Abstract:
The present invention discloses pharmaceutical products useful for the treatment of allergies, autoimmune diseases, vaccination of mammals, as well as for in vitro diagnostics. These products preferably comprise pollen grains having altered protein composition by means of genetic modification in the plant that produces them. The production process of the present invention comprises the cultivation of genetically modified plants capable of producing pollen grains having modified molecular composition.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
       [0001]    The present invention is related to pharmaceutical products and the production processes therefor. More specifically, this invention is related to pharmaceutical products comprising pollen grains having altered protein composition through genetic modification in the plant that produces them. The production processes of the pharmaceutical products of the present invention comprise the cultivation of genetically modified plants having pollen grains with altered molecular composition, making them useful for the treatment of allergies, autoimmune diseases, as well as the vaccination of eucarytic organisms, and for in vitro diagnosis applications. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    The processes to obtain economically relevant compounds have been changing significantly in recent years in the area of biotechnology. Until recently, the traditional industrial fermentations, for instance, were the main technological option for the production of polypeptides, enzymes, antibiotics and other substances of economical interest. Meanwhile, as the knowledge about microbiology, biochemistry and genetics of the organisms involved in the fermentative processes increased, the production technologies have also been adapted and modified. The development of molecular biology techniques was remarkable in this context: besides offering tools for the understanding of the biochemical, genetic and evolutionary mechanisms of the many species studied, molecular biology also furthered the development of countless alternatives for the industrial production of substances, as a result of the combination possibilities of the different organism&#39;s characteristics. 
         [0003]    The present-day market shows a great demand of products and processes in the Human and/or Animal Health segment and the interest in the development of technologies in this area continues. From the industrial technology standpoint, many factors can be considered as limiting or technological “bottlenecks”. Especially relevant in the production of economically important substances are the costs involved in the purification, which frequently demands a series of complex and costly steps. The determination of the cost of new therapeutic products is a very complex process, if all phases involved are to be considered—from the product conception until its placement on the market. One major factor of impact on the costs is the adopted technology, especially in the case of biological products whose chemical synthesis has not yet been developed or which presents technical or economical disadvantages. The advance of the recombinant DNA technology allowed the production of proteins and other substances in virtually unlimited quantities. On the other hand, the expression system employed has a remarkable influence on the product&#39;s nature and on the production process. A good illustrative example is the production of the Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA), an anti-thrombotic agent used in the treatment of myocardium infarct, thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This substance, when produced by  Escherichia coli , or through the cultivation of genetically modified ovary cells from hamsters (CHO), presents significant differences regarding its structure (glycosilation, need of renaturing etc.) and production processes, which reflects on its price. In  E. coli,  12% of the tPA&#39;s production costs correspond to the fermentative phase of the process and 88% are due to purification. On the other hand, in the production through CHO, 75% of the costs derive from the cellular cultivation and 25% from purification (Datar et al, “Process Economics of Animal Cells and Bacterial Fermentations: A Case Study Analysis of Tissue Plasminogen Activator”  Bio/Technology  11:349-357, 1993). These differences are significant and can be decisively influent in the choice of the process to be used. Still other factors have a special importance in the choice of the production system, such as funds (capital) for the factory&#39;s installation, costs of raw materials, the need of qualified personnel (and its cost) as well as environmental and safety aspects. 
       The Vegetal Model 
       [0004]    A safer and cheaper system to produce biologically originated substances may be idealized in transgenic plants cultivated in contained areas (greenhouses) or in agricultural areas. Furthermore, the vegetal system to produce substances of pharmaceutical interest offers various advantages, among which one might mention the absence of animal viruses and other animal cell products, as well as the absence of the typical contamination of bacterial fermentative processes, from yeasts or animal cells. In this context, the knowledge of the genetic and biochemical mechanisms of some vegetal models is reasonably wide, standing out, among other plants,  Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana tabacum  and  Oryza Sativa . Among the main advantages of the use of the vegetal system for the production of substances with economical interest, one should emphasize the easier scale up, which is fundamental in the case of polypeptides and/or proteins of industrial interest. In the case of using microorganisms (recombinant or not), the phases involved in the scale up are normally the limiting factors of the process economy. This occurs for various reasons, among which the non-linearity of the determining relations of the process&#39; efficiency (oxygen transfer, rheological factors, energy demand of the process etc.), the cost of the necessary production equipments and the need of adequately qualified personnel. In the case of the vegetal system, the mentioned cost components are much lower, since the scale-up tends to be simpler and linear. Besides that, in the evaluation of an industrial process&#39; economy, the strategies seeking to eliminate the largest possible number of purification phases should be considered. Furthermore, plants are metabolically able to perform complex post-translational modifications, such as glycosilations, which widens the scope of possible peptides, antigens or vaccine candidates to be produced by plants. In this sense, the strategy of the present invention comprises the development of expression systems which take into account the most appropriate cellular and sub-cellular localizations for the desired products and, foremost, the elimination of purification steps. 
         [0005]    The reproductive systems of  A. thaliana  and  N. tabacum  have been intensely studied in the recent years and are suitable to the logic of eliminating purification steps of the present invention. The starting point for the idealization of the present invention was the existing knowledge about the genes involved in the vegetal reproductive development and, more precisely, those related to the development of the tapetum which, for some years now, is the study object of the Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Former studies in that laboratory in this area comprise the state of the art of the present invention. On one hand, the knowledge about the expression of the genes involved in the formation of  A. thaliana &#39;s inflorescence (Franco, MSc. Dissertation, UFRJ, 1992) was helpful to understand the function of the oleosin-type proteins, more recently studied with molecular biology techniques associated to microscopy (Ferreira, PhD Thesis, UFRJ, 1997). On the other hand, there also exists knowledge about the regulation mechanisms of the codifying genes of sadi oleosin-type proteins, studied with the help of the β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene marker (Scholte, PhD Thesis, UFRJ, 1998). Even more recently, a strategy of modifying the protein composition of the external surface of pollen grains was described by Foster et al “Modifying the pollen coat protein composition in  Brassica”, Plant Journal  31(4): 477-486, 2002, also described in the document WO 99/49063, by the same authors. However, neither these, nor any other reference known by the author make any allusion or suggestion regarding the use of genetically modified plants for the production of pharmaceutical products in tissues and/or cells of the male vegetal reproductive system, neither do they mention the use of whole, intact, pollen grains derived from genetically modified plants as pharmaceutical products to be used in immunoreactions, as vaccines or as reactive agents for diagnostics, which collectively comprise the objects of the present invention. 
         [0006]    For the purposes of the present invention, one should understand as “tissues and cells of the male vegetal reproductive system” the tissues or cells of the male vegetal reproductive system, including the anthers, tapetum, pollen—grains, parts and combinations thereof. For the purposes of the present invention, one should also understand as “immunoreactions” all reactions that involve cells and/or molecules of the immune system of eukaryotes, including veterbrates, invertebrated, mammals and the like, including mononuclear cells such as macrophages and lymphocytes B and T, neutrophils, eosinophils, besides antigens, antibodies, cytokines and other chemical mediators of the immune system, including parts of the same and its combinations. Furthermore, for the purposes of the present invention, one should understand as “heterologous polypeptide” any aminoacid sequence which is not naturally produced by the plant, but whose synthesis in it derived from the genetic modification undertaken in the plant through the present invention. Without limiting the scope of the present invention, one should emphasize as being of special importance the use of pollen grains containing at least one heterologous polypeptide. 
         [0007]    The present invention offers means to avoid some difficulties in both the production and use of polypeptides with therapeutic and/or diagnostics interest. On one hand, pollen grains are structurally stable, probably as a consequence of the need of reproductive success. Therefore, their “evolution” in order to resist the most diverse environmental stresses is useful to the logic of using them as a product, since their high stability is favorable and desirable. In an additional aspect, whole pollen grains of the present invention may be used in certain applications, bypassing the need of purification. As examples, herein used to illustrate the present invention but not to limit its scope, whole pollen grains containing heterologous polypeptides would permit: the direct use as antigens in the production of diagnostic kits, especially for screening, and its use as a vaccine preferably delivered onto mucous membranes or injected subcutaneously. 
         [0008]    Pollen is often associated to allergy because some people develop symptoms such as sneezing, itching, cough, nasal irritation, eye watering and asthma when exposed to the pollen of certain plants. These particles are carried in large amounts by the air, normally during springtime. When they get in contact with the nasal mucous membranes or the throat, they may trigger allergic reactions known as polinosis or seasonal allergic rhinitis (for more details, consult Balda et al, “Tree-pollen Allergy is Efficiently Treated by Short-term Immunotherapy (STI) with Seven Preseasonal Injections of Molecular Standardized Allergens”.  Allergy  53, 740-748, 1998). As in any allergic process, the polinosis is a high sensibility to certain substances present in the pollen, and considerably varies from person to person, even though there seems to be a familiar correlation. In the majority of allergic reactions, the immune system responds to a “false alarm”, mobilizing the attack against the allergen. The organism produces large quantities of specific IgEs, which bind themselves to the mastocytes in the tissues and to the basophils in the blood. When the allergen meets the IgE the liberation of histamine, prostaglandin, leucothriens and other substances occurs, thus causing the allergy symptoms (for more details, see Batanero et al, “IgE-binding and Histamine-release Capabilities of the Main Carbohydrate Component Isolated from the Major Allergen of Olive Tree Pollen, Ole e 1”.  J Allergy Clin Immunol  103, 147-153, 1999). Some strategies have been developed in order to obtain vaccines against autoimmune diseases and allergies, being generally based on the induction of tolerance. For example, known pollen grain allergens, when prepared in an encapsulated form, have shown to be efficient in the induction of tolerance by means of nasal administration. Nevertheless, the available encapsulating methods of allergens/antigens are laborious and costly, besides generally bringing about the denaturation of said allergens/antigens. The present invention&#39;s approach makes it possible to overcome these problems through the production of heterologous allergens/antigens in pollen grains. 
         [0009]    Due to its natural ability to stimulate the production of specific IgEs and IgGs, we started from the hypothesis that the pollen could become a good candidate as a carrier and deliverer of vaccine antigens in mucous membranes, such as its direct use via nasal immunizations. Besides the already mentioned elevated structural stability of the pollen, an additional characteristic of the present invention under consideration is to enable the use of whole pollen grains as vaccines. Interestingly, one of the goals clearly expressed by the World Health Organization (WHO) is the development of new systems for the delivery of antigen vaccines to the respiratory tract. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that vaccines derived from transgenic plants, when applied in the form of dry powder, seem to be the preferred solution for the lack of homogeneity in the concentrations of antigens produced in plants (for further references, see Sala et al., “Vaccine antigen production in transgenic plants: strategies, gene constructs and perspectives”.  Vaccine  21:803-808, 2003; Mielcarek et al. “Nasal vaccination using live bacterial vectors”.  Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews  51:55-69, 2001). On the other hand, the WHO&#39;s recommendation for the vaccine against tetanus (or lockjaw), for instance, is the administration of three consecutive doses of the respective antigen. This repeated administration has financial and logistical disadvantages, since some patients do not return for the second dose and because the vaccination campaigns have as a limiting factor: the need of a cold chain, considering that practically all vaccines are thermo labile. The availability of vaccines in pollen grains presents itself as capable of solving these mentioned problems, besides being easily delivered (without injections), easily standardized and endowed with an elevated thermal stability, being able to help avoid the logistics problems which are so far inherent to vaccination campaigns. These advantages open up good perspectives for the study and development of this way of immunization in combination with the presentation form of the present invention. 
         [0010]    Several efforts have been made in the last two decades in the sense of trying to develop subunit vaccines for human and veterinary use. The subunit vaccines are based on individual components derived from the infectious agent and, normally, have a low immunogenicity due to the absence of other cellular constituents from which they are often purified. Therefore, when developing vaccines it is desirable to plan the utilization of other substances which have the potential to increase the immune response to the antigens in question, what is normally done with the use of adjuvants. Entire cells or parts thereof can work as self-adjuvants, which is favorable for the present invention&#39;s approach. The identification of an appropriate antigen is only the first step in the development process to obtain a subunit vaccine, since adequate adjuvant systems and delivery systems of the respective antigen are also necessary. An adjuvant can be any material which increases the immune-humoral and/or cellular response to the antigen(s); it is generally accepted in literature that certain adjuvants act through the gradual liberation of the antigens to the cells of the immune system. Recent studies (Wiedermann, et al. “Modulation of an allergic immune response via the mucosal route in a murine model of inhalative type-I allergy”  Intl. Arch. Allergy Immunol.  118:129-132, 1999) have shown that antigenic preparations in powdered form can also increase the incorporation of antigens by the antigen processing cells of the immune system. In this sense, the use of whole pollen grains, due to its powdered nature, offers this additional advantage in the case of application in vaccines. Independently of exactly knowing the specific mechanism involved, it is known that not only the cellular, but also the humoral immunity might be stimulated in various degrees, depending on the antigen, the adjuvant, the administration protocol and the species involved. 
         [0011]    In order to develop an effective and commercially feasible vaccine, the relation between the production cost and the large-scale production capacity of the antigenic preparation and the adjuvant system should be taken into account. On the other hand, the growing number of vaccines under developed and the number of required injections for a wide-ranging immunization program for children, for instance, generates elevated costs and the preoccupation about the discontinuity potential of current vaccination programs. This makes highly desirable the availability of alternative immunization means, especially those allowing the so-called multivalent vaccination, that is, the one that permits to present multiple antigens or epitopes simultaneously. In this context, transgenic plants have been the object of several attempts to obtain “edible” vaccines, due to their notorious advantages in terms of production costs and administration. However, vaccines produced in transgenic plants destined for oral consumption have the disadvantage of passing by the gastrointestinal barrier, which destroys a significant portion of the vaccine antigens. For that reason, the state of the art shows that the amount of antigens required for an effective immune response derived from an edible transgenic plant vaccine is from 100 to 1,000 times higher than the amount of antigens necessary for an effective parenteral immunization (for further reference, see Carter III, J. E., and Langridge, W. H. R. “Plant-based vaccines for protection against infectious and autoimmune diseases”.  Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences  21(2), 93-109, 2002; Streatfield and Howard “Plant-based vaccines”.  International Journal for Parasitology  33, 479-493, 2003). Therefore, the need to develop new alternatives to overcome this difficulties persists. 
         [0012]    The entry route of most pathogenic agents is the mucous surfaces and a large part of the infections is located in the mucous and sub mucous tissues. However, conventional injectable vaccines are poorly efficient for the induction of an immune response in mucous membranes. As a consequence, several experiments are being carried out in order to offer alternatives for the immunization in mucous membranes, which includes, for instance, the incorporation of antigens in larger particles (such as liposomes, immune stimulatory complexes, microspheres) for increasing the efficiency of the immune response in mucous tissues. On the other hand, the use of adequate adjuvants is normally very important for the stimulation of the desired type of immune response. Among the known adjuvants, and in the scope of the present invention, one might point out the vegetable oils. A primary advantage of the use of vegetable oil adjuvants over the use of mineral oils is that vegetable oils can be easier metabolized and are, therefore, more tolerable. Patent literature is rich in examples of the use of vegetable oils as adjuvants in vaccines, including, for instance, documents WO 01/95934 “The use of plant oil-bodies in vaccine delivery systems” and WO 02/00169 “Production of vaccines using transgenic plants or modified plant viruses as expression vectors and transencapsidated viral coat proteins as epitope presentation systems”. Most of these patents disclose formulations and the use of water-in-oil or oil-in-water emulsions which are prepared through the mixture of pure chemical compounds. However, none of the mentioned documents reveals or suggests the use of tissues or cells from the male vegetal reproductive system, such as whole pollen grains, or even parts thereof, as an useful pharmaceutical product in immune reactions or as an antigen-adjuvant combination for immunization, preferably applicable in mucous membranes. In this context, the present invention offers a technical and commercially feasible production alternative of a pharmaceutical product which is potentially useful in the treatment of dysfunctions of the immune system of eucaryotes and which allows, among other characteristics, the production of multiple substances in one single system. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0013]    Having in mind the prior art limitations and all the above-mentioned reports, the present invention provides pharmaceutical products as well as their production process in genetically modified plants. The products of the present invention comprise tissues and/or cells of the male vegetal reproductive system, including bioactive substances to be used in Human and/or Animal Health. 
         [0014]    In one aspect, the present invention provides a production process of pharmaceutical products which overcome difficulties in the production, distribution, storage and logistics of said products. In another aspect, the present invention offers a production process of pharmaceutical products to be used as immune reactions, through the expression, in male vegetal reproductive tissues, of marking genes, codifying genes of antigens and/or therapeutic polypeptides. In yet another aspect, the pharmaceutical products of the present invention are useful in the immune modulation of eukaryotes, including mammals and other vertebrates as well as invertebrates such as insects and the like. From an additional point of view, the pharmaceutical products of the present invention are potentially useful in immune diagnostic reactions. These and other aspects constitute the objects of the present invention and will be clearer through their detailed description and the corresponding attached figures, as well as the appended claims. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0015]    In order to evaluate the applicability of the use of tissues and cells from the male vegetal reproductive system as pharmaceutical products, we evaluated situations which could be considered to be most critical to said use. Therefore, the tested applications, even though not limiting the scope of the present invention, are herein presented as the use of whole pollen grains as vaccines, immunotherapic agents and/or diagnostics reagents. In order to achieve this goal, genetic constructions were developed aiming to allow the expression of a reporter gene in such a way that its presence in plant subcellular structures and in pollen grains could be more easily analyzed. Different genetic constructions containing the reporter gene GUS (codifier of the β-glucuronidase enzyme) were evaluated: (i) the binary vector pDE1001 for the transformation of  N. tabacum  plants containing the reporter gene GUS under the control of the promoter PvChit (promoter of the bean chitinase,  Phaseus vulgaris , the genetic construction of which was detailed in Lima et al., (2002) Bean class IV chitinase promoter is modulated during plant development and under abiotic stress.  Physiologia Plantarum  116:512-521, in a construction herein called pPvchitΔ1200gus,  FIG. 1 ), which allows the intracellular expression of the glucuronidase (GUS) enzyme in tobacco pollen grains; and (ii) the binary vector for the transformation of plants pCambia 1303 ( FIGS. 4 and 6 ) as the receptor of the fusions AtGRP17-GUSGFP under the control of the promoter of a glycine-rich protein—AtGRP17—from  A. thaliana  (formerly called AtGRP7 by de Oliveira et al. “Inflorescence-specific genes from  Arabidopsis thaliana  encoding glycine-rich proteins”.  Plant J.  3:495-507, 1993). This last construction aims to permit the expression of the fusion AtGRP17-GUSGFP on the surface of pollen grains, in order to allow the testing of the pollen grains hereby obtained for the applications of the present invention. 
       Example 1 
     Obtaining “WT” and “GM” Tobacco Pollen Grains 
       [0016]    Wild tobacco plants ( N. tabacum ) from the SR1 lineage, referred to as “WT” in the present invention, and also tobacco plants transformed with the vector pPvchitΔ1200gus ( FIG. 1 ), available from a previous study (Viviane Moreira, PhD Thesis, UFRJ, 2002, also described in Lima et al., “Bean class IV chitinase promoter is modulated during plant development and under abiotic stress”.  Physiologia Plantarum  116:512-521, 2002) were cultivated in a greenhouse until the blossoming of mature flowers. The genetically modified lineage of tobacco in the present invention is referred to as “GM”, and produces pollen grains with an altered composition, containing the GUS enzyme in its interior. The following procedure was adopted in order to collect the pollen grains: as soon as the dehiscence occurred, the entire flowers ( FIG. 2 ) were removed from the WT and GM plants and the intact anthers were transferred into Eppendorf tubes with the help of a scalpel. The average weight of the pollen grains present in each inflorescence was weighted with an analytical scale. Taking into account the difference between the total weight with anthers and the total weight without anthers (after homogeneization and the subsequent removal of the pollen grains present in said anthers), the average weight of pollen grains present in each flower was equal to 1 milligram—consequently, the equivalent of 0.2 milligram for each anther, since one  N. tabacum  flower has 5 (five) anthers. 
       Example 2 
     Evaluation of GUS Stability in “GM” Pollen Grains 
       [0017]    The stability of pollen grains maintained at room temperature (about 25 degrees Celsius) was evaluated qualitatively through the verification of the activity of the p glucuronidase (GUS) enzyme in the GM pollen grains. In order to do so, colorimetrical reactions were performed using 1 μL of the compound X Gluc in 100 μL of phosphate buffer 0.1 M pH 7 and whole transgenic pollen grains containing the GUS enzyme. In the tests performed in laboratory, the activity of the GUS enzyme was kept in stock for at least one year at room temperature. In this context, it is worthwhile to emphasize that the physico-chemical conditions necessary for the maintenance of an enzyme&#39;s activity are much more restricted than the conditions necessary to maintain the immunogenicity of a polypeptide sequence. Therefore, these results suggest an elevated stability of heterologous peptides expressed in the pollen grains of  N. tabacum  “GM”, which is desirable within the scope of applications of the present invention. 
       Analysis of the Immune Response of Rats to Tobacco Pollen Grains 
       [0018]    Since the present invention relates to new production technologies and formulations of pharmaceutical products especially applicable in immune reactions, such as immune modulators, vaccines and diagnosis reagents, the immunoreactivity of pollen grains under different conditions is the starting point for the evaluation of its applicability. The approach used herein includes the study of the immune response of female Wistar rats ( Ratus novergicus ), submitted to different ways of pollen grain exposures. 
         [0019]    The potential of pollen grains to induce inflammation was evaluated by analyzing different administration schedules of WT tobacco pollen grains in rats. The cellular responses of animals submitted to different exposure/sensitizing schemes were monitored by counting the amount of cells present in broncho-alveolar lavage or in pleural fluid and checking the appearance of paw edemas, while the molecular responses were monitored through the observation of protein extravasation, measurement of the total serological IgE and IgG concentrations through ELISA, and of specific serological IgGs against pollen grain proteins by Western Blot. 
         [0020]    Groups of 3 to 6 animals, as indicated, were submitted to the administration of different regimes of saline solution suspensions containing WT or GM tobacco pollen grains, in the concentrations of 0.5, 50 and 500 μg per animal (concentrations based on the average weight of 1 mg of pollen per tobacco flower), with or without the joint administration of aluminum hydroxide (5 mg per animal) as adjuvant. The verification of the occurrence or not of any inflammation in the broncho-alveolar cavity or the pleural cavity was done respectively through broncho-alveolar or pleural washing, followed by the total leucocytes count in a Neubauer chamber and a relative count of monocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils after centrifugation on a glass slide. Both counts were carried out with the help of an optical microscope. As will become shown in the following experiments, none of the tested conditions caused a significant alteration of cell counts consistent with an inflammatory process. Additionally, none of the tested conditions produced significant alteration of the protein exudates, which would be typical of an inflammatory process. Serum samples of the animals submitted to the different experimental conditions were collected and stored for later molecular analysis. And again, none of the pollen grain administration conditions tested showed a significant increase of the total serological IgE and IgG concentrations, according to quantitative measurements through ELISA. The results of the following tables show that none of the different pollen grain administration conditions caused detectable allergic/inflammatory type reactions in animals. 
       Example 3 
     Immune Response of Rats Submitted to a Single Intrapleural Injection 
       [0021]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. The animals were submitted to an 
               
               
                 intrapleural injection of 5 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains 
               
               
                 (100 μL in saline solution). The chart shows the cell counts 
               
               
                 in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 1 
                 17 
                 85 
                 15 
                 0 
                 4.34 
                 0.77 
                 0 
               
               
                 2 
                 25 
                 83 
                 17 
                 0 
                 6.23 
                 1.28 
                 0 
               
               
                 3 
                 16 
                 85 
                 15 
                 0 
                 4.08 
                 0.72 
                 0 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 4.88 
                 0.92 
                 0 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.17 
                 0.31 
                 0 
               
               
                 E.P.M 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.83 
                 0.22 
                 0 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Subtitle abbreviations: 
               
               
                 CAM Leu tot (total leucocytes counted in a Neubauer chamber); 
               
               
                 Mono % (% of monocytes); 
               
               
                 Eos % (% of eosinophils); 
               
               
                 Neut % (% of neutrophils); 
               
               
                 E.P.M. (mean standard error). 
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. The animals were submitted to an 
               
               
                 intrapleural injection of 50 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains 
               
               
                 (100 μL in saline solution). The chart shows the cell counts 
               
               
                 in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 17 
                 86 
                 14 
                 0 
                 4.39 
                 0.71 
                 0 
               
               
                 2 
                 12 
                 78 
                 22 
                 0 
                 2.81 
                 0.79 
                 0 
               
               
                 3 
                 17 
                 88 
                 11 
                 1 
                 4.49 
                 0.56 
                 0.05 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 3.89 
                 0.69 
                 0.02 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.94 
                 0.12 
                 0.03 
               
               
                 E.P.M 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.67 
                 0.08 
                 0.02 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. The animals were submitted 
               
               
                 to an intrapleural injection of 500 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains 
               
               
                 (100 μL in saline solution). The chart shows the cell counts in 
               
               
                 pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 1 
                 20 
                 82 
                 18 
                 0 
                 4.92 
                 1.08 
                 0 
               
               
                 2 
                 21 
                 81 
                 19 
                 0 
                 5.10 
                 1.20 
                 0 
               
               
                 3 
                 23 
                 89 
                 11 
                 0 
                 6.14 
                 0.76 
                 0 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 5.39 
                 1.01 
                 0 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.66 
                 0.23 
                 0 
               
               
                 E.P.M 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.47 
                 0.16 
                 0 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0022]    The results of tables 1-3 show that in none of the tested conditions a statistically significant alteration of the cell counts in pleural lavage occurred, indicating that the administration of pollen grains under these conditions does not induce the characteristic inflammatory response of allergies. In view of these results, a new battery of experiments was conducted by using a larger number of animals and a higher exposure to the pollen grains. 
       Example 4 
     Immune Response of Rats Submitted to Consecutive Intrapleural Injections 
       [0023]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Saline solution intrapleural 
               
               
                 injection (as control, 100 μL per animal) in three consecutive 
               
               
                 exposures with an interval of one week between each exposure. 
               
               
                 The chart shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the 
               
               
                 procedure by intrapleural injection of 5 μg of pollen 
               
               
                 grains in a volume of 100 μL per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 44 
                 78 
                 3 
                 19 
                 11.67 
                 0.45 
                 2.84 
               
               
                 2 
                 30 
                 78 
                 17 
                 5 
                 7.02 
                 1.53 
                 0.45 
               
               
                 3 
                 24 
                 77 
                 16 
                 7 
                 5.54 
                 1.15 
                 0.50 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 8.08 
                 1.04 
                 1.27 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 3.20 
                 0.55 
                 1.37 
               
               
                 E.P.M 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 2.26 
                 0.39 
                 0.97 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intrapleural injection of 
               
               
                 5 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution injection of 
               
               
                 100 μL per animal) in three consecutive exposures with an interval 
               
               
                 of one week between each exposure. The chart shows the cell 
               
               
                 counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure by intrapleural 
               
               
                 iniection of 5 μg of pollen grains in a volume of 100 μL per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 27 
                 85 
                 13 
                 2 
                 6.89 
                 1.05 
                 0.16 
               
               
                 2 
                 45 
                 77 
                 8 
                 15 
                 10.40 
                 1.08 
                 2.03 
               
               
                 3 
                 52 
                 64 
                 11 
                 25 
                 11.32 
                 1.94 
                 4.42 
               
               
                 4 
                 85 
                 69 
                 8 
                 23 
                 19.94 
                 2.31 
                 6.65 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 12.13 
                 1.60 
                 3.31 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 5.54 
                 0.63 
                 2.82 
               
               
                 E.P.M 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 3.20 
                 0.36 
                 1.63 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intrapleural injection of 
               
               
                 50 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution injection 
               
               
                 of 100 μL per animal) in three consecutive exposures with an 
               
               
                 interval of one week between each exposure. The chart shows the 
               
               
                 cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure by 
               
               
                 intrapleural injection of 50 μg of pollen grains in a volume 
               
               
                 of 100 μL per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 50 
                 68 
                 14 
                 18 
                 10.20 
                 2.10 
                 2.70 
               
               
                 2 
                 37 
                 69 
                 14 
                 17 
                 7.66 
                 1.55 
                 1.89 
               
               
                 3 
                 145 
                 71 
                 16 
                 13 
                 37.06 
                 8.35 
                 6.79 
               
               
                 4 
                 36 
                 81 
                 10 
                 9 
                 8.75 
                 1.08 
                 0.97 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 15.92 
                 3.27 
                 3.09 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 14.13 
                 3.41 
                 2.57 
               
               
                 E.P.M 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 8.16 
                 1.97 
                 1.48 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 7 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intrapleural injection of 
               
               
                 500 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution injection 
               
               
                 of 100 μL per animal) in three consecutive exposures with an 
               
               
                 interval of one week between each exposure. The chart shows the 
               
               
                 cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure by 
               
               
                 intrapleural injection of 500 μg of pollen grains in a volume 
               
               
                 of 100 μL per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 67 
                 77 
                 7 
                 16 
                 19.60 
                 1.78 
                 4.07 
               
               
                 2 
                 86 
                 55 
                 7 
                 38 
                 16.08 
                 2.05 
                 11.11 
               
               
                 3 
                 136 
                 56 
                 17 
                 27 
                 30.46 
                 9.25 
                 14.69 
               
               
                 4 
                 147 
                 43 
                 4 
                 53 
                 25.28 
                 2.35 
                 31.16 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 22.86 
                 3.86 
                 15.26 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 6.33 
                 3.60 
                 11.48 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 3.66 
                 2.08 
                 6.63 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0024]    The results of tables 4-7 show that there was no statistically significant alteration of the cell counts in pleural lavage under the conditions of consecutive administrations of 5 and 50 μg of pollen grains. In the condition of administrating 500 μg of pollen grains there was a significant increase in the counts of mononuclear cells and neutrophils, as well as an increase (even though statistically not significant) of eosinophils. These results are also shown in  FIG. 3 , panels A, B and C, respectively. The observed increase of the cell counts in the animals submitted to the administration of 500 μg of pollen grains demonstrates that the animals are responsive only to extreme concentrations of said pollen grains. However, the intrapleural administration of pollen grains in the concentration range of up to 50 μg per animal, in 3 consecutive applications did not induce detectable inflammatory-type response which is typical of allergies. Since the typical conditions of intrapleural administration of antigens very rarely exceed a concentration of 20 μg per animal, these results show that intrapleural pollen grain injections could be, surprisingly, employed in immunization or immunotherapy programs for animals, without hereby inducing the appearance of typical allergic/inflammatory symptoms. In order to verify the response of animals submitted to intranasal administration of pollen grains, another set of experiments was performed, as shown in the tables below. 
       Example 5 
     Immune Response of Rats Submitted to Two Consecutive Intranasal Instillations 
       [0025]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 8 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 saline solution (as a control, 50 μL per nostril per animal) in 
               
               
                 two consecutive exposures with an interval of one week between 
               
               
                 each exposure. The chart shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar 
               
               
                 lavage of normal animals, 4 hours after the last instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 cont. 
                 cont. 
                 cont. 
                 thousands 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 74 
                 73 
                 9 
                 18 
                 1351 
                 167 
                 333 
               
               
                 2 
                 28 
                 89 
                 0.5 
                 10.5 
                 623 
                 4 
                 74 
               
               
                 3 
                 45 
                 99 
                 1 
                 0 
                 1114 
                 11 
                 0 
               
               
                 4 
                 26 
                 30 
                 0 
                 70 
                 195 
                 0 
                 455 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 820.6 
                 45.3 
                 215.4 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 515.5 
                 80.9 
                 214.3 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 297.6 
                 46.7 
                 123.7 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 9 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 5 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril per animal) in two consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with an interval of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage 4 hours after 
               
               
                 the last intranasal instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 127.5 
                 54 
                 23 
                 23 
                 1721 
                 701 
                 765 
               
               
                 2 
                 64 
                 70 
                 0 
                 30 
                 1120 
                 0 
                 480 
               
               
                 3 
                 81 
                 71 
                 0 
                 29 
                 1438 
                 0 
                 587 
               
               
                 4 
                 41 
                 97 
                 0 
                 3 
                 994 
                 0 
                 31 
               
               
                 5 
                 38.5 
                 85 
                 0 
                 15 
                 818 
                 0 
                 144 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1218.3 
                 140.3 
                 401.5 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 360.9 
                 313.6 
                 306.7 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 180.5 
                 156.8 
                 153.4 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 10 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 50 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril per animal) in two consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with an interval of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage 4 hours after 
               
               
                 the last intranasal instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 223 
                 46 
                 0 
                 54 
                 2565 
                 0 
                 3011 
               
               
                 2 
                 147 
                 62 
                 1 
                 38 
                 2279 
                 37 
                 1397 
               
               
                 3 
                 37 
                 95 
                 0 
                 5 
                 879 
                 0 
                 46 
               
               
                 4 
                 30 
                 97 
                 0 
                 3 
                 728 
                 0 
                 23 
               
               
                 5 
                 68 
                 100 
                 0 
                 0 
                 1700 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1629.9 
                 7.4 
                 895.2 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 943.7 
                 18.4 
                 1323.8 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 409.1 
                 8.2 
                 661.9 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 11 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 500 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril per animal) in two consecutive exposures with 
               
               
                 an interval of one week between each exposure. The chart shows 
               
               
                 the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage 4 hours after the last 
               
               
                 intranasal instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 68.5 
                 70 
                 0 
                 30 
                 1199 
                 0 
                 514 
               
               
                 2 
                 48 
                 77 
                 0 
                 23 
                 924 
                 0 
                 276 
               
               
                 3 
                 86 
                 62 
                 0 
                 38 
                 1333 
                 0 
                 817 
               
               
                 4 
                 135 
                 62.5 
                 0 
                 37.5 
                 2109 
                 0 
                 1266 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1391.3 
                 0 
                 718.1 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 508.1 
                 0 
                 426.9 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 293.3 
                 0 
                 246.5 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       Example 6 
     Immune Response of Rats Submitted to Three Consecutive Intranasal Instillations 
       [0026]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 12 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 saline solution (as a control, 50 μg per nostril, per animal) in 
               
               
                 three consecutive exposures with an interval of one week between 
               
               
                 each exposure. The chart shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar 
               
               
                 lavage of normal animals. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 49 
                 83 
                 0 
                 17 
                 1017 
                 0 
                 208 
               
               
                 2 
                 35 
                 96 
                 0 
                 4 
                 840 
                 0 
                 35 
               
               
                 3 
                 69 
                 59 
                 0 
                 41 
                 1018 
                 0 
                 707 
               
               
                 4 
                 47 
                 84 
                 0 
                 6 
                 987 
                 0 
                 71 
               
               
                 5 
                 58 
                 57 
                 0 
                 43 
                 827 
                 0 
                 624 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 937.6 
                 0 
                 328.9 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 96.2 
                 0 
                 315.3 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 48.1 
                 0 
                 157.6 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 13 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 5 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with an interval of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage 4 hours after 
               
               
                 the last intranasal instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 cont. 
                 cont. 
                 cont. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 79 
                 53 
                 0 
                 47 
                 1047 
                 0 
                 928 
               
               
                 2 
                 60 
                 60 
                 4 
                 36 
                 900 
                 60 
                 540 
               
               
                 3 
                 53.6 
                 31 
                 0 
                 69 
                 415 
                 0 
                 925 
               
               
                 4 
                 103 
                 62 
                 0 
                 38 
                 1597 
                 0 
                 979 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 989.7 
                 15 
                 842.8 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 486.3 
                 30 
                 203.4 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 280.7 
                 17.3 
                 117.4 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 14 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 50 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with an interval of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage 4 hours after 
               
               
                 the last intranasal instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 119 
                 37 
                 0 
                 63 
                 1101 
                 0 
                 1874 
               
               
                 2 
                 93 
                 88 
                 0 
                 12 
                 2046 
                 0 
                 279 
               
               
                 3 
                 66 
                 97 
                 0 
                 3 
                 1601 
                 0 
                 50 
               
               
                 4 
                 86 
                 77 
                 3 
                 20 
                 1656 
                 65 
                 430 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1600.7 
                 16.1 
                 658.2 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 387.8 
                 32.3 
                 825.7 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 223.9 
                 18.6 
                 476.7 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 15 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Intranasal instillation of 
               
               
                 500 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (in saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with an interval of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage 4 hours after the 
               
               
                 last intranasal instillation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
                 Thous. 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 83 
                 50 
                 0 
                 50 
                 1038 
                 0 
                 1038 
               
               
                 2 
                 90 
                 82 
                 0 
                 18 
                 1845 
                 0 
                 405 
               
               
                 3 
                 104 
                 98 
                 0 
                 2 
                 2548 
                 0 
                 52 
               
               
                 4 
                 53 
                 47 
                 0 
                 53 
                 623 
                 0 
                 702 
               
               
                 5 
                 45 
                 66 
                 0 
                 34 
                 743 
                 0 
                 383 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1359.2 
                 0 
                 515.9 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 817.8 
                 0 
                 371.5 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 408.9 
                 0 
                 185.8 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0027]    The results of tables 12-15 show that in none of the tested conditions a statistically significant alteration of the cell counts in broncho-alveolar lavage occurred, indicating that the administration of pollen grains under these conditions does not induce detectable allergic-type inflammatory response. In view of these results, a new set of experiments was conducted involving a larger number of animals and higher concentrations of pollen grains. These results are also presented in  FIG. 3 , panels A, B and C, respectively, which clearly show that there was no statistically significant alteration of the cell counts in pleural lavage under the consecutive administration conditions of 5, 50 and 500 μg of pollen grains. 
       Example 7 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Subcutaneous Injection, Followed by a “Booster”—Challenge with 10 μg of Pollen Grains in the Pleural Cavity 
       [0028]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 16 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. The chart shows the cell 
               
               
                 counts in pleural lavage of normal animals, which were not submitted 
               
               
                 to any program of sensitizing or challenge. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 39 
                 87 
                 12 
                 1 
                 11.5 
                 1.6 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 2 
                 34 
                 81 
                 19 
                 0 
                 8.3 
                 1.9 
                 0 
               
               
                 3 
                 26 
                 89 
                 11 
                 0 
                 7.4 
                 0.9 
                 0 
               
               
                 4 
                 33 
                 77 
                 23 
                 0 
                 7.6 
                 2.3 
                 0 
               
               
                 5 
                 40 
                 86 
                 13 
                 1 
                 11.7 
                 1.8 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 9.3 
                 1.70 
                 0.05 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 2.13 
                 0.51 
                 0.07 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.07 
                 0.25 
                 0.04 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 17 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Saline solution subcutaneous 
               
               
                 injection (according control, 100 μL per animal), followed by a 
               
               
                 booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The chart shows the cell 
               
               
                 counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure (7 days after the 
               
               
                 booster, that is, on the 14 th  day) through intrapleural injection of 10 μg 
               
               
                 of pollen grains in a volume of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 29 
                 67 
                 33 
                 0 
                 6.6 
                 3.3 
                 0 
               
               
                 2 
                 53 
                 24 
                 5 
                 71 
                 3.9 
                 0.8 
                 11.7 
               
               
                 3 
                 39 
                 63 
                 36 
                 1 
                 7.4 
                 4.2 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 5.97 
                 2.76 
                 3.93 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.8 
                 1.75 
                 6.70 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.27 
                 1.24 
                 4.74 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 18 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 50 μg 
               
               
                 of wild tobacco - WT - pollen grains (100 μL per animal, in saline 
               
               
                 solution), followed by a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. 
               
               
                 The chart shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the 
               
               
                 procedure (7 days after the booster, that is, on the 14 th  day) 
               
               
                 through intrapleural injection of 10 μg of pollen grains in a 
               
               
                 volume of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 31 
                 51 
                 35.5 
                 13.5 
                 6 
                 4.2 
                 1.6 
               
               
                 2 
                 24 
                 80 
                 17.5 
                 2.5 
                 6.1 
                 1.3 
                 0.2 
               
               
                 3 
                 29 
                 63 
                 30.5 
                 6.5 
                 5.5 
                 2.7 
                 0.6 
               
               
                 4 
                 26 
                 50 
                 46 
                 4 
                 3.9 
                 3.3 
                 0.6 
               
               
                 5 
                 28 
                 82 
                 14 
                 4 
                 7.3 
                 1.3 
                 0.4 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 5.78 
                 2.54 
                 0.67 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.25 
                 1.26 
                 0.54 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.63 
                 0.63 
                 0.27 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 19 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 500 μg of wild tobacco - WT - pollen grains (100 μL per animal, 
               
               
                 in saline solution), followed by a booster in the same conditions after 
               
               
                 7 days. The chart shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after 
               
               
                 the procedure (7 days after the booster, that is, on the 14 th  day) 
               
               
                 through intrapleural injection of 10 μg 
               
               
                 of pollen grains in a volume of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 48 
                 49 
                 6 
                 45 
                 8 
                 0.98 
                 7.34 
               
               
                 2 
                 47 
                 53 
                 10 
                 37 
                 8.97 
                 1.69 
                 6.26 
               
               
                 3 
                 61 
                 76 
                 5 
                 19 
                 14.8 
                 0.98 
                 3.71 
               
               
                 4 
                 33 
                 89 
                 10 
                 1 
                 8.8 
                 0.99 
                 0.10 
               
               
                 5 
                 41 
                 62 
                 3 
                 35 
                 8.6 
                 0.42 
                 4.88 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 9.85 
                 1.01 
                 4.46 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 2.81 
                 0.45 
                 2.80 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.41 
                 0.23 
                 1.40 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 20 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 50 μg of wild tobacco - WT - pollen grains (100 μL per animal, 
               
               
                 in saline solution with 5 mg of alumminum hydroxide as adjuvant), 
               
               
                 followed by a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure 
               
               
                 (7 days after the booster, that is, on the 14 th  day) 
               
               
                 through intrapleural injection of 10 μg of pollen grains in a volume 
               
               
                 of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 49 
                 77 
                 8 
                 15 
                 13.58 
                 1.41 
                 2.65 
               
               
                 2 
                 23 
                 76 
                 17 
                 7 
                 5.94 
                 1.33 
                 0.55 
               
               
                 3 
                 49 
                 73 
                 13 
                 14 
                 11.09 
                 1.97 
                 2.13 
               
               
                 4 
                 33 
                 82 
                 15 
                 3 
                 8.12 
                 1.49 
                 0.30 
               
               
                 5 
                 56 
                 56 
                 15 
                 29 
                 9.41 
                 2.52 
                 4.87 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 9.63 
                 1.74 
                 2.10 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 2.90 
                 0.50 
                 1.85 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.45 
                 0.25 
                 0.92 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 21 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 500 μg of wild tobacco - WT - pollen grains (100 μL per animal, 
               
               
                 in saline solution with 5 mg of aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant), 
               
               
                 followed by a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The chart 
               
               
                 shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure 
               
               
                 (7 days after the booster, that is, on the 14 th  day) through 
               
               
                 intrapleural injection of 10 μg of pollen grains in a volume of 
               
               
                 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 47 
                 67 
                 2 
                 31 
                 11.34 
                 0.34 
                 5.25 
               
               
                 2 
                 94 
                 62 
                 5 
                 33 
                 22.15 
                 1.79 
                 11.79 
               
               
                 3 
                 32 
                 68 
                 3 
                 29 
                 6.96 
                 0.31 
                 3 
               
               
                 4 
                 56 
                 69 
                 4 
                 27 
                 12.36 
                 0.72 
                 4.84 
               
               
                 5 
                 52 
                 71 
                 18 
                 11 
                 11.08 
                 2.81 
                 1.72 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 12.78 
                 1.19 
                 5.31 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 5.63 
                 1.08 
                 3.89 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 2.81 
                 0.54 
                 1.95 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       Example 8 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Subcutaneous Injection, Followed by a “Booster”—Challenge with 20 μg of Pollen Grains in the Pleural Cavity 
       [0029]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 22 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 saline solution (according to control 100 μL per animal), followed 
               
               
                 by a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The chart shows 
               
               
                 the cell counts in pleural lavage of normal animals, which were not 
               
               
                 subjected to any program of sensitizing or challenge. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 15 
                 89 
                 11 
                 0 
                 4.3 
                 0.5 
                 0 
               
               
                 2 
                 25 
                 84 
                 16 
                 0 
                 6.3 
                 1.2 
                 0 
               
               
                 3 
                 14 
                 71 
                 25 
                 4 
                 3.2 
                 1.1 
                 0.2 
               
               
                 4 
                 21 
                 88 
                 12 
                 0 
                 5.9 
                 0.8 
                 0 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 4.92 
                 0.91 
                 0.04 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.45 
                 0.31 
                 0.09 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.84 
                 0.18 
                 0.05 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 23 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 saline solution (according to control 100 μL per animal), followed by 
               
               
                 a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The chart shows the cell 
               
               
                 counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the procedure (7 days after the 
               
               
                 booster, that is, on the 14 th  day) through intrapleural injection of 
               
               
                 20 μg of pollen in a volume of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 34 
                 69 
                 31 
                 0 
                 7.0 
                 3.2 
                 0 
               
               
                 2 
                 21 
                 81 
                 18 
                 1 
                 5.3 
                 1.3 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 3 
                 48 
                 87 
                 11 
                 2 
                 13.2 
                 1.8 
                 0.3 
               
               
                 4 
                 28 
                 65 
                 31 
                 4 
                 5.8 
                 2.8 
                 0.4 
               
               
                 5 
                 12 
                 78 
                 20 
                 2 
                 3 
                 0.8 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 6.88 
                 1.98 
                 0.16 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 3.83 
                 0.99 
                 0.16 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.92 
                 0.50 
                 0.08 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 24 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 50 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (100 μL per animal, in a 
               
               
                 saline solution with 5 mg of aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant), 
               
               
                 followed by a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The 
               
               
                 chart shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the 
               
               
                 procedure through intrapleural injection of 20 μg of pollen grains 
               
               
                 in a volume of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 22 
                 78 
                 21 
                 1 
                 5.5 
                 1.5 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 2 
                 40 
                 71.5 
                 26.5 
                 2 
                 8.6 
                 3.2 
                 0.2 
               
               
                 3 
                 16 
                 78 
                 21 
                 1 
                 4.2 
                 1.1 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 4 
                 19 
                 88 
                 12 
                 0 
                 5.7 
                 0.8 
                 0 
               
               
                 5 
                 19 
                 81 
                 10 
                 9 
                 5.2 
                 0.6 
                 0.6 
               
               
                 6 
                 24 
                 75 
                 17 
                 8 
                 5.9 
                 1.3 
                 0.6 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 12.96 
                 1.43 
                 0.26 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 6.17 
                 0.92 
                 0.28 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 2.76 
                 0.41 
                 0.12 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 25 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Subcutaneous injection of 
               
               
                 100 μg of wild tobacco pollen grains (100 μL per animal, in 
               
               
                 saline solution with 5 mg of aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant), 
               
               
                 followed by a booster in the same conditions after 7 days. The 
               
               
                 chart shows the cell counts in pleural lavage 4 hours after the 
               
               
                 procedure through intrapleural injection of 20 μg of pollen grains 
               
               
                 in a volume of 100 μL of saline solution per animal. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 32 
                 81 
                 16 
                 3 
                 8.81 
                 1.74 
                 0.33 
               
               
                 2 
                 15 
                 80.5 
                 19 
                 0.5 
                 4.11 
                 0.97 
                 0.03 
               
               
                 3 
                 19 
                 84 
                 15 
                 1 
                 5.11 
                 0.91 
                 0.06 
               
               
                 4 
                 27 
                 69 
                 27 
                 4 
                 5.96 
                 2.33 
                 0.35 
               
               
                 5 
                 23.25 
                 78 
                 22 
                 0 
                 6.89 
                 1.9 
                 0 
               
               
                 6 
                 23.25 
                 80 
                 9 
                 11 
                 6.32 
                 0.7 
                 0.87 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 6.20 
                 1.43 
                 0.27 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.61 
                 0.66 
                 0.33 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.72 
                 0.29 
                 0.15 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       Example 9 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Subcutaneous Injection of Pollen Grains, Followed by a Booster—Challenge Through Subplantar Injection of 20 μg of Pollen Grains 
       [0030]    Two groups of animals were subjected to a subcutaneous injection (100 μL per animal) of pollen grain suspensions in the following conditions: 
         [0000]    1—Subcutaneous injection of 50 μg of pollen grains in a saline solution and aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant (5 mg per animal); and
 
2—Subcutaneous injection of 100 μg of pollen grains in a saline solution and aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant (5 mg per animal).
 
         [0031]    One week after these subcutaneous injections (day 7) the groups of animals were subjected to a new subcutaneous injection (booster) in the same respective pollen grain concentrations, but without an adjuvant. After one week (day 14), all animal groups were challenged by sub plantar injection (50 μL) of 20 μg suspensions of pollen grains. There was no appearance of edemas on the sole of the paws/feet in any of the evaluated conditions. 
       Example 10 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Intranasal Instillation of Pollen Grains, Followed by a Booster—Challenge Through Subplantar Injection of 20 μg of Pollen Grains 
       [0032]    Four groups of animals were subjected to an intranasal instillation (50 μL per nostril) of pollen grain suspensions under the following conditions: 
         [0000]    1—Intranasal instillation of 50 μg of pollen grains in saline solution;
 
2—Intranasal instillation of 25 μg of pollen grains in saline solution;
 
3—Intranasal instillation of 50 μg of pollen grains in saline solution and aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant (5 mg per animal); and
 
04—Intranasal instillation of 25 μg of pollen grains in saline solution and aluminum hydroxide as adjuvant (5 mg per animal).
 
         [0033]    One week after these nasal instillations (day 7) the animal groups were subjected to another intranasal administration (booster) with the same respective concentrations of pollen grains, but without adjuvants. After one week (day 14), all animal groups were challenged by a sub plantar injection (50 μL) of suspensions of 20 μg of pollen grains. There was no occurrence of paw/feet edemas in any of the evaluated conditions. 
       Example 11 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Consecutive Intranasal Instillations with WT and GM Tobacco Pollen Grains 
       [0034]    Groups of animals were subjected to intranasal instillations (50 μL per nostril) of wild pollen (WT) suspensions or transgenic pollen suspensions (GM—whose pollen grains contain the GUS protein) in the concentrations of 0, 5 and 50 total pollen μg per animal. Three instillations were performed with intervals of 7 days, after which a broncho-alveolar washing as well as a cellular counting was performed 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 26 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Nasal instillation of a saline 
               
               
                 solution (control of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive 
               
               
                 exposures with intervals of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 presents the cell counts in lavage broncho-alveolar 4 hours after the 
               
               
                 last instillation under the above-described conditions. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 7 
                 70 
                 0 
                 30 
                 0.123 
                 0 
                 0.053 
               
               
                 2 
                 6 
                 96 
                 0 
                 4 
                 0.144 
                 0 
                 0.006 
               
               
                 3 
                 10 
                 60 
                 0 
                 40 
                 0.15 
                 0 
                 0.1 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.138 
                 0 
                 0.053 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.014 
                 0 
                 0.047 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.01 
                 0 
                 0.033 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 27 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Nasal instillation of 5 μg 
               
               
                 of wild tobacco pollen grains - WT - (in a saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with intervals of one week between each exposure. The chart 
               
               
                 presents the cell counts in lavage broncho-alveolar 4 
               
               
                 hours after the last instillation under the above-described conditions. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 54 
                 51 
                 0 
                 49 
                 0.689 
                 0 
                 0.662 
               
               
                 2 
                 50 
                 48 
                 0 
                 52 
                 0.6 
                 0 
                 0.65 
               
               
                 3 
                 27 
                 55 
                 0 
                 45 
                 0.371 
                 0 
                 0.304 
               
               
                 4 
                 28 
                 43 
                 0 
                 57 
                 0.301 
                 0 
                 0.399 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.49 
                 0 
                 0.503 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.184 
                 0 
                 0.18 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.106 
                 0 
                 0.104 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 28 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Nasal instillation of 5 μg 
               
               
                 of transgenic tobacco pollen grains - GM - (in a saline solution, 
               
               
                 instillation of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive 
               
               
                 exposures with intervals of one week between each exposure. 
               
               
                 The chart presents the cell counts in lavage broncho-alveolar 
               
               
                 4 hours after the last instillation under the above-described conditions. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 48 
                 30 
                 0 
                 70 
                 0.36 
                 0 
                 0.84 
               
               
                 2 
                 29 
                 58 
                 0 
                 42 
                 0.421 
                 0 
                 0.305 
               
               
                 3 
                 75 
                 37 
                 1 
                 62 
                 0.694 
                 0.019 
                 1.163 
               
               
                 4 
                 39 
                 63 
                 0 
                 37 
                 0.614 
                 0 
                 0.361 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.522 
                 0.005 
                 0.667 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.157 
                 0.009 
                 0.408 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.091 
                 0.005 
                 0.236 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 29 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Nasal instillation of 50 μg 
               
               
                 of wild tobacco pollen grains - WT - (in a saline solution, instillation 
               
               
                 of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive exposures 
               
               
                 with intervals of one week between each exposure. The chart presents 
               
               
                 the cell counts in lavage broncho-alveolar 4 hours after the last 
               
               
                 instillation under the above-described conditions. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 172 
                 4 
                 0 
                 96 
                 0.172 
                 0 
                 4.128 
               
               
                 2 
                 24 
                 51 
                 0 
                 49 
                 0.306 
                 0 
                 0.294 
               
               
                 3 
                 109 
                 20 
                 0 
                 80 
                 0.545 
                 0 
                 2.180 
               
               
                 4 
                 39 
                 66 
                 0 
                 34 
                 0.644 
                 0 
                 0.332 
               
               
                 5 
                 104 
                 56 
                 0 
                 44 
                 1.456 
                 0 
                 1.144 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.624 
                 0 
                 1.615 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.216 
                 0 
                 1.6 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.25 
                 0 
                 0.8 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 30 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Experimental conditions of pollen grain exposure to  R. novergicus   
               
               
                 Wistar rats and their respective results. Nasal instillation of 50 μg 
               
               
                 of transgenic tobacco pollen grains - GM - (in a saline solution, 
               
               
                 instillation of 50 μL per nostril, per animal) in three consecutive 
               
               
                 exposures with intervals of one week between each exposure. 
               
               
                 The chart presents the cell counts in lavage broncho-alveolar 
               
               
                 4 hours after the last instillation under the above-described conditions. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CAM 
                 Mono 
                   
                 Neut 
                 Mono 
                 Eos 
                 Neut 
               
               
                 N 
                 Leu tot 
                 % 
                 Eos % 
                 % 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
                 Millions 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                 31 
                 92 
                 0 
                 8 
                 0.713 
                 0 
                 0.062 
               
               
                 2 
                 65 
                 70 
                 0 
                 30 
                 1.138 
                 0 
                 0.488 
               
               
                 3 
                 22 
                 44 
                 3 
                 53 
                 0.242 
                 0.02 
                 0.292 
               
               
                 4 
                 40 
                 48 
                 0 
                 52 
                 0.480 
                 0 
                 0.52 
               
               
                 5 
                 35 
                 55 
                 0 
                 45 
                 0.481 
                 0 
                 0.394 
               
               
                 Average 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.610 
                 0.003 
                 0.351 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.338 
                 0.007 
                 0.184 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 0.169 
                 0.004 
                 0.092 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0035]    The results of tables 26-30 are better visualized in  FIG. 3 , panels D-F, and indicate that in none of the pollen grain concentrations administered by intranasal means any significant alteration in the cell counts (which would be typical of allergic-inflammatory reactions) occurred. The statistically significant difference among the mononuclear cells and neutrophil counts after the administration of pollen grains WT and GM ( FIG. 3 , panels D and E) is surprising and favorable in regard to the present invention&#39;s purposes, since it demonstrates that the pollen grains with modified composition (GM), when used in concentrations of 50 μg, would have less potential to induce inflammation in the broncho-alveolar cavity than wild tobacco pollen grains (WT). 
       Example 12 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Different Programs of Pollen Grain Administration—Measurement of the Total Seric IgG Through ELISA 
       [0036]    Table 31 shows the seric IgG concentration data of the animals subjected to the conditions described in Example 6, tables 12-15. 
         [0000]                                                                TABLE 31                   Concentration data of the total seric IgG, in μg/mL, in serum       samples of animals subjected to three consecutive intranasal       administrations, with an interval of one week between each       application of wild type tobacco pollen grain (WT) suspensions       in different concentrations.                Saline   WT   WT   WT       Animal   solution   5 μg   50 μg   500 μg                    1   1125.6   1441.5   1123.3   1012.7       2   1367   1337.7   1459.5   1461.8       3   1376   1084.9   1414.4   1152.6       4   1545.3   836.7   1511.4   918       5   1504.6           1015       6               1488.9       N   5   4   4   6       Average   1383.7   1175.2   1377.2   1174.8       Deviation   164.1   270.8   173.8   244.7       E.P.M.   82.0   156.4   100.4   109.4                    
Table 32 shows the seric IgG concentration data of the animals subjected to the conditions described in Example 7, tables 16 and 19-21.
 
         [0000]                                                                TABLE 32                   Concentration data of the total seric IgG, in μg/mL, in serum       samples of animals subjected to an intrapleural injection with       different concentrations of wild type tobacco pollen grains (WT),       with or without adjuvant (AlOH 3 ), followed by a booster one       week later, under the same conditions and challenge, and, one       week thereafter by an intrapleural injection of 10 μg of       pollen grains.                Saline       50 μg +   500 μg +       Animal   solution   500 μg   AlOH 3     AlOH 3                      1   942.8   956.3   981.1   951.8       2   807.4   665.2   906.7   1037.5       3   1024   836.7   678.8   1367       4   784.8   884.1   1100.7   960.8       5           954.1   1673.9       N   4   4   5   5       Average   889.8   835.6   924.3   1198.2       Deviation   113.5   123.8   154.8   315.3       E.P.M.   65.5   71.5   77.4   157.7                    
Table 33 shows the seric IgG concentration data of the animals subjected to the conditions described in Example 11, tables 26-30.
 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 33 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Concentration data of the total seric IgG, in μg/mL, in serum 
               
               
                 samples of animals subjected to 3 (three) consecutive intranasal 
               
               
                 administrations, with an interval of one week between each application 
               
               
                 of wild type tobacco pollen grain (WT) suspensions or genetically 
               
               
                 modified (GM) in different concentrations. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Saline 
                 WT 
                 WT 
                 GM 
                 GM 
               
               
                 Animal 
                 solution 
                 5 μg 
                 50 μg 
                 5 μg 
                 50 μg 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 1 
                   
                 1098.5 
                 1069.1 
                 967.6 
                 523.1 
               
               
                 2 
                 1130.1 
                 1457.3 
                 1247.4 
                 1062.4 
                 784.8 
               
               
                 3 
                 1470.8 
                 1078.2 
                 931.5 
                 1299.3 
                 978.9 
               
               
                 4 
                 1283.5 
                 1367 
                 958.6 
                 1048.8 
                 893.1 
               
               
                 5 
                 1479.8 
                 723.9 
                 1103 
                   
                 744.2 
               
               
                 N 
                 4 
                 5 
                 5 
                 4 
                 5 
               
               
                 Average 
                 1341.1 
                 1145.0 
                 1061.9 
                 1094.5 
                 784.8 
               
               
                 Deviation 
                 167.2 
                 287.6 
                 126.3 
                 142.8 
                 172.9 
               
               
                 E.P.M. 
                 96.6 
                 143.8 
                 63.2 
                 82.4 
                 86.4 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       Example 13 
     Analysis of the Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Consecutive Subcutaneous Injections of Pollen Grains, Recognized as Allergens ( Betula fontinallis ) 
       [0037]    Aiming to subject the animals to conditions in which a inflammatory and/or allergic response would be more likely, so as to eliminate the hypothesis that the animals utilized in the tests would not be responsive, new trials were conceived with the use of pollen grains reported in literature to be associated with allergic events (Ahlholm et al, “Genetic and Environmental Factors Affecting the Allergenicity of Birch ( Betula pubescens  ssp.  czerepanovii  [Orl.] Hamet-ahti) Pollen”  Clin. Exp. Allergy  28:1384-1388, 1998). In this sense, the pollen grains of  Betula fontinallis  were commercially acquired and utilized in experiments with rats as follows: 
         [0038]    Groups of 5 (five) animals were subjected to the exposure of pollen grains in the following conditions: 
       Group 1—Subcutaneous Injection (100 μL per Animal): 
       [0000]    
       
         
           
               Betula  pollen suspension (100 μg/animal) in saline solution; 
               Betula  pollen suspension (100 μg/animal) in saline solution+Al(OH) 3  (5 mg/animal); and 
             Wild tobacco pollen suspension—WT (100 μg/animal) in saline solution+Al(OH) 3  (5 mg/animal). 
           
         
       
     
       Group 2—Instillation (50 μL per Nostril): 
       [0000]    
       
         
           
               Betula  pollen suspension (100 μg/animal) in saline solution+Al(OH) 3  (5 mg/animal). 
           
         
       
     
         [0043]    After eight (8) weeks of consecutive exposures under the above-described conditions, Group 1 was subjected to a challenge, by injection into the footpad, of 50 μg of pollen grain suspension (50 μL) and measurement of the animal&#39;s feet volume in a plethysmograph. The results of Table 34 indicate the occurrence of edemas in the animals subjected to subcutaneous injections of WT tobacco pollen and, to a lesser degree, with  Betula  pollen. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 34 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 The volumes, in ml, of the right (control) and the left paws/feet 
               
               
                 (challenge) were measured in a plethysmograph. The rats were 
               
               
                 subjected to 8 (eight) consecutive subcutaneous injections with 
               
               
                 pollen grains under the above-described conditions, followed by 
               
               
                 a challenge through a sub plantar injection of 50 μg of pollen 
               
               
                 grain suspension (50 μL per paw). The presented averages 
               
               
                 represent the volume differences between the left and right paws. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Tobacco WT + 
                   
                   Betula  in 
                   
                   Betula  + 
                   
               
               
                   
                 Al(OH) 3   
                   
                 saline solution 
                   
                 Al(OH) 3   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Right 
                 Left 
                 Right 
                 Left 
                 Right 
                 Left 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 1.23 
                 1.79 
                 1.29 
                 1.54 
                 1.24 
                 1.36 
               
               
                   
                 1.23 
                 1.80 
                 1.35 
                 1.58 
                 1.38 
                 1.28 
               
               
                   
                 1.30 
                 1.75 
                 1.28 
                 1.48 
                 1.31 
                 1.34 
               
               
                   
                 1.20 
                 1.30 
                   
                   
                 1.40 
                 1.42 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1.32 
                 1.29 
               
               
                   
                 Average 
                 0.420 
                   
                 0.227 
                   
                 0.008 
               
               
                   
                 Deviation 
                 0.220 
                   
                 0.025 
                   
                 0.081 
               
               
                   
                 E.P.M. 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0044]    After eight consecutive weeks of nasal instillations in the animals of Group 2, broncho-alveolar lavages were used to count the cells under the above-described conditions. The cell counts indicated that there was no change in relation to the control animals. Taken together these results point to the following conclusions: (i) the allergic response to subcutaneously injected pollen grains only occurs after an elevated number of consecutive exposures and tends to be higher in the absence of an adjuvant; (ii) it was not possible to detect typical alterations of allergic responses in any of the nasal instillation conditions in rats. Since edemas indeed occurred under the subcutaneous injection condition (with WT tobacco pollen and also with  Betula  pollen) and the absence of typical allergic alterations through instillation in all of the conditions evaluated in the present invention, the results indicate that there seems to be a relation between the antigen presentation route and the pattern of response. 
       Example 14 
     Immune Response of Rats Subjected to Different Programs of Pollen Grains Administration—Detection of Specific Seric IgG Against of Pollen Grain Proteins Through Western Blot 
       [0045]    The formation of specific seric IgG against pollen grain proteins was monitored through Western Blot, in which total extracts of pollen WT (wild) and GM (containing the GUS enzyme) proteins were separated through electrophoresis, followed by the transference of the bands to a nitrocellulose membrane. The serum of the animals subjected to three consecutive instillations, in intervals of one week each, with pollen WT or GM, in pool, were then incubated separately, with said membrane (previously cut into pieces to allow the separation of the samples), which, after being washed, was incubated in the presence of secondary anti-rat IgG antibodies marked with alkaline phosphatase. The colorimetrical reaction with adequate substrates indicated the detection of specific IgG&#39;s against pollen grain proteins. As shown on Table 35, the serum of the animals instilled with tobacco pollen grains “WT” and also in the serum of the animals instilled with tobacco pollen grains “GM” revealed the presence of IgG type antibodies specific against proteins of said pollen grains. Taken together, the results of these experiments point to the feasibility of the use of pollen grains as modulators of the immune response in mammals. More specifically, the results point to the feasibility of the use of whole pollen grains as stimulators of protective response (formation of specific seric IgG against pollen grain proteins) in mammals. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 35 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Detection, through Western Blot, of specific seric IgG against 
               
               
                 proteins from tobacco pollen grains WT and GM. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Condition of 
               
               
                   
                 exposure 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Saline 
                 Pollen WT 
                 Pollen GM 
                 Pollen GM 
               
               
                   
                 solution 
                 5 μg 
                 5 μg 
                 50 μg 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 seric IgG 
                 − 
                 + 
                 + 
                 − 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0046]    The approach using pollen grains has, besides other advantages mentioned in the present invention, the important characteristic of requiring very small amounts of vegetal material for immunization. The results of Table 35 show the formation of specific seric IgG against proteins present in pollen grains after three (3) administrations of 5 μg of pollen grains. Even though no study was so far performed in order to define the minimum amounts necessary to induce the immune response observed on Table 35, the present results offer a reasonable base to estimate the amount of pollen grains that would be necessary for the immunization in other species, such as humans. It is known that the human immune system is considered to be from 100 to 1.000 times more sensitive than that of murines, which means that, by maintaining the proportion between the administered amount and the body weight, just some dozens or hundreds of square meters of cultivation would be sufficient to produce vaccines for entire populations. This allows, among other things, the adoption of simple containment measures in order to decrease biosafety concerns. Further, it is convenient to remember that several other strategies for pollen grain containment are available, such as irradiation, the use of suicidal genes, and infertility barriers. The present invention&#39;s strategy is particularly applicable for animal vaccinations, being also useful to fight epidemics and prevent or remedy situations which might result from the use of biological weapons or terrorist attacks. 
       Example 15 
     Obtaining Genetic Constructions for the Transformation of Plants Destined to Produce Pollen Grains with Heterologous Polypeptides on Their External Surface 
       [0047]    In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the presence of heterologous polypeptides on the external surface of pollen grains is desirable because it is related to the use of pollen grains in in vitro antigen-antibody type reactions, that is, reactions used for in vitro immune diagnosis. In order to evaluate this applicability,  A. thaliana  plants were transformed with gene constructions which would direct the expression of heterologous polypeptide in a subcellular localization compatible with its presence on the external surface of the pollen grains. 
         [0048]    In order to fulfill these requirements, in one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the coding gene of the heterologous polypeptide in question is translationally fused to the coding sequence of the AtGRP17 gene (SEQ 1), while said fusion is controlled by at least part of the promoter region (SEQ 2) of the AtGRP17, this promoter being able to direct the gene fusion expression in the anther&#39;s tapetum. In order to prepare said gene construction, the following steps were taken: 
         [0000]    For the amplification of the promoter region of the AtGRP17 and its ORF specific oligonucleotides were used: RR1f (5′ATA AAG CTT TTT CTC TGT TTT TGT CCG TGG AAC) and RR2r (5′ATA CCA TGG CAC GTG ATT CGG TGG AAG TCC TGC C). The plasmid pCO27 (described by Oliveira et al “Inflorescence-specific genes from  Arabidopsis thaliana  encoding glycine-rich proteins”.  Plant J.  3:495-507, 1993; Franco et al., “Distal regulatory regions restrict the expression of cis-linked gene to the tapetal cells”.  FEBS Letters  25965:1-6, 2002) was used as target for the amplification, by PCR, of the promoter region and of the AtGRP17 ORF. By using the oligonucleotides RR1f and RR2r the product of amplification ProAtGRP67 ( FIG. 6 ) was obtained and, after cleavage with the enzymes XbaI and NcoI, was linked to plasmid pCambia cleaved with the same enzymes ( FIG. 5 ), thus originating the construction pProAtGRP17_GUSGFP ( FIG. 7 ). 
       Example 16 
     Transformation of  A. thaliana  and Analysis of the Heterologous Polypeptide&#39;s Localization 
       [0049]    The gene construction of the previous example was introduced in  E. coli  and in  Agrobacterium tumefasciens  so as to later transform  A. thaliana . Plant transformation confirmation was performed through the extraction of genomic DNA by methodologies known to skilled in the art and by PCR-mediated amplification of the heterologous regions introduced into the transformed plant. Plant transformation was also confirmed by the expression analysis of GUS enzyme activity in the intented subcellular localiztions, by means of a calorimetric reaction using X-Gluc as substrate and the corresponding blue color formation. Plant tissue samples were observed by stereoscopic and optical microscopy. 
         [0050]    The gene construction ( FIG. 7 ) containing the reporter genes gus and gfp, was introduced in  E. coli  by eletroporation and in  A. tumefasciens  by thermal shock. The cloning was confirmed by the analysis of the expected profile of fragments generated by the digestion with restriction enzymes ( FIG. 8 ).  A. thaliana  inflorescences were inoculated with cultures of  A. tumefasciens  containing said gene construction (transformation technique called “floral dip”, described by Clough &amp; Bent “Floral dip: a Simplified Method for  Agrobacterium -mediated Transformation of  Arabidopsis thaliana” The Plant Journal  16(6):735-743, 1998). The seeds generated after that procedure were collected and sown on plaques containing a selective medium comprising hygromicyn. The plantlets selected from the plaques were transplanted into the soil in phytotron, where they were cultivated in conditions which favor self-fertilization. Analysis of these plants&#39; inflorescences by microscopy ( FIG. 9  A-D) confirmed the presence of GUS activity in the expected subcellular localization (by means of the corresponding colorimetrical reaction described in Example 2). More specifically, the activity of the GUS enzyme was only detected in the later stages of the anther&#39;s development ( FIG. 9  A), and still more specifically on the anther&#39;s tapetum ( FIG. 9  C). 
       Example 17 
     Detection of the Heterologous Polypeptide on the Surface of Pollen Grains 
       [0051]    The transformation of  A. thaliana  plants according to Example 16 resulted in the generation of 11 lineages effectively producing heterologous polypeptides in the pollen grains. Those lineages were cultivated in phytotron and self-polinated so as to allow the later obtention of hundreds of seeds. Seeds of each one of the lineages were sown directly into the soil and the resulting plants were cultivated in phytotron. After inflorescence formation entire flowers were collected in Eppendorf tubes with the help of a scalpel. 100 μL of phosphate buffer 0.1 M pH 7 was added to said tubes, which were then vortexed in order to allow the formation of homogeneum pollen grain suspensions. Afterwards, 1 μL of the X Gluc reagent was added and, 30 minutes at 37° C. thereafter, the presence of the GUS enzyme triggered the formation a blue-colored complex. Fractions of these suspensions were then collected with micropipette and put on glass slides for observation under the microscope. The result of that observation ( FIG. 9  D) indicated the presence of the active heterologous polypeptide (GUS enzyme) in the pollen grain. These results point collectively to the feasibility of the use of whole pollen grains as reagents for immune diagnosis. 
         [0052]    The skilled persons will understand from the present description that any heterologous polypeptide can be produced by the processes of the present invention, including post-translationally modified polypeptides, such as glycosilated proteins and the like. Similarly, combinations of heterologous polypeptides or translational fusions of heterologous polypeptide segments may be produced by the teachings of the present invention, including, but not limiting to, at least part of polypeptides derived from eukaryotic organisms such as mammals including humans, plants, parasites, fungi or derived from procariotic organisms such as bacteria or even viruses, as well as combinations thereof, regardless od being natural or synthetic polypeptides. Therapeutic peptides preferred for the purposes of the present invention include peptidic hormones, cytokines, interleucins, antibodies (and/or fragments thereof) and combinations thereof. The heterologous polypeptides produced by these processes may be used in several immunoreactions, including the immunomodulation of mammals and in vitro immunodiagnostic reactions. The referred immunomodulation may have an immunotherapic, immunoprotective or vaccination purpose, according to the chosen immunogen and/or according the combination of the chosen immunogens.