BACKGROUND: Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used in neonates to measure brain activity changes that are evoked by noxious events, such as clinically required immunisations, cannulation and heel lancing for blood tests. EEG provides an alternative approach to infer pain experience in infants compared with more commonly used behavioural and physiological pain assessments. Establishing the generalisability and construct validity of these measures will help corroborate the use of brain-derived outcomes to evaluate the efficacy of new or existing pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to treat neonatal pain. This study aimed to test whether a measure of noxious-evoked EEG activity called the noxious neurodynamic response function (n-NRF), that was originally derived in a sample of term-aged infants at the Oxford John Radcliffe Hospital, UK, in 2017, can reliably distinguish noxious from non-noxious events in two independent datasets collected at University College London Hospital and at Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital. We aimed to reproduce three published results that use this measure to quantify noxious-evoked changes in brain activity. We used the n-NRF to quantify noxious-evoked brain activity to test (i) whether significantly larger noxious-evoked activity is recorded in response to a clinical heel lance compared to a non-noxious control heel lance procedure; (ii) whether the magnitude of the activity evoked by a noxious heel lance is equivalent in independent cohorts of infants; and (iii) whether the magnitude of the noxious-evoked brain activity increases with postmenstrual age (PMA) in premature infants up to 37 weeks PMA. Positive replication of these studies will build confidence in the use of the n-NRF as a valid and reliable pain-related outcome which could be used to evaluate analgesic efficacy in neonates. The protocol for this study was published following peer review (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZY9MS).
RESULTS: The n-NRF magnitude to a noxious heel lance stimulus was significantly greater than to a non-noxious control heel lance stimulus in both the UCL dataset (n = 60; mean difference .88; 95% confidence interval (CI) .64-1.13; p < .0001) and the Exeter dataset (n = 31; mean difference .31; 95% CI .02-.61; p = .02). The mean magnitude and 90% bootstrap confidence interval of the n-NRF evoked by the heel lance did not meet our pre-defined equivalence bounds of 1.0 ± .2 in either the UCL dataset (n = 72; mean magnitude 1.33; 90% bootstrapped CI 1.18-1.52) or the Exeter dataset (n = 35; mean magnitude .92, 90% bootstrapped CI .74-1.22). The magnitude of the n-NRF to the noxious stimulus was significantly positively correlated with PMA in infants up to 37 weeks PMA (n = 65; one-sided Pearson's R, adjusted for site: .24; 95% CI .06-1.00; p = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: We have reproduced in independent datasets the findings that the n-NRF response to a noxious stimulus is significantly greater than to a non-noxious stimulus, and that the noxious-evoked EEG response increases with PMA. The pre-defined equivalence bounds for the mean magnitude of the EEG response were not met, though this might be due to either inter-site differences such as the lack of calibration of devices between sites (a true negative) or underpowering (a false negative). This reproducibility study provides robust evidence that supports the use of the n-NRF as an objective outcome for clinical trials assessing acute nociception in neonates. Use of the n-NRF in this way has the potential to transform the way analgesic efficacy studies are performed.