PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess intelligence, visual perception and working memory in children with new-onset Rolandic epilepsy (RE) and children with Rolandic discharges without seizures (RD).
METHODS: The participants in the study were 12 children with RE and 26 children with RD aged 4 to 10 years (all without medication and shortly after diagnosis) and 31 healthy controls. Their cognitive performance was assessed using the German versions of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV), the Developmental Test of Visual Perception-2 (DTVP-2), the Developmental Test of Visual Perception-Adolescent and Adult (DTVP-A) (each according to age) and the Word Order, Hand Movements and Spatial Memory subtests of the German version of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC).
RESULTS: The comparison of the entire group of children with RE/RD and the control group conducted in the first step of our analysis revealed a weaker performance of the children with RE/RD in all cognitive domains. Significant deficits, however, were found exclusively in the RD group. Compared to the controls, they performed significantly weaker regarding IQ (full scale IQ: p < 0.001; verbal IQ: p < 0.001; performance IQ: p = 0.002; processing speed: p = 0.005), visual perception (general visual perception: p = 0.005; visual-motor integration: p = 0.002) and working memory (WISC working memory: p = 0.002 and K-ABC Word Order (p = 0.010) and Hand Movements (p = 0.001) subtests. Also, the children without seizures scored significantly lower than those with seizures on the WISC Working Memory Index (p = 0.010) and on the K-ABC Word Order (p = 0.021) and Hand Movements (p = 0.027) subtests. Further analysis of our data demonstrated the particular importance of the family context for child development. Significant cognitive deficits were found only in children with RD from parents with lower educational levels. This group consistently scored lower compared to the control group regarding IQ (full scale IQ: p < 0.001; verbal IQ: p < 0.001; performance IQ: p = 0.012; processing speed: p = 0.034), visual perception (general visual perception: p = 0.018; visual-motor integration: p = 0.010) and auditory working memory (WISC working memory: p = 0.014). Furthermore, compared to the children with RE, they performed significantly weaker on verbal IQ (p = 0.020), auditory working memory consistently (WISC working memory: p = 0.027; K-ABC: Word Order: p = 0.046) as well as in one of the K-ABC spatial working memory subtests (Hand Movements: p = 0.029). Although we did not find significant deficits in children with new-onset RE compared to healthy controls, the performance of this group tended to be weaker more often. No statistically significant associations were observed between selected clinical markers (focus types: centrotemporal/other foci/laterality of foci and spread of Rolandic discharges) and cognitive test results. Except for spatial working memory, we also found no evidence that the age of our patients at the time of study participation was of significant importance to their cognitive performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides some evidence that children with Rolandic discharges, with and without seizures, may be at higher risk of cognitive impairment. In addition to medical care, we emphasise early differentiated psychosocial diagnostics to provide these children and their families with targeted support if developmental problems are present.