Abstract:
The use of asphaltite blended with bituminous coals and lignites changes the agglomeration properties and quality of the resultant mixture to a degree and extent disproportionate to the blend.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention relates to an improved mixture or blend of solid carbonaceous materials, and particularly to a blend of asphaltite with bituminous coals or lignite. 
     2. Prior Art 
     There is a material available in nature, usually obtainable by mining, which is known as asphaltite. This material is not classified as coal, although it has been referred to as &#34;oil bearing coal.&#34; Asphaltite is instead solidified petroleum composed of 25-75% fixed carbon which resulted from the progressive loss of the volatile constituents contained in the bitumen. Grahamite which occurs in Pushmataha County, Okla., is a general type of asphaltite. It is characterized as having 30-55% fixed carbon; also, it is fusible and soluble in carbon disulfide. Solubility in carbon disulfide is the criterion that separates asphaltites from coals. Grahamite from the Pushmataha mines has been used for various purposes such as; manufacturing roofing, waterproofing compounds, candles, ointments, powders, beeswax, paints, varnishes, lining for chemicals tanks, roofing pitch, insulation for electric wires, garden hoses, binder for pitch in making coal briquettes, rubber substitutes, filler for brick and stone blocks, and molded insulation. The grahamite mined in Oklahoma and Arkansas is generally representative of similar low volatile coals such as albertite and impsonite found in Virginia, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. 
     At present however, asphaltite is not often used in coking processes because it burns too hot and burns out grates. This problem could be cured by utilizing water-cooled grates, but such equipment is expensive and is usually not installed merely to facilitate the burning of asphaltite. There are various other bituminous materials that have a certain heat content, but also have drawbacks that limit their use. For example, when North Dakota Lignite is ground up, the fines or dust below 28 mesh are removed. This material does not have a significant use unless the expensive process of pelletizing or agglomerating the fines is carried out. There are also eastern bituminous coals, for example, low volatile metallurgical coals, which are presently unsaleable because of their lack of volatile matter. 
     Lignite itself has a free swelling index (FSI) of 0, which means that it is substantially nonagglomerating and not useful at all for coke. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention contemplates blending asphaltite with lignite or bituminous coal to produce a composition which has better agglomerating characteristics and a higher heat content (BTU) than would be expected from a straight mixture. In other words, by mixing and blending asphaltite and lignite or bituminous coal the agglomerating characteristics and heat content of the resulting mixture are increased in a synergistic manner. That is, they are increased more than would be expected by a calculation of the percentages based on FSI or BTU of the individual constituents of the blend. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     In a preferred emodiment asphaltite (asphaltite) having an analysis as set forth below is blended with lignite: 
     
         ______________________________________  As Received Dry     Dry Ash-Free______________________________________Moisture 1.7Ash      3.04          3.09Volatile 41.89         42.61   43.97Fixed Carbon    53.37         54.30   56.03    100.00        100.00  100.00Sulfur   1.52          1.54BTU      15682         15953   16462FSI  9.0______________________________________ 
    
     The lignite incorporated in the blend has the following analysis: 
     
         ______________________________________            Residual Moisture 13.31              As               DryAir Dry Loss 34.44 Received Dry     Ash-free______________________________________PROXIMATE ANALYSISMoisture           43.16Ash                5.64     9.91Volative Matter    24.69    43.43   48.21Fixed Carbon       26.51    46.66   51.79              100.00   100.00  100.00ULTIMATE ANALYSISHydrogen           7.32     4.38    4.86Carbon             36.89    64.91   72.05Nitrogen           0.64     1.13    1.25Sulfur             0.45     0.79    0.88Oxygen             49.06    18.88   20.96Ash                5.64     9.91              100.00   100.00  100.00HEATING VALUE (BTU/LB)              6145     10811   12001FORMS OF SULFURSulfate sulfur     0.02     0.04    0.04Pyritic sulfur     0.09     0.15    0.17Organic sulfur     0.34     0.60    0.67FREE SWELLING INDEX 0.0ASH FUSION TEMPER-ATURES (Reducing Atmosphere)Initial Deformation              2270 F.Softening Temp.    2300 F.Fluid Temp.        2310 F.______________________________________ 
    
     The resulting blend samples of 50% lignite and 50% asphaltite is found to have the following analysis: 
     
         ______________________________________  As Received Dry     Dry Ash-Free______________________________________Moisture 1.0Ash      8.61          8.69Volatile 42.71         43.14   47.24Fixed Carbon    47.68         48.17   52.76    100.00        100.00  100.00Sulfur   1.40          1.42BTU      13209         13343   14613FSI 8.5______________________________________ 
    
     It can thus be seen that by taking lignite having a free-swelling index of 0 and blending it in 50-50 mixture with asphaltite having a FSI of 9, one would expect on a mathematical basis a resulting FSI of 4.5. However, as shown by the analysis, the FSI or agglomerating properties are significantly increased so that the blend may be used for coking. 
     Also, considering the heat value or BTU, it can be seen that the as received blend of lignite and asphaltite is 13,209, while the BTU per pound of the lignite alone is 6,145 and the BTU of the asphaltite alone is 15,682, which on a 50-50 blend basis would calculate to give a resultant BTU value of 10,913, whereas the test shows that the resulting BTU value is surprisingly and unexpectedly 13,209. 
     Other blends of lignite and asphaltite were made and analyzed with the results that a 40% blend of lignite and 60% of asphaltite yields an FSI of 9, while 20 and 40% asphaltite to 80 and 60% lignite yield FSIs of 3 and 5.5 which are below the acceptable minimum for coking coal. 
     It has also been found that the combination of 60% asphaltite with 40% Somerset low volatile metallurgical coal 
     
         ______________________________________  As Received Dry     Dry Ash-Free______________________________________Moisture 1.0Ash      5.13          5.18Volatile 32.66         32.99   34.80Fixed Carbon    61.21         61.83   65.20    100.00        100.00  100.00Sulfur   1.27          1.28BTU      15122         15275   16110FSI 9.0______________________________________ 
    
     This mixture increased the volatile content of the coals significantly so that it would be more saleable and also synergistically increased the heat content or BTU value more than would be expected from a strict mathematical calculation based on the BTU value of the two constituents of the blend. 
     The reason that the agglomerating characteristic and heat values of the blends are increased in such a synergistic manner is not known at present and at present Applicant cannot even speculate on the reason.