Question: Which case regarded juveniles as separate types of defendants, In re Gault or Ford v. Wainwright?
Context: Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, ruling that criminal defendants sentenced to death may not be executed if they do not understand the reason for their imminent execution, and that once the state has set an execution date death-row inmates may litigate their competency to be executed in "habeas corpus" proceedings.  This decision reaffirmed the Court's prior holdings in "Ford v. Wainwright", 477 U.S. 399 (1986) , and "Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal", 523 U.S. 637 (1998) . Parasitic drag is drag that results when an object is moved through a fluid medium.  In the case of aerodynamic drag, the fluid medium is the atmosphere.  Parasitic drag is a combination of form drag, skin friction drag and interference drag.  The other components of total drag, induced drag, wave drag, and ram drag, are separate types of drag, and are not components of parasitic drag.  Parasitic drag does not result from the induction of lift on the body, hence it is considered parasitic. Jamrieng Samai (ចម្រៀងសម័យ) is a genre of pop music from Cambodia.  The slower dance music, ramvong and ramkbach are the two separate types of Jamrieng samai. Adams v Lindsell (1818) 1 B & Ald 681, is an English contract case regarded as the first case towards the establishment of the "postal rule" for acceptance of an offer.  Ordinarily, any form of acceptance must be communicated expressly to an offeror; however, it was found that where a letter of acceptance is posted, an offer is accepted "in course of post". In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) , was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel.  The court's opinion was written by Justice Abe Fortas, a noted proponent of children's rights. Two separate types of diesel locomotive operating in Great Britain have been given the TOPS classification Class 21. The Ford V platform is an automobile platform produced by Ford Motor Company for minivans designed in North America.  Introduced for the 1999 model year, it replaced minivans designed on the Ford D186 platform (shared with the mid-size Ford Taurus).  After 2007, the V platform was discontinued in favor of large CUVs based on the Ford D3 and D4 platforms. SEC v. Rajaratnam, No. 622 F.3d 159 (2d Cir.  2010), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case in which defendants Raj Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi appealed a discovery order issued by a district court during a civil trial against them for insider trading filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  The district court compelled the defendants to disclose to the SEC the contents of thousands of wiretapped conversations that were originally obtained by the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) and were turned over to the defendants during a separate criminal trial. Louie Lee Wainwright (born September 11, 1923) was Secretary of the Florida Division of Corrections from 1962 to 1987, more than a quarter of a century.  He is most famous for being the named respondent in two U.S. Supreme Court cases: "Gideon v. Wainwright" in which indigents are guaranteed an attorney, and "Ford v. Wainwright", in which the Court approved the common law rule prohibiting the execution of the insane.  Time Magazine called the "Gideon" decision one of the ten most important legal events of the 1960s.  He also appeared as the respondent in a number of habeas corpus petitions that reached the Supreme Court level during his long tenure in office, making "Wainwright" one of the most familiar names to students of habeas corpus law. Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) , was a U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the common law rule that the insane cannot be executed; therefore the petitioner is entitled to a competency evaluation and to an evidentiary hearing in court on the question of their competency to be executed.
Answer: In re Gault