House of Lords: Remote Participation and Hybrid Sittings — House of Lords, 2021-05-20
Topic: Government Operations
Michael John Dobbs (Conservative, Centre-right): My Lords, this is proving to be an elegant and most useful debate—the sort of debate, frankly, that I have missed. We have been kept apart too long. Like my noble friend, and roommate, Lord Forsyth, I believe that Parliament is an essential service, but we are told that we could not come back earlier because we were too old. Now it seems that we cannot come back fully because our staff are too young. It is about time that we sorted ourselves out I do not accept all the statistics thrown at us about how many votes we have had and how well they show we have done. Virtual participation and voting have become largely meaningless and they have left us open to lots of abuse. I quote: "Peers vote in droves … Peers claimed almost £1m in taxpayer-funded ‘attendance’ allowances while working from home." So says the Times. It continues: "Since the rules were changed … participation has soared to record levels." The Times does not like us, nor does the Daily Mail. It says: "Lords a-leaping to vote from home after being allowed to claim £162-per day." Not even the Telegraph likes us, one headline stating: "Lords up their voting as they claim virtual attendance rates." These accusations are incredibly damaging. We do not have many friends left, and we need friends. I cannot think that Downing Street looks on us with much favour, not after the House’s extravagant show of belligerence over Brexit. We have lost many former friends in the House of Commons too. Where shall we find the friends whom in these turbulent times we desperately need The press attack us constantly: "Drunk as Lords. House of Lords spend nearly £2million on booze in the past five years" screamed the Sun recently. There have been references to "the same old snouts in the trough" and: "The unelected House of Lords is a corrupting influence at the heart of Westminster"— that is what people have read in the Daily Mail and the Daily Express, and I have not even got close to the Guardian and the Mirror. We have become a laughing stock in many eyes, and perhaps deservedly so when it comes to the wretched "Valuing Everyone" training. Is it not about time we started valuing ourselves? When are we going to stand up and say that we believe we do an incredibly important job and do it well? If we lurk in the shadows, as we have been doing, we will simply wither away As my noble friend Lord Howe and many others have said, we need to return to full physical debate and physical voting. We keep hearing that this is a business. It is not a business. We are not employed. This place is unique, and it is important I know that there will be many claims for exemption on the grounds of individual hardship. I listened carefully to the noble Baroness, Lady Campbell of Surbiton, as I always do, and we need to consider very carefully what she has said, but I still have ringing in my ears the accusations that we are being paid for voting from the comfort of our own homes and gardens. Whatever else we do, we must bring an end to these accusations of "deckchair Divisions" Being a Peer is a huge privilege. It carries with it some pretty unselfish responsibilities. We are here to serve this House—not the other way around. It is on that basis that I believe we should move forward.