Abstract:
In a first aspect, a lithography apparatus may comprise a mask designed using optical proximity correction (OPC), a pulsed laser source, and an active bandwidth control system configured to increase the bandwidth of a subsequent pulse in response to a measured pulse bandwidth that is below a predetermined bandwidth range and increase a bandwidth of a subsequent pulse in response to a measured pulse bandwidth that is above the predetermined bandwidth range. In another aspect an active bandwidth control system may include an optic for altering a wavefront of a laser beam in a laser cavity of the laser source to selectively adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal. In yet another aspect, the bandwidth of a laser having a wavelength variation across an aperture may be actively controlled by an aperture blocking element that is moveable to adjust a size of the aperture.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
   The present invention relates to lasers. The present invention is particularly, but not exclusively useful for providing a laser output having a bandwidth that is controlled within a pre-selected range. 
   BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   Pulsed lasers, such as KrF excimer lasers, ArF excimer lasers and molecular fluorine (F 2 ) lasers, are often used in conjunction with a lithography tool to selectively expose a photoresist in a semiconductor wafer fabrication process. In these processes, the mask and optics in the lithography tool are typically optimized for a particular laser wavelength. More specifically, the tool is typically optimized for a particular center wavelength. For a variety of reasons, the center wavelength of the light exiting the laser may drift over time and, thus, a feedback network may be employed to detect the center wavelength exiting the laser and modify one or more laser parameters to correct the wavelength as necessary. 
   Recently, optical proximity correction (OPC) has been employed to more exactly obtain a desired exposure pattern on the resist by selectively changing the sizes and shapes of corresponding patterns on the mask. More specifically, OPC perturbs mask aperture shapes to systematically compensate for nonlinear feature distortions arising from optical diffraction and resist process effects. Common types of OPC may include: (1) the introduction of serifs, hammerheads and tomahawks in the mask pattern to reduce corner rounding and line-end shortening in the resist pattern; (2) the use of notches to control linewidth accuracy; and (3) the use of sub-resolution assist features (SRAFs, or scattering bars) for narrow gate geometries. 
   Heretofore, efforts have been drawn largely to reducing the spectral bandwidth of the light exiting the laser source to ever smaller dimensions. In short, large bandwidths have been troublesome because, as indicated above, lithography tool optics are generally designed for a specific center wavelength and chromatic doublets are generally unavailable at the wavelengths of interest, e.g., 248 for KrF sources and 193 nm for ArF sources. More recently, and more particularly with the recent use of OPC, the design rules used to generate complex masks require bandwidth stability rather than mere bandwidth reduction. As used herein, the term “bandwidth stability” means controlling bandwidth within a spectral range having both a maximum acceptable bandwidth value and a minimum acceptable bandwidth value. 
   In one type of arrangement used to measure the wavelength and spectral bandwidth of a laser, a portion of the emitted light is made incident upon an etalon. The etalon creates an interference fringe pattern having concentric bands of dark and light levels due to destructive and constructive interference by the laser light. The fringe pattern may then be optically detected by a sensitive photodetector array (PDA). In the fringe pattern, the concentric bands surround a center bright portion. The position of the bright center portion of the interference pattern can be used to determine wavelength to a relatively coarse degree, such as to within 5 picometers (pm). The diameter of a light band is then used to determine the wavelength of the laser output to a fine degree, such as to within 0.01-0.03 pm. Also, the width of a light band may be used to determine the spectral bandwidth of the laser output. 
   In one method commonly used to characterize spectral bandwidth, the bandwidth at 50% peak intensity is measured. This definition of bandwidth is referred to as full width, half maximum (FWHM). Another definition of bandwidth, sometimes referred to as spectral purity, involves measuring a spectrum width where a selected percentage of the entire spectral energy is concentrated. For example, a common indicator is E95 which corresponds to the spectrum width where 95% of the entire spectral energy is concentrated. 
   Various methods can be used for wavelength tuning of lasers. Typically, the tuning takes place in a device referred to as a line narrowing package or line narrowing module. A typical technique used for line narrowing and tuning of excimer lasers is to provide a window at the back of the discharge cavity through which a portion of the laser beam passes into the line narrowing package. There, the portion of the beam is expanded in a beam expander and directed to an echelle grating that is aligned at a Littrow angle relative to the expanded beam. The grating reflects a narrow portion of the laser&#39;s untuned broader spectrum back into the discharge chamber where it is then amplified. With this arrangement, the laser can be tuned to a target center wavelength by changing the angle at which the beam illuminates the grating. This may be done by adjusting the position of the grating or providing a moveable mirror in the beam path. 
   Modern gas discharge lasers may be operable at a relatively high repetition rate, e.g., four to six kilohertz, and modem advancements are pushing this number higher. In a typically lithography procedure, the lithography tool may demand a burst of pulses, e.g., for exposing a particular mask position. As used herein, the term “burst of pulses” and its derivatives means a continuous train of pulses demanded by the lithography tool at the operable repetition rate of a discharge laser. A typical burst of pulses may include, but is not limited to, about 100-300 pulses. The termination of a burst of pulses may be achieved by terminating electrode discharge in the laser, the use of an appropriate shutter, or other suitable techniques known in the pertinent art. Thus, an active control system may alter a pulse characteristic within a burst of pulses by measuring a characteristic of a first pulse within the burst and using the measurement to alter a characteristic of at least one other pulse in the burst of pulses. 
   Typical industry specifications may require a laser output having an average center wavelength or average bandwidth (FWHM and/or E95) averaged over as a series of pulses referred to as a “pulse window”. A typical pulse window may be, for example, 30 pulses, and, in general, may be shorter than a “burst of pulses”. Thus, an active control system may alter a pulse characteristic within a pulse window by measuring a characteristic of a first pulse within the window and may be the measurement to alter a characteristic of at least one other pulse in the pulse window. Another level of active control is referred to as “pulse to pulse” control. In this technique, an active control system may measure a characteristic of a pulse and use the measurement to alter a characteristic of the very next pulse exiting the laser after the measured pulse. 
   With the above considerations in mind, Applicants disclose systems and methods for actively controlling the bandwidth of a laser during a burst of pulses. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   In a first aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a lithography apparatus for exposing a resist with a pre-selected pattern may comprise a mask designed using optical proximity correction (OPC) to produce the pre-selected pattern on the resist. For this aspect, the apparatus may include a laser source for generating a laser light beam for transmission through the mask to expose the resist and an instrument measuring laser bandwidth. In addition, the laser source may comprise an active bandwidth control system to increase a bandwidth of a subsequent pulse in response to a measured pulse bandwidth that is below a predetermined bandwidth range and decrease a bandwidth of a subsequent pulse in response to a measured pulse bandwidth that is above the predetermined bandwidth range. 
   In another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, an active bandwidth control system operable within a burst of pulses from a laser source may comprise an instrument to measure laser bandwidth and produce a control signal proportional to a measured bandwidth. Also, the active bandwidth control system may include an optic for altering a wavefront of a laser beam in a laser cavity of the laser source to selectively adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal. In one implementation, the optic is configured to alter coma. 
   In yet another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, an active bandwidth control system for a laser source which produces a laser beam having a wavelength variation across an aperture may comprise an instrument for measuring laser bandwidth and for producing a control signal proportional thereto. The control system may also include an aperture blocking element that is moveable to adjust a size of the aperture to selectively vary an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       FIG. 1  shows a simplified schematic view of lithography system having a laser source and a lithography tool including a mask designed with optical proximity correction; 
       FIG. 2  shows more detailed schematic view of an exemplary laser source having an active bandwidth control for use in the system shown in  FIG. 1 ; 
       FIG. 2A  is a sectional view showing discharge electrodes and arc direction as seen along line  2 A- 2 A in  FIG. 2 ; 
       FIG. 3  shows the variation of wavelength across an aperture normal to a beam path for a typical gas discharge laser; 
       FIG. 4  shows a detailed view of an aperture blocking element that is moveable to adjust a size of a beam path aperture to selectively vary an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal from a bandwidth measuring instrument; 
       FIG. 5  shows a detailed view of another embodiment of an aperture blocking element two plates that are simultaneously moveable to adjust a size of a beam path aperture to selectively vary an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal from a bandwidth measuring instrument; 
       FIGS. 6A-C  show an active bandwidth control system optic to selectively alter a laser beam wavefront in a laser cavity to adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal; 
       FIGS. 7A-C  show wavefront v. space diagrams for an undeformed wavefront ( FIG. 7A ), a wavefront having slight coma ( FIG. 7B ) and a wavefront having substantial coma ( FIG. 7C ); 
       FIGS. 8A-C  show wavelength v. intensity curves for an undeformed wavefront exiting a tuned laser cavity ( FIG. 8A ), a wavefront having slight coma exiting a tuned laser cavity ( FIG. 8B ) and a wavefront having substantial coma exiting a tuned laser cavity ( FIG. 8C ); and 
       FIGS. 9A-C  show another embodiment of an active bandwidth control system optic to selectively alter a laser beam wavefront in a laser cavity to adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
   With initial reference to  FIG. 1 , a lithography apparatus is shown and generally designated  20  which can be used, for example, to expose a selected pattern on a photoresist layer  22  that has been deposited on a wafer  24 . As shown, the primary components of the apparatus  20  include a laser source  26  and a lithography tool  28 , which may be a scanner, stepper, step and scan or any other suitable lithography tool known in the pertinent art. For the apparatus  20 , the laser source  26  may be a line-tuned gas discharge laser, e.g., a pulsed KrF excimer lasers, pulsed ArF excimer laser or pulsed molecular fluorine (F 2 ) laser having a line narrowing module, and may include one or more discharge chambers. In particular, the laser source  26  may include one or more oscillator chambers, so-called power oscillators (if laser seeded) and master oscillators (if unseeded), and may include one or more laser seeded amplifying chambers, so-called power amplifiers. Alternatively, as shown in  FIG. 2 , the laser source may have a single oscillating chamber  28 . 
   For the apparatus  20  shown in  FIG. 1 , a line-tuned, pulsed laser beam exits the laser source and is delivered to the lithography tool  28 . Within the lithography tool  28 , the beam passes through apertures (or transmissive elements) formed in a mask  30  and exposes a pattern on the photoresist layer  22 . Typically, the lithography tool  28  includes provisions to move the mask  30  and/or wafer  24  relative to the light beam, and in addition, may include projection optics  31  to reduce the size of the exposure pattern between the mask  30  and photoresist layer  22 . Moreover, in some, but not necessarily all, implementations of the apparatus  20 , the features, e.g., apertures/transmissive elements, of the mask  30  are designed to reduce optical proximity effects in a process widely known in the art as optical proximity correction (OPC). 
     FIG. 2  shows the laser source  26  in greater detail. As shown, the laser source may include a single resonant chamber  32  having an output coupler  34  at one end and a line narrowing module  36  at the other end. For the source  26 , the line narrowing module  36  may include a beam expander  38 , e.g., having one or more prisms as shown, a position-adjustable mirror  40  and an echelle grating  42  that is aligned at a Littrow angle relative to the expanded beam. In operation, the grating  42  reflects a narrow portion of the laser&#39;s untuned broader spectrum back into the gas discharge chamber, e.g., the portion of the resonant chamber between the chamber windows  44   a,b,  where the narrow spectrum portion is then amplified. With this arrangement, the laser can be tuned to a target center wavelength by changing the angle at which the incident beam illuminates the grating. 
   Within the discharge chamber, the laser source  26  may include a pair of spaced apart discharge electrodes  46   a,b  defining an arc direction  48  as shown in  FIG. 2A . With this arrangement, a beam having a somewhat rectangular shape is established having a length parallel to the arc direction and a width perpendicular thereto. For example, a typical excimer discharge laser may have a beam length of about 12 mm and a width of about 3 mm. In addition, for the tuned gas discharge laser source  26  shown, the wavelength may vary across the width of the beam, e.g., as shown in  FIG. 3 . More specifically, as seen in  FIG. 3 , the spectral distribution across the width of the beam can be broken into several, e.g., seven, spectral range sections  49   a - g  (note: each section  49  shown includes a spectral range of 100 fm) with the wavelength increasing gradually from the left side of  FIG. 3  to the right side of  FIG. 3 . 
     FIG. 2  also shows that the laser source  26  may include a wavemeter  50  (shown schematically in  FIG. 2 ) downstream of the output coupler  34  which receives a portion of the beam output from the coupler  34  via beamsplitter  52 . A shutter module  54  can also be provided downstream of the wavemeter  50 , as shown. For the laser source  26 , the wavemeter may measure one or more pulse characteristics, which may include but are not necessarily limited to: pulse energy, coarse central wavelength, fine central wavelength, FWHM bandwidth and E95 bandwidth. A suitable wavemeter for performing measurements, calculating one or more pulse characteristics and producing an output signal indicative thereof, e.g., over output cable  53 , is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,894,785 titled, “Gas Discharge MOPA Laser Spectral Analysis Module” which issued on May 17, 2005, and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,539,046 titled, “Wavemeter For Gas Discharge Laser” which issued on Mar. 25, 2003, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. In addition, techniques for calculating FWHM and E95 from wavemeter output data are disclosed in co-pending, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/615,321, filed on Jul. 7, 2003 and titled, “Optical Bandwidth Meter for Laser Light”, and co-pending, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/609,223, filed on Jun. 26, 2003 and titled, “Method and Apparatus for Measuring Bandwidth of an Optical Output of a Laser”, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other instruments known in the pertinent art for measuring bandwidth may be used. Wavemeters disclosed above may be capable of measuring characteristics, e.g., bandwidth, pulse energy, wavelength, of each pulse, even for high repetition rate lasers, e.g., 4-6 kHz, and may produce an output for each pulse, or may produce an output for a plurality of pulses, e.g., an average or some other statistical parameter. 
   The laser source  26  may also include, as part of an active bandwidth control system, an adjustable aperture blocking subsystem  56 , as shown schematically in  FIG. 2 . Although the adjustable aperture blocking subsystem  56  is shown positioned along the laser beam path between the discharge chamber window  44   a  and the line narrowing module  36 , it is to be appreciated that the adjustable aperture blocking subsystem  56  could be positioned at other locations along the beam path including, but not limited to: a position within the line narrowing module  36 , a position between the discharge chamber window  44   b  and the output coupler  34 , a position between the output coupler  34  and the beam splitter  52  for the wavemeter  50 , a position downstream of the beam splitter  52 . 
   Features of the subsystem  56  are shown in further detail in  FIG. 4 . As shown there, the subsystem  56  may include a fixed aperture  58 , which may have, for example, a fixed length, “L”, aligned with the arc direction  48  (see  FIG. 2 ) and a fixed width, “W”. Exemplary values for an excimer laser may be L=12 mm and W=3 mm. As indicated above, the wavelength may vary (e.g., be chirped) across the width of the beam, e.g., as shown in  FIG. 3 .  FIG. 2  shows that the subsystem  56  may include an actuator  60  coupled to an aperture blocking element, which for the embodiment shown may be, but is not necessarily limited to, a plate  62 . 
     FIG. 4  shows that the actuator  60  may receive a control signal via cable  61  from the wavemeter  50  (see  FIG. 2 ) or intermediary processor (not shown) and, in response, selectively move the plate  62  parallel to direction arrow  64  to partially block part of the beam and establish a temporary aperture width “w”, as shown. Thus, the plate  62  is moveable, back and forth, to adjust a size of the beam aperture to selectively vary an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal. For the subsystem  56 , the actuator  60  may include a motor, e.g., stepper motor, servo motor or the like, and/or may include an actuable material, e.g., piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, etc. In one implementation, a motor is employed in combination with an actuable material with the former providing coarse movement control and the later providing extremely rapid, fine movement control. 
     FIG. 5  shows another embodiment, designated generally adjustable aperture blocking subsystem  56 ′, which may form a part of an active bandwidth control system. The subsystem  56 ′ may include a fixed aperture  58 ′, and may include an actuator  60 ′ coupled to an aperture blocking element, which for the embodiment shown may be, but is not necessarily limited to, a pair of plates  62   a ′,  62   b ′. As shown, the plates  62   a ′,  62   b ′ may be coupled to the actuator  60 ′ by a linkage  66  configured to allow the plates  62   a ′,  62   b ′ to move simultaneously in opposite directions, e.g. a linkage having two arms and a pivot therebetween. Thus, both plates  62   a ′,  62   b ′ and be moved together toward each other to reduce the size of the temporary aperture “w&#39;” (reducing the bandwidth), or both plates  62   a ′,  62   b ′ and be moved together away from each other to enlarge the size of the temporary aperture “w&#39;” (increasing the bandwidth). Alternatively, a pair of actuators (not shown) may be provided, with each actuator independently controlling the movement of a respective plate. 
   Depending of the laser repetition rate, movements of the aperture blocking element may be on a pulse-to pulse basis, e.g., a movement preceding each pulse, or may occur near the end of a pulse window, e.g., 3-50 pulses, e.g. to establish a pulse window bandwidth average within a specified range. Thus, a pulse measurement output may be used to move the aperture blocking element prior to the very next pulse or a subsequent pulse. In some cases, movement of the aperture blocking element may occur near the end of a burst of pulses, e.g., to establish a bandwidth average for a burst of pulses that is within a pre-determined specified range. 
     FIG. 6A  shows another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, in which an active bandwidth control system may include an optic  200 , positioned along a laser beam path. The optic  200  may be configured to selectively alter a laser beam wavefront in the laser cavity, for example, to adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal, e.g., a control signal from the wavemeter  50  shown in  FIG. 2 . The optic  200  may be used in place of, or in addition to, the adjustable aperture blocking subsystem  56 ,  56 ′ describe above. 
   In greater structural detail, the optic  200  shown in  FIG. 6A  may include a positive cylindrical lens  202  and a negative cylindrical lens  204 . For the optic  200 , the positive cylindrical lens  202  and negative cylindrical lens  204  may constitute an afocal pair that is positioned along a beam path, and, the afocal pair may be centered on a laser axis  206  as shown in  FIG. 6A  to leave the wavefront of light passing through the optic  200  substantially unchanged. On the other hand, when the afocal pair is tilted, i.e., rotated about an axis  208  which is normal to the laser axis  206 , as shown in  FIG. 6B  for a rotation of about 2 degrees, the wavefront of light passing through the optic  200  will be altered. In one implementation, the pair is tilted about an axis  208  that is parallel to the length of the fixed aperture  58  (see  FIG. 4 ). Specifically, this wavefront deformation is illustrated by  FIGS. 7A-C , with  FIG. 7A  corresponding to  FIG. 6A  (no optic  200  rotation and no wavefront deformation),  FIG. 7B  corresponding to  FIG. 6B  (2 degrees optic  200  rotation and slight coma wavefront deformation), and  FIG. 7C  corresponding to  FIG. 6B  (3.5 degrees optic  200  rotation and pronounced coma wavefront deformation). Rotation of the optic  200  can be accomplished using a suitable optical mount and actuator (not shown) which may include, for example, a motor and/or an actuable material, e.g., piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, etc. 
   A comparison of  FIGS. 7A-C  with  FIGS. 8A-C  illustrates how rotation of the optic  200  can be used to selectively alter bandwidth within a laser cavity such as the laser cavity shown in  FIG. 2 . In this regard,  FIGS. 6A and 7A  correspond to  FIG. 8A . Specifically, with no optic  200  rotation and no wavefront deformation, a laser output is produced having a bandwidth curve  210  which can be describe by a lorentzian curve having a FWHM bandwidth and E95 bandwidth as shown. 
     FIGS. 6B and 7B  correspond to  FIG. 8B . In detail, with the 2 degrees rotation of the optic  200  shown in  FIG. 6B , a slight coma wavefront deformation is established in the laser beam. This deformation is shown in  FIG. 7B  and includes three wavefront regions: region  212   a  which may have little or no wavefront deformation, region  212   b  which may have a slightly tilted wavefront relative to undeformed region  212   a,  and region  212   c  which also may have a slightly tilted wavefront relative to undeformed region  212   a.  With the wavefront tilt shown in  FIG. 6B , regions  212   b  and  212   c  will illuminate the grating  42  (see  FIG. 2 ) at a slightly different angle of incidence than region  212   a.  It is to be appreciated that illuminating the grating at two angles of incidence will result in an output beam as shown in  FIG. 8B . Specifically, curve  214   a  corresponds to the undeformed region  212   a  after reflection from the grating and curve  214   b  corresponds to the undeformed regions  212   b ,  212   c  after reflection from the grating. The laser output bandwidth (curve  216 ), which is the summation of curves  214   a  and  214   b,  is also shown. 
     FIGS. 6C and 7C  correspond to  FIG. 8C . In detail, with the 3.5 degrees rotation of the optic  200  shown in  FIG. 6C , a substantial coma wavefront deformation is established in the laser beam. This deformation is shown in  FIG. 7C  and includes three wavefront regions: region  218   a  which may have little or no wavefront deformation, region  218   b  which may have a substantially tilted wavefront relative to undeformed region  218   a , and region  218   c  which also may have a substantially tilted wavefront relative to undeformed region  218   a.  With the wavefront tilt shown in  FIG. 6C , regions  218   b  and  218   c  will illuminate the grating  42  (see  FIG. 2 ) at a slightly different angle of incidence that region  218   a.  It is to be appreciated that illuminating the grating at two angles of incidence will result in an output beam as shown in  FIG. 8C . Specifically, curve  220   a  corresponds to the undeformed region  218   a  after reflection from the grating and curve  220   b  corresponds to the deformed regions  218   b ,  218   c  after reflection from the grating. The laser output bandwidth (curve  222 ), which is the summation of curves  220   a  and  220   b,  is also shown. Comparing  FIGS. 8A ,  8 B and  8 C, it can be seen that increasing coma increases FWHM, with little or no effect on E95. 
     FIGS. 9A-C  shows another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, in which an active bandwidth control system may include an optic  200 ′, positioned along a laser beam path. The optic  200 ′ may be configured to selectively alter a laser beam wavefront in the laser cavity, for example, to adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal, e.g., a control signal from the wavemeter  50  shown in  FIG. 2 . The optic  200 ′ may be used in place of the optic  200  shown in  FIG. 6A  to selectively produce the coma shown in  FIGS. 7A-7C  and the corresponding bandwidths shown in  FIGS. 8A-8C . 
   In more detail, the optic  200 ′ shown in  FIG. 9A  may include a positive cylindrical lens  202 ′ and a negative cylindrical lens  204 ′. For the optic  200 ′, the positive cylindrical lens  202 ′ and negative cylindrical lens  204 ′ may constitute an afocal pair that is positioned along a beam path, and, the afocal pair may be centered on a laser axis  206 ′ as shown in  FIG. 9A  to leave the wavefront of light passing through the optic  200  substantially unchanged. On the other hand, when one (or both) of the lenses  202 ′,  204 ′ is decentered (i.e., moved in a direction normal to the laser axis  206 ′) the wavefront of light passing through the optic  200 ′ will be altered. For example,  FIG. 9B  shows a decentration of lens  202 ′ by 2 mm which results in a slight wavelength deformation as shown in  FIG. 7B  resulting in a bandwidth shown in  FIG. 8B . Also,  FIG. 9C  shows a decentration of lens  202 ′ by 3 mm which results in a substantial wavelength deformation as shown in  FIG. 7C  resulting in a bandwidth shown in  FIG. 8C . Movement of one or more of the lenses  202 ′,  204 ′ in the optic  200 ′ can be accomplished using a suitable optical mount and actuator (not shown) which may include, for example, a motor and/or an actuable material, e.g., piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, etc. In one implementation, the decentration of lens  202 ′ is made in a direction parallel to the width of the fixed aperture  58  (see  FIG. 4 ). 
   While the particular aspects of embodiment(s) described and illustrated in this patent application in the detail required to satisfy 35 U.S.C. §112 is fully capable of attaining any above-described purposes for, problems to be solved by or any other reasons for or objects of the aspects of an embodiment(s) above described, it is to be understood by those skilled in the art that it is the presently described aspects of the described embodiment(s) of the present invention are merely exemplary, illustrative and representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention. The scope of the presently described and claimed aspects of embodiments fully encompasses other embodiments which may now be or may become obvious to those skilled in the art based on the teachings of the Specification. The scope of the present invention is solely and completely limited by only the appended claims and nothing beyond the recitations of the appended claims. Reference to an element in such claims in the singular is not intended to mean nor shall it mean in interpreting such claim element “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to any of the elements of the above-described aspects of an embodiment(s) that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Any term used in the specification and/or in the claims and expressly given a meaning in the Specification and/or claims in the present application shall have that meaning, regardless of any dictionary or other commonly used meaning for such a term. It is not intended or necessary for a device or method discussed in the Specification as any aspect of an embodiment to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the aspects of embodiments disclosed in this application, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. No element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element in the appended claims is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited as a “step” instead of an “act”. 
   It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the aspects of embodiments of the present invention disclosed above are intended to be preferred embodiments only and not to limit the disclosure of the present invention(s) in any way and particularly not to a specific preferred embodiment alone. Many changes and modification can be made to the disclosed aspects of embodiments of the disclosed invention(s) that will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art. The appended claims are intended in scope and meaning to cover not only the disclosed aspects of embodiments of the present invention(s) but also such equivalents and other modifications and changes that would be apparent to those skilled in the art.