CALL HANDLING IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Abstract: The invocation of an intelligent network service in a call handler for calls being routed to mobile stations in a mobile communication network is done in such a way that if a call being handled is a call to be routed to a mobile station, and if it is determined that at least one intelligent network identifier is activated in said stored information, a further determination may be executed, where said further determination comprises comparing a stored comparison value of a mobile station condition parameter associated with a corresponding condition of the mobile station to which said call being handled is to be routed, with a current value of said mobile station condition parameter of said mobile station, and where said decision regarding the invocation of an intelligent network service depends on the outcome of said comparison.

Description: CALL HANDLING IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORK [Background of the Invention] Intelligent Network (IN) services have become commonplace in modern telephone systems. Such IN services greatly enhance the functionality of telephone systems beyond the classical concept of simply connecting a call originating terminal with a call destination terminal. The "intelligence" of an intelligent network consists in the capability of identifying certain calls as associated with certain services, such as call forwarding, call queuing, call holding, etc. The basic concept of intelligent network services is well known in the art and need not be described further here. One way of providing an IN technique that is flexible by not being fixedly bound to a telephone standard, is to provide a call handler that is arranged to receive network calls and apply routing information to such calls, where said call handler also checks if an IN service is to be invoked for a call, and if it is decided that an IN service is to be invoked, sending appropriate signals to an intelligent network service handler, which will then perform processing for providing the intelligent network, service. Providing IN services is especially popular in mobile telephone systems, and since competition in the field of mobile telephony is hard, mobile telephone operators want to achieve a competitive advantage over other operators by offering their own services, which are not specified by standards. For mobile telephone systems, the known technique of Customized Applications for Mobile network Enhanced Logic (CAMEL) is one example of a standardized way of offering IN techniques for mobile networks. CAMEL is designed for use with GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication) or UMTS (Universal Mobile Telephone Standard) . Fig. 3 shows a basic arrangement of a call handling system according to CAMEL. A GSM network 30 contains a gateway mobile switching center (GMSC) 10. Network 30 could equally well be a UMTS network. Reference numeral 100 indicates a call provided to the GMSC 10, such that routing information can be applied to said call. In order to do this, the GMSC 10 interrogates the home location register (HLR) 11, which stores information that relates to call destination information contained in a call being routed. Namely, the home location register 11 contains information associated with a given subscriber, and a call being routed contains information relating to a given subscriber. Typically this will be the directory number assigned to said subscriber. The GMSC 10 will then request routing information associated with said directory number by sending an appropriate signal 101 to the HLR 11. In GSM such a signal is also referred to as a send routing information (SRI) MAP message. The HLR 11 then sends back appropriate routing information with a signal 102. This routing information can be a simple roaming number, i.e. a number which identifies the mobile switching center (MSC) presently serving the identified mobile subscriber. On the other hand, if an appropriate IN identifier is activated for the given subscriber, then the HLR 11 will provide IN invocation information to the GMSC 10. If no IN invocation information is contained in signal 102, then the normal routing information (e.g. the roaming number) is applied to the call and this call is placed back into the network, which is indicated by arrow 107. It may be noted that full arrows represent content and signaling, while dotted arrows represent only signaling in Fig. 3. If IN invocation information is passed to the GMSC 10, then the GMSC 10 routes the call to an entity call gsmSSF (gsm Service Switching Function) 20. In the example of Fig. 3, the GMSC 10 and gsmSSF 20 are contained in a node 200 of network 30. The gsmSSF 20 then requests information from the so- called gsmSCF (gsm Service Control Function) 21. The gsmSCF 21 instructs the gsmSSF' on how to handle the call, and the appropriate IN service is executed. This is indicated by arrows 104 and 105. The gsmSSF 20 then carries out the instructions, which can e.g. consist in routing the call back to the GMSC, which in turn routes it back to the network, which is indicated by arrows 106 and 107. Naturally, this is only an example, as there is a multitude of IN services. . In other words, it would also be possible that the gsmSSF 20 could hold the call while an outgoing call is started to a different subscriber, for arranging a meeting or conference. A general problem with IN technology is the additional load in the network when all calls of IN subscribers have to be routed to the separate functional entity gsmSSF 20, and an additional procedure called IN triggering is required. IN triggering refers to the dialogue between the gsmSSF 20 and the gsmSCF 21. According to capacity calculations made with a default traffic model, an average load increase of IN invocation for a call can be quite considerable. The second phase of the CAMEL standard (CAMEL ph2) addresses this problem by introducing a method referred to as conditional triggering. For originating calls, this method allows the gsmSSF 20 to check certain call conditions, such as dialed number, basic service code or type of call, before IN triggering. For terminating calls, this method allows the HLR 11 to check the basic service code before returning IN data to the GMSC 10. In other words, it is possible to make IN invocation dependent on the call type. An example of this could be that voice calls are forwarded, but fax calls are not. Although conditional triggering reduces the network load, there is still a desire for greater load reduction. It may be noted that this desire not .only exists in connection with the specific example shown in Fig. 3, but in connection with any system that employs a call handler (consisting of the GMSC 10 and HRL 11 in the example of Fig. 3) and an intelligent network service handler (consisting of the gsmSSF 20 and " gsmSCF 21 in the example of Fig. 3), where the call handler is arranged to determine routing information and to perform an IN invocation under certain conditions . [Object of the invention] The object of the invention is to provide an improved call handler, improved call handling system and improved method of IN invocation in a call handler. [Summary of the Invention] This object is solved by a call handler according to claim 1, a call handling system according to claim 13 and a method of controlling the invocation of an intelligent network service in call handler according to claim 16. Advantageous embodiments are described in the dependent claims . In accordance with the present invention, the decision routine in the call handler, which makes a decision if an intelligent network service is to be invoked, has the capability of not only checking if an intelligent network identifier is activated in the stored information relating to a given call destination, e.g. relating to a specific subscriber, but has an additional capability. This additional capability comes into play if a call being handled is a call to be routed to a mobile station, i.e. a mobile terminating call, and if an intelligent network identifier is activated in the stored information being used for call handling. Namely, the additional determination comprises a step of comparing a stored comparison value of a mobile station condition parameter associated with a corresponding condition of the mobile station to which the call being handled is to be routed, with a current value of the mobile station condition parameter, where the decision regarding the invocation of an intelligent network service depends on the outcome of the comparison. In other words, the call handler is capable of making the decision regarding the invocation of an IN service dependent on a condition of the mobile station to which a call is to be routed. The condition of the mobile station used for the comparison can be an operating condition or a circumstantial condition (a condition relating to the circumstances of the mobile station) . An example of an operating condition is the status of the mobile station, which can be described in terms of the on/off state, the busy state or by a certain operating mode. Examples of circumstantial conditions are the location or the time (dynamic data). The location can be identified by one or more of a plurality of indicators, such as a country indicator, a network indicator or a cell indicator. The time can be identified by a date indicator or a clock indicator. Therefore, in contrast to the prior art, which only provided the possibility of conditional triggering with respect to characteristics of the call being handled, the present invention proposes a conditional triggering based on one or more conditions of the mobile station to which a call is being routed. This provides numerous advantages. For example, there exist so-called prepaid subscribers, which means that the subscriber pays for his subscription in advance and the costs of using the network are progressively deducted from the prepaid amount, e.g. in the form of a descending register on a SIM (Subscriber Identity Module) card in the mobile station itself. According to the existing technology, all calls to such prepaid subscribers have to be routed to the intelligent network service handler (i.e. the gsmSSF in the case of GSM) . This is a problem for such network operators who only wish to charge for the roaming call forwarding leg when roaming abroad, because they would like to avoid unnecessary IN triggering for calls to prepaid subscribers when these prepaid subscribers stay in their home PLMN (Public Land Mobile Network) . In accordance with the present invention, this problem can be solved by implementing the invention such that the condition of the mobile station for which a comparison is conducted, is the location. More specifically, in the above-mentioned example the condition parameter for which the comparison can be made can be the network identifier stored together with the subscriber information in the register storing subscriber information, such as the HLR in the case of GSM. Assuming that about 90 % of calls to prepaid subscribers are received when these subscribers are in their home PLMN, this means that a load reduction of 90 % of additional load caused by IN invocation with respect to such prepaid subscribers can be achieved with respect to the known technology. Another example where the present invention can be applied advantageously, is in the case of an IN service where the call destination is changed based on called subscriber status, such as busy or not reachable, and on the status idle, the call would always be routed normally. In the current technology, all calls of subscribers with such a service must be routed to the intelligent network service handler. By applying the present invention, it is possible to only invoke the IN service when this service is indeed necessary, e.g. when the mobile station is busy or not reachable. If the mobile station is idle, then the call is routed normally, without IN invocation. Due to the fact that on average the typical mobile terminal will be idle most of the time, such an implementation of the present invention again reduces the load due to IN invocation considerably. [Brief description of drawings] The present invention shall be explained in more detail in connection with preferred embodiments ' , which make reference to the appended drawings, in which: Fig. 1 shows a flow chart explaining a basic embodiment of the method of the present invention; Fig. 2 shows a block diagram representing a preferred embodiment of the call handling system of the present invention; and Fig. 3 shows a block diagram representing a call handling system according to GSM, to which the present invention can be applied. [Detailed description of preferred embodiments] Fig. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of a call handling system according to the present invention. A call handler 1 receives calls 100 and determines routing information for these calls. Reference numeral 3 represents a mobile communication network. The call handler 1 is for example a part of the network 3. On the other hand, an intelligent network service handler 2 is provided, which deals with such calls for which the call handler 1 invokes an intelligent network service. Preferably, the call handler consists of two parts, a first part 10 for receiving calls into the mobile network and forwarding calls in the network, according to the routing information, after the routing information has been applied to the calls. A second part 11 is a register or memory containing routing information and routines capable of associating destination or subscriber information extracted from a call with the appropriate routing information. The first part 10 signals call related information to the second part 11 (see arrow 101), and the second part 11 then instructs the first part 10 on the basis of the found routing information (arrow 102) . The call handler 1 additionally determines if an intelligent network service is to be invoked for a given call. This is done by checking if an intelligent network identifier is activated for a call being routed. For example, the subscriber information which is interrogated when determining the routing information can also contain predetermined data that indicates that the subscriber subscribes to an intelligent network service and can identify which service this is. If the processing in call handler 1 decides that an IN service is to be invoked, an appropriate action is taken in direction of IN service handler 2. In the example of Fig. 2 it is shown that the call is forwarded to the IN service handler 2 (arrow 103) . It may be noted that similar to Fig. 3, a full arrow in Fig. 2 represents a call (content and signaling) , while a dotted arrow represents only signaling. Regarding the example of Fig. 2, this means that if an IN service is to be invoked, then call handler 2 adds appropriate information to the call and forwards the call to IN service handler 2, where further processing occurs. However, it may be noted that it is also possible that the call handler 1 holds the call and only establishes a signaling connection with IN service handler 2, where information relating to the IN service invoked is communicated to the IN service handler, which in turn responds by sending back appropriate routing and control information. Returning to the example of Fig. 2, the IN service handler 2 receives the forwarded call 103 and then conducts appropriate processing that depends on the IN invocation information added to the call. If the result of the processing is a routing, the appropriately modified call is sent back to the call handler 1 (arrow 106) , which then forwards the call back into the network 3. IN service handler 2 preferably also consists of two parts, namely a first part 20 that receives the calls 103 from the call handler 1, and a second part 21 that performs the processing for determining the appropriate control information. The IN service handler 2 can be part of the mobile communication network 3, or can be separate therefrom. It may be noted that the depicted parts 10, 11, 20 and 21 are functional entities, which means that may be provided in one physical unit, but they can equally well be spread out over a plurality of physical units. Preferably the call handling system is arranged as shown in Fig. 3, namely as a system designed for GSM. Fig. 3 has already been described, and the same reference numerals as in Fig. 2 refer to corresponding elements, such that a repeated description is not necessary. However, it may be noted that the present invention naturally is applicable to any appropriate network system and any appropriate IN scheme. In other words, it is not restricted to GSM and CAMEL. For example, the network 3 could also conform to UMTS, and the IN invocation can then occur in any suitable corresponding fashion. Element 20 will then generally be referred to as a Service Switching Function (SSF) and element 21 as a Service Control Function (SCF) . Now the basic concept of the present invention shall be described by way of the example shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 shows a processing routine in the call handler 2, which determines if an intelligent network service is to be invoked or not if a call being routed is a mobile terminating call, i.e. the routing processing has determined that the destination of the call is a mobile station. In other words, the processing in the call handler jumps to this routine when the stage of processing is reached at which it is determined if an IN invocation is to take place or not for such mobile terminating calls. In a first step SI, it is determined if an intelligent network identifier is activated for the destination or subscriber under consideration. Namely, as already described previously, the first part 10 (GMSC 10) will have signaled an appropriate destination or subscriber indication (e.g. a directory number) to the second part 11, which preferably handles the processing shown in Fig. 1. If step SI determines that no IN identifier is activated, then the procedure branches to step S6, which means that no IN invocation takes place. The processing then returns to the main processing routine, which will continue without IN invocation. On the other hand, if step SI finds an activated IN identifier, step S2 is processed. S2 determines if a validity indicator is set for the activated IN identifier. The validity indicator can be a single bit or flag, which has the simple purpose of allowing the processing of steps S3 and S4 to be turned on or off in a very simple way. Namely, by adding the feature of the validity indicator it is not necessary to deactivate an IN identifier if it is desired to avoid the processing of steps S3 and S4. It is naturally simpler to enable or disenable the specific function of condition comparison by setting a single validity bit or flag, than to perform activation or deactivation routine for an IN identifier. However, it should be noted that step S2 is preferable but not necessary. If the validity indicator is set in step S2, step S3 is processed, where a stored condition parameter is compared with a current condition parameter. As already mentioned previously, the condition to which the parameter relates can be an operating condition or a circumstantial condition. The operating condition can e.g. be the status of the mobile station, in which case the related parameter can be an on/off indicator, a busy indicator or more generally an operating mode indicator. While the on/off indicator simply provides information whether the mobile station is switched on or off, and the busy indicator simply provides information whether the mobile station is busy, an operating mode indicator would have a plurality of states, where each state corresponds to an operating mode. As an example, it is possible that the mobile station could be run in three different modes, where a first mode is simply a paging mode, the second mode a telephone mode, and a third mode a multimedia mode. Namely, in the first mode the mobile station would only work as a pager, in the second mode as a regular telephone, and in the third mode as a full multimedia terminal. Naturally, other mode hierarchies are possible, and this is only an example. The condition relating to the condition parameter compared in step S3 could also be a circumstantial condition. Such a circumstantial condition could be the location. The condition parameter associated with the location can e.g. be a country indicator, a network indicator or a cell indicator (in the case of a cellular network) . Naturally, any other parameter indicative of the location could be used. The circumstantial condition could also be the time relating to the mobile station, i.e. the local time of the mobile station or a global time, such as Greenwich Mean Time. If the time is the condition, then a corresponding parameter could be a date indicator or a clock indicator. Subsequent to step S3, step S4 determines if the comparison of step S3 has resulted in a predetermined requirement being met. The predetermined requirement can be formulated positively (e.g. stored condition parameter = current condition parameter) or negatively (stored condition parameter ≠ current condition parameter) . If the predetermined condition is met, then an IN service is invoked (step S5) , and if not, then no IN service is invoked (step Sβ) . Thereafter, the determination routine returns to the main processing routine. The condition for which a comparison is conducted will typically depend on the IN service activated. Equally, the specific parameter (or parameters) compared will also be chosen in conjunction with the specific IN service. Due to the large number of very diverse IN services, a great number of possibilities exist. Equally, the predetermined requirement checked in step S4 will depend on the IN service activated, on the chosen condition and the chosen parameter (s) . Again, a large number of possibilities exist. For example, if the IN service is a call forwarding service to a mailbox, it is possible that this service is only invoked during certain times of day (e.g. from 8 p.m. to 8 a.m.), or only on workdays. Equally, it is possible that such a call forwarding service is only invoked if the subscriber is not within the cell belonging to his private home. In other words, the condition is the location, and the condition parameter is the cell identifier. The stored condition parameter would be the cell identifier belonging to the private home of the subscriber, and the predetermined requirement in step S4 would be that the current condition parameter is not equal to the stored condition parameter. Another example involving the location as a condition is the above-mentioned charging of the roaming call forwarding leg for prepaid subscribers, where the corresponding condition parameter would be the network identifier. A different example, which involves the operating condition would be using a busy indicator as a condition parameter, where the call forwarding function would only be invoked if the busy indicator shows the mobile station to be busy. Although the routine shown in Fig. 1 is a preferred example, a large number of variations and modifications are possible. For one thing, Fig. 1 only shows a basic routine exemplifying the invention, and other additional steps could be implemented in the procedure for determining if an intelligent network invocation is to be performed or not. For example, the known conditional triggering function of CAMEL ph2 is preferably also implemented. Moreover, although step SI only mentions one activated IN identifier, it is naturally also possible to determine if a number of IN identifiers are activated, where the routine shown by steps S2 to S4 could then be conducted for each activated IN identifier individually. Also, although step S3 only indicates comparing one stored condition parameter with a current condition parameter, it is naturally possible to compare the current parameter with a plurality of stored parameters, e.g. to determine if the current condition parameter lies in a specific range. Moreover, it is possible to compare a plurality of condition parameters that belong to a given condition. For example, in the event of the location being the condition, it is possible to make a decision based on the network identifier and the cell identifier, or in the case that the time is the condition, it is possible to make a decision based on the time of day and the date. Furthermore, it is clear that the predetermined condition checked in step S4 depends on the specific one or more conditions and one or more condition parameters, such that a wide variety of requirements can be implemented, depending on the specific desired effect. Regarding the above-described basic routine and its various modifications, it is clear that the call handler 1 must store the appropriate current condition parameter (s) . In mobile communication systems, it is already known to store certain current condition parameters in association with subscriber information, e.g. the location and status. The updating procedures for such parameters are well known and therefore need not be described further here. If the comparison step S3 requires new forms of condition parameters (e.g. the local time of the mobile station) to be stored, then analogous updating routines can be implemented for keeping the data in the call handler (e.g. in the HLR in the case of GSM) up to date . As already mentioned above, the above-described routine of Fig. 1 or one of its many variations is implemented in the call handler 1. It is preferably implemented such that unnecessary signaling and call handling is avoided to the maximum, which means that the routine should be implemented in the register or memory where the subscriber information (information used for determining routing information on the basis of call destination information) is contained, i.e. in the second part 11, which means in the HLR 11 in the case of the GSM system shown in Fig. 3. Naturally, it is also possible to implement the routine or one of its modifications in the first part 10 (the GMSC 10 in the case of GSM) , but this can lead to unnecessary signaling between the first part 10 and the second part 11. Although the present invention has been described by way of specific embodiments, it is not intended to restrict the invention to these embodiments, as the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims. Also, reference numerals in the claims serve to make the claims easier to read, but do not restrict the scope.

Claims: Claims 1. A call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) that is connectable to a mobile communication network (3) through which calls are routed to and from mobile stations, where said calls contain call destination information, said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) being arranged to receive calls that are to be routed and being operable to determine routing information for said received calls by interrogating information stored in said call handler (GSMC, HLR; 1) that relates to call destination information contained in a call being routed, to apply said routing information to a corresponding call and to pass said calls into said mobile communication network together with said routing information, and said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) being arranged to store a current value of at least one mobile station condition parameter, said call handler (GMSC, HLR;1) furthermore being connectable to an intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 2) and being operable to perform a decision routine that makes a decision if an intelligent network service is to be invoked, said decision routine being executable to check (SI) if one or more intelligent network identifiers are activated in the stored information that relates to a call destination, and if it is decided that an intelligent network service is to be invoked for a call, said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) being operable to send at least signaling information associated with said one or more intelligent network identifiers to said intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 3) , characterized in that said decision routine is furthermore executable such that if a call being handled is a call to be routed to a mobile station, and if it is determined that at least one intelligent network identifier is activated in said stored information, a further determination (S3, S4) is executable, where said further determination comprises comparing (S3) a stored comparison value of a mobile station condition parameter associated with a corresponding condition of- the mobile station to which said call being handled is to be routed, with a current value of said mobile station condition parameter of said mobile station, and where said decision regarding the invocation of an intelligent network service depends (S4) on the outcome of said comparison. 2. The call handler of claim 1, characterized in that said condition is an operating condition or a circumstantial condition. 3. The call handler of claim 2, characterized in that said operating condition is the status of said mobile station. 4. The call handler of claim 3, characterized in that the mobile station condition parameter associated with the status is an on/off indicator and/or a busy indicator and/or an operating mode indicator. 5. The call handler of claim 2, characterized in that said circumstantial condition is the location of said mobile station. 6. The call handler of claim 5, characterized in that the mobile station condition parameter associated with the location is a country indicator and/or a network indicator and/or a cell indicator. 7. The call handler of claim 2, characterized in that said circumstantial condition is a time associated with said mobile station. 8. The call handler of claim 7, characterized in that the mobile station condition parameter associated with the time is a date indicator and/or a clock indicator. 9. The call handler of one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that said further determination is executed under the condition (S2) that a validity indicator associated with said activated intelligent network identifier is set. 10. The call handler of one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that said call handler (1) has a first part (10; GMSC) connected to said mobile communication network, and a second part (11; HLR) in which said routing information is stored and in which said decision routine is performed. 11. The call handler of claim 10, characterized in that said mobile communication network (3) is a GSM network or a UMTS network, and said first part (10) is a gateway mobile switching center and said second part (11) is a home location register. 12. The call handler of one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that said intelligent network service is provided in accordance with Customised Applications for Mobile network Enhanced Logic (CAMEL) . 13. A call handling system, comprising a call handler (1) according to one of claims 1 to 12, and an intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 3) , where said intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 3) comprises a first part (20; gsmSSF) that is connected to said call handler (1) and receives said at least signaling information when it is decided that an intelligent network service is to be invoked for a call, and a second part (21; gsmSCF) that is interrogated by said first part (20; gsmSSF) in response to having received said at least signaling information, where said second part (21; gsmSCF) provides said first part (20; gsmSSF) with control information in response to being interrogated. 14. The call handling system of claim 13, characterized in that said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) and said intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 2) belong to said mobile communication network. 15. The call handling system of claim 13 or 14, characterized in that said mobile communication network operates in accordance with GSM or UMTS, and said first part (gsmSSF) of said intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF) is a GSM service switching function, and said second part (gsmSCF) of said intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF) is a GSM service control function. 16. Method of controlling the invocation of an intelligent network service in a call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) that is connectable to a mobile communication network (3) through which calls are routed to and from mobile stations, where said calls contain call destination information, said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) being arranged to receive calls that are to be routed and being operable to determine routing information for said received calls by interrogating information stored in said call handler (GSMC, HLR; 1) that relates to call destination information contained in a call being routed, to apply said routing information to a corresponding call and to pass said calls into said mobile communication network together with said routing information, said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) being arranged to store a current value of at least one mobile station condition parameter, said call handler (GMSC, HLR; 1) furthermore being connectable to an intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 3) , said control method comprising a decision routine that makes a decision if an intelligent network service is to be invoked, comprising: checking (SI) if one or more intelligent network identifiers are activated in the stored information that relates to a call destination, deciding if an intelligent network service is to be invoked on the basis of the result of said checking step ' (SI) , and if it is decided that an intelligent network service is to be invoked for a call, sending at least signaling information associated with said one or more intelligent network identifiers to said intelligent network service handler (gsmSSF, gsmSCF; 2), characterized in that if a call being handled is a call to be routed to a mobile station, and if it is determined that at least one intelligent network identifier is activated in said stored information, said decision routine (S3, S4) is executable to perform a further determination, where said further determination comprises comparing (S3) a stored comparison value of a mobile station condition parameter associated with a corresponding condition of the mobile station to which said call being handled is to be routed, with a current value of said mobile station condition parameter of said mobile station, and where said decision regarding the invocation of an intelligent network service depends on the outcome (S4) of said comparison. 17. The method of claim 16, characterized in that said condition is an operating condition or a circumstantial condition. 18. The method of claim 17, characterized in that said operating condition is the status of said mobile station. 19. The method of claim 18, characterized in that the mobile station condition parameter associated with the status is an on/off indicator and/or a busy indicator and/or an operating mode indicator. 20. The method of claim 17, characterized in that said circumstantial condition is the location of said mobile station. 21. The method of claim 20, characterized in that the mobile station condition parameter associated with the location is a country indicator and/or a network indicator and/or a cell indicator. 22. The method of claim 17, characterized in that said circumstantial condition is a time associated with said mobile station. 23. The method of claim 22, characterized in that the mobile station condition parameter associated with the time is a date indicator and/or a clock indicator. 24. The method of one of claims 16 to 23, characterized in that said further determination is executed under the condition that a validity indicator associated with said activated intelligent network identifier is set. 25. The method of one of claims 16 to 24, characterized in that said call handler has a first part (10; GMSC) connected to said mobile communication network, and a second part (11; HLR) in which said routing information is stored and in which said decision routine is performed. 26. The method of claim 25 ,, characterized in that said mobile communication network is a GSM network or a UMTS network, and said first part is a gateway mobile switching center and said second part is a home location register. 27. The method of one of claims 16 to 26, characterized in that said intelligent network service is provided in accordance with Customised Applications for Mobile network Enhanced Logic (CAMEL) . 28. A computer program product, stored on a computer readable medium, which is arranged to perform the method of one claims 16 to 27 when read into the memory of a computer.

Inventors: MAEKINIEMI PETRI, VAINIOMAEKI HANNU, MAEKINIEMI, PETRI, VAINIOMAEKI, HANNU
Applicants: ERICSSON TELEFON AB L M, MAEKINIEMI PETRI, VAINIOMAEKI HANNU, MAEKINIEMI, PETRI, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL), VAINIOMAEKI, HANNU
Application year: 2001
Main classification: H04Q3
IPC codes: H04Q3