Abstract:
An undetectable firewall for network protection has been developed. The invention includes a method of preventing unauthorized access to a computer system. The firewall receives a data packet and copies its contents exactly. Next, the firewall analyzes the data packet and determines if it is authorized to access the network. If the packet is authorized to access the network, it is sent on to its destination. If the packet is unauthorized to access the network, it is dropped by the firewall.

Description:
BACKGOUND OF INVENTION  
         [0001]    1. Field of the Invention  
           [0002]    The invention relates generally to computer security. More particularly, this invention relates to a computer security system that provides undetectable firewall protection.  
           [0003]    1. Background Art  
           [0004]    As society&#39;s dependence on computers increases, the importance of security for computers and their networks also increases. Threats such as hackers can shut down or damage large computer networks and cost significant amounts of money, resources, and time. Security measures to prevent such incidents are constantly evolving along with the nature and sophistication of the threat.  
           [0005]    One technique to protect a computer network from external threats is by using a “firewall”. A firewall is a combination of hardware and software that is placed between a network and its exterior. FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a prior art network  10  with a firewall. The network  10  includes a series of users  12   a - 12   d that are linked and controlled through a server  14 . The device could also be a router or a switch for the network. A firewall  16  is installed between the server  14  and the network exterior  20 . The server  14 , the firewall  16 , and the exterior  20  are interconnected through a single line  18 . The single line  18  prevents outsiders from accessing the network except through the firewall  16 . The firewall receives all data from the network exterior before it is sent to the network users. The data may be e-mail, encrypted data, internet queries, or any other type of network traffic. The firewall sorts and analyzes the data and determines whether it should have access to the network. If the data is authorized, the firewall forwards the data on to its destination. If the data is unauthorized, the firewall denies access to the network.  
           [0006]    Data is normally transmitted in multiple bundles of information called “data packets” or “packets”. A message, query, etc. from the outside network is broken down into these packets in order to provide more efficient transmission of the data. Once all packets of data arrive at the destination, the packets are re-assembled. However, the packets contain more information than just the transmitted data. FIG. 2 shows a diagram of a prior art data packet  30 . The packet  30  includes three segments: a header  32 ; a body  34 ; and a trailer  36 . The body  34  is the segment that contains the actual substance of the data.  
           [0007]    The header  32  and the trailer  36  both contain various fields that are necessary for the administrative control of the packet  30 . The header  32  segment includes: a flag  38   a ; an address field  40 ; and a control field  42 . The trailer  36  segment includes: a sequence check field  44  and a flag  38   b . The first flag  38   a  signifies the start of the packet  30 . A second flag  38   b  signifies the end of the packet  30 . The sequence check field  44  provides a check to ensure the data of the packet was properly received. The address field  40  includes the addresses of the source and the destination of the data. The control field  42  contains various information related to the administration of the packet  30  including a “time-to-live” field. The time-to-live field is an internal countdown mechanism that ensures that undeliverable or lost packets are deleted. The time-to-live field is given a certain value when the packet is first transmitted. As the packet passes through various servers, routers, switches, bridges, gateways, etc. that make up a network, the time-to-live field is decremented once by each device it passes through. Once the time-to-live field reaches zero, the packet is deleted. This mechanism prevents a lost or undeliverable packet from circulating on the network in an endless loop.  
           [0008]    [0008]FIG. 3 shows a flow chart  50  of a prior art network firewall protection scheme. First, a packet is received at the firewall  52  from the network exterior  20 . The firewall then conducts a handshake protocol  54  after receipt of the packet. The operations of network components are governed by protocols. A protocol is simply an established set of rules or standards that allow computers to connect with one another and exchange information and data with as little error as possible. Protocols may vary widely based different types of computer operating systems and on the different types of communications that are being transmitted. A handshake protocol governs a series of signals acknowledging that the transfer of data can take place between devices (“the handshake”). During the handshake, various changes are made to the packet by the firewall. The address of the firewall is added to the address field to show that the packet has left the firewall. Also, the time-to-live field is decremented by the firewall.  
           [0009]    After completing the handshake  54 , the packet is analyzed by the firewall to determine whether or not the data is acceptable to forward on to its destination in the network  56 . The firewall analyzes the data through a technique called “pattern matching” that is well known in the art. Additionally, other techniques such as “protocol analysis” could be used as well. If the packet is authorized, it is forwarded on to the network destination by the firewall  58 . If the packet is unauthorized, it is denied access to the network  60  and a message such as “resource denied” or “resource restricted” is sent to the sender. The party who sent the data from the exterior network is able to monitor and detect the presence of the firewall after the handshake protocol  62  and after access has been denied  62  due to the changes in the packet at the handshake  62 . Once a hacker is able to detect the presence of a firewall, attempts can be made penetrate it and gain access to the network. If a hacker gains knowledge of the presence of a firewall, probes can be made against it. Ultimately, the firewall may be breached or bypassed and unauthorized access to the network can be gained by the hacker.  
           [0010]    In addition to the contents of the data packet described in FIG. 2, a data packet will also contain an “ethernet frame field”. The ethernet frame field is used by an ethernet card which is a piece of hardware within the firewall that manages access to the network. FIG. 4 shows a schematic  70  of a prior art data packet with an ethernet frame field. The contents of the data packet are similar to what was previously described in FIG. 2. The data packet includes three segments: a header  72 ; a body  74 ; and a trailer  76 . The header  72  segment includes: a flag  78   a ; an address field  80 ; and a control field  82 . The trailer  76  segment includes: a sequence check field  84  and a flag  78   b . Additionally, two segments of the ethernet frame field  86   a  and  86   b  are included immediately in front of the first flag  78   a  and immediately following the second flag  78   b  respectively.  
           [0011]    The ethernet frame field  86   a  and  86   b  is simply a protocol for processing the packet. Like the data packet, its contents are changed when it leaves the firewall. Specifically, the firewall adds its specific media access controller (“MAC”) address to frame field  86   a  and  86   b . The MAC address is a layer of the ISO/OSI (International Organization for Standardization/Open Systems Interconnection) reference model. The ISO/OSI model separates computer to computer communication into seven protocol layers. The ethernet card and the MAC are parts of one of the lower layers of this model and they manage access to the physical network.  
           [0012]    One prior art solution is to make a firewall more difficult to detect (a “stealth firewall”). FIG. 5 shows a flow chart  90  of a prior art network stealth firewall protection scheme. As shown previously in FIG. 3, a packet is first received at the firewall  92  from the network exterior  20 . However, a stealth firewall conducts a different type of handshake protocol  94 . A stealth firewall does not decrement the time-to-live field of the packet. Consequently, anyone monitoring the status of the packets in the network exterior  20  will not be able to see the stealth firewall due to a change in the value of the time-to-live field. After the stealth handshake  94 , the stealth firewall analyzes the packet  96  in a similar manner as previously described for reference number  56  in prior art FIG. 3. If the packet is authorized, it is forwarded on to the network destination by the firewall  98 . If the packet is not authorized, it is denied access to the network  100 . However, the firewall does not respond to the sender with any type of message indicating a denial of access. Instead, the stealth firewall simply drops the packet  102 . The sender is prevented from detecting the stealth firewall by finding any indication of its presence in a decremented time-to-live field or a denial of access message.  
           [0013]    However, a stealth firewall may still be detected by the changes it makes to the packet during its handshake protocol  94 . Specifically, a stealth firewall leaves its own MAC address in the packet as it conducts the stealth handshake protocol  94 . Once the presence of the stealth firewall is detected through the MAC address, a hacker can then begin to probe the firewall and attempt to find a way around it to gain access to the network. In order to prevent attacks by hackers on a firewall, it is necessary to make the firewall undetectable to parties outside the network.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0014]    In some aspects, the present invention relates to a method of preventing unauthorized access to a computer system, comprising: receiving a data packet at a firewall; copying the data packet at the firewall; analyzing the data packet with the firewall to determine if the data packet is authorized to access the computer system; sending an authorized data packet to the computer system; and denying access of an unauthorized data packet to the computer system.  
           [0015]    In other aspects, the present invention relates to a method of preventing unauthorized access to a computer system, comprising: step of receiving data; step of passively copying the data; step of analyzing the data for authorization to access the computer system; and step of allowing access to the computer system for authorized data; and step of denying access to the computer system for unauthorized data.  
           [0016]    In other aspects, the present invention relates to a method of remotely managing a firewall, comprising: receiving a control data packet at the firewall from a remote location; copying the control data packet at the firewall; analyzing the control data packet to determine if the control data packet is authorized to access the firewall; and allowing an authorized control data packet to control the firewall.  
           [0017]    In other aspects, the present invention relates to a method of remotely managing a firewall, comprising: step of receiving control data at the firewall from a remote location; step of copying the control data; step of analyzing the control data to determine if the control data is authorized to access the firewall; and step of allowing authorized control data to access the firewall.  
           [0018]    Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0019]    [0019]FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a prior art network with a firewall.  
         [0020]    [0020]FIG. 2 shows a schematic of a prior art data packet.  
         [0021]    [0021]FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of a prior art network firewall protection scheme.  
         [0022]    [0022]FIG. 4 shows a schematic of a prior art data packet with an Ethernet frame.  
         [0023]    [0023]FIG. 5 shows a flow chart of a prior art network stealth firewall protection scheme.  
         [0024]    [0024]FIG. 6 shows a flow chart of one embodiment of network firewall protection in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0025]    [0025]FIG. 7 shows a flow chart of an alternative embodiment of network firewall protection in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0026]    [0026]FIG. 8 shows a firewall network with an external controller in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.  
         [0027]    [0027]FIG. 9 shows a flow chart of one embodiment of external network control of a firewall in accordance with the present invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0028]    An undetectable firewall for network protection has been developed. FIG. 6 shows a flow chart  110  of one embodiment of network firewall protection in accordance with the present invention. First, a packet is received at the firewall  112  from the network exterior  20 . The embodiment of the present invention conducts a “passive copying”  114  of the packet. After the packet is passively copied  114 , the firewall analyzes the packet to determine whether or not it is acceptable to forward on to its destination in the network  116 . The firewall analyzes the packet by the pattern matching technique, protocol analysis, or any other suitable technique that is known in the art. If the packet is acceptable, it is passed on through to the network  118 . If the packet is not acceptable, access to the network is denied  120  and the packet is dropped  122  with no denial of access message being sent to the source of the packet. As a result, there is no detectable response to the sender of denied access from the firewall.  
         [0029]    The passive copying  114  by the firewall of the packet is a low level operation that does not change the contents of the packet. No address exists for the firewall. Consequently, no address from the firewall is added to the packet, including the MAC address. Instead, the firewall allows the ethernet frame field along with the source address and other information of the packet to stay the same as when it was received by the firewall. The copied ethernet frame field is then used to transport the data packet. Additionally, the time-to-live field is not decremented by the firewall because the protocol of the operating system that requires decrementing is ignored. The entire contents of the packet, including the header with its address and control fields are exactly the same as when the packet was received by the firewall. Consequently, any party outside the network will not be able to detect the presence of the firewall by examining the contents of the packet or the ethernet frame field.  
         [0030]    [0030]FIG. 7 shows a flow chart  130  of an alternative embodiment of network firewall protection in accordance with the present invention. As in FIG. 6, a packet is received at the firewall  132  from the network exterior  20 . The embodiment of the present invention conducts a “passive copying”  134  of the packet. This passive copying is the essentially the same as described previously for FIG. 6. After the packet is passively copied  134 , the firewall analyzes the packet to determine whether or not it is acceptable to forward on to its destination in the network  136 . The firewall analyzes the packet by the pattern matching technique, protocol analysis, or any other suitable technique that is known in the art. If the packet is acceptable, it is passed on through to the network  138 . If the packet is not acceptable, access to the network is denied  140  and the packet is dropped  142  with no denial of access message being sent to the source of the packet. As a result, there is no detectable response to the sender of a denied from the firewall. Additionally, after the denial of access  140  and dropping the packet  142 , the attempted intrusion into the network is logged  144 . In alternative embodiments, the logging could be done before or simultaneous to dropping the packet  142 .  
         [0031]    The logging of the attempted access offers several possible actions available to network administrators. The logs of attempts of unauthorized access could be forwarded on to the authorities for further investigation. Also, if the packets are part of a “denial of service” attack, the data could be routed back to the attacker. Typically, a denial of service attack involves a multitude of requests to the network in such volume that it effectively shuts the network down.  
         [0032]    In alternative embodiments, the firewall could be located in front of various segments of the network instead of only at the connection to the network exterior. This would provide protection not just from the network exterior, but also from other parts of the network. It also provides backup security should another firewall fail. The firewall could also be used to protect other network components such as routers and switches as well as the end users themselves.  
         [0033]    In addition to protecting against unauthorized intrusion, the present invention may also be used to remotely control and mange the firewall. FIG. 8 shows a firewall network with an external controller  150  in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The network  150  is similar to the prior art network previously described in FIG. 1. The network  150  includes a series of users  152   a -  152   d  that are linked and controlled through a server  154 . The device could also be a router or a switch for the network. A firewall  156  is installed between the server  154  and the network exterior  20 . The server  154 , the firewall  156 , and the exterior  20  are interconnected through a single line  158 . The single line  158  prevents outsiders from accessing the network except through the firewall  156 . In addition, an external controller  160  is shown in the network exterior  20 . The controller  160  is used to remotely manage the firewall by a user such as a system administrator.  
         [0034]    The controller  160  contacts the firewall  156  through the data line from the network exterior. The controller uses a technique known as “spoofing” to establish contact with the controller  160 . Spoofing involves sending a transmission that appears to be coming from another source in order to hide the identity of the sender. Typically, this is done by embedding the address of the phony source in the data packet. In this embodiment of the invention, the controller  160  sends a command packet that is intended for the firewall  156  to some address destination behind the firewall. Inside the command packet is a password as well as command instructions to control the firewall  156 . While a password is used in this embodiment, other embodiments could use other types of identification that are known in the art. Additionally, both the source address and the MAC address of the external controller  160  are spoofed to appear that they are coming from another source besides the external controller  160 . Once the command packet is received at the firewall  156 , the firewall conducts its passive copying of the packet and it searches for the password. If the password is found, the command packet is allowed to access the firewall  156 . After access is allowed, the command data packet from the controller  160  is dropped without a trace.  
         [0035]    [0035]FIG. 9 shows a flow chart  170  of one embodiment of external network control of a firewall in accordance with the present invention. As in FIGS. 6 and 7, a packet is received at the firewall  172  from the network exterior  20 . The embodiment of the present invention conducts passive copying  174  of the packet. This passive copying is the essentially the same as described previously for FIGS. 6 and 7. After the packet is passively copied  174 , the firewall analyzes the packet to determine whether or not it is acceptable to forward on to its destination in the network  176 . The firewall analyzes the packet by the pattern matching technique, protocol analysis, or any other suitable technique that is known in the art. If the packet is not acceptable, access to the network is denied  178  and the packet is dropped  180  with no denial of access message being sent to the source of the packet. As a result, there is no detectable response to the sender of denied access from the firewall. In other embodiments, after the denial of access  178  and dropping the packet  180 , the attempted intrusion into the network could be logged as previously described in FIG. 7. In alternative embodiments, the logging could be done before or simultaneous to dropping the packet  180 .  
         [0036]    If the packet is authorized to access the network, it is examined for a password that indicates it is from the external controller  182 . If no password is found, the packet is sent on to its network destination  184 . If the password is found, the packet is allowed to access the firewall  186  and its command instructions are implemented. Finally, the packet is dropped by the firewall  188 . In alternative embodiments, the packet could be examined for the password of the external controller  182  either before or simultaneously with the analysis of the data for proper authorization  176  to access the network.  
         [0037]    This technique of managing a firewall provides security for several reasons. First, the firewall leaves no trace of its presence in the command packet by passively copying its contents. Also, the external controller leaves no trace of its origin by spoofing its address. Additionally, the command packet hides its true destination because it appears to be addressed to a destination behind the firewall. Finally, after the command packet accesses the firewall and its command instructions are received, it is dropped without a trace. Consequently, the firewall and its control mechanisms are hidden from any unauthorized parties who may be monitoring or intercepting network traffic.  
         [0038]    While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed here. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.