Abstract:
In the treatment of alcoholism, co-treatment with an active agent capable of offsetting unwanted adverse clinical manifestations to the treatment itself, for example, negative drug adverse clinical manifestations, greatly increases patient compliance. Increasing patient compliance, in turn, creates a better success rate and decreased recidivism or relapse. The current invention combines the use of an opioid antagonist with at least one anticonvulsant for the treatment of alcoholism.

Description:
RELATED APPLICATION  
       [0001]     This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/554,658, filed on Mar. 19, 2004, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]     Alcohol dependence is a chronic disorder that results from a variety of genetic, psychological and environmental factors. Treatment has consisted of two phases: detoxification and rehabilitation. Detoxification ameliorates the symptoms and signs of withdrawal; rehabilitation helps the patient avoid future problems with alcohol. In the past, most rehabilitative treatments have been psychosocial. With advances in neurobiology, there is increasing interest in drug therapy for alcohol dependence. For a discussion of the development of this field, see Swift, R., Drug Therapy for Alcohol Dependence, NEJM, May 13, 1999, 1482-1490. Yet, the successful treatment of alcoholism has many serious challenges and complications. For example, alcohol abuse followed by withdrawal is one of the most common causes of seizures in adults. The seizures are serious medical conditions which require more intensive treatment, usually under emergency conditions. Thus, anticonvulsants have been used when a patient is presenting with acute symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. Anticonvulsants have also been used to treat some symptoms associated with the protracted or persistent abstinence syndrome (PAS) when patients present with impulsivity, hostility and irritability. Two anticonvulsants, valproic acid and Gabapentin have been shown to be safe and efficacious alternatives to benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Myrick, Hugh et al,  Gabapentin Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal , Am J Psychiatry 155(11): 1626, November 1998; Karam-Hage, Maher et al,  Gabapentin Treatment for Insomnia Associated with Alcohol Dependence , Am J Psychiatry 157:1, January 2000, Minuk, g.Y., et al,  The use of sodium valproate in the treatment of alcoholism , J Addict Dis. 14(2):67-74 1995.  
         [0003]     Others have attempted treating alcoholism following a period of abstinence by the patient, for example, by administering opioid antagonists. Opioid antagonists act by blocking the reinforcing effect of alcohol which gives rise to craving. For the treatment of alcoholism, opioid antagonists act by blocking the positive effects of alcohol which results from the release of endogenous opioids upon the consumption of alcohol. However, during the period of abstinence, symptoms of withdrawal may appear.  
         [0004]     Thus, a treatment is needed to counteract the different negative aspects associated with treatment of alcohol dependence, in this case, withdrawal symptoms and craving. The occurrence of either of these symptoms is difficult but the combination of these two negative aspects often present insurmountable challenges to patients, even highly motivated patients. Therefore, a need exists for treatment of alcoholism tailored to decrease alcohol dependence, minimize withdrawal symptoms, especially PAS, and inhibit cravings.  
         [0005]     Still further, often the treatment itself is perceived by the patient as “worse than the cure.” For example, once the initial detoxification begins and the patient decreases or ceases alcohol intake as per the treatment regime, the patient will often view the adverse clinical manifestations of the medication itself as unpleasant and unwanted. Then, the patient will stop taking the drug. The lack of patient compliance with the entire treatment regime is an enormous problem and accounts for a high rate of incomplete treatment and relapse. Accordingly, there is a need for counteracting the negative aspects of the drug treatment itself so as to increase compliance with the treatment regime.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0006]     The invention is based upon the discovery that a continuity of treatment and anticipation of the timing, severity and combination of withdrawal symptoms and cravings is key to successful treatment of alcohol dependence. The invention is also based upon the discovery that co-treatment with an active agent capable of offsetting unwanted adverse clinical manifestations to the treatment itself, for example, negative drug side effects, greatly increases patient compliance. Increasing patient compliance, in turn, creates a better success rate and decreased recidivism or relapse. The current invention is a method for treating alcoholism comprising administering to a patient a therapeutically effective amount of a combination of (i) at least one opioid antagonist; and (ii) at least one anticonvulsant in the treatment of alcoholism, including the treatment of alcohol dependence, withdrawal symptoms, PAS and cravings. The combination also reduces the neuronal excitability associated with withdrawal.  
         [0007]     In another aspect the invention reduces the negative adverse clinical manifestations of the at least one opioid antagonist.  
         [0008]     In another aspect, the invention improves patient compliance when treating the patient for alcoholism.  
         [0009]     In one aspect, the factor of non-compliance is greatly reduced, preferably removed, as a contributing factor to the failure rate of treatment for alcoholism.  
         [0010]     In yet another aspect, the at least one opioid antagonist is selected from the group consisting of naltrexone, naloxone and nalmefene.  
         [0011]     In still another aspect, the at least one opioid antagonist is in a form selected from the group consisting of a polymorph, solvate, hydrate, dehydrate, co-crystal, anhydrous form and amorphous form or combinations thereof.  
         [0012]     In a further aspect, the at least one anticonvulsant is selected from the group consisting of carbamezepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, diphenylhydantoin, phenyloin, mephenyloin, ethotoin, mephobarbital, primidone, ethosuximide, methsuximinde, phensuximide, trimethadione, phenacemide, acetazolamide, progabide, clonazepam, divalproex sodium, magnesium sulfate injection, metharbital, paramethadione, phenyloin sodium, clobazam, sulthiame, dilantin, zolpidem tartrate, zaleplon, indiplon, and zopiclone.  
         [0013]     In yet a further aspect, the invention is a kit comprising at least one treatment dose of therapeutically effective amount of: 
        (i) at least one opioid antagonist; and     (ii) at least one anticonvulsant 
 
 wherein the antagonist of (i) and the anticonvulsant of (ii) comprise a single pharmaceutical composition. 
       
 
         [0016]     In still another aspect, the invention is a kit comprising at least one treatment dose of therapeutically effective amount of: 
        (i) at least one opioid antagonist; and     (ii) at least one anticonvulsant 
 
 wherein the antagonist of (i) and the anticonvulsant of (ii) comprise more than one pharmaceutical composition. 
       
 
         [0019]     The invention further relates to a method for treating alcoholism by administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising (i) at least one opioid antagonist; and (ii) at least one anticonvulsant, for a time period (a) beginning with discontinuation or reduction of alcohol intake throughout complete withdrawal, (b) beginning with discontinuation or reduction of alcohol intake until the symptoms of PAS abate, (c) during a drinking reduction program and/or (d) before (in anticipation of) or concurrently with life events that would increase the risk of relapse. In one embodiment, situational treatment is begun before treatment or resumed after treatment has ceased.  
         [0020]     In another embodiment, the invention relates to methods of administering by oral, transdermal, transnasal, or depot dosage units an opioid antagonist including but not limited to the naltrexone, nalmefene, and naloxone and their pharmacologically effective salts and esters, or combinations thereof in combination with an anticonvulsant, including but not limited to carbamezepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. In preferred embodiments, the opioid antagonists include but are limited to polymorphs, solvates, hydrates, dehydrates, co-crystals, anhydrous and amorphous forms of naltrexone, nalmefene, or naloxone. 
     
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0021]      FIG. 1A  is a graph showing naltrexone dose response in a rodent model of alcohol self-administration. Naltrexone (0-6.0 mg/kg, SC) was administered to trained rat to measure its effect on ethanol drinking using an operant self-administration procedure. A dose-dependent decrease in the number of lever presses is observed with an ED 50  of 0.1-0.5 mg/kg.  
         [0022]      FIG. 1B  is a bar graph showing that amount of ethanol (ETOH) consumed at various doses of naltrexone. Based on the number of lever press responses following a dose of naltrexone ( FIG. 1A ), the corresponding amount of absolute ethanol consumed (g/kg) was calculated. To calculate the amount of absolute ethanol consumed, divide the number of lever presses by 2 to obtain the number of earned reinforcements. From this number, the total volume of the alcohol “cocktail” (10% EtOH in 0.04% saccharine solution) consumed was obtained. The grams of absolute EtOH consumed=the total “cocktail” volume consumed X 10% EtOH X 0.793 g EtOH/mL. The amount of ethanol (g) divided by the animal&#39;s weight (kg) gives the amount of absolute ethanol consumed in g/kg.  
         [0023]      FIG. 2  is a bar graph showing naltrexone-induced (0.5 mg/kg, sc) decrease in drinking is specific for ethanol since these animals will lever press for saccharine (following naltrexone (NTX)) to the same degree as under the non-drug baseline condition with the EtOH cocktail.  
         [0024]      FIG. 3A  is a bar graph showing increasing dosages gabapentin in combination with naltrexone versus alcohol consumption as indicated by the number of lever presses.  
         [0025]      FIG. 3B  is a graph showing a range of naltrexone dosages (0.05-3.0 mg/kg) coadministered with gabapentin (1 mg/kg) versus alcohol consumption as indicated by the number of lever presses.  
         [0026]      FIG. 3C  is a line graph showing the amount of naltrexone in the plasma over a period of time for naltrexone administered alone or naltrexone coadministered with gabapentin. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0027]     As stated in Swift, R. supra at 1488, 
        Although therapy with two or more drugs with different mechanisms of action, given together or in sequence, may yield additive or synergistic benefits in patients with alcohol dependence, there is no evidence that multiple-drug therapy improves the effectiveness of treatment. 
 
 Applicant has analyzed various drug combinations and has identified combinations of drugs which are particularly suitable for the treatment of alcoholism, including abatement of adverse clinical manifestations of treatment which affect patient compliance and hence, the overall success of treatment. The method of the administering combinations of selected drugs enables full spectrum treatment from detoxification through rehabilitation. A particular advantage of the invention is that it provides a method of continual support for the recovering alcoholic beyond rehabilitation. The patient has the psychological advantage of having alternatives in times of weakness beyond classical treatment when active support is discontinued, for example, discontinuation of individual or group therapy, residential treatment in alcohol-free settings and self-help groups. That is, the combination treatment of the invention can be continued or renewed as medically indicated before (in anticipation of) or concurrently with life events that would increase the risk of relapse. 
       
 
         [0029]     When assessing success of drug treatments, typical outcomes include, but are not limited to, increases in abstinence, expressed as the proportion of patients remaining abstinent or the length of time to the loss of abstinence (relapse), and reductions in the quantity or frequency of drinking, expressed as the number of drinking days and the number of drinks per drinking day. Although abstinence is the more stringent outcome and is preferred, reductions in consumption can nevertheless reduce alcohol-related morbidity. Further, retention of the patient in the treatment regime is an important indicator of success. A high drop-out rate of patients on naltrexone alone compared to those with the combination therapy of the invention can be easily determined.  
         [0030]     In one embodiment, the current invention combines the use of an anticonvulsant with an opioid antagonist for the treatment of alcoholism. Unless otherwise indicated, as used herein the treatment of alcoholism includes the treatment of alcohol dependence, withdrawal symptoms, PAS and cravings.  
         [0031]     As used herein “treatment” of alcoholism includes the treatment of initial and ongoing symptoms of alcoholism, prophylactic treatment of patients susceptible to relapse of alcoholism, treatment of patients who have relapsed into alcoholism. As used herein a “susceptible” patient is a patient that has the potential of having a relapse of disease for any reason including times of weakness beyond classical treatment when active support is discontinued, for example, discontinuation of individual or group therapy, residential treatment in alcohol-free settings and self-help groups or any other life events that would increase the risk of relapse.  
         [0032]     As used herein the term “inhibiting the undesirable adverse clinical manifestations of alcoholism” refers to preventing, partially or totally, symptoms often associated with treatment for alcoholism including but not limited to (generally in order of increasing severity): feelings of jumpiness or nervousness; feeling of shakiness; anxiety; irritability or being easily excited; difficulty in thinking clearly; bad dreams; emotional volatility; rapid emotional changes; depression; fatigue; headache (generally pulsating); sweating (especially palms of the hands or the face); nausea; vomiting; loss of appetite; insomnia or sleeping difficulty; paleness; rapid heart rate (palpitations); eyes, especially pupils, different size (enlarged, dilated pupils); clammy skin; abnormal movements including tremor of the hands or involuntary, abnormal movements of the eyelids; state of confusion and hallucinations (also called delirium tremens); agitation; fever; convulsions; “black outs”. (Source: National Institutes of Health)  
         [0033]     By combining the actions of two or more drugs of the invention, an alcoholic patient&#39;s symptoms and cravings will be treated at the same time. In one embodiment, two different types of drugs, a patient&#39;s symptoms and cravings will be treated at the same time. The two different types of drugs reduce neuronal hyperexcitability associated with withdrawal or PAS while, at the same time, blocking the craving for or the positive reinforcing effects of alcohol. The drug combination would also likely help reinforce the efficacy of each drug in a number of ways. In reducing withdrawal symptoms, anticonvulsants help reduce the craving for alcohol that accompanies withdrawal. Since insomnia is a common symptom of alcohol-dependent patients, the sleep inducing properties of anticonvulsants are also beneficial to patients. This further reduces withdrawal symptoms and further reinforces the actions of the opioid antagonist. The drug combination would significantly reduce the likelihood of relapse as well as help increase compliance and successful treatment outcomes. All treatments are not successful. However, by removing “non-compliance” with the treatment regime as a factor, reasons for failure of treatment come into better focus and allow interventions which are more tailored to the patient.  
         [0034]     Combined treatment of an anticonvulsant and the opioid antagonist would continue through and until withdrawal and/or PAS symptoms abated. Also, combined treatment would continue throughout an abstinence or drinking reduction program or be administered in anticipation of, or concurrently with, life events that would increase the risk of relapse. Initial combined treatment of the anticonvulsant and the opioid antagonist would continue from a period of from one month to about six months. Suitable doses of anticonvulsants are at low enough doses to lower or reduce the undesirable adverse clinical manifestations while still eliciting the reinforcing or positive effect with the opioid antagonist. The preferred time of day for administering the dose would be the evening or before bedtime.  
         [0035]     Opioid antagonists suitable for use in the invention include naltrexone, naloxone and nalmefene. As used herein naltrexone, naloxone, nalmefene include but are limited to polymorphs, solvates, hydrates, dehydrates, co-crystals, anhydrous and amorphous forms of naltrexone, naloxone or nalmefene.  
         [0036]     In one embodiment the naltrexone is naltrexone hydrochloride (HCl) which is available generically and under the trade name ReVia or Depade. Naltrexone is currently available in oral tablet from and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of alcoholism as well as heroin and opium addiction. While not being held to one particular theory, it is believe that opioid antagonists act by blocking the positive reinforcing effect of alcohol, which results from the release of endogenous opioids upon the consumption of alcohol. In general, opioid antagonists are used in the treatment of alcoholism following a period of abstinence by the patient, which may include symptoms of withdrawal. Most patients take naltrexone for 12 weeks or more. In general, the treatment involves taking a prescribed course of naltrexone tablets for up to one year. These tablets are taken by mouth, once a day or, every couple of days at a higher dose. Generally, the doctor may initially monitor the patient&#39;s progress quite closely. Naltrexone&#39;s effect on blocking opioids occurs shortly after taking the first dose. Findings to date suggest that the effects of naltrexone in helping patients remain abstinent and avoid relapse to alcohol use also occur early.  
         [0037]     Naltrexone is dispensed by retail or mail-order pharmacies. Taking naltrexone tablets is only part of the treatment. As in many other conditions, the treatment can be more effective when combined with counseling and ongoing support from friends and family. It appears that patients who do have the involvement of a caregiver are more likely to complete the naltrexone treatment. For this reason doctors may encourage the patient to seek out people they can rely on for support and care during the treatment. This could include a family member, a partner, friend or a health practitioner such as nurse or pharmacist. One of the key roles for the caregiver is to supervise the naltrexone dosage as prescribed by the doctor. Even with the support of the caregiver, the treatment can be jeopardized by a potential for conflict which may arise as some patient may come to resent being supervised. Further, some patients do not have access to a caregiver. These patients are especially at risk for unsuccessful treatment.  
         [0038]     It is know that some patients have adverse clinical manifestations like nausea, headache, constipation, dizziness, nervousness, insomnia, drowsiness, anxiety and other symptoms disclosed above. Naltrexone adverse clinical manifestations, predominantly nausea, have been severe enough to discontinue the medication in 5-10% of the patients prescribed it as a treatment for alcoholism. If a patient gets any of these adverse clinical manifestations and consults the doctor, the doctor may be forced to change the treatment or suggest other ways to deal with the adverse clinical manifestations. Often instead of seeing a doctor, the patient will “self-treat” by skipping doses or stopping the doses altogether.  
         [0000]     Combination of Oipioid Antagonists and Anticonvulsants  
         [0039]     Anticonvulsants suitable for use in the invention include, but are not limited to, carbamezepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, gabapentin, levetiracetam and topiramate. Other suitable drugs with anticonvulsant properties or activity including phenobarbital, diphenylhydantoin, phenyloin, mephenyloin, ethotoin, mephobarbital, primidone, ethosuximide, methsuximinde, phensuximide, trimethadione, phenacemide, acetazolamide, progabide, clonazepam, divalproex sodium, magnesium sulfate injection, metharbital, paramethadione, phenyloin sodium, clobazam, sulthiame, dilantin, zolpidem tartrate, zaleplon, indiplon, zopiclone, diphenylan.  
         [0040]     In calculating the dosages suitable for use in the instant invention, it is instructive to consider known guidelines, while keeping in mind the personality of the patient, symptoms and needs of the patient.  
         [0041]     Carbamezepine, 5H-dibenz [b,f] azepine-5-carboxamide is an anticonvulsant and analgesic marketed for trigeminal neuralgia; U.S. Pat. No. 2,948,718 discloses carbamezepine and methods of use. Carbamezepine is commercially available as Atretol®, Depitol®, Epitol® or Tegretol®. Suitable doses for use in the methods of the present invention range are from about 200 to 1200 mg/day. Other suitable dosage ranges are between about 300 and 500 mg/day; or about 350 and 550 mg/day; or about 400 to about 600 mg/day.  
         [0042]     Valproic Acid, 2-propylpentanoic acid or dispropylacetic acid is a well known antiepileptic agent that increases central GABAergic activity; Various pharmaceutically acceptable salts are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,699,927. Doses of valproic acid: from about 250 to 2500 mg/day; preferably 1000 mg/day. Sodium valproate is commercially available as Depacon® while valproic acid is available as Depakene®.  
         [0043]     Lamotrigine, 6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,4-trizine-3,5-diamine is an antiepileptic drug indicated as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial seizures in adults with epilepsy. Lamotrigine and its uses are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,354. Doses of lamotrigine: from about 50 to 600 mg/day in 1 to 2 doses; preferably 200 to 400 mg; most preferably 200 mg. Lamotrigine is commercially available as Lamictal®.  
         [0044]     Gabapentin, 1-(aminomethyl)cyclohexane acetic acid, is an anticonvulsant indicated as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial seizures with and without secondary generalization in adults with epilepsy. Gabapentin and its methods of use is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,024,175 and 4,087,544. Doses of gabapentin: from about 300 to 3600 mg/day in 2 to 3 divided doses; preferably 300 to 1800 mg/day; most preferably 900 mg/day. Gabapentin is commercially available as Neurontin®.  
         [0045]     Topiramate, 2,3:4,5-di-O-(1-isopropylidine)- 3 -D-fructopyranose sulphamate is an antiepileptic indicated for the treatment of refractory partial seizures, with or without secondary generalization and disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,513,006. Doses of Topiramate: from about 200 to 600 mg/day divided in 2 doses; most preferably 400 mg/day. Topiramate is commercially available as Topomax®.  
         [0046]     Levetiracetam, a single enantiomer, is (−)-(S)-α-ethyl-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine acetamide. It is an anti-epileptic indicated for partial seizures in adults. Examples of processes for preparing Levetiracetam are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,492. Levetiracetam and methods of use are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,696,943. Levetiracetam is commercially available as Keppra® in tablets ranging from 250-750 mg, preferably taken twice a day.  
       EXEMPLIFICATION  
     Example 1  
       [0047]     The objective of this study was to determine whether naltrexone&#39;s ability to decrease alcohol consumption is affected when combined with an anticonvulsant. The model used for this study was a rat model of alcohol self-administration.  
         [0000]     Methods:  
         [0000]     Animals  
         [0048]     Male Wistar rats (starting weight of 200±30 grams; Charles River Laboratories, MA) were individually housed with free access to food and water. The vivarium was maintained within the temperature and relative humidity range specified within the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised 1985). These conditions were recorded once daily throughout the study. The vivarium was on a 12 hour light/dark schedule. All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Alkermes&#39; IACUC (protocol #04-2A).  
         [0000]     Ethanol Self Administration Training Procedure  
         [0049]     Animals were trained daily in an operant chamber to press a lever to receive access to an ethanol cocktail as a reinforcer using a saccharin fading procedure. This procedure began with a highly sweetened saccharin solution (0.1%) and increasing amounts of ethanol were gradually introduced over a period of 2-3 weeks while the sweetness was continually reduced. The final ethanol cocktail contained 10% ethanol in 0.04% saccharine. Each session lasted 30 minutes, during which the rat could press the lever twice to gain access to 0.1 mL of the ethanol cocktail. The operant chamber (Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, Pa.) is a computer-controlled automated system which recorded the number of lever presses completed by a rat. At the end of the training period (6-8 weeks), rats which consistently drank a sufficient quantity of ethanol to produce a pharmacological effect (minimum intake of 0.6 g/kg/hour) were selected to participate in the drug studies. These trained rats were used repeatedly throughout these studies to control for intra-subject variability. All drugs were administered acutely with a minimum of a 2 day drug washout period.  
         [0000]     Drug Preparation  
         [0050]     Naltrexone was prepared daily in 0.9% saline and administered subcutaneously (SC). The anticonvulsants (gabapentin, carbamazepine, levetiracetam and lamotrigine) were suspended in 3% carboxymethyl cellulose; a total volume of 1 mL/kg of this suspension was delivered orally (PO) to the rat using a gavage tube. See Table 1 for source and lot numbers of the drugs tested.  
                                 TABLE 1                           Drug Information                DRUG   SOURCE   LOT NUMBER                       Naltrexone   Sigma, Inc.   103K1495           Gabapentin   Plantex USA, Inc.   288002903           Levetiracetam   Plantex USA, Inc.   11191-8           Lamotrigine   Plantex USA, Inc.   950200102           Carbamazepine   Plantex USA, Inc.   286400203                      
 
 Effect of Naltrexone on Ethanol Drinking 
 
         [0051]     The ability of naltrexone to reduce ethanol drinking (i.e., decrease the number of lever presses) was assessed in this animal model of self administration of ethanol. Thirty minutes after the administration of naltrexone (0-6 mg/kg, SC), the animals were placed in the operant chamber and allowed to lever press for the 10% ethanol cocktail. The total number of lever presses was recorded over the 30 minute test session. The rats were repeatedly dosed with naltrexone to generate a dose-response curve for each individual animal. To determine if naltrexone specifically decreased ethanol drinking (as opposed to drinking in general), a 0.1% saccharine solution was substituted for the ethanol cocktail.  
         [0000]     Effect of the Co-Administration of Anticonvulsants with Naltrexone on Ethanol Drinking  
         [0052]     An anticonvulsant (gabapentin, carbamazepine, levetiracetam or lamotrigine) was coadministered with naltrexone to determine if it affected naltrexone&#39;s ability to decrease ethanol drinking. The dose of naltrexone used in this series of studies was the ED 50  (that is, the dose of naltrexone that produced a 50% decrease in lever responses for ethanol as determined from the dose-response study). This dose allows one to determine if the co-administered drugs impaired or enhanced naltrexone&#39;s effect on ethanol drinking. The anticonvulsants were administered orally 30 minutes prior to a naltrexone injection (SC) (i.e., 60 minutes prior to the beginning of the ethanol drinking test session). The number of lever presses for the ethanol cocktail was recorded at the end of the 30 minute session.  
         [0000]     Results:  
         [0000]     Effect of Naltrexone on Ethanol Drinking  
         [0053]     Efficacy of naltrexone was confirmed in the behavioral model of ethanol self administration, as indicated by a dose-dependent decrease in the number of lever presses by treated rats (Table 2,  FIG. 1A ). In contrast, there was no significant decrease between the baseline (no drug treatment), vehicle control (saline) and the lowest dose of naltrexone tested (0.05 mg/kg). At the higher doses (3 and 6 mg/kg), the effect of naltrexone on decreasing ethanol drinking appeared to plateau (bottom out). The naltrexone ED 50  was determined to be 0.5 mg/kg, which was defined as the dose at which responding to the lever for ethanol was reduced by approximately 50% compared to baseline values. Similarly, the amount of ethanol consumed (g/kg) following naltrexone administration also confirms the ED 50  dose of 0.5 mg/kg as being 50% less than the baseline ( FIG. 1B ). Additionally, naltrexone was shown at this dose to be selective for decreasing ethanol drinking in rats (but not saccharine drinking) ( FIG. 2 ).  
                                     TABLE 2                           Naltrexone Dose-Response                            Approximate Absolute           Dose       Lever Presses   Ethanol Consumed       Treatment   (mg/kg)   N   (Mean ± SEM)   (g/kg)               No Drug   —   9   138 ± 10.6   1.1       (Baseline)       Naltrexone   Vehicle   7    187 ± 22.75   1.5           0.05   9   132 ± 13.3   1.0           0.1   9   88 ± 8.6   0.7           0.5   8    83 ± 12.1   0.6           1.0   7   43 ± 8.6   0.3           3.0   6   24 ± 8.1   0.2           6.0   6   21 ± 5.5   0.2                  
 
 Effect of the Coadministration of Anticonvulsants with Naltrexone on Ethanol Drinking 
 
         [0054]     This phase of the study investigated the effect of potential drug interactions between naltrexone and anticonvulsants on the number of lever presses by rats for ethanol compared to naltrexone alone. A significantly higher number of lever responses would demonstrate that the drug interaction impaired naltrexone&#39;s ability to decrease ethanol drinking. In contrast, significantly lower responses would suggest a synergistic or additive effect of the drug combination (Table 3).  
                                                   TABLE 3                           Drug Interaction Studies                    ED 50             TREATMENT   DRUG DOSE   NALTREXONE           (TRADE NAME)   (PO, MG/KG)   (SC, MG/KG)   N                    GABAPENTIN   0.0   0.5   16       (Neurontin ®)   0.1       9           1.0       16           10.0       9       LEVETIRACETAM   0.0   0.5   15       (Keppra ®)   1.0       5           10.0       13           100.0       13       LAMOTRIGINE   0.0   0.1   7       (Lamictal ®)   0.1       7           1.0       7           10.0       7       CARBAMAZEPINE   0.0   0.1   8       (Tegretol ®)   0.1       6           1.0       8           10.0       8                  
 
 Gabapentin 
 
         [0055]     Gabapentin&#39;s mechanism as an anticonvulsant remains unclear. Current research suggests gabapentin is a GABA modulator and also binds specifically to sodium and calcium ion channels. A range of doses of gabapen tin (0.1-110 mg/kg) were administered together with a moderate dose (ED 50 ) of naltrexone to examine the potential drug interaction on ethanol drinking. Naltrexone decreased the number of lever presses for ethanol by 54% compared to non-drug treated (baseline) conditions. A further significant decrease in ethanol drinking was observed with gabapentin (1 mg/kg) plus naltrexone (0.5 mg/kg) compared to naltrexone alone (p&lt;0.006). This potentiation in ethanol drinking was not seen when the higher or lower dose of gabapentin (0.1 and 10.0 mg/kg) was coadministered with naltrexone. Further, neither gabapentin at 1 or 10 mg/kg alone had any effect on lever pressing for ethanol in this model compared to non-drug treated conditions ( FIG. 3A ).  
         [0056]     To determine if this drug interaction might be effective in decreasing ethanol drinking with lower doses of naltrexone, the dose of gabapentin (1 mg/kg) was kept constant and the dose of naltrexone varied from 0.05 to 3.0 mg/kg ( FIG. 3B ). As seen with the initial naltrexone dose-response study, increasing doses of naltrexone resulted in a greater decrease in the number of lever presses for ethanol. No differences in the number of lever presses were observed between naltrexone alone and when combined with gabapentin, except again at the 0.5 mg/kg naltrexone dose. To determine if gabapentin may be altering the plasma profile of naltrexone at this dose combination, a pharmacokinetic study was run in a separate cohort group of rats. There was no statistical difference between the two treatment groups (vehicle+naltrexone vs gabapentin+naltrexone)( FIG. 3C ).  
         [0000]     Levetiracetam  
         [0057]     The second anticonvulsant coadministered with naltrexone was levetiracetam (Keppra) (1-100 mg/kg, PO) (Table 4). Little is known of the neurochemical mechanism of action for levetiracetem, a derivative of the nootropic piracetam. While naltrexone (0.5 mg/kg, SC) decreased lever responding for ethanol by 65% (compared to non-drug baseline), no significant differences were observed between naltrexone (with vehicle) and the combinations of levetiracetam with naltrexone (Table 4). Thus, no pharmacological interaction between the two drugs was observed at the doses tested.  
         [0058]     Additional testing with naltrexone alone demonstrated a consistent shift in the ED 50  dose (0.5 mg/kg) for most of the animals. That is, this dose was producing a greater than 50% reduction in lever pressing for ethanol. A narrow dose-response test was conducted and the ED 50  was re-established at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg.  
         [0000]     Lamotrigine  
         [0059]     The next anticonvulsant coadministered with naltrexone was lamotrigine (Lamictal) at a dose range of 0.1-10 mg/kg (PO). Through its effect on sodium channels and glutamate receptors, lamotrigine inhibits cellular depolarization. In this study, naltrexone alone decreased lever responding for ethanol by 49% (compared to non-drug baseline). Combining this dose of naltrexone with lamotrigine did not significantly affect the number of lever presses for ethanol (Table 4). Thus, there was no evidence of a pharmacological interaction of lamotrigine with naltrexone as measured by the self-administration of ethanol.  
         [0000]     Carbamazepine  
         [0060]     The last anticonvulsant tested carbamazepine (Tegretol), acts by antagonizing sodium channels. A carbamazepine dose range of 0.1-10.0 mg/kg (PO) was tested with naltrexone. While naltrexone (0.1 mg/kg) decreased the number of lever presses by 42.4% (from the baseline), the combination of carbamazepine and naltrexone did not significantly affect ethanol drinking (Table 4). Based on this data, there is no measurable interaction between naltrexone and carbamazepine.  
                                                           TABLE 4                           Coadministration of Anticonvulsants Does Not Affect       Naltrexone&#39;s Ability to Decrease Alcohol Drinking                    ED 50         Number of           Drug Dose   Naltrexone       Lever Presses       Treatment   (PO, mg/kg)   (SC, mg/kg)   N   (mean ± sem)                    LEVETIRACETAM   —   Non-Drug   15   139 ± 10                Baseline               0.0   0.5   15     50 ± 10             1.0       5   34 ± 11           10.0       13   36 ± 8            100.0       13   34 ± 9        LAMOTRIGINE   —   Non-Drug   7   145 ± 16                Baseline               0.0   0.1   7     74 ± 18             0.1       7   61 ± 13           1.0       7   60 ± 13           10.0       7   567 ± 10        CARBAMAZEPINE   —   Non-Drug   8   117 ± 16                Baseline               0.0   0.1   8     67 ± 17             0.1       6   68 ± 10           1.0       8   49 ± 8            10.0       8   48 ± 9                   
 
 Compared to vehicle+naltrexone treatment (bolded values), coadministration of these anticonvulsants does not affect (i.e., neither impairs nor enhances) naltrexone&#39;s ability to suppress the self administration of EtOH in rats. 
 
 Conclusion: 
 
         [0061]     When coadministered with naltrexone, the anticonvulsants gabapentin, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam did not impair or block naltrexone&#39;s ability to decrease drinking in a rat model of alcohol self-administration. These data support the use of the coadministration of anticonvulsants with opioid antagonists for the treatment of alcohol dependency and symptoms associated with alcohol withdrawal. Further, the coadministration of gabapentin enhanced naltrexone&#39;s effects of alcohol drinking, albeit at a narrow therapeutic window.  
       Example 2  
       [0062]     An anticonvulsant, carbamazepine, was studied in a mouse model of alcohol withdrawal. Possible interactions with carbamazepine&#39;s ability to reduce convulsions when combined with naltrexone were also studied.  
         [0000]     Methods:  
         [0000]     Animals  
         [0063]     Male C57BL/6 mice (15-18 grams; Charles River Laboratories, MA) were housed in groups of 4 on a ventilated rack with free access to food and water. The vivarium was maintained within the temperature and relative humidity range specified within the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised 1985). These conditions were recorded once daily throughout the study. The vivarium was on a 12 hour light/dark schedule. All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Alkermes&#39; IACUC (protocol #04-8A).  
         [0000]     Alcohol Administration for the Induction of Alcohol Withdrawal Symptoms  
         [0064]     Persistent high alcohol levels in blood and brain are required to develop withdrawal symptoms following termination of alcohol availability. Because rodents do not consistently consume large amounts of alcohol voluntarily, one approach that has been used is “forced” choice administration. Alcohol is provided in a nutritionally balanced liquid diet. This diet becomes the animal&#39;s sole source of food and water. While the experimenter controls the duration of the alcohol exposure, the animal determines the dose and pattern of consumption.  
         [0065]     After a 3-5 day acclimation period, the mice were individually identified (tail mark with permanent marker) and weighed. The normal rodent chow and water was replaced with a nutritionally complete control liquid diet (Bio-Serv, Lieber-DeCarli diet) for a 5-7 day habituation period. Acquisition of EtOH drinking in mice involved a gradually escalating ethanol concentration procedure. Ethanol treated animals received an EtOH liquid diet containing 1.5% EtOH for 5-7 days. The EtOH concentration was increased every 5-7 days to a final concentration of 6.7%. The liquid diet was administered in a screw capped graduated 100 mL liquid feeding tube mounted inside the cage. The volume of remaining diet was measured and the diet changed daily. The mice were observed daily and weighed every week to assure adequate EtOH diet intake.  
         [0066]     Development of alcohol withdrawal symptoms requires a cycle of alcohol/no alcohol. The animals were given a period of 14 days of the EtOH diet (6.7%), 2 days of control diet (balanced isocalorically with maltose dextrin replacing the EtOH) and 5-6 days of the EtOH diet.  
         [0000]     Audiogenic-Induced Convulsions  
         [0067]     One of the hallmark symptoms of alcohol withdrawal in mice is the occurrence of convulsions. These can occur spontaneously, from handling the animal, from a sudden loud sound (audiogenic) or from subthreshold doses of chemical convulsants. For this series of studies, the occurrence of audiogenic-induced convulsions was used as a measure of alcohol withdrawal. To test for audiogenic-induced convulsions, each group (cage) of mice was placed in a clear 5 gallon polystyrene bucket with a thin layer of corn cob bedding on its floor. After a 3 minute acclimation period (quiet period), a 78 db electric bell, located 3 feet above the bucket, was activated for 30 seconds and the animals&#39; behavior was observed. A 4-point scale of the behavioral response was developed and used, where 1=freezing response, 2=hyper-reactive response involving jumping and running, 3=tonic-clonic convulsions with survival, and 4=tonic-clonic convulsions followed by death.  
         [0000]     Drug Preparation  
         [0068]     Naltrexone (Sigma, Inc., Lot # 103K1495) was prepared daily for a dose of 3 mg/kg in 0.9% saline and administered intraperitioneally (IP). The anticonvulsant carbamazepine (Plantex USA, Inc., Lot# 286400203) was suspended in 3% carboxymethyl cellulose for a dose of 10 mg/kg; a total volume of 1 mL/100 g of this suspension was delivered orally (PO) to the mouse using a gavage tube.  
         [0000]     Effect of Naltrexone on Carbamazepine&#39;s Anticonvulsant Activity  
         [0069]     Mice from each cage were randomly assigned to one of three groups, vehicle+saline, carbamezepine (10 mg/kg, PO)+saline, or carbamezepine (10 mg/kg, PO)+naltrexone (3 mg/kg, IP). The carbamazepine or vehicle was dosed 60 minutes before testing and followed by a naltrexone or saline injection 30 minutes later. The mice were isolated from the test room and bell sound prior to testing. Each mouse&#39;s behavior in response to the bell was observed by two investigators and the agreed upon results were recorded.  
         [0000]     Results:  
         [0070]     Prior to testing, several mice were observed to exhibited spontaneous convulsions and several were found dead following the removal of the EtOH diet. Mice also appeared hyperactive with increased vocalizations when handled. While there was a trend towards an anticonvulsant effect of carbamazepine with/without naltrexone, no statistical differences were found between any of the drug groups on the audiogenic convulsion test (p=0.18, Table 5). Because this dose of carbamazepine (10 mg/kg) was reported to be active in a number of other convulsant models, these data suggest that either the drug was not effective acutely (and may require multiple doses prior to testing) or was ineffective in this model of convulsions. The data do indicate that naltrexone did not interact with carbamazepine at the dose tested and did not exacerbate the audiogenic-induced convulsions in mice exhibiting symptoms of alcohol withdrawal.  
                                     TABLE 5                           Coadministration of Carbamazepine and Naltrexone       on Audiogenic-Induced Convulsions                Carbamazepine   Naltrexone       Withdrawal Rating*           (10 mg/kg, PO)   (3 mg/kg, SC)   N   (mean ± sem)                       Vehicle   Saline   13   1.5 ± 0.2           Carbamazepine   Saline   14   1.1 ± 0.1           Carbamazepine   Naltrexone   15   1.1 ± 0.1                         *Behavioral response using a scale of 1-4 (see text)             
 
 Conclusions: 
 
         [0071]     In an animal model of alcohol withdrawal, naltrexone did not appear to interact (block or enhance) carbamezipine&#39;s anticonvulsant activity on an audiogenic-induced convulsion test.  
       Example 3  
       [0072]     The objective of this study is to determine whether opioid antagonists in combination with anticonvulsants increase the compliance as a treatment regime compared to treatment using the opioid antagonist alone. This endpoint of increased compliance is significant whether or not the treatment regime itself is successful, that is decreasing or eliminating alcohol consumption. It is important for the treating physician to know whether treatment failed because of “non-compliance” versus lack of responsiveness to the drug of choice or the dose of that drug, for example.  
         [0073]     Patients are observed initially in an in-patient setting of a hospital (for detoxification) and a community clinic (for follow-up). Alcoholics seeking withdrawal are selected for the study. Enrollment is conducted as follows: Enrollment criteria is current dependence and wish to transfer to naltrexone maintenance. Exclusion criteria include serious psychiatric problems, serious medical problems, especially acute liver disease or kidney damage, pregnancy, and concurrent drug addiction, especially benzodiazepine or heroin dependence.  
         [0074]     Upon enrollment, all patients are interviewed by a nurse and a doctor. Interviews last about an hour and cover alcohol use, including any drug use, treatment history, explanation of the proposed treatment, and exploration of patient goals and motivation. Standardized questionnaires (Severity of Dependence Scale [SDS], Severity of Alcohol Withdrawal Scale, Quality of Life Inventory and System Checklist-90, a global checklist of psychological functioning) are administered.  
         [0075]     Each patient is allocated a case manager who attends detoxification and conduct follow-up. Case managers comprise a psychologist, a registered nurse and a pharmacist with counseling qualifications.  
         [0076]     The initial detoxification uses opioid antagonists either alone or in combination with an anticonvulsant. Patients are discharged when they feel well enough. Follow-up is daily for four days and then weekly for up to three months for supportive care.  
         [0077]     The main outcome measurements include (A) the severity of adverse clinical manifestations; patient ratings of severity and acceptability of withdrawal; nights of hospitalization; rates of induction onto naltrexone; retention in treatment over three months; and relapse to alcohol use and (B) given success or failure of treatment based upon (A) above, did the patient receive (1) a combined dose of the naltrexone and the anticonvulsant of the invention in a single combination pill, (2) the combined dose of the instant invention in two different pills (one for naltrexone and one for the anticonvulsant) or (3) naltrexone alone.  
         [0078]     Modifications and variations of the invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art from the foregoing detailed description of the invention. Such modifications and variations are intended to come within the scope of the appended claims.