Abstract:
A data collection system allows occupants in one or more locations to provide indications as to their respective levels of comfort. The indications as to comfort level are preferably provided through personal computers in these locations. Each computer is programmed to display a menu of comfort level options that may be selected by the user of the computer. Each computer is operative to require that any selected comfort level be accompanied by a verification as to the user making the one or more selections. The verification preferably requires an entry of an identification that may be checked against a stored identification. Each computer is operative to timely provide the selections as to comfort level by a recognized user to a network computer. The network computer is operative to analyze the comfort level information from these computers and send one or more commands to an HVAC system providing conditioned air to the locations.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   This invention relates to the gathering of information from locations to be provided with conditioned air by one or more HVAC systems. 
   The gathering of information from locations in which conditioned air is to be provided has heretofore been largely accomplished through the use of thermostats. These thermostats typically allow an individual to enter a preferred set point temperature indicative of the level of comfort that he or she desires. The thermostat also typically includes a sensor for sensing the actual temperature in the room. The difference between the entered setpoints and sensed temperatures are used to control one or more HVAC systems providing conditioned air to the locations. 
   There may be several people in a location that would have different feelings as to what the set point temperature should be. Individual thermostats do not allow these people to each individually provide their respective feelings of comfort. There is also no ability to identify who is requesting a particular level of comfort at a particular location. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   A data collection system allows individual occupants in one or more locations to provide an indication as to their respective levels of comfort. The indications as to comfort level are preferably provided through personal computers in these locations. Each computer is programmed to display a menu of comfort level options that may be selected by the user of the computer. Each computer is operative to also request that the user enter an identification. In the event that the entered identification is recognized, the computer will store the selection as to comfort level and timely provide the stored results to a network computer. The network computer is operative to analyze the comfort level information from these computers and send one or more commands to the HVAC system providing conditioned air to the locations. 
   In an exemplary preferred embodiment, individuals may select one of three different levels of comfort at their respective computers. The computers are grouped in accordance with the control of conditioned air to a particular location. Information from each of the computers is gathered and analyzed by a network computer which produces preferred levels of comfort for each location. This information as to preferred levels of comfort for each location is sent to an HVAC system control with damper controls that govern the flow of conditioned air to the various locations. The disclosed exemplary embodiment deals with levels of comfort for temperature in a location. The invention is, however, equally applicable to other measurements of comfort that may be analyzed and thereafter acted upon, including for instance, humidity or air flow. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     Further advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein: 
       FIG. 1  illustrates an office building with a number of offices grouped into a number of office area locations; 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a display menu as to comfort levels appearing on the screens of computers in the offices of  FIG. 1 ; 
       FIG. 3  illustrates a program located in the computers which generate the display menu of  FIG. 2 ; 
       FIG. 4  illustrates a program located on a network computer which collects and analyzes the menu selections entered into the programmed computers in the offices of  FIG. 1 ; 
       FIG. 5  illustrates an exemplary program that may be executed by a processor within an HVAC system control in response to one or more commands from the network computer executing the program of  FIG. 4 ; and 
       FIG. 6  illustrates the display of an alternative comfort level menu to that of  FIG. 2 . 
   

   DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
   Referring to  FIG. 1 , an HVAC system  10  provides conditioned air to a number of individual office area locations such as office area location  12  and office area location  14 . Each office area location will carry a particular office area index value for purposes of identifying comfort level data originating from the particular office area location. This is indicated by office area location  12  being office area  1  whereas office area location  14  is identified as office area N. 
   Each office area location is seen to include a number of individual personal computers such as computer  16  located in an office  18 . Each office within office area location  12  is identified by an office index “K” where K=for instance 1 for office  18  and is for instance another value for office  20 . 
   Each computer within an office in a particular office area location is preferably connected to a network computer  22 . As will be explained in detail hereinafter, the network computer  22  is operative to collect comfort level information entered in each of the computers within the individual offices of each office area location. The collected information is analyzed by particular office area index value. The network computer is thereafter operative to generate overall indications as to level of comfort in each office area. These overall indications as to comfort level are preferably indexed in accordance with the office area index and provided to an HVAC system control  24 . The HVAC system control  24  is operative to control the HVAC system  10  so as to provide appropriate amounts of conditioned air to each of the office areas in accordance with the information received from the network computer  22 . 
   Referring now to  FIG. 2 , a comfort level menu  30  appearing on the screen  32  of an office computer such as office computer  16  is shown. The comfort menu  30  preferably includes three levels of comfort for the temperature in the office in which the computer is located. These comfort levels are expressed as “TOO HOT”, “JUST RIGHT”, or “TOO COLD”. The office computer preferably includes a point and click operating system which allows the user to click on the particular comfort level being experienced by the occupant of the office. The occupant of the office thereafter preferably clicks on an icon  34  labeled “ENTER” after making his or her selection as to comfort level from the menu  30 . 
   Referring now to  FIG. 3 , the software routine executed by a processor within each office computer is shown. The routine begins with a step  35  wherein a comfort control menu is displayed on the computer screen of the office computer. The comfort control menu could be the particular comfort control menu  30  of  FIG. 2 . The processor proceeds to a step  36  and inquires as to whether an “ENTER” decision has been made. An “ENTER” decision will have been made when a person clicks upon the “ENTER” icon  34  appearing on the computer screen  32  in  FIG. 2 . When an “ENTER” decision has been made, the processor proceeds from step  36  to a step  37  and issues a request on the screen of the office computer for a user identification. The processor awaits the entry of the user identification in step  38  before proceeding to a step  39  and inquiring as to whether the entered user identification compares favorably with one or more stored user identifications. The stored user identifications are preferably stored in a memory associated with the processor in the office computer. These stored user identifications have preferably been previously entered in accordance with a routine that permits the entry of such identifications. This routine may itself require one or more interactive communications requiring the user to first enter a key or code that allows them to proceed to enter their own unique user identification. In this manner, only people who are normally occupants of the location will be given a key or code that would allow them to store their own unique user identification. In any event, if the entered user identification noted in step  38  compares favorably with the previously stored identification in step  39 , then the processor will proceed to store the menu selection made from the displayed menu of step  35 . For a menu selection made from the menu  30 , the processor preferably stores the selection as “T_INPUT_K”. The value of “K” within the stored menu selection variable “T_INPUT_K” will be the office index value for the particular office in which the office computer is located. The stored menu selection in “T_INPUT_K” is preferably 1 for a comfort level selection of “TOO HOT”, 0 for a comfort level selection of “JUST RIGHT”, and −1 for a comfort selection of “TOO COLD”. Referring again to step  39 , in the event that the entered user identification does not compare favorably with the previously stored user identification, then the processor proceeds to display a message in step  41  that entry of the menu selection has been denied. 
   Referring now to  FIG. 4 , the computer program implemented by the processor within the network computer  22  is shown. The program begins with a step  42  wherein the office area index, “N” is set equal to 1. A “TIMER_CLOCK” is also set equal to 0 so as to thereafter begin clocking time from a system clock associated with the processor in the network computer. The processor proceeds to step  44  and reads “T_INPUTS” for the office area index, “N”. Since “N” will be initially set equal to 1, the processor will be reading the menu selections for the office computers in office area  12 . The processor will preferably read each stored menu selection, “T_INPUT_K” for the particular office computer in the office area  12 . It will be remembered that the value of the stored menu selection will be 1 if the comfort level selection was “TOO HOT”, 0 if the comfort level selection was “JUST RIGHT”, and −1 if the comfort level selection was “TOO COLD”. The processor will proceed to a step  46  and compute the value of a variable “T_CLUSTER_AVG”. The value of this variable is equal to the sum of the read “T_INPUTS” in step  44 . The processor will proceed to a step  48  and inquire as to whether the value of “T_CLUSTER_AVG” is greater than the value of a variable “T_AVG_HI_LIMIT”. It is to be understood that the value of “T_AVG_HI_LIMIT” will be predefined for the particular office building or even office area under review. In this regard, assuming that there are ten office computers in each office area of the office building, then the value of “T_AVG_HI_LIMIT” could be equal to 5. This would require that the net sum of T_INPUTs would have to be greater than 5 in step  48  in order for the processor to proceed to a step  50 . It is, of course, to be appreciated that the value of “T_AVG_HI_LIMIT” could be set lower so as to not require that so many stored menu selections be equal to 1. Referring to step  50 , in the event that “T_CLUSTER_AVG” is greater than “T_AVG_HI_LIMIT”, then the processor sets the variable “CLUSTER_N_AVG” equal to 1. The value of “N” in this variable will equal the current office area index value. This variable will therefore be an overall indication as to the comfort level in the office area indicated by the index value “N”. This overall indication would be “TOO HOT” out of step  50 . 
   Referring again to step  48 , in the event that “T_CLUSTER_AVG” is not greater than “T_AVG_HI_LIMIT”, then the processor will proceed along a no path to a step  52 . Referring to step  52 , the processor will inquire as to whether “T_CLUSTER_AVG” is less than the value of “T_AVG_LOW_LIMIT”. It is to be appreciated that the value of “T_AVG_LOW_LIMIT” will be set for all office areas in the office building or for the particular office area then under review. This value will again be set so as to require that the net sum of “T_INPUTS” is predominantly negative so as to indicate a predominance of “TOO COLD” having been selected from the menu  30  on each screen of an office computer within the office area indicated by the index “N”. For instance, this variable may be set equal to −3, −4, or even −5 for an office area including ten separate office computers. In the event that “T_CLUSTER_AVG” is less than the value of “T_AVG_LO_LIMIT”, then the processor will proceed from step  52  to a step  54  and set “CLUSTER_N_AVG” equal to −1. This will be an overall indication that the office area having an office area index equal to the current value of N is too cold. 
   Referring again to step  52 , in the event that “T_CLUSTER_AVG” is not less than “T_AVG_LO_LIMIT”, then the processor will proceed to step  56  and set “CLUSTER_N_AVG” equal to 0, wherein the value of “N” will be the particular value of the office area index. This will be an overall indication that the temperature level is “JUST RIGHT” for the particular office area. 
   The processor proceeds from either step  50 , step  54 , or step  56  to a step  58  and inquires as to whether the office area index “N” is equal to “MAX_CLUSTER_INDEX”. The value of “MAX_CLUSTER_INDEX” will be equal to the highest value of the office area index identifying the last office area to be analyzed. In the event that the value of the office area index “N” is not equal to “MAX_CLUSTER_INDEX”, then the processor will proceed to a step  60  and increment the office area index “N” by one before returning to step  44 . It is to be understood that the processor within the network computer will again execute steps  44 – 58  so as to determine the overall indication of comfort for the office area indicated by the new value of office area index “N”. This will be stored in the new “CLUSTER_N_AVG”. The value of the office area index “N” in the variable “CLUSTER_N_AVG” will identify the particular office area to which the overall comfort level indication applies. 
   Referring again to step  58 , it will be understood that at some point, all office areas will have been analyzed and all overall comfort level indications will have been defined in respective values of “CLUSTER_N_AVG”. When this occurs, the processor will proceed to a step  62  and send all CLUSTER_N_AVGs for N=0 to N=MAX_CLUSTER to the HVAC system control  24 . The processor will proceed to step  64  and inquire as to whether the value of “TIMER_CLOCK” equals “MAX_TIME”. The value of “MAX_TIME” will be arbitrarily set for the particular office building or office area under examination. In either case, the “TIMER_CLOCK” must exceed the “MAX_TIME” in order for the processor to proceed back to step  42  and again begin to collect the comfort level selections that have been made and stored as “T_INPUT_K” for each office computer in the first office area having an office area index value of 1. The menu sections from all such office computers will again be analyzed and an overall comfort level indication for each particular office area will be defined in CLUSTER_N_AVG before proceeding to the next office area. When all such office areas have been analyzed, the overall comfort level indications for each office area will be forwarded to the HVAC control  24  again in step  62 . 
   Referring now to  FIG. 5 , an exemplary program or process is set forth that could be implemented in the HVAC system control  24 . The exemplary program could be used in response to the overall comfort level indications for each office area that are sent by the network computer  22 . The program or process begins with a processor within the HVAC system control implementing a step  70  wherein inquiries made as to whether all “CLUSTER_N_AVG” values have been received from the network computer  22 . When this occurs, the processor proceeds to step  72  and sets the office area index “N” equal to 1. The processor next reads “CLUSTER_N_AVG” for the current index value of “N”. The processor proceeds to step  76  and inquires as to whether the read “CLUSTER_N_AVG” of step  74  is equal to one. If it is, the processor will proceed to a step  78 . 
   Referring to step  78 , it will be assumed that the HVAC system  10  of  FIG. 1  includes damper position controls for each office area within the office building. In such a system employing damper control, the processor will, in step  78 , increase a “CLUSTER_N_DAMPER_POSITION” by a predefined amount “Δ” for a cooling mode of operation of the HVAC system. On the other hand, the processor will decrease the same “CLUSTER_N_DAMPER_POSITION” by the incremental amount “Δ” for a heating mode. This will thereby provide more cool air to an office area that has indicated that the office area is too hot or it will decrease the amount of heated air provided in the event that the HVAC system is in a heating mode of operation. Referring again to step  76 , in the event that the overall comfort level indication for temperature in the particular office area is not equal to one, then the processor will proceed to step  80  and inquire as to whether “CLUSTER_N_AVG” is equal to −1. In at the event that it is, the processor will proceed along a yes path to step  82  and increase the value of “CLUSTER_N_DAMPER_POSITION” by the incremental amount “Δ” when in a heating mode or decrease this damper position variable by “Δ” for a cooling mode. This will have the effect of providing A more heated air for an office area that has an overall comfort level indication of being too cold during the heating mode or decreasing the amount of cooled air provided to the same location in the event that the HVAC system is in a cooling mode. The processor will proceed from having either increased or decreased the damper position variable in step  82  to a step  84 . 
   Referring to step  84 , it is to be appreciated that this step will be encountered after execution of either step  78 , step  82  or step  80 . Referring to step  80  the processor proceeds along the no-path out of step  80  when the overall comfort level indication for temperature for the particular office area is neither equal to 1 or −1. The overall comfort level indication for temperature will in this case be 0 indicating that the overall comfort level is just right. The processor will, in step  80 , inquire as to whether the value of the office area index “N” equals the value of “MAX_CLUSTER_INDEX”. It will be remembered that the value of “MAX_CLUSTER_INDEX” is equal to the highest value of the office area index. This would identify the last office area having an overall comfort level value to be processed. In the event that the processor has not processed the last overall comfort level value for the last office area, the processor will proceed along the no-path and increment the office area index “N” by one in a step  86 . The processor will proceed back to step  74  and read the “CLUSTER_N_AVG” for the office area having the newly defined office area index value. The overall comfort level value for temperature for this particular office area will be analyzed and the damper position variables will be appropriately incremented or decremented as has been previously described. At some point the overall comfort level indications for all office area will have been processed again. At this point, the processor will proceed out of step  84  along the yes path back to step  70 . The processor will again await receipt of a new set of overall comfort level indications for the office areas before proceeding to analyze each such overall comfort level indication and again, set the damper positions in steps  72  through  86 . 
   Referring now to  FIG. 6 , an example of an alternative menu that could be displayed on each office computer is shown. The comfort control menu  90  is with respect to humidity. In this regard, the occupant of the room is invited to select between “TOO DRY”, “JUST RIGHT” and “TOO HUMID”. The occupant clicks on the ENTER icon  92  when the selection has been made. The network computer will analyze the comfort level values for each office computer regarding humidity in much the same manner as been heretofore described with respect to the comfort control for temperature in  FIG. 2 . The humidity for the particular office area will either be adjusted upwardly or downwardly or no change made to it depending on the overall comfort level indication for the particular office area. This can be done either by dedicated humidifiers in the air flow paths to the particular office areas or it could be done at the central location of the HVAC system. In the latter case, all comfort level indications as to humidity for all office areas would have to be analyzed before determining whether or not to adjust any centrally located humidifier. In this latter instance, if the overall humidity is to be raised, and one or more of the offices, in fact, indicated that they wanted less humidity, then the dampers could be controlled in conjunction with the new raised humidity level for office areas indicating that the comfort level for humidity was already too high. 
   It is to be appreciated from the above that a number of programs resident in processors within an office computer, a network computer, and an HVAC system control have been disclosed. Alterations, modifications and improvements to these various individual programs may readily occur to those skilled in the art. For instance, the particular comfort control menu may vary as to how it is displayed as well as how many particular comfort level selections may be made. Furthermore, the processor program executed by the network computer could compute the overall comfort level indications for each particular office area in a different manner. This could include summing all comfort level values provided by the office computers and dividing by the number of computers in the particular office area. This could thereafter be compared with an appropriate high and low limit for such a computed average before setting the particular overall comfort level indication for that particular office area. The network computer program could furthermore require several distinct samplings of the comfort levels from each office computer with resulting computations as to overall comfort level indications before arriving at a particular overall comfort level indication average that is to be used for that particular area. It is to be furthermore understood that the particular program implemented by an HVAC system control downstream of the network computer could vary considerably depending on the HVAC system that is to be controlled and the particular overall comfort level indication that is to be responded to. In this regard, an alternative to temperature comfort could be the humidity in each office area. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the particular programs in the preferred embodiment is by way of example only and the invention is to be limited by the following claims and equivalents thereto.