Abstract:
Polymer blend composition having improved processibility and comprising: 
     (a) a major portion of a difficultly melt-processible polymer, and 
     (b) a minor portion of: 
     (1) at least an effective amount, to improve processibility, of a fluorocarbon copolymer which at the melt-processing temperature of (a) is either in a melted form if crystalline, or is above its glass transition temperature if amorphous, and 
     (2) at least an effective amount, to improve processibility, of at least one tetrafluoroethylene homopolymer or copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and at least one monomer copolymerizable therewith, wherein the mole ratio of fluorine to hydrogen is at least 1:1, and which is solid at the melt-processing temperature of (a); 
     masterbatches comprised of the processing aid; and processes utilizing the processing aid.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
     This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/461,093 filed Jan. 4, 1990 as a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/216,421 filed July 8, 1988 and issued Feb. 27, 1990 as U.S. Pat. No. 4,904,735. Application Ser. No. 07/461,093 was allowed June 1, 1990 and now is abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to a processing aid for polymers, and to polymers having improved processibility, particularly improved extrusion characteristics. 
     2. Background 
     The melt extrusion of high molecular weight polymers, for example, hydrocarbon polymers, into shaped structures such as tubing, pipe, wire coating or film is accomplished by well-known procedures wherein a rotating screw pushes a heated, molten and viscous polymer melt through the extruder barrel into a die in which the polymer is shaped to the desired form and is then subsequently cooled and resolidified, by various means, into the general shape of the die. 
     In order to achieve low production costs it is desirable to extrude at high rates. Although the extrusion rate is readily increased by increasing the rate of revolution of the extruder screw, there is a technical limit to these increases because of the viscoelastic properties of the polymer. At rates above this limit the polymer may be mechanically heated to temperatures at which thermal decomposition can occur, or extrudates with a rough surface are obtained. The latter phenomenon can generate an undesirable pattern on the surface of the extrudate. One way of avoiding this occurrence is to extrude at a higher temperature, but this adds to the processing costs and makes cooling of the extrudate more difficult. More seriously, many polymer resins are already extruded at temperatures near their decomposition temperatures, and further increases are not feasible. 
     Additional examples of poor extrusion behavior include formation of deposits of the extruding polymer resin, degraded polymer resin or resin additives around the die exit (orifice); surging in polymer flow and erratic pressure fluctuations that occur due to uneven pumping of the polymer melt, which may result in erratic fluctuations of output rate; and torquing out of the extruder, that is, overloading the pressure limit of the extruder, resulting in automatic shutdown of the extruder. 
     It is desirable, therefore, to find highly efficient means of increasing the extrusion rate, without raising the melt temperature, while producing products with smooth surfaces. Changes in extruder and die configuration can improve melt flow but are not always practical or economically feasible. Another approach involves the addition of conventional wax-type process aids which reduce bulk viscosity and in some cases improve processing properties. However, the efficiency is marginal and the high levels of additive required often adversely affect other properties. In Blatz, U.S. Pat. No. 3,125,547, it is disclosed that the use of 0.01-2.0 wt. % of a fluorocarbon polymer that is in a fluid state at process temperature, such as a fluoroelastomer, will reduce die pressure and significantly increase the extrusion rate at which melt fracture occurs for high and low density polyethylenes and other polyolefins. It is further taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,125,547 that fluororesins which are solids at process temperature afford little or no improvements in extrusion characteristics of hydrocarbon polymers. By the term solid, it is meant that the fluororesin, if crystalline in nature, is not melted, or, if amorphous in nature, is not above the glass transition temperature. 
     Kamiya and Inui, in Japanese Patent Application Publication Kokoku 45-30574 (1970, examined) cite the use of crystalline fluorocarbon polymers at temperatures below their melting points to eliminate die build-up but say nothing of other extrusion improvements. Nishida, Tate and Kitani, in Japanese Patent Application Publication Kokai 62-64847, disclose injection molding compositions comprising an ethylene/alpha olefin copolymer having an MFR of 0.2-200 g/10 min., a density of 0.850-0.945 g/cm 3 , and a Q value of 2.5-12, and 0.001-1% by weight of a fluorinated hydrocarbon polymer having an F/C ratio of at least 1:2. 
     Chu, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,740,341, discloses blends having improved extrudability and comprising a linear polymer of ethylene having incorporated therein 0.01-0.5 wt. %, based on the composition, of a fluorocarbon polymer having an F/C ratio of at least 1:2 and which is fluid at 120-300° C., and 0.01-0.5 wt. %, based on the composition, of a polysiloxane. 
     Larsen, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,334,157, discloses polyethylene which has been modified to improve its optical properties by incorporating therein 0.015 to greater than 1.7% by wt., based on the mixture, of finely divided polytetrafluoroethylene. 
     It is an object of this invention to provide resin compositions with substantially improved extrusion characteristics. It is another object to provide polymers which can be extruded at high rates to give extrudates of high surface quality. It is yet another object to provide polymers that can be extruded at low die pressures and at low melt temperatures. Another object is to provide a processing aid by means of which all the above can be achieved. A further object is to provide masterbatches of the processing aid. Other objects will become apparent hereinafter. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention provides a processing aid composition for difficultly melt-processible polymers. The processing aid consists essentially of, with the parts totaling 100: 
     (a) 2-95 parts by weight of a fluorocarbon copolymer which at the melt-processing temperature of the difficultly melt-processible polymer is either in a melted form if crystalline or is above its glass transition temperature if amorphous; and 
     (b) 98-5 parts by weight of a tetrafluoroethylene homopolymer or copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and a monomer which is copolymerizable therewith, wherein the mole ratio of fluorine to hydrogen is at least 1:1, and which is solid at the melt-processing temperature of the difficultly melt-processible polymer. 
     The processing aid composition consists essentially of a minor portion of the processing aid and a major portion of a polymer, either a melt-processible or difficultly melt-processible polymer, or both, for example, a hydrocarbon polymer. 
     The present invention also provides a polymer blend composition having improved processibility and which comprises: 
     (a) a major portion of a difficultly melt-processible polymer, the host polymer, and 
     (b) a minor portion of: 
     (1) at least an effective amount to improve processibility, preferably to about 0.5 wt. %, based on the weight of (a), more preferably 0.002-0.20 wt. %, of a fluorocarbon copolymer wherein, preferably, the mole ratio of fluorine to hydrogen is at least 1:1.5, which at the melt-processing temperature of (a) is either in a melted form if crystalline, or is above its glass transition temperature if amorphous, and 
     (2) at least an effective amount to improve processibility, preferably 0.002-0.20 wt. %, based on the weight of (a), of at least one tetrafluoroethylene homopolymer or copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and at least one monomer copolymerizable therewith, wherein the mole ratio of fluorine to hydrogen is at least 1:1, and which is solid at the melt-processing temperature of (a). 
     For example, when the host polYmer (a) is a hYdrocarbon polymer, its melt-processing temperature generally will be in the range 100-250° C. 
     Finally, the invention provides masterbatches containing the aforesaid processing aid; it provides processes for facilitating the processing of difficultly melt-processible polymers; and it provides difficultly melt-processible polymers containing the processing aid. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING 
     The figures which are a part of this specification are plots of die pressure (MPa) vs throughput (g/minute), showing the superior results achieved by means of this invention, as compared to those achieved by means of the prior art. 
     FIG. 1 is representative of the invention as applied to a difficultly-melt-processible polyethylene, as described in Example 1 and Comparative Examples 1, 2 and 3. 
     FIG. 2 is similarly representative for polystyrene, as described in Example 14. 
     FIG. 3 is similarly representative for an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer, as described in Example 15. 
     FIG. 4 is similarly representative for polyester, as described in Example 16. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     In accordance with the present invention it has been discovered, surprisingly, that for the improvement of extrusion behavior, difficultly melt-processible polymers which contain combinations of fluorocarbon polymers (hereinafter called type (1) fluorocarbon polymers) that are above their melting points if crystalline, or above their glass transition temperatures if amorphous, and are thus molten and fluid at the polymer-processing temperatures, and crystalline or amorphous fluorocarbon polymers (herinafter called type (2) fluorocarbon polymers) that are solid at the polymer melt-processing temperatures, have significant advantage over such difficultly melt-processible polymers which contain equivalent, or even greater, amounts of extrusion-modifying additives of the art, as in U.S. Pat. No. 3,125,547 (supra). 
     The term &#34;extrusion behavior&#34; is intended to include such parameters as the operating melt temperatures, die pressure reached during extrusion, maintenance of a steady die pressure during extrusion, maximum extrusion rates that can be achieved, maintenance of a steady extrusion rate, dimensional stability of the melt, absence of deposits of decomposed polymer or additives at the exit of the die surface and good surface quality of the extruded part. In some cases the invention may provide a means for carrying out the extrusion at a lower temperature. Blow molding, tubing manufacture and fiber spinning represent examples of extrusion processes that may be improved by means of this invention. Thus, the compositions of this invention, compared to polymers not containing both types (1) and (2) fluorocarbon polymers will show improved extrusion behavior, incorporating improvements in at least some of the parameters noted above. 
     With respect to the fluorocarbon polymer process aid of this invention, it has been independently discovered that there must be present an effective amount of polar functional groups selected from --COF, SO 2  F, --SO 2  Cl, --SO 3  M, --OSO 3  M, --COOR, and --COOM, wherein R is a C 1-3  alkyl group and M is hydrogen, a metal cation, preferably an alkali or alkaline earth metal cation, or a quaternary ammonium cation. Such functionality is usually present in the process aid: (1) as polymer chain end groups introduced during the polymerization or copolymerization, (2) by copolymerization of a functional-group-containing monomer, or (3) by subjecting the fluorocarbon polymer to ionizing radiation. 
     The fluorocarbon polymers of type (1) are those that are fluid at the melt-processing temperature of the difficultly melt-processible polymer. Thus, at processing temperature they must be above their melting point if crystalline, or above their glass transition temperature if amorphous, up to a suitable operating temperature, preferably no more than 300° C., more preferably no more than 200° C. The polymers should have sufficiently high molecular weight, with number average molecular weights greater than about 10,000, such that they do not exude from the difficultly melt-processible polymer extrudate at melt-processing temperatures. With respect to their chemical composition, it is preferred, but not essential, to employ fluorocarbon polymers having a fluorine to hydrogen ratio of at least 1:1.5. Fluorinated monomers which give rise to suitable polymers include vinylidene fluoride, hexafluoropropylene, chlorotrifluoroethylene, tetrafluoroethylene and perfluoroalkyl perfluorovinyl ethers. Specific examples of the fluorocarbon polymers of type (1) that may be employed in this invention include copolymers of vinylidene fluoride and a monomer selected from hexafluoropropylene, chlorotrifluoroethylene, 1-hydropentafluoropropylene and 2-hydropentafluoropropylene; copolymers of vinylidene fluoride, tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene or 1- or 2-hydropentafluoropropylene; copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and propylene and, optionally, vinylidene fluoride; copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and a perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether), preferably perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether), optionally containing a small amount (up to 2 mole %) of a third monomer; and copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene, all of which are known in the art. The presence or absence of the third monomer is of no known consequence in this invention. In some cases these copolymers may also include a bromo-containing cure site monomer as taught in Apotheker and Krusic, U.S. Pat. No. 4,035,565, or terminal iodo-groups, as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,243,770. The latter patent also discloses the use of iodo group-containing fluoroolefin comonomers. When certain molar ratios of monomers are used in these copolymers, then the glass transition temperature is near or below 0° C.; many of these polymers are useful elastomers that are readily available articles of commerce. 
     The fluorocarbon polymers of type (2) that are solid at the melt processing temperature of the difficultly melt-processible polymer include homopolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene with certain copolymerizable monomers. The selection of the fluorocarbon polymer of type (2) is not limited to high molecular weight polymers, whether the polymer is melt-processible or not melt-processible, whether the polymer is made by dispersion polymerization or suspension polymerization, or how much comonomer is present, except as stated above. For example, if excessive amounts of comonomer are used, the polymer will not be a solid at the temperature used for melt processing the difficultly melt-processible polymer; or, if a copolymer has too low a molecular weight, the copolymer may not be a solid at the temperature used for melt processing the difficultly melt-processible polymer. Suitable tetrafluoroethylene homopolymers include those that are high molecular weight and fibrillate, or do not fibrillate to a substantial extent, under shearing conditions, as well as those which are low molecular weight and non-fibrillating, such as those which have been subjected to ionizing radiation. Suitable monomers copolymerizable with tetrafluoroethylene to give melt-processible copolymers are ethylene, perfluoroolefins such as hexafluoropropylene, and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ethers) such as perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ethers) which contain functional groups such as --SO 2  F or --COOCH 3 . More than one comonomer may be used, provided all the aforesaid requirements are met. 
     In certain instances, when the difficultly-melt-processible polymer is processed at a high temperature, for example, a polyester or polyamide, some type (2) fluorocarbon polymers, for example, tetrafluoroethylene/hexafluoropropylene copolymers, may also serve as a type (1) fluorocarbon polymer. 
     The effect of the combined addition of fluorocarbon polymers types (1) and (2) in eliminating roughness of the extrudate, allowing increases in extrusion speed and reducing die pressures is significantly greater than when either type (1) or type (2) is used alone at concentrations equal to the sum of the concentrations of (1) and (2). In some cases it has been shown also that combining types (1) and (2), at total concentrations equal to or greater than that of the combined concentrations of additives, also produces unexpected improvements in certain extrusion parameters, for example, reduction or elimination of die pressure fluctuations, reduction of deposits at the die exit, reduction in the pressure required to operate the screw of the extruder, resulting in an increase in the time an extrusion can be carried out or in an increase in the throughput of polymer. It has been found in some instances that even when (1) and (2) are added at total concentrations as low as 0.0025 wt. %, all extrudate roughness is eliminated at extrusion shear rates well beyond 1000 sec- 1  (Example 2). Quantities in excess of 1 wt. % are not necessary. In general, if the fluorocarbon polymers are not compatible with the difficultly melt-processible polymer, that is to say, are not soluble in such polymer, the addition of higher levels serves no useful purpose, and when the incompatible fraction becomes too large, it may adversely affect the optical properties of the extrudate. Such is the case, for example, when the difficultly melt-processible polymer is a hydrocarbon polymer. The beneficial effects of even very low ratios of types (1) to (2) or types (2) to (1) are readily evident but, in general, there will be an optimum ratio of types (1) to (2) which may be determined experimentally for any particular combination of types (1) and (2). The weight ratio of fluorocarbon polymer type (1) to fluorocarbon polymer type (2) may vary from 2/98 to 95/5, preferably from 10/90 to 90/10. 
     Difficultly-melt-processible polymers are defined as those that either require uneconomically high extrusion pressures or temperatures for extrusion or extrude with unacceptable melt fracture, such that the surfaces of the extrudate are blemished under conditions that would be otherwise technically feasible or economically attractive; those that give excessive deposits of resin, decomposed resin or additives at the die exit (orifice); those that extrude under conditions such that large fluctuations in barrel or die pressure are experienced, sometimes to the extent that the pressure limit of the extruder is reached, resulting in automatic shutdown of the extruder. 
     Examples of difficultly-melt-processible polymers that may be operable in connection with the compositions and processes of the invention include the following: mono-olefin polymers, such as ethylene homopolymers and copolymers; vinyl aromatic polymers, such as polystyrene; copolymers of alpha-olefins, particularly ethylene, with vinyl esters, such as vinyl acetate and vinyl propionate, with (meth)acrylic esters, such as ethyl or methyl acrylate, with acrylonitrile, and with (meth)acrylic acids and their (ionomeric) metal salts and the like; chlorinated polyethylene; polyvinyl chloride; polyester; and polyamide. The difficultly-melt-processible polymer may also be a polymer blend or polymer alloy. 
     It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that for those resins that extrude at high temperatures and, in addition, are chemically sensitive, for example, polyester or polyamide, it is important to select fluorocarbon process aids that are thermally stable at the process temperatures. Generally speaking, such polymers are those that are very nearly perfluorinated, such as copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and other perfluoroolefins. Copolymers of vinylidene fluoride and hexafluoropropylene may dehydrohalogenate at temperatures in excess of about 250° C. and are of lesser utility under these conditions. 
     When the difficultly melt-processible polymer is a hydrocarbon polymer that is used, for example, in blown film extrusion, it will generally have a melt index (ASTM D-1238) at 190° C. of 5 or less, preferably 3 or less. For a high shear operation, such as fiber extrusion or injection molding, even higher melt index resins, for example, having a melt index of 20 or more, may suffer extrusion difficulties. 
     In the case of a hydrocarbon polymer component of the composition of this invention, it may comprise an elastomeric copolymer of ethylene and propylene and, optionally, a non-conjugated diene monomer, for example, 1,4-hexadiene, or, in general, any thermoplastic hydrocarbon polymer obtained by the homopolymerization or copolymerization of a monoolefin(s) of the formula CH 2  ═CHR, where R is H or an alkyl radical, usually of not more than eight carbon atoms. In particular, this invention is applicable to polyethylene, both of the high density type and the low density type, for example, densities within the range 0.89 to 0.97; polypropylene; polybutene-1; poly(3-methylbutene); poly(methylpentene); and linear low density copolymers of ethylene and an alpha-olefin such as propylene, butene-1, octene-1, hexene-1, decene-1, octadecene, or 4-methylpentene-1. Similarly, the invention is also applicable to blends of difficultly melt-processible polymers, and difficultly melt-processible polymers containing additives, such as antioxidants, light stabilizers, antiblocking agents, pigments, etc. 
     Difficultly-melt-processible polyesters are condensation polymers derived from dicarboxylic acids and dialcohols and/or from hydrocarboxylic acids or the corresponding lactones, such as polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate and poly-1,4-dimethylolcyclohexane terephthalate. 
     Difficultly-melt-processible polyamides and copolyamides are derived from diamines and dicarboxylic acids and/or amino acids or the corresponding lactams, such as polyamide 6, polyamide 6/6, polyamide 6/10, polyamide 11 and polyamide 12. 
     Because of the different melt characteristics of the various difficultly-melt-processible polymers disclosed hereinabove, the addition of the types (1) and (2) fluorocarbon polymers may be of greater value in some polymers than in others. Thus, for example, hydrocarbon polymers, such as polypropylene and branched polyethylene, that are not of high molecular weight have good melt flow characteristics even at low temperatures, so that surface roughness and other surface defects can be avoided by adjustment of extrusion conditions. Such hydrocarbon polymers may not require the use of the fluorocarbon polymer additives of this invention, or be noticeably improved by them, except under unusual, adverse extrusion conditions. Such polymers, therefore, are considered herein as not difficultly melt-processible polymers. However, other polymers, such as high molecular weight, high density polyethylene or linear low density ethylene copolymers, particularly those with narrow molecular weight distributions, do not have this degree of freedom in the variation of extrusion conditions and it is particularly with these resins that remarkable improvements in the surface quality of the extruded product are obtained with compositions containing the described type (1) and type (2) fluorocarbon polymers. 
     It will also be recognized by one skilled in the art that it may not be possible to achieve, simultaneously, reduced die pressure, increased throughput, improved surface quality or reduced pressure fluctuations to the maximum extent at given concentration of types (1) and (2). Thus, one might elect to attain maximum improvement in one parameter, in particular, at the expense of corresponding improvements in other parameters. For example, increased output of extrudate with high quality surface characteristics may not necessarily be accompanied by reduced die pressure. Moreover, certain difficultly-melt-processible polymers may show no melt fracture, but may require extremely high extrusion pressure in the absence of the processing aid of the invention. The best set of conditions will be determined by the specific requirements of the extrusion. 
     The addition of the fluorocarbon polymer modifiers to the difficultly melt-processible polymer can be accomplished by any of the means heretofore developed for the addition of modifiers to such polymers. For example, the fluorocarbon polymers (1) and (2) may be added independently to, for example, a hydrocarbon polymer on a rubber compounding mill or in a Banbury or other internal mixer or in a mixing extruder, in all of which the fluorocarbon polymers are uniformly distributed throughout the host polymer. It is also feasible to dry-blend the two fluoropolymers with the host polymer in the solid state, and then effect uniform distribution of the fluoropolymers in the melt extruder employed in the fabrication by using an extruder screw with good mixing capability. 
     Alternatively, masterbatch dispersions (mixtures) of types (1) and (2) in a diluent polymer, either together or separately, can be metered to the feed section of the extruder by appropriate devices. The diluent polymer can be a difficultly melt-processible polymer, or it can be a compatible melt-processible polymer that does not substantially deleteriously affect the interaction of the aforesaid components (a), (b)(1) and (b)(2) in achieving the beneficial effects of the invention. For example, the diluent polymer can be a melt-processible hydrocarbon polymer, such as a homopolymer or copolymer of a monoolefin(s) of the formula RCH═CH 2  wherein R is H or an alkyl radical, usually of not more than eight carbon atoms. In most cases such a hydrocarbon polymer will have a melt index (ASTM D-1238) at 190° C. of 20.0 or less, preferably 5.0 or less. In preparing such masterbatches the amounts of fluorocarbon polymers types (1) and (2) will usually be such that they provide 1-25 wt. %, preferably 1-10 wt. %, most preferably 1-5  wt. %, of the masterbatch. Further to the above regarding the need to avoid adversely affecting the beneficial effects of the invention, in preparing the masterbatch, the concentrations of types (1) and (2), as well as the diluent polymer, will be selected so as to achieve good mixing of all the ingredients. Particularly, fibrillation of the fluorocarbon polymer type (2) is to be avoided. In any of the above procedures, it is also possible to employ previously prepared mixtures of fluorocarbon polymer type (1) with fluorocarbon polymer type (2). 
     In the practice of this invention, it will be found that the beneficial effects are not necessarily observed immediately on the onset of extrusion, and depending on the overall concentrations of modifier, it may take from 10 minutes to 8 hours to reach stable extrusion rate and die pressure. Longer times are required at low concentrations of types (1) and (2). When it is desirable to operate at very low levels of modifiers and hasten the achievement of equilibrium, it may be expedient to first &#34;condition&#34; the extruder rapidly using a composition containing 0.1 to 1 wt. % of the fluorocarbon polymers types (1) and (2), and then to switch to the desired concentrations of types (1) and (2). 
     Just as it has been observed that the beneficial effects may not be observed immediately, it has also been observed that the beneficial effects may continue to be observed after addition of the fluorocarbon polymers of types (1) and (2) is discontinued. Consistent with this observation, after stable extrusion rate and die pressure are achieved, the beneficial effects of the invention may be realized by alternating a feed of difficultly melt-processible polymer and one containing the processing aid of the invention. 
     Except where noted, the evaluations reported below employ a C. W. Brabender Computerized Plasti-Corder equipped with a 19.1 mm (3/4 in.) diameter extruder with a 25/1 length/diameter ratio. The screw has ten feed flights, 10 compression flights with a compression ratio of 3:1, and 5 metering flights. Operating parameters are controlled by five independent heating zones (No. 5 closest to the die), four pressure transducers and a torque-measuring drive unit with 1-120 rpm capability. The instrument is equipped with software for rheometric capillary extrusion testing. The capillary die, made from #416  nitrided stainless steel, has a diameter of 2 mm and a length of 40 mm, unless otherwise noted. In operation, the required machine conditions are set and the polymer is then extruded, usually at 40 rpm, until equilibrium (constant throughput and constant die pressure) is reached. For a linear low density polyethylene with a melt index at 190° C. of 1, extrusion at 40 rpm at 204° C. gives a throughput of about 19-20 g/min. and a die pressure of 28 MPa (Comparative Example 1). For experiments that are run in sequence, by changing the feed composition, the initial output parameters correspond to the previous equilibrium, and then gradually change to a new equilibrium. When equilibrium is achieved a range of screw speeds is then run to produce new equilibrium values of throughput and die pressure. The relation between throughput and die pressure is determined from a plot of the data, and die pressure data at certain fixed production rates can be estimated for comparison of data between experiments. Surface quality of the extrudate is judged by visual examination. 
     After each run the extruder is thoroughly cleaned. The equipment is first purged with a highly filled abrasive composition, for example, the commercially available UCC-DFD-0964. The capillary die is removed and heated with a propane torch until it is free of polymer and has reached a red glow. The extruder is disassembled and each section -- screw, barrel, die assembly, and transducers -- is cleaned, first with a wire brush, and then with methyl ethyl ketone solvent. After reassembly and calibration of the transducers, the unmodified hydrocarbon polymer is run first to establish equilibrium conditions, and to assure that reliable output is being obtained. For this purpose, the equilibrium value at 40 rpm, only, was sometimes used. If previously established equilibrium values for unmodified polymer are not achieved, the cleanout procedure is repeated. 
     In Table 1 the various materials used in the examples which follow are identified. 
     EXAMPLES 
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 
     Hydrocarbon Polymer A was introduced to the extruder with the screw operating at 40 rpm and heating zones Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 controlling at nominal temperature settings of 150, 180, 200, 204, and 204° C., respectively (No. 5 is closest to the die). Equilibrium extrusion conditions, when throughput and die pressure were constant, were reached after a period of 15 min. The screw rpm was then systematically varied from 12 rpm to 60 rpm. After determining the extrusion rate at various screw speeds, the data were input to a computer program which generated a curve of die pressure vs. throughput (shown in Curve 1 of FIG. 1 which is a part of this specification). Selected values taken from Curve 1 are shown in Table 2. The extrudates of Hydrocarbon Polymer A had surface roughness at all extrusion rates above about 4 g/min. 
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 
     Hydrocarbon Polymer A which, as a dry blend, had intimately dispersed therein 0.1% of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A, was added to the extruder just at the end of Comparative Example 1, at the same nominal temperature settings and at a screw speed of 40 rpm. Steady state was achieved after 10 min. and did not change after a further 240 min. The die pressure/throughput relationship was then obtained as in Comparative Example 1 and is shown in Curve 2 of FIG. 1. Data are shown in Table 2. There was no significant effect of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A, alone, on the flow characteristics of Hydrocarbon Polymer A, and surface roughness appeared at all extrusion rates above about 4 g/min. 
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 
     An extruder warm-up was carried out as in Comparative Example 1 with unmodified Hydrocarbon Polymer A, giving the same results. Hydrocarbon Polymer A which, as a dry blend, had intimately dispersed therein 0.02 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A, was then added to the extruder at the same temperature settings and at a screw speed of 40 rpm. Steady state was achieved after 60 min. and did not change after a further 60 min. The die pressure/throughput relationship was then obtained as in Comparative Example 1 and is shown as Curve 3 in FIG. 1. Representative data are shown in Table 2. In this case there was an approximate 10% reduction in die pressure at a given throughput, compared to Comparative Example 1, and extrudates were smooth and glossy at extrusion rates below about 30 g/min. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     An extruder warm-up was carried out as in Comparative Example 1, giving the same results. Hydrocarbon Polymer A which, as a dry blend, had intimately dispersed therein 0.01 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A and 0.01 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A was then added at the same temperature settings and a screw speed of 40 rpm. A new equilibrium was established, after 180 min., at much lower pressures than for the hydrocarbon resin alone or for the composition of Comparative Example 3. The die pressure/throughput curve was then obtained as in Comparative Example 1, and is shown as Curve 4 in FIG. 1. Representative data are shown in Table 2.  There was an approximately 30% drop in die pressure over the entire range, compared to Hydrocarbon Polymer A, even though the combined concentrations of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1A and 2A in this example is no greater than the concentration of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A in Comparative Example 3. Extrudate surfaces were smooth and glossy throughout the range of extrusion rates attainable under the conditions of the example (up to 55 g/min., which is equivalent to a shear rate of about 1500 sec -1 ). When a 1.5 mm diameter die was used in order to obtain shear rates up to about 3000 sec -1 , the extrudate was smooth and glossy over the entire range of extrusion rates. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     An extruder warm-up was carried out as in Example 1, with similar results. A dry blend of Hydrocarbon Polymer A having intimately dispersed therein 0.0005 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A and 0.0020 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A was then added at the same temperature settings and a screw speed of 40 rpm. The new equilibrium was established after 180 minutes, at a lower die pressure than for the hydrocarbon resin alone or for the composition of Comparative Example 3. The die pressure/extrusion rate curve was obtained as in Example 1 and representative data are shown in Table 2. There was an approximately 28% reduction in die pressure over the entire extrusion rate range compared to Hydrocarbon Polymer A, even though the combined concentrations of Fluorocarbon Polymers lA and 2A is only 12.5% of the concentration of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A in Comparative Example 3. Extrudate surfaces were smooth and glossy at extrusion rates below 55 g/min. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     In this example a series of compositions was evaluated to demonstrate the effect of the relative weight ratios of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A to Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A, as shown in Table 3. Each composition was a dry blend of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1A and 2A in Hydrocarbon Polymer A, and after extruder warm-up as described in Example 1, each was added at the same temperature settings and a screw speed of 40 rpm. New equilibria were then established after 180 minutes, at lower die pressures than for the hydrocarbon resin alone or for the composition of Comparative Example 3. Die pressure/extrusion rate data were obtained as in Example 1 and are shown in Table 3. There is a significant reduction in die pressure over the entire range compared to Hydrocarbon Polymer A, even though the combined concentrations of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1A and 2A is no greater than the concentration in Comparative Example 3. Extrudate surfaces were smooth and glossy at extrusion rates up to 55 g/min. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     A composition of Hydrocarbon Polymer A containing an intimate dry powder mix of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1B and 2A, 0.01 wt. % of each, based on difficultly melt-processible polymer, was extruded and evaluated as in Example 1. A control experiment in which the difficultly melt-processible polymer contained 0.04 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1B, alone, was also carried out. Data in Table 4 show that the composition of this invention extrudes at very much lower die pressures than the control and the extrudate is free of surface imperfections at much higher extrusion rates, even though it contains only half as much total modifier. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     A composition of Hydrocarbon Polymer A containing an intimate dry powder mix of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1C and 2A, 0.01 wt. % of each, based on hydrocarbon polymer, was extruded and evaluated as in Example 1. A control experiment in which the hydrocarbon polymer contained 0.04 part by wt. of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1C, alone, was also carried out. Data in Table 4 show that the composition of this example extrudes at very much lower die pressures than the control and the extrudate is free of surface imperfections at much higher extrusion rates, even though it contains only half as much total modifier. 
     EXAMPLES 6-10 
     For each example, Hydrocarbon Polymer A, which as a dry blend had intimately dispersed therein 0.01 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A and 0.01 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymers 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, or 2F (Examples 6-10, respectively), was added to the extruder and treated in the manner described in Example 1. As shown by the data in Table 5, the new equilibria were then established after 180 minutes, at lower pressures than for the controls represented by Comparative Examples 1 and 3, Table 2. All extrudate surfaces were smooth and glossy throughout the range of extrusion rates up to 38 g/min. Compositions of Hydrocarbon Polymer A and 0.10 wt. % of any of the Fluorocarbon Polymers 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E and 2F showed no improvement in extrusion behavior (data not shown). 
     EXAMPLES 11 and 12 
     In these examples Hydrocarbon Polymers B and C were compared in formulations containing dry blends of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1A and 2A in the amounts shown in Table 6. Die pressure/extrusion rate data were evaluated as outlined in Example 1. For each example there is a control sample containing no additives and another showing the effect of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A alone. Data were analyzed as in Example 1 and are shown in Table 6. 
     EXAMPLE 13 
     In this experiment a chrome-plated, 2.54 cm (1 in.) wide slit die having a gap of 0.76 mm (0.03 in.) and a land length of 1.27 cm (0.5 in.) was used. A dry blend composition of Hydrocarbon Polymer A and 0.01 wt. % of each of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1A and 2A was fed at 60 rpm, giving the initial throughput and die pressure ratings indicated in Table 7. The initial extrudate had a rough dull surface. After 3 h the extrudate was smooth and glossy and there was a 17.5% reduction in die pressure as well as a 3.5% increase in throughput. The extrudate surface remained excellent up to the maximum throughput achievable with the extruder (55 g/min. at 120 rpm). In a similarly-run control experiment with Hydrocarbon Polymer A alone, the starting and final parameters were as shown in Table 7, and the extrudate had a dull rough surface at all extrusion rates above about 8 g/min. In another control experiment with 0.02 wt.% of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A, there was only a 3% pressure drop after 3 h and nil increase in throughput. The extrudate surface was smooth and glossy at 60 rpm, but dull and rough in appearance at all higher screw speeds. 
     Fluorocarbon Polymer 1D (Table 1) - Preparation 
     To a 4L mechanically agitated, water-jacketed, stainless steel autoclave operating continuously at 90° C. and 4800 kPa, was pumped, at the rate of 1500 mL/h, an aqueous polymerization medium/initiator solution comprising 1500 mL water, 3.85 g ammonium persulfate, 22 g of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (&#34;Fluorad&#34; FC-143, 3M Co.) and 22 g disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate (Na 2  HPO 4 .7H 2  O). At the same time, tetrafluoroethylene, TFE, (465 g/h), perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether), PMVE, (480 g/h) and vinylidene fluoride, VF2, (3.0 g/h) were fed to the autoclave at a constant rate by means of a diaphragm compressor. Polymer latex was removed continuously by means of a let-down valve and unreacted monomers were vented. The latex, from about 4 hrs. operation, was added with stirring to a preheated (90° C.) coagulating solution consisting of 320 g magnesium sulfate in 25 L water. The coagulated crumb was filtered off, washed repeatedly with water and dried by heating in an air oven at 80° C. for 48 hrs. to give about 3200 g of polymer. The polymer composition (wt. %) was 55.4% TFE, 44.2% PMVE and 0.4% VF2 as shown by infrared analysis. 
     EXAMPLE 14 
     The equipment employed was a Haake Buchler Rheomix® 19.1 mm (3/4 in.) diameter single-screw extruder with a chromium plated one-stage metering screw having a 20/1 length/diameter ratio, 10 feed flights, 5 compression flights, 5 metering flights and a channel depth ratio of 3. Operating parameters were controlled by four independent heating zones, two pressure transducers and a torque-measuring drive with 1-200 rpm capability. The extruder was equipped with software for rheometric capillary extrusion testing. The capillary die, made from #416 stainless steel, had a diameter of 1.27 mm and a length of 39.1 mm and was previously unused. Prior to each use the extruder was thoroughly cleaned by first purging with Hydrocarbon Polymer A containing 20% silica. The extruder was then disassembled and each section was cleaned with a wire brush and then methyl ethyl ketone solvent. The die holder was cleaned by heating at 600° C. for 4 hrs. 
     (A) A commercially available extrusion grade polystyrene, Styron 685D (Dow Chemical Co.), density 1.40 g/cc, melt flow rate 1.6 g/10 min., was fed to the extruder, equipped with a new die, with the screw operating at 5 rpm and heating zones 1, 2, 3, and 4 controlled at nominal settings of 150, 180, 200 and 240° C., respectively (No. 4 is closest to the die). Equilibrium extrusion conditions were achieved after 120 min. The screw speed was then systematically varied from 1 rpm to 120 rpm to generate, as previously described, the correlation of extruder throughput and die pressure shown in Curve 1 of FIG. 2. Melt fracture was not observed at any screw speed tested, but die buildup (collection of polymer at the exit of the capillary die) was observed at screw speeds greater than 60 rpm. 
     (B) Without changing conditions the feed was changed to a powder blend of polystyrene containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2G. Using the procedure of Part A, a new equilibrium was established after 240 min., and the data of Curve 2 in FIG. 2 was generated. Die buildup was not observed at any screw speed. 
     (C) Without changing conditions the extruder was thoroughly purged with Hydrocarbon Polymer A containing 20 wt. % of silica. Then the procedure of Part A was repeated except that the extruder feed was changed to a powder blend of polystyrene containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1D. After a total extrusion time of 250 min., conventional capillary rheometer curves were generated and the plot of FIG. 2, Curve 3 was obtained. No melt fracture or die buildup was observed. 
     (D) The procedure of Part C was repeated except that after purging the feed was changed to a powder blend of polystyrene containing 0.05 wt. % each of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1D and 2G. After a total extrusion time of 240 min. the data shown in FIG. 2, Curve 4 was obtained. No melt fracture or die buildup was observed. 
     EXAMPLE 15 
     In a procedure like that of Example 14, except that the extruder heating zones Numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 were controlled at nominal temperature settings of 160, 180, 220 and 220° C., respectively, the performance of an extrusion grade ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer Elvax®-3135 (Du Pont Co.), density 0.930 g/cc, melt index of 0.35 g/10 min., was evaluated. Curve 1 of FIG. 3 shows data for extrusion of unmodified EVA copolymer. Curve 2 shows data for a blend containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2G and Curve 3 shows data for a blend containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1D. Curve 4 of the figure show the data for an EVA containing 0.05 wt. % each of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1D and 2G. 
     EXAMPLE 16 
     (A) In a procedure like that of Example 14, except that the extruder heating zones Numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 were controlled at nominal temperature settings of 280, 310, 310 and 310° C., respectively, the performance of an extrusion grade copolymer of ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid (Goodyear PET), density 1.39 g/cc, inherent viscosity (0.05 wt. % in a 3/1 mixture of methylene chloride and trifluoroacetone) 1.65, was evaluated. Die pressure was measured at a constant screw speed of 5 rpm over a period of 120 min. The die pressure fluctuated steadily between about 3 to 10 MPa with a time period of several minutes. After 120 minutes the screw speed was varied from 1 to 30 rpm. Large die pressure fluctuations continued and at 30 rpm caused automatic shutoff of the extruder, which had a safety cutoff pressure set at 70 MPa. At 30 rpm flow rate was 19.8 g/min. Thus, the PET could not be extruded at screw speeds greater than 30 rpm or at a flow rate greater than 19.8 g/min. In addition, an accumulation of dark decomposed polymer was observed to build up at the exit of the capillary die at all extrusion speeds. Curve 1 of FIG. 4 shows data for the extrusion of unmodified PET up to the point of automatic shutoff. Pressure values are the averages of the high and low extremes. 
     (B) Without changing conditions, the feed was switched to a blend of the PET containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2G; the blend was evaluated as in Part A. After several minutes at 5 rpm the large pressure fluctuations abruptly ceased and there were no pressure fluctuations at screw rates up to 60 rpm, where the flow rate was 28.2 g/min., and there was no accumulation of polymer at the die exit. At 90 rpm high pressure fluctuations again caused automatic shutdown of the extruder. Extrusion data are shown in Curve 2 of FIG. 4 and show that, at equivalent flow rates, the extrusion pressures are higher for the blend containing the process aid. 
     (C) The extruder feed was changed to a powder blend of the PET containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 1D; the blend was evaluated as in Part A. After several minutes at 5 rpm the large pressure fluctuations observed in Part A ceased. After 120 minutes the screw speed was varied from 1 to 60 rpm, where the flow rate was 31.2 g/min. The pressure was steady at all speeds and there was no accumulation of decomposed polymer at the die exit. At 90 rmp the pressure exceeded the safety cutoff pressure. Extrusion data are shown in Curve 3 of FIG. 4. As in Part B, the extrusion pressures were higher for the blend than for the PET not containing process aid. 
     (D) The procedure of Part A was repeated using a powder blend of PET containing 0.05 wt. % each of Fluorocarbon Polymers 1D and 2G. In this case the extrusion could be carried out at up to 90 rpm without pressure fluctuations, at which rpm a flow rate of 47.4 g/min. was achieved without die accumulation. Moreover, using the combination of process aids the extrusion pressure was surprisingly much lower than when these fluorocarbon polymers were used singly. Data are shown in Curve 4 of FIG. 4. 
     EXAMPLE 17 
     The evaluations reported below employed the apparatus described in Example 14, using a capillary die made from #416 nitrided stainless steel that had a diameter of 0.38 mm and a length of 0.76 mm. The die was heated in an electric furnace for 4 hours at 450° C. prior to use. 
     (A) A commercially available fiber grade nylon 66 having a relative viscosity of 43, density 1.10 g/cc (T-972, Du Pont Co.) was fed into the extruder with the screw operating at 5 rpm and heating zones Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 controlled at nominal temperature settings of 260, 270, 270 and 270° C., respectively, (No. 4 is closest to the die). After equilibrium was achieved, screw speed was reduced to 3 rpm to achieve an extrusion rate of 2 g/min. Die pressure at this extrusion rate was 3.1 MPa. After a period of one hour no buildup of polymer was observed at the exit of the die. The temperatures of heating zones 3 and 4 were then both increased periodically in 5° C. increments, up to a temperature of 300° C. In each case the extrusion rate was adjusted to 2 g/min. by changing the rpm, and the extrusion was continued for one hour. Whenever a die deposit was observed to collect at the die exit, at any temperature, the die was cleaned by wiping shortly after increasing to the next higher temperature and adjusting the screw speed. Buildup of a ring of black decomposed polymer first appeared at the exit of the die, around the extruding nylon fiber, during the extrusion at 280° C. Similarly, a ring of decomposed polymer appeared at all temperatures tested between 280° and 300° C. 
     (B) Starting conditions were returned to a screw speed of 5 rpm and heating zones Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 controlled at settings of 260, 270, 270 and 270° C., respectively. The extruder feed was changed to a powder blend of the nylon containing 0.05 wt. % of Fluorocarbon Polymer 2G. After equilibrium was achieved, screw speed was increased to 10 rpm to achieve an extrusion rate of 2 g/min. Die pressure at this extrusion rate was 3.8 MPa. After a period of one hour no buildup of polymer was observed at the exit of the die. The temperatures of heating zones 3 and 4 were then incrementally increased as described in Part A. Buildup of a globule of black decomposed polymer first appeared at the exit of the die, near the extruding nylon fiber, during the extrusion at 285° C. After wiping the die clean, a globule of decomposed polymer appeared at all temperatures tested between 285° and 300° C. 
     (C) The procedure of Part A was repeated except that the extruder feed was changed to a powder blend of the nylon containing 0.05 wt. % of an additive similar to Fluorocarbon Polymer 2C but having a melt viscosity of 10,300 Ns/m 2  at 372° C. (DSC melting point maximum at 260° C.). After equilibrium was achieved at a melt temperature of 270° C. and a screw speed of 5 rpm, screw speed was held constant at 5 rpm to achieve an extrusion rate of 2 g/min. Die pressure at this extrusion rate was 4.7 MPa. After a period of one hour no buildup of polymer was observed at the exit of the die. The temperatures of heating zones 3 and 4 were then both increased periodically in 5° C. increments as described in Part A, and the extrusion speed was adjusted to 2 g/min. in each case. Buildup of a globule of black decomposed polymer first appeared at the exit of the die, near the extruding nylon fiber, during the extrusion at 280° C., and then at all temperatures tested between 280° and 300° C. 
     (D) The procedure of Part A was repeated except that the extruder feed was changed to a powder blend of the nylon containing 0.02 wt. % each of the fluorocarbon polymers described in Parts B and C. After equilibrium was achieved at a melt temperature of 270° C. and a screw speed of 5 rpm, screw speed was held constant at 5 rpm to achieve an extrusion rate of g/min. Die pressure at this extrusion rate was 4.7 MPa. After a period of one hour no buildup of polymer was observed at the exit of the die. The temperatures of heating zones 3 and 4 were then both increased periodically in 5° C. increments to 300° C. as described in Part A. No buildup of either a ring or globule of decomposed polymer appeared at the exit of the die during extrusion at any temperature between 270° C. and 300° C., the highest temperature tested. 
     TABLE 1 
     Type (1) Fluorocarbon Polymers 
     1A: A commercially available fluoroelastomer containing polymer repeat units of 60 wt. % vinylidene fluoride and 40 wt. % hexafluoropropylene and having a Mooney viscosity of 60 at 100° C. It was in the form of a fine powder which had been obtained by cryogenic grinding and had a light dusting of calcium carbonate as an antiblocking agent. 
     1B: A commercially available fluoroelastomer containing polymer repeat units of 45 wt. % vinylidene fluoride, 30 wt. % hexafluoropropylene and 25 wt. % tetrafluoroethylene and having a Mooney viscosity of 80 at 121° C. It was ground and dusted as in 1A. 
     1C: A commercially available copolymer composed of polymer repeat units of tetrafluoroethylene, propylene and vinylidene fluoride. 
     1D: A fluoroelastomer containing polymer repeat units of tetrafluoroethylene (55.4 wt. %), perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) (44.2 wt. %), and vinylidene fluoride (0.4 wt. %). 
     Type (2) Fluorocarbon Polymers: 
     2A: A commercially available free-flowing PTFE powder comprising loose agglomerates of sub-micron size particles having fibrillating characteristics that was treated with ionizing electron beam radiation until the melt viscosity was reduced to 1.1×10 4  Ns/m 2 . 
     2B: A commercially available, high molecular weight, non-melt-processible PTFE, prepared by suspension polyaerization, having a standard specific gravity of 2.16 and an average particle size of 35 micrometers. 
     2C: A commercially available powdered copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and 12 wt. % of hexafluoropropylene and having a melt viscosity of 9,500 Ns/m 2  at 372° C. 
     2D: A commercially available powdered copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and 3-4 wt. % of perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) and having a melt viscosity of 4,700 Ns/m 2  at 372° C. 
     2E: A commercially available powdered copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and 3-4 wt. % of perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) and having a melt viscosity of 34,000 Ns/m 2  at 372° C. 
     2F: A commercially available powdered, essentially alternating copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, ethylene and a small amount of a proprietary comonomer, and having a melt flow of 20 at 297° C. (ASTM-D3159). 
     2G: An experimental polymer sililar to 2A but having a melt viscosity of 11.3 Ns/m 2 . 
     Hydrocarbon Polymers 
     A: A high molecular weight, linear low density (d=0.918) copolymer of ethylene and butene-1 having a melt index (ASTM D-1238, cond. E) of 1.0. 
     B: A high density polyethylene (d=0.945) having a melt index of 0.05. 
     C: A low density (d=0.925) polyethylene containing 5 wt. % of high density polyethylene and a small quantity of poly(vinyl acetate), and having a melt index of 0.50. 
     
                                           TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________         Comparative Examples                           Example                                ExampleEXAMPLES      1     2     3     1    2__________________________________________________________________________COMPOSITION (% by wt.)Hydrocarbon Polymer A         100   99.9   99.95                            99.98                                  99.9975Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A         --     0.1  --     0.01                                  0.002Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A         --    --     0.02  0.01                                  0.0005Throughput (g/min.)         Die Pressure (MPa) 2.1           9.9 5.0          16.4              11.7 7.9          20.4  20.2  18.6  14.310.0          22.1  22.1  19.6  15.6 14.915.0          26.3  26.3  24.1  18.9 18.020.0          29.1  29.1  27.0  21.1 20.225.0          31.3  31.3  29.5  23.4 22.430.0          33.5  33.4  31.7  25.4 24.535.0          34.3        33.7  26.940.0          35.4              28.345.0          35.8              29.450.0                            30.455.0                            30.9Surface       R, D above               R, D above                     S, G at                           S, G to                                S, G to         4 g/min.               4 g/min.                     29 g/min.                           55 g/min.                                55 g/min.                     and below__________________________________________________________________________ S  smooth G  glossy R  rough D  dull 
    
     
                                           TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________EXAMPLE 3         A    B   C   D   E   F__________________________________________________________________________COMPOSITION (% by wt.)Hydrocarbon Polymer A         99.980              99.980                  99.980                      99.980                          99.980                              99.980Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A         0.0196              0.019                  0.018                      0.016                          0.002                              0.001Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A         0.0004              0.001                  0.002                      0.004                          0.018                              0.019Wt. ratio 1A/2A         2/98 5/95                  10/90                      20/80                          90/10                              95/5Throughput (g/min.)         Die Pressure (MPa)   10         15.1  7.7                   8.4                      11.5                          18.3                              17.3   15         18.5  9.9                  10.7                      14.2                          21.8                              21.1   20         21.0 11.8                  13.1                      16.3                          24.6                              24.1   25         23.3 13.9                  15.8                      18.2                          26.9                              26.8   30         25.4 16.0                  18.6                      20.2                          28.8                              29.2Surface       all extrudates were smooth and glossy up to 55__________________________________________________________________________         g/min. 
    
     
                                           TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________         Control               Example 4                     Control                           Example 5__________________________________________________________________________COMPOSITION (% by wt.)Hydrocarbon Polymer A         99.96 99.98 99.96 99.98Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A         --    0.01  --    0.01Fluorocarbon Polymer 1B         0.04  0.01  --    --Fluorocarbon Polymer 1C         --    --    0.04  0.01Throughput (g/min.)         Die Pressure (MPa)   10         17.4   8.7  22.3  19.7   15         21.5  10.9  26.8  23.6   20         24.5  12.7  29.6  26.0   25         27.1  14.8  31.7  28.3   30         29.4  17.0  33.3  30.4Surface       S, G below               S, G below                     S, G below                           S, G to         38 g/min.               55 g/min.                     28 g/min.                           55 g/min.__________________________________________________________________________ S  smooth G  glossy R  rough D  dull 
    
     
                                           TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________         Examples         6    7   8     9   10__________________________________________________________________________COMPOSITION (% by wt.)Hydrocarbon Polymer A         99.98              99.98                  99.98 99.98                            99.98Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A         0.01 0.01                  0.01  0.01                            0.01Fluorocarbon Polymer 2B         0.01 --  --    --  --Fluorocarbon Polymer 2C         --   0.01                  --    --  --Fluorocarbon Polymer 2D         --   --  0.01  --  --Fluorocarbon Polymer 2E         --   --  --    0.01                            --Fluorocarbon Polymer 2F         --   --  --    --  0.01Throughput (g/min.)         Die Pressure (MPa)   10         19.3 20.0                  19.8  19.3                            18.4   15         23.2 22.7                  23.8  23.7                            22.6   20         25.9 25.2                  27.0  26.7                            25.6   25         28.4 27.6                  29.6  29.4                            28.3   30         30.6 29.7                  --    31.7                            30.7Surface       all surfaces smooth and glossy below 38 g/min.__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     
                                           TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________         Control               Control                    Example 11                          Control                               Control                                    Example 12__________________________________________________________________________COMPOSITION (% by wt.)Hydrocarbon Polymer B         100   99.96                    99.98 --   --   --Hydrocarbon Polymer C         --    --   --    100  99.92                                    99.96Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A         --    0.04 0.01  --   0.08 0.02Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A         --    --   0.01  --   --   0.02Throughput (g/min.)         Die Pressure (MPa)   10         25.4  19.0 --    --   --   --   15         unstable               19.6 17.9  12.4 11.9 11.5   20         unstable               21.5 19.3  13.6 13.1 12.9   25         unstable               --   --    14.7 14.2 14.0   30         unstable               --   --    15.7 15.0 14.9Surface       R, D above               S, G to                    S, G to                          S, G to                               S, G to                                    S, G to*         10 g/min.               23 g/min.                    23 g/min.                          38 g/min.                               38 g/min.                                    38 g/min.__________________________________________________________________________ S  smooth  G  glossy R  rough D  dull *These extrudates did not have the occasional cloudy streaks that appeare in the controls. 
    
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________         Control Control  Example 13______________________________________COMPOSITION (% by wt.)Fluorocarbon Polymer 1A           --        0.02     0.02Fluorocarbon Polymer 2A           --        --       0.02Starting pressure, MPa           25.4      25.6     25.1Starting throughput, g/min.           25.7      24.7     24.7Ending pressure, MPa           25.4      24.8     19.7Ending throughput, g/min.           25.7      24.9     25.8Surface         rough     smooth   smooth                     glossy   glossy______________________________________