TITLE: Epoetin administrated after cardiac surgery: effects on renal function and inflammation in a randomized controlled study

  ABSTRACT.BACKGROUND:
Experimentally, erythropoietin (EPO) has nephroprotective as well as immunomodulatory properties when administered after ischemic renal injury. We tested the hypothesis that different doses of recombinant human EPO administered to patients after cardiac surgery would minimize kidney lesions and the systemic inflammatory response, thereby decreasing acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence.

ABSTRACT.METHODS:
In this double-blinded randomized control study, 80 patients admitted to the ICU post-cardiac surgery were randomized by computer to receive intravenously isotonic saline (n = 40) versus α-Epoetin (n = 40): either 40000 IU (n = 20) or 20000 IU (n = 20). The study lasted one year. The primary outcome was the change in urinary NGAL concentration from baseline and 48 h after EPO injection. Creatinine, cystatine C and urinary NGAL levels were measured on the day of randomization and 2–4 days after EPO injection. To assess acute inflammatory response, serum cytokines (IL6 and IL8) were measured at randomization and four days after r-HuEPO injection. Patients and care-takers were blinded for the assignment.

ABSTRACT.RESULTS:
No patient was excluded after randomization. Patient groups did not differ in terms of age, gender, comorbidities and renal function at randomization. The rate of AKI assessed by AKIN criteria was 22.5% in our population. EPO treatment did not significantly modify the difference in uNGAl between 48 hours and randomization compared to placebo [2.5 ng/ml (−17.3; 22.5) vs 0.7 ng/ml (−31.77; 25.15), p = 0.77] and the incidence of AKI was similar. Inflammatory cytokines levels were not influenced by EPO treatment. Mortality and hospital stays were similar between the groups and no adverse event was recorded.

ABSTRACT.CONCLUSION:
In this randomized-controlled trial, α-Epoetin administrated after cardiac surgery, although safe, demonstrated neither nephroprotective nor anti-inflammatory properties.

ABSTRACT.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:
NCT00676234

BODY.BACKGROUND:
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a hematopoietic factor mainly produced by interstitial fibroblasts in the renal cortex and outer medulla. In addition to regulating red blood cell production, this glycoprotein has pleiotropic properties. Amongst these, cytoprotection has been demonstrated in animal brain, kidney and liver
[1,2]. These effects appear to be mediated by the presence of receptors that may respond to higher doses of EPO and alter cell survival, proliferation and inflammation
[2,3].  Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in the intensive care unit. Despite decades of research for a curative treatment, therapy is essentially restricted to supportive care and mortality remains persistently high
[4]. In experimental models of ischemia-reperfusion, recombinant human EPO (r-HuEPO) injection before or during the injury appears to protect against acute kidney injury
[5-7]. Even delayed administration of r-HuEPO, up to 6 hours after a renal ischemic injury, seems to be nephroprotective in rats
[3]. The few data available in humans do not seem to reproduce this protective effect
[8].  Diagnosis of AKI in the intensive care setting is currently performed using RIFLE or AKIN criteria
[9]. Mortality increases with the AKI stages using these criteria
[10]. In patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, AKI is a relevant complication. However, its incidence is very variable (between 1 to 30%) according to definitions and patient's profile but more frequent in valvular versus CABG
[11] surgeries. Even small increases in creatinine levels are associated with substantial decrease in 30-day survival
[12]. As both creatinine levels and quantification of diuresis raise some concern in the ICU setting, novel biomarkers such as Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) are studied to identify patients at risk of developing AKI earlier. The predictive value of these markers for mortality may also be higher than creatinine, even at the time of intensive care admission or postoperatively
[13,14]. Urinary NGAL (uNGAL) seems to be more sensitive than plasmatic dosage. Although, no consensus definition of AKI exists using these biomarkers
[15], NGAL detected patients with subclinical AKI and predicted their mortality despite unchanged serum creatinine
[14]. Additionally, delayed diagnosis of AKI based on change in creatinine could explain some negative interventional trials and the absence of effective therapy in AKI treatment
[16].  An inflammatory response is present in most ICU patients, particularly if they undergo reperfusion injury. IL6 levels are associated with AKI in postoperative cases
[17,18]. In experimental heart ischemia reperfusion and in brain ischemia, EPO treatment decreases the systemic inflammatory response as demonstrated by decreased levels of IL6, IL8 and TNF-α
[19,20].  In this study, we tested the effect of two different doses of r-HuEPO on renal function administered to patients early after cardiac surgery. We used uNGAL as a surrogate of renal function as it has been described to be an earlier and more sensitive marker of AKI than creatinine. We expected to observe a deeper decrease in uNGAL levels in the EPO treatment group, which should be associated with decreasing mortality and shorter hospital stay. Furthermore, we investigated the immunomodulatory properties of EPO after cardiac surgery.

BODY.METHODS:
The study took place in the intensive care unit (ICU) at the University Hospital in Geneva (Switzerland) in 2008–2009. Initially, all adults (>18 years old) admitted to the ICU and at risk for acute kidney injury (mechanical ventilation, sepsis, post-operative state, hemodynamic impairment, previous chronic kidney disease) were screened for inclusion. Patients were excluded from the study in case of: malignant hypertension or systolic blood pressure ≥150 mmHg at enrollment, Hb levels ≥120 g/l at randomization, acute coronary syndrome, pregnancy or urinary output <600 ml/12 h.  Additionally, according to the request of the national drug control organ (Swiss Medic), only patients able to read, ask questions before inclusion and sign a consent form were eligible for inclusion. Patients unable to understand the information for any reason or in an emergency situation that prevented prior consent had to be excluded. Deferred consent or informed consent obtained from health care proxy could not be used. For this reason, although all patients admitted in the ICU were first supposedly eligible for enrollment, finally only patients having "elective" cardiac surgery could be asked for consent prior to randomization and were included in this study. During surgery, patients were managed according to a published protocol
[21]. The study was approved by the ethical committee from Geneva University Hospital and registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT00676234).  Although this was a pilot study, we calculated that 35 patients treated by EPO and 35 controls were necessary to obtain a 95% power with α <0.05, assuming a between group difference of 45 ng/ml in our primary endpoint. Predicting a drop out of 10 patients (5 in each group), we decided to include 80 patients: 40 would be treated by EPO and 40 by placebo.

BODY.METHODS.TREATMENT:
In this pilot study we additionally tested 2 different dosages of EPO in order to estimate a dose-dependent effect. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups or a control group after cardiac surgery. Group 1 received α-Epoetin: 20'000ui, group 2 α-Epoetin: 40'000ui and group 3 (control group) isotonic sodium chloride. All treatments were administered intravenously as a single dose. EPO was diluted in isotonic sodium chloride. A randomization code was generated by a computer 1:1:2 and envelopes with allocation were prepared by the quality of care unit. A nurse from the Nephrology Unit opened the envelopes and prepared the syringes for injection. Investigators and patients were blinded to the treatment. Randomized injection occurred on arrival to the intensive care unit between 1 and 4 hours after surgery.

BODY.METHODS.OUTCOME:
The primary outcome was the change in urinary NGAL concentration from baseline and 48 h after r-HuEPO injection. The secondary outcomes were changes in traditional renal function markers (serum creatinine and cystatine C) and in cytokines levels.

BODY.METHODS.COLLECTED VARIABLES:
All patients had baseline renal function (creatinine) measured at least 24 hours before the surgery. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as a GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 using the MDRD equation, or known kidney disease. Data on comorbidities were collected including hypertension, diabetes and history of ischemic heart disease. ICU and hospital stay in days were recorded as well as mortality and initiation of renal replacement therapy. Patients were followed for 28 days, looking for possible complications related to r-HuEPO injection such as central or peripheral thrombosis or death. AKI was detected from ICU admission to the following week using serum creatinine criteria (AKIN classification). On ICU admission, blood and urine samples were taken prior to injection (= randomization time). The same samples were taken in the morning 48 h and 96 h after the injection. Serum creatinine and cystatine C were immediately measured at 3 intervals (randomization, 48 h and 96 h). Urine was collected and kept at −20° to measure NGAL at randomization and 48 h. Serum was also kept at −20° to measure cytokines at randomization and 96 h. Creatinine was measured using the Jaffe technique and Cystatine C by nephelometry. Rapid NGAL ELISA kit (Bioport Diagnostics-Gentofte, Denmark) was used to measure urinary NGAL (uNGAL)
[22]. Cytometric bead array human inflammatory cytokines kit (BD Biosciences – San Jose, California) was used to measure IL-6 and IL-8. All samples for NGAL and cytokines measures were processed at the same time.

BODY.METHODS.STATISTICS:
Continuous variables were described by mean and standard deviation when distribution was normal. When not normally distributed, continuous variables were described by medians and interquartile ranges (25th-75th). When distribution changed at different times (randomization, 48 h, 96 h), results were reported as median and interquartile range to homogenize descriptions. Numbers and percentages described categorical variables. ANOVA or Kruskall-Wallis test was used to compare continuous variables between the three randomized groups and chi-square was used for categorical variables. Paired test (parametric and non parametric) were performed to assess changes in creatinine, cystatine C, uNGAl and cytokines at different intervals (randomization, 48 h, 96 h). Post-hoc analysis and Bonferroni correction were used when appropriate. The interleukins levels were transformed to logarithmic variables for statistics comparisons in order to achieve a normal distribution.  SPSS17-0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL) was used for the analysis.

BODY.RESULTS:
Over 1 year, 386 patients admitted to ICU were screened for the study but only 149 met the inclusion criteria. Non eligibility was mainly due to inability to give informed consent and Hb ≥ 120 g/l. From the 149 eligible patients, only 80 patients having cardiac surgery, signed consent forms and were randomized after the surgery at ICU admission to placebo (n = 40) or EPO groups (N = 20 in each treatment group). A flow diagram of the study is depicted in Figure
1. Only 1 patient was transferred in another hospital at 48 h. Although we could not have the complete biological follow-up, we could have the information that he did not develop AKI and was alive.  Figure 1Study flow diagram.  Patient's characteristics and peri-operative interventions are shown in Table
1. Results are described separately for each EPO treatment (20'000 ui vs 40'000ui) in order to better analyze an EPO dose-effect. The mean age was 66.3 ± 14.5 years. There were more men than women. Most patients had hypertension (68.8%), some had diabetes (28.8%) or chronic kidney disease (13.8%). Although many had a history of ischemic heart disease (41.3%), the majority of surgeries were for valvular replacement (61.5%). Only 21.6% of patients had coronary bypass surgery and 10.8% had at least 2 different interventions. There were no significant differences between randomization groups with regards to age, sex, diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, diabetes, ischemic heart disease or surgery. Baseline renal function, as assessed by creatinine levels before surgery, was also similar with a mean value of 87.8 ± 28.9 μmol/l. We reported some peri-operative characteristics such as cardiopulmonary bypass length, inotropic or vasopressor use, necessity of transfusions and emergency of the intervention that were all similar between the groups. Some patients in each group received contrast media before surgery (n = 7, p > 0.05), but none received nephrotoxic agents such as aminoglycosides or contrast media after surgery.   Table 1 Population and peri-operative intervention characteristics according to treatment group Variables * All Control EPO 20’000ui EPO 40’000ui P∥   N = 80 N = 40 N = 20 N = 20   Population characteristics:           Age in years 66.3 ± 14.5 64.7 ± 14.7 68.9 ± 12.0 66.5 ± 16.5 0.56 Sex                 Male 56 (70) 27 (67.5) 16 (80) 13 (65) 0.52       Female 24 (30) 13 (32.5) 4 (20) 7 (35)   Hypertension 55 (68.8) 26 (65) 17 (85) 12 (60) 0.18 Diabetes 23 (28.8) 14 (35) 5 (25) 4 (20) 0.44 Chronic kidney disease 11 (13.8) 6 (15) 2 (10) 3 (15) 0.85 Ischemic heart disease 33 (41.3) 17 (42.5) 9 (45) 7 (35) 0.79 Creatinine baseline μmol/l 86.4 ± 25.5 84.7 ± 26.4 92.5 ± 26.1 86.7 ± 24.0 0.79 Intraoperative variables:           Cardiopulmonary bypass min 100 (80–136) 100 (77–120) 96 (77.5-144) 110 (83–143) 0.58 Transfusions administred○ 28 (40) 17 (50) 6 (33.3) 5 (27.8) 0.24 Inotropic agent use 16 (20.3) 6 (15) 4 (21.1) 6 (30) 0.39 Vasopressor agent use 18 (22.8) 9 (22.5) 4 (21.1) 5 (25) 0.96 Urgency of operation 19 (23.8) 7 (17.5) 5(25) 7 (35) 0.32 *Age and creatinine are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and length of cardiopulmonary bypass as median (25 th -75 th percentiles). Categorical variables are written as numbers of participants and percentages (%). ∥ p compares the 3 treatment groups. ○ information missing for 10 patients, 6 in the control group:% calculated for a total of 70 patients. 

BODY.RESULTS.OUTCOMES, AKI AND RENAL FUNCTION:
There were no differences in hemoglobin, creatinine, cystatine C and urinary NGAL levels between the groups at randomization (Table
2).   Table 2 Patients’ evolution during follow-up: hemoglobin, renal biomarkers and clinical outcomes Variables Control EPO 20’000ui EPO 40’000ui P* Median (25 th -75 th percentiles ) N = 40 N = 20 N = 20   Hemoglobin R g/l 97.5 (87.5-105.8) 100.5 (92.3-107) 98 (85–107) 0.41 Hemoglobin last g/l 100.5 (96.3-113.8) 100.0 (93–109) 101.5 (90.8-114.8) 0.69 Renal biomarkers         Creatinine R μmol/l 78 (61–98) 94 (74.5-102) 91.5 (67.8-114.3) 0.29 Creatinine 48 h μmol/l 79 (65.8-88.8) 78 (62–98) 82.5 (66–114.5) 0.23 Creatinine 96 h μmol/l 77.5 (63.3-85.8) 75 (65–92) 87 (72.8-100.8) 0.53 Cystatine C Rmg/l 1.1 (0.9-1.4) 1.2 (1.1-1.5) 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 0.60 Cystatine C 48 h - mg/l 1.2 (1.1-1.4) 1.3 (1.1-1.6) 1.3 (1.1-1.6) 0.25 Cystatine C 96 h mg/l 1.3 (1.1-1.4) 1.2 (1.1-1.5) 1.3 (1.1-1.7) 0.80 Urinary Ngal R ng/ml 21 (5.7-44.3) 43.3 (18.3-62.9) 11 (0–76) 0.18 Urinary Ngal 48 h ng/ml 26.8 (12–46.7) 15.7 (2.6-39) 26 (6.2-58.8) 0.47 Clinical outcomes         Hospital stay in days 14.5 (11–21.8) 16.5 (10.8- 26.8) 15.5 (10.3-22.5) 0.96 ICU stay in days 1 (1–3) 2.5 (1.3- 5) 1 (1–3.8) 0.07 Acute Kidney Injury  ¤ 7 (17.5%) 5 (25%) 6 (30%) 0.53 Death 2 (5%) 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 0.74 *p compares the 3 treatment groups. R: randomization. 48 h: 48 hours after randomization. 96 h: 96 hours after randomization. ICU: Intensive care Unit. ¤ In stage 1: n = 15; in stage 2: n = 3 (n = 2 in EPO 40’000 and n = 1 in EPO 20’000 groups).   Incidence of AKI was 22.5% in the studied population (n = 18). Most AKI episodes were stage 1 (n = 15) and stage 2 (n = 3) and occurred during the first week of admission. No AKI episodes required renal replacement therapy. Five patients died early during the follow up period (mortality 6.25%). ICU stay was usually short (few hours to 20 days) and hospital stay ranged from 5 to 45 days. No secondary effect could be assigned to r-HuEPO injection during the follow up and no thrombotic event was recorded.  Hemoglobin, renal parameters and clinical outcome according to EPO treatment are presented in Table
2.  R-HuEPO at either of the two doses had no significant effect on the incidence of AKI. Moreover, r-HuEPO treatment did not significantly modify the renal function parameters when compared to control patients as assessed by the absolute creatinine, cystatin c and urinary NGAL levels at 48 and 96 hours, in each group. There were no significant differences between the groups at any time during follow-up with respect to changes in creatinine, cystatin c and urinary NGAl levels. Although there was a significant difference in the change of urinary NGAL levels between the EPO 20'000 and the EPO 40'000 group (p = 0.01), there was no significant differences with the placebo group (Figure
2).  Figure 2Changes in renal biomarkers at randomization, 48 h (R-48 h) and 96 h (R-96 h) according to treatment group. Panels a, b and c represent creatinine, cystatine C and urinary NGAL differences, respectively (*outliers). NS: non significant.  We pooled the two EPO doses and confirmed that r-HuEPO did not significantly modify uNGAL median levels between 48 hours and randomization: 2.5 ng/ml (−17.30; 22.50) vs 0.7 ng/ml (−31.78; 25.15); p = 0.767. Creatinine and cystatin C levels changed equally in both groups at all time points. Incidence of AKI during follow up using AKIN criteria was similar in placebo and rh-HuEPO treated patients. Cytokines levels were also similar during follow up in both groups. R-HuEPO did not influence outcomes such as death, length of hospital or ICU stays.  Hemoglobin levels, at randomization and at hospital discharge, were the same in the 3 groups.  Patients diagnosed with AKI during follow-up presented with significantly higher creatinine, cystatine C and urinary NGAL levels at ICU admission (randomization time) as shown in Table
3. The levels of all renal biomarkers remained higher during the 48 h-96 h period in patients with AKI.  Table 3 Levels of renal biomarkers during follow up classified by diagnosis of AKI Variables* No AKI AKI P   N = 62 N = 18   Creatinine R μmol/l 79.4 ± 19.8 116 ± 39.9 =0.001 Creatinine 48 h μmol/l 74.0 ± 19.7 142.1 ± 50.8 <0.001 Creatinine 96 h μmol/l 74.1 ± 18.1 129.7 ± 46.4 <0.001 Cystatin C R mg/l 1.14 ± 0 .24 1.67 ± 0.44 <0.001 Cystatin C 48 h mg/l 1.20 ± 0.27 1.73 ± 0.36 <0.001 Cystatin C 96 h mg/l 1.20 ± 0.24 1.90 ± 0.49 <0.001 uNGAL R ng/ml 18.9 (0–43.5) 57.6 (26.5-138.8) <0.001 uNGAL 48 h ng/ml 17.4 (5.8-40.9) 40.2 (21.1-102.6) 0.009 R: randomization. 48 h: 48 hours after randomization. 96 h: 96 hours after randomization. AKI: acute kidney injury. *Cystatine C is expressed as mean ± standard deviation. uNGAL is expressed as median and (25 th -75 th  percentiles).   Similarly, the five patients that died during follow-up demonstrated higher levels of both cystatine C (1.76 +/−0.47 mg/l vs. 1.23+/−0.34 mg/l, p = 0.004) and urinary NGAL (103.2 ng/ml vs. 22.2 ng/ml, p = 0.004) at randomization, whereas creatinine levels were not statistically different (86.6 ± 28.8 μmol/l vs. 102.3 ± 33.3 μmol/l, p = 0.24).

BODY.RESULTS.EVOLUTION OF PLASMA IL6 AND IL8 IN THE TREATMENT GROUPS:
IL6 and IL8 levels were similar at randomization between placebo and EPO treated patients. We obtained the same results when the three groups were analyzed separately (Table
4). The levels of these cytokines significantly decreased during follow-up in all groups. No difference was observed on the levels of these cytokines at either time-point after r-HuEPO treatments. Furthermore, IL6 and IL8 levels at randomization were similar in all patients regardless of AKI (Figure
3), whereas IL6 levels at 96 hours were significantly higher in patients with AKI [124.5 (51.7-213.9)pgl/ml vs 33.8 (19.8-138.9)pg/ml, p = 0.027] (Figure
3) IL6 levels at randomization were much higher in patients who died [947 (351.7-1311.1) vs 198 (142.7-283.2), p = 0.007], while IL8 levels were slightly higher [197.1 (159.9-189.1) vs 87.9 (49.8-137.5), p = 0.046].   Table 4 Levels of interleukins during follow-up Variables * All Control EPO 20’000 EPO 40’000 P∥ pg/ml N = 80 N = 40 N = 20 N = 20   IL-6 R 207.7 (144.1-301.2) 177.8 (104.7-351.4) 229.5 (159.8-342.9) 250 (177.8-280.3) 0.54 IL-6 96 h 51.7 (20.5-143.4) 48.3 (18.9-139.9) 129.6 (20.5-248.6) 50.7 (27.7-135.3) 0.46 IL-8 R 98.4 (50.4-154.3) 98.4 (46.3-142.8) 105.4 (56–220.4) 96.6 (52.0-148.9) 0.81 IL-8 96 h 40.1 (21.9-124.4) 41.4 (22,5-121.1) 62.3 (20.9-172.4) 30.9 (17.7-104.7) 0.40 *Expressed as median (25 th -75 th  percentiles). R: randomization. 96 h: 96 hours after randomization. ∥  p compares the 3 treatment groups using log transformation.   Figure 3Interleukin levels over time in presence or absence of AKI. Panel a and panel b represent IL6 and IL 8 at randomization and 96 hours, respectively, in patient with and without AKI (*outliers). p compares groups using log transformation.

BODY.DISCUSSION:
R-HuEPO treatment has renoprotective properties in experimental ischemic renal injury when given before, during or even after the injury
[5-7]. The effect of r-HuEPO on prevention and treatment of AKI in patients is still very controversial. In our study, we gave r-HuEPO shortly after cardiac surgery which was inefficient in preventing mild forms of AKI, independent of the dose used. Moreover, EPO did not modify NGAL urinary levels, nor did it reduce hospital stay and mortality. This contrasts with a recent study
[23] where erythropoietin given at the time of operation was efficient in preventing acute kidney injury, reducing ICU stays and decreasing mortality in cardiac surgery patients. However, timing of administration and type of r-HuEPO (epoetin-beta) differed from our study protocol. Another interventional study in high risk ICU patients, including patients with miscellaneous causes of kidney injuries, demonstrated that EPO was ineffective at preventing mild or severe AKI and did not modify mortality and need for dialysis
[24], similarly to our study. Notably in this study, patients were selected based on the rise in tubular biomarkers, and therefore were probably also treated after the onset of renal injury. In kidney transplant recipients, EPO administered prior to transplantation did not decrease the rate of delayed graft function
[25]. Altogether, these studies show that erythropoietin may have some beneficial effect in human AKI when given before the ischemic injury. However, even an early post injury treatment, in opposition to what is observed in rodents, appears ineffective. This would limit the applicability of EPO treatment post-intervention in prevention of AKI in ICU patients or should lead to a more thorough identification of high-risk patients before intervention or before other procedures with a renal risk such as contrast media administration. Nevertheless, these conclusions are supported only by one positive monocentric study
[23] and more data are necessary. The ongoing EPO-TBI study (NCT 00987454) may provide an answer to this question. This study aims to include 606 patients having traumatic brain injury to evaluate EPO for brain protection but renal biomarkers will be also analyzed
[8]. Finally, a study testing the effect of r-HuEPO using a scoring system identifying high-risk patients would be desirable.  Change in urinary NGAL levels was a primary outcome and pooled data showed no effect of r-HuEPO on uNGAL levels compared to placebo during the observation time. We observed that α-Epoetin 20'000ui had a tendency toward decreasing urinary NGAL in comparison to the higher dose, but not in comparison to placebo. The difference between high and low doses of r-HuEPO has not been described previously and we do not have a clear explanation for this result. This could be a statistical difference due to the small sample as clinically relevant parameters (death, length of stay, ICU admission, AKI incidence) were similar between the groups, although we cannot formally exclude a dose-dependent effect. The choice of NGAL levels as a primary outcome was made on the presumption of a better sensitivity of this test for AKI detection. However, establishing the sensitivity of NGAL is difficult given the lack of current gold standard for AKI diagnosis and we believe that NGAL levels over time may be of interest given its prognostic value for outcome
[26]. In our patients we only measured NGAL, IL6, IL8 and cystatine C at ICU admission. Baseline values were not available. However, in patients suffering from AKI, both NGAL and cystatine C levels were significantly higher at admission than in non-AKI patients. Similar observations were made in patients that died during the observation period. Despite the low number of events, this tends to confirm that NGAL and cystatine C levels at admission (3–4 hours after surgery) are more valuable than creatinine levels in predicting AKI and mortality, as shown in other studies
[13,14,27].  In our study, the incidence of AKI (all stages) was 22.5%, but only three patients suffered from stage 2 AKI and no patient required dialysis. The incidence of severe AKI was low despite the high prevalence of diabetes and CKD and that most of the patients underwent valvular replacement. This may be related to the inclusion of elective patients only due to strict exclusion criteria. Furthermore no nephrotoxic drug was prescribed nor was a contrast agent administered during the observation period that could have increased the rate of renal events. Although 7 patients received contrast medium before surgery they did not have a higher rate of AKI. Recent observations also establish a lower incidence of severe AKI after cardiac surgery than previously reported, despite a remaining important repercussion of low grade AKI on mortality and costs
[28]. This may be due to improvement in anesthetic care and surgical techniques. Given this limitation, we cannot demonstrate a protective effect of r-HuEPO on severe AKI after cardiac surgery. However, our study demonstrates that stage 1 AKI, a relatively frequent condition after heart surgery that is correlated to mortality, length of stay and costs, is not prevented by r-HuEPO treatment.  Erythropoietin has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects
[19,20,29]. In this study, IL6 and IL8 levels were elevated postoperatively and decreased thereafter. Administration of r-HuEPO shortly after surgery did not modify the plasma profile of these cytokines. As IL6 is emerging as a predictive factor for acute kidney injury and adverse post-operative outcomes
[17,30], the absence of a beneficial effect of EPO on its levels parallels the unchanged incidence of acute kidney injury and mortality. This, together with the absence of a protective effect on renal function, does not support the use of r-HuEPO to decrease the anti-inflammatory response.  Our study has several limitations. First the number of events was quite small and for that reason the study may be underpowered even with the use of a sensitive primary outcome measure of change in urinary NGAL levels since the standard deviation of uNGAl was higher than expected. Secondly, we cannot exclude the presence of elevated NGAL levels before randomization, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes, as blood was not taken from patients prior to surgery. Nevertheless diabetic patients did not show increased levels of uNGAL at randomization. As for CKD patients, data are difficult to analyze because of a small sample size. In each treatment group, the uNGAL level was higher at randomization in patients with CKD but the change in uNGAL level at 48 h and randomization or between treatment groups was not significantly different. Finally, we did not correct uNGAL for urinary creatinine levels, as this correction did not modify sensitivity of uNGAL in similar settings
[27]. Nevertheless, this study is one of the few randomized studies studying EPO effects on renal function and is the only one testing the effect of EPO on inflammatory markers such as cytokines.

BODY.CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, administration of two different doses of α-Epoetin:to adult patients after cardiac surgery did neither decrease markers of renal injury or renal function such as urinary NGAL, cystatine C and creatinine, nor modify the incidence of stages 1 and 2 AKI. In addition, EPO did not modify pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. Erythropoietin administered after an ischemic injury is probably ineffective in patients to prevent low stage AKI and improve survival.

BODY.ABBREVIATIONS:
EPO: Erythropoeitin; r-HuEPO: Recombinant human erythropoietin; AKI: Acute kidney injury; NGAL: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; uNGAL: Urinary Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; CKD: Chronic kidney disease; ICU: Intensive care unit.

BODY.COMPETING INTERESTS:
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

BODY.AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS:
SdS and BP collected the data, analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. LW collected the data. JP and JAR contributed to designing the study and recruiting the patients. PYM and PS designed the study, collected the data and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

BODY.PRE-PUBLICATION HISTORY:
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:  http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/13/132/prepub

Question: Compared to Control what was the result of Erythropoietin on Acute kidney injury?
Evidence: and the incidence of AKI was similar.
Answer: no significant difference