Question: The Definist fallacy was coined to the philosopher who taught at what college?
Context: The definist fallacy is a logical fallacy, coined by William Frankena in 1939, that involves the definition of one property in terms of another. Affective fallacy is a term from literary criticism used to refer to the supposed error of judging or evaluating a text on the basis of its emotional effects on a reader.  The term was coined by W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley as a principle of New Criticism which is often paired with their study of the "The Intentional Fallacy". The descriptive fallacy refers to reasoning which treats a speech act as a logical proposition, which would be mistaken when the meaning of the statement is not based on its truth condition.  It was suggested by the British philosopher of language J. L. Austin in 1955 in the lectures now known as "How to Do Things With Words".  Austin argued that performative utterances are not meaningfully evaluated as true or false but rather by other measures, which would hold that a statement such as "thank you" is not meant to describe a fact and to interpret it as such would be to commit the descriptive fallacy. William Klaas Frankena (June 21, 1908 – October 22, 1994) was an American moral philosopher.  He was a member of the University of Michigan's department of philosophy for 41 years (1937–1978), and chair of the department for 14 years (1947–1961). The historical fallacy is a logical fallacy originally described by philosopher John Dewey in "The Psychological Review" in 1896.  Most simply put, the fallacy occurs when a person reads into a process the results that occur only because of that process.  Dewey writes: Bulverism is a logical fallacy that combines a genetic fallacy with circular reasoning.  The method of Bulverism is to "assume that your opponent is wrong, and explain his error".  The Bulverist assumes a speaker's argument is invalid or false and then explains "why" the speaker came to make that mistake, attacking the speaker or the speaker's motive.  The term "Bulverism" was coined by C. S. Lewis to poke fun at a very serious error in thinking that, he alleges, recurs often in a variety of religious, political, and philosophical debates. The definist fallacy can refer to three logical fallacies related to how terms are defined in an argument. The inverse gambler's fallacy, named by philosopher Ian Hacking, is a formal fallacy of Bayesian inference which is an inverse of the better known gambler's fallacy.  It is the fallacy of concluding, on the basis of an unlikely outcome of a random process, that the process is likely to have occurred many times before.  For example, if one observes a pair of fair dice being rolled and turning up double sixes, it is wrong to suppose that this lends any support to the hypothesis that the dice have been rolled many times before.  We can see this from the Bayesian update rule: letting "U" denote the unlikely outcome of the random process and "M" the proposition that the process has occurred many times before, we have Attacking Faulty Reasoning is a textbook on logical fallacies by T. Edward Damer that has been used for many years in a number of college courses on logic, critical thinking, argumentation, and philosophy.  It explains 60 of the most commonly committed fallacies.  Each of the fallacies is concisely defined and illustrated with several relevant examples.  For each fallacy, the text gives suggestions about how to address or to "attack" the fallacy when it is encountered.  The organization of the fallacies comes from the author’s own fallacy theory, which defines a fallacy as a violation of one of the five criteria of a good argument: the argument must be structurally well-formed; the premises must be relevant; the premises must be acceptable; the premises must be sufficient in number, weight, and kind; there must be an effective rebuttal of challenges to the argument.  Each fallacy falls into at least one of Damer's five fallacy categories, which derive from the above criteria. The mind projection fallacy is a logical fallacy first described by physicist and Bayesian philosopher E.T. Jaynes.  It occurs when someone thinks that the way they see the world reflects the way the world really is, going as far as assuming the real existence of imagined objects.  That is, someone's subjective judgments are "projected" to be inherent properties of an object, rather than being related to personal perception.  One consequence is that others may be assumed to share the same perception, or that they are irrational or misinformed if they do not.
Answer: University of Michigan