Abstract:
The present invention teaches the composition of terminally modified, amino, polyether, siloxanes, known henceforth as amino siloxane alkokylates, and their use as adjuvants. The amino siloxane alkoxylates of the present invention enhance the efficacy of agrichemicals on plants as compared to conventional TSE&#39;s alone. The amino siloxane alkoxylates have at one end, an amine functionality and at the other end, a polyalkyleneoxide functionality.

Description:
This is a continuation of application U.S. Ser. No. 09/209,061 filed Dec. 10, 1998 now Pat. No. 6,238,684. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Many herbicides require the addition of an adjuvant to the spray mixture to provide wetting and spreading on foliar surfaces. Often that adjuvant is a surfactant, which can perform a variety of functions, such as increasing spray droplet retention on difficult to wet leaf surfaces, or to provide penetration of the herbicide into the plant cuticle. These adjuvants are provided either as a tankside additive or used as a component in herbicide formulations. 
     Gaskin, et al., ( Pestic. Sci.  1993, 38, 185-192) demonstrated that some trisiloxane ethoxylates (TSE), such as Silwet L-77® surfactant (available from OSi Specialties, Inc. of Greenwich, Conn.), can antagonize cuticular penetration of a herbicide into grasses, when compared to the herbicide alone. The term antagonism is used to indicate that the treatment of herbicide plus adjuvant is less effective than the comparative herbicide treatment. 
     Gaskin, et al., ( Pest. Sci.  1993, 38, 192-200) showed that this antagonism can be mitigated if the number of ethylene oxide (EO) units contained in the TSE is increased to 17 or more; however, superspreading of the TSE is reduced dramatically once the degree of ethoxylation exceeds about 12 EO, and TSE&#39;s containing the higher EO adducts show spreading properties similar to conventional nonsilicone surfactants. 
     Sandbrink, et al., ( Pest. Sci.  1993, 38, 272-273) published that a TSE antagonized glyphosate performance relative to glyphosate alone in the control of  Panicum maximum  Jacq. Snow, et. al.,  Langmuir,  1993, 9, 424-30, discusses the physical properties and synthesis of novel cationic siloxane surfactants. These siloxanes are based on the reaction of a chloropropyl modified trisiloxane with an alkanolamine, such as N-methylethanolamine, which was further reacted with a halide to make a quaternary surfactant. 
     Petroff, et al., (EP 92116658) describes the use of cationic, quaternary trisiloxanes to enhance the efficacy of glyphosate on velvetleaf, a broadleaf weed. Henning, et al., (DE4318537) describes cationic siloxanyl modified polyhydroxy hydrocarbon or carbohydrate for use with plant protection agents. These compounds are derived from a saccharide containing 1 to 10 pentose and/or hexose units, modified with a quaternary ammonium group, and a siloxane moiety. 
     Reid, et al., (U.S. Pat. No. 3,389,160) describes amino modified siloxane alkoxylates where the amino functionality appears as the terminal group on the alkyleneoxide moiety, opposite the siloxane group. 
     Policello in PCT WO 97/32475 discloses amino modified siloxanes wherein the amine is bound by an ether bond to the siloxane backbone wherein the amine may be terminal or pendant to the backbone. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention teaches the composition of terminally modified, amino, polyether, siloxanes, known henceforth as amino siloxane alkokylates, and their use as adjuvants. The amino siloxane alkoxylates of the present invention enhance the efficacy of agrichemicals on plants as compared to conventional TSE&#39;s alone. Optionally, the amino siloxane alkoxylates of this invention may be blended with conventional trisiloxane alkoxylates. Blends of these unique amino siloxanes with more traditional trisiloxane alkoxylates (TSA) provide superspreading properties, on difficult to wet surfaces, that are equal to, or greater than what is contributed by the individual components. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     These compositions are especially useful in overcoming the antagonistic effects on pesticide efficacy associated with superspreading, TSAs. Mixtures of the compositions of the present invention with TSAs provide enhanced spreading properties relative to the individual components alone. In addition, these products provide a low aqueous surface tension (≦25 mN/m at 0.1 wt %), which is desirable for enhanced spreading of pesticide solutions. 
     Composition 
     The amino siloxane alkoxylates of the present invention have the average general formula: 
     
       
         ZMe 2 SiO[(Me) 2 SiO] x  SiMe 2 Q, 
       
     
     wherein x=0 to 2, preferably 1, Q=C a H 2a O(C 2 H 4 O) b (C 3 H 6 O) c R, a=2 to 4, preferably 3, b=1 to 12, preferably 3 to 8, c=0 to 5, providing that when c is&gt;0, (b+c)=2 to 12, preferable=4 and 8, R is hydrogen, acetyl or a hydrocarbon radical between 1 and 4 carbon atoms, Z is BN[DO(C d H 2d O) e R] 2−Z V z  each d is 2 to 4, preferably 2 to 3, each e is 0 to 15, preferably 0 to 8, z=0 to 2, preferably 2, each V is a univalent group, D is an alkylene divalent bridging group on which there may be hydroxyl substituents, and B is a divalent bridging group. 
     V groups preferably are alkyl (which may be branched, linear or cyclic) of less than 8 carbons, which may or may not contain hydroxyl functionalities. Another preferred V is an alkyl amine functionality, the nitrogen of which may be further substituted (e.g. with an alkyl) or be further alkoxylated. Exemplary V are ethyl, 2-hydroxyethyl, 3-hydroxypropyl, methyl, and 2-aminoethyl. 
     B groups may be of the formula D(O) y (C d H 2d O) j D wherein D and d are as above, j=0 to 8, preferably 0 to 2, and y=0 or 1. Preferably D has 2 to 6 carbon atoms. B may also preferably be a divalent alkylene group of C 2 -C 4 . 
     When Q or B is a mixture of oxyalkylenes, it may be blocked or random. One skilled in the art will understand the advantages in the position of the oxyethylene relative to the oxypropylene, when the alkyleneoxide group is blocked. 
     The Z groups may include protonated amines, i.e, where there is a hydrogen ion attached to the nitrogen in the Z group, which can occur to the amino siloxane alkoxylates under acidic conditions. Also contemplated herein are quaternary versions of Z, i.e., where there is a third R 3  group on the nitrogen in Z, but said quaternary compounds are not preferred for use in the present invention. 
     Preferred Z structures are wherein R is hydrogen or methyl, D is a divalent organic group of 2 to 4 carbons, B is a divalent organic group of 2 to 4 carbons, in which at least one carbon radical contains a hydroxyl group, and V is 2-hydroxyethyl, 2-hydroxypropyl, 3-hydroxypropyl, propyl, ethyl or methyl. Preferred amino siloxane alkoxylates are trisiloxanes. 
     In addition the compositions of the present invention optionally may include nonionic siloxane alkoxylates of the general formula: 
     
       
         R 4 Me 2 SiO[MeSi(G)O] g SiMe 2 R 4    
       
     
     wherein g=0 to 2, preferably 1. 
     
       
         G=C a H 2a O(C 2 H 4 O) t (C 3 H 6 O) w R. 
       
     
     and R are as above, t=3 to 12, preferably 4 to 8 
     w=0 to 8, providing that when w is &gt;0, (t+w) is preferably between 5 and 12. R 4  is G, or an alkyl of one to four carbons. The preferred nonionic siloxane alkoxylates are trisiloxane alkoxylates, where g=1, d=3, t=4 to 8, w=0, R 4  is Me, R is H or Me. 
     The compositions of the present invention also optionally include ingredients for use herein are pesticides, especially acid functionalized ones, i.e., compounds that contain at least one carboxylic, sulfonic or phosphonic acid group or their salt or ester. The term pesticide means any compound used to destroy pests, e.g., rodenticides, fungicides, and herbicides. Illustrative examples of pesticides which can be employed include, but are not limited to, growth regulators, photosynthesis inhibitors, pigment inhibitors, mitotic disrupters, lipid biosynthesis inhibitors, cell wall inhibitors, and cell membrane disrupters. The amount of pesticide employed in compositions of the invention varies with the type of pesticide employed. More specific examples of pesticide compounds that can be used with the compositions of the invention are: phenoxy acetic acids, phenoxy propionic acids, phenoxy butyric acids, benzoic acids, triazines and s-triazines, substituted ureas, uracils, bentazon, desmedipham, methazole, phenmedipham, pyridate, amitrole, clomazone, fluridone, norflurazone, dinitroanilines, isopropalin, oryzalin, pendimethalin, prodiamine, trifluralin, glyphosate, sulfonylureas, imidazolinones, clethodim, diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, quizalofop, sethoxydim, dichlobenil, isoxaben, and bipyridylium compounds. 
     Manufacture 
     The amino siloxane alkoxylates of the present invention may be made by the hydrosilation of a terminal hydridosiloxane with allyl glycidal ether, and allyl started polyalkyleneoxide. This is followed by ring opening of the epoxide moiety with a primary or secondary amine. The components described are available commercially and may be made as known in the art. Alternatively, the hydrosilation may take place with an allyl amine and an allyl started polyalkyleneoxide. Hydrosilation reaction conditions may be found in Marcienic, ed., 122-23 and 558-568 (1995), which is incorporated herein. 
     The amine intermediate (e.g., allyl amine) may be prepared by reaction of an unsaturated halide (e.g., allyl bromide) and an amine. The allyl amine also may be prepared by reaction of an allyl glycidyl ether (or similar unsaturated epoxide) with an amine (which result in an ether bond in the bridging group B). An alternative method uses aziridine, which is not preferred for toxicity reasons, are disclosed in PCT US97/04128, which is incorporated herein by reference. 
     The hydrosilation products may be blends of the product of the present invention with amine terminated siloxanes and polyether terminated siloxanes. If desired, one may separate these, e.g., by distillation; however, these blends may be used without such purification. 
     The nonionic siloxane and the pesticides are available commercially and their manufacture is known in the art. 
     Use 
     The amino siloxane alkoxylates primarily are intended for use in the agricultural field as adjuvants for pesticide containing aqueous formulations. The composition of the present invention is useful as a tank side additive, or as a component in a herbicide formulation. In addition the compositions of the present invention are useful as adjuvants for other pesticides, such as, fungicides, insecticides, plant growth regulators, acaracides and the like. 
     The siloxanes are added directly to a spray tank along with an acid functional pesticide, or as part of a pesticide formulation. When used as a tankside additive, the amino siloxane alkoxylates are present at weight concentrations between 0.01% and 5.0%, preferably between 0.025% and 0.5%. Likewise, when the aminosiloxane alkoxylates are used in a pesticide formulation (In-can), they are present at weight concentrations that will deliver between 0.01% and 5.0% to the final use dilution, preferably between 0.025% and 0.5%, of the final use dilution. 
     It is noted that most dilutions will be made with water, but in the case of crop oil concentrates, oils will be the diluents. 
     When the compositions of the present invention are used in conjunction with a nonionic siloxane alkoxylate, the weight ratio of the nonionic siloxane alkoxylate to the amino siloxane alkoxylates is between 5:95 and 95:5, preferably between 5:95 and 40:60. The blend may be accomplished by physically mixing the two components together as a formulation, or by adding them separately to a spray mixture at point of use. 
     The amino siloxane alkoxylates also may be used generally as surface active agents in aqueous formulation where there is an acid functionalized component. The amino siloxane alkoxylates of the present invention also may be used generally as surface active agents, including, but not limited to, surfactants, wetting agents and softeners for textiles, as flowing and leveling agents in coatings, in hair care products, skin care and creams for personal care applications and as anti-static agents, detergents and softeners for laundry products. Other uses will be obvious to those of skill in the art. 
     Optionally, the amino siloxane alkoxylates may be blended with other nonionic, cationic or anionic co-surfactants, especially those with hydrophobez of C 5 -C 10  (short chain alkoxylates) and GEMINI surfactants (see WO 97/23281). 
    
    
     EXAMPLES 
     The following examples are presented to further illustrate and explain the present invention and should not be taken as limiting in any regard. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are by weight, and are based on the weight at the particular stage of the processing being described. 
     Example 1 
     a. Epoxy Siloxane Alkoxylates Intermediate: 
     25.0 g (0.1199 moles) of 1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane (&gt;97% by GC) was added to a 250 mL, 4 neck round bottom flask, equipped with a mechanical agitator, a Claisen adapter containing a reflux condenser and a thermometer (with Therm-o-Watch), a nitrogen bypass, and a 100 mL addition funnel containing 13.7 g, (0.1199 moles) of allyl glycidal ether (AGE). The 1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane was heated to 65° C. and catalyzed with 0.02 g of platinum catalyst. The AGE then was a added dropwise to the reaction mixture which exothermic to a maximum of 72° C. The temperature was maintained by the addition rate of the AGE, and supplemented as needed by a heating mantle. After all of the AGE was added, the temperature was adjusted to 80° C. At this point 10 g (0.0442 moles) of allylpolyethyleneoxide (Allyl=18.2 wt %, Moles EO=4) was added to the flask, along with an additional 0.03 g of platinum catalyst. The reaction exothermed to 82.9° C. within 5 minutes. At this point the temperature was adjusted to 90° C. and the remaining 25.24 g (0.1117 moles) of allylpolyethyleneoxide was added dropwise from the addition funnel to the flask contents. The temperature was maintained between 98° C. and 101° C. by the addition rate of the allylpolyethyleneoxide, and supplemented, as needed, by a heating mantle. Once all of the allylpolyethyleneoxide was added, the temperature was adjusted to 95° C. and stirred for 1 hour. The reaction mixture showed no traces of SiH when introduced to a fermentation tube containing KOH/water/ethanol solution. The product was cooled to 60° C. and treated with 4 g NaHCO 3 , and stirred for 1 hour. The mixture was filtered through a fine filter pad and stripped on a Rotovap for 1.5 hours at 70° C. and 1.0 mm Hg to afford a clear amber liquid with an epoxy content of 6.0 wt % (92.4% of theory based on initial charge). 
     b. Amino Siloxane Alkoxylate 
     The epoxy siloxane intermediate (55.0 g; 0.0825 moles), along with 11.28 g (0.1073 moles) of diethanolamine (corresponding to an 30% molar excess), and 28.4 g of 2-propanol (solvent), were added to a 250 mL. 4 neck round bottom flask, equipped with a mechanical agitator, a Claisen adapter containing a reflux condenser and a thermometer (with Therm-O-Watch). and a nitrogen bypass. The mixture was heated to 80° C., and catalyzed with 0.1 g titanium(IV) butoxide. The reaction time was approximately 6 hours, at which point the temperature was adjusted to 50° C., and 0.5 g water was added to deactivate the catalyst. Mixing time was approximately 1 hour. The product was then filtered through a fine filter pad and stripped on a Rotovap for 1.5 hours at 70° C. and 1.0 mm Hg to afford a clear amber liquid with a Brookfield viscosity of 257 cps at 21° C. (spindle SG-2, 60 rpm). 
     The structure for the amino siloxane alkoxylate was confirmed by  29 Si and  13 C NMR. The amino siloxane alkoxylate used here as an example, is shown as ASA-1, in Table 1. Other compositions of amino siloxane alkoxylates shown below were prepared according to this procedure. 
     Example 2 
     a. Composition Examples of Invention 
     Table 1 describe the amino siloxane alkoxylates used herein as illustrative examples of the compositions of the present invention. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Description of Amino Siloxane Alkoxylates 
               
               
                 
                   
                             
                     
                         
                         
                     
                   
                 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Re- 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 fer- 
               
               
                 ence 
                 X 
                 Q Group 
                 Z Group 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 ASA- 
                 1 
                 C 3 H 6 O(C 2 H 4 O) 4 H 
                 C 3 H 6 OCH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 NV 2   
               
               
                 1 
               
               
                 ASA- 
                 1 
                 C 3 H 6 O(C 2 H 4 O) 5 H 
                 C 3 H 6 OCH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 NV 2   
               
               
                 2 
               
               
                 ASA- 
                 1 
                 C 3 H 6 O(C 2 H 4 O) 5 (C 3 H 6 O) 2.5 H 
                 C 3 H 6 OCH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 NV 2   
               
               
                 3 
               
               
                 ASA- 
                 0 
                 C 3 H 6 O(C 2 H 4 O) 4 H 
                 C 3 H 6 OCH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 NV 2   
               
               
                 4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 V = —C 2 H 4 OH  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     b. Comparative Silicone Based Surfactants: 
     Table 2 provides structural information on two comparative trisiloxane alkoxylates that are commercially used as wetting agents for agrichemicals. These materials were prepared by standard hydrosilation of an allyl terminated polyether with an Si—H intermediate, such as heptamethyltrisiloxane. The SiH intermediates were prepared by acid equilibration as is known in the art. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                  Description of Conventional Trisiloxane Alkoxylates 
               
               
                 Me 3 SiO[MeSi(G)O] 1 SiMe 3   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Reference 
                 G Group 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Sil-A 
                 C 3 H 6 O(C 2 H 4 O) 8 CH 3   
               
               
                   
                 Sil-B 
                 C 3 H 6 O(C 2 H 4 O) 8 H 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     c. Comparative Nonsilicone Surfactants: 
     Table 3 provides descriptions of typical, comparative, nonsilicone surfactants, used as agricultural wetting agents. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Description of Comparative Conventional Nonsilicone Surfactants 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Reference 
                 Moles EO 
                 Remarks 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 OPE 
                 10 
                 Octylphenol ethoxylate (TRITON X-100) 
               
               
                   
                   
                 (Union Carbide Corp., Danbury, CT) 
               
               
                 TAE 
                 15 
                 Tallow amine ethoxylate 
               
               
                   
                   
                 (ETHOMEEN T/25) 
               
               
                   
                   
                 (Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc.; Chicago, IL) 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Example 3 
     Surface Tension 
     This example compares commonly used surfactants with the amino siloxane alkoxylate (ASA) compositions of the present invention for their ability to provide a reduction of the aqueous surface tension to values ≦25 mN/m, which is necessary for enhanced spreading, of pesticide solutions (Table 4). The aqueous surface tension was determined by the Wilhelmy plate method, using a sand blasted platinum blade as the sensor. Surfactant solutions (0.1 wt %) were prepared in 0.005 M sodium chloride solution either alone or as mixtures. The mixtures of the ASA component and SIL-B were prepared by blending 0.1 wt % solutions of the individual surfactants at a ratio of 80/20 (ASA/SIL-B). Therefore, Blend-1=ASA-1/SIL-B, Blend 2=ASA-2/SIL-B, Blend-3=ASA-3/SIL-B, and Blend-4=ASA-4/SIL-B (all at a ratio of 80/20). 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Comparison of Surface Tension Properties 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                 Composition of 
                 Surface (a)   
               
               
                   
                 Surfactant 
                 Invention 
                 Tension 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 ASA-1 
                 Yes 
                 23 
               
               
                   
                 ASA-2 
                 Yes 
                 24 
               
               
                   
                 ASA-3 
                 Yes 
                 23 
               
               
                   
                 ASA-4 
                 Yes 
                 25 
               
               
                   
                 Blend-1 
                 Yes 
                 21 
               
               
                   
                 Blend-2 
                 Yes 
                 20 
               
               
                   
                 Blend-3 
                 Yes 
                 21 
               
               
                   
                 Blend-4 
                 Yes 
                 20 
               
               
                   
                 Sil-A 
                 No 
                 21 
               
               
                   
                 Sil-B 
                 No 
                 21 
               
               
                   
                 OPE 
                 No 
                 29 
               
               
                   
                 TAB 
                 No 
                 41 
               
               
                   
                 None (b)   
                 N/A 
                 72 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   (a) Surface tension in mN/m at 25° C.  
               
               
                   
                   (b) Surface tension of water from CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; 63 Edition, 1982-1983.  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Example 4 
     In addition the compositions of the present invention provide enhanced spreading when combined with nonionic trisiloxane ethoxylates, meaning that the combination of the two components gives a greater degree of spreading then either of the components alone, at concentrations equivalent to that contained in the mixture (Table 5). 
     Spreading was determined by applying a 10 μL droplet of surfactant solution to a polyester film (3M, IR 1140 transparency film) and measuring the spread diameter after 30 seconds. The solution was applied with an automatic pipette to provide droplets of reproducible volume. Deionized water that was further purified with a Millipore filtration system was used to prepare the surfactant solutions. 
     To demonstrate the enhanced spreading observed with blends of the ASA components of this present invention and traditional nonionic trisiloxane ethoxylates, 0.1 wt % solutions of each component were prepared in distilled water. The solutions were blended in various ratios of the AMA component to SIL-B (See Table 5) to achieve the desired blend composition. For example, a blend consisting of 9.0 g ASA-1 (0.1 wt %) was combined with 1.0 g SIL-B (0.1 wt %) to afford a mixture that contained 0.09 wt % ASA-1, plus 0.01 wt % SIL-B (a 90/10 blend ratio). Likewise the comparative is SIL-B alone at concentrations equivalent to what is contained in the corresponding blend. For example, the comparative blend with SIL-B for the 90/10 ratio, combines 9.0 g distilled water with 1.0 g SIL-B. This yields 0.01 wt % SIL-B, which is equivalent to the amount contained in the 90/10 blend. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Spreading Properties of Amino Siloxane Alkoxylate/SIL-B Blends 
               
               
                 (0.1 wt % Blend) 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Compara- 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 tive 
               
               
                 Blend Ratio 
                 ASA-1 + 
                 ASA-2 + 
                 ASA-3 + 
                 ASA-4 + 
                 None + 
               
               
                 ASA/SIL-B 
                 SIL-B 
                 SIL-B 
                 SIL-B 
                 SIL-B 
                 SIL-B* 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 100/0 
                 11 
                  9 
                  8 
                 nd 
                 NA 
               
               
                 90/10 
                 13 
                 11 
                 10 
                 10 
                  8 
               
               
                 80/20 
                 25 
                 14 
                 14 
                 16 
                 17 
               
               
                 70/30 
                 36 
                 23 
                 27 
                 26 
                 17 
               
               
                 60/40 
                 30 
                 33 
                 30 
                 32 
                 28 
               
               
                 50/50 
                 45 
                 41 
                 30 
                 36 
                 34 
               
               
                 40/60 
                 44 
                 44 
                 44 
                 nd 
                 36 
               
               
                 0/100 
                 NA 
                 NA 
                 NA 
                 NA 
                 51 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 *None + SIL-B indicates that water was substituted for the ASA component to provide spreading contributed by SIL-B.  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Example 5 
     Nonionic trisiloxane alkoxylates have been shown to antagonize the uptake of glyphosate into grasses, giving a lower degree of uptake (Gaskin. et al.,  Pestic. Sci.  1993, 38, 185-192), or a lower degree of control then achieved with glyphosate treatments alone. The compositions of the present invention provide enhanced glyphosate activity on grasses relative to trisiloxane ethoxylates or glyphosate alone. 
     The effect of adjuvant on glyphosate isopropylamine salt (Gly-IPA) efficacy was determined using a barnyardgrass assay. Barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crus - galli ) was crown in the lab under fluorescent growth lights, and trimmed 11 days after planting, from 9 cm to 4 cm. When the plants reached to 8-9 cm in height (3 days after trimming) they were treated with spray solutions containing either glyphosate alone, or with glyphosate (Gly-IPA at 1.0%, 0.5% and 0.25%), plus a surfactant at 0.1 wt %, using a spray volume of 96 l/ha. Efficacy was determined by visual observation of plant regrowth 2 weeks after treatment, using a rating system were 0 indicates no weed control, and 100% indicates complete control. 
     Table 6 provides the compositions for the various spray mixtures used to treat barnyardgrass in this example. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Surfactant Composition for Spray Treatments 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Wt % 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Treatment 
                 AMA-1 
                 SIL-B 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Treatment-1 
                 0.1 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-2 
                 0.08 
                 0.02 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-3 
                 0.07 
                 0.03 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-4 
                 0.06 
                 0.04 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-5 
                 0.05 
                 0.05 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-A 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-B 
                 0 
                 0.1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Table 7 demonstrates that the compositions of the present invention (Treatments 1-5 ) provide an overall significant enhancement to glyphosate response relative to glyphosate alone (Treatment-A), or to the comparative trisiloxane ethoxylate SIL-B (Treatment-B). 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 7 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 The Effect of Adjuvant on Glyphosate Efficacy on Barnyardgrass 
               
               
                 14 Days After Treatment 
               
               
                 Percent Barnyardgrass Control 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Glyphosate Rate 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Treatment 
                 1.0% 
                 0.5% 
                 0.25% 
                 Mean 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-1 
                 77.5 a 
                 42.5 b 
                 36.3 a 
                 52.1 a 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-2 
                 38.8 b 
                 75.0 a 
                 36.3 a 
                 50.0 a 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-3 
                 80.0 a 
                 42.5 b 
                 23.3 a 
                 48.6 a 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-4 
                 73.3 a 
                 42.5 b 
                 7.5 b 
                 41.1 a 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-5 
                 36.3 a 
                 33.3 c 
                 5.3 b 
                 24.9 b 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-A 
                  8.7 c 
                 28.0 c 
                  1.0 b 
                 12.3 c 
               
               
                   
                 Treatment-B 
                  8.8 c 
                   5.0 d 
                  3.0 b 
                  5.6 c 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Data with different letters indicate a statistically different result. Data with common letters are not statistically different according to Tukey test (p = 0.05).  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Data with different letters indicate a statistically different result. Data with common letters are not statistically different according to Tukey test (p=0.05). 
     Example 6 
     Barnyardgrass (BYG) was treated with glyphosate-isopropylamine salt (0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0%) using 0.1 wt % ASA-1, alone or as mixtures with SIL-B. The applications were made using a spray volume of 103 l/ha. Simulated rainfall (0.25 in.) was applied 2 h after treatment to remove any glyphosate that was not absorbed by the BYG. This was done to determine how effective the treatments were at making glyphosate rainfast (resistant to wash-off), which is associated with the rapid uptake of chemical into the plants. Efficacy was determined by visual observation of plant regrowth 2 weeks after treatment, using a rating system were 0 indicates no weed control, and 100% indicates complete control. 
     Table 8 indicates that the ASA-1 and its blends with SIL-B are more effective at enhancing glyphosate efficacy on BYG than SIL-B. As anticipated. SIL-B demonstrated the classical antagonism of glyphosate efficacy on grass species, when used with glyphosate rates below 1 wt %. However, even the treatment at 1 wt % glyphosate plus SIL-B, the enhancement in efficacy was not statistically different form glyphosate alone. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 8 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Effect of Adjuvant on Glyphosate-IPA Efficacy on Barnyardgrass 
               
               
                 (2 Wks after treatment) 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 % Glyphosate 
               
             
          
           
               
                 % ASA-1 
                 1.0 
                 0.5 
                 0.25 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 100  
                 99.5 a 
                 87.5 a 
                 68.75 a 
               
               
                 80 
                 83.25 b 
                 76.75 a 
                 31.25 bc 
               
               
                 70 
                 92.25 b 
                 60.0 a 
                 32.5 bc 
               
               
                 60 
                 92.0 b 
                 77.5 a 
                 17.5 c 
               
               
                 50 
                 92.5 ab 
                 81.0 a 
                 51.25 ab 
               
               
                  0 
                 57.5 c 
                 7.5 b 
                 8.75 c 
               
               
                 (100% SIL-B) 
                 27.5 c 
                 16.25 b 
                 15.3 c 
               
               
                 No Surfactant 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Note: Mean followed by same letter, within the same column, is not significantly different by Tukey test (p = 0.05).