technology in order to get back to at least more normal way of life with less infringement of fundamental rights every day and I think it's a moral obligation actually to do this and we should be asking ourselves what we would be asked if he would not prove up I think the last sentence was cut off could you distribute that if you could not provide well if we are asked whether its moral morally defendable to use technology we also have to ask the question the other way around is it more about just morally justifiable not to