TITLE: 
A Mixed Lipid Emulsion for Prevention of Parenteral Nutrition Associated Cholestasis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial



ABSTRACT.OBJECTIVES:
To examine whether a mixed lipid emulsion reduces the incidence of parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g) infants.

ABSTRACT.STUDY DESIGN:
This double-blind randomized trial of 230 ELBW infants (June 2012-October 2015) was performed at a single level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Patients received either a mixed lipid emulsion composed of soybean oil, medium chain triglycerides, olive oil, and fish oil-(intervention) or a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion (control) for parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome measure was PNAC (conjugated bilirubin >1.5 mg/dL [25 μmol/L] at 2 consecutive measurements). The study was powered to detect a reduction of PNAC from 25% to 10%.

ABSTRACT.RESULTS:
Reasons for noneligibility of 274 infants screened were refusal to participate (n = 16), death (n = 10), withdrawal of treatment (n = 5), higher order multiples (n = 9), and parents not available for consent (n = 4). Intention to treat analysis was carried out in 223 infants (7 infants excluded after randomization). Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis was 11 of 110 (10.1%) in the intervention and 18 of 113 (15.9%) in the control group (P = .20). Multivariable analyses showed no statistically significant difference in the intention to treat (aOR 0.428, 95% CI 0.155-1.187; P = .10) or per protocol population (aOR 0.457, 95% CI 0.155-1.347; P = .16). There was no statistically significant effect on any other neonatal morbidity.

ABSTRACT.CONCLUSIONS:
The incidence of parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis was not significantly reduced using a mixed lipid emulsion in ELBW infants.

ABSTRACT.TRIAL REGISTRATION:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01585935.

Extremely low birth weight (ELBW, birth weight <1000 g) infants depend on parenteral nutrition (PN) for several weeks.1 With ongoing PN, parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) is a well-described pathology2 that may progress to liver failure.3 Soybean oil-based lipid emulsions are rich in proinflammatory ω-6 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) and phytosterols4 that are both accused to trigger PNAC.5,6 To overcome these untoward effects alternative oil-based lipid emulsions were developed. Here, the latest generation contains fish oil, which provides ω-3 LC-PUFAs—that are less proinflammatory compared with ω-6 LC-PUFAs—and is devoid of phytosterols.4 Infants with PNAC because of intestinal failure who were treated with a lipid emulsion exclusively based on fish oil showed marked improvements of liver function.7,8 Most recently, a mixed lipid emulsion composed of soybean oil, medium chain triglycerides (MCTs), olive oil, and fish oil (SMOF-LE) has become available, and is licensed for pediatric use in the European Union, but not the US because of insufficient data to date on adequate supply with essential fatty acids (EFA). Because of its mixed nature, SMOF-LE contains less ω-6 LC-PUFA4,9 and phytosterols10 but more ω-3 LC-PUFA and also more alpha-tocopherol4,9 compared with soybean oil-based lipid emulsion. Parenteral nutrition using SMOF-LE may, therefore, prevent PNAC compared with the current standard soybean oil-based lipid emulsion. We therefore hypothesized that PN using SMOF-LE would reduce PNAC in ELBW infants. The current trial was set up to compare SMOF-LE and soybean oil-based lipid emulsion for PN of ELBW infants with PNAC as the primary outcome.
BODY.METHODS:
This double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01585935) was performed at the level IV11 neonatal care unit of the University Children’s Hospital Vienna (Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria). The primary aim was to assess whether a mixed lipid emulsion (SMOF-LE) would reduce PNAC in ELBW infants compared with a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion. Secondary aims were to explore the impact on other morbidities. Recruitment was initiated in June 2012. Eligible participants were ELBW infants admitted before 24 hours of life. Infants with cholestasis (conjugated bilirubin >1.5 mg/dL [25 μmol/L]) before intervention and higher order multiples were not eligible. Infants with conditions associated with cholestasis independent of PN (ie, infection with cytomegalovirus, HIV, hepatitis B or C, rhesus mediated hemolysis, cystic fibrosis, inborn errors of metabolism or primary liver diseases) were not eligible or excluded postrandomization.12 Participants were randomized using permuted blocks (ratio 1:1, block size of 4) and stratified according to sex and birth weight (<750 vs ≥750 g) using a software13 prepared by an independent statistician, who kept the randomization sequence concealed until the end of the study. To account for correlation of twins, the first twin was randomized and the second assigned to the opposite treatment.14 Intervention was started within the first 120 hours of life. Infants received either a mixed lipid emulsion composed of 30% soybean oil, 30% MCT, 25% olive oil, and 15% fish oil (SMOFlipid 20%; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany; SMOF-LE; ω-6:ω-3 ratio 2.5:1) or a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion (Intralipid 20%; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany; soybean oil-based lipid emulsion; ω-6:ω-3 ratio 8:1) for PN over 24 hours. Both products have similar side effects and are registered for infants in Europe, but in the US SMOFlipid 20% (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) is only registered for adults. Based on a content of 35 mg/mL (range: 28-50) linoleic acid and a requirement of 0.25 g/kg/day15 to prevent EFA deficiency, SMOF-LE theoretically will prevent EFA deficiency at 1.4 g/kg/day (range: 1-1.8).
Based on a prevalence of PNAC of 25% at our unit,16 a χ2 test indicated that 100 infants/group were required to detect a relative reduction by 60% (from 25% to 10%) with a 2-sided 5% significance level and a power of 80%. Assuming a dropout rate of 18%, we aimed at recruiting 122 infants/group in a 3-year period.
Participants, healthcare providers, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were blinded. The investigational products were visually indistinguishable. Taste or smell was regarded irrelevant because of the closed mode of application; study lipids were stored at room temperature and applied using light protected syringes and infusion lines. A blinding team uninvolved in clinical decisions established the blinding code and masked the glass containers using opaque labels designated “Lipid A” or “Lipid B.” Labels were resistant to detachment, in particular by 70% alcohol used during aseptic preparation. Neonatal nurses who prepared the study lipids for PN were part of the blinding team. Discarded containers were controlled for blinding integrity. The attending physicians prescribed the study lipids together with PN using a computer program (catoPAN; Cato Software Solutions, Becton Dickinson, Vienna, Austria) customized to include the designations “Lipid A” and “Lipid B.” Participants received full PN from birth using soybean oil-based lipid emulsion (1 g/kg/day) and were switched to study lipids after enrollment. Lipids were dosed up to 3 g/kg/day at the discretion of the attending physicians and reduced in relation to enteral nutrition (increased up to 20 mL/kg/day). Serum triglycerides were measured at least weekly. Lipids were halted for 24 hours at triglyceride levels >400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L) or down titrated >250 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L). Parenteral nutrition was stopped at 140-160 mL/kg/day of enteral feeds. Urodeoxycholic acid was administered to patients that developed cholestasis. Parenteral fish oil (Omegaven; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) was permitted as rescue therapy (1 g/kg/day) if conjugated bilirubin was >6 mg/dL (100 μmol/L). Infants were followed until their 44th week of postmenstrual age (PMA), discharge, or transfer to another hospital.
Patient data were collected from the electronic charts (ICCA; Phillips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and discharge letters. Data on PN were collected from the prescription software (catoPAN; Cato Software Solutions, Becton Dickinson, Vienna, Austria).
Demographic characteristics were recorded as shown in Table I.
A full course of prenatal steroids was defined as 2 doses of betamethasone administered 24 hours apart. Surfactant (Curosurf; Chiesi, Parma, Italy) was administered to all infants <28 + 0 weeks of gestational age17 or else if deficiency was suspected (>35% oxygen with saturation ranges of 88%-96%). Anthropometry was performed by the attending nurses and z scores calculated using growth curves by Fenton et al.18,19 Small for gestational age was defined as birth weight <10th percentile (z score <–1.28).
The primary outcome PNAC, measures of liver function, and neonatal morbidities were recorded as shown in Table II.
PNAC was defined as conjugated bilirubin levels >1.5 mg/dL (25 μmol/L) at 2 consecutive measurements16 by spectrophotometric quantitation (Vitros Chemistry System; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, New Jersey). Peak levels of liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase [GT], and alkaline phosphatase [AP]) during hospitalization were identified. Blood sampling was performed weekly as long as PN was required and then every 7-14 days. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) was screened for by indirect ophthalmoscopy starting at 5 weeks of age. Treatment (laser or intravitreal ranibizumab) was performed at ROP stage ≥3. Culture proven sepsis was detected by blood culture (BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN; BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) drawn after birth and before any antibiotic treatment. Intraventricular hemorrhage and cystic periventricular leukomalacia were diagnosed by cerebral ultrasound performed every 7-14 days. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was diagnosed clinically (Bell’s stage ≥IIa20) or after surgical exploration. Focal intestinal perforation was defined as perforation in an otherwise healthy bowel. All infants received probiotics21 and lactoferrin.22 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was defined as supplementary oxygen after 36 + 0 weeks PMA. Persistent ductus arteriosus was treated if hemodynamically significant (enddiastolic blood flow in the left pulmonary artery >20 cm/s or backward flow in the abdominal aorta)23 using ibuprofen. Pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed by measurement of tricuspid regurgitation or right-to-left/bidirectional shunt across the ductus arteriosus24 and treated using inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil or both.
Data on study lipids, nutrition and growth were recorded as shown in Table III.
Therapy adherence was calculated as the percentage study lipids were correctly provided; >80% was considered highly adherent.25 Enteral feeds were provided every 3 hours; the median volume of a single feed per kg in the first week of life was calculated. For growth analysis (anthropometry with z score difference from birth to discharge), only survivors were analyzed to avoid distortion of measurements by perimortal edema.
BODY.STATISTICAL ANALYSES:
The χ2 test was used to examine the relationship between the intervention and PNAC. The primary outcome was additionally analyzed by binary logistic regression (Table IV). Possible confounders were specified according to literature (male sex,26 sepsis,27 compound outcome of NEC, focal intestinal perforation and gastrointestinal surgery,28 birth weight,29 total days on PN,3 z score of birth weight,16 and enteral nutrition in the first week of life per kg birth weight16) and tested in univariable logistic regression models for significant influence. Because of the low number of events the confounders included in the final model were restricted to those with univariate P < .01. Furthermore, the covariates of the final model were reduced according to Akaike information criterion to avoid overfitting. Secondary outcome measures were compared between the treatment groups with χ2 test for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Analyses were performed by intention to treat (ITT). As sensitivity analysis, calculations were additionally carried out on the per protocol set (treatment adherence ≥80%,25 admission ≥28 days according to the study protocol). Because of opposed allocation of twins, calculations including the mother as random factor were not necessary.14 There was no interim analysis.
The study was conducted in conformance with the Declaration of Helsinki, International Conference on Harmonisation / Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and the respective European Union directives embedded in the Austrian drug act. Written consent from 1 parent was sufficient due to low risk for participants.30 Patients were insured as legally required. The study was approved by the institution’s ethic committee (EK 2011/1030) and registered at European Clinical Trial Database (EudraCT 2011-005456-33) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01585935).


BODY.RESULTS:
A total of 274 ELBW infants were screened: 223 infants were available for ITT analysis, 206 for per protocol analysis (Figure; available at www.jpeds.com). Three participants did not receive the intervention (death: n = 2; error: n = 1), 3 participants were withdrawn due to conditions associated with cholestasis (mitochondriopathy: n = 1; Gaucher disease type II: n = 1; undefined genetic syndrome: n = 1), and 1 participant was withdrawn due to cholestasis before intervention. Thus, 7 participants (SMOF-LE: n = 4; soybean oil-based lipid emulsion: n = 3) were excluded from ITT analysis after randomization.12 Recruitment ended after the intended number of participants was included (July 2015); follow-up lasted until October 2015. Premature unblinding (accidentally or as a result of a serious adverse event) did not occur. All analyses were prespecified according to the study protocol.
Demographic characteristics are shown in Table I. Study participants were born between 23 + 1 and 33 + 4 weeks PMA (median 26 + 0 weeks) and weighed between 390 and 998 g (median 775 g).
The primary outcome PNAC was 36% lower using SMOFLE compared with soybean oil-based lipid emulsion, a relative difference that was statistically not significant (Table II). We found no significant difference in PNAC characteristics, highest conjugated bilirubin, or liver enzymes. Mortality, hospitalization, culture proven sepsis and morbidity (visual, gastrointestinal, neurologic, cardiovascular, and pulmonary) did not differ significantly. Infants receiving fish oil as a rescue therapy did not differ between groups in mortality (SMOF-LE: 0/3 vs soybean oil-based lipid emulsion: 1/4; P = .35) or normalization of PNAC until discharge (SMOFLE: 1/3 vs soybean oil-based lipid emulsion: 0/4; P = .21). A multivariable model including relevant confounders showed no significant difference for the primary outcome (Table IV).
Therapy adherence was high and equal between groups (Table III). Both groups received PN for a comparable time with similar amounts of lipids. Triglyceride levels were measured at similar intravenous lipid supply and did not differ significantly, as well as the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia. Feeding volumes in the first week of life and the use of mother’s milk were similar. There was no significant difference in anthropometry from birth to the end of the study.

BODY.DISCUSSION:
In this prospective, double-blind randomized trial in ELBW infants a mixed lipid emulsion composed of soybean oil, MCT, olive oil, and fish oil did not significantly reduce the incidence of PNAC compared with a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion. We found no effect on measures such as ROP, BPD, and growth.
Lipid emulsions based on soybean oil are the currently recommended product for provision of parenteral lipids in preterm infants,4,31 and the only licensed lipid emulsion for infants in the US.9 Because side effects of PN on liver function were ascribed to the specific properties of soybean oil, research focused on reducing the excess of ω-6 LC-PUFAs and phytosterols in lipid emulsions by admixing alternative oils (MCT and olive) and most recently fish oil providing ω-3 LC-PUFAs to counterbalance proinflammatory ω-6 effects.4 In this regard, SMOFLE is the most recent development and was shown to improve the supply with the crucial ω-3 LC-PUFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) while lowering soybean oil exposure by 70% and phytosterol exposure by roughly 50%.10 Also, the higher supply with vitamin E compared with soybean oil-based lipid emulsion may prevent PNAC as recently shown in preterm piglets.32 However, until now clinical trials have not provided enough evidence for improvement of clinical outcomes such as PNAC to justify a change of the current guidelines that recommend soybean oil-based lipid emulsion.
Four out of 6 trials that have tested SMOF-LE vs soybean oil-based lipid emulsion in 310 preterm infants reported on PNAC as secondary outcome,33–36 without a significant effect in a recent meta-analysis.31 However, the overall incidence of PNAC was 5% across studies, therefore, the relatively low number of infants analyzed may not suffice to exclude a clinically meaningful effect. Our trial was the first designed to investigate SMOF-LE for prevention of PNAC as primary outcome. To attain a high baseline incidence, we exclusively recruited the vulnerable group of ELBW infants with an anticipated PNAC incidence of 25% at our unit.16 However, the power to prove our hypothesis was lowered by an observed PNAC incidence of only 15.9% in the current trial, attributable to an accelerated weaning from PN compared with the planning phase (−10 days).16 This shorter time on PN is an important limitation of our study and possibly related to the implementation of probiotics at our unit before the start of this trial in 201021 and their preventive effect against NEC. Reduced fear of NEC possibly encouraged clinicians to establish full enteral feeds faster.
Although our study showed that SMOF-LE did not significantly prevent PNAC in ELBW, our results cannot be generalized to infants with a substantially longer time on PN such as those with intestinal failure. The same applies to infants with established PNAC. Here, a significant decline of conjugated bilirubin was demonstrated in a pilot RCT after switching from soybean oil-based lipid emulsion to SMOF-LE, however, only after adjusting the original analysis and eliminating a statistical outlier.37 In our study, PNAC also resolved more quickly, however, the numbers were not statistically significant (Table II).
Besides protection of liver function, other morbidities associated with prematurity such as BPD38 might have been affected by the intervention with SMOF-LE. So far meta-analyses did not show a significant influence on BPD.39 On the contrary, Collins et al recently reported their trial of fish oil supplementation in preterm infants and surprisingly found a significantly increased risk for BPD.40 In that study, fish oil was used as enteral add-on from birth to 36 weeks PMA providing a total DHA supply even beyond fetal accretion rates.40 This is in contrast to our study using SMOF-LE, where fish oil is provided parenterally and only as long as PN was needed. However, Collins et al also questioned the safety of PN using SMOF-LE. We and other RCTs found no difference in BPD using SMOF-LE compared with soybean oil-based lipid emulsion.33–36 Furthermore, we found no affection of other outcomes related to inflammatory processes such as pulmonary hypertension41 and persistent ductus arteriosus42 or of any other neonatal morbidity and death.
In recent years, the ω-3 LC-PUFA DHA was included into models of ROP as another nonoxygen-regulated factor.43 Supplementation with fish oil to improve DHA enrichment of the retina was suggested to prevent ROP.43 Here, SMOF-LE would not only provide DHA but also higher amounts of vitamin E4 known to prevent ROP.44 Two RCTs studied the effect of SMOF-LE33 or a pure fish oil LE45 on ROP as primary outcome. In the study by Beken et al, SMOF-LE significantly reduced any ROP.33 Pawlik et al showed that co-application of a pure fish oil LE and soybean oil-based lipid emulsion significantly prevented severe ROP.45 A recent systematic review suggested a preventive effect based on RCTs and observational studies.46 In the present study, we did not find any effect against any stage of ROP. Compared with the study by Pawlik et al, we provided less fish oil using SMOF-LE, which may indicate some dose dependency. However, the lack of effect compared with Beken et al (ROP reduced by 80%) who also used SMOF-LE is striking.33 In this context, it seems important that infants in our study were more immature by 4 weeks compared with Beken et al. As ROP typically occurs after 30 weeks PMA, the timing of fish oil supplementation from birth and retinal DHA enrichment in relation to the actual PMA probably matters. In this respect, well-designed pharmacologic studies on dosing and timing of SMOF-LE or pure fish oil LE in relation to the actual PMA are necessary. However, it is discouraging that the trial by Collins et al, who applied enteral fish oil in high amounts, also showed no effect on ROP.40
Safety and tolerance of SMOF-LE is another important issue inconsistently referred to in literature. Although lipid clearance was even improved in adults,47 serum triglycerides were found significantly higher in preterm infants using SMOF-LE compared with soybean oil-based lipid emulsion, though at doses exceeding current recommendations (>3 g/kg/day).34 In our study, serum triglyceride levels and the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia did not differ between SMOF-LE and soybean oil-based lipid emulsion.
Postnatal growth failure is a frequently observed problem in preterm infants.48 Although SMOF-LE and soybean oil-based lipid emulsion provide similar amounts of energy, improved supply with ω-3 LC-PUFAs might impact on head growth as DHA rapidly accumulates in the fetal brain in late pregnancy.49 Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of biochemical aspects showed lower levels of arachidonic acid using SMOF-LE50 and raised concerns because of an association of low arachidonic acid levels and growth failure.51 In our study, we found no significant impact of SMOF-LE on anthropometry. Moreover, there is a lack of studies demonstrating the efficacy of SMOF-LE in the prevention of EFA deficiency in preterm infants. As we did not measure EFA in our study, we can only speculate. A supply of less than 0.25 g/kg/day of linoleic acid may cause EFA deficiency in preterm infants.15 It therefore seems prudent to aim at a supply of 2 g/kg/day SMOF-LE if enteral nutrition is low in the first week of life, or likely even at 2.5 g/kg/day in exclusively parenterally nourished ELBW infants, to safely prevent EFA deficiency.

Question: Compared to soybean oil-based lipid emulsion (control) what was the result of mixed lipid emulsion composed of soybean oil, medium chain triglycerides, olive oil, and fish oil-(intervention) on Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis?
Evidence:  Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis was 11 of 110 (10.1%) in the intervention and 18 of 113 (15.9%) in the control group (P = .20)
Answer: no significant difference