Question: What person's criminal case has Park Dietz been involved in where the criminal was convicted of murdering five people?
Context: The Ranbir Singh fake encounter case is an ongoing criminal case in the Uttarakhand state of India, took place on 3 July 2009, and involved fake encounter killings of Ranbir Singh, a 22-year-old MBA graduate in Dehradun.  Delhi court has convicted 17 officers of the Uttarakhand Police for killing in a 2009 fake encounter that had rocked the hill state.  This is the highest number of police personnel to be convicted in a fake encounter case in India. Criminal Case (commonly abbreviated as "CC") is a detective-themed hidden object game released on November 15, 2012 for Facebook.  An iOS version was released worldwide on August 28, 2014, followed by an Android version on April 15, 2015.  Developed and published by French indie studio Pretty Simple, "Criminal Case" has over ten million average monthly users.  "Criminal Case" has become a very popular game since the start of 2013 and also has been highly competitive with "Candy Crush Saga", the most popular game on Facebook with over 46 million average monthly users.  On December 9, 2013, "Criminal Case" was crowned the Facebook Game of the Year 2013, surpassing "Candy Crush". Richard Leonard Kuklinski (April 11, 1935 – March 5, 2006) was an American contract killer and serial killer who was convicted of murdering five people, though he likely killed at least several dozen more.  He was associated with members of the American Mafia, namely the DeCavalcante crime family of Newark, New Jersey, and the Five Families of New York City. Park Dietz (born 1948) is a forensic psychiatrist who has consulted or testified in many of the highest profile US criminal cases including Joel Rifkin, Arthur Shawcross, Jeffrey Dahmer, The Unabomber, Richard Kuklinski, the Beltway sniper attacks, and Jared Lee Loughner. People v. Bland, 28 Cal.  4th 313 (2002), is a United States criminal case interpreting attempted murder.  The defendant fired multiple shots into a car with three people, killing the driver, and injuring the other two.  The evidence showed he intended to kill the driver, but did not specifically intend to kill the others.  The court wrote "The crime of attempt sanctions what the person intended to do but did not accomplish, not unintended and unaccomplished potential consequences."  However, the court found a person could concurrently intend to kill more than just the person targeted, both the target and others in the "kill zone" of the shots, such as when a person sets off a bomb targeting a person who is surrounded by others, who would be guilty of murder of everyone killed by the blast. United States v. Jackalow, 66 U.S. (1 Black) 484 (1862), is a U.S. Supreme Court case interpreting the Venue and Vicinage clauses of the United States Constitution.  It was an "unusual criminal case", and one of the few constitutional criminal cases from the Taney Court.  Jackalow, a mariner from the Ryukyu Islands, was suspected of the robbery and murder of the captain of the sloop "Spray", Jonathan Leete, and Jonathan's brother Elijah, while the ship was at sea.  He was convicted of robbery in the Long Island Sound, but as there was disagreement over the question of jurisdiction between the two judges who heard the post-trial motion – Judge Mahlon Dickerson and Supreme Court Justice Robert Cooper Grier – the case was referred to the Supreme Court by certificate of division. In New York City, a desk appearance ticket (DAT) is an order to appear in the New York City Criminal Court for an arraignment.  A person who receives a DAT has been arrested.  The DAT is simply one of two alternative means by which a person who is arrested appears for arraignment, or first appearance.  A person who receives a DAT is permitted to appear in court on their own on the date indicated on the DAT document.  A person who does not receive a DAT is processed through the arrest to arraignment system and is supposed to have their arraignment within 24 hours.  From the point that the case is arraigned, a DAT case is like any other criminal case.  DATs are usually only issued for misdemeanors in which there is little chance that the defendant will flee the jurisdiction; currently, DATs may be issued for violation, misdemeanors, and "E" felonies.  If a person fails to return to court on the date indicated on the DAT, the Court will issue an arrest warrant. Sheikh Thambi Pavalar (Tamil: செய்கு தம்பி பாவலர் ) (1874–1950) was a Tamil poet, scholar and an Indian independence activist.  He was born on 31 July 1874 as the third son of Pakeer Meeran sahib and Ameena.  He had his earlier education at Edalakudy.  He was also a good orator.  He learned Arabic language in his early age and was a disciple of Sankaranarayana Pattariar, a Tamil scholar lived in Kottar.  He was well versed in ‘Kamba Ramayana’.  In the year 1859, he worked as the editor of two Tamil magazines namely ‘Yatharthavadhi’ and ‘Islamic Mithran’ in Chennai.  He wrote and published books - Kottatru Pillai Tamil, Alahappa Kovai, Pathirruppaththu Anthathi, Deavalogathu criminal case, Vedantha vivahara criminal case and also wrote commentaries of ‘Seerapuranam’, which contained 5,027 poems. The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act.  This is contrasted with an excuse of provocation, in which defendant is responsible, but the responsibility is lessened due to a temporary mental state.  It is also contrasted with a finding that a defendant cannot stand trial in a criminal case because a mental disease prevents them from effectively assisting council, from a civil finding in trusts and estates where a will is nullified because it was made when a mental disorder prevented a testator from recognizing the natural objects of their bounty, and from involuntary civil commitment to a mental institution, when a person is found to be gravely disabled or to be a danger to themselves or to others. Winny copyright infringement criminal case in Japan was a Japanese criminal case in which Isamu Kaneko, the developer of P2P file-sharing program Winny, was indicted for aiding in copyright infringement.  This was the first case in which a computer program developer faced a criminal charge for assisting in the copyright infringement of the program's users.  In 2006, the Kyoto District Court found Kaneko guilty and fined him ¥1.5 million.  On appeal, the Osaka High Court in 2009 overturned the lower court's decision, acquitting Kaneko.  Finally, in 2011, the Supreme Court of Japan upheld the acquittal, holding that Kaneko did not intentionally induce infringement and was therefore not responsible for the users' unlawful actions.
Answer: Richard Kuklinski