Abstract:
Method and apparatus for dynamically allocating IP addresses in a wireless IP network. IP address servers determine the requisite IP address pools and guard bands for individual network cells to guarantee fair access to the network and facilitate handoff host handoff from a prior cell to a new cell. IP address servers also prioritize handoff and resident hosts that request an IP address from the IP address server. In particular, IP address servers assign a higher priority to handoff hosts over resident hosts that request an IP address from an IP address server in order to maintain a preestablished handoff host network connection instead of dropping a handoff host connection in favor of a new resident host network connection. Finally, each cell is allocated a minimum number of IP addresses to ensure a certain level of fair access to the network regardless of the cell wherein a handoff or resident host resides.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
         [0001]    The present invention generally relates to wireless Internet Protocol (IP) networks. More specifically, this invention relates to dynamic allocation of IP addresses for wireless IP network cells.  
         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0002]    The advent of wireless IP networks has presented challenging problems in the area of dynamic IP address allocation. Wireless IP networks comprise a plurality of network cells wherein a plurality of handoff and resident hosts communicate with the wireless IP network. Handoff hosts are network hosts whose initial network connection was established in another cell and that subsequently migrate to a new network cell. In contrast, resident hosts are hosts whose initial network connection was established in the present cell and that have not migrated to another network cell. Each network cell further includes a base station that maintains handoff and resident host network connections within the network cell, and facilitates dynamic handoff of handoff hosts within its cell.  
           [0003]    The base station within each cell facilitates a network connection with its handoff and resident users through IP addresses assigned to the network hosts within the cell. Thus, an IP address must be allocated to the handoff and resident hosts within a cell to establish and maintain a network connection. The IP addresses dedicated to the handoff and resident hosts can be allocated by methods including an IP address server system(s) that assigns IP addresses for new hosts, and base stations themselves that may determine their own necessary IP address allocation. IP address servers that allocate IP addresses can include servers that are part of a base station itself, or can include IP address servers that are attached to the network and send IP addresses allocations to the base station within a cell. These IP address allocation methods and apparatuses confront a number of problems when allocating IP addresses to handoff and resident hosts within their cells.  
           [0004]    First, whenever a host initially establishes a network connection within a cell, the host is considered a resident host, because it establishes its initial network connection within the cell. In order for the resident host to establish its network connection, a base station within the cell must allocate an IP address from the cell&#39;s IP address pool to the resident host. In contrast, whenever a resident host migrates to a new cell after already having its network connection in a prior cell, the host becomes a handoff host, and the new cell must maintain the preexisting network connection of the handoff host. If the new cell has a different IP subnet address relative to the prior cell, the new cell must allocate a new IP address to the handoff host in order to maintain the handoff host&#39;s network connection from the prior cell.  
           [0005]    Current dynamic IP address allocation protocols such as Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) treat resident and handoff hosts as equivalent and without preference when allocating IP addresses to these hosts. Thus, a base station may allocate an IP address to a resident host instead of a handoff host, thereby permitting a new resident network connection in place of the prior network connection of a handoff host network, which must be dropped. This equal treatment is obviously undesirable, because denying a resident host an IP address will merely prevent a new network connection, whereas denying a handoff host an IP address causes its preexisting network connection to be terminated. Thus, IP address allocations to handoff hosts should be preferred to IP address allocation of resident hosts in order to facilitate the handoff of preexisting handoff host network connections.  
           [0006]    Second, the problem of handoff and resident host network access is further aggravated due to the fact that there is no minimum number of IP addresses that are reserved by individual cells to ensure a certain level of host access. The minimum number of IP addresses available will vary from cell to cell, and thus handoff and resident hosts will have differing degrees of access to the IP network based on the particular cell wherein the host is communicating with the network. As a result, fair access to the wireless IP network for handoff and resident hosts differs from cell to cell, because one cell may have significantly fewer IP addresses to allocate relative to another cell. This is another limitation of present IP address allocation protocols, because it is desirable to ensure fair access of handoff and resident hosts to the network regardless of the particular cell wherein these hosts reside.  
           [0007]    In sum, present dynamic IP address allocation protocols for wireless IP network systems suffer from two significant problems. First, these protocols treat resident and handoff hosts equally when allocating IP addresses, thereby causing preexisting handoff host network connections to be dropped in favor of new resident host network connections, when it is preferable to preserve a preexisting handoff host network connection by denying a new resident host network connection. Second, there is no minimum number of IP addresses allocated to individual cells, thereby causing fair access problems when different cells provide different numbers of IP addresses for handoff and resident hosts, thereby making network access arbitrarily dependent on the cell in which the handoff and network host reside.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0008]    These and other deficiencies in wireless network dynamic IP address allocation protocols are addressed by the present invention, which is a method and apparatus for dynamic IP address allocation for wireless base stations based on priorities and guard bands.  
           [0009]    The method of the system described herein includes several features. First, the total IP address pool of IP addresses for each cell is dynamically determined based on factors including base station demand, thereby ensuring adequate network access from cell to cell. Second, each cell is guaranteed a minimum number of IP addresses for its IP address pool, thereby ensuring a certain level of fair access to the network regardless of the cell wherein a host resides. Third, every cell includes a dynamic guard band of IP addresses reserved exclusively for handoff hosts, thereby mitigating handoff host network connection drops from cell to cell. Fourth, the allocation procedure for IP addresses prioritizes hosts that request IP addresses by favoring handoff hosts over resident hosts when allocating IP addresses, thereby maintaining preexisting network connections of handoff hosts instead of establishing new network connections of resident hosts.  
           [0010]    The method herein described is predictive, wherein the size of the IP address pool and guard band for each cell is determined by anticipating handoff and resident host demand on the cell before these hosts actually arrive. Demand predictions for these hosts are based on a number of factors including statistical assessment of IP address demand over time, such as prior days, weeks, and months, as well as real-time factors such as handoff and resident host data traffic levels and demand, and the numbers of handoff and resident hosts.  
           [0011]    The prioritization method herein described assigns different priorities to hosts that request an IP address from the present cell and then allocates an IP address to those hosts with a higher priority before those hosts with a lower priority. Thus, in order to prefer handoff hosts over resident hosts, handoff hosts are assigned a higher priority level over resident hosts and are allocated an IP address before resident hosts. In addition, handoff hosts are also inherently preferred over resident hosts due to the fact that a guard band of IP addresses is reserved exclusively for handoff host network connection handoffs within each cell.  
           [0012]    The apparatus used to implement this system is an IP address server system that predicts the IP address pool and guard band for each cell base station, establishes an IP address pool based on the anticipated demand, prioritizes host requests for IP addresses, and allocates IP addresses to hosts based on factors including their priority and whether they are a handoff or resident host. Implementation details for the IP address server system vary according to whether the system includes shared and/or dedicated IP address servers. Shared IP address servers predict and allocate IP addresses for multiple base stations within cells, whereas dedicated IP address servers predict and allocate IP addresses for their individual base station.  
           [0013]    In a shared IP address server system, a plurality of base stations share a pool of IP addresses with the same subnet address. The shared IP address server predicts the IP address pools and guard bands for each base station, and allocates the IP addresses for each base station accordingly. Thus, the shared IP address server centrally coordinates and allocates IP addresses for the plurality of base stations that it serves.  
           [0014]    In the alternative, each base station can perform its own IP address pool and guard band prediction and report the results to the shared IP address server, which makes a final decision on each base station&#39;s IP address pool and guard band size based on the aggregate predictions from the base stations. Thus, some of the processing demands to predict IP address pool and guard band size are offloaded from the shared IP address server to individual base stations, but the shared IP address server still makes the final determination of the IP address pool and guard band size for each base station from an overall system perspective.  
           [0015]    In a dedicated IP address server system, each base station includes its own dedicated server that independently predicts and determines its own IP address pool and guard band size subject to the limitations of overall system IP address availability. Such limitations guarantee fairness through mechanisms including a maximum limit on the number of IP addresses each cell can use. In order to dynamically adjust IP address pool and guard band size, each dedicated IP address server/base station can communicate with other dedicated IP address servers and base stations to communicate their IP address needs. Such communications allow individual base stations and dedicated IP address servers to respond to dynamic conditions, such as high IP address demand, by borrowing IP addresses from other dedicated IP address servers and base stations when necessary.  
           [0016]    Both shared and dedicated IP address server systems prioritize hosts that request IP addresses from the base station/IP address server, and then serve those hosts with a higher priority first. Thus, by assigning handoff hosts a higher priority relative to resident hosts, the IP address server allocates IP addresses to handoff hosts prior to resident hosts, thereby preventing dropped handoff host network connections at the expense of new resident host network connections. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0017]    The foregoing and other features of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description and drawings of illustrative embodiments of the invention in which:  
         [0018]    [0018]FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the general IP address predictive process of our invention;  
         [0019]    [0019]FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the general host prioritization process of our invention;  
         [0020]    [0020]FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the particular apparatus of a wireless IP network illustrative of one specific embodiment of our invention wherein a shared IP address server is utilized with base station requests;  
         [0021]    [0021]FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the process performed by the embodiment of FIG. 3 in accordance with our invention;  
         [0022]    [0022]FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the specific apparatus of a wireless IP network illustrative of another specific embodiment of our invention wherein a shared IP address server is utilized without base station requests;  
         [0023]    [0023]FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the process performed by the embodiment of FIG. 5 in accordance with our invention;  
         [0024]    [0024]FIG. 7 is a block diagram of another specific illustrative embodiment of our invention wherein each base station has a dedicated IP address server; and  
         [0025]    [0025]FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the process performed by the embodiment of FIG. 7 in accordance with our invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0026]    Referring now to FIG. 1, therein is shown our general IP address prediction process, wherein an IP address server system predicts the IP address pool and guard band size for individual base stations. By predicting the anticipated IP address pool and guard band size, the IP address server system can facilitate fair access to the wireless IP network regardless of the individual cell wherein a handoff or resident host resides.  
         [0027]    Our general IP address prediction process begins when the IP address server predicts the anticipated handoff host demand for IP addresses for base station(s) (step  2 ). The IP address server then predicts the anticipated resident network host demand for IP addresses for base station(s) (step  4 ). When performing both of these predictions, the IP address server may use any one of a number of standard predictive algorithms that include real-time and non-real time data processing to predict the anticipated handoff and cellular host demand.  
         [0028]    After predicting the handoff and resident host demand, the IP address server then predicts the total IP address pool necessary to support the predicted handoff and resident host demand (step  6 ). The determination of the total IP address pool is advantageously based on one or more of real time data including present network IP address demands associated with the base station, non-real time data including previous IP address demands associated with the base station, call blocking parameters, quality of service and performance parameters, and third party data including third party ISP address allocation specifications, quality of service parameters, or performance parameters. The IP address server further predicts the size of the guard band necessary to support the predicted handoffs from handoff hosts (step  8 ). Thus, the IP address server determines the requisite IP address pool and guard bands for base station(s) to support the anticipated handoff and resident host demand. Different mechanisms may be used to determine the size of the guard bands. For example, they can be statistically determined by studying the volume of IP address requirements over time. Statistics, such as time of day, mix of traffic, special situations (expected or unexpected) can be used to estimate the size of the guard bands. If needed, the IP address server can borrow additional IP addresses from a different base station.  
         [0029]    While in the embodiments of our invention depicted herein the steps of determining a guard band portion and assigning a priority level are advantageously performed in a predictive analysis module or software included within an IP address server or a base station, as described further below, they can also be performed in a separate software processor.  
         [0030]    Referring now to FIG. 2, therein is shown our general host prioritization process, wherein an IP address server prioritizes host requests for IP addresses. By prioritizing handoff hosts over resident hosts, the IP address server establishes a preference for handoff host handoff over new resident host network connections, thereby maintaining preestablished handoff host network connections.  
         [0031]    Our general host prioritization process begins when an IP address server receives an IP address request from a new handoff or cellular host (step  10 ). The IP address server determines the identity of the requesting host, including if it is a handoff or resident host (step  12 ). The IP address server then prioritizes the IP address request of the requesting host, and does so by designating handoff hosts as having a higher priority than resident hosts (step  14 ). The IP address server then allocates IP addresses to the requesting hosts in their order of priority whenever an appropriate IP address becomes available (step  16 ).  
         [0032]    Turning now to FIG. 3, there is depicted a block diagram of one illustrative embodiment of our invention. Each of a plurality of base stations or cells  20  can be accessed by an IP address server  22  for establishing communications between a base station  20  and a mobile terminal  24 . Each of the base stations  20  includes an IP address pool  26 . The IP address server  22  comprises a processor and memory and includes an IP address pool  28  and a predictive analysis module  29 . An address pool simply stores a list of available addresses, while an address server contains information to validate, update, and change address pools. In the network, the IP address server can reside in any one of a number of network elements, such as the Base Station Controller for the mobile network, the Mobile Switching Center, or can be incorporated into a stand alone piece of equipment. The processes described above with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 are performed by the predictive analysis module or software  24  of the IP address server  22 .  
         [0033]    The operation of the embodiment of FIG. 3 can be best understood with reference to FIG. 4. As noted above in this embodiment a single IP address server  22  operates as a shared server between multiple base stations  20 , and determines the IP address pools and guard bands for a plurality of base stations  20 . By determining the IP address pools and guard bands for a plurality of base stations, our invention is able to allocate a wider pool of IP addresses among a plurality of base stations, but does so at the cost of increased overhead.  
         [0034]    The process depicted in FIG. 4 begins when the shared IP address server  22  receives IP address requests from a plurality of base stations  20  (step  30 ). The shared IP address server  22  uses this information, along with other real-time and non-real-time data, to determine the IP address pools and guard bands for the plurality of base stations  20  for which it is responsible to allocate IP addresses (step  32 ). The shared IP address server  22  then allocates the appropriate IP addresses and guard bands to the individual base stations  20  based on its determination of the appropriate IP address pools and guard bands for these individual base stations  20  (step  34 ). The individual IP address servers  26  for the individual base stations  20  then field IP address requests from handoff and resident hosts and allocate IP addresses from their IP address pool  26  and guard band as designated by the shared IP address server (step  36 ).  
         [0035]    Turning now to FIG. 5, the embodiment of our invention therein depicted performs a hybrid shared IP process. In this embodiment the base stations  40  positioned between the mobile terminals  24  and the IP address server  42  each include an IP address pool  46  and a predictive analysis module or software  47 . The IP address server  42  again includes both the IP address pool  48  and the predictive analysis module or software  49 . Predictive analysis modules are included in both the base stations  40  and the IP address server  42  because the predictive analysis in the address server  42  will maintain state information and predict aggregate demand levels based upon multiple inputs from the base stations  40 . For instance, it can make decisions about future demands across multiple base stations. If one base station provides a predictive analysis that it will need X number of addresses in the next hour and a second base station provides a predictive analysis that it will need Y addresses in the next hour, the predictive analysis at the address server  42  can use historical data and information from the other base stations to determine the right number of addresses to allocate. Also the predictive analysis at the IP address server  42  can aggregate and categorize the data regarding the nature of the requests coming from the base stations, such as how many requests come from mobile hosts and how many come from resident hosts.  
         [0036]    In the operation of this embodiment a shared IP address server  42  still determines the IP address pool and guard bands for a plurality of base stations  40 , but the IP address server for each base station performs some of the predictive functions for its IP address pool and guard band, and then forwards its prediction to the shared IP address server, which makes the final IP address pool and guard band allocations for each base station based on the aggregate predictions from all the base station IP address servers.  
         [0037]    The hybrid shared IP address server system process begins when the individual IP address servers for each base station receive IP address requests from a plurality of handoff and resident hosts (step  50 ). Each base station&#39;s IP address server processes this information, along with other real-time and non-real-time data, to predict the IP address pool and guard band size for the base station (step  52 ). Each IP address server then forwards its prediction of its IP address pool and guard band size to the shared IP address server responsible for allocating IP address pools and guard bands for the particular base station (step  54 ).  
         [0038]    The shared IP address server processes the individual IP address pool and guard band predictions from the individual base stations (step  56 ), and then allocates the appropriate IP addresses and guard bands to the individual base stations based on the shared IP address server&#39;s determination of the appropriate IP address pools and guard bands for these individual base stations (step  58 ). Each individual IP address server for an individual base station then fields IP address requests from handoff and resident hosts and allocates IP addresses from its IP address pool and guard band as designated by the shared IP address server (step  59 ).  
         [0039]    Referring now to FIG. 7, there is depicted another illustrative embodiment of our invention wherein each base station  60  has, in addition to its IP address pool  66 , its own dedicated IP address server  62  including its predictive analysis software or module  67 . Each base station  60  can thus determine its own IP address pool and guard band without the oversight of a shared IP address server. The dedicated IP address servers  62  avoid the overhead associated with communicating with a separate shared server, but are constrained by overall IP address allocation limitations to ensure that an appropriate pool of IP addresses and guard bands is preserved for each individual base station.  
         [0040]    The dedicated IP address server system process of the embodiment of FIG. 7 is depicted in FIG. 8. The process begins when the dedicated IP address server  62  of a base station  60  receives IP address requests from handoff and resident hosts (step  70 ). The dedicated IP address server  60  processes this information, along with other real-time and non-real-time information and determines its individual IP address pool and guard band requirements (step  72 ). After determining its IP address pool and guard band requirements, the dedicated IP address server  62  communicates with other dedicated IP address servers  62  for other base stations  60  to borrow IP addresses as necessary to establish its IP address pool and guard band requirements (step  74 ). The dedicated IP address server  62  then allocates IP addresses from its IP address pool  66  based on its own independent determination of its IP address pool and guard band (step  76 ).  
         [0041]    A number of features of the present invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art. First, third parties such as wireless Internet Service Providers (ISPs) can control allocation of IP addresses to network cells. The present invention enables wireless and wireline ISPs to specify and control how IP addresses should be allocated to network cells in the wireless IP network, thereby allowing the ISP to allocate more IP addresses in specific network cells. For instance, an ISP may allocate more IP addresses to an area where high-paying customers reside so that network performance in that area is enhanced.  
         [0042]    When allocating IP addresses to cells, third-party ISPs may directly specify the number of IP addresses to allocate to each cell or geographical area that is covered by multiple network cells in order to support the third-party&#39;s services. A third-party may also specify performance objectives that can be achieved by a plurality of IP address allocations to the network cells, and then allow the IP address servers to allocate IP addresses to meet these performance objectives. For instance, a third-party may specify call blocking probabilities and quality of service for a geographical area, and then allow the wireless IP network address servers to determine the actual IP address allocations for cells within the geographical area to meet these performance objectives.  
         [0043]    While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.