and come even closer to this supervised baseline this could be because you know if you have more parameters technically in a supervised method you would also need more labeled images maybe and therefore it doesn't scale as well I don't I don't know there is a lot of unclarity in this research like all they show is that their numbers are good which is cool right and it's cool that you don't need your you don't need the negative samples anymore and it actually doesn't collapse when you do that kind of stuff but there's a lot of I don't