TITLE: The influence of a long-term growth hormone treatment on lipid and glucose metabolism: a randomized trial in short Japanese children born small for gestational age

  ABSTRACT.BACKGROUND:
Long-term growth hormone (GH) treatments in short children born small for gestational age (SGA) restore lipid metabolism, but also increase insulin resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of long-term GH therapy on lipid and glucose metabolism as well as its dose dependency in short Japanese children born SGA.

ABSTRACT.METHODS:
Eighty Japanese children with a short stature who were born SGA participated in this study; 65 were treated with fixed GH doses of 0.033 (low) or 0.067 (high) mg/kg/day for 260 weeks; 15 were untreated controls in the first year and were randomized to one of the two treatment groups at week 52. Serum cholesterol, glucose and insulin levels were regularly measured. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted annually.

ABSTRACT.RESULTS:
The mean age at the start of GH therapy was approximately 5.3 years. Serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the high dose group significantly decreased over time during GH therapy. In both dose groups for TC, and in the high dose group for LDL-C, the higher the baseline values, the greater the decrease after 260 weeks. The rate of the decrease observed after 260 weeks in patients with high LDL-C levels was greater in the high dose group. Based on the results of OGTT, no patient was classified as being diabetic; however, annual increases were observed in post-OGTT insulin levels. After 260 weeks, the homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) increased, suggesting that insulin resistance developed over time with the GH treatment, while 36.6 % of the subjects entered puberty.

ABSTRACT.CONCLUSIONS:
Long-term continuous GH treatment for children born SGA may have a potentially beneficial effect on several parameters in lipid metabolism and does not adversely affect glucose metabolism.

ABSTRACT.TRIAL REGISTRATION:
GHLIQUID-1516, GHLIQUID-1517, Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical trial registration: JapicCTI-050132. Registered 13 September 2005. Retrospectively registered. JapicCTI-050137. Registered 13 September 2005. Retrospectively registered. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration: NCT00184717. Registered 13 September 2005. Retrospectively registered.

BODY.BACKGROUND:
Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as birth weight and length below the 10th percentile for gestational age in Japan [1]. Approximately 10 % of children born SGA will not achieve catch-up growth by 2 years of age, and will remain short throughout their lives if left untreated [2–4].  A previous study reported that low birth weight was associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in adulthood [5]. Furthermore, rapid catch-up in the weight of these children has been suggested to increase the risk of various medical conditions [6, 7].  The mechanisms underlying these risks have been examined, with increases in insulin resistance and/or intra-abdominal fat being implicated in this phenomenon [8]. Increases in insulin resistance may cause impairments in the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein axis or be a consequence of these impairments [9].  GH treatments have been approved for the treatment of children with short stature born SGA without spontaneous catch-up growth. GH therapy has been suggested to provide additional, long-term metabolic benefits, thereby mitigating the metabolic consequences of being born SGA, while still facilitating early age-appropriate catch-up growth [10]. On the other hand, GH treatments have been reported to increase insulin resistance with the over-secretion of insulin occurring to compensate.  This was a 260 week (5 year) clinical study investigating the effect of long-term GH therapy in Japanese patients with SGA-related short stature. Height efficacy and safety data [11] and the beneficial effects on metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) [12] in these patients have been reported previously. In the present analysis, we examined the relationship between baseline status and changes of lipid metabolism-associated parameters after long-term (260 weeks) GH therapy, in addition to effects on other metabolic parameters including glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood glucose and insulin levels before and after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and insulinogenic index.

BODY.METHODS.PATIENTS:
The study population comprised 80 short children born SGA, aged 3–8 years, who were randomly assigned to two groups receiving a low or high dose (0.033 or 0.067 mg/kg/day) of GH (n = 31 and 34, respectively). A control group (no treatment, n = 15) was established during the first 52 weeks (1 year) and compared with the GH therapy groups. Patients from the control group were randomized to one of the treatment groups at week 52. Further details concerning inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described previously [11].

BODY.METHODS.STUDY PREPARATIONS:
Packaging of trial products were indistinguishable from one another and the doctors and the patients were blinded to their group allocation. Both GH doses were injected using a GH injection device (NordiPen® 5 and PenNeedle®; Novo Nordisk A/S) to maintain blinding.

BODY.METHODS.STUDY DESIGN:
This study involved a 156-week extension of a 104-week (260 weeks in total) multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial investigating the efficacy and safety of two doses of GH. In patients assigned to receive long-term GH therapy, GH was subcutaneously injected daily before bedtime. In those assigned to the control group (52 weeks), follow-up alone was performed without GH. The trial was performed between July 2003 and December 2009. Patient visits were planned at 13-week intervals with a ±14-day window, and 15 visits were scheduled over the course of the 260-week trial.  Metabolic parameters assessed included: TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, HbA1c, blood glucose and insulin levels before and after an OGTT, HOMA-IR, and insulinogenic index (Δinsulin 0–30 min/Δglucose 0–30 min).  On the basis of the results of OGTT (1.75 g/kg, maximum 75 g), individual patients were classified into three types: normal, glucose intolerant, and diabetic, according to the criteria for hyperglycemia established by the Japan Diabetes Society [13, 14]. Patients were categorized as glucose intolerant if they had a fasting blood glucose level of 110–125 mg/dL and/or a value of 140–199 mg/dL at 120 min after OGTT, or a blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL or more 60 min after OGTT. Changes in body weight and body mass index (BMI) SDS were also reported.

BODY.METHODS.STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Summary statistics (mean with SD) were calculated for baseline patient demographics. A closed testing procedure was applied for analyses at 52 weeks since two hypotheses (low or high dose group vs. no treatment group) were tested at 52 weeks. Changes from baseline for the parameters of lipid metabolism were analyzed using a 2-sided t-test based on t-distribution for each treatment group. A significance level of 5 % was used, and confidence intervals (CI) were constructed with a confidence coefficient of 95 %. Simple correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline and change in the parameters of lipid metabolism, between HOMA-IR and BMI SDS at 260 weeks, and between HbA1c and BMI SDS at 260 weeks.

BODY.RESULTS.PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS:
Baseline patient demographics are outlined in Tables 1 and 2. No significant differences were observed in patient backgrounds at baseline among the three groups; however, the proportion of boys was higher in the low and high dose groups than in the no treatment group. At treatment start, the mean age, height SDS, and IGF-I SDS were approximately 5.3 years, –3.0, and –0.7, respectively.Table 1Patient demographics [Mean ± SD]No treatment0.033 mg/kg/day0.067 mg/kg/daynnnGender153134 Male, %46.7764.52058.820 Female, %53.3835.51141.214Chronological age, years5.32 ± 1.38155.34 ± 1.46315.27 ± 1.1534Height, cm94.6 ± 8.61595.9 ± 8.43194.9 ± 7.334Height SDS-2.92 ± 0.5315-2.95 ± 0.6431-2.90 ± 0.6734BMI14.07 ± 1.401514.42 ± 1.263114.16 ± 1.2434IGF-I, ng/mL115.39 ± 51.0115117.25 ± 49.1331118.20 ± 49.1034IGF-I SDS-1.03 ± 1.5015-0.75 ± 1.0631-0.63 ± 1.2134Insulin, μU/mL2.6 ± 1.7103.6 ± 2.1263.2 ± 1.928Glucose, mg/dL79.8 ± 6.31582.4 ± 10.43178.2 ± 11.534HbA1c (NGSP), %5.08 ± 0.32155.10 ± 0.29315.00 ± 0.1934TC, mg/dL173.5 ± 24.215166.9 ± 29.831181.4 ± 24.234LDL-C, mg/dL96.7 ± 18.91594.8 ± 26.231104.7 ± 25.034HDL-C, mg/dL60.4 ± 15.91556.9 ± 9.63161.9 ± 12.034
SD standard deviation, SDS standard deviation score, BMI body mass index, IGF-I insulin-like growth factor-1, HbA
1c glycated hemoglobin A1c, NGSP National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, TC total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Table 2Patient numbers evaluated as being the glucose intolerant type of diabetes mellitus [n (%)]0.033 mg/kg/day0.067 mg/kg/dayTotalGlucose intolerant typeTime point evaluated as the glucose intolerant typeTotalGlucose intolerant typeTime point evaluated as the glucose intolerant typeBefore60 mina
120 minBefore60 min*120 minBaseline31 (100 %)3 (9.7 %)1 (3.2 %)0 (0.0 %)2 (6.5 %)34 (100 %)1 (2.9 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)1 (2.9 %)52 weeks29 (100 %)3 (10.3 %)0 (0.0 %)2 (6.9 %)1 (3.4 %)34 (100 %)3 (8.8 %)0 (0.0 %)3 (8.8 %)0 (0.0 %)104 weeks29 (100 %)2 (6.9 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)2 (6.9 %)32 (100 %)2 (6.3 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)2 (6.3 %)156 weeks25 (100 %)1 (4.0 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)1 (4.0 %)29 (100 %)2 (6.9 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)2 (6.9 %)208 weeks25 (100 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)28 (100 %)3 (10.7 %)0 (0.0 %)2 (7.1 %)1 (3.6 %)260 weeks23 (100 %)1 (4.3 %)1 (4.3 %)0 (0.0 %)0 (0.0 %)27 (100 %)4 (14.8 %)0 (0.0 %)1 (3.7 %)3 (11.1 %)
aPatients with a blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL or more 60 min after OGTT were regarded as being glucose intolerant [14]. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test


BODY.RESULTS.INFLUENCE ON LIPID METABOLISM:
We analyzed lipid parameters at the start of GH therapy and after 260 weeks. In the low dose group, no significant differences were noted in the mean TC and LDL-C levels between the two time points (Fig. 1a and b, respectively). In the high dose group, a significant decrease was observed after 260 weeks (p < 0.0005 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In the low dose group, the mean HDL-C level after 260 weeks was significantly higher than at the start of GH therapy (p < 0.05, Fig. 1c), whereas no significant difference was found in the high dose group.Fig. 1(a) TC, (b) LDL-C, and (c) HDL-C values at baseline and week 260. TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
  Correlations between the baseline values and changes from baseline to 260 weeks in TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C levels are shown in Fig. 2. Changes in TC levels were negatively correlated with baseline values in the two dose groups (Fig. 2a). A similar correlation was observed between LDL-C levels at the start of GH therapy and the change noted after 260 weeks (Fig. 2b). This correlation was particularly strong in the high dose group. No correlation was detected between HDL-C levels at the start of GH therapy and the change noted after 260 weeks in either group (Fig. 2c).Fig. 2Scatter plots of (a) TC, (b) LDL-C, and (c) HDL-C values at baseline, and changes from baseline to week 260. TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol


BODY.RESULTS.INFLUENCE ON GLUCOSE METABOLISM:
In the two dose groups, HbA1c (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program [NGSP]) values increased until 104 weeks after the start of GH therapy, and remained constant thereafter (Fig. 3). In the low and high dose groups, the mean HbA1c values at 260 weeks after the start of GH therapy were 5.29 and 5.33 %, respectively, which were within the normal range (4.6–6.2 %). Furthermore, no patient showed an HbA1c value beyond the standard value range during the study period (260 weeks).Fig. 3HbA1c (NGSP) during the study period. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; NGSP, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program
  No marked changes were noted in the blood glucose response to OGTT during 260 weeks of the treatment in either group (Fig. 4). Regarding the influence of long-term GH therapy on insulin levels after OGTT, the peak value in the high dose group was slightly higher than that in the low dose group (Fig. 5).Fig. 4Changes in glucose after OGTT. a 0.033 mg/kg/day; b 0.067 mg/kg/day. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
Fig. 5Changes in insulin after OGTT. a 0.033 mg/kg/day; b 0.067 mg/kg/day. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
  Although no marked changes were observed in fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c values slightly increased from 5.10 to 5.29 % and from 5.00 to 5.33 % in the low and high dose groups, respectively. Two patients were classified as being glucose intolerant based on fasting blood glucose levels. GH therapy had not been administered to one of these patients. In the low and high dose groups, 95.7 and 85.2 % of patients were classified as being normal 260 weeks after the start of GH therapy, respectively. No patients were classified as being diabetic at any observation point.  An increase was noted in the mean HOMA-IR 260 weeks after the start of GH therapy (Table 3). However, no significant difference was noted in this increase that was related to the dose administered. Twenty-two patients (36.6 %) entered puberty during the study period (7 [35 %] in the low dose group and 15 [37.5 %] in the high dose group).Table 3HOMA-IR [Mean ± SD]0.033 mg/kg/dayn = 200.067 mg/kg/dayn = 16Baseline0.720 ± 0.4650.646 ± 0.498260 weeks2.154 ± 1.6821.895 ± 1.197
SD standard deviation, HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment as an index of insulin resistance
  No correlations were found between the HOMA-IR and BMI SDS or between the HbA1c and BMI SDS after 260 weeks of GH therapy (data not shown).  After 260 weeks of GH therapy, the insulinogenic index increased from 0.45 to 1.31 and 0.52 to 1.24 in the low and high dose groups, respectively; however, no dose-related differences were observed.

BODY.RESULTS.WITHDRAWALS:
Two patients discontinued treatment and withdrew from the study. One patient from the 0.033 mg/kg/day group withdrew after 151 weeks due to IgA nephropathy. The event was classed as a serious adverse event, moderate in severity and assessed as possibly related to trial product. One patient from the no treatment group/0.033 mg/kg/day withdrew after 212 weeks due to hyperinsulinemia. The event was mild in severity and assessed as possibly related to trial product.

BODY.DISCUSSION.INFLUENCE ON LIPID METABOLISM:
In the high dose group, significant decreases were found in TC and LDL-C levels 260 weeks after the start of GH therapy (Fig. 1). Mean TC decreased, especially in the high dose group, and this change was attributed to a decrease in LDL-C. The baseline status may have affected these decreases, because baseline mean values were significantly higher in male patients in the high dose group, leading to more significant decreases with the treatment, suggesting there might be a confounding factor (data not shown). TC and LDL-C levels were slightly lower in female patients. Since TC levels normally increase with puberty [15], the degree of decrease in TC observed may have been attenuated by pubertal hormonal changes. In the low dose group, a significant increase was observed in HDL-C levels, whereas no significant decreases were noted in TC and LDL-C levels. However, the clinical significance of this result currently remains unclear and awaits further investigation.  After 260 weeks, decreases in TC in the two dose groups and LDL-C in the high dose group correlated with baseline values, indicating that the greater the baseline value, the greater the decrease observed after the treatment (Fig. 2). In both groups, a higher TC was more likely to decrease during GH therapy. This result is consistent with previous findings [16, 17], suggesting that long-term GH treatment has a favorable lowering effect on cholesterol, especially in those with higher cholesterol levels due to genetic and/or environmental backgrounds. No correlation was observed between HDL-C levels at the start of the study and changes after 260 weeks of GH therapy. One patient had markedly higher TC and LDL-C levels than those of the other patients. This patient had a history of IgA nephropathy, which may have elevated TC and LDL-C levels [18].

BODY.DISCUSSION.INFLUENCE ON GLUCOSE METABOLISM:
Post-OGTT insulin levels increased with each year of long-term GH treatment, particularly in the high dose group (Fig. 5). It is possible that the increase in HOMA-IR levels in the final year of GH therapy was a result of patients transitioning into puberty. Overall, 35 % of patients in the low dose group and 37.5 % of patients in the high dose group entered puberty during the study period. The increase in post-OGTT insulin levels is consistent with previous findings in which patients became relatively resistant to insulin after the start of GH therapy [19]. Fasting insulin levels have been shown to increase with age [15]; therefore, the results obtained in this study reflected physiological changes. Previous studies demonstrated that bioactive IGF-I levels increased through decreases in IGF-binding protein in the presence of hyperinsulinemia [20]. Furthermore, an increase in insulin levels has been suggested to promote growth [21].  After long-term GH therapy (260 weeks), the HOMA-IR (Table 3) and insulinogenic index increased. However, no significant differences were observed between the two dose groups, indicating no dose dependency. These results also demonstrated that the GH dose of 0.033 mg/kg/day was already greater relative to GH secreted from the pituitary in normal physiology. Patients with a HOMA-IR of 2.5 or higher are regarded as being resistant to insulin [13, 14], and 25 % of patients in this study (low dose group: 5 out of 20 patients, high dose group: 4 out of 16 patients) exhibited insulin resistance after 260 weeks of GH therapy. These results suggest that, although the dose may be increased in accordance with the responsiveness of individual patients to GH therapy, dose elevations within these limits do not influence glucose tolerance.  No correlations were observed between the HOMA-IR and BMI SDS or between the HbA1c and BMI SDS after 260 weeks of GH therapy. The mean BMI SDS in this study was below 0 SD during the study period and our patients did not include those with a very high/low BMI. A larger number of patients need to be analyzed in future studies in order to more clearly elucidate the relationship between BMI and glucose metabolism in GH-treated SGA.

BODY.CONCLUSIONS:
This study investigated the effect of long term continuous GH treatment in children born SGA on lipid and glucose metabolism. In the high dose group, TC and LDL-C levels decreased significantly over time during the GH therapy. Baseline values correlated with the reductions after 260 weeks in both groups for TC and in the high dose group for LDL-C. This result suggests that the long-term GH treatment used had favorable lowering effects on cholesterol, especially in those with higher cholesterol levels. HbA1c values slightly increased, and post-OGTT insulin levels increased with each year of GH treatment; however, no marked changes were noted in the blood glucose response to OGTT during the 260 weeks of treatment. In healthy adolescents, decreased insulin sensitivity observed during puberty is compensated for by an increase in insulin secretion, hence the increase in HOMA-IR levels observed in the final year of GH therapy may have been a result of patients transitioning into puberty.  The results of this study suggest long-term continuous GH treatment for children born SGA may have potentially beneficial effects on several parameters of lipid metabolism and does not have an adverse effect on glucose metabolism.

Question: Compared to baseline what was the result of 0.067 (high) mg/kg/day for 260 weeks on the mean HDL-C level?
Evidence: In the low dose group, no significant differences were noted in the mean TC and LDL-C levels between the two time points (Fig. 1a and b, respectively).
Answer: no significant difference