Abstract:
A method and apparatus for illuminating an object with white light, in which method the object is illuminated using lights of at least two different colors. The intensities of the lights are measured and then the intensity of illumination provided by means of a light of a single color is adjusted on the basis of the measured intensities of illumination provided by means of at least two different colors to improve the white balance of the object&#39;s illumination.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to white illumination, particularly to white illumination of a display. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The human eye perceives three main components of light: blue, red and green. On the basis of the ratio of the intensities of the main components, vision produces the visual sensation experienced by the viewer. Since vision is based on the ratio of the intensities, it compares the ratios of the main colour components of the light reflected by the object displayed with the colour of ambient light. 
     The colours of images shown on a display should look natural, i.e. the ratio of the intensities of the main components should correspond to the ratio the object would reflect when displayed in natural light. This naturally requires that when the object is being imaged, the balance between the main components, i.e. the white balance, should be adjusted to natural. Correspondingly, when images are to be reproduced, the display should naturally be capable of producing the displayed image correctly, i.e. the ratio of intensities of the main components should be correct. 
     When images are to be displayed, light may be directed towards the viewer to produce the image. This takes place for instance in television where a coloured picture is formed using three colour projectors. Another method is to form the picture on the surface whereby ambient light or light passing through the surface makes the image visible on portions of the surface to the viewer. One example of this is liquid crystal displays, or LCDs. A drawback of these displays is that in dim light the image (or text) displayed is difficult to distinguish. This is why liquid crystal displays are often provided with back or front illumination to illuminate the display by allowing white light either to reflect from the portion of the liquid crystal display that forms the image or to conduct through it. However, the illumination should not distort the colours of the picture so that they look unnatural and this is why the illumination must be provided using white light. 
     There are various ways of producing white light, but in mobile stations, for instance, usually the appropriate way to illuminate the display is to use relatively small components of low energy consumption. U.S. Pat. No. 5,998,925 discloses one example of illuminating the display with white LED (Light Emitting Diode) components. The white LED in question is produced by coating a blue LED with broadband, yellow phosphor which renders the light emitted by the LED white. The phosphorous layer absorbs some of the intensity produced by the blue LED and corrects the colour of the light so that it becomes white, transforming, however, at the same time some of the luminous power into heat. In fact, a better efficiency can be obtained by using LEDs of the main component colours together to produce white light, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,794. However, white light is difficult to produce with LEDs of different colours, because ageing and the temperature of the LEDs change their brightness. 
     In addition to the above problems, the white colour of the display varies not only because of a specific display illumination but also due to the impact of ambient light. Indoors, at the light of an incandescent lamp, the LCD display of a prior art laptop computer, which is illuminated by back or front illumination, looks typically slightly bluish, whereas outdoors it looks slightly reddish or yellowish. The phenomenon is caused by the change in the spectral distribution of ambient light. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention provides a method and apparatus which allow the above problems to be avoided or their impact to be reduced. 
     According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for producing white light for illuminating an object, in which method light of a first colour having a first luminous power and light of a second colour having a second luminous power are produced to illuminate the object, the method being characterised in that it comprises the steps of 
     measuring the first luminous power; 
     measuring the second luminous power; and 
     adjusting the white balance of the object&#39;s illumination by adjusting at least the first or the second luminous power at least on the basis of the luminous powers of the lights of the at least first and second colours. 
     Luminous power in this context refers to the light energy emitted by a light source per unit of time. The measurement of luminous power refers to the measurement of luminous power, or intensity, falling on a specific surface area, the measurement taking place at a specific distance from the light source and correlating with the emitted light efficiency. 
     An advantage of the method is that it provides an illumination having a white balance that can be corrected in response to changes in the illumination due to wearing of the light source or temperature changes, for example. In addition, the method allows lights of a plural number of different colours to be used for illuminating the object, while enabling a good white balance of the illumination to be maintained at the same time. The efficiency of the illumination is therefore better than for example if a light source of a single colour were used in which case some of the spectrum would be absorbed using a colour filter. 
     Preferably, lights of at least three different colours are produced for illuminating the object. Preferably the colours comprise blue, red and green. This allows an illumination approximating natural light to be provided. 
     Preferably the method also includes the measurement of the white balance of the object&#39;s ambient light and the adjustment of the luminous power of the light to be produced that comprises at least one colour in relation to at least one of the other luminous efficiencies to make the luminous power correspond better to the measured white balance of ambient light. This allows to compensate for the impact of changes in ambient light on the colours of the object. 
     Preferably in the method, said luminous powers of lights of different colours are preferably measured alternately, using at least partially common processing means. The use of common processing means renders the method of the invention inexpensive and relatively easy to implement for use in current and future digital devices. 
     The white balance of the object&#39;s illumination is preferably adjusted during illumination, for example, at periodically recurring intervals, or continuously. 
     Preferably the white balance of the object&#39;s illumination is controlled at a specific slowness to stabilise the control. The control is preferably carried out in small steps. 
     Preferably a first measurement unit is applied for measuring the luminous power of light of a first colour in a significantly normalised illumination with regard to the light in question to allow at least one individual measurement unit characteristic to be determined and to be used for correcting a later measurement. This allows the error caused into the white balance adjustment by the difference in the measurements of ambient light and illumination to be reduced. 
     The object to be illuminated with the method is preferably a display, the method also involving the presentation of visual information on the display. 
     The intensities referred to are preferably measured using measurement devices arranged in the vicinity of the display. 
     According to a second aspect of the invention, an apparatus for illuminating an object with white light is provided, the apparatus comprising: 
     first illuminating means for producing light of a first colour having a first luminous power; 
     second illuminating means for producing a light of a second colour having a second luminous power; 
     the apparatus being characterised in that it further comprises 
     means for measuring the first luminous power; 
     means for measuring the second luminous power; and 
     means for adjusting the white balance of the object&#39;s illumination by adjusting at least the first or second luminous power on the basis of the at least first and second luminous powers. 
     The apparatus preferably comprises more illuminating means for producing at least one light of a different colour. Yet more preferably the illumination of the object is carried out using lights of at least three different colours, which comprise blue, red and green light. This allows an illumination approximating natural light to be provided. 
     The apparatus preferably comprises also means for measuring the white balance of the object&#39;s ambient light and for adjusting at least one luminous power in relation to the measured white balance of ambient light. This allows to compensate for the impact of changes in ambient light on the colours of the object. 
     The apparatus preferably also comprises at least partially common processing means for alternately measuring the different luminous powers. Yet more preferably the at least partially common processing means are also arranged to adjust at least one luminous power. Due to the at least partially common processing means the apparatus of the invention is inexpensive and fairly easy to implement. 
     The apparatus is preferably arranged to adjust the white balance of the object&#39;s illumination during the illumination, for example, at periodically recurring intervals or continuously. 
     The apparatus is preferably arranged to adjust the white balance of the object&#39;s illumination at a predetermined slowness to stabilise the control, and even more preferably in small steps. 
     The apparatus is preferably arranged to apply a first measurement unit to measure the luminous power of light of a first colour in a significantly normalised illumination with regard to the light in question to determine at least one individual measurement unit characteristic and to use it for correcting a later measurement. 
     Preferably the apparatus comprises a display for visual presentation of information, the display being the object to be illuminated. 
     The means for measuring the first luminous power and the means for measuring the second luminous power are preferably arranged in the vicinity of the display. 
     The apparatus preferably comprises a photoconductor arranged in the vicinity of the display for conducting light to the display. The means for measuring the first luminous power and the means for measuring the second luminous power are preferably arranged in the vicinity of the photoconductor to measure the intensities of illumination provided by lights of different colours conducted through the photoconductor. 
     According to an alternative embodiment a portion of the display is arranged to serve at least occasionally as means for measuring at least one luminous power. 
     The at least one set of illuminating means is preferably arranged to make light scintillate according to a PWM-signal (Pulse Width Modulation). The luminous power of these illuminating means is preferably adjusted by changing the cycle ratio of the PWM-signal to adjust the glimmering so that a desired luminous power will be produced. 
     The invention is suitable for use in diverse objects, such as mobile stations, electronic books, digital cameras, digital video cameras, portable computers, displays provided with back illumination and those provided with front illumination. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     In the following the invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which 
     FIG. 1 illustrates a back-illumination system of a first embodiment of the invention; 
     FIG. 2 illustrates a back-illumination system of a second embodiment of the invention; 
     FIG. 3 illustrates a front-illumination system of a third embodiment of the invention; 
     FIG. 4 illustrates a front-illumination system of a fourth embodiment of the invention; 
     FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a mobile station of a fifth embodiment of the invention; 
     FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for adjusting the illumination system of the display of the mobile station of FIG. 5; and 
     FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for adjusting the illumination system of FIG.  6 . 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     FIG. 1 illustrates a back-illumination system  10  of a first embodiment of the invention. The back-illumination system  10  comprises a transparent, coloured liquid crystal display panel  11 , a photoconductor  12  behind the liquid crystal display and a colour balance sensor  13  for the back illumination, arranged in connection with the photoconductor, and a colour balance sensor  14  for ambient light. Both colour balance sensors are connected in series with a first differential amplifier  15 , a second differential amplifier  17  and an illuminator  18 . The back-illumination system  10  further comprises an adjustable power source  19  for operating the illuminator  18 . Both colour balance sensors  13  and  14  comprise R (red), G (green) and B (blue) units for measuring the intensities of the main components, i.e. red, green and blue light. The units are marked with corresponding letters after the reference numeral. The first and the second differential amplifiers both comprise corresponding three different units for the main components. The illuminator  18  also comprises corresponding three different units for forming the different main components. In the following, the operation of the system will be described in detail. 
     When the system is in operation, the photoconductor  12  conducts a backlight behind the liquid crystal display, the backlight comprising the three main components, i.e. red, green and blue. The first colour balance sensor  13  is optically arranged in connection with the photoconductor  12  (in this case after the photoconductor) to measure the intensities of the photoconductor&#39;s main components using respective measurement units  13 R,  13 G and  13 B. Correspondingly, the second colour balance sensor  14  measures the intensities of the main components of ambient light using measurement units  14 R,  14 G and  14 B. The measurement units of both colour balance sensors are arranged to produce output signals having the same sign. The outputs of the units corresponding to each main component of the first and the second colour balance sensors are led to the corresponding amplifier unit  15 R,  15 G and  15 B in the first differential amplifier  15 . For example, output signals corresponding to the red main component are relayed to the amplifier unit  15 R in the first differential amplifier, the amplifier unit generating an amplified difference signal  16 R proportional to the difference of the output signals of the measurement units  13 R and  14 R. Amplified difference signals  16 G and  16 B are also correspondingly generated. The amplified difference signals  16 R,  16 G and  16 B are relayed to the second differential amplifier  17 . The second differential amplifier  17  comprises amplifier units  17 R,  17 G and  17 B for the main components. In addition to the amplified difference signals, a supply signal having a minus sign is supplied to the second differential amplifier from the adjustable power source  19 . Each amplifier unit amplifies the supply signal coming from the amplifier unit and one amplified difference signal, and then generates an output proportional to the difference of the signals for operating an illuminating unit of an illuminator corresponding to one of the main components. This produces a feedback that adjusts the intensities of the illuminator&#39;s main components and, in an ideal case, controls the colour balance of the backlight to be in line with that of ambient light. 
     In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the colour balance sensors are scaled with resistors and/or amplifiers to set the brightness of the illumination to a desired level. 
     FIG. 2 illustrates a back-illumination system of a second embodiment of the invention in which system the first colour balance sensor  13  is placed under the photoconductor and therefore no space needs to be reserved adjacent to the photoconductor for the first colour balance sensor. 
     FIG. 3 illustrates a front-illumination system according to a third embodiment of the invention. In the front-illumination system of FIG. 3, the photoconductor  12  is placed on front side of the display to illuminate the display  11  from the front. 
     FIG. 4 illustrates a front-illumination system of a fourth embodiment of the invention where a first colour balance sensor  43  is integrated into the liquid crystal display panel  11 . Prior art knows that LED can be used for measuring light intensity. It is also known that LEDs of different colours have a different sensitivity for the different main components. It is also known that the LEDs are not necessarily capable of transmitting and receiving the same main components. However, a portion of the liquid crystal display panel  11  can be arranged to serve as the first colour balance sensor  13  of the first preferred embodiment, in which case a separate sensor is not needed. In that case, visual information is not presented on the portion of the liquid crystal display serving as the colour balance sensor when the display is being used for measuring colour balance. 
     FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a mobile station  50  of a fifth embodiment of the invention. The mobile station comprises a central processor unit CPU, memory RAM serving as the working memory of the CPU, non-volatile memory ROM which in turn comprises the operational instructions of the processor. The mobile station further comprises a display DSPL, display illumination  53  for illuminating the display, and a display illumination measurement block  52  and a backlight measurement block  51 . The processor is arranged to control the display illumination on the basis of the information provided by the backlight measurement block  51  and the display illumination measurement block  52 . 
     FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating the illumination system of the display of the mobile station shown in FIG.  5 . The system comprises a photoconductor  61  meant for illuminating the display, the light conducted by the conductor being measured by the illumination colour balance sensor  13 . The system further comprises the ambient light colour balance sensor  14  for measuring the colour balance of ambient light. These sensors correspond to the ones described above. In addition, the system comprises a first multiplexer connecting one measurement unit at a time to an AD converter  62  for converting a measurement signal to a digital message illustrating the intensity of the light component measured by the measurement unit in question. The AD converter is connected to the central processing unit CPU. The CPU receives the intensities of the different light components of both illumination and ambient light and uses the intensities to calculate new luminous efficiencies for the display illumination. The calculated luminous efficiencies are transmitted from the CPU through a second multiplexer MUX2 to corresponding control units  63 R,  63 G,  63 B. The control units control the light sources, i.e. in this case LEDs  18 R,  18 G and  18 B, meant for generating their respective light components through the operational connection provided by the unit  64 . The operational unit comprises switches  64 R,  64 G and  64 B for each light source, the switches switching off power supply to the light sources according to the control units&#39; commands. 
     The central processing unit CPU directs the first multiplexer to change the measurement unit ( 13 R- 13 B,  14 R- 14 B) currently connected to the AD converter so that each measurement unit is repeatedly connected to the AD converter. This allows the CPU to use the AD converter for determining the intensities of each light component both with regard to illumination and ambient light. The CPU calculates new control parameters repeatedly, typically at predetermined intervals, for controlling the illumination and transmits them through the second multiplexer MUX2 to the corresponding control units  63 R- 63 B. The CPU can thus control the first and the second multiplexers at points of time independent of each other. In the following, the operation of the CPU will be described in greater detail with reference to FIG.  7 . 
     FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for adjusting the illumination system of FIG.  6 . The flow diagram covers the initial configuration of the adjustment system and the phases related to its normal operation, the description of which will support the understanding of the invention. 
     The illumination system of FIG. 6 is based on a gradually proceeding iterative process where the difference in the ratios of the light component intensities of illumination are measured with respect to ratios of the light component intensities of ambient light, and illumination is adjusted such that the whiteness of illumination would correspond to that of ambient light as well as possible. In this embodiment, the brightness of illumination, i.e. the sum of the light component intensities, is adjusted at the same time. Brightness may also be adjusted intelligently such that brightness is increased in a low-light environment and reduced or completely switched off in a well-illuminated environment. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, this is carried out by an attempt to standardise the product of the brightness of illumination and brightness of ambient light, the brightness of illumination being thus inversely proportional to the brightness of ambient light. 
     It should be noted that the numerical values given below are arbitrarily chosen and that in reality the constants to be formed strongly depend on how sensitive the measuring devices are. 
     In the following, the flow diagram of FIG. 7 will be described in greater detail with reference to Table I below. Based on a simulated calculation carried out by a spreadsheet program, the table illustrates the operation of the method depicted by the flow diagram. 
     The flow diagram starts from block “begin”. In the next block, correction coefficients are determined for each light component measurement unit (altogether 3+3=6) for correcting individual variation in the sensitivities of the light component measurement units. For the sake of simplicity, the use of level correction factors is ignored in this embodiment, although there is also an alternative embodiment where the output of the measurement units is corrected using not only correction coefficients but also level correction factors which are summed to the measurements preferably prior to the sensitivity correction. 
     In addition to correction coefficients, also filtering constants used in the adjustment are determined, the constants having an impact on the speed and, thereby, the stability (low oscillation tendency) of the adjustment. In addition, initial control coefficients are determined in connection with the initial configuration. In this embodiment the control coefficients are coefficients used for controlling the intensity of each light source of illumination on the next adjustment round. 
     After the above measures, which are usually carried out at the manufacturing plant, the device is taken in use and the actual adjustment process begins. First the intensities (R, G, B) of the light components of illumination and those of ambient light are measured and multiplied by the correction coefficients to produce corrected intensities. 
     Next, the sum of the corrected intensities is calculated to obtain brightness. This is followed by calculating the proportion of the corrected intensity representing each light component of brightness, which allows the reciprocal ratios of the light components to be obtained. For example, Table I first determines the proportion of red component R of brightness: it is 0.215 with regard to ambient light and 0.170 with regard to illumination. The ratio of the proportions is 0.215/0.170=1.263. Table I also comprises a standard deviation calculated from the ratios of the proportions and illustrating a computational difference in whiteness between illumination and ambient light. The greater the standard deviation, the greater the difference will be determined. 
     The proportion of the brightness of illumination with regard to the target is then calculated to be used later for adjusting brightness towards the target. In the example of Table I, the target value for brightness is 100 (in the units used in the table) and in the first measurement the proportion of brightness (brightness ratio) is 70.47% of the target. 
     Next, new control coefficients are calculated. This calculation is carried out in two phases. First, new control coefficients corrected according to the differences in the ratios of the proportions are calculated. Then the new control coefficients are level-corrected to adjust brightness towards the desired level. 
     Each new ratio-corrected control coefficient (for R, G and B components) is calculated from the previous control coefficient on the basis of the ratio of the proportions of ambient light and illumination in the corresponding light component. The new ratio-corrected control coefficient is: the previous control coefficient×(1−ratio correction factor+ratio correction factor×ratio). Table I shows the new control coefficients thus calculated: 
     
       
         
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
               
                 R 
                 G 
                 B 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 1.132 
                 1.072 
                 0.862 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     In other words, ratio correction aims at increasing illumination provided by components R and G and decreasing illumination provided by component B. By applying the ratio correction factor for filtering the adjustment, the adjustment can be slowed down, which in turn provides improved adjustment stability. 
     After the ratio correction, level-corrected control coefficients for controlling illumination are calculated for the next control round. Similarly as in ratio correction, level correction also employs filtering for stabilising the adjustment, i.e. for reducing oscillation tendency. The level-corrected control coefficient of R, for example, is calculated using the following formula: 
     
       
         ratio-corrected control coefficient×(1−level correction factor+level correction factor×(1/brightness ratio of illumination)).  
       
     
     When the level-corrected control coefficients have been calculated, they are taken in use to replace the former control coefficients for controlling the intensities of the light components of illumination. The intensities change in the same proportion as the control coefficients, assuming that the electric components used for illumination, i.e. the LEDs in this case, are linear in their operation. 
     At the beginning of the next adjustment round, the intensities of the light components are again measured with regard to both ambient light and illumination. In this example, the proportional change with regard to each previous measurement of a light component of the ambient is randomly determined, a new “measurement” being provided by the following equation: 
     
       
         (1+(RAND( )−0.5)×random factor — 1)×previous measurement.  
       
     
     Similarly, new intensities for the illumination components are measured. The new intensities differ from the previous ones in proportion to the change in the control coefficients. To depict errors possibly occurring in the adjustment and the measurement, adjustment is here disturbed by subjecting the new computational measurements of illumination to some randomness. The new measured (uncorrected) measurement of component R of illumination is calculated by applying the following equation: 
     
       
         (1+(RAND( )−0.5)×random factor — 2)×previous measurement×level-corrected control coefficient/previous control coefficient.  
       
     
     On the basis of the new measurements, corrected measurement results are again calculated, the results being then used for producing new level-corrected control coefficients, and so on. 
     With reference to FIG. 7, Table I below shows a simulated example of the operation of the method of adjustment. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE I 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 A simulated example of the operation of the method of adjustment. 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 component 
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Correction constants 
                 R 
                 G 
                 B 
                   
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Constants: 
               
               
                 ambient light 
                 2.125 
                 1.800 
                 1.600 
               
               
                 illumination 
                 1.200 
                 0.834 
                 0.920 
               
               
                 Ratio correction factor 
                 0.500 
               
               
                 level correction factor 
                 0.300 
               
               
                 random factor_1 
                 0.100 
               
               
                 random factor_2 
                 0.050 
               
               
                 illumination target sum: 
                 100 
                   
                   
                 Total: 
               
               
                 illumination control 
                 1.000 
                 1.000 
                 1.000 
                 3 
               
               
                 coefficients at the 
               
               
                 beginning 
               
               
                 Measurement 1 
               
               
                 ambient light 
                 4.000 
                 11.000 
                 7.000 
               
               
                 illumination 
                 10.000 
                 37.000 
                 30.000 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Measurements 1 corrected with correction coefficients 
                 total: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 8.499 
                 19.800 
                 11.200 
                 39.4988 
               
               
                 illumination 
                 12.000 
                 30.865 
                 27.600 
                 70.4654 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 of the 
                 70.47% 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 target: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 The ratio of measurements 1 corrected with correction coefficients to the 
               
               
                 sum of the components 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 0.215 
                 0.501 
                 0.284 
                   
               
               
                 illumination 
                 0.170 
                 0.438 
                 0.392 
                 st. dev. 
               
               
                 ratio 
                 1.263 
                 1.144 
                 0.724 
                 0.2835 
               
               
                 New control coefficients 
                   
                   
                   
                 Total: 
               
               
                 ratio-corrected: 
                 1.132 
                 1.072 
                 0.862 
               
               
                 level-corrected: 
                 1.274 
                 1.207 
                 0.970 
                 3.4514 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 ratio to 
                 115.0% 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 previous 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Adjustment round 1, new measurements: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 4.078 
                 11.283 
                 6.920 
                   
               
               
                 illumination 
                 12.817 
                 43.883 
                 29.220 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Measurements 2 corrected with correction coefficients 
                 total: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 8.664 
                 20.309 
                 11.072 
                 40.0450 
               
               
                 illumination 
                 15.381 
                 36.607 
                 26.882 
                 78.8698 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 of the 
                 78.87% 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 target: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 The ratio of measurements 2 corrected with correction coefficients to the 
               
               
                 sum of the components 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 0.216 
                 0.507 
                 0.276 
                   
               
               
                 illumination 
                 0.195 
                 0.464 
                 0.341 
                 st. dev. 
               
               
                 ratio 
                 1.109 
                 1.093 
                 0.811 
                 0.1675 
               
               
                 New control coefficients 
                   
                   
                   
                 Total: 
               
               
                 ratio-corrected: 
                 1.344 
                 1.263 
                 0.879 
               
               
                 level-corrected: 
                 1.452 
                 1.364 
                 0.949 
                 3.7656 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 ratio to 
                 109.1% 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 previous 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Adjustment round 2, new measurements: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 3.981 
                 11.576 
                 6.732 
                   
               
               
                 illumination 
                 11.369 
                 41.631 
                 28.731 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Measurements 3 corrected with correction coefficients 
                 total: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 8.458 
                 20.837 
                 10.771 
                 40.0664 
               
               
                 illumination 
                 13.643 
                 34.728 
                 26.432 
                 74.8031 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 of the 
                 74.80% 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 target: 
               
             
          
           
               
                 The ratio of measurements 3 corrected with correction coefficients to the 
               
               
                 sum of the components 
               
             
          
           
               
                 ambient light 
                 0.211 
                 0.520 
                 0.269 
                   
               
               
                 illumination 
                 0.182 
                 0.464 
                 0.353 
                 st. dev. 
               
               
                 ratio 
                 1.158 
                 1.120 
                 0.761 
                 0.2191 
               
               
                 New control coefficients 
                   
                   
                   
                 Total: 
               
               
                 ratio-corrected: 
                 1.566 
                 1.446 
                 0.836 
               
               
                 level-corrected: 
                 1.724 
                 1.593 
                 0.920 
                 4.2373 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 ratio to 
                 112.5% 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 previous 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     In Table II the simulation of Table I is followed during several adjustment rounds. Table II shows how the adjustment reduces both the difference of brightness with regard to the target (level difference, %) and the deviation in the ratios of the light components (the standard deviation, or st.dev.) On each adjustment round, new control coefficients are calculated for light sources corresponding to each light component, the coefficients being then used for operating the light sources. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE II 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Operation of illumination adjustment during several control rounds 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 control coefficients 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 round: 
                 st. dev. 
                 level diff. % 
                 R 
                 G 
                 B 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 0 
                 0.28346 
                 29.5% 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                   
                 1 
                 0.16753 
                 21.1% 
                 1.274 
                 1.207 
                 0.970 
               
               
                   
                 2 
                 0.21909 
                 25.2% 
                 1.452 
                 1.364 
                 0.949 
               
               
                   
                 3 
                 0.05642 
                 4.9% 
                 1.724 
                 1.593 
                 0.920 
               
               
                   
                 4 
                 0.05745 
                 3.4% 
                 1.694 
                 1.620 
                 0.957 
               
               
                   
                 5 
                 0.01882 
                 2.5% 
                 1.657 
                 1.638 
                 0.991 
               
               
                   
                 6 
                 0.02412 
                 0.5% 
                 1.653 
                 1.649 
                 1.007 
               
               
                   
                 7 
                 0.04765 
                 −0.6% 
                 1.682 
                 1.647 
                 1.002 
               
               
                   
                 8 
                   
                   
                 1.735 
                 1.626 
                 0.996 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Table II also shows that the standard deviation of the different colour components decreases faster than the level difference. The reason for this is the higher coefficient used in the filtering. Adjustment rounds are preferably carried out frequently and filtering is used to control that the changes in illumination are so small that the illumination does not appear to be flickering when the adjustment is in operation and yet the changes are carried out rapidly and conveniently. 
     In an alternative embodiment of the invention, filtering factors of different values are provided in accordance with the direction of change of the illumination, the brightness of the illumination being increased more rapidly than decreased. This is advantageous for example when the invention is applied in a mobile station which may suddenly move into a shadow so that it is difficult to read the display properly. On the other hand, a display which is too brightly illuminated does not cause any major problems in viewing the display, but only wears the battery more rapidly. Choosing the correct filtering factors therefore has an impact on both ergonomics and the energy consumption of the device. 
     The above described control coefficients allow illumination to be adjusted by applying for example PWM control (Pulse Width Modulation). Each light source is controlled to illuminate the photoconductor with a pulsating light of a sufficiently high frequency (such as 25, 70 or 5000 Hz) to make it appear flicker-free. A PWM signal is used to implement illumination as a specific control-coefficient-dependent portion X of each sequence. X may be obtained for example by the following equation: 
     
       
           X =control coefficient/control coefficient max ,  
       
     
     wherein the control coefficient max  is typically a pre-selected constant that exceeds the normal maximum value of the control coefficient. The control coefficient max  may be a common factor for all control coefficients, or it may be separately set for each light component. 
     In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the system comprises memory for storing previous colour balance measurements. The memory allows the system to adjust the colour balance of illumination even in situations where the intensity of ambient light becomes too low for any measurements. 
     In addition, the memory can be used for implementing another alternative embodiment of the invention in which the liquid crystal display panel is illuminated with a pulsating light that has a high frequency, &gt;20 Hz, with regard to the perception ability of the human eye. The colour balance meter is also used, during pauses in the illumination, for measuring the colour balance of ambient light and, during the illumination, for measuring the colour balance of illumination. This allows errors in measurement caused by differences between the measurement units to be completely avoided when the intensities of the light components of illumination and ambient light are to be evaluated. This also allows the above-described initial calibration to be left out without harming the white balance of the device. Although this may slightly change the brightness adjustment, because of a deviation in an individual measurement unit, the user may be provided with a manual brightness adjustment which allows the user to obtain the desired target level for brightness. 
     The above description illustrates the implementation and the embodiments of the invention with references to examples. It is apparent to a person skilled in the art that the invention is not restricted to the details of the above described embodiments and that there are also other alternatives for implementing the invention without deviating from the characteristics of the invention. The described embodiments should be considered to be illustrative, but not restrictive. The alternatives for implementing the invention and using it are therefore only restricted by the accompanying claims, the various alternative embodiments defined in the claims, and also any equivalent implementations, being thus included in the scope of the invention.