IMMUNOPROTECTIVE RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN FROM ANAPLASMA MARGINALE, VACCINE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE

Abstract: Vaccines and methods useful to induce an immune response which is protective to reduce the severity or prevent infection by ehrlichial parasites of the species <i>Anaplasma marginale</i> utilizing recombinant MSP1a surface protein antigens alone or in combination with tick cell culture derived <i>A. marginale</i>.

Description: IMMUNOPROTECTIVE RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN FROM ANAPLASMA MARGINALE, VACCINE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Technical Field: The present invention relates to antigenic polypeptides and proteins, related vaccines and methods useful to induce an immune response which is protective to reduce the severity or prevent infection by ehrlichial parasites of the species Anaplasma marginale. Background: Anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease of cattle caused by the obligate intraerythrocytic ehrlichial pathogen A. marginale. The acute phase of the disease is characterized by severe anemia, weight loss, fever, abortion, lower milk production and often death. The only known site of development of A. marginale in cattle is within bovine erythrocytes. The number of infected erythrocytes increases logarithmically and removal of these infected cells by phagocytosis results in development of anemia and icterus without hemoglobinemia and hemogloinuria. Biological transmission of A. marginale is effected by feeding ticks, while mechanical transmission occurs when infected blood is transferred to susceptible animals by biting flies or by blood- contaminated fomites. Cattle that recover from acute infection remain persistently infected and serve as reservoirs for mechanical transmission and infection of ticks. Approximately 20 species of ticks have been incriminated as vectors worldwide. The developmental cycle of A. marginale in ticks is complex and coordinated with the tick feeding cycle. After infection and development of A. marginale in tick gut cells, many other tick tissues become infected, including the salivary glands from where the ehrlichia is transmitted to vertebrates during feeding. MSPl is one of six major surface proteins (MSPs) that have been described on A. marginale from bovine erythrocytes and has been found to be conserved on tick salivary gland-derived A. marginale [1]. MSPl is a heterodimer composed of two structurally unrelated polypeptides: MSPla which is encoded by a single gene, mspla, and MSP lb which is encoded by at least two genes, msplβl and msplβl [2, 3]. MSPla is variable in molecular weight among geographic isolates because of a variable number of tandem 28 or 29 amino acid repeats in the amino terminal of the protein. Immunization of cattle with affmity-purified native MSPl complex has previously been shown to induce protective immunity in cattle that received homologous or heterologous challenge with A. marginale geographic isolates [4, 5]. In addition, MSPla and MSP lb expressed by recombinant Escherichia coli were shown to be putative adhesins to bovine erythrocytes [6, 7]. Although the MSPl complex has been suggested to be involved in erythrocyte invasion, its role in infection and multiplication of the parasite in the tick vector has not been reported. Recently, A. marginale has been grown in continuous culture in a cell line, IDE8, derived from embryos of the tick Ixodes scapularis [8]. See also U.S. Patent No. 5,869,335, incorporated herein by reference. The Virginia isolate of A. marginale was initially propagated in the IDE8 tick cell line but subsequently an Oklahoma isolate was propagated in the tick cell line and characterized [9]. Colonies of A. marginale in cultured tick cells were morphologically similar to those observed in ticks [8-10], and A. marginale harvested from cell culture were infective for both cattle and ticks. All 6 MSPs of A. marginale were found to be conserved on the cell culture-derived organisms and the antigenic composition remained the same after successive passage in cell culture. The A. marginale isolate antigenic identity, as determined by the molecular weight of the MSPla, was retained in culture [9, 11]. MSPl complex isolated A. marginale also has been utilized for the vaccination of ruminants, as disclosed by McGuire et al. in USPN 5,549,898 issued August 27, 1996 (said patent being incorporated herein by reference). Existing vaccines, however, including formulations using partially purified parasites from infected erythrocytes and cultured tick cells, are currently handicapped by mechanisms developed by the parasite to hide the most relevant epitopes from the host immune system. The inclusion of recombinant protein preparations in vaccine formulations would allow the development of host immune response against relevant epitopes not available for the host immune system in natural conformations present in whole-parasite or parasite-derived purified antigens. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Experimental results described by the inventors in copending U.S. provisional patent application Serial No. 60/244,333 demonstrate a differential role for MSPla and MSP lb polypeptides of the MSPl surface protein complex for adherence of A. marginale to bovine erythrocytes and tick cells. Recombinant MSPla expressed in E. coli was shown to be an adhesin for bovine erythrocytes and both native and cultured tick cells. In . contrast, recombinant E. coli expressing MSP lb adhered only to bovine erythrocytes and not to tick cells. The role of the MSPl complex, therefore, was determined to vary among vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. The present invention is based upon the surprising discovery that cattle immunized with the recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of the MSPl complex alone or in combination with tick cell culture-derived A. marginale are better protected against A. marginale infection as demonstrated by a lower reduction in packed cell volume (PCV) and lower peak parasitemia (PPE) than cattle immunized with the MSPl complex, a combination of uncomplexed MSPla and MSP lb surface protein antigens, the MSP lb antigen alone, cell culture derived A. marginale, or cell culture derived A. marginale combined with MSP lb. Indeed, only erythrocyte-derived A. marginale appears to confer like protection. Thus, in one embodiment of the present invention there is provided a vaccine composition for inducing an immune response in a ruminant, the vaccine composition comprising the recombinant MSPla purified surface protein antigen of A. marginale or subunits thereof, alone or in combination with other antigenic components, wherein the vaccine composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. In another embodiment of the present invention there is provided, a method for inducing an immune response in a ruminant to provide immune protection which reduces the severity of or prevents infection by A. marginale, the method comprising administering to said ruminant an effective amount of the inventive vaccine composition. A better understanding of the present invention, its several aspects, and its advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the attached figures, wherein there is described the preferred embodiment of the invention, simply by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a graphical illustration of the immune response against MSPla and MSP lb determined by Western blot analysis of sera derived from immunized cattle and controls generated in connection with the experimental results reported herein. FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of the reduction in PCV achieved by various combinations of antigens and controls in connection with the experimental results reported herein. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Before explaining the present invention in detail, it is important to understand that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the embodiments and steps described herein. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in a variety of ways. It is to be understood that the pliraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. In accordance with the present invention there is provided a new vaccine against the ehrlichial cattle pathogen A. marginale through the use of discrete recombinant MSPla and polypeptides derived from MSPla containing the immunoprotective and functional regions that are expressed in E.coli. In one aspect, only recombinant MSPla or immunoprotective and functional regions thereof are utilized as the antigenic component of the vaccine. In another aspect, recombinant MSPla or subunits thereof are utilized in combination with other antigen preparations, particularly antigen preparations derived from A. marginale-mfected cultured tick IDE8 cells. MSPla and MSP lb are isolated from A. marginale initial bodies as a complex of two noncovalently linked, antigenically distinct polypeptides. It is possible that the association between MSPla and MSP lb in the surface protein complex allows the parasite to more effectively bind to erythrocyte and/or tick cell components. MSPla could be the essential subunit in the recognition of the tick cell receptor, while the binding to the erythrocyte receptor could be mediated primarily by MSP lb or by both protein subunits through the binding of distinct erythrocyte components. Additionally, the association between MSPla and MSP lb could stabilize and/or properly conform the MSPl complex [6]. MSPla is encoded by a single monocystronic gene, mspl a, which is polymorphic among geographical isolates of A. marginale [12, 13, 15]. A. marginale isolates differ in the number of 28-29 amino acids tandem repeats within the MSPla polypeptide [13, 15], which contain a neutralization-sensitive epitope [4, 13]. However, the sequence of mspl a does not change during the multiplication of the parasite in the bovine host and the tick vector. The second MSPl subunit, MSP lb, is encoded by at least two monocystronic genes, msplβl and msplβ2 [3]. These loci are polymorphic between and within populations of A. marginale from different geographical regions and life cycle stages but conserve a high degree of similarity. Sequence diversity is mainly due to point mutations in variable regions, perhaps due to selective immune pressure. The genetic structure of mspl a and β genes together with the vital function of codified polypeptides permits the inclusion of recombinant MSPl polypeptides, or its functional domains, in vaccine formulations against v marginale. The experiments described and examples provided hereinafter demonstrate that cattle immunized with recombinant MSPla alone or in combination with tick cell culture derived A. marginale are unexpectedly better protected against A. marginale infection as demonstrated by a lower reduction in packed cell volume (PCV) and lower peak parasitemia (PPE) than cattle immunized with the MSPl complex, a combination of uncomplexed MSPla and MSP lb surface protein antigens, the MSP lb antigen alone, cell culture derived A. marginale, or cell culture derived A. marginale combined with MSP lb. Indeed, only erythrocyte-derived A. marginale appears to confer like protection. Example 1 Preparation of Recombinant E. coli Expressing MSPla and Preparation of Antigen The mspl a gens was cloned by PCR from the Oklahoma isolate of A. marginale derived from infected erythrocytes. DNA was extracted from 1 ml stored blood samples containing infected bovine erythrocytes collected during high parasitemia employing 250 μL Tri Reagent (Sigma) and following manufacturer's recommendations. Extracted DNA was resuspended in 100 μL water. The mspl gene was amplified from 1 μL DNA by PCR using 10 pmol of each primer MSPlaP: 5'GCATTACAACGCAACGCTTGAG3' and MSPla3: 5'GCTTTACGCCGCCGCCTGCGCC3' in a 50-μL volume PCR employing the Access RT-PCR system (Promega). Reactions were performed in an automated DNA thermal cycler (Eppendorf) for 35 cycles. After an initial denaturation step of 30 sec at 94°C, each cycle consisted of a denaturing step of 30 sec at 94°C and an annealing- extension step of 2.5 min at 68°C. The program ended by storing the reactions at 4°C. PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels to check the size of amplified fragments. The amplified fragments were resin purified from PCR reactions (Wizard Promega) and cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega) for sequencing both strands (Core Sequencing Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Noble Research Center, Oklahoma State University). For high level expression of MSPla, mspl a coding region was amplified from perl (mspl a in pGEM-T vector) plasmid DNA by PCR using the primers 5 ' CCGCTCGAGATGTTAGCGGAGTATGTGTCC3 ' and 5'GAAGATCTCGCCGCCGCCTGCGCC3'. The mspl amplification product was digested with Xhό and Bgllϊ and inserted into the cloning site of pFLAG-CTC expression vector (Sigma). Recombinant plasmid was named pFLCla. In this construct, the inserted gene is under the control of the inducible tac promoter and yield full-length MSPla polypeptide, with a C-terminal fusion of a FLAG marker octapeptide. The fidelity and orientation of the construct was verified by sequencing. For expression of MSPla recombinant polypeptides, pFLCla expression plasmid was transformed into E. coli K-12 (strain JM109). Transformed E. coli strains were inoculated in LB containing 50 μg/ml Ampicillin and 0.4% glucose. Cultures were grown at 37°C to OD 6 oo nm =0.4. IPTG was then added to 0.5 mM final concentration, and incubation continued during 4 h, for induction MSPla expression. Cells were collected by centrifugation and membranes extracted after sonication and centrifugation. MSP lb was cloned, expressed and purified in a similar way. Doses of 5 ml containing 100 μg recombinant antigens were used for vaccination in subsequent studies. Example 2 Analysis of the Protective Capacity of Vaccine Preparations Containing Recombinant MSPla 1. Propagation of Anaplasma marginale in tick cell culture and preparation of immunogen. The IDE8 (ATCC CRL 11973) tick cell line derived from embryos of Ixodes scapularis was maintained at 31° C in L-15B medium, pH 7.2, supplemented with 5% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma, USA), 10% tryptose phosphate broth (Difco, USA) and 0.1 % bovine lipoprotein concentrate (ICN, USA). Cultures were grown in 25-cm 2 plastic flasks (Nunc, Rosekilde, Denmark) with 5 ml of medium, and the medium was replaced weekly. The cells were subcultured at 1 :5 to 1 :20, and the cells became tightly adherent to the culture substrate and multiplied with a population doubling time of 3 to 5 days to a density of about 5 x 10 6 cells/ml. Nearly confluent monolayers from each passage were collected and stored in liquid nitrogen in medium with 10% DMSO. Tick cell cultures infected with the Oklahoma isolate of A. marginale were propagated. Terminal cell cultures were harvested, the cells centrifuged, and the contents of each T25 flask was resuspended in 1 ml PBS and stored at -70°C until used as antigen for immunogen doses. The antigen aliquots were thawed, pooled and a sample was taken and tested by indirect ELISA. The cell culture-derived antigen was inactivated with beta propiolactone (BPL) and the volume was adjusted to 5 ml so that each dose contained approximately 2 x 10 10 A. marginale. 2. Preparation of A. marginale antigen from bovine erythrocytes. Two susceptible, splenectomized calves (PA432 and PA433) were each inoculated with 2.5 ml blood stabilate (40% parasitemia) collected from a calf with the Virginia isolate of A. marginale. The calves were monitored for infection by examination of stained blood smears. Blood was collected from PA432 at parasitemias of 13.6% and 32.7% and from PA433 at parasitemias of 12,2% and 12.9%. After each collection, the erythrocytes were washed 3 times in PBS, each time removing the buffy coat. The erythrocytes were frozen at -70°C 1:1 in RPMI cell culture medium until used as antigen for the immunization studies. The frozen erythrocyte antigen was thawed, washed in PBS, and centrifuged. The resulting pellet was washed to remove the hemoglobin, after which the antigen was pooled and inactivated with BPL. An aliquot was tested by ELISA as described previously for the erythrocyte antigen preparation using a known erythrocyte standard. Doses (5 ml) were prepared that contained approximately 2 x 10 10 A. marginale. 3. Experimental design. Fifty, 16-month month old Angus cattle were randomly assigned into ten groups of five cattle each that were immunized with various antigens as follows. (1) MSPl complex, (2) MSPla and MSPlb, (3) MSPla, (4) MSP lb, (5) cell culture-derived A. marginale, (6) cell culture-derived A. marginale and MSPla, (7) cell culture-derived A. marginale and MSPlb, (8) erythrocyte-derived A. marginale, (9) uninfected IDE8 tick cells and (10) adjuvant only. 4. Immunizations. All cattle were immunized 3 times by subcutaneous injection of the antigen at weeks 1, 4 and 6. Each antigen dose was 5 ml in volume and contained an antigen in the adjuvant, Xtend® III (Grand Laboratories, Larchwood, IA). All cattle were challenge-exposed 10 weeks after the last immunization with 1 x 10 7 A. marginale infected erythrocytes collected from a calf experimentally infected with the Oklahoma isolate of A. marginale. Blood of the immunized and control cattle was monitored for infection with A. marginale by microscopic examination of blood smears and hematology was done daily after the onset of infection. Parameters evaluated in cattle included determination of the peak percent infected erythrocytes (PPE), percent reduction in the packed cell volume (PCV), and the prepatent period (days) determined from the day of challenge-exposure to the onset of infection. 5. Collection of blood and serum samples. Whole blood was collected in vacutainer tubes containing EDTA and used for preparation of stained blood smears for light microscopy and for determination of the PCV. Serum samples were collected from each animal before immunization, weekly until the cattle were challenge-exposed and daily after cattle developed parasitemia as a result of challenge-exposure. Serum samples were stored at -70°C until tested by competitive ELISA and Western blots. 6. Characterization of the immune response in vaccinated cattle by competitive ELISA and Western blots. Antibody responses of all immunized and control cattle at two weeks after the last immunization to MSPla, MSPlb and MSP 5 were determined using ELISAs specific for detection of antibodies to each of these MSPs. Antibody responses of all immunized and control cattle at two weeks after the last immunization to MSPla and MSPlb were also analyzed by Western blot. One hundred micrograms of recombinant MSPla or MSPlb were loaded in an 8% polyacrylamide gel. SDS-PAGE gels were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 hr at room temperature. Sera from immunized cattle was diluted 1:200 in TBS. Serum from an uninfected bovine was included as a negative control. All sera were incubated with the membrane for 1 hr at room temperature using a Mini-Protean II Multi-screen (BioRad, USA). The membrane was washed 3 times with TBST and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with goat anti- rabbit IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate (KPL, USA) diluted 1:10,000. The membrane was washed again and the color developed using Sigma Fast BCIP/NBT alkaline phosphatase substrate tablets. The membrane was then examined for recognition of the bands corresponding to MSPla and MSPlb. 7. Statistical analysis. For the analysis of results from the immunization experiment, pairwise comparisons (Student's t test) were conducted to compare results between cattle immunized with antigen preparations and the controls. Parameters analyzed included the prepatent period (days), the peak percent parasitized erythrocytes (PPE) and the percent reduction in the packed cell volume (PCV). Mean antibody levels were compared using an ANOVA test. 8. Results. Antibody titers against MSPla, MSPlb and MSP5 in immunized cattle peaked two weeks after the last immunization. The immune response against MSPla, MSPlb and MSP5 was analyzed by Western blot. Cattle immunized with recombinant antigen preparations responded to recombinant proteins included on each preparation (Fig. 1). Cattle immunized with tick cell derived A. marginale antigens and with infected erythrocytes-derived antigens recognized primarily MSPlb or MSPla, respectively (Fig. 1). Protection was evaluated using the reduction in PCV, the PPE and the prepatent period. No differences were observed in the prepatent period. The PPE was reduced in cattle immunized with MSPla, MSPlb, the combination of recombinant antigens with infected tick cells-derived antigens and in animals immunized with infected erythrocytes-derived antigens as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Peak Parasitemia (%) Group Ave SD P MSPl 5.5 2.8 0.13 la+lb 6.0 1.6 0.14 la 4.8 0.6 0.03 lb 3.9 1.0 0.01 TC 4.1 2.3 0.03 la+TC 4.7 1.4 0.03 lb+TC 3.9 0.8 0.01 RBC 2.7 1.1 0.004 Saline 5.5 1.4 0.08 Cells 7.4 2.3 The reduction in PCV, associated with clinical signs, was significantly reduced in cattle immunized with MSPla combined with infected tick cell-derived antigens and in cattle immunized with erythrocyte-derived antigens (See Fig. 2, wherein Reduction PCV = [(Ave Start PCV-Lowest PCV)/Start PCV] x 100). The results of these experiments demonstrated that: a. Cattle immunized with infected tick cell-derived antigens had a preferential recognition for MSPlb while cattle immunized with erythrocyte-derived antigens showed a bias toward MSPla. The bias in the antibody response against MSPla or MSPlb in cattle immunized with A. marginale antigens from IDE8 tick cells or bovine erythrocytes suggests that the MSPl complex exposure on the surface of parasites may vary during multiplication on the tick and mammalian hosts; b. The immunization with the MSPl complex or with MSPla and MSPlb together did not protect cattle after challenge with A. marginale despite that cattle responded to both antigens; and c. Cattle with a predominant immune response against MSPla (groups immunized with MSPla, MSPla plus infected tick cell- derived antigens and infected erythrocyte-derived antigens) were protected against A. marginale infection as demonstrated by the lower reduction in PCV. It can thus be appreciated that the utilization of recombinant MSPla in vaccines provides an advantageous mechanism to achieve resistance in cattle against A. marginale infection. Whereas erythrocyte-derived A. marginale is disadvantaged due to cost, difficulties in purifying antigen from bovine membranes, problems with preventing pathogen contamination and difficulties in standardization, recombinant MSPla may be readily and cost effectively prepared in a standardized, pure form free of bovine erythrocyte membranes and antigens that might result in formation of an immune response to bovine blood cells. Example 3 Function of MSPla Tandem Repeats in Adhesion to Host Cell Receptors 1. Construction, expression in E. coli and characterization of wild type MSPla and mutants. A MSPla (Oklahoma isolate mspla clone perl [14]) mutant lacking the tandem repeats was constructed by PCR. Oligonucleotide primers RIOR (5'- CCGAATTCCATGTTAGCGGCTAATTGGCGGCAAGAGATGCG-3 ') and MSPla3BII (5'-CCAGATCTCTTTACGCCGCCGCCTGCGCC-3') were designed to amplify the mspla gene lacking 6 amino acids preceding the repeats and the tandem repeats in a 50 μl volume PCR (0.2 μM each primer, 1.5 mM MgSO 0.2 mM dNTP, IX AMN/Tfl reaction buffer, 5u Tfl DΝA polymerase) employing the Access RT-PCR system (Promega, USA). Reactions were performed in an automated DΝA thermal cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler® personal, USA) for 35 cycles. After an initial denaturation step of 30 sec at 94°C, each cycle consisted of a denaturing step of 30 sec at 94°C and an annealing-extension step of 2.5 min at 68°C. The program ended by storing the reactions at 4°C. The primers introduced an ATG initiation codon and Eco RI and Bgl II restriction sites for cloning into the pFLAG-CTC expression vector (Sigma). The resulting plasmid pAFORl was transformed into E. coli JM109 and induced for expression of mutant MSPla as previously reported for MSPla [14]. For the expression of MSPla (Oklahoma isolate mspla clone perl [14]) tandem repeats in E. coli, this region was amplified using oligonucleotide primers RNOKBS5 (5'- GAGATCTGCTGATGGCTCGTCAGCGGG-3') and RNOKBS3 (5'- GGTCGACCCTGATTGAGACGATGTACTGGCC-3'). The PCR was conducted as previously described but with amplification cycles consisting of a denaturing step of 30 sec at 94°C, an annealing step of 30 sec at 58°C and an extension step of 1 min at 68°C. The 5' and 3' amplification primers contained Bgl II and Sal I restriction sites, respectively, for cloning into pFLClb [14] for expression in E. coli as a fusion peptide to the COOH-terminus of MSPlb (locus βl, Oklahoma isolate). The resulting plasmid pFlbRNO4 was transformed into E. coli JM109 and induced for expression of mutant MSP lb>MSP la-repeats protein as previously reported for MSPlb [14]. All constructs were sequenced at the Core Sequencing Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Noble Research Center, Oklahoma State University using ABI Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing protocols developed by Applied Biosystems (Perkin-Εlmer Corp., Foster City, CA). Expression of recombinant mutant proteins was assayed by SDS-PAGE, Western blot or live-cell immunofluorescence assay as previously reported [14]. The hemagglutination of bovine erythrocytes and adliesion to cultured IDE8 tick cells of recombinant E. coli expressing the wild type and mutant proteins was evaluated in a microtitre hemagglutination and E. coli recovery adhesion assays, respectively, as reported [14]. 2. Results. To study the function and structural organization of tandem repeated peptides in MSPla we selected a recent A. marginale field isolate from Oklahoma that is tick-transmissible and for which we have cloned and characterized MSPla and MSPlb. A recombinant mutant MSPla was constructed lacking the tandem repeated peptides and expressed in E. coli. The recombinant mutant protein was expressed at high levels and was secreted to the E. coli membrane as shown by live-cell immunofluorescence. Nevertheless, the adhesion to cultured IDΕ8 tick cells of recombinant E. coli expressing the mutant protein was abolished when compared to the wild type MSPla (Table 2). To demonstrate that the MSPla repeats were not only necessary but sufficient to confer adhesion of recombinant E. coli to tick cells, we then constructed a chimeric protein containing the MSPla tandem repeated peptides fused to the COOH-terminus of the MSPlb. MSPlb did not confer an adhesive phenotype when expressed in E. coli (Table 3). However, E. coli expressing the chimeric protein adhered to cultured IDΕ8 tick cells at levels comparable to the wild type MSP la-expressing E. coli (Table 3). The capacity of MSPla to hemagglutinate bovine erythrocytes was also mediated by the tandem repeats. Recombinant E. coli expressing the MSPla lacking the tandem repeats were unable to hemagglutinate bovine erythrocytes (Table 2) while the chimeric MSP lb>MSP la-repeats protein expressed in E. coli conferred to recombinant bacteria a higher hemagglutination capacity (Table 3) when compared to wild type MSPs. Table 2. Hemagglutination of bovine erythrocytes and adhesion to cultured tick IDE8 cells by recombinant E. coli expressing A. marginale (Oklahoma isolate) MSPla wild type and mutant protein without repeats a 0, no hemagglutination; 1, weak hemagglutination; 2, moderate hemagglutination; 3, near maximum hemagglutination; 4, maximum hemagglutination [7]. Table 3. Hemagglutination of bovine erythrocytes and adhesion to cultured IDE8 tick cells ofE. coli expressing wild type MSPla or MSPlb (Oklahoma isolate) and MSP lb> MSP la-repeats mutant proteins a Plates were incubated for 2 hours at 4°C and results scored essentially as reported by McGarey and Alfred [7]: 0, no hemagglutination; 1, weak hemagglutination; 2, moderate hemagglutination; 3, near maximum hemagglutination; 4, maximum hemagglutination; 5, maximum hemagglutination in 1 hour. Accordingly, it can be appreciated that subunits derived from MSPla are useful as well in the inventive vaccine compositions. The inclusion of MSPla region(s) effecting MSPla biological function could enhance the host immune response directed against relevant immunoprotective epitopes. The preparation of vaccines utilizing as distinct antigenic components MSPla is easily accomplished using well known methods and techniques. The vaccine and/or antigen preparation is combined into a formulation in an amount effective to provide for a protective immune response against infection with A. marginale. A protective immune response against A. marginale decreases the clinical signs of anaplasmosis. Clinical symptoms of anaplasmosis include a reduction in packed red cell volume of about 25 to 80% and parasitemia of the red blood cells of about 15 to 70%. A decrease in the symptoms of anaplasmosis includes prevention of the reduction in the packed red cell volume and a decrease in percent parasitemia. Preferably, a protective response includes packed red cell volume change of 25% or less compared with control animals and/or a decrease in parasitemia to about 5 to 25% of the red blood cells or less depending on the conditions. Measurements of packed red cell volume and percent parasitemia are conducted using standard methods. Vaccine preparations are combined with physiologically acceptable carriers to form vaccines. The preferred physiologically acceptable carrier is an oil-based adjuvant. Preferably, the inventive vaccine formulation is set to contain about 100 micrograms of recombinant antigens associated to E. coli membranes in an oil-based adjuvant such as Xtend® III (Grand Laboratories, Larchwood, IA). The vaccines may be administered by a variety of routes including intravenously, intraperitoneally, intramuscularly, and subcutaneously. The preferred route of administration is subcutaneous. The vaccine can be administered in a single dose or multiple doses until a protective effect is achieved. While the invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiment(s) set for herein for purposes of exemplification, but is to be limited only by the scope of the attached claim or claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled. Bibliography Each of the following publicly available documents is incorporated herein by reference. [1] Kocan KM, Blouin EF, Barbet AF. Anaplasmosis control: past, present and future. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2000; 916: 501-509. [2] Barbet AF, Palmer GH, Myler PJ, McGuire TC. Characterization of an immunoprotective protein complex of Anaplasma marginale by cloning and expression of the gene coding for polypeptide AM 105L. Infect Immunl987; 55: 2428-2435. [3] Viseshakul N, Kamper S, Bowie MV, Barbet AF. Sequence and expression analysis of a surface antigen gene family of the rickettsia Anaplasma marginale. Gene 2000; 253: 45-53. [4] Palmer GH, Waghela SD, Barbet AF, Davis WC, McGuire TC. Characterization of a neutralization-sensitive epitope on the AM 105 surface protein of Anaplasma marginale. J Parasitol 1987; 17: 1279-1285. [5] Palmer GH, Barbet AF, Cantor GH, McGuire TC. Immunization of cattle with the MSP-1 surface protein complex induces protection against a structurally variant Anaplasma marginale isolate. Infect Immun 1989; 57: 3666-3669. [6] McGarey DJ, Barbet AF, Palmer GH, McGuire TC, Alfred DR. Putative adhesins of Anaplasma marginale: major surface polypeptides la and lb. Infect Immun 1994; 62: 4594-4601. [7] McGarey DJ, Alfred DR. Characterization of hemagglutinating components on the Anaplasma marginale initial body surface and identification of possible adhesins. Infect Immun 1994; 62: 4587-4593. [8] Munderloh UG, Blouin EF, Kocan KM, Ge NL. Establishment of the tick (Acari: Ixodidae)-borne cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in tick cell culture. J Med Ent 1996; 33: 656-664. [9] Blouin EF, Barbet AF, Jooyoung Yi, Kocan KM, Saliki JT. Establishment and characterization of an Oklahoma isolate of Anaplasma marginale in cultured Ixodes scapularis cells. Vet Parasitol 1999; 87: 301-313. [10] Blouin EF, Kocan KM. Morphology and development of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in cultured Ixodes scapularis (Acari Txodidae) cells. J Med Entomol 1998; 35: 788-797. [11] Barbet AF, Blentlinger R, Jooyoung Yi, Lundgren AM, Blouin EF, Kocan KM. Comparison of surface proteins of Anaplasma marginale grown in tick cell culture, tick salivary glands, and cattle. Infect Immunl999; 67: 102-107. [12] Oberle SM, Palmer GH, Barbet AF, McGuire TC. Molecular size variations in an immunoprotective protein complex among isolates of Anaplasma marginale. Infect Immun 1988; 56: 1567-1573. [13] Alfred DR, McGuire TC, Palmer GH, Leib SR, Harkins TM, McElwain TF, Barbet AF. Molecular basis for surface antigen size polymorphisms and conservation of a neutralization-sensitive epitope in Anaplasma marginale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 3220-3224. [14] de la Fuente, J., Garcia-Garcia, J.C., Blouin, E.F., Kocan, K.M. Differential adhesion of major surface proteins la and lb of the ehrlichial cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale to bovine erythrocytes and tick cells. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001; 31: 145-153. [15] de la Fuente, J., van den Bussche, R.A., Kocan, K.M. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of North American isolates of Anaplasma marginale. Veterinary Parasitology 2001; 97: 65-76.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A vaccine composition for inducing an immune response in a ruminant, said vaccine composition comprising at least one antigen member of the group comprising (i) recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of A. marginale, (ii) a subunit of recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of A. marginale and (iii) recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen or subunits thereof in combination with antigen preparation derived from A. marginale infected cultured tick IDE8 cells, wherein said vaccine composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. 2. The vaccine according to claim 1 wherein said antigen member is recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of A. marginale. 3. The vaccine according to claim 1 wherein said antigen member is a subunit of recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of A. marginale. 4. The vaccine according to claim 1 wherein said antigen member is recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen or subunits thereof in combination with antigen preparation derived from A. marginale infected cultured tick IDE8 cells. 5. A method for inducing an immune response in a ruminate to provide immune protection which reduces the severity of or infection by A. marginale, said method comprising administering to said ruminant an effective amount of the vaccine composition of claim 1. 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein said antigen member is recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of A. marginale. 1. The method according to claim 5 wherein said antigen member is a subunit of recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen of A. marginale. 8. The method according to claim 5 wherein said antigen member is recombinant MSPla surface protein antigen or subunits thereof in combination with antigen preparation derived from A. marginale infected cultured tick IDE8 cells.

Inventors: BLOUIN EDMOUR F, DE LA FUENTE JOSE DE JESUS, GARCIA-GARCIA JOSE CARLOS, KOCAN KATHERINE M, BLOUIN, EDMOUR, F., DE LA FUENTE, JOSE DE JESUS, GARCIA-GARCIA, JOSE, CARLOS, KOCAN, KATHERINE, M.
Applicants: UNIV OKLAHOMA STATE, THE BOARD OF REGENTS FOR OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
Application year: 2001
Main classification: A61K39
IPC codes: A61K39, A61P31