Abstract:
New and useful blends of thermosetting resins with copolymers of certain amounts of ethylene with another monomer copolymerizable therewith to provide solid but flexible polymers, and a third monomer containing epoxy side groups, and optionally carbon monoxide, are provided. These blends result in performance unattainable with the thermosetting resin alone in terms of flexibility, toughness, and adhesion. Such blends may be used, for example, to produce flexible, semirigid or rigid films, coatings, fibers, foams or molded articles.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
     This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application Ser. No. 681,741, filed Apr. 29, 1976, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 580,515, filed May 23, 1975 now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention relates to blends of ethylene copolymers, curable compositions, and shaped articles formed therefrom. More particularly this invention relates to blends of thermosetting resins with copolymers of ethylene, a flexibilizing monomer, a third monomer which contains epoxy side groups, and optionally carbon monoxide. This invention also relates to shaped articles, films, and fibers formed from such blends. 
     2. Description of the Prior Art 
     Ethylene polymers are characterized by a low polarity and low reactivity. They are like waxes in this respect, having a low dielectric constant and being soluble in hot oils, hot wax and hot hydrocarbons. They also are well known to be very inert. For some uses it is desirable to modify the ethylene polymers to make them flexible, to impart more polarity to the polymers, and to be able to use them in reaction with other resins. A small degree of polarity and a certain amount of flexibility can be imparted to an ethylene polymer by incorporation therein of unsaturated organic esters, such as vinyl acetate or acrylates. However, to obtain a high degree of polarity high levels of ester are required which in turn adversely affects the inherit advantage of the long ethylene chain, e.g., low cost, good low temperature behavior, etc. Thus it is desirable to increase the polarity of an ethylene copolymer while retaining the hydrocarbon chain as the major feature of the polymer. Ethylene copolymers, however, modified to be more flexible and more polar may still be relatively unreactive. 
     The art regarding thermosetting resins and especially blends with other polymers will now be considered. Commercially available thermosetting resins such as phenolics, epoxys, etc., have been found to be useful because of the retention of their performance at elevated temperatures. This retention of performance is associated with the cross-linking or curing action inherent in the structure of the thermosetting resins utilized. However, this retention of high temperature performance is accompanied by high stiffness and brittleness making it desirable to lower the stiffness of such material or if some stiffness is desired by providing a higher degree of toughness. The obvious solution, to blend a flexible polymer into the thermosetting resin, has not been successful to the best of our knowledge. Molecular compatibility has not been achieved; the desirable properties of the thermoset are lost. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     According to the present invention there are provided curable blends of 1 to 99 percent by weight of solid organic thermosetting resins taken from the class consisting of phenolic resins, e.g., phenol formaldehyde resins; epoxy resins, and melamine formaldehyde resins with 1 to 99 percent by weight of copolymers consisting essentially of, by weight (a) 40 to 90 percent ethylene; (b) 0 to 20 percent carbon monoxide; (c) 5 to 40 percent of a monomer copolymerizable therewith to provide flexible polymers, said monomer taken from the class consisting of unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids of 3 to 20 carbon atoms, esters of said unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids, vinyl esters of saturated carboxylic acids where the acid group has 1 to 18 carbon atoms, vinyl alkyl ethers where the alkyl group has 1 to 18 carbon atoms, acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, alpha-olefins of 3 to 20 carbon atoms, norbornene and vinyl aromatic compounds; and (d) 0.2 to 15 percent of an ethylenically unsaturated monomer of 4 to 21 carbon atoms containing an epoxy group. 
     The term &#34;phenolic resins&#34; is meant to include thermosetting phenol-aldehyde resins, e.g., those made from phenol, cresol, e.g., m-p-cresol mixture, p-cresol or cresylic acid, resorcinol with aldehydes such as formaldehyde and furfural. The one-step type (resoles) or the two-step type (novalaks) are useful (U.S. Pat. No. 3,438,931). Also useful are phenol-formaldehyde resins modified with alkyl phenols (e.g., cresols), polyhydric phenols (e.g., resorcinol, hydroquinone, etc.), or polyphenols (e.g., Bisphenol-A). Preferred blends contain copolymers of (a) ethylene, (b) carbon monoxide, (c) a monomer copolymerizable therewith taken from the class consisting of vinyl alkanoates, e.g., vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate, vinyl butyrate; alkyl acrylates and alkyl methacrylates wherein alkyl is from 1 to 20 carbon atoms; and (d) an epoxy-containing monomer taken from the class consisting of epoxy esters of copolymerizable unsaturated organic acids, epoxy ethers of vinyl ethers and allyl ethers and mono-epoxy substituted di-olefins of 4 to 12 carbon atoms. 
     A specific preferred blend contains a copolymer of (a) ethylene, (b) carbon monoxide, (c) vinyl acetate, and (d) glycidyl acrylate or methacrylate. 
     Another specific preferred blend contains a copolymer of (a) ethylene, (b) vinyl acetate and (c) glycidyl acrylate or methacrylate. 
     The copolymers in the preferred blends contain the following weight percent of components (a) to (d): 
     (a) 45 to 90, more preferably, 50 to 70. 
     (b) 0 to 15, more preferably, 0 to 3 or 10 to 15. 
     (c) 10 to 33, more preferably, 20 to 30. 
     (d) 0.4 to 9, more preferably, 1.5 to 6. 
     The copolymers normally have a melt index within the range of 0.1 to 3,000; preferably 5 to 500. 
     The above curable blends may be formed into a sheet, a block for molding purposes, or a fiber before the blends are cured. The curable blends can be a solid form which is grindable into a powder and then formed into a molding or shaped article, into a film, a coating, or into a fiber before curing. 
     Cured compositions, in the forms described above, result from heating, e.g., oven, mold, etc., the above curable blends. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The poor performance of thermosetting resins such as phenolics is generally exhibited by a high degree of brittleness. This is usually exhibited either by a brittle failure from a high speed impact, or by a brittle failure at low strains under a slow speed test such as bending. In actual use, this may occur with the dropping of a molded object such as a bottle cap to the floor, the twisting of a toy, or even by slight thermal strains. The latter occur regularly on a molded piece with metal inserts which might be used under the hood of a car. 
     In order to demonstrate the present invention it is necessary to reduce the qualitative brittleness problems described above to quantitative laboratory measurements. In slow-rate flexural measurements we have found that conventional filled phenolics and epoxies fail when the strain on the sample is as little as about 1%. For practical purposes, raising the level of strain to failure by 2-3 fold; i.e., to 2-3% is a major accomplishment. 
     For impact measurements, the notched Izod test has been chosen. In this test, the ability of the molded piece to absorb impact energy is measured. Conventional filled phenolic molding resins show very low values, say 0.1 to 0.3 ft-pounds per inch of notch, when the sample is broken. This value depends upon the type or combination of filler. It can be increased by modifying the structure with more expensive phenolics, or by using fillers such as long glass fibers or cotton floc. Resins using these types of fillers are provided on a commercial basis, but are not used extensively because of the high cost of making the blend, and difficulties in actual use of the commercial product. 
     Thus there has continued to be a need for a resin modifier which can be added to the thermosetting molding compound to increase its toughness. 
     This invention requires and depends upon the compatibility of the modifying resin with the thermosetting resin. There are two types of compatibility involved in this invention and at two stages in use, before and after curing. 
     One type of compatibility is the most common one, where the blends of the two resins are completely miscible on a molecular scale, and give clear films. This invention encompasses that type of compatibility as described herein. 
     This invention also requires and depends on a second and lower degree of compatibility which is also important. It is often possible to blend two resins and find them to appear to be incompatible as evidenced by the two-phase opacity of a molded film. Nevertheless we find that the blend is strong and tough; the two resins are functionally compatible. This functional compatibility occurs because the two phases are interdependent and not pure phases of the starting resins. Each phase contains a small amount of the other resin. In fact in molten two-phase blends of this type there is an equilibrium condition with a constant migration of molecules across the phase boundaries. One theory suggests that the cooled sample has some molecules trapped part way across the boundary and thereby imparting the improved mechanical performance. 
     Most polymer/polymer blends do not exhibit this functional compatibility. Blends such as polyvinyl chloride with polystyrene seem to show no molecular interdependence in the melt and do in fact show extremely friable, brittle opaque films. This behavior is the general case. It is part of this invention to tailor the structure of the modifying resin to the structure of the uncured thermosetting resin to give good melt working characteristics and functional compatibility. 
     It is also essential to this invention that the compatibility not be destroyed by the curing process. It is possible to devise a polymer-resin blend which is completely compatible (clear) before curing, but which becomes two-phase (opaque) after curing. The molecular motion which occurs during the curing process enables the resin molecules to achieve the best position for the chemical curing, and at the same time rejects the modifier molecules into a separate, second phase. 
     An essential part of this invention is the incorporation in the modifier molecule of a site which cocures with thermosetting resin. Such a site is essential for both the completely compatible blends and the functionally compatible blends of the present invention. 
     The copolymers in the blends of this invention consist essentially of the above described amounts of ethylene, carbon monoxide and monomers (c) and (d) which are copolymerizable ethylenically unsaturated organic compounds. Monomers (c) are selected from the class consisting of unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids of 3 to 20 carbon atoms, esters of such unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids, vinyl esters of saturated carboxylic acids where the acid group has 1 to 18 carbon atoms, vinyl alkyl ethers where the alkyl group has 1 to 18 carbon atoms, acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, and copolymerizable unsaturated hydrocarbons, such as alpha-olefins of 3 to 20 carbon atoms, ring compounds, such as norbornene, and vinyl aromatic compounds. Vinyl acetate is preferred monomer (c). 
     Monomers (d) are ethylenically unsaturated monomers of 4 to 21 carbon atoms which contain an epoxy group. Such monomers are taken from the class consisting of epoxy esters of copolymerizable unsaturated organic acids, e.g., acrylic or methacrylic; the epoxy ethers of vinyl ethers and allyl ethers, e.g., glycidyl vinyl ether, vinyl cyclohexane monoxide, etc., or the mono-epoxy substituted di-olefins of 4 to 12 carbon atoms. Glycidyl acrylate and methacrylate are preferred monomers (d). 
     In preparing the copolymers of the present invention, commercially available ethylene, carbon monoxide and unsaturated monomers (c) and (d) of about 100 percent purity are used initially and in supplying continuous make-up for the polymerization feed stream. The reactor vessel used is capable of withstanding high pressures and temperatures, and is equipped with a high speed motor-driven stirrer and pressure relief valves, as well as jacketed walls for circulating heating or cooling fluids in order to control temperature. Carbon monoxide and the other monomers are pumped into the ethylene monomer feed stream at the pressure of the reactor, and then the mixture of monomers is pumped at reactor pressure into the reactor, either together or separately. Catalyst, as necessary, is pumped into the reactor through a separate feed line. 
     A mixture of copolymer and monomer exits the reactor, and the pressure is reduced as the mixture flows into a separator. Monomers leave the separator and are either destroyed or pumped for recycle to the reactor together with make-up monomers. Molten copolymer leaves the separator in a stream, from which it is cooled and further processed, e.g., the copolymer may be cut into suitable sized particles and put into suitable containers for shipping. 
     The flow of ethylene, carbon monoxide, monomers (c) and (d) and catalyst into the reactor is carefully controlled so that they enter the reactor in constant continuous molar ratios and at the same continuous rate at which product and unreacted monomers are discharged from the reactor. The rates and molar ratios are adjusted so as to provide in the product copolymer, by weight, 40 to 90 percent ethylene, 0 to 20 percent carbon monoxide, 5 to 40 percent of monomer (c) and 0.2 to 15 percent monomer (d). Effective stirring, usually at a rate of at least 0.25 horsepower per gallon of reactor volume, is provided in order to keep the reacting monomers in intimate admixture throughout the reactor. The reactor temperature should be at least 140° C. It is preferred that the reactor temperature be maintained within the range of about 155°-300° C., most preferably 155°-225° C., and that the reactor pressure be maintained within the range of 5000-60,000 psi, preferably about 20,000-35,000 psi. 
     It is important in preparing the copolymers of the present invention that the contents of the reactor be kept uniform with respect to the weight ratios of ethylene, carbon monoxide and monomers (c) and (d) to produce the solid copolymers of the present invention. None of the monomers should be depleted so that not less than all of the monomers are reacting. Since the various monomers react at different rates, a larger percentage of faster reacting monomers will react in a given time. Consequently, the ratio of feed rate for the monomers will be different from the desired ratio of those monomers in the copolymer produced. Thus, carbon monoxide reacts at a rate about five times that of ethylene, so that when 10 percent of the ethylene present has been incorporated in polymer, about 50 percent of the carbon monoxide present is in polymer. Conditions required to produce specific copolymers vary, depending on the reactivity of monomers (c) and (d), e.g., vinyl acetate reacts at about the same rate as does ethylene, whereas other monomers such as methyl methacrylate react about as fast as or faster than carbon monoxide. The epoxy-containing monomers (d) may react at rates which vary between the speed of reaction of ethylene and carbon monoxide. 
     The free-radical polymerization catalyst employed in the process can be any of those commonly used in the polymerization of ethylene, such as the peroxides, the peresters, the azo compounds, or the percarbonates. Selected compounds within these groups are dilauroyl peroxide, ditertiary butyl peroxide, tertiary butyl perisobutyrate, tertiary butyl peracetate, α, α-azobisisobutyronitrile and other compounds of comparable free-radical activity. Usually the catalyst will be dissolved in a suitable inert organic liquid solvent such as benzene, kerosene, mineral oil or mixtures of solvents. The usual catalyst level is used, i.e., about 25 to 2500 ppm. preferably about 75 to 500 ppm, based on the weight of the monomers fed to the reactor. 
     For the purpose of this invention it is desirable to understand the nature of blends of two molten polymers as the blending is affected by the molecular nature of high polymers. Thermosetting resins, such as phenolic resins, are produced as medium molecular weight polymers for processing into the desired form prior to the curing step. (These resins are not formable after curing.) When one melts an uncured thermosetting resin and attempts to blend in a molten thermoplastic resin, the dispersion of the thermoplastic polymer is accomplished through a shearing of the molten thermosetting resin. In order to disperse the molten thermoplastic polymer into very small droplets there must be an interaction between the two molten polymers at their mutual interface, so that the shear forces in the molten thermosetting resin can act on the molten thermoplastic resins. This is accomplished when each polymer is partially soluble in the other. Otherwise the thermoplastic resin remains in the liquid as relatively large particles. The first requirement in this invention, then, is the discovery of the molecular structure which will provide a thermoplastic resin which is partially soluble in the liquid thermosettable resin. 
     The curing of a thermosetting resin occurs by the chemical linking of the thermosettable molecules through sites which occur on the average at more than two per molecule. When a nonreactive thermoplastic polymer is dissolved in the thermosetting resin, these thermosettable molecules move around rapidly during curing to exclude the thermoplastic polymer. The thermoplastic polymer is thereby forced out of the solidifying thermosetting composition. As a result a two phase system is formed. One phase is the rigid brittle thermosetting matrix. The second phase consists of the previously dissolved thermoplastic resin. The second requirement of this invention, then, is the incorporation of a reactive epoxy group in the thermoplastic copolymer which will provide a site through which the thermoplastic copolymer participates in the curing step. The thermoplastic copolymer is thereby intimately bound into the matrix of the cured thermosetting resin. 
     To summarize, the thermoplastic resin is intended to act as a useful modifier for the thermosetting resin. To be effective, it must be partially dispersed on a molecular scale, i.e., partially dissolved in the thermosetting resin before the cure; and it must remain substantially dispersed in the thermosetting resin after cure. 
     Another point which must be recognized is that there are two useful degrees of dispersion in terms of the description above. One is when the thermoplastic resin is so well dispersed, after cure, that the resultant blend is clear. A molded cured film from such a blend is more flexible than the unmodified thermosetting resin. It has a modest and useful degree of elongation before the sample fails; but when the sample does fail, it fails in a brittle fashion without much absorption of energy. It is well known in the art, however, that rubbery impact modifiers for rigid thermoplastic resins should be finely dispersed as a separate phase which is intimately bonded to the rigid phase. 
     Thermosetting resins, on the other hand, are much more difficult to toughen. The present invention embodies the discovery of adjusting the structure of the copolymers to achieve the same type of effect; i.e., the copolymers of the present invention can be adjusted so they dissolve only partially in the uncured thermosetting resin. Then, after curing, the tiny agglomerates of the thermoplastic resin of the present invention are capable of absorbing impact energy, but do so, in fact, only because they are also bonded through reactive sites to the molecules of the cured thermosetting matrix. 
     The copolymers described above can be used to make curable blends with effective amounts of solid organic thermosetting resins taken from the class consisting of phenolic resins, e.g., phenol formaldehyde resins; epoxy resins, and melamine formaldehyde resins. The term &#34;phenolic resins&#34; is meant to include thermosetting phenol-aldehyde resins, e.g., those made from phenol, cresol, e.g., m-p-cresol mixture, p-cresol or cresylic acid, resorcinol with aldehydes such as formaldehyde and furfural. The one-step type (resoles) or the two-step type (novalaks) are useful (U.S. Pat. No. 3,438,931). Also useful are phenol-formaldehyde resins modified with alkyl phenols (e.g., cresols), polyhydric phenols (e.g., resorcinol, hydroquinone, etc.), or polyphenols (e.g., Bisphenol-A). 
     These curable blends may comprise 1 to 99 percent of the above copolymers and 1 to 99 percent of the thermosetting resins. Preferably the copolymer is present in the blend in a percent of 5 to 95 and the thermosetting resin is present in the blend in a percent of 5 to 95. A particularly preferred percentage range for the copolymer is 10 to 50 percent, and the thermosetting resin is 90 to 50 percent. 
     The curable blends described herein may be filled with the conventional fillers used in thermosetting systems. These fillers may be wood flour, asbestos, silica, fiberglass, cotton flock, mica, macerated fabric and cord, rag, carbon black, or metal, such as iron, lead, copper, etc. The curable blends may be used to produce flexible, semirigid or rigid films, coatings, fibers, molded articles, foamed articles and adhesives. 
    
    
     EXAMPLES OF THE INVENTION 
     The following Examples illustrate the invention wherein the percentages are by weight unless indicated. 
     EXAMPLES 1 to 14 
     Copolymers of ethylene, carbon monoxide, vinyl acetate, and a fourth comonomer as specified in Table I were prepared by mixing the respective monomers at the feed rates shown in Table I, then feeding the resultant mixture into a 700 cc highly stirred reaction vessel together with a catalyst of the type and amount given in Table I. 
     The reactor pressures and temperatures and the conversion of monomer to polymer are also given in Table I. The reactor residence time was 4.5 minutes. The melt index of the polymer reported in Table I was determined according to ASTM D1238-65T, Condition E. 
     
                                           TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________COPOLYMER SYNTHESIS                    Reaction Conditions                                          Feed RatioProduct Copolymer                              E/Comonomer                                                     Con-ExampleCopolymer         Monomer                Melt                    Pressure                         Temp.                             Catalyst                                  Catalyst(a)                                          CO/Comonomer                                                     versionNo.  Type     Ratio  Index                    (Atmos.)                         (°C.)                             Type Concentration                                          (Parts by                                                     (%))__________________________________________________________________________1    E/VA/CO/GMA         60/25/13/2.4                52  1630 180 PB   0.40    11/4.1/0.35/0.19                                                     10.22    E/VA/CO/GMA         53/30/11/5.6                660 1630 181 PB   0.30    10/5.0/0.53/0.21                                                     11.83    E/VA/CO/GMA         52/27/13/8.4                45  1630 179 PL   0.42    10/4.9/0.43/0.20                                                     10.44    E/VA/CO/GMA         56/26/15/3.1                50  1630 161 PL   0.56    10/4.4/0.35/0.11                                                     11.05    E/VA/CO/GMA         61/21/15/3.0                94  1630 153 PL   1.30     10/3.1/0.42/0.096                                                      9.96    E/VA/CO/GMA         64/21/10/5.4                70  1830 181 RA55 0.59    10/3.2/0.20/0.14                                                     11.57    E/VA/CO/GMA         62/22/10/6.0                58  1830 180 RA55 0.59    10/3.3/0.22/0.15                                                     10.88    E/VA/CO/GMA         67/17/10/5.9                84  1830 181 RA55 0.82    10/2.6/0.22/0.15                                                     11.19    E/VA/CO/GMA         67/17/10/5.8                96  1830 181 RA55 0.88    10/2.6/0.17/0.15                                                     11.610   E/VA/CO/GA         64/21/9/5.9                72  1830 180 RA55 0.66    10/3.3/0.21/0.14                                                     11.011   E/VA/CO/GMA         61/25/10/4.5                51  1830 180 PO   0.39    10/4.0/0.30/0.10                                                     10.312   E/VA/CO/GMA         63/23/7/7.0                65  1830 174 RA55 0.53    10/2.6/0.20/0.14                                                     11.013   E/VA/CO/GMA         64/18/12/6.3                80  1830 180 RA55 1.03    10/2.6/0.25/0.14                                                     11.414   E/VA/CO/GMA         63/18/13/5.6                45  1830 180 RA55 0.72    10/2.6/0.34/0.15                                                     11.5__________________________________________________________________________ PB = t-Butyl Peroxyisobutyrate PO = t-Butyl Peroctoate (a)Lbs./M Lbs. polymer PL = t-Butyl Peroxypivalate RA55 = 2-t-Butyl Azo-2-Cyano-4-Methoxy-4-Methyl Pentane GMA = Glycidyl Methacrylate GA = Glycidyl Acrylate 
    
     EXAMPLE 15 
     A blend containing 15% of the copolymer of Example 2 with novalak phenolic resin (supplied by Durez Division of Hooker Chemical Company as Durez® 14000, a powdered 2-step type phenol-formaldehyde resin containing about 7% hexamethylenetetramine) was made by dissolving both polymers in tetrahydrofuran. The blend was dried on a steam plate and then pressed into a 2 mil film. The film was cured for 15 minutes at 165° C. in the press at a pressure of 20,000 psi. The cured film from this blend was clear, indicating good compatibility, and could be bent almost 180° before breaking. 
     This result is in contrast to the behavior of a film from the straight cured novalak phenolic resin, which is very brittle and breaks under a very small strain. 
     The compatible nature of this blend is in contrast to that encountered using an ethylene/vinyl acetate/glycidyl methacrylate copolymer, into which no carbon monoxide was copolymerized. An opaque incompatible blend was obtained when this second copolymer was used, indicating the essential nature of the carbon monoxide constituent when clear films are desired. The comonomer ratio of this copolymer was 71/22/7. 
     EXAMPLE 16 
     A solution blend was made containing 35% of the polymer of Example 2 and the novalak phenolic resin of Example 15. The blend was pressed into a 3&#34;×3&#34;×1/8&#34; bar and cured for 10 minutes at 150° C. This bar was cut into bars 21/2&#34;×1/2&#34;×1/8&#34;. The Izod impact strength of these bars was 0.39 ft. lb./inch compared to a value of 0.25 ft. lb./inch for the unmodified phenolic resin. 
     EXAMPLE 17 
     A 50/50 blend was made from solution using the copolymer of Example 3 and the novalak resin of Example 15. The uncured film, cast from the solution, was clear, indicating compatibility. The film was cured in an air oven at 110° C. for 20 min. to give a clear, flexible film. The film could be bent double and creased without cracking. 
     This cured film was placed in a beaker containing boiling acetone. This sample stayed as a film after stirring for 30 minutes, indicating a complete cure. 
     EXAMPLE 18 
     A 50/50 blend was made on a 2-roll mill at a temperature of 75° C. 15 Grams of the polymer of Example 3 was blended with 15 grams of a powdered 1-step type phenolic resin (resole) supplied as Durez® 26164. A 10 mil film was melt pressed from this blend and found to be hazy, indicating only partial compatibility. This blend was pressed into a bar and cured. The Izod impact strength of this bar was 2.5. This is avery high value for a cured polymer. 
     EXAMPLE 19 
     15 g. of the polymer of Example 3 was milled with 15 g. of a powdered two-step phenolic resin (novalak) Durez® 22091 sold by Hooker Chemical Company, which contained no curing agent. The blend was pressed into a 10 mil film and then held in the press at 150° C. for one (1) hour to cure. The film was clear, showing compatibility and was insoluble in boiling tetrahydrofuran showing a cure. 
     EXAMPLE 20 
     A solution 50/50 blend was made from the polymer of Example 3 and the novalak phenolic resin described in Example 15 containing 8 percent of hexamethylenetetramine. A 10 mil film was pressed at 100° C., the temperature was raised to 150° C. for 30 minutes. The film was clear. 
     The tensile properties of this film were: tensile strength, 2150 psi; elongation, 60 percent; tensile modulus, 18,000 psi. When the broken specimens were returned to the original positions, the elongation above was found to be &gt;95% elastic (ASTM D-1708-66 [0.2&#34;/min. crosshead speed]). 
     EXAMPLE 21 
     A solution blend in tetrahydrofuran was made using 0.5 g. of the polymer of Example 1 and 1.5 g. of liquid diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A with an epoxy equivalent weight of about 190 and a viscosity of about 13,000 cps. at 25° C. (Epon® 828 sold by Shell). 0.15 g. of a curing agent triethylenetetramine was added. The solution was evaporated to dryness to form a film. The film was cured by heating over a steam bath for one (1) hour. The film was clear and could be bent double with no indication of brittleness. This behavior was contrast to the brittle behavior of a control film made in the same fashion, but without the polymer of Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 22 
     A solution blend was made in tetrahydrofuran of 50 percent of the polymer of Example 2 and 50 percent of a melamine-formaldehyde resin, hexamethoxymethyl-melamine sold by American Cyanamid (Cymel® 301). p-toluene sulfonic acid was added to give 0.25 percent by weight, exclusive of the solvent, as a catalyst for cure. This solution was coated on aluminum, dried and cured at 150° C. for 1 hour. The film was very slightly hazy, flexible, and could be bent double without cracking. 
     A similar film containing only the melamineformaldehyde resin and catalyst was also coated on aluminum and cured. In contrast, this film was very brittle and cracked when the aluminum was bent. 
     EXAMPLES 23 to 40 
     Following the procedure of Examples 1 to 14 a series of tetrapolymers were prepared. Polymer compositions and reaction conditions are summarized in Table II. 
     
                                           TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________                      Reaction Conditions                                            Feed Ratio Con-Product Copolymer                                E/Comonomer                                                       ver-ExampleCopolymer         Melt                      Pressure                           Temp.                               Catalyst                                    Catalyst                                            CO/Comonomer                                                       sionNo.  Type      Monomer Ratio                  Index                      (Atmos.)                           (°C.)                               Type Concentration.sup.(2)                                            (Parts by                                                       (%))__________________________________________________________________________23   E/VA/CO/GMA          70/18/9/3.5                  60  1830 180 RA-55                                    .54     10/2.58/.17/.14                                                       11.424   E/VA/CO/AGE.sup.(1)          68/17/12/2.9                  40  1830 180 RA-55                                    .87     10/2.63/.45/.06                                                       11.325   E/MA.sup.(3) /CO/GMA          72/11/13/4.2                  45  1830 180 RA-55                                    1.22    10/.25/.30/.11                                                       10.826   E/VA/CO/GMA          68/22/8/2.9                  400 1700 182 RA-55                                    1.37    20/5.2/.30/.18                                                       11.527   E/VA/CO/GMA          73/17/9/1.2                  400 1700 181 RA-55                                    1.89    20/6.6/.90/.21                                                       11.028   E/VA/CO/GMA          62/21/14/3.2                  500 1400 180 RA-55                                    3.94    20/6.6/.90/.19                                                       11.829   E/VA/CO/GMA          60/22/14/4.5                  50  1830 181 LUP 80                                    0.21    10/3.3/0.50/.12                                                       12.630   E/VA/CO/GMA          64/29/4/3.3                  350 1450 181 RA-70                                    .42     14/5.47/0.10/0.09                                                       11.331   E/VA/GMA  65/31/4.5                  50  1830 181 RA-55                                    .25     22/6.65/.18                                                       12.232   E/MA/GMA  71/24/5.3                  15  1830 180 RA-55                                    1.59    10/.42/.10 10.733   E/VA/GMA  77/19/4.7                  40  1830 181 RA-55                                    .53     10/2.5/.6  11.034   E/VA/GMA  71/24/4.2                  60  1830 182 RA-55                                    .51     10/3.50/.11                                                       11.835   E/VA/GMA  62/34/3.7                  70  1830 181 RA-55                                    .41     10/5.65/.11                                                       12.136   E/VA/GMA  64/30/6.2                  40  1830 181 RA-55                                    .82     10/4.60/.18                                                       11.637   E/VA/GMA  68/31/0.9                  105 1830 176 RA-55                                    .08     14/5.40/.027                                                       11.038   E/VA/GMA  65/33/2.0                  90  1830 177 RA-55                                    .11     14/5.46/.058                                                       11.339   E/VA/AGE  66/33/0.7                  230 1830 170 RA-55                                    .25     14/5.53/.124                                                       11.240   E/MVE.sup.(4) /GMA          66/26/8.1                  1200                      1700 160 RA-55                                    .23     ˜2/4.1/.08                                                       11.9__________________________________________________________________________ LUP 80 = t-Butyl Peroxyisobutyrate RA-55 = 2-t-Butyl Azo-2-Cyano-4-Methoxy-4-Methyl Pentane RA-70 = 2-t-Butyl Azo-2-Cyano-4-Methyl Pentane .sup.(1) allyl glycidyl ether .sup.(2) lbs./M lbs. of polymer .sup.(3) methyl acrylate .sup.(4) methyl vinyl ether 
    
     CONTROL EXAMPLE 1 AND EXAMPLES 41 to 49 
     Blends of phenolic resins, based on a 50/50 blend of wood flour and a two-step (novalak) phenolic resin, were made. 8 parts of hexamethylenetetramine were added in the blending step to provide a cure catalyst. All blends contain 40% wood flour for comparative purposes. The polymer of this invention was added to replace a portion of the phenolic, except for Control Example 1 where additional amount of the novalak phenolic resin was used in place of the tetrapolymer of the present invention. Bars 1/8&#34;×1/2&#34;×5&#34; were molded at 100° C. and cured at 160° C. for 10 minutes. 
     From the results shown in Table III, it can be seen that one can obtain a higher tensile strength and higher flexural strain at failure with only a minor decrease in modulus (Example 41); or one can obtain a marked increase in flexural strain at failure, a large reduction in modulus with a relatively minor decrease in flexural strength (Example 42 to 49). 
     
                                           TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________               Flexural                     Flexural                           FlexuralExample       Additive,               Modulus                     Strength                           Strain atNumberAdditive Type         Amount, %               ×10.sup.-3 psi                     ×10.sup.-3 psi                           Failure, %__________________________________________________________________________Control 1(Phenolic)         (20)  1100  13    1.241   Tetrapolymer of         20    800   14.5  1.9Example 2842   Tetrapolymer of         20    320   10    4.5Example 2643   Tetrapolymer of         20    230   6.6   3.9Example 3044   Terpolymer of         20    290   6.9   3.3Example 3145   Terpolymer of         20    270   6.9   3.8Example 3246   Terpolymer of         20    430   6.2   1.5Example 3747   Terpolymer of         20    250   5.7   3.2Example 3848   Terpolymer of         20    350   5.3   1.8Example 3949   Terpolymer of         20    220   5.8   3.8Example 40__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     CONTROL EXAMPLE 2 AND EXAMPLES 50 to 54 
     Blends of phenolic resin containing wood flour similar to Examples 41 and 42 were molded into 1/8&#34; thick plaques and cured as previously described. The plaques were tested by a falling dart weighing 1/4 lb. (Gardner Tester) to determine the height at which a crack appeared on the reverse side of the plaque. The results in Table IV show that the energy to break can be increased 2-3 fold, or more, depending on the structure of the polymer added. 
     
                       TABLE IV______________________________________                            EnergyExample               Additive   to BreakNumber   Additive Type                 Amount, %  Inch - Pounds______________________________________Control 2    (Phenolic)   (25)       1.250       Tetrapolymer 25         2.3    of Example 2851       Tetrapolymer 25         3.2    of Example 2652       Tetrapolymer 25         5.5    of Example 3053       Terpolymer   25         5.5    of Example 3154       Terpolymer    of Example 32______________________________________ 
    
     CONTROL EXAMPLE 3 AND EXAMPLES 55 to 59 
     A commercial grade of a phenolic resin is compounded specifically with medium length glass fiber filler and various additives for use in electrical applications. This composition is coded Durez® 23570. Three tetrapolymers and two terpolymers were added to be 20 percent of the total composition. For comparison, 20 percent of a pure novalak phenolic resin was added to provide a control having the same amount of filler and additives. Samples were molded, cured and tested for electrical properties. In Table V it is shown that the electrical properties are not seriously impaired. The volume resistivity, however, is improved at least 5-fold. 
     
                                           TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________           ADDITIVE                  ARC.sup.(1)                          VOLUME.sup.(2)                                      BREAKDOWN.sup.(3)EXAMPLE  ADDITIVE AMOUNT RESISTANCE                          RESISTIVITY VOLTAGENUMBER TYPE     %      SECONDS ×10.sup.11 OHM-METERS                                      VOLTS/MIL__________________________________________________________________________Control 3  (phenolic)           20     108     0.23        107255     Tetrapolymer of           20      81     14.5        1105  Example 2856     Tetrapolymer of           20     140     2.2         1051  Example 2657     Tetrapolymer of           20     119     2.5         1076  Example 3058     Terpolymer of           20     101     8.1         1025  Example 3159     Terpolymer of           20     107     1.2          994  Example 32__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.(1) Tungsten electrodes .sup.(2) ASTM D257 .sup.(3) ASTM D149 - Samples about 0.040 inch thick 
    
     EXAMPLES 60 to 62 
     Elastomeric, cured products can be made when the phenolic resin is less than 50% of the blend. Examples of such behavior are given in Table VI. Note that the % elongation to failure is 100-200%, and the elastic recovery of this elongation after failure is about 90%. 
     
                                           TABLE VI__________________________________________________________________________                                    Elonga-                                         % Re-                        Stiffness                               Tensile                                    tion at                                         covery  Phenolic Resin  Additive                        100% Secant                               Strength,                                    Break,                                         AfterExample No.  Used    Additive Type                  Amount, %                        Modulus, psi                               psi  %    30 Min.__________________________________________________________________________60     Durez® 14000          Tetrapolymer                  60    2710   3320 110  89          of Example 261     Durez® 14000          Tetrapolymer                  70    1540   2800 150  93          of Example 262     Durez® 14000          Tetrapolymer                  80     740   1960 190  92          of Example 2__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     CONTROL EXAMPLE 4 AND EXAMPLES 63 to 45 
     A commercial epoxy resin is filled with glass fibers and pelletized for injection molding uses (Fiberite® E 2748). Blends were made and evaluated as shown in Table VII. 
     
                                           TABLE VII__________________________________________________________________________                                        Izod                Flexural                      Flexural                            Flexural    Impact          Additive                Modulus                      Strength                            Strain to                                  %     StrengthExample No.  Additive Type          Amount, %                ×10.sup.-3 psi                      ×10.sup.-3 psi                            Failure, %                                  Recovery                                        Ft-lb/Inch__________________________________________________________________________Control 4  --      None  1,440 16.2  1.1   100   0.3963     Tetrapolymer          20    400   4.8   1.3   97    0.42  of Example 2864     Tetrapolymer          20    210   5.0   3.8   90    --  of Example 2665     Tetrapolymer          25    150   3.4   4.1   --    0.95  of Example 26__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     CONTROL EXAMPLE 5 AND EXAMPLES 66 to 69 
     Blends were made on a 2-roll mill using a glass-filled two-step phenolic resin (Durez® 23570). The resin contained sufficient catalyst for cure. Control Example 5 contained 20 percent of an unfilled phenolic resin so that all examples contain the same amount of glass filler. The polymers of this invention were added at the 20 percent level. Bars were molded at 100° C. and cured at 160° C. before testing. 
     From the results in Table VIII it can be seen that a desirable reduction in stiffness, a marked increase in flexural strain to failure, and a remarkable increase in impact strength can be obtained. 
     
                                           TABLE VIII__________________________________________________________________________                Flexural                      Flexural                            Flexural                                 IzodExample         Additive                Modulus                      Strength                            Strain to                                 Impact/StrengthNumberAdditive Type           Amount                ×10.sup.-3 psi                      ×10.sup.-3 psi                            Failure                                 Ft-lb/inch__________________________________________________________________________Control 5(phenolic) 20%  1400  14.7  1.2  0.2066   Terpolymer of Ex. 33           20%  169   5.0   7.2  1.467   Terpolymer of Ex. 34           20%  73    2.7   8.0  1.668   Terpolymer of Ex. 35           20%  60    2.9   9.7  1.369   Terpolymer of Ex. 36           20%  124   4.9   5.8  1.1__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     CONTROL EXAMPLE 6 AND EXAMPLES 70 to 74 
     Blends were made on a 2-roll mill using a glass-fiber filled phenolic resin FM 1005 produced by the Fiberite Corporation. All examples contain 20 percent of the additive, including Control Example 6 so that all samples contain the same amount of the glass-fiber filler. Bars were molded at 100° C. and cured at 160° C. before testing. 
     From the results in Table IX it can be seen that one can obtain a combined increase in flexural strength, strain to failure and impact toughness if desired or a major increase in strain to failure and impact toughness at the expense of flexural modulus and flexural strength depending on the structure of the additive. 
     
                                           TABLE IX__________________________________________________________________________                       Flexural        Addi-             Flexural                  Flexural                       Strain                            Izod        tive Modulus,                  Strength,                       To   ImpactExampleAdditive        Amount             psi  psi  Failure                            StrengthNumberType    %    ×10.sup.-3                  ×10.sup.-3                       %    Ft-Lb/inch__________________________________________________________________________Control 6Phenolic        20   1580 12.8 0.95 0.1670   Example 28        20   920  14.6 1.9  0.2671   Example 26        20   160  5.8  5.5  1.472   Tetrapolymer of        20    87  3.0  6.0  1.5Example 3073   Terpolymer of        20   106  3.2  6.0  2.1Example 3174   Terpolymer of        20   169  4.9  5.5  1.7Example 32__________________________________________________________________________