Question: Which case occured first, Strickland v. Washington or Barron v. Baltimore?
Context: Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.)  243 (1833), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which helped define the concept of federalism in US constitutional law.  The Court established a precedent that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the state governments. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. Falls Road station is a Baltimore Light Rail station in Baltimore, Maryland.  It is the first stop in surrounding suburban Baltimore County while traveling north from downtown Baltimore.  The stop is located near the Mount Washington neighborhood in the Jones Falls Valley, and is often used by commuters as a back-up to Mount Washington for parking when the lot at Mt. Washington is full.  The station is adjacent to Lake Roland Park and Dam (renamed Robert E. Lee Park in the 1940s), constructed in the late 1850s as part of the first segment of the city's new public water supply system in 1860 along the upper Jones Falls stream which flows south through the city emptying into the Inner Harbor of the Patapsco River of Baltimore Harbor and can be viewed from certain parts of the park.  Although only used for several decades as part of the metropolitan area's public water system until shifting in the 1880s to a larger flowing supply piped from the Gunpowder Falls and construction of the first phase at the Loch Raven Reservoir and its taller Dam.  Old Lake Roland and Dam are still owned by the City of Baltimore's Department of Recreation and Parks with its surrounding forested watershed, it is now operated and managed by its partner agency, the Baltimore County Department of Recreation and Parks through a recent contract agreement. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) , was a landmark United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."  Specifically, it struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence.  In the process, "Whitney v. California" (1927) was explicitly overruled, and doubt was cast on "Schenck v. United States" (1919), "Abrams v. United States" (1919), "Gitlow v. New York" (1925), and "Dennis v. United States" (1951). R v Sinclair 2010 35 is a leading case from the Supreme Court of Canada on a detainee's right to counsel under section 10(b) of the "Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Specifically, the case addresses two issues regarding the police's implementation duty under the right to counsel: 1) does a detainee have the right to have a lawyer present during police questioning, and 2) does a detainee have the right to make multiple phone calls to their lawyer.  A majority of the Court answered the first question in the negative, and answered the second question in the negative, subject to a change of circumstances.  The parties to the case were the appellant, Sinclair, the respondent, the Attorney General of British Columbia, and the following interveners: the Attorney General of Ontario, the Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, the Criminal Lawyers' Association of Ontario, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.  The case was part of a trilogy of cases released by the Supreme Court, along with "R v Willier" and "R v McCrimmon". Strickland v. Sony was a court case whose central focus was on whether violent video games played a role in Devin Moore's first-degree murder/shooting of three people in a police station.  In August 2005, former attorney Jack Thompson filed the lawsuit against Sony. Barron v Potter [1914] 1 Ch 895 is a UK company law case, concerning the balance of power between the board of directors and the general meeting.  It stands for the principle that when the board is incapable of taking action, power to conduct the company's affairs will revert to the general meeting. West v. Barnes, 2 U.S. 401 (1791), was the first United States Supreme Court decision and the earliest case calling for oral argument. " Van Staphorst v. Maryland" (1791) was docketed prior to "West v. Barnes" but settled before the Court heard the case: "West" was argued on August 2, 1791 and decided on August 3, 1791. " Collet v. Collet" (1791) was the first appellate case docketed with the Court but was dropped before it could be heard.  Supreme Court Reporter Alexander Dallas did not publish the justices' full opinions in "West v. Barnes", which were published in various newspapers around the country at the time, but he published an abbreviated summary of the decisions. Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 468, also known as the Concrete Pipes Case, is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the scope of the corporations power in section 51(xx) of the Australian Constitution.  This was an important case in Australian constitutional law because it overruled the decision in the earlier case of "Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead" (1909) 8 CLR 330, which held that the corporations power only extended as far as the regulation of their conduct in relation to their transactions with or affecting the public.  Since this case, the Commonwealth has had at least the ability to regulate the trading activities of trading corporations, thus opening the way for an expansion in Commonwealth power. Van Staphorst v. Maryland, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.)  401 (1791), was the first case docketed with the United States Supreme Court.  Although the court agreed to hear and decide the case, the suit was settled before oral arguments. " Collet v. Collet" was the first appellate case docketed with the court. " West v. Barnes" was the first case decided by the court.
Answer: Barron v. Baltimore