homologous to the VEF gene probe. The restriction enzyme digestion pattern of DNA from TnGV, GVH, and HaGV were very similar, whereas EeGV exhibited a very distinct DNA profile. The probe did not hybridize with DNAs from two nuclear polyhedrosis viruses (FIG. 5a). Temporal gene expression of the VEF gene was examined by Northern blot analysis of total RNA from TnGV-infected T. ni larvae at 3 and 6 days p.i. A probe with a size of 1.5 Kb KpnI-V fragment, a part of the VEF gene, showed no hybridization with RNAs at 3 days p.i. but showed strong hybridization with two RNA species with sizes of 2.7 Kb and 3.3 Kb at 6 days p.i. (FIG. 4). The TnGV-VEF present in the granulin fraction of alkaline dissolved OBs was resolved as a 104 Kd protein on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel. To determine the presence of high molecular weight polypeptides in granulin or polyhedrin fractions from six baculoviruses, these virus samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (FIG. 5b). In the granulin fractions from TnGV, GVH and HaGV, polypeptides with a size of 104 Kd, 106 Kd, and a complex of 110 Kd and 94 Kd were detected, respectively. The single high molecular weight polypeptide (106 Kd) from GVH appears to migrate on SDS-PAGE similar to the 104 Kd protein from TnGV (FIG. 5b and Y. Tanada, personal communication). The assignment of a VEF function to either the 94 or 110 kDa polypeptides from HaGV is not clear at this time. No polypeptides with a size of approximately 100 kDa were present in EeGV, TnSNPV, and AcMNPV. Three of the GVs examined, TnGV, GVH, and HaGV all infect the noctuid species T. ni, whereas EeGV grows only in the sphyngid species, E. ello. 
     KpnI and SalI subclones of the EcoRI-I fragment of PuGV-H, which contains the entire SF gene, were cloned into the KpnI and SalI sites of pUC 19 (40). This was followed by nested deletions from both ends of the subcloned DNA using the Exo/mung deletion kit (Stratagene). The nucleotide sequence was determined using the dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al. (32) as modified for use with the Sequenase sequencing kit (U.S. Biochemicals). Sequencing data were compiled and analyzed using the PCGENE (Intelligenetics) software package. 
     Neonate bioassays employing 3-5 hr old larvae were conducted according to the methods of Hughes et al. (28) except that the neonates were not preselected for vigor and the droplets were applied by means of a syringe equipped with a blunt needle (26). The inoculum contained 1×10 5  OB/ml of AcMNPV with 1.0 or 0.5 mg/ml of either TnGV VEF or PuGV-H SF and all larvae were assumed to have imbibed 10 nl of inoculum (27). After ingestion of the inoculum, larvae were transferred with a fine paintbrush into individual 35 ml cups containing high wheat germ diet. Controls consisted of neonates that imbibed either virus without any enhancing factor or water with food coloring. The test was conducted 2 times with 30 larvae/treatment in each test group. 
     In Vitro Peritrophic Membrane Assay 
     PM were dissected from last instar T. ni. and P. unipuncta larvae, rinsed in deionized water to remove diet residue, and stored at -80° C. Thawed PMs were resuspended in 50 ml of digestion buffer (0.1M Na 2  CO 3 , pH 10.5) containing either 5 μg or 10 μg of SF or VEF. After incubation at 28° C. for 1 hr, the PMs were washed in water, placed in 1× SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. Controls consisted of PMs treated in the same manner but without any enhancing factor. The protein composition of the treated and control PMs were analyzed by discontinuous SDS-PAGE (79) on a Mini-PROTEAN II (BioRad) at 200 volts for 35 min with a 10% separating gel. Gels were stained using the BioRad Silver Staining Kit according to he manufacturer&#39;s instructions. 
     Western Blots 
     Viral occlusion bodies were first dissolved in dilute alkali solution (0.1M Na 2  CO 3 , 0.01M EDTA, 0.17M NaCl, pH 10.9) for 15 minutes at room temperature. An equal volume of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added and the mixture heated in a boiling water bath for 7 minutes. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE as described above. The proteins were then electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose paper following the methods of Towbin et al (38). Western blots were analyzed using an anti-VEF/TrpE polyclonal antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 (23). Bands were visualized using an alkaline phosphatase conjugated secondary antibody (19). 
     SUMMARY OF RESULTS 
     For cloning and sequence analysis of VEF, two positive clones were identified from the approximately 6000 plaques screened with a α-VEF polyclonal antiserum. Both clones had identical inserts of 2.8 Kb mapped to the Hind III-M fragment of the TnGV genome (92.2 to 95.8 map units; FIG. 1a). Other TnGV fragments hybridizing to the clones included the 6.7 Kb EcoRI-K and the BamHI-FG doublet. Detailed maps of both TnGV Hind III-M and the insert DNA were generated using several restriction enzymes (FIGS. 1b,c). 
     Western blot analysis using both an anti-VEF polyclonal antisera and an anti-β-galactosidase monoclonal antibody (Promega, Madison, Wis.) demonstrated that the fusion protein generated by lambda-F had a molecular weight of 153 Kd which presumably consisted of 39 Kd of VEF carboxy-terminal and 114 Kd of β-galactosidase protein (FIG. 2). The VEF gene was tentatively positioned on the Hind III-M fragment using this information. 
     Sequence analysis of approximately 3.5 Kbp of Hind III-M DNA revealed an open reading frame of 2703 bp (901 amino acids) encoding a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 104.3 Kda (FIG. 3). The predicted protein contains 12 candidate sites for N-linked glycosylation (ASN/X/SER or Thr) and no sites predicted for lipophilic modification (LYS/X/X/CYS/X/X/ASN). A consensus baculovirus late promoter (ATAAG) occurred at -4 nt and a probable polyadenylation signal (AATAA) was found 2 nt downstream of the VEF ORF. The upstream region of the VEF gene contained three perfect repeats of the sequence TTACAAGA between -192 and -149 nt of the translation start site. Curiously, these repeats were similar to the baculovirus consensus sequence for hyperexpression described by Rohrman (5). However, in all three sequences, mismatches occurred at the invariable &#34;T&#34; of the &#34;ATAAG&#34; core late promoter motif. Changes at this position have been shown to eliminate transcriptional initiation (5). A comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of the VEF with both the NBRF and Swiss-Prot protein data bases did not reveal any similarity to known proteins. 
     The occurrence of the late core promoter sequence at -4 bp indicated that VEF should be expressed late in infections. This was demonstrated by isolating RNA from infected larvae at several times (3 days and 6 days) PI. Using a restriction fragment from within the VEF open reading frame (ORF) as a probe, strong hybridization was shown to 2 RNA species (2.7 and 3.3 Kb) at 6 days PI but none at 3 days PI (FIG. 4). The transcript size of 2.7 Kb agreed with the predicted transcription start and stop signals adjacent to the open reading frame. 
     For SF sequence analysis, approximately 3300 bp within the EcoRI-I fragment of PuGV-H was sequenced, in both directions, revealing a 2703 bp open reading frame (ORF; FIG. 6) with a calculated molecular weight of the protein of 104 Kd. A consensus baculovirus late promoter motif (ATAAG; Ooi et al.) (30) was located at -8 to -4 nts relative to the ORF. A comparison of both the nucleotide and amino acid sequence with that of the VEF gene from TnGV revealed a 99.1% (FIG. 6) and 98.2% (FIG. 7) homology respectively. The only significant difference in homology between PuGV-H SF and TnGV VEF genes occurs between nucleotide +1962 and +1985. Two reciprocal frameshifts in the PuGV-H sequence have caused a 7 amino acid gap which shares no homology to the TnGV VEF protein sequence. Homology of the PuGV-H gene with the TnGV VEF gene was greater than 95% for 300 bp upstream of the gene. After this point, the homology decreases to 17.7%. From data analyzed thus far, the PuGV-H and TnGV sequence homology is greater than 99% for 155 nts downstream of the genes. A consensus baculovirus late promoter motif is located 35 nt upstream of the stop codon of the VEF and SF gene sequences, and 78 nt upstream of a potential ORF. This possible second ORF is located 43 nt downstream of the SF and VEF ORFs. 
     The enhancing protein from PuGV-H was purified from capsules in the same manner as the TnGV VEF. Approximately 330 mg of purified protein was isolated from 1.0×10 12  OBs. Based on SDS-PAGE analysis, purified SF had a calculated molecular weight of 106 Kd (FIG. 8). While this was in good agreement with the predicted molecular weight of 104 Kd from other protein sequence analysis there is a repeatable difference in the migration pattern when compared to the TnGV VEF protein (FIG. 8). 
     The homology between the VEF and SF proteins suggested that the ability to enhance baculovirus infections should also be similar. This was tested by a neonate larval bioassay (Table 1) and an in vitro PM assay (FIG. 9). Enhancement of AcMNPV infections of T. ni larvae occurred with the VEF and SF proteins. The 2.4 fold enhancement of 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________Effect of PuGV-H and TnGV Enhancing Factors onAcMNPV Infections of Tricloplusia ni Neonate Larvae*Enhancing Factor    PercentSource         ng/larva Mortality______________________________________PuGV-H         10       95PuGV-H          5       95TnGV           10       95           0       40______________________________________ *All larvae were infected with 1 OB.  This represents the average of two bioassays with 30 larvae per treatment. Nonvirus control had no mortality. 
    
     infections by SF was identical to that seen in the VEF assays. In the in vitro PM assay, SF and VEF digested the same proteins in both the T. ni and P. unipuncta PMs. For the T. ni PM, 3 proteins of molecular weight 236.6 Kd, 111.5 Kd, and 98.2 Kd present in the control lanes are absent in the SF and VEF treatment lanes (FIG. 9a). Protein bands found only in the treatment lanes include a predominant group of bands occurring between 71.6K and 58.8K and 2 lower molecular weight proteins of 31.2K and 23.3K (FIG. 9a). In P. unipuncta, 7 proteins are absent in the treatment lanes as compared to the control (FIG. 9b, lane 1). The molecular weight of the digested bands are 210.5 Kd, 184.3 Kd, 171.1 Kd, 125.7 Kd, 111.5 Kd, 36.4 Kd, and 32.0 Kd. While there are 4 new protein bands of molecular weight 182.4 Kd, 121.3 Kd, 32.4 Kd, and 24.6 Kd common to both SF and VEF treatments, 4 unique proteins are also evident: 85.5K in VEF and 91.8K, 82.7K, and 80.0K in the SF treatment (FIG. 9b, lanes 2 and 3). 
     In order to ascertain the prevalence of the VEF gene within the Baculoviruses, 17 different baculoviruses (12 GVs and 5 NPVs) have been screened for VEF homologs using a polyclonal antisera specific for the TnGV VEF protein (FIGS. 10 and 11). Cross-reactive proteins were found in 7 GVs: Cydia pomonella GV (CgGV), Estigmene acrea GV (EaGV), HaGV, PrGV, PUGV, and StGV. This represents GVs which were isolated from 4 different families of Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Noctuidae, Pieridae, and Tortricidae. EeGV, PuGV Oregon strain, Plodia interpunctella GV, Pieris brassicae GV, and Spodoptera frugiperda GV did not have any cross-reactive proteins. None of the NPVs (AcMNPV, Anticarsia gemmatalis MNPV, Choristoneura fumiferana NPV, Helicoverpa zea SNPV, and TnSNPV) reacted with the antisera. 
     The identified VEF cross-reactive proteins could be subdivided based on the molecular weight of the proteins. PrGV, PuGV-H, StGV, and TnGV had the most common protein size of approximately 104 Kd. HaGV had a slightly higher molecular weight (110 Kd) while CpGV and EaGV had a significantly lower molecular weight of approximately 80 Kd. 
     The cloning and sequencing of the SF gene from PuGV-H represents the second baculovirus enhancing factor to be sequenced to date. The high degree of homology between the PuGV-H and TnGV genes is unusual and indicates that there may be a strong selective pressure on the gene. Another possible explanation is that PuGV-H may be a variant of TnGV: however, this seems unlikely since the degree of homology decreases to 17.6% 300 bps upstream of the gene. In addition, there are significant differences in the restriction enzyme patterns of the two viral genomes (23). The identification of a second open reading frame may explain the high degree of homology (&gt;99%) observed downstream of the two genes. The effect of this downstream gene on the expression of VEF or SF is unknown. On SDS-PAGE, the SF and VEF proteins show a consistent difference in mobility. Since these proteins have near identical molecular weights, it is possible that the two proteins may be processed or modified differently in the two hosts. 
     The results from both the neonate and in vitro PM assays demonstrate that the two proteins are very similar in activity. The observed differences in the digestion patterns of the PM proteins from both T. ni and P. unipuncta are probably due to quantitative differences in the amounts of the two enzymes. Evidence for this comes from the T. ni digests and the periodicity of the protein bands between 71.6 Kd and 58.8 Kd. The same bands are present in both the SF and VEF digests; however, the intensity of the bands differ. In the VEF digest (FIG. 9a, lane 2) the higher molecular weight bands predominate while in the SF digest (FIG. 9a), lane 3) the opposite is true. The data suggests a possible endoproteolytic type of cleavage in which the digestion in the SF reaction has proceeded further than in the VEF reaction. 
     Five baculoviruses were originally tested for the presence of VEF-homologous proteins by both DNA hybridization and SDS-PAGE analysis of dissolved occlusion bodies (FIGS. 4A and B). Hind III genomic digest of the 5 baculovirus DNAs under low stringency conditions, using a restriction fragment with the VEF ORF as a probe, showed homology between TnGV and 2 other granulosis viruses (PuGV-H and HaGV). No apparent homology was seen to either EeGV, TnSNPV, or AcMNPV (FIG. 5A). 
     To date, a total of 8 GVs have been reported to have enhancing proteins. Seven of the proteins cross-react with a polyclonal antiserum specific for the VEF from TnGV. The other enhancing factor, which is found in Xestia c-nigrum (23), has not been tested with the antiserum. Enhancing proteins have now been identified in baculoviruses isolated from four families of Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Noctuidae, Pieridae, and Tortricidae. Previously, enhancing factors had only been identified in GVs infecting Noctuidae. This data lends credibility to the hypothesis that these enhancing proteins are common in GVs and are important baculovirus proteins which assist in the initial stages (PM penetration and virion adsorption) of larval infections. Applicants&#39; inability to identify cross-reacting proteins in the NPVs suggests that while these viruses may have proteins which are functionally related to the GV enhancing factors (1), they are unrelated in primary amino acid sequence. 
     The identified baculovirus enhancing proteins can be tentatively separated into 3 distinct groups based on molecular weight: 104 Kd, 110 Kd, and 80 Kd. All of the research has concentrated on 2 enhancing factors from the same group, PuGV-H and TnGV (104 Kd). 
     The absence of a protein in PuGV-O which does not cross-react to the VEF antiserum, confirms earlier reports indicating that PuGV-O does not contain an enhancing factor (6) and that differences exist in the capsular components of PuGV-H and PuGV-O (34,41). 
     It is important to note that the baculoviruses are just one of many insect pathogenic organisms that have evolved mechanisms, both behavioral and structural, to circumvent the PM (25) and Babesia microti, an intraerythrocytic piroplasm of the tick Ixodes dammini, has developed a complex &#34;arrowhead&#34; structure which secretes a series of digestive enzymes to enable passage through the PM (31). 
     The VEF and SF genes of the present invention can be used in engineering new viral pesticides with enhanced efficacy. For example, it can be used alone as biopesticide or in combination with known biological insecticides such as BT or with synthetic chemical insecticides. The gene product of this invention can also be used to produce VEF or SF in any microbial production system, e.g. E. coli, Bacillus or Streptococcus. It can be introduced into a variety of hosts such as plants for protection against insects or microbes as biologically active agents. 
     The genes of this invention can be engineered to be expressed in transgenic plants and as insects feed on these plants, they would ingest a constant dose of the factor. While the exact effect of this on the insect is undetermined, it can be hypothesized that prolonged disruption of the peritrophic membrane (PM) may allow opportunistic microbes to infect and kill the insects. It was recently found that the viral factor increases the efficiency of Bt delta endotoxin by removing a major mechanical barrier--the PM. 
     The genes of the present invention have been found to play a significant role as a determinant of virulence at the initial stage of infection in insect hosts. Knowledge gained in cloning and sequencing the viral gene should prove useful in helping to unravel the mechanism(s) of enhanced virus infection by enhancement factors present within the occlusion body matrix. 
     Notwithstanding that reference has been made to particular preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the present invention is not to be construed as limited as such, but rather to the lawful scope of the appended claims. In other words, the subject invention includes not only the specific nucleotide sequences depicted herein, but also all equivalent nucleotide sequences coding for molecules with substantially the same biological activity of enhancing the infectivity of baculoviruses. The term &#34;equivalent&#34; is being used in ordinary patent usage here as denoting a nucleotide sequence which performs substantially as the nucleotide sequence identified herein to produce molecules with substantially the same biological activity in essentially the same kind of hosts. Within this definition are subfragments which have biological activity of enhancing the infectivity of baculoviruses. 
     Inasmuch as the protein, i.e., the gene product, of the present invention has been defined by means of deductive amino acid sequencing, c.f. FIG. 3, it is to be understood that for this particular protein, embraced herein, natural allelic variations exist and occur from individual to individual. These variations may be demonstrated by (an) amino acid difference(s) in the overall sequence or by deletions, substitutions, insertions, inversions or additions of (an) amino acid(s) in said sequence. All such allelic variations are included within the scope of the present invention. 
     BIBLIOGRAPHY 
     1. Derksen, A. G. S. and Granados, R. R. Virology 167: 242-250 (1988). 
     2. Peters, W. and Wiese, B. J. Insect Physio. 32:43-49 (1986). 
     3. Snyder, M., Sweatser, D., Young, R. A. and Davis, R. W. Meth. Enzym. 154:107-128 (1985). 
     4. Vlak, J. M. and Smith, G. E. J. Virol. 41:1118-1121 (1982). 
     5. Rohrmann, G. F. J. Gen. Virol. 67:1499-1513 (1986). 
     6. Tanada, Y. and Hukuhara, T. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 17:116-126 (1971). 
     7. Tanada, Y. and Hara, S. Nature 254: 328-329 (1975). 
     8. Tanada, Y. J. Insect Pathol. 1:215-231 (1959). 
     9. Tanada, Y. Inoue, H., Hess, R. T. , and Omi, E. M. J. Inverebr. Pathol. 35:249-255 (1980). 
     10. Tanada, Y. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 45:125-138 (1985). 
     11. Yamamoto, T., Kita, H. and Tanada, Y. J. Gen. Virol. 45:371-381 (1979). 
     12. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F. and Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1982). 
     13. Hamm, J. J. and Paschke, J. D. J. Insect Pathol. 5:187-197 (1963). 
     14. Whitlock, V. H. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 23: 70-75 (1974). 
     15. Granados, R. R. and Williams, K. A. The Biology of Baculoviruses, CRC Press, Fl. Vol I:89-108 (1986). 
     16. Miller, L. K. The Biology of Baculoviruses, CRC Press, Fl. Vol I:217-238 (1986). 
     17. Dwyer, K. G. &amp; Granados, R. R. J. Virol. 62: 1535-1542 (1988). 
     18. Jacques R. P. Can. Entomol. 120:575-580 (1988). 
     19. Sears, M. K. et al. J. Econ. Entomology 76:368-374 (April 1983). 
     20. Blake, M. S., Johnston, K. H., Russel-Jones, G. J. &amp; Gotschlich, E. C. Analyical Biochemistry 136, 175-179  (1984). 
     21. Gallo, L. G., Corsaro, B. G., Hughes, P. R. &amp; Granados, R. R. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 58:203-210 (1991). 
     22. Goto, C. Applied Entomology and Zoology 25, 135-137 (1990). 
     23. Hashimoto, Y., Corsaro, B. G. &amp; Granados, R. R. Journal of General Virology 72, 2645-2651 (1991). 
     24. Hara, S., Tanada, Y. &amp; Omi, E. M. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 27, 115-124 (1976). 
     25. Huber, M., Cabib, E. &amp; Miller, L. H. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 88,2807-2810 (1991). 
     26. Hughes, P. R. &amp; Wood, H. A. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 37, 154-159 (1981). 
     27. Hughes, P. R., Wood, H. A., Burand, J. P. &amp; Granados, R. R. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 43, 343-350 (1984). 
     28. Hughes, P. R., van Beek, N. A. M. &amp; Wood, H. A. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 48, 187-192 (1986). 
     29. Laemmli, U. K. Nature London 227,680-685 (1970). 
     30. Ooi, B. G., Rankin, C., &amp; Miller, L. K. Journal of Molecular Biology 210,721-736 (1989). 
     31. Rudzinska, M. A., Spielman, A., Lewngrub, S., Piesman, J. &amp; Karakshian, S. Cell and Tissue Research 221, 471-481 (1982). 
     32. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. &amp; Coalson, A. R. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 74, 5463-5467 (1977). 
     33. Tanada, Y. &amp; Hukuhara, T. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 12, 262-268 (1968). 
     34. Tanada, Y. &amp; Watanabe, H. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 18, 307-312 (1971). 
     35. Tanada, Y., Himeno, M. &amp; Omi, E. M. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 21, 31-40 (1973). 
     36. Tanada, Y., Hess, R. T. &amp; Omi, E. M. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 26, 99-104 (1975). 
     37. Tanada, Y., Hess, R. T., Omi, E. M. &amp; Yamamoto, T. Microbios 37, 87-93 (1983). 
     38. Towbin, H., Staehelin, R. &amp; Gordon, J. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 76, 4350-4354  (1979). 
     39. Uchima, K., Harvey, J. P., Omi, E. M. &amp; Tanada, Y. A. Insect Biochemistry 18, 645-650 (1988). 
     40. Vieira, J. &amp; J. Messing. Gene 19,259-286 (1982). 
     41. Yamamoto, T. &amp; Tanada, Y. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 32, 158-170 (1978). 
     42. Yamamoto, T. &amp; Tanada. Y. Virology 107, 434-440 (1980). 
     43. Zhu, Y., Hukuhara, T. &amp; Tamura, K. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 54, 49-56 (1989). 
     
         __________________________________________________________________________SEQUENCE LISTING(1) GENERAL INFORMATION:(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 2(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 3556 basepairs(B) TYPE: Nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: Doublestranded(D) TOPOLOGY: Circular(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: Genomic DNA(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: No (iv) ANTI-SENSE: No(v) FRAGMENT TYPE: N/A(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:(A) ORGANISM: Trichoplusia ni granulosis virus(vii) IMMEDIATE SOURCE:(A) LIBRARY: Lambda GT11(B) CLONE: HindIII-M(viii) POSITION IN GENOME:(A) CHROMOSOME/SEGMENT: N/A(B) MAP POSITION: 92.2 - 94.2(C) UNITS: genome percent(ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Mature protein(B) LOCATION: 435 bp to 3140 bp(C) IDENTIFICATION METHOD: Experimentally(D) OTHER INFORMATION: Degrades special PeritrophicMembrane proteins. Binds to midgut brush border(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: Baculovirus very latepromoter(B) LOCATION: 427 to 432 bp(C) IDENTIFICATION METHOD: Experimentally (D) OTHER INFORMATION: N/A(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: Possible glycosylation sites(B) LOCATION: Site 1 65 to 67 amino acidsSite 2 265 to 267 amino acidsSite 3 306 to 308 amino acidsSite 4 339 to 341 amino acidsSite 5 349 to 351 amino acidsSite 6 540 to 542 amino acids Site 7 594 to 596 amino acidsSite 8 595 to 597 amino acidsSite 9 621 to 623 amino acidsSite 10 642 to 644 amino acidsSite 11 683 to 685 amino acidsSite 12 698 to 700 amino acids(C) IDENTIFICATION METHOD: Experimentally(D) OTHER INFORMATION: Not known(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQUENCE ID NO: 1:CAGCGCGAAAACGGTTGGTGCCAATTACTGGTATATTGCTATGATCGAGTCACGTCATAA60GGGTCGATTCGCGACGGTCTCCCACGTGGCCTTCCATTGAGGTTTACGTGTTTGTGTATG120CGTGCGAGTGTTTTTATAACCCAAAAACTCAGCCACAC CGTGTCCACCGTACATATACTT180GTCCTTTTCCAATTCCACAATCCAAATTTCCGCAGAAACTCCTCCAATGTTGCACGATTT240TTTTACAAGAGTCATTTTGCACGTTTACAAGAAATTTATTACAAGATTAGCTGCTTGTGA300TAAAGGTCTGCA CGAGATGAGATTCAAATACGTAATGAGAATTGCGTGATTTGCACGAGT360TTATATAGCATAATTTGCTAGGAATGTCTGTTGGTTTGTGATGTTTAGGTGTTCGCTGCA420TTAATTATAAGACTATGTCGTACAAAGTGATTGTACCCGCTACCGTGC TA470MetSerTyrLysValIleValProAlaThrValLeu1510CCGCCGTGGCTCAGAGTCGGTGAGAATTGGATATTCGCAAGACACAG A518ProProTrpLeuArgValGlyGluAsnTrpIlePheAlaArgHisArg152025CGCACCGAGGTGGGAGTCGTTCTACCGGCGAACACGAAATTTCGTGTA 566ArgThrGluValGlyValValLeuProAlaAsnThrLysPheArgVal303540CGAGCAGATTTCTCTAGGGCCGGCTTCACCCGACCCGTAATAGTGCGC614 ArgAlaAspPheSerArgAlaGlyPheThrArgProValIleValArg45505560CTCTTGAACAACAACCGTAGCACTGAACGAGAAATCAACTTGAACAAC 662LeuLeuAsnAsnAsnArgSerThrGluArgGluIleAsnLeuAsnAsn657075GACCAATGGATGGAGGTGGAGCATGCGCACGAGAGTGTGCCTTTCGT A710AspGlnTrpMetGluValGluHisAlaHisGluSerValProPheVal808590GATTGGCTGGTGGGCGAAAAGAACACTATGGCCGAAGTGTATTTTGA A758AspTrpLeuValGlyGluLysAsnThrMetAlaGluValTyrPheGlu95100105ATCGACGGACCACACATACCGCTACCCGTGTACGTGTTCAACACGAGA 806IleAspGlyProHisIleProLeuProValTyrValPheAsnThrArg110115120CCCGTCGAACACTTTAAGAGCGAGTATCGCCAAAGTTCGTCTGGCTAC854 ProValGluHisPheLysSerGluTyrArgGlnSerSerSerGlyTyr125130135140TGCTTTCTATATTTGGACCTGGTCTGTATGTTGGTACCGCCCGCTAGC 902CysPheLeuTyrLeuAspLeuValCysMetLeuValProProAlaSer145150155AAAAACGCTTTATTGGACGTGAACATTTTCGAGCTTCATCAATTTTA T950LysAsnAlaLeuLeuAspValAsnIlePheGluLeuHisGlnPheTyr160165170AACGAAATCATTAATTACTATGATGACCTGTGCGGCTTGGTCGAGGA T998AsnGluIleIleAsnTyrTyrAspAspLeuCysGlyLeuValGluAsp175180185CCATACGCAGACACTGTCGATTCGAATTTACCCAACAAGGCTGCTTTC 1046ProTyrAlaAspThrValAspSerAsnLeuProAsnLysAlaAlaPhe190195200GTGAAAGCTGATGCTGGCGGTCCGGGTGGTGCGTATTATGGACCATTT1094 ValLysAlaAspAlaGlyGlyProGlyGlyAlaTyrTyrGlyProPhe205210215220TGGACGGCACCGGCGAGCTCAAACCTTGGTGATTACCTCAGAATATCG 1142TrpThrAlaProAlaSerSerAsnLeuGlyAspTyrLeuArgIleSer225230235CCGACCAACTGGATGGTAATTCACGAGCTGGGTCATGCATACGATTT T1190ProThrAsnTrpMetValIleHisGluLeuGlyHisAlaTyrAspPhe240245250GTGTTTACCGTCAACACTATACTCATTGAAATTTGGAACAACTCTTT -1238ValPheThrValAsnThrIleLeuIleGluIleTrpAsnAsnSerLeu255260265TGCGATCGCATCCAATACAAGTGGATGAACAAAATTAAAAGACAACAA 1286CysAspArgIleGlnTyrLysTrpMetAsnLysIleLysArgGlnGln270275280CTGGCTCGCGTCTATGAAAATAGACGACCGCAGAAAGAGGCGACCATT1334 LeuAlaArgValTyrGluAsnArgArgProGlnLysGluAlaThrIle285290295300CAGGCGCTGATCGACAATAACAGCCCGTTCGATAATTGGGGCTTTTTT 1382GlnAlaLeuIleAspAsnAsnSerProPheAspAsnTrpGlyPhePhe305310315GAGAGGCTGATAATATTCACGTGGCTGTACAACCCGCAAAGAGGACT A1430GluArgLeuIleIlePheThrTrpLeuTyrAsnProGlnArgGlyLeu320325330GACACATTGCGTAACATCAACCATTCGTACAGGGTGCACGCCACCCG C1478AspThrLeuArgAsnIleAsnHisSerTyrArgValHisAlaThrArg335340345AACTCTTCTATACCGTACCCGCAAATATGGTCATGGCTAACGACTTCT 1526AsnSerSerIleProTyrProGlnIleTrpSerTrpLeuThrThrSer350355360GCTTACGACAACTTTTGGTTATATTTTAATTTGGTAGGCGTGTACCCG1574 AlaTyrAspAsnPheTrpLeuTyrPheAsnLeuValGlyValTyrPro365370375380GCAGACTTTTACGTAAACGAACACAACAAAGTTGTTCATTTCAATCTA 1622AlaAspPheTyrValAsnGluHisAsnLysValValHisPheAsnLeu385390395CACTTGAGAGCTTTGGCGTTGGGGCAGAGTGTGCGTTATCCCATTAA A1670HisLeuArgAlaLeuAlaLeuGlyGlnSerValArgTyrProIleLys400405410TATATAATTACAGACTTTGATCTGGTGAGCAAAAACTACGACATTAA A1718TyrIleIleThrAspPheAspLeuValSerLysAsnTyrAspIleLys415420425CAGTATTTAGAGAGTAATTTCGATCTGGTTATACCAGAAGAATTGCGG 1766GlnTyrLeuGluSerAsnPheAspLeuValIleProGluGluLeuArg430435440CAGACCGATTTGTTGGCGGACGTGAGGGTGGTTTGTGTGATTGACGAT1814 GlnThrAspLeuLeuAlaAspValArgValValCysValIleAspAsp445450455460CCGTCGCAGATTGTGGGCGAACCGTTTAGCGTGTACGACGGGAACGAG 1862ProSerGlnIleValGlyGluProPheSerValTyrAspGlyAsnGlu465470475CGAGTGTTCGAGAGTACGGTGGCCACGGACGGAAACATGTATCTGGT G1910ArgValPheGluSerThrValAlaThrAspGlyAsnMetTyrLeuVal480485490GGCGTGGGTCCGGGAGTGTACACGTTGCGTGCGCCACGCGGCAAAAA C1958GlyValGlyProGlyValTyrThrLeuArgAlaProArgGlyLysAsn495500505AAACGCTACAAACTCCATTTGGCACATTCGCCCAGAGAGCCCGTTCAT 2006LysArgTyrLysLeuHisLeuAlaHisSerProArgGluProValHis510515520CCGGCCAACGACCACATGTATCTGCTCGTGACGTATCCCTACTACAAT2054 ProAlaAsnAspHisMetTyrLeuLeuValThrTyrProTyrTyrAsn525530535540CAAACGTTGACATACACACCGTACGTAAATTCTGACCTAGCCGTCGAC 2102GlnThrLeuThrTyrThrProTyrValAsnSerAspLeuAlaValAsp545550555ATGGCTCATTTGTTCGGCAGCAACGATCGTAGGTATGTAGCCACGAT A2150MetAlaHisLeuPheGlySerAsnAspArgArgTyrValAlaThrIle560565570TATTTCAATCCATTCGAACAAACAGTCACCGTACATCTAAACAATAT T2198TyrPheAsnProPheGluGlnThrValThrValHisLeuAsnAsnIle575580585CGTGCCGGTCGTGAAAACAACACTACCCTGTACTTTGAAATGGTAATT 2246ArgAlaGlyArgGluAsnAsnThrThrLeuTyrPheGluMetValIle590595600AGCAACCCGTTCAACGGGCAGAGCCAAACTTTCACTATACTCGAAGAC2294 SerAsnProPheAsnGlyGlnSerGlnThrPheThrIleLeuGluAsp605610615620AATCCCACTTTACGACAAGGCTACTACAAATTTGACGTGGTCACGTAC 2342AsnProThrLeuArgGlnGlyTyrTyrLysPheAspValValThrTyr625630635AGCTCCATAAGGCTGAATATGAGCGTCGCGGGTCGGCTATTATTTCG G2390SerSerIleArgLeuAsnMetSerValAlaGlyArgLeuLeuPheArg640645650CGATACATTTTTGCCGGAGGTACCACCACGCTGACCATGTTCCCAAA T2438ArgTyrIlePheAlaGlyGlyThrThrThrLeuThrMetPheProAsn655660665CAAGTACTTGAGCCCAATTTGTTTCCAGACGGTTCCGCCTTGAATAGG 2486GlnValLeuGluProAsnLeuPheProAspGlySerAlaLeuAsnArg670675680ACATTGGCACGACTAAGAGAACAGGCCGCCTTCCTAGATAATTATTCA2534 ThrLeuAlaArgLeuArgGluGlnAlaAlaPheLeuAspAsnTyrSer685690695700CAACTTATGTATATTGAAAACGAGTTGCGCGACACGATTTATTTGGCC 2582GlnLeuMetTyrIleGluAsnGluLeuArgAspThrIleTyrLeuAla705710715TCCCAGTTGGTAGATCCTGCGTCAGACGAATTTGTAAAGTATTATCC A2630SerGlnLeuValAspProAlaSerAspGluPheValLysTyrTyrPro720725730GACTACTTCAGAGATCCGCACACGTACGTGTACTTGTTTCGTTTCAG A2678AspTyrPheArgAspProHisThrTyrValTyrLeuPheArgPheArg735740745GGTCTGGGTGATTTCGTGTTATTAGACTTGCAGATTGTACCATTGCTA 2726GlyLeuGlyAspPheValLeuLeuAspLeuGlnIleValProLeuLeu750755760AATTTGGCCACTGTACGTATAGCCAACATCCAAAACGGTCCCCACTCG2774 AsnLeuAlaThrValArgIleAlaAsnIleGlnAsnGlyProHisSer765770775780TACTTCGATACTTTGTATTTTAAAGTGGAGTTGCGCGACACAAACGGT 2822TyrPheAspThrLeuTyrPheLysValGluLeuArgAspThrAsnGly785790795GCGATTGTGTTTTCGTATTCGCGCCGTGGCAACGAGCCGATGACACC C2870AlaIleValPheSerTyrSerArgArgGlyAsnGluProMetThrPro800805810GAACACCATAAATTTGAAGTGTACAGTGGTTACACCGTAGAATTGTT C2918GluHisHisLysPheGluValTyrSerGlyTyrThrValGluLeuPhe815820825ATGCGGGAACCCGGTAATCGATTACAATTGATTGTGAACAAAATGCTT 2966MetArgGluProGlyAsnArgLeuGlnLeuIleValAsnLysMetLeu830835840GACACAGCGTTGCCGTCTACTCAAAACATTTTCGCTCGCATCACCGAC3014 AspThrAlaLeuProSerThrGlnAsnIlePheAlaArgIleThrAsp845850855860ACTCAATTAGTGGTGGGGGATACGAGCATTGAAGATAACCTTGTAACG 3062ThrGlnLeuValValGlyAspThrSerIleGluAspAsnLeuValThr865870875AGTATTAATGTAGATTGTGGCGACGACGACAACCAAAAGATAAGAGT T3110SerIleAsnValAspCysGlyAspAspAspAsnGlnLysIleArgVal880885890GTGGAAACGTTAAAAATGATAGCGTTCTAATAACGTTCAACAGTCAGTTA 3160ValGluThrLeuLysMetIleAlaPhe895900TCGACTGTCGCCGCGACGACATGACACTGGTGGGTGTAGTAGTTTGCGTGCTGTTGTTAT3220CGTCTGTAGACGGTTATTCGTTTTATTCGTCGATT GAAGCCCTGCTTTTGAACGATCGCA3280CACAACTTTGCATAGGCGACTGTTACGAACGCAATGGCCAGCATTTGTGTGCCAGCACGT3340GGTCGGGATCAGAGTCTCGGTGCATAAGTGTTTTCAACAAGACCAAACACTATCGTACGG3400AGACTAACGG AAAATGCATAAGTAACTGTGCCAACTTCAACAACTACGCCCACGAATGGT3460GTGCCGTGTCCCGGTCGAAATGGGGCCGTTGCAGCAGACGACTGGCGCTCACAGCGACAC3520GAACACACGCCACCCACAACAAGTTCAAGACATGTG 3556(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 2:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 3572 basepairs(B) TYPE: Nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: Doublestranded(D) TOPOLOGY: Circular(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: Genomic DNA(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: No(iv) ANTI-SENSE: No(v) FRAGMENT TYPE: N/A(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudaletia unipuncta granulosis virus(vii) IMMEDIATE SOURCE:(A) LIBRARY: GENOMIC DNA(B) CLONE: EcoRI-I and subclones(viii) POSITION IN GENOME:(A) CHROMOSOME/SEGMENT: N/A(B) MAP POSITION: Unknown(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: Mature protein(B) LOCATION: 451 bp to 3155 bp(C) IDENTIFICATION METHOD: Experimentally (D) OTHER INFORMATION: Degrades specialPeritrophic Membrane proteins(ix) FEATURE:(A) NAME/KEY: Baculovirus very latepromoter(B) LOCATION: 443 to 447 bp(C) IDENTIFICATION METHOD: Experimentally(D) OTHER INFORMATION: N/A(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQUENCE ID NO: 2:ATGCATACACACCAGCTTCTGTTATAAATACTGTA TTAAATTGCCAATTAGATGGAAGTT60GTGTATTTATAAACGTTCGGTCCTGTATATCTTGCCAATGATTTGCGCCATATTTGTTTT120ACATGATCTCGGATAGCTTTTTGAGGATTAGTGTATCCCAAAAATTGCGCTATACCATGT180CCGCGTACAT AAATTTATCATTTTCCACTTCCACAATCCAAATTTCCGCAGAAACTCCTC240CAATGTTGCACGATTTTTTTACAAGAGTCATTTTGCACGTTTACAAGAAATTTATTACAA300GATTAGCTGCTTGTGATAAAGGTCTGCACGAGATGAGATTCAAATACGTAATG AGAATTG360CGTGATTTGCACGAGTTTATATAGCATAATTTGCTAGGAATGTCTGTTGGTTTGTGATGT420TTAGGTGTTCGCTGCATTAATTATAAGACTATGTCGTACAAAGTGATTGTA471 MetSerTyrLysValIleVal15CCCGCTACCGTGCTACCGCCGTGGCTCAGAGTCGGTGAGAATTGGATATTC522ProAlaThrValLeuProPro TrpLeuArgValGlyGluAsnTrpIlePhe101520GCAAGACACAGACGCACCGAGGTGGGAGTCGTTCTACCGGCGAACACGAAA573AlaArgHisArgArgThrGlu ValGlyValValLeuProAlaAsnThrLys25303540TTTCGTGTACGAGCAGATTTCTCTAGGGCGGGCTTCACCCGACCCGTAATA624PheArgValArg AlaAspPheSerArgAlaGlyPheThrArgProValIle455055GTGCGCCTCTTGAACAACAACCGTAATACTGAACGAGAAATCAACTTGAAC675ValArgLeu LeuAsnAsnAsnArgAsnThrGluArgGluIleAsnLeuAsn60657075AACGACCAATGGATGGAGGTGGAGCATGCGCACGAGAGTGTGCCGTTTGTC726AsnAspGlnTrpMetGluValGluHisAlaHisGluSerValProPheVal808590GATTGGCCGGTGGGCGAAAGGAACATTATGGCCGAAGTGTATTTTGAA ATC777AspTrpProValGlyGluArgAsnIleMetAlaGluValTyrPheGluIle95100105GACGGACCACACATACCGCTGCCCGTGTACGTGTTCAACACGAGACCT GTC828AspGlyProHisIleProLeuProValTyrValPheAsnThrArgProVal110115120125GAACACTTTAAGAGCGAGTATCGCCAAAGTTCGTCTGGC TACTGCTTTCTA879GluHisPheLysSerGluTyrArgGlnSerSerSerGlyTyrCysPheLeu130135140TATTTGGACCTGGTCTGTATGTTGGTACCGCCCGCT AGCAAAAACGCTTTA930TyrLeuAspLeuValCysMetLeuValProProAlaSerLysAsnAlaLeu145150155160TTGGACGTGAACATTTTCGAGCTT CATCAATTTTATAACGAAATCATTAAT981LeuAspValAsnIlePheGluLeuHisGlnPheTyrAsnGluIleIleAsn165170175TACTATGATGACCTGTGC GGCTTGGTCGAGGATCCATACGCAGACACTGTC1032TyrTyrAspAspLeuCysGlyLeuValGluAspProTyrAlaAspThrVal180185190GATTCGAATTTACCCAAC AAGGCTGCTTTCGTGAAAGCTGATGCTGGCGGT1083AspSerAsnLeuProAsnLysAlaAlaPheValLysAlaAspAlaGlyGly195200205210CCGGGTGGT GCGTATTATGGACCATTTTGGACGGCACCGGCGAGCTCAAAC1134ProGlyGlyAlaTyrTyrGlyProPheTrpThrAlaProAlaSerSerAsn215220225CTTGGT GATTACCTCAGAATATCGCCGACCAACTGGATGGTAATTCACGAG1185LeuGlyAspTyrLeuArgIleSerProThrAsnTrpMetValIleHisGlu230235240 245CTGGGTCATGCATACGATTTTGTGTTTACCGTCAACACTATACTCATTGAA1236LeuGlyHisAlaTyrAspPheValPheThrValAsnThrIleLeuIleGlu250255 260ATTTGGAACAACTCTTTATGCGATCGCATCCAATACAAGTGGATGAACAAA1287IleTrpAsnAsnSerLeuCysAspArgIleGlnTyrLysTrpMetAsnLys265270 275ACCAAAAGACAACAACTGGCTCGCGTCTATGAAAATAGACGACCGCAGAAA1338ThrLysArgGlnGlnLeuAlaArgValTyrGluAsnArgArgProGlnLys280285 290295GAGGCGACCATTCAGGCGCTGATCGACAATAACAGCCCGTTCGATAATTGG1389GluAlaThrIleGlnAlaLeuIleAspAsnAsnSerProPheAspAsnTrp300 305310GGCTTTTTTGAGAGGCTGATAATATTCACGTGGCTGTACAACCCGCAAAGA1440GlyPhePheGluArgLeuIleIlePheThrTrpLeuTyrAsnProGlnArg315 320325330GGACTAGACACATTGCGTAACATCAACCATTCGTACAGGGTGCACGCCACC1491GlyLeuAspThrLeuArgAsnIleAsnHisSerTyrArgValHisAlaThr 335340345CGCAACTCTTCTATACCGTACCCGCAAATATGGTCATGGCTAACGACTTCT1542ArgAsnSerSerIleProTyrProGlnIleTrpSerTrpLeuThrThrSer 350355360GCTTACGACAACTTTTGGTTATATTTTAATTTGGTAGGCGTGTACCCGGCA1593AlaTyrAspAsnPheTrpLeuTyrPheAsnLeuValGlyValTyrProAla 365370375380GACTTTTACGTAAACGAACACAACAAAGTTGTTCATTTCAATCTACACTTG1644AspPheTyrValAsnGluHisAsnLysValValHisPheAsnL euHisLeu385390395AGAGCTCTGGCGTTGGGGCAGAGTGTGCGTTATCCCATTAAATATATAATT1695ArgAlaLeuAlaLeuGlyGlnSerValArgTyrProIleL ysTyrIleIle400405410415ACAGACTTTGATCTGGTGAGCAAAAACTACGACATTAAACAGTATTTAGAG1746ThrAspPheAspLeuValSerLysAsnT yrAspIleLysGlnTyrLeuGlu420425430AGTAATTTCGATCTGGTTATACCAGAAGAATTGCGGCAGACCGATTTGTTG1797SerAsnPheAspLeuValIleP roGluGluLeuArgGlnThrAspLeuLeu435440445GCGGACGTGAGGGTGGTTTGTGTGATTGACGATCCGTCGCAGATTGTGGGC1848AlaAspValArgValValCysV alIleAspAspProSerGlnIleValGly450455460465GAACCGTTTAGCGTGTACGACGGGAACGAGCGAGTGTTCGAGAGTACGGTG1899GluProPheSerV alTyrAspGlyAsnGluArgValPheGluSerThrVal470475480GCCACGGACGGAAACATGTATCTGGTGGGCGTGGGTCCGGGAGTGTACACG1950AlaThrAspG lyAsnMetTyrLeuValGlyValGlyProGlyValTyrThr485490495500TTGCGTGCGCCACGCGGCAAAAACAAACGCTACAAACTCCATTTGGCACAT2001LeuArgAlaProArgGlyLysAsnLysArgTyrLysLeuHisLeuAlaHis505510515TCGCCCAGAGAGCCCGTTCATCCGGCCAACGACCACATGTATCTGCTC GTG2052SerProArgGluProValHisProAlaAsnAspHisMetTyrLeuLeuVal520525530ACGTATCCCTACTACAATCAAACGTTGACATACACACCGTACGTAAAT TCT2103ThrTyrProTyrTyrAsnGlnThrLeuThrTyrThrProTyrValAsnSer535540545550GACCTAGCCGTCGACATGGCTCATTTGTTCGGCAGCAAC GATCGTAGGTAT2154AspLeuAlaValAspMetAlaHisLeuPheGlySerAsnAspArgArgTyr555560565GTAGCCACGATATATTTCAATCCATTCGAACAAACA GTCACCGTACATCTA2205ValAlaThrIleTyrPheAsnProPheGluGlnThrValThrValHisLeu570575580585AACAATATTCGTGCCGGTCGTGAA AACAACACTACCCTGTACTTTGAAATG2256AsnAsnIleArgAlaGlyArgGluAsnAsnThrThrLeuTyrPheGluMet590595600GTAATTAGCAACCCGTTC AACGGGCAGAGCCAAACTTTCACTATACTCGAA2307ValIleSerAsnProPheAsnGlyGlnSerGlnThrPheThrIleLeuGlu605610615GACAATCCCACTTTACGA CAAGGCTACTACAAATTTGACGTGGTCACGTAC2358AspAsnProThrLeuArgGlnGlyTyrTyrLysPheAspValValThrTyr620625630635AGCTCCATA AGGCTGAATATGAGCGTCGCGGGTCGGCTATTATTTGGCGAT2409SerSerIleArgLeuAsnMetSerValAlaGlyArgLeuLeuPheGlyAsp640645650ACATTT TTGCCGGAGGGTACCACCACGCTGACCATGTTCCCAAATCAAGTA2460ThrPheLeuProGluGlyThrThrThrLeuThrMetPheProAsnGlnVal655660665 670CTTGAGCCCAATTTGTTTCCAGACGGTTCCGCCTTGAATAGGACATTGGCA2511LeuGluProAsnLeuPheProAspGlySerAlaLeuAsnArgThrLeuAla675680 685CGACTAAGAGAACAGGCCGCCTTCCTAGATAATTATTCACAGCTTATGTAT2562ArgLeuArgGluGlnAlaAlaPheLeuAspAsnTyrSerGlnLeuMetTyr690695 700ATTGAAAACGAGTTGCGCGACAGCATTTATTTGGCCTCCCAGTTGGTAGAT2613IleGluAsnGluLeuArgAspSerIleTyrLeuAlaSerGlnLeuValAsp705710 715720CCTGCGTCAGACGAATTTGTAAAGTATTATCCAGACTACTTCAGAGATCCG2664ProAlaSerAspGluPheValLysTyrTyrProAspTyrPheArgAspPro725 730735CACACGTACGTGTACTTGTTTCGTTTCAGAGGTCTGGGTGATTTTGTGTTA2715HisThrTyrValTyrLeuPheArgPheArgGlyLeuGlyAspPheValLeu740 745750755TTAGACTTGCAGATTGTACCATTGCTAAATTTGGCAACTGTACGTATAGCT2766LeuAspLeuGlnIleValProLeuLeuAsnLeuAlaThrValArgIleAla 760765770AACAACCACAACGGTCCCCACTCGTACTTCGATACTTTGTATTTTAAAGTG2817AsnAsnHisAsnGlyProHisSerTyrPheAspThrLeuTyrPheLysVal 775780785GAGTTGCGCGACACAAACGGTGCGATTGTGTTTTCGTATTCGCGCCGTGGC2868GluLeuArgAspThrAsnGlyAlaIleValPheSerTyrSerArgArgGly 790795800805AACGAGCCGATGACACCCGAACACCATAAATTTGAAGTGTACAGTGGTTAC2919AsnGluProMetThrProGluHisHisLysPheGluValTyrS erGlyTyr810815820ACCGTAGAATTGTTCATGCGGGAACCCGGTAATCGATTACAATTGATTGTG2970ThrValGluLeuPheMetArgGluProGlyAsnArgLeuG lnLeuIleVal825830835840AACAAAATGCTTGACACAGCGTTGCCGTCTACTCAAAACATTTTCGCTCGC3021AsnLysMetLeuAspThrAlaLeuProS erThrGlnAsnIlePheAlaArg845850855ATCACCGACACTCAATTAGTGGTGGGGGATACGAGCATTGAAGATAACCTT3072IleThrAspThrGlnLeuValV alGlyAspThrSerIleGluAspAsnLeu860865870GTAACGAGTATTAATGTAGATTGTGGCGACGACGACAACCAAAAGATAAGA3123ValThrSerIleAsnValAspC ysGlyAspAspAspAsnGlnLysIleArg875880885890GTTGTGGAAACGTTAAAAATGATAGCGTTCTAATAACGTTCAACAGTCAGTTA3176ValValGluThrL euLysMetIleAlaPhe895900TCGACTGTCGCCGCGACGACATGACACTGGTGGGTGTAGTAGTTTGCGTGCTGTTGTTAT3236CGTCTGTACACGGTTATTCGTTTTATTCGTCGATTGAAGCCCTGCTTTTGAACGA TCGCA3296CACAACTTTGCATAGGCGACTGTTACGAACGCAATGGCCAGCATTTGTGTGCCAGCACGT3356GGTCGGGATCAGAGTCTCGGTGCATAAGTGTTTTCAACAAGACCAAACACTATCGTACGG3416AGACTAACGGAAAATGCATAAGTAACTGTG CCAACTTCAACAACTACGCCCACGAATGGT3476GTGCCGTGTCCCGGTCGAAATGGGGCCGTTGCAGCAGACGACTGGCGCTCACAGCGACAC3536GAACACACGCCACCCACAACAAGTTCAAGACATGTG3572