Abstract:
The present invention relates to an airbag fabric comprising a polyester fiber, and more particularly to a polyester fabric having a thermal resistance constant (X) of 1.0 to 6.5 in the uncoated fabric state, a preparation method for the same, and an airbag for vehicle comprising the same. 
     The airbag fabric of the present invention uses a polyester fiber having low Young&#39;s modulus, high strength and high elongation to impart good mechanical properties, such as high strength and high thermal resistance, and good folding property, high dimensional stability, and good air sealing effect as well, thereby minimizing collision impacts on occupants to protect the occupants with safety.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to an airbag fabric and a preparation method for the same, and more particularly to a polyester fabric, a preparation method for the same, and an airbag for vehicle comprising the same, where the polyester fabric uses a polyester fiber having low Young&#39;s modulus, high strength, and high elongation to impart good mechanical properties, such as high strength and high thermal resistance. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    Generally, an airbag refers to a vehicle safety device for providing protection to the occupants during a frontal vehicle collision at an impact speed of about 40 km/h or above by deploying explosive chemicals to generate a gas and inflate the airbag cushion upon sensing a crash with a crash impact sensor. The structure of a general airbag system is as illustrated in  FIG. 1 . 
         [0003]    As shown in  FIG. 1 , a general airbag system comprises an airbag module  100  mounted in the steering wheel and containing an inflator  121  for generating gas upon ignition triggered by a detonator  122 , and an airbag  124  being inflated by the gas to spread out toward the driver; an impact sensor  130  for generating impact signals in the event of a collision; and an electronic control module  110  for igniting the detonator  122  of the inflator  121  upon receiving the impact signals. In the event of a frontal collision, the impact sensor  130  in the airbag system senses collision impacts to send impact signals to the electronic control module  110 . Upon recognition of the impact signals, the electronic control module  110  triggers the detonator  122  to ignite the gas generator propellant in the inflator  121 . The ignited gas generator propellant rapidly generates a gas to inflate an airbag  124 . Being inflated to unfold, the airbag collides with the driver&#39;s chest to partly absorb the impact load caused by the vehicle collision. Inertia causes the driver&#39;s head and chest move toward to collide with the airbag  124 , in which case the gas of the airbag  124  rapidly exits through the exhaust holes formed in the airbag  124  to cushion the driver&#39;s head and chest. In this manner, the airbag system effectively relieves impacts on the driver in the event of a frontal collision to reduce the risk of secondary injuries. 
         [0004]    It is therefore of a great importance to secure flexibility for reducing impacts on the occupants as well as good mechanical properties, such as low air permeability to facilitate airbag unfolding, and high strength and high thermal resistance to prevent damage or rupture of the airbag, folding property, with a view to effectively maintaining folding and packing properties of the airbag when installed into a vehicle, preventing damage or rupture of the airbag, acquiring high unfolding performance of the airbag cushion and minimizing impacts on the occupants. In fact, there have never been suggested airbag fabrics capable of maintaining air sealing effect and flexibility for the occupant&#39;s safety, sufficiently enduring impacts on the airbag, and being packed into a vehicle effectively. 
         [0005]    Conventionally, polyamide fibers such as nylon 66 have been used as a material for airbag fabric. Despite high impact resistance, nylon 66 is inferior to polyester fibers in regard to resistance to heat and humidity, light resistance, and dimensional stability, and more expensive. 
         [0006]    Japanese Patent Publication No. Hei 04-214437 discloses the use of a polyester fiber overcoming these problems. However, the use of the conventional polyester fiber in the manufacture of an airbag leads to difficulty in packing the airbag into a small space in a vehicle due to extremely high stiffness, excessive thermal shrinkage during heat treatment at high temperature due to high elasticity and low elongation, and limitations in maintaining good mechanical properties and unfolding performance under severe conditions of high temperature and high humidity. 
         [0007]    Accordingly, there is a need for developing a fabric capable of maintaining good mechanical properties and air sealing effect to be suitable for use in airbags for vehicle and providing good properties, such as high thermal resistance to endure heat treatment at high temperature, high flexibility to reduce impacts on occupants, and good packing property. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0008]    It is an object of the present invention to provide a polyester fabric having good mechanical properties, such as high strength and high thermal resistance, high flexibility, and good packing property. 
         [0009]    It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing the polyester fabric. 
         [0010]    It is still another object of the present invention to provide an airbag for vehicle comprising the polyester fabric. 
         [0011]    To achieve the objects of the present invention, there is provided a polyester fabric having a thermal resistance constant (X) of 1.0 to 6.5 as defined by the following calculation formula 1 when the fabric is uncoated: 
         [0000]      Thermal resistance constant( X )=( T×t )/(600 ×D )   [Calculation Formula 1]
 
         [0012]    In the calculation formula 1, T is the temperature of a hot rod during free fall in the range of 350 to 750° C.; t is the amount of time (sec) taken for the hot rod to pass through the polyester fabric from a point of contact with the polyester fabric; and D is the thickness (mm) of the polyester fabric. 
         [0013]    There is also provided a method for preparing the polyester fabric that comprises: weaving a polyester fiber into a grey fabric for airbag; scouring the grey fabric for airbag; and tentering the scoured fabric. 
         [0014]    Further, there is provided an airbag for vehicle comprising the polyester fabric. 
         [0015]    Hereinafter, a detailed description will be given as to a polyester fabric, a preparation method for the same, and an airbag for vehicle comprising the same in accordance with specified embodiments of the present invention, which are given by way of illustration only and not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications are available to the embodiments within the scope of the present invention. 
         [0016]    Unless stated otherwise, the terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes” and/or “including” as used herein specify the presence of stated elements (or components) without any specific limitations but do not preclude the addition of other elements (or components). 
         [0017]    The term “airbag fabric” as used herein refers to a woven or nonwoven fabric used in the manufacture of airbags for vehicle. The airbag fabrics used in common include a plain woven fabric of Nylon 6 which is woven with a Rapier spinning machine, or a nonwoven fabric of Nylon 6. But, the airbag fabric of the present invention uses a polyester fiber and thus features good mechanical properties, such as high toughness, high tear strength, etc. 
         [0018]    To use a polyester fiber as an airbag fiber instead of a polyamide fiber such as Nylon 66 that has been used in the prior art, it is required to overcome the problems in association with the use of the polyester fiber, including deterioration of the folding property resulting from high Young&#39;s modulus and high stiffness of the polyester fiber, deterioration of the mechanical properties pertaining to low melting heat capacity (ΔH), and the consequent deterioration of the unfolding performance. 
         [0019]    Compared with Nylon, the polyester fiber exhibits higher stiffness due to its specific molecular structure and thus features higher Young&#39;s modulus. Hence, the use of the polyester fiber in an airbag fabric which is folded into a vehicle leads to drastic deterioration of the packing property. Further, the carboxyl end group (hereinafter, referred to as “CEG”) in the polyester molecular chain attacks the ester bond under severe conditions of high temperature and high humidity to break the molecular chain apart, deteriorating the properties with the progress of aging. 
         [0020]    Accordingly, the present invention can improve the properties when applied as an airbag fabric by using a polyester fiber having low Young&#39;s modulus, high strength and high elongation and thereby optimizing the thermal resistance constant of the polyester fiber, to secure good mechanical properties and air sealing performance and remarkably reduce the stiffness. 
         [0021]    Particularly, a series of experiments carried out by the inventors of the present invention have revealed that the use of a polyester fabric having defined characteristics in preparing an airbag fabric enables the airbag fabric to maintain good mechanical properties (e.g., high strength and high thermal resistance), air leak protecting performance, packaging performance, etc. under severe conditions of high temperature and high humidity and enhances folding property, dimensional stability, and air sealing effect, thereby securing more enhanced packing properties when the fabric used as an airbag fabric is packed into a vehicle. 
         [0022]    In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a polyester fabric having defined characteristics. Such a polyester fabric has a thermal resistance constant (X) of 1.0 to 6.5 as defined by the following calculation formula 1 when the fabric is uncoated: 
         [0000]      Thermal resistance constant( X )=( T×t )/(600 ×D )   [Calculation Formula 1]
 
         [0023]    In the calculation formula 1, T is the temperature of a hot rod during free fall in the range of 350 to 750° C. (degree celsius); t is the amount of time (sec) taken for the hot rod to pass through the polyester fabric from a point of contact with the polyester fabric; and D is the thickness (mm) of the polyester fabric. 
         [0024]    From the results of a series of experiments, the inventors of the present invention have found it out that the use of a specific polyester fabric having an optimized thermal resistance constant in a defined range can provide an airbag fabric capable of effectively absorbing and enduring energy of the high temperature high pressure gas. More specifically, the “uncoated” polyester fabric before the coating process has a thermal resistance constant (X) of 1.0 to 6.5, preferably 1.1 to 5.8, and thus can be used as an airbag fabric very effectively. 
         [0025]    The term “thermal resistance constant” as used herein refers to the retention time taken for a hot rod to pass through the polyester fabric based on the thickness of the polyester fabric, as defined by the calculation formula 1, and represents the thermal resistance index of the airbag fabric under high-temperature conditions. The thermal resistance constant is a random value varying depending on the material of the airbag fabric, and used to make simulation predicting how much an airbag fabric can endure the instantaneous high temperature high pressure gas ejected from the inflator in the event of airbag unfolding. The higher melting heat capacity ΔH of the polyester fabric for airbag leads to the higher thermal resistance of the polyester fabric. 
         [0026]    Particularly, the lower thermal resistance of the polyester fabric deteriorates the thermal resistance of the fabric to endure the high temperature high pressure gas ejected from the inflator upon airbag unfolding, so the airbag fabric using the polyester fabric is susceptible to rupture or thermal bonding. Hence, the polyester fabric of the present invention cannot be used as an airbag fabric, when the thermal resistance constant is less than 1.0 for the uncoated fabric before the coating process using a rubber component. The extremely high thermal resistance constant of the polyester fabric leads to an extremely high degree of crystallization, thereby concentrating stress on crystals to deteriorate the mechanical properties of the airbag fabric, such as tensile strength and tear strength. Thus when the thermal resistance constant is greater than 6.5 for the uncoated polyester fabric before the coating process using a copper component, the polyester fabric can hardly secure sufficient mechanical properties as an airbag fabric. 
         [0027]    For the polyester fabric of the present invention not coated with a rubber component, the thermal resistance constant X as defined by the calculation formula 1 is 1.20 to 3.5, preferably 1.28 to 3.0 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 450° C.; and 1.0 to 2.0, preferably 1.05 to 1.8 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 600° C. Further, the thermal resistance constant X as defined by the calculation formula 1 is 4.2 to 6.0, preferably 4.4 to 5.7 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 350° C.; and 1.0 to 1.8, preferably 1.1 to 1.5 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 750° C. 
         [0028]    The polyester fabric for airbag according to the present invention may comprise a rubber coating layer, which is applied on the surface of the polyester fabric by coating or lamination. The rubber-coated polyester fabric may have a thermal resistance constant X of 2.8 to 17.0, preferably 3.0 to 16.5. 
         [0029]    The rubber component as used herein includes at least one selected from the group consisting of powdered silicone rubber, liquid silicone rubber, polyurethane, chloroprene, neoprene rubber, and emulsion type silicone resin. The type of the rubber component for the coating layer is not specifically limited to those substances listed above, but the silicone coating is desirable with a view to eco-friendliness and mechanical properties. 
         [0030]    The coating weight per unit area of the rubber coating layer is 20 to 200 g/m 2 , preferably 20 to 100 g/m 2 . More specifically, the coating weight is preferably 30 to 95 g/m 2  for OPW (One Piece Woven) type side curtains or airbag fabrics, and 20 to 50 g/m 2  for plain woven airbag fabrics. 
         [0031]    For the polyester fabric comprising a rubber coating layer, the thermal resistance constant X as defined by the calculation formula 1 is 3.3 to 10.0, preferably 3.5 to 9.5 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 450° C.; and 3.0 to 7.0, preferably 3.2 to 6.5 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 600° C. Further, the thermal resistance constant X as defined by the calculation formula 1 is 9.5 to 17.0, preferably 10.0 to 16.5 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 350° C.; and 2.8 to 6.0, preferably 3.0 to 5.8 when the temperature T of the hot rod is 750° C. 
         [0032]    According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the thermal resistance constant can be determined with a hot rod tester as illustrated in  FIG. 2 . In the hot rod tester, the hot rod is heated up to 350 to 750° C., preferably 380 to 720° C. and arranged to drop from the above the fabric. The hot rod in a state of free fall is dropped down to the polyester fabric. The period of time taken for the hot rod to completely pass through the polyester fabric from the point of contact with the fabric is measured and applied to the calculation formula 1 based on the thickness of the polyester fabric to calculate the thermal resistance constant of the polyester fabric. 
         [0033]    In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the hot rod can be placed above the polyester fabric at a distance “d” of about 60 to 85 mm. The hot rod as used herein is made of a metal or ceramic material having a thermal conductivity of 40 to 70 W/m·K and a weight of 35 to 65 g. 
         [0034]    The thickness of the polyester fabric, as measured according to the ASTM D 1777 method, is 0.18 to 0.43 mm, preferably 0.25 to 0.38 mm in view of securing good packing and folding properties when the airbag is packed into a vehicle, as well as good mechanical properties and good air sealing performance. Further, the thickness of the polyester fabric may be 0.18 mm or greater mm in consideration of the tear strength and the air sealing performance of the airbag cushion; and 0.43 mm or less considering the folding property of the airbag cushion. 
         [0035]    In the airbag fabric of the present invention, the polyester fabric may comprise a polyester fiber having different values of fineness. The fineness of the polyester fiber may have an influence on the optimum range of the thermal resistance constant to secure good mechanical properties and high thermal resistance for the airbag fabric using the polyester fiber. Preferably, the polyester fabric may comprise a polyester fiber having a fineness of 400 to 650 denier. The polyester fiber may have a fineness of 400 to 650 denier in order to maintain low fineness and high strength in consideration of the folding property of the air cushion and the absorption performance to absorb the high temperature high pressure energy generated during airbag unfolding. Preferably, the polyester fiber has a fineness of 400 denier or greater in consideration of the energy absorption performance; and 650 denier or less with a view to providing good folding property for the air cushion. 
         [0036]    The polyester fabric for airbag according to the present invention has a toughness of 3.5 to 6.0 kJ/m 3 , preferably 3.8 to 5.7 kJ/m 3 , where the toughness is defined by the following calculation formula 2: 
         [0000]      Toughness(work of rupture)=∫ 0   strain    F·dl    [Calculation Formula 2]
 
         [0037]    In the calculation formula 2, F denotes the load applied when the length of the polyester fiber or fabric is increased by dl; and dl is the increment of the length of the polyester fiber or fabric. 
         [0038]    Compared with the conventional fabrics, the polyester fabric has a higher level of toughness (work of rupture) and thus more effectively absorbs the energy of high temperature high pressure gas. The term “toughness” as used herein is defined as the amount of energy that the fabric can absorb before rupturing under the tensile force, and also defined as the resistance to an instantaneous impact. When the length of a fiber is increased from 1 to 1+dl under load F, the work is F·dl, and the toughness required to break the fiber is given by the calculation formula 2. In other words, the toughness is given by the area underneath the strength-elongation curve of the fiber or the fabric. The fabric exhibits higher toughness with an increase in the strength and elongation of the fiber used to form the fabric. Particularly, the airbag fabric with low toughness is susceptible to rupture, because the low toughness results in low resistance to the instantaneous unfolding impact from the inflator under high temperature high pressure conditions in the event of airbag unfolding. Accordingly, the fabric of the present invention of which the toughness is, for example, below 3.5 kJ/m 3  is unsuitable for use as an airbag fabric. 
         [0039]    Further, the airbag fabric of the present invention concentrates the stress when inflated by an instantaneous great force from the high temperature and high pressure gas during airbag unfolding and thus exhibits a high level of tear strength. The tear strength indicates the amount of force required to rupture the airbag fabric and is measured according to the ASTM D 2261 TONGUE method. The tear strength of the airbag fabric is 18 to 30 kgf for an uncoated fabric not comprising a separate rubber coating layer; and 30 to 60 kgf for a coated fabric. In this regard, the tear strength of the airbag fabric below the lower limit of the defined range, that is, less than 18 kgf for an uncoated fabric or less than 30 kgf for a coated fabric leads to a rupture of the airbag during unfolding, consequently with a risk of airbag malfunction. On the other hand, the tear strength of the airbag fabric above the upper limit of the defined range, that is, greater than 30 kgf for an uncoated fabric or greater than 60 kgf for a coated fabric leads to lower edge comb resistance of the fabric, abruptly deteriorating air sealing performance during airbag unfolding. 
         [0040]    Generally, a polyester fiber has such a molecular structure that imparts higher stiffness than nylon fibers or the like, consequently with higher Young&#39;s modulus, so the use of the polyester fiber for an airbag fabric leads to considerable deterioration of folding and packing properties to make the airbag fabric difficult to pack into a small space of a vehicle. Accordingly, the present invention uses a polyester fiber with high strength and low Young&#39;s modulus to maintain the toughness and tear strength of the fabric and greatly reduce the stiffness of the fabric. The airbag fabric of the present invention has a stiffness of 1.5 kgf or less, or 0.2 to 1.5 kgf, preferably 0.3 to 1.2 kgf, more preferably 0.4 to 0.8 kgf, where the stiffness is measured according to the ASTM D 4032 method. Like this, the airbag fabric of the present invention having a remarkably low stiffness relative to the conventional polyester fabric can acquire good folding property, high flexibility, and enhanced packing property while being packed into a vehicle. 
         [0041]    To be used for airbags, the fabric of the present invention preferably has a stiffness maintained in the defined range. An extremely low stiffness of the fabric cannot secure supportive and protective functions when the airbag is inflated to unfold; while an extremely high stiffness of the fabric may reduce dimensional stability and thus deteriorate packing property when the airbag is packed into the vehicle. Further, the desirable stiffness of the fabric is 1.5 kgf or less, particularly, 0.8 kgf or less for a fineness below 460 denier, and 1.5 kgf or less for a fineness of 550 denier or greater, with a view to preventing deterioration of the packing property due to difficulty of folding the extremely stiff fabric, and avoiding discoloration of the fabric. 
         [0042]    The static air permeability of the uncoated airbag fabric of the present invention (as measured according to the ASTM D 737 method) is 10.0 cfm or less, preferably 0.3 to 8.0 cfm, more preferably 0.5 to 5.0 cfm when ΔP is 125 pa; and 14 cfm or less, preferably 4 to 12 cfm when ΔP is 500 pa. Further, the dynamic air permeability of the uncoated airbag fabric (as measured according to the ASTM D 6476 method) is 1,700 mm/s or less, preferably 200 to 1,600 mm/s, more preferably 400 to 1,400 mm/s. The term “static air permeability” as used herein refers to the quantity of air penetrating into the airbag fabric under a predetermined pressure. The static air permeability decreases with a decrease in the filament fineness (denier per filament) of the fiber and an increase in the density of the fabric. The term “dynamic air permeability” as used herein refers to the quantity of air penetrating into the airbag fabric under an average instantaneous differential pressure of 30 to 70 kPa. In the same manner of the static air permeability, the dynamic air permeability decreases with a decrease in the filament fineness of the fiber and an increase in the density of the fabric. 
         [0043]    By including a rubber coating layer, the airbag fabric can have a considerably reduced air permeability, approximating to 0 cfm. Due to the rubber coating layer, the static air permeability of the coated airbag fabric according to the present invention (as measured according to the ASTM D 737 method) is 2.0 cfm or less, preferably 0.3 to 1.7 cfm, more preferably 0.5 to 1.5 cfm, when ΔP is 125 pa; and 12 cfm or less, preferably 4 to 10 cfm, when ΔP is 500 pa. The dynamic air permeability of the coated fabric (as measured according to the ASTM D 6476 method) is 1,700 mm/s or less, preferably 200 to 1,600 mm/s, more preferably 400 to 1,400 mm/s. 
         [0044]    In view of maintaining the packaging performance of the airbag fabric, it may not be desirable that the airbag fabric, either uncoated or coated, has the static air permeability or the dynamic air permeability above the upper limit of the corresponding air permeability range as defined above. 
         [0045]    The airbag fabric may have a breaking elongation as measured at the room temperature according to the ASTM D 5034 method in the range of 25 to 60%, preferably about 30 to 50%. Preferably, the breaking elongation is 25% or greater in consideration of the toughness of the fabric, and 60% or less considering the edge comb resistance. 
         [0046]    Further, the shrinkage of the fabric in the warp or weft direction as measured according to the ASTM D 1776 method is 1.0% or less, preferably 0.8% or less. Most preferably, the shrinkage in the warp or weft direction is not greater than 1.0% in consideration of the dimensional stability. 
         [0047]    Preferably, the present invention is capable of maintaining such enhanced properties throughout an aging process carried out in different ways with a view to securing good performance as an airbag fabric. The aging process may include at least one selected from the group consisting of heat aging, cycle aging, and humidity aging. It is preferable for the airbag fabric to maintain high levels of strengths or other properties throughout all the three aging processes. 
         [0048]    In this regard, the heat aging involves conducting a heat treatment on the fabric at high temperature, preferably in the range of 110 to 130° C. for 300 hours or more, or 300 to 500 hours. The cycle aging includes conducting heat aging, humidity aging and cold aging in cycles. Preferably, the cycle aging involves repeatedly conducting 2 to 5 cycles of a first aging at 30 to 45° C. and 93 to 97% in relative humidity (RH) for 12 to 48 hours, a second aging at 70 to 120° C. for 12 to 48 hours, and a third aging at −10 to −45° C. for 12 to 48 hours. The humidity aging includes conducting an aging under conditions of high temperature and high humidity, preferably at 60 to 90° C. and 93 to 97% RH for 300 hours or more, or 300 to 500 hours. 
         [0049]    Particularly, the airbag fabric of the present invention has strength retention of at least 80%, preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, where the strength retention of the fabric is determined by calculating the percentage (%) of the strength after aging under the defined conditions with respect to the strength measured at the room temperature. Like this, the present invention can maintain high levels of strength and strength retention throughout a long-term aging under severe conditions of high temperature and high humidity, resulting in high performance as an airbag fabric. 
         [0050]    In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a polyester fabric for airbag prepared from a polyester fiber having defined characteristics. The polyester fabric may comprise a polyester fiber having a filament fineness of 2.5 to 6.8 DPF, each fiber comprising at least 110 filaments. 
         [0051]    Rather than using the conventional high-modulus polyester fiber with high strength and low elongation, the present invention uses a low-modulus polyester fiber having high strength and high elongation to provide a polyester fabric for airbag, which is superior in dimensional stability, air sealing performance, and folding property, as well as in energy absorption performance during inflation of the airbag. 
         [0052]    The polyester fabric for airbag according to the present invention may comprise a polyester fiber having different values of fineness. The fineness of the polyester fiber may have an influence on the optimum range of the thermal resistance constant for securing good mechanical properties and high thermal resistance for the airbag fabric using the polyester fiber. Preferably, the polyester fabric may comprise a polyester fiber having a fineness of 400 to 650 denier. The polyester fiber may have a fineness of 400 to 650 denier in order to maintain low fineness and high strength in consideration of the folding property of the air cushion and the absorption performance for absorbing the high temperature high pressure energy generated during airbag unfolding. Preferably, the polyester fiber has a fineness of 400 denier or greater in consideration of the energy absorption performance; and 650 denier or less with a view to providing good folding property for the air cushion. 
         [0053]    The polyester fabric may use a polyester fiber prepared from polyester chips having an intrinsic viscosity of 1.05 to 2.0 dl/g, preferably 1.10 to 1.90 dl/g. To maintain good properties throughout the aging process at the room temperature and under severe conditions of high temperature and high humidity, the polyester fiber is prepared from polyester chips having an intrinsic viscosity of 1.05 dl/g or above. For acquiring low shrinkage, the polyester fabric preferably comprises a polyester fiber prepared from polyester chips having an intrinsic viscosity of 2.0 dl/g or below. 
         [0054]    Preferably, the polyester fiber has a shrinkage stress of 0.005 to 0.075 g/d at 150° C. which corresponds to the laminate coating temperature for general coated fabrics; and 0.005 to 0.075 g/d at 200° C. which corresponds to the sol coating temperature for general coated fabrics. In other words, the shrinkage stress of 0.005 g/d or greater at 150° C. or 200° C. prevents the fabric sagging under the heat during the coating process, and the shrinkage stress of 0.075 g/d or less reduces the relaxation stress in the process of cooling down to the room temperature subsequent to the coating process. 
         [0055]    At least a predetermined level of tension is imposed on the polyester fiber during the heat treatment of the coating process to maintain the woven shape of the fiber, so the shrinkage at 177° C. is preferably 6.5% or below with a view to preventing deformation of the airbag fabric. 
         [0056]    The shrinkage stress as defined herein is based on the measurement value under a fixed load of 0.10 g/d, and the shrinkage is based on the measurement value under a fixed load of 0.01 g/d. 
         [0057]    The polyester fiber is preferably a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fiber, more preferably a PET fiber comprising at least 70 mol. % of PET, most preferably a PET fiber comprising at least 90 mol. % of PET. 
         [0058]    The higher filament count results in the softer the polyester fiber, but an extremely high filament count leads to low spinnability. Therefore, the filament count is preferably in the range of 96 to 160. 
         [0059]    For the polyester fiber, Young&#39;s modulus at 1% elongation, that is, at position where the fiber has elongation of 1% is in the range of 60 to 100 g/de, preferably 75 to 95 g/de; and Young&#39;s modulus at 2% elongation, that is, at position where the fiber has elongation of 2% is in the range of 20 to 60 g/de, preferably 22 to 55 g/de, where the Young&#39;s modulus is measured according to the ASTM D 885 method. The present invention can prepare a novel airbag fabric using a polyester fiber having far lower initial Young&#39;s modulus, in comparison with the conventional polyester fiber of which the Young&#39;s modulus at 1% elongation is at least 110 g/de and the Young&#39;s modulus at 2% elongation is at least 80. g/de. 
         [0060]    The Young&#39;s modulus of the polyester fiber is the modulus of elasticity defined as the slope in the elastic portion of the stress-strain curve obtained in the tensile testing and corresponds to the elastic modulus describing how much an object is elongated and deformed as the object is stretched at both ends. The fiber with high Young&#39;s modulus has good elasticity but results in deteriorated stiffness of the fabric; while the fiber with extremely low Young&#39;s modulus has good stiffness, but with low elastic recovery, deteriorating the toughness of the fabric. In this regard, the airbag fabric prepared from a polyester fiber having a relatively low initial Young&#39;s modulus overcomes the problems in association with high stiffness of the conventional polyester fabric and secures excellences in folding and packing properties and flexibility. 
         [0061]    The polyester fiber has a tensile strength of 8.8 g/d or greater, preferably 8.8 to 10.0 g/d, more preferably 9.2 to 9.8 g/d; and a breaking elongation of 14 to 23%, preferably 15 to 22%. Further, the fiber has a dry shrinkage of 6.5% or less, or 1.0 to 6.5%, preferably 2.0 to 5.6%; and a melting heat capacity ΔH of 40 to 65 J/g, preferably 45 to 58 J/g. 
         [0062]    As described above, the polyester fabric of the present invention is prepared using a polyester fiber having intrinsic viscosity, initial Young&#39;s modulus, and elongation in optimized ranges to impart good performance for the airbag fabric. 
         [0063]    The polyester fiber can be prepared by melt-spinning a PET polymer into an undrawn fiber and then drawing the undrawn fiber. The specific conditions or procedures of the individual steps affect the properties of the polyester fiber directly or indirectly and thus contribute to the production of a polyester fiber suitable for use in the airbag fabric of the present invention. 
         [0064]    In accordance with a more preferred embodiment of the present invention, the low-modulus polyester fiber with high strength and high elongation can be prepared by a method that comprises: melt-spinning a high-viscosity polymer comprising at least 70 mol % of polyethylene terephthalate and having an intrinsic viscosity of at least 1.05 dl/g at a low temperature of 200 to 300° C. to form a undrawn polyester fiber; and drawing the undrawn polyester fiber at a draw ratio of 5.0 to 6.0. In this method, a high-viscosity PET polymer having a low CEG (carboxyl end group) content, preferably 30 meq/kg or less, is subjected to melt spinning at low temperature, more preferably at low temperature and low spinning rate, where the melt-spinning process suppresses a decrease of intrinsic viscosity and an increase of CEG content to the maximum extent, maintaining good mechanical properties of the fiber and securing high elongation. Moreover, the subsequent drawing process which involves drawing at an optimized draw ratio of 5.0 to 6.0 can suppress a decrease of elongation to the maximum extent and thereby produce a low-modulus polyester fiber with high strength and high elongation, which can be effectively used in the manufacture of airbag fabrics. 
         [0065]    In this regard, the higher temperature, for example, above 300° C. in the melt spinning process leads to thermal degradation of the PET polymer in great extent, intensifying a decrease of intrinsic viscosity and an increase of CEG content, increases molecular orientation to accelerate a decrease of elongation and an increase of Young&#39;s modulus, and causes damage to the surface of the fiber to deteriorate the whole properties of the fiber. An extremely high draw ratio, for example, greater than 6.0 in the drawing process results in excessive drawing, consequently with breaking or irregularity of the drawn fiber, so the resultant polyester fiber cannot have properties desirable for use in airbag fabrics. Further, a relatively low draw ratio in the drawing process leads to a low degree of orientation of the fiber and thus partially drops the strength of the resultant polyester fiber. Therefore, the draw ratio in the drawing process is preferably at least 5.0 to produce a low-modular polyester fiber with high strength and high elongation that are suitable for use in airbag fabrics. 
         [0066]    The subsequent processes can be performed under the conditions optimized with a view to producing a low-modulus polyester fiber with high strength and high elongation at a high draw ratio. For example, in the direct spin draw process for preparing a polyester fiber with low Young&#39;s modulus as well as high strength and low shrinkage, the conditions for the process can be effectively optimized in a way that high-viscosity PET polymer chips are spun by melt spinning and subjected to drawing, thermo-setting, relaxation, and winding through multi-step godet rollers until the fiber is wound on a winder unit. 
         [0067]    In this regard, the drawing process can be performed after the undrawn fiber passes through the godet rollers with an oil pick-up of 0.2 to 2.0%. 
         [0068]    In the relaxation process, the relaxation is preferably in the range of 1 to 14%. The relaxation below 1% provides a polyester fiber that does not have shrinkage but a high degree of orientation likewise at a high draw ratio, resulting in failure to prepare a polyester fiber with high elongation and low Young&#39;s modulus. The relaxation above 14% causes severe vibration of the fiber on the godet rollers, deteriorating workability. 
         [0069]    The drawing process may further include a thermo-setting process for processing the undrawn fiber by heat treatment at approximately 210 to 250° C. More preferably, the heat treatment can be conducted at a temperature of 230 to 250° C. with a view to an appropriate progress of the drawing process to enhance the melting heat capacity ΔH of the fiber for airbag. In this regard, the heat treatment temperature below 210° C. leads to a low degree of crystallization of the polymer and a decrease of relaxation due to insufficient thermal effect, consequently with poor shrinkage; while the heat treatment temperature above 250° C. results in a deterioration of strength and an increase of tar generated on the rollers due to thermal degradation, thus deteriorating workability. 
         [0070]    The winding speed for the drawn fiber passing via the godet rollers is 2,000 to 4,000 m/min, preferably 2,500 to 3,700 m/min. 
         [0071]    Such a process optimization allows production of a polyester fiber for airbag having low initial Young&#39;s modulus, high strength, and high elongation. Further, the optimization of the melt spinning process and the drawing process contributes to minimization of the CEG (Carboxyl End Group) content, where the CEG acts as an acid under high humidity to break the molecular chain of the polyester fiber. The resultant polyester fiber has low initial Young&#39;s modulus and high elongation and thus can be preferably used for airbag fabrics superior in mechanical properties, packing property, dimensional stability, impact resistance, and air sealing performance. 
         [0072]    In accordance with still another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method for preparing an airbag fabric using a polyester fiber. The method for preparing a polyester fabric for airbag comprises: weaving a polyester fiber into a grey fabric for airbag; scouring the grey fabric for airbag; and tentering the scoured fabric. 
         [0073]    In the present invention, the polyester fiber can be processed into the final airbag fabric by known methods of weaving, scouring, and tentering. The weaving type of the fabric is not specifically limited but preferably includes plain weaving or OPW type weaving. 
         [0074]    Particularly, the airbag fabric of the present invention can be prepared from the polyester fiber as warp and weft threads by beaming, weaving, scouring, and tentering. The fabric can be woven with a known weaving machine, which is not specifically limited but includes a rapier loom, an air jet loom, or a water jet loom for plain woven fabrics, and a Jacquard loom for OPW fabrics. 
         [0075]    In comparison with the prior art, the present invention involves a heat treatment process at higher temperature by using a polyester fiber with higher strength, higher elongation, and lower shrinkage. In other words, the woven grey fabric is scoured and tentered, and the tentered fabric is coated with a rubber component, dried and then solidified at a vulcanization temperature of 140 to 210° C., preferably 160 to 200° C., most preferably 175 to 195° C. The vulcanization temperature can be 140° C. or above in consideration of the mechanical properties of the fabric, such as tear strength, and 210° C. or below considering stiffness. Particularly, the heat treatment can be carried out on a multi-step basis in the order of, for example, a first heat treatment at 150 to 170° C., a second heat treatment at 170 to 190° C., and a third heat treatment at 190 to 210° C. 
         [0076]    By preparing the polyester fabric of the present invention through a treat treatment at high temperature, the weave density can be enhanced due to the low-shrinkage characteristic of the polyester fiber, resulting in high dimensional stability and high air sealing performance, enhanced stiffness, and improved tear strength. 
         [0077]    Further, the solidification process may be carried out at the above-defined vulcanization temperature for 30 to 120 seconds, preferably 35 to 100 seconds, most preferably 40 to 90 seconds. The solidification time less than 30 seconds results in a failure to solidify the rubber coating layer, thereby deteriorating the mechanical properties of the fabric and causing defoliation of the coating. The solidification time longer than 120 seconds leads to an increase in the stiffness and thickness of the final fabric product, consequently with deterioration of the folding property. 
         [0078]    For the airbag fabric of the present invention, either one side or both sides of the woven fabric can be coated with the above-mentioned rubber component. The rubber coating layer can be applied by any known coating method, which includes, but is not specifically limited to, knife over-roll coating, doctor blade coating, or spray coating. 
         [0079]    The coated airbag fabric can be processed into an airbag cushion in a defined shape through cutting and sewing processes. The airbag cushion is not specifically limited in shape and may be formed in any normal shape. 
         [0080]    In accordance with a still another embodiment of the present invention, there are provided an airbag for vehicle comprising the polyester fabric, and an airbag system comprising the airbag, where the airbag system can be equipped with devices well-known to those skilled in the art. 
         [0081]    The airbags are classified into frontal airbags and side curtain airbags. The frontal airbags include driver side airbags, passenger side airbags, lateral protection airbags, knee airbags, ankle airbags, pedestrian airbags, and so forth. The side curtain airbags deploy to protect occupants in the event of the vehicle&#39;s side impact collision or rollover. Accordingly, the airbag of the present invention includes both frontal airbags and side curtain airbags. 
         [0082]    The present invention does not preclude addition or omission of the elements or components other than those stated herein under necessity, which are not specifically limited. 
         [0083]    The present invention provides a polyester fabric having good mechanical properties, such as high strength and high thermal resistance, and an airbag for vehicle prepared using the polyester fabric. 
         [0084]    The polyester fabric uses a polyester fiber having low Young&#39;s modulus, high strength, and high elongation to minimize thermal shrinkage throughout the heat treatment at high temperature, provide excellences in thermal resistance, mechanical properties, dimensional stability, and air sealing effect, and also secure good folding property and flexibility, thereby remarkably improving the packing property when the airbag is packed into a vehicle and also minimizing collision impacts on the occupants to protect the occupants with safety. 
         [0085]    Accordingly, the polyester fabric of the present invention is preferably applicable to the manufacture of airbags for vehicle. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0086]      FIG. 1  is an illustration of a general airbag system. 
           [0087]      FIG. 2  shows photographs of a hot rod tester (an instrument for measuring thermal resistance constant) according to one embodiment of the present invention. 
           [0088]      FIG. 3  is a graph plotting the amount of time taken for a hot rod to pass through the uncoated polyester fabric of Example 1 against the hot rod temperature. 
           [0089]      FIG. 4  is a graph plotting the amount of time taken for a hot rod to pass through the uncoated polyester fabric of Comparative Example 1 against the hot rod temperature. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0090]    Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the preferred examples, which are given only to exemplify the present invention and not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. 
       EXAMPLES 1 TO 5 
       [0091]    PET chips with a defined intrinsic viscosity were processed into a polyester fiber through a melt spinning machine in one step. The polyester fiber was woven into a grey fabric for airbag through a rapier loom and subjected to scouring and tentering to prepare an airbag fabric. 
         [0092]    In the regard, Table 1 shows the intrinsic viscosity, CEG content, melt-spinning temperature, draw ratio, and heat treatment temperature of PET chips, the properties of the fiber, such as toughness, tear strength, tensile strength, and melting heat capacity (ΔH), and the warp and weft weave densities, weaving type, heat treatment temperature, rubber component, and coating weight of the fabric. The other conditions are as known in the prior art in association with the preparation of a polyester fabric for airbag. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Examples 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Div. 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 4 
                 5 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 PET content (mol %) 
                 100 
                 100 
                 100 
                 100 
                 100 
               
               
                 Intrinsic viscosity 
                 1.25 
                 1.33 
                 1.40 
                 1.55 
                 1.75 
               
               
                 (dl/g) of PET chip 
               
               
                 CEG content (meq/kg) 
                 30 
                 27 
                 24 
                 23 
                 22 
               
               
                 of PET chip 
               
               
                 Spinning temperature 
                 293 
                 295 
                 295 
                 295 
                 295 
               
               
                 (° C.) 
               
               
                 Draw ratio 
                 5.99 
                 6.03 
                 6.07 
                 6.11 
                 6.15 
               
               
                 Heat treatment 
                 235 
                 239 
                 243 
                 240 
                 244 
               
               
                 temperature 
               
               
                 (° C.) of fiber 
               
               
                 Intrinsic viscosity 
                 0.93 
                 0.97 
                 1.05 
                 1.11 
                 1.20 
               
               
                 (dl/g) of fiber 
               
               
                 Toughness (J/m 3 ) 
                 79 
                 80 
                 86 
                 87 
                 86 
               
               
                 of fiber 
               
               
                 Young&#39;s modulus (g/de) 
                 85 
                 84 
                 79 
                 78 
                 82 
               
               
                 at 1% elongation 
               
               
                 Young&#39;s modulus (g/de) 
                 47.0 
                 46.6 
                 26.8 
                 26.3 
                 26.0 
               
               
                 at 2% elongation 
               
               
                 Tensile strength 
                 9.1 
                 9.2 
                 9.25 
                 9.3 
                 9.35 
               
               
                 (g/de) of fiber 
               
               
                 Breaking elongation 
                 16.5 
                 17 
                 18.7 
                 19.0 
                 18.5 
               
               
                 (%) of fiber 
               
               
                 Melting heat capacity 
                 47.6 
                 48.6 
                 49.5 
                 51 
                 52.5 
               
               
                 (ΔH) of fiber 
               
               
                 Dry shrinkage (%) 
                 5.2 
                 5.3 
                 2.8 
                 4.0 
                 5.3 
               
               
                 Filament fineness (DPF) 
                 3.82 
                 3.23 
                 2.92 
                 4.61 
                 4.17 
               
               
                 Total fineness (de) 
                 420 
                 420 
                 420 
                 600 
                 600 
               
               
                 Filament count 
                 110 
                 130 
                 144 
                 130 
                 144 
               
               
                 Weave density 
                 49 × 49 
                 49 × 49 
                 49 × 49 
                 43 × 43 
                 43 × 43 
               
               
                 (warp × weft) 
               
               
                 Weaving type 
                 Plain 
                 Plain 
                 Plain 
                 Plain 
                 Plain 
               
               
                   
                 weaving 
                 weaving 
                 weaving 
                 weaving 
                 weaving 
               
               
                 Vulcanization 
                 180 
                 185 
                 190 
                 185 
                 190 
               
               
                 temperature (° C.) 
               
               
                 Rubber component 
                 Liquid 
                 Liquid 
                 Liquid 
                 Liquid 
                 Liquid 
               
               
                   
                 silicone 
                 silicone 
                 silicone 
                 silicone 
                 silicone 
               
               
                 Rubber coating 
                 25 
                 25 
                 25 
                 25 
                 25 
               
               
                 weight (g/m 2 ) 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0093]    The polyester fabrics prepared in Examples 1 to 5 were measured in regard to properties according to the following methods. The measurement results are presented in Table 2. 
         [0094]    (a) Thickness 
         [0095]    The uncoated polyester fabrics before the coating process and the rubber-coated polyester fabrics were measured in regard to thickness according to the ASTM D 1777 procedure. 
         [0096]    (b) Thermal Resistance Constant 
         [0097]    The uncoated polyester fabric before the rubber-coating process and the rubber-coated polyester fabric were cut into test specimens in dimension of 50 mm×50 mm. Each of the specimens was placed in a hot rod tester illustrated in  FIG. 2 . In the hot rod tester, the hot rod (steel, 10 mm diameter, 82 mm long, 50 g weight, thermal conductivity: 55 W/m·K) was heated up to 450 to 600° C. at a rate of 20° C./min and placed above the specimen at a distance “d” of about 76 mm. From above the specimen, the hot rod was dropped in free fall to measure the amount of time “t” (sec) taken for the hot rod to completely pass through the specimen from the point of contact with the specimen. Then the thermal resistance constant was determined as defined by the following calculation formula 1. 
         [0098]      FIG. 3  is a retention time “t” (sec) taken for the hot rod to completely pass through the specimen from the point of contact with the specimen against the hot rod temperature for the uncoated polyester fabric of Example 1. In the same manner, the retention time of the hot rod during free fall was measured for each of the other polyester fabrics to calculate the thermal resistance constant according to the calculation formula 1. 
         [0099]    This measurement procedure was repeatedly carried out 10 times for each polyester fabric to calculate the average thermal resistance constant, which is presented in Table 2. 
         [0000]      Thermal resistance constant( X )=( T×t )/(600 ×D )   [Calculation Formula 1]
 
         [0100]    In the calculation formula 1, T is the temperature of a hot rod during free fall in the range of 350 to 750° C.; t is the amount of time (sec) taken for the hot rod to pass through the polyester fabric from a point of contact with the polyester fabric; and D is the thickness (mm) of the polyester fabric, where D for a coated fabric is the thickness of the fabric including a coating layer. 
         [0101]    (c) Toughness 
         [0102]    The toughness (J/m 3 ) of the fabric was determined according to the following calculation formula 2: 
         [0000]      Toughness(work of rupture)=∫ 0   strain    F·dl    [Calculation Formula 2]
 
         [0103]    In the calculation formula 2, F denotes the load applied when the length of the polyester fiber or fabric is increased by dl; and dl is the increment of the length of the polyester fiber or fabric. 
         [0104]    The toughness of the fabric was measured for the uncoated fabric before the coating process. 
         [0105]    (d) Tear Strength 
         [0106]    Test specimens in dimensions of 75 mm×200 mm were cut out of the uncoated fabric before the coating process and the coated fabric after the coating process. The upper and lower ends of each specimen were gripped between left and right spaces of the upper and lower jaw faces, respectively, in a testing machine according to the ASTM D 2261 TONGUE procedure. Based on the distance between the jaw faces, the jaw faces moved apart at a tearing rate of 300 mm/min with the gap between the jaw faces increasing at 76 mm/min to measure the tear strength of the airbag fabric. 
         [0107]    (e) Tensile Strength and Breaking Elongation 
         [0108]    The uncoated fabric before the coating process was cut into a test specimen, which was gripped in the lower stationary clamp of a tensile testing machine according to the ASTM D 5034 method, while the upper clamp was moved upward, to measure the tensile strength T 1  and the breaking elongation when the airbag fabric specimen was ruptured. 
         [0109]    (f) Warp and Weft Shrinkages 
         [0110]    The fabric was measured in regard to warp and weft shrinkages according to the ASTM D 1776 method. In the procedure, the uncoated fabric before the coating process was cut into a test specimen. Lines marking a 20 cm of length in the warp and weft directions were made in the specimen fabric before shrinkage. After one-hour heat treatment in a chamber at 149° C., the lengths of the mark lines of the shrunk specimen fabric were measured to determine the warp and weft shrinkages as follows: 
         [0000]    
       
         
           
             
               
                 
                   ( 
                   
                     length 
                      
                     
                         
                     
                      
                     before 
                      
                     
                         
                     
                      
                     shrinkage 
                   
                   ) 
                 
                 - 
                 
                   ( 
                   
                     length 
                      
                     
                         
                     
                      
                     after 
                      
                     
                         
                     
                      
                     shrinkage 
                   
                   ) 
                 
               
               
                 ( 
                 
                   length 
                    
                   
                       
                   
                    
                   before 
                    
                   
                       
                   
                    
                   shrinkage 
                 
                 ) 
               
             
             × 
             100 
              
             % 
           
         
       
     
         [0111]    (g) Stiffness 
         [0112]    The uncoated fabric before the coating process was evaluated in regard to stiffness according to the ASTM D 4032 procedure (circular bend test method) using a stiffness testing machine. The stiffness testing adopted the cantilever method, where the stiffing testing machine used a test stand declined at a predetermined angle for bending the fabric to measure the length of the fabric after bending. 
         [0113]    (h) Air Permeability 
         [0114]    According to the ASTM D 737 method, the uncoated fabric before the coating process was kept under conditions of 20° C. and 65% RH for one hour or longer. The static air permeability was determined as the volume of air passing through the circular cross-section 38 cm 2  in size, where the air pressure ΔP was 125 pa or 500 pa. 
         [0115]    Further, the dynamic air permeability of the uncoated fabric was measured using a dynamic air permeability tester (TEXTEST FX 3350) according to the ASTM D 6476. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Examples 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Div. 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 4 
                 5 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Toughness (kJ/m 3 ) of fabric 
                 3.75 
                 3.83 
                 3.92 
                 5.4 
                 5.6 
               
               
                 Tear strength (kgf)/uncoated fabric 
                 19 
                 19 
                 20 
                 26 
                 26 
               
               
                 Tear strength (kgf)/coated fabric 
                 36 
                 37 
                 38 
                 38 
                 40 
               
               
                 Tensile strength (kgf/inch) of fabric 
                 227 
                 230 
                 234 
                 297 
                 305 
               
               
                 Breaking elongation (%) of fabric 
                 37 
                 37 
                 39 
                 38 
                 40 
               
               
                 Stiffness (kgf) 
                 0.40 
                 0.40 
                 0.35 
                 1.00 
                 0.90 
               
               
                 Thickness (mm)/uncoated fabric 
                 0.262 
                 0.262 
                 0.262 
                 0.325 
                 0.325 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/uncoated 
                 1.30 
                 1.30 
                 1.32 
                 2.67 
                 2.69 
               
               
                 (at 450° C., Hot Rod) 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/uncoated 
                 1.11 
                 1.11 
                 1.12 
                 1.51 
                 1.53 
               
               
                 (at 600° C., Hot Rod) 
               
               
                 Thickness (mm)/coated fabric 
                 0.268 
                 0.268 
                 0.268 
                 0.332 
                 0.332 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/coated 
                 6.22 
                 6.23 
                 6.22 
                 10.8 
                 10.9 
               
               
                 (at 450° C., Hot Rod) 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/coated 
                 5.6 
                 5.6 
                 5.6 
                 9.7 
                 9.7 
               
               
                 (at 600° C., Hot Rod) 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Shrinkage (%) 
                 Warp 
                 0.5 
                 0.5 
                 0.4 
                 0.4 
                 0.5 
               
               
                   
                 Weft 
                 0.3 
                 0.3 
                 0.4 
                 0.3 
                 0.3 
               
               
                 Static air permeability 
                 ΔP = 125 pa 
                 1.0 
                 0.9 
                 0.8 
                 0.6 
                 0.6 
               
               
                 (cfm)/uncoated 
                 ΔP = 500 pa 
                 9.5 
                 9.3 
                 9.2 
                 5.4 
                 5.4 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Dynamic air permeability (mm/s)/ 
                 620 
                 610 
                 590 
                 450 
                 430 
               
               
                 uncoated 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1 TO 3 
       [0116]    The procedures were performed in the same manner as described in Examples 1 to 5, excepting that polyester fabrics were prepared under the conditions given in the following table 3. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Comparative Examples 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Div. 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 PET content (mol %) 
                 100 
                 100 
                 100 
               
               
                   
                 Intrinsic viscosity 
                 0.85 
                 0.90 
                 0.95 
               
               
                   
                 (dl/g) of PET chip 
               
               
                   
                 CEG content (meq/kg) 
                 50 
                 47 
                 43 
               
               
                   
                 of PET chip 
               
               
                   
                 Spinning temperature 
                 301 
                 302 
                 305 
               
               
                   
                 (° C.) 
               
               
                   
                 Draw ratio 
                 4.95 
                 5.03 
                 5.10 
               
               
                   
                 Heat treatment 
                 198 
                 202 
                 205 
               
               
                   
                 temperature 
               
               
                   
                 (° C.) of fiber 
               
               
                   
                 Intrinsic viscosity 
                 0.61 
                 0.63 
                 0.65 
               
               
                   
                 (dl/g) of fiber 
               
               
                   
                 Toughness (J/m 3 ) 
                 59 
                 63 
                 67 
               
               
                   
                 of fiber 
               
               
                   
                 Young&#39;s modulus (g/de) 
                 115 
                 119 
                 125 
               
               
                   
                 at 1% elongation 
               
               
                   
                 Young&#39;s modulus (g/de) 
                 85 
                 91 
                 93 
               
               
                   
                 at 2% elongation 
               
               
                   
                 Tensile strength (g/de) 
                 6.9 
                 7.2 
                 7.5 
               
               
                   
                 of fiber 
               
               
                   
                 Breaking elongation (%) 
                 10 
                 11 
                 13 
               
               
                   
                 of fiber 
               
               
                   
                 Melting heat capacity 
                 30.5 
                 32.1 
                 32.5 
               
               
                   
                 (ΔH) of fiber 
               
               
                   
                 Dry shrinkage (%) 
                 15.5 
                 15 
                 13.7 
               
               
                   
                 Filament fineness (DPF) 
                 6.18 
                 6.18 
                 6.18 
               
               
                   
                 Total fineness (de) 
                 420 
                 420 
                 420 
               
               
                   
                 Filament count 
                 68 
                 68 
                 68 
               
               
                   
                 Weave density 
                 49 × 49 
                 49 × 49 
                 49 × 49 
               
               
                   
                 (warp × weft) 
               
               
                   
                 Weaving type 
                 Plain 
                 Plain 
                 Plain 
               
               
                   
                   
                 weaving 
                 weaving 
                 weaving 
               
               
                   
                 Vulcanization 
                 180 
                 185 
                 190 
               
               
                   
                 temperature (° C.) 
               
               
                   
                 Rubber component 
                 Liquid 
                 Liquid 
                 Liquid 
               
               
                   
                   
                 silicone 
                 silicone 
                 silicone 
               
               
                   
                 Rubber coating 
                 25 
                 25 
                 25 
               
               
                   
                 weight (g/m 2 ) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0117]    The properties of the polyester fabrics prepared in Comparative Examples 1 to 3 are presented in the following table 4. In this regard,  FIG. 4  shows a graph plotting the amount of time taken for a hot rod to pass through the uncoated polyester fabric of Comparative Example 1 against the hot rod temperature. The thermal resistance constant for each of the polyester fabrics of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 was calculated as described above. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Comparative Examples 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Div. 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Toughness (kJ/m 3 ) of fabric 
                 2.4 
                 2.5 
                 2.7 
               
               
                 Tear strength (kgf)/uncoated fabric 
                 13 
                 14 
                 15 
               
               
                 Tear strength (kgf)/coated fabric 
                 21 
                 23 
                 23 
               
               
                 Tensile strength (kgf/inch) of fabric 
                 183 
                 190 
                 195 
               
               
                 Breaking elongation (%) of fabric 
                 18 
                 20 
                 20 
               
               
                 Stiffness (kgf) 
                 1.8 
                 1.8 
                 1.8 
               
               
                 Thickness (mm)/uncoated fabric 
                 0.265 
                 0.265 
                 0.265 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/uncoated 
                 0.92 
                 0.95 
                 0.95 
               
               
                 (at 450° C., Hot Rod) 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/uncoated 
                 0.82 
                 0.84 
                 0.84 
               
               
                 (at 600° C., Hot Rod) 
               
               
                 Thickness (mm)/coated fabric 
                 0.271 
                 0.271 
                 0.271 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/coated 
                 4.83 
                 4.84 
                 4.85 
               
               
                 (at 450° C., Hot Rod) 
               
               
                 Thermal resistance constant/coated 
                 4.35 
                 4.35 
                 4.35 
               
               
                 (at 600° C., Hot Rod) 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Shrinkage (%) 
                 Warp 
                 1.3 
                 1.3 
                 1.2 
               
               
                   
                 Weft 
                 1.2 
                 1.0 
                 0.9 
               
               
                 Static air 
                 ΔP = 125 pa 
                 2.5 
                 2.4 
                 2.4 
               
               
                 permeability 
                 ΔP = 500 pa 
                 13.8 
                 13.7 
                 13.6 
               
               
                 (cfm)/uncoated 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Dynamic air permeability 
                 1,950 
                 1,920 
                 1,910 
               
               
                 (mm/s)/uncoated 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0118]    As shown in Tables 2 and 4, relative to the airbag fabrics of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 using the conventional polyester fiber, the polyester fabrics of Examples 1 to 5 using a low-modulus polyester fiber with high strength and high elongation to have a specific range of thermal resistance constant can exhibit good mechanical properties and enhanced properties, such as shrinkage, stiffness, and air permeability. 
         [0119]    More specifically, the polyester fabrics of Examples 1 to 5 have a thermal resistance constant of 1.3 to 2.69 for an uncoated fabric when the actual temperature of the hot rod is 450° C.; and a thermal resistance constant of 1.11 to 1.53 for an uncoated fabric when the actual temperature of the hot rod is 600° C., thereby acquiring very good properties, such as shrinkage of 0.3 to 0.5%, toughness of 3.75 to 5.6 kJ/m 3 , tear strength of 19 to 26 kgf for an uncoated fabric, tensile strength of 227 to 305 kgf/inch, and stiffness of 0.35 to 1.0 kgf. It is therefore concluded that the polyester fabric of the present invention using a high-strength, low-elongation polyester fiber with low Young&#39;s modulus to acquire a specific range of thermal resistance constant can have properties in optimum ranges for an airbag fabric and thus secure good folding and packing properties as well as high dimensional stability and good mechanical properties. 
         [0120]    Contrarily, the airbag fabrics of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 using the conventional high-modulus polyester fiber with low strength, low elongation, and high filament fineness have a thermal resistance constant of 0.92 to 1.16 for an uncoated fabric when the actual temperature of the hot rod is 450° C.; and a thermal resistance constant of 0.82 to 0.93 for an uncoated fabric when the actual temperature of the hot rod is 600° C., resulting in drastic deterioration in mechanical properties, such as shrinkage (0.9 to 1.3%), tensile strength (187 to 200 kgf/inch), and tear strength for an uncoated fabric (13 to 20 kgf). The airbag fabrics of Comparative Examples inferior in mechanical properties and dimensional stability to the airbag fabrics of Examples 1 to 5 are therefore considered unsuitable for use as airbag fabrics.