Abstract:
A system creates and maintains an industry business architecture model over a network. The system defines specific levels of maturity for the model. Associations, relationships, and linkages between content elements are also determined. From these, a specific level of aggregate maturity is defined according to an algorithm.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
       [0001]    This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,120,643 issued Oct. 10, 2006 titled METHOD, SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR CREATING AND MAINTAINING AN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. ______ filed ______ entitled TOOL FOR CREATING AN INDUSTRY BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE MODEL, and U.S. application Ser. No. ______ filed ______ entitled SYSTEM FOR MANAGING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE USING INDUSTRY BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE MODELS which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    1. Field of the Invention 
         [0003]    The invention relates generally to enterprise architectures and particularly to maturity levels of an enterprise architecture model. More particularly the invention relates to assessing the maturity level of a business model. 
         [0004]    2. Description of the Related Art 
         [0005]    Dill, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,120,643 filed Nov. 19, 2002, describes an enterprise architecture having a process component, an organization component, a business component, and a technology component. Dill constructs a maturity model map showing the significance of each element of a component as compared to other elements in all of the components. The resulting patterns from constructing the maturity model map are used for various purposes relating to root causes of issues. 
       BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0006]    Various models of an enterprise such as component business models, process models, service models, and information models may be created at different levels of abstraction, or at different times, and having different types of content. An industry business architecture model (IBAM) has the logical models: component business model, process model, service model, and information model. In addition an IBAM also has a reference architecture, demos and other knowledge assets, and collateral. Collateral shall be taken herein to mean materials used to support marketing of consulting services. The IBAM may also have people with specific subject matter expertise associated with it. Because of this great disparity there is presently no known process which can be used to consistently review and assess the maturity of content in either an individual component business model, an individual process model, an individual service model, an individual information model, or in an industry business architecture model and its associated elements. Furthermore, there is presently no process known for assessing the aggregate maturity of an IBAM and its associated elements. 
         [0007]    The present invention addresses this need by defining specific levels of maturity. Associations, relationships, and linkages between content elements are also determined and from these, a specific level of aggregate maturity is defined according to an algorithm. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0008]      FIG. 1  is a network system for implementing an industry business architecture model and assessing its maturity; 
           [0009]      FIG. 2  is a flowchart for determining which models to assess maturity; 
           [0010]      FIG. 3  is a flowchart for selecting the scope of a maturity assessment; 
           [0011]      FIG. 4  is a flowchart for assessing maturity; and 
           [0012]      FIG. 5  is a framework for a maturity model. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0013]    In  FIG. 1  there is shown a network system upon which an IBAM is implemented and its maturity assessed. System  100  of  FIG. 1  includes a business enterprise  102  having server  104  and data storage device  118  having databases  120 - 128 . System  100  also has client systems  112  and  114  representing computer workstations, laptops, personal data assistants, cell phones, or any other client device known in the art. System  100  may also include a network connection to the Internet or any other network whether broadband or not, depicted by the cloud and lightning elements of  FIG. 1 . 
         [0014]    Client systems  112 ,  114  may be operated by representatives of business enterprise  102  including information technology (IT) professionals, architecture specialists, business professionals, management, and system administrators. The term “business enterprise” shall be taken herein to refer to the organization implementing the IBAM of the present invention. 
         [0015]    Network  116  connecting client systems  112 ,  114  to server  104  may comprise a LAN, WAN, wireless, infrared, radio, or any network configuration known in the art. Business enterprise  102  executes the IBAM via server  104 , client systems  112 ,  114  or a combination of these. 
         [0016]    Server  104  has data storage  118  attached either directly or via network  116 . Data storage has a plurality of databases  120 - 128  included therein. 
         [0017]    System  100  may also include wired or wireless connection to a wide area network including multiple geographical locations interconnected by high speed data lines or radio links as depicted by the lightning and cloud elements of  FIG. 1 . 
         [0018]    In an exemplary embodiment, the industry architecture model may be executing on server  104 , or clients  112 ,  114 , or on a combination of the above. 
         [0019]    In  FIG. 2  there is shown flowchart  20  for selecting the scope of a maturity assessment. The scope may be for an entire IBAM resulting in an aggregate maturity assessment by selecting path  21  to  FIG. 3 . The scope may be for the component business model, or the process model, or the service model, or the information model by selecting paths  22 ,  23 ,  24  or  25  respectively. The scope may also be any combination of models as indicated by decision block  26  in  FIG. 2 . 
         [0020]    After selecting the scope as described above, the appropriate paths are taken in the flowchart of  FIG. 3 . For each path an extensive checklist, which has been previously developed, is reviewed to insure completeness of the respective model. For each of the models separately, the maturity level is assessed. For example, the levels may be designated as defined, enhanced, or refined with defined as the lowest and refined as highest as shown in  FIG. 5 . Other level scales may be used. Finally in decision block  35  it is determined whether all model assessments are complete. If not, then the remaining paths of  FIG. 3  are followed as necessary. Note that all selections of scope from  FIG. 2  require step {circle around (E)} to be performed for a review of knowledge assets and collateral. 
         [0021]    In  FIG. 4  there is shown a flowchart  40  for assessing aggregate maturity level of an IBAM. Entering the flowchart at block  41 , the aggregate maturity level is assessed according to an algorithm. One example of such an algorithm is a rule that the aggregate maturity level is no higher than the lowest individual maturity level. In  FIG. 5 , if the lowest level of CBM maturity, or process maturity, or service maturity, or information maturity is level  2 , even though some may be level  1 , then the aggregate maturity level is set to level  2 . Other algorithms will be apparent to those skilled in the art of aggregate level setting, such as weighted average, maximum level, minimum level, and the like. 
         [0022]    In  FIG. 4  there is also shown step  42  for modeling governance of the IBAM as well as the CBM, process, service, and information model. Governance is described by Brown in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/024746 filed Feb. 2, 2008 and published as U.S. 2009/0198534 on Aug. 6, 2009 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. 
         [0023]    Following step  42 , the IBAM is updated in step  43  based on the aggregate maturity assessment of step  41 , thereby completing a closed loop path back to the IBAM itself. The algorithm for assessing aggregate maturity level may also be adjusted in step  43 . 
         [0024]    While there have been shown and described what are at present considered the preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modification may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.