Abstract:
A technique for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity is disclosed. In one exemplary embodiment, a method for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity may comprise measuring an ion beam density distribution in an ion beam. The method may also comprise calculating an ion dose distribution across a predetermined region of a workpiece that results from a scan velocity profile, wherein the scan velocity profile comprises a first component and a second component that control a relative movement between the ion beam and the workpiece in a first direction and a second direction respectively, and wherein the ion dose distribution is based at least in part on the ion beam density distribution. The method may further comprise adjusting at least one of the first component and the second component of the scan velocity profile to achieve a desired ion dose distribution in the predetermined region of the workpiece.

Description:
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE 
   The present disclosure relates generally to ion implantation and, more particularly, to a technique for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity. 
   BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE 
   Ion implantation is a process of depositing chemical species into a substrate by direct bombardment of the substrate with energized ions. In semiconductor fabrication, ion implanters are used primarily for doping processes that alter the type and level of conductivity of target materials. A precise doping profile in an integrated circuit (IC) substrate is often crucial for proper IC performance. To achieve a desired doping profile, one or more ion species may be implanted in different doses, at different energies and different incident angles. 
   In production ion implanters, an ion beam is typically of a smaller size than a target wafer, which necessitates either scanning of the ion beam, scanning of the wafer, or a combination thereof. Scanning an ion beam typically refers to movement of the ion beam to increase wafer area that can be implanted, while scanning a wafer typically refers to the relative movement of a wafer through an ion beam. As used hereinafter, “scanning” refers to the relative movement of an ion beam with respect to a wafer or substrate surface. The ion beam is typically either a “ribbon beam” having a rectangular cross section or a “spot beam” having an approximately circular or elliptical cross section. For purpose of the present disclosure, a ribbon beam may be either a static ribbon beam or a scanned ribbon beam which is created by scanning a spot beam at a high frequency. In the case of a ribbon beam with a dimension larger than the wafer diameter, ion implantation of the wafer may be achieved by keeping the ribbon beam stationary and simultaneously moving the wafer across the ribbon beam in a direction orthogonal to the longer dimension of the ribbon beam. The one-dimensional (1-D) movement of the wafer may cause the ribbon beam to cover the entire wafer surface. In the case of a spot beam, scanning of a wafer may be achieved by sweeping the spot beam back and forth between two endpoints to form a scan path and by simultaneously moving the wafer across the scan path. 
   Sweeping of an ion beam may be accomplished through the use of electrostatic scanners or magnetic scanners, wherein the ion beam is controllably deflected from its normal trajectory to span a larger area by changing the electric or magnetic fields respectively in a direction orthogonal to the direction of travel of the ion beam. The strength of the scanner field determines the total deflection from the normal path of the ion beam, hence the ion beam may be scanned by changing the field strength of the scanner elements. The movement of the wafer across the scan path may be either continuous or incremental. 
   During ion implantation, it is desirable to achieve a uniform ion dose or beam current profile along the scan path. The process of tuning the ion implanter system to achieve the uniform ion dose or beam current profile is called “uniformity tuning.” Existing uniformity tuning techniques typically follow one of three approaches. 
   A first approach is to scan a spot beam across a wafer plane while moving the target wafer through the scan path at a constant velocity. In this first approach, improvement of dose uniformity is achieved by only tuning a beam scan velocity profile. Since the beam current distribution within the spot beam typically has a Gaussian-like non-uniform profile, it is often necessary to scan the spot beam off the wafer edges in order to avoid current fall-off at either end of the scan path. As a result, a significant fraction of the available beam current is lost due to overscan of the ion beam. 
   A second approach is to scan a target wafer through a stationary ion beam. If the ion beam cross section is smaller than the wafer diameter, the wafer is scanned in two directions with constant velocity in one direction and a step size in the other direction. This approach is known in the art as “2-D mechanical scan.” In this second approach, the wafer requires multiple passes in the first direction through the ion beam, and an optimized step size in the second (orthogonal) direction, which causes the ion implanter to operate at a low throughput. In addition, since the ion beam is typically non-uniform, the best possible uniformity achieved with the second approach is limited by the step size between the passes and the velocity in the first direction. 
   A third approach is to have a stationary ribbon beam that spans a distance larger than the wafer diameter, such that the wafer may be scanned across the ribbon beam to get a desired dose. The desired dose uniformity on the wafer is limited by the uniformity of the ion beam density distribution in the ribbon beam since the wafer is typically scanned at constant velocity. However, tuning the ribbon beam for a desired uniformity may be cumbersome and time consuming, thus may negatively impact the ion implanter&#39;s throughput. 
   In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide a technique for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity which overcomes the above-described inadequacies and shortcomings. 
   SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE 
   A technique for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity is disclosed. In one particular exemplary embodiment, the technique may be realized as a method for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity. The method may comprise measuring an ion beam density distribution in an ion beam. The method may also comprise calculating an ion dose distribution across a predetermined region of a workpiece that results from a scan velocity profile, wherein the scan velocity profile comprises a first component and a second component that control a relative movement between the ion beam and the workpiece in a first direction and a second direction respectively, and wherein the ion dose distribution is based at least in part on the ion beam density distribution. The method may further comprise adjusting at least one of the first component and the second component of the scan velocity profile to achieve a desired ion dose distribution in the predetermined region of the workpiece. 
   In accordance with other aspects of this particular exemplary embodiment, the first direction may be a beam scan direction, and the first component may be a beam scan velocity profile. The second direction may be a wafer scan direction, and the second component may be a wafer scan velocity profile. 
   In accordance with further aspects of this particular exemplary embodiment, the method may further comprise performing ion implantation according to the adjusted scan velocity profile. 
   In accordance with additional aspects of this particular exemplary embodiment, the desired ion dose distribution may comprise a uniform distribution pattern in the predetermined region. Alternatively, the desired ion dose distribution may comprise a radial distribution pattern in the predetermined region. Or, the desired ion dose distribution may comprise a distribution pattern in the predetermined region that is configurable to improve device yield based on process variations during ion implantation. 
   In accordance with another aspect of this particular exemplary embodiment, the scan velocity profile may further comprise a third component that controls one or more rotations of the workpiece to achieve one or more orientations of the workpiece during ion implantation. At least one of the first component and the second component of the scan velocity profile may be adjusted after at least one rotation of the workpiece. At least one of the first component and the second component of the scan velocity profile may be dynamically adjusted for at least one orientation of the workpiece. The third component may comprise a rotation mode selected from a group consisting of: a single-step mode involving no rotation of the workpiece, a 2-step mode involving two rotations of the workpiece, a quad-mode involving four rotations of the workpiece, and an 8-step mode involving eight rotations of the workpiece. The rotation mode may be selected to improve beam utilization and hence the ion implanter throughput. 
   In accordance with yet another aspect of this particular exemplary embodiment, the method may further comprise adjusting an ion beam profile over the predetermined region in the first direction and adjusting the second component of the scan velocity profile. The ion beam profile may be adjusted by changing a scan distance of the ion beam in at least one of the first direction and the second direction. The ion beam profile may be adjusted by changing at least one of the first component and the second component of the scan velocity profile. The ion beam profile may be adjusted in at least one of the first direction and the second direction to make the ion beam profile more symmetric with respect to a center of the ion beam profile. The ion beam profile may be adjusted in at least one of the first direction and the second direction to make the ion beam profile more asymmetric with respect to a center of the ion beam profile. 
   In accordance with still another aspect of this particular exemplary embodiment, the method may further comprise the steps of: selecting a workpiece rotation mode based on whether an ion beam profile in the first direction has a predominantly symmetric or asymmetric component in the first direction; adjusting the first component of the scan velocity profile to further enhance the predominantly symmetric or asymmetric component; and adjusting, based on the adjusted first component and the selected workpiece rotation mode, the second component of the scan velocity profile to achieve the desired ion dose distribution. The method may further comprise selecting a 2-step workpiece rotation mode if the ion beam profile has a predominantly symmetric component, wherein the workpiece is rotated by −90° and +90°. The method may further comprise selecting a 2-step workpiece rotation mode if the ion beam profile has a predominantly asymmetric component, wherein the workpiece is rotated by 180°. Or, the method may further comprise selecting a 4-step workpiece rotation mode if the ion beam profile has a predominantly asymmetric component, wherein the workpiece is rotated by 90° in each step. 
   In accordance with a further aspect of this particular exemplary embodiment, the first direction may be perpendicular to the second direction. 
   In accordance with yet a further aspect of this particular exemplary embodiment, the ion beam may be a ribbon beam, and an ion beam profile in the first direction may be adjusted by tuning one or more beamline elements to change a spatial distribution of beamlets within the ribbon beam. Alternatively, the ion beam may be a stationary spot beam, and wherein the scan velocity profile causes a 2-D mechanical scan of the wafer through the stationary spot beam. The first component of the scan velocity profile may cause the wafer to move at a variable speed in the first direction, and the second component of the scan velocity profile may comprise a variable scan pitch. 
   In another particular exemplary embodiment, the techniques may be realized as at least one signal embodied in at least one carrier wave for transmitting a computer program of instructions configured to be readable by at least one processor for instructing the at least one processor to execute a computer process for performing the method as recited above. 
   In yet another particular exemplary embodiment, the techniques may be realized as at least one processor readable carrier for storing a computer program of instructions configured to be readable by at least one processor for instructing the at least one processor to execute a computer process for performing the method as recited above. 
   In still another particular exemplary embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a system for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity. The system may comprise a processor unit in communication with a scan controller of an ion implanter, wherein the scan controller is configured to cause an ion beam to scan across a predetermined region of a workpiece. The system may also comprise a measurement interface coupled to the processor unit and the ion implanter. The processor unit may be adapted to: measure an ion beam density distribution in an ion beam; calculate an ion dose distribution across a predetermined region of a workpiece that results from a scan velocity profile, wherein the scan velocity profile comprises a first component and a second component that control a relative movement between the ion beam and the workpiece in a first direction and a second direction respectively, and wherein the ion dose distribution is based at least in part on the ion beam density distribution; and adjust at least one of the first component and the second component of the scan velocity profile to achieve a desired ion dose distribution in the predetermined region of the workpiece. 
   The present disclosure will now be described in more detail with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof as shown in the accompanying drawings. While the present disclosure is described below with reference to exemplary embodiments, it should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited thereto. Those of ordinary skill in the art having access to the teachings herein will recognize additional implementations, modifications, and embodiments, as well as other fields of use, which are within the scope of the present disclosure as described herein, and with respect to which the present disclosure may be of significant utility. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     In order to facilitate a fuller understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the accompanying drawings, in which like elements are referenced with like numerals. These drawings should not be construed as limiting the present disclosure, but are intended to be exemplary only. 
       FIG. 1  shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
       FIG. 2  shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for determining a beam scan distance in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates ion beam overscan and parameters associated with beam utilization in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
       FIG. 4  shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for calculating a beam scan velocity profile in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
       FIG. 5  shows a block diagram illustrating an exemplary system for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
       FIG. 6  illustrates an exemplary method for improving ion implantation involving a ribbon beam in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
       FIG. 7  illustrates an exemplary method for improving ion implantation involving a 2-D mechanical scan of a wafer through a spot beam in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS 
   Embodiments of the present disclosure may improve ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity by combining the shaping of an ion beam profile with the tuning of a wafer scan velocity profile. An ion beam to which the technique described herein may be applicable may be either a stationary ion beam or a scanned ion beam. An orthogonal scan compensation (OSC) mode may be chosen based on a symmetry characteristic of the ion beam profile, and a symmetry characteristic of the ion beam profile may be further enhanced for the chosen OSC mode. The OSC technique recognizes the fact that a wafer can be implanted in multiple passes through an ion beam and a rotation of the wafer between passes provides an additional degree of freedom to achieve the desired dose distribution on the wafer. The ion implantation throughput may also be improved by imposing a desired beam utilization value and/or by choosing an OSC mode involving fewer rotation steps. 
   Referring to  FIG. 1 , there is shown a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
   In step  102 , a spot beam may be measured. The measurement may involve measuring a stationary spot beam at a center spot of a region of interest (ROI) or a target wafer. The measurement may also involve measuring a current profile and/or dose profile produced by scanning the spot beam across the ROI.  FIG. 3  shows a spot beam  304  being scanned across a target wafer (or ROI)  302  between two endpoints  31  and  32 . A scan path  30  may be formed by scanning the spot beam  304  in the ±X directions. The stationary spot beam may have a Gaussian-like non-uniform current or dose distribution, such as a profile  32 , which is denoted “I 0 (x).” As indicated in the profile  32 , the spot beam  304  may have a half width of W. The current profile and/or dose profile resulting from the scanned spot beam  304  may be referred to as an “ion beam profile.” In  FIG. 3 , a current profile  34  I(x) is shown. 
   In step  104 , a desired beam utilization value may be set and a scan distance may be determined based on the desired beam utilization value. As shown in  FIG. 3 , the spot beam  304  may be overscanned, that is, scanned at least partially off the wafer edges (i.e., x=−R and x=+R). As a result, a small fraction of the beam current is lost. The ratio between the accumulated beam current on the wafer (i.e., the amount of beam current actually used for ion implantation) and the total beam current accumulated during a full scan is referred to as “beam utilization.” Referring to the beam current profile I(x) in  FIG. 3 , the shadowed area  35  beyond the left edge of the wafer  302  and the shadowed area  36  beyond the right edge represent inside (left) utilization loss and outside (right) utilization loss. 
     FIG. 2  shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for determining a beam scan distance in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In describing this exemplary process, references will continue to be made to  FIG. 3 . 
   In step  202 , the process for determining the beam scan distance starts. 
   In step  204 , a total beam current over the ROI, i.e., I_Total, may be calculated based on the beam current profile I(x). 
   In step  206 , an inside utilization loss (Util_Inside) and an outside utilization loss (Util_Outside) may be selected, for example, by an operator of an ion implanter. For maximum beam utilization (and hence highest tool throughput), these losses should ideally be minimized, i.e., set to zero. However in practice, it may be difficult to have 100% beam utilization due to uniformity constraints or other closed loop control requirements. 
   In step  208 , a total beam utilization Util_Total may be calculated as:
 
Util_Total=1−(Util_Outside+Util_Outside)
 
   In step  210 , the location of the left edge of the scanned beam, LE, may be determined based on the following equation: 
   
     
       
         
           Util_Inside 
           = 
           
             
               
                 ∫ 
                 
                   - 
                   ∞ 
                 
                 LE 
               
               ⁢ 
               
                 
                   I 
                   ⁡ 
                   
                     ( 
                     x 
                     ) 
                   
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                     
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                   ⅆ 
                   x 
                 
               
             
             I_Total 
           
         
       
     
   
   In step  212 , based on the location of the left edge, the inside overscan may be calculated as: 
   
     
       
         
           a 
           = 
           
             
               
                 - 
                 LE 
               
               - 
               R 
               - 
               W 
             
             W 
           
         
       
     
   
   Similarly, in step  214 , the location of the right edge of the scanned beam, RE, may be determined based on the following equation: 
   
     
       
         
           Util_Outside 
           = 
           
             
               
                 ∫ 
                 RE 
                 ∞ 
               
               ⁢ 
               
                 
                   I 
                   ⁡ 
                   
                     ( 
                     x 
                     ) 
                   
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                     
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                   ⅆ 
                   x 
                 
               
             
             I_Total 
           
         
       
     
   
   In step  216 , based on the location of the right edge, the outside overscan may be calculated as: 
   
     
       
         
           b 
           = 
           
             
               RE 
               - 
               R 
               - 
               W 
             
             W 
           
         
       
     
   
   The process for determining the scan distance may then end in step  218 . 
   Referring back to  FIG. 1 , in step  106 , a beam scan velocity profile may be calculated to shape the beam current profile I(x).  FIG. 4  shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for calculating a beam scan velocity profile in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. 
   In step  402 , the process for calculating beam scan velocity profile starts. 
   In step  404 , odd and even components of the beam current profile I(x) may be determined. The odd component of the beam current profile I(x) may be denoted I odd (x) and the even component may be denoted I even (X), wherein 
           Ieven   =       (       I   ⁡     (   x   )       +     I   ⁡     (     -   x     )         )     /   2                 Iodd   =       (       I   ⁡     (   x   )       -     I   ⁡     (     -   x     )         )     /   2           
and wherein
   I ( x )= I even( x )+ I odd( x ) 
As so defined, I even (x) may represent a symmetric component of the beam current I(x) while I odd (X) may represent an asymmetric component. The symmetric characteristics are with respect to the point x=0. By definition, I even (x) and I odd (X) satisfy the following equations, respectively:
 
   
     
       
         
           
             Ieven 
             ⁡ 
             
               ( 
               
                 - 
                 x 
               
               ) 
             
           
           = 
           
             Ieven 
             ⁡ 
             
               ( 
               x 
               ) 
             
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
             Iodd 
             ⁡ 
             
               ( 
               
                 - 
                 x 
               
               ) 
             
           
           = 
           
             - 
             
               Iodd 
               ⁡ 
               
                 ( 
                 x 
                 ) 
               
             
           
         
       
     
   
   In step  406 , it may be determined whether the beam current profile I(x) has a predominantly symmetric or asymmetric component. One way to make such a determination may be to compare standard deviations, σ(I even ) and σ(I odd ), which are associated with I even (x) and I odd (x) respectively. A user designated threshold value may be used in this comparison. It should be noted that, although a threshold value of 0.5 is used herein, other threshold values may also be chosen. 
   If it is determined that 
               σ   ⁡     (   Ieven   )         σ   ⁡     (   Iodd   )         ≤   0.5         
then, in step  408 , the asymmetric feature of the beam current profile may be further enhanced, for example, by minimizing the standard deviation σ(I even ). According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, microslopes in the beam scan velocity profile may be adjusted to minimize σ(I even ). Next, in step  410 , it may be decided that the beam profile is predominantly asymmetric and a constant starting velocity profile may be used for orthogonal scan compensation (OSC). This solution for the velocity profile results from the fact that, if the scanned beam profile is completely asymmetric (e.g., a linear variation from one side to another), a 180° rotation between passes through the beam completely balance out the dose variation introduced in each pass. Thus, although the individual passes contribute a non-uniform dose (linearly varying dose) across the wafer, the sum of doses from the two rotations may still be perfectly uniform. Typically, for a predominantly asymmetric beam profile, a two-step OSC mode wherein the wafer is rotated 180° or a four-step OSC mode wherein the wafer is rotated 90° in each step may be chosen.
 
   If it is determined in step  406  that 
               σ   ⁡     (   Ieven   )         σ   ⁡     (   Iodd   )         &gt;   0.5         
then, in step  412 , the symmetric feature of the beam current profile may be further enhanced, for example, by minimizing the standard deviation σ(I odd ). According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, microslopes in the beam scan velocity profile may be adjusted to minimize σ(I odd ). Next, in step  414 , it may be decided that the beam profile is predominantly symmetric and a bi-mode starting velocity profile may be used for orthogonal scan compensation (OSC). That is, a velocity profile that is obtained for a two-step (90° rotation each) OSC mode may be used as a starting point for determining the solution for the four-step OSC mode. The reason for this approach is computational efficiency in finding a numerical solution for the velocity profile from a better initial guess. The bi-mode problem is easier to solve and takes less computation time since there are only two dose maps corresponding to the two steps that are added to obtain the final dose map. Typically, for a predominantly symmetric beam profile, a two-step OSC mode may be used, wherein the wafer is rotated +/−90°, if the desired uniformity can be obtained to improve throughput. Otherwise, a four-step OSC mode will be used.
 
   In step  416 , the process for calculating the beam scan velocity profile may end. 
   Referring back to  FIG. 1 , in step  108 , the above-calculated beam scan velocity profile may be used as an input to calculate a wafer scan velocity profile such that it produces a desired dose uniformity. The wafer scan velocity may be calculated for suitable OSC modes as determined above. 
   In step  110 , it may be determined whether the resulting dose uniformity is acceptable. If so, an OSC mode may be optionally chosen in step  112  based on throughput considerations. For example, where both a two-step and four-step OSC modes are appropriate, it may be beneficial to choose the two-step OSC mode because the fewer steps may lead to a higher throughput in ion implantation. 
   However, if the resulting uniformity is not acceptable, it may be further determined in step  114  whether the uniformity change from the previous cycle is acceptable. As may be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the step of calculating the beam scan velocity profile and the step of calculating the wafer scan velocity profile may be iterated or recursively repeated in multiple cycles. The uniformity change between two consecutive cycles may be evaluated herein step  114 . If the dose uniformity improves (or at least does not deteriorate too much), the process may loop back to step  106  where the microslopes in the beam scan velocity profile may be further adjusted. If the uniformity change is not acceptable, then, in step  116 , the beam utilization value may be decreased. That is, the scan distance may need to be increased to afford a better chance of reaching an acceptable dose uniformity after the process subsequently loops back to step  106 . 
   Although the exemplary embodiments described so far have focused on a spot beam, it should be noted that the technique for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity in accordance with the present disclosure may also be applied to a ribbon beam in a similar fashion.  FIG. 6  illustrates an exemplary method for improving ion implantation involving a ribbon beam  604  in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. For a ribbon beam  604  that is wider than a target wafer  602 , it may not be necessary to scan the ribbon beam  604  to produce a beam current or ion dose profile. Instead, the beam current or dose profile may be that of the ribbon beam&#39;s intrinsic current or dose distribution, which may be referred to as the ribbon beam profile  606 . The process may start with a determination of the ribbon beam profile  606  as it spans the beam width. Then, it may be determined as to whether the ribbon beam profile  606  has a predominantly symmetric or asymmetric component, and, based on this determination, a wafer rotation mode (OSC mode) may be selected. Next, the ribbon beam  604  may be adjusted (e.g., through beamline tuning) to further enhance the predominantly symmetric or asymmetric component. Based on the adjusted ribbon beam and the selected wafer rotation mode, a wafer scan velocity profile may be calculated, such that, when the target wafer  602  is translated (in Y direction) across the ribbon beam according to the wafer scan velocity profile, the ribbon beam  604  would produce an acceptable ion dose uniformity on the target wafer  602 . 
     FIG. 7  illustrates an exemplary method for improving ion implantation involving a 2-D mechanical scan of a wafer  702  through a spot beam  704  in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The beam profile in the X and Y directions may both be adjusted through variable wafer scan velocity profiles for a given Y-step (or scan pitch). This approach may especially be useful to eliminate a need for small scan pitches to address a micro-uniformity problem wherein the wafer  702  may show horizontal stripes of dose variation due to a non-optimal scan pitch. A 90° rotation of the wafer  702  between two successive passes may eliminate the need to reduce the scan pitch and may improve dose uniformity across the wafer  702 . In addition, the scan pitch may be varied to maximize the throughput. 
     FIG. 5  shows a block diagram illustrating an exemplary system  500  for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The system  500  may comprise a processor unit  502  which may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, personal computer (PC) or any other processing device. The system  500  may also comprise a beam/wafer scan controller  504  that is coupled to an ion implanter system  50  and may control the scanning movement of a wafer and/or an ion beam according to instructions received from the processor unit  502 . The system  500  may further comprise an ion beam measurement interface  506  through which the processor unit  502  may receive measurement data from the ion implanter system  50 . 
   In operation, the processor unit  502  may cause the beam/wafer scan controller  504  to initiate a preliminary scan in the ion implanter system  50 , and may receive ion beam measurements (e.g., ion dose and/or beam current) via the measurement interface  508 . The processor unit  502  may also receive user inputs such as, for example, beam utilization, a threshold value for evaluating beam profile, and uniformity criteria. The processor unit  502  may then select a desired OSC mode, calculate a beam scan velocity profile, and tune a wafer scan velocity profile for dose/current uniformity. 
   At this point it should be noted that the technique for improving ion implantation throughput and dose uniformity in accordance with the present disclosure as described above typically involves the processing of input data and the generation of output data to some extent. This input data processing and output data generation may be implemented in hardware or software. For example, specific electronic components may be employed in an ion implanter or similar or related circuitry for implementing the functions associated with uniformity tuning in accordance with the present disclosure as described above. Alternatively, one or more processors operating in accordance with stored instructions may implement the functions associated with uniformity tuning in accordance with the present disclosure as described above. If such is the case, it is within the scope of the present disclosure that such instructions may be stored on one or more processor readable carriers (e.g., a magnetic disk), or transmitted to one or more processors via one or more signals. 
   The present disclosure is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, other various embodiments of and modifications to the present disclosure, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Thus, such other embodiments and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Further, although the present disclosure has been described herein in the context of a particular implementation in a particular environment for a particular purpose, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that its usefulness is not limited thereto and that the present disclosure may be beneficially implemented in any number of environments for any number of purposes. Accordingly, the claims set forth below should be construed in view of the full breadth and spirit of the present disclosure as described herein.