the reviewer of a paper I read the related work but often related work is just like you first of all you site a bunch of your friends and then you cite the mandatory papers and then you cite every single person that you think could be a reviewer because or you've actually been rejected from a conference with a reviewer claiming that your you haven't compared or you haven't cited data or that paper you can pretty much be sure that that's the if if it's not a glaring of may omission if it's like a niche paper and you haven't cited it then