METHOD FOR PRODUCING GENOMIC LIBRARIES AND GENOMIC LIBRARIES PRODUCED THEREWITH

Abstract: Disclosed is a method for producing genetic libraries having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kilobases and larger and libraries produced using the method. The method includes extracting DNA from a sample in the absence of any isolation of source organisms present in the sample from which the DNA originates, size-fractionating the extracted DNA and isolating DNA of at least 50 kb and larger; digesting the DNA of at least 50 kb and larger; size-fractionating the digested DNA and isolating DNA of at least 40 kb and larger; inserting the DNA of at least 40 kb and larger into a vector; and then transforming the vector into a suitable host to yield a library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kb and larger.

Description: METHOD FOR PRODUCING GENOMIC LIBRARIES AND GENOMIC LIBRARIES PRODUCED THEREWITH REFERENCE TO GOVERNMENT GRANT This invention was made with United States Government support awarded by NIH Grant # AI42786. The United States Government has certain rights in this invention. FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to methods for cloning large-size genomic libraries and libraries created therewith. More specifically, the invention is related to methods for creating genomic libraries containing very large segments of contiguous genomic DNA from uncultured and unculturable soil microbes and from such microbes from their natural environments. BACKGROUND The biosphere is dominated by microorganisms, yet most microbes in nature have not been studied. Traditional methods for culturing microorganisms limit analysis to those that grow under laboratory conditions. The recent surge of research in molecular microbial ecology provides compelling evidence for the existence of many novel types of microorganisms in the environment that dwarf, in numbers and variety, the relatively few microorganisms amenable to laboratory cultivation (Hugenholtz, P. , et al. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180:4765-4774; Ward, D. M., et al. (1990) Nature 345:63-65; Giovannoni, S. J., et al. (1990) Nature 345:60-63). Corroboration comes from estimates of DNA complexity and the discovery of many unique 16S rRNA gene sequences from numerous environmental sources. Collectively, the genomes of the total microbiota found in nature, termed the "metagenome" by the present inventors, contain vastly more genetic information than the genomes of the culturable subset. Given the profound utility and importance of microorganisms to all biological systems, methods are needed to access the wealth of information locked up in the metagenome. Previous methods to examine metagenomic DNA have focused on PCR-based methods to access novel gene fragments (Seow, K. T., et al. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179: 7360-7368), and on cloning small fragments into high-copy expression vectors (Short, J. M. , (1997) Nature Biotechnol. 15:1322-1323). PCR-based methods result in a misrepresentation of the amplified inserts due to unequal amplification in the PCR. Other methods have used sequencing to identify novel genes from large cloned fragments (Stein, J. L., et al. (1996) /. Bacteriol. 178:591-599). However, none of the above-noted approaches yields a library containing consistently large genomic DNA inserts (i.e. , a library having an average insert size of about 40 kb or greater) carried in low copy number vectors. Such a library, described herein, increases the efficiency of discovering novel genes and novel gene products because a far larger percentage of the inserts, as compared to prior art methods, may contain an entire open reading frame. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Described herein is a method to construct and screen bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries made with DNA isolated directly from soil and other environmental samples. Sequence analysis of selected BACs and of 16S rRNA genes in the libraries made according to the present invention confirm the novelty of the genomic information cloned in the libraries. The results show that DNA extracted directly from soil is a valuable source of new genetic information and is accessible using BAC libraries. Detectable levels of several biochemical activities from BAC library clones were also found. These results demonstrate that both traditional and functional genomics of uncultured and presumably unculturable microorganisms can be carried out using this approach, and that screening metagenome libraries for desired biological activities or gene sequences can also provide a basis for conducting functional genomic analyses of uncultured and/or unculturable microorganisms. The method of constructing a library described herein is applicable to DNA from virtually any source, including soil, insect intestines, plant rhizospheres, microbial mats, sulfur springs, ocean and fresh water ecosystems, and extremeophile organisms found in the harsh environments surrounding thermal vents, geysers, and the like. The source of the DNA to be inserted into the library is not critical to the operation of the invention. In short, the invention is directed to a method of producing a genomic library having an average nucleic acid insert size of about 40 kilobases or larger and libraries constructed using the present method. The method comprises extracting DNA from a sample in the absence of any isolation of source organisms present in the sample from which the DNA originates and then size-fractionating the extracted DNA and isolating DNA of about 50 kb and larger. The isolated DNA is then partially digested and the partially-digested DNA again size- fractionated. DNA of at least 40 kb and larger is isolated after the second size-fractionation. The DNA of at least 40 kb and larger is then inserted into a vector, preferably a BAC vector, and the vector is transformed into a suitable host to yield a library having an average nucleic acid insert size of about 40 kb or larger. The preferred host is Escherichia coli. A principal aim of the present invention is to provide a method for producing genomic libraries wherein the genomic DNA inserts have an average size of at least 40 kb and larger. It is a further aim of the present invention to provide a method for producing genomic libraries containing DNA from unknown, uncultured, and/or unculturable microbes from soil or any other source. The probable magnitude of the soil metagenome, encompassing the collective genomes of all microbes in soil, requires large-scale approaches for analysis, and its inaccessibility via traditional methods demands approaches that are culture-independent. The invention described herein demonstrates the feasibility of cloning metagenomic DNA into BAC libraries maintained in E. coli, an approach that is both large in scale and independent of culturing methods. The invention therefore provides a route to study the phylogenetic, physical, and functional properties of the metagenome. Gene expression from foreign DNA cloned into the low copy number BAC vector has been readily detected in a small library (designated SL1) containing only 100 Mb of DNA. A much larger library (designated SL2) was also constructed using the subject invention, thereby demonstrating that construction of metagenomic BAC libraries on a large scale is possible. The use of BACs to express Bacillus cereus genomic DNA is reported in Rondon, M.R., et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6451-6455. The advantage of BAC vectors for use in the present invention is that they maintain very large DNA inserts (greater than 100 kb) in a stable manner in E. coli (Shizuya, H., et al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:8794-8797), thus facilitating cloning large fragments of DNA . The results of the present invention validate the initial conception that the low copy BAC vector (one to two per cell (Shizuya, H., et al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:8794-8797) can be used to express foreign DNA from foreign promoters in E. coli. Of particular utility is that the direct cloning approach of the subject invention provides a method to expand the investigation of soil microbial diversity to the majority of microbes that may not be cultivatable by standard methods. It also enables genetic analysis of unknown and uncultured organisms from virtually any source. Several BAC clones containing novel 16S rRNA gene sequences have been recovered using the invention. Phylogenetic inference (including analysis of genes other than rRNA-encoding genes) is a crucial step in metagenome analysis. Consequently, BAC libraries can serve as a link between the phylogeny of uncultured soil microbes and their physiological and genetic activities encoded on metagenomic fragments captured in BAC libraries. One manner in which the invention is distinct from previous methods of examining metagenomic DNA is that it combines cloning large fragments of DNA with direct screening for functional gene expression, taking advantage of the unique properties of the BAC vector. The method complements and is distinct from existing approaches to exploit genetic diversity of noncultured, including nonculturable, microbes. Many soil microbes produce important secondary metabolites and other useful products. Furthermore, genes required for secondary metabolite production, along with accessory resistance and regulatory genes, are often clustered in one contiguous segment on the chromosome of the producing organism. Thus, BAC libraries prepared according to the present invention, the individual clones of which can contain DNA inserts of over 100 kb, offer a new source for natural products discovery. Most of the current approaches in microbiology are based on the pure culture technique. While leading to remarkable discoveries, this technique is now seen to be incomplete in light of accumulating evidence that culturing provides poor access to many microorganisms in the environment. Discovery of novel 16S rRNA gene sequences from environmental samples provides a window into a world of microbial diversity that is astonishing in its magnitude and breadth (Hugenholtz, P. , et al. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180:4765-4774). The challenge addressed by the subject invention moves beyond 16S rRNA gene cataloging and toward an understanding of the functional roles and physiology of microbes in nature. Further aims, objects, and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon a complete reading of the Detailed Description and attached claims, which follow. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the metagenomic cloning strategy. FIG. 2 is a graph of the insert size range in the soil metagenome libraries SL1 and SL2 described in the Examples. FIG, 3 is a graph of the insert sizes of SL2 clones. FIG. 4 is a restriction digest analysis of 10 representative clones from SL2. FIG. 5 is a phylogenetic tree placing 16S rRNA sequences from SL1 clones. FIG. 6 is an image of the screen of SL2 for hemolytic positive clones. FIG. 7A is a restriction digest analysis of amylase and lipase clones from SL1. FIG. 7B is a restriction digest analysis of he olytic clones from SL2. FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of the sequence analysis of clone SL1-36C7. FIG. 9 A is a predicted amino acid sequence of an antibacterial ORF. FIG. 9B is a Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity profile of the antibacterial ORF of FIG. 9A. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Many of the steps noted herein for the manipulation of DNA, including digesting with restriction endonucleases, amplifying by PCR, hybridizing, ligating, separating and isolating by gel electrophoresis, transforming cells with heterologous DNA, selecting successful transformants, and the like, are well known and widely practiced by those skilled in the art and are not extensively elaborated upon herein. Unless otherwise noted, the nucleic acid protocols utilized herein are described extensively in Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis, (1989), "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual," Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY. A first embodiment of the invention is a method for creating a genomic library containing large inserts of DNA from a source that contains unknown, uncultured, and presumably unculturable microorganisms. Preferably, the source of the DNA is an uncultured soil sample, although any sample will suffice and function with equal success. A second embodiment of the invention is libraries created using the above method. When DNA is obtained from a soil sample, it is usually contaminated with unknown impurities which can reduce the efficiency and recovery, and/or foul subsequent manipulations of the DNA. Oftentimes, DNA from soil has a brown color. Therefore, the extraction of DNA from at least soil samples preferably includes steps to eliminate such contaminants. In the preferred embodiment, the extraction of DNA from a soil sample begins with adding a buffer to the sample, thereby permitting the DNA to dissolve in the buffer. Additional steps to remove contaminants can include, but are not limited to, organic extraction, alcohol precipitation, and gel purification on a first gel. To minimize the effect of nucleases on the very large segments of contiguous genomic DNA, it is important to move quickly through the manipulations of the DNA. Preferably, the manipulations are done within a two to three week time frame. Following extraction, the DNA is further purified and size- fractionated. Preferably, the DNA is purified on a pulsed-field electrophoresis gel, followed by size-selection of the desired DNA fragments from the gel, and electroelution of the desired DNA fragments. In this first round of purification and size fractionation, DNA preferably having a nominal length of at least 50 kb and larger is selected. The electroeluted DNA is then concentrated by dialyzing (or by any other suitable means). Alternatively, DNA fragments are passively eluted with or without the inclusion of a DNA-binding matrix. Other alternatives to electroeluting include the addition of an enzyme that digests the gel matrix, thereby freeing the DNA. The DNA may also be purified via organic extraction and alcohol precipitation, for example, and the resulting DNA size-fractionated by any suitable means, such as density gradient centrifugation. Next, the initially size-fractionated DNA is converted into smaller fragments, such that it can be cloned into a vector. Methods of such a conversion include, but are not limited to, enzymatic digestion and mechanical shearing. Shearing can be accomplished by moving DNA through a small bore needle attached to a syringe, for example. Digestion is typically accomplished with restriction endonucleases—enzymes that recognize a specific nucleotide sequence site and make a double-stranded cut at the site. Digestion can be done to completion, in which all available restriction sites are cut. Digestion can also be partial, wherein only some of the restriction sites are cut. When compared to complete digestion, partial digestion of DNA produces less fragments that are, on the average, of greater length. Because the goal is to create libraries having large insertions, partial deletion is preferred to complete digestion, although complete digestion may be done, for example, with a rare-cutting enzyme, if desired. Following digestion, the DNA is again purified and size-fractionated, in the same fashion as described above. In the preferred embodiment, the DNA is again purified on a pulsed-field electrophoresis gel, followed by size-selecting the desired DNA fragments from the gel, and electroeluting the desired DNA fragments. In this second round of purification and size fractionation, it is preferred that DNA having a nominal length of at least 40 kb and larger be selected. The electroeluted DNA is then concentrated by dialyzing (or by any other suitable means). For cloning, a vector must be prepared to accept the DNA fragments. For example, a vector can be digested with a restriction endonuclease to generated suitable single-stranded overhangs (sticky ends) to accept a foreign DNA fragment. Alternatively, some commercially available vectors are available to accept DNA fragments without prior restriction. Assuming the vector must be digested with a restriction enzyme to generate the appropriate sticky ends, after digestion, it is preferred that the vector is further treated to enhance the ligation efficiency. Preferably, the vector is dephosphorylated to reduce or prevent religation of vector without a genomic DNA insert. The dephosphorylated vector is optionally treated with ligase and run on a gel to separate any ligated vector from the unligated vector. Isolation of the unligated vector from the gel can be done with one of the techniques listed above or any technique known in the art. Ligation of the genomic DNA segments to the vector can be done by techniques known in the art and need not be discussed herein (see the Examples). Host cells, preferably bacterial cells, and more preferably still E. coli cells, are then transformed by any means (electroporation is preferred) with the ligated DNA to form a genomic library containing very large inserts. The cells of the library can then be screened by any means now known or developed in the future to discover new 16S rRNA genes, new structural genes, promoters, or other regulatory sequences. The library may also be screened by biological activity to identify novel activities seen in the library cells, biological activities which are not exhibited by the untransformed host cells. EXAMPLES The following examples are included herein solely to aid in a more complete understanding of the invention disclosed and claimed herein. The Examples do not limit the scope of the invention in any fashion. Library construction: To gain access to the genomes of all soil microbes, including those that are not readily culturable, methods to extract and clone large DNA fragments from soil were developed. Then this DNA was used to construct metagenomic libraries in pBeloBACl l. A schematic representation of the metagenomic cloning strategy is shown in FIG. 1. Two libraries were prepared. They are designated herein as SL1 and SL2. SL2 is the larger of the two libraries, both in the number of clones and the amount of heterologous DNA within the library. Bacterial strains and plasmids: E. coli strain DH10B and the BAC vector pBeloBACll were used (provided by H. Shizuya (Kim, U.J., et al. (1996) Genomics 34:213-218). B. subtilis strain BR151(pPL608) is available under accession number 1E32 (lys-3 metBlO trpCl) from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. λ-Tn/?ΛøA was used as described in the literature. (Rondon, M. R., et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6451-6455). SL1: DNA extraction from soil: To construct theSLl library, soil was collected from the West Madison Agricultural Research Station in Madison, Wisconsin. The site has been previously characterized and found to contain a diverse community of Bacteria and Archaea. Five grams of soil was suspended in 13.5 ml of buffer (100 mM Tris- HC1, pH 8.0; 100 mM sodium EDTA, pH 8.0; 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0; 1.5 mM NaCl; 1 % CTAB) and 100 μl proteinase K (10 mg/ml) as described by Zhou, J., et al. (1996) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:316-322, and incubated at 60°C for about 2 hours with occasional gentle shaking. The suspension was then extracted with an equal volume of chloroform, and the DNA in the supernatant was precipitated with isopropanol. Precipitated DNA was dissolved in 500 μ water and run into a low melting temperature agarose gel ("SEAPLAQUE"-brand, FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, Maine). After electrophoresis at 100 V for 1 hour, a strip from each side of the gel was cut off and stained to localize the DNA. The DNA-containing regions were cut from the rest of the gel (unstained) and stored overnight in 0.5 x tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane/ ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (TE) buffer plus polyamines The isolated gel zone containing DNA was digested with "GELASE" -brand enzyme (Epicentre, Madison, Wis.). Preparation of the pBeloBACll vector, digestion of the insert DNA with Hindlll, ligation, and transformation were done as follows with the modifications listed in Rondon, M. R. , et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6451-6455. Because BAC vectors are single copy plasmids, it can be difficult to obtain a large amount of BAC vector DNA. Extra care is also needed to minimize the contamination from E. coli DNA which makes up about 99% of the total DNA. Preparation of BAC Vector DNA: Starting from a single colony (a blue colony on an X-gal/IPTG plate), E. coli containing pBeloBACl l vector were cultured in 3 liters of LB +chloramphenicol (15 μg/ul) with good aeration overnight. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the cell pellet was resuspended in Solution I (25 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0; 50 mM Glucose (without lysozyme)), using 25 ml Solution I per liter culture. Lysozyme was added to 2.5mg/ml, and mixed by inversion. Solution II (0.2 N NaOH; 1 % SDS) (50 ml per liter culture) was added and mixed well by inversion. The mixture was left on ice for 10 minutes. Solution III, 37 ml, (5 M Potassium Acetate, pH 4.8; made by adding glacial acetic acid to a solution of 3 M potassium acetate to achieve a pH 4.8) was added per liter culture, gently mixed by swirling, and kept on ice for 10 minutes. Then, the mixture was centrifuged for 30 minutes at 8,000 x g or higher at 4°C. The supernatant was decanted and filtered through several layers of cheesecloth. RNase was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mg/ml, and incubated at room temperature for 15-30 minutes. Using four QIAGEN-brand (Valencia, California) Qiagen-tips 500, the supernatant was pre-purified as instructed by the Qiagen procedure. Qiagen tips were pre-equilibrated with QBT, the supernatant was applied, tips were washed with large volumes of QC, and DNA was eluted by 15 ml of QF per column. QBT, QC, and QF were supplied by Qiagen. The DNA was precipitated by adding 0.7 volume of isopropanol, and mixing. The mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The DNA pellet was washed with ice cold 70% ethanol, and air dried. The DNA was resuspended in 18.6 ml of TE. For CsCl banding of the DNA, CsCl was added and dissolved. EtBr (0.4 ml, 10 mg/ml) was added and mixed. The samples were ultracentrifuged for 2-3 days at 45,000 rpm in a Beckman 70. ITi rotor. Two bands were visible under U. V. light. The lower band was isolated, and it was extracted with isoamylalcohol 3-4 times and dialyzed for a few hours in TE at 4°C. The DNA was ethanol precipitated, the pellet was rinsed with 70% ethanol, and DNA pellet was dissolved in TE. Isolated DNA was stored at -20° C. The ligation was set up with an approximate molar ratio of vector to insert of 10: 1. Every time a new batch of DNA was used, trial ligations were set up with varying amounts of vector. A typical reaction contained 100 ng of insert DNA with an average size of 200 kb and 36.5 ng vector in a volume of between 120 and 150 μl. The reaction mixture included 100 μl DNA, 1.8 μl pBAC (20 ng/ml), 12.0 μl 10 X ligation buffer, 2.0 μl 10 X PA, 0.5 μl ligase 400U/ul, and 3.7 μl H 2 O. Insert DNA, vector, PA, and H 2 O were combined. The mixture was heated 5 minutes at 65 °C, and then cooled on ice. Ligase buffer and enzyme were added and mixed by slowly stirring contents. The ligation mix was incubated overnight at 16°C. After the ligation, drop-dialysis of sample against approximately 25 ml 0.5 X TE, 1 X PA was performed for 2 hours at room temperature in a 100 mm petri dish. 1 X PA is a mixture of spermine and spermidine which has a combined concentration of 1 M (Sρermidine-4HC1 MW 254.6, Sρermine-3HC1 MW 348.6). Both were dissolved in water, and filter sterilized. Frozen aliquots were stored at -20°C. (100 X PA stock = Spermidine 75 mM (0.19g/10ml) + Spermine 30 mM (0.104g/10 ml); 1000 X PA stock =Spermidine 750 mM (1.9g/10ml) + Spermine 300 mM (1.04g/10 ml)) Preparation of Competent Cells: Flasks of SOB (without Mg ++ , see Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis, (1989), Appendix A, page A.2) were inoculated by diluting a fresh saturated (overnight) culture of DH10B 1: 1000 (i.e., 0.3 ml to a flask containing 300 ml medium). Cultures were grown with shaking at 37 °C until OD 550 reached 0.7 (no higher than 0.8). This took approximately 5 hr when shaken at 200 rpm. Cells were harvested by spinning in GSA rotor for 10 minutes at 5,000 rpm. The pellet was resuspended in a volume of 10% sterile glycerol that was equal to the original culture volume and spun 10 minutes at 5,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was carefully poured off (to avoid dislodging pellet) and the cells were resuspended again in 10% glycerol that was equal to the original culture volume. The resuspended cells were spun 10 minutes at 5,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was carefully poured off, and the cells were resuspended in the volume of glycerol remaining in the centrifuge bottle. The cells were pooled in one small centrifuge tube, which was spun 10 minutes at 7,000 rpm in SS34 rotor. The supernatant was poured off and the cells were resuspended in 10% glycerol, using a volume of 2.0 ml per liter of initial culture. The resuspended cells were aliquoted to microfuge tubes (100-200 μl per tube) and quickly frozen in a dry ice-ethanol bath. Cells were stored at -70°C. Electroporation: Cuvettes were washed and UV sterilized, placed on ice, and culture tubes were prepare with 0.5 ml SOC. Cells were thawed and 25-30 μl of cells were aliquoted to microfuge tubes on ice. 1-3 μl of ligation mix was added, and gently mixed by flicking tube bottom. The mixture was transferred to a cuvette, and the cuvette was wiped dry. The mixture was electroporated using settings of 100 Ohms, 2.5 kV, and 25 μFa. This usually gave a time constant of approximately 2.4 msec. The contents of the cuvette were immediately rinsed with SOC and transferred to a culture tube using a sterile Pasteur pipet. The cells were shaken for 45 minutes at 37 °C. The cells were then spread on LB plates containing 12.5 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 50 μg/ml X Gal and 25 μg/ml IPTG. White colonies were picked onto plates gridded to be compatible with 96-well microtiter plates. The library was replicated into duplicate sets of 96-well microtiter plates with freezing medium (36 M K 2 PO 4 , 13.2 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 1.7 mM sodium citrate, 0.4 mM MgSO 4 , 6.8 mM (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 4.4% v/v glycerol, LB) (Woo, S.S., et al. (1994) Nucl. Acids Res. 22:4922-4931) and stored at -80 C. SL1 is a prototype metagenome library and contained 3648 clones arrayed in 38 96-well microtiter plates. Referring to FIG.2, which is a graph of the insert size range in SL1 and SL2, grouping clones within a range of 10 kb, approximately 2% (N = 81) of the clones were examined for inserts; 97% contained insert DNA, with an average insert size of 27 kb. It was estimated that there was approximately 100 Mb of DNA contained in SL1. Based on restriction digest analysis, the clones fell into two classes: those with Notl sites within the insert, and those with no internal Notl sites. Given that the recognition sequence of Notl is GC-rich, this suggests that the library contains DNA varying in GC content. As extraction and cloning steps will contribute to biases in the DNA represented in the library, it is important to monitor indicators of diversity. SL2: A second soil library (designated SL2) was also constructed. The protocol used to construct SL2 was based, in part, on the SL1 protocol. Details of the protocol are listed below. Modifications to the SL1 protocol as used to construct SL2 are as follows. Vector preparation was as above, but included a ligation step after the dephosphorylation followed by gel purification to remove any self-ligated product. pBeloBACll vector was subsequently electroeluted from the gel slice and dialyzed against 1 x TE. Further modifications included running approximately 100 μg of metagenomic DNA on a preparative pulsed-field preparative gel ("CHEF MAPPER," Bio-Rad, Hercules, California; 0.5 second switch time, 9 V/cm, 0.5 x TBE, 120° included angle, 5 hours). DNA greater than about 50 kb was isolated, electroeluted, and dialyzed against 1 x TB. Following a HindϊLI digestion, insert DNA was loaded onto a second preparative gel and size-selected to retain DNA of about 40 kb or larger. Ligation, transformation, and storage steps were performed as above. Again, further details of these modifications are listed below. pBeloBACll Vector Preparation: The vector preparation was started from a single colony of E. coil strain (HS997), which was blue on an X-gal/IPTG plate. The single colony was grown in 3 liters of LB with chloramphenicol (15 μg/μl), on a shaker at 200 rpm, at 37 °C overnight. The cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 ml Solution I per liter (using a 250 ml flask). Lysozyme was added to 2.5mg/ml, and mixed by gentle swirling. Next, 100 ml per liter culture Solution II (lysis buffer) was added, and mixed well by gentle swirling. The solution was kept on ice for a maximum of 5 minutes. Then 148 ml of Solution III (neutralization buffer) per liter of culture was added, and mixed gently by swirling. The solution was kept on ice for 10 minutes. The solution was centrifuged for 30 minutes at 8,000 x g, 4 °C. The supernatant was decanted. RNase was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mg/ml, mixed, and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. Using 4 Qiagen-tip 500s, (Qiagen, Valencia, California) the supernatant was prepurified as instructed by the Qiagen procedure: Qiagen tips were pre-equilibrated with QBT buffer, the supernatant was applied, the tip was washed with 3 x 10 ml of buffer QC, and the DNA was eluted with 3 x 5 ml of QF buffer per column. DNA was precipitated by the addition of 0.7 volume of isopropanol, mixed, and centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 30 minutes at 4 °C. DNA was resuspended in 6 mis TE and mixed. An equal volume ice-cold 5 M LiCl was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 30 minutes at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with ice-cold 70% ethanol, centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4 °C, and then air-dried for 5 minutes. The pellet was redissolved in 1 ml of 1 x TE (stored at -20 °C). Next, the vector was digested with H dIII using 20 μg of vector and 0.5 U enzyme/μg DNA/1 hour. This amount of enzyme was determined to be the minimal concentration of Hwdlll necessary to digest 20 μg of the vector. After digestion, the enzyme was then heat killed by incubating at 65 °C for 15 minutes. To minimize vector re-ligation, the digested vector was dephosphorylated with "ΗK"-brand ThermolabilePhosphatase (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, Wisconsin) in the presence of 5mM of CaCl 2 and the supplied reaction buffer. The mixture was incubated at 30° C for 2.5 hrs. After dephosphorylation, the enzyme was heat killed by incubating at 65 °C for 15 minutes. The dephosphorylated vector was then ligated for 3 hours, at 15 °C, using 15 Units T4-DNA ligase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) with Promega' s ligation buffer. The enzyme was then heat killed by incubating at 65 °C for 15 minutes. The vector was then gel purified on a 1.5% standard gel with 0.5 x TBE, and vector band was cut out (from a gel not stained with EtBr). DNA was removed from the gel by electroelution and then dialyzed against 0.5 X TE. The DNA was then quantified by gel electrophoresis. The final DNA concentration was 16.8 μg/ml, for a total of 7.5 μg of DNA. Preparation of Insert DNA for Ligation: The starting material was genomic soil DNA, which was isolated and then frozen at -80 °C. The soil DNA (90 μg loaded total at 225 μg/ml) was run on a pulsed-field compression preparative gel ("CHEF MAPPER," Bio-Rad, Hercules, California; (0.5 sec. switch time, 0.5x TBE, 9 v/cm, 120° included angle, 5 hrs). A band containing DNA sized at 50 kb and up was cut from the unstained gel. The DNA was eluted from the gel by electroelution (3 v/cm, 12 hrs, 4 °C), and dialyzed for 1.5 hrs. at 4 °C against 0.5 x TE. The DNA was then quantified by a standard gel with EtBr. A total of 5.7 μg (11.9 μg/ml) was recovered. To determine the units required to partially digest the DNA, a Hind III digest time course was performed using a positive and a negative controls, 4 enzyme concentrations, and 0.16 μg DNA/reaction. The 4 enzyme concentrations tested were 12.6, 25.2, 37.8, and 63.0 U/μg DNA/hour. It was determined that -25 U/μg DNA/hour was optimal; that is, 25.2 U/μg DNA/hour gave many more transformants with no apparent decrease in size of the inserts. Based on the enzyme titration above, a preparative digest was performed on - 1.75 μg of sized (-50-150 kb) DNA. DNA was run on a pulsed-field compression preparative gel (1 sec. switch time, other conditions same as above), and a band of 40 kb and up (gel was not stained with EtBr) was cut. The sized DNA was electroeluted, and dialyzed against 0.5 x TE (with the same conditions as above). The DNA was quantified using an ethidium bromide stained standard gel. A total of 0.4 μg was determined, with the DNA at 0.9 μg/ml. Ligation: Several vector-to-insert ratios were tested: 20: 1, 10: 1, 5: 1, and 1: 1 (assuming an average insert size of 50 kb). A 20: 1 and a 10: 1 ratio vector-to-insert concentration were found to give the best results, with a 10: 1 ratio having slightly better results. Insert DNA (60.5 ng) and vector DNA (89.5 ng) were ligated in 100 μl final volume (1.5 μg/ml final concentration). The mixture was heated to 65 °C for 10 minutes, then cooled on ice prior to adding the supplied T4 DNA ligase buffer and 1 μl (3U) of T4 DNA ligase (Promega). The ligation mixture was incubated overnight at 16°C, and stored in dark at 4°C until transformation was performed (about 5 days for a large scale prep). tRNA precipitation of ligated DNA: To concentrate the ligated DNA, a tRNA precipitation was done as described in Zhu, H. and R. Dean (1999) Nucleic Acids Research 27:910-911. The ligation mixture was incubated at 60 °C for 15 minutes, and then cooled on ice. To the cooled ligation mixture, 1 μg of tRNA per 5 μl of ligation mixture was added for a total of 80 μl ligation mix total). One volume of EtOH was added, and the mix was chilled at about -20°C for 20 minutes. Next, the DNA was centrifuged down and rinsed once with 70% EtOH. The pellet was air dried 5 minutes, 5 μl H 2 O was added, and incubated on ice 1.5 hr to resolubilize pellet. Transformation: To transform E. coli cells, 5 μl ligated DNA was added to 200 μl of electrocompetent DH10B E. coli cells on ice and transferred to a prechilled 0.2 ml electroporation cuvette. The cells were electroporated using settings of 2.5 kv, 100 ohms, 25 μFa. The cells were then transferred to 3 mis of SOC media and incubated with shaking 45 minutes. After incubation, the cells were plated out 100 μl on 30 LB A plates with 12.5 μg/ml chloroamphenicol and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hrs. Library Storage The genomic clones were stored at -80 °C in 96-well plates in a freezing media containing tryptone at 10 g/L, yeast extract at 5 g/L, NaCl at 10 g/L, agar at 15 g/L, 36.2 mM K 2 HPO 2 , 13.2 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 1.9 mM Na citrate, 602.50 mM glycerol, 0.40 mM MgSO 4 , and 6.81 mM (NH 4 )SO 4 . These improvements led to the results shown in FIG. 2, which is a graph of clones by insert size. FIG. 3 shows the insert size of representative clones, with the Notl fragment sizes shown as differently patterned parts of each bar in the bar graph. SL2 contains 24,576 clones. Based on an analysis of 132 clones (0.5% of total), the library has an average insert size of 44.5 kb, in which greater than 60% of the inserts are larger than 40 kb. On X-gal/IPTG plates, 99.7% of the colonies were white, and 0.3% were blue. The transformation efficiency was -2.1 x 10 5 cfu/μg DNA. The percent of clones with inserts was 99.2%. SL2 contains approximately 1 Gb of DNA, possibly carrying one million genes. These statistics demonstrate that improvements to the original method resulted in a library containing considerably more metagenomic DNA with a larger average insert size. Screening the Libraries: Three types of screening of the libraries were done. First, the library was screened by restriction digest analysis of several of the individual clones of the SL2 library. FIG. 4 shows restriction digests of 10 SL2 clones with Notl and Xbάl indicating the diversity in the SL2 clones. The Notl digests produce varying number of bands among the clones. Again, given that the recognition sequence of Notl is GC- rich, this suggests that the library contains inserts with varying GC contents. In contrast, the recognition sequence of Xbal is GC-poor. Fewer restriction fragments resulted from the Xbal digests than the Notl digests. Given that Xbal cuts in non-GC rich regions, the Xbal digests confirm the Notl digests. Second, the library was screened for 16S rRΝA genes. The 16S rRΝA genes are evolutionarily conserved, thus indicating the phylogenetic relationship between organisms. Third, the library was screened for various biological activities, including β- lactamase, cellulase, protease, keritinase, chitinase, lipase, esterase, amylase, DΝase, siderophore, hemolytic, and antibacterial activities. The last two screens are described in detail below. PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing of 16S rRΝA gene sequences from SL1: Pools of 48 BAC clones were prepared, and BAC DΝA was isolated from pooled cultures as described hereinabove (see also Rondon, M. R. , et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6451-6455). Details of the PCR protocol designed to amplify 16S rRΝA gene sequences in the presence of contaminating E. coli DΝA is presented in copending U.S. Patent application entitled "Template-Specific Termination in a Polymerase Chain Reaction" by M.R. Liles and R.M. Goodman, incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, PCR reactions (50 μl) used 50 ng BAC DΝA, competitive (50 nM), terminator (100 nM), and universal (200 nM) primer ' s; dΝTPs (200 μM) and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin). Reactions were performed in a "ROBOCYCLER" 96-brand thermocycler (Stratagene, Inc. , La Jolla, California), using one minute denaturation at 94 °C, then 40 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 90 seconds at 58°C, and 150 seconds at 72°C, followed by a 5 minute of extension at 72°C. The presence of non-E. coli 16S rRΝA product was determined by restriction digestion of PCR products with multiple enzymes, including Alul, Haelϊl, and Hinfl. Full-length PCR products containing unique restriction fragments were subsequently re-amplified under the same PCR conditions. The resulting product was cloned into the TA cloning vector pGEM-T (Promega). Sequence information from cloned 16S rRΝA genes was obtained using the T7 and SP6 primers in "BigDye"-brand sequencing reactions (Perkin-Elmer/ Applied Biosystems, Inc. , Foster City, California), and analyzed with an ABI Model 377 automated sequencer. Resulting sequence was compared to the non-redundant sequence database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using BLAST. To begin to link physiological function and phylogenetic analysis of uncultured microorganisms, a method was developed to amplify 16S rRNA gene sequences from BAC plasmid preparations from pooled cultures, in the presence of contaminating E. coli genomic DNA. Once a positive clone was identified from a given pool of 48 BAC clones, individual clones from that pool were examined to identify the clones carrying a 16S rRNA gene. This suggested that the sequence was encoded on a BAC clone, and was not the result of a contaminant in the PCR process. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were confirmed by sequence analysis of the individual BAC clones. Seven sequences from SL1 were recovered and are listed in Table 1 below. The seven sequences fall into four different bacterial phyla (FIG. 5). The phylogenetic tree of FIG. 5 was constructed by neighbor joining analysis on 75 sequences from the represented phyla. These data show that the methods described herein for DNA extraction and cloning successfully recover DNA from widely diverse prokaryotes, including Gram-positive bacteria. In addition, the ability to identify 16S rRNA genes from uncultured microbes by this technique offers the opportunity to further investigate the biology of these organisms by sequence analysis of the entire BAC insert and by functional analysis of the genes encoded therein. TABLE 1 16S rRNA Gene Sequences Obtained from SLl SLl Insert % Identity Clone Size Closest Match 8 Phylum (bp sequenced) 5C2 23 kb Caulobacter sp. α-Proteobacteria 95% (596) 5D2 36 kb Paenibacillus kobensis Low G+C Gram 92% (1083) positive 16H1 50 kb Clone TRS28 Acidobacterium 96% (1118) 17F9 30 kb Clone 32-21 Acidobacterium 96% (1112) 59H11 76 kb Agrobacterium α-Proteobacteria 96% (955) sanguinem 65D11 27 kb Haliscomenobacter Cytophagales 92% (1313) hydrossis 67C12 37 kb Hymenobacter Cytophagales 89% (809) roseosalivarius a closest match in GenBank Screens for biological activity: Individual screens were carried out by replicating SLl onto Q-trays (Genetix, Christchurch, Massachusetts) made for the Q-BOT (Genetix), using a 96-pin array. Each Q-tray contained 250 ml of LB agar plus 10 μg per ml chloramphenicol. Following replication onto the Q-trays, colonies were incubated for 3 days at 30 °C before scoring phenotypes or performing overlays. For detecting β-lactamase activity, plates were overlaid with top agar containing 0.01 % nitrocefin (Becton Dickinson Microbiological Systems, CockeysviUe, MD). A red precipitate surrounding the colony indicated activity. For detecting cellulase activity, plates were overlaid with top agar containing 0.1 % Ostazin Brilliant Red Hydroxyethyl Cellulose (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri), dissolved in sterile water. A yellow halo around the colony indicated cellulase activity. No cellulase activity positive clones were found in SLl . For detecting protease, keratinase, chitinase, and lipase activity, the library was replicated to plates containing LB agar plus 1 % commercial nonfat dry milk, 0.5% keratin powder (ICN Biomedical, Los Angeles, California), 0.5% chitin powder (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland), or 3% Bacto Lipid (Difco, Detroit, Michigan), respectively, and scored after three days for the presence of a clear halo. In a screen of SLl, no positive clones were found for protease, keratinase, or chitinase activity, whereas two positive clones were found for lipase activity. Esterase activity was detected on LB plates containing 1 % "TWEEN" 20-brand emulsifying, wetting, and dispersing agent (Atlas Powder Co. , Wilmington, Delaware; available from Sigma), by monitoring formation of a powdery halo surrounding the colonies. In SLl, no clones having esterase activity were found. Amylase activity was detected on Bacto Starch agar plates by flooding the plates with Bacto Stabilized Gram iodine (Difco) after 3 days growth; active colonies were surrounded by a bright orange halo. Eight clones from SLl showed amylase activity. Hemolytic activity was determined in SL2 by overlaying 5 ml of blood agar on plates, followed by a 2 day incubation at 28 °C. No hemolytic clones were found in SLl , whereas 29 hemolytic clones were found in SL2. The hemolytic screening results from SL2 are shown in FIG. 6. Restriction digest analyses of these clones were done to confirm that clones resulted from independent cloning events, and are not as the result of duplicate clones. FIGS. 7A & 7B show the unique restriction fragments generated from the different clones, suggesting that they resulted from independent cloning events. FIG. * 7A shows the H dIII digested amylase and lipase clones from SLl. FIG. 7B shows Notl digested hemolytic clones from SL2. Lane 1 of FIG. 7B contains size markers. In both gels, an arrow represents the BAC vector. The variety of restriction patterns demonstrates the molecular diversity of DΝA cloned in the BAC libraries. Deoxyribonuclease (DNase) activity was tested on Bacto DNase methyl green agar (Difco). Positive colonies were surrounded by a bright orange halo. The DNase-producing clone (SL1-11G4) contains an insert of approximately 25 kb in size, as estimated by restriction digestion followed by agarose gel analysis (not shown). One transposon insertion that abolished activity was located in a potential ORF with homology to a family of single-stranded nucleases typified by 51 nuclease from Aspergillus oryzae, and including sequences of plant (e.g., Hemerocallis, Hordeum, Zinnia), fungal (Aspergillus, Penicillium), protozoal (Leishmania), and bacterial (Mesorhizobium) origin. Extended sequence analysis of the region (not shown) identified a complete ORF belonging to this family. The predicted amino acid sequence of the protein from SL1-11G4 was most similar to the nucleotidase from Leishmania donovani, with a similarity score of 1 x IO "14 . Residues important for activity that are conserved in other members are also conserved in the SL1-11G4 sequence (not shown). Siderophore activity, (i.e., the ability to bind iron) was tested with standard CAS medium (Schwyn, B. and J.B. Neilands, (1987) Anal. Biochem. 160:47-56) containing 0.1 mM additional FeSO 4 and monitoring for production of an orange halo. In this medium, the background activity of E. coli DH10B is suppressed, but siderophore overproduction can still be detected. In all cases, DHlOB/pBeloBACl l was used as a negative control and either control strains or purified enzymes were used as positive controls. In all cases, BACs were isolated from the putative positive clones and retransformed into DH10B. The resultant transformants were retested to confirm that the activity was encoded on the BAC insert. These results show that SLl contains heterologous DNA sequences that can be expressed in E. coli at detectable levels. The fact that 4 out of the 12 activities screened for were identified in SLl suggests that this method can be used successfully to extract and identify useful genetic information from environmental DNA. In the only screen of SL2, which was for hemolytic activity, 29 active clones (not shown) were identified. Further screening of SL2 is expected to yield other interesting activities. Antibacterial Screening: Colonies were grown for 2 days at 37 °C, and then overlaid with 5 ml of LB soft agar containing 0.5 ml of B. subtilis strain BR151(pPL608) grown in LB chloramphenicol to an OD^ of 0.2. Plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C and scored for activity by looking for a zone of inhibition in the B. subtilis lawn. Three clones having antibacterial activity were found. The first was clone SL1-36C7, which produced an activity that was inhibitory to B. subtilis, weakly active against Staphylococcus aureus, and not active against E. coli. The insert DNA of SL1-36C7 was completely sequenced. FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of the SL1-36C7 clone with the putative ORFs indicated by the arrows. A list of the ORFs with the protein to which they are most similar is listed on FIG. 8, with an arrow representing the potential operon shaded in gray. The antibacterial ORF is hatched. The fragment appears to be of bacterial origin, given the homology of potential genes on the insert to genes of known function. Notable in the clone is the presence of a gene cluster with similarity to the phosphate transport cluster (pstCAB-phoU) of E. coli (Wanner, B.L. , (1996) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, ed. Neidhardt, F.C. (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. ) 1: 1357- 1381). This demonstrates the potential for BAC clones to contain complete, intact operons. Mutagenesis of BAC clones with ΥnphoA (Manoil, C. and J. Beckwith, (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8129-8133) and sequencing from transposon ends were done as described (Rondon, M. R., et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 6451-6455). Insertional inactivation via transposon mutagenesis was used to identify the locus responsible for the antibacterial activity. A single candidate gene appeared to encode the activity. The nucleotide sequence of this gene showed no similarity to known sequences, suggesting that the gene encoded a protein of novel structure. The predicted protein contained a putative amino-terminal signal sequence, and at least seven long sequence repeats (FIG.9A). The predicted protein has 543 residues. Highly conserved sequences within the repeats are in bold, underlined, or in italics to highlight the repeats. The hydrophobicity plot of the predicted amino acid sequence is characteristic of a membrane protein (FIG. 9B). The gene encoding this putative ORF was cloned individually into expression plasmid pET22b as a hexahistidine-tagged construct. When transformed intoE. coli, expression strain BL21(DE3), a new protein of approximately 55 kD was produced (not shown). The subcloned gene conferred antibacterial activity to the host strain, confirming that this gene was sufficient to produce the inhibitory activity. However, the partially purified protein was not itself active. To investigate whether the antibacterial activity was due to a diffusable molecule, cells and cell growth medium were fractionated in an attempt to isolate the active substance. Antibacterial activity was consistently detected on undisturbed agar on which clone SL1-36C7 had been cultured. However, a clone-specific activity was not extracted or concentrated from liquid or agar cultures using a variety of growth conditions, filtration steps, organic extractions, and pH variations. This suggests that the activity is not due to a diffusable small molecule; rather some aspect of the protein itself, or its effect upon the host cell, is likely responsible for the inhibitory activity. Sequencing antibacterial clone SL1-36C7: Clone SL1-36C7 was sheared by sonication for 5 seconds at 80% power using an ultrasonic homogenizer 4/10 series with a microtip (Cole Palmer, Chicago, Illinois). The ends of the DNA were blunted with T4 DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, Beverly, Massachusetts) . Fragments were ligated to the vector pCR-BLUNT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) according to the manufacturer's protocol and transformed into TOP 10 E. coli cells. Transformants were plated onto LB agar containing 100 μg per ml kanamycin. Colonies were picked into 96-deep-well plates (Marsh Biosciences) and grown at 37 °C for 16 hours. Cultures were pelleted, and DNA was isolated using a Biorobot 9600 thermocycler (Qiagen, Valencia, California). DNA sequencing reactions were performed using Applied Biosystems dye terminator chemistry and were analyzed on ABI 377 machines. Sequence manipulation and alignment of clone SL1-36C7: DNA sequence was assembled using the program Sequencher (Genecodes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan). ORF analysis was performed using EditSeq (DNA Star, Madison, Wisconsin) in which ORFs greater than 100 bp were identified. Putative ORFs were translated and queried using BLAST against the NCBI nonredundant protein database. Additional annotation was obtained using PSI-BLAST (Altschul, S. F., et al. (1997) Nucl. Acids Res. 25:33 89-3402). Subcloning the antibacterial ORF from SL1-36C7: The ORF was amplified using a primer having the sequence of SEQ. ID. NO. 1, which is: 5'-CATATGTCTTTCATGAAACGGTTTTTCTGT-3'(SEQ. ID. NO: 1). At the 5' end, the sequence encodes an Ndel site. The second primer has the sequence of SEQ. ID. NO. 2, which is: 5'-CTCGAGCCTCGTAGAGTTGGGTTTGCC-3' (SEQ. ID. NO: 2). At the 3' end, this sequence encodes an Xhol site. The original BAC SL1-36C7 clone was used as a template. Amplified DNA was ligated to Ndel/Xhol-digest d pET22b (Novagen, Madison, Wisconsin). The resulting construct encoded the antibacterial ORF with a hexahistidine tag on the 3' end. The plasmid was transformed into E. coli strain BL2I(DE3) (Novagen). Transformants were tested for antibacterial activity by overlaying with B. subtilis as described above. Protein expression and purification: The recombinant antibacterial gene was expressed by growing cells in 4 x YT medium (32 g/L tryptone, 20 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl) with chloramphenicol, and inducing with 1 mM IPTG, or by letting the cells leak overnight without IPTG (Grossman, T.H. et al. (1998) Gene 209:95-103). The tagged protein was purified using "TALON"-brand Metal Affinity Resin (Clonetech, Palo Alto, California). Clone SL2-P57/G4: The third antibacterial clone was SL2-P57/G4, which was pigmented and produced several compounds. Pigments included melanin and at least two other compounds-one red and one orange. Compounds were produced at about 5mg/L and were soluble in methanol. The antibacterial property of the clone was active against B. subtilis (150 μg; 11mm) and S. aureus (200 μg; 9mm). The invention is not limited to the particular reagents, protocols, etc. described herein above, but includes all modified and equivalent forms thereof which are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims: CLAIMS What is claimed is: 1. A method of producing a genomic library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kilobases and larger comprising: (a) extracting DNA from a sample in the absence of any isolation of source organisms present in the sample from which the DNA originates; then (b) size-fractionating the extracted DNA and isolating DNA of about 50 kb and larger; (c) digesting the DNA of at least 50 kb and larger to yield digested DNA; and (d) size-fractionating the digested DNA and isolating DNA of at least 40 kb and larger; and then (e) inserting the DNA of at least 40 kb and larger into a vector; and then (f) transforming the vector into a suitable host to yield a library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kb and larger. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein in step (a) the DNA is extracted from a soil sample. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (a) the extracting comprises suspending the sample in a buffer; incubating the sample at about 60 °C for about 2 hours to release the DNA; extracting the sample with an organic solvent; and precipitating the DNA. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (b) the extracted DNA is size- fractionated by electrophoresing the DNA on a pulsed-field gel. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein in step (b), DNA of at least 50 kb and larger is isolated by cutting from the gel regions that contain DNA of at least 50 kb and larger and electroeluting the DNA from the cut regions of the gel. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein in step (c) the DNA is completely or partially digested with a restriction endonuclease. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein in step (c) the DNA is partially digested with H dIII. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (d) the digested DNA is size- fractionated by electrophoresing the DNA on a pulsed-field gel. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein in step (d), DNA of at least 40 kb and larger is isolated by cutting from the gel regions that contain DNA of at least 40 kb and larger and electroeluting the DNA from the cut regions of the gel. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (e), the DNA is inserted into a bacterial artificial chromosome vector. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the bacterial artificial chromosome vector comprises pBeloBACl 1. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein in step (f) , the vector is transformed into bacteria cells. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein in step (f), the vector is transformed into E. coli cells. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the E. coli cells comprise DH10B cells. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein in step (f) , the vector is transformed into the host by electroporation. 16. The method of claim 1, wherein step (e) further comprises, after inserting the DNA into the vector, precipitating the vector from solution by adding tRNA thereto. 17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after step (f), screening the library for heterologous 16S rRNA genes. 18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after step (f), screening the library for a heterologous functional gene. 19. The method of claim 1, further comprising, after step (f), screening the library for clones exhibiting a biological activity that is due to inserted exogenous nucleic acid. 20. The method of claim 1, further comprising, before step (e), preparing a vector, the preparation including digesting the vector, dephosphorylating the digested vector, ligating the dephosphorylated vector, and purifying the vector on a gel to separate religated vector from unligated vector, the unligated vector being used in step (e). 21. A method of producing a genomic library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kilobases and larger comprising: (a) extracting DNA from a soil sample, in the absence of any isolation of source organisms present in the sample from which the DNA originates, by suspending the sample in a buffer, incubating the sample at about 60 °C for about 2 hours to release the DNA, extracting the sample with an organic solvent, and precipitating the DNA. (b) size-fractionating the extracted DNA by electrophoresing on a pulsed- field gel and isolating DNA of at least 50 kb and larger by cutting from the gel regions that contain DNA of at least 50 kb and larger and electroeluting the DNA from the cut regions of the gel; then (c) partially digesting the DNA of at least 50 kb and larger with Hindlll to yield partially-digested DNA; and (d) size-fractionating the partially-digested DNA by electrophoresing on a pulsed-field gel and isolating DNA of at least 40 kb and larger by cutting from the gel regions that contain DNA of at least 40 kb and larger and electroeluting the DNA from the cut regions of the gel; and then (e) inserting the DNA of at least 40 kb and larger into pBeloBACl l, and precipitating the vector from solution by adding tRNA thereto; and then (f) transforming the vector into E. coli DH10B cells to yield a library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kb and larger. 22. A genomic library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least kilobases or larger produced by: (a) extracting DNA from a sample in the absence of any isolation of source organisms present in the sample from which the DNA originates; then (b) size-fractionating the extracted DNA and isolating DNA of at least 50 kb and larger; (c) digesting the DNA of at least 50 kb and larger to yield digested DNA; and (d) size-fractionating the digested DNA and isolating DNA of at least 40 kb and larger; and then (e) inserting the DNA of at least 40 kb and larger into a vector; and then (f) transforming the vector into a suitable host to yield a library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kb and larger. 23. A genomic library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least kilobases and larger produced by: (a) extracting DNA from a soil sample, in the absence of any isolation of source organisms present in the sample from which the DNA originates, by suspending the sample in a buffer, incubating the sample at about 60 °C for about 2 hours to release the DNA, extracting the sample with an organic solvent, and precipitating the DNA. (b) size-fractionating the extracted DNA by electrophoresing on a pulsed- field gel and isolating DNA of at least 50 kb and larger by cutting from the gel regions that contain DNA of at least 50 kb and larger and electroeluting the DNA from the cut regions of the gel; then (c) partially digesting the DNA of at least 50 kb and larger with Hindlll to yield partially-digested DNA; and (d) size-fractionating the partially-digested DNA by electrophoresing on a pulsed-field gel and isolating DNA of at least 40 kb and larger by cutting from the gel regions that contain DNA of at least 40 kb and larger and electroeluting the DNA from the cut regions of the gel; and then (e) inserting the DNA of at least 40 kb and larger into pBeloBACll, and precipitating the vector from solution by adding tRNA thereto; and then (f) transforming the vector into E. coli DH10B cells to yield a library having an average nucleic acid insert size of at least 40 kb and larger.

Inventors: BETTERMANN ALAN D, GOODMAN ROBERT M, HANDELSMAN JO E, RONDON MICHELLE R, BETTERMANN, ALAN, D., GOODMAN, ROBERT, M., HANDELSMAN, JO, E., RONDON, MICHELLE, R.
Applicants: WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND, WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Application year: 2001
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: A61K31, C07D209, C12N15, C12P17