Issue:
Bug: refactor(cypress): BOA testcases are failing due to failed assertions of Refunds and Connector Agnostic





Pull request description:
## Type of Change
<!-- Put an `x` in the boxes that apply -->

- [ ] Bugfix
- [ ] New feature
- [ ] Enhancement
- [x] Refactoring
- [ ] Dependency updates
- [ ] Documentation
- [x] CI/CD

## Description
<!-- Describe your changes in detail -->
Refunds for Manually Captured No3DS Payments and Connector Agnostic NTID Test Cases in Cypress were failing for `Bank of America` Payment Processor. 
- The Refunds for Manually Captured No3DS Payments were staying in `pending` status instead of `succeeded` with `error_message` as `null` and on RSync, it yields `errorInformation.message` as `"Request was processed successfully."` with status still as `pending`.
- The `00024-ConnectorAgnosticNTID` was failing with the error message in the response as `"No eligible connector was found for the current payment method configuration"` because it did not support Connector Agnostic.

So, made the following changes:-
- Mapped the status accordingly. Changed `succeeded` to `pending` for No3DS Manual Payment Refunds.
- Excluded `bankofamerica` from the Connectors which are allowing Connector Agnostic.


### Additional Changes

- [ ] This PR modifies the API contract
- [ ] This PR modifies the database schema
- [ ] This PR modifies application configuration/environment variables

<!--
Provide links to the files with corresponding changes.

Following are the paths where you can find config files:
1. `config`
2. `crates/router/src/configs`
3. `loadtest/config`
-->


## Motivation and Context
<!--
Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.

If you don't have an issue, we'd recommend starting with one first so the PR
can focus on the implementation (unless it is an obvious bug or documentation fix
that will have little conversation).
-->
Bank of America Cypress Test Cases were failing.

## How did you test it?
<!--
Did you write an integration/unit/API test to verify the code changes?
Or did you test this change manually (provide relevant screenshots)?
-->

<img width="718" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/440774ed-944e-4a10-8447-4fa75e05e915" />

_(Tested on Integ Environment)_

## Checklist
<!-- Put an `x` in the boxes that apply -->

- [ ] I formatted the code `cargo +nightly fmt --all`
- [ ] I addressed lints thrown by `cargo clippy`
- [ ] I reviewed the submitted code
- [ ] I added unit tests for my changes where possible


Testing:


<img width="718" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/440774ed-944e-4a10-8447-4fa75e05e915" />

_(Tested on Integ Environment)_

Patch: