Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) of unknown etiology characterized by diffuse mucosal inflammation limited to the colon. The basis of medical treatment is with agents that reduce the inflammatory process. Tailoring appropriate therapy will depend on disease severity, which can be difficult to identify. A response to therapy may also require months to determine. Medications for induction of remission and/or for maintenance in patients with mild to severe UC include 5-aminosalicylates (5'ASA), corticosteroids, azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine, and infliximab (IFX). All medications have their own inherent side effect profile. Cost can be a major issue with some medications such as IFX, which can be tens of thousands of dollars annually. Medical management can still fail in those with severe disease necessitating surgical management with a colectomy. Identification of high-risk patients who are candidates for more intensive therapy early in the disease course might be a strategy to improve treatment outcomes and limit cost.

This notion of "individualizing" therapy is attractive and a distinct departure from the current "step-care" paradigm in which treatments are added sequentially on the basis of symptom-defined treatment failure. However, for this paradigm to be implementable an objective means of accurately stratifying risk must be identified and validated. Accordingly, increased interest has evolved in the use of biomarkers as prognostic tools. Although fecal calprotectin and serum CRP are potential candidates for this role, these tests have limitations.

Transabdominal ultrasound (US) has been used in the diagnostic workup of IBD. US was a good surrogate of disease activity when compared to colonoscopy, but is unable to reliably assess the rectal wall which tends to cause the most symptoms in UC. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a highly accurate diagnostic modality for the assessment of rectal pathology. However, the role of EUS in IBD is not well defined. Tsuga et al showed total wall thickness to be highly predictive for acute inflammation in patients with UC compared to healthy controls and that the degree of rectal wall involvement correlated with endoscopic severity. Higaki et al showed patients with quiescent UC who relapsed had initial sonographic evidence of "deep" disease activity shown by significantly greater baseline thickness of the first 3 layers of the rectal wall. Yoshizawa et al subsequently demonstrated that inflammation reaching the muscularis propria or deeper predicted the need for colectomy. Hurlstone et al correlated EUS scores with histopathology, endoscopic, and clinical scores and found good concordance to only exist with superficial EUS scores. In all of these studies the investigators who performed the EUS analysis did so with knowledge of the endoscopy scores. This questions the validity of these results due to the potential for bias. Another parameter that shows promise for evaluation of inflammatory burden is EUS evaluation of blood flow. Surprisingly, Doppler flow has not been used to assess bowel wall vascularity in UC with EUS. We believe that assessment of vascularity has the potential to differentiate with a high degree of accuracy active from quiescent disease.

Although the existing literature indicates that EUS has potential as an evaluative and prognostic tool the investigators believe that a great deal of additional research is needed to further develop this technology. This study will correlate Doppler EUS and other EUS indices with validated clinical, endoscopic, and histological indices of UC inflammation to assess its utility as a diagnostic tool. It will assess the reproducibility of these indices by calculating inter and intra-observer agreement by blinded expert reviewers. This information may have prognostic importance and might ultimately be used to guide therapy in individual patients.