need to do it in two steps and therefore i need two layers and that's going to be the culprit of this method here and you know while it is mentioned in the paper it's sort of i feel at least that's my my assessment of this paper it's kind of swept under the rug a little bit i mean they do have a theorem that clearly says we can construct an example of a task that in the full attention setting can be solved with a single step so a single layer that in our random attention setting needs a lot of layers so a lot of steps