CLOSED LOOP CLUTCH/BRAKE CONTROL

Abstract: A closed loop control system for a electromagnetic clutch or brake (312) has a motor to provide force, a transducer (304) to read the force and produce an error signal, and an amplifier (311) to compare the error signal to a reference signal. The amplifier (311) will produce an output signal proportional to the input signal(s) and regulate the clutch or brake (312) accordingly. Additional transducers (305, 306) can be added so that torque, velocity and position can be considered. The signals from these transducers (304, 305, 306) can also be used to further condition and control output to the brake (312) or clutch.

Description: CLOSED LOOP CLUTCH/BRAKE CONTROL 5 CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/246,176, filed November 6, 2000 (Attorney Docket No. 89664.140100). L 0 TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates in general to control systems for automated products, and in particular to a closed loop control system for electromagnetic friction device such as a clutch or brake. L5 BACKGROUND OF INVENTION A typical closed control system has a device to be controlled, a motor to provide force, an amplifier to drive the motor, and a measuring device to verify the condition of the controlled device. In an open loop system, all of the above parts need to be present except the measuring device. In this case, knowledge of both the controlled device and the force produced must exist .0 in order for the system to have some predictability. For example, a common open loop system is a stepper motor system, where an amplifier provides a controlled stream of pulses to the motor, which is then expected to make a rotational movement proportional to the number of pulses supplied. There is no verification that the motor truly made all of the required steps, but, by knowing the characteristics of the driven device and _ 5 the forces supplied by the motor, the system will in fact perform the required movements with great repeatability. The major limiting factor for such a system is the inability to change the controlled device's characteristics without also changing the force-producing device and/or the desired control features of the total system. Due to these limitations, closed loop control is used when 30 the controlled device's characteristics may change or where the system needs to have variable features depending on the function to be performed. In this case, the loop is closed with a measuring device , the output of which is typically compared with the controlling reference. The difference between the control reference and the feedback is called the error signal. One of the simplest control systems applicable to the above system is a torque controller 100 shown in Figure 1. In this case, the required torque signal would be supplied and the amplifier 103 would produce a current 105 to the motor 104, which in turn produces torque 106. A simple feedback device in this system would be a current transducer 101 in the amplifier output. This current signal 107 is differenced with the reference signal 102 and the amplifier 103 will continue to produce additional current until the feedback signal is of equal value to the reference. A potential problem in this system is the required error signal to maintain the output current that is related to torque. This residual is usually reduced to zero by incorporating an error integrator at the output of the error-summing amplifier. A second source of error lies in the false assumption that the relationship between current and torque will always be linear. Using a torque transducer to provide the torque feedback signal can compensate for this error. An important point to remember in this example is that the accuracy of the feedback element is the controlling factor in the system accuracy. A basic torque system, can be expanded to perform additional functions. A second control loop may be added to control velocity and a third loop to control position, as shown in Figure 2. The addition of the second loop requires the addition of a velocity transducer 201 to provide the feedback signal 205. Its function is the same as the torque loop and it has the same effect on the system performance. This signal is then differenced with a reference signal 203. The accuracy of the system for velocity control is only as accurate as the velocity feedback device. This control system has broad application as would be appreciated by those of skill in the art, especially those that require conditioned velocity output. To expand further on closed loop control capability, one can add an additional loop; this would typically be considered the position loop. Again, as with the other two, to make a closed loop system there must be a position transducer 202 provided to supply position-sensing information 206. This signal is then differenced with a reference signal 204. And, as indicated earlier, the accuracy of the transducer is the determining factor in the system accuracy. Up to this point, the concepts have been based on linear and continuous systems. The concept of system accuracy has been the predominant system focus. A second, and equally important, feature of closed loop systems is dynamic performance. For this analysis, both accuracy and speed are very important. In the feedback loop, the devices supplying the signals require a speed equal to or greater than the desired system speed. The control system response is typically controlled by increasing the gains in the amplifier section. The problem that results from increasing gains is that system stability will decrease. To compensate for this, some or all the loops, including the feedback loops, are modified to include signal-conditioning circuits. The addition of these tuning circuits makes finding the optimal setup very difficult. Also, the required tuning components may not be in the range required for any particular system design; therefore, setup may require component changes. All of these factors, along with the availability of digital computers and digital signal processors, have changed the method of implementing control systems. All of the gains, summations, and signal conditioning can be performed in a computer. The basic concepts and theory that were applicable in the linear system are still applicable in the digital system The hardware gains and compensation circuits are now replaced with registers. Obvious advantages include the rapid change in system parameters and essentially infinite ranges. The use of registers has also allowed the recipe loading of exact parameters for different systemperformances. Concerning the feedback loops, this change has increased the attractiveness of digital feedback devices that directly interface to the computer. However, the same constraints that applied to the linear designs still apply in the digital design-the system accuracy and speed are only as good as the feedback devices. Nonetheless, there is an exception to this statement, and it deals with our ability to linearize the feedback devices. This can be done by making corrections in the feedback signal, based on our knowledge that errors occur at given conditions. Signal correction requires knowledge of the feedback device's nonlinearities at all conditions of operation. Once known, a new parameter for the feedback device repeatability-becomes important. As with many devices, the nonlinearities are a function of material and construction. Therefore, given the same operating conditions, a device's repeatability will be better than its absolute accuracy. Therefore, if it was correctly linearized, the system accuracy can be greater than the feedback device accuracy-the penalty being additional processing time for the signal correction and the requirement to linearize the system. Although the digital system has many advantages, a new parameter must be considered when designing the overall system. By virtue of being digital, the system design has changed from a continuous format to a sampled data design. A new and important variable is the processing time the computer requires to evaluate all the inputs and feedback, make calculations for the gains and compensations, and output a new signal for the force amplifier. This calculation time is generally called servo loop update time and its importance is dependent on the desired system response time. If the system response time is long, the servo update time is not critical, because the updates occur so frequently the system behaves like a continuous system Conversely, if the system response is extremely short, then the servo loop update time is very important. In these cases, the response speed of the feedback device is critical. When the control loop reads the required inputs to perform the calculations, it is important that the feedback transducers have the correct information precisely at that time. Any information delay will mean loop calculations are being performed on less-than-current information. This can cause a decrease in the system response and possible instability. All of these parameters are important in the implementation of feedback loop designs. Despite the progress made in developing control systems for motors, control systems for electromagnetic brakes and clutches are unsatisfactory. This has created a problem with the design and manufacture of robots. A typical robot arm moves under the control of a motor. When current to the motor stops, the arm continues to move until a brake is applied. Such brakes and/or clutches are typically either fully on or fully off. However, if a robot arm is stopped with a brake, the momentum of the arm may cause the arm to snap or break a joint. When designing closed loop control systems, the parameters of the controller, amplifier, and motor are critical for meeting the system's specifications. The theoretical analysis and simulation of the control system is also an important step in system design. But when the system is built with hardware, the selection of the feedback loop's parameters is an equally critical design decision, if not more so. I have found that these parameters may also be applied to electromagnetic brakes and clutches. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a closed loop control system for a friction device such as a clutch or brake, that allows an electromagnetic clutch or brake to vary its torque based on user specified parameters such as torque, acceleration, velocity position, or any combination thereof. This system can also be used as an anti-slip or anti-lock controller. The system may be configured for use with a power-on or power-off clutch or brake. Instead of applying error information gathered from the previous cycle, the control system described here works within each cycle, constantly measuring and correcting itself so that, for example, deceleration rate of a robot arm with varying inertia is held constant, minimizing damage to the robot. The control concept is based on the fact that, during normal operation, the torque provided by a friction clutch or brake is proportional to the force applied to the friction faces. In a power on device, the torque is proportional to the current flowing through the field. In a power off device, the force provided by a spring or permanent magnet determines the torque. Heretofore clutches and brakes have been used only as on-of or start-stop devices. However, varying levels of torque can be achieved by varying the current running through the field to these devices and thus make it possible to dynamically adjust current, and consequently torque, during the start or stop cycle. In order to adjust this current effectively, a closed loop control system is required. By dynamically adjusting the current, the applied torque can be modulated to reduce breakage of parts due to inertia and momentum. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a schematic of a conventional single loop motor torque control syste Figure 2 is a schematic of a conventional three loop motor control system. Figure 3 is schematic of a multiple loop brake control syste Figures 4 and 5a are schematics of a power on control systems. Figure 5b is a detailed schematic of a power off control system. Figure 6 is a block diagram illustrating the power on control system of Figure 4 Figure 7 is a block diagram illustrating the power on and power off control systems of Figures 5a and 5b. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION Figure 3 is a generic functional diagram of a multiple loop closed loop control system for a brake or a clutch 300. Process variables (torque 301, velocity 302, and position 303) are read via sensors 304, 305, and 306 respectively, conditioned and corrected, then sent to a closed loop amplifier307, 308, and 309 which compares its reading to a user specified reference. The difference between the process variable and reference signal generates a current command 310, which is fed to a closed loop current control 311. The current control system tightly controls the current flow through the clutch or brake 312. The torque generated by the clutch or brake running at the controlled current affects the process variable, and the process begins again. Those skilled in the art understand that a digital controller may be substituted for the amplifier. In that case, the feedback signal is digitized by conventional analog-to-digital converters for processing by the digital controller. The control scheme for a power on device differs from the scheme used for a power off device. In a power on device the system increases the field current to increase the torque of the device. A power off device works in reverse of this. As the field current is increased, the spring force is counteracted by magnetic force, lowering the force and available torque. Different circuitry has been developed to accommodate the two different methods of operation. Figure 4 shows a clutch torque tracking controller 400. The clutch torque tracking controller as shown uses motor torque as its initial signal. The current from power FET Ml 401 is proportional to the motor torque. For this and all other embodiments of the invention, an output signal will be considered proportional to an input signal, after the input signal has been amplified, scaled, conditioned, and/or compared to the reference signal. The amplifier U1B 402 takes a feedback current signal 403 and amplifies it to generate an output current 404 that is at least counteracts the motor torque. A block diagram illustrating this process is provided in Figure 6. Figures 5a and 5b are detailed schematics of power-on and power-off control systems. While the methods of energizing and de-energizing the brake differ, the process for monitoring the torque and regulating the output current is the same. As the schematics of figure 5a illustrates, a sensor 501 used to read a specific variable. That variable can be torque, position, or velocity. The output of that sensor is then fed to a differential amplifier 502, where the signal is adjusted and sent a series of operational amplifiers 503 and 504. It is through this process that the signal is conditioned, scaled and adjusted. The resulting signal is then compared to a reference input at amplifier labeled 505. Finally, that signal is sent to an amplifier 506 which also receives the actual feedback current 507 generated from power FET 508. The amplifier then generates an output current 509 that counteracts motor torque. Figure 7 is a simplistic block diagram illustrating the power-on and power- off control systems of Figures 5a and 5b. In this process, a torque signal is generated via a transducer 701. That torque signal is conditioned, scaled 702, and compared with a reference signal 703. The resulting signal is then compared with the torque current 704, and the resulting current to the brake 705 is increased or decreased. In the preferred embodiment the amplifier generates a torque signal greater than the motor torque signal, e.g., 110% of the motor torque signal. By tracking the motor torque, the controller avoids the abrupt application of excessive braking torque to the system. Instead it applies a torque that is greater than the driving torque but not so great as to generate inertial damage to the real world components. This feature is especially useful during low torque loads. If the full braking power of the brake is applied when there is a light torque on the motor, the abrupt deceleration of the elements moved by the motor may cause one or more joints to be stressed or damaged. Thus a control system is provided allowing soft starts or soft stops as may be required or desired. The system is also capable of operating around any process variable that can be affected by the clutch or brake being controlled, such as torque, speed, encoder/resolver output, etc. In torque mode, the torque signal is measured and controlled directly. In speed mode, the speed signal is manipulated by the system to control acceleration (time to speed, time to zero speed). Digital signals such as encoder inputs can be used in the same way with additional computation. Each control signal mode is manipulated before it is passed to the control portion of the circuit depending upon the nature of the control mode and the desired performance of the automated device. In addition to the ability to set and control a clutch or brake with a single value that is entered by the user, this system is capable of outputting a time varying profile. This means that the device can be programmed to vary the control setting over time. For example, a programmed soft start could command a clutch to start with low torque, then build its torque as speed increases, minimizing shock to other components in the power transmission system. The same could be done with a brake in programmed soft stop mode. The profile can be altered to optimize system response . Furthermore, in addition to controlling the clutch or brake, the system can simultaneously monitor performance characteristics of an electric motor, and vary the current provided to the motor as it maintains and controls the clutch or brake. Possible applications for this control are business machines where paper must be moved precisely, industrial automation products where high rates of acceleration could damage components, tension control devices, overload protection, and programmable bidirectional one way clutches, A power on brake was tested to determine the feasible range of control that could be achieved. The device tested was a 1.75" power on brake (Deltran model BF-17). The test setup consisted of a servo motor with a large additional flywheel, a torque transducer (used for feedback) and the brake driven by the control circuit. The motor was accelerated to 3000 RPM, and then disabled. The brake was then engaged to stop the load from this speed while dynamic torque and speed were measured. The results showed that the brake torque could be reliably varied from 5 to 27 lb-in, and the time to zero speed could be varied from 1.4 to .3 seconds by setting the desired torque level by adjusting a single potentiometer. There are a number of enhancements planned to make programming and operation of the control system simpler and more accurate. Most notably, a programmable front end will be added so that the user can plug a computer into the control, tune the clutch or brake and upload a control program to it via a serial port. The system shown and described above may be implemented with discrete components in an analog circuit or in a digital system using a microprocessor, memory and program. When used in robotic designs, the controllers of the present invention allow greater control of such robots, allowing smoother operations through the incorporation of soft starts and soft stops in robotic movement that can be adjusted per operational requirements.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A control system for an electromagnetic friction device comprising: an amplifier having a reference input proportional to a desired torque and a torque error input, for generating an output signal proportional to the difference between the two inputs; said electromagnetic friction device connected to the amplifier for applying a stopping torque in accordance with the output signal of the amplifier; a transducer coupled to the electromagnetic friction device for generating an error signal proportional to the torque applied to the electromagnetic friction device; means for connecting the transducer error signal to the error input of the amplifier. 2. The control system of claim 1 wherein said transducer is an analog device. 3. The control system of claim 1 wherein said transducer is a digital device. 4. The control system of claim 1 wherein a microprocessor device is used to generate said output signal. 5. The control system of claim 1 wherein analog components are used to generate said output signal. 6. The control system of claim 1 wherein the output signal is pulse width modulated. 7. The control system of claim 1 wherein said reference signal is supplied and controlled through an external device. 8. The control system of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic friction device can be enabled and disabled through an external device. 9. The control system of claim 1 wherein said output signal, said error signal , and said reference signal are connected to an external display. 10. The control system of claim 1 wherein said control system also monitors a performance characteristic of an electric motor and regulates a current provided to said motor as it monitors and controls the electromagnetic friction device. 11. The control system of claim 1 further comprising a velocity transducer for generating a velocity error signal proportional to the velocity of the electromagnetic friction device and a means for connecting the velocity error signal to the amplifier. 12. The control system of claim 11 further comprising a position transducer for generating a position error signal proportional to the position of the electromagnetic friction device and a means for connecting the position error signal to the amplifier. 13. A control system for an electromagnetic friction device comprising: an amplifier having an input signal proportional to a current driving a load on a motor; means for adjusting the amplifier to generate an output current equal to or greater than the motor driving current; a electromagnetic friction device for receiving the output current of the amplifier and applying a driving or a stopping torque to the motor; a feedback signal coupled to the amplifier and proportional to the current in the motor. 14. A method of controlling an electronic friction device comprising the steps of generating an error signal through a transducer, proportional to the torque applied to the electromagnetic friction device, providing a reference signal and said error signal to an amplifier, comparing said error signal to said reference signal, generating an output current, from said amplifier, proportional to the difference between said error signal and said reference signal, and applying said output current to said electromagnetic friction device. 15. The method of claim 14 wherein said reference signal is scaled to assure compatibility with input requirements. 16. The method of claim 14 further comprising a velocity transducer for generating a velocity error signal proportional to the velocity of said electromagnetic friction device which includes the step of generating a velocity error signal proportional to the velocity of said electromagnetic friction device, and delivering said velocity error signal to said amplifier. 17. The method of claim 14 further comprising a position transducer for generating a position error signal proportional to the position of said electromagnetic friction device which includes the step of generating a position error signal proportional to the position of said electromagnetic friction device, and delivering said position error signal to said amplifier. 18. A method of controlling an electromagnetic friction device which includes an amplifier which generates an output current greater than or equal to a motor driving current and a means for adjusting said amplifier to regulate said output current, comprising the steps of generating a feedback signal proportional to said motor driving current, delivering said feedback signal to said amplifier, generating said output current greater than or equal to said motor driving current, sending said output current to said electromagnetic friction device, and applying a driving or stopping torque to said motor.

Inventors: BUZZARD BRIAN, BUZZARD, BRIAN
Applicants: AMERICAN PREC IND INC, BUZZARD BRIAN, AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC., BUZZARD, BRIAN
Application year: 2001
Main classification: H02K7
IPC codes: B60T13, F16D48, H02K7, H02P5, H02P7, H02P15, H02P21