Abstract:
An object of the invention is to discover at the chip level a portion of a high density of contact holes in wires of a large area that becomes a portion where wire defects will occur. In order to achieve this, the area ratio of the total area of wires of the same node to the total area of contact holes in the wires of the same node is limited in a chip layout and wire formation defects are detected by determining whether or not defects exists based on this limitation. Thus, defects are detected wherein the area ratio exceeds the limit at the layout design stage and thereby formation defects such as a disconnection of a wire of a large area, a wire breakdown, a surface peeling due to a hillock or a defective connection between a wire and a contact hole can be avoided.

Description:
[0001]     This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/715,119, filed Nov. 18, 2003, the priority of which is claimed under 35 USC §120. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]     1. Field of the Invention  
         [0003]     This invention relates in particular to the semiconductor device layout inspection method for taking measures of the wire formation defects.  
         [0004]     2. Description of the Prior Art  
         [0005]     Conventionally, the following measurements have been carried out in order to prevent the occurrence of hillocks in wires of a large area covered with an insulating film, which is a thin film and in order to prevent wire defects from occurring at the time of manufacturing the semiconductor device.  
         [0006]     The width and the length of a wire is divided into pieces no greater than the critical dimensions so that no hillocks will occur in a semiconductor device having wires of a large area formed on a semiconductor substrate via an insulating film as shown, for example, in Japanese unexamined patent publication H8 (1996)-115914. Then the respective wires that have been divided are electrically connected to each other by means of other wires. The wires for connecting the wires that have been divided are placed in a non-overlapping manner so that no hillocks will occur in the combination with the wires that have been divided.  
         [0007]     Wire uplift due to a hillock and a defect of a connection portion of a contact hole and a wire may occur in the step of ashing or of washing in the case wherein the contact holes are provided in a high concentration in wires of a large area according to a conventional manufacture of a semiconductor device. Thereby, a disconnection of a wire, a breakdown of a wire and a surface peeling will occur in a portion of wires of a large area due to the heat at the time of deposition of a CVD film as an upper layer.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0008]     An object of this invention is to provide a semiconductor device layout inspection method wherein a portion of a high density of contact holes in wires of a large area where wire defects will occur can be detected at the chip level.  
         [0009]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the first invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, wherein the wire formation defects are detected by checking the relationship between the layout of the contact holes in the wires and the layout of the wires.  
         [0010]     According to the first invention the wire formation defects are detected by checking the relationship between the layout of the contact holes in the wires and the layout of the wires and, therefore, occurrence of hillocks can be prevented so that wire defects can be prevented from occurring at the time of manufacturing a semiconductor device in the case wherein the density of the contact holes is high in the wires of a large area.  
         [0011]     It is preferable in the method according to the first invention for the layout of wires where wire formation defects have been detected to be corrected.  
         [0012]     Thus, defects of wire peeling due to hillocks on wires having a wide width can be reduced in the case wherein the layout of wires where wire formation defects have been detected is corrected.  
         [0013]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the second invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, wherein the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node of the chip layout so that existence of defects is determined based on this limitation.  
         [0014]     According to the second invention, the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node of the chip layout so that existence of defects is determined based on this limitation and, therefore, defects that exceed the area ratio limitation can be detected at the layout designing stage and, thereby, formation defects such as wire disconnections, breakdowns and peelings from the surface of the wires of a large area due to hillocks and failures in connections between the wires and contact holes can be avoided.  
         [0015]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the third invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, wherein the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the number of contact holes in the wires of the same node so that existence of defects is determined based on this number limitation.  
         [0016]     According to the third invention, the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the number of contact holes in the wires of the same node so that existence of defects is determined based on this number limitation and, therefore, defects that exceed the number limitation can be detected at the layout designing stage and, thereby, formation defects such as wire disconnections, breakdowns and peelings from the surface of the wires of a large area due to hillocks and failures in connections between the wires and contact holes can be avoided.  
         [0017]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the fourth invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, wherein the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the number of contact holes in the wires having a constant width so that existence of defects is determined based on this number limitation.  
         [0018]     According to the fourth invention the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the number of contact holes in the wires having a constant width so that existence of defects is determined based on this number limitation and, therefore, defects that exceed the number limitation can be detected at the layout designing stage and, thereby, formation defects such as wire disconnections, breakdowns and peelings from the surface of the wires of a large area due to hillocks and failures in connections between the wires and contact holes can be avoided.  
         [0019]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the fifth invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, wherein the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the total area of contact holes in the wires having a constant width so that existence of defects is determined based on this area limitation.  
         [0020]     According to the fifth invention the wire formation defects are detected by providing limitation to the total area of contact holes in the wires having a constant width so that existence of defects is determined based on this area limitation and, therefore, defects that exceed the area limitation can be detected at the layout designing stage and, thereby, formation defects such as wire disconnections, breakdowns and peelings from the surface of the wires of a large area due to hillocks and failures in connections between the wires and contact holes can be avoided.  
         [0021]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the sixth invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of calculating the total area of the wires of the same node and the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node; and the step of determining the area limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node, wherein the area of the same node is detected as a wire formation defect when the total area of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the area limitation value.  
         [0022]     According to the sixth invention the step of calculating the total area of the wires of the same node and the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node; and the step of determining the area limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node are included, wherein the area of the same node is detected as a wire formation defect when the total area of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the area limitation value and, therefore, the limitation of the total area of the contact holes varies in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node and, thereby, the same working effects as of the second invention can be gained and the limitation value can be microscopically adjusted with a high precision in accordance with the width/area of the wires.  
         [0023]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the seventh invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of calculating the total area of the wires of the same node and the number of the contact holes in the wires of the same node; and the step of determining the number limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node, wherein the area of the same node is detected as a wire formation defect when the number of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the number limitation value.  
         [0024]     According to the seventh invention, the step of calculating the total area of the wires of the same node and the number of the contact holes in the wires of the same node; and the step of determining the number limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node, are provided wherein the area of the same node is detected as a wire formation defect when the number of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the number limitation value and, therefore, the number limitation of the contact holes varies in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node and, thereby, the same working effects as of the third invention can be gained and the limitation value can be microscopically adjusted with a high precision in accordance with the width/area of the wires.  
         [0025]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the eighth invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of calculating the number of the contact holes in the wires having a constant width; and the step of determining the number limitation value of the contact holes that varies in accordance with the wire width, wherein the area concerning the contact holes is detected as a wire formation defect when the number of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the number limitation value.  
         [0026]     According to the eighth invention, the step of calculating the number of the contact holes in the wires having a constant width; and the step of determining the number limitation value of the contact holes that varies in accordance with the wire width, are provided wherein the area concerning the contact holes is detected as a wire formation defect when the number of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the number limitation value and, therefore, the number limitation of the contact holes varies in accordance with the width of the wires and, thereby, the same working effects as of the fourth invention can be gained and the limitation value can be microscopically adjusted with a high precision in accordance with the width/area of the wires.  
         [0027]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the ninth invention for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of calculating the total area of the contact holes in the wires having a constant width; and the step of determining the area limitation value of the contact holes that varies in accordance with the wire width, wherein the area concerning the contact holes is detected as a wire formation defect when the total area of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the area limitation value.  
         [0028]     According to the ninth invention, the step of calculating the total area of the contact holes in the wires having a constant width; and the step of determining the area limitation value of the contact holes that varies in accordance with the wire width are provided, wherein the area concerning the contact holes is detected as a wire formation defect when the total area of the contact holes is equal to, or is greater than, the area limitation value and, therefore, the area limitation of the contact holes varies in accordance with the width of the wires and, thereby, the same working effects as of the fifth invention can be gained and the limitation value can be microscopically adjusted with a high precision in accordance with the width/area of the wires.  
         [0029]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the tenth invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of dividing the entire area of the chip layout into a plurality of inspection regions; and the step of providing limitation to the number of the contact holes in the wires having a constant width in an inspection region from among the plurality of inspection regions so that a wire formation defect is detected by determining the existence of a defect based on this number limitation, wherein the step of detecting a wire formation defect is repeated in a scanning manner until the plurality of inspection regions on the entire surface of the chip layout is inspected.  
         [0030]     According to the tenth invention, the step of dividing the entire area of the chip layout into a plurality of inspection regions; and the step of providing limitation to the number of the contact holes in the wires having a constant width in an inspection region from among the plurality of inspection regions so that a wire formation defect is detected by determining the existence of a defect based on this number limitation are provided, wherein the step of detecting a wire formation defect is repeated in a scanning manner until the plurality of inspection regions on the entire surface of the chip layout is inspected and, therefore, the same inspection as of the fourth invention is carried out in an inspection region and such an inspection is repeated for every inspection region, the total of which covers the entire surface so that the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed. A local portion wherein contacts are located in a high density can be inspected so as to avoid a formation defect by dividing the entirety of the chip into regions in contrast to the inspection of the entire surface of the chip.  
         [0031]     The entire surface inspection for inspecting the entire chip surface of the chip layout and a partial inspection for inspecting a portion of a chip may have different scanning intervals of the inspection regions in the configuration of the tenth invention.  
         [0032]     Thus the entire surface inspection for inspecting the entire chip surface of the chip layout and a partial inspection for inspecting a portion of a chip may have different scanning intervals of the inspection regions and, therefore, an appropriate scanning interval can be selected in accordance with a purpose such that the processing turn around time (hereinafter abbreviated as TAT) is prioritized for the inspection of the entire surface of the chip and a detailed inspection is prioritized for a partial inspection.  
         [0033]     The entire surface inspection for inspecting the entire chip surface of the chip layout and a partial inspection for inspecting a portion of the chip may have different sizes of the inspection regions in the configuration of the tenth invention.  
         [0034]     Thus, an appropriate size of the inspection region can be selected in accordance with a purpose such that the processing TAT is prioritized for the inspection of the entire chip surface and a detailed inspection is prioritized for a partial inspection.  
         [0035]     It is preferable to provide limitation to the number of the contact holes in wires having a constant width after wires connected to contact holes of which the number is less than a constant number in the chip layout has been removed in advance in the configuration of the fourth invention.  
         [0036]     Thus, limitation is provided to the number of the contact holes in wires having a constant width after wires connected to contact holes of which the number is less than a constant number in the chip layout has been removed in advance and, therefore, the minimum number of contact holes in the wires having a certain possibility of the occurrence of defects is defined so that the wires which do not require inspection are removed in accordance with the number of contact holes before the number limitation of the contact holes is provided in the same manner as in the fourth invention and, thereby, the process TAT can be shortened.  
         [0037]     It is preferable to provide limitation to the number of the contact holes in wires having a constant width in inspection regions that have been limited to the inspection regions having contact holes of which the number is equal to, or greater than, a constant number from among the plurality of inspection regions in the configuration of the tenth invention.  
         [0038]     Thus, limitation is provided to the number of the contact holes in wires having a constant width in inspection regions that have been limited to the inspection regions having contact holes of which the number is equal to, or greater than, a constant number from among the plurality of inspection regions and, therefore, the number limitation of the contact holes can be carried out in the same manner as in the tenth invention without selecting inspection regions which do not require inspections in accordance with the number of contact holes so that the processing TAT can be shortened.  
         [0039]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the eleventh invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of dividing the entire area of the chip layout into a plurality of inspection regions; and the step of providing limitation to the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node using an antenna check in an inspection region from among the plurality of inspection regions so that a wire formation defect is detected by determining the existence of a defect based on this limitation, wherein the step of detecting a wire formation defect is repeated in a scanning manner until the plurality of inspection regions on the entire surface of the chip layout is inspected.  
         [0040]     According to the eleventh invention the step of dividing the entire area of the chip layout into a plurality of inspection regions; and the step of providing limitation to the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node using an antenna check in an inspection region from among the plurality of inspection regions so that a wire formation defect is detected by determining the existence of a defect based on this limitation, are provided wherein the step of detecting a wire formation defect is repeated in a scanning manner until the plurality of inspection regions on the entire surface of the chip layout is inspected and, therefore, the same inspection as in the second invention is carried out in an inspection region and such an inspection is repeated in a scanning manner for every inspection regions of which the total covers the entire surface so that the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed. Therefore, formation defects such as wire disconnections, breakdowns and peelings from the surface of the wires of a large area due to hillocks and failures in connections between the wires and contact holes can be avoided. In addition, the ratio of the conventional gates to the contacts connected to the gates is calculated according to the antenna check, which can be applied to the above inspection by using wires instead of the gates.  
         [0041]     The semiconductor device layout inspection method according to the twelfth invention is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a chip layout, comprising: the step of defining a partial inspection region in the chip layout; and the step of providing limitation to the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node using an antenna check in the partial inspection region so that a wire formation defect is detected by determining the existence of a defect based on this limitation, wherein the step of detecting a wire formation defect is repeated in a scanning manner using a density check until the total of partial inspection regions cover the entire surface of the chip layout.  
         [0042]     According to the twelfth invention the step of defining a partial inspection region in the chip layout; and the step of providing limitation to the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node using an antenna check in the partial inspection region so that a wire formation defect is detected by determining the existence of a defect based on this limitation are provided, wherein the step of detecting a wire formation defect is repeated in a scanning manner using a density check until the total of partial inspection regions cover the entire surface of the chip layout and, therefore, the same inspection as in the second invention is carried out within a partial inspection region and such an inspection is repeated in a scanning manner for every partial inspection region of which the total covers the entire surface and, thereby, the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed. Thus, formation defects such as wire disconnections, breakdowns and peelings from the surface of the wires of a large area due to hillocks and failures in connections between the wires and contact holes can be avoided. In addition, the ratio of the conventional gates to the contacts connected to the gates is calculated according to the antenna check, which can be applied to the above inspection by using wires instead of the gates. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0043]      FIG. 1  is a layout diagram showing wire and contact hole layers in a semiconductor layout utilized for an embodiment of this invention;  
         [0044]      FIG. 2  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the first embodiment of this invention;  
         [0045]      FIG. 3  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the first embodiment of this invention;  
         [0046]      FIGS. 4A, 4B ,  4 C and  4 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the first embodiment of this invention;  
         [0047]      FIG. 5  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the second embodiment of this invention;  
         [0048]      FIG. 6  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the second embodiment of this invention;  
         [0049]      FIGS. 7A, 7B ,  7 C and  7 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the second embodiment of this invention;  
         [0050]      FIG. 8  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the third embodiment of this invention;  
         [0051]      FIG. 9  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the third embodiment of this invention;  
         [0052]      FIGS. 10A, 10B ,  10 C and  10 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the third embodiment of this invention;  
         [0053]      FIG. 11  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the fourth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0054]      FIG. 12  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the fourth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0055]      FIGS. 13A, 13B ,  13 C and  13 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the fourth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0056]      FIG. 14  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the fifth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0057]      FIG. 15  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the fifth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0058]      FIGS. 16A, 16B ,  16 C,  16 D and  16 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the fifth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0059]      FIG. 17  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the sixth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0060]      FIG. 18  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the sixth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0061]      FIGS. 19A, 19B ,  19 C,  19 D and  19 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the sixth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0062]      FIG. 20  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the seventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0063]      FIG. 21  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the seventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0064]      FIGS. 22A, 22B ,  22 C,  22 D and  22 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the seventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0065]      FIG. 23  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the eighth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0066]      FIG. 24  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the eighth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0067]      FIGS. 25A, 25B ,  25 C,  25 D and  25 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the eighth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0068]      FIG. 26  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the ninth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0069]      FIG. 27  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the ninth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0070]      FIGS. 28A, 28B ,  28 C and  28 D are diagrams showing a region wherein the number of contact holes is collectively inspected according to the ninth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0071]      FIGS. 29A, 29B ,  29 C,  29 D and  29 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the ninth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0072]      FIGS. 30A, 30B ,  30 C,  30 D,  30 E and  30 F are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the ninth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0073]      FIG. 31  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the tenth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0074]      FIG. 32  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the tenth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0075]      FIGS. 33A, 33B ,  33 C,  33 D and  33 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the tenth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0076]      FIG. 34  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0077]      FIG. 35  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0078]      FIGS. 36A, 36B ,  36 C and  36 D are diagrams showing a region wherein the number of contact holes is collectively inspected according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0079]      FIGS. 37A, 37B ,  37 C,  37 D and  37 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0080]      FIGS. 38A, 38B ,  38 C and  38 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0081]      FIGS. 39A, 39B ,  39 C,  39 D and  39 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0082]      FIG. 40  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the twelfth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0083]      FIG. 41  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the twelfth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0084]      FIGS. 42A, 42B ,  42 C and  42 D are diagrams showing a region wherein the number of contact holes is collectively inspected according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention;  
         [0085]      FIGS. 43A, 43B ,  43 C and  43 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the twelfth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0086]      FIG. 44  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the thirteenth embodiment of this invention;  
         [0087]      FIG. 45  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the thirteenth embodiment of this invention; and  
         [0088]      FIGS. 46A, 46B ,  46 C and  46 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the thirteenth embodiment of this invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS  
       [0089]     The first embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 1, 2 ,  3 ,  4 A,  4 B,  4 C and  4 D.  
         [0090]      FIG. 1  is a layout diagram showing wire and contact hole layers in a semiconductor layout that is used for the embodiment of this invention.  
         [0091]     In  FIG. 1 , symbol  11  indicates the outermost periphery of a chip, symbol  12  indicates a layout of a wire layer and symbol  13  indicates a layout of a contact hole layer.  
         [0092]      FIG. 3  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the first embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 4A, 4B ,  4 C and  4 D are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the first embodiment of this invention. In the following, the inspection process is described in reference to the flowchart.  
         [0093]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a large area in a chip layout, wherein the area ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node is limited in the chip layout and the wire formation defects are detected by determining whether or not defects exist based on this limitation.  
         [0094]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 4A, 4B  and  4 C, a region  19  having four sides of the minimum wire interval W is defined in a layout  14  and a wire  15  which region  19  overlaps is selected from among the wires in layout  14 . Since region  19  has the minimum wire interval, the selected wire  15  always becomes of the same node. In the case wherein region  19  does not overlap the wire of layout  14 , region  19  is shifted by minimum wire interval W so as not to overlap the previous position within layout  14  and the next region is selected and it is determined whether or not the selected region overlaps the wire layer of layout  14 . The determination is repeated (Step  1 A) until the entire surface of the layout has completely be scanned or the next wire of the same node has been found.  
         [0095]     The area of the selected wire  15  of the same node is calculated (Step  1 B). Wire  15  having a contact hole  17  and wire  16  having a contact hole  18  are of different nodes ( FIG. 4D ). Contact hole  17  that overlaps wire  15  selected in step  1 A is selected (Step  1 C). The total area of contact hole  17  selected in step  1 C is calculated (Step  1 D). The area ratio is calculated (Step  1 E) from the area of wire  15  of the same node that has been calculated in step  1 B and from the total area of contact hole  17  that has been calculated in step  1 D. At this time, contact hole  17  and contact hole  18  are located in wires of different nodes and, therefore, the area ratios are separately calculated. In the case wherein the area ratio of step  1 E becomes equal to, or greater than, the limitation value, the area is detected as an error portion where wire formation defects occur (Step  1 F).  
         [0096]     Next, wires that have been selected in step  1 A are eliminated from input layout  14  (Step  1 G). Wires of the same node that have once been selected in step  1 G are eliminated from input layout  14  so as not to be selected twice and, therefore, a high speed CAD process can be implemented. It is determined (Step  1 H) whether or not region  19  selected in step  1 A has scanned the entire surface of the input layout. The procedure returns to step  1 A so as to be repeated in the case wherein region  19  that has not been scanned exists. The inspection is completed after the entire surface has been scanned.  
         [0097]      FIG. 2  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the first embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0098]     As shown in  FIG. 2 , wire data  15  is selected and outputted as the same node in the case wherein a region that overlaps wire data  15  of the inputted layout data  14  exists in same node wire recognition step  1   a  wherein a region  19  of the minimum wire interval is defined. The selected wire data  15  and layout data  14  are inputted in contact recognition step  1   b  so that contact hole data  17  in layout data  14  that overlaps wire data  15  is selected and outputted. The selected same node wire data  15  and the selected contact hole data  17  are inputted in area calculation step  1   c  so that the respective total areas are calculated. The area ratio of the area of same node wire data  15  to the area of contact hole data  17  is calculated and outputted in area ratio calculation step  1   d , wherein the respective areas have been calculated in area calculation step  1   c.    
         [0099]     The selected wire data  15  and contact hole data  17  are outputted as errors in the case wherein the area ratio and the error conditions are compared and the area ratio does not satisfy the conditions in error determination step  1   e . Layout data  14  and wire data  15  are inputted in layout data update step  1   f  and the layout data gained by subtracting wire data  15  that has been selected in same node wire recognition step  1   a  from input layout data  14  is output and this outputted data is used as input layout data for the wires to be inspected next.  
         [0100]     As a result of the above described procedure locations wherein wire formation defects occur in the input layout can be detected.  
         [0101]     The second embodiment of this invention is described based on  FIGS. 5, 6 ,  7 A,  7 B,  7 C and  7 D.  
         [0102]      FIG. 6  is a flowchart showing the inspection algorithm according to the second embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 7A, 7B ,  7 C and  7 D are diagrams showing the inspection process according to the second embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described in accordance with the flowchart.  
         [0103]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that occur to large area wires in the chip layout wherein the number of contact holes in wires of the same node is limited and the existence of defects is determined based on this number limitation and, thereby, the locations of wire formation defects are detected.  
         [0104]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 7A, 7B  and  7 C, a region  26  with four sides having the minimum wire interval W 2  is defined in layout  21  and wire  22  overlapped by region  26  is selected from among the wires in layout  21 . Region  26  has the minimum wire interval and, therefore, the selected wire  22  always has the same node. In the case wherein region  26  does not overlap any wires in layout  21 , region  26  is shifted by minimum wire interval W 2  so that region  26  does not overlap the previous position in layout  21  and, then, the next region is selected and it is determined whether or not the selected region overlaps the wire layer of layout  21 . The determination is repeated (Step  2 A) until the scanning of the entire surface of the layout is completed or the next wire of the same node is found.  
         [0105]     The area of the selected wire  22  of the same node is calculated (Step  2 B) Contact hole  24  that overlaps the calculated wire  22  of the same node is selected (Step  2 C). At this time, wire  22  that has contact hole  24  and wire  23  that has contact hole  25  are of different nodes ( FIG. 7D ). The number of contact holes  24  that has been selected in step  2 C is calculated (Step  2 D). In the case wherein the number of contact holes  24  that has been calculated in step  2 D is equal to, or greater than, the limitation value that has been determined in advance according to the area of wires  22  of the same node, the area is detected as an error portion where wire formation defects occur (Step  2 E).  
         [0106]     Next, wires that have been selected in step  2 A are eliminated from input layout  21  (Step  2 F). The wires of the same node that have once been selected in step  2 F are eliminated from input layout  21  and are not selected again and, therefore, a high speed CAD process can be implemented. It is determined whether or not region  26  selected in step  2 A has scanned the entire surface of input layout  21  (Step  2 G). In the case wherein region  26  that has not been scanned exists, the procedure returns to step  2 A and is repeated. The inspection is completed after scanning the entire surface.  
         [0107]      FIG. 5  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the second embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0108]     As shown in  FIG. 5 , minimum wire interval region  26  is selected in same node wire recognition step  2   a  and wire data  22  is selected and outputted as of the same node in the case wherein a region exists that overlaps wire data  22  of the inputted layout data  21 . The selected wire data  22  is inputted in same node area calculation step  2   b  so as to calculate area and the calculation value is outputted. Input layout data  21  and wire data  22  that has been outputted in same node wire recognition step  2   a  are inputted in contact recognition step  2   c  so that contact hole data  24  in input layout data  21  that overlaps wire data  22  is selected and outputted. The number of pieces of contact hole data  24  that has been outputted in contact recognition step  2   c  is calculated and outputted in contact number count step  2   d.    
         [0109]     The area of same node wire data  22  that has been outputted in area calculation step  2   b  and the number of pieces of contact hole data  24  that has been outputted in contact number count step  2   d  are inputted in error determination step  2   e  and wire data  22  and contact hole data  24  that have been selected as errors are outputted in the case wherein the number of contact holes relative to the area does not satisfy the condition. Layout data  21  and wire data  22  are inputted in layout data update step  2   f  wherein the layout data gained by subtracting selected wire data  22  from the wire layer of input layout data  21  is outputted so that this outputted data is used as the input layout data for wires that are inspected next.  
         [0110]     As a result of the above described procedure location where wire formation defects occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0111]     The third embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 8, 9 ,  10 A,  10 B,  10 C and  10 D.  
         [0112]      FIG. 9  is a flowchart showing the inspection algorithm according to the third embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 10A, 10B ,  10 C and  10 D are diagrams showing the inspection process according to the third embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described in accordance with the flowchart.  
         [0113]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in large area wires in a chip layout, wherein the number of contact holes in wires having a constant width is limited and the existence of defects is determined based on this number limitation and, thereby, wire formation defects are detected.  
         [0114]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 10A and 10B , wires  32  having wire width that are equal to, or greater than, wire width L wherein the possibility of the existence of wire formation defects is considered to be high in layout  31  are selected (Step  3 A). As shown in  FIGS. 10C and 10D , contact holes  33  that overlap wires  32  selected in step  3 A are selected (Step  3 B). The number of contact holes  33  that have been selected in step  3 B is calculated (Step  3 C). Error layout  34  is detected (Step  3 D) using the number limit (for example, four or greater) that has been set depending on wire width L.  
         [0115]      FIG. 8  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow data at the time of the inspection according to the third embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0116]     As shown in  FIG. 8 , wire width L that is considered to have a high possibility of wire formation defects is in advance defined in wire recognition step  3   a  and wire data  32  of wires having a width that is equal to, or greater than, wire width L is selected from among the inputted layout data  31  so that the selected data is outputted. Wire data  32  that has been outputted in wire recognition step  3   a  and input layout data  31  are inputted in contact recognition step  3   b  and contact hole data  33  that overlaps wire data  32  is selected from input layout data  31  so that the selected data is outputted. Contact hole data  33  that has been outputted in contact recognition step  3   b  is entered so that the number of contact holes is calculated and outputted in contact number counter step  3   c.    
         [0117]     The number of pieces of contact hole data  33  that has been outputted in contact number count step  3   c  is inputted so as to output error layout data  34  corresponding to the number limit (for example, four or greater) that has been set depending on wire width L in error determination step  3   d.    
         [0118]     As a result of the above described procedure, locations wherein wire formation defects occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0119]     The fourth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 11, 12 ,  13 A,  13 B,  13 C and  13 D.  
         [0120]      FIG. 12  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the fourth embodiment of this invention and  FIG. 13A, 13B ,  13 C and  13 D are diagrams showing the inspection process of the fourth embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described in accordance with the flowchart.  
         [0121]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in large area wires in a chip layout, wherein the total area of the contact holes in wires of a constant width is limited and existence of defects is determined based on this area limitation and, thereby, wire formation defects are detected.  
         [0122]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 13A and 13B , wires  42  having widths that are equal to, or greater than, wire width L 2  and having a high possibility of occurrence of wire formation defects are selected in advance (Step  4 A). As shown in  FIGS. 13C and 13D , contact holes  43  that overlap wires  42  selected in step  4 A are selected (Step  4 B). The areas of contact holes  43  selected in step  4 B are calculated (Step  4 C). Error layout  44  is detected using the area limitation that has been set depending on wire width L 2  (Step  4 D).  
         [0123]      FIG. 11  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of the inspection according to the fourth embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0124]     As shown in  FIG. 11 , wire width L 2  that is considered to have a high possibility of wire formation defects is in advance defined in wire recognition step  4   a  wherein wire data  42  of wires having wire widths that are equal to, or greater than, wire width L 2  is selected from the inputted layout data  41  so that the selected is outputted. Wire data  42  that has been outputted in wire recognition step  4   a  and input layout data  41  are inputted in contact recognition step  4   b  and contact hole data  43  that overlaps wire data  42  is selected from input layout data  41  so that the selected data is outputted. Contact hole data  43  that has been outputted in contact recognition step  4   b  is inputted so as to calculate and output the total area of the contact holes in contact area calculation step  4   c.    
         [0125]     The total area of contact holes  43  that have been outputted in contact area calculation step  4   c  is inputted and error layout data  44 , corresponding to the area limitation that is set depending on wire width L 2 , is outputted in error determination step  4   d.    
         [0126]     As a result of the above described procedure, locations wherein wire formation defects may occur in the input layout can be detected.  
         [0127]     The fifth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 14, 15 ,  16 A,  16 B,  16 C,  16 D and  16 E.  
         [0128]      FIG. 15  is a flowchart showing the inspection algorithm according to the fifth embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 16A, 16B ,  16 C,  16 D and  16 E are diagrams showing the inspection process according to the fifth embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0129]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in large area wires in the chip layout, comprising: the step of calculating the total area of wires of the same node and the total area of the contact hoes in the wires of the same node; and the step of determining the area limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node, wherein the area of the same node is detected as wire formation defects when the total area of the contact holes is equal to, or greater than, the area limitation value.  
         [0130]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 16A, 16B  and  16 C, a region  56  with four sides having minimum wire interval W 3  is defined in layout  51  and wire  52  overlapped by region  56  is selected from among the wires in layout  51 . The selected wire  52  always becomes of the same node because region  56  has the minimum wire interval. In the case wherein region  56  does not overlap any wires in layout  51 , region  56  is shifted by minimum wire interval W 3  so as not to overlap the previous position in the layout and it is determined whether the selected next region overlaps the wire layer in layout  51 . The determination is repeated until the entire surface of the layout has been scanned or until the next wire of the same node is discovered (Step  5 A).  
         [0131]     The area of the selected wire  52  of the same node is calculated (Step  5 B). Wire  52  having a contact hole  54  and wire  53  having a contact hole  55  are of different nodes ( FIG. 16D ). Contact hole  54  that overlaps wire  52  selected in step  5 A is selected (Step  5 C). The total area of contact hole  54  selected in step  5 C is calculated (Step  5 D). A contact area limitation value X (μm 2 ) in accordance with the range of wire area B (m 2 ) is uniquely determined from the area of wire  52  of the same node calculated in step  5 B using table  57  of  FIG. 16E . In the case wherein the determined limitation area X (μm 2 ) and the total area of contact hole  54  calculated in step  5 D are compared so as to find that the total area is equal to, or greater than, the limitation value X (μm 2 ), the area is detected as an error wherein a wire formation defect has occurred (Step  5 E).  
         [0132]     Next, the wires selected in step  5 A are deleted from input layout  51  (Step  5 F). The wires of the same node that have once been selected in step  5 F are deleted from input layout  51  so as not to be selected again and, therefore, a high speed CAD process can be implemented. It is determined whether or not region  56  selected in step  5 A has scanned the entire surface of input layout  51  (Step  5 G). In the case wherein there is a region  56  that has not been scanned, the procedure returns to step  5 A so that the same steps are repeated. The inspection is completed as soon as the entire surface is scanned.  
         [0133]      FIG. 14  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the fifth embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0134]     As shown in  FIG. 14 , minimum wire interval region  56  is defined in step  5   a  of recognizing wires of the same node and in the case wherein there is a region that overlaps wire data  52  of the inputted layout data  51  wire data  52  is selected and outputted as of the same node. Wire data  52  that has been recognized in step  5   a  of recognizing wires of the same node is inputted in step  5   b  of calculating wire areas so that the area is calculated and the result is outputted. The selected wire data  52  and layout data  51  are inputted in contact recognition step  5   c  so that contact hole data  54  within layout data  51  that overlaps wire data  52  is selected and outputted. The selected contact hole data  54  is inputted in step  5   d  of calculating contact areas so as to calculated the total area. The contact area limitation value X (μm 2 ) depending on wire area B (μm 2 ) of error condition table  57  that has been prescribed in advance by the occurrence ratio of wire defects and wire area B (μm 2 ) outputted in step  5   b  of calculating wire areas are inputted in step  5   e  of determining contact areas so that area limitation value X (μm 2 ) is uniquely determined.  
         [0135]     The limitation value X (μm 2 ) of the contact area outputted in contact area determination step  5   e  and the contact area calculated in contact area calculation step  5   d  are inputted in error determination step  5   f  and, thereby, wire data  52  and contact hole data  54  that have been selected as errors in the case wherein the area is X (μm 2 ) or greater are outputted. Layout data  51  and wire data  52  are inputted in layout data updating step  5   g  so as to output the layout data gained by subtracting selected wire data  52  from the wire layer of input layout data  51  is outputted and is used as input layout data of wires that are inspected next.  
         [0136]     According to the above described procedure portions where wire formation defects may occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0137]     The sixth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 17, 18 ,  19 A,  19 B,  19 C,  19 D and  19 E.  
         [0138]      FIG. 18  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm of the sixth embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 19A, 19B ,  19 C,  19 D and  19 E are diagrams showing the inspection process of the sixth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0139]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that occur in wires of a large area in a chip layout, which includes: the step of calculating the total area of wires of the same node and the number of contact holes in wires of the same node; and the step of determining the number limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the total area of the wires of the same node, wherein wire formation defects are detected when the number of the contact holes is equal to, or greater than, the number limitation value.  
         [0140]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 19A, 19B  and  19 C, a region  66  having four sides of the minimum wire interval W 4  is defined in layout  61  and wire  62  overlapped by region  66  is selected from among wires in layout  61 . Region  66  has the minimum wire interval and, therefore, selected wire  62  always becomes of the same node. In the case wherein region  66  does not overlap any wires in layout  61 , region  66  is shifted by minimum wire interval W 4  so as not to overlap the previous position within the layout and it is determined whether or not the next selected region overlaps the wire layer of layout  61 . The determination is repeated until the entire surface of the layout has been scanned or until the next wire of the same node is discovered (Step  6 A).  
         [0141]     The area of the selected wire  62  of the same node is calculated (Step  6 B). Wire  62  having contact hole  64  and wire  63  having contact hole  65  are of different nodes ( FIG. 19D ). Contact holes  64  that overlap wire  62  selected in step  6 A are selected (Step  6 C). The number of contact holes  64  selected in step  6 C is calculated (Step  6 D) The contact number limitation value C in accordance with wire area B (μm 2 ) is uniquely determined from the area of wire  62  of the same node calculated in step  6 B using table  67  of  FIG. 19E . The determined limitation number C and the number of contact holes  64  calculated in step  6 D are compared and in the case that the number is equal to, or greater than C, the area is detected as an error where wire formation defects may occur (Step  6 E).  
         [0142]     Next, the wires selected in step  6 A are deleted from the input layout (Step  6 F) The wires of the same node that have been once selected in step  6 F are deleted from the input layout so as not to be selected again and, therefore, a high speed CAD process can be implemented. It is determined whether or not region  66  selected in step  6 A has scanned the entire surface of the input layout (Step  6 G). In the case wherein there is a region  66  that has not been scanned, the procedure returns to step  6 A so that the steps are repeated. The inspection is completed when the entire surface is scanned.  
         [0143]      FIG. 17  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection of the sixth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the dataflow is described.  
         [0144]     As shown in  FIG. 17 , the minimum wire interval region  66  is defined in step  6   a  of recognizing wires of the same node and in the case wherein there is a region overlapped by wire data  62  of inputted layout data  61 , wire data  62  is selected and outputted as of the same node. The same node wire data  62  recognized in step  6   a  of recognizing wires of the same node is inputted in step  6   b  of calculating wire areas and the area is calculated and the result is outputted. The selected wire data  62  and layout data  61  are inputted in contact recognition step  6   c  so as to select and output contact hole data  64  within layout data  61  that overlaps wire data  62 . The contact hole data  64  selected in contact recognition step  6   c  is inputted in contact number counting step  6   d  so as to calculate the number. Error condition table  67  that has been prescribed in advance by occurrence ratio of wire defects and wire area B (μm 2 ) outputted in wire area calculation step  6   b  are inputted in contact number determination step  6   e  wherein the contact number limitation value C depending on wire area B (μm 2 ) is determined and outputted.  
         [0145]     The limitation value C of the contact number outputted in contact number determination step  6   e  and the contact number calculated in contact number counting step  6   d  are inputted in error determination step  6   f , wherein wire data  62  selected and contact hole data  64  are outputted as errors in the case that the number is equal to, or greater than C. Layout data  61  and wire data  62  are inputted in layout data update step  6   g  so that the layout data gained by subtracting selected wire data  62  from the wire layer of input layout data  61  is outputted and is used as input layout data of the next wire to be inspected.  
         [0146]     According to the above described procedure portions where wire formation defects will occur can be detected.  
         [0147]     The seventh embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 20, 21 ,  22 A,  22 B,  22 C,  22 D and  22 E.  
         [0148]      FIG. 21  is a flowchart showing the inspection algorithm according to the seventh embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 22A, 22B ,  22 C,  22 D and  22 E are diagrams showing the inspection process according to the seventh embodiment of this invention. In the following, the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0149]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a large area in a chip layout, which includes: the step of calculating the number of contact holes in wires of a constant width; and the step of determining the number limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the wire width, wherein the area is detected as a wire formation defect when the number of contact holes is equal to, or greater than, the number limitation value.  
         [0150]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 22A and 22B , a wire  72  having a width greater than wire width L 3 , which is considered to have a high possibility of wire formation defects in layout  71  is selected in advance (Step  7 A). Contact holes  73  that overlap wire  72  selected in step  7 A are selected (Step  7 B). The number of contact holes selected in step  7 B is calculated (Step  7 C). The number limitation value of contact holes  73  calculated in step  7 C is uniquely determined by the contact number limitation value C (for example, range of L 3 =W 1 →4 or more) depending on the range of wire width L 3  in table  77  of  FIG. 22E . As shown in  FIGS. 22C and 22D , the determined limitation number 4 and the number of contact holes  74  that has been calculated in step  7 C are compared and the area is detected as an error portion wherein a wire formation defect may occur in the case wherein the number is equal to, or greater than, the limitation number (4) (Step  7 D).  
         [0151]      FIG. 20  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the seventh embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0152]     As shown in  FIG. 20 , in wire recognition step  7   a , wire width L 3  that is considered to have a high possibility of a wire formation defect is defined in advance and wire data  72  having widths equal to, or greater than, wire width L 3  is selected from inputted layout data  71  so as to be outputted. Wire data  72  that has been outputted in wire recognition step  7   a  and input layout data  71  are inputted in contact recognition step  7   b  so that contact hole data  73  that overlaps wire data  72  is selected from input layout data  71  so as to be outputted. Contact hole data  73  outputted in contact recognition step  7   b  is inputted in contact number counting step  7   c  so that the number is calculated and outputted. Error condition table  77  that has been prescribed in advance by the occurrence ratio of wire defects and wire width L 3  (μm) outputted in wire recognition step  7   a  are inputted in contact number determination step  7   d  so that the contact number limitation value C depending on wire width L 3  (μm) is determined and outputted.  
         [0153]     The limitation value (for example, W 1 =4, or greater) of the contact number outputted in contact number determination step  7   d  and the number of contact hole data  73  calculated in contact number counting step  7   c  are inputted and are compared in error determination step  7   e  so that contact hole data  74  selected is outputted as errors in the case of 4 or greater.  
         [0154]     According to the above described procedure, portions wherein wire formation defects may occur in the input layout can be detected.  
         [0155]     The eighth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 23, 24 ,  25 A,  25 B,  25 C,  25 D and  25 E.  
         [0156]      FIG. 24  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the eighth embodiment of this invention and FIGS.  25 A,  25 B,  25 C,  25 D and  25 E are diagrams showing an inspection process according to the eighth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0157]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a large area in a chip layout, which includes: the step of calculating the total area of the contact holes in a wire of a constant width; and the step of determining the area limitation value of the contact holes in accordance with the wire width, wherein the area is detected as a wire formation defect when the total area of the contact holes is equal to, or greater than, the area limitation value.  
         [0158]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 25A and 25B , a wire  82  having a width equal to, or greater than wire width L 4 , which is considered to have a high possibility of a wire formation defect is in advance selected in layout  81  (Step  8 A). Contact holes  83  that overlap wire  82  selected in step  8 A is selected (Step  8 B). The total area of the contact holes selected in step  8 B is calculated (Step  8 C). The area limitation value of the contact holes calculated in step  8 C is uniquely determined by the contact area limitation value X (for example, range of W 1 →area of 1 μm 2 , or greater) that depends on the range of wire width L 4  in table  87  of  FIG. 25E . As shown in  FIGS. 25C and 25D , the determined limitation area X (μm 2 ) and the area of contact holes  84  calculated in step  8 C are compared so that the area is detected as an error portion where a wire formation defect may occur in the case wherein the area becomes X (μm 2 ) or greater (Step  8 D).  
         [0159]      FIG. 23  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the eighth embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0160]     As shown in  FIG. 23 , wire data  82  of wires of which the width is wire width L 4  or greater wherein the possibility of wire formation defects is considered to be had is in advance selected and outputted from layout data  81  in the wire recognition step  8   a . Wire data  82  outputted in wire recognition step  8   a  and input layout data  81  are inputted in contact recognition step  8   b  and contact hole data  83  that overlaps wire data  82  is selected and outputted from input layout data  81 . Contact hole data  83  outputted in contact recognition step  8   b  is inputted in contact area calculation step  8   c  so that the total area of contact hole data  83  is calculated and outputted. Error condition table  87  prescribed from the occurrence ratio of wire defects and wire width L 4  (μm) outputted in wire recognition step  8   a  are in advance inputted in contact area determination step  8   d  so that the total contact hole area X (μm 2 ) depending on wire width L 4  (μm) is uniquely determined and is outputted.  
         [0161]     The limitation value (for example, W 1 =1 μm 2  or greater) of the total contact area that have been outputted in contact area determination step  8   d  and the total contact hole area that have been calculated in contact area calculation step  8   c  are inputted and compared so that contact hole data  84  that has been selected as errors in the case wherein the area is 1 μm 2  or greater is outputted.  
         [0162]     According to the above described procedure, the portions where wire formation defects occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0163]     The ninth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 26, 27 ,  28 A,  28 B,  28 C,  28 D,  29 A,  29 B,  29 C,  29 D,  29 E,  30 A,  30 B,  30 C,  30 D,  30 E and  30 F.  
         [0164]      FIGS. 28A, 28B ,  28 C and  28 D are diagrams showing a region wherein the number of contact holes is collectively inspected according to the ninth embodiment of this invention. Region  96  shown by solid lines indicates the entire surface of the chip to be inspected. Regions  95  shown by dotted lines, respectively, have four sides with a predetermined inspection region width A and indicate inspection regions aligned in the longitudinal direction and in the lateral direction with equal intervals S. Symbols  91  to  94  indicate the shift conditions of the inspection regions.  FIGS. 29A, 29B ,  29 C,  29 D and  29 E show enlarged inspection regions of  FIGS. 28A, 28B ,  28 C and  28 D relative to wire layout  98 .  
         [0165]      FIG. 27  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the ninth embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0166]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting formation defects that will occur in wires of a large area in a chip layout, including the step of dividing the entire surface of the chip layout into a plurality of inspection regions; the step of limiting the number of contact holes in a wire of a constant width in the inspection regions; the step of inspecting wire formation defects by determining whether or not the area has a defect based on this number limitation; and the step of allowing the inspection regions to scan the entire surface of the chip layout.  
         [0167]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 29A, 29B ,  29 C,  29 D and  29 E, the total inspection region  95  is defined in input layout  98 , which is the inspection object. The inspection regions, respectively, have four sides with width A which are aligned in the longitudinal direction and in the lateral direction with equal intervals S (Step  9 A). In the following, the method for limiting the contact hole number utilizing the inspection regions is described.  
         [0168]     An inspection is carried out in inspection region  95  and when this inspection is completed inspection region  95  shifts within the layout to be inspected and an inspection of another region is again carried out. Inspection region  95  scans the entire surface and the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed. In the following one example where inspection region  95  shifts is cited and described.  
         [0169]     First, an inspection region is selected so as to be placed in the lower left of the entire surface of the layout (condition indicated by symbol  91  of  FIG. 29A ). When the inspection is completed in region  95 , inspection region  95  is then shifted by an interval that has in advance been determined by the data scale to be processed in the longitudinal direction  92  ( FIG. 29B ). The amount of shift of inspection region  95  and the size of one frame of inspection region  95  are varied depending on the data scale to be processed such that whether the entire inspection region is the entire surface of the chip or one block of the chip and, thereby, the inspection of the entire surface of the chip can be utilized in accordance with the purpose such that the process TAT is prioritized or a detailed inspection for a portion of the chip is prioritized. Such a shift in the longitudinal direction as indicated by symbol  92  is repeated until the inspection region has been shifted by S (interval of inspection region)+A (length of one side of the frame of the inspection region) from the initial position. Next, shifting is repeated until the inspection region has been shifted by S+A in the lateral direction as indicated by symbol  93  in the same manner as the above ( FIG. 29C ). Finally, shifting is repeated until the inspection region has been shifted in the diagonal direction indicated by symbol  94  in the same manner as the above ( FIG. 29D ). The inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed at the point of time when shifting is completed in the three directions (Step  9 B).  
         [0170]     Next, a region  99  is selected wherein inspection region  95  and wire  97  within layout  98  overlap. As shown in  FIGS. 30A and 30B , wire region  88  having wire width L 5  which is considered to have a high possibility of wire formation defects is in advance selected from among the wire regions resulting from step  9 C (Step  9 C). As shown in  FIG. 30C , a contact hole  89  that overlaps the wire selected in step  9 C is selected (Step  9 D). In the case wherein the contact hole selected at this time crosses inspection region  95  or in the case wherein the contact hole makes contact with the outside, the contact hole (symbol  107  shown in  FIG. 30F ) is not counted. The contact holes become count objects only in the case wherein the entirety thereof is included in inspection region  95  (symbol  106  shown in  FIG. 30F ). The number of selected contact holes  89  is calculated (Step  9 E). As shown in  FIG. 30D , the area is detected as an error portion  90  where wire formation defects will occur in the case wherein the number of contact holes  89  calculated in step  9 E is compared with the predetermined error conditions so that the number of contact holes is equal to be the limitation value, or greater (Step  9 F). Next, it is determined whether or not inspection region  95  has scanned the entire surface of the chip (Step  9 G). In the case wherein the inspection region has not scanned the entirety of the chip steps  9 B to  9 G are repeated. In the case wherein the inspection region has scanned the entirety of the chip, the inspection is completed.  
         [0171]      FIG. 26  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the ninth embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0172]     As shown in  FIG. 26 , layout data  98  is inputted in inspection region selection step  9   a  and correction inspection region data  95  in the layout to be inspected is defined so that wires that overlap layout data  98  are selected and outputted as specific region wire data  97 . In wire recognition step  9   b , wire data  88  having predetermined width L 5  is selected and outputted specific region wire data  97  outputted in inspection region selection step  9   a . Specific region wire data  97  outputted in inspection region selection step  9   a  and wire data  88  outputted in wire recognition step  9   b  are inputted in contact recognition step  9   c  and contact hole data  89  that overlaps wire data  88  is selected and is outputted from specific region wire data  97 .  
         [0173]     Contact hole data  89  outputted in contact recognition step  9   c  is inputted in contact number counting step  9   d  so that the number of contact holes is calculated. The number of contact holes outputted in contact number counting step  9   d  and predetermined error conditions are compared in error determination step  9   e  so as to output as an error contact hole data  90  selected in the case wherein the conditions are not satisfied.  
         [0174]     According to the above described procedure, the portions wherein wire formation defects occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0175]     The tenth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 31, 32 ,  33 A,  33 B,  33 C,  33 D and  33 E.  
         [0176]      FIG. 32  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm of the tenth embodiment of this invention and  FIGS. 33A, 33B ,  33 C,  33 D and  33 E are diagrams showing the inspection process according to the tenth embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0177]     According to this semiconductor device layout inspection method, the number of the contact holes in wires of a constant width is limited after wires of which the number of contact holes connected thereto is less than a constant number has in advance been removed from the chip layout in the third embodiment.  
         [0178]     In this case the minimum number (for example, three) of contact holes in a wire is defined as having a high possibility of defect occurrence. Next, as shown in  FIGS. 33A and 33B , wires  102  having contact holes of which the number is equal to, or greater than, that defined in input layout  101  are selected and, thereby, wires which is not required to be inspected are deleted so as to shorten the CAD process TAT (Step  10 A). As shown in  FIG. 33C , wires  103  having widths which are equal to, or greater than, predetermined wire width L 6  are solely selected from layout  102  that has been filtered in step  10 A (Step  10 B). As shown in  FIG. 33D , contact holes  104  that overlap wires  103  selected from layout  102  that has been filtered are selected (Step  10 C). As shown in  FIG. 33E , the number of the selected contact holes is calculated (Step  10 D) and the predetermined error conditions and the number of contact holes that has been calculated in step  10 D are compared so that (three or more) contact holes  105  which do not satisfy the conditions are outputted (Step  10 E).  
         [0179]      FIG. 31  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the tenth embodiment of this invention. In the following the dataflow is described.  
         [0180]     As shown in  FIG. 31 , layout data  101  is inputted in wire filtering step  10   a  and layout data  102  is outputted wherein the wires having no possibility of occurrence of wire formation defects are deleted due to the number of contact holes. Wire width L 6  that is considered to have a high possibility of wire formation defects is in advance defined in wire recognition step  10   b  and wire data  103  of wires having a width equal to, or greater than, wire width L 6  is selected and outputted from inputted layout data  102 . Wire data  103  outputted in wire recognition step  10   b  and layout data  102  are inputted in contact recognition step  10   c  and contact hole data  104  that overlaps wire data  103  is selected and outputted from layout data  102 .  
         [0181]     Contact hole data  104  outputted in contact recognition step  10   c  is inputted in contact number counting step  10   d  so that the number is calculated and outputted. The number of the contact holes of contact hole data  104  outputted in contact number counting step  10   d  is inputted in error determination step  10   e  and contact hole data  105  is outputted that becomes an error corresponding to the number limitation (for example, four or greater) that has been set depending on wire width L 6 .  
         [0182]     According to the above described procedure, the portions where wire formation defects may occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0183]     The eleventh embodiment of this invention is described in reference to  FIGS. 34, 35 ,  36 A,  36 B,  36 C,  36 D,  37 A,  37 B,  37 C,  37 D,  37 E,  38 A,  38 B,  38 C,  38 D,  39 A,  39 B,  39 C,  39 D and  39 E.  
         [0184]      FIGS. 36A, 36B ,  36 C and  36 D are diagrams showing a region wherein the number of contact holes is collectively inspected according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention. A region  116  indicated by solid lines represents the entire surface of the chip to be inspected. Regions  115  indicated by dotted lines respectively have four sides of a predetermined inspection region width A 2  and represent the inspection regions aligned in the longitudinal direction and in the lateral direction with equal intervals S 2 . Symbols  111  to  114  show the shift conditions of the inspection region.  FIGS. 37A, 37B ,  37 C,  37 D and  37 E show enlarged inspection regions of  FIGS. 36A, 36B ,  36 C and  36 D relative to wire layout  118 .  
         [0185]      FIG. 35  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention. In the following the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0186]     According to this semiconductor device layout inspection method, the inspection regions are limited to the inspection regions having contact holes of which the number is equal to, or greater than, a constant number from among a plurality of inspection regions and the number of contact holes is limited in wires having a constant width in the ninth embodiment.  
         [0187]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 37A, 37B ,  37 C,  37 D and  37 E, total inspection region  115  is defined in input layout  118 , which is an inspection object. The inspection regions respectively have four sides of width A 2  and are aligned in the longitudinal direction and in the lateral direction with equal intervals S 2  (Step  11 A). In the following the contact hole limitation method using the inspection regions is described.  
         [0188]     An inspection is carried out in inspection region  115  and when the inspection is completed inspection region  115  is shifted within the layout to be inspected so that another region is inspected. When inspection region  115  scanned the entire surface the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed. In the following an example wherein inspection region  115  shifts is cited and explained.  
         [0189]     First, an inspection region is selected so that the region lines up with the lower left of the entire surface of the layout (condition of symbol  111  in  FIG. 37A ). When the inspection of inspection of section  115  integrated circuit completed, inspection region  115  is then shifted by a predetermined interval in the longitudinal direction  112  ( FIG. 37B ). The amount of shift inspection region  115  and the size of one frame of inspection region  115  are varied according to the data scale to be processed such that whether the entire inspection region is the entire surface of the chip or one block and thereby, an inspection can be used according to a purpose such that the inspection of the entire surface of the chip is carried out by prioritizing the process TAT and an inspection for a portion of the chip carried out by prioritizing the detail of the inspection. The shift in the longitudinal direction indicated by symbol  112  is repeated until the region is shifted by S 2  (interval between inspection regions)+A 2  (length of one side of the frame of an inspection region) from the original position. Next, the shift is repeated in the lateral direction as indicated by symbol  113  in the same manner, as the above until the inspection region is shifted by S 2 +A 2  ( FIG. 37C ). Finally, the shift is repeated in a diagonally direction as indicated by symbol  114  in the same manner as the above until the inspection region is shifted ( FIG. 37D ). The inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed at the point in time when the shifts in the three directions are completed (Step  11 B).  
         [0190]     Region  115  selected in step  11 B is filtered using the number of contact holes. It is not necessary to inspect the regions having two or less contact holes in the case wherein a wire formation defect occurs when the number of contact holes is at least three irrelevant of the area and the width of the wires and therefore, an inspection region  120  wherein three or more contact holes exist is selected from inspection region  115  that has been selected in step  11 B as shown in  FIGS. 38A, 38B ,  38 C and  38 D (Step  11 C) and thereby the inspection process TAT can be shortened.  
         [0191]     Next a region  119  wherein the filtered inspection region  120  and wire  117  within layout  118  overlap is selected (Step  1 C). As shown in  FIGS. 39A and 39B , a wire region  122  having a width that is equal to or greater than a predetermined width W is selected from among the wire region resulting from step  11 C (Step  1 D). As shown in  FIG. 39C , a contact hole  123  that overlaps the wire selected in step  11 D is selected (Step  11 E). The number of the selected contacted holes  123  is calculated (Step  11 F). The number of contact holes  123  that has been calculated in step  11 F is compared with predetermined error conditions and the area is detected as an error portion where a wire formation defect may occur in the case wherein the number is equal to or greater than the limitation value (symbol  124  of  FIG. 39D ) (Step  11 G). Next, it is determined whether or not inspection region  115  has scanned the entire surface of the chip (Step  11 H). Steps  11 B to  11 G are repeated in the case wherein the entirety has not been scanned. The inspection is completed in the case wherein the entirety has been scanned.  
         [0192]      FIG. 34  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the eleventh embodiment of this invention. In the following, the dataflow is described.  
         [0193]     As show in  FIG. 34 , layout data  118  is inputted in inspection region selecting step  11   a  and total inspection region data  115  is selected and outputted. Inspection region data  115  and layout data  118  are inputted in inspection region filtering step  11   b  and a portion wherein inspection region  120  having three or more contact holes and wire  117  overlap is outputted as specific region wire data  119  from inspection region data  115 . Wire data  122  of wires having a predetermined width W is selected and outputted from specific region wire data  119  that is outputted from inspection region filtering step  11   b  in wire recognition step  11   c . Specific region wire data  119  outputted in inspection region filtering step  11   b  and wire data  122  outputted in wire recognition step  11   c  are inputted in contact recognition step  11   d  and contact hole data  123  that overlaps specific inspection wire data  119  is selected and outputted from specific inspection wire data  119 .  
         [0194]     Contact hole data  123  outputted in contact recognition step  11   d  is inputted in contact number counting step  11   e  so that the number of contact holes is calculated. The number of contact holes outputted in contact number counting step  11   e  is compared with predetermined error conditions in error determination step  11   f  so that contact hole data  124  selected is outputted as an error in the case wherein the conditions are not satisfied.  
         [0195]     According to the above described procedure, portions where wire formation defects will occur can be detected in the input layout.  
         [0196]     The twelfth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 40, 41 ,  42 A,  42 B,  42 C,  42 D,  43 A,  43 B,  43 C and  43 D.  
         [0197]      FIGS. 42A, 42B ,  42 C, and  42 D are diagrams showing an area where the number of contact holes is collectively inspected according to the twelfth embodiment of this invention. Region  136  indicated by solid lines represents the entire surface of the chip to be inspected. Regions  135  indicated by dotted lines have four sides respectively of a predetermined inspection region width A 3  and represent inspection regions aligned in the longitudinal direction and the lateral direction with equal intervals S 3 . Symbols  131  to  134  show the shift conditions of the inspection regions.  FIGS. 43A, 43B ,  43 C and  43 D show enlarged inspection regions of  FIGS. 42A, 42B ,  42 C and  42 D relative to wire layout  138 .  
         [0198]      FIG. 41  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the twelfth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0199]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting the occurrence of formation defects in wires of a large area in the chip layout that includes the step of dividing the entire surface of the chip layout into a plurality of inspection regions; the step of limiting the area ratio of the total area of wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node by using an antenna check in the inspection regions and of detecting wire formation detects by determining whether or not defects exist based on this limitation; and the step of allowing the inspection region to scan the entire surface of the chip layout.  
         [0200]     The above described antenna check is a technology of inspection by determining a threshold value based on the ratio of gates to the wires (vias, wires) in order to prevent the breakdown of a gate of a transistor due to a charge that occurs in the plasma etching step at the time of manufacturing a semiconductor device.  
         [0201]     In this case, a shown in  FIGS. 43A, 43B ,  43 C and  43 D, total inspection region  135  is defined in input layout  138  which is an inspection object. The inspection regions have four sides of width A 3  respectively and are aligned in the longitude direction and in the lateral direction with equal intervals S 3  (Step  13 A). In the following, the method for limiting the area ratio of the total area of the same node to the total area of the contact holes using inspection region  135  is described.  
         [0202]     An inspection is carried out in inspection  135  and when the inspection is finished, inspection region  135  shifts within the layout to be inspected so that another inspection of a different region is carried out. When inspection region  135  scans the entire surface, the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed. In the following, an example wherein inspection region  135  is shifted is cited and described.  
         [0203]     First, an inspection region is selected so that the selected region is lined up with the lower left of the entire surface of the layout (condition of symbol  131  in  FIG. 42A ). When an inspection is completed in an inspection region  135 , inspection region  135  is then shifted by a predetermined interval in longitudinal direction  132  ( FIG. 42B ). The shift in the longitudinal direction indicated by symbol  132  is repeated until the region is shifted by S 3  (interval of inspection regions)+A 3  (length of one side of the frames of inspection regions) from the initial position. Next, the shift in the lateral direction indicated by symbol  133  is repeated in the same manner as the above until the inspection region is shifted by S 3 +A 3  ( FIG. 42C ). Finally, the shift in the diagonal direction indicated by symbol  134  is repeated in the same manner as the above until the inspection region is shifted ( FIG. 42D ). The inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed at the point in time when the shifts in the three directions are completed (Step  13 B).  
         [0204]     Next, a wire  139  wherein inspection region  135  and wire  137  within layout  138  overlap is selected (Step  13 C). Contact hole  140  wherein inspection region  135  and a contact hole within layout  138  overlap is selected (Step  13 D). Wire  139  and contact hole  140  selected in step  13 C and step  13 D are used for an antenna check so that the ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node is calculated (Step  13 E). Though the ratio of the gate to the contact connected to the gate is calculated according to a conventional antenna check, it is possible to find a ratio of a wire to a contact hole connected to the wire by using wire  139  instead of the gate. The total area ratio calculated in step  13 E is compared with predetermined error conditions and is equal to be the limitation value or greater the area is detected as an error portion where a wire formation defect will occur (Step  13 F). Next, it is determined whether or not inspection region  135  has scanned the entire surface of the layout (Step  13 G). In the case wherein the entirety has not been scanned, steps  13 B to  13 G are repeated. In the case wherein the entirety has been scanned the inspection has been completed.  
         [0205]      FIG. 40  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the twelfth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the dataflow is described.  
         [0206]     As show in  FIG. 40 , layout data  138  is inputted in inspection region selecting step  13   a  so that total inspection region data  135  is selected and outputted. Inspection region data  135  and layout data  138  are inputted in wire recognition step  13   b  and wire data  139  that overlaps inspection region data  135  is selected from layout data  138 . Inspection region data  135  and layout data  138  are inputted in contact recognition step  13   c  and contact hole data  140  that overlaps inspection region  135  is selected from the layout data. Wire data  139  selected in wire recognition step  13   b  and contact hole data  140  selected in contact recognition step  13   c  are inputted in area ratio calculating step  13   d  so that wire data  139  is used in place of the gate and an antenna check is carried out.  
         [0207]     The area ratio outputted in area ratio calculating step  13   d  is compared with predetermined error conditions in error determination step  13   e  and wire data  139  and contact hole data  140  selected are outputted as errors in the case wherein the conditions are not satisfied.  
         [0208]     According to the above described procedure portions where wire formation defects may occur can be detected from the input layout.  
         [0209]     The thirteenth embodiment of this invention is described below in reference to  FIGS. 44, 45 ,  46 A,  46 B,  46 C and  46 D.  
         [0210]      FIG. 45  is a flowchart showing an inspection algorithm according to the thirteenth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the inspection procedure is described according to the flowchart.  
         [0211]     This semiconductor device layout inspection method is a method for inspecting the occurrence of formation defects in wires of a large area in a chip layout that includes the step of defining a partial inspection region in a chip layout; the step of limiting the area ratio of the total area of wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node by using an antenna check in the partial inspection region; the step of detecting wire formation defects by determining whether or not defects exists based on this limitation; and the step of allowing the partial inspection region to scan the entire surface of the chip layout by using a density check.  
         [0212]     The above described density check is the technology of inspection wherein a threshold value of a constant area ratio is determined in a single layer layout in order to increase the flatness and the etching precision in CMP (chemical mechanical polishing) at the time of manufacturing a semiconductor device.  
         [0213]     In this case, as shown in  FIGS. 46A, 46B ,  46 C and  46 D, a method is described wherein an area ratio calculation is carried out in partial inspection region  143  defined as having a size A 4  in input layout  142 , which is an inspection object, so that partial inspection region  143  scans the entire surface of layout  142  in shift step S 4  (&lt;A 4 ) and, thereby, the total area ratio of the wires of the same node to the contact holes connected to the wires is limited.  
         [0214]     An inspection is carried out in partial region  143  and the inspection is completed partial inspection region  143  shifts within the layout to be inspected so that another inspection is carried out in a different region. When partial inspection region  143  scans the entire surface the inspection of the entire surface of the layout is completed (Step  14 A). A wire  145  where partial inspection region  143  and wire  141  within layout  142  overlap is selected (Step  14 B) a contact hole  146  wherein partial inspection region  143  and a contact hole within layout  142  overlap is selected (Step  14 C). Wire  145  and contact hole  146  selected in step  14 B and step  14 C are used for an antenna check so that the ratio of the total area of the wires of the same node to the total area of the contact holes in the wires of the same node is calculated (Step  14 B). Though the ratio of gates and contacts connected to the gates is calculated in a conventional antenna check, it is possible to find a ratio of wires to contact holes contacted to the wires by using wire  145  instead of the gate. In the case wherein, the total area ratio calculated in step  14 D is compared with predetermined error conditions so as to be found to be the limitation value or greater, the area is detected as an error portion wherein a wire formation defect will occur (Step  14 E). Next, it is determined whether or not partial inspection region  143  has scanned the entire surface of the layout (Step  14 F). In the case wherein the entirety has not been scanned, steps  14 A to  14 E are repeated. In the case wherein the entirety has been scanned, the inspection is completed.  
         [0215]      FIG. 44  is a dataflow diagram showing a flow of data at the time of inspection according to the thirteenth embodiment of this invention. In the following, the dataflow is described.  
         [0216]     As shown in  FIG. 44 , layout data  142  is inputted in partial inspection region selecting step  14   a  so that partial inspection region data  143  is selected and outputted. Partial inspection region data  143  and layout data  142  are inputted in wire recognition step  14   b  and wire data  145  that overlaps partial inspection region data  143  is selected from layout data  142 . Partial region inspection data  143  and layout  142  are inputted in contact recognition step  14   c  and contact hole data  146  that overlaps partial inspection region data  143  is selected from layout data  142 . Wire  145  selected in wire recognition step  14   b  and contact hole data  146  selected in contact recognition step  14   c  are inputted in area ratio calculation step  14   d  so that wire data  145  instead of the gate is used and an antenna check is carried out.  
         [0217]     The area ratio outputted in area ratio calculating step  14   d  is compared with predetermined error conditions in error determination step  14   e  so that wire data  145  and contact hold data  146  selected are outputted as errors in the case wherein the conditions are not satisfied.  
         [0218]     According to the above described procedure, portions where wire formation defects will occur can be detected in the input layout.