Within 50 hands of playing, they could figure out how the bot had changed. So yes, if you can make an AI that could figure out how to do this better than humans, then that that might be valuable. But we're playing against really talented humans and we didn't think that we could beat them at that game, but then also why bother playing that game? Why bother trying to play that mind game if we can just approximate a Nash equilibrium and guarantee that we're going to win. So, I would argue that in the two player zero-sum game,