TITLE: Analysis of transit time flow of the right internal thoracic artery
anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery compared to the left internal
thoracic artery

  ABSTRACT.INTRODUCTION:
We evaluated with transit time flow the performance of the right and left thoracic
arteries when used as a graft for the left anterior descending artery.

ABSTRACT.METHODS:
Fifty patients undergoing surgery for myocardial revascularization without
cardiopulmonary bypass were divided into two groups. In group A patients received
graft of right internal mammary artery to the anterior interventricular branch. In
group B patients received graft of left internal mammary artery to the same
branch. At the end of the operation the flow was assessed by measuring transit
time.

ABSTRACT.RESULTS:
In group A, mean age was 60.6±9.49 years. The average height and weight of the
group was 80.4±10.32 kg and 169.2±6.86 cm. The average number of grafts per
patient in this group was 3.28±1.49. The mean flow and distal resistance obtained
in right internal thoracic artery was 42.1±23.4 ml/min and 2.8±0.9 respectively.
In group B, the mean age was 59.8±9.7 years. The average height and weight of this
group was 77.7±14.22 kg and 166.0±8.2 cm. The average number of grafts per patient
in this group was 3.08 ±0.82. The mean flow and distal resistance observed in this
group was 34.2±19.1 ml/min and 2.0±0.7. There were no deaths in this series.

ABSTRACT.CONCLUSION:
Right internal mammary artery presented a similar behavior to left internal
mammary artery when anastomosed to the anterior interventricular branch of the
left coronary artery. There was no statistical difference between the measured
flow obtained between both arteries.

BODY.INTRODUCTION:
The first reports of experimental work for a possible myocardial revascularization are
from the mid 50's. A group of researchers from the Soviet Union made the anastomosis of
the left internal thoracic artery to the anterior interventricular branch in
dogs[1]. This work served as the
basis for the reports of the first cases in humans[2]. In 1967. when this study was presented at a cardiology symposium
in Leningrad. the majority of those present agreed to a resolution that said coronary
surgery was impossible and had no future. After more than 40 years after these initial
reports. the surgeries for myocardial revascularization have become one of the most
performed surgeries in the world and certainly the most studied.  Several studies[3-6] show that even after so much time passed and the steady
advance of medicine in the last decades it remains the treatment of choice for patients
with severe coronary disease. Obtaining consistent long-term results after performing
this type of procedure depends mainly on the grafts to be used. The superiority of
arterial grafts over saphenous vein grafts. especially the internal thoracic artery is
well documented[7-9]. Studies comparing these two types of grafts show a
higher patency rate of 90% in 10 years for the internal thoracic artery versus 50% of
saphenous vein grafts. being reflected this difference in increased patient survival.
Furthermore. several studies from different groups were presented showing that the use
of both internal thoracic arteries has a significant survival when a period of 20 years
after surgery is evaluated[10-13].  Most authors agree that the use of both thoracic arteries is beneficial. They also
believe that the right internal thoracic artery should be used mainly in the left
coronary system. especially in the circumflex artery and its branches. by making a
retro-aortic[14] passage.   The use of the right internal thoracic artery to the anterior interventricular branch is
no consensus. In the last joint guideline from the American Heart Association (AHA) and
the Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS)[15]. when the best distribution of grafts according to the coronary
vessels was assessed. the use of the left internal thoracic artery to the anterior
interventricular branch received recommendation IB by keeping as the main graft for this
branch. while the use of the right internal thoracic artery to the same branch was IIA
class. In the present study we assessed fifty patients divided into two groups of
twenty-five comparing them by measuring the flow for traffic time and the behavior of
both thoracic arteries grafted to the anterior interventricular branch of the left
coronary. Our main aim was to determine whether the flow obtained at the anastomosis of
the right internal thoracic artery to the anterior interventricular branch is similar to
the data obtained with the "gold standard" which is the anastomosis of the left internal
thoracic artery to the same branch of the left coronary artery.

BODY.METHODS:
In this retrospective study. we assessed 50 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass
grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. divided into two groups of 25 patients each. In
group A. there are patients who received graft of right internal thoracic artery to the
anterior interventricular branch. In group B. patients who received left internal
thoracic artery to the same branch. In this study. we excluded all patients who required
a procedure associated with revascularization. as well as patients who possibly
undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. In none of the fifty patients conversion to
cardiopulmonary bypass was required.  In both groups. we used general anesthesia. and the approach was median sternotomy. The
manner on which the anesthesia was performed and how the grafts were obtained have been
subject to previous publication[16].
In both groups. the internal thoracic artery was obtained using skeletonization.  The strategy of revascularization differs somewhat between groups. In both cases. we
used a dose of 2 mg/kg of heparin. The initial approach was the same. with the
pericardium opened widely. pulled in its anterior edge on both sides. With the help of a
polyester tape 90 cm long and 3 cm wide. a section by Lima[17] was performed. This was applied between the inferior
vena cava and the left inferior pulmonary vein to better exposure of the heart without
significant changes of hemodynamics. In all fifty patients a suction tissue stabilizer
(Octopuss II ®. Medtronic) to perform anastomosis was used.  Moreover. in most cases. it was performed with an intraluminal shunt. The strategy of
revascularization. on which graft would be directed to coronary branch was decided at
the time of operation. Rather. we chose the retroaortic right internal thoracic artery
to the circumflex artery and its branches and the left internal thoracic artery to the
anterior interventricular branch. The anastomoses are also preferably performed in the
middle third of the coronary artery and. if the graft did not reach the target artery
satisfactorily we reversed the distribution.  In group A. the operation started by anastomosis of the right internal thoracic artery
to the anterior interventricular branch. followed. in cases where it was necessary.
through the sidewall and finally through the anterior interventricular branch. In group
B. the operation started by the anastomoses of the inferior wall. followed by sidewall
and finally the anterior interventricular branch. The approach taken in group B. leaving
the anterior interventricular artery last is due to a fear of injury by traction. This
could occur while performing an anastomosis in the sidewall of an increased ventricle
with the anastomosis of the left internal thoracic artery already performed to the
anterior interventricular branch.  At the end of the anastomoses after heparin reversal. systolic blood pressure was
maintained around 110 mmHg and a heart rate average ranging between 80 and 100 beats per
minute. No patient in the series needed use of vasoactive drugs to obtain the desired
pressure. Moreover. with "3mm probe" (Figure 1)
connected to the flowmeter Medistim brand. model Butterfly Flowmeter. flow measures by
transit time and review of the pulsatility index. PI (Figure 2) were performed. To obtain these values. the patients were kept
under apnea for a period of around 10 seconds. and the "probe" applied to the selected
graft. According to the device manufacturer. flows higher than 10 ml/min. and a
pulsatility index which measures the distal strength below 5 means an anastomosis of
good quality.  Fig. 13 mm Probe  Fig. 2Flow analysis of internal thoracic artery  After evaluation of the anastomoses. the revision of hemostasis and closure of the chest
were performed. Next. still under general anesthesia. patients were referred to the
intensive care unit.  This study received a favorable opinion from the Research Ethics Committee of our
institution under number 20827713.2.0000.0020.

BODY.METHODS.STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
To evaluate the association between two dichotomous qualitative variables we
considered the Fisher exact test. The correlation between quantitative variables was
evaluated by estimating the Pearson correlation coefficient. To compare the two
groups with respect to quantitative variables we used the Student's t test for
independent samples. These comparisons. considering more than two groups were
performed using a model of analysis of variance factor (ANOVA). For multivariate
analysis a model of Multiple Linear Regression was adjusted. P
values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using
the SPSS v.20.0 software.

BODY.RESULTS:
We assessed 50 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without
cardiopulmonary bypass were divided into two groups of 25 each. In group A we put
patients who received internal thoracic artery to the anterior interventricular branch.
In group B we put patients who received a graft of the left internal thoracic artery
graft to the same coronary branch.  In group A. the mean age was 60.6 ± 9.49 ranging between 44 and 82 years and in group B
59.8 ± 9.7 between 43 and 80 years. Patients in group A had a mean weight of 80.4 ±
10.32 kg. The mean weight from B group was 77.7 ± 15.7 kg. The average height of the
group A was 169.2 ± 6.86 cm and in group B 166.0 ± 8.2 cm. Table 1 shows the values of age. weight. height and body mass index
for both groups:   Table 1 Quantitative variables.   Group n Mean Median Minimum Maximum Standard deviation P * value Weight B 25 77.7 79.0 43.0 115.0 15.7   A 25 80.4 80.0 55.0 94.0 10.32 0.485 Height B 25 166.0 165.0 153.0 180.0 8.2   A 25 169.2 170.0 159.0 180.0 6.86 0.131 BMI B 25 28.1 27.3 17.9 47.0 5.3   A 25 28.1 28.2 20.2 34.5 3.31 0.945 Age B 25 59.8 59.0 43.0 80.0 9.7   A 25 60.6 61.0 44.0 82.0 9.49 0.759 BMI - Body Mass Index   In assessing risk factors for coronary disease. in group A 21 (84%) patients were
hypertensive. compared with 18 (72%) in group B (P=0.496). 10 (40%)
patients in group A were diabetics against five (20%) in group B
(P=0.217) and 6 (24%) patients in group A were smokers against seven
(28%) in group B (P=1).  In group A. seven (28%) had undergone previous coronary angioplasty and eight (32%) had
presented myocardial infarction against four (16%) who had undergone angioplasty in
group B and four (16%) with history of myocardial infarction. There was no statistical
difference between the groups regarding previous coronary angioplasty or old myocardial
infarction. Regarding the left ventricular function. if normal. moderate or poor
compromise. Table 2 presents the data from both
groups.  Table 2 Left ventricular function.   Group   B A LV     Normal 12 13   48.00% 52.00% Moderate 8 10   32.00% 40.00% Poor 5 2   20.00% 8.00% Total 25 25   There was no statistical difference between the groups when evaluating left ventricular
function (P: 0.461).  In the assessment of functional class. no patient in group A (0%) were in NYHA class I.
15 (60%) in class II. seven (28%) in class III. and three (12%) in class IV . In group
B. three (12%) were in class I. 14 (56%) in class II. seven (28%) in class III and one
(4%) in class IV. There was no statistical difference (P=0.258) between
the two groups.  Table 3 presents the distribution of the number
of individual grafts per patient in each group.  Table 3 Individual grafts. Number of grafts Group   B A 1 3 0   12.00% 0.00% 2 6 8   24.00% 32.00% 3 12 13   48.00% 52.00% 4 4 3   16.00% 12.00% 6 0 1   0.00% 4.00% Total 25 25   The central point of this study is the evaluation of coronary flow. The evaluation of
the measured flow through the transit time showed an average flow of 42.2 ± 23.4 ml/min
in Group A and 34.2 ± 19.1 ml/min in group B. featuring a statistically significant
difference in favor of group A. We tested the null hypothesis that the mean FLOW is the
same in both groups (RLL and LLL). versus the alternative hypothesis of means that are
not all the same. Table 4 and Figure 3 shows the results obtained.  Table 4 Flow measurement.   Fluow           Group n Mean Median Minimum Maximum Standard deviation P-Value* B 25 34.2 31.0 13.0 82.0 19.1 A 25 42.2 34.0 16.0 94.0 23.4 0.197   Fig. 3Flow Performance  Finally. we assessed the pulsatility index. PI. that determines the resistance after the
anastomosis. The device manufacturer provides measurement values for flow traffic time
of less than 5 as indicative of a good quality anastomosis. In group A. the mean PI was
2.8±0.9 and in group B 2.0±0.7. Table 5 shows
the results obtained from both groups.  Table 5 Pulsatility index.   PI             Group n Mean Median Minimum Maximum Standard deviation P-Value* B 25 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.8 0.7 A 25 2.8 2.9 1.3 4.3 0.9 0.003   Figure 4 shows a representation of the behavior of
pulsatility index in both groups.  Fig. 4Pulsatility index

BODY.DISCUSSION:
During the past 20 years. numerous studies have been published related to the
prevention. diagnosis and surgical treatment of coronary artery disease(18.19). In these studies. the advantage on the use of the thoracic
artery is clearly demonstrated due to its superior patency. showing consistent long-term
results and thus leading to an increased survival. This mainly occurs in groups where
getting better results over the years is less frequent as in women and diabetics.  Currently. the most widely used strategy in coronary artery bypass operations is the use
of an internal thoracic artery accompanied the other saphenous vein grafts[20.21]. However. atherosclerosis of saphenous vein is responsible for
the failure of CABG during the study. A growing number of diabetics has been referred
for surgery due to poor results with coronary angioplasty. There was a reduction in
mortality. 5.8% vs. 20.6%. with respect to results obtained in patients who received at
least one internal thoracic artery[22].  The left internal thoracic artery presents patency greater than 90% after 10 years of
its implantation. This is because less than 1% of them develops atherosclerosis with
severe impairment[23].  As already emphasized above. the use of the mammary artery improves survival of
patients. Studies show that when using both internal thoracic arteries. the survival
increases significantly in 20 years[11-13]. Study presented by Ribeiro et
al.[24] shows very little
difference from the histological point of view between left and right internal thoracic
arteries. noting only that the distal segment of the elastic layer is more
prominent.  With these results clearly established. the central focus revolves around what is the
best distribution for thoracic arteries. which vessel should receive the second thoracic
artery. and especially if it is appropriate to use the right internal thoracic artery to
the anterior interventricular branch of left coronary. As noted earlier. our main
distribution is the same advocated by Gerola et al.[14] with the right internal thoracic artery directed to the
circumflex artery and its branches through a retroaortic course.  The flow measurement by transit time became available for clinical use in the late
90s[25,26]. It is a quick. simple and objective way to verify the quality
of the anastomosis in coronary surgeries. Flows below 10 ml/min associated with a
pulsatility index greater than 5 indicate problems. The pulsatility index. PI. is a
number obtained by dividing the difference between the maximum flow and minimum flow by
mean flow[26].  One of the first studies on the flow measurement by transit time was published in 1998
by Walpoth et al.[25]. In this study.
the authors assessed 46 anastomoses of the left internal thoracic artery to the anterior
interventricular branch. Of these. 43 had normal PI flow and. in the other three after
anastomosis is performed again the PI flow has been normalized. Based on these data. the
authors concluded that the measured flow by transit time is simple. reproducible and
easy to perform. Moreover. they concluded that a low flow in the graft with a high PI
indicates need for revision of the anastomosis and after that the values tend to
normalize. They also confirmed that this type of flow measurement is cost-effective and
probably prevents hemodynamic instability in the immediate postoperative period.  Leong et al.[27] assessed 116 patients
with a total of 322 grafts. with 125 arterial and 197 venous. They performed the
measurement of flow by transit time. The average flow for the internal thoracic artery
to the anterior interventricular branch was 37.4 ± 23.5 ml/min and 21.2 to 36 ml/min in
the other grafts. In six patients the anastomosis error was detected and that being
performed again. The authors found no statistical difference between PI flow or arterial
and venous grafts. They concluded stating that this type of coronary flowmetry provides
important and reliable information about the patency of each graft individually. It is
able to accurately detect folds. twists and significant stenoses in grafts. allowing
their immediate correction.  In our country. Cerqueira Neto et al.[28] published a study showing the measured flow of the left internal
thoracic artery to the anterior interventricular branch in patients who underwent
surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. concluding that there is no difference
in flow between these two situations.  In our series. we assessed two groups of 25 patients each. comparing the performance of
the left internal thoracic artery to the right internal thoracic artery. when grafted to
the anterior interventricular branch. Many surgeons still have some fear of putting the
right internal thoracic artery to the anterior interventricular branch. The two groups
were similar with respect to weight. height and age. In the group in which the right
internal thoracic artery was used there were more diabetic patients. but without
statistical difference.  When evaluating flow. the group of left internal thoracic artery had an average flow of
34.2±19.1 versus 42.2±23.4 ml/min in the right thoracic artery group. Despite the
increase. there was no significant difference between the two groups. In assessing the
pulsatility index. PI. the first group had a mean PI of 2.0±0.7 vs.
2.8±0.9 in the second group. Despite the difference between the groups is significant
(P=0.003). the values obtained in the group in which the thoracic
artery was used showed values within the normal range. or that is. a PI below 5.  In this present series. despite the use of two internal thoracic arteries in most
patients. there were no cases of mediastinitis. There was no mortality.

BODY.CONCLUSION:
The results obtained in our study suggest that the right internal thoracic artery when
anastomosed to the anterior interventricular branch presents an initial behavior very
similar to that of the left internal thoracic artery. In cases where the left internal
thoracic artery needs to be anastomosed to another coronary branch or that it is not
available. the right internal thoracic artery should be considered as the substitute of
choice. The initial flow obtained when comparing the right and left arteries showed no
significant difference.

Question: Compared to (B group) graft of left internal mammary artery to the same branch what was the result of (A group) graft of right internal mammary artery to the anterior interventricular branch on assessment of functional class - NYHA class?
Evidence: The central point of this study is the evaluation of coronary flow. The evaluation of
the measured flow through the transit time showed an average flow of 42.2 ± 23.4 ml/min
in Group A and 34.2 ± 19.1 ml/min in group B. featuring a statistically significant
difference in favor of group A. 
Answer: no significant difference