TITLE: Consumption of 

  ABSTRACT:
Elderly adults have alterations in their gut microbiota and immune functions that are
associated with higher susceptibility to infections and metabolic disorders. Probiotics
and prebiotics, and their synbiotic combinations are food supplements that have been shown
to improve both gut and immune function. The objective of this randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, cross-over human clinical trial was to study immune function and the
gut microbiota in healthy elderly adults. Volunteers (n 37) consumed
prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS; 8 g/d), probiotic Bifidobacterium
lactis Bi-07 (Bi-07; 109 colony-forming units/d), their combination
(Bi-07 + GOS) and maltodextrin control (8 g/d) in four 3-week periods separated by 4-week
wash-out periods. Immune function was analysed by determining the phagocytic and oxidative
burst activity of monocytes and granulocytes, whole-blood response to lipopolysaccharide,
plasma chemokine concentrations and salivary IgA levels. Gut microbiota composition and
faecal SCFA content were determined using 16S ribosomal RNA fluorescence in
situ hybridisation and HPLC, respectively. Primary statistical analyses indicated
the presence of carry-over effects and thus measurements from only the first
supplementation period were considered valid. Subsequent statistical analysis showed that
consumption of Bi-07 improved the phagocytic activity of monocytes
(P < 0·001) and granulocytes (P = 0·02). Other
parameters were unchanged. We have for the first time shown that the probiotic Bi-07 may
provide health benefits to elderly individuals by improving the phagocytic activity of
monocytes and granulocytes. The present results also suggest that in the elderly, the
effects of some probiotics and prebiotics may last longer than in adults.

BODY:
Of the population of Europe, 20 % are elderly (aged > 65 years) and this is predicted
to increase to 25 % by 2020 according to the WHO. As individuals age, changes to the
physiology and function of the gastrointestinal tract and immune system status
occur(
1
). These changes are associated with increased susceptibility to infections,
metabolic disorders and frailty that have significant impact on the quality of life in elderly
individuals and healthcare costs to society.  Although age-related changes have been shown in the composition, biodiversity and metabolic
activities of the gut microbiota, clear patterns of changes are still obscure due to the
impact of the environment and host on the microbiota(
2
–
4
). For example, the amount of Bacteroides in the intestine
has been shown to both increase and decrease in elderly subjects depending on the population
studied(
5
–
7
). It is, however, well established that with age the amount of facultative
anaerobes increases, such as opportunistic pathogens found in Proteobacteria and
Bacilli(
5
–
9
). Also, the number and diversity of beneficial bifidobacteria have been
shown to decline in some studies, indicating that a detrimental shift in the balance of
microbial species occurs with ageing(
1
,
4
).  Changes in the microbiota of the elderly are associated with changes in the immune system
status characterised by higher production of pro-inflammatory cytokines(
3
). It was recently shown that higher amounts of Bacilli and Proteobacteria
in the intestine are associated with increased IL-6 and IL-8 plasma levels in the
elderly(
3
). Despite the increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, it seems that
the reactivity of the innate and adaptive immune systems in the elderly is poorer. In
vivo these findings are perhaps best highlighted by low vaccination responses that
lead to higher susceptibility to infections(
10
,
11
). On a mechanism level, it has been shown that ageing decreases toll-like
receptor (TLR) signalling. For example, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) signalling through TLR4 is
impaired, leading to decreased cytokine production and immune function(
12
) that could explain the reduced phagocytic capacity of neutrophils in the
elderly(
11
,
13
).  An appealing approach to modulate gut microbiota, poor immune response and detrimental
effects of the ageing population is through the use of dietary interventions that have an
impact on both the gut microbiota and immune function. Probiotics and prebiotics are widely
accepted nutritional supplements that have beneficial effects on both microbiota composition
and potentially the immune system in the elderly(
14
–
16
). Probiotics were defined in 2001 by an FAO/WHO workgroup as 'live
microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the
host'. A prebiotic is defined as 'a selectively fermented ingredient that results in specific
changes in the composition and/or activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota, thus conferring
benefit(s) upon host health'(
17
). Prebiotics are complex oligosaccharides such as galacto-oligosaccharides
(GOS), inulin and fructo-oligosaccharides that are preferentially fermented by health-positive
bacteria(
18
–
21
). This leads to changes in the metabolism of the microbiota and in higher
intestinal concentrations of beneficial SCFA(
15
). Only a few clinical trials have compared the effects of probiotics,
prebiotics and their synbiotic combinations in a single trial. In a recent study it was
concluded that changes to microbiota were different in a resistant starch and
Bifidobacterium lactis synbiotic group than in prebiotic or probiotic
groups in patients with colorectal cancer(
22
). Another trial concluded that synbiotic (psyllium and B.
longum) administration improved the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients
and decreased plasma C-reactive protein, but this was not observed in probiotic or prebiotic
groups(
23
). In addition, in probiotic and prebiotic groups there were independent
effects on emotional and bowel function. These studies suggest that synbiotic effects may not
be additive, although a study where GOS, B. lactis Bb-12 and their synbiotic
were administered to healthy adults suggested that the synbiotic increases intestinal
bifidobacteria numbers compared with single products(
24
).  Consumption of probiotic B. lactis strains and GOS has been shown to
increase the number of bifidobacteria and to improve phagocytic activity in elderly adults
(B. lactis HN019 and trans-GOS)(
24
–
26
), indicating that consumption of B. lactis, GOS and their
synbiotic combination could improve health. This clinical trial aims to study the impact of
probiotic B. animalis subsp. lactis Bi-07 (Bi-07), prebiotic
GOS, synbiotic Bi-07 + GOS and maltodextrin control on gut microbiota and the immune system in
healthy elderly adults. The study was designed to follow supplementation-induced changes in
microbiota by analysing marker bacterial groups and SCFA from faecal samples. Changes in
inflammatory status and immune system responsiveness by the supplementation were analysed by
measuring the concentration of inflammatory chemokines in plasma and the responsiveness of
isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells to LPS, respectively. Furthermore, phagocytic and
oxidative burst activity of monocytes and granulocytes was analysed to associate changes in
microbiota and immune cell responsiveness with the function of phagocytic cells.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.TRIAL DESIGN:
A total of forty-one healthy elderly volunteers were screened for inclusion to trial. Of
these, forty were found to be eligible for the study and were randomly divided into four
groups. A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised cross-over study was designed
where volunteers received maltodextrin (8 g/d; Syral), prebiotic GOS (8 g/d; Danisco),
probiotic (Bi-07; 109 colony-forming units/d; Danisco) and synbiotic
GOS + Bi-07 (8 g GOS/d and 109 colony-forming units Bi-07/d). The daily
portions were based on dose–response clinical studies showing that an 8 g portion of GOS
has a bifidogenic effect(
27
) and that 109 colony-forming units of B.
lactis induce changes in elderly microflora(
28
). Volunteers were randomised to groups that consumed the study products
in a predefined order: group 1, prebiotic–synbiotic–maltodextrin–probiotic; group 2,
synbiotic–maltodextrin–probiotic–prebiotic; group 3,
maltodextrin–probiotic–prebiotic–synbiotic; group 4,
probiotic–prebiotic–synbiotic–maltodextrin. Supplements were provided for 21 d, with a 28
d wash-out period that has been effective in previous studies with B.
lactis and GOS(
24
,
25
,
27
) (Fig. 1). Compliance was not
measured. The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01586247. Fig. 1.Schematic overview of the study design. MDX, maltodextrin; GOS,
galacto-oligosaccharides; Bi-07, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.
lactis Bi-07.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.VOLUNTEERS:
The present study was conducted according to guidelines laid down in the Declaration of
Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Research Ethics
Committee of the University of Reading. Written informed consent was obtained from all
subjects. Volunteers were recruited from the Reading area. Inclusion criteria were: a
signed consent form, age over 60 years, not in residential care, and good general health
as determined by medical questionnaires. Exclusion criteria included evidence of physical
or mental disease or planned major surgery or use of antibiotics within the previous 6
months. Subject characteristics are described in Table
1. Volunteers attended study appointments before and after each treatment and
wash-out period. At study appointments, anthropometric measurements were recorded (weight,
blood pressure, waist circumference) and volunteers provided a fasted blood sample
(collected into heparinised tubes), and samples of saliva and faeces (Fig. 1). Table 1.Baseline characteristics of volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled,
randomised cross-over study of a candidate prebiotic (galacto-oligosaccharides; GOS;
8 g/d), probiotic (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.
lactis Bi-07 (Bi-07); 109 colony-forming units/d) or
synbiotic (GOS + Bi-07)(Mean values with their standard errors, or number of subjects)Maltodextrin (n 9)Prebiotic (n 9)Probiotic (n 8)Synbiotic (n 10)Mean
sem
Mean
sem
Mean
sem
Mean
sem

P
Sex (n) Male4355 Female56350·69Age (years)63·0a0·570·7b0·6964·6a0·570·5b1·3<0·001Weight (kg)76·54·574·53·373·85·475·04·30·98BMI (kg/m2)25·61·328·41·125·61·225·21·40·27Plasma cholesterol (mm)5·80·55·60·35·30·26·00·40·66a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were
significantly different (P < 0·05).

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.STUDY PRODUCTS:
The GOS product was synthesised at 55°C (pH 5·0) by 50 acid lactase units (ALU)
β-galactosidase-1/g from Aspergillus oryzae GC288 using 55 % (w/v)
lactose (Dairy Crest) as a substrate. The GOS product yield was 32·45 % (w/w). The product
had predominantly Gal(β1–6), Gal(β1–4) and Gal(β1–3) linkages. Bi-07 (ATCC SD5220;
American Type Culture Collection) was produced according to good manufacturing practice at
the Madison plant by Danisco. The maltodextrin was generously provided by Syral. The
products were consumed daily by the subjects as provided in individual daily dose sachets
in powder form.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION AND RANDOMISATION:
The study group size was estimated by least standardised difference (LSD) using expected
changes in the microbial population and faeces as the primary outcome. On the basis of a 5
% significance level, a power of 95 % for detecting the main effect and two-factor
interactions, with a standardised size effect of 0·85 or more, a sample size of eight per
treatment per group was required. A total of ten per group were included in the study to
allow for potential study 'drop-out'. Blinding was done by Danisco and randomisation to
study groups 1–4 by the investigators.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
The data from the cross-over study were analysed using linear fixed-effects models with
fixed effect terms for the presence/absence of prebiotic/probiotic treatment and their
interaction (i.e. a 2 × 2 factorial approach), and a baseline regression coefficient
accounting for individual baseline differences between the subjects. Based on the residual
analysis, some variables were transformed using logarithmic, square root or power
transformations. All the treatments related to statistically significant factors in the
linear models (P < 0·05) were further statistically compared using
contrasts for the linear models. The number of contrasts depended on the statistically
significant terms, and the obtained P values were adjusted for multiple
comparisons using a single-step algorithm.  The linear model analyses were conducted with R: A Language and Environment for
Statistical Computing (version 2.14.2; R Development Core Team) using packages nlme:
Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models (version 3.1-103; J. Pinheiro, D. Bates, S.
DebRoy, D. Sarkar and R Development Core Team), and multcomp (version
1.2.12)(
29
).

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.PHAGOCYTOSIS AND OXIDATIVE BURST:
Phagocytosis and oxidative burst by monocytes and granulocytes were determined in fresh
(4–6 h) heparinised whole-blood samples using PHAGOTEST® and
BURSTTEST® (ORPEGEN Pharma) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Escherichia coli, provided by the manufacturer, were opsonised with
complement and immunoglobulins using pooled sera, and were labelled with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC). In brief, E. coli were incubated for 10 min in
heparinised whole blood at 37°C. Phagocytosis was stopped by placing the sample on ice and
by adding a solution that quenches extracellularly bound FITC–E. coli.
Erythrocytes were lysed and sample washed. Using a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur, BD
Biosciences), monocytes and granulocytes were identified based upon their characteristic
appearance on a FSC/SSC (forward scatter versus side scatter) plot. The
percentages of phagocytes that had ingested bacteria (fluorescent/total) and had
phagocytic activity (number of bacteria per cell as determined by mean fluorescence
intensity) were determined.  In BURSTTEST®, complement and immunoglobulin-opsonised E.
coli as provided by the manufacturer were incubated with heparinised whole blood
for 10 min at 37°C. Fluorogenic dihydrorhodoamine-123, which reacts with reactive oxygen
species (ROS), was added to the sample and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. The reaction was
stopped by adding an erythrocyte-lysing solution. After washing, the monocytes and
granulocytes were identified by means of an FSC/SSC plot using a flow cytometer
(FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences). The production of reactive oxygen metabolites within
monocytes and granulocytes was determined by counting the percentage of fluorescent cells
and their mean fluorescence intensity, which correlates with ROS production.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.IMMUNE ASSAYS:
Cytokine and chemokine concentrations were determined using commercially available
bead-arrays from BenderMedSystems which both utilise sandwich ELISA technology. All immune
assays were conducted to conform to an intra-assay CV of <10 % and an inter-assay
CV of <20 %. Sample concentrations were calculated using an eight-point standard
curve.  LPS-stimulated cytokine production was analysed in 1/10 diluted whole blood. Roswell Park
Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 media containing HEPES and l-glutamine (Lonza) was
used, to which streptomycin (1 mg/ml) and penicillin (62·5 μg/ml) were added. Cultures
were incubated for 24 h in the presence of LPS from E. coli O111:B4
(1 μg/ml; Sigma Aldrich). Culture supernatant fractions were assessed for cytokine
production using a Th1/Th2 cytokine array (Bender MedSystems) in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions. This array includes interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4,
IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, TNF-α and TNF-β. The levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-5,
IL-12p70, and TNF-β were below detection levels in most of the samples (data not
presented).  Plasma chemokines were assessed using a human chemokine 6-plex kit (Bender MedSystems) in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. This array includes granulocyte-colony
stimulating factor (G-CSF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), monokine induced by
interferon-γ (MIG), macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α (MIP1-α) and macrophage
inflammatory protein 1-β (MIP1-β).  Saliva samples were collected by expectoration in the morning by fasted participants.
Samples were centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min and supernatant fractions stored at –20°C before analysis. Salivary IgA
content was determined by sandwich ELISA (Immunodiagnostik) in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.FAECAL SAMPLE PROCESSING:
Freshly voided faecal samples were collected in sterile plastic containers. Samples were
stored at room temperature under anaerobic conditions before processing, which typically
commenced within 4 h of sample receipt. Samples for use in faecal dry weight and IgA
assays were stored at –20°C, and samples for quantitative PCR and enumeration of total
bacteria by flow cytometry stored at –80°C. Remaining faecal samples were diluted 1 in 10
(w/w) in PBS (0·1 m; pH 7·0) and homogenised in a Stomacher 400 (Seward) for
2 min at normal speed (460 paddle beats per min). A 15 ml sample of faecal slurry was
vortexed with 2 g of 3-mm diameter glass beads (VWR International) and then centrifuged to
remove particulate matter (1500 g; 2 min). The supernatant fraction was collected for use in SCFA analysis and
assessment of genus-level changes in the gut microbiota by fluorescence in
situ hybridisation with 16S ribosomal RNA targeted oligonucleotide probes.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.FLUORESCENCE :
The faecal slurry supernatant fraction was fixed in paraformaldehyde (1:4 (v/v) in 4 %
paraformaldehyde in 0·1 m-PBS, pH 7·2) for 4 h at 4°C, centrifuged (13 000 g; 5 min), washed twice with 0·1 m-PBS, re-suspended in 1:1 PBS–ethanol and
stored at –20°C. Oligonucleotide probes used were Cy-3 labelled and synthesised by
Sigma-Aldrich. Probes used were Bif164, Bac303, Chis150, Lab158 and ATO291, Erec482,
Fprau655, Enter1432 and Strc493 specific for Bifidobacterium spp.,
Bacteroides–Prevotella group, Clostridium clusters I
and II (including Clostridium perfringens and C.
histolyticum), Lactobacillus–Enterococcus subgroup,
Atopobium cluster, Eubacterium rectale–Blautia
coccoides group, Faecalibacterium cluster,
Enterobacterium group and Streptococcus
group–Lactococcus, respectively(
30
–
36
). Samples were hybridised as described by Costabile et
al.(
37
). Data are expressed as log10 counts per g dry faeces.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.QUANTIFICATION OF :
DNA was extracted from the faecal samples with the use of the QIAamp DNA stool Mini kit
(Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative PCR was used for
quantification of B. lactis using the FAST SYBR green methodology
(Applied Biosystems) in a total volume of 25 μl containing 1 ng of template DNA and 250
nm of the forward primer Blact_1(
38
) and reverse primer Bflact5(
39
). The amplification and detection of DNA were performed with an ABI
7500 sequencing detection system (Applied Biosystems). To obtain standard curves, a
10-fold dilution series ranging from 10 pg to 10 ng of DNA from the bacterial standard
cultures was included in the PCR assays. For determination of DNA, triplicate samples were
used, and the mean quantity per g wet weight was calculated.

BODY.EXPERIMENTAL METHODS.ORGANIC ACIDS:
Filter-sterilised samples (1 ml) of faecal slurry (10 % (w/v) dilution of freshly voided
faeces in PBS; pH 7·0) were used to determine faecal concentrations of organic acids
including acetic acid, propionic acid, i-butyric acid,
n-butyric acid, i-valeric acid,
n-valeric acid, n-caproic acid and
d-/l-lactic acid by HPLC. The column was an ion-exclusion REZEX-ROA
organic acid column (7·8 × 300 nm; Phenomenex) maintained at 85°C. The eluent was
0·0025 mm-sulfuric acid in HPLC-grade water and the flow rate was 0·6 ml/min.
Quantification of the samples was obtained through calibration curves of acetic acid,
formic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and lactic acid in concentrations between 6·25
and 100 mm.

BODY.RESULTS.SUBJECT CHARACTERISTICS:
Recruitment of forty-one subjects for the study took place in the Reading area of the UK.
Of these, forty volunteers passed the inclusion/exclusion criteria and started the trial
in March 2008; thirty-seven completed the trial in October 2009. However, one subject was
removed from the statistical analysis due to missing samples, resulting in a study size of
thirty-six subjects (see the Sample size determination and randomisation section, Table 1 and Fig.
1).

BODY.RESULTS.ANALYSES OF BASELINE DRIFT, CARRY-OVER EFFECT AND SUBJECT CHARACTERISTICS:
Stability of the baseline was studied by comparing results from samples on day –5
(baseline) and on day 0 (before first supplementation). Using independent-samples
t tests it was found that six out of forty parameters had significantly
different levels (P < 0·05) on day 0 than on day –5 in some
supplementation groups (Table 2). These results
indicate that the baselines within the groups were not stable. Table 2.Parameters having baseline drift or carry-over effectsParameterTreatment groupBaseline driftCarry-over effect
Bifidobacterium lactis
Prebiotic✓Bacteroides–PrevotellaProbiotic✓Blautia
coccoides–Eubacterium rectale clusterProbiotic✓✓EnterobacteriaPrebiotic✓✓Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
clusterSynbiotic✓Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
clusterProbiotic✓IL-8Probiotic✓Lactobacillus–Streptococcus groupProbiotic✓Oxidative burst activity of monocytesProbiotic✓Percentage of granulocytes having oxidative burst
activityPlacebo✓Percentage of monocytes having phagocytic activityPlacebo✓Prebiotic✓✓Probiotic✓Synbiotic✓Phagocytic activity of monocytesPlacebo✓✓Probiotic✓Total bacteriaProbiotic✓  Carry-over effects are a known problem in clinical trials with a cross-over design.
Samples from day 0 (before first supplementation) and day 49 (after the first wash-out)
were analysed for similarity using independent-samples t tests. By using
P < 0·05 as a cut-off, it was found that in eleven out of forty
parameters the values did not return to pre-supplementation levels in some groups (Table 2). It was concluded that carry-over effects
might bias the results and thus statistical analysis was conducted for parallel groups
using results from samples obtained on day 0 (before the first supplementation) and on day
21 (after the first supplementation).  The change in study design from cross-over to parallel resulted in an unbalanced age
distribution between the study groups. Subjects in the maltodextrin and probiotic groups
were of similar age, but subjects in the prebiotic and synbiotic groups were on average
6·8 years younger (P < 0·001) (Table 1).

BODY.RESULTS.ACTIVITY OF PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONOCYTES AND GRANULOCYTES:
The supplementations did not change the percentages of monocytes and granulocytes engaged
in phagocytosis compared with maltodextrin (Fig.
2(a) and 2(b)); however, there was a higher
percentage of phagocytosing monocytes in the probiotic group compared with the prebiotic
(P = 0·005) group (Fig. 2(a)).
Phagocytic activity of monocytes in the probiotic group was higher than in the
maltodextrin (P < 0·001) or prebiotic groups
(P < 0·001) (Fig. 2(c)).
Furthermore, a higher phagocytic activity of granulocytes was found in the probiotic
(P = 0·02) supplementation group compared with the maltodextrin group
(Fig. 2(d)). Fig. 2.Phagocytic activity of monocytes and granulocytes. Phagocytic activity was measured
using a flow cytometer after incubation of opsonised and fluorescence-labelled
Escherichia coli in whole blood of the subjects. Percentage of
monocytes (a) and granulocytes (b) of the total population that had phagocytosed
E. coli. Phagocytic activity of monocytes (c) and granulocytes
(d) measured as fluorescence intensity in individual cells that had phagocytosed
E. coli. Statistical differences were calculated using linear
model contrasts. Whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values; the box
represents the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile; + indicates the mean
value. Mean value was significantly different from that of the maltodextrin group:
*P = 0·02, **P < 0·001. Mean value was
significantly different from that of the prebiotic group:
†P = 0·005, ††P < 0·001.  The BURSTTEST® assay was used to measure the presence of ROS in phagocytes
after incubation of opsonised E. coli in whole blood from the study
subjects. The proportion of monocytes and granulocytes producing ROS was not affected by
the supplementations compared with maltodextrin (Fig.
3(a) and 3(b)), nor was oxidative burst
activity of these cells (Fig. 3(c) and 3(d)). However, the percentage of monocytes producing
ROS in the probiotic group was higher than in the synbiotic group
(P = 0·04) (Fig. 3(a)). Fig. 3.Oxidative burst activity of phagocytes. Oxidative burst activity was measured using
a flow cytometer after incubation of opsonised and fluorescence-labelled
Escherichia coli in whole blood of the subjects. Percentage of
monocytes (a) and granulocytes (b) of the total population showing oxidative burst
activity. Oxidative burst activity of monocytes (c) and granulocytes (d) measured as
fluorescence intensity in individual cells that had oxidative burst activity.
Statistical differences were calculated using linear model contrasts. Whiskers
represent the minimum and maximum values; the box represents the 25th percentile,
median and 75th percentile; + indicates the mean value. ‡Mean value was
significantly different from that of the probiotic group
(P = 0·04).

BODY.RESULTS.LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE STIMULATION OF THE WHOLE BLOOD AND SOLUBLE IMMUNE MARKERS:
Immune markers were analysed from saliva, plasma, and by stimulating heparinised whole
blood with LPS. The levels of cytokines in whole blood, chemokine concentrations in plasma
and IgA levels in saliva were unaltered by the treatments (online Supplementary Table
S1).

BODY.RESULTS.COMPOSITION AND METABOLIC FUNCTION OF THE INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA:
Microbiota compositions of the subjects were characterised using 16S ribosomal RNA
targeted fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the selected marker
species or quantitative PCR for the determination of B. lactis (Table 3). Composition of the microbiota did not
significantly change in any of the treatment groups. Metabolic activity of the microbiota
was measured by analysing organic acid concentrations in the faeces, but there was no
significant effect of any of the treatments (online Supplementary Table S2). Table 3.Gut microbiota of volunteers during treatment with placebo, a prebiotic
(galacto-oligosaccharides; GOS; 8 g/d), probiotic (Bifidobacterium
animalis subsp. lactis Bi-07 (Bi-07); 109
colony-forming units/d) or synbiotic (GOS + Bi-07) at the end of the first 21 d
treatment period(Mean values with their standard errors)TreatmentMaltodextrin (n 9)
(log10 cells/g faeces)Prebiotic (n 9)
(log10 cells/g faeces)Probiotic (n 8)
(log10 cells/g faeces)Synbiotic (n 10)
(log10 cells/g faeces)Bacterial groupMean
sem
Mean
sem
Mean
sem
Mean
sem
Atopobium cluster10·30·1010·20·1010·10·0510·10·06Bacteroides–Prevotella10·60·0710·40·1510·60·0810·40·08Bifidobacterium group10·10·139·70·209·40·399·90·13
Bifidobacterium lactis
5·70·256·00·226·30·226·20·30Clostridium clusters I and II8·80·248·10·278·90·437·90·27Blautia
coccoides–Eubacterium rectale cluster10·70·0710·60·1010·80·0610·50·06Enterobacteria9·50·319·10·279·20·419·40·17Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
cluster10·50·0510·30·1210·50·0410·40·09Lactobacillus–Streptococcus group9·20·248·60·149·40·168·60·10Total bacteria11·30·0911·20·1211·30·0711·20·06

BODY.DISCUSSION:
A randomised placebo-controlled cross-over clinical trial was designed to study the effect
of probiotic Bi-07, prebiotic GOS or their synbiotic combination Bi-07 + GOS on gut and
immune functions in healthy non-institutionalised elderly adults. It was found that the
baseline of some of the parameters drifted before supplementation (Table 2), which could indicate natural fluctuation in this population.
In addition, statistical analyses of the cross-over study revealed significant carry-over
effects on indices of microbiota and immune function (Table 2), indicating that a 4-week wash-out period was not sufficient in this
trial. In a similar study set-up, the effect of GOS syrup (8·1 g GOS/d), B.
lactis Bb-12 and their combination was studied on bifidobacteria numbers in healthy
adults. It was found that Bb-12 and Bb-12 + GOS syrup supplementation increased
bifidobacteria amounts, but the levels returned to normal after a 2-week wash-out
period(
24
). Another study has also shown that after 2 weeks of wash-out, Bb-12
could be recovered from the faeces of only a few individuals, indicating transient
colonisation of B. lactis in healthy adults(
40
). Furthermore, two recent studies utilising pyrosequencing showed that 2
weeks after GOS supplementation the microbiota composition returned to baseline levels in
healthy adults(
41
,
42
). Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that a 2-week
wash-out period is long enough in healthy adults. In the present study, however, an elderly
population was studied and it may be that probiotic and prebiotic supplementation induces
longer-lasting changes in elderly microbiota than in adults. Interestingly, in a series of
papers, elderly subjects were supplemented with B. lactis HN019 or
Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and after a 3-week wash-out period several
immune indices were numerically higher than at baseline; however, unfortunately, wash-out
time points were not statistically compared with baseline(
25
,
43
,
44
).  To eliminate cross-over effects, samples from only the first supplementation period were
used in the subsequent statistical analyses, making the statistical analysis design parallel
instead of cross-over. This resulted in a higher average age in the maltodextrin and
probiotic groups compared with in the prebiotic and synbiotic groups. As it is known that
microbiota composition and immunological functions decline during ageing, the prebiotic and
synbiotic efficacy (or not) is merely speculative in the present study. However, the
comparison of the maltodextrin control with the probiotic seems to be valid.  It was found that consumption of Bi-07 improved the phagocytic activity of monocytes and
granulocytes against complement and immunoglobulin-opsonised E. coli (Fig. 2(c) and 2(d)). In previously published clinical trials, enhanced phagocytosis in healthy
elderly adults has been shown for Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.
lactis HN019(
25
,
45
) and also in healthy adults for strains Bb-12 and HN019 of the same
species(
46
,
47
). These studies support the results observed for Bi-07 in the present
trial and indicate a positive effect of B. lactis consumption on phagocytic
activity in general that could potentially lead to improved immune responses against
infective agents.  Although improved phagocytic activity was observed in the probiotic group (Fig. 2(c) and 2(d)), it did not lead to higher intracellular ROS generation than what was observed
for the maltodextrin group (Fig. 3(c) and 3(d)). This result was supported by similar
pro-inflammatory cytokine response levels to LPS (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) and
stable chemokine levels in plasma (online Supplementary Table S1) in the maltodextrin and
probiotic groups. On the other hand, probiotic supplementation did not improve
anti-inflammatory IL-10 production either (online Supplementary Table S1). Previous
in vitro studies have shown that in comparison with other
Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains, Bi-07 is
among the most potent inducers of IL-12p70 and IFN-γ from human peripheral blood
monocytes(
48
). IFN-γ and IL-12p70 are prototypical cytokines involved in activating
Th1-type immune responses that enhance phagocytosis and intracellular killing of microbes.
On the other hand, Bi-07 also induced a moderate amount of IL-10 from peripheral blood
mononuclear cells and protected mice from trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced
colitis(
48
), which could explain the null impact on ROS generation. This type of
non-inflammatory phagocytosis is an important mechanism of maintaining homeostasis in the
gut mucosa where overt reactions to commensal microbes may lead to conditions such as
inflammatory bowel disease.  In the present randomised clinical trial on healthy elderly adults, the probiotic Bi-07 had
a positive impact on the phagocytic activity of monocytes and granulocytes in the elderly
subjects without increasing the release of ROS. Consumption of Bi-07 could potentially
improve clearance of bacteria from the body without contributing to the low-grade
inflammation observed in the elderly population(
49
). Thus, consumption of the probiotic Bi-07 may provide long-term health
benefits for the elderly by not contributing to inflammation-associated metabolic disorders
while enhancing the innate immune defence against infections.  The present results indicate that the wash-out time of supplementation may need to be
longer in elderly subjects than what has been shown for adults. Overall, it is likely that
the effective time of the probiotics and prebiotics on the gut microbiota and immune
function is dependent on the population, diet, and on the properties of the probiotics and
prebiotics themselves. It is clear that well-designed clinical trials on the effects of
probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on health are acutely needed.

BODY.SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL:
Supplementary MaterialSupplementary information supplied by authors.Click here for additional data file.

Question: Compared to Control what was the result of Bifidobacterium lactis on Monocytes engaged in phagocytosis?
Evidence: The supplementations did not change the percentages of monocytes and granulocytes engaged
in phagocytosis compared with maltodextrin 
Answer: significantly increased