Abstract:
A method, system, and computer program product to test a semiconductor device are described. The method includes receiving a set of test patterns for testing the semiconductor device and a user selecting a subset of the set of test patterns. The method also includes cataloging a content of pattern files associated with the subset of the set of test patterns to generate a catalog, and processing the catalog to output test data to the semiconductor device.

Description:
BACKGROUND 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to testing of a semiconductor device, and more specifically, to automated selective testing of a semiconductor device. 
         [0002]    When a semiconductor design such as for a wafer, module, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or very large scale integrated circuit (VLSI) is tested, the testing involves a set of commercially available test patterns specific to the product under test. The commercially available test pattern generator output is made platform specific by an on-site test pattern processor that may support several test system platforms, for example. While the test pattern generator provides an efficient source for comprehensive testing of the product, the processing of all the test patterns can become time-consuming. At various stages of development, quick feedback from testing is important to determine, for example, new patterns that must be tested to isolate any issues. Thus the time associated with the test pattern processor processing all the test patterns may present issues. 
       SUMMARY 
       [0003]    According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method of testing a semiconductor device includes receiving, at a pattern processor from a test pattern generator, a set of test patterns for testing the semiconductor device; selecting, by a user, a subset of the set of test patterns; cataloging, by the pattern processor, a content of pattern files associated with the subset of the set of test patterns to generate a catalog; and processing, by the pattern processor, the catalog to output test data to the semiconductor device. 
         [0004]    Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with the advantages and the features, refer to the description and to the drawings. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0005]    The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The forgoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which: 
           [0006]      FIG. 1  is a process flow of a method of generating tests for a device under test according to embodiments of the invention; 
           [0007]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram of a pattern processor according to an embodiment of the invention; and 
           [0008]      FIG. 3  is a process flow of an exemplary test mode by the pattern processor according to an embodiment of the invention. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0009]    As noted above, the processing of all the test patterns provided by a commercially available test pattern generator can be time consuming and inefficient. Test patterns may be used in many sectors of a product&#39;s final test including, for example, power-on, engineering product bring-up, design verification, test coverage, yield analysis, characterization, diagnosis, burn-in, and manufacturing final test. During each of the stages, turn around time (TAT) of the testing plays a major role in determining feasibility, capability, manufacturability, and functionality of a design. In fact, the time and data volume associated with the processing can be one of the most critical items affecting the usefulness of testing designs and test patterns. Embodiments of the system and method described herein facilitate processing of a subset of the test patterns. Embodiments of the invention also facilitate selection of American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) rather than binary test pattern files. 
         [0010]      FIG. 1  is a process flow of a method of generating tests for a device under test according to embodiments of the invention. At block  101 , a user testing the device under test (DUT) may submit a selection of an initial test mode  130 . A test mode  130  defines a subset of test patterns for processing by a pattern processor  110 . There may be information embedded in the selected initial test mode  130  that specifies an expanded subset of test patterns. In alternate embodiments, the user specifies a test mode  130  defining a subset of test patterns in ASCII or binary pattern files. The user may also elect to process only newly released test patterns. At  102 , the test pattern generator  120  provides all the test patterns to the pattern processor  110 . At  103 , the pattern processor  110  processes only the subset of test patterns that are specified by the user (e.g., based on selected test mode  130 ). Processing by the pattern processor  110  at  103  includes the pattern processor  110  cataloging only the subset of test patterns that are based on the user selection of test mode. This decreased cataloging (as compared to cataloging the full set of test patterns) holds true for embodiments that include user selection of a test mode  130  or test patterns in ASCII as well as binary format. Cataloging includes listing the contents of the pattern files that are part of the selection. In the case of an ASCII format selection by the user, the pattern processor  110  may directly process ASCII test patterns provided by the test pattern generator  120 . 
         [0011]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram of a pattern processor  110  according to an embodiment of the invention. The pattern processor  110  includes one or more processors  112 , one or more memory devices  115 , an input interface  117 , and an output interface  119 . The pattern processor  110  receives input from the test pattern generator  120  (complete set of all test patterns) and the user (e.g., test mode  130  selection) through the input interface  117 . The one or more processors  112  use instructions stored in the one or more memory devices  115  to catalog only the selected test pattern files and process the test patterns of the selected test patterns to generate the output for the DUT. This output is specific to the platform of the DUT. The memory device  115  stores instructions that facilitate the association between a user selected test mode  130  and a subset of the test patterns from the test pattern generator  120 . For example, the correspondence between a user-identified test mode  130  and a subset of test patterns may be stored in the memory device  115  in the form of a look up table or in another format. Test modes  130  may be added or modified as needed in the pattern processor  110 . A number of test modes  130  may be selected in turn to complete a full test at a particular stage for the DUT. The catalog generated by the processor  112  may be stored in the memory device  115 , as well. 
         [0012]      FIG. 3  is a process flow of an exemplary test mode  130  by the pattern processor  110  according to an embodiment of the invention. At block  310 , the input interface  117  of the pattern processor  110  receives the full set of patterns from the pattern generator  120 . The input interface  117  also receives the user selected test mode  130  as the logic test mode. As noted above, the user selection of the test mode  130  may be in binary or ASCII format. Other exemplary test modes  130  include the array test mode or the selection of one or more chips, for example. Each test mode  130  may have some number of test patterns associated with it (e.g., 10 patterns). The test mode  130  puts the DUT in a particular state to test the portion of the DUT identified by the test mode  130 . That is, for example, the logic test mode puts the DUT in a state in which the logic of the DUT may be tested by the test platform. At block  320 , the processor  112  of the pattern processor  110 , in conjunction with the memory device  115 , determines the subset of test patterns (among the full set of tests patterns received from the test pattern generator  120 ) corresponding with the logic test mode selected by the user. The processor  112  then catalogues and processes only the subset of test patterns. At block  330 , the output interface  119  of the pattern processor  110  outputs, to the DUT, platform-specific test patterns that test the logic (the selected test mode  130 ). 
         [0013]    The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof. 
         [0014]    The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated 
         [0015]    The flow diagrams depicted herein are just examples. There may be many variations to this diagram or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention. 
         [0016]    While the preferred embodiment to the invention had been described, it will be understood that those skilled in the art, both now and in the future, may make various improvements and enhancements which fall within the scope of the claims which follow. These claims should be construed to maintain the proper protection for the invention first described.