Two randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled clinical trials, Trial 1071 (NCT04594213) and Trial 1070 (NCT04622254), were conducted to evaluate XEOMIN for use in the simultaneous intramuscular treatment of upper facial lines (GL, HFL, and LCL). Each trial included an extension period with two additional open-label treatment cycles. In these two trials a total of 730 adult subjects with GL, HFL, and LCL of at least moderate severity at maximum frown as assessed by the investigator and subject were randomized and treated.

In Trial 1071, a total of 362 subjects were randomized and treated. Of the randomized subjects, 179 subjects were treated with XEOMIN in all three treatment areas (receiving 64 U in total: 20 in GL, 20 U in HFL, 24 U in LCL area), 92 subjects were treated with XEOMIN in the GL and HFL areas (receiving 20 U in the GL area and 20 U in HFL area), and 91 subjects were treated with placebo (receiving equal volume of placebo).

In Trial 1070, a total of 368 subjects were randomized and treated. Of the randomized subjects, 184 subjects were treated with XEOMIN in all three treatment area (receiving 64 U in total: 20 in GL, 20 U in HFL, 24 U in LCL area), 90 subjects were treated with XEOMIN in the LCL area (receiving 24 U in LCL area, 12 U per side), and 94 subjects were treated with placebo (receiving equal volume of placebo).

The mean age of the 730 treated and randomized subjects was 46.5 years. The majority of subjects were female (84%) and White (92%). Fifteen percent (15%) of subjects identified as Hispanic or Latino.

For both trials, the severity of upper facial lines (GL, HFL, and LCL) was assessed at maximum contraction using the 5-point photonumerical Merz Aesthetic Scales (MAS; 0=none, 1= mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe). The MAS assessment was performed independently by both investigators and subjects. The primary timepoint was Day 30 following the first treatment.

For each upper facial area (GL, HFL, or LCL), treatment success was defined as a score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) and at least two-grade improvement from baseline to Day 30 as rated on the corresponding scale for GL, HFL, and LCL at maximum contraction as assessed by both the investigator and the subject. The percentage of subjects with treatment success in each treatment area is presented in Table 25.

Glabellar Lines

Two identically designed randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo controlled clinical trials (Studies GL-1 and GL-2) were conducted to evaluate XEOMIN for use in the temporary improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines. The trials enrolled 547 healthy adult patients with glabellar lines of at least moderate severity at maximum frown. Three hundred sixty six (366) subjects were treated with 20 Units of XEOMIN and 181 subjects received placebo. Subjects were excluded if they had marked ptosis, deep dermal scarring, or an inability to lessen glabellar lines, even by physically spreading them apart. The mean age of trial subjects was 46 years. The majority of subjects were female (86% and 93% in Studies GL-1 and GL-2, respectively), and predominantly White (89% and 65% respectively). The trial subjects received either 20 Units of XEOMIN or an equal amount of placebo. The total dose was delivered in 5 equally divided intramuscular injections of 4 Units each to specific sites (see Figure 7). Subjects were followed up for 120 days.

Investigators and subjects assessed efficacy at maximum frown on Day 30 of treatment using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Composite treatment success was defined as a 2-grade improvement on this scale compared to baseline for both the investigator's and subject's assessments on Day 30. The percentage of subjects with treatment success was greater on the XEOMIN arm than the placebo arm at Day 30 in both trials (see Table 26).