Abstract:
Method and Apparatus to Perform Reactive Jamming While Simultaneously Avoiding Friendly Pseudo-Random Frequency Hopping Communications is disclosed. The system provides an enhancement to surgical reactive jammers that combines near-real-time jamming capability with the additional feature of allowing tactical communications. The jammer includes a synchronization subsystem that synchronizes jammer lockout frequencies with those frequencies being hopped to by units that are members of a friendly communications network. The synchronization subsystem is coordinated with, and therefore tied to the time-synchronized cryptography of the friendly communications net. As a result, the jammer will be aware, on a real-time basis, which frequency the friendly communications network will next be hopping to. The jammer&#39;s awareness of these future frequencies will allow those frequencies to be “locked out” of the jammer&#39;s transmission band dynamically.

Description:
[0001]     This application is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 11/480,706, filed Jul. 3, 2006, and Ser. No. 10/912,976, filed Aug. 6, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,126,979. The below-identified Provisional Application was copending with application Ser. No. 10/912,976.  
         [0002]     This application is filed within one year of, and claims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/765,824, filed Feb. 7, 2006. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0003]     1. Field of the Invention  
         [0004]     This invention relates generally to electronic warfare and communications systems and, more specifically, to a Method and Apparatus to Perform Reactive Jamming While Simultaneously Avoiding Friendly Pseudo-Random Frequency Hopping Communications.  
         [0005]     2. Description of Related Art  
         [0006]     This provisional patent application relates to an enhanced electronic warfare reactive jammer capability to deny enemy communications while simultaneously avoiding (i.e. not jamming) friendly pseudo-random frequency hopping communications that are operating in the same vicinity.  
         [0007]     It is worthy to note that this patent application is marginally similar, to a another patent application Ser. No. 11/480,706, entitled “Method and Apparatus to Perform Surgical Reactive Jamming While Maintaining Simultaneous Tactical Communications”, also filed by this author. But that previous filing has sharp differences and distinctions from this present filing. The previous filing was for a reactive jammer that could itself also act as a secure communications device. The present filing is for a reactive jammer that can operate alongside separate 3rd party co-located military grade communications radios. The invention described herein outlines a unique technique to protect the pseudo-random frequency hopping signals of friendly 3rd party radios, which normally would have been jammed by a fast reactive jammer.  
         [0008]     This capability is essential for mobile reactive jammer units in the field. Such field units typically need to maintain their own secure voice communications (“comms”) with other mobile units, or higher eschelon commands, for tactical orders, safety considerations, and battlefield coordination. The problem today for present day units is that while performing their respective jamming missions, it precludes them from using their own tactical communications links due to the fact that the very nature of the reactive jammer will prevent their own tactical comms equipment to make a connection. Thus the operating personnel must make a choice between using one or the other at any given time.  
         [0009]     The invention described in this provisional patent application solves that issue and provides a unique capability to perform both surgical reactive jamming while simultaneously allowing tactical communications to proceed from separate 3rd party military radios. This invention is therefore vital to the interests of United States national security as it provides a valuable Electronic Warfare capability, as it greatly reduces electronic fratricide of our own communications nets.  
         [0010]     The jammer device described by patent application Ser. No. 10/912,976 is sometimes referred to in the Electronic Warfare industry as a “wideband reactive jammer”, “surgical follower jammer,” or a “surgical reactive jammer” because it has the ability to quickly find enemy signals and then apply energy exactly on target so as to jam those enemy communication signals. This has greatest application against modem military radios that are known as “frequency hoppers”. Unfortunately, the very same radio technologies are used for friendly communications. So this invention describes how to jam enemy pseudo-random frequency hopping signals, while simultaneously ignoring the friendly pseudo-random frequency hopping signals (from 3rd party radios).  
         [0011]     What is needed therefore in order to feasibly detect and jam modern fast transmissions while at the same time maintain tactical communications with friendly 3rd party pseudo-random frequency hopping radios is a system that not only has: 1) The abilities stated in the aforementioned previous patent application Ser. No. 10/912,976, but also 2) The ability to accept and process the same frequency hopping program data of the 3rd party radios in question, and also 3) The ability to be precisely synchronized with all other friendly 3rd party radios in the field in both timing and communications hop sets, and finally 4) The ability to have a floating lockout (i.e. selectively not jam) all the frequency hopping signals from the friendly 3rd party radios.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0012]     In light of the aforementioned problems associated with the prior systems and method, it is an object of the present invention to provide a Method and Apparatus to Perform Reactive Jamming While Simultaneously Avoiding Friendly Pseudo-Random Frequency Hopping Communications. It is an object that the system provide an enhancement to surgical reactive jammers that combines near-real-time jamming capability with the additional feature of allowing friendly tactical communications. The jammer should include a system that synchronizes jammer lockout frequencies with those frequencies being hopped to by units that are members of a friendly communications network. The synchronization system should be coordinated with the time-synchronized cryptography of the friendly communications net. The jammer should, therefore, be aware, on a real-time basis, which frequency the friendly communications network will next be hopping to. The jammer&#39;s awareness of these future frequencies will allow those frequencies to be “locked out” of the jammer&#39;s transmission band dynamically.  
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0013]     The objects and features of the present invention, which are believed to be novel, are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The present invention, both as to its organization and manner of operation, together with further objects and advantages, may best be understood by reference to the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, of which:  
         [0014]      FIG. 1  is a depiction of the Surgical Reactive Jammer System of application Ser. No. 10/912,976; and  
         [0015]      FIG. 2  is a depiction of the System of  FIG. 1  further including the Synchronization Subsystem of the present invention.  
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS  
       [0016]     The following description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention and sets forth the best modes contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Various modifications, however, will remain readily apparent to those skilled in the art, since the generic principles of the present invention have been defined herein specifically to provide a Method and Apparatus to Perform Reactive Jamming While Simultaneously Avoiding Friendly Pseudo-Random Frequency Hopping Communications.  
         [0017]     The discussion of the present invention will first commence by review of  FIG. 1 ,  FIG. 1  shows the system diagram of a prior art surgical reactive jammer as described by patent application Ser. No. 10/912,976. As mentioned, the present invention is an extension and an augmentation to a previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/912,976: “System and Method to Autonomously and Selectively Jam Frequency Hopping Signals in Near Real-Time.” The disclosure of this parent application will be referenced continually throughout the instant description, and is therefore incorporated herein by reference.  
         [0018]     This jammer uses a device that has a wideband front-end which can digitally processes the entire intermediate frequency (IF) output at once. Thus all the signal information contained within the bandwidth of the IF filter can be analyzed instantly. The resulting IF output may contain one or many short duration communication signals.  
         [0019]     The next section contains the selection logic by which it is automatically determined whether or not the received signal should be jammed. The cycle generator section regulates the user configurable System timing. The final section of the surgical reactive jammer executes the jamming frequency generation and output, which must also occur extremely quickly. All of these processes occur in near real time.  
         [0020]     The Wideband Downconverter, A/D Converter, FFT, Lockouts, Peak Detection Algorithm, and Signal Evaluation Logic sections of the prior art jammer design are not changed in the present invention. Thus for simplicity in drawing the following  FIG. 2 , those module sections are grouped together and labeled “Jammer Block”.  
         [0021]      FIG. 2  outlines a flow block diagram of the invention. An RF splitter is used to split the incoming signals into two fully independent processing paths (identified in application Ser. No. 11/480,706 as  400 A and  400 B). As an alternative embodiment of the invention, separate antennas could also be used. The first path is through the Jammer Block which performs all the surgical reactive jamming functions. In this path, the signals go through the normal processing to determine whether or not various detected signals should be jammed.  
         [0022]     The second path is independent and uses it&#39;s own narrowband tuner to specifically pick up the synchronization channels (or over-the-air programming commands) of the 3rd party radios. These sync channels typically are used to broadcast timing information to the rest of the radio net from the master radio, so that all slave radios will be aligned with the clock of the master. The sync information is then fed to a processor and the results are fed into an internal clock module. This internal clock is disciplined by a GPS Time Receiver. The synchronized time is then fed to a conventional pseudo-random number generator which, when programmed with the same “hop-set” and “seed” values, will send out a pseudo-random number which corresponds to a specific bin number whereby the invention will know not to jam any information appearing on that particular bin frequency. The method of using FFT bins is unique and is the heart of the efficiency of this approach and invention. All of these functions above are described in more detail in the following Operation section of this patent application.  
       DIAGRAM REFERENCE NUMERALS  
       [0000]    
       
         
           
               10  PIN Diode Attenuator Switch  
               12  Wideband Downconverter and Filters  
               14  Analog-to-Digital Converter (A/D)  
               16  Fast Fourier Transformations (FFT&#39;s)  
               18  Lockout Logic  
               20  Peak Detection Algorithm  
               22  Signal Evaluation Algorithm  
               24  Memory and Priority Select Logic  
               26  Direct Digital Synthesizer (DDS) Signal Generators  
               28  Upconverter Oscillator  
               30  Cycle Generator  
               32  Mixer  
               34  High Power Amplifier (PA) and Output Filter  
               100  RF Splitter  
               102  Narrowband Tuner  
               104  Analog IF Signals  
               106  Sync Pulse Processor  
               108  Time Correction Data  
               110  GPS Time Receiver  
               112  Time Data  
               114  Internal Clock  
               116  Synchronized Time Data with Master Radio  
               118  PRNG Seed  
               120  Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)  
               122  Pseudo-Random Number Output  
               124  Bin Hop Set Table Load  
               126  Bin Hop Set Lookup Table  
               128  Set Floating Lockout Frequency Bin Command  
               200  Jammer Block  
               300  Invention 
 
 Operation 
 
           
         
       
     
         [0053]     The operation of the invention  300  is described here in this section. It is assumed that the reader is already familiar with how the reactive jammer technology works (minus the enhancement of this invention) by reading the aforementioned patent application Ser. No. 10/912,976. Most of the details regarding that prior art will not be discussed here. Rather the discussion in this document will focus on the invention  300  at hand which is an augmentation to the prior art system. As before, a wideband digital reception technique of the reactive jammer is used to instantaneously detect the presence of enemy signal energy within large bands of RF spectrum. Detection of signals occur on cyclical “look-through&#39;s” which are short time periods whereby the jammer does not radiate so as to allow the wideband front end tuner to have the sensitivity to pick up any newly occurring signals. Once this period is complete the jammer will emit energy once more until the next look-through period. This “attack cycle” repeats itself indefinitely during jamming operations. This element of the prior art is the same as the invention  300 . The difference arises out of additional circuitry and software that synchronizes with the 3rd party frequency hopping radios and then feeds specific information back into the jammer decision tree which alters the (transmission) firing solution.  
         [0054]     To begin with, a short discussion on the nature of military frequency hopping radios is required. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with how standard military grade frequency hopping radios work and are utilized in a network. But to summarize, most frequency hopping radios require several data elements in order to operate. The minimum requirements are the values of a frequency hop set and a pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) Seed value. Some radios, for example, also have additional data elements such as transmission keys and net ID values. This patent will focus on the generic version of a military grade frequency hopping radio. Continuing forward, the hop set and PRNG Seed tell the radios in a net when and where the next frequency setting to send information will be. All data is broken up into small chunks and sent over these pseudo-randomly distributed frequencies at definable times. This principle is leveraged in this patent application as the invention  300  will become another “node” in the 3rd party communications net. It will be a slave to the master radio which coordinates the timing of the frequency hops. In that way, the invention  300  will “know” what the next hop is at all moments in time. In so doing, it will calculate the corresponding frequency bin number and use that bin number and a user settable number of adjacent bin numbers as a lockout into the decision tree chain of the jammer. Thus, a “floating lockout” will be established which will protect the 3rd party communications net frequency hops at all times. This is the general principle of operation of the invention  300 .  
         [0055]     Continuing forward with the invention  300  description, signals come in through the receive antenna and are passed through the PIN attenuator switch  10 . This switch is only connected when a look-through or talk-through period is active. The incoming signals are split equally by an RF splitter  100 .  
         [0056]     One path of the incoming signals leads to jammer block  200 , which contains the sub-modules shown in  FIG. 1 . As mentioned, the processing of this path is identical to that of the previous patent application for the reactive jammer. Since there are no changes to the jamming functionality, the processing details will not be covered again in this document.  
         [0057]     The second path of the incoming signals leads to new additional hardware modules of this invention  300 . The signal proceeds to a narrowband tuner  102  which has the function of listening for the synchronization/programming channels of the radio net. Once detected, it will downconvert the signals to an intermediate frequency for further processing. The resulting analog IF signal  104  is then fed to circuitry which processes the synchronization pulses  106  and creates a time correction. The time correction data  108  is then fed to an internal clock  114 .  
         [0058]     The internal clock  114  is a standard counter which is used to maintain the system&#39;s precise time. Since frequency hopping radios in use today coordinate their information transfer according to specific times, this circuitry plays a pivotal role in synchronizing the invention  300  with the rest of the 3rd party communications net. A GPS time receiver  110  is used to maintain fidelity and to discipline the internal clock. The time corrections  108  and the time values  112  both feed into the internal clock  114  and the outputs are time values  116  that are synchronized with the master radio in the net.  
         [0059]     The synchronized time with the master  116  is then fed to the PRNG  120 . This PRNG is the exact same algorithm as the one that is used in the 3rd party radios. For the invention  300  to work, there are three things that must be same with the 3rd party radios in question. The first is that the PRNG  120  needs to be identical between both devices. The second is that both the invention  300  and the 3rd party radios need to be programmed with the same PRNG Seed  118 . And thirdly, the same hop set that is used in the radios must be also input into the invention  300 . Thus, with the synchronized timing information  116  and the same PRNG Seed  118  when input into the PRNF  120  will be the same pseudo-random number  122 .  
         [0060]     The final step is for the pseudo-random number  122  to be fed into the bin hop set lookup table  126 . Initially, the hop set of the radios must be translated into a bin hop set load  124 . This can be done either offline or automatically by the invention  300 . The bin hop set load  124  is a frequency bin representation of the analog frequency hop set of the radios. In the radio, the pseudo-random number  122  identifies the exact frequency setting for the radio to tune to in order to hear the next transmission hop. In the invention  300 , the pseudo-random number  122  identifies the corresponding bin number where the hop frequency would be. The result is the setting of a lockout on that particular bin  128 . The optimum way for the jammer to digitally process this information fast enough is by operating by digital bin number values and not by analog frequency values. This approach and technique is unique and is the optimal way to perform the automated lockout process in the reactive jammer system.  
         [0061]     As the reader can see, the same frequency hopping pattern that is used for the transmission of tactical communications with the 3rd party radios is also used as a “floating lockout” situation in the invention  300 . Once the invention  300  is synchronized with the friendly frequency hopping radios, it will “be aware” of the next hop frequency in the net. It will then pass along that exact frequency hop bin number to the invention&#39;s lockout circuitry  18  inside the jammer block  200  where the hop bin will be temporary programmed into the protected frequencies table for a period of time until the next hop occurs. So when the radio net moves to the next hop, the invention  300  will be aware of that and will mark the next hop bin accordingly as a protected frequency and release the former bin. This creates a “floating lockout” bin situation.  
         [0062]     In conclusion, this invention  300  is only able to process all reactive jamming fast enough by using FFT bin numbers (as described in the previous patent application that this patent application builds upon). The virtue of the system is that it is fast enough to handle frequency hopping radios. This invention now deals with the real world issue of jamming friendly frequency hopper radios.  
         [0063]     The requirements for such compatibility are that the radios and the invention have the same PRNG, have the same PRNG Seed value, and have the same hop set data. Typically in real world systems, the PRNG Seed value and the hop set data are encapsulated in one single data load. This invention is flexible enough to handle all such data loading protocols. An alternate embodiment of the invention is to be able to load the critical information on the fly, over the air. This can be done by utilizing the narrowband tuner  102  to detect the wireless commands and process them accordingly. In some radio systems, this process is known as the Electronic Remote Fill feature. Through the unique methods and techniques presented here, this invention will allow jamming missions to continue while simultaneously allowing friendly 3rd party tactical communications radios to not be jammed. This will lead to significantly less electronic fratricide in the field and offer the unique ability to jam while maintaining tactical comms  
         [0064]     Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the just-described preferred embodiment can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.