Það þarf að láta þá borga til baka

Maureen Dowd skrifar í New York Times undir fyrirsögninni Disgorge, Wall Street Fat Cats:

- - -

The presidents disgust at Wall Street looters was good. But we need more. We need disgorgement.

Disgorgement is when courts force wrongdoers to repay ill-gotten gains. And Im ill at the gains gotten by scummy executives acting all Gordon Gekko while theyre getting bailed out by us.

With the equally laconic Tim Geithner beside him, Mr. Obama called it “shameful” and “the height of irresponsibility” for Wall Street bankers to give themselves $18.4 billion worth of bonuses for last year.

They should know better, he coolly chided. But big shots - even Mr. Obamas - seem impervious to knowing better. (Following fast on Geithners tax lacunae, Tom Daschles nomination hit a pothole when he had to pay $140,000 in back taxes he owed mostly for three years use of a car and a driver provided by a private equity firm.)

At least the old robber barons made great products. When you make money out of money, unmoored from morality and regulators, it must unhinge you. How else to explain corporate welfare queens partridge hunting in England, buying French jets and shopping for Lamborghinis?

Mr. Obama was less bracing than during the campaign, when A.I.G. executives were caught going to posh retreats after taking an $85 billion bailout. He called for them to be fired and to reimburse the federal Treasury. Now that he has the power to act, Mr. Obama spoke, as his spokesman Robert Gibbs put it, “like that disappointed parent that doesnt embarrass you in the mall, but you feel like youve let somebody down.”

Thats not enough, not with the president and Geithner continuing to dole out what may end up being a trillion dollars to these “malefactors of great wealth,” as Teddy Roosevelt put it.

USA Today wrote about “the A.I.G. effect:” executives finding ways to spend more discreetly, choosing lesser-known luxury hotels and $110 pinot noir instead of the $175 variety.

More than a disappointed parent, they need a special prosecutor or three. Spare the rod, spoil the jackal. Anyone who gave bonuses after accepting federal aid should be fired, and that money should be disgorged to the Treasury.

Claire McCaskill popped out a bill to limit the pay of anyone at firms taking federal money to no more than the president makes - $400,000.

“These people are idiots,” she said on the Senate floor. “You cant use taxpayer money to pay out $18 billion in bonuses. … Right now theyre on the hook to us. And they owe us something other than a fancy wastebasket and $50 million jet.”

One Obama official said her idea is catchy, but it wont work “because no one would come to Treasury to participate, and that means our economy would continue to stumble downward.”

Senator Chuck Grassley urged the administration to snatch back the bonuses. “They ought to give em back or we should go get em,” the Republican told me. “If this were Japan and a corporate executive did what is being done on Wall Street, theyd either go out and commit suicide or go before the board of directors and the country and take a very deep bow and apologize.”

He was shocked to learn that the Office of Management and Budget, insistent on following the Paperwork Reduction Act, was dragging down a special inspector generals investigation of what banks are doing with taxpayer money. (After complaints, the O.M.B. yielded on Friday.)

“Once in a while, some C.E.O. comes and talks to me and I wonder if theyre laughing under their breath at having to talk to someone who makes 1 percent of what they make,” he said.

Treasury officials and Barney Frank are dubious about recouping bonuses. “Paulson let the cat out of the bag,” Frank said of Henry Paulson, Geithners predecessor, “and it cant be gotten back.”

But arent taxpayers shareholders in these corporations now, and cant shareholders sue or scream “You misspent my money!” like Judy Holliday?

“In ‘The Solid Gold Cadillac, ” said Frank, who knows the movie.

“We got some preferred shares,” he mused, “but I dont think we could sue on that basis.”

Rudy Giuliani resurfaced Friday to defend corporate bonuses, telling CNN that cutting them would mean less spending in restaurants and stores.

Stupid. Even without bonuses, these gazillionaires can still eat out. Its like Rudys trickle-up Make Work Program: Make Leisure.

Some Obama policy makers still buy into the notion that if theyre too strict, these economic royalists, to use F.D.R.s epithet, might balk at the bailout, preferring perks over the prospect of their banks going belly-up.

The president needs to think like Andrew Cuomo. “ ‘Performance bonus for many of the C.E.O.s is an oxymoron,” he said. “I would tell them, a) you dont deserve a bonus, b) where are you going to go? and c) if you want to go, go.”