we say, okay, well, we can increase the expected value for this action to one and lower it to minus one in this case, for example, by always guessing tails. That is okay because since this situation is only encountered 50 percent of the time, the expected value for this action is now just 0.5, and so that matches the deviant actions, so we're not giving up anything. Does anybody see the problem with this? All right. The problem is, if that chance node had gone the other way, if it had gone right, we would apply this same exact reasoning.