Abstract:
Technologies, systems, and methods for ordered message delivery that avoid message races or crisscrosses between communicating nodes. For example, if Node A sends message 3 towards Node B and, shortly thereafter, Node B sends message X to Node A, Node A would like to know whether or not message X reflects Node B&#39;s state after receiving message 3. If Node B received message 3 prior to sending message X, then proper state may be maintained between the nodes. But if messages 3 and X crisscrossed, or if message 3 was never properly received by Node B, then the state between the nodes may be corrupt. Technologies, systems, and methods are provided to avoid such corruption.

Description:
RELATED APPLICATIONS 
       [0001]    This Application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/684,156 that was filed on Nov. 22, 2012, and that is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/824,092 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,327,030) that was filed on Jun. 25, 2010 (Issued Dec. 4, 2012) and that is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/858,140 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,774,490) that was filed on Sep. 20, 2007 (Issued Aug. 10, 2010) each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND 
       [0002]    Distributed systems, such as networked computers, may need to know each other&#39;s state during communications. This typically requires that two systems communicate sequentially rather than simultaneously. If both systems send messages to each other simultaneously (or non-sequentiaily) resulting in crisscrossed messages, a race condition can develop which can lead to divergent and corrupted state information. 
       SUMMARY 
       [0003]    The following presents a simplified summary of the disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding to the reader. This summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure and it does not identify key/critical elements of the invention or delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts disclosed herein in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later. 
         [0004]    The present examples provide technologies for ordered message delivery that avoid message races or crisscrosses between communicating nodes. For example, if Node A sends message 3 towards Node B and, shortly thereafter, Node B sends message X to Node A, Node A would like to know whether or not message X reflects Node B&#39;s state after receiving message 3. If Node B received message 3 prior to sending message X, then proper state may be maintained between the nodes. But if messages 3 and X crisscrossed, or if message 3 was never properly received by Node B, then the state between the nodes may be corrupt. Technologies, systems, and methods are provided to avoid such corruption. 
         [0005]    Many of the attendant features will be more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings. 
     
    
     
       DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0006]    The present description will be better understood from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein: 
           [0007]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram showing two example crisscross cancellation protocol-enabled nodes that are communicatively coupled. 
           [0008]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram showing an example crisscross cancelation protocol (“C3P”) message including an example C3P header. 
           [0009]      FIG. 3  is a block diagram showing an example crisscross cancellation protocol state diagram. 
           [0010]      FIG. 4  is a block diagram showing an example method for initializing a crisscross cancellation protocol instance and for sending a message. 
           [0011]      FIG. 5  is a block diagram showing an example method for processing a crisscross cancellation protocol message and detecting a message crisscross. 
           [0012]      FIG. 6  is a timing diagram showing an example of ordered message transmissions between two example nodes. 
           [0013]      FIG. 7  is a block diagram showing an example method for processing a crisscross cancellation protocol message while in a race fix state. 
           [0014]      FIG. 8  is a timing diagram, an extension of the timing diagram of  FIG. 6 , showing an example of a message crisscross and a subsequent recovery. 
           [0015]      FIG. 9  is a block diagram showing an example computing environment in which the technologies described herein may be implemented. 
       
    
    
       [0016]    Like reference numerals are used to designate like parts in the accompanying drawings. 
       DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0017]    The detailed description provided below in connection with the accompanying drawings is intended as a description of the present examples and is not intended to represent the only forms in which the present examples may be constructed or utilized. The description sets forth at least some of the functions of the examples and/or the sequence of steps for constructing and operating examples. However, the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different examples. 
         [0018]    Although the present examples are described and illustrated herein as being implemented in a computing and networking environment, the environment described is provided as an example and not a limitation. As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the present examples are suitable for application in a variety of different types of computing and networking environments. 
         [0019]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram showing two example crisscross cancellation protocol-enabled nodes that are communicatively coupled. Node A and Node B are coupled as indicated by line  190 , which may be any type of coupling, connection, communications link, network, or the like. Each node includes an example application, such as applications  110   a  and  110   b , which may be any program, system, device, software, device driver, firmware, or the like that may benefit from a crisscross cancellation protocol. Applications  110   a  and  110   b  may or may not be the same. Applications  110   a  and  110   b  typically send and receive messages via a crisscross cancellation protocol (“C3P”) layer, such as C3Ps  120   a  and  120   b . The crisscross cancellation protocol maintains appropriate state information via state variables such as variables  121   a - 124   a . A crisscross cancellation protocol typically makes use of a transport, such as transports  130   a  and  130   b , to send and receive C3P messages over some form of communications link. 
         [0020]    The state fields or variables typically maintain the state of the C3P. Each C3P module or instance of the C3P includes: a counter, such as counter state variables  121   a  and  121   b ; a nonce, such as nonce state variables  122   a  and  122   b;  a remote counter, such as remote counter state variables  123   a  and  123   b;  and a remote nonce, such as remote nonce state variables  124   a  and  124   b . In one example, each of these state variables is a 64-bit number. 
         [0021]    The nonce state variable (i.e.,  122   a ) typically uniquely identifies the current C3P session. A C3P session is typically established when a C3P layer is initialized. A new instance of the C3P layer is typically established each time a C3P-enabled node needs to communicate with a new C3P-enabled node (for example, one that it has not previously communicated with). Generally, each time a C3P layer is initialized a new nonce is generated. 
         [0022]    The remote nonce state variable (i.e.,  124   a ) is typically used to record the nonce of a remote node (that is, the remote node&#39;s C3P layer) as indicated by the header of the last valid C3P message received from the remote node. 
         [0023]    The term “nonce” as used herein refers to a cryptographic random nonce, a counter or random or pseudo-random number that is unlikely to be reused. Such a nonce is generally used by C3P to identify each session uniquely from any other session. Thus, in the event of a node crash or the like, the next time the C3P is initialized a new and unique nonce is established indicating a new and unique C3P session. 
         [0024]    The counter state variable (i.e.,  121   a ) is typically a monotonicaMy increasing variable that increments by one for each message sent, or a value identifying the last message sent. In one example, the counter is incremented each time a message is sent. 
         [0025]    The remote counter state variable (i.e.,  123   a ) is typically used to record the counter of a remote node (that is, the remote node&#39;s C3P layer) as indicated by the header of the last valid C3P message received from the remote node. 
         [0026]    In general, an application passes a message to be sent to another node down to the C3P layer, the C3P layer typically adds a C3P header (as described in connection with  FIG. 1 ), buffers the message in a send buffer, and passes the message to the transport which sends the message over the network to the target node. Each C3P layer typically buffers a single outgoing message in a send buffer. 
         [0027]    Upon receiving a valid C3P message, the message is stored in a C3P receive buffer after the target node&#39;s transport passes the C3P message up to the C3P layer. In one example, the receive buffer stores one or more incoming messages. The C3P layer verifies the messages are valid, removes the C3P header, and passes the message up to a corresponding application. In one example, once the application is done processing the received message, it instructs the C3P layer to empty this message from the receive buffer. In this example, the C3P layer will not send a message until the receive buffer is empty, as doing so would be equivalent to a message crisscross, with the application sending a new message without having processed a previously received message. 
         [0028]    The two communicating C3P layers intemperate to provide ordered message delivery for the applications and to avoid message races or crisscrosses. The term “message race” or “message crisscross” or “crisscross” as used herein refers to the situation when a first node sends a message to a second node and, before the second node receives the message from the first node, the second node sends a message to the first, node. Such a situation results in a message crisscross or message race condition. This situation is described in more detail in connection with  FIG. 8 . 
         [0029]    As used herein, the term “node” refers to any computer system, device, or process that is uniquely addressable, or otherwise uniquely identifiable, over a network or the like, and that is operable to communicate with other nodes over the network. For example, and without limitation, a node may be a personal computer, a server computer, a hand-held or laptop device, a tablet device, a multiprocessor system, a microprocessor-based system, a set top box, a consumer electronic device, a network PC, a minicomputer, a mainframe computer, a uniquely-identifiable software application, or the like. One example of a node such as Node A and Node B, in the form of computer system  900 , is set forth herein below with respect to  FIG. 9 . 
         [0030]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram showing an example crisscross cancelation protocol (“C3P”) message  200  including an example C3P header  210 . The C3P message  200  is typically comprised of an application message (a message, packet, data, or the like provided by an application) in the message field  220  and a C3P header  210 . In one example, C3P header  210  includes state information in four fields: nonce  211 , remote nonce  212 , counter  213 , and remote counter  214 . In this example, the state values are 64-bit numbers. Nonce  211  and counter  213  values are typically taken from the sending C3P&#39;s corresponding state variables each time a message is sent. Remote nonce  212  and remote counter  214  values are typically taken from the sending C3P&#39;s remote nonce and remote counter state variables, the values of which are typically obtained from the header of the last valid C3P message received from the remote node. A C3P ping message is a version of C3P message  200  that does not include application message  220 . 
         [0031]      FIG. 3  is a block diagram showing an example crisscross cancellation protocol state diagram  300 . A particular C3P instance generally transitions between two states: C3P normal state  310  and C3P race fix state  320 . Once the C3P instance is successfully initialized, it typically enters C3P normal state  310 . Each time a normal (non-C3P ping) C3P message is sent, the C3P transitions back into the C3P normal state as indicated by arrow  330 . The C3P remains in the C3P normal state  330  until a C3P message crisscross is detected. If a C3P message crisscross is detected (as described in connection with  FIG. 5 ), the C3P transitions into the C3P race fix state  320  as indicated by arrow  340 . The C3P remains in the C3P race fix state  320  until a C3P message is received that is not a message crisscross. Each time any C3P message is received that has crisscrossed with another message, the C3P transitions back into the C3P race fix state  320  as indicated by arrow  350 . When an in-order C3P message (either a C3P ping or a C3P message that does include an application message) is received or other appropriate conditions are met as described in connection with  FIG. 7 , the C3P transitions into the C3P normal state  310  as indicated by arrow  360 . 
         [0032]      FIG. 4  is a block diagram showing an example method  400  for initializing a crisscross cancellation protocol instance and for sending a message. C3P initialization includes the steps indicated by blocks  410  and  420 . Each time a hosting node starts a C3P instance the initialization steps are performed. This generally includes each time the node starts a new C3P instance to communicate with a particular new remote node, and each time the node restarts during a C3P session, such as a reboot or a crash restart. 
         [0033]    Block  410  indicates initializing the C3P&#39;s nonce state variable, as described in connection with  FIG. 1 . This is typically done by generating a new nonce value, in one example, a nonce is generated as a random number which is typically different than a previous nonce. Once the nonce state variable is initialized, method  400  typically continues at block  420 . 
         [0034]    Block  420  indicates initializing the C3P&#39;s counter state variable, as described in connection with  FIG. 1 . This is typically done by generating a new counter value. In one example, the counter is initialized to zero (0). Once the counter state variable is initialized, C3P initialization is typically complete and method  400  typically continues at block  430 . 
         [0035]    Block  430  typically indicates waiting for an application message to send. Once the C3P is initialized, it waits for a message to be sent. Messages are typically provided by an application or the like. Once a message is available to be sent, method  400  typically continues at block  440 . 
         [0036]    Block  440  typically indicates incrementing the counter state variable, as described in connection with  FIG. 1 . The counter state variable may be incremented by one or more. Once the counter state variable has been incremented, method  400  typically continues at block  450 . 
         [0037]    Block  450  typically indicates formatting and sending a C3P message. Formatting is typically performed by adding a C3P header to the message provided by the application (see description for block  430 ). The C3P header and message are typically constructed as described in connection with  FIG. 2 . In one example, the C3P message is sent by providing it to a transport as described in connection with  FIG. 1 . Once the message is sent, method  400  typically continues at block  430 . 
         [0038]      FIG. 5  is a block diagram showing an example method  500  for processing a crisscross cancellation protocol message and detecting a message crisscross. Method  500  is typically performed by a C3P instance receiving a C3P message while in the C3P normal state as described in connection with  FIG. 3 . In general, method  500  compares state information in the incoming message&#39;s header with state information stored in the C3P instance receiving the message, as described in connection with  FIG. 1 . 
         [0039]    Block  510  typically indicates receiving a C3P message. Such a message typically includes a C3P header including state information as described in connection with  FIG. 2 . Once a message is received, method  500  typically continues at block  520 . 
         [0040]    Block  520  typically indicates determining if the nonce value of the incoming message&#39;s header is correct, in one example, the value in the nonce field of the incoming message&#39;s header (i.e., item  211 ,  FIG. 2 ) is compared with the value stored in the remote nonce field of the receiving C3P instance&#39;s state information (i.e., item  124   a ,  FIG. 1 ). If the two values do not match (e.g., are not equal), then the receiving C3P instance assumes that the sending C3P instance has crashed since the last message received. If the two values do not match, method  500  typically continues at block  530 . Otherwise, method  500  typically continues at block  550 . 
         [0041]    Block  530  typically indicates invalidating the receiving C3P instance&#39;s state information. In one example this is done by setting each of the remote state values (i.e., items  123   a - 124   a ,  FIG. 1 ) to zero (0). Once the state information has been invalidated, the application is typically made aware that the remote C3P instance has experienced a crash, and then method  500  typically continues at block  540 . 
         [0042]    Block  540  typically indicates setting the receiving C3P instance&#39;s remote nonce field (i.e., item  124   a ,  FIG. 1 ) to the value in the nonce field of the incoming message (i.e., item  211 ,  FIG. 2 ). Once the remote nonce state value is set, method  500  continues at block  550 . 
         [0043]    Block  550  typically indicates determining if the counter value of the incoming message&#39;s header is correct. In one example, the value in the counter field of the incoming message&#39;s header (i.e., item  213 ,  FIG. 2 ) is strictly greater than the value stored in the remote counter field of the receiving C3P instance&#39;s state information (i.e., item  123   a ,  FIG. 1 ). If the incoming counter is not greater, then the receiving C3P instance assumes that it has already received the incoming message or a later message. If the incoming counter is not greater, then method  500  typically continues at, block  552 . Otherwise, method  500  typically continues at block  560 . 
         [0044]    Block  552  typically indicates dropping the incoming message because it was either already received or because a later message was already received (see block  550 ). Once the incoming message is dropped, method  500  typically continues at block  510 . 
         [0045]    Block  560  typically indicates setting the receiving C3P instance&#39;s remote counter field (i.e., item  123   a ,  FIG. 1 ) to the value in the counter field of the incoming message (i.e., item  213 ,  FIG. 2 ). Once the remote counter state value is set, method  500  continues at block  570 . 
         [0046]    Block  570  typically indicates determining if the remote counter value and remote nonce value of the incoming message&#39;s header are correct. In one example, the value in the remote counter field of the incoming message&#39;s header (i.e., item  214 ,  FIG. 2 ) matches (e.g., is equal to) the value stored in the counter field of the receiving C3P instance&#39;s state information (i.e., item  121   a ,  FIG. 1 ) and the value in the remote nonce field of the incoming message&#39;s header (i.e., item  212 ,  FIG. 2 ) is either zero or matches (e.g., is equal to) the value stored in the nonce field of the receiving C3P instance&#39;s state information (i.e., item  122   a ,  FIG. 1 ). If the incoming remote counter does not match, or if the incoming remote nonce is neither zero nor matching, then the receiving C3P instance assumes that one or more messages have crisscrossed. If the incoming remote counter is not matching, or if the incoming remote nonce is neither zero nor matching, then method  500  typically continues at block  572 . Otherwise, method  500  typically continues at block  580 . 
         [0047]    Block  572  typically indicates the receiving C3P instance entering the C3P race fix state as described in connection with  FIG. 3 . Entering the C3P race fix state typically includes dropping the incoming message. Processing while in the C3P race fix state proceeds as described in connection with  FIG. 7 . 
         [0048]    Block  580  typically describes passing the incoming message up to a receiving application. At this point the incoming message is determined to be valid, in one example, the C3P header is stripped from the message before it is passed up. Once the message is passed, method  500  typically continues at block  510 . 
         [0049]      FIG. 6  is a timing diagram  600  showing an example of ordered message transmissions between two example nodes. Arrow  610  is a timeline for Node A and arrow  611  is a corresponding timeline for Node B. State block  612  shows the example initial state of Node A and state block  613  shows the example initial state of Node B at the beginning of the timelines. State blocks  612 ,  613 , and the like, and their included fields, correspond to those described in connection with  FIG. 1 . In particular, field  612   a  corresponds to field  121   a  of  FIG. 1 ; field  612   b  corresponds to field  123   a  of  FIG. 1 ; field  6112   c  corresponds to field  122   a  of  FIG. 1 ; and field  612   d  corresponds to field  124   a  of  FIG. 1 . The values for the various state fields are examples only and may be any appropriate values in practice. Each node is typically initialized to the C3P normal state as described in connection with  FIG. 3  and typically operates according to method  500  described in connection with  FIG. 5 . In one example, the state fields support 64-bit values and may be initialized as shown in Table A and Table B herein below: 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE A 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Node A Initial State: 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Nonce 
                 0 × 1234567812345678 
               
               
                   
                 Counter 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 Remote Nonce  
                 0 × 0 
               
               
                   
                 Remote Counter 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE B 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Node B initial State: 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Nonce 
                 0 × 8765432187654321 
               
               
                   
                 Counter 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 Remote Nonce 
                 0 × 0 
               
               
                   
                 Remote Counter  
                 0 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0050]    As shown in tables A and B, examples of the initial states of Nodes A and B, each node knows its own nonce, but not the other node&#39;s nonce (as indicated by the initial value of zero shown in hexadecimal (0×0) in the Remote Nonce fields). Further, in their initial states, each node knows its own counter (which may be initialized to zero as shown), but not the other node&#39;s counter (as indicated by the initial value of zero (0) in the remote counter fields). Nonce fields may be initialized with random values. In other examples, initial values other than zero may be used and/or initial values of the other node may be known. 
         [0051]    Timing diagram  600  shows Node B sending a first message to Node A, as indicated by arrow and message header  620 . The message header includes the nonce value of Node B (N=98), the nonce of node A (RN=0, currently unknown by Node B), the incremented counter value of Node B (C=11, incremented from C=10 of state  613  prior to sending message  620 ), and the counter value of Node A (RC=0, currently unknown by Node B). State block  615  indicates the state of Node B after sending message  620 . 
         [0052]    Upon receiving message  620 , Node A updates its state with the information from the header of message  620 , as indicated by state block  614 . At this point, Node A knows the nonce of Node B (RN=98) and the message counter of Node B (RC=11), and state  614  is updated to indicate such. Node A may know message  620  is a first message from Node B because Node A&#39;s state information for Node B (remote nonce and remote counter) was set to the initial state (zero) when message  620  was received. 
         [0053]    Per timing diagram  600 , Node A now sends a message to Node B, as indicated by arrow and message header  630 . The message header includes the nonce value of Node A (N=12), the incremented counter value of Node A (C−1, incremented from C=0 of state  612  prior to sending message  630 ), the nonce value of node B (RN=98, known by Node A via message  620 ), and the counter value of Node B (R=11, known by Node A via message  620 ). State block  616  indicates the state of Node A after sending message  630 . 
         [0054]    Upon receiving message  630 , Node B updates its state with the information from the header of message  630 , as indicated by state block  617 . At this point, Node B knows the nonce of Node A (RN=12) and the message counter of Node A (RC=1), and state  617  is updated to indicate such. Node B may know message  630  is a first message from Node A because Node B&#39;s state information for Node A (remote nonce and remote counter) was set to the initial state (zero) when message  630  was received. 
         [0055]    Per timing diagram  600 , Node B now sends a second message to Node A, as indicated by arrow and message header  640 . The message header includes the nonce value of Node B (N=98), the incremented counter value of Node B (C=12, incremented from C=11 of state  617  prior to sending message  640 ), the nonce value of Node A (RN=12, known by Node B via message  630 ) and the counter value of Node A (RC−1, known by Node B via message  630 ). State block  619  indicates the state of Node B after sending message  640 . 
         [0056]    Upon receiving message  640 , Node A determines that its state values for Node B (remote nonce and remote counter) are not set to the initial values. Therefore, Node A verifies that the nonce value in the message header  640  from Node B (N=98) matches that of its state  616  for Node B (RN=98). If there is a match, then Node A knows that the C3P session of Node B has not reset since the last message received from Node B. Node A further verifies that the counter value in message header  640  from Node B (C=12) is greater than that of its state  616  for Node B (RC=11). If the counter of the incoming message is greater than that of Node A&#39;s state for Node B, then Node A knows that message  640 , or a later message, has not already been received. Node A further verifies that the remote counter value in message header  640  from Node B (RC=1) matches that of its state  616  for Node A&#39;s counter (C=1). If there is a match, then Node A knows that Node B did not send message  640  prior to receiving message  630  from Node A-that is, there was no message crisscross. If the nonce and counter of message  640  are valid and there was no message crisscross, then Node A updates its state with the information from the header of message  640 , as indicated by state block  618 . Other ordered messages may be sent between Nodes A and B in like manner. 
         [0057]      FIG. 7  is a block diagram showing an example method  700  for processing a crisscross cancellation protocol message while in a race fix state. Method  700  is typically performed by a C3P instance receiving a C3P message while in the C3P race fix state as described in connection with  FIG. 3 . In general, method  700  compares state information in the incoming message&#39;s header with state information stored in the C3P instance receiving the message, as described in connection with  FIG. 1 . 
         [0058]    Block  710  typically indicates the C3P instance receiving an incoming C3P message. Such an incoming message may be a C3P message, as described in connection with  FIG. 2 , or a C3P ping message, as described in connection with FIGS.  2  and  8 . When such a message arrives, it is typically buffered in a single-message receive buffer. When a message arrives, method  700  typically continues at block  740 . Until a message arrives, method  700  typically continues at block  720 . 
         [0059]    Block  720  typically indicates determining if it is time to send a C3P ping message, in one example, ping messages are sent, while in the C3P race fix state at intervals based on a back-off algorithm, such as starting with an interval of 50 milliseconds and doubling the interval with each ping that does not result in a return to the C3P normal state. When it is time to send a ping message, method  700  typically continues at block  730 . Otherwise, method  700  typically continues at block  710  waiting for an incoming message. 
         [0060]    Block  730  typically indicates sending a C3P ping message. This typically involves constructing the message header based on current state information as described in connection with  FIG. 2 . Once the ping message has been sent, method  700  typically continues with block  710 . 
         [0061]    Block  740  typically indicates validating the incoming message, in one example, this is done by checking the message header values against the state variable of the C3P instance as described in connection with blocks  520  through  570  of  FIG. 5 . If any of the incoming message&#39;s header values are incorrect, method  700  typically continues at block  742 . Otherwise, method  700  typically continues at block  744 . 
         [0062]    Block  742  typically indicates dropping the incoming message. Once the incoming message is dropped, method  700  typically continues at block  710 . 
         [0063]    Block  744  typically indicates updating the C3P instance&#39;s state variables based on the incoming message&#39;s header values. In one example, this is done by checking the message header values against the state variable of the C3P instance as described in connection with blocks  520  through  570  of  FIG. 5 . Once the state variables are updated, method  700  typically continues at block  750 . 
         [0064]    Block  750  typically indicates determining if a buffered message is present in the send buffer and an incoming message is a ping message, if a buffered message is present in the send buffer and the incoming message is a ping message, method  700  typically continues at block  760 . Otherwise, method  700  typically continues at block  770 . 
         [0065]    Block  760  typically indicates sending the message in the send buffer. Generally this message is a non-ping message that may have been previously sent, but being in the race fix state and the receipt of a ping message results in resending the buffered message. Once the buffered message has been sent, method  700  typically continues at block  770 . 
         [0066]    Block  770  typically indicates the C3P instance transitioning from the C3P race fix state to the C3P normal state. Once in the C3P normal state processing typically continues as described in connection with  FIG. 5 . 
         [0067]      FIG. 8  is a timing diagram  600   b , an extension of timing diagram  600  of  FIG. 6 , showing an example of a message crisscross and a subsequent recovery. Arrow  610   b  is a continuation of timeline arrow  610  for Node A and arrow  611   b  is a continuation of timeline arrow  611  for Node B. State block  812  represents that same point on timeline  610 / 610   b  as state block  618  of  FIG. 6 . State block  813  represents the same point on timeline  611 / 611   b  as state block  619  of  FIG. 6 . The example message crisscross is shown between messages  820  and  830 . 
         [0068]    Per timing diagram  600   b , Node A sends a message to Node B (as indicated by arrow and message header  820 ) but Node B sends a message to Node A (as indicated by arrow and message header  830 ) prior to receiving message  820  from Node A. This results in a message crisscross as opposed to ordered messaging. 
         [0069]    Upon receiving message  820 , Node B detects that the remote counter value in message header  820  from Node A (RC=12) does not match that of its state information  815  for Node B&#39;s counter (C=13). In this example, this is because of the crisscross of messages  820  and  830 —that is, nodes A and B each sent a message to each other prior to receiving the other&#39;s message, resulting in each node&#39;s state information becoming unsynchronized with that of the other. Similarly, upon receiving message  830 , Node A detects that, the remote counter value in message header  830  from Node B (RC=1) does not match that of its state information  814  for Node A&#39;s counter (C=2), a result of the message crisscross. In this example, crisscrossed messages  820  and  830  are typically dropped by the receiving nodes and each node enters the C3P race fix state as described in connection with  FIG. 3 . 
         [0070]    Per timing diagram  600   b , Node A then sends a C3P ping message to Node B, as indicated by dashed arrow and message header  840 . A C3P ping message is typically a message such as C3P message  200  of  FIG. 2  wherein the application message  220  portion is not included. Such a ping message thus includes a message header, such as C3P header  210  of  FIG. 2 , but no application message. Alternatively or additionally, Node B may send a ping message to Node A as it is also in the C3P race fix state. A ping message generally includes current nonce and counter data thus providing the receiving node with the sending node&#39;s latest state information. Each such ping message communicates, “your turn to send,” to the receiving node. 
         [0071]    Upon receiving ping message  840 , Node B compares the incoming message&#39;s header information to its state information  817  and verifies that the incoming message&#39;s nonce field (N=12) matches its remote nonce state value (RN=12), that the incoming message counter (C=3) is greater than its remote counter state value (RC=2), and that the incoming message&#39;s remote counter value (RC=13) matches its counter state value (C=13). Thus Node B verifies that ping message  840  is valid, updates its state information  819  based on the incoming ping message, and transitions from the C3P race fix state to the C3P normal state. Further, Node B re-sends the message in its send buffer, message  830 , as indicated by arrow and message header  850 . 
         [0072]    Upon receiving message  850 , Node A compares the incoming message&#39;s header information to its state information  818  and verifies the message is valid. Because incoming message  850  is valid, Node A transitions from the C3P race fix state to the C3P normal state. Because message  850  is valid and because it is not a C3P ping message, Node A recognizes that application message  820  must be deleted from the send buffer (only one message from the pair that led to the crisscross may be delivered, and the buffered message on Node A in this example is the one that must not be delivered). 
         [0073]    At this point both Node A and Node B have successfully transitioned from the C3P race fix state back to the C3P normal state and ordered message communication can continue. 
         [0074]    Alternative methods for exiting the race fix state may also be employed. For example, a node in the C3P race fix state may exit the race fix state after having sent a specified number of ping messages. Such a change may have the negative consequence of delaying the resumption of ordered message communication, but may have the positive consequence of conserving network resources. As a second example, instead of sending the C3P ping messages once a crisscross has been detected, each node may instead send their normal messages with updated counter values. Such a change may have the negative consequence of using significantly more network resources if further message crisscrosses occur (because application messages may be much larger than C3P ping messages), but it may have the positive consequence of avoiding an extra message delay if no further message crisscrosses occur. As a third example, the nonces between a node A and a node B that are communicating may be collapsed into a single nonce by using a handshake analogous to the SYN/SYN-ACK handshake in the Transmission Control Protocol (“TCP”); this may have the positive consequence of reducing the state associated with the C3P layer and the C3P header but may have the negative consequence of requiring additional messages when two nodes first communicate via C3P. 
         [0075]      FIG. 9  is a block diagram showing an example computing environment  900  in which the technologies described herein may be implemented. A suitable computing environment may be implemented with numerous general purpose or special purpose systems. Examples of well known systems may include, but are not limited to, cell phones, personal digital assistants (“PDA”), personal computers (“PC”), hand-held or laptop devices, microprocessor-based systems, multiprocessor systems, servers, workstations, consumer electronic devices, set-top boxes, and the like. 
         [0076]    Computing environment  900  typically includes a general-purpose computing system in the form of a computing device  901  coupled to various components, such as peripheral devices  902 ,  903 ,  904  and the like. System  900  may couple to various other components, such as input devices  903 , including voice recognition, touch pads, buttons, keyboards and/or pointing devices, such as a mouse or trackball, via one or more input/output (“I/O”) interfaces  912 . The components of computing device  901  may include one or more processors (including central processing units (“CPU”), graphics processing units (“CPU”), microprocessors (“μP”), and the like)  907 , system memory  909 , and a system bus  90 S that typically couples the various components. Processor  907  typically processes or executes various computer-executable instructions to control the operation of computing device  901  and to communicate with other electronic and/or computing devices, systems or environment (not shown) via various communications connections such as a network connection  914  or the like. System bus  908  represents any number of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a serial bus, an accelerated graphics port, a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures, and the like. 
         [0077]    System memory  909  may include computer readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (“RAM”), and/or non-volatile memory, such as read only memory (“ROM”) or flash memory (“FLASH”). A basic input/output system (“BIOS”) may be stored in non-volatile or the like. System memory  909  typically stores data, computer-executable instructions and/or program modules comprising computer-executable instructions that are immediately accessible to and/or presently operated on by one or more of the processors  907 . 
         [0078]    Mass storage devices  904  and  910  may be coupled to computing device  901  or incorporated into computing device  901  via coupling to the system bus. Such mass storage devices  904  and  910  may include non-volatile RAM, a magnetic disk drive which reads from and/or writes to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”)  905 , and/or an optical disk drive that reads from and/or writes to a non-volatile optical disk such as a CD ROM, DVD ROM  906 . Alternatively, a mass storage device, such as hard disk  910 , may include non-removable storage medium. Other mass storage devices may include memory cards, memory sticks, tape storage devices, and the like. 
         [0079]    Any number of computer programs, files, data structures, and the like may be stored in mass storage  910 , other storage devices  904 ,  905 ,  906  and system memory  909  (typically limited by available space) including, byway of example and not limitation, operating systems, application programs, data files, directory structures, computer-executable instructions, and the like. 
         [0080]    Output components or devices, such as display device  902 , may be coupled to computing device  901 , typically via an interface such as a display adapter  911 . Output device  902  may be a liquid crystal display (“LCD”). Other example output devices may include printers, audio outputs, voice outputs, cathode ray tube (“CRT”) displays, tactile devices or other sensory output mechanisms, or the like. Output devices may enable computing device  901  to interact with human operators or other machines, systems, computing environments, or the like. A user may interface with computing environment  900  via any number of different I/O devices  903  such as a touch pad, buttons, keyboard, mouse, joystick, game pad, data port, and the like. These and other I/O devices may be coupled to processor  907  via I/O interfaces  912  which may be coupled to system bus  908 , and/or may be coupled by other interfaces and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port, universal serial bus (“USB”), fire wire, infrared (“IR”) port, and the like. 
         [0081]    Computing device  901  may operate in a networked environment via communications connections to one or more remote computing devices through one or more cellular networks, wireless networks, local area networks (“LAN”), wide area networks (“WAN”), storage area networks (“SAN”), the internet, radio links, optical links and the like. Computing device  901  may be coupled to a network via network adapter  91  or the like, or, alternatively, via a modern, digital subscriber line (“DSL”) link, integrated services digital network (“ISDN”) link, Internet link, wireless link, or the like. 
         [0082]    Communications connection  914 , such as a network connection, typically provides a coupling to communications media, such as a network. Communications media typically provide computer-readable and computer-executable instructions, data structures, files, program modules and other data using a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism. The term “modulated data signal” typically means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. Byway of example, and not limitation, communications media may include wired media, such as a wired network or direct-wired connection or the like, and wireless media, such as acoustic, radio frequency, infrared, or other wireless communications mechanisms. 
         [0083]    Power source  990 , such as a battery or a power supply, typically provides power for portions or all of computing environment  900 . In the case of the computing environment  900  being a mobile device or portable device or the like, power source  990  may be a battery. Alternatively, in the case computing environment  900  is a desktop computer or server or the like, power source  990  may be a power supply designed to connect to an alternating current (“AC”) source, such as via a wall outlet. 
         [0084]    Some mobile devices may not include many of the components described in connection with  FIG. 9 . For example, an electronic badge may be comprised of a coil of wire along with a simple processing unit  907  or the like, the coil configured to act as power source  990  when in proximity to a card reader device or the like. Such a coil may also be configure to act as an antenna coupled to the processing unit  907  or the like, the coil antenna capable of providing a form of communication between the electronic badge and the card reader device. Such communication may not involve networking, but may alternatively be general or special purpose communications via telemetry, point-to-point, RF, IR, audio, or other means. An electronic card may not include display  902 , I/O device  903 , or many of the other components described in connection with  FIG. 9 . Other mobile devices that may not include many of the components described in connection with  FIG. 9 , byway of example and not limitation, include electronic bracelets, electronic tags, implantable devices, and the like. 
         [0085]    Those skilled in the art will realize that storage devices utilized to provide computer-readable and computer-executable instructions and data can be distributed over a network. For example, a remote computer or storage device may store computer-readable and computer-executable instructions in the form of software applications and data. A local computer may access the remote computer or storage device via the network and download part, or ail of a software application or data and may execute any computer-executable instructions. Alternatively, the local computer may download pieces of the software or data as needed, or process the software in a distributed manner by executing some of the instructions at, the local computer and some at remote computers and/or devices. 
         [0086]    Those skilled in the art will also realize that, by utilizing conventional techniques, all or portions of the software&#39;s computer-executable instructions may be carried out by a dedicated electronic circuit such as a digital signal processor (“DSP”), programmable logic array (“PLA”), discrete circuits, and the like. The term “electronic apparatus” may include computing devices or consumer electronic devices comprising any software, firmware or the like, or electronic devices or circuits comprising no software, firmware or the like. 
         [0087]    The term “firmware” typically refers to executable instructions, code, data, applications, programs, or the like maintained in an electronic device such as a ROM. The term “software” generally refers to executable instructions, code, data, applications, programs, or the like maintained in or on any form of computer-readable media. The term “computer-readable media” typically refers to system memory, storage devices and their associated media, and the like. 
         [0088]    In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the present invention and the forgoing examples may be applied, it should be recognized that the examples described herein are meant to be illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the invention as described herein contemplates ail such embodiments as may come within the scope of the following claims and any equivalents thereto.