TAX COURT OPINION

Case: Daniel Pierce
Docket Number: 13737-06
Judge: Swift
Opinion Type: memo
Filed: 04/22/2008
Pages: 4

T .C . Memo . 2008-10 9 UNITED STATES TAX COUR T DANIEL PIERCE, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Responden t Docket No . 13737-06 . Filed April 22, 2008 . Daniel Pierce, pro se . Jeffrey S . Luechtefeld and Melinda G . Williams , for respondent . MEMORANDUM OPINIO N SWIFT, Judge : This matter is before us on respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings . ' 1 All section references are to thee Internal Revenue Code applicable to the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . SERVED APR 2' 2 2008 - 2 - Backgroun d Petitioner did not file Federal income tax returns for 2001, 2002, 2003, or 2004 . Under section 6020(b) and on the basis of information provided to respondent by third parties relating to payments made to petitioner, respondent prepared substitute tax returns for petitioner and determined against petitioner the tax deficiencies and additions to tax set forth below . Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 Deficiency $21,424 21,129 12,687 12,904 Additions to Ta x Sec . Sec . 6651(a)(1) 6651(a)(2) Sec . 6651(f) $4,820 4,754 2,855 2,903 $70 6 33 2 37 5 Sec . 665 4 $85 6 1 To be calculated in accordance with sec . 6651 . Respondent also determined against petitioner a self- employment tax liability on the basis of payments petitioner received for work as a janitor . On July 17, 2006, in response to respondent ' s notice of deficiency , petitioner filed a petition containing only tax- protester arguments . By court order of November 1, 2006, petitioner ' s tax - protester arguments were stricken from the petition . - 3 - Discussio n After the above November 1, 2006, Court order, the only viable remaining issue before the Court is : respondent's determination of the section 6651(f) addition to tax for fraudulent failure to file tax returns, and with the filing o f the instant motion for judgment on the pleadings, respondent concedes for each year the section 6651(f) addition to tax for fraud . However, in opposing respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings and at a hearing that was held on February 13, 2008, in Tampa, Florida, petitioner again raises only tax-proteste r arguments . We may grant judgment on the pleadings where the pleadings do not raise genuine issues of material fact or law . Rule 120(a) ; Nis Family Trust v . Commissioner , 115 T .C . 523, 537 (2000) ; Karkabe v . Commissioner , T .C . Memo . 2007-115 . Petitioner raises only tax-protester arguments, each of which has been stricken, and respondent now concedes for each year the addition to tax for fraud . For the reasons stated, we shall grant respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the tax deficiency for each year, and the tax deficiency sustained for each year satisfies respondent's burden of production under section 7491(c) with regard to the section 6651(a)(1) and (2) additions to tax and the 4 - section 6654 addition to tax . Respondent's determination of additional self-employment taxes due on payments petitioner received for janitorial work also is sustained . Sec . 1401 . To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered .