Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill — House of Lords, 2020-06-16
Topic: Government Operations
Lindsay Granshaw (Liberal Democrats, Centre to centre-left): I will speak to Amendments 71, 76, and 145, which are in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Fox These amendments all derive from the conclusions of the Delegated Powers Committee and relate to the often-unchecked powers the Government are seeking to take in the Bill. I thank that committee for its careful scrutiny of this and other Bills. As the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, said, its report is devastating. There is clearly huge concern about the powers that the Government are proposing to take in the Bill, and most of the amendments in this group address those points. For example, the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, by seeking to amend numerous places where the Government are taking powers, is challenging the Minister in each instance to justify that, and we will have to see what case the Minister makes. I also look forward to hearing what the noble Lord, Lord Blencathra, who chairs the Delegated Powers Committee, says The Government have argued that they need to act with speed because of the urgency of the coronavirus pandemic. However, many measures here will persist indefinitely, as the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, made clear. We are proposing three specific changes, recommended by the Delegated Powers Committee. As all noble Lords here will know, although it may be less well known should people outside be following these proceedings, the committee’s particular concern is with so-called Henry VIII powers, named for his supposed preference for legislating by proclamation rather than through Parliament. These powers enable Ministers to amend or repeal provisions in an Act of Parliament using secondary legislation, which is subject to very limited parliamentary scrutiny. These powers thus transfer power from Parliament to the Executive: the Government Thus, for example, the Delegated Powers Committee notes that Clause 23 confers extremely wide powers on the Secretary of State: "The powers include the power to make provision amending, or modifying the effect of, any Act of Parliament ever passed—including the Bill itself." That is an astonishing statement. The committee describes this as something that "might be called a ‘super-Henry VIII power’." We therefore propose in Amendment 71 the affirmative procedure, where regulations under Clause 23 amend primary legislation, as recommended by the committee Amendment 76 addresses Henry VIII powers in Clause 37. The Delegated Powers Committee does not accept the Government’s argument that they need to act with speed and recommends "that the affirmative procedure should apply where regulations … amend primary legislation." It outlines ways in which speed can be delivered, for example through a "made affirmative" instrument, which could come into force pending approval by both Houses within a specified period of time. Our Amendment 76 delivers the affirmative procedure In relation to Amendment 145, the Delegated Powers Committee notes: "Each of paragraphs 2, 4 and 6 of Schedule 14 confer Henry VIII powers." It emphasises that the "made affirmative" procedure could be used and points out that the Government acknowledge this in other instances elsewhere. It recommends "that the affirmative procedure should apply." Our Amendment 145 delivers that I am sure that, as ever, the Government will pay close attention to what the Delegated Powers Committee said, especially since these powers cause such disquiet across the House. They are also an especial target of those three notable lawyers, the noble and learned Lords, Lord Hope and Lord Judge, and the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, whose names often seem to represent not the stages of grief but the stages through which Governments proceed when they defend, then amend, such powers. I am sure that the Government will pay close attention to the committee’s report; I trust, therefore, that they will find all three of the amendments I have outlined here acceptable.