Abstract:
The invention provides a new and distinct hybrid variety of tomato, ENHANCER or NUN 00001 TOR which is especially useful as tomato rootstock.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to the field of plant breeding and, more specifically, to the development of tomato variety ENHANCER (also designated as NUN 00001 TOR). 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The goal of vegetable breeding is to combine various desirable traits in a single variety/hybrid. Such desirable traits may include greater yield, resistance to diseases, insects or other pests, tolerance to heat and drought, better agronomic quality, higher nutritional value, enhanced growth rate and improved fruit properties. 
     Breeding techniques take advantage of a plant&#39;s method of pollination. There are two general methods of pollination: a plant self-pollinates if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same genotype. A plant cross-pollinates if pollen comes to it from a flower of a different genotype. 
     Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for a uniform type over many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny of homozygous plants. A cross between two such homozygous plants of different varieties produces a uniform population of hybrid plants that are heterozygous for many gene loci. The extent of heterozygosity in the hybrid is a function of the genetic distance between the parents. Conversely, a cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of loci produces a segregating population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and are not uniform. The resulting non-uniformity makes performance unpredictable. 
     Tomato cultivars may be grouped by maturity, i.e. the time required from planting the seed to the stage where fruit harvest can occur. Standard maturity classifications include ‘early’, ‘midseason’ or late-maturing’. Another classification for tomatoes is the developmental timing of fruit set. ‘Determinant’ plants grow foliage, then transition into a reproductive phase of flower setting, pollination and fruit development. Consequently, determinant cultivars have a large proportion of the fruit ripen within a short time frame. Growers that harvest only once in a season favor determinant type cultivars. In contrast, ‘indeterminate’ types grow foliage, then enter a long phase where flower and fruit development proceed along with new foliar growth. Growers that harvest the same plants multiple times favor indeterminate type cultivars. In response to more recent consumer demands for dietary diversity, tomato breeders have developed a wider range of colors. In addition to expanding the range of red colored fruits, there are cultivars that produce fruits that are creamy white, lime green, yellow, green, golden, orange and purple. Additionally, there are multi-colored varieties exemplified by mainly red fruited varieties with green shoulders, and both striped- and variegated-colored fruit. 
     Tomato Grafting has been utilized worldwide in Asia and Europe for greenhouse and high tunnel production and is gaining popularity in the United States. In tomatoes, increases in fruit yield are likely due to increased water and nutrient uptake among vigorous rootstock genotypes. The main advantage of grafting is that rootstocks can be used which provide or enhance resistance against soil-borne diseases, especially when genetic or chemical approaches for disease management are not available or not sufficient. Thus, disease susceptible tomato scions can be grafted onto disease resistant rootstocks for tomato production. Apart from providing resistance against fungi and viruses, the use of grafting can also increase tolerance against different abiotic stresses such as cold/low temperature tolerance, drought tolerance, salinity tolerance, flooding/water tolerance and can have beneficial effects on e.g. growth, yield, nutrient uptake, plant vigor, fruit size and fruit quality. There are several methods for grafting tomatoes each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The most common methods are described in Davis et al. (2008), Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences Vol. 27, “Cucurbit Grafting”, page 50-74, and are amongst others the following: 
     1) Tongue Approach/Approach Graft, 
     2) Hole insertion/Terminal/Top Insertion Graft, 
     3) One Cotyledon/Slant/Splice/Tube Graft and 
     4) Cleft/Side Insertion Graft 
     The fruits of tomato plants which are more suitable for processing are generally red colored and have pink to red/crimson fruit flesh. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     In one aspect, the present invention provides a tomato plant of the variety designated ENHANCER. Also provided are tomato plants having all or essentially all the physiological and morphological characteristics of such plants. Parts of the tomato plant of the present invention are also provided, for example, including a leaf, pollen, an ovule, a fruit, a scion, a rootstock and a cell of the plant. 
     The invention also concerns seed of tomato variety ENHANCER. The tomato seed of the invention may be provided as an essentially homogeneous population of tomato seed. Therefore, seed of the invention may be defined as forming at least about 97% of the total seed, including at least about 98%, 99% or more of the seed. The population of tomato seed may be particularly defined as being essentially free from other seed. The seed population may be separately grown to provide an essentially homogeneous population of tomato plants according to the invention. Also encompassed are plants grown from seeds of tomato variety ENHANCER and plant parts thereof. 
     Another aspect refers to a tomato plant, or a part thereof, having all or essentially all the physiological and morphological characteristics of a tomato plant of tomato variety ENHANCER. 
     In another aspect of the invention, a tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant of variety ENHANCER is provided. The tissue culture will preferably be capable of regenerating plants capable of expressing all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of a plant of the invention, and of regenerating plants having substantially the same genotype as other such plants. Examples of some such physiological and morphological characteristics include those traits set forth in Table 1 herein. The regenerable cells in such tissue cultures may be derived, for example, from embryos, meristems, cotyledons, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, pistil, flower, seed and stalk. Thus, a tissue culture may comprise regenerable cells from embryos, meristems, cotyledons, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, pistil, flower, seed and stalk. Still further, the present invention provides tomato plants regenerated from a tissue culture of the invention, the plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of a plant of the invention. 
     In yet another aspect of the invention, processes are provided for producing tomato seeds, plants and fruit, which processes generally comprise crossing a first parent tomato plant with a second parent tomato plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent tomato plants is a plant of the of the variety designated. 
     These processes may be further exemplified as processes for preparing hybrid tomato seed or plants, wherein a first tomato plant is crossed with a second tomato plant of a different, distinct variety to provide a hybrid that has, as one of its parents, the tomato plant variety ENHANCER. 
     In one embodiment of the invention, the invention provides a method for producing a seed of a variety derived from ENHANCER comprising the steps of (a) crossing a tomato plant of variety ENHANCER with a second tomato plant; and (b) allowing seed of a variety ENHANCER-derived tomato plant to form. This method can further comprise steps of (c) crossing a plant grown from said variety ENHANCER-derived tomato seed with itself or a second tomato plant to yield additional variety ENHANCER-derived tomato seed; (d) growing said additional variety ENHANCER-derived tomato seed of step (c) to yield additional variety ENHANCER-derived tomato plants; and optionally (e) repeating the crossing and growing steps of (c) and (d) to generate further variety ENHANCER-derived tomato plants. For example, the second tomato plant is of an inbred tomato variety. 
     In another embodiment of the invention, tomato variety ENHANCER is crossed to produce hybrid seed of the variety designated ENHANCER. In any cross herein, either parent may be the male or female parent. In these processes, crossing will result in the production of seed. The seed production occurs regardless of whether the seed is collected or not. 
     In one embodiment of the invention, the first step in “crossing” comprises planting seeds of a first and a second parent tomato plant, often in proximity so that pollination will occur for example, mediated by insect vectors. Alternatively, pollen can be transferred manually. Where the plant is self-pollinated, pollination may occur without the need for direct human intervention other than plant cultivation. 
     A second step may comprise cultivating or growing the seeds of the first and the second parent tomato plants into plants that bear flowers. A third step may comprise preventing self-pollination of the plants, such as by emasculating the male portions of flowers, (e.g., treating or manipulating the flowers to produce an emasculated parent tomato plant). Self-incompatibility systems may also be used in some hybrid crops for the same purpose. Self-incompatible plants still shed viable pollen and can pollinate plants of other varieties but are incapable of pollinating themselves or other plants of the same variety. 
     A fourth step for a hybrid cross may comprise cross-pollination between the first and second parent tomato plants. In certain embodiments, pollen may be transferred manually or by the use of insect vectors. Yet another step comprises harvesting the seeds from at least one of the parent tomato plants. The harvested seed can be grown to produce a tomato plant or hybrid tomato plant. 
     The present invention also provides the tomato seeds and plants produced by a process that comprises crossing a first parent tomato plant with a second parent tomato plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent tomato plants is a plant provided herein, such as from variety ENHANCER. In another embodiment of the invention, tomato seed and plants produced by the process are first filial generation (F1) hybrid tomato seed and plants produced by crossing a plant in accordance with the invention with another, distinct plant. The present invention further contemplates plant parts of such an F1 hybrid tomato plant, and methods of use thereof. Therefore, certain exemplary embodiments of the invention provide an F1 hybrid tomato plant and seed thereof. 
     In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of producing a plant or a seed derived from variety ENHANCER, the method comprising the steps of: (a) preparing a progeny plant derived from said variety by crossing a plant of variety ENHANCER with a second plant; and (b) selfing the progeny plant or crossing it to the second plant or to a third plant to produce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation. 
     The method may additionally comprise: (c) growing a progeny plant of a further subsequent generation from said seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation and selfing the progeny plant of a subsequent generation or crossing it to the second, the third, or a further plant; and repeating the steps for 3 or more times, e.g., an additional 3-10 generations to produce a further plant derived from the aforementioned starting variety. The further plant derived from variety ENHANCER may be an inbred variety, and the aforementioned repeated crossing steps may be defined as comprising sufficient inbreeding to produce the inbred variety. In the method, it may be desirable to select particular plants resulting from step (c) for continued crossing according to steps (b) and (c). By selecting plants having one or more desirable traits, a plant is obtained which possesses some of the desirable traits of the starting plant as well as potentially other selected traits. 
     The invention also concerns methods of vegetatively propagating a plant of the invention. In certain embodiments, the method comprises the steps of: (a) collecting tissue capable of being propagated from a plant of the invention; (b) cultivating said tissue to obtain proliferated shoots; and (c) rooting said proliferated shoots to obtain rooted plantlets. In some of these embodiments, the method further comprises growing plants from said rooted plantlets. 
     One aspect of the invention refers to a method of producing a tomato plant comprising crossing a tomato plant of variety ENHANCER with a second tomato plant one or more times. This method comprises in one embodiment selecting progeny from said crossing. 
     In another aspect of the invention, a plant of variety ENHANCER comprising an added heritable trait is provided, e.g., an Essentially Derived Variety of ENHANCER having one, two or three physiological and/or morphological characteristics which are different from those of ENHANCER and which otherwise has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of Enhancer, wherein a representative sample of seed of variety ENHANCER has been deposited under NCIMB Accession Number 42423. The heritable trait may comprise a genetic locus that is, for example, a dominant or recessive allele. In one embodiment of the invention, a plant of the invention is defined as comprising a single locus conversion. For example, one, two, three or more heritable traits may be introgressed at any particular locus using a different allele that confers the new trait or traits of interest. In specific embodiments of the invention, the single locus conversion confers one or more traits such as, for example, herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, disease resistance and modulation of plant metabolism and metabolite profiles. In further embodiments, the trait may be conferred by a naturally occurring gene introduced into the genome of the variety by backcrossing, a natural or induced mutation, or a transgene introduced through genetic transformation techniques into the plant or a progenitor of any previous generation thereof. When introduced through transformation, a genetic locus may comprise one or more genes integrated at a single chromosomal location. 
     For example, in certain embodiments, the invention provides methods of introducing a desired trait into a plant of the invention comprising: (a) crossing a plant of variety ENHANCER with a second tomato plant that comprises a desired trait to produce F1 progeny, (b) selecting an F1 progeny that comprises one, two, three or more desired trait(s), (c) crossing the selected F1 progeny with a plant of variety ENHANCER to produce backcross progeny, and (d) selecting backcross progeny comprising the desired trait(s) and which otherwise has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of variety ENHANCER. Optionally, steps (c) and (d) can be repeated one, two, three or more times such as three, four, five, six or seven times, in succession to produce selected fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh or eighth or higher backcross progeny that comprises the desired trait. The invention also provides tomato plants produced by these methods. 
     Still yet another aspect of the invention refers to the genetic complement of a tomato plant variety of the invention. The phrase “genetic complement” is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the expression of which defines the phenotype of, in the present case, a tomato plant of, or a cell or tissue of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents the genetic makeup of a cell, tissue or plant, and a hybrid genetic complement represents the genetic make-up of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. The invention thus provides tomato plant cells that have a genetic complement in accordance with the tomato plant cells disclosed herein, and plants, seeds and plants containing such cells. 
     Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic marker profiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic complement, e.g., gene expression profiles, gene product expression profiles and isozyme typing profiles. It is understood that a plant of the invention or a first generation progeny thereof could be identified by any of the many well-known techniques such as, for example, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (see, e.g., EP 534 858), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). 
     In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides hybrid genetic complements, as represented by tomato plant cells, tissues, plants, and seeds, formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of a tomato plant of the invention with a haploid genetic complement of a second tomato plant, preferably, another, distinct tomato plant. In another aspect, the present invention provides a tomato plant regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises a hybrid genetic complement of this invention. 
     In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a plant of a tomato variety that exhibits a combination of traits comprising a deeply toothed or cut (sps. towards base) margin of major leaflets, no fasciation of first flower of 2 nd  or 3 rd  inflorescence and resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV). 
     Said tomato variety further exhibits at least one further trait selected from the group consisting of a moderately hairy pubescence on younger stems (USDA criterion), a late-season onset of leaflet rolling (USDA criterion). 
     In another preferred embodiment, further characteristics are resistance to Bacterial Speck ( Pseudomonas tomato ),  Fusarium  wilt race 1 ( F. oxysporum f. lycopersici ),  Fusarium  wilt race 2 ( F. oxysporum f. lycopersici ),  Verticillium  wilt race 1 ( V. albo - atrum ), and Southern Root Knot Nematode ( M. incognia ). 
     In certain embodiments, the combination of traits may be defined as controlled by genetic means for the expression of the combination of traits found in tomato variety NUN 00162. 
     In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of determining the genotype of a plant of the invention comprising detecting in the genome (e.g., a sample of nucleic acids) of the plant at least a first polymorphism. The method may, in certain embodiments, comprise detecting a plurality of polymorphisms in the genome of the plant, for example by obtaining a sample of nucleic acid from a plant and detecting in said nucleic acids a plurality of polymorphisms. The method may further comprise storing the results of the step of detecting the plurality of polymorphisms on a computer readable medium. 
     In certain embodiments, the present invention provides a method of producing tomatoes comprising: (a) obtaining a plant of the invention, wherein the plant has been cultivated to maturity, and (b) collecting tomatoes from the plant. 
     The invention also provides for a food or feed product comprising or consisting of a plant part described herein preferably a tomato fruit or part thereof and/or an extract from a plant part described herein. The food or feed product may be fresh or processed, e.g., canned, steamed, boiled, fried, blanched and/or frozen, etc. 
     Any embodiment discussed herein with respect to one aspect of the invention applies to other aspects of the invention as well, unless specifically noted. 
     Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and any specific examples provided, while indicating specific embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description. 
     DEFINITIONS 
     In the description and tables herein, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, the following definitions are provided: 
     The term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the standard deviation of error for the device or method being employed to determine the value. 
     The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and to “and/or.” 
     When used in conjunction with the word “comprising” or other open language in the claims, the words “a” and “an” denote “one or more” unless specifically noted. 
     The terms “comprise,” “have” and “include” are open-ended linking verbs. Any forms or tenses of one or more of these verbs, such as “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes” and “including,” are also open-ended. For example, any method that “comprises,” “has” or “includes” one or more steps is not limited to possessing only those one or more steps and also covers other unlisted steps. Similarly, any plant that “comprises,” “has” or “includes” one or more traits is not limited to possessing only those one or more traits and covers other unlisted traits. The terms mentioned above also comprise the term “contain” which is limited to specific embodiments. Thus, one embodiment of the invention, when the terms “comprise,” “have” and “include” are used to describe a plant, part thereof or a process, refers to an embodiment wherein the limiting term “contain” is used. 
     “Tomato” refers herein to plants of the species  Solanum lycopersicum.    
     “Cultivated tomato” refers to plants of  Solanum lycopersicum , i.e. varieties, breeding lines or cultivars of the species  Solanum lycopersicum , cultivated by humans and having good agronomic characteristics; preferably such plants are not “wild plants”, i.e. plants which generally have much poorer yields and poorer agronomic characteristics than cultivated plants and e.g. grow naturally in wild populations. “Wild plants” include for example ecotypes, PI (Plant Introduction) lines, landraces or wild accessions or wild relatives of a species. 
     “USDA descriptors” are the plant variety descriptors described for tomato in the “Objective description of Variety Tomato  Solanum lycopersicum ”, ST-470-55 (as published by U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office, Beltsville, Md. 20705 (available on the world wide web at ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/) and which can be downloaded from the world wide web at ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELDEV3003738. 
     “UPOV descriptors” are the plant variety descriptors described for tomato in the “Guidelines for the Conduct of Tests for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability, TG/44/10 (Geneva 2001), as published by UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Varieties and Plants, available on the world wide web at upov.int) and which can be downloaded from the world wide web at upov.int/en/publications/tg-rom/tg044/tg — 44 — 10.pdf and is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. 
     “RHS” refers to the Royal Horticultural Society of England which publishes an official botanical color chart quantitatively identifying colors according to a defined numbering system. The chart may be purchased from Royal Horticulture Society Enterprise Ltd RHS Garden; Wisley, Woking; Surrey GU236QB, UK, e.g., the RHS colour chart: 2007 (The Royal Horticultural Society, charity No: 222879, PO Box 313 London SW1P2PE; sold by, e.g., TORSO-VERLAG, Obere Grüben 8-D-97877 Wertheim, Article-No.: Art62-00008 EAN-Nr.: 4250193402112). 
     “Genotype” refers to the genetic composition of a cell or organism. 
     “Phenotype” refers to the detectable characteristics of a cell or organism, which characteristics are the manifestation of gene expression. 
     As used herein, the term “plant” includes the whole plant or any parts or derivatives thereof, preferably having the same genetic makeup as the plant from which it is obtained, such as plant organs (e.g. harvested or non-harvested tomato fruits), plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell and/or tissue cultures from which whole plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant cell clumps, plant transplants, seedlings, hypocotyl, cotyledon, plant cells that are intact in plants, plant clones or micropropagations, or parts of plants (e.g. harvested tissues or organs), such as plant cuttings, vegetative propagations, embryos, pollen, ovules, flowers, leaves, seeds, clonally propagated plants, roots, stems, root tips, grafts, parts of any of these and the like. Also any developmental stage is included, such as seedlings, cuttings prior or after rooting, mature plants or leaves. 
     “Harvested plant material” refers herein to plant parts (e.g. a fruit detached from the whole plant) which have been collected for further storage and/or further use. 
     “Harvested seeds” refers to seeds harvested from a line or variety, e.g. produced after self-fertilization or cross-fertilization and collected. 
     “Rootstock” or “stock” refers to the plant selected for its roots, in particular for the resistance of the roots to diseases or stress (e.g. heat, cold, salinity etc). Normally the quality of the fruit of the plant providing the rootstock is less important. 
     “Scion” refers to a part of the plant that is attached to the rootstock. This plant is selected for its stems, leaves, flowers, or fruits. The scion contains the desired genes to be duplicated in future production by the stock/scion plant and may produce the desired tomato fruit. 
     “Stock/scion” plant refers to a tomato plant comprising a rootstock from one plant grafted to a scion from another plant. 
     “Grafting” refers to attaching tissue from one plant to another plant so that the vascular tissues of the two tissues join together. Grafting may be done using methods known in the art like: Tongue Approach/Approach Graft, 2) Hole insertion/Terminal/Top Insertion Graft, 3) One Cotyledon/Slant/Splice/Tube Graft and 4) Cleft/Side Insertion Graft 
     “Distinguishing characteristics” or “distinguishing morphological and/or physiological characteristics” refers herein the characteristics which are distinguishing between ENHANCER and other tomato varieties, such as Multifort, when grown under the same environmental conditions, especially the following characteristics: 1) leaflet length; 2) leaflet width; 3) type of inflorescence; 4) number of flowers in inflorescence; 5) grams weight of mature fruit; 6) length of the mature fruit (stem axis); or 7) diameter of fruit at widest point 
     In one aspect, the distinguishing characteristics further include at least one, two, three or more (or all) of the characteristics listed in Table 1. Thus, a tomato plant “comprising the distinguishing characteristics of ENHANCER”, refers herein to a tomato plant which does not differ significantly from ENHANCER in characteristics 1) to 4) above. In a further aspect the tomato plant further does not differ significantly from ENHANCER in one or more, or all characteristics 5) to 7) as mentioned above. In yet a further aspect the tomato plant further does not differ in at least one, two, three, four, five or six characteristics selected from the characteristics listed in Table 1. 
     A plant having “(essentially) all the physiological and morphological characteristics” means a plant having essentially all or all the physiological and morphological characteristics when grown under the same environmental conditions of the plant of ENHANCER from which it was derived, e.g. the progenitor plant, the parent, the recurrent parent, the plant used for tissue- or cell culture, etc. The skilled person will understand that a comparison between tomato varieties should occur when said varieties are grown under the same environmental conditions. For example, the plant may have all characteristics mentioned in Table 1. In certain embodiments, the plant having “essentially all the physiological and morphological characteristics” are plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics, except for certain characteristics, such as one, two or three, mentioned, e.g. the characteristic(s) derived from a converted or introduced gene or trait and/or except for the characteristics which differ in an EDV. So, the plant may have all characteristics mentioned in Table 1, except for one, two or three characteristics of Table 1, in which the plant may thus differ. 
     A plant having one or more or all “essential physiological and/or morphological characteristics” or one or more “distinguishing characteristics” (such as one, two, three, four or five) refers to a plant having (or retaining) one or more, or all, or retaining all except one, two or three of the distinguishing characteristics mentioned in Table 1 when grown under the same environmental conditions that distinguish ENHANCER from most similar variety MULTIFORT such distinguishing characteristics being selected from (but not limited to): a deeply toothed or cut (sps. towards base) margin of major leaflets (USDA criterion), no fasciation of first flower of 2 nd  or 3 rd  inflorescence (USDA criterion) and resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) (USDA criterion). 
     The physiological and/or morphological characteristics mentioned above are commonly evaluated at significance levels of 1%, 5%, 8% or 10% significance level, when measured under the same environmental conditions. For example, a progeny plant of ENHANCER may have one or more (or all, or all except one, two or three) of the essential physiological and/or morphological characteristics of ENHANCER listed in Table 1, or one or more or all (or all except one, two or three) of the distinguishing characteristics of ENHANCER listed in Table 1 and above, as determined at the 1% or 5% significance level when grown under the same environmental conditions. 
     As used herein, the term “variety” or “cultivar” means a plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of a breeder&#39;s right are fully met, can be defined by the expression of the characteristics resulting from a given genotype or combination of genotypes, distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said characteristics and considered as a unit with regard to its suitability for being propagated unchanged. 
     The terms “gene converted” or “conversion plant” in this context refer to tomato plants which are often developed by backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of parent are recovered in addition to the one or more genes transferred into the parent via the backcrossing technique or via genetic engineering. Likewise a “Single Locus Converted (Conversion) Plant” refers to plants which are often developed by plant breeding techniques comprising or consisting of backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a tomato variety are recovered in addition to the characteristics of the single locus having been transferred into the variety via, e.g., the backcrossing technique and/or by genetic transformation. Likewise, a double loci converted plant/a triple loci converted plant refers to plants having essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of given variety, expect that at two or three loci, respectively, it contains the genetic material (e.g., an allele) from a different variety. 
     A variety is referred to as an “Essentially Derived Variety” (EDV) i.e., shall be deemed to be essentially derived from another variety, “the initial variety” when (i) it is predominantly derived from the initial variety, or from a variety that is itself predominantly derived from the initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of the initial variety; (ii) it is clearly distinguishable from the initial variety; and (iii) except for the differences which result from the act of derivation, it conforms to the initial variety in the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of the initial variety. Thus, an EDV may be obtained for example by the selection of a natural or induced mutant, or of a somaclonal variant, the selection of a variant individual from plants of the initial variety, backcrossing, or transformation by genetic engineering. In one embodiment, an EDV is a gene converted plant. 
     “Plant line” is for example a breeding line which can be used to develop one or more varieties. 
     “Hybrid variety” or “F1 hybrid” refers to the seeds of the first generation progeny of the cross of two non-isogenic plants. For example, the female parent is pollinated with pollen of the male parent to produce hybrid (F1) seeds on the female parent. 
     “Progeny” as used herein refers to plants derived from a plant designated ENHANCER. Progeny may be derived by regeneration of cell culture or tissue culture or parts of a plant designated ENHANCER or selfing of a plant designated ENHANCER or by producing seeds of a plant designated ENHANCER. In further embodiments, progeny may also encompass plants derived from crossing of at least one plant designated ENHANCER with another tomato plant of the same or another variety or (breeding) line, or with a wild tomato plant, backcrossing, inserting of a locus into a plant or selecting a plant comprising a mutation or selecting a variant. A progeny is, e.g., a first generation progeny, i.e. the progeny is directly derived from, obtained from, obtainable from or derivable from the parent plant by, e.g., traditional breeding methods (selfing and/or crossing) or regeneration. However, the term “progeny” generally encompasses further generations such as second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh or more generations, i.e., generations of plants which are derived from, obtained from, obtainable from or derivable from the former generation by, e.g., traditional breeding methods, regeneration or genetic transformation techniques. For example, a second generation progeny can be produced from a first generation progeny by any of the methods mentioned above. Especially progeny of ENHANCER which are EDVs or which retain all (or all except 1, 2 or 3) physiological and/or morphological characteristics of ENHANCER listed in Table 1, or which retain all (or all except 1, 2, or 3) of the distinguishing characteristics of ENHANCER described elsewhere herein and in Table 1, are encompassed herein. 
     The term “traditional breeding techniques” encompasses herein crossing, selfing, selection, double haploid production, embryo rescue, protoplast fusion, marker assisted selection, mutation breeding etc. as known to the breeder (i.e. methods other than genetic modification/transformation/transgenic methods), by which, for example, a genetically heritable trait can be transferred from one tomato line or variety to another. 
     “Crossing” refers to the mating of two parent plants. The term encompasses “cross-pollination” and “selfing”. 
     “Cross-pollination” refers to the fertilization by the union of two gametes from different plants. 
     “Backcrossing” is a traditional breeding technique used to introduce a trait into a plant line or variety. The plant containing the trait is called the donor plant and the plant into which the trait is transferred is called the recurrent parent. An initial cross is made between the donor parent and the recurrent parent to produce progeny plants. Progeny plants which have the trait are then crossed to the recurrent parent. After several generations of backcrossing and/or selfing the recurrent parent comprises the trait of the donor. The plant generated in this way may be referred to as a “single trait converted plant”. 
     “Selfing” refers to self-pollination of a plant, i.e., the transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma of the same plant. 
     “Regeneration” refers to the development of a plant from cell culture or tissue culture or vegetative propagation. 
     “Vegetative propagation”, “vegetative reproduction” or “clonal propagation” are used interchangeably herein and mean the method of taking part of a plant and allowing that plant part to form at least roots where plant part is, e.g., defined as or derived from (e.g. by cutting of) leaf, pollen, embryo, cotyledon, hypocotyl, cells, protoplasts, meristematic cell, root, root tip, pistil, anther, flower, shoot tip, shoot, stem, petiole, etc. When a whole plant is regenerated by vegetative propagation, it is also referred to as a vegetative propagation. 
     “Locus” (plural loci) refers to the specific location of a gene or DNA sequence on a chromosome. A locus may confer a specific trait. 
     “Linkage” refers to a phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their transmission was independent. 
     “Marker” refers to a readily detectable phenotype, preferably inherited in codominant fashion (both alleles at a locus in a diploid heterozygote are readily detectable), with no environmental variance component, i.e., a heritability of 1. 
     “Allele” refers to one or more alternative forms of a gene locus. All of these loci relate to one trait. Sometimes, different alleles can result in different observable phenotypic traits, such as different pigmentation. However, many variations at the genetic level result in little or no observable variation. If a multicellular organism has two sets of chromosomes, i.e. diploid, these chromosomes are referred to as homologous chromosomes. Diploid organisms have one copy of each gene (and therefore one allele) on each chromosome. If both alleles are the same, they are homozygotes. If the alleles are different, they are heterozygotes. 
     As used herein, the terms “resistance” and “tolerance” are used interchangeably to describe plants that show no symptoms to a specified biotic pest, pathogen, abiotic influence or environmental condition. These terms are also used to describe plants showing some symptoms but that are still able to produce marketable product with an acceptable yield. Some plants that are referred to as resistant or tolerant are only so in the sense that they may still produce a crop, even though the plants are stunted and the yield is reduced. 
     “Tissue Culture” refers to a composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a plant. 
     “Transgene” or “chimeric gene” refers to a genetic locus comprising a DNA sequence which has been introduced into the genome of a tomato plant by transformation. A plant comprising a transgene stably integrated into its genome is referred to as “transgenic plant”. 
     “Haploid” refers to a cell or organism having one set of the two sets of chromosomes in a diploid. 
     “Diploid” refers to a cell or organism having two sets of chromosomes. 
     “Polyploid” refers to a cell or organism having three or more complete sets of chromosomes. 
     “Triploid” refers to a cell or organism having three sets of chromosomes. 
     “Tetraploid” refers to a cell or organism having four sets of chromosomes. 
     “Average” refers herein to the arithmetic mean. 
     The term “mean” refers to the arithmetic mean of several measurements. The skilled person understands that the appearance of a plant depends to some extent on the growing conditions of said plant. Thus, the skilled person will know typical growing conditions for tomato described herein. The mean, if not indicated otherwise within this application, refers to the arithmetic mean of measurements on at least 10 different, randomly selected plants of a variety or line. 
     “Substantially equivalent” refers to a characteristic that, when compared, does not show a statistically significant difference (e.g., p=0.05) from the mean. 
     A progeny plant may comprise the distinguishing characteristics 1 to 4 or 1 to 7 of ENHANCER; and/or have essentially all physiological and morphological characteristics of the variety designated ENHANCER when grown under the same environmental conditions. 
     An “Essentially Derived Variety” (EDV) shall be deemed to be essentially derived from another variety, “the initial variety”, under the following circumstances: (i) it is predominantly derived from the initial variety, or from a variety that is itself predominantly derived from the initial variety, while retaining the expression of essentially all characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of the initial variety; and (ii) it is clearly distinguishable from the initial variety (e.g., one, one or more, two, two or more, three, three or more characteristics are different from the initial variety); and (iii) except for the differences which result from the act of derivation, it conforms to the initial variety in the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of the initial variety. Thus, an EDV may be obtained for example by the selection of a natural or induced mutant, or of a somaclonal variant, the selection of a variant individual from plants of the initial variety, backcrossing, or transformation by genetic engineering. Such a variant may be selected at any time, e.g. in the field or greenhouse, during breeding, during or after in vitro culture of cells or tissues, during regeneration of plants, etc. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention provides methods and compositions relating to plants, plant parts, seeds and progenies of tomato variety ENHANCER. 
     Variety ENHANCER is most similar to the commercially available variety Multifort. However, Enhancer differs from Multifort in one or more, e.g., at least two, at least three, at least four, or more, optionally all morphological and/or physiological characteristics listed in the following (see USDA criteria and also Table 1), when grown under the same environmental conditions: 
     Enhancer has a leaflet length that is at least about 12%, or preferably 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, or even about 22.5% smaller than the leaflet length of Multifort; 
     Enhancer has a leaflet width that is at least about 7%, or preferably 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, or even about 13.6% smaller than the leaflet width of Multifort; 
     Enhancer has a simple type of inflorescence, whereas Multifort has a forked type of inflorescence; 
     Enhancer has a number of flowers in inflorescence that is at least about 30%, or preferably 31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, or even about 39.6% smaller than the number of flowers in inflorescence of Multifort; 
     Enhancer has a weight of mature fruit that is at least about 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%, 105%, or even about 109.4% heavier than the weight of mature fruit of Multifort; 
     Enhancer has a length of mature fruit (stem axis) that is at least about 10%, or preferably 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, or even about 18% bigger than the length of mature fruit of Multifort; 
     Enhancer has a diameter of fruit at widest point that is at least about 15%, or preferably 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, or even about 24.4% bigger than the diameter of fruit at widest point of Multifort; 
     Enhancer has a greenish-orange fruit color when fully ripe, e.g. RHS Yellow-Orange 22A, whereas Multifort has a greenish-yellow fruit color, e.g. RHS Greyed-Yellow 160A; 
     Enhancer has a pink flesh color when fully ripe, whereas Multifort has a yellow flesh color when fully ripe. 
     Development of ENHANCER 
     The hybrid ENHANCER was developed from a cross between a male that is a wild tomato ( Solanum habrochaites ) and a female proprietary inbred line of Nunhems that is a normal tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ), the F1 hybrid between these two is Enhancer. The male parent brings to the hybrid a strong root system and the possibility to bear fruits for long time and to have many clusters on the vine with good size and quality, the female brings to the hybrid a rootstock with resistance to soil diseases. 
     The seeds of ENHANCER can be grown to produce hybrid plants and parts thereof (e.g. rootstock or tomato fruit). The hybrid ENHANCER can be propagated by seeds or vegetative. 
     The hybrid variety is uniform and genetically stable. This has been established through evaluation of horticultural characteristics. Several hybrid seed production events resulted in no observable deviation in genetic stability. Coupled with the confirmation of genetic stability of the female and male parents the Applicant concluded that ENHANCER is uniform and stable. A rootstock of the hybrid ENHANCER with a grafted scion result in a very strong plant with a strong root system, good soil born disease resistance and a good fruit quality for long period of time. 
     MULTIFORT is considered to be the most similar variety to ENHANCER. MULTIFORT is a commercial variety from Paramount Seeds Inc. In Table 1 a comparison between ENHANCER and MULTIFORT is shown based on a trial in the USA. Trial location I: Acampo, Calif., USA (coordinates: 38° 192873″N 121° 232637″W). Transplanting date: Jul. 3, 2013. Trial period July-September 2013. 
     Two replications of 50 plants each, from which 15 plants or plant parts were randomly selected, were used to measure characteristics. In Table 1 the USDA descriptors of ENHANCER (this application) and reference MULTIFORT (commercial variety) are listed. 
     In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics of tomato variety ENHANCER. A description of the physiological and morphological characteristics of tomato variety ENHANCER is presented in Table 1. 
                                                 TABLE 1                   Comparison between ENHANCER and MULTIFORT                ENHANCER   MULTIFORT                        1. Seedling               Anthocyanin in hypocotyl   2   2       1 = absent, 2 = present       habit of 3-4 week old seedling   1   1       1 = normal, 2 = compact       2. Mature plant       CM Height   NA   NA       Growth   1   1       1 = indeterminate, 2 = determinate       Form   1   1       1 = lax, open, 2 = normal, 3 = compact, 4 = dwarf,       5 = brachytic       Size of canopy   3   3       1 = small, 2 = medium, 3 = large       Habit   1   1       1 = sprawling (decumbent), 2 = semi-erect,       3 = erect (‘dwarf champion’)       3. Stem       Branching   1   1       1 = sparse, 2 = intermediate, 3 = profuse       Branching at cotyledonary or first leafy node   2   2       1 = present, 2 = absent       pubescence of younger stems   3   3       1 = smooth (no long hairs), 2 = sparsely hairy       (scattered long hairs), 3 = moderately hairy,       4 = densely hairy or wooly       4. Leaf       Type   1   1       1 = tomato, 2 = potato       margins of major leaflets   2   2       1 = nearly entire, 2 = shallowly toothed or       scalloped, 3 = deeply toothed or cut, sps.       Toward base       marginal rolling or wiltiness   1   1       1 = absent, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, 4 = strong       onset of leaflet rolling   na   NA       1 = early-season, 2 = mid-season, 3 = late season       surface of major leaflets   2   2       1 = smooth, 2 = rugose (bumpy or veiny)       pubescence   3   3       1 = smooth (no long hairs), 2 = normal,       3 = hirsute, 4 = wooly       5. Inflorescence       Type   1   2       1 = simple, 2 = forked, 3 = compound       Number of flowers in inflorescence   7.6    12.6       Leafy or “running” inflorescences   1   1       1 = absent, 2 = occasional, 3 = frequent       6. Flower       calyx   1   1       1 = normal, lobes awl-shaped, 2 = macrocalyx,       lobes large, leaflike, 3 = fleshy       calyx-lobes   1   1       1 = shorter the corolla, 2 = approx. equalling       corolla, 3 = distinctly longer than corolla       corolla color   1   1       1 = yellow, 2 = old gold, 3 = white or tan       style pubescence   3   3       1 = absent, 2 = sparse, 3 = dense       anthers   1   1       1 = all fused into tube, 2 = separateing into 2 or       more groups at anthesis       fasciation   1   1       1 = absent, 2 = occassionally present,       3 = frequently present       7. fruit       typical fruit shape   3   3       shape of transverse section   1   1       shape of blossom end   2   2       shape of stem end   1   1       shape of pistil scar   1   1       abscission layer   1   1       1 = present (pedicellate), 2 = absent (jointless)       point of detachment of fruit at harvest   1   1       1 = at pedicel joint, 2 = at calyx attachment       mm length of mature fruit (stem axis)   23.47    19.9       MM diameter of fruit at widest point   24.65    19.8       G weight of mature fruit   8.9     4.25       No. of locules   1   1       1 = two, 2 = three, 3 = five or more       fruit surface1 = smooth, 2 = slightly rough,   4   4       3 = moderately rough or ribbed, 4 = pubescent       (fuzzy)       fruit base color   2, RHS Greyed-   2, RHS Greyed-       1 = light green, 2 = light gray-green, 3 = apple or   Green 193A   Green 194C       medium green, 4 = yellow green, 5 = dark green       fruit pattern   3 (single stripe)   3 (single stripe)       1 = uniform green, 2 = green-shouldered,       3 = radial stripes on sides of fruit       fruit color, full ripe   8, Greenish-Orange,   2, Greenish-Yellow,       8 = other color   RHS Yellow-Orange   RHS Greyed           22A   Yellow 160A       flesh color, full ripe   2   1       1 = yellow, 2 = pink, 3 = red/crimson, 4 = orange,       5 = other, specify       flesh color   NA   1       1 = uniform, 2 = with lighter and darker areas in       walls       locular gel color of table-ripe fruit   1   1       1 = green, 2 = yellow, 3 = red       ripening   1   1       1 = blossom-to-stem end, 2 = uniform       ripening   1   1       1 = inside out, 2 = uniformly, 3 = outside in       stem scar size   1   1       1 = small, 2 = medium, 3 = large       core   1   1       1 = coreless, 2 = present       epidermis color   1   1       1 = colorless, 2 = yellow       epidermis   1   1       1 = normal, 2 = easy-peel       epidermis texture   1   1       1 = tender, 2 = average, 3 = tough       9. Disease and Pest Reaction       1 highly resistant, 2 intermediate resistance, 3       susceptible, 4 not determined         Verticillium dahliae  (Va and Vd)   1   1         Fusarium oxysporum  F0   1   1         Fusarium oxysporum  F1   1   1         Fusarium oxysporum  F2 (Ex F3)   1   1       Tomato Mosaic Virus (Tm)   1   1       Tomato Spotted TSWV   1         Fusarium oxysporum  f. sp.  radicis lycopersici     1   1       (For)         Fulvia fulva  (Ff) (ex  Cladosporium fulvum )   1   1       (Ce)       Nematodes (Ne)   2   2         Pyrenochaeta lycopersici  (Pl) or (Pyl)   2   2       10. Chemistry and composition of full-ripe       fruits       Soluble solids as ‘Brix’   7.01     7.7       11. Phenology       Fruiting season   1/NA**   NA**       1 = long, 2 = medium, 3 = short, concentrated,       4 = very concentrated       Relative maturity in areas tested   5/NA**    5**       1 = early, 2 = medium early, 3 = medium,       4 = medium late, 5 = late, 6 = variable       12. Adaptation       Culture   2, 1   2, 1       1 = field, 2 = greenhouse       Principle use   5, root stock   5, root stock       5 = other (specify)       core   1   1       1 = coreless, 2 = present               *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention.       **Fruits do not ripen well.       NA means data is not available.            
Breeding of Tomato Plants of the Invention
 
     One aspect of the current invention concerns methods for crossing a tomato variety provided herein with itself or a second plant and the seeds and plants produced by such methods. These methods can be used for propagation of a variety provided herein, or can be used to produce hybrid tomato seeds and the plants grown therefrom. Such hybrid seeds can be produced by crossing the parent varieties of the variety. 
     The development of new varieties using one or more starting varieties is well known in the art. In accordance with the invention, novel varieties may be created by crossing a plant of the invention followed by multiple generations of breeding according to such well known methods. New varieties may be created by crossing with any second plant. In selecting such a second plant to cross for the purpose of developing novel varieties, it may be desired to choose those plants that either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or that exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination. Once initial crosses have been made, inbreeding and selection take place to produce new varieties. For development of a uniform variety, often five or more generations of selfing and selection are involved. 
     Uniform varieties of new varieties may also be developed by way of double-haploids. This technique allows the creation of true breeding varieties without the need for multiple generations of selfing and selection. In this manner, true breeding varieties can be produced in as little as one generation. Haploid embryos may be produced from microspores, pollen, anther cultures, or ovary cultures. The haploid embryos may then be doubled autonomously, or by chemical treatments (e.g. colchicine treatment). Alternatively, haploid embryos may be grown into haploid plants and treated to induce chromosome doubling. In either case, fertile homozygous plants are obtained. In accordance with the invention, any of such techniques may be used in connection with a plant of the invention and progeny thereof to achieve a homozygous variety. 
     Backcrossing can also be used to improve an inbred plant. Backcrossing transfers one or more heritable traits from one inbred or non-inbred source to an inbred that lacks those traits. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic(s) or trait(s) being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. When the term variety ENHANCER is used in the context of the present invention, this also includes plants modified to include at least a first desired heritable trait such as one, two or three desired heritable trait(s). 
     This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior inbred (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate genetic information (e.g., an allele) at the locus or loci relevant to the trait in question. The progeny of this cross are then mated back to the recurrent parent followed by selection in the resultant progeny (first backcross generation, or BC1) for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny are heterozygous at loci controlling the characteristic being transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other loci. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure breeding progeny for the trait being transferred. 
     The parental tomato plant which contributes the desired characteristic or characteristics is termed the non-recurrent parent because it can be used one time in the backcross protocol and therefore need not recur. The parental tomato plant to which the locus or loci from the non-recurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol. 
     Many single locus traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single locus traits may or may not be transgenic; examples of these traits include, but are not limited to, male sterility, herbicide resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, restoration of male fertility, modified fatty acid or carbohydrate metabolism, and enhanced nutritional quality. These comprise genes generally inherited through the nucleus. 
     Direct selection or screening may be applied where the single locus (e.g. allele) acts in a dominant fashion. For example, when selecting for a dominant allele providing resistance to a bacterial disease, the progeny of the initial cross can be inoculated with bacteria prior to the backcrossing. The inoculation then eliminates those plants which do not have the resistance, and only those plants which have the resistance allele are used in the subsequent backcross. This process is then repeated for all additional backcross generations. 
     Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, recessive, co-dominant and quantitative alleles may also be transferred. In this instance, it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired locus has been successfully transferred. In the case where the non-recurrent variety was not homozygous, the F1 progeny would not be equivalent. F1 plants having the desired genotype at the locus of interest could be phenotypically selected if the corresponding trait was phenotypically detectable in a heterozygous or hemizygous state. In the case where a recessive allele is to be transferred and the corresponding trait is not phenotypically detectable in the heterozygous of hemizygous state, the resultant progeny can be selfed, or crossed back to the donor to create a segregating population for selection purposes. Non-phenotypic tests may also be employed. Selected progeny from the segregating population can then be crossed to the recurrent parent to make the first backcross generation (BC1). 
     Molecular markers may also be used to aid in the identification of the plants containing both a desired trait and having recovered a high percentage of the recurrent parent&#39;s genetic complement. Selection of tomato plants for breeding is not necessarily dependent on the phenotype of a plant and instead can be based on genetic investigations. For example, one can utilize a suitable genetic marker which is closely genetically linked to a trait of interest. One of these markers can be used to identify the presence or absence of a trait in the offspring of a particular cross, and can be used in selection of progeny for continued breeding. This technique is commonly referred to as marker assisted selection. Any other type of genetic marker or other assay that is able to identify the relative presence or absence of a trait of interest in a plant can also be useful for breeding purposes. Procedures for marker assisted selection applicable to the breeding of tomato are well known in the art. Such methods will be of particular utility in the case of recessive traits and variable phenotypes, or where conventional assays may be more expensive, time consuming or otherwise disadvantageous. Types of genetic markers which could be used in accordance with the invention include, but are not necessarily limited to, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs), Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). 
     Tomato varieties can also be developed from more than two parents. The technique, known as modified backcrossing, uses different recurrent parents during the backcrossing. Modified backcrossing may be used to replace the original recurrent parent with a variety having certain more desirable characteristics or multiple parents may be used to obtain different desirable characteristics from each. 
     Tomatoes are grown for use as rootstocks or scions. Typically, different types of tomatoes are grafted to enhance disease resistance, which is usually conferred by the rootstock, while retaining the horticultural qualities usually conferred by the scion. It is not uncommon for grafting to occur between  Solanum lycopersicum  varieties and related  Solanum  species. Methods of grafting and vegetative propagation are well-known in the art. 
     The varieties and varieties of the present invention are particularly well suited for the development of new varieties or varieties based on the elite nature of the genetic background of the variety. In selecting a second plant to cross with ENHANCER for the purpose of developing novel tomato varieties, it will typically be preferred to choose those plants that either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or that exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination. Examples of desirable characteristics may include, but are not limited to herbicide tolerance, pathogen resistance (e.g., insect resistance, nematode resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal, and viral disease), male fertility, improved harvest characteristics, enhanced nutritional quality, increased antioxidant content, improved processing characteristics, high yield, improved characteristics related to the fruit flavor, texture, size, shape, durability, shelf life, and yield, improved vine habit, increased soluble solids content, uniform ripening, delayed or early ripening, reduced blossom end scar size, seedling vigor, adaptability for soil conditions, and adaptability for climate conditions. Qualities that may be desirable in a processing tomato are not necessarily those that would be desirable in a fresh market tomato; thus, the selection process for desirable traits for each specific end use may be different. For example, certain features, such as solids content, and firm fruit to facilitate mechanical harvesting are more desirable in the development of processing tomatoes; whereas, external features such as intensity and uniformity of fruit color, unblemished fruit, and uniform fruit size are typically more important to the development of a fresh market product that will have greater retailer or consumer appeal. Of course, certain traits, such as disease and pest resistance, high yield, and concentrated fruit set are of interest in any type of tomato variety or variety. 
     In one aspect the invention relates to a tomato plant comprising a rootstock of ENHANCER, seeds of which having been deposited under NCIMB Accession Number 42423; and a scion of another tomato plant. 
     In a further aspect the invention relates to a method of producing a tomato plant comprising the steps of: (a) obtaining a rootstock from the plant designated ENHANCER; (b) obtaining a scion from a tomato plant; (c) connection the scion to the rootstock. Optionally, the rootstock/scion plant can be grown in a plant nursery until the vascular tissue of both the rootstock and scion are joined. In one aspect, the invention relates to a plant obtained by this method. 
     In another aspect the invention relates to an Essentially Derived Variety of ENHANCER, having one, two, or three physiological and/or morphological characteristics which are different from those of ENHANCER and which otherwise has all the physiological and morphological characteristics of ENHANCER, wherein a representative sample of seeds of ENHANCER has been deposited under NCIMB Accession Number 42423. 
     In still another aspect the invention relates to a tomato plant, or a part thereof, which does not significantly differ from ENHANCER in any of the distinguishing characteristics consisting of 1) leaflet length; 2) leaflet width; 3) type of inflorescence; 4) number of flowers in inflorescence; 5) grams weight of mature fruit; 6) length of the mature fruit (stem axis); or 7) diameter of fruit at widest point. In another embodiment, the plant does not significantly differ from ENHANCER in any of the characteristics of Table 1. 
     Plants of the Invention Derived by Genetic Engineering 
     Many useful traits that can be introduced by backcrossing, as well as directly into a plant, are those that are introduced by genetic transformation techniques. Genetic transformation may therefore be used to insert a selected transgene into the tomato variety of the invention or may, alternatively, be used for the preparation of varieties containing transgenes that can be subsequently transferred to the variety of interest by crossing. Methods for the transformation of plants, including tomato, are well known to those of skill in the art. Techniques which may be employed for the genetic transformation of tomato include, but are not limited to, electroporation, microprojectile bombardment,  Agrobacterium -mediated transformation, pollen-mediated transformation, and direct DNA uptake by protoplasts. 
     To effect transformation by electroporation, one may employ either friable tissues, such as a suspension culture of cells or embryogenic callus or alternatively one may transform immature embryos or other organized tissue directly. In this technique, one would partially degrade the cell walls of the chosen cells by exposing them to pectin-degrading enzymes (pectolyases) or mechanically wound tissues in a controlled manner. 
     To effect pollen-mediated transformation, one may apply pollen pretreated with DNA to the female reproduction parts of tomato plants for pollination. A pollen-mediated method for the transformation of tomato is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,806,399. 
     A particularly efficient method for delivering transforming DNA segments to plant cells is microprojectile bombardment. In this method, particles are coated with nucleic acids and delivered into cells by a propelling force. Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, platinum, and preferably, gold. For the bombardment, cells in suspension are concentrated on filters or solid culture medium. Alternatively, immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium. The cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate. 
     An illustrative embodiment of a method for delivering DNA into plant cells by acceleration is the BIOLISTICS Particle Delivery System, which can be used to propel particles coated with DNA or cells through a screen, such as a stainless steel or Nytex screen, onto a surface covered with target tomato cells. The screen disperses the particles so that they are not delivered to the recipient cells in large aggregates. It is believed that a screen intervening between the projectile apparatus and the cells to be bombarded reduces the size of projectiles aggregate and may contribute to a higher frequency of transformation by reducing the damage inflicted on the recipient cells by projectiles that are too large. 
     Microprojectile bombardment techniques are widely applicable, and may be used to transform virtually any plant species. 
       Agrobacterium -mediated transfer is another widely applicable system for introducing gene loci into plant cells. An advantage of the technique is that DNA can be introduced into whole plant tissues, thereby bypassing the need for regeneration of an intact plant from a protoplast. Modern  Agrobacterium  transformation vectors are capable of replication in  E. coli  as well as  Agrobacterium , allowing for convenient manipulations. Moreover, recent technological advances in vectors for  Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer have improved the arrangement of genes and restriction sites in the vectors to facilitate the construction of vectors capable of expressing various polypeptide coding genes. The vectors described have convenient multi-linker regions flanked by a promoter and a polyadenylation site for direct expression of inserted polypeptide coding genes. Additionally,  Agrobacterium  containing both armed and disarmed Ti genes can be used for transformation. 
     In those plant species where  Agrobacterium -mediated transformation is efficient, it is the method of choice because of the facile and defined nature of the gene locus transfer. The use of  Agrobacterium -mediated plant integrating vectors to introduce DNA into plant cells is well known in the art (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055). 
     Transformation of plant protoplasts also can be achieved using methods based on calcium phosphate precipitation, polyethylene glycol treatment, electroporation, and combinations of these treatments which are well known in the art. Transformation of plants and expression of foreign genetic elements is exemplified in Choi et al. (1994), and Ellul et al. (2003). 
     A number of promoters have utility for plant gene expression for any gene of interest including but not limited to selectable markers, scoreable markers, genes for pest tolerance, disease resistance, nutritional enhancements and any other gene of agronomic interest. Examples of constitutive promoters useful for tomato plant gene expression include, but are not limited to, the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) P-35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level expression in most plant tissues, including monocots; a tandemly, partially duplicated version of the CaMV 35S promoter, the enhanced 35S promoter (P-e35S) the nopaline synthase promoter, the octopine synthase promoter; and the figwort mosaic virus (P-FMV) promoter (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619) and an enhanced version of the FMV promoter (P-eFMV) where the promoter sequence of P-FMV is duplicated in tandem, the cauliflower mosaic virus 19S promoter, a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter, a commelina yellow mottle virus promoter, and other plant DNA virus promoters known to express in plant cells. 
     A variety of plant gene promoters that are regulated in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, and/or developmental signals can be used for expression of an operably linked gene in plant cells, including promoters regulated by (1) heat, (2) light (e.g., pea rbcS-3A promoter; maize rbcS promoter; or chlorophyll a/b-binding protein promoter), (3) hormones, such as abscisic acid, (4) wounding; or (5) chemicals such as methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, or Safener. It may also be advantageous to employ organ-specific promoters. 
     Exemplary nucleic acids which may be introduced to the tomato varieties of this invention include, for example, DNA sequences or genes from another species, or even genes or sequences which originate with or are present in the same species, but are incorporated into recipient cells by genetic engineering methods rather than classical reproduction or breeding techniques. However, the term “exogenous” is also intended to refer to genes that are not normally present in the cell being transformed, or perhaps simply not present in the form, structure, etc., as found in the transforming DNA segment or gene, or genes which are normally present and that one desires to express in a manner that differs from the natural expression pattern, e.g., to over-express. Thus, the term “exogenous” gene or DNA is intended to refer to any gene or DNA segment that is introduced into a recipient cell, regardless of whether a similar gene may already be present in such a cell. The type of DNA included in the exogenous DNA can include DNA which is already present in the plant cell, DNA from another plant, DNA from a different organism, or a DNA generated externally, such as a DNA sequence containing an antisense message of a gene, or a DNA sequence encoding a synthetic or modified version of a gene. 
     Many hundreds if not thousands of different genes are known and could potentially be introduced into a tomato plant according to the invention. Non-limiting examples of particular genes and corresponding phenotypes one may choose to introduce into a tomato plant include one or more genes for insect tolerance, such as a  Bacillus thuringiensis  (B.t.) gene, pest tolerance such as genes for fungal disease control, herbicide tolerance such as genes conferring glyphosate tolerance, and genes for quality improvements such as yield, nutritional enhancements, environmental or stress tolerances, or any desirable changes in plant physiology, growth, development, morphology or plant product(s). For example, structural genes would include any gene that confers insect tolerance including but not limited to a  Bacillus  insect control protein gene as described in WO 99/31248, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,052, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,365 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,275, herein incorporated by reference it their entirety. In another embodiment, the structural gene can confer tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate as conferred by genes including, but not limited to  Agrobacterium  strain CP4 glyphosate resistant EPSPS gene (aroA:CP4) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, or glyphosate oxidoreductase gene (GOX) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,175, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. 
     Alternatively, the DNA coding sequences can affect these phenotypes by encoding a non-translatable RNA molecule that causes the targeted inhibition of expression of an endogenous gene, for example via antisense- or cosuppression-mediated mechanisms. The RNA could also be a catalytic RNA molecule (e.g., a ribozyme) engineered to cleave a desired endogenous mRNA product. Thus, any gene which produces a protein or mRNA which expresses a phenotype or morphology change of interest is useful for the practice of the present invention. 
     Deposit Information 
     A total of 2500 seeds of the hybrid variety ENHANCER were deposited according to the Budapest Treaty by Nunhems B.V. on Jun. 19, 2015, at the NCIMB Ltd., Ferguson Building, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA, United Kingdom (NCIMB). The deposit has been assigned Accession Number NCIMB 42423. 
     A deposit of ENHANCER and of the male and female parent line is also maintained at Nunhems B.V. Access to the deposit will be available during the pendency of this application to persons determined by the Director of the U.S. Patent Office to be entitled thereto upon request. Subject to 37 C.F.R. §1.808(b), all restrictions imposed by the depositor on the availability to the public of the deposited material will be irrevocably removed upon the granting of the patent. The deposit will be maintained for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the most recent request, or for the enforceable life of the patent whichever is longer, and will be replaced if it ever becomes nonviable during that period. Applicant does not waive any rights granted under this patent on this application or under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 USC 2321 et seq.). 
     Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the invention, as limited only by the scope of the appended claims. 
     All references cited herein are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference. 
     REFERENCES 
     The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference:
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,175   U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,365   U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055   U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435   U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,052   U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,275   U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619   U.S. Pat. No. 6,806,399   WO 99/31248   EP 0 534 858   Choi et al., Plant Cell Rep., 13: 344-348, 1994.   Ellul et al., Theor. Appl. Genet., 107:462-469, 2003.