TITLE: Pharmacogenomics of Hypertension: A Genome‐Wide, Placebo‐Controlled Cross‐Over Study, Using Four Classes of Antihypertensive Drugs

  ABSTRACT.BACKGROUND:
Identification of genetic markers of antihypertensive drug responses could assist in individualization of hypertension treatment.

ABSTRACT.METHODS AND RESULTS:
We conducted a genome‐wide association study to identify gene loci influencing the responsiveness of 228 male patients to 4 classes of antihypertensive drugs. The Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension (GENRES) study is a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled cross‐over study where each subject received amlodipine, bisoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan, each as a monotherapy, in a randomized order. Replication analyses were performed in 4 studies with patients of European ancestry (PEAR Study, N=386; GERA I and II Studies, N=196 and N=198; SOPHIA Study, N=372). We identified 3 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms within the ACY3 gene that showed associations with bisoprolol response reaching genome‐wide significance (P<5×10−8); however, this could not be replicated in the PEAR Study using atenolol. In addition, 39 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms showed P values of 10−5 to 10−7. The 20 top‐associated single‐nucleotide polymorphisms were different for each antihypertensive drug. None of these top single‐nucleotide polymorphisms co‐localized with the panel of >40 genes identified in genome‐wide association studies of hypertension. Replication analyses of GENRES results provided suggestive evidence for a missense variant (rs3814995) in the NPHS1 (nephrin) gene influencing losartan response, and for 2 variants influencing hydrochlorothiazide response, located within or close to the ALDH1A3 (rs3825926) and CLIC5 (rs321329) genes.

ABSTRACT.CONCLUSIONS:
These data provide some evidence for a link between biology of the glomerular protein nephrin and antihypertensive action of angiotensin receptor antagonists and encourage additional studies on aldehyde dehydrogenase–mediated reactions in antihypertensive drug action.

BODY.INTRODUCTION:
By 2010, elevated blood pressure (BP) became the leading risk factor of disease burden on a global basis.1 The insidious nature of hypertension is substantiated by its increasing prevalence, its mostly asymptomatic nature, and its poor drug control. Indeed, globally more than 1 billion people suffer from hypertension, but only 40% to 50% of those on therapy reach the targets of treatment.2–3 This is most unfortunate since even a small lowering of elevated BP results in significant reduction of cardiovascular events.  Family, twin, and adoption studies have suggested that heritability accounts for 30% to 50% of interindividual variation of BP.4–6 Recent extensive genome‐wide association studies have revealed >40 genetic loci associated with essential hypertension,4–6 but even combined they account for only 2% of variability of BP, and no variant is of proven clinical value in guiding antihypertensive drug treatment. Until 2009, pharmacogenomic studies of hypertension suffered from narrow selection of candidate genes, small sample sizes, and weaknesses in study design.7 In subsequent studies, suggestive but inconsistent associations were reported when panels of gene variants selected by data from the hypertension genome‐wide association studies were screened in the Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension (GENRES)8 and Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR)9 cohorts. Recently, the first applications of genome‐wide association studies principles in pharmacogenomics of hypertension have taken place,10–12 but there is still a need for controlled randomized studies with adequate replication of data using results from other laboratories.  The GENRES study is a randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over, placebo‐controlled study of 228 hypertensive men who received 4 different classes of antihypertensive drugs (a diuretic, β‐blocker, calcium‐channel blocker, and angiotensin receptor antagonist), each as a monotherapy, in a rotational manner.13 Both office (OBP) and 24‐hour ambulatory (ABP) blood pressure responses were measured. We here report genome‐wide analysis of association of 0.7M single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to the different antihypertensive drug responses, and also provide results from attempts to replicate findings using meta‐analysis data from the PEAR,14 Genetic Epidemiology of Responses to Antihypertensives (GERA) I,15 GERA II,10 and Study of the Pharmacogenomics in Italian hypertensive patients treated with the Angiotensin receptor blocker losartan (SOPHIA)16 studies.

BODY.METHODS.STUDY PARTICIPANTS:
The design of the GENRES Study with initial clinical and biochemical data has been described previously.13,17 In brief, a total of 313 moderately hypertensive Finnish men (aged 35 to 60 years) were initially screened.13 Inclusion criteria were diastolic BP ≥95 mm Hg in repeated measurements or use of antihypertensive medication. Exclusion criteria were use of 3 or more antihypertensive drugs, secondary hypertension, or significant comorbidity. There was no evident heart, cerebrovascular, liver, pulmonary, or kidney disease, and no patient had drug‐treated diabetes. No participant had signs of abuse of alcohol or drugs. Each study participant received losartan 50 mg, bisoprolol 5 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, and amlodipine 5 mg daily, each as a monotherapy in randomized order for 4 weeks. The study started with a 4‐week run‐in placebo period, and all 4 drug treatment periods were separated by 4‐week placebo periods. Twenty‐four‐hour ABP readings were recorded at the end of each treatment period with a device equipped with a QRS complex detector and a position sensor (Diasys Integra; Novacor, Rueil‐Malmaison, France); in addition, OBP measurements were carried out with repeated measurements after a 30‐minute rest in the sitting position using a semiautomatic oscillometric device. In this study, ABP responses to the 4 monotherapies were analyzed. The 228 subjects who were successfully genotyped and had ABP response data from at least 1 drug treatment period are included in this study. Of these subjects, 212, 204, and 177 had ABP response data from 2, 3, and 4 drug treatments, respectively.  The clinical part of the GENRES study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (1996) at Helsinki University Central Hospital between years 1999 and 2004. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Helsinki University Central Hospital and the National Agency for Medicines of Finland. All subjects gave signed informed consent before any study‐related activities.  PEAR is a study of mild‐‐to‐‐moderate hypertensives, with diastolic OBP >90 mm Hg (and ≤110 mm Hg) and diastolic home BP >85 mm Hg. The details of the study design have been described previously.14 In brief, the patients had no history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes and were between the ages of 17 and 65 years. After an average washout period of 28 days, they had baseline data collected, which included measurement of home, office, and 24‐hour ABP, along with collection of biological samples. They were then randomized to atenolol 50 mg daily or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg daily. Following 3 weeks on this dose, those with BP >120/70 mm Hg had the dose doubled, followed by an additional 6 weeks of treatment, after which BP data were collected along with biological samples. The 24‐hour ABP data were used for this analysis. Only subjects of European ancestry were included in the present study.  For each of the GERA I and II studies, 300 whites (in Rochester, MN) and 300 African Americans (in Atlanta, GA) were enrolled.18–19 The participants had uncomplicated primary hypertension, stage 1 to 2, and were 30 to 59.9 years of age. They were instructed to discontinue previous antihypertensive medications for ≥4 weeks. Once stable elevation of the BP was achieved (diastolic OBP ≥90 mm Hg), the study drug was administered orally: hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily for 4 weeks or candesartan 16 mg daily for 2 weeks followed by 32 mg daily for an 4 additional weeks. At the end of the drug‐free and drug‐treatment periods, 3 readings of BP were made by a trained assistant after the participant had been seated quietly for at least 5 minutes. The difference between averages of the second and third diastolic BP readings taken before and at the end of drug treatment was calculated as the BP response. Only subjects of European ancestry were included in the present study.  The SOPHIA Study is a study of mild‐to‐moderate, asymptomatic, never‐treated hypertensive patients (85% of participants), or patients out of treatment for at least 6 months (15% of participants).16 At the screening visit (week ‐8), participants ranging 18 to 59 years of age had to display systolic OBP from 140 to 179 mm Hg and diastolic OBP from 90 to 109 mm Hg. At each visit, OBP was measured 3 times, using a certified electronic device, with the subject in the sitting position after 5 minutes' rest. During a run‐in period of 8 weeks, the participants followed a diet program that provided 100 to 140 mEq of sodium and 50 to 70 mEq of potassium daily to minimize the lifestyle differences. At the end of this period, 50 mg/day of losartan as open‐label was prescribed for 4 weeks.

BODY.METHODS.GENOTYPING METHODS:
The DNA samples of 228 GENRES study subjects were successfully genotyped (success rates >99%) at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Technology Centre, University of Helsinki using the Illumina HumanOmniExpress‐12 BeadChip (Illumina, Inc, San Diego, CA). The genotypes (NCBI build 37, hg19) were called and quality controlled using GenomeStudio v. 2011.1 software (Illumina, Inc) and in‐house‐developed database tools. Further quality steps, including identity‐by‐state clustering and gender check, were performed using Plink software and PLINK v1.07 toolset.20 Of the total of 709 357 genotyped autosomal SNPs, 707 658 passed these quality‐control steps. After this, SNPs with Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium P value <1×10−5 (393 SNPs) and minor allele frequency <0.01 (75 421 SNPs) were excluded, which resulted in 631 844 autosomal SNPs that were used for analysis.  DNA samples from PEAR were genotyped using Illumina Human Omni1‐Quad BeadChip (Illumina) as previously described.11 DNA samples from GERA I and II study participants were genotyped using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 6.0 Array Sets.10–11 SOPHIA samples were genotyped using the Illumina Human1M‐Duo array (Illumina) and imputed using MACH software and the HapMap CEU haplotypes (release 22) as reference.

BODY.METHODS.STATISTICAL ANALYSES:
As the first step of the present study, systolic (ASBP) and diastolic (ADBP) 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure responses to each of the 4 monotherapies were analyzed separately in the GENRES Study (discovery sample). The BP response was calculated as BP after 4 weeks' drug treatment minus mean BP after placebo periods. The mean BP level of all (up to 4) placebo periods, as opposed to the 1 preceding placebo period, was used as the baseline level to reduce BP variation. The approach was supported by several analyses. First, the BP responses to study drugs showed clearly lower variation when mean of all placebo periods was used as the baseline level (Table S1). Second, compared with the other drugs, amlodipine seemed to have a small carry‐over effect (≈−1.5/−0.5 mm Hg) based on placebo BP levels 4 weeks after amlodipine treatment (Table S2). The randomized cross‐over design and the use of all placebo periods as the baseline level eliminates any systematic effect of this finding on the results. In addition, the effect was probably even smaller after an additional 4 weeks when BP response to the next study drug was assessed. Third, the higher variation of placebo BP levels when only 1 placebo period was used can be seen in Table S2 as higher SDs. Finally, the preceding study treatment and the order of the drug treatment periods had no effect on BP response to any of the study drug when they were tested with regression analysis (GLM Univariate procedure of IBM SPSS Statistics program, version 19).  For the genome‐wide analyses, ASBP and ADBP response residuals were generated using IBM SPSS Statistics program and stepwise linear regression. The following covariates were tested with P<0.10 as an inclusion condition: corresponding placebo ABP (mean of all periods), age, earlier use of antihypertensive medication (coded as 0/1), current smoking (coded as 0/1), body mass index, daily urinary sodium excretion after the first placebo period, and serum creatinine level after the first placebo period. For non‐normally distributed covariates, normalized values were used. The covariates selected for calculation of BP response residuals (in mm Hg) for each study drug are listed in Table S3.  The genome‐wide association analysis was done using covariate‐adjusted BP responses and linear regression under an additive genetic model with program PLINK.20 For each of the 4 study drugs, we report here the 20 genetic loci with the lowest P values based on either ASBP or ADBP responses. P values <5×10−8 were considered as significant at the genome‐wide level.  In the second step, replication analyses of the 20 best loci associated with losartan, bisoprolol, and hydrochlorothiazide responses were carried out using the data from PEAR, GERA I, GERA II, and SOPHIA studies. In each case, the analyses were confined to study participants of European ancestry only, and age, gender, baseline BP, and principal components to account for ancestry were used as covariates. Accordingly, we replicated losartan/GENRES data using losartan/SOPHIA and candesartan/GERA II data, bisoprolol/GENRES data using atenolol/PEAR data, and hydrochlorothiazide/GENRES data using both hydrochlorothiazide/PEAR and hydrochlorothiazide/GERA I data. Successful replication was defined as P values below the Bonferroni‐corrected level of 2.5×10−4 (number of individual tests: 99 SNPs in 5 replication study analyses×SBP+DBP responses=198) and the same direction of effect. Suggestive replication was defined as P values <0.05 and the same direction of effect.  As the third step, meta‐analyses of the top 20 GENRES 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure response SNPs in all available studies were performed using inverse‐variance model with fixed effects in METAL.21 We defined significant results as P values <5×10−8. In addition, P values <1×10−5 were considered to represent a suggestive association.

BODY.RESULTS.STUDY SUBJECTS:
Principal demographic and clinical data from the subjects of the GENRES Study are summarized in Table 1. The patients were all males, had a slightly elevated body mass index (none had body mass index >32 kg/m2) and a moderate hypertension (mean OBP 152/100 mm Hg). No patient had drug‐treated diabetes or reduced kidney glomerular filtration rate. The BP reductions, as assessed by the ABP measurements, ranged from 4.8/1.7 mm Hg (hydrochlorothiazide) to 11.1/8.3 mm Hg (bisoprolol). Note that the study design used fixed doses of antihypertensive drugs, and no attempt was made to use equipotent doses.   Table 1. Characteristics of the Subjects From the Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension (GENRES) Study Number of subjects 228 Age, y 50.6 (6.4) Body mass index, kg/m 2 26.7 (2.7) ABP during placebo periods (systolic/diastolic, mm Hg) 135 (10)/93 (6) OBP during placebo periods (systolic/diastolic, mm Hg) 152 (13)/100 (7) ABP responses (systolic/diastolic, mm Hg) Amlodipine (N=205) −7.4 (7.2)/−4.9 (4.0) Bisoprolol (N=207) −11.1 (6.2)/−8.3 (4.2) Hydrochlorothiazide (N=206) −4.8 (6.3)/−1.7 (4.1) Losartan (N=203) −9.1 (6.7)/−6.1 (4.7) dU‐sodium, mmol/24 h 173 (70) Fasting serum glucose, mmol/L 5.4 (0.6) Serum creatinine, mmol/L 86 (13) Subjects with genome‐wide genetic data and ambulatory blood pressure recordings after at least 1 antihypertensive monotherapy are included. All subjects were males. Data are presented as mean (SD). ABP indicates 24‐h ambulatory blood pressure; dU, daily urinary excretion of; OBP, office blood pressure. 

BODY.RESULTS.FIRST STEP: GENOME‐WIDE ASSOCIATION ANALYSES IN GENRES:
Manhattan plots providing genome‐wide associations of ≈630 000 SNPs with the antihypertensive responses to losartan, bisoprolol, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide are illustrated in Figure 1. Three SNPs on chromosome 11 (rs2514036, rs948445, and rs2514037) provided evidence for association reaching genome‐wide significance for ASBP response to bisoprolol (Figure 1C and Table 2). These 3 SNPs map within the coding and regulatory regions of ACY3, coding for aminoacylase III. Altogether, 42 SNPs in 31 distinct regions were identified having at least 1 SNP associated with the treatment response at P≤1×10−5 (Figure 1 and Tables 2 through 5).   Table 2. Single‐Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Bisoprolol in the Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension (GENRES) Study P  Value Rank SNP Chr Position (Build 37) N CA/NCA CAF SBP/DBP BP Response Other SNPs From the Same Locus With Low  P  Values ( r 2  Value With the Listed SNP) β SE P  Value 1 rs2514036 11 67 415 054 207 G/A 0.11 SBP −5.4 ±0.9 2.0E‐8 rs948445 ( r 2 =1.00), rs2514037 ( r 2 =0.61) DBP −3.1 ±0.6 1.4E‐6 2 rs7268800 20 38 580 738 207 G/A 0.42 SBP −2.1 ±0.6 5.2E‐4 rs6071822 ( r 2 =0.52), rs211841 ( r 2 =0.37), rs211840 ( r 2 =0.37), rs7261610 ( r 2 =0.61), rs11699371 ( r 2 =0.58), rs16988591 ( r 2 =0.68), rs11699530 ( r 2 =1.00), rs958523 ( r 2 =0.94), rs6124201 ( r 2 =0.68) DBP −1.9 ±0.4 2.1E‐6* 3 rs12967284 18 12 532 098 207 A/G 0.25 SBP 2.9 ±0.6 7.8E‐6 rs11663391 ( r 2 =0.95) DBP 2.0 ±0.4 3.6E‐6* 4 rs4357510 1 192 612 394 207 A/C 0.06 SBP −5.4 ±1.2 1.4E‐5 DBP −3.8 ±0.8 4.2E‐6* 5 rs2506143 10 33 468 169 207 G/A 0.09 SBP 3.4 ±1.0 4.7E‐4 rs2506140 ( r 2 =1.0), rs2506144 ( r 2 =1.0) DBP 3.0 ±0.6 4.7E‐6* 6 rs2029870 6 164 888 366 204 A/G 0.14 SBP −3.4 ±0.8 4.3E‐5 rs10945994 ( r 2 =0.83) DBP −2.6 ±0.5 5.0E‐6* 7 rs7984003 13 82 866 573 206 A/G 0.25 SBP 3.1 ±0.7 5.4E‐6* rs7984202 ( r 2 =0.42), rs9531328 ( r 2 =0.34), rs7993722 ( r 2 =0.34) DBP 2.1 ±0.5 5.8E‐6 8 rs11777699 8 6 714 699 206 G/A 0.50 SBP −1.8 ±0.6 1.4E‐3 DBP −1.7 ±0.4 5.9E‐6* 9 rs10519585 5 118 676 529 207 G/A 0.31 SBP −2.5 ±0.6 5.5E‐5 DBP −1.9 ±0.4 6.6E‐6* 10 rs6501061 16 8 092 171 207 G/A 0.09 SBP 4.7 ±1.0 9.9E‐6* DBP 2.3 ±0.7 1.5E‐3 11 rs16918900 8 54 147 242 207 A/G 0.01 SBP −8.4 ±2.4 6.9E‐4 DBP −7.3 ±1.6 1.1E‐5* 12 rs2194860 4 109 948 511 207 A/G 0.19 SBP 3.2 ±0.7 1.1E‐5* DBP 1.9 ±0.5 1.7E‐4 13 rs2765115 13 24 529 399 207 G/A 0.16 SBP −3.7 ±0.8 1.2E‐5* rs6490847 ( r 2 =0.89), rs2147990 ( r 2 =0.49), rs2765089 ( r 2 =0.33), DBP −2.3 ±0.6 8.1E‐5 rs2492084 ( r 2 =0.47), rs9510968 ( r 2 =0.32), rs2765114 ( r 2 =0.59), rs2765119 ( r 2 =0.37) 14 rs17642669 5 140 628 277 207 G/A 0.06 SBP −3.9 ±1.3 2.1E‐3 rs17629216 ( r 2 =1.0) DBP −3.7 ±0.8 1.4E‐5* 15 rs7895038 10 2 432 266 207 G/A 0.41 SBP −2.7 ±0.6 1.5E‐5* rs826474 ( r 2 =0.47), rs826489 ( r 2 =0.52) DBP −1.4 ±0.4 1.1E‐3 16 rs150210 21 19 362 312 207 G/A 0.28 SBP −2.7 ±0.6 1.8E‐5* DBP −1.5 ±0.4 7.2E‐4 17 rs10910862 1 181 045 421 207 A/G 0.06 SBP −5.1 ±1.3 9.0E‐5 DBP −3.7 ±0.8 1.9E‐5* 18 rs2148117 10 27 213 946 207 G/A 0.02 SBP −9.1 ±2.1 1.9E‐5* DBP −5.8 ±1.4 5.6E‐5 19 rs1150433 3 163 653 210 207 A/G 0.13 SBP −3.6 ±0.9 8.9E‐5 DBP −2.6 ±0.6 2.0E‐5* 20 rs969981 17 63 818 989 206 A/G 0.16 SBP −3.3 ±0.7 2.0E‐5* DBP −1.6 ±0.5 2.2E‐3 Twenty loci with the lowest  P  values based on either systolic or diastolic response are listed. BP indicates blood pressure; CA, coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NCA, noncoded allele; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism. Lowest  P  value of each locus.   Table 3. Single‐Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Losartan in the GENRES Study P  Value Rank SNP Chr Position (Build 37) N CA/NCA CAF SBP/DBP BP Response Other SNPs From the Same Locus With Low  P  Values ( r 2  Value With the Listed SNP) β SE P  Value 1 rs1370555 15 97 049 985 203 G/A 0.40 SBP −2.6 ±0.6 4.4E‐5 DBP −2.1 ±0.4 6.2E‐7* 2 rs7086428 10 130 778 452 203 A/G 0.37 SBP 3.3 ±0.6 6.5E‐7* DBP 1.7 ±0.5 2.8E‐4 3 rs4953045 2 44 268 800 203 G/A 0.25 SBP −3.5 ±0.7 1.1E‐6* rs17424646 ( r 2 =0.28), rs4131366 ( r 2 =0.32), rs17496908( r 2 =0.59) DBP −2.2 ±0.5 1.0E‐5 4 rs711513 7 109 368 769 200 G/A 0.36 SBP −2.4 ±0.7 5.6E‐4 rs2841921 ( r 2 =0.95), rs10953645 ( r 2 =0.39) DBP −2.3 ±0.5 1.3E‐6* 5 rs12814605 12 63 438 145 203 A/G 0.15 SBP −4.0 ±0.9 1.4E‐5 rs1249935 ( r 2 =0.33), rs12813083 ( r 2 =0.30), rs699615 ( r 2 =0.36) DBP −3.0 ±0.6 2.3E‐6* rs699618 ( r 2 =0.37), rs12823849 ( r 2 =0.44), rs12815621 ( r 2 =1.00) 6 rs2279989 9 1 041 524 203 A/G 0.10 SBP −4.0 ±1.0 1.6E‐4 DBP −3.3 ±0.7 3.3E‐6* 7 rs7597606 2 41 836 313 202 A/G 0.40 SBP 2.9 ±0.6 3.3E‐6* DBP 1.4 ±0.4 8.5E‐4 8 rs1559557 2 57 332 673 203 G/A 0.32 SBP 3.3 ±0.7 4.8E‐6* rs1424642 ( r 2 =0.70), rs17048681 ( r 2 =0.74) DBP 1.9 ±0.5 2.1E‐4 9 rs1432232 2 137 799 664 203 A/C 0.18 SBP 3.8 ±0.8 5.8E‐6* rs1347033 ( r 2 =0.79) DBP 2.2 ±0.6 1.2E‐4 10 rs1993802 3 110 595 402 203 G/A 0.17 SBP −3.9 ±0.9 1.1E‐5* rs7637068 ( r 2 =0.94), rs1462795 ( r 2 =0.94), rs4450855 ( r 2 =0.94)  DBP −2.6 ±0.6 1.2E‐5 rs1477841 ( r 2 =0.94) 11 rs12602832 17 42 396 896 202 A/G 0.14 SBP −2.8 ±0.9 1.6E‐3 DBP −2.7 ±0.6 1.2E‐5* 12 rs2038912 10 20 207 349 203 A/G 0.49 SBP 2.0 ±0.6 1.7E‐3 DBP 1.8 ±0.4 1.4E‐5* 13 rs4759885 12 131 736 813 203 G/A 0.46 SBP −2.7 ±0.7 7.3E‐5 rs4387437 ( r 2 =0.99), rs7488647 ( r 2 =0.99), rs12578896 ( r 2 =0.50) DBP −2.0 ±0.5 1.5E‐5* 14 rs771574 3 101 620 682 203 G/A 0.24 SBP −3.2 ±0.8 3.9E‐5 DBP −2.3 ±0.5 1.6E‐5* 15 rs10754459 1 245 785 508 203 G/A 0.30 SBP −2.3 ±0.7 1.3E‐3 DBP −2.1 ±0.5 1.6E‐5* 16 rs1392874 4 101 466 820 203 A/C 0.45 SBP −1.8 ±0.6 4.3E‐3 rs11725047 ( r 2 =0.09), rs4699824 ( r 2 =0.17) DBP −1.9 ±0.4 1.7E‐5* 17 rs1357365 17 34 436 532 203 A/G 0.22 SBP 2.6 ±0.7 5.2E‐4 DBP 2.2 ±0.5 2.0E‐5* 18 rs3814995 19 36 342 212 202 A/G 0.35 SBP −2.8 ±0.7 2.0E‐5* DBP −1.6 ±0.5 5.1E‐4 19 rs11841583 13 31 495 179 203 A/G 0.10 SBP −4.5 ±1.0 2.6E‐5 DBP −3.1 ±0.7 2.1E‐5* 20 rs17271855 19 5 524 721 203 A/G 0.18 SBP −2.9 ±0.8 5.0E‐4 DBP −2.4 ±0.6 2.2E‐5* Twenty loci with the lowest  P  values based on either systolic or diastolic response are listed. BP indicates blood pressure; CA, coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NCA, noncoded allele; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SE, standard error of β; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism. *Lowest  P  value of each locus.   Table 4. Single‐Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Amlodipine in the GENRES Study P  Value Rank SNP Chr Position (Build 37) N CA/NCA CAF SBP/DBP BP Response Other SNPs From the Same Locus with Low  P  Values ( r 2  Value With the Listed SNP) β SE P  Value 1 rs7687961 4 187 122 009 205 C/A 0.21 SBP 3.6 ±0.7 1.6E‐6* rs3736456 ( r 2 =0.36) DBP 1.6 ±0.4 1.5E‐4 2 rs602618 10 112 843 085 205 C/A 0.24 SBP 3.6 ±0.7 1.8E‐6* rs4917589 ( r 2 =0.36), rs10787287 ( r 2 =0.55), rs10787292  DBP 1.4 ±0.4 1.5E‐3 ( r 2 =0.66), rs521674 ( r 2 =0.92), rs7923122 ( r 2 =0.25) 3 rs17406681 2 212 403 387 205 A/G 0.20 SBP 3.4 ±0.7 2.2E‐6* DBP 1.5 ±0.4 2.4E‐4 4 rs12921986 16 72 312 727 205 G/A 0.03 SBP 7.4 ±1.6 6.8E‐6* rs12933482 ( r 2 =0.64), rs17604662 ( r 2 =0.64)  DBP 3.9 ±0.9 3.0E‐5 rs17606532 ( r 2 =0.78), rs34522712 ( r 2 =0.78) 5 rs354706 2 143 886 216 205 G/A 0.40 SBP 2.7 ±0.6 7.3E‐6* DBP 1.2 ±0.3 3.9E‐4 6 rs9814527 3 193 533 703 205 G/A 0.36 SBP 2.6 ±0.6 7.4E‐6* DBP 0.9 ±0.3 7.4E‐3 7 rs10021692 4 188 080 985 205 G/A 0.17 SBP 3.5 ±0.8 7.6E‐6* rs882227 ( r 2 =0.97) DBP 1.6 ±0.4 3.4E‐4 8 rs352796 8 15 613 270 205 G/A 0.02 SBP −8.9 ±2.3 1.2E‐4 DBP −5.6 ±1.3 1.3E‐5* 9 rs11125895 2 62 069 358 205 G/A 0.19 SBP 2.5 ±0.8 1.7E‐3 DBP 1.9 ±0.4 1.3E‐5* 10 rs220457 17 30 102 635 205 G/A 0.25 SBP 2.9 ±0.6 1.4E‐5* DBP 1.4 ±0.4 1.8E‐4 11 rs1947234 12 39 450 491 205 A/C 0.23 SBP −3.0 ±0.7 1.4E‐5* DBP −1.3 ±0.4 1.1E‐3 12 rs6083017 20 23 119 766 205 A/G 0.51 SBP −1.7 ±0.6 4.6E‐3 DBP −1.4 ±0.3 1.5E‐5* 13 rs1504058 3 1 090 602 204 G/A 0.43 SBP 1.7 ±0.6 4.2E‐3 DBP 1.4 ±0.3 1.6E‐5* 14 rs526847 6 148 236 385 204 G/A 0.39 SBP −2.7 ±0.6 1.8E‐5* rs498291 ( r 2 =0.99) DBP −1.0 ±0.4 3.8E‐3 15 rs9577581 13 114 252 002 205 A/G 0.38 SBP 2.2 ±0.6 8.0E‐4 DBP 1.6 ±0.4 1.8E‐5* 16 rs17238902 10 67 649 378 205 A/G 0.13 SBP −3.2 ±0.9 3.0E‐4 DBP −2.1 ±0.5 1.9E‐5* 17 rs6706577 2 111 796 833 205 A/G 0.48 SBP 1.7 ±0.6 4.1E‐3 DBP 1.4 ±0.3 2.0E‐5* 18 rs2018975 10 317 501 205 A/G 0.40 SBP 2.5 ±0.6 4.7E‐5 rs2379078 ( r 2 =0.81) DBP 1.5 ±0.3 2.4E‐5* 19 rs10821312 9 96 944 581 205 G/A 0.20 SBP 2.2 ±0.7 2.4E‐3 rs7038156 ( r 2 =1.00) DBP 1.7 ±0.4 2.4E‐5* 20 rs9364385 6 168 415 372 205 A/G 0.50 SBP 2.4 ±0.6 2.4E‐5* rs1858675 ( r 2 =1.00), rs3807061 ( r 2 =0.96) DBP 0.9 ±0.3 4.2E‐3 Twenty loci with the lowest  P  values based on either systolic or diastolic response are listed. BP indicates blood pressure; CA, coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NCA, noncoded allele; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism. *Lowest  P  value of each locus.   Table 5. Single‐Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Hydrochlorothiazide in the GENRES Study P  Value Rank SNP Chr Position (Build 37) N CA/NCA CAF SBP/DBP BP Response Other SNPs From the Same Locus With Low  P  values ( r 2  value With the Listed SNP) β SE P  Value 1 rs4867623 5 170 071 480 206 A/G 0.20 SBP −2.2 ±0.8 5.6E‐3 rs9968589 ( r 2 =0.64), rs9968699 ( r 2 =0.78) DBP −2.6 ±0.5 3.7E‐7* rs4868010 ( r 2 =0.78), rs11747249 ( r 2 =0.78) 1 rs4868010 5 170 092 760 206 A/C 0.16 SBP −2.1 ±0.8 1.1E‐2 (listed because of replication analysis in PEAR and  DBP −2.4 ±0.5 1.7E‐5 GERA) 2 rs321320 6 45 702 779 205 G/A 0.14 SBP −3.3 ±0.8 3.7E‐5 rs321329 ( r 2 =0.24) DBP −2.5 ±0.5 2.3E‐6* 2 rs321329 6 45 722 988 206 A/G 0.41 SBP −2.2 ±0.6 1.2E‐4 (Listed because of replication analysis in PEAR and  DBP −1.7 ±0.4 1.1E‐5 GERA), rs3846898 ( r 2 =0.57) 3 rs11006074 10 59 941 452 206 G/A 0.13 SBP 3.3 ±0.9 1.5E‐4 DBP 2.7 ±0.6 3.2E‐6* 4 rs3117915 13 22 605 580 206 G/A 0.21 SBP −2.0 ±0.7 3.7E‐3 DBP −2.1 ±0.5 8.6E‐6* 5 rs7821547 8 13 541 779 206 A/G 0.22 SBP 2.6 ±0.7 1.9E‐4 rs4831455 ( r 2 =0.91) DBP 2.0 ±0.4 9.5E‐6* 6 rs3825926 15 101 445 441 206 A/G 0.03 SBP 7.3 ±1.6 1.0E‐5* rs4646660 ( r 2 =0.62), rs4646672 ( r 2 =0.87) DBP 3.8 ±1.1 6.6E‐4 rs4246323 ( r 2 =0.87), rs4246326 ( r 2 =0.87) rs3803430 ( r 2 =0.87), rs4646683 ( r 2 =0.82) rs3803426 ( r 2 =1.00), rs1802603 ( r 2 =0.66) 7 rs2056531 17 47 283 058 206 A/G 0.11 SBP 3.1 ±0.9 7.1E‐4 rs4438351 ( r 2 =0.77), rs8077444 ( r 2 =0.96), rs11868965  DBP 2.7 ±0.6 1.1E‐5* ( r 2 =0.96), rs2293215 ( r 2 =1.00) 8 rs6977301 7 42 497 247 206 A/G 0.08 SBP 4.4 ±1.0 1.4E‐5* DBP 2.9 ±0.7 1.4E‐5 9 rs1553009 7 45 908 994 206 A/G 0.10 SBP 3.5 ±0.9 1.7E‐4 DBP 2.7 ±0.6 1.4E‐5* 10 rs2776906 6 37 431 757 206 A/G 0.36 SBP 2.6 ±0.6 1.7E‐5* rs10692 ( r 2 =1.00) DBP 1.3 ±0.4 9.6E‐4 11 rs964132 19 19 243 175 206 A/G 0.04 SBP 5.3 ±1.5 6.5E‐4 DBP 4.4 ±1.0 1.7E‐5* 12 rs158210 5 55 737 637 206 A/G 0.10 SBP −4.1 ±0.9 1.8E‐5* DBP −2.5 ±0.6 8.8E‐5 13 rs1324210 9 114 791 150 206 A/G 0.25 SBP 2.8 ±0.6 1.9E‐5* DBP 1.6 ±0.4 1.6E‐4 14 rs6546025 2 63 923 561 206 G/A 0.24 SBP −1.8 ±0.6 5.0E‐3 rs10201844 ( r 2 =0.90), rs10187013 ( r 2 =0.89)  DBP −1.8 ±0.4 2.0E‐5* rs6546038 ( r 2 =0.84) 15 rs11059985 12 129 347 891 206 A/G 0.29 SBP 2.8 ±0.6 2.1E‐5* DBP 1.0 ±0.4 2.6E‐2 16 rs3799369 6 25 912 634 206 G/A 0.12 SBP 3.7 ±0.8 2.1E‐5* DBP 1.7 ±0.6 4.0E‐3 17 rs17099050 14 100 255 923 206 C/A 0.03 SBP 7.2 ±1.7 5.4E‐5 DBP 5.0 ±1.2 2.3E‐5* 18 rs329668 11 133 795 219 205 A/G 0.13 SBP 3.5 ±0.8 2.6E‐5* DBP 2.0 ±0.6 5.8E‐4 19 rs776472 7 114 352 862 206 G/A 0.43 SBP −2.3 ±0.5 2.8E‐5* DBP −1.5 ±0.4 7.4E‐5 20 rs1922117 12 63 789 836 206 C/A 0.37 SBP −2.1 ±0.6 6.4E‐4 DBP −1.7 ±0.4 3.1E‐5* Twenty loci with the lowest  P  values based on either systolic or diastolic response are listed. BP indicates blood pressure; CA, coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NCA, noncoded allele; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism. *Lowest  P  value of each locus.   Figure 1.Manhattan plots from the genome‐wide association analysis of the ambulatory blood pressure responses using an additive model. (A) Losartan, systolic; (B) losartan, diastolic; (C) bisoprolol, systolic; (D) bisoprolol, diastolic; (E) amlodipine, systolic; (F) amlodipine, diastolic; (G) hydrochlorothiazide, systolic; (H) hydrochlorothiazide, diastolic.  The quantile‐quantile plots (Figure 2) show little evidence for genomic inflation and provide some support for the existence of significant associations with genomic loci influencing responsiveness to losartan and bisoprolol.  Figure 2.Quantile‐quantile plots from the genome‐wide association analysis of the ambulatory blood pressure responses using an additive model. Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms with minor allele frequency <0.01 are excluded. (A) Losartan, systolic; (B) losartan, diastolic; (C) bisoprolol, systolic; (D) bisoprolol, diastolic; (E) amlodipine, systolic; (F) amlodipine, diastolic; (G) hydrochlorothiazide, systolic; (H) hydrochlorothiazide, diastolic.  The strongest associations for the 24‐hour ABP responses to the 4 different drug responses are listed in Tables 2 through 5. In each case, 20 loci with the lowest P values for either ASBP or ADBP responses are indicated. For each locus listed, there was a remarkable congruence between the direction and relative extent of the systolic and diastolic BP lowering. None of the top 20 loci were shared between 2 or more drugs.

BODY.RESULTS.SECOND STEP: REPLICATION ANALYSES USING INDIVIDUAL PHARMACOGENOMICS STUDIES:
We carried out replication analyses of the top 20 significant associations with each antihypertensive response noted in the GENRES study, using data from 4 available studies: SOPHIA (losartan responses compared to those in GENRES), GERA II (candesartan responses, compared to losartan responses in GENRES), PEAR (atenolol responses, compared to bisoprolol responses in GENRES), and GERA I+PEAR (hydrochlorothiazide responses in all 3 studies). The participants of the replication studies are described in Table 6. Note that while the data from the GENRES and PEAR studies were based on ABP recordings, OBP measurements were used in SOPHIA, GERA I, and II. Composite results from these replication analyses are listed in Tables 7 through 9. Two SNPs analyzed in GENRES were not available in the replication material GERA II (losartan/candesartan responses, Table 7) and 3 SNPs were not available in GERA I (hydrochlorothiazide responses, Table 9). Two flanking SNPs were included in the replication analysis of the GERA I data (Table 9). Unfortunately, data on responses to amlodipine could not be replicated in this collaborative study.   Table 6. Description of Subjects in Replication Studies PEAR PEAR GERA I GERA II SOPHIA Treatment Atenolol HCTZ HCTZ Candesartan Losartan Blood pressure measurement method Ambulatory Ambulatory Office Office Office Number of subjects in replication analyses 193 193 196 198 372 Women, N (%) 85 (44%) 80 (42%) 84 (43%) 98 (49%) 92 (25%) Age, y 50.0±9.4 50.6±9.1 48.6±7.3 49.1±6.8 45.7±7.4 Body mass index, kg/m 2 30.1±5.4 30.2±4.9 31.3±5.6 29.9±3.9 26.9±2.9 Baseline systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 138±10 139±11 143±13 147±13 149±7 Baseline diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 87±8 87±9 96±6 95±5 97±4 Blood pressure responses Atenolol, systolic response, mm Hg −14.2 ±10.6 Atenolol, diastolic response, mm Hg −10.6±7.9 HCTZ, systolic response, mm Hg −8.4±10.1 −10.9±13.0 HCTZ, diastolic response, mm Hg −4.5±7.2 −6.3±8.8 Candesartan, systolic response, mm Hg −18.4±14.7 Candesartan, diastolic response, mm Hg −13.4±10.2 Losartan, systolic response, mm Hg −11.8±9.1 Losartan, systolic response, mm Hg −8.8±6.2 Only participants of European ancestry are included. Data are presented as mean±SD. HCTZ, hydrochlorothiazide.   Table 7. Replication Analysis of the Best GENRES Losartan 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response SNPs With Office Blood Pressure Responses to Candesartan in GERA II and to Losartan in SOPHIA Rank in GENRES SNP Chr Position (Build 37) Replication Results From GERA II (N=198) Replication Results From SOPHIA (N=372) CA/NCA CAF r 2  imp. SBP/DBP β P  Value Direction of Replication CA/NCA CAF r 2  imp. SBP/DBP β P  Value Direction of Replication 1 rs1370555 15 97 049 985 C/T 0.51 1.00 SBP −0.3 0.84 Same T/C 0.42 — SBP 0.2 0.76 Same DBP 0.2 0.82 Opposite DBP 0.2 0.60 Same 2 rs7086428 10 130 778 452 A/G 0.35 — SBP −1.6 0.22 Opposite A/G 0.36 — SBP 0.7 0.26 Same DBP −0.6 0.55 Opposite DBP 0.1 0.74 Same 3 rs4953045 2 44 268 800 C/T 0.24 0.90 SBP −1.9 0.25 Same C/T 0.28 — SBP −1.3 0.06 Same DBP −2.1 0.10 Same DBP 0.2 0.77 Opposite 4 rs711513 7 109 368 769 A/G 0.70 0.98 SBP −0.2 0.91 Opposite G/A 0.39 — SBP −0.7 0.29 Same DBP −0.7 0.51 Opposite DBP −0.3 0.49 Same 5 rs12814605 12 63 438 145 C/T 0.87 0.99 SBP −0.8 0.69 Opposite T/C 0.13 — SBP −1.0 0.29 Same DBP 0.7 0.62 Same DBP −1.0 0.14 Same 6 rs2279989 9 1 041 524 A/G 0.06 0.98 SBP 3.0 0.32 Opposite A/G 0.06 — SBP 1.3 0.34 Opposite DBP 1.6 0.47 Opposite DBP 0.1 0.93 Opposite 7 rs7597606 2 41 836 313 C/T 0.58 0.96 SBP −0.6 0.65 Same T/C 0.42 — SBP 0.1 0.86 Same DBP −0.8 0.43 Same DBP 0.2 0.72 Same 8 rs1559557 2 57 332 673 C/T 0.38 0.99 SBP 0.1 0.92 Same C/T 0.37 — SBP −0.6 0.34 Opposite DBP −0.3 0.77 Opposite DBP −0.7 0.15 Opposite 9 rs1432232 2 137 799 664 G/T 0.71 — SBP 2.8 0.06 Opposite T/G 0.26 — SBP −0.3 0.64 Opposite DBP 1.8 0.11 Opposite DBP −0.6 0.27 Opposite 10 rs1993802 3 110 595 402 C/T 0.08 — SBP 1.4 0.60 Opposite C/T 0.10 — SBP 0.3 0.75 Opposite DBP 1.4 0.48 Opposite DBP −0.5 0.46 Same 11 rs12602832 17 42 396 896 NA T/C 0.06 — SBP −0.6 0.67 Same DBP −0.5 0.57 Same 12 rs2038912 10 20 207 349 C/T 0.42 1.00 SBP 1.5 0.26 Opposite C/T 0.42 — SBP −0.8 0.22 Same DBP 0.8 0.41 Opposite DBP −0.4 0.45 Same 13 rs4759885 12 131 736 813 C/T 0.58 0.99 SBP 1.6 0.20 Opposite T/C 0.34 — SBP −0.4 0.48 Opposite DBP 1.0 0.31 Opposite DBP −0.6 0.21 Opposite 14 rs771574 3 101 620 682 A/G 0.63 1.00 SBP −0.3 0.84 Opposite G/A 0.27 — SBP 0.5 0.51 Opposite DBP −0.0 0.99 Opposite DBP 0.4 0.40 Opposite 15 rs10754459 1 245 785 508 NA C/T 0.22 — SBP 1.2 0.14 Opposite DBP 0.9 0.12 Opposite 16 rs1392874 4 101 466 820 A/C 0.43 0.99 SBP −1.1 0.43 Same A/C 0.39 — SBP 0.6 0.38 Opposite DBP −0.4 0.71 Same DBP 0.0 0.97 Opposite 17 rs1357365 17 34 436 532 A/G 0.30 1.00 SBP −0.3 0.84 Opposite A/G 0.35 — SBP 0.2 0.81 Same DBP 0.1 0.95 Same DBP 0.4 0.44 Same 18 rs3814995 19 36 342 212 C/T 0.68 0.19 SBP 7.1 0.03 Same T/C 0.28 — SBP −0.9 0.19 Same DBP 5.9 0.02 Same DBP −1.1 0.03 Same 19 rs11841583 13 31 495 179 A/G 0.13 0.83 SBP 0.6 0.78 Opposite A/G 0.05 — SBP 2.6 0.07 Opposite DBP 0.7 0.67 Opposite DBP 0.8 0.43 Opposite 20 rs17271855 19 5 524 721 C/T 0.83 0.88 SBP −2.2 0.23 Opposite T/C 0.20 — SBP −0.0 0.99 Same DBP −0.5 0.72 Opposite DBP −0.1 0.81 Same The loci are listed in the order of their rank in GENRES. CA indicates coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NA, not analyzed; NCA, noncoded allele;  r 2  imp,  r 2  values for imputed SNPs; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.   Table 8. Replication Analysis of the Best GENRES Bisoprolol 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response SNPs With Ambulatory 24‐H Blood Pressure Responses to Atenolol in PEAR Rank in GENRES SNP Chr Position (Build 37) Replication Results From PEAR (N=192 to 193) CA/NCA CAF SBP/DBP β P  Value Direction of Replication 1 rs2514036 11 67 415 054 C/T 0.18 SBP 0.7 0.58 Opposite DBP 0.5 0.56 Opposite 2 rs7268800 20 38 580 738 G/A 0.37 SBP −0.5 0.61 Same DBP −0.9 0.14 Same 3 rs12967284 18 12 532 098 T/C 0.34 SBP 0.1 0.90 Same DBP 0.2 0.75 Same 4 rs4357510 1 192 612 394 A/C 0.06 SBP 1.5 0.37 Opposite DBP 1.0 0.35 Opposite 5 rs2506143 10 33 468 169 G/A 0.17 SBP 1.3 0.28 Same DBP 0.9 0.26 Same 6 rs2029870 6 164 888 366 A/G 0.21 SBP −0.6 0.61 Same DBP 0.2 0.84 Opposite 7 rs7984003 13 82 866 573 T/C 0.18 SBP 2.1 0.07 Same DBP 0.5 0.52 Same 8 rs11777699 8 6 714 699 G/A 0.45 SBP −0.0 0.99 Same DBP 0.2 0.75 Opposite 9 rs10519585 5 118 676 529 C/T 0.35 SBP −0.2 0.79 Same DBP 0.3 0.63 Opposite 10 rs6501061 16 8 092 171 C/T 0.04 SBP 1.4 0.55 Same DBP 0.7 0.65 Same 11 rs16918900 8 54 147 242 T/C 0.04 SBP 0.1 0.97 Opposite DBP 0.6 0.67 Opposite 12 rs2194860 4 109 948 511 A/G 0.16 SBP 0.2 0.87 Same DBP −0.3 0.72 Opposite 13 rs2765115 13 24 529 399 G/A 0.13 SBP −2.2 0.14 Same DBP −0.4 0.71 Same 14 rs17642669 5 140 628 277 G/A 0.05 SBP −1.5 0.48 Same DBP 0.4 0.80 Opposite 15 rs7895038 10 2 432 266 T/C 0.47 SBP 0.0 0.98 Opposite DBP 0.3 0.60 Same 16 rs150210 21 19 362 312 C/T 0.25 SBP 1.1 0.30 Opposite DBP 0.6 0.43 Opposite 17 rs10910862 1 181 045 421 T/C 0.06 SBP 0.2 0.93 Opposite DBP −0.1 0.96 Same 18 rs2148117 10 27 213 946 C/T 0.05 SBP −0.6 0.80 Same DBP 0.2 0.88 Opposite 19 rs1150433 3 163 653 210 T/C 0.21 SBP 0.4 0.71 Opposite DBP 0.0 0.98 Same 20 rs969981 17 63 818 989 T/C 0.23 SBP 0.2 0.85 Opposite DBP 0.1 0.86 Opposite The loci are listed in the order of their rank in GENRES. All SNPs in this table were genotyped. CA indicates coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NCA, non‐coded allele; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.   Table 9. Replication Analysis of the Best GENRES Hydrochlorothiazide 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response SNPs With Office Blood Pressure Responses to Hydrochlorothiazide in GERA I and With 24‐H Ambulatory Blood Pressure Responses in PEAR Rank in GENRES SNP Chr Position (Build 37) Replication Results From GERA I (N=196) Replication Results From PEAR (N=190 to 193) CA/NCA CAF r 2  imp. SBP/DBP β P  Value Direction of Replication CA/NCA CAF r 2  imp. SBP/DBP β P  Value Direction of Replication 1 rs4867623 5 170 071 480 NA T/C 0.14 — SBP −0.8 0.49 Same DBP −0.4 0.68 Same 1 rs4868010 5 170 092 760 T/G 0.13 0.95 SBP −1.8 0.28 Same T/G 0.11 — SBP −1.6 0.23 Same DBP −0.5 0.67 Same DBP −1.1 0.29 Same 2 rs321320 6 45 702 779 C/T 0.22 0.82 SBP 1.1 0.49 Opposite C/T 0.22 — SBP 0.4 0.71 Opposite DBP −0.8 0.48 Same DBP −0.5 0.52 Same 2 rs321329 6 45 722 988 T/C 0.46 0.72 SBP −2.0 0.16 Same T/C 0.44 — SBP −0.7 0.47 Same DBP −2.3 0.03 Same DBP −0.4 0.54 Same 3 rs11006074 10 59 941 452 G/A 0.13 0.94 SBP 4.3 0.01 Same G/A 0.17 — SBP −1.6 0.16 Opposite DBP 1.9 0.14 Same DBP −0.8 0.37 Opposite 4 rs3117915 13 22 605 580 G/A 0.23 0.66 SBP −0.4 0.80 Same G/A 0.29 — SBP −0.3 0.73 Same DBP 0.4 0.74 Opposite DBP 0.1 0.86 Opposite 5 rs7821547 8 13 541 779 T/C 0.18 0.94 SBP −1.7 0.30 Opposite T/C 0.26 — SBP −0.9 0.41 Opposite DBP −0.9 0.47 Opposite DBP −0.1 0.94 Opposite 6 rs3825926 15 101 445 441 NA A/G 0.01 — SBP 3.6 0.36 Same DBP 5.1 0.08 Same 7 rs2056531 17 47 283 058 T/C 0.16 — SBP −0.7 0.69 Opposite T/C 0.20 — SBP 1.8 0.09 Same DBP −1.1 0.42 Opposite DBP 1.6 0.05 Same 8 rs6977301 7 42 497 247 A/G 0.07 0.88 SBP −1.2 0.65 Opposite A/G 0.07 — SBP −1.2 0.51 Opposite DBP −1.3 0.48 Opposite DBP −0.5 0.68 Opposite 9 rs1553009 7 45 908 994 A/G 0.21 1.00 SBP −0.9 0.54 Opposite A/G 0.22 — SBP 0.0 0.97 Opposite DBP −2.1 0.05 Opposite DBP −0.5 0.55 Opposite 10 rs2776906 6 37 431 757 T/C 0.26 0.99 SBP 0.1 0.94 Same T/C 0.33 — SBP 0.6 0.52 Same DBP −1.1 0.26 Opposite DBP 0.7 0.32 Same 11 rs964132 19 19 243 175 T/C 0.03 0.55 SBP −5.6 0.28 Opposite T/C 0.02 — SBP 1.7 0.62 Same DBP −1.8 0.63 Opposite DBP 1.1 0.66 Same 12 rs158210 5 55 737 637 T/C 0.11 0.80 SBP 0.5 0.83 Opposite A/G 0.10 — SBP 3.5 0.02 Opposite DBP 0.4 0.79 Opposite DBP 3.0 0.01 Opposite 13 rs1324210 9 114 791 150 A/G 0.16 0.63 SBP −3.2 0.13 Opposite A/G 0.18 — SBP −1.8 0.10 Opposite DBP −2.2 0.16 Opposite DBP −1.2 0.16 Opposite 14 rs6546025 2 63 923 561 G/A 0.22 0.97 SBP 0.3 0.84 Opposite G/A 0.22 — SBP 1.9 0.06 Opposite DBP −0.1 0.94 Same DBP 1.7 0.03 Opposite 15 rs11059985 12 129 347 891 A/G 0.25 0.46 SBP −0.6 0.77 Opposite A/G 0.26 — SBP 0.8 0.40 Same DBP −0.1 0.94 Opposite DBP 0.7 0.36 Same 16 rs3799369 6 25 912 634 C/T 0.11 0.95 SBP 0.9 0.65 Same G/A 0.10 — SBP 1.0 0.51 Same DBP −0.0 1.00 Opposite DBP 0.9 0.41 Same 17 rs17099050 14 100 255 923 G/T 0.04 0.87 SBP −2.6 0.41 Opposite G/T 0.04 — SBP 1.5 0.48 Same DBP −2.8 0.23 Opposite DBP 1.6 0.29 Same 18 rs329668 11 133 795 219 NA T/C 0.13 — SBP 0.1 0.94 Same DBP 0.0 1.00 Same 19 rs776472 7 114 352 862 C/T 0.44 0.92 SBP −0.6 0.61 Same G/A 0.42 — SBP 1.1 0.21 Opposite DBP −1.7 0.05 Same DBP 1.1 0.10 Opposite 20 rs1922117 12 63 789 836 G/T 0.29 0.99 SBP 0.0 0.98 Opposite G/T 0.34 — SBP 1.0 0.29 Opposite DBP 0.5 0.62 Opposite DBP 0.5 0.49 Opposite The loci are listed in the order of their rank in GENRES. CA indicates coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; NA, not analyzed; NCA, non‐coded allele;  r 2  imp,  r 2  values for imputed SNPs; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.   Of the 60 SNPs with the strongest associations to losartan, bisoprolol, or hydrochlorothiazide responses in GENRES (Tables 2, 3 and 5), no SNP reached the Bonferroni‐corrected level of significance (2.5×10−4). Only 1 SNP (rs3814995 on chromosome 19) emerged that gave a 2‐sided P value <0.05 (suggestive significance level), with the same direction of BP effect, for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses to a particular drug in 2 other studies (Table 7). Accordingly, rs3814995 was associated with systolic (P=2.0×10−5) and diastolic (P=5.1×10−4) BP responses to losartan in GENRES, with systolic (P=0.03) and diastolic (P=0.02) BP responses in GERA II, and diastolic BP responses (P=0.03) in SOPHIA (Table 7); there was a trend toward association for systolic BP response in SOPHIA (P=0.19). The SNP rs3814995 corresponds to a Glu117Lys missense mutation in the NPHS1 gene coding for the protein nephrin.

BODY.RESULTS.THIRD STEP: META‐ANALYSES BASED ON GENRES, PEAR, GERA I, GERA II, AND SOPHIA DATA:
A meta‐analysis employing inverse‐variance model with fixed effects was carried out using SNP data from GENRES, GERA I, GERA II, PEAR, and SOPHIA studies (Table 10). P values <1×10−5 were considered to indicate a suggestive association; no SNP reached the genome‐wide level of significance (5×10−8).   Table 10. Meta‐Analysis of Blood Pressure Responses to Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists, β‐Receptor Blockers, and Hydrochlorothiazide SNP Chr Position Nearest Gene CA/NCA Meta‐Analysis Discovery Study Replication Study N CAF Β P  Value β P  Value β P  Value β P  Value Angiotensin receptor antagonists GENRES GERA II SOPHIA SBP response rs4953045 2 44268800 
 LRPPRC 
 G/A 775 0.26 −2.4 5.1E‐07 −3.5 1.1E‐06 −1.9 0.25 −1.3 0.06 DBP response rs12814605 12 63438145 
 AVPR1A 
 A/G 775 0.14 −1.9 6.4E‐06 −3.0 2.3E‐06 −0.7 0.62 −1.0 0.14 β‐Receptor blockers GENRES PEAR SBP response rs7984003 13 82866573 Intergenic A/G 438 0.23 2.9 7.8E‐07 3.1 5.4E‐06 2.1 0.07 rs2765115 13 24529399 
 SPATA13 
 G/A 440 0.15 −3.3 3.6E‐06 −3.7 1.2E‐05 −2.2 0.14 DBP response rs7268800 20 38580738 lincRNA G/A 440 0.40 −1.6 8.6E‐07 −1.9 2.1E‐06 −0.9 0.14 Hydrochlorothiazide GENRES GERA I PEAR SBP response rs3825926 15 101445441 
 ALDH1A3 
 A/G 399 0.03 6.7 5.6E‐06 7.3 1.0E‐05 NA NA 3.6 0.36 DBP response rs4867623 5 170071480 
 KCNIP1 
 A/G 398 0.18 −2.1 1.5E‐06 −2.6 3.7E‐07 NA NA −0.4 0.68 rs321329 6 45722988 
 CLIC5, RUNX2 
 A/G 595 0.42 −1.5 2.3E‐06 −1.7 1.1E‐05 −2.3 0.03 −0.4 0.54 rs321320 6 45702779 
 CLIC5, RUNX2 
 G/A 594 0.17 −1.9 8.5E‐06 −2.5 2.3E‐06 −0.8 0.48 −0.5 0.52 The top 20 GENRES single‐nucleotide polymorphisms of each drug were analyzed using GENRES, GERA1, GERA II, PEAR, and SOPHIA data. Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms with significance level <1×10 −5  are shown. Physical positions are given in build 37 coordinates and β values in mm Hg. CA indicates coded allele; CAF, coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; lincRNA, long intergenic noncoding RNA; N, total number of subjects in meta‐analysis; NA, data not available; NCA, noncoded allele; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.   Of the top 20 SNPs associated with losartan responses in the GENRES Study, rs4953045 on chromosome 2 was associated with BP response (P=5.1×10−7) and rs12814605 on chromosome 12 with diastolic BP response (P=6.4×10−6) in the meta‐analysis utilizing responses to losartan in SOPHIA and candesartan in GERA II (Tables 10 and 11). The closest gene to the intergenic SNP rs4953045 is LRPPRC, which is located 46 kbp apart from it and codes for mitochondrial leucine‐rich PPR motif‐containing protein. rs12814605 is likewise an intergenic variant, located approximately 100 kb apart from the closest protein‐coding genes AVPR1A (arginine vasopressin receptor 1A) and PPM1H (Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent protein phosphatase 1H). However, the slightly higher P value for this SNP in the meta‐analysis than in the discovery study (Table 10) renders the significance of this finding uncertain.  Table 11. Meta‐Analysis of Blood Pressure Responses to Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists SNP Chr CA NCA N CAF β SE P  Value Direction of β (GENRES/GERA II/SOPHIA) Systolic blood pressure response rs4953045 2 G A 775 0.26 −2.4 0.5 5.1E‐07 − − − rs3814995 19 A G 774 0.32 −2.0 0.5 1.5E‐05 − − − rs7086428 10 A G 775 0.37 1.6 0.4 2.1E‐04 + − + rs7597606 2 A G 774 0.41 1.5 0.4 3.2E‐04 + + + rs12814605 12 A G 775 0.14 −2.2 0.6 3.5E‐04 − + − rs1370555 15 G A 775 0.49 −1.3 0.4 2.1E‐03 − − − rs1993802 3 G A 775 0.14 −1.9 0.6 2.7E‐03 − + + rs711513 7 G A 772 0.37 −1.3 0.4 3.1E‐03 − + − rs12602832 17 A G 574 0.11 −2.1 0.7 4.0E‐03 − ? − rs2038912 10 A G 775 0.54 1.1 0.4 9.0E‐03 + − + rs1357365 17 A G 775 0.29 1.1 0.5 1.7E‐02 + − + rs1559557 2 G A 775 0.35 1.1 0.5 1.8E‐02 + + − rs771574 3 G A 775 0.27 −1.1 0.5 2.9E‐02 − + + rs11841583 13 A G 775 0.09 −1.7 0.8 2.9E‐02 − + + rs2279989 9 A G 775 0.08 −1.6 0.8 3.7E‐02 − + + rs17271855 19 A G 775 0.19 −1.1 0.5 4.8E‐02 − + − rs1432232 2 A C 775 0.23 1.0 0.5 5.0E‐02 + − rs4759885 12 G A 775 0.57 −0.7 0.4 9.2E‐02 − + + rs1392874 4 A C 775 0.42 −0.7 0.4 9.8E‐02 − + rs10754459 1 G A 575 0.26 −0.7 0.5 1.6E‐01 − ? + Diastolic blood pressure response rs12814605 12 A G 775 0.14 −1.9 0.4 6.4E‐06 − − − rs3814995 19 A G 774 0.32 −1.4 0.3 1.1E‐05 − − − rs12602832 17 A G 574 0.11 −2.1 0.5 4.2E‐05 − ? − rs1370555 15 G A 775 0.49 −1.1 0.3 1.0E‐04 − + − rs1993802 3 G A 775 0.14 −1.7 0.4 2.1E‐04 − + − rs711513 7 G A 772 0.37 −1.1 0.3 2.6E‐04 − + − rs2279989 9 A G 775 0.08 −1.9 0.5 4.0E‐04 − + + rs1357365 17 A G 775 0.29 1.2 0.3 4.5E‐04 + + + rs4953045 2 G A 775 0.26 −1.2 0.3 6.0E‐04 − + rs2038912 10 A G 775 0.54 1.0 0.3 6.2E‐04 + − + rs1392874 4 A C 775 0.42 −1.0 0.3 1.2E‐03 − + rs17271855 19 A G 775 0.19 −1.2 0.4 2.3E‐03 − + − rs7597606 2 A G 774 0.41 0.9 0.3 4.0E‐03 + + + rs11841583 13 A G 775 0.09 −1.6 0.6 4.5E‐03 − + + rs7086428 10 A G 775 0.37 0.8 0.3 1.3E‐02 + − + rs771574 3 G A 775 0.27 −0.8 0.4 1.7E‐02 − + + rs10754459 1 G A 575 0.26 −0.9 0.4 1.7E‐02 − ? + rs4759885 12 G A 775 0.57 −0.6 0.3 7.0E‐02 − + + rs1559557 2 G A 775 0.35 0.5 0.3 1.6E‐01 + − rs1432232 2 A C 775 0.23 0.5 0.4 2.1E‐01 + − The best GENRES losartan 24‐h ambulatory blood pressure response SNPs were analyzed using GENRES, GERA II, and SOPHIA data. ? indicates data not available; CA, coded allele; CAF, weighed coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; N, total number of subjects in meta‐analysis; NCA, noncoded allele; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.   Next, a meta‐analysis of the 20 SNPs with the highest association scores with bisoprolol responses in GENRES was performed in conjunction with the PEAR Study, using 24‐hour ABP responses to atenolol for comparison (Tables 10 and 12). Two SNPs on chromosome 13, rs7984003 (P=7.8×10−7) and rs2765115 (P=3.6×10−6) showed suggestive evidence of association when systolic ABP responses of both studies were analyzed. Two pseudogenes (PTMAP and GYG1P2) but no obvious protein‐coding gene candidates are located in the vicinity of rs7984003. Of the protein‐coding genes, SPATA13 coding for spermatogenesis‐associated protein 13 lies closest (24 kbp) to rs2765115. A corresponding meta‐analysis of DBP responses to bisoprolol revealed an association to rs7268800 (P=8.6×10−7), which is an intergenic polymorphism, with 2 long intergenic non‐protein coding RNA species but no apparent candidate genes in its vicinity.  Table 12. Meta‐Analysis of Blood Pressure Responses to β‐Receptor Blockers SNP Chr CA NCA N CAF β SE P  Value Direction of β (GENRES/PEAR) Systolic blood pressure response rs7984003 13 A G 438 0.23 2.9 0.6 7.8E‐07 + + rs2765115 13 G A 440 0.15 −3.3 0.7 3.6E‐06 − − rs6501061 16 G A 440 0.08 4.1 0.9 1.2E‐05 + + rs2514036 11 G A 440 0.14 −3.1 0.7 2.1E‐05 − + rs2194860 4 A G 440 0.18 2.5 0.6 5.5E‐05 + + rs12967284 18 A G 440 0.28 2.0 0.5 1.1E‐04 + + rs2029870 6 A G 437 0.16 −2.5 0.7 2.0E‐04 − − rs7895038 10 G A 440 0.45 −1.8 0.5 2.6E‐04 − + rs10519585 5 G A 440 0.32 −1.8 0.5 3.7E‐04 − − rs969981 17 A G 439 0.18 −2.2 0.6 3.9E‐04 − + rs2506143 10 G A 440 0.12 2.6 0.8 5.5E‐04 + + rs2148117 10 G A 440 0.03 −5.1 1.5 8.3E‐04 − − rs10910862 1 A G 440 0.06 −3.5 1.1 1.1E‐03 − + rs150210 21 G A 440 0.27 −1.7 0.5 1.2E‐03 − + rs7268800 20 G A 440 0.40 −1.6 0.5 1.2E‐03 − − rs17642669 5 G A 440 0.06 −3.3 1.1 2.4E‐03 − − rs4357510 1 A C 440 0.06 −2.9 1.0 2.6E‐03 − + rs11777699 8 G A 439 0.49 −1.4 0.5 5.1E‐03 − − rs1150433 3 A G 440 0.16 −1.9 0.7 5.2E‐03 − + rs16918900 8 A G 440 0.03 −3.7 1.6 2.3E‐02 − + Diastolic blood pressure response rs7268800 20 G A 440 0.40 −1.6 0.3 8.6E‐07 − − rs2506143 10 G A 440 0.12 2.2 0.5 1.0E‐05 + + rs7984003 13 A G 438 0.23 1.7 0.4 1.4E‐05 + + rs12967284 18 A G 440 0.28 1.5 0.4 3.6E‐05 + + rs11777699 8 G A 439 0.49 −1.2 0.3 1.2E04 − + rs2029870 6 A G 437 0.16 −1.7 0.4 1.6E‐04 − + rs17642669 5 G A 440 0.06 −2.7 0.7 2.0E‐04 − + rs10910862 1 A G 440 0.06 −2.6 0.7 2.3E‐04 − − rs2765115 13 G A 440 0.15 −1.8 0.5 2.4E‐04 − − rs10519585 5 G A 440 0.32 −1.2 0.3 3.4E‐04 − + rs2514036 11 G A 440 0.14 −1.7 0.5 4.4E‐04 − + rs1150433 3 A G 440 0.16 −1.5 0.5 8.0E‐04 − − rs4357510 1 A C 440 0.06 −2.1 0.7 1.2E‐03 − + rs2194860 4 A G 440 0.18 1.4 0.4 1.4E‐03 + − rs6501061 16 G A 440 0.08 2.0 0.6 1.8E‐03 + + rs7895038 10 G A 440 0.45 −1.0 0.3 2.5E‐03 − − rs2148117 10 G A 440 0.03 −3.0 1.0 4.0E‐03 − + rs16918900 8 A G 440 0.03 −3.0 1.1 5.9E‐03 − + rs150210 21 G A 440 0.27 −0.9 0.4 1.1E‐02 − + rs969981 17 A G 439 0.18 −1.1 0.4 1.3E‐02 − + The best GENRES bisoprolol 24‐h ambulatory blood pressure response SNPs were analyzed using GENRES and PEAR data. CA indicates coded allele; CAF, weighed coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; N, total number of subjects in meta‐analysis; NCA, non‐coded allele; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.   Finally, we carried out a similar meta‐analysis with the hydrochlorothiazide response data, using 24‐hour ABP responses in PEAR and OBP responses in GERA I for comparison (Tables 10 and 13). rs3825926 on chromosome 15 was found to associate with systolic BP responses (P=5.6×10−6; GERA I data lacking). This SNP is located in the intron of the ALDH1A3 gene coding for aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A3, and is 14 kbp apart from the LRRK1 gene coding for leucine‐rich repeat kinase 1. A corresponding meta‐analysis of diastolic BP responses revealed 3 suggestive associations to 3 SNPs (Table 10). rs4867623 is an intronic variant of KCNIP1 coding for potassium (Kv) channel interacting protein 1; however, a higher P value was obtained in the meta‐analysis than in the discovery sample (Table 10). rs321329 and rs321320 are 2 adjacent intergenic variants on chromosome 6, lying ≈90 kbp of RUNX2 encoding the runt‐related transcription factor 2 and ≈145 kb from CLIC5 encoding the chloride intracellular channel 5.  Table 13. Meta‐Analysis of Blood Pressure Responses to Hydrochlorothiazide SNP Chr CA NCA N CAF β SE P  Value Direction of β (GENRES/GERA I/PEAR) Systolic blood pressure response rs3825926 15 A G 399 0.03 6.7 1.5 5.6E‐06 + ? + rs3799369 6 G A 595 0.11 2.7 0.7 6.6E‐05 + + + rs321329 6 A G 595 0.42 −1.8 0.5 7.3E‐05 − − − rs11059985 12 A G 594 0.28 2.0 0.5 1.0E‐04 + − + rs2776906 6 A G 595 0.34 1.8 0.5 1.1E‐04 + + + rs329668 11 A G 398 0.13 2.5 0.7 3.1E‐04 + ? + rs2056531 17 A G 595 0.15 2.2 0.6 8.3E‐04 + − + rs6977301 7 A G 595 0.08 2.7 0.8 1.1E‐03 + − rs4868010 5 A C 594 0.14 −2.0 0.7 2.4E‐03 − − − rs776472 7 G A 595 0.43 −1.3 0.4 2.6E‐03 − + rs17099050 14 C A 595 0.04 3.7 1.2 2.6E‐03 + − + rs964132 19 A G 595 0.04 4.0 1.3 3.0E‐03 + − + rs11006074 10 G A 595 0.14 1.9 0.6 3.2E‐03 + + − rs321320 6 G A 594 0.17 −1.7 0.6 5.6E‐03 − + + rs4867623 5 A G 398 0.18 −1.8 0.7 6.3E‐03 − ? − rs3117915 13 G A 595 0.23 −1.4 0.5 1.1E‐02 − − − rs1324210 9 A G 595 0.23 1.4 0.5 1.1E‐02 + − rs1553009 7 A G 595 0.16 1.5 0.6 1.7E‐02 + − rs158210 5 A G 595 0.10 −1.8 0.7 1.9E‐02 − + + rs7821547 8 A G 595 0.23 1.2 0.5 2.4E‐02 + − rs1922117 12 C A 592 0.35 −1.0 0.5 2.7E‐02 − + + rs6546025 2 G A 595 0.23 −0.6 0.5 2.1E‐01 − + + Diastolic blood pressure response rs4867623 5 A G 398 0.18 −2.1 0.4 1.5E‐06 − ? − rs321329 6 A G 595 0.42 −1.5 0.3 2.3E‐06 − − − rs321320 6 G A 594 0.17 −1.9 0.4 8.5E‐06 − − − rs4868010 5 A C 594 0.14 −1.9 0.4 2.0E‐05 − − − rs2056531 17 A G 595 0.15 1.9 0.5 2.2E‐05 + − + rs964132 19 A G 595 0.04 3.6 0.9 5.8E‐05 + − + rs3825926 15 A G 399 0.03 3.9 1.0 1.2E‐04 + ? + rs11006074 10 G A 595 0.14 1.7 0.4 1.6E‐04 + + − rs3117915 13 G A 595 0.23 −1.3 0.4 4.0E‐04 − + + rs7821547 8 A G 595 0.23 1.3 0.4 4.5E‐04 + − rs6977301 7 A G 595 0.08 1.9 0.6 6.2E‐04 + − rs17099050 14 C A 595 0.04 2.9 0.9 7.9E‐04 + − + rs776472 7 G A 595 0.43 −1.0 0.3 1.1E‐03 − + rs1922117 12 C A 592 0.35 −1.0 0.3 2.4E‐03 − + + rs329668 11 A G 398 0.13 1.4 0.5 2.8E‐03 + ? + rs2776906 6 A G 595 0.34 0.9 0.3 4.1E‐03 + − + rs3799369 6 G A 595 0.11 1.3 0.5 5.5E‐03 + − + rs6546025 2 G A 595 0.23 −0.9 0.3 7.4E‐03 − + rs1324210 9 A G 595 0.23 0.9 0.4 1.7E‐02 + − rs11059985 12 A G 594 0.28 0.8 0.4 2.1E‐02 + − + rs1553009 7 A G 595 0.16 0.9 0.4 3.3E‐02 + − rs158210 5 A G 595 0.10 −1.1 0.5 4.0E‐02 − + + The best GENRES hydrochlorothiazide 24‐h ambulatory blood pressure response SNPs were analyzed using GENRES, GERA I, and PEAR data. ? indicates data not available; CA, coded allele; CAF, weighed coded allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; N, total number of subjects in meta‐analysis; NCA, noncoded allele; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism. 

BODY.DISCUSSION:
The majority of the pharmacogenomic studies on essential hypertension carried out until now suffer from weaknesses in their design.7 The GENRES Study represents a careful attempt to avoid some of the most important problems. Accordingly, this study is prospective, placebo‐controlled, and rotational in nature, implying that every test subject received 4 different antihypertensive drugs as a 4 weeks′ monotherapy in a randomized order, with 4 intervening 4 weeks′ placebo periods. The use of the mean of 4 placebo periods increases the accuracy of the estimation of baseline BP levels. The performance of the GENRES study has been validated by a number of observations. For example, the within‐subject resemblance of BP responses, as analyzed by pairwise correlation matrixes, was found to be highest for responses to bisoprolol and losartan (r=0.32 to 0.39), followed by responses to amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide (r=0.20 to 0.35), as would be expected.13 In addition, plasma renin activity was positively correlated with BP responses to losartan (P values 0.001 to 0.005) and bisoprolol (P values 0.03 to 0.17), and negatively with BP responses to hydrochlorothiazide (P values 0.01 to 0.07).17  There are several important limitations in the present study. First, an obvious methodological limitation of the GENRES study is the sample size of 228 individuals, resulting in insufficient power to detect effect sizes of 0.5 to 1 mm Hg, characteristic of gene loci revealed in genome‐wide association studies of complex diseases. For example, we calculated that in order to reach a power of 80% to detect an antihypertensive response in GENRES, an effect size of 4 mm Hg is needed for a SNP with a minor allele frequency of 0.30. It should be noted, however, that in carefully controlled pharmacogenetic studies, common polymorphisms with small effects on BP levels may well have larger effects on BP responsiveness. Second, the GENRES study included only males with mild‐to‐moderate hypertension. Third, since equipotent drug effects were not designed to be reached, less variability in responses to certain drugs may have affected our data. Fourth, it is to be emphasized that while ABP measurements were used in GENRES and PEAR, OBP measurements were carried out in SOPHIA, GERA I, and GERA II, which may have affected the meta‐analysis data.  Even using the strictly controlled experimental conditions in GENRES, we failed to identify pharmacogenomic associations of genome‐wide significance (P<5×10−8), with the exception of 3 SNPs (rs2514036, rs948445, and rs2514037) reaching this value for bisoprolol responses. In fact, we consider this lack of stronger associations as the most significant finding of our study, because it emphasizes the importance of even larger samples of patients in studies with similar strict design. Furthermore, it is of note that upon listing of 80 different SNPs (20 for each drug, Tables 2 through 5) showing the strongest associations to drug responses, we failed to identify any SNP common to more than a single drug class, supporting the notion that the genomic pathways regulating the BP‐lowering mechanisms of different classes of antihypertensive drugs are specific to each class of drugs.  A meta‐analysis using losartan response data from the GENRES and SOPHIA studies and candesartan data from the GERA II study revealed 2 gene loci of potential interest. rs4953035 showing association with systolic BP responses is located ≈46 kbp from LRPPRC coding for mitochondrial leucine‐rich PPR motif‐containing protein that is expressed in a variety of tissues, including the heart and kidney. There were also other SNPs within or close to LRPPRC that showed a significant association (Table 3). Another gene of note, PPM1B coding for Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent protein phosphatase, lies 126 kb from rs4953035. This gene may be involved in the cell cycle and is richly expressed (eg, in the heart). Recent data indicate that the phosphatase coded by PPB1B selectively modulates PPAR activity.22  In addition, based on ranking of strengths of associations of the various drug responses in GENRES and available replication studies, we found that 1 particular SNP, rs3814995, was significantly associated with responses to angiotensin receptor antagonists in the same direction in 3 separate studies. It is of note that even meta‐analysis of the rs3814995 data indicated P values close to the 1.0×10−5 (Table 11). This missense variant (NM_004646.3:c.349G>A) maps within the coding region of the NPHS1 gene and causes an amino acid substitution of glutamic acid to lysine (p.Glu117Lys) in the nephrin protein. The amino acid is conserved and the change is predicted to be probably damaging by PolyPhen2 (score: 0.999). The variant is relatively common, with a higher minor allele frequency in populations of European origin (0.30) compared to African Americans (0.09) (Exome Variant Server, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/). Nephrin is the principal structural protein of the glomerular podocytes, and mutations of NPHS1 result in the congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type.23–25 Increased angiotensin II levels have been shown to result in decrease of renal nephrin expression in a hypertensive rat model.26 Interestingly, angiotensin blockers irbesartan27 and valsartan28 have been shown to attenuate the decrease of nephrin levels and to retard the development of albuminuria in diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats. The p.Glu117Lys variant does not seem to associate with diabetic proteinuria or end‐stage renal disease in type 1 diabetic patients, although carriers of the minor allele had a later onset of diabetes than those with the wild‐type allele.29 Collectively, the present and previous findings should justify additional studies using samples and data from large long‐term clinical trials in which nephrin Glu117Lys genotypes are related to blood pressure responses to angiotensin receptor antagonists and to cardiovascular events.  When bisoprolol data were analyzed in the GENRES material only, we obtained the highest P values with genome‐wide significance (2.0×10−8, 2.1×10−8, and 4.1×10−8) for the tightly linked nearby SNPs rs2514036, rs948445, and rs2514037 present on chromosome 11. rs2514036 is an upstream regulatory region variant of ACY3, encoding aminoacylase III, while rs2514037 is an intronic variant of ACY3. rs948445, a missense variant mapping within the coding region of the ACY3 gene, causes an amino acid substitution p.Arg8Gln, which is predicted by PolyPhen2 to be benign. There appears to be no data solidly linking ACY3 to regulation of blood pressure. It is known to be abundantly expressed in kidney proximal tubules, where it may have role in deacetylating mercapturic acids, and to lesser extent in other tissues including brain and heart.30 Although β‐adrenergic receptors may be more abundant in epithelial cells of distal than proximal parts of the nephron (for review, see Ref. 31), cultured proximal tubular cells obtained from animal models have been reported to contain β‐1‐ and β‐2‐adrenergic receptors.32–33 Other genes next to rs2514036 include ALDH3B2 (15 kbp apart) coding for aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family member B2 expressed mainly in salivary gland and placenta,34 and TBX10 (8 kbp apart) coding for a member of the T‐box family of transcription factors involved in organogenesis and embryonic development. However, rs2514036 data were not at all replicated in the PEAR study using atenolol as the β‐blocker (Table 8). In the meta‐analysis combining atenolol data of PEAR, 3 SNPs provided suggestive associations. rs7984003 and rs7268800 appear to be intergenic variants, with no obvious candidate genes for BP regulation in their vicinity, but rs7984003 maps within an ENCODE transcription factor binding site (ERα_a). rs2765115 is likewise an intergenic variant located 24 kbp from SPATA13 coding for spermatogenesis‐associated protein 13, also known as APC‐stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2 (ASEF2). ASEF2 appears to specifically activate Rho‐family GTPases and may thus influence a wide range of cellular functions, including smooth‐muscle contraction. It is also of interest that a genetic association study has suggested that SPATA13‐AS1 (gene coding for an antisense RNA that overlaps SPATA13) may serve as a pharmacogenomic predictor of effectiveness of inhaled β‐agonists.35  In the meta‐analysis of association with hydrochlorothiazide responsiveness, 3 different gene loci were identified that showed P values <1.0×10−5 when replication data from GERA I and/or PEAR studies were used (Table 10). rs3825926 is of interest because the genotype‐related β values for thiazide responses were the highest in both GENRES and PEAR (Tables 5 and 9); unfortunately, it could not be analyzed in GERA I. This SNP represents an intronic variant of ALDH1A3, coding for aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A3. This gene is expressed in a variety of tissues including retina and kidney, and mutations of ALDH1A3 are known to result in anophthalmia or microopthalmia.36 Another SNP, rs321329, deserves note since responses to hydrochlorothiazide followed a logical pattern (although P value remained nonsignificant in PEAR; Table 9) in all 3 studies. It should, however, be pointed out that the SNP rs321329 was not the top SNP of that locus in GENRES and the top SNP rs321320 showed no evidence of replication in GERA I or in PEAR (Table 9). The closest candidate genes, located 90 to 145 kbp from this SNP, include RUNX2, encoding a transcription factor involved in skeletal morphogenesis, and CLIC5, encoding the chloride intracellular channel protein 5. CLIC5 is expressed (except in placenta and cochlea) in renal glomerular podocytes and endothelial cells, and is postulated to function in the maintenance of glomerular and podocyte architecture.37 It is not known, however, whether the CLIC5 channel plays any role in thiazide action.  Certain general delineations of our findings should be recapitulated. First, none of the 80 SNPs (20 for each drug) listed in Tables 2 through 5 proved to give a hit when compared to the list of >40 hypertension candidate loci6 derived from genome‐wide association studies of essential hypertension. Second, the association of the NPHS1 (nephrin) gene Glu117Lys variant with losartan responsiveness is of interest in view of the experimental findings linking together angiotensin II levels, angiotensin II receptor blockers, nephrin expression, and development of albuminuria. Third, 2 different members of the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene family got some support as candidate genes, 1 for bisoprolol (ALDH3B2) and the other for hydrochlorothiazide (ALDH1A3) responsiveness. The human ALDH gene family contains 19 members.34 It is intriguing that 2 other members of this gene family (ALDH1A2 and ALDH7) were found to be associated with the presence of hypertension in African Americans,38 and yet another member (ALDH2) associated with BP variation in East Asians.39 ALDHs constitute an important family of enzymes that are able to oxidize a variety of endogenous and exogenous aldehydes that play a role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and responsiveness to environmental stress.34 The links, if any, of ALDHs to regulation of BP and/or antihypertensive drug action remain unknown at present.

BODY.DISCUSSION.PERSPECTIVES:
Genomic loci influencing responsiveness to antihypertensive drugs are proving difficult to identify, reflecting similar difficulties to identify genetic variants underlying elevated BP per se. We have carried out a genome‐wide analysis of responses of 4 different antihypertensive drugs using very carefully designed experimental conditions. Using GENRES data alone, we could only identify 1 candidate gene locus for hypertension pharmacogenomics: ACY3 associating with bisoprolol responsiveness. However, use of replication data from 3 other trials provided several additional gene candidates, including those coding for nephrin and members of the aldehyde dehydrogenase family, all of which require additional studies. We did not find evidence for gene loci associating with responsiveness to more than 1 particular class of antihypertensive drugs, suggesting that genetic control of pathways influencing antihypertensive drug responsiveness are drug class–specific. However, since many hypertension genes may show pleiotropic effects on blood pressure pathways, it is possible that the power of our study may simply have been insufficient to detect gene loci interacting with more than 1 class of drugs. In future, even larger carefully controlled prospective clinical studies are needed in which several different antihypertensive drugs are tested. It should be emphasized that although pharmacogenomic prediction of antihypertensive response augmentation on the order of 2 mm Hg may appear minor, in the long term it is translated into a 7% to 10% lower risk of mortality from ischemic heart disease and stroke.40 It is realistic to expect that this level of predictive accuracy in individualized antihypertensive drug therapy could be reached by pharmacogenomic approaches.

BODY.SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL:
Table S1. Ambulatory blood pressure response, comparison of two different baseline definitions: mean of all placebo
periods with preceding placebo period.Table S2. Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure levels on placebo according to immediately preceding study drug treatment period.Table S3. Covariates used for calculation of ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure response residuals in the GENRES Study.Click here for additional data file.

Question: Compared to losartan/ amlodipine/ hydrochlorothiazide what was the result of bisoprolol on drug‐treated diabetes?
Evidence: No patient had drug‐treated diabetes or reduced kidney glomerular filtration rate.
Answer: no significant difference