SINGLE COPY GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION PROBES AND METHOD OF GENERATING SAME

Abstract: Nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) hybridization probes are described which comprise a labeled, single copy nucleic acid which hybridizes to a deduced single copy sequence interval in target nucleic acid of known sequence. The probes, which are essentially free of repetitive sequences, can be used in hybridization analyses without adding repetitive sequence-blocking nucleic acids. This allows rapid and accurate detection of chromosomal abnormalities. The probes are preferably designed by first determining the sequence of at least one single copy interval in a target nucleic acid sequence, and developing corresponding hybridization probes which hybridize to at least a part of the deduced single copy sequence. In practice, the sequences of the target and of known genomic repetitive sequence representatives are compared in order to deduce locations of the single copy sequence intervals. The single copy probes can be developed by any variety of methods, such as PCR amplification, restriction or exonuclease digestion of purified genomic fragments, or direct synthesis of DNA sequences. This is followed by labeling of the probes and hybridization to a target sequence.

Description: SINGLE COPY GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION PROBES AND METHOD OF GENERATING SAME RELATED APPLICATION This is a continuation-in-part of Serial No. 09/573,080 filed May 16, 2000. SEQUENCE LISTING A Sequence Listing containing 613 sequences in the form of a computer readable ASCII file in connection with the present invention is incorporated herein by reference and appended hereto as one (1) original compact disk in accordance with 37 CFR 1.821(c), an identical copy thereof in accordance with 37 CFR 1.821(e), and one (1) identical copy thereof in accordance with 37 CFR 1.52(e). COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING APPENDIX A computer program listing appendix containing the source code of a computer program that may be used with the present invention is incorporated herein by reference and appended hereto as one (1) original compact disk, and an identical copy thereof, containing a total of 3 files as follows: Date of Creation Size (Bytes) File Name 04/18/01 26 KB FLNDI.PL 04/18/01 19 KB PRIM.IN 04/18/01 20 KB PRIM.WKG BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention The present invention is broadly concerned with a method for designing single copy hybridization probes useful in the fields of cytogenetics and molecular genetics for determining the presence of specific nucleic acid sequences in a sample of eukaryotic origin, e.g., the probes may be used to analyze specific chromosomal locations by in situ hybridization as a detection of acquired or inherited genetic diseases. More particularly, the invention pertains to such probes, hybridization methods of use thereof and techniques for developing the probes, where the probes are essentially free of genomic repeat sequences, thereby eliminating the need for disabling of repetitive sequences which is required with conventional probes. Description of the Prior Art Chromosome abnormalities are associated with various genetic disorders, which may be inherited or acquired. These abnormalities are of three general types, extra or missing individual chromosomes (aneuploidy), extra or missing portions of chromosomes (including deletions, duplications, supernumerary and marker chromosomes), or chromosomal rearrangements. The latter category includes translocations (transfer of a piece from one chromosome onto another chromosome), inversions (reversal in polarity of a chromosomal segment), insertions (transfer of apiece from one chromosome into another chromosome) and isochromosomes (chromosome arms derived from identical chromosomal segments). The abnormalities may be present only in a subset of cells (mosaicism), or in all cells. Inherited or constitutional abnormalities of various types occur with a frequency of about one in every 250 human births, with results which may be essentially benign, serious or even lethal. Chromosomal abnormalities are common and often diagnostic in acquired disorders such as leukemia and other cancers. Hybridization probes have been developed in the past for chromosome analysis and diagnosis of abnormalities. The probes comprise cloned or amplified genomic sequences or cDNA. For example, U.S. Patents Nos. 5,447,841, 5,663,319 and 5,756,696 describe hybridization probes in the form of labeled nucleic acids which are complementary to nucleic acid segments within target chromosomal DNA. However, these probes contain repetitive sequences and therefore must be used in conjunction with blocking nucleic acids which are substantially complementary to repetitive sequences in the labeled probes. That is, these prior art probes are either pre-reacted with the blocking nucleic acids so as to bind and block the repetitive sequences therein, or such blocking nucleic acids are present in the hybridization reaction mixture. If the repetitive sequences in the probes are not disabled in some manner, the probes will react with the multiple locations in the target chromosomal DNA where the repetitive sequences reside and will not specifically react with the single copy target sequences . This problem is particularly acute with interspersed repeat sequences which are widely scattered throughout the genome, but also is present with tandem repeats clustered or contiguous on the DNA molecule. The requirement for repeat sequence disabilization by using complementary blocking nucleic acids reduces the sensitivity of the existing probes. Reliable, easily detectable signals require DNA probes of from about 40- 100 kb. The prior art also teaches that cloned probes presumed to contain single copy sequences can be identified based on their lack of hybridization to radiolabeled total genomic DNA. In these other studies, hybridization is first performed with probes that contain pools of clones in which each recombinant DNA clone has been individually selected so that it hybridizes to single-copy sequences or very low copy repetitive sequences . A prerequisite step in this prior art is to identify single copy sequences by experimental hybridization of labeled genomic DNA to a candidate DNA probe by Southern or dot-blot hybridization. Positive hybridization with labeled total genomic DNA usually indicates that the candidate DNA probe contains a repetitive sequence and eliminates it from consideration as a single copy probe. Furthermore, an experimental hybridization of a DNA probe with total genomic DNA may fail to reveal the presence of multicopy repetitive sequences that are not abundant (<100 copies) or are infrequent in the genome. Such sequences represent a small fraction of the labeled genomic DNA and the signal they contribute will be below the limits of detection. It has also been suggested to physically remove repeat sequences from probes by experimental procedures (Craig et al., Hum. Genet., 100:472-476 (1997); Durm et al., Biotech. , 24: 820-825 (1998)). This procedure involves prehybridizhig a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified genomic probe with an excess of purified repetitive sequence DNA prior to applying the probe to the DNA target. The resulting purified probe is depleted of repetitive sequences. This procedure is in principle very similar to other procedures that disable the hybridization of repetitive sequences in probes, but the technique is time- consuming and does not provide any advantages over the probes described in Patents Nos. 5,447,841 and 5,756,696. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention overcomes the problem outlined above and provides nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) hybridization probes comprising a labeled, single copy nucleic acid which hybridizes with a deduced single copy sequence interval in target nucleic acid of known sequence. Generally speaking, the probes of the invention are designed by comparing the sequence of a target nucleic acid with known repeat sequences in the genome of which the target is a part; with this information it is possible to deduce the single copy sequences within the target (i.e., those sequences which are essentially free of repeat sequences which, due to the lack of specificity, can mask the hybridization signal of the single copy sequences). As can be appreciated, these initial steps require knowledge of the sequences both of the target and genomic repeats, information which is increasingly available owing to the Human Genome Project and related bioinformatic studies. Furthermore, readily available computer software is used to derive the necessary single copy sequences. The probes hereof are most preferably complementary to the target sequence, i.e., there is a 100% complementary match between the probe nucleotides and the target sequence. More broadly, less than 100% correspondence probes can be used, so long as the probes adequately hybridize to the target sequence, i.e., there should be at least about 80% sequence identity between the probe and a sequence which is a complement to target sequences, more preferably at least about 90% sequence identity. Nucleic acid fragments corresponding to the deduced single copy sequences can be generated by a variety of methods, such as PCR amplification, restriction or exonuclease digestion of purified genomic fragments, or direct nucleic acid synthesis. The single copy fragments are then purified to remove any potentially contaminating repeat sequences, such as, for example, by electrophoresis or denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography; this is highly desirable because it eliminates spurious hybridization and detection of unrelated genomic sequences. The probe fragments may then be cloned into a recombinant DNA vector or directly labeled. The probe is preferably labeled by nick translation using a modified or directly labeled nucleotide. The labeled probe is then denatured and hybridized, preferably to fixed chromosomal preparations on microscope slides or alternately to purified nucleic acid immobilized on a filter, slide, DNA chip, or other substrate. The probes can then be hybridized to chromosomes according to conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods such as those described in U.S. Patents Nos. 5,985,549 or 5,447,841; alternately, they can be hybridized to immobilized nucleic acids according to the techniques described in Patents Nos. 5,110,920 or 5,273,881. Probe signals may be visualized by any of a variety of methods, such as those employing fluorescent, immunological or enzymatic detection reagents. Use of the probes of the invention permits more precise chromosomal breakpoint determinations, to a level of resolution heretofore unobtainable by in situ hybridization. In such analyses, initial probe sets can be prepared from regions believed to be on opposite sides of the breakpoint. After an initial assay to confirm this, successive additional probes closer to the breakpoint can be designed, using the single copy strategy. In this fashion, the precise region of the breakpoint can be determined. It has been found that use of putative single copy probes can determine the existence of heretofore unknown repeat sequences in a genome. The heretofore unknown repeated sequence families can then be included in the repetitive sequence database so that these sequences can be used in the design of subsequent single copy probes. It was also found that probes may contain sequences that are duplicated or triplicated in the genome which can have stronger hybridization due to the increased length of the target sequence. Also, these duplicons or triplicons can be confirmed, as such, using single copy probes which is more difficult with available commercial probes. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figures 1-12 are respective CCD camera images of FISH experiments wherein various gene-specific digoxigenin-dUTP labeled probes were hybridized onmetaphase cells and detected with rhodamine conjugated antibody to digoxigenin and where the chromosomes were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Chromosomes with one or both chromatids hybridized are indicated by arrows whereas a star indicates the absence of normally expected hybridizations. In particular, Fig. 1 illustrates hybridization results using the 5170 bp HIRA probe described in Example 1 , and wherein the probe was reacted with purified repetitive DNA sequences; Fig. 2 illustrates a comparative hybridization identical to that depicted in Fig. 1, using the same 5170 bp HIRA probe but without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences; Fig.3 illustrates hybridization results using the 3544 bp 15ql 1 -ql 3 probe pre-reacted with purified repetitive DNA; Fig. 4 illustrates results in a comparative experiment using the 3544 bp 15ql l-ql3 probe without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA; Fig. 5 illustrates hybridization results using the 4166 bp, 3544 bp and 2290 bp 15ql l-ql3 probes described in Example 2, without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences; Fig. 6 illustrates hybridization results using the 5170 bp, 3691 bp, 3344 bp and 2848 bp HIRA probes described in Example 1 without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences; Fig. 7 illustrates hybridization results using the 4823 bp lp36.3 probe described in Example 2 on metaphase cells of a normal individual, with pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences; Fig. 8 illustrates a comparative hybridization result using the 4823 bp lp36.3 probe of Fig. 7 without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences; Fig. 9 illustrates hybridization results using the 4724 bp and 4823 bp lp36.3 probes described in Example 2 with pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences, and wherein single copy hybridizations were observed on homologous pairs of chromosome 1 s; Fig. 10 illustrates a comparative hybridization result using the 4724 bp and 4823 bp lp36.3 probes described in Example 2 without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA sequences, and depicting the same single copy hybridizations shown in Fig. 9; Fig. 11 illustrates hybridization results using the 4166 bp, 3544 bp and 2290 bp 15ql l-ql3 probes described in Example 2 without pre-reaction with purified DNA sequences on metaphase cells of a patient affected with Prader-Willi syndrome and known to harbor a deletion of 15ql l-ql3 sequences for one chromosomal allele, with a star indicating lack of hybridization at the deleted chromosome position and with the arrow indicating hybridization to a single chromosome; Fig. 12 illustrates hybridization results using the 3691 bp, 3344 bp and 2848 bp HIRA probes described in Example 1 without pre-reaction with purified DNA sequences on metaphase cells of a patient affected with DiGeorge/Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome (VCFS) known to harbor a deletion of 22ql l.2 sequences, wherein the star indicating lack of hybridization at the deleted chromosome position and the arrow indicating a normal homolog; Fig. 13 is a scatterplot of base pair coordinates versus single copy probe lengths found in the Breakage Cluster Region gene (BCR) promoter found on chromosome 22, the disruption of which is common in cases of chronic adult myeloid leukemia and in some cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, as described in Example 4; Fig. 14 is a scatterplot of base pair coordinates versus single copy probe lengths found in the ABLl gene on chromosome 9, the disruption of which is common in cases of chronic adult myeloid leukemia and in some cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, as described in Example 4; Fig. 15 is a CCD camera image of a FISH experiment using chromosome 9q34- specific, digoxigenin-dUTP labeled probes from the ABLl oncogene (SEQ ID Nos. 520- 525), and detected with rhodamine (red) conjugated antibody to digoxigenin with DAPI stained metaphase cells from a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), illustrating the use of probes downstream of the site of fusion between ABLl gene and BCR gene used to make a precise chromosomal breakpoint determination as explained in Example 4 wherein the derivative chromosome 22 and normal chromosome 9 are indicated; and Fig. 16 is a CCD camera image of a FISH experiment using chromosome 9q34- specific, digoxigenin-dUTP labeled probes from the ABLl oncogene (SEQ ID Nos. 516- 525) and detected with rhodamine (red) conjugated antibody to digoxigenin, with DAPI stained metaphase cells from a patient with CML, illustrating the use of probes from each side of the site of fusion between BCR and ABLl genes used to make a precise chromosomal 9q34 breakpoint determination as explained in Example 4, wherein the derivative chromosome 22, derivative chromosome 9 and normal chromosome 9 are indicated. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The present invention is concerned with nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) hybridization probes useful for detection of genetic or neoplastic disorders. The probes are in the form of labeled nucleic acid fragments or a collection of labeled nucleic acid fragments whose hybridization to a target sequence can be detected. The invention also pertains to methods of developing, generating and labeling such probes, and to uses thereof. The labeled probes hereof may be used with any nucleic acid target that may potentially contain repetitive sequences. These target sequences may include, but are not limited to chromosomal or purified nuclear DNA, heteronuclear RNA, or mRNA species that contain repetitive sequences as integral components of the transcript. In the ensuing detailed explanation, the usual case of a DNA target sequence and DNA probes is discussed; however, those skilled in the art will understand that the discussion is equally applicable (with art-recognized differences owing to the nature of the target sequences and probes) to other nucleic acid species. An important characteristic of the probes of the invention is that they are composed of "single copy" or "unique" DNA sequences which are both complementary to at least a portion of the target DNA region of interest and are essentially free of sequences complementary to repeat sequences within the genome of which the target region is a part. Accordingly, a probe made up of a single copy or unique sequence is complementary to essentially only one sequence in the corresponding genome. Very recently, it has been discovered that the human genome contains highly similar domains which have been termed duplicons when they are present in two non-allelic copies or triplicons when present in three copies in the genome (Ji et al., Genome Res. , 10:597-610 (2000)). Duplication or triplication of chromosomal domains containing such sequences were recent evolutionary events, based on the fact that non-human primates, in some instances, do not contain multiple copies of these sequences, and on the high degree of sequence similarity between different copies of paralogous sequences. These low copy duplicons (or triplicons) are to be distinguished from classic repetitive sequence families, which tend to either be interspersed throughout the genome or to be tandemly reiterated hundreds to thousands of times in the same chromosomal interval; therefore, probes from duplicons or triplicons are for purposes of the present invention deemed to be within the ambit of "single copy" probes. These duplicons or triplicons have evolved so recently that the sequence and organization of an entire genomic domain - which comprises complex, near-single copy segments and adjacent members of known repetitive sequence families - is completely conserved in each duplicon or triplicon segment. Duplicon and triplicon lengths of several kilobases to megabase sizes have been reported (International Genome Sequencing Consortium, Nature, 409:860-922 (2001)). The duplicons/triplicons are often tandemly arranged, and are almost always present on the same chromosome, and are therefore clustered in the genome. The length of the interval separating paralogous probe sequences is dictated by the size of the duplicated/triplicated domain, the orientation of the duplicons (or triplicons) relative to each other (ie. direct or inverted), and the length of unrelated sequence intervals, if any, which separate the duplicons/triplicons. In the context of the present invention, the term "single copy" with reference to a nucleic acid sequence refers to a sequence wliich is strictly unique (i.e., wliich is complementary to one and one only sequence in the corresponding genome) but also covers duplicons and triplicons. Stated otherwise, a "single copy" probe in preferred forms will hybridize to three or less locations in the genome. As used herein, a "repeat sequence" is a sequence which repeatedly appears in the genome of which the target DNA is a part, with a sequence identity between repeats of at least about 60%, more preferably at least about 80%, and which is of sufficient length or has other qualities which would cause it to interfere with the desired specific hybridization of the probe to the target DNA (i.e., the probe would hybridize with multiple copies of the repeat sequence). Generally speaking, a repeat sequence appears at least about 10 times in the genome (more preferably at least about 50 times, and most preferably at least about 200 times) and has a length of at least about 50 nucleotides, and more preferably at least about 100 nucleotides. Repeat sequences can be of any variety (e.g., tandem, interspersed, palindromic or shared repetitive sequences with some copies in the target region and some elsewhere in the genome), and can appear near the centromeres of chromosomes, distributed over a single chromosome, or throughout some or all chromosomes. Normally, with but few exceptions, repeat sequences do not express physiologically useful proteins. Repetitive sequences occur in multiple copies in the haploid genome. The number of copies can range from at least about 10 to hundreds of thousands, wherein the Alu family of repetitive DNA are exemplary of the latter numerous variety. The copies of a repeat may be clustered or interspersed throughout the genome. Repeats may be clustered in one or more locations in the genome, for example, repetitive sequences occurring near the centromeres of each chromosome, and variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) (Nakamura et al., Science, 235 : 1616 (1987)); or the repeats may be distributed over a single chromosome for example, repeats found only on the X chromosome as described by Bardoni et al. (Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 46:575 (1987)); or the repeats may be distributed over all the chromosomes, for example, the Alu family of repetitive sequences. Simple repeats of low complexity can be found within genes but are more commonly found in non-coding genomic sequences. Such repeated elements consist of mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, or penta-nucleotide core sequence elements arrayed in tandem units. Often the number of tandem units comprising these repeated sequences varies at the identical locations among genomes from different individuals. These repetitive elements can be found by searching for consecutive runs of the core sequence elements in genomic sequences. As used herein, "sequence identity" refers to a relationship between two or more polynucleotide sequences, namely a reference sequence and a given sequence to be compared with the reference sequence. Sequence identity is determined by comparing the given sequence to the reference sequence after the sequences have been optimally aligned to produce the highest degree of sequence similarity, as determined by the match between strings of such sequences. Upon such alignment, sequence identity is ascertained on a position-by-positionbasis, e.g., the sequences are "identical" at a particular position if at that position, the nucleotides are identical. The total number of such position identities is then divided by the total number of nucleotides or residues in the reference sequence to give % sequence identity. Sequence identity can be readily calculated by known methods, including but not limited to, those described in Computational Molecular Biology, Lesk A. N., ed., Oxford University Press, New York (1988); Biocomputing: Informatics and Genome Projects, Smith D.W., ed., Academic Press, New York (1993); Computer Analysis of Sequence Data, Part I, Griffin A.M., and Griffin H. G., eds., Humana Press, New Jersey (1994); Sequence Analysis in Molecular Biology, von Heinge G., Academic Press (1987); Sequence Analysis Primer, Gribskov M. and Devereux J., eds., M. Stockton Press, New York (1991); and Carillo H., and Lipman D., SIAM J. Applied Math., 48:1073 (1988). Preferred methods to determine the sequence identity are designed to give the largest match between the sequences tested. Methods to determine sequence identity are codified in publicly available computer programs which determine sequence identity between given sequences. Examples of such programs include, but are not limited to, the GCG program package (Devereux etal.,Nwc. ^c. Re5., 12(l):387 (1984)),BLASTP,BLASTNandFASTA (Altschul et al., J. Molec. Biol, 215:403-410 (1990)). The BLASTX program is publicly available fromNCBI and other sources (BLAST Manual, Altschul et al, NCBI, NLM, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894; Altschul etal., J. Molec. Biol, 215:403-410 (1990)). Theseprograms optimally align sequences using default gap weights in order to produce the highest level of sequence identity between the given and reference sequences. As an illustration, by a polynucleotide having a nucleotide sequence having at least, for example, 95% "sequence identity" to a reference nucleotide sequence, it is intended that the nucleotide sequence of the given polynucleotide is identical to the reference sequence except that the given polynucleotide sequence may include up to 5 differences per each 100 nucleotides of the reference nucleotide sequence. In other words, in a polynucleotide having a nucleotide sequence having at least 95% identity relative to the reference nucleotide sequence, up to 5% of the nucleotides in the reference sequence may be deleted or substituted with another nucleotide, or a number of nucleotides up to 5% of the total nucleotides in the reference sequence may be inserted into the reference sequence. Inversions in either sequence are detected by these computer programs based on the similarity of the reference sequence to the antisense strand of the homologous test sequence. These variants of the reference sequence may occur at the 5' or 3' terminal positions of the reference nucleotide sequence or anywhere between those terminal positions, interspersed either individually among nucleotides in the reference sequence or in one or more contiguous groups within the reference sequence. The single copy probes of the invention preferably should have a length of at least about 50 nucleotides, and more preferably at least about 100 nucleotides. Probes of this length are sufficient for Southern blot analyses. However, if other analyses such as FISH are employed, the probes should be somewhat longer, i.e., at least about 500 nucleotides, and more preferably at least about 2000 nucleotides in length. The probes can be used to detect virtually any type of chromosomal rearrangement, such as deletions, duplications, insertions, additions, inversions or translocations. In order to develop probes in accordance with the invention, the sequence of the target DNA region must be known. The target region may be an entire chromosome or only portions thereof where rearrangements have been identified. With this sequence knowledge, the objective is to determine the boundaries of single copy or unique sequences within the target region. This is preferably accomplished by inference from the locations of repetitive sequences within the target region. Normally, the sequence of the target region is compared with known repeat sequences from the corresponding genome, using available computer software. Once the repeat sequences within the target region are identified, the intervening sequences are deduced to be single copy (i.e., the sequences between adjacent repeat sequences). Optimal alignment of the target and repetitive sequences for comparison may be conducted by the local homology algorithm of Smith etal., Adv. Appl. Math, 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needlemanetal.,J Mol. Biol, 48:443 (1970). The results obtained from the heuristic methods (Pearson et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 85:244 (1988); Altschul et al., J Molec. Biol. , 215:403-410 (1990)) are generally not as comprehensive as the methods of Smith et al. (1981) and Needleman et al., (1970). However, they are faster than these methods. Once the single copy sequence information is obtained, certain of the single copy sequences (normally the longest) are used to design hybridization probes. In this regard, probes may be of varying "complexity" as defined by Britten et al., Methods ofEnzymol, 29:363 (1974) and as further explained by Cantor et al., Biophysical Chemistry: Part III: The Behavior of Biological Macromolecules, pp. 1228-1230. The complexity of selected probes is dependent upon the application for which it is designed. In general, the larger the target area, the more complex the probe. The complexity of a probe needed to detect a set of sequences will decrease as hybridization sensitivity increases. At high sensitivity and low background, smaller and less complex probes can be used. With current hybridization techniques, it is possible to obtain reliable, easily detectable signals with relatively small probes in accordance with the invention. A readily detectable signal was obtained with a probe on the order of 2 kb in length, using FISH technology. This sensitivity of the present method is improved compared to the prior art (U.S. Patent No. 5,756,696) because the probes of the present invention are homogeneous single copy sequences. However, smaller amplified segments, each comprising non- repetitive sequences, may also be used in combination as probes to achieve adequate signals for in situ hybridization. Complex single copy probes that hybridize to duplicated or triplicated targets can also increase hybridization signals. One application of the use of multiple fragment probes is in the detection of translocations between different chromosomes. Proportionately increasing the complexity of the probe also permits analysis of multiple compact regions of the genome simultaneously. For a single chromosome, the portion of the probe targeted to one side of the breakpoint can be labeled and detected differently from that targeted to the other side of the breakpoint so that the derivative or translocated chromosome is detected by one label and is distinguishable from the intact normal chromosome which has both labels. The invention makes it possible to produce single copy probes at a higher genomic density than possible using conventional probes. Chromosomes 21 and 22 have been comprehensively sequenced, and it has been determined that adjacent single copy intervals tend to be clustered on these chromosomes. For example, on chromosome 22, 39% of single copy intervals are separated by only 500-1000 bp. Single copy intervals >2.3 kb are separated, on average, by 29.2 kb on chromosome 21 and by 22.3 kb on chromosome 22. In order to estimate the size of genomic intervals required to develop single copy probes, the probability of detecting at least one single copy sequence in overlapping, uniform-length genomic intervals on chromosomes 21 q and 22q was determined. Single copy segments >2.0 kb in length are found in the majority of 100 kb genomic intervals of these chromosomes (96% of chromosome 22q and 88% of chromosome 21q). Increasingthe size of the genomic sequence to 150 kb results in 99% coverage of chromosome 22q and 96% of chromosome 21 q. Therefore, single copy probes should be more or less 2 kb to ensure comprehensive coverage (at least once per 100-150 kb) of chromosomes 21 and 22. Assuming that single copy sequences are similarly distributed on other chromosomes, it should be feasible to develop probes for in situ hybridization analysis of most clinically relevant chromosomal rearrangements. Once appropriate single copy sequences in the chromosomal region of interest have been identified, PCR is preferably used for amplifying the appropriate DNA to obtain probes. PCR is a well known technique for amplifying specific DNA segments in geometric progression and relies upon repeated cycles of DNA polymerase-catalyzed extension from a pair of oligonucleotide primers with homology to the 5' end and to the complement of the 3' end of the DNA segment to be amplified. The nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) that serves as the PCR template maybe single stranded or double stranded, but when the DNA is single stranded, it will typically be converted to double stranded. The length of the template DNA may be as short as 50 bp, but usually will be at least about 100 bp long, and more usually at least about 150 bp long, and may be as long as 10,000 bp or longer, but will usually not exceed 50,000 bp in length, and more usually will not exceed 20,000 bp in length. The DNA may be free in solution, flanked at one or both ends with non-template DNA, present in a cloning vector such as a plasmid and the like, with the only criteria being that the DNA be available for participation in the primer extension reaction. The template DNA may be derived from a variety of different sources, so long as it is complementary to the target chromosomal or immobilized DNA sequence. The amount of template DNA that is combined with the other reagents will range from about 1 molecule to 1 pmol, usually from about 50 molecules to 0.1 pmol, and more usually from about 0.01 pmol to 100 frnol. The oligonucleotide primers with which the template nucleic acid is contacted will be of sufficient length to provide for hybridization to complementary template DNA under annealing conditions but will be of insufficient length to form stable hybrids with template DNA under polymerization conditions. The primers will generally be at least about 10 nucleotides (nt) in length, usually at least 15 nt in length and more usually at least 16 nt in length and may be as long as 30 nt in length or longer, where the length of the primers will generally range from 18 to 50 nt in length, usually from about 20 to 35 nt in length. The yield of longer amplification products can be enhanced using primers of 30 to 35 nt and high fidelity polymerases (described in U.S. Patent No. 5,436,149). To maximize the signal intensity obtained during in situ hybridization, primer sequence pairs are preferred which, upon amplification, produce a DNA fragment that spans nearly the entire length of each single-copy genomic sequence interval. Hence, contiguous or closely spaced (software excludes pairs that are separated by ≤70% of the length of the single copy interval) primer pairs are generally excluded from consideration for producing probes for in situ hybridization. With the exception of cytogenetic preparations, this criterion is generally not applicable for probes that are hybridized to immobilized cloned or synthetic nucleic acid targets, since signal intensities of shorter probes are usually adequate due to the increased number of target molecules. However, in order to optimize the yield and kinetics of the PCR reaction, the desired primer sequences are also subject to other criteria. First, a primer sequence should not be substantially self-complementary or complementary to the second primer. In particular, potential primer sequences are excluded which could result in the formation of stable hybrids involving the 3' terminus of the primer and either another sequence in the same or the second primer (defined as 6 base pairs). Additionally, the T m of one member of the primer pair should occur within 2 ° C of its counterpart, which enables them to denature and anneal to the template nearly simultaneously. Software is well known in the art to identify primer sequences that satisfy all of the preferred criteria (see for example: http://www- genome. wi. mit.edu/ftp/pub/software/primer.0.5/ or http://www.oligo.net/ Oligo_6_tour.htm) . The PCR reaction mixture will normally further comprise an aqueous buffer medium which includes a source of monovalent ions, a source of divalent cations and a buffering agent. Any convenient source of monovalent ions, such as KC1, K-acetate, NH 4 -acetate, K- glutamate, NH 4 Cl, ammonium sulfate, and the like may be employed, where the amount of monovalent ion source present in the buffer will typically be present in an amount sufficient to provide for a conductivity in a range from about 500 to 20,000, usually from about 1000 to 10,000, and more usually from about 3 ,000 to 6,000 microohms. The divalent cation may be magnesium, manganese, zinc and the like, where the cation will typically be magnesium. Any convenient source of magnesium cation may be employed, including MgCl 2 , Mg- acetate, and the like. The amount of Mg +2 - present in the buffer may range from 0.5 to 10 mM, but will preferably range from about 2 to 4 mM, more preferably from about 2.25 to 2.75 mM and will ideally be at about 2.45 mM. Representative buffering agents or salts that may be present in the buffer include Tris, Tricine, HEPES, MOPS and the like, where the amount of buffering agent will typically range from about 5 to 150 mM, usually from about 10 to 100 M, and more usually from about 20 to 50 mM, where in certain preferred embodiments the buffering agent will be present in an amount sufficient to provide a pH ranging from about 6.0 to 9.5, where most preferred is pH 7.3 at 72 °C. Other agents which may be present in the buffer medium include chelating agents, such as EDTA, EGTA and the like. Also present in the PCR reaction mixtures is a melting point reducing agent, i.e., a reagent that lowers the melting point of DNA. Suitable melting point reducing agents are those agents that interfere with the hydrogen bonding interaction of two nucleotides, where representative base pair destabilization agents include: betaine, formamide, urea, thiourea, acetamide, methylurea, glycinamide, and the like, where betaine is a preferred agent. The melting point reducing agent will typically be present in amounts ranging from about 20 to 500 mM, usually from about 50 to 200 mM and more usually from about 80 to 150 mM. In preparing the PCR reaction mixture, the various constituent components may be combined in any convenient order. For example, the buffer may be combined with primer, polymerase and then template DNA, or all of the various constituent components may be combined at the same time to produce the reaction mixture. Following preparation of the PCR reaction mixture, it is subjected to a plurality of reaction cycles, where each reaction cycle comprises: (1) a denaturation step, (2) an annealing step, and (3) a polymerization step. The number of reaction cycles will vary depending on the application being performed, but will usually be at least 15, more usually at least 20 and may be as high as 60 or higher, where the number of different cycles will typically range from about 20 to 40. For methods where more than about 25, usually more than about 30 cycles are performed, it may be convenient or desirable to introduce additional polymerase into the reaction mixture such that conditions suitable for enzymatic primer extension are maintained. The denaturation step comprises heating the reaction mixture to an elevated temperature and maintaining the mixture at the elevated temperature for a period of time sufficient for any double stranded or hybridized nucleic acid present in the reaction mixture to dissociate. For denaturation, the temperature of the reaction mixture will usually be raised to, and maintained at, a temperature ranging from about 85 to 100 °C usually from about 90 to 98°C, and more usually from about 93 to 96°C for a period of time ranging from about 3 to 120 seconds, usually from about 5 to 30 seconds. Following denaturation, the PCR reaction mixture will be subjected to conditions sufficient for primer annealing to template DNA present in the mixture. The temperature to which the reaction mixture is lowered to achieve these conditions will usually be chosen to provide optimal efficiency and specificity, and will generally range from about 50 to 75 °C, usually from about 55 to 70°C and more usually from about 60 to 68 °C. Annealing conditions will be maintained for a period of time ranging from about 15 seconds to 30 minutes, usually from about 30 seconds to 5 minutes. Following annealing of primer to template DNA or during annealing of primer to template DNA, the reaction mixture will be subjected to conditions sufficient to provide for polymerization of nucleotides to the primer ends in manner such that the primer is extended in a 5' to 3' direction using the DNA to which it is hybridized as a template, i.e. conditions sufficient for enzymatic production of primer extension product. To achieve polymerization conditions, the temperature of the reaction mixture will typically be raised to or maintained at a temperature ranging from about 65 to 75 °C, usually from about 67 to 73 °C and maintained for a period of time ranging from about 15 seconds to 20 minutes, usually from about 30 seconds to 5 minutes. The above cycles of denaturation, annealing and polymerization may be performed using an automated device, typically known as a thermal cycler. Thermal cyclers that may be employed are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,612,473; 5,602,756; 5,538,871; and 5,475,610. Based on all the previous criteria, a series of primers were produced and validated by PCR using genomic DNA from normal individuals. Knowledge of suitable primers will necessarily define the corresponding PCR-produced probes in accordance with the invention. Thus, adjacent pairs of sequences identified as SEQ ID Nos. 429-446 and 480-613, beginning with SEQ ID No .429, are respective forward/reverse PCR primers developed for the production of specific useful probes. Hence, a useful probe may be produced using a combination of SEQ ID Nos. 429 and 430, and additional probes are defined by the succeeding pairs of adjacent SEQ IDs. Broadly speaking, certain preferred probes of the invention should have at least about 80% sequence identity, and more preferably about 90% sequence identity, relative to the probes defined by the above-described adjacent pairs of primer sequences. In addition to the PCR, DNA fragments corresponding to unique sequences can also be obtained by a variety of other methods, including but not limited to deletion mutagenesis, restriction digestion, direct synthesis and DNA ligation. If the genomic fragment is obtained by amplification or purification from DNA containing repetitive sequences, the fragment must then be purified prior to labeling and hybridization. Purification of homogeneously-sized DNA fragments can be accomplished by a variety of methods, including but not limited to electrophoresis and high pressure liquid chromatography. In the preferred method, amplified fragments are separated according to size by gel electrophoreses in Seakem LE Agarose using Tris Acetate buffer (Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989]), stained with a dye such as ethidium bromide or Syber-Green, visualized with ultraviolet light (300 nm), excised from the gel using a scalpel. Each DNA fragment is then recovered from the gel fragment using a Micro-con 100 (Millipore, Watertown, MA) column by spin centrifugation. Phenol-chloroform extraction of the amplified DNA is not an adequate method of purification. When this approach was tested, this purification technique resulted in nonspecific hybridization to all cliromosomes along their entire length, which is consistent with the pattern produced by hybridization of repetitive sequences (data not shown). This occurs because, during the PCR process, DNA polymerase extends the replicated strand past the position of the second primer into adjacent repetitive sequences if the initial template contains genomic DNA sequences. These extension products which are longer than the amplification product, are present in all such PCR reactions. Since, in the present method, repetitive sequences are adjacent to the segments being amplified, the extension products are likely to contain such sequences. Phenol-chloroform extraction of PCR reactions does not remove such extension products. PCR reaction mixtures containing these sequences may hybridize to repetitive genomic DNA in addition to the target sequence. Hence, isolation of the purified genomic amplification fragment (whether it is obtained directly from genomic DNA or by PCR), is a preferred embodiment of the subject invention and would not be obvious to one skilled in the art. Insertion of the purified fragments into plasmids, bacteriophages, or artificial chromosome cloning vehicles capable of being propagated in E. coli, yeast, or other species may be desirable to reduce the cost and labor required for repeated preparation of single copy DNA probes. A variety of cloning vectors have been optimized for rapid ligation and selectionfor vectors containing PCR products (for example: U.S. PatentNos.5,487,993 and 5,766,891). If the probe will be used in multiple hybridizations, then the cloned recombmant form will be less expensive to produce in large quantities than by iterative PCR amplification from the same genomic DNA template. In addition, genomic insert in the cloned probe does not have to be isolated during purification, since the fragment recombined with vector is propagated in the absence of any other genomic DNA that could potentially contain repetitive sequences. Finally, the cloned vehicle provides a potentially inexhaustible source of probe, whereas natural genomic DNA templates may have to be reisolated from cell lines or from other sources. Single copy DNA fragments obtained by PCR amplification as described above are isolated according to size by gel electrophoresis and purified by columns as is well known in the art. These fragments are then labeled with nonisotopic identifying label such as a fluorophore, an enzymatic conjugate, or one selected from the group consisting of biotin or other moieties recognized by avidin, streptavidin, or specific antibodies. There are several types of non-isotopic identifying labels. One type is a label which is chemically bound to the probe and serves as the means for identification and localization directly. An example of this type would be a fluorochrome moiety which upon application of radiation of proper wavelengths will become excited into a high energy state and emit fluorescent light. The probes can be synthesized chemically or preferably be prepared using the methods of nick- translation (Rigby et al., J Mol. Biol, 113:237-251, (1977)) or Klenow labeling (Feinberg et al., Anal. Biochem., 12,1:266-261, (1984)) in the conventional manner using a reactant comprising the identifying label of choice (but not limited to) conjugated to a nucleotide such as dATP or dUTP . The fragments are either directly labeled with a fluorophore-tagged nucleotide or indirectly labeled by binding the labeled duplex to a fluorescently-labeled antibody that recognizes the modified nucleotide that is incorporated into the fragment as described below. Nick-translations (100 μl reaction) utilize endonuclease-free DNA polymerase I (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) and DNase I (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ). Each fragment is combined with DNA polymerase (20 units/microgram DNA), DNase I (10 microgram/100 μl reaction), labeled nucleotide (0.05 mm final) and nick translation buffer. The reaction is performed at 15 °C for 45 minutes to 2 hours and yields a variety of labeled probe fragments of different nucleotide sizes in the 100 to 500 bp size range. Other methods for labeling and detecting probes in common use may be applied to the single-copy DNA probes produced by the present method. These include: fluorochrome labels (which resolve labeling on individual chromatids which serves as an affirmation that hybridization occurred unequivocably, and further allows detection precisely at site of hybridization rather than at some distance away), chemical reagents which yields an identifiable change when combined with the proper reactants (for example, alkaline phosphatase, horseradish peroxidase and galactosidase, each of which reacts and provide a detectable color change that identifies the presence and position of the target sequence), and indirect linkage mechanism of specifically binding entities (such as the biotin-avidin system in which the probe is preferably joined to biotin by conventional methods and added to an avidin- or streptavidin-conjugated fluorochrome or enzyme which provides the specificity for attaching the fluorochrome or enzyme to the probe). It will be recognized that other identifying labels may also be used with the described probes. These include fluorescent compositions such as energy transfer groups, conjugated proteins, antibodies and antigens, or radioactive isotopes. Chromosomal hybridization and detection are a preferred use of DNA probes generated by the present invention. DNA probes generated by the present method may be hybridized either directly to complementary nucleic acids in cells (in situ hybridization) or to nucleic acids immobilized on a substrate. A preferred use of the method is in situ hybridization, which is well known in the art, being described in U.S. Patent. Nos. 5,985,549; 5,447,841; 5,756,696; 5,869,237. Based on early work of Gall and Pardue (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 63:378-383, 1969), isotopic in situ hybridization was established in the 1970s (see Gerhard et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 78:3755-3759, 1981 and Harper et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 78:4458-4460, 1981 as examples) and subsequently nonisotopic in situ hybridization was established. The technique of nonisotopic in situ hybridization is reviewed and a protocol is provided for use in chromosomal hybridization by Knoll and Lic ter,in Current Protocol in Human Genetics,Vol. 1, Unit 4.3 (Green-Wiley, New York, 1994) and in U.S. Patent No. 5,985,549. The technique relies on the formation of duplex nucleic acid species, in which one strand is derived from a labeled probe molecule and the second strand comprises the target to be detected. Target molecules may comprise chromosomes or cellular nucleic acids. Numerous methods have been developed to label the probe and visualize the duplex. The method of the present invention is intended to be used with any nucleic acid target containing repetitive sequences. The sample containing the target nucleic acid sequence can be prepared from cellular nuclei, morphologically intact cells (or tissues), chromosomes, other cellular material components, or synthetically produced nucleic acids. The samples may be obtained from the fluids or tissues of a mammal, preferably human, which are suspected of being afflicted with a disease or disorder either from a biopsy or post-mortem, or from plants. As an example, chromosomal preparations can be made in the following manner: phytohemagglutinin-stimulatedperipheral lymphocytes are cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum for 72 hours at 37 ° C. Ethidium bromide ( 1 OOug/l 0ml final) is added 1-1/2 hours prior to harvest. Colcemid (lug/lOml final) is added during the final 20 min of incubation with ethidium bromide. The cells are then pelleted by centrifugation and incubated preferably in 0.075 M KC1 at 37°C for about 20 minutes. Cells are then pelleted again and fixed in 3 changes of Carnoy's fixative (3:1 methanol: acetic acid volumetric ratio) using conventional cytogenetic techniques. [For a review of chromosome preparation from peripheral blood cells, see Bangs and Donlon in Dracopoli et al., eds., Current Protocols in Human Genetics, Vol. 1, Unit 4.1 (Green- Wiley, New York, 1994)]. The nuclei or cells in suspension can then be dropped onto clear glass coverslips or microscope slides in a humid environment to promote chromosome spreading. The coverslips or microscope slides can then be preferentially air dried overnight, aged or stored until required for use in in situ hybridization. Immediately prior to chromosomal denaturation in the in situ hybridization procedure, the dried or stored chromosome preparations can be pretreated in prewarmed 2 x SSC (components are in Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989]) for 30 minutes at 37°C followed by dehydration in an ethanol series (2 minutes each in 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% ethanol). When the target nucleic acid sequence is DNA, DNA in the sample can be denatured by heat or alkali. [See Harper et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 78:4458-60 (1981), for alkali denaturation and Gall et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 63:370-383 (1969)]. Denaturation is carried out so that the DNA strands are separated with minimal shearing, degradation or oxidation. In the preferred current method, the labeled single copy probe is resuspended in deionized formamide and denatured at 70-75 °C. The chromosomal template is denatured in a solution containing 70% formamide/2 x SSC, pH 7.0 followed by dehydration in an ethanol series (2 minutes each in cold 70% ethanol and room temperature 80, 90 and 100% ethanol). Hybridization of the labeled probe to the corresponding template is carried out in a solution containing 50% formamide/2 x SSC/10% dextran sulfate/BSA [bovine serum albumin; 1 mg/ml final] for a few hours to overnight. The length of time depending on the complexity of the probe that is utilized. After hybridization, non-hybridizing excess probe is removed by a washing procedure. The duplexes are treated with a series of 15-30 minute washes: first with a solution of 50% formamide/2xSSC at 39-45°C, then 2 x SSC at 39- 45 °C, followed by a 15-30 minute wash at room temperature in 1 x SSC. The hybridized sequences are detected by relevant means. For example, digoxigenin-dUTP can be but is not limited to detection by an antibody to digoxigenin such as rhodamine or fluorescein conjugated antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Following detection, spurious detection reagents are removed by washing in varying SSC and SSC/triton-X concentrations, the chromosomes are counterstained with a dye such as DAPI and the hybridized preparation is mounted in an antifade solution such as Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, C A) . The cells are examined by fluorescence microscopy with the appropriate filter sets and imaged with a charge coupled device (CCD). An important aspect of the present invention is that the probe or target DNA does not require pre-reaction with a non-specific nucleic acid competitor such as purified repetitive DNA or that the probe does not require experimental verification that the single copy fragments or recombinant cloned probes do not contain repetitive sequences (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,985,549; 5,447,841; 5,663,319; 5,756,696) because the probes are single copies without repetitive elements. This results in a significantly improved signal to noise ratio. A signal to noise ratio is defined as a ratio of the probability of the probe detecting a bona fide signal of hybridization of the target nucleic acid sequence to that of the probability of detecting the background caused by non-specific binding of the labeled probe. The hybridization reactions carried out using the probes of the invention are themselves essentially conventional. As indicated, two exemplary types of hybridizations are the Southern blot and FISH techniques, well known to those skilled in the art. However, the visual patterns resulting from use of the probes, termed indicator patterns, are extremely useful tools for cytogenetic analyses, especially molecular cytogenetic analyses. These indicator patterns facilitate microscopic and/or flow cytometric identification of normal and abnormal chromosomes and characterization of the genetic abnormalities. Since multiple compatible methods of probe visualization are available, the binding patterns of different components of the probes can be distinguished, for example, by color. Thus, the invention is capable of producing virtually any desired indicator pattern on the chromosomes visualized with one or more colors (a multi-color indicator pattern) and/or other indicator methods. Preferred indicator patterns derived from using the probes of the invention comprise one or more "bands," meaning a reference point in a genome comprising a target DNA sequence with a probe bound thereto, and wherein the resulting duplex is detectable by some indicator. Depending on hybridization washes and the detection conditions, a band can extend from the narrow context of a sequence providing a reliable signal to a single chromosome region to multiple regions on single or plural chromosomes. The indicator bands from the probes hereof are to be distinguished from bands produced by pretreatment and chemical staining. The probe-produced bands of the present invention are based upon the complementarity of the DNA sequences, whereas bands produced by chemical staining depend upon natural characteristics of the chromosomes (such as structure or protein composition), but not by hybridization to the DNA sequences thereof. Furthermore, chemical staining techniques are useful only in connection with metaphase chromosomes, whereas the probe-produced bands of the present invention are useful for both metaphase and interphase chromosomes. The following examples set forth the preferred techniques employed for the development, generation, labeling and use of specific D A probes designed to hybridize to a target DNA sequence in a genome. It is to be understood, however, that these examples are provided by way of illustration and nothing therein should be taken as a limitation upon the overall scope of the invention. Example 1 Development of HIRA Gene Probe A known genetic disorder on human chromosome 22 involves a deletion of one HIRA gene in chromosome band 22ql 1.2, i.e., in normal individuals; there are two copies of the HIRA gene, whereas in affected individuals, only one copy is present. This deletion is considered to be a cause of haploinsufficiency syndromes such as DiGeorge and Velo- Cardio-Facial Syndromes (NCFS), because insufficient amounts of gene product(s) may disrupt normal embryonic development (Fibison et al., Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 46:888-95 (1990); Consevage et al, ^mer. J Cardiol, 77:1023-1205 (1996)). Other syndromes including Cat Eye Syndrome and derivative chromosome 22 syndrome result from an excess of genomic sequences from this region (Mears et al., Amer. J Hum. Genet., 55:134-142 (1994); Knoll et al.,^mer. J Med. Genet., 55:221-224 (1995)). Typically individuals with these syndromes have supernumerary derivative chromosome 22s. Initially, a computer-based search using the search term "HIRA" was performed using Entrez Nucleotide software at the National Library of Medicine website. This identified a series of cDNA sequences for the HIRA gene in GenBank. The full length cDNA sequence was selected (GenBank Accession No. X81844), having 3859 bp. This cDNA sequence was then compared with the genome sequence which included draft sequences at the National Library of Medicine (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/se- q/page.cgi?F= HsBlast.html&&ORG=Hs). This was done in order to determine whether genomic sequences of sufficient length were available for probe development. This comparison confirmed that the entire HIRA genomic sequence was known, and that the coding sequence interval spanned a length of 100,836 bp in the chromosome. Since the available contiguous genomic sequence in GenBank exceeded the length of the coding interval, it was possible to select an interval longer than the coding region in order to include sequences from the gene promoter at the 5' end and untranslated sequences and polyadenyla- tion signal at the 3' end. A total genomic interval of approximately 103 kb was thus selected. Position 1 of this -103 kb interval corresponds to position 798,334 in GenBank Accession number NT_001039. In the next step, the selected 103 kb genomic interval was compared with known high-complexity repeat sequence family members or consensus sequences that are aligned with the test genomic sequences (SEQ ID Nos. 1-428) and all combinations of low- complexity tandem repeat sequences of at least 17 nucleotides in length (mono-, di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide units) known to be present in the human genome (SEQ ID Nos. 447-479). This comparison was done using the publicly available CENSOR program which can be found at the Genetic hrformation Research Institute website, www.girinst.org. This program utilizes the Smith- Waterman global alignment comparison algorithm to determine the locations and distribution of repeat sequences within the genomic interval. A Smith- Waterman alignment of repetitive with genomic sequences was performed with the following parameters: Length of margin sequence: 50 nt, minimum length to extract insertion: 12 nt, minimum margin to combine matching fragments: 30, similarity threshold: 22, similarity threshold to always keep match: 35, ratio threshold: 2.8, relative similarity threshold: 2.8, gap constant DI: 2.95, gap constant D2: 1.90, and mismatch penalty: -1.0. This analysis generated the following table, which details the coordinates of repetitive sequence family members found in and adjacent to the human HIRA gene coding sequence. Table 1 Position (bp) in Seq.Listing HIRA position (bp) Corresponding to HIRA Match Begin End Repeat Family SEQ ID NO. Begin End 798411 798434 (AC) 452 1 24 798983 799395 MLT2A1 444 1 434 8012 5 7 801348 CHESHIRE A 420 132 223 801367 801729 LIME ORF2 425 757 1089 801746 802032 Alu-Jb 2 2 289 802033 802308 LIME ORF2 425 1090 1380 80235S 802434 L1MB6 5 77 1629 1710 802448 802798 L1M3D 5 66 996 1348 802811 803100 Alu-Y 2 1 290 803104 803189 L1M3D 5 66 907 995 803199 803454 Alu-Jb 2 5 290 803472 803 5 4 5 Alu-Spqxz 2 2 76 803 5 48 804061 L1MEC .5 345 1860 2392 804079 80436 5 Alu-Sz 2 6 290 804476 804 5 59 LIP MA2 348 6242 6321 80462 5 804885 LIME ORF2 425 2287 2568 804936 804997 MLT1E2 106 198 260 805011 805077 MLT1E1 105 420 484 Begin End Repeat Family SEQ ID NO. Begin End 805110 805211 L1PBA 5 359 103 204 805212 805862 L1PBA 5 359 1089 1738 805933 805989 Alu-J 2 234 290 805991 806489 L1PBA 5 359 1749 2247 806510 806624 LI 59 1659 1773 806628 806917 Alu-Sz 2 1 290 806919 807254 L1M2 5 61 2377 2716 807301 808176 L1P_MA2 348 3516 4425 808179 808469 Aiu-Sz 2 1 290 808476 808734 LI 5 9 3268 3525 808735 809426 LIME ORF2 42 5 1411 2105 809429 809860 LIP MA2 348 5607 6044 809861 809993 Alu-Jb 2 2 134 809996 810282 Alu-Jb 2 2 290 810345 811040 LI 59 4711 5402 811041 811221 L1PB3 358 151 333 811226 811513 Alu-Sx 2 1 287 811515 812032 L1PB1 357 330 863 812096 812394 Alu-Jb 2 1 288 812474 812698 Alu-Jb 2 5 229 812721 812836 Alu-Jo 2 2 117 812862 812901 LIP MA2 348 4315 4354 812903 813078 LI 59 3028 3222 813079 814102 LIME 0RF2 425 1113 2166 814323 814410 MER1B 315 242 337 814411 814557 CHARLIE3 7 1 281 814780 814916 L1MB7 78 9 143 815061 815181 Alu-Y 2 1 134 815420 815452 LTR67 279 99 131 816487 816772 Alu-Sx 2 5 290 817180 817270 L1MCC 5 335 1384 1473 817332 817620 Alu-Sg 2 1 290 817634 817909 Alu-Sq 2 1 288 817943 818227 Alu-Sx 2 2 289 818368 818578 HAL1 18 1346 1547 818631 818791 LINE2 362 2280 2464 818824 818889 Alu-S 2 223 290 818890 819185 LINE2 362 2465 2749 819328 819450 LINE2 362 1925 2049 819565 819757 LINE2 362 2273 2498 823604 823892 Alu-Jo 2 2 290 826836 827042 Alu-Sxzg 2 84 290 827922 827977 MIR 99 105 160 830762 831371 L1MEC_5 345 1498 2123 831396 831685 Alu-Sx 2 2 290 831687 831774 L1MEC_5 34 5 2117 2205 831778 832066 Alu-Sx 2 1 290 832155 832288 Alu-FLA 2 5 134 832317 832431 L1MC2 79 666 786 832442 832735 Alu-Sz 2 1 289 832742 832992 L1MC2 79 787 1077 833004 833170 LIME 0RF2 42 5 172 340 833177 834590 TIGGER1 148 1 1477 834592 834642 Alu-Jb 2 156 207 834799 834877 Alu-Jb 2 208 290 834907 835194 Alu-Y 2 1 289 835198 835590 TIGGER1 148 1468 1900 835597 835888 Alu-Sx 2 1 290 835946 835979 LIP MA2 348 4654 4689 836060 836177 MER2 316 229 345 836203 836486 Alu-Sx 2 7 290 836497 836712 MER2 316 1 228 838478 838760 Alu-Sz 2 1 288 838822 839069 Alu-Sx 2 1 288 839086 839373 Alu-Sz 2 1 289 840297 840926 L1MB7 78 269 915 841062 841306 L1MB7 78 7 249 841323 841382 LIME 0RF2 425 3053 3116 Begin End Repeat Family SEQ ID NO. Begin End 841408 841697 Alu-Sq 2 1 290 841705 841828 Alu-Jo 2 1 136 841829 842012 LIME ORF2 425 2870 3052 842744 842871 MER86 239 51 183 842879 843107 Alu-Spqxz 2 3 230 843109 843271 Alu-Jo 2 9 175 847056 847210 MER104 293 1 179 847256 847351 L1ME4 343 128 224 847413 847551 MIR 99 65 218 847570 847695 L1ME4 343 1 127 847865 848137 Alu-Y 2 1 290 848171 848458 Alu-Sg 2 1 290 848493 848564 L1PA7 355 35 105 848646 848928 Alu-Sc 2 5 290 849186 849435 L1ME_0RF2 425 2527 2796 849450 849745 Alu-Sx 2 5 289 850114 850249 LIP MA2 348 5447 5610 850250 850761 LI 59 3478 4017 850824 850942 LIME ORF2 425 1128 1265 851588 851614 (T) 449 (complement) 1 27 851749 851881 L1ME2 341 357 523 852607 852853 L1MA10 72 664 918 852863 853156 Alu-Sc 2 1 290 853176 853211 L1MA10 72 628 663 853212 853267 L1MA9 75 987 1041 853491 853779 Alu-Sz 2 1 290 859137 859435 Alu-Sx 2 1 290 859436 859456 (A) 449 1 21 859570 859805 L1ME3A 342 215 442 859806 860289 L1ME2 341 375 879 860318 860605 Alu-Y 2 1 290 862194 862481 Alu-Sg 2 1 290 865060 865350 Alu-Sq 2 1 290 867521 867800 Alu-Jb 2 1 288 867836 867876 MIR 99 157 196 869546 869802 LINE2 362 123 413 869923 870118 LINE2 362 1251 1450 870124 870202 Alu-J 2 48 132 870203 870296 LINE2 362 1451 1592 870316 870666 LINE2 362 1708 2097 871000 871075 LINE2 362 2617 2736 871650 871935 Alu-Jo 2 1 290 871936 871960 (GAAAAA) 4 28 872154 872444 Alu-Sc 2 1 289 874867 874990 L1MB7 78 529 676 878120 878408 Alu-Sx 2 1 290 881003 881054 MLT1G 109 217 268 881130 881266 MLT1G 109 269 480 881293 881346 MLT1G 109 415 469 881762 881891 LINE2B 363 85 229 882448 882740 Alu-SbO 2 1 290 883566 883716 Alu-Sz 2 1 288 883782 883977 Alu-Sc 2 2 290 883988 884329 L1P_MA2 348 5600 5935 884333 884623 Alu-Sp 2 1 290 884624 885134 LIME ORF2 425 2431 2975 885160 885456 Alu-Jb 2 9 290 885460 885742 LlME_ORF2 425 2949 3252 885744 886031 Alu-Sx 2 1 288 886032 886082 Alu-Sp 2 291 341 886083 886166 L1MB7 78 137 220 886168 886454 Alu-Sc 2 1 290 886535 887059 L1MB7 78 345 901 887169 887460 Alu-Y 2 1 289 887485 887748 L1MD2 337 794 1072 887752 887779 LORII 366 395 422 888253 888318 LINE2 362 2440 2505 888385 888548 LINE2 362 2579 2739 Begin End Repeat Family SEQ ID NO. Begin End 888865 888893 LOR1I 366 394 422 889006 889296 Alu-Jb 2 5 290 889446 889548 Alu-Jo 2 188 290 889549 889677 L1PB3 358 770 897 889842 890133 Alu-Sq 2 1 290 890515 890797 Alu-Sz 2 1 283 890858 890972 L1ME2 341 769 885 890986 891024 LOR1I 366 396 434 891028 891063 LTR66 266 173 207 891126 891536 LINE2 362 1980 2452 891545 891670 LTR16A1 382 9 128 891688 891963 LTR16A 381 146 429 892907 893013 LINE2 362 2636 2747 893851 893924 MLT1L 119 47 119 894528 894849 Alu-Sx 2 1 290 895825 895903 L1NE2 362 2592 2664 895912 896083 MER20 317 46 216 897067 897299 MER20 317 2 217 897492 897624 Alu-FLA 2 2 136 897977 898261 Alu-Sc 2 1 290 The lengths of the non-repetitive intervals were calculated from these data. For example, anon-repetitive interval of 5358 bp was determined between coordinate positions 853779 and 859137 which delineate the boundaries of adj acent Alu-Sz and Alu-Sx repetitive elements. Next, the non-repetitive intervals were sorted based on their respective lengths. Four of these non-repetitive intervals were selected for probe development, namely the above-referenced 5358 bp sequence, a 3847 bp sequence (coordinates 819757 and 823604), a 3785 bp sequence (coordinates 843271 and 847056), and a 3130 bp sequence (coordinates 874990 and 878120). In the next step, the long PCR technique was used to amplify portions of the four identified single copy intervals. The technique followed for amplification of the 5358 bp interval is described in detail below. Similar techniques were followed for amplification of the remaining three single copy intervals. Probes of maximal length were desired for FISH experiments. However, in order to optimize the PCR reaction that generated these probes, other constraints had to be met, which resulted in amplification products somewhat shorter than the entire non-repetitive sequence interval. The Prime computer program was employed to optimize the selection of primers for PCR (Genetics Computer Group software package, Madison WI). The PCR primers which were optimized for long PCR were constrained as follows: size of 30-35 nucleotides; GC content of 50-80%; melting temperature of 65-70 °C; the primer was not permitted to self-anneal at the 3' end with hairpins of greater than 8 nucleotides; the primer was not permitted to self-anneal at any position with greater than 14; and the primer was permitted to anneal only at a single position in the target sequence and primer-primer annealing was limited at the 3' end to less than 8 bp and at any other point less than 14 bp. In addition, certain constraints were applied to the amplified PCR product in order to optimize long PCR: length of 5100-5358 nucleotides; GC content of 40-60%; melting temperature of 70-95 °C; difference in forward and reverse primer melting points less than 2°C. This yielded a possible 517 forward primers and 382 reverse primers, and a total of 928 possible products. The Prime program using the foregoing constraints rank ordered potential primer pairs. The top ranked primers were selected for synthesis, as set forth in the following Table 2. These primers were commercially produced (Oligos, Etc., Wilsonville, OR). Table 2 Using these primers, a long PCR reaction (50 μl) was performed using 1 microgram of high molecular weight genomic DNA (purified by phenol extraction) and 200 μM of each oligonucleotide primer to amplify the 5170 bp probe. Specifically, high fidelity DNA polymerase (LA-Taq, Takara Chemical Co.) was employed using the following thermal cycling protocol: Step 1 - 94 °C - 5 minutes Step 2 - 98°C - 20 seconds Step 3 - 65°C - 7 minutes Step 4 - 14 times to Step 2 Step 5 - 98°C - 20 seconds Step 6 - 65 °C - 7 minutes + 15 s/cycle Step 7 - 14 times to Step 5 Step 8 - 72°C - 10 minutes Step 9 - 0°C Step 10 - END Because amplification of the 5170 bp probe is less efficient than amplification of shorter fragments, the initial PCR reaction did not yield sufficient quantities of probe for multiple hybridization experiments. Therefore, a 4 μl aliquot of the original DNA amplification reaction was reamplifϊed using the following protocol: Step 1 - 94 °C - 1.5 minutes, followed by Steps 2-10 of the original PCR reaction. Sufficient quantities of the 5170 bp probe were obtained. An alternative to reamplification is to increase Step 7 by at least 10 cycles. The amplified product was then purified by gel electrophoresis followed by column chromatography. First, the amplified product was separated on a 0.8% Seakem LE agarose gel (FC Bioproducts) in IX modified TAE buffer. The gel was then stained with ethidium bromide and visualized with UN light. The fragment corresponding to the correct interval size was excised in an Ultrafree-DA spin column (Millipore) and centrifuged at 5000g for 10 minutes. The DΝA was recovered in solution and precipitated in 1/10 N ΝaOAc and 2.5 V 95% EtOH (overnight) at -20°C. The precipitated DΝA was then centrifuged, rinsed with cold 70% EtOH, air dried and resuspended in 20 μl of sterile deionized water. The DNA was checked on a 0.8% agarose gel (Sigma) to determine DNA concentration. The detailed probe labeling, hybridization, removal of non-specifically bound probe, and probe detection procedures are described by Knoll and Lichter, In: Dracopoli et al., (eds), "Current Protocols in Human Genetics Volume 1", Unit 4.3 (Green- Wiley, New York, 1994). Briefly, in order to label the probe, a standard nick translation reaction was carried out (Rigby et al, J Mol. Biol, 113:237-251, (1977)) using digoxigenin- 11-dUTP as the label. This yielded a series of overlapping 300-500 bp labeled fragments, which together comprised the 5170 bp probe. The labeled probe fragments were then precipitated by adding 1/10 V NaOAc plus 2.5 V 95% EtOH and carrier DNA (overnight, -20 °C). On the following day, the precipitated DNA was centrifuged, lyophilized, and resuspended in deionized sterile water at a concentration of 125 ng/20 μl. A comparison set of hybridizations were carried out with normal denatured human metaphase chromosomes, using the labeled probe fragments with and without blocking nucleic acid of the type described in U.S. Patents Nos. 5,447,841, 5,663,319 and 5,756,696. Twenty μl of resuspended labeled probe was then lyophilized and resuspended in 10 μl of deionized formamide and denatured for 5 minutes at 70-75 °C to yield single-stranded nucleic acids. For comparison, probes were pre-reacted with purified repetitive DNA by adding 125 ng (or 20 μl) of labeled probe to 10 micrograms of C 0 t 1 DNA (Life Technologies) and lyophilizing the mixture. This mixture was then denatured for 5 minutes at 70 °C followed by pre-reaction (or pre-annealing) for 30 minutes at 37 °C to convert the single stranded repetitive sequences in the probe to double stranded nucleic acid. This disables the hybridization between the sequences and the chromosome as target DNA template. Subsequently, the denatured probes with or without purified repetitive DNA (i.e., C 0 t 1) were mixed with 1 V prewarmed hybridization solution (comprised of 4 x SSC/2 mg/ml nuclease free bovine serum albumin/20% dextran sulfate/30% sterile deionized water) and overlaid onto denatured target DNA. The chromosomal target DNA, fixed to a microscope slide had been denatured at 72 °C for 2 minutes in 50% formamide/2 x SSC. A coverslip was placed over the probe hybridization mixture on the slide, sealed with nail polish enamel to prevent evaporation and placed in a moist chamber at 39 °C overnight. Following hybridization, non-specifically bound probe was washed off with varying stringencies of salt concentration and temperature. The labeled probes, pre- reacted to disable repetitive sequence hybridization, and the probes without such pre- reaction were detected with rhodamine-labeled antibody to digoxigenin- 11-dUTP, using a conventional FISH protocol (Knoll and Lichter, Current Protocol in Human Genetics, Vol. 1, Unit 4.3, Green-Wiley, New York, 1994). Chromosomal DNA was counterstained with DAPI. The cell preparations on microscope slides were then mounted in antifade solution (such as Vectashield, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and visually examined using a fluorescence microscope with the appropriate fluorochrome filter sets. Figs. 1 and 2 are photographs illustrating the results of the comparative hybridizations, where Fig. 1 is the hybridization with the blocking repetitive sequences, while Fig.2 is the hybridization without pre-reaction with purified repetitive DNA. These photographs depict hybridization to both HIRA alleles on two normal chromosome 22ql 1.2 regions. A comparison of the photographs demonstrates that the presence of the blocking repetitive sequences is unnecessary using the probes of the present invention. The remaining three probes identified in Table 2 were PCR-amplified and labeled as described above. These probes were used in a series of FISH experiments to determine the efficacy of the probes. Thus, all four probes were used together without pre-annealing of potentially repetitive sequences (Fig. 6), and a combination of the three shortest probes were used on cells from a patient affected with DiGeorge/VCFS with a previously confirmed deletion (Fig. 12). In the Fig. 6 photograph, the probe was hybridized to a single region of both chromosome 22s in a normal individual (arrows) In Fig. 12, only one chromosome 22 hybridized (arrow). The other chromosome 22, as indicated by a star, has a deletion of this region and does not hybridize to the probe. Example 2 Development of NECDLN and CDC2L1 Gene Probes The techniques described in Example 1 were used to develop a series of probes for detecting known genetic disorders on chromosome 1 (Monosomy lp36.3 syndrome; Slavotinek et al, J Med. Genet., 36:657-63 (1999)) and on chromosome 15 (Prader- Willi and Angelman Syndromes). Approximately 70% of patients with Prader-Willi or Angelman syndrome exhibit hemizygous deletions of the sequence containing the NECDIN gene (Knoll et al, Amer. J Med. Genet, 32:285-290 (1989); Nicholls et al, ^ 4mer. J Med. Genet, 33:66-77 (1989)). The presence of excess copies of this gene is diagnostic for an abnormal phenotype in patients with interstitial duplication or a supernumerary derivative or dicentric chromosome 15 (Cheng et al., Amer. J. Hum. Genet, 55:753-7 '59, (1994); Repetto et al.,^m. J Med. Genet, 79:82-89, (1998)). The following Table 3 sets forth the deduced single copy intervals, PCR primer coordinates, SEQ ID Nos., and the lengths of the resultant probes. Table 3 'Two sets of primers were used to generate two DNA probe fragments which, together, spanned the entire interval. PCR-amplification was performed using the CDC2L1 primers in Table 3, and products were labeled, hybridized and detected as set forth in Example 1. The labeled probes were used in a series of FISH experiments, with images of the hybridizations provided as Figs. 7-10. In the experiment shown in Fig. 7, the longest 4823 bp probe was employed and potential hybridization repetitive sequences was disabled by pre- annealing with purified repetitive DNA. As a comparison, the same probe was used without pre-annealing of purified repetitive DNA (Fig. 8). The hybridizations appear identical demonstrating that the presence of purified repetitive DNA to block repetitive sequence hybridization is unnecessary. In both instances, the chromosomes with one or both chromatids hybridized are indicated by arrows. In the experiments shown in Figs. 9 and 10, the 4823 bp and 4724 bp probes were employed, with (Fig. 9) and without (Fig. 10) pre-annealing of the purified repetitive DNA. Again, pre-reaction of the purified repetitive DNA is shown to be unnecessary using the probes of the invention. The NECDIN probes were also used in a series of FISH experiments, as shown in Figs.3-5 and 11. These probes detected DNA sequences between 36 and 62 kb distal of the NECDIN gene. The 3544 bp probe (SEQ ID Nos. 437-438) detected the 3* terminus of the MAGEL2 gene. In Fig. 3, the 3544 bp probe was used on metaphase cells from a normal individual, with pre-annealing using purified repetitive sequences; Fig.4 is a comparison, without pre-annealing. In Fig. 11 , all three probes were used in combination, on metaphase cells from a patient affected with Prader-Willi syndrome known to harbor a deletion of 15qll-ql3 sequences on one chromosome 15. The normal homolog is indicated by an arrow and shows hybridization to a single chromatid. The location of the deleted chromosome is indicated by a star. It does not show hybridization with the probe. The foregoing examples demonstrate that the mixed combinations of DNA fragments give identical hybridization results, as compared with the fragments when used individually. This establishes that none of the fragments used individually or in combination will hybridize to any other location in the genome and hence, are free of repetitive sequences. This provides an additional confirmation of the validity of the present method for the design and production of single copy genomic probes. Current use of commercial and research genomic probes to detect these disorders requires that hybridization of repetitive sequences be disabled prior to annealing of the probe to metaphase or interphase chromosomes. This increases the number of steps required to perform the protocol and could potentially increase the chances of procedural errors occurring, any of which would be unacceptable in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. The results present in Fig. 7 are comparable to those obtained using related commercially available genomic probes to detect these abnormalities. Hence, these probes will be useful in the detection of these genetic disorders. The probes themselves or in combination with other solutions necessary for hybridization and detections can be provided to clinical laboratories as kits for detection of these genetic disorders. The probes developed from genomic sequences other than those presented as examples cited herein can also be utilized to detect inherited, sporadic, or acquired cl romosomal rearrangements. These rearrangements may correspond to numerous other known genetic abnormalities (including neoplasias) and syndromes besides those examples given above. Hence, the present invention can also be useful for producing probes from genomic regions where no commercial probes are available or the probes are imprecise. In principle, the present method can be utilized to design, develop and produce single-copy genomic probes for any genomic interval where the DNA sequence is available and where a comprehensive set of repetitive sequence elements in the genome has been cataloged. Such catalogs are currently available for genomes for the following organisms (http://www.girinst.org): Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Arabidopsis thaliana, Canorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, andDanio rerio. Example 3 In this example, a number of probes specific to additional genetic disorders and cytogenetic abnormalities were developed using the principles of the invention. Software was also developed and improved to expedite the process of designing single copy probes (findi.pl, prim_wkg, and prim, referred to above and provided on the accompanying CD-R). The probes were subsequently tested and their utility confirmed by in situ hybridization. Identification of single copy sequences. The locations of single copy probe sequences are determined directly from long contiguous genomic DNA sequences. The locations were determined by software that aligns the sequences of repetitive sequence family members with the target genomic sequence. Comparison of the target sequence with previously determined sequences of repetitive family members served to identify and delineate the bounds of repetitive elements within the target. The computer program, RepeatMasker (http://ftp.genome.washing-ton.edu/RM/RepeatMasker.html: Smit A.F.A. & GreenP., unpublished results), was used to determine the locations of repetitive sequence families in contiguous genomic sequences, usually ~100 kb in length. RepeatMasker compares a genomic sequence with a compilation of repetitive sequence families present in multiple copies in the human genome (http://www.girinst.org/~server/repbase.html). This repeat sequence database contains representative and consensus sequences for the majority of human repetitive sequence families. The database can be expanded by addition of newly discovered repetitive sequence families (as shown in Example 6). A Perl script (findi.pl) parsed the coordinates of the boundaries of the repetitive segments from RepeatMasker output, and then deduced and sorted the adjacent single copy intervals by size greater than a parametrized threshold (~2 kb, in most instances). This script determines the locations and lengths of single copy intervals sorted by size from the output file (with the suffix: .out) produced by RepeatMasker, which contains a table of locations and lengths of repeat family elements. The boundaries of adjacent single copy intervals were deduced by subtracting one nucleotide position from the upstream boundary of a repetitive element and adding one nucleotide position to the downstream boundary of the previous element. Single copy intervals with identical upstream and downstream coordinates (1 bp in length) were considered to be adjacent repetitive sequences. Probe sequences were then compared with the human genome sequence database (Altschul et al, J Mol. Biol, 215:403-410 (1990)) to determine if there was similarity to sequences elsewhere in the genome (such as duplicons or triplicons or other less well conserved intervals). Probe sequences that are weakly conserved elsewhere in the genome do not cross-hybridize to those targets. Oligonucleotide primers were selected for PCR amplification of the longest single copy intervals. A Unix wrapper script (prim_wkg) iteratively modifies the switches in the file containing the command to design primers (prim), thus optimizing primer selection by changing the following parameters for input to the program, Prime (Genetics Computer Group; Madison, WT): T m (from 70-60°C), G/C composition (from 55-40%), and minimum interval length (from 90%-80% of the length of the single copy interval). Probe generation and chromosomal in situ hybridization. DNA fragments were amplified by long PCR (Cheng et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A., 91:5695-5699 (1994)) with LA-Taq as recommended by the manufacturer (Panvera, Madison, WI). Other enzymes for long PCR have been demonstrated to produce comparable results, including those manufactured by Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN; Stratagene, LaJolla, CA; andlnvitrogen, Carlsbad, CA. The amplicons were purified by low-melt temperature agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by chromatography with Micro-con 100 columns (Millipore, Bedford MA), which removed contaminating extension products containing repetitive sequences. Probe fragments were labeled by nick translation using modified nucleotides such as digoxigenin-dUTP or biotin-dUTP (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Labeled probes were denatured and hybridized to fixed chromosomal preparations on microscope slides using previously described conditions (Knoll and Lichter, Current Protocols in Human Genetics, Vol. 1, Unit 4.3, Green- Wiley, New York (1994)), with the exception that preannealing of the probe(s) with repetitive DNA (such as C 0 tl DNA) was not utilized in a parallel set of hybridizations. Probes from a single chromosome region of ~100kb were hybridized individually or in combination to remove nonspecific binding. Post-hybridization washes were performed at 42°C in 50% formamide in 2xSSC, followed by an additional wash at 39°C 2xSSC and one in lxSSC at room temperature. Wash stringency was increased, if necessary, to remove hybridization of probes to related sequences elsewhere in the genome. Hybridized probes were detected with a fluorochrome (such as rhodamine or fluorescent) tagged antibody to the modified nucleotide. Chromosome identification was performed by counterstaining the cellular DNA with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Hybridized chromosomes were viewed with an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, Melville, NY) equipped with a motorized multi-excitation fluorochrome filter wheel. Hybridization patterns on at least 20 metaphases (and 50-100 nuclei) were scored for each probe or combination of probes, with and without preannealing to C 0 tl DNA. Cells were imaged using a CCD camera (Cohu, Inc, San Diego, CA) and Cyto Vision ChromoFluor software (Applied Imaging, Santa Clara, CA). Table 4 sets forth the data generated using the foregoing procedure, with respect to a number of probes specific to known disorders and cytogenetic abnormalities. The abnormality designation makes use of standardized nomenclature as set forth in ISCN 1995, An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (1995), Mittelman F, ed. Table 4 1 ulB is -160 kb upstream from the PWS shortest region of overlap and -85 kb upstream from the AS shortest region of overlap. 2 Probe also cross-hybridizes to a sequence found on the p arm of acrocentric chromosomes. Probe sequence is not found in public repetitive sequence database. Probe also cross-hybridizes to an interspersed repetitive sequence family that is not found in the public repetitive sequence database. ' PM5 is -1.3 mb telomeric of MYHl 1 gene, which is disrupted at the inv(16p) breakpoint. PLA2G10 is -200 kb telomeric of PM5. 5 Probe was hybridized in combination with other probes and not individually. 6 Probe is downstream and adjacent to PAFAHIBI gene (formerly known as LISl). An expressed transcript homologous to EIF-3 is found at these coordinates. Example 4 In this example, a more precise chromosomal breakpoint determination was made using the probes of the invention. Structural chromosome rearrangements can be inherited in genetic disease or acquired as in the case of certain cancers. They can occur within a single chromosome (such as an inversion, deletion or duplication) or between homologous or non-homologous chromosomes (i.e. translocations). With the probes of the invention, the precise region of breakage can be determined at a previously unprecedented level of resolution. Such resolution permits detection of genes or sequences that are disrupted in the formation of the rearrangement and may provide insight into etiology, prognosis and/or treatment. In inherited contiguous gene syndromes, precise localization of chromosome breakpoints can define the extent of deletion or duplication and hence the prognosis of the disorder (Cheng et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet., 55:753-759 (1994)). The following example illustrates how the single copy probes hereof provide more precise information than commercially available cloned probes for the same chromosomal region. Inmost cases of chronic adult myeloid leukemia (CML; 90%) and in some cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; 25-30% adults; 2-10% children) (Perkins et al., Cancer Genet. Cytogenet, 96(1): 64-80 (1997); Rubintz et al., J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol, 20 (1):1-11 (1998)), a reciprocal translocation between chromosome 9q34 and 22ql 1.2 is evident (Rowley, Nature, 243:290-392 (1973)). The abnormal or derivative chromosome 22 that results from this translocation fuses the ABLl oncogene on chromosome 9 to the BCR (breakage cluster region) promoter on chromosome 22. The ABLl oncogene is expressed as either a 6 or a 7 kb mRNA transcript with alternatively spliced first exons, exons lb and la respectively, spliced to the common exons 2-11. Exon lb is -250 kb proximal of exon 1 a and this very long intron is a primary target for translocations. In CML, the ABLl gene is translocated from chromosome 9 to the promoter of the BCR gene on chromosome 22 to produce a chimeric BCR-ABL1 protein (Bernards, etal, Mol. Cell. Biol, 7:3231-3236; (1987). The BCR gene contains 24 exons and encodes a 160kD protein. The BCR breakpoints differ in CML and ALL. In CML, most breakpoints occur within the 5.8 kb major breakpoint cluster region (M- BCR) which corresponds to exons 12 through 17 (or bl through b5); whereas in most ALL, the BCR gene breaks between exons 1 and 2 (minor or m-BCR). Thus different molecular rearrangements resulting in differently-sized proteins occur in each disorder. These rearrangements can be distinguished with the probes of the invention. At the DNA level, dual color-dual probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) strategies are available to detect the BCR-ABL1 translocation on metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei (Bentzetal.,E/oo6?, 83:1922-1928 (1994); Sinclair et al., Blood, 90:1395-1402 (1997); Buno et al., Blood, 92:2315-2321 (1998)). With conventional FISH, the initial strategy was to have the probe for the ABLl oncogene region (distal of the breakpoint and ~200kb in size) detected in one color (i.e., red) and the BCR region (proximal of the breakpoint) in another color (i.e., green). Thus, in derivative chromosome 22 positive cells, one red and one green signal co-localized to give a yellow hybridization signal indicating the presence of a derivative 22 chromosome while the normal chromosome 9 and chromosome 22 remained as independent red and green signals. More recently, larger cloned DNA probes that span both sides of the ABLl translocation breakpoint have been utilized for detecting translocations. In this strategy, the part of the probe that is proximal to the breakpoint remains on the abnormal chromosome 9 and the part distal to the breakpoint co- localizes with BCR as in the previous strategy. This results in an extra signal (ES) on the translocated chromosome 9 and is the strategy behind the BCR- ABL 1 ES dual-color translocation probe (Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, IL) that many clinical cytogenetics laboratories use (Herens et al, Br. J. Haem., 110(1):214-216 (2000); Sinclair et al, Blood, 95(3):738-744 (2000)). In the ES system, the ABLl probe cocktail spans a genomic target significantly larger than the ABLl gene. This cocktail extends from arginosuccinate synthetase gene (ASS), wliich is -250 kb upstream from ABLl , through the ABLl gene and several kb downstream. Several single copy probes were designed for ABLl and BCR by identifying the boundaries of single copy intervals at these loci. Figs. 13 and 14 indicate the locations of potential single copy probes within the BCR and ABLl loci, respectively. Eleven intervals exceeding 2 kb length are distributed throughout the BCR gene, 5 of which have been currently designed as probes. A similar number of additional shorter single copy regions in this gene (between 1.5 and 2.0 kb) could be combined to more precisely delineate translocation breakpoints . In the ABL 1 gene, 10 intervals > 2kb are found, six of which have been designed as probes. Multiple single copy probes for both BCR (Fig. 13) and ABLl (Fig. 14) have been deduced and oligonucleotide primer sets derived. For BCR, these probes discriminate between the minor (Fig. 13) and major breakpoints (Fig. 13 and SEQ ID Nos. 510-515). Conventional FISH testing with BCR-ABLl ES probe does not distinguish between rearrangements at the major (M) and minor (m) breakpoints in the BCR gene. A mixture of m-BCR probes detects the minor breakpoint often seen in patients with ALL, and those designated M-BCR (SEQ ID Nos. 510-515) detect the major breakpoint evident in most patients with CML. If all of the probes translocate to the chromosome 9, then the gene is interrupted at the minor breakpoint. If only the M- BCR probes translocate from chromosome 22 to the derivative chromosome 9 and the m-BCR probes remain on the derivative chromosome 22, then the gene is interrupted at the major breakpoint. For ABLl, two of the probes are predicted to be proximal of the breakpoint (SEQ ID Nos. 516/517 and 518/519), and the others are distal to the breakpoint (SEQ ID Nos. 520 through 531). Hybridizationof three ABLl probes distal to the breakpoint in CML shows that the probes have moved to the derivative chromosome 22 (Fig. 15), whereas a combination of five ABLl probes that span the breakage interval demonstrates that some probes remain on the derivative chromosome 9 while others move to the derivative chromosome 22 (Fig. 16). Based on these results and the positions of these probes, it can be deduced that the breakpoint interval spans positions 11004 bp through 65951 bp ofFig. 14. It will be evident to one skilled in the art that the region of breakage can be more precisely refined by hybridizing probes from the single copy intervals between Seq. ID Nos. 519 and 520. The exact location at the breakpoint can be then determined from the genomic sequence of the refined breakage region. Recent studies (Herens et al, Br. J. Haem., 110:214-216 (2000)) utilizing the commercially available ES probe have demonstrated that ~10% of CML patients do not have an extra hybridization signal on the derivative chromosome 9 because sequences are deleted upstream of the ABLl gene. In some instances, the deletions extend as far as the ASS gene and such a deletion is associated with poor prognosis (e.g., blast crisis). These large FISH probes are not useful for detecting interstitial deletions in the region between ASS and ABLl, as evidenced by an increased deletion detection rate of up to 1/3 of CML patients when shorter probes of -100-200 kb are hybridized (Sinclair et al, Blood, 95(3):738-744(2000)). Since some patients harbor deletions of sequences proximal to the ABLl breakpoint on the derivative or translocated chromosome 9, single copy probes are being used to delineate the extent of hemizygosity in this chromosomal region. Correlation of deletion breakpoints with clinical outcomes will determine if the loss of specific genes in this chromosonal interval is prognostic for clinical findings such as early blast crisis. Example 5 This example demonstrates that increased hybridization signals can be generated using probe sequences from duplicated genomic domains. Several single copy probe sequences were designed, which were a part of highly similar duplicon or triplicon domains as previously described. Several probes from chromosome 16p 13.1 (SEQ ID Nos. 536-543), close to the inversion breakpoint in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia - Type M4, contain sequences that are a near perfect triplication of sequences in this region. In the genome draft sequence, two of these domains are tandemly arranged, separating the probe sequences by 40 kb, and a third telomeric interval is separated by 1.2 mb. The sequences of the three intervals differ by only ~1.5%. Hybridization with this probe demonstrated two clustered, but clearly separable signals. One hybridization corresponds to the combined first and second paralogs and the other to the third copy of this sequence. A probe from the chromosome 17pll.2 interval that is commonly deleted in Smith-Magenis Sydrome (SEQ ID Nos. 586-587) contained a near-perfect triplication. The probe was intended to detect a deletion within a near single-copy sequence in IVS4 of the SHMT1 gene. However, two paralogous subsequences separated by -15 kb, exhibiting 99.8% identity with the SMHT1 sequence, were also detected in the genome draft between the ZNF127 and PAIP1 genes -2.7 mb centromeric but also within the genetic interval commonly deleted in patients with this disorder. Due to the proximity of these sequences to the chromosome 17 centromere (which is a highly condensed region), a single hybridization locus was observed. Two probes from the Down syndrome critical region (SEQ ID Nos. 504/505- 508/509) were each embedded in the same large duplicon, which was > 80 kb in length. These duplicated sequences are separated by 1.1 mb, and reside, respectively at the centromeric and telomeric ends of chromosome band 21 q22.2. Despite the fact that the duplicated sequences were separated by 1.1 mb, a single hybridization signal was detected in this region of chromosome 21 using each probe. Therefore, this region of chromosome 21, like chromosome 17pl l.2, seems more condensed in metaphase chromosomes than sequences in 16p 13.1, in which duplicated regions separated by similar distances were distinguishable. Single copy probes developed from such regions, of course, lack known repetitive sequence elements. However the probes generally hybridize to all of the paralogous copies, since each of the copies remain hybridized even under the most stringent hybridization wash conditions. Because multiple, tightly clustered sites on the chromosome are hybridized in a specific interval, the hybridization signal produced from these hybridizations is brighter than that expected from a comparable probe sequence which was represented once per haploid genome. Thus, these genomic duplicons or triplicons increase the effective target size of the probe. This implies that shorter probes from such regions can produce hybridization signals comparable in intensity to those generated by longer probes. Selection of shorter probes from duplicated genomic domains will be particularly useful for development of probes for genomic regions where long single copy intervals are underrepresented. Example 6 The increasing availability of accurate draft human genome sequences has facilitated development of single copy probes in accordance with the invention for many previously inaccessible chromosomal regions. Although the most current comprehensive up-to-date sequence databases have been used to detect repetitive elements (http://www.girinst.org/repbase) present in these draft sequences, hybridization of single copy probes to metaphase chromosomes has revealed that several probes contain previously unrecognized repetitive sequences. This was determined by documenting hybridization of a probe to the homologous chromosomal band where it is known to be mapped as well as other locations not found in the draft genome sequence. The draft genome sequence is incomplete, with -90% of the euchromatic genome having been sequenced (International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome, Nature, 409:860-922, (2001). It was anticipated that some repetitive sequence families, especially those present among the missing sequences, would have not been detected. Despite screening for known repetitive sequences, several euchromatic single copy probes appear to contain homologs of repetitive sequence families that are predominantly found in multiple copies on the short arms of acrocentric chromosomes (chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21, and 22). These probes included three sequences derived from the Down Syndrome critical region on chromosome 21 (amplified with SEQ ID Nos. 504/505, 506/507 and 508/509), two sequences from chromosome 16pl3.1 that straddle the site of chromosomal inversion in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Type M4 (amplified with SEQ ID Nos. 536/537 and 538/539). Such chromosomal domains, termed nucleolar organizer regions, are known to contain thousands of copies of the ribosomal RNA cistrons arranged in long tandem arrays (Sylvester et al, Hum. Genet.,; 73:193-8 (1986)). The human genome draft genome sequence is devoid of contiguous sequences from these chromosomal regions. The International Sequencing Consortium eliminated clones containing these and other tandemly repeated sequences (e.g., heterochromatin) from consideration early in the sequencing effort, since it was recognized that any assembly of sequences from such clones would be ambiguous, and thus unreliable. Other sequences distinct from, but co- localizing with, ribosomal RNA genes would most likely also be tandemly arranged in chromosomal nucleolar organizer regions. Because of the lack of sequence information from these intervals, the distribution of sequences within them that are related to sequences elsewhere in the genome has not been previously appreciated. While single copy FISH with these probes demonstrated localization to the expected euchromatic intervals, additional significant hybridization to the short arms of several acrocentric chromosomes was seen. Addition of C 0 t 1 DNA prior to hybridization removed cross- hybridization to these repetitive sequences. These additional signals are consistent with tandemly organized multiple copies of sequences related to the probe on short arms of acrocentric chromosomes. In addition, hybridization of presumed single copy probes to interspersed repetitive sequence families was detected, despite the fact that these probes were filtered for repetitive sequences using RepeatMasker software. One probe, mapping to chromosome 17pl l.2, within the interval commonly deleted in Smith-Magenis syndrome (amplified with SEQ ID No. 586/587), was found to cross-hybridize with interspersed repeats. Sequences close to the translocation breakpoint at chromosome 9q34 (amplified with SEQ ID Nos. 518/519 and 526/527) also potentially contain interspersed repetitive sequences, based on hybridization of combinations of these probes with another probe from this region. The hybridization signals at the mapped locations for these probes were not stronger than those observed for the cross- hybridizing sequences, nor were the cross-hybridizing sequences removed by increasing the stringency during the washing procedures. This suggests that the probes contain previously unrecognized repetitive sequence families, rather than highly divergent copies of known interspersed repeats (whose failure to be recognized by RepeatMasker software would have led to their inadvertent inclusion in the designed probe). Although all of these probes appear to contain members of previously unrecognized repetitive sequences families, the probes themselves are likely to be composed of both single copy and repetitive sequences. It is feasible to separate these sequence components by iterative hybridization of different PCR-generated subsets of each probe sequence to chromosomal DNA. However, since each entire probe sequence is known, the sequence can be added to the repeat sequence database used to develop new, additional single copy probes. The probe sequences are not lengthy (some interspersed repeat families are, in fact, longer, e.g., LI, than the longest single copy probe); therefore, minimal additional computational overhead is incurred by addition of these sequences to the database of human repetitive sequence families. The addition of these previously unknown repetitive sequence family members results in a more comprehensive repetitive sequence database, that in turn improves the design of single copy probes. Single copy probes subsequently designed using the larger repeat sequence database, will not contain these novel repetitive sequences. This heuristic algorithm improves the purity of single copy sequences in single copy probes. Generally speaking, the invention thus provides a method of determining the existence of previously unknown repeat sequence families in a genome. This method involves reacting a labeled, putative single copy nucleic acid probe with the genome, and causing the probe to hybridize. If the probe hybridizes at more than three different locations (and preferably at more than ten different locations), then it is likely that a new, previously unknown repeat sequence has been found. All references cited above are expressly incorporated by reference herein. In addition, the subject matter of Disclosure Document #471449 filed March 27, 2000, is also incorporated by reference herein.

Claims: We claim: 1. A nucleic acid hybridization probe comprising a labeled, single copy nucleic acid which will hybridize to a deduced single copy sequence interval in target nucleic acid of known sequence, said nucleic acid probe having a length of at least about 50 nucleotides. 2. The probe of claim 1, said probe including a plurality of different, labeled nucleic acids each of which will hybridize to respective deduced single copy sequence intervals in said target nucleic acid, each of said nucleic acid probes having a length of at least about 50 nucleotides. 3. The probe of claim 1 , said nucleic acid probe having a length of at least 100 nucleotides. 4. The probe of claim 3 , said nucleic acid probe having a length of at least about 2000 nucleotides. 5. The probe of claim 1 , said target nucleic acid being selected from the group consisting of DNA, RNA and mRNA. 6. The probe of claim 5, said target nucleic acid being DNA. 7. The probe of claim 1, said nucleic acid probe being single stranded. 8. The probe of claim 1, said probe being essentially free of blocking nucleic acid sequences which will hybridize to repeat sequences within the genome of which said target nucleic acid is a part. 9. The probe of claim 1 , said nucleic acid probe being labeled with a label selected from the group consisting of fluorochrome-responsive labels, fluorochromes, colorimetric chemical, conjugated proteins, antibodies, antigens, and mixtures thereof. 10. The probe of claim 9, said nucleic acid probe being labeled with a fluorochrome-responsive label. 11. The probe of claim 1 , there being at least about 80% sequence identity between said probe and a sequence which is a complement to said target sequence. 12. The probe of claim 11 , said probe being complementary to said target sequence. 13. In a hybridization method including the steps of preparing a reaction mixture comprising a target nucleic acid sequence and a nucleic acid probe which hybridizes to at least a portion of said target nucleic acid sequence, and causing said probe to hybridize to said target nucleic acid sequence, the improvement which comprises using as said probe a labeled, single copy nucleic acid which hybridizes to a deduced single copy sequence interval in target nucleic acid of known sequence, said nucleic acid probe having a length of at least about 50 nucleotides. 14. The method of claim 13, said probe including a plurality of different, labeled nucleic acids each of which hybridizes to respective deduced single copy sequence intervals in said target nucleic acid, each of said nucleic acid probes having a length of at least about 50 nucleotides. 15. The method of claim 13 , said nucleic acid probe having a length of at least 100 nucleotides. 16. The method of claim 15, said nucleic acid probe having a length of at least about 2000 nucleotides. 17. The method of claim 13 , said target nucleic acid being selected from the group consisting of DNA, RNA and mRNA. 18. The method of claim 17, said target nucleic acid being DNA. 19. The method of claim 13, said nucleic acid probe being single stranded. 20. The method of claim 13, said probe being essentially free of blocking nucleic acid sequences which hybridizes repeat sequences within the genome of which said target nucleic acid is a part. 21. The method of claim 13, said nucleic acid probe being labeled with a label selected from the group consisting of fluorochrome-responsive labels, fluorochromes, colorimetric chemical, conjugated proteins, antibodies, antigens, and mixtures thereof. 22. The method of claim 21, said nucleic acid probe being labeled with a fluorochrome-responsive label. 23. The method of claim 13, said hybridization method selected from the group consisting of in situ hybridization, Southern blot, and other methods in which nucleic acid is immobilized. 24. The method of claim 13, there being at least about 80% sequence identity between said probe and a sequence which is a complement to said target sequence. 25. The method of claim 24, said probe being complementary to said target sequence. 26. A method of developing a hybridization probe for a target nucleic acid sequence forming a part of a genome, said method comprising the steps of: determining the sequence of at least one single copy sequence in said target nucleic acid sequence; and developing a hybridization probe which hybridizes to at least a part of said single copy sequence. 27. The method of claim 26, including the steps of: determining the sequence of said target nucleic acid sequence; determining the repeat sequences found in said genome; and comparing said sequence of said target nucleic acid sequence and said repeat sequences in order to determine said sequence of said at least one single copy sequence. 28. The method of claim 26, said probe developing step comprising the steps of obtaining at least a part of said single copy sequence, and purifying said part of said single copy sequence. 29. The method of claim 28, said purifying step comprising carrying out PCR. 30. The method of claim 26, including the step of labeling said hybridization probe. 31. The method of claim 26, target nucleic acid sequence and said probe being DNA. 32. The method of claim 26, said hybridization probe having at least about 80% sequence identity with said single copy sequence. 33. The method of claim 32, said hybridization probe being complementary to single copy sequence. 34. A DNA sequence having at least about 80% sequence identity with a member selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos. 429-446. 35. The DNA sequence of claim 34, said sequence having at least about 90% sequence identity. 36. A DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos. 429-446 and 480-613. 37. A DNA sequence having at least about 80% sequence identity with a PCR-amplifϊed sequence produced using as PCR primers adjacent pairs of the sequences identified as SEQ ID Nos.429-446 and 480-613, beginning with SEQ ID No. 429. 38. The sequence of claim 37, there being at least about 90% sequence identity. 39. A method of determining the existence of previously unknown repeat sequence families in a genome, comprising the steps of reacting a labeled, putative single copy nucleic acid probe with the genome, causing the probe to hybridize, and ascertaining if the probe hybridizes to the genome at more than three different locations as a determination of a new repeat sequence family. 40. The method of claim 39, including the step of ascertaining if the probe hybridizes at more than ten different locations. 41. The probe of claim 1 , said nucleic acid derived from a duplicon or triplicon sequence interval. 42. The method of claim 13, including the step of selecting a single copy nucleic acid which will hybridize to a duplicon or triplicon sequence domain. 43. The method of claim 26, said determining step comprising the step of selecting said single copy sequence from a duplicon or triplicon sequence domain. 44. A method of determining a chromosome breakpoint, comprising the steps of: providing a pair of separate, labeled, single copy nucleic acid probes of predetermined sequence and designed to respectively hybridize on opposite sides of said breakpoint; reacting said pair of probes with a chromosomal target sequence containing said breakpoint, and causing the probes to hybridize to the target sequence; and detecting said hybridized probes as a way of ascertaining the location of said breakpoint. 45. The method of claim 44, including the step of providing a plurality of separate, labeled, single copy nucleic acid probes of predetermined sequence designed to hybridize on one side of said breakpoint, and providing a plurality of separate, labeled, single copy nucleic acid probes of predetermined sequence designed to hybridize on the other side of said breakpoint.

Inventors: CAZARRO PATRICIA M, KNOLL JOAN H M, ROGAN PETER K, CAZARRO, PATRICIA, M., KNOLL, JOAN, H., M., ROGAN, PETER, K.
Applicants: CAZARRO PATRICIA M, CHILDREN S MERCY HOSPITAL, KNOLL JOAN H M, ROGAN PETER K, CAZARRO, PATRICIA, M., CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL, KNOLL, JOAN, H., M., ROGAN, PETER, K.
Application year: 2001
Main classification: C12N
IPC codes: C12N15, C12Q1, G01N21, G01N33