Abstract:
A fungicidal composition and method for the protection of vines against disease are provided. The composition which is applied to vines contains as active material a mixture of 1 part by weight of a monoester salt of a phosphorous acid of the formula ##STR1## in which R is an alkyl radical having 2 to 4 carbon atoms 
     Me is an alkali metal, alkaline earth, or aluminum atom 
     n is a whole number from 1 to 3 equal to the valence of Me 
     and from 0.05 to 8 parts of at least one contact fungicide selected from the group consisting of compounds having a base of copper, the metallic ethylene bisdithiocarbamates, and the derivatives of phthalimide.

Description:
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 6111,437, filed Nov. 7, 1990, and now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 250,937, filed Sep. 29, 1988, now abandoned, which is a division of Ser. No. 196,759, filed May 17, 1988, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,806,445, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 897,156, filed Aug. 18, 1986, and now abandoned, which is a division of Ser. No. 357,567, filed Mar. 12, 1982, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,698,334, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 133,143, filed Mar. 24, 1980 now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 869,234, filed Jan. 13, 1978 and now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to fungicidal compositions having a base of metallic alkyl phosphites for the protection of vines, in particular against mildew, as well as a process for the antifungal treatment of vines by means of these compositions. 
     Fungicidal compositions based on alkyl phosphites which can be employed, in particular, for protecting vines from mildew have been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,139,616 of Ducret et al. The active material of these compositions is described as having a systemic action, in contradistinction to previous antimildew fungicides; that is to say, the active material is carried from its point of application on the leaves to the other parts of the plant by the sap. 
     More thorough experimentation with these new fungicides on vines has shown that alkyl phosphites provide excellent protection of vine leaves against mildew, i.e. Plasmopora viticola, during the first months of vegetation, but that their fungicidal activity decreases substantially when the leaves become senescent. Thus, starting with the month of August, a progressive invasion is found by mildew on the old leaves, which are generally located at the base of the vine, while the rest of the foliage which has been more recently formed remains protected as a result of the systemic action of the alkyl phosphite based fungicide. 
     Certain conventional antimildew fungicides of the metallic ethylene-bis-dithiocarbamate type or derivatives of phthalimides exhibit good persistence on the vine but are not considered to have systemic activity. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     An object of the present invention is a fungicidal composition which provides persistent protection for plants against fungal infection, especially mildew. 
     Another object of the present invention is a fungicidal composition which provides protection for plants, especially vine plants, against fungal infection that is more lasting than that provided by previous alkyl phosphite antifungal compositions. 
     A further object of the present invention is a method of treating plants to provide protection against mildew which lasts for an entire season. 
     Still a further object of the present invention is a composition for treating plants wherein the amount of an active agent used is less than that required in prior compositions to provide a protection against fungal infection. 
     These and other objects are obtained by the invention disclosed below. 
     It has been found surprisingly, that excellent antimildew protection for the entire season is obtained when the vine is treated with mixtures of special alkyl phosphites and certain known antimildew agents having contact action, in which at least one of the active materials is present in an amount far less than that recommended when employed alone for the same use. 
     According to the invention, fungicidal compositions for the protection of vines, especially against mildew, contain as active material 
     a monoester of phosphorous acid of the formula ##STR2## in which: R is an alkyl radical containing form 2 to 4 carbon atoms, 
     Me is an alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, or aluminum atom, and 
     n is a whole number from 1 to 3, equal to the valence of Me, 
     in combination with 
     a contact fungicide selected from 
     (a) fungicidal compositions having a base of copper such as copper oxychloride, copper sulfate neutralized with slaked lime and cuprous oxide, 
     (b) metallic ethylene bisdithiocarbamates, such as maneb (manganese ethylene bisdithiocarbamate), mancozeb (manganese-zinc ethylene bis-dithiocarbamate), and 
     (c) phthalimide type fungicides, such as captafol or N-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylthio)-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide and folpel, or folpet, or N-(trichloromethylthio)phthalimide, in which at least one of the active fungicidal materials is present in the mixture in an amount substantially less than that in which it is currently used by itself for the same purpose. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     More precisely, the compositions of the invention which contain a mixture of at least one salt of a monoester of phosphorous acid of the above formula and at least one contact fungicide are effective antifungal agentswhen applied in an amount in which the individual constituents are present in amounts of about 15% to 75% of the doses recommended for use when the constituents are applied by themselves. The relative proportions of each of the components of the composition of the invention are such that the mixtures have remarkable and unexpected synergistic characteristics. 
     Desirably, the instant compositions are applied by spraying and compositions useful for spraying including compositions containing an agriculturally acceptable carrier are included among the compositions of the invention. 
     Particularly, significant and interesting results have been obtained in thecase of mixtures containing 0.05 to 8 parts of contact fungicides to 1 partof alkyl phosphite. These mixtures, applied by leaf spraying, contain generally from 50 to 400 g.hl. of alkyl phosphite and from 20 to 400 g./hl. of contact fungicide. 
     Among the particularly preferred compositions are those which comprise calcium ethyl phosphite and a contact fungicide selected from folpel, copper oxychloride, Bordeaux mixture, mancozeb or captafol; the preferred ratios by weight of calcium ethyl phosphite to contact fungicide in such compositions are approximately 1:0.5, 1:0.8, 1:0.8, 1:0.6 and 1:0.33, respectively. Also preferred are compositions comprising aluminum ethyl phosphite and folpel, preferably in a ratio by weight of about 1:0.5. 
     The above-mentioned compositions are useful for the treatment of vines against fungus infection, for example, mildew. 
     The following examples illustrate the synergistic behavior of the fungicidal mixtures in accordance with the invention, however, the examples are not to be construed as limiting the invention in any manner. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Several series of 10 vine stocks (Gamay variety) were subjected, from the spring until the beginning of August with watering in a very fine spray regularly, so as to cause a heavy contamination with mildew. 
     The vines were treated 8 times form May 12 to August 12 at intervals of 12 days on the average with a dispersion of wettable powders or solution of soluble powders of active materials consisting either of alkyl phosphites alone or of contact fungicides alone or else mixtures, formed just prior to use, of these two types of components. The spraying was effected by means of sprayers with deliveries of the order of 800 L/h. 
     The development of the attack of mildew on the foliage was checked and countings of the infested surface of the leaves were carried out regularly. 
     For each counting, the percentage contamination of the surface of the treated leaves is evaluated and referred to the percentage contamination of the surface of the control vines which were contaminated under the sameconditions. This contamination ratio is then expressed in percent. The difference between the number obtained and 100 is then determined in orderto express the percentage of protected surface. 
     The following results are given as of the end of September. This period is selected as being sufficiently late to be able to judge the intensity and persistence of the effectiveness close to the end of the season, at the time when the control vine are practically completely infested, but beforethe defoliation of the vines. It is, however, clear that under these conditions the surface of contamination foliage corresponds substantially to that of the foliage treated. 
     The doses are expressed in grams of active material/hectoliter, those concerning the copper-base compounds being expressed as metallic copper. 
     The active materials appearing in the examples are the following: 
     copper oxychloride, applied as a wettable powder, 50% copper, 
     Bordeaux mixture having a base of copper sulfate with 20% copper, neutralized with slaked lime, 
     maneb: manganese ethylene bisdithiocarbamate, applied as a wettable powder with 80% active substance, 
     mancozeb: manganese-zinc ethylene bisdithiocarbamate (2.5%) as wettable powder with 8% active material, 
     captafol: N-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylthio)-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide, as wettable powder, 80% active material, 
     folpel or folpet: N-(trichloromethylthio)phthalimide, applied as wettable powder of 50% active material. 
     The synergism is evaluated on basis of these results by way of comparison between the protected surface Sm obtained with the mixture and the sum of the protected surfaces Sp and Sc obtained with the alkyl phosphite and thecontact fungicide respectively, taken separately. 
     If the value Sm is greater than this sum, the effect is superior to what could be theoretically expected from the action of the mixture if the properties were simply additive; there is thus synergism. 
     Finally, in most cases, the action of the known fungicidal compound, used in its recommended dose, is indicated by way of memorandum at the top of each table. In order to make this synergism clearer, the sum Sp+Sc is indicated between parenthesis after the value Sm. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________MIXTURES WITH SODIUM ETHYL PHOSPHITEUsed As Soluble Powder With 80% Active Substance                   % on September 26 ofSodium ethyl-     Contact Fungicide                   protected surface ofphosphite g./hl.     g./hl.        leaves treated______________________________________250       copper oxycholoride                   Sp 4--         80           Sc 10250        80           Sm 60 (Sp + Sc = 14)     maneb--        280 (Recom. dose)                   54     for use250       --            Sp 4--        125           Sc 36250       125           Sm 46 (Sp + Sc = 40)     captafol     160 (Recom. dose)                   70     for use250       --            Sp 4--         50           Sc 30250        50           Sm 55 (Sp + Sc = 34)     folpel     150 (Recom. dose)                   54     for use250       --            Sp 4--        100           Sc 25250       100           Sm 58 (Sp + Sc = 29)______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________MIXTURES HAVINGA BASE OF ALUMINUM ETHYL PHOSPHITEUsed As Wettable Powder With 80% Active Material                    % on September 26 ofAluminum ethyl-      Contact Fungicide                    protected surface ofphosphite g./hl.      g./hl.        leaves treated______________________________________      copper oxycholoride--         500 (Recom. dose)                    90      for use250        --            Sp 5--         120           Sp 12250        120           Sm 60 (Sp + Sc = 17)      maneb--         280 (Recom. dose)                    54      for use200        --            Sp 4--         200           Sc 44200        200           Sm 56 (Sp + Sc = 48)      captafol--         160 (Recom. dose)                    70      for use250        --            Sp 5--          50           Sc 30250         50           Sm 50 (Sp + Sc = 35)      folpel--         150 (Recom. dose)                    54      for use250        --            Sp 5--         100           Sc 25250        100           Sm 56 (Sp + Sc = 30)______________________________________ 
    
     Moreover, during the course of these tests, there could be noted the excellent activity of a mixture of aluminum ethyl phosphite and folpel against excoriosis (Phomopsis viticola), blockrot (Guignardia bidwelli), brenner (Pseudopeziza tracheifila) as well as the retarding action on oidium (Uncinula necator). 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________MIXTURES HAVINGA BASE OF MAGNESIUM ISOPROPYL PHOSPHITEUsed As A Soluble Powder With 50% Active MaterialMagnesium iso-           % on September 26 ofpropyl phosphite      Contact Fungicide                    protected surface ofg./hl.     g./hl.        leaves treated______________________________________      copper oxycholoride--         500 (Recom. dose)                    90      for use250        --            Sp 4--         120           Sc 12250        120           Sm 50 (Sp + Sc = 16)      maneb--         280 (Recom. dose)                    54      for use200        --            Sp 4--         200           Sc 44200        200           Sm 56 (Sp + SC = 48)250        --            Sp 4--         125           Sp 36250        125           Sm 44 (Sp + Sc = 40)      captafol--         160 (Recom. dose)                    70      for use250        --            Sp 4--          50           Sc 30250         50           Sm 60 (Sp + Sc = 34)      folpel--         150           54250        --            Sp 4--         100           Sc 25250        100           Sm 50 (Sp + Sc =  29)______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 4 
     
                       TABLE 4______________________________________MIXTURES HAVINGA BASE OF CALCIUM ISOPROPYL PHOSPHITEUsed As Soluble Powder With 80% Active MaterialCalcium iso-             % on September 26 ofpropyl phosphite      Contact Fungicide                    protected surface ofg./hl.     g./hl.        leaves treated______________________________________      maneb--         280 (Recom. dose)                    54      for use250        --            Sp 4--         125           Sp 36250        125           Sm 46 (Sp + Sc = 40)      folpel--         150           54250        --            Sp 4--         100           Sc 25250        100           Sm 54 (Sp + Sc = 29)______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 5 
     
                       TABLE 5______________________________________MIXTURES WITH ALUMINUM ISOPROPYL PHOSPHITEUsed As Wettable Powder With 80% Active MaterialAluminum iso-            % on September 26propyl phosphite      Contact Fungicide                    of protected surface ofg./hl.     g./hl.        leaves treated______________________________________      copper oxychloride--         500 (Recom. dose)                    90      for use250        --            Sp 4--         120           Sc 12250        120           Sm 50 (Sp + Sc = 16)      maneb--         280 (Recom. dose)                    54      for use200        --            Sp 4--         200           Sc 34200        200           Sm 54 (Sp + Sc = 38)      captafol--         160 (Recom. dose)                    70      for use250        --            Sp 4--          50           Sc 30250         50           Sm 50 (Sp + Sc = 34)      folpel--         150 (Recom. dose)                    54      for use250        --            Sp 4--         100           Sc 25250        100           Sm 50 (Sp + Sc = 29)______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Tests under conditions of treatment very close to those described in Example 1 were carried out in another year with preformulated mixtures having a base of aluminum ethyl phosphite and mancozeb, each of the components being used in doses far less than the normal doses of use. The results, expressed as previously, are set forth in Table 6: 
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________MIXTURES WITH ALUMINUM ETHYL PHOSPHITEAluminum                % on September 27 ofethyl-    Contact Fungicide                   protected surface referredphosphite g./hl.     g./hl.        to the surface treated______________________________________     mancozeb--        280 (Recom. dose)                   85     for use150       --            Sp 22--         90           Sc 64150        90           Sm 96 (Sp + Sc = 86)175       --            Sp 25--        100           Sc 65175       100           Sm 96 (Sp + Sc = 90)     cupric oxychloride--         75           Sp 34150       --            Sc 21150        75           Sm 79 (Sp + Sc = 55)     100           Sp 45200       --            Sc 32200       100           Sm 87 (Sp + Sc = 77)     Bordeaux mixture     with 20% metallic     copper--         75           Sp 34150       --            Sc 21150        75           Sm 93 (Sp + Sc = 55)     cuprous oxide--         75           Sp 34150       --            Sc 21150        75           Sm 87 (Sp + Sc =  55)______________________________________ 
    
     Excellent protection of the vine up to the end of the season was obtained by applying to it, either in pre-prepared mixture or in mixture formed on the spot, compositions having a base of the above mixtures associated withanother contact fungicide. This applies in particular to compositions containing: 
     from 80 to 150 /g./hl. of aluminum ethyl phosphite 
     from 40 to 60 g./hl. of folpel 
     from 60 to 80 g./hl. of mancozeb 
     from 130 to 240 g./hl of copper. 
     Similar results are obtained when the alkyl phosphites tested are replaced in the mixtures by the following compounds: 
     magnesium ethyl phosphite 
     magnesium isobutyl phosphite 
     magnesium sec.butyl phosphite 
     calcium isobutyl phosphite 
     aluminum N-butyl phosphite 
     aluminum sec.butyl phosphite 
     aluminum isobutyl phosphite. 
     EXAMPLE 7 
     Several series of 10 vine-stocks (Gamay variety) were subjected from springto the start of August, to regular watering by very fine spray, so as to cause severe combination with mildew (plasmopora viticola). 
     The vine-stocks were treated 9 times, from May 30th to August 22nd at average intervals of 11 days, with dispersions of wettable powders or solutions of soluble powders of active materials consisting either solely of calcium ethyl phosphite or solely of contact fungicides or of mixtures,prepared just before use, of these two types of constituents. Spraying was carried out by means of sprayers delivering of the order of 800 l/ hectare. The development of the mildew attack on the foliage was observed and counts of the invaded surface of the leaves were made regularly. 
     For each count are estimated over the total surface of the leaves, the percentage of contamination of the surface of the treated leaves Sx and that of the surface of the control vine-stocks S T , the latter having been contaminated under the same conditions. Thereafter, a coefficient of efficacy is calculated using the formula ##EQU1##The results given in the Tables 7 and 8 are given for a count at the beginning of October. 
     This period is selected as being sufficiently late to be able to judge the intensity and persistence of the effectiveness of the various treatments close to the end of the season, at a time when the controls are practically completely infested, but before the defoliation of the vines. 
     The doses are expressed in g. of active material/hl., those relating to thecompounds based on copper being expressed in terms of copper metal. 
     The active materials (a.m.) used are the following: calcium ethyl phosphiteas a wettable powder having the following composition by weight: 
     
         ______________________________________calcium ethyl phosphite 80%calcium lignosulphate    4%sodium isopropylnaphthalene sulphonate                    4%kaolin                  12%______________________________________ 
    
     folpet: N-(trichloromethylthio)phthalimide as a wettable powder containing 50% by weight of active material 
     copper oxychloride as a wettable powder containing 50% by weight of copper 
     Bordeaux mixture based on copper sulphate neutralized with calcium hydroxide, and containing 20% by weight of copper. 
     The synergism is evaluated on the basis of these results by comparison between the coefficient of efficacy Sm obtained with the mixture and the sum of the coefficients of efficacy Sp and Sc obtained with the ethylphosphite and the contact fungicide used separately. 
     If the value Sm is greater than the sum, Sp+Sc, the effect is superior to what could be theoretically expected from the action of the mixture if theproperties of the components were simply additive; there is thus synergism.In order to make this synergism clearer, the sum Sp+Sc is indicated betweenparenthesis after the value Sm. 
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________MIXTURES WITH CALCIUM ETHYL PHOSPHITECalciumethyl phos-    Contact fungicide                   Coefficient of efficacyphite g.a.m.    g.a.m.         on 3rd October______________________________________    folpel150      --             Sp 18--        75            Sc 37150       75            Sm 86 (Sp + Sc = 55)    copper oxychloride150      --             Sp 18--       120            Sc 43150      120            Sm 71 (Sp + Sc = 61)    Bordeaux mixture150      --             Sp 18--       120            Sc 41150      120            Sm 72 (Sp + Sc = 59)______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 8 
     Another year a field trial is carried out using the same procedure as that described in Example 7, with the following particular conditions: 
     the vine-stocks are treated 8 times from May 31 up to August 9, at an average interval of 10 days: 
     the active materials tested are as follows: 
     
         ______________________________________calcium ethyl phosphite 80%calcium lignosulphate    4%sodium isopropylnaphthalene sulphonate                    4%kaolin                  12%______________________________________ 
    
     mancozeb: manganese and zinc (2.5% w/w) ethylene-bisdithiocarbamate as a wettable powder containing 80% w/w of active ingredient captafol: N-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylthio)-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide as a suspension concentrate containing 480 g./l. of active material. 
     The results are expressed in Table 8 in the same way as in Example 7. 
     
                       TABLE 8______________________________________MIXTURES WITH CALCIUM ETHYL PHOSPHITECalcium    Contact fungicide                    Coefficient of efficacyethyl phosphite      g.a.m./hl.    on October 1______________________________________      mancozeb150        --            Sp 9--         90            Sc 58150        90            Sm 83 (Sp + Sc = 67)      captafol150        --            Sp 9--         50            Sc 62150        50            Sm 86 (Sp + Sc = 71)______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 9 
     The test described below illustrates the synergistic behavior of a fungicidal composition according to the invention comprising aluminum ethyl phosphite and folpel in a ratio of 1:0.5 by weight. 
     Several series of 10 vine-stocks (Gamay variety) were subjected, from spring to the start of August, to regular watering by very fine spray, so as to cause severe contamination with mildew (plasmopara viticola). 
     The vine-stocks were treated 8 times from May 31 to August 9, at average intervals of 10 days, with dispersions of wettable powders or solutions ofsoluble powders of active materials consisting either solely of alkyl phosphite of solely of contact fungicide or of a mixture, prepared just before use, of these two constituents. Spraying was carried out by means of sprayers delivering of the order of 800 l/hectare. The development of the mildew attack was observed and counts of the invaded surface were maderegularly. 
     For each count are estimated over the total surface of the leaves the percentage of contamination of the surface of the treated leaves Sx and that of the surface of the control vine-stocks S T , the latter having been contaminated under the same conditions. Thereafter a coefficient of efficacy is calculated using the formula ##EQU2##The results in Table 9 given for a count at the end of September. 
     This period is selected as being sufficiently late to be able to judge the intensity and persistence of the effectiveness of the various treatments close to the end of the season, at a time when the controls are practically completely infested, but before the defoliation of the vines. 
     The dose are expressed in grams of active material/hectoliter. The contact fungicide appearing in the Test is folpel or folpet, i.e. N-(trichloromethylthio)phthalimide, applied as a wettable powder containing 50% w/w active material. 
     The synergistic effect is evaluated on the basis of these results by comparison of the coefficient of efficacy Sm obtained with the mixture andthe sum of the coefficients of efficacy Sp and Sc obtained with the alkyl phosphite and the contact fungicide respectively, taken separately. 
     If the value Sm is greater than this sum, the effect is superior to what could theoretically be expected from the action of the mixture if the properties were simply additive; there is thus synergism. In order to makethis synergism clearer, the sum Sp+Sc is indicated in parenthesis after thevalue Sm. 
     
                       TABLE 9______________________________________MIXTURES BASED ON ALUMINUM ETHYL PHOSPHITE       AluminumRatio contact       ethyl-              Coefficient offungicide/alkyl       phosphite Folpel    efficacy on 26thphosphite   g./hl.    g./hl.    September______________________________________0.5/1       200       --        Sp 4       --        100       Sc 25       200       100       Sm 56                           (Sp + Sc = 29)______________________________________ 
    
     All these examples clearly show that: 
     On the one hand, the protective action of the alkyl phosphites alone on theaged leaves, that is to say the treated foliage, is insufficient due to a lack of permanence. These compounds therefore cannot be used by themselvesto assure protection of the treated foliage up to the end of the season. 
     On the other hand, the contact fungicides in their recommended dose assure a certain amount of protection which may be excellent, as in the case of the copper-base compounds. However, as soon as the dosed are substantiallydecreased, the action of the products, still considered residual, becomes very greatly reduced, to the point of making them ineffective in these doses. 
     Knowing thus that the alkyl phosphites assure good protection at the start of the season and the contact fungicides good protection for the rest of the season, one could have expected an action which was merely complementary in time. It is completely surprising that at the end of the season, the protection of foliage treated with compositions of the invention has been found to be not only superior to that of the contact fungicides used by themselves, but far superior to the theoretical sum of the protections which are obtained with each of the components taken individually in the same doses as in the mixture. 
     The synergism noted is observed for a given selection of alkyl phosphites with certain contact fungicides, preferably with compounds having a base of copper, mancozeb and folpel. 
     The fungicidal compositions in accordance with the invention, contain as active material, a mixture comprising from 0.5 to 8 and preferably from 0.1 to 2 parts by weight of contact fungicides per part of alkyl phosphite. The compositions are applied preferably by leaf spraying in an amount of 50 to 400 g./hl. of contact fungicide. 
     More precisely, the copper base mixtures contain 0.15 to 2 parts of metallic copper per part of alkyl phosphite. 
     The mixtures having a base of metallic ethylene bisdithiocarbamate contain from 0.2 to 2 parts of these fungicides per part of alkyl phosphite. 
     The mixtures having a base of phthalimide derivatives contain from 0.1 to 1.2 parts of these fungicides per part of alkyl phosphite. 
     The ternary mixtures, that is to say, mixtures containing two contact fungicides, contain by weight preferably from 0.25 to 0.75 part of phthalimide derivatives or 0.4 to 1 part of metal ethylene bisdithiocarbamate and 0.85 to 3 parts of metallic copper per part of ethyl phosphite. 
     For their use in practice, the mixtures in accordance with the invention are rarely used alone. Generally, they are part of formulations which, in most cases, include in addition to the active material of the invention, also a carrier or support and/or a surface-active agent. 
     The expression &#34;carrier&#34; or &#34;support&#34; within the meaning of the present specification refers to an organic or inorganic material, natural or synthetic, with which the active material is associated to facilitate its application to the plant, the seeds, or the soil, or its transportation orhandling. The support may be solid (clays, natural or synthetic silicates, resins, waxes, solid fertilizers) or liquid (water, alcohols, ketones, petroleum fractions, chlorinated hydrocarbons, liquified gases). 
     The surface-active may be an emulsifying, dispersing, or wetting agent, whether ionic or nonionic. Mention may be made, by way of example of saltsof polyacrylic acids, lignin-sulfonic acids, ethylene oxide condensates with fatty alcohols, fatty acids, or fatty amines. 
     The compositions in accordance with the invention can be prepared in the form of wettable powders, soluble powders, solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, emulsions, concentrates in suspension, and suspensions. 
     The wettable powders are customarily prepared in such a manner that they contain form 20 to 95% by weight of material and they customarily contain,in addition to a solid support, from 0 to 5% by weight of wetting agent, from 3 to 10% by weight of a dispersing agent, and, when necessary, from 0to 10% by weight of one of more stabilizers and/or other additives, such aspenetration agents, adhesives, or anti-clodding agents, coloring substances, etc. By way of example the composition of a wettable powder isgiven herewith: 
     
         ______________________________________active material      50%calcium lignosulfonate                5%(deflocculant)anionic wetting agent (alkaline                1%alkyl naphthalene sulfonate)anticlodding silica  5%kaolin (filler)      39%______________________________________ 
    
     The water soluble powders are obtained by mixing 20 to 95% by weight of active material, 0 to 10% of an anticlodding filler and 0 to 1% of a wetting agent, the balance consisting of a water-soluble filler, primarilya salt. 
     An example of the composition of a water soluble powder follows: 
     
         ______________________________________active material          80%anionic wetting agent (alkaline                    0.5%alkyl naphthalene sulfonate)anticlodding silica      4%sodium sulfate (soluble filler)                    15.5%______________________________________ 
    
     Aqueous dispersions and emulsions, for instance the compositions obtained by diluting with water a wettable powder or an emulsifiable concentrate inaccordance with the invention, are included within the general scope of thepresent invention. These emulsions may be of the water-in-oil type or of the oil-in-water type and they may have a thick consistency like that of mayonnaise.