assembleco/hyperdemocracy huggingface dataset:
Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, Congressional oversight, District of Columbia, Elections, voting, political campaign regulation, Immigration status and procedures, State and local government operations, Voting rights

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the council of the District of Columbia. The act allows noncitizens who meet residency and other requirements to vote in local elections in the district.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 24

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
   approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2023

 Mr. Comer (for himself, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Grothman, 
Ms. Mace, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Pfluger, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Fallon, 
 Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Norman, Mr. LaTurner, and Mr. Sessions) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
   approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-
640), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia on November 
21, 2022, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of 
the District of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 10, 2023.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022.

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, Congressional oversight, Criminal procedure and sentencing, District of Columbia, Due process and equal protection, State and local government operations, Violent crime

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022, enacted by the council of the District of Columbia (DC). The act makes a variety of changes to DC criminal laws, including by providing statutory definitions for various elements of criminal offenses, modifying sentencing guidelines and penalties, and expanding the right to a jury trial for certain misdemeanor crimes.</p>

<html><body><pre>[118th Congress Public Law 1]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



[[Page 137 STAT. 3]]

Public Law 118-1
118th Congress

                            Joint Resolution


 
Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving 
 the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022. &lt;&lt;NOTE: Mar. 20, 2023 -  [H.J. 
                               Res. 26]&gt;&gt; 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-789), enacted by the 
Council of the District of Columbia on January 17, 2023, and transmitted 
to Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia 
Home Rule Act on January 27, 2023.

    Approved March 20, 2023.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 26:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 169 (2023):
            Feb. 9, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

Subjects: Congress, Congressional elections, Constitution and constitutional amendments, House of Representatives, Members of Congress, Senate

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment limiting Representatives to six terms and Senators to two terms. Terms beginning before the ratification of this amendment do not count towards these term limits.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 3 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 3

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

Mr. Fallon submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No person who has served six terms as a Representative 
shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For 
purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in 
the House of Representatives shall be included as one term in 
determining the number of terms that such person has served as a 
Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than one year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served two terms as a Senator shall 
be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as one term in determining the number 
of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills 
the vacancy for more than three years.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

Subjects: Armed Forces and National Security, Abortion, Administrative law and regulatory procedures, Department of Veterans Affairs, Family planning and birth control, Sex and reproductive health, Veterans' medical care

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the interim final rule issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) titled <i>Reproductive Health Services </i>and published on September 9, 2022. The rule authorizes the VA to provide certain abortion-related care to veterans. The rule also applies to such care provided to beneficiaries covered under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA). </p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 31 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 31

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 
         Affairs relating to ``Reproductive Health Services''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2023

Mr. Cloud (for himself, Mr. Bost, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Massie, Mr. Rosendale, 
Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. Biggs, 
  Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Mann, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. Carl, Mr. 
 Hern, Mr. Banks, Mr. Babin, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mr. Weber of Texas, 
 Mr. Duncan, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. C. 
   Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Jackson of 
Texas, Mr. Allen, Mr. Posey, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Austin Scott 
 of Georgia, Mr. Roy, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Ms. 
Tenney, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mrs. Cammack, and Mr. Rouzer) submitted the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 
         Affairs relating to ``Reproductive Health Services''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to 
``Reproductive Health Services'' (87 Fed. Reg. 55287; published 
September 9, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Expressing the sense of Congress that a woman's ability to travel out of State to receive services available in that State which would otherwise not be available in the State that they reside in, is protected under Article IV of the Constitution.

Subjects: Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues, State and local government operations, Travel and tourism, Women's rights

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution expresses the sense of Congress that no state should enact any law that impedes a woman's ability to travel to another state or to receive services in another state that are unavailable in the woman's own state.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 34

 Expressing the sense of Congress that a woman's ability to travel out 
   of State to receive services available in that State which would 
    otherwise not be available in the State that they reside in, is 
            protected under Article IV of the Constitution.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2023

 Ms. Mace submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that a woman's ability to travel out 
   of State to receive services available in that State which would 
    otherwise not be available in the State that they reside in, is 
            protected under Article IV of the Constitution.

Whereas Section 2 of Article IV of the Constitution provides for the rights of a 
        citizen of one State who is temporarily visiting another State, the 
        privileges, and immunities of a citizen of the latter State;
Whereas the constitutional right to travel from one State to another is embedded 
        in our jurisprudence and affirmed by the Supreme Court in United States 
        v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745, 757 (1996); and
Whereas, in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, (1969), that the right is so 
        important that it is ``assertable against private interference as well 
        as governmental action . . . a virtually unconditional, personal right, 
        guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the sense of 
Congress that no State should enact any law that impedes a woman's 
ability to engage in interstate travel generally, or to receive 
services available in that State that are otherwise unavailable in 
their own State.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require individuals to demonstrate cognitive competence as a condition of holding the office of President or Vice President.

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, Constitution and constitutional amendments, Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring individuals to demonstrate cognitive competence as a condition of holding the office of President or Vice President.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 35

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require individuals to demonstrate cognitive competence as a condition 
         of holding the office of President or Vice President.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2023

  Mr. DesJarlais submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require individuals to demonstrate cognitive competence as a condition 
         of holding the office of President or Vice President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person shall be eligible to hold the office of 
President or Vice President unless the person demonstrates cognitive 
competence.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
through appropriate legislation.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Subjects: Economics and Public Finance


<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 36 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 36

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2023

Mr. Biggs submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed 
total receipts for that fiscal year.
    ``Section 2. The limit on the debt of the United States held by the 
public shall not be increased.
    ``Section 3. No bill to increase revenue shall become law unless 
approved by two-thirds of the whole number of each House by a rollcall 
vote.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

Subjects: Congress

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment to require that the seats in the House of Representatives be divided among the states based on their share of U.S. citizens rather than their share of the total U.S. population.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 37 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 37

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2023

  Mr. Davidson (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
    Jackson of Texas, and Mr. Perry) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States 
according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by 
counting the number of persons in each State who are citizens of the 
United States.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to "Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414".

Subjects: Foreign Trade and International Finance, Administrative law and regulatory procedures, Alternative and renewable resources, Asia, Cambodia, China, Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits, Department of Commerce, Malaysia, Tariffs, Thailand, Vietnam

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the final rule submitted by the Department of Commerce titled <i>Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414</i> and published on September 16, 2022. The rule allows for the suspension of duties on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules (i.e., solar panels) that are completed in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, or Vietnam using parts and components manufactured in China that are not already subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 39 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 39

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating 
    to ``Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and 
   Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

   Mr. Posey (for himself, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. 
 Pascrell, Mr. Latta, Ms. Sewell, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Deluzio, Mr. Murphy, 
  and Ms. Tenney) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating 
    to ``Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and 
   Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to ``Procedures 
Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in 
Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414'' (87 Fed. Reg. 56868), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a fiscal year unless both Houses of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution on the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal year.

Subjects: Congress, Budget process, Constitution and constitutional amendments, Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management, Legislative rules and procedure, Members of Congress

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a fiscal year unless both chambers have agreed to an identical concurrent resolution on the budget for that fiscal year before October 1.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 4 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 4

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   prohibit Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a 
fiscal year unless both Houses of Congress have agreed to a concurrent 
resolution on the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of 
                           that fiscal year.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Gallagher) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   prohibit Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a 
fiscal year unless both Houses of Congress have agreed to a concurrent 
resolution on the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of 
                           that fiscal year.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. A Member of Congress may not receive a compensation 
for service as a Member of Congress during a fiscal year unless both 
Houses of Congress have agreed to an identical concurrent resolution on 
the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 
year.
    ``Section 2. This article shall apply with respect to fiscal years 
which begin after this article becomes a valid part of the 
Constitution.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit voting in Federal, State, or local elections by individuals who are not citizens of the United States.

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, Constitution and constitutional amendments, Elections, voting, political campaign regulation, Immigration status and procedures, Voting rights

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment that prohibits an individual who is not a U.S. citizen from voting in federal, state, or local elections for public office or voting on any ballot initiative or referendum held in the United States.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 40

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 prohibit voting in Federal, State, or local elections by individuals 
               who are not citizens of the United States.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

 Ms. Tenney (for herself, Mr. Moylan, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Bost, 
 Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Ms. Stefanik, Mrs. Bice, and Mr. Santos) submitted 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 prohibit voting in Federal, State, or local elections by individuals 
               who are not citizens of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. An individual may not vote in any election for public 
office held in the United States, including any election for Federal, 
State, or local office, or vote on any ballot initiative or referendum 
held in the United States, unless the individual is a citizen of the 
United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security relating to "Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility".

Subjects: Immigration, Administrative law and regulatory procedures, Department of Homeland Security, Immigrant health and welfare, Immigration status and procedures


<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 41 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 41

   Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland 
   Security relating to ``Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

Mr. Nehls (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Ogles, 
  and Mr. Jackson of Texas) submitted the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
   Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland 
   Security relating to ``Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security relating to 
``Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility'' (87 Fed. Reg. 5547), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022.

Subjects: Government Operations and Politics, Congressional oversight, District of Columbia, Law enforcement administration and funding, State and local government operations

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia. The act sets forth a variety of measures that focus on policing in the District, including measures prohibiting the use of certain neck restraints by law enforcement officers, requiring additional procedures related to body-worn cameras, and expanding access to police disciplinary records.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
 approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act 
                                of 2022.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

 Mr. Clyde (for himself, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. 
  Carter of Georgia, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Issa, Mr. 
Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Grothman, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Hern, Mr. Webster 
 of Florida, Mr. Yakym, Mr. Stauber, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. D'Esposito, Mr. 
  Comer, and Mrs. Boebert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
 approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act 
                                of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 
(D.C. Act 24-781), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia 
on January 19, 2023, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 
602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 26, 
2023.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Prince Jonah Kūhiō Kalaniana‘ole Protecting Family Legacies Act

Subjects: Native Americans, Alaska Natives and Hawaiians, Congressional oversight, Federal-Indian relations, Hawaii, Indian lands and resources rights, State and local government operations

Summary:  <p><strong>Prince Jonah K&#363hi&#333 Kalaniana'ole Protecting Family Legacies Act</strong></p> <p>This joint resolution consents to the Hawaii legislature's amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. In 2017, the Hawaii legislature reduced the minimum Native Hawaiian blood quantum required for an individual to inherit a homestead lease under the act.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

  To consent to the amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 
       1920, made by Act 080 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 2017.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2023

Ms. Tokuda submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  To consent to the amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 
       1920, made by Act 080 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 2017.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Prince Jonah Kuhio 
Kalaniana`ole Protecting Family Legacies Act''.

SEC. 2. CONSENT TO AMENDMENTS.

    As required by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide 
for the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union'', approved 
March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4), the United States consents to the 
amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, made by Act 080 
of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 2017, as adopted by the State of Hawaii 
in the manner required for State legislation.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat".

Subjects: Public Lands and Natural Resources, Administrative law and regulatory procedures, Department of Commerce, Wildlife conservation and habitat protection

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service titled<i> Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat</i> and published on June 24, 2022. </p> <p>The 2022 rule rescinds an earlier rule which limited the ability of the service to designate an area a <i>critical habitat</i>. Areas designated as <i>critical habitat</i> are subject to certain statutory restrictions.</p> <p> <p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 46 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 46

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
 Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
                    Designating Critical Habitat''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

 Mr. Bentz (for himself, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. 
    Tiffany, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Valadao, and Mr. Zinke) submitted the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
 Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
                    Designating Critical Habitat''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to 
``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical 
Habitat'' (87 Fed. Reg. 37757; published June 24, 2022), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.

Subjects: Taxation, Constitution and constitutional amendments, General taxation matters

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment repealing the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution (authorizing taxation of income).</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 47

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

  Mr. Davidson (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
    Jackson of Texas, and Mr. Perry) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein),
    Section 1. That the following article is proposed as an amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 
intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Effective 2 years after the ratification of this article of 
amendment, the sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States is repealed, and the Congress shall have no power to 
lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, except 
in time of war declared by the Congress.''.
    Sec. 2. Not later than 180 days after the ratification of the 
article of amendment in section 1, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
submit a report to Congress containing recommendations for any 
legislation that may be necessary to implement such article.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat".

Subjects: Animals

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service titled<i> Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat</i> and published on November 30, 2022. This rule reclassifies the northern long-eared bat (<em>Myotis septentrionalis</em>) from a threatened species to an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. The rule also removes the northern long-eared bat's species-specific rule, which applied only when the bat was listed as a threatened species.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 49

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
    Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

Mr. Stauber (for himself, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. 
 Flood, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Perry, Mr. Smith of 
 Missouri, and Mrs. Boebert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
    Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating 
to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species 
Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat'' (87 Fed. Reg. 73488; published 
November 30, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress.

Subjects: Congress, Congressional elections, Constitution and constitutional amendments, House of Representatives, Members of Congress, Senate

Summary:  <p>This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment limiting Representatives to six terms and Senators to two terms. The amendment shall not apply to any person who served as a Representative or a Senator before the 118th Congress.</p>

<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 5 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 5

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Gallagher) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No person shall serve as a Representative for more 
than six two-year terms. Service as a Representative for more than one 
year of any two-year term shall be treated as a complete term for 
purposes of this section, without regard to whether the service was 
completed by the individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for more than two 
six-year terms. Service as a Senator for more than three years of any 
six-year term shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 
section, without regard to whether the service was completed by the 
individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not apply to any person who served 
as a Representative or as a Senator during any Congress occurring 
before the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.''.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B)".

Subjects: Finance and Financial Sector


<html><body><pre>[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

&lt;DOC&gt;






118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 50

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
  Financial Protection relating to ``Small Business Lending Under the 
             Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B)''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2023

Mr. Williams of Texas (for himself, Mr. Ogles, and Mr. Barr) submitted 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
  Financial Protection relating to ``Small Business Lending Under the 
             Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B)''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act 
(Regulation B)'', and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 &lt;all&gt;
</pre></body></html>