Question: Did the Kennedy v. Louisiana and Riley v. California rulings both take place in the same year ?
Context: People v. Diaz 51 Cal.  4th 84, 244 P.3d 501, 119 Cal.  Rptr.  3d 105 (Cal.  January 3, 2011) was a Supreme Court of California case holding that police are not required to obtain a warrant to search information contained within a cell phone in a lawful arrest.  In a sting operation conducted by local police, the defendant, Gregory Diaz, was arrested for the sale of the illicit drug ecstasy and his cell phone, containing incriminating evidence, was seized and searched without a warrant.  In trial court proceedings, Diaz motioned to suppress the information obtained from his cell phone, which was denied on the grounds that the search of his cell phone was incident to a lawful arrest.  The California Court of Appeal affirmed the court's decision, a ruling which was later upheld by the California Supreme Court.  In 2014, the United States Supreme Court overruled that position in "Riley v. California", holding that without a warrant, police may not search the digital information on a cell phone that has been seized incident to arrest. Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008) , is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause prohibits imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child in cases where the victim did not die and death was not intended. Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) , held that the death penalty for rape of an adult woman was grossly disproportionate and excessive punishment, and therefore unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  A few states continued to have child rape statutes that authorized the death penalty.  In "Kennedy v. Louisiana" (2008), the court expanded "Coker", ruling that the death penalty is unconstitutional in all cases that do not involve murder or crimes against the State. The Louisiana State Treasurer special election will take place on October 14, 2017, to elect the State Treasurer of Louisiana, with a runoff election to be held on November 18, 2017, if necessary.  Incumbent Republican State Treasurer John Kennedy was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2016.  First Assistant Treasurer Ron Henson replaced Kennedy as Treasurer, and will serve until the special election.  Henson will not run in the special election. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in "Obergefell v. Hodges" on June 26, 2015, held that the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples is unconstitutional, invalidating the ban on same-sex marriage in Louisiana.  The ruling clarified conflicting court rulings on whether Louisianian officials are obligated to license same-sex marriages. Governor Bobby Jindal confirmed on June 28 that Louisiana would comply with the ruling once the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed its decision in a Louisiana case, which the Fifth Circuit did on July 1.  Jindal then said the state would not comply with the ruling until the federal District Court reversed its judgment, which it did on July 2.  All parishes now issue marriage licenses in accordance with federal law. In U.S. law, the bad tendency principle is a test which permits restriction of freedom of speech by government if it is believed that a form of speech has a sole tendency to incite or cause illegal activity.  The principle, formulated in "Patterson v. Colorado", (1907) was seemingly overturned with the "clear and present danger" principle used in the landmark case "Schenck v. United States" (1919), as stated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Yet eight months later, at the start of the next Term in "Abrams v. United States" (1919) the Court again used the bad tendency test to uphold the conviction of a Russian immigrant who published and distributed leaflets calling for a general strike and otherwise advocated revolutionary, anarchist, and socialist views.  Holmes dissented in "Abrams", explaining how the "clear and present danger test" should be employed to overturn Abrams' conviction.  The arrival of the "bad tendency" test resulted in a string of politically incorrect rulings such as Whitney v. California (1927), where a woman was convicted simply because of her association with the Communist Party.  The court ruled unanimously that although she had not committed any crimes, her relationship with the Communists represented a "bad tendency" and thus was unprotected.  The "bad tendency" test was finally overturned in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) and was replaced by the "imminent lawless action" test. Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963) , was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court amended United States nationality law with respect to draft evasion. Aniversario: Never Compromise was a professional wrestling internet pay-per-view (iPPV) event produced by the Chikara promotion, that took place on June 2, 2013, at the Trocadero Theatre in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  The event marked Chikara's fourth iPPV, third to take place at the Trocadero Theatre and the promotion's only event to take place in Philadelphia in 2013.  Much like the previous iPPV, Under the Hood, Aniversario: Never Compromise also aired through Smart Mark Video.  Aniversario: Never Compromise celebrated Chikara's eleventh anniversary and was the first anniversary event to take place on iPPV; in the past, the promotion had celebrated its anniversaries with weekends of two shows.  The event saw all three Chikara championships being defended with one title change, where Pieces of Hate (Jigsaw and The Shard) defeated 3.0 (Scott Parker and Shane Matthews) for the Campeonatos de Parejas.  Another major match during the event saw former Campeones de Parejas, Amasis and Ophidian, end their nineteen-month storyline rivalry in a Sarcophagus match.  The event concluded with a major storyline development, where Chikara's authority figure Wink Vavasseur ended the event and shut down the promotion, while the main event was still going on in the ring, leading to the promotion going inactive for a full year. "The Constitution is not a suicide pact" is a phrase in American political and legal discourse.  The phrase expresses the belief that constitutional restrictions on governmental power must be balanced against the need for survival of the state and its people.  It is most often attributed to Abraham Lincoln, as a response to charges that he was violating the United States Constitution by suspending "habeas corpus" during the American Civil War.  Although the phrase echoes statements made by Lincoln, and although versions of the sentiment have been advanced at various times in American history, the precise phrase "suicide pact" was first used in this context by Justice Robert H. Jackson in his dissenting opinion in "Terminiello v. Chicago", a 1949 free speech case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.  The phrase also appears in the same context in "Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez", a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision written by Justice Arthur Goldberg. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. __ (2014) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional.
Answer: no