Abstract:
A control system used to control a controlled plant includes a main control unit, a first tuning unit, and a second tuning unit. The control system regulated by two weighting parameters of a first multiple and a second multiple, robustness and rapid response are attained, and excess of the output signal the controlled plant generates disappears or approaches zero. The control system has technical features of objective bandwidth, offsetting of low frequency disturbance, and matching of transfer functions. By designing the main control unit, the first tuning unit, and the second tuning unit, regulating the two weighting parameters of the first multiple and the second multiple, and tuning the actual system, the above technical features are obtained.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
   The present invention relates to a control system and an adjusting method thereof, and more particularly relates to a robust control system. 
   BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   The control systems become more and more important in promoting the development of the modern civilization and technology. For example, the home electrical appliances, automobiles, and nightstools in the bathroom are all control systems, which are more popular in industrial application. 
   For the application of the servomechanism, a mathematics model is first set up according to the physical behavior of the system, whereby the behavior of the system is conveniently predicted and controlled by the use of the control function in the mathematics model. 
   The traditional Proportional Integral Differential (PID) controller includes the proportional term, the integral term and the differential term, wherein the proportional item is used to tune the output of the controller according to the dimension of the inaccuracy, the integral term is used to dissipate the inaccuracy in steady state, and the differential term is functional for predicting the trend of inaccuracy. The PID controller is still widely used because of its simple structure. 
   Taking a motor as an example. Please refer to  FIG. 1 , which is a schematic block diagram of a motor control system according to the prior art. 
   As shown in  FIG. 1 , the controlled body  11  in the control system  10  is a motor and its mathematics model is set up based on the physical behavior of the motor operation. The transfer function of the mathematics model is K t /((J m +J d )s+B), wherein J m  is the inertia of the motor, J d  is the inertia of the load, B is a damping coefficient, and K t  is a value of ratio (proportion). 
   The controlled  11  receives a driving signal PV and accordingly produces an output signal PY, which is a rotational speed in this example. The motor is subject to an outside interference while operating, wherein the interference may result from the effects of electromagnetism or machinery. A third summer  111  is deposed to take the interference into consideration of control system  10 , namely, the third summer  111  takes account of the sum of a third operating signal PU 3  from a master controller  12  in front and a interfering signal PW to produce a drive signal PV to drive the motor. 
   The diagram of the conventional motor shown in  FIG. 1  has been simplified. To describe more completely, the third operating signal PU 3  passes trough a high-frequency electric current circuit and then combines with the interfering signal PW, while the third operating signal PU 3  is an equivalent armature electric current and the interfering signal PW is an interfering torque. 
   The master controller  12  in  FIG. 1  is a kind of proportional integral controller. The transfer function of the controller  12  is K P +K I *1/s, which includes a proportional function K P  and a integral function K I *1/s. The proportional function K P  as a proportional coefficient is for raising the gain bandwidth of an open loop of the control system  10 , so as to make the control system  10  to response quickly. The K I  is an integral coefficient, which is used to reduce the following error of stable state in the control system  10 . 
   Because the response speed goes faster with the wider target bandwidth B w  of the control system  10 , the proportional coefficient K P  is set as 2πB w (J m +J d )/K t  generally to ensure the gain bandwidth of the open loop will be provided with the target bandwidth B w . 
   The master controller  12  receives an error signal PE, and then the error signal PE is processed by the proportional function K P  to produce a first operating signal PU 1 , and processed with by the integral function K I *1/s to generate a second operating signal PU 2 . The first operating signal PU 1  and the second operating signal PU 2  are summed by a second summer  121  to output an third operating signal PU 3 . 
   The control system  10  is a kind of closed loop control system and deposed with a first summer  141 . The first summer  141  subtract the output signal PY of the controlled body  11  from the input signal PR containing a command of the defined values to produce an error signal PE for the master controller  12 . The purpose of the whole closed loop control system  10  is to keep the amplitude of the output signal PY to be identical to that of the input signal PR as far as possible, so as to reduce the influence of the interfering signal PW. 
   Please refer to  FIG. 2 , which is a step response diagram of a control system according to the prior art. The curve A 1  of the input signal of step function command, the curve A 2  of the third operating signal and the curve A 3  of the output signal are illustrated in  FIG. 1 . 
   As shown in  FIG. 2 , the input signal PR is set as a step function command and processed by the master controller  12  to produce the third operating signal PU 3 , which will be provided to the controlled body  11 . When the control system  11  in  FIG. 1  asks for the faster response and minimum error, a larger overshoot will exist in the output signal PY of the controlled body  11 . 
   In addition, since the response of most of the industry process is very slow, it would meet the difficulty when adopting the proportional coefficient, integral coefficient, and a differential coefficient of a differential function to adjust the response of the output signal from the control system. 
   A user probably needs to wait for several minutes or even several hours for observing the responses produced by the adjusting, and thus it becomes a boring and time-wasting job that tuning the controller by the method of try and error. Sometimes, it is even unable to adjust to meet the system&#39;s demands. 
   In sum, the main motivity of the present application is to reduce the overshoot of the outputting signals of the controlled body while the control system processes with fast response and minimum error, as well as reducing the tuning time and procuring the control system robust. 
   From the above description, in order to overcome the drawbacks in the prior art, a control system and a method for tuning the system thereof are provided by the inventor via the devoting research and perseverance working. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a control system and an adjusting method is provided to obtain the robustness and fast response of the control system, and the overshoot of the output signal of the controlled body is diminished and approaches to zero. 
   In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a control system controlling an output signal produced by a controlled object is provided, the control system having a bandwidth and represented by a first mathematic model having a first transfer function, the control system comprising a master control unit, a first adjusting unit, and a second adjusting unit; wherein the master control unit represented by a second mathematic model having a second transfer function configured to make an open loop bandwidth of the control system approach to a target bandwidth and generate a first operating signal; the first adjusting unit represented by a third mathematic model having a third transfer function and configured to receive the first operating signal and generate a first adjusting signal, wherein the first adjusting signal, the output signal, and the first operating signal are calculated for generating a second operating signal, and the output signal approaches to the first adjusting signal, so that an interference signal the controlled object subjects is offset; and the second adjusting unit represented by a fourth mathematic model having a fourth transfer function and configured to receive an input signal for generating a second adjusting signal, wherein the second adjusting signal, the output signal and the input signal are calculated for generating a third operating signal, which is provided for the master control unit and causes the first transfer function of the control system approaching to the fourth transfer function of the second adjusting unit. 
   Preferably, the master control unit comprises a Proportional Integral (PI) Controller. 
   Preferably, the control system further comprise a first adder, a loop stabilizer, a first amplifier, and a second adder; wherein the first adder configured to generate a first result signal by subtracting the output signal from the second adjusting signal; the loop stabilizer receiving the first result signal to generate a second result signal, and represented by a fourth mathematic model having an integral function to cause the control system obtaining a status of zero steady state error; the first amplifier receiving the second result signal and generating a third result signal by amplifying the second result signal by a first multiple, wherein the first multiple is adjusted so that the first transfer function of the control system approaches to the fourth transfer function of the second adjusting unit; and the second adder configured to generate the third operating signal by summing up the input signal and the third result signal and taking off the output signal. 
   Preferably, the controlled object is a motor. 
   Preferably, when the controlled object is a motor, the controlled object has a physical behavior presented by the first transfer function, K t /((J m +J d )s+B), wherein J m  is an inertia of the motor, J d  is an inertia of a load, B is a damping coefficient, and K t  is a ratio; the second transfer function of the master controlled unit is 2πB w J Σ /K t , wherein B w  is the target bandwidth and J Σ  is an estimated inertia value of (J m +J d ); the third transfer function of the first adjusting unit is K t /(J Σ s); and the fourth transfer function of the second adjusting unit is K t /(J Σ s). 
   In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a control system controlling an output signal produced by a controlled object is provided, the control system having a bandwidth and represented by a first mathematic model having a first transfer function, the control system comprising a master control unit and a first adjusting unit; wherein the master control unit represented by a second mathematic model having a second transfer function configured to make an open loop bandwidth of the control system approach to a target bandwidth, and generate a first operating signal; and the first adjusting unit represented by a third mathematic model having a third transfer function and configured to receive the first operating signal and generate a first adjusting signal, wherein the first adjusting signal, the output signal, and the first operating signal are calculated for generating a second operating signal, and the output signal approaches to the first adjusting signal, so that an interference signal the controlled object subjects is offset. 
   Preferably, the controlled object has a physical behavior and the master control unit is designed according to the physical behavior of the controlled object. 
   Preferably, the master control unit comprises a Proportional Integral (PI) Controller. 
   Preferably, the controlled object has a responsive behavior and the first adjusting unit is designed according to the responsive behavior of the controlled object. 
   Preferably, the control system according to claim  6  further comprising a first adder and a first amplifier; wherein the first adder configured to generate a result signal by subtracting the output signal from the first adjusting signal; the first amplifier configured to receive the first result signal and generate a second result signal by amplifying the first result signal by a first multiple, wherein the first multiple is adjusted so that the output signal approaches to the first adjusting signal. 
   Preferably, the control system according further comprising a second adder configured to sum up the second operating signal and the interference signal and provide the controlled object with a summation result of the second operating signal and the interference signal. 
   Preferably, the control system further comprising a second adjusting unit represented by a fourth mathematic model having a fourth transfer function and configured to receive a input signal and thereby generate a second adjusting signal, wherein the second adjusting signal, the output signal and the input signal are calculated for generating a third operating signal provided to the master control unit, so that the first transfer function of the control system approaches to the fourth transfer function of the second adjusting unit. 
   Preferably, the control system further comprising a third adder, a loop stabilizer, a second amplifier, and a fourth adder; wherein the third adder configured to generate a third result signal by subtracting the output signal from the second adjusting signal; the loop stabilizer configured to receive the third result signal, and thereby generate a fourth result signal, the loop stabilizer represented by a fifth mathematic model having an integral function to cause the control system obtaining a status of zero steady state error; the second amplifier configured to receive the fourth result signal and generate a fifth result signal by amplifying the fourth result signal by a second multiple, wherein the second multiple is adjusted so that the first transfer function of the control system approaches to the fourth transfer function of the second adjusting unit; and the fourth adder configured to generate the third operating signal by summing up the input signal and the fifth result signal and taking off the output signal. 
   In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, an adjusting method of a control system for adjusting an output signal generated by a controlled object is provided, the control system having a bandwidth and represented by a first mathematic model having a first transfer function, the method comprising: 
   (a) setting up a target bandwidth for the control system; 
   (b) designing a control function based on the target bandwidth, and thereby causing a open loop bandwidth of the control system approaching to the target bandwidth and generating a first operating signal; 
   (c) generating a first adjusting signal based on the first operating signal; and 
   (d) calculating the first adjusting signal, the output signal and the first operating signal for generating a second operating signal, and thereby causing the output signal approaching to the first adjusting signal by feeding the second operating signal back to the controlled object generating the output signal. 
   Preferably, the step (c) of the adjusting method further comprises the steps of: 
   (c1) designing a first adjusting function according to a responsive behavior of the controlled object; and 
   (c2) processing the first operating signal by the first adjusting function for generating the first adjusting signal. 
   Preferably, the step (d) of the adjusting method further comprises the steps of: 
   (d1) generating a result signal by subtracting the output signal from the first adjusting signal; 
   (d2) generating a second result signal by amplifying the first result signal by a first multiple; 
   (d3) generating the second operating signal by summing up the second result signal and the first operating signal; and 
   (d4) adjusting the value of the first multiple so that the output signal approaches to the first adjusting signal. 
   Preferably, the adjusting method further comprises the steps of: 
   (e) providing an input signal to a second adjusting function for generating a second adjusting signal; and 
   (f) calculating the second adjusting signal, the output signal and the input signal to generate a third operating signal, and causing the first transfer function of the control system approaching to the second adjusting function. 
   Preferably, the step (f) of the adjusting method further comprises the steps of: 
   (f1) generating a third result signal by subtracting the output signal from the second adjusting signal; 
   (f2) receiving the third result signal and processing the third result signal by an integral calculation, so as to generate a fourth result signal; 
   (f3) generating a fifth result signal by amplifying the fourth result signal by a second multiple; 
   (f4) generating the third operating signal by summing up the fifth result signal and the input signal and taking off the output signal; and 
   (f5) adjusting the value of the second multiple so that the first transfer function of the control system approaches to the second adjusting function. 
   The above objects and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparently to those ordinarily skilled in the art after reviewing the following detailed descriptions and accompanying drawings, in which: 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       FIG. 1  is a schematic block diagram showing a conventional motor control system; 
       FIG. 2  is a diagram showing the step response of a conventional control system; 
       FIG. 3  is a schematic block diagram showing the control system of the present invention; 
       FIG. 4  is a schematic block diagram showing a motor as the controlled body of the control system according to the present invention; 
       FIG. 5  is a diagram showing the first step response of the control system showing in  FIG. 4 ; 
       FIG. 6  is a diagram showing the second step response of the control system showing in  FIG. 4 ; 
       FIG. 7  is a diagram showing the third step response of the control system showing in  FIG. 4 ; 
       FIG. 8  is a diagram showing the fourth step response of the control system showing in  FIG. 4 ; and 
       FIG. 9  is a diagram showing the fifth step response of the control system showing in  FIG. 4 . 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
   The present invention will now be described more specifically with reference to the following embodiments. It is to be noted that the following descriptions of preferred embodiments of this invention are presented herein for the purposes of illustration and description only; it is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to the precise form disclosed. 
   In order to describe the control system and the method for tuning the system thereof in the present invention, the multiple preferred embodiments are listed as following. It is to be noted that the following descriptions of preferred embodiments of this invention are presented herein for the purposes of illustration and description only; it is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to the precise form disclosed. 
   Please refer to  FIG. 3 , which is a block diagram showing the first embodiment for the control system according to the present invention. As shown in  FIG. 3 , a control system  30  is configured to control an output signal Y generated by a controlled body  31 , and includes a master control unit  32 , a first adjusting unit  33 , and a second adjusting unit  34 . The master control unit  32  is the kernel of the control system  30 . The master control unit  32  is designed based on the physical behavior of the controlled body  31 , while the control system  30  operates in a open loop status and the first adjusting unit  33  and the second adjusting unit  34  do not join the operation of the control system  30 . Accordingly, the open loop bandwidth of the control system  30  approaches to a target bandwidth B w  and a first operating signal U 1  is generated. 
   In the aforesaid procedure, a first multiple h of a first amplifier  332  in the circuit the first adjusting unit  33  passes through is set as zero to make the first adjusting unit  33  not join the control system  30 , and a second multiple m of a second amplifier  344  in the circuit the second adjusting unit  34  passes through is set as zero to make the second adjusting unit  34  not join the control system  30 . The master control system  32  usually includes a Proportional Integral (PI) Controller. 
   The controlled body would be subject to an interference from unspecified factors, wherein the magnitude of the interference is a interference signal W, which is included in the control range of the control system  30  by using a third adder  311 . The robustness of the control system  30  would be influenced by the interference signal W, and thus the control system  30  cannot operate stably. Thereupon the first adjusting unit  33  is joined into the control system  30 , thereby the control system  30  is able to fast response to offset the interference signal W the controlled body subjects, and thus the robustness of the control system  30  is enhanced. 
   The first adjusting unit  33  is designed based on the responsive behavior of the controlled body  31 , i.e. the transfer function of the first adjusting unit  33  is designed by simulating that of the controlled body  31 . The first adjusting unit  33  receives a first operating signal U 1  and accordingly generates a first adjusting signal Q 1 , wherein the first adjusting signal Q 1 , the output signal Y, and the first operating signal U 1  are calculated for generating a second operating signal U 2 . The third adder  311  sums up the second operating signal U 2  and the interference signal W for generating a driving signal V to drive the controlled body  31  and generate an output signal Y. By way of the feedback affection, the output signal Y is closed to the first adjusting signal Q 1 , thereby the interference signal W the controlled body  31  subjects is offset. The first adjusting unit  33  is suitable for resisting the interference in lower frequency. 
   The procedure of calculating the first adjusting signal Q 1 , the output signal Y and the first operating signal U 1  to generate the second adjusting signal Q 2  is illustrated as follows. The control system  30  further includes a first adder  331 , a first amplifier  332 , and a second adder  333 . The first adder  331  generates a result signal by subtracting the output signal Y from the first adjusting signal Q 1 . The first amplifier receives the first result signal and generates a second result signal by amplifying the first result signal by the first multiple h, wherein the first multiple is adjusted so that the output signal approaches to the first adjusting signal. Then the second adder  333  sums up the first operating signal U 1  and the second result signal T 2  to generate the second operating signal U 2 . 
   The second adjusting unit  34  is joined for speeding up the response speed of the control system  30 , further reducing the error and the overshoot of the controlled body output signal Y, and enhancing the stability of the control system  30 . The second adjusting unit  34  receives an input signal R for generating a second adjusting signal Q 2 , wherein the second adjusting signal Q 2 , the output signal Y and the input signal R are calculated for generating a third operating signal U 3 , which is provided for the master control unit  32 . The first transfer function of the control system  30  will accordingly approaches to the second transfer function of the second adjusting unit  34 . 
   The procedure of calculating the second adjusting signal Q 2 , the output signal Y and the input signal R to generate the third operating signal U 3  is illustrated as follows. 
   The control system  30  further includes a fourth adder  342 , a loop stabilizer  343 , a second amplifier, and a fifth adder  341 . The fourth adder is configured to generate a third result signal T 3  by subtracting the output signal Y from the second adjusting signal Q 2 . The loop stabilizer  343  receives the third result signal T 3  to generate a fourth result signal T 4 . 
   The loop stabilizer  343  further has an integral function F to cause the control system  30  to obtain a status of zero steady state error. The second amplifier  344  receives the fourth result signal T 4  and generates a fifth result signal T 5  by amplifying the fourth result signal T 4  by a second multiple m, wherein the second multiple m is adjusted so that the transfer function of the control system  30  approaches to the transfer function of the second adjusting unit  34 . The fifth adder  341  is configured to generate the third operating signal U 3  by summing up the input signal R and the fifth result signal T 5 , and taking off the output signal Y. 
   A second embodiment is further provided based on the  FIG. 3 . As shown in  FIG. 3 , a control system  30  is configured to control an output signal Y generated by a controlled body  31 , and includes a master control unit  32  and a first adjusting unit  33 . The master control unit  32  is the kernel of the control system  30 . The master control unit  32  is designed based on a target bandwidth B w  of the control system  30 , while the control system  30  operates in a open loop status and the first adjusting unit  33  do not join the operation of the control system  30 . The open loop bandwidth of the control system  30  accordingly approaches to a target bandwidth B w  and a first operating signal U 1  is generated. 
   In the aforesaid procedure, a first multiple h of the first amplifier  332  in the circuit the first adjusting unit  33  passing through is set as zero to make the control system  30  operate without the first adjusting unit  33  joining. The master control unit  32  usually includes a Proportional Integral (PI) Controller. The master control unit  32  is designed based on the physical behavior of the controlled body  31  so that the open loop bandwidth of the control system easily approaches to a target bandwidth B w . Furthermore, the control system  30  includes a fifth adder  341 , which is configured to generate the third operating signal U 3  provided for the master control unit  32  by taking off the output signal Y from the input signal R. 
   The first adjusting unit  33  receives the first operating signal U 1  and accordingly generates a first adjusting signal Q 1 , wherein the first adjusting signal Q 1 , the output signal Y, and the first operating signal U 1  are calculated for generating a second operating signal U 2 . The third adder  311  sums up the second operating signal U 2  and the interference signal W for generating a driving signal V to drive the controlled body  31  and generate an output signal Y. By way of the feedback affection, the output signal Y is closed to the first adjusting signal Q 1 , thereby the interference signal W the controlled body  31  subjects is offset. The first adjusting unit  33  is usually designed based on the responsive behavior of the controlled body  31 , i.e. the transfer function of the first adjusting unit  33  is designed by simulating that of the controlled body  31 . The first adjusting unit  33  is suitable for resisting the interference in lower frequency. 
   The procedure of calculating the first adjusting signal Q 1 , the output signal Y and the first operating signal U 1  to generate the second adjusting signal Q 2  is identical to that of the first embodiment. 
   The control system  30  in the second embodiment further includes a second adjusting unit  34 . The second adjusting unit  34  is configured to receive an input signal R for generating a second adjusting signal Q 2 , wherein the second adjusting signal Q 2 , the output signal Y and the input signal R are calculated for generating a third operating signal U 3 , which is provided for the master control unit  32  and causes the first transfer function of the control system  30  to approach to the second transfer function of the second adjusting unit  34 . 
   The procedure of calculating the second adjusting signal Q 2 , the output signal Y and the input signal R to generate the third operating signal U 3  is identical to that of the first embodiment. 
   For the servomechanism application, a motor is a common used controlled body. Please refer to  FIG. 4 , which is a block diagram showing the motor as a controlled body in the control system according to the present invention. The notations in the control system  40  in  FIG. 4  identical to those in the control system  30  in  FIG. 3  have the name denominations and functions. 
   As shown in  FIG. 4 , The transfer function of the physical behavior of the controlled body  31  is K t /((J m +J d )s+B), wherein J m  is an inertia of the motor, J d  is an inertia of a load, B is a damping coefficient, and K t  is a ratio. In order to design the master control unit  32  according to the physical behavior of the control body  31 , and design the first adjusting unit  33  according to the responsive behavior of the control body  31 , an inertia estimated value J Σ  is adopted to represent the total inertia value of the motor and the load (J m +J d ), wherein J m  is an inertia of the motor, J d  is an inertia of a load. The transfer function of the master control unit  32  is designed as 2πB w J Σ /K t , wherein B W  is the target bandwidth of the control system  40  and J Σ  is the estimated inertia value of (J m +J d ), so that the open loop bandwidth of the control system  40  approaches to the target bandwidth B w . 
   The transfer function of the first adjusting unit  33  is designed as K t /(J Σ s) according to the responsive behavior of the controlled body  31 , whereby the output signal Y the controlled body  31  generates approaches to the first adjusting signal Q 1 , the first adjusting unit  33  generates via the calculation and feedback affection. The transfer function of the second adjusting unit  34  is designed as K t /((J m +J d )s+B), wherein J m  is an inertia of the motor, J d  is an inertia of a load, B is a damping coefficient, and K t  is a ratio, and whereby the transfer function of the control system  40  approaches to that of the second adjusting unit  34  via the calculation and feedback affection. 
   Please refer to  FIG. 5 , which is diagram showing the comparison result of the first step response of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4  and the conventional control system  10  in  FIG. 1 , and in case that setting the target bandwidth B w =50 Hz, the first multiple h=1, and the second multiple m=1. Since the control system  10  is a common P-I-D (Proportional Integral Differential) control structure, a Proportional Integral (PI) controller with the target bandwidth B w =−50 Hz is taken as an example here. 
   As shown in  FIG. 5 , there are an input signal curve of a step function command A 1 , the third operating curve A 2  and the output signal curve A 3  of the control system  10  in  FIG. 1 , and the second operating curve B 1  and the output signal curve B 2  of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . At this time the first adjusting signal Q 1  of the control system  40  corresponding to a first adjusting signal curve (not shown) is generated by the first adjusting unit  33  with a step of 50 Hz bandwidth. As  FIG. 5  shows, the output signal curve B 2  of the control system  40  of the present invention has no overshoot, and rather approaches to the first adjusting signal curve, so as to easily overcome the influence of the damping coefficient B. 
   Please refer to  FIG. 6 , which is a diagram of the second step response of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 , and provided for illustrating the influence of the second multiple m to the control system  40 . In the  FIG. 6 , the estimated inertia is set as J Σ =(J m +J d )/2, the target bandwidth is set as B w =50 Hz, and the first multiple is set as h=1. The second multiple m is set as varied m=1, 2, 3, 4. 
   As shown in  FIG. 6 , there are an input signal curve of a step function command A 1 , the curves of the varied second multiple m=i (i=1, 2, 3, 4) of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 , and the output signal curve PID of the control system  10  in  FIG. 1  for comparison. As  FIG. 6  shows, the output signal curve P-I-D of the prior P-I-D control system  10  in  FIG. 1  has a large overshoot, on the contrary, in the control system  40  of the present invention, with the second multiple m increasing, the corresponding overshoot is minimized, and the rise time of the step response approaches to 20 ms more and more. 
   The influence of the first multiple h to the control system  40  is illustrated in  FIG. 7 , which is a diagram of the third step response of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . In  FIG. 7 , the target bandwidth B w  is set as B w =50 Hz and the second multiple m is set as m=1, and then the first multiple m is set varied as h=1, 2, 4, 6, 8. As shown in  FIG. 6 , there are an input signal curve of a step function command A 1 , the curves of the varied first multiple h=i (i=1, 2, 4, 6, 8) of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . As  FIG. 7  shows, with the first multiple h increasing, the corresponding overshoot is minimized and the rise time of the step response approaches to 20 ms more and more. 
   According to the above illustration, the best setup of the system is the target bandwidth B w =50 Hz, the first multiple h=1, and the second multiple m=4 when the control system  40  is demanded with the situation of the target bandwidth B w =50 Hz and the rise time of the step response as 20 ms and processing without overshoot. 
   The influence of changing the estimated inertia value J Σ  is then illustrated. When the relationship between the inertia of the load J d  and the inertia of the motor J m  is J d =10 J m , the estimated inertia value J Σ  is set as J Σ =6 J m , J Σ =11 J m , and J Σ =16 J m  separately for observing the corresponding changes of the output signal Y of the controlled body  31  in the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . The observing result is shown in  FIG. 8 , which is a diagram of the fourth step response of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . 
   In  FIG. 8 , there are an input signal curve of a step function command A 1 , the third operating signal curves Ci (i=1˜3) in the conditions of varied estimated inertia value J Σ  (J Σ =6 J m , 11 J m , 16 J m ), and the output signal curves Di (i=1˜3). The third operating signal curve C 1  is based on the estimated inertia value J Σ =6 J m , while the third operating signal curve C 2  is based on the estimated inertia value J Σ =11 J m  and the third operating signal curve C 3  is based on the estimated inertia value J Σ =16 J m . The output signal curve D 1  is based on the estimated inertia value J Σ =6 J m , while the output signal curve D 2  is based on the estimated inertia value J Σ =11 J m  and the output signal curve D 3  is based on the estimated inertia value J Σ =16 J m . 
   The three third operating signal curves Di (i=1˜3) is obtained by the operation of the master control unit  32 , the first adjusting unit  33 , and the second adjusting unit  34  via the weighting of the first multiple h and the second multiple m. As  FIG. 8  shows, the control system  40  of the present invention has a well robustness with regard to the change of the estimated inertia value J Σ . 
   Similarly, the influence of changing the inertia of the J d  is then illustrated. When the relationship between the inertia of the load J d  and the inertia of the motor J m  is J d =11 J m , the estimated inertia value J d  is set as J d =5 J m , J d =10 J m , and J d =15 J m  separately for observing the corresponding changes of the output signal Y of the controlled body  31  in the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . The observing result is shown in  FIG. 9 , which is the fifth step response diagram of the control system  40  in  FIG. 4 . 
   In  FIG. 9 , there are an input signal curve of a step function command A 1 , the third operating signal curves Gi (i=13) and the output signal curves Hi (i=1˜3) in the conditions of varied inertia of the load J d  (J d =5 J m , 10 J m , 15 J m ). The third operating signal curve G 1  is based on the inertia of the load J d =5 J m , while the third operating signal curve G 2  is based on the inertia of the load J d =10 J m  and the third operating signal curve G 3  is based on the inertia of the load J d =15 J m . The output signal curve H 1  is based on the inertia of the load J d =5 J m , while the output signal curve H 2  is based on the inertia of the load J d =10 J m  and the output signal curve H 3  is based on the inertia of the load J d =15 J m . As  FIG. 9  shows, the control system  40  of the present invention has a well robustness with regard to the change of the inertia of the load J d . 
   The adjusting method of the control system  30  for adjusting an output signal Y generated by a controlled body  31  is illustrated as following. The method includes steps of: 
   (a) setting up a target bandwidth B w  for the control system  30 ; 
   (b) designing a control function based on the target bandwidth B w , and thereby causing an open loop bandwidth of the control system approaching to the target bandwidth B w  and generating a first operating signal U 1 , wherein the control function is the transfer function of the master control unit  32 ; 
   (c) generating a first adjusting signal Q 1  based on the first operating signal U 1 ; and 
   (d) calculating the first adjusting signal Q 1 , the output signal Y and the first operating signal U 1  for generating a second operating signal U 2 , and thereby causing the output signal Y approaching to the first adjusting signal Q 1  by feeding the second operating signal U 2  back to the controlled body  31  generating the output signal Y. 
   The step (c) in the above-mentioned method further includes the steps of: 
   (c1) designing a first adjusting function according to a responsive behavior of the controlled object  31 , wherein the first adjusting function is the transfer function of the first adjusting unit  33 ; and 
   (c2) providing the first operating signal U 1  for the first adjusting function for generating the first adjusting signal Q 1 . 
   The step (d) in the above-mentioned method further comprises the steps of: 
   (d1) generating a first result signal T 1  by subtracting the output signal Y from the first adjusting signal Q 1 ; 
   (d2) generating a second result signal T 2  by amplifying the first result signal T 1  by a first multiple h; 
   (d3) generating the second operating signal U 2  by summing up the second result signal T 2  and the first operating signal U 1 ; and 
   (d4) adjusting the value of the first multiple h so that the output signal Y approaches to the first adjusting signal Q 1 . 
   Following the step (d) in the above-mentioned method further includes the steps of: 
   (e) providing an input signal R to a second adjusting function for generating a second adjusting signal Q 2 , wherein the second adjusting function is the transfer function of the second adjusting unit  34 ; and 
   (f) calculating the second adjusting signal Q 2 , the output signal Y and the input signal R to generate a third operating signal U 3 , and causing the transfer function of the control system  30  approaching to the second adjusting function. 
   The step (f) in the above-mentioned method further includes the steps of: 
   (f1) generating a third result signal T 3  by subtracting the output signal Y from the second adjusting signal Q 2 ; 
   (f2) receiving the third result signal T 3  and processing the third result signal by an integral calculation, so as to generate a fourth result signal T 4 , wherein the integral calculation is processed by the integral function F in the loop stabilizer  343 ; 
   (f3) generating a fifth result signal T 5  by amplifying the fourth result signal T 4  by a second multiple m; 
   (f4) generating the third operating signal U 3  by summing up the fifth result signal T 5  and the input signal R and taking off the output signal Y; and 
   (f5) adjusting the value of the second multiple m so that the transfer function of the control system  30  approaches to the second adjusting function. 
   The characteristic of the invention is: a control system for controlling an output signal produced by a controlled object, the control system includes a master control unit, a first adjusting unit and a second adjusting unit. By the adjustment of the two weighting parameters, i.e. the first multiple and the second multiple, the robustness and fast response of the control system are obtained, and the overshoot of the output signal of the controlled body is diminished and approaches to zero. The control system has the technical features of the target bandwidth, resisting the interference of low frequency, and transfer function following, which is achieved by the adjustment and control in the substantial machine via the designing of the master control unit, the first adjusting unit, and the second adjusting unit, and the adjustment of the two weighting parameters of the first multiple and the second multiple. 
   In sum, the efficacy and the progressiveness of the control system and the adjusting method of present invention are surely obtained, while the invention has been described in terms of what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention needs not be limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims which are to be accorded with the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures.