In line with the results of the power analysis using the Gpower 3.1.9.2 program, it was planned to include 31 patients in reiki, 31 patients in sham reiki and 31 patients in the control group, and the simple randomization method was used to distribute the sample to the study groups. Research data were collected in a quiet single room in the operating room Pre-op Unit and in the patient rooms of General Surgery I and II Clinics between July 2020 and December 2020. In order to determine the clarity of the data collection form, after obtaining permission from the ethics committee and pre-application with 12 patients who met the study criteria, "Personal Information Form", "Patient Follow-up Form" and Postoperative Period Patient Analgesic Follow-up Form" and "Reiki-Related Feedback Form" were prepared. filled. Application" Data were collected before and after reiki in the Pre-op unit on the 0th day before the operation, and in the General Surgery I and II clinics on the 1st and 2nd days after the operation. After obtaining the consent of the patient in the preoperative unit, the Personal Information Form, the Surgical Fear Scale and the STAI-I State Anxiety Scale were applied, and the results and vital findings after SPO2 were recorded in the Patient Follow-up. Form. According to randomization, the patients in the reiki/sham reiki group were taken to a quiet single room and reiki/sham reiki was applied for approximately 25-30 minutes. Done. Reiki application was applied by a researcher who received Reiki II level training, and sham reiki was applied by a health professional who did not receive reiki training. A written protocol is provided to both the Reiki practitioner and Sham Reiki practitioner describing hand positions, areas of practice, sequence and times. 5 minutes after the end of the application, the "Surgical Fear Scale" and the "STAI-I State Anxiety Scale" were re-administered, the patient's SPO2 and vital signs were taken again. In the control group according to randomization. The "Surgical Fear Scale" and the "STAI-I State Anxiety Scale" were applied and the patient's vital signs and SPO2 were measured. 30 minutes from assessment. Then, all measurements were repeated and recorded on the Patient Follow-up Form.

On the 1st and 2nd postoperative days, 4 hours after the routine analgesic drug administration, pulse, respiratory rate, blood pressure and SPO2 were measured and recorded in the patient follow-up form. After assessing the severity of pain with the "Visual Comparison Scale" and the anxiety with the "STAI-I State Anxiety Inventory", the patient was evaluated once a day for 25-30 minutes, depending on the group he was in. minute reiki/sham reiki was applied. 5 minutes after the end of the application. Then, the patient's pulse, respiratory rate, blood pressure and SPO2 were measured again and recorded in the Patient Follow-up Form. The severity of pain was re-evaluated with the "Visual Comparison Scale" and the state anxiety level with the "STAI-I State Anxiety Inventory". The analgesic doses/numbers used on the 1st and 2nd days were recorded in the "Analgesic Usage Follow-up Form". Routine postoperative care was given to the control group without any intervention, and data collection tools were applied at the same time as the experimental group twice at 30-minute intervals. After the final evaluation on the 2nd day, Reiki and Sham Reiki were applied to the group, and the "Reiki Application Feedback Form" was applied.

Statistical analyzes were performed using a package program called SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 24). Frequency tables and descriptive statistics were used to interpret the findings. Parametric methods were used for measurement values suitable for normal distribution. The "Independent Sample-t" test (t-table value) was used and the "ANOVA" test (F-table value) method was used to compare the measurement values of two independent groups in accordance with parametric methods. Compare the measurement values of three or more independent groups. The "Paired Sample-t" test (t-table value) method was used to compare the measurement values of the two dependent groups. Non-parametric methods were used for the measurement values that did not fit the normal distribution. "Mann-Whitney U" test (Z-table value) and "Kruskal-Wallis H" test (χ2-table value) were used to compare the measured values of two independent groups in accordance with non-parametric methods. ) method was used to compare the measurement values of three or more independent groups. . The "Wilcoxon" test (Z-table value) method was used to compare the measurement values of the two dependent groups.