According to the National Health Survey in 2010, more than 50% of adults between 60-69 years old in Singapore had hypertension. As the population ages and life expectancy continues to increase, an increasing incidence of hypertensive heart disease would be expected. Similar to aortic stenosis, left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome, independent of traditional risk factors including peripheral blood pressure. Unlike aortic stenosis (a condition with fixed obstruction), arterial hypertension is dynamic and with effective medical therapy, left ventricular hypertrophy can regress and outcome will improve. As such, contemporary guidelines recommend more aggressive blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. However, the correlation between arterial pressure and left ventricular mass is weak, particularly in treated individuals. Coupled with the inherent limitations of measuring peripheral blood pressure, it is clear that using arterial pressure to monitor progression or assess treatment response in patients with hypertensive heart disease is not optimal.

Without timely and appropriate therapies, left ventricular hypertrophy will become progressively maladaptive and ultimately the heart fails. Whilst heart failure is more commonly known by the signs and symptoms related to impaired systolic ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is an increasingly recognized complex entity characterized by signs and symptoms of heart failure in the presence of preserved ejection fraction. To date, therapies that improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have not shown similar benefits in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. There is no single explanation for these negative findings, but one potential reason may relate to the heterogeneity of patients recruited into these trials, and thus supporting a more targeted approach to specific phenotypes rather than a standard treatment strategy for all patients.

Therefore, a focus on the transition from compensatory left ventricular hypertrophy to ventricular decompensation is crucial not only in furthering our understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertensive heart disease, but also instrumental in designing future trials. Small studies had reported replacement myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertension. But these studies were small and unable to establish determinants associated with myocardial fibrosis. Unlike the increasing evidence of myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis, the prognosis associated with myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertension is currently not known. Although there is promising data suggesting regression in myocardial fibrosis with certain antihypertensive therapies, the effects of myocardial fibrosis regression on long-term outcome is not known. As discussed earlier, other than relying on peripheral blood pressure, there are no biomarkers to monitor response of antihypertensive therapy on regression of left ventricular mass and myocardial fibrosis.

Our investigators would establish a paradigm to demonstrate the significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease; and examine other biomarkers associated with myocardial fibrosis and myocyte death that have high potential of translating into clinical application to monitor treatment response. Subsequently, the prognosis associated with myocardial fibrosis will be examined in future follow-up studies. In parallel, we will also study the effects of novel agents on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis, as well as, long-term clinical outcomes in future studies.