YEAST DERIVED VACCINE AGAINST IPNV

Abstract: Disclosed are processes for producing a vaccine for use against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) in fish, which process comprises culturing a yeast host cell which expresses, and preferably secretes, an IPNV polypeptide, and formulating the polypeptide as a vaccine (preferably by using, or partially purifying) the supernatant. Such vaccines have advantages over vaccines produced in bacteria. Also disclosed are vaccines based VP3 and VP2var proteins, optionally in combination with antigens protective against other fish diseases. The invention further provides related materials (e.g. primers, vectors and host cells) and methods and uses of the vaccines for prophylaxis and therapy.

Description: YEAST DERIVED VACCINE AGAINST IPNV The present invention relates to vaccine compositions to protect fish against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus. Background art Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) is an unenveloped, icosahedral, bisegmented dsRNA virus, and causes a highly contagious disease of young hatchery-reared salmon [1,2] as well as other farmed fish [3] . This disease, once established, is very difficult to eradicate from infected fish, and the development of a safe, efficient, and inexpensive vaccine against IPNV is very much needed. The outbreak of such disease brings about very serious economic damage to fish farmers . IPNV has one major structural protein, VP2 (52kD) , and three other proteins, VP1 (90kD) , VP3 (30kD) and VP4 (28kD) [4-7]. VPl is a putative viral polymerase [8], while VP2 is the major outer capsid protein [9] . VP3 is a further capsid protein and VP4 has been regarded as a cleaved form of VP3 during viral maturation [9,10]. The nucleotide and amino acid sequences for VP2 and VP3 are well known in the art see e.g. Havarstein et al (1990) "Sequence of the large double-stranded RNA segment of the NI strain of the infectious pancreatic necrosis virus: a comparison with other Birnaviridae" J Gen Virol 71: 299-308. It is also known that there are strain variations, see e.g. Pryde et al, 1992 Archives of Virology 129, 287-293. The sequences disclosed, in these references are specifically incorporated herein by reference . Currently available vaccines against IPNV include inactivated IPN virus, which is grown in fish cell lines and then inactivated using a standard viral inactivant. However, the large scale production of vaccines from fish cell lines can be costly. There is also a risk of reversion of the virus to the virulent form. WO94/04565 of Proteus House relates to a synthetic peptide having at least one antigenic property of a strain of IPNV, wherein the peptide consists substantially of a selected amino acid sequence. Peptides were synthesised using solid phase chemistry. WO 99/50419 (University of Maryland) relates to methods for preparing a non-pathogenic infectious pancreatic necrosis virus, comprising various steps which lead to NS-protein deficient IPNV. These virions were intended for use as live attenuated vaccines . In addition recombinant protein vaccines are discussed in various documents . Christie (1997), Fish Vaccinology, Dev Biol Stand. Basel, Karger, vol 90, pp 191-199, eds Gudding et al) discusses a vaccine produced in E. coli which contains recombinant VP2 protein. US 5165925 (University of Oregon) discusses methods for immunising fish against the VR-299 and SP serotypes of IPNV, wherein the vaccine consists essentially of a polypeptide from the viral A segment and including at least VP2, having been expressed in a bacterial host. In addition Korean patent application 227102 also relates to antigens from IPNV and related cDNA and vaccines Labus et al (2001) Fish & Shellfish Immunology 11: 203-216, which was published after the presently claimed priority dates, compares the antigenicity of structural proteins from IPNV when prepared in different host systems including bacteria and yeast. One of these proteins was VP2-trunc, said to encompass residues of 147-307 of VP2. The most authentic folding was believed to occur in CHSE (Chinook Salmon Embryo) and CHO (Chinese Hamster Ovary) cells. Notwithstanding the above disclosures there is an ongoing need for novel vaccine preparations which are effective against IPNV. Disclosure of the invention The present inventors have cloned and expressed IPNV antigens in the yeast strain Pichia pastoris . These expressed recombinant proteins were then used as a vaccine preparation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) . As shown in the Examples, such vaccine preparations appear to be highly effective. Surprisingly, as shown in the Examples hereinafter, it is believed they may be considerably more effective than available preparations from bacteria. In other aspects of the invention specific combinations of effective antigens, particularly bivalent vaccines, (for examples VP3 and a second protein, VP2var) are also provided, as are fusions of these and methods of producing and using them. Preferred vaccines consist essentially of VP3 and VP2var polypeptides, and are capable of inducing immunity in fish to the subsequent infection by the IPNV, said polypeptides having been produced in a yeast host by an expression vector compatible with the host, the expression vectors including an inserted DNA sequence from IPNV viral DNA coding for the IPNV polypeptide in the vaccine. Various aspects and embodiments of the present invention are set out in the claims herein. The invention will now be discussed in more detail . In one aspect of the present invention there is disclosed a process for producing a vaccine composition or preparation e.g. for use in Atlantic salmon { Salmo salar) which process comprises expressing a polypeptide encoding an IPNV protein (e.g. from the IPNV strain Sp) in a yeast strain (e.g. Pichia pastoris, preferably P. pastoris GS115) and formulating the polypeptide as a vaccine. A typical process of the present invention may comprise the steps of: (i) isolating one or more IPNV coding regions, (ii) preparing a recombinant plasmid containing the IPNV coding regions (i.e. one suitable for expression in yeast cell lines, which plasmid encodes one or more IPNV polypeptide or polypeptides) (iii) preparing yeast cell lines expressing the IPNV polypeptides (e.g. by electroporation, optionally separate plasmids in separate host cells) , (iv) screening for expression of the IPNV polypeptides in the cell lines, (v) immunising one or more fish with cell lines expressing the IPNV polypeptides (or preparations of the polypeptides therefrom) . The preferred IPNV proteins, combinations of proteins, and fusions are discussed in more detail below. Most preferred are VP3 and VP2var (a smaller region of the whole VP2 protein which shows the highest degree of amino acid variation between strains) . Preferably the method comprises expressing two different IPNV proteins in Pichia pastoris such as to produce a bivalent vaccine Generally speaking, in the light of the disclosure of the present invention, those skilled in the art are will be able to construct appropriate vectors and design protocols for recombinant gene expression. Suitable vectors can be chosen or constructed, containing appropriate regulatory sequences, including promoter sequences (see below), terminator fragments, polyadenylation sequences, enhancer sequences, marker genes, signal sequences and other sequences as appropriate. For further evidence of the common general knowledge see, for example, Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual : 2nd edition, Sambrook et al , 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (or later editions of this work) . Many known techniques and protocols for manipulation of nucleic acid, for example in preparation of nucleic acid constructs, mutagenesis (see above discussion in respect of variants) , sequencing, introduction of DNA into cells and gene expression, and analysis of proteins, are described in detail in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Second Edition, Ausubel et al . eds . , John Wiley & Sons, 1992. The disclosures of Sambrook et al. and Ausubel et al . are incorporated herein by reference . Preferably, the expressed polypeptide is secreted from the host cell and the vector preferably includes a signal sequence to direct the protein so that it is secreted from the cell. A preferred signal sequence is the yeast α mating factor signal sequence. In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an appropriate IPNV-expressing yeast vector and its use therein. "Vector" is defined to include, inter alia, any plasmid, cosmid or phage in double or single stranded linear or circular form which may or may not be self transmissible or mobilizable, and which can transform a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host either by integration into the cellular genome or exist extrachromosomally (e.g. autonomous replicating plasmid with an origin of replication) . The vector may be a bi-functional expression vector which functions in multiple hosts . In the case of cDNA this may be under the control of an appropriate promoter or other regulatory elements for expression in the host cell. A preferred vector is the Pichia pastoris expression vector, pPICZαB. In a further aspect of the invention, there is disclosed a host cell containing or transformed with a heterologous vector according to the present invention, especially a microbial cell. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the term "heterologous" is used broadly in this aspect to indicate that the IPNV sequence of nucleotides in question have been introduced into the yeast cell, or a progenitor cell thereof, using genetic engineering, i.e. by human intervention. Nucleic acid heterologous to the host cell will be non-naturally occurring in the host cell type. The polypeptide may be partially purified from the host before being used as a vaccine. Where the polypeptide is secreted from the host cell, the cells may be separated from the media by centrifugation, the cells being pelleted and the media being the supernatant. In such a situation, the supernatant, which contains the secreted polypeptide, may be used directly as a vaccine, or in a vaccine composition. Alternatively, the polypeptide may be partially purified from this supernatant, for example using affinity chromatography. The method may further comprise admixing the partially purified polypeptide with another component, such as another polypeptide and/or an adjuvant, diluent or excipient as described below. Vaccine preparations or compositions obtainable by the preceding methods form one aspect of the present invention. In one aspect of the present invention the vaccine produced in the yeast such as Pichia is based on VP2 and\or VP3 or immunogenic combinations or fragments of either. In the case of fragments, in each case, the vaccine polypeptides disclosed herein may comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the fragment in question. In a preferred VP2-based embodiments, the fragment is VP2var. This is a smaller region of the VP2 protein previously identified as a variable segment of VP2 comprising approximately 150 amino acids (amino acids 183-337; 678-1140 nt ) (Havarstein, et al, 1990 Journal of General Virology 71, 299-308) . The protein is discussed in the Pryde et al (1992) study supra which compared the sequence from a 192 amino acid stretch of VP2 isolated from a Scottish IPNV strain (Sp serotype) against the same region of a field isolate from Shetland (Sh serotype) , a Norwegian strain (NI serotype) and a Canadian strain (Ja serotype) . The Sh strain differed from Sp by 1 amino acid substitution, the NI strain by 2 substitutions and the Ja by 33 substitutions . Preferred primers for use in the methods of the present invention are specific for the polypeptides in question, and preferably are those which introduce restriction sites for cloning and\or avoid GC rich sequences. For example: 559 586 CTA ACA ACG GAA TTC ATG GAC AAA GTC VP2var forward primer (SEQ ID. NO. 1) EcoRI site A preferred primer for use with a secretion signal vector is as follows : 5' gaagctgcagaggacaaagtcaac3' VP2var forward (SEQ ID. NO. 2) A further preferred primer is: CGT TGC CGA TTG GCG GCC GCT GGT TGA TC VP2var reverse primer (SEQ ID. NO. 3) Notl site The sequences obtainable by using SEQ ID. NO. 1 and 2 respectively with SEQ ID. NO. 3 are given as Sequence Annex A. In another embodiment preferred primers are: 5' accactgcagtcacagtcctgaatc3' VP2var forward (SEQ ID. NO. 4) 5' gagcgcggccgccgcaattccgttccctg3' VP2var reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 5) The sequence obtainable by using SEQ ID. NO. 4 and 5 is given as Sequence Annex B. Thus there is provided a vaccine composition comprising a polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence of VP2var obtainable using any of these primers, corresponding to any of these regions, or having any of the sequences given in Annex A or B. Embodiments of this aspect may comprises a VP2 polypeptide as described above in combination with a VP3 polypeptide or fragment. For instance as obtainable by use of the following primers: 2305 2330 CCT GGG ACT GCA GAT GGC ATC AAA TG VP3 forward primer (SEQ ID. NO. 6) Pstl site GTT ACA CCG CGG CCG CGT CTC CGC TGG G VP3 reverse primer (SEQ ID. NO. 7) Notl site The sequence obtainable by using SEQ ID. NO. 6 and 7 is given as Sequence Annex C. Other preferred primers for use with a secretion signal vector are as follows : 5' gacgctgcagtgcaacgcctcctg 3' VP3 forward (SEQ ID. NO. 8) 5' gtgcagcggccgccgggggtcgtcgtttcatc 3' VP3reverse 2936-2967 (SEQ ID. NO. 9) The sequence obtainable by using SEQ ID. NO. 8 and 9 is given as Sequence Annex D. Thus there is provided a vaccine composition comprising a polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence of VP3 obtainable using any of these primers, corresponding to any of these regions, or having any of the sequences given in Annex C or D. Sequences may be obtained using primers from base sequences according to methods well known to those skilled in the art. A typical method may use lng of purified template DNA containing the coding regions for VP2 and VP3, 25ρmoles each PCR primer in 45μl of PCR master mix containing 2.5mM MgCl 2 (Advanced Biotechnologies). Cycling may be carried out e.g. in a Perkin Elmer Thermocycler using the following cycling parameters; 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 30s at 48°C, lmin 20s at 72°C, 30s at 94°C and a final incubation of lO in at 72°C. A lOμl aliquot of the resultant PCR reactions is then electrophoretically separated through a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.5μg/ml ethidium bromide. In another embodiment of the present invention provides for the production of IPNV vaccines by combination of one or more copies of each of (all or part of) the VP2 or VP3 antigens, fused together in the correct orientation for expression as a single polypeptide. For example, this may comprise a fusion protein derived from at least one copy of each of the VP2 and VP3 protein sequences joined end to end. To achieve this, multiple copies of the coding region from the relevant IPNV genes are ligated together to form a single open reading frame with a single initiation and termination codon. This is cloned into a suitable expression vector and recombinantly produced as previously described. The resulting "multivalent IPNV antigen" contains at least one copy of each of the antigenic protein sequences contained within both the IPNV antigens, and is therefore a more potent stimulator of a host immune response. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the IPNV vaccine is comprised of a novel combination of two or more copies of either the VP2 or VP3 antigens, fused together in the correct orientation for expression as a single polypeptide. For example, this may comprise a fusion protein derived from 2 copies of the VP3 protein sequence joined end to end, or two copies of the VP2 protein joined end to end. To achieve this, multiple copies of the coding region from the relevant IPNV gene are ligated together to form a single open reading frame with a single initiation and termination codon. This is cloned into a suitable expression vector and recombinantly produced as previously described. This resulting "multimeric IPNV antigen" contains multiple copies of the antigenic protein sequence-contained within the IPNV antigen, and is therefore a more potent stimulator of a host immune response. Preferred primers for use with a secretion signal vector are as follows : 5' gacgctgcagtgcaacgcctcctg 3' VP3 forward (SEQ ID. NO. 10) 5' ctctctagagtctccgctggg 3' VP3 reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 11) 5' ccctcagagtcacagtcctg 3 VP2var forward (SEQ ID. NO. 12) 5' gagcgcggccgccgcaattccgttccctg3' VP2var reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 13) The amplified nucleotide sequences, when ligated together, code for a hybrid protein consisting of amino acids of VP3 fused to amino acids of VP2. This is shown as Annex E. Vaccines produced in yeast may therefore include (comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of) any one or more of the IPNV polypeptides discussed above and described in Sequence Annexes hereto. The polypeptides need not be in pure form, provided that they are capable of conferring a protective response in a fish into which they are introduced. The vaccine may be a bivalent vaccine and may comprising a further polypeptide derived from the IPNV virus, preferably as shown in any of Sequence Annexes A-E. Preferred vaccines comprise two polypeptides derived from the IPNV virus, preferably based on VP2var and VP3. These two polypeptides may be expressed as a fusion. Indeed it is believed that such bivalent vaccines are particularly effective and such preferred combination vaccines (howsoever produced, although preferably produced in a yeast such as Pichia) form one particular aspect of the invention. Minor variants of the above sequences may be employed in particular embodiments as described hereinafter. Vaccines may contain other bacterial antigens used to control other diseases i.e. vaccine composition may be included within a multivalent vaccine which includes antigens against other diseases of fish. Thus a preferred multivalent injection vaccine may contain the two IPN proteins discussed above, plus antigens to other fish diseases such as Aeromonas salmonicida (Strain MT004) and\or Aeromonas salmonicida (Strain MT423) [see EP 0587636 of the Secretary of State for Scotland] . Also one or more Vibrio antigens (including V. anguillarum, V. salmonicida and V. viscosus) antigens e.g. inactivated Vibrio anguillarum (Strain 78-SKID) ; Inactivated Vibrio anguillarum (Strain MSC 275) ; Inactivated Vijrio salmonicida (Strain VS 855); Inactivated Vibrio viscosus (Strain HW/98/7/2) IPNV proteins when used in the present invention may be fused to other sequences. For example, The polypeptide may be in the form of a fusion protein, for example it may be linked to a leader or signal sequence as discussed above. Such a sequence may, for example cause the expressed protein to be secreted from the host cell. Such a sequence may be cleaved off from the rest of the polypeptide before the polypeptide is formulated into a composition, or may be retained on the polypeptide in the composition. Preferably, the signal sequence is the yeast α-mating factor signal sequence. Preferably the signal sequence is not cleaved from the expressed polypeptide, but is retained on the polypeptide and thereby forms part of the vaccine. Polypeptides disclosed herein may be linked to a suitable carrier e.g. to enhance immunogenicity. Suitable carriers include bovine serum albumin, keyhole limpet haemocyanin etc. The polypeptide may be attached to a linker polypeptide, which linker peptide links the polypeptide to a particles such as latex or bentonite. This may facilitate its administration as an immersion vaccine (see below) . Linker polypeptides may comprise functional domains such as acidic blob domains from eukaryotic transcription factors, or histone protein polybasic domains. In addition to the polypeptides, the vaccine composition may further comprise a pharmologically acceptable diluent, buffer, adjuvant, or excipient, or combination of these. Such materials should be non- toxic and should not interfere with the efficacy of the active ingredient. The precise nature of the carrier or other material will depend on the route of administration, which may be oral, or by injection, e.g. intravenous. Microparticle formulations which may be used in the present invention include biodegradable microspheres composed of polymer materials such as polyester poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) (Eldridge et al , Molec Immunol 28: 287-294 (1991), and atelocollagen (Fujioka et al r J. Control. Release 33: 307-315 (1995). Injection of atelocollagen "Minipellets" containing a plasmid encoding human HST I/FGF-4 has been shown to result in slow release of DNA and subsequent prolonged expression of functional protein in mice (Ochiya et al , Nature Medicine 5: 707-710 (1999)). PLG microspheres are sufficiently robust to survive ingestion and arrive intact at the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (Eldridge et al , Adv Exp Med Biol 251: 191-202 (1989)), and have been used to introduce recombinant antigens and attenuated viruses into mammals by both systemic and oral routes (O'Hagan et al , Immunology 73: 239-242 (1991); O'Hagan et al , Vaccine 11: 149-154 (1993); Marx et al , Science 260: 1323-1328 (1993); Jones et al , Vaccine 15: 814-817 (1997)) . In fish orally incubated with human gamma globulin incorporated into PLG microparticles, uptake of the foreign protein into intestinal tissues and the kidneys was demonstrable (O'Donnell et al , Fish & Shellfish Immunol. 6: 507-520 (1996) ) . Thus the present invention also relates to methods for formulation of such proteins to render them suitable for administration by immersion or orally via incorporation into fish food. In one embodiment of the invention pertaining to formulation of the vaccine for the immersion vaccination of fish, the recombinant proteins are packaged within a micro-particulate delivery system, which may include, but is not limited to, latex beads, poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres, atelocollagen "minipellets", bentonite, orporous apatite ceramics including hypoxyapatite (HA) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) . Suitable materials are well known to the person skilled in the art. Examples include; water, saline (e.g. 0.85% sodium chloride; see Ph.Eur. monograph 2001:0062), buffered saline, fish oil with an emulsifier (e.g. a lecithin, Bolec MT) , inactivant (e.g. formaldehyde; see Ph.Eur. monograph 1997:0193), mineral oils, such as light mineral oils, alhydrogel, aluminium hydroxide. Where used herein, the term "oil adjuvant" to embraces both mineral oils and synthetic oils. A preferred adjuvant is Montanide ISA 711 (SeppicQuai D'OrsaY, 75321 Paris, France) which is a manide oleate in an oil suspension. For example, for an immersion vaccine, an aqueous suspension is preferred. For an oral vaccine a fish oil and lecithin carrier system is preferred. For an injection vaccine Montanide ISA711®, Sepic at a ratio of 30:70 is preferred. Preferred doses range from 50 to 150 μg antigen per fish, more preferably 70 to 125 μg per fish. A preferred dose is about lOOμg per fish. For injection most preferred is dosage unit comprising 105μg of each of the VP2 and VP3 antigen in 100 μl i.e. 1.05 g/1 of each protein. For oral use emulsion is added to fish feed pellets and and fed over a 10 day feeding period to deliver an equivalent of 100 μl of vaccine . Those skilled in the art are well aware of typical modes of administration. For example: A vaccine composition may be administered orally or by injection. As is well known in the art, one preferred mode of administration is comprises the use of oral vaccination technologies whereby vaccine is administered in fish food, or by direct addition of vaccine to the water in which the fish swim ("immersion vaccination"). Optionally this may be used in revaccination in order to boost immunity established by other means (Dunn et al , Aquacultural Engineering 9: 23-32 (1990); Ellis, Fish Pathology 30:293-300 (1995). Thus in certain embodiments, microparticles such as those discussed above are administered by immersion of the aquaculture species in a suspension fluid containing the microparticles at an appropriate concentration, or by incorporation into fish food. A vaccine composition may be administered alone or in combination with other treatments, either simultaneously or sequentially. A vaccine composition may be administered as a course of a number of discrete doses over a period of time. For example it may be administered over a period of around fourteen days . Vaccination may be repeated at daily, twice-weekly, weekly or monthly intervals. For example a boost vaccination may be administered after the initial dose. For example a boost may be administered at around fourteen weeks after the vaccination. The initial vaccination and any boost may be carried out using the same or different modes of administration. For example, the initial may be by injection and the boost may be by oral administration. A preferred regime includes a first vaccination by injection, followed by (14 weeks post challenge) a two week course of orally administered boost vaccine, or a booster prior to an expected IPN outbreak (e.g. just after transfer to seawater) . In a preferred embodiment, microparticles containing recombinant protein are diluted to a suitable concentration in an enclosed tank containing water as used for the normal culturing of the relevant fish species and fish fry are immersed in this solution for a period of several hours. The fish are then returned to their normal culturing conditions. With this practice the recombinant proteins may enter the gills or digestive tract of the fish and be engulfed by antigen presenting cells and subsequently induce an immune response. In a second preferred embodiment, microparticles containing the recombinant proteins are incorporated into a typical fish food preparation and fed to fish in place of ordinary feed. In this method the recombinant proteins will enter-the digestive tract stimulating an immune response in systemic or gut-associated lymphoid tissues. This method has the advantage of being suitable for use in netted enclosures where sealed tanks are not available. Other adjuvants, carriers etc., and modes of administration may be found by referring to Gudding et al (1999) Veterinary immunology and Immunopathology 72, 203-212. The polypeptides (including variants, derivatives, fusions and conjugates) described herein may also be used in methods of diagnosis for IPNV, and such use of the polypeptides and diagnostic methods constitute further' aspects of the invention. For example, the polypeptides may be used as a substrate to screen for antibodies in a fish and thereby determine whether or not the fish has been infected with IPNV. Such an assay could be by ELISA, or other technique as would be understood by the person skilled in the art. The polypeptides including variants, derivatives, fusions and conjugates) described herein may also be used in the manufacture of a vaccine or other medicament for treatment of, or having prophylactic effect against IPNV. The present invention further provides a method of therapeutic treatment or prophylaxis of IPNV, comprising administering a vaccine composition as described herein to a fish. In a still further aspect the present invention provides a fish population which has been treated or immunized with a vaccine or composition described elsewhere herein. The IPNV preparations described herein e.g. produced recombinantly in yeast by expression from encoding nucleic acid therefor, may be used to raise antibodies employing techniques which are standard in the art. Such antibodies may function in vivo as protective (neutralising) antibodies, or may be isolated e.g. for use in ELISA As discussed above, embodiments of the present invention also embrace processes, methods and vaccine (compositions) based upon polypeptides which are variants (fragment, derivative or homologue etc.) of the sequences of VP2var or VP3 given herein. The variant may be capable of stimulating the production of antibodies which bind IPNV, these antibodies may be neutralizing antibodies. The production of antibodies which bind IPNV, or which neutralize IPNV may be assessed by ELISA or by neutralization assays, respectively. Appropriate assays are described elsewhere herein. Artificial variants (derivatives) may be prepared by those skilled in the art, for instance by site directed or random mutagenesis of a nucleic acid encoding the polypeptide shown in a sequence Annex, the variant polypeptide may then be produced by expression from a suitable host, e.g., Pichia pastoris as described elsewhere herein. Alternatively the variant maybe produced by direct synthesis . Preferably the variant polypeptide is generated either directly or indirectly (e.g. via one or amplification or replication steps) from an original nucleic acid encoding all or part of the sequences shown in a sequence Annex. Homology (i.e. similarity or identity) may be as defined using sequence comparisons are made using FASTA and FASTP (see Pearson & Lipman, 1988. Methods in Enzymology 183: 63-98). Parameters are preferably set, using the default matrix, as follows: Gapopen (penalty for the first residue in a gap) : -12 for proteins; Gapext (penalty for additional residues in a gap) : -2 for proteins; KTUP word length: 2 for proteins. Preferably the amino acid sequence shares at least about 60%, or 70%, or 80% homology, most preferably at least about 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% homology with the sequences shown herein. Thus a vaccine of the present invention may comprise a variant polypeptide which includes within the sequence shown herein, a single amino acid or 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 changes, about 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 or 50 changes. In addition to one or more changes within the amino acid sequence shown, a variant polypeptide may include additional amino acids at the C-terminus and/or N-terminus. Changes may be desirable for a number of reasons, including introducing or removing the following features : sites which are required for post translation modification; cleavage sites in the encoded polypeptide; motifs in the encoded polypeptide (e.g. epitopes) . Leader or other targeting sequences (e.g. hydrophobic anchoring regions) may be added or removed from the expressed protein to determine its location following expression. Other desirable mutations may be made by random or site directed mutagenesis of the nucleic acid encoding the polypeptide in order to alter the activity (e.g. specificity) or stability of the encoded polypeptide. Changes may be by way of conservative variation, i.e. substitution of one hydrophobic residue such as isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine for another, or the substitution of one polar residue for another, such as arginine for lysine, glutamic for aspartic acid, or glutamine for asparagine. As is well known to those skilled in the art, altering the primary structure of a polypeptide by a conservative substitution may not significantly alter the activity of that peptide because the side-chain of the amino acid which is inserted into the sequence may be able to form similar bonds and contacts as the side chain of the amino acid which has been substituted out. This is so even when the substitution is in a region which is critical in determining the peptides conformation. Also included are variants having non-conservative substitutions . As is well known to those skilled in the art, substitutions to regions of a peptide which are not critical in determining its conformation may not greatly affect its ability to raise antibodies because they do not greatly alter the peptide' s three dimensional structure. In regions which are critical in determining the peptides conformation or activity such changes may confer advantageous properties on the polypeptide. Indeed, changes such as those described above may confer slightly advantageous properties on the peptide e.g. altered stability or immunogenicity. The invention will now be further described with reference to the following non-limiting Examples and Annexes. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art in the light of these. Figures, Tables Figure 1 shows 10 % SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie blue. (A) Shows samples of culture supernatant from Pichia pastoris expressing VP2var taken at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48h following induction. (B) Shows samples of culture supernatant expressing VP3 taken at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48h following induction. Figure 2 shows the percentage of challenged fish whose antibodies bound to immobilized IPNV virus in ELISA tests. Figure 3 shows the percentage of boosted fish whose antibodies bound to immobilized IPNV virus in ELISA tests. Figure 4 shows the percentage of untreated fish whose antibodies bound to immobilized IPNV virus in ELISA tests. Sequence Annex Annexes A-E show preferred IPNV-derived peptides of the invention. Examples Example 1 - Production of vp2var \ vp3 bivalent vaccine a) Isola tion of IPNV coding regions Plasmids containing the coding regions for VP2 and VP3 proteins from IPNV strain Sp were obtained from Dr David Smail, University of Aberdeen as glycerol stocks of transformed E. coli DH5α, from whom they are available on request. In these stocks, the whole coding region of VP2 was cloned into the plasmid vector pUC18 and the whole coding region of VP3 was cloned into TA cloning vector (Stead., The application of recombinant DNA technology to the study of the infectious pancreatic necrosis virus . PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 1994) . Plasmid was prepared from these glycerol stocks using the 3' -5' plasmid preparation kit under the manufacturer's instructions. PCR primers were designed to allow the amplification of a shortened coding region of VP2 and the whole coding region of VP3, while introducing enzyme restriction sites to allow the subsequent cloning into the Pichia pastoris expression vector, pPICZαB. The primers are shown below. The start codons for each protein are shown in the forward primers in bold and the restriction enzyme site are indicated by underlining. 559 586 CTA ACA ACG GAA TTC ATG GAC AAA GTC VP2var forward primer -ScoRI site or in other embodiments: 5' gaagctgcagaggacaaagtcaac3' VP2var forward along with: CGT TGC CGA TTG GCG GCC GCT GGT TGA TC VP2var reverse primer NotI site 2305 2330 CCT GGG ACT GCA GAT GGC ATC AAA TG VP3 forward primer Pstl site GTT ACA CCG CGG CCG CGT CTC CGC TGG G VP3 reverse primer NotI site PCR was carried out using lng of purified plasmid DNA containing the coding regions for VP2 and VP3, 25pmoles each PCR primer in 45μl of PCR master mix containing 2.5mM MgCl 2 (Advanced Biotechnologies). Cycling was carried out in a Perkin Elmer Thermocycler using the following cycling parameters; 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 30s at 48°C, lmin 20s at 72°C, 30s at 94°C and a final incubation of lOmin at 72°C. A lOμl aliquot of the resultant PCR reactions were electrophoretically separated through a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.5μg/ml ethidium bromide. If amplification of the IPNV coding regions was successful, the DNA from the remainder of each PCR reaction was purified using the PCR clean up kit from Pro ega under manufacturer's instructions. b) Preparation of recombinant pPICZαB plasmids containing IPNV coding regions . The purified IPNV PCR products underwent restriction enzyme digestion to facilitate cloning into the Pichia pastoris expression vector pPICZαB. VP2var PCR products were digested using the restriction endonucleases EcoRI and Notl or Pstl and Notl depending on the primer used, while the VP3 PCR products were digested using Pstl and Notl . Restriction digestions were set up by combining the following components; 30μl purified PCR product, 4μl restriction enzyme buffer, 4μl acetylated BSA(lmg/ml) and lμl of each restriciton enzyme. The digestions were incubated at 37°C for 90min. In addition, pPICZαB plasmid was also digested using the same enzymes to allow each IPNV PCR product to be cloned. Plasmid restriction digestions were set up by combining the following components; lμg plasmid DNA, lμl restriction enzyme buffer, lμl acetylated BSA(lmg/ml), lμl each restriction enzyme and 5μl distilled water. The digestions were incubated at 37°C for 90 min. Following the incubation period, the digested DNA was purified from each sample by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation at -80°C for 20 min. The DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000rpm for 15 min, the pellets air dried and resuspended in lOμl distilled water. Ligations were prepared by combining the following components; 5μl digested IPNV PCR product, Iμl digested pPICZαB plasmid, lμl lOx ligase buffer, 2μl distilled water and lμl T4 DNA ligase. The ligations were incubated overnight at 4°C. The following day, a 3μl aliquot of each ligation mix was used to transform electrocompetent E. coli TOP10F' cells (Invitrogen) under manufacturer's instructions. Following cell recovery, aliquots of the transformed cells were plated onto LB agar plates containing 25μg/ml zeocin and the plates incubated, inverted, overnight at 37°C. Each resultant colony was used to inoculate 5ml of LB medium containing 25μg/ml zeocin which was subsequently incubated overnight at 37°C with vigorous aeration. Recombinant pPICZαB plasmid was prepared from 1ml of each overnight culture using the 3' -5' plasmid preparation kit. The remaining culture was used to prepare glycerol stocks which were stored at -80°C. Recombinant plasmids were screened for the presence of a insert by restriction digestion with either EcoRI and Notl (VP2var) or Pstl and Notl (VP3) using the protocol outlined previously. Digestions were electrophoretically separated through a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.5μg/ml ethidium bromide. Plasmids which contained the correct sized inserts were further analysed by automated DNA sequencing. c) Preparation of Pichia pastoris cell lines expressing VP2var and VP3 Recombinant pPICZαB plasmids which had been shown to contain either the coding region for VP2var or VP3 by restriction digestion analysis and DNA sequence analysis were prepared for transformation into Pichia pastoris strain GS115 as outlined below. Large scale plasmid preparations of each recombinant pPICZαB plasmid were carried out using the 3'-5' plasmid prepartion kit under manufacturer's instuctions. Approximately 10μg of each plasmid was prepared. The recombinant plasmids were linearised prior to their transformation into P. pastoris GS115 using the restriction enzyme Sacl by combining the following components; 5μg recombinant plasmid (40μl approximately) , 6μl lOx restriction enzyme buffer, 6μl acetylated BSA(lmg/ml), 6μl distilled water and 2μl Sad . The digestions were incubated at 37°C for 90 min. Following this incubation the digested plasmid were purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation at -80°C for 20 min. The linearised plasmids were resuspended in lOμl distilled water. Electrocompetent Pichia pastoris GS115 cells were prepared as outlined below. A single colony of GS115 was used to inoculate 5ml of YPD medium which was then incubated overnight at 30°C with vigorous aeration. The following day 0.5ml of this overnight culture was used to inoculate 500ml of fresh YPD medium which was grown overnight as before. The cells were pelleted at 1500g for 5 min at 4°C and the pellet resuspended in 500ml of ice-cold sterile, distilled water. The cells were pelleted as before and resuspended in 250ml of ice- cold sterile, distilled water. The cells were pelleted again and resuspended in 20ml of ice-cold sterile IM sorbitol, pelleted for the last time and resuspended in 1ml of ice-cold IM sorbitol. The cells were used immediately. 80μl of the electrocompetent cells were mixed with lOμl linearised plasmid described above, and transferred to an ice-cold 0.2cm electroporation cuvette. The cuvette was incubated on ice for 5min. The cell and DNA mix was pulsed in a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser with a charging voltage of 1500V, a capacitance of 25μF and a resistance of 200Ω. 1ml of ice-cold IM sorbitol was added and the contents transferred to a sterile 15ml tube. The cells were allowed to recover by incubation at 30°C for l-2h without shaking. Aliquots of the cells were plated onto YPDS plates containing lOOμg/ml zeocin. The plates were incubated for 2-3 days at 30°C until colonies formed. The resultant colonies were screened for the Mut Phenotype as outlined below. Colonies resulting from the transformation of Pichia pastoris GS115 transformation were replica plated onto MMH and MDH plates. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 2-3 day until colonies formed. Colonies which are Mut + show normal growth on both plates while colonies which are Mut s show normal growth on MDH plates but little is any growth on MMH plates . This method revealed all of the cell lines containing VP2var coding region to be Mut + while all of the cell lines containing VP3 coding region to be Mut s . Small scale expressions were carried out using the recombinant Pichia pastoris GS115 colonies in order to screen for expression of VP2 var and VP3 in these cell lines. VP2var con taining Pichia (Mut + ) : Each colony was used to inoculate 25ml of BMGY medium in a 250ml flask. The cultures were incubated overnight at 30°C with vigorous aeration. The following day the cells were harvested at 1500g for 5 min at room temperature and the cell pellet resuspended in 100ml of BMMY to induce protein expression. The culture was incubated in a 11 flask at 30°C with vigorous aeration with 100% methanol being added to a final concentration of 0.5% every 24h. 1ml aliquots were removed at the following time points; 0, 6, 8, 24, 32, 48, 56, 72 and 80 hours, the cells were pelleted and the supernatant transferred to a fresh tube. Both cell pellet and supernatant were stored at -80°C until all time point samples had been collected. VP3 containing Pichia (Mut s ) : Each colony was used to inoculate 100ml of BMGY medium in a 11 flask. The cultures were incubated overnight at 30°C with vigorous aeration. The following day the cells were harvested at 1500g for 5 min at room temperature and the cell pellet resuspended in 20ml of BMMY to induce protein expression. The culture was incubated in a 250ml flask at 30°C with vigorous aeration with 100% methanol being added to a final concentration of 0.5% every 24h. 1ml aliquots were removed at the following time points; 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, the cells were pelleted and the supernatant transferred to a fresh tube. Both cell pellet and supernatant were stored at -80°C until all time point samples had been collected. The samples collected during the small scale expression were analysed by SDS-PAGE through a 15% acrylamide gel . Two identical gels were run for each sample, one of which was stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue to visualise the proteins and the other was western blotted onto nitrocellulose and immunoblotted with specific anti-VP2 and ant-VP3 monoclonal antibodies . This allowed the optimum expression period to be determined for each cell line. Glycerol stocks were prepared for each cell line which showed good expression of VP2var or VP3. These were stored at -80°C. Example 2 - Alternative production of vp2var \ vp3 a) Construction of recombinant plasmids PCR was used to amplify the coding regions of VP3 or VP2var using the PCR primers : VP3 forward 2342-2367 5' gacgctgcagtgcaacgcctcctg 3' VP3reverse 2936-2967 5' gtgcagcggccgccgggggtcgtcgtttcatc 3' VP2var forward 602-630 5' accactgcagtcacagtcctgaatc3' VP2var reverse 1143-1172 5' gagcgcggccgccgcaattccgttccctg3' The PCR products were digested using the restriction enzymes Pstl and Notl to produce cohesive ends . The sequences were ligated into the expression plasmid pPICZαB which had been digested using the restriction enzymes Pstl and Notl and dephosphorylated using calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into the E. coli strain TOP10F' using standard electroporation. The transformant mix was plated out onto LB agar plates containing 25μg/ml zeocin. Transformants were used to inoculate 2ml LB medium containing 25μg/ml zeocin and were grown overnight at 37°C with shaking. Plasmid was isolated from each overnight culture using standard methodology and the plasmids DNA sequenced to confirm the sequence of the inserts. b) Genera tion of recombinant Pichia pastoris clones 5-10μg of recombinant plasmid DNA was digested with Pmel using standard methodology. 20μl of the digest mix was used to transform lOOμl competent Pichia pastoris strain GS115 cells using the Easycomp Transformation kit (Invitrogen) under manufacturer's instructions. The transformation mix was plated out onto YPD agar plates containing lOOμg/ml zeocin and incubated at 30°C for 2-4 days. c) Expression of recombinant VP3 or VP2var protein A single colony of recombinant Pichia containing pPICZαB/VP3 or pPICZαB/VP2var was used to inoculate 25ml BMGH medium in a 250ml baffled conical flask. The culture was grown at 30°C in a shaking incubator (250-300rpm) until the culture reached an OD 60 o of 3.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2000rpm for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet resuspended in BMMH medium to an OD SO o of 1.0. The culture was placed in a litre baffled conical flask and incubation continued at 30°C in a shaking incubator (250-300rpm) for a period of 72-108h. 100% methanol was added to each culture, every 24h, to a final concentration of 0.5%. Following expression the recombinant protein was harvested by centrifugation at 2000rpm for lOmin at room temperature. The supernatant was decanted, filter sterilise and aliquoted into 1ml samples. The supernatant samples were stored at -20°C. A sample of each expression culture was analysed for protein expression using SDS-PAGE and western blotting using specific antisera. The sequences are given in Annex C and D. Example 3 - production of vp2var \ vp3 hybrid clone a) Construction of recombinant plasmids PCR was used to amplify the coding regions of VP3 and VP2var using the PCR primers : VP3 forward 2342-2367 5' gacgctgcagtgcaacgcctcctg 3' VP3 reverse 3023-3044 5' ctctctagagtctccgctggg 3' VP2var forward 603-622 5' ccctcagagtcacagtcctg 3' VP2var reverse 1143-1172 5' gagcgcggccgccgcaattccgttccctg3' The amplified nucleotide sequences, when ligated together, code for a hybrid protein consisting of amino acids 9-244 of VP3 fused to amino acids 163-357 of VP2. The PCR products were mixed together anddigested using the restriction enzymes Pstl, Xbal and Notl to produce cohesive ends. The VP3 and VP2var PCR prodcuts were ligated together to produce a hybrid sequence. The hybrid sequence was subsequently ligated into the expression plasmid pPICZαB which had been digested using the restriction enzymes Pstl and Notl and dephosphorylated using calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into the E. coli strain TOP10F' using standard electroporation. The transformant mix was plated out onto LB agar plates containing 25μg/ml zeocin. Transformants were used to inoculate 2ml LB medium containing 25μg/ml zeocin and were grown overnight at 37°C with shaking. Plasmid was isolated from each overnight culture using standard methodology and the plasmids DNA sequenced to confirm the sequence of the inserts. b) Generation of recombinant Pichia pastoris clones 5-1Oμg of recombinant plasmid DNA was digested with Pmel using standard methodology. 20μl of the digest mix was used to transform lOOμl competent Pichia pastoris strain GS115 cells using the Easycomp Transformation kit (Invitrogen) under manufacturer's instructions. The transformation mix was plated out onto YPD agar plates containing lOOμg/ml zeocin and incubated at 30°C for 2-4 days. c) Expression of recombinant VP3 or VP2var protein A single colony of recombinant Pichia containing pPICZαB/VP3VP2var hybrid was used to inoculate 25ml BMGH medium in a 250ml baffled conical flask. The culture was grown at 30°C in a shaking incubator (250-300rpm) until the culture reached an OD 60 o of 3.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2000rpm for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet resuspended in BMMH medium to an OD 6 oo of 1.0. The culture was placed in a litre baffled conical flask and incubation continued at 30°C in a shaking incubator (250-300rpm) for a period of 72-108h. 100% methanol was added to each culture, every 24h, to a final concentration of 0.5%. Following expression the recombinant protein was harvested by centrifugation at 2000rpm for lOmin at room temperature. The supernatant was decanted, filter sterilise and aliquoted into 1ml samples. The supernatant samples were stored at -20°C. A sample of each expression culture was analysed for protein expression using SDS-PAGE and western blotting using specific antisera. Example 4 - Large scale expression of VP2var and VP3 for immunisation Antigens as described above for use in the vaccines of the present invention may optionally be prepared as follows . i) For Mut + secreted expression (GS115/ pPICZaB/VP2var/Mut + ) : A single colony was used to inoculate 25ml of BMGY medium in a 250ml baffled flask. The culture was incubated at 28-30°C (250-300rpm) until the culture reached an OD 60 o = 2-6 (approximately 16-18h) . The overnight culture was used to inoculate 11 of BMGY in a 3 or 41 baffled flask and was grown at 28-30°C with vigorous shaking (250-300rpm) until the culture reaches an OD 50 o = 2-6. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500-3000 xg for 5 min at room temperature. Expression was induced by resuspending the pellet to an OD SO o = 1.0 (2-6 litres) in BMMY medium to start induction. The cultures were grown at 28-30 °C with shaking. 100% methanol was added to 0.5% every 24h until the optimum time of induction was reached. For GS115/ pPICZαB/VP2var/Mut + 1 the optimum time is 56h; for GS115/ pPICZαB /VP2var/Mut + 40 the optimum time is 32h; for GS115/ pPICZαB /VP2var/Mut + 34 the optimum time is 24h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500x g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was saved, chilled to +4 °C and filter sterilised. The expressed protein was stored in 1ml aliquots at -80 °C. ii) For Mut s secreted expression (GS115/ pPICZ B/VP3/Mut s ) : A single colony was used to inoculate 10ml of BMGY medium in a 100ml baffled flask. This was grown at 28-30°C (250-300rpm) until the culture reached an OD 6 oo = 2-6 (approximately 16-18h) . This overnight culture was used to inoculate 11 of BMGY in a 3 or 41 baffled flask and was grown at 28-30°C with vigorous shaking (250-300rpm) until the culture reaches an OD 60 o = 2-6. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500-3000 xg for 5 min at room temperature. Expression was induced by resuspending the cell pellet in 1/5 to 1/10 of the original culture volume in BMMY medium (approximately 100-200ml) . The culture was placed in a llitre baffled flask and returned to incubator at 28- 30 °C with shaking. 100% methanol was added to 0.5% every 24h until the optimum time of induction was reached. For GS115/ pPICZαB/VP3/Mut s 30.16 the optimum time is 72h; for GS115/ pPICZαB/VP3/Mut s 30.17 the optimum time is 48h; for GS115/ pPICZαB/VP3/Mut s 30.18 the optimum time is 48h; for GS115/ pPICZαB/VP3/Mut s 28 the optimum time is 72h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500-3000 x g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was saved, chilled to +4 °C and filter sterilised. The expressed protein was stored in 1ml aliquots at -80 °C. A sample of each filter sterilised recombinant protein was run through a 10% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie stained to check the induction. Example 5- IPN dose response in salmon Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, used in these experiments were reared at the Fish Cultivation Unit of the Marine Laboratory, Aultbea, Wester Ross, Scotland. Prior to all experimental procedures the fish were anaesthetised using ethyl-4-amino benzoate (Benzocaine, BDH Chemicals, Poole, Dorset, UK) . All experiments were carried out in one metre tanks containing 350 litres of fresh water, supplied with ca 10 litres per minute per tank. Fish were fed (Mainstream diets, BP Nutrition) daily to satiation. Immunisation . Five doses were used: 10, 35, 70, 100 and 150 μg of each VP2var and VP3 combined. The bivalent vaccine was diluted in PBS and mixed with the adjuvant (Montanide ISA 711®, Sepic) at a ratio of 30:70, respectively. Fish were i.p. injected with 0.1 ml vaccine containing 20, 70, 140, 200 and 300 μg bivalent vaccine. Fish i.p. injected with PBS plus adjuvant (ratio 30:70) were used as control. During the experimental period fish were kept at 7°C for 4 weeks and then transferred to 14°C. Groups are shown in Table 1: Dose per No. Fish fish Control 60 20 μg 59 70 μg 59 45 140 μg 55 200 μg 50 300 μg Table 1 Challenge . Before challenge 10 fish of each group were bled (except 140 μg/fish dose where 5 fish were bled) . Eleven weeks post-vaccination fish were split in three groups: 1. One group of fish were mtraperitoneally challenged with IPNV grown on CHSE-214 cells at a dose of 1.7 x 10 7 TCID 50 per fish. Blood samples were taken 4 and 10 weeks post-challenge. 2. The second group were administrated a two weeks course of oral boost vaccine. Blood samples were taken 4 and 10 weeks after the oral boost was finished. 3. The third group of fish was left untreated. Samples were taken lϊ and 24 weeks post-vaccination. Example 6 - IPNV enzyme-linked immunobsorbant assay (ELISA) Fish were immunised with bivalent vaccine (VP2var and VP3) as described in Example 5. IPNV PEG precipitated virus is diluted with 0.05 M carbonate- bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6, to give 5 x 10 7 TCID 50 /ml and used (100 μl) to coat individual wells (Immulon 4 HBX, Dynex Technologies Inc, USA) . The coated plates were incubated at 4°C for 48 h, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS- Tween) , blocked with 5% non fat dry milk in PBS-Tween for 1 h at 37°C, washed with PBS-Tween and stored at -80°C until used. All subsequent dilutions and washing between incubations were carried out in PBS-Tween. Salmon antisera were serially two-fold diluted (1:60 to 1:1920) and incubated in duplicate at 4°C overnight. A pool of sera from control fish was used as a negative control. A positive control was used in all plates. Incubation with PBS-Tween was used as a blank. After washing, Mouse anti-salmon Ig (4C10) diluted 1:8 was incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Horseradish peroxidase conjugate goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) diluted 1:1000 was incubated 1 h at room temperature. Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, Sigma) , 100 μl/well, was added as substrate and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Plates were read spectrophotometrically at 630 nm using an ELISA reader (DIAS, Dynatech Laboratories) . Example 7 - IPNV serum neutralisation assay The protective effect of vaccination with the IPNV subunit vaccine was verified using a neutralising antibody assay, as follows. Fish were immunised with bivalent vaccine (VP2var and VP3) as described in Example 5. Heat-inactivated serum samples from vaccinated fish were prepared by serial dilution in E-MEM + 2% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and mixed with live IPN virus in 96-well microplates to a final concentration of 500 TCID 50 per 100 μl well. Following incubation for 1 h at room temperature, 50 μl aliquots of these samples containing virus and plasma at appropriate concentrations were applied to wells containing confluent Chinook salmon embryo (CHSE-214) cells in 75 μl E-MEM +10 % FBS . Controls were prepared by substitution of pooled normal salmon serum or omission of virus as appropriate. All cultures were incubated for 7 days at 15 °C, and then virus induced cell lysis was determined by measurement of absorbance on the microplate-format spectrophotometer . The efficacy of the vaccine was demonstrated by the number of fish showing increased titres of antibody and neutralising antibodies (Figs 2-5, Tables 2-3) . Table 2 is shown hereinafter. Table 3a Table 3b Table 3 shows the number of fish whose antibodies neutralized IPNV in a neutralization assay. (3a) shows the details of the fish groups. The fish used were those who gave positive results in the ELISA tests. (3b) shows the results of the neutralization assays. The serum was taken from unchallenged fish 18 weeks after vaccination. Example 8 - further vaccine trials The above data were confirmed in further trials . These trials used the following: (1) An injection vaccine containing the two IPN proteins described above, an inactivant, a diluent, and the synthetic oil adjuvant Montanide ISA711 (AquaVac™ IPN - for injection) (2) An oral (booster) containing the two IPN proteins, a diluent, and an adjuvant carrier system which includes an oil and an emulsifier (AquaVac™ IPN Oral Vaccine) . (3) A multivalent injection vaccine containing the two IPN proteins, Aeromonas salmonicida antigens, an inactivant, a diluent, and the synthetic oil adjuvant Montanide ISA711 (AquaVac™ FNM PUS IPN Vaccine for injection). (4) A multivalent containing the IPN proteins, Aeromonas salmonicida and one or more Vibrio (including V. anguillarum, V. salmonicida and V. viscosus) antigens) , an inactivant, a diluent, plus the synthetic oil adjuvant Montanide ISA711. (AquaVac™ FV4-IPN for injection). The results are shown in Table 4 hereinafter. As can be seen from the Table, the vaccines according to the present invention, as produced in Pichia pastoris, were surprisingly efficacious. Considering ReflO, the vaccine showed considerably higher efficacy than Norvax (R) Compact 6 VAT (Intervet Norbio) which is based on rVP2 produced in E. coli . In related comparative studies, a VP2/VP3 vaccine produced in Pichia resulted in a greater proportion on fish which produced antibodies specific for IPNV than a comparable E. coli vaccine. Additionally, fish immunized with the Pichia-produced vaccine, and then challenged with IPN virus were able to clear the virus from their systems. This was not the case for the E. coli produced vaccine. References All references described herein, inasmuch as they may be employed by those skilled in the art to practice the invention, are hereby specifically incorporated herein by reference. Wolf, K., Snieszko, S.F., Dunbar, C.E. & Pyle, E. (1960). Virus nature of infectious pancreatic necrosis in trout. Proceedings of Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 104; 105-108. Pilcher. K.S. & Fryer, J.L. (1980). The viral disease of fish: a review through 1978. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 7: 287-364. Park, J.W. (1991) . Characteristics of Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus isolated from rainbow trout in Korea, Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University. Cohen, J., Poinsard, A. & Scherrer, R. (1973). Physioche ical and morphological features of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus. Journal of General Virology, 21: 485-98. Dobos, P. (1977) . Virus specific protein synthesis in cells infected with infectious pancreatic necrosis virus. Journal of Virology, 21: 242-258. Chang, N., MacDonald, R.D. & Yamamoto, T. (1978). Purification of infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN) virus and comparison of polypeptide composition of different isolates. Canadian Journal,. f Microbiology, 24: 19-27. MacDonald, R.D. & Dobos, P. (1981). Identification of proteins encoded by each genomic segment of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus. Virology, 114: 414-422. Persson, R.H. & MacDonald, R.D. (1982) . Evidence that infectious pancreatic necrosis virus has a genome linked protein. Journal of Virology, 44: 437-443. Dobos, P., Hill, B.J., Hallett, R., Kells, D.T.C., Becht, H. & Teninges, D. (1979). Biophysical and biochemical characterisation of five animal viruses with bisegmented double-stranded RNA genomes . Journal of Virology, 32: 593-605. Dobos, P. & Rowe, D. (1977). Peptide map comparison of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus- specific polypeptides. Journal of Virology, 24: 805-820. Sequence Annex Annex A - VP2 var amino acids 154-326 QDKVNNQ LVTKGVTVLN LPTGFDKPYV RLEDETPQGL QSMNGAKMRC TAAIAPRRYE IDLPSQRLPP VPATGTLTTL YEGNADIVNS TTVTGDINFS LAEQPANETK FDFQLDFMGL DNDVPVVTVV SSVLATNDNY RGVSAKMTQS IPTENITKPI TRVKLSYKIN Q Annex B - VP3 amino acids 1-23 i MASNASGMDE ELQRLLNATM ARAKEVQDAE IYKLLKLMAW TRKNDLTDHM YEWSKEDPDA LKFGKLISTP PKHPEKPKGP DQHHAQEARA TRISLDAVRA GADFATPEWV ALNNYRGPSP GQFKYYLITG REPEPGDEYE DYIKQPIVKP TDMNKIRRLA NSVYGLPHQE PAPEEFYDAV AAVFAQNGGR GPDQDQMQDL RELARQMKRR PRNADAPRRT RAPAEPAPPG RSRFTPSG Annex C - VP2var amino acids 167-352 TVLNLP TGFDKPYVRL EDETPQGLQS MNGAKMRCTA AIAPRRYEID LPSQRLPPVP ATGTLTTLYE GNADIVNSTT VTGDINFSLA EQPANETKFD FQLDFMGLDN DVPVVTVVSS VLATNDNYRG VSAKMTQSIP TENITKPITR VKLSYKINQQ TAIGNVATLG TMGPASVSFS SGNGN Annex D - VP3 amino acids 12-199 QRLLNA TMARAKEVQD AEIYKLLKLM AWTRKNDLTD HMYEWSKEDP DALKFGKLIS TPPKHPEKPK GPDQHHAQEA RATRISLDAV RAGADFATPE WVALNNYRGP SPGQFKYYLI TGREPEPGDE YEDYIKQPIV KPTDMNKIRR LANSVYGLPH QEPAPEEFYD AVAAVFAQNG GRGPDQDQMQ DLRELARQMK RRP Annex E - amino acids 12-238 (VP30 +163-352 (VP2var) QRLLNA TMARAKEVQD AEIYKLLKLM AWTRKNDLTD HMYEWSKEDP DALKFGKLIS TPPKHPEKPK GPDQHHAQEA RATRISLDAV RAGADFATPE WVALNNYRGP SPGQFKYYLI TGREPEPGDE YEDYIKQPIV KPTDMNKIRR LANSVYGLPH QEPAPEEFYD AVAAVFAQNG GRGPDQDQMQ DLRELARQMK RRPRNADAPR RTRAPAEPAP PGRSRFTPSG DSTVTVLNLP TGFDKPYVRL EDETPQGLQS MNGAKMRCTA AIAPRRYEID LPSQRLPPVP ATGTLTTLYE GNADIVNSTT VTGDINFSLA EQPANETKFD FQLDFMGLDN DVPVVTVVSS VLATNDNYRG VSAKMTQSIP TENITKPITR VKLSYKINQQ TAIGNVATLG TMGPASVSFS SGNGN Table 2 shows the number of challenged, boosted and untreated fish whose antibodies bound to immobilized IPNV in ELISA tests . CO c CD CO m CO --. m m *No. fish ELISA+ve/No. fish sampled (mean ELISA titre from positive fish) r σ. TABLE 4 - EFFICACY DATA FOR IPN VACCINES (1) AquaVac™ IPN - for injection (2) AquaVac™ IPN Oral (3) AquaVac™ FNM PLUS IPN -for injection (4) AquaVac™ FV4-IPN - for injection CO c CD CO -P- m o CO I m m c m r σ. Table 4 (cont) CO c CD CO m CO I m m 7 ) c m ro Table 4 (cont) CO c CD CO 4 m ro CO --. m m c m ro

Claims: Claims 1 A process for producinq a vaccine for use aqainst infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) in fish, which process comprises culturinq a yeast host cell which expresses an IPNV polypeptide, and formulatinq the polypeptide as a vaccine. 2 A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the yeast host cell is Pichia pastoris . 3 A process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the yeast host cell containinq the polypeptide is formulated as the vaccine. 4 A process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the expressed IPNV polypeptide is secreted from the host cell into the culture supernatant . 5 A process as claimed in claim 4 wherein host cells are separated from the supernatant, and the supernatant containinq secreted polypeptide is formulated as the vaccine. 6 A process as claimed in claim 4 or claim 5 wherein the polypeptide is secreted with a siqnal sequence which is the yeast α matinq factor siqnal sequence. 7 A process as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 6 wherein the polypeptide is partially purified from the supernatant prior to beinq formulated as a vaccine. 8 A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the vaccine is formulated by dilution with PBS. 9 A process as claimed in any one of the precedinq claims wherein the vaccine is formulated by addition of adjuvant. 10 A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims which comprises the steps of: (i) isolating a nucleic acid IPNV codinq region, (ii) preparing a recombinant DNA plasmid containinq the IPNV codinq region, (iii) preparing yeast cell lines expressing the IPNV polypeptide, (iv) screening for expression of the IPNV polypeptide in the cell lines . 11 A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein two different IPNV polypeptides are expressed in yeast host cells such as to produce a bivalent vaccine. 12 A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the IPNV polypeptides are encoded by multiple copies of the coding region of IPNV qenes ligated toqether to form a single open reading frame with a single initiation and termination codon to produce a multivalent IPNV antigen. 13 A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the IPNV polypeptides are expressed in different yeast host cells. 14 A process as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 13 wherein each IPNV polypeptide is present as two or more copies of antigen fused together in the correct orientation for expression as a single polypeptide such as to produce multimeric IPNV antiqens . 15 A process as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 14 wherein the IPNV polypeptides are derived from strain Sp. 16 A process as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 15 wherein the IPNV polypeptides are VP3 and VP2 or regions thereof. 17 A process as claimed in claim 16 wherein the IPNV polypeptides are VP3 and VP2var. 18 A process as claimed in claim 17 wherein nucleic acid encoding the IPNV codinq reqions is isolated usinq forward and reverse primer pairs specific for VP3 or VP2var. 19 A process as claimed in claim 18 wherein the primer pairs are selected from those of claim 53. 20 A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 19 wherein the or each IPN polypeptide is attached to a linker polypeptide adapted to link the polypeptide to a icroparticle . 21 A process as claimed in claim 20 wherein the linker polypeptide comprises a functional domain selected from: an acidic blob domain from an eukaryotic transcription factor; a histone protein polybasic domain. 22 A process as claimed in claim 20 or claim 21 further comprising the step of formulating the or each IPN polypeptide to render it suitable for administration by immersion or orally via incorporation into fish food by packaging it within a micro-particulate delivery system selected from: latex bead; poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres; atelocollagen minipellets; bentonite; or porous apatite ceramics . 23 A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims which further comprises the step of combininq the vaccine with other bacterial antigens to control other diseases . 24 A yeast expression vector for use in a method of any one of claims 1 to 23, which vector encodes one or both of the IPNV polypeptides VP3 and VP2var fused to a secretion signal sequence. 25 A vector as claimed in claim 24 which is produced from pPICZαB. 26 A yeast host cell containinq or transformed with the vector of claim 24 or claim 25. 27 A vaccine for use against IPNV in fish obtainable by any one of claims 1 to 22. 28 A vaccine as claimed in claim 27 consistinq essentially of an IPNV VP3 and VP2var polypeptides, wherein said vaccine is capable of inducing immunity in fish to the subsequent infection by the IPNV, said polypeptides having been produced in a yeast host by an expression vector compatible with the host, the expression vectors including an inserted DNA sequence from IPNV viral DNA coding for the IPNV polypeptide in the vaccine. 29 A vaccine for use against IPNV in fish, which vaccine consists essentially of the IPNV polypeptides VP3 and VP2var optionally fused to a yeast secretion signal sequence. 30 A vaccine as claimed in claim 28 or claim 29 wherein the VP3 and VP2var sequences are shown in Annex A and Annex C. 31 A vaccine as claimed in claim 28 or claim 29 wherein the VP3 and VP2var sequences are shown in Annex B and Annex D. 32 A vaccine as claimed in claim 28 or claim 29 wherein the VP3 and VP2var sequences are shown in Annex E. 33 A vaccine as claimed in any one of claims 27 to 32 comprisinq a pharmacologically acceptable diluent or adjuvant or combination of these . 34 A vaccine as claimed in claim 33 which is an aqueous suspension for use as an immersion vaccine. 35 A vaccine as claimed in claim 33 which is an oral vaccine comprising fish oil and a lecithin carrier. 36 A vaccine as claimed in claim 33 which is an injection vaccine comprisinq Montanide ISA711®. 37 A vaccine as claimed in any one of the precedinq claims in dosaqe unit form wherein each dosage unity comprises about 100 μg of the or each IPNV polypeptide. 38 A vaccine composition comprising a vaccine as claimed in any one of the precedinq claims and other bacterial antigens used to control other diseases. 39 A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 38 wherein the antigens to other fish diseases are derived from Aeromonas salmonicida . 40 A vaccine composition as claimed in claim 38 or claim 39 wherein the antigens to other fish diseases are one or more Vibrio antigens derived from any of V. anguillarum, V. salmonicida and V. viscosus . 41 An IPNV vaccine which is a vaccine or vaccine composition as claimed in any one of claims 27 to 40 for use in a method of therapeutic treatment, or prophylaxis, of IPNV in a fish. 42 A method of therapeutic treatment or prophylaxis of IPNV, comprising administering a dose of the IPNV vaccine of claim 41 to a fish. 43 A method for immunizing fish against IPNV, the method comprisinq administering to susceptible fish a vaccine comprised of an IPNV vaccine consisting essentially VP3 and VP2var polypeptides, the vaccine being administered in a dose sufficient to induce immunity to subsequent infection by IPNV, wherein said polypeptides have been produced in a yeast host by expression vectors compatible with the host, the expression vectors including an inserted DNA sequence from IPNV viral DNA codinq for the IPNV polypeptide in the vaccine. 44 A method as claimed in claim 42 or claim 43 which is preceded by providing a vaccine by a process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 23. 45 A method as claimed in any one of claims 42 to 44 wherein the fish is Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) . 46 A method as claimed in any one of claims 42 to 45 wherein the treatment or prophylaxis is against IPNV strain SPl. 47 A method as claimed in any one of claims 42 to 46 wherein the dose ranges from 50 to 150 μg antigen per fish, more preferably 70 to 125 μg per fish, most preferably about lOOμg per fish. 48 A method as claimed in any one of claims 42 to 47 wherein the IPNV vaccine is administered orally as an emulsion added to fish feed pellets and fed over a 10 day feeding period to deliver an equivalent of 100 μl of vaccine. 49 A method as claimed in any one of claims 42 to 47 wherein the IPNV vaccine is administered by direct addition of vaccine to the water in which the fish swim. 50 A method as claimed in any one of claim 48 or claim 49 wherein the IPNV vaccine is administered as microparticles. 51 A method as claimed in any one of claims 42 or claim 50 wherein the IPNV vaccine is administered in combination with treatments for other fish diseases, either simultaneously or sequentially. 52 A method as claimed in any one of claim 42 or claim 51 wherein the IPNV vaccine is administered as an initial dose and a boost dose. 53 A nucleotide primer selected from: CTA ACA ACG GAA TTC ATG GAC AAA GTC VP2var forward primer (SEQ ID. NO. 1) gaagctgcagaggacaaagtcaac3 VP2var forward (SEQ ID. NO. 2) CGT TGC CGA TTG GCG GCC GCT GGT TGA TC VP2var reverse primer (SEQ ID. NO. 3) accactgcagtcacagtcctgaatc3' VP2var forward (SEQ ID. NO. 4) gagcgcqgccgccgcaattccgttccctg3' VP2var reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 5) CCT GGG ACT GCA GAT GGC ATC AAA TG VP3 forward primer (SEQ ID. NO. 6) GTT ACA CCG CGG CCG CGT CTC CGC TGG G VP3 reverse primer (SEQ ID. NO. 7) gacgctgcagtqcaacgcctcctq VP3 forward (SEQ ID. NO. 8) qtqcagcggccgccggqggtcgtcqtttcatc VP3reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 9) gacgctgcaqtqcaacqcctcctq VP3 forward (SEQ ID. NO. 10) ctctctaqaqtctccgctggg VP3 reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 11) ccctcagaqtcacaqtcctq VP2var forward (SEQ ID. NO. 12) qaqcgcggccgccgcaattccgttccctg VP2var reverse (SEQ ID. NO. 13) 54 A vaccine or vaccine composition substantially as described herein with reference to Example 8.

Inventors: BREEMAN SUZANNE, LABUS MARIE BEAGLEY, MELVIN WILLIAM THOMAS, BREEMAN, SUZANNE, LABUS, MARIE, BEAGLEY, MELVIN, WILLIAM, THOMAS
Applicants: BREEMAN SUZANNE, LABUS MARIE BEAGLEY, MELVIN WILLIAM THOMAS, UNIV ABERDEEN, BREEMAN, SUZANNE, LABUS, MARIE, BEAGLEY, MELVIN, WILLIAM, THOMAS, THE UNIVERSITY COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
Application year: 2001
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: A61P31, C07K14, C12N1, C12N15