Abstract:
A method is described for reducing interferences in a wireless network, by: identifying cells which experience more interference than others; identifying a group of PRBs that their transmissions are subjected to moire interference than other concurrent transmissions; identifying UEs associated with the group of PRBs, and determining whether the location of the UEs is at the cells&#39; edges; selecting a pair of UEs where one member is located at a first cell&#39;s edge and the other is located either (i) at a second cell, not included within a neighbors&#39; list of the first cell, or (ii) at the core or remote edge of a second cell. In case (i), the second cell is introduced to the first cell neighbors&#39; list, and in case (ii) the other UE is falsely defined as a UE located at the near second cell&#39;s edge. Then, ICIC procedure is invoked for that pair of UEs.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT International Application Serial No. PCT/IL2013/000080, filed on 23 Oct. 2013 and entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING INTER-CELL INTERFERENCE, which application claims the benefit of priority to 222709 filed on 25 Oct. 2012. The disclosures of the prior applications are considered part of and are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety in the disclosure of this application. 
     TECHNICAL FIELD 
     The invention relates to a system and a method for managing wireless networks, and in particularly to management of interference in cellular mobile communication systems. 
     BACKGROUND 
     In current cellular mobile broadband systems the achievable data rates are strongly dependent on the users&#39; positions in the network. 
     Even though it is of great importance to deliver the same user experience across the whole cellular network in order to meet the users&#39; expectations, still, a considerable gap is observed between cell-edge and cell-core performance due to inter-cell interference, which poses the main limitation of state-of-the art mobile networks. 
     Long Term Evolution (“LTE”) is the 4th generation cellular mobile system that is being developed and specified in 3GPP as a successor of the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (“UMTS”) standard which was adopted by third generation mobile cellular systems for networks based on the GSM standard. LTE is specified as frequency reuse-1 system designed to achieve maximum gain and efficient use of frequency resources. On one hand, the optimal use of resources provides higher bit rates while on the other hand it generates Inter Cell Interference (ICI) issues associated with the reuse-1 type of deployment. In the absence of any interference mitigation or coordination mechanism, ICI becomes critical in LTE, and as described above, especially on cell borders. Therefore, a number of schemes have been suggested for the mitigation solution of ICI, and are typically classified as static and dynamic on the basis of their type of interference coordination mechanisms. 
     One of these types is centralized ICIC (“cICIC”) which has the advantage of addressing interference issues that distributed ICIC (“dICIC”), which is implemented at the eNodeB level, is incapable of handling. 
     The evolution of the physical layer of the cellular radio access has reached nowadays a level where operation close to theoretical limits of achievable spectral efficiency for a given signal to interference-and-noise (SINR) ratio, becomes feasible. Thus, significant increases in spectral efficiency can be achieved only by improving the SINR through minimization of the interference. 
     The 3GPP LTE Recommendation defines two types of interference minimization techniques. The first one being interference minimization by interference reduction, whereas the second one is interference minimization by inter cell interference coordination (ICIC). The 3GPP standard handles the two types of interference minimization differently. The first type, interference reduction, is used in conjunction with coverage and capacity optimization. The interference reduction is done by implementing RF techniques such as antenna tilt, transmit power reduction, and handover mechanisms. The second type, ICIC, is used exclusively for cell edge user equipment (UE), to which the same Physical Resource Blocks (PRBs) have been assigned by the serving wireless cell as those assigned in other wireless cells to their associated UEs that cause the interference. 
     The LTE Recommendation has defined a new interface between base stations to enable the transfer of ICIC function indicators. This interface is referred to as X2. These function indicators are: Relative Narrowband Transmit Power Indicator (“RNTPI”), High Interference Indicator (“HII”), and Interference Overload Indicator (“OI”). 
     The RNTPI indicator message is sent to neighbor base stations (referred to herein as “eNBs”). It contains one bit per each Physical Resource Block (PRB) in the downlink transmission, which indicates if the transmission power associated with that PRB will be greater than a pre-defined threshold. Thus, neighbor eNBs may anticipate which bands would suffer more severe interference and take the appropriate scheduling decisions immediately, rather than wait to receive and rely on the UEs&#39; Channel Quality Information (“CQI”) reports. 
     The HII indicator for uplink transmissions has a somewhat similar function as that which was described above in connection with the RNTPI message for downlink transmissions. There is one bit per each PRB, enabling the neighboring eNBs to assess whether they should expect high interference power in the near future. Typically, only PRBs that are assigned to cell-edge UEs are indicated by these messages. Reference Signal Received Power (“RSRP”) measurements which are reported as part of handover measurement reports, can identify cell edge UEs. In a similar manner, this indicator can be used to identify the bands used in a frequency partitioning scheme. 
     While the previously described X2 messages are sent out proactively by the eNBs, the overload indicator (“OI”) is only triggered when high-interference in the uplink direction is detected by an eNB. In such a case, an overload indication will be sent to neighbor eNBs whose UEs are potentially the source of this high interference. The message contains a low, medium or high interference level indication per each PRB. However, the question, which cell is the one responsible for the high interference is of course not a trivial question to answer. 
     According to 3GPP TS 36300-970, Inter-cell interference coordination is associated with managing radio resources (notably the radio resource blocks) such that inter-cell interference is kept under control. ICIC is inherently a multi-cell, radio resource management (“RRM”) function that needs to take into account information (e.g. the resource usage status and traffic load situation) obtained from various cells. Furthermore, an ICIC method may be different in the uplink and downlink. 
     3GPP release 10 introduces a new LTE network concept which is defined as heterogeneous networks (“HetNet”), in contrast to previous network releases which deal with homogeneous networks. HetNet is defined as a network of eNBs with different capabilities, most importantly, different Tx-power classes. 
     However, heterogeneous networks pose new ICIC challenges. A first ICIC challenge involves Macro UE that roams about a Home eNB (HeNB) and is not part of the closed subscriber group (“CSG”). In that scenario the Macro eNB UE transmission will become uplink interference to the Home eNB authorized UEs. The second ICIC challenge is Macro eNB transmission to cell edge UEs that forms downlink interference to Pico eNB center cell UE. In order to enable the use of HetNet, enhanced ICIC (eICIC) Rel. 10 requires that all members of a HetNet (Macro, Pico, HeNB) should be capable of interconnecting by using the X2 interface. 
     Another major problem is that the ICIC is limited to data channels. Therefore, the recommendation does not provide sufficient protection for the downlink control channels in the two above-mentioned severe interference scenarios. Furthermore, range expansion has to be limited to small offsets between cells, in order to keep control channel errors at a reasonable level. Hence for Rel. 10 3GPP two new approaches were proposed to avoid heavy inter-cell interference on both data and control channels in the downlink direction. One is based on carrier aggregation with cross-carrier scheduling, while the other is based on time-domain multiplexing (“TDM”) using so called almost blank sub-frames (“ABS”). 
     Carrier Aggregation is one of the most important features of the LTE Advanced. Unlike LTE, it enables an LTE-A UE to connect to several carriers simultaneously. It not only allows resource allocation across carriers, it also allows implementing a scheduler based on fast switching between carriers without time consuming handover. 
     SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE 
     The disclosure may be summarized by referring to the appended claims. 
     It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus to enable reducing interference in a wireless network. 
     It is another object of the present invention to provide a method and an apparatus to enable reducing interference in a wireless network by relying on information that relates to the most interfered groups of allocated radio resources. 
     It is still another object of the present invention to provide a method and an apparatus to enable reducing interference in a wireless network by forcing a change in the definitions of neighboring wireless cells and/or in the definitions of the classifications of user equipment within wireless cells. 
     Other objects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description. 
     According to one embodiment, there is provided a method for reducing inter-cell interferences in a wireless communication network comprising a plurality of wireless cells by invoking Inter-cell interference coordination (“ICIC”) procedure, the method comprises the steps of:
     (a) identifying one or more of the plurality of wireless cells which experience more interference than the remaining of the plurality of wireless cells;   (b) identifying at least one group of allocated radio resources (e.g. Physical Resource Block (PRB)) for transmission to/from the one or more identified wireless cells, and wherein transmissions made while utilizing the at least one identified group of allocated radio resources, are characterized as being subjected to more interference than concurrent transmissions made while utilizing the other groups of allocated radio resources for transmission to/from the one or more identified wireless cells;   (c) for each of the at least one identified group of allocated radio resources, identifying two or more user equipments (UEs) utilizing that group of allocated radio resources, and determining whether the location of at least one of the UEs is at the edge of a wireless cell at which the respective UE is provided with communication services;   (d) selecting one pair of UEs from among the two or more UEs, wherein the current location of one member of that pair of UEs is at an edge of a first wireless cell associated therewith and the current location of the other member of the UEs pairs is either:
       i) located at a second wireless cell which is currently not included in a neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell, or   ii) located at a second wireless cell which is adjacent to the first wireless cell, as long as that other UE member is located away from the second wireless cell&#39;s edge which is located adjacent to an edge of the first wireless cell;   
       

     (d1) for a selected pair of UEs in which the other UE member is located at a second wireless cell currently not included of a neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell (i.e. option (i)), including the second wireless cell in the neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell; 
     (d2) for a selected pair of UEs in which the other UE member is located at a second wireless cell adjacent to the first wireless cell but away from the second wireless cell&#39;s edge which is adjacent to an edge of the first wireless cell (i.e. option (ii)), falsely defining that other member as being a UE located at the second wireless cell&#39;s edge which is adjacent to an edge of the first wireless cell; and 
     (e) invoking an Inter-cell interference coordination procedure involving the selected pair of UEs, thereby reducing inter-cell interferences. 
     As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, step (d1)/(d2) and step (e) may then be repeated for other such selected pairs. 
     In the following description, the wireless communication network is described in terms of a wireless network being in compliance with 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) Recommendation. Nevertheless, it should be understood that the present invention is not restricted to this specific Recommendation (standard) but rather may be implemented in conjunction with any applicable standard, mutatis mutandis. 
     In LTE, both OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access) and SC-FDMA (Single Carrier-Frequency Division Multiple Access) are defined. Both of them utilize 15 KHz subcarriers which are then grouped into Physical Resource Blocks (PRB), each containing 12 subcarriers which amounts to 180 KHz of the spectrum. The present invention relates to a group of allocated radio resources, which, as one of its options, when relating to the LTE Recommendation, is the equivalent of a Physical Resource Block (PRB). Although the following description is provided in terms of PRBs to ease on the reading, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the networks complied with LTE recommendation, nor to the use of PRBs, and encompasses all applicable cases where there is a use of a group of allocated radio resources as meant herein. 
     According to another embodiment, step (a) of the method provided is triggered when the number of successful HARQ events associated with a given wireless cell divided by the sum of HARQ events associated with the given wireless cell (both successful and unsuccessful events) is less than the number of successful HARQ events divided by the sum of HARQ events (both successful and unsuccessful events) for the wireless cells included in a cluster of wireless cells to which the given cell belongs, less a pre-defined factor being a function of the standard deviation of the successful HARQ events divided by the sum of successful and unsuccessful HARQ events associated with the wireless cells belonging to that cluster. 
     In accordance with another embodiment, step (c) comprises retrieving information which relates to Radio Resource Control (RRC) Connection Setup for a plurality of UEs and based on the information retrieved, determining the UEs located at the most interfered wireless cell and the UEs associated with the most interfered PRBs. 
     By yet another embodiment, the step of determining whether the location of the one or more UEs is at the edge of its respective wireless cell, is based upon retrieving time adjustment (TA) and/or received signal strength power (RSSP) values of the UEs whose identities were established, and comparing each of the retrieved TA and RSSP values with predetermined threshold values, so that if the TA value is greater than a first pre-defined threshold value and/or the RSSP value is less than a second pre-defined value, the respective UE is determined to be located at the cell edge. 
     According to still another embodiment, step (d1) comprises utilizing the respective UE&#39;s RRC Connection Setup information in order to identify wireless cells that are not currently included in the neighbors&#39; list of that wireless cell, but which comprise UEs that are associated with the most interfered PRB. 
     Step (d1) may further comprise comparing the TA and/or RSSP values of each UE connected to a wireless cell which is currently not included in the wireless cell&#39;s neighbors&#39; list, to predetermined threshold values and if the respective TA value is greater than a first pre-defined threshold value, and/or the RSSP value is less than a second pre-defined value, determining that this UE is located at the cell edge of a wireless cell that is currently not included in its neighbors&#39; list (e.g. an adjacent non-neighboring wireless cell). 
     By yet another embodiment, step (d1) further comprises identifying from among the UEs determined to be located at an edge of a respective wireless cell which is not currently included in the wireless cell&#39;s neighbors list, which one or more UEs are associated with the most interfered PRB(s). 
     According to another embodiment, step (e) comprises invoking an Inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) procedure between the first and second wireless cells that are defined as being neighboring cells even though that the second wireless cell was not included in the neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell prior to carrying out step (d1). 
     According to still another embodiment, step (e) comprises invoking an Inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) procedure between the first and second wireless cells even though one of the interfering/interfered UEs is currently located at the core of its wireless cell. 
     In accordance with another embodiment, the method provided further comprising a step of monitoring high interference indicator (HII) messages sent from a plurality of wireless cells, wherein each of the HII messages comprises a list of PRBs that are scheduled for a cell edge UEs, and storing the PRBs together with the identities of their associated wireless cell and a timestamp indicating the time at which the HII message was sent. 
     Preferably, in step (d1) one or more wireless cells are identified as not being included in the neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell, and wherein the identification is carried based on information that relates to the stored PRBs, the identities of their associated wireless cells and their respective timestamp. 
     In accordance with another embodiment, if by following step (c) it is determined that the one or more identified most interfered PRBs are not associated with UEs located at a cell edge, determining the identities of the UEs that are connected to the most interfered base station which are associated with the most interfered PRBs. 
     The values of the TA and the received signal strength power (RSSP) of each UE connected to an adjacent neighboring base station, are compared with predetermined threshold values and if the respective TA value is less than the first threshold value and the received signal strength power (RSSP) value is higher than the second value, determining that that UE is located at the cell core of the adjacent neighboring wireless cell thereof. 
     By yet another embodiment, the method further comprising a step of identifying the adjacent neighboring wireless cells that comprise identifications of cell core UEs connected thereto and associated with the one or more of the most interfered PRB(s). 
     In accordance with still another embodiment, the method provided further comprising a step of conveying an HII message to all of the identified adjacent neighboring wireless cells, wherein the most interfered PRB which was found to be associated with a cell core UE, will be falsely identified for the adjacent neighboring wireless cells as being a cell edge PRB, in order to enable invoking an Inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) procedure, thereby reducing inter-cell interferences. 
     In accordance with still another embodiment, the method provided further comprises a step of changing the cell edge to cell core ratio of the wireless cell, wherein the most interfered PRB which was found to be associated with a cell core UE, will now be associated with a cell edge UE and will be categorized as cell edge PRB in order to enable invoking an Inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) procedure, thereby reducing inter-cell interferences. In other words, in the case it is not possible to tag a UE as a cell core and if there exists a base station parameter that defines a ratio between cell edge and cell core, than by changing that parameter one is able to effectively force cell core UEs to be regarded as cell edge UEs without the need to send an artificial HII message. 
     In accordance with still another embodiment, the method provided further comprising a step of changing the tilt of the antenna associated with the wireless cell so that interference energy due to transmissions from/to other wireless cells is minimized. 
     According to another aspect, there is provided a controller adapted to reduce inter-cell interferences in a wireless communication network comprising a plurality of wireless cells, the controller is adapted to carry out the following operations:
     (a) identify one or more of the plurality of wireless cells which experience more interference than the remaining of the plurality of wireless cells;   (b) identify at least one group of allocated radio resources transmitted to/from the one or more identified wireless cells, and wherein transmissions made while utilizing the at least one identified group of allocated radio resources, are characterized as being subjected to more interference than concurrent transmissions made while utilizing the other groups of allocated radio resources for transmission to/from the one or more identified wireless cells;   (c) for each of the at least one identified group of allocated radio resources, identify two or more user equipments (UEs) utilizing that group of allocated radio resources, and determine whether the location of at least one of these UEs is at the edge of a wireless cell at which the respective UE is provided with communication services;   (d) select one pair of UEs from among the two or more UEs, wherein the current location of one member of that pair of UEs is at an edge of a first wireless cell associated therewith and the current location of the other member of the UEs pairs is either:
       i) located at a second wireless cell which is currently not included in a neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell, or   ii) located at a second wireless cell which is adjacent to the first wireless cell, as long as that other UE member is located away from the second wireless cell&#39;s edge which is located adjacent to an edge of the first wireless cell;   
       

     (d1) for a selected pair of UEs in which the other UE member is located at a second wireless cell currently not included of a neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell, include the second wireless cell in the neighbors&#39; list of the first wireless cell; 
     (d2) for a selected pair of UEs in which the other UE member is located at a second wireless cell adjacent to the first wireless cell but away from the second wireless cell&#39;s edge which is adjacent to an edge of the first wireless cell, falsely define that other member as being a UE located at the second wireless cell&#39;s edge which is adjacent to an edge of the first wireless cell; and 
     (e) invoke an Inter-cell interference coordination procedure involving the selected pair of UEs, thereby reducing inter-cell interferences. 
     Other aspects of the present invention such as certain features of the controller and a communication system, which are adapted to operate in accordance with the principles of the method described hereinabove, mutatis mutandis, are encompassed within the scope of the present invention. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein: 
         FIG. 1 —is a schematic illustration of a schematic block diagram of an integrated cICIC controller; 
         FIG. 2 —demonstrates a schematic illustration of a configuration in which a missing neighbor interference type is possible; 
         FIG. 3 —exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out missing neighbor interference mitigation without X2 signaling monitoring; 
         FIG. 4 —exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out missing neighbor interference mitigation with X2 signaling monitoring; 
         FIG. 5 —demonstrates a schematic illustration of a configuration of a wrong PRB mapping interference; 
         FIG. 6 —exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out a wrong PRB mapping interference mitigation without X2 signaling monitoring; and 
         FIG. 7 —exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out a wrong PRB mapping interference mitigation with X2 signaling monitoring. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In this disclosure, the term “comprising” is intended to have an open-ended meaning so that when a first element is stated as comprising a second element, the first element may also include one or more other elements that are not necessarily identified or described herein, or recited in the claims. 
     In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a better understanding of the present invention by way of examples. It should be apparent, however, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. 
     Let us first consider  FIG. 1 , which illustrates a schematic example of a block diagram of an integrated cICIC controller. The centralized ICIC (referred to herein as “cICIC”) controller is connected in this example to the network&#39;s Operation Support System (“OSS”) via an It-FN bus interface, and sends, among many other messages, add/delete neighbor commands or HII messages or new threshold values to the appropriate base station cells via an IP bus. 
     The cICIC controller obtains from the OSS the mapping of all base station cells, their identification codes as well as their IP addresses and their associated neighbors&#39; lists. In addition, the cICIC controller obtains from the OSS the number of hybrid automatic repeat request (“HARQ”) success events and the number of HARQ unsuccessful (failed) events on a per wireless cell basis, i.e. the number of successful and unsuccessful combinations of high-rate forward error-correcting coding and ARQ error-control in each of a plurality of wireless cells (e.g. FDD cells). The number of HARQ events typically depends on the radio environment (higher noise level implies greater number of HARQ events) and on the user throughput requirements (less data entails less HARQ events). In order to eliminate the data throughput dependency, a success rate criteria which is defined as follows, may be used:
 
HARQ Success rate=HARQ success events/(HARQ success events+HARQ fail events)
 
     The cICIC controller maps the deployed base stations into clusters (or alternatively the wireless cells at which the base stations are deployed), wherein each cluster includes at least one base station associated with at least one wireless cell. The cICIC controller than calculates, preferably on ongoing basis, the average HARQ success rate and the standard deviation of the HARQ success rate. If the HARQ success rate associated with a specific wireless cell is found to be less than the cluster&#39;s average HARQ success rate for the wireless cells included in that cluster less a factor which is a function of the standard deviation, an indication is triggered to alert the operator of this situation. 
     A large number of unsuccessful HARQ events (when compared with the number of successful HARQ events) are attributed to excessive interference. The interference may be classified into two types of interferences. The first, interference experienced by cell edge user equipments, UEs, caused by wireless cells which are not part of the neighbors&#39; list, (e.g. by neighbors not included in the neighbors&#39; list, by non-geographically adjacent wireless cells, etc.) in which the same PRBs are used. The second, interference to cell core user equipments caused by neighboring wireless cells which use the same PRBs while communicating with their cell core UEs. 
     For the convenience of the reader, reference will be made hereinafter to the first interference type as “Missing Neighbor interference”, and the second interference type will be referred to as “Wrong PRB Mapping interference”. 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a configuration in which missing neighbor interference type mitigation is possible. In this missing neighbor interference scenario, cell  1 C comprises a UE located at cell edge and to which PRB 1  has been allocated. Cell  3 B, which is not geographically adjacent to cell  1 C and is not included in the neighbors&#39; list of wireless cell  1 C, also comprises a UE at its cell edge using PRB 1 . It is assumed for the sake of this example that the network radio conditions are such, that the UE in cell  1 C does not consider cell  3 B to be a valid cell for receiving radio services therefrom. Similarly the UE in cell  3 B does not consider cell  1 C to be a valid option for receiving services. Due to the fact that cells  1 C and  3 B are not geographical neighbors, the base station ICIC mechanism as known in the prior art is not activated, and consequently the RF transmission by/to the UE in cell  3 B creates interference to the UE of cell  1 C. 
     According to the solution provided herein for overcoming the missing neighbor interference problem, the potential missing neighbors are identified, they are then defined as neighbors of the given cell (even though, as explained above, they are not included in the neighbors&#39; list of the given cell, e.g. not being geographical neighbors thereof), and then the ICIC mechanism of the base station of the given cell is used to coordinate and mitigate the missing neighbor interference. 
     Following are two possible implementations of this solution. The first one (exemplified in  FIG. 3 ) does not involve using X2 signaling monitoring (i.e. X2 signaling over the IP bus) and the second one (exemplified in  FIG. 4 ) involves using X2 signaling monitoring. 
       FIG. 3  exemplifies an embodiment of a method encompassed by the present invention for carrying out missing neighbor interference mitigation without X2 signaling monitoring, which comprises the following steps: 
     Once a HARQ indication is triggered (step  300 ) (i.e. when the HARQ success rate associated with a given wireless cell is less than the average HARQ success rate for the wireless cells included in that cluster to which the given cell belongs, less a factor which is a function of the standard deviation), the cICIC controller identifies (step  305 ) the one (or more) most interfered wireless cell(s) (e.g. the eNB cell subjected to the larger interferences), the cluster with which it is associated, and the timestamp of the respective HARQ success rate. 
     The cICIC controller then identifies the PRB noise measurements for each most interfered base station (i.e. the base station (e.g. eNB) of the most interfered wireless cells) (step  310 ), and from data received along its It-FN bus, the cICIC controller is able to determine (step  315 ) one (or more) most interfered PRB associated with the most interfered base station(s) (i.e. PRB for sending/receiving communications by the most interfered base station(s)). 
     The available Radio Resource Control (RRC) Connection Setup information is examined (e.g. by the cICIC controller based on information received along its It-FN bus) in order to determine which are the UEs that are in communication with the most interfered base station, and which UEs are associated with the most interfered PRBs (step  320 ). 
     Next, it is determined whether the most interfered PRB is associated with a cell edge UE (step  325 ), and based on the available RRC Connection Setup information (e.g. retrieved along the cICIC controller It-FN bus), the identities of the UEs that are connected to the most interfered wireless cell which are also associated with the most interfered PRB(s), are established (step  330 ). 
     The time adjustment (TA) value and the received signal strength power (RSSP) (e.g. retrieved from the It-FN bus) of the UEs whose identities were established in step  330 , provide an indication for the estimated distance extending between the UE and its serving base station (step  335 ). The TA and RSSP values are compared with predetermined threshold values and if the respective TA value is larger than a first threshold value and the received signal strength power (RSSP) value is less than the second value, the respective UE is determined to be located at a cell edge (step  340 ). 
     The cICIC controller maintains a list of base stations that are located at the vicinity of every base station (but not included in its list of neighboring base stations), and a list of neighbors for every base station. The cICIC controller examines the UEs&#39; RRC Connection Setup information in order to identify adjacent, yet non-neighboring wireless cells comprising UEs that are associated with the most interfered PRB(s) (step  345 ). 
     Then, the cICIC controller determines whether a most interfered PRB is associated with a cell edge UE connected to an adjacent, non-neighboring base station (step  350 ), by comparing the TA and RSSP values of each UE connected to an adjacent, non-neighboring base station to predetermined threshold values and if the TA value is found to be higher than the first threshold value and/or the RSSP value is found to be less than the second threshold value, the cICIC controller concludes that the UE of the non-neighboring wireless cell is located at a cell edge. 
     Thereafter, the cICIC controller compiles a list of adjacent but non-neighboring base stations, which serve the cell edge UEs that are associated with the most interfered PRB(s) (step  355 ). 
     Then cICIC controller sends an “add neighbor” command to all of the base stations in the above compiled list (preferably over the IP bus), and following the receipt of this command, the respective base stations that are included in that list, change the status of the most interfered base station (step  360 ) to a new status, by defining that most interfered base station to be their neighbor. In other words, the cICIC controller initiates a forced neighboring relationship between base stations of wireless cells that are not part of the neighbors&#39; list of the most interfered wireless cell, e.g. they are not geographical neighbors to the most interfered wireless cell, and the base station of the most interfered wireless cell. 
     Following a predetermined timeout, the cICIC controller reexamines the new value of the HARQ success rate of the most interfered base station in order to determine whether the above procedure has been successful (step  365 ) (e.g. is the wireless cell that was previously identified as having the most interfered base station, has no longer the most interfered base station). If the above procedure is not found to be successful, the process is reversed by issuing a “delete neighbor” command, thereby removing all the adjacent, non-neighboring base stations from the neighbors&#39; list of the base station that was the most interfered base station (step  370 ), and of the respective base stations that were defined by the cICIC controller as its neighbors. Steps  305  to  370  are repeated, triggering a new HARQ indication in accordance with step  300 . 
       FIG. 4  exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out a missing neighbor interference mitigation with X2 signaling monitoring. According to this embodiment, the cICIC controller monitors the base stations&#39; HII messages sent over the IP bus (step  400 ), where each HII message comprises a list of PRBs that are scheduled to be associated with cell edge UEs. The PRBs are stored and a record thereof is maintained together with its respective base station (or alternatively its respective wireless cell) identity and a timestamp indicating the time at which the HIT message was sent. 
     Once a HARQ indication is triggered as discussed in the previous example (step  300 ), the cICIC controller identifies the most interfered wireless cell (or alternatively the most interfered base station), the cluster it is associated with, and the timestamp of the respective HARQ events. 
     The cICIC controller then identifies the PRB noise measurements for each of the most interfered base stations (step  405 ), and from data received along its It-FN bus, it is able to determine the one (or more) most interfered PRB associated with the most interfered base station(s) (step  410 ). 
     The cICIC controller maintains a list of the base stations located at the vicinity of every base station (but not being its geographical neighbor) as well as a list of the adjacent neighbors, for every base station. It then examines the stored records in order to compile a list of the base stations which are the most probable candidates to cause interference based on time proximity between the recorded timestamps of their associated PRBs and the timestamp of the most interfered PRB (step  415 ). The cICIC controller then compiles a list of adjacent, non-neighboring base stations (step  420 ) that are associated with the most interfered PRB. 
     Thereafter, The cICIC controller sends an “add neighbor” command to all base stations included in the above compiled list (preferably over the IP bus) (step  425 ), and in response to that command, the definition of all these base stations is forcedly changed to become the neighbors of the most interfered base station, and vice versa (step  430 ). 
     Following a predetermined timeout, the cICIC controller reexamines the value of the HARQ success rate of the most interfered base station in order to determine whether the above procedure has been successful (step  435 ) (e.g. is the base station that was identified as the most interfered base station, no longer the most interfered base station), and if not, (step  440 ) the process is reversed by issuing a “delete neighbor” command, thereby removing all the adjacent, non-neighboring base stations from the neighbors&#39; list of the base station that was the most interfered one, and vice versa. Upon receiving a new HARQ indication, repeating steps  405  to  440 ). 
       FIG. 5  illustrates a configuration of a wrong PRB mapping, in which cell  1 C comprises a UE located at cell center to which PRB 1  has been allocated, and Cell  2 A, which is geographically adjacent to cell  1 C (a neighbor of C 1 ), also comprises a UE at its cell edge using PRB 1 . Due to the fact that cells  10  and  2 A are neighbors of each other and the respective UEs are at cell center, the ICIC mechanism is not activated and the RF transmission by the UE in cell  2 A creates UL interference at cell  1 C (and vise versa). 
     According to the solution provided herein for overcoming the wrong PRB mapping interference problem, the potentially interfering cell core PRBs are identified, they are then defined as cell edge PRBs, and then the ICIC mechanism of the base station of the given cell is used to coordinate and mitigate the wrong PRB mapping interference. 
     Following are two possible implementations of the present solution to overcome this problem. The first one does not involve using X2 signaling monitoring (i.e. X2 signaling over the IP bus) while the second one involves using X2 signaling monitoring. 
       FIG. 6  exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out a wrong PRB mapping interference mitigation without X2 signaling monitoring. The method according to this embodiment comprises the following steps: 
     Once a HARQ indication is triggered as discussed above (step  300 ), the cICIC controller identifies (step  600 ) the most interfered wireless cell (or rather the base station associated therewith), the cluster it is associated with, and the timestamp of the respective HARQ success rate. 
     The cICIC controller uses the PRB noise measurements of the base station in the most interfered wireless cell (e.g. data received along its It-FN bus), to determine the most interfered PRB associated with the most interfered wireless cell (step  605 ). 
     The cICIC controller examines (step  610 ) the available Radio Resource Control (RRC) Connection Setup information (e.g. information received along its It-FN bus) in order to determine which are the UEs that are associated (e.g. connected) with the most interfered wireless cell, and which UEs are associated with the most interfered PRBs. 
     Next, it determines whether the most interfered PRB is associated with a cell core UE (step  615 ), and based on the available RRC Connection Setup information (e.g. retrieved via the cICIC controller&#39;s It-FN bus), establishes the identities of the UEs that are connected to the most interfered base station and which are associated with the most interfered PRB(s) (step  620 ). 
     The time adjustment (TA) and the received signal strength power (RSSP) values (e.g. retrieved from the It-FN bus) of the UEs whose identities were established, are then applied in order to enable estimating the distance extending between the UE and its respective serving base station. The TA and RSSP values are compared with predetermined threshold values, and if the TA value is found to be less than a first threshold value and/or the RSSP value is found to be over a second threshold value, the respective UE is determined to be located at a cell core (step  625 ). 
     The cICIC controller maintains a list of base stations that are located at the vicinity (but not a neighbor) of every base station and a list of the associated neighbors, for every base station. It then examines the UEs&#39; RRC Connection Setup information in order to identify adjacent neighboring wireless cells comprising UEs that are associated with the most interfered PRB (step  630 ). 
     Then, the cICIC controller determines whether the most interfered PRB is associated with a cell core UE connected to a base station located in an adjacent neighboring wireless cell (step  635 ). The cICIC controller compares the TA and RSSP values of each UE connected to an adjacent neighboring base station, with predetermined threshold values and if the TA value is found to be less than that first threshold value and/or the RSSP value is found to be higher than the second threshold value, the cICIC controller concludes that this UE is located at a cell core of the neighboring wireless cell. 
     Thereafter, the cICIC controller compiles a list of adjacent neighboring base stations that comprises identifications of cell core UEs connected to these base stations which are associated with the most interfered PRB(s) (step  640 ), and sends (step  645 ) an X2 HII message to all the base stations included in the list compiled in step  640  (preferably over the IP bus), in which the most interfered PRB, even though it was found to be associated with a cell core UE, would be falsely identified for the base stations as being a cell edge PRB, in order to enable invoking the ICIC mechanism (step  645 ). 
     Following a predetermined timeout, the cICIC controller reexamines the value of the HARQ success rate of the most interfered base station in order to determine whether the above procedure has been successful (step  650 ) (e.g. is the wireless cell that was identified as the most interfered wireless cell, no longer the most interfered wireless cell). If the most interfered wireless cell is still found to be the most interfered eNB cell, an error message will be issued (step  655 ). Steps  600  to  655  are repeated when a new HARQ indication is triggered. 
       FIG. 7  exemplifies an embodiment of a method for carrying out a wrong PRB mapping interference mitigation with X2 signaling monitoring, which comprises the following steps. 
     The cICIC controller monitors eNB cell HII messages sent over the IP bus (step  700 ). Each HII message comprises a list of PRBs that are scheduled to be assigned to cell core UEs. The PRBs are stored and a record thereof is maintained (step  705 ) together with the eNB cell identity and a timestamp indicating the time at which the HII message was sent. 
     Once a HARQ indication is triggered as discussed above (see step  300  of  FIG. 3 ), the cICIC controller identifies the most interfered eNB cell, the cluster it is associated with, and the timestamp of the respective HARQ events (step  710 ). 
     The cICIC controller then identifies the PRB noise measurements for each of the most interfered eNB cells from data received along its It-FN bus (step  715 ), and determines (step  720 ) the one (or more) most interfered PRB associated with the most interfered eNB cell(s). 
     The cICIC controller maintains a list of the eNB cells that are at the vicinity of every eNB cell, and a list of the associated neighbors for every eNB cell. It examines the stored records in order to compile a list of the eNB cells which are the most probable candidates to cause interference, based on the proximity between the recorded timestamps of their associated PRB that do not comprise the most interfered PRB (step  725 ). The underlying assumption here is that if the most interfered PRB is not associated with cell edge UEs, it is most probably associated with cell core UEs. The cICIC controller compiles a list of neighbor eNB cells that most probably have assigned the most interfered PRB to cell core UEs (step  730 ) and compiles a list of neighboring eNB cells that are most likely associated with the most interfered PRB to cell core UEs (step  735 ). 
     The cICIC controller sends (step  740 ) an X2 HII message to all of the eNB cells in the above compiled list (preferably over the IP bus), in which the most interfered PRB even though it is associated with a cell core UE, would be falsely identified for the eNB cells as being a cell edge PRB, in order to enable invoking the ICIC mechanism (step  745 ). 
     Following a predetermined timeout, the cICIC controller reexamines the value of the HARQ success rate of the most interfered eNB cell in order to determine whether the above procedure has been successfully conducted (step  747 ) (e.g. is the eNB cell that was identified as the most interfered eNB cell, is no longer the most interfered eNB cell), but if the most interfered eNB cell still remains the most interfered eNB cell, an error message will be issued (step  750 ). Steps  700  to  750  are repeated every time a new HARQ indication is triggered. 
     The present invention has been described using detailed descriptions of embodiments thereof that are provided by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. The described embodiments comprise different features, not all of which are required in all embodiments of the invention. Some embodiments of the present invention utilize only some of the features or possible combinations of the features. Variations of embodiments of the present invention that are described and embodiments of the present invention comprising different combinations of features noted in the described embodiments will occur to persons of the art. For example, determining which wireless cell is the most interfered cell can be done on a PRB basis or on any other applicable time basis which will is applicable to the various wireless cells. The scope of the invention is limited only by the following claims.