Abstract:
An integrated circuit and method of testing and repairing the integrated circuit. The integrated circuit includes: a multiplicity of macro-circuits having the same function; a fuse bank, the state of the fuses storing test data indicating at least which macro-circuits failed a test; and means for preventing utilization of failing macro-circuits during operation of the integrated circuit and a method generating a partial good integrated circuit, the method including: providing an integrated circuit have a multiplicity of macro-circuits arranged in one or more groups, each macro-circuit having the same function and a fuse bank containing fuses; testing each macro-circuit prior to a fuse programming operation; programming the fuses in the fuse bank in order to store data indicating at least which macro-circuits failed the testing step; and preventing utilization of each failing macro-circuit during operation of the integrated based on the data stored in the fuse bank.

Description:
This application is continuation of copending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/859,834 filed on Sep. 24, 2007 which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,305,600 issued on Dec. 4, 2007. 

   FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
   The present invention relates to the field of integrated circuits; more specifically, it relates to an integrated circuit designed with partial good functionality and the method of testing the integrated circuit. 
   BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   When a fault in an integrated circuit chip caused by a manufacturing defect is detected during testing, the entire integrated circuit chip is rendered non-functional unless a method of repair has been provided. Integrated circuit chips having such repair capability may use redundancy, (substitution of redundant circuits for failing circuits) partial good techniques, (ignoring or disabling some circuitry, and accepting reduced function or performance) or a combination of both. When partial good techniques are being used and partial good chips are detected during test, these chips need to be sorted into multiple part numbers based upon the exact circuit or circuit location that has failed. This indicates to the user what the function or performance of each chip will be. With more than a few circuits that could fail and still allow a partial good chip, this method becomes costly and difficult for production control organizations to administer. Therefore, there is a need for methods and integrated circuits that are repairable in a more cost-effective manner. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   A first aspect of the present invention is an integrated circuit, comprising: a multiplicity of macro-circuits, each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of identical macro-circuits being a logic circuit having the same function; one or more repairable circuits; a fuse bank containing a multiplicity of fuses partitioned into a first set of fuses and a second set of fuses, states of fuses of the first set of fuses storing test data indicating at least which macro-circuits of the multiplicity of macro-circuits failed a first test, states of fuses of the second set of fuses storing test data indicating which repairable circuits of the one or more repairable circuits failed a second test; a scan multiplexer and control circuit connected to scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads and connected to each of the identical macro-circuits, the scan multiplexer and control circuit including means for selectively connecting the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads to and disconnecting the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads from each of the macro-circuits of the multiplicity of identical macro-circuits during testing of the multiplicity of identical macro-circuits; means for isolating each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits from any other logic circuits of the integrated circuit chip and means for connecting scan-in and scan-out pins dedicated to each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits to respective pads of the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads; means for permanently preventing utilization of those macro-circuits during operation of the integrated circuit that did not pass the test during operation of the integrated circuit, the means for permanently preventing responsive to the state of fuses in the fuse bank; and means to replace failing circuit portions of the repairable circuits with redundant good circuit portions based on a state of fuses of the second set of fuses. 
   A second aspect of the present invention is method of generating a partial good integrated circuit, the method comprising: providing an integrated circuit having: a multiplicity of macro-circuits arranged in one or more groups, each macro-circuit of the same group being identical and having the same function; one or more repairable circuits; a fuse bank containing a multiplicity of fuses partitioned into a first set of fuses and a second set of fuses, states of fuses of the first set of fuses storing test data indicating at least which macro-circuits of the multiplicity of macro-circuits failed a first test, states of fuses of the second set of fuses storing test data indicating which repairable circuits of the one or more repairable circuits failed a second test a scan multiplexer and control circuit connected to scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads and connected to each of the identical macro-circuits, the scan multiplexer and control circuit including means for selectively connecting the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads to and disconnecting the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads from each of the macro-circuits of the multiplicity of identical macro-circuits during testing of the multiplicity of identical macro-circuits; means for isolating each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits from any other logic circuits of the integrated circuit chip and for means for connecting scan-in and scan-out pins dedicated to each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits to respective pads of the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads; and means to replace failing circuit portions of the repairable circuits with redundant good circuit portions based on a state of fuses of the second set of fuses; isolating the macro-circuits from other circuits of the integrated circuit by connecting scan-in and scan-out pins dedicated to each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits to respective pads of the scan-in I/O pads and scan-out I/O pads; performing a first testing operation of each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits prior to a fuse programming operation; performing a second testing operation on each repairable circuit of the one or more repairable circuits prior to the fuse programming operation; programming fuses in the first set of fuses in order to store data indicating which macro-circuits failed the first testing operation; programming fuses in the second set of fuses in order to store data indicating which repairable circuits failed the second testing operation; for each macro-circuit of the multiplicity of macro-circuits that failed the first testing operation, permanently preventing utilization of the entire failing macro-circuit during operation of the integrated circuit based on data stored in the first set of fuses and configuring the integrated circuit to utilize only macro-circuits that passed the testing; and for each repairable circuit of the one or more repairable circuits replacing failing circuit portions of the repairable circuits with redundant good circuit portions based on data stored in the second set of fuses. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
     The features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein: 
       FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram of an integrated circuit chip according to the present invention; 
       FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram illustrating the chip architecture for testing the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 1 ; 
       FIG. 3A  is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating the interconnections between macro-circuits, isolation circuits and other logic circuits of the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 2 ; 
       FIG. 3B  is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of scan node connections for the circuit of  FIG. 3A  for non-partial good logic testing; 
       FIG. 3C  is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of scan node connections for the circuit of  FIG. 3A  for macro-circuit partial good logic testing; 
       FIG. 4  is a schematic diagram illustrating grouping of macro-circuits for macro circuit testing according to the present invention; 
       FIG. 5  is an overall flowchart of a method of designing, fabricating and testing the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 1  according to the present invention; 
       FIG. 6  is a detailed flowchart of a method of wafer level testing of the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 1  according to the present invention; and 
       FIG. 7  is a detailed flowchart of a method of post fuse blow wafer level and module level testing of the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 1  according to the present invention. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
   For the purposes of the present invention, a macro-circuit is defined as a group of one or more circuits that perform a predetermined function. The circuits may be as simple as a single passive (i.e. resistor, capacitor inductor) or active (i.e. diode, transistor) device, a single gate (e.g., AND, NAND OR, NOR, INVERT) or as complicated as a microprocessor. Often macro-circuits are pre-designed as cores in a design library. Examples of macro-circuits include, microprocessors, embedded memory circuits and custom function circuits to name a few. 
     FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram of an integrated circuit chip  100  according to the present invention. In  FIG. 1 , integrated circuit chip  100  includes groups of macro-circuits  105 , a fuse bank  110  including a partial good section  115  containing fuses storing data related to macro-circuits within groups of macro-circuits  105  and a non-partial good fuse section  125  containing fuses storing data related to optional static random access memory (SRAM) circuits  120 . Groups of macro-circuits  105  may contain one or more groups of macro-circuits. Each group of macro-circuits may contain one or more identical macro-circuits. Fuse bank  110  may include one fuse storing pass or fail information for each macro-circuit in groups of macro-circuits  105  or a lesser amount of fuses for storing data only for failing macro-circuits in groups of macro-circuits  105 . Fuse bank  110  may include laser blow fuses, electrical blow fuses or electrical blow antifuses. The term blowing a fuse is defined as being the same as programming a fuse. Integrated circuit chip  100  further includes a fuse decompress circuit  130  decompressing (if the fuse bank contains information in compressed form) the data represented by the fuses and for moving the fuse data into a macro shift register  135  and an optional SRAM shift register  140  for readout. Data in macro-circuit shift register  135  is read by a disable control circuit  145  which may disable failing macro-circuits within groups of macro-circuits  105  directly, or disable control circuit  145  may be used by a system which integrated circuit chip  100  is connected to, the system disabling failing macro-circuits within the group of macro-circuits. Disabling may be by disconnection of failing macro-circuits or, in the example of the macro-circuits being microprocessors, by setting their “busy” bit or “disabled” bit permanently on, so no operations are directed to failing macro-circuits, or by other methods known in the art. Repair circuits within each SRAM  120  read fuse data from SRAM shift register  140  (which contains the data stored in non-partial good fuse portion  125  of fuse bank  110 ) and affect repair of failing portions of each SRAM circuit  120  by replacement of failing circuits with redundant (spare) tested good circuits. 
   Optional non-partial good fuse portion  125  of fuse bank  110 , SRAM shift register  140  and SRAMs  120  are illustrated to show how the present invention may be integrated into well-known repair schemes. The SRAM circuits may not be present or may be replaced or augmented by any other repairable circuit (such as embedded dynamic random access memory) or even fuse adjustable circuits (such as voltage regulators and frequency dividers). More than one group of macro-circuits may be present on the same integrated circuit chip, connected to the same fuse bank by multiple serial shift registers or each macro-circuit group having its own fuse bank and supporting circuitry. Additional logic circuits, testable by means well known in the art, may be present but are not illustrated in  FIG. 1 . These additional logic circuits (as well as the optional SRAM circuits  120  or their substitutes as described supra) are for the purposes of the present invention designated as non partial good (NPG) circuits and the macro-circuits within groups of macro-circuits  105  are designated partial good (PG) circuits because integrated circuit chip  100  still can function with one or more failing macro-circuits within groups of macro-circuits  105 . 
     FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram illustrating the chip architecture for testing integrated circuit chip  100 . In  FIG. 2 , integrated circuit chip  100  includes a multiplicity of macro-circuits  150  and a multiplicity of isolation circuits  155 . There is one isolation circuit  155  for each macro-circuit  150 . Each macro circuit  150 /isolation circuit  155  is coupled to a macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  by a corresponding bus  165 . Each bus  165  includes wires for at least macro-circuit scan-out signals and isolation circuit scan-in, scan-out and control signals. Macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  is further coupled to all the NPG circuit scan chains  170  by a bus  175 . Bus  175  includes wires for at least multiple NPG scan-in signals and multiple NPG scan-out signals. Macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  is also coupled to multiple I/O pads  180 A by bus  185 A for receiving scan-in signals from off chip, multiple I/O pads  180 B by bus  185 B for sending scan-out signals off chip and multiple I/O pads  180 C by bus  185 C for receiving mode and configuration control signals from a tester. Mode and configuration control signals are used by macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  to configure scan chains for testing either macro-circuits  150  or the NPG circuits of integrated circuit chip  100  as illustrated in  FIGS. 3A ,  3 B,  3 C and  4  and described infra. While not necessarily separate signals, mode control can be thought of as selecting whether to test macro-circuits or NPG circuits and configuration signals can be thought of as selecting groups of macro-circuits to test together. While isolation circuits  155  are illustrated “outside” of macro-circuits  150 , the isolation circuits may be incorporated within each macro-circuit. 
   In operation, macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160 , in conjunction with isolation circuitry  155 , acts to prevent faults in individual macro-circuits  150  from propagating into NPG circuit scan chains  170  during NPG circuit testing and to prevent faults in NPG circuits or other macro-circuits  150  from propagating to the macro-circuit scan chain of the macro-circuit currently being tested. While scan chain isolation techniques are used in describing the present invention it should be understood that many techniques may be used for effecting isolation of macro-circuits  150  and NPG circuits during testing, including, but not limited to: boundary scan, macro-circuit by-pass multiplexing, clock disablement and any other techniques well known in the art. 
     FIG. 3A  is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating an example of the interconnections between macro-circuits  150 , isolation circuits  155  and other logic circuits of the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 2 . In  FIG. 3A , isolation circuits  155  (see  FIG. 2 ) include a multiplicity of input isolation multiplexers  190 A and input latches  195 A and a multiplicity of output isolation multiplexers  190 B and output latches  195 B. 
   A first input of each input latch  195 A is coupled to an isolation scan-in node of a first isolation scan chain (ISO SCAN-IN  1 ) (in the case of the first input latch  195 A) or the output of a previous input latch  195 A (in the case all other input latches  195 A in the first isolation scan chain). A second input of each input latch  195 A is coupled to the output of its corresponding input isolation multiplexer  190 A. The output of each input latch  195 A is coupled to a first input of its corresponding input isolation multiplexer  190 A. The output of the last input latch  195 A is also coupled to an isolation scan-out node of the first isolation scan chain (ISO SCAN-OUT  1 ). The output of each input isolation multiplexer  190 A is coupled to internal logic  150 A of macro circuit  150 . A second input of each input isolation multiplexer  190 A is coupled to an input NPG logic circuit  200 A. Input NPG logic circuits  200 A are the circuits that supply input signals to macro-circuit  150  during functional operation. Input NPG logic circuits  200 A are coupled sequentially between an NPG scan-in node of a first NPG scan chain (NPG SCAN-IN  1 ) and an NPG scan-out node of the first NPG scan chain (NPG SCAN-OUT  1 ). 
   A first input of each output latch  195 B is coupled to an isolation scan-in node of a second isolation scan chain (ISO SCAN-IN  2 ) (in the case of the first output latch  195 B) or the output of a previous output latch  195 B (in the case all other output latches  195 B in the second isolation scan chain). A second input of each output latch  195 B is coupled to the output of its corresponding output isolation multiplexer  190 B. The output of each output latch  195 B is coupled to a first input of its corresponding output isolation multiplexer  190 B. The output of the last input latch  195 B is also coupled to an isolation scan-out node of the second isolation scan chain (ISO SCAN-OUT  2 ). A second input of each output isolation multiplexer  190 B is coupled to internal logic  150 A of macro circuit  150 . The output of each output isolation multiplexer  190 B is coupled to an output NPG logic circuit  200 B. Output NPG logic circuits  200 B are the circuits that receive output signals from macro-circuit  150  during functional operation. Output NPG logic circuits  200 B are coupled sequentially between an NPG scan-in node of a second NPG scan chain (NPG SCAN-IN  2 ) and an NPG scan-out node of the second NPG scan chain (NPG SCAN-OUT  2 ). 
   Macro-circuit internal logic  150 A is coupled between a MACRO SCAN-IN node and a MACRO SCAN-OUT node. All input isolation multiplexers  190 A are responsive to an isolation input control signal (ISO ICNTRL) carried by bus  165  of  FIG. 2 . All output isolation multiplexers  190 B are responsive to an isolation output control signal (ISO OCNTRL) carried by bus  165  of  FIG. 2 . Macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  (see  FIG. 2 ) is used to affect connections between the various scan-in and scan-out nodes for NPG testing and macro-circuit testing as illustrated in  FIGS. 3B and 3C  and described infra. 
     FIG. 3B  is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of scan node connections for the circuit of  FIG. 3A  for NPG logic testing. In  FIG. 3B , macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  (see  FIG. 2 ) makes the following connections for NPG circuit logic  200 A and  200 B testing: node NPG SCAN-IN  1  is coupled to a first scan-in pin, node NPG SCAN-OUT  1  is coupled to node ISO SCAN-IN  1 , node ISO SCAN-OUT  1  is coupled to a first scan-out pin, node ISO SCAN-IN  2  is coupled to a second scan-in pin, node ISO SCAN-OUT  2  is coupled to a second scan-out pin, node NPG SCAN-IN  2  is coupled to a third scan-in pin and node NPG SCAN-OUT  2  is coupled to a third scan-out pin. This set of connections, coupled with setting ISO OCNTRL equal to A1@ prevents faults in macro circuits  150  from propagating into NPG logic  200 A and  200 B during NPG testing, while allowing complete observation of NPG logic. While three scan-in pins and three scan-out pins are illustrated in  FIG. 3B , any number of scan-in and scan-out pins may be used by adjustment to the interconnection scheme. 
     FIG. 3C  is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of scan node connections for the circuit of  FIG. 3A  for macro-circuit  150  partial good logic testing. In  FIG. 3C , macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160  (see  FIG. 2 ) makes the following connections for macro-circuit  150  testing: node ISO SCAN-IN  1  is coupled a scan-in pin, node ISO SCAN-OUT  1  is coupled to node MACRO SCAN-IN, node MACRO SCAN-OUT is coupled to node ISO SCAN-IN  2  and node ISO SCAN-OUT  2  is coupled to a scan-out pin. This set of connections, coupled with setting ISO ICNTRL equal to “1:” and ISO OCNTRL equal to “0” prevents faults in NPG logic  200 A and  200 B from propagating into macro-circuit  150  testing during macro-circuit testing, while allowing complete observation of macro circuit  150 . While a single macro-circuit  150  is illustrated in  FIG. 3C , multiple identical macro-circuits  150 , are used according to the number of macros in a group from groups of macro circuits  105 , (See  FIG. 1 ) and could share a single scan-in pin. Each macro in a group always has its own scan-out pin. This is illustrated in  FIG. 4  and described infra. 
     FIG. 4  is a schematic diagram illustrating groupings from the set of groups of macro-circuits  150  for macro circuit testing according to the present invention. In  FIG. 4 , a multiplicity of macro-circuits  150  are grouped into groups of identical macro-circuits  205 . Each isolation circuits  155  of each macro-circuit  150  in each group of macro-circuits is coupled to the same scan-in I/O pad  210  through macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160 . Each isolation circuits  155  of each macro-circuit  150  in each group of macro-circuits is coupled to a different scan-out I/O pad  215  through macro-circuit scan multiplexer and control logic  160 . The maximum number of scan-out I/O pads  215  (W) determines the maximum number of macro-circuits  150  in each group of macro-circuits  205 , which can be tested at one time. There may be less than W macro-circuits with a group of macro-circuits  155 . All macro-circuits  150  within a single group of macro-circuits  155  must be identical (or at least testable by the same test pattern) since all the Macro-circuits in the group will receive the same test patterns via the single scan-in pad. 
     FIG. 5  is an overall flowchart of a method of designing, fabricating and testing integrated circuit chip  100  of  FIG. 1  according to the present invention. In step  225 , sections of an integrated circuit design that are compatible with the concept of partial good as described supra, (e.g. that could be disabled without causing a fatal failure of the entire integrated circuit) are identified and labeled as candidates for a partial good logic scheme. Isolation logic, standard test logic including scan chains, and supporting circuits such as registers, additional fuse banks etc are added to the design. Alternatively, the macro-circuits could be pre-designed to be compatible with the partial good concept of the present invention or the integrated chip could be designed from the early design stages to be partial good compatible. 
   In step  230 , normal wafer fabrication is performed. 
   In step  235 , wafer final test is performed. In wafer final test, first, a normal test of non-partial good logic (and any embedded memory) is performed; second, a custom test of partial good logic is performed; and third a determination of a fuse blow pattern is made and stored in a fuse blow file. This fuse blow pattern is a digital representation of the failing macro-circuits of the partial good logic. Custom test of partial good logic is illustrated in  FIG. 6  and described in more detail infra. 
   In step  240 , the fuses are blown to encode the identity of failing macro-circuits on the integrated circuit chip itself. A fuse blow tool reads the fuse blow file created during partial good testing by the tester. Fuse blow may be either by laser or electric means. 
   In step  245 , a post fuse blow test is performed. The four main steps are one, a normal testing of non-partial good logic (and any embedded memory); two, reading of the fuses blown in the partial good section of the integrated circuit=s fuse bank; three, masking of scan chain outputs to eliminate known partial good fails; and four, determining if the macro-circuits group is good (e.g. enough non-failing macro-circuits to meet a predetermined performance or functional level.) Masking is defined as an instruction to a tester program to ignore any resultant test data related to a particular macro-circuit. In one example, masking is an instruction to a tester to ignore data on a particular scan-out pin (I/O pad). 
   In step  250 , the integrated chip is built or assembled into a module and in step  255 , a module test is performed. Module test is substantially the same as post fuse blow test described in step  245 . 
     FIG. 6  is a detailed flowchart of the method of wafer level testing of the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 1  according to the present invention. In step  260 , all non-partial good logic is tested. If any of this logic fails any test, testing is terminated, and the integrated circuit chip is marked as a fail on a pre-fuse blow map by the tester. In step  265 , it is determined if all partial-good configurations have been tested. A partial good configuration is a group of identical macro-circuits to be tested. Returning to  FIG. 2 , a configuration is a set of macro-circuits  150 . 
   If in step  265 , it is determined that all the partial good configurations have not been tested, the method proceeds to step  270 . In step  270 , the tester program is incremented to the next partial good configuration and scan chain multiplexer control signals for the current configuration applied. 
   Next in step  275 , it is determined if all partial good test patterns for the current configuration have been applied. If in step  275 , it is determined that all test patterns for the current configuration have been applied, the method loops to step  265 , otherwise the method proceeds to step  280 . 
   In step  280 , the tester selects the next test pattern for the current partial good configuration and applies that test pattern to the current partial good configurations. 
   Next in step  285 , it is determined if the current configuration passes the current test pattern. If in step  285 , it is determined that the current configuration passes the current test pattern, the method loops to step  275 , otherwise the method proceeds to step  290 . 
   In step  290 , the tester determines which macro-circuit is failing, masks out the scan chain outputs for the failing macro-circuit for subsequent tests and writes the identity of the failing macro-circuit to the partial good fuse file. 
   In step  295 , it is determined if the number of failing macro-circuits of the current partial good configuration exceeds a predetermined limit. If in step  295 , it is determined that the limit has not been exceeded, the method proceeds to step  300  where a retest with the same pattern is performed and then to step  285 ; otherwise the method proceeds to step  305 , testing is terminated and the integrated circuit chip is marked as a fail on the pre-fuse blow map by the tester. 
   Returning to step  265 , if in step  265  it is determined that all the partial good configurations have been tested, then in step  310 , the integrated circuit chip is marked as good (or partial good) and in step  315  the integrated circuit chip is sent to fuse blow. Electrical fuse blow may be performed by the tester; laser fuse blow requires a laser fuse blow tool that will read the partial good fuse data file created in step  290 . 
     FIG. 7  is a detailed flowchart of the method of post fuse blow wafer level and module level testing of the integrated circuit chip of  FIG. 1  according to the present invention. In step  330 , all non-partial good logic is tested. If any of non-partial good logic fails test, testing is terminated and the integrated circuit chip is marked as a fail on a post-fuse blow map or a module is marked as not good. 
   In step  335 , the partial good macro-circuit fuse data is read from the integrated circuit chip itself and a global masking table is generated identifying all partial good failing macro-circuits. 
   Next in step  340 , it is determined if all partial-good configurations have been tested. If in step  340 , it is determined that all the partial good configurations have not been tested, the method proceeds to step  345 , otherwise the method proceeds to step  350  where the integrated circuit chip is marked as passing post fuse blow test or module test. 
   In step  345 , the tester program is incremented to the next partial good configuration and the scan chain multiplexer control signals for the current configuration applied. Next in step  355 , the global mask table is checked for failing macro-circuits belonging to the present configuration and the scan chain outputs of defective partial good macro-circuits in the current configuration are masked. 
   In step  360 , it is determined if all patterns for the current configuration have been applied. If all patterns have been applied, the method loops to step  340  otherwise the method proceeds to step  365 . In step  365 , the test pattern is incremented and the test pattern applied. 
   In step  370 , it is determined if the current configuration passes the current test pattern. If in step  370 , the current configuration passes the current test pattern, the method proceeds to step  360  where a check for the need for additional test patterns required is done. Else if in step  370 , the current configuration fails the current test pattern, the method proceeds to step  375  where testing is terminated and the integrated circuit chip is marked as a fail on a post-fuse blow map or the module is marked as not good. 
   Thus, the embodiments of the present invention provide methods and integrated circuits that are cost-effective to repair. 
   The description of the embodiments of the present invention is given above for the understanding of the present invention. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of various modifications, rearrangements and substitutions as will now become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the present invention may employ logic built-in self-test (LBIST) instead of an external tester. Therefore, it is intended that the following claims cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.