Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC, NASDAQ)
Industry: Packaged Foods
Annual report, fiscal year 2013


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

PROXY STATEMENT

AND

2013 ANNUAL REPORT






Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Dear Fellow Pilgrim’s Stockholders:

The effective execution of our strategy over the past three years has enabled Pilgrims to realize significant improvement in our financial results for fiscal 2013. We recognized net revenues of $8.4 billion for the year while generating net income of $549.6 million, or diluted earnings per share of $2.12. Our EBITDA* (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes Depreciation and Amortization) reached $800.4 million, a reflection of the dedication to continuous improvement at every level of our organization.

We are focusing our resources on our key customers, helping them target their customers' needs, reducing the cost of doing business and anticipating new developments that will grow their business. Our relentless pursuit of operational excellence has improved our operations and sales mix and continually identifies new areas of potential improvement. Using 2010 as a baseline, our focus on operational excellence has captured $642 million in improvements over the past three years.

In addition, our value-added export sales have direction and a strategic plan to continue the trajectory of growth and reduced volatility from pure commodity markets.

We are building a result-oriented culture where accountability and ownership have taken root deep within the organization. This is evident as each progressive step brings more clarity and data driven analysis, from plant-level P&L views to our zero-based budgeting.

We continue to effectively manage our working capital and cash generation. We have one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry and we are looking for the right opportunities to profitably grow our business in complementary segments and geographies. We already have begun expanding in Veracruz, Mexico, with initial live operations planned to come online by 2015. This expansion will provide better access to a growing market in a region with strong demand for competitive protein.

We are pleased with the improvements we’ve seen within Pilgrim’s over the last years, but we won’t allow ourselves to become complacent. Our consistent execution against our strategy has enabled us to refine our expectations and challenge our team members in our mission to become the best managed and most respected company in our industry.

Thank you for your continued support through this process.



President & Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2014

* As defined in our reconciliation to GAAP within our annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29, 2013



This page intentionally left blank.



# Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation

# 1770 Promontory Circle
Greeley, Colorado 80634

# NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

## To Be Held May 2, 2014

The annual meeting of stockholders of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation will be held at Pilgrim’s Pride corporate headquarters, at 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado, on Friday, May 2, 2014, at 8:00 a.m., local time, to consider and vote on the following matters:

1. To elect Gilberto Tomazoni, Joesley Mendonça Batista, Wesley Mendonça Batista, William W. Lovette, Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes and Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior as the six JBS Directors for the ensuing year;

2. To elect David E. Bell, Michael L. Cooper, and Charles Macaluso as the three Equity Directors for the ensuing year;

3. To conduct a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation;

4. To approve the terms of the performance goals established for the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Incentive Plan;

5. To approve the terms of the performance goals established for the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan;

6. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2014; and

7. To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

No other matters are expected to be voted on at the annual meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 14, 2014, as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. If you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on that date, you are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote at your earliest convenience. Most stockholders have three options for submitting their votes prior to the meeting:

(1) via the internet;

(2) by phone; or

(3) by mail.

Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.

Admission to the annual meeting will be limited to our stockholders, proxy holders and invited guests. If you are a stockholder of record, please bring photo identification to the annual meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other third party, please bring photo identification and a current brokerage statement.



## YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY OR VOTE YOUR SHARES ON THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PROXY CARD.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 2014: The Proxy Statement and the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.envisionreports.com/PPC. Enter the 12-digit control number located on the proxy card and click “View Stockholder Material.”



## TABLE OF CONTENTS

General Information 1
Proposal 1. Election of JBS Directors 7
Proposal 2. Election of Equity Directors 9
Proposal 3. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation 11
Proposal 4. Approval of the Terms of the Performance Goals Established for the Short-Term Management Incentive Plan 12
Proposal 5. Approval of the Terms of the Performance Goals Established for the Long Term Incentive Plan 15
Corporate Governance 18
Report of the Compensation Committee 21
Compensation Discussion and Analysis 22
Executive Compensation 33
2013 Director Compensation Table 44
Related Party Transactions 45
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Information 46
Report of the Audit Committee 48
Proposal 6. Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 49
Security Ownership Table 50
Equity Compensation Plan Information 51
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance 51
Householding of Stockholder Materials 51
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on May 2, 2014 51
Other Business 52



This page intentionally left blank.



# Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation

1770 Promontory Circle
Greeley, Colorado 80634

PROXY STATEMENT

## GENERAL INFORMATION

## Why did I receive this proxy statement?

The Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation is soliciting stockholder proxies for use at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held at the Pilgrim’s Pride corporate headquarters, at 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado, on Friday, May 2, 2014, at 8:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof (the “Annual Meeting” or the “meeting”). This proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and the annual report to stockholders of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation are being mailed on or about March 31, 2014. Throughout this proxy statement, we will refer to Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation as “Pilgrim’s Pride,” “Pilgrim’s,” “PPC,” “we,” “us” or the “Company.”

## What is the record date for the Annual Meeting and why is it important?

The Board of Directors has fixed March 14, 2014 as the record date for determining stockholders who are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”). At the close of business on the Record Date, Pilgrim’s Pride had 259,029,033 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding.

## What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Most stockholders of Pilgrim’s Pride hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholders of Record: If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the meeting.

Beneficial Owner: If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker on how to vote your shares, and you are also invited to attend the meeting. Since you are not a stockholder of record, however, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a signed proxy from the holder of record giving you the right to vote the shares.

## What is a proxy?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person (the “proxy”) to vote on your behalf. By completing and returning the enclosed proxy card, you are giving the proxies appointed by the Board and identified on the proxy card the authority to vote your shares in the manner you indicate on your proxy card.

## What if I receive more than one proxy card?

You will receive multiple proxy cards if you hold shares of our common stock in different ways (e.g., joint tenancy, trusts, custodial accounts) or in multiple accounts. If your shares are held in “street name” (i.e., by a broker, bank or other nominee), you will receive your proxy card or voting information from your nominee, and you must return your voting instructions to that nominee. You should complete, sign and return each proxy card you receive or submit your voting instructions for each proxy card.



## What are the voting rights of the common stock?

Each holder of record of our common stock on the Record Date is entitled to cast one vote per share on each matter presented at the meeting.

## What are the two categories of Directors?

The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) provides for six JBS Directors and three Equity Directors.

JBS Directors are the six Directors designated as JBS Directors pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or their successors nominated or appointed by the JBS Nominating Committee. The current JBS Directors are Gilberto Tomazoni, Joesley Mendonça Batista, Wesley Mendonça Batista, William W. Lovette, Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes and Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior.

Equity Directors are the three Directors designated as Equity Directors pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or their successors nominated or appointed by the Equity Nominating Committee or any stockholders other than JBS USA Holdings, Inc. ("JBS USA") and its affiliates ("Minority Investors"). The current Equity Directors are David E. Bell, Michael L. Cooper, and Charles Macaluso.

## What are the differences between the categories of Directors?

All of our Directors serve coequal one-year terms. However, only JBS Directors can serve as members of the JBS Nominating Committee, and only Equity Directors can serve as members of the Equity Nominating Committee.

The stockholders agreement between us and JBS USA dated December 28, 2009 (as amended, the “JBS Stockholders Agreement”) requires JBS USA and its affiliates to vote all of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock that they hold in the same manner as the shares held by all Minority Investors with respect to the election or removal of Equity Directors. Consequently, the vote of the Minority Investors will determine the outcome of the election of Equity Directors.

With respect to all other matters submitted to a vote of holders of common stock, including the election or removal of any JBS Directors, JBS USA and its affiliates may vote shares of common stock held by them at their sole and absolute discretion.

## What is the “Say on Pay” Vote?

With Proposal 3, the Board is providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal, gives you, as a stockholder, the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation programs and policies and the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers.

## Why are approvals required for the Short-Term Management Incentive Plan and the Long Term Incentive Plan?

The Board is submitting Proposals 4 and 5 relating to the Short-Term Management Incentive Plan and the Long Term Incentive Plan for the stockholders to ratify and approve the material terms of the performance goals under those plans, which were last approved in 2009. Stockholder approval of the material terms of the performance goals under these plans permits the Company to have the opportunity to deduct, for federal income tax purposes, certain performance-based compensation over $1,000,000 paid to certain of the Company’s officers under the plans. The material terms of the performance goals for the awards under the plans must be disclosed to, and approved by, the stockholders every five years to permit the Company to deduct fully for tax purposes the incentive awards paid under the plans.



## How do I vote my shares?

If you are a “stockholder of record,” you have several choices. You can vote your proxy:

• by completing, dating, signing and mailing the enclosed proxy card;

• over the telephone; or

• via the internet.

Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.

If you hold your shares in “street name,” your broker, bank or nominee will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares.

If you are a current or former employee of Pilgrim’s Pride who holds shares in either the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Retirement Savings Plan or the To-Ricos Employee Savings and Retirement Plan, your vote serves as a voting instruction to the trustee for this plan. To be timely, if you vote your shares in the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Retirement Savings Plan or the To-Ricos Employee Savings and Retirement Plan by telephone or Internet, your vote must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 30, 2014. If you do not vote by telephone or Internet, please return your proxy card as soon as possible. If you vote in a timely manner, the trustee will vote the shares as you have directed. If you do not vote, or if you do not vote in a timely manner, the trustee will vote your shares in the same proportion as the shares voted by participants who timely return their cards to the trustee.

## What are the Board’s recommendations on how I should vote my shares?

The Board recommends that you vote your shares as follows:

Proposal 1: FOR the election of all six nominees for JBS Director.

Proposal 2: FOR the election of all three nominees for Equity Director.

Proposal 3: FOR the approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation.

Proposal 4: FOR the approval of the terms of the performance goals established for the Short-Term Management Incentive Plan.

Proposal 5: FOR the approval of the terms of the performance goals established for the Long Term Incentive Plan.

Proposal 6: FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2014.

## What are my choices when voting?

With respect to:

Proposal 1: You may either (i) vote “FOR” the election of all JBS Director nominees as a group; (ii) withhold your vote on all JBS Director nominees as a group; or (iii) vote “FOR” the election of all JBS Director nominees as a group except for certain nominees identified by you in the appropriate area on the proxy card or voting instructions.

Proposal 2: You may either (i) vote “FOR” the election of all Equity Director nominees as a group; (ii) withhold your vote on all Equity Director nominees as a group; or (iii) vote “FOR” the election of all Equity Director nominees as a group except for certain nominees identified by you in the appropriate area on the proxy card or voting instructions.

Proposal 3: You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal, or you may elect to abstain from voting your shares. Abstaining will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, as discussed below.



Proposal 4: You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal, or you may elect to abstain from voting your shares. Abstaining will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, as discussed below.

Proposal 5: You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal, or you may elect to abstain from voting your shares. Abstaining will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, as discussed below.

Proposal 6: You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal, or you may elect to abstain from voting your shares. Abstaining will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, as discussed below.

## How will my shares be voted if I do not specify my voting instructions?

If you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how you want your shares to be voted, the proxies appointed by the Board will vote your shares as follows:

Proposal 1: FOR the election of all six nominees for JBS Director.

Proposal 2: FOR the election of all three nominees for Equity Director.

Proposal 3: FOR the approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation.

Proposal 4: FOR the approval of the terms of the performance goals established for the Short-Term Management Incentive Plan.

Proposal 5: FOR the approval of the terms of the performance goals established for the Long Term Incentive Plan.

Proposal 6: FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2014.

If you are a current or former employee of Pilgrim’s Pride who holds shares through the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Savings Plan or the To-Ricos Employee Savings and Retirement Plan you will be given the opportunity to provide instruction to the trustee with respect to how to vote your shares. Any shares for which instructions are not received (i) shall be voted by the trustee in accordance with instructions provided by Pilgrim’s Pride with respect to shares held under the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Savings Plan and (ii) will not be voted with respect to shares held under the To-Ricos Employee Savings and Retirement Plan.

## What is a quorum?

A “quorum” is necessary to hold the meeting. A quorum consists of a majority of the voting power of our common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting, including the voting power that is present in person or by proxy. The shares of a stockholder whose ballot on any or all proposals is marked as “abstain” will be included in the number of shares present at the Annual Meeting to determine whether a quorum is present. If a quorum is not represented in person or by proxy at the meeting or any adjourned meeting, the chairman of the meeting may postpone the meeting from time to time until a quorum will be represented. At any adjourned meeting at which a quorum is represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the meeting as originally called. JBS USA owned or controlled over 50% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock on the Record Date. Therefore, JBS USA will be able to assure a quorum is present.

## What vote is required to approve the proposals for the election of the JBS Directors and the Equity Directors?

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the voting power of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting. This means that the director who receives the most votes will be elected.



Because JBS USA owned or controlled over 50% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock on the Record Date, it will be able to elect all of the nominees for JBS Directors and, with certain exceptions, determine the outcome of all other matters presented to a vote of the stockholders. The JBS Stockholders Agreement, however, requires JBS USA and its affiliates to vote all of Pilgrim's Pride common stock owned by them in the same manner as the shares held by the Minority Investors with respect to the election or removal of Equity Directors. Consequently, the vote of the Minority Investors will determine the outcome of Proposal 2.

## What Vote is Required for Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation?

With regard to Proposal 3, the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, the results of this vote are not binding on the Board, meaning that our Board will not be obligated to take any compensation actions, or to adjust our executive compensation programs or policies, as a result of the vote. Notwithstanding the advisory nature of the vote, the resolution will be considered passed with the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy and eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting.

## What Vote is Required for Approval of the Performance Goals Established Under the Short-Term Management Incentive Plan?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the material terms of the performance goals established under the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Management Incentive Plan. An affirmative vote by a stockholder shall also be deemed to be approval of the material terms of the performance goals under the plan for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

## What Vote is Required for Approval of the Performance Goals Established Under the Long Term Incentive Plan?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the material terms of the performance goals established under the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan. An affirmative vote by a stockholder shall also be deemed to be approval of the material terms of the performance goals under the plan for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

## What vote is required for the appointment of KPMG LLP and to approve any other item of business to be voted upon at the meeting?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm and to approve any other item of business to be voted upon at the meeting.

With respect to approval of any other item of business to be voted upon at the meeting, including the election or removal of any JBS Directors, JBS USA and its affiliates may vote shares of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock held by them at their sole and absolute discretion.

## How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

Abstentions from voting on any matter will be counted in the tally of votes. Abstentions will have no effect on the election of Directors. However, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against any other proposals.

A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. A broker non-vote will be deemed “present” at the Annual Meeting and will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. Under the rules that govern brokers who are voting with respect to shares held by them in street name, if the broker has not been furnished with voting instructions by its client at least ten days before the meeting, those brokers have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. Routine matters include the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm, submitted to the stockholders in Proposal 6. Non-routine matters include the election of Directors, the advisory



vote on executive compensation, the approval of the terms of the performance goals established under the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Management Incentive Plan, and the approval of the terms of the performance goals established under the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan, submitted to stockholders in Proposal 1, Proposal 2, Proposal 3, Proposal 4 and Proposal 5. With regard to Proposal 1, Proposal 2, Proposal 3, Proposal 4 and Proposal 5 brokers have no discretion to vote shares where no voting instructions are received, and no vote will be cast if you do not vote on those proposals. Consequently, broker non-votes will have no effect on the elections of Directors or the advisory vote on executive compensation and will have the same effect as a vote against any other proposals.

We urge you to vote on ALL voting items.

## Can I change my vote after I have mailed in my proxy card?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy by doing one of the following:

• by sending to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation that is received prior to the meeting;

• by submitting a new proxy card bearing a later date to the Secretary of the Company so that it is received prior to the meeting; or

• by attending the meeting and voting your shares in person.

## Who will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the cost of preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement and of soliciting proxies. We will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other like parties to forward copies of proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock and will reimburse these parties for their reasonable and customary charges or expenses.

## Is this proxy statement the only way that proxies are being solicited?

No. In addition to mailing these proxy materials, certain of our Directors, officers or employees may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile, e-mail or personal contact. They will not be specifically compensated for doing so.

## Stockholder Proposals for 2015 Annual Meeting

We currently expect that our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Friday, May 1, 2015. Our bylaws state that a stockholder must have given our Secretary written notice, at our principal executive offices, of the stockholder’s intent to present a proposal (including nominations of Directors) at the 2015 Annual Meeting by January 1, 2015, but not before August 4, 2014. Additionally, in order for stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the 2015 Annual Meeting, they must be received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 1, 2014.



# PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF JBS DIRECTORS

Subject to limited exceptions, our Certificate of Incorporation specifies that the Board of Directors will consist of nine members. Our Board currently has nine members. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the nine nominees named.

Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation and our bylaws, our Board of Directors includes six JBS Directors, including the Chairman of the Board, who are designated by the JBS Nominating Committee.

At the Annual Meeting, nine Directors, including six JBS Directors, are to be elected, each to hold office for one year or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy card or voting instructions, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted for the election of the six nominees named below. If any JBS Director nominee becomes unavailable for election, it is intended that such shares will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee selected by the JBS Nominating Committee. Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any substitute nominee or nominees will be required.

## Nominees for JBS Directors

Gilberto Tomazoni, 55, currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, having been appointed in July 2013. Beginning in 2013, Mr. Tomazoni also served as president of the Global Poultry Division of JBS S.A. Before joining JBS S.A., Mr. Tomazoni spent four years with Bunge Alimentos S.A. as Vice President of Foods and Ingredients. Prior to that, Mr. Tomazoni served 27 years with Sadia S.A., a leading provider of both frozen and refrigerated food products in Brazil, in various roles, including Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to 2009. He earned an M.A. degree in management development in 1991 from Fundação de Ensino do Desenvolvimento and a B.Sc. degree in mechanical engineering in 1982 from the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Mr. Tomazoni has served as a board member of Brazil Fast Food Corporation since 2009, a member of the International Advisory Council for Fundação Dom Cabral since 2009 and a member of the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Tourism-Brazil/Russia since 2008.

Mr. Tomazoni brings over 30 years of diverse poultry, protein, and food industry experience to the Company. Mr. Tomazoni’s extensive experience and education in the global poultry industry provides invaluable direction to the Company’s strategies domestically and in international markets. As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Tomazoni has direct oversight of Pilgrim’s strategy and operations.

Joesley Mendonça Batista, 42, is currently the President of the Board of Directors of JBS S.A. and served as the Chief Executive Officer of JBS S.A. from March 2006 until January 2011. Mr. Batista has served as a Director of the Company since December 2009. Mr. Batista has served in various capacities at JBS S.A. since 1988. Mr. Batista is the brother of Wesley Mendonça Batista, a Director of the Company, and José Batista Júnior, a Director of JBS S.A., and the son of José Batista Sobrinho, the founder of JBS S.A. and a member of its Board of Directors.

Mr. Batista has worked in the protein industry for over 20 years, rising to the post of President and Chief Executive Officer of JBS S.A from March 2006 until January 2011. During his tenure as President and CEO, JBS S.A. expanded dramatically in the United States, acquiring Swift & Company in 2007, Smithfield Beef Group and Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding in 2008, and a 64% interest in the Company in 2009. Mr. Batista brings to the Board significant leadership, sales and marketing, industry, technical, and global experience in the protein industry.

Wesley Mendonça Batista, 43, has served as a Director of the Board of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation since December 2009 and served as Chairman of the Board of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation from December 2009 until July 2013. Mr. Batista became President and Chief Executive Officer of JBS S.A. in February 2011. Mr. Batista previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of JBS USA from July 2007 until January 2011. Mr. Batista also serves as Chairman of the Board of JBS USA and is the Vice President of JBS S.A.’s Board of Directors. Mr. Batista has served in various capacities at JBS S.A. since 1987. Mr. Batista is the brother of Joesley Mendonça Batista, Chairman of the Board of JBS S.A., and José Batista Júnior, a Director of JBS S.A., and is the son of José Batista Sobrinho, the founder of JBS S.A. and a member of its Board of Directors.



Mr. Batista brings to the Board of Pilgrim’s Pride significant senior leadership and industry experience. Mr. Batista has long been one of the most respected executives in Brazil’s protein industry, and his reputation is now firmly established worldwide. Mr. Batista grew up in the protein industry, and it is his strategic insight and entrepreneurial spirit that has facilitated the growth of JBS S.A. through numerous acquisitions, expanding its reach across the globe.

William W. Lovette, 54, joined Pilgrim’s Pride as President and Chief Executive Officer on January 3, 2011. He brings more than 30 years of industry leadership experience to Pilgrim’s. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Case Foods, Inc. from October 2008 to December 2010. Before joining Case Foods, Inc., Mr. Lovette spent 25 years with Tyson Foods Inc. in various roles in senior management, including President of its International Business Unit, President of its Foodservice Business Unit and Senior Group Vice President of Poultry and Prepared Foods. Mr. Lovette earned a B.S. degree from Texas A&M University. In addition, he is a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.

Mr. Lovette brings invaluable industry-specific experience to the Board, having worked in the poultry industry his entire life. Mr. Lovette grew up in a family poultry business, which became the Holly Farms Corporation. Through his formative years, he worked in virtually all aspects of the business including farm labor and management on his family’s broiler farm, catching chickens, working in all areas of a processing plant during summers, working as a customer service representative and as a trading floor clerk on the Chicago Board of Trade. Mr. Lovette’s experience learned over a lifetime in the industry enables him to offer a valuable insight on the business, financial and regulatory issues currently being faced by the poultry industry.

Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes, 74, has served as a Director since December 2009. He is currently President of the Business Strategy Committee of JBS Friboi, Vice Chairman of the Board of COSAN Ltd., a member of the Board of COSCEX - Superior Council of Foreign Trade at FIESP (Foreign Trade Board of the Federation of Industries of the State of Sao Paulo), and Director of DEAGRO Division - Agrobusiness Department for Products of Animal Origin at FIESP (Foreign Trade Board of the Federation of Industries of the State of Sao Paulo). Dr. Pratini de Moraes was a former Chairman of the Advisory Board of Solvay and Cie., Brazil, former Chairman of the Brazilian Chapter of CEAL (Business Council of Latin America), and a former member of the Advisory Council of BM&F (Brazilian Mercantile & Futures Exchange). Dr. Pratini de Moraes was a member of the Supervisory Board of ABN AMRO Bank from 2003 to 2007. He also had a long career in Brazil’s public sector.

Dr. Pratini de Moraes brings to the Board of Directors continuing experience in dealing with foreign governments and substantial expertise in matters affecting international commerce. Dr. Pratini de Moraes has served in various roles in Brazilian government including, but not limited to, the Deputy Minister of Planning, the Minister of Industry and Trade, a Congressman, the Minister of Mines and Energy and the Minister of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply. Additionally, as a director for other multinational companies, Dr. Pratini de Moraes also provides cross-board experience.

Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior, 56, has served as a Director since December 2009. He has served as a Partner of Iposeira Partners Ltd, a provider of advisory services for mergers and acquisitions and restructuring transactions, since 2003. Mr. Vasconcellos served as a Consultant to IFC/World Bank from 2003 to 2008. He is currently a Member of the Board of Santos Brasil S.A. and served as a Member of the Board of Cremer S.A. from 2006 to 2008.

Regarded as one of Brazil’s preeminent business strategists, Mr. Vasconcellos brings to the Board real-time experience in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, finance, and restructurings, and offers unique insights into global market strategies. In addition, Mr. Vasconcellos’ experience working on behalf of public financial institutions enables him to provide perspective and oversight with regard to the Company’s financial strategies.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of all of the individuals who have been nominated to serve as JBS Directors. Proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise or withhold authority to vote.



# PROPOSAL 2. ELECTION OF EQUITY DIRECTORS

Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation and our bylaws, our Board of Directors includes three members designated by the Equity Nominating Committee, which we refer to as our Equity Directors.

The JBS Stockholders Agreement requires JBS USA and its affiliates to vote all of the Pilgrim’s Pride common stock that they hold in the same manner as the shares held by the Minority Investors with respect to the election or removal of Equity Directors. Consequently, the vote of the Minority Investors will determine the outcome of this Proposal 2.

At the Annual Meeting, nine Directors, including three Equity Directors, are to be elected, each to hold office for one year or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy card or voting instructions, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted for the election of the three nominees named below. If any of the nominees for Equity Director becomes unavailable for election, it is intended that such shares will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee selected by the Equity Nominating Committee.

## Nominees for Equity Director

David E. Bell, 64, has served as a Director since July 2012. Mr. Bell has expertise in a number of areas including risk management, marketing and agribusiness. He is currently the George M. Moffett Professor of Agriculture and Business at Harvard Business School. At Harvard Business School he leads the annual agribusiness executive seminar and has been chairman of the school’s marketing faculty and Senior Associate Dean with responsibility for faculty recruiting. He has degrees from Oxford and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Dr. Bell, with his 35 years on the faculty of Harvard Business School, has significant experience in marketing, retailing, risk management and economics. He studies all aspects of the food chain, from farming to distribution to trends in consumer eating habits, which provides valuable insights to the Board.

Michael L. Cooper, 64, has served as a Director since December 2009. He is the Executive Vice President, Managing Partner, Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Kincannon & Reed, an executive search firm for the food and agribusiness sectors, where he has been employed since July 2004. He also currently serves on the National Chicken Council’s Allied Leader Board. From September 2002 to July 2004, Mr. Cooper served as the Chief Executive Officer of Meyer Natural Angus. From January 1996 to July 2002, Mr. Cooper was employed by Perdue Farms, Inc., where he served in various roles, including as President, Retail Products, from February 2000 to July 2002, and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from January 1996 through February 2000. From August 1992 to January 1996, he served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Rocco Enterprises. Mr. Cooper also served in various senior financial roles with Dial Corporation over a 14 year career with that company.

Mr. Cooper brings to the Board significant senior leadership, management, operational, financial, and brand management experience. His extensive poultry industry experience enables him to offer a valuable insight on the business, financial and regulatory issues currently being faced by the poultry industry.

Charles Macaluso, 70, has served as a Director since December 2009. He has been a principal of Dorchester Capital, LLC, a management consulting and corporate advisory service firm focusing on operational assessment, strategic planning and workouts since 1998. From 1996 to 1998, he was a partner at Miller Associates, Inc., a workout, turnaround partnership, focusing on operational assessment, strategic planning and crisis management. Mr. Macaluso currently serves as a director of the following public companies: Global Power Equipment Group Inc., where he is also Chairman of the Board and a member of the audit committee; and Darling International, where he is also Lead Director. He also serves as a Chairman of the Board of three private companies. Mr. Macaluso previously served as a director of Global Crossing Ltd., where he was also a member of the audit committee.



Mr. Macaluso brings fundamental expertise to our Board in the areas of operational assessment, strategic planning, crisis management, and turnaround advisory services, which expertise supports the Board’s efforts in overseeing and advising on strategy and financial matters. In addition, Mr. Macaluso brings to the Board substantial cross-board expertise due to his tenure on a number of public and private company boards and committees.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of all of the individuals who have been nominated to serve as Equity Directors. Proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise or withhold authority vote.



## PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board is providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives you, as a stockholder, the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation programs and policies and the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers.

The "Say-on-Pay" vote is advisory and thus not binding on the Compensation Committee or the Board. The advisory vote will not affect any compensation already paid or awarded to any Named Executive Officer and will not overrule any decisions by the Compensation Committee or the Board. The Board values the opinions of the Company’s stockholders as expressed through their votes and other communications. Although the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board will review and carefully consider the outcome of the advisory vote on executive compensation and those opinions when making future decisions regarding executive compensation programs.

At the annual meeting of our stockholders held on May 3, 2013, only 0.31% of the votes present (excludes abstentions and broker non-votes) voted against the 2012 “Say-on-Pay” proposal related to Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee believes that this stockholder vote indicates strong support for our executive compensation program.

We design our executive compensation programs to implement our core objectives of attracting key leaders, motivating our executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers, rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence and aligning the long-term interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. Stockholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this proxy statement. In the CD&A, we have provided stockholders with a description of our compensation programs, including the principles and policies underpinning the programs, the individual elements of the compensation programs and how our compensation plans are administered. The Board believes that the policies and practices described in the CD&A are effective in achieving the Company’s goals. In furtherance of these goals, among other things, our compensation programs have been designed so that a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation is tied not only to how well he performs individually, but also, where applicable, is “at risk” based on how well the Company performs relative to applicable financial objectives. We also believe that equity incentives are aligned with our core objectives of aligning the long-term interests of our executives with those of our stockholders, attracting and retaining key leaders, and rewarding sustained performance and leadership excellence. In addition, equity incentives are often necessary to induce highly qualified individuals, such as William W. Lovette, to join the Company. Accordingly, the Board recommends that you vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the CD&A, the compensation tables and any related material disclosed in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED in a non-binding vote.”

The advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding, meaning that our Board will not be obligated to take any compensation actions, or to adjust our executive compensation programs or policies, as a result of the vote. Notwithstanding the advisory nature of the vote, the resolution will be considered passed with the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy and eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting.

The Company’s current policy is to provide stockholders with an opportunity to approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers each year at the annual meeting of stockholders. It is expected that the next such vote will occur at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation. Proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise.



## PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION OF THE TERMS OF THE PERFORMANCE GOALS
ESTABLISHED FOR THE PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION SHORT-TERM MANAGEMENT
INCENTIVE PLAN

Effective September 15, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Management Incentive Plan (the “STIP”) and the terms of the performance goals established thereunder. The STIP was approved by the stockholders of the Company on December 1, 2009 and by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, pursuant to a joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization pursuant to Section 1121(a) of the United States Code, on December 10, 2009. The STIP is designed to advance the interests of the Company and its stockholders by establishing a direct relationship between the payment of bonuses to certain of the officers and other employees of the Company or its affiliates in order to enhance stockholder value.

Stockholder approval of the material terms of the STIP permits the Company to deduct, for federal income tax purposes, certain performance-based compensation over $1,000,000 paid to certain of the officers under the STIP. The material terms of the performance goals for the awards under the STIP must be disclosed to, and approved by, the stockholders every five years in order to permit the Company to continue to deduct fully for tax purposes the incentive awards paid under the STIP. If these terms of the STIP are approved, performance-based compensation over $1,000,000 that is paid under and in accordance with the STIP and Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) will have the opportunity to be deductible for fiscal year 2014.

The Company is submitting the STIP for the stockholders to ratify and approve the material terms of the performance goals under the STIP, which terms were last approved in 2009. On December 11, 2013 the Board of Directors approved the STIP and the terms of the performance goals thereunder and determined to submit the STIP and the terms of the performance goals to the stockholders for ratification and approval.

The performance goals, which, for purposes of awards to participants that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, must be objectively determinable and substantially uncertain at the time they are established, will be set by the Compensation Committee. Depending on the performance criteria used to establish the performance goals, the performance goals may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of an affiliate of the Company, or division or business unit of the Company or an affiliate. The performance goals must be based on one or more of the following performance criteria, any of which may be measured in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to the results of a peer group. The following performance criteria may be considered for purposes of awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code: revenue; earnings or net earnings (including earnings before or after any one or more of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring costs or rental expenses); sales; economic value-added; cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow); cash flow return on capital; earnings per share of the Common Stock (including earnings before any one or more of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization); return on equity; return on capital; total stockholder return; return on invested capital; return on assets or net assets; return on sales; income or net income (either before or after taxes); operating earnings; operating income or net operating income; operating profit or net operating profit; operating or net profit margin; cost reductions or savings or expense management; funds from operations; appreciation in the fair market value of shares of Common Stock; working capital; market share; productivity; expense; operating efficiency; customer satisfaction; and safety record.

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid during the Company’s taxable year to the chief executive officer or to any employee whose total compensation for the taxable year is required to be reported to stockholders in the proxy statement by reason of such employee being among the four highest compensated officers for the taxable year (other than the chief executive officer and chief financial officer) unless the compensation is performance-based and paid pursuant to a plan approved by the stockholders. The STIP is intended to allow the Compensation Committee to pay benefits that qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Board of Directors is submitting the STIP and the material terms of the performance goals thereunder to the stockholders for ratification and approval because stockholder ratification and approval is required in order to permit full deductibility of all bonus awards under the STIP.



The STIP is administered by the Compensation Committee, which consists of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee has the authority to interpret all provisions of the STIP, to adopt, amend and rescind rules pertaining to the administration, interpretation and application of the STIP, to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the STIP and to reduce, in its discretion, the amount of any bonus awards otherwise payable under the STIP. While it is anticipated that the Board will delegate all aspects of administration of the STIP to the Compensation Committee, the STIP provides that the Board of Directors may exercise the rights and duties of the Compensation Committee under the STIP except with respect to matters which under Section 162(m) of the Code are required to be determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors may amend, suspend or terminate the STIP at any time and from time to time. An amendment will be subject to stockholder approval only if such approval is necessary to maintain the STIP in compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors may not modify performance goals or adjustments applicable to any outstanding awards to the extent such modification would cause the award to fail to constitute qualified performance-based compensation.

Regular, full-time salaried employees of the Company or any of its affiliates who, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee, are employees whose performance can contribute to the successful management and financial success of the Company or an affiliate are eligible to be selected by the Compensation Committee as a participant. Because the participants under the STIP are to be determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, it is impossible at this time to indicate the precise number, name or positions of the employees and officers who will receive bonus awards or the amounts of such bonus awards.

Under the STIP, the Compensation Committee may grant bonus awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and awards that are not intended to so qualify. Awards granted under the STIP are payable upon achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. For awards to participants that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, within the earlier of 90 days after commencement of a performance period or the expiration of 25% of the performance period, the Compensation Committee will designate or approve the following in writing in connection with the grant of an award:

- the performance period, which may consist of one or more periods of times, and which may be of varying and overlapping durations;

• objectively determined performance goals applicable to the performance periods; and

• the maximum amount that may be paid upon achievement of the performance goals.

Following completion of each performance period and prior to the distribution of any payment for an award granted under the STIP, the Compensation Committee will determine whether the performance goals for the performance period were satisfied. Awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code will be paid as soon as practicable after the Compensation Committee has certified in writing that the participant has met the applicable performance goals, unless the participant is eligible and authorized to defer receipt of the payment. In the case of awards to participants that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to reduce (but not increase) the amount otherwise payable under an award granted pursuant to the STIP (including a reduction to zero). The maximum aggregate amount that may be paid under all awards granted under the STIP that are intended to constitute performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code to a participant during any fiscal year may not exceed $10,000,000.

At the time of grant, the Compensation Committee may specify one or more objectively determinable adjustments that may be made to one or more of the performance goals. Such adjustments may include or exclude one or more of the following: items that are extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, including one-time or non-recurring items; items related to a change in accounting principles under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"); items related to financing activities; expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives; other non-operating items; items related to acquisitions, including transaction-related charges and amortization; items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during



the performance period; items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business; items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under GAAP; taxes; stock-based compensation; non-cash items; and any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to be appropriate adjustments.

If a participant’s employment with the Company or any of its affiliates is terminated for any reason other than death or disability prior to the end of a performance period, the participant will not have a right to payment with respect to the award, unless expressly authorized by the Compensation Committee and doing so will not have the effect of preventing the award from qualifying as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval and ratification of the terms of the performance goals established for the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Management Incentive Plan. Proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise.



## PROPOSAL 5: APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION OF THE TERMS OF THE PERFORMANCE GOALS ESTABLISHED FOR THE PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Effective September 15, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) and the terms of the performance goals established thereunder. The LTIP was approved by the stockholders of the Company on December 1, 2009 and by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, pursuant to a joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization pursuant to Section 1121(a) of the United States Code, on December 10, 2009. The LTIP is intended to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining the best available personnel and to link the personal interests of the Company’s key employees, consultants and directors to those of the Company’s stockholders by providing such individuals with an incentive to generate superior returns to such stockholders.

Stockholder approval of the material terms of the LTIP permits the Company to deduct, for federal income tax purposes, certain performance-based compensation over $1,000,000 paid to certain of the officers under the LTIP. The material terms of the performance goals for the awards under the LTIP must be disclosed to, and approved by, the stockholders every five years in order to permit the Company to continue to deduct fully for tax purposes the incentive awards paid under the LTIP. If these terms of the LTIP are approved, performance-based compensation over $1,000,000 that is paid under and in accordance with the LTIP and Section 162(m) of the Code will have the opportunity to be deductible for fiscal year 2014.

The Company is submitting the LTIP for the stockholders to ratify and approve the material terms of the performance goals under the LTIP, which terms were last approved in 2009. On December 11, 2013 the Board of Directors approved the performance goals under the LTIP and the terms of the performance goals thereunder and determined to submit the LTIP and the terms of the performance goals to the stockholders for ratification and approval.

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid during the Company’s taxable year to the chief executive officer or to any employee whose total compensation for the taxable year is required to be reported to stockholders in the proxy statement by reason of such employee being among the four highest compensated officers for the taxable year (other than the chief executive officer and chief financial officer) unless the compensation is performance-based and paid pursuant to a plan approved by the stockholders. The LTIP is intended to allow the Compensation Committee to pay benefits that qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Board of Directors is submitting the LTIP and the material terms of the performance goals thereunder to the stockholders for ratification and approval because stockholder ratification and approval is required in order to permit full deductibility of all bonus awards under the LTIP.

Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, the LTIP is administered by the Compensation Committee, which consists of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. While it is anticipated that the Board of Directors will delegate all aspects of administration of the LTIP to the Compensation Committee, the LTIP provides that the Board of Directors may exercise the rights and duties of the Compensation Committee under the LTIP except with respect to matters which under Section 162(m) of the Code are required to be determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to establish, adopt, or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the LTIP, and to interpret the terms of, and any matter arising pursuant to, the LTIP or any award agreement. The Compensation Committee is authorized to determine which eligible individuals are to receive awards under the LTIP, the type or types of award granted, the time or times when such awards are made, exercise price, grant price, purchase price, award restrictions, and vesting schedules. The Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors may amend, suspend or terminate the LTIP and outstanding awards at any time and from time to time, except that no amendment will be effective without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by applicable laws or by the listing standards of the principal exchange on which Common Stock is traded, and amendments to outstanding awards may not materially and adversely impact the rights of a participant without the participant’s prior written consent. The Compensation Committee does not have the authority to accelerate or delay issuance of shares under an award if the acceleration or delay would be considered a deferral of compensation.



under Section 409A of the Code, except to the extent that such acceleration or delay may, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, take effect in a manner that will not cause any person to incur taxes, interest or penalties under Section 409A of the Code.

The LTIP provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation, performance share awards, performance stock units, dividend equivalent rights, restricted stock units, performance bonus awards and other awards described in the LTIP. Performance-based awards include awards other than options or stock appreciation rights that comply with IRS requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code for performance-based compensation. The individuals eligible to participate in the LTIP include the Company’s officers and other employees, directors and any consultants hired by the Company, as well as employees, directors of the boards of, and any consultants to, the Company’s affiliates, except that only employees of the Company or its subsidiaries may be granted incentive stock options. Because the participants under the LTIP are to be determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, it is impossible at this time to indicate the precise number, name or positions of the employees and officers who will receive bonus awards or the amounts of such bonus awards.

The performance goals, which, for purposes of awards to participants that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, must be objectively determinable and substantially uncertain at the time they are established, will be set by the Compensation Committee. Depending on the performance criteria used to establish the performance goals, the performance goals may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of an affiliate of the Company, or division or business unit of the Company or an affiliate or the performance of an individual. The following performance criteria may be considered for purposes of awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code: revenue; earnings or net earnings (including earnings before or after any one or more of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization); sales; economic value-added; cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow); cash flow return on capital; earnings per share of Common Stock (including earnings before any one or more of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring costs or rental expenses); return on equity; return on capital; total stockholder return; return on invested capital; return on assets or net assets; return on sales; income or net income (either before or after taxes); operating earnings; operating income or net operating income; operating profit or net operating profit; operating or net profit margin; cost reductions or savings or expense management; funds from operations; appreciation in the fair market value of shares of Common Stock; working capital; market share; productivity; expense; operating efficiency; customer satisfaction; and safety record. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may, to the extent consistent with, and within the time prescribed by, Section 162(m) of the Code, appropriately adjust or modify the calculation of performance goals for such performance period in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants (1) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event, or development, or (2) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions.

Under the LTIP, the Compensation Committee may grant awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and awards that are not intended to so qualify. Awards granted under the LTIP are payable upon achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. For awards to participants that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, within the earlier of 90 days after commencement of any fiscal year in question or any other designated fiscal period or period of service or the expiration of 25% of the applicable performance period, the Compensation Committee will designate or approve the following in writing in connection with the grant of an award:

- the performance period, which may consist of one or more periods of times, and which may be of varying and overlapping durations;

• objectively determined performance goals applicable to the performance periods; and

• the maximum amount that may be paid upon achievement of the performance goals.



Following the completion of each performance period, the Committee shall certify in writing whether the applicable performance goals have been achieved for such performance period. In the case of awards to participants that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to reduce or eliminate (but not increase) the amount otherwise payable under an award granted pursuant to the LTIP (including a reduction to zero), if in its sole and absolute discretion, such reduction or elimination is appropriate. For all awards granted under the LTIP that are intended to constitute performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to one or more awards that may be granted to any one participant during any fiscal year is 5,000,000 shares and the maximum amount that may be paid in cash during any fiscal year with respect to any award is $10,000,000.

An award granted pursuant to the LTIP shall only be exercisable or payable while the participant is an employee of the Company or an affiliate of the Company. However, the Compensation Committee in its sole and absolute discretion may provide that an award may be exercised or paid subsequent to a termination of employment or service, as applicable, or following a Change in Control (as defined in the LTIP) of the Company, or because of the participant's retirement, death or disability, or otherwise. Any such provision with respect to an award intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code shall be subject to the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval and ratification of the terms of the performance goals established for the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan. Proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise.



# CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

## Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has the responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and for monitoring our overall performance, but it is not involved in our day-to-day operating decisions. Members of the Board are informed of our business through discussions with the Chief Executive Officer and other officers, and through their review of analyses and reports sent to them each month, as well as through participation in Board and committee meetings.

## Board of Directors Independence

Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each of David E. Bell, Michael L. Cooper, Charles Macaluso, Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes and Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) and is independent within the meaning of our Corporate Governance Policy’s categorical independence standards and the rules for companies traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”).

## Committees of the Board of Directors

To assist in carrying out its duties, the Board of Directors has delegated certain authority to the Audit, Compensation, JBS Nominating and Equity Nominating Committees. Each committee of the Board meets to examine various facets of our operations and take appropriate action or make recommendations to the Board of Directors.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee members include Michael L. Cooper (Chairman), Charles Macaluso and Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior. Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities include selecting our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the plan and results of the audit performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and the adequacy of our systems of internal accounting controls, and monitoring compliance with our conflicts of interest and business ethics policies. The Audit Committee is composed entirely of Directors who the Board of Directors has determined to be independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ standards and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate for purposes of the applicable standards of NASDAQ (“financially literate”) and Michael L. Cooper is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee has an Audit Committee Charter, which is available on our website at www.pilgrims.com, under the “Investors - Corporate Governance” caption.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee members include Wesley Mendonça Batista (Chairman), Michael Cooper and Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior. Our Compensation Committee reviews our remuneration policies and practices and establishes the salaries of our officers. The Compensation Committee does not have a Charter.

Special Nominating Committees. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, the Board has two Special Nominating Committees, which include the JBS Nominating Committee and the Equity Nominating Committee. The JBS Nominating Committee is required to consist solely of JBS Directors and presently includes Wesley Mendonça Batista (Chairman), Gilberto Tomazoni, Joesley Mendonça Batista, William W. Lovette, Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes and Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior. The Equity Nominating Committee is required to consist solely of all of the Equity Directors and presently includes David E. Bell, Michael L. Cooper and Charles Macaluso.

The JBS Nominating Committee has the exclusive authority to nominate the JBS Directors, fill JBS Director vacancies and select the members of the JBS Nominating Committee. The Equity Nominating Committee has the exclusive authority to nominate the Equity Directors, fill Equity Director vacancies, select the members of the Equity Nominating Committee, and to call a special meeting of stockholders under certain circumstances. The Equity Nominating Committee, acting by majority vote, also has the exclusive right to control the exercise of our rights and remedies under the JBS Stockholders Agreement. Any member or alternate member of the Equity Nominating Committee may be removed only by the approval of a majority of the members of the Equity Nominating Committee.



For so long as JBS USA and its affiliates beneficially own 35% or more of our outstanding common stock, no person may be nominated as an Equity Director by the Equity Nominating Committee if JBS USA reasonably determines that such person (i) is unethical or lacks integrity or (ii) is a competitor or is affiliated with a competitor of the Company. The Equity Directors must satisfy the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, and be financially literate, and, for so long as there are two or more Equity Directors on the Board, at least one Equity Director must qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is used in Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act (or any successor rule).

If JBS USA and its affiliates own at least 50% of our outstanding common stock, at least one JBS Director is required:

• to be an independent director under the NASDAQ listing standards,

• to satisfy the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, and

• to be financially literate.

Each of the Board’s Special Nominating Committees has a Charter, current copies of which are available on our website at www.pilgrims.com, under the “Investors - Corporate Governance” caption.

Our Special Nominating Committees do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any Director candidates recommended by our stockholders. The Board of Directors does not view the establishment of a formal policy in this regard as necessary, given the extent of the ownership of the Company’s common stock by JBS USA and its affiliates and the existing JBS Stockholders Agreement. Further, our Special Nominating Committees do not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying Director nominees. However, the Special Nominating Committees strive to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and perspective such that the Board reflects a diversity of backgrounds and experiences. In addition, the Special Nominating Committees will consider stockholder recommendations for candidates for the Board, which should be sent to Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, Corporate Secretary, 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634.

## Meetings

During the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013, the Board of Directors held five meetings, the Audit Committee held four meetings, the Compensation Committee held one meeting and there were five executive sessions including only non-management Directors. During 2013, each member of the Board of Directors, with the exception of Joesley Mendonça Batista and Gilberto Tomazoni, who was appointed to the Board of Directors in July 2013, attended at least 75% of the number of meetings of the Board and each of the Board committees on which the Director served. Three of our Directors were in attendance at the annual meeting in person. Six of our Directors had prior commitments and were not able to attend our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders. While we do not have a formal policy regarding Director attendance at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage each Director to attend each annual meeting of stockholders.

## Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

The position of our Chairman of the Board and the office of the President and Chief Executive Officer are held by different persons. Our Chairman of the Board is Gilberto Tomazoni, and our President and Chief Executive Officer is William W. Lovette.

We separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. We believe the division of duties is especially appropriate as legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the Board and its committees continue to expand, and it facilitates the appropriate level of communication between the Board of Directors and executive management for Board oversight of the Company and its management.



Because Gilberto Tomazoni, Joesley Mendonça Batista, Wesley Mendonça Batista and William W. Lovette are not independent Directors, the Board will either designate an independent Director to preside at the meetings of the non-management and independent Directors or they will prescribe a procedure by which a presiding Director is selected for these meetings. In the absence of another procedure being adopted by the Board, the person appointed will be the independent Director with the longest tenure on the Board in attendance at the meeting. The Board generally holds meetings of non-management directors four times per year and meetings of independent directors four times per year.

The Company’s management is responsible for the ongoing assessment and management of the risks the Company faces, including risks relating to capital structure, strategy, liquidity and credit, financial reporting and public disclosure, operations and governance. We focus not only on operational risk, but financial and strategic risk as well. These areas of focus include input costs (commodity pricing, live and processed product cost and spoilage), revenue risk (sales price and mix), financial risk (adequate controls, timely and effective reporting systems and other management and governance systems) as well as competitive risks and market trends. We aim to identify, categorize and respond to these risks to manage as much of their impact on our business as possible. The Board oversees management’s policies and procedures in addressing these and other risks. Additionally, each of the Board’s four committees (the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the two Special Nominating Committees) monitor and report to the Board those risks that fall within the scope of such committees’ respective areas of oversight responsibility. For example, the full Board directly oversees strategic risks. The Special Nominating Committees directly oversee risk management relating to Director nominations and independence. The Compensation Committee directly oversees risk management relating to employee compensation, including any risks of compensation programs encouraging excessive risk-taking. Finally, the Audit Committee directly oversees risk management relating to financial reporting, public disclosure and legal and regulatory compliance. The Audit Committee is also responsible for assessing the steps management has taken to monitor and control these risks and exposures and discussing guidelines and policies with respect to the Company’s risk assessment and risk management.

## Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board of Directors, any of its committees, all independent Directors, all non-management Directors, or any one Director serving on the Board by sending written correspondence to the desired person or entity addressed to the attention of our Corporate Counsel at Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634. Communications are distributed to the Board, or to any individual Director, as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication.

## Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Policies

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Policies of the Board of Directors. The full texts of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Policies are posted on our website at www.pilgrims.com, under the “Investors - Corporate Governance” caption. We intend to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

## Controlled Company Exemption

We are a “controlled company” under the NASDAQ listing standards because JBS USA owns or controls over 50% of the voting power for the election of directors of the outstanding common stock as of the Record Date. Accordingly, we take advantage of the exemptions discussed in Rule 5615 of the NASDAQ listing standards.



## REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (the “Company”) has reviewed and discussed with management the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013 (the “Proxy Statement”). Based on our review and discussions, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Compensation Committee

Wesley Mendonça Batista, Chairman

Michael L. Cooper

Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



# COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

## Executive Summary

The following discusses the material elements of the compensation for our principal executive officer and our chief financial officer listed in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 33 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) during our fiscal year ended December 29, 2013. To assist in understanding compensation for 2013, we have included a discussion of our compensation policies and decisions for periods before and after 2013, where relevant. During 2013, the Compensation Committee and the Board had the overall responsibility for approving executive compensation and overseeing the administration of our incentive plans and employee benefit plans.

The Company’s compensation principles are intended to implement our core objectives of aligning the long-term interests of our executives with those of our stockholders, attracting and retaining key leaders, and rewarding sustained performance and leadership excellence. In pursuing these objectives, the Compensation Committee uses certain guiding principles in designing the specific elements of the executive compensation program. These guiding principles and policies are that (i) incentive compensation should represent a significant portion of total compensation; (ii) compensation should be performance-based; (iii) incentive compensation should balance short-term and long-term performance; (iv) compensation levels should be market competitive; and (v) superior performance should be rewarded.

In order to further these guiding principles, the key components of our compensation in 2013 included both (i) cash compensation, in the form of base salaries, cash incentive compensation and bonuses, (ii) long-term equity compensation, in the form of restricted stock and restricted stock units, that vest over time and restricted stock units that are earned and granted, if at all, based on the achievement of financial performance metrics designed to reinforce our business objectives and (iii) other non-cash compensation, such as health and welfare benefits, and certain other limited perquisites and benefits.

The Compensation Committee believes a significant portion of the compensation to our Named Executive Officers should be performance based. The Compensation Committee also believes that our Named Executive Officers’ compensation should be balanced with longer term incentives. Accordingly, a significant portion of the compensation to our Named Executive Officers was awarded in the form of restricted stock and restricted stock units, which vests over time and in performance restricted stock units, which are earned and granted if specific 2013 performance targets are met and vest at the end of a three-year period. The Compensation Committee believes these equity awards more closely align our Named Executive Officers’ incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders, including growing our business and improving the Company’s profitability relative to its peers. For 2013, approximately 74% of the total target compensation of each of our Named Executive Officers was “at risk.”

Additionally, the Company maintains the following policies that support the Company’s “pay-for-performance” principles:

- the restriction of our directors, Named Executive Officers, and other key executive officers from hedging the economic interest in the Company securities that they hold;

- the prohibition of Company personnel, including the Named Executive Officers, from engaging in any short-term, speculative securities transactions, engaging in short sales, buying or selling put or call options, and trading in options (other than those granted by the Company);

- the restriction of our directors, Named Executive Officers, and other key executive officers from pledging the Company securities that they hold; and

- our policy of not having any change-in-control or retirement arrangements with our Named Executive Officers.

Following the end of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee conducts a review of all components of the Company’s compensation program. In conducting its review, the Compensation Committee reviews information related to each Named Executive Officer’s individual performance, total compensation, each of the components of compensation, and the Company’s performance. Accordingly, as new executive officers have not been hired,



our compensation principals and objectives did not significantly change in 2013. At the annual meeting of our stockholders held on April 29, 2011, our stockholders recommended the Company hold an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers annually. After consideration of this recommendation, the Company agreed and will hold an advisory vote on our executive officer compensation every year until the next required vote on frequency of stockholder votes on Named Executive Officer compensation.

## 2013 Executive Compensation Vote

At the 2013 annual meeting only 0.31% of votes present (excludes abstentions and broker non-votes) voted against the 2012 “Say-on-Pay” proposal related to Named Executive Officers. In consideration of the results, the Compensation Committee acknowledged the support received from our stockholders and viewed the results as a confirmation of the Company’s existing executive compensation policies and decisions. Accordingly, we did not change our compensation principles and objectives in 2013 in response to the advisory vote of our stockholders.

## Executive Compensation Principles, Policies and Objectives

The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the principles that underlie our executive compensation program and that guide the design and administration of specific plans, agreements and arrangements for our executives. Our compensation principles are intended to implement our core objectives of attracting key leaders, motivating our executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers, rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence and aligning the long-term interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. Our executive compensation principles and policies, which are established and refined from time to time by the Compensation Committee, are described below:

• Incentive compensation should represent a significant portion of total compensation. A significant portion of our executives’ total compensation should be tied not only to how well they perform individually, but also, where applicable, should be “at risk” based on how well the Company performs relative to applicable financial objectives;

• Compensation should be performance-based. Compensation should be subject to performance-based awards as an executive officer’s range of responsibility and ability to influence the Company’s results increase.

• Incentive compensation should balance short-term and long-term performance. Executive compensation should be linked to building long-term stockholder value while remaining consistent with our business objectives and values. Our executive compensation program addresses this objective by including long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards, such as restricted common stock and restricted stock units, which makes the performance of the Company’s common stock a targeted incentive.

• Compensation levels should be market competitive. Compensation should be competitive in relation to the marketplace. Prior to setting performance goals and target opportunities for our incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee considers market compensation data compiled and prepared by management.

• Superior performance should be rewarded. Outstanding achievement should be recognized. The Board and the Compensation Committee consider the Company’s strategies when identifying the appropriate incentive measures and when assigning individual goals and objectives to the Named Executive Officers and evaluate the individual’s performance against those strategies in setting compensation.

In addition, we believe that our compensation programs for executive officers should be appropriately tailored to encourage employees to grow our business, but not encourage them to do so in a way that poses unnecessary or excessive material risk to us. For 2013, the Compensation Committee believes that our Named Executive Officers' compensation is consistent with our performance and economic and competitive industry conditions, and equity incentives are aligned with our actions to grow our business and improve the Company's profitability relative to its peers. Neither the Compensation Committee nor the Board of Directors retained a compensation consultant in 2013, nor did either use benchmarking of peer groups in setting our Named Executive Officers' compensation for 2013.



## Role of the Compensation Committee and Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing the overall compensation structure, policies and programs of the Company and assessing whether our compensation structure resulted in appropriate compensation levels and incentives for executive management of the Company. The Compensation Committee’s objective is to ensure that the total compensation paid to each executive officer was fair, reasonable, competitive and motivational. The Compensation Committee conducts a review of all compensation for our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, and works with our Chief Executive Officer to evaluate and approve compensation of our executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. Our other Named Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer who supervises the day to day performance of the Chief Financial Officer. Accordingly, the Chief Executive Officer evaluates the Chief Financial Officer’s individual performance against the Company-based performance factors, and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding his compensation. The Compensation Committee strongly considers the compensation recommendations and the performance evaluations by our Chief Executive Officer in making its decisions and any recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to non-CEO compensation.

## Components of Compensation

During 2013, the principal elements of compensation for our executive officers were as follows:

• base salaries;

• bonuses, including annual cash incentive compensation and discretionary bonuses;

- long term incentive compensation, including awards of time vested restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units;

• other compensation consisting primarily of health and welfare benefits; and

• certain limited perquisites and other personal benefits.

Additionally, we provide our executive officers certain severance benefits if the executive is terminated other than for cause, as described below. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that these severance benefits are necessary and advisable to keep executive officers focused on the best interests of the Company at times that may otherwise cause a lack of focus due to personal economic exposure. Further, the Compensation Committee and the Board believes that these severance benefits are necessary and advisable for retentive purposes to provide a measure of support to our Named Executive Officers who may receive offers of employment from competitors that would provide severance benefits. See the “2013 Potential Payments Upon Termination” table for additional information regarding the severance payable to our Named Executive Officers. However, the Company does not provide any change-in-control or retirement arrangements to its Named Executive Officers other than the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) under certain circumstances in the case of a “change in control.”

During 2013, we had agreements relating to the employment of our Named Executive Officers, including William W. Lovette, our current Chief Executive Officer and President, and Fabio Sandri, our Chief Financial Officer, as described below under “Compensation to William W. Lovette” and “Compensation to Fabio Sandri.” Our employment agreement with Mr. Lovette expired on January 14, 2014. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe it is prudent to use these arrangements, as necessary, as a means to attract and/or retain these executives. The Compensation Committee believes that providing employment agreements to executive officers under appropriate circumstances fosters an environment of relative security within which we believe our executives will be able to focus on achieving Company goals.

## Base Salary

We provide our Named Executive Officers and other employees with a base salary to provide a fixed amount of compensation for services during the fiscal year. The base salaries for William W. Lovette and Fabio Sandri were governed by agreements, which are described below under “Compensation to William W. Lovette” and “Compensation to Fabio Sandri.” Base salary increases are subjectively determined by the Compensation Committee for each of the executive officers on an individual basis, taking into consideration an assessment of individual contributions to



Company performance, length of tenure, compensation levels for comparable positions, internal equities among positions and, with respect to executives other than the Chief Executive Officer, the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee approved a 2013 increase recommended by our Chief Executive Office to the base salary of our Chief Financial Officer from $375,000 to $400,000. In approving the increase, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Sandri’s overall performance and the fact that he had not received a salary increase since his appointment as Chief Financial Officer in June 2011. The Board did not elect to increase Mr. Lovette’s annual base salary during 2013.

## Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

Cash incentive awards are determined by the Compensation Committee and granted under the terms of the Company’s Short-Term Management Incentive Plan (the “STIP”). Additionally, we may also provide short-term incentives to executives by awarding annual cash bonuses determined by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis. The bonuses reward achievement of short-term goals and allow us to recognize individual and team achievements. The STIP is an annual incentive program providing for the grant of bonus awards payable upon achievement of specified performance goals. Full-time salaried, exempt employees of the Company and its affiliates who are selected by the administering committee are eligible to participate in the STIP.

As part of developing the Company’s compensation strategy for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013, the Compensation Committee established annual performance goals and target payout amounts for William W. Lovette, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Fabio Sandri, our Chief Financial Officer. In the case of Mr. Lovette, his annual performance goal was established under the STIP and his employment agreement and is based on income (loss) before income taxes as a percentage of the Company’s net revenues (“PBT Margin”). In the case of Fabio Sandri, his annual performance goal and target payout was established under the STIP and was based on PBT Margin as well as his individual performance with respect to certain pre-defined key performance indicators (“KPIs”). The Compensation Committee chose to utilize PBT Margin, as determined based on the Company’s audited financial statements and GAAP as applied on a consistent basis by the Company, in setting performance goals and target payout amounts because PBT Margin has a higher correlation to cash flow and liquidity than EBITDA and because it aligns with the Company’s goals of driving overall operational results.

## Long Term Incentive Compensation

The Board and the Compensation Committee believes that long-term incentive compensation is essential to attracting, retaining and motivating executives. The Board and the Compensation Committee further believe that providing our executives with long-term incentives will align their interests with our stockholders and encourage them to grow and operate the Company’s business with a view towards building long-term stockholder value and improving profitability. The Board and the Compensation Committee also believe that equity awards make the performance of the Company’s common stock a targeted incentive. In furtherance of these objectives we maintain the LTIP, which provides for the grant of a broad range of long-term equity-based and cash-based awards, including performance-based awards. The LTIP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The LTIP provides for the grant of a broad range of long-term equity-based and cash-based awards to the Company’s officers and other employees, members of the Board and any consultants. The equity-based awards that may be granted under the LTIP include “incentive stock options,” within the meaning of the Code, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and other stock based awards. As of December 29, 2013, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the LTIP was 6,585,393 shares and the maximum number of shares with respect to which awards of any and all types may be granted during a calendar year to any participant is limited, in the aggregate, to 5,000,000 shares. The maximum amount that may be paid in cash during any fiscal year with respect to any award (including any performance bonus award) is $10,000,000. Except as may otherwise be provided in any applicable award agreement or other written agreement entered into between the Company and a participant in the LTIP, if a “change in control” occurs and the participant’s awards are not converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor entity, then immediately prior to the change in control the awards will become fully exercisable and all forfeiture restrictions on the awards will lapse. While we do not have a formal stock ownership requirement for our executive officers, we do maintain policies against hedging the economic interest in Company securities, engaging in speculative securities transactions, including short sales, and pledging Company securities.



Based on these considerations, the Compensation Committee determined that an equity award combination consisting of restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) would best serve the Compensation Committee’s goals. The Company has never granted stock options. We have granted equity awards to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at a level in which the Board and the Compensation Committee believe will provide the executives long-term incentives, align their interests with those of our stockholders, meet the Company’s long-term objectives and under appropriate circumstance to induce such executives to join the Company.

On September 6, 2012, the Board approved the 2012 Long Term Incentive Program (the “2012 Program”), which is a component of the LTIP. In furtherance of the Compensation Committee’s objectives, the purpose of the 2012 Program was to provide additional incentives to participants to grow PPC’s business and improve PPC’s profitability relative to its peers as measured by Bank of America’s Monthly Profitability Survey (the “BoA Survey”). Under the 2012 Program, participants received target awards equal to a specified percentage of their base salary. The actual award value was then determined at the end of 2012 based upon PPC’s profitability relative to a specified peer group of companies for 2012 as measured by the BoA Survey. The earned value was awarded in January 2013 to participants as a grant of RSUs. The number of RSUs granted was determined by dividing the earned award value by the average stock price for a share of PPC common stock over the 60-day period ending on July 1, 2012. RSUs granted to each participant will generally vest on December 31, 2014, subject to a participant’s continued employment with PPC through that date and other terms and conditions. Each vested RSU will entitle the participant to receive one share of PPC common stock on January 15, 2015, although, in certain circumstances, vested RSUs may be settled in cash. Mr. Sandri participated in the 2012 Program.

On February 14, 2013, the Board approved a discretionary award of 206,933 RSUs to Mr. Lovette in consideration of his performance during fiscal year 2012 and to better align his incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Board set the value of the RSUs granted to Mr. Lovette at 150% of his base salary multiplied by 1.05. The number of RSUs granted to Mr. Lovette was determined by dividing the award value by the average stock price of the Company’s common stock over the 60-day period ended June 30, 2012.

On February 14, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the 2013 Long Term Incentive Program (the “2013 Program”), which is a component of the LTIP. Similar to that of the 2012 Program, the purpose of the 2013 Program is to provide additional incentives to participants to grow PPC’s business and improve PPC’s profitability relative to its peers as measured by the BoA Survey. Under the 2013 Program, participants received target awards equal to a specified percentage of their base salary, with such awards being converted to RSUs upon the Company’s achievement of the performance goals under the 2013 Program.

The performance criteria used in determining the percentage, if any, of the award target to be converted into RSUs was based on a combination of factors that were measured only in respect of the Company’s performance during 2013. In order for any RSUs to be granted under the 2013 Program, two threshold performance goals based on Company metrics were required to be achieved. First, a minimum two percent (2%) PBT Margin for 2013 was required to be met. Second, at the end of 2013, the Company’s average monthly earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) during 2013, as reported in the BoA Survey, was required to equal or exceed the average monthly EBIT of the fifth (5th) place company in the BoA Survey during 2013. Assuming achievement of these threshold goals under the 2013 Program, the Company would issue RSUs in accordance with the following table (using the BoA Survey):

<table><tr><td>Payout (as a percentage of award target)</td><td>50%</td><td>75%</td><td>100%</td><td>125%</td><td>150%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT delta to average company</td><td>+1.53</td><td>+1.63</td><td>+1.73</td><td>+1.83</td><td>+1.93</td></tr></table>

The number of RSUs granted was determined by dividing the earned award value by the average stock price for a share of PPC common stock over the 60-day period ending on February 14, 2013. The earned award value equals the percentage payout reflected in the table above multiplied by the participant’s base salary. RSUs granted to each participant will generally vest on December 31, 2016, subject to a participant’s continued employment with PPC through that date and other terms and conditions. Each vested RSU will entitle the participant to receive one share of PPC common stock on March 15, 2017, although, in certain circumstances, vested RSUs may be settled in cash. The Company did not achieve one of the threshold goals relating to equaling or exceeding the average monthly EBIT of the fifth (5th) place company in the BoA Survey during 2013 that was required for the distribution of RSU awards under the 2013 Program. If that threshold goal was achieved, the Company’s EBIT delta when compared with the



average company in the BoA Survey, as measured by reference to the table above, would have resulted in an award payout of approximately 150% of each participant's target award. After considering this as well as the Company's overall strong financial performance in 2013, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary awards based on parameters identical to those in the 2013 Program at 100% of the target award level. The discretionary awards were distributed in February 2014 to participants as a grant of RSUs. Both Named Executive Officers participated in the 2013 Program and received the discretionary awards.

## Other Compensation

Our Named Executive Officers receive no special employee benefits. During 2013, our Named Executive Officers were eligible to participate on the same basis as other employees in the Company’s 401(k) salary deferral plan (the “401(k) Plan”). Contributions to the 401(k) Plan are made up of a 30% matching contribution on the first 6% of pay to the extent such contributions are not in excess of the Code limits on contributions to 401(k) plans. Under the 401(k) Plan, the Company may make additional matching contributions or other profit sharing contributions at its discretion. There were no discretionary contributions in 2013. We do not have any other pension plan for our Named Executive Officers. In 2013, Mr. Sandri participated in the 401(k) Plan.

We continue to maintain the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) to help provide for the long-term financial security of our US employees who meet the Internal Revenue Service definition of a “highly compensated employee,” which includes all of our Named Executive Officers and certain other key personnel. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants may elect to defer up to 80% of their base salary and/or up to 100% of their annual cash bonus payments as part of their personal retirement or financial planning. Highly compensated employees who elect to defer compensation in the Deferred Compensation Plan must do so annually prior to the beginning of each calendar year and may direct the investment of the amount deferred and retained by us. The Deferred Compensation Plan is administered by the administrative committee appointed by our Board, and deferred compensation may be invested in authorized funds which are similar to the investment options available under our 401(k) Plan. In 2013, neither of our Named Executive Officers participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

We also provide a variety of health and welfare programs to all eligible employees to offer employees and their families protection against catastrophic loss and to encourage healthy lifestyles. The health and welfare programs we offer include medical, wellness, pharmacy, dental, vision, life insurance and accidental death and disability. Our Named Executive Officers generally are eligible for the same benefit programs on the same basis as our other domestic employees.

## Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

During 2013, we provided our Named Executive Officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we believed to be reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain competent executives for key positions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits that we provide to our Named Executive Officers. During 2013, our executive officers were eligible to receive company-paid or company-subsidized life insurance and disability coverage on the same basis as our other domestic payroll employees. Information regarding these perquisites is reported below in the Summary Compensation Table. In establishing the total compensation of the executive officers, the Compensation Committee considered all perquisites and other personal benefits. The Compensation Committee considered these perquisites and other personal benefits as essential and consistent with market practice in order to induce each of Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri to join and remain with the Company.

## Compensation to William W. Lovette

On January 14, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lovette (the “Lovette Employment Agreement”), which expired in accordance with its terms on January 14, 2014. Mr. Lovette brings more than 30 years of industry leadership experience to the Company. In order to attract someone with Mr. Lovette’s significant industry-specific experience, the Compensation Committee decided that it was necessary to offer an employment agreement to Mr. Lovette as an inducement for him to join the Company. The terms of the Lovette Employment Agreement were negotiated directly between certain members of the Board and Mr. Lovette and were approved by



the Compensation Committee. The terms were in part influenced by the terms of his compensation at his previous employer. The Compensation Committee structured the Lovette Employment Agreement so that a significant amount of Mr. Lovette’s annual compensation would be tied to both the performance of the Company and his individual performance, and therefore, would be “at risk.” In addition, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Lovette time-vesting restricted stock immediately upon joining the Company and RSUs based on the achievement of performance conditions to better align his incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. As a result, for 2013, approximately 74% of his total target compensation was “at risk.” Consistent with the Company’s compensation policy, the Lovette Employment Agreement does not provide for any change-in-control or retirement arrangements.

## Base Salary and Annual Incentive Compensation

Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette received an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. The Board did not elect to increase Mr. Lovette’s annual base salary during 2013. During the term of the agreement, Mr. Lovette was eligible to earn an annual cash bonus. Accordingly, Mr. Lovette’s individual performance targets and bonus for 2013 were established under the STIP as follows:

<table><tr><td>2013 PBT Margin</td><td>Bonus Amount</td></tr><tr><td>3% (Threshold)</td><td>$500,000</td></tr><tr><td>4% (Target)</td><td>$1,000,000</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than 4% up to 6%</td><td>$1,000,000 plus 0.5% (i.e., .005) of the excess PBT above 4%</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than 6%</td><td>$1,000,000 plus 0.5% (i.e., .005) of the excess PBT above 4% up to 6% plus .75% (i.e., .0075) of the excess PBT above 6%</td></tr></table>

For purposes of Mr. Lovette’s bonus, PBT Margin for 2013 was determined by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Company’s audited financial statements and GAAP as applied on a consistent basis by the Company. For 2013, the maximum bonus Mr. Lovette could receive was $10,000,000. Following the end of 2013, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s PBT Margin for 2013, which totaled 6.824%. Consequently, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Lovette a bonus of $2,361,506 for 2013.

## Long-Term Incentive Compensation

On February 14, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved a discretionary award of 206,933 RSUs, equal to a value of $1,575,000, to Mr. Lovette as compensation for his performance during fiscal year 2012 and to better align his incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee set the value of the RSUs granted to Mr. Lovette at 150% of his base salary multiplied by 1.05. The number of RSUs granted to Mr. Lovette was determined by dividing the award value by the average stock price of the Company's common stock over the 60 day period ended June 30, 2012. The RSUs granted will generally vest on the earliest of (i) December 31, 2014, subject to Mr. Lovette's continued employment with the Company through such date, (ii) Mr. Lovette's death, or (iii) termination of his employment by the Company without cause. Each vested RSU will entitle Mr. Lovette to receive one share of the Company's common stock on January 15, 2015. Upon the occurrence of specified events, vested RSUs may be settled in cash. The other terms and conditions of the RSUs are substantially consistent with those of the 2012 Program.

On February 14, 2013, Mr. Lovette was granted a target award of 120,919 RSUs under the 2013 Program. Following the end of 2013, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance in respect of the threshold goals under the 2013 Program and determined that the Company did not achieve one of those goals relating to equaling or exceeding the average monthly EBIT of the fifth (5th) place company in the BoA Survey during 2013 that was required for the distribution of RSU awards under the 2013 Program. For the reasons described above, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary awards at 100% of the target award level based on parameters identical to those in the 2013 Program. The discretionary awards were distributed in February 2014 to participants as a grant of RSUs. As a result, the Board made a discretionary grant to Mr. Lovette of 120,919 RSUs. The RSUs granted



to Mr. Lovette will vest on December 31, 2016, subject to his continued employment with the Company through that date and other terms and conditions. Each vested RSU will entitle Mr. Lovette to receive one share of the Company’s common stock on March 15, 2017, although, in certain circumstances, vested RSUs may be settled in cash.

## Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette is entitled to participate in the Company’s savings and retirement plans, practices and programs generally available to the Company’s senior officers. Mr. Lovette is also eligible to participate in all group benefits plans and programs the Company has established or may establish for its executive employees, including the Company’s executive relocation policy and repayment agreement, which provides moving and other relocation related expenses, including assistance selling a home and temporary housing. Any amounts under the executive relocation policy and repayment agreement must be repaid if employment is terminated within one year from the hire date.

## Severance Payments

The Lovette Employment Agreement expired on January 14, 2014. Prior to its expiration, the Lovette Employment Agreement could be terminated at any time by the Company. If the Company had terminated Mr. Lovette other than for “cause” during the term of his agreement, the Company would have been required to continue to pay him his base salary for two years following such termination, subject to certain requirements, including the delivery of a customary release. Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, no other severance or termination payments or benefits would be payable to Mr. Lovette as a result of his termination or resignation of employment, including under the Severance Plan, as described below. Following the expiration of the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette became eligible to participate in the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”). See “Severance Plan” below for a discussion regarding the terms and conditions applicable to the Severance Plan.

## Compensation to Fabio Sandri

Fabio Sandri was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective June 6, 2011. The Compensation Committee structured the terms of Mr. Sandri’s compensation so that a significant amount of Mr. Sandri’s annual compensation would be tied to both the performance of the Company and his individual performance, and therefore, would be “at risk.” As a result, for 2013, approximately 74% of his total target compensation was “at risk.” Consistent with the Company’s compensation policy, the terms of Mr. Sandri’s compensation do not provide for any change-in-control or retirement arrangements other than the vesting of restricted stock granted to him under the LTIP under certain circumstances in the case of a “change in control”.

## Base Salary and Annual Incentive Compensation

Mr. Sandri is provided an annual base salary of $400,000. The Compensation Committee approved a 2013 increase recommended by our Chief Executive Office to the base salary of our Chief Financial Officer from $375,000 to $400,000. In approving the increase, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Sandri’s overall performance and the fact that he had not received a salary increase since his appointment as Chief Financial Officer in June 2011.

For 2013, Mr. Sandri also received an award under the STIP. To be eligible to receive a bonus under the STIP, Mr. Sandri was initially required to achieve an average 360 score of 3 or better. A “360 score” is calculated using the average rating received from direct reports, one’s manager and cross groups using a 1 to 5 rating scale. The 360 review is a behavioral evaluation of how colleagues in business judge an employee’s adherence to the Company’s values.



Following receipt of a satisfactory combined 360 score, Mr. Sandri’s individual bonus opportunity is based primarily on the Company’s PBT Margin, as set forth in the table below. However, the Compensation Committee maintains the discretion to reduce or increase Mr. Sandri’s under the STIP based upon his achievement in respect of individual performance goals measured by certain pre-defined KPIs.

Mr. Sandri’s PBT Margin performance goal target and corresponding bonus funding percentage (as a percentage of his annual base salary at the beginning of 2013) under the STIP were as follows:

<table><tr><td>2013 PBT Margin</td><td>Bonus as % of Base Salary</td></tr><tr><td>1% (Threshold)</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>2%</td><td>50%</td></tr><tr><td>3%</td><td>75%</td></tr><tr><td>4% (Target)</td><td>100%</td></tr><tr><td>5%</td><td>125%</td></tr><tr><td>6%</td><td>150%</td></tr><tr><td>7% (Maximum)</td><td>200%</td></tr></table>

Mr. Sandri’s individual KPIs are listed in the table below.

<table><tr><td>KPI</td><td>Goal</td><td>Weight</td></tr><tr><td>Operating free cash flow equal to or greater than</td><td>$371,000,000</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>Total SG&amp;A costs (including Mexico) equal to or less than</td><td>$172,000,000</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>Days sales outstanding of</td><td>14.5 days</td><td>10%</td></tr><tr><td>Top-third company (4th quarter of the BoA Survey)</td><td>Top-third Company</td><td>10%</td></tr><tr><td>Total finance area costs equal to or less than</td><td>$17,000,000</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Lead refinancing strategy (term loan: revolving loan)</td><td>n/a</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>Improve terms on grain purchases</td><td>n/a</td><td>10%</td></tr><tr><td>Develop talent</td><td>n/a</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Lead strategy development process</td><td>n/a</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Implement pricing metrics / strategy</td><td>n/a</td><td>5%</td></tr></table>

For purposes of Mr. Sandri’s bonus the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Sandri received a satisfactory combined 360 score. In addition, PBT Margin for 2013 was determined by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Company’s audited financial statements and GAAP as applied on a consistent basis by the Company. For 2013, the maximum bonus Mr. Sandri could receive was $750,000. Following the end of 2013, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s PBT Margin for 2013, which totaled 6.824%, and also determined that Mr. Sandri had met each of his KPIs. Consequently, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Sandri a bonus of $548,625 for 2013.



In September 2012, the Compensation Committee established a target long-term incentive opportunity comprised of a RSU award to Mr. Sandri, which was earned based on the achievement of performance conditions and granted under the 2012 Program. The RSU grant was subject to the below payout amounts, which is expressed as a percentage of Mr. Sandri’s base salary:

<table><tr><td colspan="2">Payout Targetas % of Base Salary</td><td>Performance Target</td></tr><tr><td>0%(Below Threshold)</td><td colspan="2">If the Company ended 2012 with more than a negative 1.04 average annual EBIT delta relative to average EBIT for all companies in the BoA Survey based on the reported results in the BoA Survey for the 12 months in 2012.</td></tr><tr><td>50%(Threshold)</td><td colspan="2">If the Company:</td></tr><tr><td>100%(Target)</td><td colspan="2">Achieved a negative 1.04 or better average annual EBIT delta relative to average EBIT for all companies in the BoA Survey based on the reported results in the BoA Survey for the 12 months in 2012; but Did not achieve a fourth quarter average EBIT delta of at least 0 based on the reported results in the BoA Survey for October through December 2012 relative to the annual average EBIT for all companies in the BoA Survey.</td></tr><tr><td>150%(Maximum)</td><td colspan="2">If the Company:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Achieved a negative 1.04 or better (but less than 0.52) average EBIT delta relative to average EBIT for all companies in the BoA Survey based upon the reported results in the BoA Survey for the 12 months in 2012; and Achieved a fourth quarter average EBIT delta of 0 or better based upon the reported results in the BoA Survey for October through December 2012 relative to the annual average EBIT for all companies in the BoA Survey.</td></tr></table>

In February 2013, the Compensation Committee concluded that the Company achieved a combined third and fourth quarter average EBIT delta of less than 0 relative to average EBIT for all companies in the BoA Survey based upon the results reported in the BoA Survey for October through December of 2012. The actual EBIT of the Company for 2012 was $256,590,185. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee set the value of the earned RSUs granted to Mr. Sandri at 105% of his base salary and awarded Mr. Sandri 77,612 RSUs equal to a value of approximately $590,625. The number of RSUs granted to Mr. Sandri were determined by dividing the award value by the average price of the Company’s common stock over the trading days in the 60-day period ended June 30, 2012, which was $7.61. The RSUs granted will generally vest on the earliest of (i) December 31, 2014, subject to Mr. Sandri’s continued employment with the Company through such date, (ii) Mr. Sandri’s death, or (iii) termination of his employment by the Company without cause. Each vested RSU will entitle Mr. Sandri to receive one share of the Company’s common stock on January 15, 2015. Upon the occurrence of specified events, vested RSUs may be settled in cash.



On February 19, 2013, Mr. Sandri was granted a target award of 45,345 RSUs under the 2013 Program. Following the end of 2013, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance in respect of the threshold goals under the 2013 Program and determined that the Company did not achieve one of the threshold goals relating to equaling or exceeding the average monthly EBIT of the fifth (5th) place company in the BoA Survey during 2013 that was required for the distribution of RSU awards under the 2013 Program. For the reasons described above, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary awards at 100% of the target award level based on parameters identical to those in the 2013 Program. The discretionary awards were distributed in February 2014 to participants as a grant of RSUs. As a result, the Compensation Committee made a discretionary grant to Mr. Sandri of 45,345 RSUs. The RSUs granted to Mr. Sandri will vest on December 31, 2016, subject to his continued employment with the Company through that date and other terms and conditions. Each vested RSU will entitle Mr. Sandri to receive one share of the Company’s common stock on March 15, 2017, although, in certain circumstances, vested RSUs may be settled in cash.

## Severance Plan

During 2013, we maintained the Severance Plan, pursuant to which we provided severance payments to eligible employees, including certain Named Executive Officers, if their employment was terminated “without cause” (as defined below). The Severance Plan does not cover termination due to death, disability or retirement, termination for cause or termination at the end of the leave of absence that exceeded the maximum permitted by the Company. Under the Severance Plan, in exchange for signing an enforceable waiver and release agreement, upon termination without cause, a Named Executive Officer was entitled to receive as severance pay an amount equal to: one week per year of service with the Company, plus a minimum of 16 supplemental weeks (in addition to years of service amount), with a total maximum of 52 weeks of pay. In addition, if the Company provided less than two weeks notice of termination without cause, an executive officer would have been entitled to up to two additional weeks of severance in lieu of notice. Additional benefits available to eligible employees under the Severance Plan included career transition services as determined by the Company, including without limitation, written materials, company-sponsored training and job fairs. Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette was not entitled to any severance or termination payments or benefits under the Severance Plan. Following the expiration of the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette became eligible to participate in the Severance Plan.

## Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Code imposes limitations on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of compensation over $1,000,000 paid to each of our Named Executive Officers in a taxable year. Compensation above $1,000,000 may only be deducted if it is “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of the Code. Amounts payable under the STIP can be structured to be performance-based compensation meeting these requirements and, as such, has the opportunity to be fully deductible. However, the Company has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. For 2013, certain compensation to Mr. Lovette (including his bonus and RSUs) did not qualify as performance-based compensation and was not deductible.



# EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

## Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes compensation paid to or earned by our Named Executive Officers for 2013, 2012 and 2011, comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, who were serving at December 29, 2013.

<table><tr><td>Name and Principal Position (a)</td><td>Year</td><td>Salary ($)</td><td>Bonus ($)</td><td>Stock Awards (d) ($)</td><td>Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)</td><td>All Other Compensation (b) ($)</td><td>Total ($)</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>2013</td><td>1,000,000</td><td></td><td>1,783,762 (c)</td><td>2,361,506</td><td></td><td>3,050</td></tr><tr><td>Chief Executive Officer and President</td><td>2012</td><td>1,000,000</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>500,000</td><td></td><td>2,223</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>980,769</td><td>250,000</td><td>1,420,000</td><td>500,000</td><td></td><td>24,961</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td>2013</td><td>377,885</td><td></td><td>689,971 (c)</td><td>548,625</td><td></td><td>1,533</td></tr><tr><td>Chief Financial Officer</td><td>2012</td><td>375,000</td><td>—</td><td>363,375</td><td>150,000</td><td></td><td>615</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>221,136</td><td>75,000</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td>20,090</td></tr></table>

(a) William W. Lovette and Fabio Sandri joined the Company in January 2011 and June 2011, respectively.

(b) For 2013, the “All Other Compensation” column includes the following items of compensation:

i. Section 79 income to the named individuals due to group term life insurance in the following amounts: William W. Lovette, $1,242; Fabio Sandri, $393.

ii. The Company reimburses employees for a portion of their long-term disability premium cost. William W. Lovette received $608 for a portion of his long-term disability premium cost.

iii. The Company provides a cell phone stipend to employees to cover business use on personal cell phones. The named individuals received stipends in the following amounts: William W. Lovette, $1,200; Fabio Sandri, $600.

iv. The Company provides matching 401(k) contributions. Fabio Sandri received $540 in matching contributions.

(c) Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri were granted 206,933 and 77,612 RSUs, respectively, in 2013. The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the RSUs as determined in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs awarded to Mr. Lovette at date of grant was $1,783,762 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 26, 2013. The aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs awarded to Mr. Sandri at date of grant was $689,971 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 4, 2013.

(d) In February 2013, Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri received performance-based awards under the 2013 Program that would be settled for RSUs if the awards were earned. At the date of receipt, the outcome of achieving the performance conditions was deemed improbable for purposes of ASC 718. The performance conditions for these awards were not met; however, had the performance conditions been met, the maximum value of these awards would have been $1,101,572 and $413,093 for Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri, respectively. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation to William W. Lovette” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation to Fabio Sandri” for a discussion of the performance conditions.



## 2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

<table><tr><td>Name</td><td>Grant Date</td><td colspan="3">Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td colspan="3">Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards \( ^{(d)} \)</td><td rowspan="2">All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units \( ^{(b)(d)} \)  (#)</td><td rowspan="2">Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards \( ^{(c)(d)} \)  ($)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Threshold (\()</td><td>Target (\))</td><td>Maximum ($)</td><td>Threshold (#)</td><td>Target (#)</td><td>Maximum (#)</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>2/26/2013</td><td>500,000</td><td>1,000,000</td><td>10,000,000</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>206,933</td><td>1,783,762</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3/29/2013</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>60,460</td><td>120,919</td><td>181,379</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td>2/4/2013</td><td>93,750</td><td>375,000</td><td>750,000</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>77,612</td><td>689,971</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3/29/2013</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>22,673</td><td>45,345</td><td>68,018</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr></table>

(a) The amounts reported in these columns reflect the threshold, target and maximum amounts available under the STIP. For Mr. Sandri, threshold, target and maximum amounts under the STIP were determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2013. The threshold and target for Mr. Lovette were established under the terms of the STIP. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation to William W. Lovette” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation to Fabio Sandri” for a discussion of the performance targets. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for determining whether the Company meets its performance targets for a performance period.

(b) Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri received grants of 206,933 and 77,612 RSUs under the LTIP, which are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2014.

(c) The amounts in this column reflect the respective grant date fair values of the RSUs granted to Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri as determined in accordance with ASC 718. The grant date fair value of the RSUs awarded to Mr. Lovette at date of grant was determined by reference to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 26, 2013. The grant date fair value of the RSUs awarded to Mr. Sandri at date of grant was determined by reference to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 4, 2013.

(d) In February 2013, Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri received performance-based awards under the 2013 Program that would be settled for RSUs if the awards were earned. At the date of receipt, the outcome of achieving the performance conditions was deemed improbable for purposes of ASC 718. The performance conditions for these awards were not met and no RSUs were earned. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation to William W. Lovette” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation to Fabio Sandri” for a discussion of the performance conditions.



## 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">Stock Awards</td></tr><tr><td>Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)</td><td>Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)</td><td>Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)</td><td>Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>100,000 \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>1,647,000</td><td>206,933 \( ^{(b)} \)</td><td>3,408,187</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>150,287 \( ^{(c)} \)</td><td>2,475,227</td></tr></table>

(a) As an inducement to Mr. Lovette’s employment with the Company and Mr. Lovette’s execution of the Lovette Employment Agreement, as described below, the Company awarded Mr. Lovette 200,000 restricted shares of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock. The restrictions on 100,000 shares of this stock lapsed on each of January 3, 2013 and January 3, 2014.

(b) Mr. Lovette received a grant of 206,933 shares subject to restricted stock units under the LTIP in February 2013. The restricted stock units are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2014.

(c) Mr. Sandri received a grant of 72,675 shares of restricted stock under the LTIP on August 27, 2012 and 77,612 shares subject to restricted stock units under the LTIP in February 2013. The restricted shares are scheduled to vest on April 27, 2014. The restricted stock units are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2014.



## 2013 Option Exercises and Vested Stock Table

<table><tr><td>Name</td><td>Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)</td><td>Value Realized on Vesting ($)</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>100,000 (a)</td><td>806,000 (b)</td></tr></table>

(a) As an inducement to Mr. Lovette’s employment with the Company and Mr. Lovette’s execution of the Lovette Employment Agreement, in 2011 the Company awarded Mr. Lovette 200,000 restricted shares of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock. The restrictions on 100,000 shares lapsed on January 3, 2013.

(b) The realized value on vesting of the restricted shares of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock awarded to Mr. Lovette was determined by reference to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 3, 2013.



## Lovette Employment Agreement

In December 2010, the Board approved the appointment of Mr. Lovette, as our Chief Executive Officer and President, effective January 3, 2011. On January 14, 2011, we entered into Lovette Employment Agreement. Mr. Lovette brings more than 30 years of industry leadership experience to the Company. In light of Mr. Lovette's significant industry-specific experience, the Compensation Committee decided that it was necessary to offer an employment agreement to Mr. Lovette in order to create an incentive for him to join the Company. The Lovette Employment Agreement expired in accordance with its terms on January 14, 2014.

## Base Salary and Incentive Compensation

Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette received an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. Mr. Lovette’s individual performance targets and bonus opportunity for 2013 under the STIP were as follows:

<table><tr><td>2013 PBT Margin</td><td>Bonus Amount</td></tr><tr><td>3% (Threshold)</td><td>$500,000</td></tr><tr><td>4% (Target)</td><td>$1,000,000</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than 4% up to 6%</td><td>$1,000,000 plus 0.5% (i.e., .005) of the excess PBT above 4%</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than 6%</td><td>$1,000,000 plus 0.5% (i.e., .005) of the excess PBT above 4% up to 6% plus 0.75% (i.e., .0075) of the excess PBT above 6%</td></tr></table>

The maximum bonus payable to Mr. Lovette with respect to 2013 performance was $10,000,000. In 2014, Mr. Lovette received a bonus of $2,361,506 with respect to 2013 performance.

## Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette is entitled to participate in the Company’s savings and retirement plans, practices and programs generally available to other executive personnel of the Company. Mr. Lovette is also eligible to participate in all group benefits plans and programs the Company has established or may establish for its executive employees, including the Company’s executive relocation policy and repayment agreement, which provides moving and other relocation related expenses, including assistance selling a home and temporary housing. Any amounts under the executive relocation policy and repayment agreement must be repaid if employment is terminated within one year from the hire date.

## Restricted Stock Grant

As an inducement to Mr. Lovette’s employment with the Company and Mr. Lovette’s execution of the Lovette Employment Agreement, in 2011 the Company awarded Mr. Lovette 200,000 restricted shares of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock. Restrictions on 100,000 shares of this stock lapsed on each of January 3, 2013 and January 3, 2014.

## Severance Payments

Prior to the expiration of the Lovette Employment Agreement, if the Company terminated Mr. Lovette other than for “cause” during the term of his agreement, the Company would have continued to pay him his base salary for two years following such termination, subject to certain requirements, including the delivery of a customary release. Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, no other severance or termination payments or benefits would have been payable to Mr. Lovette as a result of his termination or resignation of employment, including other severance or termination payments or benefits under the Severance Plan, as described below. Following the expiration of the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette is entitled to participate in the Severance Plan, as described below.



## Sandri Employment Terms

Fabio Sandri was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective June 6, 2011. His appointment was approved by the Board of Directors on June 1, 2011. Mr. Sandri is provided an annual base salary of $400,000 and is eligible to participate in the STIP with a bonus target equal to 100% of his annual base salary. For additional information regarding Mr. Sandri’s bonus award, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Components of Compensation - Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.” Mr. Sandri is also eligible to participate in the Company’s other benefit plans that are generally available to the Company’s senior officers.

## Short-Term Incentive Plan

The Company maintains the STIP, an annual incentive program providing for the grant of bonus awards payable upon achievement of specified performance goals. The STIP permits the grant of awards that are intended to qualify as deductible under section 162(m) of the Code. Full-time salaried, exempt employees of the Company and its affiliates who are selected by the administering committee, in its sole discretion, will be eligible to participate in the STIP. The awards under the STIP may be paid, at the option of the Compensation Committee, in cash, or in the Company's common stock, or in any combination of cash and common stock. The Compensation Committee currently administers the STIP and establishes performance periods under the STIP, which may be of varying and overlapping durations. For each performance period, the Compensation Committee may establish one or more objectively determinable performance goals, based upon one or more of a variety of performance criteria specified in the STIP. In addition, for bonus awards not intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee may establish performance goals based on other performance criteria as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion. For 2013, both Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri participated in the STIP.

For each award under the STIP, the Committee, in its discretion, may make objectively determinable adjustments to one or more of the performance goals. Such adjustments may include or exclude one or more of the following: items that are extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, including one-time or non-recurring items; items related to a change in GAAP; items related to financing activities; expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives; other nonoperating items; items related to acquisitions, including transaction-related charges and amortization; items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during the performance period; items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business; items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under GAAP; taxes; stock-based compensation; noncash items; and any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to be appropriate adjustments.

Under the terms of the STIP, the maximum aggregate amount of all awards intended to constitute qualified performance-based compensation granted to a participant with regard to any fiscal year will not exceed $10,000,000.

## Long Term Incentive Plan, 2012 Long Term Incentive Program and 2013 Long Term Incentive Program

The Company maintains the LTIP. The LTIP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The LTIP provides for the grant of a broad range of long-term equity-based and cash-based awards to the Company’s officers and other employees, members of the Board and any consultants. The equity-based awards that may be granted under the LTIP include “incentive stock options,” within the meaning of the Code, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, RSUs and other stock based awards. As of December 29, 2013, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the LTIP was 6,585,393 shares and the maximum number of shares with respect to which awards of any and all types may be granted during a calendar year to any participant is limited, in the aggregate, to 5,000,000 shares. The maximum amount that may be paid in cash during any fiscal year with respect to any award (including any performance bonus award) is $10,000,000. Except as may otherwise be provided in any applicable award agreement or other written agreement entered into between the Company and a participant in the LTIP, if a “change in control” occurs and the participant’s awards are not converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor entity, then immediately prior to the change in control the awards will become fully exercisable and all forfeiture restrictions on the awards will lapse.



Under the LTIP, a “change in control” generally includes (i) a direct or indirect sale or other disposition of the Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in one transaction or series of transactions, (ii) the consummation of any transaction (including a merger) to which the Company is a party the result of which is that immediately after such transaction the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such transaction hold less than 50.1% of the total voting power generally entitled to vote in the election of directors of the person surviving such transaction, (iii) any “person” or “group” becomes the ultimate “beneficial owner” (each as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of more than 50% of the total voting power generally entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company on a fully diluted basis, (iv) subject to specified exceptions and qualifications, during any two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the members of the Board cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the members of the Board then in office, or (v) the adoption of a plan for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

On September 6, 2012, the Board approved the 2012 Program, which is a component of the LTIP. The purpose of the 2012 Program is to provide additional incentives to participants to grow the Company's business and improve the Company's profitability. Under the 2012 Program, participants receive target awards equal to a specified percentage of their base salary. The actual award value was then determined at the end of 2012 based upon the Company's profitability relative to a specified peer group of companies for 2012. The earned value was awarded in February 2013 to participants as a grant of RSUs. The number of RSUs granted was determined by dividing the earned award value by the average price of the Company's common stock over the trading days in the 60-day period ending on July 1, 2012, which was $7.61. RSUs granted to each participant will generally vest on December 31, 2014; provided, a participant shall immediately forfeit any outstanding RSUs if the participant's employment with the Company ends before the vesting date for any reason other than (i) a termination without cause (as defined in the 2012 Program) or (ii) the participant's death. If a participant's employment is terminated by the Company without cause or the participant dies while employed with the Company, then the outstanding RSUs granted to the participant will remain outstanding and will be paid to the participant (or, in the event of death, to the participant's estate) on January 15, 2015. Each vested RSU will entitle the participant to receive one share of Pilgrim's Pride common stock on January 15, 2015, although, in certain circumstances, vested RSUs may be settled in cash. If a "change in control" or privatization of the Company occurs, then RSUs that are not converted, assumed or replaced by a successor entity shall, if the date of the change in control or privatization occurs on or after the date such RSUs are granted, be converted to a cash amount on the date of the change in control or privatization and the Company shall pay such resulting cash amount to the participant in cash on January 15, 2015, subject to the vesting and forfeiture provisions set forth in the 2012 Program and the applicable award agreement. In the event of a change in control, the RSUs shall be converted to a cash amount based upon the highest price paid for a share of the Company's common stock in the change in control. In the event of a privatization, the RSUs will be converted to a cash amount on the date of privatization equal to the closing price (or average closing price) on the applicable stock exchange on which the Company's common stock is traded on a date (or dates) prior to the privatization, as specified by the Compensation Committee. Generally, a privatization means the acquisition by JBS S.A., alone or in combination with one of its affiliates, of 100% of the common stock of the Company.

On February 14, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the 2013 Program, which is a component of the LTIP. Similar to that of the 2012 Program, the purpose of the 2013 Program is to provide additional incentives to participants to grow PPC's business and improve PPC's profitability relative to its peers as measured by the BoA Survey. Under the 2013 Program, participants received target awards equal to a specified percentage of their base salary, with such awards being converted to RSUs upon the Company's achievement of the performance goals under the 2013 Program. The performance criteria used in determining the percentage, if any, of the award target to be converted into RSUs was based on a combination of factors that were measured only in respect of the Company's performance during 2013. In order for any RSUs to be granted under the 2013 Program, two threshold performance goals based on Company metrics were required to be achieved. First, a minimum two percent (2%) PBT Margin for 2013 was required to be met. Second, at the end of 2013, the Company's average monthly EBIT during 2013,



as reported in the BoA Survey, was required to equal or exceed the average monthly EBIT of the fifth (5th) place company in the BoA Survey during 2013. Assuming achievement of these threshold goals under the 2013 Program, the Company would issue RSUs in accordance with the following table (using the BoA Survey):

<table><tr><td>Payout (as a percentage of award target)</td><td>50%</td><td>75%</td><td>100%</td><td>125%</td><td>150%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT delta to average company</td><td>+1.53</td><td>+1.63</td><td>+1.73</td><td>+1.83</td><td>+1.93</td></tr></table>

The Company did not achieve one of the threshold goals relating to equaling or exceeding the average monthly EBIT of the fifth (5th) place company in the BoA Survey during 2013 that was required for the distribution of RSU awards under the 2013 Program. If that threshold goal was achieved, the Company’s EBIT delta when compared with the average company in the BoA Survey, as measured by reference to the table above, would have resulted in an award payout of approximately 150% of each participant’s target award. After considering this as well as the Company’s overall strong financial performance in 2013, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary awards based on parameters identical to those in the 2013 Program at 100% of the target award level. The discretionary awards were distributed in February 2014 to participants as a grant of RSUs. The number of RSUs granted was determined by dividing the earned award value by the average stock price for a share of PPC common stock over the 60-day period ending on February 14, 2013. RSUs granted to each participant will generally vest on December 31, 2016, subject to a participant’s continued employment with PPC through that date and other terms and conditions. Each vested RSU will entitle the participant to receive one share of PPC common stock on March 15, 2017, although, in certain circumstances, vested RSUs may be settled in cash. Both Named Executive Officers participated in the 2013 Program and received the discretionary awards.

## 401(k) Salary Deferral Plan

Our executive officers receive no special employee benefits. During 2013, our executive officers were eligible to participate on the same basis as other employees in the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Contributions to the 401(k) Plan are made up of a 30% matching contribution on the first 6% of pay to the extent such contributions are not in excess of the Code limits on contributions to 401(k) plans. Under the 401(k) Plan, the Company may make additional matching contributions or other profit sharing contributions at its discretion. There were no discretionary contributions in 2013. All full-time employees in the U.S. are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. We do not have any other pension plan for our executive officers. In 2013, Mr. Sandri was the only Named Executive Officer who participated in the Company’s 401(k) Plan.



## 2013 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

The information below describes certain compensation that would be paid to William W. Lovette, our Chief Executive Officer, and Fabio Sandri, our Chief Financial Officer, in the event of a termination of their respective employment with the Company or under certain circumstances in the event of a change in control of the Company. Neither Named Executive Officer would receive any payments or benefits upon termination for cause. The Company also has no arrangements under which the Named Executive Officers would receive any payments or benefits upon a change in control of the Company other than immediate vesting under certain circumstances of restricted stock and RSUs granted to Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri under the LTIP. The amounts shown in the table below assume that such a termination of employment occurred on December 29, 2013.

<table><tr><td>Executive Officer / Element of Compensation</td><td>Termination due to Death or Disability \( ^{(a)(d)} \)  (\))</td><td>Termination Other than for Cause, Death or Disability (\))</td><td>Change-in-Control \( ^{(e)} \)  (\))</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>—</td><td>2,000,000</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Severance payment \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>346,154</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Self-insured payments</td><td>346,154</td><td>2,000,000</td><td>3,408,187</td></tr><tr><td>Immediate vesting of RSUs \( ^{(f)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3,408,187</td></tr><tr><td>Total for Mr. Lovette</td><td>346,154</td><td>2,000,000</td><td>3,408,187</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Severance payment \( ^{(b)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>146,154</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Self-insured payments</td><td>138,462</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Immediate vesting of restricted stock \( ^{(c)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,196,957</td></tr><tr><td>Immediate vesting of RSUs \( ^{(f)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,278,270</td></tr><tr><td>Total for Mr. Sandri</td><td>138,462</td><td>146,154</td><td>2,475,227</td></tr></table>

(a) Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, the Company can terminate the agreement at any time. If the Company terminates Mr. Lovette other than for “cause”, as described above, during the term of his agreement, the Company will continue to pay him his base salary for two years following such termination, subject to certain requirements, including the delivery of a customary release. Under the Lovette Employment Agreement, no other severance or termination payments or benefits will be payable to Mr. Lovette as a result of his termination or resignation of employment, including severance or termination payments or benefits under the Severance Plan, as described above. The Lovette Employment Agreement expired in accordance with its terms on January 14, 2014. Following the expiration of the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette is entitled to participate in the Severance Plan, as described below.

(b) Calculated pursuant to the Severance Plan, as described below.
(c) For termination due to death, Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri would also receive $500,000 and $400,000, respectively, from third party insurers.
(d) Mr. Lovette would also receive approximately $15,000 per month in long-term disability payments from third party insurers.
(e) Mr. Sandri received a grant of 72,675 shares of restricted stock under the LTIP. The shares of the restricted stock will vest immediately if a “change-in-control” occurs and the restricted stock is not converted, assumed or replaced by the successor entity. These amounts are calculated assuming that the market price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the event was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013 ($16.47).

(f) Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri received grants of 206,933 and 77,612 RSUs, respectively, under the LTIP. The shares subject to the RSUs will vest immediately if a “change-in-control” occurs and the restricted stock is not converted, assumed or replaced by the successor entity. These amounts are calculated assuming that the market price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the event was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013 ($16.47).

## Severance Plan

During 2013, we maintained the Severance Plan, pursuant to which we provided severance payments to eligible employees, including certain Named Executive Officers, if their employment was terminated “without cause.” For the purposes of the Severance Plan, termination “for cause” means termination of employment because of (i) negligence or misconduct by the individual in the performance of his/her duties for the Company, (ii) non-performance by the individual of his/her duties for the Company, (iii) the individual’s conviction for or admission of a felony offense, or the individual’s indictment for a criminal offense involving or relating to the business of the Company, (iv) excessive tardiness or absenteeism pursuant to Company policies, (v) act of fraud, dishonesty, or



embezzlement by the individual with respect to the Company, or (vi) misconduct by the individual, which, in the judgment of the Company, brings the reputation of the Company into disrepute or causes the individual to be unable to perform his/her duties.

The Severance Plan does not cover termination due to death, disability or retirement, termination for cause or termination at the end of the leave of absence that exceeded the maximum permitted by the Company. Under the Severance Plan, in exchange for signing an enforceable waiver and release agreement, upon termination without cause, a Named Executive Officer was entitled to receive as severance pay an amount equal to: one week per year of service with the Company, plus a minimum of 16 supplemental weeks (in addition to years of service amount), with a total maximum of 52 weeks of pay. In addition, if the Company provided less than two weeks notice of termination without cause, an executive officer would have been entitled up to two additional weeks of severance in lieu of notice. Additional benefits available to eligible employees under the Severance Plan included career transition services as determined by the Company, including without limitation, written materials, company sponsored training and job fairs. Mr. Sandri is an eligible participant under the Severance Plan. During the term of the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette was not entitled to any severance or termination payments or benefits under the Severance Plan. Following the expiration of the Lovette Employment Agreement, Mr. Lovette is also entitled to participate in the Severance Plan.

## Compensation Risks

The Company has reviewed and assessed our compensation policies and practices to determine whether they are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company’s management reviews compensation policies for the presence of certain elements that could encourage employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks; the ratios and level of incentive to fixed compensation, annual to long-term compensation and cash to equity compensation; and the comparison of compensation expense to earnings of the Company. Management’s assessment of the Company’s compensation policies is reviewed by the Compensation Committee as part of its risk oversight function.

The Company believes that its compensation programs for employees and executive officers are appropriately tailored to encourage employees to grow our business, but not to encourage them to do so in a way that poses unnecessary or excessive material risk. In particular, in 2013, the Company’s compensation programs were designed to provide the following:

• elements that reward short-term and long-term performance;

- for our executive officers, incentive compensation that rewards performance based on Company performance; and

• compensation with fixed and variable components.

As a result, the Company believes that executive officers and key employees receive a balance between competitive remuneration to encourage retention and compensation designed to provide opportunities to earn more by successfully executing our business strategy. The Company believes the design of these programs encourages our executive officers and key employees to perform at high levels and maximize Company performance without focusing exclusively on compensation performance metrics to the detriment of other important business metrics.

The Company also believes that its compensation program does not encourage excessive risk taking because the above compensation elements coupled with equity ownership in the Company provide a proper mix between long and short-term incentives. A significant portion of the Named Executive Officers’ total compensation is performance-based and tied to the profitability of the Company. Specifically, in 2013, each of Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri were eligible to receive an annual cash bonus payable based on the Company’s PBT Margin. Additionally, Mr. Lovette and Mr. Sandri each has been granted equity awards and currently own a level of equity that the Company believes provides sufficient long-term incentives. The Company believes that the Named Executive Officers’ beneficial ownership of Pilgrim’s Pride common stock, which encourages long-term focus on sustainable performance, aligns their interests with those of our stockholders.



Overall, the Company concluded that there were no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

## Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2013, the members of the Compensation Committee were Wesley Mendonça Batista, Michael L. Cooper and Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior. No member of the Committee was, during 2013, an officer, former officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries. We did not have any compensation committee interlocks in 2013.



## 2013 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our director compensation for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013. Gilberto Tomazoni, Joesley Mendonça Batista, Wesley Mendonça Batista and William W. Lovette did not receive any compensation solely for service as Directors.

<table><tr><td>Director</td><td>Fees Earned or Paid in Cash</td><td>All Other Compensation \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>David E. Bell</td><td>$ 147,500</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 147,500</td></tr><tr><td>Michael L. Cooper</td><td>181,500</td><td>—</td><td>181,500</td></tr><tr><td>Charles Macaluso</td><td>163,500</td><td>—</td><td>163,500</td></tr><tr><td>Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes</td><td>147,500</td><td>15,804</td><td>163,304</td></tr><tr><td>Wallim Cruz Vasconcellos Junior</td><td>176,500</td><td>18,750</td><td>195,250</td></tr></table>

(a) Reflects U.S. federal taxes paid by the Company on behalf of Dr. Pratini and Mr. Vasconcellos.

Under the Company’s current compensation program for Directors (the “Program”), directors who are employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries will not receive any additional compensation for their services as directors. The Program provides that each non-employee Director will receive an annual retainer of $140,000, paid quarterly in arrears, composed of $70,000 in cash with the remainder consisting of either cash or a combination of cash and equity awards to be determined by the Board. During 2013, the entire retainer was paid in cash. In addition, non-employee directors each receive $1,500 per Board meeting they attend in person, plus expenses. The Chairmen of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee each receive $15,000 supplemental annual compensation, and other members of those committees each receive an additional $10,000 per year. The Chairmen of other Board committees each receive $10,000 supplemental annual compensation, with other members of such committees each receiving an additional $5,000 per year. Committee Chairmen and other committee members each also receive $1,500 and $1,000, respectively, per committee meeting they attend in person, plus expenses.



# RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

## Related Party Transactions Policy

During 2013, in accordance with its Charter, our Audit Committee was responsible for reviewing and approving the terms and conditions of all proposed transactions between us and any of our officers or Directors, or relatives or affiliates of any such officers or Directors. Furthermore, our restated certificate of incorporation provides that all transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act (“related party transactions”) must first be reviewed, evaluated and approved by the Audit Committee or other committee comprised solely of independent directors, such approval to be evidenced by a resolution stating that such committee has, in good faith, unanimously determined that such transaction complies with the provisions our certificate of incorporation governing related party transactions. Any Audit Committee or other independent body member who was or is not independent with respect to a related party transaction under review has been required by our Audit Committee Charter to disclose his or her lack of independence to the remaining committee members and abstain from the review and approval of that transaction.

## Certain Transactions

During 2013, we have been a party to certain transactions with our current Directors and executive officers. These transactions, along with all other related party transactions, received the approval of the current Audit Committee or, in the case of transactions entered into prior to our emergence from bankruptcy, the Audit Committee in existence at that time. Company management analyzed the terms of all contracts entered into with related parties and believed that they were substantially similar to, and contained terms not less favorable to us than, those obtainable from unaffiliated parties.

On January 19, 2010, we entered into an agreement with JBS USA in order to allocate costs associated with JBS USA’s procurement of SAP licenses and maintenance services for its combined companies. Under this agreement, the fees associated with procuring SAP licenses and maintenance services are allocated between the Company and JBS USA in proportion to the percentage of licenses used by each company. The agreement expires on the date of expiration, or earlier termination, of each underlying SAP license agreement.

On May 5, 2010, we also entered into an agreement with JBS USA in order to allocate the costs of supporting the business operations by one consolidated corporate team, which have historically been supported by their respective corporate teams. Expenditures paid by JBS USA on behalf of the Company will be reimbursed by the Company, and expenditures paid by the Company on behalf of JBS USA will be reimbursed by JBS USA. This agreement expires on May 5, 2015. During 2013, JBS USA incurred approximately $55,730,240 in expenditures paid on our behalf, including the procurement and maintenance of SAP licenses. During 2013, we incurred approximately $1,733,070 in expenditures paid on behalf of JBS USA.

We routinely enter transactions to purchase products from JBS USA and to sell our products to them. During 2013, our purchases from JBS USA totaled $80,808,507 and our sales to JBS USA totaled $61,942,076.

On June 23, 2011, the Company entered into a Subordinated Loan Agreement with JBS USA (the “Subordinated Loan Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Subordinated Loan Agreement, we agreed to reimburse JBS USA up to $56,500,000 for draws upon any letters of credit issued for JBS USA’s account that support certain obligations of our company or its subsidiaries. JBS USA agreed to arrange for letters of credit to be issued on its account in the amount of $56,500,000 to an insurance company serving the Company in order to allow that insurance company to return cash it held as collateral against potential workers compensation, auto and general liability claims. In return for providing this letter of credit, the Company has agreed to reimburse JBS USA for the letter of credit cost the Company would otherwise incur under its revolving credit agreement. The total amount paid by the Company for 2013 costs, to reimburse JBS USA, was $2,185,905. There remains no other commitment to make advances by JBS USA under the Subordinated Loan Agreement.

William D. Lovette is the son of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President and is employed as the Company’s Head of Operations - Prepared Foods. During fiscal year 2013, his annual cash compensation was $232,975. He was also awarded a target award of 7,860 RSUs under the 2013 Program. William D. Lovette’s employment with the Company was approved by the Audit Committee.



# INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEE INFORMATION

## Changes in Certifying Accountants

Effective March 14, 2012, the Company engaged KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2012 and any interim periods. The decision to change auditors was approved by the Audit Committee and the result of a request for proposal process that involved multiple firms, including Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), and was conducted as part of the Company’s ongoing efforts to enhance its corporate governance practices.

KPMG informed the Company that it completed the prospective client evaluation process on March 14, 2012. On March 8, 2012, the Audit Committee informed E&Y that it would be dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The reports of E&Y on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 25, 2011 and December 26, 2010 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 25, 2011 and December 26, 2010 and through March 14, 2012, there were no disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with E&Y on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of E&Y, would have caused E&Y to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in its report on the consolidated financial statements for such years.

During the fiscal years ended December 25, 2011 and December 26, 2010 and through March 14, 2012, there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

In accordance with Item 304(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, the Company furnished a copy of the above disclosures to E&Y and requested that E&Y provide a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the statements made above. A copy of such letter is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2012.

During the fiscal years ended December 25, 2011 and December 26, 2010 and through March 14, 2012, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has consulted with KPMG with respect to either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and neither written nor oral advice was provided to the Company that KPMG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Items 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

We provided KPMG with a copy of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2012 and requested KPMG to provide a letter addressed to the SEC containing any new information, clarification of the expression of our views, or the respects in which it does not agree with the statements made by us. KPMG advised us that it had reviewed the disclosures in this report and had no basis upon which to submit such a letter to the SEC.

## Audit Fees

Fees for audit services totaled $1,188,777 in 2013 and $1,137,691 in 2012. Fees were incurred for the annual audit, the audit of internal controls over financial reporting (i.e., the Sarbanes-Oxley 404 Audit), the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required in Mexico and assistance with registration statements and accounting consultations.



## Audit-Related Fees

We incurred no fees for audit-related services during 2013 or 2012. Audit-related services principally include transaction assistance, Sarbanes-Oxley 404 assistance and employee benefit plan audits.

## Tax Fees

Fees for tax services totaled $85,500 in 2013 and $17,000 in 2012. Tax-related services principally included assistance with a tax return for two of our captive insurance subsidiaries and tax advice related to our Mexico subsidiaries in 2013 and assistance with a tax return for two of our captive insurance subsidiaries in 2012.

## All Other Fees

We incurred no fees for other services not included above during 2013 or 2012.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit fees of the independent registered public accounting firm during 2013 and 2012.

## Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

In accordance with its Charter, our Audit Committee has established policies and procedures by which it approves in advance any audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under these procedures, prior to the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for pre-approved services, requests or applications for the independent registered public accounting firm to provide services must be submitted to our Chief Financial Officer, or his designee, and the Audit Committee and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The Chief Financial Officer, or his designee, and the independent registered public accounting firm must ensure that the independent registered public accounting firm is not engaged to perform the proposed services unless those services are within the list of services that have received the Audit Committee’s pre-approval and must cause the Audit Committee to be informed in a timely manner of all services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm and the related fees.

Requests or applications for the independent registered public accounting firm to provide services that require additions or revisions to the 2013 pre-approval will be submitted to the Audit Committee (or any Audit Committee members who have been delegated pre-approval authority) by the Chief Financial Officer or his designee. Each request or application must include:

- a recommendation by the Chief Financial Officer (or designee) as to whether the Audit Committee should approve the request or application; and

- a joint statement of the Chief Financial Officer (or designee) and the independent registered public accounting firm as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s regulations and the requirements for auditor independence of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The Audit Committee also will not permit the engagement to provide any services to the extent that the SEC has prohibited the provision of those services by independent registered public accounting firms.

The Audit Committee delegated authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee to:

- pre-approve any services proposed to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm and not already pre-approved or prohibited by this policy up to $25,000;

- increase any authorized fee limit for pre-approved services (but not by more than 30% of the initial amount that was pre-approved) before we or our subsidiaries engage the independent registered public accounting firm to perform services for any amount in excess of the fee limit; and

• investigate further the scope, necessity or advisability of any services as to which pre-approval is sought.

The Chairman of the Audit Committee is required to report any pre-approval or fee increase decisions to the Audit Committee at the next committee meeting.



# REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal audit function and the independent registered public accounting firm, risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee manages the Company’s relationship with its independent registered public accounting firm (who reports directly to the Audit Committee). The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting or other advisors as the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties and to receive appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, from the Company for such advice and assistance.

The Company’s management has primary responsibility for preparing our financial statements and for our financial reporting process. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

In this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

1. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the Company’s management.

2. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Accounting Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU Section 380) as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

3. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public accounting firm's independence.

4. Based on the review and discussions set forth above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013 that was filed with the SEC and that accompanies this proxy statement.

The undersigned members of the Audit Committee have submitted this report to the Board of Directors.

Audit Committee

Michael L. Cooper, Chairman

Charles Macaluso

Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior



## PROPOSAL 6. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Board of Directors recommends the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2014. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection.

Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and to be available to respond to appropriate questions. They will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2014. Proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise.

## Financial Statements Available

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013 is being mailed concurrently with this proxy statement. The annual report does not form any part of the material for the solicitation of proxies. Upon written request of a stockholder, the Company will furnish, without charge, a copy of our annual report. If you would like a copy of the annual report, please contact Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, at: 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634 Attn: Investor Relations. In addition, financial reports and recent filings with the SEC are available on the Internet at www.sec.gov. Company information is also available on the Internet at http://www.pilgrims.com. Information contained on the website is not part of this proxy statement.



## SECURITY OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 2014, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each person known by us to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock (the only class of voting securities outstanding); (ii) each of our Directors, including employee Directors; (iii) our Named Executive Officers; and (iv) all of our current Directors and executive officers as a group. Shares are beneficially owned when the person holding the shares has voting or investment power over the shares or the right to acquire voting or investment power within 60 days. Voting power is the power to vote the shares. Investment power is the power to direct the sale or other disposition of the shares.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Name and Beneficial Owner</td><td colspan="2">Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock</td><td rowspan="2">Percent of Outstanding Common Stock</td><td rowspan="2">Percent of Voting Power</td></tr><tr><td>Common Stock</td><td>Common Stock</td></tr><tr><td>JBS USA Holdings, Inc. \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>195,445,936</td><td>75.45%</td><td>75.45%</td><td>75.45%</td></tr><tr><td>1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Wesley Mendonça Batista \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>195,445,936</td><td>75.45%</td><td>75.45%</td><td>75.45%</td></tr><tr><td>1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Joesley Mendonça Batista \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>195,445,936</td><td>75.45%</td><td>75.45%</td><td>75.45%</td></tr><tr><td>1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>211,000</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td>75,075</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Michael L. Cooper</td><td>4,885</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>David E. Bell</td><td>2,000</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Gilberto Tomazoni</td><td>—</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Charles Macaluso</td><td>—</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes</td><td>—</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Wallim Cruz De Vasconcellos Junior</td><td>—</td><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>All executive officers and Directors as a group (10) \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>195,738,896</td><td>75.57%</td><td>75.57%</td><td>75.57%</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{*} \)  Less than 1%.

(a) JBS USA Holdings, Inc. is a subsidiary of JBS Hungary Holdings Kft., a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of JBS S.A. JBS S.A. is ultimately controlled by the Batista family, which is comprised of José Batista Sobrinho, the founder of JBS S.A., Flora Mendonça Batista, and their six children, José Batista Júnior, Valéria Batista Mendonça Ramos, Vanessa Mendonça Batista, Wesley Mendonça Batista, Joesley Mendonça Batista and Vivianne Mendonça Batista. The Batista family indirectly owns 100.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of J&F Participações S.A., a Brazilian corporation which owns 44.0% of the outstanding capital of JBS S.A., and, except for Mr. José Batista Sobrinho and Mrs. Flora Mendonça Batista, directly owns 100% of the equity interests in ZMF Fundo de Investimento em Participações, a Brazilian investment fund which owns 6.1% of the outstanding capital of JBS S.A. Wesley Mendonça Batista and Joesley Mendonça Batista are members of our Board of Directors. Through J&F Participações S.A. and FB Participações S.A., Wesley Mendonça Batista and Joesley Mendonça Batista are members of the Batista family and each beneficially own all shares of our common stock through their controlling interest in JBS S.A. As a result of the ownership structure and other relationships described above, each of JBS USA Holdings, Inc., Wesley Mendonça Batista and Joesley Mendonça Batista is the beneficial owner, with shared voting and dispositive power, of 176,066,229 shares of our common stock.



## Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity plans as of December 29, 2013.

<table><tr><td>Plan Category</td><td>Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights</td><td>Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Option, Warrants and Rights</td><td>Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6,585,393 (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6,585,393 (a)</td></tr></table>

(a) Represents shares of our common stock that may be issued under the LTIP. As of December 29, 2013, the Company has granted an aggregate of 102,675 shares of restricted stock and 815,494 RSUs under the LTIP. As of December 29, 2013, no other awards have been issued under the LTIP. For additional information concerning terms of the LTIP, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Components of Compensation - Long Term Incentive Plan” and “Executive Compensation - Long Term Incentive Plan.”

## Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and Directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the stock exchange in which our common stock is listed. Officers, Directors and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms, we believe that all other filing requirements applicable to our officers, Directors and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock were complied with for 2013, except that Mr. Tomazoni did not timely file his Form 3.

## HOUSEHOLDING OF STOCKHOLDER MATERIALS

Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of this proxy statement or annual report to stockholders may have been sent to multiple stockholders in the same household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to any stockholder who requests by writing to our Investor Relations Department at the following address: 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634 or by telephoning (970) 506-8192. Any stockholder who currently is receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for his or her household should contact his or her bank, broker or other nominee record holder.

## IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 2014

This proxy statement and the Company’s 2013 Annual Report are also available electronically on our hosted website. You may view these directly at: www.envisionreports.com/PPC.

To access and review the materials made available electronically:

1. Go to www.envisionreports.com/PPC.

2. Enter the 12-digit control number located on the proxy card.

3. Click “View Stockholder Material.”

We encourage you to review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.



## OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors is not aware of, and it is not anticipated that there will be presented at the Annual Meeting, any business other than the proposals regarding the election of the Directors, a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, the proposal regarding the approval of the terms of the performance goals for the STIP, the proposal regarding the approval of the terms of the performance goals for the LTIP and the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm described above. If other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named on the accompanying proxy card will vote the returned proxies as the Board of Directors recommends.

By order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ William W. Lovette

WILLIAM W. LOVETTE

Greeley, Colorado

President and

March 31, 2014

Chief Executive Officer



# UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___ to ___
Commission File number 1-9273



PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

75-1285071
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado
(Address of principal executive offices)

80634-9038

(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (970) 506-8000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01

Name of each exchange on which registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ( \( §232.405 \)  of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ☒

Accelerated Filer ☐

Non-accelerated Filer ☐

Smaller reporting company ☐

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2013, was $905,871,034. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners have been deemed affiliates. Number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 19, 2014 was 259,029,033.



Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report.



## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I Page
Item 1. Business 2
Item 1A. Risk Factors 11
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 17
Item 2. Properties 18
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 18
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 21
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 22
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 24
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 27
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 41
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 42
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 91
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 91
Item 9B. Other Information 94
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 95
Item 11. Executive Compensation 95
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 95
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 95
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 95
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule 96
Signatures 99



## Item 1. Business

## Company Overview

Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (referred to herein as “Pilgrim’s,” “PPC,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or similar terms), which was incorporated in Texas in 1968 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1986, is the successor to a partnership founded in 1946 as a retail feed store. We are one of the largest chicken producers in the world with operations in the United States (“U.S.”), Mexico and Puerto Rico. We are primarily engaged in the production, processing, marketing and distribution of fresh, frozen and value-added chicken products to retailers, distributors and foodservice operators. We offer a wide range of products to our customers through strong national and international distribution channels. We employ approximately 36,700 people and have the capacity to process more than 34.7 million birds per week for a total of more than 10.2 billion pounds of live chicken annually. In 2013, we generated 8.4 billion in total revenue and produced 7.2 billion pounds of chicken products.

The Company operates on the basis of a 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on the Sunday falling on or before December 31. The reader should assume any reference we make to a particular year (for example, 2013) in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements applies to our fiscal year and not the calendar year. Fiscal 2013 was a 52-week fiscal year.

We market our balanced portfolio of fresh, prepared and value-added chicken products to a diverse set of customers across the U.S., Mexico and in approximately 100 other countries. We have become a valuable partner to our customers and a recognized industry leader by consistently providing high-quality products and services designed to meet their needs and enhance their business. Our sales efforts are largely targeted towards the foodservice industry, principally chain restaurants and food processors such as Chick-fil-A \( ^{®} \)  and Yum! Brands \( ^{®} \) , distributors such as US Foods and Syco \( ^{®} \)  and retail customers, including grocery store chains and wholesale clubs such as Kroger \( ^{®} \) , Wal-Mart \( ^{®} \) , Costco \( ^{®} \) , Publix \( ^{®} \)  and Sam’s Club \( ^{®} \) .

Our Mexico operations generated approximately 10.8% of our net sales in 2013. We are one of the largest producers and sellers of chicken in Mexico and we believe we are one of the most efficient producers of chicken in that region. Our presence in Mexico provides access to a market with growing demand and has enabled us to leverage our operational strengths within the region. The market for chicken products in Mexico is still developing with most sales attributed to fresh, commodity-oriented, market price-based business. We believe our Mexico business is well positioned to continue benefiting from these trends in the Mexican consumer market. Additionally, we are an important player in the live market, which accounts for approximately 33% of the industry’s chicken sales in Mexico in 2013. We intend to expand our presence in Mexico by capitalizing on our vast experience in providing a broad range of high-quality products in addition to our well-known service.

As a vertically integrated company, we control every phase of the production of our products. We believe that vertical integration helps us better manage food safety and quality, as well as more effectively control margins and improve customer service. We currently operate in 12 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Our plants are strategically located to ensure that customers timely receive the freshest products. We operate 24 fresh processing plants in the U.S., six prepared foods cook plants in the U.S., one fresh processing plant in Puerto Rico, three processing plants in Mexico, and 13 distribution centers (one in Puerto Rico and 12 in Mexico). In addition, the Company operates eight rendering facilities (five in the U.S., one in Puerto Rico and two in Mexico) and three pet food plants in the U.S. The Company has six additional processing plants that are currently idle. Combined with our global network of approximately 4,200 growers, 28 feed mills and 36 hatcheries, we believe we are well positioned to supply the growing demand for our products.

On December 1, 2008, Pilgrim’s and six of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”), seeking reorganization relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. We emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings on December 28, 2009. See “Note 1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for additional information.

## The Industry

## Industry Overview

The U.S. consumes more chicken than any other protein (approximately 31.1 billion pounds projected in calendar year 2014 according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”)), and chicken is the second most consumed protein globally after pork. The U.S. is the world’s largest producer of chicken and is projected to produce approximately 38.5 billion pounds of ready-to-cook broiler meat in calendar year 2014, representing 20.0% of the total world production. China and Brazil produce the second and third most broiler meat, with 16.9% and 15.6% of the world market, respectively, according to the USDA.



The U.S. is the second-largest exporter of broiler meat behind Brazil. The U.S. is projected to export 7.5 billion pounds in calendar year 2014, which would account for 31.0% of the total world exports and 19.6% of the total U.S. production, according to the USDA. The top five exporters controlled over 87% of the market in 2013.

The broiler export marketplace has grown at a rapid pace since the early 1990s. The growth has been driven by various geopolitical events such as the collapse of the former Soviet Union and consumption growth in emerging markets, as well as changing consumer preferences. Key importers of broilers include Russia, China, the EU, Mexico and Saudi Arabia. Other export markets such as Hong Kong, Vietnam, the Middle East and Africa are projected to increase their imports of U.S. chicken.

The U.S. market is concentrated with four major chicken producers accounting for over 50% of production. The U.S. chicken industry is largely vertically integrated with major producers owning and operating feed mills, processing plants and further processing plants while contracting out breeding and broiler production to thousands of contractually bound chicken farmers. More than 90% of all chickens raised for consumption are produced by farmers under contracts with processing companies. Processing companies provide the growers with chickens, feed, vaccines and medicines required for the production of broilers. The grower supplies all systems and labor required to bring the broilers up to slaughter weight. The grower is then paid based on the weight gain exhibited by the flock.

According to the USDA, chicken production in the U.S. increased at a compounded annual growth rate of 1.4% from 2002 through 2012. Similarly, per capita consumption of chicken in the U.S. increased at a compounded annual growth rate of 0.8% during this same period of time. Also during this same period of time, per capita beef consumption in the U.S. declined at a compounded annual growth rate of 0.8% while per capita pork consumption in the U.S. increased at a compounded annual growth rate of only 0.1%. The growth in chicken demand is attributable to (i) relative affordability compared to other proteins such as beef and pork, (ii) the increasingly health conscious nature of U.S. consumers, (iii) chicken’s consistent quality and versatility and (iv) its introduction on many foodservice menus. In addition, global protein demand has remained strong, and we believe protein demand will continue to expand consistent with rising standards of living and a growing middle class in developing countries around the world. USDA estimates from 2010 through 2020 show an anticipated increase of global chicken demand of 29%, 81% of which is expected to come from emerging markets. We believe our relationship with our largest stockholder, JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (“JBS USA”) positions us to capture a portion of those emerging markets.

We benefit from a shorter production lifecycle of broilers compared to other proteins. While production for cattle takes approximately 28 to 39 months from breeding to slaughter and the production for pork takes 11 to 12 months, the production lifecycle for the broiler is only ten weeks. There are three key components of broilers that are sold for consumption: the breast, the wing and the leg quarters. An estimated 88% of broiler production in the U.S. is sold in separate parts, rather than as a whole bird. This is due primarily to domestic preferences associated with white meat, as well as increased demand for boneless breasts and wings.

## Key Industry Dynamics

Pricing. Changes to either the supply or demand components of the chicken market can significantly impact the profitability of key players in the industry, including our company. Specifically, any supply or demand shift within the broiler industry can drive a change in pricing of chicken products and significantly affect the income generated by the producer. Items that influence chicken pricing in the U.S. include international demand, changes in production by other broiler producing countries, input costs and the demand associated with substitute products such as beef and pork. While broiler producers attempt to match supply and demand, a minor change in downstream demand can impact whether the planned supply meets the market need. We believe our focus on sales mix enables us to adapt to changing supply demand dynamics by adjusting our production to maximize value.

Feed. Broilers are fed corn and soybean meal as well as certain vitamins and minerals. Corn and soybean meal accounted for approximately 50% and 27% of our feed costs, respectively, in 2013. Broiler production is significantly more efficient from a feed perspective than cattle or hog production. Approximately two pounds of feed are required for each pound of chicken, as compared to approximately seven and 3.5 pounds for cattle and hogs, respectively.

Historically, cost of feed had been largely steady, with occasional spikes resulting from externalities. These externalities often took the form of poor weather conditions, such as droughts or excessive rains leading to poor crop yields and increased demand both domestically for ethanol and globally for protein production. In recent years, feed prices have also been impacted by increased demand both domestically for ethanol and globally for protein production. Market prices for feed ingredients remained at historically high levels until the latter half of 2013 and remain volatile. In response to these volatile market prices, we have sought to mitigate the impact of feed price volatility on our profitability by decreasing the amount of our products that are sold under longer term fixed price contracts, broadening our product portfolio and expanding the variety of contracts within our book of business. We believe that having a broad product portfolio provides flexibility in our product offerings and enables us to focus our production on the most profitable products within any feed ingredient price environment. Additionally, we believe that having a variety of contracts with more flexible pricing reduces the risk associated with volatile feed prices by creating a spread model, which allows us to reflect market prices on a more real-time basis, while ensuring volume commitments to our customer base.



We believe that our competitive strengths will enable us to maintain and grow our position as a leading chicken company and to capitalize on future favorable growth opportunities:

Leading market position in the growing chicken industry. We are a leading chicken producer in the U.S. with a 19.0% market share, based on ready-to-cook production in 2013. We are also one of the largest chicken producers on a global basis. We believe we can maintain this prominent market position as we are one of the few producers in the chicken industry that can fully satisfy the requirements of large retailers and foodservice companies due to our broad product range, national distribution and technical capabilities. We believe we are well positioned to be the primary chicken supplier for large customers due to our ability to provide consistent supply, innovate and develop new products to address consumer desires and provide competitive pricing across a diverse product portfolio. Our vertical integration gives us control over our supply of chicken and chicken parts. Further, our processing facilities offer a wide range of capabilities and are particularly suited for the high-volume production as well as low-volume custom production runs necessary to meet both the capacity and quality requirements of our customer base. Finally, we have established a reputation for dependable quality, highly responsive service and excellent technical support while tailoring our products to market taste preferences.

Experienced management team and results-oriented corporate culture. We have a proven senior management team whose tenure in the chicken industry has spanned numerous market cycles and is among the most experienced in the industry. Our senior management team is led by William W. Lovette, our Chief Executive Officer, who has over 30 years of experience in the chicken industry. Our management team has successfully improved and realigned our business and instilled a corporate culture focused on performance and accountability. Management's strategy included the implementation of zero-based budgeting and plant-level profit and loss analysis, driving engagement and ownership over the results at each plant. Our senior operating executives have backgrounds with leading agribusiness companies, including Tyson Foods, Inc., ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Bunge Limited. We believe that this combination of backgrounds and experience will continue to provide the foundation for a results-oriented business strategy and will enable us to maintain and strengthen long-term relationships with customers and help us grow our business in the future. We also benefit from management ideas, best practices, and talent shared with the seasoned management team at our majority stockholder, JBS USA, and its parent company, JBS S.A., who have over 50 years of combined experience operating protein processing facilities in South America, North America and Australia.

Leaner, more focused enterprise under new strategy. As a result of our restructuring efforts, we are a more efficient and lean organization supported by a market-driven business strategy. Since 2008, we have closed, idled or sold 11 plants and 14 distribution centers, reduced or consolidated production at other facilities, streamlined our workforce and reduced administrative and corporate expenses including moving our corporate headquarters and closing satellite headquarters as part of our becoming a majority owned subsidiary of JBS USA. In addition, we continue to make significant production improvements driven by improved yields, labor, cost savings and product mix. Since 2010, these efforts have resulted in a $642.0 million cumulative annualized run rate improvement in plant-related costs, sales mix and product yield. As a result of these efforts, we are a financially stronger company with a more conservative capital structure since we emerged from bankruptcy in 2009.

Blue chip and diverse customer base across all industry segments. We benefit from strong relationships with leading companies in every customer segment, including Chick-fil-A \( ^{®} \) , Sysco \( ^{®} \) , US Foods, Yum! Brands \( ^{®} \) , Kroger \( ^{®} \) , Wal-Mart \( ^{®} \) , Costco \( ^{®} \) , Publix \( ^{®} \) , Sam’s Club \( ^{®} \)  and ConAgra Foods \( ^{®} \) , all of whom have been doing business with us for more than five years. We sell our products to a large and diverse customer base, with over 5,000 customers and no concentrations above 7.0% of net sales except for our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which accounted for 9.7% of net sales in 2013.

Relationship with JBS USA. As a majority-owned subsidiary of JBS USA, we work closely with JBS USA’s management to identify areas where both companies can achieve synergies. As part of our integration plan, we moved our headquarters to Greeley, Colorado, the headquarters of JBS USA. In addition to cost savings through the integration of certain corporate functions and the rationalization of facilities, our relationship with JBS USA allows us to enjoy several advantages given its diversified international operations and strong record in commodity risk management. We seek to leverage JBS USA’s international network by expanding into untapped international markets and strengthening our presence in geographies in which we already operate. In addition, JBS USA’s expertise in managing the risk associated with volatile commodity inputs will help us to further improve our operations and manage our margins.



We intend to continue growing our business and enhancing profitability by pursuing the following strategies:

Valued partner with our key customers. We are a leading producer of chicken products in the world. We have developed and acquired complementary markets, distributor relationships and geographic locations, establishing relationships with broad-line national distributors and retailers that have enabled us to expand our customer base and provide nationwide distribution capabilities for all of our product lines. As a result, we believe we are one of only two U.S. chicken producers that can supply the growing demand for a broad range of price competitive standard and specialized products with well-known brand names on a nationwide basis from a single-source supplier. Additionally, we intend to leverage our innovation capabilities to develop new products along with our customers to accelerate sales and enhance the profitability of chicken products at their businesses. By having best-in-class quality management systems, we plan to further enhance our industry position by optimizing our sales mix and production to increase our profitability and accelerate innovation.

Operational excellence. As production and sales grow, we continue to focus on improving operating efficiencies by focusing on cost reductions, more effective processes, training and our total quality management program. Specific initiatives include:

• Benchmarking live and plant costs against the industry;

• Striving to be in the top 25% of the industry for yields and costs;

• Fostering a culture of accountability and ownership deeper in the organization;

• Conducting monthly performance reviews with senior management; and

• Improving sales mix and price.

Strategically grow value added exports. We will continue our focus on expanding international sales by seeking opportunities to increase penetration in our existing markets and entering attractive new markets. Expansion of our export sales complements our U.S. chicken operations and positions us to capitalize on expected global demand growth, particularly in emerging markets. According to the USDA, the export of U.S. chicken products increased at an average annual growth rate of 4.4% from 2002 through 2012. We believe U.S. chicken exports will continue to grow as global demand increases for high-quality, low-cost meat protein sources. Utilizing the extensive sales network of JBS USA, we believe that we can accelerate the sales of value-added chicken products into our international distribution channels. Our key international markets include Mexico, the Middle East, Asia and countries within the Commonwealth of Independent States (“CIS”). Our relationship with JBS USA has improved our access to markets such as Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. We believe substantial opportunities exist to expand our sales to these markets by capitalizing on direct international distribution channels supplemented by our existing export broker relationships. We also believe that opportunities exist to sell more profitable products into these markets and continue to look for opportunities to invest capital to support these markets. Our export sales accounted for approximately 10.0% of our U.S. chicken sales in 2013.

## Reportable Business Segment

We operate in one reportable business segment, as a producer and seller of chicken products we either produce or purchase for resale in the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico. We conduct separate operations in the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico; however, for geographic reporting purposes, we include Puerto Rico with our U.S. operations. See “Note 19. Business Segment and Geographic Reporting” of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for additional information.

## Narrative Description of Business

## Products and Markets

Our primary product types are fresh chicken products, prepared chicken products and value-added export chicken products. We sell our fresh chicken products to the foodservice and retail markets. Our fresh chicken products consist of refrigerated (nonfrozen) whole or cut-up chicken, either pre-marinated or non-marinated and prepackaged case-ready chicken. Our case-ready chicken includes various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs labeled and priced ready for the retail grocer's fresh meat counter. Our fresh chicken sales accounted for 59.9% of our total U.S. chicken sales in 2013.

We also sell prepared chicken products, including portion-controlled breast fillets, tenderloins and strips, delicatessen products, salads, formed nuggets and patties and bone-in chicken parts. These products are sold either refrigerated or frozen and may be fully cooked, partially cooked or raw. In addition, these products are breaded or non-breaded and either pre-marinated or non-marinated. Our prepared chicken products sales accounted for 29.7% of our total U.S. chicken sales in 2013.

Value-added export and other chicken products primarily consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold either refrigerated for distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets. We sell U.S.-produced chicken products for export to Mexico, the Middle East, Asia, countries within the CIS and other world markets. In the U.S., prices of these products are negotiated daily or weekly and are generally related to market prices quoted by the USDA or other public price reporting services. Prices for export sales are determined by supply and demand and local market conditions. In certain newly accessed international markets, we have established premium brands, which allow us to market our products at a premium to commodity price levels within those regions. Our value-added export and other chicken products sales accounted for 10.4% of our total U.S. chicken sales in 2013.



Our primary customer markets consist of the foodservice and retail channels, as well as selected export and other markets.

Our foodservice market principally consists of chain restaurants, food processors, broad-line distributors and certain other institutions located throughout the continental U.S. Within this market, we service frozen, fresh and corporate accounts. Fresh and frozen chicken products are usually pre-cut to customer specifications and are often marinated to enhance value and product differentiation. Corporate accounts include further-processed and value-added products supplied to select foodservice customers, improving their ability to manage product consistency and quality in a cost efficient manner. We believe we are positioned to be the primary or secondary supplier to national and international chain restaurants who require multiple suppliers of chicken products. Additionally, we believe we are well suited to be the sole supplier for many regional chain restaurants. Regional chain restaurants often offer better margin opportunities and a growing base of business. We believe we have operational strengths in terms of full-line product capabilities, high-volume production capacities, research and development expertise and extensive distribution and marketing experience are competitive strengths compared to smaller and non-vertically integrated producers. Foodservice growth is anticipated to continue, despite the effects resulting from continued weak economic conditions in the U.S.

Our retail market consists primarily of grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. Our retail market products consist primarily of branded, prepackaged cut-up and whole chicken and chicken parts. We concentrate our efforts in this market on creating value for our customers through category management and supporting key customers in expanding their private label sales programs. Additionally, for many years, we have invested in both trade and retail marketing designed to establish high levels of brand name awareness and consumer preference. We utilize numerous advertising and marketing techniques to develop and strengthen trade and consumer awareness and increase brand loyalty for consumer products marketed under the Gold Kist \( ^{\circledR} \) , County Post \( ^{\circledR} \) , Pierce Chicken \( ^{\circledR} \) , Pilgrim's Pride \( ^{\circledR} \)  and Pilgrim's \( ^{\circledR} \)  brands. We believe our efforts to achieve and maintain brand awareness and loyalty help to achieve greater price premiums than would otherwise be the case in certain markets and support and expand our product distribution. We actively seek to identify and address consumer preferences by using sophisticated qualitative and quantitative consumer research techniques in key geographic markets to discover and validate new product ideas, packaging designs and methods.

Our export and other chicken market consists primarily of customers who purchase for distribution in the U.S. or for export to Mexico, the Middle East, Asia, countries within the CIS and other world markets. Our value-added export and other chicken products, with the exception of our exported prepared chicken products, consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold in bulk, or value-added form, either refrigerated or frozen. We believe that U.S. chicken exports will continue to grow as worldwide demand increases for high-quality, low-cost meat protein sources. We expect that worldwide demand for higher-margin prepared food products will increase over the next several years and believe our strategy of value-added export growth positions us to take advantage of this expected demand.

Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional demand for our dark chicken meat, for which there has been less demand in the U.S. than for white chicken meat. We have expanded our portfolio to provide prepared chicken products tailored for export to the international divisions of our U.S. chain restaurant customers, as well as newly identified customers in regions not previously accessed. Through our relationship with JBS USA, we have developed an international distribution channel focused on growing our tailored export program and expanding value-added products such as all-vegetable-fed whole griller birds, chicken franks and further processed thigh meat. Utilizing the extensive sales network of JBS USA, we believe that we can accelerate the sales of value-added chicken products into these international channels.

The following table sets forth, for the periods beginning with 2009, net sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and markets served with those products. We based the table on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types.



<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td rowspan="2">2011</td><td rowspan="2">2010</td><td colspan="3">Transition</td></tr><tr><td>Period(a)</td><td>2009(a)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U.S. chicken:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Prepared chicken</td><td>$ 2,046,746</td><td>$ 2,239,289</td><td>$ 2,135,337</td><td>$ 2,262,107</td><td>$ 535,810</td><td>$ 2,294,576</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fresh chicken</td><td>4,123,089</td><td>3,583,854</td><td>3,160,429</td><td>2,834,972</td><td>663,418</td><td>3,113,062</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Export and other chicken</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>by-products</td><td>715,969</td><td>817,723</td><td>808,038</td><td>581,303</td><td>134,976</td><td>656,276</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total U.S. chicken</td><td>6,885,804</td><td>6,640,866</td><td>6,103,804</td><td>5,678,382</td><td>1,334,204</td><td>6,063,914</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mexico chicken</td><td>864,454</td><td>758,023</td><td>720,333</td><td>615,433</td><td>127,557</td><td>487,785</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total chicken</td><td>7,750,258</td><td>7,398,889</td><td>6,824,137</td><td>6,293,815</td><td>1,461,761</td><td>6,551,699</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other products:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U.S.</td><td>614,408</td><td>608,619</td><td>674,923</td><td>558,675</td><td>132,500</td><td>505,738</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>46,482</td><td>113,874</td><td>36,638</td><td>29,139</td><td>8,473</td><td>30,618</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total other products</td><td>660,890</td><td>722,493</td><td>711,561</td><td>587,814</td><td>140,973</td><td>536,356</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total net sales</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 7,535,698</td><td>$ 6,881,629</td><td>$ 1,602,734</td><td>$ 7,088,055</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) In December 2009, we changed our fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest September 30 of each year to the last Sunday in December of each year. The change was effective for our 2010 fiscal year, which began December 28, 2009 and ended December 26, 2010 and resulted in an approximate three-month transition period which began September 27, 2009 and ended December 27, 2009.

The following table sets forth, beginning with 2009, the percentage of net U.S. chicken sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and the markets serviced with those products. We based the table and related discussion on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types and customers.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td rowspan="2">2011</td><td rowspan="2">2010</td><td colspan="3">Transition</td></tr><tr><td>Period(a)</td><td>2009(a)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(Percent)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Prepared chicken</td><td>29.7</td><td>33.7</td><td>35.0</td><td>39.9</td><td>40.2</td><td>37.9</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fresh chicken</td><td>59.9</td><td>54.0</td><td>51.7</td><td>49.9</td><td>49.7</td><td>51.3</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Export and other chicken</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>by-products</td><td>10.4</td><td>12.3</td><td>13.3</td><td>10.2</td><td>10.1</td><td>10.8</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total U.S. chicken</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.0</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) In December 2009, we changed our fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest September 30 of each year to the last Sunday in December of each year. The change was effective for our 2010 fiscal year, which began December 28, 2009 and ended December 26, 2010 and resulted in an approximate three-month transition period which began September 27, 2009 and ended December 27, 2009.

## United States Operations

## Product Types

Fresh Chicken Overview. Fresh chicken is an important component of our sales and accounted for $4,123.1 million, or 59.9%, of our total U.S. chicken sales in 2013 and $3,113.1 million, or 51.3%, in 2009. Most fresh chicken products are sold to established customers, based upon certain weekly or monthly market prices reported by the USDA and other public price reporting services, plus a markup, which is dependent upon the customer's location, volume, product specifications and other factors. We believe our practices with respect to sales of fresh chicken are generally consistent with those of our competitors. The majority of these products are sold pursuant to agreements with varying terms that set a price according to formulas based on underlying chicken price markets, subject in many cases to minimum and maximum prices.

Prepared Chicken Overview. In 2013, $2,046.7 million, or 29.7%, of our U.S. chicken sales were in prepared chicken products to foodservice customers and retail distributors, as compared to $2,294.6 million, or 37.9%, in 2009. The production and sale in the U.S. of prepared chicken products reduce the impact of the costs of feed ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient costs are the single largest component of our U.S. cost of sales, representing approximately 46.1% of our U.S. cost of sales in 2013. The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by the global level of supply inventories, demand for feed ingredients, the agricultural policies of the U.S. and foreign governments and weather patterns throughout the world. As further processing is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a product's total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our profitability. Products sold in this form enable us to charge a premium, reduce the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improve and stabilize our profit margins.



We establish prices for our prepared chicken products based primarily upon perceived value to the customer, production costs and prices of competing products. The majority of these products are sold pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price for short-term periods or set a price according to formulas based on an underlying commodity market such as corn and chicken price forecasts, subject in many cases to minimum and maximum prices. Many times, these prices are dependent upon the customer's location, volume, product specifications and other factors.

Value-Added Export and Other Chicken Products Overview. Our value-added export and other products consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold primarily in bulk, nonbranded form, either refrigerated to distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets, and branded and nonbranded prepared chicken products for distribution to export markets. In 2013, approximately $716.0 million, or 10.4%, of our total U.S. chicken sales were attributable to U.S. chicken export and other products, as compared to $656.3 million, or 10.8%, in 2009.

## Markets for Other Products

Presently, this category includes chicken by-products, which we convert into protein products and sell primarily to manufacturers of pet foods. In addition, many of our U.S. feed mills produce and sell some livestock feeds to local dairy farmers and livestock producers. Until November 2011, this category also included products sold through our distribution centers. In 2011, we had regional distribution centers located in Arizona, Texas and Utah that were primarily focused on distributing our own chicken products. In November 2011, we sold the distribution centers to JBS Trading International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of JBS USA. See "Note 16. Related Party Transactions" of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for additional information on the sale of the distribution centers. In addition, we marketed fresh eggs under private labels, in various sizes of cartons and flats to U.S. retail grocery and institutional foodservice customers located primarily in Texas through August 2012. In August 2012, we sold our commercial egg operation to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

## Mexico

## Background

Our Mexico operations generated approximately 10.8% of our net sales in 2013. We are one of the largest producers and sellers of chicken in Mexico. We believe we operate one of the more efficient models for chicken production in Mexico.

## Product Types

While the market for chicken products in Mexico is less developed than in the U.S., with sales attributed to fewer, simpler products, we have been successful in differentiating our products through high-quality client service and product improvements. Additionally, we are an important player in the live market, which accounts for approximately 33% of the chicken sales in Mexico.

## Markets

We sell our chicken products primarily to wholesalers, large restaurant chains, fast food accounts, supermarket chains and direct retail distribution in selected markets. Our largest presence is by far in the central states of the country where we have been able to gain market share. Our presence in Mexico reaches 72.0% of the population.

## Foreign Operations Risks

Our foreign operations pose special risks to our business and operations. A discussion of foreign operations risks is included in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

## Key Customers

Our two largest customers accounted for approximately 15.9% of our net sales in 2013. No customer accounted for ten percent or more of our net sales in 2013.

## General

## Competitive Conditions

The chicken industry is highly competitive. We are one of the largest chicken producers in the world and we believe our relationship with JBS USA enhances our competitive position. In the U.S. and Mexico, we compete principally with other vertically integrated poultry companies. However, there is some competition with non-vertically integrated further processors in the U.S. prepared chicken business. We believe vertical integration generally provides significant, long-term cost and quality advantages over non-vertically integrated further processors.



In general, the competitive factors in the U.S. chicken industry include price, product quality, product development, brand identification, breadth of product line and customer service. Competitive factors vary by major market. In the U.S. retail market, we believe that product quality, brand awareness, customer service and price are the primary bases of competition. In the foodservice market, competition is based on consistent quality, product development, service and price. The export market is competitive on a global level based on price, product quality, product tailoring, brand identification and customer service. Competitive factors vary by market and may be impacted further by trade restrictions, sanitary and phyto-sanitary issues, brand awareness and the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. Dollar against local currencies. We believe that product customization, service and price are the most critical competitive factors for export sales.

In Mexico, where product differentiation has traditionally been limited, we believe product quality and price have been the most critical competitive factors.

## Restructuring Efforts

Since January 2010, we implemented significant operational changes to reduce costs and operate more efficiently, as well as realized substantial benefits through synergies following the JBS USA acquisition. We reduced our production footprint to mitigate capacity utilization and efficiency issues created by previously enacted across-the-board production cuts. In addition, we continue to evaluate our noncore businesses, which has resulted in the sale of certain noncore businesses. Exit and disposal activities from January 2010 to present have eliminated approximately 1,500 positions and recognized net pre-tax charges totaling $115.6 million.

We continue to review and evaluate various restructuring and other alternatives to streamline our operations, improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Such initiatives may include selling assets, consolidating operations and functions and voluntary and involuntary employee separation programs. Any such actions may require us to obtain the pre-approval of our lenders under our credit facilities. In addition, such actions will subject the Company to additional short-term costs, which may include asset impairment charges, lease commitment costs, employee retention and severance costs and other costs. Certain of these activities may have a disproportionate impact on our income relative to the cost savings in a particular period.

## Regulation and Environmental Matters

The chicken industry is subject to government regulation, particularly in the health, workplace safety and environmental areas, including provisions relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, by the Centers for Disease Control, the USDA, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and state and local regulatory authorities in the U.S. and by similar governmental agencies in Mexico. Our chicken processing facilities in the U.S. are subject to on-site examination, inspection and regulation by the USDA. The FDA inspects the production of our feed mills in the U.S. Our Mexican food processing facilities and feed mills are subject to on-site examination, inspection and regulation by a Mexican governmental agency that performs functions similar to those performed by the USDA and FDA. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the operations of our facilities.

Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by the EPA and other state and local authorities relating to handling and discharge of waste water, storm water, air emissions, treatment, storage and disposal of wastes, handling of hazardous substances and remediation of contaminated soil, surface water and groundwater. Our Mexican operations also are subject to extensive regulation by Mexican environmental authorities. The EPA and/or other U.S. or Mexican state and local authorities may, from time to time, adopt revisions to environmental rules and regulations, and/or changes in the terms and conditions of our environmental permits, with which we must comply. Compliance with existing or new environmental requirements, including more stringent limitations imposed or expected in recently-renewed or soon-to-be renewed environmental permits, may require capital expenditures and operating expenses which may be significant. Our operations are also subject to regulation by the EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and other state and local regulatory authorities regarding the treatment and disposal of agricultural and food processing wastes, the use and maintenance of refrigeration systems, including ammonia-based chillers, noise, odor and dust management, the operation of mechanized processing equipment, and other operations.



Some of our facilities have been operating for many years, and were built before current environmental, health and safety standards were imposed and/or in areas that recently have become subject to residential and commercial development pressures. We are upgrading wastewater treatment facilities at a number of our facilities, either pursuant to consent agreements with regulatory authorities or on a voluntary basis in anticipation of future permit requirements. We do not anticipate that the capital expenditures associated with these upgrades, which will be spread over a number of years, will be material.

We have from time to time had incidents at our plants involving worker health and safety. These have included ammonia releases due to mechanical failures in chiller systems and worker injuries and fatalities involving processing equipment and vehicle accidents. We have taken preventive measures in response.

Some of our properties have been impacted by contamination from spills or other releases, and we have incurred costs to remediate such contamination. In addition, in the past we acquired businesses with operations such as pesticide and fertilizer production that involved greater use of hazardous materials and generation of more hazardous wastes than our current operations. While many of those operations have been sold or closed, some environmental laws impose strict and, in certain circumstances, joint and several liability for costs of investigation and remediation of contaminated sites on current and former owners and operators of the sites, and on persons who arranged for disposal of wastes at such sites. In addition, current owners or operators of such contaminated sites may seek to recover cleanup costs from us based on past operations or contractual indemnifications. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for risks associated with compliance with existing or changing environmental requirement.

We anticipate increased regulation by the USDA concerning food safety, by the FDA concerning the use of medications in feed and by the EPA and various other state agencies concerning discharges to the environment. Although we do not currently anticipate that such increased regulation will have a material adverse effect upon us, new environmental, health and safety requirements that are more stringent than we anticipate, stricter interpretations of existing environmental requirements, or obligations related to the investigation or clean-up of contaminated sites may materially affect our business or operations in the future.

## Employees

As of December 29, 2013, we employed approximately 31,600 persons in the U.S. and approximately 5,100 persons in Mexico. Approximately 35.3% of the Company’s employees were covered under collective bargaining agreements. Substantially all employees covered under collective bargaining agreements are covered under agreements that expire in 2015 or 2016 with the exception of one live operations location where the collective bargaining agreement expired in 2013 and negotiations are ongoing. We have not experienced any labor-related work stoppage at any location in over nine years. We believe our relationship with our employees and union leadership is satisfactory. The Company is currently in negotiations at one location, and there is no assurance that agreement will be reached. In the absence of an agreement, we may become subject to labor disruption at this location, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

## Financial Information about Foreign Operations

Our foreign operations are in Mexico. Geographic financial information is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

## Available Information

The Company’s Internet website is www.pilgrims.com. The Company makes available, free of charge, through its Internet website, the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Directors and Officers Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such materials with, or furnishing them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The public may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 and may obtain information about the operation of the Public Information Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.

In addition, the Company makes available, through its Internet website, the Company’s Business Code of Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the written charter of the Audit Committee, each of which is available in print to any stockholder who requests it by contacting the Secretary of the Company at 1770 Promontory Circle, Greeley, Colorado 80634-9038. Information contained on the Company’s website is not included as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report.



Set forth below is certain information relating to our current executive officers:

<table><tr><td>Name</td><td>Age</td><td>Positions</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td>54</td><td>President and Chief Executive Officer</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td>42</td><td>Chief Financial Officer</td></tr></table>

William W. Lovette joined Pilgrim’s as President and Chief Executive Officer on January 3, 2011. He brings more than 30 years of industry leadership experience to Pilgrim’s. He previously served two years as President and Chief Operating Officer of Case Foods, Inc. Before joining Case Foods, Inc., Mr. Lovette spent 25 years with Tyson Foods in various roles in senior management, including President of its International Business Unit, President of its Foodservice Business Unit and Senior Group Vice President of Poultry and Prepared Foods. Mr. Lovette earned a B.S. degree from Texas A&M University. In addition, he is a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.

Fabio Sandri has served as the Chief Financial Officer for Pilgrim’s since June 2011. He previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Estacio Participações, the private post-secondary educational institution in Brazil since April 2010. From November 2008 until April 2010, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Imbra SA, a provider of dental services based in Sao Paolo, Brazil. Commencing in 2005 through October 2008, he was employed by Braskem S.A., a New York Stock Exchange-listed petrochemical company headquartered in Camaçari, Brazil, first from 2005 to 2007 as its strategy director and from 2007 until his departure as its corporate controller. He earned his Masters in Business Administration in 2001 from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and a degree in electrical engineering in 1993 from Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo.

## Item 1A. Risk Factors

## Forward Looking Statements

Certain written and oral statements made by our Company and subsidiaries of our Company may constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This includes statements made herein, in our other filings with the SEC, in press releases, and in certain other oral and written presentations.

Statements of our intentions, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future, denoted by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “plan,” “project,” “imply,” “intend,” “should,” “foresee” and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements that reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such risks, uncertainties and assumptions include those described under “Risk Factors” below and elsewhere in this annual report.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of these factors, among others, many of which are beyond our control.

In making these statements, we are not undertaking, and specifically decline to undertake, any obligation to address or update each or any factor in future filings or communications regarding our business or results, and we are not undertaking to address how any of these factors may have caused changes in information contained in previous filings or communications. The risks described below are not the only risks we face, and additional risks and uncertainties may also impair our business operations. The occurrence of any one or more of the following or other currently unknown factors could materially adversely affect our business and operating results.

## Risk Factors

The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry or financial position or our future financial performance. While we believe we have identified and discussed below all risk factors affecting our business that we believe are material, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position and financial performance in the future.

Industry cyclicality can affect our earnings, especially due to fluctuations in commodity prices of feed ingredients and chicken.

Profitability in the chicken industry is materially affected by the commodity prices of feed ingredients and market prices of chicken, which are determined by supply and demand factors. As a result, the chicken industry is subject to cyclical earnings fluctuations.



The price of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by the global level of supply inventories and demand for feed ingredients, the agricultural policies of the U.S. and foreign governments and weather patterns throughout the world. In particular, weather patterns often change agricultural conditions in an unpredictable manner. A significant change in weather patterns could affect supplies of feed ingredients, as well as both the industry’s and our ability to obtain feed ingredients, grow chickens or deliver products. More recently, feed prices have been impacted by increased demand both domestically for ethanol and globally for protein production, as well as grain production levels outside the U.S.

Market prices for feed ingredients remained at historically high levels throughout 2011, 2012 and most of 2013. Market prices for feed ingredients remain volatile. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the price of corn or soybean meal will not continue to rise as a result of, among other things, increasing demand for these products around the world and alternative uses of these products, such as ethanol and biodiesel production.

Volatility in feed ingredient prices has had, and may continue to have, a materially adverse effect on our operating results, which has resulted in, and may continue to result in, additional noncash expenses due to impairment of the carrying amounts of certain of our assets. We periodically seek, to the extent available, to enter into advance purchase commitments or financial derivative contracts for the purchase of feed ingredients in an effort to manage our feed ingredient costs. The use of these instruments may not be successful. In addition, we have not designated the derivative financial instruments that we have purchased to mitigate commodity purchase exposures as cash flow hedges. Therefore, we recognize changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments immediately in earnings. Unexpected changes in the fair value of these instruments could adversely affect the results of our operations. Although we have sought to mitigate the impact of feed price volatility on our profitability by decreasing the amount of our products that are sold under longer term fixed price contracts, these changes will not eliminate the impact of changes in feed ingredient prices on our profitability and would prevent us from profiting on such contracts during times of declining market prices of chicken.

Outbreaks of livestock diseases in general and poultry diseases in particular, including avian influenza, can significantly affect our ability to conduct our operations and demand for our products.

We take precautions designed to ensure that our flocks are healthy and that our processing plants and other facilities operate in a sanitary and environmentally-sound manner. However, events beyond our control, such as the outbreaks of disease, either in our own flocks or elsewhere, could significantly affect demand for our products or our ability to conduct our operations. Furthermore, an outbreak of disease could result in governmental restrictions on the import and export of our fresh chicken or other products to or from our suppliers, facilities or customers, or require us to destroy one or more of our flocks. This could also result in the cancellation of orders by our customers and create adverse publicity that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products successfully and on our business, reputation and prospects.

During 2012 and 2013, there was substantial publicity regarding a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza, known as H7N3, which affected several states in central Mexico. There are several hypotheses about the cause of the outbreak in Mexico, including transmission from wild birds or the possibility of introduction through poultry trade. Approximately 85% of the birds affected were table egg laying hens, a component of the industry in which Pilgrim's does not participate. The Mexican government and poultry industry culled approximately 28.3 million birds. The disease was found in approximately 90 commercial facilities, including one Pilgrim's breeder farm. The Mexican government and poultry industry undertook an extensive vaccination program with the goal of administering approximately 210 million doses per month. To prevent further spread, the Mexican government also authorized the administration of 205 million doses of vaccine to "long-life" birds in nine Mexican states with priority given to progenitor birds (producing breeder hens), breeders (producing broiler chicks and layer chicks for table eggs) and layers.

During the first half of 2013, there was also substantial publicity regarding a low pathogenic strain of avian influenza, known as H7N9, which affected eastern and northern China in and around the cities of Shanghai and Beijing. It is widely believed that H7N9 circulates in wild birds and may be transmitted to domestic poultry. H7N9 is also believed to have passed from birds to humans as humans came into contact with live birds that were infected with the disease. There were 133 confirmed cases, including 43 deaths, of H7N9 infection in humans related to this outbreak.

Although neither H7N3 nor H7N9 has been identified in the U.S., there have been outbreaks of other low pathogenic strains of avian influenza in the U.S., and in Mexico outbreaks of both high and low-pathogenic strains of avian influenza are a fairly common occurrence. Historically, the outbreaks of low pathogenic strains of avian influenza have not generated the same level of concern, or received the same level of publicity or been accompanied by the same reduction in demand for poultry products in certain countries as that associated with highly pathogenic strains such as H7N3 or highly infectious strains such as H7N9. Even if the H7N3 or H7N9 strains of avian influenza do not spread to the U.S., there can be no assurance that these outbreaks will not materially adversely affect demand for U.S.-produced poultry internationally and/or domestically, and, if it were to spread to the U.S., there can be no assurance that it would not significantly affect our ability to conduct our operations and/or demand for our products, in each case in a manner having a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and/or prospects.



## If our poultry products become contaminated, we may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls.

Poultry products may be subject to contamination by disease-producing organisms, or pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and generic E.coli. These pathogens are generally found in the environment, and, as a result, there is a risk that, as a result of food processing, they could be present in our processed poultry products. These pathogens can also be introduced as a result of improper handling at the further processing, foodservice or consumer level. These risks may be controlled, although not eliminated, by adherence to good manufacturing practices and finished product testing. We have little, if any, control over proper handling once the product has been shipped. Illness and death may result if the pathogens are not eliminated at the further processing, foodservice or consumer level. Even an inadvertent shipment of contaminated products is a violation of law and may lead to increased risk of exposure to product liability claims, product recalls and increased scrutiny by federal and state regulatory agencies and may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and prospects.

Product liability claims or product recalls can adversely affect our business reputation, expose us to increased scrutiny by federal and state regulators and may not be fully covered by insurance.

The packaging, marketing and distribution of food products entail an inherent risk of product liability and product recall and the resultant adverse publicity. We may be subject to significant liability if the consumption of any of our products causes injury, illness or death. We could be required to recall certain products in the event of contamination or damage to the products. In addition to the risks of product liability or product recall due to deficiencies caused by our production or processing operations, we may encounter the same risks if any third party tampers with our products. There can be no assurance that we will not be required to perform product recalls, or that product liability claims will not be asserted against us, in the future. Any claims that may be made may create adverse publicity that would have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products successfully or on our business, reputation, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

If our poultry products become contaminated, we may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls. There can be no assurance that any litigation or reputational injury associated with product recalls will not have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products successfully or on our business, reputation, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently maintain insurance with respect to certain of these risks, including product liability insurance, property insurance, workers compensation insurance, business interruption insurance and general liability insurance, but in many cases such insurance is expensive, difficult to obtain and no assurance can be given that such insurance can be maintained in the future on acceptable terms, or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to any such events, or at all. Moreover, even though our insurance coverage may be designed to protect us from losses attributable to certain events, it may not adequately protect us from liability and expenses we incur in connection with such events.

Competition in the chicken industry with other vertically integrated poultry companies may make us unable to compete successfully in these industries, which could adversely affect our business.

The chicken industry is highly competitive. In both the U.S. and Mexico, we primarily compete with other vertically integrated chicken companies.

In general, the competitive factors in the U.S. chicken industry include price, product quality, product development, brand identification, breadth of product line and customer service. Competitive factors vary by major market. In the foodservice market, competition is based on consistent quality, product development, service and price. In the U.S. retail market, we believe that competition is based on product quality, brand awareness, customer service and price. Further, there is some competition with non-vertically integrated further processors in the prepared chicken business. In Mexico, where product differentiation has traditionally been limited, we believe product quality and price have been the most critical competitive factors.

The loss of one or more of our largest customers could adversely affect our business.

Our two largest customers accounted for approximately 15.9% of our net sales in 2013. Our business could suffer significant setbacks in revenues and operating income if we lost one or more of our largest customers, or if our customers' plans and/or markets should change significantly.



## Our foreign operations pose special risks to our business and operations.

We have significant operations and assets located in Mexico and may participate in or acquire operations and assets in other foreign countries in the future. Foreign operations are subject to a number of special risks such as currency exchange rate fluctuations, trade barriers, exchange controls, expropriation and changes in laws and policies, including tax laws and laws governing foreign-owned operations.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations have adversely affected us in the past. Exchange rate fluctuations or one or more other risks may have a material adverse effect on our business or operations in the future.

Our operations in Mexico are conducted through subsidiaries organized under the laws of Mexico. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries, including trade creditors, will generally have priority as to the assets of our subsidiaries over our claims. Additionally, the ability of our Mexican subsidiaries to make payments and distributions to us may be limited by the terms of our Mexico credit facility and will be subject to, among other things, Mexican law. In the past, these laws have not had a material adverse effect on the ability of our Mexican subsidiaries to make these payments and distributions. However, laws such as these may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our Mexican subsidiaries to make these payments and distributions in the future.

## Disruptions in international markets and distribution channels could adversely affect our business.

Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional demand for our products. In particular, given U.S. customers' general preference for white meat, we have targeted international markets for the sale of dark chicken meat, specifically leg quarters, which are a natural by-product of our U.S. operations' concentration on prepared chicken products. As part of this initiative, we have created a significant international distribution network into several markets in Mexico, the Middle East, Asia and countries within the CIS. Our success in these markets may be, and our success in recent periods has been, adversely affected by disruptions in chicken export markets. For example, China imposed anti-dumping and countervailing duties on the U.S. chicken producers in 2010, which have deterred Chinese importers from purchases of U.S.-origin chicken products. Additionally, from time to time Russia has restricted the importation of U.S. poultry products for the protection of their domestic poultry producers and in cases of allegations of consumer health issues.

A significant risk is disruption due to import restrictions and tariffs, other trade protection measures, and import or export licensing requirements. In addition, disruptions may be caused by outbreaks of disease such as avian influenza, either in our flocks or elsewhere in the world, and resulting changes in consumer preferences.

One or more of these or other disruptions in the international markets and distribution channels could adversely affect our business or operations.

## Regulation, present and future, is a constant factor affecting our business.

Our operations will continue to be subject to federal, state and local governmental regulation, including in the health, safety and environmental areas. We anticipate increased regulation by various agencies concerning food safety, the use of medication in feed formulations and the disposal of chicken by-products and wastewater discharges. Also, changes in laws or regulations or the application thereof may lead to government enforcement actions and the resulting litigation by private litigants, such as various wage and hour and environmental issues.

In addition, unknown matters, new laws and regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing laws or regulations may also materially affect our business or operations in the future.

New immigration legislation or increased enforcement efforts in connection with existing immigration legislation could cause the costs of doing business to increase, cause us to change the way we conduct our business or otherwise disrupt our operations.

Immigration reform continues to attract significant attention in the public arena and the U.S. Congress. If new federal immigration legislation is enacted or if states in which we do business enact immigration laws, such laws may contain provisions that could make it more difficult or costly for us to hire U.S. citizens and/or legal immigrant workers. In such case, we may incur additional costs to run our business or may have to change the way we conduct our operations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Also, despite our past and continuing efforts to hire only U.S. citizens and/or persons legally authorized to work in the U.S., we may be unable to ensure that all of our employees are U.S. citizens and/or persons legally authorized to work in the U.S. For example, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has investigated identity theft within our workforce. With our cooperation, during 2008 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested approximately 300 employees believed to have engaged in identity theft at five of our facilities. No assurances can be given that enforcement efforts by governmental authorities will not disrupt a portion of our workforce or operations at one or more facilities, thereby negatively impacting our business. Also, no assurance can be given that further enforcement efforts by governmental authorities will not result in the assessment of fines that could adversely affect our financial position, operating results or cash flows.



Our success is largely dependent on the skills, experience, and efforts of our management and other employees. The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management or of numerous employees with essential skills could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are not able to retain or attract talented, committed individuals to fill vacant positions when needs arise, it may adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives.

Our performance depends on favorable labor relations with our employees and our compliance with labor laws. Any deterioration of those relations or increase in labor costs due to our compliance with labor laws could adversely affect our business.

As of December 29, 2013, we employed approximately 31,600 persons in the U.S. and approximately 5,100 persons in Mexico. Approximately 35.3% of the Company’s employees were covered under collective bargaining agreements. Substantially all employees covered under collective bargaining agreements are covered under agreements that expire in 2015 or 2016 with the exception of one live operations location where the collective bargaining agreement expired in 2013 and negotiations are ongoing. We have not experienced any labor-related work stoppage at any location in over nine years. We believe our relationship with our employees and union leadership is satisfactory. At any given time, we will be in some stage of contract negotiations with various collective bargaining units. The Company is currently in negotiations at one location, and there is no assurance that agreement will be reached. In the absence of an agreement, we may become subject to labor disruption at this location, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

Extreme weather, natural disasters or other events beyond our control could negatively impact our business.

Bioterrorism, fire, pandemic, extreme weather or natural disasters, including droughts, floods, excessive cold or heat, hurricanes or other storms, could impair the health or growth of our flocks, production or availability of feed ingredients, or interfere with our operations due to power outages, fuel shortages, damage to our production and processing facilities or disruption of transportation channels, among other things. Any of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

We may face significant costs for compliance with existing or changing environmental, health and safety requirements and for potential environmental obligations relating to current or discontinued operations.

Our operations are subject to extensive and increasingly stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations pertaining to the protection of the environment, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, the handling, treatment and disposal of wastes and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination. Failure to comply with these requirements could have serious consequences for us, including criminal as well as civil and administrative penalties, claims for property damage, personal injury and damage to natural resources and negative publicity. Compliance with existing or changing environmental requirements, including more stringent limitations imposed or expected to be imposed in recently-renewed or soon-to-be renewed environmental permits, will require capital expenditures for installation of new or upgraded pollution control equipment at some of our facilities.

Operations at many of our facilities require the treatment and disposal of wastewater, stormwater and agricultural and food processing wastes, the use and maintenance of refrigeration systems, including ammonia-based chillers, noise, odor and dust management, the operation of mechanized processing equipment, and other operations that potentially could affect the environment, health and safety. Some of our facilities have been operating for many years, and were built before current environmental standards were imposed, and/or in areas that recently have become subject to residential and commercial development pressures. Failure to comply with current and future environmental, health and safety standards could result in the imposition of fines and penalties, and we have been subject to such sanctions from time to time. We are upgrading wastewater treatment facilities at a number of these locations, either pursuant to consent agreements with regulatory authorities or on a voluntary basis in anticipation of future permit requirements.

In the past, we have acquired businesses with operations such as pesticide and fertilizer production that involved greater use of hazardous materials and generation of more hazardous wastes than our current operations. While many of those operations have been sold or closed, some environmental laws impose strict and, in certain circumstances, joint and several liability for costs of investigation and remediation of contaminated sites on current and former owners and operators of the sites, and on persons who arranged for disposal of wastes at such sites. In addition, current owners or operators of such contaminated sites may seek to recover cleanup costs from us based on past operations or contractual indemnifications.



New environmental, health and safety requirements, stricter interpretations of existing requirements, or obligations related to the investigation or clean-up of contaminated sites, may materially affect our business or operations in the future.

JBS USA holds a majority of our common stock and has the ability to control the vote on most matters brought before the holders of our common stock.

JBS USA holds a majority of the shares and voting power of our common stock and is entitled to appoint a majority of the members of our board of directors. As a result, JBS USA will, subject to restrictions on its voting power and actions in a stockholders' agreement between us and JBS USA and our organization documents, have the ability to control our management, policies and financing decisions, elect a majority of the members of our board of directors at the annual meeting and control the vote on most matters coming before the holders of our common stock.

Under the stockholders agreement between us and JBS USA, JBS USA has the ability to elect up to six members of our board of directors and the other holders of our common stock have the ability to elect up to three members of our board of directors. If the percentage of our outstanding common stock owned by JBS USA exceeds 80%, then JBS USA would have the ability to elect one additional member of our board of directors while the other holders of our common stock would have the ability to elect one less member of our board of directors.

## Our operations are subject to general risks of litigation.

We are involved on an on-going basis in litigation with our independent contract growers or arising in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.” Trends in litigation may include class actions involving consumers, shareholders, employees or injured persons, and claims relating to commercial, labor, employment, antitrust, securities or environmental matters. Litigation trends and the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and adverse litigation trends and outcomes could adversely affect our financial results.

## We depend on contract growers and independent producers to supply us with livestock.

We contract primarily with independent contract growers to raise the live chickens processed in our poultry operations. If we do not attract and maintain contracts with growers or maintain marketing and purchasing relationships with independent producers, our production operations could be negatively affected.

## Changes in consumer preference could negatively impact our business.

The food industry in general is subject to changing consumer trends, demands and preferences. Trends within the food industry change often, and failure to identify and react to changes in these trends could lead to, among other things, reduced demand and price reductions for our products, and could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

## The consolidation of customers could negatively impact our business.

Our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs and food distributors, have consolidated in recent years, and consolidation is expected to continue throughout the U.S. and in other major markets. These consolidations have produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power who are more capable of operating with reduced inventories, opposing price increases, and demanding lower pricing, increased promotional programs and specifically tailored products. These customers also may use shelf space currently used for our products for their own private label products. Because of these trends, our volume growth could slow or we may need to lower prices or increase promotional spending for our products, any of which would adversely affect our financial results.

## Our future financial and operating flexibility may be adversely affected by our significant leverage.

We have substantial indebtedness, which could adversely affect our financial condition. On a consolidated basis, as of December 29, 2013, we had approximately $414.5 million in secured indebtedness, $497.8 million of unsecured indebtedness and had the ability to borrow approximately $665.8 million under our credit agreements. Significant amounts of cash flow will be necessary to make payments of interest and repay the principal amount of such indebtedness.

The degree to which we are leveraged could have important consequences because:

- It could affect our ability to satisfy our obligations under our credit agreements;

- A substantial portion of our cash flow from operations is required to be dedicated to interest and principal payments and may not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes;



- Our ability to obtain additional financing and to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements in the future may be impaired;

We may be more highly leveraged than some of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;

- Our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business may be limited;

- It may limit our ability to pursue acquisitions and sell assets; and

- It may make us more vulnerable in the event of a continued or new downturn in our business or the economy in general.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt, including our credit facilities, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to various business factors (including, among others, the commodity prices of feed ingredients and chicken) and general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available under our credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt obligations, including obligations under our credit facilities, or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of their debt on or before maturity. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any of their debt on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

## Media campaigns related to food production present risks.

Individuals or organizations can use social media platforms to publicize inappropriate or inaccurate stories or perceptions about the food production industry or our company. Such practices could cause damage to the reputations of our company and/or the food production industry in general. This damage could adversely affect our financial results.

## Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.



## Item 2. Properties

## Operating Facilities

Our main operating facilities are as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Operating</td><td>Idled</td><td>Capacity \( ^{(a)(b)} \)</td><td>Average Capacity Utilization \( ^{(b)} \)</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. Facilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fresh processing plants</td><td>24</td><td>5</td><td>32.5 million head</td><td>91.6%</td></tr><tr><td>Prepared foods cook plants</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>14.9 million pounds</td><td>95.6%</td></tr><tr><td>Feed mills</td><td>23</td><td>3</td><td>11.5 million tons</td><td>78.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Hatcheries</td><td>29</td><td>3</td><td>2,197.6 million eggs</td><td>71.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Rendering</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>8,186 tons</td><td>59.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Pet food processing</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>1,493 tons</td><td>52.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Freezers</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>125,000 square feet</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Puerto Rico Facilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fresh processing plant</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>350,000 head</td><td>92.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Feed mill</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>112,230 tons</td><td>71.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Hatchery</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>27.0 million eggs</td><td>65.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Rendering</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>100 tons</td><td>70.4%</td></tr><tr><td>Distribution center</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico Facilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Processing plants</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>2.8 million head</td><td>83.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Feed mills</td><td>4</td><td>—</td><td>1.15 million tons</td><td>73.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Hatcheries</td><td>6</td><td>—</td><td>240.3 million eggs</td><td>95.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Rendering</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>26,000 tons</td><td>93.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Distribution centers</td><td>12</td><td>—</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td></tr></table>

(a) Capacity is based on a five day week.

(b) Capacity and utilization numbers do not include idled facilities.

## Other Facilities and Information

In the U.S, our corporate offices share a building with JBS USA in Greeley, Colorado. We own a building in Richardson, Texas, which houses our computer data center; we also own office buildings in both Broadway, Virginia, and Pittsburgh, Texas, which house additional administrative, sales and marketing, research and development, and other support activities. We also lease office buildings in Bentonville, Arkansas; Louisville, Kentucky and Winchester, Virginia, for members of our sales team.

In Mexico, we own an office building in Mexico City, which houses our Mexican marketing office and we lease an office building in Querétaro, Mexico, which houses our Mexican administrative functions.

Most of our property, plant and equipment are pledged as collateral on our credit facilities. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

## Item 3. Legal Proceedings

## Grower Claims and Proceedings

Ricky Arnold et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., et al. On September 10, 2008, a lawsuit styled “Ricky Arnold, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., et al.” was filed against our Company and two of its representatives. In this lawsuit, filed in the Circuit Court of Van Buren County, Arkansas, nearly 100 contract poultry growers and their spouses assert claims of fraud and deceit, constructive fraud, fraud in the inducement, promissory estoppel, and violations of the Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Contract Protection Act relating to the idling of our Clinton, Arkansas processing plant. The total amount of damages sought by the contract poultry growers is unliquidated and unknown at this time. We filed a Notice of Suggestion of Bankruptcy. The court has not issued an order in response to it. The plaintiffs filed proofs of claim in the Bankruptcy Court, and we filed objections to the proofs of claim. The plaintiffs in the Arnold case, and a number of other growers from the Clinton, Arkansas facility filed proofs of claim in the bankruptcy case. The proofs of claim are being administered in a consolidated proceeding described under Growers Proofs of Claims, below. The consolidated matter, as discussed below, is now concluded.



Shelia Adams, et al. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation. On June 1, 2009, approximately 555 former and current independent contract broiler growers, their spouses and poultry farms filed an adversary proceeding against us in the Bankruptcy Court styled "Shelia Adams, et al. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation." In the adversary proceeding, the plaintiffs assert claims against us for: (i) violations of Sections 202(a), (b) and (e), 7 US C. § 192 of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 (the "PSA"); (ii) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (iii) violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("DTPA"); (iv) promissory estoppel; (v) simple fraud; and (vi) fraud by nondisclosure. The case relates to our Farmerville, Louisiana; Nacogdoches, Texas; and the El Dorado, De Queen and Batesville, Arkansas complexes. The plaintiffs also filed a motion to withdraw the reference of the adversary proceeding from the Bankruptcy Court to the U.S. District for the Eastern Court of Texas ("Marshall Court"). The motion was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas-Fort Worth Division (the "Fort Worth Court"). The Bankruptcy Court recommended the reference be withdrawn, but that the Fort Worth Court retain venue over the action to ensure against forum shopping. The Fort Worth Court granted the motion to withdraw the reference. We filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims. The Fort Worth Court granted in part and denied in part our motion, dismissing the following claims and ordering the plaintiffs to file a motion to amend their lawsuit and re-please their claims with further specificity or the claims would be dismissed with prejudice: (i) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (ii) promissory estoppel; (iii) simple fraud and fraudulent nondisclosure; and (iv) DTPA claims with respect to growers from Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana. The plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend on October 7, 2009. Plaintiffs' motion for leave was granted and the plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on December 7, 2009. Subsequent to the Fort Worth Court granting in part and denying in part our motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs filed a motion to transfer venue of the proceeding from the Fort Worth Court to the Marshall Court. We filed a response to the motion, but the motion to transfer was granted on December 17, 2009. On December 29, 2009, we filed our answer to plaintiffs' Amended Complaint with the Marshall Court. A bench trial commenced on June 16, 2011. The trial concluded as to the El Dorado growers on August 25, 2011. On September 30, 2011, the Marshall Court issued its Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Judgment finding in favor of the Company on each of the grower claims with exception of claims under 7 U.S.C. §192(e), and awarding damages to plaintiffs in the aggregate of approximately $25.8 million. Afterward, the Company filed post-judgment motions attacking the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, which, on December 28, 2011, were granted in part and resulted in a reduction of the damages award from $25.8 million to $25.6 million. On January 19, 2012, the Company appealed the findings of fact and conclusions of law and decision concerning the post-judgment motions to the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral argument occurred on December 3, 2012. On August 27, 2013, the Fifth Circuit reversed the judgment, and entered a judgment in favor of the Company. Plaintiffs thereafter filed a petition for rehearing en banc. Plaintiffs' petition for rehearing was denied on October 15, 2013. On January 13, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari requesting the Supreme Court of the United States to accept their case for review. The Company is awaiting a ruling from the Supreme Court on whether it will accept the case for review. If such petition is granted, the Company intends to vigorously pursue its appellate rights and defend against reinstatement of the underlying judgment of the trial court. The Fifth Circuit's decision and prior favorable trial court rulings regarding the El Dorado grower' claims suggest that the likelihood of any recovery by growers remaining in the case is too remote to maintain the previously-recorded loss accrual. Therefore, the Company reversed the accrual on September 1, 2013. As for the remaining claims, the bench trials relating to the allegations asserted by the plaintiffs from the Farmerville, Louisiana complex began on July 16, 2012. That bench trial concluded on August 2, 2012. The Marshall Court has not issued a decision. Additionally, the bench trials relating to the claims asserted by the plaintiffs from the Nacogdoches, Texas complex began on September 12, 2012. The trial has not concluded and the Marshall Court has not scheduled a date for resuming the trial. The remaining bench trial for the plaintiffs from the De Queen and Batesville, Arkansas complexes was scheduled for October 29, 2012, but that trial date was canceled. The Marshall Court has not scheduled new dates for that bench trial. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims. Although the likelihood of financial loss related to the remaining growers' claims is reasonably possible, an estimate of potential loss cannot be determined at this time because of now conflicting legal authority, the factual nature of the various growers' individual claims and a new judge who will preside over the remaining bench trials. There can be no assurances that other similar claims may not be brought against the Company.

Grower Proofs of Claim. Approximately 161 former independent contract broiler growers, their spouses and poultry farms filed proofs of claim against us relating to the idling of the Company’s El Dorado, Arkansas; Douglas, Georgia; Siler City and Sanford, North Carolina; and Athens, Alabama processing facilities. Eight of the growers also filed administrative claims against us. The growers’ claims include: (i) fraud; (ii) fraudulent inducement; (iii) violations of the Packers & Stockyards Act; (iv) breach of fiduciary duty; (v) promissory estoppel; (vi) equitable estoppel; (vii) restitution; and (viii) deceptive trade practices. The claims relate to the growers’ allegations that they were required to spend significant amounts improving their poultry farms in order to continue their contractual relationship with our Company and predecessor companies. On December 17, 2009, we filed objections to the proofs of claim and administrative claims. The parties have engaged in discovery. Since discovery commenced, we announced that we are reopening the Douglas, Georgia complex. Consequently, we circulated new poultry grower contracts with releases to those growers that own and/or operate poultry farms within or near Douglas, Georgia. Because numerous growers signed the poultry grower agreement that contained the release of their claims, approximately 133 of the 161 growers in this consolidated claims administration proceeding withdrew their proofs of claim and motions for administrative expense claims. There are currently approximately 48 growers in this proceeding. After engaging in discovery motion practice and a trial, the majority of the 48 growers’ claims were dismissed. The Company subsequently settled the remaining claims.



Numerous former independent contract growers located in our Clinton, Arkansas complex filed proofs of claim against us relating to the Arnold litigation referenced above. The claims include: (i) fraud and deceit; (ii) constructive fraud; (iii) fraud in the inducement; (iv) promissory estoppel; (v) a request for declaratory relief; and (vi) violations of the Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Contract Protection Act, and relate to the growers' allegations that they were required to spend significant amounts improving their poultry farms in order to continue their contractual relationship with our Company and predecessor companies prior to us idling our Clinton processing facility. Most of the growers in this consolidated claims administration proceeding were named plaintiffs in the case styled, "Ricky Arnold, et al. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, et al." discussed above. On November 30, 2009, we filed objections to the proofs of claim. On August 2, 2010, we filed numerous motions for summary judgment requesting the Bankruptcy Court to dismiss each grower's causes of action against our Company. In response to the dispositive motions, the growers conceded that their numerous fraud and statutory claims lacked merit; consequently, the parties recently submitted agreed orders dismissing these claims with prejudice. The sole remaining cause of action alleged by the growers against us is promissory estoppel. The hearing on our motions for summary judgment with respect to the promissory estoppel claims occurred on October 19, 2010. On December 15, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Company's summary judgment motion on 106 of the 107 growers' promissory estoppel claims. The Company settled with the grower whose claims were not dismissed for an immaterial amount. The growers whose claims were dismissed appealed the decision to the District Court, which, on December 19, 2011, affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's decision. On January 17, 2012, the growers appealed the District Court's decision to the United States Fifth Circuit of Court of Appeals. After briefing was complete, the Fifth Circuit, on January 31, 2013, affirmed the underlying judgment in favor of the Company and barred the growers' claims. Because the growers elected not to seek rehearing of the Fifth Circuit's decision and will not seek a further appeal, the case is now concluded.

## ERISA Claims and Proceedings

On December 17, 2008, Kenneth Patterson filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, against Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Clifford E. Butler, J. Clinton Rivers, Richard A. Cogdill, Renee N. DeBar, our Compensation Committee and other unnamed defendants (the “Patterson action”). On January 2, 2009, a nearly identical suit was filed by Denise M. Smalls in the same court against the same defendants (the “Smalls action”). The complaints in both actions, brought pursuant to section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 US C. § 1132, alleged that the individual defendants breached fiduciary duties to participants and beneficiaries of the Pilgrim’s Pride Stock Investment Plan (the “Stock Plan”), as administered through the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Savings Plan (the “RSP”), and the To-Ricos, Inc. Employee Savings and Retirement Plan (the “To-Ricos Plan”) (collectively, the “Plans”) by failing to sell the common stock held by the Plans before it declined in value in late 2008. Patterson and Smalls further alleged that they purported to represent a class of all persons or entities who were participants in or beneficiaries of the Plans at any time between May 5, 2008 through the present and whose accounts held our common stock or units in our common stock. Both complaints sought actual damages in the amount of any losses the Plans suffered, to be allocated among the participants’ individual accounts as benefits due in proportion to the accounts’ diminution in value, attorneys’ fees, an order for equitable restitution and the imposition of constructive trust, and a declaration that each of the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to the Plans’ participants.

On July 20, 2009, the Court entered an order consolidating the Smalls and Patterson actions. On August 12, 2009, the Court ordered that the consolidated case will proceed under the caption “In re Pilgrim’s Pride Stock Investment Plan ERISA Litigation, No. 2:08-cv-472-TJW.”

Patterson and Smalls filed a consolidated amended complaint (“Amended Complaint”) on March 2, 2010. The Amended Complaint names as defendants the Pilgrim’s Pride Board of Directors, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Charles L. Black, Linda Chavez, S. Key Coker, Keith W. Hughes, Blake D. Lovette, Vance C. Miller, James G. Vetter, Jr., Donald L. Wass, J. Clinton Rivers, Richard A. Cogdill, the Pilgrim’s Pride Pension Committee, Robert A. Wright, Jane Brookshire, Renee N. DeBar, the Pilgrim’s Pride Administrative Committee, Gerry Evenwel, Stacey Evans, Evelyn Boyden, and “John Does 1-10.” The Amended Complaint purports to assert claims on behalf of persons who were participants in or beneficiaries of the RSP or the To-Ricos Plan at any time between January 29, 2008 through December 1, 2008 (“the alleged class period”), and whose accounts included investments in the Company’s common stock.

Like the original Patterson and Smalls complaints, the Amended Complaint alleges that the defendants breached ERISA fiduciary duties to participants and beneficiaries of the RSP and To-Ricos Plan by permitting both Plans to continue investing in the Company’s common stock during the alleged class period. The Amended Complaint also alleges that certain defendants were “appointing” fiduciaries who failed to monitor the performance of the defendant-fiduciaries they appointed. Further, the Amended Complaint alleges that all defendants are liable as co-fiduciaries for one another’s alleged breaches. Plaintiffs seek actual damages in the amount of any losses the RSP and To-Ricos Plan attributable to the decline in the value of the common stock held by the Plans, to be allocated among the participants’ individual accounts as benefits due in proportion to the accounts’ alleged diminution in value, costs and attorneys’ fees, an order for equitable restitution and the imposition of constructive trust, and a declaration that each of the defendants have breached their ERISA fiduciary duties to the RSP and To-Ricos Plan’s participants.



The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on May 3, 2010. On August 29, 2012, the Magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation to deny the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on grounds that the complaint included too many exhibits. Defendants filed objections with the District Court, and on October 29, 2012, the District Court adopted the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and entered an order denying Defendants' motion to dismiss. On November 11, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. The motion is fully briefed and was argued to the Court on February 28, 2013. The parties are awaiting a decision on the motion.

## Tax Claims and Proceedings

The United States Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) filed an amended proof of claim in the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to which the IRS asserted claims that total $74.7 million. We filed in the Bankruptcy Court (i) an objection to the IRS’ amended proof of claim, and (ii) a motion requesting the Bankruptcy Court to determine our U.S. federal tax liability pursuant to Sections 105 and 505 of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. The objection and motion asserted that the Company had no liability for the additional U.S. federal taxes that have been asserted for pre-petition periods by the IRS. The IRS responded in opposition to our objection and motion. On July 8, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court granted our unopposed motion requesting that the Bankruptcy Court abstain from determining our federal tax liability. As a result we have worked with the IRS through the normal processes and procedures that are available to all taxpayers outside of bankruptcy including the United States Tax Court (“Tax Court”) proceedings discussed below) to resolve the IRS’ amended proof of claim. On December 13, 2012, we entered into two Stipulation of Settled Issues (“Stipulation” or “Stipulations”) with the IRS. The first Stipulation relates to the Company’s 2003, 2005, and 2007 tax years and resolves all of the material issues in the case. The second Stipulation relates to the Company as the successor in interest to Gold Kist Inc. (“Gold Kist”) for the tax years ended June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005, and resolves all substantive issues in the case. These Stipulations account for approximately $29.3 million of the amended proof of claim and should result in no additional tax due.

In connection with the amended proof of claim, on May 26, 2010, we filed a petition in Tax Court in response to a Notice of Deficiency that was issued to the Company as the successor in interest to Gold Kist. The Notice of Deficiency and the Tax Court proceeding relate to a loss that Gold Kist claimed for its tax year ended June 30, 2004. On December 11, 2013, the Tax Court issued its opinion in the Tax Court Case holding the loss that Gold Kist claimed for its tax year ended June 30, 2004 is capital in nature. On January 10, 2014, PPC filed both a Motion for Reconsideration and a Motion for Full Tax Court review of both its Motion for Reconsideration and any order issued in response to such motion. On January 15, 2014, the Tax Court issued an order requesting the IRS to respond to PPC’s Motion for Reconsideration on or before February 18, 2014. The Company intends to vigorously pursue its appellate rights. This proceeding accounts for approximately $45.4 million of the amended proof of claim.

We express no opinion as to the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the amount or range of any possible loss to us related to the above Tax Court case related to Gold Kist’s tax year ended June 30, 2004. If adversely determined, the outcome could have a material effect on the Company’s operating results and financial position.

## Other Claims and Proceedings

We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

## Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.



## PART II

## Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

## Market Information

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “PPC.” Until December 27, 2012, our common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”) under the symbol “PPC.” High and low prices of the Company’s common stock for 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Quarter</td><td colspan="3">2013 Prices</td><td colspan="3">2012 Prices</td></tr><tr><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Low</td></tr><tr><td>First</td><td>$ 9.29</td><td>$ 7.24</td><td>$ 7.73</td><td>$ 5.17</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Second</td><td>$ 14.94</td><td>$ 8.75</td><td>$ 8.56</td><td>$ 6.59</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Third</td><td>$ 18.58</td><td>$ 14.69</td><td>$ 7.52</td><td>$ 4.54</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fourth</td><td>$ 16.82</td><td>$ 13.92</td><td>$ 7.49</td><td>$ 4.28</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

## Holders

The Company estimates there were approximately 21,000 holders (including individual participants in security position listings) of the Company’s common stock as of February 19, 2014.

## Dividends

The Company did not pay dividends in 2013 or 2012. We have no current plans to pay cash dividends. Any change in dividend policy will depend upon future conditions, including earnings and financial condition, general business conditions, any applicable contractual limitations, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors in its discretion. Our U.S. credit facility and the indenture governing our 7 \( ^{1}/_{8} \) % senior notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) restrict, but do not prohibit, us from declaring dividends.

## Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities in 2013

The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities in 2013.

## Total Return on Registrant’s Common Equity

The following graph compares the performance of the Company with that of the Russell 2000 composite index and a peer group of companies for the period from December 29, 2009 to December 29, 2013, with the investment weighted on market capitalization. Data for periods prior to December 29, 2009 is not shown because we were in bankruptcy prior to that date and financial results before and after December 29, 2009 are not comparable. The total cumulative return on investment (change in the year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends) for each of the periods for the Company, the Russell 2000 composite index and the peer group is based on the stock price or composite index at the beginning of the applicable period. Companies in the peer group index include Sanderson Farms Inc., Hormel Foods Corp. and Tyson Foods Inc.

The graph covers the period from December 29, 2009 to December 29, 2013, and reflects the performance of the Company’s single class of common stock. The stock price performance represented by this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.




*$100 invested on 12/29/09 in stock index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 29.

<table><tr><td></td><td>12/29/09</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>01/31/10</td><td>02/28/10</td><td>03/31/10</td><td>04/30/10</td><td>05/31/10</td><td>06/30/10</td><td>07/31/10</td><td>08/31/10</td><td>09/30/10</td><td>10/31/10</td><td>11/30/10</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>PPC</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 95.50</td><td>$ 95.17</td><td>$ 96.78</td><td>$ 114.17</td><td>$ 125.11</td><td>$ 85.62</td><td>$ 70.49</td><td>$ 73.50</td><td>$ 67.17</td><td>$ 60.30</td><td>$ 65.45</td><td>$ 71.25</td><td>$ 76.07</td></tr><tr><td>Russell</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2000</td><td>100.00</td><td>98.78</td><td>95.14</td><td>99.43</td><td>107.52</td><td>113.60</td><td>104.99</td><td>96.85</td><td>103.51</td><td>95.84</td><td>107.78</td><td>112.20</td><td>116.09</td><td>125.30</td></tr><tr><td>Peer</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Group</td><td>100.00</td><td>98.30</td><td>104.64</td><td>118.48</td><td>127.19</td><td>127.82</td><td>120.07</td><td>116.37</td><td>122.51</td><td>118.60</td><td>119.50</td><td>119.84</td><td>125.61</td><td>131.70</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>01/31/11</td><td>02/28/11</td><td>03/31/11</td><td>04/30/11</td><td>05/31/11</td><td>06/30/11</td><td>07/31/11</td><td>08/31/11</td><td>09/30/11</td><td>10/31/11</td><td>11/30/11</td><td>12/25/11</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PPC</td><td>$ 74.89</td><td>$ 82.73</td><td>$ 82.73</td><td>$ 63.09</td><td>$ 53.33</td><td>$ 58.05</td><td>$ 51.50</td><td>$ 37.34</td><td>$ 45.82</td><td>$ 54.08</td><td>$ 61.59</td><td>$ 64.27</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Russell 2000</td><td>124.98</td><td>131.83</td><td>135.25</td><td>138.82</td><td>136.22</td><td>133.08</td><td>128.27</td><td>117.11</td><td>103.98</td><td>119.72</td><td>119.28</td><td>121.13</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Peer Group</td><td>127.56</td><td>141.88</td><td>145.85</td><td>153.07</td><td>149.43</td><td>152.86</td><td>144.71</td><td>139.30</td><td>139.19</td><td>152.63</td><td>157.77</td><td>156.76</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>01/31/12</td><td>02/29/12</td><td>03/31/12</td><td>04/30/12</td><td>05/31/12</td><td>06/30/12</td><td>07/31/12</td><td>08/31/12</td><td>09/30/12</td><td>10/31/12</td><td>11/30/12</td><td>12/30/12</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PPC</td><td>$ 60.25</td><td>$ 70.21</td><td>$ 83.54</td><td>$ 79.96</td><td>$ 91.94</td><td>$ 80.07</td><td>$ 52.07</td><td>$ 59.57</td><td>$ 57.22</td><td>$ 63.05</td><td>$ 79.96</td><td>$ 80.52</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Russell 2000</td><td>128.55</td><td>131.63</td><td>135.00</td><td>132.92</td><td>124.12</td><td>130.31</td><td>128.51</td><td>132.80</td><td>137.16</td><td>134.18</td><td>134.90</td><td>136.86</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Peer Group</td><td>149.70</td><td>149.44</td><td>154.00</td><td>150.01</td><td>156.83</td><td>154.36</td><td>133.70</td><td>139.91</td><td>142.62</td><td>146.54</td><td>159.18</td><td>160.36</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>01/31/13</td><td>02/28/13</td><td>03/31/13</td><td>04/30/13</td><td>05/31/13</td><td>06/30/13</td><td>07/31/13</td><td>08/31/13</td><td>09/30/13</td><td>10/31/13</td><td>11/30/13</td><td>12/29/13</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PPC</td><td>$ 94.62</td><td>$ 98.66</td><td>$ 102.91</td><td>$ 109.63</td><td>$ 133.93</td><td>$ 167.30</td><td>$ 186.11</td><td>$ 171.67</td><td>$ 187.91</td><td>$ 158.68</td><td>$ 183.43</td><td>$ 184.43</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Russell 2000</td><td>148.45</td><td>150.08</td><td>157.01</td><td>156.44</td><td>162.69</td><td>161.86</td><td>173.19</td><td>167.68</td><td>178.38</td><td>182.87</td><td>190.20</td><td>193.49</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Peer Group</td><td>179.64</td><td>189.56</td><td>208.35</td><td>209.76</td><td>208.88</td><td>207.42</td><td>225.62</td><td>225.99</td><td>225.91</td><td>227.88</td><td>246.41</td><td>253.00</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>



<table><tr><td colspan="10">(In thousands, except ratios and per share data)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011(a)</td><td>2010(a)</td><td colspan="3">Three Months Ended</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement Data:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Dec 27, 2009(a)</td><td>Dec 27, 2008</td><td>2009(a)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 7,535,698</td><td>$ 6,881,629</td><td>$ 1,602,734</td><td>$ 1,876,991</td><td>$ 7,088,055</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit (loss)(b)</td><td>845,439</td><td>435,832</td><td>(141,537)</td><td>460,993</td><td>68,753</td><td>(100,142)</td><td>310,803</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating income (loss)(b)</td><td>658,863</td><td>250,342</td><td>(373,591)</td><td>185,427</td><td>7,589</td><td>(178,241)</td><td>67,327</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense, net</td><td>84,881</td><td>103,529</td><td>110,067</td><td>101,748</td><td>44,193</td><td>39,569</td><td>157,543</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Loss on early extinguishment of debt</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>11,726</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reorganization items, net</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>18,541</td><td>32,726</td><td>13,250</td><td>87,275</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(b)</td><td>573,940</td><td>153,062</td><td>(487,126)</td><td>66,488</td><td>(68,446)</td><td>(229,091)</td><td>(173,849)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)(c)</td><td>24,227</td><td>(20,980)</td><td>8,564</td><td>(23,838)</td><td>(102,371)</td><td>278</td><td>(21,586)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations(b)</td><td>549,713</td><td>174,042</td><td>(495,690)</td><td>90,326</td><td>33,925</td><td>(229,369)</td><td>(152,263)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>158</td><td>(192)</td><td>1,082</td><td>3,185</td><td>312</td><td>(13)</td><td>(82)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation(b)</td><td>549,555</td><td>174,234</td><td>(496,772)</td><td>87,141</td><td>33,613</td><td>(228,782)</td><td>(151,582)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(f)</td><td>7.47x</td><td>2.34x</td><td>(d)</td><td>1.49x</td><td>(d)</td><td>(d)</td><td>(d)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="10">Per Common Diluted Share Data:</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.12</td><td>$ 0.70</td><td>$ (2.20)</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.15</td><td>$ (1.02)</td><td>$ (0.68)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>2.12</td><td>0.70</td><td>(2.21)</td><td>0.39</td><td>0.15</td><td>(1.02)</td><td>(0.67)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Book value</td><td>5.75</td><td>3.50</td><td>2.59</td><td>5.01</td><td>2.58</td><td>1.75</td><td>2.04</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="10">Balance Sheet Summary:</td></tr><tr><td>Working capital</td><td>845,584</td><td>812,551</td><td>747,020</td><td>971,830</td><td>675,256</td><td>757,862</td><td>858,030</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>3,172,402</td><td>2,913,869</td><td>2,879,545</td><td>3,218,898</td><td>3,209,463</td><td>3,215,135</td><td>3,060,504</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt(e)</td><td>410,234</td><td>15,886</td><td>15,611</td><td>58,144</td><td>221,195</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt, less current maturities(e)</td><td>501,999</td><td>1,148,870</td><td>1,408,001</td><td>1,281,160</td><td>1,876,277</td><td>41,521</td><td>41,062</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>1,492,602</td><td>908,997</td><td>558,430</td><td>1,072,663</td><td>191,952</td><td>129,420</td><td>150,920</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="10">Cash Flow Summary:</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 878,533</td><td>$ 199,624</td><td>$ (128,991)</td><td>$ 14,605</td><td>$ (4,057)</td><td>$ (168,674)</td><td>$ 64,934</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization(f)</td><td>150,523</td><td>147,414</td><td>209,061</td><td>231,045</td><td>56,705</td><td>60,158</td><td>236,005</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Impairment of goodwill and other assets</td><td>4,004</td><td>2,770</td><td>22,895</td><td>26,484</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5,409</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Purchases of investment securities</td><td>(96,902)</td><td>(162)</td><td>(4,596)</td><td>(17,201)</td><td>(6,024)</td><td>(5,629)</td><td>(19,958)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from sale or maturity of investment securities</td><td>—</td><td>688</td><td>15,852</td><td>68,100</td><td>4,511</td><td>4,591</td><td>18,946</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment</td><td>(116,223)</td><td>(90,327)</td><td>(135,968)</td><td>(179,332)</td><td>(30,463)</td><td>(29,028)</td><td>(88,193)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from financing activities</td><td>(250,214)</td><td>(111,029)</td><td>126,850</td><td>(29,480)</td><td>48,250</td><td>223,595</td><td>101,153</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="10">Other Data:</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA(g)</td><td>$ 800,398</td><td>$ 393,942</td><td>$ (174,801)</td><td>$ 384,484</td><td>$ 31,015</td><td>$ (130,906)</td><td>$ 212,911</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Adjusted EBITDA(g)</td><td>805,901</td><td>402,583</td><td>(147,014)</td><td>481,906</td><td>64,947</td><td>(115,221)</td><td>314,719</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="10">Key Indicators (as a percent of net sales):</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit (loss)(b)</td><td>10.1%</td><td>5.4%</td><td>(1.9)%</td><td>6.7%</td><td>4.3%</td><td>(5.3)%</td><td>4.4%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>2.2%</td><td>2.2%</td><td>2.7%</td><td>3.0%</td><td>3.9%</td><td>3.9%</td><td>3.4%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating income (loss)(b)</td><td>7.8%</td><td>3.1%</td><td>(5.0)%</td><td>2.7%</td><td>0.5%</td><td>(9.5)%</td><td>0.9%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense, net</td><td>1.0%</td><td>1.3%</td><td>1.5%</td><td>1.5%</td><td>2.8%</td><td>2.1%</td><td>2.2%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations(b)</td><td>6.5%</td><td>2.1%</td><td>(6.6)%</td><td>1.3%</td><td>2.1%</td><td>(12.2)%</td><td>(2.1)%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)(b)</td><td>6.5%</td><td>2.1%</td><td>(6.6)%</td><td>1.3%</td><td>2.1%</td><td>(12.2)%</td><td>(2.1)%</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) In December 2009, we changed our fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest September 30 of each year to the last Sunday in December of each year. The change was effective for our 2010 fiscal year, which began December 28, 2009 and ended December 26, 2010 and resulted in an approximate three-month transition period which began September 27, 2009 and ended December 27, 2009, which we sometimes refer to as the Transition Period. The reader should assume any reference we make to a particular year (for example, 2012) in this annual report applies to our fiscal year and not the calendar year.



(b) Gross profit, operating income and net income include the following nonrecurring recoveries, restructuring charges and other unusual items for each of the years presented:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="7">Three Months Ended</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>Dec 27, 2009</td><td>Dec 27, 2008</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In millions)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Effect on gross profit and operating income:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operational restructuring charges</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (2.0)</td><td>$ (4.3)</td><td>$ (2.9)</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (12.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Additional effect on operating income:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill impairment</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges</td><td>(5.7)</td><td>(8.4)</td><td>(26.9)</td><td>(66.0)</td><td>1.4</td><td>(2.4)</td><td>(2.0)</td></tr></table>

(c) Income tax expense in 2013 resulted primarily from expense recorded on our year-to-date income offset by a decrease in valuation allowance as a result of year-to-date earnings. Income tax benefit in 2012 resulted primarily from a decrease in valuation allowance and a decrease in reserves for unrecognized tax benefits. Income tax expense in 2011 resulted primarily from an increase in valuation allowance and an increase in reserves for unrecognized tax benefits. Income tax benefit in 2010 resulted primarily from the benefit on the deconsolidation for tax purposes of the Mexico operations and a decrease in valuation allowance. The deconsolidation for tax purposes of the Mexico operations was in response to changes in the Mexican tax laws that became effective January 1, 2010. The deconsolidation reduces the accrued taxes that had been previously recognized under the consolidated filing status as it eliminates recapturing certain taxes required under the new consolidation laws. Income tax benefit for the Transition Period resulted primarily from the release of valuation allowance because of new provisions that increased U.S. federal net operating loss carry backs net of tax expense for new Mexico tax legislation. Income tax expense for the thirteen weeks ended December 27, 2008 resulted primarily from an increase in valuation allowance. Income tax benefit in 2009 resulted primarily from a decrease in reserves for unrecognized tax benefits.

(d) For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income before income taxes plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest). Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalized interest) on all indebtedness, amortization of capitalized financing costs and that portion of rental expense that we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $490.6 million, $69.5 million, $229.8 million, and $176.5 million, in 2011, the Transition Period, the three months ended December 27, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

(e) The Company had current maturities of pre-petition long-term debt totaling $4.2 million and pre-petition long-term debt totaling $1,999.8 million at September 26, 2009, that were included in Liabilities subject to compromise.

(f) Includes amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $9.3 million, $10.1 million, $9.5 million, $14.8 million, $1.4 million, $1.5 million, and $6.8 million in 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, the Transition Period, the three months ended December 27, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

(g) “EBITDA” is defined as the sum of income (loss) from continuing operations plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. “Adjusted EBITDA” is calculated by adding to EBITDA certain items of expense and deducting from EBITDA certain items of income that we believe are not indicative of our ongoing operating performance consisting of: (i) income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in the period from 2009 through 2013 and the Transition Period, (ii) restructuring charges in 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009, (iii) reorganization items in 2010 and 2009 and (iv) losses on early extinguishment of debt in 2010. EBITDA is presented because it is used by us and we believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, in addition to and not in lieu of results prepared in conformity with GAAP, to compare the performance of companies. We believe investors would be interested in our Adjusted EBITDA because this is how our management analyzes EBITDA from continuing operations. We also believe that Adjusted EBITDA, in combination with our financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP, provides investors with additional perspective regarding the impact of certain significant items on EBITDA and facilitates a more direct comparison of its performance with its competitors. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of financial performance under GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations of these measures are:

• They do not reflect our cash expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

• They do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• They do not reflect the significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt;

- Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

• They are not adjusted for all non-cash income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of cash flows;

• EBITDA does not reflect the impact of earnings or charges attributable to noncontrolling interests;

• They do not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider to not be indicative of our ongoing operations; and

• They do not reflect limitations on or costs related to transferring earnings from our subsidiaries to us.

In addition, other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net income as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. You should compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only on a supplemental basis.



A reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td rowspan="3">2013</td><td rowspan="3">2012</td><td rowspan="3">2011</td><td rowspan="3">2010</td><td colspan="3">Three Months Ended</td><td rowspan="3">2009</td></tr><tr><td>Dec 27, 2009</td><td>Dec 27, 2008</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 549,713</td><td>$ 174,042</td><td>$ (495,690)</td><td>$ 90,326</td><td>$ 33,925</td><td>$ (229,367)</td><td>$ (152,263)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Add:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense, net (a)</td><td>84,881</td><td>103,529</td><td>110,067</td><td>101,748</td><td>44,193</td><td>39,569</td><td>157,543</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>24,227</td><td>(20,980)</td><td>8,564</td><td>(23,838)</td><td>(102,371)</td><td>278</td><td>(21,586)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization of continuing operations (b)</td><td>150,884</td><td>147,414</td><td>211,780</td><td>231,045</td><td>56,705</td><td>60,158</td><td>236,005</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Minus:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of capitalized financing costs (c)</td><td>9,307</td><td>10,063</td><td>9,522</td><td>14,797</td><td>1,437</td><td>1,544</td><td>6,788</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>800,398</td><td>393,942</td><td>(174,801)</td><td>384,484</td><td>31,015</td><td>(130,906)</td><td>212,911</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Add:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restructuring charges (d)</td><td>5,661</td><td>8,449</td><td>28,869</td><td>70,340</td><td>1,518</td><td>2,422</td><td>14,451</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reorganization items, net (e)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>18,541</td><td>32,726</td><td>13,250</td><td>87,275</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Loss on early extinguishment of debt (f)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>11,726</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Minus:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>158</td><td>(192)</td><td>1,082</td><td>3,185</td><td>312</td><td>(13)</td><td>(82)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Adjusted EBITDA</td><td>$ 805,901</td><td>$ 402,583</td><td>$ (147,014)</td><td>$ 481,906</td><td>$ 64,947</td><td>$ (115,221)</td><td>$ 314,719</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) Interest expense, net, consists of interest expense less interest income.

(b) 2013 and 2011 include $0.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of asset impairments not included in restructuring charges.

(c) Amortization of capitalized financing costs is included in both interest expense, net and depreciation and amortization above.

(d) Restructuring charges includes tangible asset impairment, severance and change-in-control compensation costs, and losses incurred on both the sale of unneeded broiler eggs and flock depletion.

(e) Reorganization items, net, includes professional fees directly related to our reorganization, the elimination of unamortized loan costs associated with certain of our terminated borrowing arrangements, the recognition in earnings of a previously unrealized gain on a derivative instrument purchased to hedge interest rate risk related to certain of our terminated borrowing arrangements, expenses related to the execution of a borrowing arrangement during our reorganization, costs related to post-petition facility closures, gains recognized on the sales of a processing facility and undeveloped land and a loss recognized on the sale of our interest in a hog farming joint venture.

(f) Loss on early extinguishment of debt includes premiums paid and the elimination of unamortized loan costs related to the retirement of certain of our unsecured notes.



## Description of the Company

We are one of the largest chicken producers in the world with operations in the U.S., Mexico and Puerto Rico. We are primarily engaged in the production, processing, marketing and distribution of fresh, frozen and value-added chicken products to retailers, distributors and foodservice operators. Our primary product types are fresh chicken products, prepared chicken products and export chicken products. We sell our fresh chicken products to the foodservice and retail markets. We sell our prepared food products to foodservice customers and retail distributors. We also export products to customers in approximately 100 countries, including Mexico. As a vertically integrated company, we control every phase of the production of our products. We operate feed mills, hatcheries, processing plants and distribution centers in 12 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Mexico. We operate in one reportable business segment, as a producer and seller of chicken products we either produce or purchase for resale. Our fresh chicken products consist of refrigerated (nonfrozen) whole or cut-up chicken, either pre-marinated or non-marinated, and prepackaged chicken in various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts. Our prepared chicken products include portion-controlled breast fillets, tenderloins and strips, delicatessen products, salads, formed nuggets and patties and bone-in chicken parts. These products are sold either refrigerated or frozen and may be fully cooked, partially cooked or raw. In addition, these products are breaded or non-breaded and either pre-marinated or non-marinated.

We have a broad geographic reach and we offer our diverse customer base a balanced portfolio of fresh and prepared chicken products. We have consistently provided our customers with high quality products and service with a focus on delivering higher-value, higher-quality products. As such, we have become a valuable partner to our customers and a recognized industry leader. Our sales efforts are largely targeted towards the foodservice industry, principally chain restaurants, food processors and broad-line distributors. In 2013, we sold 7.2 billion pounds of dressed chicken and generated net sales of $8.4 billion. Our U.S. operations, including Puerto Rico, accounted for 89.2% of our net sales in 2013. Our Mexico operations generated the remaining 10.8% of our net sales in 2013.

We operate on the basis of a 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on the Sunday falling on or before December 31. The reader should assume any reference we make to a particular year (for example, 2013) in this annual report applies to our fiscal year and not the calendar year.

## Executive Summary

We reported net income attributable to Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation of $549.6 million, or $2.12 per diluted common share, for 2013. These operating results included gross profit of $845.4 million. During 2013, we generated $878.5 million of cash from operations. At December 29, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $508.2 million.



Market prices for corn decreased during the latter half of 2013 to a low of $4.12 per bushel and soybean meal continued its volatility with a high of $535.30 per ton and a low of $391.80 per ton during 2013. Market prices for feed ingredients remain volatile. Consequently, there can be no assurance that our feed ingredient prices will not increase materially and that such increases would not negatively impact our financial position, results of operations and cash flow. The following table compares the highest and lowest prices reached on nearby futures for one bushel of corn and one ton of soybean meal during the current year and previous two years:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="3">Corn</td><td colspan="3">Soybean Meal</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Highest</td><td>Lowest</td><td colspan="2">Highest</td><td>Lowest</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>Price</td><td>Price</td><td>Price</td><td>Price</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2013:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fourth Quarter</td><td>$     4.49</td><td>$     4.12</td><td>$     464.60</td><td>$     392.80</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Third Quarter</td><td>7.17</td><td>4.49</td><td>535.30</td><td>396.00</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Second Quarter</td><td>7.18</td><td>6.29</td><td>490.30</td><td>391.80</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>First Quarter</td><td>7.41</td><td>6.80</td><td>438.50</td><td>398.20</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2012:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fourth Quarter</td><td>8.46</td><td>6.88</td><td>518.00</td><td>393.00</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Third Quarter</td><td>8.49</td><td>5.70</td><td>541.80</td><td>407.50</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Second Quarter</td><td>6.77</td><td>5.51</td><td>437.50</td><td>374.30</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>First Quarter</td><td>6.79</td><td>5.93</td><td>374.50</td><td>299.00</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2011:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fourth Quarter</td><td>6.66</td><td>5.72</td><td>332.20</td><td>273.50</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Third Quarter</td><td>7.65</td><td>6.17</td><td>382.20</td><td>325.80</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Second Quarter</td><td>7.99</td><td>6.40</td><td>378.50</td><td>338.00</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>First Quarter</td><td>7.35</td><td>5.95</td><td>391.00</td><td>340.00</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

We purchase derivative financial instruments, specifically exchange-traded futures and options, in an attempt to mitigate price risk related to our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs such as corn, soybean meal, sorghum, wheat, soybean oil and natural gas. We will sometimes take a short position on a derivative instrument to minimize the impact of a commodity's price volatility on our operating results. We will also occasionally purchase derivative financial instruments in an attempt to mitigate currency exchange rate exposure related to the financial statements of our Mexico operations that are denominated in Mexican pesos. We do not designate derivative financial instruments that we purchase to mitigate commodity purchase exposures as cash flow hedges; therefore, we recognize changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments immediately in earnings. We recognized $25.1 million, $8.3 million and $63.8 million in net gains related to changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Although changes in the market price paid for feed ingredients impact cash outlays at the time we purchase the ingredients, such changes do not immediately impact cost of sales. The cost of feed ingredients is recognized in cost of sales, on a first-in-first-out basis, at the same time that the sales of the chickens that consume the feed grains are recognized. Thus, there is a lag between the time cash is paid for feed ingredients and the time the cost of such feed ingredients is reported in cost of goods sold. For example, corn delivered to a feed mill and paid for one week might be used to manufacture feed the following week. However, the chickens that eat that feed might not be processed and sold for another 42-63 days, and only at that time will the costs of the feed consumed by the chicken become included in cost of goods sold.

Commodities such as corn, soybean meal, sorghum, wheat and soybean oil are actively traded through various exchanges with future market prices quoted on a daily basis. These quoted market prices, although a good indicator of the commodity's base price, do not represent the final price for which we can purchase these commodities. There are several components in addition to the quoted market price, such as freight, storage and seller premiums, that are included in the final price that we pay for grain. Although changes in quoted market prices may be a good indicator of the commodity's base price, the components mentioned above may have a larger impact on the total change in grain costs recognized from period to period. The prices related to the other components were especially high this year as we transitioned from a year of record low grain stocks, primarily caused by drought conditions, to a year with normal grain stocks.

Market prices for chicken products are currently at levels sufficient to offset the costs of feed ingredients. However, there can be no assurance that chicken prices will not decrease due to such factors as competition from other proteins and substitutions by consumers of non-protein foods because of uncertainty surrounding the general economy and unemployment.

From time to time, we incur costs to implement exit or disposal efforts for specific operations. These exit or disposal plans focus on various aspects of operations, including closing and consolidating certain processing facilities, rationalizing headcount and aligning operations in the most strategic and cost-efficient structure. During 2013, we recognized total costs of $5.7 million, which included asset impairment costs of $3.7 million and other costs of $2.0 million, related to exit or disposal efforts. During 2012, we recognized total costs of $8.7 million, which included asset impairment costs of $2.8 million, inventory valuation costs of $0.1 million, employee-related costs of $0.1 million and other costs of $5.7 million, related to exit or disposal efforts. We expect to incur additional costs related to ongoing exit or disposal efforts, which we estimate will be approximately $3.0 million in 2014.



We continue to review and evaluate various restructuring and other alternatives to streamline our operations, improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Such initiatives may include selling assets, consolidating operations and functions, employee relocation and voluntary and involuntary employee separation programs. Any such actions may require us to obtain the pre-approval of the lenders under our credit facilities. In addition, such actions will subject us to additional short-term costs, which may include asset impairment charges, lease commitment costs, employee retention and severance costs and other costs. Certain of these activities may have a disproportionate impact on our income relative to the cost savings.

Trade authorities in Mexico, the top international market for U.S. chicken in recent years, completed an investigation of U.S. producers over dumping complaints lodged by certain Mexican chicken processors. These Mexican chicken processors alleged U.S. producers sold chicken legs and thighs on the Mexican market below their cost of production in 2010. On August 6, 2012, the Mexican government issued final resolutions imposing duties on our company and certain other U.S. chicken producers. Mexico will impose a duty of approximately 25% on chicken legs and thighs exported by our company and three other U.S. exporters and duties of approximately 127% on chicken legs and thighs exported by all other U.S. companies from the U.S. to Mexico. However, the Mexican government has postponed the imposition of these duties until conditions in Mexico’s domestic chicken market resulting from the outbreak of H7N3 avian influenza in the Mexican state of Jalisco have normalized. On September 3, 2012, we and certain other U.S. producers filed a request with the NAFTA Secretariat for a panel review of Mexico’s decision. Management does not believe that these duties, when imposed, will materially impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

## Business Segment and Geographic Reporting

We operate in one reportable business segment, as a producer and seller of chicken products we either produce or purchase for resale in the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico. We conduct separate operations in the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico; however, for geographic reporting purposes, we include Puerto Rico with our U.S. operations. Corporate expenses are allocated to Mexico based upon various apportionment methods for specific expenditures incurred related thereto with the remaining amounts allocated to the U.S.

## Results of Operations

## 2013 Compared to 2012

Net sales. Net sales for 2013 increased $289.8 million, or 3.6%, from 2012. The following table provides additional information regarding net sales:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Source of net sales</td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="3">Change from 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 7,500,212</td><td>$ 250,727</td><td>3.5% (a)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>910,936</td><td>39,039</td><td>4.5% (b)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total net sales</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 289,766</td><td>3.6%</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) U.S. sales generated in 2013 increased $250.7 million, or 3.5%, from U.S. sales generated in 2012, despite a decrease in the number of weeks included in the fiscal year from 53 in 2012 to 52 in 2013, primarily because of an increase in the net revenue per pound sold that was partially offset by a decrease in pounds sold. Increased net revenue per pound sold, which resulted primarily from an increase in market prices due to continued healthy demand for chicken products in combination with constrained supply, contributed $484.3 million, or 6.7 percentage points, to the revenue increase. A decrease in pounds sold partially offset the increase in revenue per pound sold by $233.6 million, or 3.2 percentage points. Included in U.S. sales generated during 2013 and 2012 were sales to JBS USA, LLC totaling $61.9 million and $206.7 million, respectively.

(b) Mexico sales generated in 2013 increased $39.0 million, or 4.5%, from Mexico sales generated in 2012, despite a decrease in the number of weeks included in the respective fiscal years, primarily because of the favorable impact of foreign currency translation and an increase in market prices that were partially offset by a decrease in unit sales volume. The favorable impact of foreign currency translation contributed $28.3 million, or 3.2 percentage points, to the revenue increase. An increase in market prices contributed $19.8 million, or 2.3 percentage points to the revenue increase. A decrease in pounds sold partially offset the favorable impact of foreign currency translation and the increase in market prices by $9.1 million, or 1.0 percentage points, and resulted primarily from the lack of broiler eggs following the H7N3 influenza outbreak in Mexico in late 2012 and early 2013.



Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $409.6 million, or 94.0%, from $435.8 million generated in 2012 to $845.4 million generated in 2013. The following tables provide gross profit information:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3">Components of gross profit</td><td rowspan="3">2013</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2012</td><td colspan="2">Percent of Net Sales</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 289,766</td><td>3.6%</td><td>100.0%</td><td>100.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>7,565,709</td><td>(119,841)</td><td>(1.6)%</td><td>89.9%</td><td>94.6% (a) (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>$ 845,439</td><td>$ 409,607</td><td>94.0%</td><td>10.1%</td><td>5.4%</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Sources of gross profit</td><td colspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 717,864</td><td>$ 385,253</td><td>115.8%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>128,455</td><td>25,234</td><td>24.4%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Elimination</td><td>(880)</td><td>(880)</td><td>—%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total gross profit</td><td>$ 845,439</td><td>$ 409,607</td><td>94.0%</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Sources of cost of sales</td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 6,782,348</td><td>$ (134,526)</td><td>(1.9)% (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>$ 782,481</td><td>$ 13,805</td><td>1.8% (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Elimination</td><td>$ 880</td><td>$ 880</td><td>—%</td></tr><tr><td>Total cost of sales</td><td>$ 7,565,709</td><td>$ (119,841)</td><td>(1.6)%</td></tr></table>

(a) Cost of sales incurred by our U.S. operations in 2013 decreased $134.5 million, or 1.9%, from cost of sales incurred by our U.S. operations in 2012. Along with a decrease in the number of weeks included in the respective fiscal years, the reduction in cost of sales resulted from (i) a $57.9 million decrease in co-pack labor and meat, which resulted primarily from the decrease in sales volume, (ii) a $24.1 million decrease in insurance costs resulting primarily from improved workers compensation loss performance, (iii) a $14.6 million decrease in live production costs, which were lower primarily because of a reduction in feed ingredient costs, (iv) a $13.6 million increase in derivative gains, (v) the August 2012 disposal of our commercial egg business, which incurred cost of sales totaling $12.0 million in 2012, (vi) a $10.1 million decrease in freight and storage costs, (vii) a $9.7 million decrease in compensation and employee relations costs and (viii) a $5.2 million decrease in rental and lease costs. Other factors affecting U.S. cost of sales were immaterial.

(b) Cost of sales incurred by the Mexico operations during 2013 increased $13.8 million, or 1.8%, from cost of sales incurred by the Mexico operations during 2012 despite the decrease in the number of weeks included in the respective fiscal years. The unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation contributed $24.3 million, or 3.2 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. Fertile egg purchases contributed $4.7 million, or 0.6% percentage points, and increased feed costs contributed $3.0 million, or 0.4 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. Fertile eggs purchased contributed $4.7 million, or 0.6% percentage points, and increased feed costs contributed $3.0 million, or 0.4 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. The impact of decreased sales volume, which resulted primarily from the lack of broiler eggs following the H7N3 influenza outbreak in Mexico, offset the increase in cost of sales by $10.0 million, or 1.3 percentage points. Finally, improved processing performance offset the increase in cost of sales by $8.8 million, or 1.1 percentage points. Other factors affecting Mexico cost of sales were immaterial.

Operating income. Operating income increased $408.5 million, or 163.2%, from $250.3 million generated for 2012 to $658.9 million generated for 2013. The following tables provide operating income information:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3">Components of operating income</td><td rowspan="3">2013</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2012</td><td colspan="2">Percent of Net Sales</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>$ 845,439</td><td>$ 409,607</td><td>94.0%</td><td>10.1%</td><td>5.4%</td></tr><tr><td>SG&amp;A expenses</td><td>180,915</td><td>3,874</td><td>2.2%</td><td>2.2%</td><td>2.2% (a)(b)</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges</td><td>5,661</td><td>(2,788)</td><td>(33.0)%</td><td>0.1%</td><td>0.1% (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>$ 658,863</td><td>$ 408,521</td><td>(163.2)%</td><td>7.8%</td><td>3.1%</td></tr></table>



<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Source of operating income</td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 551,975</td><td>$ 387,225</td><td>(235.0)%</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>107,768</td><td>22,176</td><td>(25.9)%</td></tr><tr><td>Elimination</td><td>(880)</td><td>(880)</td><td>(100.0)%</td></tr><tr><td>Total operating income</td><td>$ 658,863</td><td>$ 408,521</td><td>(163.2)%</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Change from 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Sources of SG&amp;A expenses</td><td>2013</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 160,228</td><td>$ 816</td><td>0.5% (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>20,687</td><td>3,058</td><td>17.3% (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Total SG&amp;A expense</td><td>$ 180,915</td><td>$ 3,874</td><td>2.2%</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Change from 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Sources of administrative restructuring charges</td><td>2013</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 5,661</td><td>$ (2,788)</td><td>(33.0)% (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Total administrative restructuring charges</td><td>$ 5,661</td><td>$ (2,788)</td><td>(33.0)%</td></tr></table>

(a) SG&A expenses incurred by the U.S. operations during 2013 increased $0.8 million, or 0.5%, from SG&A expenses incurred by the U.S. operations during 2012, despite a decrease in the number of weeks included in the respective fiscal years from 53 in 2012 to 52 in 2013, primarily because of a $15.0 million increase in payroll and related benefits expenses resulting primarily from higher incentive compensation and pension costs. This increase in SG&A expenses was partially offset by (i) an $8.2 million decrease in outside services and professional fees, (ii) a $3.5 million decrease in brokerage expenses and (iii) a $2.0 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses. Other factors affecting U.S. SG&A expenses were immaterial.

(b) SG&A expense incurred by the Mexico operations during 2013 increased $3.1 million, or 17.3%, from SG&A expense incurred by the Mexico operations during 2012, despite a decrease in the number of weeks included in the respective fiscal years, primarily because of a $2.1 million fine assessed by a commission of the Mexican government that we are currently appealing. The unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation also contributed $0.6 million, or 3.6 percentage points, to the increase in SG&A expenses. Other factors affecting Mexico SG&A expenses were immaterial.

(c) Administrative restructuring charges incurred during 2013 decreased $2.7 million, or 33.0%, from administrative restructuring charges incurred during 2012. During 2013, we incurred administrative restructuring charges related to noncash impairment charges of $3.7 million and live operations rationalization totaling $2.0 million. During 2012, we incurred administrative restructuring charges composed of (i) flock rationalization costs of $3.7 million related to our Dallas, Texas plant closure, (ii) impairment costs of $2.8 million and (iii) a loss resulting from the disposal of certain unused assets of $2.0 million.

Interest expense. Consolidated interest expense decreased 17.1% to $87.0 million in 2013 from $104.9 million in 2012 primarily because of decreased average borrowings of $990.5 million in 2013 compared to $1,242.2 million in 2012 partially offset by an increase in the weighted average interest rate to 7.10% in 2013 from 7.00% in 2012. As a percent of net sales, interest expense in 2013 and 2012 was 1.0% and 1.3%, respectively.

Income taxes. The Company's consolidated income tax expense in 2013 was $24.2 million, compared to income tax benefit of $21.0 million in 2012. The income tax expense in 2013 resulted primarily from an increase in income and a decrease in the valuation allowance. The net change in the total valuation allowance for 2013 was a decrease of $178.0 million, resulting primarily from the utilization of almost all of our domestic net operating losses. Due to this decrease, we expect a higher effective tax rate in the future. As of December 29, 2013, our valuation allowance is $10.4 million, of which $1.9 million relates to capital loss carry forwards and $8.5 million relates to Mexico net operating losses.



Net sales. Net sales for 2012 increased $585.7 million, or 7.8%, from 2011. The following table provides additional information regarding net sales:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3">Source of net sales</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 7,249,485</td><td>$ 470,758</td><td>6.9% (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>871,897</td><td>114,926</td><td>15.2% (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Total net sales</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 585,684</td><td>7.8%</td></tr></table>

(a) U.S. sales generated in 2012 increased $470.8 million, or 6.9%, from U.S. sales generated in 2011, primarily because of an increase in the net revenue per pound sold partially offset by a decrease in pounds sold. Increased net revenue per pound sold, which resulted primarily from an increase in market prices, contributed $499.6 million, or 7.4 percentage points, to the revenue increase. The decrease in pounds sold, which resulted in part from the fourth quarter 2011 disposals of our distribution and pork businesses, partially offset the increase in revenue per pound sold by $28.8 million, or 0.4 percentage points. The disposed distribution and pork businesses generated net sales of $332.4 million during 2011. Included in U.S. sales generated during 2012 and 2011 were sales to JBS USA, LLC totaling $206.7 million and $117.9 million, respectively.

(b) Mexico sales generated in 2012 increased $114.9 million, or 15.2%, from Mexico sales generated in 2011. An increase in unit sales volume, which resulted primarily from higher customer demand, contributed $60.0 million, or 7.9 percentage points, to the revenue increase. The increase in sales price, due to reduced supply resulting from production cuts, contributed $54.9 million, or 7.3 percentage points.

Gross profit. Gross profit increased by $577.4 million, or 407.9%, in 2012 from a gross loss of $141.5 million incurred in 2011 to a gross profit of $435.8 million generated in 2012. The following tables provide gross loss information:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3">Components of gross profit</td><td rowspan="3">2012</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td><td colspan="2">Percent of Net Sales</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 585,684</td><td>7.8%</td><td>100.0%</td><td>100.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>7,685,550</td><td>10,273</td><td>0.1%</td><td>94.6%</td><td>101.9% (a)(b)</td></tr><tr><td>Operational restructuring charges</td><td>—</td><td>(1,958)</td><td>(100.0)%</td><td>—%</td><td>—% (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>$ 435,832</td><td>$ 577,369</td><td>407.9%</td><td>5.4%</td><td>(1.9)%</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6">Change from 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Sources of gross profit</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td></td><td>$ 332,611</td><td>$ 492,811</td><td>307.6%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td></td><td>103,221</td><td>84,558</td><td>453.1%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total gross profit</td><td></td><td>$ 435,832</td><td>$ 577,369</td><td>407.9%</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Sources of cost of sales</td><td>2012</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 6,916,874</td><td>$ (20,096)</td><td>(0.3)% (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>768,676</td><td>30,369</td><td>4.1% (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Total cost of sales</td><td>$ 7,685,550</td><td>$ 10,273</td><td>0.1%</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="3">Sources of operational restructuring charges</td><td rowspan="3">2012</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (1,958)</td><td>(100.0)% (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Total operational restructuring charges</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (1,958)</td><td>(100.0)%</td></tr></table>

(a) Cost of sales incurred by the U.S. operations during 2012 decreased $20.1 million, or 0.3%, from cost of sales incurred by the U.S. operations during 2011. The disposal of the distribution and pork businesses contributed $295.2 million, or 4.3 percentage points, to the decrease in cost of sales. The closing of our Dallas, Texas plant contributed $62.0 million, or 0.9 percentage points, to the decrease in cost of sales. Decreased depreciation contributed $59.2 million, or 0.9 percentage points, to the decrease in cost of sales. The disposal of the commercial egg business contributed $12.0 million, or 0.2 percentage points, to the decrease in cost of sales. Decreased fleet expenses contributed $11.0 million, or 0.2 percentage points, to the decrease in cost of sales and packaging and ingredients costs. Feed ingredients costs contributed $365.0 million, or increased primarily because of higher feed ingredient costs, derivative net gain and packaging and ingredients costs. Feed ingredients costs contributed $365.0 million, or 5.3 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. Net gains recognized on both settled and outstanding derivative instruments contributed $54.0 million, or 0.8 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. Packaging and ingredients costs contributed $4.0 million, or 0.1 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. Other factors affecting cost of sales were immaterial.



(b) Cost of sales incurred by the Mexico operations during 2012 increased $30.4 million, or 4.1%, from cost of sales incurred by the Mexico operations during 2011. Increased feed costs contributed $108.7 million, or 14.7 percentage points and increased sales volume contributed $48.3 million, or 6.5 percentage points, to the increase in cost of sales. Decreased overhead costs and foreign currency translation partially offset the increase by $81.6 million and $44.9 million, respectively. Other factors affecting cost of sales were immaterial.

(c) Operational restructuring charges incurred by the U.S. operations during 2012 decreased $2.0 million, or 100.0%, from operational restructuring charges incurred by the U.S. operations during 2011. Operational restructuring charges for 2011 of $2.0 million represented impairment expense recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain assets located at our commercial egg operations in Texas to fair value.

Operating income. Operating income increased $623.9 million, or 167.0%, from an operating loss of $373.6 million incurred for 2011 to operating income of $250.3 million incurred for 2012. The following tables provide operating income information:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Components of operating income</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td><td colspan="2">Percent of Net Sales</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>$ 435,832</td><td>$ 577,369</td><td>407.9%</td><td>5.4%</td><td>(1.9)%</td></tr><tr><td>SG&amp;A expenses</td><td>177,041</td><td>(28,102)</td><td>(13.7)%</td><td>2.2%</td><td>2.7% (a)(b)</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges</td><td>8,449</td><td>(18,462)</td><td>(68.6)%</td><td>0.1%</td><td>0.4% (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>$ 250,342</td><td>$ 623,933</td><td>167.0%</td><td>3.1%</td><td>(5.0)%</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Source of operating income (loss)</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td></td><td>$ 164,750</td><td>$ 538,018</td><td>144.1%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td></td><td>85,592</td><td>85,915</td><td>26,599.1%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total operating income (loss)</td><td></td><td>$ 250,342</td><td>$ 623,933</td><td>167.0%</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Sources of SG&amp;A expenses</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 159,412</td><td>$ (26,745)</td><td>(14.4)% (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>17,629</td><td>(1,357)</td><td>(7.1)% (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Total SG&amp;A expense</td><td>$ 177,041</td><td>$ (28,102)</td><td>(13.7)%</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Sources of administrative restructuring charges</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">Change from 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Percent</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except percent data)</td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 8,449</td><td>$ (18,462)</td><td>(68.6)% (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Total administrative restructuring charges</td><td>$ 8,449</td><td>$ (18,462)</td><td>(68.6)%</td></tr></table>

(a) SG&A expenses incurred by the U.S. operations during 2012 decreased $26.7 million, or 14.4%, from SG&A expenses incurred by the U.S. operations during 2011 primarily because of (i) a decrease in outside services and professional fees of $7.1 million, (ii) a decrease in transactional tax expenses of $3.1 million, (iii) a decrease in brokerage expenses of $3.0 million, (iv) a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $2.4 million, (v) a decrease in marketing and development expenses of $2.2 million and (vi) a decrease in payroll and related benefit expenses $1.5 million. Other factors affecting SG&A expense were immaterial.

(b) SG&A expense incurred by the Mexico operations during 2012 decreased $1.4 million, or 7.1%, from SG&A expense incurred by the Mexico operations during 2011. Foreign exchange translation accounted for a decrease of $1.1 million of the decrease in SG&A expense. Other factors affecting SG&A expense were immaterial.

(c) Administrative restructuring charges incurred during 2012 decreased $18.5 million, or 68.6%, from administrative restructuring charges incurred during 2011. During 2012, we incurred administrative restructuring charges composed of (i) flock rationization costs of $3.7 million related to our Dallas, Texas plant closure, (ii) impairment costs of $2.8 million and (iii) a loss resulting from the disposal of certain unused assets of $2.0 million. During 2011, the Company incurred administrative restructuring charges composed of (i) impairment charges of $20.9 million, (ii) flock rationization costs of $5.2 million related to the closure of the Dallas, Texas plant and (iii) severance costs of $0.7 million.

Interest expense. Consolidated interest expense decreased 5.9% to $104.9 million in 2012 from $111.5 million in 2011 primarily because of decreased average borrowings of $1,242.2 million in 2012 compared to $1,483.0 million in 2011 partially offset by and increase in the weighted average interest rate increased to 7.0% in 2012 from 6.7% in 2011. As a percent of net sales, interest expense in 2012 and 2011, was 1.3% and 1.5%, respectively.



Income taxes. The Company's consolidated income tax benefit in 2012 was $21.0 million, compared to income tax expense of $8.6 million in 2011. The income tax benefit in 2012 resulted primarily from a decrease in valuation allowance and a decrease in reserves for unrecognized tax benefits. The income tax expense in 2011 resulted primarily from an increase in valuation allowance and an increase in reserves for unrecognized tax benefits. See “Note 11. Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

## Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents our available sources of liquidity as of December 29, 2013:

<table><tr><td>Source of Liquidity</td><td>Facility Amount</td><td>Amount Outstanding (In millions)</td><td>Available</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 508.2</td></tr><tr><td>Investments in available-for-sale securities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>96.9</td></tr><tr><td>Debt facilities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U.S. Credit Facility</td><td>695.4</td><td>—</td><td>665.8 (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico Credit Facility</td><td>42.7</td><td>—</td><td>42.7 (b)</td></tr></table>

(a) Actual borrowings by the Company under the U.S. Credit Facility (as defined below) are subject to a borrowing base, which is a formula based on certain eligible inventory and eligible receivables. The borrowing base in effect on December 29, 2013 was $695.4 million. Availability under the U.S. Credit Facility is also reduced by the Company's outstanding standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit outstanding at December 29, 2013 totaled $29.6 million.

(b) Under the Mexico Credit Facility (as defined below), if (i) any default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or (ii) the quotation of the borrowing base divided by the outstanding loans and letters of credit (the "Collateral Coverage Ratio") under the Mexico Credit Facility is less than 1.25 to 1.00, the loans and letters of credit under the Mexico Credit Facility will be subject to, and cannot exceed, a borrowing base. The borrowing base is a formula based on accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid assets, net cash under the control of the administrative agent and up to 150.0 million Mexican pesos of fixed assets of the loan parties. The borrowing base formula will be reduced by trade payables of the loan parties. If the Collateral Coverage Ratio falls below 1.25 to 1.00, the borrowing base requirement would terminate upon the earlier of (i) the Collateral Coverage Ratio exceeding 1.25 to 1.00 as of the latest measurement period for 60 consecutive days or (ii) the borrowing availability under the Mexico Credit Facility being equal to or greater than the greater of 20% of the revolving commitments under the Mexico Credit Facility and 100.0 million Mexican pesos for a period of 60 consecutive days.

## Debt Obligations

Senior and Subordinated Notes. At December 29, 2013, we had an aggregate principal balance of $500.0 million of 7 7½% senior notes due 2018 (the "2018 Notes") outstanding that are registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The 2018 Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are guaranteed by one of our subsidiaries. Interest is payable on December 15 and June 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The indenture governing the 2018 Notes contains various covenants that may adversely affect our ability, among other things, to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain restricted payments, consummate certain asset sales, enter into certain transactions with JBS USA and our other affiliates, merge, consolidate and/or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. Additionally, we have an aggregate principal balance of $3.6 million of 7 5½% senior unsecured notes and 8 3½% senior subordinated unsecured notes outstanding at December 29, 2013.

JBS Subordinated Loan Agreement. On June 23, 2011, we entered into a Subordinated Loan Agreement with JBS USA (the "Subordinated Loan Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Subordinated Loan Agreement, we agreed to reimburse JBS USA up to $56.5 million for draws upon any letters of credit issued for JBS USA's account that support certain obligations of our company or its subsidiaries. JBS USA agreed to arrange for letters of credit to be issued on its account in the amount of $56.5 million to an insurance company serving us in order to allow that insurance company to return cash it held as collateral against potential workers compensation, auto and general liability claims. In return for providing this letter of credit, we agreed to reimburse JBS USA for the letter of credit cost we would otherwise incur under our U.S. Credit Facility (as defined below). The total amount we paid in 2013, 2012 and 2011 to reimburse JBS USA, was $2.2 million, $2.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of December 29, 2013, we have accrued an obligation of $0.1 million to reimburse JBS USA for letter of credit costs incurred on our behalf. There remains no other commitment to make advances by JBS USA under the Subordinated Loan Agreement.



U.S. Credit Facility. We and certain of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the "U.S. Credit Facility") with CoBank, ACB, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and other lenders party thereto, which was amended and restated on August 7, 2013. The U.S. Credit Facility currently provides for a $700.0 million revolving credit facility, a Term B facility of approximately $410.1 million and a delayed draw term loan commitment of up to $400 million (the "Delayed Draw Term Loans"). We can draw upon the Delayed Draw Term Loan commitment, in one or more advances, between May 1, 2014 and December 28, 2014. The U.S. Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature that allows us, at any time, to increase the aggregate revolving loan commitment by up to an additional $250.0 million and to increase the aggregate Delayed Draw Term Loan commitment by up to an additional $500.0 million, in each case subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including obtaining the lenders' agreement to participate in the increase and an aggregate limit on all commitments under the U.S. Credit Facility of $1.85 billion. The U.S. Credit Facility also provides for a $100 million sub-limit for swingline loans and a $200 million sub-limit for letters of credit. The Term B Loans mature on December 28, 2014 with all principal and unpaid interest due at maturity. The revolving loan commitment under the U.S. Credit Facility matures on August 7, 2018. Any Delayed Draw Term Loans would be payable in quarterly installments beginning in fiscal year 2015 equal to 1.875% of the principal outstanding as of December 28, 2014, with all remaining principal and interest due at maturity on August 7, 2018.

On December 28, 2009, we paid loan costs totaling $50.0 million related to the U.S. Credit Facility that we recognized as an asset on our balance sheet. On August 7, 2013, we paid loan costs totaling $5.0 million related to the amendment and restatement to the U.S. Credit Facility that we recognized as an asset on our balance sheet. We amortize these capitalized costs to interest expense over the life of the U.S. Credit Facility.

Subsequent to the end of each fiscal year, a portion of our cash flow must be used to repay outstanding principal amounts under the Term B loans. With respect to 2013, we paid $204.9 million of our cash flow toward the outstanding principal under the Term B-1 loans on December 30, 2013, and expect to pay approximately $205.2 million of our cash flow toward the outstanding principal under the Term B-2 loans on April 28, 2014. Following the April 28, 2014 payment, we will have no outstanding principal under the Term B loans. The U.S. Credit Facility also requires us to use the proceeds we receive from certain asset sales and specified debt or equity issuances and upon the occurrence of other events to repay outstanding borrowings under the U.S. Credit Facility. On December 29, 2013, a principal amount of $410.1 million under the Term B loans commitment was outstanding.

Actual borrowings by us under the revolving credit commitment component of the U.S. Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base, which is a formula based on certain eligible inventory, eligible receivables and restricted cash under the control of CoBank, ACB. As of December 29, 2013, the applicable borrowing base was $695.4 million, the amount available for borrowing under the revolving loan commitment was $665.8 million. We had letters of credit of $29.6 million and no outstanding borrowings under the revolving loan commitment as of December 29, 2013.

The U.S. Credit Facility contains financial covenants and various other covenants that may adversely affect our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain restricted payments, consummate certain assets sales, enter into certain transactions with JBS USA and our other affiliates, merge, consolidate and/or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. The U.S. Credit Facility requires us to comply with a minimum level of tangible net worth covenant. We are currently in compliance with this financial covenant. All other financial covenants were eliminated in connection with the August 7, 2013 amendment and restatement to the U.S. Credit Facility. The U.S. Credit Facility also provides that we may not incur capital expenditures in excess of $350.0 million in any fiscal year.

All obligations under the U.S. Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority lien on (i) the accounts receivable and inventories our company and our non-Mexico subsidiaries, (ii) 65% of the equity interests in our direct foreign subsidiaries and 100% of the equity interests in our other subsidiaries, (iii) substantially all of the personal property and intangibles of the borrowers and guarantors under the U.S. Credit Facility and (iv) substantially all of the real estate and fixed assets of our company and the guarantor subsidiaries under the U.S. Credit Facility.

Mexico Credit Facility. On October 19, 2011, Avícola Pilgrim's Pride de México, S.A. de C.V. ("Avícola"), Pilgrim's Pride S. de R.L. de C.V. and certain other Mexican subsidiaries entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the "Mexico Credit Facility") with ING Bank (México), S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, ING Grupo Financiero, as lender and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The Mexico Credit Facility has a final maturity date of September 25, 2014. The Mexico Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of our Mexico subsidiaries. As of December 29, 2013, the U.S. dollar-equivalent of the loan commitment under the Mexico Credit Facility was $42.7 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Mexico Credit Facility at December 29, 2013.

Avícola may pay dividends or make other restricted payments to us in an amount not to exceed in the aggregate $250.0 million Mexican pesos during the term of the Mexico Credit Facility if certain conditions are satisfied, including a condition that availability is at least 100% of the revolving loan commitment under the Mexico Credit Facility, less any letter of credit liability under the Mexico Credit Facility. However, we deem our earnings from Mexico as of December 29, 2013 to be permanently reinvested. As such, U.S. deferred income taxes have not been provided on these earnings. If such earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested, certain deferred foreign and U.S. income taxes would be provided.



## Collateral

Substantially all of our domestic inventories and domestic fixed assets are pledged as collateral to secure the obligations under the U.S. Credit Facility. The Mexico Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company's Mexico subsidiaries.

## Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We maintain operating leases for various types of equipment, some of which contain residual value guarantees for the market value of assets at the end of the term of the lease. The terms of the lease maturities range from one to ten years. We estimate the maximum potential amount of the residual value guarantees is approximately $2.6 million; however, the actual amount would be offset by any recoverable amount based on the fair market value of the underlying leased assets. No liability has been recorded related to this contingency as the likelihood of payments under these guarantees is not considered to be probable, and the fair value of the guarantees is immaterial. We historically have not experienced significant payments under similar residual guarantees.

We are a party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. Among other considerations, we have not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities as, based upon the likelihood of payment, the fair value of such indemnities would not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

## Capital Expenditures

We anticipate spending between $110.0 million and $150.0 million on the acquisition of property, plant and equipment in 2014. Capital expenditures will primarily be incurred to improve efficiencies and reduce costs. We expect to fund these capital expenditures with cash flow from operations and proceeds from the revolving lines of credit under our various debt facilities.

## Indefinite Reinvestment of Mexico Subsidiaries' Undistributed Earnings

We have determined that the undistributed earnings of our Mexico subsidiaries will be indefinitely reinvested and not distributed to the U.S. The undistributed earnings of our Mexico subsidiaries totaled $286.3 million at December 29, 2013.

## Contractual Obligations

In addition to our debt commitments at December 29, 2013, we had other commitments and contractual obligations that obligate us to make specified payments in the future. The following table summarizes the total amounts due as of December 29, 2013, under all debt agreements, commitments and other contractual obligations. The table indicates the years in which payments are due under the contractual obligations.

<table><tr><td rowspan="3">Contractual Obligations(a)</td><td colspan="6">Payments Due By Period</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Total</td><td rowspan="2">2014</td><td colspan="2">Years</td><td>Years</td><td>After</td></tr><tr><td>2015-2016</td><td>2017-2018</td><td>2018</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="6">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt(b)</td><td>$ 913,732</td><td>$ 410,099</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 503,517</td><td>$ —</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest(c)</td><td>230,076</td><td>69,040</td><td>80,770</td><td>80,266</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Capital leases</td><td>950</td><td>194</td><td>316</td><td>245</td><td>195</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating leases</td><td>21,139</td><td>7,621</td><td>10,530</td><td>2,970</td><td>18</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative liabilities</td><td>1,728</td><td>1,728</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Purchase obligations(d)</td><td>160,869</td><td>150,632</td><td>9,455</td><td>782</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 1,328,494</td><td>$ 639,314</td><td>$ 101,187</td><td>$ 587,780</td><td>$ 213</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) The total amount of PPC’s unrecognized tax benefits at December 29, 2013 was $17.1 million. We did not include this amount in the contractual obligations table above as reasonable estimates cannot be made at this time of the amounts or timing of future cash outflows. The table above does not include estimated funding of our unfunded pension and other postretirement benefits obligations totaling approximately $63.2 million at December 29, 2013 as discussed in “Note 12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b) Long-term debt includes an unaccreted discount of $2.2 million and excludes $29.6 million in letters of credit outstanding related to normal business transactions. Pursuant to the U.S. Credit Facility, subsequent to the end of each fiscal year, a portion of our cash flow must be used to repay outstanding principal amounts under the Term B loans. With respect to 2013, we paid $204.9 million of our cash flow toward the outstanding principal under the Term B-1 loans on December 30, 2013, and expect to pay approximately $205.2 million of our cash flow toward the outstanding principal under the Term B-2 loans on April 28, 2014. After giving effect to these payments, no Term B loans will remain outstanding under the U.S. Credit Facility.

(c) Interest expense in the table above assumes the continuation of interest rates and outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities as of December 29, 2013.

(d) Includes agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.



## Fiscal Year 2013

Cash provided by operating activities was $878.5 million for 2013 and cash provided by operating activities was $199.6 million for 2012. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities was primarily from net income of $549.7 million for 2013 as compared to net income of $174.0 million for 2012 and changes in working capital (excluding the impacts as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates).

Our net working capital position, which we define as current assets less current liabilities, increased $33.0 million to a surplus of $845.6 million and a current ratio of 1.78 at December 29, 2013 compared to a surplus of $812.5 million and a current ratio of 2.11 at December 30, 2012. The increase in working capital was caused by the generation of cash from operations.

Trade accounts and other receivables, including accounts receivable from JBS USA, decreased $7.3 million, or 1.9%, to $379.1 million at December 29, 2013 from $386.4 million at December 30, 2012. The change in trade accounts and other receivables resulted primarily from improved collections.

Inventories decreased $141.5 million, or 14.9%, to $808.8 million at December 29, 2013 from $950.3 million at December 30, 2012. The change in inventories was primarily due to decreased costs for feed grains and their impact on the value of our live chicken inventories.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased $5.8 million, or 10.4%, to $61.8 million at December 29, 2013 from $56.0 million at December 30, 2012. This change resulted primarily from a $5.2 million increase in open derivative positions and margin cash on deposit with our derivatives traders.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including accounts payable to JBS USA, increased $48.3 million, or 7.9%, to $657.6 million at December 29, 2013 from $609.3 million at December 30, 2012. This change resulted primarily from the timing of payments disbursed to vendors around December 29, 2013.

Cash used in investing activities was $181.8 million and $60.4 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. We incurred capital expenditures of $116.2 million and $90.3 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively. In both 2013 and 2012, capital expenditures were primarily incurred for the routine replacement of equipment and to improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Cash was used to purchase investment securities totaling $96.9 million and $0.2 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Capital expenditures for 2013 could not exceed $350 million under the terms of the U.S. Credit Facility. Cash proceeds generated from property disposals in 2013 and 2012 totaled $31.3 million and $29.4 million, respectively. Cash proceeds generated in 2012 from the sale or maturity of investment securities totaled $0.7 million.

Cash used in financing activities was $250.2 million in 2013. Cash provided by financing activities was $111.0 million in 2012. Cash proceeds in 2013 and 2012 from long-term debt were $505.6 million and $851.4 million, respectively. Cash was used to repay long-term debt totaling $758.6 million and $1,110.7 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Cash proceeds in 2013 resulting from a tax benefit related to share-based compensation totaled $7.7 million. Cash was used to pay capitalized loan costs totaling $5.0 million in 2013. Cash proceeds generated in 2012 from the sale of common stock totaled $198.3 million. Cash was used in 2012 to repay a $50.0 million note payable issued to JBS USA under the Subordinated Loan Agreement.

## Fiscal Year 2012

Cash provided by operating activities was $199.6 million for 2012 and cash used in operating activities was $129.0 million for 2011. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities was primarily from net income of $174.0 million for 2012 as compared to a net loss of $495.7 million for 2011 and changes in working capital (excluding the impacts as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates).

Our net working capital position, which we define as current assets less current liabilities, increased $65.5 million to a surplus of $812.5 million and a current ratio of 2.11 at December 30, 2012 compared to a surplus of $747.0 million and a current ratio of 2.04 at December 25, 2011. The increase in working capital was caused by the generation of cash from operations.



Trade accounts and other receivables, including accounts receivable from JBS USA, increased $16.0 million, or 4.3%, to $379.1 million at December 30, 2012 from $370.4 million at December 25, 2011. The change in trade accounts and other receivables resulted primarily from increased sales prices.

Inventories increased $71.2 million, or 8.1%, to $950.3 million at December 30, 2012 from $879.1 million at December 25, 2011. The change in inventories was primarily due to increased costs for live chicken products and feed, eggs and other inventory items.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased $3.7 million, or 7.1%, to $56.0 million at December 30, 2012 from $52.3 million at December 25, 2011. This change resulted primarily from a $9.8 million increase in value-added tax receivables and an increase of $12.0 million in prepaid insurance. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $14.2 million in prepaid grain purchases and a decrease of $4.3 million in open derivative positions.

Accounts payable, including accounts payable to JBS USA, decreased $14.7 million, or 4.3%, to $325.8 million at December 30, 2012 from $340.5 million at December 25, 2011. This change resulted from the timing of payments disbursed to vendors at December 25, 2011.

Accrued expenses increased $1.7 million, or 0.6%, to $283.5 million at December 30, 2012 from $281.8 million at December 25, 2011. This change resulted primarily from a $5.3 million increase in compensation, benefits and other employee-related accruals and a $4.5 million increase in accrued property taxes. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $3.9 million in market development fund accruals, a $2.3 million decrease in accrued interest, a $1.1 million decrease in brokerage accrued expenses and a $1.0 million decrease in outstanding derivative liabilities.

Cash used in investing activities was $60.4 million and $58.2 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. We incurred capital expenditures of $90.3 million and $136.0 million for 2012 and 2011, respectively. In 2012, capital expenditures were primarily incurred for the routine replacement of equipment and to improve efficiencies and reduce costs. In 2011, capital expenditures were primarily incurred for the reopening of the Douglas, Georgia facility and for the routine replacement of equipment and to improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Capital expenditures for 2012 could not exceed $175 million under the terms of the U.S. Credit Facility. Cash was used to purchase investment securities totaling $0.2 million and $4.6 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Cash proceeds in 2012 and 2011 from the sale or maturity of investment securities were $0.7 million and $15.9 million, respectively. Cash proceeds from property disposals in 2012 and 2011 were $29.4 million and $29.0 million, respectively. Cash proceeds from business dispositions in 2011 totaled $37.5 million.

Cash used in financing activities was $111.0 million in 2012. Cash provided by financing activities was $126.9 million in 2011. Cash was used in 2012 to repay a $50.0 million note payable issued to JBS USA under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. Cash proceeds of $50.0 million were received in 2011 from JBS USA in exchange for a note payable issued under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. Cash proceeds in 2012 and 2011 from long-term debt were $851.4 million and $965.7 million, respectively. Cash was used to repay long-term debt totaling $1,110.7 million and $881.8 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Cash proceeds in 2012 from the sale of common stock were $198.3 million. Cash was used to pay capitalized loan costs totaling $4.4 million in 2011. Cash used to purchase the remaining interest in a subsidiary we did not already own totaled $2.5 million in 2011. Cash was used for other financing activities totaling $0.1 million in 2011.

## Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

General. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, customer programs and incentives, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, income taxes and product recall accounting. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following circumstances are satisfied: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) price is fixed or determinable, (iii) collectability is reasonably assured and (iv) delivery has occurred. Delivery occurs in the period in which the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership of the products specified in the customer's purchase order or sales agreement. Revenue is recorded net of estimated incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. Revisions to these estimates are charged back to net sales in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.



Inventory. Live chicken inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and breeder hens at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or market. The costs associated with breeder hens are accumulated up to the production stage and amortized over their productive lives using the unit-of-production method. Finished poultry products, feed, eggs and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost (average) or market. We record valuations and adjustments for our inventory and for estimated obsolescence at or equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon known conditions affecting inventory obsolescence, including significantly aged products, discontinued product lines, or damaged or obsolete products. We allocate meat costs between our various finished chicken products based on a by-product costing technique that reduces the cost of the whole bird by estimated yields and amounts to be recovered for certain byproduct parts. This primarily includes leg quarters, wings, tenders and offal, which are carried in inventory at the estimated recovery amounts, with the remaining amount being reflected as our breast meat cost. Generally, the Company performs an evaluation of whether any lower of cost or market adjustments are required at the country level based on a number of factors, including: (i) pools of related inventory, (ii) product continuation or discontinuation, (iii) estimated market selling prices and (iv) expected distribution channels. If actual market conditions or other factors are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory adjustments may be required.

Property, Plant and Equipment. The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets held for use when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. The impairment charge is determined based upon the amount by which the net book value of the assets exceeds their fair market value. In making these determinations, the Company utilizes certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, remaining length of service and estimated salvage values, (ii) estimated fair market value of the assets, and (iii) determinations with respect to the lowest level of cash flows relevant to the respective impairment test, generally groupings of related operational facilities. Given the interdependency of the Company’s individual facilities during the production process, which operate as a vertically integrated network, and the fact that the Company does not price the transfers of inventory between its vertically integrated facilities at market prices, it evaluates impairment of assets held for use at the country level (i.e., the U.S. and Mexico) within each segment. Management believes this is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows for its assets that are held for use in production activities. At the present time, the Company’s forecasts indicate that it can recover the carrying value of its assets held for use based on the projected undiscounted cash flows of the operations.

The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets held for sale when the carrying amount of those assets exceeds their fair value less appropriate selling costs. Fair value is based on amounts documented in sales contracts or letters of intent accepted by the Company, amounts included in counteroffers initiated by the Company, or, in the absence of current contract negotiations, amounts determined using a sales comparison approach for real property and amounts determined using a cost approach for personal property. Under the sales comparison approach, sales and asking prices of reasonably comparable properties are considered to develop a range of unit prices within which the current real estate market is operating. Under the cost approach, a current cost to replace the asset new is calculated and then the estimated replacement cost is reduced to reflect the applicable decline in value resulting from physical deterioration, functional obsolescence and economic obsolescence. Appropriate selling costs includes reasonable broker's commissions, costs to produce title documents, filing fees, legal expenses and the like. We estimate appropriate closing costs as 4% to 6% of asset fair value. This range of rates is considered reasonable for our assets held for sale based on historical experience. The Company recognized impairment charges related to assets held for sale of $4.0 million and $2.8 million during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Litigation and Contingent Liabilities. The Company is subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to employment, environmental, product, and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes, as well as potential ranges of probable losses, to these matters. The Company estimates the amount of reserves required for these contingencies when losses are determined to be probable and after considerable analysis of each individual issue. The Company expenses legal costs related to such loss contingencies as they are incurred. With respect to our environmental remediation obligations, the accrual for environmental remediation liabilities is measured on an undiscounted basis. These reserves may change in the future due to changes in the Company’s assumptions, the effectiveness of strategies, or other factors beyond the Company’s control.

Accrued Self Insurance. Insurance expense for casualty claims and employee-related health care benefits are estimated using historical and current experience and actuarial estimates. Stop-loss coverage is maintained with third-party insurers to limit the Company’s total exposure. Certain categories of claim liabilities are actuarially determined. The assumption used to arrive at periodic expenses is reviewed regularly by management. However, actual expenses could differ from these estimates and could result in adjustments to be recognized.



Income Taxes. Starting in 2011, the Company follows the provisions of ASC 740-10-30-27 in the Expenses-Income Taxes topic with regards to members of a group that file a consolidated tax return but issue separate financial statements. The Company files its own U.S. federal tax return, but is included in certain state consolidated returns with JBS USA. The income tax expense of the Company is computed using the separate return method. The provision for income taxes has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities, net operating losses and tax credit carry forwards. The amount of deferred tax on these temporary differences is determined using the tax rates expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, as applicable, based on the tax rates and laws in the respective tax jurisdiction enacted as of the balance sheet date. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to income tax positions as a part of the income tax provision.

Realizability of Deferred Tax Assets. The Company reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, potential for carry back of tax losses, projected future taxable income, applicable tax strategies, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances have been established primarily for net operating loss carry forwards. See “Note 11. Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Indefinite Reinvestment in Foreign Subsidiaries. The Company deems its earnings from Mexico as of December 29, 2013 to be permanently reinvested. As such, U.S. deferred income taxes have not been provided on these earnings. If such earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested, certain deferred foreign and U.S. income taxes would be provided. For activity after 2008, the Company did not permanently reinvest its earnings in Puerto Rico. Therefore, net earnings generated in Puerto Rico have U.S. taxes provided as if the earnings were distributed.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The Company follows the provisions under ASC 740-10-25 that provides a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition of a tax benefit taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Tax benefits are recognized only when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the benefits will be sustained on examination. Tax benefits that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured using a probability weighting of the largest amount of tax benefit that has greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a particular tax benefit is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances evaluated in light of all available evidence as of the balance sheet date. See “Note 11. Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits. The Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations are dependent on the various actuarial assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions relate to discount rates, salary growth, long-term return on plan assets and other factors. The Company bases the discount rate assumptions on current investment yields on high-quality corporate long-term bonds. The salary growth assumptions reflect our long-term actual experience and future or near-term outlook. Long-term return on plan assets is determined based on historical portfolio results and management’s expectation of the future economic environment. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and, if in excess of the lesser of 10% of the projected benefit obligation or the fair market value of plan assets, amortized over either (i) the estimated average future service period of active plan participants if the plan is active or (ii) the estimated average future life expectancy of all plan participants if the plan is frozen.



## Market Risk-Sensitive Instruments and Positions

The risk inherent in our market risk-sensitive instruments and positions is primarily the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the price of feed ingredients, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and the credit quality of available-for-sale securities as discussed below. The sensitivity analyses presented do not consider the effects that such adverse changes may have on overall economic activity, nor do they consider additional actions our management may take to mitigate our exposure to such changes. Actual results may differ.

Commodity Prices. We purchase certain commodities, primarily corn, soybean meal and sorghum, for use as ingredients in the feed we either sell commercially or consume in our live operations. As a result, our earnings are affected by changes in the price and availability of such feed ingredients. In the past, we have from time to time attempted to minimize our exposure to the changing price and availability of such feed ingredients using various techniques, including, but not limited to, (i) executing purchase agreements with suppliers for future physical delivery of feed ingredients at established prices and (ii) purchasing or selling derivative financial instruments such as futures and options.

Market risk is estimated as a hypothetical 10% increase in the weighted-average cost of our primary feed ingredients as of December 29, 2013. However, fluctuations greater than 10% could occur. Based on our feed consumption during 2013, such an increase would have resulted in an increase to cost of sales of approximately $336.5 million, excluding the impact of any feed ingredients derivative financial instruments in that period. A 10% change in ending feed ingredients inventories at December 29, 2013 would be $10.3 million, excluding any potential impact on the production costs of our chicken inventories.

We purchase commodity derivative financial instruments, specifically exchange-traded futures and options, in an attempt to mitigate price risk related to its anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for the next 12 months. A 10% increase in corn, soybean meal, and natural gas prices on December 29, 2013 would have resulted in an increase of approximately $0.8 million in the fair value of our net commodity derivative asset position as of that date.

Interest Rates. Our earnings are also affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on our variable-rate debt instruments. We had variable-rate debt instruments representing approximately 22.5% of our total debt at December 29, 2013. Holding other variables constant, including levels of indebtedness, an increase in interest rates of 25 basis points would have increased our interest expense by $0.5 million for 2013. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our variable-rate debt at December 29, 2013.

Market risk for fixed-rate debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value resulting from a hypothetical decrease in interest rates of 10%. Using a discounted cash flow analysis, a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates would have increased the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately $4.0 million as of December 29, 2013.

Foreign Currency. Our earnings are affected by foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to the Mexican peso net monetary position of our Mexican subsidiaries. We manage this exposure primarily by attempting to minimize our Mexican peso net monetary position. We are also exposed to the effect of potential exchange rate fluctuations to the extent that amounts are repatriated from Mexico to the U.S. However, we currently anticipate that the future cash flows of our Mexican subsidiaries will be reinvested in our Mexican operations. In addition, the Mexican peso exchange rate can directly and indirectly impact our financial condition and results of operations in several ways, including potential economic recession in Mexico because of devaluation of their currency. The impact on our financial position and results of operations resulting from a hypothetical change in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso cannot be reasonably estimated. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses, representing the change in the U.S. dollar value of the net monetary assets of our Mexican subsidiaries denominated in Mexican pesos, was a loss of $4.4 million in 2013, a gain of $4.9 million in 2012 and a loss of $12.6 million in 2011. The average exchange rates for 2013, 2012 and 2011 were 12.75 Mexican pesos to 1 U.S. dollar, 13.16 Mexican pesos to 1 U.S. dollar and 12.39 Mexican pesos to 1 U.S. dollar, respectively. No assurance can be given as to how future movements in the Mexican peso could affect our future financial condition or results of operations.

Our Mexico operations sometimes purchase foreign currency derivative financial instruments, specifically exchange-traded forward contracts, in an attempt to mitigate foreign currency transaction exposure on U.S. dollar-denominated purchases. As of December 29, 2013, our Mexico operations held no foreign currency derivative instruments.

Quality of Investments. Certain retirement plans that we sponsor invest in a variety of financial instruments. We have analyzed our portfolios of investments and, to the best of our knowledge, none of our investments, including money market funds units, commercial paper and municipal securities, have been downgraded, and neither we nor any fund in which we participate hold significant amounts of structured investment vehicles, auction rate securities, collateralized debt obligations, credit derivatives, hedge funds investments, fund of funds investments or perpetual preferred securities. Certain postretirement funds in which we participate hold significant amounts of mortgage-backed securities. However, none of the mortgages collateralizing these securities are considered subprime.



Impact of Inflation. Due to low to moderate inflation in the U.S. and Mexico and our rapid inventory turnover rate, the results of operations have not been significantly affected by inflation during the past three-year period.

## Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

## Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (the "Company") as of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2013 and the fifty-three weeks ended December 30, 2012. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited financial statement schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, as of and for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2013 and the fifty-three weeks ended December 30, 2012. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation as of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2013 and the fifty-three weeks ended December 30, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited the retrospective adjustments applied to earnings per share in the 2011 consolidated financial statements as described in “Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity” under the section “Rights Offering.” In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2011 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2011 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 21, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

## Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in “Note 13. Stockholders' Equity,” the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 25, 2011 of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (the "Company") (the 2011 consolidated financial statements before the effects of the adjustments discussed in “Note 13. Stockholders' Equity” are not presented herein). Our audit also includes the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in “Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity,” referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 25, 2011 of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in “Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity” and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by KPMG LLP.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 17, 2012



## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">December 29, 2013</td><td colspan="2">December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except share and par value data)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$     508,206</td><td>$     68,180</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Investment in available-for-sale securities</td><td>96,902</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade accounts and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>376,678</td><td>384,930</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Account receivable from JBS USA, LLC</td><td>2,388</td><td>1,514</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td>808,832</td><td>950,296</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes receivable</td><td>64,868</td><td>54,719</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current deferred tax assets</td><td>2,227</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets</td><td>61,848</td><td>56,047</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Assets held for sale</td><td>7,033</td><td>27,042</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total current assets</td><td>1,928,982</td><td>1,542,728</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax assets</td><td>18,921</td><td>97,431</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other long-lived assets</td><td>40,163</td><td>45,523</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Identified intangible assets, net</td><td>32,525</td><td>38,266</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, net</td><td>1,151,811</td><td>1,189,921</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$     3,172,402</td><td>$     2,913,869</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>$     410,234</td><td>$     15,886</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable</td><td>370,360</td><td>312,365</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable to JBS USA, LLC</td><td>3,934</td><td>13,436</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses</td><td>283,355</td><td>283,540</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes payable</td><td>—</td><td>468</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current deferred tax liabilities</td><td>15,515</td><td>104,482</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total current liabilities</td><td>1,083,398</td><td>730,177</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt, less current maturities</td><td>501,999</td><td>1,148,870</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax liabilities</td><td>13,944</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other long-term liabilities</td><td>80,459</td><td>125,825</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>1,679,800</td><td>2,004,872</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Commitments and contingencies</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized; 259,029,033 and 258,999,033 shares issued and outstanding at year-end 2013 and 2012, respectively</td><td>2,590</td><td>2,590</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Additional paid-in capital</td><td>1,653,119</td><td>1,642,003</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated deficit</td><td>(120,156)</td><td>(669,711)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated other comprehensive loss</td><td>(45,735)</td><td>(68,511)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>1,489,818</td><td>906,371</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Noncontrolling interest</td><td>2,784</td><td>2,626</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>1,492,602</td><td>908,997</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities and stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>$     3,172,402</td><td>$     2,913,869</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td>Fifty-Two Weeks</td><td>Fifty-Three Weeks</td><td>Fifty-Two Weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Ended</td><td>Ended</td><td>Ended</td></tr><tr><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td><td>December 25, 2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands, except per share data)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 7,535,698</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>7,565,709</td><td>7,685,550</td><td>7,675,277</td></tr><tr><td>Operational restructuring charges</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,958</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit (loss)</td><td>845,439</td><td>435,832</td><td>(141,537)</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td><td>180,915</td><td>177,041</td><td>205,143</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges</td><td>5,661</td><td>8,449</td><td>26,911</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income (loss)</td><td>658,863</td><td>250,342</td><td>(373,591)</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense, net of capitalized interest</td><td>87,006</td><td>104,926</td><td>111,532</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>(2,125)</td><td>(1,397)</td><td>(1,465)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)</td><td>4,415</td><td>(4,810)</td><td>12,601</td></tr><tr><td>Miscellaneous, net</td><td>(4,373)</td><td>(1,439)</td><td>(9,133)</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) before income taxes</td><td>573,940</td><td>153,062</td><td>(487,126)</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>24,227</td><td>(20,980)</td><td>8,564</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>549,713</td><td>174,042</td><td>(495,690)</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>158</td><td>(192)</td><td>1,082</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Corporation</td><td>$ 549,555</td><td>$ 174,234</td><td>$ (496,772)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic</td><td>258,826</td><td>250,101</td><td>224,996</td></tr><tr><td>Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents</td><td>415</td><td>115</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted</td><td>259,241</td><td>250,216</td><td>224,996</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income per share of common stock outstanding:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic</td><td>$ 2.12</td><td>$ 0.70</td><td>$ (2.21)</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted</td><td>$ 2.12</td><td>$ 0.70</td><td>$ (2.21)</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>Fifty-Two Weeks Ended</td><td>Fifty-Three Weeks Ended</td><td>Fifty-Two Weeks Ended</td></tr><tr><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td><td>December 25, 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>$ 549,713</td><td>174,042</td><td>(495,690)</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax, net of tax of $0 in each of the three periods</td><td>62</td><td>(12)</td><td>(1,160)</td></tr><tr><td>Gains (losses) associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax of $13,774, $0 and $0, respectively</td><td>22,714</td><td>(22,429)</td><td>(21,273)</td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>22,776</td><td>(22,441)</td><td>(22,433)</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>572,489</td><td>151,601</td><td>(518,123)</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>158</td><td>(192)</td><td>1,082</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation</td><td>$ 572,331</td><td>$ 151,793</td><td>$ (519,205)</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="8">Common Stock</td></tr><tr><td>Shares</td><td>Amount</td><td>Additional Paid-in Capital</td><td>Accumulated Deficit</td><td>Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)</td><td>Noncontrolling Interests</td><td>Total</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at December 26, 2010</td><td>214,282</td><td>$ 2,143</td><td>$ 1,442,810</td><td>$ (348,653)</td><td>$ (23,637)</td><td>$ 5,933</td><td>$ 1,078,596</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(496,772)</td><td></td><td>1,082</td><td>(495,690)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(1,160)</td><td></td><td>(1,160)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Losses associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax of $0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(21,273)</td><td></td><td>(21,273)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive loss</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(22,433)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive loss</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(518,123)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Share-based compensation plans requisite service period recognition</td><td></td><td></td><td>567</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>567</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other activity</td><td></td><td></td><td>107</td><td>1,480</td><td></td><td>(4,197)</td><td>(2,610)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at December 25, 2011</td><td>214,282</td><td>$ 2,143</td><td>1,443,484</td><td>(843,945)</td><td>(46,070)</td><td>2,818</td><td>558,430</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>174,234</td><td></td><td>(192)</td><td>174,042</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(12)</td><td></td><td>(12)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Losses associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax of $0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(22,429)</td><td></td><td>(22,429)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive loss</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(22,441)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>151,601</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock issued</td><td>44,444</td><td>444</td><td>197,837</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>198,281</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Share-based compensation plans:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock issued under compensation plans</td><td>273</td><td>3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>3</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Requisite service period recognition</td><td></td><td></td><td>682</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>682</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at December 30, 2012</td><td>258,999</td><td>2,590</td><td>1,642,003</td><td>(669,711)</td><td>(68,511)</td><td>2,626</td><td>908,997</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>549,555</td><td></td><td>158</td><td>549,713</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income, net of tax:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>62</td><td></td><td>62</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gain associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax of $13,774</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>22,714</td><td></td><td>22,714</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive income</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>22,776</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>572,489</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Share-based compensation plans:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock issued under compensation plans</td><td>30</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Requisite service period recognition</td><td></td><td></td><td>3,345</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>3,345</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefit related to share-based compensation</td><td></td><td></td><td>7,771</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>7,771</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at December 29, 2013</td><td>259,029</td><td>$ 2,590</td><td>$ 1,653,119</td><td>$ (120,156)</td><td>$ (45,735)</td><td>$ 2,784</td><td>$ 1,492,602</td><td></td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>Fifty-Two Weeks</td><td>Fifty-Three Weeks</td><td>Fifty-Two Weeks</td></tr><tr><td>Ended</td><td>Ended</td><td>Ended</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td><td>December 25, 2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from operating activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>$ 549,713</td><td>$ 174,042</td><td>$ (495,690)</td></tr><tr><td>Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>150,523</td><td>147,414</td><td>209,061</td></tr><tr><td>Asset impairment</td><td>4,004</td><td>2,770</td><td>22,895</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)</td><td>3,382</td><td>(5,261)</td><td>9,980</td></tr><tr><td>Accretion of bond discount</td><td>456</td><td>456</td><td>453</td></tr><tr><td>Loss (gain) on property disposals</td><td>2,395</td><td>5,306</td><td>(4,271)</td></tr><tr><td>Share-based compensation</td><td>3,345</td><td>684</td><td>567</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred income tax benefit</td><td>(4,999)</td><td>(1,098)</td><td>(7,097)</td></tr><tr><td>Changes in operating assets and liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restricted cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—</td><td>12,680</td><td>53,273</td></tr><tr><td>Trade accounts and other receivables</td><td>7,235</td><td>(14,137)</td><td>(63,987)</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td>142,675</td><td>(65,870)</td><td>122,827</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets</td><td>(6,070)</td><td>(2,600)</td><td>27,068</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable and accrued expenses</td><td>49,625</td><td>(16,520)</td><td>(7,274)</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes</td><td>(21,546)</td><td>(33,714)</td><td>4,683</td></tr><tr><td>Deposits</td><td>1,877</td><td>1,783</td><td>2,174</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term pension and other postretirement obligations</td><td>(6,837)</td><td>(2,700)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>2,755</td><td>(3,611)</td><td>(3,653)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) operating activities</td><td>878,533</td><td>199,624</td><td>(128,991)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from investing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment</td><td>(116,223)</td><td>(90,327)</td><td>(135,968)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases of investment securities</td><td>(96,902)</td><td>(162)</td><td>(4,596)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from sale or maturity of investment securities</td><td>—</td><td>688</td><td>15,852</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from business disposals</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>37,479</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from property disposals</td><td>31,337</td><td>29,400</td><td>29,044</td></tr><tr><td>Cash used in investing activities</td><td>(181,788)</td><td>(60,401)</td><td>(58,189)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from financing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Payments on notes payable to JBS USA</td><td>—</td><td>(50,000)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from notes payable to JBS USA</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>50,000</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from long-term debt</td><td>505,600</td><td>851,400</td><td>965,689</td></tr><tr><td>Payments on long-term debt</td><td>(758,578)</td><td>(1,110,711)</td><td>(881,833)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from sale of common stock</td><td>—</td><td>198,282</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefit related to share-based compensation</td><td>7,770</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Purchase of remaining interest in joint venture</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(2,504)</td></tr><tr><td>Payment of capitalized loan costs</td><td>(5,006)</td><td>—</td><td>(4,395)</td></tr><tr><td>Other financing activities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(107)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td><td>(250,214)</td><td>(111,029)</td><td>126,850</td></tr><tr><td>Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>(6,505)</td><td>(1,623)</td><td>(4,138)</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>440,026</td><td>26,571</td><td>(64,468)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period</td><td>68,180</td><td>41,609</td><td>106,077</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, end of period</td><td>$ 508,206</td><td>$ 68,180</td><td>$ 41,609</td></tr><tr><td>Supplemental Disclosure Information:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest paid (net of amount capitalized)</td><td>$ 80,320</td><td>$ 96,657</td><td>$ 104,430</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes paid</td><td>$ 30,057</td><td>$ 10,931</td><td>$ 3,957</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



## 1. BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

## Business

Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (referred to herein as “Pilgrim’s,” “PPC,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or similar terms) is one of the largest chicken companies in the United States (“U.S.”), Mexico and Puerto Rico. Our fresh chicken retail line is sold in the southeastern, central, southwestern and western regions of the U.S., throughout Puerto Rico, and in the northern and central regions of Mexico. Our prepared-foods products meet the needs of some of the largest customers in the food service industry across the U.S. Additionally, the Company exports commodity chicken products to approximately 100 countries. As a vertically integrated company, we control every phase of the production of our products. We operate feed mills, hatcheries, processing plants and distribution centers in 12 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Our fresh chicken products consist of refrigerated (nonfrozen) whole or cut-up chicken, either pre-marinated or non-marinated, and prepackaged chicken in various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts. Our prepared chicken products include portion-controlled breast fillets, tenderloins and strips, delicatessen products, salads, formed nuggets and patties and bone-in chicken parts. These products are sold either refrigerated or frozen and may be fully cooked, partially cooked or raw. In addition, these products are breaded or non-breaded and either pre-marinated or non-marinated.

On December 1, 2008, Pilgrim’s and six of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”), seeking reorganization relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. We emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings on December 28, 2009. In connection with our emergence from bankruptcy, our common stock outstanding immediately prior to the emergence was cancelled and converted into the right to receive newly-issued shares of common stock of the reorganized Company based on a one-for-one exchange ratio, which constituted 36.0% of the total number of shares of our newly-issued common stock on that date. The remaining shares of our newly-issued common stock, constituting 64.0% of our total issued and outstanding common stock on December 28, 2009, were purchased for $800.0 million by JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (“JBS USA”), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of JBS S.A., a Brazil-based meat producer. As the result of subsequent purchases, JBS USA owned 75.5% of our total issued and outstanding common stock on December 29, 2013.

## Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company operates on the basis of a 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on the Sunday falling on or before December 31. The reader should assume any reference we make to a particular year (for example, 2013) in the notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements applies to our fiscal year and not the calendar year.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries. We eliminate all significant affiliate accounts and transactions upon consolidation.

The Company measures the financial statements of its Mexico subsidiaries as if the U.S. dollar were the functional currency. Accordingly, we remeasure assets and liabilities, other than non-monetary assets, of the Mexico subsidiaries at current exchange rates. We remeasure nonmonetary assets using the historical exchange rate in effect on the date of each asset's acquisition. We remeasure income and expenses at average exchange rates in effect during the period, except for certain accounts which are remeasured at a historical rate. Currency exchange gains or losses are included in the line item Foreign currency transaction losses (gains) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

## Reclassifications

We have made certain reclassifications to the 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements with no impact to reported net income (loss) in order to conform to the 2013 presentation.

## Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following circumstances are satisfied: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exits, (ii) price is fixed or determinable, (iii) collectability is reasonably assured and (iv) delivery has occurred. Delivery occurs in the period in which the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership of the products specified in the customer's purchase order or sales agreement. Revenue is recorded net of estimated incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. Revisions to these estimates are charged back to net sales in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues.



## Shipping and Handling Costs

Costs associated with the products shipped to customers are recognized in cost of sales.

## Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and totaled $4.9 million, $6.5 million and $9.6 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

## Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs totaled $3.9 million, $3.8 million and $5.0 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

## Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. The majority of the Company's disbursement bank accounts are zero balance accounts where cash needs are funded as checks are presented for payment by the holder. Checks issued pending clearance that result in overdraft balances for accounting purposes are classified as accounts payable and the change in the related balance is reflected in operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

## Current and Long-Term Investments

The Company’s current and long-term investments consist primarily of fixed income securities, municipal debt securities, bond and equity mutual funds and fund-of-funds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale. These securities are recorded at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Debt securities with remaining maturities of less than one year and those identified by management at the time of purchase for funding operations in less than one year are classified as current. Debt securities with remaining maturities greater than one year that management has not identified at the time of purchase for funding operations in less than one year are classified as long-term. Unrealized losses are charged against net earnings when a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary. Management reviews several factors to determine whether a loss is other than temporary, such as the length of time a security is in an unrealized loss position, the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, the impact of changing interest rates in the short and long term, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The Company determines the cost of each security sold and each amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings using the specific identification method. Purchases and sales are recorded on a trade date basis.

Investments in entities in which the Company has an ownership interest greater than 50% and exercises control over the entity are consolidated in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Investments in entities in which the Company has an ownership interest between 20% and 50% and exercises significant influence are accounted for using the equity method. The Company invests from time to time in ventures in which its ownership interest is less than 20% and over which it does not exercise significant influence. Such investments are accounted for under the cost method. The fair values for investments not traded on a quoted exchange are estimated based upon the historical performance of the ventures, the ventures' forecasted financial performance and management's evaluation of the ventures' viability and business models. To the extent the book value of an investment exceeds its assessed fair value, the Company will record an appropriate impairment charge. Thus, the carrying value of the Company's investments approximates fair value.

## Accounts Receivable

The Company records accounts receivable when revenue is recognized. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts, reducing our receivables balance to an amount we estimate is collectible from our customers. Estimates used in determining the allowance for doubtful accounts are based on historical collection experience, current trends, aging of accounts receivable, and periodic credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition. We write off accounts receivable when it becomes apparent, based upon age or customer circumstances, that such amounts will not be collected. Generally, the Company does not require collateral for its accounts receivable.

## Inventories

Live chicken inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and breeder hens at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or market. The costs associated with breeder hens are accumulated up to the production stage and amortized over their productive lives using the unit-of-production method. Finished poultry products, feed, eggs and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost (average) or market.



We record valuation adjustments for our inventory and for estimated obsolescence at or equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon known conditions affecting inventory, including significantly aged products, discontinued product lines, or damaged or obsolete products. We allocate meat costs between our various finished chicken products based on a by-product costing technique that reduces the cost of the whole bird by estimated yields and amounts to be recovered for certain by-product parts. This primarily includes leg quarters, wings, tenders and offal, which are carried in inventory at the estimated recovery amounts, with the remaining amount being reflected as our breast meat cost.

Generally, the Company performs an evaluation of whether any lower of cost or market adjustments are required at the country level based on a number of factors, including: (i) pools of related inventory, (ii) product continuation or discontinuation, (iii) estimated market selling prices and (iv) expected distribution channels. If actual market conditions or other factors are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory adjustments may be required.

## Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, and repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of these assets. Estimated useful lives for building, machinery and equipment are five to 33 years and for automobiles and trucks are three to ten years. The charge to income resulting from amortization of assets recorded under capital leases is included with depreciation expense.

The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets held for use when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. When the above is true, the impairment charge is determined based upon the amount the net book value of the assets exceeds their fair market value. In making these determinations, the Company utilizes certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, remaining length of service and estimated salvage values, (ii) estimated fair market value of the assets and (iii) determinations with respect to the lowest level of cash flows relevant to the respective impairment test, generally groupings of related operational facilities.

Given the interdependency of the Company’s individual facilities during the production process, which operate as a vertically integrated network, and the fact that the Company does not price the transfers of inventory between its vertically integrated facilities at market prices, it evaluates impairment of assets held for use at the country level (i.e., the U.S. and Mexico). Management believes this is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows for its assets that are held for use in production activities. At the present time, the Company’s forecasts indicate that it can recover the carrying value of its assets held for use based on the projected undiscounted cash flows of the operations. A key assumption in management’s forecast is that the Company’s sales volumes will return to historical margins as supply and demand between commodities and chicken and other animal-based proteins become more balanced. However, the exact timing of the return to historical margins is not certain, and if the return to historical margins is delayed, impairment charges could become necessary in the future.

The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets held for sale when the carrying amount of those assets exceeds their fair value less appropriate selling costs. Fair value is based on amounts documented in sales contracts or letters of intent accepted by the Company, amounts included in counteroffers initiated by the Company, or, in the absence of current contract negotiations, amounts determined using a sales comparison approach for real property and amounts determined using a cost approach for personal property. Under the sales comparison approach, sales and asking prices of reasonably comparable properties are considered to develop a range of unit prices within which the current real estate market is operating. Under the cost approach, a current cost to replace the asset new is calculated and then the estimated replacement cost is reduced to reflect the applicable decline in value resulting from physical deterioration, functional obsolescence and economic obsolescence. Appropriate selling costs includes reasonable broker's commissions, costs to produce title documents, filing fees, legal expenses and the like. We estimate appropriate closing costs as 4% to 6% of asset fair value. This range of rates is considered reasonable for our assets held for sale based on historical experience.

## Identified Intangible Assets

Our identified intangible assets consist of assets subject to amortization such as trade names, customer relationships and non-compete agreements. We calculate amortization of those assets that are subject to amortization on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The useful lives range from three to 15 years for trade names and non-compete agreements and 13 years for customer relationships.

We review intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates the carrying values of the assets may not be recoverable. We test intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment and estimate their fair values using the same assumptions and techniques we employ on property, plant and equipment.



## Litigation and Contingent Liabilities

The Company is subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to employment, environmental, product and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes, as well as potential ranges of probable losses, to these matters. The Company estimates the amount of reserves required for these contingencies when losses are determined to be probable and after considerable analysis of each individual issue. The Company expenses legal costs related to such loss contingencies as they are incurred. The accrual for environmental remediation liabilities is measured on an undiscounted basis. These reserves may change in the future due to changes in the Company’s assumptions, the effectiveness of strategies, or other factors beyond the Company’s control.

## Accrued Self Insurance

Insurance expense for casualty claims and employee-related health care benefits are estimated using historical and current experience and actuarial estimates. Stop-loss coverage is maintained with third-party insurers to limit the Company’s total exposure. Certain categories of claim liabilities are actuarially determined. The assumptions used to arrive at periodic expenses are reviewed regularly by management. However, actual expenses could differ from these estimates and could result in adjustments to be recognized.

## Income Taxes

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740-10-30-27 in the Expenses -Income Taxes topic with regards to members of a group that file a consolidated tax return but issue separate financial statements. The Company files its own U.S. federal tax return, but is included in certain state consolidated returns with JBS USA. The income tax expense of the Company is computed using the separate return method. The provision for income taxes has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities, net operating losses and tax credit carry forwards. The amount of deferred tax on these temporary differences is determined using the tax rates expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, as applicable, based on the tax rates and laws in the respective tax jurisdiction enacted as of the balance sheet date.

The Company reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, potential for carry back of tax losses, projected future taxable income, applicable tax strategies, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances have been established primarily for net operating loss carry forwards of certain foreign subsidiaries. See “Note 11. Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company deems its earnings from Mexico as of December 29, 2013 to be permanently reinvested. As such, U.S. deferred income taxes have not been provided on these earnings. If such earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested, certain deferred foreign and U.S. income taxes would be provided. For activity after 2008, the Company did not permanently reinvest its earnings in Puerto Rico. Therefore, net earnings generated in Puerto Rico have U.S. taxes provided as if the earnings were distributed.

The Company follows the provisions under ASC 740-10-25 that provides a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition of a tax benefit taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Tax benefits are recognized only when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the benefits will be sustained on examination. Tax benefits that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured using a probability weighting of the largest amount of tax benefit that has greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a particular tax benefit is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances evaluated in light of all available evidence as of the balance sheet date. See “Note 11. Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

## Pension and Other Postemployment Benefits

Our pension and other postemployment benefit costs and obligations are dependent on the various actuarial assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions relate to discount rates, long-term return on plan assets and other factors. We base the discount rate assumptions on current investment yields on high-quality corporate long-term bonds.



The salary growth assumptions reflect our long-term actual experience and future or near-term outlook. We determine the long-term return on plan assets based on historical portfolio results and management’s expectation of the future economic environment. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and, if in excess of the lesser of 10% of the projected benefit obligation or the fair market value of plan assets, amortized over either (i) the estimated average future service period of active plan participants if the plan is active or (ii) the estimated average future life expectancy of all plan participants if the plan is frozen.

## Operating Leases

Rent expense for operating leases is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term unless the lease contains an escalation clause which is not fixed or determinable. The lease term begins when we have the right to control the use of the leased property, which is typically before rent payments are due under the terms of the lease. If a lease has a fixed or determinable escalation clause, the difference between rent expense and rent paid is recorded as deferred rent and is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Rent for operating leases that do not have an escalation clause or where escalation is based on an inflation index is expensed over the lease term as it is payable.

## Risk Management

The Company attempts to mitigate commodity purchase exposures through a program of risk management that includes the use of forward purchase contractual obligations and derivative financial instruments. The Company will also occasionally purchase derivative financial instruments in an attempt to mitigate currency exchange rate exposure related to the net assets of its Mexico operations that are denominated in Mexican pesos. The Company's Mexico subsidiaries also attempt to mitigate the foreign currency exposure on certain U.S. dollar-denominated transactions through the use of derivative financial instruments. We recognize all derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. We elected not to designate derivative financial instruments executed to mitigate commodity purchase exposures and foreign currency exposures as hedges of forecasted transactions. Therefore, we recognize changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments immediately in earnings. Gains or losses related to the commodity derivative financial instruments are included in the line item Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Gains or losses related to the foreign currency derivative financial instruments are included in the line item Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

## Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We make significant estimates in regard to receivables collectability; inventory valuation; realization of deferred tax assets; valuation of long-lived assets; valuation of contingent liabilities, liabilities subject to compromise and self-insurance liabilities; valuation of pension and other postretirement benefits obligations; and valuation of acquired businesses.

## 2. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value must be categorized into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation:

Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability; or

Level 3 Unobservable inputs, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations.

The determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.



As of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, the Company held certain items that were required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included derivative assets and liabilities and deferred compensation plan assets. Derivative assets and liabilities consist of long and short positions on exchange-traded commodity and foreign currency derivative instruments. The Company maintains nonqualified deferred compensation plans for executives and other highly compensated employees. Investments are maintained within a trust and include money market funds, mutual funds and life insurance policies. The cash surrender value of the life insurance policies is invested primarily in mutual funds. The following items were measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="5">December 29, 2013</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Level 1</td><td rowspan="2">Level 2</td><td rowspan="2">Level 3</td><td rowspan="2">Total</td><td rowspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td>(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term investments in available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 96,902</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 96,902</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - commodity futures instruments</td><td>$ 1,494</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1,494</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - commodity options instruments</td><td>—</td><td>1,395</td><td>—</td><td>1,395</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - foreign currency futures instruments</td><td>1,214</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,214</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>7,208</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>7,208</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative liabilities - commodity futures instruments</td><td>(1,728)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1,728)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt and other borrowing arrangements:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Senior unsecured notes</td><td>552,592</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>552,592</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Term notes</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>424,650</td><td>424,650</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Capitalized lease obligations</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>704</td><td>704</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td rowspan="3">Level 1</td><td rowspan="3">Level 2</td><td rowspan="3">Level 3</td><td rowspan="3">Total</td></tr><tr><td>(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - commodity futures instruments</td><td>$ 1,821</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1,821</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>7,591</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>7,591</td></tr><tr><td>Derivative liabilities - commodity futures instruments</td><td>(1,530)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1,530)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt and other borrowing arrangements:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Senior unsecured notes</td><td>521,415</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>521,415</td></tr><tr><td>Term notes and revolver</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>686,435</td><td>686,435</td></tr><tr><td>Capitalized lease obligations</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>880</td><td>880</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Change in Value of Level 3 Liabilities:</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Balance, beginning of period</td><td>$ 686,435</td><td>$ 945,927</td><td>$ 880</td><td>$ 1,005</td></tr><tr><td>Borrowings</td><td>509,500</td><td>1,332,300</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Payments</td><td>(762,091)</td><td>(1,591,498)</td><td>(124)</td><td>(114)</td></tr><tr><td>Change in fair value inputs</td><td>(9,194)</td><td>(294)</td><td>(52)</td><td>(11)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance, end of period</td><td>$ 424,650</td><td>$ 686,435</td><td>$ 704</td><td>$ 880</td></tr></table>

The valuation of financial assets and liabilities classified in Level 1 is determined using a market approach, taking into account current interest rates, creditworthiness, and liquidity risks in relation to current market conditions, and is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets. The valuation of financial assets and liabilities in Level 2 is determined using a market approach based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or other inputs that are observable for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. The valuation of financial assets in Level 3 is determined using an income approach based on unobservable inputs such as discounted cash flow models or valuations.



In addition to the fair value disclosure requirements related to financial instruments carried at fair value, accounting standards require interim disclosures regarding the fair value of all of the Company’s financial instruments. The methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments and any changes in methods or significant assumptions from prior periods are also required to be disclosed. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="3">December 29, 2013</td><td colspan="3">December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Carrying</td><td colspan="2">Fair</td><td>Carrying</td><td colspan="2">Fair</td></tr><tr><td>Amount</td><td>Value</td><td></td><td>Amount</td><td>Value</td><td>Reference</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term investments in available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 96,902</td><td>$ 96,902</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - commodity futures instruments</td><td>1,494</td><td>1,494</td><td>1,824</td><td>1,824</td><td>1,824</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - commodity options instruments</td><td>1,395</td><td>1,395</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Derivative assets - foreign currency futures instruments</td><td>1,214</td><td>1,214</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>7,208</td><td>7,208</td><td>7,591</td><td>7,591</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Derivative liabilities - commodity futures instruments</td><td>(1,728)</td><td>(1,728)</td><td>(1,530)</td><td>(1,530)</td><td></td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt and other borrowing arrangements</td><td>(912,233)</td><td>(977,946)</td><td>(1,164,756)</td><td>(1,208,730)</td><td></td><td>10</td></tr></table>

The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents, derivative trading accounts' margin cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain other liabilities approximate their fair values due to their relatively short maturities. Derivative assets were recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices and are included in the line item Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Deferred compensation plan assets were recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices and are included in the line item Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices and are included in the line item Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair values of the Company's long-term debt and other borrowing arrangements were estimated by calculating the net present value of future payments for each debt obligation or borrowing by: (i) using a risk-free rate applicable for an instrument with a life similar to the remaining life of each debt obligation or borrowing plus the current estimated credit risk spread for the Company or (ii) using the quoted market price at December 29, 2013 or December 30, 2012, as applicable.

In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company records certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges when required by U.S. GAAP. Certain long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying amount of $27.5 million were written down to their fair value of $23.9 million, resulting in a loss of $3.6 million recorded in earnings during 2013. These assets are classified as Level 2 assets because their fair value can be corroborated based on observable market data.

## 3. TRADE ACCOUNTS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Trade accounts and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts, consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">December 29, 2013</td><td colspan="2">December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Trade accounts receivable</td><td>$     369,715</td><td>$</td><td>381,747</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Receivables from officers and employees</td><td>14</td><td></td><td>48</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other receivables</td><td>11,005</td><td></td><td>6,892</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Receivables, gross</td><td>380,734</td><td></td><td>388,687</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>(4,056)</td><td></td><td>(3,757)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Receivables, net</td><td>$     376,678</td><td>$</td><td>384,930</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accounts receivable from JBS USA, LLC</td><td>$     2,388</td><td>$</td><td>1,514</td><td></td></tr></table>



## 4. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Live chicken and hens</td><td>$ 368,582</td><td>$ 405,335</td></tr><tr><td>Feed, eggs and other</td><td>216,045</td><td>307,500</td></tr><tr><td>Finished chicken products</td><td>223,932</td><td>237,159</td></tr><tr><td>Total chicken inventories</td><td>808,559</td><td>949,994</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial feed, table eggs and other</td><td>273</td><td>302</td></tr><tr><td>Total inventories</td><td>$ 808,832</td><td>$ 950,296</td></tr></table>

## 5. INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES

We recognize investments in available-for-sale securities as cash equivalents, current investments or long-term investments depending upon each security's length to maturity. Additionally, those securities identified by management at the time of purchase for funding operations in less than one year are classified as current.

The following table summarizes our investments in available-for-sale securities:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="2">December 29, 2013</td><td colspan="2">December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amortized</td><td>Fair</td><td>Amortized</td><td>Fair</td></tr><tr><td>Cost</td><td>Value</td><td>Cost</td><td>Value</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Current investments:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities</td><td>$ 96,902</td><td>$ 96,902</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr></table>

The Company and certain retirement plans that it sponsors invest in a variety of financial instruments. Certain postretirement funds in which the Company participates hold significant amounts of mortgage-backed securities. However, none of the mortgages collateralizing these securities are considered subprime.

## 6. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company utilizes various raw materials in its operations, including corn, soybean meal, soybean oil, sorghum, natural gas, electricity and diesel fuel, which are all considered commodities. The Company considers these raw materials generally available from a number of different sources and believes it can obtain them to meet its requirements. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations and related price risk due to factors beyond our control, such as economic and political conditions, supply and demand, weather, governmental regulation and other circumstances. Generally, the Company purchases derivative financial instruments, specifically exchange-traded futures and options, in an attempt to mitigate price risk related to its anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for approximately the next 12 months. The Company may purchase longer-term derivative financial instruments on particular commodities if deemed appropriate. The Company will sometimes take a short position on a derivative instrument to minimize the impact of a commodity's price volatility on its operating results. The Company will also occasionally purchase derivative financial instruments in an attempt to mitigate currency exchange rate exposure related to the net assets of its Mexico operations that are denominated in Mexican pesos. The fair value of derivative assets is included in the line item Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets while the fair value of derivative liabilities is included in the line item Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the same statements. Our counterparties require that we post cash collateral for changes in the net fair value of the derivative contracts.

We have not designated the derivative financial instruments that we have purchased to mitigate commodity purchase or foreign currency transaction exposures as cash flow hedges. Therefore, we recognize changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments immediately in earnings. Gains or losses related to these derivative financial instruments are included in either the line item Cost of sales or the line item Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations based upon the business purpose of the associated exposure. The Company recognized $25.1 million, $8.3 million and $63.8 million in net gains related to changes in the fair value of its derivative financial instruments during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.



Information regarding the Company's outstanding derivative instruments and cash collateral posted with (owed to) brokers is included in the following table:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(Fair values in thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Fair values:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Commodity derivative assets</td><td>$ 2,889</td><td>$ 1,821</td></tr><tr><td>Commodity derivative liabilities</td><td>(1,728)</td><td>(1,530)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash collateral posted with (owed to) brokers</td><td>4,142</td><td>(166)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency derivative assets, gross</td><td>1,214</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Derivatives Coverage \( ^{(a)} \) :</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Corn</td><td>1.1%</td><td>—%</td></tr><tr><td>Soybean meal</td><td>(3.6)%</td><td>—%</td></tr><tr><td>Period through which stated percent of needs are covered:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Corn</td><td>September 2015</td><td>December 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Soybean meal</td><td>July 2014</td><td>December 2013</td></tr></table>

(a) Derivatives coverage is the percent of anticipated corn and soybean meal needs covered by outstanding derivative instruments through a specified date.

## 7. IDENTIFIED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Identified intangible assets consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Useful Life (Years)</td><td>Original Cost</td><td>Accumulated Amortization</td><td>Carrying Amount</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>December 30, 2012:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade names</td><td>3-15</td><td>$ 40,143</td><td>$ (29,263)</td><td>$ 10,880</td></tr><tr><td>Customer relationships</td><td>13</td><td>51,000</td><td>(23,614)</td><td>27,386</td></tr><tr><td>Non-compete agreements</td><td>3</td><td>300</td><td>(300)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total intangible assets</td><td></td><td>91,443</td><td>(53,177)</td><td>38,266</td></tr><tr><td>December 29, 2013:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade names</td><td>3-15</td><td>40,143</td><td>(31,081)</td><td>9,062</td></tr><tr><td>Customer relationships</td><td>13</td><td>51,000</td><td>(27,537)</td><td>23,463</td></tr><tr><td>Non-compete agreements</td><td>3</td><td>300</td><td>(300)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total intangible assets</td><td></td><td>$ 91,443</td><td>$ (58,918)</td><td>$ 32,525</td></tr></table>

We recognized amortization expense related to identified intangible assets of $5.7 million in 2013, $5.8 million in 2012 and $5.7 million in 2011.

We expect to recognize amortization expense associated with identified intangible assets of $5.7 million in each year from 2014 through 2016, $5.8 million in 2017 and $5.6 million in 2018.



## 8. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”), net consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Land</td><td>$ 66,071</td><td>$ 63,788</td></tr><tr><td>Buildings</td><td>1,077,859</td><td>1,081,059</td></tr><tr><td>Machinery and equipment</td><td>1,502,968</td><td>1,498,280</td></tr><tr><td>Autos and trucks</td><td>55,779</td><td>58,526</td></tr><tr><td>Construction-in-progress</td><td>66,926</td><td>47,927</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, gross</td><td>2,769,603</td><td>2,749,580</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated depreciation</td><td>(1,617,792)</td><td>(1,559,659)</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, net</td><td>$ 1,151,811</td><td>$ 1,189,921</td></tr></table>

The Company recognized depreciation expense of $135.5 million, $131.5 million and $192.6 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

During 2013, the Company sold certain PP&E for cash of $31.3 million and recognized a loss of $2.4 million. PP&E sold in 2013 included vehicle maintenance centers in Texas, Arkansas, and Georgia, excess land in Texas, a hatchery in North Carolina, a complex in Arkansas, an office building in Georgia, and miscellaneous equipment. During 2012, the Company sold certain PP&E for cash of $29.4 million and recognized a loss of $5.3 million. PP&E sold in 2012 included a commercial egg operation in Texas, a vacant office building in Texas, an idled processing plant and broiler farm in Georgia, an idled feed mill in Arkansas, idled hatcheries in Alabama, Arkansas and Georgia, an idled distribution center in Louisiana, various broiler and breeder farms in Texas, both developed and undeveloped land in Texas and miscellaneous processing equipment.

The Company scrapped certain unused or obsolete PP&E recognizing a net loss of $4.6 million and $4.0 million during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

As part of the exit or disposal activities discussed in “Note 15. Exit or Disposal Activities,” the Company closed or idled (i) processing facilities in Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas and Texas, (ii) feed mills in North Carolina and Arkansas, (iii) hatcheries in Alabama, Texas, Arkansas and North Carolina, (iv) various broiler farms in Texas and Alabama (v) a vehicle maintenance center in Arkansas and (vi) other miscellaneous assets. Neither the Board of Directors nor JBS USA has determined if it would be in the best interest of the Company to divest any of these idled assets. Management is therefore not certain that it can or will divest any of these assets within one year, is not actively marketing these assets and, accordingly, has not classified them as assets held for sale. The Company continues to depreciate these assets. At December 29, 2013, the carrying amount of these idled assets was $53.8 million based on depreciable value of $134.6 million and accumulated depreciation of $80.8 million.

Management has committed to the sale of certain properties and related assets, including, but not limited to (i) processing plants in Louisiana and Pennsylvania, (ii) a warehouse in Texas, (iii) vehicle maintenance centers in Texas and Georgia, (iv) a fertilizer building in Texas, (v) a hatchery in North Carolina, and (vi) other miscellaneous assets, as such assets no longer fit into the operating plans of the Company. The Company is actively marketing these properties and related assets for immediate sale and believes a sale of each property can be consummated within the next 12 months. At December 29, 2013, the Company reported assets held for sale totaling $7.0 million in Assets held for sale on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. In 2013, the Company recognized administrative restructuring charges totaling $3.6 million to impair the carrying amounts of certain assets held for sale to fair value.

The Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets held for use during the thirteen weeks ended December 29, 2013 by comparing the book value of its invested capital, exclusive of assets held for sale, with the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of its long-lived assets held for use. The Company determined that the carrying amount of its long-lived assets held for use is recoverable over the remaining life of the primary asset in the group, and the long-lived assets for use pass the Step 1 recoverability test of ASC 360-10-35, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.



## 9. CURRENT LIABILITIES

Current liabilities, other than income taxes and current maturities of long-term debt, consisted of the following components:

<table><tr><td></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade accounts</td><td>$ 313,266</td><td>$ 252,644</td></tr><tr><td>Book overdrafts</td><td>55,378</td><td>58,066</td></tr><tr><td>Other payables</td><td>1,716</td><td>1,655</td></tr><tr><td>Total accounts payable</td><td>370,360</td><td>312,365</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable to JBS USA, LLC</td><td>3,934</td><td>13,436</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Compensation and benefits</td><td>100,965</td><td>77,376</td></tr><tr><td>Interest and debt-related fees</td><td>7,558</td><td>10,740</td></tr><tr><td>Insurance and self-insured claims</td><td>99,244</td><td>108,806</td></tr><tr><td>Commodity derivative liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Futures</td><td>1,729</td><td>1,530</td></tr><tr><td>Other accrued expenses</td><td>73,859</td><td>85,088</td></tr><tr><td>Total accrued expenses</td><td>283,355</td><td>283,540</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$ 657,649</td><td>$ 609,341</td></tr></table>

## 10. LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS

Long-term debt consisted of the following components:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Maturity</td><td colspan="2">December 29, 2013</td><td colspan="2">December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Senior notes, at 7 7/8%, net of unaccreted discount</td><td>2018</td><td>$</td><td>497,757</td><td>$</td><td>497,301</td></tr><tr><td>The U.S. Credit Facility Term B-1 note payable at 2.4375%</td><td>2014</td><td></td><td>204,880</td><td></td><td>275,443</td></tr><tr><td>The U.S. Credit Facility Term B-2 note payable at 9.00%</td><td>2014</td><td></td><td>205,219</td><td></td><td>283,647</td></tr><tr><td>Revolving note payable on which the Company had funds borrowed at 4.25% and 6.25%</td><td>2018</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>103,600</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico Credit Facility (defined below) with notes payable at TIIE Rate plus 2.25% or Equilibrium Interbank Interest Rate plus 4.50%</td><td>2014</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>Various</td><td></td><td>4,377</td><td></td><td>4,765</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td></td><td></td><td>912,233</td><td></td><td>1,164,756</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Current maturities of long-term debt</td><td></td><td></td><td>(410,234)</td><td></td><td>(15,886)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt, less current maturities</td><td></td><td>$</td><td>501,999</td><td>$</td><td>1,148,870</td></tr></table>

## Senior and Subordinated Notes

At December 29, 2013, the Company had an aggregate principal balance of $500.0 million of 7 7/8% senior notes due 2018 (the "2018 Notes") outstanding that are registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The 2018 Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are guaranteed by one of the Company's subsidiaries. Interest is payable on December 15 and June 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The indenture governing the 2018 Notes contains various covenants that may adversely affect our ability, among other things, to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain restricted payments, consummate certain asset sales, enter into certain transactions with JBS USA and our other affiliates, merge, consolidate and/or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. Additionally, we have an aggregate principal balance of $3.6 million of 7 7/8% senior unsecured notes and 8 3/8% senior subordinated unsecured notes outstanding at December 29, 2013.



## JBS Subordinated Loan Agreement

On June 23, 2011, the Company entered into a Subordinated Loan Agreement with JBS USA (the "Subordinated Loan Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Subordinated Loan Agreement, the Company agreed to reimburse JBS USA up to $56.5 million for draws upon any letters of credit issued for JBS USA's account that support certain obligations of the Company or its subsidiaries. JBS USA agreed to arrange for letters of credit to be issued on its account in the amount of $56.5 million to an insurance company serving the Company in order to allow that insurance company to return cash it held as collateral against potential workers compensation, auto and general liability claims. In return for providing this letter of credit, the Company has agreed to reimburse JBS USA for the letter of credit cost the Company would otherwise incur under its U.S. Credit Facility (as defined below). The total amount paid by the Company for 2013, 2012 and 2011 costs, to reimburse JBS USA, was $2.2 million, $2.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of December 29, 2013, the Company has accrued an obligation of $0.1 million to reimburse JBS USA for letter of credit costs incurred on its behalf. There remains no other commitment to make advances by JBS USA under the Subordinated Loan Agreement.

## U.S. Credit Facility

Pilgrim’s and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “U.S. Credit Facility”) with CoBank, ACB, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and other lenders party thereto, which was amended and restated on August 7, 2013. The U.S. Credit Facility currently provides for a $700.0 million revolving credit facility, a Term B facility of approximately $410.1 million and a delayed draw term loan commitment of up to $400 million (the “Delayed Draw Term Loans”). The Company can draw upon the Delayed Draw Term Loan commitment, in one or more advances, between May 1, 2014 and December 28, 2014. The U.S. Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature that allows us, at any time, to increase the aggregate revolving loan commitment by up to an additional $250.0 million and to increase the aggregate Delayed Draw Term Loan commitment by up to an additional $500.0 million, in each case subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including obtaining the lenders’ agreement to participate in the increase and an aggregate limit on all commitments under the U.S. Credit Facility of $1.85 billion. The U.S. Credit Facility also provides for a $100 million sub-limit for swingline loans and a $200 million sub-limit for letters of credit. The Term B Loans mature on December 28, 2014 with all principal and unpaid interest due at maturity. The revolving loan commitment under the U.S. Credit Facility matures on August 7, 2018. Any Delayed Draw Term Loans would be payable in quarterly installments beginning in fiscal year 2015 equal to 1.875% of the principal outstanding as of December 28, 2014, with all remaining principal and interest due at maturity on August 7, 2018.

On December 28, 2009, the Company paid loan costs totaling $50.0 million related to the U.S. Credit Facility that it recognized as an asset on its balance sheet. On August 7, 2013, the Company paid loan costs totaling $5.0 million related to the amendment and restatement to the U.S. Credit Facility that is recognized as an asset on its balance sheet. The Company amortizes these capitalized costs to interest expense over the life of the U.S. Credit Facility.

Subsequent to the end of each fiscal year, a portion of our cash flow must be used to repay outstanding principal amounts under the Term B loans. With respect to 2013, the Company paid $204.9 million of its cash flow toward the outstanding principal under the Term B-1 loans on December 30, 2013, and expects to pay approximately $205.2 million of its cash flow toward the outstanding principal under the Term B-2 loans on April 28, 2014. Following the April 28, 2014 payment, the Company will have no outstanding principal under the Term B loans. The U.S. Credit Facility also requires us to use the proceeds we receive from certain asset sales and specified debt or equity issuances and upon the occurrence of other events to repay outstanding borrowings under the U.S. Credit Facility. On December 29, 2013, a principal amount of $410.1 million under the Term B loans commitment was outstanding.

Actual borrowings by the Company under the revolving credit commitment component of the U.S. Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base, which is a formula based on certain eligible inventory, eligible receivables and restricted cash under the control of CoBank, ACB. As of December 29, 2013, the applicable borrowing base was $695.4 million, the amount available for borrowing under the revolving loan commitment was $665.8 million. The Company had letters of credit of $29.6 million and no outstanding borrowings under the revolving loan commitment as of December 29, 2013.

The U.S. Credit Facility contains financial covenants and various other covenants that may adversely affect our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain restricted payments, consummate certain assets sales, enter into certain transactions with JBS USA and our other affiliates, merge, consolidate and/or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. The U.S. Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with a minimum level of tangible net worth covenant. The Company is currently in compliance with this financial covenant. All other financial covenants were eliminated in connection with the August 7, 2013 amendment and restatement to the U.S. Credit Facility. The U.S. Credit Facility also provides that the Company may not incur capital expenditures in excess of $350.0 million in any fiscal year.



All obligations under the U.S. Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority lien on (i) the accounts receivable and inventories of the Company and its non-Mexico subsidiaries, (ii) 65% of the equity interests in the Company’s direct foreign subsidiaries and 100% of the equity interests in the Company’s other subsidiaries, (iii) substantially all of the personal property and intangibles of the borrowers and guarantors under the U.S. Credit Facility and (iv) substantially all of the real estate and fixed assets of the Company and the guarantor subsidiaries under the U.S. Credit Facility.

## Mexico Credit Facility

On October 19, 2011, Avícola Pilgrim’s Pride de México, S.A. de C.V. (“Avícola”), Pilgrim’s Pride S. de R.L. de C.V. and certain other Mexican subsidiaries entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Mexico Credit Facility”) with ING Bank (México), S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, ING Grupo Financiero, as lender and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The Mexico Credit Facility has a final maturity date of September 25, 2014. The Mexico Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Mexico subsidiaries. As of December 29, 2013, the U.S. dollar-equivalent of the loan commitment under the Mexico Credit Facility was $42.7 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Mexico Credit Facility at December 29, 2013.

Under the Mexico Credit Facility, if (i) any default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or (ii) the quotient of the borrowing base divided by the outstanding loans and letters of credit (the “Collateral Coverage Ratio”) under the Mexico Credit Facility is less than 1.25 to 1.00, the loans and letters of credit under the Mexico Credit Facility will be subject to, and cannot exceed, a borrowing base. The borrowing base is a formula based on accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid assets, net cash under the control of the administrative agent and up to 150.0 million Mexican pesos of fixed assets of our Mexico subsidiaries party to the Mexico Credit Facility. The borrowing base formula will be reduced by trade payables of those Mexico subsidiaries. If the Collateral Coverage Ratio falls below 1.25 to 1.00, the borrowing base requirement would terminate upon the earlier of (i) the Collateral Coverage Ratio exceeding 1.25 to 1.00 as of the latest measurement period for 60 consecutive days or (ii) the borrowing availability under the Mexico Credit Facility being equal to or greater than the greater of 20% of the revolving commitments under the Mexico Credit Facility and 100.0 million Mexican pesos for a period of 60 consecutive days.

Avícola may pay dividends or make other restricted payments to the Company in an amount not to exceed in the aggregate 250.0 million Mexican pesos during the term of the Mexico Credit Facility if certain conditions are satisfied, including a condition that availability is at least 100% of the revolving loan commitment under the Mexico Credit Facility, less any letter of credit liability under the Mexico Credit Facility. However, the Company deems its earnings from Mexico as of December 29, 2013 to be permanently reinvested. As such, U.S. deferred income taxes have not been provided on these earnings. If such earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested, certain deferred foreign and U.S. income taxes would be provided.

## Other Disclosures

Substantially all of our domestic inventories and domestic fixed assets are pledged as collateral to secure the obligations under the U.S. Credit Facility. The Mexico Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company's Mexico subsidiaries.

Annual maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to December 29, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

<table><tr><td>2014</td><td>$ 410,234</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>86</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>3,611</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>500,102</td></tr><tr><td>Thereafter</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>Total maturities</td><td>914,476</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Amount representing original issue discount, net of accretion</td><td>(2,243)</td></tr><tr><td>Total long-term debt</td><td>$ 912,233</td></tr></table>

Total interest expense was $87.0 million, $104.9 million and $111.5 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest related to new construction capitalized in 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $2.2 million, $1.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively.



## 11. INCOME TAXES

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes by jurisdiction is as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td><td rowspan="2">2011</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>U.S.</td><td>$ 469,395</td><td>$ 62,332</td><td>$ (481,048)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign</td><td>104,545</td><td>90,730</td><td>(6,078)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 573,940</td><td>$ 153,062</td><td>$ (487,126)</td><td></td></tr></table>

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are set forth below:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td><td rowspan="2">2011</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Current:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Federal</td><td>$ (427)</td><td>$ (28,883)</td><td>$ 741</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign</td><td>26,206</td><td>9,279</td><td>13,132</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>State and other</td><td>3,512</td><td>(211)</td><td>1,914</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total current</td><td>29,291</td><td>(19,815)</td><td>15,787</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Federal</td><td>22,923</td><td>(293)</td><td>(9,128)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign</td><td>(3,648)</td><td>(835)</td><td>1,033</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>State and other</td><td>(24,339)</td><td>(37)</td><td>872</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total deferred</td><td>(5,064)</td><td>(1,165)</td><td>(7,223)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$ 24,227</td><td>$ (20,980)</td><td>$ 8,564</td><td></td></tr></table>

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for 2013 was 4.2% compared to (13.7)% for 2012. The effective tax rate for 2013 differed from 2012 primarily as a result of smaller decreases in the valuation allowance and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits during 2013 compared to decreases in the valuation allowance and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits during 2012.

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for 2011 was (1.8)%. The effective tax rate for 2012 differed from 2011 primarily as a result of decreases in the valuation allowance and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits during 2012 and increases in the valuation allowance and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits during 2011.



The following table reconciles the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Federal income tax rate</td><td>35.0%</td><td>35.0%</td><td>35.0%</td></tr><tr><td>State tax rate, net</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>Permanent items</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.5</td><td>(0.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Permanent items - reorganization costs</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Domestic production activity</td><td>(1.2)</td><td>—</td><td>(0.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Difference in U.S. statutory tax rate and foreign country effective tax rate</td><td>(1.0)</td><td>(3.3)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Tax credits</td><td>(3.0)</td><td>(2.3)</td><td>1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Change in reserve for unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>—</td><td>(10.4)</td><td>(2.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Change in valuation allowance</td><td>(31.0)</td><td>(34.4)</td><td>(35.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Change in tax legislation</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>1.7</td><td>(2.3)</td><td>(2.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>4.2%</td><td>(13.7)%</td><td>(1.8)%</td></tr></table>

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="2">December 29, 2013</td><td colspan="2">December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PP&amp;E and identified intangible assets</td><td>$ 125,197</td><td>$ 124,921</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td>74,287</td><td>107,420</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Insurance claims and losses</td><td>33,625</td><td>28,701</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>All other current</td><td>9,453</td><td>24,857</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>All other noncurrent</td><td>9,031</td><td>9,957</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total deferred tax liabilities</td><td>251,593</td><td>295,856</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax assets:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net operating losses</td><td>20,907</td><td>244,151</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign net operating losses</td><td>15,437</td><td>19,113</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Credit carry forwards</td><td>79,555</td><td>60,129</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>4,510</td><td>5,583</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accrued liabilities</td><td>47,384</td><td>41,808</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>All other current</td><td>12,282</td><td>581</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>All other noncurrent</td><td>10,292</td><td>3,627</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Workers compensation</td><td>42,951</td><td>45,320</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Pension and other postretirement benefits</td><td>20,364</td><td>56,847</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total deferred tax assets</td><td>253,682</td><td>477,159</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Valuation allowance</td><td>(10,400)</td><td>(188,354)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net deferred tax assets</td><td>243,282</td><td>288,805</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net deferred tax liabilities</td><td>$ 8,311</td><td>$ 7,051</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carry back and carry forward periods), projected future taxable income and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment.



As of December 29, 2013, the Company believes it has sufficient positive evidence to conclude that realization of its federal and state net deferred tax assets is more likely than not to be realized. The decrease in valuation allowance of $178.0 million during 2013 was primarily due to a decrease in federal, state and foreign net operating losses. As of December 29, 2013, the Company's valuation allowance is $10.4 million, of which $1.9 million relates to capital loss carry forwards and $8.5 million relates to its Mexico operations.

As of December 29, 2013, the Company had state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $459.6 million that will begin to expire in 2014. The Company also had Mexico net operating loss carry forwards at December 29, 2013 of approximately $51.5 million that begin to expire in 2014.

As of December 29, 2013, the Company had approximately $63.2 million of federal tax credit carry forwards that will begin to expire in 2024 and $2.7 million of state tax credit carry forwards that begin to expire in 2014.

On November 6, 2009, H.R. 3548 was signed into law and included a provision that allowed most business taxpayers an increased carry back period for net operating losses incurred in 2008 or 2009. As a result, during 2009 the Company utilized $547.7 million of its U.S. federal net operating losses under the expanded carry back provisions of H.R. 3548 and filed a claim for refund of $169.7 million. The Company received $122.6 million in refunds from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) from the carry back claims during 2010. The Company anticipates receipt of the remainder of its claim pending resolution of its litigation with the IRS. See “Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "IRC"), imposes an annual limit on the ability of a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” to use its U.S. net operating losses and tax credits to reduce its tax liability. The Company experienced an ownership change in December 2009, but believes that utilization of the U.S. net operating losses and tax credits will not be hindered by the Section 382 limitation.

The Company has not provided any deferred income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its Mexico subsidiaries as of December 29, 2013 based upon the determination that such earnings will be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the amount of incremental taxes that might arise if these earnings were to be remitted. For activity after 2008, the Company is not permanently reinvesting its earnings in Puerto Rico. Therefore, the earnings generated in Puerto Rico have U.S. taxes provided on the earnings as if the earnings were distributed.

During 2011, the Company completed its deconsolidation of its Mexico operations from a tax perspective to help minimize the impact of the Mexico tax reform that became effective January 1, 2010. As a result, all of the Mexico subsidiaries started filing separate returns in 2011. The deconsolidation reduced the accrued taxes that had been previously recognized under the consolidated filing status as it eliminated recapturing certain taxes required under the new consolidation laws. As a result of the deconsolidation, the Company recognized a benefit of $4.3 million and $29.5 million during 2011 and 2010, respectively, which reduced the additional taxes that had been previously accrued as of December 27, 2009, resulting in a total net benefit of $18.4 million.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year</td><td>$ 16,643</td><td>$ 64,808</td></tr><tr><td>Increase as a result of tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>978</td><td>926</td></tr><tr><td>Increase as a result of tax positions taken during prior years</td><td>232</td><td>119</td></tr><tr><td>Decrease as a result of tax positions taken during prior years</td><td>—</td><td>(27,619)</td></tr><tr><td>Decrease for lapse in statute of limitations</td><td>(736)</td><td>(13,670)</td></tr><tr><td>Decrease relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>—</td><td>(7,921)</td></tr><tr><td>Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year</td><td>$ 17,117</td><td>$ 16,643</td></tr></table>

Included in unrecognized tax benefits of $17.1 million at December 29, 2013, was $10.9 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company's effective tax rate. It is not practicable at this time to estimate the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that will change in the next twelve months.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes. As of December 29, 2013, the Company had recorded a liability of $9.9 million for interest and penalties. During 2013, accrued interest and penalty amounts related to uncertain tax positions remained unchanged from 2012.



The Company operates in the U.S. (including multiple state jurisdictions), Puerto Rico and Mexico. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations for years prior to 2008 and is no longer subject to Mexico income tax examinations by taxing authorities for years prior to 2008.

The Company is currently working with the IRS through the normal processes and procedures that are available to all taxpayers outside of bankruptcy to resolve the IRS' proof of claim. In connection, the Company has filed various petitions in the United States Tax Court (“Tax Court”) in response to the Notices of Deficiency that were issued to the Company. On December 12, 2012, the Company entered into two Stipulation of Settled Issues (“Stipulation” or “Stipulations”) with the IRS that resolved a portion of the IRS’ proof of claim. The Company is pursuing the IRS’ amended proof of claim relating to the tax year ended June 20, 2004 for Gold Kist Inc. (“Gold Kist”). See “Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information.

On September 13, 2013, the IRS issued the final, revised Tangible Property Repair Regulations for IRC Sections 162(a) and 263(a) which modify and supersede the Temporary Regulations that were issued on December 23, 2011. In addition, the IRS also released new proposed regulations for dispositions of tangible property under IRC Section 168. These final and proposed regulations are effective for tax years beginning January 1, 2014. The Company assessed the applicability of the regulations and concluded there was no significant impact to the Company’s tax fixed assets.

## 12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Company sponsors programs that provide retirement benefits to most of its employees. These programs include qualified defined benefit pension plans, nonqualified defined benefit retirement plans, a defined benefit postretirement life insurance plan, and defined contribution retirement savings plans. Under all of our retirement plans, the Company’s expenses were $7.5 million, $8.7 million and $7.9 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company used a year-end measurement date of December 29, 2013 for its pension and postretirement benefits plans. Certain disclosures are listed below. Other disclosures are not material to the financial statements.

## Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The Company sponsors two qualified defined benefit pension plans named the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Plan for Union Employees (the “Union Plan”) and the Pilgrim’s Pride Pension Plan for Legacy Gold Kist Employees (the “GK Pension Plan”). The Union Plan covers certain locations or work groups within PPC. The GK Pension Plan covers certain eligible U.S. employees who were employed at locations that the Company purchased through its acquisition of Gold Kist in 2007. Participation in the GK Pension Plan was frozen as of February 8, 2007 for all participants with the exception of terminated vested participants who are or may become permanently and totally disabled. The plan was frozen for that group as of March 31, 2007.

## Nonqualified Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The Company sponsors two nonqualified defined benefit retirement plans named the Former Gold Kist Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP Plan”) and the Former Gold Kist Inc. Directors’ Emeriti Retirement Plan (the “Directors’ Emeriti Plan”). Pilgrim’s Pride assumed sponsorship of the SERP Plan and Directors’ Emeriti Plan through its acquisition of Gold Kist in 2007. The SERP Plan provides benefits on compensation in excess of certain IRC limitations to certain former executives with whom Gold Kist negotiated individual agreements. Benefits under the SERP Plan were frozen as of February 8, 2007. The Directors’ Emeriti Plan provides benefits to former Gold Kist directors.

## Defined Benefit Postretirement Life Insurance Plan

The Company sponsors one defined benefit postretirement life insurance plan named the Gold Kist Inc. Retiree Life Insurance Plan (the “Retiree Life Plan”). Pilgrim’s Pride also assumed defined benefit postretirement medical and life insurance obligations, including the Retiree Life Plan, through its acquisition of Gold Kist in 2007. In January 2001, Gold Kist began to substantially curtail its programs for active employees. On July 1, 2003, Gold Kist terminated medical coverage for retirees age 65 or older, and only retired employees in the closed group between ages 55 and 65 could continue their coverage at rates above the average cost of the medical insurance plan for active employees. These retired employees all reached the age of 65 in 2012 and liabilities of the postretirement medical plan then ended.



## Defined Benefit Plans Obligations and Assets

The change in benefit obligation, change in fair value of plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these plans were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Change in projected benefit obligation:</td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year</td><td>$ 194,434</td><td>$ 167,931</td><td>$ 1,933</td><td>$ 1,961</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost</td><td>—</td><td>51</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>7,954</td><td>8,272</td><td>78</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial losses (gains)</td><td>(24,315)</td><td>24,872</td><td>(92)</td><td>159</td></tr><tr><td>Benefits paid</td><td>(8,043)</td><td>(6,692)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Curtailments and settlements</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(214)</td><td>(283)</td></tr><tr><td>Projected benefit obligation, end of year</td><td>$ 170,030</td><td>$ 194,434</td><td>$ 1,705</td><td>$ 1,933</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Change in plan assets:</td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year</td><td>$ 92,283</td><td>$ 81,193</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Actual return on plan assets</td><td>16,489</td><td>8,013</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Contributions by employer</td><td>7,767</td><td>9,769</td><td>214</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>Benefits paid</td><td>(8,043)</td><td>(6,692)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Curtailments and settlements</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(214)</td><td>(283)</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets, end of year</td><td>$ 108,496</td><td>$ 92,283</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Funded status:</td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unfunded benefit obligation, end of year</td><td>$ (61,534)</td><td>$ (102,151)</td><td>$ (1,705)</td><td>$ (1,933)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at end of year:</td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current liability</td><td>$ (9,146)</td><td>$ (6,656)</td><td>$ (148)</td><td>$ (158)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term liability</td><td>(52,388)</td><td>(95,495)</td><td>(1,557)</td><td>(1,775)</td></tr><tr><td>Recognized liability</td><td>$ (61,534)</td><td>$ (102,151)</td><td>$ (1,705)</td><td>$ (1,933)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts recognized in accumulated other</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>comprehensive loss at end of year:</td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net actuarial loss (gain)</td><td>$ 16,957</td><td>$ 53,368</td><td>$ (126)</td><td>$ (49)</td></tr></table>

The accumulated benefit obligation for our defined benefit pension plans was $170.0 million and $194.4 million at December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, respectively. Each of our defined benefit pension plans had accumulated benefit obligations that exceeded the fair value of plan assets at December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, respectively.



## Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income)

Net pension and other postretirement costs included the following components:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="4">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 51</td><td>$ 173</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>7,954</td><td>8,272</td><td>8,213</td><td>78</td><td>96</td><td>112</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Estimated return on plan assets</td><td>(5,393)</td><td>(5,867)</td><td>(6,177)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Curtailment loss</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>16</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Settlement loss (gain)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(15)</td><td>(7)</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of net loss (gain)</td><td>1,001</td><td>465</td><td>96</td><td>—</td><td>(2)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net cost</td><td>$ 3,562</td><td>$ 2,921</td><td>$ 2,324</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 112</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

## Economic Assumptions

The weighted average assumptions used in determining pension and other postretirement plan information were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="4">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Benefit obligation:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>4.95%</td><td>4.22%</td><td>5.09%</td><td>4.95%</td><td>4.22%</td><td>5.09%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Rate of compensation increase</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>3.00%</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net pension and other postretirement cost:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>4.22%</td><td>5.09%</td><td>5.50%</td><td>4.22%</td><td>5.09%</td><td>5.50%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Rate of compensation increase</td><td>NA</td><td>3.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>6.00%</td><td>7.50%</td><td>7.75%</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

The expected rate of return on plan assets was determined based on the current interest rate environment and historical market premiums relative to the fixed income rates of equities and other asset classes. We also take into consideration anticipated asset allocations, investment strategies and the views of various investment professionals when developing this rate.

## Plan Assets

The following table reflects the pension plans’ actual asset allocations:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012(a)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—%</td><td>—%</td></tr><tr><td>Pooled separate accounts(b):</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities</td><td>8%</td><td>8%</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities</td><td>3%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>Common collective trust funds(b):</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities</td><td>60%</td><td>63%</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities</td><td>29%</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td></tr></table>

(a) We have made certain reclassifications to the December 30, 2012 asset allocation with no impact to total reported plan assets in order to conform to the December 29, 2013 presentation.

(b) Pooled separate accounts ("PSAs") and common collective trust funds ("CCTs") are two of the most common types of alternative vehicles in which benefit plans invest. These investments are pooled funds that look like mutual funds, but they are not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Often times, they will be invested in mutual funds or other marketable securities, but the unit price generally will be different from the value of the underlying securities because the fund may also hold cash for liquidity purposes, and the fees imposed by the fund are deducted from the fund value rather than charged separately to investors. Some PSAs and CCTs have no restrictions as to their investment strategy and can invest in riskier investments, such as derivatives, hedge funds, private equity funds, or similar investments.



Absent regulatory or statutory limitations, the target asset allocation for the investment of the assets for our ongoing pension plans is 30% in fixed income securities and 70% in equity securities. The plans only invest in fixed income and equity instruments for which there is a ready public market. We develop our expected long-term rate of return assumptions based on the historical rates of returns for equity and fixed income securities of the type in which our plans invest.

The fair value measurements of plan assets fell into the following levels of the fair value hierarchy as of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="8">2013</td><td colspan="7">2012(a)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Level 1(b)</td><td colspan="2">Level 2(c)</td><td colspan="2">Level 3(d)</td><td colspan="2">Total</td><td colspan="2">Level 1(b)</td><td colspan="2">Level 2(c)</td><td colspan="2">Level 3(d)</td><td colspan="2">Total</td></tr><tr><td colspan="16">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$</td><td>275</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$</td><td>275</td><td>$</td><td>72</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>Pooled separate accounts:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Large U.S. equity funds(e)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>4,828</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>4,828</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>4,181</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>4,181</td></tr><tr><td>Small/Mid U.S. equity funds(f)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>1,192</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>1,192</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>1,060</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>1,060</td></tr><tr><td>International equity funds(g)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>2,019</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>2,019</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>1,908</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>1,908</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income funds(h)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>3,442</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>3,442</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>2,693</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>2,693</td></tr><tr><td>Common collective trusts funds:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Large U.S. equity funds(e)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>28,784</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>28,784</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>32,434</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>32,434</td></tr><tr><td>Small U.S. equity funds(f)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>16,937</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>16,937</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>12,659</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>12,659</td></tr><tr><td>International equity funds(g)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>19,420</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>19,420</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>12,831</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>12,831</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income funds(h)</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td>31,599</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>31,599</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>24,445</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>24,445</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$</td><td>275</td><td>$</td><td>108,221</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td></td><td>$</td><td>108,496</td><td>$</td><td>72</td><td>$</td><td>92,211</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$</td><td>92,283</td></tr></table>

(a) We have made certain reclassifications to the December 30, 2012 fair value hierarchy with no impact to total reported plan assets in order to conform to the December 29, 2013 presentation.

(b) Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are used to determine fair value.

(c) Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and inputs that are observable for the asset are used to determine fair value.

(d) Unobservable inputs, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations, are used to determine fair value.

(e) This category is comprised of investment options that invest in stocks, or shares of ownership, in large, well-established U.S. companies. These investment options typically carry more risk than fixed income options but have the potential for higher returns over longer time periods.

(f) This category is generally comprised of investment options that invest in stocks, or shares of ownership, in small to medium-sized U.S. companies. These investment options typically carry more risk than larger U.S. equity investment options but have the potential for higher returns.

(g) This category is comprised of investment options that invest in stocks, or shares of ownership, in companies with their principal place of business or office outside of the U.S.

(h) This category is comprised of investment options that invest in bonds, or debt of a company or government entity (including U.S. and non-U.S. entities). It may also include real estate investment options that directly own property. These investment options typically carry more risk than short-term fixed income investment options (including, for real estate investment options, liquidity risk), but less overall risk than equities.

The valuation of plan assets in Level 2 is determined using a market approach based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 2 securities primarily include equity and fixed income securities funds.



## Benefit Payments

The following table reflects the benefits as of December 29, 2013 expected to be paid in each of the next five years and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter from our pension and other postretirement plans. Because our pension plans are primarily funded plans, the anticipated benefits with respect to these plans will come primarily from the trusts established for these plans. Because our other postretirement plans are unfunded, the anticipated benefits with respect to these plans will come from our own assets.

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="3">Pension</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Benefits</td><td>Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>$ 12,803</td><td>$ 148</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>12,231</td><td>151</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>11,847</td><td>153</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>11,487</td><td>154</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>10,940</td><td>153</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2019-2023</td><td>50,866</td><td>723</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 110,174</td><td>$ 1,482</td><td></td></tr></table>

We anticipate contributing $9.1 million and $0.1 million, as required by funding regulations or laws, to our pension and other postretirement plans, respectively, during 2014.

## Unrecognized Benefit Amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Income)

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that were not recognized as components of net periodic benefits cost and the changes in those amounts are as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="4">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="4">Other Benefits</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Net actuarial loss (gain), beginning of year</td><td>$ 53,368</td><td>$ 31,108</td><td>$ 9,708</td><td>$ (49)</td><td>$ (217)</td><td>$ (47)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortization</td><td>(1,001)</td><td>(465)</td><td>(96)</td><td>—</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Curtailment and settlement adjustments</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>15</td><td>7</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial loss (gain)</td><td>(24,315)</td><td>24,872</td><td>12,072</td><td>(92)</td><td>159</td><td>(170)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset loss (gain)</td><td>(11,095)</td><td>(2,147)</td><td>9,424</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net actuarial loss (gain), end of year</td><td>$ 16,957</td><td>$ 53,368</td><td>$ 31,108</td><td>$ (126)</td><td>$ (49)</td><td>$ (217)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net prior service cost, beginning of year</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 19</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortization</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(19)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net prior service cost, end of year</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

The Company expects to recognize in net pension cost throughout 2014 an actuarial loss of $0.1 million that was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 29, 2013.

## Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors two defined contribution retirement savings plans named the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Savings Plan (the “RS Plan”) and the To-Ricos Employee Savings and Retirement Plan (the “To-Ricos Plan”). The RS Plan is an IRC Section 401(k) salary deferral plan maintained for certain eligible US employees. Under the RS Plan, eligible U.S. employees may voluntarily contribute a percentage of their compensation. The Company matches up to 30.0% of the first 2.14% to 6.00% of salary based on the salary deferral and compensation levels up to $245,000. The To-Ricos Plan is an IRC Section 1165(e) salary deferral plan maintained for certain eligible Puerto Rican employees. Under the To-Ricos Plan, eligible employees may voluntarily contribute a percentage of their compensation and there are various company matching provisions. The Company also maintains three postretirement plans for eligible Mexico employees as required by Mexico law that primarily cover termination benefits.

The Company’s expenses related to its defined contribution plans totaled $3.9 million, $5.7 million and $5.5 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Certain retirement plans that the Company sponsors invest in a variety of financial instruments. Certain postretirement funds in which the Company participates hold significant amounts of mortgage-backed securities. However, none of the mortgages collateralizing these securities are considered subprime.



## 13. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

## Rights Offering

In January 2012, Pilgrim's commenced the Rights Offering for stockholders of record as of January 17, 2012 (the "Record Date"). The basic subscription privilege gave stockholders the option to purchase 0.2072 shares of Pilgrim's common stock, rounded up to the next largest whole number, at a subscription price of $4.50 per share for each share of Pilgrim's common stock they owned as of the Record Date. The multiplier was determined by dividing the 44,444,444 shares being offered in the Rights Offering by the total number of shares owned by all stockholders on the Record Date. Those stockholders that exercised their basic subscription privilege in full also received an over-subscription privilege that afforded them the opportunity to purchase additional shares at the subscription price of $4.50 per share from a pool of the shares left over had all stockholders not elected to exercise their basic subscription privileges in full. JBS USA committed to participate in the Rights Offering and exercise its basic and over-subscription privileges in full. The last day a stockholder could exercise either their basic subscription rights or their over-subscription rights was February 29, 2012. On March 7, 2012, the Company issued 44,444,444 shares of common stock to stockholders that exercised their basic subscription privileges and over-subscription privileges under the Rights Offering. Gross proceeds received under the Rights Offering totaled $200.0 million. The Company incurred costs directly attributable to the Rights Offering of $1.7 million that it deferred and charged against the proceeds of the Rights Offering in Additional Paid-in Capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company used the net proceeds of $198.3 million for additional working capital to improve its capital position and for general corporate purposes. Pilgrim's also used a portion of the net proceeds to repay the outstanding principal amount of $50.0 million, plus accrued interest, of its subordinated debt owed to JBS USA and to repay indebtedness under the U.S. Credit Facility.

The Rights Offering contained a subscription price that was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock on the last day the rights could be exercised. This price discount is considered a bonus element similar to a stock dividend. Because of this bonus element, the Company adjusted both the weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding as reported in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2011 by multiplying those weighted average shares by an adjustment factor that represented the $6.40 fair value of a share of the Company's common stock immediately prior to the exercise of the basic and over-subscription privileges under the Rights Offering divided by the $6.07 theoretical ex-rights fair value of a share of the Company's common stock immediately prior to the exercise of the basic and over-subscription privileges under the Rights Offering. Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding and net loss per weighted average basic and diluted share for 2011 as originally reported and as adjusted for this bonus element were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">As Originally Reported</td><td colspan="2">As Adjusted</td><td>Effect of Change</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(In thousands, except per share data)</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average basic shares outstanding</td><td></td><td>214,282</td><td>224,996</td><td></td><td>10,714</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average diluted shares outstanding</td><td></td><td>214,282</td><td>224,996</td><td></td><td>10.714</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss per weighted average basic share</td><td>$</td><td>(2.32)</td><td>$</td><td>(2.21)</td><td>$ 0.11</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss per weighted average diluted share</td><td>$</td><td>(2.32)</td><td>$</td><td>(2.21)</td><td>$ 0.11</td></tr></table>

## Restrictions on Retained Earnings

Both The U.S. Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 2018 Notes restrict, but do not prohibit, the Company from declaring dividends.

## Antidilutive Common Stock Equivalents

Due to the net loss incurred during 2011, the Company did not include 12,094 common stock equivalents in the calculation of the denominator used for net loss per weighted average diluted common share outstanding as these common stock equivalents would have been antidilutive.



## Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following tables provide information regarding the changes accumulated other comprehensive loss during 2013 and 2012:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td></tr><tr><td>Losses Related to Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits</td><td>Unrealized Holding Gains on Available-for-Sale Securities</td><td>Total</td><td>Losses Related to Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance, beginning of year</td><td>$ (68,511)</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (68,511)</td><td>$ (46,070)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications</td><td>21,713</td><td>62</td><td>21,775</td><td>(22,886)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income</td><td>1,001</td><td>—</td><td>1,001</td><td>445</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net current year other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>22,714</td><td>62</td><td>22,776</td><td>(22,441)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance, end of year</td><td>$ (45,797)</td><td>$ 62</td><td>(45,735)</td><td>$ (68,511)</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) All amounts are net of tax. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components</td><td colspan="2">Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(a)</td><td rowspan="2">Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Realized gain on sale of securities</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 18</td><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of pension and other postretirement plan actuarial losses:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Union employees pension plan(b)</td><td>(36)</td><td>$ (64) (d)</td><td>Cost of goods sold</td></tr><tr><td>Legacy Gold Kist plans(c)</td><td>(965)</td><td>(399) (d)</td><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td></tr><tr><td>Total before tax</td><td>(1,001)</td><td>(445)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefit (expense)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total reclassification for the period</td><td>$ (1,001)</td><td>$ (445)</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) Amounts in parentheses represent debits to results of operations.

(b) The Company sponsors the Union Plan, a qualified defined benefit pension plan covering certain locations or work groups with collective bargaining agreements.

(c) The Company sponsors the GK Pension Plan, a qualified defined benefit pension plan covering certain eligible U.S. employees who were employed at locations that the Company purchased through its acquisition of Gold Kist in 2007, the SERP Plan, a nonqualified defined benefit retirement plan covering certain former Gold Kist executives, the Directors' Emeriti Plan, a nonqualified defined benefit retirement plan covering certain former Gold Kist directors and the Retiree Life Plan, a defined benefit postretirement life insurance plan covering certain retired Gold Kist employees (collectively, the "Legacy Gold Kist Plans").

(d) These accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See “Note 12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

## 14. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

The Company sponsors a short-term incentive plan that provides the grant of either cash or share-based bonus awards payable upon achievement of specified performance goals (the “STIP”). Full-time, salaried exempt employees of the Company and its affiliates who are selected by the administering committee are eligible to participate in the STIP. The Company has accrued $25.8 million in costs related to the STIP at December 29, 2013 related to cash bonus awards that could potentially be awarded during 2014.

The Company also sponsors a performance-based, omnibus long-term incentive plan that provides for the grant of a broad range of long-term equity-based and cash-based awards to the Company’s officers and other employees, members of the Board and any consultants (the “LTIP”). The equity-based awards that may be granted under the LTIP include “incentive stock options,” within the meaning of the IRC, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). At December 29, 2013, we have reserved approximately 6.6 million shares of common stock for future issuance under the LTIP.



## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following awards existed during 2013:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Award Type</td><td rowspan="2">Benefit Plan</td><td colspan="2">Award</td><td colspan="2">Vesting</td><td colspan="2">Estimated</td></tr><tr><td>Quantity</td><td>Grant Date</td><td>Condition</td><td>Vesting Date</td><td>Forfeiture Rate</td><td>Settlement Method</td></tr><tr><td>RSA</td><td>Employment Agreement</td><td>100,000</td><td>January 14, 2011</td><td>Service</td><td>January 3, 2013</td><td>—%</td><td>Stock</td></tr><tr><td>RSA</td><td>Employment Agreement</td><td>100,000</td><td>January 14, 2011</td><td>Service</td><td>January 3, 2014</td><td>—%</td><td>Stock</td></tr><tr><td>RSA</td><td>LTIP</td><td>72,675</td><td>August 27, 2012</td><td>Service</td><td>April 27, 2014</td><td>—%</td><td>Stock</td></tr><tr><td>RSU</td><td>LTIP</td><td>608,561</td><td>February 4, 2013</td><td>Service</td><td>December 31, 2014</td><td>9.6559%</td><td>Stock</td></tr><tr><td>RSA</td><td>LTIP</td><td>15,000</td><td>February 25, 2013</td><td>Service</td><td>February 24, 2015</td><td>—%</td><td>Stock</td></tr><tr><td>RSA</td><td>LTIP</td><td>15,000</td><td>February 25, 2013</td><td>Service</td><td>February 24, 2016</td><td>—%</td><td>Stock</td></tr><tr><td>RSU</td><td>LTIP</td><td>206,933</td><td>February 26, 2013</td><td>Service</td><td>December 31, 2014</td><td>—%</td><td>Stock</td></tr></table>

The fair value of each RSA and RSU granted represents the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the respective grant date.

Compensation costs and the income tax benefit recognized for our share-based compensation arrangements are included below:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Share-based compensation cost:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cost of goods sold</td><td>$ 361</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>2,984</td><td>684</td><td>568</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 3,345</td><td>$ 684</td><td>$ 568</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax benefit</td><td>$ 471</td><td>$ 28</td><td>$ —</td></tr></table>

The Company’s RSA and RSU activity is included below:

<table><tr><td rowspan="3"></td><td colspan="3">2013</td><td colspan="3">2012</td><td colspan="3">2011</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value</td><td colspan="3">Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value</td><td colspan="3">WeightED Average Grant Date Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Number</td><td>Number</td><td>Number</td><td>Number</td><td>Number</td><td>Number</td><td>Number</td><td>Date Fair Value</td><td>Date Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>RSA:s:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding at beginning of year</td><td>273</td><td>$ 6.54</td><td>200</td><td>$ 7.10</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>30</td><td>8.72</td><td>73</td><td>5.00</td><td>200</td><td>7.10</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vested</td><td>(100)</td><td>7.10</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding at end of year</td><td>203</td><td>$ 6.59</td><td>273</td><td>$ 6.54</td><td>200</td><td>$ 7.10</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RSU:s:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding at beginning of year</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>815</td><td>8.82</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vested</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Forfeited</td><td>(86)</td><td>8.89</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding at end of year</td><td>729</td><td>$ 8.81</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

The total fair value of shares vested in 2013 was $710 thousand. No shares vested in 2012 or 2011.

At December 29, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to all nonvested awards was $4.5 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.03 years.

Historically, we have issued new shares to satisfy award conversions.



## 15. EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

From time to time, the Company will incur costs to implement exit or disposal efforts for specific operations. These exit or disposal plans, each of which is approved by the Company's Board of Directors, focus on various aspects of operations, including closing and consolidating certain processing facilities, rationalizing headcount and aligning operations in the most strategic and cost-efficient structure. Specific exit or disposal efforts that were ongoing during 2013, 2012 and 2011 included the following:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">JBS USA</td></tr><tr><td>Facility Closures(a)</td><td>Integration(b)</td><td>Total</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except positions eliminated)</td></tr><tr><td>Earliest implementation date</td><td colspan="2">October 2008</td><td colspan="2">January 2010</td></tr><tr><td>Latest expected completion date</td><td colspan="2">September 2014</td><td colspan="2">September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Positions eliminated</td><td colspan="2">2,410</td><td>480</td><td>2,890</td></tr><tr><td>Costs incurred and expected to be incurred:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Employee-related costs</td><td>$ 2,492</td><td>$ 32,311</td><td>$ 34,803</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset impairment costs</td><td colspan="2">25,018</td><td>38,514</td><td>63,532</td></tr><tr><td>Inventory valuation costs</td><td colspan="2">344</td><td>—</td><td>344</td></tr><tr><td>Other exit or disposal costs</td><td colspan="2">15,207</td><td>11,336</td><td>26,543</td></tr><tr><td>Total exit or disposal costs</td><td>$ 43,061</td><td>$ 82,161</td><td>$ 125,222</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Costs incurred since earliest implementation date:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Employee-related costs</td><td>$ 2,492</td><td>$ 32,311</td><td>$ 34,803</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset impairment costs</td><td colspan="2">25,018</td><td>38,514</td><td>63,532</td></tr><tr><td>Inventory valuation costs</td><td colspan="2">344</td><td>—</td><td>344</td></tr><tr><td>Other exit or disposal costs</td><td colspan="2">14,241</td><td>11,336</td><td>25,577</td></tr><tr><td>Total exit or disposal costs</td><td>$ 42,095</td><td>$ 82,161</td><td>$ 124,256</td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">2013</td><td colspan="3">2012</td><td colspan="3">2011</td></tr><tr><td>Facility Closures(a)</td><td>JBS USA Integration(b)</td><td>Total</td><td>Facility Closures(a)</td><td>JBS USA Integration(b)</td><td>Total</td><td>Faculty Closures(a)</td><td>JBS USA Integration(b)</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Employee-related costs</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 65</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 65</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 405</td><td>$ 1,052</td></tr><tr><td>Asset impairment costs</td><td>3,177</td><td>466</td><td>3,643</td><td>3,868</td><td>(1,098)</td><td>2,770</td><td>9,203</td><td>13,693</td><td>22,896</td></tr><tr><td>Inventory valuation costs</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>151</td><td>—</td><td>151</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other exit or disposal costs</td><td>2,018</td><td>—</td><td>2,018</td><td>3,685</td><td>1,994</td><td>5,679</td><td>5,249</td><td>—</td><td>5,249</td></tr><tr><td>Total exit or disposal costs</td><td>$ 5,195</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 5,661</td><td>$ 7,769</td><td>$ 896</td><td>$ 8,665</td><td>$ 15,099</td><td>$ 14,098</td><td>$ 29,197</td></tr></table>

(a) Significant facilities closed included one processing plant in 2008, two processing plants in 2009, two processing plants in the transition period and one processing plant in 2011. The transition period began September 27, 2009 and ended December 27, 2009 and resulted from the Company's change in its fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest September 30 each year to the last Sunday in December of each year.

(b) Company management implemented certain activities to integrate the administrative functions of the Company into those of JBS USA. These included the closures of administrative offices in Georgia and Texas.



Accrued severance costs are included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and accrued inventory charges are included in Inventories on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table sets forth activity that was recorded through the Company’s accrued exit or disposal cost accounts during 2013 and 2012:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Accrued Severance</td><td>Inventory Reserves (In thousands)</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>December 25, 2011</td><td>$ 90</td><td>$ 793</td><td>$ 883</td></tr><tr><td>Accruals</td><td>65</td><td>151</td><td>216</td></tr><tr><td>Payment/Disposal</td><td>(155)</td><td>(136)</td><td>(291)</td></tr><tr><td>December 30, 2012</td><td>—</td><td>808</td><td>808</td></tr><tr><td>Accruals</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Payment/Disposal</td><td>—</td><td>(808)</td><td>(808)</td></tr><tr><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr></table>

Exit or disposal costs were included on the following lines in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Operational restructuring charges</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,958</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges</td><td>5,661</td><td>8,449</td><td>26,911</td></tr><tr><td>Total exit or disposal costs</td><td>$ 5,661</td><td>$ 8,665</td><td>$ 29,197</td></tr></table>

Certain exit and disposal costs were classified as either Operational restructuring charges, net or Administrative restructuring charges, net on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations because management believed these costs were not directly related to the Company's ongoing operations. Components of operational restructuring charges and administrative restructuring charges are summarized below:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Operational restructuring charges:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Relocation charges expensed as incurred</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Asset impairments (See “Note 8. Property, Plant and Equipment”)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,958</td></tr><tr><td>Loss on egg sales and flock depletion expensed as incurred</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1,958</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Severance charges</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 724</td></tr><tr><td>Relocation charges expensed as incurred</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Asset impairments (See “Note 8. Property, Plant and Equipment”)</td><td>3,643</td><td>2,770</td><td>20,938</td></tr><tr><td>Loss on scrapped inventory expensed as incurred</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Loss on egg sales and flock depletion expensed as incurred</td><td>—</td><td>509</td><td>2,390</td></tr><tr><td>Other restructuring costs</td><td>2,018</td><td>5,170</td><td>2,859</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 5,661</td><td>$ 8,449</td><td>$ 26,911</td></tr></table>

We continue to review and evaluate various restructuring and other alternatives to streamline our operations, improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Such initiatives may include selling assets, consolidating operations and functions and voluntary and involuntary employee separation programs. Any such actions may require us to obtain the pre-approval of our lenders under our credit facilities. In addition, such actions will subject the Company to additional short-term costs, which may include asset impairment charges, lease commitment costs, employee retention and severance costs and other costs. Certain of these activities may have a disproportionate impact on our income relative to the cost savings in a particular period.



## 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Pilgrim’s has been and, in some cases, continues to be a party to certain transactions with affiliated persons and our current and former directors and executive officers. Company management has analyzed the terms of all contracts executed with related parties and believes that they are substantially similar to, and contain terms no less favorable to us than, those obtainable from unaffiliated parties.

On December 28, 2009, JBS USA became the holder of the majority of the common stock of the Company. Until March 26, 2012, Lonnie A. “Bo” Pilgrim (the “Founder Director”) and certain entities related to the Founder Director collectively owned the second-largest block of our common stock. On March 12, 2012, the Founder Director resigned as a director of Pilgrim's. On March 26, 2012, the Founder Director and certain entities related to the Founder Director sold 18,924,438 shares of our common stock to JBS USA.

Transactions with JBS USA, JBS USA, LLC (a JBS USA subsidiary) and the former Founder Director recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations are summarized below:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>JBS USA, LLC:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Purchases from JBS USA, LLC</td><td>$ 80,809</td><td>$ 69,048</td><td>$ 173,081</td></tr><tr><td>Expenditures paid by JBS USA, LLC on behalf of Pilgrim’s \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>55,730</td><td>61,353</td><td>26,331</td></tr><tr><td>Sales to JBS USA, LLC</td><td>61,942</td><td>206,720</td><td>117,909</td></tr><tr><td>Expenditures paid by Pilgrim’s on behalf of JBS USA, LLC \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>1,733</td><td>4,134</td><td>1,312</td></tr><tr><td>Sale of PFS Distribution business assets to JBS USA, LLC \( ^{(c)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>24,479</td></tr><tr><td>Sale of pork business assets to JBS USA, LLC \( ^{(d)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>13,000</td></tr><tr><td>Founder Director:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Contract grower pay paid to Founder Director</td><td>—</td><td>297</td><td>1,132</td></tr><tr><td>Consulting fee paid to Founder Director \( ^{(b)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>374</td><td>1,497</td></tr><tr><td>Board fees paid to Founder Director \( ^{(b)} \)</td><td>—</td><td>45</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>Sales to Founder Director</td><td>—</td><td>1</td><td>22</td></tr></table>

(a) On January 19, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with JBS USA, LLC in order to allocate costs associated with JBS USA, LLC's procurement of SAP licenses and maintenance services for its combined companies. Under this agreement, the fees associated with procuring SAP licenses and maintenance services are allocated between the Company and JBS USA, LLC in proportion to the percentage of licenses used by each company. The agreement expires on the date of expiration, or earlier termination, of the underlying SAP license agreement. On May 5, 2010, the Company also entered into an agreement with JBS USA, LLC in order to allocate the costs of supporting the business operations by one consolidated corporate team, which have historically been supported by their respective corporate teams. Expenditures paid by JBS USA, LLC on behalf of the Company will be reimbursed by the Company and expenditures paid by the Company on behalf of JBS USA, LLC will be reimbursed by JBS USA, LLC. This agreement expires on May 5, 2015.

(b) In connection with the Company's plan of reorganization, the Company and the Founder Director entered into a consulting agreement, which became effective on December 28, 2009. The terms of the consulting agreement included, among other things, that the Founder Director (i) provide services to the Company that are comparable in the aggregate with the services provided by him to the Company prior to December 28, 2009, (ii) be appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company and during the term of the consulting agreement will be nominated for subsequent terms on the board, (iii) be compensated for services rendered to the Company at a rate of $1.5 million per year for a term of five years, (iv) be subject to customary non-solicitation and non-competition provisions and (v) be, along with his spouse, provided with medical benefits (or will be compensated for medical coverage) that are comparable in the aggregate to the medical benefits afforded to employees of the Company.

(c) On October 7, 2011, the Company and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries entered into an agreement with JBS USA, LLC and JBS Trading International, Inc. to sell certain real property, tractor trailers, inventory, equipment, accounts receivable and other assets related to our distribution and transportation businesses. See below for additional information regarding this sale.

(d) On October 26, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Swift Pork Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of JBS USA, LLC, to sell certain real property, tractor trailers, inventory, livestock, equipment, accounts receivable and other assets related to our pork business.

As of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, the outstanding payable to JBS USA was $3.9 million and $13.4 million, respectively. As of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, the outstanding receivable from JBS USA, LLC was $2.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. As of December 29, 2013, approximately $2.1 million of goods from JBS USA, LLC were in transit and not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On March 2, 2011, the Company agreed to purchase the home of William W. Lovette in Arkansas on reasonable and customary commercial terms and at a purchase price not to exceed approximately $2.1 million. Consequently, Mr. Lovette transferred all of the rights and the Company assumed all obligations relative to the property for a purchase price of $2.1 million. His home was sold on July 23, 2012.

On October 7, 2011, the Company and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries entered into an agreement with JBS USA, LLC and JBS Trading International, Inc. to sell certain real property, tractor trailers, inventory, equipment, accounts receivable and other assets related to our distribution and transportation businesses. The purchase price for these assets was $24.5 million, paid in cash, and the transaction closed on November 18, 2011. Company management analyzed the terms of the contract and believe that they were substantially similar to and contain terms no less favorable to us than those obtainable from unaffiliated parties. Additionally, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors reviewed and approved the agreement.



On October 26, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Swift Pork Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of JBS USA, LLC to sell certain real property, tractor trailers, inventory, livestock, equipment, accounts receivable and other assets related to our pork business. The purchase price for these assets was $13.0 million, payable in cash, subject to adjustment based on the final accounting of the assets. The closing occurred on December 2, 2011. Company management analyzed the terms of the contract and believe that they were substantially similar to and contain terms no less favorable to us than those obtainable from unaffiliated parties. Additionally, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors reviewed and approved the agreement.

## 17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

## General

We are a party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. Among other considerations, we have not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities as based upon the likelihood of payment, the fair value of such indemnities would not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

## Purchase Obligations

The Company will sometimes enter into noncancelable contracts to purchase capital equipment and certain commodities such as corn, soybean meal, electricity and natural gas. At December 29, 2013, the Company was party to outstanding purchase contracts totaling $150.6 million, $4.8 million, $4.7 million and $0.8 million payable in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

## Operating Leases

The Consolidated Statements of Operations include rental expense for operating leases of approximately $9.6 million, $14.3 million and $26.2 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company’s future minimum lease commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

<table><tr><td>2014</td><td>$ 7,621</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>6,599</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>3,931</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>2,154</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>816</td></tr><tr><td>Thereafter</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 21,139</td></tr></table>

Certain of the Company’s operating leases include rent escalations. The Company includes the rent escalation in its minimum lease payments obligations and recognizes them as a component of rental expense on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term.

The Company also maintains operating leases for various types of equipment, some of which contain residual value guarantees for the market value of assets at the end of the term of the lease. The terms of the lease maturities range from one to ten years. The maximum potential amount of the residual value guarantees is estimated to be approximately $2.6 million; however, the actual amount would be offset by any recoverable amount based on the fair market value of the underlying leased assets. No liability has been recorded related to this contingency as the likelihood of payments under these guarantees is not considered to be probable and the fair value of such guarantees is immaterial. The Company historically has not experienced significant payments under similar residual guarantees.



## Financial Instruments

Pursuant to the terms of the Subordinated Loan Agreement, we have agreed to reimburse JBS USA up to $56.5 million for draws upon any letters of credit issued for JBS USA's account that support certain obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The Company’s loan agreements generally obligate the Company to reimburse the applicable lender for incremental increased costs due to a change in law that imposes (i) any reserve or special deposit requirement against assets of, deposits with or credit extended by such lender related to the loan, (ii) any tax, duty or other charge with respect to the loan (except standard income tax) or (iii) capital adequacy requirements. In addition, some of the Company’s loan agreements contain a withholding tax provision that requires the Company to pay additional amounts to the applicable lender or other financing party, generally if withholding taxes are imposed on such lender or other financing party as a result of a change in the applicable tax law. These increased cost and withholding tax provisions continue for the entire term of the applicable transaction, and there is no limitation on the maximum additional amounts the Company could be obligated to pay under such provisions. Any failure to pay amounts due under such provisions generally would trigger an event of default, and, in a secured financing transaction, would entitle the lender to foreclose upon the collateral to realize the amount due.

## Litigation

We are a party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. Among other considerations, we have not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities as based upon the likelihood of payment, the fair value of such indemnities would not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. In the Company’s opinion, it has made appropriate and adequate accruals for claims where necessary; however, the ultimate liability for these matters is uncertain, and if significantly different than the amounts accrued, the ultimate outcome could have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. For a discussion of the material legal proceedings and claims, see Part II, Item 1. “Legal Proceedings.” Below is a summary of some of these material proceedings and claims. The Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims made and intends to vigorously defend these cases.

On December 1, 2008, Pilgrim’s and six of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division (“Bankruptcy Court”). The cases were jointly administered under Case No. 08-45664. The Company emerged from Chapter 11 on December 28, 2009. The Company is the named defendant in several pre-petition lawsuits that, as of December 29, 2013, have not been resolved. Among the claims presently pending are claims brought against certain current and former directors, executive officers and employees of the Company, the Pilgrim’s Pride Administrative Committee and the Pilgrim’s Pride Pension Committee seeking unspecified damages under section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. These claims were brought by individual participants in the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Savings Plan, individually and on behalf of a putative class, alleging that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to plan participants and beneficiaries or otherwise violated ERISA. Although the Company is not a named defendant in these claims, our bylaws require us to indemnify our current and former directors and officers from any liabilities and expenses incurred by them in connection with actions they took in good faith while serving as an officer or director. In these actions the plaintiffs assert claims in excess of $35.0 million. The likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the amount or range of any possible loss to the Company cannot be determined at this time.



Other claims presently pending against the Company are claims seeking unspecified damages brought by current or former contract chicken growers who allege, along with other assertions, that the Company breached grower contracts and made false representations to induce the plaintiffs into building chicken farms and entering into chicken growing agreements with the Company. In the case styled Shelia Adams, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, on September 30, 2011, the trial court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law stating that the Company violated section 192(e) of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 by purportedly attempting to manipulate the price of chicken by idling the El Dorado, Arkansas complex and rejecting the El Dorado growers’ contracts. The trial court awarded damages in the amount of $25.8 million. Afterward, the Company filed post-judgment motions attacking the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, which, on December 28, 2011, were granted in part and resulted in a reduction of the damages award from $25.8 million to $25.6 million. On January 19, 2012, the Company appealed the findings of fact and conclusions of law and decision concerning the post-judgment motions to the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral argument occurred December 3, 2012. On August 27, 2013, the Fifth Circuit reversed the judgment, and entered a judgment in favor of the Company. Plaintiffs thereafter filed a petition for rehearing en banc. Plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing was denied on October 15, 2013. On January 13, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari requesting the Supreme Court of the United States to accept their case for review. The Company is awaiting a ruling from the Supreme Court on whether it will accept the case for review. If such petition is granted, the Company intends to vigorously pursue its appellate rights and defend against reinstatement of the underlying judgment of the trial court. The Fifth Circuit’s decision and prior favorable trial court rulings regarding the El Dorado grower’ claims suggest that the likelihood of any recovery by growers remaining in the case is too remote to maintain the previously-recorded loss accrual. Therefore, the Company reversed the accrual on September 1, 2013. The remaining growers’ claims were scheduled for trial during the summer and fall of 2012. Although the trial associated with the growers’ claims from the Farmerville, Louisiana complex was completed without a ruling, the trial associated with the growers’ claims from the Nacogdoches, Texas complex have not been completed and the trial court has not scheduled a date for resuming the trial, and the trials associated with the growers’ claims from the De Queen and Batesville, Arkansas complexes have been indefinitely postponed by court order. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims. Although the likelihood of financial loss related to the remaining growers’ claims is reasonably possible, an estimate of potential loss cannot be determined at this time because of now conflicting legal authority, the factual nature of the various growers’ individual claims and a new judge who will preside over the remaining bench trials. There can be no assurances that other similar claims may not be brought against the Company.

The United States Department of Treasury, IRS filed an amended proof of claim in the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to which the IRS asserted claims that total $74.7 million. We filed in the Bankruptcy Court (i) an objection to the IRS’ amended proof of claim, and (ii) a motion requesting the Bankruptcy Court to determine our U.S. federal tax liability pursuant to Sections 105 and 505 of the Bankruptcy Code. The objection and motion asserted that the Company had no liability for the additional U.S. federal taxes that have been asserted for pre-petition periods by the IRS. The IRS responded in opposition to our objection and motion. On July 8, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court granted our unopposed motion requesting that the Bankruptcy Court abstain from determining our federal tax liability. As a result we have worked with the IRS through the normal processes and procedures that are available to all taxpayers outside of bankruptcy (including the Tax Court proceedings discussed below) to resolve the IRS’ amended proof of claim. On December 13, 2012, we entered into two Stipulations with the IRS. The first Stipulation relates to the Company’s 2003, 2005, and 2007 tax years and resolves all of the material issues in the case. The second Stipulation relates to the Company as the successor in interest to Gold Kist for the tax years ended June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005, and resolves all substantive issues in the case. These Stipulations account for approximately $29.3 million of the amended proof of claim and should result in no additional tax due.

In connection with the amended proof of claim, on May 26, 2010, we filed a petition in Tax Court in response to a Notice of Deficiency that was issued to the Company as the successor in interest to Gold Kist. The Notice of Deficiency and the Tax Court proceeding relate to a loss that Gold Kist claimed for its tax year ended June 30, 2004. On December 11, 2013, the Tax Court issued its opinion in the Tax Court Case holding the loss that Gold Kist claimed for its tax year ended June 30, 2004 is capital in nature. On January 10, 2014, PPC filed both a Motion for Reconsideration and a Motion for Full Tax Court review of both its Motion for Reconsideration and any order issued in response to such motion. On January 15, 2014, the Tax Court issued an order requesting the IRS to respond to PPC’s Motion for Reconsideration on or before February 18, 2014. The Company intends to vigorously pursue its appellate rights. This proceeding accounts for approximately $45.4 million of the amended proof of claim.

Upon the initial filing of the Gold Kist tax return for the year ended June 30, 2004, the Company assessed the likelihood that the position related to the proceeding would be sustained upon examination and determined that it met the recognition threshold and the full amount of benefit was recognized. We continue to believe the position is more likely than not of being sustained. If adversely determined, the outcome could have a material effect on the Company’s operating results and financial position.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) investigated allegations of identity theft within our workforce. With our cooperation, ICE arrested approximately 350 of our employees in 2008 believed to have engaged in identity theft at five of our facilities. On December 30, 2009, PPC, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas, and the Dallas Office of ICE entered into a non-prosecution agreement and civil resolution of the government’s investigation. Under this agreement: (i) the government agreed not to proceed either criminally or civilly against PPC, and to end its investigation of the immigration-related matters, relating to both the company and its current and former officers, employees and directors; (ii) PPC agreed to an immigration compliance program that would remain in effect for at least the 5-year term of the agreement; and (iii) PPC will pay an aggregate of $4.5 million, which approximates the amount the Company had previously accrued for this matter, to the government in four annual installments. We paid the first three installments of $1.1 million in 2010, 2011 and 2012. We also paid the final installment in 2013. The parties acknowledged that PPC was admitting to no civil liability or criminal culpability as a result of the settlement. However, no assurances can be given that further enforcement efforts by governmental authorities against our employees or the Company (i) will not disrupt a portion of our workforce or our operations at one or more of our facilities, thereby negatively impacting our business or (ii) result in the assessment of fines against us that could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



## 18. MARKET RISKS AND CONCENTRATIONS

The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, investment securities and trade accounts receivable. The Company’s cash equivalents and investment securities are high-quality debt and equity securities placed with major banks and financial institutions. The Company’s trade accounts receivable are generally unsecured. Credit evaluations are performed on all significant customers and updated as circumstances dictate. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across geographic areas. With the exception of one customer that accounts for approximately 13.0% of trade accounts and other receivables at December 29, 2013, and approximately 9.7% of net sales for 2013, the Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of credit risk in its trade accounts receivable.

At December 29, 2013, approximately 35.3% of the Company’s employees were covered under collective bargaining agreements. Substantially all employees covered under collective bargaining agreements are covered under agreements that expire in 2015 or 2016 with the exception of one live operations location where the collective bargaining agreement expired in 2013 and negotiations are ongoing. We have not experienced any labor-related work stoppage at any location in over nine years. We believe our relationship with our employees and union leadership is satisfactory. The Company is currently in negotiations at one location, and there is no assurance that agreement will be reached. In the absence of an agreement, we may become subject to labor disruption at this location, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

The aggregate carrying amount of net assets belonging to our Mexico operations was $359.0 million and $277.0 million at December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, respectively.

## 19. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC REPORTING

We operate in one reportable business segment, as a producer and seller of chicken products we either produce or purchase for resale in the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico. We conduct separate operations in the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico; however, for geographic reporting purposes, we include Puerto Rico with our U.S. operations. Corporate expenses are allocated to Mexico based upon various apportionment methods for specific expenditures incurred related thereto with the remaining amounts allocated to the U.S.

During 2011, we announced organizational changes that resulted in the merger of our former Other Products segment into our Chicken segment. Data related to our former Other Products segment, which included primarily non-chicken products sold through our distribution centers, table eggs, animal feed and offal, is no longer reported directly to the chief operating decision maker. This information is now reported through chicken operations management. We reclassified prior year segment disclosures to conform to the new segment presentation.

Net sales to customers by customer location and long-lived assets are as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td rowspan="2">2011</td></tr><tr></tr><tr><td>Net sales to customers by customer location:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 6,816,246</td><td>$ 6,600,206</td><td>$ 6,108,797</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>1,108,308</td><td>988,712</td><td>827,186</td></tr><tr><td>Asia</td><td>301,545</td><td>262,455</td><td>353,368</td></tr><tr><td>Europe</td><td>73,349</td><td>79,101</td><td>82,261</td></tr><tr><td>North America</td><td>51,275</td><td>111,305</td><td>88,900</td></tr><tr><td>Africa</td><td>38,809</td><td>62,642</td><td>56,741</td></tr><tr><td>South America</td><td>19,224</td><td>13,775</td><td>14,224</td></tr><tr><td>Pacific</td><td>2,392</td><td>3,186</td><td>4,221</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 7,535,698</td></tr></table>



<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>December 29, 2013</td><td>December 30, 2012</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Long-lived assets \( ^{(a)} \) :</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>United States</td><td>$ 1,066,963</td><td>$ 1,106,482</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>84,848</td><td>83,439</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 1,151,811</td><td>$ 1,189,921</td></tr></table>

(a) For this disclosure, we exclude financial instruments, deferred tax assets and intangible assets in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-41, Segment Reporting. Long-lived assets, as used in ASC 280-10-50-41, implies hard assets that cannot be readily removed.

The following table sets forth, for the periods beginning with 2011, net sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and markets served with those products. We based the table on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">(In thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. chicken:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Prepared chicken</td><td>$ 2,046,747</td><td>$ 2,239,289</td><td>$ 2,135,337</td></tr><tr><td>Fresh chicken</td><td>4,123,087</td><td>3,583,854</td><td>3,160,429</td></tr><tr><td>Export and other chicken by-products</td><td>715,970</td><td>817,723</td><td>808,038</td></tr><tr><td>Total U.S. chicken</td><td>6,885,804</td><td>6,640,866</td><td>6,103,804</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico chicken</td><td>864,454</td><td>758,023</td><td>720,333</td></tr><tr><td>Total chicken</td><td>7,750,258</td><td>7,398,889</td><td>6,824,137</td></tr><tr><td>Other products:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U.S.</td><td>614,409</td><td>608,619</td><td>674,923</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico</td><td>46,481</td><td>113,874</td><td>36,638</td></tr><tr><td>Total other products</td><td>660,890</td><td>722,493</td><td>711,561</td></tr><tr><td>Total net sales</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td><td>$ 7,535,698</td></tr></table>

## 20. SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

On December 15, 2010, the Company closed on the sale of the 2018 Notes. The 2018 Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Pilgrim's Pride Corporation of West Virginia, Inc., a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Guarantor"). In accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, the following condensed consolidating financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company (referred to as "Parent" for the purpose of this note only) on a Parent-only basis, the Guarantor on a Guarantor-only basis, the combined non-Guarantor subsidiaries and elimination entries necessary to arrive at the information for the Parent, the Guarantor and non-Guarantor subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the Company using the equity method for this presentation.

The tables below present the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012 as well as the condensed consolidating statements of operations, condensed consolidating statements of comprehensive income (loss) and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011 based on the guarantor structure.



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
December 29, 2013

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 413,092</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 95,114</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 508,206</td></tr><tr><td>Restricted cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Investment in available-for-sale securities</td><td>96,902</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>96,902</td></tr><tr><td>Trade accounts and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>327,367</td><td>1,380</td><td>47,931</td><td>—</td><td>376,678</td></tr><tr><td>Account receivable from JBS USA, LLC</td><td>2,388</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>2,388</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td>696,604</td><td>20,215</td><td>92,013</td><td>—</td><td>808,832</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes receivable</td><td>52,662</td><td>—</td><td>12,793</td><td>(587)</td><td>64,868</td></tr><tr><td>Current deferred tax assets</td><td>3,213</td><td>5,698</td><td>506</td><td>(7,190)</td><td>2,227</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets</td><td>34,881</td><td>270</td><td>26,697</td><td>—</td><td>61,848</td></tr><tr><td>Assets held for sale</td><td>6,798</td><td>—</td><td>235</td><td>—</td><td>7,033</td></tr><tr><td>Total current assets</td><td>1,633,907</td><td>27,563</td><td>275,289</td><td>(7,777)</td><td>1,928,982</td></tr><tr><td>Intercompany receivable</td><td>(64,772)</td><td>114,707</td><td>—</td><td>(49,935)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Investment in subsidiaries</td><td>472,431</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(472,431)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax assets</td><td>5,995</td><td>—</td><td>18,924</td><td>(5,998)</td><td>18,921</td></tr><tr><td>Other long-lived assets</td><td>37,282</td><td>—</td><td>182,881</td><td>(180,000)</td><td>40,163</td></tr><tr><td>Identified intangible assets, net</td><td>23,463</td><td>—</td><td>9,062</td><td>—</td><td>32,525</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, net</td><td>1,009,711</td><td>44,643</td><td>102,221</td><td>(4,764)</td><td>1,151,811</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$ 3,118,017</td><td>$ 186,913</td><td>$ 588,377</td><td>$ (720,905)</td><td>$ 3,172,402</td></tr><tr><td>Current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>$ 410,234</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 410,234</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable</td><td>308,154</td><td>12,711</td><td>49,495</td><td>—</td><td>370,360</td></tr><tr><td>Account payable to JBS USA, LLC</td><td>3,934</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3,934</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses and other current liabilities</td><td>269,062</td><td>33,821</td><td>(19,528)</td><td>—</td><td>283,355</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes payable</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>587</td><td>(587)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Current deferred tax liabilities</td><td>7,190</td><td>—</td><td>15,515</td><td>(7,190)</td><td>15,515</td></tr><tr><td>Total current liabilities</td><td>998,574</td><td>46,532</td><td>46,069</td><td>(7,777)</td><td>1,083,398</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt, less current maturities</td><td>526,999</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(25,000)</td><td>501,999</td></tr><tr><td>Intercompany payable</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>49,935</td><td>(49,935)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax liabilities</td><td>13,944</td><td>5,698</td><td>297</td><td>(5,995)</td><td>13,944</td></tr><tr><td>Other long-term liabilities</td><td>77,228</td><td>—</td><td>3,231</td><td>—</td><td>80,459</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>1,616,745</td><td>52,230</td><td>99,532</td><td>(88,707)</td><td>1,679,800</td></tr><tr><td>Total Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>1,501,272</td><td>134,683</td><td>486,061</td><td>(632,198)</td><td>1,489,818</td></tr><tr><td>Noncontrolling interest</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>2,784</td><td>—</td><td>2,784</td></tr><tr><td>Total stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>1,501,272</td><td>134,683</td><td>488,845</td><td>(632,198)</td><td>1,492,602</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities and stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>$ 3,118,017</td><td>$ 186,913</td><td>$ 588,377</td><td>$ (720,905)</td><td>$ 3,172,402</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
December 30, 2012

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 27,657</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 40,523</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 68,180</td></tr><tr><td>Restricted cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Investment in available-for-sale securities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Trade accounts and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>326,031</td><td>1,843</td><td>57,056</td><td>—</td><td>384,930</td></tr><tr><td>Account receivable from JBS USA, LLC</td><td>1,514</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,514</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td>802,282</td><td>22,813</td><td>125,201</td><td>—</td><td>950,296</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes receivable</td><td>55,306</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(587)</td><td>54,719</td></tr><tr><td>Current deferred tax assets</td><td>—</td><td>3,794</td><td>506</td><td>(4,300)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses and other current assets</td><td>29,603</td><td>—</td><td>26,444</td><td>—</td><td>56,047</td></tr><tr><td>Assets held for sale</td><td>9,808</td><td>—</td><td>17,234</td><td>—</td><td>27,042</td></tr><tr><td>Total current assets</td><td>1,252,201</td><td>28,450</td><td>266,964</td><td>(4,887)</td><td>1,542,728</td></tr><tr><td>Investment in available-for-sale securities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Intercompany receivable</td><td>19,860</td><td>53,706</td><td>—</td><td>(73,566)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Investment in subsidiaries</td><td>376,226</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(376,226)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax assets</td><td>101,100</td><td>—</td><td>422</td><td>(4,091)</td><td>97,431</td></tr><tr><td>Other long-lived assets</td><td>44,936</td><td>—</td><td>180,587</td><td>(180,000)</td><td>45,523</td></tr><tr><td>Identified intangible assets, net</td><td>27,386</td><td>—</td><td>10,880</td><td>—</td><td>38,266</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, net</td><td>1,043,696</td><td>45,746</td><td>104,368</td><td>(3,889)</td><td>1,189,921</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$ 2,865,405</td><td>$ 127,902</td><td>$ 563,221</td><td>$ (642,659)</td><td>$ 2,913,869</td></tr><tr><td>Current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>$ 15,886</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 15,886</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable</td><td>255,517</td><td>4,270</td><td>52,578</td><td>—</td><td>312,365</td></tr><tr><td>Account payable to JBS USA, LLC</td><td>13,436</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>13,436</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses and other current liabilities</td><td>230,278</td><td>24,265</td><td>28,997</td><td>—</td><td>283,540</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes payable</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,055</td><td>(587)</td><td>468</td></tr><tr><td>Current deferred tax liabilities</td><td>108,201</td><td>—</td><td>581</td><td>(4,300)</td><td>104,482</td></tr><tr><td>Total current liabilities</td><td>623,318</td><td>28,535</td><td>83,211</td><td>(4,887)</td><td>730,177</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt, less current maturities</td><td>1,173,870</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(25,000)</td><td>1,148,870</td></tr><tr><td>Note payable to JBS USA Holdings, Inc.</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Intercompany payable</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>73,566</td><td>(73,566)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax liabilities</td><td>—</td><td>3,794</td><td>297</td><td>(4,091)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other long-term liabilities</td><td>122,580</td><td>—</td><td>3,245</td><td>—</td><td>125,825</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>1,919,768</td><td>32,329</td><td>160,319</td><td>(107,544)</td><td>2,004,872</td></tr><tr><td>Total Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>945,637</td><td>95,573</td><td>400,276</td><td>(535,115)</td><td>906,371</td></tr><tr><td>Noncontrolling interest</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>2,626</td><td>—</td><td>2,626</td></tr><tr><td>Total stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>945,637</td><td>95,573</td><td>402,902</td><td>(535,115)</td><td>908,997</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities and stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>$ 2,865,405</td><td>$ 127,902</td><td>$ 563,221</td><td>$ (642,659)</td><td>$ 2,913,869</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 29, 2013

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 7,333,150</td><td>$ 521,973</td><td>$ 1,047,102</td><td>$ (491,077)</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>6,678,655</td><td>468,809</td><td>908,442</td><td>(490,197)</td><td>7,565,709</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>654,495</td><td>53,164</td><td>138,660</td><td>(880)</td><td>845,439</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td><td>152,816</td><td>4,215</td><td>23,884</td><td>—</td><td>180,915</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges, net</td><td>5,129</td><td>—</td><td>532</td><td>—</td><td>5,661</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>496,550</td><td>48,949</td><td>114,244</td><td>(880)</td><td>658,863</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>86,368</td><td>—</td><td>638</td><td>—</td><td>87,006</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>(64)</td><td>—</td><td>(2,061)</td><td>—</td><td>(2,125)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)</td><td>(2)</td><td>—</td><td>4,417</td><td>—</td><td>4,415</td></tr><tr><td>Miscellaneous, net</td><td>(11,633)</td><td>5,351</td><td>1,542</td><td>367</td><td>(4,373)</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>421,881</td><td>43,598</td><td>109,708</td><td>(1,247)</td><td>573,940</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>(5,461)</td><td>5,764</td><td>23,924</td><td>—</td><td>24,227</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) before equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries</td><td>427,342</td><td>37,834</td><td>85,784</td><td>(1,247)</td><td>549,713</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries</td><td>122,213</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(122,213)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>549,555</td><td>37,834</td><td>85,784</td><td>(123,460)</td><td>549,713</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>158</td><td>—</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride</td><td>$ 549,555</td><td>$ 37,834</td><td>$ 85,626</td><td>$ (123,460)</td><td>$ 549,555</td></tr></table>

## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended December 30, 2012

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 6,836,012</td><td>$ 537,198</td><td>$ 992,501</td><td>$ (244,329)</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>6,530,925</td><td>511,800</td><td>887,154</td><td>(244,329)</td><td>7,685,550</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>305,087</td><td>25,398</td><td>105,347</td><td>—</td><td>435,832</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td><td>156,535</td><td>—</td><td>20,506</td><td>—</td><td>177,041</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges, net</td><td>9,743</td><td>—</td><td>(1,294)</td><td>—</td><td>8,449</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>138,809</td><td>25,398</td><td>86,135</td><td>—</td><td>250,342</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>104,652</td><td>—</td><td>274</td><td>—</td><td>104,926</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>(295)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,102)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,397)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)</td><td>95</td><td>—</td><td>(4,905)</td><td>—</td><td>(4,810)</td></tr><tr><td>Miscellaneous, net</td><td>(2,131)</td><td>(14)</td><td>22</td><td>684</td><td>(1,439)</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>36,488</td><td>25,412</td><td>91,846</td><td>(684)</td><td>153,062</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>(38,852)</td><td>9,593</td><td>8,279</td><td>—</td><td>(20,980)</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) before equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries</td><td>75,340</td><td>15,819</td><td>83,567</td><td>(684)</td><td>174,042</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries</td><td>98,894</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(98,894)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>174,234</td><td>15,819</td><td>83,567</td><td>(99,578)</td><td>174,042</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(192)</td><td>—</td><td>(192)</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride</td><td>$ 174,234</td><td>$ 15,819</td><td>$ 83,759</td><td>$ (99,578)</td><td>$ 174,234</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 25, 2011

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors (In thousands)</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 6,135,319</td><td>$ 458,932</td><td>$ 1,225,128</td><td>$ (283,681)</td><td>$ 7,535,698</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of sales</td><td>6,237,535</td><td>430,343</td><td>1,291,080</td><td>(283,681)</td><td>7,675,277</td></tr><tr><td>Operational restructuring charges, net</td><td>1,958</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,958</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit (loss)</td><td>(104,174)</td><td>28,589</td><td>(65,952)</td><td>—</td><td>(141,537)</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td><td>174,694</td><td>—</td><td>30,449</td><td>—</td><td>205,143</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative restructuring charges, net</td><td>19,824</td><td>—</td><td>7,087</td><td>—</td><td>26,911</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income (loss)</td><td>(298,692)</td><td>28,589</td><td>(103,488)</td><td>—</td><td>(373,591)</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>110,940</td><td>—</td><td>592</td><td>—</td><td>111,532</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>(363)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,102)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,465)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)</td><td>(31)</td><td>—</td><td>12,632</td><td>—</td><td>12,601</td></tr><tr><td>Miscellaneous, net</td><td>59,661</td><td>3,818</td><td>(98,360)</td><td>25,748</td><td>(9,133)</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>(468,899)</td><td>24,771</td><td>(17,250)</td><td>(25,748)</td><td>(487,126)</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>(14,139)</td><td>9,351</td><td>13,352</td><td>—</td><td>8,564</td></tr><tr><td>Income (loss) before equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries</td><td>(454,760)</td><td>15,420</td><td>(30,602)</td><td>(25,748)</td><td>(495,690)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries</td><td>(9,334)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>9,334</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>(464,094)</td><td>15,420</td><td>(30,602)</td><td>(16,414)</td><td>(495,690)</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,082</td><td>—</td><td>1,082</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride</td><td>$ (464,094)</td><td>$ 15,420</td><td>$ (31,684)</td><td>$ (16,414)</td><td>$ (496,772)</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 29, 2013

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors (In thousands)</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>$ 549,555</td><td>$ 37,834</td><td>$ 85,784</td><td>$ (123,460)</td><td>$ 549,713</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax</td><td>62</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>Losses associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax</td><td>22,714</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>22,714</td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax</td><td>22,776</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>22,776</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>572,331</td><td>37,834</td><td>85,784</td><td>(123,460)</td><td>572,489</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>158</td><td>—</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation</td><td>$ 572,331</td><td>$ 37,834</td><td>$ 85,626</td><td>$ (123,460)</td><td>$ 572,331</td></tr></table>

## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended December 30, 2012

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors (In thousands)</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>$ 174,234</td><td>$ 15,819</td><td>$ 83,567</td><td>$ (99,578)</td><td>$ 174,042</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(12)</td><td>—</td><td>(12)</td></tr><tr><td>Losses associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax</td><td>(22,429)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(22,429)</td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax</td><td>(22,429)</td><td>—</td><td>(12)</td><td>—</td><td>(22,441)</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>151,805</td><td>15,819</td><td>83,555</td><td>(99,578)</td><td>151,601</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(192)</td><td>—</td><td>(192)</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation</td><td>$ 151,805</td><td>$ 15,819</td><td>$ 83,747</td><td>$ (99,578)</td><td>$ 151,793</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 25, 2011

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Parent</td><td>Subsidiary</td><td>Subsidiary</td><td>Eliminations/</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Guarantor</td><td>Non-Guarantors</td><td>Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss)</td><td>$ (464,094)</td><td>$ 15,420</td><td>$ (30,602)</td><td>$ (16,414)</td><td>$ (495,690)</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1,160)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,160)</td></tr><tr><td>Loss associated with pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax</td><td>(21,273)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(21,273)</td></tr><tr><td>Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax</td><td>(21,273)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,160)</td><td>—</td><td>(22,433)</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>(485,367)</td><td>15,420</td><td>(31,762)</td><td>(16,414)</td><td>(518,123)</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,082</td><td>—</td><td>1,082</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation</td><td>$ (485,367)</td><td>$ 15,420</td><td>$ (32,844)</td><td>$ (16,414)</td><td>$ (519,205)</td></tr></table>

## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 29, 2013

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Parent</td><td>Subsidiary</td><td>Subsidiary</td><td>Eliminations/</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Guarantor</td><td>Non-Guarantors</td><td>Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) operating activities</td><td>$ 819,071</td><td>$ 4,852</td><td>$ 54,977</td><td>$ (367)</td><td>$ 878,533</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from investing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment</td><td>(99,562)</td><td>(4,857)</td><td>(11,804)</td><td>—</td><td>(116,223)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases of investment securities</td><td>(96,902)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(96,902)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from property sales and disposals</td><td>13,042</td><td>5</td><td>18,290</td><td>—</td><td>31,337</td></tr><tr><td>Cash used in investing activities</td><td>(183,422)</td><td>(4,852)</td><td>6,486</td><td>—</td><td>(181,788)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from financing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from long-term debt</td><td>505,600</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>505,600</td></tr><tr><td>Payments on long-term debt</td><td>(758,578)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(758,578)</td></tr><tr><td>Payment of capitalized loan costs</td><td>(5,006)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(5,006)</td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefit related to share-based compensation</td><td>7,770</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>7,770</td></tr><tr><td>Other financing activities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(367)</td><td>367</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td><td>(250,214)</td><td>—</td><td>(367)</td><td>367</td><td>(250,214)</td></tr><tr><td>Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(6,505)</td><td></td><td>(6,505)</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>385,435</td><td>—</td><td>54,591</td><td>—</td><td>440,026</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period</td><td>27,657</td><td>—</td><td>40,523</td><td>—</td><td>68,180</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, end of period</td><td>$ 413,092</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 95,114</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 508,206</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended December 30, 2012

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors (In thousands)</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) operating activities</td><td>$ 174,046</td><td>$ 2,178</td><td>$ 23,653</td><td>$ (253)</td><td>$ 199,624</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from investing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment</td><td>(75,985)</td><td>(2,208)</td><td>(12,134)</td><td>—</td><td>(90,327)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases of investment securities</td><td>(73)</td><td>—</td><td>(89)</td><td>—</td><td>(162)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from sale or maturity of investment securities</td><td>57</td><td>—</td><td>631</td><td>—</td><td>688</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from property sales and disposals</td><td>26,911</td><td>—</td><td>2,489</td><td>—</td><td>29,400</td></tr><tr><td>Cash used in investing activities</td><td>(49,090)</td><td>(2,208)</td><td>(9,103)</td><td>—</td><td>(60,401)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from financing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from note payable to JBS USA</td><td>(50,000)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(50,000)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from long-term debt</td><td>851,400</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>851,400</td></tr><tr><td>Payments on long-term debt</td><td>(1,110,711)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1,110,711)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from sale of common stock</td><td>198,282</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>198,282</td></tr><tr><td>Other financing activities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(253)</td><td>253</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td><td>(111,029)</td><td>—</td><td>(253)</td><td>253</td><td>(111,029)</td></tr><tr><td>Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1,623)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,623)</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>13,927</td><td>(30)</td><td>12,674</td><td>—</td><td>26,571</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period</td><td>13,733</td><td>30</td><td>27,846</td><td>—</td><td>41,609</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, end of period</td><td>$ 27,660</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 40,520</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 68,180</td></tr></table>



## CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 25, 2011

<table><tr><td></td><td>Parent</td><td>Subsidiary Guarantor</td><td>Subsidiary Non-Guarantors</td><td>Eliminations/ Adjustments</td><td>Consolidation</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) operating activities</td><td>$ (91,621)</td><td>$ 8,973</td><td>$ (19,385)</td><td>$ (26,958)</td><td>$ (128,991)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from investing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment</td><td>(115,791)</td><td>(9,108)</td><td>(11,069)</td><td>—</td><td>(135,968)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases of investment securities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(4,596)</td><td>—</td><td>(4,596)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from sale or maturity of investment securities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>15,852</td><td>—</td><td>15,852</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from business dispositions to Swift Pork Company</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>13,000</td><td>—</td><td>13,000</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from business dispositions to JBS Trading International, Inc.</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>24,479</td><td>—</td><td>24,479</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from property sales and disposals</td><td>26,503</td><td>165</td><td>2,376</td><td>—</td><td>29,044</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) investing activities</td><td>(89,288)</td><td>(8,943)</td><td>40,042</td><td>—</td><td>(58,189)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from financing activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from note payable to JBS USA</td><td>50,000</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>50,000</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from long-term debt</td><td>965,689</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>965,689</td></tr><tr><td>Payments on long-term debt</td><td>(881,833)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(881,833)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchase of remaining interest in subsidiary</td><td>(2,504)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(2,504)</td></tr><tr><td>Payment of capitalized loan costs</td><td>(4,395)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(4,395)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash dividends paid</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(25,000)</td><td>25,000</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other financing activities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(2,065)</td><td>1,958</td><td>(107)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td><td>126,957</td><td>—</td><td>(27,065)</td><td>26,958</td><td>126,850</td></tr><tr><td>Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(4,138)</td><td>—</td><td>(4,138)</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>(53,952)</td><td>30</td><td>(10,546)</td><td>—</td><td>(64,468)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period</td><td>67,685</td><td>—</td><td>38,392</td><td>—</td><td>106,077</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents, end of period</td><td>$ 13,733</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 27,846</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 41,609</td></tr></table>

## 21. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED-SEE ACCOMPANYING ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT)

<table><tr><td>2013</td><td>First</td><td>Second</td><td>Third</td><td>Fourth \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>Year</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except per share data)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 2,036,929</td><td>$ 2,184,118</td><td>$ 2,142,816</td><td>$ 2,047,285</td><td>$ 8,411,148</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>118,434</td><td>282,507</td><td>236,573</td><td>207,925</td><td>845,439</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PPC common stockholders</td><td>54,582</td><td>190,704</td><td>160,917</td><td>143,352</td><td>549,555</td></tr><tr><td>Net income per share amounts - basic and diluted</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.62</td><td>0.55</td><td>2.12</td></tr><tr><td>Number of days in quarter</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>364</td></tr></table>

(a) In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company recognized expenses related to the shutdown of our Dallas plant of $.5 million and asset impairment charges of $.5 million.



## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

<table><tr><td>2012</td><td>First</td><td>Second</td><td>Third</td><td>Fourth \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>Year</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except per share data)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 1,888,773</td><td>$ 1,974,469</td><td>$ 2,068,478</td><td>$ 2,189,662</td><td>$ 8,121,382</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit (loss)</td><td>110,065</td><td>144,089</td><td>106,135</td><td>75,543</td><td>435,832</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss attributable to PPC common stockholders</td><td>39,173</td><td>69,357</td><td>42,931</td><td>22,773</td><td>174,234</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss per share amounts - basic and diluted</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.27</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.70</td></tr><tr><td>Number of days in quarter</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>98</td><td>371</td></tr></table>

(a) In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company recognized expenses related to the shutdown of our Dallas plant of $1.1 million and asset impairment charges of $1.4 million.

<table><tr><td>2011</td><td>First</td><td>Second</td><td>Third</td><td>Fourth \( ^{(a)} \)</td><td>Year</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="4">(In thousands, except per share data)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>1,892,476</td><td>1,922,690</td><td>1,891,224</td><td>1,829,308</td><td>7,535,698</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>(53,110)</td><td>(46,228)</td><td>(62,387)</td><td>20,188</td><td>(141,537)</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) attributable to PPC common stockholders</td><td>(120,760)</td><td>(128,141)</td><td>(162,516)</td><td>(85,355)</td><td>(496,772)</td></tr><tr><td>Net income (loss) per share amounts - basic and diluted</td><td>(0.54)</td><td>(0.57)</td><td>(0.72)</td><td>(0.38)</td><td>(2.21)</td></tr><tr><td>Number of days in quarter</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>91</td><td>364</td></tr></table>

(a) In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company recognized restructuring charges of $14.6 million, asset impairment charges of $11.3 million and net gains on derivative financial instruments of $3.1 million.



## SCHEDULE II
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Beginning Balance</td><td colspan="4">Additions</td><td rowspan="2">Deductions</td><td rowspan="2">Ending Balance</td></tr><tr><td>Charged to Operating Results</td><td colspan="2">Charged to Other Accounts</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(In thousands)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade Accounts and Other Receivables—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>$ 3,757</td><td>$ 1,668</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$ 1,369 (a)</td><td>$ 4,056</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2012</td><td>5,163</td><td>(1,629)</td><td></td><td>—</td><td>(223) (a)</td><td>3,757</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2011</td><td>6,063</td><td>(1,095)</td><td></td><td>—</td><td>(195) (a)</td><td>5,163</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade Accounts and Other Receivables—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for Sales Adjustments:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>$ 10,152</td><td>$ 159,417</td><td>$</td><td>—</td><td>$ 162,480 (b)</td><td>$ 7,089</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2012</td><td>8,030</td><td>147,126</td><td></td><td>—</td><td>145,004 (b)</td><td>10,152</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2011</td><td>22,929</td><td>154,842</td><td></td><td>—</td><td>169,741 (b)</td><td>8,030</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred Tax Assets—</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Valuation Allowance:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>$ 188,354</td><td>$ (164,180)</td><td>$ (13,774)</td><td>$</td><td>— (c)</td><td>$ 10,400</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2012</td><td>230,336</td><td>(50,455)</td><td>8,473</td><td>—</td><td>(c)</td><td>188,354</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2011</td><td>53,938</td><td>168,368</td><td>8,030</td><td>—</td><td>(c)</td><td>230,336</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.

(b) Deductions either written off, rebilled or reclassified as liabilities for market development fund rebates.

(c) Reductions in the valuation allowance.



## Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

As disclosed in the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012, the Company changed its independent registered public accountants effective March 14, 2012.

## Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of December 29, 2013, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")). Based on that evaluation, the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, concluded the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that information we are required to disclose in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the evaluation described above, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, identified no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s quarter ended December 29, 2013, and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.



## MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation's (“PPC”) management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). PPC's internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, PPC's management assessed the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2013 based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on this assessment, management concluded that PPC's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 29, 2013. KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2013. That report is included in this annual report.



# REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

We have audited Pilgrim's Pride Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Pilgrim's Pride Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation as of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2013 and the fifty-three weeks ended December 30, 2012, and our report dated February 21, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
February 21, 2014



## Item 9B. Other Information

As previously announced, the Company filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions on December 1, 2008 and emerged from bankruptcy on December 28, 2009. The Chapter 11 cases were being jointly administered under case number 08-45664. The Company has and intends to continue to post important information about the restructuring, including quarterly operating reports and other financial information required by the Bankruptcy Court, on the Company's website www.pilgrims.com under the "Investors-Reorganization" caption. The quarterly operating reports are required to be filed with the Bankruptcy Court no later than the 20th day of the next calendar month immediately following the end of the fiscal quarter and will be posted on the Company's website concurrently with being filed with the Bankruptcy Court. The Company uses its website as a means of complying with its disclosure obligations under Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation FD. The information contained on or accessible through the Company's website shall not be deemed to be part of this annual report.



## Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Certain information regarding our executive officers has been presented under “Executive Officers” included in “Item 1. Business,” above.

Reference is made to the sections entitled “Election of JBS Directors” and “Election of Equity Directors and the Founder Director” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which section is incorporated herein by reference.

Reference is made to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which section is incorporated herein by reference.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The full text of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is published on our website, at www.pilgrims.com, under the “Investors-Corporate Governance” caption. We intend to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of this Code on our website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”

## Item 11. Executive Compensation

See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”

## Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

## Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information about our common stock that may be issued under the Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), as of December 29, 2013. For additional information concerning terms of the LTIP, see “Note 14. Incentive Compensation” of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report.

<table><tr><td>Plan Category</td><td>Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights</td><td>Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Option, Warrants and Rights</td><td>Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6,585,393</td></tr><tr><td>Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6,585,393</td></tr></table>

See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”

## Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Additional information responsive to Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Security Ownership,” “Board of Directors Independence,” “Committees of the Board of Directors,” “Election of JBS Directors,” “Election of Equity Directors and the Founder Director,” “Report of the Compensation Committee,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Transactions” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

## Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Information” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.



## Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

## (a) Financial Statements

(1) The financial statements and schedules listed in the index to financial statements and schedules on page 1 of this annual report are filed as part of this annual report.

(2) All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted.

(3) The financial statements schedule entitled “Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves” is filed as part of this annual report on page 101.

## (b) Exhibits

## Exhibit Number

2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated September 15, 1986, by and among Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Texas corporation; Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Doris Pilgrim Julian, Aubrey Hal Pilgrim, Paulette Pilgrim Rolston, Evanne Pilgrim, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Greta Pilgrim Owens and Patrick Wayne Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-8805) effective November 14, 1986).

2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 27, 2000 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2 of WLR Foods, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 000-17060) dated September 28, 2000).

2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2006, by and among the Company, Protein Acquisition Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Gold Kist Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.(D)(1) to Amendment No. 11 to the Company’s Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed on December 5, 2006).

2.4 Stock Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc., dated September 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 18, 2009).

2.5 Amendment No. 1 to the Stock Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc., dated December 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed January 22, 2010).

3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-A filed on December 27, 2012).

3.2 Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 8-A filed on December 27, 2012).

4.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (included as Exhibit 3.1).

4.2 Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (included as Exhibit 3.2).

4.3 Stockholders Agreement dated December 28, 2009 between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed on December 27, 2012).

4.4 Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2009).

4.5 Indenture dated as of December 14, 2010 among the Company, Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation of West Virginia, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010).

4.6 Form of Senior 7.875% Note due 2018 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010).

4.7 Form of Guarantee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010).



Additional long-term debt instruments are not filed since the total amount of those securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

10.1 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 27, 2004). †

10.2 Change to Company Contribution Amount Under the Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 30, 2008). †

10.3 Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 30, 2009). †

10.4 Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 30, 2009). †

10.5 Employment Agreement dated January 14, 2011 between the Company and William Lovette (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2011). †

10.6 Restricted Share Agreement dated January 14, 2011 between the Company and William Lovette (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2011). †

10.7 Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of June 23, 2011, between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2011).

10.8 Amended and Restated MXN5557,415,000 Credit Agreement dated as of October 19, 2011, by and among Avicola Pilgrim's Pride de México, S.A. de C.V. ("Avicola"), Pilgrim's Pride, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("PPS", together with Avicola, the "Borrowers"), certain subsidiaries of the Borrowers (the "Subsidiary Guarantors"), ING Bank (México), S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, ING Grupo Financiero, as lender and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent and lead arranger (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2011).

10.9 Amendment No. 1 to the Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of October 26, 2011, between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 2012).

10.10 Amendment No. 2 to the Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of December 16, 2011, between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2011).

10.11 First Amendment to Amended and Restated MXN5557,415,000 Credit Agreement dated as of December 13, 2011, by and among the Borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantors, the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent and lead arranger (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2011).

10.12 Waiver and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2012, by and among Avicola Pilgrim's Pride de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Pilgrim's Pride, S. de R.L. de C.V., their subsidiaries, as guarantors, ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2012).

10.13 Pilgrim's Pride Corporation 2012 Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2012). †

10.14 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2012). †

10.15 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated MXN5557,415,000 Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2013, by and among Avicola Pilgrim's Pride de México, S.A. de C.V. and Pilgrim's Pride, S. de R.L. de C.V., as borrowers, the subsidiaries of the borrowers party thereto, the banks and other financial institutions party thereto and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent and lead arranger (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 1, 2013).

10.16 Amendment and Restatement to Credit Agreement dated August 7, 2013 among Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, To-Ricos Distribution, Ltd., CoBank, ABC, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2013).



12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the years ended December 29, 2013, December 30, 2012, December 25, 2011, December 26, 2010, and September 26, 2009 and the transition period from September 27, 2009 to December 27, 2009.*

21 Subsidiaries of Registrant.*

23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP.*

23.2 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.*

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

* Filed herewith

** Furnished herewith

† Represents a management contract or compensation plan arrangement



## SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 21, 2014.

## PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION

By: /s/ Fabio Sandri
Fabio Sandri
Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

<table><tr><td>Signature</td><td>Title</td><td>Date</td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Gilberto Tomazoni</td><td>Chairman of the Board</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Gilberto Tomazoni</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ William W. Lovette</td><td>President and Chief Executive Officer</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>William W. Lovette</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Fabio Sandri</td><td>Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Fabio Sandri</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Joesley Mendonça Batista</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Joesley Mendonça Batista</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Wesley Mendonça Batista</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Wesley Mendonça Batista</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ David E. Bell</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>David E. Bell</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Michael L. Cooper</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Michael L. Cooper</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Charles Macaluso</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Charles Macaluso</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes</td><td>Director</td><td>February 21, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>



2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated September 15, 1986, by and among Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Texas corporation; Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Doris Pilgrim Julian, Aubrey Hal Pilgrim, Paulette Pilgrim Rolston, Evanne Pilgrim, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Greta Pilgrim Owens and Patrick Wayne Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-8805) effective November 14, 1986).

2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 27, 2000 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2 of WLR Foods, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 000-17060) dated September 28, 2000).

2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2006, by and among the Company, Protein Acquisition Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Gold Kist Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.D)(1) to Amendment No. 11 to the Company’s Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed on December 5, 2006).

2.4 Stock Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc., dated September 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 18, 2009).

2.5 Amendment No. 1 to the Stock Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc., dated December 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed January 22, 2010).

3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-A filed on December 27, 2012).

3.2 Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 8-A filed on December 27, 2012).

4.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (included as Exhibit 3.1).

4.2 Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (included as Exhibit 3.2).

4.3 Stockholders Agreement dated December 28, 2009 between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed on December 27, 2012).

4.4 Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2009).

4.5 Indenture dated as of December 14, 2010 among the Company, Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation of West Virginia, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010).

4.6 Form of Senior 7.875% Note due 2018 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010).

4.7 Form of Guarantee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010).

Additional long-term debt instruments are not filed since the total amount of those securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

10.1 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 27, 2004). †

10.2 Change to Company Contribution Amount Under the Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 30, 2008). †

10.3 Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Short-Term Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 30, 2009). †

10.4 Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 30, 2009). †

10.5 Employment Agreement dated January 14, 2011 between the Company and William Lovette (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2011). †



10.6 Restricted Share Agreement dated January 14, 2011 between the Company and William Lovette (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2011). †

10.7 Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of June 23, 2011, between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2011).

10.8 Amended and Restated MXN$557,415,000 Credit Agreement dated as of October 19, 2011, by and among Avícola Pilgrim's Pride de México, S.A. de C.V. ("Avícola"), Pilgrim's Pride, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("PPS", together with Avícola, the "Borrowers"), certain subsidiaries of the Borrowers (the "Subsidiary Guarantors"), ING Bank (México), S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, ING Grupo Financiero, as lender and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent and lead arranger (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2011).

10.9 Amendment No. 1 to the Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of October 26, 2011, between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 2012).

10.10 Amendment No. 2 to the Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of December 16, 2011, between the Company and JBS USA Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2011).

10.11 First Amendment to Amended and Restated MXN$557,415,000 Credit Agreement dated as of December 13, 2011, by and among the Borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantors, the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent and lead arranger (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2011).

10.12 Waiver and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2012, by and among Avícola Pilgrim's Pride de México, S.A. de C.V., Pilgrim's Pride, S. de R.L. de C.V., their subsidiaries, as guarantors, ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2012).

10.13 Pilgrim's Pride Corporation 2012 Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2012). †

10.14 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2012). †

10.15 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated MXN$557,415,000 Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2013, by and among Avícola Pilgrim's Pride de México, S.A. de C.V. and Pilgrim's Pride, S. de R.L. de C.V., as borrowers, the subsidiaries of the borrowers party thereto, the banks and other financial institutions party thereto and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent and lead arranger (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 1, 2013).

10.16 Amendment and Restatement to Credit Agreement dated August 7, 2013 among Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, To-Ricos Distribution, Ltd., CoBank, ABC, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2013).

12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the years ended December 29, 2013, December 30, 2012, December 25, 2011, December 26, 2010 and September 26, 2009 and the transition period from September 27, 2009 to December 27, 2009.*

21 Subsidiaries of Registrant.*

23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP.*

23.2 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.*

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**



101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

* Filed herewith

** Furnished herewith

† Represents a management contract or compensation plan arrangement



## EXHIBIT 12
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>Transition Period</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 573,940</td><td>$ 153,062</td><td>$ (487,126)</td><td>$ 66,488</td><td>$ (68,446)</td><td>$ (173,849)</td></tr><tr><td>Add: Total fixed charges (see below)</td><td>88,660</td><td>113,011</td><td>126,111</td><td>132,905</td><td>48,899</td><td>181,094</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Interest capitalized</td><td>(586)</td><td>(1,717)</td><td>(3,424)</td><td>(1,296)</td><td>(1,082)</td><td>(2,619)</td></tr><tr><td>Total earnings</td><td>662,014</td><td>264,356</td><td>(364,439)</td><td>198,097</td><td>(20,629)</td><td>4,626</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed charges:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interesf(a)</td><td>87,592</td><td>106,643</td><td>114,955</td><td>118,574</td><td>45,756</td><td>164,548</td></tr><tr><td>Portion of noncancelable lease expense representative of interest factor(b)</td><td>1,068</td><td>6,368</td><td>11,156</td><td>14,331</td><td>3,143</td><td>16,546</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed charges</td><td>88,660</td><td>113,011</td><td>126,111</td><td>132,905</td><td>48,899</td><td>181,094</td></tr><tr><td>Ratio of earnings to fixed charges</td><td>7.47</td><td>2.34</td><td>(c)</td><td>1.49</td><td>(d)</td><td>(e)</td></tr></table>

(a) Interest includes amortization of capitalized financing fees.

(b) One-third of noncancelable lease expense is assumed to be representative of the interest factor.

(c) Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $490.6 million.

(d) Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $69.5 million.

(e) Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $176.5 million.



## EXHIBIT 21
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<table><tr><td colspan="2">US Subsidiaries</td></tr><tr><td>PFS Distribution Company</td><td>Delaware</td></tr><tr><td>Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride, LLC</td><td>Delaware</td></tr><tr><td>POPPSA 3, LLC</td><td>Delaware</td></tr><tr><td>POPPSA 4, LLC</td><td>Delaware</td></tr><tr><td>PPC Transportation Company</td><td>Delaware</td></tr><tr><td>Merit Provisions, LLC</td><td>Delaware</td></tr><tr><td>GC Properties</td><td>Georgia</td></tr><tr><td>Luker Inc.</td><td>Georgia</td></tr><tr><td>PPC of Alabama, Inc.</td><td>Georgia</td></tr><tr><td>Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Affordable Housing Corporation</td><td>Nevada</td></tr><tr><td>Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride of Nevada, Inc.</td><td>Nevada</td></tr><tr><td>PPC Marketing, Ltd.</td><td>Texas</td></tr><tr><td>Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Corporation of West Virginia, Inc.</td><td>West Virginia</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td colspan="2">Foreign Subsidiaries</td></tr><tr><td>To-Ricos Distribution, Ltd.</td><td>Bermuda</td></tr><tr><td>To-Ricos, Ltd.</td><td>Bermuda</td></tr><tr><td>Avícola Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride de Mexico, S. A. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Carnes y Productos Avícolas de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Comercializadora de Carnes de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Incubadora Hidalgo S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Gallina Pesada S.A. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Grupo Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride Funding Holdings, S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Grupo Pilgrim&#x27;s Prince Funding, S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Inmobiliaria Avícola Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride, S. de R.L.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Operadora de Productos Avícolas S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td></tr><tr><td>Servicios Administrativos Pilgrim&#x27;s Pride S. de R.L. de C.V.</td><td>Mexico</td>



# EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-74984; 333-111929; 333-163639; 333-179563; 333-182586 and 333-186934) on Form S-8 of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation of our reports dated February 21, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation as of December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2013 and fifty-three weeks ended December 30, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2013, which reports appear in the December 29, 2013 annual report on Form 10-K of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation.

The audit report covering the December 29, 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements contains an explanatory paragraph that states that we also have audited the retrospective adjustments applied to earnings per share in the 2011 consolidated financial statements as described in “Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity” under the section “Rights Offering.” In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2011 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2011 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 21, 2014



# EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74984) pertaining to the Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Employee Stock Investment Plan,

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-111929) pertaining to the Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Employee Stock Investment Plan,

(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-163639) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Plan of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation,

(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-179563) pertaining to the Pilgrim's Pride Retirement Savings Plan and the To-Ricos Employee Savings and Retirement Plan,

(5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-182586) pertaining to the Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan, and

(6) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-186934) pertaining to the Restricted Share Agreement between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and William W. Lovette;

of our report dated February 17, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in “Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity,” and schedule of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation for the year ended December 29, 2013.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 20, 2014



# CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William W. Lovette, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013, of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 21, 2014

/s/ William W. Lovette

William W. Lovette

Chief Executive Officer



# CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fabio Sandri, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013, of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 21, 2014

/s/ Fabio Sandri

Fabio Sandri

Chief Financial Officer



# CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: February 21, 2014

/s/ William W. Lovette

William W. Lovette

Chief Executive Officer



# CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: February 21, 2014

/s/ Fabio Sandri

Fabio Sandri

Chief Financial Officer



This page intentionally left blank.



This page intentionally left blank.



Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)