Persistent Rough Sleeping in Nottingham — House of Commons, 2018-07-02
Topic: Housing
Lilian Rachel Greenwood (Labour, Centre-left): The hon. Gentleman is quite right that this is about providing people with not just a home, but the means by which they can sustain themselves in a home The reasons for the increased numbers are far from a mystery. Crisis cites the impact of welfare reform, rising rents and the housing crisis. People become homeless and sleep rough for many reasons, but the single biggest cause of statutory homelessness is now the end of an assured shorthold tenancy. The cost of private rented accommodation has risen three times faster than earnings in England since 2010, and real earnings are still lagging behind 2008 levels a decade on. Although I firmly believe that the Government bear a great deal of responsibility for the rise in homelessness and fear that their target of halving rough sleeping over the course of the Parliament and eliminating it altogether by 2027 lacks the urgency that the situation demands, I do very much welcome the Homelessness Reduction Act 2018 and the Government’s decision to develop the national rough sleeping strategy. My reason for seeking tonight’s debate is to address the content of that strategy Concern about rising levels of rough sleeping in Nottingham was one of the drivers behind a new investigation commissioned jointly by Framework Housing Association and Opportunity Nottingham, the Big Lottery-funded programme supporting people with multiple needs. "No Way Out: A Study of Persistent Rough Sleeping in Nottingham" was produced by Dr Graham Bowpitt from Nottingham Trent University and Karan Kaur from Opportunity Nottingham, with help from Nottingham’s street outreach team The study sought to discover how far the recent increase in rough sleeping might have arisen "not just from more people coming on to the streets, but also from people remaining there longer or repeatedly" It sought to identify "the characteristics that distinguish persistent rough sleepers from the wider street homeless population, and any common features in their circumstances that might help to explain persistence." In the remainder of my speech, I will focus on the study’s key findings before commenting on wider issues in Nottingham and at a national level For the purposes of the report, and therefore this debate, the definition of persistent rough sleeper is "someone who was recorded sleeping rough on at least 10% of nights between 1st April 2016 and 31st March 2017, i.e. 36 nights (the ‘sustained’), or who has been seen sleeping rough in at least three out of the six years between 2012 and 2017 (the ‘recurrent’)." The report says: "There were 72 persistent rough sleepers who met the above definition…7 who were both sustained and recurrent, 33 who were sustained and 32 who were recurrent. Of these…10 were women…and 62 men…58 were recorded as of White British ethnicity...most of the others being White (Other)…13 were recorded as having a disability (18%)." According to the report, Opportunity Nottingham’s beneficiaries are recruited to the programme because they are assessed as having "at least three of the four prescribed complex needs: homelessness, substance misuse, mental ill-health and offending." Of the 72 persistent rough sleepers, 67—that is 93%—had problems with substance misuse. Some 49 were offenders or at risk of offending, and more than half had mental health problems.