LOGIC METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TEXTUALLY DISPLAYING AN ORIGINAL FLIGHT PLAN AND A MODIFIED FLIGHT PLAN SIMULTANEOUSLY

Abstract: A method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan includes displaying a texlist of waypoints, copying waypoints from the original flight plan into the modified flight plan, comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan, determining, in a first determining step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoing originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan, and adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan. The method may also include determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan, when it is determine in the first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypoing to the textlist, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan.

Description: TITLE LOGIC METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TEXTUALLY DISPLAYING AN ORIGINAL FLIGHT PLAN AND A MODIFIED FLIGHT PLAN SIMULTANEOUSLY BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to aircraft navigation. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved aircraft navigation system and method for textually displaying an original flight plan and a modified flight plan simultaneously. 2. Description of the Related Art Conventional flight planning systems provide a graphical representation of an active flight plan on a graphical display and a textual representation of the active flight plan on a separate Control Display Unit (CDU). The flight plan displayed on the CDU includes route information listing the waypoints and showing performance data, such as constraints and performance parameters, for each. The constraints include descent angle, speed, altitude, time, etc., and the performance parameters include course and distance information, expected time of arrival, fuel remaining, winds aloft, groundspeed, etc. The graphical display shows the active flight plan in two dimensions with the waypoints connected by a line showing the active flight route. For example, Figure 1 shows a graphical display with the waypoints ABC, LL01, and LL03 connected by the active flight route 202. The active flight plan can be modified by adding or deleting waypoints by interfacing with the CDU using a keyboard or by interfacing with the graphical display using a cursor control device. The graphical display is capable of showing the active flight plan and the modified flight plan in graphical form. For example, Figure 2 shows a graphical display with an active flight plan 202 including the waypoints GUP, GUP44, and ABC and a modified flight plan 204 direct from the aircraft's present position (PPOS) to ABC. A solid line represents the active flight plan, and a dashed line represents the modified flight plan. However, once modifications are made to the active flight plan, either textually or graphically, conventional systems and methods display only a modified flight plan on the CDU, and a comparison of the constraints and performance parameters for the active and modified flight plans is not possible. When only the modified flight plan is displayed, the performance data for the active flight plan is no longer available or even easily discernable. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,715,163 relates to a cursor controlled navigation system for aircraft in which a flight plan can be modified by adding waypoints to either a graphical display or a CDU. However, when the desired (i.e., modified) flight plan returns to the original flight plan, waypoints that are not on the desired flight plan are deleted. With this system, it is not possible to provide a simultaneous display of the original and modified flight plans. A comparison of the constraints and performance parameters of both the modified and original flight plans therefore cannot be done. There is a need, therefore, for an improved navigation system that simultaneously, textually presents the original and modified flight plans, including constraints and performance parameters, on a single display. Improvements for inputting modified flight plans are also desirable. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is a general object of the present invention to provide an improved navigational flight planning system. It is another object of the present invention to provide a logic method and apparatus for simultaneously, textually displaying the original and modified flight plans of a navigational system, allowing comparison of the performance data of each flight plan. In accordance with the objects described above, one aspect of the present invention relates to a method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan and includes displaying a textlist of waypoints on the modified flight plan and on the original flight plan, modifying the textlist by indicating an insertion point in the textlist to insert a proposed waypoint, determining whether the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, and, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is not a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a first adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point. In the determining step, the textlist is searched forward from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. The method may also include, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist after the proposed waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint; or, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist from the insertion point to the waypoint prior to the duplicate waypoint. Alternatively, in the determining step, the original flight plan is searched backwards from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, and, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, the method may include adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist before the proposed waypoint back to and including the duplicate waypoint. Another aspect of the present invention relates to a method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan and includes displaying a textlist of waypoints; copying waypoints from the original flight plan into the modified flight plan; comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan; determining, in a first determining step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan. The method may also include determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan, when it is determined in the first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan; and, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan does not correspond to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan, designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints from a corresponding position of the waypoint in the original flight plan to an actual position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan. Still another aspect of the present invention relates to computer executable code for implementing a method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, the code being for executing the steps including displaying a textlist of waypoints on the modified flight plan and on the original flight plan; modifying the textlist by indicating an insertion point in the textlist to insert a proposed waypoint; determining whether the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist; and, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is not a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a first adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point. In the determining step, the textlist is searched forward from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. The code may be for further executing the steps of, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point; and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist after the proposed waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint. When it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, the code may be for the step of designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist from the insertion point to the waypoint prior to the duplicate waypoint. Alternatively, in the determining step, the original flight plan is searched backwards from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, and the code is for further executing the step of, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist before the proposed waypoint back to and including the duplicate waypoint. Yet another aspect of the present invention relates to. computer executable code for implementing a method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, the code being for executing the steps including displaying a textlist of waypoints; copying waypoints from the original flight plan into the modified flight plan; comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan; determining, in a first determining step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan. The code may be for further executing the steps of, when it is determined in the first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan, determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan; and adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. The code may also be for further executing the step of designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints from a corresponding position of the waypoint in the original flight plan to an actual position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan does not correspond to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. Still another aspect of the present invention relates to an apparatus for simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan and includes a display device and a processor. The processor performs the steps of displaying on the display device a textlist of waypoints on the modified flight plan and on the original flight plan; modifying the textlist by indicating an insertion point in the textlist to insert a proposed waypoint; determining whether the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist; and, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is not a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a first adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point. In the determining step, the textlist is searched forward from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. The processor may also perform the steps of, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point; and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist after the proposed waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint. When it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, the processor may perform the step of designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist from the insertion point to the waypoint prior to the duplicate waypoint. Alternatively, in the determining step, the original flight plan is searched backwards from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, and the processor performs the steps of, when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point; and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist before the proposed waypoint back to and including the duplicate waypoint. Yet another aspect of the present invention relates to an apparatus for simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan and includes a display device, and a processor. The processor performs the steps of displaying on the display device a textlist of waypoints; copying waypoints from the original flight plan into the modified flight plan; comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan; determining, in a first determining step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and, when it is determined in the determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan, adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist. The processor may also perform the steps of, when it is determined in the first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan, determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypomt in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan; adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan; and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints from a corresponding position of the waypoint in the original flight plan to an actual position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan does not correspond to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, read in conjunction with, and reference to, the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a graphical display of an original flight plan; Figure 2 is a graphical display showing a modified flight plan and an original flight plan; Figure 3 is a block diagram showing typical components of a navigational system; Figure 4 is a combined graphical and textual display according to an embodiment of the present invention, showing an original flight plan; Figure 5 is a combined graphical and textual display according to an embodiment of the present invention, showing options for changing the original flight plan; Figure 6 is a combined graphical and textual display according to an embodiment of the present invention, showing initial modifications to the original flight plan; Figure 7 is a combined graphical and textual display according to an embodiment of the present invention, showing the original and modified flight plans; Figure 8 is a combined graphical and textual display according to an embodiment of the present invention, showing the new flight plan; Figure 9 is flowchart showing logic for simultaneously displaying the original and modified flight plans according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 10 is a flowchart showing logic for simultaneously displaying the original and modified flight plans according to another embodiment of the present invention; Figure 11 is a flowchart showing logic for simultaneously displaying the original and modified flight plans according to yet another embodiment of the present invention; and Figure 12 shows an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, and a textlist built from the flight plans. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention solves the problems of the conventional systems by displaying a textlist that simultaneously presents both an original flight plan and a modified flight plan. Performance data, such as constraints and performance parameters, for both flight plans may then be compared prior to activating the modified flight plan. Each of the elements shown in block outline in Figure 3 is well known, per se, and a specific type of construction of each is not critical to carrying out the invention or to a disclosure of the best mode for carrying out the invention. Figure 3 is a block diagram showing components of a navigational system for use with the present invention. The system includes a CPU 302 that interfaces with the navigational system and other systems on the aircraft. The CPU 302 may be a flight management computer or an area navigator. The CPU 302 includes logic for the navigational system for textually and/or graphically displaying flight plans on a textual display 304 and a graphical display 306, respectively. Interface devices, such as a keyboard 308 and a cursor control device 310, allow a user to interface with the CPU 302 to operate the navigational system. The CPU 302 may also operate the flight control system 312 based on inputs from the logic of the navigational system. Alternatively, the outputs from the CPU 302 can be sent to a display that shows the lateral and vertical deviations from the desired lateral and vertical path. The pilot can then hand fly the aircraft following the deviations, without an autopilot or flight director. Yet another implementation is to send outputs from the CPU 302 to a flight director. The flight director then provides steering cues or commands for the pilot to follow. The steering cues or commands keep the aircraft on the CPU's defined lateral and vertical path. The present invention does not require the use of a graphical display. The present invention applies to the simultaneous textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan. However, it is preferred to provide the textual display 304 in conjunction with the graphical display 306, for example, a CDU and a graphical display. It is more preferred to combine the textual display 304 and the graphical display 306 on a single screen, for example, a computer monitor, to provide all relevant information in a single location. Operation of an embodiment of the navigational system according to the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures 4-8, where like reference numbers represent the same features. Figure 4 shows a graphical display 402 and a textual display 404 combined in a single navigational display 400, such as a computer generated display on a computer monitor. The graphical display 402 shows the original, or active, flight plan 418 as a solid line connecting the PPOS 422 of the aircraft to waypoints LL07, INW, GCN, PGS, BLD, KLAS, BTY, BIH, and FRA, and the aircraft is currently flying direct to waypoint LL07. The graphical display 402 shows only a portion of the flight plan; therefore, waypoints after FRA are not shown, as they are not located within the viewing area. The textual display 404 lists the waypoints of the original flight plan, as well as corresponding constraints and performance parameters for each. The route type controller 416 indicates that the active flight plan is currently being displayed. The textual display 404 also shows that the aircraft is currently flying direct to waypoint LL07, as listed in the first two boxes of the textual display 404, and then to the remaining waypoints in the order listed. The data listed for each waypoint shows the course and distance from that waypoint to the next. Initially, the course and distance from PPOS 422 to LL07 are 008° and 22.8 nautical miles, respectively. The data also shows that the Expected Time of Arrival (ETA) at LL07 is 1516Z, that the waypoint will be crossed at an altitude of 9999 (i.e., 10,000) feet, and the fuel remaining at LL07 is 24,738 pounds. As shown, for example from INW to GCN, the display also provides the amount of fuel required for each leg, which is 945 pounds in this example. The textual display 404 is also capable of displaying airspeed constraints/predictions (Spd) and vertical path descent angles (Ang) for crossing each waypoint. The present invention is not limited to displaying only the constraints and performance parameters shown in Figure 4, and additional information for the flight route may be displayed, for example, groundspeed and true airspeed, leg distance and distance to go (DTG) to destination, leg time and time remaining to destination, and predicted wind and temperature for each waypoint in the flight plan. The embodiment shown in Figure 4 includes a button 406, which allows cycling between different sets of displayed information. For example, the current display shows the fuel for each leg and the fuel remaining at each waypoint, but if the button 406 is selected with a cursor, then other information may be displayed. The portion of the original flight plan of interest in Figure 4 consists' of flying from INW direct GCN direct PGS direct BLD direct KLAS and then as filed. It is desired to modify the original flight plan to fly direct from INW to KLAS,* which will remove the waypoints GCN, PGS, and BLD from the original flight plan. To begin the modification process, waypoint INW is selected with the cursor 414, and the "Amend Route" task is selected from the task menu 424 (Figure 5). Then, as shown in Figure 6, the textual display 404 indicates "Pending" in the route type controller 416, indicating that modifications to the flight plan are in progress. At this time, the cursor 414 is used to designate the route modification, as shown by the dashed line 408 proceeding west from INW. The dashed line 408 represents movement of the cursor 414 from INW towards KLAS, and KLAS is selected with the cursor 414. Additionally, "Activate/Cancel" buttons 410 appear at the bottom of the graphical display 402 and the textual display 404. If Activate is selected with the cursor 414, then the route modification is accepted, and if Cancel is selected with the cursor 414, then the Amend Route process is canceled. Furthermore, the textual display 404 now contains a small dialog box 412, which allows the operator to type in the next waypoint, rather than pointing to it graphically with the cursor 414. When KLAS is selected with the cursor 414, the graphical display 402 then shows both the original flight plan 418 and the modified, or pending, flight plan 420, as shown in Figure 7. Additionally, the textual display 404 provides a simultaneous, textual representation of both flight plans. Looking at the far left column of the textual display 404, it can be seen that the modified flight plan consists of INW direct KLAS and then as filed. The waypoints proposed to be removed from the flight plan (GCN, PGS, and BLD) are shown vertically on the waypoint list between INW and KLAS, as originally included on the original plan. Because those waypoints are not on the modified flight plan, they are designated to be removed. In this embodiment, those waypoints are displayed "grayed out" and with a "\" placed over their identifiers, and the data associated with those waypoints is removed. The textual display 404 in Figure 7 is displaying the fuel predictions (fuel for each leg and the fuel remaining) of both the original and modified flight plans for each common waypoint that is on both flight plans. The original flight plan uel predictions (leg and remaining) for each waypoint are displayed on the top half of the box, and the modified flight plan fuel predictions are displayed under the original flight plan fuel predictions. For example, the fuel remaining at KLAS for the original flight plan is 21,289 pounds, and the fuel remaining at KLAS for the modified flight plan is 21,481 pounds. In this embodiment, the modified flight plan fuel predictions are displayed using the same color as the modified flight plan 420. The present invention is not limited to a comparison of fuel predictions between the original and modified flight plans. Rather, it encompasses any simultaneous, textual display of original and modified flight plans, ranging from only a comparison list of waypoint identifiers to a comparison of all constraints and performance parameters. For example, simultaneous presentation of both routes can allow comparison of ETAs, speed, distance, time, etc. Additionally, the present invention provides performance data for waypoints that are added to the modified flight plan. Upon selecting Activate with the cursor 414 from the Activate/Cancel button 410 in either the graphical display 402 or the textual display 404, the modified flight plan becomes the new flight plan 426, as shown in Figure 8. The waypoints that are not on the new flight plan are removed from the graphical display 402 and the textual display 404, leaving only the waypoints that remain on the new flight plan. The route type controller 416 indicates that an active flight plan is displayed, and the solid line 426 represents the new flight plan. The simultaneous display of the waypoints on both the original and modified flight plans, as well as the constraints and performance parameters for both, allows the operator to compare the data from each route and make an informed decision before activating the modified flight plan. The textual display may also have the feature of an option to list only the waypoints on the modified flight plan, i.e., without listing the waypoints marked for removal. The constraints and performance data for both flight plans are still simultaneously displayed, and the waypoints marked for removal are not removed from the original flight plan until the modified flight plan is activated. The present invention is not limited to operation of the route type controller 416 as described above. For example, Figures 6 and 7 indicate "Pending" in the route type controller 416. However, a preferred method is for the route type controller 416 to indicate "Active" during the modification process, because the active and pending flight plans are displayed simultaneously. The route type controller can be used to display different types of flight plans on the navigational display 400 (e.g., a secondary flight plan) and is not limited to showing only the active flight plan. The present invention is not limited to amending an original flight plan as discussed above. Rather, it encompasses any changes to the original flight plan where the original flight plan and the modified flight plan are simultaneously, textually displayed. The logic required to create a textlist of waypoints that allows simultaneously comparing two flight plans will now be described with reference to Figures 9, 10, and 11. As previously discussed, the two flight plans are the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. The modified flight plan is a copy of the original flight plan that is being edited. In a first method, any operations performed on the modified flight plan are also requested in the waypoint textlist of the textual display. As the modified flight plan is edited to diverge from the original flight plan, waypoints that are to be removed from the original flight plan are retained on the textlist, but they are shown in a non-original manner, e.g., grayed out. For waypoints that are common between the two flight plans, and for added waypoints, the constraints and performance parameters are displayed next to each other for comparison. Options for editing a flight plan include, but are not limited to, skipping waypoints, inserting a single waypoint, inserting a series of waypoints, such as stored flight plans, procedures, and airways, etc., or a combination of the above. When adding a new waypoint, for example, the flight plan is searched forward from the point of insertion. If a duplicate of the new waypoint is found, then all the waypoints from just past the new waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint will be marked as "removed." The logic for applying this method of "folding forward" the textlist is shown in Fig. 9. This logic assures that only the newly added waypoints and waypoints from the original flight plan are presented in the textlist. In Step S502 of Figure 9, the user requests inserting a waypoint at Position X (Pos x ) in the flight plan through either inputs to the graphical display or the textual display. In Step S504, it is determined if the new waypoint is a duplicate of an existing waypoint in the textlist after Pos x . If it is not a duplicate, then the new waypoint is inserted in the textlist and is marked as "added," Step S506, and the process returns to Step S502, where another waypoint may be added. If the new waypoint is a duplicate of another waypoint following Pos x , for example, at Pos y , then in Step S508, it is determined if the duplicate waypoint at Pos y is marked as removed. It would be marked as removed if, for example, it was identified to be removed prior to adding the new waypoint. If the duplicate waypoint at Pos y is marked as removed, then the new waypoint is added to the textlist in Step S510, it is marked as "added," and the process then returns to Step S502, where another waypoint may be added. If the duplicate waypoint at Pos y is not marked as removed, then the process proceeds to Step S512, where the new waypoint is added at Pos x and each waypoint after Pos x up to Pos y (i.e., POS X - H to Pos y ) is either removed or marked as "removed." The waypoint is removed from the textlist if it was already marked as "added," for example, from Step S506 or Step S510. Otherwise, the waypoint is marked as "removed." The textlist of the modified flight plan then includes all waypoints from the original flight plan and all added waypoints, with waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan designated accordingly. For waypoints on the modified flight plan that are common with the original flight plan, a simultaneous display of the constraints and performance parameters of the common waypoint on each flight plan is then provided. When an edit is closed by selecting a duplicate waypoint that is at a later position in the flight plan, that waypoint is inserted so that it shows up twice in the list, which preserves the constraints and performance parameters at both the beginning and the end of the section to be removed. However, on the textual display, the duplicate waypoint is preferably only listed once. In Step S512, the logic may alternatively not insert the waypoint at Pos x and may then process waypoints from Pos x up to Pos y-1 . If the waypoint is marked as added, then it is removed from the list. Otherwise, it is marked as "removed," so that waypoints from Pos x to PoSy-i are designated as "removed." An example of adding waypoints to an original flight plan will now be described, with new waypoints shown as underlined: The original flight plan includes waypoints A B C D E F. A modification is initiated at waypoint B. Waypoint G is added after waypoint B, Step S502. Waypoint G is not a duplicate, Step S504, so it is added to the modified flight plan, Step S506. The textlist now looks like: AB G C D E F. Waypoint H is added, Step S502. Waypoint H is not a duplicate, Step S504, so it is added to the modified flight plan, Step S506. The textlist now looks like: A B G H C D E F The modification is closed at waypoint E, by designating waypoint E as the next waypoint after waypoint H (i.e., the modified flight plan returns to the original flight plan by adding waypoint E). Waypoint E is a duplicate, Step S504, and is not marked as "removed," Step S508; therefore, waypoint E is added to the modified flight plan, and waypoints at Pos x+1 to Pos y are marked to be removed, Step S512. The textlist now looks like: A B G H E C D E F. (Or, alternatively, the textlist looks like: A B G ΗJHW-E F) The textlist includes the waypoints shown above and allows comparison of the performance data for the modified and original flight plans. Performance data for added waypoints is also provided. Once the modified flight plan is activated to become the new flight plan, waypoints C, D, and original E (if first alternative) are removed, and the textlist then includes waypoints A B G H E F. Another example of the logic will be discussed with reference to Figures 4 to 9. In Figure 4, the original flight plan is shown and includes waypoints LL07, INW, GCN, PGS, BLD, KLAS, BTY, BIH, FRA, and then as filed. In Figure 5, the user initiates a modification to the original flight plan by selecting INW with the cursor 414 and then selecting "amend route" from the menu 424. In Figure 6, the user moves the cursor 414 to add KLAS as the next waypoint on the modified flight plan after INW, i.e., at Pos x . This action corresponds to Step S 502 in Figure 9. KLAS is a duplicate of a waypoint at Pos y on the original flight plan, Step S504, and the waypoint at Pos y is not marked "removed," Step S508. Using the alternative procedure for Step S512 described above, when the edit process is closed, the waypoints from Pos x to Pos y -i are marked as "removed." The textlist of the logic now includes INW, GCN, PGS, BLB, KLAS, BTY, BIH, FRA, and then as filed. As shown in Figure 7, the textual display 404 shows the waypoints listed above, with waypoints GCN, PGS, and BLD designated to be removed. Textual display 404 also provides a comparison of the modified and original flight plans by displaying the constraints and performance parameters for common and added waypoints. Additionally, the graphical display 402 displays both the original flight plan 418 and the modified flight plan 420. When the modified flight plan is activated to become the new flight plan 426, waypoints GCN, PGS, and BLD are removed from the textual display 404 and the graphical display 402 (Figure 8). Logic of "folding back" may also be used for adding a series of waypoints. The "folding back" logic is shown in Figure 10 and operates substantially the same as the logic of Figure 9, with like steps being designated by the same reference number. A detailed discussion of the like steps is omitted. The difference in the "folding back" logic is that it looks back up the flight plan to find a duplicate of the first waypoint in a series of newly inserted waypoints (e.g. an arrival), Step S604. If a duplicate is found, for example, at Pos y , then the waypoints will be marked as "removed" from Pos y to Pos x -^ Step S612. The logic of Figures 9 and 10 is also used in other flight plan operations when inserting a procedure in a single operation of Step S502, for example, when adding a terminal procedure. The flight plan will be searched forward from the last waypoint or backwards from the first waypoint that is entered in the series. A procedure is a series of waypoints that can be handled as a group. Whenever a procedure is selected in the modified flight plan, the old modified waypoints for the selected procedure will be removed and the new ones will be added. If the waypoints were part of the original flight plan procedure, they will be retained and marked as "removed." If there are "removed" waypoints already representing the new procedure, then the "removed" designation will be cleared. When representing a procedure that is marked as "removed," it can be represented in the textlist by its name, e.g., ILS.PBF t or as the series of waypoints that make up the procedure section. An example of using the folding back logic to add a series of waypoints to an original flight plan will now be described, with new waypoints shown as underlined: The original flight plan includes waypoints A B C D E F. A modification is initiated to add an approach following waypoint F. The approach includes waypoints C G H. The approach C G H is added after the last waypoint F, Step S502. An interim textlist of the logic includes waypoints A B C D E F C G H. The first waypoint in the approach (C) is a duplicate of a previous waypoint at Pos y , Step S604, that is not marked as "removed," Step S508. The waypoints from Pos y to Pos x-1 are marked as "removed," Step S612. The textlist of the logic now looks like: A B C D E F C G H. The textlist includes the waypoints shown above and allows comparison of the performance data for the modified and original flight plans. Once the modified flight plan is activated to become the new flight plan, waypoints C, D, E, and F are removed, and the textlist then includes waypoints A B C G H. The Logic of Figures 9 and 10 can also be adapted for a modified flight plan that only removes waypoints. For example, if the original flight plan includes waypoints A B C D and waypoint C is selected to be removed, then, as in Step S512, waypoint C would be marked as removed. The modified textlist would then show waypoints AB C D and would allow comparison of the original flight plan and modified flight plan constraints and performance data. The same operation would apply if several waypoints were being removed, for example, if it is desired to bypass several waypoints by flying direct to a waypoint in the flight plan. The preferred method for producing the textlist is to merge two flight plans, such as the original and modified flight plans, to form the textlist. Any waypoints in the original flight plan that are not in the modified flight plan will be marked "removed" in the textlist, and any waypoints that are new in the modified flight plan and not in the original flight plan will be marked as "added." In the preferred method, the textlist is rebuilt after each edit operation such as a waypoint or procedure insertion. The logic produces a textlist that shows waypoints that have been "added" in the modified flight plan, as well as waypoints that are "removed" from the original flight plan. The constraints and performance data for the two flight plans can then be simultaneously displayed and compared. When a flight plan change is initiated on the original flight plan, the original flight plan is copied into the modified flight plan. Each modified waypoint is assigned a new ID and a CopylD. A CopylD is a copy of the original flight plan's waypoint ID from which the modified waypoint was copied. The use of a CopylD allows identification of the location of the waypoint in the original flight plan, even if the waypoint occurs more than once in the flight plan. By mapping one flight plan into the other in this way, the textlist can be correctly built because it can be determined exactly which waypoints are "removed" from the original flight plan and which have been "added" to the modified flight plan. Figure 11 shows the logic for merging the original and modified flight plans into a textlist. An "index" is the position of a waypoint in a flight plan. The Originallndex and the Modifiedlndex correspond to the position where a waypoint action is currently being processed in the original and modified flight plans, respectively. The Wpt Mod i f iedi ndex is the waypoint in the modified flight plan located at the modified index. The Matchlndex is the location in the original flight plan where the Wpt odi f i ed inde x is found by searching forward from the Originallndex. At the Matchlndex, the CopylD of the Wpt Mo di f i ed inde x in the modified flight plan equals the ID of the WptMatcMndex in the original flight plan. Initially, in Step S702, the Matchlndex, Originallndex, and Modifiedlndex equal zero. In Step S704, the WptModifiedindex, i.e., the waypoint located at the position Modifiedlndex, is obtained from the modified flight plan. In Step S706, it is determined if the Wpt Mod ifi ed i nd ex has a valid CopylD, i.e., whether it was copied from the original flight plan. If it does not have a valid CopylD, then it has been "added" to the modified flight plan, and it is added directly to the textlist, Step S708. If there is a Copy-LD, then the process proceeds to Step S710, where the original flight plan is searched to find the location of the matching waypoint. The search of the original flight plan begins at the Wptoπgi na ii n e x and searches forward until the location of the matching waypoint is found (i.e., the Matchlndex is found). The process then proceeds to Step S712, where it is determined if the Matchlndex equals the Originallndex (i.e., whether the location of the matching waypoint is in the same relative location in both the original and modified flight plans). If yes, then the waypoint is added to the textlist, and the Originallndex is incremented by one, Step S716. The process then proceeds to Step S 718, where the Modifiedlndex is incremented by one. If the answer in Step S712 is no, then there are waypoints in the original flight plan from the Originallndex down to the matching waypoint. These waypoints are added to the textlist and marked as "removed," Step S714. Also in Step S714, the matching waypoint (WptModifiedindex) is added to the textlist, and the Originallndex is set to equal the Modifiedlndex plus one. The process then proceeds to Step S718, where the Modifiedlndex is incremented by one. In Step S720, it is determined whether there are any waypoints left in the modified flight plan to process. If so, then the process returns to Step S704 to analyze the next waypoint in the modified flight plan. If not, then the process proceeds to Step S722, where all remaining waypoints in the original flight'plan are added to the textlist and are marked as "removed." In Step S724, the process returns to Step S702 to wait the beginning of a new merge process. In the process described above, each waypoint in the modified flight plan is compared to the original flight plan. After each comparison, the textlist is rebuilt to show the common waypoints on both flight plans, waypoints on the original flight plan that are designated to be removed, and additional waypoints that are only on the modified flight plan. Comparison data can then be provided for the common waypoints, and data for the added waypoints can also be provided. This logic applies both to simple waypoint editing as well as to procedure waypoints inserted as a series. Procedure section names can be compared to determine if procedure sections have been changed. This can be used to display a removed procedure as a section name, e.g., ILSPBF, rather than as a series of "removed" waypoints. An example of the logic of Figure 11 will now be described with reference to Figure 12. As shown in Figure 12, an original flight plan includes waypoints LL07, INW, GCN, PGS, BLD, KLAS, BTY, BIH, FRA, HYP, MOD, and KSFO. When an edit is initiated, each waypoint is copied into the modified flight plan and is assigned a CopylD corresponding to its original flight plan counterpart (Figure 12 indicates which waypoints from the modified flight plan have a CopylD). The modified flight plan shown in Figure 12 includes waypoints LL07, INW, KLAS, ABC, BTY, BIH, FRA, and HYP. Figure 12 also shows the position of the waypoints in the original and modified flight plans, which correspond to the Originallndex position and Modifiedlndex position, respectively. After each edit to the modified flight plan, the logic of Figure 11 is used to rebuild the textlist. This example will describe rebuilding the textlist from the complete modified flight plan shown in Figure 12. To rebuild the textlist from the flight plans shown in Figure 12, the following steps are performed. In Step S702, the process starts at index position 0 in the original and modified flight plans. In Step S704, the first waypoint LL07 at position Modifiedlndex 0 is obtained from the modified flight plan. In Step S706, it is determined that LL07 has a CopylD, indicating that it originated from the original flight plan (i.e., LL07 has a matching waypoint in the original flight plan). The process proceeds to Step S710 to obtain the Matchlndex, which corresponds to the position of the matching waypoint in the original flight plan. The Matchlndex for LL07 in the original flight plan is 0, because LL07 is located at index position 0. The Originallndex for LL07 is also 0, as mentioned earlier. In Step S712, it is determined that the Matchlndex equals the Originallndex, and the process proceeds to Step S716, where waypoint LL07 is added to the textlist, and the Originallndex is incremented to position 1. In Step S718, the Modifiedlndex is incremented to position 1. In Step S720, it is determined that all waypoints in the modified flight plan have not been processed, and the process returns to Step S704. In Step S704, the next waypoint in the modified flight plan is obtained, i.e., the waypoint INW at Modifiedlndex 1 is obtained. The process for INW is identical to that of LL07, and a detailed discussion is omitted. After the Originallndex and Modifiedlndex have been incremented to position 2, the process again returns to Step S704, where KLAS is obtained from the modified flight plan. In Step S706, it is determined that KLAS has a CopylD, indicating that it originated from the original flight plan (i.e., KLAS has a matching waypoint in the original flight plan). The process proceeds to Step S710 to obtain the Matchlndex, which corresponds to the position of the matching waypoint in the original flight plan. The Matchlndex for KLAS in the original flight plan is 5, because KLAS is located at index position 5. However, the Originallndex is set to 2. In Step S712, it is determined that the Matchlndex and the Originallndex are not equal, and the process proceeds to Step S714. In Step S714, waypoints from the Originallndex to the MatchIndex-1 (i.e., GCN, PGS, and BLD) are added to the textlist and marked as "removed." KLAS is also added to the textlist, and the Originallndex is set to the Matchlndex+l (i.e., 6). In Step S718, the Modifiedlndex is incremented to position 3. In Step S720, it is determined that all waypoints in the modified flight plan have not been processed, and the process returns to Step S704. In Step S704, ABC is obtained from position 3 of the modified flight plan. In Step S706, it is determined that ABC does not have a Copyld, i.e., it did not originate from the original flight plan. The process proceeds to Step S708 where ABC is added to the textlist. The Modifiedlndex is incremented to 4, Step S718, and the process returns to Step S704 after it is determined in Step S720 that all modified waypoints have not been processed. At this point, the Originallndex is 6 and the Modifiedlndex is 4. Waypoints BTY, BIH, FRA, and HYP are processed and added to the textlist in a similar manner as waypoints LL07 and INW, and a description of their processing is omitted. After HYP is processed, it is determined in Step S720 that all waypoints in the modified flight plan have been processed. The process then proceeds to Step S722 where the waypoints remaining in the original flight plan (i.e., MOD and KSFO) are added to the textlist and marked as "removed." In Step S724, the process returns to Step S702 for the next editing procedure. It is preferable to use the present invention with computer hardware and software that performs the processing and implementing functions. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the systems, methods, and procedures described herein can be embodied in a programmable computer, computer executable software, or digital circuitry. The software can be stored on computer readable media, for example, on a floppy disk, RAM, ROM, a hard disk, removable media, flash memory, memory sticks, optical media, magneto-optical media, CD-ROMs, etc. The digital circuitry can include integrated circuits, gate arrays, building block logic, field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), etc. Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been described above in detail, it will be understood that this description is merely for purposes of illustration. Various modifications of, and equivalent steps corresponding to, the disclosed aspects of the preferred embodiments, in addition to those described above, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention defined in the following claims, the scope of which is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass such modifications and equivalent structures.

Claims: I CLAIM: 1. A method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, comprising: displaying a textlist of waypoints on the modified flight plan and on the original flight plan; modifying the textlist by indicating an insertion point in the textlist to insert a proposed waypoint; determining whether the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist; and when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is not a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a first adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point. 2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein, in said determining step, the textlist is searched forward from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. 3. A method according to Claim 2, further comprising: when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist after the proposed waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint. 4. A method according to Claim 2, further comprising: when it is determined in said determimng step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist from the insertion point to the waypoint prior to the duplicate waypoint. 5. A method according to Claim 3 or 4, further comprising: removing waypoints from the textlist that were both added in said first adding step and designated to be removed in said designating step. 6. A method according to Claim 3 or 4, wherein said displaying step comprises displaying comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 7. A method according to Claim 6, wherein said displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 8. A method according to Claim 1, wherein, in said determining step, the original flight plan is searched backwards from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. 9. A method according to Claim 8, further comprising: when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist before the proposed waypoint back to and including the duplicate waypoint. 10. A method according to Claim 9, further comprising: removing waypoints from the textlist that were both added in said first adding step and designated to be removed in said designating step. 11. A method according to Claim 9, wherein said displaying step comprises displaying comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 12. A method according to Claim 11, wherein said displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 13. A method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, comprising: displaying a textlist of waypoints; copying waypoints from the original flight plan into the modified flight plan; comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan; determining, in a first determining step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in said determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan. 14. A method according to Claim 13, further comprising: determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan, when it is determined in said first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in said second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. 15. A method according to Claim 14, further comprising: designating on the textlist, in a first designating step, waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints from a conresponding position of the waypoint in the original flight plan to an actual position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan, when it is determined in said second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan does not correspond to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. 16. A method according to Claim 15, wherein, in said second determining step, the original flight plan is searched forward from the corresponding position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the original flight plan to determine if the proposed waypoint originated from a waypoint on the original flight plan. 17. A method according to Claim 15, wherein said displaying step comprises displaying comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 18. A method according to Claim 17, wherein said displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 19. A method according to Claim 15, further comprising: designating, in a second designating step, waypoints on the original flight plan to be removed, corresponding to waypoints remaining in the original flight plan when all waypoints in the modified flight plan have been processed. 20. Computer executable code for implementing a method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, said code for executing the steps comprising: displaying a textlist of waypoints on the modified flight plan and on the original flight plan; modifying the textlist by indicating an insertion point in the textlist to insert a proposed waypoint; determining whether the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist; and when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is not a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a first adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point. 21. Computer executable code according to Claim 20, wherein, in said determining step, the textlist is searched forward from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. 22. Computer executable code according to Claim 21, said code for further executing the steps comprising: when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist after the proposed waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint. 23. Computer executable code according to Claim 21, said code for further executing the step comprising: when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints inthe textlist from the insertion point to the waypoint prior to the duplicate waypoint. 24. Computer executable code according to Claim 22 or 23, said code for further executing the step comprising: removing waypoints from the textlist that were both added in said first adding step and designated to be removed in said designating step. 25. Computer executable code according to Claim 22 or 23, wherein said displaying step comprises displaying comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 26. Computer executable code according to Claim 25, wherein said displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 27. Computer executable code according to Claim 20, wherein, in said determining step, the original flight plan is searched backwards from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. 28. Computer executable code according to Claim 27, said code for further executing the step comprising: when it is determined in said determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist before the proposed waypoint back to and including the duplicate waypoint. 29. Computer executable code according to Claim 28, said code for further executing the step comprising: removing waypoints from the textlist that were both added in said first adding step and designated to be removed in said designating step. 30. Computer executable code according to Claim 28, wherein said displaying step comprises displaying comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 31. Computer executable code according to Claim 30, wherein said displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 32. Computer executable code for implementing a method of simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, said code for executing the steps comprising: displaying a textlist of waypoints; copying waypoints from the original flight plan into the modified flight plan; comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan; determining, in a first determimng step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in said determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan. 33. Computer executable code according to Claim 32, said code for further executing the steps comprising: determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan, when it is determined in said first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in said second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. 34. Computer executable code according to Claim 33, said code for further executing the step comprising: designating on the textlist, in a first designating step, waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints from a corresponding position of the waypoint in the original flight plan to an actual position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan, when it is determined in said second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan does not correspond to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. 35. Computer executable code according to Claim 34, wherein, in said second determining step, the original flight plan is searched forward from the corresponding position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the original flight plan to determine if the proposed waypoint originated from a waypoint on the original flight plan. 36. Computer executable code according to Claim 34, wherein said displaying step comprises displaying comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 37. Computer executable code according to Claim 36, wherein said displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 38. Computer executable code according to Claim 34, said code for further executing the step comprising: designating, in a second designating step, waypoints on the original flight plan to be removed, corresponding to waypoints remaining in the original flight plan when all waypoints in the modified flight plan have been processed. 39. An apparatus for simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, comprising: a display device; and a processor, said processor performing the steps comprising: displaying on said display device a textlist of waypoints on the modified flight plan and on the original flight plan; modifying the textlist by indicating an insertion point in the textlist to insert a proposed waypoint; determining whether the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist; and when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is not a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a first adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point. 40. An apparatus according to Claim 39, wherein, in the determimng step, the textlist is searched forward from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. 41. An apparatus according to Claim 40, said processor further performing the steps comprising: when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist after the proposed waypoint up to and including the duplicate waypoint. 42. An apparatus according to Claim 40, said processor further performing the step comprising: when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist from the insertion point to the waypoint prior to the duplicate waypoint. 43. An apparatus according to Claim 41 or 42, said processor further performing the step comprising: removing waypoints from the textlist that were both added in the first adding step and designated to be removed in the designating step. 44. An apparatus according to Claim 41 or 42, wherein the displaying step comprises displaying on said display device comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 45. An apparatus according to Claim 44, wherein the displaying step further comprises displaying on said display device performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 46. An apparatus according to Claim 39, wherein, in the determining step, the original flight plan is searched backwards from the insertion point of the proposed waypoint to determine if the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist. 47. An apparatus according to Claim 46, said processor further performing the steps comprising: when it is determined in the determining step that the proposed waypoint is a duplicate of a waypoint in the textlist, adding, in a second adding step, the proposed waypoint to the textlist at the insertion point, and designating on the textlist waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints in the textlist before the proposed waypoint back to and including the duplicate waypoint. 48. An apparatus according to Claim 47, said processor further performing the step comprising: removing waypoints from the textlist that were both added in the first adding step and designated to be removed in the designating step. 49. An apparatus according to Claim 47, wherein the displaying step comprises displaying on said display device comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 50. An apparatus according to Claim 49, wherein the displaying step further comprises displaying on said display device performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 51. -An apparatus for simultaneously presenting a textual display of an original flight plan and a modified flight plan, comprising: a display device; and a processor, said processor performing the steps comprising: displaying on said display device a textlist of waypoints; copying waypoints from the origmal flight plan into the modified flight plan; comparing each waypoint on the modified flight plan with waypoints on the original flight plan; determining, in a first determining step, for each modified flight plan waypoint, whether the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a first adding step, the modified flight plan waypoint to the textlist, when it is determined in the determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint did not originate from a waypoint in the original flight plan. 52. An apparatus according to Claim 51 , said processor further performing the steps comprising: determining, in a second determining step, a position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan relative to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan, when it is determined in the first determining step that the modified flight plan waypoint originated from a waypoint in the original flight plan; and adding, in a second adding step, the modified flight plan waypomt to the textlist, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan corresponds to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. 53. An apparatus according to Claim 52, said processor further performing the step comprising: designating on the textlist, in a first designating step, waypoints to be removed from the original flight plan, corresponding to waypoints from a corresponding position of the waypoint in the original flight plan to an actual position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan, when it is determined in the second determining step that the position of the originating waypoint in the original flight plan does not correspond to the position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the modified flight plan. 54. An apparatus according to Claim 53, wherein, in the second determining step, the original flight plan is searched forward from the corresponding position of the modified flight plan waypoint in the original flight plan to determine if the proposed waypoint originated from a waypoint on the original flight plan. 55. An apparatus according to Claim 53, wherein the displaying step comprises displaying on said display device comparative performance data for each common waypoint that is on both the original flight plan and the modified flight plan. 56. An apparatus according to Claim 55, wherein the displaying step further comprises displaying performance data for all waypoints that are on the modified flight plan. 57. An apparatus according to Claim 53, said processor further performing the step comprising: designating, in a second designating step, waypoints on the original flight plan to be removed, corresponding to waypoints remaining in the original flight plan when all waypoints in the modified flight plan have been processed.

Inventors: DWYER DAVID B, HART JAN G, DWYER, DAVID, B., HART, JAN, G.
Applicants: HONEYWELL INT INC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Application year: 2001
Main classification: G08G5
IPC codes: G01C23, G08G5