Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy — House of Lords, 2021-04-22
Topic: Technology
Brinley Davies (Labour, Centre-left): My Lords, this has been an interesting and important debate. I just want to make a straightforward point on what appears in section IV of the review, "Strategic Framework" Under "Sustaining strategic advantage through science and technology", the review refers to "The rapid pace of change in science and technology" that is "transforming many aspects of our lives, fundamentally reshaping our economy and our society, and unlocking previously inconceivable improvements in global health, well-being and prosperity." So far, so good; soft power is of crucial importance in maintaining our security. However, it then goes on to refer to "systematic competition" between states and claims, somewhat tautologically, that "countries which establish a leading role in critical and emerging technologies will be at the forefront of global leadership." The emphasis on the importance of science, and health in particular, is correct. We know this from the acknowledged success of developing and delivering the Covid-19 vaccine programme, which is so important in our return to anything like a normal life. However, the emphasis on competition in this context is simply wrong. Again, we know this from the vaccine programme, where co-operation between actors, public and private, from many different parts of the world, has been crucial to its success. It is a truly international effort, where co-operation, not competition, has been the foundation Unfortunately, this is part and parcel of the Prime Minister’s global Britain rhetoric—just sound and wind, with no substance. When he attributed the vaccine’s success to capitalism and greed, he was wrong. The idea that private ingenuity and naked competition produced the vaccines is a complete fantasy. The infrastructure that produced Covid-19 vaccines was nurtured in publicly funded universities, public institutes and heavily subsidised private labs The review itself demonstrates this lack of understanding of how science works. It claims that the UK is already a science and technology power, with references to "the UK’s successful S&T base." It then fails to explore the basis for that success in any detail, because to do so would expose the Government’s mis-steps in this field A clear example of this is the Government’s wishful thinking in the box headed "Attracting global talent to the UK". Having the right ambitions, appointing an office for talent, and relying on a yet-to-be-revealed, points-based immigration system are not enough, in practice, to provide the reassurance that top talent requires. It is not just about Brexit, but that hardly helped The Government also fail to provide the money to back up their claims. Having lofty ambitions is of nothing when insufficient resources are provided for our leading research institutions. The recovery from Covid will need research, for example on the mental health effects, in order to offer the better treatments and services that are needed In his introduction, the Minister acknowledged the importance of co-operation in the field of science. This is particularly important when it comes to health research. Co-operation is the way forward, not competition.