Abstract:
The invention deals with the manufacture of fully segmented sabots used inhe launching of subcaliber projectiles. The prior method required the machining of individual sabot segments and fitting them on to the sub-projectile. The improvement involves the casting of the sabot segments with the shimmed sub-projectile pre-positioned in a mold.

Description:
GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST 
     The invention described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment to us of any royalty thereon. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The prior art method of manufacturing saboted projectiles was to first make the sabot segments and then assemble them on the sub-projectile. The sabot segments always required expensive and relatively precise machining; this precision being essential since force transmitting matching surfaces are involved. The intricate geometric designs preclude reasonable quality control of the critical matching surfaces. The prior art method also made mass production difficult, tolerance controls created problems in matching and fitting of segments and hence adversely influenced performance. This invention eliminates the disadvantages discussed above. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention eliminates the need for precision machining of sabot segments prior to assembly on the subprojectile. By utilization of an appropriately designed mold with two or more shims located in the cavity between the subprojectile and the mold, the sabot segments are cast in place around the sub-projectile. In this manner proper fit and dimensional control are insured. The cast material may be a metal such as an aluminum or a magnesium alloy. Alternatively, reinforced or unreinforced plastics may be used. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a side view with a partial section of a saboted sub-projectile or penetrator. 
     FIG. 2 is cross-sectional view taken along line 2--2 of FIG. 1. 
     FIG. 3 is a side view of a portion of the sub-projectile. 
     FIG. 4 is a side view of a shim. 
     FIG. 5 is an isometric view of a portion of the assembly of shims and spacing jig on the sub-projectile. 
     FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the assembly shown in FIG. 5 in a casting mold. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     As shown in FIG. 1, a sub-projectile including a penetrator with fins and windshield has been saboted and is ready for loading or packing. Sub-projectile 10 is encased with four sabot segments 11, also shown in FIG. 2. As further detailed in FIG. 3, the sub-projectile 10 has grooves 12 which may be produced by rolling, machining or grinding with the material typically being a tungsten-steel alloy or a depleted uranium alloy. Alternatively, the sub-projectile 10 may be composed of other alloys or composite type materials. 
     In the cast-in-place method of the present invention, sabot segments 11 are achieved by the introduction of shims 13 during the casting process and effective use of mold release agents such as graphite or whiting for metal castings, and zinc stearate powder, mineral oil or teflon for plastics on at least one side of each shim 13. The shims 13 may be stamped from an appropriate thin sheet of metal. The metal may be made of a material such as steel and of a thickness such that it resists distortion when subjected to the temperatures of the molten sabot metal aforementioned. The inner edge of the shims need only approximate the profile of the sub-projectile to be effective thereby minimizing their production cost. 
     As shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the shims 13 are held in place by a jig 15 at the rearward end 23 of the sub-projectile 10 and a jig 16 at the forward end 24 of projectile 10. Simple means such as slots 17 can be used to properly space the shims 13. Jigs 15 and 16 may be composed of such material as cast iron or steel in order to sustain repeated usage. Those surfaces coming in contact with the molten sabot metal would also be coated with a release agent such as aforementioned. The jigged assembly of FIG. 5 is then placed in a split outer mold 18 and 18&#39; constructed of a cast iron or steel. The use of sand molds or die casting methods well known in the art may also be used. As with the aforementioned components, a mold release agent may be used on the inner surfaces 25 of the permanent metallic molds 18 and 18&#39;. Conventional mold openings 19 are also shown in FIG. 6 for pouring and bleeding of air during the casting process. The mold design shown in FIG. 6 is one of a number of possibilities, all well known by those skilled in the art. 
     The sabot castings may be made with alloys of aluminum or magnesium. However, use of non-metallics, such as liquid plastic, including reinforced composites such as liquid reinforced plastic may be used with the afore-described process. In addition, pressure molding or injection molding may have application here. 
     In operation, after the split molds 18 and 18&#39; are operatively closed and upon completion of the pouring of the molten sabot material into the mold openings 19, the assembly is allowed to cool. The mold is then stripped from the saboted sub-projectile 10. The jigs 15 and 16 are then removed from the rough cast sabot 11 and sub-projectile 10 which is then made ready for final finishing. The rough cast sabot 11 and sub-projectile 10 are then placed in a conventional lathe or automated lathe and the external surface of the sabot segments and shims machined to the final design configuration. Conventional type clamp means may be temporarily used to prevent the sabot segments from coming apart during machining. With accurate casting, the machining step quite possibly may not be necessary. At this stage, other components such as bands 20 and 21 and fins 22 may be added. 
     The method described above has the potential of significant cost reduction and more uniform behavior of the mass produced item, although some potential performance penalties from casting are anticipated. The latter aspect is due to the inherent differences between peak strength and toughness of cast materials vs. the similar properties for extruded or forged materials. The different properties can, of course, be accommodated in a rational, optimal design methodology; the final design of a structure fabricated from the cast material will, in general, be different from its extruded counterpart. The situation is such, however, that only mass producible items may be acceptable for reasons of economy: in this case any necessary additional parasitic mass must be tolerated to achieve the substantial economic benefits accrued from cast sabots.