PVH Corp. (PVH, NYSE)
Industry: Apparel Manufacturing
Annual report, fiscal year 2013



## ANNUAL
REPORT
2013

Growing Global Brands. We Are PVH.



## GROWING
WE
ARE
PVH
GLOBAL
BRANDS



## TABLE OF CONTENTS

03 Letter to Stockholders 12 Calvin Klein 16 Tommy Hilfiger 20 Heritage Brands 24 Corporate Social Responsibility 28 Directors, Officers and Other Information 30 Financial Highlights 30 GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations 33 Annual Report on Form10-K




Calvin Klein Jeans prototype store



Calvin Klein Collection store
Shanghai, China



Calvin Klein store
Metzingen, Germany



Calvin Klein company store
Las Vegas, Nevada



Tommy Hilfiger flagship store
Düsseldorf, Germany



Hilfiger Denim store
Brussels, Belgium



Tommy Hilfiger store
San Diego, California



Tommy Hilfiger flagship store
Los Angeles, California



Calvin Klein store
Sunrise, Florida



Calvin Klein store
San Francisco, California



Calvin Klein Underwear store
Hong Kong, China



Calvin Klein platinum label store
Shanghai, China



# LETTER TO
STOCKHOLDERS

Dear Fellow Stockholders:
2013 represented a year of transition for our company. Our acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (“Warnaco”), gave us direct control over the two largest Calvin Klein apparel categories, jeanswear and underwear, and added the Core Intimates (Warner’s and Olga) and Speedo businesses into our Heritage Brands business.



EMANUEL CHIRICO
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

## 2013 Year in Review

Organizationally, there were significant changes within our largest brand, Calvin Klein, as the business model shifted from being license-driven to a more directly operated business, with direct operations now expanded to Europe, Asia and Latin America. We believe that these changes will lead to stronger and more profitable operations for PVH in both the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses.

While the economic environment continued to be volatile in 2013, with fragile consumer sentiment in most parts of the world, we navigated the obstacles well, as our brand portfolio, led by Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, continued to resonate with consumers worldwide. We exceeded our earnings per share and revenue guidance set forth at the start of the fiscal year, with non-GAAP earnings per share of $7.03.* Our revenues increased over 35% to $8.2 billion, as we added the acquired businesses and saw sustained growth in our core businesses, with consistent profitability and cash flows. We reported earnings before interest and taxes of $967 million, \(^{*} \)  an increase of 29%* over last year, as our strong brand positioning and execution of our business principles drove our financial performance, despite the uncertain macroeconomic environment and the significant strategic investments we have needed to make to upgrade and stabilize the acquired Calvin Klein businesses.

## Status of Warnaco Acquisition

During 2013, we made significant progress integrating the Warnaco businesses into PVH and investing in the infrastructure critical for our long-term global success. Our teams converted systems across North America and Europe, putting associates on common platforms across each business. In 2014, our teams will focus on systems conversions in Asia and our sourcing integration is on track for completion for the Fall 2014 season. We also invested in people, filling many of the over 200 open positions across the acquired businesses, including a President of Calvin Klein Asia and a President of Calvin Klein Europe.




Jeanswear has been a particular focus since the acquisition closed. We have taken strategic actions to reposition Calvin Klein Jeans beginning with the Fall 2014 lines, with improved product and designs that are more consistent with our other Calvin Klein branded product. Our teams have been elevating our sourcing platform to coincide with these improvements and are working to enhance and upgrade our wholesale account distribution and retail presentation. These measures are expected to deliver healthier financial metrics in the U.S. and Europe. Additionally, we have taken actions to eliminate excess inventory levels across the acquired businesses.

Our newly acquired Speedo, Olga and Warner’s businesses are also proceeding well in terms of their integration. Overall, we are pleased with the status of the integration and the advancements we are making, and we remain on track to achieve synergies identified through the acquisition.

## Setting the Stage for Continued Long-Term Growth

During 2013, we took significant steps to strengthen our organization for the long-term and deepen our focus on our global designer lifestyle brands, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger. The Warnaco acquisition provides a broader global platform for both of our designer lifestyle brands and has enabled us to continue to transform from a primarily North American multi-brand business with strong European Tommy Hilfiger operations, to a more diversified, global organization with significant operations in four distinct regions, and with Asia and Latin America now accounting for approximately 20% \( ^{1} \)  of our operating income. As a much larger organization, we continue to operate under our core business principles, which value leaders who hold the highest ethical standards, while also driving results across the business.

We took key steps to enhance and further develop the acquired businesses by making significant investments in their infrastructure, including filling high-profile senior management positions, improving systems and processes and elevating the design and quality of Calvin Klein jeanswear and underwear. These changes will put the brand in a much stronger position to grow globally, strengthen its customer base and thrive over the long-term. With the direct global control of the brand image and commercial operations for the two largest Calvin Klein apparel categories, jeanswear and underwear, our teams took steps to strengthen management, improve operations, unify our brand messaging, and coordinate and improve design, merchandising, retail distribution and marketing functions on a regional and global basis. We believe that these steps, which we will build upon in 2014, will strengthen Calvin Klein's image, positioning and execution across all markets to drive sustainable growth. While we still have additional areas of investment and development planned for 2014, the integration is progressing on track and we are confident that the steps we are taking will position PVH for sustainable long-term financial growth and drive stockholder value.

Another major development was our sale of the G.H. Bass & Co. business in the fourth quarter of 2013, which allows us to further invest in our more profitable apparel businesses, while also reducing sales and earnings volatility.

Total Revenue
2013: $8.2BN
By Region



Operating Income
2013: $967MM*
By Region



● North America
(U.S., Canada and Mexico)
● Europe
(Europe, Middle East and Africa)
● Latin America
(South and Central America and the Caribbean)
● Asia/Rest of World
(Asia, Australia and New Zealand)



2013 was a transformational year, as we reunited the "House of Calvin Klein" and made significant progress integrating the acquired Calvin Klein businesses into PVH.



Tommy Hilfiger continues to hold strong global appeal, as demonstrated by its $6.4 billion of global retail sales in 2013.











● North America
(U.S., Canada and Mexico)
● Europe
(Europe, Middle East and Africa)
● Latin America
(South and Central America and the Caribbean)
● Asia/ Rest of World
(Asia, Australia and New Zealand)



Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger represented over 75% of our 2013 revenue. The global appetite for these two designer lifestyle brands continued to be strong, as Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger posted notable sales and market share gains, while also expanding profitability. In spite of the weak consumer environment, our powerful designer lifestyle brands grew comparable store sales low single-digits on top of challenging multi-year comparisons, driven by compelling product, strong brand awareness, engaging marketing programs and prudent inventory management. Our Heritage Brands business also performed well, despite weakness in Heritage Brands Retail, posting wholesale sales growth and market share gains across most of the categories in which we compete.

We also continued to strengthen our balance sheet, as solid operating results allowed us to pay down $500 million of debt this year, despite the significant investments we made in integrating the Warnaco businesses. This amount was well above our initial projection of $400 million and left us with a 2.8x* net leverage ratio at the end of 2013.

## Calvin Klein

Calvin Klein’s designer lifestyle positioning remains strong, as evidenced by the brand’s global retail sales of $7.8 billion in 2013. Our Calvin Klein business posted strong results, even while integrating the Warnaco businesses, navigating inventory, product and sales challenges across the Calvin Klein global jeanswear business and addressing wholesale account and store performance issues in Europe. Sales growth was driven by strong product execution in men’s and women’s underwear, sportswear and accessories, which conveyed Calvin Klein’s provocative, modern, American designs, new category additions and expansion within existing and into new markets. The consumer appeal for the brand remains high, as demonstrated by Calvin Klein’s #8 ranking on MediaRadar’s “Most Talked About Fashion Brands of 2013” list.

During 2013, our Calvin Klein revenues grew over 140% to $2.8 billion, driven by the acquisition of the Warnaco businesses. We experienced over 60% growth in North America and revenues for the rest of the world grew four-fold. Calvin Klein North America had strong performance both at retail and wholesale, with 3% comparable store sales growth and the pre-acquisition wholesale business posting 8% sales gains, while also growing average unit retail prices. Calvin Klein also continued to post gains in China and Brazil, where the brand’s position is strong, as consumers appreciate its aspirational lifestyle. Strength in these regions helped offset weakness in Europe and the North American jeanswear business, as we restructure and rebrand Calvin Klein Jeans in the marketplace beginning in 2014. With 2013 as a year of transition and investment, Fall 2014 will start to highlight our product innovation — improvements to quality, fit and fashion, particularly in jeanswear — along with an enhanced presentation at retail.

## Tommy Hilfiger

The Tommy Hilfiger brand achieved record global retail sales of $6.4 billion in 2013, which increased 6% over 2012, as we continued to deliver strong product assortments featuring the “preppy with a twist” designs that the brand is known for. Global retail sales were generally strong across all regions, reinforcing our optimism in the long-term growth trajectory of the business. Our North American business was the highlight, as it posted robust sales growth while also improving




operating margins. The tremendous growth occurring in North America has resulted from the investments we have made since acquiring the business in early 2010, particularly in the areas of design, supply chain, distribution and marketing. Complementing the North American business was the continued strength experienced by our European business, in spite of the challenging macro environment.

Revenues for Tommy Hilfiger were $3.4 billion, an increase of 7% against 2012, with 8% growth in North America and 6% growth for the rest of the world. Our two largest geographies, Europe and North America, achieved strong sales growth, with comparable store sales up 6% in Europe and up 4% in North America, despite volatile consumer sentiment and difficult multi-year comparisons in these regions.

We continue to focus on elevating our products, touching existing and new consumers with our eclectic “Hilfiger family” marketing campaigns and investing in the in-store experience to drive the brand globally while continually improving our financial returns. We believe that our largest long-term growth opportunities lie in the high-growth emerging markets of Asia and Latin America. Accordingly, in January 2013, we established a joint venture in Brazil and further supported our existing joint ventures in China and India. While we were pleased with most regions in which we operate, we continue to take actions to reposition and elevate the Tommy Hilfiger brand in Japan, where the brand’s underperformance persists.

## Heritage Brands

Our Heritage Brands business had a defining year in 2013, as we continued to execute on our turnaround plan and also integrated the Core Intimates and Speedo businesses. We also took important steps to align our Izod and Van Heusen wholesale, retail and licensing operations by brand, which should result in more consistent brand messaging, marketing, product assortments and point of sale presentations across channels.

Our Heritage Brands wholesale business strengthened its market position across key categories including dress shirts, neckwear, woven and knit sport shirts, bottoms, underwear, bras and panties. Notably, the pre-acquisition businesses generated sales gains, as the turnaround efforts began to drive improved financial results. We are also pleased with the performance of the newly acquired Speedo, Warner's and Olga businesses, which, like our other Heritage Brands businesses, are more replenishment-based and generally provide consistent profitability, healthy margins and strong cash flows.

The Heritage Brands Retail division, however, continued to post disappointing results. This led to our decision to sell Heritage Brands' biggest retail business, which was also the largest underperformer, G.H. Bass & Co., a footwear-centric business that did not match well with our otherwise apparel-based businesses. As a result of the sale, wholesale is expected to represent over 80% of our Heritage Brands revenue. We continue to focus on rationalizing our Heritage Brands retail store base and improving productivity and profitability at our IZOD and Van Heusen stores.



2013 was a defining year for the Heritage Brands business, as we executed on our turnaround plan, while also adding the Warner's, Olga and Speedo businesses.



We are optimistic about the future and believe that the opportunities identified from the acquisition remain significant and that we will deliver improved long-term financial returns.






## CSR

At PVH, we are committed to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). We have been promoting human rights and worker health and safety for over 20 years, and we continue to seek industry change through various CSR initiatives. CSR is a key consideration in making business decisions, as our company greatly values integrity and accountability. We strive to make a positive impact on the environment and the people in the communities where we live, work and operate.

As an industry leader, we understand our obligation to promote and maintain sustainable business practices that take into account the interests of all of our stakeholders. During 2013, PVH undertook many CSR initiatives, as the acquisition of Warnaco increased our size, supplier base, product offerings and countries of operation, and created unique integration challenges. As we grow, we are taking a broader approach to CSR, which accounts for social, environmental and community impacts across the entire “lifecycle” of our products – from source to store.

We took a key role by being one of the first brand owners to commit to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, a binding agreement to establish a broad factory inspection, safety and training program in Bangladesh's garment manufacturing industry. We also created a Chemicals Management Commitment and Action Plan and joined a coalition of leading brands which are committed to eliminating hazardous chemicals from the supply chain by 2020.

Executing our business strategies in an ethical manner is inherent in our culture; accordingly, we report publicly on our CSR accomplishments, challenges and goals. Transparency in our CSR reporting practices promotes awareness, dialogue and collaborative work toward better practices.
We believe that our dedication to CSR across our brands and businesses will become a key competitive advantage as we strive to deliver future growth and stockholder value.

## 2014 and Beyond

Although 2013 presented us with several hurdles, we took key steps to strengthen our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses, and set out the groundwork to enhance and expand our brands globally. With control over Calvin Klein’s two largest apparel categories, jeanswear and underwear, and expanded operating platforms in Asia and Latin America, we are optimistic about the opportunities to enhance our offerings and improve and expand the global distribution for our two designer lifestyle brands. We believe that the strategic initiatives and plans that we have implemented for all our businesses will enable us to achieve significant increases in revenue and profitability over the long-term.

While we see several headwinds for 2014, as the global macroeconomic environment remains uncertain and our investment spending in the acquired businesses will weigh on our 2014 earnings, particularly in the first half of the year, we are optimistic about the future. The opportunity that we identified from the acquisition remains significant and we intend to continue to repay debt of at least $400 million annually, realizing interest savings, which we intend to reinvest in our high-growth Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses.

Finally, but perhaps most importantly, I would like to recognize the hard work, dedication and commitment from our talented associates globally, who are the lifeblood of our company. Integrating the acquired businesses continues to be a major endeavor, but our associates have managed the integration seamlessly, allowing us to meet or exceed our internal deadlines. Through the combination of our outstanding associates, world-class brands and the execution of our sound business practices, which focus on passion, integrity, individuality, partnership and accountability, we believe that we can continue to grow our brands while also delivering improved long-term financial returns to you, our stockholders.



Emanuel Chirico

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

## WHAT WE VALUE

At PVH, we believe that staying true to our core values maximizes our growth potential, expands our consumer reach and brings increased value to our associates and stockholders. Our five core values – passion, integrity, individuality, partnership and accountability – are woven into the fabric of our organization, shaping our culture and driving us to grow and succeed.



## PROVOCATIVE

## Calvin Klein

2013 was a historic year for Calvin Klein. Our acquisition of Warnaco reunited the “House of Calvin Klein” and gave us direct control over the two largest apparel categories for Calvin Klein, jeanswear and underwear, and enables us to unify the global brand vision. Additionally, the acquisition expanded our direct operations to include Europe, Asia and Latin America from what had been a predominantly licensed business with a strong North American direct business.

Calvin Klein’s non-GAAP earnings before interest and taxes grew to $432 million, \( ^{*} \)  exceeding plan, despite significant investments in the acquired businesses and fragile consumer sentiment across many markets. Revenues grew over 140%, driven by the addition of 1.5 billion in revenues associated with the acquired businesses (net of a reduction in licensing revenues attributable to Warnaco), including strength in underwear, combined with strong performance in the pre-existing North American business. North American retail stores achieved comparable sales growth of 3% on top of a 5% comparable sales gain in 2012, and wholesale sales in the pre-acquisition business grew 8%, globally driven by share gains. Calvin Klein also experienced sharp growth in Brazil and China, where the brand continues to resonate strongly with consumers.



Calvin Klein’s designer lifestyle
positioning remains strong,
with its provocative, modern,
American designs generating
nearly $8 billion in 2013
global retail sales.




Calvin Klein Underwear store; Hong Kong, China

The Calvin Klein brand remains strong worldwide, as demonstrated by its #8 ranking on MediaRadar’s “Most Talked About Fashion Brands of 2013” list, where it was featured alongside premiere global luxury brands. Calvin Klein’s inclusion on the list, which ranks brands based on the number of mentions and photos in top fashion magazines, highlights its strong global appeal and prominence among key tastemakers in the fashion industry. Calvin Klein also celebrated its tenth anniversary under PVH’s ownership. In honor of the milestone, there were over 130 editorials written worldwide about the brand and its creative directors, including a spread in the Wall Street Journal’s WSJ Magazine (December 2013).

2013 was a critical year for the Calvin Klein business, as we laid the groundwork for continued long-term global brand growth. There were significant investments in people, as we hired Presidents of Calvin Klein Asia and Europe, and filled many other key open positions. We initiated improvements within the jeanswear business, including steps to improve sourcing and enhance the quality and design of product. We also invested in systems, infrastructure and customer engagement initiatives. Calvin Klein’s e-commerce operations were also improved, with new functionality added to websites and distribution expanded to additional countries.
Charitable endeavors continued to be part of Calvin Klein’s mission. We partnered with Christy Turlington Burns and her charity, Every Mother Counts, to generate awareness to improve maternal health. Additionally, Calvin Klein sponsored the first-ever gala for Save the Children, which raised over $1.8 million.

In 2014, we intend to further build upon the initiatives for growing the business, particularly reinventing the jeanswear offerings, which represent a significant sales and margin opportunity in the U.S. and Europe. We also intend to relaunch the bridge product lines as Calvin Klein platinum label (formerly ck Calvin Klein), with a greater emphasis on elevated product, consistent quality and enhanced value. Rollouts are planned for Spring 2014 in Asia and Fall 2014 in Europe. We project the business will achieve 8% to 10% annual growth in global retail sales over the next several years as the business builds upon the groundwork we established in 2013.

Calvin Klein
Global Retail Sales
2013: $7.8BN
By Region



● North America
(U.S., Canada and Mexico)
● Europe
(Europe, Middle East and Africa)
● Latin America
(South and Central America and the Caribbean)
● Asia/ Rest of World
(Asia, Australia and New Zealand)

Calvin Klein
Global Retail Sales
2009A - 2017E



2009 - 2013 Sales CAGR: 8%
2013 - 2017 Planned Growth: 8% - 10%



The Calvin Klein brand remains strong worldwide, as demonstrated by its #8 ranking on MediaRadar's "Most Talked About Fashion Brands of 2013" list, where it was featured alongside premiere global luxury brands.

I'm Klein

CalvinKle

in Klein



Our Tommy Hilfiger business posted another strong year in 2013, with growth in North America and Europe and operating margins for the North America business reaching record levels.






## TOMMY HILFIGER

Our Tommy Hilfiger business posted another strong year in 2013, as it leveraged the brand's global awareness and premium positioning in the marketplace. Non-GAAP EBIT increased 10% \( ^{*} $  to 479 million, \( ^{*} \)  with growth in North America and Europe, its two biggest markets, despite consumer weakness in these regions. Revenues grew 7% to 3.4 billion, as the brand experienced share gains across most geographies. In North America, revenues grew 8%, with comparable sales increasing 4% on top of a 10% comparable sales gain in 2012. Operating margins for the North America business reached a new record, as the improvements to streamline design, processes, supply chain and distribution, along with targeted marketing programs, are paying dividends. International revenues grew 6%, with Europe posting a comparable sales gain of 6% on top of 2012's 11% comparable sales increase. The European business outperformed its peers, despite the elevated promotional environment, as the brand's iconic “preppy with a twist” designs continued to resonate strongly with consumers.






Tommy Hilfiger invested in elevating the consumer experience globally, which we believe contributed to its healthy financial performance. This included enhancing store and shop-in-shop environments, upgrading product design and quality, increasing point of sale marketing and expanding the retail footprint. Tommy Hilfiger also invested in its e-commerce websites, which experienced strong year-over-year sales growth, and launched mobile commerce in Europe.

Global retail expansion was an area of focus this year, with the brand opening a new West Coast flagship in Los Angeles, supported by a dedicated advertising campaign and celebrity-studded event. We also celebrated the re-opening of the expanded, digitally augmented Düsseldorf store, which is now the largest Tommy Hilfiger flagship store in Europe and serves as a blueprint for our store design going forward. Tommy Hilfiger also focused on expanding into underpenetrated markets, including through high-profile store openings in Moscow and Seoul, which were marked by opening events that garnered significant media attention.

Global marketing efforts for the Tommy Hilfiger brand were also expanded during 2013, with digital marketing growing to 25% of the overall marketing spend. The cornerstone of Tommy Hilfiger's marketing and advertising efforts is the globally recognized "The Hilfigers" campaign, which features the eclectic "Hilfiger family." The campaign embodies the brand's "classic American cool" heritage and continues to bring the brand's unique spirit to life across a wide range of media platforms. Digital media continues to be a key strategic focus area to attract a new, younger demographic to the brand. These efforts have resulted in Tommy Hilfiger reaching millions of new customers and digital influencers, garnering significant press coverage of the digital programs, and, for the second year, placing in the top ten on L2's Digital IQ Index: Fashion, which ranks the digital competence of 85 global fashion brands across site, digital marketing, social media and mobile.



Tommy Hilfiger flagship store; Düsseldorf, Germany

Tommy Hilfiger also executed on its core strategies. In North America, the focus was on expanding the brand's presence in top Macy's doors, maximizing sales of key items and upgrading the in-store experience by creating clear and impactful store presentations. The international business also had many accomplishments, including the expansion of the European tailored business, which was brought in-house in 2012. Tommy Hilfiger also focused on high-growth markets, such as Brazil, where we entered into a joint venture with a local partner in January 2013, and India and China, where we continued to expand the brand's presence through existing joint ventures.

Tommy Hilfiger continues to hold strong global appeal, and we see substantial growth opportunities for the brand as we continue to elevate product lines, expand geographic penetration and grow our distribution network. Tommy Hilfiger will continue to focus on its womenswear and tailored apparel businesses in 2014, which represent two of the largest growth opportunities. From a geographic perspective, we will focus on growing Tommy Hilfiger's presence in Russia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, while also investing in and leveraging our joint ventures in high-growth markets. We are optimistic about Tommy Hilfiger's growth trajectory and believe that annual global retail sales growth of 8% to 10% is achievable.

Tommy Hilfiger
Global Retail Sales
2013: $6.4BN
By Region



North America

(U.S., Canada and Mexico)

Europe

(Europe, Middle East and Africa)

Latin America

(South and Central America and the Caribbean)

Asia/Rest of World

(Asia, Australia and New Zealand)

Tommy Hilfiger
Global Retail Sales
2009A - 2017E



2009 - 2013 Sales CAGR: 10%
2013 - 2017 Planned Growth: 8% - 10%




Tommy Hilfiger continues to hold strong global appeal, and we believe that annual global retail sales growth of 8% to 10% is achievable.








## HERITAGE BRANDS
IZOD • VAN HEUSEN • ARROW • SPEEDO • WARNER'S • OLGA

2013 was an important year for our Heritage Brands business. We strengthened our market position in dress shirts and neckwear, incorporated the acquired Speedo and Core Intimates (Warner's and Olga) businesses, expanded our distribution of IZOD and Van Heusen and sold our G.H. Bass & Co. business. Revenues grew nearly 20% over the prior year to $2.0 billion, driven primarily by the addition of the acquired businesses and outperformance in the wholesale sportswear businesses.

The dress furnishings business, which includes the world’s largest dress shirt and neckwear businesses and our men’s underwear business (which is operated separately from Calvin Klein Underwear), experienced revenue growth over 2012, with each business growing its market share. The neckwear business experienced particularly robust growth, reflecting its focus on enhancing products through improved quality and design. Additionally, Macy’s investments in its Herald Square flagship store are benefiting our business, including its expanded offerings of higher-end products from our Insignia Design Group.

## CLASSIC

2013 was an important year for Heritage Brands, as we strengthened our market position in dress shirts and neckwear, incorporated the Speedo, Warner's and Olga businesses, expanded distribution of IZOD and Van Heusen and sold the Bass business.



During 2013, each of our dress furnishings businesses strengthened its market position as compared to 2012, and our neckwear business experienced particularly robust growth.



Heritage Brands
Global Retail Sales \( ^{*} $ 
2010A - 2017E



2010 - 2013 Sales CAGR: 10%

2013 - 2017 Planned Growth: 3% - 4%

* 2013 and 2017 figures include revenues from Speedo, Warner’s and Olga. All periods exclude revenues from Bass and the exited Timberland men’s and Izod women’s wholesale sportswear businesses.

## 2013 Heritage Brands
Market Share

By Category as a Percentage of Total

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Neckwear</td><td>&gt;50</td></tr><tr><td>Dress Shirts</td><td>43 \( ^{1} \)</td></tr><tr><td>Woven Shirts</td><td>16 \( ^{1} \)</td></tr><tr><td>Knit Shirts</td><td>11 \( ^{1} \)</td></tr><tr><td>Casual Pants</td><td>5 \( ^{1} \)</td></tr><tr><td>Bras and Panties</td><td>9 \( ^{1} \)</td></tr><tr><td>Men&#x27;s Swimwear</td><td>7 \( ^{1} \)</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Based on percentage of 2013 unit volume in U.S. department and chain stores combined.

Wholesale sportswear revenues grew 10% (for our Van Heusen, Izod and Arrow businesses), reflecting the initiatives established in 2012 to better position the Van Heusen, IZOD and ARROW brands in U.S. department and chain store accounts. Across our Izod businesses, we took measures to align its marketing messaging to the brand's DNA, better communicate its brand positioning and create more consistency across our wholesale and retail businesses. The men's Izod wholesale business experienced 16% revenue growth and margin expansion, as IZOD collections performed well, particularly golf. IZOD gained share within U.S. department and chain stores through in-store branding initiatives, new shop-in-shops and significantly increased square footage. The Van Heusen and Arrow businesses also performed well, as we focused on reinforcing each brand's value equation and growing through cross-channel distribution. Van Heusen experienced notable growth at wholesale. The brand has received enhanced positioning within stores and is available in over 1,000 shop-in-shops, which feature increased fixtures and signage. On the traditional side, ARROW, with its "authentic American style" continues to be a key brand for Kohl's.





Webb Simpson, PGA Tour Champion

Our Speedo and Core Intimates businesses posted a strong first year under our ownership, producing consistent results and solid cash flows. The Speedo brand maintained its leadership position on the pool deck, growing in its distribution channels and increasing its lifestyle positioning across footwear, activewear and accessories. Within Core Intimates, Warner's and Olga saw expanded distribution in the mass market channel, with sales volume doubling compared to 2012; lost sales volume at J.C. Penney in 2012 was recaptured. Additionally, Warner's and Olga's combined market share for bras and panties increased to 9%. \( ^{+} \) 

Results for the Heritage Brands retail business were disappointing, as poor traffic and a highly promotional environment challenged moderate price point businesses. We are taking measures to improve performance, including selling the Bass business in November 2013 and right-sizing our store base to improve profitability. Additionally, we are leveraging design, marketing and other functions across the Izod and Van Heusen wholesale and retail businesses.

Looking ahead, we plan to grow sales and margins by maximizing the power of our brands and protecting and expanding our market share through enhanced product design and quality, focused product lines, strategic distribution adjustments and tailored marketing.



## COMMITTED

CSR is a key consideration in making business decisions, as our company greatly values integrity and accountability.



## Corporate Social Responsibility

At PVH, we are committed to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). We have been promoting human rights and worker well-being for over 20 years, and CSR is a key consideration in making business decisions. We strive to make a positive impact on the environment and the people in the communities where we live, work and operate. Our efforts have been recognized by Corporate Responsibility Magazine, which has ranked PVH as one of the top 100 "Best Corporate Citizens" for three years in a row. In 2013, we were ranked in the top 50 and received a number 14 ranking in the Human Rights category.

With a strong commitment to integrity and accountability, we aim to promote and maintain sustainable business practices that take into account the interests of all our stakeholders. We believe that our dedication to CSR across our businesses will become a key competitive advantage as we strive to deliver future growth and stockholder value. We report publicly on our CSR accomplishments, challenges and goals, as we believe that our transparency promotes awareness, dialogue and collaborative work toward better practices.

During 2013, PVH undertook many new CSR initiatives, as the acquisition of Warnaco increased our size, supplier base, product offerings and countries of operation, and created unique integration challenges. We did so while taking a broader approach to CSR to account for social, environmental and community impacts across the entire value chain of our businesses – from source to store. For more information on our CSR efforts, please visit www.pvhcsr.com.

## Taking a Lead Role in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh

In recent years, we have worked to pursue human rights issues beyond labor law compliance and rights of association to also seek safer facilities. In 2012, we were the first signatory of the Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, the groundbreaking effort to establish a broad factory inspection, safety and training program in Bangladesh's garment manufacturing industry. This was succeeded by the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, a binding agreement among brand owners, retailers, international labor unions and non-governmental organizations, to which we were one of the first to commit in May 2013. We serve on and have been an active member of the Steering Committee of the foundation putting the Accord's provisions into effect.

Many milestones in implementing the Accord’s requirements have been achieved, including appointing a senior leadership team and Chief Inspector; finalizing and publishing inspection standards; compiling and publishing a list of over 1,500 in-scope factories; and conducting pilot inspections in preparation for inspections of all covered factories in 2014. In addition, we seek to directly address these critical issues as part of our own inspection and audit processes.



Speedo charity swim event, March 2013



Dress shirt production, Shanghai, China



# During 2013, PVH undertook many new CSR initiatives, as the acquisition of Warnaco increased our size, supplier base, product offerings and countries of operation, and created unique integration challenges that we believe PVH can overcome.

## Expanding Our
Environmental Program

PVH remains committed to environmental sustainability. During 2013, we published a Chemicals Management Commitment and Action Plan to more effectively manage the use of chemicals in the manufacturing of our products (e.g., detergents, dyes, and other wet processes). Additionally, we joined the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC) Programme, a coalition of brands committed to leading the industry towards zero discharge of hazardous chemicals by 2020. We also published a global Restricted Substances List (RSL) across all businesses, which contains limits on the amount of named chemicals that can be found in our products.

As part of our commitment to the environment, workers, communities and consumers, PVH will continue to invest in chemicals management by implementing a global RSL testing protocol across all product categories and training our associates and suppliers on chemicals management and the phase-out of certain chemicals by 2020. We will also conduct a supplier pilot program to map the use of chemicals in manufacturing processes, identify opportunities for phase-out and work with the ZDHC to identify industry-wide solutions.

We have continued to monitor our carbon footprint among other environmental impacts. In 2013, our carbon footprint for PVH owned and operated facilities was 89,814 tons of  \( CO_{2} \) -e. \( ^{1} \) 

During 2014, we will work to develop a better understanding of our energy and water use, among other environmental issues.

 \( ^{1} \)  This datapoint reflects the carbon footprints of corporate offices, warehouses, retail stores in the United States, corporate offices and warehouses in The Netherlands and offices in Hong Kong.



Interfab Shirt Manufacturing Ltd.,
Dhaka, Bangladesh

## Advancing Our
Human Rights Program

Through our recent acquisitions of Tommy Hilfiger (2010) and Warnaco (2013), our supply chain has more than doubled in size and become increasingly complex. One key initiative in 2013 was the integration of Warnaco into the PVH human rights program. We made notable progress, including migrating Warnaco supplier information onto the PVH database and holding human rights orientation sessions with all Warnaco sourcing groups to facilitate adherence to “A Shared Commitment,” our global code of conduct and the associated

PVH Carbon Footprint Summary
Units in Tons

<table><tr><td>CO2 Emissions</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Offices \( ^{1} \)</td><td>5,269</td><td>9,868</td></tr><tr><td>Warehouses \( ^{2} \)</td><td>16,352</td><td>18,948</td></tr><tr><td>Retail \( ^{3} \)</td><td>64,086</td><td>60,998</td></tr><tr><td>Vehicle Emissions \( ^{3} \)</td><td>2,014</td><td>1,785</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>87,721</td><td>91,599</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  U.S., the Netherlands and Hong Kong  
 \( ^{2} \)  U.S. and the Netherlands  
 \( ^{3} \)  U.S. only

PVH CO₂ Emissions Profile
Units in Tons



* Emissions are direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the entity.
† Emissions are direct GHG emissions resulting from the generation of electricity.

processes and procedures. All former Warnaco suppliers must also pass a human rights assessment to be authorized for continued production.

We implemented several initiatives in 2013 to make our human rights program more consistent and impactful. This includes conducting a thorough assessment of the program across all businesses to identify areas for improvement, creating more robust tools and guidelines for our auditors and suppliers and conducting a supply chain risk-mapping exercise.



## A Focus on Philanthropy
Through PVH Cares

A commitment to supporting our communities through philanthropy and volunteerism is central to PVH’s values and culture. PVH Cares, our associate-led community engagement group, principally focuses on supporting the health and well-being of women and children. In 2013, PVH contributed approximately $5.7 million to support such causes. Another milestone during 2013 was the Calvin Klein sponsored gala for Save the Children, which raised over $1.8 million to benefit the organization, where Manny Chirico, our Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, was presented with the National Responsibility Award to recognize our ongoing support of the organization.

## Learning and Development

At PVH, we view our associates' hard work, dedication, talent and diversity as keys to our success. Our associates' quality of life, and their livelihood inside and outside the workplace, continues to be a top priority. Our commitment to our associates is validated by our long tenured workforce. To preserve our associate base, we are sharpening our focus on their personal and professional growth.

In 2013, ongoing support, education and formal training were made available to associates for the development of their professional and technical skills. We expanded our Talent Management team, upgraded our performance management processes and held our first annual summit for trainers from across the PVH global network. In addition, we introduced a more robust succession planning process and focused on leadership development initiatives that resulted in the design of two new accelerated leadership development programs to be rolled out in 2014. We also expanded both the leadership and core training curricula available to all associates. Additionally, we expanded participation in our mentoring programs to offer more support for professional development and stronger internal networks.

We will continue to expand upon these initiatives in 2014. Accordingly, we will conduct a new global associate



Calvin Klein SoulCycle charity spin class, September 2013

survey to receive associates' input and determine how to continually improve their experiences and opportunities at PVH. Global communication, an area identified in a prior survey, will continue to be a primary focus area; due to our organic growth and acquisitions over the last decade, our associate base and regions of operation have grown significantly, and we must evolve our communication capabilities to encourage connectivity across the more complex organization. We are investing in talent and technologies to enhance our communications, to ensure that our associates are well-informed and engaged in our businesses. We believe that the investments we make will drive associate engagement, and thereby improve productivity and results across our global organization.

## Community Investment
Dollar Amounts in Thousands

<table><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2012 \( ^{*} \)</td><td>2013 \( ^{\dagger} \)</td></tr><tr><td>Product Contributions</td><td>$ 13,428</td><td>$ 29,057</td><td>$ 9,801</td></tr><tr><td>Cash Contributions</td><td>6,055</td><td>8,073</td><td>5,684</td></tr><tr><td>Retail Customer Contributions</td><td>1,195</td><td>1,290</td><td>1,690</td></tr><tr><td>Associate Pledges</td><td>264</td><td>216</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>Fundraising</td><td>496</td><td>523</td><td>509</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 21,438</td><td>$ 39,159</td><td>$ 17,911</td></tr></table>

* During 2012, there was a significant increase in donations in the U.S. as a result of PVH Hurricane Sandy relief.
† Excludes any specific Warnaco product contributions.

## PVH U.S. Diversity Statistics

<table><tr><td>Comparison of 2008 - 2013</td><td>EEOC*</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Gender by Percentage</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total U.S. Workforce</td><td>Male</td><td>52</td><td>31</td><td>32</td><td>34</td><td>35</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Female</td><td>48</td><td>69</td><td>68</td><td>66</td><td>65</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>Ethnicity by Percentage</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total U.S. Workforce</td><td>White</td><td>65</td><td>65</td><td>66</td><td>62</td><td>59</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Minority</td><td>35</td><td>35</td><td>34</td><td>38</td><td>41</td><td>42</td></tr></table>

* U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 2012 Statistics.



# Directors, Officers and Other Information

## Directors

Emanuel Chirico \( ^{1} \) 
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company; Director,
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.
Director since 2005

Mary Baglivo \( ^{2} \) 
Chief Marketing Officer/VP Global
Marketing, Northwestern University;
Director, Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.
Director since 2007

Brent Callinicos \( ^{3} \) 
Chief Financial Officer,
Uber B.V., a transportation
network company.
Director since March 2014

Juan R. Figuereo \( ^{4} \) 
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, NII Holdings, Inc.,
a provider of differentiated mobile
communication services for
businesses and high-value
consumers in Latin America.
Director since 2011

Joseph B. Fuller \( ^{5} \) 
Senior Lecturer in Business
Administration, Harvard Business
School; Founder, Joseph Fuller, LLC,
a business consulting firm.
Director since 1991

Common Stock Transfer
Agent and Registrar
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
P.O. Box 64854
St. Paul, MN 55164-0854
Telephone: 1-800-468-9716
Website: www.shareowneronline.com

As of March 20, 2014, there were 700 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

## Stock Exchange

The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The New York Stock Exchange symbol is PVH. Options on the Company’s common stock are traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange.
Fred Gehring
Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Hilfiger and PVH International Operations.
Director since 2010

Margaret L. Jenkins \( ^{3,5,+} \) 
Founder and owner, Margaret Jenkins & Associates, a marketing and philanthropic services consulting firm. Former Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, Denny’s Corporation. Director since 2006

Bruce Maggin 1, 3, 4
Principal, The H.A.M. Media Group, LLC,
a media investment company; Director,
Central European Media Enterprises Ltd.
Director since 1987

V. James Marino \( ^{4} \) 
Retired Chief Executive Officer,
Alberto Culver Company, a personal
care products company; Director,
Office Depot, Inc.
Director since 2007

Helen McCluskey \( ^{3,+} \) 
Former President and Chief Executive Officer, The Warnaco Group, Inc., an apparel and swimwear product company; Director, Signet Jewelers Limited, a specialty jewelry retailer. Director since 2013

## Market Data

We obtained the market and competitive position data used throughout this Report from research, surveys or studies conducted by third parties and industry or general publications. Industry publications and surveys generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. While we believe that each of these studies and publications is reliable, we have not independently verified such data and we do not make any representation as to the accuracy of such information.

Corporate Web Site
www.pvh.com

Henry Nasella \( ^{1,2,5} \) 
Partner and Co-Founder, LNK Partners,
a private equity investment firm.
Director since 2003

Rita M. Rodriguez \( ^{3} \) 
Senior Fellow, Woodstock Theological
Center at Georgetown University;
Director, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.,
an asset management company.
Director since 2005

Edward Rosenfeld \( ^{4} \) 
Chairman (Director) and Chief Executive
Officer, Steven Madden, Ltd., a fashion
footwear and accessories company.
Director since March 2014

Craig Rydin \( ^{2} \) 
Operating Partner, LNK Partners, a private equity investment firm; Former Chairman of the Board of Directors, Yankee Holding Corp.; Former Non-Executive Chairman, The Yankee Candle Company, Inc.; Director, priceline.com Incorporated, an internet travel service.
Director since 2006

 \( ^{1} \)  Member, Executive Committee.
 \( ^{2} \)  Member, Compensation Committee.
 \( ^{3} \)  Member, Corporate Social Responsibility Committee.
 \( ^{4} \)  Member, Audit Committee.
 \( ^{5} \)  Member, Nominating & Governance Committee.
 \( ^{+} \)  Not standing for re-election at 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

## Associates

The Company has over 33,000 associates as of February 2, 2014.

## Trademarks

References in this Report to the brand names Calvin Klein Collection, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass and to other brand names in this Report are to trademarks owned (or formerly owned) by us or licensed to us by third parties and are identified by italicizing or boldfacing the brand.

## CSR

We publish an online report regarding our Corporate Social Responsibility program. The report is available at www.pvhcsr.com. Questions regarding our CSR program may be directed to Melanie Steiner; Senior Vice President, Chief Risk Officer at melaniesteiner@phv.com.



## Corporate Officers

Emanuel Chirico \( ^{*} \) 
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

Michael A. Shaffer \( ^{*} \) 
Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating &
Financial Officer

Mark D. Fischer
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary

David F. Kozel
Executive Vice President,
Human Resources

Bruce Goldstein
Senior Vice President
and Corporate Controller

Dana M. Perlman
Senior Vice President,
Treasurer, Business
Development and
Investor Relations

Melanie Steiner
Senior Vice President,
Chief Risk Officer

* Member, Operating Committee.
† Will become Executive Chairman of Tommy Hilfiger and Vice Chairman of PVH Corp. on or after July 1, 2014.
‡ Will add title of Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Hilfiger Group, on or after July 1, 2014.
* Will become Executive Chairman on July 1, 2014.
* Will become Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2014.

## Senior Executives

PVH Europe
Fred Gehring \( ^{†} \) 
Chief Executive Officer,
Tommy Hilfiger and
PVH International Operations

Daniel Grieder \( ^{†} \) 
Chief Executive Officer

Tommy Hilfiger
Tommy Hilfiger Europe
Peter Schlagboehmer
President/Brand Management

Tommy Hilfiger North America
Gary Sheinbaum \( ^{*} \) 
Chief Executive Officer

Jeannine D'Onofrio
Executive Vice President,
Production

Anne Marino
President, Wholesale
North America and Licensing

Samuel Sperrazza
Executive Vice President,
Retail Operations

Calvin Klein
Paul T. Murry III \( ^{*} \) , \( ^{*} \) 
Chief Executive Officer

Steven B. Shiffman \( ^{*} \) , \( ^{*} \) 
President, Chief
Commercial Officer

Cheryl Abel-Hodges
President, Global
Calvin Klein Underwear

Frank Cancelloni
President, Calvin Klein,
Asia Pacific

Alexander Cannon
President, Calvin Klein Men's
Sportswear and Jeanswear

Iris Epple
President/Brand Management,
Calvin Klein Europe

Nicholas Strange
President, Calvin Klein Retail

Pamela Bradford
Executive Vice President
and General Counsel

Heritage Brands
Francis K. Duane \( ^{*} \) 
Chief Executive Officer,
Heritage Brands and
North America Wholesale

Marc Schneider \( ^{*} \) 
Group President

Michael Kelly
Executive Vice President,
The PVH Marketing Group

Kenneth L. Wyse
President, Licensing
and Public Relations

Heritage Brands
Sportswear, Intimates
and Swimwear
Geoffrey Barrett
President, National Brand
Sportswear
James Gerson
President, Swimwear/Speedo

Leslie Hall
President, Core Intimates

Margaret P. Lachance
President, Van Heusen Retail

Mitchell Lechner
President, Dress Furnishings

David Sirkin
President, Neckwear

Molly Yearick
President, Izod Wholesale
and Retail

Corporate
Finance and Accounting
James W. Holmes
Vice President and Assistant
Corporate Controller

Global Supply Chain
William McRaith
Chief Supply Chain Officer

Information Technology and Logistics
Jon D. Peters
Executive Vice President,
Logistics and Technology

Kevin Urban
Executive Vice President,
Logistics Services

The 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PVH Corp. will be held at The Graduate Center - City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, Proshansky Auditorium, Concourse Level, New York, New York on Thursday, June 19, 2014 at 10:00 AM EDT. Materials sent to stockholders relating to the Annual Meeting are available at www.pvhanualmeetingmaterials.com.



The Company intends to post on its corporate website any amendments to, or waivers of, its Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers that would otherwise be reportable on a current report on Form 8-K. Such disclosure would be posted within four days following the date of the amendment or waiver.
The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments thereto are available free of charge on the Company’s corporate web site. Requests for copies of such reports can be made on the Company’s corporate web site or can be directed to the attention of the Treasurer at the Company’s principal office:

PVH Corp.
200 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016-3903
(212) 381-3500



## Financial Highlights

Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Data

<table><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Revenues</td><td>$ 5,891</td><td>$ 6,043</td><td>$ 8,216 \(</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT)</td><td>682 \(</td><td>752 \(</td><td>967 \(</td></tr><tr><td>Net Income Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>397 \(</td><td>486 \(</td><td>581 \(</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Net Income per Common Share Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>5.44 \(</td><td>6.58 \(</td><td>7.03 \(</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and Cash Equivalents</td><td>233</td><td>892</td><td>593</td></tr></table>

* See pages 30 - 31 for GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliations.

## GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

Net Debt/Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Dollars in Millions, Except Ratios

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>GAAP Net Income</td><td>$ 144</td></tr><tr><td>Pre-tax Non-recurring and One-time Items \( ^{\dagger} \)</td><td>454</td></tr><tr><td>GAAP Interest and Taxes</td><td>370</td></tr><tr><td>GAAP Depreciation and Amortization</td><td>314</td></tr><tr><td>Interest Included in Non-recurring and One-time Items \( ^{\dagger} \)</td><td>(1)</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and Amortization included in Non-recurring and One-time Items \( ^{\dagger} \)</td><td>(83)</td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP EBITDA as Presented</td><td>$ 1,197</td></tr><tr><td>Debt, Including Current Portion and Short-term Borrowings</td><td>$ 3,970</td></tr><tr><td>Capital Lease Obligations</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>Total Debt</td><td>$ 3,995</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and Cash Equivalents</td><td>593</td></tr><tr><td>Net Debt</td><td>$ 3,402</td></tr><tr><td>Total Net Debt/Non-GAAP EBITDA Ratio</td><td>2.8x</td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Non-recurring and one-time items represent (i) the costs incurred associated with our acquisition and integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring; (ii) the loss incurred in connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Bass business, including related costs; (iii) the income recorded due to the amendment of an unfavorable contract, which resulted in the reduction of a liability recorded at the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition; (iv) the costs incurred in connection with our debt modification and extinguishment; (v) the interest expense incurred prior to the Warnaco acquisition closing date related to the $700 of senior notes issued in 2012; and (vi) the recognized actuarial gain on retirement plans.








## GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">2013</td></tr><tr><td>GAAP</td><td>Adjustments¹</td><td>Non-GAAP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Revenues</td><td>$ 8,186</td><td>$ (30)</td><td>$ 8,216</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Earnings Consolidated</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBIT</td><td>$ 513</td><td>$ (453)</td><td>$ 967</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>% Growth</td><td>-22%</td><td></td><td>29%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ (437)</td><td>$ 581</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income per Common Share Calculation</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ (437)</td><td>$ 581</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Shares for Diluted Net Income per Common Share</td><td>83</td><td></td><td>83</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Net Income per Common Share Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 1.74</td><td></td><td>$ 7.03</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Business Data</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ (325)</td><td>$ 432</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger</td><td>$ 503</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 479</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>GAAP</td><td>Adjustments²</td><td>Non-GAAP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Earnings Consolidated</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBIT</td><td>$ 660</td><td>$ (91)</td><td>$ 752</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>434</td><td>(53)</td><td>486</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income per Common Share Calculation</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 434</td><td>$ (53)</td><td>$ 486</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Shares for Diluted Net Income per Common Share</td><td>74</td><td></td><td>74</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Net Income per Common Share Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 5.87</td><td></td><td>$ 6.58</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Business Data</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger</td><td>$ 421</td><td>$ (16)</td><td>$ 437</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4">2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>GAAP</td><td>Adjustments³</td><td>Non-GAAP</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Earnings Consolidated</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EBIT</td><td>$ 491</td><td>$ (191)</td><td>$ 682</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>276</td><td>(121)</td><td>397</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income per Common Share Calculation</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 276</td><td>$ (121)</td><td>$ 397</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Shares for Diluted Net Income per Common Share</td><td>73</td><td></td><td>73</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diluted Net Income per Common Share Attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 3.78</td><td></td><td>$ 5.44</td><td></td></tr></table>

 \( ^{1} \)  Adjustments for the year ended February 2, 2014 represent the elimination of (i) the costs incurred in connection with our acquisition and integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring; (ii) the loss incurred in connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Bass business, including related costs; (iii) the income due to the amendment of an unfavorable contract, which resulted in the reduction of a liability recorded at the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition; (iv) the costs incurred in connection with our debt modification and extinguishment; (v) the interest expense incurred prior to the Warnaco acquisition closing date related to the $700 of senior notes issued in 2012; (vi) the recognized actuarial gain on retirement plans; (vii) the tax effects associated with the foregoing items; (viii) non-recurring discrete tax items related to the Warnaco integration; and (ix) a non-recurring discrete tax item attributable to an increase to our previously-established liability for an uncertain tax position related to European and U.S. transfer pricing arrangements.
 \( ^{2} \)  Adjustments for the year ended February 3, 2013 represent the elimination of (i) the costs incurred in connection with our integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring; (ii) the costs incurred in connection with our acquisition of Warnaco; (iii) the interest expense incurred prior to the Warnaco acquisition closing date related to the $700 of senior notes issued in 2012; (iv) the recognized actuarial losses on retirement plans; (v) the tax effects associated with the foregoing costs; and (vi) the tax benefit resulting from the recognition of previously unrecognized net operating loss assets and tax credits.
 \( ^{3} \)  Adjustments for the year ended January 29, 2012 represent the elimination of (i) the costs incurred in connection with our integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring; (ii) the expense incurred associated with settling the unfavorable preexisting license agreement in connection with our buyout of the Tommy Hilfiger perpetual license in India; (iii) the costs incurred in connection with our modification of our credit facility; (iv) the costs incurred in connection with our negotiated early termination of our license to market sportswear under the Timberland brand and the 2012 exit from the Izod women's wholesale sportswear business; (v) the recognized actuarial losses on retirement plans; (vi) the tax effects associated with the foregoing costs; and (vii) the tax benefit resulting from revaluing certain deferred tax liabilities due to a decrease in the statutory tax rate in Japan.



## We grow powerful global lifestyle brands

PVH



# UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014
OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___ to ___

Commission File Number ___ 001-07572

PVH CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State of incorporation)

13-1166910

200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

(Address of principal executive offices)

10016

Zip Code

212-381-3500

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $1.00 par value

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. □

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐

(do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming, for purposes of this calculation only, that the registrant’s directors and corporate officers are affiliates of the registrant) based upon the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on August 4, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $10,842,672,194.

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 20, 2014: 82,204,255

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

<table><tr><td>Document</td><td>Location in Form 10-K in which incorporated</td></tr><tr><td>Registrant&#x27;s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014</td><td>Part III</td></tr></table>



SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995: Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K including, without limitation, statements relating to our future revenue and cash flows, plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy, and some of which might not be anticipated, including, without limitation, the following: (i) our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are subject to change at any time at our discretion; (ii) we may be considered to be highly leveraged, and will have to use a significant portion of our cash flows to service our indebtedness, as a result of which we might not have sufficient funds to operate our businesses in the manner we intend or have operated in the past; (iii) the levels of sales of our apparel, footwear and related products, both to our wholesale customers and in our retail stores, the levels of sales of our licensees at wholesale and retail, and the extent of discounts and promotional pricing in which we and our licensees and other business partners are required to engage, all of which can be affected by weather conditions, changes in the economy, fuel prices, reductions in travel, fashion trends, consolidations, repositionings and bankruptcies in the retail industries, repositionings of brands by our licensors and other factors; (iv) our plans and results of operations will be affected by our ability to manage our growth and inventory, including our ability to realize benefits from our acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (“Warnaco”); (v) our operations and results could be affected by quota restrictions and the imposition of safeguard controls (which, among other things, could limit our ability to produce products in cost-effective countries that have the labor and technical expertise needed), the availability and cost of raw materials, our ability to adjust timely to changes in trade regulations and the migration and development of manufacturers (which can affect where our products can best be produced), changes in available factory and shipping capacity, wage and shipping cost escalation, and civil conflict, war or terrorist acts, the threat of any of the foregoing, or political and labor instability in any of the countries where our or our licensees’ or other business partners’ products are sold, produced or are planned to be sold or produced; (vi) disease epidemics and health related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas, as well as reduced consumer traffic and purchasing, as consumers become ill or limit or cease shopping in order to avoid exposure; (vii) acquisitions and issues arising with acquisitions and proposed transactions, including, without limitation, the ability to integrate an acquired entity, such as Warnaco, into us with no substantial adverse effect on the acquired entity’s or our existing operations, employee relationships, vendor relationships, customer relationships or financial performance; (viii) the failure of our licensees to market successfully licensed products or to preserve the value of our brands, or their misuse of our brands; and (ix) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We do not undertake any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement, including, without limitation, any estimate regarding revenue or cash flows, whether as a result of the receipt of new information, future events or otherwise.



## PART I

## Item 1. Business

## Introduction

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our” or “us” refer to PVH Corp. and its subsidiaries.

Our fiscal years are based on the 52-53 week period ending on the Sunday closest to February 1 and are designated by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. References to a year are to our fiscal year, unless the context requires otherwise. Our 2013 year commenced on February 4, 2013 and ended on February 2, 2014; 2012 commenced on January 30, 2012 and ended on February 3, 2013; and 2011 commenced on January 31, 2011 and ended on January 29, 2012.

We obtained the market and competitive position data used throughout this report from research, surveys or studies conducted by third parties (including, with respect to the brand rankings for woven sport shirts, the NPD Group/POS Tracking Service), information provided by customers and industry or general publications. The United States department and chain store rankings to which we refer in this report are on a unit basis. Industry publications and surveys generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. While we believe that each of these studies and publications and all other information is reliable, we have not independently verified such data and we do not make any representation as to the accuracy of such information.

References to the brand names Calvin Klein Collection, ck Calvin Klein, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Hilfiger Denim, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner's, Olga, Eagle, Speedo, Geoffrey Beene, Kenneth Cole New York, Kenneth Cole Reaction, Sean John, MICHAEL Michael Kors, Michael Kors Collection, Chaps, Donald J. Trump Signature Collection, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Nautica, Ted Baker, J. Garcia, Claiborne, Robert Graham, U.S. POLO ASSN., Ike Behar, Access, Jones New York, and John Varvatos and to other brand names in this report are to registered trademarks owned by us or licensed to us by third parties and are identified by italicizing the brand name.

References to the sale of Bass refer to our November 4, 2013 sale of our G.H. Bass & Co. business and its Bass and G.H. Bass & Co. trademarks, which we refer to collectively as “Bass.”

References to the acquisition of Warnaco refer to our February 13, 2013 acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which companies we refer to collectively as “Warnaco.”

References to the acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger refer to our May 6, 2010 acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger B.V. and certain affiliated companies, which companies we refer to collectively as “Tommy Hilfiger.”

References to our acquisition of Calvin Klein refer to our February 2003 acquisition of Calvin Klein, Inc. and certain affiliated companies, which companies we refer to collectively as “Calvin Klein.”

## Company Overview

We are one of the largest branded apparel companies in the world, with a heritage dating back over 130 years. Our brand portfolio consists of nationally and internationally recognized brand names, including the global designer lifestyle brands Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, as well as Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner's, Olga and Eagle, which are owned brands, and Speedo, Geoffrey Beene, Kenneth Cole New York, Kenneth Cole Reaction, Sean John, MICHAEL Michael Kors, Michael Kors Collection, Chaps, Donald J. Trump Signature Collection, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Nautica, Ted Baker, J. Garcia, Claiborne, Robert Graham, U.S. POLO ASSN., Ike Behar, Access, Jones New York and John Varvatos, which are licensed, as well as various other licensed and private label brands. In addition, through the end of the third quarter of 2013, we owned, and operated businesses under, the G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass trademarks. We design and market branded dress shirts, neckwear, sportswear, jeanswear, intimate apparel, swim products and, to a lesser extent, handbags, footwear and other related products. Additionally, we license our owned brands over a broad range of products. We market our brands globally at multiple price points and across multiple channels of distribution, allowing us to provide products to a broad range of consumers, while minimizing competition among our brands and reducing our reliance on any one demographic group, merchandise preference, distribution channel or geographic region. During 2013, our directly operated businesses in North America consisted principally of wholesale dress furnishings sales under our owned and licensed brands; wholesale men's sportswear sales under our Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD and ARROW brands; wholesale men's and women's jeanswear and



underwear sales under our Calvin Klein brand; wholesale women’s intimate apparel sales under our Warner’s and Olga brands; wholesale swimwear, fitness apparel, swim accessories and related product sales under the Speedo brand; and the operation of retail stores, principally in outlet malls, under our Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen and IZOD brands and, through the end of the third quarter of 2013, the G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass brands. During 2013, our directly operated businesses outside of North America consisted principally of our Tommy Hilfiger International wholesale and retail businesses in Europe and Japan, our Calvin Klein wholesale and retail businesses in Europe, Asia and Latin America, and our wholesale Calvin Klein Collection business in Europe. Our licensing activities principally related to the licensing worldwide of our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger trademarks for a broad range of lifestyle products and for specific geographic regions.

On February 13, 2013, we acquired Warnaco, which follows our transformational acquisitions of Calvin Klein in 2003 and Tommy Hilfiger in 2010, and reinforces our strategy to drive the Calvin Klein brand’s reach globally. Prior to the acquisition, Warnaco was our largest licensee for Calvin Klein products and paid us an administrative fee on sales of Calvin Klein underwear, sleepwear and loungewear product categories for which it was the beneficial owner of the Calvin Klein trademark. Royalty and administrative fee payments to us by Warnaco accounted for approximately 37% of our Calvin Klein royalty, advertising and other revenue in 2012. The Warnaco acquisition provided us with complete direct global control of the Calvin Klein brand image and commercial decisions for the two largest Calvin Klein apparel categories — jeanswear and underwear. Under a single brand vision, we are able to better coordinate product design, merchandising, supply chain, retail distribution and marketing, which we believe strengthens the brand’s image, positioning and execution across all markets. In addition, we believe the acquisition takes advantage of our Warnaco’s complementary geographic platforms by enhancing our opportunities in the high-growth regions of Asia and Latin America, and allowing us to leverage our expertise and infrastructure in North America and Europe to enhance the growth and profitability of the Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses in these regions. The acquisition also added the Speedo, Warner’s and Olga brands into our Heritage Brands portfolio. With a diversified brand portfolio and strong operations in every major consumer market around the world, we believe our business is better balanced across geographies, channels of distribution, product categories and price points, and our opportunity to realize revenue growth and enhanced profitability has been expanded.

The acquisition of Warnaco has significantly impacted the way we manage and analyze our operating results. Beginning with the first quarter of 2013, we changed our segment reporting and the way we discuss our business segments to reflect this. Specifically, we aggregate our segments into three main businesses: (i) Calvin Klein, which consists of the Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments; (ii) Tommy Hilfiger, which consists of the Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments; and (iii) Heritage Brands, which consists of the Heritage Brands Wholesale and Heritage Brands Retail segments. Note 19, “Segment Data,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report contains information with respect to revenue, income before interest and taxes and assets related to each segment, as well as information regarding our revenue generated from foreign and domestic sources, and the geographic locations where our long-lived assets are held.

Our revenue reached a record $8.186 billion in 2013, approximately 45% of which was generated internationally. Our global designer lifestyle brands, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, together generated approximately 75% of our revenue during 2013.

On November 4, 2013, we sold substantially all of the assets of our Bass business. The decision to sell these assets was based on our strategy to drive growth through our higher-margin Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses.

## Company Information

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1976 as the successor to a business begun in 1881. Our principal executive offices are located at 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016; our telephone number is (212) 381-3500.

We make available at no cost, on our corporate website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also make available at no cost, on our corporate website, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our corporate website address is www.pvh.com.



## Calvin Klein Business Overview

We believe Calvin Klein is one of the best known designer names in the world. In 2013, it received the #8 ranking on MediaRadar’s “Most Talked About Fashion Brands of 2013” list, where it was featured alongside premiere global luxury brands, highlighting its strong global appeal and prominence among key tastemakers in the fashion industry. In order to more efficiently and effectively exploit the development opportunities for Calvin Klein, a tiered-brand strategy was established to provide a focused, consistent approach to global brand growth and development. Each of the Calvin Klein brands occupies a distinct marketing identity and position that preserves the brand’s prestige and image, while also allowing us to market products both domestically and internationally, at variety of price points, and to various consumer groups. The Calvin Klein brands are as follows:

- Calvin Klein Collection — our “halo” brand, under which men’s and women’s high-end designer apparel and accessories are sold both in the United States and overseas, with distribution in specialty and department stores, as well as our flagship store in New York City.

- Calvin Klein (platinum label) — our “bridge” brand, formerly known as ck Calvin Klein, under which men’s and women’s apparel and accessories are sold through specialty and department stores, as well as freestanding stores in Europe and Asia. We rebranded this tier in 2012 in order to present the Calvin Klein brands in a more consistent fashion.

- Calvin Klein (white label) — our “better” brand, under which men’s and women’s sportswear, outerwear, suits, footwear and accessories, as well as women’s dress and performance wear, and men’s dress furnishings are currently sold in North America through department stores and freestanding stores.

- Calvin Klein Jeans — the Calvin Klein Jeans brand includes men’s and women’s jeans and related apparel, which are sold worldwide, and denim accessories, which are sold in Europe and Asia. Distribution is through specialty and department stores, as well as freestanding stores.

- Calvin Klein Underwear — the world’s leading designer underwear brand for men and women, under which men’s and women’s underwear, sleepwear and loungewear are sold worldwide through specialty and department stores, as well as freestanding stores.

Since completion of the Warnaco acquisition, our directly operated businesses have accounted for a significantly larger portion of total worldwide Calvin Klein sales. Previously, the vast majority of Calvin Klein sales were under licenses and other arrangements. Calvin Klein controls the design and development of all products sold under the Calvin Klein brands, as well as oversees a worldwide marketing, advertising and promotions program for the brands. We believe that maintaining control over design and advertising through Calvin Klein’s dedicated in-house teams plays a key role in the continued strength of the brands. In 2013, over $300 million was spent globally in connection with the advertising, marketing and promotion of the Calvin Klein brands and these expenses were principally funded by Calvin Klein’s licensees and other authorized users of the brands.

Worldwide retail sales of products sold under the Calvin Klein brands were approximately $7.8 billion in 2013. Through our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments, we sell Calvin Klein products in a variety of distribution channels, as discussed below:

- Calvin Klein Wholesale — We operate wholesale businesses through which we distribute and sell Calvin Klein products to third party retailers and distributors. This includes our Calvin Klein dress furnishings and men’s sportswear businesses, which operate principally in the United States and Canada. Our wholesale businesses have expanded following our acquisition of Warnaco, and now also include the Calvin Klein men’s and women’s jeans and related apparel businesses, which operate worldwide; the Calvin Klein jeans accessories businesses, which operates principally in Europe and Asia; the Calvin Klein men’s and women’s underwear businesses, which operate worldwide; and our men’s and women’s swimwear business, which operates principally in Europe. Given the various price points at which products under the various Calvin Klein brands are sold, we have a range of wholesale customers. For example, within North America, our Calvin Klein white label men’s dress shirts, neckwear and sportswear are marketed at better price points and are distributed principally in better fashion department and specialty stores, including Macy’s. Our Calvin Klein Collection and Calvin Klein platinum label dress shirts are sold into the more limited channels of luxury or premier department and specialty stores, as well as through freestanding stores. The newly acquired jeanswear and underwear businesses distribute product primarily through department stores, chain stores, Company-operated retail stores, shop-in-shop/concession locations and stores operated under retail licenses or franchise and distributor agreements.



- Calvin Klein Retail — We operate retail businesses in North America, Europe, Asia and Latin America. Our Calvin Klein stores in the United States and Canada are located primarily in premium outlet centers and offer men’s and women’s apparel and other Calvin Klein white label products to communicate the Calvin Klein lifestyle. As a result of the Warnaco acquisition, we now also operate full-price and outlet stores and shop-in-shop/concession shops in Europe, Asia, Mexico and Brazil where we offer Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear products. Across our regional businesses, Calvin Klein products are also sold through our company-operated e-commerce sites.

- Calvin Klein Collection — We market the Calvin Klein Collection brand high-end men’s and women’s apparel and accessories collections through our Calvin Klein Collection flagship store located in New York City and our Calvin Klein Collection wholesale business.

- Licensing — We maintain licensing and similar arrangements worldwide for use of the Calvin Klein brands in connection with a broad array of products, including women’s dresses and suits, men’s tailored clothing, women’s sportswear and performance apparel, golf apparel, fragrances, eyewear, hosiery, socks, footwear, jewelry, watches, outerwear, handbags, small leather goods and home furnishings. In these arrangements, Calvin Klein combines its design, marketing and branding skills with the specific manufacturing, distribution and geographic capabilities of its licensing and other partners to develop, market and distribute these goods. Calvin Klein has approximately 45 licensing and other arrangements across the Calvin Klein brands. The arrangements generally are exclusive to a territory or product category. Additionally, we formed a joint venture, PVH Brands Australia Pty. Limited, in 2013, in which we own a 50% economic interest. The joint venture licenses the rights to distribute and sell Calvin Klein brand products in Australia, New Zealand and other island nations in the South Pacific. As a result of the Warnaco acquisition, we also own a 51% interest in a joint venture in India, which licenses the rights to the Calvin Klein trademarks in India.

Calvin Klein’s key licensing partners, and the products and territories licensed, include:

<table><tr><td>Licensing Partner</td><td>Product Category and Territory</td></tr><tr><td>CK Watch &amp; Jewelry Co., Ltd. (Swatch SA)</td><td>Men’s and women’s watches (worldwide) and men’s and women’s jewelry (worldwide, excluding Japan)</td></tr><tr><td>CK21 Holdings Pte, Ltd.</td><td>Men’s and women’s platinum label apparel, shoes and accessories (Asia, excluding Japan)</td></tr><tr><td>Coty, Inc.</td><td>Men’s and women’s fragrance, bath products and color cosmetics (worldwide)</td></tr><tr><td>DWI Holdings, Inc. / Himatsingka Seide, Ltd.</td><td>Soft home bed and bath furnishings (United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America and India)</td></tr><tr><td>G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.</td><td>Men’s and women’s coats and swimwear, women’s suits, dresses, sportswear, active performance wear and handbags, and luggage (United States, Canada and Mexico with some distribution for certain lines in Europe and elsewhere)</td></tr><tr><td>Jimlar Corporation / LF USA, Inc.</td><td>Men’s, women’s and children’s footwear (worldwide)</td></tr><tr><td>Marchon Eyewear, Inc.</td><td>Men’s and women’s optical frames and sunglasses (worldwide)</td></tr><tr><td>McGregor Industries, Inc. / American Essentials, Inc.</td><td>Men’s and women’s socks and women’s tights (United States, Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, Europe, Middle East and Asia, excluding Japan)</td></tr><tr><td>Onward Kashiyama Co. Ltd.</td><td>Men’s and women’s apparel and women’s handbags (Japan)</td></tr><tr><td>Peerless Delaware, Inc.</td><td>Men’s tailored clothing (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr></table>



The results of our Calvin Klein wholesale, retail and licensing activities in the United States, Canada and Mexico are reported in our Calvin Klein North America segment, and wholesale, retail and licensing activities outside of North America are reported in our Calvin Klein International segment.

## Tommy Hilfiger Business Overview

Tommy Hilfiger is one of few globally recognized designer lifestyle brands, with distribution in over 90 countries and more than 1,400 Tommy Hilfiger stores worldwide. The “classic American cool” spirit of the brand inspires a wide range of preppy, all-American designs that appeal to a diverse array of global consumers. Tommy Hilfiger occupies a unique position as a premium brand offering quality apparel, accessories and lifestyle products at accessible prices with a diverse consumer following. We believe the brand’s global awareness has been achieved through consistent implementation of a global marketing and communications strategy, product enhancements, increased marketing and an improved in-store experience. We continue to make significant investments in global advertising and integrated marketing programs, with the popular “The Hilfigers” advertising campaign as the current cornerstone of our global marketing strategy.

Tommy Hilfiger’s brand portfolio (which we refer to collectively as the Tommy Hilfiger brands) includes:

• Tommy Hilfiger — Tommy Hilfiger is targeted at the 25 to 45 year-old consumer. Product offerings by us and our licensees include sportswear for men, women and children; footwear; athletic apparel (golf, swim and sailing); bodywear (underwear, robes and sleepwear); eyewear; sunwear; watches; handbags; men’s tailored clothing; men’s dress furnishings; accessories; socks; small leather goods; fragrances; home and bedding products; bathroom accessories; and luggage.

• Hilfiger Denim — The Hilfiger Denim product line is targeted at the 25 to 30 year-old, denim-oriented consumer. Product offerings consist of casual apparel for men and women with a focus on premium jeans and related apparel; footwear; bags; accessories; eyewear; and fragrance. Inspired by American denim classics with a modern edge, Hilfiger Denim is more “fashion forward” and casual than the Tommy Hilfiger label.

Worldwide retail sales of Tommy Hilfiger products were approximately $6.4 billion in 2013. Through our Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments, we sell Tommy Hilfiger products in a variety of distribution channels, including:

Wholesale — The Tommy Hilfiger wholesale business consists of the distribution and sale of products in North America, Europe and Japan under the Tommy Hilfiger brands to third party retailers and distributors. The European retail customers range from large department stores to small independent stores. Tommy Hilfiger has, since the Fall of 2008, made the majority of its North American wholesale sales to Macy’s, Inc., which is currently the exclusive department store retailer for Tommy Hilfiger men’s and women’s sportswear in the United States. Tommy Hilfiger re-launched a wholesale business in Canada with Hudson’s Bay Company, Canada’s leading department store, in the Fall of 2011, which offers men’s and women’s sportswear.

• Retail — The Tommy Hilfiger retail business principally consists of the distribution and sale of Tommy Hilfiger products in Europe, the United States, Canada and Japan through company-operated full-price specialty and outlet stores, as well as through company-operated e-commerce sites. Tommy Hilfiger specialty stores consist of flagship stores, which are generally larger stores situated in high-profile locations in major cities and are intended to enhance local exposure of the brand, and anchor stores, which are located on high-traffic retail streets and in malls in secondary cities and are intended to provide incremental revenue and profitability. Company (outlet) stores in North America are primarily located in premium outlet centers and carry specially designed merchandise that is sold at a lower price point than merchandise sold in our specialty stores. Company (outlet) stores operated by Tommy Hilfiger in Europe and Japan are used primarily to clear excess inventory from previous seasons at discounted prices and, to a lesser extent, carry specially designed merchandise.

• Licensing — We license the Tommy Hilfiger brands to third parties both for specific product categories and in certain geographic regions, and generally on an exclusive basis. Tommy Hilfiger has over 25 license agreements. Tommy Hilfiger products are also sold through joint ventures in which we are a partner in China, India and Brazil, and by third party distributors, licensees and franchisees in Europe, Southeast Asia, Australia, Central and South America and the Caribbean. In 2010, we formed a joint venture in China in which we own a 45% economic interest. The joint venture assumed direct control of the licensed Tommy Hilfiger wholesale and retail distribution business in China from the prior licensee in August 2011. In addition, in September 2011, we acquired the



perpetually licensed rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India from GVM International Limited (“GVM”) and acquired from affiliates of GVM a 50% economic interest in a company that was renamed Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Private Limited (“TH India”). TH India was GVM’s sublicensee of the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks for apparel, footwear and handbags in India. As a result of the transaction, TH India is now the direct licensee of the trademarks for all categories (other than fragrance), operates a wholesale apparel, footwear and handbags business in connection with its license and sublicenses the trademarks for certain other product categories in the region. In November 2012, we formed, with an experienced local partner, a joint venture in Brazil in which we own a 40% economic interest. The joint venture holds an exclusive license for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in Brazil that became effective in January 2013.

Tommy Hilfiger’s key licensing partners, and the products and territories licensed, include:

<table><tr><td>Licensing Partner</td><td>Product Category and Territory</td></tr><tr><td>American Sportswear S.A.</td><td>Men&#x27;s, women&#x27;s and children&#x27;s sportswear, accessories and Hilfiger Denim distribution (Central America and South America (excluding Brazil))</td></tr><tr><td>Aramis, Inc.</td><td>Fragrance, cosmetics, skincare products and toiletries (worldwide)</td></tr><tr><td>BASECO SA DE CV</td><td>Men&#x27;s, women&#x27;s and children&#x27;s sportswear, accessories (excluding footwear), Hilfiger Denim distribution (Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>Dobotex International B.V.</td><td>Men&#x27;s, women&#x27;s and children&#x27;s socks (Europe)</td></tr><tr><td>Fishman and Tobin, Inc.</td><td>Boys&#x27; and girls&#x27; apparel (United States, Canada, Puerto Rico and Guam (Macy&#x27;s stores only))</td></tr><tr><td>LF USA Inc.</td><td>Bedding, bath, tabletop décor and decorative accessories (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>Marcraft Clothes, Inc.</td><td>Men&#x27;s tailored clothing (United States and Canada)</td></tr><tr><td>MBF Holdings LLC</td><td>Men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s footwear (United States and Canada)</td></tr><tr><td>Movado Group, Inc. &amp; Swissam Products, Ltd.</td><td>Men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s watches and jewelry (worldwide, excluding Japan (except certain customers))</td></tr><tr><td>Safilo Group S.P.A.</td><td>Men&#x27;s, women&#x27;s and children&#x27;s eyeglasses and non-ophthalmic sunglasses (worldwide, excluding India)</td></tr><tr><td>SK Networks Co., Ltd.</td><td>Men&#x27;s, women&#x27;s and children&#x27;s sportswear and Hilfiger Denim distribution (South Korea)</td></tr><tr><td>Swank, Inc.</td><td>Men&#x27;s belts and small leather goods (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger Asia-Pacific, Ltd.</td><td>Men&#x27;s, women&#x27;s and children&#x27;s sportswear and Hilfiger Denim distribution (Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan)</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger Australia PTY, Ltd.</td><td>Men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s sportswear and Hilfiger Denim distribution (Australia)</td></tr></table>

The results of our Tommy Hilfiger wholesale, retail and licensing activities in the United States and Canada are reported in our Tommy Hilfiger North America segment, and wholesales, retail and licensing activities outside of North America are reported in our Tommy Hilfiger International segment.

## Heritage Brands Business Overview

Our Heritage Brands business encompasses the design, sourcing and marketing of a varied selection of branded dress shirts, neckwear, sportswear, swim products, men’s underwear and women’s intimate apparel, as well as the licensing of our Van Heusen, IZOD and ARROW brands for an assortment of products. The Heritage Brands business also includes private label dress furnishings programs, particularly neckwear programs. We design, source and market these products to target distinct



consumer demographics and lifestyles in an effort to minimize competition among our brands. We distribute our Heritage Brands products at wholesale in department, chain, specialty, mass market, club, off-price and independent stores in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Our men's wholesale business represents our core business. As a complement to our wholesale business, we also market products directly to consumers through our Van Heusen and IZOD retail stores, principally located in outlet centers throughout the United States and Canada. In addition, through the end of the third quarter 2013, our Heritage Brands business included the ownership and operation of businesses under the G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass trademarks. The sale of substantially all of the assets of the Bass business closed on November 4, 2013, the first day of our fourth quarter.

Heritage Brands Wholesale. Our Heritage Brands Wholesale segment principally consists of:

- The design and marketing of men’s dress shirts and neckwear primarily to department, chain and specialty stores, and, to a lesser degree, mass market stores, club and off-price stores. We market both dress shirts and neckwear under brands including Van Heusen, ARROW, IZOD, Eagle, Sean John, Donald J. Trump Signature Collection, Kenneth Cole New York, Kenneth Cole Reaction, DKNY, Elie Tahari, J. Garcia, Ike Behar, MICHAEL Michael Kors, Michael Kors Collection and John Varvatos. We also market dress shirts under the Geoffrey Beene and Chaps brands and neckwear under the Nautica, Jones New York, Ted Baker, Access, U.S. POLO ASSN., Claiborne and Robert Graham brands, among others. We also offer private label dress shirt and neckwear programs to retailers, primarily national department and mass market stores. Collectively, our product offerings represent a sizeable portion of the domestic dress furnishings market. Van Heusen, ARROW and Geoffrey Beene were the first, second and third best selling national brand dress shirts, respectively, in United States department and chain stores in 2013.

We license certain of the brands under which we sell dress shirts and neckwear. The following table provides information with respect to the expiration of the licenses for the more significant brands (as determined based on 2013 sales volume):

<table><tr><td>Brand Name</td><td>Licensor</td><td>Expiration</td></tr><tr><td>Geoffrey Beene</td><td>Geoffrey Beene, LLC</td><td>December 31, 2021, with a right of renewal (subject to certain conditions) through December 31, 2028</td></tr><tr><td>Kenneth Cole New York and Kenneth Cole Reaction</td><td>Kenneth Cole Productions (Lic), Inc.</td><td>December 31, 2014, with a right to extend through December 31, 2019</td></tr><tr><td>Chaps</td><td>The Polo/Lauren Company, LP and PRL USA, Inc.</td><td>We expect to enter into an extension through March 31, 2017 (although there can be no assurance it will be completed)</td></tr><tr><td>MICHAEL Michael Kors</td><td>Michael Kors, LLC</td><td>January 31, 2015, with a right to extend (subject to mutual consent) through January 31, 2016</td></tr></table>

- The design and marketing of sportswear, including men’s knit and woven sport shirts, sweaters, bottoms, swimwear and outerwear, at wholesale, primarily under the IZOD, Van Heusen and ARROW brands primarily to department, chain, specialty, mass market, club and off-price stores. Van Heusen and ARROW were the first and fifth best selling national brand men’s woven sport shirts, respectively, and IZOD was the third best selling national brand men’s knit shirt in United States department and chain stores in 2013.

- The design and marketing of certain men’s, women’s and children’s swimwear, sportswear and related products under the Speedo trademark, the premier aquatic brand, exclusively in North America and the Caribbean under a perpetual license with Speedo International Limited, which license we acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition. Speedo products include swimwear and accessories for the performance, fitness, and active recreational consumers. These products include swim goggles, water-based fitness products, electronics and other swim and fitness-related products for adults and children, and are distributed through all major distribution channels, sporting goods stores, team dealers, swim clubs, off-price stores, catalog retailers and e-commerce, including Speedo’s own website.

- The design and marketing of women’s intimate apparel under the Warner’s and Olga brands. Warner’s and Olga women’s intimate apparel is primarily distributed in the United States, Canada and Mexico through all major distribution channels, including department, chain, mass market, club and off-price stores. Warner’s was the second



best selling average figure brand in United States department and chain stores in 2013 and has the largest market share for wire-free bras.

Heritage Brands Retail. Our Heritage Brands Retail segment consists of the operation of stores under the Van Heusen and IZOD names, primarily in outlet centers throughout the United States and Canada. We believe these stores are complement to our wholesale operations, as they further enhance consumer awareness of these brands by offering products that are not available in our wholesale lines, while also providing a means for managing excess inventory, as well as direct control of the in-store customer experience. Our Van Heusen stores offer men's dress shirts, neckwear and underwear, men's and women's suit separates, men's and women's sportswear, including woven and knit shirts, sweaters, bottoms and outerwear, and men's and women's accessories. Our IZOD stores offer men's and women's active-inspired sportswear, including woven and knit shirts, bottoms and activewear and men's and women's accessories. We continuously focus on rationalizing our Heritage Brands retail store base and improving productivity and profitability.

Through the end of the third quarter of 2013, we owned, and operated businesses under, the G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass trademarks, including approximately 160 Bass retail stores. Our Bass stores offered casual and dress shoes for men, women and children. Most of our Bass stores also carried apparel for men and women, including tops, neckwear, bottoms and outerwear, as well as accessories such as handbags, wallets, belts and travel gear.

Licensing. We license our heritage brands globally for a broad range of products through approximately 30 domestic and 45 international license agreements covering approximately 165 territories combined. We believe that licensing provides us with a relatively stable flow of revenues with high margins and extends and strengthens our brands.

We grant licensing partners the right to manufacture and sell at wholesale specified products under one or more of our brands. In addition, certain foreign licensees are granted the right to open retail stores under the licensed brand name. A substantial portion of the sales by our domestic licensing partners is made to our largest wholesale customers. We provide support to our licensing partners and seek to preserve the integrity of our brand names by taking an active role in the design, quality control, advertising, marketing and distribution of each licensed product, most of which are subject to our prior approval and continuing oversight.



Our heritage brand licensing partners, and the products and territories licensed by them, include:

<table><tr><td>Licensing Partner</td><td>Product Category and Territory</td></tr><tr><td>Arvind Ltd.</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s dresswear, sportswear and accessories (India, Middle East, Egypt, Ethiopia, Maldives, Nepal, Sri Lanka and South Africa); IZOD men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s sportswear and accessories (India and Middle East)</td></tr><tr><td>Beijing Innovative Garments</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s dress furnishings, tailored clothing and sportswear (China)</td></tr><tr><td>Clearvision Optical Company, Inc.</td><td>IZOD men&#x27;s and children&#x27;s optical eyewear and related accessories (United States and Latin America)</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate Apparel, Inc.</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s dresswear, sportswear and accessories, Van Heusen and IZOD men&#x27;s dresswear, sportswear and accessories (Philippines)</td></tr><tr><td>Cutie Pie Baby, Inc.</td><td>IZOD newborn, infants&#x27; and toddlers&#x27; sportswear and outerwear; IZOD children&#x27;s outerwear (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>ECCE</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s dresswear, sportswear and accessories (France, Switzerland and Andorra)</td></tr><tr><td>F&amp;T Apparel LLC</td><td>Van Heusen and ARROW boys&#x27; dress furnishings and sportswear; IZOD boys&#x27; sportswear; IZOD and ARROW boys&#x27; and girls&#x27; school uniforms; ARROW men&#x27;s tailored clothing; IZOD boys&#x27; tailored clothing (United States and Canada)</td></tr><tr><td>Fashion Company S.A.</td><td>Van Heusen men&#x27;s dress furnishings, tailored clothing, sportswear and accessories; IZOD men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s sportswear and accessories (Chile and Peru)</td></tr><tr><td>Five Star Blue, LLC</td><td>IZOD men&#x27;s denim pants and shorts (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>Gazal Apparel Pty Limited</td><td>Van Heusen men&#x27;s dress furnishings, tailored clothing and accessories (Australia and New Zealand)</td></tr><tr><td>Harbor Wholesale, Ltd.</td><td>IZOD footwear (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>Madura Garments</td><td>Van Heusen men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s dresswear, sportswear and accessories (India and Middle East)</td></tr><tr><td>Manufacturas Interamericana S.A.</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s dresswear, sportswear and accessories (Chile, Peru, Argentina and Uruguay)</td></tr><tr><td>Oracon Com. De Conf. LTDA</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s dresswear and sportswear (Brazil)</td></tr><tr><td>Peerless Delaware, Inc.</td><td>Van Heusen and IZOD men&#x27;s tailored clothing (United States, Canada and Mexico)</td></tr><tr><td>Seidensticker Private Label GmbH</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s dress shirts, sport shirts and neckwear (Europe excluding France)</td></tr><tr><td>Thanulux Public Company, Ltd.</td><td>ARROW men&#x27;s dress furnishings, tailored clothing, sportswear and accessories; ARROW women&#x27;s dresswear and sportswear (Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam)</td></tr><tr><td>Van Dale Industries, Inc.</td><td>IZOD women&#x27;s intimates and sleepwear; IZOD women&#x27;s accessories (United States and Canada)</td></tr><tr><td>Weihai Dishang Fashion Brands Co., Ltd</td><td>IZOD men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s sportswear and accessories (China)</td></tr></table>

## Our Business Strategy

We intend to grow our existing Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses, with particular emphasis on growth in Asia and Latin America, as well as to increase the revenue and profitability of our Heritage Brands business, through the execution strategies described below. In addition, we intend to capitalize on the significant opportunities presented by the Warnaco acquisition, particularly the opportunities to restore growth and improve profitability in the Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses.



## Calvin Klein Business

The tiered-brand strategy we created for the Calvin Klein brands establishes a strategic brand architecture to guide the global brand growth and development. Each of the Calvin Klein brands — Calvin Klein Collection, Calvin Klein platinum label, Calvin Klein white label, Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear — has a distinct marketing identity and position that preserves the brand’s prestige and image. Additionally, branding product across multiple tiers allows flexibility from market to market to build businesses that address the differences between markets.

Warnaco is the global licensee of Calvin Klein Jeans and beneficially owns the Calvin Klein trademark for underwear, sleepwear and loungewear. The Warnaco acquisition provided us with additional opportunities to grow our Calvin Klein business by rebuilding and growing the global Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses. We viewed 2013 as a year of investment and transition for these businesses. Investments made during 2013 included (i) appointing senior leadership, including new Presidents of Calvin Klein Asia-Pacific and Europe and adding appropriate talent to fill key design, marketing and merchandising positions; (ii) enhancing the existing infrastructure (systems and logistics); (iii) transitioning to elevated Calvin Klein Jeans product and clearing excess inventory; (iv) investing in in-store marketing and the in-store customer experience; and (v) reducing and restructuring the off-price and club sales distribution in Europe and North America. We expect these investments to continue in 2014. Our key strategies for the Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses include:

Improve execution within jeans and underwear and the “Calvin Klein” brands globally. Since we acquired Calvin Klein in 2003, global retail sales have grown at a compound annual rate of approximately 11%. Product innovation, category extensions and a targeted global brand marketing message are key drivers for the Calvin Klein brands. By reuniting the Calvin Klein brands under one owner, we have gained full control of the brand image and commercial decisions for the two largest apparel categories of Calvin Klein — jeanswear and underwear — for the first time. Our strategies to increase demand for Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear products include:

- Enhancing jeans design and improving coordination between design and in-country teams to address local market preferences;

• Aligning merchandise and presentation to be consistent with the global brand positioning of Calvin Klein;

• Optimizing product assortment across categories, channels and regions; and

- Creating a cohesive and consistent single brand message across categories, including sportswear, jeanswear, underwear and accessories.

Rebalance distribution and improve profitability in North America. In North America, we will continue to leverage our existing infrastructure and expertise to improve profitability of the acquired Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses by:

• Rebalancing the mix of distribution among the full-price, off-price and club channels;

• Leveraging our North American retail stores to better showcase jeans and underwear;

- Improving brand presentation at retail and investing in point-of-sale for Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear product; and

• Expanding category breadth, where appropriate.

Leverage our European operating platform and management team. We will continue to integrate the acquired European Calvin Klein businesses into our existing Tommy Hilfiger operating platform and leverage our systems and the expertise of our European management team to enhance execution and profitability of those businesses, in addition to managing the Calvin Klein platinum label business in Europe that we took control of in 2013, by employing the following strategies:

• Streamlining the cost structure within the existing jeans and underwear infrastructure in Europe;

• Optimizing distribution mix by reducing distribution in the off-price channel;

- Utilizing the Tommy Hilfiger matrix model to improve product placement and execution at wholesale and retail on a country/regional basis;

- Improving the sales productivity by promoting the Calvin Klein lifestyle across Europe through more effective merchandising and marketing;



- Accelerating growth in underpenetrated markets, such as Germany, the Netherlands, France, Scandinavia and Spain, with entry into select new markets, such as the Middle East; and

- Coordinating the European jeans and underwear go-forward strategy with the launch of the platinum label wholesale sportswear business.

Continue expansion in emerging markets. The Warnaaco acquisition increased our presence and local operations in high-growth, emerging markets in Asia and Latin America. We plan to continue growing in these markets by:

• Continuing to increase retail square footage in China and Brazil;

• Enhancing the existing infrastructure and adding appropriate talent to fill key open positions; and

- Evaluating opportunities to leverage existing capabilities to introduce and/or accelerate growth of additional categories and brands.

Realize identified cost synergy opportunities. The Warnaaco acquisition provided significant opportunities to reduce overhead and administrative expenses. We expect to achieve costs savings through synergies, principally with respect to certain corporate functions and duplicative brand management functions in North America and Europe.

## Tommy Hilfiger Business

Global retail sales for the Tommy Hilfiger business have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 11% since we acquired the business in 2010. Our strategies for continuing to grow revenues and improve profitability include the following:

Continue to expand the European business. We believe that there is significant potential for further expansion in Europe. Our current key strategies for the European market include:

- Developing the business in product categories that remain underdeveloped in Europe, such as pants, outerwear, underwear, accessories and womenswear;

• Continuing the expansion of the bags and small leather goods business;

• Expanding the Tommy Hilfiger tailored division, a business we acquired from our former licensee at the end of 2012;

• Focusing increased efforts on womenswear, where a significant opportunity for the Tommy Hilfiger brand remains;

- Concentrating on the development of the business in underpenetrated markets, such as France, the United Kingdom, Turkey, Eastern Europe (including Russia), and the Middle East, through our own retail expansion, as well as increased wholesale sales, supported by increases in advertising and marketing activities; and

- Increasing Tommy Hilfiger’s presence in Europe through the opening of additional specialty and outlet retail stores (both by us and retail partners), including brand-promoting locations, such as those opened on Schadowstraße, Düsseldorf, Kuznetsky Most, Moscow and Robertson Boulevard in Los Angeles in 2013, Regent Street, London in 2012 and Brompton Road, London in 2011, and anchor stores in key shopping destinations worldwide, such as those opened in Frankfurt, Hamburg and Vienna since our acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger.

Grow and continue to strengthen the North American business. Our overarching goals in North America are to drive brand elevation in every channel and category in which we operate, while maximizing our current store portfolio and pursuing opportunities for growth. We intend to achieve growth in the North American business by:

- Continuing to enhance our strategic alliance with Macy’s by leveraging our logistics capabilities and “preferred vendor” relationship with Macy’s, offering expanded merchandise assortments, adding and enhancing shop-in-shops in high-volume Macy’s stores, featuring Tommy Hilfiger products in Macy’s marketing campaigns and concentrating on brand enhancement and elevation through strategic marketing and investments in partnership with Macy’s;

• Expanding product offerings by Tommy Hilfiger and its licensees in both the retail and wholesale channels;

- Increasing Tommy Hilfiger’s overall presence and brand positioning through focused capital improvements in our existing retail stores to improve image, presentation and productivity and adding square footage in existing locations and opening new outlet stores, where appropriate;

- Elevating the product presentation and improving the visibility and exposure of the Tommy Hilfiger brand at Hudson’s Bay in Canada;



- Investing in advertising and marketing initiatives, such as our well-received “The Hilfigers” marketing campaign, through TV, print and digital media, with an emphasis on growing our customer database and expanding our Hispanic marketing campaign; and

- Enhancing our merchandising focus by delivering the right product regionally and offering an engaging store experience.

Expansion of opportunities outside of Europe and North America. Our opportunities in the rest of the world can be achieved by:

- Developing the Tommy Hilfiger business in Asia and Latin America by leveraging our operational experience within these regions obtained through the Warnaco acquisition;

- Continuing to develop our joint ventures in China (operations started in August 2011), India (acquired interest in September 2011) and Brazil (operations started in January 2013) by expanding our retail footprint, enhancing product and increasing price points;

- Improving our Tommy Hilfiger Japan business by repositioning the Tommy Hilfiger brand image to be more consistent with its positioning in other parts of the world. Measures include introducing regional sizing, enhancing product offerings and adopting other initiatives targeted at local market needs and elevating the brand’s visibility and positioning. Recent efforts include the opening of the first Asian flagship store on Omotesando in Tokyo in 2012; and

- Maintaining our balanced strategy of acquiring licenses, distributors and franchisees where we believe we can achieve greater scale and success compared to our partners, while at the same time licensing businesses for product categories and markets when we believe experienced and/or local partners provide the best opportunity for success.

Further improve the e-commerce channel. We intend to improve the online capabilities and functions of the Tommy Hilfiger European and North American e-commerce sites to improve the shopping experience and increase sales, while also expanding the number of countries to which we are able to ship.

## Heritage Brands Business

Our Heritage Brands business remains an integral part of our overall business mix. Our key strategies for the Heritage Brands business include the following:

Continue to strengthen the competitive position and image of our brand portfolio. We intend for each of our heritage brands to be a leader in its respective market segment, with strong consumer awareness and loyalty. We believe that our heritage brands are successful because we have positioned each one to target distinct consumer demographics and tastes. We will continue to design and market our branded products to complement each other, satisfy lifestyle needs, emphasize product features important to our target consumers and increase consumer loyalty. We will seek to increase our market share in our businesses by expanding our presence through product extensions and increased floor space. We are also committed to investing in our brands through advertising, sponsorships and other means to maintain strong customer recognition.

Pursue international growth. We intend to expand the international distribution of our heritage brands, including through licensing. We have approximately 45 license agreements, covering approximately 165 territories outside of the United States to use our heritage brands in numerous product categories, including apparel, accessories, footwear, soft home goods and fragrances. We believe that our strong brand portfolio and broad product offerings enable us to seek additional growth opportunities in geographic areas where we are underpenetrated, such as Europe and Asia.

In order to implement the strategies for the Heritage Brands business described above, we have a number of initiatives in place, including the following:

Develop and expand our newly acquired businesses. We aim to grow profitability within the Speedo, Warner’s and Olga businesses and look to achieve synergies, principally with respect to certain corporate functions and duplicative brand management functions in North America. Additionally, we intend to expand our market share positions in these newly acquired businesses, including through expanding our product lines and category offerings.

Maintain and protect our top-performing dress furnishings division. Our dress furnishings division continues to grow through cross-channel expansion and market share gains. We are focused on elevating the in-store experience in top doors and identifying brand and channel opportunities for additional growth.



Exit underperforming businesses. We continue to evaluate our businesses for productivity and profitability. We successfully exited our Bass retail business in the fourth quarter of 2013 and our Timberland and Izod women’s wholesale sportswear businesses in 2012.

Target marketing spend. We target our marketing expenditures on initiatives that we believe will reflect each brand’s core image, resonate with the target consumer and enhance the in-store shopping experience or encourage sales.

## Other Strategic Opportunities

We intend to continue to build our brand portfolio through acquisition and licensing opportunities. While we believe we have an attractive and diverse portfolio of brands with growth potential, we will continue to explore acquisitions of companies or trademarks and licensing opportunities that we believe are additive to our overall business. New license opportunities allow us to fill new product and brand portfolio needs. We take a disciplined approach to acquisitions, seeking brands with broad consumer recognition that we can grow profitably and expand by leveraging our infrastructure and core competencies and, where appropriate, by extending the brand through licensing.

## Seasonality

Our business generally follows a seasonal pattern. Our wholesale businesses tend to generate higher levels of sales in the first and third quarters, while our retail businesses tend to generate higher levels of sales in the fourth quarter. Royalty, advertising and other revenue tends to be earned somewhat evenly throughout the year, although the third quarter has the highest level of royalty revenue due to higher sales by licensees in advance of the holiday selling season. We expect this seasonal pattern will generally continue.

## Design

Our businesses depend on our ability to stimulate and respond to consumer tastes and demands, as well as on our ability to remain competitive in the areas of quality and price.

A significant factor in the continued strength of our brands is our in-house design teams. We form separate teams of designers and merchandisers for each of our brands, creating a structure that focuses on the special qualities and identity of each brand. These designers and merchandisers consider consumer taste and lifestyle and trends when creating a brand or product plan for a particular season. The process from initial design to finished product varies greatly but generally spans six to ten months prior to each retail selling season. Our product lines are developed primarily for two major selling seasons, Spring and Fall. However, certain of our product lines offer more frequent introductions of new merchandise.

Calvin Klein has a team of senior design directors who share a vision for the Calvin Klein brands and who each lead a separate design team. These teams control all design operations and product development for most licensees and other strategic partners.

Tommy Hilfiger seeks to reinforce the premium positioning of the Tommy Hilfiger brands by taking a coordinated and consistent worldwide approach to brand management. Products are then adapted and executed on a regional basis in order to adjust for local or regional sizing, fits, weather, trends and demand. Tommy Hilfiger management believes that regional execution and adaptation helps it anticipate, identify and respond more readily to changing consumer demand, fashion trends and local tastes or preferences. It also reduces the importance of any one collection and enables the brand to appeal to a wider range of customers.

## Product Sourcing

In 2013, our products were produced in over 1,300 factories and over 50 countries worldwide. With the exception of handmade and handfinished neckwear, which is made in our Los Angeles, California facility and accounted for less than 10% of our total quantity of neckwear sourced and produced, all of our products were produced by independent manufacturers located in foreign countries in Europe, the Far East, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, South America, the Caribbean, Central America and Africa. The manufacturers of our products are required to meet our quality, human rights, safety, environmental and cost requirements. No single supplier is critical to our production needs and we believe that an ample number of alternative suppliers exist should we need to secure additional or replacement production capacity and raw materials. We source finished products and raw materials. Raw materials include fabric, buttons, thread, labels and similar materials. Raw materials and production commitments are generally made two to six months prior to production, and quantities are finalized at



that time. We believe we are one of the largest users of shirting fabric in the world. Finished products consist of manufactured and fully assembled products ready for shipment to our customers and our stores.

Our Global Supply Chain teams, offices and buying agents enable us to monitor the quality of the goods manufactured by, and the delivery performance of, our suppliers, and work with our Global Compliance teams to ensure the enforcement of human rights and labor standards through our ongoing extensive training, approval and monitoring system. Our purchases from our suppliers are effected through individual purchase orders specifying the price, quantity, delivery date and destination of the items to be produced. Sales are monitored regularly at both the retail and wholesale levels and modifications in production can be made either to increase or reduce inventories. We look to establish long term supplier relationships in the appropriate locations throughout the world for our needs and place our orders in a manner designed to limit the risk a disruption of production at any one facility could cause a serious inventory problem while maximizing the business opportunity.

Tommy Hilfiger is a party to a nonexclusive agreement with Li & Fung Trading Limited under which Li & Fung performs most of Tommy Hilfiger’s sourcing work. Under the terms of the agreement, Tommy Hilfiger is required to use Li & Fung for at least 54% of its sourced products, or otherwise pay a penalty. Our Tommy Hilfiger business uses other third-party buying offices for a portion of its sourced products and has a small in-house sourcing team that places orders directly with suppliers.

We are continuing to develop strategies and make investments in skill sets and locations that enhance our ability to provide our customers with timely product availability and delivery. Our investments are focused at allowing us to reduce the cycle time between the design of products and the delivery of those products to our customers while increasing quality and consumer value. We believe the enhancement of our supply chain efficiencies and working capital management through the effective use of our distribution network and overall infrastructure will allow us to better control costs and provide improved service to our customers. The integration of Warnaco’s sourcing network has been a key element to our strategy to realize synergies and gain efficiencies.

We are committed to the health, safety and well-being of the workers throughout our supply chain and to the integrity of our products. We actively work to educate our associates and partners and improve factory conditions, as well as continue to invest in the communities where we do business.

## Warehousing and Distribution

To facilitate distribution, our products are shipped from manufacturers to our wholesale and retail warehousing and distribution centers for inspection, sorting, packing and shipment. Centers range in size and are principally located in the United States in Arkansas, California, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Tennessee; and internationally in The Netherlands, Canada, China, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, Brazil and Mexico. Our warehousing and distribution centers are designed to provide responsive service to our customers and our retail stores, as the case may be, on a cost-effective basis. This includes the use of various forms of electronic communications to meet customer needs, including advance shipping notices for certain customers.

We believe that our investments in logistics and supply chain management allow us to respond rapidly to changes in sales trends and consumer demands while enhancing inventory management. We believe our customers can better manage their inventories as a result of our continuous analysis of sales trends, broad array of product availability and quick response capabilities. Certain of our products can be ordered at any time through our EDI replenishment systems. For customers who reorder these products, we generally ship these products within one to two days of order receipt. At the end of 2013 and 2012, our backlog of customer orders totaled $1.473 billion and $930 million, respectively.

Our largest customers account for significant portions of our revenue. Sales to our five largest customers were 20.8% of our revenue in 2013, 18.7% of our revenue in 2012 and 19.5% of our revenue in 2011. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in 2013, 2012 or 2011.

## Advertising and Promotion

We market our brands and products to target distinct consumer demographics and lifestyles. Our marketing programs are an integral feature of our brands and their associated product offerings. Advertisements generally portray a lifestyle rather than a specific item. We intend for each of our brands to be a leader in its respective market segment, with strong consumer awareness and consumer loyalty. We believe that our brands are successful in their respective segments because we have strategically positioned each brand to target a distinct consumer demographic. We will continue to design and market our



products to complement each other, satisfy lifestyle needs, emphasize product features important to our target consumers and encourage consumer loyalty.

We advertise our brands through digital media, including our e-commerce platforms and social media outlets, in order to expand our reach to customers and enable us to provide timely information in an entertaining fashion to consumers about our products, special events, promotions and store locations. In addition, we also advertise through print media (including fashion, entertainment/human interest, business, men’s, women’s and sports magazines and newspapers), on television and through outdoor signage.

We also advertise our brands through sport sponsorships and product tie-ins. Our Van Heusen brand operates its professional football marketing and media campaign through individual endorsement agreements with Pro Football Hall of Famers Steve Young and Jerry Rice. In addition, PGA golfers Webb Simpson, Scott Piercy and Spencer Levin serve as ambassadors for the IZOD brand, and IZOD was the title sponsor of the IZOD IndyCar Series through the 2013 season. A number of world-class swimmers and divers, including Michael Phelps, Natalie Coughlin, Ryan Lochte and Katie Hoff, wore Speedo products in competition and participated in various promotional activities on behalf of the brand in 2013. Calvin Klein has a sponsorship agreement with the Brooklyn Nets and the Barclays Center and we have an all-brand, regional sponsorship agreement with the New York Giants. We also acted as an official sponsor of the 2014 Super Bowl Host Committee and had the right to use the 2014 Super Bowl Host Committee logo and marks for promotional use with the IZOD, Van Heusen, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands. In addition, we participate in cooperative advertising programs with our retail partners.

With respect to our North America retail operations, we generally rely upon local outlet mall developers to promote traffic for their centers. Outlet center developers employ multiple formats, including signage (highway billboards, off-highway directional signs, on-site signage and on-site information centers), print advertising (brochures, newspapers and travel magazines), direct marketing (to tour bus companies and travel agents), radio and television and special promotions.

We believe Calvin Klein is one of the best known designer names in the world. Its high-profile, often cutting-edge global advertising campaigns have periodically garnered significant publicity, notoriety and conversation among customers and consumers, as well as within the fashion industry, and have helped to establish and maintain the Calvin Klein name and image. Calvin Klein has a dedicated in-house advertising agency, with experienced creative and media teams that develop and execute a substantial portion of the institutional consumer advertising for products under the Calvin Klein brands and work closely with other Calvin Klein departments and business partners to deliver a consistent and unified brand message to the consumer.

Calvin Klein oversees a worldwide marketing, advertising and promotions program. Calvin Klein products are advertised primarily in national print media, through digital media and on television. Innovative marketing and advertising campaigns continue to fuel the global growth of Calvin Klein, highlighted by an expanded use of digital and social media marketing platforms, including a visually-driven, interactive Tumbler blog, which complements the brand’s editorial and celebrity wardrobing programs, to further consumer awareness and appeal. We believe promotional activities throughout the year further enhance awareness of the Calvin Klein brands. In addition to offering a broad array of Calvin Klein apparel and accessories products, Calvin Klein’s website, www.calvinklein.com, also serves as a marketing vehicle to complement the ongoing growth and development of the Calvin Klein brands.

Calvin Klein also has a dedicated in-house global communications team, which incorporates corporate communications, public relations, celebrity dressing and special events. This group coordinates many global events, including the Spring and Fall Calvin Klein Collection runway shows in New York City and Milan, and oversees the dressing of celebrities for events, award ceremonies and film premieres.

We believe that Tommy Hilfiger is also one of the world’s most well-known designer brands. Tommy Hilfiger employs advertising, marketing and communications staff, including an in-house creative team, as well as outside agencies, to implement its global marketing and communications strategy across all channels of distribution. The Tommy Hilfiger marketing and communications team develops and coordinates Tommy Hilfiger advertising for all regions and product lines, licensees and regional distributors. Advertisements for Tommy Hilfiger brand products appear primarily in fashion and lifestyle magazines, newspapers, outdoor media and cinema and on television. We also have increased the digital and online focus of marketing for the Tommy Hilfiger brands. The marketing and communications team also coordinates selected personal appearances by Mr. Tommy Hilfiger, including at runway shows, brand events and flagship store openings as part of its efforts. Most of Tommy Hilfiger’s licensees and distributors are required to contribute a percentage of their net sales of Tommy Hilfiger products, generally subject to minimum amounts, to the advertising and promotion of the Tommy Hilfiger brand and products. We maintain multiple showroom facilities and sales offices in Europe, North America and Asia for Tommy Hilfiger. We launch significant brand advertising campaigns two times per year in Spring/Summer and Fall/Winter to provide maximum consumer



visibility of the new seasonal collections and to support sell-through. In addition to offering a broad array of Tommy Hilfiger apparel and licensed products, Tommy Hilfiger’s website, www.tommy.com, also serves as a marketing vehicle to complement the ongoing development of the Tommy Hilfiger lifestyle brands.

## Trademarks

We own the Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner’s, Olga and Eagle brands, as well as related trademarks (e.g., IZOD XFG and the Tommy Hilfiger flag logo and crest design) and lesser-known names. These trademarks are registered for use in each of the primary countries where our products are sold and additional applications for registration of these and other trademarks are made in jurisdictions to accommodate new marks, uses in additional trademark classes or additional categories of goods or expansion into new countries.

We beneficially own the Calvin Klein marks and derivative marks in all trademark classes and for all product categories through our ownership of Calvin Klein and Warnaco. Calvin Klein and Warnaco together own the Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, which is the sole and exclusive title owner of substantially all registrations of the Calvin Klein trademarks. The sole purpose of the Trust is to hold these marks. Calvin Klein maintains and protects the marks on behalf of the Trust pursuant to a servicing agreement. The Trust licenses to Calvin Klein and Warnaco on an exclusive, irrevocable, perpetual and royalty-free basis the use of the marks.

Mr. Calvin Klein retains the right to use his name, on a non-competitive basis, with respect to his right of publicity, unless those rights are already being used in the Calvin Klein business. Mr. Klein has also been granted a royalty-free worldwide right to use the Calvin Klein mark with respect to certain personal businesses and activities, such as motion picture, television and video businesses, a book business, writing, speaking and/or teaching engagements, non-commercial photography, charitable activities and architectural and industrial design projects, subject to certain limitations designed to protect the image and prestige of the Calvin Klein brands and to avoid competitive conflicts.

Mr. Tommy Hilfiger is prohibited in perpetuity from using, or authorizing others to use, the Tommy Hilfiger marks (except for the use by Mr. Hilfiger of his name personally and in connection with certain specified activities). In addition, we are prohibited in perpetuity from selling products not ordinarily sold under the names of prestige designer businesses or prestige global lifestyle brands without Mr. Hilfiger’s consent, from engaging in new lines of business materially different from such types of lines of business without Mr. Hilfiger’s consent, or from disparaging or intentionally tarnishing the Tommy Hilfiger-related marks or Mr. Hilfiger’s personal name. The products that we are prohibited from selling include cigarettes, dog food and alcohol. Certain lines of business will not be considered “new lines of business” for purposes of the agreement, including apparel, fashion, eyewear, accessories, housewares, home and bedding products, personal care products, footwear, watches and leather goods.

Our trademarks are the subject of registrations and pending applications throughout the world for use on a variety of apparel, footwear and related products, and we continue to expand our worldwide usage and registration of new and related trademarks. In general, trademarks remain valid and enforceable as long as the marks continue to be used in connection with the products and services with which they are identified and, as to registered tradenames, the required registration renewals are filed. In markets outside of the United States, particularly those where products bearing any of our brands are not sold by us or any of our licensees or other authorized users, our rights to the use of trademarks may not be clearly established.

Our trademarks and other intellectual property rights are valuable assets and we vigorously seek to protect them on a worldwide basis against infringement. We are susceptible to others imitating our products and infringing on our intellectual property rights. This is especially the case with respect to the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands, as the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands enjoy significant worldwide consumer recognition and their generally higher pricing provides significant opportunity and incentive for counterfeiters and infringers. We have a broad, proactive enforcement program that we believe has been generally effective in controlling the sale of counterfeit products in the United States and in major markets abroad.

## Contingent Purchase Price Payments

In connection with our acquisition of Calvin Klein in 2003, we are obligated to pay Mr. Calvin Klein contingent purchase price payments based on a percentage of total worldwide net sales of products bearing any of the Calvin Klein brands with respect to sales made through February 12, 2018. Our obligation to make contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Klein is guaranteed by our domestic Calvin Klein subsidiaries and is secured by a pledge of all of the equity interests in our Calvin Klein subsidiaries and a first priority lien on substantially all of our domestic Calvin Klein subsidiaries' assets. Events of



default under the agreements governing the collateral for our contingent payment obligations to Mr. Klein include, but are not limited to (1) our failure to make payments to Mr. Klein when due, (2) covenant defaults, (3) cross-defaults to other indebtedness in excess of an agreed amount, (4) events of bankruptcy, (5) monetary judgment defaults and (6) a change of control, including the sale of any portion of the equity interests in our Calvin Klein subsidiaries. An event of default under those agreements would permit Mr. Klein to foreclose on his security interest in the collateral. In addition, if we fail to pay Mr. Klein a contingent purchase price payment when due and such failure to pay continues for 60 days or more after a final judgment by a court is rendered relating to our failure to pay, Mr. Klein will no longer be restricted from competing with us as he otherwise would be under the non-competition provisions contained in the purchase agreement related to our acquisition of Calvin Klein, although he would still not be able to use any of the Calvin Klein brands or any similar trademark in any competing business. Such contingent purchase price payments totaled $53 million, $51 million and $51 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

We reacquired in 2011 the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks that had been subject to a perpetual license previously granted to GVM. We are required to make annual contingent purchase price payments into 2016 (or, under certain circumstances, into 2017) based on a percentage of annual sales in excess of an agreed upon threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India. Such payments are subject to a $25 million aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one year anniversary of the acquisition. We made contingent purchase price payments of $429,000 and $185,000 during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

## Competition

The apparel industry is competitive as a result of its fashion orientation, mix of large and small producers, the flow of domestic and imported merchandise and the wide diversity of retailing methods. We compete with numerous domestic and foreign designers, brands, manufacturers and retailers of apparel, accessories and footwear.

We compete primarily on the basis of style, quality, price and service. Our business depends on our ability to stimulate consumer tastes and demands, as well as on our ability to remain competitive in these areas. We believe we are well-positioned to compete in the apparel industry. Our diversified portfolio of brands and products and our use of multiple channels of distribution have allowed us to develop a business that produces results which are not dependent on any one demographic group, merchandise preference, distribution channel or geographic region. We have developed a portfolio of brands that appeal to a broad spectrum of consumers. Our owned brands have long histories and enjoy high recognition within their respective consumer segments. We develop our owned and licensed brands to complement each other and to generate strong consumer loyalty. The Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands generally provide us with the opportunity to develop businesses that target different consumer groups at higher price points and in higher-end distribution channels than our heritage brands, as well as with significant global opportunities due to the worldwide recognition of the brands.

## Imports and Import Restrictions

A substantial portion of our products is imported into the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. These products are subject to various customs laws, which may impose tariffs, as well as quota restrictions. Under the provisions of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) agreement governing international trade in textiles, known as the “WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing,” the United States and other WTO member countries have eliminated quotas on textiles and apparel-related products from WTO member countries. As a result, quota restrictions generally do not affect our business in most countries. Presently, a portion of our imported products is eligible for certain duty-advantaged programs, including the North American Free Trade Agreement, Africa Growth & Opportunity Act, Central American Free Trade Agreement, Jordan Free Trade Agreement, Israel Free Trade Agreement, Egypt Qualifying Industrial Zones, Colombia Free Trade Agreement and the Peru Free Trade Agreement.

## Environmental Matters

Our facilities and operations are subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. In addition, we may incur liability under environmental statutes and regulations with respect to the contamination of sites that we own or operate or previously owned or operated (including contamination caused by prior owners and operators of such sites, abutters or other persons) and the off-site disposal of hazardous materials. We believe our operations are in compliance with terms of all applicable laws and regulations.



## Employees

As of February 2, 2014, we employed approximately 16,700 persons on a full-time basis and approximately 16,500 persons on a part-time basis. Approximately 4% of our employees were represented for the purpose of collective bargaining by five different unions. Additional persons, some represented by these five unions, are employed from time to time based upon our manufacturing schedules and retailing seasonal needs. Our collective bargaining agreements generally are for one to three-year terms. We believe that our relations with our employees are satisfactory.

## Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers:

<table><tr><td>Name</td><td>Age</td><td>Position</td></tr><tr><td>Emanuel Chirico</td><td>56</td><td>Chairman and Chief Executive Officer</td></tr><tr><td>Michael A. Shaffer</td><td>51</td><td>Executive Vice President and Chief Operating &amp; Financial Officer</td></tr><tr><td>Francis K. Duane</td><td>57</td><td>Chief Executive Officer, Heritage Brands and North America Wholesale</td></tr><tr><td>Fred Gehring</td><td>59</td><td>Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Hilfiger and PVH International Operations</td></tr><tr><td>Paul Thomas Murry</td><td>63</td><td>Chief Executive Officer, Calvin Klein</td></tr><tr><td>Mark D. Fischer</td><td>52</td><td>Executive Vice President, General Counsel &amp; Secretary</td></tr><tr><td>Dave Kozel</td><td>58</td><td>Executive Vice President, Human Resources</td></tr></table>

Mr. Chirico joined us as Vice President and Controller in 1993. Mr. Chirico was named Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 1999, President and Chief Operating Officer in 2005, Chief Executive Officer in February 2006, and Chairman of the Board in June 2007.

Mr. Shaffer has been employed by us since 1990. He served as Senior Vice President, Retail Operations immediately prior to being named Executive Vice President, Finance in 2005, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2006, and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer in February 2012.

Mr. Duane served as President of our Izod division from 1998 until 2001, was named Vice Chairman, Sportswear in 2001, Vice Chairman, Wholesale Apparel in March 2006, Chief Executive Officer, Wholesale Apparel in February 2012, and Chief Executive Officer, Heritage Brands and North America Wholesale in February 2013.

Mr. Gehring has been employed by Tommy Hilfiger since 1996. Mr. Gehring retained his position as Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Hilfiger upon our acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger in 2010 and was also named Chief Executive Officer, PVH International Operations upon such acquisition.

Mr. Murry has been employed by Calvin Klein since 1996. Mr. Murry retained his position as President and Chief Operating Officer, Calvin Klein upon our acquisition of Calvin Klein in 2003 and was named President and Chief Executive Officer, Calvin Klein in September 2008. Mr. Murry’s title was shortened to Chief Executive Officer, Calvin Klein, in connection with the reorganization we undertook at the time of the Warnaco acquisition; his responsibilities have not been reduced.

Mr. Fischer joined us as Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary in 1999. He became Senior Vice President in 2007 and Executive Vice President in 2013.

Mr. Kozel has been employed by us since 2003. He was promoted from Vice President to Senior Vice President in 2007 and to Executive Vice President in 2013.



## Item 1A. Risk Factors

## Acquisitions may not be successful in achieving intended benefits, cost savings and synergies.

One component of our growth strategy has been to make acquisitions, such as the Warnaco acquisition. Prior to completing any acquisition, our management team identifies expected synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities, but due to legal and business limitations, we may not have access to all necessary information. The integration process may be complex, costly and time-consuming. The potential difficulties of integrating the operations of an acquired business, such as Warnaco, and realizing our expectations for an acquisition, including the benefits that may be realized, include, among other things:

• failure to implement our business plan for the combined business;

• delays or difficulties in completing the integration of acquired companies or assets;

- higher than expected costs, lower than expected cost savings and/or a need to allocate resources to manage unexpected operating difficulties;

• unanticipated issues in integrating manufacturing, logistics, information, communications and other systems;

• unanticipated changes in applicable laws and regulations;

- unanticipated changes in the combined business due to potential divestitures or other requirements imposed by antitrust regulators;

• retaining key customers, suppliers and employees;

• retaining and obtaining required regulatory approvals, licenses and permits;

• operating risks inherent in the acquired business and our business;

• diversion of the attention and resources of management;

• consumers’ failure to accept product offerings by us or our licensees;

• assumption of liabilities not identified in due diligence;

- the impact on our or an acquired business’ internal controls and compliance with the requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; and

• other unanticipated issues, expenses and liabilities.

We cannot assure you that any acquisition will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

A substantial portion of our revenue and gross profit is derived from a small number of large customers and the loss of any of these customers could substantially reduce our revenue.

A few of our customers account for significant portions of our revenue. Sales to our five largest customers were 20.8% of our revenue in 2013, 18.7% of our revenue in 2012 and 19.5% of our revenue in 2011. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in 2013, 2012 or 2011.

Tommy Hilfiger is party to a strategic alliance with Macy’s providing for the exclusive wholesale distribution in the United States of most men’s, women’s and children’s sportswear under the Tommy Hilfiger brand. The term of the agreement with Macy’s ends on January 31, 2017 and is renewable at the option of Macy’s for one three-year renewal term. As a result of this strategic alliance, the success of Tommy Hilfiger’s North American wholesale business is substantially dependent on this relationship and on Macy’s ability to maintain and increase sales of Tommy Hilfiger products. In addition, our United States wholesale businesses may be affected by any operational or financial difficulties that Macy’s experiences, including any deterioration in Macy’s overall ability to attract customer traffic or in its overall liquidity position.

Other than Tommy Hilfiger’s strategic alliance with Macy’s, we do not have long-term agreements with any of our customers and purchases generally occur on an order-by-order basis. A decision by any of our major customers, whether motivated by marketing strategy, competitive conditions, financial difficulties or otherwise, to decrease significantly the amount of merchandise purchased from us or our licensing or other partners, or to change their manner of doing business with us or our licensing or other partners, could substantially reduce our revenue and materially adversely affect our profitability.



During the past several years, the retail industry has experienced a great deal of consolidation and other ownership changes, as well as management changes and store closing programs, and we expect such changes to be ongoing. In addition, store closings by our customers decrease the number of stores carrying our apparel products, while the remaining stores may purchase a smaller amount of our products and may reduce the retail floor space designated for our brands. In the future, retailers may further consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, realign their affiliations or reposition their stores' target markets or marketing strategies. Any of these types of actions could decrease the number of stores that carry our products or increase the ownership concentration within the retail industry. These changes could decrease our opportunities in the market, increase our reliance on a smaller number of large customers and decrease our negotiating strength with our customers. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Recent and future economic conditions, including volatility in the financial and credit markets, have affected, and in the future may adversely affect, our business.

Economic conditions have affected, and in the future may adversely affect, our business, our customers and our financing and other contractual arrangements. Recent economic developments have led to a reduction in consumer spending overall, which could have an adverse impact on our revenue and profitability. Such events have affected, and in the future could adversely affect, the businesses of our customers, which, among other things, have resulted and may result in financial difficulties leading to restructurings, bankruptcies, liquidations and other unfavorable events for our customers, and may continue to cause such customers to reduce or discontinue orders of our products. Financial difficulties of customers may also affect the ability of our customers to access credit markets or lead to higher credit risk relating to receivables from customers.

Recent or future volatility in the financial and credit markets could make it more difficult for us to obtain financing or refinance existing debt when the need arises or on terms that would be acceptable to us.

We may not be able to continue to develop and grow our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses in terms of revenue and profitability.

A significant portion of our business strategy involves growing our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses. Our achievement of revenue and profitability growth from Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger will depend largely upon our ability to:

• continue to realize the synergies, efficiencies and strategic rationale of the Warnaco acquisition;

• continue to maintain and enhance the distinctive brand identities of the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands;

• retain key employees at our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses;

• continue to maintain good working relationships with Calvin Klein’s and Tommy Hilfiger’s licensees;

• continue to enter into new (or renew or extend existing) licensing agreements for the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands; and

• continue to strengthen and expand the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses.

We cannot assure you that we can successfully execute any of these actions or our growth strategy for these brands, nor can we assure you that the launch of any additional product lines or businesses by us or our licensees or that the continued offering of these lines will achieve the degree of consistent success necessary to generate profits or positive cash flow. Our ability to successfully carry out our growth strategy may be affected by, among other things, our ability to enhance our relationships with existing customers to obtain additional selling space and/or add additional product lines, our ability to develop new relationships with retailers, economic and competitive conditions, changes in consumer spending patterns and changes in consumer tastes and style trends. If we fail to continue to develop and grow either the Calvin Klein or Tommy Hilfiger business in terms of revenue and profitability, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

The success of our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses depends on the value of our “Calvin Klein” and “Tommy Hilfiger” brands, and if the value of either of those brands were to diminish, our business could be adversely affected.

Our success depends on our brands and their value. The Calvin Klein name is integral to the existing Calvin Klein business, as well as to our strategies for continuing to grow and expand Calvin Klein. The Calvin Klein brands could be adversely affected if Mr. Klein’s public image or reputation were to be tarnished. We have similar exposure with respect to the



Tommy Hilfiger brands. Mr. Hilfiger is closely identified with the Tommy Hilfiger brand and any negative perception with respect to Mr. Hilfiger could adversely affect the Tommy Hilfiger brands. In addition, under Mr. Hilfiger’s employment agreement, if his employment is terminated for any reason, his agreement not to compete with the Tommy Hilfiger business will expire two years after such termination. Although Mr. Hilfiger could not use any Tommy Hilfiger trademark in connection with a competitive business, his association with a competitive business could adversely affect the Tommy Hilfiger business.

## Our level of debt could impair our financial condition and ability to operate.

As of February 2, 2014, we had outstanding an aggregate of $2.6 billion of term loan borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, $1.3 billion of senior unsecured notes and $100 million of secured debentures. In March 2014 we amended and restated our senior secured credit facility, borrowed an additional $600 million thereunder, and redeemed $600 million of our senior unsecured notes, resulting in an aggregate of $3.2 billion of term loan borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, $700 million of senior unsecured notes and $100 million of secured debentures outstanding as of March 24, 2014. Our level of debt could have important consequences to investors, including:

• requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations be used for the payment of interest on our debt, thereby reducing the funds available to us for our operations or other capital needs;

- limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate because our available cash flow after paying principal and interest on our debt may not be sufficient to make the capital and other expenditures necessary to address these changes;

- increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions because, during periods in which we experience lower earnings and cash flow, we will be required to devote a proportionally greater amount of our cash flow to paying principal and interest on our debt;

- limiting our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, contributions to our pension plans and general corporate requirements;

- placing us at a competitive disadvantage to other relatively less leveraged competitors that have more cash flow available to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, contributions to pension plans and general corporate requirements; and

- with respect to any borrowings we make at variable interest rates, including under our senior secured credit facility, leaving us vulnerable to increases in interest rates generally.

## Our business is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Our Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses each have a substantial international component, which exposes us to significant foreign exchange risk. Accordingly, the impact of a strengthening United States dollar, particularly against the Euro, the Brazilian Real, the Japanese Yen, the Korean Won, the British Pound, the Canadian dollar, the Mexican Peso, the Indian Rupee and the Chinese Yuan, will have a negative impact on our results of operations.

We have exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to certain anticipated cash flows associated with certain international inventory purchases and certain intercompany loans. We currently use and plan to continue to use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments to mitigate the cash flow or market value risks associated with these transactions, but we are unable to entirely eliminate these risks.

We are also exposed to market risk for changes in exchange rates for the United States dollar in connection with our licensing businesses, particularly our Calvin Klein business. Most of our license agreements require the licensee to report sales to us in the licensee's local currency but to pay us in United States dollars based on the exchange rate as of the last day of the contractual selling period. Thus, while we are not exposed to exchange rate gains and losses between the end of the selling period and the date we collect payment, we are exposed to exchange rate changes during and up to the last day of the selling period. In addition, certain of our other foreign license agreements expose us to exchange rate changes up to the date we collect payment or convert local currency payments into United States dollars. As a result, during times of a strengthening United States dollar, our foreign royalty revenue will be adversely impacted, and during times of a weakening United States dollar, our foreign royalty revenue will be favorably impacted.

We conduct business, directly or through licensees and other partners, in countries that are or have been subject to exchange rate control regulations and have, as a result, experienced difficulties in receiving payments owed to us when due, with amounts left unpaid for extended periods of time. Although the amounts to date have been immaterial to our results, as our



international businesses grow and if controls are enacted or enforced in additional countries, there can be no assurance that such controls would not have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We primarily use foreign suppliers for our products and raw materials, which poses risks to our business operations.

All of our apparel and footwear products, excluding handmade and handfinished neckwear, are produced by and purchased or procured from independent manufacturers located in countries in Europe, the Far East, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, South America, the Caribbean, Central America and Africa. We believe that we are one of the largest users of shirting fabric in the world. Although no single supplier or country is expected to be critical to our production needs, any of the following could materially and adversely affect our ability to produce or deliver our products and, as a result, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations:

• political or labor instability in countries where contractors and suppliers are located;

- political or military conflict involving any of the countries in which we operate, which could cause a delay in the transportation of our products and raw materials to us and an increase in transportation costs;

- heightened terrorism security concerns, which could subject imported or exported goods to additional, more frequent or more thorough inspections, leading to delays in deliveries or impoundment of goods for extended periods or could result in decreased scrutiny by customs officials for counterfeit goods, leading to lost sales, increased costs for our anti-counterfeiting measures and damage to the reputation of our brands;

- a significant decrease in availability or increase in cost of raw materials or the inability to use raw materials produced in a country that is a major provider due to political, human rights, labor, environmental, animal cruelty or other concerns;

• a significant decrease in factory and shipping capacity;

• a significant increase in wage and shipping costs;

- disease epidemics and health-related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas;

- migration and development of manufacturers, which could affect where our products are or are planned to be produced;

- imposition of regulations, quotas and safeguards relating to imports and our ability to adjust timely to changes in trade regulations, which, among other things, could limit our ability to produce products in cost-effective countries that have the labor and expertise needed;

• imposition of duties, taxes and other charges on imports;

• a significant fluctuation of the value of the United States dollar against foreign currencies; and

• restrictions on transfers of funds out of countries where our foreign licensees are located.

If our manufacturers, or the manufacturers used by our licensees, fail to use legal and ethical business practices, our business could suffer.

We require our manufacturers, and the manufacturers used by our licensees (and the licensees themselves), to operate in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations regarding working conditions, employment practices and environmental compliance. Additionally, we impose upon our business partners operating guidelines that require additional obligations in those areas in order to promote ethical business practices, and our staff and third parties we retain for such purposes periodically visit and monitor the operations of these independent parties to determine compliance. In 2013, we committed to join the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh to improve fire and building safety in Bangladesh's apparel factories and we continue to collaborate with factories, suppliers, industry participants and other engaged stakeholders to improve the lives of our factory workers and others in our sourcing communities. However, we do not control our manufacturers or licensees, or the manufacturers used by our licensees, or their labor, manufacturing and other business practices. If any of these manufacturers (or licensees) violates labor, environmental, building and fire safety, or other laws or implements labor, manufacturing or other business practices that are generally regarded as unethical in the United States, the shipment of finished products to us could be interrupted, orders could be cancelled and relationships could be terminated. In addition, we could be the focus of adverse publicity and our reputation could be damaged. This could be more adverse if multiple manufacturers engaged in these types of activities. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and, consequently, our results of operations.



We are dependent on third parties to source and/or manufacture our products and any disruption in the relationship with these parties or in their businesses may materially adversely affect our businesses.

We rely upon independent third parties for the vast majority of our apparel and footwear products. A manufacturer’s failure to ship products to us in a timely manner or to meet required quality standards could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers for those products. As a result, customers could cancel their orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reduced prices. Any of these actions taken by our customers could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and, consequently, our results of operations.

In addition, we are a party to a non-exclusive buying agency agreement with Li & Fung to carry out most of our sourcing for Tommy Hilfiger products. Li & Fung is one of the world’s largest buying agencies for apparel and related goods and is our largest buying office for Tommy Hilfiger products. Under the terms of the agreement, we are required to use Li & Fung for at least 54% of our global sourcing needs for Tommy Hilfiger products, or otherwise pay a penalty. The buying agency agreement with Li & Fung is terminable by us upon 12 months’ prior notice for any reason, and is terminable by either party (i) upon six months’ prior notice in the event of a material breach by the other party and (ii) immediately upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy or insolvency events relating to the other party. We also use other third-party buying offices for a portion of our sourcing for Tommy Hilfiger products and have retained a small in-house sourcing team. Any interruption in the operations of Li & Fung or other buying offices, or the failure of Li & Fung or other buying offices to perform effectively their services for us, could result in material delays, reductions of shipments and increased costs. Furthermore, such events could harm our wholesale and retail relationships. Although alternative sourcing companies exist, we may be unable to source Tommy Hilfiger products through other third parties, if at all, on terms commercially acceptable to us and on a timely basis. Any disruption in our relationship with our buying offices or businesses, particularly Li & Fung, could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on a limited number of distribution facilities. If one becomes inoperable, our business, financial condition and operating results could be negatively impacted.

We operate a limited number of distribution facilities. Our ability to meet the needs of our retail customers and of our own retail stores depends on the proper operation of our primary facilities. If any of our primary facilities were to shut down or otherwise become inoperable or inaccessible for any reason, we could have a substantial loss of inventory and/or disruptions of deliveries to our customers and our stores, and/or incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with the distribution of our products during the time it takes to reopen or replace the facility. This could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

## A portion of our revenue is dependent on royalties and licensing.

The operating profit associated with our royalty, advertising and other revenue is significant because the operating expenses directly associated with administering and monitoring an individual licensing or similar agreement are minimal. Therefore, the loss of a significant licensing partner, whether due to the termination or expiration of the relationship, the cessation of the licensing partner’s operations or otherwise (including as a result of financial difficulties of the partner), without an equivalent replacement, could materially impact our profitability.

While we generally have significant control over our licensing partners’ products and advertising, we rely on our licensing partners for, among other things, operational and financial controls over their businesses. Our licensing partners’ failure to successfully market licensed products or our inability to replace our existing licensing partners could materially and adversely affect our revenue both directly from reduced royalty and advertising and other revenue received and indirectly from reduced sales of our other products. Risks are also associated with our licensing partners’ ability to obtain capital; execute their business plans, including timely delivery of quality products; manage their labor relations; maintain relationships with their suppliers; manage their credit risk effectively; and maintain relationships with their customers.

## Our licensing business makes us susceptible to the actions of third parties over whom we have limited control.

We rely on our licensing partners to preserve the value of our brands. Although we make every attempt to protect our brands through, among other things, approval rights over design, production quality, packaging, merchandising, distribution, advertising and promotion of our products, we cannot assure you that we can control the use by our licensing partners of each of our licensed brands. The misuse of our brands by a licensing partner could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.



## Our retail stores are heavily dependent on the ability and desire of consumers to travel and shop.

A large number of our retail stores are located in or near major cities and vacation destinations. As a result, reduced travel resulting from economic conditions, fuel shortages, increased fuel prices, travel restrictions, travel concerns and other circumstances, including adverse weather conditions, disease epidemics and other health-related concerns, war, terrorist attacks or the perceived threat of war or terrorist attacks could have a material adverse effect on us, particularly if such events impact certain of our higher-volume retail locations. Other factors that could affect the success of our stores include:

• the location of the mall or the location of a particular store within the mall;

• the other tenants occupying space at the mall;

• increased competition in areas where the malls are located; and

• the amount of advertising and promotional dollars spent on attracting consumers to the malls.

## We may be unable to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights.

Our trademarks and other intellectual property rights are important to our success and our competitive position. We are susceptible to others imitating our products and infringing on our intellectual property rights. Since our acquisitions of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, we are more susceptible to infringement of our intellectual property rights, as the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands enjoy significant worldwide consumer recognition, and the generally higher pricing of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger branded products creates additional incentive for counterfeiters and infringers. Imitation or counterfeiting of our products or infringement of our intellectual property rights could diminish the value of our brands or otherwise adversely affect our revenue. We cannot assure you that the actions we take to establish and protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to invalidate our trademarks or block sales of our products as a violation of their own trademarks and intellectual property rights. In addition, we cannot assure you that others will not assert rights in, or ownership of, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of ours or in marks that are similar to ours or marks that we license and/or market or that we will be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. In some cases, there may be trademark owners who have prior rights to our marks because the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In other cases, there may be holders who have prior rights to similar marks. For example, in the past we were involved in proceedings relating to a company’s claim of prior rights to the IZOD mark in Mexico and to another company’s claim of prior rights to the Calvin Klein mark in Chile. We are currently involved in opposition and cancellation proceedings with respect to marks similar to some of our brands, both domestically and internationally.

## The success of our dress furnishings business is dependent on the strategies and reputation of our licensors.

Our business strategy is to offer our products on a multiple brand, multiple channel and multiple price point basis. This strategy is designed to provide stability should market trends shift. As part of this strategy we license the names and brands of recognized designers and celebrities, including Kenneth Cole, Sean “Diddy” Combs (Sean John), Donald J. Trump, Michael Kors, Donna Karan (DKNY), Ike Behar, Elie Tahari, John Varvatos and Robert Graham. In entering into these license agreements, we target our products towards certain market segments based on consumer demographics, design, suggested pricing and channel of distribution in order to minimize competition between our own products and maximize profitability. If any of our licensors determines to “reposition” a brand we license from them, introduce similar products under similar brand names or otherwise change the parameters of design, pricing, distribution, target market or competitive set, we could experience a significant downturn in that brand’s business, adversely affecting our sales and profitability. In addition, as products may be personally associated with these designers and celebrities, our sales of those products could be materially and adversely affected if any of those individual’s images, reputations or popularity were to be negatively impacted.

## We face intense competition in the apparel industry.

Competition is intense in the apparel industry. We compete with numerous domestic and foreign designers, brands, manufacturers and retailers of apparel, accessories and footwear, some of which have greater resources than we do. In addition, through their use of private label programs, we compete directly with our wholesale customers. We compete within the apparel industry primarily on the basis of:

• anticipating and responding to changing consumer tastes and demands in a timely manner and developing attractive, quality products;



• maintaining favorable brand recognition;

• appropriately pricing products and creating an acceptable value proposition for customers;

• providing strong and effective marketing support;

• ensuring product availability and optimizing supply chain efficiencies with third-party manufacturers and retailers; and

• obtaining sufficient retail floor space and effective presentation of our products at retail.

The failure to compete effectively or to keep pace with rapidly changing markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we misjudge the market for our products, we could be faced with significant excess inventories for some products and missed opportunities for others.

The loss of members of our executive management and other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We depend on the services and management experience of our executive officers who have substantial experience and expertise in our business. We also depend on other key employees involved in our licensing, design and advertising operations. Competition for qualified personnel in the apparel industry is intense and competitors may use aggressive tactics to recruit our key employees. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these individuals could materially adversely affect us.

A significant shift in the relative sources of our earnings, adverse decisions of tax authorities or changes in tax treaties, laws, rules or interpretations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow.

We have direct operations in many countries, and the applicable tax rates vary by jurisdiction. As a result, our overall effective tax rate could be materially affected by the relative level of earnings in the various taxing jurisdictions to which our earnings are subject. In addition, the tax laws and regulations in the countries where we operate may be subject to change and there may be changes in interpretation and enforcement of tax law. As a result, we may pay additional taxes if tax rates increase or if tax laws, regulations or treaties in the jurisdictions where we operate are modified by the competent authorities in an adverse manner.

In addition, various national and local taxing authorities periodically examine us and our subsidiaries. The resolution of an examination or audit may result in us paying more than the amount that we may have reserved for a particular tax matter, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, business, financial condition and results of operations for any affected reporting period.

We and our subsidiaries are engaged in a number of intercompany transactions. Although we believe that these transactions reflect arm’s length terms and that proper transfer pricing documentation is in place, which should be respected for tax purposes, the transfer prices and conditions may be scrutinized by local tax authorities, which could result in additional tax becoming due.

If we are unable to fully utilize our deferred tax assets, our profitability could be reduced.

Our deferred income tax assets are valuable to us. These assets include tax loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards in various jurisdictions. Realization of deferred tax assets is based on a number of factors, including whether there will be adequate levels of taxable income in future periods to offset the tax loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards in jurisdictions where such assets have arisen. Valuation allowances are recorded in order to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized in the future. In assessing the adequacy of our valuation allowances, we consider various factors including reversal of deferred tax liabilities, forecasted future taxable income and potential tax planning strategies. These factors could reduce the value of the deferred tax assets, which could have a material effect on our profitability.

Our profitability may decline as a result of increasing pressure on margins.

The apparel industry, particularly in the United States (our largest market), is subject to significant pricing pressure caused by many factors, including intense competition, consolidation in the retail industry, pressure from retailers to reduce the costs of products and changes in consumer demand. These factors may cause us to reduce our sales prices to retailers and consumers, which could cause our profitability to decline if we are unable to appropriately manage inventory levels and/or offset price reductions with sufficient reductions in product costs or operating expenses. This could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.



We rely significantly on information technology. Our businesses could be adversely impacted if our computer systems are disrupted or cease to operate effectively.

Our ability to effectively manage and operate our business depends significantly on information technology systems. This is particularly important as we continue the integration of Warnaco and the transition of its business and financial reporting systems onto our platforms. The failure of our systems to operate effectively, disruption in our systems or our inability to merge our systems with Warnaco’s could adversely impact our operations. Additionally, any electronic or physical security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information, including penetration of our network security, whether by us or by a third party, could disrupt our business, severely damage our reputation and our relationships with our customers, expose us to risks of litigation and liability and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Volatility in securities markets, interest rates and other economic factors could substantially increase our defined benefit pension costs and liabilities.

We have significant obligations under our defined benefit pension plans. These obligations increased significantly as a result of the Warnaco acquisition, both as a result of the addition of a large number of new participants and because Warnaco has a discontinued plan, the assets of which still must be maintained. The funded status of our pension plans is dependent on many factors, including returns on invested plan assets and the discount rate used to measure pension obligations. Unfavorable returns on plan assets, a lower discount rate or unfavorable changes in the applicable laws or regulations could materially change the timing and amount of pension funding requirements, which could reduce cash available for our business.

Our operating performance also may be significantly impacted by the amount of expense recorded for our pension plans. Pension expense recorded throughout the year is calculated using actuarial valuations that incorporate assumptions and estimates about financial market, economic and demographic conditions. Differences between estimated and actual results give rise to gains and losses that are recorded immediately in pension expense, generally in the fourth quarter of the year, which can create volatility in our operating results.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and our by-laws and Delaware General Corporation Law could make it more difficult to acquire us and may reduce the market price of our common stock.

Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain certain provisions, including provisions requiring supermajority voting (80% of the outstanding voting power) to approve certain business combinations with beneficial owners of 5% or more of our outstanding stock entitled to vote for election of directors, permitting the Board of Directors to fill vacancies on the Board and authorizing the Board of Directors to issue shares of preferred stock without approval of our stockholders. These provisions could also have the effect of deterring changes of control.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our common stock. The existence of this provision may have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by the Board of Directors.

## Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.



## Item 2. Properties

The general location, use, ownership status and approximate size of the principal properties which we occupied as of February 2, 2014 are set forth below:

<table><tr><td>Location</td><td>Use</td><td>Ownership Status</td><td>Approximate Area in Square Feet</td></tr><tr><td>New York, New York</td><td>Corporate and Heritage Brands administrative offices and showrooms</td><td>Leased</td><td>209,000</td></tr><tr><td>New York, New York</td><td>Calvin Klein administrative offices and showrooms</td><td>Leased</td><td>393,000</td></tr><tr><td>New York, New York</td><td>Tommy Hilfiger administrative offices and showrooms</td><td>Leased</td><td>298,000</td></tr><tr><td>Bridgewater, New Jersey</td><td>Corporate, finance and retail administrative offices</td><td>Leased</td><td>249,000</td></tr><tr><td>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</td><td>Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein administrative offices, warehouse and showrooms</td><td>Leased</td><td>250,000</td></tr><tr><td>Venlo/Tegelen, The Netherlands</td><td>Warehouse and distribution centers</td><td>Leased</td><td>942,000</td></tr><tr><td>McDonough, Georgia</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>851,000</td></tr><tr><td>Jonesville, North Carolina</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Owned</td><td>747,000</td></tr><tr><td>Irwindale, California</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>486,000</td></tr><tr><td>Chattanooga, Tennessee</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Owned</td><td>451,000</td></tr><tr><td>Reading, Pennsylvania</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Owned</td><td>410,000</td></tr><tr><td>Duncansville, Pennsylvania</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Owned</td><td>395,000</td></tr><tr><td>Montreal, Canada</td><td>Administrative office, warehouses and distribution centers</td><td>Leased</td><td>323,000</td></tr><tr><td>Los Angeles, California</td><td>Warehouse and newcar manufacturing facility</td><td>Leased</td><td>200,000</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Corporate, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger administrative offices, warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>174,000</td></tr><tr><td>Hong Kong, China</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Owned</td><td>112,000</td></tr><tr><td>Brinkley, Arkansas</td><td>Calvin Klein administrative offices, warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>97,000</td></tr><tr><td>Shanghai, China</td><td>Calvin Klein administrative office and warehouse</td><td>Leased</td><td>93,000</td></tr><tr><td>Mexico City, Mexico</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>73,000</td></tr><tr><td>Seoul, South Korea</td><td>Tommy Hilfiger showrooms</td><td>Leased</td><td>68,000</td></tr><tr><td>Dusseldorf, Germany</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>66,000</td></tr><tr><td>Ontario, Canada</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>59,000</td></tr><tr><td>Urayasu-shi, Japan</td><td>Warehouse and distribution center</td><td>Leased</td><td>53,000</td></tr><tr><td>Paris, France</td><td>Calvin Klein administrative offices</td><td>Leased</td><td>53,000</td></tr><tr><td>Trento, Italy</td><td>Calvin Klein administrative offices and warehouse</td><td>Leased</td><td>44,000</td></tr></table>

In addition, as of February 2, 2014, we lease certain other administrative/support offices and showrooms in various domestic and international locations. We also leased and operated approximately 1,900 retail locations as of February 2, 2014 in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, Mexico and Brazil.

Our Jonesville, North Carolina property is subject to a lien under our secured revolving credit facility.

Information with respect to minimum annual rental commitments under leases in which we are a lessee is included in Note 15, “Leases,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.



## Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are a party to certain litigations which, in management’s judgment based in part on the opinions of legal counsel, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

## Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.



## PART II

## Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Certain information with respect to the market for our common stock, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and the dividends declared on our common stock appear in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report under Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity,” and under the heading “Selected Quarterly Financial Data-Unaudited” on pages F-57 and F-58. See Note 7, “Debt,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a description of the restrictions to our paying dividends on our common stock. As of March 20, 2014, there were 700 stockholders of record of our common stock. The closing price of our common stock on March 20, 2014 was $119.12.

## ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

<table><tr><td>Period</td><td>(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased(1)</td><td>(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)(1)</td><td>(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs</td><td>(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs</td></tr><tr><td>November 4, 2013</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>December 1, 2013</td><td>5,672</td><td>$ 124.49</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>December 2, 2013</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>January 5, 2014</td><td>1,589</td><td>130.46</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>January 6, 2014</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>February 2, 2014</td><td>596</td><td>134.85</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>7,857</td><td>$ 126.48</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr></table>

(1) Our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan provides us with the right to deduct or withhold, or require employees to remit to us, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable tax withholding requirements applicable to stock-based compensation awards. To the extent permitted, employees may elect to satisfy all or part of such withholding requirements by tendering previously owned shares or by having us withhold shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum statutory tax withholding rate that could be imposed on the transaction. All shares shown in this table were withheld during the fourth quarter of 2013 in connection with the settlement of vested restricted stock units and restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding requirements.

The following performance graph and return to stockholders information shown below are provided pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. The graph and information are not deemed to be “filed” under the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to liabilities thereunder, nor are they to be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act unless we specifically incorporate them by reference.

The performance graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock against the cumulative return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods Index for the five fiscal years ended February 2, 2014.




Value of $100.00 invested after 5 years:

<table><tr><td>Our Common Stock</td><td>$ 643.80</td></tr><tr><td>S&amp;P 500 Index</td><td>$ 241.10</td></tr><tr><td>S&amp;P 500 Apparel, Accessories &amp; Luxury Goods Index</td><td>$ 399.50</td></tr></table>

## Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected Financial Data appears under the heading “Five Year Financial Summary” on pages F-62 and F-63.

## Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

## OVERVIEW

The following discussion and analysis is intended to help you understand us, our operations and our financial performance. It should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes, which are included elsewhere in this report.

We are one of the largest branded apparel companies in the world, with a heritage dating back over 130 years. Our brand portfolio consists of nationally and internationally recognized brand names, including Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Speedo (licensed for North America in perpetuity from Speedo International, Ltd.), Warner's and Olga. In addition, through the end of the third quarter of 2013, we owned, and operated businesses under, the G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass trademarks. We also license brands from third parties primarily for use on dress shirts and neckwear offered in the United States and Canada.



We acquired Warnaco on February 13, 2013, and, with it, acquired the global Calvin Klein jeanswear and underwear businesses and the Core Intimates (Warner’s and Olga) and Speedo businesses, which operate primarily in North America. Prior to the acquisition, Warnaco was our largest Calvin Klein license, as their royalty and administrative fee payments to us accounted for approximately 37% of our Calvin Klein royalty, advertising and other revenue in 2012. Our total consideration for the acquisition was $3.137 billion, consisting of $2.180 billion paid in cash, the issuance of approximately 8 million shares of our common stock (valued at $926 million), the issuance of stock awards valued at $40 million to replace outstanding stock awards made by Warnaco to its employees and the elimination of a $9 million pre-acquisition liability to Warnaco. We funded the cash portion and related costs of the acquisition, repaid all outstanding borrowings under our previously outstanding senior secured credit facilities and repaid all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt with the net proceeds of (i) an offering during the fourth quarter of 2012 of $700 million of 4 1/2% senior notes due 2022; and (ii) $3.075 billion of term loans borrowed during the first quarter of 2013 under new senior secured credit facilities. These items are more fully described in the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

Our revenue reached a record $8.186 billion in 2013, approximately 45% of which was generated internationally. Our global designer lifestyle brands, Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein, together generated approximately 75% of this revenue.

Our business strategy is to manage and market a portfolio of nationally and internationally recognized apparel and lifestyle brands at multiple price points and across multiple channels of distribution. We believe this approach reduces our reliance on any one demographic group, merchandise preference, distribution channel or geographic region. Our acquisition of Warnaco is consistent with this strategy, as it gave us direct global control of the brand image and commercial operations for Calvin Klein’s two largest apparel categories — jeanswear and underwear. With these categories under our ownership, our teams have taken steps to strengthen management, improve operations, unify our brand messaging, and coordinate and improve design, merchandising, retail distribution and marketing functions on a regional and global basis. We believe that these steps, which we will build upon in 2014, will strengthen Calvin Klein’s image, positioning and execution across all markets to drive sustainable growth. The Warnaco acquisition also provides a broader global platform for both the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses and has enabled us to continue to transform from a primarily North American multi-brand business with strong European Tommy Hilfiger operations, to a more diversified, global organization. We intend to take advantage of our and Warnaco’s complementary geographic operations; Warnaco’s operations in Asia and Brazil should enhance our opportunities in those high-growth regions, and we will have the opportunity to leverage our expertise and infrastructure in North America and Europe to enhance the growth and profitability of the Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses in those regions. The acquisition also added the Speedo, Warner’s and Olga brands to our Heritage Brands portfolio. Like our other Heritage Brands businesses, these businesses are replenishment-based and generally provide consistent profitability, healthy margins and strong cash flows. With a diversified brand portfolio and strong operations in every major consumer market around the world, we believe the acquisition made our business better balanced across geographies, channels of distribution, product categories and price points, and expanded our opportunity to realize revenue growth and enhanced profitability. We remain on track to achieve significant synergies created through the acquisition, principally with respect to certain corporate functions and duplicative brand management functions in North America and Europe. Additionally, in order to focus on our core competencies in apparel and continue to grow the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands globally, we sold substantially all of the assets of our Bass division on November 4, 2013. The sale enables us to further invest in our more profitable apparel businesses, while also reducing sales and earnings volatility.

## RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

## Operations Overview

We generate net sales from (i) the wholesale distribution to retailers, franchisees, licensees and distributors of men’s dress shirts, neckwear and underwear, men’s and women’s jeanswear, sportswear, intimate apparel, swim products, footwear, accessories and related products under owned and licensed trademarks; and (ii) the sale through approximately 1,900 company-operated free-standing retail store locations worldwide under our Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen and IZOD trademarks, and approximately 900 company-operated concessions/shop-in-shops worldwide under our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger trademarks, of apparel, footwear, accessories and other products. We also operated G.H. Bass & Co. stores through the end of the third quarter of 2013, at which time we sold substantially all of the assets of our Bass business.

We generate royalty, advertising and other revenue from fees for licensing the use of our trademarks. A substantial portion of our Calvin Klein licensing revenue was generated from Warnaco prior to the acquisition and, therefore, our royalty, advertising and other revenue decreased significantly in 2013 as compared to prior periods. In addition, the loss of such licensing revenue had a negative impact on our gross profit on total revenue, as licensing revenue carries no cost of goods sold.



We recorded pre-tax charges of $46 million during 2012 associated with the Warnaco acquisition. During 2013, we recorded pre-tax charges of $511 million in connection with the acquisition, integration, restructuring, and debt modification and extinguishment. This amount included non-cash charges of approximately $215 million, principally related to short-lived valuation adjustments and amortization and debt modification and extinguishment costs. We expect to incur additional costs and charges of approximately $100 million related to the integration and related restructuring in 2014. Our future results of operations will continue to be significantly impacted by this acquisition, particularly through the operations of the Calvin Klein business and through the changes in our capital structure that were necessary to effect the acquisition, as more fully discussed below.

The acquisition of Warnaco has significantly impacted the way we manage and analyze our operating results. As such, beginning with the first quarter of 2013, our reportable segments have been Calvin Klein North America, Calvin Klein International, Tommy Hilfiger North America, Tommy Hilfiger International, Heritage Brands Wholesale and Heritage Brands Retail. Please refer to Note 19, “Segment Data,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a further discussion.

On November 4, 2013, we sold substantially all of the assets of our Bass business and recorded a net pre-tax loss of $20 million during 2013 in connection with the sale. Please see the section entitled “Sale of Bass” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

We acquired Tommy Hilfiger in the second quarter of 2010. We recorded a gain of $24 million in 2013 due to the amendment of an unfavorable contract. At the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition in 2010, a liability was recorded for such unfavorable contract. The amendment executed in 2013 adjusted the contract terms thereby reducing the amount by which the contract was unfavorable and resulted in a reduction of the liability in the amount of $24 million. We incurred pre-tax charges of $21 million and $70 million during 2012 and 2011, respectively, in connection with the integration and the related restructuring, including product exit charges. We reacquired during the third quarter of 2011 the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks that had been subject to a perpetual license. We paid $25 million as consideration for this transaction and are required to make annual contingent purchase price payments under certain circumstances. In connection with that transaction, we were required to record an expense of $21 million in 2011 due to the settlement of an unfavorable contract as a result of a pre-existing relationship with the licensee, as the license provided favorable terms to the licensee. Please see the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

We announced in 2011 that we would be exiting in 2012 our licensed Timberland men’s wholesale sportswear and our Izod women’s wholesale sportswear businesses. We incurred pre-tax charges of $8 million during 2011 in connection with these two initiatives.

We amended and restated our senior secured credit facility in the first quarter of 2011. We recorded debt modification costs of $16 million in connection with this transaction. Please see the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion.

Our calculations of the comparable store sales percentages throughout this discussion are based on comparable weeks and, therefore, exclude an extra week in 2012, as our 2012 fiscal year included 53 weeks of operations.



The following table summarizes our income statements in 2013, 2012 and 2011:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>(dollars in millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 7,806</td><td>$ 5,541</td><td>$ 5,410</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>291</td><td>370</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>90</td><td>132</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>8,186</td><td>6,043</td><td>5,891</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>4,219</td><td>3,249</td><td>3,056</td></tr><tr><td>% of total revenue</td><td>51.5%</td><td>53.8%</td><td>51.9%</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>3,673</td><td>2,594</td><td>2,550</td></tr><tr><td>% of total revenue</td><td>44.9%</td><td>42.9%</td><td>43.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Debt modification and extinguishment costs</td><td>40</td><td>—</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, net</td><td>8</td><td>5</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes</td><td>513</td><td>660</td><td>491</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>192</td><td>119</td><td>129</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>8</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Income before taxes</td><td>329</td><td>543</td><td>363</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense</td><td>185</td><td>109</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>143</td><td>434</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>0</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 434</td><td>$ 276</td></tr></table>

## Total Revenue

## Net Sales

Our net sales were $7.806 billion in 2013, $5.541 billion in 2012 and $5.410 billion in 2011. The net sales increase of $2.265 billion in 2013 as compared to 2012 was due principally to the effect of the following items:

- An increase of $1.744 billion in net sales in our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments. The newly acquired Calvin Klein businesses contributed $1.635 billion of this increase. Also driving the increase was strong performance in the pre-acquisition North America businesses due to an 8% increase in the wholesale business combined with an increase in the retail business, driven by comparable store sales growth of 3% and square footage expansion. With respect to the newly acquired businesses, the North America underwater business performed well and exceeded plan, while the North America jeans business was weak as we focused on transitioning to elevated product for Fall 2014 and completed clearing excess inventory. Comparable store sales within the Calvin Klein International segment (which relate to newly acquired businesses) decreased 1%. The Calvin Klein businesses in Brazil and Asia performed well and exceeded expectations. Within Asia, the China business exhibited solid growth and the Korea business, although down compared to the prior year, showed improving trends during the year. The Calvin Klein business in Europe underperformed and was under pressure primarily due to our initiative to restructure the sales distribution mix in this region and the business’ concentration in Southern Europe, in particular Italy, where there is a weak macroeconomic environment. In addition, net sales in the Calvin Klein International segment in 2013 include a reduction of $30 million due to sales returns for certain Warnaco Asia wholesale customers in connection with an initiative to reduce excess inventory levels.

- An increase of $209 million in net sales attributable to growth in our Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments. Within the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment, net sales increased 8%, principally driven by 4% retail comparable store sales growth, retail square footage expansion and double-digit growth in the wholesale business. Net sales in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment increased 6%. Growth in Europe was driven by a 6% European retail comparable store sales increase, retail square footage expansion and a 9% increase in the European wholesale business and also included the positive impact of foreign currency translation due to a stronger Euro as compared with the prior year period. These increases were partially offset by a revenue decline in Japan, where we continue our efforts to reposition the brand. The revenue in Japan was also negatively impacted by foreign currency translation due to a weaker Yen as compared with the prior year.



- An increase of $313 million in net sales in our Heritage Brands Wholesale and Heritage Brands Retail segments. The newly acquired Speedo, Warner’s and Olga businesses contributed $450 million of net sales in our Heritage Brands Wholesale segment and revenue in our pre-acquisition ongoing Heritage Brands wholesale businesses increased 2%. These revenue increases were partially offset by (i) the loss of $75 million of revenue generated in the fourth quarter of 2012 related to the exited Bass business; (ii) the loss of sales related to the exited Izod women’s and Timberland wholesale sportswear businesses, which totaled $42 million in 2012; and (iii) a comparable store sales decline of 7% in the retail business due, in large part, to weak performance at Bass during the first three quarters of 2013.

The 2012 net sales increase of $131 million as compared to 2011 included a negative impact of approximately $210 million, or 4%, of which approximately $110 million was due to foreign currency translation and approximately $100 million was attributable to the exit from the Izod women's and Timberland wholesale sportswear businesses. The overall increase in 2012 as compared to 2011 was due principally to the effect of the following items:

- An increase of $154 million in net sales attributable to growth in our Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments. Within the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment, net sales increased 10%, principally driven by retail comparable store sales growth of 10%. Net sales in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment increased 2%, including a negative impact of approximately $110 million, or 6%, related to foreign currency translation. European retail comparable store sales grew 11% and the European wholesale business exhibited strong growth, but these increases were partially offset by weakness in Japan.

- An increase of $70 million in net sales attributable to our Calvin Klein North America segment, driven principally by (i) a 12% increase in the North America Calvin Klein retail business, which was due to new store openings, store expansions and a 5% increase in comparable store sales; and (ii) a 16% increase in the North America wholesale business.

- A $100 million reduction in net sales attributable to our Heritage Brands Wholesale and Heritage Brands Retail segments. Comparable store sales in the Heritage Brands Retail segment were relatively flat as compared to 2011, while sales in the Heritage Brands Wholesale segment decreased 10%, principally related to the exited sportswear businesses.

## Royalty, Advertising and Other Revenue

Royalty, advertising and other revenue in 2013 decreased to $380 million from $502 million in 2012, as strong performance in women’s apparel, handbags and accessories, as well as men’s and women’s outerwear, was more than offset by the absence in 2013 of Warnaco royalty and advertising revenue subsequent to the Warnaco acquisition, and the expiration of a long-term contractual agreement related to Calvin Klein royalties in the North America women’s sportswear business, which together totaled $146 million. Excluding this contractual agreement and the loss of Warnaco royalty and advertising revenue, Calvin Klein royalty, advertising and other revenue increased 8%. Tommy Hilfiger royalty, advertising and other revenue increased $7 million due to growth across most licensed product categories.

Royalty, advertising and other revenue was $502 million in 2012 as compared to $481 million in 2011. Of the $22 million increase, $12 million was attributable to our Tommy Hilfiger business, due principally to strong performance in footwear in North America, watches and eyewear globally, and other product categories in Asia and Latin America. Within the Calvin Klein business, global licensee royalty revenue increased 2%, including a negative impact of 1% related to foreign currency translation. Continued global growth in women's apparel, footwear and handbags was partially offset by a decline in royalty revenue related to a reduction in the European Calvin Klein bridge and accessories business attributable, in part, to our decision to terminate the previous licenses and operate the business directly, and weakness in jeans and women's underwear in Europe and the United States.

We currently expect that our 2014 revenue will increase to approximately $8.5 billion, a 3% increase, as compared to 2013, including the negative impact of $176 million, or 2%, attributable to the 2013 exit from the Bass business. Aggregate revenue for our Calvin Klein North America and Calvin Klein International segments in 2014 is projected to increase 5% from 2013, which included $30 million of sales returns recorded for certain Warnaco Asia wholesale customers in connection with an initiative to reduce excess inventory levels. Aggregate revenue for our Tommy Hilfiger North America and Tommy Hilfiger International segments in 2014 is expected to increase 7%. Aggregate revenue for our Heritage Brands Wholesale and Heritage Brands Retail segments is expected to decrease 5% as compared to 2013, including a negative impact of approximately 9% due to the absence of revenue from the Bass business we sold.



Gross profit on total revenue is calculated as total revenue less cost of goods sold. Included as cost of goods sold are costs associated with the production and procurement of product, including inbound freight costs, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs and other product procurement related charges. All of our royalty, advertising and other revenue is included in gross profit because there is no cost of goods sold associated with such revenue. As a result, our gross profit may not be comparable to that of other entities.

The following table shows our revenue mix between net sales and royalty, advertising and other revenue, as well as our gross profit as a percentage of total revenue for 2013, 2012 and 2011:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Components of revenue:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>95.4%</td><td>91.7%</td><td>91.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty, advertising and other revenue</td><td>4.6%</td><td>8.3%</td><td>8.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>100.0%</td><td>100.0%</td><td>100.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit as a % of total revenue</td><td>51.5%</td><td>53.8%</td><td>51.9%</td></tr></table>

Gross profit on total revenue in 2013 was $4.219 billion, or 51.5% of total revenue, compared to $3.249 billion, or 53.8% of total revenue, in 2012. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased 230 basis points in 2013 as compared with 2012, due primarily to (i) short-lived non-cash valuation adjustments recorded in connection with the Warnaco acquisition, which resulted in a decrease of approximately 60 basis points; (ii) returns recorded in connection with an initiative to reduce excess inventory levels, which resulted in a decrease of approximately 20 basis points; (iii) a significant decrease in our royalty, advertising and other revenue, which does not carry a cost of sales and has a gross profit percentage of 100%, for Calvin Klein as a result of the Warnaco acquisition, which is now replaced by the directly operated Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses, which do carry a cost of sales and have a large North American wholesale component (that generally operates at lower gross margins than our other businesses); (iv) the newly acquired Speedo, Warner’s and Olga businesses, which principally operate in North America and generate lower gross margins than our other businesses; and (v) a decrease in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment due to underperformance in Japan. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase related to the pre-acquisition Calvin Klein North America businesses resulting principally from higher average unit retail selling prices.

Gross profit on total revenue in 2012 was $3.249 billion, or 53.8% of total revenue, compared to $3.056 billion, or 51.9% of total revenue, in 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased 190 basis points in 2012 as compared with 2011, due primarily to our mix of business, as we experienced faster growth in our higher-margin Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses while exiting the lower-margin Izod women’s and Timberland wholesale sportswear businesses. In addition, our Tommy Hilfiger business experienced an increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue resulting from higher average unit retail selling prices globally.

We currently expect that the gross profit percentage on total revenue in 2014 will increase as compared with 2013, due principally to the absence in 2014 of short-lived non-cash valuation adjustments recorded in connection with the Warnaco acquisition and returns we recorded in connection with an initiative to reduce excess inventory levels. In addition, we expect growth in our higher-margin Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses to outpace growth in our lower-margin Heritage Brands businesses.

## Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

Our SG&A expenses were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>(dollars in millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SG&amp;A expenses</td><td>$ 3,673</td><td>$ 2,594</td><td>$ 2,550</td></tr><tr><td>% of total revenue</td><td>44.9%</td><td>42.9%</td><td>43.3%</td></tr></table>



SG&A expenses in 2013 were $3.673 billion, or 44.9% of total revenue, as compared to $2.594 billion, or 42.9% of total revenue in 2012. The 200 basis point increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was due principally to the net impact of (i) a net 400 basis point increase due to an increase over the prior year in acquisition, integration and restructuring costs incurred in connection with the Warnaco acquisition, of which 140 basis points were non-cash charges, principally related to short-lived valuation adjustments and amortization; and (ii) a 20 basis point increase due to the loss recorded in connection with the sale of the Bass business partially offset by (i) a 110 basis point decrease due to lower retirement plan expense resulting from actuarial gains in 2013, as compared to actuarial losses in 2012; (ii) a 30 basis point decrease in SG&A related to income recorded due to the amendment of an unfavorable contract, which resulted in the reduction of a liability recorded at the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition; (iii) a 30 basis point decrease in SG&A due to the absence in 2013 of integration and restructuring costs related to the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition; and (iv) a decrease due to the addition of Warnaco’s businesses, most of which are lower-expense wholesale businesses.

SG&A expenses in 2012 were $2.594 billion, or 42.9% of total revenue, as compared to $2.550 billion, or 43.3% of total revenue in 2011. The 40 basis point decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue was due primarily to the effect of (i) an 80 basis point decrease due to lower pension expense resulting from smaller actuarial losses; and (ii) a net 50 basis point decrease due to a reduction in acquisition, integration and restructuring costs incurred, primarily related to the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition; partially offset by (iii) a 90 basis point increase due principally to faster growth in the higher-expense Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses.

We currently expect that our SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue in 2014 will decrease from 2013, due principally to the lower costs expected to be incurred in 2014 in connection with the integration and related restructuring of Warnaco as compared to 2013. Our SG&A expenses may also be significantly impacted by the amount of expense recorded for our pension plans. Pension expense recorded throughout the year is calculated using actuarial valuations that incorporate assumptions and estimates about financial market, economic and demographic conditions. Differences between estimated and actual results give rise to gains and losses that are recorded immediately in earnings, generally in the fourth quarter of the year, which can create volatility in our operating results.

## Debt Modification and Extinguishment Costs

We incurred costs totaling $40 million in 2013 related to the modification and extinguishment of our previously outstanding term loans and the replacement of such term loans with new senior secured credit facilities entered into in 2013 in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. Please refer to the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a discussion of this transaction.

We incurred costs totaling $16 million during 2011 in connection with the amendment and restatement of our senior secured credit facility entered into in 2010. Please refer to the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a discussion of this transaction.

We incurred approximately $90 million of costs in March 2014 related to the refinancing of our term loans and the redemption of our 7 3/8% senior notes due 2020, of which approximately $10 million was non-cash. Please refer to the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a discussion of these transactions.

## Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates, Net

The equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, net during 2013 was $8 million as compared to $5 million during 2012 and $1 million during 2011. These amounts relate to our share of income from our joint ventures for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in China and India, both of which began operations under our partnership in the third quarter of 2011, and in Brazil, which began operations in the fourth quarter of 2012. Our investments in these joint ventures are being accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Please refer to the section entitled “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates (Australia, Brazil, China and India Joint Ventures)” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion of our investments in these joint ventures.

## Interest Expense and Interest Income

Interest expense increased to $192 million in 2013 from $119 million in 2012 due principally to increased debt balances in 2013 incurred to finance the Warnaco acquisition. Please refer to the section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion. Interest income increased to $8 million in 2013 from $1 million in 2012, due principally to an increase in our average cash position during 2013.



Interest expense decreased to $119 million in 2012 from $129 million in 2011, principally as a result of payments we made on our term loans during 2012 and 2011, partially offset by interest expense incurred on our $700 million of 4 1/2% senior notes due 2022, which were issued during the fourth quarter of 2012 to fund a portion of the consideration for the Warnaco acquisition. Please refer to the section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for a further discussion. Interest income of $1 million in 2012 was relatively flat to 2011.

Net interest expense for 2014 is currently expected to decrease to approximately $145 million from $185 million in 2013, principally as a result of anticipated debt payments of approximately $400 million in 2014, combined with the effect of debt payments made during 2013 and the March 2014 refinancing of our term loans and redemption of our 7 3/8% senior notes due 2020, as more fully discussed in the section entitled “Financing Arrangements” within “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

## Income Taxes

Income tax expense was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>(dollars in millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense</td><td>$     185</td><td>$     109</td><td>$     87</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense as a % of pre-tax income</td><td>56.4%</td><td>20.1%</td><td>24.1%</td></tr></table>

Since the acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger in 2010, our effective tax rate has generally been lower than the United States statutory rate, due principally to the benefit of overall lower tax rates in international jurisdictions where we file tax returns. While this was not the case in 2013 as explained below, we generally expect this to continue.

The effective tax rate for 2013 was 56.4% compared with 20.1% in 2012. The effective tax rate for 2013 increased as compared to 2012 due principally to a significant increase to our estimate for uncertain tax positions principally due to an increase to our previously established liability for an uncertain tax position related to European and United States transfer pricing arrangements. Also contributing to the increased rate in 2013 was an expense related to valuation allowances recorded on deferred tax assets from our business in Japan, as well as certain domestic state and local deferred tax assets. Partially offsetting these increases was the impact of Warnaco integration and restructuring expenses in 2013, the majority of which are being incurred in the United States, which lowers our domestic taxable income in relation to taxable income in lower tax international jurisdictions.

The effective tax rate for 2012 was 20.1% compared with 24.1% in 2011. The 2012 effective tax rate was lower than 2011 due to certain foreign earnings in 2011 being taxed in the United States, as well as additional tax synergies resulting from the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition, partially offset by non-deductible acquisition expenses incurred in 2012 in connection with the Warnaco acquisition.

We currently anticipate that our 2014 effective tax rate will be substantially less than the 2013 effective tax rate, as we currently do not expect the impact we experienced from increasing our estimate for uncertain tax positions to recur. Such reduction is expected to be partially offset by reduced Warnaco integration and restructuring expenses, which would increase the proportion of our pre-tax earnings subject to United States tax. Our tax rate is affected by many factors, including the mix of international and domestic pre-tax earnings, discrete events arising from specific transactions, and audits by tax authorities or the receipt of new information, any of which can cause us to change our estimate for uncertain tax positions.

## Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest

The net loss attributable to the redeemable non-controlling interest in CK India owned by our minority partners was $55,000 for 2013. Please refer to Note 6, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a further discussion.



## LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

## Cash Flow Summary

Cash at February 2, 2014 was $593 million, which included the impact of $2.993 billion of net proceeds from the senior secured credit facilities entered into in 2013 at the time of the Warnaco acquisition, offset by $2.180 billion of cash paid as consideration for the acquisition and $1.097 billion of debt payments made to repay all outstanding borrowings under our previously outstanding senior secured credit facilities and all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt. In addition, cash at February 2, 2014 included the impact of $500 million of payments on our senior secured credit facilities during the year ended February 2, 2014. Cash at February 2, 2014 excluded a restricted cash balance of $10 million, which was placed into an escrow account prior to year end to contribute funding to our joint venture in Australia in the first quarter of 2014. See the section entitled “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates (Australia, Brazil, China and India Joint Ventures)” below for a further discussion. Cash at February 3, 2013 was $892 million, which included the proceeds from the $700 million senior notes offering undertaken in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. Cash flow in 2014 will be impacted by various factors in addition to those noted below in this “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section, including the amount of debt repayments we make in 2014.

As of February 2, 2014, approximately $467 million of cash and cash equivalents was held by international subsidiaries whose undistributed earnings are considered permanently reinvested. Our intent is to reinvest these funds in international operations. If management decides at a later date to repatriate these funds to the United States, we would be required to provide taxes on these amounts based on applicable United States tax rates, net of foreign taxes already paid.

## Operations

Cash provided by operating activities was $412 million in 2013, as compared with $570 million in 2012. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities as compared to the prior year was primarily driven by the payment of expenses related to the Warnaco acquisition, integration and the related restructuring. Additionally, cash provided by operating activities in 2013 includes a $30 million contribution to fund the defined benefit qualified pension plan we acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition and an additional $30 million contribution to fund our pre-existing pension plans. The factors that affect our cash provided by operating activities have been significantly impacted by the Warnaco acquisition. In the future, we expect that our cash provided by operating activities will generally increase as a result of the acquisition. This increase will generally be used to repay debt, as well as to fund additional capital spending to expand and invest in our businesses, principally for the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses. In addition, the changes in the amount of cash provided and used related to our working capital will be more pronounced as a result of the Warnaco acquisition.

## Acquisition of Warnaco

We completed our acquisition of Warnaco on February 13, 2013. We paid $2.180 billion in cash and issued approximately 8 million shares of our common stock, valued at $926 million, as consideration for the acquisition. In addition, we issued replacement stock awards related to employee stock-based compensation grants valued at $40 million and eliminated a $9 million pre-acquisition liability to Warnaco, both of which for accounting purposes are included in the total consideration of approximately $3.137 billion. The value of the replacement stock awards was determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the Warnaco awards outstanding at the time of the acquisition, reduced by an estimated value of awards to be forfeited, by the proportionate amount of the vesting period that had lapsed as of the acquisition date.

We funded the cash portion and related costs of the acquisition, repaid all outstanding borrowings under our previously outstanding senior secured credit facilities and repaid all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt with the net proceeds of (i) an offering during the fourth quarter of 2012 of $700 million of 4 1/2% senior notes due 2022; and (ii) $3.075 billion of term loans borrowed during the first quarter of 2013 under new senior secured credit facilities. See the discussion in the sections entitled “4 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2022” and “2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities” below for further detail on these activities.

## Sale of Chaps Sportswear Assets

Contemporaneously with our acquisition of Warnaco, Ralph Lauren Corporation reacquired the Chaps license. The Chaps sportswear business was previously operated by Warnaco under such license. In connection with this transaction, we sold all of the assets of the Chaps sportswear business, which consisted principally of inventory, to Ralph Lauren Corporation for gross proceeds of $18 million.



## Sale of Bass

On November 4, 2013, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Bass business for gross proceeds of $49 million. We recorded a loss of $16 million, which represents the excess of the carrying value of the assets over the proceeds received, plus costs to sell. A small number of our Bass stores were excluded from the sale and were deemed to be impaired. As such, we recorded a loss of $1 million during 2013 related to the impaired stores. In addition, we recorded a gain during 2013 of $3 million from writing off certain liabilities as a result of the transaction. We also recognized costs during 2013 related to severance and termination benefits for certain Bass employees, which totaled $2 million.

In connection with the sale, we also guaranteed lease payments for substantially all Bass retail stores included in the sale pursuant to the terms of noncancelable leases expiring on various dates through 2022. We recorded an expense of $4 million during 2013 representing the estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations at the time of the sale.

## Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates (Australia, Brazil, China and India Joint Ventures)

In 2013, we formed a joint venture, PVH Brands Australia Pty. Limited (“PVH Australia”), in Australia, in which we own a 50% economic interest. The joint venture licenses from one of our subsidiaries the rights to distribute and sell certain Calvin Klein brand products in Australia, New Zealand and other island nations in the South Pacific. As part of the joint venture agreement, we contributed to the joint venture our subsidiaries that were operating the Calvin Klein jeans businesses in Australia and New Zealand. Upon completion of this contribution, which took place on the first day of fiscal year 2014, we deconsolidated these subsidiaries. We made a payment of $708,000 to PVH Australia during 2013 to contribute our 50% share of funding. Subsequent to year-end, we made an additional payment of $10 million to PVH Australia to contribute our 50% share of the joint venture funding. Such amount was placed into an escrow account prior to year end and is classified as restricted cash, which is included in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2014.

In 2012, we formed a joint venture, Tommy Hilfiger do Brasil S.A., in Brazil, in which we own a 40% economic interest. The joint venture holds an exclusive license for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in Brazil that became effective on January 4, 2013. We made payments totaling $3 million and $6 million to Tommy Hilfiger do Brasil S.A. during 2013 and 2012, respectively, to contribute our 40% share of the joint venture funding.

In 2010, we formed a joint venture, TH Asia Ltd., in China in which we own a 45% economic interest. The joint venture assumed direct control of the Tommy Hilfiger wholesale and retail distribution business in China from the prior licensee in 2011. We made funding payments with respect to our 45% interest totaling $17 million during 2011.

In 2011, we completed a $30 million acquisition of a 50% economic interest in a company that has since been renamed Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Private Limited (“TH India”). TH India is the direct licensee of the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India for all categories (other than fragrance), operates a wholesale apparel, footwear and handbags business in connection with its license, and sublicenses the trademarks for certain other product categories. We made payments totaling $2 million to TH India in each of 2012 and 2011, to contribute our 50% share of the joint venture funding.

## Acquisition of Russia Franchisee

In 2013, we acquired three Tommy Hilfiger stores in Russia from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee. We paid $6 million as consideration for this transaction. Two additional stores are expected to be acquired in 2014 for approximately $5 million.

## Acquisition of Netherlands Franchisee

In 2012, we acquired from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee in the Netherlands 100% of the share capital of ten affiliated companies, which operate 13 Tommy Hilfiger stores in the Netherlands. We paid $13 million as consideration for this transaction.



## Reacquisition of Tommy Hilfiger Tailored Apparel License

We entered into agreements during 2011 to reacquire from a licensee, prior to the expiration of the license, the rights to distribute Tommy Hilfiger brand tailored apparel in Europe and acquire an outlet store from the licensee. The transfer of the rights and store ownership became effective December 31, 2012. Under these agreements, we made a payment of $10 million to the licensee during 2011 and made an additional payment of $25 million to the licensee during 2012.

## Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures in 2013 were $237 million compared to $211 million in 2012. This increase was due principally to investments in the operations we acquired with Warnaco and in combining Warnaco’s infrastructure with ours. We currently expect capital expenditures in 2014 to be approximately $300 million, which includes a shift into 2014 of expenditures originally expected to occur in 2013. Capital expenditures in 2014 will primarily include continued investments in operations and the infrastructure of the combined company, including information systems, logistics and facilities.

## Tommy Hilfiger India Perpetual License Rights Reacquisition and Contingent Purchase Price Payments

We reacquired in 2011 the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks that had been subject to a perpetual license previously granted to GVM for $25 million. We are required to make annual contingent purchase price payments into 2016 (or, under certain circumstances, into 2017) based on a percentage of annual sales in excess of an agreed upon threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India. Such payments are subject to a $25 million aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. We made contingent purchase price payments of $429,000 and $185,000 during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

In connection with the transaction, we recorded an expense of $21 million in 2011 due to the settlement of an unfavorable contract as a result of a pre-existing relationship with the licensee, as the license provided favorable terms to the licensee.

## Calvin Klein Contingent Purchase Price Payments

In connection with our acquisition of Calvin Klein in 2003, we are obligated to pay Mr. Calvin Klein contingent purchase price payments based on 1.15% of total worldwide net sales (as defined in the agreement governing that acquisition, as amended) of products bearing any of the Calvin Klein brands with respect to sales made through February 12, 2018. A significant portion of the sales on which the payments to Mr. Klein are made are wholesale sales by us and our licensees and other partners to retailers. Such contingent purchase price payments totaled $53 million, $51 million and $51 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We currently expect that such payments will be approximately $55 million in 2014.

## Dividends

Our common stock currently pays annual dividends totaling $0.15 per share. Holders of our Series A convertible preferred stock participated in common stock dividends on an as-converted basis through 2012. The last outstanding shares of Series A convertible preferred stock were converted at the end of 2012 and the series has since been eliminated. Dividends on common stock totaled $12 million, $11 million and $11 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

We currently project that cash dividends on our common stock in 2014 will be approximately $12 million based on our current dividend rate, the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 2, 2014 and our estimates of stock to be issued during 2014 under our stock incentive plans.



## Financing Arrangements

Our capital structure was as follows:

<table><tr><td>(in millions)</td><td>February 2, 2014</td><td>February 3, 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>Current portion of long-term debt</td><td>85</td><td>88</td></tr><tr><td>Capital lease obligations</td><td>25</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>3,878</td><td>2,212</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholders’ equity</td><td>4,335</td><td>3,253</td></tr></table>

In addition, we had $593 million and $892 million of cash and cash equivalents as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, respectively.

## Short-Term Borrowings

One of our Asian subsidiaries has a Yen-denominated overdraft facility with a Japanese bank, which provides for borrowings of up to ¥1.000 billion ($10 million based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and is utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and bear interest at the one-month Japanese interbank borrowing rate (“TIBOR”) plus 0.30%. Such facility renews automatically unless we give notice of termination. As of February 2, 2014, we had $5 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at February 2, 2014 was 0.37%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under this facility during 2013 was approximately $10 million.

One of our European subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has short-term revolving notes with a number of banks at various interest rates, as well as a Euro-denominated overdraft facility, which are used to fund working capital needs. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of February 2, 2014. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under these facilities during 2013 was approximately $25 million.

One of our Asian subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has Rupee-denominated short-term revolving credit facilities with a local lender. These facilities provide for total borrowings of up to Rs195 million ($3 million based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and are utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at various interest rates, primarily based on a base rate set by the lending bank. As of February 2, 2014, we had $2 million of borrowings outstanding under these facilities and the weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at February 2, 2014 was 6.97%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under these facilities during 2013 was approximately $3 million.

One of our Asian subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has a short-term $10 million revolving credit facility to be used to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 1.75% plus the one-month London interbank borrowing rate (“LIBOR”). At the end of each month, amounts outstanding under this facility may be carried forward for additional one-month periods for up to one year. This facility was renewed in December 2013 and may be renewed annually in the future. This facility is subject to certain terms and conditions and may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the lender. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

One of our Asian subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has a Won-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with one lender that provides for borrowings of up to ¥3.000 billion ($3 million based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and is utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the three-month Cost of Funds Index rate plus a specified margin. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

One of our Latin American subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has Real-denominated short-term revolving credit facilities with a number of banks that provide for total available borrowings of R$69 million ($28 million based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and are utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these



facilities bear interest at various interest rates. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

In addition, we have certain other facilities, under which we had no borrowings outstanding as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

## Capital Lease Obligations

Our cash payments for capital lease obligations totaled $10 million, $11 million and $10 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

## 4 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2022

On December 20, 2012, we issued $700 million principal amount of 4 1/2% senior notes due December 15, 2022 in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. Interest on the 4 1/2% notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2013. We paid $16 million of fees in the first quarter of 2013 in connection with the issuance of these notes, which will be amortized over the term of the notes.

We may redeem some or all of these notes at any time prior to December 15, 2017 by paying a “make whole” premium plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Subject to certain conditions, we may also redeem up to 35% of these notes prior to December 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings without having to pay a penalty or “make whole” premium. In addition, we may redeem some or all of these notes on or after December 15, 2017 at specified redemption prices plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

## 7 3/8% Senior Notes Due 2020

On May 6, 2010, we issued $600 million principal amount of 7 3/8% senior notes due May 15, 2020. Interest on the 7 3/8% notes was payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, we received the requisite consents from holders of these notes to amend the indenture governing the notes. The amendment increased the amount of secured indebtedness that we are permitted to incur without equally and ratably securing the notes. Under the terms of the consent solicitation, we paid $6 million during that quarter to the holders.

In March 2014, in connection with the refinancing of our term loans as discussed below in the section entitled “2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities,” we redeemed all of these notes and, pursuant to the terms of the indenture under which the notes were issued, paid a “make whole” premium of $68 million to the holders of the notes.

## 7 3/4% Debentures Due 2023

We have outstanding $100 million of debentures due on November 15, 2023 with a yield to maturity of 7.80%. The debentures accrue interest at the rate of 7 3/4%, which is payable semi-annually.

## 2011 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On May 6, 2010, we entered into senior secured credit facilities, which were amended and restated on March 2, 2011 (the "2011 facilities"). The 2011 facilities consisted of a Euro-denominated Term Loan A facility, a United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A facility, a Euro-denominated Term Loan B facility, a United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility, a United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility, and the other Euro, Japanese Yen and British Pound) revolving credit facilities. The 2011 facilities provided for initial borrowings of up to an aggregate of approximately $1.970 billion (based on applicable exchange rates on March 2, 2011), consisting of (i) an aggregate of approximately $1.520 billion of term loan facilities; and (ii) approximately $450 million of revolving credit facilities.

We made payments of $451 million on our term loans under the 2011 facilities and paid $11 million of fees in cash in connection with the modification of these facilities in 2011. We made additional payments of $300 million on our term loans under the 2011 facilities during 2012.



On February 13, 2013, in connection with the Warnaco acquisition, we modified and extinguished the 2011 facilities and repaid all outstanding borrowings thereunder, as discussed in the section entitled “2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities” below.

## 2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On February 13, 2013, simultaneously with and related to the closing of the Warnaco acquisition, we entered into new senior secured credit facilities (the “2013 facilities”), the proceeds of which were used to fund a portion of the acquisition, repay all outstanding borrowings under the 2011 facilities and repay all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt. The 2013 facilities consist of a $1.700 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan A (recorded net of an original issue discount of $7 million as of the acquisition date), a $1.375 billion United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B (recorded net of an original issue discount of $7 million as of the acquisition date) and senior secured revolving credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $750 million (based on the applicable exchange rates on February 13, 2013), consisting of (a) a $475 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25 million United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facility available in United States dollars or Canadian dollars and (c) a €186 million Euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in Euro, Pounds Sterling, Japanese Yen and Swiss Francs. In connection with entering into the 2013 facilities and repaying all outstanding borrowings under the 2011 facilities and all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt, we paid in 2013 debt issuance costs of $67 million (of which $35 million was expensed as debt modification and extinguishment costs and $33 million is being amortized over the term of the related debt agreement) and recorded additional debt modification and extinguishment costs of $6 million to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs.

The revolving credit facilities include amounts available for letters of credit. As of February 2, 2014, we had drawn no revolving credit borrowings and approximately $56 million of letters of credit. During 2013, we made payments of $500 million on our term loans under the 2013 facilities, the majority of which was voluntary. As of February 2, 2014, we had total term loans outstanding of $2.564 billion, net of original issue discounts. The terms of each of Term Loan A and Term Loan B contain a mandatory quarterly repayment schedule. Due to the above-mentioned voluntary payments, we are not required to make any additional mandatory repayments under Term Loan B prior to maturity.

A portion of both United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facilities is also available for the making of swingline loans. The issuance of such letters of credit and the making of any swingline loan reduces the amount available under the applicable revolving credit facility. So long as certain conditions are satisfied, we may add one or more term loan facilities or increase the commitments under the revolving credit facilities by an aggregate amount not to exceed the greater of (a) $750 million and (b) $1.250 billion as long as the ratio of our senior secured net debt to consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (in each case calculated as set forth in the documentation relating to the 2013 facilities) would not exceed 3 to 1 after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence of such increase, plus, in either case, an amount equal to the aggregate revolving commitments of any defaulting lender (to the extent the commitments with respect thereto have been terminated). The lenders under the 2013 facilities are not required to provide commitments with respect to such additional facilities or increased commitments.

On March 21, 2014 (the “Restatement Date”), we entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2013 facilities (as amended by the Amendment, the “2014 facilities”).

Among other things, the Amendment provides for an additional $350 million principal amount of Term Loan A and an additional $250 million principal amount of Term Loan B and extends the maturity of the Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities from February 13, 2018 to February 13, 2019. The maturity of the Term Loan B remains February 13, 2020.

On the Restatement Date, we borrowed the additional $350 million principal amount of Term Loan A and the additional $250 million principal amount of Term Loan B made available pursuant to the 2014 facilities.

The following is a description of the material terms of the 2014 facilities:

The 2014 facilities consist of a $1.986 billion United States Dollar-denominated Term Loan A, a $1.189 billion United States Dollar-denominated Term Loan B and senior secured revolving credit facilities consisting of (a) a $475 million United States Dollar denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25 million United States Dollar denominated revolving credit facility available in United States Dollars or Canadian Dollars and (c) a €186 million Euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in Euro, Pounds Sterling, Japanese Yen and Swiss Francs.



We have fully drawn the term loans under the 2014 facilities. The revolving credit facilities include amounts available for letters of credit. A portion of each of the United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facilities is also available for the making of swingline loans. The issuance of such letters of credit and the making of any swingline loan reduces the amount available under the applicable revolving credit facility. So long as certain conditions are satisfied, we may add one or more term loan facilities or increase the commitments under the revolving credit facilities by an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (1) the sum of (x) $1.350 billion plus (y) the aggregate amount of all voluntary prepayments of term loans under the facilities and the revolving credit facilities (to the extent, in the case of voluntary prepayments of loans under the revolving credit facilities, there is an equivalent permanent reduction of the revolving commitments) plus (z) an amount equal to the aggregate revolving commitments of any defaulting lender (to the extent the commitments with respect thereto have been terminated) and (2) an additional unlimited amount as long as the ratio of our senior secured net debt to consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (in each case calculated as set forth in the documentation relating to the 2014 facilities) would not exceed 3 to 1 after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence of such increase. The lenders under the 2014 facilities are not required to provide commitments with respect to such additional facilities or increased commitments.

Obligations of ours under the 2014 facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect United States subsidiaries, with certain exceptions. Obligations of the European Borrower under the 2014 facilities are guaranteed by us, substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect United States subsidiaries (with certain exceptions) and Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of ours. We and our domestic subsidiary guarantors have pledged certain of our assets as security for the obligations under the 2014 facilities.

The terms of the Term Loan A facility require us to repay quarterly amounts outstanding under such facility, commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2014. Such amounts will equal 5.00% per annum of the principal amount outstanding on the Restatement Date for the first eight full calendar quarters following the Restatement Date, 7.50% per annum of the principal amount for the four quarters thereafter and 10.00% per annum of the principal amount for the remaining quarters, in each case paid in equal installments and in each case subject to certain customary adjustments, with the balance due on the maturity date of the Term Loan A facility. The terms of the Term Loan B facility require us to repay the outstanding principal amount thereof on the maturity date of the Term Loan B facility. (As of the Restatement Date, we had, through voluntary and mandatory prepayments of amounts outstanding under the Term Loan B facility prior to the Restatement Date, reduced the required quarterly principal payments under the Term Loan B facility set forth in the 2013 facilities such that the only remaining payment is the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan B facility on the maturity date of the Term Loan B facility.)

The outstanding borrowings under the 2014 facilities are prepayable at any time without penalty (other than customary breakage costs and, solely with respect to the Term Loan B facility, any prepayment in connection with a Repricing Event (as defined in the 2014 facilities) that is consummated on or prior to the six-month anniversary of the Restatement Date). The terms of the 2014 facilities require us to repay certain amounts outstanding thereunder with (a) net cash proceeds of the incurrence of certain indebtedness, (b) net cash proceeds of certain asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or condemnation) that exceed certain thresholds, to the extent such proceeds are not reinvested or committed to be reinvested in the business in accordance with customary reinvestment provisions, and (c) a percentage of excess cash flow, which percentage is based upon our net leverage ratio during the relevant fiscal period.

The United States Dollar-denominated borrowings under the 2014 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at our option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the United States federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00% and (iii) a one-month adjusted Eurocurrency rate plus 1.00% (provided, that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the base rate be deemed to be less than 1.75%) or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities (provided, that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the adjusted Eurocurrency rate be deemed to be less than 0.75%).

Canadian Dollar-denominated borrowings under the 2014 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at our option, either (a) a Canadian prime rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the rate of interest per annum that Royal Bank of Canada establishes at its main office in Toronto, Ontario as the reference rate of interest in order to determine interest rates for loans in Canadian Dollars to its Canadian borrowers and (ii) the sum of (x) the average of the rates per annum for Canadian Dollar bankers' acceptances having a term of one month that appears on the display referred to as "CDOR Page" of Reuters Monitor Money Rate Services as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on the date of determination, as reported by the administrative agent (and if such screen is not available, any successor or similar service as may be selected by the administrative agent), and (y) 0.75%, or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities.



The borrowings under the 2014 facilities in currencies other than United States Dollars or Canadian Dollars bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities.

The initial applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan A facility and each revolving credit facility will be 1.75% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 0.75% for base rate loans, respectively. The initial applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan B facility will be 2.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 1.50% for base rate loans, respectively. After the date of delivery of the compliance certificate and financial statements with respect to our fiscal quarter in which the Amendment occurred (i.e., our fiscal quarter ending May 4, 2014), the applicable margin for borrowings under the Term Loan A facility, the Term Loan B facility and the revolving credit facilities will be subject to adjustment based upon our net leverage ratio.

The 2014 facilities require us to comply with customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants. The 2014 facilities require us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum net leverage ratio. The method of calculating all of the components used in such financial covenants is set forth in the 2014 facilities.

The 2014 facilities contain customary events of default, including but not limited to nonpayment; material inaccuracy of representations and warranties; violations of covenants; certain bankruptcies and liquidations; cross-default to material indebtedness; certain material judgments; certain events related to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended; certain events related to certain of the guarantees by us and certain of our subsidiaries, and certain pledges of our assets and those of certain of our subsidiaries, as security for the obligations under the 2014 facilities; and a change in control (as defined in the 2014 facilities).

On March 24, 2014, we redeemed all of our outstanding 7 3/8% senior notes due May 15, 2020 (the “Notes”), representing an aggregate principal amount of $600 million. The redemption price of the Notes was 111.272% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date.

We incurred pre-tax costs totaling approximately $90 million in 2014 in connection with the Amendment and the redemption described above.

During 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on August 19, 2013. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $1.229 billion of our variable rate debt obligation under our United States dollar-denominated senior secured Term Loan A facility, or any replacement facility with similar terms, to fixed rate debt. The agreement remains outstanding, with a notional amount of $1.091 billion as of February 2, 2014. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, our exposure to fluctuations in the one-month LIBOR is eliminated, and we will pay a fixed rate of 0.604%, plus the current applicable margin.

During 2011, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on June 6, 2011. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $632 million of our variable rate debt obligation under our previously outstanding United States dollar-denominated senior secured Term Loan A facility, or any replacement facility with similar terms, to fixed rate debt. Such agreement remains outstanding, with a notional amount of $326 million as of February 2, 2014. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, our exposure to fluctuations in the three-month LIBOR is eliminated, and we will pay a fixed rate of 1.197%, plus the current applicable margin.

The outstanding notional amount of each interest rate swap will be adjusted according to pre-set schedules during the term of each swap agreement such that, based on our projections for future debt repayments, our outstanding debt under the Term Loan A facility is expected to always equal or exceed the then-outstanding combined notional amount of the interest rate swaps.

In addition, during 2011, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement for a 15-month term commencing on June 6, 2011. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of capping the interest rate on an initial notional amount of €166 million of our variable rate debt obligation under the previously outstanding Euro-denominated senior secured Term Loan A and B facilities. Such cap agreement expired September 6, 2012.

The 2013 and 2014 facilities contain covenants that restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs, to take advantage of other business opportunities that may be in our interest or to satisfy our obligations under our other outstanding debt. These covenants restrict our ability to, among other things:



• incur or guarantee additional debt or extend credit;

- make restricted payments, including paying dividends or making distributions on, or redeeming or repurchasing, our capital stock or certain debt;

• make acquisitions and investments;

• dispose of assets;

• engage in transactions with affiliates;

• enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;

• create liens on our assets or engage in sale/leaseback transactions; and

• effect a consolidation or merger, or sell, transfer, or lease all or substantially all of our assets.

The 2013 and 2014 facilities require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum interest coverage and maximum net leverage. A breach of any of these operating or financial covenants would result in a default under the applicable facility. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts then outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable which would result in acceleration of our other debt. If we were unable to repay any such borrowings when due, the lenders could proceed against their collateral, which also secures some of our other indebtedness.

We are also subject to similar covenants and restrictions in connection with our other long-term debt agreements.

As of February 2, 2014, we were in compliance with all applicable financial and non-financial covenants.

As of February 2, 2014, our corporate credit was rated Ba2 by Moody’s with a stable outlook and our issuer credit was rated BB+ by Standard & Poor’s with a stable outlook. Upon the announcement in February 2014 of our intent to refinance our term loans, both ratings were reaffirmed and Moody’s revised our outlook to positive from stable. In assessing our credit strength, we believe that both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s considered, among other things, our capital structure and financial policies as well as our consolidated balance sheet, our historical acquisition activity and other financial information, as well as industry and other qualitative factors.

## Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes, as of February 2, 2014, our contractual cash obligations by future period:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Description</td><td colspan="6">Payments Due by Period</td></tr><tr><td>Total Obligations</td><td>2014</td><td>2015-2016</td><td>2017-2018</td><td>Thereafter</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>(dollars in millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt(1)</td><td>$ 3,975</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 276</td><td>$ 1,275</td><td>$ 2,339</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest payments on long-term debt</td><td>977</td><td>157</td><td>297</td><td>258</td><td>265</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Operating and capital leases(2)</td><td>2,286</td><td>437</td><td>672</td><td>495</td><td>682</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Inventory purchase commitments(3)</td><td>1,184</td><td>1,184</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Minimum contractual royalty payments(4)</td><td>67</td><td>16</td><td>23</td><td>16</td><td>12</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plans(5)</td><td>18</td><td>2</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sponsorship payments(6)</td><td>18</td><td>7</td><td>10</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Severance payments(7)</td><td>34</td><td>24</td><td>10</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other contractual obligations(8)</td><td>25</td><td>24</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total contractual cash obligations</td><td>$ 8,591</td><td>$ 1,943</td><td>$ 1,293</td><td>$ 2,048</td><td>$ 3,307</td><td></td></tr></table>



7 3/4% debentures due November 15, 2023. Please refer to the section above entitled “2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities” for discussion of the changes in our debt structure that would impact the above contractual obligations.

(2) Includes retail store, warehouse, showroom, office and equipment operating leases, as well as capital leases. Retail store operating leases generally provide for payment of direct operating costs in addition to rent. The obligation amounts listed include future minimum lease payments and exclude such direct operating costs. Please refer to Note 15, “Leases,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for further information.

(3) Represents contractual commitments for goods on order and not received or paid for as of February 2, 2014. Substantially all of these goods are expected to be received and the related payments are expected to be made within six months of our year end. This amount does not include foreign currency exchange forward contracts that we have entered into to manage our exposure to exchange rate changes with respect to certain of these purchases. Please refer to Note 9, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for further information.

(4) Our minimum contractual royalty payments arise under numerous license agreements we have with third parties, each of which has different terms. Agreements typically require us to make minimum payments to the licensors of the licensed trademarks based on expected or required minimum levels of sales of licensed products, as well as additional royalty payments based on a percentage of sales when our sales exceed such minimum sales. Certain of our license agreements require that we pay a specified percentage of net sales to the licensor for advertising and promotion of the licensed products, in some cases requiring a minimum amount to be paid. Any advertising payments, with the exception of minimum payments to licensors, are excluded from the minimum contractual royalty payments shown in the table. There is no guarantee that we will exceed the minimum payments under any of these license agreements. However, given our projected sales levels for products covered under these agreements, we currently anticipate that future payments required under our license agreements on an aggregate basis will exceed the contractual minimums shown in the table.

(5) We have an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan covering three current and 15 retired executives under which the participants will receive a predetermined amount during the 10 years following the attainment of age 65, provided that prior to the termination of employment with us, the participant has been in such plan for at least 10 years and has attained age 55.

(6) Represents payment obligations for sponsorships. We have agreements relating to our sponsorship of the Barclay’s Center, the Brooklyn Nets and certain other professional sports teams and athletes and other similar sponsorships.

(7) Represents severance payment obligations primarily related to the acquisition and integration of Warnaco.

(8) Represents a payment of $10 million to PVH Australia to contribute our 50% share of the joint venture funding, a payment of $5 million to acquire two additional Tommy Hilfiger stores in Russia from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee and other miscellaneous contractual obligations.

Not included in the above table are contingent purchase price payments we are obligated to pay Mr. Calvin Klein based on 1.15% of total worldwide net sales, as defined in the agreement (as amended) governing the Calvin Klein acquisition, of products bearing any of the Calvin Klein brands and are required to be made with respect to sales made through February 12, 2018. A significant portion of the sales on which the payments to Mr. Klein are made are wholesale sales by us and our licensees and other partners to retailers. Such contingent purchase price payments totaled $53 million, $51 million and $51 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Not included in the above table are contingent purchase price payments we are obligated to pay GVM into 2016 (or, under certain circumstances, into 2017) based on a percentage of annual sales in excess of an agreed upon threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India. Such payments are subject to a $25 million aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. We made contingent purchase price payments of $429,000 and $185,000 during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Not included in the above table are contributions to our defined benefit qualified pension plans, or payments to employees and retirees in connection with our supplemental executive retirement, supplemental pension and postretirement health plans. Contractual cash obligations for these plans cannot be determined due to the number of assumptions required to estimate our future benefit obligations, including return on assets, discount rate and future compensation increases. The liabilities associated with these plans are presented in Note 11, “Retirement and Benefit Plans,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report. We currently estimate that we will make contributions of approximately $3 million to our pension plans in 2014. Our actual contributions may differ from our planned contributions due to many



factors, including changes in tax and other benefit laws, or significant differences between expected and actual pension asset performance or interest rates.

Not included in the above table are $541 million of net potential cash obligations associated with uncertain tax positions due to the uncertainty regarding the future cash outflows associated with such obligations. Please refer to Note 8, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for further information related to uncertain tax positions.

Not included in the above table are $17 million of asset retirement obligations related to leased office and retail store locations due to the uncertainty of timing of future cash outflows associated with such obligations. Please refer to Note 21, “Other Comments,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for further information related to asset retirement obligations.

Not included in the above table are obligations related to our non-exclusive buying agency agreement with Li & Fung due to uncertainty of the timing and amounts of future cash flows associated with such obligations. Under the terms of the agreement, we are required to use Li & Fung for at least 54% of our global sourcing needs for Tommy Hilfiger products, or otherwise pay a penalty. The buying agency agreement with Li & Fung is terminable by us upon 12 months' prior notice for any reason, and is terminable by either party (i) upon six months' prior notice in the event of a material breach by the other party and (ii) immediately upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy or insolvency events relating to the other party.

Not included in the above table are contractual royalty obligations related to our perpetual license agreement with Speedo International Limited. Under the terms of the agreement, our contractual minimum payments each year are $1 million, which is subject to annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index.

## Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect, or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect, on our financial position, changes in financial position, revenue, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

## MARKET RISK—INTEREST AND EXCHANGE RATE SENSITIVITY

Financial instruments held by us as of February 2, 2014 include cash and cash equivalents, short and long-term debt, foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements. Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report outlines the fair value of our financial instruments as of February 2, 2014. Cash and cash equivalents held by us are affected by short-term interest rates. Due to the currently low rates of return we are receiving on our cash equivalents, the potential for a significant decrease in short-term interest rates is low and, therefore, a further decrease would not have a material impact on our interest income. However, there is potential for a more significant increase in short-term interest rates, which could have a more material impact on our interest income. Given our balance of cash and cash equivalents at February 2, 2014, the effect of a 10 basis point increase in short-term interest rates on our interest income would be approximately $600,000 annually. In March 2014, we amended and restated our 2013 senior secured credit facilities, borrowed an additional $600 million under the facilities and redeemed $600 million principal amount 73/8% senior notes due May 15, 2020. Please refer to Note 22, “Subsequent Events (Unaudited),” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a further discussion of our refinanced credit facility. Borrowings under our 2014 senior secured credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus a variable rate. As such, our credit facilities expose us to market risk for changes in interest rates. As noted above in the section entitled “Financing Arrangements,” we had previously entered into interest rate swap agreements for the intended purpose of reducing our exposure to interest rate volatility. As of April 1, 2014, after taking into account the effect of those interest rate swap agreements, approximately 55% of our total debt was at a fixed rate, with the remainder at variable rates. Given our debt position at April 1, 2014, the effect of a 10 basis point increase in interest rates on our interest expense would be approximately $600,000 annually. Such amount excludes any impact from our United States dollar-denominated Term Loan B facility, which would currently not be impacted by a 10 basis point increase in interest rates due to its adjusted Eurocurrency rate floor of 0.75%. Please refer to Note 7, “Debt,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a further discussion of our credit facilities and interest rate swap agreements.

Our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses each have substantial international components, which expose us to significant foreign exchange risk. Accordingly, the impact of a strengthening United States dollar, particularly against the Euro, the Brazilian Real, the Japanese Yen, the Korean Won, the British Pound, the Canadian dollar, the Mexican Peso, the Indian



Rupee and the Chinese Yuan, will have a negative impact on our results of operations. Our Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses purchase the majority of the products that they sell in United States dollars, which exposes the international operations of each of these businesses to foreign exchange risk as the United States dollar fluctuates. To help manage these exposures, we currently use and plan to continue to use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments.

In addition, we have exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on certain intercompany loans. We currently use and plan to continue to use foreign currency forward exchange contracts to mitigate this exposure.

## SEASONALITY

Our business generally follows a seasonal pattern. Our wholesale businesses tend to generate higher levels of sales in the first and third quarters, while our retail businesses tend to generate higher levels of sales in the fourth quarter. Royalty, advertising and other revenue tends to be earned somewhat evenly throughout the year, although the third quarter has the highest level of royalty revenue due to higher sales by licensees in advance of the holiday selling season. We expect this seasonal pattern will generally continue.

## RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued in February 2013 guidance that requires an entity to provide information about significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). For amounts that are required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity must report the amounts by component and their corresponding effect on the respective line items of net income. Such information is required to be presented either on the face of the financial statements or as a separate disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified to net income in their entirety, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2013 and elected to present a separate disclosure in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption did not have any impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

The FASB issued in March 2013 guidance that requires an entity to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income when it ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is a foreign entity if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity. For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment related to the investment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such investment. This guidance becomes effective for us in the first quarter of 2014. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

The FASB issued in July 2013 guidance that requires an entity to present an uncertain tax position, or a portion of an uncertain tax position, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward. However, to the extent (i) a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or (ii) the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the uncertain tax position should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. This guidance becomes effective prospectively for us in the first quarter of 2014. The adoption is not expected to have any impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

## CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Our significant accounting policies are outlined in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report. We believe that the following are the more critical judgmental areas in the application of our accounting policies that currently affect our financial position and results of operations:

Sales allowances and returns—We have arrangements with many of our department and specialty store customers to support their sales of our products. We establish accruals which, based on a review of the individual customer arrangements and the expected performance of our products in their stores, we believe will be required to satisfy our sales allowance obligations. We also establish accruals, which are based on historical data and authorized amounts, that we believe are necessary to provide



for sales allowances and inventory returns. It is possible that the accrual estimates could vary from actual results, which would require adjustment to the allowance and returns accruals.

Inventories—Inventories are comprised principally of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost for principally all wholesale apparel inventories in North America and certain wholesale and retail apparel inventories in Asia and Latin America is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Cost for all other inventories is determined using the weighted average cost method. We review current business trends, inventory agings and discontinued merchandise categories to determine adjustments which we estimate will be needed to liquidate existing clearance inventories and reduce inventories to the lower of cost or market. We believe that all inventory writedowns required at February 2, 2014 have been recorded. If market conditions were to change, it is possible that the required level of inventory reserves would need to be adjusted.

Asset impairments—During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we determined that the long-lived assets in certain of our retail stores and other locations were not recoverable, which resulted in us recording impairment charges. In order to calculate the impairment charges, we estimated the undiscounted future cash flows and the related fair value of each asset. The undiscounted future cash flows for each asset were estimated using current sales trends and other factors. If different assumptions had been used for future sales trends, the recorded impairment charges could have been significantly higher or lower. Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report includes a further discussion of the circumstances surrounding the impairments and the assumptions related to the impairment charges.

Allowance for doubtful accounts—Accounts receivable, as presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, is net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable and assessments of collectibility based on historic trends, the financial condition of our customers and an evaluation of economic conditions. Because we cannot predict future changes in economic conditions and in the financial stability of our customers, actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates and could impact our allowance for doubtful accounts.

Income taxes—Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. FASB guidance on accounting for income taxes requires that deferred tax assets be evaluated for future realization and reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including our recent earnings experience and expectations of future taxable income by taxing jurisdiction, the carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors. The actual realization of deferred tax assets may differ significantly from the amounts we have recorded.

During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Accounting for income taxes requires a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the tax position will be fully sustained upon review by taxing authorities, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount with a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. For tax positions that are 50 percent or less likely of being sustained upon audit, we do not recognize any portion of that benefit in the financial statements. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. Our actual results could differ materially from our current estimates.

Goodwill and other intangible assets—Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, at the beginning of the third quarter of each fiscal year, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is done at a reporting unit level. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment, called a component. However, two or more components of an operating segment will be aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics.

We adopted in 2012 new authoritative accounting guidance that allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a more detailed quantitative impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We would perform the quantitative test if our qualitative assessment determined it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. We may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative test for any reporting unit or asset. Qualitative factors that we consider as part of our assessment include a comparison of the most recent valuation to reporting unit carrying amounts, an increase in our



market capitalization and its implied impact on reporting unit fair value, industry and market conditions, macroeconomic conditions, trends in product costs and financial performance of our businesses. If we perform the quantitative test for any reporting units, we use a discounted cash flow method to calculate fair value. The discounted cash flow method is based on the present value of projected cash flows. Assumptions used in these cash flow projections are generally consistent with our internal forecasts. The estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate that represents the weighted average cost of capital. The weighted average cost of capital is based on a number of variables, including the equity-risk premium and risk-free interest rate. Management believes the assumptions used for the impairment tests are consistent with those that would be utilized by a market participant performing similar analyses and valuations. Any projected cash flows and estimates of weighted average cost of capital may be impacted by adverse changes in market and economic conditions and are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances that exist at the time of the valuation. No impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets resulted from our impairment tests in 2013. If different assumptions for our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests had been applied, significantly different outcomes could have resulted. Based upon the results of our annual goodwill impairment testing during 2013 and our future cash flow projections, we currently do not believe that any of our reporting units are at significant risk for a future material goodwill impairment.

Pension benefits—Included in the calculations of expense and liabilities for our pension plans are various assumptions, including return on assets, discount rate and future compensation increases. Note 11, “Retirement and Benefit Plans,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report sets forth the significant rate assumptions used in performing certain calculations related to our pension plans. Actual results could differ from these assumptions, which would require adjustments to our balance sheet and could result in volatility in our future pension expense. Holding all other assumptions constant, a 1% increase or decrease in the assumed rate of return on assets would decrease or increase, respectively, 2014 net benefit cost by approximately $6 million. Likewise, a 0.25% increase or decrease in the assumed discount rate would decrease or increase, respectively, 2014 net periodic pension expense by approximately $24 million. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in our operating results in the year in which they occur. These gains and losses are measured at least annually at the end of our fiscal year and, as such, are generally recorded during the fourth quarter of each year.

Stock-based compensation—Accounting for stock-based compensation requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to determine the fair value of our stock options. This model uses assumptions that include the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, expected dividend yield and expected life of the options. The fair value of restricted stock units and restricted stock are determined based on the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of our stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of contingently issuable performance shares that are not based on market conditions is based on the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant, reduced for the present value of any dividends expected to be paid on our common stock during the performance cycle, as the contingently issuable performance shares do not accrue dividends prior to being earned. We record expense for contingently issuable performance shares that are not based on market conditions based on our current expectations of the probable number of shares that will ultimately be issued. The fair value of contingently issuable performance shares that are subject to market conditions was established using a Monte Carlo Simulation model. We record expense for the awards that are subject to market conditions ratably over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class and historical experience. Actual results and future estimates may differ substantially from our current estimates.

## Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Information with respect to Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk appears under the heading “Market Risk—Interest and Exchange Rate Sensitivity” in Item 7.

## Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See page F-1 of this report for a listing of the consolidated financial statements and supplementary data included in this report.



## Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

## Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

## Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating & Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

## Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit report on our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting can be found on pages F-59 and F-60.

On February 13, 2013, we completed our acquisition of Warnaco. As the acquisition occurred during 2013, management excluded the Warnaco business from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting. As of February 2, 2014 and for the fiscal year then ended, total assets and total revenue of the Warnaco business represented 40% and 25%, respectively, of our consolidated assets and revenue.

## Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We did not identify any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

## Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.



## PART III

## Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information with respect to Directors of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Election of Directors” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014. Information with respect to compliance by our officers and directors with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014. Information with respect to our executive officers is contained in the section entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I, Item 1 of this report. Information with respect to the procedure by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors and with respect to our Audit Committee, our Audit Committee Financial Expert and our Code of Ethics is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Election of Directors” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014.

## Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information with respect to Executive Compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014.

## Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information with respect to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014.

## Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information with respect to Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Transactions with Related Persons,” “Election of Directors” and “Director Compensation” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014.

## Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information with respect to Principal Accounting Fees and Services is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Ratification of the Appointment of Auditors” in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 19, 2014.



## PART IV

## Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) See page F-1 for a listing of the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report.

(a)(2) See page F-1 for a listing of consolidated financial statement schedules submitted as part of this report.

(a)(3) The following exhibits are included in this report:

## Exhibit Number

2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2002, among Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Calvin Klein, Inc., Calvin Klein (Europe), Inc., Calvin Klein (Europe II) Corp., Calvin Klein Europe S.r.l., CK Service Corp., Calvin Klein, Barry Schwartz, Trust for the Benefit of the Issue of Calvin Klein, Trust for the Benefit of the Issue of Barry Schwartz, Stephanie Schwartz-Ferdman and Jonathan Schwartz (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 20, 2002). The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedules to the Commission upon request.

2.2 Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2010, by and among Tommy Hilfiger Corporation, Tommy Hilfiger B.V., Tommy Hilfiger Holding S.á.r.l, Stichting Administratiekantoor Elmira, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Prince 2 B.V. and, solely for the purpose of certain sections thereof, Asian and Western Classics B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed June 10, 2010). The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedules to the Commission upon request.

2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2012, by and among The Warnaco Group, Inc., PVH Corp. and Wand Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2012).

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 1977); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 27, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3B to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 1985); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 2, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1988); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1994); Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 20, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 28, 1996); Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007); Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 23 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 29, 2011).

3.2 Certificate of Designation of Series A Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock, filed June 10, 1986 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the document filed as Exhibit 3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 1986).

3.3 Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2003); Corrected Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, dated April 17, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2003).

3.4 Certificate Eliminating Reference to Series B Convertible Preferred Stock from Certificate of Incorporation of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, filed June 12, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007).

3.5 Certificate Eliminating Reference To Series A Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock From Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 28, 2007).

3.6 Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 2010).



3.7 Certificate Eliminating Reference to Series A Convertible Preferred Stock From Certificate of Incorporation of PVH Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 3, 2013).

3.8 By-Laws of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, as amended through February 2, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2012).

4.1 Specimen of Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011).

4.2 Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1993, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 33-50751) filed on October 26, 1993); First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 17, 2002 to Indenture dated as of November 1, 1993 between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2002); Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 12, 2002 to Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1993, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2003); Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010); Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2013 to Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1993, between PVH Corp. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 5, 2013).

4.3 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2010, by and among Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, LNK Partners, L.P. and LNK Partners (Parallel), L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010).

4.4 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2010, by and between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and MSD Brand Investments, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010).

4.5 Stockholders Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2010, by and among Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, LNK Partners, L.P. and LNK Partners (Parallel), L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010).

4.6 Stockholder Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2010, by and between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and MSD Brand Investments, LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010).

4.7 Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010).

4.8 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 8, 2012, to Indenture dated as of May 6, 2010, between PVH Corp. (formerly known as “Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013).

4.9 Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2012, between PVH Corp. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 20, 2012).

*10.1 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Capital Accumulation Plan (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 16, 1987); Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Amendment to Capital Accumulation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(n) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 1987); Form of Agreement amending Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Capital Accumulation Plan with respect to individual participants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(1) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1988); Form of Agreement amending Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Capital Accumulation Plan with respect to individual participants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 1995).

*10.2 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Supplemental Defined Benefit Plan, dated January 1, 1991, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 4, 2007).



 \( ^{*} $ 10.3 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan, effective as of January 1, 1991 and amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 4, 2007).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.4 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, effective as of April 29, 1997, as amended through September 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2006).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.5 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan option certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2005).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.6 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, effective as of April 27, 2000, as amended through September 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2006).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.7 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan option certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2005).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.8 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan, effective as of May 1, 2003, as amended through September 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2006).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.9 Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan option certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2005).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.10 Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2008, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Emanuel Chirico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009); First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Emanuel Chirico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010); Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Emanuel Chirico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010); Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 28, 2011, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Emanuel Chirico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 28, 2011).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.11 Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2008, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Francis K. Duane (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009); First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Francis K. Duane (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010); Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 28, 2011, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Francis K. Duane (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 28, 2011).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.12 Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2008, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and P. Thomas Murry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009); First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010, between Calvin Klein, Inc. and Paul Thomas Murry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010); Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 28, 2011, between Calvin Klein, Inc. and Paul Thomas Murry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 28, 2011); Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2013, between Calvin Klein, Inc. and Paul Thomas Murry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2013); Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2014, between Calvin Klein, Inc. and Paul Thomas Murry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 25, 2014).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.13 Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2008, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Michael Shaffer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009); First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 28, 2011, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Michael Shaffer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 28, 2011).

10.14 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2005, by and among Warnaco, Inc., Fingen Apparel N.V., Fingen S.p.A., Euro Cormar S.p.A. and Calvin Klein, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 22, 2005).



 \( ^{*} $ 10.15 PVH Corp. Performance Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated effective May 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 26, 2013).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.16 PVH Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 26, 2013).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.17 PVH Corp. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective April 26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 25, 2012).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.18 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Directors under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 16, 2006); Revised Form of Stock Option Agreement for Directors under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.19 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Associates under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 11, 2007); Revised Form of Stock Option Agreement for Associates under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.20 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Associates under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 11, 2007); Revised Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Associates under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 6, 2007); Revised Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of July 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 3, 2008); Revised Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Associates under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of September 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.21 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated July 1, 2008, between Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Allen Sirkin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 3, 2008).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.22 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Special Grants to Allen Sirkin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.23 Form of Amendment to Outstanding Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements with Associates under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated November 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.24 Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 8, 2007); Revised Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of April 30, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 2008); Revised Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of December 16, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009); Revised Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the PVH Corp. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of April 25, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 29, 2012); Alternative Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement under the PVH Corp. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 5, 2013).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.25 Revised Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Directors under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of July 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 3, 2008); Revised Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Directors under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of September 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009); Revised Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Directors under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of June 24, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010).



 \( ^{*} $ 10.26 Form of Amendment to Outstanding Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements with Directors under the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated November 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2009).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.27 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Phillips-Van Heusen and Emanuel Chirico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 1, 2009).

10.28 Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2010, among Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Tommy Hilfiger B.V., certain subsidiaries of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Barclays Capital as Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Lead Bookrunner, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Joint Lead Arranger, Joint Lead Bookrunner and Syndication Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC as Joint Lead Bookrunner and Co-Documentation Agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as Joint Lead Bookrunner and Co-Documentation Agent, and RBC Capital Markets as Joint Lead Bookrunner and Co-Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended August 1, 2010 filed on October 29, 2010); First Amendment to Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2010 to Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2010, among Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Tommy Hilfiger B.V., certain subsidiaries of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Barclays Capital as Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Lead Bookrunner, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Joint Lead Arranger, Joint Lead Bookrunner and Syndication Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC as Joint Lead Bookrunner and Co-Documentation Agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as Joint Lead Bookrunner and Co-Documentation Agent, and RBC Capital Markets as Joint Lead Bookrunner and Co-Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2010).  \( * $ 

10.29 Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2011, among Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Tommy Hilfiger B.V., certain subsidiaries of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, the lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2011, filed on February 2, 2012).***

10.30 Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2013, among PVH Corp., Tommy Hilfiger B.V., certain subsidiaries of PVH Corp., Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Lead Bookrunner, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated as Co-Syndication Agent, Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Lead Bookrunner, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as Co-Syndication Agent, Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Lead Bookrunner, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as Co-Documentation Agent and Joint Lead Bookrunner, Royal Bank of Canada as Co-Documentation Agent, and RBC Capital Markets as Joint Lead Bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 5, 2013).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.31 Schedule of Non-Management Directors’ Fees, effective June 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 29, 2012).

 \( ^{*} $ 10.32 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2010, between Tommy Hilfiger Group, B.V. and Fred Gehring (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2011); Addendum to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2010, between Tommy Hilfiger Group, B.V. and Fred Gehring (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2011); Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2013, between PVH B.V. and Fred Gehring (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2013).

+10.33 Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2013, between PVH B.V. and Fred Gehring.

+21 PVH Corp. Subsidiaries.

+23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

+31.1 Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

+31.2 Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

+32.1 Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

+32.2 Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.



+101.INS XBRL Instance Document

+101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

+101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

+101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

+101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

+101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

+ Filed or furnished herewith.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of this report.

** Certain Confidential Information contained in this Exhibit was omitted, pursuant to the grant of confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by means of redacting portions of the text and replacing each of the redacted portions with an asterisk. A complete copy of this Exhibit has been previously filed separately with the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission without the redaction.

*** Certain Confidential Information contained in this exhibit was omitted, pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(b) Exhibits: See (a)(3) above for a listing of the exhibits included as part of this report.

(c) Financial Statement Schedules: See page F-1 for a listing of the consolidated financial statement schedules submitted as part of this report.



## SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: April 3, 2014

PVH CORP.

By: /s/ EMANUEL CHIRICO

Emanuel Chirico

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



<table><tr><td>Signature</td><td>Title</td><td>Date</td></tr><tr><td>/s/ EMANUEL CHIRICO</td><td>Chairman and Chief Executive Officer</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Emanuel Chirico</td><td>(Principal Executive Officer)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ MICHAEL SHAFFER</td><td>Executive Vice President and Chief Operating &amp; Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Michael Shaffer</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ BRUCE GOLDSTEIN</td><td>Senior Vice President and Controller</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Bruce Goldstein</td><td>(Principal Accounting Officer)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ FRED GEHRING</td><td>Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Hilfiger and PVH International Operations and Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Fred Gehring</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ MARY BAGLIVO</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Mary Baglivo</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ BRENT CALLINICOS</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Brent Callinicos</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ JUAN FIGUEREO</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Juan Figuero</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ JOSEPH B. FULLER</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Joseph B. Fuller</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ MARGARET L. JENKINS</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Margaret L. Jenkins</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ BRUCE MAGGIN</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Bruce Maggin</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ V. JAMES MARINO</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>V. James Marino</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ HELEN MCCLUSKEY</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Helen McCluskey</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ HENRY NASELLA</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Henry Nasella</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ RITA M. RODRIGUEZ</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Rita M. Rodriguez</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ EDWARD ROSENFELD</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Edward Rosenfeld</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>/s/ CRAIG RYDIN</td><td>Director</td><td>April 3, 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Craig Rydin</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>



## Exhibit Index

10.33 Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2013, between PVH B.V. and Fred Gehring.

21 PVH Corp. Subsidiaries.

23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1 Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.2 Certification of Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document



## FORM 10-K-ITEM 15(a)(1) and 15(a)(2)

## PVH CORP.

## INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

15(a)(1) The following consolidated financial statements and supplementary data are included in Item 8 of this report:

Consolidated Income Statements—Years Ended February 2, 2014, February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012 F-2

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income—Years Ended February 2, 2014, February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012 F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets—February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013 F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years Ended February 2, 2014, February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012 F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest—Years Ended February 2, 2014, February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012 F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7

Selected Quarterly Financial Data - Unaudited F-57

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting F-59

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-60

Five Year Financial Summary F-62

15(a)(2) The following consolidated financial statement schedule is included herein:

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts F-64

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.



## PVH CORP.

## CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share data)

<table><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>$ 7,806,140</td><td>$ 5,540,821</td><td>$ 5,410,028</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>290,677</td><td>370,019</td><td>356,035</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>89,534</td><td>132,159</td><td>124,561</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of goods sold</td><td>8,186,351</td><td>6,042,999</td><td>5,890,624</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>3,967,081</td><td>2,793,769</td><td>2,834,735</td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>4,219,270</td><td>3,249,230</td><td>3,055,889</td></tr><tr><td>Debt modification and extinguishment costs</td><td>3,673,469</td><td>2,594,315</td><td>2,549,850</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, net</td><td>40,395</td><td>—</td><td>16,233</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes</td><td>8,056</td><td>5,447</td><td>1,367</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>513,462</td><td>660,362</td><td>491,173</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>192,199</td><td>118,747</td><td>129,355</td></tr><tr><td>Income before taxes</td><td>7,503</td><td>1,497</td><td>1,267</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense</td><td>328,766</td><td>543,112</td><td>363,085</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>185,284</td><td>109,272</td><td>87,388</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>143,482</td><td>433,840</td><td>275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>(55)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Basic net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 143,537</td><td>$ 433,840</td><td>$ 275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 1.77</td><td>$ 5.98</td><td>$ 3.86</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$ 1.74</td><td>$ 5.87</td><td>$ 3.78</td></tr></table>



## PVH CORP.

## CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)

<table><tr><td>Net income</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive (loss) income:</td><td>$ 143,482</td><td>$ 433,840</td><td>$ 275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (benefit) expense of (66), $469 and (1,070)</td><td>(105,623)</td><td>86,492</td><td>(82,062)</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit related to pension and postretirement plans, net of tax (benefit) of (338), (338) and (344)</td><td>(541)</td><td>(542)</td><td>(535)</td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized and realized gain (loss) on effective hedges, net of tax (benefit) expense of (260), (2,681 and (2,822)</td><td>6,510</td><td>(19,903)</td><td>18,611</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive income</td><td>43,828</td><td>499,887</td><td>211,711</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>(2,149)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 45,977</td><td>$ 499,887</td><td>$ 211,711</td></tr></table>



## PVH CORP.

## CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

<table><tr><td></td><td>February 2, 2014</td><td>February 3, 2013</td></tr><tr><td>ASSETS</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current Assets:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 593,159</td><td>$ 892,209</td></tr><tr><td>Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $26,361 and $16,114</td><td>730,251</td><td>418,251</td></tr><tr><td>Other receivables</td><td>30,882</td><td>23,073</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories, net</td><td>1,280,958</td><td>878,415</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses</td><td>151,911</td><td>157,802</td></tr><tr><td>Other, including deferred taxes of $155,102 and $38,310</td><td>211,431</td><td>67,256</td></tr><tr><td>Total Current Assets</td><td>2,998,592</td><td>2,437,006</td></tr><tr><td>Property, Plant and Equipment, net</td><td>712,078</td><td>561,335</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill</td><td>3,506,771</td><td>1,958,887</td></tr><tr><td>Tradenames</td><td>3,010,274</td><td>2,413,809</td></tr><tr><td>Other Intangibles, net</td><td>1,041,915</td><td>167,196</td></tr><tr><td>Other Assets, including deferred taxes of $35,191 and $11,603</td><td>305,948</td><td>193,454</td></tr><tr><td>Total Assets</td><td>$11,575,578</td><td>$ 7,731,687</td></tr></table>

## LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

<table><tr><td>Current Liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable</td><td>$ 582,916</td><td>$ 377,231</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses, including deferred taxes of $1,138 and $0</td><td>844,182</td><td>646,130</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred revenue</td><td>33,503</td><td>40,239</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings</td><td>6,796</td><td>10,847</td></tr><tr><td>Current portion of long-term debt</td><td>85,000</td><td>88,000</td></tr><tr><td>Total Current Liabilities</td><td>1,552,397</td><td>1,162,447</td></tr><tr><td>Long-Term Debt</td><td>3,878,221</td><td>2,211,642</td></tr><tr><td>Other Liabilities, including deferred taxes of $1,016,647 and $539,934</td><td>1,804,181</td><td>1,105,029</td></tr><tr><td>Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest</td><td>5,600</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholders&#x27; Equity:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Preferred stock, par value $100 per share; 150,000 total shares authorized</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Common stock, par value $1 per share; 240,000,000 shares authorized; 82,679,574 and 73,324,491 shares issued</td><td>82,680</td><td>73,324</td></tr><tr><td>Additional paid in capital - common stock</td><td>2,696,578</td><td>1,623,693</td></tr><tr><td>Retained earnings</td><td>1,574,768</td><td>1,445,673</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated other comprehensive income</td><td>42,322</td><td>139,882</td></tr><tr><td>Less: 512,702 and 413,596 shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost</td><td>(61,169)</td><td>(30,003)</td></tr><tr><td>Total Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td><td>4,335,179</td><td>3,252,569</td></tr><tr><td>Total Liabilities, Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest and Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td><td>$11,575,578</td><td>$ 7,731,687</td></tr></table>

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



## CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>OPERATING ACTIVITIES</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$ 143,482</td><td>$ 433,840</td><td>$ 275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization</td><td>313,594</td><td>140,356</td><td>132,010</td></tr><tr><td>Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, net</td><td>(8,056)</td><td>(5,447)</td><td>(1,367)</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred taxes</td><td>(62,178)</td><td>49,987</td><td>14,883</td></tr><tr><td>Stock-based compensation expense</td><td>57,954</td><td>33,599</td><td>40,938</td></tr><tr><td>Impairment of long-lived assets</td><td>8,757</td><td>7,475</td><td>7,686</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial (gain) loss on retirement and benefit plans</td><td>(52,539)</td><td>28,142</td><td>76,120</td></tr><tr><td>Debt modification and extinguishment costs</td><td>40,395</td><td>—</td><td>16,233</td></tr><tr><td>Write-down of assets related to sale of Bass</td><td>15,997</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>(Gain) loss on (amendment) settlement of contracts</td><td>(24,309)</td><td>—</td><td>20,709</td></tr><tr><td>Changes in operating assets and liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trade receivables, net</td><td>(31,650)</td><td>55,694</td><td>(40,840)</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories, net</td><td>(44,307)</td><td>(57,518)</td><td>(111,248)</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue</td><td>(41,246)</td><td>86,593</td><td>48,224</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses</td><td>52,420</td><td>(44,275)</td><td>(37,065)</td></tr><tr><td>Employer pension contributions</td><td>(60,000)</td><td>(105,000)</td><td>(20,020)</td></tr><tr><td>Other, net</td><td>103,545</td><td>(53,909)</td><td>68,761</td></tr><tr><td>Net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>411,859</td><td>569,537</td><td>490,721</td></tr><tr><td>INVESTING ACTIVITIES(1)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired</td><td>(1,821,362)</td><td>(37,856)</td><td>(34,641)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash received for sale of Bass</td><td>49,236</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Cash received for sale of Chaps sportswear assets</td><td>18,278</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Investments in unconsolidated affiliates</td><td>(3,468)</td><td>(8,364)</td><td>(48,700)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchase of property, plant and equipment</td><td>(237,142)</td><td>(210,554)</td><td>(169,841)</td></tr><tr><td>Contingent purchase price payments</td><td>(53,202)</td><td>(51,159)</td><td>(50,679)</td></tr><tr><td>Change in restricted cash</td><td>(9,669)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net cash used by investing activities</td><td>(2,057,329)</td><td>(307,933)</td><td>(303,861)</td></tr><tr><td>FINANCING ACTIVITIES(1)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net proceeds from revolving credit facilities</td><td>950</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net (payments on) proceeds from short-term borrowings</td><td>(31,928)</td><td>(2,193)</td><td>8,172</td></tr><tr><td>Repayment of old credit facilities</td><td>(900,000)</td><td>(299,598)</td><td>(450,725)</td></tr><tr><td>Repayment of new credit facilities</td><td>(500,188)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Repayment of Warnaco&#x27;s previously outstanding debt</td><td>(197,000)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from new credit facilities, net of related fees</td><td>2,993,430</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Payment of 2011 debt modification and extinguishment costs</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(10,634)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds from issuance of senior notes</td><td>—</td><td>700,000</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Payment of fees associated with issuance of senior notes</td><td>(16,257)</td><td>(5,749)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net proceeds from settlement of awards under stock plans</td><td>51,571</td><td>13,271</td><td>24,457</td></tr><tr><td>Excess tax benefits from awards under stock plans</td><td>37,639</td><td>14,889</td><td>11,593</td></tr><tr><td>Cash dividends</td><td>(12,293)</td><td>(10,985)</td><td>(10,874)</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of treasury shares</td><td>(61,435)</td><td>(13,984)</td><td>(5,270)</td></tr><tr><td>Payments of capital lease obligations</td><td>(9,596)</td><td>(10,836)</td><td>(10,380)</td></tr><tr><td>Net cash provided (used) by financing activities</td><td>1,354,893</td><td>384,815</td><td>(443,661)</td></tr><tr><td>Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>(8,473)</td><td>12,593</td><td>(8,720)</td></tr><tr><td>(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>(299,050)</td><td>659,012</td><td>(265,521)</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year</td><td>892,209</td><td>233,197</td><td>498,718</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents at end of year</td><td>$ 593,159</td><td>$ 892,209</td><td>$ 233,197</td></tr></table>

(1) See Note 18 for information on noncash investing and financing transactions.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



## PVH CORP.

## CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest</td><td colspan="3">Common Stock</td><td rowspan="2">Additional Paid In Capital-Common Stock</td><td rowspan="2">Retained Earnings</td><td rowspan="2">Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income</td><td rowspan="2">Treasury Stock</td><td rowspan="2">Total Stockholders&#x27; Equity</td></tr><tr><td>Preferred Stock</td><td>Shares</td><td>$1 par Value</td></tr><tr><td>January 30, 2011</td><td></td><td>$ 188,595</td><td>67,234,567</td><td>$ 67,235</td><td>$ 1,301,647</td><td>$ 757,995</td><td>$ 137,821</td><td>$ (10,749)</td><td>$ 2,442,544</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>275,697</td><td></td><td></td><td>275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit related to pension and postretirement plans, net of tax (benefit) of ($(344)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(535)</td><td></td><td>(535)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (benefit) of ($1,070)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(82,062)</td><td></td><td>(82,062)</td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized and realized gain on effective hedges, net of tax (benefit) of ($2,822)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>18,611</td><td></td><td>18,611</td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>211,711</td></tr><tr><td>Settlement of awards under stock plans</td><td></td><td></td><td>1,063,206</td><td>1,063</td><td>23,394</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>24,457</td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefits from awards under stock plans</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11,943</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11,943</td></tr><tr><td>Stock-based compensation expense</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>40,938</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>40,938</td></tr><tr><td>Cash dividends</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(10,874)</td><td></td><td></td><td>(10,874)</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of 80,638 treasury shares</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(5,270)</td><td>(5,270)</td></tr><tr><td>January 29, 2012</td><td></td><td>188,595</td><td>68,297,773</td><td>68,298</td><td>1,377,922</td><td>1,022,818</td><td>73,835</td><td>(16,019)</td><td>2,715,449</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>433,840</td><td></td><td></td><td>433,840</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit related to pension and postretirement plans, net of tax (benefit) of ($(338)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(542)</td><td></td><td>(542)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax expense of $469</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>86,492</td><td></td><td>86,492</td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized and realized (loss) on effective hedges, net of tax expense of $2,681</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(19,903)</td><td></td><td>(19,903)</td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>499,887</td></tr><tr><td>Settlement of awards under stock plans</td><td></td><td></td><td>837,360</td><td>837</td><td>12,434</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13,271</td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefits from awards under stock plans</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15,332</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15,332</td></tr><tr><td>Stock-based compensation expense</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>33,599</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>33,599</td></tr><tr><td>Conversion of convertible preferred stock</td><td></td><td>(188,595)</td><td>4,189,358</td><td>4,189</td><td>184,406</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Cash dividends</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(10,985)</td><td></td><td></td><td>(10,985)</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of 164,065 treasury shares</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(13,984)</td><td>(13,984)</td></tr><tr><td>February 3, 2013</td><td></td><td>—</td><td>73,324,491</td><td>73,324</td><td>1,623,693</td><td>1,445,673</td><td>139,882</td><td>(30,003)</td><td>3,252,569</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>143,537</td><td></td><td></td><td>143,537</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service credit related to pension and postretirement plans, net of tax (benefit) of ($(338)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(541)</td><td></td><td>(541)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (benefit) of ($66)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(103,529)</td><td></td><td>(103,529)</td></tr><tr><td>Net unrealized and realized gain on effective hedges, net of tax (benefit) of ($(260)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>6,510</td><td></td><td>6,510</td></tr><tr><td>Total comprehensive income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>45,977</td></tr><tr><td>Issuance of common stock in connection with the acquisition of Warnaco, including 415,872 treasury shares</td><td></td><td></td><td>7,257,537</td><td>7,258</td><td>888,925</td><td></td><td></td><td>30,269</td><td>926,452</td></tr><tr><td>Warnaco employee replacement stock awards included in acquisition consideration</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>39,752</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>39,752</td></tr><tr><td>Settlement of awards under stock plans</td><td></td><td></td><td>2,097,546</td><td>2,098</td><td>49,473</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>51,571</td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefits from awards under stock plans</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>36,781</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>36,781</td></tr><tr><td>Stock-based compensation expense</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>57,954</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>57,954</td></tr><tr><td>Cash dividends</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(12,293)</td><td></td><td></td><td>(12,293)</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of 514,978 treasury shares</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(61,435)</td><td>(61,435)</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition date fair value of redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>$ 5,600</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>(55)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>(2,094)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Adjustment to initial fair value of redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>2,149</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>(2,149)</td><td></td><td></td><td>(2,149)</td></tr><tr><td>February 2, 2014</td><td>$ 5,600</td><td>$ 82,679,574</td><td>$ 82,680</td><td>$ 2,696,578</td><td>$1,574,768</td><td>$ 42,322</td><td>$ (61,169)</td><td>$ 4,335,179</td><td></td></tr></table>

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business — PVH Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) constitute a global apparel company whose brand portfolio consists of nationally and internationally recognized brand names, including Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner’s, Olga and Eagle, which are owned, and Speedo, Geoffrey Beene, Kenneth Cole New York, Kenneth Cole Reaction, Sean John, MICHAEL Michael Kors, Michael Kors Collection, Chaps, Donald J. Trump Signature Collection, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Nautica, Ted Baker, J. Garcia, Claiborne, Robert Graham, U.S. POLO ASSN., Ike Behar, Access, Jones New York and John Varvatos, which are licensed, as well as various other licensed and private label brands. In addition, through the end of the third quarter of 2013, the Company owned, and operated businesses under, the G.H. Bass & Co. and Bass trademarks. The Company designs and markets branded dress shirts, neckwear, sportswear, jeanswear, intimate apparel, swim products and, to a lesser extent, handbags, footwear and other related products and licenses its owned brands over a broad range of products.

Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in entities that the Company does not control but has the ability to exercise significant influence over are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The Company’s Consolidated Income Statements include its proportionate share of the net income or loss of these entities. Please see Note 5, “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” for a further discussion. As a result of the acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. (“Warnaco”), the Company owns a majority interest in a joint venture in India that, as of February 2, 2014, was consolidated and accounted for as a redeemable non-controlling interest. Please see Note 6, “Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest,” for a further discussion. The redeemable non-controlling interest represents the minority shareholders’ proportionate share (49%) of the equity in that entity.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates.

Fiscal Year — The Company uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to February 1. References to a year are to the Company’s fiscal year, unless the context requires otherwise. Results for 2013, 2012 and 2011 represent the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2014, 53 weeks ended February 3, 2013 and 52 weeks ended January 29, 2012, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company’s balances of cash and cash equivalents at February 2, 2014 consisted principally of bank deposits and investments in money market funds.

Accounts Receivable — Accounts receivable, as presented on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, is net of allowances. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable and assessments of collectibility based on historic trends, the financial condition of the Company’s customers and an evaluation of economic conditions. The Company writes off uncollectible trade receivables once collection efforts have been exhausted and third parties confirm the balance is not recoverable. Costs associated with allowable customer markdowns and operational chargebacks, net of the expected recoveries, are part of the provision for allowances included in accounts receivable. These provisions result from seasonal negotiations, as well as historic deduction trends net of expected recoveries, and the evaluation of current market conditions.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets — The Company assesses the recoverability of goodwill annually, at the beginning of the third quarter of each fiscal year, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that fair value of the reporting unit may have been reduced below its carrying amount. Impairment testing for goodwill is done at a reporting unit level. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets, a reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment, called a component. However, two or more components of an operating segment will be aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. In 2012, the Company adopted new authoritative accounting guidance that allows it to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the more detailed two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company performs the quantitative test if its qualitative assessment determined it is



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. The Company may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative test for any reporting unit. When performing the quantitative test, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill is determined to exceed the implied fair value of that goodwill. The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is calculated using a discounted cash flow model.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually, at the beginning of the third quarter of each fiscal year, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. In 2012, the Company also adopted new authoritative accounting guidance that allows it to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a more detailed quantitative impairment test for its indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company performs the quantitative test if its qualitative assessment determined it was more likely than not that the assets are impaired. The Company may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative test. When performing the quantitative test, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, which is determined using the estimated discounted cash flows associated with the asset’s use. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested for impairment along with other long-lived assets as described below.

The Company performed its required annual impairment tests for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets at the beginning of the third quarters of 2013, 2012 and 2011. No impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets resulted from any of these tests.

Asset Impairments — The Company reviews for and records impairment losses on long-lived assets (excluding goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets) in accordance with FASB guidance for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The Company records impairment losses when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the related assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets. Please see Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements” for a further discussion.

Inventories — Inventories are comprised principally of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost for principally all wholesale apparel inventories in North America and certain wholesale and retail apparel inventories in Asia and Latin America is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Cost for all other inventories is determined using the weighted average cost method. The Company reviews current business trends, inventory agings and discontinued merchandise categories to determine adjustments, which it estimates will be needed to liquidate existing clearance inventories and reduce inventories to the lower of cost or market.

Inventory held on consignment by third parties totaled $9,722 at February 2, 2014 and $9,417 at February 3, 2013.

Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is generally provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets on a straight-line basis. The range of useful lives is principally as follows: Buildings and building improvements: 15-40 years; machinery, software and equipment: 2-10 years; furniture and fixtures: 2-10 years; and fixtures located in third party customer locations (“shop-in-shops”) and their related costs: 3-5 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the related lease or the estimated useful life of the asset. In certain circumstances, contractual renewal options are considered when determining the term of the related lease. Major additions and betterments are capitalized, and repairs and maintenance are charged to operations in the period incurred. Depreciation expense totaled $189,675, $122,424 and $112,495 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Leases — The Company leases retail locations, warehouses, showrooms, office space and equipment. Assets held under capital leases are included in property, plant and equipment and are amortized over the lesser of the term of the related lease or the estimated useful life of the asset. The Company accounts for rent expense under non-cancelable operating leases with scheduled rent increases and rent holidays on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company determines the lease term at the inception of a lease by assuming the exercise of those renewal options that are reasonably assured because of the significant economic penalty that exists for not exercising those options. The excess of straight-line rent expense over scheduled payments is recorded as a deferred liability. In addition, the Company receives build out contributions from landlords primarily as an incentive for the Company to lease retail store space from the landlords. Such amounts are amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the life of the related lease.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Revenue Recognition — Revenue from the Company’s wholesale operations is recognized at the time title to the goods passes and the risk of loss is transferred to customers. For sales by the Company’s retail stores, revenue is recognized when goods are sold to consumers. Allowances for estimated returns and discounts are provided when sales are recorded. Royalty revenue for licensees whose sales exceed contractual sales minimums, including licensee contributions toward advertising, is recognized when licensed products are sold as reported by the Company’s licensees. For licensees whose sales do not exceed contractual sales minimums, royalty revenue is recognized ratably based on contractual requirements for the timing of minimum payments.

The Company sells gift cards to customers in its retail stores. The Company does not charge administrative fees on gift cards, nor do they expire. Upon the purchase of a gift card by a customer, a liability is established for the cash value of the gift card. The liability is relieved and revenue is recognized when the gift card is redeemed by the customer or if the Company determines that the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed is remote (also known as “gift card breakage”) and that it does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of such unredeemed gift card to any jurisdiction. Gift card breakage was immaterial in each of the last three years.

Sales Incentives — The Company uses certain sales incentive programs related to certain of the Company’s retail operations, such as customer loyalty programs and the issuance of coupons. The Company’s loyalty programs are structured such that customers receive gift cards for future use after specified levels of spending are achieved within a specified time period. Costs associated with the Company’s loyalty programs are recorded ratably as a cost of goods sold based on enrolled customers’ spending. Costs associated with coupons are recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time of coupon redemption.

Cost of Goods Sold and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses — Costs associated with the production and procurement of product are included in cost of goods sold, including inbound freight costs, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs and other product procurement related charges. All other expenses, excluding interest and income taxes, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses, including warehousing and distribution expenses, as the predominant expenses associated therewith are general and administrative in nature, including rent, utilities and payroll.

Shipping and Handling Fees — Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales.

Advertising — Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Costs associated with cooperative advertising programs, under which the Company shares the cost of a customer’s advertising expenditures, are treated as a reduction of revenue. Advertising expenses totaled $392,472, $350,615 and $370,153 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Prepaid advertising expenses recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets totaled $4,670 and $3,126 at February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, respectively.

Sales Taxes — The Company accounts for sales taxes and other related taxes on a net basis, excluding such taxes from revenue.

Income Taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts more likely than not to be realized.

Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amount of deductible and taxable items, evaluating tax positions and in determining the income tax provision. The Company recognizes income tax benefits only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be fully sustained upon review by taxing authorities, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. If the recognition threshold is met, the Company measures the tax benefit at the largest amount with a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. For tax positions that are 50 percent or less likely of being sustained upon audit, the Company does not recognize any portion of that benefit in the financial statements. When the outcome of these tax matters changes, the change in estimate impacts the provision for income taxes in the period that such a determination is made. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the Company’s income tax provision.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions — The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in United States dollars. If the functional currency of a foreign subsidiary is not the United States dollar, assets and liabilities are translated to United States dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the applicable balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated to United States dollars at the average exchange rate for the applicable period. Any adjustments resulting from such translation are recorded in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"). Gains and losses on the translation of intercompany loans made between foreign subsidiaries that are of a long-term investment nature are also included in AOCI. Transaction gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of a particular entity are principally included in selling, general and administrative expenses and totaled a loss of $4,586, $1,911 and $5,729 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Financial Instruments — The Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to certain anticipated cash flows associated with certain international inventory purchases. In addition, the Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on certain intercompany loans. To help manage these exposures, the Company uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The Company also has exposure to interest rate volatility related to its senior secured term loan facilities. The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against this exposure. The Company had also entered into an interest rate cap agreement, which expired on September 6, 2012. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company records the foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate contracts at fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheets, and does not net the related assets and liabilities. The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts is measured as the total amount of currency to be purchased, multiplied by the difference between (i) the forward rate as of the period end and (ii) the settlement rate specified in each contract. The fair values of the interest rate contracts are based on observable interest rate yield curves and represent the expected discounted cash flows underlying the financial instruments. Changes in fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts associated with certain international inventory purchases and the interest rate contracts (collectively referred to as “cash flow hedges”) that are designated as effective hedging instruments are recorded in equity as a component of AOCI. Any ineffectiveness in such cash flow hedges is immediately recognized in earnings. The Company records immediately in earnings changes in the fair value of hedges that are not designated as effective hedging instruments, including all of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts related to intercompany loans, which are not of a long-term investment nature. Any gains and losses that are immediately recognized in earnings on such contracts related to intercompany loans are largely offset by the remeasurement of the underlying intercompany loan balances. Cash flows from the Company’s derivative instruments are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the same category as the items being hedged.

Balance Sheet Classification of Early Settlements of Long-Term Obligations — The Company classifies obligations settled after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements based on the contractual payment terms of the underlying agreements.

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — Employee pension benefits earned during the year, as well as interest on the projected benefit obligations or accumulated benefit obligations, are accrued quarterly. Prior service costs and credits resulting from changes in plan benefits are generally amortized over the average remaining service period of the employees expected to receive benefits. The expected return on plan assets is recognized quarterly and determined by applying the assumed return on assets to the actual fair value of plan assets adjusted for expected benefit payments, contributions and plan expenses. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the Company’s operating results in the year in which they occur. These gains and losses are measured at least annually at the end of the Company’s fiscal year and, as such, are generally recorded during the fourth quarter of each year. Please see Note 11, “Retirement and Benefit Plans” for a further discussion of the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans.

Stock-Based Compensation — The Company recognizes all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their grant date fair values. Please see Note 13, “Stock-Based Compensation” for a further discussion.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards — The FASB issued in February 2013 guidance that requires an entity to provide information about significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI. For amounts that are required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity must report the amounts by component and their corresponding effect on the respective line items of net income. Such information is required to be presented either on the face of the financial



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

statements or as a separate disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified to net income in their entirety, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures. This guidance became effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2013. The adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

The FASB issued in March 2013 guidance that requires an entity to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income when it ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is a foreign entity if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity. For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment related to the investment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such investment. This guidance becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2014. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

The FASB issued in July 2013 guidance that requires an entity to present an uncertain tax positions, or a portion of an uncertain tax position, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward. However, to the extent (i) a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or (ii) the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the uncertain tax position should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. This guidance becomes effective prospectively for the Company in the first quarter of 2014. The adoption is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Reclassifications — Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the prior year periods to present that information on a basis consistent with the current year. Please see Note 4, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and Note 19, “Segment Data,” for discussions of changes in reporting related to these areas.

## 2. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

## Acquisition of Warnaco

The Company acquired on February 13, 2013 all of the outstanding equity interests in Warnaco. The results of Warnaco’s operations since that date are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Warnaco designs, sources, markets and distributes a broad line of intimate apparel, underwear, jeanswear and swim products worldwide. Warnaco’s products are sold under the Calvin Klein, Speedo, Warner’s and Olga brand names and were also previously sold under the Chaps brand name. Ralph Lauren Corporation reacquired the Chaps license effective contemporaneously with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco.

The Warnaco acquisition provided the Company with complete direct global control of the Calvin Klein brand image and commercial decisions for the two largest Calvin Klein apparel categories — jeanswear and underwear. In addition, the Company believes the acquisition takes advantage of its and Warnaco’s complementary geographic platforms. Warnaco’s operations in Asia and Latin America should enhance the Company’s opportunities in those high-growth regions, and the Company has the ability to leverage its expertise and infrastructure in North America and Europe to enhance the growth and profitability of the Calvin Klein Jeans and Calvin Klein Underwear businesses in those regions.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## Fair Value of the Acquisition Consideration

The acquisition date fair value of the acquisition consideration paid at closing totaled $3,137,056, which consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$ 2,179,980</td></tr><tr><td>Common stock (7,674 shares, par value $1.00 per share)</td><td>926,452</td></tr><tr><td>Warnaco employee replacement stock awards</td><td>39,752</td></tr><tr><td>Elimination of pre-acquisition liability to Warnaco</td><td>(9,128)</td></tr><tr><td>Total fair value of the acquisition consideration</td><td>$ 3,137,056</td></tr></table>

The fair value of the 7,674 common shares issued was equal to the aggregate value of the shares at the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on February 12, 2013, the day prior to the closing. The value of the replacement stock awards was determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the Warnaco awards outstanding at the time of the acquisition, reduced by an estimated value of awards to be forfeited, by the proportionate amount of the vesting period that had lapsed as of the acquisition date. Also included in the acquisition consideration was the elimination of a $9,128 pre-acquisition liability to Warnaco.

The Company funded the cash portion and related costs of the Warnaco acquisition, repaid all outstanding borrowings under its previously outstanding senior secured credit facilities and repaid all of Warnaco’s previously outstanding long-term debt with the net proceeds of (i) the issuance of $700,000 of 4 1/2% senior notes due 2022; and (ii) the borrowing of $3,075,000 of term loans under new senior secured credit facilities.

Please see Note 4, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” Note 7, “Debt,” Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity,” and Note 13, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for a further discussion of these aspects of the acquisition.

The Company incurred certain pre-tax costs directly associated with the acquisition, including short-lived non-cash valuation adjustments and amortization, totaling approximately $170,000, of which approximately $43,000 was recorded in 2012 and approximately $127,000 was recorded during 2013. Please see Note 16, “Activity Exit Costs,” for a discussion of restructuring costs incurred during 2013 associated with the acquisition.

The operations acquired with Warnaco had total revenue of $2,085,135 and a net loss, after non-cash valuation adjustments and amortization and integration costs, of $(45,254) for the period from the date of acquisition through February 2, 2014. These amounts are included in the Company’s results of operations for the year then ended.

## Pro Forma Impact of the Transaction

The following table presents the Company’s pro forma consolidated results of operations for the year ended February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, as if the acquisition and the related financing transactions had occurred on January 30, 2012 (the first day of its fiscal year ended February 3, 2013) instead of on February 13, 2013. The pro forma results were calculated applying the Company’s accounting policies and reflect (i) the impact on revenue, cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses resulting from the elimination of intercompany transactions; (ii) the impact on depreciation and amortization expense based on fair value adjustments to Warnaco’s property, plant and equipment and intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition; (iii) the impact on interest expense resulting from changes to the Company’s capital structure in connection with the acquisition; (iv) the impact on cost of goods sold resulting from acquisition date adjustments to the fair value of inventory; (v) the elimination of transaction costs related to the acquisition that were included in the Company’s results of operations for the years ended February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013; and (vi) the tax effects of the above adjustments. The pro forma results do not include any realized or anticipated cost synergies or other effects of the integration of Warnaco. Accordingly, such pro forma amounts are not indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the acquisition been completed on January 30, 2012, nor are they indicative of the future operating results of the combined company.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pro Forma Year Ended</td></tr><tr><td>2/2/14</td><td>2/3/13</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>$ 8,249,381</td><td>$ 8,056,422</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>441,694</td><td>379,439</td></tr></table>

## Allocation of the Acquisition Consideration

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities and redeemable non-controlling interest assumed at the date of acquisition:

<table><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$</td><td>364,651</td></tr><tr><td>Trade receivables</td><td></td><td>286,720</td></tr><tr><td>Other receivables</td><td></td><td>46,859</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td></td><td>442,926</td></tr><tr><td>Prepaid expenses</td><td></td><td>38,743</td></tr><tr><td>Other current assets</td><td></td><td>56,040</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment</td><td></td><td>123,257</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill</td><td></td><td>1,513,172</td></tr><tr><td>Tradenames</td><td></td><td>604,600</td></tr><tr><td>Other intangibles</td><td></td><td>1,023,700</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets</td><td></td><td>169,332</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets acquired</td><td></td><td>4,670,000</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts payable</td><td></td><td>180,059</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses</td><td></td><td>260,482</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings</td><td></td><td>26,927</td></tr><tr><td>Current portion of long-term debt</td><td></td><td>2,000</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td></td><td>195,000</td></tr><tr><td>Other liabilities</td><td></td><td>862,876</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities assumed</td><td></td><td>1,527,344</td></tr><tr><td>Redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td></td><td>5,600</td></tr><tr><td>Total fair value of acquisition consideration</td><td>$</td><td>3,137,056</td></tr></table>

The Company finalized the purchase price allocation during the fourth quarter of 2013.

During the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company received additional information about facts and circumstances that existed as of the Warnaco acquisition date. As a result of the receipt of new information, which was included in the final valuation report received from a third-party valuation firm, and considering the results of that report, the Company estimated the fair value of the order backlog acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition to be $24,100 lower than the estimated provisional amount. As a result of this adjustment to fair value, the carrying amount of the order backlog (which was being amortized principally over six months) was retrospectively decreased as of February 13, 2013, with a corresponding increase to goodwill and other intangible assets (net of related deferred taxes), and the related order backlog amortization expense for the first and second quarters of 2013 was reduced. The Company recorded these measurement period adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2013 and applied the adjustments retrospectively in accordance with FASB guidance for business combinations. The measurement period adjustments were included in the results of the Calvin Klein International segment. Please see the section entitled “Selected Quarterly Financial Data - Unaudited” on pages F-57 and F-58 for the impacts of these adjustments on first and second quarter 2013 net income and earnings per share.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $1,513,172, which was assigned to the Company’s Calvin Klein North America, Calvin Klein International, Tommy Hilfiger North America, Tommy Hilfiger International, Heritage Brands Wholesale and Heritage Brands Retail segments in the amounts of $456,032, $658,575, $5,900, $296,500, $84,265, and $11,900 respectively. In accordance with FASB guidance, the goodwill acquired in the Warnaco acquisition was assigned as of the acquisition date to the Company’s reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. For those reporting units that had not been assigned any of the assets acquired or liabilities assumed in the acquisition, the amount of goodwill assigned was determined by calculating the estimated fair value of such reporting units before the acquisition and their estimated fair values after the acquisition. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The Company also recorded other intangible assets of $1,628,300, which included reacquired license rights of $593,300, order backlog of $73,000 and customer relationships of $149,800, which are all amortizable, as well as tradenames of $604,600 and perpetual license rights of $207,600, which have indefinite lives.

## Sale of Chaps Sportswear Assets

Contemporaneously with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco, Ralph Lauren Corporation reacquired the Chaps license. The Chaps sportswear business was previously operated by Warnaco under such license. In connection with this transaction, the Company sold all of the assets of the Chaps sportswear business, which consisted principally of inventory, to Ralph Lauren Corporation for gross proceeds of $18,278.

## Sale of Bass Business

On November 4, 2013, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its G.H. Bass & Co. (“Bass”) business. The decision to sell these assets was based on the Company’s strategy to drive growth through its higher-margin Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses.

The Company completed the sale of these assets for gross proceeds of $49,236 and recorded a loss of $15,997, which represents the excess of the carrying value of the assets over the proceeds received, plus costs to sell. This loss is principally included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements for the year ended February 2, 2014.

A small number of the Company’s Bass stores were excluded from the sale and were deemed to be impaired as of the end of the third quarter of 2013. The Company recorded a loss of $1,161 related to the impaired stores. Please see Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a further discussion. In addition, the Company recorded a gain of $3,255 as a result of writing off certain liabilities in connection with the transaction. The Company also recognized costs related to severance and termination benefits for certain Bass employees, which totaled $1,952. The above-mentioned items are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements for the year ended February 2, 2014 and are included in the Heritage Brands Retail segment.

In connection with the sale, the Company guaranteed lease payments for substantially all Bass retail stores included in the sale. The estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations at the time of the sale was $4,373, which was recorded in the Heritage Brands Retail segment and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements for the year ended February 2, 2014 and accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 2, 2014. Please see Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” and Note 20, “Guarantees,” for a further discussion.

In connection with the items outlined above, the Company recorded a net pre-tax loss of $20,228 during 2013.



# PVH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## Acquisition of Russia Franchisee

During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company acquired three Tommy Hilfiger stores in Russia from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee. The Company paid $6,033 as consideration for this transaction. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination.

## Acquisition of Netherlands Franchisee

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company acquired from a former Tommy Hilfiger franchisee in the Netherlands 100% of the share capital of ten affiliated companies, which operate 13 Tommy Hilfiger stores in the Netherlands. The Company paid $13,104 as consideration for this transaction, which was accounted for as a business combination.

## Reacquisition of Tommy Hilfiger Tailored Apparel License

During 2011, the Company entered into agreements to reacquire from a licensee, prior to the expiration of the license, the rights to distribute Tommy Hilfiger brand tailored apparel in Europe and acquire an outlet store from the licensee. The transfer of the rights and store ownership was effective December 31, 2012. Under these agreements, the Company made a payment of $9,641 to the licensee during the fourth quarter of 2011 and an additional payment of $24,752 to the licensee during the fourth quarter of 2012. This reacquisition was accounted for as a business combination.

## Reacquisition of Perpetually Licensed Rights for Tommy Hilfiger in India

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company reacquired the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks that had been subject to a perpetual license previously granted to GVM International Limited (“GVM”). The transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The Company paid $25,000 as consideration for this transaction. In addition, the Company is required to make annual contingent purchase price payments into 2016 (or, under certain circumstances, into 2017) based on a percentage of annual sales in excess of an agreed upon threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India following the acquisition date. Such payments are subject to a $25,000 aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. The Company made contingent annual purchase price payments of $429 and $185 during 2013 and 2012, respectively. The estimated fair value of future payments as of February 2, 2014 is $4,237. Please see Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a further discussion.

In connection with the transaction, the Company recorded an expense of $20,709 during the third quarter of 2011 due to the settlement of an unfavorable contract as a result of a pre-existing relationship with the licensee, as the license provided favorable terms to the licensee. Such expense was included within selling, general and administrative expenses.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment, at cost, was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Land</td><td>$ 2,706</td><td>$ 1,057</td></tr><tr><td>Buildings and building improvements</td><td>108,289</td><td>73,003</td></tr><tr><td>Machinery, software and equipment</td><td>388,043</td><td>297,714</td></tr><tr><td>Furniture and fixtures</td><td>291,051</td><td>271,690</td></tr><tr><td>Shop-in-shops</td><td>123,530</td><td>101,338</td></tr><tr><td>Leasehold improvements</td><td>512,739</td><td>437,023</td></tr><tr><td>Construction in progress</td><td>8,490</td><td>2,873</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, gross</td><td>1,434,848</td><td>1,184,698</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Accumulated depreciation</td><td>(722,770)</td><td>(623,363)</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment, net</td><td>$ 712,078</td><td>$ 561,335</td></tr></table>

Construction in progress at February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013 represents costs incurred for machinery, software and equipment, furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements not yet placed in use, principally related to the construction of retail stores. Interest costs capitalized in construction in progress were immaterial during 2013, 2012 and 2011.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Calvin Klein North America</td><td>Calvin Klein International</td><td>Tommy Hilfiger North America</td><td>Tommy Hilfiger International</td><td>Heritage Brands Wholesale</td><td>Heritage Brands Retail</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of January 29, 2012</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill, gross</td><td>$181,578</td><td>$ 174,457</td><td>$198,501</td><td>$ 1,112,797</td><td>$ 155,142</td><td>$ —</td><td>$1,822,475</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated impairment losses</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill, net</td><td>181,578</td><td>174,457</td><td>198,501</td><td>1,112,797</td><td>155,142</td><td>—</td><td>1,822,475</td></tr><tr><td>Contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein</td><td>25,505</td><td>26,210</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>51,715</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill from acquisition of Netherlands franchisee</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>11,036</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>11,036</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill from reacquisition of Tommy Hilfiger tailored apparel license</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>23,735</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>23,735</td></tr><tr><td>Currency translation</td><td>—</td><td>875</td><td>—</td><td>49,051</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>49,926</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of February 3, 2013</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill, gross</td><td>207,083</td><td>201,542</td><td>198,501</td><td>1,196,619</td><td>155,142</td><td>—</td><td>1,958,887</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated impairment losses</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill, net</td><td>207,083</td><td>201,542</td><td>198,501</td><td>1,196,619</td><td>155,142</td><td>—</td><td>1,958,887</td></tr><tr><td>Contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein</td><td>25,158</td><td>25,853</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>51,011</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill from acquisition of Russian franchisee</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5,033</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5,033</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill from acquisition of Warnaco</td><td>456,032</td><td>658,575</td><td>5,900</td><td>296,500</td><td>84,265</td><td>11,900</td><td>1,513,172</td></tr><tr><td>Currency translation</td><td>(4,624)</td><td>(8,213)</td><td>—</td><td>(8,276)</td><td>(219)</td><td>—</td><td>(21,332)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance as of February 2, 2014</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill, gross</td><td>683,649</td><td>877,757</td><td>204,401</td><td>1,489,876</td><td>239,188</td><td>11,900</td><td>3,506,771</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated impairment losses</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill, net</td><td>$683,649</td><td>$ 877,757</td><td>$204,401</td><td>$ 1,489,876</td><td>$ 239,188</td><td>$ 11,900</td><td>$3,506,771</td></tr></table>

In accordance with FASB guidance, the goodwill acquired in the Warnaco acquisition was assigned as of the acquisition date to the Company’s reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. For those reporting units that had not been assigned any of the assets acquired or liabilities assumed in the acquisition, the amount of goodwill assigned was determined by calculating the estimated fair value of such reporting units before the acquisition and their estimated fair values after the acquisition.

The Company is required to make contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein in connection with the Company’s acquisition in 2003 of all of the issued and outstanding stock of Calvin Klein, Inc. and certain affiliated companies (collectively, “Calvin Klein”). Such payments are based on 1.15% of total worldwide net sales, as defined in the acquisition agreement (as amended), of products bearing any of the Calvin Klein brands and are required to be made with respect to sales made through February 12, 2018. A significant portion of the sales on which the payments to Mr. Klein are made are wholesale sales by the Company and its licensees and other partners to retailers.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company’s intangible assets consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">February 2, 2014</td><td colspan="3">February 3, 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Gross Carrying Amount</td><td>Accumulated Amortization</td><td>Net</td><td>Gross Carrying Amount</td><td>Accumulated Amortization</td><td>Net</td></tr><tr><td>Intangible assets subject to amortization:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Customer relationships \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>$ 335,688</td><td>$ (68,260)</td><td>$ 267,428</td><td>$ 190,383</td><td>$ (41,158)</td><td>$ 149,225</td></tr><tr><td>Covenants not to compete</td><td>2,220</td><td>(2,220)</td><td>—</td><td>2,220</td><td>(2,220)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Order backlog \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>104,392</td><td>(104,392)</td><td>—</td><td>32,287</td><td>(32,287)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Reacquired license rights \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>578,634</td><td>(23,016)</td><td>555,618</td><td>8,565</td><td>(3,636)</td><td>4,929</td></tr><tr><td>Total intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>1,020,934</td><td>(197,888)</td><td>823,046</td><td>233,455</td><td>(79,301)</td><td>154,154</td></tr><tr><td>Indefinite-lived intangible assets:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tradenames \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>3,010,274</td><td>—</td><td>3,010,274</td><td>2,413,809</td><td>—</td><td>2,413,809</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual license rights \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>205,953</td><td>—</td><td>205,953</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Reacquired perpetual license rights</td><td>12,916</td><td>—</td><td>12,916</td><td>13,042</td><td>—</td><td>13,042</td></tr><tr><td>Total indefinite-lived intangible assets</td><td>3,229,143</td><td>—</td><td>3,229,143</td><td>2,426,851</td><td>—</td><td>2,426,851</td></tr><tr><td>Total intangible assets</td><td>$ 4,250,077</td><td>$ (197,888)</td><td>$ 4,052,189</td><td>$ 2,660,306</td><td>$ (79,301)</td><td>$ 2,581,005</td></tr></table>

(1) Change from February 3, 2013 to February 2, 2014 primarily relates to intangible assets recorded in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. The acquired customer relationships are amortized principally over 10 years, order backlog was amortized principally over 6 months and reacquired license rights are amortized principally over 33 years from the date of the acquisition. As of February 2, 2014, the weighted average life of the amortizable intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition of Warnaco was 27.8 years.

Amortization expense related to the Company’s amortizable intangible assets was $118,587 and $12,902 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Assuming constant exchange rates and no change in the gross carrying amount of the intangible assets, amortization expense for the next five years related to the Company’s intangible assets as of February 2, 2014 is expected to be as follows:

<table><tr><td>Fiscal Year</td><td>Amount</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>$ 45,358</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>45,009</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>45,009</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>45,009</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>45,009</td></tr></table>



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 5. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

## Australia

The Company formed a joint venture, PVH Brands Australia Pty. Limited (“PVH Australia”) in 2013, in which the Company owns a 50% economic interest. The joint venture licenses from a subsidiary of the Company the rights to distribute and sell certain Calvin Klein brand products in Australia, New Zealand and other island nations in the South Pacific. As part of the joint venture agreement, the Company contributed to the joint venture its subsidiaries that were operating the Calvin Klein jeans businesses in Australia and New Zealand. Upon completion of this contribution, which took place on the first day of fiscal year 2014, the Company deconsolidated these subsidiaries. The Company made a payment of $708 to PVH Australia during 2013 to contribute its 50% share of the initial funding. The Company will account for its investment in this joint venture under the equity method of accounting. Subsequent to February 2, 2014, the Company made an additional payment of $9,669 to PVH Australia to contribute its 50% share of funding. Such amount was placed into an escrow account prior to the end of 2013 and is classified as restricted cash, which is included in other current assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2014.

## Brazil

The Company formed a joint venture, Tommy Hilfiger do Brasil S.A., in Brazil in 2012, in which the Company owns a 40% economic interest. The joint venture holds an exclusive license for the Tommy Hilfiger brand in Brazil that became effective on January 4, 2013. The Company made payments of $2,760 and $6,464, to Tommy Hilfiger do Brasil S.A. during 2013 and 2012, respectively, to contribute its 40% share of the joint venture funding. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

## China

The Company formed a joint venture, TH Asia Ltd., in China in 2010, in which the Company owns a 45% economic interest. The joint venture assumed direct control of the Tommy Hilfiger wholesale and retail distribution business in China from the prior licensee on August 1, 2011. The Company made payments totaling $17,100 to TH Asia Ltd. during 2011 to contribute its 45% share of funding. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

## India

The Company acquired in 2011 for $30,000 a 50% economic interest in a company that has since been renamed Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Private Limited (“TH India”). TH India is the direct licensee of the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India for all categories (other than fragrance), operates a wholesale apparel, footwear and handbags business in connection with its license, and sublicenses the trademarks for certain other product categories. The Company made additional payments totaling $1,900 and $1,600 to TH India during 2012 and 2011, respectively, to contribute its 50% share of the joint venture funding. This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Included in other assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013 is $71,331 and $62,021, respectively, related to these investments in unconsolidated affiliates.

## 6. REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

As a result of the acquisition of Warnaco, the Company owns a 51% interest in a joint venture in India, Premium Garments Wholesale Trading Private Limited (“CK India”), that, as of February 2, 2014, was consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.

The Shareholders Agreement entered into by the parties to the joint venture (the “Shareholders Agreement”) contains a put option under which the non-controlling shareholders can require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their shares in the joint venture (i) at any date with respect to one of the non-controlling shareholders, who holds a 24% interest; and (ii) after July 8, 2015, or at any date if the Company commits a material breach, as defined in the Shareholders Agreement, that is not cured, or becomes insolvent, with respect to the other non-controlling shareholder, who holds a 25% interest. The put price is



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

the fair market value of the shares on the redemption date based upon a multiple of the joint venture’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the prior 12 months, less the joint venture’s net debt and any amounts owed to the Company by the non-controlling shareholders.

The Shareholders Agreement also contains a call option, under which the Company can require any of the non-controlling shareholders to sell their shares to the Company (i) at any date in the event that any non-controlling shareholder commits a material breach, as defined in the Shareholders Agreement, under any of the agreements related to the joint venture, that is not cured; or (ii) at any date after July 8, 2015. The call price is determined by the same method as the put price (as described above). During the second quarter of 2013, the Company gave notice to the non-controlling shareholders that it was exercising the call option due to a continuing material breach by the non-controlling shareholders. As of February 2, 2014, the sale of the non-controlling interests had not yet been consummated.

The fair value of the non-controlling interest as of the date of the Warnaco acquisition was $5,600. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the redeemable non-controlling interest are recognized immediately as they occur, since a portion of the non-controlling interest is currently redeemable and it is probable that the other portion will become redeemable in the future based on the passage of time. The carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest is adjusted to equal the fair value at the end of each reporting period, provided that this amount at the end of each reporting period cannot be lower than the initial fair value. Any fair value adjustment to the carrying amount is determined after attribution of net income and other comprehensive income of the non-controlling interest. After initial measurement, the attribution of any net losses of the non-controlling interest cannot exceed the amount of any increase in fair value above the initial fair value. Any fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest will be recognized immediately in retained earnings of the Company. After adjusting the carrying amount for the net loss and other comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interest during 2013, an adjustment to the Company’s retained earnings of $2,149 was necessary to increase the fair value of the redeemable non-controlling interest, as of February 2, 2014, to the initial fair value of $5,600.

## 7. DEBT

## Short-Term Borrowings

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries has a Yen-denominated overdraft facility with a Japanese bank, which provides for borrowings of up to ¥1,000,000 (approximately $10,000 based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and is utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and bear interest at the one-month Japanese interbank borrowing rate (“TIBOR”) plus 0.30%. Such facility renews automatically unless the Company gives notice of termination. As of February 2, 2014, the Company had $4,892 of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at February 2, 2014 was 0.37%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under this facility during 2013 was approximately $10,000.

One of the Company’s European subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has short-term revolving notes with a number of banks at various interest rates, as well as a Euro-denominated overdraft facility, which are used to fund working capital needs. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of February 2, 2014. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under these facilities during 2013 was approximately $25,300.

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has Rupee-denominated short-term revolving credit facilities with a local lender. These facilities provide for total borrowings of up to Rs195,000 (approximately $3,100 based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and are utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at various interest rates, primarily based on a base rate set by the lending bank. As of February 2, 2014, the Company had $1,904 of borrowings outstanding under these facilities and the weighted average interest rate on the funds borrowed at February 2, 2014 was 6.97%. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under these facilities during 2013 was approximately $2,700.

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has a short-term $10,000 revolving credit facility to be used to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 1.75% plus the one-month London interbank borrowing rate (“LIBOR”). At the end of each month, amounts outstanding under this facility may be carried forward for additional one-month periods for up to one year. This facility was renewed in December 2013 and may be renewed



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

annually in the future. This facility is subject to certain terms and conditions and may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the lender. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

One of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has a Won-denominated short-term revolving credit facility with one lender that provides for borrowings of up to ¥3,000,000 (approximately $2,800 based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and is utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the three-month Cost of Funds Index rate plus a specified margin. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

One of the Company’s Latin American subsidiaries acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition has Real-denominated short-term revolving credit facilities with a number of banks that provide for total available borrowings of R$69,000 (approximately $28,400 based on exchange rates in effect on February 2, 2014) and are utilized to fund working capital needs. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at various interest rates. There were no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

In addition, the Company has certain other facilities, under which there were no borrowings outstanding as of or during the year ended February 2, 2014.

## Long-Term Debt

The carrying amounts of the Company’s long-term debt were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Senior secured Term Loan A facility due 2018</td><td>$ 1,630,662</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Senior secured Term Loan B facility due 2020</td><td>932,895</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>4 1/2% senior unsecured notes</td><td>700,000</td><td>700,000</td></tr><tr><td>7 3/8% senior unsecured notes</td><td>600,000</td><td>600,000</td></tr><tr><td>7 3/4% debentures</td><td>99,664</td><td>99,642</td></tr><tr><td>Senior secured Term Loan A facility due 2016 - United States dollar-denominated</td><td>—</td><td>560,000</td></tr><tr><td>Senior secured Term Loan B facility due 2016 - United States dollar-denominated</td><td>—</td><td>340,000</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>3,963,221</td><td>2,299,642</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Current portion of long-term debt</td><td>85,000</td><td>88,000</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>$ 3,878,221</td><td>$ 2,211,642</td></tr></table>

Please refer to Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” for the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013.

Subsequent to February 2, 2014, the Company amended and restated its senior secured credit facilities (which are discussed below in the section entitled “2013 Senior Secured Credit Facilities”) and borrowed additional amounts thereunder and redeemed its $600,000 7 3/8% senior notes due May 15, 2020. Please see Note 22, “Subsequent Events (Unaudited),” for a further discussion. The following discussion is for the Company’s debt as of February 2, 2014 and does not give effect to such amendment and restatement and redemption.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

ratio of the Company’s senior secured net debt to consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (in each case calculated as set forth in the documentation relating to the 2013 facilities) would not exceed 3 to 1 after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence of such increase, plus, in either case, an amount equal to the aggregate revolving commitments of any defaulting lender (to the extent the commitments with respect thereto have been terminated). The lenders under the 2013 facilities are not required to provide commitments with respect to such additional facilities or increased commitments.

During 2013, the Company made payments of $500,188 on its term loans under the 2013 facilities, the majority of which was voluntary. As of February 2, 2014, the Company had total term loans outstanding of $2,563,557, net of original issue discounts. The terms of each of Term Loan A and Term Loan B contain a mandatory quarterly repayment schedule. Due to the above-mentioned voluntary payments, the Company is not required to make any additional mandatory repayments under Term Loan B prior to maturity.

The outstanding borrowings under the 2013 facilities are prepayable at any time without penalty. The terms of the 2013 facilities require the Company to repay certain amounts outstanding thereunder with (a) net cash proceeds of the incurrence of certain indebtedness, (b) net cash proceeds of certain asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or condemnation) that exceed certain thresholds, to the extent such proceeds are not reinvested or committed to be reinvested in the business in accordance with customary reinvestment provisions and (c) a percentage of excess cash flow, which percentage is based upon the Company’s net leverage ratio during the relevant fiscal period.

The United States dollar-denominated borrowings under the 2013 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at the Company’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the United States federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00% and (iii) a one-month adjusted Eurocurrency rate plus 1.00% (provided that, in the case of Term Loan B, in no event will the base rate be deemed to be less than 1.75%) or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the new facilities (provided that, in the case of Term Loan B, in no event will the adjusted Eurocurrency rate be deemed to be less than 0.75%).

Canadian dollar-denominated borrowings under the revolving credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at the Company’s option, either (a) a Canadian prime rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the rate of interest per annum that Royal Bank of Canada establishes at its main office in Toronto, Ontario as the reference rate of interest in order to determine interest rates for loans in Canadian Dollars to its Canadian borrowers and (ii) the sum of (x) the average of the rates per annum for Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptances having a term of one month that appears on the display referred to as “CDOR Page” of Reuters Monitor Money Rate Services as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on the date of determination, as reported by the administrative agent (and if such screen is not available, any successor or similar service as may be selected by the administrative agent), and (y) 0.75%, or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the new facilities.

The borrowings under the revolving credit facilities in currencies other than United States dollars or Canadian dollars bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the new facilities.

The current applicable margins are in the case of Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities, 2.00% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 1.00% for base rate loans, as applicable. The applicable margins in the case of Term Loan B are fixed at 2.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 1.50% for base rate loans, respectively. After the date of delivery of the compliance certificate and financial statements with respect to the Company’s fiscal year ending February 2, 2014, the applicable margin for borrowings under Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities is subject to adjustment based on the Company’s year-end net leverage ratio.

During 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on August 19, 2013. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $1,228,750 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under its United States dollar-denominated senior secured Term Loan A facility, or any replacement facility with similar terms, to fixed rate debt. As of February 2, 2014, the notional amount outstanding was $1,091,492. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the one-month LIBOR is eliminated, and it will pay a fixed rate of 0.604%, plus the current applicable margin.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

During 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a three-year term commencing on June 6, 2011. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of converting an initial notional amount of $632,000 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under its previously outstanding United States dollar-denominated senior secured Term Loan A facility, or any replacement facility with similar terms, to fixed rate debt. Such agreement remains outstanding, with a notional amount of $326,008 as of February 2, 2014, subsequent to the repayment of the Company’s previously outstanding 2011 facility and, as of February 2, 2014, is converting a portion of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under its Term Loan A facility in the 2013 facilities to fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the agreement for the then-outstanding notional amount, the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the three-month LIBOR is eliminated, and it will pay a fixed rate of 1.197%, plus the current applicable margin.

The outstanding notional amount of each interest rate swap will be adjusted according to pre-set schedules during the term of each swap agreement such that, based on the Company’s projections for future debt repayments, the Company’s outstanding debt under the Term Loan A facility is expected to always equal or exceed the then-outstanding combined notional amount of the interest rate swaps.

In addition, during 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement for a 15-month term commencing on June 6, 2011. The agreement was designed with the intended effect of capping the interest rate on an initial notional amount of €165,895 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligation under its previously outstanding Euro-denominated senior secured Term Loan A and B facilities. Such cap agreement expired September 6, 2012.

The 2013 facilities contain covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to finance future operations or capital needs, to take advantage of other business opportunities that may be in its interest or to satisfy its obligations under its other outstanding debt. These covenants restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things:

• incur or guarantee additional debt or extend credit;

- make restricted payments, including paying dividends or making distributions on, or redeeming or repurchasing, the Company’s capital stock or certain debt;

• make acquisitions and investments;

• dispose of assets;

• engage in transactions with affiliates;

• enter into agreements restricting the Company’s subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;

• create liens on the Company’s assets or engage in sale/leaseback transactions; and

• effect a consolidation or merger, or sell, transfer, or lease all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The 2013 facilities require the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum interest coverage and maximum net leverage. A breach of any of these operating or financial covenants would result in a default under the applicable facility. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts then outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable, which would result in acceleration of the Company’s other debt. If the Company was unable to repay any such borrowings when due, the lenders could proceed against their collateral, which also secures some of the Company’s other indebtedness.

## 4 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2022

On December 20, 2012, the Company issued $700,000 principal amount of 4 1/2% senior notes due December 15, 2022 in connection with the Warnaco acquisition. Interest on the 4 1/2% notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2013. The Company paid $16,257 of fees in the first quarter of 2013 in connection with the issuance of these notes, which will be amortized over the term of the notes.

The Company may redeem some or all of these notes at any time prior to December 15, 2017 by paying a “make whole” premium plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Subject to certain conditions, the Company may also redeem up to 35% of these notes prior to December 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings without having to pay a penalty or “make whole” premium. In addition, the Company may redeem some or all of these notes on or after December 15, 2017 at specified redemption prices plus any accrued and unpaid interest. The Company’s ability to pay cash dividends and make other restricted payments is limited, in each case, over specified amounts as defined in the indenture governing the notes.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 7 3/8% Senior Notes Due 2020

On May 6, 2010, the Company issued $600,000 principal amount of 7 3/8% senior notes due May 15, 2020. Interest on the notes was payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company received the requisite consents from holders of these notes to amend the indenture governing the notes. Under the terms of the consent solicitation, the Company paid $5,749 during the fourth quarter of 2012 to the holders of the notes. The Company redeemed the notes in March 2014. Please see Note 22, “Subsequent Events (Unaudited),” for a further discussion.

## 7 3/4% Debentures Due 2023

The Company has outstanding $100,000 of debentures due on November 15, 2023 with a yield to maturity of 7.80%. The debentures accrue interest at the rate of 7 3/4%, which is payable semi-annually. Pursuant to the indenture governing the debentures, the Company must maintain a certain level of stockholders' equity in order to pay cash dividends and make other restricted payments, as defined in the indenture governing the debentures.

Substantially all of the Company’s assets have been pledged as collateral to secure the Company’s obligations under its senior secured credit facilities, the 7 3/4% debentures due 2023 and contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein as discussed in Note 4, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

Interest paid was $170,756, $96,687 and $111,433 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

## 8. INCOME TAXES

The domestic and foreign components of income before provision for income taxes were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Domestic</td><td>$ 98,772</td><td>$ 229,080</td><td>$ 127,393</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign</td><td>229,994</td><td>314,032</td><td>235,692</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 328,766</td><td>$ 543,112</td><td>$ 363,085</td></tr></table>

Taxes paid were $45,813, $55,502 and $71,873 in 2013, 2012 and 2011.

The provision (benefit) for income taxes attributable to income consisted of the following:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Federal:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current</td><td>$ 116,950</td><td>$ 18,743</td><td>$ 18,053</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred</td><td>(29,331)</td><td>35,766</td><td>17,880</td></tr><tr><td>State and local:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current</td><td>5,848</td><td>4,716</td><td>9,128</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred</td><td>(5,164)</td><td>6,305</td><td>(2,802)</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current</td><td>124,664</td><td>35,826</td><td>45,324</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred</td><td>(27,683)</td><td>7,916</td><td>(195)</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 185,284</td><td>$ 109,272</td><td>$ 87,388</td></tr></table>



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company’s provision for income taxes for the years 2013, 2012 and 2011 was different from the amount computed by applying the statutory United States federal income tax rates to the underlying income as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Statutory federal tax rate</td><td>35.0 %</td><td>35.0 %</td><td>35.0 %</td></tr><tr><td>State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit</td><td>(3.0)%</td><td>1.2 %</td><td>0.8 %</td></tr><tr><td>Effects of international jurisdictions, including foreign tax credits</td><td>(23.9)%</td><td>(14.3)%</td><td>(10.9)%</td></tr><tr><td>Nondeductible professional fees in connection with acquisitions</td><td>— %</td><td>1.0 %</td><td>— %</td></tr><tr><td>Change in estimates for uncertain tax positions</td><td>44.3 %</td><td>0.7 %</td><td>(0.3)%</td></tr><tr><td>Previously unrecognized tax credits</td><td>— %</td><td>(1.0)%</td><td>— %</td></tr><tr><td>Decreases in international income tax rates</td><td>— %</td><td>— %</td><td>(1.4)%</td></tr><tr><td>Change in valuation allowance</td><td>5.8 %</td><td>(1.6)%</td><td>(1.6)%</td></tr><tr><td>Other, net</td><td>(1.8)%</td><td>(0.9)%</td><td>2.5 %</td></tr><tr><td>Effective tax rate</td><td>56.4 %</td><td>20.1 %</td><td>24.1 %</td></tr></table>

In 2013, the Company recorded $145,525 of tax expense, which increased the 2013 effective tax rate by 44.3% and is displayed in the above table as change in estimates for uncertain tax positions. The majority of this expense relates to an increase to the Company’s previously established liability for an uncertain tax position related to European and United States transfer pricing arrangements. Such liabilities are expected to continue to be adjusted as facts and circumstances change. Also in 2013, the Company recorded expense of $19,227, which increased the 2013 effective tax rate by 5.8%. The majority of this expense relates to valuation allowances recorded on deferred tax assets from the Company’s business in Japan, as well as certain domestic state and local deferred tax assets.

Effects of international jurisdictions, including foreign tax credits, reflected in the above table for 2013, 2012 and 2011 include not only those taxes at statutory income tax rates but also taxes at special rates levied on income from certain jurisdictional activities. The Company expects to benefit from these special rates until 2023.

The components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Gross deferred tax assets</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tax loss and credit carryforwards</td><td>$ 282,888</td><td>$ 95,665</td></tr><tr><td>Employee compensation and benefits</td><td>82,414</td><td>102,105</td></tr><tr><td>Inventories</td><td>18,047</td><td>13,765</td></tr><tr><td>Accounts receivable</td><td>26,698</td><td>12,751</td></tr><tr><td>Accrued expenses</td><td>38,051</td><td>22,844</td></tr><tr><td>Other, net</td><td>40,194</td><td>8,022</td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal</td><td>488,292</td><td>255,152</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation allowances</td><td>(43,553)</td><td>(9,945)</td></tr><tr><td>Total gross deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances</td><td>$ 444,739</td><td>$ 245,207</td></tr><tr><td>Gross deferred tax liabilities</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Intangibles</td><td>$ (1,197,118)</td><td>$ (712,496)</td></tr><tr><td>Property, plant and equipment</td><td>(75,113)</td><td>(22,732)</td></tr><tr><td>Total gross deferred tax liabilities</td><td>$ (1,272,231)</td><td>$ (735,228)</td></tr><tr><td>Net deferred tax liability</td><td>$ (827,492)</td><td>$ (490,021)</td></tr></table>

At the end of 2013, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3,926, tax effected state tax loss carryforwards of approximately $37,984, which at current apportionment percentages would equate to approximately $1,404,744 of income (which is subject to change based upon future apportionment percentages), foreign net operating loss



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

carryforwards of $451,085 and federal, state and local carryforwards of $183,610. The carryforwards expire principally between 2014 and 2033. The valuation allowance increase relates primarily to tax attributes (e.g., state, local and foreign net operating loss carryforwards) for which the Company currently believes it is more likely than not that a portion of these losses will be realized.

The Company does not provide for deferred taxes on the excess of financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in all of its foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. The earnings that are permanently reinvested were $1,723,499 as of February 2, 2014. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable if these earnings were repatriated due to the complexities associated with the hypothetical calculation.

Uncertain tax positions activity for each of the last two years was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 197,964</td><td>$ 184,004</td></tr><tr><td>Increase due to assumed Warmaco positions</td><td>142,778</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Increases related to prior year tax positions</td><td>123,396</td><td>3,775</td></tr><tr><td>Decreases related to prior year tax positions</td><td>(3,194)</td><td>(2,747)</td></tr><tr><td>Increases related to current year tax positions</td><td>64,059</td><td>22,114</td></tr><tr><td>Lapses in statute of limitations</td><td>(38,290)</td><td>(10,939)</td></tr><tr><td>Effects of foreign currency translation</td><td>(1,004)</td><td>1,757</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ 485,709</td><td>$ 197,964</td></tr></table>

The entire amount of uncertain tax positions as of February 2, 2014, if recognized, would reduce the future effective tax rate under current accounting provisions.

Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recorded in the Company’s income tax provision. Interest and penalties recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statements totaled an expense of $15,306 and $3,420 for 2013 and 2012, respectively. Interest and penalties accrued in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013 totaled $67,853 and $13,997, respectively. The Company records its liabilities for uncertain tax positions principally in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the anticipated timing of relieving such liabilities.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States and in various foreign, state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, examinations have been completed by tax authorities or the statute of limitations has expired for United States federal, foreign, state and local income tax returns filed by the Company for years through 2005. It is reasonably possible that a reduction of uncertain tax positions in a range of $70,000 to $100,000 may occur within 12 months of February 2, 2014.

## 9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to certain anticipated cash flows associated with certain international inventory purchases. In addition, the Company has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on certain intercompany loans. To help manage these exposures, the Company periodically uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts.

The Company also has exposure to interest rate volatility related to its senior secured term loan facilities. The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against this exposure. The Company had also entered into an interest rate cap agreement, which expired on September 6, 2012. Please see Note 7, “Debt,” for a further discussion of the Company’s senior secured term loan facilities and these agreements.

The Company records the foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate contracts at fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheets, and does not net the related assets and liabilities. Changes in fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts associated with certain international inventory purchases and the interest rate contracts (collectively referred to as “cash flow hedges”) that are designated as effective hedging instruments are recorded in equity as a component of



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

AOCI. The cash flows from such hedges are presented in the same category on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the items being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in such cash flow hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and no contracts were excluded from effectiveness testing. In addition, the Company records immediately in earnings changes in the fair value of hedges that are not designated as effective hedging instruments (“undesignated contracts”), including all of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts related to intercompany loans, which are not of a long-term investment nature. Any gains and losses that are immediately recognized in earnings on such contracts related to intercompany loans are largely offset by the remeasurement of the underlying intercompany loan balances. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Company’s derivative financial instruments:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Asset Derivatives (Classified in Other Current Assets and Other Assets)</td><td colspan="2">Liability Derivatives (Classified in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities)</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Contracts designated as cash flow hedges:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (inventory purchases)</td><td>$ 4,978</td><td>$ 4,693</td><td>$ 6,170</td><td>$ 13,460</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate contracts</td><td>2,189</td><td>—</td><td>6,821</td><td>5,058</td></tr><tr><td>Total contracts designated as cash flow hedges</td><td>7,167</td><td>4,693</td><td>12,991</td><td>18,518</td></tr><tr><td>Undesignated contracts:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (intercompany loans)</td><td>786</td><td>—</td><td>53</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total undesignated contracts</td><td>786</td><td>—</td><td>53</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 7,953</td><td>$ 4,693</td><td>$ 13,044</td><td>$ 18,518</td></tr></table>

At February 2, 2014, the notional amount outstanding of foreign currency forward exchange contracts for inventory purchases and intercompany loans was approximately $544,000 and $87,000, respectively. Such contracts expire between February 2014 and January 2015 for inventory purchases and between February 2014 and March 2014 for intercompany loans.

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s hedges designated as cash flow hedging instruments:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Effective Portion)</td><td colspan="2">(Loss) Gain Reclassified from AOCI into (Expense) Income (Effective Portion)</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>Location</td><td>Amount</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (inventory purchases)</td><td>$ 4,763</td><td>$ (7,535)</td><td>Cost of goods sold</td><td>$ (1,061)</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate contracts</td><td>(5,879)</td><td>(1,683)</td><td>Interest expense</td><td>(6,305)</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ (1,116)</td><td>$ (9,218)</td><td>$ (7,366)</td><td>$ 8,004</td></tr></table>

There was no ineffective portion of hedges designated as cash flow hedging instruments during 2013 or 2012.

A net loss in AOCI on foreign currency forward exchange contracts at February 2, 2014 of $4,490 is estimated to be reclassified in the next 12 months in the Consolidated Income Statements to costs of goods sold as the underlying inventory is purchased and sold. In addition, a net loss in AOCI for interest rate contracts at February 2, 2014 of $5,706 is estimated to be reclassified to interest expense within the next 12 months.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s foreign currency forward exchange undesignated contracts:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income</td></tr><tr><td>Location</td><td colspan="2">Amount</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (inventory purchases)</td><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 1,211</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (intercompany loans)</td><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>(1,435)</td><td>157</td></tr></table>

The Company had no derivative financial instruments with credit risk related contingent features underlying the related contracts as of February 2, 2014.

## 10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a three level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available.

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">2013</td><td colspan="4">2012</td></tr><tr><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Assets:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 5,764</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 5,764</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 4,693</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 4,693</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate contracts</td><td>N/A</td><td>2,189</td><td>N/A</td><td>2,189</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>Total Assets</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 7,953</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 7,953</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 4,693</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 4,693</td></tr><tr><td>Liabilities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 6,223</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 6,223</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 13,460</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 13,460</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate contracts</td><td>N/A</td><td>6,821</td><td>N/A</td><td>6,821</td><td>N/A</td><td>5,058</td><td>N/A</td><td>5,058</td></tr><tr><td>Contingent purchase price payments related to reacquisition of the perpetual rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 4,237</td><td>4,237</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 7,003</td><td>7,003</td></tr><tr><td>Total Liabilities</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 13,044</td><td>$ 4,237</td><td>$ 17,281</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 18,518</td><td>$ 7,003</td><td>$ 25,521</td></tr></table>

The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts is measured as the total amount of currency to be purchased, multiplied by the difference between (i) the forward rate as of the period end and (ii) the settlement rate specified in



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

each contract. The fair values of the interest rate contracts are based on observable interest rate yield curves and represent the expected discounted cash flows underlying the financial instruments.

Pursuant to the agreement governing the reacquisition of the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks, the Company is required to make annual contingent purchase price payments into 2016 (or, under certain circumstances, into 2017) based on a percentage of annual sales in excess of an agreed upon threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India. Such payments are subject to a $25,000 aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. The Company made contingent annual purchase price payments of $429 and $185 during 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company is required to remeasure this liability at fair value on a recurring basis and classifies this as a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of such contingent purchase price payments was determined using the discounted cash flow method, based on net sales projections for the Tommy Hilfiger apparel and accessories businesses in India, and was discounted using rates of return that account for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows. Excluding the initial recognition of the liability for the contingent purchase price payments and payments made to reduce the liability, changes in the fair value are included within selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following table presents the change in the Level 3 contingent purchase price payment liability during 2013 and 2012:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Beginning Balance</td><td>$ 7,003</td><td>$ 9,559</td></tr><tr><td>Payments</td><td>(429)</td><td>(185)</td></tr><tr><td>Adjustments included in earnings</td><td>(2,337)</td><td>(2,371)</td></tr><tr><td>Ending Balance</td><td>$ 4,237</td><td>$ 7,003</td></tr></table>

Additional information with respect to assumptions used to value the contingent purchase price payment liability as of February 2, 2014 is as follows:

<table><tr><td>Unobservable Inputs</td><td>Amount</td></tr><tr><td>Approximate compounded annual net sales growth rate</td><td>38.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Approximate discount rate</td><td>20.0%</td></tr></table>

A five percentage point increase or decrease in the discount rate would change the liability by approximately $500.

A five percentage point increase or decrease in the compounded annual net sales growth rate would change the liability by approximately $500.

There were no transfers between any levels of the fair value hierarchy for any of the Company’s fair value measurements.

The following table shows the fair value of the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that were required to be remeasured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (consisting of property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets) during 2013 and 2012, and the total impairments recorded as a result of the remeasurement process:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Fair Value Measurement Using</td><td rowspan="2">Fair Value As Of Impairment Date</td><td rowspan="2">Total Impairments</td></tr><tr><td>Level 1</td><td>Level 2</td><td>Level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 1,072</td><td>$ 1,072</td><td>$ 8,757</td></tr><tr><td>2012</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>$ 2,229</td><td>$ 2,229</td><td>$ 7,475</td></tr></table>

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $8,668 were written down to a fair value of $1,072 during 2013 in connection with the financial performance in certain of the Company’s retail stores. Fair value was determined based on the estimated



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

discounted future cash flows associated with the assets using current sales trends and market participant assumptions. The impairment charge of $7,596 was included in selling, general and administrative expenses, of which $808 was recorded in the Calvin Klein North America segment, $947 was recorded in the Calvin Klein International segment, $3,121 was recorded in the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment, $2,226 was recorded in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment and $494 was recorded in the Heritage Brands Retail segment.

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $1,161 were written down to a fair value of zero during 2013 in connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Heritage Brands Retail segment.

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $259 were written down to a fair value of zero during 2012 in connection with the exit of a facility as part of the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger. Such assets were deemed to have no future use or economic benefit based on the Company’s analysis using market participant assumptions, and therefore no expected future cash flows. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment.

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $9,445 were written down to a fair value of $2,229 during 2012 in connection with the financial performance in certain of the Company’s retail stores. Fair value was determined based on the estimated discounted future cash flows associated with the assets using current sales trends and market participant assumptions. The impairment charge of $7,216 was included in selling, general and administrative expenses, of which $671 was recorded in the Heritage Brands Retail segment, $281 was recorded in the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment and $6,264 was recorded in the Tommy Hilfiger International segment.

In connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business in 2013, the Company guaranteed lease payments for substantially all of the business’ retail stores under the current terms of noncancelable leases expiring on various dates through 2022. These guarantees include minimum rent payments and relate to leases that commenced prior to the sale of the Bass assets. In certain instances, the Company’s guarantee may remain in effect if an option is exercised to extend the term of the lease. The estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations as of February 2, 2014 is $4,056, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company classifies this as a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of such guarantee obligations was determined using the discounted cash flow method, based on the guaranteed lease payments, the estimated probability of lease extensions and estimates of the risk of default by the buyer of the Bass assets, and was discounted using rates of return that account for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows.

The carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term borrowings and long-term debt were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">2013</td><td colspan="2">2012</td></tr><tr><td>Carrying Amount</td><td>Fair Value</td><td>Carrying Amount</td><td>Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 593,159</td><td>$ 593,159</td><td>$ 892,209</td><td>$ 892,209</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings</td><td>6,796</td><td>6,796</td><td>10,847</td><td>10,847</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt (including portion classified as current)</td><td>3,963,221</td><td>4,025,291</td><td>2,299,642</td><td>2,398,200</td></tr></table>

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term debt using quoted market prices as of the last business day of the applicable year. The Company classifies the measurement of its long-term debt as a Level 1 measurement.

## 11. RETIREMENT AND BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has five noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all employees resident in the United States who meet certain age and service requirements as of February 2, 2014. As part of the Warnaco acquisition, the Company acquired a frozen noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. Such plan was merged with an existing plan during



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

2013. For those vested (after five years of service), the plans provide monthly benefits upon retirement based on career compensation and years of credited service. The Company refers to these five plans as its “Pension Plans.”

The Company also has for certain members of Tommy Hilfiger’s domestic senior management a supplemental executive retirement plan, which is an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plan. Such plan is frozen and, as a result, participants do not accrue additional benefits. In addition, the Company has a capital accumulation program, which is an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan covering three current and 15 retired executives as of February 2, 2014. Under the individual participants’ agreements, the participants in this plan will receive a predetermined amount during the 10 years following the attainment of age 65, provided that prior to the termination of employment with the Company, the participant has been in the plan for at least 10 years and has attained age 55. The Company also has for certain employees resident in the United States who meet certain age and service requirements an unfunded non-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plan, which provides benefits for compensation in excess of Internal Revenue Service earnings limits and requires payments to vested employees upon, or shortly after, employment termination or retirement. The Company refers to these three plans as its “SERP Plans.”

The Company also provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain retirees resident in the United States. Retirees contribute to the cost of this plan, which is unfunded. During 2002, the postretirement plan was amended to eliminate the Company contribution, which partially subsidized benefits, for active participants who, as of January 1, 2003, had not attained age 55 and 10 years of service. As a result of the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco, the Company also provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain Warnaco retirees resident in the United States. Retirees contribute to the cost of this plan, which is unfunded. This plan was frozen on January 1, 2014. The Company refers to these two plans as its “Postretirement Plans.”

Reconciliations of the changes in the projected benefit obligation (Pension Plans and SERP Plans) and the accumulated benefit obligation (Postretirement Plans) for each of the last two years were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Plans</td><td colspan="2">SERP Plans</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Plans</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 406,395</td><td>$ 359,727</td><td>$ 74,861</td><td>$ 71,717</td><td>$ 16,036</td><td>$ 18,247</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of Warnaco</td><td>182,379</td><td>—</td><td>165</td><td>—</td><td>4,472</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost</td><td>18,721</td><td>15,315</td><td>4,415</td><td>3,579</td><td>83</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>26,395</td><td>17,974</td><td>3,619</td><td>3,366</td><td>863</td><td>798</td></tr><tr><td>Benefit payments</td><td>(30,541)</td><td>(14,456)</td><td>(4,392)</td><td>(2,674)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Benefit payments, net of retiree contributions</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(2,150)</td><td>(1,959)</td></tr><tr><td>Plan curtailments</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(2,172)</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Plan settlements</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(6,977)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Medicare subsidy</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>14</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial (gain) loss</td><td>(31,838)</td><td>27,835</td><td>2,120</td><td>5,850</td><td>(1,046)</td><td>(1,106)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ 571,511</td><td>$ 406,395</td><td>$ 80,788</td><td>$ 74,861</td><td>$ 16,100</td><td>$ 16,036</td></tr></table>



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Reconciliations of the fair value of the assets held by the Company’s Pension Plans and the plans’ funded status for each of the last two years were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year</td><td>$ 384,022</td><td>$ 268,505</td></tr><tr><td>Acquisition of Warnaco</td><td>143,547</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Actual return, net of plan expenses</td><td>58,572</td><td>24,973</td></tr><tr><td>Benefit payments</td><td>(30,541)</td><td>(14,456)</td></tr><tr><td>Company contributions</td><td>60,000</td><td>105,000</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of plan assets at end of year</td><td>$ 615,600</td><td>$ 384,022</td></tr><tr><td>Funded status at end of year</td><td>$ 44,089</td><td>$ (22,373)</td></tr></table>

Amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Plans</td><td colspan="2">SERP Plans</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Plans</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Non-current assets</td><td>$ 49,505</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Current liabilities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(6,508)</td><td>(7,021)</td><td>(2,103)</td><td>(1,965)</td></tr><tr><td>Non-current liabilities</td><td>(5,416)</td><td>(22,373)</td><td>(74,280)</td><td>(67,840)</td><td>(13,997)</td><td>(14,071)</td></tr><tr><td>Net amount recognized</td><td>$ 44,089</td><td>$ (22,373)</td><td>$ (80,788)</td><td>$ (74,861)</td><td>$ (16,100)</td><td>$ (16,036)</td></tr></table>

Pre-tax amounts in AOCI that, as of the end of each applicable fiscal year, had not yet been recognized as components of net benefit cost were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Plans</td><td colspan="2">SERP Plans</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Plans</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Prior service (cost) credit</td><td>$ (10)</td><td>$ (16)</td><td>$ 204</td><td>$ 272</td><td>$ 1,438</td><td>$ 2,255</td></tr></table>

Pre-tax amounts in AOCI as of February 2, 2014 expected to be recognized as components of net benefit cost in 2014 were as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="2">Pension Plans</td><td colspan="2">SERP Plans</td><td colspan="2">Postretirement Plan</td></tr><tr><td>$</td><td>(5)</td><td>$</td><td>68</td><td>$</td><td>775</td></tr></table>

The assets of the Pension Plans are invested with the objective of being able to meet current and future benefit payment needs, while controlling future contributions. The assets of the Pension Plans are diversified among United States equities, international equities, fixed income investments and cash. The strategic target allocation for the majority of the Pension Plans as of February 2, 2014 was approximately 40% United States equities, 20% international equities and 40% fixed income investments. Equity securities primarily include investments in large-, mid- and small-cap companies located in the United States and abroad. Fixed income securities include corporate bonds of companies from diversified industries, municipal bonds, collective funds and United States Treasury bonds. Actual investment allocations may vary from the Company’s target investment allocations due to prevailing market conditions.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described in Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” the following tables show the fair value of the total assets of the Company’s Pension Plans for each major category as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Total</td><td colspan="4">Fair Value Measurements as of February 2, 2014(1)</td></tr><tr><td>Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)</td><td>Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)</td><td>Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset Category</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>United States equities(1)</td><td>$ 244,700</td><td>$ 244,700</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>International equities(1)</td><td>23,991</td><td>23,991</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>United States equity fund(2)</td><td>19,298</td><td>—</td><td>19,298</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>International equity fund(3)</td><td>63,433</td><td>63,433</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Government securities(4)</td><td>51,592</td><td>—</td><td>51,592</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Corporate securities(4)</td><td>168,560</td><td>—</td><td>168,560</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Asset and mortgage-backed securities(4)</td><td>10,331</td><td>—</td><td>10,331</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Short-term investment funds(5)</td><td>27,002</td><td>—</td><td>27,002</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total return mutual fund(6)</td><td>5,312</td><td>5,312</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal</td><td>$ 614,219</td><td>$ 337,436</td><td>$ 276,783</td><td>$ —</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other assets and liabilities(7)</td><td>1,381</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 615,600</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td rowspan="2">Total</td><td colspan="4">Fair Value Measurements as of February 3, 2013(1)</td></tr><tr><td>Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)</td><td>Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)</td><td>Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>United States equities(1)</td><td>$ 65,101</td><td>$ 65,101</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>International equities(1)</td><td>1,266</td><td>1,266</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Global equity mutual fund(8)</td><td>16,373</td><td>16,373</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>United States equity fund(9)</td><td>42,183</td><td>42,183</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>International equity commingled fund(10)</td><td>46,976</td><td>—</td><td>46,976</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Government securities(4)</td><td>19,356</td><td>—</td><td>19,356</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Corporate securities(4)</td><td>86,982</td><td>—</td><td>86,982</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Short-term investment funds(5)</td><td>99,297</td><td>—</td><td>99,297</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total return mutual fund(6)</td><td>4,784</td><td>4,784</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal</td><td>$ 382,318</td><td>$ 129,707</td><td>$ 252,611</td><td>$ —</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other assets and liabilities(7)</td><td>1,704</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 384,022</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(1) Valued at the closing price or unadjusted quoted price in the active market in which the individual securities are traded.

(2) Valued at the net asset value of the fund, as determined by a pricing vendor or the fund family. The Company has the ability to redeem these investments at net asset value within the near term and therefore classifies these investments within Level 2. This commingled fund invests in United States large cap equities that track the Russell 1000 Index.

(3) Valued at the net asset value of the fund, as determined by the closing price in the active market in which the individual fund is traded. This mutual fund invests in a portfolio of equities outside the United States.

(4) Valued with bid evaluation pricing where the inputs are based on actual trades in active markets, when available, as well as observable market inputs that include actual and comparable trade data, market benchmarks, broker quotes, trading spreads and/or other applicable data.

(5) Valued at the net asset value of the funds, as determined by a pricing vendor or the fund family. The Company has the ability to redeem these investments at net asset value within the near term and therefore classifies these investments within Level 2. These funds invest in high-grade, short-term, money market instruments.

(6) Valued at the net asset value of the fund, as determined by the closing price in the active market in which the individual fund is traded. This fund invests in both equity securities and fixed income securities seeking a high total return.

(7) This category includes other pension assets and liabilities such as pending trades and accrued income.

(8) Valued at the net asset value of the fund, as determined by the closing price in the active market in which the individual fund is traded. This fund invests in a portfolio of United States and international equities seeking long-term growth of principal and income.

(9) Valued at the closing price in the active market in which this fund is traded. This fund invests in United States large cap equities that track the Russell 1000 Index.

(10) Valued at the net asset value of the fund, as determined by a pricing vendor or the fund family. The Company has the ability to redeem these investments at net asset value within the near term and therefore classifies these investments within Level 2. This fund invests primarily in equities outside the United States seeking long-term capital appreciation.

(11) The Company uses third-party pricing services to determine the fair values of the financial instruments held by the Pension Plans. The Company obtains an understanding of the pricing services' valuation methodologies and related inputs and validates a sample of prices provided by the pricing services by reviewing prices from other pricing sources and analyzing pricing data in certain instances. The Company has not adjusted any prices received from the third-party pricing services.

The Company believes that there are no significant concentrations of risk within its plan assets at February 2, 2014.

In 2013, two of the Company’s Pension Plans had projected benefit obligations and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets. In 2012, all of the Company’s Pension Plans had projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets and three of the Company’s Pension Plans had accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets. The balances were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Number of plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Aggregate projected benefit obligation</td><td>$ 27,735</td><td>$ 406,395</td></tr><tr><td>Aggregate fair value of related plan assets</td><td>$ 22,319</td><td>$ 384,022</td></tr><tr><td>Number of plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets</td><td>2</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation</td><td>$ 25,391</td><td>$ 33,730</td></tr><tr><td>Aggregate fair value of related plan assets</td><td>$ 22,319</td><td>$ 30,583</td></tr></table>



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The components of net benefit cost and other pre-tax amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) in each of the last three years were as follows:

Net Benefit Cost Recognized in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">Pension Plans</td><td colspan="3">SERP Plans</td><td colspan="3">Postretirement Plans</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>(2011)</td></tr><tr><td>Service cost, including plan expenses</td><td>$ 19,201</td><td>$15,729</td><td>$11,550</td><td>$ 4,415</td><td>$ 3,579</td><td>$ 3,069</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>26,395</td><td>17,974</td><td>17,391</td><td>3,619</td><td>3,366</td><td>3,602</td><td>863</td><td>798</td><td>1,018</td></tr><tr><td>Actuarial (gain) loss</td><td>(51,441)</td><td>23,398</td><td>64,683</td><td>2,120</td><td>5,850</td><td>10,296</td><td>(1,046)</td><td>(1,106)</td><td>1,141</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>(39,449)</td><td>(20,950)</td><td>(20,514)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost (credit)</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>(68)</td><td>(68)</td><td>(68)</td><td>(817)</td><td>(817)</td><td>(817)</td></tr><tr><td>Curtailment gain</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>(2,172)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ (45,288)</td><td>$36,157</td><td>$73,116</td><td>$10,086</td><td>$12,727</td><td>$16,899</td><td>$ (3,089)</td><td>$ (1,125)</td><td>$ 1,342</td></tr></table>

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">Pension Plans</td><td colspan="4">SERP Plans</td><td colspan="4">Postretirement Plans</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>(2011)</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Prior service cost</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$—</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service (cost) credit</td><td>(6)</td><td>(6)</td><td>(6)</td><td>68</td><td>68</td><td>68</td><td>817</td><td>817</td><td>817</td><td>817</td><td>817</td><td>817</td></tr><tr><td>(Income) loss recognized in other comprehensive income</td><td>$ (6)</td><td>$ (5)</td><td>$ (6)</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 817</td><td>$ 817</td><td>$ 817</td><td>$ 817</td><td>$ 817</td></tr></table>

Currently, the Company expects to make contributions of approximately $2,500 to its Pension Plans in 2014. The Company’s actual contributions may differ from planned contributions due to many factors, including changes in tax and other benefit laws, or significant differences between expected and actual pension asset performance or interest rates. The expected benefit payments associated with the Company’s Pension Plans and SERP Plans, and expected benefit payments, net of retiree contributions, associated with the Company’s Postretirement Plans are as follows:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">Prestetirement Plans</td></tr><tr><td>SERP Plans</td><td>Excluding Medicare Subsidy Receipts</td><td>Expected Medicare Subsidy Receipts</td></tr><tr><td>2014 \(</td><td>27,547</td><td>6,508</td><td>2,103</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>28,358</td><td>6,436</td><td>1,981</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>28,851</td><td>6,257</td><td>1,830</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>29,561</td><td>5,704</td><td>1,704</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>30,608</td><td>6,131</td><td>1,598</td></tr><tr><td>2019-2023</td><td>170,170</td><td>49,511</td><td>6,233</td></tr></table>



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The medical health care cost trend rate assumed for 2014 is 6.17% and is assumed to decrease by approximately 0.14% per year through 2023. Thereafter, the rate assumed is 4.95%. If the assumed health care cost trend rate increased or decreased by 1%, the aggregate effect on the service and interest cost components of the net postretirement benefit cost for 2013 and on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at February 2, 2014 would be as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>1% Increase</td><td>1% Decrease</td></tr><tr><td>Impact on service and interest cost</td><td>$ 81</td><td>$ (69)</td></tr><tr><td>Impact on year end accumulated postretirement benefit obligation</td><td>1,060</td><td>(970)</td></tr></table>

Significant weighted average rate assumptions used in determining the projected and accumulated benefit obligations at the end of each year and benefit cost in the following year were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>5.07%</td><td>4.67%</td><td>5.06%</td></tr><tr><td>Rate of increase in compensation levels (applies to Pension Plans only)</td><td>4.33%</td><td>4.34%</td><td>4.31%</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term rate of return on assets (applies to Pension Plans only)</td><td>7.25%</td><td>7.25%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr></table>

To develop the expected weighted average long-term rate of return on assets assumption, the Company considered the historical level of the risk premium associated with the asset classes in which the portfolio is invested and the expectations for future returns of each asset class. The expected return for each asset class was then weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption for the portfolio.

The Company has savings and retirement plans and a supplemental savings plan for the benefit of its eligible employees who elect to participate. The Company matches a portion of employee contributions to the plans. The Company also has a defined contribution plan for certain employees associated with certain businesses acquired in the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition, whereby the Company pays a percentage of the contribution for the employee. The Company’s contributions to these plans were $21,849, $15,114 and $12,664 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

## 12. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

## Common Stock Issuance

On February 13, 2013, the Company issued 7,674 shares of its common stock, par value $1.00 per share, as part of the consideration paid to the former stockholders of Warnaco in connection with the acquisition.

## Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

In 2010, the Company sold 8 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock for net proceeds of $188,595 after related fees and expenses. During 2012, the holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock converted such convertible preferred stock into 4,189 shares of the Company’s common stock. Holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock were entitled to vote and participate in dividends with the holders of the Company’s common stock on an as-converted basis. Due to the conversion of such stock, there were no holders of the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock as of February 3, 2013. During 2013, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a certificate eliminating the Series A convertible preferred stock.

## Common Stock Dividends

During each of 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company paid four $0.0375 per share cash dividends on its common stock.

## 13. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company grants stock-based awards under its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan replaced the Company’s 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Plan”) and certain other prior stock option plans. The 2003 Plan and these other plans terminated upon the 2006 Plan’s initial stockholder approval in June 2006, other than with respect to outstanding



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

options, which continued to be governed by the applicable prior plan. Only awards under the 2003 Plan continue to be outstanding insofar as these prior plans are concerned. Shares issued as a result of stock-based compensation transactions generally have been funded with the issuance of new shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company may grant the following types of incentive awards under the 2006 Plan: (i) non-qualified stock options (“NQs”); (ii) incentive stock options (“ISOs”); (iii) stock appreciation rights; (iv) restricted stock; (v) restricted stock units (“RSUs”); (vi) performance share units; and (vii) other stock-based awards. Each award granted under the 2006 Plan is subject to an award agreement that incorporates, as applicable, the exercise price, the term of the award, the periods of restriction, the number of shares to which the award pertains, applicable performance period(s) and performance measure(s), and such other terms and conditions as the plan committee determines.

Through February 2, 2014, the Company has granted under the 2006 Plan: (i) service-based NQs, RSUs and restricted stock; (ii) contingently issuable performance share units; and (iii) RSUs that are intended to satisfy the performance-based condition for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. According to the terms of the 2006 Plan, for purposes of determining the number of shares available for grant, with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards discussed below, each share underlying a stock option award reduces the number available by one share, each share underlying a restricted stock award reduces the number available by two shares and each share underlying an RSU or performance share unit award reduces the number available by three shares for awards made before April 29, 2009 and by two shares for awards made on or after April 29, 2009. Each share underlying a Warnaco employee replacement stock option, restricted stock, RSU or performance share unit award reduces the number available by one share. The per share exercise price of options granted under the 2006 Plan cannot be less than the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant (the business day prior to the date of grant for awards granted prior to September 21, 2006).

The Company currently has service-based NQs and ISOs outstanding under the 2003 Plan. Such options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the business day immediately preceding the date of grant.

Under the terms of the merger agreement in connection with the Warnaco acquisition, each outstanding award of Warnaco stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units was assumed by the Company and converted into an award of the same type, and, subject to the same terms and conditions, but payable in shares of Company common stock. The stock options are generally exercisable in three equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of original grant and the RSUs and restricted stock awards generally vest three years after the date of original grant, principally on a cliff basis. The Company accounted for the replacement awards as a modification of the existing awards. As such, a new fair value was assigned to the awards, a portion of which is included as part of the merger consideration. The merger consideration of $39,752 was determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the Warnaco awards outstanding at the effective time of the Warnaco acquisition, net of the estimated value of awards to be forfeited, by the proportionate amount of the vesting period that had lapsed as of the acquisition date. The remaining fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, is being expensed on a straight-line basis over the awards' remaining vesting periods.

Net income for 2013, 2012 and 2011 included $57,954, $33,599 and $40,938, respectively, of pre-tax expense related to stock-based compensation.

Stock options currently outstanding, with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards discussed above, are generally cumulatively exercisable in four equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. The vesting of such options outstanding is also generally accelerated upon retirement (as defined in the applicable plan). Such options are generally granted with a 10-year term.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. The estimated fair value of the options, net of estimated forfeitures, is expensed on a straight-line basis over the options' vesting periods. At February 2, 2014, there was $13,213 of unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of service-based stock options granted during 2013 (with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement stock options), 2012 and 2011:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.05%</td><td>1.20%</td><td>2.62%</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average expected option term (in years)</td><td>6.22</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.25</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average Company volatility</td><td>45.20%</td><td>45.16%</td><td>44.35%</td></tr><tr><td>Expected annual dividends per share</td><td>$ 0.15</td><td>$ 0.15</td><td>$ 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average grant date fair value per option</td><td>$ 51.51</td><td>$ 40.59</td><td>$ 29.81</td></tr></table>

The risk-free interest rate is based on United States Treasury yields in effect at the date of grant for periods corresponding to the expected option term. The expected option term represents the weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, based on vesting schedules and the contractual term of the options. Company volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a period of time corresponding to the expected option term. Expected dividends are based on the Company’s common stock cash dividend rate at the date of grant.

The Company has continued to utilize the simplified method to estimate the expected term for its “plain vanilla” stock options granted due to a lack of relevant historical data resulting, in part, from changes in the pool of employees receiving option grants, mainly due to acquisitions. The Company will continue to evaluate the appropriateness of utilizing such method.

The following summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the Warnaco employee stock options that were replaced at the effective time of the acquisition:

<table><tr><td>Weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.24%</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average expected option term (in years)</td><td>1.70</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average Company volatility</td><td>29.40%</td></tr><tr><td>Expected annual dividends per share</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average grant date fair value per option</td><td>40.60</td></tr></table>

Service-based stock option activity for the year was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Options</td><td>Weighted Average Price Per Option</td><td>Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)</td><td>Aggregate Intrinsic Value</td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding at February 3, 2013</td><td>1,958</td><td>44.17</td><td>5.4</td><td>$ 141,117</td></tr><tr><td>Replacement of Warnaco awards</td><td>443</td><td>86.26</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>182</td><td>117.03</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exercised</td><td>978</td><td>52.72</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cancelled</td><td>17</td><td>95.05</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding at February 2, 2014</td><td>1,588</td><td>58.47</td><td>5.9</td><td>$ 99,319</td></tr><tr><td>Exercisable at February 2, 2014</td><td>977</td><td>44.02</td><td>4.8</td><td>$ 75,095</td></tr></table>

The aggregate grant date fair value of service-based options granted during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $9,390, $7,607 and $5,819, respectively. At the effective time of the Warnaco acquisition, the aggregate fair value of the Warnaco employee service-based options that were replaced during 2013 was $17,987.

The aggregate grant date fair value of service-based options that vested during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $18,428, $5,517 and $4,707, respectively.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The aggregate intrinsic value of service-based options exercised was $70,777, $27,760 and $34,364 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

RSUs granted to employees, with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards, generally vest in three annual installments of 25%, 25% and 50% commencing two years after the date of grant. Service-based RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest in four equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant for awards granted prior to 2010 and vest in full one year after the date of grant for awards granted during or after 2010. The underlying RSU award agreements (excluding agreements for non-employee director awards made during or after 2010) generally provide for accelerated vesting upon the award recipient’s retirement (as defined in the 2006 Plan). The fair value of service-based RSUs, with the exception of the Warnaco employee replacement awards, is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is expensed, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the RSUs’ vesting periods.

RSU activity for the year was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>RSUs</td><td>Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Non-vested at February 3, 2013</td><td>660</td><td>$ 62.24</td></tr><tr><td>Replacement of Warnaco awards</td><td>120</td><td>120.72</td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>246</td><td>119.19</td></tr><tr><td>Vested</td><td>277</td><td>65.48</td></tr><tr><td>Cancelled</td><td>47</td><td>89.76</td></tr><tr><td>Non-vested at February 2, 2014</td><td>702</td><td>$ 89.06</td></tr></table>

The aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $29,330, $17,128 and $17,325, respectively. At the effective time of the Warnaco acquisition, the aggregate fair value of the Warnaco employee RSUs that were replaced during 2013 was $14,452. The aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs vested during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $18,131, $14,318 and $8,874, respectively.

At February 2, 2014, there was $28,874 of unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.

The Company’s restricted stock awards outstanding in 2013 consist solely of awards to Warnaco employees that were replaced with the Company’s restricted stock as of the effective time of the acquisition. The fair value of restricted stock with respect to awards for which the vesting period had not lapsed as of the acquisition date was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 12, 2013 and is expensed, net of forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

The Company granted restricted stock to certain of Tommy Hilfiger’s management employees in 2010 in connection with the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition. All such restricted stock was vested as of February 3, 2013. The fair value of the restricted stock was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on May 6, 2010 and was expensed, net of forfeitures, on a straight line basis over the restricted stock’s vesting period.



# PVH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Restricted stock activity for the year was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Restricted Stock</td><td>Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Non-vested at February 3, 2013</td><td>—</td><td>$ —</td></tr><tr><td>Replacement of Warnaco awards</td><td>271</td><td>120.72</td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Vested</td><td>216</td><td>120.72</td></tr><tr><td>Cancelled</td><td>9</td><td>120.72</td></tr><tr><td>Non-vested at February 2, 2014</td><td>46</td><td>$ 120.72</td></tr></table>

Except for the replacement of awards for Warnaco employees, no restricted stock was granted during 2013, 2012 or 2011. At the effective time of the Warnaco acquisition, the aggregate fair value of the Warnaco employee restricted stock awards that were replaced during 2013 was $32,653. The aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock vested during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $26,014, $20,116 and $1,020, respectively.

At February 2, 2014, there was $1,275 of unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year.

The Company granted contingently issuable performance share units to certain of the Company’s senior executives during the first quarter of each of 2012 and 2013 subject to a performance period of two years and a service period of one year beyond the performance period. The Company granted contingently issuable performance share units to certain of the Company’s senior executives during the first quarter of 2011 subject to a performance period of two years. The Company granted contingently issuable performance share units to certain of the Company’s executives during the second quarter of each of 2010 and 2013 subject to performance periods of three years each. The holders of the awards granted during the second quarter of 2010 that were subject to a performance period of three years earned an aggregate of 498 shares as a result of the Company’s performance during such three-year period. For the awards granted in the second quarter of 2013, the final number of shares that will be earned, if any, is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of goals for the performance period, of which 50 percent is based upon the Company’s absolute stock price growth during the performance period and 50 percent is based upon the Company’s total shareholder return during the performance period relative to other companies included in the S&P 500 as of the date of grant. For the awards granted in the first quarter of 2013, the final number of shares that will be earned, if any, is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of goals for the performance period based on earnings per share growth during the performance cycle. For the awards granted in the first quarter of 2012, the two year performance period has ended and the final number of shares, as determined based on both earnings per share growth and return on equity during the performance period, will vest following the additional one year service period.

For the contingently issuable performance share units granted prior to the second quarter of 2013, the Company records expense ratably over each applicable vesting period based on fair value and the Company’s current expectations of the probable number of shares that will ultimately be issued. The fair value of these contingently issuable performance share units is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, reduced for the present value of any dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock during the performance cycle, as these contingently issuable performance share units do not accrue dividends prior to the completion of the performance cycle.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

For the contingently issuable performance share units granted during the second quarter of 2013, because the awards are subject to market conditions, the Company records expense ratably over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied. The fair value of such awards was established on the grant date using the Monte Carlo simulation model, which was based on the following assumptions:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.34%</td></tr><tr><td>Expected Company volatility</td><td>38.67%</td></tr><tr><td>Expected annual dividends per share</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Grant date fair value per performance share unit</td><td>123.27</td></tr></table>

Performance share activity for the year was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Performance Shares</td><td>Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value</td></tr><tr><td>Non-vested at February 3, 2013</td><td>594</td><td>57.08</td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>513</td><td>122.01</td></tr><tr><td>Vested</td><td>498</td><td>51.07</td></tr><tr><td>Cancelled</td><td>61</td><td>100.24</td></tr><tr><td>Non-vested at February 2, 2014</td><td>548</td><td>118.60</td></tr></table>

Awards granted in the above table reflect performance awards subject to market conditions at the target level, which is consistent with how expense will be recorded, regardless of the number of shares actually earned. Performance awards that are not subject to market conditions are reflected at the maximum level. As of the grant date, the final number of shares that will be earned for the awards granted during 2013 ranges from zero to 833 for the awards with market conditions and from zero to 97 for the awards without market conditions. The share payout will be determined based upon the Company’s achievement of goals for each applicable performance period, as further described above.

The aggregate grant date fair value of performance shares granted during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $62,625, $8,440 and $6,644, respectively. The aggregate grant date fair value of performance shares vested during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $25,436, $5,877 and $6,043, respectively.

At February 2, 2014, based on the Company’s current estimate of the most likely number of shares that will ultimately be issued, there was $39,624 of unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense related to non-vested performance shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.

The Company receives a tax deduction for certain transactions associated with its stock plan awards. The actual income tax benefits realized from these transactions were $69,715, $24,078 and $19,415 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Of those amounts, $37,639, $14,889 and $11,593, respectively, were reported as excess tax benefits. Excess tax benefits arise when the actual tax benefit resulting from a stock plan award transaction exceeds the tax benefit associated with the grant date fair value of the related stock award. The Company recognizes these excess tax benefits in additional paid in capital only if an incremental tax benefit would be realized after considering all other tax benefits presently available to the Company.

Total stock awards available for grant at February 2, 2014 amounted to 4,693 shares.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 14. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following table sets forth the detail of AOCI, net of related taxes, by component:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>Retirement liability adjustment</td><td>Net unrealized and realized (loss) gain on effective hedges</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at February 3, 2013</td><td>$ 153,648</td><td>$ 1,552</td><td>$ (15,318)</td><td>$ 139,882</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications</td><td>(103,529)</td><td>—</td><td>(309)</td><td>(103,838)</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCI</td><td>—</td><td>541</td><td>(6,819)</td><td>(6,278)</td></tr><tr><td>Other comprehensive (loss) income</td><td>(103,529)</td><td>(541)</td><td>6,510</td><td>(97,560)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at February 2, 2014</td><td>$ 50,119</td><td>$ 1,011</td><td>$ (8,808)</td><td>$ 42,322</td></tr></table>

The following table presents reclassifications out of AOCI to earnings:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Amount Reclassified from AOCI</td><td>Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Income Statements</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Realized loss on effective hedges:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Foreign currency forward exchange contracts</td><td>$ (1,061)</td><td>Cost of goods sold</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate contracts</td><td>(6,305)</td><td>Interest expense</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Tax effect</td><td>(547)</td><td>Income tax expense</td></tr><tr><td>Total, net of tax</td><td>$ (6,819)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of retirement liability items:</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Prior service credit</td><td>$ 879</td><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Tax effect</td><td>338</td><td>Income tax expense</td></tr><tr><td>Total, net of tax</td><td>$ 541</td><td></td></tr></table>

## 15. LEASES

The Company leases retail locations, warehouses, showrooms, office space and equipment. The leases, excluding equipment leases, generally provide for the payment of real estate taxes and certain other occupancy expenses. Retail location leases generally are renewable and provide for the payment of percentage rentals based on location sales and other costs associated with the leased property.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

At February 2, 2014, minimum annual rental commitments under non-cancelable leases were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Capital Leases</td><td>Operating Leases</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>2014</td><td>$ 8,049</td><td>$ 429,417</td><td>$ 437,466</td></tr><tr><td>2015</td><td>6,420</td><td>353,308</td><td>359,728</td></tr><tr><td>2016</td><td>3,941</td><td>308,132</td><td>312,073</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>2,352</td><td>266,928</td><td>269,280</td></tr><tr><td>2018</td><td>1,834</td><td>223,560</td><td>225,394</td></tr><tr><td>Thereafter</td><td>5,719</td><td>675,916</td><td>681,635</td></tr><tr><td>Total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 28,315</td><td>$ 2,257,261</td><td>$ 2,285,576</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Amount representing interest</td><td>(2,990)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Present value of net minimum capital lease payments</td><td>$ 25,325</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

The Company’s retail location leases represent $1,533,655 of the total minimum lease payments. The Company’s administrative offices and showrooms located in New York, New York represent $86,184 of the total minimum lease payments. The Company’s corporate, finance and retail administrative offices located in Bridgewater, New Jersey represent $43,013 of the total minimum lease payments. The Company’s Calvin Klein administrative offices and showrooms located in New York, New York represent $200,055 of the total minimum lease payments. The Company’s Tommy Hilfiger administrative offices and showrooms, most of which are located in Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, New York represent $163,519 of the total minimum lease payments.

At February 2, 2014, aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable capital and operating subleases were $3,877 and $22,479, respectively.

Rent expense was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Minimum</td><td>$ 440,008</td><td>$ 318,659</td><td>$ 290,936</td></tr><tr><td>Percentage and other</td><td>159,844</td><td>127,581</td><td>95,352</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Sublease rental income</td><td>(5,437)</td><td>(3,366)</td><td>(3,441)</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 594,415</td><td>$ 442,874</td><td>$ 382,847</td></tr></table>

The gross book value of assets under capital leases, which are classified within property, plant and equipment in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, amounted to $35,031 and $45,813 as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to assets under capital leases amounted to $10,065 and $14,604 as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, respectively. The Company includes amortization of assets under capital leases in depreciation and amortization expense. The Company incurred $0 during each of the years ended February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013 in percentage rentals under capital leases.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

## 16. ACTIVITY EXIT COSTS

## Warnaco Integration Costs

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco during the first quarter of 2013 and the related integration, the Company incurred certain costs related to severance and termination benefits, inventory liquidations and lease/contract terminations. Such costs were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Total Expected to be Incurred</td><td>Incurred During 2013</td><td>Liability at 2/2/14</td></tr><tr><td>Severance, termination benefits and other costs</td><td>$     170,000</td><td>$     131,543</td><td>$     33,644</td></tr><tr><td>Inventory liquidation costs</td><td>35,112</td><td>35,112</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Lease/contract termination and related costs</td><td>65,000</td><td>41,998</td><td>15,340</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$     270,112</td><td>$     208,653</td><td>$     48,984</td></tr></table>

Of the charges for severance, termination benefits and lease/contract termination and other costs incurred during 2013, $34,246 relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Calvin Klein International segment, $76,445 relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Calvin Klein International segment, $22,254 relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Heritage Brands Wholesale segment and $40,596 relate to corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment. The liabilities at February 2, 2014 related to these costs were principally recorded in accrued expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining charges for severance and termination benefits and lease/contract termination and other costs expected to be incurred relate principally to the aforementioned segments and corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment. Inventory liquidation costs incurred during 2013 were principally included in gross profit of the Calvin Klein International segment. Please see Note 19, “Segment Data.”

## Tommy Hilfiger Integration and Exit Costs

In connection with the Company’s acquisition and integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring, the Company incurred certain costs related to severance and termination benefits, long-lived asset impairments, inventory liquidations and lease/contract terminations, including costs associated with the exit of certain Tommy Hilfiger product categories. All expected costs related to this acquisition and integration and the related restructuring were incurred by the end of 2012. Such costs were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Incurred During 2011</td><td>Incurred During 2012</td><td>Cumulative Incurred</td></tr><tr><td>Severance, termination benefits and other costs</td><td>$ 12,415</td><td>$ 1,320</td><td>$ 33,528</td></tr><tr><td>Long-lived asset impairments</td><td>—</td><td>259</td><td>11,276</td></tr><tr><td>Inventory liquidation costs</td><td>7,627</td><td>—</td><td>10,210</td></tr><tr><td>Lease/contract termination and related costs</td><td>24,462</td><td>11,546</td><td>39,173</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 44,504</td><td>$ 13,125</td><td>$ 94,187</td></tr></table>

Of the charges for severance, termination benefits, asset impairments and lease/contract termination and other costs incurred in 2012, $379 relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment, $10,405 relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Tommy Hilfiger International segment and $2,341 relate to corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment. $33,385 of the charges for severance, termination benefits, lease/contract termination and other costs for 2011 relate principally to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment. The remaining $3,492 of the charges for severance, termination benefits, lease/contract termination and other costs for 2011 relate principally to corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment. Inventory liquidation costs for 2011 were included in cost of goods sold of the Tommy Hilfiger North America segment (see Note 19, “Segment Data”).



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Please see Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a further discussion of the long-lived asset impairments reflected in the above table.

Liabilities recorded in connection with the acquisition and integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring were principally recorded in accrued expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Liabilities for severance, termination benefits and other costs at February 3, 2013 totaled $763 and liabilities for lease/contract termination and related costs at February 3, 2013 totaled $2,013. Substantially all of these costs had been paid by February 2, 2014.

Costs Related to Exit from Timberland and Izod Women’s Businesses

The Company negotiated during the second quarter of 2011 an early termination of its license to market sportswear under the Timberland brand. The termination was completed in the second quarter of 2012. In connection with this termination, the Company incurred certain costs related to severance and termination benefits, long-lived asset impairments, contract termination and other costs. All expected costs related to this termination were incurred during 2011.

The Company announced in the fourth quarter of 2011 that it would be exiting the Izod women’s wholesale sportswear business during 2012. The exit was completed in the third quarter of 2012. In connection with this exit, the Company incurred certain costs related to severance and termination benefits. All expected costs related to this exit were incurred during 2011.

The costs associated with both of these activities were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>Incurred During 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Severance, termination benefits and other costs</td><td>2,027</td></tr><tr><td>Long-lived asset impairments</td><td>1,062</td></tr><tr><td>Contract termination and related costs</td><td>5,029</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>8,118</td></tr></table>

The charges incurred in 2011 relate to selling, general and administrative expenses of the Heritage Brands Wholesale segment (see Note 19, “Segment Data”).

Liabilities for severance and termination benefits and contract termination costs recorded in connection with the Company’s early termination of the license to market sportswear under the Timberland brand and exit from the Izod women’s wholesale sportswear business were principally recorded in accrued expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. All of these costs had been paid by the end of 2012.

## 17. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

In 2012 and 2011, the Company utilized the two-class method of calculating basic net income per common share, as holders of the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock participated in dividends with holders of the Company’s common stock prior to the conversion in 2012 of such convertible preferred stock into common stock. Net losses were not allocated to holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company computed its basic and diluted net income per common share as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 143,537</td><td>$ 433,840</td><td>$ 275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Less:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock dividends paid to holders of Series A convertible preferred stock</td><td>—</td><td>(366)</td><td>(628)</td></tr><tr><td>Allocation of income to Series A convertible preferred stock</td><td>—</td><td>(12,179)</td><td>(15,557)</td></tr><tr><td>Net income available to common stockholders for basic net income per common share</td><td>143,537</td><td>421,295</td><td>259,512</td></tr><tr><td>Add back:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Common stock dividends paid to holders of Series A convertible preferred stock</td><td>—</td><td>366</td><td>628</td></tr><tr><td>Allocation of income to Series A convertible preferred stock</td><td>—</td><td>12,179</td><td>15,557</td></tr><tr><td>Net income available to common stockholders for diluted net income per common share</td><td>$ 143,537</td><td>$ 433,840</td><td>$ 275,697</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic net income per common share</td><td>81,167</td><td>70,392</td><td>67,158</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average impact of dilutive securities</td><td>1,451</td><td>1,397</td><td>1,576</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average impact of assumed convertible preferred stock conversion</td><td>—</td><td>2,087</td><td>4,189</td></tr><tr><td>Total shares for diluted net income per common share</td><td>82,618</td><td>73,876</td><td>72,923</td></tr><tr><td>Basic net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 1.77</td><td>$ 5.98</td><td>$ 3.86</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 1.74</td><td>$ 5.87</td><td>$ 3.78</td></tr></table>

Potentially dilutive securities excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share were as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted average potentially dilutive securities</td><td>270</td><td>305</td><td>345</td></tr></table>

Contingently issuable shares that have not met the necessary conditions as of the end of a reporting period are not included in the calculation of diluted net income per common share for that period. The Company had contingently issuable awards outstanding that did not meet the performance conditions as of February 2, 2014, February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012 and, therefore, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for each applicable year. The maximum number of potentially dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting for such awards was 654, 100 and 590 as of February 2, 2014, February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012, respectively. These amounts were also excluded from the computation of weighted average antidilutive securities in the table above.

## 18. NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS

Omitted from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2013 were capital expenditures related to property, plant and equipment of $13,624, which will not be paid until 2014. The Company paid $4,184 in cash during 2013 related to property, plant and equipment that was acquired in 2012. This amount is omitted from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2012. The Company paid $5,786 in cash during 2012 related to property, plant and equipment that was acquired in 2011. This amount is omitted from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2011.

Omitted from purchases of property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2013, 2012 and 2011 are $7,525, $18,203 and $11,562, respectively, of assets acquired through capital leases.

The Company recorded increases to goodwill of $51,011, $51,715 and $51,309 during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to liabilities incurred for contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein. Such amounts are not due or paid in cash until 45 days subsequent to the Company’s applicable quarter end. As such, during 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

paid $52,773, $50,974 and $50,679, respectively, in cash related to contingent purchase price payments to Mr. Calvin Klein that were recorded as additions to goodwill during the periods the liabilities were incurred.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company issued 7,674 shares of its common stock, par value $1.00 per share (of which 416 shares were issued from treasury stock), as part of the consideration paid to the former stockholders of Warnaco in connection with the acquisition, which resulted in an increase in common stock of $7,258, an increase in additional paid in capital of $888,925 and a decrease in treasury stock of $30,269. In addition, the Company issued awards valued at $39,752 to replace outstanding stock awards made by Warnaco to its employees, which for accounting purposes are included in the total acquisition consideration. Also included in the acquisition consideration was the elimination of a $9,128 pre-acquisition liability to Warnaco.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a loss of $5,757 to write-off previously capitalized debt issuance costs in connection with the modification and extinguishment of its previously outstanding senior secured credit facilities.

During 2012, the holders of the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock converted an aggregate of 8 shares of such convertible preferred stock into 4,189 shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in a decrease in Series A convertible preferred stock of $188,595, an increase in common stock of $4,189, and an increase in additional paid in capital of $184,406. Please see Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity.”

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a loss of $12,876 to write off previously capitalized debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment and restatement of its senior secured credit facility.

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company reacquired the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks that had been subject to a perpetual license. The Company is required to make annual contingent purchase price payments into 2016 (or, under certain circumstances, into 2017) based on a percentage of annual sales over a certain threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India. Such payments are subject to a $25,000 aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one-year period. The fair value of such contingent purchase price payments, which was recorded as a liability as of the acquisition date, was estimated to be $9,559 as of the acquisition date.

## 19. SEGMENT DATA

The acquisition of Warnaco significantly impacted the way the Company and its chief operating decision maker manage and analyze its operating results. As such, the Company changed its reportable segments beginning with the first quarter of 2013. Prior year periods have been restated in order to present that information on a basis consistent with the current year.

The Company manages its operations through its operating divisions, which are presented as six reportable segments: (i) Calvin Klein North America; (ii) Calvin Klein International; (iii) Tommy Hilfiger North America; (iv) Tommy Hilfiger International; (v) Heritage Brands Wholesale; and (vi) Heritage Brands Retail.

Calvin Klein North America Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Calvin Klein North America division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Calvin Klein branded apparel and related products at wholesale in North America, primarily to department and specialty stores; (ii) operating retail stores, which are primarily located in outlet centers, and an e-commerce website for North American customers, which sell Calvin Klein branded apparel, accessories and related products; and (iii) licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the brand names Calvin Klein Collection, Calvin Klein on a platinum label and Calvin Klein on a white label for a broad array of products and retail services in North America.

Calvin Klein International Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Calvin Klein International division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Calvin Klein branded apparel and related products at wholesale principally in Europe, Asia and Brazil, primarily to department and specialty stores and franchise operators of Calvin Klein stores, and through distributors; (ii) operating retail stores in Europe, Asia and Brazil, which sell Calvin Klein branded apparel, accessories and related products; and (iii) licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the brand names Calvin Klein Collection, Calvin Klein on a platinum label and Calvin Klein on a white label for a broad array of products and retail services outside of North America.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Tommy Hilfiger North America Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Tommy Hilfiger North America division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel and related products at wholesale in North America, primarily to department stores, principally Macy’s; and (ii) operating retail stores, which are primarily located in outlet centers and an e-commerce website for North American customers, which sell Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel, accessories and related products. This segment also derives revenue from licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the Tommy Hilfiger brand name for a broad array of products in North America.

Tommy Hilfiger International Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Tommy Hilfiger International division. This segment derives revenue principally from (i) marketing Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel and related products at wholesale principally in Europe, primarily to department and specialty stores and franchise operators of Tommy Hilfiger stores, and through distributors and licensees; and (ii) operating retail stores in Europe and Japan, as well as operating an international e-commerce site, which sell Tommy Hilfiger branded apparel, accessories and related products. This segment also includes the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of its investments in unconsolidated Tommy Hilfiger foreign affiliates. This segment also derives revenue from licensing and similar arrangements relating to the use by third parties of the Tommy Hilfiger brand name for a broad array of products outside of North America.

Heritage Brands Wholesale Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Heritage Brands wholesale division. This segment derives revenue primarily from the marketing to department, chain and specialty stores in North America of: (i) dress shirts and neckwear under various owned and licensed brand names, including several private label brands; (ii) men’s sportswear under the brand names Van Heusen, IZOD and ARROW; (iii) swimwear, fitness apparel, swim accessories and related products under the brand name Speedo beginning in the first quarter of 2013; and (iv) women’s intimate apparel under the brand names Warner’s and Olga beginning in the first quarter of 2013. This segment also derived revenue through the second quarter of 2012 from marketing men’s sportswear under the brand name Timberland and through the third quarter of 2012 from marketing women’s sportswear under the brand name IZOD.

Heritage Brands Retail Segment - This segment consists of the Company’s Heritage Brands retail division. This segment derives revenue principally from operating retail stores, primarily in outlet centers in North America, which sell apparel, accessories and related products under the brand names Van Heusen and IZOD. This segment also derived revenue through the third quarter of 2013 under the brand names Bass and G.H. Bass & Co., principally from operating outlet stores.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following tables present summarized information by segment:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue - Calvin Klein North America</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$ 1,316,765</td><td>$ 714,862</td><td>$ 645,046</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>113,924</td><td>136,957</td><td>134,224</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>41,888</td><td>55,300</td><td>53,099</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,472,577</td><td>907,119</td><td>832,369</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue - Calvin Klein International</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>1,186,932</td><td>45,071</td><td>38,620</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>76,756</td><td>140,412</td><td>138,778</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>30,295</td><td>57,764</td><td>55,489</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,293,983</td><td>243,247</td><td>232,887</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue - Tommy Hilfiger North America</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>1,505,589</td><td>1,399,323</td><td>1,273,829</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>27,599</td><td>22,364</td><td>16,850</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>9,015</td><td>8,073</td><td>7,016</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,542,203</td><td>1,429,760</td><td>1,297,695</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue - Tommy Hilfiger International</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>1,834,793</td><td>1,732,228</td><td>1,703,582</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>51,718</td><td>50,038</td><td>45,195</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>4,548</td><td>4,964</td><td>4,329</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,891,059</td><td>1,787,230</td><td>1,753,106</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue - Heritage Brands Wholesale</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>1,420,287</td><td>991,781</td><td>1,102,182</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>16,433</td><td>15,477</td><td>16,166</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>2,780</td><td>4,872</td><td>3,856</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,439,500</td><td>1,012,130</td><td>1,122,204</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue - Heritage Brands Retail</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>541,774</td><td>657,556</td><td>646,769</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>4,247</td><td>4,771</td><td>4,822</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>1,008</td><td>1,186</td><td>772</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>547,029</td><td>663,513</td><td>652,363</td></tr><tr><td>Total Revenue</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>7,806,140</td><td>5,540,821</td><td>5,410,028</td></tr><tr><td>Royalty revenue</td><td>290,677</td><td>370,019</td><td>356,035</td></tr><tr><td>Advertising and other revenue</td><td>89,534</td><td>132,159</td><td>124,561</td></tr><tr><td>Total(2)</td><td>$ 8,186,351</td><td>$ 6,042,999</td><td>$ 5,890,624</td></tr></table>

(1) Includes $30,000 of sales returns for certain Warnaco wholesale customers in Asia in connection with the Company’s initiative to reduce excess inventory levels.

(2) No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue in 2013, 2012 and 2011.



## PVH CORP.

## NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes - Calvin Klein North America</td><td>$ 167,041</td><td>$ 182,124</td><td>$ 178,796</td></tr><tr><td>(Loss) income before interest and taxes - Calvin Klein International</td><td>(60,716)</td><td>102,544</td><td>99,009</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes - Tommy Hilfiger North America</td><td>242,473</td><td>200,121</td><td>81,142</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes - Tommy Hilfiger International</td><td>260,570</td><td>220,812</td><td>200,697</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes - Heritage Brands Wholesale</td><td>114,400</td><td>101,087</td><td>89,727</td></tr><tr><td>(Loss) income before interest and taxes - Heritage Brands Retail</td><td>(24,397)</td><td>13,498</td><td>28,731</td></tr><tr><td>Loss before interest and taxes - Corporate \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>(185,909)</td><td>(159,824)</td><td>(186,929)</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes</td><td>$ 513,462</td><td>$ 660,362</td><td>$ 491,173</td></tr></table>

(1) Includes corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments. Corporate expenses represent overhead operating expenses and include expenses for senior corporate management, corporate finance, information technology related to corporate infrastructure and actuarial gains and losses from the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans. Actuarial gains (losses) from the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans totaled $52,539, $ (28,142) and $ (76,120) in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(2) Income (loss) before interest and taxes for 2013 includes costs of $469,690 associated with the Company’s acquisition and integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $87,703 in Calvin Klein North America; $237,500 in Calvin Klein International; $43,874 in Heritage Brands Wholesale and $100,613 in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(3) Loss before interest and taxes for 2013 includes a loss of $20,228 associated with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business.

(4) Income before interest and taxes for 2013 includes income of $24,309 related to the amendment of an unfavorable contract. At the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition in 2010, a liability was recorded for such unfavorable contract. The amendment executed in the third quarter of 2013 adjusted the contract terms thereby reducing the amount by which the contract was unfavorable and resulted in a reduction of the liability, amounting to $24,309. Such income was included in the Company’s segments as follows: $12,000 in Tommy Hilfiger North America and $12,309 in Tommy Hilfiger International.

(5) Loss before interest and taxes for 2013 includes costs of $40,395 associated with the Company’s debt modification and extinguishment. Please refer to Note 7, “Debt,” for a further discussion.

(6) Income (loss) before interest and taxes for 2012 includes costs of $20,525 associated with the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $379 in Tommy Hilfiger North America; $15,441 in Tommy Hilfiger International and $4,705 in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(7) Loss before interest and taxes for 2012 includes costs of $42,579 associated with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco.

(8) Income before interest and taxes for 2011 includes costs of $8,118 related to the Company’s negotiated early termination of its license to market sportswear under the Timberland brand and its exit of the Izod women’s wholesale sportswear business.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(9) Income (loss) before interest and taxes for 2011 includes costs of $69,522 associated with the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring. Such costs were included in the Company’s segments as follows: $44,704 in Tommy Hilfiger North America; $5,419 in Tommy Hilfiger International; and $19,399 in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segments.

(10) Income before interest and taxes for 2011 includes a one-time expense of $20,709 recorded in connection with the Company’s reacquisition of the rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India that had been subject to a perpetual license. Please refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions and Divestitures,” for a further discussion.

(11) Loss before interest and taxes for 2011 includes costs of $16,233 associated with the Company’s modification of its senior secured credit facility. Please refer to Note 7, “Debt,” for a further discussion.

Intersegment transactions consist of transfers of inventory principally from the Heritage Brands Wholesale segment to the Heritage Brands Retail segment and the Calvin Klein North America segment. These transfers are recorded at cost plus a standard markup percentage. Such markup percentage on ending inventory is eliminated principally in the Heritage Brands Retail segment and the Calvin Klein North America segment.

<table><tr><td>Identifiable Assets</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein North America</td><td>$ 1,792,065</td><td>$ 752,029</td><td>$ 680,416</td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein International</td><td>2,975,748</td><td>584,860</td><td>580,578</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger North America</td><td>1,207,243</td><td>1,139,416</td><td>1,155,530</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger International</td><td>3,741,386</td><td>3,420,813</td><td>3,236,225</td></tr><tr><td>Heritage Brands Wholesale</td><td>1,399,453</td><td>555,544</td><td>572,828</td></tr><tr><td>Heritage Brands Retail</td><td>128,151</td><td>175,717</td><td>145,272</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate \( ^{(1)} \)</td><td>331,532</td><td>1,103,308</td><td>381,512</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$11,575,578</td><td>$ 7,731,687</td><td>$ 6,752,361</td></tr><tr><td>Depreciation and Amortization</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein North America</td><td>$ 61,790</td><td>$ 16,490</td><td>$ 14,724</td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein International</td><td>100,892</td><td>2,280</td><td>2,018</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger North America</td><td>29,558</td><td>26,364</td><td>28,093</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger International</td><td>82,584</td><td>72,632</td><td>63,447</td></tr><tr><td>Heritage Brands Wholesale</td><td>18,985</td><td>7,069</td><td>8,905</td></tr><tr><td>Heritage Brands Retail</td><td>11,230</td><td>10,705</td><td>9,592</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate</td><td>8,555</td><td>4,816</td><td>5,231</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 313,594</td><td>$ 140,356</td><td>$ 132,010</td></tr><tr><td>Identifiable Capital Expenditures \( ^{(2)} \)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein North America</td><td>$ 35,556</td><td>$ 32,597</td><td>$ 20,229</td></tr><tr><td>Calvin Klein International</td><td>42,739</td><td>3,137</td><td>4,286</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger North America</td><td>46,978</td><td>47,027</td><td>29,974</td></tr><tr><td>Tommy Hilfiger International</td><td>91,732</td><td>88,348</td><td>82,604</td></tr><tr><td>Heritage Brands Wholesale</td><td>7,350</td><td>5,058</td><td>8,599</td></tr><tr><td>Heritage Brands Retail</td><td>14,338</td><td>28,131</td><td>18,602</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate</td><td>7,889</td><td>4,654</td><td>7,613</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 246,582</td><td>$ 208,952</td><td>$ 171,907</td></tr></table>

(1) Corporate at February 3, 2013 included $700,000 of cash that arose from senior notes that were issued to fund a portion of the consideration for the Warnaco acquisition.



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(2) Capital expenditures in 2013 include $13,624 of accruals that will not be paid until 2014. Capital expenditures in 2012 include $4,184 of accruals that were not paid until 2013. Capital expenditures in 2011 include $5,786 of accruals that were not paid until 2012.

Property, plant and equipment, net based on the location where such assets are held, was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Domestic</td><td>$ 373,136</td><td>$ 321,247</td><td>$ 263,008</td></tr><tr><td>Canada</td><td>36,774</td><td>41,850</td><td>38,912</td></tr><tr><td>Europe</td><td>224,164</td><td>171,647</td><td>137,010</td></tr><tr><td>Asia</td><td>63,917</td><td>26,591</td><td>19,961</td></tr><tr><td>Other foreign</td><td>14,087</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 712,078</td><td>$ 561,335</td><td>$ 458,891</td></tr></table>

Revenue, based on location of origin, was as follows:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Domestic</td><td>$ 4,433,854</td><td>$ 3,662,150</td><td>$ 3,558,540</td></tr><tr><td>Canada</td><td>454,006</td><td>329,674</td><td>302,103</td></tr><tr><td>Europe</td><td>2,261,442</td><td>1,643,875</td><td>1,588,926</td></tr><tr><td>Asia</td><td>742,273</td><td>355,030</td><td>385,251</td></tr><tr><td>Other foreign</td><td>294,776</td><td>52,270</td><td>55,804</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$ 8,186,351</td><td>$ 6,042,999</td><td>$ 5,890,624</td></tr></table>

## 20. GUARANTEES

The Company guaranteed to a landlord the payment of rent and related costs by the tenant currently occupying space previously leased by the Company. The maximum amount guaranteed as of February 2, 2014 was approximately $3,900, which is subject to exchange rate fluctuation. The Company has the right to seek recourse of approximately $2,500 as of February 2, 2014, which is subject to exchange rate fluctuation. The guarantee expires on May 19, 2016. The estimated fair value of this guarantee obligation was immaterial as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013.

In connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of Company’s Bass business in 2013, the Company guaranteed lease payments for substantially all Bass retail stores included in the sale pursuant to the terms of noncancelable leases expiring on various dates through 2022. These guarantees include minimum rent payments and relate to leases that commenced prior to the sale of the Bass assets. In certain instances, the Company’s guarantee may remain in effect if an option is exercised to extend the term of the lease. The maximum amount guaranteed as of February 2, 2014 is approximately $78,000 and the Company has the right to seek recourse from the buyer of the Bass assets for the full amount. The estimated fair value of these guarantee obligations as of February 2, 2014 is $4,056, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Please see Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a further discussion.

The Company has certain other guarantees whereby it guaranteed the payment of amounts on behalf of certain other parties, none of which are material individually or in the aggregate.

## 21. OTHER COMMENTS

Included in accrued expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets are certain wholesale sales allowance accruals of $91,607 and $50,981 as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, respectively.

The Company’s asset retirement obligations are included in other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and relate to the Company’s obligation to dismantle or remove leasehold improvements from leased office or retail store



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

locations at the end of a lease term in order to restore a facility to a condition specified in the lease agreement. The Company records the fair value of the liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which it is legally or contractually incurred. Upon initial recognition of the asset retirement liability, an asset retirement cost is capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the asset by the same amount as the liability. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, the asset retirement cost is recognized as expense through depreciation over the asset’s useful life. Changes in the liability for the asset retirement obligations are recognized for the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of estimated cash flows. Accretion expense is recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses for the impacts of increasing the discounted fair value to its estimated settlement value.

The following table presents the activity related to the Company’s asset retirement obligations for each of the last two years:

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 12,503</td><td>$ 11,709</td></tr><tr><td>Business acquisitions</td><td>2,222</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Liabilities incurred</td><td>2,573</td><td>2,585</td></tr><tr><td>Liabilities settled (payments)</td><td>(923)</td><td>(1,160)</td></tr><tr><td>Accretion expense</td><td>498</td><td>294</td></tr><tr><td>Revisions in estimated cash flows</td><td>358</td><td>273</td></tr><tr><td>Currency translation adjustment</td><td>(690)</td><td>(1,198)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>$ 16,541</td><td>$ 12,503</td></tr></table>

The results of operations for the year ended February 2, 2014 includes income of $24,309 related to the amendment of an unfavorable contract. At the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition in 2010, a liability was recorded for such unfavorable contract. The amendment executed in 2013 adjusted the contract terms thereby reducing the amount by which the contract was unfavorable and resulted in a reduction of the liability, amounting to $24,309. Please see Note 19, “Segment Data,” for a further discussion.

The Company is a party to certain litigation which, in management’s judgment, based in part on the opinions of legal counsel, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.

## 22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)

On March 21, 2014 (the “Restatement Date”), the Company entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2013 facilities (as amended by the Amendment, the “2014 facilities”).

Among other things, the Amendment provides for an additional $350,000 principal amount of Term Loan A and an additional $250,000 principal amount of Term Loan B and extends the maturity of the Term Loan A and the revolving credit facilities from February 13, 2018 to February 13, 2019. The maturity of the Term Loan B remains February 13, 2020.

On the Restatement Date, the Company borrowed the additional $350,000 principal amount of Term Loan A and the additional $250,000 principal amount of Term Loan B made available pursuant to the 2014 facilities.

The following is a description of the material terms of the 2014 facilities:

The 2014 facilities consist of a $1,986,250 United States Dollar-denominated Term Loan A, a $1,188,563 United States Dollar-denominated Term Loan B and senior secured revolving credit facilities consisting of (a) a $475,000 United States Dollar denominated revolving credit facility, (b) a $25,000 United States Dollar denominated revolving credit facility available in United States Dollars or Canadian Dollars and (c) a €185,850 Euro-denominated revolving credit facility available in Euro, Pounds Sterling, Japanese Yen and Swiss Francs.

The Company has fully drawn the term loans under the 2014 facilities. The revolving credit facilities include amounts available for letters of credit. A portion of each of the United States dollar-denominated revolving credit facilities is also



# NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

available for the making of swingline loans. The issuance of such letters of credit and the making of any swingline loan reduces the amount available under the applicable revolving credit facility. So long as certain conditions are satisfied, the Company may add one or more term loan facilities or increase the commitments under the revolving credit facilities by an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (1) the sum of (x) $1,350,000 plus (y) the aggregate amount of all voluntary prepayments of term loans under the facilities and the revolving credit facilities (to the extent, in the case of voluntary prepayments of loans under the revolving credit facilities, there is an equivalent permanent reduction of the revolving commitments) plus (z) an amount equal to the aggregate revolving commitments of any defaulting lender (to the extent the commitments with respect thereto have been terminated) and (2) an additional unlimited amount as long as the ratio of the Company's senior secured net debt to consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (in each case calculated as set forth in the documentation relating to the 2014 facilities) would not exceed 3 to 1 after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence of such increase. The lenders under the 2014 facilities are not required to provide commitments with respect to such additional facilities or increased commitments.

Obligations of the Company under the 2014 facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s existing and future direct and indirect United States subsidiaries, with certain exceptions. Obligations of the European Borrower under the 2014 facilities are guaranteed by the Company, substantially all of its existing and future direct and indirect United States subsidiaries (with certain exceptions) and Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company and its domestic subsidiary guarantors have pledged certain of their assets as security for the obligations under the 2014 facilities.

The terms of the Term Loan A facility require the Company to repay quarterly amounts outstanding under such facility, commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2014. Such amounts will equal 5.00% per annum of the principal amount outstanding on the Restatement Date for the first eight full calendar quarters following the Restatement Date, 7.50% per annum of the principal amount for the four quarters thereafter and 10.00% per annum of the principal amount for the remaining quarters, in each case paid in equal installments and in each case subject to certain customary adjustments, with the balance due on the maturity date of the Term Loan A facility. The terms of the Term Loan B facility require the Company to repay the outstanding principal amount thereof on the maturity date of the Term Loan B facility. (As of the Restatement Date, the Company had, through voluntary and mandatory prepayments of amounts outstanding under the Term Loan B facility prior to the Restatement Date, reduced the required quarterly principal payments under the Term Loan B facility set forth in the 2013 facilities such that the only remaining payment is the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan B facility on the maturity date of the Term Loan B facility.)

The outstanding borrowings under the 2014 facilities are prepayable at any time without penalty (other than customary breakage costs and, solely with respect to the Term Loan B facility, any prepayment in connection with a Repricing Event (as defined in the 2014 facilities) that is consummated on or prior to the six-month anniversary of the Restatement Date). The terms of the 2014 facilities require the Company to repay certain amounts outstanding thereunder with (a) net cash proceeds of the incurrence of certain indebtedness, (b) net cash proceeds of certain asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or condemnation) that exceed certain thresholds, to the extent such proceeds are not reinvested or committed to be reinvested in the business in accordance with customary reinvestment provisions, and (c) a percentage of excess cash flow, which percentage is based upon the Company’s net leverage ratio during the relevant fiscal period.

The United States Dollar-denominated borrowings under the 2014 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at the Company’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the United States federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00% and (iii) a one-month adjusted Eurocurrency rate plus 1.00% (provided, that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the base rate be deemed to be less than 1.75%) or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities (provided, that, with respect to the Term Loan B facility, in no event will the adjusted Eurocurrency rate be deemed to be less than 0.75%).

Canadian Dollar-denominated borrowings under the 2014 facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, as determined at the Company’s option, either (a) a Canadian prime rate determined by reference to the greater of (i) the rate of interest per annum that Royal Bank of Canada establishes at its main office in Toronto, Ontario as the reference rate of interest in order to determine interest rates for loans in Canadian Dollars to its Canadian borrowers and (ii) the sum of (x) the average of the rates per annum for Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptances having a term of one month that appears on the display referred to as “CDOR Page” of Reuters Monitor Money Rate Services as of 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on the date of determination, as reported by the administrative agent (and if such screen is not available, any successor or similar service as



# PVH CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Currency and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

may be selected by the administrative agent), and (y) 0.75%, or (b) an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities.

The borrowings under the 2014 facilities in currencies other than United States Dollars or Canadian Dollars bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus an adjusted Eurocurrency rate, calculated in a manner set forth in the 2014 facilities.

The initial applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan A facility and each revolving credit facility will be 1.75% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 0.75% for base rate loans, respectively. The initial applicable margin with respect to the Term Loan B facility will be 2.50% for adjusted Eurocurrency rate loans and 1.50% for base rate loans, respectively. After the date of delivery of the compliance certificate and financial statements with respect to the Company’s fiscal quarter in which the Amendment occurred (i.e., the Company’s fiscal quarter ending May 4, 2014), the applicable margin for borrowings under the Term Loan A facility, the Term Loan B facility and the revolving credit facilities will be subject to adjustment based upon the Company’s net leverage ratio.

The 2014 facilities require the Company to comply with customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants. The 2014 facilities require the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum net leverage ratio. The method of calculating all of the components used in such financial covenants is set forth in the 2014 facilities.

The 2014 facilities contain customary events of default, including but not limited to nonpayment; material inaccuracy of representations and warranties; violations of covenants; certain bankruptcies and liquidations; cross-default to material indebtedness; certain material judgments; certain events related to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended; certain events related to certain of the guarantees by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and certain pledges of its assets and those of certain of its subsidiaries, as security for the obligations under the 2014 facilities; and a change in control (as defined in the 2014 facilities).

On March 24, 2014, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding 7 3/8% senior notes due May 15, 2020 (the “Notes”), representing an aggregate principal amount of $600,000. The redemption price of the Notes was 111.272% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date. The Notes were issued and the redemption was effected pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture, dated as of May 6, 2010, between the Company and U.S. National Bank Association, as trustee, as amended.



## PVH CORP.

## SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except per share data)

The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data (unaudited) for the corresponding thirteen week periods (except the fourth quarter of 2012, which included fourteen weeks) of the fiscal years presented:

<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">1st Quarter</td><td colspan="2">2nd Quarter</td><td colspan="2">3rd Quarter</td><td colspan="2">4th Quarter</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2013(1),(2),(3),(14)</td><td>2012(9)</td><td>2013(1),(4),(14)</td><td>2012(9)</td><td>2013(1),(4),(5),(6)</td><td>2012(9),(10),(11)</td><td>2013(1),(4),(6),(7),(8)</td><td>2012(9),(10),(11),(12),(13)</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>$ 1,910,160</td><td>$ 1,427,406</td><td>$ 1,964,847</td><td>$ 1,336,623</td><td>$ 2,259,125</td><td>$ 1,642,770</td><td>$ 2,052,219</td><td>$ 1,636,200</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit</td><td>951,861</td><td>756,829</td><td>1,026,088</td><td>742,661</td><td>1,171,778</td><td>869,084</td><td>1,069,543</td><td>880,656</td></tr><tr><td>Net (loss) income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>(10,316)</td><td>95,476</td><td>(5,399)</td><td>89,918</td><td>196,713</td><td>167,698</td><td>(37,461)</td><td>80,748</td></tr><tr><td>Basic net (loss) income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>(0.13)</td><td>1.33</td><td>(0.07)</td><td>1.24</td><td>2.41</td><td>2.31</td><td>(0.46)</td><td>1.11</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted net (loss) income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>(0.13)</td><td>1.30</td><td>(0.07)</td><td>1.22</td><td>2.37</td><td>2.27</td><td>(0.46)</td><td>1.09</td></tr><tr><td>Price range of stock per common share</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>High</td><td>125.50</td><td>92.81</td><td>134.98</td><td>93.06</td><td>134.57</td><td>99.05</td><td>138.94</td><td>121.26</td></tr><tr><td>Low</td><td>102.72</td><td>75.44</td><td>107.09</td><td>72.47</td><td>114.52</td><td>74.91</td><td>119.70</td><td>105.01</td></tr></table>

(1) The first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2013 include pre-tax costs of $182,477, $127,600, $61,042 and $98,571, respectively, associated with the Warnaco acquisition and the related integration and restructuring.

(2) The first quarter of 2013 includes pre-tax interest expense of $840 incurred prior to the Warnaco acquisition closing date related to the $700,000 of senior notes issued to fund a portion of the consideration for the acquisition.

(3) The first quarter of 2013 includes pre-tax costs of $40,395 associated with the Company’s debt modification and extinguishment.

(4) The second, third and fourth quarters of 2013 include a tax expense (benefit) of $28,024, $ (27,520), and $4,647, respectively, associated with non-recurring discrete items related to the Warnaco integration.

(5) The third quarter of 2013 includes pre-tax income of $24,309 due to the amendment of an unfavorable contract, which resulted in the reduction of a liability recorded at the time of the Tommy Hilfiger acquisition.

(6) The third and fourth quarters of 2013 include pre-tax losses of $19,453 and $775, respectively, associated with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business.

(7) The fourth quarter of 2013 includes a pre-tax actuarial gain of $52,539 on pension and other postretirement plans.

(8) The fourth quarter of 2013 includes a tax expense of $120,000 related to an increase to the Company’s previously established liability for an uncertain tax position related to European and United States transfer pricing arrangements.

(9) The first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2012 include pre-tax costs of $3,316, $4,541, $6,561 and $6,107, respectively, associated with the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger and related restructuring.

(10) The third and fourth quarters of 2012 include pre-tax costs of $6,412 and $36,167 associated with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco.



(11) The third and fourth quarters of 2012 include tax benefits of $4,500 and $9,451, respectively, resulting from the recognition of previously unrecognized net operating loss assets and tax credits.

(12) The fourth quarter of 2012 includes a pre-tax actuarial loss of $28,142 on pension and other postretirement plans.

(13) The fourth quarter of 2012 includes pre-tax interest expense of $3,656 incurred prior to the Warnaco acquisition closing date related to the $700,000 of senior notes issued to fund a portion of the consideration for the acquisition.

(14) The first and second quarters of 2013 include amounts that have been adjusted from the amounts that were previously reported in the Company’s 2013 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. During the process of finalizing the Warnaco purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company received additional information about facts and circumstances that existed as of the Warnaco acquisition date. As a result of the receipt of new information, which was included in the final valuation report from a third-party valuation firm, and considering the results of that report, the Company estimated the fair value of the order backlog acquired as part of the Warnaco acquisition to be $24,100 lower than the estimated provisional amount. As a result of this adjustment to fair value, the carrying amount of the order backlog (which was being amortized principally over six months) was retrospectively decreased as of February 13, 2013, with a corresponding increase to goodwill and other intangible assets (net of related deferred taxes), and the related order backlog amortization expense for the first and second quarters of 2013 was reduced. The Company recorded these measurement period adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2013 and applied the adjustments retrospectively in accordance with FASB guidance for business combinations. The measurement period adjustments were included in the results of the Calvin Klein International segment. The following presents amounts previously reported in the Company’s 2013 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as applicable, and the amounts as retrospectively adjusted:

<table><tr><td rowspan="2"></td><td colspan="4">First Quarter 2013</td><td colspan="4">Second Quarter 2013</td></tr><tr><td>As Originally Reported in Form 10-Q in 2013</td><td>Measurement Period Adjustments</td><td>As Retrospectively Adjusted</td><td>As Originally Reported in Form 10-Q in 2013</td><td>Measurement Period Adjustments</td><td>AS Retrospectively Adjusted</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net (loss) income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ (20,052)</td><td>$ 9,736</td><td>$ (10,316)</td><td>$ (15,996)</td><td>$ 10,597</td><td>$ (5,399)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic net (loss) income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>(0.25)</td><td>0.12</td><td>(0.13)</td><td>(0.20)</td><td>0.13</td><td>(0.07)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diluted net (loss) income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>(0.25)</td><td>0.12</td><td>(0.13)</td><td>(0.20)</td><td>0.13</td><td>(0.07)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>



## MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and, accordingly, include certain amounts based on management’s best judgments and estimates.

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the underlying transactions, including the acquisition and disposition of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s assets are safeguarded and transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, composed solely of directors who are independent in accordance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its charter, meets periodically with the Company’s independent auditors, the Company’s internal auditors and management to discuss internal control over financial reporting, auditing and financial reporting matters. Both the independent auditors and the Company’s internal auditors periodically meet alone with the Audit Committee and have free access to the Committee.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992 framework). Based on management’s assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2014. On February 13, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of The Warnaco Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Warnaco”). As the acquisition occurred during 2013, management excluded the Warnaco business from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting. As of February 2, 2014 and for the fiscal year then ended, total assets and total revenue of the Warnaco business represented 40% and 25%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated assets and revenue.

The Company’s independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, are appointed by the Audit Committee, subject to ratification by the Company’s stockholders. Ernst & Young LLP have audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The reports of the independent auditors are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ EMANUEL CHIRICO

/s/ MICHAEL SHAFFER

Emanuel Chirico
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
April 3, 2014

Michael Shaffer
Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating & Financial Officer
April 3, 2014



# REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of PVH Corp.

We have audited PVH Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). PVH Corp.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of The Warnaco Group, Inc., which is included in the 2013 consolidated financial statements of PVH Corp. and constituted 40% and 25% of total assets and revenue, respectively, as of February 2, 2014 and for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of PVH Corp. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of The Warnaco Group, Inc.

In our opinion, PVH Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of PVH Corp. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and redeemable non-controlling interest and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2014 and our report dated April 3, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



# REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of PVH Corp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PVH Corp. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and redeemable non-controlling interest and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule included in Item 15(a) (2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PVH Corp. and subsidiaries at February 2, 2014 and February 3, 2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2014 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), PVH Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated April 3, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York

April 3, 2014



## PVH CORP.

## FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(In thousands, except per share data, percents and ratios)

<table><tr><td></td><td>2013(1)</td><td>2012(2)</td><td>2011(3)</td><td>2010(4)</td><td>2009(5)</td></tr><tr><td>Summary of Operations</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Revenue</td><td>$ 8,186,351</td><td>$ 6,042,999</td><td>$ 5,890,624</td><td>$ 4,636,848</td><td>$ 2,398,731</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of goods sold, expenses and other income items</td><td>7,672,889</td><td>5,382,637</td><td>5,399,451</td><td>4,433,818</td><td>2,168,057</td></tr><tr><td>Income before interest and taxes</td><td>513,462</td><td>660,362</td><td>491,173</td><td>203,030</td><td>230,674</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense, net</td><td>184,696</td><td>117,250</td><td>128,088</td><td>126,822</td><td>32,229</td></tr><tr><td>Income tax expense</td><td>185,284</td><td>109,272</td><td>87,388</td><td>21,831</td><td>44,946</td></tr><tr><td>Net loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>(55)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net income attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 143,537</td><td>$ 433,840</td><td>$ 275,697</td><td>$ 54,377</td><td>$ 153,499</td></tr><tr><td>Per Share Statistics</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>$ 1.77</td><td>$ 5.98</td><td>$ 3.86</td><td>$ 0.83</td><td>$ 2.97</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted net income per common share attributable to PVH Corp.</td><td>1.74</td><td>5.87</td><td>3.78</td><td>0.81</td><td>2.92</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends paid per common share</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.155</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholders&#x27; equity per equivalent common share(6)</td><td>52.76</td><td>44.61</td><td>37.59</td><td>34.28</td><td>22.51</td></tr><tr><td>Financial Position</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current assets</td><td>$ 2,998,592</td><td>$ 2,437,006</td><td>$ 1,739,235</td><td>$ 1,835,289</td><td>$ 994,883</td></tr><tr><td>Current liabilities (including short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt)</td><td>1,552,397</td><td>1,162,447</td><td>1,043,871</td><td>931,255</td><td>362,881</td></tr><tr><td>Working capital</td><td>1,446,195</td><td>1,274,559</td><td>695,364</td><td>904,034</td><td>632,002</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>11,575,578</td><td>7,731,687</td><td>6,752,361</td><td>6,784,350</td><td>2,339,679</td></tr><tr><td>Capital leases</td><td>25,325</td><td>31,060</td><td>26,753</td><td>24,891</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>3,878,221</td><td>2,211,642</td><td>1,832,925</td><td>2,364,002</td><td>399,584</td></tr><tr><td>Stockholders&#x27; equity</td><td>4,335,179</td><td>3,252,569</td><td>2,715,449</td><td>2,442,544</td><td>1,168,553</td></tr><tr><td>Other Statistics</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total debt to total capital(7)</td><td>48.0%</td><td>41.9%</td><td>41.7%</td><td>49.5%</td><td>25.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Net debt to net capital(8)</td><td>44.0%</td><td>30.8%</td><td>38.6%</td><td>43.7%</td><td>(7.5)%</td></tr><tr><td>Current ratio</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td><td>1.7</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.7</td></tr></table>

(1) 2013 includes (a) pre-tax costs of $469,690 associated with the Company’s acquisition and integration of Warnaco and the related restructuring; (b) pre-tax costs of $40,395 associated with the Company’s debt modification and extinguishment; (c) pre-tax income of $24,309 due to the amendment of an unfavorable contract; (d) a pre-tax loss of $20,228 associated with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company’s Bass business; (e) a pre-tax actuarial gain of $52,539 on pension and other postretirement plans; (f) pre-tax interest expense of $840 incurred prior to the Warnaco acquisition closing date related to the $700,000 of senior notes issued to fund the acquisition; (g) a net tax expense of $5,151 associated with non-recurring discrete items related to the Warnaco acquisition; and (h) a tax expense of $120,000 related to an increase to the Company’s previously established liability for an uncertain tax position related to European and United States transfer pricing arrangements.

(2) 2012 includes (a) pre-tax costs of $20,525 associated with the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring; (b) pre-tax costs of $42,579 associated with the Company’s acquisition of Warnaco; (c) a pre-tax actuarial loss of $28,142 on pension and other postretirement plans; (d) pre-tax interest expense of $3,656 incurred in the fourth quarter related to the $700,000 of senior notes issued that quarter; and (e) a tax benefit of $13,951 resulting from the recognition of previously unrecognized net operating loss assets and tax credits.

(3) 2011 includes (a) pre-tax costs of $69,522 associated with the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger and the related restructuring; (b) pre-tax costs of $8,118 related to the Company’s negotiated early termination of its license to market sportswear under the Timberland brand and its exit of the Izod women’s wholesale sportswear business; (c) a pre-tax expense of $20,709 recorded in connection with the Company’s reacquisition of the rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India that had been subject to a perpetual license; (d) pre-tax costs of $16,233 associated with the Company’s modification of its senior secured credit facility; (e) a pre-tax actuarial loss of $76,120 on pension and other postretirement plans; and (f) a tax benefit of $5,352 resulting from the revaluation of certain deferred tax liabilities in connection with a decrease in the tax rate in Japan.



(4) 2010 includes (a) pre-tax costs of $338,317 associated with the Company’s acquisition and integration of Tommy Hilfiger, including transaction, restructuring and debt extinguishment costs and the effects of hedges against Euro to United States dollar exchange rates related to the purchase price; (b) pre-tax costs of $6,552 associated with the Company’s exit from its United Kingdom and Ireland Van Heusen dresswear and accessories business; (c) a pre-tax actuarial loss of $4,534 on pension and other postretirement plans; and (d) a tax benefit of $8,873 related to the lapse of the statute of limitations with respect to certain previously unrecognized tax positions.

(5) 2009 includes (a) pre-tax costs of $25,897 associated with the Company’s restructuring initiatives announced in the fourth quarter of 2008; (b) a pre-tax actuarial loss of $9,859 on pension and other postretirement plans; and (c) a tax benefit of $29,400 related to the lapse of the statute of limitations with respect to certain previously unrecognized tax positions.

(6) Stockholders’ equity per equivalent common share is calculated by dividing stockholders’ equity by the sum of common shares outstanding and the number of common shares that the Company’s Series A convertible preferred shares are convertible into for the applicable years, as such convertible preferred stock is classified within stockholders’ equity in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(7) Total capital equals interest-bearing debt (including capital leases) and stockholders' equity.

(8) Net debt and net capital are total debt (including capital leases) and total capital reduced by cash.



## PVH CORP.

## VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)

<table><tr><td>Column A</td><td>Column B</td><td colspan="3">Column C</td><td>Column D</td><td>Column E</td></tr><tr><td>Description</td><td>Balance at Beginning of Period</td><td>Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses</td><td>Additions Charged to Other Accounts</td><td>Deductions</td><td>Balance at End of Period</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended February 2, 2014</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>$ 16,114</td><td>$ 11,968</td><td>$ 3,716 (b)</td><td>$ 5,437 (c)</td><td>$ 26,361</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance/accrual for operational chargebacks and customer markdowns (a)</td><td>151,062</td><td>498,159</td><td>28,161 (b)</td><td>426,798</td><td>250,584</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>167,176</td><td>510,127</td><td>31,877</td><td>432,235</td><td>276,945</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended February 3, 2013</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>$ 15,744</td><td>$ 6,315</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 5,945 (c)</td><td>$ 16,114</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance/accrual for operational chargebacks and customer markdowns (a)</td><td>163,132</td><td>320,914</td><td>—</td><td>332,984</td><td>151,062</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>178,876</td><td>327,229</td><td>—</td><td>338,929</td><td>167,176</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended January 29, 2012</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance for doubtful accounts</td><td>$ 11,105</td><td>$ 6,332</td><td>$ —</td><td>$ 1,693 (c)</td><td>$ 15,744</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Allowance/accrual for operational chargebacks and customer markdowns (a)</td><td>161,691</td><td>337,948</td><td>—</td><td>336,507</td><td>163,132</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>172,796</td><td>344,280</td><td>—</td><td>338,200</td><td>178,876</td><td></td></tr></table>

(a) Contains activity associated with the wholesale sales allowance accrual included in accrued expenses. Please see Note 21, “Other Comments” for specified amounts.

(b) Principally due to the acquisition of Warnaco in 2013.

(c) Principally accounts written off as uncollectible, net of recoveries.



At PVH, we believe that staying true to our core values maximizes our growth potential, expands our consumer reach and brings increased value to our associates and stockholders.