Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the largest number of cancer deaths annually, worldwide. (Ferlay et al, 2007) Of these, about 30% are early stage patients (stage I and II). For this group of patients, radical surgery with mediastinal lymph node dissection has been the mainstay of therapy with a reasonable curative option. However, 5-year survival rates for patients with pathologically staged IA-IIB disease are ranging from 67% to 39%. (Mountain et al, 1997) Following surgery, distant recurrence is the most common form of relapse and eventual cause of death. Assuming that these recurrences are due to occult micrometastases at the time of surgery, trials on adjuvant systemic therapy have been performed in an attempt to reduce the risk of recurrence and to improve survival.

In some of the recently published trials a clear benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC could not be achieved. (Tada et al, 2004; Scagliott et al, 2003; Waller et al, 2004) In marked contrast to these studies, three recent, big randomized trials on early stage NSCLC patients with modern platin-based two-drug chemotherapy-regimens revealed a significant advantage for overall or relapse free survival for chemotherapeutically treated patients. (Arriagada et al, 2004; Winton et al, 2005; Douillard et al, 2006) The majority of patients in the adjuvant treatment setting received a combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine. A pooled analysis of five big randomized studies demonstrated that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with NSCLC (overall HR of death 0.89, P=0.005) corresponding to a 5-year absolute benefit of 5.4% from chemotherapy. (Pignon et al, 2008) However, toxicity and inadequate dose delivery have been critical issues in all trials performed so far. Grade 3/4 toxicities are observed up to 73% with rates of neutropenic fever up to 7%. Up to 77% of the patients had at least one dose reduction or omission and 55% required one dose delay or more, most related to neutropenia. (Pisters et al, 2005; Winton et al, 2005)

There are few data in the literature about how soon after surgery a patient begins adjuvant chemotherapy, although most trials seem to start after a post-surgical interval of 4-6 weeks. A recent study reported that 26 patients, who underwent thoracoscopic (video-assisted thoracic surgery, VATS) lobectomy, receiving chemotherapy, 73% completed a full course on schedule and 85% received all intended cycles. (Nicastri et al, 2008) In another study, complete resection was performed by thoracotomy in 43 patients and by thoracoscopy in 57 patients, compared with thoracotomy, patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy had significantly fewer delayed (18% versus 58%, P \< 0.001) and reduced (26% versus 49%, P = 0.02) chemotherapy doses. A higher percentage of patients undergoing thoracoscopic resection received 75% or more of their planned adjuvant regimen without delayed or reduced doses (61% versus 40%, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in time to initiation of chemotherapy or toxicity. (Peterson et al, 2007) In comparison, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 9633 reported that 57% of patients received full-dose chemotherapy (Strauss et al, 2008) and the Intergroup JBR.10 trial reported that 55% of patients had at least 1 dose delay. (Winton et al, 2005) Approximately 34% of patients in the Adjuvant Lung Project Italy series chemotherapy wing received all scheduled doses without adjustment or delay; 69% completed their treatments with or without adjustments or delay.(Scagliotti et al, 2003) It is conceivable that patients who undergo VATS may have a quicker recovery and in general more strength to tolerate chemotherapy. There are theoretic survival benefits to starting chemotherapy immediately after surgery because the body's tumor burden should be lowest, and tumor growth fastest, at this time. Thus, chemotherapy administered immediately post-surgery would be most effective, assuming that wound healing is adequate. (Nicastri et al, 2008)

Pemetrexed, a multi-target folate antimetabolite, shows clear activity in non-small cell lung cancer. In a phase III study for patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer, the efficacy of single-agent pemetrexed, as determined by overall survival, was similar to that of docetaxel. (Hanna et al, 2004) The combination of oxaliplatin and pemetrexed has been of particular interest because it has demonstrated both good efficacy and a tolerable side effect profile. Oxaliplatin is a diaminocyclohexane-containing platinum compound that inhibits DNA replication and transcription by forming DNA adducts. Its mechanism of action is similar to that of the classic platinum drugs, but molecular pharmacology studies suggest that oxaliplatin represents a distinct family of platinum compounds. It has a different cytotoxicity profile from cisplatin and can be safely given in the outpatient setting without hydration therapy. (Raymond et al, 1998) Moreover, oxaliplatin appears to interact synergistically with pemetrexed. (Raymond et al, 2002) Phase I studies evaluated pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin in patients with solid tumors, and showed the regimen was efficacious and well tolerated. (Misset et al, 2004) The combination of oxaliplatin and pemetrexed was compared with carboplatin and pemetrexed as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC in a randomized phase II study. Response rates were 27 and 33%, respectively, and not statistically different. However, toxicity in the oxaliplatin/pemetrexed arm was quite low, this doublet can be delivered easily and is well tolerated. Furthermore, it results in a 7.3% rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia only and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 2.4%. Dose reductions occur only in 2.6% cycles. Patients received 95.3% and 100% of the planned weekly mean doses of pemetrexed and oxaliplatin, respectively. (Scagliotti et al, 2005)

Therefore, it seems reasonable to test a less toxic regimen also in early stages after complete (R0) resection of the tumor, where reduced toxicities might improve the feasibility of drug delivery, compliance and the convenience of treatment for the patient and hence perhaps improve survival. The main purpose of this phase II trial is to evaluate the clinical feasibility-in terms of patients without dose limiting toxicities or premature treatment withdrawal or death-of administering adjuvant chemotherapy of pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed/oxaliplatin immediately post-VATS in patients with completely resected NSCLC.