Abstract:
A method and related system provides an array of sensing elements located in rows and columns, and each column of sensing elements has a connected circuit chain which processes the signals from the sensing elements in that column. Each circuit chain produces a signal with a corrective gain value calculated for it relative to the datum of the array which is selected for the point where signal strength would be strongest. The method and device is capable of being used in a starring or scanning type array mode.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to infrared detection methods, and relates more particularly to improvements in such detection methods whereby the method and circuitry to perform the corrective signal processing to compensate for known or intrinsic optical signal intensity errors to the image plane of systems using electronics electro-optics sensors is provided to detect a thermal signature which would otherwise be less detectable. 
     In modern electro-optical sensor systems, solid-state electronic devices are used to perform the function of sensing incident radiation at the image plane of the system, integrating this signal, and multiplexing it for processing by systems electronics. Examples of the solid-state electronic devices are the charge coupled device (CCD) used in video cameras and infrared focal plane arrays that are used in many civilian and military systems. For these arrays two principal component materials are used to realize their fabrication. These are the incident radiation sensing detector material and the readout integrated circuit. The detector materials is chosen and optimized for sensing specific incident radiation wavelengths, and the readout is selected for its properties in realizing the desired signal processing to multiplexing functions. 
     Novel signal processing circuitry is described that allows correction of optical system non-uniformities to be performed on focal plane array. In effort to reduce the size and weight of modern infrared focal plane array systems, slower f-number optical systems with shorter cold shields are often used. In these systems, the signal and background intensity levels at the image focal plane decrease with increasing distance from the optical center axis. This results in a situation where some of the signal dynamic range is lost due to the off-axis optical effects. The incorporation of on-focal plane array signal processing electronics that correct for these off axis optical effects allows the full dynamic range of the sensor to be achieved, thus allowing a lower-cost and higher performance system to be realized. 
     In previous scanning and staring focal plane arrays the response to incident radiation (signal chain transimpedance) have been designed such that it is the same for each detector channel. In these systems and in an ideal sense, an incident signal that is non-uniform will produce an output signal from the sensor that has the same non-uniform characteristic. It is possible, however, to calculate based on the design of the optical system, the optical signal intensity errors that will be present. In the case of many infrared systems the signal intensity that reaches the focal plane array decreases on the focal plane with distance from the optical center axis. This effect typically results in a decrease in signal level of 20 percent or more from a signal at the optical center axis. This signal loss therefore accounts for more than 20 percent of the available dynamic range for the sensor output. The off-axis signal intensity error increases with slow optics, shorter cold shields, and larger focal plane arrays. The signal loss places additional systems requirements on the analog to digital converter and subsequent signal processing electronics. 
     Since the intrinsic behavior of these optical systems is known, it is possible to design into the focal plane array a corrective gain that is spatially correlated to the errors introduced from the optical system. This invention describes the methods and circuitry for performing this corrective gain processing for scanning and staring infrared focal plan arrays. Two specific circuit areas are described for this corrective processing. These are the areas of the transimpedance amplifier and the background signal charge skimmer. 
     There is prior art developed in the areas of the optical systems, electro-optics sensors, in the circuitry associated with these devices, but the specific circuitry developed and employed as presented in this application is deemed unobvious and novel. However, it should be noted that similar circuitry and methods within the scope of this invention could be used to realize the corrective signal processing for a wide range of electro-optical sensors and systems. 
     One object of the invention is to provide on-focal plane signal processing electronics for the correction of optically introduced non-uniformities applicable to infrared, visible and other electro-optical sensors in a wide range of applications and markets. 
     Another object of the invention is to allow the use of lower-cost, smaller and lower weight optical systems which are more likely to generate optical signal errors to focal plane. 
     A further object of the invention is to provide such optical systems which are benefit from the incorporation of such on-focal plane signal processing electronics. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention resides in a device for enhancing signal detection comprising a sensory array of sensing elements extending in columns and in rows in first and second orthogonally disposed directions, respectively and a datum selected on the array for reference relative to the columns and rows (x, y). A plurality of circuit chains is provided and each is associated with a given column of the sensing elements for processing a signal into recognizable form. Each of the circuit chains taken relative to the datum has a means for producing a gain different from that of a circuit chain associated with a column of the sensing means located coincidentally with the datum. 
     Ideally, the array is defined by a planar image surface made up of the plurality of the sensing elements and the datum is a point on the array coincident with an optical central axis. Each of the circuits associated with a column of the sensing elements has a circuit portion defined by a capacitive transimpedance amplifier and skimmer circuit portion. The capacitive transimpedance amplifier portion of each of the circuit chains associated with a given column of the sensing elements has a capacitance which differs from the circuit chain associated with the column of sensing elements located coincidentally with the datum. The skimmer circuit portion of the circuit chain associated with the ones of the columns of sensing elements other than that located coincidentally with the datum has a capacitance which differs from the capacitance of the skimmer circuit portion of a circuit chain associated with the circuit chain associated with the sensing elements coincident with the datum. 
     Preferably, each column of the sensing elements extends in the first given direction (columns) and each of the circuit chains associated with the column of sensing elements is connected to one another to effect communication therebetween in the second orthogonally disposed direction (rows). Each of the circuit chains is multiplexed to effect function in the second given orthogonally disposed direction. Also, the array of the sensing elements is row addressed and column addressed by a plurality of multiplexers. 
     The invention further resides in a method of enhancing a signal comprising the steps of providing a sensory array comprised of a plurality of sensory elements arranged in rows and columns; selecting a datum on the array and referencing the rows and columns of the sensing elements relative to the datum; determining a prescribed gain for signals generated from a given column of the sensing element taken relative to the strength of a signal from sensory elements at the datum; and processing signals generated by a given column of the sensing elements in a dedicated circuit chain having an preassigned gain value capable of compensating for signal strength which is less than that of a signal detected at the datum. 
     The method ideally is further characterized by interconnecting circuit chains in each column of sensing elements with one another and by configuring each circuit chain associated with a given column of sensing element to an established prescribed gain by altering the capacitance of that circuit chain relative to the capacitance of the circuit chain associated with the column of sensing elements located coincidentally at the datum. Ideally, sampling is made of the signals produced in a given column of sensing element to establish a prescribed gain. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is an illustration of a scanning infrared focal plane array. 
     FIG. 2 is an illustration of staring infrared focal plane array. 
     FIG. 3 is an illustration of simplified infrared system using a cooled focal plane array. 
     FIG. 4 illustrates a typical cooled focal plane array optical signal path. 
     FIG. 5 is an illustration of off-axis object angle to optics system aperture. 
     FIG. 6 is an illustration of relative intensity of incident radiation as a function of off-axis angle. 
     FIG. 7 is an illustration of the relative intensity of incident radiation effect to scanning sensor. 
     FIG. 8 is an illustration of the relative intensity of incident radiation effect to staring sensor. 
     FIG. 9 is an illustration of relative intensity of incident radiation as a function of distance from center axis. 
     FIG. 10 is a block diagram of circuit components comprising signal chain for FPA with optical signal intensity correction circuitry. 
     FIG. 11 is a block diagram of optical signal intensity correction circuit showing multiplexing configuration. 
     FIG. 12 is a block diagram of skimming and charge integration circuit for processing unit cell charge. 
     FIG. 13 is an illustration of optical signal intensity error and corrective gain for each detector column. 
     FIG. 14 is a graphical representation of data showing calculations for corrective gains for 640 channel FPA for a f/5.6 optical system. 
     FIG. 15 is an illustration of ideal and realized gain capacitors for the skimming and integration stages (by column). 
     FIG. 16 is an illustration of percentage error due to quantization effects in the capacitors for the skimming and integration stages (by column). 
     FIG. 17 is an illustration of 2-dimensional array with optical correction circuitry. 
     FIG. 18 is a partially fragmented schematic diagram of skimming circuit allowing optical correction. 
     FIG. 19 is a partially fragmented schematic diagram of charge integration circuit allowing optical correction. 
     FIG. 20 is an illustration of a timing diagram for charge skimming and charge integration circuits allowing optical correction. 
     FIG. 21 is a block diagram of two dimension focal plane array show critical circuit component blocks. 
     FIG. 22 is a block diagram of a row address multiplexer. 
     FIG. 23 is a block diagram of a column address multiplexer. 
     FIG. 24 is a graphical representation of data from a 240×4 linear infrared imaging sensor showing optical Cos{circumflex over ( )}4 th  signal intensity error at edges of sensor. 
     FIG. 25 is a graphical representation of data from 240×4 linear infrared imaging sensor processed with corrective gain for optical Cos{circumflex over ( )}4 th  signal errors. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     FIG. 1 illustrates a scanning infrared focal plane array  8 . Two principal components, make up the array, namely an infrared detector material  10  and a scanning readout multiplexer  12 . Incident radiation to the different detector material generates a response in the detector, which is sensed, integrated, signal processed and multiplexed by the scanning readout multiplexer. Detector materials for the detector may be InSb, HCT or others. Silicon based technology is generally used to support the design and fabrication of the readout multiplexer. In the case of the scanning multiplexer, the image to be sensed is scanned across the surface of the device and a line or series of lines is sensed at any given time. FIG. 2 illustrates a staring infrared focal plane array  14 . As in the case of the scanning sensor, an infrared detector material  16  is provided and is mated to the staring readout multiplexer  18 . This array differs from scanning format in that all of the lines of the image can be sensed at one time. Thus it is not necessary for the image to be scanned on this array. 
     It should be understood that there are two classes of infrared focal plane arrays that can be considered for incorporation of corrective signal processing electronics for optical effects. These classes are the un-cooled and cooled sensors. In infrared systems, the detector material is sensing infrared radiation. It is the objective of these systems to have the scene dominate the infrared radiation content at the image plane of the infrared focal plane array. However, since warm objects radiate infrared energy, some of the energy reaching the infrared detector will have its origin in the optics and surrounding infrared sensor system. For the system classes of un-cooled and cooled sensors, there are potential differences in the nature and magnitude of the system generated parasitic infrared signals. Although these differences exist it is possible for either system type to calculate and correct for errors in the optical signal levels. 
     FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified view of the scene, infrared optical system  19 , and infrared sensor system. In this illustration a person P is shown as the infrared object in the scene. Radiation from this person is shown by the ray trace  20  through the simplified infrared optical system  19  to the infrared sensor  14 . This illustration shows a cooled staring infrared focal plane array  14  mounted to the cold finger  25  of a cryogenic system. A cold shield  26  is illustrated in the system to shield radiation reaching the infrared sensor or focal plane from the warm surrounding environment. It should be noted here that the cold shield  26  and infrared focal plane array are both thermally connected to the cold finger and are cooled to a temperature significantly below room temperature. The ray trace of the infrared object is shown to pass through the optical system  19 , the warm window  22 , and through the aperture  27  of the cold shield before reaching the image plane of the infrared sensor. The infrared optical system  19  serves the purpose of collecting radiation from the infrared scene and focusing this energy to the image plane. The warm window  22  in conjunction with its supporting shroud  23  provides a vacuum wall allowing thermal isolation for the cold shield, infrared sensor and cold finger. FIG. 4 provides a cross-sectional detail view of the 
     cold infrared sensor  14 , cold shield  26 , and the warm window components  22  described in FIG.  3 . Optical ray traces are shown for the optical center axis and for the edges of the different sensor through the cold shield. The vacuum wall and window  22 ,  23  are warm and radiates infrared optical signal from the surface S which is received at the image plane P of the infrared sensor. It can be seen from FIG. 4 that the oblique angle to the cold shield aperture acts to decrease the apparent aperture size with increasing distance from the optical center axis CA. For the purposes of illustrating the effects of the warm window radiation on the incident radiation levels at the image plane, it is useful to consider that a gray body radiator can approximate the warm window emission properties. The radiation intensity from the warm window at the image plane would be the brightest at the center axis CA of the optical system. As one moves off the optical center axis CA in the plane of the focal plane array, the intensity from the warm window would decrease. As an illustrative analogy, it is useful to consider a large dark room with a single light on the ceiling of the room and in its center, the image plane being the floor of the room. The radiation to the image plane, or floor of the room would be brightest directly below the light. As one moves off axis from that centerline of the light to floor the intensity level on the floor from the light would decrease. This effect is due to two phenomena. First, the distance from the light to the floor increases as we move off axis. Second, the oblique angle to the aperture of the light increases thereby making the apparent aperture size decrease. To illustrate this consider the room to be extremely large and as we move to the corner of the room it will appear as though one is looking at the light side on. 
     As seen in FIG. 5, a similar effect occurs in the optical system as well. For objects in the infrared scene that are off axis, the oblique angle to the aperture  32  of the infrared optical system also increases thereby decreasing the apparent infrared optical system aperture. As such, the collected energy from the infrared scene object decreases as the object moves off axis to the optical system. The net result of both the warm window and an off axis scene object  34  is illustrated in FIG.  6 . The intensity of infrared radiation (line  36 ) from the warm window or off axis scene objects in shown as a line just above the image plane. It can be seen that the intensity is brightest at the optical center axis and decreases off axes. The oblique angle from a location in the image plane to the optical centerline is illustrated with the angle phi. The relative intensity of the off axis radiation at the image plan can be calculated as cos{circumflex over ( )}4 th  (phi). 
     FIG. 7 illustrates the effects of the off axis optical signal errors to the image plane of a scanning infrared sensor  8 . Here the cold shield  26  and warm window  22  are shown above the scanning sensor. Here, the intensity as a function of phi is illustrated above the image plane of the scanning infrared sensor. Similarly, FIG. 8 illustrates the off axis optical signal errors for the staring infrared sensor array  14 . Again the optical signal intensity is shown as a function of phi and is illustrated above the plane of the staring infrared sensor  14 . In the case of the scanning sensor  8 , FIG. 7, the principal effect is in the cross-scan direction or in the same direction as the columns of detectors. For the staring array to be optically effective, it must include two dimensions (columns and rows), as the array has active detector elements of axes in both x and y. 
     FIG. 9 illustrates the relative intensity or solid angle of incident radiation as a function from the optical center axis for a particular f/5.6 optical system with the cold shield located 0.85″ above the focal plane array. The displacement from the center axis is shown in centimeters. For a 640-element sensor with 20-micron pixels it can be seen that a signal loss of approximately 20 percent would occur from the center axis detectors to the detectors at the edge of the array. The optical effects described here are common to slow f-number optical systems where the cold shield is relatively close to the focal plane array. It should be understood however that the techniques described here to correct for optical signal intensity errors could be applied to correct for any known or calculated intensity error effect. 
     Referring now to FIGS. 10 through 23 and to the circuitry that comprises the signal processing chain for performing the corrective signal processing for optical intensity error correction, it should be seen that FIG. 10 illustrates the block diagram for a single channel of the circuitry. The incident radiation sensing detector  50  element is shown to the left in this figure as a p-on-n element. Signal from the detector  50  is initially integrated into unit cell  51 . This signal can then be sampled by the RowEn_B switch  52  to a column-based signal processing chain means. This means comprises a number of different circuit functions, namely a skimmer  56 , Auto Zero  58 , capacitive transimpedance amplifier (CTIA)  60 , a clamp  62 , a clamp buffer  64 , a sample and hold  66 , Mux buffer  68 , and output amplifier  70 . Selectively controllably connected to the input of the amplifier  70  is a column multiplexer  72 . The sampling process for the unit cell is performed by enabling the ROW_B switch  52 , which connects the unit cells integration capacitor to the sensing node of the CTIA  60 . The configuration for the CTIA is preferably shown to be that of an auto zero CTIA. The charge sensing node or input of the CTIA is connected to the charge skimming circuit. Signal output from the CTIA is in turn clamped, buffered, sample and held, and multiplexed to the output amplifier. 
     FIG. 11 illustrates the signal chain from FIG. 10 with the addition of detail of the core multiplexing circuitry  72 . The configuration shown is for a 640×480 sensor array. Row enable select switches  52 ,  52 ′,  52 ″,  52 ′″, show 4 of 480 instances per column based on a signal chain. In the illustrated embodiment, 640 column signal chains are shown to be multiplexed into a single output amplifier. The skimmer  56  and the auto zero CTIA  60  incorporate the optical intensity correction signal processing function. As illustrated in FIG. 12, a signal detected by the unit cell detector  50  is integrated in the unit cell on capacitor Cuc  76 . The charge from the capacitor  76  can then be sensed by enabling the capacitor Cuc  76  to be connected to the Auto zero CTIA sensing amplifier input  78 . This is performed by using the RowEn_B switch(s)  52 . In order to prepare the amplifier(s)  60  to receive the signal from the unit cell capacitor  76 , the amplifier  60  and the skimmer circuit  56  must be reset. The process of resetting the skimmer is performed by closing the switch RstSkim  80  at a time when skim is in its open state. The amplifier is reset by closing switch RstCol  82  and CtiaRst_B  84  then opening switches  82  and  84  (RstCol and CtiaRst_B) in sequence. At this time, closing RowEn_B switch(es)  52  will cause the charge responsible for the potential difference between the integrated potential at capacitor  76  and the potential of Vrstuc to be integrated cross the auto zero CTIA feedback capacitor Cf. Closing switch Skim at the same time as closing RowEn_B allows a charge subtraction process to be performed between the unit cell capacitor Cuc  76  and the skimmer capacitor Cs. This process enables the suppression of background signal prior to the integration of this signal in the auto zero CTIA  60 . 
     It should be known to those skilled in the art that the size of the auto zero CTIA feedback capacitor Cf determines the transimpedance of the signal chain from each unit cell integration capacitor to the output of the CTIA. Similarly, the size of the skimming stage capacitor Cs and the voltage that this capacitor reset to will determine the amount of charge to be subtracted. 
     It should be further understood that the term “gain” has been used in this disclosure at times to describe the relative magnitude of the signal response from the unit cell through the signal chain. This process is typically converting charge to voltage and can also be referred to as transimpedance. FIG. 13 illustrates the effect of the optical signal intensity error as a function of column location on the infrared focal plane array. The cold shield  26  and warm window  22  are shown above the image plane P. The signal intensity level from the warm window&#39;s radiation and optical system is illustrated above the image plane showing a maximum signal level at the center of the optical axis CA. The off axis signal level is shown to decrease, below the image plane P relative to the number of detector columns  90  illustrated. The average signal intensity across each detector column location gives rise to a quantized signal error based on column location. The corrective gain for each column is shown below each detector column. By increasing the gain of the column amplifiers with increasing distance for the optical center axis, it is possible to correct for the spatial optical signal intensity loss. Quantized corrective gains are shown for each column. 
     FIG. 14 illustrates the calculated gain for each 640 detector columns  90  for a f/5.6 optical system with cold shield located 0.85″ above the focal plane array. It is shown here that an error of about 20% in the optical signal intensity is seen between the optical center axis (column  320 ) and the columns at the edge of the sensor (column  1 ,  640 ). 
     FIG. 15 shows two curves superimposed on one another. The first of these curves  92 , the smooth curve, is the calculated capacitance for the auto zero CTIA capacitor Cf to achieve the relative gain as illustrated in FIG.  14 . The second of the superimposed curves  94 , the stair stepped curve, shows the realizable values for the auto zero CTIA capacitor Cf. Due to the limited number of database points allowed in the database for the integrated circuit database, the capacitor Cf can only be implemented in quantized increments. The stair steps shown in curve  94  in the value of Cf reflect these increments. 
     FIG. 16 illustrates the quanitization errors that occur due to the quantization effects in the capacitors Cf and Cs for the skimming and integration stages. It can be seen here that an that an optical intensity error of 20 percent from the optical center axis CA to the sensor edge can be reduced to an error of less than 0.6%. In a similar way, the size of the skimming stage capacitor Cs can also be adjusted to provide skimming levels that have the same relative gain as the incident optical radiation taken relative to the axis CA. As the incident signal intensity decreases with distance from the optical center axis CA, the size of the auto zero CTIA feedback capacitor Cf decreases to normalize the gain. In addition, as the incident signal intensity decreases with distance from the optical center axis the amount of signal to be skimmed also decreases. As a result, the size of the skimming circuit capacitor Cs is also reduced. It is noted that it is desirable to make the capacitors Cf and Cs identical in their implementation such that there gain ratios do not see additional layout quantization affects. 
     FIG. 17 illustrates the spatial implementation of the size adjusted capacitors Cf and Cs to achieve the optical correction signal processing function. Here the two-dimensional array of 3 by 3 unit cells is shown in three column signal processing chains multiplexed to a single output. For this illustration, if the optical center axis CA were aligned with the center column, the signal columns capacitors Cs 1 , Cf 1  and Cs 3  and Cf 3  would have reduced values as compared with the center column capacitors Cs 2  and Cf 2 . 
     Referring now to FIG. 18, the detailed schematic for the skimming circuit  56  implemented on the 640×480 staring infrared sensor array is shown. It can be seen from this schematic that six capacitors  100   a - 100   f  serve the function of capacitor Cs referenced above in the previous illustrations and discussion. Each of the capacitors  100   a - 100   f  has a capacitance of  100   f F . Two transmission gates  104  and  106  are used to enable capacitor  100   a-c  and  100   d-f , respectively. These transmission gates enable the control of the skimming charge quantity for a fixed VSKIM potential operation. It should also be seen from this schematic, that all of the skimming circuit capacitors have been designed to be the same size. The schematic shown in FIG. 18 would be representative of the cell used in the column amplifier corresponding with the optical center axis CA. Cell implementations moving away from the optical center axis CA will have correspondingly decreased values for capacitors  100   a - 100   f  as illustrated in FIG.  15 . FIG. 19 illustrates the schematic diagram of the auto zero CTIA feedback-circuit  60 . As in the case of the skimming circuit the capacitors  102   a - 102   d  are shown at  100   fF  each. These capacitors perform the function of the capacitor Cf referenced above in previous figures and discussions, and are shown at the correct size for the cell used in the column amplifier corresponding with the optical center axis CA. Cell implementations moving away from the center axis CA will have correspondingly decreased values for capacitors  102   a - 102   d  as illustrated by FIG.  15 . Capacitor  102   b  and capacitors  102   c  and  102   d  are enabled by transmission gates  110  and  112 , respectively. These transmission gates allow the gain or transimpedance characteristics for this amplifier to be controlled and to be set to one of four values. 
     It is also possible to correct for optical errors in two-dimensions for staring infrared sensor arrays. This is performed by realizing the capacitors  10   a  through  100   f  shown in FIG. 18, and capacitors  102   c - 102   d  as shown in FIG. 19, through the parallel combination of multiple capacitors. For each of the parallel capacitor instances, an enabling switch is incorporated to allow the capacitors to be connected in parallel with others for that group. These enabling switches allow the value for each capacitor group to be increased or decreased by adding capacitors to the parallel combination or removing capacitors from the parallel combination. 
     For optical systems where the cold shield center axis is centered over the detector, the Cos{circumflex over ( )}4 th  optical effect will provide the strongest optical signal in the center of the row address shift register with decreasing signals at the beginning and ending rows. The incorporation of logic that allows the value for each of the capacitors  100   a  through  100   f  as shown in FIG. 18, and  102   a  through  102   d  as shown in FIG. 19 to be changed as a function of row position allows row dimension optical correction. For example, at the first row each of the capacitors would be set to the smallest value. This value may be 80 percent of the value that would be desired for the center row location. As the row shift register is clocked, shift register taps set R-S latches that directly control the addition of capacitors to the parallel combination. Similarly, at specific row locations, these R-S latches are reset, removing capacitors from the parallel combination. This process provides that ability to adjust the transimpedance of the array as a function of row location and provides a means of performing row based optical gain correction. 
     FIG. 20 illustrates a detailed timing diagram. The auto zero CTIA circuit reset function is performed by the clocks CTIARST and RSTCOL. As is apparent from FIG. 20 these clocks become active at clock state  128  performing the function of resetting the CTIA and clamping the auto zero input to VRSTUC. The clocks signal RSTCOL becomes inactive at clock state  34  and the clock CTIARST becomes inactive at clock state  46 . It should be noted that the pattern shown in FIG. 20 is cyclical. It should also be noted from this timing diagram that the signal ReadUC is the decoded to generate RowEn_B as described above previously. The signal ReadSK is generated simultaneously for the function of skimming. 
     FIG. 21 illustrates a block diagram of the top view of the readout integrated circuit containing the circuitry described in this application. Shown in the center of this diagram is an 8×8 array 120 of unit cells  51 . A row multiplexer  122  is shown to provide the row addressing function and a column multiplexer  124  is shown to provide the column addressing function used in conjunction with column amplifiers  125 . Control and timing generation circuitry  126  is also incorporated for generating biases, bias references and clocks. An output amplifier block  128  is also shown to provide output signal drive to external circuitry. 
     FIGS. 22 and 23 show block diagrams for simplified row address and column address multiplexers, respectively. For these circuits, a single logic state 1 is input into the register with the nominal input logic state at local 0. The row clock and/or column clock serve the function of clocking the logical state 1 down the register and subsequently enabling the row and column enable signals in sequence. 
     Referring now to FIGS. 24 and 25, graphs representative of data taken from SBRC-165 based 240×4 FPAs, integrated with f/1.77 cold shield having an air equivalent height of 0.52″ are shown. More specifically, FIG. 24 shows the mean optical responsivity to be 73.78 mV/K with a maximum in the center of the array and decreasing responsivity to the array edges. It should be noted here that the calculation for responsivity treats the optical illumination as a constant for the array. Optical intensity errors as discussed previously, create a non-uniform optical signal intensity to the image sensor. 
     FIG. 25 shows the same data illustrated by FIG. 24, but incorporating the data for corrective gain using a Cos{circumflex over ( )}4 th  algorithm. It is noted here that the Cos{circumflex over ( )}4 th  corrective gain algorithm slightly over corrects the optical error observed. It is a possibility is that the optical test fixture for this test vignetted the array. Comparisons for the data pre and post optical correction show an improvement from a 1 sigma of 2.09 mV/K to 0.90 mV/K or better than a factor of two. 
     By the foregoing an improved apparatus and method is disclosed. However, numerous modifications and substitutions may be had without departing from the spirit of the invention.