anthonyyazdaniml/gliner-biomed-curated-corpus huggingface dataset:
Following single or repeated intranasal applications of 0.2 gram of BACTROBAN NASAL 3 times daily for 3 days to 5 healthy adult male subjects, no evidence of systemic absorption of mupirocin was demonstrated. The dosage regimen used in this study was for pharmacokinetic characterization only. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION for proper clinical dosing information.)

In this study, the concentrations of mupirocin in urine and of monic acid in urine and serum were below the limit of determination of the assay for up to 72 hours after the applications. The lowest levels of determination of the assay used were 50 ng/mL of mupirocin in urine, 75 ng/mL of monic acid in urine, and 10 ng/mL of monic acid in serum. Based on the detectable limit of the urine assay for monic acid, one can extrapolate that a mean of 3.3% (range: 1.2 to 5.1%) of the applied dose could be systemically absorbed from the nasal mucosa of adults.

Data from a report of a pharmacokinetic study in neonates and premature infants indicate that, unlike in adults, significant systemic absorption occurred following intranasal administration of BACTROBAN NASAL in this population. At this time, the pharmacokinetic properties of mupirocin following intranasal application of BACTROBAN NASAL have not been adequately characterized in neonates or other children less than 12 years of age, and in addition, the safety of the product in children less than 12 years of age has not been established.

The effect of the concurrent application of intranasal mupirocin calcium ointment, 2% with other intranasal products has not been studied. (See PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions.)

Following intravenous or oral administration, mupirocin is rapidly metabolized. The principal metabolite, monic acid, demonstrates no antibacterial activity. In a study conducted in 7 healthy adult male subjects, the elimination half-life after intravenous administration of mupirocin was 20 to 40 minutes for mupirocin and 30 to 80 minutes for monic acid. Monic acid is predominantly eliminated by renal excretion. The pharmacokinetics of mupirocin has not been studied in individuals with renal insufficiency.
COVAPID is a multicenter cohort study with two retrospective control groups. No intervention will be performed in included patients, only patient characteristics and data on VA-LRTI will be collected.

Patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia, admitted to the participating ICUs from the start of COVID epidemic will be eligible for this study. Those admitted before the beginning of this study will be included retrospectively, and those admitted after the beginning of the study will be included prospectively. 10-20 patients per center will be included in this group. SARSCoV2 infection will be confirmed by a nasopharyngeal PCR or respiratory secretions (tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage) PCR. Two retrospective groups will be constituted in order to give some insight of potential impact of SARS-CoV2 infection on the incidence of VALRTI :1) Influenza group : patients with influenza (A or B) community-acquired pneumonia. All patients with influenza community acquired pneumonia and admitted in the same ICU will be eligible in this group.

The number of patients included in this group per center will be similar as that of patients included in the SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia group (10-20 patients). These consecutive patients will by identified using the files of Virology Lab. The first included patient will be the last of the current influenza season (2019-2020), and others will be taken consecutively back to 2019 of 2018 if necessary. PCR (nasopharyngeal or respiratory secretions) confirmation of influenza (A ou B) is required for patients in this group. 2) No viral infection group: patients with no viral community acquired pneumonia. All patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48h before COVID epidemic, for any reason other than viral pneumonia are eligible for this group. The number of included patients in this group will be similar as that of patients included in the SARS-CoV-2 group in the same center (10-20 patients) These consecutive patients will be included starting at the end of January 2020 and going back to 2019 if necessary. VAT and VAP are defined using clinical, radiological and quantitative microbiological criteria.
A first dose of 24 capsules of FMT placebo at baseline and a second dose of 24 capsules of FMT placebo at 3 months. Each dose (24 capsules) contains in total 6 g of microcrystalline cellulose or equivalent.
The patient rolled to his side, the level between T9 and T10 identified using ultrasound. An 8-14 MHz curved array probe (Siemens ACUSON X300 Ultrasound System) will be applied longitudinal orientation 3 cm lateral midline. The erector spinae and the psoas muscle will be identified. A skin wheal will be made using lidocaine 1% at each level and then a 22-gauge, 8 cm Tuohy needle (Perifix Epidural Needle) will be advanced inplane until contact with the transverse process. The needle will be withdrawn slightly and 30cc of bupivacaine 0.25 % (15ml for each side) will be injected slowly after negative aspiration confirmed. The same procedure will be repeated in the contralateral side.
Subjects who are willing to participate in a novel treatment for Revian Red All LED cap will be enrolled in this study. The cap uses two wavelengths of light, 620 nm and 660 nm. A study cap will be provided for each subject. Subjects will use the cap once daily, 10-minute treatment regimen which is the current androgenetic alopecia recommendation. The subjects will use the cap for a total of 6 months. To use the cap, subjects will connect the Revian Red All LED cap to a Smart App on a mobile phone device using Bluetooth. Subjects can use the Smart App to set daily reminders to use the cap, track and log usage, and use the 10 minute timer. No additional information will be stored on the Smart App. Only subjects will have access to the Smart App located on their personal mobile phone device.

Standardized photos and trichoscopic photos before starting treatment and every 2 months for x 6 total months will be taken to assess hairline stabilization and potential for regrowth. A baseline photo and completion photo will also be taken with a visio device. This will help determine pigmentation of the present hairs throughout the study.

Prior to study enrollment, all participants will receive a detailed explanation of the purpose of the study and will undergo written informed consent. Clinical history of hair loss and history of prior treatment will be obtained by administering a standardized questionnaire to all subjects. Subjects will also fill out a questionnaire regarding symptoms of their hair loss at each visit. There will be 4 visits total (1 Pre-treatment visit and 3 Follow up visits).
Catalog Number 601,602.

Sodium Iodide I 123 is supplied as capsules for oral administration in strengths of 3.7 MBq (100 µCi) (red and white) (NDC 69945-601-10) and 7.4 MBq (200 µCi) (green and white) (NDC 69945-602-20) at time of calibration. Each gelatin capsule contains sucrose as a filler. The capsules are packaged in plastic vials containing one capsule of a single strength per vial. The plastic vial is packaged in a lead shield. A package insert is supplied with each lead shield.
BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic bleb is a rare complication of glaucoma filtration surgery characterized by an elevated bleb extended through the nasal 180 degrees of the eye and usually with a normal IOP. Currently, there is little experience and no existing standardized treatment. We describe a new method called modified superior bleb needling and evaluate the clinical outcomes in affected eyes.
METHODS: In this retrospective, consecutive interventional case series, patients who developed hypertrophic blebs after trabeculectomy from November 2015 to August 2020 at West China Hospital were enrolled. We innovatively adopted a modified superior bleb needling to allow aqueous humor to outflow into the superior subconjunctival space. Repeat needlings were performed if necessary. The technical and clinical success rate and complications were reported.
RESULTS: At the time of the last follow-up, complete success was achieved in 8/10 patients, qualified success was achieved in 9/10 patients, and failure was achieved in 1/10 patients. Eight patients had a low filtering bleb and IOP ≤21 mmHg. There was no statistically significant difference between the preneedling and postneedling IOP (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Modified superior bleb needling is effective for hypertrophic blebs after trabeculectomy, and there was no significant impact on anterior chamber depth or IOP, making it a viable or preferred alternative option. It is worthy of further study and wider usage.
TMC435 is being investigated for treatment of chronic HCV infection, in combination with Peg-IFN (pegylated interferon) and RBV (ribavirin). About 30% of all HIV infected patients are co-infected with HCV and need treatment for both infections. The results of this study will provide dosing recommendations for coadministration of TMC435 and TMC278 or Tenofovir in HCV-HCV co-infected patients. This is a Phase I, open-label (both participant and investigator know the name of the medication given at certain moment), randomized (sequence of treatment with study medications is assigned by chance), crossover trial in 48 healthy participants to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between TMC435 and an antiretroviral agent (TMC278 or tenofovir), at steady state. The participants are being allocated to one of two panels. In Panel 1, participants will receive three treatments (treatment A-B-C) in a randomized order. Participants will receive TMC435 150 mg q.d., TMC278 25 mg q.d.and TMC278 25 mg q.d. + TMC435 150 mg q.d., respectively. All treatments will be administered for 11 days and with food. There will be a washout period (a period where no study drug will be taken in view of having all the medication eliminated from the body before starting a new treatment) of at least 14 days between last intake of study medication in one session and first intake of study medication in the subsequent session. In Panel 2, participants will receive three treatments (treatment D-E-F) in a randomized order. Participants will receive TMC435 150 mg q.d., TDF 300 mg q.d. and TDF 300 mg q.d. + TMC435 150 mg q.d., respectively. All treatments will be administered for 7 days and with food. There will be a washout period of at least 7 days. Pharmacokinetic profiles of all three compounds will be determined through blood samples taken at regular intervals during the study. Safety and tolerability will be assessed during the study period and in follow-up. Blood and urine samples, electrocardiogram (ECG) and vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) will be taken at screening, before medication intake on days 1 and 11 and on Day 12 in each session of Panel 1, before medication intake on days 1 and 7 and on Day 8 in each session of Panel 2, 5 hours post dose on Day11 and Day 7 in Panel 1 and 2, respectively and at the 2 follow up visits at 1 week and 4-5 weeks after last dose of study medication in the last session. A physical examination will be performed at screening, on day -1 (= day before first medication intake in each session for both panels) and during the 2 follow up visits. Each volunteer will receive 3 treatments for 11 or 7 days (Panel 1 and 2, respectively), minimum 14 or 7 days apart from each other (Panel 1 and 2, respectively). Volunteers in Panel 1 will take oral TMC435 150 mg q.d., oral TMC278 25 mg q.d. and combined. Volunteers in Panel 2 will take oral TMC435 150 mg q.d., oral TDF 300 mg q.d. and combined.
A method and kit for screening a sample of body fluid for at least one autoantibody to at least one antigen. A source of at least one antigen to the autoantibody is provided. A substrate having immobilized thereto at least one antibody to the antigen is also provided. The antigen source is contacted with the sample of body fluid, so as to obtain a mixture wherein the antigen is allowed to substantially bind with the autoantibody, when the latter is present in the sample of body fluid. The mixture is allowed to flow relative to the substrate so as to allow the mixture to contact the antibody immobilized to the substrate. Labeling means are provided to permit monitoring of binding of the autoanitbody and the antigen present in the mixture, so as to provide an indication of the presence of the autoanitbody in the sample of body fluid.
OBJECTIVES: I. Establish the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and recommended Phase II doses (RPTDs) of vinorelbine and paclitaxel when combined with a fixed dose of estramustine in patients with advanced cancers or metastatic prostate cancer. II. Determine the toxicity pattern of this regimen at the MTDs and at the RPTDs in these patients. III. Make preliminary observations of antitumor activity in these patients treated with this regimen as leads for the Phase II portion of this study. IV. Establish the efficacy of the RPTDs of vinorelbine and paclitaxel when combined with estramustine in patients with prostate cancer who fulfill the criteria for the Phase II portion of this study.

OUTLINE: This is a dose escalation, multicenter study of vinorelbine and paclitaxel. Patients receive oral estramustine every 8 hours on days 0-2 and 7-9 and vinorelbine IV over 6-10 minutes immediately followed by paclitaxel IV over 1 hour on days 2 and 9. Courses repeat every 21 days. Patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease continue treatment indefinitely in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses of vinorelbine and paclitaxel until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each drug is determined. The MTD is defined as the lowest dose at which 2 or more of 3-6 patients experience dose limiting toxicity. The recommended Phase II dose of vinorelbine or paclitaxel is defined as the dose immediately preceding the MTD.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A minimum of 12-16 patients will be accrued over 1 year for Phase I of the study and a total of 14-25 patients will be accrued for Phase II of the study.
BACKGROUND: Both memory clinic professionals and patients see value in digital tools, yet these hardly find their way to clinical practice. We explored the usability of a digital tool to support the diagnostic work-up in daily memory clinic practice. We evaluated four modules that integrate multi-modal patient data (1.cognitive test; cCOG, and 2. MRI quantification; cMRI) into useful diagnostic information for clinicians (3. cDSI) and understandable and personalized information for patients (4. patient report).
METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in five Dutch memory clinics. Fourteen clinicians (11 geriatric specialists/residents, two neurologists, one nurse practitioner) were invited to integrate the tool into routine care with 43 new memory clinic patients. We evaluated usability and user experiences through quantitative data from questionnaires (patients, care partners, clinicians), enriched with thematically analyzed qualitative data from interviews (clinicians).
RESULTS: We observed wide variation in tool use among clinicians. Our core findings were that clinicians: 1) were mainly positive about the patient report, since it contributes to patient-centered and personalized communication. This was endorsed by patients and care partners, who indicated that the patient report was useful and understandable and helped them to better understand their diagnosis, 2) considered the tool acceptable in addition to their own clinical competence, 3) indicated that the usefulness of the tool depended on the patient population and purpose of the diagnostic process, 4) addressed facilitators (ease of use, practice makes perfect) and barriers (high workload, lack of experience, data unavailability).
CONCLUSION: This multicenter usability study revealed a willingness to adopt a digital tool to support the diagnostic process in memory clinics. Clinicians, patients, and care partners appreciated the personalized diagnostic report. More attention to education and training of clinicians is needed to utilize the full functionality of the tool and foster implementation in actual daily practice. These findings provide an important step towards a lasting adoption of digital tools in memory clinic practice.
Severe hepatotoxicity, including drug-induced liver injury, occurred in patients treated with ALECENSA.

In the pooled safety population [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)] of patients who received ALECENSA, hepatotoxicity occurred in 41% of patients and the incidence of Grade ≥ 3 hepatotoxicity was 8%. In the ALINA study, hepatotoxicity occurred in 61% of patients treated with ALECENSA and the incidence of Grade ≥ 3 hepatotoxicity was 4.7%. The majority (72% of 136 patients) of elevated transaminases occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. Treatment discontinuation due to hepatotoxicity occurred in 3.6% of patients who received ALECENSA in the pooled safety population and 1.6% of patients treated in the ALINA study.

In the pooled safety population, concurrent elevations in ALT or AST greater than or equal to 3 times the ULN and total bilirubin greater than or equal to 2 times the ULN, with normal alkaline phosphatase, occurred in less than 1% of patients treated with ALECENSA. Three patients with Grades 3–4 AST/ALT elevations had drug-induced liver injury (documented by liver biopsy in two cases).

Monitor liver function tests including ALT, AST, and total bilirubin every 2 weeks during the first 3 months of treatment, then once a month and as clinically indicated, with more frequent testing in patients who develop transaminase and bilirubin elevations. Based on the severity of the adverse drug reaction, withhold ALECENSA and resume at a reduced dose or permanently discontinue ALECENSA as described in Table 3  [see Dosage and Administration (2.4)].
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenously over 60 minutes on cycle 1 day 1 repeated every 21 days. Thalidomide 200 mg by mouth daily throughout the cycle. Prednisone 10 mg by mouth daily throughout the cycle. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 every 21 days.
PCT No. PCT/SE98/00922 Sec. 371 Date Jun. 8, 1998 Sec. 102(e) Date Jun. 8, 1998 PCT Filed May 18, 1998 PCT Pub. No. WO98/53803 PCT Pub. Date Dec. 3, 1998An enteric coated oral pharmaceutical formulation comprising as active ingredient a compound selected from the group of omeprazole, an alkaline salt of omeprazole, the (-)-enantiomer of omeprazole and an alkaline salt of the (-)-enantiomer of omeprazole, wherein the formulation comprises a core material of the active ingredient and optionally an alkaline reacting compound, the active ingredient is in admixture with a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, such as for instance a binding agent, and on said core material a separating layer and an enteric coating layer. A hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) of low viscosity with a specific cloud point is used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical formulations. Furthermore, the application describes the processes for their preparation and the use of the claimed formualtions in medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of different treatment strategies for the internal iliac artery (IIA) during EVAR.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study. All patients undergoing EVAR, who required treatment of at least one side of IIA from January 2013 to July 2022 in a single center, were included. According to the different treatment strategies for IIA, the patients were divided into UP (unilateral preservation), BP (bilateral preservation) and BE (bilateral embolization) groups. The primary outcomes included buttock claudication, bowel ischemia and iliac-related reintervention. Then patients who underwent IIA reconstruction were divided into IPG (iliac parallel stent graft) and IBG (iliac branch stent graft) groups according to the reconstruction technique. The primary outcomes included endoleak, iliac branch occlusion and iliac-related reintervention.
RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were included, including 167 in the UP group, 9 in the BP group and 61 in the BE group. The mean follow-up time was 39.0 ± 27.7, 50.0 ± 22.1 and 25.8 ± 18.9 months in UP, BP and BE groups, respectively. Thirty cases (12.7%) of buttock claudication occurred, and it was significantly higher in the BE group than the UP group (26.2% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the other follow-up outcomes among three groups. The K-M analysis indicated that the patients in the BE group had a lower survival rate than those in the other two groups (p = 0.024). 24 patients underwent IIA reconstruction, including 8 in the IPG group and 16 in the IBG group. The endoleak in the IBG group was significantly lower than that in the IPG group (0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.041). The iliac-related reintervention, iliac occlusion and mortality were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Overall it is beneficial for patients to preserve at least one side of IIA during EVAR as much as possible. Compared with IPG, IBG might be more applicable for IIA reconstruction.
The method for correcting the hormonal disorders after hysterectomy in the patients with the benign dyshormonal diseases of breasts provides for postoperative course of the substitution hormonal therapy on the third postoperative day. The substitution hormonal therapy is performed in three conditional cycles, 28 days each using the drug based on Tibolon per os at a daily dose of 2.5 mg and the transdermal 1% gestagenic gel applied to each breast once a day at a dose of 2.5 g. In addition, intravenous dropwise infusion of Pentoxiphylline is provided for the first three postoperative days for 90-180 minutes. The dose of drug (100 mg) is dissolved in 250 ml of 0.9% aqueous solution of sodium chloride. Later, the tablets of the drugs ate taken at a dose of 100 mg thrice a day after the meals for 30 days. On the fourth postoperative day, Escin is prescribed at a dose of 40 mg thrice a day for 10 days followed by 20 mg thrice a day for 20 days. The extract of Gingco biloba is used for 30 days at a dose of 40 mg thrice a day for 30 days.
Treatment with one stick pack of the multi-strain synbiotic (Vivatlac® Baby, Vivatrex GmbH, Rees, Germany) per day for four weeks. Each stick pack of Vivatlac® Baby contains a total of 10\^9 colony forming units (CFU) with equal CFU amounts of the following probiotic bacteria: L. acidophilus LA-14, L. casei R0215; L. paracasei Lpc-3; L. plantarum Lp-115; L. rhamnosus GG, L. salivarius Ls-33, B. lactis Bl-04, B. bifidum R0071, B. longum R0175 and 1.43 g of the prebiotic fructooligosaccharides.