assembleco/hyperdemocracy huggingface dataset:
WHO Withdrawal Act

Subjects: International Affairs, Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad, Foreign aid and international relief, International law and treaties, International organizations and cooperation, Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents, World health

Summary:  <p><b>WHO Withdrawal Act</b></p> <p>This bill requires the President to immediately withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) and prohibits using any federal funds to provide for U.S. participation in the WHO. </p> <p>The bill also repeals the 1948 act authorizing the United States to join the WHO.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 79

    To direct the President to withdraw the United States from the 
 Constitution of the World Health Organization, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Massie, 
and Mr. Rosendale) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
    To direct the President to withdraw the United States from the 
 Constitution of the World Health Organization, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``WHO Withdrawal Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF UNITED STATES FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF THE WORLD 
              HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) the President shall withdraw the United States from the 
        Constitution of the World Health Organization (62 Stat. 2679; 
        14 U.N.T.S 186); and
            (2) no funds available to any Federal department or agency 
        may used to provide for the participation of the United States 
        in the World Health Organization or any successor organization.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF THE ACT OF JUNE 14, 1948.

    The Act of June 14, 1948 (Public Law 806-43; 62 Stat. 441; 22 
U.S.C. 290 et seq.), providing for membership and participation by the 
United States in the World Health Organization and authorizing an 
appropriation therefor, is repealed.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Ending Mandates on Head Start Educators Act

Subjects: Health, Education

Summary:  <p><b>Ending Mandates on Head Start Educators Act</b></p> <p>This bill nullifies the rule titled <i>Vaccine and Mask Requirements to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start Programs</i>, which was issued by the Department of Health and Human Services on November 30, 2021. The rule requires that (1) all individuals two years of age and older wear face masks (subject to some exceptions) when participating in Head Start programs, and (2) Head Start staff and others with direct contact with children be vaccinated against COVID-19.</p> <p>The bill also prohibits the issuance of any substantially similar rule.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 794 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 794

 To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirement in Head Start 
                               Programs.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

 Mr. Joyce of Ohio (for himself, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Moolenaar, and 
 Mr. Rutherford) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirement in Head Start 
                               Programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Mandates on Head Start 
Educators Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COVID-19 VACCINE AND MASK REQUIREMENT IN HEAD 
              START PROGRAMS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule entitled ``Vaccine and 
Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start 
Programs'' published by the Department of Health and Human Services on 
November 30, 2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 68052), and may not promulgate any 
substantially similar rule.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Respect State Housing Laws Act

Subjects: Housing and Community Development, Landlord and tenant, Low- and moderate-income housing, Public housing

Summary:  <p><b>Respect State Housing Laws Act</b></p> <p>This bill eliminates a provision that requires a 30-day notice period before a landlord may begin eviction proceedings against a tenant in federally assisted or federally backed housing.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 802 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 802

 To amend the CARES Act to remove a requirement on lessors to provide 
               notice to vacate, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

Mr. Loudermilk (for himself, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Barr, Mr. Timmons, Mr. 
Duncan, Mr. Flood, and Mr. Norman) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To amend the CARES Act to remove a requirement on lessors to provide 
               notice to vacate, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respect State Housing Laws Act''.

SEC. 2. NOTICE.

    Section 4024 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9058) is amended by 
striking subsection (c).
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad Act

Subjects: International Affairs, Department of State, Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad, Executive agency funding and structure, Racial and ethnic relations

Summary:  <p><b>Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad Act</b></p> <p>This bill prohibits using federal funds for the Department of State's Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice. (The special representative's duties include leading the State Department's efforts to combat systemic racism and discrimination around the world.)</p> <p>The bill also prohibits using federal funds to implement the State Department's Equity Action Plan. (The plan outlines actions and metrics related to addressing issues of equity, including racial equity, in the State Department's foreign affairs mission.)</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 81

To prohibit funding to the Special Representative for Racial Equity and 
      Justice of the Department of State, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To prohibit funding to the Special Representative for Racial Equity and 
      Justice of the Department of State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    Beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
obligated or expended--
            (1) for the salary or expenses of the Special 
        Representative for Racial Equity and Justice of the Department 
        of State; or
            (2) to otherwise implement or carry out the Equity Action 
        Plan of the Department of State.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
District of Columbia Police Home Rule Act

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, District of Columbia, Intergovernmental relations, Law enforcement administration and funding, Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents, State and local government operations, War and emergency powers

Summary:  <p><b>District of Columbia Police Home Rule Act</b></p> <p>This bill restricts the authority of the President to assume control of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department upon determining there is an emergency that requires the department's use for federal purposes.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 810 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 810

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 
   of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the 
                         District of Columbia.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 
   of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Police Home 
Rule Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT TO ASSUME EMERGENCY CONTROL OF 
              POLICE OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Repeal of Authority.--The District of Columbia Home Rule Act is 
amended by striking section 740 (sec. 1-207.40, D.C. Official Code).
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 740.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Inflation Reduction Act of 2023

Subjects: Taxation

Summary:  <p> <strong>Inflation Reduction Act of 2023 </strong></p> <p>This bill repeals the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and rescinds any unobligated funds made available by such act.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 812 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 812

             To repeal the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

Mr. Ogles (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, 
 Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mrs. Luna, 
Mr. Donalds, Mr. Brecheen, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Rosendale, 
 Mr. Self, Mr. Roy, Mr. Crane, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Zinke, Ms. 
Hageman, Mr. Cloud, and Mr. Buck) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
  Committees on Energy and Commerce, Agriculture, Natural Resources, 
Financial Services, Science, Space, and Technology, Transportation and 
 Infrastructure, and Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
             To repeal the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inflation Reduction Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INFLATION REDUCTION ACT OF 2022.

    (a) In General.--Public Law 117-169 (commonly referred to as the 
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022) is repealed.
    (b) Rescissions.--The unobligated balances of any amounts made 
available under Public Law 117-169 are rescinded.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
RELIEVE Act

Subjects: Armed Forces and National Security, Health care costs and insurance, Health care coverage and access, Veterans' medical care, Veterans' pensions and compensation

Summary:  <p><b>Removing Extraneous Loopholes Insuring Every Veteran Emergency Act or the RELIEVE Act</b></p> <p>This bill expands eligibility for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reimbursement of emergency treatment for veterans who are treated in a non-VA facility. Specifically, the bill waives the requirement that a veteran must have received VA care within the 24-month period preceding the furnishing of emergency treatment if the veteran receives such emergency treatment within the 60-day period following their enrollment in the VA health care system.</p> <p>Additionally, the bill extends through December 28, 2031, higher rates for certain loan fees under the VA home loan program.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 815 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 815

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements 
 relating to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for 
   emergency treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care 
                    program, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

 Mrs. Rodgers of Washington (for herself, Mr. Bergman, and Mr. Pappas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements 
 relating to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for 
   emergency treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Removing Extraneous Loopholes 
Insuring Every Veteran Emergency Act'' or the ``RELIEVE Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR EMERGENCY 
              TREATMENT FURNISHED TO VETERANS.

    (a) Eligibility Requirements.--Section 1725(b)(2)(B) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting ``, unless such emergency 
treatment was furnished during the 60-day period following the date on 
which the veteran enrolled in the health care system specified in 
subparagraph (A), in which case no requirement for prior receipt of 
care shall apply'' before the period.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to emergency treatment furnished on or after the 
date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Protecting School Milk Choices Act of 2023

Subjects: Agriculture and Food

Summary:  <p><strong>Protecting School Milk Choices Act of 202</strong><b>3</b></p> <p>This bill revises requirements for milk provided by the National School Lunch Program of the Department of Agriculture.</p> <p>Currently, schools participating in the program may provide lactose-free and flavored and unflavored milk. Under the bill, these schools must provide students flavored and unflavored milk and maintain the discretion to offer lactose-free milk.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 819 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 819

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act with respect 
 to the types of milk offered under the school lunch program, and for 
                            other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

 Ms. Stefanik (for herself, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Miller-
    Meeks, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Williams of New York, Ms. Tenney, Mr. 
Langworthy, and Mr. Molinaro) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act with respect 
 to the types of milk offered under the school lunch program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting School Milk Choices Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. TYPES OF MILK OFFERED UNDER THE SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM.

    Section 9(a)(2)(A) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking clause (ii);
            (2) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
                            ``(ii) shall offer students flavored and 
                        unflavored fluid milk;
                            ``(iii) may offer students lactose-free 
                        fluid milk; and''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
TROOP Act

Subjects: Armed Forces and National Security


<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 828 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 828

 To direct the reinstatement of an individual involuntarily separated 
   from an Armed Force solely on the basis of refusing to receive a 
                     vaccination against COVID-19.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

Mr. Dunn of Florida (for himself, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Mills, Mr. 
  Ezell, Mr. Posey, Mr. Cloud, Mr. C. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mrs. 
 Harshbarger, Mr. Gimenez, and Mr. Buchanan) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To direct the reinstatement of an individual involuntarily separated 
   from an Armed Force solely on the basis of refusing to receive a 
                     vaccination against COVID-19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Troop Return Of Overdue Payment 
Act'' or the ``TROOP Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT AND BACK PAY FOR AN INDIVIDUAL INVOLUNTARILY 
              SEPARATED FROM AN ARMED FORCE SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF 
              REFUSING TO RECEIVE A VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19.

    (a) Reinstatement.--At the request of a covered individual, the 
Secretary concerned shall--
            (1) reinstate the covered individual as a member of the 
        Armed Force concerned, in the same rank and grade the covered 
        individual held at the time of separation from the Armed Force 
        concerned; and
            (2) include, in the computation of the retired or retainer 
        pay of such covered individual, the period between the 
        involuntary separation and the reinstatement of the covered 
        individual.
    (b) Back Pay.--A covered individual who was involuntarily 
discharged from an Armed Force and who makes a request under subsection 
(a) shall be entitled to back pay for the period between such 
separation and reinstatement of the covered individual.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``covered individual'' means an individual who 
        was involuntarily separated from an Armed Force solely on the 
        basis of the refusal of such individual to receive a 
        vaccination against COVID-19.
            (2) The term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, Civil actions and liability, Congressional oversight, Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation, Criminal justice information and records, Elections, voting, political campaign regulation, Fraud offenses and financial crimes, Government information and archives, Legal fees and court costs, Licensing and registrations, Motor vehicles, Postal service, State and local government operations, Voting rights

Summary:  <p>This bill repeals the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. The act established certain voter registration requirements for federal elections, such as the requirement for states to allow individuals to register to vote when they apply for a driver's license. </p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 83 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 83

         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT OF 1993.

    The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20501 et 
seq.) is repealed.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To redesignate Gravelly Point Park, located along the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park, and for other purposes.

Subjects: Public Lands and Natural Resources

Summary:  <p>This bill redesignates as the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park the Gravelly Point Park located along the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 836 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 836

To redesignate Gravelly Point Park, located along the George Washington 
  Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan 
                 Memorial Park, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

  Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Valadao, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. 
Buck, Mr. Carey, Mr. Babin, Mr. Obernolte, Mr. McClintock, Mrs. Kim of 
California, Mr. Mike Garcia of California, and Mr. Calvert) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To redesignate Gravelly Point Park, located along the George Washington 
  Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan 
                 Memorial Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    Gravelly Point Park, located along the George Washington Memorial 
Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, shall be redesignated as the 
``Nancy Reagan Memorial Park''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to Gravelly Point Park shall be deemed to 
be a reference to the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Sergeant Gary Beikirch Medal of Honor Act

Subjects: Armed Forces and National Security

Summary:  <p><b>Sergeant Gary Beikirch Medal of Honor Act</b></p> <p>This bill allows a surviving spouse of a Medal of Honor recipient to receive a special pension concurrently with dependency and indemnity compensation.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 841 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 841

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow a surviving spouse of a 
Medal of Honor recipient to receive a special pension concurrently with 
     dependency and indemnity compensation, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

   Mr. Morelle (for himself, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, and Mr. Carson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow a surviving spouse of a 
Medal of Honor recipient to receive a special pension concurrently with 
     dependency and indemnity compensation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sergeant Gary Beikirch Medal of 
Honor Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF MEDAL OF HONOR SPECIAL PENSION PROVISIONS TO 
              ALLOW CONCURRENT BENEFITS.

    Section 1562(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraph (C).
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To amend the Defense Base Act to exclude Guam.

Subjects: Labor and Employment

Summary:  <p>This bill excludes Guam from the application of the Defense Base Act (DBA). The DBA provides workers' compensation protection to civilian employees working on national defense projects outside the United States.</p> <p>Under current Department of Labor guidance, the DBA applies to U.S. citizens and lawful residents working on such projects in Guam.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 842 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 842

             To amend the Defense Base Act to exclude Guam.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

  Mr. Moylan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
             To amend the Defense Base Act to exclude Guam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INAPPLICABILITY OF DEFENSE BASE ACT TO GUAM.

    Subsection (b) of section 1 of the Defense Base Act (Chapter 357; 
55 Stat. 622; 42 U.S.C. 1651) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``the period at the end'' 
        and inserting ``and Guam;''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) the term `Territory or possession outside the 
        continental United States' does not include Guam.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Protect American Trade Secrets Act of 2023

Subjects: Crime and Law Enforcement, Foreign and international corporations, Jurisdiction and venue, Trade secrets and economic espionage

Summary:  <p><strong></strong><b>Protect American Trade Secrets Act of 2023 </b></p> <p>This bill explicitly grants extraterritorial jurisdiction over civil claims for conduct involving trade secret theft occurring outside the United States and impacting U.S. commerce, including conduct by an offender who is (1) not a U.S. person or lawful U.S. resident, or (2) a foreign organization. <br> </p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 844 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 844

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to allow an owner of a trade 
 secret redress of the theft of trade secrets extraterritorially, and 
                          for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

Mr. Obernolte (for himself, Mr. Steube, Mr. Pfluger, and Mr. Crawford) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to allow an owner of a trade 
 secret redress of the theft of trade secrets extraterritorially, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect American Trade Secrets Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REDRESS OF THEFT OF TRADE SECRETS EXTRATERRITORIALLY.

    Section 1836 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Applicability to Conduct Outside United States.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this section shall apply to 
conduct occurring outside the United States and impacting United States 
commerce, including conduct by an offender who is--
            ``(1) not a United States person or an alien lawfully 
        admitted for permanent residence into the United States; or
            ``(2) an organization which is created or organized under 
        the laws of a foreign government or which has its principal 
        place of business located outside of the United States.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, and for other purposes.

Subjects: Public Lands and Natural Resources, Congressional tributes, Nevada, Wilderness and natural areas, wildlife refuges, wild rivers, habitats

Summary:  <p>This bill designates the peak of Frenchman Mountain in Nevada as the Maude Frazier Mountain.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 848 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 848

 To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, 
                        and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MAUDE FRAZIER MOUNTAIN IN THE STATE OF 
              NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--The peak of Frenchman Mountain located at latitude 
3610'45" N, by longitude 11459'52" W in the State of Nevada shall be 
known and designated as ``Maude Frazier Mountain''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the peak referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ``Maude Frazier 
Mountain''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To require the Department of Defense to share best practices with, and offer training to, State and local first responders regarding how to most effectively aid victims who experience trauma-related injuries.

Subjects: Armed Forces and National Security

Summary:  <p>This bill requires the Department of Defense to ensure that it shares best practices with, and offers training to, state and local first responders regarding how to most effectively aid victims who experience trauma-related injuries.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 849 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 849

To require the Department of Defense to share best practices with, and 
 offer training to, State and local first responders regarding how to 
  most effectively aid victims who experience trauma-related injuries.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

    Mr. Torres of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To require the Department of Defense to share best practices with, and 
 offer training to, State and local first responders regarding how to 
  most effectively aid victims who experience trauma-related injuries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROVISION OF TRAINING AND INFORMATION 
              FOR FIRST RESPONDERS REGARDING AID FOR VICTIMS OF TRAUMA-
              RELATED INJURIES.

    The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of 
Defense shares best practices with, and offers training to, State and 
local first responders regarding how to most effectively aid victims 
who experience trauma-related injuries.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

Subjects: Law, District of Columbia, Federal district courts, Immigration status and procedures, Jurisdiction and venue

Summary:  <p>This bill grants exclusive jurisdiction to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia over (1) cases arising under immigration laws, or (2) claims by foreign nationals challenging an order of removal or another action authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act. </p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 85

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive 
 jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for 
                            other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive 
 jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OVER CASES ARISING UNDER THE IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws
    ``(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the district 
court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction 
over--
            ``(1) any case arising under the immigration laws (as such 
        term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.)); or
            ``(2) any claim brought by any foreign national challenging 
        an order of removal from the United States or any other action 
        authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
To direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on the efficacy of extreme risk protection orders on reducing gun violence, and for other purposes.

Subjects: Crime and Law Enforcement, Crime prevention, Firearms and explosives, Government studies and investigations, Violent crime

Summary:  <p>This bill directs the Bureau of Justice Assistance within the Department of Justice to study the efficacy of extreme risk protection orders on reducing gun violence. </p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 850 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 850

 To direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on the efficacy of 
extreme risk protection orders on reducing gun violence, and for other 
                               purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

    Mr. Torres of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on the efficacy of 
extreme risk protection orders on reducing gun violence, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY ON EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS.

    Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Attorney General, acting through the Director of the Bureau of 
Justice Assistance, shall conduct a study on the efficacy of extreme 
risk protection orders on reducing gun violence.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Iron Pipeline Review Act

Subjects: Crime and Law Enforcement


<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 851 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 851

 To direct the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to 
        report on firearms trafficking along the I-95 corridor.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

    Mr. Torres of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To direct the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to 
        report on firearms trafficking along the I-95 corridor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Iron Pipeline Review Act''.

SEC. 2. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES REPORT ON 
              FIREARMS TRAFFICKING ALONG THE I-95 CORRIDOR.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and annually thereafter, the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, in consultation with State and local 
law enforcement entities, and other agencies or stakeholders as 
determined appropriate by the Director, shall submit to the Committee 
on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
the Judiciary of the Senate a report on firearms trafficked along 
Interstate 95 that contains the following:
            (1) An analysis of the number of firearms trafficked along 
        Interstate 95, that contains the following:
                    (A) Firearms listed by the State of origin, and the 
                make and model of the firearm.
                    (B) An analysis of the effectiveness of counter 
                firearm trafficking measures.
                    (C) An analysis of specific local, State and 
                Federal laws that affect the number of firearms 
                trafficked.
                    (D) A description of any actions directed as a 
                result of the analysis conducted under this section.
            (2) Recommendations, as appropriate, for Federal, State and 
        local law enforcement entities to improve firearm trafficking 
        measures referred to in paragraph (1).
            (3) Proposals, as appropriate, for legislative actions and 
        funding needed to improve measures to counter firearm 
        trafficking.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Presidential Budget Accountability Act

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics


<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 857 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 857

  To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
  funds for travel by the President if the President's annual budget 
        submission to Congress is late, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2023

Mr. Carter of Georgia (for himself, Ms. Mace, and Mr. Cline) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
  funds for travel by the President if the President's annual budget 
        submission to Congress is late, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Presidential Budget Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR PRESIDENTIAL TRAVEL 
              EXPENSES IF PRESIDENT'S BUDGET IS LATE.

    Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) If the budget under subsection (a) is not submitted to 
Congress on or before the first Monday in February of a year, no 
Federal funds may be obligated or expended for the cost of travel by 
the President during the period beginning on the first Tuesday of 
February of such year and ending on the date the budget is submitted. 
For purposes of this subsection, the term `Federal funds' includes 
amounts made available for--
            ``(1) the expense allowance of the President under section 
        102 of title 3;
            ``(2) travel expenses of the President under section 103 of 
        title 3;
            ``(3) entertainment expenses of the President under section 
        105(d)(3) of title 3; and
            ``(4) subsistence expenses in connection with the travel of 
        the President in section 105(d)(4) of title 3.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>