AT&T Inc. (T, NYSE)
Industry: Telecom Services
Annual report, fiscal year 2014


mobilizing your world

AT&T INC. 2014 Annual Report



Imagine a world

where your life is always connected to people, information and experiences – wherever you are, wherever you’re going. A place where life is just plain better. Welcome to your world ...

Mobilized

Explore that world at att.com/annualreport2014

On the Cover:
We do more than put the “connected”
in Audi connected cars ... we’re helping
to shape the customer experience

Visit att.com/AR-connectedcars for more information




Randall Stephenson
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President

## To our investors

Fast, secure and mobile connectivity to everything on the Internet – everywhere, at every moment and on every device – is what drives us at AT&T. It is why we build wireless and wired networks engineered to handle massive volumes. And the more capacity and speed we build into our networks, the more intensively and creatively our customers use them. Today, our customers are taking advantage of these networks, streaming video to all of their devices at unprecedented levels. In fact, today more than 50 percent of our network traffic is video.

The byproduct of our investments in these advanced networks has been rapid innovation across the entire technology ecosystem – software services, cloud computing, mobile apps and connected devices. All of this is changing how people live, how businesses run and how economies grow.
But these investments are also changing AT&T into a vastly different company with unique capabilities serving new markets that will further differentiate us from our competitors. Over the past several years, we have taken several steps to position AT&T for the future, while rewarding you, our shareholders, with solid returns.

Watch Works
How AT&T helped Timex,
Qualcomm and Synchronoss
create the ultimate runner's
smartwatch

Visit att.com/AR-wearables for more information






## A premier network experience

It all begins with delivering a premier network experience. From 2012 to 2014, we substantially completed our VIP network upgrade plan, investing at historic levels. The result is a combination of wireless, wired and – with DIRECTV – satellite networks that handle unmatched volumes of traffic, principally video.

We now cover more than 300 million people in the United States with our LTE mobile service; along the way, we re-engineered our network so that it now delivers the strongest LTE signal in the United States. \( ^{1} \)  We deployed wired high-speed Internet service to 57 million customer locations. And we now have high-speed fiber connections to more than 1 million U.S. business locations, including those added through Project VIP. Between now and 2020, we expect the vast majority of wireline customers to transition to our most advanced network technology and, in the process, significantly reduce our operating costs.

Staying ahead of our customers’ growing demand for mobile Internet service, particularly video entertainment, requires access to significant wireless radio spectrum. Over the past year, we made several spectrum investments – highlighted by our Leap Wireless acquisition in 2014 and the $18.2 billion we committed to invest earlier this year in a government auction to acquire a near-nationwide block of high-quality spectrum. Why was this important?

Over the last eight years,
mobile data traffic on our
wireless network increased
100,000 percent – driven
by people downloading and
sharing videos.

Less visible to customers today, but fundamental to how we’ll serve them and stay ahead of the escalating capacity demands created by video, is the work we’re doing to virtualize more and more of our core network functions. This means we’re putting software rather than hardware at the center of our network and IT infrastructure. The advantages of this shift to software are game changing – dramatically lowering our costs, accelerating the rollout of new services and giving greater control to our customers.



## Expanding our video business

Earlier, I pointed out that video is driving huge increases in network traffic. That’s no surprise when you consider that customers want their video on every screen, whether it’s traditional pay TV service, video streamed over an Internet connection or video to a mobile device. So, in addition to our network investments, we’ve been assembling the other pieces needed to lead in delivering video when, where and how customers want it.

Our acquisition of DIRECTV, which we expect to complete in the first half of 2015, will make us the world’s largest pay TV provider, giving us nationwide reach in the United States, plus 11 Latin American countries. DIRECTV’s premier TV service significantly improves the economics and expands the geographic reach of our current TV business. The acquisition places us in the best position to provide customers with integrated packages of TV, mobile and high-speed Internet services.

DIRECTV will also provide us with the best content-owner relationships in the industry. These relationships are critical to being able to deliver premium content across multiple screens, particularly mobile devices, to meet consumers' future video viewing and programming preferences. Getting more content to more screens is also the aim of our Otter Media joint venture with The Chernin Group, which is building new digital video brands and online services.

DIRECTV’s superior quality and profitable nationwide TV service make it economically attractive to significantly expand our high-speed Internet service to a total of 70 million customer locations, because people like to buy TV and Internet service together.

Not only does DIRECTV perfectly complement our existing business, it significantly diversifies our revenue mix and is expected to be accretive within a year after close on a free cash flow per share and adjusted EPS basis.

## Expanding our mobile network to Mexico

We believe that the model in the United States, with exploding demand for mobile Internet service and all the associated economic benefits, will be repeated around the world

¡Bienvenidos, México!
AT&T is expanding into Latin America...and bringing the mobile Internet revolution to Mexico



Visit att.com/AR-mexico for more information



as companies invest in high-speed mobile networks. That belief has us searching for opportunities to invest in wireless outside the U.S. where the regulatory, investment and economic climate is right.

We believe that environment now exists in Mexico. Recent changes in Mexico’s legal and regulatory framework have made it very attractive for a new entrant. We closed our Iusacell acquisition in early 2015 and expect to complete our Nextel Mexico deal by mid-year. Once we do, we’ll move quickly to build a world-class mobile business in a country with a strong economic outlook, a growing middle class and close trade, cultural and geographic ties to the United States.

We’ll be able to offer customers the first-ever North American Mobile Service area – one seamless network that will cover more than 400 million people and businesses in the United States and Mexico. For families and businesses that span the border, AT&T will be the only company with an advanced mobile network – built for video – across both countries.

## NORTH AMERICAN MOBILE SERVICE AREA



TO COVER
MORE THAN

400M

PEOPLE AND
BUSINESSES

## A new kind of company

By the end of 2015, once we close our DIRECTV and Nextel Mexico acquisitions, we will be a very different company. Our revenue mix will be much more diversified, and our ability to integrate products and services will set us apart from competitors. Our revenues will come from four areas:

• Business services (wireless and wired) will be our largest revenue stream

• U.S. consumer TV and Internet service will be second

• U.S. consumer mobility will be third, comprising about 20 percent of total revenues

• Mexico and Latin American TV and mobility will be our smallest but fastest-growing area

We like that mix a lot. Not only will a more diversified mix of services, customers and geographies make us much less dependent on the U.S. consumer wireless market, we’ll be a new breed of company – one that will redefine what a communications company is and what it does.

We will be a company with the ability to deliver video to any device. We will be able to deliver integrated capabilities across a diversified base of services, customers, geographies and technology platforms that are mobile, fast and highly secure. We will have a path to profitable TV growth. And we will have a nice set of growing Latin American businesses positioned well in video and the mobile Internet.



## DIVERSIFYING OUR REVENUES

By the end of 2015, AT&T expects its largest revenue stream will be business (wired and wireless)



Regulation that looks forward, not back

The historic investments that catapulted America to global leadership in the mobile Internet and high-tech innovation were the direct result of deliberate and wise government policy. Since the Clinton administration, policymakers have agreed, on a bipartisan basis, that light-touch regulation was the proper approach for the Internet. This decision helped unleash nearly two decades of amazing innovation rooted in equally amazing levels of investment. Now, in a major reversal, administration officials are proposing a radically different formula that includes end-to-end regulation of the Internet.

For several years now, we’ve endorsed the principles of net neutrality. We agreed to them when the FCC first established net neutrality rules in 2010. We also agreed with the set of net neutrality principles laid out by President Obama last fall. We still do. But key policymakers in the administration and at the FCC are now going well beyond any previous concept of net neutrality. They are attempting to regulate the entire Internet under an arcane law called Title II that was written in 1934 to regulate the rotary dial telephone. We feel this antiquated approach will damage investment and damage the Internet itself. I won’t belabor the point here, but you will see us continue to aggressively make the case to policymakers – and, if necessary, to the courts – that the FCC’s proposed Title II regulation of the entire Internet is at best a solution in search of a problem and at worst a threat to the United States’ continued global leadership in technology and innovation.



## Financial results built on strength

It’s taken a tremendous amount of your capital to strengthen our premier network and lay the groundwork for our future – nearly $140 billion over the past six years. \( ^{2} \) 

## We’ve been able to invest at this level because we have one of the strongest balance sheets of any major U.S. telecom company.

And it’s paid off with our having what I would argue is the premier network – not just in the U.S., but in the world. Now that we’ve met our significant network transformation goals ahead of schedule, going forward you can expect us to return to normal capital expenditure levels.



Network of the Future
Hear how AT&T is leading the
mobile Internet revolution and
building the premier network to
meet demand for mobile data

Visit att.com/AR-premiernetwork for more information

Last year, we grew revenues to $132.4 billion, grew adjusted earnings per share to $2.51, generated $31.3 billion in cash from operations and realized $8.1 billion more from selling non-strategic assets. In addition to investments in future growth, we also increased our quarterly dividend for the 31 \( ^{st} \)  consecutive year, and returned more than $11 billion directly to shareowners through dividends and share repurchases.

This kind of financial strength that allows us to invest in the future while returning value to you will continue to be a hallmark of AT&T.

Looking ahead, I’m more confident than ever that we have the right team and the right strategy to define the future, just as we have shaped the past. As we execute that vision, I want to thank you, as always, for your continued confidence in AT&T.

Sincerely,



Randall Stephenson
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President
February 10, 2015



## Financial Highlights

RAMPING REVENUE GROWTH

AT&T’s full-year consolidated revenues grew more than 3 percent, adjusting for the sale of Connecticut wireline properties

SOLID BUSINESS REVENUE GROWTH

Total 2014 revenues from business customers, including wireless and wireline, were $71.9 billion and grew 4.0 percent, with fourth-quarter revenues up 5.8 percent

WIRELINE GROWTH DRIVERS
TOP MORE THAN $25 BILLION
IN ANNUALIZED REVENUES

AT&T U-verse and strategic business services combined for more than $25 billion in annualized revenues by the end of 2014, and both are growing in the double digits, adjusting for the sale of our Connecticut wireline properties

2014 ADJUSTED REVENUES

$131.6B

2013: $127.6B

▲ 3.1%

Adjusted YOY Growth

BUSINESS SOLUTIONS REVENUES

$71.9B

2013: $69.1B

▲ 4.0%

YOY Growth

U-VERSE

$14.5B

Total Adjusted Revenues

▲ 24.8%

Adjusted YOY Growth

STRATEGIC BUSINESS SERVICES

$9.7B

Total Adjusted Revenues

▲ 14.4%

Adjusted YOY Growth



Additional Highlights

~45 MILLION

TOTAL WORLDWIDE VIDEO SUBSCRIBERS
AFTER DIRECTV CLOSES \( ^{3} \) 

BUSINESS CUSTOMERS
REPRESENTED

54.3%

OF OUR TOTAL
2014 REVENUES
(WIRELESS & WIRELINE)



100%
WE SERVE
100%
OF THE FORTUNE 1,000
WISE SERVICE

In 2014, AT&T delivered the company’s best-ever full-year postpaid churn and added nearly twice as many postpaid subscribers as it did in 2013

1.04%

BEST-EVER WIRELESS POSTPAID CHURN



POSTPAID NET ADDS UP NEARLY 2X

2012 1,438k
2013 1,776k
2014 3,290k

CASH FROM OPERATIONS >$30B

FOR 8 STRAIGHT YEARS



## AT&T Inc. Financial Review 2014



Selected Financial and Operating Data 10
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11
Consolidated Financial Statements 42
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 47
Report of Management 76
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 77
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 78
Board of Directors 79
Executive Officers 80



<table><tr><td>At December 31 and for the year ended:</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>Financial Data</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating revenues</td><td>$132,447</td><td>$128,752</td><td>$127,434</td><td>$126,723</td><td>$124,280</td></tr><tr><td>Operating expenses</td><td>$120,701</td><td>$ 98,273</td><td>$114,437</td><td>$117,505</td><td>$104,707</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>$ 11,746</td><td>$ 30,479</td><td>$ 12,997</td><td>$ 9,218</td><td>$ 19,573</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>$ 3,613</td><td>$ 3,940</td><td>$ 3,444</td><td>$ 3,535</td><td>$ 2,994</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income of affiliates</td><td>$ 175</td><td>$ 642</td><td>$ 752</td><td>$ 784</td><td>$ 762</td></tr><tr><td>Other income - net</td><td>$ 1,652</td><td>$ 596</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 249</td><td>$ 897</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>$ 3,442</td><td>$ 9,224</td><td>$ 2,900</td><td>$ 2,532</td><td>$ (1,162)</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income</td><td>$ 6,518</td><td>$ 18,553</td><td>$ 7,539</td><td>$ 4,184</td><td>$ 20,179</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest</td><td>$ (294)</td><td>$ (304)</td><td>$ (275)</td><td>$ (240)</td><td>$ (315)</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 6,224</td><td>$ 18,249</td><td>$ 7,264</td><td>$ 3,944</td><td>$ 19,864</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings Per Common Share:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 1.19</td><td>$ 3.39</td><td>$ 1.25</td><td>$ 0.66</td><td>$ 3.36</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings Per Common Share - Assuming Dilution:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 1.19</td><td>$ 3.39</td><td>$ 1.25</td><td>$ 0.66</td><td>$ 3.35</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$292,829</td><td>$277,787</td><td>$272,315</td><td>$270,442</td><td>$269,473</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>$ 76,011</td><td>$ 69,290</td><td>$ 66,358</td><td>$ 61,300</td><td>$ 58,971</td></tr><tr><td>Total debt</td><td>$ 82,067</td><td>$ 74,788</td><td>$ 69,844</td><td>$ 64,753</td><td>$ 66,167</td></tr><tr><td>Construction and capital expenditures</td><td>$ 21,433</td><td>$ 21,228</td><td>$ 19,728</td><td>$ 20,272</td><td>$ 20,302</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends declared per common share</td><td>$ 1.85</td><td>$ 1.81</td><td>$ 1.77</td><td>$ 1.73</td><td>$ 1.69</td></tr><tr><td>Book value per common share</td><td>$ 16.76</td><td>$ 17.50</td><td>$ 16.61</td><td>$ 17.85</td><td>$ 18.94</td></tr><tr><td>Ratio of earnings to fixed charges</td><td>2.83</td><td>5.98</td><td>2.96</td><td>2.23</td><td>4.57</td></tr><tr><td>Debt ratio</td><td>48.6%</td><td>45.0%</td><td>43.0%</td><td>38.0%</td><td>37.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average common shares outstanding (000,000)</td><td>5,205</td><td>5,368</td><td>5,801</td><td>5,928</td><td>5,913</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average common shares outstanding with dilution (000,000)</td><td>5,221</td><td>5,385</td><td>5,821</td><td>5,950</td><td>5,938</td></tr><tr><td>End of period common shares outstanding (000,000)</td><td>5,187</td><td>5,226</td><td>5,581</td><td>5,927</td><td>5,911</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Data</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Wireless subscribers (000) \( ^{1} \)</td><td>120,554</td><td>110,376</td><td>106,957</td><td>103,247</td><td>95,536</td></tr><tr><td>In-region network access lines in service (000)</td><td>19,896</td><td>24,639</td><td>29,279</td><td>34,054</td><td>39,211</td></tr><tr><td>Broadband connections (000) \( ^{2} \)</td><td>16,028</td><td>16,425</td><td>16,390</td><td>16,427</td><td>16,309</td></tr><tr><td>Number of employees</td><td>243,620</td><td>243,360</td><td>241,810</td><td>256,420</td><td>266,590</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \) The number presented represents 100% of AT&T Mobility wireless subscribers.

 \( ^{2} \) Broadband connections include in-region U-verse high speed Internet access, in-region DSL lines and satellite broadband.



For ease of reading, AT&T Inc. is referred to as “we,” “AT&T” or the “Company” throughout this document, and the names of the particular subsidiaries and affiliates providing the services generally have been omitted. AT&T is a holding company whose subsidiaries and affiliates operate in the communications services industry in both the United States and internationally, providing wireless and wireline telecommunications services and equipment. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. A reference to a “Note” in this section refers to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In the tables throughout this section, percentage increases and decreases that are not considered meaningful are denoted with a dash.

## RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Results Our financial results are summarized in the table below. We then discuss factors affecting our overall results for the past three years. These factors are discussed in more detail in our “Segment Results” section. We also discuss our expected revenue and expense trends for 2015 in the “Operating Environment and Trends of the Business” section.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="5">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$118,437</td><td>$119,252</td><td>$118,506</td><td>(0.7)%</td><td>0.6%</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>14,010</td><td>9,500</td><td>8,928</td><td>47.5</td><td>6.4</td></tr><tr><td>Total Operating Revenues</td><td>132,447</td><td>128,752</td><td>127,434</td><td>2.9</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cost of services and sales</td><td>60,611</td><td>51,464</td><td>55,228</td><td>17.8</td><td>(6.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative</td><td>39,697</td><td>28,414</td><td>41,066</td><td>39.7</td><td>(30.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Abandonment of network assets</td><td>2,120</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>18,273</td><td>18,395</td><td>18,143</td><td>(0.7)</td><td>1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Total Operating Expenses</td><td>120,701</td><td>98,273</td><td>114,437</td><td>22.8</td><td>(14.1)</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Income</td><td>11,746</td><td>30,479</td><td>12,997</td><td>(61.5)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>3,613</td><td>3,940</td><td>3,444</td><td>(8.3)</td><td>14.4</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income of affiliates</td><td>175</td><td>642</td><td>752</td><td>(72.7)</td><td>(14.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Other income (expense) - net</td><td>1,652</td><td>596</td><td>134</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Income Before Income Taxes</td><td>9,960</td><td>27,777</td><td>10,439</td><td>(64.1)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income</td><td>6,518</td><td>18,553</td><td>7,539</td><td>(64.9)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 6,224</td><td>$ 18,249</td><td>$ 7,264</td><td>(65.9)%</td><td>—</td></tr></table>

## OVERVIEW

Operating income decreased $18,733, or 61.5%, in 2014 and increased $17,482 in 2013. Our operating margin was 8.9% in 2014, compared to 23.7% in 2013 and 10.2% in 2012. Operating income for 2014 decreased $15,453 due to a noncash actuarial loss of $7,869 related to pension and postemployment benefit plans and an actuarial gain of $7,584 in 2013. Operating income for 2014 also includes a noncash charge of $2,120 related to an abandonment of network assets, higher wireless equipment costs resulting from higher device sales, increased expenses supporting AT&T U-verse \( ^{\circledR} \)  (U-verse) subscriber growth, and continued declines in our traditional voice and data services. Partially offsetting these decreases were continued growth in wireless equipment revenue for device sales under our AT&T Next \( ^{SM} \)  (AT&T Next) program and increased revenues from U-verse and strategic business services, as well as the operating results of Leap Wireless International, Inc. (Leap) from March 13, 2014. Operating income for 2013 included a noncash actuarial gain of $7,584 related to pension and postemployment benefit plans in 2013 and operating income for 2012 included an actuarial loss of $9,994.

Service revenues decreased $815, or 0.7%, in 2014 and increased $746, or 0.6%, in 2013. The decrease in 2014 was primarily due to growth in our wireless Mobile Share Value plans, continued declines in our legacy wireline voice and data products and the October 2014 sale of our Connecticut operations (see Note 5), partially offset by strong revenues from U-verse, strategic business services and revenues from the acquisition of Leap. The revenue increase in 2013 was primarily due to growth in wireless data billings, reflecting the increasing percentage of wireless subscribers choosing smartphones and higher wireline revenues from U-verse residential customers and strategic business services. These increases were mostly



offset by continued declines in revenues from legacy
wireline voice and data services and the loss of revenues
resulting from the sale of our Advertising Solutions
segment in 2012.

The telecommunications industry is rapidly evolving from fixed location, voice-oriented services into an industry driven by customer demand for instantly available, data-based services (including video). We have been investing heavily to expand our broadband network and upgrade our wireless network to meet this demand. We have also launched new wireless offerings to give our customers additional choices for data and handset purchase plans.

Equipment revenues increased $4,510, or 47.5%, in 2014 and $572, or 6.4%, in 2013. Growth in equipment revenues reflected the continuing trend by our postpaid wireless subscribers to choose devices on installment purchase rather than the device subsidy model, which resulted in increased equipment revenue recognized for device sales. The revenue increase in 2013 was primarily due to growth in wireless equipment revenues, reflecting the increasing percentage of wireless subscribers choosing smartphones.

Cost of services and sales expenses increased $9,147, or 17.8%, in 2014 and decreased $3,764, or 6.8%, in 2013. The 2014 expense increased by $4,406 as a result of recording actuarial losses in 2014 and actuarial gains in 2013. Wireless handset sales and upgrades contributed to higher equipment costs and handset insurance costs in 2014. The increase also reflects higher wireless network costs and wireline costs attributable to U-verse content costs and subscriber growth and employee-related charges.

The 2013 expense decreased by $4,822 as a result of recording actuarial gains in 2013 and losses in 2012. Lower interconnect and long-distance expenses, lower costs associated with Universal Service Fund (USF) fees and the sale of our Advertising Solutions segment also contributed to expense declines in 2013. These decreases were partially offset by increased wireless equipment costs related to device sales and increased wireline costs attributable to growth in U-verse subscribers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $11,283, or 39.7%, in 2014 and decreased $12,652, or 30.8%, in 2013. The 2014 expense increased by $11,047 as a result of recording actuarial losses in 2014 and actuarial gains in 2013. Expense increases in 2014 also reflect higher selling and administrative expenses in our Wireless segment and gains on spectrum transactions in 2013. These increases were partially offset by lower employee-related costs and Wireless commissions expenses. The 2013 expense decreased by $12,757 as a result of recording actuarial gains in 2013 and actuarial losses in 2012. Expense reductions in 2013 also reflect lower employee-related Wireline costs, gains on spectrum transactions, lower financing-related costs associated with our pension and postretirement benefits (referred to as Pension/OPEB expenses) and the sale of our Advertising Solutions segment. These decreases were partially offset by increased charges for employee separations and higher selling and advertising expenses.

Abandonment of network assets In 2014, we recorded a noncash charge of $2,120 for the abandonment in place of certain network assets (see Note 6). During the fourth quarter of 2014, we completed a study of our network assets and determined that specific copper assets will not be necessary to support future network activity, due to declining customer demand for our legacy voice and data products and the transition of our networks to next generation IP-based technology.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $122, or 0.7%, in 2014 and increased $252, or 1.4%, in 2013. The 2014 expense decrease was primarily due to extending the estimated useful life of software, an increase in fully depreciated assets and lower amortization of intangibles for customer lists. These decreases were largely offset by ongoing capital spending for network upgrades and expansion and additional expense associated with the assets acquired from Leap.

The 2013 expense increase was primarily due to ongoing capital spending for network upgrades and expansion, partially offset by fully depreciated assets and lower amortization of intangibles for customer lists and the sale of our Advertising Solutions segment.

Interest expense decreased $327, or 8.3%, in 2014 and increased $496, or 14.4%, in 2013. The decrease in 2014 was primarily due to a $581 charge related to debt tender offers in 2013 and lower interest rates resulting from refinancing activity, partially offset by interest expense related to our December 2013 tower transaction (see Note 17), higher debt balances and charges associated with the early redemption of debt during 2014.

The increase in interest expense for 2013 was primarily due to a $581 charge related to our debt tender offers in 2013, partially offset by charges associated with early debt redemptions in 2012. Lower average interest rates offset higher average debt balances.



Equity in net income of affiliates decreased $467, or 72.7%, in 2014 and $110, or 14.6%, in 2013. The decrease in 2014 primarily resulted from the sale of our investment in América Móvil, S.A. de CV. (América Móvil) in June 2014 (see Note 5). Lower earnings from YP Holdings LLC (YP Holdings) and our investment in the mobile payment joint venture Softcard \( ^{™} \)  (Softcard) also contributed to lower equity in net income of affiliates in 2014. The decrease in 2013 was due to lower earnings from América Móvil and increased expenses in Softcard, partially offset by increased earnings from YP Holdings.

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>América Móvil</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$532</td><td>$686</td></tr><tr><td>YP Holdings</td><td>134</td><td>182</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>Softcard</td><td>(112)</td><td>(75)</td><td>(62)</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>(2)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in Net Income of Affiliates</td><td>$ 175</td><td>$642</td><td>$752</td></tr></table>

Other income (expense) – net We had other income of $1,652 in 2014, $596 in 2013 and $134 in 2012. Results for 2014 included a combined net gain of $1,541 on the sale of América Móvil shares, our Connecticut operations and other investments, interest and dividend income of $68, and leveraged lease income of $29.

Other income for 2013 included a net gain on the sale of América Móvil shares and other investments of $498, interest and dividend income of $68, and leveraged lease income of $26. Results for 2012 included net gains on the sale of investments of $74, interest and dividend income of $61, and leveraged lease income of $55. This income was partially offset by $57 of investment impairments.

Income tax expense decreased $5,782 in 2014 and increased $6,324 in 2013. The decrease in 2014 and increase in 2013 were primarily due to a change in income before income taxes. Our effective tax rate was 34.6% in 2014, 33.2% in 2013 and 27.8% in 2012 (see Note 11).

## Segment Results

Our segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services over various technology platforms and are managed accordingly. Our operating segment results presented in Note 4 and discussed below for each segment follow our internal management reporting. We analyze our operating segments based on segment income before income taxes. We make our capital allocation decisions based on the strategic needs of the business, needs of the network (wireless or wireline) providing services and to provide emerging services to our customers. Actuarial gains and losses from pension and other postemployment benefits, interest expense and other income (expense) – net, are managed only on a total company basis and are, accordingly, reflected only in consolidated results. Therefore, these items are not included in each segment's percentage of our total segment income. Each segment's percentage of total segment operating revenue and income calculations is derived from our segment results, and income percentage may total more than 100 percent due to losses in one or more segments. We have two reportable segments: (1) Wireless and (2) Wireline. Our operating results prior to May 9, 2012, also included our sold Advertising Solutions segment (see Note 5).

The Wireless segment accounted for approximately 56% of our 2014 total segment operating revenues as compared to 54% in 2013 and 75% of our 2014 total segment income as compared to 74% in 2013. This segment uses our nationwide network to provide consumer and business customers with wireless data and voice communications services. This segment included our portion of the results from our equity investment in Softcard.

The Wireline segment accounted for approximately 44% of our 2014 total segment operating revenues as compared to 46% in 2013 and 25% of our 2014 total segment income as compared to 26% in 2013. This segment uses our regional, national and global network to provide consumer and business customers with data and voice communications services, U-verse high speed Internet, video and VoIP services and managed networking to business customers.

The following sections discuss our operating results by segment. Operations and support expenses include certain network planning and engineering expenses; information technology; our repair technicians and repair services; property taxes; bad debt expense; advertising costs; sales and marketing functions, including customer service centers; real estate costs, including maintenance and utilities on all buildings; credit and collection functions; and corporate support costs, such as finance, legal, human resources and external affairs. Pension and postretirement service costs, net of amounts capitalized as part of construction labor, are also included to the extent that they are associated with employees who perform these functions.

We discuss capital expenditures for each segment in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”



## Wireless

## Segment Results

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="5">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$61,032</td><td>$61,552</td><td>$59,186</td><td>(0.8)%</td><td>4.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>12,960</td><td>8,347</td><td>7,577</td><td>55.3</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>Total Segment Operating Revenues</td><td>73,992</td><td>69,899</td><td>66,763</td><td>5.9</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operations and support</td><td>48,924</td><td>44,508</td><td>43,296</td><td>9.9</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>7,941</td><td>7,468</td><td>6,873</td><td>6.3</td><td>8.7</td></tr><tr><td>Total Segment Operating Expenses</td><td>56,865</td><td>51,976</td><td>50,169</td><td>9.4</td><td>3.6</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Operating Income</td><td>17,127</td><td>17,923</td><td>16,594</td><td>(4.4)</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in Net Income (Loss) of Affiliates</td><td>(112)</td><td>(75)</td><td>(62)</td><td>(49.3)</td><td>(21.0)</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Income</td><td>$17,015</td><td>$17,848</td><td>$16,532</td><td>(4.7)%</td><td>8.0%</td></tr></table>

The following table highlights other key measures of performance for the Wireless segment:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">(in 000s)</td><td rowspan="2">2014</td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Wireless Subscribers \( ^{1} \)</td><td>120,554</td><td>110,376</td><td>106,957</td><td>9.2%</td><td>3.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Postpaid smartphones</td><td>56,797</td><td>51,874</td><td>47,076</td><td>9.5</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>Postpaid feature phones and data-centric devices</td><td>19,134</td><td>20,764</td><td>23,421</td><td>(7.9)</td><td>(11.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Postpaid</td><td>75,931</td><td>72,638</td><td>70,497</td><td>4.5</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid</td><td>10,986</td><td>7,384</td><td>7,328</td><td>48.8</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>Reseller</td><td>13,855</td><td>14,028</td><td>14,875</td><td>(1.2)</td><td>(5.7)</td></tr><tr><td>Connected devices \( ^{2} \)</td><td>19,782</td><td>16,326</td><td>14,257</td><td>21.2</td><td>14.5</td></tr><tr><td>Total Wireless Subscribers</td><td>120,554</td><td>110,376</td><td>106,957</td><td>9.2</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>Net Additions \( ^{3} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Postpaid</td><td>3,290</td><td>1,776</td><td>1,438</td><td>85.2</td><td>23.5</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid</td><td>(775)</td><td>(13)</td><td>128</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Reseller</td><td>(346)</td><td>(1,074)</td><td>1,027</td><td>67.8</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Connected devices \( ^{2} \)</td><td>3,439</td><td>2,032</td><td>1,171</td><td>69.2</td><td>73.5</td></tr><tr><td>Net Subscriber Additions</td><td>5,608</td><td>2,721</td><td>3,764</td><td>106.1%</td><td>(27.7)%</td></tr><tr><td>Mobile Share connections</td><td>52,370</td><td>21,143</td><td>6,626</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Smartphones sold under our installment program during period</td><td>15,268</td><td>1,540</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total Churn \( ^{4} \)</td><td>1.45%</td><td>1.37%</td><td>1.35%</td><td>8 BP</td><td>2 BP</td></tr><tr><td>Postpaid Churn \( ^{4} \)</td><td>1.04%</td><td>1.06%</td><td>1.09%</td><td>(2) BP</td><td>(3) BP</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Represents 100% of AT&T Mobility wireless subscribers.

 \( ^{2} \)  Includes data-centric devices (e.g., monitoring devices and automobile systems). Excludes tablets, which are primarily included in postpaid.

 \( ^{3} \)  Excludes merger and acquisition-related additions during the period.

 \( ^{4} \)  Calculated by dividing the aggregate number of wireless subscribers who canceled service during a period divided by the total number of wireless subscribers at the beginning of that period. The churn rate for the period is equal to the average of the churn rate for each month of that period.

## Subscriber Relationships

As the wireless industry continues to mature, we believe that future wireless growth will increasingly depend on our ability to offer innovative services, plans and devices and a wireless network that has sufficient spectrum and capacity to support these innovations on as broad a geographic basis as possible. To attract and retain subscribers in a maturing market, we have launched a wide variety of plans, including Mobile Share and Mobile Share Value (Mobile Share) and AT&T Next. While we have historically focused on attracting and retaining postpaid subscribers, we have recently increased our focus on prepaid subscribers with our acquisition of Leap, which operates under the Cricket \( ^{®} \)  brand.

At December 31, 2014, we served 120.6 million subscribers (including Cricket subscribers from our March 13, 2014 acquisition of Leap, which were approximately 4.5 million at closing), an increase of 9.2% from the prior year. Our subscriber base consists primarily of postpaid accounts. Our prepaid services, which include results from services sold under the Cricket brand, are monthly prepaid services.



## ARPU

In 2014, our wireless business, and to some extent, the wireless industry, underwent a transformation in how subscribers purchase services and devices. The rapid expansion in the number of our subscribers who purchase equipment on installment and choose Mobile Share Value pricing, which offers lower prices for having multiple devices (including tablets) sharing services on one billing account, has highlighted the shortcomings of using the traditional metric of ARPU (average revenue per average wireless subscribers) to measure the economic value of a customer to a carrier. By relying only on monthly revenue, ARPU does not capture the total payments made by a customer. We believe that postpaid phone-only subscriber revenue per average user plus Next subscriber installment billings (postpaid phone-only ARPU plus AT&T Next) is a better representation of the monthly economic value per postpaid subscriber. For 2014, postpaid phone-only ARPU decreased 6.6% and postpaid phone-only ARPU plus AT&T Next decreased 2.6% compared to 2013. Postpaid phone-only ARPU increased 2.9% in 2013 as a result of a greater use of smartphones by our subscribers. AT&T Next, which launched later in 2013, did not have a significant impact prior to 2014.

## Churn

The effective management of subscriber churn is critical to our ability to maximize revenue growth and to maintain and improve margins. Total churn was higher in 2014 and 2013 due to increased competition and the expected pressure in prepaid with the transition of former Leap customers. Postpaid churn was lower for both 2014 and 2013.

## Postpaid

Postpaid subscribers increased 4.5% and 3.0% in 2014 and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2014, 83% of our postpaid phone subscriber base used smartphones, compared to 77% at December 31, 2013 and 70% at December 31, 2012. About 97% of our postpaid smartphone subscribers are on plans that provide for service on multiple devices at reduced rates, and such subscribers tend to have higher retention and lower churn rates. A growing percentage of our postpaid smartphone subscribers are on usage-based data plans, with approximately 85% on these plans as compared to 75% and 67%, respectively, in the prior two years. About 50% of our Mobile Share accounts have chosen plans with 10 gigabytes or higher. Device connections on our Mobile Share plans now represent almost 70% of our postpaid customer base. Such offerings are intended to encourage existing subscribers to upgrade their current services and/or add connected devices, attract subscribers from other providers and minimize subscriber churn.

As of December 31, 2014, approximately 90% of our postpaid smartphone subscribers use a 4G-capable device (i.e., a device that would operate on our LTE or HSPA+ network), and about 75% of our postpaid smartphone subscribers use an LTE device. Historically, our postpaid customers have signed two-year service contracts when they purchase subsidized handsets. However, through our Mobile Share plans, we have recently begun offering postpaid services at lower prices for those customers who either bring their own devices (BYOD) or participate in our AT&T Next program. Approximately 52% of all postpaid smartphone gross adds and upgrades during 2014 chose AT&T Next. We also experienced a sharp rise in the number of BYOD gross adds during 2014 to approximately 1,492,000, compared to approximately 400,000 in 2013. While BYOD customers do not generate equipment revenue, the lack of a device cost and subsidy helps improve our margins. We expect continued increases in our AT&T Next take rate as we have expanded the program to additional distributors.

Our AT&T Next program allows for postpaid subscribers to purchase certain devices in installments over a period of up to 30 months. Additionally, after a specified period of time, they also have the right to trade in the original device for a new device and have the remaining unpaid balance satisfied. For customers that elect these trade-in programs, at the time of the sale, we recognize equipment revenue for the amount of the customer receivable, net of the fair value of the trade-in right guarantee and imputed interest. A significant percentage of our customers on the AT&T Next program pay a lower monthly service charge, which results in lower service revenue recorded for these subscribers. In the second quarter of 2014, we began offering the AT&T Next program through other distributors and we expanded the offering to almost all of our remaining distributors during the third quarter, which further accelerated the impacts on service revenues.

## Prepaid

In March 2014, we completed our acquisition of Leap, which included approximately 4.5 million prepaid subscribers at closing. Since the acquisition, prepaid subscribers have decreased approximately 7.0% due in part to the expected transition of Cricket subscribers.

## Operating Results

Our Wireless segment operating income margin was 23.1% in 2014, compared to 25.6% in 2013 and 24.9% in 2012. Our Wireless segment operating income decreased $796, or 4.4%, in 2014 and increased $1,329, or 8.0%, in 2013. The decreases in operating margin and income in 2014 reflected the increasing popularity of Mobile Share plans, promotional activities and our continued investment in new services. The operating income and margin increase in 2013 reflected continuing data revenue growth and operating efficiencies, partially offset by high subsidies associated with growing smartphone sales.

Service revenues decreased $520, or 0.8%, in 2014 and increased $2,366, or 4.0%, in 2013. The decrease in 2014 was largely due to customers shifting to no-device-subsidy plans, which allow for discounted monthly service charges



under our Mobile Share plans. This decrease was largely offset by revenues from Cricket subscribers that were not included in our 2013 results. The increase in 2013 was primarily due to a higher number of subscribers using smartphones and data-centric devices. While we expect monthly service revenues to continue to be pressured as customers move to Mobile Share plans, we expect equipment revenues to increase for those subscribers who elect the AT&T Next program.

Equipment revenues increased $4,613, or 55.3%, in 2014 and $770, or 10.2%, in 2013. The increase in 2014 was primarily related to the increase in devices sold under our AT&T Next program and also the increase in smartphone sales and sales to Cricket customers. During the second quarter of 2014, with the launch of the AT&T Next program through other distributors, we began deferring the recognition of equipment revenue and costs on sales to distributors until the device is sold to the end subscriber and the trade-in right is conveyed. This lag in timing of the recognition of the sale resulted in lower revenue through these distributors beginning in the second quarter of 2014. The increase in 2013 was primarily driven by the increased number of smartphones as a percentage of total device sales to postpaid subscribers.

Operations and support expenses increased $4,416, or 9.9%, in 2014 and $1,212, or 2.8%, in 2013. The increase in 2014, which includes the incremental costs related to integrating Leap, was primarily due to the following:

• Equipment costs increased $2,664, reflecting the sales of more expensive smartphones. Equipment costs also include Cricket and Alltel subscriber integration charges, which we expect will continue into 2015 as we complete the migration of those subscribers to our network.

• Selling (other than commissions) and administrative expenses increased $1,060 due primarily to increases of: $261 in sales and marketing expense; $279 in professional, administrative and legal costs; $252 in customer service and retention cost; and $125 in bad debt expense resulting from higher volumes of equipment installment sales.

• Network system costs increased $578 due to increased lease fees, higher maintenance and energy costs resulting from the increase in the number of cell sites and expenses related to our network enhancement efforts. These increases were partially offset by lower interconnect costs resulting from our ongoing network transition to more efficient Ethernet/IP-based technologies.

• Handset insurance cost increased $407 due to an increase in the cost of replacement phones.

Partially offsetting these increases were lower commission expenses of $486, which were primarily due to lower average commission rates paid under the AT&T Next program as well as a decrease in national equipment activation credits. These decreases are partially offset by an increase due to Cricket, postpaid gross activations and upgrades.

The increase in 2013 was primarily due to the following:

• Equipment costs increased $817, reflecting sales of more expensive smartphones, partially offset by the overall decline in upgrade activity and total device sales.

• Selling expenses (other than commissions) and administrative expenses increased $712 due primarily to a $265 increase in employee-related costs, a $246 increase in advertising costs, $187 increase in information technology costs in conjunction with ongoing support systems development, and $107 increase in nonemployee-related costs, partially offset by an $84 decrease in bad debt expense.

• Commission expenses increased $59 due to a year-over-year increase in smartphone sales as a percentage of total device sales, partially offset by the overall decline in handset upgrade activity and total device sales.

Partially offsetting these increases were the following:

• Long-distance costs decreased $130 due to third-party credits and lower usage costs.

• USF fees decreased $104 primarily due to USF rate decreases, which are offset by lower USF revenues.

• Network system costs decreased $77 primarily due to lower interconnect costs partially offset by higher network traffic, personnel-related network support costs and cell site related costs in conjunction with our network enhancement efforts.

• Incollect roaming fees decreased $73 primarily due to rate declines and lower roaming use associated with the integration of previously acquired subscribers into our network.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $473, or 6.3%, in 2014 and $595, or 8.7%, in 2013. In 2014, depreciation expense increased $494, or 6.8%, primarily due to ongoing capital spending for network upgrades and expansions and the acquisition of Leap partially offset by certain network assets becoming fully depreciated and extending the estimated useful life of software. Amortization expense decreased $21, or 9.6%, primarily due to lower amortization of intangibles for customer lists related to acquisitions.

Depreciation expense increased $865, or 13.5%, in 2013 primarily due to ongoing capital spending for network upgrades and expansions partially offset by certain network assets becoming fully depreciated. Amortization expense decreased $270, or 55.3%, in 2013 primarily due to lower amortization of intangibles for customer lists related to acquisitions.



## Wireline

## Segment Results

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="5">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$57,405</td><td>$57,700</td><td>$58,271</td><td>(0.5)%</td><td>(1.0)%</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>1,020</td><td>1,114</td><td>1,302</td><td>(8.4)</td><td>(14.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Segment Operating Revenues</td><td>58,425</td><td>58,814</td><td>59,573</td><td>(0.7)</td><td>(1.3)</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operations and support</td><td>42,471</td><td>41,638</td><td>41,207</td><td>2.0</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>10,323</td><td>10,907</td><td>11,123</td><td>(5.4)</td><td>(1.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Segment Operating Expenses</td><td>52,794</td><td>52,545</td><td>52,330</td><td>0.5</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Operating Income</td><td>5,631</td><td>6,269</td><td>7,243</td><td>(10.2)</td><td>(13.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in Net Income (Loss) of Affiliates</td><td>—</td><td>2</td><td>(1)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Income</td><td>$ 5,631</td><td>$ 6,271</td><td>$ 7,242</td><td>(10.2)%</td><td>(13.4)%</td></tr></table>

## Supplemental Information

## Wireline Broadband, Telephone and Video Connections Summary

Our broadband, switched access lines and other services provided at December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 are shown below and trends are addressed throughout the following segment discussion.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>(in 000s)</td><td>2014 \( ^{3} \)</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U-verse high speed Internet</td><td>12,205</td><td>10,375</td><td>7,717</td><td>17.6%</td></tr><tr><td>DSL and Other Broadband Connections</td><td>3,823</td><td>6,050</td><td>8,673</td><td>(36.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Wireline Broadband Connections \( ^{1} \)</td><td>16,028</td><td>16,425</td><td>16,390</td><td>(2.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Total U-verse Video Connections</td><td>5,943</td><td>5,460</td><td>4,536</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>Retail Consumer Switched Access Lines</td><td>9,243</td><td>12,403</td><td>15,707</td><td>(25.5)</td></tr><tr><td>U-verse Consumer VoIP connections</td><td>4,759</td><td>3,849</td><td>2,905</td><td>23.6</td></tr><tr><td>Total Retail Consumer Voice Connections</td><td>14,002</td><td>16,252</td><td>18,612</td><td>(13.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Switched Access Lines</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Retail consumer</td><td>9,243</td><td>12,403</td><td>15,707</td><td>(25.5)</td></tr><tr><td>Retail business</td><td>8,939</td><td>10,363</td><td>11,483</td><td>(13.7)</td></tr><tr><td>Retail Subtotal</td><td>18,182</td><td>22,766</td><td>27,190</td><td>(20.1)</td></tr><tr><td>Wholesale</td><td>1,514</td><td>1,627</td><td>1,776</td><td>(6.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Switched Access Lines \( ^{2} \)</td><td>19,896</td><td>24,639</td><td>29,279</td><td>(19.2)%</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Total wireline broadband connections include DSL, U-verse high speed Internet and satellite broadband.

 \( ^{2} \)  Total switched access lines include access lines provided to national mass markets and private payphone service providers of 200 at December 31, 2014, 246 at

December 31, 2013, and 313 at December 31, 2012.

 \( ^{3} \)  Connections reflect the sale of our Connecticut wireline operations in 2014.

## Operating Results

Our Wireline segment operating income margin was 9.6% in 2014, compared to 10.7% in 2013 and 12.2% in 2012. Our Wireline segment operating income decreased $638, or 10.2%, in 2014 and $974, or 13.4%, in 2013. The decrease in operating margins and income was driven primarily by continued revenue decreases from our legacy voice and data products and increased U-verse content costs, partially offset by increased revenues from our U-verse and IP-based strategic business services. As we transition from basic legacy voice and data services to sophisticated, high-speed, IP-based alternatives, we expect continued growth in our more advanced IP data products while traditional data and DSL revenues continue to decline.

Service revenues decreased $295, or 0.5%, in 2014 and $571, or 1.0%, in 2013. Lower service revenues from business customers (which include integration, government-related and outsourcing services) and the continued decline in revenues from legacy services that we no longer actively market were largely offset by higher service revenues from our residential customers.



## Business

Service revenues from business customers decreased $848, or 2.5%, in 2014 and $891, or 2.5%, in 2013. Service revenue declines reflect the fourth-quarter sale of our Connecticut operations. In 2014 and 2013, the revenue decreases were due to lower long-distance and voice revenues of $681 and $721 and declines of $1,229 and $1,012 in traditional data revenues, which include circuit-based and packet-switched data services. The decreases were primarily due to lower demand as customers continue to shift to our most advanced IP-based offerings, such as Ethernet, VPN, U-verse high speed Internet access and managed Internet services, or to other service providers. The lower traditional service revenues were largely offset by higher demand for our next generation services. Strategic business service revenues, which include VPNs, Ethernet, hosting, IP conferencing, VoIP, Ethernet-access to Managed Internet Service (EaMIS), security services, and U-verse services provided to business customers increased $1,220, or 14.4%, in 2014 and $1,105, or 15.0%, in 2013. In 2014 and in 2013, revenue from VPN increased $359 and $361, Ethernet increased $338 and $310, U-verse services increased $173 and $143 and EaMIS increased $163 and $126.

## Consumer

Service revenues from residential customers increased $603, or 2.7%, in 2014 and $548, or 2.5%, in 2013. The increases were driven by higher IP data revenue reflecting increased U-verse penetration, customer additions, and migration from our legacy voice and DSL services. In 2014 and 2013, U-verse revenue from consumers increased $1,315 and $1,289 for high-speed Internet access, $1,024 and $995 for video and $384 and $282 for voice. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $729 and $616 in DSL revenue as customers continue to shift to our high-speed Internet access offerings and $1,418 and $1,379 in traditional voice revenues.

Equipment revenues decreased $94, or 8.4%, in 2014, and $188, or 14.4%, in 2013. Our equipment revenues are mainly attributable to our business customers.

## Advertising Solutions

## Segment Results

Operations and support expenses increased $833, or 2.0%, in 2014 and $431, or 1.0%, in 2013. Operations and support expenses consist of costs incurred to provide our products and services, including costs of operating and maintaining our networks and personnel costs, such as compensation and benefits.

The 2014 increase in expenses was primarily due to increased cost of sales of $621, related to U-verse content fees; higher nonemployee-related expense of $362 in conjunction with information technology enhancements, overall growth of our U-verse services and expenses related to network enhancements; higher Universal Service Fund (USF) fees of $157, which are offset by higher USF revenues; and higher materials and energy costs of $102. These increases were partially offset by lower employee-related expense of $396, reflecting ongoing workforce reduction initiatives.

The 2013 increase was primarily due to increased cost of sales of $680, primarily related to U-verse related expenses; higher advertising expenses of $155; and higher contract services of $125. These increases were partially offset by lower employee-related expense of $437, reflecting workforce reduction initiatives, and USF fees of $116, which are offset by lower USF revenues.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $584, or 5.4%, in 2014 and $216, or 1.9%, in 2013. Depreciation decreased $441, or 4.2%, in 2014 primarily due to extending the estimated useful life of software, partially offset by ongoing capital spending for network upgrades and expansion. Amortization expense decreased $143, or 33.3%, in 2014 primarily due to fully amortized customer lists associated with acquisitions.

The 2013 decrease was primarily related to lower amortization of intangibles for customer lists associated with acquisitions.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="5">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Total Segment Operating Revenues</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 1,049</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operations and support</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>773</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>106</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Total Segment Operating Expenses</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>879</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Income</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 170</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table>

On May 8, 2012, we completed the sale of our Advertising Solutions segment (see Note 5).



## Supplemental Operating Information

As a supplemental discussion of our operating results, we are providing a view of our AT&T Business Solutions (ABS) business revenues which includes both wireless and wireline. This combined view of ABS presents a complete revenue profile of the entire customer relationship, and underscores the growing importance of mobile solutions to serving our business customers.

## AT&T Business Solutions

## Operating Revenues

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">2014</td><td rowspan="2">2013</td><td rowspan="2">2012</td><td colspan="2">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>2014 vs. 2013</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>ABS operating revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Wireless</td><td>$37,278</td><td>$33,608</td><td>$29,571</td><td>10.9%</td><td>13.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Wireline</td><td>34,594</td><td>35,510</td><td>36,567</td><td>(2.6)</td><td>(2.9)</td></tr><tr><td>Total ABS Operating Revenues</td><td>$71,872</td><td>$69,118</td><td>$66,138</td><td>4.0%</td><td>4.5%</td></tr></table>

## ABS Operating Revenues

Our ABS operating revenues increased $2,754, or 4.0%, in 2014 and $2,980, or 4.5%, in 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014, mobile solutions represented almost 52% of total ABS revenues, up from 49% in 2013 and 45% in 2012.

Wireless revenues increased $3,670, or 10.9%, in 2014 and $4,037, or 13.7%, in 2013. Growth in ABS postpaid subscribers of 11.0% and 10.2% contributed to total revenue growth in 2014 and 2013, respectively. ABS wireless revenues consist of services provided to business as well as revenue from wireless customers who pay lower negotiated rates through their employers. Revenue increases in 2014 reflect the impact of equipment installment plans, which resulted in equipment revenue growth of 78.1% compared to prior-year growth of 20.9%, and service revenue growth of 1.9% compared to prior-year growth of 12.7%.

Wireline revenues decreased $916, or 2.6%, in 2014 and $1,057, or 2.9%, in 2013. The decline in revenues reflects migrations to alternative technologies, increasing price competition and sustained economic pressure. These declines were partially offset by growth in our strategic business services, including the continued success of our VPN and Cloud services. While our wholesale revenues continue to be negatively impacted by increasing competition and our strategic decisions to change offerings, we are experiencing lower revenue declines than in prior years for services provided to small and medium-sized businesses, and for 2014, we have grown revenues for services provided to large national and multinational enterprises.

## OPERATING ENVIRONMENT AND TRENDS OF THE BUSINESS

2015 Revenue Trends We expect our operating environment in 2015 to be challenging as we face competition, especially in the wireless area, slow economic conditions and a regulatory environment that appears increasingly unfriendly to investment in broadband services. Despite these challenges, we expect our consolidated operating revenues in 2015 to grow, driven by continuing growth in our wireless data and IP-related wireline data services, including U-verse. We expect our primary driver of growth to be wireless data services from smartphones, tablets and other services (such as wireless home services and mobile navigation, including automobile-based services). We also expect that robust competition in the wireless industry will continue to pressure service revenue and ARPU. Our AT&T Next program is expected to generate strong equipment revenue, which has the corresponding impact of lower service revenues. We expect that all our major customer categories will continue to increase their use of Internet-based broadband/data services. We expect continuing declines in traditional access lines and in traditional telephone service revenues. Where available, our U-verse services have proved effective in stemming customer losses, and we expect to continue to expand our U-verse service offerings in 2015. We expect our pending acquisitions of DIRECTV and NII Holdings Inc. (NII), upon completion, and our recently completed acquisition of GSF Telecom Holdings, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (GSF Telecom) wireless properties in Mexico to increase revenues, although we expect to incur significant integration costs in the same period.

2015 Expense Trends We expect expanding wireless, wireline and consolidated operating income margins in 2015 as growth in AT&T Next is reducing subsidized handset costs over time and we have essentially completed Project Velocity IP (Project VIP). Expenses related to growth areas



of our business, including wireless data, U-verse and strategic business services, will apply some pressure to our operating income margin.

Market Conditions During 2014, ongoing slow recovery in the general economy continued to negatively affect our customers. Our business and residential customers have continued to purchase lower levels of traditional wireline services and are increasingly price sensitive in selecting offerings. We expect continued pressure on pricing during 2015 as we respond to this intense competition, especially in the wireless business.

Included on our consolidated balance sheets are assets held by benefit plans for the payment of future benefits. Our pension plans are subject to funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). In September 2013, we made a voluntary contribution of a preferred equity interest in AT&T Mobility II LLC to the trust used to pay pension benefits. The trust is entitled to receive cumulative annual cash distributions of $560, which will result in a $560 contribution during 2015. In addition, we will contribute $175 no later than the due date for our federal income tax return for 2014. We do not have significant additional contribution requirements to our pension plans for 2015. However, a weakness in the equity, fixed income and real asset markets could require us in future years to make contributions to the pension plans in order to maintain minimum funding requirements as established by ERISA. Investment returns on these assets depend largely on trends in the U.S. securities markets and the U.S. economy. In addition, our policy of recognizing actuarial gains and losses related to our pension and other postretirement plans in the period in which they arise subjects us to earnings volatility caused by changes in market conditions. Changes in our discount rate, which are tied to changes in the bond market, and changes in the performance of equity markets, may have significant impacts on the valuation of our pension and other postretirement obligations at the end of 2015 (see “Accounting Policies and Estimates”).

## OPERATING ENVIRONMENT OVERVIEW

AT&T subsidiaries operating within the United States are subject to federal and state regulatory authorities. AT&T subsidiaries operating outside the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of national and supranational regulatory authorities in the markets where service is provided, and regulation is generally limited to operational licensing authority for the provision of services to enterprise customers.

In the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Telecom Act), Congress established a national policy framework intended to bring the benefits of competition and investment in advanced telecommunications facilities and services to all Americans by opening all telecommunications markets to competition and reducing or eliminating regulatory burdens that harm consumer welfare. However, since the Telecom Act was passed, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and some state regulatory commissions have maintained or expanded certain regulatory requirements that were imposed decades ago on our traditional wireline subsidiaries when they operated as legal monopolies. We are pursuing, at both the state and federal levels, additional legislative and regulatory measures to reduce regulatory burdens that are no longer appropriate in a competitive telecommunications market and that inhibit our ability to compete more effectively and offer services wanted and needed by our customers, including initiatives to transition services from traditional networks to all IP-based networks. At the same time, we also seek to ensure that legacy regulations are not extended to broadband or wireless services, which are subject to vigorous competition. In November 2014, the president of the United States issued a statement urging the FCC to reclassify both fixed and mobile consumer broadband Internet access services as telecommunications services, subject to comprehensive regulation under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 (the Act). Although the president also recommended that the FCC refrain from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband service, this proposal, if adopted and upheld, would significantly expand the FCC’s existing authority to regulate the provision of fixed and mobile broadband Internet access services. The FCC now appears poised to adopt this proposal, along with expanding the net neutrality rules into mobile broadband Internet access services. In addition, the FCC may assert jurisdiction over Internet interconnection arrangements, which until now have been unregulated. If these proposals are adopted, they could have a material adverse impact on our fixed and mobile broadband services and operating results.

In addition, states representing a majority of our local service access lines have adopted legislation that enables new video entrants to acquire a single statewide or state-approved franchise (as opposed to the need to acquire hundreds or even thousands of municipal-approved franchises) to offer competitive video services. We also are supporting efforts to update and improve regulatory treatment for retail services. Regulatory reform and passage of legislation is uncertain and depends on many factors.

We provide wireless services in robustly competitive markets, but those services are subject to substantial and increasing governmental regulation. Wireless communications providers must obtain licenses from the FCC to provide communications services at specified spectrum frequencies within specified geographic areas and must comply with the FCC rules and policies governing the use of the spectrum. While wireless communications providers’ prices and service offerings are generally not subject to state regulation, states sometimes attempt to regulate or legislate various aspects of wireless services, such as in the area of consumer protection.



The FCC has recognized that the explosive growth of bandwidth-intensive wireless data services requires the U.S. Government to make more spectrum available. In February 2012, Congress set forth specific spectrum blocks to be auctioned and licensed by February 2015 (the "AWS-3 Auction"), and also authorized the FCC to conduct an "incentive auction," to make available for wireless broadband use certain spectrum that is currently used by broadcast television licensees (the "600 MHz Auction"). We participated in the AWS-3 Auction, which began in October 2014 and closed in January 2015 (see "Other Business Matters"). The FCC recently announced that the 600 MHz Auction has been postponed until 2016.

In May 2014, in a separate proceeding, the FCC issued an order revising its policies governing mobile spectrum holdings. The FCC rejected the imposition of caps on the amount of spectrum any carrier could acquire, retaining its case-by-case review policy. Moreover, it increased the amount of spectrum that could be acquired before exceeding an aggregation “screen” that would automatically trigger closer scrutiny of a proposed transaction. On the other hand, it indicated that it will separately consider an acquisition of “low band” spectrum that exceeds one-third of the available low band spectrum as presumptively harmful to competition. In addition, the FCC imposed limits on certain bidders in the 600 MHz Auction, including AT&T, restricting them from bidding on up to 40 percent of the available spectrum in the incentive auction in markets that cover as much as 70-80 percent of the U.S. population. On balance, the order and the new spectrum screen should allow AT&T to obtain additional spectrum to meet our customers’ needs, but because AT&T uses more “low band” spectrum in its network than some other national carriers, the separate consideration of low band spectrum acquisitions might affect AT&T’s ability to expand capacity in these bands (“low band” spectrum has better propagation characteristics than “high band” spectrum). Also, a competitor has filed a petition asking the FCC to increase the percentage of spectrum for which we would be prohibited from bidding in the incentive auction. That petition is pending. We seek to ensure that we have the opportunity, through the auction process and otherwise, to obtain the spectrum we need to provide our customers with high-quality service in the future.

## Expected Growth Areas

We expect our wireless services and wireline IP-data products to remain the most significant growth portions of our business and have also discussed trends affecting the segments in which we report results for these products (see “Wireless Segment Results” and “Wireline Segment Results”). Over the next few years, we expect our growth to come from IP-based data services, including video, used by our wireless and wireline customers. We also expect that upon completion and integration of our strategic agreements with DIRECTV, GSF Telecom and NII (see “Other Business Matters”) our revenue mix will be greatly different and much more diversified. We will be able to provide integrated services to diverse groups of customers both in the U.S. and internationally and on different technological platforms, including wireless, satellite and wireline. Upon completion of these acquisitions, we expect our largest revenue stream to come from business customers, followed by U.S. consumer video and broadband, U.S. consumer mobility and then international mobility and video. Whether, or the extent to which, growth in these areas will offset declines in other areas of our business is not known.

Wireless We expect to deliver continued revenue growth in the coming years. We are in a period of rapid growth in wireless data usage and believe that there are substantial opportunities available for next-generation converged services that combine wireless, broadband, voice and video. For example, we launched agreements with many automobile manufacturers for vehicle-embedded security and entertainment services.

In the United States, we now cover all major metropolitan areas and more than 300 million people with our LTE technology. We also provide 4G coverage using another technology (HSPA+), and when combined with our upgraded backhaul network, we are able to enhance our network capabilities and provide superior mobile broadband speeds for data and video services. Our wireless network also relies on other GSM digital transmission technologies for 3G and 2G data communications. As of December 31, 2014, we served more than 120 million subscribers.

As the wireless industry continues to mature, we believe that future wireless growth will increasingly depend on our ability to offer innovative data services and a wireless network that has sufficient spectrum and capacity to support these innovations. We are facing significant spectrum and capacity constraints on our wireless network in certain markets. We expect such constraints to increase and expand to additional markets in the coming years. While we are continuing to invest significant capital in expanding our network capacity, our capacity constraints could affect the quality of existing voice and data services and our ability to launch new, advanced wireless broadband services, unless we are able to obtain more spectrum. Any long-term spectrum solution will require that the FCC make additional spectrum available to the wireless industry to meet the expanding needs of our subscribers. We will continue to attempt to address spectrum and capacity constraints on a market-by-market basis. To that end, we closed nearly 50 deals to acquire spectrum and wireless operations during 2014. In addition, we also acquired Leap in March 2014, which enabled us to expand our spectrum position in a cost-effective manner. In January 2015, we submitted winning bids for 251 Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) spectrum licenses for a near-nationwide contiguous block of high-quality AWS spectrum in the AWS-3 Auction (FCC Auction 97) for $18,189.



In January 2015, we completed the acquisition of GSF Telecom and announced an agreement to acquire NII, another Mexican wireless provider. These two acquisitions will give us a GSM network covering both the U.S. and Mexico and enable our customers to use wireless services without roaming on other companies' networks. We believe this seamless access will prove attractive to customers and provide a significant growth opportunity.

U-verse Services During 2014, we continued to expand our offerings of U-verse high speed Internet and TV services. As part of Project VIP, we announced a goal to expand our IP-broadband service to approximately 57 million customer locations and we achieved that goal. As of December 31, 2014, we had 12.5 million total U-verse subscribers (high-speed Internet and video), including 12.2 million Internet and 5.9 million video subscribers (subscribers to both services are only counted once in the total and exclude those customers who were part of the sold Connecticut operations).

We believe that our U-verse TV service is a “video service” under the Federal Communications Act. However, some cable providers and municipalities have claimed that certain IP services should be treated as a traditional cable service and therefore subject to the applicable state and local cable regulation. Petitions have been filed at the FCC alleging that the manner in which we provision “public, educational and governmental” (PEG) programming over our U-verse TV service conflicts with federal law. If courts having jurisdiction where we have significant deployments of our U-verse services were to decide that federal, state and/or local cable regulation were applicable to our U-verse services, or if the FCC, state agencies or the courts were to rule that we must deliver PEG programming in a manner substantially different from the way we do today or in ways that are inconsistent with our current network architecture, it could have a material adverse effect on the cost and extent of our U-verse offerings.

## REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

Set forth below is a summary of the most significant regulatory proceedings that directly affected our operations during 2014. Industry-wide regulatory developments are discussed above in Operating Environment Overview. While these issues may apply only to certain subsidiaries, the words “we,” “AT&T” and “our” are used to simplify the discussion. The following discussions are intended as a condensed summary of the issues rather than as a comprehensive legal analysis and description of all of these specific issues.

International Regulation Our subsidiaries operating outside the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of regulatory authorities in the market where service is provided. Our licensing, compliance and advocacy initiatives in foreign countries primarily enable the provision of enterprise (i.e., large-business) services. However, with our January 2015 acquisition of GSF Telecom, we have subsidiaries providing wireless services to businesses and consumers that are subject to regulatory authority in Mexico. AT&T is engaged in multiple efforts with foreign regulators to open markets to competition, reduce network costs, foster conditions favorable to investment, and increase our scope of fully authorized network services and products.

Federal Regulation A summary of significant 2014 federal regulatory developments follows.

Intercarrier Compensation/Universal Service In October 2011, the FCC adopted an order fundamentally overhauling its high-cost universal service program, through which it disburses approximately $4,500 annually, and its existing intercarrier compensation (ICC) rules, which govern payments between carriers for the exchange of traffic. The order adopted rules to address immediately certain practices that artificially increase ICC payments, as well as other practices to avoid such payments. The order also established a new ICC regime that will result in the elimination of virtually all terminating switched access charges and reciprocal compensation payments over a six-year transition. In the order, the FCC also repurposed its high-cost universal service program to encourage providers to deploy broadband facilities in unserved areas. To accomplish this goal, the FCC is transitioning support amounts disbursed through its existing high-cost program to its new Connect America Fund (CAF). In 2013, the FCC awarded us approximately $100 in new CAF funding to deploy broadband in unserved areas. In May 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied all challenges to the universal service and intercarrier compensation rules adopted in the 2011 order. It subsequently denied two petitions for rehearing of discrete aspects of that decision. The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners has filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the United States Supreme Court to review this decision. We do not expect the FCC’s rules to have a material impact on our operating results.

Net Neutrality In January 2014, the D.C. Circuit released its decision on Verizon’s appeal of the FCC’s Net Neutrality rules. Those rules prohibited providers of fixed, mass market Internet access service from blocking access to lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices. The rules prohibited providers of mobile broadband Internet access service from blocking consumers from accessing lawful websites or applications that compete with the provider’s own voice or video telephony services. The rules also imposed transparency requirements on providers of both fixed and mobile broadband Internet access services, requiring public disclosure of information regarding network management practices, performance and commercial terms



of their service offerings. In addition, the rules prohibited providers of fixed (but not mobile) broadband Internet access service from unreasonably discriminating in their transmission of lawful network traffic.

In its decision, the court found the FCC had authority under section 706 of the Act (which directs the FCC and state commissions to promote broadband deployment) to adopt rules designed to preserve the open Internet, but vacated and remanded the antidiscrimination and no-blocking rules on the ground that they impermissibly imposed common carrier regulation on broadband Internet access service. The court held that, having declared broadband Internet access services to be information services, the FCC could not regulate them as telecommunications services. The court did not vacate the transparency rules.

The court’s finding that section 706 provides the FCC independent authority to adopt rules to promote broadband deployment appears to give the FCC broad authority to regulate the Internet and, more generally, IP-based services, provided the FCC finds such regulation promotes deployment of broadband infrastructure. In addition, because section 706(a) grants authority to both the FCC and the states to adopt rules to promote broadband deployment, states could attempt to rely on that provision to regulate broadband services, although the states’ authority to do so appears to be narrower than the FCC’s. In May 2014, the FCC released a notice of proposed rulemaking in response to the D.C. Circuit’s January decision that also asks wide-ranging questions that appear to re-open settled issues. Importantly, the FCC asks whether it has sufficient authority under section 706 to reestablish protections against discrimination and blocking on broadband Internet access services or whether it needs to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service to achieve its regulatory goals. In November 2014, the president issued a statement urging the FCC to reclassify both fixed and mobile consumer broadband Internet access services as telecommunications services, subject to comprehensive regulation under Title II of the Act. Although the president also recommended that the FCC refrain from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband service, this proposal, if adopted and upheld, would significantly expand the FCC’s existing authority to regulate the provision of fixed and mobile broadband Internet access services. The FCC now appears poised to adopt this proposal, along with expanding the net neutrality rules into mobile broadband Internet access services. In addition, the FCC may assert jurisdiction over Internet interconnection arrangements, which until now have been unregulated. In addition, if the states were to impose additional regulation and/or taxes on the Internet or broadband services, it could have a material adverse impact on our broadband services and operating results.
Spectrum In May 2014, the FCC issued an order revising its policies governing mobile spectrum holdings. The FCC rejected the imposition of caps on the amount of spectrum any carrier could acquire, retaining its case-by-case review policy. Moreover, it increased the amount of spectrum that could be acquired before exceeding an aggregation “screen” that would automatically trigger closer scrutiny of a proposed transaction. On the other hand, it indicated that it will separately consider an acquisition of “low band” spectrum that exceeds one-third of the available low band spectrum as presumptively harmful to competition. In addition, the FCC imposed limits on certain bidders in the 600 MHz Auction, including AT&T, restricting them from bidding on up to 40 percent of the available spectrum in the incentive auction in markets that cover as much as 70-80 percent of the U.S. population. On balance, the order and the new spectrum screen should allow AT&T to obtain additional spectrum to meet our customers’ needs, but because AT&T uses more “low band” spectrum in its network than some other national carriers, the separate consideration of low band spectrum acquisitions might affect AT&T’s ability to expand capacity in these bands. Also, a competitor has filed a petition asking the FCC to increase the percentage of spectrum for which we would be prohibited from bidding in the incentive auction. That petition is pending. We seek to ensure that we have the opportunity, through the auction process and otherwise, to obtain the spectrum we need to provide our customers with high-quality service in the future.

## COMPETITION

Competition continues to increase for telecommunications and information services. Technological advances have expanded the types and uses of services and products available. In addition, lack of or a reduced level of regulation of comparable alternatives (e.g., cable, wireless and VoIP providers) has lowered costs for these alternative communications service providers. As a result, we face heightened competition as well as some new opportunities in significant portions of our business, including our 2015 acquisition of a Mexican wireless provider.

## Wireless

We face substantial and increasing competition in all aspects of our wireless business. Under current FCC rules, multiple licensees, who provide wireless services on the cellular, PCS, Advanced Wireless Services, 700 MHz and other spectrum bands, may operate in each of our service areas, which results in the potential presence of multiple competitors. Our competitors include brands such as Verizon Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile/Metro PCS, a larger number of regional providers of cellular, PCS and other wireless communications services and resellers of those services. In addition, we face competition from providers



who offer voice, text messaging and other services as applications on data networks. More than 98 percent of the U.S. population lives in areas with at least three mobile telephone operators, and almost 94 percent of the population lives in areas with at least four competing carriers. We may experience significant competition from companies that provide similar services using other communications technologies and services. While some of these technologies and services are now operational, others are being developed or may be developed. We compete for customers based principally on service/device offerings, price, call quality, coverage area and customer service.

## Wireline

Our wireline subsidiaries will face continued competitive pressure in 2015 from multiple providers, including wireless, cable and other VoIP providers, interexchange carriers and resellers. In addition, the desire for high-speed data on demand, including video, and lingering economic pressures are continuing to lead customers to terminate their traditional local wireline service and use our or competitors' wireless and Internet-based services. In most markets, we compete for customers, often on pricing of bundled services, with large cable companies, such as Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications Inc. and Time Warner Cable Inc., for high-speed Internet, video and voice services and other smaller telecommunications companies for both long-distance and local services.

Our wireline subsidiaries generally remain subject to regulation for wholesale services by state regulatory commissions for intrastate services and by the FCC for interstate services. Under the Telecom Act, companies seeking to interconnect to our wireline subsidiaries' networks and exchange local calls enter into interconnection agreements with us. Any unresolved issues in negotiating those agreements are subject to arbitration before the appropriate state commission. These agreements (whether fully agreed-upon or arbitrated) are then subject to review and approval by the appropriate state commission.

Our wireline subsidiaries operate under state-specific forms of regulation for retail services that were either legislatively enacted or authorized by the appropriate state regulatory commission. Most states deregulate the competitive services; impose price caps for some services where the prices for these services are not tied to the cost of providing the services or to rate-of-return requirements; or adopt a regulatory framework that incorporates deregulation and price caps. Some states may impose minimum customer service standards with required payments if we fail to meet the standards.

We continue to lose access lines due to competitors (e.g., wireless, cable and VoIP providers) who can provide comparable services at lower prices because they are not subject to traditional telephone industry regulation (or the extent of regulation is in dispute), utilize different technologies, or promote a different business model (such as advertising based). In response to these competitive pressures, for several years we have utilized a bundling strategy that rewards customers who consolidate their services (e.g., long-distance telephone, high-speed Internet, wireless and video) with us. We continue to focus on bundling wireline and wireless services, including combined packages of minutes and video service through our U-verse service. We will continue to develop innovative products that capitalize on our IP-based network.

Additionally, we provide local, domestic intrastate and interstate, international wholesale networking capacity, and switched services to other service providers, primarily large Internet Service Providers using the largest class of nationwide Internet networks (Internet backbone), wireless carriers, Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, regional phone Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, cable companies and systems integrators. These services are subject to additional competitive pressures from the development of new technologies and the increased availability of domestic and international transmission capacity. The introduction of new products and service offerings and increasing satellite, wireless, fiber-optic and cable transmission capacity for services similar to those provided by us continues to provide competitive pressures. We face a number of international competitors, including Orange Business Services, British Telecom, Singapore Telecommunications Limited and Verizon Communications Inc., as well as competition from a number of large systems integrators, such as HP Enterprise Services.

## ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND STANDARDS

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Because of the size of the financial statement line items they relate to or the extent of judgment required by our management, some of our accounting policies and estimates have a more significant impact on our consolidated financial statements than others. The following policies are presented in the order in which the topics appear in our consolidated statements of income.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We record expense to maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that result from the failure or inability of our customers to make required payments. When determining the allowance, we consider the probability of recoverability based on past experience, taking into account current collection trends as well as general economic factors, including bankruptcy rates. Credit risks are assessed based on historical write-offs, net of recoveries, as well as an analysis of the aged accounts receivable balances with reserves generally increasing as the receivable ages. Accounts receivable may be fully reserved for when specific collection issues are known to exist, such as pending bankruptcy or catastrophes.



The analysis of receivables is performed monthly, and the allowances for doubtful accounts are adjusted through expense accordingly. A 10% change in the amounts estimated to be uncollectible would result in a change in the provision for uncollectible accounts of approximately $100.

Deferred Purchase Price We offer our customers the option to purchase certain wireless devices in installments over a period of up to 30 months, with the right to trade in the original equipment for a new device, within a set period, and have the remaining unpaid balance satisfied. In conjunction with this plan, we have entered into uncommitted agreements with various banks and purchasers that allow for the transfer of these installment receivables for cash and additional consideration upon settlement of the receivables, referred to as the deferred purchase price. The deferred purchase price is initially recorded at estimated fair value, which is based on remaining installment payments expected to be collected, adjusted by the expected timing and value of device trade-ins, and is subsequently carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The estimated value of the device trade-ins takes into account prices offered to us by independent third parties that contemplate changes in value after the launch of a device model. A 10% decrease in the estimated trade-in value would result in a decrease in the carrying value of our deferred purchase price of approximately $40. A one-month acceleration in the estimated timing of trade-in would result in a decrease in the carrying value of our deferred purchase price of approximately $90. We review and update our assumptions used in determining the deferred purchase price on a quarterly basis. (See Note 16)

Pension and Postretirement Benefits Our actuarial estimates of retiree benefit expense and the associated significant weighted-average assumptions are discussed in Note 12. Our assumed discount rate for pension and postretirement benefits of 4.30% and 4.20%, respectively, at December 31, 2014, reflects the hypothetical rate at which the projected benefit obligations could be effectively settled or paid out to participants. We determined our discount rate based on a range of factors, including a yield curve composed of the rates of return on several hundred high-quality, fixed income corporate bonds available at the measurement date and the related expected duration for the obligations. These bonds were all rated at least Aa3 or AA- by one of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations, denominated in U.S. dollars, and neither callable, convertible nor index linked. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we decreased our pension discount rate by 0.70%, resulting in an increase in our pension plan benefit obligation of $4,854 and decreased our postretirement discount rate 0.80%, resulting in an increase in our postretirement benefit obligation of $2,786. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we increased our discount rate by 0.70%, resulting in a decrease in our pension plan benefit obligation of $4,533 and a decrease in our postretirement benefit obligation of $3,161. The 2014 increase of $7,640 in our combined pension and postretirement obligations caused by declines in our discount rates essentially reversed the decrease in our benefit obligation attributable to the discount rate change in 2013.

Our expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is 7.75% for 2015 and 2014. Our expected long-term rate of return on postretirement plan assets will be adjusted to 5.75% for 2015 from 7.75% for 2014. Our expected return on plan assets is calculated using the actual fair value of plan assets. If all other factors were to remain unchanged, we expect that a 0.50% decrease in the expected long-term rate of return would cause 2015 combined pension and postretirement cost to increase $250, which under our accounting policy would be recognized in the current year as part of our fourth-quarter remeasurement of our retiree benefit plans. In 2014, the actual return on our combined pension and postretirement plan assets was 8.8%, resulting in an actuarial gain of $566.

We recognize gains and losses on pension and postretirement plan assets and obligations immediately in our operating results. These gains and losses are generally measured annually as of December 31 and accordingly will normally be recorded during the fourth quarter, unless an earlier remeasurement is required. Should actual experience differ from actuarial assumptions, the projected pension benefit obligation and net pension cost and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and postretirement benefit cost would be affected in future years. Note 12 also discusses the effects of certain changes in assumptions related to medical trend rates on retiree healthcare costs.

Depreciation Our depreciation of assets, including use of composite group depreciation and estimates of useful lives, is described in Notes 1 and 6. We assign useful lives based on periodic studies of actual asset lives. Changes in those lives with significant impact on the financial statements must be disclosed. During 2014, we completed studies evaluating the periods that we were utilizing our software assets. As of April 1 and July 1, 2014, we extended our estimated useful lives for capitalized non-network and network software, respectively, to five years to better reflect the estimated periods during which these assets will remain in service and to align with the estimated useful lives used in



the industry. This change in accounting estimate decreased depreciation expense and impacted 2014 net income $513. Prior to 2014, capitalized software costs were primarily amortized over a three-year period.

If all other factors were to remain unchanged, we expect that a one-year increase in the useful lives of our plant in service would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $2,313 in our 2014 depreciation expense and that a one-year decrease would have resulted in an increase of approximately $3,417 in our 2014 depreciation expense.

Asset Valuations and Impairments We account for acquisitions using the acquisition method. We allocate the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The estimated fair values of intangible assets acquired are based on the expected discounted cash flows of the identified customer relationships, patents, trade names and FCC licenses. In determining the future cash flows, we consider demand, competition and other economic factors.

Customer relationships, which are finite-lived intangible assets, are primarily amortized using the sum-of-the-months-digits method of amortization over the period in which those relationships are expected to contribute to our future cash flows. The sum-of-the-months-digits method is a process of allocation and reflects our belief that we expect greater revenue generation from these customer relationships during the earlier periods after acquisition. Amortization of other intangibles, including patents and certain trade names, is determined using the straight-line method of amortization over the expected remaining useful lives or specified contractual terms.

Goodwill, wireless FCC licenses and trade names are not amortized but tested annually for impairment. We conduct our impairment tests as of October 1. We test goodwill on a reporting unit basis, and our reporting units coincide with our segments. If, due to changes in how we manage the business, we move a portion of a reporting unit to another reporting unit, we determine the amount of goodwill to reallocate to the new reporting unit based on the relative fair value of the portion of the business moved and the portion of the business remaining in the reporting unit. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step involves determining the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing that measurement to the book value. If the fair value exceeds the book value, then no further testing is required. If the fair value is less than the book value (i.e., an indication of impairment exists), then we perform the second step. In the second step, we determine the fair values of all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including those that may not be currently recorded. The difference between the sum of all of those fair values and the overall reporting unit's fair value is a new implied goodwill amount, which we compare to the recorded goodwill. If implied goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, then we record an impairment of the recorded goodwill. The amount of this impairment may be more or less than the difference between the overall fair value and book value of the reporting unit. It may even be zero if the fair values of other assets are less than their book values.

As shown in Note 7, all of our goodwill resides in the Wireless and Wireline segments. For each of those segments, we assess their fair values using an income approach (also known as a discounted cash flow) and a market multiple approach. The income approach utilizes a 10-year cash flow projection with a perpetuity value discounted using an appropriate Weighted Average Cost of Capital rate for each reporting unit. The market multiple approach uses a multiple of a company's Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, and Depreciation and Amortization expenses (EBITDA). We determined the multiples of the publicly traded companies whose services are comparable to those offered by the segment and then calculated a weighted-average of those multiples. Using those weighted averages, we then calculated fair values for each of those segments. In 2014, the calculated fair value of the reporting unit exceeded book value in all circumstances and no additional testing was necessary. In the event of a 10% drop in the fair values of the reporting units, the fair values would have still exceeded the book values of the reporting units and additional testing would still have not been necessary.

Wireless FCC licenses are tested for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with the management of the business on a national scope. As in prior years, we performed our test of the fair values of FCC licenses using a discounted cash flow model (the Greenfield Approach). The Greenfield Approach assumes a company initially owns only the wireless FCC licenses, and then makes investments required to build an operation comparable to the one that currently utilizes the licenses. We utilized a 17-year discrete period to isolate cash flows attributable to the licenses, including modeling the hypothetical build-out. The projected cash flows are based on certain financial factors, including revenue growth rates, EBITDA margins and churn rates. For impairment testing purposes, we assumed wireless revenue growth to trend down from our 2014 growth rate of 5.9% to a long-term growth rate that reflects expected long-term inflation trends. We assumed our



churn rates will increase in 2015 from our rate of 1.45% in 2014, in line with expected trends in the industry but at a rate comparable with industry-leading churn. EBITDA service margins were assumed to continue to trend to at least 40% annually.

This model then incorporates cash flow assumptions regarding investment in the network, development of distribution channels and the subscriber base, and other inputs for making the business operational. We based the assumptions, which underlie the development of the network, subscriber base and other critical inputs of the discounted cash flow model, on a combination of average marketplace participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. We also used operating metrics such as capital investment per subscriber, acquisition costs per subscriber, minutes of use per subscriber, etc., to develop the projected cash flows. Since we included the cash flows associated with these other inputs in the annual cash flow projections, the present value of the unlevered free cash flows of the segment, after investment in the network, subscribers, etc., is attributable to the wireless FCC licenses. The terminal value of the segment, which incorporates an assumed sustainable growth rate, is also discounted and is likewise attributed to the licenses. We used a discount rate of 8.5%, based on the optimal long-term capital structure of a market participant and its associated cost of debt and equity, to calculate the present value of the projected cash flows. This discount rate is also consistent with rates we use to calculate the present value of the projected cash flows of licenses acquired from third parties.

If either the projected rate of long-term growth of cash flows or revenues declined by 1%, or if the discount rate increased by 1%, the fair values of the wireless FCC licenses, while less than currently projected, would still be higher than the book value of the licenses. The fair value of the licenses exceeded the book value by more than 25%.

We review customer relationships and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable over the remaining life of the asset or asset group. To determine that the asset is recoverable, we verify that the expected undiscounted future cash flows directly related to that asset exceed its book value.

We evaluate our investments to determine whether market declines are temporary and accordingly reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, or other-than-temporary and recorded as an expense in “Other income (expense) – net” in the consolidated statements of income. This evaluation is based on the length of time and the severity of decline in the investment’s value. In 2014 and 2012, we identified an immaterial other-than-temporary decline in the value of equity method investments and various cost investments.

Income Taxes Our estimates of income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred assets and liabilities are shown in Note 11 and reflect our assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the financial statements, giving consideration to both timing and probability of these estimates. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law or the final review of our tax returns by federal, state or foreign tax authorities.

We use our judgment to determine whether it is more likely than not that we will sustain positions that we have taken on tax returns and, if so, the amount of benefit to initially recognize within our financial statements. We regularly review our uncertain tax positions and adjust our unrecognized tax benefits (UTBs) in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law. These adjustments to our UTBs may affect our income tax expense. Settlement of uncertain tax positions may require use of our cash.

## New Accounting Standards

See Note 1 for a discussion of recently issued or adopted accounting standards.

## OTHER BUSINESS MATTERS

DIRECTV Acquisition In May 2014, we announced a merger agreement to acquire DIRECTV in a stock-and-cash transaction for ninety-five dollars per share of DIRECTV's common stock, or approximately $48,500 at the date of announcement. As of December 31, 2014, DIRECTV had approximately $16,177 in net debt. Each DIRECTV shareholder will receive cash of $28.50 per share and $66.50 per share in our stock subject to a collar such that DIRECTV shareholders will receive 1.905 AT&T shares if our average stock price is below $34.90 per share at closing and 1.724 AT&T shares if our average stock price is above $38.58 at closing. If our average stock price (calculated in accordance with the merger agreement with DIRECTV) is between $34.90 and $38.58 at closing, then DIRECTV shareholders will receive a number of shares between 1.724 and 1.905, equal to $66.50 in value. DIRECTV is a premier pay TV provider in the United States and Latin America, with a high-quality customer base, the best selection of programming, the best technology for delivering and viewing high-quality video on any device and the best customer satisfaction among major U.S. cable and satellite TV providers.



The merger agreement was adopted by DIRECTV's stockholders on September 25, 2014 and the transaction remains subject to review by the FCC and the Department of Justice and to other closing conditions. It is also a condition that all necessary consents by certain foreign governmental entities have been obtained and are in full force and effect. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2015. The merger agreement provides certain mutual termination rights for us and DIRECTV, including the right of either party to terminate the agreement if the merger is not consummated by May 18, 2015, subject to extension in certain cases to a date no later than November 13, 2015. Either party may also terminate the agreement if an order permanently restraining, enjoining, or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the merger becomes final and nonappealable. In October 2014, DIRECTV and the National Football League renewed their agreement for the "NFL Sunday Ticket" service substantially on the terms discussed between AT&T and DIRECTV, satisfying one of the conditions to closing the merger. Under certain circumstances relating to a competing transaction, DIRECTV may be required to pay a termination fee to us in connection with or following a termination of the agreement.

Based on synergies we expect to realize with the acquisition, we have also committed to the following upon closing of the transaction: (1) expanding or enhancing our deployment of both wireline and fixed wireless broadband to at least 15 million customer locations across 48 states, with most of the locations in underserved rural areas, (2) adhering to the FCC's Open Internet protections established in 2010 for three years after closing, regardless of whether the FCC re-establishes such protections for other industry participants following the D.C. Circuit's vacating of those rules, (3) for three years after closing, offering standalone retail broadband Internet access service at reasonable market-based prices, including a service of at least 6 Mbps down (where feasible) at guaranteed prices, in areas where we offer wireline broadband service today, and (4) offering, for three years after closing, standalone DIRECTV satellite video service at nationwide package prices that do not differ between customers in AT&T's wireline footprint and customers outside our current 21-state wireline footprint.

NII Holdings Inc. Acquisition On January 26, 2015, we entered into an agreement with NII to acquire its wireless business in Mexico for $1,875, less any outstanding net debt held by the business at closing, in a transaction pursuant to Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Upon closing, we will acquire companies, which operate under the name Nextel Mexico, and approximately 3.0 million subscribers.

GSF Telecom Acquisition On January 16, 2015, we completed our acquisition of 100 percent of the stock of Mexican wireless company GSF Telecom for $2,500, less net debt at closing, which was approximately $700. GSF Telecom offers service under both the Iusacell and Unefon brand names in Mexico with a network that covers about 70 percent of Mexico’s population of approximately 120 million.

Spectrum Acquisitions In September 2014, we completed our acquisition of 49 AWS spectrum licenses, covering nearly 50 million people in 14 states, from Aloha Partners II, L.P., for approximately $847 in cash. In January 2015, we submitted winning bids for 251 AWS spectrum licenses, comprised of 42 G Block licenses, 37 H Block licenses, 58 I Block licenses, and 114 J Block licenses, in the AWS-3 Auction (FCC Auction 97) for $18,189 (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”). We will cover approximately 96 percent of the U.S. population with high-value contiguous AWS-3 spectrum. We also intend to bid at least $9,000 in connection with the 600 MHz auction, provided there is sufficient spectrum available in the auction to give us a viable path to at least a 2x10 MHz nationwide spectrum footprint.

Connecticut Wireline Disposition In October 2014, we sold our incumbent local exchange operations in Connecticut to Frontier Communications Corporation for $2,018 and recorded a pre-tax gain of $147.

Federal Trade Commission Litigation In October 2014, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a civil suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against AT&T Mobility, LLC seeking injunctive relief and unspecified money damages under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The FTC’s allegations concern AT&T’s Maximum Bit Rate (MBR) program, which temporarily reduces the download speeds of a small portion of our legacy Unlimited Data Plan customers each month. MBR is an industry-standard practice that is authorized by the FCC and designed to affect only the most data-intensive applications (such as video streaming). Texts, emails, tweets, social media posts, Internet browsing, and many other applications are typically unaffected. Contrary to the FTC’s allegations, which we vigorously dispute, our MBR program is permitted by our customer contracts, was fully disclosed in advance to our Unlimited Data Plan customers, and was implemented to protect the network for the benefit of all customers. In addition, we believe that the FTC has no jurisdiction to bring this action and have moved to dismiss the litigation on that basis.

Labor Contracts As of January 31, 2015, we employed approximately 253,000 persons. Approximately 53 percent of our employees are represented by the Communications Workers of America, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers or other unions. Contracts covering approximately 41,000 non-Mobility employees will expire during 2015, including approximately 12,000 traditional wireline employees in our five-state Midwest region and



24,000 in our nine-state Southeast region. After expiration of the current agreements, work stoppages or labor disruptions may occur in the absence of new contracts or other agreements being reached.

Environmental We are subject from time to time to judicial and administrative proceedings brought by various governmental authorities under federal, state or local environmental laws. We reference in our Forms 10-Q and 10-K certain environmental proceedings that could result in monetary sanctions (exclusive of interest and costs) of one hundred thousand dollars or more. However, we do not believe that any of those currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

## LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We had $8,603 in cash and cash equivalents available at December 31, 2014. Cash and cash equivalents included cash of $1,257 and money market funds and other cash equivalents of $7,346. We also had $1,890 in short-term investments, which we included in “Other current assets” on our consolidated balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents increased $5,264 since December 31, 2013. During 2014, cash inflows were primarily provided by cash receipts from operations and long-term debt issuances, with additional cash from the monetization of our investment in América Móvil, the sale of our Connecticut wireline operations and other assets. These inflows were largely offset by cash used to meet the needs of the business, including but not limited to, payment of operating expenses, funding capital expenditures, dividends to stockholders, debt redemptions, the acquisition of wireless spectrum and operations and stock repurchases. We discuss many of these factors in detail below.

## Cash Provided by or Used in Operating Activities

During 2014, cash provided by operating activities was $31,338, compared to $34,796 in 2013. Lower operating cash flows in 2014 were primarily due to wireless device financing related to AT&T Next, which results in cash collection over the installment period instead of at the time of sale, increased inventory levels and retirement benefit funding. In June 2014, we entered into uncommitted agreements to periodically sell certain equipment installment receivables for cash and future consideration (see Note 16 for details). Proceeds from the sale of equipment installment receivables, which we included in our operating cash flows, and the timing of working capital payments partially offset the decline in operating cash flows.

During 2013, cash provided by operating activities was $34,796 compared to $39,176 in 2012. Lower operating cash flows in 2013 were due to higher cash tax payments and the timing of working capital payments and wireless device financing related to AT&T Next.

## Cash Used in or Provided by Investing Activities

During 2014, cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of:

• $21,199 in capital expenditures, excluding interest during construction.

• $234 in interest during construction.

• $3,141 for the acquisitions of wireless spectrum licenses (including a refundable deposit with the FCC for the AWS-3 Auction), Leap and other operations.

• $1,890 in short-term investments, consisting of time deposits greater than 90 days.

During 2014, cash provided by investing activities consisted primarily of:

• $5,885 from the sale of our remaining shares in América Móvil.

• $2,018 from the sale of our Connecticut operations.

• $220 from the sale of various properties.

Virtually all of our capital expenditures are spent on our wireless and wireline networks, our U-verse services and support systems for our communications services. Capital expenditures, excluding interest during construction, increased $255 from 2013. Our Wireless segment represented 53% of our total spending and increased 2% in 2014. The Wireline segment, which includes U-verse services, represented 47% of the total capital expenditures and was flat in 2014, primarily reflecting our implementation of Project VIP, which we began in 2013 and substantially completed in 2014.

We expect our 2015 capital expenditures for our existing businesses to be in the $18,000 range. Due to our completion of Project VIP, we anticipate lower capital spending in our Wireless and Wireline segments in 2015. The amount of capital investment is influenced by demand for services and products, capacity needs and network enhancements. We are also focused on ensuring merger commitments are met and our expenditures may also be influenced by regulatory considerations. We expect to support our business and spectrum acquisitions with a combination of debt issuances, cash from operations, and asset sales.

On January 16, 2015, we purchased GSF Telecom for $1,875 in cash, and on January 26, 2015, we also agreed to acquire Nextel Mexico for approximately $1,875, less the outstanding net debt of the business at closing. We anticipate the transaction will close in mid-2015, subject to regulatory review and approval.

In January 2015, we submitted winning bids for 251 AWS spectrum licenses in the AWS-3 Auction for $18,189. We provided the FCC an initial down payment of $921 in October 2014 and paid the remaining down payment amount of $2,717 on February 13, 2015. We will pay the balance of $14,551 on or before March 2, 2015.



## Cash Used in or Provided by Financing Activities

We paid dividends of $9,552 in 2014, $9,696 in 2013, and $10,241 in 2012, primarily reflecting the decline in shares outstanding due to our repurchase activity, partially offset by dividend rate increases. In December 2014, our Board of Directors approved a 2.2% increase in the quarterly dividend from $0.46 to $0.47 per share. This follows a 2.2% dividend increase approved by our Board in December 2013. Dividends declared by our Board of Directors totaled $1.85 per share in 2014, $1.81 per share in 2013, and $1.77 per share in 2012. Our dividend policy considers the expectations and requirements of stockholders, capital funding requirements of AT&T and long-term growth opportunities. It is our intent to provide the financial flexibility to allow our Board of Directors to consider dividend growth and to recommend an increase in dividends to be paid in future periods. All dividends remain subject to declaration by our Board of Directors.

In 2014, we continued to take advantage of lower market interest rates and undertook several activities related to our long-term debt which caused our weighted average interest rate of our entire long-term debt portfolio, including the impact of derivatives, to decrease from 4.4% at December 31, 2013 to 4.2% at December 31, 2014. We had $81,632 of total notes and debentures outstanding (see Note 9) at December 31, 2014, which included Euro, British pound sterling, Swiss Franc and Canadian dollar denominated debt of approximately $24,655.

During 2014, we received net proceeds of $15,926 from the issuance of $16,013 in long-term debt in various markets, with an average weighted maturity of approximately 13 years and a weighted average coupon of 2.4%. Debt issued included:

• March 2014 issuance of $1,100 of 2.300% global notes due 2019, $1,000 of 3.900% global notes due 2024 and $400 of floating rate global notes due 2019. The floating rate for the notes is based upon the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), reset quarterly, plus 67 basis points.

• March 2014 issuance of $500 of floating rate global notes due 2017. The floating rate for the notes is based upon the three-month LIBOR, reset quarterly, plus 42 basis points.

• May 2014 draw of $750 on a private financing agreement with Export Development Canada due 2017. The agreement is designed to encourage the purchase of Canadian-sourced equipment. The agreement contains terms similar to that provided under our revolving credit arrangements, discussed below.

• June 2014 issuance of $2,000 of 4.800% global notes due 2044.
• June 2014 issuance of €1,600 (equivalent to $2,181 when issued) of 2.400% global notes due 2024 and €500 (equivalent to $681 when issued) of 3.375% global notes due 2034.

• November 2014 issuance of $1,295 of 4.700% global notes due 2044.

• November 2014 issuance of CHF 450 of 0.500% senior fixed-rate notes due 2019, CHF 450 of 1.375% senior fixed-rate notes due 2024 and CHF 150 of 1.875% senior fixed-rate notes due 2030 (together, equivalent to $1,089 when issued).

• December 2014 issuance of €1,500 of 1.450% global notes due 2022, €800 of 2.600% global notes due 2029 and €1,500 of floating rate global notes due 2019 (together, equivalent to $4,767 when issued).

• December 2014 draw of $250 on a private financing agreement with U.S. Bank National Association.

During 2014, we redeemed $10,400 in debt, primarily consisting of the following repayments:

• March 2014 redemption of $1,814 of Cricket Communications, Inc. term loans and approximately $38 of 4.500% Leap convertible senior notes (Leap senior notes) in connection with the Leap acquisition.

• April 2014 redemption of Cricket Communications, Inc. 7.750% senior notes with a face value of $1,600 in connection with the Leap acquisition.

• July 2014 redemption of $4,393 of debt consisting of all of the outstanding BellSouth 5.200% notes due 2014, AT&T 0.875% global notes due 2015, AT&T 5.625% global notes due 2016, and BellSouth 5.200% notes due 2016 as well as $750 in principal amount of the outstanding AT&T 2.500% global notes due 2015.

• July 2014 redemption of the remaining $211 of Leap senior notes in connection with the Leap acquisition.

• September 2014 redemption of $2,250 of SBC Communications Inc. 5.100% global notes due 2014.

On January 29, 2015, we issued $2,619 of 4.600% global notes due 2045.

At December 31, 2014, we had $6,056 of debt maturing within one year, substantially all of which was related to long-term debt issuances. Debt maturing within one year includes the following notes that may be put back to us by the holders:

• $1,000 of annual put reset securities issued by BellSouth Corporation that may be put back to us each April until maturity in 2021.

• An accreting zero-coupon note that may be redeemed each May until maturity in 2022. If the zero-coupon note (issued for principal of $500 in 2007) is held to maturity, the redemption amount will be $1,030.



Since the first quarter of 2012, we have bought back shares of AT&T common stock under three previous 300 million share repurchase authorizations approved by our Board of Directors in 2010, 2012 and 2013 (see Note 14 for details). In March 2014, our Board of Directors approved a fourth authorization to repurchase 300 million shares of our common stock, which, along with the 2013 authorization, has no expiration date. During 2012, we completed the 2010 authorization and repurchased 371 million shares for $12,752 under the 2010 and 2012 authorizations. During 2013, we completed the 2012 authorization and repurchased 366 million shares for $13,028 under the 2012 and 2013 authorizations. During 2014, we repurchased approximately 48 million shares for $1,617 under the 2013 authorization. At the end of 2014, we had approximately 415 million shares remaining from the 2013 and 2014 authorizations. Upon completing our acquisition of DIRECTV, our priority will be to use free cash flow (operating cash flows less construction and capital expenditures) after dividends to pay down debt.

The emphasis of our 2015 financing activities will be the issuance of debt, in part to fund our business acquisitions, the payment of dividends, subject to approval by our Board of Directors, the repayment of debt and share repurchases. We plan to fund our financing uses of cash through a combination of cash from operations, debt issuances and asset sales. The timing and mix of debt issuance will be guided by credit market conditions and interest rate trends.

## Credit Facilities

We have a $5,000 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that expires in December 2018 (the “December 2018 Facility”) and a $3,000 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that expires in December 2017 (the “December 2017 Facility”). In addition, on January 21, 2015, AT&T entered into a $9,155 credit agreement (the “Syndicated Credit Agreement”) containing (i) a $6,286 term loan facility (the “Tranche A Facility”) and (ii) a $2,869 term loan facility (the “Tranche B Facility”), with certain investment and commercial banks and Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (“Mizuho”), as administrative agent. On that date, AT&T also entered into a $2,000 18-month credit agreement (the “18-Month Credit Agreement”) with Mizuho as initial lender and agent.

## Revolving Credit Agreements

In the event advances are made under either the December 2018 Facility or the December 2017 Facility, those advances would be used for general corporate purposes. Advances are not conditioned on the absence of a material adverse change. All advances must be repaid no later than the date on which lenders are no longer obligated to make any advances under each agreement. Under each agreement, we can terminate, in whole or in part, amounts committed by the lenders in excess of any outstanding advances; however, we cannot reinstate any such terminated commitments. At December 31, 2014, we had no advances outstanding under either agreement and were in compliance with all covenants under each agreement.

Advances under both agreements would bear interest, at AT&T's option, either:

• at a variable annual rate equal to (1) the highest of: (a) the base (or prime) rate of the bank affiliate of Citibank, N.A. which is serving as administrative agent under the Agreement, (b) 0.50% per annum above the Federal funds rate, and (c) the LIBOR applicable to U.S. dollars for a period of one month plus 1.00% per annum, plus (2) an applicable margin, as set forth in the Agreement (Applicable Margin; each such advance, a Base Rate Advance); or

• at a rate equal to: (i) the LIBOR for a period of one, two, three or six months, as applicable, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (each such advance, a Eurodollar Rate Advance).

The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under both agreements will equal 0.565%, 0.680%, or 0.910% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under both agreements will be 0%.

Under each agreement, AT&T will pay a facility fee of 0.060%, 0.070% or 0.090% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating, of the amount of lender commitments.

Both agreements contain covenants that are customary for an issuer with an investment grade senior debt credit rating. Among other covenants, both agreements provide that AT&T will maintain, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, a debt-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other modifications described in the agreements) ratio of not more than 3-to-1, for the four quarters then ended.

Events of default under both agreements are customary for facilities of this nature and result in the acceleration or permit the lenders to accelerate, as applicable, required repayment and would increase the Applicable Margin by 2.00% per annum.

The obligations of the lenders under the December 2017 Facility to provide advances will terminate on December 11, 2017, unless prior to that date either: (i) AT&T, and if applicable, a Co-Borrower, reduce to $0 the commitments of the lenders, or (ii) certain events of default occur. We and lenders representing more than 50% of the facility amount may agree to extend their commitments for two one-year periods beyond the December 11, 2017, termination date, under certain circumstances. We also can request the lenders to further increase their commitments (i.e., raise the available credit) up to an additional $2,000 provided no event of default has occurred. The same



provisions apply to the December 2018 Facility except that the applicable date is December 11, 2018.

## The Syndicated Credit Agreement

In the event advances are made under the Syndicated Credit Agreement, those advances would be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisition related payments. Amounts borrowed under the Tranche A Facility will be due and payable on the third anniversary of funding. Amounts borrowed under the Tranche B Facility will be subject to amortization from the third anniversary of funding, with twenty-five percent of the aggregate principal amount thereof being payable prior to the fifth anniversary thereof, and all remaining principal amount due and payable on such fifth anniversary. The obligations of the lenders under the Syndicated Credit Agreement to provide advances extend from the effective date of the agreement to a termination date of March 21, 2015, unless prior to that date either: (i) AT&T reduces to $0 the commitments of the lenders under the Syndicated Credit Agreement or (ii) certain events of default occur.

Advances would bear interest, at AT&T's option, either:

• at a variable annual rate equal to: (1) the highest of (a) Mizuho's publicly-announced prime rate, (b) 0.50% per annum above the Federal funds rate, and (c) the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited Settlement Rate applicable to dollars for a period of one month plus 1.00%, plus (2) an applicable margin, as set forth in the Syndicated Credit Agreement (Applicable Margin) (each such Advance, a Base Rate Advance); or

• at a rate equal to: (i) the LIBOR for deposits in dollars (adjusted upwards to reflect any bank reserve costs) for a period of three or six months, as applicable, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (each such Advance, a Eurodollar Rate Advance).

The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche A Facility will equal 1.000%, 1.125% or 1.250% per annum depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under the Tranche A Facility will be equal to the relevant Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche A Facility minus 1.00%.

The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche B Facility will equal 1.125%, 1.250% or 1.375% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under the Tranche B Facility will be equal to the relevant Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche B Facility minus 1.00%.

The Syndicated Credit Agreement contains covenants that are customary for an issuer with an investment grade senior debt credit rating. Among other things, the Syndicated Credit Agreement requires us to maintain debt-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other modifications described in the Syndicated Credit Agreement) ratio of not more than 3-to-1, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter.

Events of default are customary for an agreement of this nature and result in the acceleration or permit the lenders to accelerate, as applicable, required payment and which would increase the Applicable Margin by 2.00% per annum.

## The 18-Month Credit Agreement

As with the Syndicated Credit Agreement, advances under the 18-Month Credit Agreement would be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisition related payments. Amounts borrowed under the 18-Month Credit Agreement will be due and payable on the date that is 18 months after the funding. The obligations of the lender under the 18-Month Credit Agreement to provide advances extend from the effective date of the agreement to a termination date of March 21, 2015, unless prior to that date either: (i) AT&T reduces to $0 the commitment of the lender under the 18-Month Credit Agreement or (ii) certain events of default occur.

Advances would bear interest, at AT&T's option, either:

• at a variable annual rate equal to: (1) the highest of (a) Mizuho's publicly-announced prime rate, (b) 0.50% per annum above the Federal funds rate, and (c) the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited Settlement Rate applicable to dollars for a period of one month plus 1.00%, plus (2) an applicable margin, as set forth in the 18-Month Credit Agreement (Applicable Margin) (each such Advance, a Base Rate Advance); or

• at a rate equal to: (i) the LIBOR for deposits in dollars (adjusted upwards to reflect any bank reserve costs) for a period of one, two, three or six months, as applicable, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (each such Advance, a Eurodollar Rate Advance).

The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the 18-Month Credit Agreement will equal 0.800%, 0.900% or 1.000% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under the 18-Month Credit Agreement will be 0%.

In the event that AT&T's unsecured senior long-term debt ratings are split by S&P, Moody's and Fitch Ratings, then the Applicable Margin will be determined by the highest rating, unless the lowest of such ratings is more than one level below the highest of such ratings, in which case the pricing will be the rating that is one level above the lowest of such ratings.

The 18-Month Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants and events of default equivalent to those contained in the Syndicated Credit Agreement.



## Other

Our total capital consists of debt (long-term debt and debt maturing within one year) and stockholders' equity. Our capital structure does not include debt issued by our equity method investments. At December 31, 2014, our debt ratio was 48.6%, compared to 45.0% at December 31, 2013, and 43.0% at December 31, 2012. The debt ratio is affected by the same factors that affect total capital, and reflects our recent debt issuances and stock repurchases. Total capital increased $2,721 in 2014 compared to an increase of $3,731 in 2013. The 2014 capital increase was primarily due to increases in debt balances and increases in accumulated other comprehensive income related to prior service credits resulting from amendments to our postretirement benefit plans, partially offset by a decrease in net income, due to actuarial losses on our pension and postretirement benefit plans and a charge for our abandonment of certain network assets; and additional stock repurchases.

A significant amount of our cash outflows are related to tax items and benefits paid for current and former employees. Total taxes incurred, collected and remitted by AT&T during 2014, 2013, and 2012 were $20,870, $21,004 and $19,703. These taxes include income, franchise, property, sales, excise, payroll, gross receipts and various other taxes and fees. Total health and welfare benefits provided to certain active and retired employees and their dependents totaled $5,113 in 2014, with $1,498 paid from plan assets. Of those benefits, $4,168 related to medical and prescription drug benefits. During 2014, we paid $6,543 of pension benefits out of plan assets.

During 2014, we also received approximately $10,650 from monetization of various assets. A majority of that cash was attributable to the sale of our investment in América Móvil and the sale of our Connecticut wireline operations (see Note 5) as well as our sales of certain equipment installment receivables and real estate holdings. We plan to continue to explore monetization opportunities in 2015.

In September 2013, we made a voluntary contribution of a preferred equity interest in AT&T Mobility II LLC (Mobility), the holding company for our wireless business, to the trust used to pay pension benefits under our qualified pension plans. In September 2013, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published a proposed exemption that authorized retroactive approval of this voluntary contribution. In July 2014, the DOL published in the Federal Register their final retroactive approval of our voluntary contribution.

The preferred equity interest had a value of $9,021 as of December 31, 2014, and $9,104 on the contribution date, does not have any voting rights and has a liquidation value of $8,000. The trust is entitled to receive cumulative cash distributions of $560 per annum, which will be distributed quarterly in equal amounts. We distributed $560 to the trust in 2014. So long as we make the distributions, the terms of the preferred equity interest will not impose any limitations on our ability to declare a dividend, or repurchase shares. At the time of the contribution of the preferred equity interest, we made an additional cash contribution of $175 and have agreed to annual cash contributions of $175 no later than the due date for our federal income tax return for each of 2014, 2015 and 2016.

The preferred equity interest is not transferable by the trust except through its put and call features. After a period of five years from the contribution or, if earlier, the date upon which the pension plan trust is fully funded as determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), AT&T has a right to purchase from the pension plan trust some or all the preferred equity interest at the greater of their fair market value or minimum liquidation value plus any unpaid cumulative dividends. In addition, AT&T will have the right to purchase the preferred equity interest in the event AT&T's ownership of Mobility is less than 50% or there is a transaction that results in the transfer of 50% or more of the pension plan trust's assets to an entity not under common control with AT&T (collectively, a change of control). The pension plan trust has the right to require AT&T to purchase the preferred equity interest at the greater of their fair market value or minimum liquidation value plus any unpaid cumulative dividends, and in installments, as specified in the contribution agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following: (1) at any time if the ratio of debt to total capitalization of Mobility exceeds that of AT&T, (2) the date on which AT&T is rated below investment grade for two consecutive calendar quarters, (3) upon a change of control if AT&T does not exercise its purchase option, or (4) at any time after a seven-year period from the contribution date. In the event AT&T elects or is required to purchase the preferred equity interest, AT&T may elect to settle the purchase price in cash or shares of AT&T common stock or a combination thereof.

## CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS,
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Current accounting standards require us to disclose our material obligations and commitments to making future payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, and under contingent commitments, such as debt guarantees. We occasionally enter into third-party debt guarantees, but they are not, nor are they reasonably likely to become, material. We disclose our contractual long-term debt repayment obligations in Note 9 and our operating lease payments in Note 6. Our contractual obligations do not include contributions associated with our voluntary contribution of the Mobility preferred equity



interest, or expected pension and postretirement payments (we maintain pension funds and Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association trusts to fully or partially fund these benefits) (see Note 12). In the ordinary course of business, we routinely enter into commercial commitments for various aspects of our operations, such as plant additions, inventory and office supplies. However, we do not believe that the commitments will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014, are in the following table. The purchase obligations that follow are those for which we have guaranteed funds and will be funded with cash provided by operations or through incremental borrowings. The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contract. Other long-term liabilities are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Such estimate of payment is based on a review of past trends for these items, as well as a forecast of future activities. Certain items were excluded from the following table, as the year of payment is unknown and could not be reliably estimated since past trends were not deemed to be an indicator of future payment.

Substantially all of our purchase obligations are in our Wireline and Wireless segments. The table does not include the fair value of our interest rate swaps. Our capital lease obligations and bank borrowings have been excluded from the table due to the insignificant amounts of such obligations at December 31, 2014. Many of our other noncurrent liabilities have been excluded from the following table due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the absence of historical trending to be used as a predictor of such payments. Additionally, certain other long-term liabilities have been excluded since settlement of such liabilities will not require the use of cash. However, we have included, in the following table, obligations that primarily relate to benefit funding due to the certainty of the timing of these future payments. Our other long-term liabilities are: deferred income taxes (see Note 11) of $37,544; postemployment benefit obligations of $37,079; and other noncurrent liabilities of $17,989.

## Contractual Obligations

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="6">Payments Due By Period</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>Less than 1 Year</td><td>1-3 Years</td><td>3-5 Years</td><td>More than 5 Years</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt obligations \( ^{1} \)</td><td>8,486</td><td>$ 6,482</td><td>$ 12,031</td><td>$ 12,148</td><td>$ 54,205</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest payments on long-term debt</td><td>58,434</td><td>3,539</td><td>6,734</td><td>5,922</td><td>42,239</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Finance obligations \( ^{2} \)</td><td>3,724</td><td>225</td><td>464</td><td>482</td><td>2,553</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating lease obligations</td><td>31,047</td><td>3,879</td><td>6,931</td><td>5,694</td><td>14,543</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unrecognized tax benefits \( ^{3} \)</td><td>3,119</td><td>260</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>2,859</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Purchase obligations \( ^{4} \)</td><td>43,724</td><td>19,129</td><td>21,386</td><td>2,518</td><td>691</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Contractual Obligations</td><td>$22,914</td><td>$ 33,514</td><td>$ 47,546</td><td>$ 26,764</td><td>$117,090</td><td></td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Represents principal or payoff amounts of notes and debentures at maturity or, for public debt, the next put opportunity.

 \( ^{2} \)  Represents future minimum payments under the sublease arrangement for our tower transactions (see Note 17).

 \( ^{3} \)  The noncurrent portion of the UTBs is included in the “More than 5 Years” column, as we cannot reasonably estimate the timing or amounts of additional cash payments, if any, at this time. See Note 11 for additional information.

 \( ^{4} \)  We calculated the minimum obligation for certain agreements to purchase goods or services based on termination fees that can be paid to exit the contract. If we elect to exit these contracts, termination fees for all such contracts in the year of termination could be approximately $530 in 2015, $500 in the aggregate for 2016 and 2017, $82 in the aggregate for 2018 and 2019, and $0 in the aggregate thereafter. Certain termination fees are excluded from the above table, as the fees would not be paid every year and the timing of such payments, if any, is uncertain.

## MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. It is our policy to manage our debt structure and foreign exchange exposure in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term.
In managing market risks, we employ derivatives according to documented policies and procedures, including interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, foreign currency exchange contracts and combined interest rate foreign currency contracts (cross-currency swaps). We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies we use to manage market risk in the near future.



## Interest Rate Risk

The majority of our financial instruments are medium- and long-term fixed-rate notes and debentures. Changes in interest rates can lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of these instruments. The principal amounts by expected maturity, average interest rate and fair value of our liabilities that are exposed to interest rate risk are described in Notes 9 and 10. In managing interest expense, we control our mix of fixed and floating rate debt, principally through the use of interest rate swaps. We have established interest rate risk limits that we closely monitor by measuring interest rate sensitivities in our debt and interest rate derivatives portfolios.

All our foreign-denominated long-term debt has been swapped from fixed-rate or floating-rate foreign currencies to fixed-rate U.S. dollars at issuance through cross-currency swaps, removing interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk associated with the underlying interest and principal payments. Likewise, periodically we enter into interest rate locks to partially hedge the risk of increases in the benchmark interest rate during the period leading up to the probable issuance of fixed-rate debt. We expect gains or losses in our cross-currency swaps and interest rate locks to offset the losses and gains in the financial instruments they hedge.

Following are our interest rate derivatives subject to material interest rate risk as of December 31, 2014. The interest rates illustrated below refer to the average rates we expect to pay based on current and implied forward rates and the average rates we expect to receive based on derivative contracts. The notional amount is the principal amount of the debt subject to the interest rate swap contracts. The fair value asset (liability) represents the amount we would receive (pay) if we had exited the contracts as of December 31, 2014.

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="8">Maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>Thereafter</td><td>Total</td><td>Fair Value 12/31/14</td></tr><tr><td>Interest Rate Derivatives</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest Rate Swaps:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Receive Fixed/Pay Variable Notional Amount Maturing</td><td>$1,000</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 700</td><td>$1,500</td><td>$3,350</td><td>$ —</td><td>$6,550</td><td>$157</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-Average Variable Rate Payable \( ^{1} \)</td><td>2.4%</td><td>3.4%</td><td>4.2%</td><td>4.9%</td><td>4.2%</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-Average Fixed Rate Receivable</td><td>4.1%</td><td>4.2%</td><td>4.2%</td><td>4.5%</td><td>3.5%</td><td>—</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \) Interest payable based on current and implied forward rates for One, Three, or Six Month LIBOR plus a spread ranging between approximately 4 and 425 basis points.

## Foreign Exchange Risk

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk through our foreign affiliates and equity investments in foreign companies. We do not hedge foreign currency translation risk in the net assets and income we report from these sources. However, we do hedge a portion of the exchange risk involved in anticipation of highly probable foreign currency-denominated transactions and cash flow streams, such as those related to issuing foreign-denominated debt, receiving dividends from foreign investments, and other receipts and disbursements.

Through cross-currency swaps, all our foreign-denominated debt has been swapped from fixed-rate or floating-rate foreign currencies to fixed-rate U.S. dollars at issuance, removing interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk associated with the underlying interest and principal payments. We expect gains or losses in our cross-currency swaps to offset the losses and gains in the financial instruments they hedge.
In anticipation of other foreign currency-denominated transactions, we often enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to provide currency at a fixed rate. Our policy is to measure the risk of adverse currency fluctuations by calculating the potential dollar losses resulting from changes in exchange rates that have a reasonable probability of occurring. We cover the exposure that results from changes that exceed acceptable amounts.

For the purpose of assessing specific risks, we use a sensitivity analysis to determine the effects that market risk exposures may have on the fair value of our financial instruments and results of operations. To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assess the risk of loss in fair values from the effect of a hypothetical 10% depreciation of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies from the prevailing foreign currency exchange rates, assuming no change in interest rates. We had no foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2014.



## STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return
AT&T Inc., S&P 500 Index, and S&P 500 Integrated Telecom Index



The comparison above assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2009, in AT&T common stock, Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500), and Standard & Poor's 500 Integrated Telecom Index (S&P 500 Integrated Telecom). Total return equals stock price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends.

## RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this document, including the matters contained under the caption “Cautionary Language Concerning Forward-Looking Statements,” you should carefully read the matters described below. We believe that each of these matters could materially affect our business. We recognize that most of these factors are beyond our ability to control and therefore we cannot predict an outcome. Accordingly, we have organized them by first addressing general factors, then industry factors and, finally, items specifically applicable to us.

## The current U.S. economy has changed our customers' buying habits and a failure to adequately respond could materially adversely affect our business.

We provide services and products to consumers and large and small businesses in the United States and to larger businesses throughout the world. The current slow economic recovery in the United States continues to pressure some of our customers' demand for and ability to pay for existing services, especially local landline service, and their interest in purchasing new services. Customers are changing their buying habits in response to both ongoing economic conditions and technological advances. Should we fail to respond promptly to address these changes in customer demands, we are likely to experience greater pressure on pricing and margins as we continue to compete for customers who would have even less discretionary income.

## Adverse changes in medical costs and the U.S. securities markets and a further decline in interest rates could materially increase our benefit plan costs.

Our costs to provide current benefits and funding for future benefits are subject to increases, primarily due to continuing increases in medical and prescription drug costs, and can be affected by lower returns on funds held by our pension and other benefit plans, which are reflected in our financial statements for that year. Investment returns on these funds depend largely on trends in the U.S. securities markets and the U.S. economy. We have experienced historically low interest rates during the last several years. While we expect rates to increase during 2015, we expect relatively stable rates to continue for the next several years. Recent increases in market returns have led to better than assumed investment returns on our plan assets; however



the lower overall bond rates have led to higher benefit obligations. In calculating the costs included on our financial statements of providing benefits under our plans, we have made certain assumptions regarding future investment returns, medical costs and interest rates. If actual investment returns, medical costs and interest rates are worse than those previously assumed, our costs will increase.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board requires companies to recognize the funded status of defined benefit pension and postretirement plans as an asset or liability in our statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur. We have elected to reflect the annual adjustments to the funded status in our consolidated statements of income. Therefore, an increase in our costs or adverse market conditions will have a negative effect on our operating results.

## Adverse changes in global financial markets could limit our ability and our larger customers' ability to access capital or increase the cost of capital needed to fund business operations.

While the global financial markets were generally stable during 2014, a continuing uncertainty surrounding global growth rates has resulted in periodic volatility in the credit, currency, equity and fixed income markets. Volatility in some areas, such as in emerging markets, may affect companies' access to the credit markets, leading to higher borrowing costs for companies or, in some cases, the inability of these companies to fund their ongoing operations. In addition, we contract with large financial institutions to support our own treasury operations, including contracts to hedge our exposure on interest rates and foreign exchange and the funding of credit lines and other short-term debt obligations, including commercial paper. These financial institutions also face new capital-related and other regulations in the United States and Europe, as well as ongoing legal and financial issues concerning their loan portfolios, which may hamper their ability to provide credit or raise the cost of providing such credit. A company's cost of borrowing is also affected by evaluations given by various credit rating agencies and these agencies have been applying tighter credit standards when evaluating a company's debt levels and future growth prospects. While we have been successful in continuing to access the credit and fixed income markets when needed, adverse changes in the financial markets could render us either unable to access these markets or able to access these markets only at higher interest costs and with restrictive financial or other conditions, severely affecting our business operations.

## Changes in available technology could increase competition and our capital costs.

The telecommunications industry has experienced rapid changes in the past several years. The development of wireless, cable and IP technologies has significantly increased the commercial viability of alternatives to traditional wireline telephone service and enhanced the capabilities of wireless networks. In addition, our customers continue to demand services that can be accessed on mobile devices, especially video services. In order to remain competitive, we continue to deploy sophisticated wireline and wireless networks, as well as research other new technologies. If the new technologies we have adopted or on which we have focused our research efforts fail to be cost-effective and accepted by customers, our ability to remain competitive could be materially adversely affected.

## Changes to federal, state and foreign government regulations and decisions in regulatory proceedings could further increase our operating costs and/or alter customer perceptions of our operations, which could materially adversely affect us.

Our wireline subsidiaries are subject to significant federal and state regulation while many of our competitors are not. In addition, our subsidiaries and affiliates operating outside the United States are also subject to the jurisdiction of national and supranational regulatory authorities in the market where service is provided. Our wireless subsidiaries are regulated to varying degrees by the FCC and some state and local agencies. Adverse regulations and rulings by the FCC relating to broadband issues could impede our ability to manage our networks and recover costs and lessen incentives to invest in our networks. The development of new technologies, such as IP-based services, also has created or potentially could create conflicting regulation between the FCC and various state and local authorities, which may involve lengthy litigation to resolve and may result in outcomes unfavorable to us. In addition, increased public focus on a variety of issues related to our operations, such as privacy issues, government requests or orders for customer data, and potential global climate changes, have led to proposals at state, federal and foreign government levels to change or increase regulation on our operations. Should customers decide that our competitors operate in a more customer-friendly environment, we could be materially adversely affected.



Continuing growth in our wireless services will depend on continuing access to adequate spectrum, deployment of new technology and offering attractive services to customers.

The wireless industry is undergoing rapid and significant technological changes and a dramatic increase in usage, in particular demand for and usage of data, video and other non-voice services. We must continually invest in our wireless network in order to continually improve our wireless service to meet this increasing demand and remain competitive. Improvements in our service depend on many factors, including continued access to and deployment of adequate spectrum. We must maintain and expand our network capacity and coverage as well as the associated wireline network needed to transport voice and data between cell sites. To this end, we have participated in spectrum auctions, at increasing financial cost, and continue to deploy technology advancements in order to further improve network quality and the efficient use of our spectrum.

Network service enhancements and product launches may not occur as scheduled or at the cost expected due to many factors, including delays in determining equipment and handset operating standards, supplier delays, increases in network equipment and handset component costs, regulatory permitting delays for tower sites or enhancements or labor-related delays. Deployment of new technology also may adversely affect the performance of the network for existing services. If the FCC does not fairly allocate sufficient spectrum to allow the wireless industry in general, and the Company in particular, to increase its capacity or if we cannot acquire needed spectrum or deploy the services customers desire on a timely basis without burdensome conditions or at adequate cost while maintaining network quality levels, then our ability to attract and retain customers, and therefore maintain and improve our operating margins, could be materially adversely affected.

## Increasing competition for wireless customers could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We have multiple wireless competitors in each of our service areas and compete for customers based principally on service/device offerings, price, call quality, coverage area and customer service. In addition, we are facing growing competition from providers offering services using alternative wireless technologies and IP-based networks as well as traditional wireline networks. We expect market saturation to continue to cause the wireless industry's customer growth rate to moderate in comparison with historical growth rates, leading to increased competition for customers. We also expect that our customers' growing demand for data services will place constraints on our network capacity. This competition and our capacity issues will continue to put pressure on pricing and margins as companies compete for potential customers. Our ability to respond will depend, among other things, on continued improvement in network quality and customer service and effective marketing of attractive products and services, and cost management. These efforts will involve significant expenses and require strategic management decisions on, and timely implementation of, equipment choices, network deployment and management, and service offerings.

## Increasing costs in our wireline operations could adversely affect wireline operating margins.

We expect our operating costs, including customer acquisition and retention costs will continue to put pressure on pricing, margins and customer retention levels. A number of our competitors that rely on alternative technologies (e.g., wireless, cable and VoIP) and business models (e.g., advertising-supported) are typically subject to less (or no) regulation than our wireline subsidiaries and therefore are able to operate with lower costs. In addition, these competitors generally can focus on discrete customer segments since they do not have regulatory obligations to provide universal service. These competitors also have cost advantages compared to us, due in part to operating on newer, more technically advanced and lower-cost networks and a nonunionized workforce, lower employee benefits and fewer retirees (as most of the competitors are relatively new companies). Over time these cost disparities could require us to evaluate the strategic worth of various wireline operations. To this end, we have begun initiatives at both the state and federal levels to obtain regulatory approvals, where needed, to transition services from our older copper-based network to an advanced IP-based network. If we do not obtain regulatory approvals for this transition or obtain approvals with onerous conditions attached, we could experience significant cost and competitive disadvantages.

## Unfavorable litigation or governmental investigation results could require us to pay significant amounts or lead to onerous operating procedures.

We are subject to a number of lawsuits both in the United States and in foreign countries, including, at any particular time, claims relating to antitrust; patent infringement; wage and hour; personal injury; customer privacy violations; regulatory proceedings, and our advertising, sales and billing and collection practices. We also spend substantial resources complying with various government standards, which may entail related investigations and litigation. As we deploy newer technologies, especially in the wireless area, we also face current and potential litigation relating to alleged



adverse health effects on customers or employees who use such technologies including, for example, wireless handsets. We may incur significant expenses defending such suits or government charges and may be required to pay amounts or otherwise change our operations in ways that could materially adversely affect our operations or financial results.

## Cyber attacks, equipment failures, natural disasters and terrorist acts may materially adversely affect our operations.

Cyber attacks, major equipment failures or natural disasters, including severe weather, terrorist acts or other breaches of network or IT security that affect our wireline and wireless networks, including telephone switching offices, microwave links, third-party-owned local and long-distance networks on which we rely, our cell sites or other equipment, our customer account support and information systems, or employee and business records could have a material adverse effect on our operations. While we have been subject to security breaches or cyber attacks, these did not result in a material adverse effect on our operations. However, as such attacks continue to increase in scope and frequency, we may be unable to prevent a significant attack in the future. Our inability to operate our wireline, wireless or customer or employee-related support systems as a result of such events, even for a limited time period, could result in significant expenses, potential legal liability or a loss of customers or impair our ability to attract new customers, and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The impact of our pending acquisition of DIRECTV, including our ability to obtain governmental approvals on favorable terms including any required divestitures; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully; the risk that the cost savings and any other synergies from the acquisition may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; our costs in financing the acquisition and potential adverse effects on our share price and dividend amount due to the issuance of additional shares; the addition of DIRECTV's existing debt to our balance sheet; disruption from the acquisition making it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers; and competition and its effect on pricing, spending, third party relationships and revenues.

We have agreed to acquire DIRECTV for approximately $48,500. We believe that the acquisition will give us the scale, resources and ability to deploy video services to more customers than otherwise possible and to provide an integrated bundle of broadband, video and wireless services enabling us to compete more effectively against cable operators as well as other technology, media and communications companies. In addition, we believe the acquisition will result in cost savings, especially in the area of video content costs, and other potential synergies, enabling us to expand and enhance our broadband deployment and provide more video options across multiple fixed and mobile devices.

Achieving these results will depend upon obtaining governmental approvals on favorable terms within the time limits contemplated by the parties. Delays in closing, including as a result of delays in obtaining regulatory approval could divert attention from ongoing operations on the part of management and employees, adversely affecting customers and suppliers and therefore revenues. If such approvals are obtained and the transaction is consummated, then we must integrate a large number of video network and other operational systems and administrative systems, which may involve significant management time and create uncertainty for employees, customers and suppliers. The integration process may also result in significant expenses and charges against earnings, both cash and noncash. While we have successfully merged large companies into our operations in the past, delays in the process could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, expenses, operating results and financial condition. This acquisition also will increase the amount of debt on our balance sheet (both from DIRECTV's debt and the indebtedness needed to pay a portion of the purchase price) leading to additional interest expense and, due to additional shares being issued, will result in additional cash being required for any dividends declared. Both of these factors could put pressure on our financial flexibility to continue capital investments, develop new services and declare future dividends. In addition, events outside of our control, including changes in regulation and laws as well as economic trends, could adversely affect our ability to realize the expected benefits from this acquisition.

The acquisitions of DIRECTV, GSF Telecom and NII will increase our exposure to both changes in the international economy and to the level of regulation on our business and these risks could offset our expected growth opportunities from these acquisitions. (For ease of reading, we have assumed all three acquisitions have closed.) These three acquisitions will increase the magnitude of our international operations, particularly in Mexico and the rest of Latin America. We will need to comply with a wide variety of new and complex local laws, regulations and treaties and government involvement in private business activity. We will also be exposed to



restrictions on cash repatriation, foreign exchange controls, fluctuations in currency values, trade restrictions and other regulations that may affect materially our earnings. While the countries involved represent significant opportunities to sell our advanced services, a number of these same countries have experienced unstable growth patterns and at times have experienced high inflation, currency devaluation, foreign exchange controls, instability in the banking sector and high unemployment. Should these conditions reoccur, customers in these countries may be unable to purchase the services we offer or pay for services already provided.

In addition, operating in foreign countries also typically involves participating with local businesses, either to comply with local laws or, for example, to enhance product marketing. Involvement with foreign firms exposes us to the risk of being unable to control the actions of those firms and therefore exposes us to violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Violations of the FCPA could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

A majority of our workforce is represented by labor unions. Absent the successful negotiation of agreements that are scheduled to expire during 2015, we could experience lengthy work stoppages.

A majority of our employees are represented by labor unions as of year-end 2014. Labor contracts covering many of the employees will expire during 2015. We experienced a work stoppage in 2004 when the contracts involving our wireline employees expired, and we may experience additional work stoppages in 2015. A work stoppage could adversely affect our business operations, including a loss of revenue and strained relationships with customers, and we cannot predict the length of any such strike. We cannot predict the new contract provisions or the impact of any new contract on our financial condition.
Increases in our debt levels to fund acquisitions, additional spectrum purchases, or other strategic decisions could adversely affect our ability to finance future debt at attractive rates and reduce our ability to respond to competition and adverse economic trends. We have increased the amount of our debt during 2014 and 2015 to fund acquisitions, including spectrum purchases needed to compete in our business. While we believe such decisions were prudent and necessary to take advantage of both growth opportunities and respond to industry developments, banks and potential purchasers of our publicly-traded debt may decide that these strategic decisions and similar actions we may take in the future, as well as expected trends in the industry, will increase the risk of investing in our debt and may demand a higher rate of interest, impose restrictive covenants or otherwise limit the amount of potential borrowing.



## CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE CONCERNING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information set forth in this report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially. Many of these factors are discussed in more detail in the "Risk Factors" section. We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

The following factors could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:

• Adverse economic and/or capital access changes in the markets served by us or in countries in which we have significant investments, including the impact on customer demand and our ability and our suppliers' ability to access financial markets at favorable rates and terms.

• Changes in available technology and the effects of such changes, including product substitutions and deployment costs.

• Increases in our benefit plans' costs, including increases due to adverse changes in the United States and foreign securities markets, resulting in worse-than-assumed investment returns and discount rates; adverse changes in mortality assumptions; adverse medical cost trends, and unfavorable or delayed implementation of healthcare legislation, regulations or related court decisions.

• The final outcome of FCC and other federal or state agency proceedings (including judicial review, if any, of such proceedings) involving issues that are important to our business, including, without limit, intercarrier compensation, interconnection obligations, the transition from legacy technologies to IP-based infrastructure, universal service, broadband deployment, E911 services, competition policy, net neutrality, including potential attempts to reclassify broadband as Title II services subject to much more fulsome regulation, unbundled network elements and other wholesale obligations, availability of new spectrum from the FCC on fair and balanced terms, and wireless license awards and renewals.

• The final outcome of state and federal legislative efforts involving issues that are important to our business, including deregulation of IP-based services, relief from Carrier of Last Resort obligations, and elimination of state commission review of the withdrawal of services.

• Enactment of additional state, federal and/or foreign regulatory and tax laws and regulations pertaining to our subsidiaries and foreign investments, including laws and regulations that reduce our incentive to invest in our networks, resulting in lower revenue growth and/or higher operating costs.

• Our ability to absorb revenue losses caused by increasing competition, including offerings that use alternative technologies (e.g., cable, wireless and VoIP) and our ability to maintain capital expenditures.

• The extent of competition and the resulting pressure on customer and access line totals and wireline and wireless operating margins.

• Our ability to develop attractive and profitable product/service offerings to offset increasing competition in our wireless and wireline markets.
• The ability of our competitors to offer product/service offerings at lower prices due to lower cost structures and regulatory and legislative actions adverse to us, including state regulatory proceedings relating to unbundled network elements and nonregulation of comparable alternative technologies (e.g., VoIP).

• The continued development of attractive and profitable U-verse service offerings; the extent to which regulatory, franchise fees and build-out requirements apply to this initiative; and the availability, cost and/or reliability of the various technologies and/or content required to provide such offerings.

• Our continued ability to attract and offer a diverse portfolio of wireless service and device financing plans, devices and maintain margins.

• The availability and cost of additional wireless spectrum and regulations and conditions relating to spectrum use, licensing, obtaining additional spectrum, technical standards and deployment and usage, including network management rules.

• Our ability to manage growth in wireless data services, including network quality and acquisition of adequate spectrum at reasonable costs and terms.

• The outcome of pending, threatened or potential litigation, including patent and product safety claims by or against third parties.

• The impact on our networks and business from major equipment failures; security breaches related to the network or customer information; our inability to obtain handsets, equipment/software or have handsets, equipment/software serviced in a timely and cost-effective manner from suppliers; or severe weather conditions, natural disasters, pandemics, energy shortages, wars or terrorist attacks.

• The issuance by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting oversight bodies of new accounting standards or changes to existing standards.

• The issuance by the Internal Revenue Service and/or state tax authorities of new tax regulations or changes to existing standards and actions by federal, state or local tax agencies and judicial authorities with respect to applying applicable tax laws and regulations and the resolution of disputes with any taxing jurisdictions.

• Our pending acquisition of DIRECTV.

• Our ability to adequately fund our wireless operations, including payment for additional spectrum, network upgrades and technological advancements.

• Our increased exposure to foreign economies due to recent and pending acquisitions, including foreign exchange fluctuations.

• Changes in our corporate strategies, such as changing network requirements or acquisitions and dispositions, which may require significant amounts of cash or stock, to respond to competition and regulatory, legislative and technological developments.

• The uncertainty surrounding further congressional action to address spending reductions, which may result in a significant reduction in government spending and reluctance of businesses and consumers to spend in general and on our products and services specifically, due to this fiscal uncertainty.

Readers are cautioned that other factors discussed in this report, although not enumerated here, also could materially affect our future earnings.



## Consolidated Statements of Income

Dollars in millions except per share amounts

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$118,437</td><td>$119,252</td><td>$118,506</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>14,010</td><td>9,500</td><td>8,928</td></tr><tr><td>Total operating revenues</td><td>132,447</td><td>128,752</td><td>127,434</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cost of services and sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)</td><td>60,611</td><td>51,464</td><td>55,228</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative</td><td>39,697</td><td>28,414</td><td>41,066</td></tr><tr><td>Abandonment of network assets</td><td>2,120</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>18,273</td><td>18,395</td><td>18,143</td></tr><tr><td>Total operating expenses</td><td>120,701</td><td>98,273</td><td>114,437</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Income</td><td>11,746</td><td>30,479</td><td>12,997</td></tr><tr><td>Other Income (Expense)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>(3,613)</td><td>(3,940)</td><td>(3,444)</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income of affiliates</td><td>175</td><td>642</td><td>752</td></tr><tr><td>Other income (expense) - net</td><td>1,652</td><td>596</td><td>134</td></tr><tr><td>Total other income (expense)</td><td>(1,786)</td><td>(2,702)</td><td>(2,558)</td></tr><tr><td>Income Before Income Taxes</td><td>9,960</td><td>27,777</td><td>10,439</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense</td><td>3,442</td><td>9,224</td><td>2,900</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income</td><td>6,518</td><td>18,553</td><td>7,539</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest</td><td>(294)</td><td>(304)</td><td>(275)</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 6,224</td><td>$ 18,249</td><td>$ 7,264</td></tr><tr><td>Basic Earnings Per Share Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 1.19</td><td>$ 3.39</td><td>$ 1.25</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Earnings Per Share Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 1.19</td><td>$ 3.39</td><td>$ 1.25</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$6,518</td><td>$18,553</td><td>$7,539</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income, net of tax:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign Currency:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments (includes $0, $2) and $0 attributable to noncontrolling interest), net of taxes of $4, $5, $78) and $48</td><td>(75)</td><td>(140)</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>Reclassification adjustment included in net income, net of taxes of $224, $30 and $0</td><td>416</td><td>55</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Available-for-sale securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized gains, net of taxes of $40, $137, and $64</td><td>64</td><td>257</td><td>118</td></tr><tr><td>Reclassification adjustment included in net income, net of taxes of $10, $42) and $36</td><td>(16)</td><td>(79)</td><td>(68)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flow hedges:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized gains, net of taxes of $140, $286 and $154</td><td>260</td><td>525</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>Reclassification adjustment included in net income, net of taxes of $18, $16 and $15</td><td>36</td><td>30</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>Defined benefit postretirement plans:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net actuarial loss from equity method investees arising during period, net of taxes of $0, $0 and $32)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(53)</td></tr><tr><td>Reclassification adjustment included in net income, net of taxes of $11, $7 and $0</td><td>26</td><td>11</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net prior service credit arising during period, net of taxes of $262, $1,695 and $1,378</td><td>428</td><td>2,765</td><td>2,249</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of net prior service credit included in net income, net of taxes of $588, $480) and $361</td><td>(959)</td><td>(782)</td><td>(588)</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income</td><td>180</td><td>2,642</td><td>2,056</td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income</td><td>6,698</td><td>21,195</td><td>9,595</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>(294)</td><td>(302)</td><td>(275)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$6,404</td><td>$20,893</td><td>$9,320</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">December 31,</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Assets</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current Assets</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 8,603</td><td>$ 3,339</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts receivable - net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $454 and $483</td><td>14,527</td><td>12,918</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses</td><td>831</td><td>960</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred income taxes</td><td>1,142</td><td>1,199</td></tr><tr><td>Other current assets</td><td>6,925</td><td>4,780</td></tr><tr><td>Total current assets</td><td>32,028</td><td>23,196</td></tr><tr><td>Property, Plant and Equipment - Net</td><td>112,898</td><td>110,968</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill</td><td>69,692</td><td>69,273</td></tr><tr><td>Licenses</td><td>60,824</td><td>56,433</td></tr><tr><td>Other Intangible Assets - Net</td><td>6,139</td><td>5,779</td></tr><tr><td>Investments in Equity Affiliates</td><td>250</td><td>3,860</td></tr><tr><td>Other Assets</td><td>10,998</td><td>8,278</td></tr><tr><td>Total Assets</td><td>$292,829</td><td>$277,787</td></tr><tr><td>Liabilities and Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current Liabilities</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Debt maturing within one year</td><td>$ 6,056</td><td>$ 5,498</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable and accrued liabilities</td><td>23,592</td><td>21,107</td></tr><tr><td>Advanced billings and customer deposits</td><td>4,105</td><td>4,212</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued taxes</td><td>1,091</td><td>1,774</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends payable</td><td>2,438</td><td>2,404</td></tr><tr><td>Total current liabilities</td><td>37,282</td><td>34,995</td></tr><tr><td>Long-Term Debt</td><td>76,011</td><td>69,290</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Deferred income taxes</td><td>37,544</td><td>36,308</td></tr><tr><td>Postemployment benefit obligation</td><td>37,079</td><td>29,946</td></tr><tr><td>Other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>17,989</td><td>15,766</td></tr><tr><td>Total deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>92,612</td><td>82,020</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock ($1 par value, 14,000,000,000 authorized at December 31, 2014 and 2013: issued 6,495,231,088 at December 31, 2014 and 2013)</td><td>6,495</td><td>6,495</td></tr><tr><td>Additional paid-in capital</td><td>91,108</td><td>91,091</td></tr><tr><td>Retained earnings</td><td>27,736</td><td>31,141</td></tr><tr><td>Treasury stock (1,308,318,131 at December 31, 2014 and 1,268,914,913 at December 31, 2013, at cost)</td><td>(47,029)</td><td>(45,619)</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated other comprehensive income</td><td>8,060</td><td>7,880</td></tr><tr><td>Noncontrolling interest</td><td>554</td><td>494</td></tr><tr><td>Total stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>86,924</td><td>91,482</td></tr><tr><td>Total Liabilities and Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td><td>$292,829</td><td>$277,787</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Activities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$ 6,518</td><td>$ 18,553</td><td>$ 7,539</td></tr><tr><td>Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>18,273</td><td>18,395</td><td>18,143</td></tr><tr><td>Undistributed earnings from investments in equity affiliates</td><td>(27)</td><td>(324)</td><td>(615)</td></tr><tr><td>Provision for uncollectible accounts</td><td>1,032</td><td>954</td><td>1,117</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred income tax expense</td><td>1,772</td><td>6,242</td><td>1,747</td></tr><tr><td>Net gain from sale of investments, net of impairments</td><td>(1,532)</td><td>(492)</td><td>(19)</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial loss (gain) on pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>7,869</td><td>(7,584)</td><td>9,994</td></tr><tr><td>Abandonment of network assets</td><td>2,120</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Changes in operating assets and liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accounts receivable</td><td>(2,651)</td><td>(1,329)</td><td>(1,365)</td></tr><tr><td>Other current assets</td><td>(962)</td><td>412</td><td>1,017</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable and accrued liabilities</td><td>2,412</td><td>(152)</td><td>1,798</td></tr><tr><td>Retirement benefit funding</td><td>(560)</td><td>(209)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other - net</td><td>(2,926)</td><td>330</td><td>(180)</td></tr><tr><td>Total adjustments</td><td>24,820</td><td>16,243</td><td>31,637</td></tr><tr><td>Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities</td><td>31,338</td><td>34,796</td><td>39,176</td></tr><tr><td>Investing Activities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Construction and capital expenditures:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Capital expenditures</td><td>(21,199)</td><td>(20,944)</td><td>(19,465)</td></tr><tr><td>Interest during construction</td><td>(234)</td><td>(284)</td><td>(263)</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions, net of cash acquired</td><td>(3,141)</td><td>(4,113)</td><td>(828)</td></tr><tr><td>Dispositions</td><td>8,123</td><td>1,923</td><td>812</td></tr><tr><td>(Purchases) sales of securities, net</td><td>(1,890)</td><td>—</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>Return of advances to and investments in equity affiliates</td><td>4</td><td>301</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>—</td><td>(7)</td><td>(1)</td></tr><tr><td>Net Cash Used in Investing Activities</td><td>(18,337)</td><td>(23,124)</td><td>(19,680)</td></tr><tr><td>Financing Activities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net change in short-term borrowings with original maturities of three months or less</td><td>(16)</td><td>20</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of other short-term borrowings</td><td>—</td><td>1,476</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Repayment of other short-term borrowings</td><td>—</td><td>(1,476)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of long-term debt</td><td>15,926</td><td>12,040</td><td>13,486</td></tr><tr><td>Repayment of long-term debt</td><td>(10,400)</td><td>(7,698)</td><td>(8,733)</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of other long-term financing obligations</td><td>107</td><td>4,796</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Purchase of treasury stock</td><td>(1,617)</td><td>(13,028)</td><td>(12,752)</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of treasury stock</td><td>39</td><td>114</td><td>477</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends paid</td><td>(9,552)</td><td>(9,696)</td><td>(10,241)</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>(2,224)</td><td>251</td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td>Net Cash Used in Financing Activities</td><td>(7,737)</td><td>(13,201)</td><td>(17,673)</td></tr><tr><td>Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>5,264</td><td>(1,529)</td><td>1,823</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year</td><td>3,339</td><td>4,868</td><td>3,045</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and Cash Equivalents End of Year</td><td>$ 8,603</td><td>$ 3,339</td><td>$ 4,868</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



## Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Dollars and shares in millions except per share amounts

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">2014</td><td colspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td></tr><tr><td>Shares</td><td>Amount</td><td>Shares</td><td>Amount</td><td>Shares</td><td>Amount</td></tr><tr><td>Common Stock</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>6,495</td><td>$ 6,495</td><td>6,495</td><td>$ 6,495</td><td>6,495</td><td>$ 6,495</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of stock</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>6,495</td><td>$ 6,495</td><td>6,495</td><td>$ 6,495</td><td>6,495</td><td>$ 6,495</td></tr><tr><td>Additional Paid-In Capital</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td></td><td>$ 91,091</td><td></td><td>$ 91,038</td><td></td><td>$ 91,156</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of treasury stock</td><td></td><td>4</td><td></td><td>(8)</td><td></td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>Share-based payments</td><td></td><td>47</td><td></td><td>62</td><td></td><td>(78)</td></tr><tr><td>Share of equity method investee capital transactions</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>(160)</td></tr><tr><td>Change related to acquisition of interests held by noncontrolling owners</td><td></td><td>(34)</td><td></td><td>(1)</td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td></td><td>$ 91,108</td><td></td><td>$ 91,091</td><td></td><td>$ 91,038</td></tr><tr><td>Retained Earnings</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td></td><td>$ 31,141</td><td></td><td>$ 22,481</td><td></td><td>$ 25,453</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to AT&amp;T ($1.19, $3.39 and $1.25 per diluted share)</td><td></td><td>6,224</td><td></td><td>18,249</td><td></td><td>7,264</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends to stockholders ($1.85, $1.81 and $1.77 per share)</td><td></td><td>(9,629)</td><td></td><td>(9,589)</td><td></td><td>(10,236)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td></td><td>$ 27,736</td><td></td><td>$ 31,141</td><td></td><td>$ 22,481</td></tr><tr><td>Treasury Stock</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>(1,269)</td><td>$(45,619)</td><td>(914)</td><td>$(32,888)</td><td>(568)</td><td>$ (20,750)</td></tr><tr><td>Repurchase of common stock</td><td>(48)</td><td>(1,617)</td><td>(366)</td><td>(13,028)</td><td>(371)</td><td>(12,752)</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of treasury stock</td><td>9</td><td>207</td><td>11</td><td>297</td><td>25</td><td>614</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>(1,308)</td><td>$ (47,029)</td><td>(1,269)</td><td>$ (45,619)</td><td>(914)</td><td>$ (32,888)</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Attributable to AT&amp;T, net of tax:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td></td><td>$ 7,880</td><td></td><td>$ 5,236</td><td></td><td>$ 3,180</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td></td><td>180</td><td></td><td>2,644</td><td></td><td>2,056</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td></td><td>$ 8,060</td><td></td><td>$ 7,880</td><td></td><td>$ 5,236</td></tr><tr><td>Noncontrolling Interest:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td></td><td>$ 494</td><td></td><td>$ 333</td><td></td><td>$ 263</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td></td><td>294</td><td></td><td>304</td><td></td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>Distributions</td><td></td><td>(233)</td><td></td><td>(231)</td><td></td><td>(205)</td></tr><tr><td>Contributions</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>51</td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests</td><td></td><td>69</td><td></td><td>44</td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of interests held by noncontrolling owners</td><td></td><td>(70)</td><td></td><td>(5)</td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of taxes</td><td></td><td>—</td><td></td><td>(2)</td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td></td><td>$ 554</td><td></td><td>$ 494</td><td></td><td>$ 333</td></tr><tr><td>Total Stockholders&#x27; Equity at beginning of year</td><td></td><td>$ 91,482</td><td></td><td>$ 92,695</td><td></td><td>$105,797</td></tr><tr><td>Total Stockholders&#x27; Equity at end of year</td><td></td><td>$ 86,924</td><td></td><td>$ 91,482</td><td></td><td>$ 92,695</td></tr></table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



## NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation Throughout this document, AT&T Inc. is referred to as “AT&T,” “we” or the “Company.” The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our majority-owned subsidiaries and affiliates. Our subsidiaries and affiliates operate in the communications services industry both domestically and internationally, providing wireless communications services, traditional wireline voice services, data/broadband and Internet services, video services, telecommunications equipment, managed networking and wholesale services.

All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated in the consolidation process. Investments in less than majority-owned subsidiaries and partnerships where we have significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. Earnings from certain investments accounted for using the equity method are included for periods ended within up to one month of our year end (see Note 8). We also recorded our proportionate share of our equity method investees' other comprehensive income (OCI) items, including actuarial gains and losses on pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes, including estimates of probable losses and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

New Accounting Standards In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (ASU 2014-09), which replaces existing revenue recognition rules with a comprehensive revenue measurement and recognition standard and expanded disclosure requirements. Upon initial evaluation, we believe the key changes in the standard that impact our revenue recognition relate to the allocation of contract revenues between service and equipment, and the timing in which those revenues are recognized. ASU 2014-09 also specifies that all incremental costs of obtaining and direct costs of fulfilling our contracts with customers should be deferred and recognized over the contract period or expected customer life. Currently, we generally defer such costs only up to an amount equal to any related deferred revenue. ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.

The FASB will allow two adoption methods under ASU 2014-09. Under one method, a company will apply the rules to contracts in all reporting periods presented, subject to certain allowable exceptions. Under the other method, a company will apply the rules to all contracts existing as of January 1, 2017, recognizing in beginning retained earnings an adjustment for the cumulative effect of the change and provide additional disclosures comparing results to previous rules. We continue to evaluate the impact of the new standard and available adoption methods.

Income Taxes We provide deferred income taxes for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the computed tax basis of those assets and liabilities. We provide valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets for which the realization is uncertain. We review these items regularly in light of changes in federal and state tax laws and changes in our business.

Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amounts approximate fair value. At December 31, 2014, we held $1,257 in cash and $7,346 in money market funds and other cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition Revenues derived from wireless, local telephone, long distance, data and video services are recognized when services are provided. This is based upon either usage (e.g., minutes of traffic/bytes of data processed), period of time (e.g., monthly service fees) or other established fee schedules. Our service revenues are billed either in advance, arrears or are prepaid.

We record revenue reductions for estimated future adjustments to customer accounts, other than bad debt expense, at the time revenue is recognized based on historical experience. Service revenues include billings to our customers for various regulatory fees imposed on us by governmental authorities. We report revenues from transactions between us and our customers net of taxes the government authorities require us to collect from our customers in our consolidated statements of income. Cash incentives given to customers are recorded as a reduction of revenue. Revenues and associated expenses related to nonrefundable, upfront service activation and setup fees are deferred and recognized over the associated service contract period or customer life. Generally, associated expenses are deferred only up to the amount of deferred revenue. Revenue recognized from contracts that bundle services and equipment is limited to the lesser of the amount allocated based on the relative selling price of the equipment and service already delivered or the amount paid and owed by the customer for the equipment and service already delivered. We record the sale of equipment to customers when we no longer have any requirements to perform, when title is passed and when the products are accepted by customers. We record the sale of equipment and services to customers as gross revenue when we are the principal in the arrangement and net of the associated costs incurred when we are not considered the principal in the arrangement.



We offer to our customers the option to purchase certain wireless devices in installments over a period of up to 30 months, with the right to trade in the original equipment for a new device, within a set period, and have the remaining unpaid balance satisfied. For customers that elect these trade-in programs, we recognize revenue for the entire amount of the customer receivable, net of the fair value of the trade-in right guarantee and imputed interest. See Note 16 for additional information, including the sales of our equipment installment receivables.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We record expense to maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that result from the failure or inability of our customers to make required payments deemed collectable from the customer when the service was provided or product was delivered. When determining the allowance, we consider the probability of recoverability of accounts receivable based on past experience, taking into account current collection trends as well as general economic factors, including bankruptcy rates. Credit risks are assessed based on historical write-offs, net of recoveries, as well as an analysis of the aged accounts receivable balances with allowances generally increasing as the receivable ages. Accounts receivable may be fully reserved for when specific collection issues are known to exist, such as pending bankruptcy or catastrophes.

Inventory Inventories, which are included in “Other current assets” on our consolidated balance sheets, were $1,933 at December 31, 2014, and $1,148 at December 31, 2013. Wireless devices and accessories, which are valued at the lower of cost or market (determined using current replacement cost) were $1,858 at December 31, 2014, and $1,031 at December 31, 2013.

Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, except for assets acquired using acquisition accounting, which are initially recorded at fair value (see Note 6). The balance as of December 31, 2013, excluded amounts classified as held for sale (see Note 5). The cost of additions and substantial improvements to property, plant and equipment is capitalized, and includes internal compensation costs for these projects; however, noncash actuarial gains or losses included in compensation costs are excluded from amounts reported as “capital expenditures.” The cost of maintenance and repairs of property, plant and equipment is charged to operating expenses. Property, plant and equipment costs are depreciated using straight-line methods over their estimated economic lives. Certain subsidiaries follow composite group depreciation methodology. Accordingly, when a portion of their depreciable property, plant and equipment is retired in the ordinary course of business, the gross book value is reclassified to accumulated depreciation, and no gain or loss is recognized on the disposition of these assets.
Property, plant and equipment is reviewed for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.

The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recorded in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize period-to-period changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. The increase in the carrying value of the associated long-lived asset is depreciated over the corresponding estimated economic life.

Software Costs It is our policy to capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal-use software. Capitalized software costs are included in “Property, Plant and Equipment” on our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, there is certain network software that allows the equipment to provide the features and functions unique to the AT&T network, which we include in the cost of the equipment categories for financial reporting purposes.

During 2014, we completed studies evaluating the periods that we were utilizing our software assets. As of April 1 and July 1, 2014, we extended our estimated useful lives for capitalized non-network and network software, respectively, to five years to better reflect the estimated periods during which these assets will remain in service and to align with the estimated useful lives used in the industry. This change in accounting estimate decreased depreciation expenses and impacted 2014 net income $513, or $0.10 per diluted share. Prior to 2014, capitalized software costs were primarily amortized over a three-year period.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets AT&T has four major classes of intangible assets: goodwill, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses, other indefinite-lived intangible assets, made up predominately of the AT&T brand, and various other finite-lived intangible assets (see Note 7).

Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. FCC licenses provide us with the exclusive right to utilize certain radio frequency spectrum to provide wireless communications services. While FCC licenses are issued for a fixed period of time (generally 10 years), renewals of FCC licenses have occurred routinely and at nominal cost. Moreover, we have determined that there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive,



economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our FCC licenses. We acquired the rights to the AT&T and other brand names in previous acquisitions. We have the effective ability to retain these exclusive rights permanently at a nominal cost.

Goodwill, FCC licenses and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment. The testing is performed on the value as of October 1 each year, and compares the book value of the assets to their fair value. Goodwill is tested by comparing the book value of each reporting unit, deemed to be our principal operating segments (Wireless and Wireline), to the fair value of those reporting units calculated using a discounted cash flow approach as well as a market multiple approach. FCC licenses are tested for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with the management of the business on a national scope. We perform our test of the fair values of FCC licenses using a discounted cash flow approach. Brand names are tested by comparing the book value to a fair value calculated using a discounted cash flow approach on a presumed royalty rate derived from the revenues related to the brand name.

Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives (see Note 7). Customer lists and relationships are amortized using primarily the sum-of-the-months-digits method of amortization over the period in which those relationships are expected to contribute to our future cash flows. The remaining finite-lived intangible assets are generally amortized using the straight-line method.

Advertising Costs We expense advertising costs for advertising products and services or for promoting our corporate image as we incur them (see Note 15).

Traffic Compensation Expense We use various estimates and assumptions to determine the amount of traffic compensation expense recognized during any reporting period. Switched traffic compensation costs are accrued utilizing estimated rates and volumes by product, formulated from historical data and adjusted for known rate changes. Such estimates are adjusted monthly to reflect newly available information, such as rate changes and new contractual agreements. Bills reflecting actual incurred information are generally not received within three months subsequent to the end of the reporting period, at which point a final adjustment is made to the accrued switched traffic compensation expense. Dedicated traffic compensation costs are estimated based on the number of circuits and the average projected circuit costs.

Foreign Currency Translation We are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk through our foreign affiliates and equity investments in foreign companies. Our foreign subsidiaries and foreign investments generally report their earnings in their local currencies. We translate our share of their foreign assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates. We translate our share of their revenues and expenses using average rates during the year. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (accumulated OCI) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (see Note 3). We do not hedge foreign currency translation risk in the net assets and income we report from these sources. However, we do hedge a portion of the foreign currency exchange risk involved in anticipation of highly probable foreign currency-denominated transactions, which we explain further in our discussion of our methods of managing our foreign currency risk (see Note 10).

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits See Note 12 for a comprehensive discussion of our pension and postretirement benefit expense, including a discussion of the actuarial assumptions, our policy for recognizing the associated gains and losses and our method used to estimate service and interest cost components.

## NOTE 2. EARNINGS PER SHARE

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share is shown in the table below:

<table><tr><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Numerators</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Numerator for basic earnings per share:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$6,518</td><td>$18,553</td><td>$7,539</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest</td><td>(294)</td><td>(304)</td><td>(275)</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>6,224</td><td>18,249</td><td>7,264</td></tr><tr><td>Dilutive potential common shares:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Share-based payment</td><td>13</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>Numerator for diluted earnings per share</td><td>$6,237</td><td>$18,261</td><td>$7,276</td></tr><tr><td>Denominators (000,000)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Denominator for basic earnings per share:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>5,205</td><td>5,368</td><td>5,801</td></tr><tr><td>Dilutive potential common shares:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Share-based payment (in shares)</td><td>16</td><td>17</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>Denominator for diluted earnings per share</td><td>5,221</td><td>5,385</td><td>5,821</td></tr><tr><td>Basic earnings per share attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 1.19</td><td>$ 3.39</td><td>$ 1.25</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted earnings per share attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>$ 1.19</td><td>$ 3.39</td><td>$ 1.25</td></tr></table>



## NOTE 3. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Changes in the balances of each component included in accumulated OCI are presented below. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI include amounts realized upon the sale of our investment in América Móvil, S.A. de C.V. (América Móvil) (see Note 5). All amounts are net of tax and exclude noncontrolling interest.

<table><tr><td colspan="6">At December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the years ended</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment</td><td>Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities</td><td>Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges</td><td>Defined Benefit Postretirement Plans</td><td>Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of December 31, 2012</td><td>$ (284)</td><td>$ 272</td><td>$ (110)</td><td>$ 5,358</td><td>$ 5,236</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications</td><td>(138)</td><td>257</td><td>525</td><td>2,765</td><td>3,409</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI</td><td>551</td><td>(79) \( ^{2} \)</td><td>303</td><td>(771) \( ^{4} \)</td><td>(765)</td></tr><tr><td>Net other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>(83)</td><td>178</td><td>555</td><td>1,994</td><td>2,644</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of December 31, 2013</td><td>(367)</td><td>450</td><td>445</td><td>7,352</td><td>7,880</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications</td><td>(75)</td><td>64</td><td>260</td><td>428</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI</td><td>416 \( ^{1} \)</td><td>(16) \( ^{2} \)</td><td>363</td><td>(933) \( ^{4} \)</td><td>(497)</td></tr><tr><td>Net other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>341</td><td>48</td><td>296</td><td>(505)</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of December 31, 2014</td><td>$ (26)</td><td>$ 498</td><td>$ 741</td><td>$ 6,847</td><td>$ 8,060</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Translation (gain) loss reclassifications are included in Other income (expense) – net in the consolidated statements of income.

 \( ^{2} \) (Gains) losses are included in Other income (expense) – net in the consolidated statements of income.

 \( ^{3} \) (Gains) losses are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 10 for additional information.

 \( ^{4} \)  The amortization of prior service credits associated with postretirement benefits, net of amounts capitalized as part of construction labor, are included in Cost of services and sales and Selling, general and administrative in the consolidated statements of income (see Note 12). Actuarial loss reclassifications related to our equity method investees are included in Other income (expense) – net in the consolidated statements of income.

## NOTE 4. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Our segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services over various technology platforms and are managed accordingly. We analyze our operating segments based on segment income before income taxes. We make our capital allocation decisions based on our strategic direction of the business, needs of the network (wireless or wireline) providing services and to provide emerging services to our customers. Actuarial gains and losses from pension and other postretirement benefits, interest expense and other income (expense) – net, are managed only on a total company basis and are, accordingly, reflected only in consolidated results. Therefore, these items are not included in each segment's reportable results. The customers and long-lived assets of our reportable segments are predominantly in the United States. We have two reportable segments: (1) Wireless and (2) Wireline. Our operating results prior to May 9, 2012, also included our sold Advertising Solutions segment (see Note 5).

The Wireless segment uses our nationwide network to provide consumer and business customers with wireless data and voice communications services. This segment included our portion of the results from our equity investment in the Softcard \( ^{™} \)  mobile wallet joint venture. The Wireline segment uses our regional, national and global network to provide consumer and business customers with data and voice communications services, AT&T U-verse \( ^{®} \)  high speed Internet, video and VoIP services and managed networking to business customers.

The Corporate and Other column includes unallocated corporate expenses, which includes costs to support corporate-driven activities and operations, impacts of corporate-wide decisions for which the individual operating segments are not being evaluated, including interest costs and expected return on plan assets for our pension and postretirement benefit plans as well as our actuarial gains and losses on our pension and postretirement plan valuations. Results from equity method investments in América Móvil (prior to the June 2014 disposal of our investment), YP Holdings LLC, and Otter Media (our joint venture with The Chernin Group), are also excluded from our segment results as those results are not considered in our assessment of segment performance. We have revised our prior-period presentation to conform to our current reporting.



Segment Results, including a reconciliation to AT&T consolidated results, for 2014, 2013, and 2012 are as follows:

<table><tr><td>At December 31, 2014 and for the year ended</td><td>Wireless</td><td>Wireline</td><td>Advertising Solutions</td><td>Corporate and Other</td><td>Consolidated Results</td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$ 61,032</td><td>$ 57,405</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$118,437</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>12,960</td><td>1,020</td><td>—</td><td>30</td><td>14,010</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment operating revenues</td><td>73,992</td><td>58,425</td><td>—</td><td>30</td><td>132,447</td></tr><tr><td>Operations and support expenses</td><td>48,924</td><td>42,471</td><td>—</td><td>11,033</td><td>102,428</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization expenses</td><td>7,941</td><td>10,323</td><td>—</td><td>9</td><td>18,273</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment operating expenses</td><td>56,865</td><td>52,794</td><td>—</td><td>11,042</td><td>120,701</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating income (loss)</td><td>17,127</td><td>5,631</td><td>—</td><td>(11,012)</td><td>11,746</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3,613</td><td>3,613</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates</td><td>(112)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>287</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>Other income (expense) - net</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,652</td><td>1,652</td></tr><tr><td>Segment income (loss) before income taxes</td><td>$ 17,015</td><td>$ 5,631</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (12,686)</td><td>$ 9,960</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Assets</td><td>$156,317</td><td>$121,794</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 14,718</td><td>$292,829</td></tr><tr><td>Investments in equity method affiliates</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>250</td><td>250</td></tr><tr><td>Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets</td><td>11,383</td><td>10,044</td><td>—</td><td>6</td><td>21,433</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>At December 31, 2013 and for the year ended</td><td>Wireless</td><td>Wireline</td><td>Advertising Solutions</td><td>Corporate and Other</td><td>Consolidated Results</td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$ 61,552</td><td>$ 57,700</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 119,252</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>8,347</td><td>1,114</td><td>—</td><td>39</td><td>9,500</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment operating revenues</td><td>69,899</td><td>58,814</td><td>—</td><td>39</td><td>128,752</td></tr><tr><td>Operations and support expenses</td><td>44,508</td><td>41,638</td><td>—</td><td>(6,268)</td><td>79,878</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization expenses</td><td>7,468</td><td>10,907</td><td>—</td><td>20</td><td>18,395</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment operating expenses</td><td>51,976</td><td>52,545</td><td>—</td><td>(6,248)</td><td>98,273</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating income</td><td>17,923</td><td>6,269</td><td>—</td><td>6,287</td><td>30,479</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3,940</td><td>3,940</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates</td><td>(75)</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>715</td><td>642</td></tr><tr><td>Other income (expense) - net</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>596</td><td>596</td></tr><tr><td>Segment income before income taxes</td><td>$ 17,848</td><td>$ 6,271</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 3,658</td><td>$ 27,777</td></tr><tr><td>Segment Assets</td><td>$ 141,196</td><td>$ 123,714</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 12,877</td><td>$ 277,787</td></tr><tr><td>Investments in equity method affiliates</td><td>61</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3,799</td><td>3,860</td></tr><tr><td>Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets</td><td>11,191</td><td>10,036</td><td>—</td><td>1</td><td>21,228</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>For the year ended December 31, 2012</td><td>Wireless</td><td>Wireline</td><td>Advertising Solutions</td><td>Corporate and Other</td><td>Consolidated Results</td></tr><tr><td>Service</td><td>$ 59,186</td><td>$ 58,271</td><td>$1,049</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 118,506</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment</td><td>7,577</td><td>1,302</td><td>—</td><td>49</td><td>8,928</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment operating revenues</td><td>66,763</td><td>59,573</td><td>1,049</td><td>49</td><td>127,434</td></tr><tr><td>Operations and support expenses</td><td>43,296</td><td>41,207</td><td>773</td><td>11,018</td><td>96,294</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization expenses</td><td>6,873</td><td>11,123</td><td>106</td><td>41</td><td>18,143</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment operating expenses</td><td>50,169</td><td>52,330</td><td>879</td><td>11,059</td><td>114,437</td></tr><tr><td>Segment operating income (loss)</td><td>16,594</td><td>7,243</td><td>170</td><td>(11,010)</td><td>12,997</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3,444</td><td>3,444</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates</td><td>(62)</td><td>(1)</td><td>—</td><td>815</td><td>752</td></tr><tr><td>Other income (expense) - net</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>134</td><td>134</td></tr><tr><td>Segment income (loss) before income taxes</td><td>$ 16,532</td><td>$ 7,242</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ (13,505)</td><td>$ 10,439</td></tr></table>



## NOTE 5. ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS AND OTHER ADJUSTMENTS

## Acquisitions

Spectrum Acquisitions During 2014, we acquired $1,263 of wireless spectrum, not including Leap Wireless International, Inc. (Leap) discussed below. During 2013, we acquired $895 of wireless spectrum from various companies, not including the 700 MHz, Atlantic Tele-Network Inc. (ATNI) and NextWave purchases discussed below. During 2012, we acquired $855 of wireless spectrum from various companies.

In January 2015, we submitted winning bids for 251 Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) spectrum in the AWS-3 Auction (FCC Auction 97) for $18,189. We provided the FCC an initial down payment of $921 in October 2014 and paid the remaining down payment of $2,717 on February 13, 2015. We will pay the balance of $14,551 on or before March 2, 2015.

Leap In March 2014, we acquired Leap, a provider of prepaid wireless service, for $15.00 per outstanding share of Leap’s common stock, or $1,248 (excluding Leap’s cash on hand), plus one nontransferable contingent value right (CVR) per share. The CVR will entitle each Leap stockholder to a pro rata share of the net proceeds of the future sale of the Chicago 700 MHz A-band FCC license held by Leap.

The values of assets acquired under the terms of the agreement were: $3,000 in licenses, $510 in property, plant and equipment, $520 of customer lists, $340 for trade names and $248 of goodwill. The estimated fair value of debt associated with the acquisition of Leap was $3,889, all of which was redeemed or matured by July 31, 2014.

700 MHz Spectrum In September 2013, we acquired spectrum in the 700 MHz B band from Verizon Wireless for $1,900 in cash and an assignment of AWS spectrum licenses in five markets. The 700 MHz licenses acquired by AT&T cover 42 million people in 18 states. We recognized a gain of approximately $293 on this and other spectrum transactions.

Atlantic Tele-Network In September 2013, we acquired ATNI’s U.S. retail wireless operations, operated under the Alltel brand, for $806 in cash, which included closing adjustments. Under the terms of the agreement, we acquired wireless properties, with a value of $322 in licenses and $296 of goodwill.

NextWave In January 2013, we completed the acquisition of NextWave Wireless Inc. (NextWave), which held wireless licenses in the Wireless Communication Services and AWS bands. We acquired all the equity and purchased a portion of the debt of NextWave for $605. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition of spectrum.

## Subsequent and Pending Acquisitions

GSF Telecom On January 16, 2015, we acquired Mexican wireless company GSF Telecom Holdings, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (GSF Telecom) for $2,500, less net debt of approximately $700. GSF Telecom offers service under both the lusacell and Unefon brand names in Mexico.

NII Holdings Inc. On January 26, 2015, we entered into an agreement with NII Holdings Inc. (NII) to acquire its wireless business in Mexico for $1,875, less any outstanding net debt held by the business at closing, in a transaction pursuant to Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We will acquire companies, which operate under the name Nextel Mexico, and approximately 3.0 million subscribers.

DIRECTV In May 2014, we announced a merger agreement to acquire DIRECTV in a stock-and-cash transaction for $95.00 per share of DIRECTV's common stock, or approximately $48,500 at the date of announcement. As of December 31, 2014, DIRECTV had approximately $16,177 in net debt. Each DIRECTV shareholder will receive cash of $28.50 per share and $66.50 per share in our stock subject to a collar such that DIRECTV shareholders will receive 1.905 AT&T shares if our average stock price is below $34.90 per share at closing and 1.724 AT&T shares if our average stock price is above $38.58 at closing. If our average stock price (calculated in accordance with the merger agreement with DIRECTV) is between $34.90 and $38.58 at closing, then DIRECTV shareholders will receive a number of shares between 1.724 and 1.905, equal to $66.50 in value. DIRECTV is a premier pay TV provider in the United States and Latin America, with a high-quality customer base, the best selection of programming, the best technology for delivering and viewing high-quality video on any device and the best customer satisfaction among major U.S. cable and satellite TV providers.

The merger agreement was adopted by DIRECTV’s stockholders on September 25, 2014 and remains subject to review by the FCC and the Department of Justice and to other closing conditions. It is also a condition that all necessary consents by certain foreign governmental entities have been obtained and are in full force and effect. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2015. The merger agreement provides certain mutual termination rights for us and DIRECTV, including the right of either party to terminate the agreement if the merger is not consummated by May 18, 2015, subject to extension in certain cases to a date no later than November 13, 2015. Either party may also terminate the agreement if an order permanently restraining, enjoining, or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the merger becomes final and nonappealable. In October 2014, DIRECTV and the National Football League renewed their agreement for the “NFL Sunday Ticket” service substantially on the terms discussed



between AT&T and DIRECTV, satisfying one of the conditions to closing the merger. Under certain circumstances relating to a competing transaction, DIRECTV may be required to pay a termination fee to us in connection with or following a termination of the agreement.

## Dispositions

Connecticut Wireline On October 24, 2014, we sold our incumbent local exchange operations in Connecticut for $2,018 and recorded a pre-tax gain of $147, which is included in “Other income (expense) – net,” on our consolidated statements of income. In conjunction with the sale, we allocated $743 of goodwill from our Wireline reporting unit. Because the book value of the goodwill did not have a corresponding tax basis, the resulting net income impact of the sale was a loss of $289.

We applied held-for-sale treatment to the assets and liabilities of the Connecticut operations, and, accordingly, included the assets in “Other current assets,” and the related liabilities in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities,” on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2013. However, the business did not qualify as discontinued operations as we expect significant continuing direct cash flows related to the disposed operations. Assets and liabilities of the Connecticut operations included the following as of December 31, 2013:

<table><tr><td colspan="2">Assets held for sale:</td></tr><tr><td>Current assets</td><td>$ 155</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment - net</td><td>1,289</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill</td><td>799</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$2,260</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Liabilities related to assets held for sale:</td></tr><tr><td>Current liabilities</td><td>$ 128</td></tr><tr><td>Noncurrent liabilities</td><td>480</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>$ 608</td></tr></table>

América Móvil In 2014, we sold our remaining stake in América Móvil for approximately $5,885 and recorded a pre-tax gain of $1,330, which is included in “Other income (expense) – net,” on our consolidated statements of income. In 2013, we sold a portion of our shares in América Móvil for approximately $1,179. América Móvil was accounted for as an equity method investment (see Note 8).

Advertising Solutions In May 2012, we completed the sale of our Advertising Solutions segment to an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. for approximately $740 in cash after closing adjustments, a $200 advance, which was repaid in 2013, and a 47 percent equity interest in the new entity, YP Holdings. Our operating results include the results of the Advertising Solutions segment through May 8, 2012.

## NOTE 6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment is summarized as follows at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Lives (years)</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Land</td><td>—</td><td>$ 1,567</td><td>$ 1,523</td></tr><tr><td>Buildings and improvements</td><td>10-44</td><td>32,204</td><td>31,485</td></tr><tr><td>Central office equipment \( ^{1} \)</td><td>3-10</td><td>89,857</td><td>86,370</td></tr><tr><td>Cable, wiring and conduit</td><td>15-50</td><td>72,766</td><td>76,107</td></tr><tr><td>Other equipment</td><td>3-15</td><td>74,244</td><td>67,887</td></tr><tr><td>Software</td><td>3-5 \( ^{2} \)</td><td>8,604</td><td>8,150</td></tr><tr><td>Under construction</td><td>—</td><td>3,053</td><td>3,276</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>282,295</td><td>274,798</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td></td><td>169,397</td><td>163,830</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment - net</td><td></td><td>$112,898</td><td>$110,968</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Includes certain network software.

 \( ^{2} \)  Reflects extended estimated useful life (see Note 1).

Our depreciation expense was $17,773 in 2014, $17,722 in 2013 and $16,933 in 2012. Depreciation expense included amortization of software totaling $1,504 in 2014, $2,142 in 2013 and $2,130 in 2012.

We periodically assess our network assets for impairment, and our analysis in 2014 indicated no impairment. However, due to declining customer demand for our legacy voice and data products and the migration of our networks to next generation technologies, we decided in the fourth quarter of 2014 to abandon in place specific copper network assets classified as cable, wiring and conduit. These abandoned assets had a gross book value of approximately $7,141, with accumulated depreciation of $5,021. We recorded a $2,120 noncash charge for this abandonment, which is included in “Abandonment of network assets” on our consolidated statements of income.

Certain facilities and equipment used in operations are leased under operating or capital leases. Rental expenses under operating leases were $4,345 for 2014, $3,683 for 2013, and $3,507 for 2012. At December 31, 2014, the future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases for the years 2015 through 2019 were $3,879, $3,641, $3,290, $2,981, and $2,713, with $14,543 due thereafter. Certain real estate operating leases contain renewal options that may be exercised. Capital leases are not significant.



## NOTE 7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill, by segment (which is the same as the reporting unit for Wireless and Wireline) were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Wireless</td><td>Wireline</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of January 1, 2013</td><td>$ 35,803</td><td>$ 33,970</td><td>$ 69,773</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill acquired</td><td>305</td><td>—</td><td>305</td></tr><tr><td>Held for sale</td><td>—</td><td>(799)</td><td>(799)</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>(2)</td><td>(4)</td><td>(6)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of December 31, 2013</td><td>36,106</td><td>33,167</td><td>69,273</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill acquired</td><td>367</td><td>—</td><td>367</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>(4)</td><td>56</td><td>52</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of December 31, 2014</td><td>$36,469</td><td>$33,223</td><td>$69,692</td></tr></table>

The majority of our goodwill acquired during 2014 related to our acquisition of Leap (see Note 5). Other changes to our goodwill during 2014 include adjustments related to closing the sale of our Connecticut operations (see Note 5). Changes to goodwill during 2013 resulted from the acquisition of ATNI and the held for sale adjustment to goodwill in conjunction with the sale of our Connecticut operations (see Note 5).

Our other intangible assets are summarized as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">December 31, 2014</td><td colspan="2">December 31, 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Gross Carrying Amount</td><td>Accumulated Amortization</td><td>Gross Carrying Amount</td><td>Accumulated Amortization</td></tr><tr><td>Other Intangible Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortized intangible assets:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Customer lists and relationships:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Wireless Acquisitions</td><td>$ 1,082</td><td>$ 550</td><td>$ 982</td><td>$ 771</td></tr><tr><td>BellSouth Corporation</td><td>5,825</td><td>5,559</td><td>5,825</td><td>5,317</td></tr><tr><td>AT&amp;T Corp.</td><td>56</td><td>42</td><td>2,482</td><td>2,438</td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal</td><td>6,963</td><td>6,151</td><td>9,289</td><td>8,526</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>275</td><td>189</td><td>284</td><td>169</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 7,238</td><td>$6,340</td><td>$ 9,573</td><td>$8,695</td></tr><tr><td>Indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Licenses</td><td>$60,824</td><td></td><td>$56,433</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade names</td><td>5,241</td><td></td><td>4,901</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$66,065</td><td></td><td>$61,334</td><td></td></tr></table>

As discussed in Note 5, license additions in 2014 were primarily related to the Leap acquisition, with the remainder originating from various spectrum license purchases.

Amortized intangible assets are definite-life assets, and as such, we record amortization expense based on a method that most appropriately reflects our expected cash flows from these assets, over a weighted-average of 9.8 years (9.7 years for customer lists and relationships and 12.1 years for other). Amortization expense for definite-life intangible assets was $500 for the year ended December 31, 2014, $672 for the year ended December 31, 2013, and $1,210 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Amortization expense is estimated to be $350 in 2015, $244 in 2016, $177 in 2017, $57 in 2018, and $28 in 2019.
In 2014, we wrote off approximately $2,850 of fully amortized intangible assets (primarily customer lists). In 2013, we wrote off approximately $6,217 of fully amortized intangible assets (primarily customer lists). We review other amortizing intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable over the remaining life of the asset or asset group.

We review indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually (see Note 1). Licenses include wireless FCC licenses that provide us with the exclusive right to utilize certain radio frequency spectrum to provide wireless communications services.



## NOTE 8. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

Investments in partnerships, joint ventures and less than majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have significant influence are accounted for under the equity method.

Our investments in equity affiliates at December 31, 2014 primarily include our interests in Otter Media Holdings, YP Holdings and Root Sports Southwest.

Otter Media Holdings We hold a 38% interest in Otter Media Holdings, which was acquired in 2014 and is a venture between The Chernin Group and AT&T, which is focused on acquiring, investing in and launching over-the-top subscription video services.

YP Holdings We hold a 47% interest in YP Holdings, an online advertising company and directory publisher. During 2013, we received $200 from the repayment of advances to YP Holdings and $101 from the return of investment in YP Holdings.

Root Sports Southwest We hold a 40% interest in Root Sports Southwest, which was acquired in 2014 and is part of regional sports networks owned and operated by DIRECTV Sports Networks LLC.

América Móvil We sold our remaining stake in América Móvil in June 2014 (see Note 5).

The following table is a reconciliation of our investments in equity affiliates as presented on our consolidated balance sheets:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Beginning of year</td><td>$ 3,860</td><td>$4,581</td></tr><tr><td>Additional investments</td><td>226</td><td>111</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in net income of affiliates</td><td>175</td><td>642</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends and distributions received</td><td>(148)</td><td>(318)</td></tr><tr><td>Currency translation adjustments</td><td>—</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>Sale of América Móvil shares</td><td>(3,817)</td><td>(781)</td></tr><tr><td>Return of advances to and investments in YP Holdings</td><td>—</td><td>(301)</td></tr><tr><td>América Móvil equity adjustments</td><td>—</td><td>(124)</td></tr><tr><td>Other adjustments</td><td>(46)</td><td>(11)</td></tr><tr><td>End of year</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$3,860</td></tr></table>

Undistributed earnings from equity affiliates were $88 and $3,346 at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

## NOTE 9. DEBT

Long-term debt of AT&T and its subsidiaries, including interest rates and maturities, is summarized as follows at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Notes and debentures</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest Rates</td><td>Maturities \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.60% - 2.99%</td><td>2015 - 2022</td><td>22,127</td><td>18,774</td></tr><tr><td>3.00% - 4.99%</td><td>2014 - 2045</td><td>31,516</td><td>22,327</td></tr><tr><td>5.00% - 6.99%</td><td>2014 - 2095</td><td>23,260</td><td>28,513</td></tr><tr><td>7.00% - 9.10%</td><td>2014 - 2097</td><td>6,153</td><td>6,268</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td></td><td>—</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of interest rate swaps</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>recorded in debt</td><td></td><td>125</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>83,181</td><td>76,037</td></tr><tr><td>Unamortized (discount) premium - net</td><td>(1,549)</td><td>(1,553)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total notes and debentures</td><td>81,632</td><td>74,484</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Capitalized leases</td><td>430</td><td>283</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total long-term debt, including current maturities</td><td>82,062</td><td>74,767</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>(6,051)</td><td>(5,477)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total long-term debt</td><td>76,011</td><td>69,290</td><td></td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Maturities assume public debt is redeemed by the holders at the next opportunity.

We had outstanding Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Swiss Franc denominated debt of approximately $24,655 and $18,146 at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The weighted-average interest rate of our entire long-term debt portfolio, including the impact of derivatives, decreased from 4.4% at December 31, 2013 to 4.2% at December 31, 2014.

Current maturities of long-term debt include debt that may be put back to us by the holders in 2015. We have $1,000 of annual put reset securities that may be put each April until maturity in 2021. If the holders do not require us to repurchase the securities, the interest rate will be reset based on current market conditions. Likewise, we have an accreting zero-coupon note that may be redeemed each May, until maturity in 2022. If the zero-coupon note (issued for principal of $500 in 2007) is held to maturity, the redemption amount will be $1,030.

Debt maturing within one year consisted of the following at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>$6,051</td><td>$5,477</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial paper</td><td>—</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>Bank borrowings \( ^{1} \)</td><td>5</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$6,056</td><td>$5,498</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Outstanding balance of short-term credit facility of a foreign subsidiary.



## Debt Refinancing

During 2014, we received net proceeds of $15,926 from the issuance of $16,013 in long-term debt in various markets, with an average weighted maturity of approximately 13 years and a weighted average coupon of 2.4%. We redeemed $10,400 in borrowings of various notes with stated rates of 0.875% to 7.75%.

On January 29, 2015, we issued $2,619 of 4.600% global notes due 2045.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants and conditions of instruments governing our debt. Substantially all of our outstanding long-term debt is unsecured. Maturities of outstanding long-term notes and debentures, as of December 31, 2014, and the corresponding weighted-average interest rate scheduled for repayment are as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>There-after</td></tr><tr><td>Debt repayments \( ^{1} \)</td><td>$6,482</td><td>$5,523</td><td>$6,508</td><td>$5,800</td><td>$6,348</td><td>$54,205</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average interest rate</td><td>4.0%</td><td>2.1%</td><td>2.4%</td><td>4.6%</td><td>3.7%</td><td>4.9%</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Debt repayments assume public debt is redeemed by the holders at the next opportunity.

## Credit Facilities

We have a $5,000 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that expires in December 2018 (the “December 2018 Facility”) and a $3,000 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that expires in December 2017 (the “December 2017 Facility”). In addition, on January 21, 2015, we entered into a $9,155 credit agreement (the “Syndicated Credit Agreement”) containing (i) a $6,286 term loan facility (the “Tranche A Facility”) and (ii) a $2,869 term loan facility (the “Tranche B Facility”), with certain investment and commercial banks and Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (“Mizuho”), as administrative agent. On that date, AT&T also entered into a $2,000 18-month credit agreement (the “18-Month Credit Agreement”) with Mizuho as initial lender and agent.

## Revolving Credit Agreements

In the event advances are made under either the December 2018 Facility or the December 2017 Facility, those advances would be used for general corporate purposes. Advances are not conditioned on the absence of a material adverse change. All advances must be repaid no later than the date on which lenders are no longer obligated to make any advances under each agreement. Under each agreement, we can terminate, in whole or in part, amounts committed by the lenders in excess of any outstanding advances; however, we cannot reinstate any such terminated commitments. At December 31, 2014, we had no advances outstanding under either agreement and were in compliance with all covenants under each agreement.

Advances under both agreements would bear interest, at AT&T's option, either:

• at a variable annual rate equal to (1) the highest of: (a) the base (or prime) rate of the bank affiliate of Citibank, N.A. which is serving as administrative agent under the Agreement, (b) 0.50% per annum above the Federal funds rate, and (c) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) applicable to U.S. dollars for a period of one month plus 1.00% per annum, plus (2) an applicable margin, as set forth in the Agreement (Applicable Margin; each such advance, a Base Rate Advance); or

• at a rate equal to: (i) the LIBOR for a period of one, two, three or six months, as applicable, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (each such advance, a Eurodollar Rate Advance).

The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under both agreements will equal 0.565%, 0.680%, or 0.910% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under both agreements will be 0%.

Under each agreement, AT&T will pay a facility fee of 0.060%, 0.070% or 0.090% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating, of the amount of lender commitments.

Both agreements contain covenants that are customary for an issuer with an investment grade senior debt credit rating. Among other covenants, both agreements provide that AT&T will maintain, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, a debt-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other modifications described in the agreements) ratio of not more than 3-to-1, for the four quarters then ended.

Events of default under both agreements are customary for facilities of this nature and result in the acceleration or permit the lenders to accelerate, as applicable, required repayment and would increase the Applicable Margin by 2.00% per annum.

The obligations of the lenders under the December 2017 Facility to provide advances will terminate on December 11, 2017, unless prior to that date either: (i) AT&T, and if applicable, a Co-Borrower, reduce to $0 the commitments of the lenders, or (ii) certain events of default occur. We and lenders representing more than



50% of the facility amount may agree to extend their commitments for two one-year periods beyond the December 11, 2017, termination date, under certain circumstances. We also can request the lenders to further increase their commitments (i.e., raise the available credit) up to an additional $2,000 provided no event of default has occurred. The same provisions apply to the December 2018 Facility except that the applicable date is December 11, 2018.

## The Syndicated Credit Agreement

In the event advances are made under the Syndicated Credit Agreement, those advances would be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisition related payments. Amounts borrowed under the Tranche A Facility will be due and payable on the third anniversary of funding. Amounts borrowed under the Tranche B Facility will be subject to amortization from the third anniversary of funding, with twenty-five percent of the aggregate principal amount thereof being payable prior to the fifth anniversary thereof, and all remaining principal amount due and payable on such fifth anniversary. The obligations of the lenders under the Syndicated Credit Agreement to provide advances extend from the effective date of the agreement to a termination date of March 21, 2015, unless prior to that date either: (i) AT&T reduces to $0 the commitments of the lenders under the Syndicated Credit Agreement or (ii) certain events of default occur.

Advances would bear interest, at AT&T's option, either:

- at a variable annual rate equal to: (1) the highest of (a) Mizuho’s publicly-announced prime rate, (b) 0.50% per annum above the Federal funds rate, and (c) the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited Settlement Rate applicable to dollars for a period of one month plus 1.00%, plus (2) an applicable margin, as set forth in the Syndicated Credit Agreement (Applicable Margin) (each such Advance, a Base Rate Advance); or

- at a rate equal to: (i) the LIBOR for deposits in dollars (adjusted upwards to reflect any bank reserve costs) for a period of three or six months, as applicable, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (each such Advance, a Eurodollar Rate Advance).

The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche A Facility will equal 1.000%, 1.125% or 1.250% per annum depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under the Tranche A Facility will be equal to the relevant Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche A Facility minus 1.00%. The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche B Facility will equal 1.125%, 1.250% or 1.375% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under the Tranche B Facility will be equal to the relevant Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the Tranche B Facility minus 1.00%.

The Syndicated Credit Agreement contains covenants that are customary for an issuer with an investment grade senior debt credit rating. Among other things, the Syndicated Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a debt-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other modifications described in the Syndicated Credit Agreement) ratio of not more than 3-to-1, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter.

Events of default are customary for an agreement of this nature and result in the acceleration or permit the lenders to accelerate, as applicable, required payment and which would increase the Applicable Margin by 2.00% per annum.

## The 18-Month Credit Agreement

As with the Syndicated Credit Agreement, advances under the 18-Month Credit Agreement would be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisition related payments. Amounts borrowed under the 18-Month Credit Agreement will be due and payable on the date that is 18 months after the funding. The obligations of the lender under the 18-Month Credit Agreement to provide advances extend from the effective date of the agreement to a termination date of March 21, 2015, unless prior to that date either: (i) AT&T reduces to $0 the commitment of the lender under the 18-Month Credit Agreement or (ii) certain events of default occur.

Advances would bear interest, at AT&T's option, either:

- at a variable annual rate equal to: (1) the highest of (a) Mizuho’s publicly-announced prime rate, (b) 0.50% per annum above the Federal funds rate, and (c) the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited Settlement Rate applicable to dollars for a period of one month plus 1.00%, plus (2) an applicable margin, as set forth in the 18-Month Credit Agreement (Applicable Margin) (each such Advance, a Base Rate Advance); or

- at a rate equal to: (i) the LIBOR for deposits in dollars (adjusted upwards to reflect any bank reserve costs) for a period of one, two, three or six months, as applicable, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin (each such Advance, a Eurodollar Rate Advance).



The Applicable Margin for a Eurodollar Rate Advance under the 18-Month Credit Agreement will equal 0.800%, 0.900% or 1.000% per annum, depending on AT&T's credit rating. The Applicable Margin for a Base Rate Advance under the 18-Month Credit Agreement will be 0%.

In the event that AT&T’s unsecured senior long-term debt ratings are split by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch, then the Applicable Margin will be determined by the highest rating, unless the lowest of such ratings is more than one level below the highest of such ratings, in which case the pricing will be the rating that is one level above the lowest of such ratings.

The 18-Month Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants and events of default equivalent to those contained in the Syndicated Credit Agreement.

## NOTE 10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURE

The Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure framework provides a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that gives highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

LEVEL 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access.

LEVEL 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology include:

• Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.

• Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

• Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

• Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

LEVEL 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
• Fair value is often based on developed models in which there are few, if any, external observations.

The fair value measurements level of an asset or liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used should maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The valuation methodologies described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of future net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. We believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants. The use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. There have been no changes in the methodologies used since December 31, 2013.

## Long-Term Debt and Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term debt, including current maturities and other financial instruments, are summarized as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">December 31, 2014</td><td colspan="2">December 31, 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Carrying Amount</td><td>Fair Value</td><td>Carrying Amount</td><td>Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Notes and debentures</td><td>$81,632</td><td>$90,367</td><td>$74,484</td><td>$79,309</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial paper</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>20</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>Bank borrowings</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Investment securities</td><td>2,735</td><td>2,735</td><td>2,450</td><td>2,450</td></tr></table>

The carrying value of debt with an original maturity of less than one year approximates fair value. The fair value measurements used for notes and debentures are considered Level 2 and are determined using various methods, including quoted prices for identical or similar securities in both active and inactive markets.



Following is the fair value leveling for available-for-sale securities and derivatives as of December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">December 31, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Available-for-Sale Securities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic equities</td><td>$1,160</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1,160</td></tr><tr><td>International equities</td><td>553</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>553</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income bonds</td><td>—</td><td>836</td><td>—</td><td>836</td></tr><tr><td>Asset Derivatives \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate swaps</td><td>—</td><td>157</td><td>—</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-currency swaps</td><td>—</td><td>1,243</td><td>—</td><td>1,243</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate locks</td><td>—</td><td>5</td><td>—</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Liability Derivatives \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cross-currency swaps</td><td>—</td><td>(1,506)</td><td>—</td><td>(1,506)</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate locks</td><td>—</td><td>(133)</td><td>—</td><td>(133)</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">December 31, 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Available-for-Sale Securities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic equities</td><td>$ 1,049</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1,049</td></tr><tr><td>International equities</td><td>563</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>563</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income bonds</td><td>—</td><td>759</td><td>—</td><td>759</td></tr><tr><td>Asset Derivatives \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate swaps</td><td>—</td><td>191</td><td>—</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-currency swaps</td><td>—</td><td>1,951</td><td>—</td><td>1,951</td></tr><tr><td>Liability Derivatives \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate swaps</td><td>—</td><td>(7)</td><td>—</td><td>(7)</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-currency swaps</td><td>—</td><td>(519)</td><td>—</td><td>(519)</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Derivatives designated as hedging instruments are reflected as “Other assets;” “Other noncurrent liabilities” and, for a portion of interest rate swaps, “Other current assets” in our consolidated balance sheets.

## Investment Securities

Our investment securities include equities, fixed income bonds and other securities. A substantial portion of the fair values of our available-for-sale securities was estimated based on quoted market prices. Investments in securities not traded on a national securities exchange are valued using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Realized gains and losses on securities are included in “Other income (expense) – net” in the consolidated statements of income using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are recorded in accumulated OCI. Unrealized losses that are considered other than temporary are recorded in “Other income (expense) – net” with the corresponding reduction to the carrying basis of the investment. Fixed income investments of $102 have maturities of less than one year, $417 within one to three years, $75 within three to five years, and $242 for five or more years.

Our cash equivalents (money market securities), short-term investments (certificate and time deposits) and customer deposits are recorded at amortized cost, and the respective carrying amounts approximate fair values. Our short-term investments of $1,890 are recorded in “Other current assets” and our investment securities are recorded in “Other Assets” on the consolidated balance sheets.

## Derivative Financial Instruments

We employ derivatives to manage certain market risks, primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk. This includes the use of interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, foreign exchange forward contracts and combined interest rate foreign exchange contracts (cross-currency swaps). We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. We record derivatives on our consolidated balance sheets at fair value that is derived from observable market data, including yield curves and foreign exchange rates (all of our derivatives are Level 2). Cash flows associated with derivative instruments are presented in the same category on the consolidated statements of cash flows as the item being hedged.

The majority of our derivatives are designated either as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), or as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge).



Fair Value Hedging We designate our fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps as fair value hedges. The purpose of these swaps is to manage interest rate risk by managing our mix of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt. These swaps involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts for floating interest rate payments over the life of the swaps without exchange of the underlying principal amount. Accrued and realized gains or losses from interest rate swaps impact interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps are recorded at fair market value as assets, and unrealized losses on interest rate swaps are recorded at fair market value as liabilities. Changes in the fair values of the interest rate swaps are exactly offset by changes in the fair value of the underlying debt. Gains or losses realized upon early termination of our fair value hedges are recognized in interest expense. In the years ended December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, no ineffectiveness was measured on interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges.

Cash Flow Hedging We designate our cross-currency swaps as cash flow hedges. We have entered into multiple cross-currency swaps to hedge our exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that are attributable to foreign currency risk generated from the issuance of our Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Swiss Franc denominated debt. These agreements include initial and final exchanges of principal from fixed foreign denominations to fixed U.S. denominated amounts, to be exchanged at a specified rate, which was determined by the market spot rate upon issuance. They also include an interest rate swap of a fixed or floating foreign-denominated rate to a fixed U.S. denominated interest rate.

Unrealized gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value as liabilities, both for the period they are outstanding. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion is reported as a component of accumulated OCI until reclassified into interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings. The gain or loss on the ineffective portion is recognized as “Other income (expense) – net” in the consolidated statements of income in each period. We evaluate the effectiveness of our cross-currency swaps each quarter. In the years ended December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, no ineffectiveness was measured on cross-currency swaps designated as cash flow hedges.

Periodically, we enter into and designate interest rate locks to partially hedge the risk of changes in interest payments attributable to increases in the benchmark interest rate during the period leading up to the probable issuance of fixed-rate debt. We designate our interest rate locks as cash flow hedges. Gains and losses when we settle our interest rate locks are amortized into income over the life of the related debt, except where a material amount is deemed to be ineffective, which would be immediately reclassified to “Other income (expense) – net” in the consolidated statements of income. In the years ended December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, no ineffectiveness was measured on interest rate locks. Over the next 12 months, we expect to reclassify $39 from accumulated OCI to interest expense due to the amortization of net losses on historical interest rate locks. Our unutilized interest rate locks carry mandatory early terminations, the latest occurring in the first half of 2015.

We hedge a portion of the exchange risk involved in anticipation of highly probable foreign currency-denominated transactions. In anticipation of these transactions, we often enter into foreign exchange contracts to provide currency at a fixed rate. Some of these instruments are designated as cash flow hedges while others remain nondesignated, largely based on size and duration. Gains and losses at the time we settle or take delivery on our designated foreign exchange contracts are amortized into income in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, except where an amount is deemed to be ineffective, which would be immediately reclassified to “Other income (expense) – net” in the consolidated statements of income. In the years ended December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, no ineffectiveness was measured on foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges.

Collateral and Credit-Risk Contingency We have entered into agreements with our derivative counterparties establishing collateral thresholds based on respective credit ratings and netting agreements. At December 31, 2014, we had posted collateral of $530 (a deposit asset) and held collateral of $599 (a receipt liability). Under the agreements, if our credit rating had been downgraded one rating level by Moody's Investor Service and Standard & Poor's Rating Services and two rating levels by Fitch Ratings, before the final collateral exchange in December, we would have been required to post additional collateral of $91. At December 31, 2013, we had posted collateral of $8 (a deposit asset) and held collateral of $1,600 (a receipt liability). We do not offset the fair value of collateral, whether the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable), against the fair value of the derivative instruments.

Following is the notional amount of our outstanding derivative positions at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate swaps</td><td>$ 6,550</td><td>$ 4,750</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-currency swaps</td><td>26,505</td><td>17,787</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate locks</td><td>6,750</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$39,805</td><td>$22,537</td></tr></table>



Following is the related hedged items affecting our financial position and performance:

## Effect of Derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income

<table><tr><td>Fair Value Hedging Relationships</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>For the years ended December 31,</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate swaps (Interest expense):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gain (Loss) on interest rate swaps</td><td>$ (29)</td><td>$ (113)</td><td>$ (179)</td></tr><tr><td>Gain (Loss) on long-term debt</td><td>29</td><td>113</td><td>179</td></tr></table>

In addition, the net swap settlements that accrued and settled in the periods above were offset against interest expense.

<table><tr><td>Cash Flow Hedging Relationships</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>For the year ended December 31,</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-currency swaps:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gain (Loss) recognized in accumulated OCI</td><td>$ 528</td><td>$ 813</td><td>$ 432</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate locks:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gain (Loss) recognized in accumulated OCI</td><td>(128)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income (expense) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income</td><td>(44)</td><td>(46)</td><td>(43)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign exchange contracts:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gain (Loss) recognized in accumulated OCI</td><td>—</td><td>(2)</td><td>5</td></tr></table>

## NOTE 11. INCOME TAXES

Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities (assets) are as follows at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>$ 47,082</td><td>$43,623</td></tr><tr><td>Intangibles (nonamortizable)</td><td>1,874</td><td>1,874</td></tr><tr><td>Employee benefits</td><td>(11,679)</td><td>(9,072)</td></tr><tr><td>Net operating loss and other carryforwards</td><td>(2,126)</td><td>(2,272)</td></tr><tr><td>Other - net</td><td>69</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal</td><td>35,220</td><td>34,182</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred tax assets valuation allowance</td><td>1,182</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>Net deferred tax liabilities</td><td>$ 36,402</td><td>$35,109</td></tr><tr><td>Net long-term deferred tax liabilities</td><td>$ 37,544</td><td>$36,308</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net current deferred tax assets</td><td>(1,142)</td><td>(1,199)</td></tr><tr><td>Net deferred tax liabilities</td><td>$ 36,402</td><td>$35,109</td></tr></table>

At December 31, 2014, we had combined net operating and capital loss carryforwards (tax effected) for federal income tax purposes of $222 and for state and foreign income tax purposes of $959, expiring through 2033. Additionally, we had state credit carryforwards of $945, expiring primarily through 2033.

We recognize a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Our valuation allowances at December 31, 2014 and 2013, related primarily to state net operating losses and state credit carryforwards.

We recognize the financial statement effects of a tax return position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will ultimately be sustained. For tax positions that meet this recognition threshold, we apply our judgment, taking into account applicable tax laws, our experience in managing tax audits and relevant GAAP, to determine the amount of tax benefits to recognize in our financial statements. For each position, the difference between the benefit realized on our tax return and the benefit reflected in our financial statements is recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as an unrecognized tax benefit (UTB). We update our UTBs at each financial statement date to reflect the impacts of audit settlements and other resolutions of audit issues, the expiration of statutes of limitation, developments in tax law and ongoing discussions with taxing authorities. A reconciliation of the change in our UTB balance from January 1 to December 31 for 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

<table><tr><td>Federal, State and Foreign Tax</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 4,227</td><td>$ 4,793</td></tr><tr><td>Increases for tax positions related to the current year</td><td>470</td><td>255</td></tr><tr><td>Increases for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>484</td><td>488</td></tr><tr><td>Decreases for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>(657)</td><td>(1,238)</td></tr><tr><td>Lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>(38)</td><td>(24)</td></tr><tr><td>Settlements</td><td>(21)</td><td>(47)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>4,465</td><td>4,227</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued interest and penalties</td><td>973</td><td>1,034</td></tr><tr><td>Gross unrecognized income tax benefits</td><td>5,438</td><td>5,261</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Deferred federal and state income tax benefits</td><td>(434)</td><td>(481)</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Tax attributable to timing items included above</td><td>(2,400)</td><td>(2,121)</td></tr><tr><td>Total UTB that, if recognized, would impact the effective income tax rate as of the end of the year</td><td>$ 2,604</td><td>$ 2,659</td></tr></table>

Periodically we make deposits to taxing jurisdictions which reduce our UTB balance but are not included in the reconciliation above. The amount of deposits that reduced our UTB balance was $2,258 at December 31, 2014, and $2,303 at December 31, 2013.

Accrued interest and penalties included in UTBs were $973 as of December 31, 2014, and $1,034 as of December 31, 2013. We record interest and penalties related to federal, state and foreign UTBs in income tax expense. The net interest and penalty expense (benefit) included in income tax expense was $(64) for 2014, $35 for 2013, and $(74) for 2012.



We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. As a large taxpayer, our income tax returns are regularly audited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other taxing authorities. The IRS has completed field examinations of our tax returns through 2010. All audit periods prior to 2003 are closed for federal examination purposes. Contested issues from our 2003 through 2010 returns are at various stages of resolution with the IRS Appeals Division; we are unable to estimate the impact the resolution of these issues may have on our UTBs.

The components of income tax (benefit) expense are as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Federal:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current</td><td>$1,609</td><td>$3,043</td><td>$ 451</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred - net</td><td>1,904</td><td>5,692</td><td>2,256</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3,513</td><td>8,735</td><td>2,707</td></tr><tr><td>State, local and foreign:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current</td><td>61</td><td>(61)</td><td>702</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred - net</td><td>(132)</td><td>550</td><td>(509)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>(71)</td><td>489</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$3,442</td><td>$9,224</td><td>$2,900</td></tr></table>

A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate (35%) to income from continuing operations before income taxes is as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Taxes computed at federal statutory rate</td><td>$3,486</td><td>$9,722</td><td>$3,654</td></tr><tr><td>Increases (decreases) in income taxes resulting from:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>State and local income taxes - net of federal income tax benefit</td><td>(127)</td><td>294</td><td>85</td></tr><tr><td>Connecticut wireline sale</td><td>325</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Loss of foreign tax credits in connection with América Móvil sale</td><td>386</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other - net</td><td>(628)</td><td>(792)</td><td>(839)</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$3,442</td><td>$9,224</td><td>$2,900</td></tr><tr><td>Effective Tax Rate</td><td>34.6%</td><td>33.2%</td><td>27.8%</td></tr></table>

## NOTE 12. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

## Pension Benefits and Postretirement Benefits

Substantially all of our U.S. employees are covered by one of our noncontributory pension plans. The majority of our newly hired employees, longer-service management and some nonmanagement employees participate in cash balance pension programs that include annual or monthly credits based on salary as well as an interest credit. Other longer-service management employees participate in pension programs that have a traditional pension formula (i.e., a stated percentage of employees' adjusted career income). Other longer-service nonmanagement employees' pension benefits are generally calculated using one of two formulas: a flat dollar amount applied to years of service according to job classification or a cash balance plan with negotiated annual pension band credits as well as interest credits. Most nonmanagement employees can elect to receive their pension benefits in either a lump sum payment or an annuity. Effective January 1, 2015, the pension plan was amended so that new management hires are no longer eligible for the plan.

We also provide a variety of medical, dental and life insurance benefits to certain retired employees under various plans and accrue actuarially determined postretirement benefit costs as active employees earn these benefits.

In December 2014, we announced an opportunity for certain management employees who are retirement eligible as of March 31, 2015 to elect an enhanced, full lump sum payment option of their accrued pension if they retire on or before March 31, 2015. Eligible participants are required to accept the offer by March 6, 2015. Our 2015 results will include special termination benefits as a result of this offer.

In October 2013, we offered an opportunity for certain retirement-eligible employees to elect a full lump sum payment of their accrued pension if they retired as of December 30, 2013. The lump sum value was calculated using the August 2012 discount rates for some pension programs and was equal to the cash balance amount for the management new hire pension program. The lump sum value totaled approximately $2,700, which was distributed in 2014. We recorded special termination benefits of $15 in 2014 and $250 in 2013 as a result of this offer.

In October 2013, as part of our 2014 annual benefits enrollment process, we communicated an amendment to our Medicare-eligible retirees that beginning in 2015 AT&T will provide access to retiree health insurance coverage that supplements government-sponsored Medicare through a private insurance marketplace. The plan was further amended in 2014 to include access to dental benefits through the private insurance marketplace. This new approach will allow retirees to choose insurance with the terms, cost and coverage that best fits their needs, while still receiving financial support as determined by AT&T. We expect that the cost to AT&T for retiree medical coverage in 2015 will be comparable to 2014. Future changes in support, if any, will be based on a number of factors such as business conditions, government actions, marketplace changes and the general consumer inflation rate.



In the fourth quarter of 2014, we changed the method we use to estimate the service and interest components of net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefits. This change compared to the previous method resulted in a decrease in the service and interest components for pension cost in the fourth quarter. Historically, we estimated these service and interest cost components utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. We have elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. We have made this change to provide a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows to the corresponding spot yield curve rates. This change does not affect the measurement of our total benefit obligations or our annual net periodic benefit cost as the change in the service and interest costs is completely offset in the actuarial (gain) loss reported. We have accounted for this change as a change in accounting estimate that is inseparable from a change in accounting principle and accordingly have accounted for it prospectively.

## Obligations and Funded Status

For defined benefit pension plans, the benefit obligation is the “projected benefit obligation,” the actuarial present value, as of our December 31 measurement date, of all benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula to employee service rendered to that date. The amount of benefit to be paid depends on a number of future events incorporated into the pension benefit formula, including estimates of the average life of employees/survivors and average years of service rendered. It is measured based on assumptions concerning future interest rates and future employee compensation levels.

For postretirement benefit plans, the benefit obligation is the “accumulated postretirement benefit obligation,” the actuarial present value as of a date of all future benefits attributed under the terms of the postretirement benefit plan to employee service rendered to the valuation date.

The following table presents this reconciliation and shows the change in the projected benefit obligation for the years ended December 31:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Benefit obligation at beginning of year</td><td>56,560</td><td>58,911</td><td>30,285</td><td>37,431</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost - benefits earned during the period</td><td>1,134</td><td>1,321</td><td>233</td><td>352</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost on projected benefit obligation</td><td>2,470</td><td>2,429</td><td>1,458</td><td>1,532</td></tr><tr><td>Amendments</td><td>(73)</td><td>—</td><td>(617)</td><td>(4,460)</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial (gain) loss</td><td>6,269</td><td>(2,390)</td><td>1,822</td><td>(2,098)</td></tr><tr><td>Special termination benefits</td><td>17</td><td>255</td><td>—</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Benefits paid</td><td>(6,543)</td><td>(3,966)</td><td>(2,298)</td><td>(2,473)</td></tr><tr><td>Transfer for sale of Connecticut wireline operations</td><td>(293)</td><td>—</td><td>(174)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Plan transfers</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Benefit obligation at end of year</td><td>59,543</td><td>56,560</td><td>30,709</td><td>30,285</td></tr></table>

The following table presents the change in the value of plan assets for the years ended December 31 and the plans’ funded status at December 31:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year</td><td>$ 47,238</td><td>$45,060</td><td>$ 8,960</td><td>$ 9,295</td></tr><tr><td>Actual return on plan assets</td><td>4,213</td><td>5,935</td><td>384</td><td>1,347</td></tr><tr><td>Benefits paid \( ^{1} \)</td><td>(6,543)</td><td>(3,966)</td><td>(1,498)</td><td>(1,682)</td></tr><tr><td>Contributions</td><td>562</td><td>209</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Transfer for sale of Connecticut wireline operations</td><td>(308)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets at end of year \( ^{3} \)</td><td>45,163</td><td>47,238</td><td>7,846</td><td>8,960</td></tr><tr><td>Unfunded status at end of year \( ^{2} \)</td><td>(14,380)</td><td>(9,322)</td><td>(22,863)</td><td>(21,325)</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  At our discretion, certain postretirement benefits may be paid from AT&T cash accounts, which does not reduce Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) assets. Future benefit payments may be made from VEBA trusts and thus reduce those asset balances.

 \( ^{2} \)  Funded status is not indicative of our ability to pay ongoing pension benefits or of our obligation to fund retirement trusts. Required pension funding is determined in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) regulations.

 \( ^{3} \)  Net assets available for benefits were 54,184 at December 31, 2014 and 56,447 at December 31, 2013 and include the preferred equity interest in AT&T Mobility II LLC discussed below, which was valued at 9,021 and 9,209, respectively.



In July 2014, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published in the Federal Register their final retroactive approval of our September 9, 2013 voluntary contribution of a preferred equity interest in AT&T Mobility II LLC, the primary holding company for our wireless business, to the trust used to pay pension benefits under our qualified pension plans. The preferred equity interest had a value of $9,104 on the contribution date and was valued at $9,021 at December 31, 2014. The trust is entitled to receive cumulative cash distributions of $560 per annum, which will be distributed quarterly in equal amounts and will be accounted for as contributions. We distributed $560 to the trust during 2014. So long as we make the distributions, we will have no limitations on our ability to declare a dividend, or repurchase shares. This preferred equity interest is a plan asset under ERISA and is recognized as such in the plan’s separate financial statements. However, because the preferred equity interest is not unconditionally transferable to an unrelated party (see Note 14), it is not reflected in plan assets in our consolidated financial statements and instead has been eliminated in consolidation. At the time of the contribution of the preferred equity interest, we made an additional cash contribution of $175 and have agreed to annual cash contributions of $175 no later than the due date for our federal income tax return for each of 2014, 2015 and 2016. These contributions combined with our existing pension assets are in excess of 90% of the pension obligation at December 31, 2014.

As noted above, this preferred equity interest represents a plan asset of our pension trust, which is recognized in the separate financial statements of our pension plan as a qualified plan asset for funding purposes. The following table presents a reconciliation of our pension plan assets recognized in the consolidated financial statements of the Company with the net assets available for benefits included in the separate financial statements of the pension plan at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Plan assets recognized in the consolidated financial statements</td><td>$45,163</td><td>$47,238</td></tr><tr><td>Preferred equity interest in Mobility</td><td>9,021</td><td>9,209</td></tr><tr><td>Net assets available for benefits</td><td>$54,184</td><td>$56,447</td></tr></table>

Amounts recognized on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31 are listed below:

<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Current portion of employee benefit obligation \( ^{1} \)</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ (1,842) \)</td><td>$ (1,949) \)</td></tr><tr><td>Employee benefit obligation \( ^{2} \)</td><td>(14,380)</td><td>(9,322)</td><td>(21,021)</td><td>(19,376)</td></tr><tr><td>Net amount recognized</td><td>$ (14,380) \)</td><td>$ (9,322) \)</td><td>$ (22,863) \)</td><td>$ (21,325) \)</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{3} \)  Included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.”

 \( ^{2} \)  Included in “Postemployment benefit obligation.”

The accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans represents the actuarial present value of benefits based on employee service and compensation as of a certain date and does not include an assumption about future compensation levels. The accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans was $57,949 at December 31, 2014, and $55,077 at December 31, 2013.

## Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income

## Periodic Benefit Costs

Our combined net pension and postretirement (credit) cost recognized in our consolidated statements of income was $7,232, $ (7,390) and $10,257 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. A portion of pension and postretirement benefit costs is capitalized as part of the benefit load on internal construction and capital expenditures, providing a small reduction in the net expense recorded. The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="3">Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost - benefits earned during the period</td><td>$ 1,134</td><td>$ 1,321</td><td>$ 1,216</td><td>$ 233</td><td>$ 352</td><td>$ 336</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost on projected benefit obligation</td><td>2,470</td><td>2,429</td><td>2,800</td><td>1,458</td><td>1,532</td><td>1,725</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on assets</td><td>(3,380)</td><td>(3,312)</td><td>(3,520)</td><td>(653)</td><td>(706)</td><td>(811)</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit</td><td>(94)</td><td>(94)</td><td>(15)</td><td>(1,448)</td><td>(1,161)</td><td>(927)</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial (gain) loss</td><td>5,419</td><td>(5,013)</td><td>5,206</td><td>2,093</td><td>(2,738)</td><td>4,247</td></tr><tr><td>Net pension and postretirement (credit) cost</td><td>$ 5,549</td><td>$(4,669)</td><td>$ 5,687</td><td>$ 1,683</td><td>$(2,721)</td><td>$4,570</td></tr></table>



## Other Changes in Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the after-tax changes in benefit obligations recognized in OCI and the after-tax prior service credits that were amortized from OCI into net periodic benefit costs:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="3">Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$583</td><td>$641</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$6,812</td><td>$4,766</td><td>$3,655</td></tr><tr><td>Prior service (cost) credit</td><td>45</td><td>—</td><td>559</td><td>383</td><td>2,765</td><td>1,686</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit</td><td>(58)</td><td>(58)</td><td>(10)</td><td>(898)</td><td>(719)</td><td>(575)</td></tr><tr><td>Reclassification to income of prior service credit</td><td>5</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(40)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss</td><td>(8)</td><td>(58)</td><td>549</td><td>(555)</td><td>2,046</td><td>1,111</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$575</td><td>$583</td><td>$641</td><td>$6,257</td><td>$6,812</td><td>$4,766</td></tr></table>

The estimated prior service credits that will be amortized from accumulated OCI into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $104 ($64 net of tax) for pension and $1,274 ($790 net of tax) for postretirement benefits.

## Assumptions

In determining the projected benefit obligation and the net pension and postemployment benefit cost, we used the following significant weighted-average assumptions:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="3">Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average discount rate for determining projected benefit obligation at December 31</td><td>4.30%</td><td>5.00%</td><td>4.30%</td><td>4.20%</td><td>5.00%</td><td>4.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate in effect for determining net cost \( ^{1} \)</td><td>4.60%</td><td>4.30%</td><td>5.30%</td><td>5.00%</td><td>4.30%</td><td>5.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td><td>8.25%</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td><td>8.25%</td></tr><tr><td>Composite rate of compensation increase for determining projected benefit obligation</td><td>3.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td></td><td>3.00%</td></tr><tr><td>Composite rate of compensation increase for determining net pension cost (benefit)</td><td>3.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td>4.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td>3.00%</td><td>4.00%</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Weighted-average discount rate of 5.00% in effect from January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014. Discount rate of 3.50% in effect from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

We recognize gains and losses on pension and postretirement plan assets and obligations immediately in our operating results. These gains and losses are measured annually as of December 31 and accordingly will be recorded during the fourth quarter, unless earlier remeasurements are required.

Discount Rate Our assumed weighted-average discount rate for pension and postretirement benefits of 4.30% and 4.20% respectively, at December 31, 2014, reflects the hypothetical rate at which the projected benefit obligation could be effectively settled or paid out to participants. We determined our discount rate based on a range of factors, including a yield curve composed of the rates of return on several hundred high-quality, fixed income corporate bonds available at the measurement date and corresponding to the related expected durations of future cash outflows. These bonds were all rated at least Aa3 or AA- by one of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations, denominated in U.S. dollars, and neither callable, convertible nor index linked. For the year ended December 31, 2014, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, we decreased our pension discount rate by 0.70%, resulting in an increase in our pension plan benefit obligation of $4,854 and decreased our postretirement discount rate 0.80%, resulting in an increase in our postretirement benefit obligation of $2,786. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we increased our pension and postretirement discount rates by 0.70%, resulting in a decrease in our pension plan benefit obligation of $4,533 and a decrease in our postretirement benefit obligation of $3,161.

Expected Long-Term Rate of Return Our expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is 7.75% for 2015 and 2014. Our expected long-term rate of return on postretirement plan assets was adjusted to 5.75% for 2015 from 7.75% for 2014 to reflect changes in the plan asset mix. Our long-term rates of return reflect the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested, or to be invested, to provide for the benefits included in the projected benefit obligations. In setting the long-term assumed rate of return, management considers capital markets future expectations and the asset mix of the plans' investments. Actual long-term return can, in relatively



stable markets, also serve as a factor in determining future expectations. We consider many factors that include, but are not limited to, historical returns on plan assets, current market information on long-term returns (e.g., long-term bond rates) and current and target asset allocations between asset categories. The target asset allocation is determined based on consultations with external investment advisers. If all other factors were to remain unchanged, we expect that a 0.50% decrease in the expected long-term rate of return would cause 2015 combined pension and postretirement cost to increase $250. However, any differences in the rate and actual returns will be included with the actuarial gain or loss recorded in the fourth quarter when our plans are remeasured.

Composite Rate of Compensation Increase Our expected composite rate of compensation increase cost of 3.00% in 2015 and 2014 reflects the long-term average rate of salary increases.

Mortality Tables At December 31, 2014 we updated our assumed mortality rates to reflect our best estimate of future mortality, which increased our pension obligation by $1,442 and increased our postretirement obligations by $53. At December 31, 2013, we also updated our mortality rates, which increased our pension obligation by $1,986 and increased our postretirement obligations by $679.

Healthcare Cost Trend Our healthcare cost trend assumptions are developed based on historical cost data, the near-term outlook and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Due to historical experience, updated expectations of healthcare industry inflation and changes in physician prescribing patterns, we are lowering our 2015 assumed annual healthcare medical cost trend and ultimate trend rate to 4.50%. Our 2015 assumed annual healthcare prescription drug cost trend for non-Medicare eligible participants will increase to 6.0%, trending to our ultimate trend rate of 4.50% in 2021 and for Medicare-eligible participants will lower to an assumed annual and ultimate trend of 4.50%. This change in assumption decreased our obligation by $424. In 2014 our assumed annual healthcare cost trend rate was 5.00% and our ultimate trend rate was 5.00%. In addition to the healthcare cost trend in 2014, we assumed an annual 2.50% growth in administrative expenses and an annual 3.00% growth in dental claims.
A one percentage-point change in the assumed combined medical and dental cost trend rate would have the following effects:

<table><tr><td></td><td>One Percentage-Point Increase</td><td>One Percentage-Point Decrease</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in total of service and interest cost components</td><td>$ 79</td><td>$ (67)</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation</td><td>796</td><td>(707)</td></tr></table>

## Plan Assets

Plan assets consist primarily of private and public equity, government and corporate bonds, and real assets (real estate and natural resources). The asset allocations of the pension plans are maintained to meet ERISA requirements. Any plan contributions, as determined by ERISA regulations, are made to a pension trust for the benefit of plan participants. As part of our voluntary contribution of the Mobility preferred equity interest, we will contribute $735 of cash distributions during 2015. We do not have additional significant required contributions to our pension plans for 2015.

We maintain VEBA trusts to partially fund postretirement benefits; however, there are no ERISA or regulatory requirements that these postretirement benefit plans be funded annually.

The principal investment objectives are to ensure the availability of funds to pay pension and postretirement benefits as they become due under a broad range of future economic scenarios, to maximize long-term investment return with an acceptable level of risk based on our pension and postretirement obligations, and to be broadly diversified across and within the capital markets to insulate asset values against adverse experience in any one market. Each asset class has broadly diversified characteristics. Substantial biases toward any particular investing style or type of security are sought to be avoided by managing the aggregation of all accounts with portfolio benchmarks. Asset and benefit obligation forecasting studies are conducted periodically, generally every two to three years, or when significant changes have occurred in market conditions, benefits, participant demographics or funded status. Decisions regarding investment policy are made with an understanding of the effect of asset allocation on funded status, future contributions and projected expenses. The current asset allocation policy and risk level for the pension plan and VEBA assets is based on a study completed and approved during 2013 and is reflected in the table below.



The plans’ weighted-average asset targets and actual allocations as a percentage of plan assets, including the notional exposure of future contracts by asset categories at December 31, are as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Pension Assets</td><td colspan="3">Postretirement (VEBA) Assets</td></tr><tr><td>Target</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>Target</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic</td><td>21% - 31%</td><td>23%</td><td>25%</td><td>24% - 34%</td><td>29%</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>International</td><td>10% - 20%</td><td>14</td><td>16</td><td>15% - 25%</td><td>20</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities</td><td>34% - 44%</td><td>38</td><td>33</td><td>24% - 34%</td><td>29</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>Real assets</td><td>6% - 16%</td><td>11</td><td>11</td><td>0% - 6%</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Private equity</td><td>4% - 14%</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>0% - 8%</td><td>3</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>0% - 5%</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>12% - 22%</td><td>18</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td></td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td><td></td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td></tr></table>

At December 31, 2014, AT&T securities represented less than 0.5% of assets held by our pension plans and VEBA trusts included in these financial statements.

## Investment Valuation

Investments are stated at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. See “Fair Value Measurements” for further discussion.

Investments in securities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price on the last business day of the year. If no sale was reported on that date, they are valued at the last reported bid price. Investments in securities not traded on a national securities exchange are valued using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Shares of registered investment companies are valued based on quoted market prices, which represent the net asset value of shares held at year-end. Over-the-counter (OTC) securities and government obligations are valued at the bid price or the average of the bid and asked price on the last business day of the year from published sources where available and, if not available, from other sources considered reliable. Depending on the types and contractual terms of OTC derivatives, fair value is measured using valuation techniques, such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model, simulation models or a combination of various models.

Common/collective trust funds, pooled separate accounts and other commingled (103-12) investment entities are valued at quoted redemption values that represent the net asset values of units held at year-end which management has determined approximates fair value.
Alternative investments, including investments in private equity, real estate, natural resources (included in real assets), mezzanine and distressed debt (included in partnerships/joint ventures), limited partnership interest, fixed income securities and hedge funds do not have readily available market values. These estimated fair values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for these investments existed, and such differences could be material. Alternative investments not having an established market are valued at fair value as determined by the investment managers. Private equity, mezzanine and distressed investments are often valued initially by the investment managers based upon cost. Thereafter, investment managers may use available market data to determine adjustments to carrying value based upon observations of the trading multiples of public companies considered comparable to the private companies being valued. Such market data used to determine adjustments to accounts for cash flows and company-specified issues include current operating performance and future expectations of the investments, changes in market outlook, and the third-party financing environment. Private equity partnership holdings may also include publicly held equity investments in liquid markets that are marked-to-market at quoted public values, subject to adjustments for large positions held. Real estate and natural resource direct investments are valued either at amounts based upon appraisal reports prepared by independent third-party appraisers or at amounts as determined by internal appraisals performed by the investment manager, which have been agreed to by an external valuation consultant. Fixed income securities valuation is based upon pricing provided by an external pricing service when such pricing is available. In the event a security is too thinly traded or narrowly held to be priced by such a pricing service, or the price furnished by such external pricing services is deemed inaccurate, the managers will then solicit broker/dealer quotes (spreads or prices). In cases



where such quotes are available, fair value will be determined based solely upon such quotes provided. Managers will typically use a pricing matrix for determining fair value in cases where an approved pricing service or a broker/dealer is unable to provide a fair valuation for specific fixed-rate securities such as many private placements. New fixed-rate securities will be initially valued at cost at the time of purchase. Thereafter, each bond will be assigned a spread from a pricing matrix that will be added to current Treasury rates. The pricing matrix derives spreads for each bond based on external market data, including the current credit rating for the bonds, credit spreads to Treasuries for each credit rating, sector add-ons or credits, issue specific add-ons or credits as well as call or other options.
Purchases and sales of securities are recorded as of the trade date. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the basis of average cost. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Non-interest bearing cash and overdrafts are valued at cost, which approximates fair value.

## Fair Value Measurements

See Note 10 for a discussion of fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.

The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the pension and postretirement assets and liabilities at fair value as of December 31, 2014:

<table><tr><td>Pension Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of December 31, 2014</td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Non-interest bearing cash</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 45</td></tr><tr><td>Interest bearing cash</td><td>—</td><td>127</td><td>—</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency contracts</td><td>—</td><td>25</td><td>—</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic equities</td><td>8,613</td><td>74</td><td>—</td><td>8,687</td></tr><tr><td>International equities</td><td>4,805</td><td>171</td><td>—</td><td>4,976</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>610</td><td>1</td><td>611</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>1,741</td><td>—</td><td>1,741</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>418</td><td>—</td><td>418</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage obligations/REMICS</td><td>—</td><td>531</td><td>—</td><td>531</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate and other fixed income instruments and funds</td><td>97</td><td>7,210</td><td>441</td><td>7,748</td></tr><tr><td>Government and municipal bonds</td><td>145</td><td>4,876</td><td>—</td><td>5,021</td></tr><tr><td>Private equity funds</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5,399</td><td>5,399</td></tr><tr><td>Real estate and real assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>4,845</td><td>4,845</td></tr><tr><td>Commingled funds</td><td>—</td><td>5,823</td><td>2</td><td>5,825</td></tr><tr><td>Securities lending collateral</td><td>310</td><td>3,140</td><td>—</td><td>3,450</td></tr><tr><td>Receivable for variation margin</td><td>6</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Purchased options</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Assets at fair value</td><td>14,022</td><td>24,746</td><td>10,688</td><td>49,456</td></tr><tr><td>Investments sold short and other liabilities at fair value</td><td>(650)</td><td>(260)</td><td>—</td><td>(910)</td></tr><tr><td>Total plan net assets at fair value</td><td>$13,372</td><td>$24,486</td><td>$10,688</td><td>$ 48,546</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets (liabilities) \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(3,383)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Plan Net Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>$45,163</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Other assets (liabilities) include amounts receivable, accounts payable and net adjustment for securities lending payable.



<table><tr><td>Postretirement Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of December 31, 2014</td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Interest bearing cash</td><td>$ 278</td><td>$1,198</td><td>$ —</td><td>$1,476</td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic equities</td><td>1,606</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,606</td></tr><tr><td>International equities</td><td>1,405</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,405</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>46</td><td>—</td><td>46</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>113</td><td>—</td><td>113</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage obligations</td><td>—</td><td>50</td><td>1</td><td>51</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate and other fixed income instruments and funds</td><td>—</td><td>397</td><td>—</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>Government and municipal bonds</td><td>—</td><td>614</td><td>1</td><td>615</td></tr><tr><td>Commingled funds</td><td>—</td><td>1,960</td><td>1</td><td>1,961</td></tr><tr><td>Private equity assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>218</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>Real assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>96</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>Securities lending collateral</td><td>—</td><td>173</td><td>—</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>Total plan net assets at fair value</td><td>$3,289</td><td>$4,551</td><td>$317</td><td>$8,157</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets (liabilities) \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(311)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Plan Net Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>$7,846</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Other assets (liabilities) include amounts receivable, accounts payable and net adjustment for securities lending payable.

The tables below set forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Level 3 pension and postretirement assets for the year ended December 31, 2014:

<table><tr><td>Pension Assets</td><td>Equities</td><td>Fixed Income Funds</td><td>Private Equity Funds</td><td>Real Estate and Real Assets</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 547</td><td>$ 5,724</td><td>$ 5,194</td><td>$ 11,465</td></tr><tr><td>Realized gains (losses)</td><td>—</td><td>41</td><td>696</td><td>806</td><td>1,543</td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized gains (losses)</td><td>—</td><td>(1)</td><td>(76)</td><td>(246)</td><td>(323)</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers in</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>22</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers out</td><td>—</td><td>(3)</td><td>(22)</td><td>—</td><td>(25)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases</td><td>1</td><td>55</td><td>531</td><td>678</td><td>1,265</td></tr><tr><td>Sales</td><td>(1)</td><td>(195)</td><td>(1,454)</td><td>(1,609)</td><td>(3,259)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 444</td><td>$5,399</td><td>$4,845</td><td>$10,688</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Postretirement Assets</td><td>Fixed Income Funds</td><td>Private Equity Funds</td><td>Real Assets</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 26</td><td>$ 309</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 446</td></tr><tr><td>Realized gains (losses)</td><td>—</td><td>45</td><td>(3)</td><td>42</td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized gains (losses)</td><td>1</td><td>(29)</td><td>11</td><td>(17)</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers out</td><td>(1)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases</td><td>—</td><td>6</td><td>—</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Sales</td><td>(23)</td><td>(113)</td><td>(23)</td><td>(159)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 218</td><td>$ 96</td><td>$ 317</td></tr></table>



The following tables set forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the pension and postretirement assets and liabilities at fair value as of December 31, 2013:

<table><tr><td>Pension Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of December 31, 2013</td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Non-interest bearing cash</td><td>$ 65</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 65</td></tr><tr><td>Interest bearing cash</td><td>—</td><td>324</td><td>—</td><td>324</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency contracts</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic equities</td><td>9,841</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>9,844</td></tr><tr><td>International equities</td><td>6,431</td><td>7</td><td>—</td><td>6,438</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>553</td><td>3</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>2,470</td><td>—</td><td>2,470</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>364</td><td>—</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage obligations/REMICS</td><td>—</td><td>514</td><td>—</td><td>514</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate and other fixed income instruments and funds</td><td>154</td><td>5,147</td><td>540</td><td>5,841</td></tr><tr><td>Government and municipal bonds</td><td>15</td><td>4,566</td><td>—</td><td>4,581</td></tr><tr><td>Private equity funds</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5,724</td><td>5,724</td></tr><tr><td>Real estate and real assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5,194</td><td>5,194</td></tr><tr><td>Commingled funds</td><td>—</td><td>6,358</td><td>4</td><td>6,362</td></tr><tr><td>Securities lending collateral</td><td>390</td><td>3,074</td><td>—</td><td>3,464</td></tr><tr><td>Receivable for variation margin</td><td>12</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>Assets at fair value</td><td>16,908</td><td>23,383</td><td>11,465</td><td>51,756</td></tr><tr><td>Investments sold short and other liabilities at fair value</td><td>(619)</td><td>(5)</td><td>—</td><td>(624)</td></tr><tr><td>Total plan net assets at fair value</td><td>$16,289</td><td>$23,378</td><td>$11,465</td><td>$51,132</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets (liabilities) \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(3,894)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Plan Net Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>$47,238</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Other assets (liabilities) include amounts receivable, accounts payable and net adjustment for securities lending payable.

<table><tr><td>Postretirement Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of December 31, 2013</td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Interest bearing cash</td><td>$ 405</td><td>$ 2,073</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 2,478</td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Domestic equities</td><td>1,609</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,609</td></tr><tr><td>International equities</td><td>1,527</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1,527</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>35</td><td>2</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage-backed securities</td><td>—</td><td>110</td><td>—</td><td>110</td></tr><tr><td>Collateralized mortgage obligations</td><td>—</td><td>53</td><td>3</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate and other fixed income instruments and funds</td><td>—</td><td>367</td><td>18</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>Government and municipal bonds</td><td>—</td><td>558</td><td>1</td><td>559</td></tr><tr><td>Commingled funds</td><td>—</td><td>1,899</td><td>2</td><td>1,901</td></tr><tr><td>Private equity assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>309</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>Real assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>111</td><td>111</td></tr><tr><td>Securities lending collateral</td><td>19</td><td>372</td><td>—</td><td>391</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign exchange contracts receivable</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Assets at fair value</td><td>3,563</td><td>5,467</td><td>446</td><td>9,476</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign exchange contracts payable</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Liabilities at fair value</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Total plan net assets at fair value</td><td>$ 3,560</td><td>$ 5,467</td><td>$ 446</td><td>$ 9,473</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets (liabilities) \( ^{1} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(513)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Plan Net Assets</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>$ 8,960</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Other assets (liabilities) include amounts receivable, accounts payable and net adjustment for securities lending payable.



The tables below set forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Level 3 pension and postretirement assets for the year ended December 31, 2013:

<table><tr><td>Pension Assets</td><td>Equities</td><td>Fixed Income Funds</td><td>Private Equity Funds</td><td>Real Estate and Real Assets</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ -</td><td>$1,042</td><td>$ 5,797</td><td>$4,766</td><td>$11,605</td></tr><tr><td>Realized gains (losses)</td><td>(3)</td><td>53</td><td>390</td><td>122</td><td>562</td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized gains (losses)</td><td>3</td><td>(8)</td><td>546</td><td>525</td><td>1,066</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers in</td><td>-</td><td>5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers out</td><td>-</td><td>(442)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>(442)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases</td><td>-</td><td>75</td><td>1,214</td><td>354</td><td>1,643</td></tr><tr><td>Sales</td><td>-</td><td>(178)</td><td>(2,223)</td><td>(573)</td><td>(2,974)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 547</td><td>$ 5,724</td><td>$5,194</td><td>$11,465</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Postretirement Assets</td><td>Fixed Income Funds</td><td>Private Equity Funds</td><td>Real Assets</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 474</td></tr><tr><td>Realized gains (losses)</td><td>—</td><td>2</td><td>12</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>Unrealized gains (losses)</td><td>1</td><td>58</td><td>4</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers in</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Transfers out</td><td>(1)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(1)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases</td><td>5</td><td>89</td><td>27</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>Sales</td><td>(1)</td><td>(183)</td><td>(42)</td><td>(226)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ 26</td><td>$ 309</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 446</td></tr></table>

## Estimated Future Benefit Payments

Expected benefit payments are estimated using the same assumptions used in determining our benefit obligation at December 31, 2014. Because benefit payments will depend on future employment and compensation levels, average years employed, average life spans, and payment elections, among other factors, changes in any of these factors could significantly affect these expected amounts. The following table provides expected benefit payments under our pension and postretirement plans:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Pension Benefits</td><td>Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>$ 5,741</td><td>$2,134</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>4,184</td><td>2,063</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>4,144</td><td>2,000</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>4,066</td><td>1,962</td></tr><tr><td>2019</td><td>4,010</td><td>1,952</td></tr><tr><td>Years 2020 - 2024</td><td>19,753</td><td>9,324</td></tr></table>

## Supplemental Retirement Plans

We also provide certain senior- and middle-management employees with nonqualified, unfunded supplemental retirement and savings plans. While these plans are unfunded, we have assets in a designated nonbankruptcy remote trust that are independently managed and used to provide for these benefits. These plans include supplemental pension benefits as well as compensation-deferral plans, some of which include a corresponding match by us based on a percentage of the compensation deferral.

We use the same significant assumptions for the composite rate of compensation increase in determining our projected benefit obligation and the net pension and postemployment benefit cost. Our discount rates of 4.1% at December 31, 2014 and 5.0% at December 31, 2013 were calculated using the same methodologies used in calculating the discount rate for our qualified pension and postretirement benefit plans. The following tables provide the plans' benefit obligations and fair value of assets at December 31 and the components of the supplemental retirement pension benefit cost. The net amounts are recorded as "Other noncurrent liabilities" on our consolidated balance sheets.

The following table provides information for our supplemental retirement plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Projected benefit obligation</td><td>$ (2,458)</td><td>$ (2,280)</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated benefit obligation</td><td>(2,410)</td><td>(2,227)</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr></table>



The following tables present the components of net periodic benefit cost and other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI:

<table><tr><td>Net Periodic Benefit Cost</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost - benefits earned during the period</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost on projected benefit obligation</td><td>109</td><td>101</td><td>116</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost (credit)</td><td>(1)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial (gain) loss</td><td>243</td><td>(106)</td><td>230</td></tr><tr><td>Net supplemental retirement pension cost</td><td>$358</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$356</td></tr><tr><td>Other Changes Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Prior service (cost) credit</td><td>$ (11)</td><td>$ (1)</td><td>$ (1)</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost (credit)</td><td>(1)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss (net of tax)</td><td>$ (12)</td><td>$ (1)</td><td>$ (1)</td></tr></table>

The estimated prior service cost for our supplemental retirement plan benefits that will be amortized from accumulated OCI into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $1.

Deferred compensation expense was $121 in 2014, $122 in 2013 and $118 in 2012. Our deferred compensation liability, included in “Other noncurrent liabilities,” was $1,156 at December 31, 2014, and $1,118 at December 31, 2013.

## Contributory Savings Plans

We maintain contributory savings plans that cover substantially all employees. Under the savings plans, we match in cash or company stock a stated percentage of eligible employee contributions, subject to a specified ceiling. There are no debt-financed shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plans, allocated or unallocated.

Our match of employee contributions to the savings plans is fulfilled with purchases of our stock on the open market or company cash. Benefit cost is based on the cost of shares or units allocated to participating employees' accounts and was $654, $654 and $634 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

## NOTE 13. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

Under our various plans, senior and other management employees and nonemployee directors have received nonvested stock and stock units. We grant performance stock units, which are nonvested stock units, based upon our stock price at the date of grant and award them in the form of AT&T common stock and cash at the end of a three-year period, subject to the achievement of certain performance goals. We treat the cash portion of these awards as a liability. We grant forfeitable restricted stock and stock units, which are valued at the market price of our common stock at the date of grant and vest typically over a two- to seven-year period. We also grant other nonvested stock units and award them in cash at the end of a three-year period, subject to the achievement of certain market based conditions. As of December 31, 2014, we were authorized to issue up to approximately 117 million shares of common stock (in addition to shares that may be issued upon exercise of outstanding options or upon vesting of performance stock units or other nonvested stock units) to officers, employees and directors pursuant to these various plans.

We account for our share-based payment arrangements based on the fair value of the awards on their respective grant date, which may affect our ability to fully realize the value shown on our consolidated balance sheets of deferred tax assets associated with compensation expense. We record a valuation allowance when our future taxable income is not expected to be sufficient to recover the asset. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the current stock price of our common shares will rise to levels sufficient to realize the entire tax benefit currently reflected on our consolidated balance sheets. However, to the extent we generate excess tax benefits (i.e., that additional tax benefits in excess of the deferred taxes associated with compensation expense previously recognized) the potential future impact on income would be reduced.

The compensation cost recognized for those plans was included in operating expenses in our consolidated statements of income, as reflected in the table below. The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of income for share-based payment arrangements was $122 for 2014, compared to $175 for 2013 and $195 for 2012.

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Performance stock units</td><td>$226</td><td>$381</td><td>$397</td></tr><tr><td>Restricted stock and stock units</td><td>93</td><td>80</td><td>102</td></tr><tr><td>Other nonvested stock units</td><td>(1)</td><td>(3)</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$318</td><td>$458</td><td>$511</td></tr></table>

A summary of the status of our nonvested stock units as of December 31, 2014, and changes during the year then ended is presented as follows (shares in millions):

<table><tr><td>Nonvested Stock Units</td><td>Shares</td><td>Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Nonvested at January 1, 2014</td><td>24</td><td>$ 31.93</td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>14</td><td>33.39</td></tr><tr><td>Vested</td><td>(11)</td><td>29.91</td></tr><tr><td>Forfeited</td><td>(1)</td><td>32.60</td></tr><tr><td>Nonvested at December 31, 2014</td><td>26</td><td>$33.52</td></tr></table>



As of December 31, 2014, there was $425 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based payment arrangements granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.27 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the year was $327 for 2014, compared to $336 for 2013 and $333 for 2012.

It is our policy to satisfy share option exercises using our treasury stock. Cash received from stock option exercises was $43 for 2014, $135 for 2013 and $517 for 2012.

## NOTE 14. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Stock Repurchase Program From time to time, we repurchase shares of common stock for distribution through our employee benefit plans or in connection with certain acquisitions. In December 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 300 million shares of our common stock. We began buying back stock under this program in 2012 and completed the purchase of authorized shares that year. In July 2012, our Board of Directors approved a second authorization to repurchase 300 million shares and we completed that program in May 2013. In March 2013, our Board of Directors approved a third authorization to repurchase 300 million shares, under which we repurchased shares during 2014. In March 2014, our Board of Directors approved a fourth authorization to repurchase up to 300 million shares of our common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we had repurchased approximately 48 million shares totaling $1,617 under these authorizations. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we had repurchased approximately 366 million shares totaling $13,028 under these authorizations. Upon completing our acquisition of DIRECTV, our priority will be to use free cash flow (operating cash flows less construction and capital expenditures) after dividends to pay down debt.

To implement these authorizations, we use open market repurchase programs, relying on Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 where feasible. We also use accelerated share repurchase programs with large financial institutions to repurchase our stock.

Authorized Shares There are 14 billion authorized common shares of AT&T stock and 10 million authorized preferred shares of AT&T stock. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, no preferred shares were outstanding.

Dividend Declarations In December 2014, the Company declared an increase in its quarterly dividend to $0.47 per share of common stock. In December 2013, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share of common stock, which reflected an increase from the $0.45 quarterly dividend declared in November 2012.

Preferred Equity Interest The preferred equity interest discussed in Note 12 is not transferable by the trust except through its put and call features, and therefore has been eliminated in consolidation. After a period of five years from the contribution or, if earlier, the date upon which the pension plan trust is fully funded as determined under GAAP, AT&T has a right to purchase from the pension plan trust some or all of the preferred equity interest at the greater of their fair market value or minimum liquidation value plus any unpaid cumulative dividends. In addition, AT&T will have the right to purchase the preferred equity interest in the event AT&T's ownership of Mobility is less than 50% or there is a transaction that results in the transfer of 50% or more of the pension plan trust's assets to an entity not under common control with AT&T (collectively, a change of control). The pension plan trust has the right to require AT&T to purchase the preferred equity interest at the greater of their fair market value or minimum liquidation value plus any unpaid cumulative dividends, and in installments, as specified in the contribution agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following: (1) at any time if the ratio of debt to total capitalization of Mobility exceeds that of AT&T, (2) the date on which AT&T Inc. is rated below investment grade for two consecutive calendar quarters, (3) upon a change of control if AT&T does not exercise its purchase option, or (4) at any time after a seven-year period from the contribution date. In the event AT&T elects or is required to purchase the preferred equity interest, AT&T may elect to settle the purchase price in cash or shares of AT&T common stock or a combination thereof. Because the preferred equity interest was not considered outstanding for accounting purposes at year-end, it did not affect the calculation of earnings per share.

NOTE 15. ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Consolidated Balance Sheets</td><td colspan="2">December 31,</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable</td><td>$14,984</td><td>$11,561</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued payroll and commissions</td><td>1,967</td><td>1,985</td></tr><tr><td>Current portion of employee benefit obligation</td><td>1,842</td><td>1,949</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued interest</td><td>1,597</td><td>1,559</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>3,202</td><td>4,053</td></tr><tr><td>Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities</td><td>$23,592</td><td>$21,107</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Consolidated Statements of Income</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising expense</td><td>$3,272</td><td>$3,268</td><td>$2,910</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense incurred</td><td>$3,847</td><td>$4,224</td><td>$3,707</td></tr><tr><td>Capitalized interest</td><td>(234)</td><td>(284)</td><td>(263)</td></tr><tr><td>Total interest expense</td><td>$3,613</td><td>$3,940</td><td>$3,444</td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td>Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Cash paid during the year for:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest</td><td>$4,099</td><td>$4,302</td><td>$3,714</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes, net of refunds</td><td>1,532</td><td>1,985</td><td>458</td></tr></table>



No customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated revenues in 2014, 2013 or 2012.

Labor Contracts As of January 31, 2015, we employed approximately 253,000 persons. Approximately 53 percent of our employees are represented by the Communications Workers of America, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers or other unions. Contracts covering approximately 41,000 non-Mobility employees will expire during 2015, including approximately 12,000 traditional wireline employees in our five-state Midwest region and 24,000 in our nine-state Southeast region. After expiration of the current agreements, work stoppages or labor disruptions may occur in the absence of new contracts or other agreements being reached.

## NOTE 16. SALES OF EQUIPMENT INSTALLMENT RECEIVABLES

We offer our customers the option to purchase certain wireless devices in installments over a period of up to 30 months, with the right to trade in the original equipment for a new device within a set period and have the remaining unpaid balance satisfied. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, gross equipment installment receivables of $4,265 and $921 were included on our consolidated balance sheets, of which $2,514 and $606 are notes receivable that are included in “Accounts receivable, net.”

On June 27, 2014, we entered into uncommitted agreements pertaining to the sale of equipment installment receivables and related security with Citibank, N.A. and various other relationship banks as purchasers (collectively, the Purchasers) with a funding amount not expected to exceed $2,000 at any given time. Under the agreement, we may transfer the receivables to the Purchasers for cash and additional consideration upon settlement of the receivables. Under the terms of the arrangement, we continue to bill and collect on behalf of our customers for the receivables sold.

The following table sets forth a summary of equipment installment receivables sold during 2014:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>Net receivables sold \( ^{1} \)</td><td>4,126</td></tr><tr><td>Cash proceeds received</td><td>2,528</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred purchase price recorded</td><td>1,629</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Gross receivables sold were $4,707, before deducting the allowance, imputed interest and trade-in right guarantees.

The deferred purchase price was initially recorded at estimated fair value, which was based on remaining installment payments expected to be collected, adjusted by the expected timing and value of device trade-ins, and is subsequently carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The estimated value of the device trade-ins considers prices offered to us by independent third parties that contemplate changes in value after the launch of a device model. The fair value measurements used are considered Level 3 under the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure framework (see Note 10).

At December 31, 2014, our deferred purchase price receivable was $1,606, which is included in “Other Assets” on our consolidated balance sheets. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of selling these equipment installment receivables is limited to the amount of our deferred purchase price at any point in time.

The sales of equipment installment receivables did not have a material impact in our consolidated statements of income or to “Total Assets” reported on our consolidated balance sheets. We reflect the cash flows related to the arrangement as operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows because the cash received from the Purchasers upon both the sale of the receivables and the collection of the deferred purchase price is not subject to significant interest rate risk.

## NOTE 17. TOWER TRANSACTION

On December 16, 2013, we closed our transaction with Crown Castle International Corp. (Crown Castle) in which Crown Castle gained the exclusive rights to lease and operate 9,048 wireless towers and purchased 627 of our wireless towers for $4,827 in cash. The leases have various terms with an average length of approximately 28 years. As the leases expire, Crown Castle will have fixed price purchase options for these towers totaling approximately $4,200, based on their estimated fair market values at the end of the lease terms. We sublease space on the towers from Crown Castle for an initial term of 10 years at current market rates, subject to optional renewals in the future.

We determined our continuing involvement with the tower assets prevented us from achieving sale-leaseback accounting for the transaction, and we accounted for the cash proceeds from Crown Castle as a financing obligation on our consolidated balance sheets. We record interest on the financing obligation using the effective interest method at a rate of approximately 3.90%. The financing obligation is increased by interest expense and estimated future net cash flows generated and retained by Crown Castle from operation of the tower sites, and reduced by our contractual payments. We continue to include the tower assets in Property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets and depreciate them accordingly. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the tower assets had a balance of $999 and $1,039, respectively. Our depreciation expense for these assets was $39 for 2014. The impact of the transaction on our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2013, was not material.



Lease payments under the sublease arrangements were $221 for 2014. At December 31, 2014, the future minimum payments under the sublease arrangement are $225 for 2015, $229 for 2016, $234 for 2017, $239 for 2018, $244 for 2019, and $2,553 thereafter.

## NOTE 18. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

We are party to numerous lawsuits, regulatory proceedings and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In evaluating these matters on an ongoing basis, we take into account amounts already accrued on the balance sheet. In our opinion, although the outcomes of these proceedings are uncertain, they should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We have contractual obligations to purchase certain goods or services from various other parties. Our purchase obligations are expected to be approximately $19,129 in 2015, $21,386 in total for 2016 and 2017, $2,518 in total for 2018 and 2019 and $691 in total for years thereafter.

See Note 10 for a discussion of collateral and credit-risk contingencies.

## NOTE 19. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The following tables represent our quarterly financial results:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="5">2014 Calendar Quarter</td></tr><tr><td>First</td><td>Second</td><td>Third</td><td>Fourth \( ^{2} \)</td><td>Annual</td></tr><tr><td>Total Operating Revenues</td><td>32,476</td><td>32,575</td><td>32,957</td><td>34,439</td><td>13,2447</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Income (Loss)</td><td>6,278</td><td>5,616</td><td>5,402</td><td>(5,550)</td><td>11,746</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss)</td><td>3,734</td><td>3,621</td><td>3,059</td><td>(3,896)</td><td>6,518</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>3,652</td><td>3,547</td><td>3,002</td><td>(3,977)</td><td>6,224</td></tr><tr><td>Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to AT&amp;T \( ^{1} \)</td><td>0.70</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.58</td><td>(0.77)</td><td>1.19</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to AT&amp;T \( ^{1} \)</td><td>0.70</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.58</td><td>(0.77)</td><td>1.19</td></tr><tr><td>Stock Price</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>High</td><td>35.50</td><td>36.86</td><td>37.48</td><td>36.16</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Low</td><td>31.74</td><td>34.32</td><td>34.17</td><td>32.07</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Close</td><td>35.07</td><td>35.36</td><td>35.24</td><td>33.59</td><td></td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} $  Quarterly earnings per share impacts may not add to full-year earnings per share impacts due to the difference in weighted-average common shares for the quarters versus the weighted-average common shares for the year.

 \( ^{2} \)  Includes an actuarial loss on pension and postretirement benefit plans (Note 12) and asset abandonment charges (Note 6).

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="5">2013 Calendar Quarter</td></tr><tr><td>First</td><td>Second</td><td>Third</td><td>Fourth \( ^{2} \)</td><td>Annual</td></tr><tr><td>Total Operating Revenues</td><td>31,356</td><td>32,075</td><td>32,158</td><td>33,163</td><td>128,752</td></tr><tr><td>Operating Income</td><td>5,940</td><td>6,113</td><td>6,188</td><td>12,238</td><td>30,479</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income</td><td>3,773</td><td>3,880</td><td>3,905</td><td>6,995</td><td>18,553</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to AT&amp;T</td><td>3,700</td><td>3,822</td><td>3,814</td><td>6,913</td><td>18,249</td></tr><tr><td>Basic Earnings Per Share Attributable to AT&amp;T \( ^{1} \)</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.72</td><td>1.31</td><td>3.39</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Earnings Per Share Attributable to AT&amp;T \( ^{1} \)</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.72</td><td>1.31</td><td>3.39</td></tr><tr><td>Stock Price</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>High</td><td>36.87</td><td>39.00</td><td>36.31</td><td>36.80</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Low</td><td>32.76</td><td>34.10</td><td>33.19</td><td>33.09</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Close</td><td>36.69</td><td>35.40</td><td>33.82</td><td>35.16</td><td></td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} $  Quarterly earnings per share impacts may not add to full-year earnings per share impacts due to the difference in weighted-average common shares for the quarters versus the weighted-average common shares for the year.

 \( ^{2} \)  Includes an actuarial gain on pension and postretirement benefit plans (Note 12), special termination charges (Note 12) and charges for employee separations.



The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The integrity and objectivity of the data in these financial statements, including estimates and judgments relating to matters not concluded by year end, are the responsibility of management, as is all other information included in the Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated.

The financial statements of AT&T Inc. (AT&T) have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Management has made available to Ernst & Young LLP all of AT&T's financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of stockholders' and directors' meetings. Furthermore, management believes that all representations made to Ernst & Young LLP during its audit were valid and appropriate.

Management maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by AT&T is recorded, processed, summarized, accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Management also seeks to ensure the objectivity and integrity of its financial data by the careful selection of its managers, by organizational arrangements that provide an appropriate division of responsibility and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets periodically with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors to review the manner in which they are performing their respective responsibilities and to discuss auditing, internal accounting controls and financial reporting matters. Both the internal auditors and the independent auditors periodically meet alone with the Audit Committee and have access to the Audit Committee at any time.

## Assessment of Internal Control

The management of AT&T is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. AT&T's internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the company's management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

AT&T management assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on its assessment, AT&T management believes that, as of December 31, 2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting.



Randall Stephenson
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President



John J. Stephens
Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AT&T Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AT&T Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Emet + Young LLP



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AT&T Inc.

We have audited AT&T Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Dallas, Texas
February 20, 2015

Emmatt Young LLP



## Randall L. Stephenson, 54 \( ^{(4)} \) 



Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
AT&T Inc.
Dallas, Texas

Director since 2005
Background: Telecommunications

## Joyce M. Roché, 67 \( ^{(3,4,5)} \) 



Lead Director
Author and Retired President and
Chief Executive Officer
Girls Incorporated

Director since 1998
Southern New England Telecommunications
Director 1997–1998
Background: Marketing

## Reuben V. Anderson \( ^{†} \) , 72 \( ^{(3,4,6)} \) 



Senior Partner
Phelps Dunbar LLP
Director since 2006
BellSouth Corporation

Director 1994–2006
Background: Law

## Jaime Chico Pardo \( ^{*} \) , 65 \( ^{(1)} \) 



Founder and Chief Executive Officer
ENESA
Director since 2008
Background: Telecommunications,
banking

## Scott T. Ford, 52 \( ^{(2,4,5)} \) 



Member and Chief Executive Officer
Westrock Group, LLC
Director since 2012
Background: Telecommunications

## Glenn H. Hutchins, 59 \( ^{(2)} \) 



Co-Founder
Silver Lake
Director since June 2014
Background: Technology,

public policy

## James P. Kelly \( ^{*} \) , 71 \( ^{(1,3)} \) 



Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Director since 2006

BellSouth Corporation Director 2000–2006
Background: Air delivery and freight services

## William E. Kennard, 58 \( ^{(6)} \) 



Former U.S. Ambassador to the European Union
Former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission

Director since November 2014
Background: Law, telecommunications, public policy

## Jon C. Madonna, 71 \( ^{(1,3,4)} \) 



Retired Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
KPMG
Director since 2005

AT&T Corp. Director 2002–2005
Background: Public accounting

## Michael B. McCallister, 62 \( ^{(1,6)} \) 



Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Humana Inc.
Director since 2013

Background: Health care

## John B. McCoy, 71 \( ^{(3,4,5)} \) 



Retired Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Bank One Corporation
Director since 1999

Ameritech Director 1991–1999
Background: Banking

## Beth E. Mooney, 60 \( ^{(2,6)} \) 



Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
KeyCorp
Director since 2013
Background: Banking

## Matthew K. Rose, 55 \( ^{(3,5)} \) 



Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC
Director since 2010

Background: Freight transport

## Cynthia B. Taylor, 53 \( ^{(1,2)} \) 



President and Chief Executive Officer
Oil States International, Inc.
Director since 2013
Background: Public accounting,

oil and gas

## Laura D'Andrea Tyson, Ph.D., 67 \( ^{(1,6)} \) 



Professor of Business Administration and Economics
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley

Director since 1999
Ameritech Director 1997–1999
Background: Economics, education

## Committees of the Board:

(1) Audit
(2) Corporate Development and Finance
(3) Corporate Governance and Nominating
(4) Executive
(5) Human Resources
(6) Public Policy and Corporate Reputation

(Information is provided as of March 10, 2015.)
*Retiring April 24, 2015



Randall Stephenson, 54
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President

Bill Blase Jr., 59
Senior Executive Vice President-
Human Resources

Jim Cicconi, 62
Senior Executive Vice President-
External and Legislative Affairs,
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cathy Coughlin, 57
Senior Executive Vice President
and Global Marketing Officer

Ralph de la Vega, 63
President and Chief Executive Officer,
AT&T Mobile and Business Solutions

John Donovan, 54
Senior Executive Vice President-
AT&T Technology and Operations

David Huntley, 56
Chief Compliance Officer

Lori Lee, 49
Senior Executive Vice President-
Home Solutions

John Stankey, 52
Group President and
Chief Strategy Officer

John Stephens, 55
Senior Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

Wayne Watts, 61
Senior Executive Vice President
and General Counsel



## Stockholder Information

## Toll-Free Stockholder Hotline

Call us at 1-800-351-7221 between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. Central time, Monday through Friday (TDD 1-888-403-9700) for help with:

• Common stock account inquiries

• Requests for assistance with your common stock account, including stock transfers

• Information on The DirectSERVICE \( ^{TM} \)  Investment Program for Stockholders of AT&T Inc. (sponsored and administered by Computershare Trust Company, N.A.)

## Written Stockholder Requests

Please mail all account inquiries and other requests for assistance regarding your stock ownership to:

AT&T Inc.

c/o Computershare
Trust Company, N.A.

P.O. Box 43078

Providence, RI 02940-3078

You may also reach the transfer agent for AT&T Inc. at att@computershare.com or visit the website at www.computershare.com/att

## DirectSERVICE

Investment Program

The DirectSERVICE Investment Program for Stockholders of AT&T Inc. is sponsored and administered by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. The program allows current stockholders to reinvest dividends, purchase additional AT&T Inc. stock or enroll in an individual retirement account. For more information, call 1-800-351-7221.

## Stock Trading Information

AT&T Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Ticker symbol: T

## Information on the Internet

Information about AT&T Inc. is available on the Internet at www.att.com

## Annual Meeting

The annual meeting of stockholders will be held at 9 a.m. local time Friday, April 24, 2015, at:

DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel
Spokane City Center
Grand Ballroom
322 N. Spokane Falls Ct.
Spokane, WA 99201

## SEC Filings

AT&T Inc.'s U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the latest Form 10-K and Proxy Statement, are available on our website at www.att.com/investor.relations

## Investor Relations

Securities analysts and other members of the professional financial community may contact the Investor Relations staff as listed on our website at www.att.com/investor.relations

## Independent Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP
2323 Victory Ave., Suite 2000
Dallas, TX 75219

## Corporate Offices and Non-Stockholder Inquiries

AT&T Inc.
208 S. Akard St.
Dallas, TX 75202
210-821-4105



Annual Report printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer recycled content



MIX
Paper from
responsible sources
FSC \( ^{®} \)  C101537

2 Total 2009-2014 investment including capital investments and acquisitions of wireless spectrum and operations.

3 Includes AT&T’s 5.9 million U-verse video subscribers as of December 31, 2014 and DIRECTV’s 39.1 million subscribers in the U. S. and Latin America as of September 30, 2014, including subscribers of Sky Mexico, in which DIRECTV holds a minority stake.