You don't think if it's just wrong versus this weird like if you only increase the values for the left of the public chance node. >> Yeah, so let's see where the situation- >> You set those first to explain it? >> Yeah. >> It seems like this is still correct. It's just weird because you're saying if nature flips a coin heads, then I'm going to do this weird reaction, and if it's tails, then I'm not. >> So, I'll say this. If you were actually only increasing the expected value to one in this situation, and keeping the expected value at zero