TITLE: A Comparison of Betamethasone Valerate 0.1% Cream Twice Daily Plus Oral Simvastatin Versus Betamethasone Valerate 0.1% Cream Alone in the Treatment of Vitiligo Patients

  ABSTRACT.BACKGROUND:
Vitiligo, a common disorder of depigmentation, is often difficult to treat. Corticosteroids are known to be effective, but with modest results. Although simvastatin has been reported to be effective for immunorelated dermatologic disorders including vitiligo, controlled trials are lacking. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of topical betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream (as a standard method of treatment for vitiligo) versus a combination of betamethasone valerate plus oral simvastatin in the treatment of vitiligo.

ABSTRACT.MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Eighty-eight subjects with symmetric vitiligo who had body surface involvement up to 20% were divided randomly into two groups. Group A were treated with betamethasone valerate 01% cream twice daily and Group B with betamethasone valerate 01% cream twice daily and oral simvastatin 80 mg daily for 12 weeks. Finally, 46 patients completed treatment after 12 weeks in both groups. The results were evaluated by a blind dermatologist using Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) score at baseline, 4th, 8th, and 12th week of treatment. In a similar way, subjective assessment performed by patients based on photo evaluation at the end of the study.

ABSTRACT.RESULTS:
Despite a continuous reduction in VASI score in both groups, according to both physician (P = 0.13) and patient (P = 0.374) assessment oral simvastatin was not statistically more effective than conventional treatment of vitiligo.

ABSTRACT.CONCLUSION:
This study indicates that oral simvastatin is not associated with significant impacts in the treatment of vitiligo as compared to other inflammatory dermatologic conditions such as psoriasis. Indeed, other studies should be initiated regarding exact molecular and cellular effects of statins in the treatment of vitiligo.

BODY.INTRODUCTION:
Vitiligo is an acquired pigmentary disorder, with a word wide distribution.[1] Although it commonly affects 0.5–2% of the population,[1] based on the epidemiologic reports from Gujarat, India, prevalence up to 8.8% has also been recorded.[2] The average age of onset is around 20 years, but any age may be affected.[1] Although men and women are equally involved,[34] the mean peak of involvement in female patients occurs in younger ages.[4] In its common form, vitiligo presents as uniformly depigmented macules or patches with convex borders surrounded by normal skin.[1] The cutaneous macules of vitiligo commonly affect normally hyperpigmented areas of the body, including the face, the dorsal surface of the hands, nipples, axillae, umbilicus, sacrum, and genital regions, but can occur anywhere.[1] Developing of lesions in areas of friction indicates koebnerization is common.[5]  Despite the fact that the exact etiology of vitiligo is unknown, the more accepted idea is that vitiligo represents a group of various pathophysiologic etiologies. Among many speculations attempting to demonstrate the pathogenesis of the disease, the autoimmune hypothesis is the most popular.[6] The other suggested etiologies include neural, biochemical, and genetic hypotheses.[7] The common pathway of different etiologic factors end in the reduction of melanocyte survival.[8]  Due to the fact that cosmetic disfigurement and psychological burden of the disease is noticeable, patients frequently seek medical treatment. Although numerous modalities have been introduced, the treatment of vitiligo remains frustrating for dermatologists. Among various options, phototherapy, and topical corticosteroid therapy are the cornerstone of treatment. Following treatment with the latter, a reduction in antibody-mediated cytotoxicity against melanocytes has been detected.[9]  Regarding the proposed leading immunomodulatory role of statins over the past 2 decades,[1011121314] researches on the potential aspects of the use of these drugs for dermatologic disorders including systemic sclerosis, bullous pemphigoid, alopecia areata, vitiligo, lichen planus, psoriasis, and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been commenced.[1516] Recently, a randomized control trial showed a remarkable benefit of adding oral simvastatin in the treatment of psoriasis.[17]  Despite the suggested therapeutic potential of statins in the treatment of vitiligo, no clinical trial has still been conducted. This study is the first, to our knowledge, to measure quantitatively the added effect of oral simvastatin to the conventional treatment of vitiligo with topical corticosteroids. Both have no significant adverse effects.

BODY.MATERIALS AND METHODS:
This randomized, controlled trial was conducted on patients with vitiligo referring to the outpatient Department of Dermatology of Alzahra Hospital in Isfahan (Iran), during April 2012 to February 2013. Patients included to in this study were subjects of 20–60 years old, with a body surface area involvement of <20%. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Research Project Number was 39127.  The diagnosis was established on the basis of clinical findings. Patients were divided into two different treatment groups, using a table of random numbers. Inclusion criteria included any new case of vitiligo, aged between 20 and 60 years, with a body surface area involvement of <20%. Patients with leucoderma secondary to other causes, segmental or zosteriform vitiligo, lesions unresponsive to treatment after 8th week of treatment, pregnancy and lactation, impaired kidney function, significant liver function abnormalities, hepatitis, cirrhosis, and those on mandatory therapy with medications that inhibit CYP3A4 pathways (erythromycin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, azole antifungals, calcium channel blockers, cimetidine, amiodarone, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) were excluded from the study.  Despite the fact that most vitiligo patients are healthy, detailed history was taken from each patient concerning possible associated situations (Graves' disease, Hashimotos' thyroiditis, Addison's disease, pernicious anemia, autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome, halo nevi, alopecia areata, and lichen sclerous).  With regard to type I error (alpha) = 0.05, study power = 80%, and expected difference of 30% in response rate, the sample size was calculated as 44 subjects in each group. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Research Project Number was 39217.  After an initial screening visit, this double-blind clinical trial was initiated with 88 eligible subjects (aged 20–59 years). The patients were divided into two different treatment groups, using a table of random numbers. Finally, 46 patients with surface area involvement of <20% completed treatment modality. Thirty-nine subjects excluded from the study due to the persistence of lesions after the 8th week of treatment or aggravation of lesions and 3 subjects were not willing to complete the study.  In each group, 44 patients for 12 weeks of treatment were enrolled in the study. The patients in Group A received betamethasone valerate cream 0.1% twice daily; and the patients in Group B received betamethasone valerate cream 0.1% twice daily similarly plus simvastatin at the dose of 40 mg two times daily. The duration of treatment was 12 weeks in both groups [Figure 1].  Figure 1Flow chart of the treatment in the 2 groups  The severity of vitiligo was evaluated by a physician blinded to treatment identifications before the initiation of the treatment and at the end of 4th, 8th, and 12th week of treatment using Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). According to this method, VASI is calculated as below:  VASI: Σ(Hand units) × (Residual depigmentation [%])  A hand unit is considered the volar hand including fingers.[18] At 100% depigmentation, no pigment is present; at 90%, specks of pigment are present; at 75%, the depigmented aea exceeds the pigmented area; at 50%, the depigmented and pigmented areas are equal; at 25%, the pigmented area exceeds the depigmented area; and at 10%, only depigmentation are present.[19]  The patients were advised to report the occurrence of any unwilling adverse effects (redness, burning, itching, and erosion) during the 12 weeks of the study.  Evaluation of improvement and side effects were conducted at baseline and 4th, 8th, and 12th week of treatment. In each visit, digital photographs were taken by a facial photo fixture using a Canon PowerShot G12 stand-off camera.  In order to evaluate patient satisfaction surveys, assessment of the treatment areas using comparative photographs were conducted by patient based satisfaction, and 12 weeks after starting of treatment (Patient Global Assessment).[20]  The improvement of vitiligo was scored by a quartile grading scale – mild: <25%, moderate: 25–50%, good: 51–75%, and excellent response: 76–100%.[19]  Laboratory tests including a check of serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase, creatine phosphokinase and also liver function tests performed in all patients at the beginning and the end of the treatment.  The statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS version 18.0 for Windows software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) by using Chi-square, Mann–Whitney, and repeated measures ANOVA analyses. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.

BODY.RESULTS:
Eighty-eight subjects (100%) with a body surface area involvement of <20% were recruited in the study. At the end of study 42 subjects failed to complete the study. Thirty-nine subjects (23 subjects in Group A and 16 subjects in Group B) excluded from the study due to persistence of lesions after 8th week of treatment or aggravation of lesions and 3 subjects (2 subjects in Group A and 1 subject in Group B) gave up the study due to scheduling difficulties.  The mean age of patients was 35.7 ± 10.5 years in Group A and 36.5 ± 10.2 years in Group B. The difference in mean ages of the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.75). Group A included 24 (45%) female and 20 (54.5%) male patients. Group B included 21 (47.7%) female and 23 (52.3%) male patients. There was no significant difference between sex ratios in the two groups (P = 0.52).  By Chi-square test, the distribution of vitiligo patches between two groups (P = 0.776) was not statistically significant between them [Table 1].   Table 1 Patient characteristic of betamethasone valerate versus betamethasone valerate plus oral simvastatin group   Patient satisfaction survey at the end of the study revealed that of patients in Group A, 31.6% (6 out of 19) rated themselves as having <25% of overall improvement, 52.6% (10 out of 19) judged themselves as having 25–50% improvement and 15.8% (3 out of 19) rated improvement of 50–75%. Nobody reported improvement of more than 75% (excellent).  Both total number of patients with improvement and the number of subjects with more than 50% were increased in Group B [Table 2].  Table 2 Vitiligo parameters betamethasone cream and betamethasone cream plus oral simvastatin group   Despite the steadily decrease in mean VASI value in both groups by means of repeated measure ANOVA test, Mann–Whitney analysis revealed no significantly greater improvement of depigmented patches according to clinician's (P = 0.1) and patient satisfaction assessment (P = 0.14) at the end of study in patients of Group B.  In a similar way, the results of dermatologist assessment at the end of 4th (P = 0.98) and 8th (P = 0.89) week of treatment confirmed the aforementioned final results. By considering the clinical response with repigmentation >50%, greater number of subjects in Group B have been improved at the end of 4th (7% vs. 0%), 8th (22% vs. 15.4%), and 12th (37% vs. 26.3%) week of treatment. However, Mann–Whitney test is used because of nonnormal frequency distributions. It detected no significant difference between groups in all stages of evaluation.  No side effect or any laboratory abnormality has been detected in both groups.

BODY.DISCUSSION:
Although topical corticosteroids along with phototherapy are the mainstay of treatment of vitiligo, the overall outcome still remains modest.[21] Indeed, an interest for finding a cheap, safe, and common treatment is unstopping.  With regard to the more accepted role of autoimmune factors in the pathogenesis of vitiligo, investigators turn their attention to the drugs with immunomodulatory activities. In fact, nonsegmental vitiligo as the more common form of the disease is primarily affected by the autoimmune factors.[6] In this model, the main effector cell is CD8+ T cell that depends on the action of both interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and chemokine receptors, especially CCR3.[16]  Other than inhibiting of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl CoA, another convincing mechanisms by which statins are therapeutic, are anti-inflammatory properties.[10] By means of flow cytometry, it was shown that simvastatin are direct inhibitors of IFN-γ. Furthermore, statins downregulate the Th1-type chemokine receptors including CCR5 and CCR3.[22]  In the present study to our knowledge, we provide the first clinical evidence that measures quantitatively the effectiveness of oral simvastatin in the treatment of vitiligo. Considering the effectiveness of topical corticosteroids according to current data in vitiligo, betamethasone valerate cream as class III corticosteroid, was given to all patients.[192324]  Topical corticosteroids included among the most compelling approaches for small, localized vitiligo.[9] Despite the primary recommendations on the use of Class III and IV of corticosteroids, recent publications propose that even Class I can be used with good results in an intermittent manner to minimize side effects.[1] The reported efficacy of corticosteroid varying from one study to another (ranging from 30% to 80%) indicating a different response.[2325] In cases that there was not response after 2 months of therapy, to minimize the possible side effects, treatment should be halted.[1]  In our study, 26.3% (5 out of 19) of our patients in Group A (reflecting only the effect of corticosteroid) revealed >50% regimentation, which is near to the lower limit of response in the statistics of literature. The lower response rate may reflect the small number of subjects in our study. Moreover, by eliminating children from the study, a population group with better responses in comparison with adults, was excluded.[24]  Despite the greater number of patients with improvement more than 50% greater in subjects of Group B (37% vs. 26.3%), by statistical analysis no significance difference between two groups at the end of study was detected. In other words, oral simvastatin was not accompanied by remarkable effects in the treatment of vitiligo.  Following explanation relevant documents on the immunomodulatory effects of statins in the treatment of dermatologic disease,[16] Wolkenstein et al. has noticed the diminished risk of psoriasis associated with statin intake.[26] In another study Naseri et al., evaluated the efficacy of oral simvastatin on improvement of psoriasis.[17] This paper has shown significantly more reduction of Psoriasis Area Severity Index score in the group received oral simvastatin compared to group who did not (P = 0.001).  Concerning vitiligo, only in one case study by Noël et al., a clear regression of skin's depigmentation was observed in a 55-year-old man with vitiligo who received simvastatin. After the cessation of simvastatin, his vitiligo lesions relapsed. He was retreated with simvastatin which resulted in reallevation of his disease.[27]  In comparison to aforementioned studies on the beneficial impact of simvastatin in psoriasis and inflammatory conditions, the number of patients with remarkable response in our study was much less. This difference in response could be because of some limitations. It is now proven that vitiligo represent a group of heterozygous pathophysiologic disorders with the same characteristics. Despite the fact that autoimmune mechanisms are considered the main cause of generalized vitiligo, the role of neurohumoral, cytotoxic, and genetic factors is not insignificant.[7] In other words, considering autoimmune factors as the only underlying cause of all forms of generalized vitiligo is not logical. Furthermore, pathway alteration of the Th1/Th2 balance and inhibition of lymphocyte migration are the conjectural actions of simvastatin in vitiligo. However, inhibition of Th17 cell induction and interleukin-17 production, inhibition of mast cell degranulation, and induction of angiogenesis which are attributable to statins,[16] are not considered to be involved in improving vitiligo.  In addition, childhood vitiligo better responds to therapy compared with the adult.[23] Excluding children from the study thus have affected the results, and underscores the clinical relevance of the pigmentory induction capacities of the treatment protocol. In determining the limitations of study, if we excluded subjects with rapidly spreading vitiligo, and those with lesions on areas known to be recalcitrant to therapy, fewer subjects would drop out of the study. Moreover, most of the studies regarding evaluation the effectiveness of a given therapy defined for 8 weeks. Considering that lesions unresponsive to corticosteroids after 8th week of treatment should be excluded, if we defined the study for 8 weeks, more subjects would remain at the end of the study.

BODY.CONCLUSION:
In summary, despite the continuous improvement of disease by therapy, adding of simvastatin was not statistically associated with significant effects. With regard to the discovery of immunomodulatory effects of simvastatin through studies of organ transplant patients, caution should be performed when considering definite immunorelated disorders such as vitiligo. Moreover, parallel experiments should be initiated regarding exact molecular and cellular effects of statins in the treatment of vitiligo.

BODY.CONCLUSION.FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND SPONSORSHIP:
Nil.

BODY.CONCLUSION.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
There are no conflicts of interest.

Question: Compared to Topical betamethasone valerate cream (Group A) what was the result of Betamethasone valerate cream plus oral simvastatin (Group B) on Rate of side effects or laboratory abnormalities?
Evidence: Despite a continuous reduction in VASI score in both groups, according to both physician (P = 0.13) and patient (P = 0.374) assessment oral simvastatin was not statistically more effective than conventional treatment of vitiligo.
Answer: no significant difference