Abstract:
A method of maintaining routing tables at nodes of an overlay network, where a routing table of a given node contains, for each of a set of neighboring successor and predecessor nodes, a mapping between an overlay network address of the node and a physical locator of the node. The method comprises, upon or immediately prior to departure of a node from the overlay network, sending a Leave request from the departing node (or one of the neighboring nodes of the departing node aware of the departure) to each neighboring node (or each other neighboring node of the departing node), indicating the departure and containing one or more mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. Each neighboring node (or each other neighboring node) receives the Leave request and uses said mapping(s) to update its routing table.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a 35 U.S.C. §371 national stage application of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2008/056376, filed on 23 May 2008, the disclosure and content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The above-referenced PCT International Application was published in the English language as International Publication No. WO 2009/141013 A1 on Nov. 26, 2009. 
     TECHNICAL FIELD 
     The present invention relates to a mechanism for maintaining distributed hash tables in an overlay network. The invention is applicable in particular to an optimised procedure for handling the leaving of a node from an overlay network 
     BACKGROUND 
     Peer-to-peer or P2P networks make use of the pooled resources of participating nodes including processing capabilities and communication bandwidth to facilitate a wide variety of services including file sharing and VoIP telephony. In the absence of central servers, particular P2P services may make use of “overlay networks” to optimise resource location. An overlay network comprises nodes connected by virtual links representing paths extending across possibly many physical links in the underlying network (e.g. the Internet). Each node in the overlay network maintains a routing table containing a set of links to certain other nodes within the overlay network. Resource requests are passed between nodes until they arrive at a node which is responsible for that resource. 
     Distributed Hash Tables (DHT) provide an efficient means for mapping resource names (“keys”) to locations within an overlay network. DHT makes use of a hashing algorithm to map keys, e.g. song titles, SIP URIs, etc, to a finite value space, e.g. 128 bits. The hashing algorithm is chosen to ensure a relatively uniform spread of hash values across the value space. Thus, for example, the hashing of 100 song titles will likely result in 100 hash values that are relatively evenly spaced across the value space. Nodes within an overlay network are identified by usernames, which are themselves hashed into respective hash values. Each node then becomes responsible for a set of hash values within the value space which neighbour its own value. In practice, a node will store locations (e.g. IP addresses) from which resources, matching resource names which it “owns”, can be obtained. When a node in the overlay network receives a request for a resource, the node determines whether or not it owns the corresponding hash value. If so, it returns the location of the resource to the requester (via the overlay network). If it does not own the hash value, it inspects its routing table to identify that node within the table which has a hash value closest to the hash value of the request, and forwards the request to that node. The receiving node repeats the procedure, and so on until the request arrives at the node which does own the hash value corresponding to the request and which therefore knows the resource location. 
       FIG. 1  illustrates an overlay network organised as a ring (only a small number of the nodes within the ring are illustrated). In this example, each node maintains a routing table containing the locations and hash values of a small number of succeeding and preceding nodes in the ring, as well as for a small number of more distant nodes. In the illustrated network, a Node X maintains within its routing table locations for two successor nodes and two predecessor nodes, as well as for three remote nodes. Whilst a larger number of entries within the routing tables can make the network more efficient in terms of routing and more robust against node withdrawal, large tables are difficult to maintain and therefore increase the unreliability of the network. 
     A node within the overlay network ensures that the information in its routing table is up to date by attempting to contact its neighbours periodically. A number of different mechanisms may be used for this purpose:
         1) A node can periodically send keep-alive messages to check that the other nodes listed in its routing table have not left the overlay network. This mechanism is used by DHT approaches such as Pastry [A. Rowstron and P. Druschel: Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. Middleware, 2001], Chord [I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, M. F. Kaashoek and H. Balakrishnan: Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-peer Lookup Service for Internet Applications. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM&#39;01 Conference, August 2001, San Diego, Calif., USA.] and Content Addressable Network (CAN) [S. Ratsanamy, P. Francis, M. Handley, R. Karp and S. Shenker: A scalable content-addressable network. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2001, August 2001].   2) A node can periodically send queries to learn about new nodes that could be inserted into the routing table, replacing old entries (e.g. Chord).   3) A node can periodically send queries to its direct neighbours requesting information about the entries in its neighbours&#39; routing tables. This information is used to update the node&#39;s own routing table (e.g. Chord).   4) A node can periodically send its own routing table to its neighbours (e.g. CAN).       

     Another (additional) approach to maintaining the routing tables involves a node checking whether the originator of a resource request could be inserted into its routing table (e.g. Kademlia [P. Maymounkov and D. Mazieres: Kademlia: A peer-to-peer information system based on the xor metric. In Proceedings of IPTPS02, Cambridge, USA, March 2002]). 
     Consider  FIG. 2  which shows an example of neighbourhood relations in a DHT. In the Figure, a ring topology is assumed. Node X maintains three successors and three predecessor pointers in its routing table. It should already be clear that the reason for maintaining multiple successor and predecessor pointers is to increase robustness. If the probability that a single successors will fail is p, then the probability that all three successors will fail simultaneously is p 3 . However, in extremely large real-world DHT-based overlay networks, this is not sufficient to maintain connectivity in the network; if all three successors (or alternatively, all three predecessors) of a given node leave the network within a sufficiently short period of time, the network fragments. 
     Nodes can leave the network either gracefully or ungracefully. When leaving gracefully, a node informs its neighbours about its intention to leave the network prior to actually leaving. The node does this by sending a Leave message (understood at the application layer). This allows the neighbours to immediately remove the leaving node from their routing tables. When a node leaves the network ungracefully, it exits the network without first informing its neighbours. Therefore, the neighbours must detect for themselves that the node has left. Reasons for ungraceful leaving include the following: (i) the node has crashed, (ii) the P2P application has crashed or has been closed down unexpectedly, and (iii) selfish behaviour. In alternative (iii), a user may choose to leave ungracefully in order to avoid delays inherent in a graceful departure. 
     In the case of an ungraceful departure from the overlay network, nodes can learn that a neighbour has left in two different ways:
         1) When the underlying transport protocol is reliable (e.g. TCP), the departure of a neighbour is detected quickly from the fact that the transport layer connection goes down.   2) When the transport protocol is unreliable (e.g. UDP), a node does not learn that the neighbour has left until it attempts to send the next periodic DHT maintenance message to the neighbour. In addition to waiting for the transmission of the next periodic maintenance message, the node also has to wait until the transaction times out before it can be certain that the neighbour has really left.       

     In the case of both graceful and ungraceful departure, the end result is that each of the leaving node&#39;s direct neighbours has one pointer less in its routing table. For instance, if node S 1  in  FIG. 1  leaves the network, Node X only has two successor pointers left, namely S 2  and S 3 . If also S 2  and S 3  also leave the network before Node X has a chance to find additional successors, the overlay network becomes partitioned since Node X no longer knows any successors. A similar situation can arise in respect of the predecessor nodes of Node X. 
     Thus, a problem with existing solutions is that if all of the successors or predecessors of a given node fail within a short period of time, the network can become partitioned, and resource requests cannot bridge the gap. This “short period of time” refers to the time between two consecutive DHT maintenance messages. If such maintenance messages are sent for instance every 60 seconds, then the overlay network is disrupted if all the successors or predecessors of even a single node leave the overlay network within this 60 second period. This is not an unlikely event if the network is experiencing a high “churn” rate. Whilst an intuitive solution to this problem would be to send DHT maintenance messages more frequently, the interval between periodic maintenance messages cannot be made arbitrarily small as the resulting signalling load would overload the network. This problem has been confirmed by S. Rhea, D. Geels, T. Roscoe and J. Kubiatowicz: Handling Churn in a DHT, In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference, June 2004. 
     SUMMARY 
     It is an object of the present invention to minimise disruption to an overlay network when a node fails or otherwise withdraws from the network. At least certain embodiments of the invention achieve this object by allowing the withdrawing node, or a neighbouring node of the withdrawing node, to update the routing tables of other neighbours. 
     According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method of maintaining routing tables at nodes of an overlay network, where a routing table of a given node contains, for each of a set of neighbouring successor and predecessor nodes, a mapping between an overlay network address of the node and a physical locator of the node. 
     The method comprises, upon or immediately prior to departure of a node from the overlay network, sending a Leave request from the departing node (or one of the neighbouring nodes of the departing node aware of the departure) to each neighbouring node (or each other neighbouring node of the departing node), indicating the departure and containing one or more mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. Each neighbouring node (or each other neighbouring node) receives the Leave request and uses said mapping(s) to update its routing table. 
     Embodiments of the invention allow neighbours of a withdrawing node to quickly update their routing tables with a replacement predecessor or successor node. In the event of high churn in the network, the risk of a fracture in the network chain is greatly reduced. 
     According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a method of maintaining routing tables at nodes of an overlay network, where a routing table of a given node contains, for each of a set of neighbouring successor and predecessor nodes, a mapping between an overlay network address of the node and a physical locator of the node. 
     The method comprises, immediately prior to departure of a node from the overlay network, sending a Leave request from the departing node to each neighbouring node of the departing node, indicating the departure and containing one or more overlay network address to physical locator mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. Upon receipt of a Leave request at each neighbouring node, the node uses the mapping(s) to update its routing table. 
     In an embodiment of this aspect of the invention, at least one mapping contained within a Leave request corresponds to a neighbouring node of the departing node which is unknown to the recipient node. 
     According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a method of maintaining routing tables at nodes of an overlay network, where a routing table of a given node contains, for each of a set of neighbouring successor and predecessor nodes, a mapping between an overlay network address of the node and a physical locator of the node. 
     The method comprises, upon departure of a node from the overlay network, sending a Leave request from one of the neighbouring nodes of the departing node aware of the departure, to other neighbouring node of the departing node, the request indicating the departure and containing one or more mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. Upon receipt of a Leave request at said each other neighbouring node, the node uses said mapping(s) to update its routing table. 
     In an embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the node sending the Leave request(s) detects the departure of the departing node as a result of the failure of the departing node to respond to periodically transmitted keep-alive messages. It reacts to the detection by sending the Leave request(s). Said one or more mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node may be mappings contained within the routing table of the node sending the Leave request. 
     A node receiving a Leave request may determine if the recipient node is aware of any neighbouring nodes of the departing node and of which the node sending the Leave request is unaware. If so, the receiving node sends a Leave request to that or those nodes, the Leave request containing one or more overlay network address to physical locator mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. Upon receipt of the Leave request at the or each further recipient node, the node updates its routing table. 
     It will be understood that said step of updating the routing table at a recipient node may comprise deleting the mapping corresponding to the departing node and adding the new mappings contained within the received Leave request to the routing table. 
     A feature that may be advantageously incorporated into embodiments of the invention is the caching one or more mappings for nodes not included within the respective routing tables. In the event of the departure of a node from the network, the routing table of at least one neighbouring node of the departing node can be updated to include one or more of the cached mappings. 
     According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a node for use within an overlay network and comprising a memory for storing a routing table containing, for each of a set of neighbouring successor and predecessor nodes, a mapping between an overlay network address of the node and a physical locator of the node. The node also comprises a processing unit configured to send a Leave request to one or neighbouring nodes of the node upon departure of the node or of a neighbouring node from the network, the Leave request identifying the departing node and containing one or more overlay network address to physical locator mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. 
     The node may comprise a further processing unit configured to receive a Leave request from a neighbouring node, to delete the mapping corresponding to the departing node identified in the Leave request from the routing table contained within said memory, and to add one or more new mappings contained within the Leave request to the routing table. A still further processing unit may be configured to determine if the Leave request originates from the departing node and, if not, to inspect said routing table to identify any neighbouring nodes of the departing node of which the node sending the Leave request is unaware, and to send a Leave request to any such identified nodes. This Leave request identifies the departing node and contains one or more mappings for nodes not contained within the routing table of the recipient node. 
     The node may comprise a further memory for caching one or more mappings for nodes not included within the routing table and a further processor for updating the routing table to include one or more of the cached mappings, in the event of the departure of a neighbouring node from the network. 
     According to a fifth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of maintaining routing tables at nodes of an overlay network, where a routing table of a given node contains, for each of a set of neighbouring successor and predecessor nodes, a mapping between an overlay network address of the node and a physical locator of the node. 
     The method comprises periodically exchanging maintenance messages between said nodes in order to provide updated addressing information for nodes. When addressing information is received at a given node for a peer node and that peer node is not included within the routing table of the given node, the information is cached at the given node. In the event that a node contained within the routing table of the given node withdraws from the network, the peer node is added to the routing table using the cached information. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  illustrates schematically a DHT-based ring overlay network comprising a number of nodes; 
         FIG. 2  further illustrates a DHT-based ring overlay network, showing neighbourhood relations between nodes; 
         FIG. 3  illustrates schematically a node of the overlay network of  FIG. 2 ; 
         FIG. 4  is a flow diagram illustrating a mechanism for handling the graceful departure of a node from the overlay network of  FIG. 2 ; and 
         FIG. 5  is a flow diagram illustrating a mechanism for handling the ungraceful departure of a node from the overlay network of  FIG. 2 ; and 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The optimized DHT leave operation described here relies upon a node assisting a neighbouring node to quickly update its routing tables in the event that the neighbouring node&#39;s routing table is affected by the departure of a node from the network. The departing node may be the neighbouring node, i.e. in the graceful departure scenario, or another neighbouring node in the case of an ungraceful departure. These two scenarios will now be considered in detail. 
     Reference is made again to  FIG. 2  which shows an example of a Chord DHT-based overlay network using a ring topology. Whilst Chord DHT is used here by way of example, the procedures described are equally applicable to other DHT-based overlay networks. In the example illustrated, it is assumed that each node in the DHT-based overlay network maintains pointers to six neighbours: namely three predecessor nodes and three successor nodes. Of course, the proposed mechanism works with any number of successor and predecessor pointers. 
     In  FIG. 2 , a Node X has three successors: S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 . If the overlay network is experiencing heavy “churn”, all of the successors of Node X might choose to leave the overlay network within a short time frame. Assuming that the nodes depart gracefully, they will send Leave requests to their neighbours. However, as described above, Node X may not have time to identify any other successor nodes before all three successors have left the network. In order to avoid a partitioning of the network in this scenario, each node that intends to leave the overlay helps its neighbours to fill their routing tables with alternative neighbour nodes, before actually leaving the network. 
     In the text below, the term “neighbour table” is used to refer to a part of the routing table containing pointers to direct neighbours, the term “predecessor table” is used to refer to the part of the neighbour table containing the predecessor pointers, and the term “successor table” is used to refer to the part of the neighbour table containing the successor pointers. 
     Consider the case where node S 1  in  FIG. 2  chooses to leave the overlay network gracefully. As with all other nodes in the network, S 1  maintains pointers to neighbouring nodes in its routing table. In  FIG. 2  it is assumed that node S 1  maintains three predecessor and three successor pointers. The successors of node S 1  are S 2 , S 3  and A. The predecessors of node S 1  include X, P 1  and P 2 . Before leaving the network, node S 1  repeats the following procedure for each of its neighbours N:
         If node N is a predecessor of node S 1 , node S 1  constructs a new successor table for N and includes it in the Leave message that is sent to node N. Node S 1  should not include itself in the successor table it creates for node N. The successor table can include nodes between S 1  and N as well as successors of S 1 . Indeed, this will be the case when N is not the immediate predecessor of S 1 . Some of these intervening nodes may be previously unknown to N. (According to the Chord DHT algorithm, only the successor of a newly joined node is aware of the node: other nodes will learn about the new node when the next periodic DHT maintenance message is scheduled).   If node N is a successor of node S 1 , node S 1  crates a new predecessors table for node N and includes this in the Leave message sent to node N. This table includes any of S 1 &#39;s successors that are located between node S 1  and node N. Node S 1  should not of course include itself in the predecessors table sent to node N.   Having received the Leave message containing the successors/predecessors table from node S 1 , node N first removes node S 1  from its routing table. Next, N goes through the list of nodes carried in the Leave message. For each node in the list, node N compares the node to the entries in its successor and predecessor tables, and inserts a node into the correct position in the table if the node is not already present.       

     This procedure ensures that the overlay network remains in a stable state and retains full connectivity even after the departure of node S 1 . That is, the departure of node S 1  does not in any way hinder the operation of the network. 
     A different situation arises if a node (e.g. node A in  FIG. 2 ) leaves the network without informing its neighbours. This could happen due to a sudden crash or some other abnormal termination of the P2P application, or due to selfish behaviour on the part of the leaving node. Assume that the neighbour B of node A is the first node within the overlay network to detect that node A has failed (e.g. from the fact that a periodic keep-alive message, maintenance message or any other message targeted to node A has failed). Node B is made responsible for informing the other neighbours of node A of node A&#39;s departure and for updating the contents of the other neighbours&#39; neighbour tables. However, as node B cannot re-create the full neighbour table of node A (in this example, node B has no knowledge of S 1  which is a neighbour of node A but not of node B), neighbours other than B must participate in the procedure by updating the neighbour tables of those neighbours of which node B is unaware. 
     In the exceptional case that the neighbour which first detects the departure of node A is the most distant successor or the most distant predecessor of node A, then that neighbour does not have any information available which the other neighbours do not already know. Thus, the most distant neighbours cannot update the contents of the closer neighbours&#39; neighbour tables. However, the most distant neighbours can still send an empty Leave message on behalf of node A which will trigger the closer neighbours to send Leave requests with neighbour tables to other neighbours (the closer neighbours have information which benefits the other nodes). 
     By way of example, assume that node X in  FIG. 2  leaves the network without informing its neighbours, i.e. nodes S 1 , S 2 , S 3 , P 1 , P 2  and P 3 . Assume further that node S 1  is the first node to detect that node X has left, for example due to the failure of node X to respond to a keep-alive message from node S 1 . Immediately after having detected the failure of node X, node S 1  will create an as-accurate-as-possible representation of the contents of the neighbour table of node X. In this case, S 1  can recreate information in respect of five of the six neighbours of node X. This is because S 1  knows all the successors of node X and two of the predecessors of node X. Next, node S 1  performs the following procedure for each neighbour N of node X that it is aware of:
         Node S 1  constructs the contents of the neighbour table of node N.   Node S 1  removes node X from the neighbour table it constructed for node N, chooses appropriate nodes from the recovered neighbour table of node X and inserts these into the new neighbour table for node N. More specifically, if node N is a predecessor of node X, node S 1  creates a new successor table for node N. Alternatively, if node N is a successor of node X, node S 1  creates a new predecessor table for node N.   Node S 1  sends a Leave request on behalf of node X to node N and includes in this the new successor or predecessor table it has created.   Node N updates its neighbour table based on the Leave request it receives from node S 1 .       

     When determining the contents of the routing table of node X, node S 1  does not know the identity of the most distant predecessor of node X, namely P 3 . However, both P 1  and P 2  know the identity of P 3 . Therefore, when a neighbour N of node X receives a Leave request sent by another node on behalf of node X (it can detect this as the source address of the originator of the Leave request does not match the address of node X), neighbour N carries out the following actions:
         Node N recreates a representation of the contents of the neighbour table of node X. More specifically, if node N is a predecessor of node X, node N recreates the predecessor table of X. On the other hand, if node N is a successor of node X, node N recreates a representation of the successor table of node X.   Based on the neighbour table it constructed, node N checks if it is aware of any neighbours of node X that the sender of the Leave request (i.e. node S 1 ) is not aware of Assuming that node N is node P 2  in  FIG. 2 , P 2  detects that the sender of the Leave request, node S 1 , is not aware of node P 3  (i.e. the third predecessor of node X).   Node N sends a Leave request on behalf of node X to each of the neighbours of node X that the sender of the Leave request is not aware of. Assuming again that node N is node P 2  of  FIG. 2  and the sender is S 1 , P 2  would send a Leave request to node P 3 .   Finally, node N returns a list of the neighbours of node X of which the sender of the Leave request (i.e. node S 1 ) is unaware of (in the response that node N generates to the Leave request). The sender of Leave request (i.e. node S 1 ) can then insert these nodes into its predecessor table.       

     In the example above, the first node to detect that node X has left the overlay network was assumed to be a successor (S 1 ). If the first node to detect that node X has left the overlay network is a predecessor, the predecessor (e.g. P 1 ) has no knowledge of the most distant successor of node X, i.e. S 3  in this example. In this case, one of the successors of node X, e.g. node S 1 , carries out the above-mentioned steps. 
     Maintenance operations are carried out in a DHT network and involve periodic message exchanges between participating nodes in order to learn about new nodes and to check the states of neighbouring nodes. However, nodes in a DHT-based overlay conventionally use only a part of the information which they receive from their neighbours to update their own routing tables, and discard the rest of the information. For instance, in the example network of  FIG. 2 , although node X learns about the existence of node E from its direct neighbour P 1 , node X normally discards this information, since it maintains only three predecessor pointers, predecessors P 1 , P 2  and P 3 , in its predecessor table. However, if node X caches node E&#39;s contact information, it can more quickly recover from the possible ungraceful departure of node P 1  (and also of P 2  and P 3 ). In other words, although node X does not insert node E into its neighbour table, node can X store the contact information of node E into another data structure implementing a neighbour cache. If node P 1  suddenly leaves the network, node X can check the cache and contact for example node E to see if it is alive and can be added to the routing table. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 3 , there is illustrated schematically a node  1  of a DHT-based overlay network suitable for implementing the described mechanism. The node  1  comprises a memory  2  configured to store the routing table for the node. The node is provided with an interface  3  to other nodes in the overlay network (typically an interface to an IP network, e.g. the Internet). A first processing unit  4  is configured to receive Leave requests from neighbouring nodes via the interface  3 . In the event that a Leave request is received, the first processing unit causes the routing table to be updated as described above. The Leave request is also received by a second processing unit  5  which determines if the departing node is the node that sent the request. If this is not the case, the second processing unit  5  inspects its routing table to identify any neighbouring nodes of the departing node of which the node that sent the request is unaware. It then constructs one or more further Leave requests and sends these to the identified nodes. 
     A third processing unit  6  is configured to handle the graceful departure of the node from the network. It does this by sending a Leave request to the node&#39;s neighbours, identifying one or more substitute mappings for each neighbouring node. This third processing unit is also configured to be notified by a connectivity detector  7 , responsible for periodically sending keep-alive messages to neighbouring nodes, when a neighbour leaves the overlay network ungracefully, and to send appropriate Leave requests to neighbours of the departed node. 
     A fourth processing unit  8  maintains a cache within a memory  9 , containing mappings for nodes not contained within the current routing table. In the event that the fourth processing unit receives a Leave request from a neighbour, the unit may extract a mapping from the cache memory and add this to the routing table. 
     With reference now to  FIG. 4 , this illustrates the mechanism applied in the graceful departure scenario. At steps S 1  to S 3 , the departing node sends Leave requests to its neighbouring nodes (only three of which are illustrated). At steps S 4  to S 6 , each of the neighbouring nodes updates its routing tables. 
       FIG. 5  illustrates the mechanism applied in the case of the ungraceful departure scenario. At step T 1 , a first neighbouring node of a departing node sends a periodic keep-alive message to the departing node. After a timeout T 2  at the first neighbour during which no response to the keep-alive is received, the first neighbour updates its routing table at step T 3  to delete the entry for the departed node. At steps T 4  and T 5 , the first neighbour sends Leave requests to neighbours of the departed node, on behalf of the departed node. The contain new mappings as described above. Upon receipt of the Leave requests, at steps T 6  and T 7  the neighbours update their routing tables. One of the neighbours, in this case the third neighbour, is aware of a further neighbour of the departed node which the first neighbour is unaware of. At step T 8  the neighbour sends a further leave request to that further neighbour. At step T 9  the further neighbour updates its routing table. 
     As the mechanism described here improves the robustness of a DHT-based overlay network, it is especially useful for critical DHT-based systems such P2PSIP telephony networks such as are being standardized by the P2PSIP working group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). 
     It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that various modifications may be made to the above described embodiment without departing from the scope of the present invention.