Abstract:
A method to provide a highly intelligent, automated diagnostic system that identifies the need to replace specific parts to minimize machine downtime rather than require extensive service troubleshooting. In particular, a systematic, logical test analysis scheme to assess machine operation from a simple sensor system and to be able to pinpoint parts and components needing replacement is provided by a series of first level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a first level of data and by a series of second level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a second level of data. Each of the first level tests and first level data is capable of identifying a first level of part failure independent of any other test. Each of the second level tests and second level data is a combination of first level tests and first level data or a combination of a first level test and first level data and a third level test and third level data. The second level tests and second level data are capable of identifying second and third levels of part failure. Codes are stored and displayed to manifest specific part failures.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention relates to analysis of xerographic processes, and more particularly, to the precise determination of failed parts within the xerographic process. 
     As reproduction machines such as copiers and printers become more complex and versatile, the interface between the machine and the service representative must necessarily be expanded if full and efficient trouble shooting of the machine is to be realized. A suitable interface must not only provide the controls, displays, fault codes, and fault histories necessary to monitor and maintain the machine, but must do so in an efficient, relatively simple, and straightforward way. In addition, the machine must be capable of in depth self analysis and either automatic correction or specific identification of part failure to minimize service time. 
     Diagnostic methods often require that a service representative perform an analysis of the problem. For example, problems with paper movement in a machine can occur in different locations and occur because of various machine conditions or failure of various components. In the prior art, this analysis by the service representative has been assisted by recording fault histories in the machine control to be available for readout and analysis. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,817, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, discloses a method for recording and displaying in a finite buffer, called a last  50  fault list, machine faults as well as fault trends or near fault conditions. This data is helpful in diagnosing a machine. It is also known in the prior art, to provide a much larger data log, known as an occurrence log, to record a variety of machine events. 
     In addition U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,817, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, discloses a technique to diagnose a declared machine fault or a suspected machine fault by access to a library of fault analysis information and the option to enter fault codes to display potential machine defects related to the fault codes. It is also known, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,533,193 to save data related to given machine events by selectively setting the control to respond to the occurrence of a given machine fault or event, monitoring the operation of the machine for the occurrence of the given machine event, and initiating the transfer of the data in a buffer to a non-volatile memory. 
     It is also known to be able to monitor the operation of a machine from a remote source by use of a powerful host computer having advanced, high level diagnostic capabilities. These systems have the capability to interact remotely with the machines being monitored to receive automatically initiated or user initiated requests for diagnosis and to interact with the requesting machine to receive stored data to enable higher level diagnostic analysis. Such systems are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,038,319, and 5,057,866 owned by the assignee of the present invention. These systems employ Remote Interactive Communications to enable transfer of selected machine operating data (referred to as machine physical data) to the remote site at which the host computer is located, through a suitable communication channel. The machine physical data may be transmitted from a monitored document system to the remote site automatically at predetermined times and/or response to a specific request from the host computer. 
     The host computer may include a compiler to allow communication with a plurality of different types of machines and an expert diagnostic system that performs higher level analysis of the machine physical data than is available from the diagnostic system in the machine. After analysis, the expert system can provide an instruction message which can be utilized by the machine operator at the site of the document system to overcome a fault. Alternatively, if the expert system determines that more serious repair is necessary or a preventive repair is desirable, a message can be sent to a local field office giving a indication of the type of service action required. 
     Also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,008, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, discloses a technique for remote access and diagnostic manipulation of a machine for improved preparation before making a service call. 
     It is expected that future office products could be serviced by a variety of individuals that could include the customer, representative of product manufactures, or third party service organizations. The service may include parts repair or replacements, adjustments or software updates and should be made as conveniently and readily available as possible. In order to meet this new level of convenient service in an ever complex set of products, it is necessary to provide rapid, easily interpretable information on the status of the machines, to those that are likely to service the product. 
     The use of expert systems discussed above, are also well known in the art. For example, it is known to provide a computer controlled diagnostic apparatus for industrial or other types of operating systems. A rule base pertinent to the particular operating system being diagnosed is stored in memory. The rule base is established by experts in the field to which the diagnosis pertains. Sensors monitor operating parameters of the system and provide output signals which are fed to the diagnostic apparatus. Indications of the overall “health” of the operating system in general and of its components in particular are provided to the user via a display. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 5,138,377 discloses an internal expert system to aid in servicing which monitors predetermined status conditions of the machine for automatic correction or for communication to the user. 
     A difficulty with prior art diagnostic services is the inability to easily and automatically pinpoint the precise parts or subsystems in a machine causing a malfunction or deteriorating condition. It would be much more economical to be able to simply replace a part than to exert significant time and effort trying to correct or repair the part. This is the trend in today&#39;s high tech system environment. It would be desirable, therefore, to provide a highly intelligent, automated diagnostic system that provides an indication of the need to replace specific parts or subsystems rather than the need for extensive service troubleshooting to minimize machine downtime. 
     In copying or printing systems, such as a xerographic copier, laser printer, or inkjet printer, a common technique for monitoring the quality of prints is to artificially create a “test patch” of a predetermined desired density. The actual density of the printing material (toner or ink) in the test patch can then be optically measured to determine the effectiveness of the printing process in placing this printing material on the print sheet. 
     In the case of xerographic devices, such as a laser printer, the surface that is typically of most interest in determining the density of printing material thereon is the charge-retentive surface or photoreceptor, on which the electrostatic latent image is formed and subsequently, developed by causing toner particles to adhere to areas thereof that are charged in a particular way. In such a case, the optical device for determining the density of toner on the test patch, which is often referred to as a toner area coverage sensor or “densitometer”, is disposed along the path of the photoreceptor, directly downstream of the development of the development unit. There is typically a routine within the operating system of the printer to periodically create test patches of a desired density at predetermined locations on the photoreceptor by deliberately causing the exposure system thereof to charge or discharge as necessary the surface at the location to a predetermined extent. 
     The test patch is then moved past the developer unit and the toner particles within the developer unit are caused to adhere to the test patch electrostatically. The denser the toner on the test patch, the darker the test patch will appear in optical testing. The developed test patch is moved past a densitometer disposed along the path of the photoreceptor, and the light absorption of the test patch is tested; the more light that is absorbed by the test patch, the denser the toner on the test patch. Xerographic test patches are traditionally printed in the interdocument zones on the photoreceptor. Generally each patch is about an inch square that is printed as a uniform solid half tone or background area. Thus, the traditional method of process controls involves scheduling solid area, uniform halftones or background in a test patch. Some of the high quality printers contain many test patches. 
     It would be desirable, therefore, to be able to use a simple toner area coverage sensor rather than a complex sensor system to provide machine data to be able to diagnose a machine and identify specific part or subsystem failures or malfunctions. It would also be desirable to provide a systematic, logical test analysis scheme to assess machine operation from a simple sensor system and to be able to pinpoint parts, components, and subsystems needing replacement. 
     It is an object of the present invention, therefore, to maintain uniform development on a photoreceptor surface by initiating a series of halftone test patches over the circumference of the photoreceptor surface and analyzing signals reflected from each of the halftone test patches by comparing the signals to reference signals in order to identify segments of the photoreceptor surface manifesting non-uniformity. Another object of the present invention is to provide a systematic, logical test analysis scheme to assess machine operation from a simple sensor system and to be able to pinpoint parts and components needing replacement. 
     Other advantages of the present invention will become apparent as the following description proceeds, and the features characterizing the invention will be pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of this specification. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention includes a highly intelligent, automated diagnostic system that identifies the need to replace specific parts to minimize machine downtime rather than require extensive service troubleshooting. In particular, a systematic, logical test analysis scheme to assess machine operation from a simple sensor system and to be able to pinpoint parts and components needing replacement is provided by a series of first level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a first level of data and by a series of second level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a second level of data. Each of the first level tests and first level data is capable of identifying a first level of part failure independent of any other test. Each of the second level tests and second level data is a combination of first level tests and first level data or a combination of a first level test and first level data and a third level test and third level data. The second level tests and second level data are capable of identifying second and third levels of part failure. Codes are stored and displayed to manifest specific part failures. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     For a better understanding of the present invention, reference may be had to the accompanying drawings wherein the same reference numerals have been applied to like parts and wherein: 
     FIG. 1 is an elevational view illustrating a typical electronic imaging system incorporating a technique of fault isolation and part replacement in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIG. 2 illustrates the generation of control test patches for use with a toner area coverage sensor; 
     FIG. 3 shows a typical developer and toner dispense system; 
     FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an Expert System adapted for use in the present invention; 
     FIGS. 5A and 5B are a general flow chart illustrating a general technique for fault isolation in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIG. 6 is a more detailed flow chart illustrating the dirt level early warning technique in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIG. 7 is a more detailed flow chart illustrating a ROS beam failure test in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIGS. 8A,  8 B, and  8 C illustrate the cleaner stress indicator in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIGS. 9A and 9B are a more detailed flow chart illustrating actuator performance indicators in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIG. 10 is a more detailed flow chart illustrating the ROS pixel growth detector in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIG. 11 is a more detailed flow chart illustrating the toner dispense monitor in accordance with the present invention; 
     FIG. 12 is a more detailed flow chart showing fault isolation and part replacement in accordance with the present invention; and 
     FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate the use of Expert Systems both locally and remotely for fault isolation and part replacement. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     While the present invention will hereinafter be described in connection with a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents that may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. 
     Turning to FIG. 1, the electrophotographic printing machine  1  employs a belt  10  having a photoconductive surface  12  deposited on a conductive substrate  14 . By way of example, photoconductive surface  12  may be made from a selenium alloy with conductive substrate  14  being made from an aluminum alloy which is electrically grounded. Other suitable photoconductive surfaces and conductive substrates may also be employed. Belt  10  moves in the direction of arrow  16  to advance successive portions of photoconductive surface  12  through the various processing stations disposed about the path of movement thereof. As shown, belt  10  is entrained about rollers  18 ,  20 ,  22 ,  24 . Roller  24  is coupled to motor  26  which drives roller  24  so as to advance belt  10  in the direction of arrow  16 . Rollers  18 ,  20 , and  22  are idler rollers which rotate freely as belt  10  moves in the direction of arrow  16 . 
     Initially, a portion of belt  10  passes through charging station A. At charging station A, a corona generating device, indicated generally by the reference numeral  28  charges a portion of photoconductive surface  12  of belt  10  to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. 
     Next, the charged portion of photoconductive surface  12  is advanced through exposure station B. At exposure station B, a Raster Input Scanner (RIS) and a Raster Output Scanner (ROS) are used to expose the charged portions of photoconductive surface  12  to record an electrostatic latent image thereon. The RIS (not shown), contains document illumination lamps, optics, a mechanical scanning mechanism and photosensing elements such as charged couple device (CCD) arrays. The RIS captures the entire image from the original document and coverts it to a series of raster scan lines. The raster scan lines are transmitted from the RIS to a ROS  36 . 
     ROS  36  illuminates the charged portion of photoconductive surface  12  with a series of horizontal lines with each line having a specific number of pixels per inch. These lines illuminate the charged portion of the photoconductive surface 12 to selectively discharge the charge thereon. An exemplary ROS  36  has lasers with rotating polygon mirror blocks, solid state modulator bars and mirrors. Still another type of exposure system would merely utilize a ROS  36  with the ROS  36  being controlled by the output from an electronic subsystem (ESS) which prepares and manages the image data flow between a computer and the ROS  36 . The ESS (not shown) is the control electronics for the ROS  36  and may be a self-contained, dedicated minicomputer. Thereafter, belt  10  advances the electrostatic latent image recorded on photoconductive surface  12  to development station C. 
     One skilled in the art will appreciate that a light lens system may be used instead of the RIS/ROS system heretofore described. An original document may be positioned face down upon a transparent platen. Lamps would flash light rays onto the original document. The light rays reflected from original document are transmitted through a lens forming a light image thereof. The lens focuses the light image onto the charged portion of photoconductive surface to selectively dissipate the charge thereon. The records an electrostatic latent image on the photoconductive surface which corresponds to the informational areas contained within the original document disposed upon the transparent platen. 
     At development station C, magnetic brush developer system, indicated generally by the reference numeral  38 , transports developer material comprising carrier granules having toner particles adhering triboelectrically thereto into contact with the electrostatic latent image recorded on photoconductive surface  12 . Toner particles are attracted form the carrier granules to the latent image forming a powder image on photoconductive surface  12  of belt  10 . 
     After development, belt  10  advances the toner powder image to transfer station D. At transfer station D a sheet of support material  46  is moved into contact with the toner powder image. Support material  46  is advanced to transfer station D by a sheet feeding apparatus, indicated generally by the reference numeral  48 . Preferably, sheet feeding apparatus  48  includes a feedroll  50  contacting the uppermost sheet of a stack of sheets  52 . Feed roll  50  rotates to advance the uppermost sheet from stack  50  into sheet chute  54 . Chute  54  directs the advancing sheet of support material  46  into a contact with photoconductive surface  12  of belt  10  in a timed sequence so that the toner powder image developed thereon contacts the advancing sheet of support material at transfer station D. 
     Transfer station D includes a corona generating device  56  which sprays ions onto the backside of sheet  46 . This attracts the toner powder image from photoconductive surface  12  to sheet  46 . After transfer, the sheet continues to move in the direction of arrow  58  onto a conveyor  60  which moves the sheet to fusing station E. 
     Fusing station E includes a fuser assembly, indicated generally by the reference numeral  62 , which permanently affixes the powder image to sheet  46 . Preferably, fuser assembly  62  includes a heated fuser roller  64  driven by a motor and a backup roller  66 . Sheet  46  passes between fuser roller  64  and backup roller  66  with the toner powder image contacting fuser roll  64 . In this manner, the toner powder image is permanently affixed to sheet  46 . After fusing, chute  68  guides the advancing sheet to catch tray  70  for subsequent removal from the printing machine by the operator. 
     Invariably, after the sheet of support material is separated from photoconductive surface  12  of belt  10 , some residual particles remain adhering thereto. These residual particles are removed from photoconductive surface  12  at cleaning station F. Cleaning station F includes a preclean corona generating device (not shown) and a rotatably mounted preclean brush  72  in contact with photoconductive surface  12 . The preclean corona generator neutralizes the charge attracting the particles to the photoconductive surface. These particles are cleaned from the photoconductive surface by the rotation of brush  72  in contact therewith. One skilled in the art will appreciate that other cleaning means may be used such as a blade cleaner. Subsequent to cleaning, a discharge lamp (not shown) discharges photoconductive surface  12  with light to dissipate any residual charge remaining thereon prior to the charging thereof for the next successive imaging cycle. 
     A control system coordinates the operation of the various components. In particular, controller  30  responds to sensor  32  and provides suitable actuator control signals to corona generating device  28 , ROS  36 , and development system  38  which can be any suitable development system such as hybrid jumping development or a mag brush development system. The actuator control signals include state variables such as charge voltage, developer bias voltage, exposure intensity and toner concentration. the controller  30  includes an expert system  31  including various logic routines to analyze sensed parameters in a systematic manner and reach conclusions on the state of the machine. Changes in output generated by the controller  30 , in a preferred embodiment, are measured by a toner area coverage (TAC) sensor  32 . TAC sensor  32 , which is located after development station C, measures the developed toner mass for difference area coverage patches recorded on the photoconductive surface  12 . The manner of operation of the TAC sensor  32 , shown in FIG. 1, is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,003 which is hereby incorporated in its entirety into the instant disclosure. TAC sensor  32 , is an infrared reflectance type densitometer that measures the density of toner particles developed on the photoconductive the surface  12 . 
     Referring to FIG. 2, there is illustrated a typical composite toner test patch  110  imaged in the interdocument area of photoconductive surface  12 . The photoconductive surface  12 , is illustrated as containing two documents images image  1  and image  2 . The test patch  110  is shown in the interdocument space between image  1  and image  2  and in that portion of the photoconductive surface  12  sensed by the TAC sensor  32  to provide the necessary signals for control. The composite patch  110 , in a preferred embodiment, measures 15 millimeters, in the process direction, and 45 millimeters, in the cross process direction and provides various halftone level patches such as an 87.5% patch at  118 , a 50% halftone patch at  116  and a 12.5% halftone patch at  114 . 
     Before the TAC sensor  32  can provide a meaningful response to the relative reflectance of patch, the TAC sensor  32  must be calibrated by measuring the light reflected from a bare or clean area portion  112  of photoconductive belt surface  12 . For calibration purposes, current to the light emitting diode (LED) internal to the TAC sensor  32  is increased until the voltage generated by the TAC sensor  32  in response to light reflected from the bare or clean are  112  is between 3 and 5 volts. 
     It should be understood that the term TAC sensor or “densitometer” is intended to apply to any device for determining the density of print material on a surface, such as a visible-light densitometer, an infrared densitometer, an electrostatic voltmeter, or any other such device which makes a physical measurement from which the density of print material may be determined. 
     FIG. 3 shows in greater detail developer unit  38  illustrated in FIG.  1 . The developer unit includes a developer  86  which could be any suitable development system, such as hybrid jumping development or mag brush development, for applying toner to a latent image. The developer is generally provided in a developer housing and the rear of the housing usually forms a sump containing a supply of developing material. A (not shown) passive crossmixer in the sump area generally serves to mix the developing material. 
     The developer  86  is connected to a toner dispense assembly shown at  46  including a toner bottle  88  providing a source of toner particles, an extracting auger  90  for dispensing toner particles from bottle  88 , and hopper  92  receiving toner particles from auger  90 . Hopper  92  is also connected to delivery auger  96  and delivery auger is rotated by drive motor  98  to convey toner particles from hopper  92  for distribution to developer  86 . It should be understood that a developer or toner dispense assembly could be individual replacement units or a combined replacement unit. 
     In accordance with the present invention, an expert system is provided, including a computer with ancillary components, as well as software and hardware parts to receive raw data from a TAC sensor. The data is received at appropriate intervals and interpreted to report on the functional status of the subsystems and components of the machine. In addition to direct sensor data received from the machine, a knowledge of the parameters in process control algorithms is comprehended by the expert system in order to account for machine parameter and materials drift and other image quality factors. 
     In addition, when degradation of components or performance is detected, predictions of the impending failure causes a series of actions to occur, ranging from key operator notification of the predicted need for service to actually placing an order for the appropriate part for “just in time” delivery prior to actual part failure. The expert system is equipped to perform a set of specific functions or tests to instruct a service representative to perform whatever repair, part replacement, etc. that may be necessary for the maintenance and optimum operation of the machine. Such functions include status of periodic parts replacement due to wear or image quality determinations which may require adjustment of operational parameters of various modules or replacement of defective components. 
     The software that is loaded in such an expert system can be generic to common modules among all machines or specific to the machine that the customer has purchased. The expert system provides the interpretation of the complex raw data that continually emanates from various components and modules of the machine and provides information on the nature of the actions that need to be taken to maintain the machine for optimum performance. The Expert System accepts this raw data and interprets it to provide reduced service time resulting from the specific and correct diagnosis of both actual or predicted failures of machine parts. The Expert System is given very intimate details of the inner workings of the machine being monitored and thus provides similarly detailed information about the state of each individual component. This information is useful not only for field service diagnostics but can also be useful before and after product life in manufacturing by testing the behavior of the individual components and comparing it to a standard in re-manufacturing, remembering exactly the part failed and providing information as a database entry specific to a part and serial number. 
     There are basically two flavors of the Expert System. A “local” Expert System (including a hand held device) is connected to a single machine or installed in a single machine to perform monitoring, analysis, diagnostic, and communication functions. A second embodiment resides on a network, in a host computer, and provides the diagnostic needs of a population of machines to which is connected. While the diagnostic capability which is embedded within the product itself has the most immediate access to the raw sensor data, the highest potential bandwidth, and the fastest possible response time, it is sometimes limited by cost and functional requirements in the level of analysis, breadth of scope and depth of storage which can be maintained. The remote diagnostic system on the other hand, has the potential for virtually unlimited storage for monitoring and trend analysis and more computational horsepower for a detailed analysis of whatever data can be made available. 
     With reference to FIG. 4, there is shown a general schematic of the Expert System  31  in FIG.  1 . The Expert System is generally shown in FIG. 4 including a Knowledge Base  202  having a set of rules embodying an expert&#39;s knowledge about the operation, diagnosis, and correction of the machine, an Inference Engine  204  to efficiently apply the rules of the Knowledge Base  202  to solve machine problems, an Operator Interface  206  to communicate between the operator and the Expert System, and Rule Editor  208  to assist in modifying the Knowledge Base  202 . In operation, the Inference Engine  204  applies the Knowledge Base  202  rules to solve machine problems, compares the rules to data entered by the user about the problem, tracks the status of the hypothesis being tested and hypotheses that have been confirmed or rejected, asks questions to obtain needed data, states conclusions to the user, and even explains the chain of reasoning used to reach a conclusion. The function of the Operator Interface is to provide dialogue  210 , that is, ask questions, request data, and state conclusions in a natural language and translate the operator input into computer language. 
     The Expert System  13  itself includes memory with a profile of expected machine performance and parameters portion, a current switch and sensor information portion, and a table of historic machine performance and utilization events. The system monitors status conditions and initiates external communication relative to the status conditions of the machine. This procedure includes the steps of monitoring the predetermined status conditions relative to the operation of the machine, recognizing the deviation of the machine operation from said predetermined status conditions, recognizing the inability of the machine to automatically respond to the deviation to self correct, and, determining the need for external response to provide additional information for evaluation for further analysis. 
     Upon this determination the system will request additional information for evaluation for further analysis, and upon receipt of said additional information, determine the correct response to return the machine operation to a mode not in deviation from said predetermined status conditions. It also automatically provides the to correct response to return the machine operation to a mode not in deviation from the predetermined status conditions. The Expert System  13 , as discussed, periodically responds to the operating conditions or parameters being analyzed to determine if there is a threshold level or value stored in a threshold file that is outside the range of acceptable machine operation. If all threshold levels are determined to be within acceptable machine operation, no action is taken by the Expert System  13 . However, if it is determined that the sensed values from the sensors and detectors represent a condition that is outside the range or accepted level of threshold values as stored in threshold file  194 , the Expert System  13  will respond and analyze the data and take corrective action. 
     With reference to FIGS. 5A and 5B, according to the present invention, a series of tests, both stand alone and cumulative, logically analyze test results to determine any parts or subsystems needing replacement. These tests are based upon readings of selective test patches by a toner area coverage sensor. 
     The underlying basis of the invention is that it is cheaper and quicker to replace a part rather than spending valuable service time trying to correct or repair a part or subsystem at the customer&#39;s site. In particular, there is provided a highly intelligent, fully automated xerographic diagnostic routine that has the ability to inform the service representative that a specific part or parts need to be replaced. This task was accomplished by designing a series of individual tests that when performed in a logical manner and their results analyzed according to specific paradigms, the net result would point to the failure of one or more individual subsystems within the xerographic engine. 
     Some of the tests themselves are and could be used as stand alone diagnostic routines. They consist mainly of reading of various halftone and solid area patches by the process control sensors (BTAC, ESV, etc.) created under specific xerographic conditions usually in a before and after situation. The system analyzes the data using highly sophisticated tools (statistic packages, FFT&#39;s, etc.), looks at trends and obtains a result. It then combines this result with the results of various other tests and extracts logical conclusions as to the health of a specific subsystem. 
     For example: to test the cleaning subsystem, it may be necessary to concatenate the results of tests A, C, D, &amp; F. For this test, A and D may be weighted more than C and F. The final result is that the cleaner test has some value of 60 with a variance of +/−8%. The failure mode may be &gt;65 (+/−5%). In this instance the cleaning subsystem would have failed. 
     According to the invention, there is an analysis of all the various test combinations for each part that it needs to interrogate and obtains a part to replace code. This code is then readily available to be accessed by the service rep either over the phone line or through the portable workstation (PWS). When displayed, a corresponding list of part or parts to replace is presented which relates back to the code. This system will run automatically when certain conditions are met within the process control system or can be called by the operator through the Ul or the service rep through the PWS. 
     It should also be noted that the xerographic engine can be instructed from a remote site to run a setup when needed or to run a diagnostic self analysis routine and return via the phone line any pertinent results and/or parts to replace. Upon receiving the remote command, the xerographic subsystem goes off line, runs the appropriate routine and then returns to a ready state and conveys any information back to the calling center. 
     In modern xerographic print engines, process controls uses a variety of reflective sensors to monitor and control the tone reproduction curve of the xerographic process. One such sensor is the BTAC (Black Toner Area Coverage) sensor. In a final test for proper operation, the BTAC must be calibrated to the bare reflectance (absence of toner) of the photoreceptor. To achieve this, the output of an LED in the sensor is pulsed (stepped) until a certain analog voltage or level of reflectance is attained. This calibration process is continually repeated. 
     The thrust of this invention is to capture the initial number of steps that it takes to calibrate the photoreceptor on a virgin machine module or customer replaceable unit CRU as shown in FIG.  6 . The system knows when the CRU is brand new (and thus free of contamination) by reading an EPROM integrated circuit which is housed in the not shown CRU. Typically a clean photoreceptor will calibrate at 7 or 8 steps which is between 3.7-4.0 volts analog on the sensor (100% reflectance). This step value is then stored in nonvolatile memory (NVM) and used as a baseline. As the contamination (dirt level) increases, the LED steps will increase. On the next calibration (preferably at every cycle up of the xerographic subsystem), the step count is captured. The dirt level is calculated by subtracting the baseline from the current step count: 
     
       
         Dirt Level=current step count−baseline 
       
     
     This value is then displayed to the user interface. The BTAC sensor has a maximum light output of 24 steps. Therefore the dirt level range is 0-24. A gas gauge display could be used to illustrate a range of conclusions such as clean (range 0-6), moderated dirt build up (range 6-18) and cleaning necessary (range 18-24). 
     In one embodiment, output is displayed only as a value and it has proved to be a very useful tool and a good indication of the relative contamination level of the BTAC and the xerographic subsystem. 
     The process control system continuously monitors the state of the xerographic process. Sensors read various halftone patches which are an indication of the quality of the developed image. If the patch quality is not within range, changes are made to various actuators to bring the process back to center. The soundness of the patch is highly effected by the uniform quality of the belt surface. A scratch or defect on the photoreceptor where the patches are produced can change the outcome of a patch read. 
     Therefore, a second test is to take samples of the entire photoreceptor surface with the Black Toner Area Coverage (BTAC) sensor every 1.5 mm. Using a seam detection algorithm, the seam samples are discarded, and an overall clean belt uniformity measurement is calculated. This value is used as a baseline. Since the seam location was found, the location of each process control patch and its related BTAC readings can be analyzed. The mean and variance are determined for each patch and compared to the baseline value. Through a statistical analysis, the uniformity of each location computed and compared to the baseline. The operator can then be informed to replace the belt if the uniformity was lower than an acceptable level. 
     Images are written on the photoreceptor by means of a dual beam raster output scanner. Dual beams can produce images twice as fast as a single beam laser. When both lasers malfunction, diagnosis is fairly easy. However, when one fails, it is more difficult to determine the failure mode. 
     The thrust of another feature of the invention, as shown in FIG. 7, to differentiate between laser A and laser B. Knowing the fact that the lasers write alternate scan lines, two halftone patches are created, as illustrated, the first written from laser A only, the second from laser B only. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
               
                 Patch Pattern Construction 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Laser A 
                 Laser B 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 0x00 
                 0xFF 
               
               
                   
                 0xFF 
                 0x00 
               
               
                   
                 0x00 
                 0xFF 
               
               
                   
                 0xFF 
                 0x00 
               
               
                   
                 0x00 
                 0xFF 
               
               
                   
                 0xFF 
                 0x00 
               
               
                   
                 0x00 
                 0xFF 
               
               
                   
                 0xFF 
                 0x00 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The routine first measures with the black toner and area coverage (BTAC) sensor, a 100% reflective (clean) patch and record its value. Next it lays and develops the laser B patch which would print full on from laser B and full off from laser A. The patch is then measured and its reflectance is calculated. A similar patch is created using laser A on and laser B off, and its reflectance also measured and recorded. These patches should be approximately equal to the value of a 50% halftone patch. Now each patch was compared to the clean patch as follows: 
     
       
         laser failed if: laser patch&gt;clean patch−offset 
       
     
     What this states is that the laser patch is higher than a 50% patch and approximately equal to a clean patch. In other words, no patch was developed. The laser had failed to write. 
     As a cleaning system is a xerographic engine becomes stressed, the overall health of the machine begins to deteriorate. This is due to the fact that unwanted toner is either left on the photoreceptor or it is dispersed throughout the engine. The toner which is not cleaned from the photoreceptor may interfere with the process control patches and inhibit the control algorithms from accurately predicting the “real” state of process. The dispersed toner can contaminate the marking engine and result in a degrading of the overall copy quality of the machine. Having the ability to detect any stress in the cleaning subsystem is a distinct advantage for the reasons stated above. 
     Another feature of the present invention uses the area coverage sensor (BTAC) and a software algorithm to statistically test the ability of the cleaner to clean the photoreceptor surface as shown in FIGS. 8A,  8 B, and  8 C. As the photoreceptor is deadcycling, two 0% (clean) patches are laid in the image zones and a series of evenly spaced BTAC reads (&gt;100) are captured for each zone. The mean, variance and standard deviation is now calculated for the data obtained. 
     Two 50% patches are now laid and developed in the exact same location as the 0% patches. These patches are now cleaned by the cleaner. After this procedure, the series of BTAC reads are repeated and the statistical data is again calculated and stored. The technique compares the before and after statistical data and issues a status indicating a cleaner problem if any of the calculated parameters are above some pre-determined threshold. 
     Basic xerography is controlled by three subsystems; charge, exposure, and development such as Hybrid Jumping Development. In Discharge Area Development systems, one can develop an image with the absence of charge. This principle makes it possible to devise a logical method for determining certain failure modes of these three actuators. The essence of this feature of the invention is a technique to measure and analyze a series of process control patches from which failure modes can be sorted and deducted as shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B. 
     The first step is to test the charging subsystem. Three different halftone patches (12%, 50%, and 87%) are produced using nominal settings for charge, exposure, and development. The reflectance of each patch is measured with the BTAC sensor. If the level of each patch is within a reasonable range, it is assumed that the charging system is working well. If each patch is measured to be very dark, it is deducted that the charging subsystem is malfunctioning. At this point, the method is halted, and charge is tagged to be faulted. 
     The second step (if charge is OK) creates a patch by turning off charge and exposure and enabling development. This will create a very dark patch. The level of this patch is measured by the BTAC and the following logic is employed: 
     
       
         
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 Very Dark 
                 No Malfunction 
               
               
                 Dark 
                 Mag Roll Malfunction, Low TC 
               
               
                 Dark to Light 
                 Donor Roll Malfunction, Background, Intermittent 
               
               
                   
                 Ground 
               
               
                 Light 
                 Hjd Power Supply Malfunction, Developer 
               
               
                   
                 Drives Problem Very Bad Ground 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The third step creates a patch using nominal charge, nominal development, and a very high exposure setting. This will create a very dark patch. The level of this patch is measured by the BTAC and the following logic is employed: 
     
       
         
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 Very Dark 
                 No Malfunction 
               
               
                 Dark 
                 Video Cabling 
               
               
                 Dark to Light 
                 Bad Ground 
               
               
                 Light 
                 Video Path 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     When reproducing halftones, maintaining uniformity is a primary consideration. When nonuniformity or developability variation also known as strobing, exists it can become a dissatisfier to the customer and may require a service call. The sources of the nonuniformity are many: drives, power supplies, or the photoreceptor ground for example. Determining the source of the nonuniformity can often be time consuming. 
     The essence of this test is the creation of a highly intelligent, fully automated, diagnostic routine. This is accomplished by taking samples of a 50% halftone over the entire photoreceptor circumference with the BTAC sensor. The samples are taken every 1.5 mm for two belt cycles. Each belt cycle is treated independently. The data is then analyzed. This analysis consists of comparing frequencies calculated by the FFT to previously identified frequencies. The outcome of the analysis is the identification of source of the nonuniformity. This diagnostic can be run remotely (RDT) enabling the service representative to bring the correct part at the time of service, reducing diagnostic time and customer down time. 
     Images are written on the photoreceptor by means of a Raster Output Scanner. The images themselves are made up of pixels. The pixels are created by the ROS exposing small dots on the photoreceptor and then developer material adhering to the dots creating an image. To maintain proper copy quality, these pixels must be created with the proper energy distribution. When a malfunction occurs in the ROS (wobble, heat rise, electrical noise), the energy distribution becomes distorted and copy quality degrades. 
     The essence of this aspect of the invention is a technique to discover when the ROS was malfunctioning as shown in FIG.  10 . This is accomplished by creating two unique patches (one patch consisting of horizontally aligned pixels, the other with vertically aligned pixels), as shown in patch pattern below: 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
               
                 Patch Pattern Construction 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Horizontal 
                 Vertical 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 11111111 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 00000000 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 00000000 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 00000000 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 11111111 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 00000000 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 00000000 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                 00000000 
                 10001000 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     When developed the reflectance of these patches is read by the BTAC sensor and recorded. If the pixels were being formed correctly, the difference between the two patches would be minute, since the energy dispatched for each patch is the same. However, if the pixels are distorted, the value of one patch would be different than the other and a delta would result. This is due to the integrating properties of the BTAC sensor. Therefore, if the absolute valve is greater than a target valve i.e. (horizontal patch−vertical patch)&gt;target, a possible malfunction could exist in the ROS. 
     As prints are produced, the developer subsystem needs to be continuously replenished with toner. This is achieved through a toner dispenser subsystem which consists of a dispense motor and a containment reservoir. This system can become inoperative when the motor fails (electrically loses power or the gears become jammed) or the auger within the containment reservoir becomes impacted with toner and binds up. 
     The essence of this aspect of the invention is to have the process control monitor and detect when any of the above inoperable conditions occur as shown in FIG.  11 . This is achieved by laying down on the photoreceptor a toner control patch and measuring its value with the BTAC sensor. If the value is within a reasonable range (the patch does not show that the system is in a very light development condition), toner is now dispensed for a fixed period of time (enough time to redistribute the toner). A second toner control patch is now laid and its value recorded. The system now looks for a delta in the reflectance between the two patches equal to some known value for the rate of toner dispensed. If the dispenser is working correctly, the second patch should have darkened by a certain amount. If the dispenser is dysfunctional, there should have been little or no movement between the first and second patch. In this case, the machine is shut down and a call for service status is displayed. 
     With respect to FIGS. 5A and 5B there is shown a flow chart of one embodiment of a xerographic xerciser in accordance with the present invention. In particular, a sequence of tests are performed to determine the failure of specific parts or subsystems. Some tests are directly related to a specific part of subsystem whereas the results of other tests may be saved and combined with other tests to determine specific part or subsystem failure. The results of tests can be combined with one or several other tests and can be used in a multiple level or hierarchy of analysis to pinpoint part of subsystem failure. 
     In block  120 , the toner area coverage sensor, in this case, a black toner area coverage (BTAC) sensor is calibrated. A first level of determination is whether or not the sensor passes the calibration standard as shown in block  122 , and if so, a next level test, a dirt level check is performed as shown in block  126 . If the calibration determination in block  122  fails, the machine is stopped as illustrated in block  124 . The dirt level check as illustrated in block  126  is further illustrated in FIG.  6 . 
     After the dirt level check, there is a photoreceptor patch uniformity test as illustrated at block  128 . In essence, this test checks for defective areas of a xerographic photoreceptor surface. The result of the previous test is to determine if there is an adequate charge provided by the system charging mechanism, as illustrated in block  130 . If there is not an adequate charge, the system stops as shown at block  134 . If there is adequate charge, as determined at block  132 , a ROS beam failure test is conducted as shown in block  136 . Further details of the ROS beam failure test are illustrated in the flow chart in FIG.  7 . After the ROS beam failure test, a cleaner test is conducted as illustrated in block  138  and shown in more detail in FIGS. 8A,  8 B, and  8 C. 
     A more comprehensive actuator performance indicator test is illustrated in precharged test block  140  and ROS test  142  and shown in detail in the flow chart in FIGS. 9A and 9B. Following the actuator performance indicator tests, there is provided a background test illustrated in block  144  and a banding test illustrated in block  146 . Following these tests as illustrated in block  148 , there are provided a series of standard charge tests, exposure tests, grid slope tests, and exposure slope tests as illustrated in blocks  150 A,  150 B,  150 C, and  150 D. Upon the completion of these tests there is conducted a ROS pixel size test as illustrated in block  152  and illustrated in detail in the flow chart in FIG.  10 . Also, there is a toner dispenser test illustrated in block  154  and shown in greater detail in the flow chart in FIG.  11 . Finally, as illustrated in blocks  156  and  158 , there is an analysis of all the test results and a display of failed parts. A typical scenario of the overall analysis of all the test results is illustrated in the flow chart in FIG.  12 . 
     With reference to FIG. 6, the dirt level check includes the steps of calibrating the BTAC sensor as shown in block  160 , and a first determination at block  162  as whether or not the sensor module is new. That is, in a preferred embodiment, the sensor is incorporated into a machine module or customer replaceable unit and the first determination is whether or not this is a new module in the machine or one that has been in the machine and operating. If it is a new module, the sensor is calibrated and the step count of calibration forms the basis for future calibrations and is stored in memory as illustrated in block  164 . If the module is not a new module, then as shown in block  166 , the number of calibration steps to calibrate the sensor over and above the number of calibration steps to calibrate the sensor when new is provided. A determination is then made of the level of deterioration of sensing capability. 
     If there is a first number of calibration steps over and above the base calibration level needed, for example, 0-6, as shown in block  168 , then the machine is determined to be relatively clean as indicated at block  170 . A dirt level of from 6-18 additional calibration steps needed, as shown in block  172 , would indicate a moderate dirt build up within the machine as shown at block  174 . Finally, a dirt level indication of from 19 to 26 additional steps, as shown in block  176 , would indicate that cleaning is necessary as shown in block  178 . It should be understood that the number of steps and the ranges of clean, moderate, and cleaning necessary are design considerations and any number of embodiments could be implemented. 
     With reference to FIG. 7, there is illustrated the ROS beam failure test. In particular, at block  180  the sensor is calibrated and at block  182  a record is made of the reflectance of a 100% clean patch on the photoreceptor. Next, a special patch is laid with laser B only of the dual beam laser. The special patch is such that laser B is modulated and laser A not modulated. The resultant relative reflectance of the patch is recorded and if laser B is operating correctly, there should be approximately 50% halftone reflectance. At block  188 , a patch is laid with only laser A modulated due to the special modulating information. A record of the relative reflectance of laser A is recorded as illustrated in block  190 . Again, a 50% halftone relative reflectance is expected if laser A is operating correctly. The comparison is made as illustrated in block  192  and if the relative reflectance of laser B is greater than a given threshold, then it is determined that laser B has failed as shown in block  194 . Similarly, the relative reflectance of laser A is determined compared to a threshold as shown in block  196 , and if the relative reflectance exceeds the threshold, it is determined that laser A has failed as shown in block  198 . If neither laser A nor B has failed, then as shown in block  200 , both beams are operating correctly. 
     With reference to FIG. 8A, there are shown two 0% (clean) patches laid in image zones and a series of evenly spaced sensor (BTAC) reads. FIG. 8B illustrates the development of two 5% half tone patches in the same locations as the 0% patches of FIG.  8 A. There are no reads of these patches and these patches are then cleaned of toner from the photoreceptor surface. After cleaning, as shown in FIG. 8C, the same sensor reads are again taken as done in FIG.  8 A. The before cleaning and after cleaning sensor reads are then compared to give an indication of the efficiency of the cleaner. If the degree of toner that is not cleaned as illustrated by the toner dots in FIG. 8C is above a given threshold, then there is a determination of a cleaner problem or malfunction. 
     FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate actuator performance indications. In particular, with reference to FIG. 9A, the calibration of the sensor is shown at block  220 . Block  222  illustrates the measurement of the relative reflectance of a clean patch. If the relative reflectance of the patch is less than a given threshold, for example,  45 , then there is an indication of a charging problem as shown in block  226 . It should be noted that the numeral  45  represents a digitized sensor signal in the range of 0-255 and the number selected is a designed decision based upon machine characteristics. A relative reflectance signal less than 45 indicates very dark patches. If the relative reflectance is not less than 45, then as shown in block  228 , the charge and exposure systems are turned off and the development unit enabled. 
     The relative reflectance of special patches are then measured, for example, a 12%, 50%, and 87% half tone patch. The half tone level of each patch is measured by the sensor. If the relative reflectance is greater than 120 as illustrated in block  230 , indicating a very light response, then there is indicated a range of problems as illustrated in block  232 . On the other hand, if the relative reflectance is less than 120 but greater than 60 as illustrated in decision block  234 , indicating a dark to light response, then there is an indication of a set of malfunctions as illustrated in block  236 . If the relative reflectance is less than 60 but greater than 35 as illustrated in block  238 , indicating a dark response, then another set of problems are indicated as illustrated at block  240 . Finally, if the relative reflectance is less than 35 indicating a very dark response, then no malfunction is indicated and the development system is operational as shown in block  242 . 
     The next step is to set the charge and development to nominal to create a patch with a high exposure setting and determine the relative reflectance. As illustrated in block  246 , if the relative reflectance digitized signal is greater than  120 , indicating a light patch, a video path problem is indicated as shown in block  248 . If the relative reflectance is less than 120 but greater than 80 as shown in block  250 , indicating a dark to light patch, then there is determined a bad ground as shown in block  252 . On the other hand, if the relative reflectance is less than 80 but greater than 40, a dark patch illustrated in block  254 , there is an indication of a video cabling problem as shown in block  256 . Finally, if the relative reflectance is less than 40, indicating a very dark patch, there is a determination of no malfunction with the ROS system as shown in block  258 . 
     With reference to FIG. 10, there is illustrated a ROS pixel size growth detector procedure. In particular, at block  260  the sensor is calibrated, and, as shown in block  262 , a patch is provided using horizontally aligned pixels. The relative reflectance of this patch is recorded as illustrated in block  264  and in block  266  a patch using vertically aligned pixels is provided. In block  268  the relative reflectance of this patch is recorded. If the absolute value of the difference of these two relative reflectance readings is greater than a given target value, as illustrated in block  270 , then there is determined to be a ROS malfunction as shown in block  272 . If the difference is less than a target value, then the ROS is determined to be operational as shown in block  274 . 
     With reference to FIG. 11, there is shown in the flow chart a technique to monitor toner dispense. In particular, three special toner concentration patches are provided on the photoreceptor surface as illustrated in block  276 . The details of these three special patches are described in pending U.S. Ser. No. 926,476 filed Sep. 10, 1997, incorporated herein. The patches are read by the BTAC sensor and an average reflectance calculated as shown in block  278 . If the reflectance with reference to a clean patch is greater than 15% as illustrated in decision block  280 , then there is a determination of a normal toner concentration. However, if the average reflectance is less than 15%, then as illustrated in block  282 , the tones dispense is activated for 15 seconds. 
     It should be noted that 15 seconds is a design choice and in one embodiment is the time for toner to get from a toner bottle dispenser on to the photoreceptor and sensed by the sensor. After activation of the toner dispenses for a given period of time, again three toner concentration patches are provided as illustrated at block  284 . Again there is a sensing and calculation of the average reflectance as shown in block  286 . If the reflectance is greater than 20 as illustrated in the decision block  288 , then the dispenser is determined to be operational as shown in block  292 . On the other hand, if the reflectance is 20 or less, there is a determination as shown in block  290  that there is a toner dispense malfunction. 
     With reference to FIG. 12, there is disclosed in flowchart form, a given scenario for progressive levels of monitoring, analysis, and diagnostics for a given machine. At block  300 , there is illustrated the sensing of status for a given machine at level  1 . It should be understood that a level  1  status could be running a set of first level tests for a given sensor to identify deteriorating parts or subsystems at the first level. Block  302  illustrates a level  1  analysis and in decision block  304 , there is a determination based upon the level  1  analysis at  302  whether or not a level  1  response is required. A response as shown at blocks  306  and  308  could be the determination of a part needing replacement and notification or alert provided as illustrated at block  310 . Level  1  could be a direct analysis of specific components based upon the sensed data at hand and could include some level of trend tracking such as tracking machine fault trends, tracking component wear, and tracking machine usage. 
     Assuming no level  1  response is indicated at block  310  that would require a machine shutdown, there is a sensing of machine status at a level  2  and a level  2  analysis as illustrated at blocks  314  and  316 . It should be understood that a level  2  status could be running a set of second level tests for a given sensor to identify deteriorating parts or subsystems. A level  2  analysis could also incorporate results of tests or additional sensor measurements at the first level. At decision block  318 , there is a determination based upon the level  2  analysis at  316  whether or not a level  2  response or action is required. A response as shown at blocks  320  and  322  again could be the determination of a part needing replacement and notification or alert provided as illustrated at block  324 . Level  2  could be a direct analysis of specific components based upon the sensed data at hand or could be indirect analysis based upon inferences from sensed data. Level  2  also could include tracking machine fault trends, tracking component wear, and tracking machine usage. At a level  2  analysis, additional sensors or additional control and first level diagnostic analysis information is considered. 
     Assuming no level  2  response is indicated at block  324  that would require a machine shutdown, there is a sensing of machine status at a level  3  and a level  3  analysis as illustrated at blocks  328  and  330 . It should be understood that a level  3  status could be running a set of third level tests and could also incorporate results of tests or additional sensor measurements at the first and second levels. At decision block  332 , there is a determination based upon the level  3  analysis at  330  whether or not a level  3  response or action is required. A response as shown at blocks  334  and  336  again could be the determination of a part needing replacement and notification or alert provided as illustrated at block  338 . Level  3  again could be a direct analysis of specific components based upon the sensed data at hand or could be indirect analysis based upon inferences from sensed data at levels  1  and  2 . Level  3  again could include tracking machine fault trends, tracking component wear, and tracking machine usage. 
     It should be understood that FIG. 12 is merely one scenario or example of the use of part replacement identification using an Expert System and a system of progressing through various tests and levels of analysis to specifically identify a part or subsystem for replacement. This includes the display and notification of the replacement part either locally at the machine or remotely to the appropriate service organization. 
     With reference to FIG. 13, there is illustrated a more practical example of an Expert System in accordance with the present invention. The Expert System generally shown at  400 , includes a subsystem and component monitor  402 , an analysis and predictions component  404 , a diagnostic component  406 , and a communication component  408 . It should be understood that suitable memory is inherent in the system  400  in the monitor, analysis and predictions, diagnostics, and communication components. The monitor element contains a pre-processing capability including a feature extractor which isolates the relevant portions of data to be forwarded on to the analysis and diagnostic elements. In general, the monitor element  402  receives machine data as illustrated at  410  and provides suitable data to the analysis and predictions component  404  to analyze machine operation and status and track machine trends such as usage of disposable components as well as usage data, and component and subsystem wear data. 
     Diagnostic component  406  receives various machine sensor and control data from the monitor  402  as well as data from the analysis and prediction  404  to provide immediate machine correction as illustrated at  416  as well as to provide crucial diagnostic and service information through communication component  408  on line  412  to an interconnected network to a remote Expert System on the network such as a centralized host machine with various additional diagnostic tools. Included can be suitable alarm condition reports, requests to replenish depleted consumables, specific part or subsystem replacement data, and data sufficient for a more thorough diagnostics of the machine. Also provided is a local access  414  or interface for a local service representative to access various analysis, prediction, and diagnostic data stored in the system  400  as well as to interconnect any suitable diagnostic device. 
     With reference to FIG. 14, there is disclosed a typical machine Expert System  400  interconnected to a printing or any other suitable electronic imaging machine  422  as well as connected to network  420 . It should be understood that the scope of the present invention contemplates various configurations of a machine Expert System as well as interconnections to machines networks and other network Expert Systems. It should be understood that the present invention encompasses various alternatives of a machine Expert System such as analysis and predictor elements, a diagnostic element capable of a hierarchy of diagnostic levels, and various configurations to receive sensed data and controlled data from a machine. For example, in FIG. 14 certain sensed data illustrated at  428  is provided both to the monitor  402  and machine control  424 . Other data illustrated at  426  is provided directly only to monitor  402 , which also receives control data on line  430 . Both the communication element  408  and control  424  are shown as connected to the network  420 . Network server  418  connected to network  420  provides a higher level of analysis and diagnostics to machine  22  than the Expert System  400  and provides a higher level of analysis and diagnostics to other machines on the network. 
     While there has been illustrated and described what is at present considered to be a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be appreciated that numerous changes and modifications are likely to occur to those skilled in the art, and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all those changes and modifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.