PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PROTEIN-BASED HYDROGELS

Abstract: The present invention provides a novel process for preparing bioartificial hydrogels. This process comprises mixing a bifunctionalized polymer and a protein derived from a vegeral source or milk in an aqueous solution under basic conditions to form a three-dimensional reticulated mixture or gel. Specifically, the novel hydrogels are based on the cross-linking of a protein derived from milk or from a vegetal source (such as casein, hydrolyzed soy protein or hydrolyzed wheat protein) with a biofunctionalized polymer, such as polyethylene glycol or oxide. Preferably, the bifunctionalized polymer is polyethylene glycol. The invention further comprises the hydrogels produced by the novel process and a plurality of biomedical applications based on these hydrogels. These novel hydrogels possess advantageous characteristics, such as shape retention, shape memory, high water content (greater than 95 % (w/w) based on the dry weight of the hydrogel), and good mechanical and optical properties. The hydrogels exhibit additional characteristics -- biocompatibility, controlled release of medications or drugs, hydrophilic surface, oxygen permeability, and controlled porosity -- that should make them highly suitable for pharmaceutical, medical and cosmeceutical applications.

Description: PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PROTEINBASED HYDROGELS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a process for the preparation of protein- based hydrogels. More specifically, the present invention is concerned with a process for the preparation in aqueous solution of bioartificial hydrogels having a high water content by cross-linking a protein from a vegetal source (such as hydrolyzed soy protein or hydrolyzed wheat protein), from milk (such as casein) or from a marine source (such as fish protein or algae) with bifunctionalyzed polyethylene glycols. The invention further covers the hydrogels produced by this process and their use in a variety of pharmaceutical, medical and cosmeceutical applications. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Hydrogels are matrices made from polymers of synthetic or natural origin that contain a large quantity of water (usually greater than 50% of their weight). They have the ability to swell and normally do not dissolve in water (1 ). In general terms, hydrogels are prepared by mixing hydrophilic polymers under conditions that enable physical interactions between the polymers, or the three-dimensional reticulation of these polymers to a degree sufficient to form a gel. Bioartificial or semi-synthetic hydrogels may also be prepared by the covalent addition of bifunctional agents to the proteins so that the proteins are cross-linked to form a three-dimensional matrix. A wide variety of monomers or polymers have been used in the formation of biomatrixes. The most common are 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, referred to as HEMA, poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(ethylene oxide), referred to as PEG and PEO, respectively (2). HEMA, PEG and PEO polymers are advantageous in the preparation of biomatrixes since they are stable under the pH, temperature and salinity conditions commonly encountered in biological media (3). E. M. D'urso and G. Fortier prepared and characterized hydrogels formed by the combination of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with PEG in alkaline solution (3, 4). In these hydrogels, the protein molecules served as anchor points and were cross-linked between themselves by the use of bifunctionalized PEG. The degree of reticulation was partly dependent on the number of accessible lysyl amino groups available at the proteins' surfaces (6). The resultant hydrogels were translucid and glassy, and demonstrated mechanical properties in wet conditions very similar to a polyacrylamide gel (4). They also exhibited good BSA retention (0.4-0.5 mg of BSA/mg of PEG), an elevated water content (about 97%) and a good hydrophilicity, making them highly suitable for biomedical applications, particularly in the light of the low immunogenicity associated with proteins modified with PEG (3, 5). Moreover, the high porosity of the hydrogels allowed protein diffusion, suggesting that the hydrogels could be used as controlled delivery systems for macromolecules (3). U.S. Patent No. 5,514,379 (Weissleder et al) teaches the synthesis of biocompatible, biodegradable hydrogels using proteins or polysaccharides with cross-linking agents such as polyvalent derivatives of polyethylene or polyalkylene glycol. More specifically, the cross-linking agents are chosen from among the following group: bis-hydroxysuccinimide ester of polyalkylene glycol ("PAG") diacid, bis-hydroxysulfosuccinimide ester of PAG diacid, bis-imidate of PAG diacid, bis-imidazolide of PAG diacid, bis- imidazolide of PAG, bis-halide of PAG, bis-chloranhydride of PAG diacid, bis (n-amino alkyl) of PAG, and bis (polyoxyalkylene-bis, or bis benzoxazolide of PAG). Reaction between the cross-linking agent and a protein, such as BSA, occurs in DMSO solution. The resultant hydrogels are said to be suitable for loading with diagnostic labels (such as chemotherapeutic drugs, antibiotics, or cells that produce therapeutic agents). Another suggested application is the use of these hydrogels for imaging during interventional procedures of a patient. U.S. Patent 5,733,563 (Fortier) teaches the preparation in basic solution of bioartificial hydrogels consisting of a three-dimensional cross-linked mixture of a bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide with an albumin-type protein. The bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide is preferably polyethylene glycol and the albumin-type protein is chosen from various sources, such as BSA, lactalbumin and ovalbumin. The patent covers a process for preparing the hydrogels, the hydrogels and various applications for the hydrogels. The physical characteristics of hydrogels have led to their utilization in a number of ways, including as implant materials (7), contact lenses (8) and wound dressings (9), and as supports for the controlled-release of medications (10). A major disadvantage encountered with the processes currently available is their slow reaction time, making them inconvenient and/or unsuitable for the mass production of hydrogels. Such processes typically use buffer systems (such as phosphate or borate buffers) to have a controlled cross- linking reaction and to obtain reproducible results. The constant pH that is obtainable through the use of a buffer inhibits the variations that can be observed between different batches of raw materials. However, the use of a buffer also has an impact on the dynamics of the cross-linking reaction, resulting in long reaction times that are impractical for large-scale productions. There is thus a need for a faster and less expensive process for the preparation of hydrogels having a high-water content which are suitable for a number of pharmaceutical, medical and cosmeceutical applications. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It has now been found that the synthesis of hydrogels resulting from the cross-linking of a protein derived from a vegetal source (such as hydrolyzed soy protein or hydrolyzed wheat protein), from milk (such as casein) or from a marine source (such as fish protein or algae) with an activated polyalkylene oxide can be conveniently carried out using a strong base in aqueous solution without a buffer system. The reaction time is accelerated significantly and the gels produced have qualities analogous to those produced by the processes known in the art. Accordingly, the novel hydrogels possess many advantageous properties such as shape retention, shape memory, and high water content (greater than about 95% (w/w) based on the dry weight of the hydrogel). The novel hydrogels also possess good mechanical and optical properties. The hydrogels further possess a plurality of characteristics - biocompatibility, controlled release of medications or drugs, hydrophilic surface, oxygen permeability, and controlled porosity -- that should make them highly suitable for pharmaceutical, medical and cosmeceutical applications. Advantageously, the selection of a protein derived from vegetal sources or milk (such as hydrolyzed soy protein, hydrolyzed wheat protein or casein) to react with activated PEG allows the preparation of translucent hydrogels having a high-water content (> 95%) at minimal cost. These proteins are easily obtainable from different sources and therefore are significantly less expensive than animal-based proteins (such as BSA) which have previously been used to make bioartificial hydrogels. Additionally, proteins derived from vegetal sources or milk are free of the prions and viruses that may be present in blood-derived proteins, such as BSA. These features make these proteins highly expedient for the large- scale production of hydrogels. The present invention therefore provides a process for the preparation of hydrogels, the novel hydrogels produced thereby and a variety of pharmaceutical, medical and cosmeceutical applications based on these novel hydrogels. The novel hydrogels are polymerized hydrophilic gels essentially consisting of a reticulated mixture of: (a) a bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide activated with a suitable activating agent; and (b) a protein derived from a vegetal source (such as hydrolyzed soy protein or hydrolyzed wheat protein), from milk (such as casein) or from a marine source (such as fish protein or algae). The bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide may be represented by the following general formula: X— O— (CH 2 CH 2 O) n — X (I) wherein X represents a functionalized group capable of reacting with an NH 2 , an OH or a COOH group, and n may range from 45 to 800, which corresponds to PEG having a molecular weight ranging from 2 000 to 35 000. Preferably, the protein is hydrolyzed soy protein, hydrolyzed wheat protein or casein, and the polymer is polyethylene glycol (PEG) which has been suitably activated. A variety of pharmaceutical, medical and cosmeceutical applications for the novel hydrogels are also envisaged and methods for preparing the products related to those applications are claimed. Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent upon reading, with reference to the accompanying drawings, the following non-restrictive description of the preferred embodiments thereof. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the appended drawings: Figure 1 is a comparison of the reaction kinetics when PEG-soy hydrogels are polymerized in 0.15 N NaOH solution, 0.13 N NaOH solution, 0.12 N NaOH solution and 0.09 N NaOH solution; Figure 2 is a comparison of the reaction kinetics for PEG-soy hydrogels synthesized in 0.12 N NaOH solution, 0.09 N NaOH solution and 200 mM borate buffer solution pH 9.4; Figure 3 reveals the correspondence between the moment when the solutions begin to solidify and the end-time of polymerization for the synthesis of PEG-soy hydrogels; Figure 4 is a graphical comparison of the percentages PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein not incorporated in the resultant hydrogels when the reaction is initiated either in the presence of a strong base or in borate buffer solution; Figure 5 is a comparison of the reaction kinetics when PEG-casein hydrogels are polymerized in 0.20 N NaOH solution, 0.19 N NaOH solution and 0.15 N NaOH solution; Figure 6 is a comparison of the reaction kinetics when PEG-casein hydrogel is polymerized in 0.19 N NaOH solution, 0.15 N NaOH solution and 200 mM borate buffer solution pH 9.4; Figure 7 shows the linear correlation between the initial solidification time and the end-time of polymerization for PEG-casein hydrogels made in NaOH solution; Figure 8 is a graphical comparison of the percentages PEG and casein not incorporated in the resultant hydrogels when the reaction is initiated either in the presence of a strong base or in borate buffer solution; Figure 9 shows the effect of the ionic strength of the solution on the water content (C w ) of the hydrogels produced by the process of the invention; Figure 10 shows the effect of the ionic strength of a solution on the water uptake (C u ) of the hydrogels produced by the process of the invention; Figure 11 shows the effects of the ionic strengths of phosphate buffer solutions on the expansion volumes of the hydrogels produced by the process of the invention; Figure 12 shows the effects of the pH of the solution on the water content (C w ) of the hydrogels produced by the process of the invention; Figure 13 shows the effects of the pH of the solution on the water uptake (C u ) of the hydrogels produced by the process of the invention; Figure 14 shows the effect of the pH of phosphate and borate buffer solutions on the expansion volumes of the hydrogels produced by the process of the invention; and Figure 15 shows the relative uptake of 4-nitrophenol and Methylene Blue by the hydrogels as a function of time. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS I. PREPARATION OF PEG-SOY HYDROGEL PEG Activation In accordance with a preferred embodiment, PEG was first activated with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in order to obtain PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonate (or PEG-(NPC) 2 ), a reagent suitable for reaction with amino groups, in the manner described briefly below. PEG having a MW of 8kDa was made by Fluka and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd. (Oakville, Ontario, Canada). 4-Nitrophenyl chloroformate was from Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was used as received. All other chemical and biochemical reagents were of the purest grades available. PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonates were obtained using the method of Laliberte and Fortier (11 ). Specifically, prior to use, the PEG was dehydrated by dissolving 1.0 mmole of PEG in acetonitrile and refluxing at 80°C for 24 hours in a Soxhlet™ extractor containing 2.0 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The dehydrated solution containing 1.0 mmole of PEG was activated in the presence of at least 10.0 mmoles of 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in acetonitrile containing up to 5.0 mmoles of triethylamine. The reaction mixture was heated at 60°C for 24 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled and filtered, and the synthesized PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonate was precipitated by adding diethyl ether at room temperature and cooling the solution to 4°C. The percentage of activation was evaluated by following the release of 4-nitrophenol from the activated PEG in 0.1 M borate buffer solution, pH 8.5, at 25°C. The hydrolysis reaction was monitored at 400 nm until a constant absorbency was obtained. The purity was calculated based on the ratio of the amount of 4-nitrophenol released and detected spectrophotometrically against the amount of 4- nitrophenol expected to be released per weight of activated PEG used for the experiment. The purity of the final products was found to be around 100%. Commercial PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonates suitable for present purposes are available (Sharewater, Huntsville, Alabama, USA). Preparation of Hydrolyzed Soy Protein Soy protein was purchased from ADM Protein Specialties (Decatur, Illinois). Hydrolyzed soy protein for reaction with PEG was prepared in the following manner. A 10% (w/v) solution of soy was prepared by combining dry protein with distilled water and homogenizing in a blender. The temperature of the solution obtained was raised to 80°C and 2.15 moles of HCI were added per Kg soy protein. The resultant solution was vigorously agitated for 4 hours at 80°C and allowed to cool to room temperature. The pH of the solution was then increased to between 9 and 10 by adding NaOH while continuing to agitate strongly. The pH of the solution was subsequently lowered to about 4, and the precipitate obtained as a result of the lowering of the pH was collected by centrifugation at 2000 G for 10 minutes. The precipitate containing hydrolyzed soy protein was washed twice by removing the supernatant, mixing with an equivalent volume of distilled water, and centrifuging the solution obtained at 2000 G for 10 minutes. The final precipitate of hydrolyzed soy protein was dissolved in a volume of 1 to 5 mis distilled water per g of protein and the solution equilibrated to pH 7. The neutral solution was lyophilized to obtain a dry powder. Preparation of Hydrogel Using Activated PEG and Hydrolyzed Soy Protein To covalently cross-link the activated PEG with hydrolyzed soy protein, the hydrolyzed soy protein was dissolved to a concentration of about 3.5% to about 8% (w/v) in an aqueous solution containing a strong base (such as NaOH, KOH, LiOH, RbOH and CsOH) or an organic base (such as triethylamine). This solution was combined with an aqueous solution of bifunctionlized PEG having a concentration ranging from about 2% to about 30% (w/v). The resultant solution was vigorously mixed until homogenization occurred. Complete polymerization was observed in times ranging from about 5 minutes to about 120 minutes, depending on the volume of base added. Figure 3 reveals the correspondence between the moments when the solutions begin to solidify and the end-time of polymerization. As revealed in Figures 1 and 2, the speed with which polymerization or cross-linking occurs increases significantly when strong bases are used. It should be noted that the quantity of strong or organic base added to the PEG-soy solution to obtain a given polymerization time will vary depending on the sources of hydrolyzed soy protein and PEG used. Consequently, whenever hydrolyzed soy protein or PEG originating from a different batch or lot is used, it is preferable to conduct preliminary trial experiments to optimize experimental conditions before preparing large quantities of PEG- soy hydrogels. PREPARATION OF PEG-CASEIN HYDROGEL PEG Activation PEG was activated with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in order to obtain PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonate, as described above in relation to the PEG- soy hydrogel. (Alternatively, commercially available PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonate could have been used to prepare the hydrogels.) Preparation of Hydrogel Using Activated PEG and Casein Casein was purchased from the American Casein Company of Burlington, New Jersey. To covalently cross-link the activated PEG with casein, the casein was dissolved to a concentration of about 3% to about 9% (w/v) in an aqueous solution containing a strong base (such as NaOH, KOH, LiOH, RbOH and CsOH) or an organic base (such as triethylamine). This solution was combined with an aqueous solution of bifunctionlized PEG having a concentration ranging from about 3% to about 30% (w/v). The resultant solution was vigorously mixed until homogenization occurred. Complete polymerization was observed in times ranging from about 5 minutes to about 120 minutes, depending on the volume of base added. Figure 7 reveals the correspondence between the moment when the solutions begin to solidify and the end-time of polymerization. As revealed in Figures 5 and 6, the speed with which polymerization or cross-linking occurs increases significantly when strong bases are used. It should be noted that the quantity of strong or organic base added to the PEG-casein solution to obtain a given polymerization time will vary depending on the source of casein and PEG used. Consequently, whenever casein or PEG originating from a different batch or lot is used, it is preferable to conduct preliminary trial experiments to optimize experimental conditions before preparing large quantities of PEG-casein hydrogels. Casein from a number of milks should be suitable for the preparation of hydrogels in accordance with the present method, as would other milk- derived proteins. Indeed, in a test experiment, it was found that complete milk protein does react with bifunctionalized PEG to form an hydrogel, although the resultant gel had weak mechanical properties. Similarly, proteins from a marine source, such as fish protein and algae, would be expected to form hydrogels with similar properties. III. PREPARATION OF PEG-WHEAT HYDROGEL PEG Activation PEG was activated with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in order to obtain PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonate, as described above in relation to the PEG- Soy hydrogel. (Alternatively, commercially available PEG-dinitrophenyl carbonate could have been used to prepare the hydrogels.) Preparation of Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein Wheat protein was purchased from ADM Protein Specialties (Decatur, Illinois). Hydrolyzed wheat protein for reaction with PEG was prepared in the same manner as the hydrolyzed soy protein (described above). Preparation of Hydrogel Using Activated PEG and Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein To covalently cross-link the activated PEG with hydrolyzed wheat protein, the protein was dissolved to a concentration of about 8% to about 12% (w/v) in an aqueous solution containing a strong base (such as NaOH, KOH, LiOH, RbOH and CsOH) or an organic base (such as triethylamine). This solution was combined with an aqueous solution of bifunctionlized PEG having a concentration ranging from about 13% to about 15% (w/v). The resultant solution was vigorously mixed until homogenization occurred. Complete polymerization was observed in times ranging from about 5 minutes to about 120 minutes, depending on the volume of base added. It should be noted that the quantity of strong or organic base added to the PEG-wheat solution to obtain a given polymerization time will vary depending on the sources of hydrolyzed wheat protein and PEG used. Consequently, whenever wheat protein or PEG originating from a different batch or lot is used, it is preferable to conduct preliminary trial experiments to optimize experimental conditions before preparing large quantities of PEG-wheat hydrogels. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, other vegetal proteins may be substituted for soy or wheat protein in the preparation of hydrogels as described herein without departing from the essence and spirit of the invention. By experimenting with various types of protein, it has been determined that the quantity of carbohydrate attached to the protein may have a direct effect on the suitability of a given source. For example, experiments conducted with pea protein (which has a high carbohydrate content) resulted in hydrogels having weaker mechanical properties. EVALUATION OF DEGREE OF WATER CONTENT AND WATER UPTAKE Under specified solution conditions, the water content (C w ) and water uptake (C u ) of a synthesized hydrogel can be evaluated by comparing the weight of the dry hydrogel (W 0 ) to the weight of the hydrogel in the swollen state (W sw ). The water content and water uptake were calculated using the following equations which were extracted from the work of Richard J. LaPorte (14): (1 ) C w = [(W sw - Wo)/W sw x 100 (2) C u = [(W SW - W 0 )IW 0 ] x λOO EXAMPLES The synthesis of PEG-soy, PEG-casein or PEG-wheat hydrogels using NaOH as a catalyst is characterized by two factors: the solidification time, which corresponds to the time at which the polymerization solution is too viscous to be moulded or formed into a desired shape, and the end-time (or termination time) of polymerisation, which corresponds to the time at which the hydrogel can be washed with minimal loss of PEG and protein. To evaluate the solidification times relating to a certain amount of NaOH, a simple screening test is used on the different formulations of hydrogels. EXAMPLE 1 : Preparation and Qualitative Characterization of PEG-Sov Hydrogel Formulations For hydrogels made of 8 kDa PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6%, respectively), two solutions were prepared: 20 mis of 18 % 8 kDa PEG-(NPC) 2 in water and 20 mis of 13.3 % hydrolyzed soy protein in water. The hydrolyzed soy protein solution was divided into 30 samples of 450 μl, and the samples were adjusted to give a final protein concentration of 12 % by adding 50 μl of an appropriate volume of NaOH to obtain a NaOH normality ranging from 0.01 N to 0.3 N in the different samples. The PEG-(NPC) 2 solution was also separated into 30 samples of 500 μl. To the different samples of PEG-(NPC) 2 , 500 μl of hydrolyzed soy protein at different NaOH normalities were added and mixed. The solution of two polymers was allowed to rest and the solidification time for a specific NaOH normality was noted. When the solidification was greater than 10 minutes, the solution was no longer observed because hydrogels usually do not solidify beyond that time, or have poor mechanical properties if they do. Two hours following the mixing of the two polymers, the mechanical properties of the hydrogel were qualitatively evaluated using the following scale: very firm, firm, mildly firm, weakly firm and soft. Table 1 : Data Relating to the Synthesis and Characterization of Different PEG-Soy Hydrogel Formulations EXAMPLE 2: Preparation and Qualitative Characterization of PEG- Casein Hydrogel Formulations For hydrogels made of 8 kDa PEG and casein (9% and 7%, respectively), two solutions were prepared: 20 mis of 18 % 8 kDa PEG-(NPC) 2 in water and 20 mis of 15.6 % casein in water. The casein solution was divided into 30 samples of 450 μl, and the samples were adjusted to give a final protein concentration of 14 % by adding 50 μl of an appropriate volume of NaOH to obtain a NaOH normality ranging from 0.01 N to 0.3 N in the different samples. The PEG-(NPC) 2 solution was also separated into 30 samples of 500 μl. To the different samples of PEG-(NPC) 2 , 500 μl of casein at different NaOH normalities were added and mixed. The solution of two polymers was allowed to rest and the solidification time for a specific NaOH normality was noted. When the solidification was greater than 10 minutes, the solution was no longer observed because hydrogels usually do not solidify beyond that time, or have poor mechanical properties if they do. Two hours following the mixing of the two polymers, the mechanical properties of the hydrogel were qualitatively evaluated using the following scale: very firm, firm, mildly firm, weakly firm and soft. Table 2: Data Relating to the Synthesis and Characterization of Different PEG-Casein Hydrogel Formulations EXAMPLE 3: Preparation and Qualitative Characterization of PEG- Wheat Hydrogel Formulations For hydrogels made of 8 kDa PEG and hydrolyzed wheat protein (14% and 9%, respectively), two solutions were prepared: 20 mis of 28 % 8 kDa PEG-(NPC) 2 in water and 20 mis of 20 % hydrolyzed wheat protein in water. The hydrolyzed wheat protein solution was divided into 30 samples of 450 μl, and the samples were adjusted to give a final protein concentration of 18 % by adding 50 μl of an appropriate volume of NaOH to obtain a NaOH normality ranging from 0.01 N to 0.3 N in the different samples. The PEG-(NPC) 2 solution was also separated into 30 samples of 500 μl. To the different samples of PEG-(NPC) 2 , 500 μl of hydrolyzed wheat protein at different NaOH normalities were added and mixed. The solution of two polymers was allowed to rest and the solidification time for a specific NaOH normality was noted. When the solidification was greater than 10 minutes, the solution was no longer observed because hydrogels usually do not solidify beyond that time, or have poor mechanical properties if they do. Two hours following the mixing of the two polymers, the mechanical properties of the hydrogel were qualitatively evaluated using the following scale: very firm, firm, mildly firm, weakly firm and soft. Table 3: Data Relating to the Synthesis and Characterization of Different PEG-Wheat Hydrogel Formulations EXAMPLE 4: Measurement of Kinetics and End-times of Polymerization for PEG-Soy Hydrogels The kinetics and the end-times of polymerization were evaluated through the time-controlled termination of polymerization using a washing step. The end-time of polymerization is defined as the point when the losses in PEG and protein in the washing process reach a minimum. The losses in PEG and protein at the end-time of polymerization also serve to evaluate the quality of the polymerization, as it has been observed that the strength of the mechanical properties of the hydrogels is inversely related to the losses of PEG and protein during the washing steps. For example, for hydrogels made using a certain batch of 8 kDa PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6% respectively), it was determined that to obtain solidification times of 60 seconds, 40 seconds, 30 seconds and 20 seconds, the polymerization reactions had to occur in 0.09 N, 0.12 N, 0.13 N and 0.15 N NaOH solutions, respectively. The quality and end- times of polymerization of hydrogels synthesized using NaOH were also compared to the hydrogels synthesized in buffer solution by controlled termination of polymerization. In this case, the buffer used to make PEG- soy hydrogels was a 200 mM borate buffer (pH 9.4). A 100 ml solution of 18 % 8 kDa PEG-(NPC) 2 in water was prepared with 20 mis of a 12 % hydrolyzed soy protein solution in 0.09 N NaOH, 20 mis of a 12 % hydrolyzed soy protein solution in 0.12 N NaOH, 20 mis of a 12 % hydrolyzed soy protein solution in 0.13 N NaOH, 20 mis of a 12 % hydrolyzed soy protein solution in 0.15 N NaOH and 20 mis of a 12 % hydrolyzed soy protein solution in 200 mM borate buffer (pH 9.4). The controlled termination of the polymerization was done in triplicate by transferring 1 ml of PEG solution to three 50-ml tubes. One ml of the desired hydrolyzed soy protein solution (0.09N, 0.12N, 0.13N, 0.15N or 200 mM borate buffer pH 9.4) was added to each tube. Rapidly, the two solutions were mixed and the tube was laid down to allow the hydrogel to form a thin film. The polymerization was stopped at a precise time by pulling the hydrogel from the surface of the tube and by adding 48 ml of 10 mM borate buffer solution (pH 8.5). The controlled termination of the polymerization was done at intervals of 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes and 5 minutes for the polymerizations done in 0.15N NaOH solution. It was done at intervals of 2 minutes, 4 minutes, 8 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes for the polymerizations done in 0.13N and 0.12N NaOH solutions, and at intervals of 8 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 120 minutes for the polymerizations in 0.09N NaOH solution. For hydrogels synthesized in 200 mM borate buffer (pH 9.4), it was done at longer intervals corresponding to 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, 480 minutes and 960 minutes. The protein and PEG that did not polymerize were recovered in the washing solutions. To ensure that a maximum of protein and of PEG had diffused into the washing solution, the hydrogel was kept under agitation for at least 1 hour during the washing process. To recover all of the unincorporated protein and PEG, three washes were needed. Samples from each wash were withdrawn to determine the quantities of protein and PEG released. The proteins were measured using the bicinchonic acid assay (BCA) (12). A micro-method kit was prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's directions (Pierce). Two parts of MC reactant (4% cupric sulphate) were mixed with 48 parts of MB reactant (4% BCA in water) and 50 parts of MA reactant (sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and sodium tartrate in 0.2 N NaOH). 100 μl of this solution were added to 100 μl of either the protein samples to be analyzed or the control sample. A measurement of the absorbency at 562 nm was made following a 3-hour incubation at 37°C. The PEG was measured by the formation of a PEG/potassium iodine complex (13). 50 μl of barium chloride (5% BaCI 2 in 1 N HCI) were added to 200 μl of either the PEG sample to be analyzed or the control. 25 μl of iodine (2% Kl in 0.05N l 2 ) were added to start the reaction. The solution was mixed in the microplates and incubated for 15 minutes in total darkness. After incubation, a measure of the absorbency was made at 532 nm. To determine the kinetics of the polymerization reaction for the 0.15 N, 0.13 N, 0.12 N and 0.09 N NaOH solutions, the quantity of PEG released during the three washes was subtracted from the amount of PEG present in the initial 2 ml polymerization solution. This was done in order to determine the quantity of PEG present in the final gel, which in turn allowed the determination of the extent (or percentage) of polymerization. One hundred percent polymerization corresponds to the point where the loss of PEG is at its lowest possible value. Figure 1 shows that complete polymerization was attained at intervals of 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes for the 0.15 N, 0.13 N, 0.12 N and 0.09 N NaOH solutions, respectively. Figure 2 is a comparison of the reaction kinetics when hydrogels were polymerized in 0.12 N NaOH solution, 0.09 N NaOH solution and 200 mM borate buffer solution (pH 9.4). It may be observed that the reaction is significantly longer in borate buffer solution as complete polymerization occurs at 960 minutes in buffer solution compared with 60 minutes for the slowest complete polymerization reaction using NaOH (0.09 N NaOH). This represents a reaction time that is 16 times greater. When compared with reaction using 0.15 N NaOH, reaction in buffer solution is 192 times slower (not shown). Figure 3 shows the approximately linear correlation between the initial solidification time and the end-time of polymerization for PEG-soy hydrogels made using NaOH. Figure 4 is a bar diagram showing total losses of PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein for hydrogels made in borate buffer and for hydrogels made using NaOH. It may be seen that the losses in PEG are significantly greater when the hydrogels are prepared in borate buffer. A possible explanation for this observation is that the three-dimensional network is not as strong in hydrogels prepared in borate buffer, and this results in hydrogels with weaker mechanical properties (i.e., the degrees of plasticity and elasticity are lower in hydrogels where there is less cross-linking). Figure 4 also shows that the losses in hydrolyzed soy protein do not differ significantly whether the hydrogels are prepared in buffer solution or prepared using NaOH as a catalyst. This may be explained by the fact that the proteins act as anchor points for the bifunctionalized PEG and they can be effectively trapped in the hydrogel even when the reticulation is weak. EXAMPLE 5: Measure of Kinetics and End-times of Polymerization for PEG-Casein Hydrogels The kinetics and the end-times of polymerization were evaluated through the time-controlled termination of polymerization using a washing step. The end-time of polymerization is defined as the point when the losses in PEG and protein in the washing process reach a minimum. The losses in PEG and protein at the end-time of polymerization also serve to evaluate the quality of the polymerization, as it has been observed that the strength of the mechanical properties of the hydrogels is inversely related to the losses of PEG and protein during the washing steps. For example, for hydrogels made using a certain batch of 8 kDa PEG and casein (9% and 7% respectively), it was determined that to obtain solidification times of 90 seconds, 30 seconds and 15 seconds, the polymerization reactions had to occur in 0.15 N, 0.19 N and 0.20 N NaOH solutions, respectively. The quality and end-times of polymerization of hydrogels synthesized using NaOH were also compared to the hydrogels synthesized in buffer solution by controlled termination of polymerization. In this case, the buffer used to make PEG-Casein hydrogels was a 200 mM borate buffer (pH 9.4). A 100 ml solution of 18 % 8 kDa PEG-(NPC) 2 in water was prepared with 20 mis of a 14 % casein solution in 0.15 N NaOH, 20 mis of a 14 % casein solution in 0.19 N NaOH, 20 mis of a 14 % casein solution in 0.20 N NaOH and 20 mis of a 14 % casein solution in 200 mM borate buffer (pH 9.4). The controlled termination of the polymerization was done in triplicate by transferring 1 ml of PEG solution to three 50-ml tubes. One ml of the desired casein solution (0.15N, 0.19N, 0.20N or 200 mM borate buffer pH 9.4) was added to each tube. Rapidly, the two solutions were mixed and the tube was laid down to allow the hydrogel to form a thin film. The polymerization was stopped at a precise time by pulling the hydrogel from the surface of the tube and by adding 48 ml of 10 mM borate buffer solution (pH 8.5). The controlled termination of the polymerization was done at intervals of 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes and 5 minutes for the polymerizations done in 0.20N NaOH solution. It was done at intervals of 2 minutes, 4 minutes, 8 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes for the polymerizations done in 0.19N and at intervals of 8 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 120 minutes for the polymerizations in 0.15N NaOH solution. For hydrogels synthesized in 200 mM borate buffer (pH 9.4), it was done at longer intervals corresponding to 120 minutes, 240 minutes, 480 minutes and 960 minutes. The protein and PEG which did not polymerize were recovered in the washing solutions. To ensure that a maximum of protein and of PEG had diffused into the washing solution, the hydrogel was kept under agitation for at least 1 hour during the washing process. To recover all of the unincorporated protein and PEG, three washes were needed. Samples from each wash were withdrawn to determine the quantities of protein and PEG released. The proteins were measured using the bicinchonic acid assay (BCA) (12). A micro-method kit was prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's directions (Pierce). Two parts of MC reactant (4% cupric sulphate) were mixed with 48 parts of MB reactant (4% BCA in water) and 50 parts of MA reactant (sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and sodium tartrate in 0.2 N NaOH). 100 μl of this solution were added to 100 μl of either the protein samples to be analyzed or the control sample. A measurement of the absorbency at 562 nm was made following a 3-hour incubation at 37°C. The PEG was measured by the formation of a PEG/potassium iodine complex (13). 50 μl of barium chloride (5% BaCI 2 in 1 N HCI) were added to 200 μl of either the PEG sample to be analyzed or the control. 25 μl of iodine (2% Kl in 0.05N l 2 ) were added to start the reaction. The solution was mixed in the microplates and incubated for 15 minutes in total darkness. After incubation, a measurement of the absorbency was made at 532 nm. To determine the kinetics of the polymerization reaction for the 0.20 N, 0.19 N and 0.15 N NaOH solutions, the quantity of PEG released during the three washes was subtracted from the amount of PEG present in the initial 2 ml polymerization solution. This was done in order to determine the quantity of PEG present in the final gel, which in turn allowed the determination of the extent (or percentage) of polymerization. One hundred percent polymerization corresponds to the point where the loss of PEG is at its lowest possible value. Figure 5 shows that complete polymerization was attained at intervals of 5 minutes, 30 minutes and 120 minutes for the 0.20N, 0.19 N and 0.15N NaOH solutions, respectively. Figure 6 is a comparison of the reaction kinetics when the hydrogels are polymerized in 0.19 N NaOH solution, 0.15 N NaOH solution and 200 mM borate buffer solution (pH 9.4). It may be observed that the reaction is significantly longer in borate buffer solution as complete polymerization occurs at 960 minutes in buffer solution compared with 120 minutes for the slowest complete polymerization reaction using NaOH (0.15 N NaOH). This represents a reaction time that is 8 times greater. When compared with reaction using 0.20 N NaOH, reaction in buffer solution is 192 times slower (not shown). Figure 7 shows the linear correlation between the initial solidification time and the end-time of polymerization for PEG-casein hydrogels made using NaOH. Figure 8 is a bar diagram showing total losses of PEG and casein for hydrogels made in borate buffer and for hydrogels made using NaOH. It may be seen that the losses in PEG are significantly greater when the hydrogels are prepared in borate buffer. A possible explanation for this observation is that the three-dimensional network is not as strong in hydrogels prepared in borate buffer, and this results in hydrogels with weaker mechanical properties (i.e., the degrees of plasticity and elasticity are lower in hydrogels where there is less cross-linking). Figure 8 also shows that the losses in casein are significantly higher when the hydrogels are prepared in buffer solution compared to those prepared using 0.20 N NaOH solution. EXAMPLE 6: The Effect of Ionic Strength on the Water Content (C and Water Uptake (C„) of PEG-Soy Hydrogels Measurements of the water content (C w ) and water uptake (C u ) were made using solutions having different ionic strengths. Hydrogels made with 8 kDa bifunctionalized PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6 %, respectively) were poured between two plates of glass separated by 1-mm spacers. Hydrogels having a volume of 1.25 mis were subsequently allowed to swell and equilibrate in a solution of 10 mM NaCI to the point where no 4-nitrophenol was detectable by absorbency readings at 400 nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The hydrogels were allowed to equilibrate in different concentrations of phosphate buffer at pH 6 by washing five times for one hour each time in 40 mis of buffer. The different concentrations of phosphate buffer used were the following: 100 mM, 75 mM, 50 mM, 25 mM, 12.5 mM, 10 mM, 5 mM, 1 mM, 0.1 mM and O mM. For each concentration of buffer, the hydrogels were removed from solution, the water on their surfaces was blotted and the hydrogels, then in their swollen state (W sw ), were weighed. The hydrogels were later dried to a constant weight in an oven at 80°C and this dry weight (W 0 ) was measured. The results were then used to calculate the water content (C w ) and water uptake (C u ) in accordance with equations (1 ) and (2), above. The effect of the ionic strength of the buffer solutions on the water content and water uptake of the hydrogels is shown graphically in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. It may be observed that the water content (C w ) does not differ significantly from about 95% when the buffer concentration ranges between 10 mM and 100 mM. This is even more apparent when the same results are reported in terms of water uptake (C u ). It may be seen from Figure 10 that the water uptake is fairly constant with a value of around 20 times the dry weight of the hydrogel when the buffer concentration ranges between 10 mM and 100 mM. There is, however, a dramatic increase in swelling when buffer concentrations lower than 10 mM are used, reaching a maximum when deionized water is used. In the absence of ionic strength, the swelling of the hydrogel can be such as to attain a water content (C w ) of about 99 %, corresponding to a water uptake (C u ) of about 70 times the dry weight of the hydrogel. EXAMPLE 7: The Effect of Ionic Strength on the Expansion Volumes of PEG-Soy Hydrogels Measurements of the expansion volumes were made using solutions having different ionic strengths. Hydrogels made with 8 kDa bifunctionalized PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6 %, respectively) were poured between two plates of glass separated by 1-mm spacers. The measurement of the expansion volume was performed in triplicate with a sufficient number of hydrogels having a volume of 1.25 mis. These hydrogels were initially weighed just after synthesis to measure their volumes in their unexpanded state. Subsequently the hydrogels were allowed to equilibrate in different concentrations of phosphate buffer at pH 6 by washing five times for one hour each time in 40 mis of buffer. The different concentrations of phosphate buffer used were the following: 100 mM, 75 mM, 50 mM, 25 mM, 12.5 mM, 10 mM, 5 mM, 1 mM, 0.1 mM and O mM. For each concentration of buffer, the hydrogels were removed from solution, the water on their surfaces was blotted and the hydrogels, then in their expanded state, were weighed. The measurement of the expansion volume was made by dividing the weight of the hydrogel in its expanded state by the weight of the hydrogel in its unexpanded state. The effect of the ionic strengths of the buffer solutions on the expansion volumes of the hydrogels is shown graphically in Figure 11. It can be observed that the expansion volume does not differ significantly from 1.8 times the volume of the unexpanded hydrogel when the buffer concentration ranges between 10 mM and 100 mM. There is, however, a dramatic increase in expansion volume when buffer concentrations lower than 10 mM are used, reaching a maximum when deionized water is used. In the absence of ionic strength, the expansion volume of the hydrogel can be such as to attain 5.5 times the volume of the unexpanded hydrogel. EXAMPLE 8: The Effect of pH on the Water Content (C and Water Uptake (C„) of PEG-Soy Hydrogels Measurements of the water content (C w ) and water uptake (C u ) were made using solutions having different pHs. Hydrogels made with 8 kDa bifunctionalized PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6%, respectively) were poured between two plates of glass separated by 1-mm spacers. Hydrogels having a volume of 1.25 mis were subsequently allowed to swell and equilibrate in a solution of 10 mM NaCI to the point where no 4-nitrophenol was detectable by absorbency readings at 400 nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The hydrogels were allowed to equilibrate in 10 mM phosphate buffer solution or 10 mM borate buffer solution having different pHs by washing five times for one hour each time in 40 mis of these buffers. Phosphate buffer solutions having pHs of 4, 6 and 7 were used. Borate buffer solutions having pHs of 9 and 11 were used. For each concentration of buffer, the hydrogels were removed from solution, the water on their surfaces was blotted and the hydrogels, then in their swollen state (W sw ), were weighed. The hydrogels were later dried to a constant weight in an oven at 80°C and this dry weight (W 0 ) was measured. The results were then used to calculate the water content (C w ) and water uptake (C u ) in accordance with equations (1 ) and (2), above. The effect of the pH of the buffer solutions on the water content and water uptake of the hydrogels is shown graphically in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. It can be observed that the water content (C w ) is directly proportional to the pH of the solution, ranging from about 94% to about 97.5% from pH 4 to 11. The same phenomenon can be observed when the water uptake (C u ) is considered. It may be seen from Figure 13 that the water uptake is directly proportional to the pH of the solution, ranging from about 17 times the dry weight to about 30 time the dry weight from pH 4 to 11. These variations in water content (C w ) and water uptake (C u ) can be explained by the low solubility of the hydrolyzed soy protein comprising the hydrogel at low pH and its increased solubility at high pH. EXAMPLE 9: The Effect of pH on the Expansion Volumes of PEG- Soy Hydrogels Measurements of the expansion volumes were made using solutions having different pHs. Hydrogels made with 8 kDa bifunctionalized PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6%, respectively) were poured between two plates of glass separated by 1-mm spacers. The measurement of the expansion volume was performed in triplicate with a sufficient number of hydrogels having a volume of 1.25 mis. These hydrogels were initially weighed just after synthesis to measure their volumes in their unexpanded state. Subsequently the hydrogels were allowed to equilibrate in 10 mM phosphate buffer solution or 10 mM borate buffer solution having different pHs by washing five times for one hour each time in 40 mis of these buffers. Phosphate buffer solutions having pHs of 4, 6 and 7 were used. Borate buffer solutions having pHs of 9 and 11 were used. For each concentration of buffer, the hydrogels were removed from solution, the water on their surfaces was blotted and the hydrogels, then in their expanded state, were weighed. The measurement of the expansion volume was made by dividing the weight of the hydrogel in its expanded state by the weight of the unexpanded hydrogel. The effect of the pH of the buffer solutions on the expansion volumes of the hydrogels is shown graphically in Figure 14. It can be observed that the expansion volume is directly proportional to the pH of the solution, ranging from about 1.2 times the unexpanded volume of the hydrogel to about 1.65 times the unexpanded volume of the hydrogel from pH 4 to 11. These variations in expansion volume can be explained by the low solubility of the hydrolyzed soy protein comprising the hydrogel at low pH and its increased solubility at high pH. EXAMPLE 10: Measurements of the Uptake of Two Different Models of Active Ingredients in PEG-Soy Hydrogels Measurements of the uptake times of actives ingredients in sample PEG- Soy hydrogels were made using 4-itrophenol and Methylene Blue as model molecules. Hydrogel films were made with 8 kDa bifunctionalized PEG and hydrolyzed soy protein (9% and 6%, respectively) by pouring the polymeric solution between two plates of glass separated by 1-mm spacers. Hydrogels were subsequently cut into small squares and allowed to swell and equilibrate in a 10 mM phosphate buffer solution pH 6 to the point where no 4-nitrophenol was detectable by absorbency readings at 400 nm. In their swollen state, the volume of those hydrogels was 745 μl ± 22 μl. The evaluation of the uptake time of 4-nitrophenol and Methylene Blue was made by first preparing a 1 ppm uptake solution of Methylene Blue and a 0.4 % solution of 4-nitrophenol. Three hydrogels were place in contact with a fresh 90-ml volume of one these uptake solutions for the following time intervals: 1>2 min, 3 min, 6 min, 15 min, 30 min and 60 min before their were removed from solution. After their removal, the hydrogels were carefully blotted of excess solution and were each transferred into 30 mis of 10 mM of phosphate buffer solution pH 6. The hydrogels were allowed to equilibrate in the solution by agitating for 24 hours to ensure that the equilibrium state was reached. The uptake of 4-nitrophenol and Methylene Blue was assumed to correspond to the amount of those model molecules released in the washing solution. The 4-nitrophenol in solution was measured through absorbency readings at 400 nm by comparing the results to a standard curve ranging from 80 to 1 μg/ml. Methylene Blue was measured through absorbency readings at 655 nm by comparing the results to a standard curve ranging from 3 to 0.0025 ppm. To evaluate the relative uptake of either of these model molecules, the total quantity of molecules in the 30-ml solution was taken to correspond to the initial volume of the hydrogel (745 μl). The concentration of the model molecules reported in the hydrogel was then compared (in percentage) to the initial concentration of the uptake solution. Figure 15 shows the relative uptake of 4-nitrophenol and Methylene Blue as a function of time. It may be seen that both molecules diffused very rapidly into the hydrogel and reached the same concentration as the uptake solution, in less than 1 1 2 minutes in the case of the Methylene Blue and in about 15 minute in the case of the 4-Nitrophenol. Methylene Blue even became concentrated in the hydrogel, to the point where it reached a concentration corresponding to more than 600 % that of the surrounding solution. This phenomenon may be caused by the latent charge of the hydrogel or the natural affinity of Methylene Blue for protein. As lots of other active ingredients or medicaments have affinities to protein similar to that demonstrated here by Methylene Blue, it may be assumed that the same type of concentration of active ingredients would be observed with them. Experimental conditions may be modified, as known to those of skill in the art, in order to achieve hydrogels having consistencies suitable for different applications. Thus, for example, the plasticity and/or elasticity of the hydrogels may be modified by varying the amounts of PEG and protein used to synthesize the hydrogels, the length of the bifunctionalized PEG used or the nature of the protein used. Further, the physical appearance of the hydrogels may be adjusted depending on the application. For example, the hydrogel solution may be synthesized in different forms (such as films, blocks, etc.) by pouring it between glass plates or in a plastic mould. Once set, the hydrogel may be broken up to form particles of different sizes. Those particles could also be made by suspension or emulsion polymerization. Applications for the novel hydrogels prepared by the process described herein include the following: • Drug-release devices that could be used in systemic, intra-tumoral, sub-cutaneous, topical, transdermic and rectal applications; • Wound dressings or artificial skins; • Solid humidified reaction mediums for diagnostic kits, for use in fundamental research (PCR, RT-PCR, in situ hybridization, in situ labelling with antibodies or other markers such as peptides, DNA or RNA probes, medicaments or hormones, etc.), etc.; • Transport mediums for cells, tissues, organs, eggs, organisms, etc.; • Tissue culture mediums, with or without active agents, for fundamental research, or commercial and therapeutic applications; • Electrode materials (with or without enzymes); • lontophoretic membranes; • Protective humidified mediums for tissue sections (such as replacement coverglasses for microscope slides); and • Matrices for the immobilization of enzymes or proteins for in vivo, in vitro or ex vivo use as therapeutic agents, bioreactors or biosensors. • Cosmeceutical applications, such as skin hydrators or moisturizers A dry form of these hydrogels (obtained after dehydration under vacuum or in acetone) can also be used in the following manner: firstly, as a water or exudate absorbent in wound dressing and secondly, as a slow or controlled drug release device. Although the present invention has been described by way of preferred embodiments thereof, it can be modified, without departing from the spirit and nature of the subject invention as defined in the appended claims. LIST OF REFERENCES 1. N. A. Peppas, Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy, Vol. 1-3, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1987. 2. Corkhill, P. H., C. J. Hamilton and B. J. Tighe. 1990. Crit. Rev. Biocompat, 5:363; Graham, N. B. 1992. Polyethylene glycol) Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications, J. Milton Harris, ed., New York: Plenum Press, p. 263. 3. D'Urso, E. M. and G. Fortier. 1994. J. Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 9:368. 4. D'Urso, E. M. and G. Fortier. 1994. Biotechnology Techniques, 8:71. 5. Abuchowski, A., J. R. McCoy, T. van Es, N. C. Palczuk and F. F. Davis. 1977. J. Bi . Chem., 252: 3582. 6. E. M. D'Urso, J.-F. Jacques and G. Fortier, Bioapplication of Poly(ethylene glycol)-Albumin Hydrogels: Matrix for Enzyme Immobilization in Hydrogels and Biodegradable Polymers for Bioapplications (1996: American Chemical Society), Chapter 4, p. 27. 7. Bray, J. C. and E. W. Merrill. 1973. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 7:431 ; Bekhuis, W. H. and B. E. McCarey. 1985. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 26:1634. 8. Schaefer, D. and R. Schaefer. 1985. To Alcon Laboratories Inc., U.S. Patent 4,546,123 A; Donshik, P. et al. 1988. CLAO J., 14:191 ; Gruber, E. 1988. CLAO J., 14:195. 9. Wang, P. J. and N. A. Samji. 1981. Polym. Sci. Technol., 14:29; Nalbandian, R. M. et al. 1987. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 21 : 1135. 10. L. Olanoff and J. M. Anderson. 1979. J. Pharm. Sci., 68:1151 ; Law, T. K., A. T. Florence and T. L. Whateley. 1986. Int. J. Pharm., 33:65; Graham, N. B. and M. E. McNeil. 1988. Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp., 19:255. 11.M. Laliberte and G. Fortier. Surface Modification of Horseradish Peroxidase with Poly(ethylene glycol) of various molecular masses. I: Preparation of Reagents and Characterization of Horseradish Peroxidase-Poly(ethylene glycol) Adducts. 1993. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 17: 115-130. 12. R.E. Brown, K.L. Jarvis and K.J. Hyland. Protein Measurement using Bicinchonic Acid: Elimination of Interfering Substance. 1989. Analytical Biochemistry, 180: 136-139. 13.G.E.C. Sim and T.J. Sharpe. A Method for Estimation of Polyethylene Glycol in Plasma Protein Fraction. Analytical Biochemistry,107:Q0-Q3. 14. Richard J. LaPorte, Hydrophilic Polymer Coatings for Medical Devices: Structure/Properties, Development, Manufacture and Applications. 1997. Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA, at pages 41-44.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A process for preparing a polymerized hydrophilic water-swellable hydrogel comprising reacting a bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide with a protein derived from a vegetal source, marine source or milk in aqueous solution under basic conditions. 2. A process as defined in claim 1 , wherein said basic conditions are provided by a strong base without a buffer system. 3. A process as defined in claim 1 or 2, wherein said bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide has the general formula (I): X— O— (CH 2 CH 2 O) n — X (I) wherein X represents a functionalized group capable of reacting with an NH 2) an OH or a COOH group, and n may range from 45 to 800. 4. A process as defined in claim 3, wherein said polyethylene oxide is polyethylene glycol. 5. A process as defined in any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said protein is selected from the group consisting of casein, hydrolyzed wheat protein and casein. 6. A process as defined in any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein said strong base is selected from the group consisting of: NaOH, KOH, LiOH, RbOH, CsOH and triethylamine. 7. A process as defined in claim 6, wherein said strong base is NaOH or KOH. 8. A polymerized hydrophilic water-swellable hydrogel produced by a process as defined in any one claims 1 to 7. 9. A polymerized hydrophilic water-swellable hydrogel consisting essentially of a cross-linked mixture resulting from the reaction in an aqueous solution under basic conditions of an activated bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide with a protein selected from a vegetal source, marine source or milk. 10. A hydrogel as defined in claim 9, wherein said basic conditions are provided by a strong base without a buffer system. 11.A hydrogel as defined in claim 9 or 10, wherein said protein is selected from the group consisting of hydrolyzed soy protein, hydrolyzed wheat protein and casein. 12. A hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 9 to 11 , wherein said bifunctionalized polyethylene oxide has the general formula: X— O— (CH 2 CH 2 O) n — X (I) wherein X represents a functionalized group capable of reacting with an NH 2 , an OH or a COOH group, and n may range from 45 to 800. 13. A hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 9 to 12, wherein said polyethylene oxide is polyethylene glycol. 14. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 9 to 13 in the making of a medicament comprising a physiologically active compound to be administered to a mammal in a therapeutically effective amount. 15. The use of claim 14, further comprising a physiologically acceptable carrier. 16. The use of claim 14 or 15, wherein_ said hydrogel consists of a controlled drug release composition in a physiological form suitable for systemic, intra-tumoral, sub-cutaneous, topical, transdermic or rectal administration. 17. The use of any one of claims 14 to 16, wherein said hydrogel constitutes a wound dressing or artificial skin. 18. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as a matrix for the immobilization of enzymes or proteins. 19. The use of claim 18, wherein said matrix serves as a therapeutic agent, or is part of a bioreactor or a biosensor. 20. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as a solid humidified reaction medium. 21. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as a transport medium. 22. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as a tissue culture medium. 23. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as electrode material. 24. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as an iontophoretic membrane. 25. Use of a hydrogel as defined in any one of claims 8 to 13 as a protective humidified medium.

Inventors: BRISSON JEAN-FRANCOIS, FAURE MARIE-PIERRE, PINARD KARL, BRISSON, JEAN-FRANCOIS, FAURE, MARIE-PIERRE, PINARD, KARL
Applicants: BIOARTIFICIAL GEL TECHNOLOGIES, BRISSON JEAN FRANCOIS, FAURE MARIE PIERRE, PINARD KARL, BIOARTIFICIAL GEL TECHNOLOGIES INC., BRISSON, JEAN-FRANCOIS, FAURE, MARIE-PIERRE, PINARD, KARL
Application year: 2001
Main classification: C08H1
IPC codes: A61K47, A61L15, A61L27, C08H1, C08J3, C08L101